Youtube comments of 神州 Shenzhou (@Shenzhou.).

  1. Pakistan is China's dear friend, we call Pakistani our Iron Brother (巴铁) because our bond is as strong as iron 🇨🇳 🇵🇰
    3300
  2. It's called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to experience it.
    2800
  3. Pan Zhanle represents the best of Chinese virtues. Humble and respectful, yet confident and willing to speak out against injustice.
    2800
  4. Israel has dropped more than 70,000 tons of ordnance on Gaza since last October, far surpassing the of Dresden, Hamburg, and London combined during WWII.
    2400
  5. "There's no way the US can crush us. The world cannot leave us because we are more advanced. If the lights go out in the West, the East will still shine. And if the North goes dark, there is still the South. America doesn't represent the world. America only represents a portion of the world." — Ren Zhengfei, Huawei CEO
    2300
  6. With Nord Stream gone, Germany now has to import natural gas at inflated rates from the United States, while India and China are buying cheap Russian gas in Rupees/Ruble/Renminbi.
    2100
  7. Germany has a strange way of viewing things. The country that supplies them with cheap gas (i.e Russia), they call an enemy. The country that's their biggest trade partner (i.e China), they call a threat. The country that blew up their gas pipeline (i.e USA), they call a friend.
    2000
  8. It's bafflingly how people still mistakenly believe that it is China that pays for the tariffs, not the consumers themselves.
    1900
  9. The irony is that de-dollarization is being accelerated by the US's own actions. As Putin said during the summit, it's not Russia that rejected the Dollar, it's the Dollar that rejected Russia.
    1800
  10. USA approves ATACMS for Ukraine. Zelenskyy: "The missiles will speak for themselves!" Russia responds with Oreshnik. Zelenskyy: "Putin is using Ukraine as testing ground!"
    1800
  11. The unipolar world is dying and the multipolar world is being born.
    1800
  12. Germany has a strange way of viewing things. The country that supplies them with cheap gas (i.e Russia), they call an enemy. The country that's their biggest trade partner (i.e China), they call a threat. The country that blew up their gas pipeline (i.e USA), they call a friend.
    1700
  13. China delivers infrastructure, while the US delivers lectures.
    1600
  14. Zelenskyy: "You promised to support Ukraine till the end!" Biden: "This IS the end!"
    1400
  15. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past just like some African countries. China found success through building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, etc and China is offering the same path to development to many countries in Africa. China has done much to develop countries in Africa in just decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1400
  16. Zelenskyy: "You promised to support Ukraine until the end!" Trump: "This IS the end."
    1400
  17. NATO claims China is prolonging the conflict in Ukraine by providing aid to Russia. When in fact it is NATO that's prolonging the inevitable by continuing to send aid to Ukraine.
    1300
  18. Putin can hold a 5 hour marathon press conference, whereas Biden can't even hold one for 5 minutes.
    1300
  19. 我们将继续努力～为我们两国创造更美好的未来。 🇨🇳🇵🇰 We will continue our efforts to build a better future for both our countries. 🇨🇳🇵🇰
    1300
  20. China delivers infrastructure, US delivers lectures.
    1000
  21. The West's obsession with China's economic downfall has been ongoing for over 30 years. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning. China's Coming Financial Meltdown 2020. NYT. Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak 2021. Bloomberg. Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize 2022. Bloomberg China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n 2023. Bloomberg. No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1000
  22. NATO's goals include: -Keeping Russia out. -Keeping Germany down. -Keeping US in.
    1000
  23. From what I understand, chip fabrication requires enormous amounts of water, yet the US decided to build TMSC wafer fabrication plants in arid Arizona of all places.
    1000
  24. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    962
  25. Goals of NATO: -Keep Russia out. -Keep Germany down. -Keep USA in.
    947
  26. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? .... Yet it's already 2023 and China's economy is still going strong.
    942
  27. Not only is the US responsible, but the UK bears responsibility as well.
    909
  28. If you want to see the past 1000s of years of Chinese history, visit Xi'an. If you want to see the past 100s of years of Chinese history, visit Beijing. If you want to see the past 10s of years of Chinese history, visit Shanghai. And if you want to see the future, visit Shenzhen.
    889
  29. Say No to NATO expansion and Yes to BRICS expansion.
    868
  30. China delivers infrastructures, while the US delivers lectures.
    866
  31. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world, dominated by a single voice (namely the US and its "allies").
    864
  32. In March 2022, Russian forces had Kiev surrounded, but Putin unilaterally withdrew Russian forces from Kiev as a gesture of goodwill, in order to create favorable conditions for peace talks. Talks that were later torpedoed by Boris Johnson.
    856
  33. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has generated 192,000 jobs for Pakistanis 🇨🇳 🇵🇰.
    819
  34. How to avoid WWIII: Rule No. 1: Don't March on Moscow. Rule No. 2: Don't Bluff Beijing. Rule No. 3: Don't Test Tehran.
    818
  35. Over 65,000 tonnes of ordnance have been dropped in Gaza, which is equivalent to more than 3 times what was dropped in Hiroshima.
    811
  36. Huawei truly exemplifies the Chinese proverb: In every crisis, there is opportunity.
    785
  37. How to avoid WW3: Rule No.1: Don't March on Moscow. Rule No.2: Don't Bluff Beijing. Rule No.3: Don't Test Tehran.
    764
  38. The goals of NATO include: -Keeping Germany down. -Keeping Russia out. -Keeping US in.
    756
  39. USA's tariffs on China is like lifting a stone to aim at someone, only to drop the stone on one's own toes.
    756
  40. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past. Today, and China is the world's 2nd largest economy (largest economy by GDP PPP), the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army.
    731
  41. China seeks win-win cooperation whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    726
  42. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    718
  43. I had the opportunity to study abroad so I learned English to act as a bridge between the two cultures, but I was appalled at how China is being portrayed in the West. Whenever I bring up China's achievements to them, they just laughed at me, called me brainwashed and some even told me to "Go back to China is you like it there!". This coming from people who probably never actually set foot in China and seen what life in China is really like.
    711
  44. "There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen." – Vladimir Ilyich Lenin.
    710
  45. Zelenskyy: "You promised to support Ukraine until the end!" Biden: "Well, this IS the end!"
    704
  46. Mainland China is arguably the only one in the world that truly cares for Hong Kong. We know that the United States clearly doesn't, and mainland Chinese have been taught to regard the people of Hong Kong as part of the same family. It's a shame that this feeling is not always reciprocated by the people of Hong Kong towards the mainland.
    693
  47. China stands in solidarity with Iran over the bombing of their embassy in Syria. China remembers the bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade in 1999.
    689
  48. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world, dominated by a single voice (namely the US and its "allies").
    685
  49. Rule No. 1: Don't March on Moscow. Rule No. 2: Don't Bluff Beijing.
    682
  50. China seeks win-win cooperation, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    676
  51. China seeks win-win cooperation, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    676
  52. Funny how the journalist's questions are just various ways to say: "Are you going to condemn Russia?" It's like she won't accept any answer that doesn't say "Yes"
    672
  53. Israel has dropped 65,000 tons of ordnance on Gaza since Oct 7, which is equivalent to more than three times what was dropped in Hiroshima.
    668
  54. In China, the government keeps the corporations in check for China's benefit. Whereas in the US, it's the corporations that keeps their government in check for profit.
    656
  55. Zelenskyy: "You promised to support Ukraine until the end!" Biden: "Well, it's the end of my administration, so there goes your support."
    653
  56. Despite being accused of debt-trap diplomacy, China offers loans with lower interest rates (1.5% over 15 – 20 years) than Western loans and also comes with fewer strings attached. At times, China has even forgiven debt to African countries .
    653
  57. China was once a dirt poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but China has found success through infrastructure and we are offering the same path to success to other developing countries through the Belt and Road Initiative.
    641
  58. Say No to NATO expansion, and Yes to BRICS expansion.
    621
  59. The world has become a board game in which, USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead, Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead, China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    615
  60. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell Recession. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    610
  61. If Ukraine sacrifices 100 soldiers to take out 1 Russian tank, the media in the west celebrates the loss of that single Russian tank, rather than mourn the 100 Ukrainian soldiers lost
    608
  62. The goals of NATO include: -Keeping Germany down. -Keeping Russia out. -Keeping the US in.
    606
  63. What doesn't kill you only makes you stronger. Huawei was restricted from Google's Android operating system, they came up with an OS of their own, HarmonyOS.
    605
  64. The Chinese market is already the world's largest consumer of semiconductors, purchasing more than 50% of the chips manufactured globally.
    591
  65. China seeks win-win cooperation whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    585
  66. Many Chinese are willing to learn more about America. However, many Americans aren't willing to understand China.
    580
  67. The silence in the western media on the BRICS summit in Kazan is deafening.
    577
  68. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US's).
    570
  69. China has become so high tech that when visitors to China return to their home country, they often feel as though they have "travelled back in time" to a less advanced period.
    564
  70. In the past, China suffered from "brain drain" where intellectuals travel from a developing country to a developed country. But with China's rise and the Sinophobia in the U.S, China is now experiencing a "reverse brain drain" where intellectuals travel from a developed country to a developing country.
    553
  71. Western colonial powers had spent centuries in Africa making the people poor, whereas China has done much to develop Africa in just decades.
    552
  72. In 1971, China received the support from 26 African nations in the UN to take over the seat from Taiwan. Mao Zedong was grateful for the support and said, "It is our African brothers who have carried us into the UN".
    543
  73. China seeks win-win cooperation, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    542
  74. China's Uighur population in 1950s: 3.6 million. China's Uighur population in 2020s: 11.7 million. Their population has nearly tripled in size over the decades.
    526
  75. Bullying only works when the victim is weaker.
    525
  76. If a lie gets repeated long enough, the lie starts to believe it Israel.
    517
  77. Instead of calling for a outright ceasefire, many western leaders just use the term "humanitarian pause" which is just a euphemism.
    507
  78. Russia has successfully completed their elections, while Zelenskyy has canceled elections for Ukraine, and his term as President is due to expire by May 20th 2024.
    504
  79. Ask any mainland Chinese and we have been taught to regard the people of Taiwan as part of the same family. Mainland China is arguably the only one in the world to truly care for Taiwan. We know that the US certainly doesn't.
    502
  80. China recently hosted foreign ministers from Arab and Muslim nations for talks on ending the war in Gaza. Meanwhile the US continues to support Israel militarily.
    500
  81. "Today, America is the only major developed society where the average income of the bottom 50% has gone down over a 30-year period. By contrast, in the past 40 years the Chinese people have experienced a greater improvement in their standard of living than they have experienced in 4,000 years." - Kishore Mabubani, Singaporean Diplomat.
    500
  82. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    499
  83. Western journalists predictions about China (since 1990). 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ---> (Going to need an entry for 2024. ) ... Yet despite all their predictions, China's economy is still growing.
    495
  84. Founded on a lie, yet repeated so often that the lie starts to think it is real.
    494
  85. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    485
  86. Say YES to BRICS and NO to NATO.
    482
  87. United States hosts these summits without really offering anything tangible to participants. China hosts these summits while bringing tangible benefits to other participants, such as infrastructure development (i.e roads, railway, highways, bridges, tunnels, etc).
    482
  88. Even Apple has found that it was unable to turn a profit making iPhones in India. Apple supplier Wistron has reportedly shut down iPhone production in India as it was struggling to make profits in the region under Apple's terms.
    480
  89. The fact that the current US Ambassador to China doesn't even speak Mandarin, indicates just how much the US knows about China.
    477
  90. Seeing is believing. I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, and I was appalled at how negatively China was portrayed in the west. Whenever I bring up China's achievements to them, some people (not all of them) just laugh, and some even told me to "Go back to China if you like it there!". Even though many of them have never set foot in China themselves.
    477
  91. It's no secret that the U.S is in decline and China is rising. Countries like Saudi Arabia can sense which direction the wind is blowing and making policy changes that suit their interests first.
    459
  92. The 19th Century belonged to Great Britain. The 20th Century belonged to the United States. The 21st Century will belong to Asia.
    455
  93. China and Russia are facilitating the transition towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, from the current uni-polar world dominated by a single voice, namely the U.S's and it's allies.
    454
  94. Yet, some people still label Huawei as a state-owned company, when in actual fact, it's employee owned.
    453
  95. Here's what other western economists have been saying about China's economy since 1990. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet the fact is that China's economy grew 5% in 2024.
    448
  96. Even though the CEO of TikTok is a Singaporean, but because he is Chinese, they assume that he works for the Chinese government. That's just like saying just because the CEO of Microsoft is an Indian, that somehow Microsoft works for the Indian government. 😂
    446
  97. Many countries like Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Argentina are expressing an interest in joining BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.
    445
  98. According to a survey, Chinese kids want to be astronauts when they grow up, while American kids want to be YouTubers.
    445
  99. China is among the first countries to extend congratulations to Putin on his reelection. While Russia has just successfully completed its elections, Ukraine decided it will not be holding any elections this year.
    441
  100. "Peace cannot be limited and the ceasefire cannot have an expiration date. Once the window of opportunity is open, it should not be closed, and once the fire has been extinguished, it cannot be rekindled." – Wang Yi, Chinese Foreign Minister's remarks on Gaza.
    435
  101. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi "围棋"), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    435
  102. "Do not worry if others do not understand you. Instead, worry if you do not understand others." - Confucius
    431
  103. The Geneva Convention clearly acknowledges the Palestinian's right to armed struggle against the occupying forces of Israel.
    428
  104. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world, dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US and its "allies".)
    428
  105. Say NO to NATO and YES to BRICS!
    425
  106. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    419
  107. USA and EU: "We all need to do our part to address climate change!" Also, USA and EU impose tariffs on Chinese solar panels and EVs.
    418
  108. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    418
  109. During the Cold War, China was thought to be isolated (not true) while the US was all about global engagement. Today, it appears the roles have reversed and it is the US that's heading towards isolation while China is an active participant in global affairs. How the times have changed.
    415
  110. Space exploration is an important endeavor and as a Chinese, I'm proud our country is able to contribute to mankind's understanding of the cosmos.
    413
  111. Many Filipinos tend to have "colonial mentality". Not only were Philippines' lands colonized, but also the minds of its people were colonized. Even after the colonizer left, the people's minds remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. It's like Stockholm Syndrome.
    411
  112. In fact, the Russian Ruble was ranked the world's best performing currency of 2022.
    410
  113. Colonialism of India may be over, but coloniality remains in the minds of its people. Coloniality is the perception that Western culture and language is inherently superior to that of other cultures (including their own local cultures). Even after the colonizer left, the minds of the local people remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. Coloniality is still present today in the minds of people from former colonies (such as India, the Philippines, and even Hong Kong).
    407
  114. "The significance of China's example is not that it provides an alternative, but the demonstration that alternatives exist." – Eric X. Li: A tale of two political systems.
    403
  115. China seeks win-win cooperation, while the US only sees a zero sum game.
    402
  116. In the US, you can change the government, but not the policies. In China, while the government doesn't change, the policies do.
    402
  117. China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia have since succumbed to history. China has witness the rise and fall of numerous other nations and yet China has survived to the modern era relatively intact.
    401
  118. I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad in the United States, and I was appalled at the fear and paranoia many Americans (but not all) hold towards China and Chinese people. Whenever I try to bring up China's positive achievements like lifting millions out of poverty, some Americans (but not all) just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill, and some even took it a step further and told me to "Go back to China!"
    398
  119. Additionally, China is home to 80-90% of the world's rare earth metals production. Rare earth metals are used in batteries, magnets, LEDs, screens, hard disks, solar panels, wind turbines, smart phones, etc. Therefore, it's impossible to decouple with China's economy.
    396
  120. Chinese: "Welcome to China!" Americans: "Go back to China!"
    392
  121. Africa for the natural resources. The Middle East for the oil. Now the Artic for the trade routes and rare earths. Imperialism in a nutshell.
    391
  122. 1990. China's economy has come to a halt. The Economist. 1996. China's economy will face a hard landing. The Economist. 1998. China's economy’s dangerous period of sluggish growth. The Economist. 1999. Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. Bank of Canada. 2000. China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. Chicago Tribune. 2001. A hard landing in China. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas. 2002. China Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. Westchester University. 2003. Banking crisis imperils China. New York Times. 2004. The great fall of China? The Economist. 2005. The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. Nouriel Roubini. 2006. Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? International Economy. 2007. Can China avoid a hard landing? TIME. 2008. Hard Landing In China? Forbes. 2009. China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. Fortune. 2010: Hard landing coming in China. Nouriel Roubini. 2011: Chinese Hard Landing Closer Than You Think. Business Insider. 2012: Economic News from China: Hard Landing. American Interest. 2013: A Hard Landing In China. Zero Hedge. 2014. A hard landing in China. CNBC. 2015. Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. Forbes. 2016. Hard landing looms for China. The Economist. 2017. Is China's Economy Going To Crash? National Interest. 2018. China's Coming Financial Meltdown. The Daily Reckoning. 2019. Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019. Zero Hedge. 2020. Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. Forbes. 2021. Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. Bloomberg. 2022. China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n. Bloomberg. 2023. No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. Bloomberg. ... But it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong
    385
  123. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    380
  124. China has transformed from a once a poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy (or world's largest if measured by GDP PPP), the factory of the world (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest military, the People's Liberation Army.
    378
  125. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    378
  126. Biden: "We will support Ukraine for as long as it takes!" After Oct 7, Biden: "We will support Ukraine for as long as we can!"
    375
  127. 1975: Fall of Saigon as the US abandoned their Vietnamese allies. 2021: Fall of Kabul as the US abandoned their Afghan allies. Fall of Kiev coming soon...
    375
  128. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, rather than the unipolar world dominated by a single voice, namely that of the US and its "allies."
    374
  129. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world, dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US's).
    374
  130. China is already the world's largest market for robotics and automation. This automated port can also work 24/7, even at night in complete darkness.
    374
  131. China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    371
  132. The G7 countries have been dwarfed by BRICS countries. They should rename themselves "The Seven Dwarfs."
    370
  133. Ukraine launched an offensive with a goal of gaining territory (which it largely failed to achieved) If Russia does launch an offensive, their goal would not be to take more territory, but to demilitarize the Ukraine Army.
    368
  134. The population of Uighurs in Xinjiang has actually grown by 16% since 2010.
    366
  135. If you follow the correct stroke order, you will get a very pretty looking character. Otherwise the character may look weird or could be mistaken for another character. For example, a poorly written 台 may start to resemble 合.
    364
  136. This video sheds a lot of light on the seriousness of US-China relations. Lu Kang presented a strong and firm defense against the NBC reporters' attempts to rile him up. This has been very enlightening for me and I hope more people watch videos like this instead of the typical Western media.
    362
  137. Russia and China are facilitating the global transition towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US's).
    356
  138. China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today. China has always been governed by a strong central government, whether under the Emperor and the Imperial Court, or under the Communist Party of China today, and such a political system has shown be effective for governing China. Not all countries have to adopt "Western style" democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    347
  139. China is so futuristic that many expats in China have found that travelling back to their home countries is almost like "travelling backwards in time".
    338
  140. China is the most optimistic country in the world according to Statista. In China, three quarters of the respondents in a survey were optimistic about the future. This compares to less than 30 percent in Japan and only about one third in Italy, the Netherlands, and France. Worldwide, just above 40 percent of the respondents felt optimistic about the future. The survey was conducted in 2023.
    337
  141. Here's what western magazines have been saying about China's economy since 1990: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    335
  142. Chinese universities train more STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) than any other in the world. The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates (2016) 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568, 000) 4. Russia (561, 000) 5. Iran (355, 000) 6. Indonesia (206, 000) 7. Japan (195, 000) ... Source: World Economic Forum
    334
  143. Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors. However, many Westerners are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands as unwelcome.
    334
  144. There are multiple ways to define democracy. The most common definition is that of a government of the people, by the people, for the people. Under this definition, the U.S is not a democracy, it's a plutocracy, with a government of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%. Because the U.S government is just not delivering what the people want. On the other hand, China is a democracy in the sense that the government is doing what the people want, as the Harvard University and Ash Center survey revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China.
    334
  145. China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    332
  146. Say No to NATO expansion and Yes to BRICS expansion.
    329
  147. Israel has dropped over 65,000 tonnes of ordnance in Gaza, with a yield that is over 3 times more powerful than the nuclear bomb that was dropped in Hiroshima
    325
  148.  @alexng7583  Sounds neat. It has the shiny appearance of silver, while retaining the strength of iron underneath.
    325
  149. One of China's newest solar power plant doesn't even use solar panels. Instead, it uses a large array of angled mirrors to focus the Sun's rays onto a top of a tower containing molten salt, heating the salt up to 1000 °C which then drives a steam generator to generate electricity. The advantage of molten salt is that it takes a long time to cool down, allowing the power plant to generate electricity even at night without the Sun.
    325
  150. The Geneva Convention supports the Palestinian's right to armed resistance against the occupying power.
    324
  151. Fall of Saigon — USA pulled out of Vietnam in 1975. Fall of Kabul — USA pulled out of Afghanistan in 2021. Fall of Kiev — USA pulling out of Ukraine in ... 2025 perhaps? Hopefully Taiwan sees the pattern here of what happens to US allies.
    320
  152. The US is much accustomed to strangling the economies of other countries, now they are finally getting a taste of their own medicine and having their economy strangled in the Red Sea.
    319
  153. The unipolar world is dying and the multipolar world is being born.
    316
  154. Zelenskyy: "You promised to support Ukraine until the end!" Bide: "This IS the end!"
    312
  155. Canada, Mexico and the European Union were taken by surprise by the tariffs. Whereas China had been preparing for additional tariffs since Trump's first term.
    309
  156. Netanyahu knows that if a ceasefire is achieved in Gaza, his whole political career will be over, as the repercussions of his actions catch up to him. So he keeps on prolonging the inevitable by preventing a ceasefire from manifesting.
    308
  157. Every Chinese person who knows his home country's history, knows of Zheng He's treasure voyages.
    307
  158. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, rather than the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and its allies).
    299
  159. Say NO to NATO and YES to BRICS!
    297
  160. It's been said that the era of colonization is over, but the colonial mentality remains in the minds of people. Some people's minds remain "mentally colonized" and display a preference for Anglo-Saxon culture and values, while feeling a lack of pride in one's own heritage.
    288
  161. The unipolar world is dying and the multipolar world is being born.
    287
  162. The colonizer not only colonize territory, but they also colonized the local people's minds, through promoting their own culture over theirs, and also devising education systems to inculcate their values into the local children. Even after the colonizer left, the minds of the people may remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. This "colonial mentality" is remains predominate in Hong Kong, India, the Philippines and other former colonies.
    283
  163. Washington slap sanctions on Moscow, so Russia does business with China instead. Washington slap sanctions on Iran nuclear deal, so Iran does business with China instead. Washington slap tariffs on steel and aluminum, so many countries switch to China instead. President Trump is really making China great again.
    280
  164. Rule No. 1: Don't March on Moscow. Rule No. 2: Don't Bluff Beijing.
    279
  165. It's a combination of the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (phobia of the West being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, such that the thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China surpassing the U.S someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    278
  166. U.S sanctioning China is kinda like a boxing match where the U.S is too busy punching himself, while China is training and doing push-ups.
    275
  167. Even worst, the first plumber that threatened your family and wrecked your furniture, has domestic issues at home, yet isn't interested in fixing his own leaky plumbing at home.
    272
  168. The West has been polluting the Earth for 200-300 years (since the Industrial Revolution beginning in 1700-1800) whereas China only recently industrialized about 30 years ago. Industrialization is a necessary step in order for civilizations to progress, and that's why Western countries became powerful at the expense of the Earth. So why do some Western people still impose their "clean" energy practices on other countries?
    269
  169. Whatever one's views about Putin, there's no denying that he's making Russia strong again through falling unemployment levels and increasing economic growth. No wonder why he enjoys much support among the people of Russia. Unfortunately, we can't say the same for how people in the West feel about their leaders.
    269
  170. Ukraine has seemingly forgotten about the Battle of Kursk fought by Germany during WWII against the Soviet Union, one of the costliest and fiercest battles of the entire WWII and resulting in Soviet victory.
    268
  171. Despite claiming to be a "free market," the United States is the world's most protectionist country. According to Global Trade Alert, the USA took over 800 protectionist measures since 2008, while China only took between 200-300 of such measures. It's no wonder what's happening to Tik Tok.
    268
  172. Previously, Australia had sailed warships through the Taiwan strait between Taiwan island and the mainland. So it's only fair that Chinese Navy conduct live fire exercise between Australia and New Zealand.
    265
  173. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    262
  174. Many in Hong Kong (but not all of them) tend to have the colonial mentality. Colonial mentality is the internalized perception of ethnic or cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization. Such people tend to display a preference for the cultures of Anglo-Saxons, while harboring a disdain for any "non-Anglo" culture, including their own.
    261
  175. Like many Africans, many Chinese know poverty and what it is like to eat dirt to survive. Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past (probably even poorer that some African countries), yet China found our path to success through the building of infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, so China is now offering this to African countries who wish to emulate China's path to success.
    259
  176. US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only plan short-term. Whereas China can plan long term, making 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-years, since Chinese leaders will remain in power to see those plans through.
    255
  177. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    255
  178. As of June 2022, China had the largest stock of highway legal plug-in passenger cars with 10 million units, 46% of the global fleet in use. China also dominates the plug-in light commercial vehicle and electric bus deployment, with its stock reaching over 500,000 buses in 2019, 98% of the global stock, and 247,500 electric light commercial vehicles, 65% of the global fleet.
    253
  179. China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia eventually succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of nations, the rise and fall of empires, and survived the passage of history to modern times while largely intact. China has even made it into space, landing lunar rovers on the Moon, and launching space stations into orbit. China is both an ancient civilization, as well as modern space nation.
    251
  180. The unipolar world is dying and the multipolar world is being born.
    251
  181. War's already won. The question is how will peace be won.
    244
  182. Chinese proverb: "One who stands straight doesn't fear a crooked shadow." (身正不怕影子斜) It means a man of integrity doesn't fear if appears unrighteous in the eyes of others.
    243
  183. China doesn't want war, but it doesn't mean it is weak. China is not afraid of war and the People's Liberation Army will do whatever is necessary to safeguard China's sovereignty.
    243
  184. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, rather than the unipolar world, dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US and its "allies").
    238
  185. It makes no sense for Russian forces to painstakingly avoid civilian casualties for weeks, only to jeopardize it in Bucha. They had weeks to cover up everything, yet they just left everything exposed haphazardly in Bucha for the Ukrainian forces to "discover"?
    238
  186. Yes, they're now saying it's the fault of "Outside Agitators".
    236
  187. This Cambodian prodigy can speak multiple languages (English, Espaniol, Mandarin, etc) but sadly, all the Western tourists seem to pass by him, or merely find him amusing that's all (they don't care about Cambodians in general) and it was up to Chinese government to scout him out and sponsor his education in China.
    236
  188. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and it's "allies".)
    234
  189. There's an old Chinese saying: "Good medicine taste bitter. (良药苦口)"
    234
  190.  @TheEVEInspiration  If by doing as the state pleases, simply means that the companies have to obey the law in China. How does that get mixed up with state-owned when Huawei is in fact, employee owned?
    232
  191. China is home to many of the world's busiest ports (i.e Shanghai, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhoushan, Qingdao, Shenzhen, etc) that ship out Made-in-China goods to the rest of the world. India would need just as many busy ports as China if they want to compete.
    230
  192. Photonic chips use photons instead of electrons in their circuits. When used for calculation, their accuracy is approaching that of electronic chips, but photonic chips have the advantage of using less power and they are faster.
    227
  193. Rule No. 1: Don't March on Moscow. Rule No. 2: Don't Bluff Beijing. Rule No. 3: Don't Test Tehran.
    226
  194. China is home to more STEM graduates (Science Technology Engineering Mathematics) than any other in the world. 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000)
    226
  195. It was often thought in the past that China was closed off (not true) while the US was all about global engagement. Now China is an active participant in global affairs, while the US is heading towards isolation.
    225
  196. How to avoid WWIII: Rule No. 1: Don't March on Moscow. Rule No. 2: Don't Bluff Beijing. Rule No. 3: Don't Test Tehran.
    225
  197. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    224
  198. Its not that simple. Many Chinese families at that time were rural farmers, and they needed more hands to work in the fields as a matter of pragmatism. Chinese culture (and many other cultures all over the world) have the sons carry on the family name, whether its in the West or in the Middle East.
    223
  199.  @ShamanKish  The US's of course. From the American taxpayers.
    223
  200. China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain, while the US only sees a zero sum game.
    221
  201. NATO no longer serves any interest since USSR's dissolution. Except perhaps that of the US's.
    219
  202. The difference is that China strives for win-win cooperation, while the US sees everything as a zero sum game.
    219
  203. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. The same cannot be said of Westerners, many of whom are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a bleak outlook of the future.
    218
  204. China stands in solidarity with Iran over the bombing of their embassy in Syria. China remembers the bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade in 1999.
    218
  205. A tragic outcome for Syria. Let this be a lesson to what happens if if a conflict is frozen and left alone. It will come back with a vengeance in the future.
    218
  206. It's not just a matter of dictatorship versus democracy. If we look at Russia, Putin has been in power long enough that he can make long-term plans for Russia and carry them out. Same with China with 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, to chart out China's future in 2030, 2040, 2050. Whereas in the US, their President have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only make short-term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning 10 years or more.
    216
  207. Here's western economist's headlines about China's economy since 1990. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet the fact is that China's economy grew 5% in 2024.
    215
  208. Previously when Tibet was under the Dalai Lama, 95% of the population were slaves while the remaining 5% were the owners. Tibetan mountainous soil was infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas and the people had to struggle to grow enough food to feed themselves. Starvation was common place and theft of food was punished through amputation. Some Tibetan drums (daruma) were made from human skulls and the drumsticks made of human bone. The Chinese government build Qinghai-Lahasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) to connect the isolated Tibet to the rest of the world. Tibetans can now import food from the mainland to feed themselves. Hydroelectric power plants were constructed to provide Tibetans with clean renewable energy. In fact, the population of Tibet has tripled in size from 1 million in 1951 to 3 million in 2020.
    215
  209. Confucius said: "Don't worry that others don't understand you, but be worried that you don't understand others."
    214
  210.  @alexng7583  Whereas Iron represents strength. That's why China and Pakistan are iron-clad brothers, a relationship not defined in terms of money.
    214
  211. US journalists can't even report on the train accident in Ohio.
    213
  212. Trump's tariffs is like lifting a stone to aim at China, only to drop the stone on his own toe.
    211
  213. Today, China is a country of homeowners with more than 90% of households owning homes (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations (Huang et al., 2020). This achievement is particularly impressive and is in sharp contrast to the recent decline of homeownership rate in the U.S., Western Europe and other developed countries.
    211
  214. Ukraine had opportunities to negotiate for peace, such as back in Istanbul March 2022. Putin actually withdrew Russian forces from Kiev as a gesture of goodwill, in order to facilitate favorable conditions for peace talks. Talks that were eventually torpedoed by Boris Johnson.
    209
  215. 孔子说：“不怕别人不了解自己，只怕自己不了解别人。 Confucius said: "Don't be afraid that others don't understand you, but be afraid that you don't understand others." ... Words of wisdom to live by.
    208
  216. Many Filipinos (but not all of them) tend to have the colonial mentality. Colonial mentality is the internalize perception of ethnic and cultural inferiority as a result of colonization. They have an ingrained preference for Anglo Saxon culture over any "non-white" culture, including their own.
    208
  217. The United States is the most protectionist country in the world. In the period from 2009 to September 2023, the United States implemented the highest number of trade policy measures deemed as harmful to global trade liberalization, with nearly 9,500 policies.
    208
  218. China's adult literacy rate is 99%. U.S's adult literacy rate is 79%.
    206
  219. As of June 2022, China had the largest stock of highway legal plug-in passenger cars with 10 million units, 46 percent of the global fleet in use. China also dominates the plug-in light commercial vehicle and electric bus deployment, with its stock reaching over 500,000 buses in 2019, 98 percent of the global stock, and 247,500 electric light commercial vehicles, 65 percent of the global fleet.
    204
  220. Since the 19th Century, many have grown so thoroughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western country like China eventually surpassing the USA someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    203
  221. During Unit 731, Japanese scientists conducted inhuman experiments on Chinese prisoners, including men, women and children. Prisoners were infected with various diseases and then subjected to live vivisection, often without anesthesia. Scientists performed invasive surgeries, organs were removed, limbs amputated and then reattached to opposite sides of the body, all while the subject is alive. Some prisoners even had their stomachs removed and their esophagus reattached to the intestines, presumably to measure how long humans can survive without the stomach. The women had it worst during Unit 731. Prisoners were injected with sexually transmitted diseases and then forced at gunpoint to spread the infection to other prisoners. Women were raped and impregnated (sometimes by Japanese themselves) and then vivisected at various stages of their pregnancy to study the effects of diseases on their organs or on the fetus. Some Japanese scientists even raped female prisoners and then had experiments conducted on unborn children they fathered with female prisoners there. Imagine if you are woman prisoner in Unit 731. Or you are a man injected with STD and then forced at gunpoint to have sex to spread it to other prisoners? Why not simply inject everyone with STD, instead of forcing prisoners to spread STD by sex? Or imagine having your limbs amputated and reattached to opposite sides of your body, all without anastasia.
    203
  222. China actually seeks win-win cooperation with Germany for mutual gain. But Germany has undertaken a comprehensive strategy declaring China as "systemic rival".
    203
  223. China and Russia are facilitating the global transition towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, rather than the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and its "allies").
    203
  224. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice, namely that of the US and its "allies."
    202
  225. China has investigated overseas Uighur's testimonies of kidnapped or dead family members or relative, and it often turns out that their family members or relatives are doing just fine, or had died of unrelated causes.
    200
  226. Say NO to NATO and YES to BRICS!
    200
  227. China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today. China has always been governed by a strong central government, whether under the Emperor and the Imperial Court, or under the Communist Party of China today, and such a political system has shown be effective for governing China. Not all countries have to adopt "Western style" democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    200
  228. China has transformed from a previously poverty-stricken, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy today (or world's largest if measured by GDP PPP), the factory of the world (i.e Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest military, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the CPC.
    200
  229. Here's a Chinese analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    200
  230. China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome and Egypt has since succumbed to history. China is also a modern nation, capable of sending humans into space, launching space stations into orbit and even landing on the far side of the Moon, as China's recent Chang'e-6 lunar lander has.
    198
  231. The scramble for control over the Artic is giving a whole new meaning to the term Cold War.
    198
  232. If you claim Israel has a "right to self-defense" then shouldn't you acknowledge Palestine's right to armed struggle against the occupying power? Armed resistance against the occupying power is a fact that is acknowledged by international humanitarian law conventions.
    197
  233. Rule No. 1: Don't March on Moscow. Rule No. 2: Don't Bluff Beijing. Rule No. 3: Don't Test Tehran.
    197
  234. Levelling those homes in Gaza also prevents Palestinians who have evacuated from returning to Gaza. Such actions ultimately serves Israel's goal of expelling the Palestinians so that they can claim all of their lands.
    196
  235. During the 19th century, Britain was world's largest economy and the Pound Sterling became the world's reserve currency Britain was eventually overtaken by the United States in the 20th century as the world's largest economy, and the U.S Dollar became the world's reserve currency. Now in the 21st century, China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's someday in the foreseeable future, and that suggests that the Chinese Renminbi could potentially become the next reserve currency.
    196
  236. The US Dollar is like the cartoon where Coyote chasing Road Runner off a cliff. Coyote continues running through the empty air until he realizes that there's no more ground beneath him, before "gravity" catches up to him and he starts falling.
    196
  237. She won't take No (or even just Maybe) for answer, she just reiterated her question: "Are you going to condemn Russia?" expressed in different ways that's all.
    195
  238. In March 2022, Russian forces had Kiev surrounded but later Putin decided to withdrew Russian forces from Kiev as a gesture of goodwill, to create favorable conditions for peace talks with Ukraine. Talks that were later torpedoed by Boris Johnson.
    195
  239. To those who claim "I hate the CCP" just watch the video and look at these communist party members, visiting the rural areas, keeping track of poor people, conducting local meetings to vote and listen to poor people's complaints, and then brainstorming ideas to lift them out of poverty. Do you have any idea what communist party members do for China's poor? Yet you just claim to hate the Communist Party of China?
    194
  240. Before I went to sleep, my wife was complaining to me: "This Russia is such a bad country, if Ukraine wants to join NATO, it is their business and freedom, Russia has no right to intervene. This is just an excuse for Russia to invade Ukraine." I said nothing, got out of bed and went to the kitchen, before returning to bed with knife in my hand. I told my wife: "Let's go to sleep" Upon seeing the knife, my wife sat up abruptly and looked at me with wide eyes. "What are you doing? Sleeping with a knife?!" she exclaimed. I replied: "Don’t worry about it, let’s go to sleep. Besides, me sleeping with a knife is none of your business and it is my freedom." My wife said: "You're crazy! How can I sleep when you are lying next to me with a knife? What if you accidentally cut me?" I replied: “Well, you don’t even trust your own husband, how can you expect Russia to trust Ukraine? Sleeping with a knife is like Ukraine joining the NATO." .... An anonymous analogy taken off Weibo.
    194
  241. Former Pakistan President Imran Khan was also well-loved by Pakistani before his removal. Most likely US was involved.
    194
  242. Nobody else seems to be willing to do anything about religion's spread, so it's up to China to do what others don't want to.
    194
  243. Russia also deserves credit for putting forth a UN resolution calling for an immediate cease-fire. the release of all hostages and to allow humanitarian aid to enter Gaza. 5 countries (China, Gabon, Mozambique, Russia, and the UAE) voted in favor of the resolution while 4 countries (France, Japan, the UK and US) voted against.
    193
  244. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, the US is a threat to global peace and stability.
    192
  245. Question: "Can foreigners buy property in China? " The answer is Yes, foreigners are allowed to purchase property in China. The essential requirement is that you have studied or worked in China for at least one year on a residence permit. (Source: Any China Visa)
    191
  246. During the Cold War, China was often thought to be isolated (not true) while the US was all about global engagement. Today, it appears the roles have reversed and it is the US that's heading towards isolation while China is an active participant in global affairs. How the times have changed.
    191
  247. Sadly, many of the overseas Tibetans diaspora (especially in India) have been influenced by the "Free Tibet" movement, and many haven't actually returned to see how far the Tibet Autonomous Region has advanced under the Chinese government.
    190
  248. Putin has emerged a winner in global geopolitics, while Trump has emerged a winner in local US politics.
    189
  249. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    188
  250. Why do people insist on modifying the language to be all about the sounds? Just because they can't pronounce characters like "女"? "女" is Nǚ (Mandarin), Neuih (Cantonese), Neng (Teochew), Ng (Hakka) and even On'na (Japanese). You can even call it "Woman" in English because it has no phonetic component. Chinese writing portrays meaning not pronunciation. It was developed to facilitate trade and communication among the various Chinese dialects and it fulfilled its requirements. How can you achieve that with words with fixed pronunciations? Furthermore, Mandarin Chinese is monosyllabic and precise so an alphabet doesn't benefit Mandarin a whole lot. Think of the Pinyin system with similar sounding words like Cai, Kai, Chai, Cha, Jing, Jin, Qin, Qing, Xin, Xing, Zen, Zheng, Zhen. All of them have different sounds. Granted, it is primitive and tiring to memorize so many characters but that's just the way Chinese is for thousands of years. Won't it be a shame to abandon all that history for an alphabet that is only marginally useful?
    186
  251.  @alimamybangura1399  "Soon, we are going to have in themarket:made in India,...All of those with better products than China." China is the factory of the world, and there are many successful Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Oppo, Lenovo, Vivo, DJI, BYD, Tencent, Alibaba, etc, but where are the famous companies from India to compare with?
    186
  252. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, the U.S is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    186
  253. Many Filipinos tend to have "colonial mentality". Not only were Philippines' lands colonized, but also the minds of its people were colonized. Even after the colonizer left, the people's minds remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. It's like Stockholm Syndrome.
    186
  254. They specifically chose "cotton-picking" for a reason, in order to connect the allegations of Uighur forced labor with what the USA did historically with Africans. When in fact the Uighur workers drive cotton-harvesting machines to harvest truckloads of cotton, instead of picking cotton.
    185
  255. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like USA is a threat to global peace and stability.
    184
  256. Maybe Chinese journalist should start questioning Phelps and Ledecky just like what US journalists did with Chinese swimmers. It's only fair.
    183
  257. China's Kubuqi desert solar power plant uses mirrors instead of solar panels. The mirrors focus the sun's rays onto the top of the tower (like a solar oven) rapidly heating up the molten salt contained within. Molten salt is able to absorb and retain heat energy for a long time. Even after the Sun sets, the molten salt heated up throughout the day is still able to produce power at night.
    180
  258. I remembered Nury Vittachi was featured on Daniel Dumbrill's channel, where he admitted to previously being "anti-China" in his views, until the 2019 Hong Kong riots opened his eyes and he stumbled upon Daniel's videos. Now he's revising all he said before, and taking a more open view.
    179
  259. Like Russia, the Houthis in the Red Sea are also waging a strategic war of attrition, forcing their opponent to expend their expensive munitions and missiles, and making the conflict too costly for their opponents to continue.
    177
  260. President Xi had never resorted to saying bad things about Joe Biden. In fact, during a 2021 virtual meeting, President Xi called President Biden "my old friend" according to the interpreter.
    177
  261. When a clown enters the White House, the whole government becomes a circus.
    177
  262.  user-ol3ru2kf1c  The population of Uighurs in China has actually grown.
    177
  263. Ukrainian and Russian people (together with Belarussians) are part of the same family, it's sad that brother has to fight brother.
    174
  264. The Countries With The Most STEM (Science, Tech, Engineering & Math) Graduates in 2016 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... (Source: Statista)
    173
  265. China recognized Uighur culture and even submitted an application for Uighur culture (Uyghur Muqam of Xinjiang) to be recognized as a UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage.
    172
  266. President Xi offered to extend the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy to include Taiwan, allowing Taiwan to keep their government, their currency, their passport, even keep their army, but be considered as having reunified with China. No other country apart from China, allows multiple different political systems to exist within their borders.
    172
  267.  @billyehh  "2008 – Russian-Georgian war" Turns out that it was Georgia that started the war with Russia, according to a reported commissioned by the European Union. ... (Source: Reuters: Georgia started war with Russia: EU-backed report)
    171
  268. If Cyrus claims Israel has a "right to self-defense" then Palestine also has the right to armed struggle against the occupying power. Armed resistance against the occupying power is a fact that is acknowledged by international humanitarian law conventions.
    169
  269. China seeks win-win cooperation whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    169
  270. China seeks win-win cooperation, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    168
  271. Philippines was colonized both physically as well as mentally. This mental colonization created an internalized perception among Filipinos that the culture, language and values of the colonizer are inherently superior over that of other cultures (including their own). Even after Philippines was granted independence, the minds of its people remain enslaved and loyal towards their former masters. Because the mental shackles remain even if the physical shackles are broken.
    167
  272. United States: "We will not be sending officials to the Beijing Olympics!" Other 5 Eyes countries: "Us too!" United States: "Just kidding! We will be sending 18 officials to attend the Beijing Olympics" Other 5 Eyes: "Wait... what? What do we do now? How do we explain our boycott to Beijing?"
    166
  273. When American diplomats visit other countries, they talk about how to contain China. When Chinese diplomats visit other countries, they talk about win-win cooperation.
    165
  274. In fact, the population of Uighurs in Xinjiang grew by 25% from 2010 to 2018. Some "genocide" where the Uighur population actually increased in size. Unlike the one that's actually happening in Gaza, doesn't Marco Rubio have anything to say about that?
    164
  275. In the end, even President Trump acknowledge the One-China Policy, just like Obama before him and Bush and four decades of previous US presidents. Many major countries in the world also officially do not recognize Taiwan as independent.
    163
  276. Taiwan's ability to hold out stems from perceived US support. But as long as peace prevails, the US will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise, by which then its support for Taiwan will evaporate and reunification is inevitable.
    162
  277. If a lie gets repeated long enough, the lie itself starts believing it Israel. (Get it? Believing it IS REAL?)
    161
  278. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    161
  279. It's a shame that Italy is exiting the Belt and Road Initiative, when many Chinese mainlanders tend to have a good impression of Italian brand clothing, bags, shoes and fashion. In fact, the 10 most favored Italian brands by Chinese consumers are BVLGARI, Gucci, Bottega Veneta, Fendi, Prada, Armani, LoroPiana, Max Mara, Valentino and Brunello Cucinelli.
    160
  280. Zelenskyy: "You promised to support Ukraine until the end!" Biden: "This IS the end."
    159
  281. Colonialism of the Philippines may be over, but coloniality remains in the minds of its people. Coloniality is the perception that Western culture and language is inherently superior to that of other cultures (including their own local cultures). Even after the colonizer left, the minds of the local people remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. Coloniality is still present today in the minds of people from former colonies (such as Philippines, India and even Hong Kong).
    158
  282. It didn't have to be this way. Where China sees win-win cooperation for mutual gain, the US only sees a zero sum game.
    158
  283. True NGOs have nothing to fear from a new law calling for increased transparency in where they obtain their funds from. Otherwise, they don't deserve to be called nongovernmental organisations.
    156
  284. The border dispute between India and China can be resolved if the McMahon line (drawn by British cartographer Henry McMahon) is disregarded, and the boundaries are redrawn according to historical borders between India and China.
    155
  285. The Kindergarten is home to many school kids and the barbed wire is meant to keep out potential trespassers or kidnappers who may attempt to infiltrate the schools to harm the kids or abduct them, possibly into child trafficking and selling them off as slaves.
    154
  286. Fortune Top 500 companies as of August 2023: 1. China (143) 2. United States (136) 3. Japan (41) 4. Germany (30) 5. France (24) 6. South Korea (14) 7. United Kingdom (15) 8. Canada (18) 9. Switzerland (11) 10. Netherlands (10)
    154
  287. It's a combination of the “Red Scare” (fear of communism) and the “Yellow Peril” (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling fears towards China in the West.
    154
  288. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. Whereas many Westerners tend to be pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    153
  289.  @aribethdetylmarande8228  The Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again, which government body is?) but despite its initial setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates fell. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country like India in the past, but today, China is world's 2nd largest economy, the manufacturing hub of the world, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, and funded by world's 2nd largest military budget. All while under the CCP leadership. Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm
    153
  290. The IDF has dropped more than 25,000 tons of ordinance on Gaza since Oct 7, which is the equivalent of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
    152
  291. China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    152
  292.  @TheEVEInspiration  "So it's not all economic sunshine and roses in China." The Chinese economy expanded by 6.3% year-on-year in Q2 2023, showing faster growth compared to the 4.5% recorded in Q1.
    151
  293. Exactly. Many Indians (but not all) tend to have a "colonial mentality" of worshipping Anglo Saxon culture as a result of being colonized by the British. Back when the British first arrived on India's shores, India made up 25% of the world's GDP. By the time the British left, India's share of the global GDP made up only 4%. They should ask the question where has India's wealth gone?
    151
  294. Trump already made it clear that he was willing to use Meng's arrest as a "bargaining chip" against China for his trade deal, this shows that the U.S. isn't interested in "justice" if they can so easily barter away the offender. Even the new Biden Administration hasn't so much as uttered a word to Canadian PM Trudeu over what to do with Meng, so more Canadians need to realize that the U.S is just using Meng to deteriorate Canadian-China relations.
    149
  295. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2022, and China's economy is still going strong.
    149
  296. The Chinese Communist Party has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's direction and future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc. By abolishing the Presidential Term limit, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see these plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. But countries like US have 4-8 year president term limit, so their presidents can't only make long-term plans for America spanning more than 10 years.
    148
  297. China: "Know your enemy, know yourself." USA: "The enemy can't know my plans, if I myself don't know!"
    148
  298.  @lianaintan3483  After Pan Zhanle won, a new skin tone has appeared, the angry purple tribe 👿
    147
  299. 我们要继续努力，为中国创造更美好的未来！🇨🇳 We must continue our efforts to build a better future for China! 🇨🇳
    147
  300. Hopefully the people of Taiwan island learn from Ukraine what happens when you have the US as an "ally."
    147
  301. I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad in the United States, and I was appalled at the fear and paranoia many Americans (but not all) hold towards China and Chinese people. Whenever I try to bring up China's positive achievements like lifting millions out of poverty, some Americans (but not all) just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill, and some even took it a step further and told me to "Go back to China!". Obviously, not all Westerners are like that.
    147
  302. Even Janet Yellen stated that a decoupling of the US and Chinese economies would be virtually impossible.
    146
  303. ​ @LoveWatchingNDEs  Russia and China are calling for de-escalation and peace. Meanwhile, US is sending military aid to Israel.
    146
  304. Furthermore, Chinese government media go the extra mile to promote ethnic minority culture. CGTN and CCTV have many videos of Uighurs dressed in traditional Uighur clothing (the chapan and the doppa) enjoying Uighur cuisine (Uighur flatbread and skewers) while singing and dancing and playing traditional Uighur instruments.
    144
  305. The United States banned Google in Huawei, so Huawi came up with HarmonyOS. There is opportunity in adversity.
    144
  306. China: Cyberspace is becoming Reality. United States: Reality is becoming Cyberspace.
    144
  307.  @windvlaag4404  Universal virtues indeed, yet seemingly absent in some Western athletes after they've lost to Chinese athletes.
    144
  308. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    144
  309. A France-based International Federation for Human Rights, that's actually pushing U.S foreign policy objectives in Laos is a prime example of neo-colonialism at work
    143
  310. The American Dream is about individualistic accomplishments, where it's every individual for themselves. The Chinese Dream is the rejuvenation of the Chinese civilization. It's about collective accomplishments as a nation.
    142
  311. An actor and a Reality TV host putting up a show in the White House to entertain the audience and keep them speculating over the next episode.
    141
  312. I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, and I was astounded at how many Westerners (but not all) already seemingly harbor a negative opinion of China without having set foot here.
    138
  313. The unipolar world is dying and the multipolar world is being born.
    137
  314. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go, (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    134
  315. USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    134
  316. Zelenskyy: "You promised to support Ukraine until the end!" Biden: "This IS the end!"
    133
  317. Instead of outright military colonialism, the United States is resorting to using other methods to achieve the same imperialistic objective.
    133
  318. China actually invited Mike Pompeo to visit Xinjiang and see for himself that there are no human rights violations in Xinjiang. But Pompeo declined China's invitation.
    133
  319. Actually, China already planned ahead to punish North Korean missile testing, but held off until the meeting with President Trump. Then during the meeting, President Xi Jinping appeared "convinced" by President Trump and agree to put pressure N.K in return for better trade deals with USA. So now, N. K thinks China is punishing them because of USA, and Trump thinks he managed to convince China of N. K threat and China gets better trade deals with USA. Pretty sweet deal!~😁😁
    132
  320. The world is a board game in which USA is playing Checkers, thinking ahead by 1 move. Russia is playing Chess, thinking ahead by 5 moves. Whereas China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking ahead by 10 moves.
    132
  321. Every cloud has a silver lining... except the mushroom-shaped ones.
    131
  322. Many Chinese warmly welcome foreigners to China as visitors. However, many in the West are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands as unwelcome.
    131
  323.  MrKin-od8dr  They achieve that primarily by keeping Germany down.
    130
  324. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    130
  325. The problem is that there is no guarantee that Omicron will be the last Covid-19 variant, there might be a new mutated strain that combines the transmissiblity of Omicron with the fatality rate of Delta. The best step would be to minimize the transmission in order to stop new variants from emerging.
    129
  326. USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    129
  327. Even Janet Yellen stated that a decoupling of the US and Chinese economies would be virtually impossible.
    129
  328. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? ... Yet China's economy is still going strong.
    128
  329. "It's easier to fool a man, than to convince him that he's been fooled."
    127
  330.  @WONGKHAIHONGMoe  Africa's entire population of 1.3 billion is nothing to sneeze at either.
    126
  331. Using Winnie the Pooh (a yellow bear with small eyes) to refer to a Chinese man, is borderline racist in itself.
    126
  332.  @MarkYeung1  Russia is calling for a UN investigation into the targeting of gas pipelines like Nordstream II.
    126
  333.  @BrianOblivionB  There've been plenty of wars in the unipolar world, such as Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, etc, because the US sees it as a zero sum game. Whereas the multipolar world by Russia and China is interested in win-win cooperation.
    125
  334. As of August 2023, 155 countries have signed up to the Belt and Road Initiative, and participating countries include almost 75% of the world's population and account for more than half of the world's GDP.
    124
  335.  @Birdylockso  "Shenzhou. Maybe because all the employees are owned by the state?" If that was really the case, then there why are Chinese able to travel? You really think the government owns all 1.4 billion people in China?
    124
  336. BRICS welcoming the multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US's).
    124
  337. Indeed. Brian Berletic at The New Atlas channel goes into detail on the U.S backed separatist movements from Myanmar to Thailand.
    123
  338. China's digital Renminbi allows short term visitors to China to enjoy the convience WeChat/Alipay all without setting up a Chinese bank account, so hopefully it will draw more international tourists to China.
    123
  339. Canada, Mexico and the EU were taken by surprise by Trump's tariffs. Whereas China has been preparing for additional tariffs since Trump's first term and is responding accordingly.
    121
  340. "To be an enemy of the US is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal." — Henry Kissinger
    121
  341. "If data were petroleum in the artificial intelligence era, then China would be Saudi Arabia." - Kai-Fu Lee
    121
  342. To experience the past 3,000 years of Chinese history, visit Xi'an (西安). To experience the past 300 years of Chinese history, visit Beijing (北京). To experience the past 30 years of Chinese history, visit Shanghai (上海). To experience the future, visit Shenzhen (深圳). To experience "cyberpunk" hi-tech buildings next to old-school style architecture, visit Chongqing (重庆).
    121
  343. Previously, Japan actually benefited much from Sinocentrism. The Japanese kimono had its origins in the Han Chinese clothing (Hanfu 汉服). Even Japanese (Kanji 漢字) were derived from Chinese characters (Hanzi). The traditional Japanese tea ceremony also had origins in China, even the famous Japanese katana was derived from Tang Dynasty blades coming from China.
    121
  344. Some expats that have lived in China for several years, often remarked how traveling back to their home countries in the West is like "traveling backwards in time" to the past.
    120
  345. The term "commonwealth" is associated with the colonial powers. Some say it's an attempt by Britain to retain some degree of control over its former colonies, of which Singapore happens to be one. This may be why this former Singapore politician thinks it's a great idea, but China is a civilization state with 5,000 years of history, culture and way of thinking. In Chinese minds, the best solution is still reunification through the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy.
    120
  346. When they can just keep on printing dollars with impunity, eventually the rest of the world will catch on and start de-dollarizing.
    120
  347. US is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    119
  348. China seeks win-win cooperation, whereas the United States only sees a zero sum game.
    119
  349.  Beast Mode  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    119
  350. Eventually the rest of the world followed China with paper money. Likewise the rest of the world will follow China with digital currency.
    119
  351. The Three Gorges Dam generates hydroelectric power equivalent to burning 50 million tons of coal and producing 100 million tons of CO2 annually.
    119
  352. China was once a dirt-poor, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (the largest if you go by PPP), the factory of the world, having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the CPC.
    117
  353. Netanyahu doesn't seem to care about the Israeli hostages that are still under Hamas. Shouldn't a leader put the safety of his own people first ahead? Any opportunity to negotiate for their release should be grasped.
    117
  354. Palestinians have a right to armed struggle against the occupying power. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 37/43 affirmed the legitimacy of the struggle for independence, territorial integrity, national unity, and liberation from foreign domination and foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle.
    116
  355. Ukrainian soldiers actually admit that the Russians dig deeper trenches. They prefer trenches dug by Russians because they are deeper and provide more defense than their own trenches.
    116
  356. How to avoid WWIII: Rule No. 1: Don't March on Moscow. Rule No. 2: Don't Bluff Beijing. Rule No. 3: Don't Test Tehran.
    115
  357. If USA impose tariffs against China, then it only makes USA less competitive, and encourage China to seek out other trade partners elsewhere.
    115
  358. Thanks for pointing out the seemingly "double-standards" when it comes to privacy protection when China does it, compared to when Facebook (Meta) does it.
    115
  359. Chinese kid's most popular aspiration is to be an astronaut. American kid's most popular aspiration is to be a YouTuber. (This according to a 2019 survey.)
    115
  360. The population of Uighurs in Xinjiang grew by 25% from 2010 to 2018. Some "genocide" where the Uighur population actually increased in size.
    115
  361. "Lifting a stone to aim at someone, only to drop it on one's own feet." – Chinese idiom That's what's Trump's tariffs are doing to the United States.
    114
  362. Many Chinese are optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners (but not all) are pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    113
  363. In the west, you can criticize Jesus Christ, but you can't do the same to Israel.
    113
  364. Some pro-Ukrainian people claimed Russian forces were pushed back from Kiev in the early days of the special military operation. However, it turns out that, Russian forces had withdrawn from Kiev as a gesture of good will in order to facilitate peace talks. Talks that were later torpedoed by Boris Johnson.
    113
  365.  @alexng7583  So the best solution is silver-plated/chrome-plated iron then, in order to retain the strength of iron, while improving resistance to corrosion.
    113
  366. China delivers infrastructure, while the US delivers lectures on human rights.
    112
  367. When the lie continually gets repeated, it takes on a life of its own, and the lie starts to think it Israel. (It's a pun. Sounds like "the lie thinks it IS REAL")
    112
  368. China publishes more scientific and technical journal articles than any other in the world since 2020. 1. China (744,042) 2. United States (624,554) 3. United Kingdom (198,500) 4. India (191,590) 5. Germany (174,524)
    112
  369. Israel only allows two trucks carrying fuel into Gaza a day, but how long can a population of 2 million Palestine survive off two fuel trucks?
    111
  370.  @zetristan4525  China help Vietnamese fight for independence from France. During the 1st Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons (ranging from artillery guns, ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help Vietnam fight for independence.
    111
  371. China actually pay attention and listen to the concerns of smaller countries (i.e climate change, economic issues, etc) and formulate win-win deals. Whereas the U.S don't really listen to the smaller countries, as long as they can use them as pawns to maintain its global hegemonic interests.
    110
  372. Western style democracy is when the Georgian President (born in France) announces she would not recognize the election result and that she will not be stepping down from her position.
    109
  373. Uighurs in Xinjiang celebrate traditional festivals while dressed in traditional Uighur clothing, eating Uighur cuisine like naan (Uighur flatbread) and kebabs, singing Uighur songs, dancing and playing traditional Uighur instruments.
    109
  374. There's new footage which suggests the "civilian" casualties on Oct 7 could have been cause by crossfire from the IDF.
    109
  375. +tesko radic Many different ways. Here are a some examples: 日= Day, 月 = Moon -> 明 = Tomorrow (after 1 day and 1 night) 田=Field, 木=Tree -> 果 = Fruit (Harvest of the Trees) 子 = Child, 老 = Elder -> 孝 = Filial (Elder supported by Son) 文 = Culture -> 教 = Teach (Elder teaching Son about Culture) 火= Fire -> 灭 = Extinguish (Cover Fire and it dies, also means destroy) 衣 = Clothing, 皮 = Skin - > 被 = Blanket (Skin-like Clothing) 爫 = (Represents a grasping hand) -> 采 = Pick/Pluck (Hand over Plant) 艹 = Grass -> 菜 = Vegetables (the Grass your Hand picks up)
    108
  376. China's coronavirus response: Save lives at the expense of businesses. United State's coronavirus response: Save businesses at the expense of lives.
    108
  377. Also, the US sanctions have never worked in Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, North Korea, Russia, etc, and those countries are forming part of the new multipolar world that's emerging.
    108
  378.  @mbr8167  Experts have debunked the debt trap as myth. Research has shown that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country.
    108
  379. When the lie gets repeated so often, eventually the lie starts to think it Israel. (It's a pun. Sounds like "the lie starts to think it IS REAL.")
    108
  380. USA's version would be (in the words of Mike Pompeo): "We lied, we cheated, we stole."
    107
  381. Chinese: "Welcome to China!" Americans: "Go back to China!"
    107
  382. At the current development, Indian families having more kids means having more mouths to feed, more potential childhood sickness, and not every Indian family has the resources to send all their kids to school. That's why India has high child malnutrition, high child mortality rate and low literacy rates.
    107
  383. Ukraine should just print out its own surrender treaty, sign it and send it to Russia as soon as possible.
    106
  384. The world has become a board game in which, USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead, Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead, China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    105
  385. Zelenskyy should sue for peace if he truly wants what's best for Ukraine.
    105
  386. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go, (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    105
  387. I agree with you that Amnesty International should be looking into the matter of the U.S dronestrike killing an Afghan family (including kids), if they want to live up to their so-called reputation of upholding human rights.
    105
  388. Undoubtedly, most of them would never even hear of these engineering marvels at all, let alone see them and experience them.
    104
  389.  @relaxwhc  Chairman Mao is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period for 37 years. Aren't Americans also proud of their founding fathers? And I have never glorified the Great Chinese Famine, what are you talking about? I have stated that bad weather conditions like flood and drought caused destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvests and mass starvation, how is that "glorifying" the Great Famine?
    104
  390. With the U.S sanctions, it's kinda like a boxing match where the U.S is too busy punching himself in the face, while China is busy training and doing push-ups.
    104
  391. In Western culture, wearing a mask in public is perceived as being selfish, it's like you're protecting yourself from catching other people's illness. In Eastern culture, wearing a mask in public is seen as being polite, it's like you're protecting others from catching your illness.
    104
  392. NATO was initially formed in response to Soviet Union's rising military might. But after the USSR collapse in 1991, NATO no longer serves any interests (except perhaps the US's) and NATO is most certainly not a defensive alliance like often claimed.
    103
  393. I miss the old weekly show where you, Daniel Dumbrill, Jayoe Nation and others would just simply talk about China. Seems like a lifetime ago.
    103
  394. Question: How many Uighur refugees has the United States accepted? Answer: US has admitted a grand total of zero Uyghur refugees in the past two fiscal years since 2021.
    103
  395. Meng Wanzhou has been effectively kidnapped without ransom by the U.S.A and Canada. There's no named price (whether a hefty fine or some other compensation) to get U.S.A and Canada to release the hostage.
    103
  396. When your representative can tell the UN Secretary General to resign, that's how you know you are the most privileged member in the UN.
    103
  397. Brian, you're doing us all a great service providing updates on Ukraine. I'm sure I speak for many, when I say we are all starved for alternative political takes of the Russo-Ukraine crisis apart from the Western mainstream media.
    103
  398. Many Filipinos tend to have "colonial mentality". Not only were Philippines' lands colonized, but also the minds of its people were colonized. Even after the colonizer left, the people's minds remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. It's like Stockholm Syndrome.
    103
  399. Many Chinese warmly welcome foreigners to our lands as visitors, whereas many Westerners are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands as unwelcome.
    103
  400. Show the words "tree", "woods" and "forest" to a non-English speaker and they will have a hard time figuring out which one is biggest. Show 木, 林, 森 to a non-Chinese speaker and even a child can get it right!
    102
  401. Blinken can lie without blinking.
    102
  402. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today, and the CPC has transformed China into the world's 2nd largest economy (world's largest if you go by PPP), the factory of the world, having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, producing the most STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) graduates in the world, as well as a space-exploring nation.
    102
  403. Likewise, the G7 countries imposing a price cap on Russian oil, simply goes against the principles of a free market that the Western countries believe in.
    102
  404. The West should be looking for an off-ramp in Ukraine, not continuing to climb up the escalator ladder.
    102
  405. The American-Philippine War resulted in the tragic deaths of some 250,000 Filipino civilians. And it started because America had promised Philippines independence from Spain if they aided the U.S. But after the U.S-Spanish War, the Americans went back on their word, and took the Philippines as a colony for themselves.
    101
  406. Putin and Xi enjoy a high level of approval from the people of Russia and China respectively. On the other hand, the approvals of many leaders in the West are at an all time low.
    101
  407. One of core Chinese cultural traits is the ability to endure hardship (i.e 吃苦). It is this resiliency that enables China to weather economic and political storms as well as persevere through difficult times.
    101
  408. Colonial mentality is what happens when a people view their own culture, language and values as 'backward' and try to adhere to the culture, language and values of their colonial master. The mentally colonised do not adapt ideas to their own reality, instead they try to live in other people's reality (namely in that of their former master's). It's a kind of Stockholm Syndrome.
    100
  409. I've noticed that many Western movies and literature tends to portray the negative aspects of AI and robots, in the form of dystopian futures where robots control humans, (Matrix, Terminator, etc) whereas in Eastern media (including Japanese anime), AI and robots are often portrayed as positive, (such as Astro Boy). It's the different viewpoints of Eastern and Western cultures.
    100
  410.  user-ol3ru2kf1c  The population of Uighurs in China has actually grown, what more needs to be said?
    100
  411. It's tragic that these young activists get swept up by misguided political fervor, when in actuality they're serving foreign interests.
    99
  412.  @tooltalk  China has brokered peace between Saudi Arabia and Iran, how is China not about peace?
    99
  413. Instead of calling for a outright ceasefire, many western leaders just use the term "humanitarian pause" which is just a euphemism.
    99
  414. China seeks win-win cooperation while the United States only sees a zero sum game.
    99
  415. 12:00 Russia having the smallest average apartment in the world doesn't mean that the Russian people do not enjoy good lives. For example, Russia has a home ownership rate of 92% compared to US home ownership rate of 65%.
    99
  416. In a poll of nearly 7500 readers by the United Daily News (Taiwan Newspaper) website, 61% said the trip was not welcome as it may destabilise the Taiwan Strait. Only 38% welcomed the visit and said it had more advantages than disadvantages.
    99
  417. What doesn't kill you, only makes you stronger. Even though Google's Android OS was banned from being installed on Huawei products, it led to Huawei developing its own domestic OS, called HarmonyOS, to replace Android OS. This chip ban on China is only going to result in the same thing, which is China developing domestic chips of our own.
    98
  418. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country since our last conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, etc in other developing countries through the Belt and Road Initiative. Whereas the U.S is a warmonger, having been involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Syrian War, Afghan War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century.
    98
  419. Many Chinese are optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. 90% of people in China feel that the country is on the right track (according to survey by WEF). However, many in the West are growing pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy view of the future.
    98
  420. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the U.S is a threat to global peace and stability.
    97
  421. During the 19th century, Britain was a colonial superpower. During the 20th century, the United States overtook Britain as a superpower. But from 1-1800 AD, China (and India) were superpowers who made up 25% of the world's GDP at that time. ...Also, in the 21st century, China is expected to overtake the USA.
    97
  422. Footage of the events Oct 7th has revealed that many civilians were in fact killed in the crossfire from the IDF.
    97
  423. Canada and Mexico were taken by surprise by Trump's tariffs. Whereas China has been preparing for additional tariffs since Trump's first term.
    97
  424. It's the story of the Tortoise and the Hare. NATO is behaving like the Hare, throwing everything they have at Russia (from sanctions to sending weapons to Ukraine) and exhausting themselves even before reaching the finish line, yet they mock the Russian advancement as slow. Russia is behaving like the Tortoise, having weathered the worst of the sanctions yet still making slow but incremental progress towards the finish line.
    96
  425. It's no secret that the West is in decline and China is rising. Since the 19th century, many have grown accustomed to Western dominance, such that the thought of China surpassing the USA someday in the foreseeable future is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    96
  426. Even Chinese actress Fan Bingbing has become Melaka's tourism ambassador in Malaysia.
    96
  427.  @2funny269  Cyrus wants Taiwan to choose peace instead of conflict, and not listen to US rhetoric like what Ukraine did.
    95
  428.  @Gobsmacked52  Russia has thousands of years of history, in which they've been under authoritarian forms of governance. Same goes for China having 5,000 years of history always being under a strong central government. Such a system has worked for Russia and for China, then can't such a system continue to thrive in our countries? Nobody said that every country has to adopt Western-style democracy to be successful.
    95
  429.  @zetristan4525  Funny how on one hand, you complain my comments aren't original in another post, yet here you are literally copying my post and trying to make it your own. What's wrong with posting on Cyrus' Comments section? Aren't you also doing the same here? And if you find my comments lacking, why don't you post a comment of your own that contains "constructive balanced accuracy"?
    95
  430. "If you have no money, at least give me credit." - Zelenskyy * No one's giving him any credit either way *
    95
  431. Tik Tok is one of the world's most downloaded app worldwide with 47 million downloads in Dec 2023. No wonder why those people can't resist taking a bite of the pie.
    94
  432. It's astonishing just how bold and blatant the statements posted by these people who seek to control other countries autonomy.
    94
  433. USA: "We will support Ukraine for as long as it takes!" After the events on Oct 7. USA: "We will support Ukraine for as long as we can!"
    94
  434. Ukraine has been supporting ultra-nationalist, neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion that's carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Luhansk and Donetsk. Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that was started since the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukovych by USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine.
    93
  435. Same here. I had the opportunity to study abroad and learn English. But I was appalled at the rising levels of anti-China sentiment in the West. Whenever I bring up China's achievements under the CPC, some Westerners (but not all) laughed at me, called me brain washed, even though many of them never actually set foot in China themselves.
    93
  436. China's adult literacy rate is 99%. United State's adult literacy rate is 79%.
    92
  437. Cyrus, if you claim Israel has a "right to self-defense" then shouldn't you also acknowledge Palestine's right to armed struggle against the occupying power? Armed resistance against the occupying power is a fact that is acknowledged by international humanitarian law conventions.
    92
  438. The Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit. Whereas in USA the US corporations control the U.S government for war and profit.
    92
  439. Thank you for dispelling the rumors that Chinese company overseas only make use of Chinese labor.
    91
  440. Here's an analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Crimea had opted to rejoin the father. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they still gave Ukraine a false sense of hope. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    91
  441. War's already won. The question is how will peace be won?
    91
  442. In reality, the USA is actually the world's most protectionist country. USA implemented over 800 protectionist policies since 2008 (according to Global Trade Alert), whereas China only has 200-300 of such policies.
    91
  443. They'll probably say: "We're here for the oil."
    91
  444. "In the age of AI, data is the new oil. And China is the new Saudi Arabia." - Lee Kai-Fu, Chinese venture capitalist.
    90
  445.  @snow-uq4gx  In a poll of nearly 7500 readers by the United Daily News (Taiwan Newspaper) website, 61 percent said the trip was not welcome as it may destabilise the Taiwan Strait. Only 38 percent welcomed the visit and said it had more advantages than disadvantages.
    90
  446. U.S is printing dollars backed by nothing. It's like that cartoon where Coyote chases Road Runner off a cliff and continues running on mid-air. When gravity finally catches up with him, that's when the USD will fall.
    90
  447. North Korea launched a warhead directly across Japanese airspace to remind them what its like to be the target of nuclear weapons.
    90
  448. Ultimately, it's up to Chinese people ourselves to ensure that no harm will befall China. President Xi Jinping said: "In this world, there are no heroes who fall down from the sky, only ordinary people who step forth." (世上没有从天而降的英雄，只有挺身而出的凡人。)
    90
  449. +Anonymous Panacea There were numerous firsthand accounts by foreigners in Nanjing, such as Nazi businessman John Rabe, American missionary John Magee, Reverend James M. McCallum, a surgeon at the university hospital named Robert O. Wilson, and many other people who survived the Rape of Nanjing, on the atrocities commited by Japanese soldiers at Nanjing. Even some living Japanese soldiers today recounted stories about the atrocities committed by themselves at Nanjing, as shown in the following video. Video:'Nanking' with Woody Harrelson - Full Movie youtube.com/watch?v=jfkk-GtM_sI
    90
  450. People can easily name famous Chinese companies like Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, Huawei, Xiaomi, Vivo, Lenovo, Oppo, ZTE, DJI, BYD, etc. But how many can name famous Indian companies?
    89
  451. Perhaps India's biggest obstacle is its mindset. Many Indians (but not all) still retain the colonial mentality of worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture.
    89
  452. China is both a 5,000 year old civilization state as well as a modern space nation.
    89
  453. Yes, and its still ongoing today.
    88
  454. Industrialization and building supply chains takes time. Even China took 4 decades to industrialize and build supply chains. How's Trump going to industrialize America in just 4 years?
    88
  455. Even Apple has found that it was unable to turn a profit making iPhones in India. Apple supplier Wistron has reportedly shut down iPhone production in India as it was struggling to make profits in the region under Apple's terms.
    88
  456. Traditionally, it's been country with the world's largest economy that holds the world's reserve currency. In the 19th century, it was Great Britain and the Pound Sterling. In the 20th century, it was the United States and the U.S Dollar. In the 21st century, it's expected that China's economy will overtake the U.S's and with that, the Renminbi might potentially become the world reserve.
    88
  457. Ancient China invented Paper Currency, and gradually the rest of the world followed suit and adopted paper currency. Now China has launched Digital Currency, and it's only a matter of time until the rest of the world follows.
    88
  458. According to UNESCO, China ranks the world's 2nd in total number of World Heritage sites, just behind Italy. So unless you are Italian yourself, then China has more UNESCO World Heritage sites than your country.
    88
  459.  @Sean-giang  Yes it has. CPEC has created 192,000 jobs, 6,000MW of power supply, 510km of highway, and 886km of transmission line for Pakistan.
    88
  460. China was once a poor, war-torn, starving nation in the past, but fast forward till today, and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (largest if you go by GDP PPP), the factory of the world, having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the CPC.
    88
  461. Nancy Pelosi is like a modern day Helen of Troy, except that it's her visit that launched a thousand ships, certainly not her face.
    87
  462. Elections should be called in Pakistan, giving them the power to vote Imran Khan back into power.
    87
  463. China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate it as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because the United States, European countries, and Japan requested that China first reform various tariff policies. That's why China had a late entry into WTO in 2001, instead of being a WTO founding member in 1995. When China joined the WTO, it agreed to considerably harsher conditions than other developing countries.
    87
  464. Afghanistan had $7 billion of their foreign reserves frozen by the U.S Russia had $300 billion of their foreign reserves frozen by the U.S This is how the dollar is being weaponized and clearly and alternative is needed.
    87
  465. Russia and China are facilitating the global transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world, dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and its "allies".)
    87
  466. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    87
  467.  @davidkottman3440  Taiwan is an inalienable part of China under the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 constitution and China will not allow separatist forces to divide our country. Even Taiwan's own constitution under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 acknowledges that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to their constitution, nor a formal declaration of independence, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    87
  468. Studies have shown that gasoline cars actually catch fire more often than electric cars. In 2018, there were only 0.1 fires per billion miles travelled by EVs, compared to 0.2 fires per billion miles traveled by gasoline cars, according to a report by the U.S National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
    86
  469. China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain, while the US only sees a zero sum game.
    86
  470. At 19:00 he said: "I support the multipolar world. But what has multipolarity have to do with Gaza?" Multipolarity means taking a view that's different from the unipolar one and that's precisely what countries like Russia and China are doing. If not for Russia and China, there would be unopposed support for Israel's actions in Gaza, and that is unipolarity.
    86
  471.  @TeleeFONE  How exactly did Han Chinese killed the Malays in Singapore and then took over? When the British arrived in Singapore, wasn't Singapore (or Temasek) already under the control of Malay Sultan Tengku Abdul Rahman? Didn't British Sir Raffles sign treaty with Malay Sultan Abdul Rahman? So how exactly did Han Chinese overrun Singapore, when the Malays called all the shots back then?
    86
  472. Putin told Biden: "Don't be mad at the mirror if you are ugly." (Russian proverb)
    86
  473.  @chrishamlin5863  Sad that buildings and bridges in the US are falling down.
    86
  474.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  I did mentioned that I took the analogy off Weibo didn't I?
    86
  475. When a clown enters the White House, the whole government becomes a circus.
    85
  476. Turkey officially changed its name to Türkiye at the United Nations, which is the name of their country according to their language.
    85
  477. China seeks win-win cooperation, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    84
  478. US has over 400+ overseas bases located across Okinawa Japan, South Korea, Philippines, etc, whereas China only has less than a handful of overseas bases.
    84
  479.  user-bz4tw3bu9u  The Hundred Years of Humiliation will be resolved once Taiwan is fully reunified with the mainland. Taiwan represents the last piece of the Century of Humiliation that needs to be resolved.
    84
  480. Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. For example, 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. ... But its already 2019 and China's economy is still going strong. Western anti-China propaganda has been consistently proven wrong for almost 30 years already, so why do people still believe China will fail?
    84
  481.  @RandolphGrandeur  It just goes to show which country is bad at "conducting genocide," and which other country is great at it.
    83
  482. Many Westerners believe the testimonies by Uighur witnesses of the so-called atrocities, but they don't believe the Uighurs in Xinjiang denouncing Mike Pompeo on video on YouTube.
    83
  483. Here's a Chinese analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family, which in turn open up a path to her ex-husband's doorstep. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    83
  484. Zelenskyy should have sued for peace.
    83
  485. Military Intelligence is vital for soldiers seeking to go fight in Ukraine, yet many of these soldiers admit that they don't even know the situation in Ukraine. Also, it seems like Canadian snipers are still no match for Russian artillery.
    82
  486. Not sure which is more astonishing: the translation accuracy of the device, or Cyrus' multilingual capabilities.
    82
  487. Australia is located geographically closer to Asia than to America, yet it views itself as "US's Deputy Sheriff in Asia" instead of behaving like an Asian country.
    82
  488.  @cityguyable  Ukraine is one of the most core-rupt country in Europe after all. Yet the US is sending billions of dollars to Ukraine.
    82
  489. USA is the most protectionist country in the world. According to Global Trade Alert, USA had taken over 800 protectionist measures since 2008, while China's is in the range of 200-300.
    82
  490. Over the course of decades, the population of Uighurs in China actually grown from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020, yet Western allegations of genocide still persist. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953–2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 .... Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    82
  491.  @sootuckchoong7077  China is the world's largest producer of solar energy. China is the world's largest producer of solar panels as well as its deployment.
    82
  492. If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail. That's what happens when your country has the world's largest military spending.
    82
  493. China's strategy: "Know your opponent and know yourself." Trump's strategy: "If I don't even know what I am doing, then the opponent can't know me!"
    82
  494. Russia and China are facilitating the global transition towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, rather than the uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US and its "allies").
    81
  495. Putin isn't really as aggressive to the West as some may think. After all, even after the barrage of sanctions on Russia by the West, Russia still continues to supply EU countries with Russian gas till today. Also, Ukraine's modern borders were drawn up by the Bolsheviks and they included a huge chunk of Russian land (i.e Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, etc). Putin also stated that Ukrainians and Russians (and Belorussians) were "one people" that share a common heritage, known as Kievan Rus.
    81
  496.  @Darkademic  China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia eventually succumbed to history. Throughout its long history, China has witnessed the birth and death of numerous nations, the rise and fall of various empires, and survived the passage of history to modern times while largely intact. China has even made it into space, landing lunar rovers on the Moon, and launching space stations into orbit. China is both an ancient civilization, as well as modern space-exploring nation.
    81
  497. Many Filipinos (but not all of them) tend to have the colonial mentality. Colonial mentality is the internalized perception of ethnic and cultural inferiority as a result of colonization. They have an ingrained preference for Anglo Saxon culture over any "non-white" culture, including their own.
    81
  498. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners are increasingly pessimistic and tend to a have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    81
  499. Larger populations do have more geniuses, and since China's population is about 4.3 times that of the US population, then statistically speaking, there are 4 Chinese geniuses for every 1 American genius.
    81
  500.  @maddog3768  Firstly, those two events occurred at different times and one wasn't the cause of the other. Sri Lankan government found that leasing Hambantota port to Chinese companies for 99 years was a better deal than the earlier arrangement, so it did that to free up Sri Lankan revenue to channel elsewhere. In 99 years time, the lease would have expired and Hambantota port returned to Sri Lanka. The current Sri Lankan banktrupt was caused by other factors like Russo-Ukraine conflict. Japan actually holds more Sri Lankan debt compared to China.
    80
  501. China is also investing in building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, and so on in Pakistan to improve their country.
    80
  502. Meanwhile President Trump defends Saudi Arabian Crown Prince despite his involvement in journalists murder
    80
  503.  @Madame702  Reopening Embassies and reestablishing diplomatic relations is an indication of peace.
    80
  504.  @relaxwhc  You said: "Also, you lack the skill of communication." So now you're criticizing my communication skills as inadequate? Aren't you the one always going on about "Raise your hand if you support XYZ" all the time, not really contributing anything to discussion? Also from out of nowhere, you bring up LiZiQi's channel even though her channel has nothing to do with the video. You said: "And you spill too much misinformation like a Mao shill." I cite evidence and sources to support my argument where possible, how am I spreading misinformation? You can always choose to disagree with me, but there are people who resort to personal insults against me, instead of attempting to refute my points.
    80
  505. The ironic thing is that despite the U.S claims of ongoing Uighur genocide, the U.S has admitted a grand total of 0 Uighur refugees in the past 2-3 years.
    80
  506.  @ibrahim-sj2cr  You asked: "who will work in the factories if there isn't any working age people?" China is investing in robotics and automation. Already, China is the world's largest market for automation, and some Chinese ports (such as Tianjin Port) are already fully automated, using 5G cloud computing, AI and robots to operate the entire workflow.
    80
  507. It's like the Tortoise and the Hare. The Hare (Ukraine/NATO) is throwing everything into the war, exhausting themselves before even seeing the finish line. Meanwhile, the Tortoise (Russia) is conserving its strength for the final push towards the finish line.
    79
  508.  @alfredepding974  The tentacles of the National Endowment for Democracy extend far and wide. Brian's channel has enlightened many (including me) of NED's reach.
    79
  509.  @ColoniaMurder20  Taiwan was part of China since Qing Dynasty (1600 AD) at the very least. If you look up the Map of Qing Dynasty, Taiwan island is part of it.
    79
  510.  @aceshadowins1310  This multilingual Cambodian prodigy isn't even noticed by the French or English speaking nations (they don't care about Cambodians in general) so its up to Chinese government to take in and nurture this young talent in China.
    79
  511. Ancient China had invented the paper banknote, which spread to the rest of the world having paper currencies of their own. Now China is rolling out the digital Renminbi, it's only a matter of time that other countries adopt digital currencies of their own.
    79
  512. Before I went to sleep, my wife was complaining to me: "This Russia is such a bad country, if Ukraine wants to join NATO, it is their business and freedom, Russia has no right to intervene. This is just an excuse for Russia to invade Ukraine." I said nothing, got out of bed and went to the kitchen, before returning to bed with knife in my hand. I told my wife: "Let's go to sleep" Upon seeing the knife, my wife sat up abruptly and looked at me with wide eyes. "What are you doing? Sleeping with a knife?!" she exclaimed. I replied: "Don’t worry about it, let’s go to sleep. Besides, me sleeping with a knife is none of your business and it is my freedom." My wife said: "You're crazy! How can I sleep when you are lying next to me with a knife? What if you accidentally cut me?" I replied: “Well, you don’t even trust your own husband, how can you expect Russia to trust Ukraine? Sleeping with a knife is like Ukraine joining the NATO." .... An anonymous analogy taken off Weibo.
    79
  513.  @lulc4694  Likewise, Africa also has a rich history and is a cradle of human civilization. Contact with the West has deteriorated both Africa and China, with much of Africa's natural resources being exploited and its people enslaved. China too has suffered but found success through infrastructure, and perhaps one day in the future, the countries in Africa can cooperate with China to attain mutual prosperity too.
    79
  514. "Amateurs talk tactics. Professionals talk logistics"
    78
  515.  @ColoniaMurder20  The aborigine people in Taiwan were descended from farmers from mainland China that arrived on the island some 5,000 years ago. Around 5,000 years ago, farmers from the southeast Chinese coast settled on the island. These people are believed to have been speakers of Austronesian languages, which dispersed from Taiwan across the islands of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The current Taiwanese aborigines are believed to be their descendants. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan)
    78
  516. "East Turkestan" was actually coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists to replace another Western term, Chinese Turkestan.
    78
  517. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    78
  518. China used a proverb to summarized its stance. "Let he who tied the bell on the tiger, be the one to take it off" (解铃还须系铃人)
    78
  519. Russia is pegging the Ruble to gold and China is backing the digital Renminbi by gold, whereas the U.S Dollar is backed by nothing.
    78
  520. Some people still mistakenly believe that it is China that pays for the tariffs, not the consumers themselves.
    77
  521. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    77
  522. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking ahead by 1 move. Russia is playing Chess, thinking ahead by 5 moves. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋) thinking ahead by 10 moves.
    77
  523. Chinese companies form the largest business delegation at CES with over 1,300 companies, including not only major tech giants but also numerous small and medium-sized startups. Their presence spans various fields such as robotic dogs, embodied robots, AI glasses, smart home appliances, and Lidar (Light Detection and Ranging),
    77
  524. China seeks win-win cooperation while the US only sees a zero sum game.
    77
  525. I found it strange that Cyrus is keenly aware of Western MSM's attempts to frame China in a negative light to their audiences. But has he considered that Western MSM might do the same for Russia? Putin has stated that Russia has no plans to occupy Ukraine, and neither does he consider Ukrainians as ethnically Russians. Putin stated that Ukrainians and Russians (and Belorussians) were "one people" that share a common heritage that's all.
    77
  526.  @davidkottman3440  You said: "while totally disrespecting the treaty commitments made to Hong Kong when the British lease expired." Hong Kong was part of China before being taken by Great Britain and made it into a British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    77
  527. China's military production is geared towards serving China's needs. USA's military production is geared towards maximizing profits for the military-industrial complex.
    77
  528. “不患人之不己知、患不知人也。” —孔子 "Do not worry if others do not understand you. Instead worry if you do not understand others." —Confucius
    77
  529. Cyrus, if you understood Confucian virtues, then Chinese value the elderly in society, that's why China prioritize keeping elderly folk safe, even if at the cost to the economy. Loss of money and income is tragic yes, but people can always make money later aferwards. But once elderly people lost their lives, then no amount of money can buy back lives once they are gone.
    77
  530. Russia is playing Chess. The U.S is playing Checkers. China is playing Go (Weiqi 圍棋).
    76
  531. Glad to see Americans that see beyond what their MSM media is feeding them, and taking a stand towards peace and prosperity.
    76
  532. Exactly. Even though Taiwan's government has changed, the ROC's constitution remains unchanged, so reunification is still their ultimate goal.
    76
  533.  @Andrew-ib7gs  Covid-19 is like a global test that everyone has to take. China studied extremely hard for the exam and passed with flying colours and we are now celebrating our well-deserved graduation ceremony. Whereas Western countries had extra time to prepare for the test, yet many Westerners laughed at China's misfortune and mocked China's answers as too "draconian." Yet now they are accusing China of cheating, yet they are now blatantly copying China's homework after ridiculing them earlier.
    76
  534. Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    76
  535. Researchers in the West have to worry about funding, so they publish papers in order to get their papers cited and noticed by academics, and then they write and publish more papers. It's difficult for researchers to see their ideas translated into actual products. Whereas in China, the government encourages innovation and grants funding and oftentimes, researchers get to see their ideas turned into reality.
    76
  536.  @TheScotian82  The West has spent centuries in Africa, whereas China has done much to develop Africa's infrastructure in just decades.
    76
  537. The world followed China with paper money. Eventually they will do so with digital currency as well.
    76
  538. Chinese: "Welcome to China!" American: "Go back to where you came from!"
    75
  539. Previously, China was once a poor, war-torn, starving country, but fast forward till today and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (largest by GDP PPP), the factory of the world, having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army.
    75
  540.  @JYAN2852  Agreed. The irony of the U.S and EU accusing China of (potentially) sending weapons to Russia when they themselves are doing it to Ukraine. Furthermore, the U.S is sending weapons to the Chinese province of Taiwan.
    75
  541. “When you cut out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say.” - George R. R. Martin.
    75
  542.  @man-kitli1572  This analogy was taken off Weibo and translated into English to help people understand the Ukraine crisis better and make it more relatable to the average person.
    75
  543.  @olivieryeung398  If Zelenskyy truly cared about the lives of Ukrainians, he would surrender. By refusing to surrender, Zelenskyy is only prolonging the war so that more people die. By releasing prisoners and arming civilians with rifles and rocket launchers, he's encouraging chaos and trying to maximise the civilian casualties. By removing the age restrictions for conscription, Zelenskyy is effectively enlisting child soldiers to fight and die for his refusal to surrender.
    74
  544. United States: "China will take over the infrastructure they built in other countries!" Also, United States: "We're taking the Panama Canal! It was built by us!"
    74
  545.  @MarkYeung1  Sri Lanka's economic woes were caused by rising global inflation and the Russo-Ukraine conflict, so which country is Sri Lanka becoming an economic colony of?
    74
  546. Hopefully the people of Taiwan learn from the mistakes made by Ukraine and not to follow in its footsteps leading to war.
    74
  547. India has been called the "Foreign Investor's Graveyard."
    74
  548.  @mbr8167  "Our research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country, much less the port of Hambantota." ... Source: There Is No Chinese 'Debt Trap' - The Atlantic
    74
  549.  @billyehh  The increase in productivity doesn't have to be directly proportional to the labor cost. At least productivity has increased, and China's productivity is still higher than that of India's.
    74
  550.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  So you're just continuing to mock me even after I made a disclaimer that that analogy was taken off Weibo? And did I ever said that I wanted JaYoe Nation to respond?
    74
  551. It's a combination of the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (phobia of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, that the notion of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually overtaking the U.S someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    74
  552. One of the most popular Chinese actress today is Dilraba Dilmurat and she's of Uighur descent. Her fans call her Dilireba (迪丽热巴) and she has appeared in many popular Chinese dramas.
    73
  553.  @davis7428  "especially the Chinese people that are in government positions act like they are kings and queens" Have you seen how American government officials like Anthony Blinken, Jake Sullivan, John Kirby, Janet Yellen, etc behave towards China?
    73
  554. The thing is that while people in Shanghai complain about the lockdown, everyone knows that the alternative of no lockdown is going to result in widespread deaths. Loss of income and money is regrettable, but money loss can always be earned back. But once elderly lose their lives to the virus, then no amount of money can buy back lives that have been lost.
    73
  555. A multi-polar world be dominated by multiple voices, unlike the uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US and its "allies")
    73
  556. Singapore is approaching this from a colonial mentality angle. British decolonization lead to the creation of the Commonwealth of Nations, of which Singapore is a member and that's why they think this sort of system works. But China is a civilizational state with 5,000 years of history and culture and this Commonwealth system may not necessary work. The best solution is still reunification through the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy.
    73
  557. Most people in Hong Kong don't support separation/independence, but there's a few Hong Kongers that still retain the colonial mentality. Colonial mentality is the internalized perception of ethnic or cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization. Such people display an ingrained preference for Anglo-Saxon culture over other "non-white" culture, including their own. Decolonization of Hong Kong will not be complete without decolonization of the Hong Kongers' minds
    73
  558. Exactly. What doesn't kill you, only makes you stronger.
    73
  559. "Today, America is the only major developed society where the average income of the bottom 50% has gone down over a 30-year period. By contrast, in the past 40 years the Chinese people have experienced a greater improvement in their standard of living than they have experienced in 4,000 years." - Kishore Mabubani, Singaporean Diplomat.
    73
  560. China is the birthplace of East Asian civilization and Chinese culture has undoubtedly influenced many East Asian and South East Asian countries for thousands of years. It's not that Asian countries don't want to return to being sinocentric, it's just that sinocentrism took a blow during the Century of Humiliation of China by Western and Japanese powers. But with the rejuvenation of the Chinese civilization, China is bound to return to its previous status.
    73
  561. China has 5000 years of history, and is among the world's oldest continuous living civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have long since faded to history. Even in 4th millennium BCE, Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing, while most of the world still wore loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas.
    73
  562.  @distinctga5811  "The key difference between the US and China is that when the US defeats a country in combat, the people become liberated." The people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, etc certainly aren't liberated. Have you actually been to Libya? Gaddafi's Libya was arguably Africa's most prosperous democracy until the U.S reduced the country to a failed state after the Libyan war.
    73
  563.  @Uksidorgje  China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels all over the world. Russia is supplying oil and gas to the European Union (they bought 22 billion Euros of Russian oil and gas in 2024), whereas it is the United States that's targeting infrastructure such as gas pipelines (i.e Nordstream). You've got a serious case of Stockholm Syndrome there.
    73
  564. This reminds me of why Google left China because they lost majority market share to Baidu. While Google's market share climbed from 15% in mid-2006 to 31% in 2010, Baidu's shared increased its market share from 47% in mid-2006 to 64% in 2010, which is a significant lead. In the end, Google decided to withdraw from mainland China after losing majority market share to Baidu.
    73
  565. +Haruka ino During Unit 731, Japanese soldiers conducted human experiments on Chinese prisoners, including men, women and children. Prisoners were subjected to live vivisection after infecting them with various diseases, and often without anesthesia and usually ending with their death. Organs were removed, limbs frozen and amputated, and reattached to opposite sides of the body, while the subject is kept alive, because it was thought that death will affect the results. Some prisoners even had their stomachs removed and their gullet attached to their intestines, just to see how long humans can survive without the stomach. Japanese scientists experimented with sexually transmitted diseases, by injecting prisoners and forcing them to spread the disease to other people at gunpoint. Women were raped and impregnated (sometimes by Japanese themselves) and then vivisected at various stages to study the effects of diseases on their organs, or on their pregnancy. Japanese scientists literally raped prisoners and then had experiments conducted on unborn children they fathered with female prisoners. Can you imagine if you are woman in Unit 731? Or imagine you are a man injected with STD and forced to have sex at gunpoint to spread it to other prisoners? Why not simply inject everyone with STD in the first place instead? All Chinese people wanted to do was defend our lands and protect our loved ones that's all. But Japanese invaded our lands, stole our territory, killed our men, raped our women and conducted scientific experiments on our children.
    73
  566.  @lesleyriseam1282  In fact, I would wager that Chinese know more about the West than the West knows about China.
    72
  567. Taiwan's ability to hold out stems from perceived U.S support. But as long as peace prevails in the Taiwan Strait, the US will decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise, by which Taiwan's backing will evaporate and reunification will be inevitable.
    72
  568. Rule No. 4: Don't Worship Washington.
    72
  569. Taiwan was actually at its most prosperous while under authoritarian single-party KMT rule. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    72
  570. Biden: "We will support Ukraine for as long as it takes." After the events of Oct 7, Biden: "We will support Ukraine for as long as we can take."
    72
  571. Likewise, it's also the US' trade war on Mexico, Canada, and the EU respectively.
    72
  572. "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole." — Mike Pompeo
    71
  573. Also to stop investing in wars and to dismantle the military industrial complex.
    71
  574.  @RoanShip  China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest continuous civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt, Mesopotamia eventually succumbed to history. Throughout our long history, China has witness the rise and fall of numerous other empires, and yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact.
    71
  575. China sees win-win cooperation. U.S sees a zero sum game.
    71
  576. It's no secret that United States is in decline, and China is rising. Since the 19th century, many have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much that the thought of a non-Western country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    70
  577. ASEAN's current challenge is the Myanmar crisis. In my opinion, ASEAN should just accept the current military government in Myanmar and proceed with humanitarian efforts and so on, instead of interfering with Myanmar's internal issues.
    70
  578.  @LawasSarawak  Many Filipinos tend to have "colonial mentality". Not only were Philippines' lands colonized, but also the minds of its people were colonized. Even after the colonizer left, the people's minds remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. It's like Stockholm Syndrome.
    70
  579. Although Taiwan is at the cutting edge of making chips unbelievably small, humans are approaching the physical limit of how small we can manufacture chips, leading to the breakdown of Moore's Law. Some experts believe that the time of silicon chips is at an end, and that carbon chips (made of graphene) are the next step. If we reach the limit of silicon chips and carbon chips become viable, would this spell the end of Taiwan's silicon wafer fabrication?
    69
  580. China isn't interested in exporting our political system, unlike what the U.S is doing with democracy. China's model is not necessarily suitable for other countries to adopt, but China's model is successful for China, so other developing countries are welcome to pick up elements of China's model and apply it to their governments.
    69
  581. Contemporary Sino-African relations were established in the late 1950s, when China signed bilateral trade agreements with Algeria, Egypt, Guinea, Somalia, Morocco, and Sudan. Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai made a ten-country tour of Africa. Since then, China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries prior.
    69
  582. Humans are approaching the physical limit of just how small we can manufacture silicon-based chips, and Moore's law could be reaching its end (if it hasn't ended already). However, carbon-based chips shows promising results, being more efficient and requiring less power than silicon-based chips. If China's investment in carbon-based chips matures, it could potentially allow China to leap frog TMSC in chip production.
    69
  583.  @lakshmineuroscience  Tibet became part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China, and added those territories to Yuan Dynasty China. Today, Tibet is part of the People's Republic of China, so if India recognize Tibet's borders, then it should accept that Arunchal Pradesh is part of Tibet (hence part of PRC).
    69
  584.  @rpg1663  Less money but it depends on how you spent it. The cost of living in China is (generally) lower than that of the United States. In general, food is cheaper in China than in U.S. Rent is cheaper in China, so is gas and electricity. Transportation fares are lower, and there are options like rental bicycles, not to mention the high speed railway with its affordable train fares. In the U.S, the Americans have money but have to spend more.
    69
  585. Taiwan was ruled by authoritarian single-party Kuomintang for nearly its entire life and had been under martial law for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Only in 2016 (2 years ago) did another political party DPP, finally took over KMT at the reins. Much of Taiwan's great progress occurred under the authoritarian KMT leadership, but after DPP took over, Taiwan's economy has been in a slump since then.
    68
  586. Even Elon Musk faced flak from the Americans when Tesla opened a dealership showroom in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region. Are the people in Xinjiang suddenly not allowed to buy electric cars?
    68
  587.  @SynchronicitySequence  The population of Uighurs in Xinjiang actually grew by 16% since 2010.
    68
  588. Trump's tariffs are like lifting a stone to aim at China, only to drop the stone on his own foot.
    68
  589. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely the US and its so-called "allies.")
    68
  590. The Petrol Dollar is history and time to welcome the Petrol Yuan and Petrol Ruble.
    68
  591. The Geneva Convention and UN law acknowledges the Palestinians' right to armed struggle against the occupying power.
    68
  592.  @mamacryright5740  China seeks win-win cooperation, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    68
  593. The West desperately needs an off-ramp in Ukraine, but all they seem to have is an escalator.
    68
  594. The US Congress was exhibiting the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and Yellow Peril (phobia of being overrun by Asians) during the hearing.
    68
  595. China has 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, to chart China's course towards the future. By abolishing the term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. Whereas in the US, their presidents have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only make short-term plans for America, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more.
    68
  596. Singapore is the only ASEAN country to have slapped sanctons on Russia, earning Singapore a place on Russia's list of "unfriendly countries".
    68
  597.  @Curry.59  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago back when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty. The Manchu conquerors did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during the Qing Dynasty. Tibet broke free of China in 1912 but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951.
    68
  598. I'm sure that if you show these two hosts a Map of China, they'll can't even point out Xinjiang province, nor Shenzhen city on the map.
    68
  599. Not many cities have the suitable climate to host both the Summer Olympics and Winter Olympics. That's why Beijing has made history as being the first city to have the honor of hosting both types of Olympics, in 2008 and in 2022.
    67
  600. Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors. However, many Westerners (but not all) tend to regard Chinese in their lands as unwelcome.
    67
  601. Many Chinese welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors. However, many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands as unwelcome.
    67
  602.  @TheEVEInspiration  "Don't be so naïve, Chinese politics and law work quite different from Western counterparts." Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself? Have you actually worked with Chinese?
    67
  603. Others Westerners like Jeffrey Sachs and Martin Jacques also understand China thoroughly and their voices deserve to be heard.
    67
  604. Mainland China is arguably the only one in the world who truly cares about Taiwan (the U.S certainly doesn't). Many mainland Chinese have been taught since young to regard the people of Taiwan (also Hong Kong and Macau) as part of the same extended family. It's a pity that these feelings aren't always reciprocated by the people of Taiwan towards mainlanders.
    67
  605. Precisely. The same applies to smartphones. China has many smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Oppo, Vivo, etc, whereas the United States essentially only has one; Apple. The competition from smaller American firms in the industry have long been eliminated or bought over by the big monopolies.
    67
  606. There are so many dialects in China, that sometimes, within a specific area there are dialects within dialects.
    67
  607. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, rather than the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US's).
    66
  608.  @Madame702  On 10 March, Iran and Saudi Arabia signed an agreement, brokered by China, declaring their intention to end conflict. How is this not peace? And because I'm Chinese, you're calling me naive?
    66
  609. The Kubuqi Desert solar power plant is so advanced can even produce power at night. The key lies in that the solar park uses mirrors instead of solar panels. The mirrors rotate to focus the sun's rays onto the top of a tower to heat up molten salt. Molten salt is used because it can absorb and retain heat energy for a long time. Even at night the molten salt is still able to produce electricity without the sun.
    66
  610. In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, whereas in USA, the U.S corporations control the U.S government for profit.
    66
  611. A bully can be overcome if those bullied rally together against him.
    66
  612.  @containedhurricane  The Cold War era is bipolar world in which either you were one side or you were the other. A multipolar world has multiple nodes in which countries can gravitate towards others with similar interests and therefore lends itself to a certain level of stability.
    66
  613. The people of Taiwan need to vote for the Kuomintang next year instead of the DPP in order for cross strait relations to improve.
    65
  614. China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    65
  615. Only the next Taiwan election (in 2024) will tell.
    65
  616. “In the age of AI, where data is the new oil, China is the new Saudi Arabia!" - Lee Kai-fu, Venture Capitalist.
    65
  617.  @rap3208  But if the people in Gaza evacuate and leave their homes, then Israel could simply move in and take over their land (like they did for almost all of Palestine).
    65
  618. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    65
  619. Yes. According to Western organizations like Human Right's Watch, Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. Yet Singapore transformed from a sleepy fishing village nation into a world class country today under the single-party PAP government.
    65
  620. United States has 300 million consumers, but if China can transform our 1.4 billion people into consumers ourselves, then China would be the world's largest market (if we aren't already).
    65
  621. Overland trade by cargo trains may offer an alternative to maritime trade if the conflict intensifies in the Red Sea. That's one of the reasons why China is investing in the Belt and Road Initiative, in case maritime trade gets blocked.
    65
  622. China's adult literacy rate is 99%. USA's adult literacy rate is 79%.
    65
  623.  @alexng7583  "神州 Shenzhou for what I need to jealous??nonsense." I've read your previous comments, and they are dripping with sarcasm and venom, how did you not notice them? You seem to want to weaken the bond between China and Pakistan with your words is all.
    65
  624.  @HermanWillems  Chinese civilization today has remained relatively unchanged for the past thousands of years. For example, China has always been under a strong centralized government, be it under previous Emperors and the Imperial Court in the past, or under communist party rule today. Even Chinese characters constitute the oldest continuously used writing system in the world, whereas Egypt today no longer uses the Egyptian Hieroglyphs.
    65
  625. Many Chinese hold optimistic attitudes today, and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    65
  626. China seeks win-win cooperation, while the US only sees a zero sum game.
    65
  627.  @chrishannis1  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    64
  628. Agreed. U.S bases stationed in places like Okinawa also face rejection by the locals, but Japan is powerless to do anything about it.
    64
  629. Taiwan should learn lessons from Ukraine on what happens when US promises support "till the end." Ukraine was once the center of world attention until Oct 7 happened and now, Ukraine has been largely abandoned by the media.
    64
  630. The unipolar world is dying and the multipolar world is being born. Every birth is often accompanied by labor pains of some sort.
    64
  631. Just like Anthony Blinken, Jake Sullivan and John Kirby.
    64
  632.  @messire9837  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    64
  633. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, from the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and its "allies").
    63
  634. During Vietnam War, Americans dropped napalm bombs (remember 'Napalm Girl' photo? Who had her clothes burnt off and was running naked in the streets?) and torched Vietnamese villages to the ground. The Americans sprayed chemical defoliants like Agent Orange which cause birth deformities in Vietnamese children even 40 years after.
    63
  635. Decoupling from China is virtually impossible, given that China is home to 80-90% of the world's rare earth metal production. Rare earth metals are components in many familiar technologies, including smartphones, LED lights, and hybrid cars and various advanced technologies.
    63
  636. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. Whereas many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    63
  637. Meanwhile, Russia makes hypersonic shovels with chips taken from washing machines.
    63
  638. Many Chinese hold optimistic attitudes and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    63
  639. A wise man knows how little he knows, whereas fools think they know everything.
    63
  640.  @averysim7709  Exactly. After the USSR collapse in 1990s, Nato no longer served any interests (except the US hegemonic interests) and should have been disbanded long ago.
    63
  641. The White Australia policy is a term encapsulating a set of historical policies that aimed to forbid people of non-European ethnic origin, especially Asians (primarily Chinese) and Pacific Islanders, from immigrating to Australia, starting in 1901. ... Source: Wikipedia: White Australia policy Even though subsequent governments progressively dismantled such policies between 1949 and 1973, the mindset is still difficult to change.
    62
  642.  @TalesOfGod  China is world's leader in infrastructure development and we built the world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail. Our high-speed trains are world class, very efficient and the journeys very smooth. You can even balance small objects like coins, stationery, mobile phones and inverted water bottles near the window of a train moving at 350 kph and the objects won't be disturbed for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE
    62
  643.  @MarkYeung1  China did not impose trade sanctions on Australian coal and wine and lobster, those Australian products are still available in China, so what are you talking about?
    62
  644.  @aribethdetylmarande8228  said "Since China had never been ruled by other party, how do you know that China cannot gain similar economic achievement under leadership of a different government?" Prior to CCP coming to power, the mainland was known as Republic of China from 1912-1949 under Kuomintang administration. During this chaotic period, China lost control of Tibet, and was divided into various provinces, ruled by individual warlords all jostling for power, and even the Japanese invaded China during this turbulent period of China's history. In the end, the KMT failed to unify China and had to flee the mainland to Formosa (Taiwan). Whereas Mao Zedong succeed in unifying China under communism (where the previous KMT administration failed even after 37 years!) and he proclaimed the People's Republic of China in 1949, and Tibet was returned to Chinese control in 1951. So why can't I give credit to the CCP for what they done for China?
    62
  645. Mental colonization continues to persist in the minds of many Filipinos. It's because Philippines became an American colony after losing the American-Philippine war, and even after gaining independence, the minds of many of its people remain enslaved and loyal to their former colonial masters.
    62
  646. Israel's so-called "right to self-defense" is forfeited while it's on occupied territory. Meanwhile, the Geneva Convention acknowledges Palestine's right to armed struggle against the occupying forces.
    62
  647. The world's largest open-air concentration camp just got morphed into a death camp.
    62
  648. Meanwhile, the United States is sending military aid to Israel.
    62
  649. Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out is based on "perceived" US support. But as the US declines to the point where they can no longer challenge mainland China's rise, their support for Taiwan will eventually evaporate and reunification will be inevitable.
    62
  650.  @Elfan97-ec1uk  Taiwan draws its perceived strength from thinking that the US will come to its rescue. But as long as peace prevails, USA's decline will reach the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise, by which the support for Taiwan will evaporate leaving reunification as the only option.
    62
  651. USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    62
  652. From what I understand, wafer fabrication requires an abundance of water, so the U.S transferring Taiwan's TMSC technology to a state like Arizona, doesn't seem to be a good idea.
    61
  653. I think Italy should do what's in its own best interest. The US ability to apply pressure on others is gradually declining, and there will come a time when they are no longer able to challenge China's rise, by which then the pressure will evaporate and Italy may choose to rejoin the Belt and Road Initiative one day in the future.
    61
  654. The origins of many countries disputes today can actually be traced back to the British. Take the border dispute between India and China for example, it's because India insists on the McMahon Line drawn by British cartographer, Henry McMahon, without regard for pre-existing historical boundaries.
    61
  655. Russia is playing Chess. USA is playing Checkers. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋). Different games, different rules.
    61
  656. Many expats in China have found that on returning back to their home countries, it feels as though they have travelled back in time as many parts of China has embraced technology that's more advanced than their home countries.
    61
  657.  @calinyx  "In China the government hides it all so no one knows," Have you actually been to China and seen what life is really like here for yourself?
    60
  658. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    60
  659. The US could have chosen a path of cooperation instead of confrontation.
    60
  660.  @Kllllllvvvvvvf13  China sent those Uighur militants to re-education centers where they learned vocational skills and graduated as productive members of society. Isn't this a better path than the one that the IDF is embarking on?
    60
  661. Israel too.
    60
  662. The United States likes to claim "humanitarian efforts" in cleaning up un-exploded ordinance, but they were the ones who put those bombs there in the first place, this this is merely cleaning up their mess. They still haven't done so with Vietnam either, back when they sprayed chemical defoliants like Agent Orange causing birth defects in Vietnam children even till today.
    60
  663. Agreed. Why should the U.S be a so-called "mediator" and intervene in disputes in Asia? In my opinion, disputes in Asia should be for Asians to resolve ourselves.
    60
  664. In China, you can't change the government, but you can change the policies. In USA, you can change the government, but not the policies.
    60
  665.  @ngheanchoong  Even Apple iPhone manufacturer Foxconn has pulled out of a $19.5 billion joint venture with India's Vedanta company.
    60
  666. We must first safeguard our passwords, if we are to safeguard our economy and population crisis.
    60
  667.  @alexng7583  Isn't chrome/silver plated iron already stainless steel? From your condescending comments, why are you perhaps jealous of this strong bond?
    60
  668.  @RockyRover999  Chinese electric carmaker BYD offers a 6-year/150,000km warranty package for their vehicles. What "one week warranty" are you talking about?
    60
  669. +Waveland44 I would have to agree with you. Mention Germany's role during WW2, and most people will talk about Hitler, Nazi party, the Holocaust, etc. But mention Japanese role during WW2, and most people aren't entirely sure, saying things like "What's the name of that Chinese city massacre?" or "What's the name of the Japanese Emperor?" or "What's so bad about Unit 731?". Its because the knowledge of Japanese role has been covered up by the Americans, who help covered for Japanese's Unit 731 atrocities, and also decided to let Emperor Hirohito keep his position after WW2.
    60
  670.  user-ol3ru2kf1c  Canada 🇨🇦 remembers the Sikh Leader and is demanding answers out of India.
    60
  671. President Xi Jinping leads by example, by dressing up in military fatigues and actually joining the PLA soldiers at sea during this naval exercise.
    60
  672. Wu Wei (无为) the ancient Chinese concept of "doing nothing."
    59
  673. Hong Kong was once prosperous port city and global financial hub, but the Hong Kong protestors and rioters resorted to violence, arsonism, vandalism, hurling petrol bombs, breaking building windows, spooking away investors and scaring tourists, resulting in economic blow. Then Covid-19 happened and it's a double whammy for Hong Kong.
    59
  674. Mainland China will not go to war over Taiwan, unless Taiwan formally declares independence. Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out stems from perceived U.S support. However, it's no secret that U.S is in decline and China is rising. China is patient and once U.S declines to the point that the U.S can no longer afford to challenge mainland China's rise, then Taiwan's backing will evaporate and reunification will be the only option.
    59
  675.  @nuggetella  The 14th Dalai Lama was a "false God" indeed. He was just a man who accepted American money. We know this from declassified files which revealed that a total of $1,735,000 (equivalent to $17,044,700 in 2023) was allocated for separatist activities in Tibet.
    59
  676. Zelenskyy: "You promised to support Ukraine until the end!" Biden: "Well, this IS the end."
    59
  677.  @BrianOblivionB  Those "small wars" have cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of people in the Middle East. And it's a mistake to think that Russia and China are somehow interested in hegemony. Russia is concerned with security at its border, just like China. At the most, Russia and China will be region powers, but neither of them are interested in global hegemony.
    59
  678. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋) thinking 10 moves ahead.
    59
  679. Many Chinese welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors. However, many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands as unwelcome.
    58
  680. Sounds like the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West.
    58
  681. 我们将继续努力，为中国创造更美好的未来。🇨🇳 We will continue our efforts to build a better future for China. 🇨🇳
    58
  682. 看来他们不懂英文语法，还是故意翻译错。
    58
  683.  @georgekelmeris9804  China is more of a "People's democratic dictatorship" where the government ultimately has to bow down to the demands of the proletariat, (i.e working people), whereas in the United States for example, it's becoming a "dictatorship of the bourgeoisie", where the government bows down to the demands of rich people.
    58
  684. Fun Fact: The amount of concrete used by the USA in the whole 20th century is what China used in 3 years.
    58
  685. China used a proverb to summarized its stance. "Let he who tied the bell on the tiger, be the one to take it off" (解铃还须系铃人)
    58
  686. The West should be looking for an off-ramp in Ukraine, not continuing up the escalator in the wrong direction.
    58
  687. While China seeks win-win cooperation, the US only sees a zero sum game instead.
    58
  688. Taiwan's ability to hold out stems from (perceived) US support. But it's no secret that the US is in decline and mainland China is rising. As long as peace prevails, eventually they will decline to the point where they are unable to challenge China's rise, which by then the support for Taiwan will evaporate, and reunification will be the only outcome.
    58
  689.  Anonymous Panacea  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. All verified eyewitness accounts say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    58
  690. Many Chinese warmly welcome foreigners to our lands as visitors. Whereas many Westerners are increasing regarding Chinese in their lands as unwelcome.
    57
  691.  @marysylvie2012  You said: "Annd BTW we cannot possibly know what China wants, except demolish us." First you said you cannot possibly know what China wants, then you claim China wants to demolish you?
    57
  692.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "We all know about the history of conflicts between India and Pakistan." Many Indians (but not all) suffer from the "colonial mentality" of worshiping Anglo-Saxon culture at the expense to even their own culture. In 1947, the British partitioned British India into two, forming a separate sovereign country Pakistan. India later supported Bangladesh independence from East Pakistan, forming another separate sovereign country. Each division weakens the country, and once separated, the new countries might grow to become a thorn in your side. That's why China fight so hard to hold on to our territories like Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Taiwan. China doesn't want to end up like India and Pakistan; blood brothers that share the same history, but because of British partition, result in conflict and bloodshed.
    57
  693. Imran Khan is well-loved among Pakistani, it's a pity that he was removed from power.
    57
  694. Meng Wanzhou has been kidnapped since December 2018, and it's already 2021 and still her case isn't settled? The whole world changed after Covid-19 during Meng's detention, it's high time to bring her home to be with her family.
    57
  695. China is both a 5,000 year old civilization state as well as a modern space-faring nation.
    57
  696.  Karen Xitler  Chairman Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. Yet he's being recorded as a mass murderer in the West, when the intent to murder isn't there?
    57
  697. Yes indeed. As a consequence, Singapore has been added to Russia's list of unfriendly countries.
    57
  698.  @relaxwhc  Chairman Mao has been misunderstood in the West, and also among the overseas Chinese community. Both you and I are aware of Western MSM demonising China currently, but when it comes to historical events (like the Western demonisation of communism during the Cold War) you just believe what Western propaganda says about Mao Zedong?
    57
  699. China's adult literacy rate reached 99.83 percent in 2021. US adult literacy rate was 79 percent in 2022.
    57
  700. George Yeo himself was asked if Singapore would want to join this Chinese commonwealth (given the prevalence of Chinese culture in Singapore) to which he replied "never the political sense." Turns out that he himself can't accept applying this commonwealth idea to his own country, so it's unlikely that mainland China and Taiwan island will either.
    57
  701. If Cyrus acknowledges that Israel has a "right to self-defense" then shouldn't he also acknowledge Palestine's right to armed struggle against the occupying power? After all, armed resistance against the occupying power is a fact that is acknowledged by international humanitarian law conventions.
    57
  702. It's the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overwhelming the West) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today.
    56
  703. Prof Kishore Mahbubani also said: "Throughout human history, China and India were economic powers from 1-1800 AD, and the past 200 years of human history have been a aberration. All aberrations come to an end someday."
    56
  704.  @blockraven22  China had help Vietnam fight for independence from France. During the First Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons, ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. On top of this, China sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help Vietnam fight for independence from France.
    56
  705. Researchers from China and the US have also jointly developed a new type of stable semiconductor graphene, which displays performance 10 times higher than silicon. As silicon-based chips become smaller in size, scientists are gradually approaching the physical limit of two nanometers, by which Moore's Law would no longer apply. Carbon-based chips made from graphene show potential as an alternative to silicon-based chips.
    56
  706.  @jeffros6739  Views can change. As Cyrus said, many Chinese used to have a positive view of the United States, but some Chinese international students returning from the US have changed their views about the US.
    56
  707.  @ABCXYZ-jk8me  Confucius is one of history's most influential philosophers. His insights have shaped the cultures of East Asia and beyond for centuries.
    56
  708. China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia have since succumbed to history. China has witness the rise and fall of numerous other nations and yet China has survived to the modern era relatively intact.
    56
  709. "Repay virtue with virtue, and evil with justice. (以德报德，以直报怨)", said by Confucius
    56
  710. Dismantle the Military Industrial Complex!
    56
  711. +Haruka ino During the Dalai Lama administration of Tibet, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites (slave owners). Tibetan mountainous soil was poor, and the people were surrounded by mountains, so the slaves worked all day to grow food to feed the population and support the 5% elites. Starvation was commonplace, punishments were harsh, people had limbs amputated for crimes or even their skins removed. There is this Tibetan drum called damaru that is made from human skulls, human skin as the drumskin, and human bone as the drumstick. The Dalai Lama was worshiped and people fought for the right to consume his body fluids like saliva, urine and even his feces, because he was seen as a holy vessel by the people. But after the government regained control of Tibet in 1951, it began to modernize under the government. Roads, houses, streetlamps, schools, universities, hospitals, etc were built, and homes now had running water, plumbing, gas and electricity installed. Modern technology, like cars, smartphones, computers, the Internet, WiFi, and mobile phone coverage were available, even in such remote place like Himalayas. Chinese built the Qinghai Railway (world's highest altitude railway) through difficult mountain terrain and low oxygen conditions, and connecting Tibet to the rest of the world. Now food can be imported from the mainland to feed Tibetans and their population has increased because of that. A tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet, allowing pilgrims much easier access to the otherwise isolated state in the Himalayas.
    56
  712.  @macrosense  Mainland China recognizing Taiwan's independence would be a political victory for the US, not China. Once they are independent, they become fare more susceptible to foreign influence and may become a thorn in the side.
    56
  713. I hope that Eileen Gu not only inspires more Chinese athletes to take up winter sports here in China, but to also inspire oversea Chinese and people of Chinese descent to be proud of their motherland.
    55
  714. Meanwhile, US President Trump defends Saudi Arabian Crown Prince from his involvement of murder of journalist.
    55
  715. Some people in Hong Kong (but not all) are still suffering from the "colonial mentality" imposed by colonizers on the minds of the colonized. Even though Britain has physically decolonized from Hong Kong, the "decolonization of the mind" still needs to happen in Hong Kong.
    55
  716. Totally agree. A country can call itself democratic or not, the most important thing is whether the government can deliver what the people themselves want.
    55
  717. He has been declared persona non grata by Israel just for speaking the truth.
    55
  718. Here's the Chinese way to explain the Ukraine/Russia war to help clear up the confusion through a story: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (i.e NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was enraptured with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband and dreams of marrying into the NATO family, and of milking her ex-husband dry of his assets. The village chief didn't want to marry Ukraine into the family. She was high-maintenance and loved to splurge money. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) went crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex husband and wife conflict, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would have to join the fight against the ex-husband.
    55
  719. If "Israel have right to defend itself" then Palestine has the right to armed struggle against the occupying power. Armed resistance against the occupying power is a fact that is acknowledged by international humanitarian law conventions.
    55
  720. China even became the first country in the world to land on the far side of the Moon.
    55
  721. Only way to achieve that is to get rid of the Military Industrial Complex.
    55
  722. Americans themselves put up their own lands for sale, so can't Chinese buyers purchase what's for sale?
    55
  723. China stands in solidarity with Iran over the bombing of their embassy. In 1999, the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade was similarly bombed.
    54
  724. Many European countries continue to buy Russian gas in rubles, despite exerting pressure on other countries like India and China not to buy from Russia.
    54
  725. Here's a Chinese joke: The name Facebook in Mandarin sounds like Fēisǐ bùkě (非死不可) in Mandarin, which translates to "Must Die"
    54
  726. Chinese have been building "towns" located near major cities all over the world, where people can come to appreciate Chinese culture and sample delicious Chinese cuisine. These Chinese ethnic enclaves are more commonly known as "Chinatowns"
    54
  727. When ancient China invented the paper banknote, other countries soon followed and adopted paper currencies. Now China that is rolling out CBDC, other countries will also follow in the future.
    54
  728.  @dotterdam6047  How has Russia been weakened? Through falling unemployment rates in Russia and purchasing German cars through Kazakhstan?
    54
  729. China has hatched 5-year plan, 10-year plan, 20-year plan, 30-year plan to chart the course of China's future. Our leaders are able to remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. Whereas in the US, their leaders have to step down after 4-8 years so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long-term plans spanning 10 years or more.
    54
  730. But the Western media would have you believe that the government somehow controls all 1.4 billion Chinese people's thoughts, when in truth, every Chinese each have their own personal beliefs that's all.
    53
  731. The Chinese government has consistently emphasised its respect for German industry, lauded Germany’s willingness to invest in China, and praised German openness to business and political prudence when dealing with the Chinese leadership. Germany stands to gain from doing more business with China, rather than less business.
    53
  732. NASA: "Ladies and gentlemen, may we present the International Space Station!" NASA: "BTW, China you can't come!" * China builds our own space station *
    53
  733. Mind your business America, focus on solving your internal problems rather worrying about China. We are handling our own problems.
    53
  734. Perhaps America should first put their house in order before planning their foreign policy. As the saying goes: "Foreign policy begins at home."
    53
  735. Russia and China are facilitating the global transition towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, rather than the uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US and its "allies").
    53
  736. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US and its "allies.")
    53
  737.  @HermanWillems  Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he certainly did not hate all 5,000 years of China's history. At the most, he hated that China suffered greatly during the Century of Humiliation) and Mao wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign influence. It was Mao who succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country, where the previous Kuomintang government failed to do for 37 years under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949)
    53
  738.  @lorellaldos5263  Agreed. Victoria Nuland is also afraid that these bio research facilities will "fall under Russian hands," but if those bio labs in Ukraine were for peaceful purposes, then my question is why would they be afraid of the data falling into Russia's hands?
    53
  739.  @4x4r974  Tibet has already been freed from the 14th Dalai Lama who've accepted American money to carry out separatist activities.
    53
  740.  @elanor2123  About the Tibetan monks protesting do you actually have evidence that they got the same fate as Falungong practitioners? In the Chinese city you lived in before, it's sad that Tibetan monks been taught to sacrifice themselves by dousing themselves with oil, lit on fire and committed suicide, isn't it almost like a terrorist blowing himself up and dying for a terrorist cause? The additional fire extinguishers were there to hopefully help put out the Tibetan protestors fire and possibly save their lives, instead of them getting disfigured or dying because of religion.
    52
  741. The people of Taiwan do not realize that USA doesn't truly support ROC. USA did nothing to punish Russia's annexation of Crimea from Ukraine, except impose sanctions that's all, so what makes ROC believe USA would be willing to go to war with China for Taiwan's sake? They are being led to believe that USA will come to their aid, when there is no actual guarantee. Chinese government has proposed extending the One-China Two-Systems policy shared with Hong Kong and Macau to encompass Taiwan as well, but ROC rejected this offer and has not offered counterproposal of its own. As far as I know, ROC still claims all of mainland China as belonging to them, including Xinjiang, Tibet, whole of Mongolia and parts of Russia, Burma, Bhutan, India, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Taijikstan, etc. according to following source: Republic of China Administrative claims en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg
    52
  742. China sees win-win whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    52
  743. What they desperately need right now is to look for an off-ramp in Ukraine, yet all they have is an escalator and they are going in the wrong direction.
    52
  744. Here's a Chinese analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    52
  745. It's a zero sum game for the U.S, whereas in China, it's all about win-win cooperation.
    52
  746.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  So why don't you go bother @mansana then, since you ostensibly know so much about him? I mere reposted a translation of the Ukraine crisis that was taken off Weibo, in the hopes of helping people understand the conflict on a more relatable level.
    52
  747. Taiwan used to be one of Four Asian Tigers but since democracy was introduced to Taiwan, it's economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving for jobs in the mainland or Singapore "From the '90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreements on policy matters. This produced less effective policy making. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be more conservative in Taiwan, so they do not enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou, Research Fellow, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica ... Source: YouTube: How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents | Insight | CNA Insider
    51
  748. Russia is playing 3D chess. Ukraine is playing 2D chess. USA is playing 1D chess with no reverse gear.
    51
  749. Israel dropped more than 25,000 tons of ordnance on Gaza since Oct 7, which is the equivalent of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
    51
  750. China has 5000 years of history and culture and is among the world's oldest 'continous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have long since faded to history. The government has literally thousands of years of political literature from the past to draw upon and help guide us towards success.
    51
  751.  @americanpatriot126  China actually preserved the native culture far better than Americans ever did for the Native Americans.
    51
  752. Indeed. I've lost count of how many times I heard Americans/Westerners say that. The Chinese government actually transformed China from a previously poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy (1st if you go by PPP), the world's factory, having world's 2nd largest R&D spending, and protected by a rapidly modernizing military.
    51
  753.  @julion89  In China, the government maintains control over religion and not the other way round. The government is the highest authority and is above religion. If certain religious beliefs or practices prove to be harmful to society, then the government has authority to overrule them.
    51
  754. The big American oil companies won't allow EV infrastructure to overtake gasoline car infrastructure.
    51
  755. China's stance can be summarized in a proverb: "Let he who tied the bell on the tiger, be the one to take it off" (解铃还须系铃人)
    51
  756. Joe Burns Zheng He's voyagers helped put China on the radar with our regional neighbours. It's part of the reason why there are so many people of Chinese ancestry in Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines, etc.
    51
  757. Russia withdrawing its troops won't end the conflict, it would be the Minsk Accords all over again, with the Nato simply buying more time to rearm Ukraine.
    51
  758. Even the World Economic Forum did a survey to answer the question: Which countries are on the right track, according to their citizens? and around 90% of Chinese surveyed believe that China is heading in the right direction. China: 10% (Wrong track), 90% (Right direction) Saudi Arabia: 20% (Wrong track), 80% (Right direction) India: 24% (Wrong track), 76% (Right direction) ... Australia: 55% (Wrong track), 45% (Right direction) Great Britain: 63% (Wrong track), 37% (Right direction) United States: 65% (Wrong track), 35% (Right direction) ... Source: World Economic Forum
    51
  759. The US is much accustomed to strangling the economies of other countries, now they are finally getting a taste of their own medicine through having their own economy strangled in the Red Sea.
    51
  760.  @chrishamlin5863  Take the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) for example, and CPEC has created 192,000 jobs for local Pakistani workers.
    51
  761. The Americans literally made use of Chinese inventions like the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) of paper, printing, compass and gunpowder.
    51
  762. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, rather than the unipolar world,dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US and its "allies").
    51
  763. The world has become a chessboard. Russia is playing Chess. USA is playing Checkers. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋).
    50
  764. Well said. In fact, Putin's withdrawal of Russian forces from Kiev was actually a gesture of goodwill in order to create favorable conditions for peace talks in Istanbul. But the gesture has been framed as a "bad performance by Russia" in the West.
    50
  765. It's almost cartoonish. Like watching a train travelling full-speed ahead towards a cliff.
    50
  766.  @Gobsmacked52  The Russia of today is no longer the Soviet Union of the past, and Russia has found a system that works for their country, then why should they abandon such a system? I mean, look at polls and surveys, and Russian President Putin and Chinese President Xi enjoy high approvals, whereas the approvals of leaders of Western democracies are at a all time low.
    50
  767.  @bigglesharrumpher4139  Take for example the China-Laos Railway, a collaboration effort which upon its launch, has transported a million passengers and half a million tonnes of cargo since.
    50
  768. It's the "perpetual foreigner" stereotype, where even though and an Asian American is born, grew up and raised in America, he/she is still treated as an outsider and therefore legally unassimilable, therefore it is permissible in their minds to tell them "Go back to China". Sadly, some Asian Americans spent their entire lives worshiping white culture, and pretending to be white, only to still face the same rejection from other Americans.
    50
  769. It's the combination of the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (phobia of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today.
    50
  770.  @ADHD-Esoteric  It's like many Americans aren't willing to listen to any view that portrays China in a remotely positive light.
    50
  771. I agree. This is like Western feminists trying to push their agenda onto Chinese women.
    49
  772. The problem is the mindset. Many Indians (but not all) tend to have the "colonial mentality" of worshipping AngloSaxon culture and language, while harboring a disdain for non-Anglo cultures (including their own). Even after the British left India, the minds of some of its people remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters.
    49
  773. If the DPP want's to breakaway from mainland China, then they should get out of the Chinese territory of Taiwan, and find their own plot of land elsewhere to claim for themselves.
    49
  774. China and Russia are facilitating the global transition towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, rather than the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and its "allies").
    49
  775. The Communist Party of China isn't perfect, but they have done an excellent job transforming China from the once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the CPC, despite Western MSM constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    49
  776.  @MikeJones69696  Previously before the handover, Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy, and the people of Hong Kong did not hold elections for 150 years as a British colony. Only during the period of the 1997 handover, did Hong Kong people finally get to vote for their favorite leaders under the One Country, Two Systems policy.
    49
  777. The West should be looking for an off-ramp in Ukraine, not continuing up the escalator.
    49
  778. Rule No. 1: Don't March on Moscow. Rule No. 2: Don't Bluff Beijing. Rule No. 3: Don't Test Tehran. (Looks like we're witnessing what happens when Rule No.3 is broken)
    49
  779.  @maddog3768  "china takes over their country ??. We saw that recently to Sri Lanka." Did China take over Sri Lanka? What are you talking about? Sri Lanka is currently still their own country and not a Chinese "colony".
    49
  780.  @ColoniaMurder20  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China, and then incorporated both those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. And Xinjiang was part of China since before Jesus Christ himself was born, and it was known as Xiyu (西域) during Han Dynasty (200 BC).
    49
  781. It's impossible to talk about the rise of Asia without mentioning China's rise. Yet Bhutan has no official relations with China, and hardly any trade with China. Land-connectivity is enhanced by China's Belt and Road Initiative, yet Bhutan is not a part of BRI. So how exactly is Bhutan qualified to lead the rise of Asia, when it refuses to ride the wave?
    49
  782.  @buymecola1  Some of those overseas Chinese diaspora were born and bred in an environment that constantly portrays their motherland in a negative light. Growing up feeling a sense of shame towards their own motherland, all that's needed is for them to revisit their motherland and see what China is really like for themselves, not what's being told to them.
    48
  783. Canadian parliament welcoming that 98-year old Ukrainian who fought in WW2 against the Russians with a standing ovation is proof that Russia's special military operation is justified.
    48
  784. In March 2022, Russian forces withdrew from Kiev as a gesture of goodwill in order to facilitate peace talks. Talks that were later torpedoed by Boris Johnson.
    48
  785. Sadly, there are some Chinese out there who feel ashamed of their motherland. Growing up in the West under their media has kept them in the dark of China's achievements.
    48
  786. Some Indians believe that population is everything, and that China owes its success to its huge population and therefore, India can expect the same success given its population. But more importantly is ensuring that children born receive adequate food, healthcare, and enrollment into schools to unlock their potential. India may have a huge population, but also high child malnutrition, high infant mortality, and high illiteracy rate.
    48
  787.  @robinmiller871  Prison labor literally contributes to the U.S economy.
    48
  788. The transition to a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices from the uni-polar world dominated by one voice (that of the U.S and its allies) would not be complete without an alternative to the USD.
    48
  789. During the 19th century, Britain wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want what the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and force China at gun point to open our ports to opium, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to spread the addiction throughout rest of China, and Hong Kong was taken and made into British colony. Even after Britain renounced its rule over its former colonies, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China.
    48
  790. The former is in the US's diplomatic vocabulary, while the latter isn't. Just look at how Chinese and Russian diplomats like Wang Yi and Larov behave, compared to US diplomats like Blinken, Sullivan, Kirby, etc.
    48
  791.  @JetSetRadio2000  Well, with a friend like the United State, who needs enemies?
    48
  792.  @antoniohagopian213  Have you seen what Chinese EVs are capable of?
    48
  793. Many Chinese hold optimistic attitudes and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future, so they claim China is collapsing.
    48
  794.  @abyyy490  China has absolutely no intention of bringing war onto American soil. The same however, cannot be said of the US onto Chinese soil.
    48
  795.  @bradmettler4566  So much unnecessary suffering could have been avoided had Boris not appeared and torpedoed the deal.
    48
  796.  @bartolino980  Read about how Nato made promises not to expand eastward, but kept on doing so till Russia's doorstep.
    48
  797. Agreed. The CCP had smaller forces, so resorted to tactics suitable for a small force to engage a larger force, such as through guerrilla warfare and so on.
    48
  798. That bombing of Cathedral in southern Philippines by Islamic radicals. I heard the Muslims are also voting in a referendum on the proposed creation of an autonomous region in Philippines. Why Philippines allow Muslims to divide their country and create new region? Because of Islamic terrorists?
    47
  799. Once again, U.S special agent Ned has completed the undercover mission. Now the U.S can frame China as the culprit behind Sri Lanka's woes. But little do they know that agent Ned often leaves behind a trail of money pointing to himself.
    47
  800. Many Chinese warmly welcome foreigners to our land as visitors. It's a shame that many Westerners (but not all) are regarding foreigners in their lands as unwelcome.
    47
  801. China not only has a numerical advantage in STEM graduates, but in data as well. As Lee Kai-Fu said: "In this age of AI, data is the new oil, and China is the new Saudi Arabia of data."
    47
  802.  @blitz12399  Western leaders were discussing the supply of nuclear weapons to Ukraine before Russia's special military operation began a year ago. The West had already sent heavy military equipment, planes and defence systems to Ukraine before 2022.
    47
  803. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a bleak outlook of the future.
    47
  804. China is willing to learn from the West, but are Westerners willing to learn from China?
    47
  805. China told the United States that the one who tied the bell on the tiger, should be the one to take it off.
    47
  806. Zelensky is the best salesmen. Every time he comes to the USA, he walks away with $60 billion of taxpayers money.
    47
  807.  @johnsoltan965  That's Capitalism at work, which seeks to shrink the workers wages in order to maximise profits. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to one's needs. The Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, hospitals, schools, etc for everyone on the Earth, yet we still have starving people, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, and so on.
    47
  808. China to other countries: "Let's focus on attaining a win-win situation!" U.S to other countries: "It's a zero sum game. Are you with us or against us?"
    47
  809. I've been to Hong Kong before, but when I open my mouth and speak Mandarin, many local Hong Kongers treated me coldy. But when I open my mouth and speak English, many local Hong Kongers started treating me warmly.
    47
  810.  @dontjudge6379  Agreed. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners (not all) are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    47
  811. 老实说 翻墙之后 就觉得很多美国人被美媒洗脑了。
    47
  812. It all starts with de-humanizing them. Netanyahu even called the Palestinians by the term animal-human.
    47
  813. Back when China was dirt-poor, starving country, China accepted waste from other countries for a living. Now China is economic juggernaut and factory of the world, China don't need to rely on scraps from other countries anymore.
    47
  814. Chinese are no strangers to hard work, from blue-collar jobs such as laborer (coolies), rickshaw drivers, farmers, chefs (esp. Chinese restaurants), laudromat workers. As well as white-collar jobs such as doctors, lawyers, dentists, engineers, programmers, scientists and so on. There is no work that Chinese aren't qualified or unwilling to do.
    47
  815. United States: "We will not send officials to attend the 2022 Beijing Olympics!" Other 5 Eyes: "Same here, we will boycott the Olympics diplomatically!" United States: "Gotcha! Just kidding! We will be sending 18 officials to attend the Beijing Olympics!" Other 5 Eyes: "What? How are we going to explain our boycott to China? Why'd we follow the U.S in the first place?"
    46
  816.  @fortunatomartino9797  China had a massive navy as early as Ming Dynasty (14th century), yet China did not found colonies all over the world unlike the European colonial powers that came later.
    46
  817. Countries have to follow U.S political system if they want to participate in such summits. Whereas China doesn't care what political system your country follows as long as you're willing to do business with China.
    46
  818. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the U.S is a threat to global peace here.
    46
  819.  vlADOLF PUTLER  Taiwan is an inalienable part of China. Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments or formal declaration of independence, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    46
  820. Zelenskyy wanted to implement the Minsk Agreement, but the Ukrainian ultra-nationalist, neo-Nazi forces like the Azov Battalion would kill Zelenskyy if he made any move towards stopping the fighting in Donetsk and Lugansk. Zelenskyy is a Jew btw, so he fears for his life from the neo-Nazis and is powerless to stop the fighting in those two republics.
    46
  821. Xinjiang food is delicious. Chinese love kebab/skewers (串) which originated in Xinjiang and later spread to every food stall in China.
    46
  822. As the proverb goes: "If you wait by the river long enough, the bodies of your enemies will float by." They'll see you waiting on the opposite riverbank, get tired of waiting and then enter the river in an attempt to get to you, only to end up drowning themselves in the process.
    46
  823. Nepalese are our brothers! Gautama Buddha himself was born in Nepal and Buddhism eventually reached China and is recognized as one of five major religions here in China.
    46
  824. South East Asian should also be wary of external forces seeking to disrupt its growing relation with China. Especially from the West.
    46
  825. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. In contrast, many Westerners (but not all) tend to be pessimistic and have a bleak outlook of the future.
    46
  826. The US only sees a zero sum game.
    46
  827. NBC news reporter can pose questions to Putin during press conference in Russia. RT and Sputnik News can't do the same to Biden during press conference in USA. Which one is authoritarian?
    46
  828. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mentality that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many (but not all) to fathom.
    46
  829. Many of the older generation in Taiwan have memories of the mainland and are pro-reunification, but sadly, it's the new generation of Taiwan people that have grown distant from the mainland.
    46
  830. +Haruka ino Japan has the unfortunate distinction of being the only country in the world to have nuclear bombs dropped on its soil. Because of this, many Japanese people are against nuclear weapons and are throughly against Japan becoming a nuclear armed state.
    46
  831.  @everTriumph  Have you actually visited Russia and seen what life is like there for yourself? People who've been to Moscow have said the city is nothing like what's being portrayed in the media.
    46
  832. "If the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail." – Mark Twain
    46
  833.  @thespiderguy3515  You said: "they are investing in Telangana State with other company don't make people fool" Which company are they investing in? How much is the investment?
    46
  834. Dilraba Dilmurat 迪丽热巴 is one of the most popular Chinese actress of Uighur decent at the moment. She starred in popular Chinese dramas like Three Lives, Three Worlds, Ten Miles of Peach Blossoms 《三生三世十里桃花》
    46
  835. Safety to me means our children are protected from firearms, that young girls can stay out late at night without incident, and our elder folks are given the best possible protection from Covid-19. And of course, no bombings or drone strikes.
    46
  836. Fall of Saigon (1975) as US pulled out of South Vietnam. Fall of Kabul (2021) as US pulled out of Afghanistan. Fall of Kiev (????)
    46
  837.  @marysylvie2012  You can continue living in your dream instead of facing reality.
    46
  838.  @marysylvie2012  You've been to China before? When did you visit? China has transformed from an impoverished, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy today (in fact, the world's largest if measured by purchasing power parity) the world's factory, having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. The lives of Chinese have changed and while there are still issues, for the most part, many people in China tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead.
    46
  839. Russia's military used to be second strongest in the world, now it's the U.S military that's ranked second.
    45
  840.  @AQuietNight  The Made-in-China 2025 plan aims to further develop China's manufacturing sector, moving away from being a producer of low-tech goods into a more technology-intensive powerhouse.
    45
  841. +Haruka ino Who is the one fantasising about Nanjing here in the first place?
    45
  842. China's position towards human rights is that the right to subsistence is the most important of all human rights, and is focused on poverty alleviation efforts, whereas the American position on human rights is about weaponizing them to interfere in other country's affairs.
    45
  843. Ukrainian strategy is to fight to hold onto undefendable territory (i.e Severodonetsk) until the very end, at the expense of their soldiers' lives. Russian strategy is to wisely withdraw from undefendable positions in order to preserve troop strength.
    45
  844. It's true. Even the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) launched the world's first satellite, Sputnik, into orbit. The first man in space was Soviet Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin and the first space station was the Soviet Salyut station.
    45
  845.  @engr.ediyoakpanesen7260  Cyrus videos contain the peaceful message of Building Bridges, Not Walls between the US and China, so isn't this a positive message for the world? Or would you prefer the opposite message (one of war) instead?
    45
  846.  @hukebein92  YouTube won't let me mention Ukraine and Corrupt in the same sentence
    45
  847. As the world's most populous country, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4 times that of USA, China has at least 4 geniuses to every 1 American genius. And this can be proven statistically. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large Populations Have More Geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Taken from the above: Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    45
  848. People deserve the right to life and protection from Covid and governments should do more to help prevent unnecessary loss of life from Covid.
    45
  849. It's enriching to hear the explanations of Russian military tactics from the standpoint of someone of a previous military background like yourself. Much better than the Western MSM's explanation of Russia's military tactics as failures.
    45
  850.  @cryptonite2806  You said "Russia is historical agressor. It occupied more teritorry from other countries in its history than any other country." That's incorrect. Historically, it was the British Empire that occupied more territory from other countries in its history any other country in the world. Secondly, Russia is responding to aggressive NATO expanding eastwards toward Russia. Putin had wanted assurance that NATO would not allow Ukraine to join NATO. In fact, many NATO countries themselves are reluctant to admit Ukraine into NATO due to its corrupt government, but they refuse to put that down in writing to assuage Putin. So after years of having his words fall on deaf ears, Putin finally acted.
    45
  851. As Chinese myself, I personally found many Hollywood movies to be severely lacking in Asian actors. Asian actors (Chinese,Japanese, Koreans) are heavily underrepresented in Hollywood, often casted into cliche roles like martial artist, triad thug, nerdy but social inept guy, hacker, etc. Asian actresses often get roles as damsel in distress (to be saved by Caucasian male lead) or prostitutes, dragon ladies, massage parlor workers, other sexualized roles etc. Also, there's also "white-washing" of Asian characters, that is, the casting of Caucasian actor/actress to portray a character of Asian descent on film. Hopefully, China's influence on Hollywood can help grant more prominent roles to Asian actors/actresses.
    45
  852.  @Lu-MingPan-b5w  I'm sure there are many Americans that can at least speak Mandarin. Why not assign one of them to become the US ambassador to China, is the question I would like to ask.
    44
  853. Westerners use Chinese technology such as the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) of China. Paper and Printing have made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge much easier. The Compass has made navigation in poor weather conditions much easier. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But I've never heard of Chinese complaining about the West making use of Chinese inventions.
    44
  854. Before I went to sleep, my wife was complaining to me: "This Russia is such a bad country, if Ukraine wants to join NATO, it is their business and freedom, Russia has no right to intervene. This is just an excuse for Russia to invade Ukraine." I said nothing, got out of bed and went to the kitchen, before returning to bed with knife in my hand. I told my wife: "Let's go to sleep" Upon seeing the knife, my wife sat up abruptly and looked at me with wide eyes. "What are you doing? Sleeping with a knife?!" she exclaimed. I replied: "Don’t worry about it, let’s go to sleep. Besides, me sleeping with a knife is none of your business and it is my freedom." My wife said: "You're crazy! How can I sleep when you are lying next to me with a knife? What if you accidentally cut me?" I replied: “Well, you don’t even trust your own husband, how can you expect Russia to trust Ukraine? Sleeping with a knife is like Ukraine joining the NATO." .... An anonymous analogy taken off Weibo.
    44
  855. When the lie gets repeated long enough, the lie itself starts to think it Israel. (As in the "lie itself starts to think it IS REAL.")
    44
  856.  @jk5335  Just replace everything he says about "Russia collapsing" to "Ukraine collapsing" and it will be correct.
    44
  857.  @thelastenforcer  This puts those US ambassadors at a distinct disadvantage in diplomatic negotiations.
    44
  858. India is important to BRICS, because it happens to be the only vowel in the name.
    44
  859. Many anti-China people often told me that: "Chinese Culture is Destroyed" by the government but have they actually been to China and counted the number of UNESCO World Heritage sites in China? With the exception of Italy, China actually have more UNESCO World Heritage Sites than the rest of the world.
    44
  860. There's hardly any homeless in China because of the high homeownership (90%) in China. At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations.
    44
  861. According to Prof Zhang Weiwei, China's system combines both Eastern meritocracy with Western democracy, a process he termed: "Selection + Election". "Selection" comes from China's Imperial Exam systems and candidates take exams and get promoted based on their competence. "Election" is inherited from the West, and together, it means that candidates must not only obtain good grades, but they must also garner support for their policies from other communist members.
    44
  862. This Cambodian multilingualist (English, Espanol, Mandarin, etc) has been seemingly overlooked by the Western tourists (many don't really care about Cambodians) so it was up to Chinese to notice this boy's talents and sponsor his education.
    44
  863. Back then, the USA accuse mainland China of potentially abusing the Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now scrapped). Now the USA turn around and abuse their own extradition bill with Canada with Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou. The USA accuse others of doing things that they themselves done.
    43
  864. Sun Zi's strategy is "Know your opponent, know yourself."_ Trump's strategy is "My opponent can't know my plans, if I myself don't know what I'm doing!"
    43
  865.  @Ullr-el3pu  Decoupling from China at this point is virtually impossible. Also, Using Winnie the Pooh (a yellow bear with small eyes) to refer to a Chinese man, is borderline racist in itself.
    43
  866.  user-ol3ru2kf1c  Canada 🇨🇦 remembers the Sikh Leader and is demanding answers out of India.
    43
  867. Two parties that are more interested in fighting each other and sabotaging each other's plans, than actually solving America's woes.
    43
  868. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    43
  869. Many Filipinos (but not all) tend to have the "Colonial Mentality" of worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture, while harboring disdain for many "non-white" culture (including their own). Even though the Philippines has since decolonized, the mindsets of many of its people also need to undergo a type of mental decolonization as well.
    43
  870. China signed a No-First-Use policy regarding nuclear weapons, meaning that China will not preemptively launch a nuclear strike first, unless China is itself attacked with nukes. So if nuclear war is to be had, China won't be the one starting it.
    43
  871. ​ @zetristan4525  How am I adamant not to understand meaning? Take your words for example, you seem to think its okay to criticize the CPC, but can't I defend it then? China was previously a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and China has transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (largest by GDP PPP) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the CPC.
    43
  872.  @LoveWatchingNDEs  Do you agree that cutting off water, food and electricity to Gaza is a crime?
    43
  873. Agreed. Just look at how Anthony Blinken, John Kirby and Jake Sullivan talk about China. This behavior has spread throughout the whole administration.
    43
  874.  @smith2354  Agreed. Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2022, and China's economy is still going.
    43
  875. It's a combination of the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (phobia of the West being overrun with Asians) that's fueling Sinophobia in the West today.
    43
  876. Many Filipinos (but not all of them) tend to have the colonial mentality. Colonial mentality is the internalized perception of ethnic and cultural inferiority as a result of colonization. They have an ingrained preference for Anglo Saxon culture over any "non-white" culture, including their own.
    43
  877.  @havaianuu  China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia have since succumbed to history. Throughout its long history, China has witness the birth and death of various nations, the rise of fall of numerous empires, and yet China has survived the violent passage of time to arrive at the modern world relatively intact.
    43
  878. The U.S printing dollars backed by nothing is kinda like that cartoon where Wild E Coyote chases Road Runner off a cliff and continues "running on mid-air". It's only a matter of time before gravity finally "catches up with him," that's when the USD will fall.
    43
  879.  FREEHONGKONG-yn5ij  Free Julian Assange. Bring him home to his wife and kids.
    43
  880. We live in an age of Internet and information, yet sadly, ignorance is still widespread
    43
  881.  @swissclimber1  China’s infrastructure construction is arguably one of the best in the world. China is home to many of the world's longest bridges and tallest bridges after all.
    43
  882. Even if you hate Chinese people, that doesn't mean you should hate our language.
    42
  883. Chinese have a nickname for Trump, Chuan Jianguo (川建国) meaning "Trump the (Chinese) Nation Builder" The irony of the nation builder part is that Trump's policies are actually making China great again.
    42
  884. They fear revenge from those that they have bullied.
    42
  885. China has many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans. Our leaders are able to remain in power long-term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. Whereas the US President have to step down after 4-8 years so they can only make short-term plans instead of long-term plans spanning say 10 years or more for America's future.
    42
  886. During the Istanbul talk, Putin even withdrew Russian forces from Kiev as a gesture of goodwill in order to create favorable conditions for talks. Eventually though, the peace negotiations were torpedoed by Boris Johnson.
    42
  887. Yes, instead it makes them look childish.
    42
  888. For female audience members, she touches their hands. For male audience members, she uses her fan.
    42
  889. It's really strange. Here we have an American journalist in Ukraine reporting out there in the frontlines, yet people have never heard of him. Goes to show how one-sided the media in the west is.
    42
  890. Chinese President Xi and Russian President Putin enjoy high level of approval from Chinese and Russians respectively. Meanwhile, the approvals of Western politicians by their people are at an all-time low.
    42
  891. Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors. However, it's a shame that many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands as unwelcome.
    42
  892. It's like she won't take NO for an answer. She'll just reiterate her question of "Are you going to condemn Russia?" (expressed in different forms) until she finally hears the answer she's been waiting for all this time.
    42
  893. Some overseas Chinese (but not all) tend to have the "colonial mentality" of worshipping Anglo Saxon culture while harboring disdain for any "non-white" culture (including their own). I know of at least one Hong Kong Chinese that moved to Canada, that still retains such a mindset.
    42
  894. Confucius envisioned a golden age over a two millennia ago: "And then men would care for all elders as if they were their own parents, love all children as if they were their own children. The aged would grow old and die in security; the youthful would have opportunities to contribute and prosper; and children would grow up under the guidance and protection of all. Widows, orphans, the disabled, the diseased - everyone will be cared for and loved."
    42
  895.  @HermanWillems  Which of China's heritage has been destroyed? China is home to many historical monuments like The Great Wall of China, The Forbidden City, Terracotta Army, The Grand Canal (world's longest artificial river) to name a few. According to UNESCO, China ranks 2nd in the world in total number of World Heritage Sites, just behind Italy at number one. How exactly is China's heritage destroyed?
    42
  896.  @patrikpass2962  Previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held in Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's 1997 handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally have democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    42
  897.  @MH-il1lk  At around the 12 minute mark of the video, he said that in general, the population of Russia lives "not good" based on average apartment size. But average apartment size doesn't necessarily translate into living good lives. In my opinion, the home ownership rate is perhaps a better gauge of whether the population lives a better quality life.
    42
  898.  @thefreestylefrEaK  The population of Uighurs and Tibetans in China have nearly quadrupled in size.
    42
  899. Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. ... But it's already 2019 and China's economy is still going strong. So why do people still continue to believe the Western anti-China propaganda when it has been consistently proven wrong for almost 30 years already?
    41
  900. With left hand holding a beggar bowl upfront, while the right hand hiding a dagger behind.
    41
  901. China used a proverb to summarized its stance. "Let he who tied the bell on the tiger, be the one to take it off" (解铃还须系铃人)
    41
  902. It's like a boxing match between USA and China. Except that the U.S is busy punching himself and hurting himself. While China is busy doing push-ups to get stronger.
    41
  903. Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors. However, many Westerners (but not all) are increasing regarding Chinese in their lands as unwelcome.
    41
  904. China is taking it step further by promoting the farming of fish and expanding aquaculture capacity.
    41
  905.  @blafonovision4342  When I think of Wolf Warrior Diplomacy, I think of American diplomats like Jake Sullivan, John Kirby and Anthony Blinken.
    41
  906. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. On the other hand, many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a bleak outlook of the future.
    41
  907. Ukrainian soldier: "Sir, we lack artillery shells." Zelenskyy: "Do we have FPV drones?" Ukrainian soldier: "Just barely enough." Zelenskyy: "Use FPVs to supplement the artillery" ... Ukrainian soldier: "Sir, we are now running out of FPVs and we still lack artillery shells!"
    41
  908. Yet Nelson Mandela was once on the U.S terror watchlist.
    41
  909.  @billyehh  China is home to 90% of the world's rare earth metals production. Rare Earths are used in technology like magnets and super magnets, motors, metal alloys, electronic and computing equipment, batteries, catalytic converters, petroleum refining, medical imaging, colouring agents in glass and ceramics, phosphors, lasers and special glass. Since you're boycotting China, have you gotten rid of all your products that contain rare earths from China?
    41
  910. Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out against reunification stems from perceived U.S support. But it's no secret that U.S is in decline and China is rising. Time is on China's side, and as long as peace prevails, the U.S would decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise. By then, Taiwan's backing would evaporate and reunification with the mainland will be inevitable. The mainland should try not to get suckered into an unnecessary conflict over Taiwan.
    41
  911. Pakistan is China's dear friend, we call Pakistani our Iron Brother (巴铁) because our bond is as strong as iron 🇨🇳 🇵🇰
    41
  912. Tiangong-1 was launched in 2011, originally with expected operational lifespan of 2 years. But its already 2018, and the spacestation has long since been decommissioned and is reentering Earth's atmosphere after its service. Just like when America's Skylab create news sensation back in 1979 during its reentry, this is the natural conclusion to after the spacestation outlived its usefulness.
    41
  913.  @TheEVEInspiration  "That is totally irrelevant, look at what a country does. Listen to what companies report that actually wend there." So I take it that you've never actually set foot inside China nor have you talked to people who work here? Yet, you're calling me naïve, when you've never been here? And it's funny how you seem to think China's economy is not doing well, then the recent figures indicate that China's economy expanded by 6%.
    41
  914. China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Egypt, and Rome eventually succumbed to history. Throughout its long history, China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous empires, yet China has survived the oftentimes violent passage of history to modern times relatively intact. History has shown that China has benefited from having a strong central government (i.e under the Emperor and the Imperial Court), and modern-day China is merely continuing on this tradition. Not all countries have to adopt Western style democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    41
  915. Indeed. John Harris' "Why is China so big" video is so full of it and Nathan Rich uploaded a 7 part series debunking it.
    41
  916. Deng's policy was appropriate back when China wasn't as prominent, but that policy is no longer appropriate today given that US has China in its sights.
    41
  917.  @mmm6214  Google left China because they were unable to capture the majority of China's market share compared to Chinese company Baidu. According to Forbes, Google fumbled with an initially inferior Chinese search engine launched in 2000, while Baidu grabbed the lead in China and kept it with several innovative search features customized for local tastes.
    41
  918. The US burned the bridge when they took down a Chinese weather balloon.
    41
  919.  @MarkYeung1  Back when When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today. That's what it means to be the founding father of the People's Republic of China, which country would disrespect their founding father?
    41
  920.  @distinctga5811  "神州 Shenzhou Iraq is far more prosperous than it was under Saddam." Former U.S President Bush had invaded Iraq on suspicion of harbouring Weapons of Mass Destruction, but after the Iraq War, no evidence of WMDs were ever found? Former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan had said that the U.S war in Iraq was illegal and that it violated the UN Charter.
    41
  921.  @fantasysportsanalysistfsa8938  China has many smartphone brands like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Oppo, Vivo, Realme, compared to the US's Apple.
    41
  922. Actually, the Chinese proverb is "Frog at the Bottom of the Well" (井底之蛙) and the meaning is that same, that they don't know how big the sky is because of the "tunnel vision" of being in a well.
    41
  923. Singapore and India were both former British colonies, so their people tend to have the colonial mentality. Colonial mentality is the internalized perception of ethnic or cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization, and such mindset may persist in the local people's mind long after the colonizers left.
    41
  924.  @asj685  mark yeung reminds me of those Hong Kongers who have a "colonial mentality" of worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture over others. Even though Hong Kong has decolonised, the "decolonization of the mind" is needed to undo the mental damage inflicted by the colonizer on the minds of the colonized.
    41
  925. It's the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Sinophobia and Russophobia in the West.
    41
  926.  @MarkYeung1  Hyperinflation occurred during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period under the Nationalist Kuomintang (KMT) government, whom eventually lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Taiwan island. The KMT leader Chiang kai-shek also transferred the mainland gold reserves from Shanghai to Taipei, leaving the mainland in ruins after WWII.
    41
  927. 我很惊讶，虽然你离开中国多年，你仍然能保持这么好的普通话流利水平，太厉害了！
    41
  928. China had experienced "brain drain" in the past when it was poor, but today the process is reversing as more Chinese scientists and engineers return to their motherland, bringing with them new knowledge and expertise to China.
    41
  929.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  "神州 Shenzhou why pick his post then." Because I feel like it? You keep on comparing me to @mansana but you hardly post anything on @mansana's posts then why do you keep bringing him up to me?
    41
  930. USA is playing Checkers where the goal is to clear the board of all opponent pieces. Russia is playing Chess where the goal is to checkmate/corner the opponent's King.
    40
  931. @abarthspider3479 You said: "Then you suppprt dictatorship." China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt eventually succumbed to history. China has always been governed under strong centralized government, and if such as system has proven successful for our country, then what's wrong with supporting such a system? It clearly works for China.
    40
  932. They are rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
    40
  933. Australia is in a worst state, Australia is located closer to Asia than America and China is Australia's biggest trading partner, yet Australian politicians like Scott Morrison are fanning anti-China sentiment in Australia and following US's anti-China stance. If war breaks out in Asia, Australia is going to be right at the front lines, so does Australia really want to travel down this path?
    40
  934.  @MH-il1lk  The Uighur population in Xinjiang has actually increased from over 8 million in 2000 to over 11 million in 2020.
    40
  935. It's thanks to people like you, Cyrus Janssen, Daniel Dumbrill, Nathan Rich, Living in China, Gweilo 60, Jerry Goode, JaYoe Nation (nuance), numuves, etc for showing the West what life is really like in China. However Western MSM will start taking notice of your channels and start targeting you, so please beware.
    40
  936. One is looking for new partners while the other is looking for new puppets.
    40
  937. Where China sees win-win cooperation, the US only sees a zero sum game.
    40
  938. Even the US Ambassador to China (R. Nicholas Burns) doesn't speak Mandarin nor can he understand Chinese characters.
    40
  939. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. Whereas many Westerners (but not all) tend to be pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    40
  940.  @relaxwhc  Thus far, all you seem to do is verbally insult me for my views, just because my views happen to differ from yours. Why not attempt to refute my points brought up instead of attacking me personally?
    40
  941. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled.
    40
  942.  @MrBAchompBAchomp  There was no such massacre inside the Square. Secret cables from the United States embassy in Beijing have shown there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square in June 1989. A Chilean diplomat (named Carlos Gallo and his wife) were visiting Beijing at that time and provided eyewitness account to the events unfolding in the Square. He said he did not observe any mass firing into the crowds inside the Square, and that the troops who entered the square were armed with anti-riot gear - truncheons and wooden clubs.
    40
  943.  @galling2052  You said: "Germany is a very socialy develeoped state. That reason why autocracies/dictatorships are viewed as dangerous is obivous." So Ukraine should be viewed in the same light right? Zelenskyy's term as President ended in May 2024, yet no elections are being held in Ukraine to elect a new leader. Furthermore, Zelenskyy has banned all the opposition media in the country.
    40
  944. In China's one party system, the party has to represent all 100% of Chinese citizen's interests. In the United State's two party system, there is only partial representation by either the Republicans or the Democrats who make up, say only 51% of American's interests (In truth, it's even less than that).
    40
  945. Smooth as silk, Elegant as porcelain, Subtle as tea, Light as paper, (which are all Chinese inventions by the way)
    40
  946. China's Covid-19 response: Sacrifice businesses to save lives. United State's Covid-19 response: Sacrifice lives to save businesses.
    40
  947. This automated port is made possible thanks to Huawei's 5G technology. Countries banning Huawei may stand to lose out on access to this technology.
    40
  948.  @TheCluesRNTheBlues  Unlike the colonial West, China has no history of founding overseas colonies in other continents. During the 14th Century, Zheng He led an armada of 300 ships (some of them 5-7 times the size of Columbus' Santa Maria flagship) and visited India, Africa, South East Asia and the Middle East. But the voyages were peaceful trading missions, not for conquest (unlike the colonial powers that arrived centuries later).
    39
  949. China has 5000 years of history of rising and falling dynasties, and is considered one of the world's oldest "continous" civilizations still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Greece and Egypt have long since faded to history.
    39
  950.  @andrenogueira5058  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    39
  951.  @GuyWhoLikesTheSnarkies1435  It's the wet dream of those anti-China people to see China crumble and fragment into different provinces, so they express support for separatist activities in China.
    39
  952. United States: "We will not send diplomats to the Beijing Olympics!" 5 Eyes countries: "Us too!" United States: "Sikes! We are applying for 18 officials to attend the Olympics!" 5 Eyes countries: "Wait what? What about us? How are we going to explain this to China?"
    39
  953. Canada literally detained Huawei's CEO's daughter for 3 years.
    39
  954.  @romanhrobot9347  Thanks to the National Security Law, peace has finally returned to Hong Kong after a year of protests and riots that wrecked Hong Kong's economy.
    39
  955.  @cchannel7857  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According to Gregory Clark, all available eyewitness present inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    39
  956. Zelenskyy's political party is called Servant of the People. Me thinks it should be renamed to Servant of the US.
    39
  957.  indiasuperclean6969  Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    39
  958.  vlADOLF PUTLER  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the U.S is a threat to global peace here.
    39
  959. Like taking a knife to a gunfight, Canada is sending infantry and snipers in a mechanized fight against Russian tanks and artillery.
    39
  960. According to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty; China's poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015, as measured by the percentage of people living on the equivalent of US$1.90 or less per day in 2011 purchasing price parity terms, which still stands in 2022.
    39
  961. 我们将继续努力，为中国创造更美好的未来。🇨🇳 We will continue our efforts to build a better future for China. 🇨🇳
    39
  962.  @benkem7584  China and Russia are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and its "allies).
    39
  963.  @tooltalk  China is in need of resources to feed our growing economy and China is buying those resources from Africa, and paying for it, compared to Western countries extracting resources from Africa in the past for free basically.
    39
  964.  @ironlionzion1380  Did Pan fan the flames on Weibo? He's humble and respectful but as I said, it doesn't mean that he's unwilling to speak out against any disrespect that was done to him.
    39
  965. Confucius said: "The noble man understands morality, while the petty man understands profit." Sam Altman only cared about profiting from his technology, while the developers of DeepSeek made the code open source and available to all.
    39
  966. Especially in Australia, anti-China sentiment is brewing there, even though Australia is located closer to Asia than America and China is Australia's biggest trading partner. Yet Australian politicians like Scott Morrison are fanning the flames of anti-China sentiment and following US's anti-China stance regarding China.
    39
  967. One should strive to improve oneself, instead of pulling others down.
    39
  968.  @sethaldrich6902  The United States is the largest single country funder of WADA, contributing about $3.4 million to WADA in 2023 (with a similar amount for 2024). If anything, WADA should be in the US pocket, not China's.
    39
  969. +Shoes The fact that the kanji is crammed into a smaller space makes stroke order even more important. There is literally no room for mistakes when you are writing a complex kanji in a small space. If you follow the stroke order correctly then you will minimize any wrong stroke that may or may not mess up the whole word. These stroke orders have been refined by scholars and calligraphers for a long time to their present order.
    38
  970. Okay, lets assume line thickness doesn't matter while writing. Let's write 田 for rice field. If we write 十 first then 口, there are a number of things that could go wrong. Your 十 may not form a square, or one of the edges could protrude and you may end up with 由 or 甲. The correct order should be ㄇ then 十 then finally __ Then it is less likely for the inner lines to protrude.  Even starting and ending points are important. For example, compare the first stroke of 千 (thousand) and 干 (dry) . 千 first stroke is from right to left (slight tilt) and 干 first stroke is from left to right (horizontal). Similar characters include 天 and 夭, 壬 and 王 and so on. Ancient Chinese is written using brushes, so scholars can observe the starting point and ending point of the brush stroke (thicker at start point, thinner at end point). If you take into account line thickness, then even simple words like 女 (woman) can look like 大 (big). But if you follow the stroke order, you can determine which character it is.  Sorry for using Chinese not Kanji but I'm sure there are Kanji examples as well.
    38
  971. Reminds me of the meme of President Xi having a good laugh after reading Trump's Art of the Deal book.
    38
  972. +LuvMyLilBabe China has been peaceful for 30 years and not at war with any country since our last major war in 1979. But USA has been waging wars in 21s century, like Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, and then cutting off those countries' heads (Muammar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now President Trump is eyeing Syria and the Assad Regime is next on the list.
    38
  973.  @ralphbernhard1757  A textbook example of gunboat diplomacy.
    38
  974.  @catmandu6776  In many other cities that previously hosted the Olympics, oftentimes the newly constructed Olympic facilities fall into disuse long after the Olympics is over. At least with Beijing, after the 2008 Summer Olympics, the constructed facilities were repurposed into hosting the 2022 Winter Olympics, then isn't that a good thing to reuse the previously built facilities? Then what's wrong with spinning this off as a good thing for China?
    38
  975.  @SaiKiran-fd3gq  China can always switch from labor to automation to remain competitive despite increasing wages. China is already the world's largest market for automation, and there are already automated warehouses, automated assembly lines and automated ports in China.
    38
  976.  @johannbraunstein1190  "During WW2 the USA stopped the victory of Germany over Russia." The Soviet Union contributed the most to the defeat of Germany during WWII. The Soviet Union was responsible for three quarters of all German military and materiel losses in the Second World War.
    38
  977. Those three are actually wolves in sheep clothing, and they are concerned with the opinions of the real sheep (of whom they prey upon.) That's why they have the overwhelming need to control the narrative in their favor.
    38
  978. The Philippines too. Many Filipinos (but not all of them) tend to have the colonial mentality. Colonial mentality is the internalized perception of ethnic and cultural inferiority as a result of colonization. They have an ingrained preference for Anglo Saxon culture over any "non-white" culture, including their own.
    38
  979. I had only wished that Cyrus took the time to properly research the Ukraine crisis, instead of rushing to produce a video response like he did with his previous 2 videos about Ukraine. I'm sure Cyrus is aware of American anti-China propaganda portraying China in a negative light, so he should also be aware of American anti-Russian propaganda doing the same to Russia.
    38
  980. China also experienced a reduction in pollution during lockdown.
    38
  981. How is this journalism? Who was that mysterious distorted voice on board the train? They just record some unnamed voice as pass it off as an Uighur and you believe it?
    38
  982.  @leehongjin6884  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Kenya, Nigeria, Chad, Sudan, Tanzania, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, etc. Whereas United States is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is enacting regime change by bombing those countries and cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now USA is eying Assad of Syria and Maduro of Venezuela, and nearly started another war with Iran this time.
    38
  983. Their goal is to keep Americans divided over domestic issues, while cementing their support for pro-war foreign policy
    38
  984.  @alloomis1635  China's political system combines the aspects of Eastern meritocracy with Western democracy, in what Prof Zhang Weiwei termed as "Selection + Election." Selection: Candidates must take and pass various exams and tests to prove their competence. Election: Candidates must also be able to sell their policies to other communist party members and gain their support. Such a system produces candidates that not only have good grades, but also able to garner support for their policies.
    38
  985. Indeed. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    38
  986.  @TacticalMayo  Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and its "allies.)
    38
  987. She should engage Chinese infrastructure companies to build/maintain the highways there. Except that would be seen as political suicide to her career.
    38
  988. It's like the cartoon where Wild. E Coyote chases Road Runner off a cliff, yet continues to run over mid-air. There's nothing supporting him underneath and it's only a matter of time before he realizes and gravity "catches up" to him.
    38
  989. Apart from the social credit system, some Westerners also believe the organ harvesting rumors in China.
    38
  990.  @MarkYeung1  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" ROC, China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the PRC in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    38
  991. I hope that Eileen Gu not only inspires more Chinese athletes to take up winter sports here in China, but to also inspire oversea Chinese and people of Chinese descent to be proud of their motherland.
    38
  992. Singapore has also learned from China in the past. Chinese immigrants to Singapore help build their ports, hospitals, schools. Even till today, there are Chinese workers working in Singapore to build their country.
    38
  993.  @robinlanganasanga6691  Some people suffer from a "colonial mentality", where they feel that their own inherent culture is somehow inferior to Anglo-Saxon culture.
    38
  994.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Not just her research, but the Lowy Institute has also published an article debunking the myth of China's "debt-trap diplomacy" In our report, recently published by Chatham House, Lee Jones and I (Shahar Hameiri argue, however, that the assumptions underlying Australia’s response to the BRI are mistaken. China’s “debt-trap diplomacy” is a myth. ... Source: Debunking the myth of China’s “debt-trap diplomacy”
    38
  995.  @chrisbell238  India is also classified as a developing country and they have the world's 2nd largest population apart from China, and they are a Western democracy as well, yet why hasn't India flourished like China?
    38
  996. Modern China was built by the sweat, blood, tears and sacrifice of Chinese people to turn a poor, war-torn, starving country, into the world's 2nd largest economy, defended by army with world's 2nd largest military expenditure, as well as potential rival to USA, in only 30 years.
    38
  997. Exactly. U.S banned Google's Android OS from Huawei phones, so the solution is for Huawei to develop their own domestic operating system, HarmonyOS. The same thing is going to happen with chips.
    38
  998. American "exceptionalism" at its worst.
    38
  999. Russia had asked for investigation in the UN twice. Both times it was rejected.
    37
  1000. It looks like a Seafood Market in Wuhan, selling the harvest of the ocean, like shrimp, crawfish, eels, shellfish. Even Japanese and Korean Markets sell live seafood.
    37
  1001.  @rickreese5794  Not only do we remember what happened to the USS Liberty, but also of that American activist in the West Bank that was shot by the IDF.
    37
  1002. I'm Chinese and I say "Jai Hind"
    37
  1003.  @elanor2123  You said: "The ccp won die to the KMT's weakened state after the war." The KMT forces still outnumbered the communists even after the war. After the Japanese surrendered in 1945, the KMT had a strength of: -2 million (regular) -2.3 million (militia) (June 1946) ... Whereas the communists had a strength of: -1.2 million (regular) -2.6 million (militia) (July 1945) ... Source: Wikipedia: Chinese Civil War So even after the Japanese surrendered in 1945, the KMT still outnumbered the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? And mind you this was after the Japanese surrendered in 1945, so there was no more fighting the Japanese.
    37
  1004. If they truly lived up to their namesake, NGOs have nothing to fear from a new law calling for increased transparency in where they obtain their funds from. Otherwise, they don't deserve to be called nongovernmental organisations.
    37
  1005. China is facilitating the shift towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, from the uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (that of the U.S and its "allies").
    37
  1006. If the DPP separatists want to declare independence, they should get out of the Chinese territory of Taiwan and find some other plot of land to claim for themselves.
    37
  1007.  @TheScotian82  There are 2nd generation Chinese Americans who were born on American soil, and grew up there, yet they've being regarded as "perpetual foreigners."
    37
  1008.  @ColoniaMurder20  Many Filipinos (but not all) tend to have the "colonial mentality," of worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture while harboring a distaste for any "non-white" culture (including their own). Did you forget the American-Phillipine war in which hundreds of thousands of Filipinos died fighting for freedom from the U.S, but in the end Philippines became an American colony?
    37
  1009. Chinese people have helped build infrastructure like roads, railways, schools, hospitals, hotels shopping centers, football stadiums and telecommunication projects in African countries like Angola, Nigeria, Kenya, etc. China has probably done more to help develop Africa in decades, as compared to what Westerners did for centuries in Africa.
    37
  1010.  @lorellaldos5263  Even without access to cutting edge manufacturing equipment, China managed to fabricate a 7 nanometer chip using existing lithography equipment.
    37
  1011.  @MrNeversweat  A certain Uncle Sam comes to mind.
    37
  1012. Joe Burns Mao Zedong did not kill millions people out of "greed". They were starved unintentionally because of events like the Great Chinese Famine during 1950s and 1960s. And Chinese people are still majors in our own lands, but look at Native Americans and Australian aboriginals. They were once the majority but have been reduced to being minorities in their own lands.
    37
  1013.  @Gobsmacked52  As long as Putin and Xi are able to continue delivering economic progress for Russians and Chinese, then can't they be allowed to remain in power? Such competent leaders are hard to find these days, so when one is discovered why not allow him to remain in charge in order to maximize the benefits to Russia and China?
    37
  1014. Back when China was still a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, China also suffered massive brain drain as intellectual people left China for the West. Today however, Sinophobic sentiment in the West is actually fueling a "reverse brain drain" where intellectual people migrate from a developed country to a developing country (i.e from the West to China in this case).
    37
  1015.  @niewazneniewazne1890  What are you talking about? Beijing has granted autonomy to various regions of China, such as Tibet Autonomous Region, Inner Mongolia and Hong Kong SAR. But the point is that US is making bold and blatant statements about autonomy over another country, France.
    37
  1016. Seems like they have to make an obligatory anti-Putin remark one way or another.
    37
  1017. +Arabadaba washington Unlike the European colonial powers, China wasn't that interested in creating overseas colonies. During Ming Dynasty (1400s), China's naval power was supreme, and Admiral Zheng He made seven voyages, across Africa, India, the Middle East, leading an armada of over 300 ships. Some of these ships were 4-5 times the size of Columbus' Santa Maria flagship, but it was a merchant convoy, interested in trade rather than conquest. Video: Zheng He (by CrashCourseHistory) youtube.com/watch?v=NjEGncridoQ&t=126s
    37
  1018. Pakistan is China's dear friend, we call Pakistani our Iron Brother (巴铁) because our bond is as strong as iron 🇨🇳 🇵🇰
    37
  1019. Thanks to the National Security Law, peace has finally returned to Hong Kong after a year of protests and riots that wrecked Hong Kong's economy.
    37
  1020. Many Westerners tend to take a black & white view of issues, where's the Chinese view is perhaps more nuanced. It's like the Yin Yang symbol ☯ where there is a small white dot in the black space, and a small black dot in the white space. It's all about balance of opposing forces.
    37
  1021.  @JackJill-lv2xm  The appointment of leaders is in accordance with Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45, which states that: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." – Article 45, Hong Kong Basic Law Therefore, Beijing (aka the Central's People's Government) reserves the right to appoint the Chief Executive of Hong Kong as per Article 45 of Hong Kong Basic Law.
    37
  1022. Officially no boots on the ground. But I wonder who is driving those Bradleys and M1 Abrams in Ukraine, since Ukrainian soldiers aren't given sufficient training to pilot those western vehicles.
    37
  1023. If Ukraine was truly winning the war against Russia, then why does Zelenskyy pleading for NATO to impose a No-Fly Zone if Ukraine was winning?
    37
  1024. Hopefully the people of Taiwan island (and also the Philippines) learn from this phrase not to follow in the footsteps of Ukraine.
    37
  1025. All superpowers rise and fall. Britain was colonial superpower since 19th century, but has since been surpassed by USA during 20th century. But it looks as though China is set to dominate the 21st century.
    37
  1026. Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors. However, many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands as unwelcome.
    37
  1027. Trump actually has a Chinese nickname 川建国 "Chuan Jianguo” which translates to “Trump the (Chinese) Nation Builder" because his policies are actually "making China great again."
    37
  1028. The transition to a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices from a uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (that of U.S and its allies) cannot be complete without the adoption of an alternative to the U.S dollar.
    36
  1029. Also safer for the world if the US military-industrial complex are included in the ban.
    36
  1030. After creating Arab Spring in the Middle East, the United States now wants to do the same thing to South East Asia.
    36
  1031. I think instead of democracy, we should look at it as good governance. If a government is unable to deliver what the people want (i.e U.S) then can it truly be called a democracy? However, if a government is able to consistently deliver what the people want (i.e China's) then doesn't it fit the definition of a democracy?
    36
  1032.  @aceshadowins1310  So American tourists don't visit this Cambodian boy's location? Not even once? Nobody picked on this boy's multilingualism except China?
    36
  1033. The United States has been publishing lists of companies that "threaten US national security" so China is merely doing the same thing in return.
    36
  1034.  @zetristan4525  "you're living in the opposite spirit, yourself..." How so? I learned English in order to better understand others, yet you're claiming I'm living in the opposite spirit?
    36
  1035.  @MH-il1lk  No, the actual overall Uighur population itself in Xinjiang has grown. And if you want to talk about prison populations, it's actually the United States that has the world's largest prison population.
    36
  1036. China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    36
  1037.  @TheEVEInspiration  "Listen to what companies report that actually wend there." According to Reuters, China was ranked the largest recipient of foreign investment in 2020, so despite what you think, many foreign companies are continuing to invest in our country.
    36
  1038. Agreed. Out of the Google ban on Huawei by the USA, Huawei's HarmonyOS was born.
    36
  1039. Some people in Hong Kong (but not all) are still suffering from a subservient "colonial mentality" a remnant of its colonial days. Even thought after 1997, Hong Kong has been physically decolonized, the "decolonization of the mind" still needs to happen in order to heal the mental damage the colonizers inflicted on the minds of the colonized.
    36
  1040. United States is consist of Caucasians Americans (white), African Americans (black), Latin Americans (brown), Asian Americans (yellow) and of course, Native Americans (red) but apparently people still believe it doesn't make sense for Tibet to be part of China because they are "ethnically different".
    36
  1041. Patrick Lancaster has interviewed civilian survivors in Mariupol and turns out it was the Ukrainians behind it all along (words taken from Marupol civilians)
    36
  1042. Agreed. Putin has been asking for assurances that NATO not expand eastwards i.e that Ukraine not be allowed to join NATO. Many NATO countries also don't want Ukraine to join NATO (due to corruption issues) but they refused to put it down in writing to assure Putin. But Putin's words have been falling on deaf ears all along in the West.
    36
  1043.  @happyhappynuts  I use logic to argue my case, but it appears that you're unable to contribute to the discussion so you resort to hurling insults against me for my views. Just because my views happen to differ from yours.
    36
  1044. USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    36
  1045.  @PahatRout  Indeed. Brian has long exposed that Aung San Suu Kyi is a Ned puppet.
    36
  1046. But besides worshiping imaginary god, Chinese people also worship our ancestors, actual people who lived, worked, and died on these very lands, and whose engineering marvels contributed to China. Look at the Grand Canal (longest artificial river in the world) and even the Great Wall of China for example.
    36
  1047.  @Elfan97-ec1uk  There are instances where I spoke Mandarin (mainland dialect) in Hong Kong and some of the locals treated me coldly. But when I switch to speaking English, many Hong Kongers started warming up to me.
    36
  1048. Imagine the phrase "Under President Trump's leadership" being changed to "Under President Trump's rule" for example.
    36
  1049.  @Frog1652  You said "simple for the 5th fleet to cut that supply" If President Xi's visit to Saudi Arabia results in an economic deal for China to buy Saudi Oil, then the U.S Navy cutting off that supply won't make Saudi Arabia happy with what the U.S is doing. Additionally, China can also step up buying oil from Russia. Already the Power of Siberia gas pipeline is supplying China with Russian gas, and there are plans for a second pipeline between Russia and China.
    36
  1050. Indeed. Putin had wanted assurance that NATO would not expand eastwards (i.e that Ukraine not be allowed to join NATO). In fact, many NATO countries like Germany and France were reluctant to admit Ukraine into NATO (because of corruption allegations) yet NATO refused to put this down on paper to reassure Putin. After realizing that his words have fallen on deaf ears for years, Putin finally acted.
    36
  1051. Before I went to sleep, my wife was complaining to me: "This Russia is such a bad country, if Ukraine wants to join NATO, it is their business and freedom, Russia has no right to intervene. This is just an excuse for Russia to invade Ukraine." I said nothing, got out of bed and went to the kitchen, before returning to bed with knife in my hand. I told my wife: "Let's go to sleep" Upon seeing the knife, my wife sat up abruptly and looked at me with wide eyes. "What are you doing? Sleeping with a knife?!" she exclaimed. I replied: "Don’t worry about it, let’s go to sleep. Besides, me sleeping with a knife is none of your business and it is my freedom." My wife said: "You're crazy! How can I sleep when you are lying next to me with a knife? What if you accidentally cut me?" I replied: “Well, you don’t even trust your own husband, how can you expect Russia to trust Ukraine? Sleeping with a knife is like Ukraine joining the NATO." .... An anonymous analogy taken off Weibo.
    36
  1052.  @billyehh  Vietnam had invaded Cambodia in 1978 and disposed of its government, occupying Cambodia without installing any government. China is Cambodia's ally so China decided to embark on a punitive mission in Vietnam to punish them for such behavior.
    36
  1053. ​ @GratefulExpress  Con men like Peter get away with scamming others by saying sweet, pleasant words that he knows his audience desperately want to hear, in order to reinforce their biases.
    36
  1054. Most young people today are already glued to their phones even while out in public. AR glasses and other such devices could possibly facilitate better integration of cyberspace with reality. Whereas in the U.S's cases, they seem more interested in creating a virtual reality that exists separately.
    36
  1055. Agreed. During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist KMT had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communist's right to rule China.
    36
  1056. With an increase in freedom of speech, there should be a corresponding increase in taking responsibility for what's being said.
    35
  1057.  vlADOLF PUTLER  Do Canadians even remember the occupations of the two Michaels? Whereas everyone knows Meng is Huawei's CFO.
    35
  1058.  vlADOLF PUTLER  "神州 Shenzhou Canada is not an elitist dictatorship" Canadian "Freedom Convoy" Truckers literally had their bank accounts suspended and frozen, just for exercising their right to free speech.
    35
  1059. +Dashmeet Singh Countries with large population will have more mouths to feed and most families favor boys because of their ability to work (although girls could work too) and contribute to income. Its a matter of pragmatism, and in India especially there is often a dowry associated when a girl gets married and the cost has to be burdened by the bride's family.
    35
  1060.  @JonROlsen  I used to think that just because Kevin Rudd learned to speak some Mandarin, that he would understand China. But sadly, this was not the case, and his words remained aligned with the US mindset.
    35
  1061.  @abreathoffreshair1  Firstly, Taiwan is not a country, even their constitution states that Taiwan is part of China. Secondly, President Xi Jinping is committed to peaceful integration of Taiwan with the mainland, but it's because of the U.S House of Speakers representative visit to the island that that People's Liberation Army was mobilized to defend our sovereignty.
    35
  1062. Being World Police is a tiring, taxing and thankless position to be in.
    35
  1063.  @MarkYeung1  Who said China doesn't support Ukraine? China supports peaceful negotiations to end the conflict in Ukraine and China has sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine. Whereas NATO countries are sending lethal aid to Ukraine so isn't NATO the warmonger here?
    35
  1064. An American asked an immigrant: "Why don't you go back to where you come from if you don't like America's domestic policy?" The immigrant replied: "Because your foreign policy is much worst, it devastated the country where I'm from, that's why I immigrated to America."
    35
  1065. When a lie gets repeated so often that the lie itself starts believing it Israel. ... ... ... Get it? Believing it is real?
    35
  1066.  @jls3489  Are you Filipino? Did you know what US did to the Philippines? They initially promised Philippines independence from Spain, but after the American-Spanish war, they broke their promise and made Philippines an American colony. An estimated 250,000 Filipinos died as a result of the American-Philippine war.
    35
  1067.  @slydawwg  China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them.
    35
  1068. When Americans make racist remarks about Chinese eating bats, it turns out those bat-eating videos were filmed outside China, in Palau Island near Indonesia. But do they know that some Americans (not all) have eaten smoked bat in Florida? You can actually find an= 2012 article about Floridians eating smoke bat.
    35
  1069. Countries should also not presume that just because the current superpower abuses it's power, that an upcoming superpower will somehow also do the same as it's predecessor. It's just projection of the current superpower's crimes onto another that isn't even in power yet.
    35
  1070.  @zetristan4525  What makes you think I'm being paid to post streams of comments?
    35
  1071.  @zetristan4525  Because the government has transformed China from a previously dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy (or the largest if measured by purchasing power parity), the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest army, the People's Liberation Army. According to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty as China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to 0.7% in 2015. If not for the government, where would China be today? Probably still a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves (as was during the Republic of China Era) with warlords ruling various provinces of China.
    35
  1072. +Yu G China built world's largest hyrdroelectric power station, the Three Gorges Dam in order to supply clean renewable energy and power our growth. China is also home to world's largest photovoltaic power station, the 850 MW Longyangxia Dam Solar Park in Qinghai province.
    35
  1073. Africa is arguably the wealthiest continent on the planet in terms of natural resources. Africa just needs to learn to be able to tap into these resources and harness the wealth for themselves.
    34
  1074.  Beast Mode  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    34
  1075. US programs the coordinates into the missile, and Ukraine pushes the button.
    34
  1076.  @mairo38able  Could you perhaps name some examples of criticism made by EU politician towards the United States? Like the whole Nordstream issue, the pipeline was supplying Germany with cheap Russian gas, and Joe Biden was against the project all along. Yet the Olaf Scholz didn't raise the issue with him.
    34
  1077.  @ColoniaMurder20  But if you go to Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan it says that the current Taiwanese aborigines are believed to be the descendants of farmers from mainland China, who arrived on the island 5,000 years ago. Around 5,000 years ago, farmers from the southeast Chinese coast settled on the island. These people are believed to have been speakers of Austronesian languages, which dispersed from Taiwan across the islands of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The current Taiwanese aborigines are believed to be their descendants. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan)
    34
  1078. China has even preserved the Mongolian written script in Inner Mongolia province. Whereas the people in Outer Mongolian use the Cyrillic script by Russia.
    34
  1079. Hong Kong's economy made up 18 percent of China's after its return to the mainland in 1997. Today, Hong Kong's economy only makes up 2 percent of China's.
    34
  1080. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China someday surpassing the United States in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    34
  1081. China is a country of homeowners with more than 90% of households owning homes (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes (Huang et al., 2020), higher than many developed nations (e.g. 3%–4% in Australia and Northern Ireland; 13% in the U.S. and about 10% in Britain (Resolution Foundation, August 2017; Paris, 2010; Choi, Hong, & Scheinkman, 2014).
    34
  1082. Joe Burns Why is Mao Zedong "evil" and greedy? Mao had nearly nothing at the beginning, but he turned the communist party from only 50 members at the beginning, into one of the world's largest political parties today. Pre-Mao China was dirt-poor, war-torn and starving. Pre Mao China was divided, Tibet broke free of Chinese rule, and individual provinces were ruled by individual warlords and the KMT (Nationalists) failed to unify China during its rule from 1912 to 1949. But Mao unified China under communism, which previous KMT administration failed to do, and if not for Mao, then China would be fragmented into regions like Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Hong Kong, Taiwan, etc, just like when Soviet Union collapsed and the satellite states broke free. Although Mao's later policies were disasterous, if not for Mao, we would not have a unified China today to even speak off.
    34
  1083. 我们将继续努力～为中国创造更美好的未来。🇨🇳 We will continue our efforts to build a better future for China. 🇨🇳
    34
  1084.  @bharathsf  Colonial mentality is a phenomena that continues to affect many people in former colonies. The colonizer not only colonize lands, but they also colonize the people's minds, through their interactions and education systems. Even after the colonizers left, the people's mind remains enslaved and loyal to their former masters.
    34
  1085. If USA, UK, Canada, Australia, and Western countries etc, decide to boycott the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics, then it would be their athlete's loss if they do so. More gold medals for China then.
    34
  1086. At the beginning, the local Wuhan government was rather incompetent, so the central government fired Wuhan officials and took over management of Wuhan, which was how Wuhan managed to recover in the end.
    34
  1087. The fact that the current US Ambassador to China doesn't even speak Mandarin, indicates just how much the US knows about China.
    34
  1088. Being surrounded by people speaking Mandarin will definitely improve his proficiency.
    34
  1089. Covid-19 is like a global test that everyone has to take. China studied extremely hard for the exam and passed with flying colours and we are now celebrating our well-deserved graduation ceremony. Whereas Western countries had extra time to prepare for the test, yet many Westerners laughed at China's misfortune and mocked China's answers as too "draconian." Yet now they are accusing China of cheating, yet they are now blatantly copying China's homework after ridiculing them earlier.
    34
  1090.  @dertythegrower  China is the most optimistic country in the world according to Statista. In China, three quarters of the respondents in a survey were optimistic about the future. This compares to less than 30 percent in Japan and only about one third in Italy, the Netherlands, and France. Worldwide, just above 40 percent of the respondents felt optimistic about the future. The survey was conducted in 2023.
    34
  1091. Americans are complaining about Chinese "stealing their jobs" then consider this question: Are Americans themselves willing to work for the same low pay as Chinese workers? If not, then prices of American goods will be expensive as compared to Chinese goods, and that's why the US corporations seek cheaper labor elsewhere.
    34
  1092.  @andrewwong2605  "Where do you think Covid-19 come from." I'm guessing Fort Detrick. But whenever China or Russia voices concern over U.S bioweapons development, we aren't taken seriously. Victoria Nuland's admission of Ukraine bio research facilities could be the start of a new investigation.
    34
  1093. China already harnesses energy from molten salt reactors in the Gobi Desert, through a array of mirrors (i.e reflective surfaces, not solar panels) that focus the Sun's rays towards a central tower containing molten salt, heating the salt up to thousands of degrees which is then used to generate electricity. The molten salt retains so much heat during the day, that even throughout the night, the solar plant can continue to generate electricity from residue heat.
    34
  1094. The Red Scare (fear of communism) combined with the Yellow Peril (fear of being overrun by Asians) is what's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in Australia.
    34
  1095. Exactly. The U.S accuses China of potentially sending military equipment to Russia, but then the U.S sees nothing wrong in selling military equipment to Taiwan island.
    34
  1096.  @rksleung  Tell mark yeung that Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Malaysia did not choose the United States politically. Vietnam is socialist republic under the communist party. Cambodia is constitutional monarchy with the king as the head of state. Laos is one-party parliamentary socialist republic where LPR Party reigns supreme. Thailand is a constitutional monarchy, whereby a hereditary monarch is head of state. Malaysia is a constitutional monarchy, where the king is head of state. Even Singapore has been governed by a single party, the PAP for its entire life.
    33
  1097.  vlADOLF PUTLER  Go for what? Since Taiwan hasn't amended their constitution to formally declared independence, that means Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution, so what more needs to be said?
    33
  1098. Meng Wanzhou was arrested in Canada in 2018 even though Meng did not break any Canadian laws while in Canada. Yet it's already been 2 years, yet Meng's trial still hasn't concluded yet? USA needs to buy time to fabricate false evidence against Meng?
    33
  1099. Agreed. And now Beijing is officially the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both the Summer Olympics (2008) and the Winter Olympics (2022).
    33
  1100.  @justnow5809  Unlikely. An ambassador not being able to speak the language of the country he/she is assigned to, simply puts the ambassador at a disadvantage in politics/diplomacy.
    33
  1101.  @ColoniaMurder20  65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng (洪石成) was killed by gunfire from the Philippines Coastguard (patrol boat Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) but which Filipino fisherman have been killed by Chinese coastguard? Answer: None!
    33
  1102.  @DJs021  Yes. Some Filipino have the "colonial mentality," as a result of Philippines becoming a U.S colony after losing the American-Philippine War. He doesn't mind Philippines preparing for war over a Chinese island that's of no interest to the Philippines, and he thinks the U.S will help them.
    33
  1103.  @CaptainTerps  China is not removing trees, in fact China is planting trees. Even NASA's satellite images reveal that the Earth is a greener place today than it was 20 years ago, thanks to the greening efforts of China and India.
    33
  1104. Silicon chips are reaching the theoretical limit of just how small scientists can make them. As the size of silicon chips approaches that of silicon's atomic size, the transistor's processing power will cease to improve further. Photonic chips and carbon-based chips demonstrate potential as possible alternatives and China is investing in these technologies.
    33
  1105. You can watch a documentary on the Nakba. Palestinians are calling this Nakba 2.0
    33
  1106. @nathanblaylock If such a system you've described has shown to beneficial to China, then can't China continue on with this system? Not all countries have to adopt "Western-style democracy" to be successful, and China is living proof of this
    33
  1107. The Earth's fossil fuel reserves are ultimately limited and will eventually run out one day in the future, which is one reason why electric vehicles are the way to go.
    33
  1108. Nato desperately needs an off-ramp in Ukraine, but all they have is an escalator.
    33
  1109.  @neepers  If so, what makes you think he's a Chinese bot? Have you got an issue against Chinese like those Western athletes?
    33
  1110.  @lancemollenhauer9740  China had sounded off the alarm about a new pneumonia-like strain to the World Health Organization, yet you're singling out China?
    33
  1111. China has many historical monuments like the Great Wall of China, Forbidden City, Qin Emperor Tomb, Terracotta Army, The Grand Canal, (World's longest canal or artificial river), yet some anti-China Westerners told me that "Chinese culture is destroyed"
    33
  1112.  @Raumweiter  NATO has expanded into 15 countries, right up to Russia's doorstep, and NATO is certainly not a defensive organization (having been involved in wars in the Middle East). Also, the 2014 Crimea Referendum results revealed that an overwhelming majority (i.e 96.77%) voted to join the Russian Federation.
    33
  1113. To see the past 3,000 years of Chinese history, visit Xi'an. To see the past 300 years of Chinese history, visit Beijing. To see the past 30 years of Chinese history, visit Shanghai. To see what the future will be like, visit Shenzhen.
    33
  1114. Carl Zha is a walking encyclopedia of Chinese history.
    33
  1115.  @Sean-giang  Floods and instability are beyond China's control. However, it doesn't change the fact that jobs have been created as a result of CPEC.
    33
  1116. +MrTrashComaktor Agreed. The US marines stationed in Okinawa can sometimes rape the local Okinawans, and the Japanese government can't do anything about it. Governor Takeshi Onaga has already largely been the driving force behind efforts to get rid of the US base on the island since coming into power in 2014. Source: US Marine confesses to raping Japanese tourist in Okinawa rt.com/news/344560-marine-rape-okinawa-confession/
    33
  1117.  @dianasong4594  It's just as racist as comparing Barack Obama to King Kong.
    33
  1118.  @MarkYeung1  Russia already did call for a UN investigation into Bucha. Since April 2022 mind you.
    33
  1119.  @Jamrock151  During the 19th Century, the British couldn't get enough of Chinese tea, but China did not want what the West had to offer, so Britain fought two wars with China and forced us to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which China didn't want because it made our people sick. Chinese port cities were forced to open up to opium, and Hong Kong was taken and made into a British colony to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout the rest of China.
    33
  1120. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US and its "allies").
    32
  1121. Many in Hong Kong (but not all) tend to retain the "colonial mentality" of living under British rule, long after Hong Kong's 1997 handover back to China. Just as how Hong Kong needs physical decolonization, the minds of its people need to undergo decolonization as well.
    32
  1122. +Shelby Jean China at that time was suffering from overpopulation (like what India is suffering today) and there wasn't enough resources to support our expanding population. Child mortality rates were high and so was child malnutrition, and there weren't enough schools to send our kids to. So why have multiple kids per family, when there's no enough food to feed all of them, not enough schools to send our kids to, and insufficient healthcare for them? Why not devote your resources into raising a single healthy child past childhood and into a good school?
    32
  1123.  @julion89  'cos China is athiest?
    32
  1124.  @multiplierfx6429  Looks like India needs a "cultural revolution" of sorts, to shake off the colonial mindset of worshipping Anglo Saxon culture.
    32
  1125. According to Global Innovation Index 2017, China is among the Top 25 most innovative countries in the world, and China is the only middle-income country on the Top 25 list.
    32
  1126. A long-term survey by Harvard University and Ash Center has revealed that 80-90 percent of Chinese citizens support the Chinese government. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    32
  1127.  @cchannel7857  Search for an article: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies (By Gregory Clark)
    32
  1128.  @MarkYeung1  The 2019 Hong Kong riots had been ongoing for more than a year, before the mainland finally took action, and since then, peace has been resorted to Hong Kong. Would you have preferred the 2019 HK riots to last forever instead of being put to a stop?
    32
  1129. Trump: "America will gain access to the Arctic through annexing Greenland." Greenland: "No." Trump: "Well, there's always Canada."
    32
  1130.  @MrBAchompBAchomp  Yeah, you worry about shootings, healthcare, rising cost of living and a whole other slew of issues. Different country, different problems.
    32
  1131. Hopefully Ukraine will also realize that NATO doesn't want its membership.
    32
  1132. The "Yellow Peril" mindset never died out. Since 19th century, Westerners have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-liberal democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many Westerners to fathom.
    32
  1133. The Americans had promised to grant Philippines independence if they helped them against the Spanish. But instead, the Americans broke their promise and took Philippines as an American colony, resulting in the Philippine–American War where an estimated 200,000 Filipino civilians died. The Philippines lost the war and became an American colony.
    32
  1134. U.S should fix its domestic issues first instead of worrying about other countries. They can't seem to get their own house in order, yet they want to intervene in other house's internal affairs.
    32
  1135.  @christopherhamlin6139  1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2022, and China's economy is still going strong.
    32
  1136.  @valenrn8657  Xinjiang was part of China even before Jesus Christ himself was born. Xinjiang was known as Xiyu (西域) since 3rd century BC during Han Dynasty, and Tibet was part of China since 14th century after the Mongols conquered both the Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China.
    32
  1137.  Wangbei Gao  C'mon, you really think his/her real name is Hamster Chan? With a first name like Hamster? Really? It's more likely that Hamster Chan is a nick name, where Chan is Japanese honorific to appear cutesy and child-like, not that his/her name is Hamster Chan. Unless of course, I'm mistaken and his/her real name really is Hamster Chan.
    32
  1138. When China is praised, then reputation of all Asians rise. When China is demonised, then reputation of all Asians suffer in the end.
    32
  1139. China's top chip maker, SMIC has made a chip breakthrough in the production of 7nm chips for semiconductors, in defiance of U.S sanctions, and advancing its technology by one or two generations.
    32
  1140.  @hardshell9236  Cyrus Jannsen videos have the peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" so he's certainly not one of those warmongers.
    32
  1141. China has done many engineering feats in the past like Grand Canal and the Great Wall. This is only the continuation.
    31
  1142.  @calinyx  Which part of our vast country of China did you visit?
    31
  1143.  @truenorthstrongandfree3699  About the Social Credit System, many foreigners often complain Chinese people spit in public, smoke in non-smoking areas, jump queues, disobey traffic rules, jay walk, drive on wrong side of the road, speed through red lights, etc when not all Chinese people are like that. We Chinese feel embarrassed that such bad people represent China overseas, so the government introduce social credit system to discourage such bad behaviour and promote better behaviour instead. This is a meritocratic system where good behaviour is rewarded and bad behaviour penalised. But if such people persist with bad behaviour, until their scores fall to become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisances of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again.
    31
  1144. According UNESCO Word Heritage, China ranks top in the world in number of UNESCO world heritage sites at 55 sites along with Italy.
    31
  1145. Brahmos is only supersonic missile, whereas China already has hypersonic missile (DF-ZF) that's been tested seven times successfully.
    31
  1146. There are many translation apps/devices available or in development by other companies, but it appears this one by Timekettle is among the most accurate.
    31
  1147.  @ubongfriday8662  Hambantota port had racked up much debt repaying Western loans, that's why China offered a deal to lease the port to Chinese companies to develop for 99 years. Once the 99 years are over, Hambantota port would be returned to Sri Lanka, so Sri Lanka actually stands to benefit in the long term over this deal.
    31
  1148.  @rpg1663  Isn't it better this way? Wouldn't want a person with an unknown ID on board the high speed trains.
    31
  1149. "Those tiny cars don't look like they could withstand that sort of impact." Then what about motorcycles (which are legal on the road in most of the world) offering zero protection against car crashes? At least this small electric car still offers some protection, compared to motorbikes and electric scooters
    31
  1150.  @ColoniaMurder20  Another point to note: Taiwan was part of Qing Dynasty China at the very least (look up Map of Qing). And after the Manchus conquered China, they got rid of the belief of a "Han-only China," and redefined China as a multi-ethnic state. "After conquering "China proper", the Manchus identified their state as "China" (中國, Zhōngguó; "Middle Kingdom"), and referred to it as Dulimbai Gurun in Manchu (Dulimbai means "central" or "middle," gurun means "nation" or "state"). The emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, Tibet and other areas) as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that "China" only meant Han areas." ... (Source: Wikipedia: Qing Dynasty)
    31
  1151. The Philippines intentionally grounded a vessel (the Sierra Madre) onto the Second Thomas Shoal. China had offered to repair the grounded vessel and get it back into the ocean, but Philippines refused China's aid. In 1999, Philippine president Joseph Estrada promised that the vessel would be towed away. In 2014, the Chinese government asked the Philippines to remove the grounded ship. In 2017, China and the Philippines established a gentlemen's agreement that the status quo be maintained for the South China Sea. Under the status quo agreement, no construction materials are allowed to fortify the Sierra Madre. However, the Philippines violated the agreement and started sending construction materials to repair the rusting vessel.
    31
  1152. Likewise, Chinese enjoy the lifestyle, culture, system of government etc that we see currently enjoying.
    31
  1153. Malcom X had spoken admiringly of Mao's global leadership at a rally in Harlem in November 1964, saying that it took a strong China to give a Chinese person respect, so the same respect will come to Africans with a strong Africa.
    31
  1154. The transition to a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices from a uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (that of U.S and its allies) cannot be complete without the adoption of an alternative to the U.S dollar.
    31
  1155.  @9thebear  Life for Tibetans was harsh under the previous Dalai Lama rule. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, and 95% of the Tibetan population were serfs who had to struggle to grow food. Starvation was commonplace, and theft of food was punished by amputation and education was restricted to the elites. Today, Tibetans have roads, streetlights, running water, gas and electricity, telephone cables, WiFi, and modern technology like cars, computers, mobile phones, etc. Hydroelectric dams were built to provide Tibetans with clean, renewable energy. The world's highest elevation railway was built, connecting Lhasa to Qinghai, so now the Tibetans can import food from the rest of the mainland. The first Tibetan colleges were opened in Lhasa to educate the Tibetan populace.
    31
  1156. It's ironic that US will always support Israel till the end. Because before Oct7, the US had said a similar thing about supporting Ukraine till the end.
    31
  1157. Precisely. Yet people keep telling me that they have "freedom of speech" on the Western Internet.
    31
  1158.  @jamilbrugsen1362  Did you know that one of the most popular Chinese actress today is of Uighur descent? Her name is Dilraba Dilmurat (aka Dilireba 迪丽热巴) and she's been featured in many popular Chinese dramas. In 2021, as a Uighur from Xinjiang, she publicly voiced her support for cotton produced in Xinjiang.
    31
  1159.  @crestfire8008  Indeed. Being a former British colony, many Indians tend to have colonial mentality, worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture while viewing other "non-white" cultures as inferior. The border tensions between China and India today can be traced back to colonial Britain's actions.
    31
  1160. Where China sees win-win cooperation and mutual gain, the U.S sees a zero sum game.
    31
  1161. It's a combination of the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (phobia of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, that the notion of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually overtaking the U.S someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    31
  1162. Well said. It's like how the U.S banned Google's Android OS from Huawei's products, which resulted in Huawei developing its own operating system, called HarmonyOS. The same thing is probably going to happen with chips.
    31
  1163.  @Zarozian  serpentza grew up in South Africa, so he was accustomed to the apartheid system, and when he move to China, he enjoyed Chinese people hospitality. However, China has changed and he no longer enjoys the privileges he once held, which was probably the reason why he eventually left.
    31
  1164. Agreed. Foreign affairs should begin at home. The US should get its home affairs in order first, before dealing with foreign agencies.
    31
  1165.  @John2r1  How is Taiwan culturally different from the rest of China? The people of Taiwan are Chinese and use Chinese characters. Even their own constitution says that the island is part of China.
    31
  1166. Additionally, the constitution of the Republic of China also recognizes Taiwan as an inseparable part of China.
    31
  1167. I miss the old weekly show where you, Daniel Dumbrill, Jayoe Nation and others would just simply talk about China.
    31
  1168. Russia and China are facilitating the global transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, rather than the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and its "allies")
    31
  1169. Blinken claiming that Russia has the "2nd most powerful military in Ukraine" has turned out to be wrong. As usual.
    31
  1170. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking ahead by 1 move. Russia is playing Chess, thinking ahead by 5 moves. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋) thinking ahead by 10 moves.
    31
  1171.  @PeterLamin-bw5rs  Netanyahu even quoted biblical refences to the Amalekites, and that's how he labels them as sub-human.
    31
  1172. Many Chinese tend towards optimistic views and look forward to a bright future ahead. It's a shame that many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    31
  1173. China feeds 21% of the world's population using only 7% arable land of the world, and still having surplus food to export to other countries.
    30
  1174. +Robert Hardy The DDP wasn't in power at all, KMT still ruled Taiwan from 2000-2008. And yes, Taiwan progressed rapidly under Imperial Japanese dictatorship for 50 years! This adds to my point that benevolent dictatorships can help a country progress far better than democracy.
    30
  1175. In fact, the world's oldest decimal multiplication tables were written on bamboo slips dating back to to about 305 BC, during China's Warring States period and were known as the Tsinghua Bamboo Slips (清华简)
    30
  1176. +Jahmil Manimtim The Philippines coastguard shot to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shi Cheng 洪石成 yet you still claim Chinese coastguard bullying Philippines? Which Philippines fisherman has been shot by Chinese coastguard? None!
    30
  1177. Chinese people make products like smartphones, computers, appliances, electronics, clothing, sneakers, etc cheaply so inflation in other countries is kept to minimum, and the cost of living is lower than it should be. Think of the millions of dollars people in other countries have saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other things like cars, houses, getting married or school fees, college fees, doctors fees, etc.
    30
  1178. Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway ... Source: YouTube: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, compared to what Westerners have been doing in Africa for centuries.
    30
  1179. Singapore is the only South East Asian/ASEAN country to have imposed sanctions on Russia, even though it doesn't offer any benefit for Singapore to do so. As a result, Singapore is added to Russia's list of "unfriendly countries" so isn't Singapore playing right into the U.S hands here?
    30
  1180.  @catmandu6776  Can't I be proud that Beijing is the first in Olympic history to successfully host both the Summer Olympics (in 2008) and the Winter Olympics (in 2022) as well as to repurpose constructed Olympic facilities instead of letting it just fall into disuse, as in the case of many other cities that previously hosted the Olympics? If it's a good thing, then why can't I bring it up?
    30
  1181.  @chrishamlin5863  Because China has a huge student population, such that competition for top schools and higher education in China is extremely fierce and intense. Some Chinese students are unable to qualify for local universities, so they elect to study abroad (especially if their parents have the money).
    30
  1182.  @osodowilberforce2321  Then looks like you've got a serious case of sinophobia.
    30
  1183.  @chrisbell238  The USA did not give access to tech willingly, it was only achieved because of CPC policy of making technology transfer as a requirement for foreign companies wanting to set up shop in China. If not for this policy, the USA wouldn't have parted with their tech.
    30
  1184.  @specialcookday  Free Julian Assange! Free Palestine!
    30
  1185.  Pain Zer0  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, back when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territories into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during the Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty and Qing Dynasty and Tibet is clearly part of China's history, as well as a part of People's Republic of China today. Why then, should China give up our ancestral lands?
    30
  1186.  @MarkYeung1  "Finland and Sweden had different ideas. It is a multipolar world" Finland and Sweden joining NATO is only reinforcing the unipolar world, dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US). Whereas countries joining BRICS are reinforcing the multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices.
    30
  1187. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. On the other hand, many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a bleak outlook of the future.
    30
  1188. It's ironic that Cyrus claims US will always support Israel till the end. Because before Oct 7, the US said a similar thing about supporting Ukraine till the end.
    30
  1189. During the Republic of China 🇹🇼 era (1912-1949), China was dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country suffering from famine, invasions and civil strife. It was Mao Zedong and the Communists that succeeded in reunifying a divided China under communism and founded People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949, when the previous administration failed to achieve for 37 years.
    30
  1190.  @richardallison8745  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    30
  1191. Google left China because they lost the majority market share to rival Chinese company Baidu. While Google's market share climbed from 15% in mid-2006 to 31% in 2010, Baidu's shared increased its market share from 47% in mid-2006 to 64% in 2010, which is a significant lead. Because Baidu was introducing more innovative features than Google.
    30
  1192.  @Thomas.3698  Far better than putting your trust in 'Murica. Look at where that got South Vietnam, Afghanistan and now Ukraine.
    30
  1193.  @ankurantil6137  You said: "Tibbet 's mount Kailash has been part of India." The truth is that Mount of Kailash and Lake Mansarovar were never a part of India. In the past few centuries too, it was never a part of any major Indian empire. Kailash was part of Nepal a long time back and was ruled by a Nepali King. It was the Nepali king who gifted the Kailash area to a Tibetan King as dowry for his daughter’s marriage and then it became a part of Tibet. ... (Source: Trip To Temples)
    30
  1194.  @jamilbrugsen1362  What did my nation do that's so appalling to you? The population of Uighurs has grown over the decades according to population census. Uighurs in Xinjiang celebrate festivals by dressing up in traditional Uighur clothing (i.e chapan and doppa) eating Uighur cuisine (i.e Uighur flatbread and kebabs) and by singing and dancing as well as playing traditional Uighur instruments.
    30
  1195.  @jamilbrugsen1362  Please explain what has been done to Uighurs. Online there are many videos of Uighurs in Xinjiang celebrating Uighur culture, yet you're claiming China has done something appalling to them?
    30
  1196.  @Darkademic  "Italy is the successor to the Roman Empire to the same extent that China today is the successor to any of the many Chinese dynasties" Most would disagree with it. Take written script for example and Chinese characters comprise the only writing system continuously used since its invention in 1200 BC. Whereas today Latin is considered a dead language (much like Sumerian Cuneiform) since it's no longer evolving with the times, whereas Chinese characters are still widely used today and evolving with new characters being adopted.
    30
  1197. Fantastic to see you on George Galloway's Mother of All Talkshows.
    30
  1198. Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out stems from perceived U.S military support. But it's axiomatic that U.S is in decline and China is rising. As long as peace prevails, the U.S will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge mainland China's rise, by which then Taiwan's backing would evaporate, and reunification would be inevitable.
    30
  1199. Food might start to be priced in an alternative currency to the dollar, much like Saudi Arabian oil might get priced the same way.
    30
  1200. If you watch the Chinese animated movie Big Fish & Begonia 大鱼海棠 the house that the villagers live in are inspired from these communal houses.
    30
  1201. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners (not all) are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    30
  1202.  @newfaith912  Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists. China is the world's largest source of tourists, are you sure you've never met any Chinese people? Or how about Chinese international students, since China is also the world's largest source of international students? Chinese make up almost 20% of the world's population after all, are you sure you've never met a Chinese?
    30
  1203.  @MrBAchompBAchomp  You said: "What about the videos of people being barricaded in their apartments during COVID. Welding door hinges closed." Turns out that those people had tested positive and were told to remain quarantined (while food and other necessities could be delivered to their door). However, some of those people still went outside repeated, and the frustrated mayor decided to weld the doors shut (even though the windows were left open).
    30
  1204. They would have to dismantle the military-industrial complex first, to put an end to the unlimited wars.
    30
  1205.  @MarkYeung1  China holds around a trillion dollars worth of US debt.
    30
  1206.  @HermanWillems  Under Mao Zedong, China's population nearly doubled from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Isn't that why China has become one of the world's most populous countries?
    30
  1207. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners (not all) tend to be pessimistic and have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    30
  1208. U.S decoupling from China is impossible. Our world economies and supply lines are too intricately connected for the U.S to extricate themselves from.
    30
  1209.  @Frog1652  "神州 Shenzhou it's called a naval blockade." Naval blockades won't stop Russia from delivering gas to China through overland pipelines like the Power of Siberia. And U.S allies like Saudi Arabia won't be able to sell oil to China during this supposed naval blockade, you think the Saudi Arabia will be happy with that? You're only going to push Saudi Arabia closer towards China in the process.
    30
  1210. China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    30
  1211.  @padraicley3265  "How about this one: Russia Putin was a bad ex-husband, often beat up his wives." You're talking about Russia Putin which means post-Soviet dissolution right? Putin's presidency was inaugurated in the Kremlin on 7 May 2012, so which "ex-wife" was beaten up post 2012? "Took money from the mobs, killing some of his friends (LGBT) who doesn't share his view." In 2020, Russia's estimated level of national debt reached about 20% of the GDP, ranking 14th of the countries with the lowest national debt, what borrowed money from the mobs are you talking about? On the other hand, Ukraine had accumulated debts with the EU. And the village bully (USA) and his harem of wives (NATO countries) have a habit of slapping sanctions against anyone that disagreed with their views. "Cyber attack other people for his own gains." Do you actually have proof of this? Did you know that "Russia gate" is a hoax conceived by the Democrats to smear Trump for being too friendly with the Russians? "Rig his standing in the community." Putin enjoys immense support from the people of Russia, and the quality of the life of Russians had grown under his leadership before 2022. "The Ex-wife is about had his ego and im-moral life style and join the another group of friends who has more opportunities for a better life." Again, the EU did not offer good deals to Ukraine, which was why Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych didn't want to side with the EU and was subsequently ousted in a coup d'etat in 2014 by the USA. And for all their talk of allowing Ukraine to join, NATO countries did not want admit Ukraine as a member (due to Ukraine's corruption issues) and even till today, NATO is not going to send troops to defend Ukraine, so what "opportunities for a better life" are you talking about? "The Ex-husband is getting angry the ex-wife is doing better than he ever can and decide to ruin her." How is Ukraine doing better than Russia ever can? In 2021 Russia's GDP ($1709 billion) is literally 10 times that of Ukraine's GDP ($164 billion) so on what basis are you claiming Ukraine is doing better than Russia? You're analogy doesn't seem to take into details the deep historical roots that Ukraine has with Russia.
    30
  1212.  @MarkYeung1  "Just ask the people of Shanghai." Most of the people in Shanghai actually accept the fact that the lockdowns are necessary to combat the virus.
    30
  1213.  @dregga7638  China seeks win-win cooperation, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    29
  1214. Meanwhile, India has won zero gold medals, despite having a similar population size as China's.
    29
  1215. China is able to plan long term with 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans China's leaders can remain in power long-term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. Whereas US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only make short-term plans for USA, instead of long-term plans spanning say 10 years or more.
    29
  1216. China don't want the world's number one spot like USA. It is a taxing, tiring and thankless position. Beijing believes in global governance and sharing rulership of the world, whereas Washington believes in maintaining its global hegemony.
    29
  1217.  @elanor2123  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    29
  1218.  @itsthatsem  Glad to know that there are thinking Singaporeans like you who can look beyond and at the bigger picture.
    29
  1219. ​ @maddog3768  Talk about land grabbing, the U.S literally stole an entire continent from Native Americans and are occupying those lands even till today.
    29
  1220. Modern China was built by sweat, blood, tears and sacrifice of Chinese people through wars, famine, civil unrest, rebellions and revolutions, to turn China from dirt poor, starving country, into an economic juggernaut, with a strong military and a global player of international politics. All in just a single generation.
    29
  1221. Isn't Oliver acting as the "British Man on amphetamines telling you which were the good ones and which were the bad?"
    29
  1222. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, the U.S appears to be a threat to global peace and stability.
    29
  1223. @cabanacaterer Have you visited Xinjiang and seen what life is like there for yourself? There are videos of people who visited, and the Uighurs can be seen dressed in traditional Uighur clothing, eating Uighur cuisine (such as naan (Uighur flatbread) and mutton kebabs), singing and dancing, playing Uighur musical instruments (Dutar and drums) and so on.
    29
  1224. In Western culture, wearing a mask can be perceived as being rude, like you're trying to protect yourself from catching other people's germs. In Asian culture, wearing a mask is perceived as being polite, like you're trying to protect others from catching your disease. This could be one reason why wafer fabrication factories were built in Asia where mask-wearing isn't so frowned upon.
    29
  1225. Ukraine was once the center of media attention, but after Oct 7 2023, that focus has shifted to Palestine. Hopefully the people of Taiwan are taking notes not to follow in Ukraine's footsteps.
    29
  1226.  @Andy-P  You said: "How does that work with the Phillipines..." Didn't you know what the Americans did to the Philippines in the past? The Americans had initially promised to grant the Philippines independence from Spain, as long as the Filipino supported America against the Spanish. But after the American-Spanish war, the Americans broke their promise and claimed the Philippines for themselves. The Filipinos fought back, but they eventually lost the American-Philippine War (which resulted in the deaths of some 200,000 Filipinos) In the end, the Philippines became an American colony.
    29
  1227. They are also vetoing any attempt for a ceasefire
    29
  1228.  @andersenchang9524  Exactly. Here's American passers-by on the street being asked: "Can You Name a Country? Any Country?" youtu.be/kRh1zXFKC_o
    29
  1229. There's a Chinese proverb: "Traveling thousands of miles is better than reading thousands of books." (读万卷书，不如行万里路)
    29
  1230. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like USA is a threat to global peace and stability.
    29
  1231. China's approach is to save lives at the expense of businesses. Loss of income is regrettable yes, but money loss can be earned back in the future. But once elderly people lose their lives, no amount of money can buy back those lives that have been lost.
    29
  1232.  @fabricefils-aime7142  In the long term, China will most likely develop equivalents of our own. For example, when Google banned Android OS on Huawei's phone, Huawei came up with its own operating system, HarmonyOS.
    29
  1233. Rule No. 1: Don't March on Moscow. Rule No. 2: Don't Bluff Beijing.
    29
  1234.  @johnheaton5058  You said: "The right Path?? With Xi as emperor?" Throughout it's long history, China has always been governed by a strong central government. The ancient Chinese Emperor sat in his throne, surrounded by ministers and courtiers, and that was how China have been governed for thousands of years. Since this form of political system has served Chinese faithfully for millennia, then can't China continue to pursue this form of governance? Not every country has to adopt Western-style democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    29
  1235. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi "围棋"), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    29
  1236.  Meng WAZOO CRIMINAL  Russia has captured territory equivalent to the size of England in Ukraine, yet you doubt the Russian army exists? Then what is NATO fighting against? The Ghost of Kiev?
    29
  1237. momololo Fortunes shift and flow with the times. And there is no such thing as a finish line. China may lagged behind Japan but has already caught up and even surpassed Japan in certain fields. For example, China's high speed rail network is the world's largest, beating even Japan's Shinkasen railway. Japan's economy is currently in a slump, whereas China is world's 2nd economy today. Who can rightfully say that the finishing line has been reached yet?
    29
  1238.  @jonathanhe7676  But according to Taiwan's constitution, they still claim all of mainland China as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. So if Taiwan can claim the mainland, then can't the mainland claim Taiwan as well?
    29
  1239. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice, namely that of the US and its "allies."
    29
  1240. China Uncensored never says anything that would put China in a positive light to its viewers.
    29
  1241.  @tomchen513  Destroyer? China has built infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, etc in other developing countries, while the U.S is destroying infrastructure like Nord Stream pipeline.
    29
  1242.  @chrisbell238  How is India the new China? Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: MBA Skool: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 But where are the famous companies from India as compared to China?
    29
  1243. China actually offered to extend the "One-China, Two Systems" policy to include Taiwan, so that the mainland can keep our government and Taiwan can keep theirs, but both are considered a unified China. Its as though North Korea and South Korea agree to unify as a single Korea, but both parties can keep their own respective governments. But Taiwan has declined this offer and not offered a counter proposal of its own.
    29
  1244. Russia's adult literacy rate is 99%. China's adult literacy rate is 99%. United States' adult literacy rate is 79%.
    29
  1245.  @tvl6347  Indeed. But due to growing anti-China sentiment, many ethnic Chinese STEM graduates in the US are considering returning to China.
    29
  1246. I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, and I was appalled at how many Westerners (but not all) have a negative perception of China. Even after I bring up China's achievements, some Westerners (not all) just laugh at me, called me brain wash or tell me to "Go Back to China!", even though many of them never actually set foot in China themselves.
    29
  1247.  @ricardoxavier827  Russia is an European country, why not welcome Russia on board Nato and EU? At one point, Putin even expressed interest in Russia joining Nato, yet Russia's application was rejected. Had Russia been allowed to join Nato, then it's quite possible Ukraine won't be in this situation today.
    29
  1248.  @tooltalk  China was never a British colony. Hong Kong was a British colony up until 1997, but mainland China never was.
    29
  1249.  @MH-il1lk  Taiwan island inalienable part of China.
    29
  1250. The world needs more diplomats like China's Wang Yi and Russia's Sergey Lavrov, rather than American "diplomats" (if they can be called such) like Anthony Blinken, John Kirby and Jake Sullivan.
    29
  1251. Mongolia has lots of history between Russia and China, both good and bad. It is highly likely that they want remain neutral toward either of our countries.
    29
  1252.  @Matt-li6gn  Agreed. Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out depends on (perceived) US support for its cause. But as time passes, the US will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer challenge mainland China's rise, by which then their support for Taiwan evaporates and reunification becomes the only option.
    29
  1253.  @man-kitli1572  I'm just using an analogy to better explain the Russo-Ukraine crisis through a family drama. There's another shorter analogy trending on Weibo: Before I went to sleep, my wife was complaining to me: "This Russia is such a bad country, if Ukraine wants to join NATO, it is their business and freedom, Russia has no right to intervene. This is just an excuse for Russia to invade Ukraine." I said nothing, got out of bed and went to the kitchen, before returning to bed with knife in my hand. I told my wife: "Let's go to sleep" Upon seeing the knife, my wife sat up abruptly and looked at me with wide eyes. "What are you doing? Sleeping with a knife?!" she exclaimed. I replied: "Don’t worry about it, let’s go to sleep. Besides, me sleeping with a knife is none of your business and it is my freedom." My wife said: "You're crazy! How can I sleep when you are lying next to me with a knife? What if you accidentally cut me?" I replied: “Well, you don’t even trust your own husband, how can you expect Russia to trust Ukraine? Sleeping with a knife is like Ukraine joining the NATO."
    29
  1254.  @philipgumm9243  45 degrees? Then you'll see things slanted at an angle, of course everything looks different. What are you talking about?
    29
  1255.  @MarkYeung1  "the war is between Ukraine and Russia" More like the conflict is a proxy war between Russia and USA using Ukraine.
    28
  1256. Wali was probably under the impression that the war began just over a month ago, when in fact it had been ongoing in Donbas for 8 years prior.
    28
  1257.  @CdschW2  It doesn't have to be that way. Russia and China found success through following different paths, now they are also enabling countries in the Global South to do the same.
    28
  1258.  @bobmorane4926  I think the best way to understand it is that local governments (i.e Shanghai, Wuhan, etc) are primarily responsible for their own province, whereas the central government is responsible for all of China and the big picture. If a city's government is unable to curb the local cases and prevent them from spreading, that usually signals when the central government starts stepping in and taking over reins.
    28
  1259.  @michaelkatz275  President Putin enjoys massive support from around 70-80% of Russians taken from recent surveys in Russia. In contrast, President Biden's approval ratings have taken a plunge with only around 40% of Americans approving of him.
    28
  1260. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiment in the West towards Russia and China respectively. And it's having the effect of actually pushing both countries closer together possibly than we've ever been in history.
    28
  1261.  @sew_gal7340  The irony was that during the Vietnam War, the Americans dropped nalpam bombs on Vietnamese villages. The U.S sprayed chemical defoliants that cause birth defects in Vietnamese kids even till today, and also planted many landmines in Vietnam before pulling out of Saigon and leaving the South Vietnamese to their fate. Yet the colonial mentality continues to make the average Vietnamese continue to adore the USA.
    28
  1262.  @YuuSHiiiN  In his mind, Lindsey doesn't really see Russians as humans that's why.
    28
  1263. It's a combination of the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (phobia of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, that the notion of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually overtaking the U.S someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    28
  1264.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "China’s government imposed tariffs of 116–218% on bottled Australian wine imports through 2026." That's tariffs NOT sanctions. You can still buy Australian wine in China, so why'd you claim China sanctioned Australian wine? Do you even know the meaning of sanctions before using the word itself?
    28
  1265.  @bungkusi2432  Some Asians (but not all) suffer from s "colonial mentality" where they worship Anglo-Saxon culture, while harboring disdain for any "non-white" culture (sometimes including their own). This mentality is predominant in many former colonies where not only was the land colonized, but the minds of the people as well. Even after decolonization, the "decolonization of the mind" is still an ongoing process to heal the damage that colonizers inflicted on the minds of the colonized.
    28
  1266. ​ @d9918  Huawei has come up with its own version of Google's Play Store.
    28
  1267. In China, its very common for people to ride bicycles and even electric scooters (China has world's largest electric scooter sales) Scooters travel at nearly the same speed (as this electric car) and offer zero protection, so isn't this electric car better than the scooter?
    28
  1268.  @brujita788  Water too. I've seen footage of Palestinians digging wells for underground water. The water is oftentimes unsanitary too.
    28
  1269. Reminds me of the quote of how ballpoint pens didn't work in zero gravity, so NASA spent a decade and millions of dollars developing a pen that writes in zero gravity for its astronauts. Faced with a similar problem, the Russians used a pencil.
    28
  1270.  FREEHONGKONG-yn5ij  Decoupling is impossible, even Western diplomats avoid using the term.
    28
  1271. BYD's success is drawing the attention (and jealousy) of rival companies, and I'm afraid it's only a matter of time that what's happening to TikTok now is going to happen to BYD.
    28
  1272.  @jamilbrugsen1362  Where did you get your figures from? You're just claiming that 30 million are missing without stating your sources?
    28
  1273. Research has shown that Asians (including Chinese, Indians, Japanese, Koreans, SE Asians) are among the most intelligent and diligent peoples. Westerners tend to stereotype Asians as smart, hardworking, good at math, sciences, engineering, computing, etc. Stereotypical Asian professions include doctors, lawyer, engineer, computer programmer, and even the lowly professions tend towards being hardworking, like chefs, waiters, telemarketers, salesmen, etc. Its just stereotype I know, but there must be some truth to the stereotypes. Today, China and India are the two most populous countries in the world, so statistically speaking, we should have the most brainpower and manpower of the world. Statistically, a larger population means higher percentage of "geniuses" to make plans for the future, and also a larger labor force to implement said plans. We just need to learn how to tap into our populations.
    28
  1274.  @canhaktan9674  Crimes against humanity? China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing into developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Sudan, Chad, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, etc, even in the 21st century. The United States is bombing those countries, destroying lives and property, leaving families broken, homeless, jobless, and harboring animosity against the US government. The Iraq Body Count Project reported some 183,669 – 206,273 civilian deaths. That's why many angry people flock to join the terrorist's cause, and just when you eradicate a terrorist cell, another one seemingly pops out of nowhere to take over the terrorist' cause.
    28
  1275.  @chrishamlin5863  Building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, etc, requires a level of expertise that many BRI countries lack. Chinese engineers, architects and builders are arguably the world's best when it comes to building infrastructure, so what's wrong when those BRI jobs go to Chinese contractors employing Chinese workers?
    28
  1276.  @brandonmoreland4392  Because China and Russia are facilitating the transition towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, from the current uni-polar world dominated by a single voice, namely the U.S's and it's "allies."
    28
  1277.  @dianasong4594  The 50 cents term is often used against people who say positive things about China, but if China is successful then can't people be allowed to talk about its achievements?
    28
  1278. The "Death Star" from Star Wars comes to mind.
    28
  1279. Yes, she was arrested in 2018 and its already 2020, yet Meng's trial hasn't even been concluded. 2 years! Why so long? USA needs time to fabricate false evidence against Meng?
    28
  1280.  @mandarinandthetenrings2201  You said: "America is oil independent it doesn't need oil from Saudi Arabia." Then why did Joe Biden visit the Saudi Arabian prince (MBS) to get Saudi Arabia to increase oil production, if the U.S is oil independent?
    28
  1281. The "colonial mentality" is difficult to eradicate. Since the 19th century, many have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the thought of a non-Western country like China eventually surpassing the U.S someday in the foreseeable future, is simply to frightening to many to fathom.
    28
  1282.  @calinyx  After Pan Zhanle won, why'd many Western swimmers face turned angry purple 👿
    28
  1283.  @armathanya8000  Many Filipinos (but not all) tend to have the Colonial Mentality, and continue to worship white culture while harboring disdain for any non-white culture (including their own).
    28
  1284.  @Soraviel  It's a like a boxing match between U.S and China, only that the U.S is busy punching itself in the face, while China is busy training and doing push-ups to get stronger.
    28
  1285. NATO was formed in response to rising Soviet military might, but since the USSR has dissolved in 1991, NATO no longer serves any interests, except the U.S hegemonic interests.
    28
  1286. It's true that Lee Kuan Yew ruled Singapore with a firm hand and tolerated little dissent from political rivals. But under his leadership, Singapore transformed from small fishing village nation into a world-class nation. Many Singaporeans paid tribute at LKY's funeral, despite his reputation as a dictator in the West.
    28
  1287. China is already the world's largest producer of renewable green energy and is moving closer towards reducing fossil fuel consumption in favor of green energy. But US President Trump is planing to bring back coal power plants to USA, and he even opted America out of the 2017 Paris Climate Agreement, so that USA isn't bound by a CO2 emission limit.
    28
  1288. Agreed. While Thailand wasn't colonized, the people of the neighboring countries may still suffer from the lingering "colonial mentality" that plagues many former colonies. Although many countries have since physically decolonized, the "decolonization of the mind" is still ongoing among the people.
    28
  1289.  @calinyx  "Youtube gives you FREEDOM to have a discussion and have disagreements, on any topic." Censorship clearly exists on YouTube, what makes you claim YouTube has the freedoms you've described?
    28
  1290. China has made 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, to chart China's course in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing term limits, our leaders can remain in power long-term to see these plans bloom and come to fruition in the future. Whereas US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years so they can't make long-term plans spanning say 10 years or more for America's future.
    28
  1291. He was an actor that played a role in a show that's all. Now that show is over and another show has appeared in Israel-Palestine.
    28
  1292.  @vietnguyen4312  You said: "Why are you making a video about the Australia/Solomon Island relationship???? You are simply sounding like a CCP spokesmen and have also twisted various points." Since Cyrus' video is about Australia/Solomon Island relationship, how does that make him sound like a CPC spokesperson? Just because he makes a video about relations between those two countries? "The pacific has been a peaceful region since WW2 so why are the CCP so eager to build a port that has the ability for war ships to refuel?" That hypothetical port could also be used to refuel civilian ships, could that be the original purpose? Why are you so quick to judge China, a country that only has a handful of overseas bases, as a threat to peace, when the U.S has over 400+ overseas military bases in places like Japan, South Korea, Philippines, etc?
    28
  1293. It's a combination of the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (phobia of the West being overrun with Asians) that's fueling Sinophobia in the West today.
    28
  1294. Just look at the difference in adult literacy rates between U.S and China. China's adult literacy rate is 99%. U.S adult literacy rate is 79%.
    28
  1295.  @windvlaag4404  Perhaps you could recount your experience with those Chinese tourists in your country
    28
  1296. ​ @ben10094 Homeownership rate in China exceeds 90%. Also, more than 20% of people in China own multiple homes. Homeownership rate in the US is 65%.
    28
  1297. Cyrus, if you understood Confucian virtues, then Chinese value the elderly in society, that's why China prioritize keeping elderly folk safe, even if at the cost to the economy. Loss of money and income is tragic yes, but people can always make money later after the bad period passes. But once elderly people lost their lives, then no amount of money can buy back lives once they are gone.
    28
  1298.  @michaelkatz275  China literally has one of the highest rates of homeownership (>80% of all urban households) and multiple/second home ownership (>20%) in the world.
    28
  1299. The USA has a well-established, gas-guzzling, fast-lane, automobile culture which makes it difficult for a small, slow, electric car like this to become popular there. Different culture, different mindset, different market.
    28
  1300. 1. Abe’s maternal grandfather was a Class A war criminal. 2. He insisted in going to Yasakuni Shrine that interned the ashes of all of these class A war criminals even when the Japanese Emperor Hirohito refused to. 3. He pushed for the amendment of the Japanese constitution regarding it’s pacifist clause. 4. He was the one that came up with the Quad. 5. Abenomics has failed and that is why Japan’s debt is 230% of GDP and the yen is in a free fall since March.
    28
  1301.  @abel2933  Truth be told, Moscow has also been marched upon many times in the past. By Napoleon and Hitler.
    28
  1302. Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. But its already 2019, and China's economy is still going strong at over 6% growth, so isn't it clear Western propaganda been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years?
    28
  1303. Many travelers find that returning to their home country from China is like "traveling back in time."
    28
  1304.  @4x4r974  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China, and incorporated those territories into the Yuan Dynasty China. Centuries later, the Manchu conquerors did the same and made Tibet part of Qing Dynasty China. Tibet broke free of China briefly in 1912, but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1952. Today, Tibet is recognized all over the world as a part of the People's Republic of China. When you draw the Map of China, Tibet is part of it.
    28
  1305. I am Chinese and I say "Jai Hind!"
    28
  1306.  @derylhenriquez2962  Have you actually talked to the Uighurs and Tibetans in China? Their population has increased fourfold over the decades, and they enjoy priveleges and benefits that Han do not. For example, when applying for a university course, ethnic minorities like Uighurs and Tibetans have an easier time qualifying for university courses, compared to Han.
    28
  1307. Industrialization is a long and slow process. China took at least 4 decades to industrialize and build its supply chains. Trump wants to achieve that in America in just 4 years!
    28
  1308. Taiwanese work culture shares more similarities with mainland Chinese work culture than American work culture. The island is a part of China after all.
    28
  1309. Agreed. Just like President Putin daring to go against American hegemony. Great leaders share similar beliefs.
    27
  1310. America only has one major smartphone brand, Apple, so there's hardly any competition. China has many smartphone brands like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, so there's plenty of competition.
    27
  1311.  @deschan2246  China actually pay attention and listen to the concerns of smaller countries (i.e climate change, economic issues, etc) and formulate win-win deals. Whereas the U.S don't really listen to the smaller countries, as long as they can use them as pawns to maintain its global hegemonic interests.
    27
  1312.  @ztsu8542  Agreed that both China and Singapore support a peaceful resolution to end the conflict in Ukraine. But Singapore is the only ASEAN country to have slapped sanctions on Russia, thus earning Singapore a place on Russia's list of "unfriendly countries", so isn't Singapore playing into the U.S hands here?
    27
  1313. China's Covid-19 policy is to save lives (even elderly lives) at the expense of businesses. Whereas U.S Covid-19 policy is to save businesses at the expense of lives.
    27
  1314. Agreed. Even Taiwan island was also previously ruled by the authoritarian Kuomintang (White Terror Period), and yet Taiwan's economy admittedly flourished under single-party KMT leadership and was one of the Four Asian Tigers. Today, the island's economy is stagnating after Western style democracy was introduced.
    27
  1315. Agreed. China has prepared 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans to map out China's direction and future in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. Because the communist party is expected to remain in power for the long-term, they'll be able to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the years to come. Whereas the U.S President have to step down after 4-8 years max, because of term limits, so their presidents are only able to plan short-term, instead of making long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more for America's future.
    27
  1316.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou check your reliable news source, stay away from Eastern MSN like people's daily and CGTN." Check your source, China imported $1011 million of Australian wine in 2020, so who said China sanctioned Australian wine? China imported $412 million of Australian lobsters in 2019-20, so who said China sanctioned Australian lobster?
    27
  1317. Biden: "We will defend Ukraine until the very end!" After the event on Oct 7... Biden: "We will defend Ukraine for as long as we can!" ... (Hopefully the people of Taiwan are taking notes.)
    27
  1318. Exactly. China has many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 30-year plans that are discussed every Two Sessions meeting between the NPC and the CPPCC.
    27
  1319. Countries like Cuba, Venezuela, etc have become vulnerable to military coups, despite not borrowing any money from the U.S
    27
  1320.  @aribethdetylmarande8228  said "What I stated is that if the government (not necessary to be CCP, can be any party) made a decision to adjust China economic system into Capitalism, China will grow and develop." That's not what you said, you said "Since China had never been ruled by other party, how do you know that China cannot gain similar economic achievement under leadership of a different government?" as I quoted previously. Yet you are accusing me of twisting concepts? When did you ever mentioned capitalism at all? You had proclaimed that China had never been ruled by other party that's all. Also, during the KMT administration of China, Republic of China was capitalist too but after the fall of the Qing Dynasty in 1912, China underwent a period of instability and disrupted economic activity. The KMT seized control of private banks in 1936 and replaced the China's currency by stamping out the earlier silver and gold-backed notes that had made up China's currency previously. However, this led to hyperinflation, as the KMT began printing notes en masse. Initially, a total of 1.4 billion Chinese yuan was issued in 1936, but by the end of the 2nd Sino-Japanese war some 1.031 trillion in notes was issued) So how did China experience growth and development under KMT? And you know why the USA abandoned KMT during the Chinese Civil War? Because KMT was corrupt, and pocketed some 750 million dollars worth of US military aid, until even the US president Harry Truman wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves."
    27
  1321.  @MarkYeung1  China came up with a peace plan for Ukraine, but the US just dismiss it and accuse China of (potentially) sending weapons to Russia so who is the real war monger here?
    27
  1322. On a separate note, President Xi talking to Zelenskyy over the phone shows that China is committed to finding a peaceful resolution to the Ukraine conflict. Unlike those countries that continue to send military equipment to Ukraine.
    27
  1323.  @wyliamulayye7534  That jamilbrugsen guy has so much to say about the Uighurs in China, but it seems he has no opinion on how the Muslims in Gaza and West Bank are being treated.
    27
  1324. Because Ukraine is a "laundry machine"
    27
  1325. Beijing is now the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both the Summer Olympics (Beijing 2008) and the Winter Olympics (2022).
    27
  1326. Interpol couldn't nab those druglords in Philippines. So instead, they nab the man who arrested those druglords.
    27
  1327.  @americanpatriot126  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    27
  1328.  @MarkYeung1  Taiwan's economic prosperity actually occurred while it was under authoritarian single-party Kuomintang rule. For decades, the KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who tolerated no dissent, and jailed or executed dissidents and political rivals. The KMT imposed martial law on Taiwan for 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single party KMT rule, Taiwan's economy flourished in what's called the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 and 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 and 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan's GDP grew by 360% between 1965 and 1986 and the percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 and 1986. And it's all achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the 1990s, when democracy was introduced to Taiwan (because the U.S threatened to cut off weapon supplies to Taiwan if KMT did not implement political reforms) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Today, Taiwan's economy is stagnating, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are seeking employment opportunities overseas.
    27
  1329.  @mmm6214  Look up the 2010 Forbes article entitled: Why Google Is Quitting China. It turns out that Google did not capture the majority market share compared to Baidu. Plus, Baidu was first to the market with mobile search and information offered up in multimedia, including video clips. Baidu also set up a national network of advertising resellers in 200 Chinese cities to educate businesses about the power of online advertising--a step that Google did not take.
    27
  1330. Nationalism is what holds a country together. Americans also have their own patriotic slogans, like "America First", "Make America Great Again" or "God Bless the United States of America". If I was American, I would probably swell with pride and patriotism upon hearing those slogans.
    27
  1331. If there was to be a shortage of food in China, then other countries that depend on imported produce from China would be the first to feel the pinch.
    27
  1332. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    27
  1333. US is playing checkers. Russia is playing chess. China is playing Go (围棋).
    27
  1334. Meanwhile, according to Kishore Mabubani, America today is the only major developed society where the average income of the bottom 50% has gone down over a 30-year period.
    27
  1335. The "American Dream" is that every immigrant can someday strike it rich and climb the corporate ladder to become CEO of a company. Unfortunately that happens to only 1% of all Americans. The "Chinese Dream" is the eventual rejuvenation of Chinese civilisation, to wipe away the humiliation of last century and for China to achieve a moderately well-off society and to revitalise the nation. As China rises, everyone in China is expected to rise as well, not be left behind.
    27
  1336. @Mimi I spoke to some Americans before, and some of them seem to think Chinese are only good at copying and incapable of innovation.
    27
  1337. After the Chinese swimmer won the race, many Westerner swimmers face suddenly turned angry purple 👿
    27
  1338. Agreed. Simply look up who funds this organization and it's clear that ASPI has an ulterior motive.
    27
  1339. If Westerners think they have the freedom to say bad things about China, then Chinese should have the freedom to say good things about China, not get ridiculed or doxxed because of our views.
    27
  1340.  @calinyx  If so, what makes you know straight away that he's a Chinese bot? Have you got an issue against Chinese?
    27
  1341. More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy taken off Weibo helps puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    27
  1342.  @TomStan-sw2wj  A marriage of convenience is what it is.
    27
  1343. Beijing is now officially the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both the Summer Olympics (2008) and the Winter Olympics (2022).
    27
  1344.  @billyehh  American napalm torched Vietnamese villages to the ground during the Vietnam War.
    27
  1345. Remember what? Tiananmen Square is one of the largest parade squares in China, and China celebrated the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China with a parade in the Square.
    27
  1346. They've also never understood sanctions, and sought to weaponize it only for it to back fire in the end.
    27
  1347.  @crosslink1493  Nothing's wrong with paper currency, it's just that most of China uses mobile payments, so returning to paper currency is kinda like travelling back in time. Also, ancient Chinese first invented the paper banknote, which later spread to the rest of the world. Now that China is rolling out digital currency, it's only a matter of time before other countries follow.
    27
  1348. The United States banned Chinese company Huawei, so can't China ban the National Basketball Association then?
    26
  1349.  @lalonguecarabine4952  About the "One Million Uighurs" in detention, where do you get this figure of 1 million? Turns out this figure came from 2 dubious sources, one of which only interviewed 8 Uighurs on what their estimated number of Uighurs in re-education schools were, and then they extrapolated the figure to arrive at the figure of 1 million Uighurs in detention. Source：thegrayzone.com/2019/12/21/china-detaining-millions-uyghurs-problems-claims-us-ngo-researcher/ While CHRD states that it interviewed dozens of ethnic Uyghurs in the course of its study, their enormous estimate was ultimately based on interviews with exactly eight Uyghur individuals.
    26
  1350. Trump is an exception. His MAGA policies have actually made China more self-sufficient, promoting development of local smartphone OS and chip fabrication technology. There's even a Chinese nickname for Trump, 川建国 which translates to "Trump the Nation Builder." Specifically, the Chinese Nation.
    26
  1351. Agreed. If it comes to it, American soldiers should fight to defend their homes in their lands, instead of dying on some other country's soil, far away from home.
    26
  1352. Also, Ukraine is a piece on that board.
    26
  1353.  @AmorFate123  Colonial mentality is an internalized perception of ethnic, linguistic, or cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization. Such people tend to worship the culture of their colonial masters, while harboring disdain for any "non-white" culture (including their own). Even Chinese aren't immune to the colonial mentality, like for example some people living in Hong Kong (i.e a former British colony)
    26
  1354. To Li China survived 5000 years without democracy, so why is there a need to adopt it? Because Westerners say so? Why is joining the world of democracy considered "the right way"?
    26
  1355.  user-ol3ru2kf1c  China's economy expanded by 6.3% year-on-year in Quarter 2 2023, showing faster growth compared to the 4.5% recorded in Quarter 1.
    26
  1356. Taiwan is paying money for American military equipment, whereas mainland China can manufacture our own weapons, tanks, missiles, fighter jets, warships, submarines and so on.
    26
  1357. Let's also not neglect the fact that Russia was the one who put forth a UN resolution calling for an immediate cease-fire, the release of all hostages and for humanitarian aid to enter Gaza.
    26
  1358.  @robertdlucas7418  Not when the company has been placed under sanctions like Huawei. Additionally, Huawei's HarmonyOS is different, it comes with modularized features with a micro kernel driver that makes it possible to disassemble, whereas Android OS is based upon Linux kernel at its core.
    26
  1359.  @andrenogueira5058  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    26
  1360. If you flip a coin, and Peter says the result is heads, you can bet your life savings the result is tails. That's how much you can trust him to be wrong.
    26
  1361.  @LoveWatchingNDEs  In their UN resolution, Russia did not mention anything about war crimes, nor did Russia specifically take any side. As for Ukraine, Russia has stated that they are open to peaceful negotiations with Ukraine, but the U.S is against Zelenskyy suing for peace.
    26
  1362. At one point, Canadian PM Justin Trudeu was struggling very hard not to accidentally utter the word "ceasefire" out loud during one of his speeches.
    26
  1363. Come to Xi'an if you want to see millennia of Chinese history. Come to Beijing if you want to see centuries of Chinese history. Come to Shanghai if you want to see decades of Chinese history. Oh, and come to Shenzhen if you want to see the future.
    26
  1364. "It's easier to fool a man, than to convince him that he's been fooled." - Mark Twain
    26
  1365. China trains more STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) than any other in the world. The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates (2016) 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: World Economic Forum
    26
  1366.  @christopherhamlin6139  Building military bases? According to Wikipedia: List of countries with overseas military bases, China has less than a handful of overseas bases, whereas if you look at the United States, the U.S has over 400+ military bases in Japan, Korea, The Phillippines, etc, surrounding China.
    26
  1367. Even earlier than the Great Wall, evidence of grain storage have been found in Yangshao culture archaeological site dating to around 5000 BC to 3000 BC.
    26
  1368. China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain, whereas the US sees only a zero sum game.
    26
  1369.  Charles Schmid  Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    26
  1370.  @michaelkatz275  China has been producing new billionaires much faster than any other country in the world, even the U.S. China has more total billionaires: 1,133 to the U.S.' 716. And its billionaire population is growing about three times faster than America's, according to Hurun 2022 Global Rich List.
    26
  1371. China seeks win-win cooperation, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    26
  1372. Rare earths are key components used in high tech devices, such as smartphones, digital cameras, computer hard disks, LED lights, flat screen TVs, computer monitors, EV batteries, solar panels, wind turbines,_ and so on. And most of the world's rare earth production is made in China.
    26
  1373.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou Will Ukraine have a voice, or will Putin speak for them?" Ukraine currently doesn't have a voice, it's the United States that speaks for them.
    26
  1374. And I remembered you said some of your American friends asked you: "Does your apartment in Shanghai have access to electricity?"
    26
  1375. Casper Cito If you watch Chinese media like CGTV and New China TV, they talk about China's success and about promoting better economic relations with the West, and how China's and Western governments can coexist peacefully. But Western media like CNN, BBC and Fox News constantly talk about possible war scenario with China and starting trade wars with China. So which country media is brainwashing its own people here?
    26
  1376. China is the world most populous country, and our resources are stretched to the limit in supporting our huge population, so there isn't much room to take in refugees.
    26
  1377. +Haruka ino Why are you asking trick questions out of me? Even the South Korean victims of Japanese aggression (now in their late 80s and 90s) are protesting outside the Japanese embassy because of the Comfort Women issue.
    26
  1378. It's actually thanks to the Soviet Union's involvement in WW2 that we didn't lose.
    26
  1379.  @MH-il1lk  You said: "because in America, there is freedom of expression." How ironic, given that your comment has been censored.
    26
  1380. In my opinion, India should forget about the McMahon Line being the boundary between India and China. The McMahon Line was arbitrarily draw by British, without regard for existing historical boundaries, and also without consulting China. But the "colonial mentality" remains strong within some Indians, so they continue with the line that was drawn by their colonial masters.
    26
  1381. Uighurs are Chinese citizens, being taught Mandarin Chinese, Chinese history and that their homeland is People's Republic of China. Just like Hawaiian kids are American citizens, being taught English, American history and that their homeland is United States of America.
    26
  1382. Agreed. Let the one who started the fire, be the one to put it out themselves.
    26
  1383.  @alexloong6396  Didn't the US government also use camera surveillance and facial-recognition software to identify the Jan 6th Capitol Hill rioters? As long as you obey China's laws while in China, those surveillance cameras help ensure order and protect people.
    26
  1384. Wow, the mythical "Xanadu" is actually a place in China? Sounds just like Shangri-La.
    26
  1385. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, rather than the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US's).
    26
  1386. Maybe "big countries" is not the correct term. Perhaps "countries with robust economy" is more appropriate.
    26
  1387. I agree with Martin Jacques. Chinese media clearly needs improvement in order to better communicate China's stance to Western audiences. Many Western audiences (but not all) hardly believe Chinese media even though they cite data and statistics. Yet Western media is very effective, almost everyone blindly believe Western MSM about China even when its unsubstantiated by facts. This shows Chinese media needs upgrading.
    26
  1388.  @crosslink1493  How's the joke at my own expense? There are videos of visitors to China returning to their home country after staying in China for a long period, and they felt as though they've "travelled back in time" to using paper currency when almost everyone in China uses mobile payment.
    26
  1389.  @godinminaar9024  This is how U.S logic works: Rule number 1: Those bio-labs in Ukraine simply do not exist! Period! Rule number 2: Those non-existent labs are for peaceful civilian use, not for military purposes! Rule number 3: If Russia gets their hands on those non-existent civilian labs, they'll definitely use them to develop military bioweapons for use in false flag operations. No doubt about it! ... (Hope that you can see I'm being sarcastic here!)
    25
  1390.  @bennettolocki1731  You said: "please remember if it wasn't for the US and it's allies, China would be speaking Japanese and Europe would be speaking German" Japan had invaded Manchuria in 1931 (8 years before Germany attacked Poland) and the U.S were content to let Japan occupy more and more Chinese territory. Only in 1942 did U.S join China in the war against the Japanese, and it wasn't for China's sake, it was because Pearl Harbor was bombed. So in effect, China had fought Japan for 14 years (1931-1945) with 11 years alone, whereas the U.S fought Japan for 3 years (1942-1945) with help from China.
    25
  1391.  Karen Xitler  Chairman Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. Yet he's being recorded as a mass murderer in the West, when the intent to murder isn't there?
    25
  1392.  @xpro2009  China has a population of 1.412 billion (2022) whereas Philippines has a population of 115.6 million (2022). So if we consider that there are 5.4 million Chinese in USA, they make up only 0.38% of China's population, compared to 4.5 million Filipinos in USA amounting to 3.8% of Philippines' population respectively.
    25
  1393. China has many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, to chart China's direction and set goals to achieve by 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. Abolishing the term limits means that our leaders can remain in power long-term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. Whereas the U.S Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years so they can only plan short term instead of making long-term plans (say 10 years or more) for America's future.
    25
  1394. It's even more obvious in their magazine publications on China since 1990. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet the fact is that China's economy grew 5% in 2024.
    25
  1395. Indeed. Brian is correct that that everyday person simply doesn't have the time and energy to carefully scrutinize the news that's being spoon-fed into our mouths every day.
    25
  1396. In the 1980s, USA also had a trade war with rising economic power Japan, where USA accused Japan of stealing American technology and imposed high tariffs on Japanese goods. USA blamed Japanese government's excessive "intervention" in enterprises as the fault for the trade deficit, and Japan made a lot of concessions to the USA.
    25
  1397. Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. But its already 2019 and China's economy is still going strong. Western predictions about China's economy failing have been consecutively proven wrong for almost 30 years already.
    25
  1398. "It's not so important who started the war, but who ends it."
    25
  1399.  @valenrn8657  Well, why was there a NATO base inside Ukraine then, if foreign bases are not permitted in Ukraine?
    25
  1400. China is also the largest printer of Holy Bibles in the world.
    25
  1401.  @chrishamlin5863  Because you need a certain level of infrastructure building expertise and Chinese engineers, architects and builders are most qualified to build infrastructure, so that's why Chinese workers are employed. But once other countries start training their own engineers and builders, then the projects can be turned over to them.
    25
  1402.  @FullPerspective  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last conflict in 1979. Which country is China currently at war with?
    25
  1403.  @stoa7302  Exactly. In China, the govt controls the corps, while in US, it's the corps that control their govt.
    25
  1404. They also say they want a ceasefire in Gaza, but they still continue sending military aid to the IDF.
    25
  1405. The mosquito only knows how to drink the blood of others, waging wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for example.
    25
  1406. @Gaming Champ Many Westerners often complain about Chinese being rude, spitting in public, smoking in non-smoking areas, jumping queues, jaywalking, disobeying traffic rules, speeding, driving past red lights, and other unsavory behavior, when not all Chinese people are like that. We feel ashamed that such bad Chinese represent China overseas, so the government is using Social Credit System to penalise bad behavior and promote better behavior. But if they persist with bad behavior until their social score falls to become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisances of themselves overseas. At least, until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again.
    25
  1407.  @armandomontillero8379  I think the OP was being sarcastic when he said Chinese "colonialism". He specifically put "colonialism" in inverted commas to indicate sarcasm.
    25
  1408.  @zetristan4525  "we should respect everyone, but the Party/parties are not the same thing " Doesn't the Party/parties also consist of human beings? It's the Chinese people that make up the government in China, then can't respect be afforded to them as well? Also how does the CPC not respect the people? Poverty alleviation has been at the forefront of CPC policies and according to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty. China's poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015, as measured by the percentage of people living on the equivalent of US$1.90 or less per day in 2011 purchasing price parity terms, which still stands in 2022. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Poverty in China) Does that sound like a government that doesn't care about its people?
    25
  1409. Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    25
  1410. Many Chinese welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors. However, many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands as unwelcome.
    25
  1411.  @peanutbar8882  It's in poor taste to make a joke of President Xi Jinping's name by deliberately misspelling it as PingPing. It has almost racist connotations to it.
    25
  1412.  @doopski  Chinese companies like Baidu are investing heavily into self-driving vehicles. But depending on where you live, the Chinese software may not be compatible with the American self-driving vehicle infrastructure.
    25
  1413. Self-improvement is China's response to competition. Banning the competition is the US's response.
    25
  1414. If American diplomats like Jake Sullivan and Anthony Blinken can behave just as rude towards China, no reason to think that American MSM journalists are any better.
    25
  1415.  @cchannel7857  Even Wikileaks cables support the claim that there was No Bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square. Secret cables from the United States embassy in Beijing have shown there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square when China put down student pro-democracy demonstrations 22 years ago. (Source: The Telegraph: Wikileaks: no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square, cables claim)
    25
  1416. So American taxpayers are paying for her trip?
    25
  1417. Chinese are pragmatic people by nature, and are willing to adopt new technology that works. China's government also plays an important role in driving the innovative forces and speeding up adoption of such technology.
    25
  1418. I applaud people like here. I also had the opportunity to study abroad and learn English to act as a bridge between both cultures, but I was appalled at how China is being portrayed in the West. Whenever I bring up China's achievements, some Westerners (but not all) just laughed at me, calling me brainwashed, and some even told me to "Go back to China if you like it there!" Even though many of them have never actually set foot inside China and seen what life is really like here.
    25
  1419. Macron has a history of making controversial statements, but in the end, capitulating to whatever the US tells him to do.
    25
  1420.  @Darkademic  One-Child policy was necessary at that time. Back then, China's population was growing so fast that it threatened to overwhelm the country. China has high child malnutrition, infant mortality, low literacy rate, because poor families had limited resources, yet too many mouths to feed. So why not pool resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood and enroll him in a good school?
    25
  1421. Rule No. 1: Don't March on Moscow. Rule No. 2: Don't Bluff Beijing. Rule No. 3: Don't Test Tehran.
    25
  1422.  @yl128pang3  Agreed. Meng Wanzhou did not break any Canadian laws while in Canada, yet she was unlawfully detained by the Canadian border authorities. Her rights were violated, she was not allowed by the authorities to contact her lawyer for advice, before complying with the Canadian demands. Her laptop, smartphone and electronic devices were forcibly unlocked and the contents searched by the Canadians, in violation of Canadian privacy laws. Worst thing was that the Canadians couldn't even describe what crime Meng had allegedly committed, it took them more than a year to fabricate a crime they could accuse her of.
    25
  1423. It's a combination of the “Red Scare” (fear of communism) and the “Yellow Peril” (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling fears towards China in the West.
    25
  1424.  @patienceobongo  You said: "神州 Shenzhou the West invented everything. It doesn’t need inferior copies from China." Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. Even the paper banknote was invented in China soon after the invention of paper and the rest of the world eventually adopted paper currencies of their own. Now that China is rolling out digital currency technologies, it is expected that the rest of the world will also follow one day.
    25
  1425.  @davidlazarus67  Exactly. However YouTube doesn't like it when you post the word genocide.
    25
  1426. @Nolan Shay Modern China was built by the sweat, blood, tears and sacrifice of the Chinese people and the government, to turn a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into an economic juggernaut today, a growing scientific and technological power, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, and China today has strong global presence as well as being influential player of world politics. And it's all been achieved under the communist party leadership. So while the Chinese Communist Party clearly isn't god, it has performed something miraculous by through its transformation of China from dirt-poor country, into a growing superpower today.
    25
  1427. The banning of both Russian and possibly Chinese athletes from the Olympics would be truly outrageous.
    25
  1428.  @paul-hh9oc  Singapore has been ruled by authoritarian, single-party People's Action Party PAP for its entire life as a nation! For more than 50 years, PAP ruled Singapore and when he was alive, Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore founder) was dictator who tolerated no political opposition. Thus Singapore and China actually share many similarities in our political systems.
    25
  1429. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiment in the West today. And it's having the effect of pushing both Russia and China closer together possibly than we've ever been in history.
    25
  1430.  @SzTz100  She literally grew up in China, and yet she learned English and studied in the West. Have you yourself been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    25
  1431. About the Boxer Rebellion, during the 19th century, Chinese anti-foreigner sentiment was rampant. The British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but had nothing of interest to offer China in return, so they waged two bloody wars and forced Chinese people to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it was poisoning our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to spread the addiction throughout rest of China and Hong-Kong was made into British colony. The Boxer Rebellion happened because Chinese people wanted foreigners to get out of China after that.
    25
  1432.  @jabertagi3857  Xinjiang was part of China long before Islam itself was even born, and it was conquered by the Islamic invaders who converted the natives to Islam.
    25
  1433. Exactly. Apart from Putin, there were 3 other opponents on the ballot paper to vote for in the Russian election. Russia also invited international observers from 36 countries to witness the elections.
    25
  1434.  @MarkYeung1  In 2014, Crimea had a referendum in which an overwhelming majority (96.77%) voted to join the Russian Federation.
    25
  1435. China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    25
  1436. The West desperately needs an off-ramp in Ukraine, but all they seem to have is an escalator.
    25
  1437.  @techovore  Democracy has multiple definitions, but is often commonly known as having a government by the people, of the people, for the people. Under this definition, the United States is not a democracy, it's a plutocracy with a government by the 1%, of the 1%, for the 1%. Because the U.S government is simply not doing what Americans want.
    25
  1438. Reminds me of Dyson Sphere Program (戴森球计划) a simulation game developed by a game company in Chongqing, China. The goal of the game is to harness the entire solar energy output of a star by building a Dyson Sphere around it.
    25
  1439.  @yurig2530  Likewise, Beijing wasn't always the capital of China. Historically, China has four great ancient capitals, Beijing, Nanjing, Luoyang and Xi'an (Chang'an). And Iran is known as having had the most capitals in history, 59 in total.
    25
  1440.  @mnp3713  Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    25
  1441. Indeed. Wafer fabrication consumes copious amounts of water, and when drought struck Taiwan, the island's chip-making industry was severely affected. Yet the U.S is transferring Taiwan's TSMC chip-making technology to the arid state of Arizona of all place?
    25
  1442.  @MarkYeung1  You're using the fallacy of false equivalence here, i.e. you're comparing apples to oranges. What has losing faith in the western media even got to do with Chinese media?
    25
  1443.  Dark Clouds  Organizations like NATO and the EU were conceived by USA to promote its clout over affairs in Europe. NATO was initially formed in response to rising Soviet military might, but the USSR has since dissolved in 1991, so NATO no longer serves any purpose or interests (except the U.S hegemonic interests).
    25
  1444. Do you also watch Brian Berletic's channel, The New Atlas on YouTube? Like you, he's an American living in Thailand.
    25
  1445. I love the fact how Brian uses previously published Western articles to debunk current Western articles. Yet ironically, many of his haters accuse him of being a communist party shill...
    25
  1446. Asian countries have a complex relationship with each other. There's thousand of years of historical baggage, often marred with conflicts with each other. Parts of Asia were colonized by the West (i.e India, Hong Kong, Philippines) so the people there tend to have the "colonial mentality," an internalized perception that the culture, language and values of the colonizer are inherently superior over that of other cultures (including their own). It is a difficult knot to untie.
    25
  1447. But how could the Western education system produce such students?
    25
  1448.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  You said: "I caught a senior University lecturer in my country (from China) making remarks about the justification of Russia's attacks on the Ukraine. When I asked him whether he was comfortable if the University knew about his activities, he pretended he wasn't the Professor, but oddly, the Professor quickly changed his YouTube name, threatened me with lawsuits, but deleted his LinkedIn page. His behaviour tells me he agrees that the University would view it as a breach of their ethics for making such posts." So this professor from China is lecturing in a University in your country? If there was truly "freedom of speech" in the West, then he should be able to make remarks justifying Russia's stance in your country. But it's apparent that Western countries are forcing people who voice a view different from the mainstream view is going to suffer consequences. Just look at the crackdown against Russians, Russian athletes and sportsmen, even Russian artists, musicians and composers are being pressured to condemn Putin or else. The fact that he fears your country's university singling him out as a breach of ethics just for voicing a different view is proof that there's no real freedom of speech in the West. You said: "Funny though, he acts like the West is crap but when threatened with losing his lifestyle, he becomes quiet about it." Of course, he should be able to make remarks justifying Russia's stance without facing backlash in the West, yet it's apparent that he fears for his job in your country's university only further shows that there's no real freedom of speech in the West.
    25
  1449. As the major contributor, USA also holds the key to ending this horrible situation.
    24
  1450. Have you seen the footage suggesting that some of the "civilian" casualties on Oct 7 could have been caused by crossfire from the IDF?
    24
  1451. Agreed. Apart from John Mearsheimer "Why is Ukraine the West's Fault" I would also like to recommend people to watch Oliver Stone's 2016 Documentary "Ukraine on Fire" as well as Vladimir Pozner: How the United States Created Vladimir Putin whose videos are available on YouTube.
    24
  1452.  @foxeskeeper3817  You said: "The youtuber, Mr.Janssen, he is working for CCP now," Cyrus Janssen's message is about "Building Bridges, Not Walls" between the U.S and China. If U.S and China cooperate then the whole world benefits, and if they don't, then the whole world suffers. Are you saying that Cyrus' positive message is the same as that being promoted by the CPC?
    24
  1453. China was once a poor, war-torn, starving nation in the past, but fast forward till today, and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (largest if you go by GDP PPP), the factory of the world, having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the CPC.
    24
  1454. China is also an engine that drives forth economic growth in the world.
    24
  1455. Those Uighur children from Xinjiang are Chinese citizens, and being taught Mandarin Chinese, Chinese history and that their motherland is People's Republic of China. It's like Hawaiian children are American citizens, being taught English, American history and that their motherland is United States of America.
    24
  1456. Should ask those who speak English in America and Australia also to go back to their country as well. It's only seems fair.
    24
  1457. ​ @astu0202 You said: "Whether China-India relationships worsen is completely dependent on China," China invited India to join on board the Belt and Road Initiative for mutual prosperity, but India declined joining.
    24
  1458.  @laserraiset3300  "In 2021, China's monetary authority, the People's Bank of China, issued more than 9.62 trillion yuan which was the highest amount issued in one year so far" Well, that just goes to show how much the Chinese Yuan is being used in circulation after all.
    24
  1459.  @rsuriyop  About the South China Seas, Vietnam PM Pham Van Dong had acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese, in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. As for the Phillippines, the Spratly Island was not part of Phillipine territory as per per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America.
    24
  1460. If a lie gets repeated long enough, the lie starts believing it Israel. Get it? Believing it IS REAL?
    24
  1461. Some Filipino don't want war with China too. And there are also some who hate their own Philippines president Duterte.
    24
  1462.  @eliotanderson6554  You said: "Unlike han supremacy or domination in china..." Ethnic minorities in China actually enjoy more privileges than Han. Ethnic minorities like Tibetan, Uighur, Mongolian, aren't subject to the One-Child Policy (unlike Han), and they enjoy tax exemptions, government subsidies, priority in healthcare, and education advantages.
    24
  1463. United States hosts these summits without really offering anything tangible to participants. China hosts these summits while bringing tangible benefits to other participants, such as infrastructure development (i.e roads, railway, highways, bridges, tunnels, etc).
    24
  1464.  @peterrose4340  Look at how the White House singles out Trump for the botched Afghanistan withdrawal.
    24
  1465. The leaders of Western democracies like Germany, France, USA, etc, have received low levels of approval, while surveys in Russia and China have shown high level of approval for President Putin and President Xi. It's apparent which political system is doing well and which is doing badly.
    24
  1466.  @youtubeanalyticsshare  Ukraine lost its sovereignty during the 2014 Maiidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) and ousting Yanukovych.
    24
  1467.  @joshlewis575  Not only do the polls indicate high approvals for Putin and Xi and low approvals for the leaders of Western democracies, but also look at the protests in the streets of Western democracies.
    24
  1468.  @jamilbrugsen1362  Where did you get your figures? Over 11 million Uyghurs live in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in northwestern China, according to China's 2020 census.
    24
  1469. Trump is MAGA: Making Asia Great Again!
    24
  1470.  @MarkYeung1  South Korea had no choice but to choose the U.S because of American troops stationed in its borders. Same goes for Japan, the WWII surrender treaty meant that Japan had no choice but to allow U.S troops to station in Okinawa, how can you call this a choice?
    24
  1471. There's one island that nearly everyone on the planet is watching right now, but if you ask most Westerners (but not all) they'll probably can't even point out where this island is on the world map.
    24
  1472. Western MSM won't show kind acts by Chinese citizens, they try and paint all Chinese as cold and uncaring people.
    24
  1473. The Japanese also conducted inhumane experiments on Chinese men, women and children. Prisoners in Unit 731 were infected with various diseases and subjected to live vivisection, often without anesthesia. Japanese scientists performed invasive surgeries, organs were removed, limbs amputated, and then reattached to opposite sides of the body, all while the subject is still alive and conscious. Prisoners even had their stomachs removed and their gullet reattached to the intestines, presumably to see how long humans can survive without the stomach. The women had it worst during Unit 731. There were experiments with sexually transmitted diseases, by first injecting prisoners and forcing them at gunpoint to spread the infection to other prisoners. Women were raped and impregnated (sometimes by Japanese themselves) and then vivisected at various stages of their pregnancy to study the effects of diseases on their organs or on the fetus they were carrying. Some Japanese scientists even raped female prisoners themselves and then had experiments conducted on unborn children they fathered with female prisoners. I mean, can you imagine if you are woman prisoner in Unit 731? Or that you are a man injected with STD and forced to have sex at gunpoint to spread it to other prisoners? Why not simply inject everyone with STD, instead of forcing prisoners to spread STD by sex? Can you imagine if you had your stomach removed just to see how long you can survive without it?
    24
  1474. Cao Cao played the role of the governor, the strategist, the general, the politician, the diplomat, etc, but too bad he was the antagonist in Romance of Three Kingdom, whereas Liu Bei's virtues made him the honorable hero of the story.
    24
  1475. ​ @billyehh  "Historically China has never been able to extend past the first Island chain." During the Ming Dynasty, Chinese Admiral Zheng He made 7 naval voyages, visiting Africa, India and the Middle East. Zheng He led an armada of over 300 vessels, some of whom were huge, spanning 5-7 times the length of Columbus' Santa Maria flagship. But the voyages were not for conquest of other lands, instead Zheng He focused on trading peacefully with other countries he visited.
    24
  1476. Agreed. The U.S democratic experiment in Afghanistan ended in failure with the democratically elected Afghan President Ghani abandoning the country (with truckloads of U.S cash) and the 300,000-strong Afghan Army surrendering to the Taliban in weeks with barely any resistance. It just goes to show that not all countries want to adopt Western brand of democracy.
    24
  1477. Many Chinese tend to hold a optimistic view and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners (but not all) are seemingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    24
  1478.  @vietnguyen4312  "The rubbish you put up regarding an invasion is one person speaking out of 25 million people." According to the headline New survey reveals nearly 50 per cent of Aussies think China will attack in the near future (at 5:10 of the video) so the view is shared by approximately 12.5 million out of the population of Australia. "yet the CCP are reopening coal mines and are by far the largest emitters of CO2 carbons in the world." Westerners have been polluting the Earth since 200-300 years ago, back when the Industrial Revolution started in 1700s-1800s. Whereas China only industrialized some 50 years ago in comparison.
    24
  1479. Which country is the most protectionist? Economist Paul Bairoch documented that the United States imposed among the highest rate of tariffs in the world, describing the United States as "the mother country and bastion of modern protectionism."
    24
  1480.  @ColoniaMurder20  China has 5,000 years of history and culture, being among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome and Egypt eventually succumbed to history. Throughout our long history, China has witness the birth and death of numerous empires, the rise and fall of various other nations, and yet China has survived the oftentimes violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact.
    24
  1481. Even Apple supplier Foxconn has pulled out of a $19 billion India chip factory plan.
    24
  1482. Exactly. Opportunity arises from adversity and the U.S banning Google from Huawei resulted in the creation of HarmonyOS by Huawei.
    24
  1483. I still using my Huawei phone since 5 years ago. Still works as good as the day I bought it.
    24
  1484. I hope that Eileen Gu's example not only inspires more Chinese athletes to take up winter sports here in China, but to also inspire oversea Chinese and people of Chinese descent to be proud of their motherland. She deserves the gold medal and I hope that despite the flak from some Americans (not all of them of course), she will continue to do both countries proud.
    24
  1485.  @carlabroderick5508  If those bio research facilities in Ukraine are for the peaceful purpose of discovering how to defend against epidemics and bioweapons, then why is Nuland so concerned over the data in those labs "falling into" Russian hands? Also, in the leaked recording, the candidate Nuland mentioned (i.e Yatsenyuk) ended up becoming Prime Minster.
    24
  1486. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the uni-polar world dominated by one voice (namely that of the U.S).
    24
  1487. Had that truly been the case, then Cyrus won't need to include sponsors in his videos.
    24
  1488.  @Something-tz2vw  Had distance been a factor, then Hawaii and Guam wouldn't be part of the United States, since they are located out there the Pacific Ocean, far away from the American mainland. Yet those islands are recognized as part of the U.S today, so distance clearly isn't a factor when it comes to territorial claims. "My question : Why do you care so much?" Because I am Chinese. But are you Filipino? From your first comment, it sounds like your wife is Filipino, which implies that you yourself aren't.
    24
  1489. Western media is always seemingly biased about China's economic slowdown. Just look at their reports from the 1990s. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China
    23
  1490. Taiwan work culture may not be compatible with American workers, but it's most certainly compatible with the work culture of mainland China.
    23
  1491. I hope that Eileen Gu not only inspires more Chinese athletes to take up winter sports here in China, but to also inspire oversea Chinese and people of Chinese descent to be proud of their motherland.
    23
  1492. No wonder why when I try bring up something positive about China, many Westerners just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill. Just for saying something positive about my country.
    23
  1493. The fact was that initially most of the world didn't really care about the concerns of those small Pacific Island nations. China's action actually thrust those Pacific Island nations into the spotlight, and granted them a stage and a voice to air their concerns to that the rest of the world starts paying attention.
    23
  1494. Agreed. This is reminisce of the 1962 Cuban missile crisis where Soviet missiles were deployed to Cuba, and posed an existential threat to the United States. Many applauded U.S President Kennedy for his strong stance, and refusal to back down, and eventually the Soviets withdrew their missiles. Fast forward till today and Ukraine joining NATO would allow NATO to deploy troops and missiles right onto Russia's doorstep representing an existential threat to Russia, just as Cuban missiles did for the USA in 1962.
    23
  1495.  user-bz4tw3bu9u  The Uyghur population has actually grown over the years.
    23
  1496.  @linmuxi  True. But India also had 20 years to grow its domestic companies, just like China.
    23
  1497.  @inkbold8511  Here's a link:youtu.be/pXBIeKpUq_c Aziz Isa Elkun, a Uygur poet now residing in London, had said he couldn't find his father's grave on Google Maps. A CGTN crew in Xinjiang began to look into the matter.
    23
  1498.  @ColoniaMurder20  Mongol Yuan era was in 1300s. How about the American-Philippine War, in which the Filipinos fought together with United States against Spain for independence. The Americans had initially promised to grant Philippine independence, but after the American-Spanish War, they broke their promise and annexed the Philippines. The Filipinos resisted, but still lost to the Americans and Philippines became an American colony.
    23
  1499.  @OlJackBurton  You said: "If people want to ruin their own lives they should be allowed to." This is a very negative form of thinking. You're advocating that people should be allowed to "ruin their lives" if they want to? At such a young age? Then why not let kids abuse drugs, drink alcohol, gamble away their parent's money, since you claim people should be allowed to ruin their lives even before their adult life begins?
    23
  1500.  @yuv06  I sincerely hope that if such a time comes, the U.S won't resort to throwing "military tantrums" around just because they can't sanction anyone anymore.
    23
  1501. +Shelby Jean You think everyone is lucky enough to be born in a country with plenty of food to eat, enjoy safety and security, able to attend school and other things you seem to take for granted? China was dirt poor at that time, and given only a single choice, most farmers would choose a son to carry on the family name (it's considered a dishonour if you fail to carry on the family line) and to be able to work out there in the fields.
    23
  1502.  @daviddoran3673  How countries has NATO expanded into? Answer:14 countries!
    23
  1503.  @rpg1663  "And yet it become a developed place waaaaay earlier than mainland.." The reason Hong Kong became developed because it provided Western countries with access to the mainland market. During the 19th century, the British demand for Chinese tea had grown enormously, whereas China did not want anything Britain had to offer. So Britain waged two wars with China and forced China to open up its market to opium (which we didn't want because it made our people sick and dependent). It's because of this that Hong Kong became a British colony to act as a hub to spread the drug throughout the rest of China.
    23
  1504. China is investing in both AI as well as developing countries. China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, ports, airports, etc, but it doesn't mean China has to neglect cutting edge technology like AI, quantum computing, nuclear fusion, etc.
    23
  1505. @Ben Benito Google left China because they lost majority market share to Baidu. According to Forbes, even though Google's market share climbed from 15% (mid-2006) to 31% (2010), Baidu's share went from 47% (mid-2006) to 64% (2010), which is a significant lead. Baidu also introduced several innovative search features customized for local tastes. Plus, Baidu was first to the market with mobile search and information offered up in multimedia. Source: 2010 Forbes article: Why Google Is Quitting China?
    23
  1506. I seen Hawaiian children being taught English, American history and that their motherland is United States of America. So what's wrong with teaching Uighurs in Xinjiang Mandarin Chinese, Chinese history and that their motherland is People's Republic of China?
    23
  1507. The Hong Kong youth built barricades and block roads, in anticipation of facing Hong Kong police, but they never expected Hong Kong residents themselves to dismantle the barricades. Hong Kong Police didn't even need to raise a finger here.
    23
  1508.  @argonanfangchen6865  About China's leader for life, China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership. Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US short term leadership.
    23
  1509. China is taking steps to help raise people out of poverty. According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is impressive percentage, considering that China has world's largest population, with only 6.5% poverty and astonishing 96.4% literacy regardless.
    23
  1510.  @daywalker0988  Who's kidnapping those kids? Those Uighur kids are being taught a proper Chinese education, free of charge, and they learn Mandarin, Chinese history as well as singing patriotic songs. I mean, don't American kids also learn English at school and American history, as well as sing patriotic American songs? Even the Native Americans kids?
    23
  1511. I enjoy your coverage of NED supporting colour revolutions across the world. A suggestion for a topic: The Solomon Islands recently suffered riots in a Chinatown, supposedly because the locals are angry over the government switching recognition of Taipei to Beijing. But this sounds like a half-baked excuse, I'm sure the locals rather care about their livelihoods than recognition of Taiwan, this sounds straight out of NED playbook.
    23
  1512.  @最爱新西兰  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Could you name any country in which China is currently at war with?
    23
  1513. Britain was a colonial superpower during the 19th century, and was eventually overtaken by the United States in the 20th century. But from 1-1800 AD, China (and India) were superpowers and our GDP made up to 25% of the world's entire GDP at that time, according to distinguished British economist Angus Maddison. And it looks as though China is all set to dominate the 21st century.
    23
  1514.  @chawrakaxom559  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt, have since succumbed to history. China has seen the rise and fall of many other nations and has survived the violent course of history to the present. Look, even Rome isn't around anymore today.
    23
  1515. United States is the World Health Organization largest contributor, contributing 450 million dollars, whereas China only contributes about 40 million dollars, so how exactly is the WHO in China's pocket? Or is Trump saying that the WHO should be in America's pocket then?
    23
  1516. Who needs enemies when you have friend like America.
    23
  1517. @Rachmadani Singapore is the only South East Asian country to have slapped sanctions on Russia, prompting Russia to label Singapore as an "unfriendly country", so Singapore certainly aren't neutral.
    23
  1518. Agreed. Assange's case is perhaps the most glaring example of this.
    23
  1519.  @MarkYeung1  Did CGTN ever criticize the ideology democracy itself? CGTN pointed out that some of the so-called Western democracies no longer appear to be democracies. Instead of being a democracy of the people, by the people, for the people, these Western democracies have mutated into plutocracies of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%, that's all, and that some countries are even exporting war to other countries, under the veil of democracy. The sad thing is that there are some overseas Chinese living in the West who believe that they are living in a democracy and blindly worship Western institutions of democracy, even though some of these institutions appear to be breaking down from within.
    23
  1520.  @ernestolynch1926  Russia actually helped evacuate Ukrainian children to safety from the warzone.
    23
  1521. Apparently, it seems that in the mindsets of many Americans, it's unfathomable why people would continue supporting a political system that's not a Western brand of democracy like in China.
    23
  1522. The U.S banning Huawei from Android OS, resulted in the creation of Huawei's Harmony OS. The U.S banning chips to China, helped kick-start China's domestic chip manufacturing industry. Likewise, the U.S boycott of Xinjiang products will hopefully spur Xinjiang to expand their markets elsewhere.
    23
  1523. Singapore is the only ASEAN country to have imposed sanctions against Russia in 2022, thus, earning Singapore a place in Russia's list of "unfriendly countries." No other ASEAN country has done a similar thing.
    23
  1524. Before I watched your videos Brian, I always thought U.S is playing Checkers (step-by-step), while China is playing Go or Weiqi (long-term game where you attempt to surround your opponent on multiple fronts). But it's apparent that it's not that simple, the USA is indeed trying to fight on multiple fronts, through NED funding anti-China activities in Asia. I hope China is able to at least take preventive measures against this.
    23
  1525. "Win against another country" implies the other country loses. It doesn't have to be a zero-sum game, all I want is for Meng Wanzhou to return home to China after more than 3 years in Canada. She's been kidnapped since before the Covid-19 pandemic started, it's high time to bring her home to China.
    23
  1526. Russia has successfully conducted its elections, while Zelenskyy says Ukraine will not be holding any elections this year.
    23
  1527.  @cathjj840  Chinese ethnic minorities like Mongols, Manchu, Tibetans, and Uighurs are not subject to One-Child Policy and they can have as many kids as they want. What makes you claim Chinese government is sterilising those young people? Is there really such a powerful drug that can sterilise people?
    23
  1528.  @chrishamlin5863  China helped Vietnam fight for their independence from France. During the First Indochina war, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons (ranging from artillery guns to rifles and machine-guns), ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help Vietnam fight for independence.
    23
  1529.  @ceu160193  Hopefully, India might one day wisen up to the idea that perhaps (just perhaps) Western-style democracy may not be the best form of government for their country. India could draw upon their history to find the best way to govern their country, instead of thinking that Western-style democracy is the best (and only) form of governance.
    23
  1530.  @christopherh2579  The old ISS was supposed to be a multinational collaborative effort, but it's been basically taken over by the United States.
    23
  1531. Rule Number 1: Don't March on Moscow. Rule Number 2: Don't Bluff Beijing.
    23
  1532. Chinese mentality tends towards seeking harmonious relations, which is probably a drawback when it comes to debates in the West.
    23
  1533. They can't even get Xinjiang and Shenzhen right, yet they want to speak as though they know the actual situation in China, and to speak on behalf of 1.4 billion people.
    23
  1534. The world's largest open-air concentration camp just got morphed into a death camp.
    23
  1535. BTC 8AB China is a big country, and of course Western China is not as developed as the Eastern China (right next to the seas). That's why the government is building infrastructure connecting the West to the East so that the wealth flows from the East to Western China.
    23
  1536. The U.S has a keen interest in Taiwan's chip manufacturing, but if they relocate TMSC's wafer fabrication facilities to Arizona, then won't the island be of no further use to them?
    23
  1537. Many former colonies (but not all) tend to suffer from the "colonial mentality". Even after physical decolonization, the "decolonization of the mind" needs to take place in order to heal those mental wounds inflicted by the colonizer on the minds of the colonized. Only then will countries truly be free from their colonial past.
    23
  1538. And he's on a losing streak.
    23
  1539. Another proxy has been abandoned by its master.
    23
  1540.  @harryviking6347  If the Nationalist KMT were the supposed "chosen ones" then why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? Back then, the KMT had everything. Money, wealth, superior weapons, U.S funding, and superior numbers over the dirt-poor, ill-equipped, outnumbered starving communists. Several times during the Chinese Civil War, the communists were on the brink of total annihilation, by the KMT and it was through the sheer communist will to survive and Mao's strategy like the Long March that enabled the communists to survive from the brink. After the end of the Long March, communist numbers plummeted from 69,000 (October 1934) to 7,000 (October 1935) while the KMT army remained strong at over 300,000 personnel. Yet you really think the communists did not treat people good?
    23
  1541.  @ryannverano6452  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    23
  1542. Exactly. China has 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, to chart out China's course for the future. By abolishing the term limits, our leaders can remain in power long-term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. Whereas the United States presidents have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only make short-term plans, instead of long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more for America's future.
    23
  1543. It's part of the Colonial Mentality. Being a former British colony, many Indians (but not all) tend to worship Anglo Saxon culture.
    22
  1544. Zheng He's voyagers were during Ming dynasty China, and China wasn't communist at that time.
    22
  1545.  @ondrejkujal5755  Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, rather than the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US's).
    22
  1546.  @nightmark2120  Recently, the Philippines has been rapidly improving its relations and cooperation with China on various issues, developing a stronger and stable ties with China, how is that one-sided?
    22
  1547. Cyrus, if you claim Israel has a "right to self-defense" then likewise shouldn't you also acknowledge Palestine's right to armed struggle against the occupying power? Armed resistance against the occupying power is a fact that is acknowledged by international humanitarian law conventions.
    22
  1548.  @ZDLiZugimDeutschland  Americans are always welcome to watch China's progress.
    22
  1549. Not only, but China also wants to help other countries develop self sustainability for themselves.
    22
  1550. China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilizations still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia eventually succumbed to history. Throughout it's long history, China has found that a strong central government (i.e The Emperor and the Court) works best for governing a civilization as vast as China. The Chinese government of today strongly emulates this model, together with a meritocratic form of governance (promoting officials based on merit) as inherited from the ancient Chinese Civil Examination system. I also appreciate that you have a good understanding of Mao's philosophy, as it is often misunderstood in the West.
    22
  1551.  @whatnani7372  Chess is a complex game requiring thinking several steps ahead of your opponent. Checkers is a comparably easier game, thinking only of the next move. Go (Weiqi 圍棋) is arguably the most complex game ever devised by man. Compared to chess, Go has both a larger board with more scope for play and longer games and, on average, many more alternatives to consider per move. The number of legal board positions in Go has been calculated to be far greater than the number of atoms in the observable universe.
    22
  1552.  Gaylord Manlove  Back then, the USA accuse mainland China of potentially abusing the Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now scrapped). Now the USA turn around and abuse their own extradition bill with Canada with Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou. The USA accuse others of doing things that they themselves are done. The sheer irony!
    22
  1553.  @guymajor7103  The Communist Party of China is most certainly not a monolith, and there are many different points of view within the Chinese government. But the advantage of this system is that once a decision is voted upon, the party presents an overall appearance of supporting those decisions. Whereas in the United States for example, the two parties are more interested in fighting each other rather than solving America's problems.
    22
  1554.  @doomsday8513  I watched Richard Medhurst too. I also recommend The Dive with Jackson Hinkle and Glenn Greenwald if people want to find out the truth of the Russo-Ukraine issue, instead of the Western MSM coverage of the crisis.
    22
  1555. +Shelby Jean And how do you expect poor Chinese farmers to understand the concept of contraceptives and birth-control? Furthermore farmers can't be sure about the gender of the child while in the womb. If born and it turns out she's a girl, then the family will be stuck with a girl and won't have another chance to try for a boy. And it's not just two hands and two feet alone, you'll need strength and endurance for hard work in the fields.
    22
  1556.  @ericreed4535  You said: "Our poorly educated make more than $50 a day, something only 2% of ALL Chinese do." Despite the difference in salaries, the cost of living in China is (generally) cheaper than the cost of living in the U.S. Food is cheap in China. Train fares are cheap, you can even rent convenient bicycles to save on commutation costs. Rent, gas & electricity is generally cheap in China. Whereas $50 can only get Americans so far in the United States.
    22
  1557.  @Andy-P  Xinjiang used to have multiple terrorist attacks, but after the reeducation programs, there have been no more of such attacks in Xinjiang, doesn't this fit the definition of Nobel Peace Prize? Because Xi found an alternative to the U.S method of dealing with terrorists.
    22
  1558. Some of the so-called "rebels" are Uighurs that came from the Chinese province of Xinjiang. They fled from Xinjiang after the Chinese government success in de-radicalizing the region.
    22
  1559. Feb 2022, Ukraine became the center of world attention. Oct 2023: Palestine became the center of world attention. Makes me wonder what 2024 has in store for the world. Will it be Taiwan next? Hopefully not!
    22
  1560. Well said. It's just a system of managing a country that's all, so by ignoring communism/socialism, they are depriving themselves of tools that could help the country. China for example, carefully balances socialism together with capitalism, in order to maximize the benefits to China.
    22
  1561. The Duran is a good channel when it comes to understanding the Russo-Ukraine conflict. But when it comes to China, I find that the two of them aren't as knowledgeable in this field compared to Brian and Carl Zha.
    22
  1562. This sounds like Westerners trying to push their feminist Western propaganda onto China. Look at what feminism done to the Western women. They empower Western women and encourage women to dominate their men in relationships, to demand equal wage and sometimes behave downright hostile to Western men. Young girls encourage to pursue whatever they want, to eat what they want, get tattoos, piercings, dye their hair, to grow fat and unattractive, and the Media will still say its okay to do so, and men will still find them attractive. No wonder why some Western men are put off by the feminist movement in the West, and encourage some of them to seek out partners of more traditionally feminine values like Asian women.
    22
  1563.  @neil6958  There are some residents who simply refuse to relocate and stubbornly cling to their crumbling, ramshackle houses, so the government leave them alone, but develope the surrounding area. These houses are called "nail houses" (钉子户) because they're stubborn like nails in wood, and they are dotted around China. Source: China's nail houses: the homeowners who refuse to make way – in pictures theguardian.com/cities/gallery/2014/apr/15/china-nail-houses-in-pictures-property-development
    22
  1564.  @OutragedPufferfish  I said "even" because of how the Western media usually frames the Soviet Union
    22
  1565. What the U.S does is transient, whereas what China does has long-lasting presence. After say 10 years, China would have built 10 years worth of infrastructure, whereas the U.S Navy would have conducted 10 years worth of warship patrols in Asia, with nothing concrete to show for all its efforts.
    22
  1566. Seems like no matter if your country is big or small, a continent or a group of archipelago islands, the United States will still try and attempt to divide up your country where possible, through funding separatist groups.
    22
  1567. Agreed. Singapore has actually been under (literally single-party) People's Action Party rule for their entire life as nation for 56 years, similar to China being under the Communist Party of China rule for 72 years. But the transformation in our countries has been astonishing under our respective leaderships.
    22
  1568.  @TheEVEInspiration  "They still have to do as the state pleases, that will not change by way of ownership." It's funny how you're the one comparing apples to oranges here. Doing as the state pleases is NOT the same as whether a company is state-owned or employee owned.
    22
  1569. 这种像Casper Cito的老外真的以为他们很了不起。呆在中国几年，就以为他们对中国的知识比中国人多。
    22
  1570.  @thenutbrothers8726  Chinese food is delicious, and many people all over the world have professed their love of Chinese cuisine. Want something flavorful? Try our Sweet & Sour Pork. If you want something meaty, we have Peking Duck. If you want something light, we have Dim Sum Dumplings. If you're in a hurry, just grab convenient Baozi (Pork Bun) and eat it on the go. If you like mild spicy, care to try our Kung Pao Chicken? If you like very spicy, dare to try our Mapo Tofu? If you are vegetarian, we have vegetarian Springrolls. And we are tofu heaven. If you like rice, we have Fried Rice. If you like noodles, we have Chow Mein. If you like porridge, we have Congee. If you like soups, we have Hotpot. If you like seafood, well you're in luck, because Chinese love seafood too. Even other countries have adapted Chinese food to suit their local palette. America has Chinese food like General Tso's chicken, Chop Suey, Beef Brocolli, etc. Japan has Chinese food like Ramen (拉麺), Mābō-dōfu (麻婆豆腐), Chashu (叉燒), etc. Korea has Chinese food like Jajangmyeon (炸酱面) Jjamppong, Tangsuyuk (糖醋肉), etc. Australia has Chinese food like Lemon Chicken, Chicken Stir-fried, Chow Sam See, etc. Canada has Chinese food like Ginger Beef, Newfoundland Chow Mein, Thunder Bay bon bons, etc. Philippines has Chinese food like Batchoy (肉脆), Hopia (好餅), Kiampong (鹹飯) etc. ... Sources: Wikipedia: Chinese Cuisine, American Chinese cuisine, Australian Chinese cuisine, Canadian-Chinese cuisine, Filipino Chinese cuisine, Japanese Chinese cuisine, Korean Chinese cuisine, So many people love Chinese food both authentic or modified to suit their tastes, so what's wrong with Chinese food then? I heard that in America for example, there are more Chinese restaurants in United States, that there are Western fast-food restaurants like McDonald's, Wendy's, Kentucky Fried Chicken, etc all combined.
    22
  1571. American diplomats like Jake Sullivan and Anthony Blinken are themselves "undiplomatic" towards China, it's no reason to think that American MSM journalists are anything but "journalistic".
    22
  1572.  @ngawangyoga9258  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    22
  1573. "Far better to light a candle than to curse the darkness." - Chinese proverb
    22
  1574. The sad truth in reality is that despite the abuse, some victims still remain oblivious to the abuser's flaws, or they try and justify the abuse or themselves as having deserved it. Some even cling to the faint hope that he might someday change for the better. Hopefully the "allies" of the U.S learn from this.
    22
  1575. @kooklocklan Have you visited Xinjiang and seen what life is like there for yourself? There are videos of people who visited, and the Uighurs can be seen dressed in traditional Uighur clothing, eating Uighur cuisine (such as Naan (Uighur flatbread) and mutton kebabs), singing and dancing, playing Uighur musical instruments (Dutar and drums) and so on.
    22
  1576.  @eddieyeoh4098  Indeed. Travelling from China to the West is like travelling back in time, where they still use cash instead of mobile payment apps.
    22
  1577. When China was weak in the past, many overseas Chinese feel ashamed about their homeland. But now, China is strong and growing, hopefully more overseas Chinese start to feel better (and proud) of their home country.
    22
  1578. Well said. If only more Hong Kongers think like you. There are some Hong Kongers that retain the colonial mentality, which is the internalized perception of ethnic and cultural inferiority as a result of colonization. People with colonial mentality have an ingrained preference for Anglo Saxon culture over any "non-white" culture, which may including their own.
    22
  1579.  @adamiskandar5107  Indeed. Had the mainland government taken rash action, it could have resulted in people getting hurt unnecessarily, as well as spooked the foreign backers into running away without ever revealing themselves. The government's patience paid off in the end.
    22
  1580.  @johnsoltan965  What genocide in Xinjiang? Ethnic minorities in China (like Uighurs, Kazakhs, Tibetans, etc) aren't subject to the One Child Policy (or Two-Child) and they can have as many kids as they want. The population of Uighurs and Kazakhs in China from 1953 to 2010 have actually increased over the years, so what genocide are you talking about? Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 Population of Kazakhs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 509375 1964: 491637 1982: 878,570 1990: 1,110,758 2000: 1,250,458 2010: 1,462,588 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    22
  1581. It's a combination of Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many people have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States, is simply too frightening for many in the West to fathom.
    22
  1582. Australia is behaving like "America's Deputy Sheriff" in the region of Asia, and they even seem proud to wear that badge.
    22
  1583. Indeed. Shenzhen's strictness has shown that it's possible to maintain zero Covid (even against the Omicron variant) and recover fully and eventually reopen back to a normal life. Shanghai's initially loose response has led to prolonging the lockdown unnecessarily, when it could have been shorter if Shanghai had taken it more seriously.
    22
  1584. The West complain China "silenced whistle-blowers". Next the West complained that "5 million people left Wuhan" and infected the rest of the world. But if China didn't silence the whistle-blower, then more than 5 million people in Wuhan would have fled China, won't that exacerbate the situation?
    22
  1585.  @newfaith912  "Literally pick any country in the world and i know more ppl from that country than from China. That is a BIG red flag something is not right." Most likely, the BIG red flag is you deliberately avoiding Chinese people, given that Chinese people can be found everywhere since we make up a fifth of humanity's population. and China is the world's largest source of tourists as well as international students.
    22
  1586.  @dziku2222  China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt eventually succumbed to history. China invented those Four Great Inventions precisely because of state-controlled industry. For example, gunpowder was invented by Chinese alchemists seeking to create a potion of immortality. That's why gunpowder is known as "fire medicine" (火药).
    22
  1587. Reminds me of the Chinese Emperor's words in Disney's Mulan (the animated version) "No matter how the wind howls, the mountain cannot bow to it."
    22
  1588.  @garywee2909  Americans: "We have freedumb to not wear masks out in public. We have freedumb to ignore social distancing guidelines and gather in masses to protest police brutality. We have freedumb for white supremacists to openly carry guns in public and threaten people who disagree with them."
    22
  1589. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    22
  1590.  @vietnguyen4312  You asked: "Why is the CCP suddenly aiding the Solomon Islands and undermining the generous support of Australia which has occurred for a very long time." I don't understand your logic. How are all those previous years of Australian support being undermined just because China is suddenly aiding the Solomon Islands? The Solomons are a sovereign nation, why can't they accept aid from BOTH Australia AND China? Are you attempting to frame it as a zero sum game? "During the recent riots why were Chinese businesses targeted yet Australian businesses were were left untouched? Explain" The rioters were from another island Malaita, and they traveled to the Solomons to riot in the Chinatown, because they were funded by the USA. USAID gave $25 million to rioters in Malaita to stir up trouble in the mainland. "After supporting Taiwan since 1949 why has the Solomon Islands suddenly denounced Taiwan? Explain??" For decades, the Solomon Island's recognition of Taiwan hasn't done much to improve the Solomons situation. In 2019, only a meager 1.89% of Solomon Islands exports go to Taiwan, but in that same year, a whopping 65.76% of exports goes to mainland China. After reevaluating the situation, the Solomon government decided to switch recognition of Taipei to Beijing, since it best suit their own country's interests.
    22
  1591. Time is on China's side. As long as peace prevails, the U.S will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise. China should strive to avoid getting suckered into a pointless conflict over Taiwan where possible.
    22
  1592. In a poll of nearly 7500 readers by the United Daily News (Taiwan Newspaper) website, 61 percent said the trip was not welcome as it may destabilise the Taiwan Strait. Only 38 percent welcomed the visit and said it had more advantages than disadvantages.
    22
  1593.  @MarkYeung1  The problem with Chinese studying in American universities is that Trump's "China Initiative" that specifically targets ethnic Chinese students in US universities of being spies. Stanford University professors say the programme is fuelling racism against Chinese and harming US competitiveness, rather than uncovering spies in universities.
    22
  1594.  @infernobat8325  "and this year ruble has declined from that title" Because the title of best performing currency requires that your currency first start low and end high, so that a massive improvement is recorded. So it's very difficult for a currency to retain such a title for long after such a massive jump.
    22
  1595.  @bungkusi2432  Exactly. Even Russia produces almost as many STEM graduates as the US.
    22
  1596. The problem is the mindset. Many Indians (but not all) tend to have the "colonial mentality" of worshipping AngloSaxon culture and language, while harboring a disdain for non-Anglo cultures (including their own). Even after the British left India, the minds of some of its people remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters.
    22
  1597.  @MarkYeung1  Australia is China's 8th largest trading partner, whereas China is Australia's biggest trading partner. China can afford not to trade with our number 8th, but Australia cannot afford to lose their number 1 trade partner.
    22
  1598.  Albert Moore  Why should People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 be annexed by a non-communist Republic of China 🇹🇼? The Kuomintang were the ones who lost the mainland to the Communist Party of China and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan). During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage; they were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were lousy, and they had far fewer numbers (only 50 communist members in 1921) over the Kuomintang. The KMT on the other hand, had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training, and far superior numbers over the the communists. Securing victory against the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT. Yet the communists survived all KMT attempts to wipe them out, employing strategies like "Long March" (长征) and despite KMT's initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan). This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland.
    22
  1599.  @ashokjain8449  You said: "Asians must unite. But it is not possible with China around." China is literally Asia, we are the world's most populous country at 1.4 billion people and Chinese people make up 20% of the world's population, yet you want to unite Asians while excluding Chinese? It simply won't be Asia without China in it.
    22
  1600.  @ohdearearthlings1879  Some overseas Chinese (but not all) tend to have the colonial mentality of worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture, while harboring disdain for any "non-white" culture (including their own). Being raised under media in the west has also amplified this.
    22
  1601. Agreed. Trump already made it clear that he was willing to use Meng's arrest as a "bargaining chip" against China for his trade deal. Even the new Biden Administration hasn't so much as uttered a word to Canadian PM Trudeu over the Meng issue. More Canadians need to realize that the U.S is just using Meng to cause the deterioration of Canadian-China relations.
    22
  1602. Chinese workers help manufacture products like smartphones, computers, appliances, electronics, toys, clothing, shoes, sneakers at affordable prices, to help keep inflation and the cost of living in other countries to a minimum. Think of the millions of dollars, people in other countries saved over the years on living expenses, thanks to Chinese goods, so that they can spend the money saved, on cars, apartments, and other luxuries.
    22
  1603. and "don't be fooled by the use of past tense, we are still doing that today..."
    22
  1604.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  You've just demonstrated that this professor can't even make a remark justifying Russia's stance in your country, else he faces consequences from his university. Not just him, there are many Russians living in the West that are suddenly shunned, if they choose to voice their views that differ from the mainstream narrative. Just look at those Russian athletes, sportsmen, musicians, artists, composers that face ridicule from people in the West, if they choose not to condemn Putin's actions, and going against mainstream narrative, even when their profession (sports and the arts) have literally nothing to do with politics. It's apparent that the West doesn't have true freedom of speech, when someone cannot voice a different narrative from the mainstream without facing consequences. You're just proving what the professor says, if he acts like the West is crap.
    22
  1605. Here's a Chinese analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family, which in turn open up a path to her ex-husband's doorstep. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    21
  1606.  @stchan8569  Singapore doesn't even have term limits. Singapore's President Lee Hsien Loong has been in power for 18 years (since 2004) while China's President Xi Jinping has been in power for 8 years (since 2014).
    21
  1607.  @bennettolocki1731  You said: "the Chinese schools teach that China defeated Japan during world War 2." Could you point out which part is wrong? Japan was clearly defeated after WWII and China emerged victorious is it not?
    21
  1608.  @maccheese8379  This Mark Yeung comes from Hong Kong, and many of the people there (but not all) tend to have the "Colonial Mentality", worsshipping the culture of Anglo-Saxons, while harboring disdain for any "non-white" culture (including their own). Even though Hong Kong has long decolonized from Britain, their people's minds also need decolonization. Otherwise, their minds continue to serve their former colonial masters.
    21
  1609. Singapore has been governed by authoritarian single-party PAP for 57 years, much like how China has been governed by CPC for 72 years. It's this long-term leadership that enables a country to plan long-term.
    21
  1610. It may be difficult to believe, but China's one party state essentially has to represent all 100% of Chinese interests (or at least 80-90%) because there is no other party to blame for any mistake. Whereas the U.S's two party state only has partial representation by either the Democrats or the Republicans who represent maybe around 51% of American's interests? (P.S Some believe the real figure is actually just 1% of American's interests, if you know what I mean.)
    21
  1611.  @mariajason3547  At 6:17 the polls show that only a minority (6%) of the people of Taiwan want independence, the majority want to maintain the status quo. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Amending Taiwan's constitution or formally declaring independence would be seen as changing the status quo, and the people of Taiwan don't want that.
    21
  1612.  @romanceidiot  Well said. If China rises, then the reputation of Chinese (as well as other Asians) is raised as well. However, if China is demonized, then Chinese will also suffer. I also find it hypocritical of mark yeung to assign blame to China, when China has remained neutral in the Russo-Ukraine conflict. China has sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine and called for peaceful negotiations to end the war, whereas the United States sent weapons and military aid to Ukraine to prolong the war.
    21
  1613.  @pn9959  There was a time when Phillippines Coastguard Patrol Boat (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) shot to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng (洪石成). Whereas in comparison, no Filipino fisherman have been shot to death by Chinese coastguard.
    21
  1614.  @Orwellian-Purple-Grapes-1984  To verify this, we would need to send an independent team into USA to investigate the possible Covid-19 origins in USA.
    21
  1615. Andrew Carson The problem is that China is willing to cooperate with other countries in terms of economic progress and scientific advancement, but countries like USA want to maintain global hegemony and contain China. For example, China has made great advances in space exploration, being the 3rd nation in the world to independently send people to space, after USA and USSR. China even conducted our first 'spacewalk' during Shenzhou-7 mission in 2008. But USA doesn't want to see a powerful Chinese nation, and there is a clause forbidding NASA from ever working with CNSA (Chinese NASA) on joint space missions. In my opinion, space exploration should be for the benefit of all mankind, but why are Chinese scientists being kept out of the loop here? NASA is even willing to work with former Soviet Union Russia on joint space missions, but not with China? How do people expect humanity to " march together to the stars" like that?
    21
  1616. China been fighting Japan since the 1931 Japanese invasion of Manchuria, (8 years before Germany invaded Poland at start of WW2) and China been fighting Japanese forces for 14 years (1931-1945) whereas most of Western WW2 was fought for only about 6 years.
    21
  1617.  @elanor2123  I gave you the figures for KMT strength which is 2 million (regular) 2.3 million (militia) (June 1946), and the communists strength as 1.2 million (regular) 2.6 million (militia) (July 1945) so overall the sum of KMT forces still outnumbered the communists forces. And mind you, this was after the Japanese surrendered in 1945, so there was no more fighting the Japanese. Did you take into consideration how exhausted, famished and depressed the communist soldiers must have been after the war as well? Corruption was rampant among the KMT, even U.S President Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", having pocketed some 750,000,000 dollars in US aid. The fact that despite KMT having all the initial advantages of wealth (they taxed peasants heavily too) superior weapons and superior numbers, the KMT still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan.
    21
  1618.  @elanor2123  You said: "The West does not want to keep Africa poor. How much percentage of donations comes from the west? 100% How much did China donate? None, as far as I know." But clearly donation alone doesn't help Africa break the cycle of poverty. Have you heard Lao Tzu saying: "Give a man a fish and he'll live for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll make a living for life!"? The West has been pouring donations into Africa, what tangible results does that achieve other than mostly filling some African official's pockets? Instead of just donating food and money like the West, what China is doing is investing in building tangible infrastructure for the Africans, such as roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, dam power stations, ports, airports and so on. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn starving country in the past, like many African countries, but China found success through infrastructure development, and now China is offering that same path to success to other developing countries in Africa, South America and so on. In fact, China is now the largest foreign direct investor in Africa. During the 2014-2018 period, China invested funds of more than $72 billion in Africa, creating more than 137 000 jobs.
    21
  1619. I've read that the United States is the world's most protectionist country. According to Global Trade Alert, the U.S has over 800 protectionist measures, the EU has over 300, and China only has 200-300 of such measures in comparison.
    21
  1620.  @calinyx  You mean like how Australian journalist Julian Assange who was held in Belmarsh Prison in the UK, just for exposing the truth of the US involvement in Iraq War, Afghan War, etc?
    21
  1621.  @etow8034  Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. In contrast, many Westerners (but not all) tend to be pessimistic and have a bleak outlook of the future.
    21
  1622.  @chrishamlin5863  Why are Trump's kids learning Mandarin?
    21
  1623. China even preserve and teach the Mongolian written script to kids in the Inner Mongolia province, whereas the people in (Outer) Mongolia use the Cyrillic script imported from Russia.
    21
  1624. Content that goes against the mainstream narrative will also be given less priority by the algorithm.
    21
  1625. Many Indians (but not all) are still suffering from a "colonial mindset" that's been imposed on India as a result of British colonialism. Even though Britain has since physically decolonized from India, the "decolonization of the mind" among many Indians is still ongoing, with some Indians still blindly worshiping their former colonial masters.
    21
  1626. Gordon Chang's book comes to mind.
    21
  1627.  @alifkazeryu8228  The existence of those terms doesn't necessarily mean that optimism is not in abundance. A global survey by World Economic Forum asking the question: "Which countries are on the right track, according to their citizens?" revealed the following: China: 10% Wrong Track, 90% Right Direction Canada: 50% Wrong Track, 50% Right Direction (Canada is the 50/50 mark) Australia: 55% Wrong Track, 45% Right Direction Great Britain: 63% Wrong Track, 37% Right Direction United States: 65% Wrong Track, 35% Right Direction ... Source: World Economic Forum So it appears that many in China think China is on the right track and therefore, hold optimistic attitudes, compared to the pessimism in the West, who seem to think their country is on the wrong track.
    21
  1628. If Zelensky knows what's best for Ukraine, he should sue for peace.
    21
  1629.  @JonROlsen  Glad to know that I'm not the only one who thinks so.
    21
  1630. The world needs more diplomats like Russia's Sergei Larov and China's Wang Yi, rather than American "diplomats" (if they can even be called such) like Jake Sullivan, Anthony Blinken and John Kirby.
    21
  1631.  @MarkYeung1  China is importing wine and lobsters from Australia, so where did you heard the claim that China slapped sanctions on Australian lobster and wine?
    21
  1632. Johansson Some of China's largest treasure ships were 3-5 times the size Columbus' flagship, the Sainta Maria
    21
  1633.  @DudeNoEdge  There are many different interpretations of democracy. Surveys in Russia and China have indicated high level of approval (around 80-90%) for President Putin and President Xi among the citizens of Russia and China respectively. Isn't this a form of acknowledgement by the people towards their leaders? On the other hand, many leaders in the west have rather low level of approval by their own citizens, whether it's USA, UK, Canada, Germany, etc.
    21
  1634. China is both a 5.000 year old civilization state as well as a modern space nation. Even if you are overseas born Chinese, there's nothing wrong with feeling proud of your motherland's achievements.
    21
  1635.  @INTJ791  About the South China Sea, the Vietnamese PM Phạm Văn Đồng wrote a diplomatic note to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, acknowledging that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958.
    21
  1636. Overseas Chinese descended from parents who left China back when the mainland was still a poor country. Living abroad and raising their kids overseas, means that those kids grow up with a negative view of their homeland from Western media, and as such, develop a "colonial mentality" of worshiping Anglo-Saxon culture while harboring shame for their own culture.
    21
  1637.  @sheilafong1594  A foreigner must have studied or worked in China for at least one year before purchasing property there. A foreigner can only own one property in China, and that property must be residential. There are additional requirements by province and city. ... So I'm guessing Guangzhou has it's own requirements for foreign ownership of residential property that Alica hasn't fulfilled.
    21
  1638. +randomguy8196 It goes to show that USA is unreliable partner for ROC, since it doesn't want war in the region. USA sells weapons to Taiwan because it wants ROC to continue remaining a thorn in China's side, and prevent true unification of China, which would decrease USA influence. As for 1-China 2-System policy, of course it isn't fair, but how else do you expect Chinese government to negotiate? At least under the policy, ROC can keep its own government, and PRC can keep ours, but if ROC rejects it, then what exactly does ROC want then? To divide China equally into half and have equal governments for both sides? That will only tear China apart so how else does ROC propose to solve this problem? The Chinese government hasn't attempted to take Taiwan back by force because they are still our countrymen and if possible, a peaceful approach is always better that outright war. The government can always fully integrate Hong Kong back into China (by force if necessary) and unlike Taiwan, USA doesn't care about Hong Kong, but of course, the Chinese government doesn't do that, and instead uses 1 China 2 Systems so that both our governments can keep our systems. Why don't you explain what is wrong with this policy then and how to better improve it?
    21
  1639. Learning a different language, grants access to different viewpoints. Learning multiple different languages, grants access to multiple different viewpoints.
    21
  1640. Wei kingdom is the best, and Cao Cao is the man.
    21
  1641. serpentza and cmilk always impose their own Western cultural expectations on China, instead of learning to assimilate into Chinese culture. They post videos like "Are Chinese girls easy?" and put pretty Chinese girl as the thumbnail to act as clickbait.
    21
  1642. Former president Trump had stated that he was willing to use Meng Wanzhou's arrest as a bargaining chip. The current Biden administration hasn't uttered a word at all regarding Meng, so isn't it clear to Trudeu that USA doesn't really care what happens to Meng? Then why should Canada continue to do USA's bidding, when USA doesn't care?
    21
  1643. During Korean war, PLA soldiers were poorly trained, had crappy equipment and little air support, naval support. Our only ally was North Korea for ally (Soviet Union provided equipment only) and we fought against the better equipped, well trained, combined armies of South Korea, USA, UK, Canada, Turkey, Australia, Philippines, New Zealand, Thailand, Greece, France, Colombia, Netherlands, Luxembourg, etc. with Japan in the background manufacturing war equipment for the Allies And yet, the combined might of 16 Allied nations did not win the Korean War? Even with all their superior training and equipment and combat experience? Against poorly trained, poorly equipped Chinese soldiers, with only North Korea soldiers as our allies?
    21
  1644.  @Darkademic  "The "continuity" or age of a civlization has no inherent value," I disagree with such a statement. The continuity of a civilization represents a way of thinking that has persisted for centuries, and in China's case, for millennia. With such a long history, Chinese leaders today have access to a wealth of information from political literature, governing manuals, military textbooks, etc, to help them decide how to best govern China, as well as China's interactions with other countries.
    21
  1645. Especially when Huawei is a leader of 5G technology and infrastructure, and that 5G could possibly form the basis of the next tech revolution. Countries that banned Huawei 5G infrastructure could be losing out on the next tech wave that is 5G.
    21
  1646. Pfft! Taiwan is a "flourishing democracy"? Taiwan had been under martial law for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world". But it was under Kuomintang's authoritarian rule that much of Taiwan's economic progress and development occurred. The truth is that Taiwan was ruled by single government KMT for almost its entire life, and only in 2016, did another political party DPP finally took over, and now Taiwan is in a slump. How exactly did Taiwan flourish under democracy? Or is it just Western propaganda promoting democracy as beneficial for Taiwan?
    21
  1647.  @robertoosido1232  If you're against the harrassing of countries, then you should be against the U.S fighter jets flying across the Pacific Ocean into the South China Seas. And against the U.S warships sailing into the Taiwan straits between Taiwan and the mainland.
    21
  1648.  @CoolStoryBro777  Democracy has resulted in wars across the globe, such as Vietnam War, Korean War. Even after the USSR dissolved, there was Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War and so on.
    21
  1649.  @chrishamlin5863  Again, because there just aren't enough local engineers, architects and builders to meet the requirements of BRI projects. That's why Chinese workers, etc are hired to work on those projects, while the BRI countries start training workers of their own.
    21
  1650.  @laserraiset3300  What makes you think YouTube is banned in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    21
  1651.  FREEHONGKONG-yn5ij  China controls 90 percent of the world's rare earth metals production, which have applications in phone screens, LED, TV screens, magnets solar panels, fibre optics, batteries, etc. Are you sure you want to boycott everything China?
    21
  1652.  @koshinyo4271  In 1971, the United Nations democratically voted to acknowledge the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 as China and to kick Taiwan out of the UNSC.
    21
  1653.  @INTJ791  If US wants to do that, then the US shouldn't preach about the "free market" when they force companies to sell themselves to an American company.
    21
  1654. Can't agree hard enough. The other countries can compare scores with one another, but China should set our own standards and strive to achieve what is best for China.
    21
  1655. Even if you debunk their lies and show them the truth, many anti-China people still continue to hate China, regardless.
    21
  1656. The West prides itself on tackling climate change, then won't access to affordable EVs be a priority? The Earth could sure use more affordable EVs on the road.
    21
  1657.  FREEHONGKONG-yn5ij  The Uighur population has actually grown over the years.
    21
  1658. Time is on China's side that's why. Taiwan is able to hold out due to perceived U.S support, but as long as there's no conflict, the U.S military might will decline to the point where it's no longer able to challenge China's rise, by which then reunification would be inevitable.
    21
  1659. Well said. The longer the conflict drags on, the less favorable Russia's terms will be for Ukraine when it finally ends.
    21
  1660. Agreed. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have long since succumbed to history. Now the wounded lion has finished licking its wounds and began chasing the hyenas back.
    21
  1661.  @rationalist805  Turns out Apple supplier Foxconn is investing $500 million to set up manufacturing plants in the southern Indian state of Telangana. That means Foxconn is investing in itself, not some other Indian company. Yet he said I am making a fool of other people?
    21
  1662. In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, whereas in the USA, the U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit.
    21
  1663. Before I went to sleep, my wife was complaining to me: "This Russia is such a bad country, if Ukraine wants to join NATO, it is their business and freedom, Russia has no right to intervene. This is just an excuse for Russia to invade Ukraine." I said nothing, got out of bed and went to the kitchen, before returning to bed with knife in my hand. I told my wife: "Let's go to sleep" Upon seeing the knife, my wife sat up abruptly and looked at me with wide eyes. "What are you doing? Sleeping with a knife?!" she exclaimed. I replied: "Don’t worry about it, let’s go to sleep. Besides, me sleeping with a knife is none of your business and it is my freedom." My wife said: "You're crazy! How can I sleep when you are lying next to me with a knife? What if you accidentally cut me?" I replied: “Well, you don’t even trust your own husband, how can you expect Russia to trust Ukraine? Sleeping with a knife is like Ukraine joining the NATO." .... An anonymous analogy taken off Weibo.
    21
  1664. Like Russia, the Houthis in the Red Sea are also waging a strategic war of attrition, forcing their opponent to expend their expensive missiles with the goal of making the conflict too costly for their opponents to continue.
    21
  1665. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners (not all) are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    21
  1666.  @everythingandmore5537  You saidb "The virus could have been stopped if china did not have a dictator." How's that so? China lockdown Wuhan and built temporary hospitals in anticipation of the demand for hospital beds, whereas Western democracies laughed at China's misfortune and mocked China's hospitals as_ "concentration camps"._ Meanwhile, Western democracies did nothing to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, so that's why the virus ravaged across the West. It's was thanks to Chinese authoritarian rule that China is able to control the coronavirus situation today, where it is out of control in the West. Including the world's largest democracy, India, at the moment.
    21
  1667. I've always heard the lyric as "You're gonna go f**k it"
    21
  1668.  @youmemeyou  "神州 Shenzhou Chinese Missiles" China's missile technology is among the most advanced in the world. The DF-41 is the world's longest ICBM with an operational range between 12,000 to 13,000 km and capable of multiple-independent reentry vehicle (MIRV) with a top speed of Mach 25. Even the US Minutemen-3 only has a range of 10,000 km in comparison.
    21
  1669.  @valenrn8657  The United States is the world's most protectionist country. According to Global Trade Alert, the US had taken over 800 protectionist measures since 2008, while the EU had over 300 whereas China only had 200-300 of such measures. Look up Wikipedia: Protectionism for the source.
    21
  1670. Many expats find that travelling back to their home countries is like travelling back in time, because of the slow pace of adoption of technology in their home countries.
    21
  1671.  @Tespri  You said: "China broke treaty and took away Hong Kong's independence..." Hong Kong was taken from China by the British. The 1997 Hong Kong handover was meant for Britain to return Hong Kong, not grant independence to Hong Kong. Where was Hong Kong independence ever stated in the Sino-British Declaration?
    21
  1672.  @SeamusMcFitz-jz9if  Do you have proof to backup your claim?
    21
  1673. China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    21
  1674. Practically an endangered species of sorts.
    21
  1675.  @altaic9202  If Americans constantly paint China as the enemy, don't be surprised if Chinese start treating Americans like one as well.
    21
  1676.  @mandarinandthetenrings2201  Why not? BRICS represent the upcoming emerging economies in the world, can't the BRICS countries choose to develop our own alternative currency and trade with it?
    21
  1677. Not when Australian journalist Julian Assange is still rotting away in jail. Free him and return him to his wife and kids.
    21
  1678. It would be better if the US channel that feeling into training and improving their athletes, instead of hurling unfounded accusations against their competitor.
    21
  1679. Andy Boreham provides a much more balanced view of the situation in Shanghai. I recently watched Cyrus Janssen's coverage of the Shanghai lockdown, and his opinion is that it's for political reasons and the upcoming third term of President Xi, that China continues the pursue the Zero Covid policy.
    21
  1680. We need more skilled diplomats like Russia's Sergey Larov and China's Wang Yi, not U.S "diplomats" (if they can even be called such) like Anthony Blinken, Jake Sullivan and John Kirby.
    21
  1681. This means that Brian's work is starting to have an effect, if NED is now attempting to cover up their tracks. The United States claims they are open and transparent, yet here NED is hiding information about which opposition groups they have been funding.
    21
  1682.  @currentchannel3452  The <Fight Club> book's author Chuck Palahniuk also said it was interesting that suddenly everyone cared about a censored “Fight Club” ending when he’s spent nearly his entire career fighting censorship and bans when it comes to his books. “My books are heavily banned throughout the U.S.,” Palahniuk said. “The Texas prison system refuses to carry my books in their libraries. A lot of public schools and most private schools refuse to carry my books. But it’s only an issue once China changes the end of a movie? I’ve been putting up with book banning for a long time.”
    21
  1683. Chinese diplomat can speak well-guarded English better than the president that can potentially cause war by shooting his mouth off on twitter.
    20
  1684. Tom Kathy Just because we have a different political system does it mean we are evil? We have never gone around propagating our system to other countries like the Soviets or the US with democracy. You can at least tell that Lu Kang doesn't want to a war with US and China, but China will defend its sovereign if pushed to war.
    20
  1685. Even in the civilian aircraft industry, China's domestically developed Comac C919 passenger aircraft recently flew over Victoria Harbour in Hong Kong. The Comac C919 is China's answer to U.S's Boeing and EU's Airbus.
    20
  1686.  @derquantenalchemist5180  "When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say.” ― George R.R. Martin (YouTube has done exactly that to your account.)
    20
  1687.  @MarkYeung1  China is NOT the West, (neither is the West China), so why should China bear the responsibilities of Westerner's perceptions of freedoms and democracy? What's most salient is that China's political system works for China, then is there a need for China to abandon this system and adopt Western style democracy?
    20
  1688.  @blyatiful4157  Like China, Russia is also a developing country and yet they have their own space program.
    20
  1689.  @thisiskevin1000  Also the U.S Military Industrial Complex like Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, etc.
    20
  1690.  @MrDXRamirez  China seeks win-win cooperation, while the US only sees a zero sum game. In other words, if you're not with them, then you're against them.
    20
  1691.  @peanut0brain  China brokered peace in the Middle East.
    20
  1692. Agreed. Covid-19 is like a global test that everyone has to take. China studied extremely hard for the exam and passed with flying colours and we are now celebrating our well-deserved graduation ceremony. Whereas Western countries had extra time to prepare for the test, yet many Westerners laughed at China's misfortune and mocked China's answers as too "draconian." Yet now they are accusing China of cheating, yet they are now blatantly copying China's homework after ridiculing them earlier.
    20
  1693. Hollywood also propagates this mindset. I can't remember the last time a Russian was portrayed in a positive light on the silver screen.
    20
  1694.  @elanor2123  "But the ccp is not the one who saved China.. The Chinese saved themselves regardless of being in the communist party or not.." But like you said earlier, China opened up and it was the Communist Party of China that did that. Those foreign investments didn't come to China if not for the CPC wooing foreign businesses with promises of a cheap, skilled workforce, so it was the communist party who facilitated China's rise. But you just simply refuse to give credit where credit is due.
    20
  1695. Their resume includes the Nayirah testimony and the Iraq WMDs claims, both of which turned out to be hoaxes as well.
    20
  1696. Indeed. And now Beijing is now officially the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both the Summer Olympics (2008) and the Winter Olympics (2022).
    20
  1697. 1. Abe’s maternal grandfather was a Class A war criminal. 2. Abe insisted in going to Yasakuni Shrine that interned the ashes of all of these class A war criminals even when the Japanese Emperor Hirohito refused to. 3. Abe pushed for the amendment of Article 9 of the Japanese constitution, regarding its pacifist clause. 4. Abe came up with the idea of the Quad. 5. Abenomics has failed and that is why Japan’s debt is 230% of GDP and the yen is in a free fall since March.
    20
  1698.  @jebes909090  I've glad that you agree with me.
    20
  1699.  @ysw8291  China's government would also be hindering itself if they sent an ambassador to the US who can't understand English.
    20
  1700.  FREEHONGKONG-yn5ij  Putin had never said he wanted to take Kiev in three days.
    20
  1701.  FREEHONGKONG-yn5ij  Only western media make such a claim.
    20
  1702.  @SzTz100  Of course there are. But as I've said, they're increasing being regarded as unwelcome by Westerners.
    20
  1703. Mao Zedong has been regarded by many people (including some Westerners) as one of the best modern strategists. Objectively speaking, the communist party was at a great disadvantage, they had poor training, poor equipment and only 50 members in the beginning of 1921, compared to the Nationalist army and the Japanese army. But despite those overwhelming odds, the Communists eventually emerged victorious in the Chinese Civil War and today, the Communist Party of China is among the world's largest political parties today.
    20
  1704.  @MarkYeung1  NATO tanks and military hardware were already on display as trophies in Moscow during Victory Day. More trophies are incoming soon from Kursk.
    20
  1705.  @chrishamlin5863  Well, why are bridges collapsing in Pittsburgh in the US for example? China is home to many of the world's longest, tallest and highest bridges, which goes to show the quality of Chinese infrastructure construction.
    20
  1706.  @ColoniaMurder20  Death toll of the American-Phillippine War: United States: 4,200 killed. The Philippines: 16,000-20,000 killed. Filipino Civilians: 200,000–1,000,000 died, most because of famine and disease; including 150,000-200,000 dead from cholera. ... What has China done in comparison to what US did to Philippines?
    20
  1707. "Today, America is the only major developed society where the average income of the bottom 50% has gone down over a 30-year period." - Kishore Mabubani
    20
  1708.  china is in decline  If so, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the UN like an independent country can? What's preventing it?
    20
  1709.  @item6931  How is Wang Yi even considered a "Wolf Warrior" when you have American diplomats like Jake Sullivan, Anthony Blinken, John Kirby making caustic remarks against China? When Chinese diplomats does it, its "Wolf Warrior" but when American diplomats do it, it's not?
    20
  1710. ​ @MarkYeung1  Where did you get your sources? In March 2021, China imported more than 300 tonnes of Australian Western Rock Lobster.
    20
  1711.  @KJ-yises  "The killing of 1200 on 7 Oct is part of arm struggle?" Recent footage has emerged, suggesting that some of the civilians killed on Oct 7 were due to crossfire. In other words, those civilians were possibly killed by friendly fire from the IDF. What we need is a truly independent investigation into the events on Oct 7 to determine what truly happened that day.
    20
  1712.  @joshlewis575  The 14th Dalai Lama sold out to the Americans! A total of 1,735,000 U.S. dollars (equivalent to $16,370,805 in 2022) was devoted to the Tibetan program in 1964. How would China react to this foreign agent?
    20
  1713. Agreed. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many Westerners (but not all) to fathom.
    20
  1714.  @Expat1975  There's a saying in China: If you want to see the past 1000s of years of Chinese history, visit Xi'an. If you want to see the past 100s of years of Chinese history, visit Beijing. If you want to see the past 10s of years of Chinese history, visit Shanghai. If you want to see the future, visit Shenzhen.
    20
  1715.  @Orwellian-Purple-Grapes-1984  Indeed. And those bombs that China cleared out in Laos were planted there by the United States military.
    20
  1716. Many Indians (but not all) retain the colonial mentality of worshipping Anglo Saxon culture. Even though India has decolonized from Britain, the decolonization of the people's minds still needs to take place.
    20
  1717. Space exploration is an important endeavor and as a Chinese, I'm proud our country is able to contribute to mankind's understanding of the cosmos.
    20
  1718.  @leehongjin6884  Why does USA have a responsibility to be world's policeman? US is bombing those Middle Eastern countries, killing civilians (Iraq Body Count Project) and destroying property, leaving families broken, jobless and homeless, harboring resentment against USA, so they flock to join the terrorists. That's why when one terrorist cell destroyed, another pops up in its place.
    20
  1719.  @sunnyboynfs  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like USA is a threat to global peace and stability.
    20
  1720. A "colonial mentality" is the internalized perception of ethnic and cultural inferiority as a result of colonization. It's a phenomena that continues to exist in many former colonies, like Philippines, India, even Hong Kong long after their colonizers left. Such people display an ingrained preference for Anglo-Saxon culture over any "non-white" culture, including their own.
    20
  1721.  @MarkYeung1  The problem arises when the United States foster military relationships with other countries in order to pit these countries against their own biggest trading partner (i.e China) and forcing them to pick a side.
    20
  1722. Most people in other countries want better quality of life such as peace, progress, roads, powerstations, etc, then what is currently being offered to them like invasions, bombings, terrorism, civil unrest, etc.
    20
  1723.  @jayeshsah1623  You said: "they put a condition that only Chinese company will build all the infrastructure and only Chinese engineers will be doing major high paying job" It requires a level of expertise in building infrastructure like roads, railways, bridges, highways, tunnels, etc, that's why Chinese companies are qualified and Chinese engineers are hired for the job. In the meantime, developing countries are training more engineers to eventually take over those infrastructure jobs once they have the capability to do so.
    20
  1724. China even built solar farm floating on water and then farm fishes/shrimp beneath the floating solar panels. The panels provide the fish with shelter from the Sun.
    20
  1725.  @TacticalMayo  Why is it that you would rather die that to see a world where multiple voices dominate, instead of everyone echoing the US sentiment?
    20
  1726. They only view the world through the lens of a zero sum game, where your lost is their gain.
    20
  1727.  @INTJ791  "神州 Shenzhou okay shenzhou do you censor my comment," What makes you think I have the power to censor your comment?
    20
  1728. And the Indians.
    20
  1729.  @ohlawd3699  Taiwan inalienable part of China and countries all over the world recognize the One China principle. In the 1971 Shanghai Communiqué, the US acknowledges that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge this position.
    20
  1730.  @johnsoltan965  The Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (national language of China) Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth and they learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America. Previously, Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region used to be plagued by terrorist attacks perpetrated by misguided Ughurs such as the 1992 Ürümqi bombings, the 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings, the 2010 Aksu bombing, the 2011 Hotan attack, 2011 Kashgar attacks, and the 2014 Ürümqi attack Source: 1992 Ürümqi bombings wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_bombings Source: 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings wikipedia.org/wiki/1997_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_bus_bombings Source: 2010 Aksu bombing wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Aksu_bombing Source: 2011 Hotan attack wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Hotan_attack Source: 2011 Kashgar attacks wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Kashgar_attacks Source: April 2014 Ürümqi attack wikipedia.org/wiki/April_2014_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_attack But thanks to the government program in Xinjiang, there have been no more terrorist attacks in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region since.
    20
  1731. Meng Wanzhou was arrested in 2018 and its already 2021 and still no progress even after 3 years. The Canadian authorities lack evidence so they need more time to fabricate evidence against Meng Wanzhou.
    20
  1732.  @शिव-ठ6प  Why don't you Indians settle your border dispute with Nepal first instead of starting another with China?
    20
  1733.  @nickiseb8910  China practices a policy of non-interference in another country's internal matter. Likewise, China expects other countries to respect China's territorial sovereignty on the negotiating table.
    20
  1734.  @Gobsmacked52  The people of Russia and China have long gotten over those events, only people like you seem to hang on to those past events instead of living in the present. Putin and Xi enjoy high approval and if the system works for Russia and China, why can't you accept that? I mean, are you even Russian or Chinese yourself?
    20
  1735.  @calinyx  "but it's kind of like north korea--they don't realize they're trapped" What makes you think Chinese are trapped? Chinese have travelled all over the world for business and for leisure. I mean, haven't you heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands? Or of Chinese international students studying in Western schools and universities?
    20
  1736. @Hyunbin Kim Many Asian countries (especially in South East Asia like Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, etc) also have barbed wire along the perimeter of schools.
    20
  1737.  @bellisarius6968  After WWII, Japan had to host U.S military bases in Okinawa (even till today) as part of the terms of the surrender treaty, so Japan can never be allowed to surpass the United States. However, China is free of such obligations and can grow our economy and our military to rival that of the U.S, and perhaps even surpass the U.S someday in the foreseeable future.
    20
  1738.  @koblongata  What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, before 2020, everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending coin on your tourism industries. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese students, studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, are expanding overseas, and Chinese investors are buying up real estate in other countries. So what makes you think Chinese aren't free? Chinese can literally be found all over the world since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    20
  1739. Additionally, since the majority of the Xisha Islands (aka Paracel Islands) lie within 200 NM (nautical miles) of China's geographic baseline, that means those islands fall within China's exclusive economic zone (EEZ) according to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
    20
  1740. China first invented the paper banknote and other countries soon imitated it. Now China is rolling out central bank digital currencies and other countries will soon follow.
    20
  1741.  @SwedeenXBL  You said: "NATO is certainly a defensive organization" How is it defensive? NATO bombed Yugoslavia in 1999 and has been involved in the war in Afghanistan and Libya. If anything, this indicates that NATO is not a defensive organization, and has expanded into 15 countries right up to Russia's doorstep.
    20
  1742. China: Cyberspace becomes Reality. U.S: Reality becomes Cyberspace.
    20
  1743. Sadly, this stems from certain Western influences affecting our youths, which is why the CPC takes specific measures like limiting the amount of gaming time children are exposed to, as well as only allowing a certain number of Hollywood films to be shown in Chinese cinemas. But I too share the opinion that more needs to be done.
    20
  1744.  @MarkYeung1  The difference is that the government in China actually listens to people's complaints and makes appropriate changes. For example, Beijing has just dropped the vaccine mandate for people entering crowded places after a strong online backlash from Chinese netizens. Whereas in the United States, the Americans protesting against gun violence often go unheard by the U.S government.
    20
  1745.  @natty55555  It's a pun. It's supposed to sound like "the lie starts to believe it IS real."
    20
  1746. Perhaps you could ask your French friend questions like, Why does he hold such negative opinion of China? Why is he so vicious about you expressing your own opinion? Has he actually been to China and see what life is like here for himself? There was this French speaker talking to Professor Zhang Weiwei and he never actually know about the situation of Xinjiang, yet he claims the "Uighurs are the most miserable people in the world." Video: Is China an alternative to Western democracy? youtu.be/vT4z4TCf4uk
    20
  1747.  @squidster3128  The more NATO supports Ukraine, the more territory Ukraine loses.
    20
  1748. Agreed. The question is not whether China will rise peacefully, it's whether China will be allowed to rise peacefully at all.
    20
  1749. Not just Red Scare alone, but Yellow Peril (phobia of the West being overrun with Asians) also plays a role in the rising level of Sinophobia.
    20
  1750.  @annam5388  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the U.S is a threat to global peace and stability.
    20
  1751. Taiwan island inalienable part of China.
    20
  1752. Why do people believe North Korean's missiles capable reaching across Pacific Ocean and into American mainland? North Korea will cease to exist if it ever attacked USA at all, so why the illogical paranoia? Chinese products have helped made cost of living in other countries lower, by providing alternative affordable goods, so sanctioning Chinese goods in USA, will cause a spike in inflation. Why resort to trade war where nobody wins? Both our countries have benefited immensely from economic cooperation.
    20
  1753.  @ironlionzion1380  "Shenzhou. Actually there was no disrespect from Chalmers and Pan admitted that." The story started when Chalmers did not acknowledge Pan's greeting before the men's 100 meters freestyle swimming competition, which Pan interpreted as "deliberate." Chalmers later clarified that he had not seen Pan's greeting and reached out to him personally afterward. He also sent a private apology to Pan, who responded positively by exchanging swim caps with Chalmers. Turns out it was all a misunderstanding in the end and they have since reconciled. But how did Pan "fanned" the flames of his Weibo fans like you claim? He merely pointed out what he experienced, and he did not made any post to inflame the situation further. "His dissing of the American swimmer was also uncalled for." How did Pan disrespect Phelps?
    20
  1754. Westerners' next target is Inner Mongolia.
    20
  1755.  Charles Schmid  It was during Chinese Civil War, of course Chinese were killing Chinese. Just like during the American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans. Or Vietnamese killing Vietnamese during Vietnam War. Or Koreans during Korean War or any civil war for that matter.
    20
  1756.  @ZastropollyonZ  China's political system has shown to be viable (and extremely successful to boot) so China sees no reason to abandon our system that works and adopt the Western style democracy promoted by the West.
    20
  1757.  @andrenogueira5058  Is there something fundamentally wrong with a American that happens to love Chinese? Why are you behaving as though that's a crime?
    20
  1758. Mustafa Genius The thing about fossil fuel vs renewable energy, is that one day fossil fuels will run out. Maybe it may take 50 years or 100 years, but fossil fuels are finite and the Earth's supply will be depleted one day. So in the end, humans will inevitably have to make the switch to renewable energy at some point when our fossil fuel reserves dry out. Or alternatively, some scientist could invent the nuclear fusion reactor (not the common nuclear fission reactor). Nuclear fusion promises an immense supply of energy and could displace both fossil and renewable fuels as the ultimate energy source, if somebody can invent it.
    20
  1759.  @ashokjain8449  What makes you think Chinese people need to be "rescued" from the establishment? Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    20
  1760.  @ashokjain8449  Look, China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    20
  1761. Some people can see through Western anti-China propaganda, but still fall for Western anti-Russian propaganda. Others can see through Western anti-Russian propaganda, but still fall for Western anti-China propaganda. Then we have rare individuals like Brian Berletic, who see through BOTH the Western anti-China and anti-Russian propaganda at the same time.
    20
  1762. +RealHipHopManiac In 1945 (after Japanese surrender) the Communists had a strength of 1,200,000 (July 1945) whereas the KMT had a strength of 4,300,000 (June 1946) so how exactly did the communists had much more manpower over the nationalists? The Nationalists still outnumber the Communists more than 3 to 1.
    20
  1763. It may be difficult to believe, but China's one party state essentially has to represent all 100% of Chinese interests (or at least 80-90%) because there is no other party to blame for any mistake. Whereas the U.S's two party state only has partial representation by either the Democrats or the Republicans who represent maybe around 51% of American's interests? (P.S Some believe the real figure is actually just 1% of American's interests, if you know what I mean.)
    20
  1764.  @akiheavenly6  Unprovoked? Haven't you heard of the Nakba that led to Palestinians losing their land and being crammed into the open air concentration camp that is Gaza today?
    20
  1765. +tesko radic Yes, there could be multiple interpretations depending on the context. Its like how in English, "left" and "right" can have different meanings in different contexts.
    19
  1766. Here's a Chinese analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    19
  1767.  @vietnguyen4312  "Taiwans GDP per capita is 4X that of CCP China." Because China has the world's largest population, so on the per capita basis, if you divide mainland GDP by our enormous population, then of course the GDP per capital of mainland China is lower than Taiwan. If you compare with India (world's 2nd most populous country), China's GDP per capita is 10x greater than India's.
    19
  1768.  @camt8804  Australian journalist Julian Assange was held in Belmarsh Prison in the UK, just for exposing the truth about the Iraq War and Afghan War.
    19
  1769. I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! Such "repression" going in Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for the best experience.)
    19
  1770. China's supercomputer Tianhe-1 (天河-1) found that the lungs of a young American vaper hospitalized in USA for "mysterious pneumonia" last summer could be exhibiting Covid-19. scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3079046/chinese-supercomputer-and-american-doctors-clash-over-ai
    19
  1771.  @xpro2009  So you're saying that the overwhelming majority of American Filipinos have Chinese ancestry. Yet sadly these Filipinos feel closer to the United States than to their Chinese ancestry. Again, because of colonial mentality. People with such a mentality tend to favor the culture and language of their colonial masters, while regarding other "non-white" cultures as inferior (including their own culture).
    19
  1772. It would be too much for hope for America signboards to be written in Native American language.
    19
  1773. The term "East Turkestan" was coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists, including Nikita Bichurin, who intended the name to replace the common Western term for the region, Chinese Turkestan. The fact was that the Xinjiang region was historically associated with China.
    19
  1774.  @Nesher92  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    19
  1775. Anti-China sentiment is growing in Australia, even though Australia is located closer to Asia than America and China is Australia's biggest trading partner. Yet Australian politicians like Scott Morrison are fanning the flames of racism against China and following US's anti-China stance.
    19
  1776.  @dertythegrower  "Shenzhou. military base, to make a port on a loan." Which country's port has China turned into a military base? China only has 1 overseas base (in Djibouti) whereas the United States has over 600 overseas bases located in Japan, South Korea, Philippines, etc.
    19
  1777.  @joebloe1401  Is that so? Cyrus Jannsen's videos have the underlying message of "Building Bridges, not Walls" then are you saying that Chinese are promoting this positive message? Isn't that a good thing?
    19
  1778. Fantastic job debunking the Anglo-Saxon narrative scapegoating China (yet again) and attempting to pin the blame of Sri Lanka's debt onto China.
    19
  1779. The Silk Road comes to mind, where Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, porcelain (aka chinaware) flowed to the Middle East, and were in demand in the West.
    19
  1780.  @thieunguyen4908  It's because the U.S poured foreign aid ($35 billion) into South Korea, while simultaneously slapping sanctions on its northern neighbor to stymied its economic growth.
    19
  1781.  @ColoniaMurder20  Taiwan was part of Qing Dynasty China. And the Manchu conquerors did away with the notion of a "Han-only" China, and instead redefined China as a multi-ethnic state, rejecting the notion that "China" only meant Han areas. Only you today still refer to China based on which areas consisted of Han, when this is no longer the case in China.
    19
  1782. I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad in the West, and I was appalled at the misunderstandings many in the West have about China. Whenever I try to bring up China's achievements, many Westerners (but not all) just laugh at me, some called me brain washed or a communist party shill. Some even took it step further and told me to "Go back to China if you like it there so much!". This coming from some people who never actually set foot in China and seen what life is like here for themselves.
    19
  1783.  @godwinmarvo9012  Can't Cyrus use a U.S social media to talk about how big China is on the Internet? Most users on Chinese social media already know this as a fact, but sadly not many on U.S social media know that.
    19
  1784. This reporter lied to the Chinese authorities about her job and masqueraded as a tourist in China when she's actually a journalist. Why come to China and then refuse to obey our laws while in China?
    19
  1785. Exactly. "East Turkestan" is a fake name coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists (including Nikita Bichurin) to replace another Western term, Chinese Turkestan. They are literally updating their naming of a territory that they previously considered Chinese.
    19
  1786. There are so many more intellectuals, like Daniel Dumbrill, Nathan Rich, Prof. Martin Jacques, Zhang Weiwei, Kishore Mahbubani, Eric Li, on YouTube that give far more insightful views about China.
    19
  1787. In fact, President Xi Jinping had once addressed President Biden as "my old friend" according to an interpreter during a virtual meeting.
    19
  1788. China's supercomputer Tianhe-1 (天河-1) found that the lungs of a young American vaper hospitalized in USA for "mysterious pneumonia" last summer could be exhibiting Covid-19. scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3079046/chinese-supercomputer-and-american-doctors-clash-over-ai
    19
  1789. China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain, while the US only sees a zero sum game.
    19
  1790.  @robspunk  China breaks WTO laws hundreds of times? According to WTO website on dispute settlement: United States: 131 cases as complainant, 165 cases as respondent European Union: 102 cases as complainant, 94 cases as respondent China: 22 cases as complainant, 43 cases as respondent. Source: Map of disputes between WTO Members wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_maps_e.htm So which country breaks WTO laws hundreds of times, if not the United States? Even the European Union breaks the WTO rules almost hundreds of time. The Chinese mindset cannot understand why the Western mindset can make such accusations against China.
    19
  1791. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    19
  1792. China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, compared to what Westerners have been doing in Africa for centuries.
    19
  1793.  @leqiaop1840  Well, if you want to understand Chinese culture and Chinese way of thinking, then listening to Confucius teachings certainly helps.
    19
  1794.  @ronwinkles2601  Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) that have revolutionized the world in their respective sectors. Paper and Printing made the transmission of information through text much more efficient. The Compass made navigation easier when travelers are unable to use the stars or the Sun for navigation. And Gunpowder has revolutionized the way modern wars are fought. But Chinese do not complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions.
    19
  1795. China is building bridges, not burning them, like what USA is doing by building a wall with Mexico.
    19
  1796. Taiwan can afford to stubbornly hold out because of perceived U.S military support. Although the mainland needs to defend our sovereignty, the mainland government needs to exercise restraint as much as possible and not get suckered into starting a pointless war over Taiwan. Time is on China's side, since the US is in decline and China is rising. As long as peace prevails, China will eventually cross this dangerous threshold after which the U.S would have declined to the point where they can no longer challenge China's rise, at which Taiwan's backing would be gone and reunification is inevitable.
    19
  1797.  @MarkYeung1  "If you're truly unhappy with BOTH Democrats and Republicans, then vote for a third party. Many Americans did." But that doesn't solve the problem, because either the Democrats or the Republicans get elected. That's the problem with Western-style "procedural democracy," it only takes into account the procedure, but not the actual result.
    19
  1798.  @fcl3294  Correct, the CPC does listen to the people. Liu Xiaobo died of cancer.
    19
  1799.  @MarkYeung1  The Westerner's approach to dealing with COVID is to save businesses at the expense of lives, whereas China's approach is to save lives at the expense of businesses. Loss of income through lockdowns is regrettable, but money loss can be earned back. But once those people lose their lives to COVID, then no amount of money can bring back lives that have been lost.
    19
  1800.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "The last few years had been been brutal to China imagewise. Doing business in China has become increasingly unprofitable and risky." In 2020, China had overtaken the U.S as the world's largest recipient of foreign direct investment (FDI) according to UN figures from UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development), having brought in $163 billion in inflows, compared to the $134 billion attracted by the United States.
    19
  1801. When the lie gets repeated long enough, the lie starts to think it Israel. (It's a pun. Sounds like "The lie starts to think it is real.")
    19
  1802.  @ngawangyoga9258  Here's a video of modern day Lhasa, Tibet, China (filmed by WildFilmsIndia) and you can see how developed Lhasa has become under communist party rule. Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, and modern technology like cars, telephone cables, computers, smartphones, WiFi, the Internet, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo (By WildFilmsIndia) Even the poorest Tibetan farmer can afford a smartphone, connect to the Internet and shop online in Taobao and have his purchases shipped all the way to Tibet in the Himalayas. Because Tibet is part of China after all.
    19
  1803.  @ngawangyoga9258  What makes you think Tibetans can't celebrate their culture in Tibet? Here's videos of Tibetans celebrating the Shoton festival in Lhasa. Video: Tibetan Festival: Celebrate the Liveliest Festival - Shoton Festival in Lhasa, Tibet 2020 youtu.be/7lGdfSZuKwc Video: Into Tibet 2020: Shoton Festival youtu.be/3IBFCESFOeo What makes you think Tibetan language isn't allowed in Tibet? The signboards are written in Tibetan language and under the Communist Party of China, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering courses in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Here's a list of universities and colleges in Tibet. -Tibet University (西藏大学, Lhasa and Nyingchi) -Tibet Minzu University (西藏民族学院, located in Xianyang, Shaanxi but under supervision of the Tibetan provincial government) -Tibet University of Traditional Tibetan Medicine (西藏藏医学院, Lhasa) -Tibet Vocational Technical College (西藏职业技术学院, Lhasa) -Tibet Police Officers Institute (西藏警官高等专科学校, Lhasa) … Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet So what makes you think Tibetans don't get too practice their language, culture and festivals in Tibet Autonomous Region?
    19
  1804.  GFHK SDGM  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. Tibet broke free of China in 1913 but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951 and even Indian PM Nehru acknowledged Chinese sovereignty over Tibet so what makes you think the problem would not have existed?
    19
  1805. The big American oil companies like Exon Mobil and Chevron have a vested interest in keeping electric vehicle infrastructure from being built, so that customers remain reliant on gas-guzzling cars instead of EVs
    19
  1806. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. Whereas many Westerners tend to be pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    19
  1807. Why you claim China has territorial conflicts with all our neighbors? China has settled boundary dispute approximately of 20,000 km with 12 countries out of the 22,000 km and is yet to settle about 2,000 km of boundary involving India and Bhutan. -In 1961, Nepal and China signed border agreement. -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1991, USSR and China signed Sino-Soviet border agreement. -In 1992, Laos and China signed border agreement. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border agreement. As for Bhutan and India, China has 21 talks with Bhutan and 19 talks with India but still fail to settle our countries borders.
    19
  1808.  @performancefluid3666  The President of China is elected by the National People's Congress (NPC), China's highest state body, which also has the power to remove the president and other state officers from office. Elections and removals are decided by majority vote. So clearly, China's president is elected through democracy, but it's just a different form of democracy from the Western brand of democracy that's all.
    19
  1809.  @1080GBA_SC  Indeed. Cyrus' videos promote the peaceful message of "Building bridges, not walls" between the U.S and China.
    19
  1810.  @jzNottobee  There are many different ways to measure "a long way to go." For example, China has produced many famous companies like: Smartphones: Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Oppo, Vivo. Electric Vehicles: BYD, Geely Auto, SAIC Motor, Nio. Drones: DJI, EHang, PowerVision, Autel Robotics, ... But in comparison, where are the famous companies from Singapore?
    19
  1811. I'm willing to bet that those Americans will have a hard time pointing out where Taiwan island is on the world map. Just like those Americans posting flags in support of Ukraine will have a hard time pointing out Ukraine on the world map.
    19
  1812.  @CyrusJanssen  Cyrus, I'm sure you're aware of Western anti-China propaganda, painting China in a negative light to their audiences. Have you considered that Western anti-Russian propaganda is also painting a one-sided view of the Russia and the Ukraine crisis? Why was RT and Sputnik news being banned in the EU? People listen with two ears right, yet have you heard from the other side of the story before arriving at your conclusion?
    19
  1813. Agreed. At the start of WWII, American tanks were largely inferior to German tanks, but after Nazis surrendered, Americans absorbed German Panzer (tank) technology and that's why American tanks are so powerful today. The German Airforce (Luftwaffe) had such successful aircraft designs that the Americans copied them. Even Nazi V-2 rocket scientists were put to work on NASA's moon landing missions.
    19
  1814. Philippines' maritime boundaries were drawn in the 1898 Treaty of Paris and they DO NOT include the South China Sea Islands. (Source: Wikipedia: File: Ph boundary in Treaty of Paris 1898)
    19
  1815. Many expats in China have found that on returning back to their home countries, it feels as though they have travelled back in time as many parts of China has embraced technology that's more advanced than their home countries.
    19
  1816. What about the West polluting the environment since 200-300 years ago, at the start of the Industrial Revolution in 18th-19th century? In fact, China only recently industrialized about 30 years ago, yet you want to blame China? Look at President Trump withdrawing America from the 2017 Paris Climate Accord.
    19
  1817. If European businessmen are not stupid, they should be inquiring into who was behind Nordstream.
    19
  1818. Where China sees win-win cooperation and mutual gain, the US only sees a zero sum game.
    19
  1819. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so thoroughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom,
    19
  1820.  @DerekKormendy  Even with demographic decline, China's population is 4 times the size of the United States'. It would take a whole lot of declining in order for the USA to catch up.
    19
  1821. China seeks win-win cooperation, while the US only sees a zero sum game.
    19
  1822.  @luodeligesi7238  "神州 Shenzhou Trump represents a minority of all Americans" Trump was the most voted for President in 2016 (that's why he won) and he was the 2nd most voted for in 2020. Over 70 million voted for Trump in 2020, so it appears that he represents a significant number of American voters, so there is some experts predicting the possible return of Trump (or another Trump-like candidate) in the next U.S election.
    19
  1823. Indeed. Cyrus Janssen's message is about Building Bridges, Not Walls between China and the USA. If China and U.S cooperate, then the whole world benefits. If they don't then the whole world suffers.
    19
  1824. +Haruka ino In my opinion, Tibet today is much better off than in under Dalai Lama rule. Tibetans today enjoy access to all the modern technology like smartphones, computers, Internet, WiFi, etc, that they couldn't under the Dalai Lama rule. You can log onto Chinese online shopping websites, like Taobao, and they will deliver your purchases right to your doorstep, even if you live in faraway Tibet.
    19
  1825.  @adamnealis  The population of Tibet Autonomous Region is comprised of 86% ethnic Tibetan, 12.2% ethnic Han and 0.8% other ethnicities. So the majority of the people in Tibet are ethnic Tibetans.
    19
  1826. It's like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic when the ship is sinking.
    19
  1827. Honestly speaking, most Americans can't even point out where Taiwan island is on the world map, yet the US government is making Taiwan one of their core issue?
    19
  1828. China believes in a community with a shared future for mankind.
    19
  1829.  @mimikurtz2162  According to World Intellectual Property Indicators, China applies for more patents and trademarks than any other in the world, so what intellectual/commercial piracy are you talking about?
    19
  1830.  @peterlim1972  Well said. Netanyahu wasn't even popular before Oct 7 happened and he was mired in corruption. He using Hamas as an excuse to draw attention away from those scandals.
    19
  1831.  @x-man5056  Ton is a measurement of weight. CO2 is 3.67 times heavier than carbon. Coal (specifically bituminous coal) has an average carbon content of 66%. Since 66% of 1 kg is 660 g, there are about 660 g of carbon atoms in 1 kilo of bituminous coal. Multiplying 660 by 3.67 gives us 2420. Therefore, burning 1 kg of bituminous coal will produce 2.42 kg of carbon dioxide. It's a one-to-two ratio. Hence 100 million tons of CO2 is produced from burning 50 million tons of coal.
    19
  1832.  @ashokjain8449  What makes you think China's unpopular all over the world? China has beaten the US in the battle for world opinion over the handling of coronavirus, according to new polling, with only three countries out of 53 believing the US has dealt with the pandemic better than its superpower rival. Source: Only three out of 53 countries say US has handled coronavirus better than China theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/15/only-three-out-of-53-countries-say-us-has-handled-coronavirus-better-than-china The 53-country survey of 120,000 people by the German polling firm Dalia Research and the Alliance of Democracies Foundation, an organisation headed by the former Nato secretary general Anders Fogh Rasmussen, reveals deep dissatisfaction with US leadership.
    19
  1833.  Muhammad Ariq Muafan  Yes, Xinjiang used to be plagued by terrorist attacks such as the 1992 Ürümqi bombings, the 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings, the 2010 Aksu bombing, the 2011 Hotan attack, 2011 Kashgar attacks, and the 2014 Ürümqi attack But thanks to the government program in Xinjiang, there have been no more terrorist attacks in Xinjiang since.
    19
  1834. Back then China was poor and suffered from brain drain, as people migrated out of China to developed countries in the West. However, now China is experiencing a reverse brain drain where people from developed countries are migrating to a developing country like China for more opportunities.
    19
  1835. The United States Army lost the Vietnam War to starving communist Vietnamese peasants, and USA did not win the Korean war against the People's Liberation Army, so what makes the uploader think USA can destroy China's military? Even the USA fought wars in the Middle East for almost 15 years already with still no end in sight, against a few, poorly equipped insurgents. In 15 years, a soldier's children back home can easily grow up in such time period, and yet the USA still haven't won the wars in the Middle East?
    19
  1836. Exactly. It's strange how the USA is against Muslims and against Chinese, but they somehow care about Chinese Muslim?
    19
  1837. I feel bad for the other 5 Eyes countries (i.e Australia, UK, Canada, New Zealand) for hopping on the "boycott wagon" after the Biden administration announced that USA will be boycotting the Beijing Olympics diplomatically. Now the USA flipped their stance and they will be sending 18 officials to attend the Olympics in Beijing. Video: Canada joins US, UK & Australia in diplomatic boycott of Beijing Olympics| 2022 Winter Olympics News youtu.be/_s4D8XvKINE Video: US applies for 18 officials to attend Beijing Olympics despite boycott announcement youtu.be/Vg3WyImPe7w The USA is literally taking the other 5 Eyes countries for a ride and now they are left to carry the baby.
    19
  1838. "United States is the only major developed country where the average income of the bottom 50 percent has gone down over 30-year period." - Kishore Mabubani, former UN Security Council President.
    19
  1839.  @inkbold8511  Many Indians are suffering from the subservient "colonial mindset" inflicted on the minds of the colonized by the colonizer, and while India has physically decolonized, the "decolonization of the mind" still needs to happen.
    19
  1840. I hope that Eileen Gu's example not only inspires more Chinese athletes to take up winter sports here in China, but to also inspire oversea Chinese and people of Chinese descent to be proud of their motherland. She truly deserves her gold medal.
    19
  1841.  @currentchannel3452  If you claim Cyrus is somehow being paid by China to promote his peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" then isn't that a positive message for the world? U.S-China relations have deteriorated to their lowest point in decades, and a potential hot war would not only be disastrous for both our countries, but for the rest of the world as well. So isn't Cyrus message of "don't fear China" a good message to help diffuse the fear and paranoia towards China?
    19
  1842.  @currentchannel3452  David Fincher’s 1999 movie, 《Fight Club》is based on author Chuck Palahniuk's 1996 novel of the same name. China’s ending is actually closer to Palahniuk’s original vision for the ending of “Fight Club,” as written in his 1996 book. As Palahniuk told TMZ while reacting to China’s censorship, “The irony is that the way the Chinese have changed it is they’ve aligned the ending almost exactly with the ending of the book, as opposed to Fincher’s ending, which was the more spectacular visual ending. So in a way, the Chinese brought the movie back to the book a little bit.”
    19
  1843. +최민준 I agree that Chinese and Korean are two completely different languages just like Chinese and Japanese, and Korean and Japanese. The Hangul suited the Korean language and it is good for the country as a result. But you made some insults in your argument that would probably anger people who speak Chinese. You said that "Chinese is made up of short words for a simple people, while Korean is an agglutinative and well composed language" Chinese words are short because Chinese believe that breath is important and we shouldn't waste words or breath while speaking. That is why one word represents one sound. That doesn't mean Chinese are "simple people". Those few sounds must be pronounced correctly using the proper tone or else it is wrong. With short words you can create complex sentences without sounding long-winded. For example, If complex ideas can be expressed in 1 or 2 sounds, how many ideas can you squeeze into a set of 8 sounds? Can you squeeze in the same amount with other languages? As for the writing system, Chinese doesn't need an alphabetical system. Chinese words are difficult to pronounce even in English. Words like Xin, Qian, Cuo, Xie, Qi won't get easier to pronounce just cause you use an alphabetical system. Instead Chinese characters are used to unite all the different dialects of China. A picture has no sound associated with it, so 女 -> Nu in Mandarin, Neoi in Cantonese, Neng in Teochew and so on. Even 女 is On'na in Japanese. 女 means Woman in English btw. I'm not trying to prove that Chinese is superior but I am defending it against people who say "Chinese is made up of short words for a simple people" It is well-known that Chinese a compact and precise language but you can still form long sentences if you want to.
    18
  1844. To relax and sip tea quietly along the streets of Ba Sing Se...
    18
  1845.  @calinyx  So, you've been to places in China where Putonghua is not spoken? Which parts of China are those?
    18
  1846. Singapore's and China's political systems share much in common. For example, Singapore has been ruled by PAP for 57 years, much like how China has been ruled by CPC for 73 years.
    18
  1847. Agreed. If U.S does succeed in transferring Taiwan's TSMC wafer fabrication technology to Arizona, the island is of no further use to them.
    18
  1848.  @patrikpass2962  Throughout Cyrus' videos, he promotes his message of "Building Bridges, not Walls" between countries. If that positive message is somehow "being sponsored" by the Communist Party of China, then doesn't that mean that the CPC wants to promote cooperation, not confrontation? (Assuming what you said is true, that Cyrus is somehow being paid by the CPC to promote such a positive message on his channel.)
    18
  1849.  @alloomis1635  Yes, Nancy Pelosi is one example.
    18
  1850. In other words, who needs enemies when you have a friend like the USA?
    18
  1851. True. China's stance can be summarized through the following proverb: "Let he who tied the bell on the tiger, be the one to take it off." (解铃还须系铃人)
    18
  1852.  @honeybear9376  Just like Joshua Wong, mark yeung also suffers from a "colonial mentality" due to Hong Kong's previous status as a British colony. Even though Hong Kong has been physically decolonized, the "decolonization of the mind" needs to happen to reverse the mental damage inflicted by the colonizer on the minds of the colonized. Otherwise, their thoughts and action continue to serve the interests of their previous colonial masters.
    18
  1853. ​ @peterretep1010  The word "China" has been used in English since the 16th century. China was well-known throughout the ancient world for its porcelain, so much such that the previous ceramic was also referred to as "fine china." One of the lucrative trade routes along the Silk Road was chinaware.
    18
  1854.  @Naikomi95  According to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty; China's poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015.
    18
  1855. China is taking it a step further, by promoting the farming of fish and expanding aquaculture capacity.
    18
  1856.  @elanor2123  You said: "Peng Shuai, a worldstar tennis player who accused one of the highest ranked ccp member of abuse, was taken into custody. She now denies what she clearly said on Weibo," I read Peng Shuai's original post on Weibo (full translation available on Reddit) and could you point out where in her post did she accused a high ranking communist member of abuse? In fact, Peng Shuai actually consented to sex, here's what Peng Shuai wrote in her post: Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well. So where's the allegation of sexual abuse in Peng Shuai's post? Could you perhaps quote me her exact words where she accused a CPC member of sexual abuse? On 17 November, Peng Shuai wrote an email to Simon Simons of WTA, in which she said she was resting at home and that the allegation of sexual assault was not true. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what she called unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    18
  1857. Back in 1980s, China was suffering from overpopulation, and there was insufficient resources to support such a large population. What's the point of having more than one child per family, if there's not enough food to feed every child, not enough schools to send kids to, not enough hospitals to provide sufficient healthcare? Why not have only a single child instead and pour resource into raising him/her healthily?
    18
  1858. Agreed. If Australia continually treat China "like the enemy", then why should China continue treating Australia like a friend?
    18
  1859. Exactly. Nato has expanded into 18 countries right up to Russia's doorstep.
    18
  1860. Western countries spent centuries in Africa, whereas China spent decades building new infrastructure in Africa like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels.
    18
  1861.  @billyehh  "Shenzhou. Where is that going? US imports are down 20%" Probably towards increasing trade with Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc.
    18
  1862. But how does Trump repay these police officers for doing his dirty work? By slapping sanctions on steel and aluminium on Canada, their so-called "best buddy".
    18
  1863.  @kuga7423  Chinese know first-hand the debilitating effects of addictive substances and how much they can weaken a country as China was as a result of the Opium Wars.
    18
  1864.  @MarkYeung1  The factory can remain operational during a pandemic, but if other countries choose to boycott Chinese products, then the fault lies not with China but with those other countries.
    18
  1865.  @blitz12399  It's from Sky News: NATO discussed sending nuclear weapons to Ukraine before invasion.
    18
  1866.  @rufanuf1  Taiwan has been under the authoritarian single-party rule of Kuomintang (Guomindang) for more than half its life. For decades, the KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, and Chiang Kai Shek was a dictator who jailed/executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived). Yet Taiwan flourished under KMT rule, resulting in the Taiwan Miracle. Only in the 1990s when democracy was introduced to Taiwan, did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest.
    18
  1867. Although our boundaries has changed, modern Chinese civilization has survived the violent course of history, relatively intact, whereas other great ancient civilizations Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt civilization have since fragmented and faded to history. The Chinese written language has also been continuously in use since 1200 BCE, whereas the other great ancient scripts like Sumerian Cuneiform and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are no longer in use.
    18
  1868.  @chrisbell238  You asked: "Name one innovation from China in last three years." 3D Hologram Fans. A company based in eastern China’s Jiangsu province has wowed many online with their holographic fans, which make it seem like images are projected mid-air. Source: South China Morning Post: Phoenix comes to life in mid-air with Chinese-made device
    18
  1869. The U.S talks the walk, while China walks the talk.
    18
  1870.  @ericreed4535  China's universities train more STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) than any other in the world. The Countries with the most STEM graduates (2016) 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,00) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: World Economic Forum This implies that China is going to play a much larger role in those fields.
    18
  1871. I think it's precisely because Russia's national security has been under siege for so long (compared to China's) that Russia has more experience in dealing with NATO, compared to China. China has laid out clear red lines whereas Russia doesn't seem to have as many, maybe that's why NATO thinks that can continue pressuring Russia.
    18
  1872. China's Guangdong province has a significant African population so African policemen in China are needed to deal with the language barrier.
    18
  1873. The eagle is no longer soaring above others, it has to accept a world in which others are its equals.
    18
  1874.  @adhanetkidane  Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice, namely that of the US and its "allies."_
    18
  1875. The threat of a South China Sea blockade is one reason why China is investing in an overland trade route (i.e the Belt and Road Initiative) as an alternative trade route in a maritime blockade scenario.
    18
  1876. Taiwan's ability to hold out stems from (perceived) US support. But it's no secret that the US is in decline while mainland China is rising. As long as peace prevails, the US will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer challenge China's rise, by which then the support for Taiwan will evaporate and reunification remains the only option.
    18
  1877.  @ikongchin3088  Agreed. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today.
    18
  1878.  @andrethorpe6183  Sounds like blueprint was probably born after the Cold War, so he makes light of nuclear war.
    18
  1879. Those atrocities cannot be permitted to continue receiving support from the west.
    18
  1880. Apart from the social credit score, some other foreigners also believe the organ harvesting rumors.
    18
  1881. Next thing you know, Americans will start charging Chinese passers-by using rent as an excuse.
    18
  1882. Wishing you and your family a full and speedy recovery from Covid-19.
    18
  1883. Kishore is ostensibly knowledgeable about ASEAN region, China's system and the US's preconceived view towards China. But in parts of the world like Ukraine and Russia (also Gaza and the Middle East) he tends to follow the Singapore perspective (which follows the Western perspective). Just look at Singaporean media like Channel News Asia and it's largely the same as the West regarding Ukraine and Gaza.
    18
  1884.  @pfemke553  "But Russia did nothing to those countries, except to Ukraine. Ukraine has rich natural resources" Russia is already the world's largest country by landmass, making Russia the richest country in terms of natural resources (both tapped and untapped). They have more land that they even know what to do with, so for what reason would Russia want Ukraine's natural resources? What is known is that Ukraine is the 2nd largest country in Europe (after Russia) and shares a larger border with Russia compared to Latvia's and Estonia's border with Russia. That means a longer border in which NATO can install missiles if Ukraine joins NATO, so that's why Russia is opposed to Ukraine's entry into NATO. As for Crimea, in the 2014 Crimea Referendum, an overwhelming majority (96%) of Crimeans voted to join the Russian Federation.
    18
  1885. Gloria Hahn When is Facebook, Twitter and YouTube illegal in China? Nobody comes to arrest you if you log on to these websites while in China.
    18
  1886.  @koblongata  Tell that to the USA after their drone strike in Kabul killed 10 Afghan civilians (including women and children) and yet the Pentagon says that the U.S General responsible for ordering the drone attack did not violate any laws.
    18
  1887.  @Alex-wp9oo  If they weren't taking steps to avoid civilian, Russian forces would have simply flattened the cities and be over with it, instead Russian forces are proceeding slowly and carefully to avoid unnecessary civilian deaths. Why would they jeopardise all this in Bucha?
    18
  1888.  @oleksii_klochko  Ukraine won't have been invaded, if it didn't apply to join NATO. NATO has been expanding eastwards right up to Russia's doorstep, and is viewed as an existential threat by Russia. Just like how US wouldn't tolerate Soviet missiles deployed to Cuba, Russia will also not tolerate Ukraine joining NATO.
    18
  1889.  @SuperSonic-zz8dx  Western anti-China MSM like CNN or BBC don't want China's digital Renminbi to take flight. They might churn out propaganda like claiming how the communist party is monitoring your digital RMB transactions or something to that effect. But the Chinese bank has already laid down 3 mandates about building a digital currency, one of which is that digital currency has to have some version of anonymity or privacy built into the currency.
    18
  1890.  @anti-chinesecommunistparty864  With a name like Anti-Chinese in your username, you're clearly being anti-China.
    18
  1891.  @MarkYeung1  "I agree with you. China really shouldn't blacklist the US companies in China." That's a hypothetical scenario that hasn't happened, unlike the U.S blacklisting a bunch of Chinese companies. So when you agreed, does that mean you agree the U.S shouldn't do that to Chinese companies?
    18
  1892.  Johan Smid  Why do you keep repeating your denial of these voyages? There exists written records of Zheng He's voyages and accounts by locals in countries he visited. For example, the Taizong Shilu contains 24 short entries for the imperial orders for shipbuilding, with figures pointing to at least 2868 ships, from 1403 to 1419. According to the Taizong shilu 11 July 1405 entry about the dispatch of the fleet, Admiral Zheng He and "others" departed for the first expedition "bearing imperial letters to the countries of the Western Ocean and with gifts to their kings of gold brocade, patterned silks, and colored silk gauze, according to their status." There are also statutes of Zheng He in places that he visited, such as in Stadthuys, Melaka.
    18
  1893.  @Darkademic  "Many don't even understand traditional characters anymore, only simplified." Traditional Chinese characters are still in use in China outside of official use. Traditional Chinese characters can still be used when quoting classical Chinese poetry, in Chinese calligraphy, for old shop signboards, song lyrics. The logos of some schools and universities make use of traditional Chinese script. Simplified Chinese characters are widely used because it is easier to learn and to write. For example, the character 飛 (flying) is simplified to 飞. Also, as long as one knows the different radicals that comprise a particular character and their different forms, then the meaning behind the character can be inferred. There is also no difference in how traditional characters and simplified characters are pronounced out loud.
    18
  1894.  @joelturley4847  China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    18
  1895. It's the story of the Tortoise and the Hare. NATO (Hare) is throwing everything at Russian and into Ukraine, exhausting itself before even reaching the finish line. Russia (Tortoise) has weathered what NATO has thrown at it, yet is still making slow but steady, incremental progress towards the finish line.
    18
  1896.  @TheRishabhkumar  The Indian sore losers are the foolish ones in my opinion, the congratulary ones are the rational Indians.
    18
  1897. If Zelenskyy truly cared about his people, he would surrender in order to minimise the civilian casualties. It's apparent that for all their talk and cheer-leading, NATO won't be sending troops to defend Ukraine. Ukraine's application to join NATO is unlikely to be successful, for this would mean NATO would be obliged to send reinforcements to Ukraine, if it were a member. By refusing to surrender, Zelenskyy is only prolonging the war. By arming civilians with weapons, he's attempting to maximise civilian casualties. By removing age restrictions for conscription, Zelenskyy is effectively enlisting the support of child soldiers to fight and die for his refusal to surrender.
    18
  1898.  @andrenogueira5058  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    18
  1899.  @robertoosido1232  "When people lend their money, no matter how bad they are, you are still good in their eyes." You can tell that to the IMF
    18
  1900.  Charles Schmid  Uighurs in Xinjiang are receiving free education and vocational training, so they can graduate and join the workforce and earn income, but USA is using "Uighur labour" as an excuse to stop Uighurs from being hired and receiving income.
    18
  1901.  @Whatis2468  How many non-Malay Singaporeans are actually fluent in their national language though?
    18
  1902. There are more Chinese restaurants in the United States than American fast food. According to the Chinese American Restaurant Association, there are over 45,000 Chinese restaurants currently in operation across the United States. This number is greater than all the McDonald's, KFCs, Pizza Huts, Taco Bells and Wendy's combined.
    18
  1903. In 1995, NATO agreed that they wouldn't expand eastward towards Russia, yet they've been incorporating former Soviet Union countries like the Baltic states into NATO.
    18
  1904. British political commentator Martin Jacques is another of such individual.
    18
  1905. You seem to singularly blame Trump for America's woes, but he's not the cause of it, he's merely the symptom of growing dissatisfaction in America.
    18
  1906.  @jtf873  They don't have to! That's the beauty of the One Country, Two Systems policy. Mainland China is tolerant enough to allow different political systems to exist within it's borders. If the policy were extended to include Taiwan, then they would be allowed to keep their government, their elections, etc, while being considered fully reunified with mainland China. As far as I know, no other country in the world would tolerate a part of its territory having a different political system, except for China with 1 Country, 2 Systems.
    18
  1907. U.S: "You stole our 6G technology!" China: "Are you sure? Show us your 6G technology for comparison to see if they are the same." U.S: "We don't have it! Because you stole it, now it's no longer with us!" China: "That's not how it works."
    18
  1908.  @fdjw88  It's believed that scientists are approaching the theoretical physical limit of just how small humans can manufacture silicon chips with the current technology. Eventually companies will be unable to make silicon chips any smaller, by which Moore's law might be broken. To solve this, countries like China are investing in alternatives such as carbon-based chips that are actually more efficient than silicon-based chips. If successful, it would render Taiwan's lithography machines practically useless, if carbon chips take off.
    18
  1909. When they can just keep on printing dollars with impunity, eventually the rest of the world will catch on and start dedollarizing.
    18
  1910. Surveys in Russia indicate that President Putin enjoys a high level of approval (around 85%) from the Russian people. Also, gaining territory is a secondary objective, whereas the primary objective of Putin's special military operation is to de-militarize Ukraine, and Russia is achieving this objective. Plus, the Israel-Gaza conflict is a bonus.
    18
  1911. 我们要继续努力，为中国创造更美好的未来。 We must continue our efforts to build a better future for China.
    18
  1912. China is also working on a rail gun mounted on a naval vessel. During testing, China's railgun fired a 124 kg round at a speed of 700 km/h in less than 0.05 seconds. Railgun ammunition are expected to be cheaper than missiles and capable of attaining hypersonic speeds as well, so it could theoretically be used to shoot down hypersonic missiles (given a fast-response targeting system).
    18
  1913.  @chadzahirshah2588  Cyrus' videos promote the peaceful message of Building Bridges, Not Walls between the U.S and China, and if both countries cooperate, the whole world benefits. Isn't this a positive message for the world? Or would you prefer the opposite message, one of war and confrontation?
    18
  1914. The irony is that many Westerners often boast that they have access to information in China, yet they don't know what the reality is like in China.
    18
  1915.  Charles Schmid  President Xi Jinping has shown to be a strong and competent leader, able to guide China effectively through the pandemic crisis, so why can't President Xi remain in power to maximise the benefits to China?
    18
  1916.  @CitsVariants  Is there truly quality of life to enjoy when gas prices in the west are rising, while Russians have access to cheap affordable gas for themselves?
    18
  1917.  Beast Mode  If you boasted that Latin America is your "backyard" that means you support Latin Americans migrating to the United States from the southern border? According to your logic, it's the U.S "backyard" after all, then aren't those people also Americans in your view?
    18
  1918. Russia has yet to make us of their most invincible soldier, General Winter, to pay Western Europe a visit and bring victory for the Russians.
    18
  1919.  ahjotson ahjotson  I wrote a poem too, while listening to music. Like the Great Dragon, we are long-lived. We have seen the rise and fall of others, and yet we remain. We have suffered wars, disasters and invasion. And still we persist on. Like the Great Dragon, we have great wisdom. We respect our elders, for they are a font of knowledge. We worship our ancestors and those before, for history has much to teach us. Like the Great Dragon, we are benevolent. We share our knowledge, our culture, our writing with others. Silk, Jade, Porcelain and Paper, our gifts to the world. Like the Great Dragon, we are humble. We honor our families and teachers, for what are we without their guidance? Humility is a virtue, Confucius says. Give your utmost but take no credit. We are the Descendants of the Dragon. We have much to be proud of our ancestry. And we shall greet the future with resilience and dignity. Video: youtube.com/watch?v=vyuUcTewmBI&lc=Ugg3yFnB2yZC-XgCoAEC
    18
  1920. ​ @INTJ791  "vietnam will be more prosper if conquering cambodia, and vietnam deserve more sea area in east of south vietnam" So you support Vietnam conquering a sovereign country like Cambodia? Cambodia is China's ally, and that's why China intervened in Vietnam for our ally's sake. Also, about the South China Sea, in 1958, the Vietnamese PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese, in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958.
    18
  1921. China wants to make Asia strong by building infrastructure in less developed countries like Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Maldives, Sri Lanka, etc. In fact China always welcome India to participate in Belt and Road Initiative, for mutual progress and development, but India has rejected this offer.
    18
  1922.  @valenrn8657  You said: "By the time the Han dynasty under Emperor Wu (r. 141–87 BC) wrested the western Tarim Basin away from its previous overlords (the Xiongnu)" You've just proven my statement that Xinjiang was part of China even before Jesus Christ himself was born.
    18
  1923. "All warfare is based on deception. When we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive. When attacking a closer target, appear to be aiming for a further objective." - Sun Zi's The Art of War 《孫子兵法》
    18
  1924. Elderly being unable to access medication is regrettable, but can you imagine how worst the situation would be for the elderly, had Shanghai not entered lockdown, and just allowed the virus to spread rampant and claim more lives?
    18
  1925. China seeks win-win cooperation, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    18
  1926.  @ashokjain8449  About Chinese intellect, as the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    18
  1927.  @ashokjain8449  About Education in China, as of 2013, China has also become a top destination for international students, ranking 3rd in the world, according to Institute of International Education. Source: China ranks 3rd among countries that host the most international students, IIE reports usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/2013/10/08/explore-the-worlds-top-universities China is also the most popular destination in Asia for international students, surpassing other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, India, Singapore, etc in sheer number of international students.
    18
  1928.  @ashokjain8449  Why don't you explain why you think Chinese people need to be "rescued" from the establishment? China has lifted 700 million people out of poverty by international standards in just 40 years, whereas the whole rest of the world only lifted 150 million by comparison. Video: Historical achievement: Take 700 million out of poverty youtu.be/CljWffPgmG8 "China has lifted 728 million people out of poverty by international standards. The whole rest of the world has only lifted 152 million." - John Ross, Well-known columnist in UK, Former Deputy mayor of London.
    18
  1929. While some countries priority is to save businesses at the expense of lives, China's priority is to save lives at the expense of businesses.
    18
  1930.  @cryptonite2806  "神州 Shenzhou You can also tslk about Genghis Khan or Roman Empire." Yeah I could do that, but you made the claim that Russia is historical aggressor and occupied more territory from other countries in its history than any other country, which blatantly false, it's the British Empire that occupied more territory from other countries. As the saying goes: "The sun never sets on the British Empire." Ukraine has been supporting ultra-nationalist, neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion that's carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Donbas region. Over the course of 8 years, over 13,000 have been killed in the Donbas region by shelling by both sides and some 814,000 refugees have fled from Donbas to Russia.
    18
  1931.  @HauTran-sunfromsouth  What Brian Berletic is saying is that some Anglo-Saxons come to Asia expecting to be showered with adoration by the locals. But when the locals no longer treat them this way, they become spiteful against their host country. Examples include: serpentza and laowhy.
    18
  1932. USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    18
  1933. After watching Brian's videos about how deep the NED roots go, whenever I hear news of new protests/uprising I found that it's usually NED's doing.
    18
  1934. China is also blessed with good leadership, making 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans to map out China's future. Our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. Whereas the U.S Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only make short-term plans, instead of long-term plans spanning, say 10 years for America's future
    18
  1935. Yes. Usually those reports of social media's leaking user information stem from unregulated Western media like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, etc.
    18
  1936. +Nikola Tasev Regarding US exceptionalism, I would like to add that the United States withdrew from International Court of Justice in 1986 and will only accept the court's jurisdiction only on a case-by-case basis. Sounds hypocritical, coming from a country that promotes human rights.
    17
  1937. +Angolin Chinese characters may be difficult to write but it suits China's needs just fine. It's a pictorial language that unites the different dialects of China. Other countries are free to drop the language at any time. China is probably one of the few countries where other nations visit in order to learn the written language. Most of the time foreign languages are forced onto natives by conquest (e.g. English, Spanish etc)
    17
  1938.  @obeybigbro9568  Territory lost can always be recaptured later. But Russian soldiers lives lost cannot be recovered. In a war of attrition the lives of soldiers are far more important that holding onto territory.
    17
  1939.  @Roneck888  The Hare's exhaustion is evident by the diminishing amounts of aid that NATO is sending to Ukraine, even before reaching the finish line.
    17
  1940.  @JackRichardsonM8  Imperialist? When it's NATO that has been expanding right up to Russia's doorstep?
    17
  1941. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking ahead by 1 move. Russia is playing Chess, thinking ahead by 5 moves. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋) thinking ahead by 10 moves.
    17
  1942. Yeah, some Hong Kong protestors could be seen waving United States Flag 🇺🇲 and United Kingdom Flag 🇬🇧 among the crowds, yet where are these countries now in their hour of need?
    17
  1943. The communist forces were smaller in number than that of the KMT, so they made use of guerrilla tactics suitable for fighting against a more numerous opponent. Mao Zedong had read Sun Zi's The Art of War 孙子兵法 and made extensive use of its strategies when facing off with a larger, well-organized opponent.
    17
  1944.  @geoeconomics5629  Care to elaborate which of my statements you think is wrong?
    17
  1945.  @MarkYeung1  When Hong Kong became a British colony, the local people's minds were colonized as well. The "colonial mentality" is a form of "mental enslavement" that colonizers shackle onto the minds of the colonized, forcing them to think a certain way towards their colonial masters and harbor disdain towards other cultures (including their own). Just like how former colonies physically decolonized, there needs to be a "decolonization of the mind" as well. To decolonize your mind, you need to learn to recognize the colonizer's intent pervading your thoughts and guiding your actions. We need emancipate ourselves from mental slavery, for though others may free the body, none but ourselves can free the mind.
    17
  1946.  @ThatBigBlackClock  The withdrawal of Russian forces from the Kyiv region is a gesture of goodwill to create favourable conditions for Russia-Ukraine talks, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov.
    17
  1947.  @rc666  It's the clown actor of Kiev that you should be worried about.
    17
  1948.  @MarkYeung1  "China has cost the riots in Hong Kong by imposing the extradition agreement." The Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now since scrapped) was initially proposed because a Hong Kong man (named Chan) had strangled his pregnant girlfriend (named Poon) to death in Taiwan, and flew back to Hong Kong, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Taiwan wanted to extradite this Hong Kong murderer to face justice, but Hong Kong realized that they don't have an existing extradition treaty. Chan has since confessed, but since the crime occurred outside of Hong Kong, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to convict Chan of murder, that's why the Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the Extradition Bill to cover up this legal loophole. So how did mainland China caused the riots in Hong Kong? Now that the Extradition bill has been scrapped, a Hong Kong murderer roams free, and there's no justice for the victim's family.
    17
  1949. Leilu Dai USA only fought Japan for 3 years (1942-1945) with the help of Chinese forces. Whereas China fought Japan for 14 years (1931-1945) with 11 years (1931-1942) alone without Western aid and 3 years (1942-1945) with US help. And USA was fresh to the fight, but both China and Japan had already been weakened after fighting each other for over a decade.
    17
  1950. Iran and North Korea could also qualify for having sovereignty.
    17
  1951.  @Nesher92  Well, where does it say that Taiwan is independent then? Where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? If not, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution, since there is no declaration of independence from Taiwan.
    17
  1952.  @Nesher92  Both Taiwan and mainland China agree that Taiwan is part of China under the One China policy. China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    17
  1953.  @Nesher92  About your so-called claims of "innocent taiwanese", why did Chiang kai-shek and the Kuomintang butchered communists peasants and started the whole Chinese Civil War? Why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. This demonstrates KMT's *gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland.
    17
  1954. She is Western feminist SJW trying to push her own agenda in China.
    17
  1955. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi "围棋"), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    17
  1956. It's going to be a nightmare for logistics to maintain a ragtag Ukrainian Army consisting of Soviet weapon-trained soldiers armed with outdated NATO weapons, tanks, howitzers, and insufficient ammo and fuel resupplies.
    17
  1957. Trump had even praised China's efforts and transparency regarding the coronavirus. Source: Trump praises China 'efforts and transparency' on Wuhan virus straitstimes.com/world/united-states/trump-praises-china-efforts-and-transparency-on-wuhan-virus
    17
  1958.  @中華傲訣  One thing about Singapore's government is that they are the only South East Asian/ASEAN country to have slapped sanctions against Russia (thus earning Singapore a place on Russia's list of unfriendly countries). It just doesn't seem like a good move for the country to take such a stance.
    17
  1959.  @tottiwulezhou  You said: " 1. Tell animals that animals living in other farms have even worse life." Yes, that's precisely what Americans have been told their entire lives, that everyone in the rest of the world is worst off than America, and that only America is great and everyone wants to come live in the USA. "2. Arrest the leaders of animal protestors." Exactly, that's what happens in USA when people like Julian Assange and Edward Snowden speak out against American tyranny. "3. Give extra meals to a few numbers of animals and then make them animals representatives who will act to vote." Yes, that's basically corruption disguised as "lobbying" inside the USA, where the rich U.S corporations fund the election campaigns of candidates that will promote corporate interests at the expense of ordinary American taxpayers. "4. Pay money to a few YouTube influencers to conduct propaganda for the farm." Yeah, that's what serpentza and laowhy86 are basically, being paid to spread fear and paranoia towards China. Even the Western MSM basically demonized China and Australian "think tanks" like ASPI (Australia Strategic Policy Institute) are funded by actual "tank-makers"(i.e the Military Industrial Complex) to spread fear and paranoia of China to their audiences. "5. Make the patriotism education mandatory to all animals, and choose to love the farm or to be punished." That's why many Americans shout patriotic slogans like "America First!", "Make America Great Again" and "God Bless the United States", and anyone who even says anything remotely positive about China is automatically labelled as a communist party shill.
    17
  1960. In China, the Chinese government controls the Chinese corporations for the benefit of China, reining in corporations when they strayed too far. In the United States however, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    17
  1961.  @ColoniaMurder20  "European Colonizer described indigenous people in Formosa Island as known as Taiwan today were Malay Race." But new archaeological studies have revealed that the current Taiwan aborigines are descended from farmers from mainland China, who arrived on the island some 5,000 years ago. The Dapenkeng culture sites revealed that the inhabitants cultivated rice and millet, and most scholars believe this culture is not derived from the Changbin culture, but was brought across the Strait by the ancestors of today's Taiwanese aborigines, speaking early Austronesian languages. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan)
    17
  1962. According to WTO website: Disputes by Members, US and EU have the top number of cases. US has 124 cases as complainant and 157 cases as respondent. EU has 110 cases as complainant and 92 cases as respondent. China has 23 cases as complainant and 49 cases as respondent. Indonesia only has 13 cases as complainant and 15 cases as respondent. ... (So if anything, it looks like US and EU violate WTO rules far more regularly than China and Indonesia.)
    17
  1963.  @IbrahimNgeno  Probably because the molten salt technology is still rather new, or perhaps solar panels are there to supplement solar power production during the day. At any rate, when the Sun goes down, the solar panels stopped producing power, while the molten salt is still able to generate electricity at night.
    17
  1964.  @peternebether8588  Germany doesn't even have Nord Stream.
    17
  1965. Meanwhile, EU Foreign Policy chief, Josep Borrell, says that Taiwan is essential for Europe.
    17
  1966. Doe Australia actually have the necessary facilities to maintain nuclear submarines? Where will they get the nuclear fuel for their subs without violated Nuclear Non-Proliferation?
    17
  1967.  Gaylord Manlove  The USA accuse mainland China of potentially abusing the Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now scrapped), then USA turn around and abuse their own extradition bill with Canada with Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou. The USA accuse China of potentially abusing extradition bill, then they turn around and abuse their extradition bill with Canada themselves. The sheer irony!
    17
  1968.  @raeconteur  Yes I am Chinese. I'm here because Cyrus' channel predominantly focuses on China-US issues. I think what you said about people outside the west and middle east is generally true, since we are usually more concerned with issues affecting our local region. But when huge conflicts like Gaza and Russia-Ukraine dominate the news, then people start to learn about them. I honestly didn't know much of Russia-Ukraine issues until Feb 2022, then I start to read up on it and form my opinion. Same goes for Gaza.
    17
  1969. The next few years are going to be crucial for China. It's no secret that the U.S is in decline and China is rising, so there's this short window (until 2025-2028) where America could potentially sabotage China's economic growth through a short, controlled conflict in Asia. China mustn't get distracted by US provocations and sucked into a pointless war. As long as peace prevails in the next few years, China will eventually cross this dangerous threshold, until US declines to the point where they can't afford to challenge China anymore. Time and patience is on China's side.
    17
  1970. People like him tend to think other countries are incapable of inherent progress and innovation, and that any development has to come from the western colonization of those territories.
    17
  1971. In a poll of nearly 7500 readers by the United Daily News (Taiwan Newspaper) website, 61 percent said Pelosi's trip was not welcome as it may destabilise the Taiwan Strait. Only 38 percent welcomed the visit and said it had more advantages than disadvantages.
    17
  1972.  @laserraiset3300  "神州 Shenzhou you just cried for dollar is printed currency, but when trillions printed yuans is not big deal ?" That's because China cannot issue Yuan with impunity, and there are factors to consider like China's economy, gold reserves, and how each printed note could devalue the Yuan. Whereas the U.S is not bound by such considerations when they print money.
    17
  1973. Beware the US who speaks with a forked tongue
    17
  1974. Meanwhile President Trump defends Saudi Arabian Crown Prince from his involvement in murder of journalist.
    17
  1975.  @Rubbersofree  Sri Lanka's debt is owned by market borrowings (39%), Asian Development Bank (14%), Japan (12%), World Bank (11%), China (10%), India (2%) and others (11%) according to the Sri Lanka Ministry of Finance. So how is it the CPC's fault that Sri Lanka become bankrupt? 90% of Sri Lanka's debt is owned by the West (including Japan and India).
    17
  1976.  @ryanwalters6184  "chinese can barely buy land in china." Today China is a country of homeowners with more than 90% of households owning homes (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations (Huang et al., 2020). ... (Source: National Library of Medicine)
    17
  1977.  @tooltalk  If you look up the 1898 Treaty of Paris that Spain signed with the U.S, the Spratly Islands is not Philippine territory. Philippine's national boundaries were drawn up in that treaty and it did not include the Spratly Islands.
    17
  1978. Pre-1917 Russia was arguably the poorest in Europe, dominated by peasants with only 15% of the population in towns and less than 10% worked in industry. Tsarist Russia was also technologically backward compared to advanced capitalist countries like Great Britain and Germany. But after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest in Europe, both economically as well as militarily. Soviet Union was ranked the second largest economy in the world after the USA, and the Soviets even made advances in science and technology, even launching the world's first satellite, Sputnik, into orbit. Such an ideology transformed Russia from arguably the poorest in Europe into its strongest as the Soviet Union.
    17
  1979. Using Winnie the Pooh (a yellow bear with small eyes) to refer to a Chinese man, is borderline racist in itself.
    17
  1980. George Yeo himself was asked by reporters if Singapore would like to join this Chinese commonwealth, to which he replied "never in the political sense." Turns out that he himself rejects this idea for his own country, so I seriously doubt mainland China or Taiwan will agree to this idea. Like you said, 1 Country, 2 Systems is still the preferred course of action for reunification.
    17
  1981.  @eliotanderson6554  You talk about Han supremacy or domination in China, but have you seen how the Hindu in India behave?
    17
  1982. Hong Kong was stolen from China by the British. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken and made into British colony, to act as drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even after Britain renounced ownership over it's former colonies, Hong Kong wasn't even fully returned back to China.
    17
  1983. Ukraine had been supporting ultra-nationalist, neo-Nazis like Azov Battalion carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Lugansk and some 13,000 people have been killed over the course of 8 years by shelling by both sides. The Minsk Agreement was meant to stop the fighting, include a ceasefire, facilitate withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, and institute constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas. But the Minsk Agreement wasn't honored. Russia is not starting a war, they are putting an end to one that being since the 2014 coup d'etat of Ukrainian President Yanukoyvch by the USA and installing their own U.S puppets in Kiev.
    17
  1984. ABo MALA You think population size is the only factor here? If so, then the world's 2nd most populous country, India, should be ranked 1st or 2nd, instead of 60th, don't you agree?
    17
  1985.  @andrenogueira5058  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, back when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporate those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Tibet broke free of China in 1912 due to civil strife, but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951, so why should China give up territory that was historically part of China?
    17
  1986.  @jamesmorrow1646  The Minsk Accords were not honored by the west, and Putin had found that his words had fallen on deaf ears in the west, which is why he finally decided to act.
    17
  1987. There highschool kids haven't even graduated from school, yet they already think they know how to best govern Hong Kong? Their teenage minds haven't even matured and they haven't stepped out into the real working world of adults, yet they already gotten swept up by idealistic political fervor.
    17
  1988. Every country has their own sensitive topics. For example, it is illegal to display the the Nazi Swastika flag in Germany, France, Austria, etc outside of historical context. Even in former Soviet Union countries, like Ukraine, Lithuania, etc, it is illegal to display the Communist Hammer and Sickle flag. So China is no different in this regard.
    17
  1989.  FREEHONGKONG-yn5ij  Even Western diplomats admit that decoupling is impossible, which is why they avoid using that term.
    17
  1990. Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands (just ask the expats here). However, it's sad that many Westerners (but not all) are seemingly regarding Chinese in their lands as unwelcome
    17
  1991.  @ironlionzion1380  Taiwan island inalienable part of China.
    17
  1992.  @MarkYeung1  I hope more people from Hong Kong learn to "decolonize their mind" and free themselves from the remnant "colonial mentality" that their British colonial masters impose on their minds. Such people need to recognise the colonizer's ideas pervading their thoughts and influencing their words and actions, only then can they finally free themselves from foreign imperialism.
    17
  1993. United States: "China is taking over other countries' infrastructure!" Also, United States: "Panama's canal belongs to the USA!"
    17
  1994. Meanwhile, NATO countries have been pouring lethal aid into Ukraine in order to prolong what appears to be a losing war. Those weapons such as stinger missiles and rocket launchers are going to end up on the Black Market, once the war is over, and they might fall into the hands of disillusioned Ukraine ultra-nationalists who might use them to shoot down EU civilian airplanes, due to perceived abandonment of Ukraine by NATO.
    17
  1995. The USA isn't even a signatory to the International Court of Justice (ICJ. After the court ruled that the United States's covert war against Nicaragua was in violation of international law (Nicaragua v. United States), the United States withdrew from compulsory jurisdiction in 1986 to accept the court's jurisdiction only on a discretionary basis. That means that USA can choose to ignore compulsory ruling by the ICJ on a case-by-case basis.
    17
  1996. Agreed. I used to think random uprisings were just random uprisings. But now the first thing that comes to my mind is "What is NED sponsoring this time?"
    17
  1997. "Reducing everything to 'democracy vs dictatorship' is just lazy and simplistic" Agreed. Ukraine most certainly isn't a democracy. Freedom House (a nonpartisan think tank that ranks democracies) has labeled Ukraine “a transitional or hybrid regime”. The Economist Intelligence Unit, has also pegged Ukraine as a “hybrid regime.”
    17
  1998.  @MarkYeung1  The problem arises when those Asian Americans get treated as "perpetual foreigners" even when they've been born and bred in the USA. Some of such people of Asian descent spend their entire lives trying to fit in with America the place they are born, but still face rejection from their fellow Americans because of their skin color.
    17
  1999. Some believe that the hegemonic decline began much earlier, perhaps during Trump or Obama era.
    17
  2000.  @fcl3294  He's living in M'sia, short form for Malaysia not in China. He even said "imported China veggies, fruits, etc compared to imported Australian veggies, so he's comparing the prices of imported China and Australian produce in Malaysia.
    17
  2001.  @educateyourself3872  That's because you lack sense.
    17
  2002. The Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again, which government body is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, India, Europe and USA. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China), the world's 3rd largest arms exporter, having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army and funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it had been achieved under CCP leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success.
    17
  2003. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world, dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US and its "allies".)
    17
  2004. Russia and China seek win-win cooperation, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    17
  2005. They call it the "International Space Station," yet Chinese scientists are not allowed on the ISS. Space exploration should be available for all of mankind. Even Russian cosmonauts can be on the ISS, but not Chinese taikonauts (i.e Chinese astronauts). So in the end, China built its own space station.
    17
  2006.  @Darkademic  "why you think "civilizational continuity" is a good thing to begin with. Something being old or continuous doesn't make it good, it just makes it.. old." The continuity of a civilization represents a way of thinking that has persisted for centuries (and in China's case, for millennia). For such a way of thinking, to have survived the oftentimes violent passage of time is certainly a remarkable feat, and deserves to be studied as to where it is successful and where it is not. Even in the realm of politics, for such a governing system as China's to have survived for so long means that it's works and it's able to adapt to new challenges.
    17
  2007. Ancient China invented paper currency, and gradually the rest of the world followed suit. Now China has launched digital currency, it's only a matter of time for the rest of the world to follow.
    17
  2008. 我们要继续努力，为中国创造更美好的未来。🇨🇳 We must continue our efforts to build a better future for China. 🇨🇳
    17
  2009. American diplomats like Jake Sullivan and Anthony Blinken have shown to be "undiplomatic" towards China, it's no reason to think that American MSN journalists are otherwise.
    17
  2010.  @koblongata  Haven't you heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending money on your tourist industry? In 2019, China was top in the world in outbound tourism, seeing a record high of 150 million overseas trips made by people in China according to China Tourism Academy. Even in international students, in 2019, around 703,500 Chinese students left China to pursue overseas studies. The number increased by 6.25 percent compared to the previous year and makes China the largest country of origin for international students in the world. So what makes you think Chinese lack freedoms when we can literally be found all over the globe? You said: "People were repressed and hundreds of thousands got killed by Saddam simply because they said something wrong, and don't forget Saddam was an invasive dictator." Well, the U.S's buddy, Saudia Arabia is a dictatorship under their monarchy, and the Saudi Arabian crown prince had murdered a reporter (named Khashoggi) and yet USA just close one eye and look in the other direction. As for Saddam, former President Bush had suspected Iraq of harboring Weapons of Mass Destruction, but after the Iraq War, no WMDs were ever found in Iraq. Meanwhile, Iraq Body Count has recorded the deaths of some 200,000 Iraqi civilians as a result of the U.S invasion of Iraq. Yet you still claim China is a threat to global peace and stability, when here the USA has been waging wars in the Middle East? How does your logic make sense? As for Afghanistan, the U.S democratic experiment has failed in Afghanistan, after spending nearly 20 years and pouring trillions of dollars into the Afghan war effort. The democratically elected Afghan President Ghani had abandoned his country with carloads of U.S cash, and the 300,000-member strong Afghan Army had surrendered to the Taliban in just weeks with minimal resistance. The U.S even abandoned billions of dollars of military equipment that have fallen into Taliban hands. If anything, this shows that the U.S can't just force democracy onto other countries, and expect the people to want to adopt U.S governing system.
    17
  2011. If the leader has shown to be capable of leading the country, then I personally see no problem with leaving him in power, in order to maximise the benefits to China. The government is reviving the old "Mandate of Heaven" doctrine, where a competent leader is allowed to stay in power to work his policies, while an incompetent leader will eventually be overthrown by rebellion. This political doctrine has guided Imperial China for thousands of years.
    17
  2012.  @peterwairua8240  "Please inform just how much of Sir Lanka debt China holds" Here's the breakdown of Sri Lanka's debt: -39% Market Borrowings -14% Asian Development Bank -12% Japan -11% World Bank -10% China -3% India -11% Other ... Yet why does Western MSM try to pin the blame on China for Sri Lanka's debt woes?
    17
  2013.  @drmodestoesq  Previously, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong while they were a British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's 1997 handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, where they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    17
  2014. China is the world's leading country in electricity production from renewable energy sources, with over double the generation of the second-ranking country, the United States. China's renewable energy sector is growing faster than its fossil fuels and nuclear power capacity. China is the largest producer of Solar Energy and the current largest photovoltaic power station in the world is the 850 MW Longyangxia Dam Solar Park in Qinghai, China. Source:Wikipedia: Solar Power wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power China is the largest producer of Wind energy and the Gansu Wind Farm in China is the largest onshore wind farm in the world Source:Wikipedia Wind Power wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power China built the world's largest hydroelectric dam the Three Gorges Dam making China the largest producer of hydroelectric energy Source:Wikipedia Hydroelectricity wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroelectricity
    17
  2015.  @niewazneniewazne1890  The difference is that China is granting autonomy to various parts of China like Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, etc, but here the US is making bold and blatant statements about autonomy over another country, France.
    17
  2016. China has preserved the Mongolian script in Inner Mongolia, while the people in (Outer) Mongolia use the Cyrillic script today instead of the Mongolian script.
    17
  2017. Singapore too also still have a long way to go.
    17
  2018. Even if granted independence, the colonial mentality means that the people's mind remain enslaved. Decolonization of the Philippines will not be complete without the decolonization of the people's minds.
    17
  2019. Actually, China don't really want the top spot. Its a tiring, taxing and thankless position to be in. 2nd place is probably the Goldilocks Spot - not too powerful, not too weak.
    17
  2020. Here's an analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Lugansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    17
  2021. @Ben Benito Have you seen Huawei's Mate Xs design? It's a unique foldable phone design that folds outwards instead of inwards unlike other foldable phone designs.
    17
  2022. @Ben Benito Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought.
    17
  2023. @Ben Benito China launched world's first quantum satellite Micius (墨子), that allowed two stations on the ground to communicate at 1,200 km (750 mi) – further than any experiment to date.
    17
  2024. Agreed. The West is free to compare test scores with each other, but China's goals are set by ourselves and we should strive to achieve it regardless of how the West feels about it.
    17
  2025. Whatever your own personal views about Putin, there's no denying that he's making Russia great again, whether it's falling unemployment levels or increasing economic growth, and that's why many Russians continue to support him as a leader. But you can't really say the same for how Westerners feel about their own leaders.
    17
  2026.  @AbdulPAK  Chinese call Pakistani our iron brother (巴铁) because our bond is as strong as iron.
    17
  2027. Nobody force your people to buy Chinese goods and creating the huge demand in the first place. Chinese people work hard to manufacture smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, clothing, sneakers, so that inflation is kept to a minimum and the cost of living in other countries is lower than it should be. Think of all the money you people have saved over the years on living expenses, thanks to affordable Chinese goods.
    17
  2028. Also, Prof Martin Jacques and Prof Zhang Weiwei.
    17
  2029. China invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) that have revolutionized their respective fields. Paper and Printing helped spread knowledge. The Compass made navigation under difficult weather conditions much easier. And Gunpowder has revolutionized warfare.
    17
  2030. +Allan Kamen Actually, the government only ban 20 or so Muslim names. But since 1967, Indonesian government (world's largest Muslim population country) banned every Chinese name and force Indonesian Chinese to adopt Indonesian-sounding names. Expressions of Chinese culture through language, religion, and traditional festivals in Indonesia were also banned. So you think Muslims haven't done the same to Chinese populations elsewhere as well? Muslims in China only have 20 fewer names to select from, whereas Chinese Indonesians don't even get to pick a single Chinese name at all. According to following source, Ramadan was celebrated this year (July 2017) with many Muslims praying at Mosques, including Huxi mosque in Shanghai. The mosque were so packed that the faithful spilled out into the streets. After morning prayers, they went to the many halal shops and restaurants located nearby for a bite. Ramadan conclusion celebrated by Muslims across China dailymailnews.com/2017/07/01/ramadan-conclusion-celebrated-by-muslims-across-china-2/
    17
  2031. Indeed. Japan owns more of Sri Lanka's debt than China.
    17
  2032. Russia refers to these encircling tactics as building "cauldrons", with an initial opening (for civilians to evacuate) before finally closing the circle, putting the lid on, and turning up the heat inside.
    17
  2033. The video also chose to include India and other US allies, but neglect to even mention Russia (which supports any country that opposes USA) I mean, the uploader should either consider all possible allies, or else choose not to consider them at all in this scenario. It just makes your video appear biased to one side that's all.
    17
  2034.  @constellation35  Jack Ma is good when he puts the interests of others before himself (like when he uploaded Covid-19 guidebook to share information on Covid-19 with everyone) but when Jack Ma starts putting his own self-interests and those of his company, over the interests of Chinese people, then Jack Ma needs to be taken down a notch.
    17
  2035. Even Australian PM Scott Morrison took a holiday while Australian fire-fighters were battling wildfires.
    17
  2036. North Korea is only trying to prevent US troops from invading its territories that's all. Everyone, include Kim himself, knows that N. Korea will be annihilated the moment it launches a real attack on US territory. Why continue to provoke and pressure the country when the only casualties are North Korean citizens? North Korea always target US military bases in South Korea and Okinawa Japan, so not USA try withdraw troops from these territories instead? If the same method doesn't work, why not try different approach instead?
    17
  2037. +Chirm Music The Americans copied German technology. At the start of WWII, American tanks were largely inferior to German tanks, but after Nazi surrender, Americans absorbed German Panzer (Tank) technology and that's why American tanks are so powerful today. The Nazi Airforce (Luftwaffe) had such successful aircraft designs that Americans incorporated those designs into their planes. Even Nazi V2 Rocket Scientists were put to work during the NASA Moon missions. One of the greatest ripoffs of all time was the US theft of German patents after WWII Source: wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/patents.html
    17
  2038. Pakistan is a sovereign country (as recognized by India) and China is helping develop Pakistan's economy through economic corridor. People join terrorists because they are poor, jobless or angry at their government or USA and so on. Building up Pakistan's economy will help more people find jobs, and then the terrorists will have less recruits for their cause, since people now want to work to make Pakistan better. But US's solution to terrorism is to bomb the countries in Middle East, inevitably killing civilians and fueling anger for the victims to join the terrorist cause. If one terrorist group is destroyed, another pops up to take its place. Al Qaeda was originally trained by CIA to fight terrorists, but they deflected and become terrorists because they saw the damage USA was doing to their countries. The rise of ISIL can also be attributed to US constant intervention in Middle East. America has been fighting wars in Middle East for over 15 years with no end in sight (even till today). Why not try different approach instead, like what China is doing? Its crazy to think that repeating the same method again and again, will solve the whole issue of terrorism.
    17
  2039. "If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you do read the newspaper, you're misinformed." - Mark Twain
    17
  2040.  @bibimbapbutt2072  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china
    17
  2041.  @gulamog5041  Taiwan needs freedom and independence from U.S foreign interference, that's what it really needs.
    17
  2042.  @ColoniaMurder20  Many Filipinos (but not all) tend to have the "colonial mentality," of worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture while harboring a distaste for any "non-white" culture (including their own). Did you forget the American-Phillipine war in which hundreds of thousands of Filipinos died fighting for freedom from the U.S, but lost overall and Philippines became an American colony?
    17
  2043.  @Esquera123  "I think you should go back to kindergarten. No one said about quantity. I said America is the world. I mean about quality. Does the 8 billion people have high tech industry?" Even kindergarteners know what the world is, it's all the people on the Earth. That is 8 billion people, not America's population of 300 million, how does that make America the world? I think you should heed your own advice and go back to kindergarten to learn what the world is. It's certainly not America alone.
    17
  2044. Many Chinese are impressed when a Westerner speaks our language. But as a Chinese, I speak to Westerners in English and nobody is impressed……
    17
  2045. Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out stems from perceived U.S support. But as long as peace prevails, the U.S will decline to the point where they are no longer able to challenge mainland China's rise, in which Taiwan's backing would evaporate, and reunification becomes inevitable. Time is on China's side.
    17
  2046.  @everythingandmore5537  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    17
  2047.  @Falsificationpondering  Had Bhutan wanted neutrality, they would have allowed embassies from both neighbors, China and India, instead of just the Indian embassy. Also, the fact that you take into consideration the views from your southern neighbor, while ignoring those of your northern neighbor, just goes to show that Bhutanese sovereignty doesn't truly exist, you're just following what the West wants out of Bhutan, i.e to contain China's rise and Asia's rise.
    17
  2048.  @ashokjain8449  Could you elaborate why you think Chinese people need to be "rescued" from the Communist Party establishment? China's political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then why do you believe Chinese people need to be "rescued"?
    17
  2049.  @ashokjain8449  Beating around the bush? Why don't you explain exactly what's wrong with China's system that you think Chinese people need "rescuing"? China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China is world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china And It's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. So why do you think Chinese people need "rescuing" you tell me?
    17
  2050. Americans (especially the poor) have the capability to be just as hardworking, but it's just that their government is more focused on maintaining hegemonic rule, than on tackling domestic issues at home.
    17
  2051.  @ji8698  Of course anyone who's studied history would know the result. And it looks like Zelensky might soon be joining the likes of Napoleon and Hilter.
    17
  2052. I hope that Eileen Gu's example not only inspires more Chinese athletes to take up winter sports here in China, but to also inspire oversea Chinese and people of Chinese descent to be proud of their motherland. She truly deserves her gold medal.
    17
  2053.  Dark Clouds  If Zelenskyy truly cared about the lives of Ukrainians, he would have surrendered Ukraine by now, instead of using them as a human shield. It's axiomatic by now that for all their talk, the USA and it's NATO puppets aren't going to send troops to defend Ukraine nor put a no-fly zone over Ukraine. Ukraine's application to join NATO is unlikely to be successful, because it would mean NATO is obliged to send reinforcements to defend Ukraine, and I can't see that happening. After years of encouragement by NATO to join, Ukraine has been literally abandoned (as in Zelenskyy's own words) by NATO, so the best course of action right now is for Ukraine to surrender.
    17
  2054.  @heli3574  Agreed. Here's Jimmy Kimmel show asking Americans on the street "Can You Name a Country? Any Country?" youtu.be/kRh1zXFKC_o
    17
  2055. They have been conditioned to expect that the US will always continue to support them, even though US has a history of abandoning vassals.
    17
  2056.  @Arnsteel634  This is where China and the US differ. China regards economic growth, poverty alleviation and unity as its priority, whereas the U.S regards democracy, human rights and freedom. But can it fill their stomachs?
    17
  2057. Billy K How is Chinese Writing system strange? In the past, Chinese characters were logograms, similar to ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs, only that Chinese language has evolved and been simplified over the years. Here are some examples: 日(Sun) + 月(Moon) = 明 (Bright or Tomorrow, after a day and night) 日(Sun) + 木(Tree) = 東 (East, the Sun rising behind a tree) 田(Field) + 木(Tree) = 果 (Fruit, the "havest" of the tree) 人(Man) + 木(Tree) = 休 (Rest, Man resting under a tree) 木(Tree) + 木(Tree) = 林 (Forest) 木(Tree) + 爫(A grasping hand) = 采 (Picking up or plucking something)
    17
  2058.  @willchu  On Chinese social media, there are discussions on what to do after Taiwan reunification with the mainland, and there's talk about Taiwan's army becoming a Taiwan branch of the People's Liberation Army and participating in naval patrols.
    17
  2059. Why BBC change the meaning of the word 未来 to mean democracy?
    17
  2060.  @nakim1200  Most likely. If the DPP separatists want to declare independence, then they should get off the Chinese territory of Taiwan and find some other plot of land to claim for themselves. Because Taiwan is an in alianable part of China.
    17
  2061. Exactly. It's like the West accusing China of "cultural genocide", yet here the Western media feature an Uighur dressed in well-made tailored suit.
    17
  2062.  @yesterdaystech86  Russia is winning on the military, economic, and political fronts, only losing on the media front that's all.
    17
  2063. Chinese is definitely not inferior to Korean. Let me give some examples. 子 -> Child, 老 -> Old man, So 孝 -> Filial (Child supporting Elder) If we add 文 -> Culture, we get 教 -> Teach (Elder talking to Child about Culture) Also, 日 -> Sun, 月 -> Moon, So 明 -> Tomorrow (After 1 Day and 1 Night) Add 日 into 木 -> Tree, and we get 東 -> East (Direction Sun rises through a Tree) Add 田 -> rice field, above 木 -> Tree and we get 果 -> Fruit (Harvest of the Tree) 火 -> Fire, while 灭 -> Extinguish (Cover Fire and it will die out). Characters can be paired to form new words. 后 -> After. Add Fruit 果 and 后果 -> Consequences ( "fruits of labor") Fructose in Chinese is 果糖 (lit. "Fruit Sugar") Anime is 动漫 (lit."Moving Comics") Satellite is 卫星 (lit."Protective Star") Extinction is 灭绝(lit."Extinguish Completely") Finally, Chinese recycles ancient characters and puts them to modern use. 笔 -> Brush, consists of 毛 -> Hair and 竹(on top) -> Bamboo The Ancient Chinese Brush which is made from bamboo and horse hair. Chinese still uses 笔 to represent modern writing instruments. 网 -> Fishing Net or Web. In modern society it also means Inter(net) or World Wide (Web). Website is 网站(lit. Web Post). 車 -> Chariot. Ancient Chinese battles were similar to the ancient Egyptian's. Nowadays 車 is used for cars and other vehicles. 火車(lit."Fire Chariot") -> Train Plenty of other things and ideas can be expressed by Chinese. It is a language that has evolved from the ancient hieroglyphic writing style to its present form. Of course one of its difficulties is in pronouncing the words. But my Chinese teacher used to say "Sounds change, words remain." Ancient Mandarin probably sounds different from modern Mandarin but the words still have the same meaning. That's why Kanji is exists.
    16
  2064. Western double standards, they accuse China of doing wrong, when they themselves have done the same. I remember the USA accusing China of potentially abusing the Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now scrapped) yet USA turn around and abuse their own extradition bill with Canada through the Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou case. The sheer irony of USA accusing China of doing what they themselves are doing.
    16
  2065.  @fortunatomartino9797  Even on land, the Han Chinese weren't very expansionist. If you compare the maps of Han-ruled China (such as Song Dynasty and Ming Dynasty), they were much smaller in size than the foreign-ruled Chinese dynasties like Yuan Dynasty (Mongol) and Qing Dynasty (Manchu).
    16
  2066.  @andrejsurdevics6476  Because like I said, Russian forces withdrew from Kiev in the early days of the special military operation as a gesture of goodwill, in order to facilitate peace talks. That's why Russian forces are no longer near Kiev.
    16
  2067. I used to watch serpentza's earlier videos about China, showing both the positive and negative aspects of China in a balanced manner. However, he changed over the years and serpentza's latest videos about China have been largely negative in nature.
    16
  2068. Some overseas Chinese adopt a "colonial mentality" of worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture while harboring disdain for any "non-white" culture (including their own).
    16
  2069.  @MarkYeung1  "You mean as Chinese I should invade Ukraine?" Honestly, you're disgracing Chinese all over the world with your poorly thought out words. You may be Chinese, but China's official stance has always been to support peace in Ukraine. For example, China has put forth a 12-point peace process for a peaceful resolution in Ukraine. Putin has welcomed this idea, while the USA has rejected this peace process. What has you being Chinese even got to do with this?
    16
  2070. Most Chinese kids dream of becoming an astronaut when they grow up. Most US and UK kids dream of becoming a YouTuber when they grow up.
    16
  2071. Honestly speaking, most Americans can't even point out where Taiwan island is on the world map, yet the US government is making Taiwan one of their core issue?
    16
  2072.  charlie  If you're claiming that Cyrus is somehow paid by the Chinese government, then for what reason did he include a sponsor in his video?
    16
  2073.  ཧྲི་ TIBET  You said: "Tibetans are very distinctly different from the Chinese." If you're talking about physical appearances alone, we aren't that distinct. I mean, the 14th Dalai Lama actually looks like a elderly Chinese gentleman at a glance, if he was wearing ordinary clothing instead of his usual Tibetan robes.
    16
  2074. President Trump is unilaterally imposing tariffs on steel and aluminium, without even going through the proper WTO channels, so what negotiation is there? Why not go through the proper WTO channels instead of just deciding to slap tariffs like that?
    16
  2075. Since the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union, the U.S has grown intoxicated on their own power, so much such that they regard no other countries as their peer competitor. But the rise of China challenges this U.S hegemonic mindset, but it's been so long that the U.S has forgotten how to interact with a peer competitor.
    16
  2076. American: "If you immigrants don't like our domestic policy, why don't you go back to where you came from?" Immigrant: "Because U.S foreign policy has destroyed my homeland and forced me to become a refugee."
    16
  2077.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "There's no question that one party government will not work in Taiwan" How can you say for sure? Previously, Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    16
  2078.  @Heythere-fz1ex  What is their motherland if not People's Republic of China? Xinjiang is part of China is it not?
    16
  2079. The soybean grower knows more about economics than the female host. The man clearly said "Brazil is China's largest soybean supplier" but the woman just insists that China's pig farm industry relies on soybeans to survive. Claiming that China is USA's biggest buyer of soybeans, does not mean USA exports more soybean to China, than say Brazil.
    16
  2080.  @Sivatra  But the words coming out of the mouths of EU diplomats like Ursula Von de Leyan, Annalena Baerbock, Josep Borell, are saying that "EU is unified."
    16
  2081.  @valenrn8657  Russia's hypersonic Kinzhal (Dagger) hit a NATO training facility in Ukraine.
    16
  2082.  @zyp85  There are multiple ways to define what democracy truly is. One common definition is a government of the people, by the people, for the people. Under this definition, the United States is not a democracy, it's a plutocracy, because the U.S government is of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%. Because the U.S government just isn't delivering what the Americans want. Whereas in China, the Chinese government is of the people, by the people, for the people, and the Chinese government is able to deliver what the people want, so in this sense, China is perhaps more democratic than the United States.
    16
  2083. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, the US is a threat to global peace and stability.
    16
  2084.  @ColoniaMurder20  Philippines was colonized by the Spanish and the Americans. Malaysia was colonized by the Portuguese, the Dutch and the British. Indonesia was colonized by the Portuguese, the Dutch, the Germans and the British. None of those countries were a part of China, nor ever colonized by China.
    16
  2085. 我们要继续努力，为中国创造更美好的未来！🇨🇳 We must continue our efforts to build a better future for China! 🇨🇳
    16
  2086.  @martinraymond2120  Russia is already the world's largest country by landmass, for what reason would they want to annex the whole of Ukraine? Russia has more land than it knows what to do with, and while some parts of Ukraine were historically part of Russia (such as Crimea, Odessa, etc) but apart from these territories, Russia has shown no interest in annexing the whole of Ukraine.
    16
  2087. Agreed. Besides drinking, in many other countries, minors under 18-21 years are also restricted from addictive activities/substances like smoking and gambling. Chinese government has added video games to that list.
    16
  2088. Here's an analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Crimea had opted to rejoin the father. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they still gave Ukraine a false sense of hope. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    16
  2089.  @YTStopCensoringFreedomOfspeech  Exactly. For all their talk about wanting to tackle climate change, the Western countries impose restrictions on Chinese EVs. It's not "overcapacity" in fact, there is a dire scarcity when it comes to affordable EVs.
    16
  2090.  @MarkYeung1  So if NATO involves itself in another war in say the Middle East, will Finland and Sweden be willing to send their troops?
    16
  2091.  @chafiqbantla1816  Russia has plenty of other buyers for its gas, namely China and India. Those sanctions that cause gas prices to rise also benefits Russia because it's a gas exporter (the world's largest in fact).
    16
  2092.  @jaimemartinez9792  I think he's/she's talking about rebuilding after nuclear war, as that seems to only way to bring the current administration to its senses.
    16
  2093.  @MarkYeung1  Ursula von der Leyen had demanded that China should stop supporting Russia, but did China demand that EU countries stop supporting Ukraine? No, instead China's foreign ministry told EU countries to talk to Putin themselves if they wanted to bring about an end to the conflict.
    16
  2094.  @bobwatchit9636  The US could have chosen peaceful cooperation with China instead of confrontation.
    16
  2095. Daniel Dumbrill posted a similar video too.
    16
  2096. In mountainous terrain combat scenario, the PLA can deploy aerial units like our very own domestically made combat UAVs like Caihong-5 for strategic surveillance and reconnaissance missions. Its also capable of equipping air to ground missiles to engage in combat with ground units from safety of the air, and has often been compared to the USA's Reaper drone. But Indian military recently crashed their Israeli-made drone in December 2017 while trespassing into Chinese airspace.
    16
  2097. Indeed. He's going down in history as the one who took down US hegemony.
    16
  2098.  @cchannel7857  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According to Gregory Clark, all available eyewitness present inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Search for an article: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies (By Gregory Clark)
    16
  2099.  @titoqsan4686  What makes you think Uighurs are locked up? In Xinjiang, you can find Uighurs celebrating festivals garbed in traditional Uighur clothing, feasting on Uighur cuisine, dancing and singing in their language, playing traditional Uighur instruments, and so on.
    16
  2100.  @ryanwalters6184  China has a 90% home ownership rate while the U.S only has a home ownership rate of only 65%. What is there to even compare when the home ownership rate is so low in the U.S?
    16
  2101. Agreed. Even Taiwanese work culture shares more similarities with mainland Chinese work culture than with American work culture.
    16
  2102.    Western countries used to send their plastic trash to China for sorting and processing, but China did something about it and banned imports of Western trash. Video: Why China Doesn't Want Your Trash Anymore youtu.be/-gNZtI7hbvI
    16
  2103.  @lorellaldos5263  China is investing in developing locally made lithography machines (i.e 28-nm lithography machine). It may be more expensive at the beginning but if mass production might eventually lower the cost of chip production.
    16
  2104.  @michaelkatz275  China and Russia are in the process of developing a gold-backed currency to reduce dependency on the USD.
    16
  2105. China's approach is to save lives at the expense of businesses. U.S's approach is to save businesses at the expense of lives.
    16
  2106.  @Chronomatrix  Where does it say that he was already living in the city? Chinese authorities quarantine the Africans that are coming into Guangzhou and also all overseas returning Chinese are subject to mandatory 14 day quarantine so how is it racism?
    16
  2107.  @bv2011  Seems like Westerners care more about the treatment of Muslims in China, not about the treatment of Chinese in Muslim majority countries.
    16
  2108.  @ngawangyoga9258  You are yoga instructor based in Paris, living comfortably at lower attitudes in developed country, yet you claim Tibetans are happy with their life on the harsh mountainous conditions on the Tibetan Plateau? The Tibet Plateau is at "The Roof of the World" with high altitudes, infertile soil, scarce rainfall, low-oxygen environments, inaccessible and isolated, so why can't Chinese built infrastructure in Tibet and modernise the region? You think every Tibetan kid wants to grow up to become dirt-poor yak herder or Buddhist monk? Tibetan kids deserve a shot at modern life and Chinese infrastructure is making life easier for Tibetans in Tibet. Just like you're living comfortable life in Paris.
    16
  2109. Sadly, anti-China sentiment is brewing in the West and this resentment might just spur Chinese scientists to consider returning to China.
    16
  2110.  @INTJ791 This is absurd. What makes you think that somehow I have the power to censor your comments? Also, you said: "神州 Shenzhou it's either you or Cyrus," but have you considered the position that it is YouTube that's behind all this?
    16
  2111.  @panyaboonc5621  Many Indians (but not all) have the colonial mentality. Colonial mentality is the internalized perception of ethnic and cultural inferiority as a result of colonization. They have an ingrained preference for Anglo Saxon culture over any "non-white" culture, including their own.
    16
  2112.  @namelesssnitchy  China lockdown Wuhan, US says: "No Human Rights!" Meanwhile, Covid-19 ravages unchecked across the USA, China says: "No Human Left…"
    16
  2113. Their voices are being silenced by those in power and/or being drowned out by the masses of not-so-clever people's voices.
    16
  2114. Agreed. The problem faced in the West is that an increase in freedom of speech, is accompanied by a decrease in taking responsibility for what's being said.
    16
  2115.  Johan Smid  Why are you repeating your comment? There are surviving records of Zheng He's voyages which also matches accounts made by the countries and lands he visited.
    16
  2116.  @AmbietsRato  Russia and China are the two countries in the world with the most number of land neighbors (14 neighbors each) and not all of our neighbors exhibit apprehension. Belarus for example is friendly towards Russia and likewise Pakistan is friendly with China. The conflicts arise from historical issues (eg WWII, Cold War, etc) and land borders and also because of the relative size of Russia and China compared to our neighbors.
    16
  2117.  @dantronics1682  I used to watch serpentza's channel, but I've noticed that his videos on China became increasingly negative over the years. Serpentza being a South African, may have been used to a sort of "apartheid" rule, and enjoyed the attention that comes with being a white foreigner in China. The glow began to fade for him as China became more developed, and it probably led to his dissatisfaction and his eventual departure.
    16
  2118. There are multiple ways to define democracy. The most common definition is that of a government of the people, by the people, for the people. Under this definition, the U.S is not a democracy, it's a plutocracy, with a government of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%. Because the U.S government is just not delivering what the people want. On the other hand, China is a democracy in the sense that the government is doing what the people want, as the Harvard University and Ash Center survey revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China.
    16
  2119. Those people from the street interviews from 30 years ago, get to experience their prediction manifest itself into reality during their lifetime.
    16
  2120.  @RockChatham  You said: "We saw what happened to Tibet" Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bones. After Tibet's return to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernizing Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water and gas pipes and electric cables as well as introducing modern conveniences like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping websites, and so on. Under the CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin languages. Chinese built hydroelectric power-stations were in Tibet to supply Tibetans with free, renewable energy to power their homes. Chinese workers also built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest railway) through dangerous mountainous terrains, freezing temperatures and low-oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    16
  2121.  @DJPOtravels  In 1958, the Vietnam PM Pham van Dong had acknowledged a Chinese declaration that the Spratly and Paracels were within Chinese territorial waters in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." ... (Source: Wikipedia:1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai)
    16
  2122. If those DPP separatists want to declare independence, then they should get off the Chinese territory of Taiwan and find some other plot of land to claim for themselves.
    16
  2123.  @fclp9713  According to a long-term survey by Harvard University and Ash Center, around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Chinese government so isn't that an illustration that the Chinese government is able to deliver? A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    16
  2124. Even Chinese Ministry Of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) spokesperson, Hua Chunying showed that "BBC isn't even trusted in the UK" (Video: MOFA: BBC is not trusted even in the UK youtu.be/L0oo8PsUKrA )
    16
  2125. Some Chinese Malaysians and Singaporeans (but not everyone) tend to have a colonial mentality of worshipping Anglo-Saxon Culture, while harboring disdain for any "non-white" culture (including their own).
    16
  2126.  @robertoosido1232  You're talking about the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea? But the United States does not ratify UNCLOS and is not a party to it, so why is the U.S carrying out Freedom of Navigation operations in UNCLOS's name?
    16
  2127.  Mike Chan  Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions?
    16
  2128. Bad news for the neocons.
    16
  2129. Trump says China took 500 billion ($500,000,000,000) of US dollars? China also help buy off 1.2 trillion dollars ($1,200,000,000,000,000) worth of US debt, in order to help USA tide through the 2008 US financial crisis.
    16
  2130. If Canada ever sends Meng to the United States, China will sever all diplomatic relations with Canada!
    16
  2131.  @yrite  Could you explain how is there wisdom in those words? It's just appears to be religious fervor to me that's all.
    16
  2132. ​ @joejunior861  India is trying to play both sides against each other, but it may end up isolating itself instead.
    16
  2133.  @eddharm7329  Japan and South Korea are ahead of China in this field
    16
  2134.  Beast Mode  Britain was a colonial superpower during 19th century, but was eventually overtaken by the United States, which became a superpower during the 20th century. Now that China is rising and expected to dominate the 21st century as a superpower, why would America not accept being 2nd place compare to China? Do Westerners know that before Britain, both China and India were superpowers from 1 - 1800 AD according to historical GDP data from Angus Maddison?
    16
  2135. Why do you think Chinese should overthrow our government? Today, China is the world's 2nd largest economy, and a collapse of CCP would send economic shockwaves throughout the global economy and result in a global recession, as Chinese investment dries up and Chinese companies close down and fire their employees. Therefore, is it actually in your own countries best interests to continue supporting the CCP to ensure that the above catastrophic scenario doesn't occur.
    16
  2136. It's the Military Industrial Complex that driving the United States to make war, to justify the insane U.S military spending (more than the next 7 countries combined). If we truly want a more peaceful world, steps need to be taken to dismantle the U.S MIC's power.
    16
  2137. Before I went to sleep, my wife was complaining to me: "This Russia is such a bad country, if Ukraine wants to join NATO, it is their business and freedom, Russia has no right to intervene. This is just an excuse for Russia to invade Ukraine." I said nothing, got out of bed and went to the kitchen, before returning to bed with knife in my hand. I told my wife: "Let's go to sleep" Upon seeing the knife, my wife sat up abruptly and looked at me with wide eyes. "What are you doing? Sleeping with a knife?!" she exclaimed. I replied: "Don’t worry about it, let’s go to sleep. Besides, me sleeping with a knife is none of your business and it is my freedom." My wife said: "You're crazy! How can I sleep when you are lying next to me with a knife? What if you accidentally cut me?" I replied: “Well, you don’t even trust your own husband, how can you expect Russia to trust Ukraine? Sleeping with a knife is like Ukraine joining the NATO." .... An anonymous analogy taken off Weibo.
    16
  2138. At the beginning you spoke of the media trying to divide Americans, yet you yourself singularly blame Trump's election as probably the "worst thing to happen to America," then perhaps aren't you yourself partaking in this attempt to divide Americans? Nearly half of American voters voted for Trump, then instead of trying to dismiss their grievances, perhaps the better idea is to try and understand where the other half is coming from? Otherwise, divisions among Americans are only going to widen.
    16
  2139. Meng Wanzhou was arrested in Canada since 2018 and its already 2020 and still her trial hasn't concluded? 2 years! What were the Canadians doing?
    16
  2140.  @buymecola1  Yeah, it's basically blackmail, if TikTok has to be forced to sell its shares. Whatever happened to the American concept of "free market?"
    16
  2141.  @MH-il1lk  According to China's Statistical Advantage by William P. Meyers Consider the standard bell curve for a population. Most people are nearly average, whether in general intelligence, a particular type of intelligence (math, memory, crossword-puzzle solving aptitude, etc.), height, or athletic ability. Now consider two bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. Let's say we are looking for the most economically effective range, the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    16
  2142.  @d9918  Are you sure they are Filipino waters? The Spratly Islands were not part of Philippine territory as per the 1898 Treaty of Paris that Spain signed with America.
    16
  2143. It's like taking a knife to a gunfight, pitting Canadian/Ukrainian infantry and snipers against Russia's mechanized army of tanks and artillery.
    16
  2144.  @MarkYeung1  One of the problems China faces is the "colonial mentality" affects overseas Chinese as well as in former colonies such as Hong Kong SAR. Such people have been subconsciously taught to see Western Anglo-Saxon culture as inherently better, and only through decolonization of the mind, can the people of Hong Kong be truly free of their colonial past.
    16
  2145. Agreed. If they don't know their own problems back home, why worry about others? Good foreign policy should first begin with good domestic policy.
    16
  2146. When Meng Wanzhou finally returns home, I don't think she'll travel to Canada ever again, for the rest of her life. The risk is just not worth it.
    16
  2147. Agreed. In many states in the U.S, it's illegal to walk around in public with a open bottle/can of alcoholic beverage in hand. But you can do that in China, no problem. Just watch Gweilo 60 do it all the time in his videos.
    16
  2148.  @usrIO30581l  Many Filipinos tend to have "colonial mentality". Not only were Philippines' lands colonized, but also the minds of its people were colonized. Even after the colonizer left, the people's minds remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. It's like Stockholm Syndrome.
    16
  2149. I miss the old weekly show where you, Daniel Dumbrill, Jayoe Nation and others would just simply talk about China. Seems like a lifetime ago.
    16
  2150. Also, if you trace the flight path of those PLA fighter planes, they actually flew closer to mainland China than to Taiwan island.
    16
  2151.  @adoreslaurel  How is China behaving badly? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    16
  2152.  @kevintewey1157  China has a bad historical run in with Opium, so its for this reason that China does not take a positive view of cannabis.
    16
  2153.  @michaelkatz275  Western journalists have long been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2022, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western journalist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for 30 years already?
    16
  2154. Every cloud has a silver lining... except the mushroom-shaped ones, which have a radioactive lining.
    16
  2155. Canada has no limit as to how long their prime minister can serve, does that mean Trudeau will be leader for the rest of his life? Same goes for the German Chancellor.
    16
  2156. China is also wooing the Pacific Island nations of Marshall Islands, Nauru, Palau, and Tuvalu in hopes of them switching their recognition of Taipei to Beijing. Much like how the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua switched their recognition to Beijing.
    16
  2157. Many in Hong Kong (but not all) are still suffering from a subservient "colonial mindset" inflicted on them as a result of being a former British colony. The British may have decolonized and physically vacated Hong Kong after 1997, but "decolonization of the mind" takes a longer time to recover from by many in Hong Kong.
    16
  2158. BRICS will soon be welcoming new members.
    16
  2159.  @calinyx  You said: "the OP's English doesn't make sense. It's like "all your bases are belong to us"." So because the OP's English proficiency is not up to your standards, you label him a Chinese bot citing the similarity of his post to an Internet meme from a poorly translated Japanese video game? Isn't that being rather racist towards Asians?
    16
  2160.  @ShuCarolina  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    16
  2161.  @hindugoat2302  Although India (world's largest democracy) doesn't have the safety or amazing infrastructure like China, but hey, at least they've got "Freedumb" same as America.
    16
  2162.  @eugenec7130  Well said. Just watching how Tik Tok's CEO (a Singaporean himself) being treated by US Congress members is itself evident of this.
    16
  2163. How is this journalism? Who was that mysterious distorted voice on board the train? They just record some unnamed voice as pass it off as an Uighur and you believe it?
    16
  2164.  @John2r1  Taiwan has been under the authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, and Chiang kai-shek was a brutal dictator who jailed or executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived), imposing martial law on Taiwan for 38 years which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Yet Taiwan's economy flourished under authoritarian single-party KMT rule , resulting in the Taiwan Miracle. Only when democracy was introduced to the island in the 1990s, that Taiwan's economic growth became more modest.
    16
  2165.  @CyrusJanssen  The Economist (and other Western journals) have been wrong about predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a compiled list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2022, and China's economy is still going strong.
    16
  2166. Indeed. The West has had centuries to develop Africa, whereas China has done much to improve African countries in just decades.
    16
  2167. 我们将继续努力～为了维护中国主权，国界和安全。🇨🇳 We will continue our efforts to safeguard China’s sovereignty, national borders, and security. 🇨🇳
    16
  2168.  @ColoniaMurder20  The Manchu conquerors of China also made Tibet part of Qing Dynasty China, (Look up Map of Qing Dynasty and Tibet is clearly part of China). Also the Qing Government abolished the notion of a "Han-only" China, and redefined China as a multi-ethnic state, not just Han only. After conquering "China proper", the Manchus identified their state as "China" (中國, Zhōngguó; "Middle Kingdom")... The emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, Tibet and other areas) as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that "China" only meant Han areas. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Qing Dynasty)
    16
  2169.  @zetristan4525  Seriously, if you're already bored of my comment, why don't you post an original comment of your own? Other people here don't seem as bored as you.
    16
  2170.  @bhrdwja  You said: "He is paid by CCP lol" Cyrus Janssen's message is that if U.S and China cooperate, then the whole world benefits. Are you implying that the CPC paid Cyrus to promote this positive message? Then isn't this a good message for the world?
    16
  2171. Agreed. NATO was formed as a response to the Soviet Union's rising military might, but the USSR has since dissolved in 1991 and NATO no longer serves any interests (except perhaps the U.S's hegemonic interests).
    16
  2172.  @MarkYeung1  China has the world's largest number of internet users.
    16
  2173.  @marysylvie2012  You said: "I am not talking about Tunisia. China helped Tunisia and many countries in Africa just to buy them." So apparently, when your country helped India during those natural disasters, it was done out of goodwill. Yet when China does the same, it's to buy them? Why the different standards when it comes to China?
    16
  2174. The people of Hawaii are at least allowed to vote, but the people of Guam and Puerto Rico have it worse since they aren't even allowed to vote in US elections at all, despite being part of US territory.
    16
  2175. During the Korean War, PLA troops had poor training, crappy weapons, overextended supply lines, lack of air and naval support, with only North Korean troops for allies. In contrast South Korea had the combined armies of USA, UK, Canada, Australia, France, Greece + 10 other countries. They had better training, superior equipment, adequate air and naval support, and Japan providing logistical support nearby. Given the odds, SK and its allies should have won the Korean War. Yet the combined might of 16 countries armies still did not win the Korean war? Against poorly trained, poorly equipped PLA soldiers without air support, naval support and with only NK troops for allies?
    16
  2176.  @currentchannel3452  David Fincher’s 1999 movie, 《Fight Club》is based on author Chuck Palahniuk's 1996 novel of the same name. China’s ending is actually closer to Palahniuk’s original vision for the ending of “Fight Club,” as written in his 1996 book. As Palahniuk told TMZ while reacting to China’s censorship, “The irony is that the way the Chinese have changed it is they’ve aligned the ending almost exactly with the ending of the book, as opposed to Fincher’s ending, which was the more spectacular visual ending. So in a way, the Chinese brought the movie back to the book a little bit.” Palahniuk also said it was interesting that suddenly everyone cared about a censored “Fight Club” ending when he’s spent nearly his entire career fighting censorship and bans when it comes to his books. “My books are heavily banned throughout the U.S.,” Palahniuk said. “The Texas prison system refuses to carry my books in their libraries. A lot of public schools and most private schools refuse to carry my books. But it’s only an issue once China changes the end of a movie? I’ve been putting up with book banning for a long time.”
    16
  2177. In 2010, Google even lost the majority market in China to their Chinese rival Baidu. While Google's market share climbed from 15% in mid-2006 to 31% in 2010, Baidu's shared increased its market share from 47% in mid-2006 to 64% in 2010, which is a significant lead. In the end, Google decided to withdraw from mainland China after losing majority market share to Baidu.
    16
  2178.  @Andy-P  Made in China 2025 is a transition from cheap low tech goods to high tech products and services. Japan, South Korea (and also Taiwan island) have recognized the opportunities created by MIC 2025, whereas the ones decoupling are EU and the US, and that will possibly put them at a disadvantage.
    16
  2179.  @Dave-bf2lc  Zelenskyy has banned all opposition media in Ukraine, and cancelled Ukraine elections, does that mean you consider him a dictator?
    16
  2180. John Milonas It's clear that no matter what Carrie Lam does, the Hong Kong protestors will not be satisfied. Lam has formally withdrawn the HK extradition bill, yet the Hong Kong protests continue. Lam has announced that she is open to dialogue but the protestors aren't, and they refuse to talk. So Hong Kong government has to resort to more authoritarian measures now that previous options have been exhausted.
    16
  2181.  @ashokjain8449  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA. PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    16
  2182.  @wesondesit9418  So because Cyrus Janssen says positive things about China, suddenly means that he's a communist party shill? Why can't he make positive remarks about China?
    16
  2183. Chinese people don't want war with India, only to solve dispute in peaceful manner. Since Indian troops have are currently in Chinese territory, the government only requests first that India withdraw its troops from the region to reduce tensions. The government even politely notified India prior to any activity in the region, to which Indian government did not respond, so why India take such aggressive stance by sending troops into our lands? Doesn't India want explore alternative peaceful solutions instead of going to war?
    16
  2184. Many Filipinos tend to have "colonial mentality". Not only were Philippines' lands colonized, but also the minds of its people were colonized. Even after the colonizer left, the people's minds remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. It's like Stockholm Syndrome.
    16
  2185.  @myresponsesarelimited7895  Most Chinese are very humble and hardly talk about China's achievements to foreign audiences. But I feel that if things are not said, then they might go unnoticed.
    16
  2186.  @cryptonite2806  You said: "神州 Shenzhou I don't see bombs falling on Russia...Every agressor ever always had some excuse." But you were talking about Russia being "historical aggressor" (yet you're talking about the present?) and your claim that Russia occupied more territory from other countries in its history than any other country has been proven false, it's actually the British Empire. And according to UN statistics, some 14,000 Ukrainians have been killed in the Donbas region over the course of 8 years by shelling by both the rebels and the Ukrainian ultra nationalist, neo nazis. Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that began since the 2014 coup d'etat of Ukrainian President Yanukovych by the USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine.
    16
  2187. When asked about WWII, most Westerners know about Hitler, the Nazis and the suffering of Jews during the Holocaust. But when asked about Imperial Japan during WWII, they'll often scratch their heads asking "What's the name of the Japanese Emperor? What happened in Nanjing? What's Unit 731 supposed to be?"
    16
  2188.  @bigchef3394  Economic puppet? China literally bought an estimated 1.1 trillion dollars ($1,100,000,000,000) worth of U.S debt to help America tide itself over the 2008 financial crisis, does that make U.S.A an economic puppet of China?
    16
  2189.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Again, since you know so much about @mansana, why don't you go bother him instead of telling me all this? And regarding Fort Detrick, didn't Victoria Nuland just admitted in court that Ukraine has "bio research facilities"? If those bio labs in Ukraine were supposedly for peaceful purposes, why would Nuland be concerned about the "data falling into Russian hands"? Yet when Russia and China ask to investigate U.S biolabs like Fort Detrick, we get laughed at by Western MSM? You said: "I caught a senior University lecturer in my country (from China) making remarks about the justification of Russia's attacks on the Ukraine. When I asked him whether he was comfortable if the University knew about his activities, he pretended he wasn't the Professor, but oddly, the Professor quickly changed his YouTube name, threatened me with lawsuits, but deleted his LinkedIn page. His behaviour tells me he agrees that the University would view it as a breach of their ethics for making such posts." So this professor from China is lecturing in a University in your country? If there was truly "freedom of speech" in the West, then he should be able to make remarks justifying Russia's stance in your country. But it's apparent that Western countries are forcing people who voice a view different from the mainstream view is going to suffer consequences. Just look at the crackdown against Russians, Russian athletes and sportsmen, even Russian artists, musicians and composers are being pressured to condemn Putin or else. The fact that he fears your country's university singling him out as a breach of ethics just for voicing a different view is proof that there's no real freedom of speech in the West. You said: "Funny though, he acts like the West is crap but when threatened with losing his lifestyle, he becomes quiet about it." Of course, he should be able to make remarks justifying Russia's stance without facing backlash in the West, yet it's apparent that he fears for his job in your country's university only further shows that there's no real freedom of speech in the West.
    16
  2190.  @lancemollenhauer9740  You said: "Got to give to the people (Allies) who worked hard for China's freedom in 1940 to 1945." That's because Pearl Harbor was bombed, that the US joined China and entered WWII. Imperial Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931 and the West were content to let the Japanese conquer more and more Chinese territory.
    16
  2191.  @sammexp  Hong Kong was previously under British colonial rule from 1841-1997, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before?
    16
  2192.  @taiwan6691    If the Communist Party of China supposedly paid Cyrus to promote the positive message of "Building Bridges, not Walls", then frankly speaking, isn't that a good thing that CPC is promoting cooperation not confrontation?
    15
  2193. +Robert Hardy Also, the new Taiwan government DPP is still rather green, yet the people of Taiwan are entrusting them to lead Taiwan to declare independence, and possibly triggering a war with People's Republic of China? The DPP is NOT the battle-hardened and politically-experienced KMT of the past, and even the KMT lost the mainland to the Communists, so how do you expect them to win, with such an inexperienced leader at Taiwan's helm?
    15
  2194.  MrMarcosema  What makes you think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Everyone in the world has heard of Chinese tourists spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese students, studying the same topics as their peers. Where ever you live, haven't you seen the Chinese nationals in your area?
    15
  2195.  @GMK189-f2k  You said: "they are worried about safety of athletes. They are going to protect are people from CCP." Well, why athletes then if you're worried about their safety? I mean, the U.S claims that there are so-called "human rights violations" in Xinjiang, then why bother to send athletes to participate in the games at all? Why not USA do a full boycott if they truly believe in their claims, rather than a half-assed boycott? It just goes to show that USA doesn't really believe in its own claims then, yet the other 5 Eyes nations are just hopping on the boycott bandwagon.
    15
  2196. It's a good thing you didn't follow it with "One Malaysia." Dodged a bullet there.
    15
  2197. Some of the military equipment have been recycled into museum pieces on display in Moscow.
    15
  2198.  @MarkYeung1  China already has the world's largest population at 1.4 billion people, so China does not really have a need for immigrants unlike the U.S. That's why China make stricter immigration policies, while the U.S make looser immigration policies. If a foreigner in U.S has family member or relative who has American citizenship, then they are themselves eligible to apply for U.S citizenship. So it's not a matter of citizens moving where, it's a matter of a country's immigration policies.
    15
  2199. Meng Wanzhou was kidnapped since 2018 and its already 2020 and her trial still hasn't concluded? 2 years! What were the Canadians doing?
    15
  2200. Victor Gao is fantastic, and China needs more of such speakers like him to represent the Chinese point of view towards events. Apart from Mr Gao, you can also look up videos of Prof Zhang Weiwei and Eric Li debating on The Nexus Institute here on YouTube.
    15
  2201. ​ @Andy-P  The mighty U.S army lost the Vietnam War to a bunch of starving Vietnamese peasants. Even recently, the U.S army lost the nearly 20-year war in Afghanistan against a bunch of insurgents, yet you still think the U.S will win?
    15
  2202.  @TalesOfGod  You were talking about Singapore leading in several types of infrastructure, when China is world's leader in infrastructure. Even in bridges, many of world's longest bridges found in China, not Singapore. Source: List of longest bridges wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest_bridges Why are you accusing me of being a 50 cent army? When did I ever mention anything about the Communist Party of China here in this thread?
    15
  2203.  @TalesOfGod  said "Netherlands is the world leader in agriculture" China can support 20 % of the world's population with only 7 % arable land. We are home to the world's largest pig farms and sheep farms. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of world's reported fish production and our fish farms make up two-thirds of world's reported aquaculture production. China also ranks 1st among agricultural output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplants, potatoes, sweet potatoes, spinach, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, and many more than any other country in the world. Source: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_producing_countries_of_agricultural_commodities
    15
  2204. The American youth generation will face nearly insurmountable obstacles, like the Western MSM near-constant demonization of China, as well as the Red Scare (fear of communism) and Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West.
    15
  2205.  @Raumance  Had the Russian forces truly met actual resistance, then they wouldn't have captured Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhia and Kherson, won't they?
    15
  2206. ​ @Raumance  That's the 3rd time you've been calling me naive. I've been citing evidence to support my point. But all you seem to do is dismiss my points and call me naive, naive, naive. Even though I've cited evidence to support my argument, and you've provided nothing to support yours.
    15
  2207. It's because Saudi Arabia agreed to price their oil in U.S Dollars, that led to the birth of the Petrol Dollar. But recently, Saudi Arabia is selling their oil in other currencies like India Rupee, Russian Ruble and Chinese Renminbi, so this might potentially spell the end of the Petrol Dollar.
    15
  2208. China only has one overseas base in Djibouti, whereas India also has overseas bases like Surkhet Air base in Nepal and Farkhor Air Base in Tajikistan. What about in western Bhutan, where India has Indian Military Training Team permanently there?
    15
  2209.  @everythingandmore5537  Since China's political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    15
  2210. In China, the single party has to represent all 100% of Chinese people's interests (or at least 80-90%) as there is no other party to blame. In America's two-party system, if either the Republicans or Democrats get into power, there is only partial representation say about 51% of American's interests and not the remaining 49% who voted for the other party. (In reality, it may even be less than that, and it represents only 1% of American's interests, if you know what I mean)
    15
  2211.  @thelonegerman2314  It's a combination of the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (phobia of the West being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, such that the thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China surpassing the U.S someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    15
  2212.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "In fact, the war has the opposite effect of strengthening NATO." NATO is running out of military aid to send to Ukraine, so how is this strengthening NATO? Even Poland, one of Ukraine's staunchest allies and a member of NATO, is no longer supplying weapons to Ukraine.
    15
  2213.  @rodneyagesa1851  Indeed. The Azov's devotion to their Nazi ideology is kinda like the Japanese Yakuza or the Chinese Triad gangsters, tattooing their bodies to show their loyalty.
    15
  2214.  @avalagum7957  "The same thing would happen with Vietnam, Philippines..." Vietnam was invaded by the United States during Vietnam War. And who could forget the American-Philippine war in which Philippines lost and became a US colony.
    15
  2215. China was "democratic" under Kuomintang during Republic of China (1911-1949), but during that period, China was fragmented into different provinces and ruled by individual warlords and even Tibet broke free of Qing rule during 1911. KMT governed China for almost 40 years, but failed to unify China. But after Japanese surrender, China was finally unified under communism in 1949 by Mao Zedong and regained control of Tibet in 1951. I know Western anti-communist media always paint Mao and communism as "evil" as but if not for Mao, China would have remained divided and possibly fragmented into different states like Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, etc, just like when the USSR collapse and the satellite states broke free of the Soviet Union.
    15
  2216. It's up to the people of Taiwan to decide at the polls and vote for a leader that desires peace not war.
    15
  2217.  @blitz12399  "that’s a lie. Ukraine was depending on Soviet era weapons. " Doesn't prove that it's a lie. Some countries in Nato have Soviet era weapons that they could send to Ukraine. Also, Ukrainian airforce has been active since 1992
    15
  2218. Excellent post. I would also like to add that complete dedollarization can only occur if there is a suitable replacement for it, be it a basket of BRICS currencies, or countries simply using their own currency for business transactions.
    15
  2219.  @scroopynooperz9051  China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today. Other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia have since succumbed to history. China has always been governed by a strong centralized government in the form of the Emperor of China, surrounded by ministers in the Imperial Court. No doubt, China has seen its fair share of tyrannical emperors who care nothing for the people. But such behavior often spells the end of the dynasty as the people rose to overthrow the emperor in rebellion. Yet in the end, a new emperor rises to take control of China and the system of governance continues as it has for thousands of years. Despite the flaws of such a system, history has shown that a strong centralized government works for China.
    15
  2220.  LOSER Trump  China is observing a zero-Covid-19 policy and curbing the spread of Covid-19 as much as possible, which reduces the likelihood of new Covid strains emerging. Whereas USA is letting Covid-19 run rampant and infecting more peoples, and each transmission increases the possibility of new strains emerging, so in this case, isn't US the real virus factory?
    15
  2221.  @claudiusgothicus1568  The dream's becoming reality even as we speak. BRICS is getting ready to welcome new members next year.
    15
  2222.  @MarkYeung1  Previously, under Ma Ying-jeou, Taiwan and the mainland enjoyed warm relations, until Tsai Yingwen came to power and Taiwan's relations with the mainland have started deteriorating since the DPP've been in power.
    15
  2223.  @pingpong7810  Cyrus Janssen is concerned about the deteriorating US-China relations between our countries that could possibly lead to outright war (which would be a disaster for the world). The Western MSM is spreading fear and paranoia over China to their audiences, whereas Cyrus is fighting for peace and promoting his positive message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" through helping other countries under China. If peave prevails, it means Cyrus message has gotten through. If war breaks out between USA and China, it means that Western anti-China propaganda has won.
    15
  2224. What better way to finance wars with a money-printing machine.
    15
  2225.  @IbrahimNgeno  Still, photovoltaics are inefficient, they only convert 15% of the Sun's energy into electricity. Molten salt is more efficient, and able to convert 70% of the Sun's energy into electricity. Molten salt is also capable of generating power at night as demonstrated.
    15
  2226. Same trajectory as the US's recent withdrawal from Afghanistan. Which is also the same trajectory as the end of the Vietnam War, with the Fall of Saigon.
    15
  2227.  @rickbold9337  You said: "Ya, love those fair and free Russian elections! 😂 " I'm glad you've acknowledged that Russia's election are fair and free. Russia had invited foreign observers from 36 countries (including 30 national parliaments) as well as 5 international organizations to visit Russia and monitor the election to ensure that it's as fair and free as possible.
    15
  2228.  @stayprepared2388  Covid-19 is like a global test that everyone has to take. China studied extremely hard for the exam and passed with flying colours and we are now celebrating our well-deserved graduation ceremony. Whereas Western countries had extra time to prepare for the test, yet many Westerners laughed at China's misfortune and mocked China's answers as too "draconian." Yet now they are accusing China of cheating, yet they are now blatantly copying China's homework after ridiculing them earlier.
    15
  2229.  @daxtynminn3415  You said: "Another big thing is China is constantly manipulating the value of it's currency up and down to maximize economic growth." USA did not designate China as a currency manipulator, where are you getting this information that China constantly manipulate the value of our currency?
    15
  2230.  @martinjerald6000  Since you're so devoted to the Bible, did you know that the oldest church in Gaza, the Orthodox Church of Saint Porphyrius (widely believed to be the 3rd oldest church in the world) has been hit by the IDF, and at least 18 Christian Palestinians seeking shelter in the church have been killed?
    15
  2231. USA is invading countries in Middle East and cutting off the heads (Muammar Gaddafi, Saddam Husein, etc) and then installing their own US puppet in those countries.
    15
  2232. Greater China is already the world's largest exporters of integrated circuits. Here's a list of countries/states by integrated circuit exports in 2019: 1. Hong Kong, China ($134,483 million) 2. Mainland China ($102,187 million) 3. Taiwan, China ($100,408 million) 4. South Korea ($79,082 million) 5. Singapore ($76,868 million) 6. Malaysia ($44,794 million) 7. United States ($40,099 million) 8. Japan ($27,791 million) 9. Vietnam ($26,084 million) 10. Philippines ($18,991 million) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by integrated circuit exports
    15
  2233.  @vueport99  Moving the goalpost? China's definition of extreme poverty is more stringent than that of the World Bank. In China, earning less than $2.30 a day at purchasing power parity (PPP) is considered being in extreme poverty, compared to the World Bank's definition of $1.90 or less per day. ... Source: Wikipedia: Poverty in China So China actually holds to a higher extreme poverty standard compared to the World Bank.
    15
  2234.  @stunningandbrave2520  Which successful company has been taken over by the state and then become unsuccessful?
    15
  2235.  @Mohit-uk6pm  You Indians love Chinese smartphones! Besides Huawei, Xiaomi was started in 2010. Today it's one of the world's most popular smartphones. In India, it's number one. Video: How Xiaomi broke out of China to go global youtu.be/291DlKa7iIU
    15
  2236.  @billyehh  It's the property speculation that's causing problems. President Xi Jinping is putting an end to it, stating that "Houses are for living in, not for speculation." (房子是用來住的，不是用來炒的。)
    15
  2237.  @csking6377  The problem is that people tend to distrust the people they have wronged in the past. If say, after you've done somebody wrong (in this case, the West has done China wrong in the past) then it's human nature that you would fear revenge from the people you've wronged. Not just China, but the West has also done much wrong to many other countries and cultures, that they now fear retribution for their actions. That's why they are asking such a question as "Can China be trusted?" It's a very cynical way of looking at the situation.
    15
  2238. I've heard that the reason why Indonesia is relocating it's capital is because the city of Jakarta is overpopulated and appears to be slowly "sinking" (at the rate of 20cm a year) due to massive underground works and overuse of groundwater.
    15
  2239. Back then, the USA accuse mainland China of potentially abusing the Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now scrapped). Now the USA turn around and abuse their own extradition bill with Canada with Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou. The USA accuse others of doing things that they themselves are done. The sheer irony!
    15
  2240. @BrainYtreeX Why don't you provide a deeper one of your own?
    15
  2241.  @calinyx  Those Chinese swimmers have been tested 200 times by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Why is there a need for a 3rd party agency of which may be of a questionable reputation?
    15
  2242. Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) that have had an impact in their respective fields. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge much easier. The Compass made navigation in bad weather without Sun/stars much easier. And Gunpowder has revolutionized warfare.
    15
  2243.  @andrenogueira5058  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a myth propagated by the British. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    15
  2244. The U.S literally dropped 200+ tonnes of bombs over Cambodia through 2,565 sorties from 1965 to 1968, despite not knowing where Cambodia is.
    15
  2245.  @jamesmorrow1646  To have a better understanding of the conflict, we need to turn to the history. Historically, Ukraine was ruled by a variety of external powers including Austria, Ottoman Empire, Tsardom of Russia and of course the Soviet Union. Ukraine's modern territory was actually historically Russian territory but was given to them by the Bolsheviks during the Soviet Union. During the USSR period, many Russians travelled all over the Soviet States (especially Ukraine) to work on Soviet projects. But in 1990, the USSR collapse and many Russians suddenly found themselves trapped outside of Russia.
    15
  2246. "Politics is war without bloodshed, and war is politics with bloodshed." (政治是不流血的战争，战争是流血的政治) - Chairman Mao Zedong
    15
  2247. Many Chinese are optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    15
  2248. It's all about the colonial mentality. Even Canada and Australia are having a difficult time escaping those US claws.
    15
  2249. China has big plans to be world space leader by 2045, and to build space elevator by then, that would greatly lower the costs to send cargo into orbit around the Earth, and possibly to the Moon.
    15
  2250. Best for organizing Chinese society at the least. China is not expecting other countries to copy China's form of government (unlike the USA with democracy) and it's probably best if other countries learn from China and come up with a governing system that best suits their country.
    15
  2251.  @CyrusJanssen  We appreciate all that you do, but please do take care of your health. Wishing you a speedy recovery.
    15
  2252. More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy taken off Weibo helps puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    15
  2253.  @andrecampbell9651  Russia is experiencing economic growth, while many of the Western democracies are expected to enter into recession.
    15
  2254. As long as peace prevails in the next few years, China will eventually cross this dangerous threshold, until US declines to the point where they can't afford to challenge China anymore. Time and patience is on China's side.
    15
  2255.  @suppeeps5393  "神州 Shenzhou Hey West is still winning" In what exactly? Countries like China and India are buying Russian gas at a discount, while European countries are resorting to energy rationing in order to survive the upcoming winter.
    15
  2256. So do the people of the Middle East deserve peace as well.
    15
  2257. @ALex T You still think China will fall? Over 50 years ago, nobody ever thought "communist" China would ever succeed or play an important role in world politics back then. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1990s, everyone fully expected China to collapse soon as well. But China defied all expectations of failure, and have survived long after the USSR dissolution, China has transforming from dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, into world's 2nd largest economy, the manufacturing hub of the world, having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, and China today has strong global presence as well as being influential player of politics Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 19th in the world, its manufacturing jobs have all but been outsourced to the mainland ("Made in Taiwan" used to be commonplace, now its replaced by "Made in China") its military has failed to retake the mainland like it promised, and it relies on importing U.S weapons for its defense. Worst of all, Taiwan today has hardly any global presence nor is it influential in politics, and it is merely a pawn in the chessboard between world powers.
    15
  2258. Although Zheng He was born to Muslim parents, the dominant religion in Ming dynasty China, was Confucianism (not really a religion, but more a set of principles), Taoism, and Buddhism.
    15
  2259.  @koblongata  Many in the West believe the conflict just started a few weeks ago. But the truth is that this conflict have been ongoing for 8 years, by Ukrainian ultra-nationalist neo-Nazis groups like the Azov Battalion carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Lugansk. Since 2014, over 13,000 people have been killed in those two regions, and the Minsk Agreements were supposed to put an end to the fighting, include a ceasefire, facilitate withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, and implement constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas. But the Minsk Agreements were not honored. Russia is not starting a war, they are putting an end to one that began since the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukoyvch by the USA and installing U.S puppet governments in Kiev. Even leaked audio recordings by U.S ambassadors confirm this plot by the US.
    15
  2260.  @koblongata  What makes you claim China has no real Internet? China literally has the world's largest Internet population more than any other in the world. Here's a List of countries by number of Internet users: List of countries by number of Internet users 1. China (1,010,740,000) 2. India (833,710,000) 3. United States (312,320,000) 4. Indonesia (212,354,070) 5. Brazil (160,010,801) 6. Nigeria (136,203,231) 7. Bangladesh (129,180,000) 8. Russia (118,800,000) 9. Pakistan (117,400,000) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by number of Internet users So there are virtually more Chinese Internet users than any other in the world. How is China a threat to the free world? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    15
  2261. Brian, you're doing us all a great service providing updates on Ukraine. I'm sure I speak for many, when I say we are all starved for alternative political takes of the Russo-Ukraine crisis apart from the Western mainstream media, since Russia's point of view is absent after the banning of RT and Sputnik News. Keep up the good work!
    15
  2262.  @drmodestoesq  China's political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western liberal democracy then? Because Westerners say so?
    15
  2263.  @OneDrumOfficial1  China has made 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans to chart the course of China's future. Abolishing the term limits means that our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. Whereas U.S presidents have to step down after 4-8 years so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more.
    15
  2264.  @PrimeV88  You said: "The world needed a factory to produce goods and China positioned itself very well." So according to your words, China was fulfilling a need, then how's that at the expense of the West? You said: "namely India which has the potential to become the world’s next electronics and tech manufacturing factory." Unlikely though. China is already the world's electronics and tech maufacturing hub, what advantage does India enjoy that China doesn't? Are Indian workers willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers?
    15
  2265. Craine Big Brother During Rape of Nanjing, Japanese soldiers butchered unarmed Chinese men for sport, making it a competition to see who can rack up the most kills, and Chinese women were gang raped. Their bodies were left naked and mutilated, with their genitals bayoneted or having sharp bamboo sticks shoved in. Young children and the elderly weren't spared and the Japanese soldiers actually cut open young children's bodies to rape them. Pregnant women had their swollen bellies bayoneted after being raped and their unborn fetus ripped out of their wombs. Sons were forced to rape mothers and fathers were forced to rape daughters.
    15
  2266.  @qingdaocitizen7957  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    15
  2267.  @pbworld7858  Probably because the USSR's collapse in 1990s was just so sudden and unexpected, that there wasn't enough time to proper demarcate the individual countries borders before the satellite states claimed independence.
    15
  2268.  @anesthesiabeyond8519  The best course of action is for the Ukrainian President Zelenskiy to surrender Ukraine instead of insisting that his people sacrifice their lives. It's apparent that NATO and USA aren't going to send troops to defend Ukraine. Ukraine joining NATO is unlikely to happen, because it would mean that NATO is obliged to defend Ukraine, so I can't see that happening. By refusing to surrender, Zelenskiy is only prolonging the inevitable. By arming civilians, Zelenskiy is trying to maximise the civilian casualties. By removing the age restrictions for conscription, Zelenskiy is effectively enlisting child soldiers to fight and die for his refusal to surrender. By refusing to surrender, Zelenskiy is only prolonging the inevitable.
    15
  2269. @Ben Benito China has conducted the world’s first 5G remote surgery, where a doctor located in the southeastern province of Fujian removed the liver of a laboratory test animal 50km (30 miles) away from the operating theater, by controlling robotic surgical arms over a 5G connection.
    15
  2270. Its bigger than electric scooter, suitable for mothers with multiple kids.
    15
  2271.  @newfaith912  No opportunity to meet any Chinese? Located in virtually every major city in the world, is an area where people can sample Chinese cuisine as well as enjoy Chinese culture. These areas are known as "Chinatowns" and they are everywhere in the world, yet you're saying you don't know of any Chinese? Even though I'm sure everyone has heard of Chinese tourists and international students? Then I think the problem doesn't lie with Chinese, it's most likely you that avoid talking to Chinese.
    15
  2272. India is at a crossroad in this upheaval of global politics. Pakistan PM Imran Khan's ousting was a U.S-backed coup in Pakistan, because he choose to buy wheat and gas from Russia, and made decisions benefiting Pakistan. Hopefully India takes notice of what happened in Pakistan and takes steps to prevent U.S from doing the same to India.
    15
  2273. It's the combination of the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (phobia of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th Century, many have grown so thoroughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western country like China eventually surpassing the USA someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    15
  2274. One only need to watch your previous video, where you appeared on Piers Morgan Uncensored to be aware of the Sino-phobic sentiment in the West.
    15
  2275.  @petersinclair3997  Mainland China is clearly being benign, it's the US House of Representative speaker's visit to the island that's increasing cross-strait tensions. If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it states that the island is part of China.
    15
  2276.  LOU ALEX  China can support 20% of the world's populations with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food to export to other countries. China is home to the world's largest pig, sheep, goat and duck farms. China accounts for one-third of the world's reported fish production as well as two-thirds of the world's reported aquaculture production. China ranks top in agricultural produce, producing more rice, lettuce, onions, cabbage, green beans, green peas, cauliflowers, broccoli, eggplant, potato, spinach, carrots, turnips, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pear, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, chestnuts, walnuts, than any other country in the world.
    15
  2277. China ranks 2nd in the world in total number of UNESCO World Heritage sites at 56 sites, just behind Italy in 1st place with 58 sites.
    15
  2278. Hopefully the people of Taiwan are smart enough to learn lessons from Ukraine on what happens when you become an ally of the United States. As Henry Kissinger said: "To be an enemy of the US is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal."
    15
  2279.  @MansMan42069  Agreed. Both Malaysia and Singapore are former British colonies, but Malaysia is more resistant to colonial mentality than its neighbor Singapore, despite Singapore having a higher percentage of ethnic Chinese.
    15
  2280. I recommend you show her this short 3-min clip of Ürümqi, Xinjiang's capital in China (Video:youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA ) and encourage her to visit Xinjiang and see what life is like there for herself.
    15
  2281. India and China have 2,500 miles of border regions to fight if war does break out between our countries. Furthermore, China's greatest military asset our land army PLA, which is world's largest land army. But our government tries to settle it peacefully, giving Indian government plenty of time to withdraw its troops. War in Asia will not benefit our countries and will only destroy the growing economies both our countries enjoyed past decades. We should instead be cooperating in BRICS summit to plan Asia's growth and resist advance of Western influence in BRICS countries.
    15
  2282. Colonial mentality is still present among many Indians where they continue worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture long after decolonization. After the British left India, the Indian mindsets also need to change and undergo decolonization as well.
    15
  2283.  @Nethan2000  Chicken? Why is the US withdrawing support from Ukraine then?
    15
  2284.  @cantripleplays  Right now, China's and Russia's interests align. But the US and EU's interests do not.
    15
  2285.  Charles Schmid  China's political is not a Western brand of democracy, yet our political system has shown to be extremely successful for China, then why can't Westerners accept a political system different from theirs? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    15
  2286.  @Alpha1598753  The world came closest to a nuclear war during the Cold War, which was at that time, a bipolar world divided between USA and the former Soviet Union. The world became unipolar after USSR dissolved in 1990s. The rise of China, Russia and BRICS is giving birth to the multipolar world to bring balance to the world.
    15
  2287.  @emichaelny336  Previously under the Dalai Lama, Tibet's population consisted of 95% slaves and the remaining 5% their owners. Today, Tibet has been liberated and reunified with the rest of the mainland. Previously, Hong Kong had been under authoritarian rule of colonial Britain, and the people there did not enjoy democracy. Only under the One Country, Two Systems policy did the people of Hong Kong finally get to vote in elections, when they haven't been doing so for 150 years as a British Colony. And both Mainland China and Taiwan agreed to the One China principle that the island is a part of China, and this is the basis for establishing trade relations between the island and the mainland.
    15
  2288. According Scientific American, no coronavirus has ever been found in aquatic animals, so why can't Wuhan seafood market continue to sell live seafood? Japan and South Korea also have seafood market.
    15
  2289. The world hegemon is like a sinking ship, and many U.S "allies" are sticking to this sinking vessel.
    15
  2290. Indeed, the irony between mainland China tolerating U.S troops stationed in Taiwan, while USA decrying a security pact between China and Solomon Islands.
    15
  2291.  @adhanetkidane  Have you checked if your phone/device is made in China?
    15
  2292. In the U.S, the President have to step down after 4-8 years so they can only make short-term plans, instead of long-term plans spanning, say 10 years for America's future. Whereas China has many 5-year, 10-year, 20-year, 30-year plans, to map out China's direction and future in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future.
    15
  2293.  @MarkYeung1  Putin had declared Donetsk and Luhansk as independent republics. But the ultra-nationalist neo-nazis (Azov Battalion) in Ukrainian Army continued to shell those two republics, so Moscow interpreted it as an attack by Kiev on two sovereign republics, and retaliated against Ukraine.
    15
  2294.  @MarkYeung1  Being Jewish doesn't necessarily mean that he's immune from supporting neo-nazis. During Nazi Germany there were Jews that collaborated with the Nazis. George Soros is Jewish, yet he gladly admitted to being a Nazi collaborator and he doesn't regret it till this day.
    15
  2295. Daniel Vedberg Sekulic You claimed that I am definitely wrong to assume Tibetans are better off today then under the Dalai Lama? Then can you prove how I am definitely wrong then? Did the Tibetans have Internet at all, under the Dalai Lama rule? Today, China has the world's largest Internet population and thanks to that, Tibetans can enjoy Internet access and WiFi, allow the normally isolated place in the Himalayas, to enjoy better connectivity with rest of the world today. You claim Tibet prosperity is "outrightly wrong" then can you prove how it is outrightly wrong? Did Tibetans have any universities or schools, or hospitals, etc, prior to coming under Chinese control in 1951? I think you are confusing Xinjiang with Tibet, as they are both different provinces of China and have different demographic presence and religions. Tibetans are not Muslims, they are Buddhists and the Muslims in Xinjiang (the Uighurs) aren't Tibetans or Buddhists. And I believe both of those people enjoy better education, better healthcare, better housing, better amenities like running water, gas and electricity, under Chinese rule, than they did on their own. Countries all over the world recognize Tibet as an autonomous region of China. Which country today recognize Tibetan independence? Look at part 1:35 of the video, and Tibet was part of Qing dynasty China. Look at part 1:48 of the video and Tibet was part of Republic of China. Look at a Map of PRC today, and Tibet is part of China. You think that Buddhist philosophy alone can keep the people in Tibet fed? That by rejecting material wealth, desires and so on, it becomes an excuse to keep Tibet constantly poor and cut off from modernization? Do you know what Tibet was like under the Dalai Lama rule? It was brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves, and the 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainuous soil was infertile, and slaves had to work all day to produce enough food to feed the population, but thanks to modernization, Tibet can now import food from the mainland (through the Qinghai railway) to feed its population. More universities are built in Tibet, so Tibetans can go to school, graduate and venture into cities to find jobs. I mean, you think every Tibetan wants to be a yak farmer, or a monk? Because those two are virtually the ONLY options available to Tibetans under the Dalai Lama rule.
    15
  2296. It seems that many people would rather believe someone who has demonstrated little knowledge of Xinjiang and has never been, rather than accounts from people who actually been to Xinjiang and seen what life is like there for themselves.
    15
  2297.  Salvador Vizcarra  Well said. NATO was formed in response to Soviet Union's rising military might, but after the USSR dissolution, NATO no longer serves any interests (except perhaps the U.S interests in maintaining hegemonic rule).
    15
  2298.  @nmew6926  China only makes up 10% of Sri Lanka's foreign debt, the remaining 90% of Sri Lanka's debt are owned by Japan, India and the West. How is China to blame for Sri Lanka's debt crisis then?
    15
  2299.  @KGF007  "Chinese virtues? What a comedy" Chinese traditional virtues are about loyalty, filial piety, peace, harmony, but also includes virtues like justice and righteousness. While kindness and respect is encouraged, but it doesn't mean one should ignore injustices and wrongdoing being done. "Repay virtue with virtue, and evil with justice." (以直报怨，以德报德) by Confucius.
    15
  2300.  @ericcartmann  said "Chinese people can starve" China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_producing_countries_of_agricultural_commodities
    15
  2301.  @Esquera123  China has SMIC (中芯国际) , HiSilicon (海思), UNISOC (紫光展锐), and so on. China's first fully domestically fabricated chip, the Kirin 9000S, was made by Huawei subsidiary HiSilicon and used in its products.
    15
  2302. Did George Bush Jr live up to George Bush Sr's legacy?
    15
  2303.  @billyehh  It's named after one of the top grossing films in China. While the term itself isn't used by Chinese people, it's being used by the West to label Chinese diplomats who speak in a tone similar to how most Western diplomats speak about China.
    15
  2304.  @peanut0brain  American "diplomats" (if they can be called that) exhibit Wolf Warrior diplomacy, such as Jake Sullivan, Anthony Blinken and John Kirby. But still they use that term against Chinese diplomats.
    15
  2305.  @patrikpass2962  Hong Kong actually held more elections AFTER the 1997 handover, than they ever did for 150 years as a British colony. Hong Kong recently held an election resulting in landslide victory, so how exactly is the Communist Party of China taking over Hong Kong?
    15
  2306. @: iLive : Agreed. Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why Apple, Google, Facebook, and Amazon dominate their respective industries and eliminated competition from smaller American firms. China's anti-monopoly law is clamping down on anti-competitive practices by Jack Ma of Alibaba.
    15
  2307.  @MH-il1lk  "American home ownership has nothing to do with your argument." Yes it does, it's another example of home ownership rate to compare Russia's with. Are you American perhaps?
    15
  2308.  @marysylvie2012  You said: "But China, which does not care of its own citizens cannot possibly have true compassion for the world ." What makes you think China does not care of its own citizens? According to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty; China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to 0.7% in 2015. China's literacy rates doubled, our life spans doubled and so did average life expectancy. In fact, as of 2021, China has a higher life expectancy than that of the US. (US life expectancy at birth is now at 76.1 years, versus 77.1 for China)
    15
  2309.  @mohibquadri4053  India's biggest obstacle is its mindset. Many Indians (but not all) still retain the colonial mentality of worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture.
    15
  2310.  @dinesh50448  China's Covid-19 response is to sacrifice businesses to save lives. India's Covid-19 response is to sacrifice lives to save businesses.
    15
  2311.  @jacwi8719  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w Which country is the real threat to global peace and stability?
    15
  2312.  @currentchannel3452  If you claim Cyrus is somehow being paid by China to promote his peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" then isn't that a positive message for the world? U.S-China relations have deteriorated to their lowest point in decades, and a potential hot war would not only be disastrous for both our countries, but for the rest of the world as well. So isn't Cyrus message of "don't fear China" a good message to help diffuse the fear and paranoia towards China?
    15
  2313. Many Filipinos (but not all of them) tend to have the colonial mentality. Colonial mentality is the internalized perception of ethnic and cultural inferiority as a result of colonization. They have an ingrained preference for Anglo Saxon culture over any "non-white" culture, including their own.
    15
  2314.  @educateyourself3872  China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today. China has always been governed by a strong central government, whether under the Emperor and the Imperial Court, or under the Communist Party of China today, and such a political system has shown be effective for governing China. Not all countries have to adopt "Western style" democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    15
  2315. Agreed. Many Westerners readily display the Ukrainian Flag in solidarity, but how many of them are willing to show the Iraq Flag, Syrian Flag, Libya Flag, Afghanistan Flag, etc?
    15
  2316. It's a kind of mental colonization. The colonizer not only colonize territory, but in the process they also colonize the minds of local people. Even after the colonizer left, the local people's minds may remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. Examples include Philippines and even Hong Kong.
    15
  2317. More Singaporeans need to wear masks while going out. There is possibility of asymptomatic infection (meaning you don't display any obvious symptoms, despite contracting Covid-19) and you could infect others without knowing you have the virus yourself.
    15
  2318.  @kingsly3690  You asked: "Where did you get that statistic from?" Countries by Rare Earth Reserves (2024) 1. China: 44 million tonnes 2. Vietnam: 22 million tonnes 3. Brazil: 21 million tonnes 4. Russia: 10 million tonnes 5. India: 6.9 million tonnes ... Source: World Population Review: Rare-Earth Reserves by Country
    15
  2319. China has not been involved in any major war since 1979 and has been peaceful for 30 years, whereas USA is still involved in Afghan War, Iraq War and other wars in Middle East, even in 21st century.
    15
  2320. China actually provide humanitarian aid to Ukraine as well as offer to act as peace mediator (12-point peace process) between Ukraine and Russia.
    15
  2321. In the past, China suffered from brain drain. Today however, it's the U.S that suffers from this, while China is reversing its brain drain through offering economic opportunities to overseas Chinese.
    15
  2322.  @elsagelympne7943  Mainland China has 56 ethnic groups including Han, Uighurs, Tibetans, Mongolians, etc. Taiwan island also has people of aboriginal descendent other than Han.
    15
  2323. Why are you Indians so confident that other countries like India and hate China? Even if Japan and China relations aren't good, China is still one of Japan's biggest trading partners. According to Tourism in China statistics, over 2 million Japanese tourists visit China in 2015 (2nd largest tourist population, after South Korea) so why would Japan risk its economy and tourists, just to join India in war against China? You Indians say China thinks too highly of itself, but likewise I think you Indians regard India too highly, thinking that India's allies will be willing to destroy their economies for India's sake.
    15
  2324. ​ @im_a_surfingdoggo  Hong Kong today has their own government separate from the mainland government, their own HK passport, their own HK currency, even their own HK flag 🇭🇰. Same goes for Macau 🇲🇴 as well, under the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy.
    15
  2325.  @jli1126  This whole Hong Kong protest started because a Hong Kong guy named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, and stuff her body in her suitcase, before flying back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice for his crime, but Hong Kong has no extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to Hong Kong extradition laws. Do the HK protestors even know what they are protesting for? Have they read the bill and understood its contents in their entirety?
    15
  2326.  @suzygirl1843  An American asked an immigrant: "Why don't you go back to where you came from, if you don't like U.S domestic policy?" The immigrant replied: "Because U.S foreign policy is even worst, look what it did to my homeland!"
    15
  2327.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  You said: "A university does not want people in it employment that have these views. They probably also don't want 'highly intelligent' people making public statements in public which are contrary to fact." By now, everyone would have seen John Mearsheimer's "Why is Ukraine the West's Fault?" made available by University of Chicago. There's other universities such as Yale University where Vladimir Pozner gave a similar lecture "How the United States Created Vladimir Putin" so it's apparent that such universities allow people with such views to bring up such topics. I don't know which country your university is in, but I'm guessing you must be referring to a university in Australia. You said: "He knows it, otherwise, why would he delete his linked in profile" Maybe because LinkedIn is shutting down their service in China and pulling out? That could be one possible reason why your professor decided to delete his LinkedIn profile.
    15
  2328.  @TacticalMayo  That shows something really wrong is happening in the so-called "Land of the Free".
    15
  2329. According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. Doesn't Singapore's political system sounds remarkably similar to China's?
    15
  2330. +Sam Hofman Some of the US treaties are questionable, such as Hawaii fighting for independence from US but losing and being taken over by the US. US airbases in Okinawa Japan was built as a result of Japanese WW2 surrender, so you can't really say that US had Japanese permission. It as part of Japanese surrender condition. China does not have these treaties because it claimed those territories historically before international law of the sea was created.
    14
  2331.  @teddybearmonster  President Xi Jinping merely said that he would not rule out reunification of Taiwan with the mainland by force if necessary, then what action does he need to take? Taiwan hasn't made any declaration of independence, then what does President Xi need to do?
    14
  2332. It's the story of the Tortoise and the Hare. Without reaching the finish line, NATO (Hare) has already exhausted their sanction options on Russia and run out of weapons to send to Ukraine, while continuing to mock Russia for being "too slow". Russia (Tortoise) has weathered the sanctions yet is still making steady, incremental progress towards the finish line.
    14
  2333.  @richarde.halliburton8022  How is the "language, religion, and culture" being stripped away from people in Tibet and Xinjiang? Look up videos of Lhasa and you can see many religious Tibetans praying, performing full-body kowtows in worship, spinning Tibetan prayer-tops in their hands, and so on. Same goes for Xinjiang, you can see many Uighurs celebrating festivals with Uighur cuisine, dressed in traditional Uighur clothing, singing Uighur songs while playing traditional Uighur instruments. Have you actually been to Tibet and Xinjiang?
    14
  2334. Channel News Asian mostly repeats Western viewpoints, especially regarding the Ukraine conflict.
    14
  2335. Agreed. Sometimes, anti-China people will still stubbornly continue hating China, even after you expose the truth to them.
    14
  2336. Also, never ask Zelenskyy for receipts to see where the money goes.
    14
  2337. Gorbachev was the instrument that birthed the uni-polar world.
    14
  2338.  @katong1953  UT sensorship has certainly gotten worst.
    14
  2339.  @joeawk  Many of these ASEAN "bananas" are suffering from the subservient "colonial mindset" as a result of colonization. Even if these countries may have physically decolonized, the "decolonization of the mind" is not complete and needs more time to heal from the mental damage inflicted by the colonizer on the mindset of the colonized.
    14
  2340. I still find it baffling that even after being to China and receiving positive feedback from interviews with Chinese people about our government, she still claims "Something is not quite right" with the responses.
    14
  2341.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "They have unlimited friendship with a country that invaded Afghanistan, Syria, Georgia, Crimea, Ukraine." -It's the Soviet Union that invaded Afghanistan, not Russia. -The Russian intervention in Syria was on the Syrian government's request. -A 2009 EU-backed report revealed that it was Georgia that started the war with Russia -The 2014 Crimea Referendum revealed that an overwhelming majority (96.77%) voted to join the Russian Federation. -Ukraine War has been ongoing since 2014.
    14
  2342. That's what I've been saying all along, that Zelenskyy should sue for peace. But I remember you kept comparing Ukraine conflict to China being invaded by the Japanese when they are clearly different scenarios.
    14
  2343. China is also investing in sodium solid state battery technology which holds promise for its longer life span, increase range and faster charging rates compared to lithium batteries. Sodium is also cheaper than lithium, so the technology would make electric cars more affordable to the masses.
    14
  2344.  @de20  How isn't it true that "building biggest bridge=best bridge builder"? Bridges are marvels of engineering, built to cross otherwise impassable obstacles, over vast bodies or water, deep valleys and massive gorges. Bridges must be able to bear the weight of traffic flowing through, and distribute the load evenly among load-bearing struts and so on, the selection of materials, the weather conditions at the site, and many other factors and everyone knows that the bigger the bridge, the more engineering expertise is needed to ensure that the bridge spans pass the obstacle. Videos: World's longest sea bridge! Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge to boost logistics youtube.com/watch?v=3gLzWXxQkKs China Sets Record for World's Highest Bridge, Again youtube.com/watch?v=2jj7gH3569M World's highest glass bridge in Zhangjiajie, China https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gLzWXxQkKs Zhangjiajie Grand Canyon Glass Bridge Construction youtube.com/watch?v=T2HHh5ksUvI See how Chinese bridges are built youtube.com/watch?v=T7hdo9tL6u0&t=10 If you know of any other country that even approaches China's level of bridge building expertise, then I am happy to hear you opinion.
    14
  2345.  @Raumance  At a meeting with African leaders, Russian President Vladimir Putin has said that Russia withdrew its army from Kyiv last year because it was "asked to do so to create conditions" for signing a peace treaty. "Essentially, a draft of this [peace] agreement was agreed upon. But after the withdrawal of our troops from near Kiev, which we were asked to do to create conditions for the conclusion of the final agreement, the Kyiv authorities rejected all previous agreements." - Russian President Putin to African leaders.
    14
  2346.  @Raumance  When did you ever take a break from calling me naive, to explain anything at all? In all your posts, you've been deriding me for my views and calling me naive, just because my views happen to differ from yours. I've cited evidence to support my arguments, whereas you're continued to dismiss my points while citing nothing to support yours.
    14
  2347. The Americans lost the Vietnam war to poorly equipped, poorly trained Vietnamese peasants, who were only defending their homes, while the US troops were dying on foreign soil.
    14
  2348. Agreed. In the past, China was dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country just like many countries in Africa, but China found our road to success through building infrastructure like roads, railways, bridges, tunnels, so China is offering the same deal to African countries wishing to emulate China's path to success
    14
  2349. Marvel's Shang-Chi isn't really an example of China's soft power on the world, it's actually an American superhero film produced by Marvel Studios and distributed by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures, and China didn't really had anything to do with the production of that film.
    14
  2350. To be honest, it's not just American media. Even to most Chinese mindsets, the idea of a Russian is a blonde haired person.
    14
  2351.  @ljingjing  Who says using VPN in China is illegal? So many foreign companies come to China and set up shop here, and some of them require access to Western websites, so the govern grant a VPN license to these companies. Our schools and university students sometimes need access to Western literature for their education, and they use VPN to access it.
    14
  2352.  @rickyravani8834  Source＞ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053
    14
  2353. Western MSM overreact to a crisis in Ukraine, while neglecting coverage of ongoing atrocities that NATO and the US commit in Syria, Iraq, Palestine, etc. It's partially due to the seemingly racial discrimination against refugees without Anglo-Saxon features to those with it.
    14
  2354. @lincolnchaza9727  In the past five years, China has assisted Zimbabwe in building some of the monumental projects with grants, such as the new parliament building, the National Pharmaceutical Warehouse, and the High-Performance Computing Center for Zimbabwe.
    14
  2355. Westerners also made use of Chinese inventions like paper, compass and especially gunpowder in the past. Would the West been able to invent its modern technology if not for China?
    14
  2356. China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land, and still have agricultural surplus to export to other countries.
    14
  2357.  @elanor2123  You said: "It's sad that most people in China regard religion as unnecessary as untrue. In fact, I'm an atheist too." So when Chinese regard religion as unnecessary it's sad, but since you yourself are atheist, then who are you to judge Chinese who choose to be atheist? Can't you see the double standards? You yourself admitted that you're atheist, but when Chinese are atheist, it's "sad"? You said: "But the least the atheists can do for the people who believe in gods is to respect their beliefs." If a Christian country can promote Christianity within their lands, and an Islamic country can promote Islam in their lands, then by that same logic, can't an Atheist country promote Atheism in our own lands? China is officially Atheist under the Communist Party, then surely China has the right to promote Atheism, just as an Islamic country like Saudi Arabia, Turkey or Indonesia can promote Islam in their lands, right? I mean, imagine the possibilities of an atheist country. Less focus on religious superstition, and more focus on the science aspect and improving people's lives through hard work, rather than relying on some nameless God to save us all. You've admitted that you're atheist yourself, so can you see the benefits of atheism in a country? Since an Islamic country can promote Islam in their lands (same as a Christian country with Christianity), then can't an atheist country promote atheism in our lands?
    14
  2358.  @itslocane412  You're making the ad hominem fallacy where instead of addressing Scott Ritter's argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person himself.
    14
  2359. Westerners always complain about Chinese people are rude, spit in public, jaywalk, disobey traffic laws, drive through red lights, etc, so what this system hopes to achieve is to prevent such people from traveling overseas and becoming a nuisance to others.
    14
  2360. Many Chinese youth can also be found studying in overseas universities, and it would be fair to say that many Chinese youth know a lot about the West. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said about Western youths knowing about China.
    14
  2361. +Haruka ino You clearly said "also makes us glad that we did Nanking" isn't it?
    14
  2362. China's approach is to save lives at the expense of businesses U.S's approach is to save businesses at the expense of lives.
    14
  2363.  @rufanuf1  You said: "Well your "Chinese heritage" has little to do with the CCP and it's imperialistic ambitions." China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, while other ancient civilizations like Egypt, Rome and Mesopotamia eventually succumbed to history. Throughout our long history, China has always been under the authoritarian rule of Emperors and the Imperial Court. Even today, China is under the leadership of President Xi and the CPC, and this system closely emulates the system of ancient China.
    14
  2364.  @cabanacaterer  The population of Uighurs in Xinjiang grew by 25% from 2010 to 2018.
    14
  2365. In the 19th century, Britain was a colonial superpower. In the 20th century, the United States overtook Britain as a superpower. But from 1-1800 AD, China (and India) were economic superpowers, each making up around 21% of the world's global GDP. ... And it looks like in the 21st century, China is predicted to overtake the United States.
    14
  2366.  @HarrySmith-hr2iv  India's share of the world economy when the British first arrived on its shores was around 23%. By the time the British left, it was down to below 4%. Why? Because India had been governed for the benefit of Britain. Britain rise for 200 years has been financed by its depredations in India. The Industrial Revolution in Britain was actually premised on the de-industrialization of India. For example, India's local weaver industries had been dismantled and the raw materials shipped to Britain, so that manufactured cloth could be sold back to India from Britain. Video: Dr Shashi Tharoor MP - Britain Does Owe Reparations https://youtu.be/f7CW7S0zxv4
    14
  2367. NawtilisMaelis Egypt and Greece are still there, but like I said, the "civilization" isn't there anymore. Like you said, Europeans had many "civilizations" rise and fall isn't it? Why accuse Chinese people of being arrogant and brainless, for simply telling the truth? Chinese people are among the world's most intelligent people as studies shown, and Chinese people been recording history for 5000 years continually here. China did not have a "dark age" like Europe after fall of Rome, so why you accuse Chinese of not knowing history?
    14
  2368.  @nantakumaran9789  About the South China Sea, in 1958, the Vietnamese PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese, in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958.
    14
  2369.  @TacticalMayo  Vietnam lost around 30,000 - 42,000 soldiers, which is already greater than that of China's. And they were unable to stop the PLA's march to Vietnam's capital, Hanoi. Upon reaching Hanoi, the goal of the punitive expedition has been met and China had no plans to occupy Vietnam, which is why the PLA withdrew after declaring the path to Hanoi cleared.
    14
  2370.  @ChiefCabioch  According to an article published in The Atlantic by authors Deborah Brautigam and Meg Rithmire, their research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country.
    14
  2371.  @intothewrx  Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    14
  2372.  @shmuelba1  "When did the state of Palestine exist if it was occupied? " Palestine doesn't has to exist as a state to be considered occupied. For example, the Americas did not exist as a state before it was occupied and the Native Americans were eventually colonized. Same goes for the aborigine land in Australia and New Zealand.
    14
  2373.  @rpg1663  "not to mention that without hong kong, and all the trade during the last decades, China probably would be much behind nowadays" Without mainland China, it's likely that Hong Kong wouldn't have developed under 150 years of British colonial rule, since it is this access to mainland China's market that makes Hong Kong invaluable to the West.
    14
  2374. Once again, U.S special agent Ned has completed the mission. Now U.S is trying to frame China as the culprit behind Sri Lanka's woes.
    14
  2375.  @joshlewis575  Source: Wikipedia: CIA Tibetan program
    14
  2376.  @gulamog5041  Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for 30 years already?
    14
  2377.  @junebug8485  You yourself admitted that the U.S gotten involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Yemen War, how is the term "warmonger" inaccurate when describing the U.S? The fact remains that the U.S went to war with countries in the Middle East, so why is this term not accurate? Americans were initially not interested in the Gulf War, until testimony by a little girl (named Nayirah) emerged, claiming that Iraqi soldiers were taking incubators and leaving their baby occupants behind. The testimony was widely publicized, and was cited numerous times by U.S senators and President George H. W. Bush in their rationale to support Kuwait in the Gulf War. But it later turned out that the testimony was false, and that the alleged events did not occur. It was too late however, as the U.S had gotten involved in the Gulf War. The Iraq War was over President Bush's accusations of Iraq harboring WMDs, but after the Iraq War, no WMDs were ever found. According to Iraq Body Count, some 200,000 Iraqi civilians were killed as a result of the U.S war in Iraq. Even the UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan stated that the Iraq War was illegal and that it violated UN charter. Afghanistan wasn't responsible for 9/11, Osama bin Laden was killed in Pakistan. Yet the U.S occupied Afghanistan for 20 years, until the shambolic withdrawal from Kabul, causing panic among U.S allies stationed in Afghanistan. The democratically elected Afghan President Ghani fled the country with carloads of U.S cash. The 300,000 strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban in weeks with minimal resistance. Libya did not attack any NATO country, why was NATO involved in the Libyan War? Under Muammar Gaddafi, Libya was arguable Africa's most prosperous democracy until the NATO intervention reduced Libya to a failed state today.
    14
  2378.  @Aikúsoul  About the chip industry, humans are approaching the theoretical limit of just how small companies like TMSC can manufacture silicon-based chips. After which it would be physically impossible to make chips any smaller, and Moore's Law would be broken. However, alternatives like carbon-based chips using graphene, exhibit promising results such as better conductivity, better heat dissipation and better efficiency than the silicon-based chips used in TSMC, and mainland China is investing in carbon-based chip fabrication technology.
    14
  2379.  @MarkYeung1  Much of the Western Internet is full of fake news Because it's unregulated, literally anyone can put on a journalist cap and film whatever they want and pose as "news". Sometimes they copy fake news from one another, a single source like "accusations of genocide" by Adrian Zenz gets cited and repeated so many times, that people start believing these lies, because they claim Western Internet is unregulated. Whereas Chinese Internet is regulated to root out the fake news and unsubstantiated sources. And its actually "less dangerous" because many people (including Chinese) are skeptical about Chinese news, whereas many Westerners blindly believe Western propaganda even though its unsubstantiated.
    14
  2380. Exactly. China needs more pork anyway, so lifting the ban doesn't harm China. But Canada missed out on the opportunity to exert economic leverage.
    14
  2381. ​ @Kitten_Stomper The People's Republic of China was founded in 1949, so it's certainly not 50 years old.
    14
  2382.  @mayurk8697  You sound like the headlines about China from Western magazines since 1990 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    14
  2383. 知彼知己，百戰不殆。
    14
  2384.  @laserraiset3300  "神州 Shenzhou he just cheap paid propagandist, war happening allready in ukraine" So the priority is to end the conflict, and China has proposed a 12-point peace process for Ukraine conflict, of which Putin has agreed to. Then isn't it better for the U.S to cooperate with China on this plan to resolve the conflict peacefully?
    14
  2385.  @laserraiset3300  Again, China has to factor in many considerations when printing Yuan, such as China's economy, China's gold reserves, inflation, and so on, before deciding to print. The fact that even after all these considerations, China can still print trillions of yuan, is a sign of the government's confidence in our currency.
    14
  2386.  @laserraiset3300  "神州 Shenzhou so can you please reveal me what exactly china offering for ukraine ?" China is offering to hold peace talks between Ukraine and Russia, to bring about a peaceful resolution to the conflict in Ukraine. After President Xi's phone call with Zelenskyy, China will also send a delegation to Ukraine to hold talks with all parties on resolving the conflict.
    14
  2387.  @laserraiset3300  Saudi Arabia had indeed agreed to sell its oil in U.S dollars, but recently, the kingdom has decided to transact its oil in other currencies like Indian Rupee or Chinese Renminbi. If this continues, that the advantage that U.S enjoyed when Saudi Arabia priced its oil in dollars would come to an end.
    14
  2388. Taiwan today can stubbornly hold out because of perceived American support. But the U.S is in decline and China is rising, so eventually there will be a point when the U.S will have declined to no longer be able to challenge China's rise any more. And when that happens, Taiwan's backing is gone, and reunification can occur.
    14
  2389. New Zealand is part of the Five Eyes countries after all, and that's how U.S exerts influence over other countries through such groupings, like NATO, AUKUS and the Quad.
    14
  2390.  @MH-il1lk  Haven't you heard of the Uighur separatists? How much do you actually know about Xinjiang?
    14
  2391. Most non-Mandarin speakers also mispronounce "Xi" as "She". In fact, Xi actually sounds very much like the letter "C" phonetically. So if people want to pronounce his name correctly, all they need to do is say out the letter C (for China).
    14
  2392.  @IFrostillicus  But not with regards to Putin it has. Those Ukrainian children were evacuated from a war-zone into the relative safety of Russia. Recently Russia has started returning those Ukrainian children.
    14
  2393.  @buckduck8936  U.S Navy Warships have been coming within 12 Nautical Miles of the Paracel Islands and intruding into Chinese territorial waters. For example: 2022: USS Benfold sailed to within 12NM of the Paracel Islands. 2021: USS John S McCain sailed to within 12NM of the Paracel Islands. 2020: USS Barry sailed to within 12NM of the Paracel Islands. 2019: USS Wayne E. Meyer sailed to within 12NM of the Paracel Islands. 2018: USS Higgins & USS Antietam sailed to within 12NM of the Paracel Islands. 2017: USS Chafee sailed to within 12NM of the Paracel Islands. 2016: USS Curtis Wilbur sailed to within 12NM of the Paracel Islands. ... So it's the United States that's sending their warships from halfway across the globe to Chinese waters in the Paracel Islands.
    14
  2394. Russia's global integration may minimal compared to China's, but Russia supplies essential commodities like gas, oil, wheat and fertilizers, and the West sanctioning Russia has already caused food and fuel prices to increase in their countries.
    14
  2395. China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc, in developing countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan as well as African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, etc, even in the 21st century. The US is enacting regime change by bombing those countries and cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now it appears Assad of Syria and Maduro of Venezuela are next on this list. Just look at Iraqi Body Count Project to see how many Muslims America has eradicated.
    14
  2396. I heard that during Soeharto's rule of Indonesia, the Indonesian government regarded the Chinese Indonesians as a problem (Masalah Cina) and banned expressions of Chinese culture through language, religion, and traditional festivals in Indonesia. Also, the ethnic Chinese living in Indonesia were pressured to adopt Indonesian-sounding names.
    14
  2397. Trade is the language China is most proficient in. Military bases is the language that USA is most proficient in.
    14
  2398.  @ngawangyoga9258  Here's a photo of Old Tibet: Shackled Serf Tilling the Land with wooden tools. Source: Tibetan Buddhism: Serfdom to Emancipation mbplee.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/tibetan-buddhism-serfdom-to-emancipation/ The poverty, and the physical conditions and humiliating role of serfs within the Buddhist monasteries were no better within the monasteries than on the private estates. The Dalai Lama did not seem concerned with the welfare of the serfs who toiled to ensure the wealth and prosperity of the Lamas. Serfs served their masters from birth to death and were treated like livestock. Serfs could never be freed, and were often presented as gifts to other dignitaries or traded, sold or bartered for goods. That was exactly how slaves have been treated all over the world. If they attempted to escape, they would be flogged or even condemned to death and all their possessions taken away. Many were tortured by the primitive and cruellest methods imaginable. Rebellions occurred but when they were suppressed, their punishments were unimaginable to discourage others from following the same path. This barbarity was normal during that period of human existence, the middle ages. But in many countries, especially Tibet, the feudal serfdom continued to modern times (1959). So slavery in Tibet continued under the Dalai Lama rule until 1959 when the Communist Party of China finally abolished slavery in Tibet in 1959.
    14
  2399.  @complexnucleus1087  India invaded and annexed Sikkim, Jammu & Kashmir, Goa and even recently, India had border dispute with Nepal, resulting in Nepalese police open fired and killed 1 Indian near Bihar.
    14
  2400.  @stevenliew2507  The problem arises when some Chinese (but not all) exhibit the colonial mentality, worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture and harboring disdain for their own culture. They follow the West and prioritize freedoms and democracy, over things like family ties and improving their lives, and it is this that might lead to potential conflict in the Taiwan Strait.
    14
  2401.  @enzoh7763  Seems like a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that is fueling Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiments in the West towards Russia and China respectively. And it's having the effect of pushing both countries closer together.
    14
  2402.  @nickiseb8910  "神州 Shenzhou China is interfering wherever it can. Also in my country." Which country are you from? What has China interfered in your country?
    14
  2403.  @AmbietsRato  Historical baggage clearly impacts the relations between countries, and since both Russia and China have thousands of years of history (as well as having the most number of land neighbors in the world) there are bound to be disputes. In China's case however, China has settled land disputes with almost all our neighbors except for Bhutan and India. -In 1964, China and North Korea signed border treaty. -In 1991, China and Russia signed border treaty. -In 1962 , China and Mongolia signed border treaty. -In 1994, China and Kazakhstan signed border treaty. -In 1996, China and Kyrgyzstan signed border treaty. -In 1999, China and Tajikistan signed border treaty. .... You get the point.
    14
  2404.  @AmbietsRato  "My grandmother said that the key difference between the US and Russia was that the US went back home, while the Russians stayed." Are you kidding? The USA is by far the largest operator of military bases (400+ approx) in the world, in 85 countries. Russia has overseas military bases too, but they are mostly located along Russia's periphery. Because Russia is part of the landmass that is Eurasia, whereas the US is located across the Pacific Ocean.
    14
  2405. Chinese are no strangers to hard work in blue-collar jobs such as laborer (coolies), rickshaw drivers, farmers, chefs (esp. Chinese restaurants), laudromat workers. Not only that, but after Chinese complete their our education, we can take on white-collar jobs such as doctors, lawyers, dentists, engineers, programmers, scientists and so on. There is no work that Chinese aren't qualified or unwilling to do.
    14
  2406.  @jaycee9752  It's not really a matter of which country is ahead, it's a matter of who is thinking long-term and who is thinking short-term. If you don't plan your moves ahead of time, then your opponent might plan your moves for you.
    14
  2407.  @johnkrieg9368  It is true. Simply google "Colonial Mentality," and Filipinos pop up as the most prominent example of people with this mindset. Many studies have been conducted attempting to explain why Filipinos exhibit this behavior most strongly, yet you're claiming that isn't true at all?
    14
  2408. In a poll of nearly 7500 readers by the United Daily News (Taiwan Newspaper) website, 61% said the trip was not welcome as it may destabilise the Taiwan Strait. Only 38% welcomed the visit and said it had more advantages than disadvantages.
    14
  2409.  @andrenogueira5058  Taiwan was part of China during Qing Dynasty, The Republic of China 🇹🇼 that overthrew the Qing fled to the island after losing the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, even though the Nationalist Kuomintang held several advantages over the communists. Initially, the KMT had massive wealth (taxed from peasants) superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. Also, the KMT weren't separatists when they fled to Taiwan, they've always maintained the stance that Taiwan is part of China. Even till today, Taiwan's constitution states that the Taiwan is part of China and there have been no declarations of independence.
    14
  2410. Haven't you heard of the Nakba? That's where the whole affair truly started.
    14
  2411. In just 30 years, the government lifted 700 million people out of poverty in China. Just for comparison, the entire population of the African continent (Kenya, Ethiopia, Nigeria, etc) is about 1.2 billion people. So in effect, China lifted a number equal to half of Africa's entire population, out of poverty in decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. This phenomena has been called "unprecedented" in human history (even by some Western scholars) and is predicted to unlikely ever be reproduced elsewhere by other countries.
    14
  2412. I'm sure that had China not involve ourselves with those Pacific Nations, that the world would have forgotten they even existed. China has brought those Pacific Nations into the spotlight so that their views can be heard by the rest of the world.
    14
  2413. 我们将继续努力～为中国创造更清洁的未来。🇨🇳 We will continue our efforts to build a cleaner future for China. 🇨🇳
    14
  2414. The BBC purposely chose this method of audio work, in order to make the video appear more disconcerting the listener and induce additional feelings of anxiety and dread, in an otherwise normal experience. I mean, where's the supposed graffiti in the toilet? Did they really had to film the toilet with the lights off to make it more sinister? It's just a normal school where Uighurs get free education in both Mandarin and their own language, practice their culture, paint pictures, play instruments, play sports and learn job skills that improve their employability.
    14
  2415.  @Raumweiter  You said: "(Russia) supported military groups which even shot down a passenger airplane. Why exactly did this happen?" MH-17 was shot down over Ukrainian territory, how's that Russia's fault?
    14
  2416.  @SwedeenXBL  You said: "NATO hasn't expanded into 15 countries, countries have chosen to join NATO," So clearly those countries joining NATO indicate that NATO is expanding. You've just proven my point. Also, NATO was formed initially in response to rising Soviet military might, but after the USSR dissolution in 1991, NATO no longer serves any interests (except the U.S interests in maintaining its hegemony).
    14
  2417. Why should the government "close all wet markets"? Wet markets provide fresh food and produce at affordable prices to people in China and many other countries in Asia, Africa and South America also have wet markets of their own. So why should China close our wet markets?
    14
  2418.  @Rex-ww4cw  Uber failed in China because it wasn't as competitive as Chinese company Didi. Uber failed in Singapore because it wasn't as competitive as South East Asian company Grab.
    14
  2419. As the world's most populous country, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4 times that of USA, China has at least 4 geniuses to every 1 American genius. And this can be statistically proven. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Taken from the above: Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    14
  2420. Huawei holds 56,492 active patents on telecommunications, networking and other high-tech inventions worldwide, according to Anaqua's AcclaimIP, and is not afraid to use them.
    14
  2421.  @MarkYeung1  China banned Australian coal since 2020, and it's already 2021 so Australian coal has little to do with it.
    14
  2422. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    14
  2423.  @bens8013  Article: "Low Life Expectancy Continues To Plague Former Soviet Countries "_ More than two decades after the fall of communism, most former Soviet countries still have mortality rates significantly higher than those in Western Europe. This means that people in former Soviet States lived longer while part of the USSR
    14
  2424.  @nellyfrittata8319  Historically, "Anglo Saxon mission" refers to the spreading of Christianity in the Frankish Empire during the 8th century. Today, it refers to the spreading of Western beliefs throughout the rest of the world, including the colonial mentality among people who are not white.
    14
  2425. I feel bad for the other 5 Eyes countries i.e Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand, for just blindly hopping onboard the boycott wagon after the Biden Administration announced it was diplomatically boycotting the 2022 Beijing Olympics. The USA is literally taking the other 5 Eyes countries for a ride, and is now U.S has hopped off the boycott wagon.
    14
  2426. Covid-19 is like a global test that everyone has to take. China studied extremely hard for the exam and passed with flying colours and we are now celebrating our well-deserved graduation ceremony. Whereas Western countries had extra time to prepare for the test, yet many Westerners laughed at China's misfortune and mocked China's answers as too "draconian." Yet now they are accusing China of cheating, yet they are now blatantly copying China's homework after ridiculing them earlier.
    14
  2427.  @educateyourself3872  Can Vietnam and India ship their Made-in-Vietnam/India goods to the USA at the same volume as China can? China is home to many of the world's busiest ports that send Made-in-China goods all over the globe, and it is this infrastructure that makes manufacturing in China appealing.
    14
  2428. Those protestors "don't want jobs" because they are already being paid by the NED to say such things and they don't care about their fellow countrymen who are truly without jobs.
    14
  2429. Britain also need to part ways from Zelenskyy. The sooner, the better.
    14
  2430.  @parnamsaini4751  It just means that U.S should settle their domestic affairs first before planning their foreign policy.
    14
  2431.  @calinyx  "not sure if my response appeared." Weren't you the one who made the earlier boast that "Youtube gives you FREEDOM to have a discussion and have disagreements, on any topic"? yet now you're not even sure if your response appeared? Clearly censorship does exists on YouTube, despite your claim.
    14
  2432.  @smoochie3331  Is there something wrong with receiving money from China?
    14
  2433. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain and not fully returned. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    14
  2434.  @ErikGrimsmo  The Islamic invaders who conquered Xinjiang and converted the natives to Islam themselves did a similar. Why can't China teach Uighurs Mandarin, Chinese history as well as singing patriotic songs about China? Don't the Americans kids learn English at school, American history as well as singing patriotic American songs too?
    14
  2435. Another thing is that China's loans don't require your country to make changes to existing systems, whereas IMF and World Bank loans often come with strings attached, such as the requirement to make political reforms.
    14
  2436. China is willing to cooperate with the U.S over climate change. The question is whether the U.S is willing to do the same with China.
    14
  2437. @Xi The Poo Hey, you're the one who said that the 39 people who were found dead at the back of a truck in UK were all Chinese nationals. But Vietnam government has confirmed that all the 39 bodies were all Vietnamese nationals.
    14
  2438.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  I did mentioned that I took the analogy off Weibo didn't I?
    14
  2439.  @sablefilms  I think the OP is being sarcastic.
    14
  2440.  Tenzin Sonam  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    14
  2441. DF-41: World's longest range ICBM, with range of 15,000 km, surpassing US LGM-30 Minutemen range of 13,000 km DF-17: Carries Hypersonic Glide Vehicle (HGV) capable of attaining speeds above Mach 5 (5x speed of sound) DF-21: World's first operational Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile (ASBM) nicknamed "Carrier Killer" DF-26: Bigger variant of DF-21, with extended range. Nicknamed "Guam Killer" for its ability to reach Guam. JL-2: 2nd Gen Intercontinental Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) Able to reach U.S mainland. YJ-12: Sea-skimming supersonic missile (more stealthy approach). Can be launched by fighters and bombers.
    14
  2442. No other country has such a 1 Country, 2 Systems policy like China, allowing multiple political systems to exist within its border. It would be as though North Korea and South Korea agree to reunify as a single country, Korea, while allowing both sides to keep their respective governing systems.
    14
  2443.  @JM-gu3tx  The Diaoyu Islands are geographically located closer to China than to Japan.
    14
  2444. @@USA11111 Of course. China bought cheap Russian gas in Ruble/Renminbi and sold it at a premium to EU countries.
    14
  2445. An audio leak has revealed that German officers planning targeting a Crimean bridge with Taurus missiles. A bridge of which they admit has no military significance. Therefore, shouldn't the bridge be classified as a civilian target?
    14
  2446.  @georgeshibley9529  If your country don't control religion, then religion will start to control your country. In July 2009, Uighurs in Xinjiang suddenly started attacking Han passers-by, stabbing them with knives and throwing stones, overturning vehicles, breaking into Han businesses to loot and setting the place on fire, setting vehicles on fire and so on. Here is video footage youtube.com/watch?v=j1gbwrLXYDM
    14
  2447. Yes, just look at the difference in behavior of American diplomats like Anthony Blinken and Jake Sullivan compared with Chinese diplomats like Wang Yi and Yang Jiechi. The art of diplomacy in the U.S is deteriorating it seems.
    14
  2448.  @Freedom_and_Democracy  "When will Pan speak up about what is happening to Uygurs and Tibetans?" The population of Uighurs in China has grown from 3.6 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. Likewise, the population of Tibetans in China has grown from 2.7 million in 1953 to 7 million in 2020.
    14
  2449. I feel bad for the other 5 Eyes countries i.e Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand, for just blindly hopping onboard the boycott wagon after the Biden Administration announced it was diplomatically boycotting the 2022 Beijing Olympics. The USA is literally taking the other 5 Eyes countries for a ride, and is now U.S has hopped off the boycott wagon.
    14
  2450.  @barryford1482  About the South China Sea, the North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    14
  2451. She literally grew up in China, and she also learned English and studied in the West. Have you as a person ever been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    14
  2452.  @truenorthstrongandfree3699  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 which country would disrespect their founding father? Chairman Mao succeeded in reunifying our divided country where the previous Kuomintang administration failed under Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. The sexual practices you described are part of Taoism, which is part of Chinese culture. Scientific studies have shown that healthy sexual activities often resulted in a marked improvement of people's health, so there is some possible truth to the connection between sexual activity and vitality.
    14
  2453.  @jacwi8719  Why are people constantly interested in asking how much money other people make? You want to find work is that it?
    14
  2454.  @andrenogueira5058  But Uighurs and Tibetans who are born in the Chinese territories of Tibet and Xinjiang are granted Chinese citizenship at birth, so how are they not Chinese?
    14
  2455.  @abbotsful  It's from a 2010 Forbes article entitled: Why Google Is Quitting China and it elaborates on how Google lost the majority market share to it's Chinese rival Baidu. Because Baidu was introducing more innovative features that Google didn't offer on its own Chinese search engine.
    14
  2456.  @ghian696  Colonial mentality also continues to affect many former colonies, such as India and even Hong Kong. When I spoke Mandarin in Hong Kong, some Hong Kongers (but not all of them) treated me coldly. But when I speak English, many Hong Kongers started warming up to me. Decolonization will not be complete without the decolonization of the people's minds.
    14
  2457.  @iz1287  Hong Kong extradition bill has been formally withdrawn so why Hong Kong protestors continue to protest? And virtually every news sources labels HK protests as protests, so who's calling them riots? If those arrested rioters commit vandalism, arsonist, breaking windows, security cameras, traffic lights, and damaging HK MTR stations, setting shops on fire, then they are, by definition rioters so why should HK government set them free? How to establish commission of inquiry into police conduct and use of violence, when the protests haven't ended? BTW, when Hong Kong was still a British colony, the 1956 HK riots resulted in 59 deaths while the 1967 HK riots resulted in 51 death. Yet after the handover, in this 2019 Hong Kong riots, there have been zero deaths thus far so aren't the Hong Kong Police demonstrating incredible restraint? Why should Carrie Lam resign? Resigning does bit solve the problem it only makes it worse. Carrie Lam should remain in power and fix this problem she started herself, instead of taking the easy way out by resigning. The root of this problem is the Hong Kong extradition bill and since the bill has been formally withdrawn, then what are the protestors continuing for? What is the endgame for the protestors? I don't see any winning way out, even when Carrie Lam is open to dialogue and negotiations.
    14
  2458.  @speedybball0287  About alleged "one million Uighurs in detention" where do you get this figure of 1 million Uighurs? Turns out this figure came from 2 unreliable sources, one of which only interviewed 8 Uighurs on what their estimated number of Uighurs in re-education schools were, and then they extrapolated the figure to arrive at the figure of 1 million Uighurs in detention. Source: Claims that China has detained millions of Uyghur Muslims are based largely on two studies. A closer look at these papers reveals US government backing, absurdly shoddy methodologies, and a rapture-ready evangelical researcher named Adrian Zenz. thegrayzone.com/2019/12/21/china-detaining-millions-uyghurs-problems-claims-us-ngo-researcher/ While CHRD states that it interviewed dozens of ethnic Uyghurs in the course of its study, their enormous estimate was ultimately based on interviews with exactly eight Uyghur individuals.
    14
  2459.  Muhammad Ariq Muafan  According to World Tourism Rankings, China is the 4th most visited country in the world, after France, Spain and the United States. In Asia-Pacific, China is the most popular tourist destination, surpassing even other Asian destinations like Japan, Korea, India, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, etc. International tourist arrivals in Asia-Pacific (2018) 1. China (62.9 million) 2. Thailand (38.3 million) 3. Japan (31.2 million) 4. Hong Kong, China (29.3 million) 5. Malaysia (25.8 million) 6. Macau, China (18.5 million) 7. India (17.4 million) 8. Vietnam (15.5 million) 9. South Korea (15.3 million) 10. Singapore (14.7 million) ... Source: World Tourism Rankings: Asia-Pacific wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings#Asia-Pacific
    14
  2460. Chinese will help build you world's most epic Chinatown in your country.
    14
  2461. Indeed. And now Beijing is officially the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both the Summer Olympics (2008) and the Winter Olympics (2022).
    14
  2462.  @RyuRaza  Agreed. If the United States truly cared about Muslims then the U.S General responsible for the drone strike wrongly killing Afghan family of 10 (including children) should take responsibility for his mistake.
    14
  2463. Sounds like it's straight out of the NED playbook.
    14
  2464. Some people also confuse Taiwan with Thailand too.
    14
  2465. China still has control over Inner Mongolia 内蒙古 though. If Mongolians do participate in a war, they may attempt to take back control over Inner Mongolia, or China may attempt to incorporate Outer Mongolia back.
    14
  2466.  @smallderick9099  The US uses Made-in-China solar panels.
    14
  2467. That's why some Caucasian men like Asian women, because they exhibit traditional feminine virtues, such as obedience, softspoken, not interrupting their hubbies, etc. If it were Caucasian women, they would tend to dominate their men and wear the pants in the relationship, which some Caucasian men, simply do not like. Its just an observation that's all.
    14
  2468.  @phatrick8848  So why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to the _People's Republic of China_🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Defeating the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT, yet despite all their initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China. And North America is a continent not a country. So while Canada and USA are in North America (don't forget, there's another continent called South America), PRC and ROC both claim that they are China under the One China Policy and that Taiwan is part of China.
    14
  2469. It's America's Garfield versus the cat from Deng Xiaoping's quote: "It doesn't matter whether a cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice."
    14
  2470. Syan Reeze Since when did Italy joined US petition to ban China? Italy has denied a report it will ban China's Huawei Technologies and ZTE Corp from playing a role in building its fifth-generation mobile phone network. Source: Italy denies it will ban Huawei, ZTE from its 5G plans reuters.com/article/us-huawei-europe-italy-idUSKCN1PW0LV
    14
  2471. What about British people eating RABBIT stew?
    14
  2472. The anti-China side love to use the same old excuse of "I'm not anti-China, I'm just anti-CPC" to defend themselves and justify their anti-China stance. But the truth is that they don't care about China's interests, nor do they actually want to see China succeed that's all, yet they pretend they care about Chinese people, when they don't.
    14
  2473.  @Something-tz2vw  "China should leave Spratley islands alone, everyone knows they belong to Philippines for the most part." Vietnam PM Pham van Dong acknowledged that Spratly and Paracel Islands are within Chinese territorial waters in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. ... Source: (Wikipedia: File:1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai)
    14
  2474.  @Something-tz2vw  You said: "Not even Taiwan (part of China) claims all of them and never have." Taiwan island claims an even larger area than mainland China. In 1947, the Republic of China (i.e Taiwan) published the 11 Dash Line encompassing the Spratly and Paracel Islands. In 1952, Mao decided to remove two of the dashes, to arrive at the current 9 Dash Line claimed by the People's Republic of China. But till today, the ROC government still uses the 11 Dash Line. You said: "Shenzhou. Vietnam is one of 4 countries who claim these islands." Then how can you make the claim that "everyone knows they belong to Philippines for the most part."? Those 4 countries are challenging Philippine's claim over the Spratly Islands.
    14
  2475. Yes, the political candidates need lots of $$$ which is why the rich U.S corporations support them.
    13
  2476. The EU had wanted India to stop buying Russian gas, and the Indian Foreign Affairs minister replied that India's total purchase of oil from Russia in a month is less than what Europe does in an afternoon.
    13
  2477. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? ...
    13
  2478. ​ @ashpatel2505  Like many Hong Kongers, many Indians too (but not all) tend to have the "Colonial Mentality", of worsshipping Anglo-Saxon culture, while harboring a disdain for non-white culture (including their own). Both HK and India were former British colonies after all, and the education system really did a number on the minds of their people. So much such that even long after British left those territories, the people's minds still remain colonized.
    13
  2479. Many South East Asian countries were former colonies of the West, and hence the locals tend to suffer from a lingering "colonial mentality" long after decolonization. The "decolonization of the mind" needs to take place to purge their minds of the slave mentality, otherwise their actions will only continue to serve their former masters.
    13
  2480.  @deschan2246  "why built so many military hardware over short period?" A big country with a weak army will only invite foreign powers to invade. That's why China needs to build up our military hardware to be on pare with the strongest powers to act as a deterrent against potential invaders.
    13
  2481.  @daomingjin  You said: "2500 at best, before Emperor Qin shi huang, china wasn't even a unified country." You are viewing China through the European lens as a nation state. But China is not just a country, it's a civilization state. Chinese history doesn't just begin after Emperor Qin Shi Huang unified China. The European model (Westphalian system) assumes that each state has exclusive sovereignty over its territory, whereas the Chinese model is about cultural unity despite displaying significant cultural diversity, across centuries of history and a large geographic space.
    13
  2482.  @theone8189  Agreed. When drought struck Taiwan, the island's wafer fabrication industry also took a hit, since chip manufacture requires millions of gallons of water a day, so Arizona doesn't seem a good choice to transfer TSMC technology to. And yes, once the transfer is complete, then it's possible that the island is of no further use.
    13
  2483. ​ @nico-cr5fv  China seeks win-win cooperation, while the US only sees a zero sum game.
    13
  2484. ​ @adamrosendahl8090  YouTube censorship is certainly upping their game.
    13
  2485. Here's a Chinese analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family, which in turn open up a path to her ex-husband's doorstep. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    13
  2486.  @GMK189-f2k  What makes you think no one in China believes in the government? According to a long-term study by Harvard University and Ash Centre, it has been revealed that around 80-90%of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    13
  2487.  @FamiliarAnomaly  Reports indicate so far that China's economy is steadily evolving towards being more consumption-driven.
    13
  2488.  @vanhuvanhuvese2738  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during the Qing Dynasty. Just look up maps of Yuan and Qing Dynasty, and Tibet was part of China's history (as well as a part of China today). (Same with Inner Mongolia, it became part of China after the Mongols conquered Song Dynasty China and founded Yuan Dynasty).
    13
  2489. While deteriorating US-China relations might pose an immense challenge, I'm confident China will pull through.
    13
  2490.  @dertythegrower  In China, three quarters of the respondents in a survey were optimistic about the future according to Statista.
    13
  2491.  @HeresMyView  Additionally, I think the current ongoing Ukraine crisis is further inflaming the Red Scare factor in the West. Sadly, many ethnic Russians living in the West are experiencing harassment and discrimination. Russian athletes are banned in the Olympics, Russian sportsmen are not allowed to participate in competitions unless they denounce their motherland. Russian musicians, composers, dancers and artists are also facing similar discrimination if they refuse to denounce their homeland.
    13
  2492.  @jasonbaxter3658  Because investigations are always ongoing that's why new theories keep emerging. And most scientists (even Western scientists) have agreed that Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market (华南水果海鲜市场) wasn't the origin, it was imported in from elsewhere.
    13
  2493.  @xpro2009  You said: "A lifestyle choice. More than cultural; the benefits and convenience of modern ways/methods and technology." China is a modern nation with all the convenience of technology such as smartphones (i.e Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, etc), social media (i.e WeChat, Weibo, Douyin, Bilibili), mobile payment (i.e Alipay and WeChat pay), Internet companies (i.e Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, ByteDance, etc) and even electric vehicles (i.e BYD, Geely, SAIC Motor, etc). But where are all the famous companies from the Philippines in comparison? If anything, it boils down to the "colonial mentality" that's effectively holding back the people of the Philippines.
    13
  2494.  @io2068  No term limits? You're talking about Germany right?
    13
  2495.  @carljohnson45  Indeed. In fact, from 1863 and 1869, roughly 15,000 Chinese railway workers helped build the transcontinental railroad in the U.S. But they were paid less than American workers and lived in tents, while white workers were given accommodation in train cars due to policies and perceptions at that time.
    13
  2496. Beijing is now the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both the Summer Olympics (2008) and the Winter Olympics (2022).
    13
  2497. Hong Kong had been under authoritian British colonial rule for over 150 years, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was a British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover back to China, did Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So shouldn't the people of Hong Kong be grateful to the mainland, that they finally get to vote in elections?
    13
  2498.  @junebug8485  The American CDC tested American blood samples dating back to 14 Dec 2019, and detected the presence of antibodies. If it takes around 3 weeks for an infected person to develop antibodies, that means it was present in America at least in Nov 2019. Yet it fell on China to report this instead of the U.S?
    13
  2499. If the leader has shown to be capable and competent, then I see no problem with leaving him in power for a while longer, to maximise the benefits to China.
    13
  2500.  @altbinhax  Exactly. The silicon chip industry posed significant barriers for China's entry, not withstanding additional U.S restrictions on chips. And since silicon is approaching the end of its theoretical lifespan, the next option would be to replace silicon chips with carbon-based chips, and China recently make several breakthroughs in carbon-based chips. Video:youtu.be/OOy-iHPGkjI
    13
  2501.  @elanor2123  Here's a list of Hydroelectric Power Stations in Tibet -Ngari Hydro Power Station (阿里水电站) -Pangduo Hydro Power Station (旁多水电站) -Zhikong Hydro Power Station (直孔水电站) -Bayu Hydro Power Station (巴玉水电站) -Dagu Hydro Power Station (大古水电站) -Jiexu Hydro Power Station (街需水电站) -Zangmu Hydro Power Station (藏木水电站) -Jiacha Hydro Power Station (加查水电站) -Lengda Hydro Power Station (冷达水电站) -Zhongda Hydro Power Station (仲达水电站) -Langzhen Hydro Power Station (朗镇水电站) -Changbo Hydro Power Station (昌波水电站) -Suwalong Hydro Power Station (苏洼龙水电站) -Batang Hydro Power Station (巴塘水电站) -Lawa Hydro Power Station (拉哇水电站) -Yebatan Hydro Power Station (叶巴滩水电站) -Boluo Hydro Power Station (波罗水电站) -Yanbi Hydro Power Station (岩比水电站) -Gangtuo Hydro Power Station (岗托水电站) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region Before this, under the 14th Dalai Lama rule, majority of Tibetans had basically no access to electricity, streetlamps, Internet, WiFi, telephones, computers, appliances, electronics, so can't you see how much life for Tibetans has improved the Communist Party of China? Yet you still claim the CPC did not play any role in China's success?
    13
  2502.  @Madame702  On 10 March, Iran and Saudi Arabia signed an agreement, brokered by China, declaring their intention to end a hugely destructive rivalry that has stretched over decades and fuelled conflicts across the Middle East.
    13
  2503.  @calinyx  In the past, China used to harvest the organs of prisoners on death row, but it's only done with the permission of the prisoner or their family members consent. But as of 2014, China has abolished this practice and the number of organ transplants in China is among the lowest in the world.
    13
  2504.  @calinyx  Funny how you boasted about YouTube's "freedom" to discuss any topic, yet all your comments regarding organ harvesting have been shadowbanned and aren't visible to the public.
    13
  2505. Here's an analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Crimea had opted to rejoin the father. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they still gave Ukraine a false sense of hope. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    13
  2506.  @arturganczarski500  You said: "The west is not afraid of China, Shenzhou. The world is just disappointed and worried, seeing this teenage boy who does pushups in a gym..." This ain't no teenage boy. China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt eventually succumbed to history. Throughout our long history, China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise of fall of numerous empires, and yet China has survived the oftentimes violent passage of time to arrive in the modern time relatively intact, whereas even the Republic of Rome eventually crumbled. You said: "...and thinks now he can take on everyone in the neighborhood." You should be glad that China is merely doing push-ups and not actually starting fights at the moment (it's the U.S that picked fights in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, etc) and China reserves the right to self-defense. The events of the Century of Humiliation has taught China that a big country with a weak army would only invite foreigners to invade it, so a big country needs a strong army to act as a deterrent.
    13
  2507.  @arturganczarski500  You said: "Jealousy and envy is a Chinese thing... You will destroy yourself like all empires did, only faster, because all you have is technology when your soul is already dead." Such vitriol coming from a Westerner, especially one who claims jealous and envy is a Chinese thing. Your whole statement is a prime example of the intense xenophobia exhibited by much of the West towards China, you've literally described China as shameless and morally bankrupt, hypocritical, a liar, and a host of other insulting terms. Have you questioned where your apparent hatred towards China stem from? You're literally exhibiting the symptoms of Yellow Peril, despite claiming earlier that you've never felt superior to Chinese, so why pretend this phenomena doesn't exist in the West?
    13
  2508. For much of history, China always been economic power, according to Angus Maddison's research, claiming that from 1 AD to 1800s, China and India have world's largest GDP. Only in the last 200 years, did Chinese and Indian economies lose out to USA and UK. What China is undergoing today is actually more of a rejuvenation instead.
    13
  2509.  @catmandu6776  "神州 Shenzhou Genocide of Uyghur Muslims," What Uighur genocide? The population of Uighurs in China has actually grown from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China Yet the Western allegations of Uighur genocide still persist? When the population of Uighurs in China actually tripled in size over the years?
    13
  2510. Recently, Huawei unveiled a brand new triple foldable phone, the Mate XT.
    13
  2511.  @张晓海-h1o  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    13
  2512.  @张晓海-h1o  Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    13
  2513. In US pop culture, catchphrases like "F**K THE POLICE" are extremely popular and all it does is promote disregard for authority and make it difficult for policemen to do their jobs. So why should China follow the West in this regard? Its Westerner's choice (and grave) if they want to continue degrading their societal values.
    13
  2514. Also, China and India have also reached a deal to settle the border dispute.
    13
  2515.  @mojito4493  About democracy, China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    13
  2516. China has spoken up and firmly supports Kazakhstan in maintaining stability and stopping violence. youtu.be/FVIEFvLtt0U
    13
  2517. The U.S mainstream political discourse is sadly lacking in rational and sensible points, like those put forth by Cyrus.
    13
  2518. Americans seem more interested to sacrifice long-term benefits for short-term gains. Whereas Chinese are willing to sacrifice short-term gains for long-term benefits.
    13
  2519.  @andrenogueira5058  Here's a sampling of China's long term plans, but this is list is non-exhaustive and there may be more plans in store. 2025: China aims to move away from producing cheap low-tech goods and upgrade the manufacturing capabilities of Chinese industries. 2030: China aims to set forth a possible development path for China that would result in attainment of the status of a "rich country" by 2030. China's Long March 9 craft should be ready for us by 2030, capable of carrying over 100 tons, making it suitable for crewed expeditions to the moon or autonomous trips to Mars. 2035: China aims to create a blueprint for the Chinese government and leading tech companies to set global standards for emerging technologies, such as 5G, Internet of Things (IoT), and artificial intelligence (AI). China aims to make all of its space launch vehicles reusable. 2045: China aims to build a "space elevator" that would lower the cost of sending equipment to space. 2050: China aims to fully surpass the United States both economically as well as militarily by this point.
    13
  2520.  @HarrySmith-hr2iv  "भारत एक शौचालय है You talk rubbish. When I've travelled in north west China I saw white Chinese people. " How does that counter भारत एक शौचालय है 's argument? He/she's obviously referring to the time when India was a British colony, how does that link to white Chinese people in Northwest China? You said: "And chained to servitude you say.....the reality is you have to respect your boss, otherwise he won't pay you." Workers can quit if they don't like their bosses. But India's previous status as a British colony meant that the worker cannot even afford to quit their job, because Britain colonized India, and you can't quit being colony unless the colonial master agrees to relinquish their ownership over their colonial territories. Even if India is physically decolonized, the 'decolonization of the mind' still takes some time to heal from, and this is the "servitude" then binds Indians that are still trapped in a colonial mindset.
    13
  2521.  @J.M.254  Can you get other countries to recognize your claim? Because countries all over the world recognize the One China policy that Taiwan is part of China.
    13
  2522.  @ColoniaMurder20  "神州 Shenzhou we all know about that story.. we're not kind of people who living in the past.." Is that so? Then why'd you bring up the aborigine people in Taiwan in the first place? I've already shown that the current Taiwan aborigine were descended from farmers from mainland China that migrated to the island 5,000 years ago.
    13
  2523.  @ColoniaMurder20  "dont you know many filipinos serving in U.S. navy? they're currently in Southeast Asia patroling in SCS.." So why is the U.S Navy sending warships and aircraft carriers from halfway across the globe to the South China Sea? U.S warships even sailed through the Taiwan Strait for crying out loud.
    13
  2524.  @songrunner3027  You said: "China is doomed. The next few years will vindicate that prediction." 1990. China's economy has come to a halt. The Economist 1996. China's economy will face a hard landing. The Economist 1998. China's economy’s dangerous period of sluggish growth. The Economist 1999. Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. Bank of Canada 2000. China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. Chicago Tribune 2001. A hard landing in China. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas 2002. China Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. Westchester University 2003. Banking crisis imperils China. New York Times 2004. The great fall of China? The Economist 2005. The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. Nouriel Roubini 2006. Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? International Economy 2007. Can China avoid a hard landing? TIME 2008. Hard Landing In China? Forbes 2009. China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. Fortune 2010: Hard landing coming in China. Nouriel Roubini 2011: Chinese Hard Landing Closer Than You Think. Business Insider 2012: Economic News from China: Hard Landing. American Interest 2013: A Hard Landing In China. Zero Hedge 2014. A hard landing in China. CNBC 2015. Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. Forbes 2016. Hard landing looms for China. The Economist 2017. Is China's Economy Going To Crash? National Interest 2018. China's Coming Financial Meltdown. The Daily Reckoning. 2019. China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? BBC 2020. Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. NY Times 2021 Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. Bloomberg 2022. China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n. Bloomberg. 2023. No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. Bloomberg ... But it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong
    13
  2525. Good for making the Military Industrial Complex richer.
    13
  2526.  @TacticalMayo  The People's Liberation Army literally fought all the way to Hanoi and Vietnam was unable to halt China's advance. But in the end, China had no desire to occupy Vietnam, and the goal of the expedition was punitive in nature. That's why PLA withdrew after declaring the path to Hanoi clear.
    13
  2527. NED represents the United State's Need to Exert Dominance over other countries.
    13
  2528. Brian is certainly one of a kind. He makes sharp, astute political observations that cut through the "fog of propaganda" and best of all, he does the research to back up his claims. He's like a beacon shining through the darkness, enlightening us on the real geopolitical issues.
    13
  2529.  @Teochewtuahang  Even Indonesian President Soeharto called Chinese living in Indonesia as "Chinese Problem" (Masalah Cina) and banned expressions of Chinese culture through language, religion, and traditional festivals. The Chinese living in Indonesia were also pressured to adopt Indonesian-sounding names.
    13
  2530.  @EstanislaoSantino-xk8uz  Is there something wrong with me posting comments here? I thought you were all about free speech?
    13
  2531.  @mcshitums9362  "神州 Shenzhou not when people are killing themselves in those same cities" Do you have proof of such a claim? I mean, the U.S has only 4% of the world's population, yet they are home to 25% of the world's covid deaths, shouldn't this statistic be alarming in of itself?
    13
  2532. These young people were mostly students at the time of Umbrella Movement and they tend to be idealistic, following textbook ideals and living in the world of education, instead of the actual real world. Wait till they get a taste of real life when they graduate, find a job, get married, get an apartment, and settle down. As students, they have so much free time, and can get swept up in this political movement, but look at those working adults in HK, who have a job to do, mouths to feed, families to take care off, bills to pay and so on. They are the ones actually living in HK and they know HK's real political situation, not these young idealistic folk.
    13
  2533. Indians also scream "JAI HIND!" in their own language too.
    13
  2534.  @kl9518  Agreed. Some people in Hong Kong (not all) still suffer from "colonial mentality" long after decolonization. The "decolonization of the mind" needs to happen to undo the effects of colonization on the minds of the colonized.
    13
  2535.  @tenzintsenpey5274  What makes you think 5,000 years of Chinese history is destroyed? China has many historical monuments like the Great Wall of China, the Forbidden City, the Tomb of the First Emperor, the Grand Canal (world's longest canal). Have you actually been to China and visited our historical sites for yourself?
    13
  2536. Brahmos is only supersonic missile, whereas China has hypersonic missiles like the DF-ZF, that been tested 7 times and is capable of reaching speeds over 11,000 km per hour, bypassing even the most complex of missile defense systems, allowing China to hit targets anywhere in the world within an hour. Source:China successfully tests hypersonic missile rt.com/news/341172-hypersonic-missile-test-china/
    13
  2537.  @garymcmillan6943  China has transformed from a poor, starving country in the past into the world's 2nd largest economy (largest if you go by GDP PPP), the factory of the world, having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the CPC.
    13
  2538.  @QuentinKLEau  Australia is closer to Asia than America is from Asia, so if war breaks out in Asia, it's going to be Australians that suffer, not so much the Americans. Hopefully more Australians realize the absurdity of going to war with China for the U.S's sake
    13
  2539. India: "We have the world's largest supply of thorium reserves!" China: "Look what we found!"
    13
  2540.  @cspdx11  Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai had even proposed the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence (和平共处五项原则) to define China-India relations and to settle our border dispute. But Indian PM Nehru refused to negotiate, instead he pursued an aggressive "Forward Policy" of building military outposts at our disputed border, including beyond the McMahon Line and into actual Chinese territory itself.
    13
  2541. Worst thing is that his audience are like the passengers in the car, going along with the driver who hasn't got a clue or understanding about what he's doing.
    13
  2542. Americans need to face the fact that without China's help, USA would have zero chance of dialogue with North Korea, and only its sanctions to deal with North Korea. If Trump wants to take all the credit for China's efforts, then why don't Kim just visit Washington directly, instead of Beijing?
    13
  2543.  @grahamt5924  There's literally no way to distinguish between Western countries when there is no daylight between the U.S and other Western countries. Whether it's the Five Eyes (US, UK, Canada, Australia, NZ) or NATO, or AUKUS, they all serve the U.S interests in maintaining its hegemonic rule, so of course the Western countries get "lumped together".
    13
  2544. Perhaps it makes sense in context, only because the West has clearly wronged China in the past, that they ask themselves such a question. After all, if I were the West, I would ask myself the same question, whether I can trust a country that I've wronged before.
    13
  2545.  @MRXi0  Yes, the first is military and the second is economic. That's precisely why we have to say no to one and yes to the other.
    13
  2546.  @TacticalMayo  There clearly is a relationship, why deny its existence? Even though US-China relations have deteriorated to their lowest point in recent years, the fact that there is still dialogue, provides hope that relations might someday improve.
    13
  2547.  @stevendrysdale1067  Hong Kong today has their own government separate from the mainland government, their own HK passport, their own HK currency, even their own HK flag 🇭🇰. Same goes for Macau 🇲🇴 as well, under the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy.
    13
  2548. If you people claim USA will defend ROC, then why USA did nothing against Russian annexation of Crimea from Ukraine except impose sanctions? I already have proof of USA impotency in such affairs, so why do you people still believe that USA will come to Taiwan's aid? Another example is North Korean missile flying over Japan and America can't do anything about it, even when USA has defense treaty with Japan. Many countries observe the One-China Policy, so if ROC declares independence then PRC can reclaim Taiwan as under that policy, ROC is rogue state of China. If USA or other countries join in this war, then it would be regarded as interference in a civil war in China, since they observe One-China Policy. It is not in other countries favour to destroy their relations with China by recognising ROC independence. So what makes you think that other countries will recognise Taiwan independence and what gives you people the confidence that USA will come to ROC's aid?
    13
  2549. So you mean ROC is allowed to claim all of mainland China as belonging to them, including Tibet and Outer Mongolia, according to this source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg But somehow, PRC is not allowed claim Taiwan? Why applying double standards for ROC and PRC here? Taiwan technically claims all of mainland China as belong to them, so why can't PRC do the same to Taiwan?
    13
  2550.  @jp95js  China is committed to investigating the possible origins of Covid-19 in Wuhan, we are the only country in the world that allowed WHO investigation team to arrive and investigate our country. But China's objection is towards WHO team revisiting markets and labs that they previously investigated before, during the 1st investigation.
    13
  2551.  @milesbennettdyson6667  China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd highest military budget. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-China propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    13
  2552. During the Cold War, the world came to it's closest to outright nuclear war, but this crisis was averted thanks to the actions of a Russian submarine officer. Whereas there wasn't much hesitation when it came to Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
    13
  2553.  @richarde.halliburton8022  In Germany, you can't even perform the Nazi salute without getting arrested. Source: Chinese tourists arrested for Hitler salute in Germany bbc.com/news/world-europe-40842853 You can do that salute here in China, no problem. Every country has their own topics that are sensitive and whatnot, and China is no exception.
    13
  2554.  @danharold3087  The U.S is the one sending warships from halfway across the globe to within 12 NM of China's territorial waters in the Paracel Islands. Here's a list of U.S Navy incursions: 2022: USS Benford sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2021: USS John S. McCain sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2020: USS Barry sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2019: USS Wayne E. Meyer sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2018: USS Higgins and USS Antietam sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2017: USS Chafee sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2016: USS Curtis Wilbur sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands.
    13
  2555.  @koblongata  Mao Zedong exported food, because the local provincial governments grossly exaggerated crop yields to Chairman Mao. When Mao personally visited the farms, the local government had people transfer stalks from dying fields to healthy fields, to give off the appearance of a "bumper harvest" to Mao, so Mao believed that there was surplus crop to export to other countries. Because the local provincial governments deliberately exaggerated the crop yields to Mao. But once the famine was discovered, China wanted to import food from other countries, but the USA placed embargoes on countries to prevent them from selling food to China (such as Australia).
    13
  2556.  @seewahleong8459  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Statista: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    13
  2557.  @ngawangyoga9258  About pollution in Tibet, Chinese workers build hydroelectric powerstations in Tibet to supply clean, renewable energy to Tibetan homes for warmth during chilling winters, electricity for lighting, appliances and electronics. Here's a List of hydroelectric powerstations in Tibet Autonomous Region: Ngari Hydro Power Station[1] 阿里水电站 Pangduo Hydro Power Station[2] 旁多水电站 Zhikong Hydro Power Station 直孔水电站 Bayu Hydro Power Station 巴玉水电站 Dagu Hydro Power Station 大古水电站 Jiexu Hydro Power Station 街需水电站 Zangmu Hydro Power Station 藏木水电站 Jiacha Hydro Power Station 加查水电站 Lengda Hydro Power Station 冷达水电站 Zhongda Hydro Power Station 仲达水电站 Langzhen Hydro Power Station 朗镇水电站 Changbo Hydro Power Station 昌波水电站 Suwalong Hydro Power Station 苏洼龙水电站 Batang Hydro Power Station 巴塘水电站 Lawa Hydro Power Station 拉哇水电站 Yebatan Hydro Power Station 叶巴滩水电站 Boluo Hydro Power Station 波罗水电站 Yanbi Hydro Power Station 岩比水电站 Gangtuo Hydro Power Station 岗托水电站 …… Source: List of hydroelectric powerstations in Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region#Hydroelectric
    13
  2558.  @SagittarianArrows  The thing is, where is Australia going to acquire the necessary nuclear fuel to power their submarines, without violating nuclear proliferation since Australia is a non-nuclear state?
    13
  2559.  @MarkYeung1  China's spending is still nowhere near the US's.
    13
  2560. Here's a Chinese analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family, which in turn open up a path to her ex-husband's doorstep. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    13
  2561.  @itzapeezacake580  China has granted visa-free to countries (including France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, etc) allowing travelers from those countries to stay in China for 15 days. Many visitors made use of this opportunity to visit China and have uploaded videos of their first impressions visiting Chinese cities.
    13
  2562.  @MarkYeung1  It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiment in the West against Russia and China. And it's having the effect of pushing both countries closer together than we've ever been before historically, even Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi made the remark that the Russia-China relationship is rock solid.
    13
  2563.  @Zephyrianos  Those cities are gradually being filled up. Millions of people migrate from the rural countryside to the towns and cities every year in China, and over time those empty cities will get filled up. For example, Kangbashi in Ordos, Inner Mongolia, was once filled with newly built but vacant apartment buildings. But according to the 2020 census, Ordo's Kangbashi District was home to 366,779 inhabitants. All that's needed is time.
    13
  2564. +ArchesBro South Korea had that one dictator, Park Chung Hee, but under his brutal leadership, South Korea progressed rapidly, and has been ranked by the public as the greatest South Korean president, for sustaining the Miracle on the Han River, which reshaped and modernized South Korea. Taiwan was ruled 50 years by authoritarian, Imperial Japan and later by authoritarian single-party Kuomintang, for almost its entire lifetime, and had been under martial law for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under KMT leadership, Taiwan flourished, until another party DPP took over KMT in 2016 (2 years ago) and that was when Taiwan economy enter a slump. Even the last economic tiger, Singapore, was ruled its entire life by authoritarian single party PAP for over 50 years, and look at where Singapore is today. Together, these four countries are known as the Four Asian Tigers for their economic growth under such authoritarian governments.
    13
  2565. Why is it that that Western media overlook the good things that Mao Zedong did, and just concentrate on the bad? Shouldn't history be about being neutral and observing both the good and bad things people did? Despite Mao's failed policies, he unified China under communism in 1949, even when the previous KMT administration (1912 - 1945) failed to unify China. During KMT administration of China, Tibet broke free of China and much of China was ruled by warlords instead. But why Westerners just ignore all the positives and just focus on the bad things that Mao did?
    13
  2566.  @performancefluid3666  But since you accept that the German Chancellor has effectively no term limits yet it's is advantageous for Germany to do so, then why can't you accept the fact that China abolishing the presidential term limits, also confers the same advantages in long term planning as in Germany? Why the double standards for German Chancellor having no term limits and China having no term limits? I have previously said that having a two-party system like USA isn't advantageous, because the Republicans and the Democrats rather fight each other and sabotage each other's plans, rather than fight for America's future. China having a one-party system allows China to implement policies with speed, an advantage that multi-party political systems do not get to enjoy. … You said: "but you are chinese wumao and you will never admit publicly that some things ain't good in china." Why not attempt to refute my points rather than accusing me of being a wumao? Because I present logical points to support my arguments?
    13
  2567.  @UnimpressedGoose  Why are you resorting to insulting me personally now? I don't resort to insulting you just because your views may differ from mine.
    13
  2568. If you claim Taiwan is a country Jenkins, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations? Is there some force that's stopping Taiwan from joining the UN like an independent country can?
    13
  2569. Even the U.S's closest ally, Saudi Arabia can see which way the wind is blowing and changing directions accordingly.
    13
  2570. China and Russia are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and its "allies).
    13
  2571.  @MarkYeung1  "Ukraine is not a vassel state of Russia." But Ukraine has become a vassal state of the US.
    13
  2572.  @AmbietsRato  "It is the Russian forces and their mercenaries who committed atrocities against civilians," Even before Feb 2022, Ukrainian forces have been shelling Donbas region and targeting civilians houses since 2014. According to UN report, some 13,000 people have been killed since 2014, including 3,300 civilians. Close to 90% of conflict-related civilian deaths have resulted from indiscriminate shelling of residential areas. " Zelensky is the democratically elected president of Ukraine," Zelenskyy was elected because he promised to bring peace to Donbas. But not only did he failed to deliver on his promise, but Zelenskyy has banned opposition parties and consolidated the media into a single government-owned entity. Zelenskyy is also cancelling elections for next year, so how is this behavior considered democratic?
    13
  2573.  @calinyx  Haven't you heard Mike Pompeo's famous words "We lied, we cheated, we stole"? Yet you're accusing China of sponsoring cheating (without proof) when such words have been uttered by a US official?
    13
  2574.  @dp01452  How did U.S President Biden's trip to Saudi Arabia go? Did he came home empty handed?
    13
  2575.  @namelesssnitchy  Decoupling will result in the U.S growing more isolated from the rest of the world.
    13
  2576. @comment sense Likewise, America is dependent on Made-in-China goods. Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc, cheap so that the cost of living in America is lower than it should be. Think about the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to affordable Chinese good. Money saved that can then be spent on other things like cars, housing, luxury brands, etc. Isn't that why many Americans often flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money?
    13
  2577.  @daywalker0988  In African countries for example, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports etc, in African countries. China has done much to develop African countries in just decades as compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa that are sponsored by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Poty Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China youtube.com/watch?v=TtduKDpy4oc
    13
  2578. Once in a thousand years, Mother Nature let's mankind know who's really in charge.
    13
  2579. Sadly, these logical and rational voices from the West are in the minority.
    13
  2580. @Rob Hunter China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    13
  2581. Agreed. Given that Meng Wanzhou was eventually released from Canadian custody and returned home safely, I believe one day in the future, Huawei too will be vindicated in the West, and eventually taken off the blacklist. Perseverance is the key to success here.
    13
  2582. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    13
  2583.  @tory6733  Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. ... ... But its already 2019, and China's economy is still going strong, so why continue believe Western anti-China propaganda, when their economic predictions been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    13
  2584.  @SwedeenXBL  You said: "NATO now serves as a nuclear alliance, which Russia has now proven it's existance and why previous Soviet countries have joined NATO." How has Russia proven its existence? Russia has not launched any nukes against any other country, the only country to have done so is the United States of America. You said: "It's defensive for reasons I've already mentioned, once again do you actually have a reading disability?" What reasons have you given? I've stated that NATO is not a defensive organization, given its involvement in the bombing of Yugoslavia, and its involvement in Afghanistan War and Libyan War. You said: "I'm not gonna defend NATOs bombing of Yugoslavia just as little as i'm gonna defend USA in general, it's a disgrace on NATO." So NATO is clearly not a defensive organization, since NATO bombed Yugoslavia in 1999, yet why are you claiming that it is? You said: "The difference here is NATO isn't invading neighbouring countries to force them into NATO, which Russia is." Russia isn't trying to invade any country to force them into NATO, what are you talking about? In fact, Russia has repeatedly raised concerns over NATO's continued expansion into other countries. You said: "Yes, I'm well aware Ukraine uses Russian equipment but unfortunately for you the investigation concluded that the BUK in question came from the 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade." The investigation's conclusion does not conclude that the BUK missile was fired by that specific brigade, only that it had possible origins from that brigade that's all. Just because a missile was traced back to a specific unit, does not mean that it was launched by said unit. In response, Russian President Vladimir Putin stated that Russia would analyse the JIT conclusion, but would acknowledge it only if it became party to the investigation. You said: "Would you allow the NATO countries involved and trust their investigation about civilian deaths during the Yugoslavian bombings? Didn't think so." Well, why was Ukraine allowed into the investigation into the shooting down of MH17, yet Russia wasn't invited? The shooting occurred near the Russian border, yet why wasn't Russia allowed to become party to the investigation?
    13
  2585.  @chunchun-maru  Singapore's Russian gasoil imports last hit an all-time high of 95,000 tonnes in December 2021, but the Asian oil hub received only 20,000 tonnes of the industrial fuel from Russia in 2022, Refinitiv data showed.
    13
  2586.  @SunilMeena-do7xn  If you want to talk about unity, then it was Mao Zedong that unified China. Mao is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country, where the previous Kuomintang government failed to do for the Republic of China 🇹🇼 for 37 years. If not for Mao, China today would most likely still be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves instead of the strong and unified country we are today.
    13
  2587.  @qingdaocitizen7957  Traces of Covid-19 have been found in Barcelona sewers in Spain, since March 2019 9 months before the outbreak in Wuhan even began. Source: Reuters: Coronavirus traces found in March 2019 sewage sample, Spanish study shows reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-spain-science-idUSKBN23X2HQ Spanish virologists have found traces of the novel coronavirus in a sample of Barcelona waste water collected in March 2019, nine months before the COVID-19 disease was identified in China, the University of Barcelona said on Friday.
    13
  2588. China bagged many gold medals in the Olympics, so it's not as though China is unable to train athletes. But China has priorities.
    13
  2589.  @ColoniaMurder20  It's funny how you proclaim that Han Chinese are all about conquest, yet Han Dynasty remained confined on the main continent of Asia. Yet over 2000 years ago, even before Han Dynasty, the ancestors of Austronesians expanded across the South China Seas to Taiwan, Philippines, Indonesia, etc, settling on those islands and colonizing the indigenous peoples living on those islands and introducing Austronesian culture to the natives. Now the original natives living on Phillippines and Indonesia have been replaced/assimilated by the Austronesians. Isn't the Austronesian expansion far more extensive than the Han Dynasty, which is only limited to land expansion?
    13
  2590. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US and its "allies.")
    13
  2591. The Biden Administration seems to be targeting Russia rather than China. But who knows, Biden's true stance towards China is unknown.
    13
  2592.  @MarkYeung1  Every state has their own National Security Law to prohibit sedition, secession and foreign interference, even the USA have their own National Security Law. According to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 (香港基本法第二十三條), Hong Kong shall enact laws to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government, or theft of state secrets, to prohibit foreign political organizations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region, and to prohibit political organizations or bodies of the Region from establishing ties with foreign political organizations or bodies. So the Hong Kong National Security Law was a long time coming, given that it was supposed to be done according to Basic Law Article 23.
    13
  2593.  @d9918  The Philippine Coastguard (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) had shot to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng (洪石成). Whereas Chinese coastguard had not open fire on any Philippines fishing vessels.
    13
  2594. Here's a Chinese analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family, which in turn open up a path to her ex-husband's doorstep. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    13
  2595. Seems like some organizations are able to pass for NGOs because the US government creates and funds organizations that pretend to be independent, so that NGOs can list them as their sponsors without triggering the label of being a governmental organization.
    13
  2596. The colonizer not only colonize territory, but also they also colonize the minds of the local people. Mental colonization continues to persist among the people in former colonies like the Philippines, India and even Hong Kong. Such people display a preference for Anglo-Saxon culture, while harboring disdain for any non-Anglo culture (including their own). Even after the colonizers left, the minds of the natives remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters.
    13
  2597.  Gaylord Manlove  Canada always welcome to extradite those so-called criminals back to China.
    13
  2598. There's even a Chinese joke about the name Facebook sounds like fēisǐ bùkě (非死不可) in Mandarin, which translates to "Must Die!" or "Have to Die!". But seriously, I hope FB (Meta) changes their ways, not just their name.
    13
  2599.  @jamesgathings6364  Pretending not to know would be an advantage. But not knowing the language would put yourself in a disadvantage.
    13
  2600. Many Indians (but not all) are still suffering from a "colonial mindset" that's been imposed on India as a result of British colonialism. Even though Britain has since physically decolonized from India, the "decolonization of the mind" among many Indians is still ongoing, with some Indians still blindly worshiping their former colonial masters.
    13
  2601.  @Anonymous------  That's like giving the US a taste of their own medicine.
    13
  2602.  @uselesshero.official  India and China are world's two most populous countries in the world, so we face population problems like poverty, shortage of food, not enough schools, not enough jobs, and we are both countries that suffered under Western colonialism. Indians complain about being maligned, that's alright, it's their viewpoint, but look at the sheer vitriol directed at China. China's reputation suffer just as much as Indian, but most Chinese people shrug it off, tighten up our belts, roll up our sleeves and go to work making our country better, step by step. No one can complete halt the flow of negative news about India and China, and complaining about it won't help. Better to work to make the country better, like what Chinese are doing for our country.
    13
  2603. To Cyrus, the deaths of elderly folk due to Covid might seem justified. But Confucian culture values the lives of the elderly, even at the cost to the economy. Loss of money and income is tragic yes, but money lost can eventually be earned back. But once elderly folk lost their lives, no amount of money can buy back lives that have been lost due to Covid, that's why China still prioritize lives over businesses.
    13
  2604. Many Chinese living in Taiwan still have families back home on the mainland, and so there are some who don't want separation with China.
    13
  2605. D&G made condescending advertisements about Chinese usage of chopsticks to eat Italian cuisine, that's why many Chinese celebrities canceled their contract with D&G and Chinese decided to boycott their brand.
    13
  2606.  user-bz4tw3bu9u  Decoupling is impossible, even western diplomats said so.
    13
  2607.  @floopyfool  You said: "imagine china claiming all south china sea" China's claims to the South China Sea Islands were published back in 1947 by the Republic of China 🇹🇼 in their 11 Dash Map (of which the 9 Dash Line map by the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 is based upon). Back then, nobody objected to China's claim, even the U.S supported China's claims to SCS. The U.S even sent warships like USS Decker (renamed ROCS Taiping in Chinese navy) to help China liberate those islands from Japanese rule. One of the South China Sea Islands was renamed Taiping Island in honor of the warship that liberated it.
    13
  2608. @Luciuswolf China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    13
  2609.  @abyyy490  You said: "Weapons don't win war strategies does." That's why the mainland uses the strategy of economic integration with Taiwan and will only exercise the military option if all other options are exhausted. Also, time is on China's side. Taiwan's ability to hold out against reunification stems from (perceived) US support. But it's no secret that the US is in decline and China is rising. Once the US declines to the point where it is unable to challenge mainland China's rise, the support for Taiwan will evaporate and reunification is inevitable.
    13
  2610. Here's a Chinese analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    13
  2611. ​ @MarkYeung1  In China, the government is above religion and exercises authority over all religion in China. Religious freedom is protected under the Chinese constitution, but it doesn't mean that religion can overrule the government's policies. If the religious doctrine or activity causes harm to others or to the state, then Chinese government reserves to right to get rid of it. Otherwise, people are allowed to practice their religion in China.
    13
  2612.  @johnfrancisco1851  Anti-Chinese sentiment is growing in the West, more Westerners are telling people of Asian descent to "Go back to China" and the number of attacks against Asians are increasing in the West.
    13
  2613.  @MarkYeung1  What has Taiwan suddenly got to do with this? Has such a referendum taken place? Last I heard, the majority of the people of Taiwan (87%) want to maintain the status quo. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China.
    13
  2614. Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out stems from perceived U.S support. But it's no secret that the U.S is in decline and China is rising. Time is on the mainland's side, and as long as peace prevails, the U.S will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise, by then Taiwan's backing would evaporate. With U.S support gone, Taiwan's reunification would be inevitable, so the mainland just needs to be patient.
    13
  2615.  @Wynn-fr6oz  That will only happen if Russia's security needs are first addressed, which means no NATO entry of Ukraine.
    13
  2616. Because for the past 200 years, they've never had a non-Western country be able to match them economically as well as militarily. Until today.
    13
  2617. +Daniel Vedberg Sekulic Tibet has been part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongolians conquered both Tibet and Song dynasty China, and made them part of Yuan dynasty China. And since when did any country recognized Tibetan independence at all? USA, UK, France, Russia, Germany, etc, they all accept Tibet as an autonomous region of China. Life for Tibetans did improve, and I already quoted various examples to prove my case. But you just claim that life didn't improve in Tibet, then why don't you show exactly how? Tibet broke free of Qing China in 1912 and was reincorporated back in 1951, so for 39 years it was beyond China's control, but it doesn't mean that it was recognized as its own independent state by other countries. Which country recognized Tibetan independence then during that period? In 1951, The Dalai Lama signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet and affirmed Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. You said so yourself that "What kind of Tibetian have the economy to buy these things since the majority is at best farmers the standard of life in tibet have been quite the same for a long time." But now, Tibetans have the money to spend on cars, electricity, smartphones, computers, Internet and WiFi, so why do you still claim "Did life improve in Tibet?" so aren't you contradicting yourself a bit here? Yes, its true that there is usually poor Internet reception and mobile phone coverage in mountainous regions. But thanks to the mainland building telecommunications infrastructure in Tibet, people and tourists in Tibet can enjoy decent mobile phone coverage and Internet, even in such a remote location like the Himalayas. And Tibet didn't even have electricity or gas in their houses, prior to 1951. Yet you still claim "Did life improve in Tibet?" Since when is Tibet off limits to foreigners? So many tourists, both foreign and local, visit Tibet every day to pray at its temples during pilgrimages, go on mountain hikes, and so on. Ever since the Qinghai railway was built to connect Tibet to rest of the world, the tourism industry in Tibet has expanded rapidly and slowly becoming part of its economy. Why don't you yourself drop by Tibet one day and see for yourself what life is like over there? Self-Immolation originated in India not Tibet, and the radical practice spread to Tibet over the years. Despite what Western media keep portraying about self-immolations in Tibet, since 2008, there have only been 100 or so self-immolations in a decade and these people are usually indoctrinated to risk their life for Western political agenda. I mean, why would any sane person burn themselves for long lost political cause? Why not work hard, go to school, graduate, get a job and start a family like most people do today? Some Tibetans may be radical in their beliefs, but that doesn't mean all Tibetans want that sort of life. I mean, look at self-immolation in India for example, where as many as 1,451 and 1,584 self-immolations have been reported in 2000 and 2001, respectively. What's up with that? I mean, 1,000+ self-immolations in a single year, whereas in Tibet, it is an accumulated 100+ self-immolations over a period of 10 years (2008-2017) so which is worst? Where did you get your sources about poverty statistics in China? According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat, considering that China is world's most populous country, yet managing to achieve 6.5% poverty and 96.5% literacy given such huge population. I mean, at least I am talking about real life examples, using statistics to support my case, but all you do is claim "Did life improve in Tibet" without going on to elaborate your point.
    13
  2618.  @slovackoinfo  You said: "You should thank the West" Western companies did not "develop China" for China's sake, they set up shop in China because of China's cheap, skilled labor as well as the promise of an enormous market in which to sell their finished goods. When foreign companies first set up shop in China, workers were earning just 10 cents to every dollar of profit that Western companies like Apple and Nike made. It was through painstakingly saving up billions of cents over the course of years, that China managed to lift 800 million people out of poverty and into the middle class.
    13
  2619. M.J.D. But what the man said in the interview was 在习主席的带领下 (with President Xi's guidance or leadership) not "Under President Xi's rule", so Asian Boss either translated it improperly, which change the man's meaning altogether
    13
  2620. Ukraine was once the center of world attention. Then Oct 7 happened, and now Ukraine has been largely abandoned in the media, and Palestine-Israel is now the center of world attention.
    13
  2621. Initially, Japanese automakers copied from the Western companies as well. The 1917 Mitsubishi Model A was based on the Fiat A3-3 design. In the 1930s, Nissan Motors' cars were based on the Austin 7 and Graham-Paige designs, while the Toyota AA model was based on the Chrysler Airflow. Ohta built cars in the 1930s based on Ford models, while Chiyoda built a car resembling a 1935 Pontiac, and Sumida built a car similar to a LaSalle.
    13
  2622. The only solution is to dismantle the Military Industrial Complex.
    13
  2623.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. does SMIC sell chips worldwide like Intel, AMD, and Nvidia?" Of course it does. China’s largest chipmaker SMIC is now the No. 3 foundry in the world. This places SMIC only behind Taiwan’s TSMC and South Korea’s Samsung Foundry. Chips made by SMIC are found in automobiles, smartphones, computers, IoT technologies and more.
    13
  2624. USA doesn't support Thai monarchy's anti-defamation laws. Also.... USA supports Saudi Arabian monarchy in getting rid of "an enemy of the state". Part of U.S double standards...
    13
  2625.  Charles Schmid  Ted Cruz supported the January 6th Capitol Hill insurrection too.
    13
  2626. Also a crackden, given that traces of a white powdery substances were also found in the White House.
    13
  2627.  @marysylvie2012  So you see nothing wrong with your country (Tunisia, I presume) providing aid to India during natural disasters. But when China assisted Tunisia in the development of projects including water conservation infrastructure, solar lighting initiatives, shrimp aquaculture centers, even dispatching medical teams to Tunisia, this is being viewed as "corrupt people who sold you out to China"?
    13
  2628. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in Australia.
    13
  2629.  @Jake12220  The thing is that U.S businesses in the Solomons were protected by Australian police, so why were U.S businesses protected and not Chinese businesses?
    13
  2630.  @buymecola1  Many Filipinos tend to have "colonial mentality". Not only were Philippines' lands colonized, but also the minds of its people were colonized. Even after the colonizer left, the people's minds remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. It's like Stockholm Syndrome.
    13
  2631. The bat soup coronavirus origins myth have long been debunked by experts. Source: Is bat soup a delicacy in China? We debunk a rumour on the origin of the coronavirus observers.france24.com/en/20200203-china-coronavirus-bat-soup-debunk-videos-viral-palau-indonesia
    13
  2632. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a bleak outlook of the future.
    13
  2633. Not just USA don't recognize Taiwan but UK, France, Russia, Germany and most of the world don't recognize Taiwan as its own independent country.
    13
  2634. China sees win-win mutual gain, while the US only sees a zero sum game.
    13
  2635.  @xuzhen1512  Many anti-China people seem to make the same old excuse of "I'm not anti-China, I'm just anti-CPC" to defend themselves and justify their anti-China stance. But in truth, they just can't stand to see China succeed under a government that's not Western democracy that's all.
    13
  2636.  @americanpatriot126  Why do you think the Communist Party of China is a threat to the world? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    13
  2637. This channel is a ray of light from a lighthouse cutting through the fog of war and illuminating the way forward.
    13
  2638. Chinese politicians fulfill promises first before getting elected. American politicians make promises first before getting elected.
    13
  2639.  @karenlin4215  Agreed. That John Mearshehimer video on "Why is Ukraine the West's Fault?" has seen a surge in views. I also recommend video materials like Oliver Stone's 2016 documentary Ukraine on Fire and also Yale University video featuring Vladimir Pozner on How the United States Created Vladimir Putin if people want to find out more about background leading up to the Ukraine crisis.
    13
  2640. Indonesia is world's largest Muslim population country and Suharto banned expressions of Chinese culture through language, religion and culture and the ethnic Chinese were pressured to adopt Indonesian-sounding names. But Westerners don't care what happens to Chinese in Muslim countries, they only care about Muslims in China.
    13
  2641.  @nurainiarsad7395  There's nothing fundamentally wrong with the actual cartoon character, Winnie the Pooh, but there are underlying racist connotations (as I've explained earlier) when comparing the character to a Chinese man.
    13
  2642. USA support Saudi Arabian monarchy in getting rid of "an enemy of the state". But USA don't support Thai monarchy in anti-defamation laws.
    13
  2643.  @Planetarian43  You said: "Politically it's simply absurd though." Singapore has been governed by a single-party authoritarian government under PAP for 58 years, similar to how China has been governed by the CPC for 74 years. Don't you see the similarities in the political systems of both?
    13
  2644.  @phatrick8848  If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. And there is no country known as Taiwan, the ROC constitution specifically states that ROC is China and that Taiwan is part of China.
    13
  2645. The USA sent their troops to participate in 2019 Wuhan Military Games just shortly before the outbreak began.
    13
  2646.  @yh774  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053
    13
  2647.  @nragtime4990  What good has Western-style Democracy given to the Philippines? Many Filipinos tend to have the "colonial mentality". Such people tend to view their own culture, language and values as 'backward' and try to adhere to the culture, language and values of their colonial master (and this includes notions like Western-style democracy.) The mentally colonised do not adapt ideas to their own reality, instead they try to live in other people's reality (namely in that of their former master's) and it's akin to a kind of Stockholm Syndrome.
    13
  2648. Many in the Philippines tend to have the colonial mentality. Colonial mentality is defined as the perception of ethnic and cultural inferiority as a result of colonization. It corresponds with the belief that the cultural values of the colonizer are inherently superior to one's own (which is not necessarily true).
    13
  2649. ​ @Something-tz2vw  In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg
    13
  2650.  @jihigh482  That's because China is playing a different board game. For anyone who has experience playing both chess and Go (Weiqi), it becomes immediately apparent how the two games differ strategically. Chess is a game of straightforward tactics while Go is a game of subtle incremental strategy. In other words, China is playing the long game.
    13
  2651. I personally have never truly felt that they love China. Its hard feeling to describe, but look at their faces, their expressions, their mannerisms, when they talk about China and Chinese people. It just feels fake and insincere to me, and I am sure some other Chinese have noticed too.
    13
  2652. In the West, media is unregulated, anyone can put on a journalist cap and pretend to report on another country (without having visited that country) get published without peer review, leading to a pandemic of fake news in the West. Whereas China regulate news outlets and CGTN uses primary sources where possible.
    13
  2653. Well said. And now Beijing is now officially the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both the Summer Olympics (2008) and the Winter Olympics (2022).
    13
  2654. +Erwin S Chinese workers earn only 10 cents for every dollar that the MNCs make. China slowly became wealthy after the accumulation of millions of 10 cents over the years. But can you imagine the profit made by the MNCs like Apple? By their nature, MNCs are not limited to countries. This is how Apples takes all the wealth away from Americans. Don't blame Chinese workers for the deal made with US companies.
    12
  2655. +nubkiller lol But there are people who never even been to China and they seriously believe everything China uncensored says about China.
    12
  2656. I've always felt China should work with Japan and Korea (and Taiwan) to form an alliance like the US (52 states) or the European Union (28 countries). We are diligent and intelligent people of culture who share more similarities than differences. Why should we see ourselves as inferior to US and EU? Some of the world's most developed cities are in East Asia, manufacturing technology like automotives, aerospace, biotechnology, semiconductors etc. What we need is an alliance that serves the interests of East Asians.
    12
  2657. Artic nations include Russia, US, Canada, Greenland and Norway. Trump: "We will annex Greenland!" Trump: "Also, Canada will be the 51st state!" Norway: "(Gulp)"
    12
  2658.  @JackRichardsonM8  NATO is not a defensive organization. They've been involved in wars in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Libya, etc.
    12
  2659. Agreed. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like USA is a threat to global peace and stability.
    12
  2660.  @MarkYeung1  "China is the best mediator since its friends with both of them." All the more the reason the West shouldn't treat China like an enemy, if they want China to mediate in the Russian special miltary operation.
    12
  2661. @Chishio Chishio You said: "He works for chinese government." Cyrus videos spread the positive message of Building Bridges, Not Walls between the US and China, so are you saying that the CPC endorses this peaceful message?
    12
  2662. Kazakhstan is in a strategic location, between Russia and China as well as being a participant in the Belt and Road Initiative, so no wonder it's a prime target for U.S.
    12
  2663.  @whateverexe  China is home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway TaihuLight 神威·太湖之光 and Tianhe-2 天河-2 and in the 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, as compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source: Now China outguns US in top supercomputer showdown zdnet.com/google-amp/article/now-china-outguns-us-in-top-supercomputer-showdown/ Supercomputers play an important role in research, and are used for computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion).
    12
  2664.  @danielong1153  Japan's hi-speed rail is fraction of China's, so it has less maintenance, whereas China has to maintain world's largest high-speed rail network and done good job of it so far. Besides hi-speed rail, China is home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight 神威·太湖之光 and Tianhe-2 天河-2 and in the 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance https://www.cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion).
    12
  2665. 1. Abe’s maternal grandfather was a Class A war criminal. 2. Abe insisted in going to Yasakuni Shrine that interned the ashes of all of these class A war criminals even when the Japanese Emperor Hirohito refused to. 3. Abe pushed for the amendment of Article 9 of the Japanese constitution, regarding its pacifist clause. 4. Abe came up with the idea of the Quad. 5. Abenomics has failed and that is why Japan’s debt is 230% of GDP and the yen is in a free fall since March.
    12
  2666.  @Raumance  "Shenzhou. And before WW2 started Hitler promised to not attack Soviet Union." Hitler is NOT the Soviet Union, so what's the whole point of your comparison? In fact, it was the Soviet Union fought against Hitler during WWII and the Russians inflicted the most casualties onto the Germans during WWII.
    12
  2667.  @lukei6255  People's Liberation Army fought all the way to Vietnam capital of Hanoi and Vietnamese troops could do nothing about it. But China decided we don't want Vietnamese territory (why conquer them, when it means more mouths to feed?) so PLA withdrew. And Vietnam invaded Cambodia and China was Cambodia's ally so why can't China come to the aid of our ally?
    12
  2668. US strategy: depleted uranium munitions. Russian strategy: deplete Ukraine's munitions. Like literally...
    12
  2669.  @everythingandmore5537  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    12
  2670. Hong Kong education system teach ancient Chinese history, but stops short of teaching 19th Century Opium Wars so the HK kids feel a sense of detachment towards the mainland. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    12
  2671.  @MarkYeung1  The problem is those overseas Chinese suffering from a "colonial mindset" and blindly worshiping Westerners and telling people to "thank the U.S government" because their minds haven't been decolonised.
    12
  2672. Every country have own fantasy books. What about England's legends of King Arthur? Do English people really believe a sword in a stone can only be pulled out by a true king? What about Greek legends of Achilles being invulnerable, except for his heed? Of course Chinese people don't believe that Chinese historical characters like Lu Bu or Guang Yu can fight an army by themselves.
    12
  2673.  @borisnegrarosa9113  "it's adapted to China's need to transport the natural resources out of the African countries." China has build infrastructure in Africa such as schools, hospitals, shopping centers and even stadiums, that have nothing to do with transporting Africa's natural resources out of African countries. While it is true that China does seek Africa's resources to fuel its economic growth, China is also forking out money and paying for those resources legally, unlike what the Western colonial powers have been doing in Africa for centuries prior.
    12
  2674.  @李梅烧烤泥轰豚  我们中国人平时对外都说自己不行的谦逊，让人感觉突然就能上月球上火星，这种感觉好像一瞬间，但其实这是中国人默默在背后付出的心血。就让他们继续看不起我们吧，我们更能安安静静的发展。
    12
  2675. The phrase "Banzai" 万歳 is actually from China and it means "Ten thousand years (of life to the Emperor)" or "Long Live the Emperor"
    12
  2676.  @currentchannel3452  If you claim Cyrus is somehow being paid by China to promote his peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" then isn't that a positive message for the world? U.S-China relations have deteriorated to their lowest point in decades, and a potential hot war would not only be disastrous for both our countries, but for the rest of the world as well. So isn't Cyrus message of "don't fear China" a good message to help diffuse the fear and paranoia towards China?
    12
  2677. China's Kubuqi Desert solar power plant is so advanced that it can even produce power at night The key lies in that it uses mirrors instead of solar panels. The mirrors rotate to focus the sun's rays onto the top of the tower (like a solar oven) and heating up the molten salt contained within. Molten salt is able to absorb and retain heat energy for a long period. Even after the sun sets, the molten salt heated throughout the day is still able to produce electricity even at night.
    12
  2678.  Gaylord Manlove  How is little frog considered racist?
    12
  2679. That's a lot of money spent by NED in Kazakhstan , do the ordinary American taxpayers know where their hard-earned money is going to?
    12
  2680.  @cchannel7857  Search for an article: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies (By Gregory Clark)
    12
  2681.  @chrishamlin5863  The CPC transformed China from previously being a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, into the world's 2nd largest economy today, the world's factory, having world's 2nd largest research spending, and a space-exploring nation. Why do you have a low opinion of it?
    12
  2682.  @ColoniaMurder20  Watch any documentary on the American-Phillipines War
    12
  2683.  @ColoniaMurder20  The American-Phillippine War resulted in 16,000-20,000 Filipino soldiers killed and 200,000–1,000,000 Filipino civilians died, and yet you as Filipino, are happy to prepare for war over a Chinese Island that's of no interest to the Philippines? And you think the U.S will help?
    12
  2684. Hopefully, the upcoming face-to-face dialogue between President Biden and President Xi would help diffuse the heated situation between our countries.
    12
  2685.  @ab7_92  Much love to Iraq from China. ♥🇮🇶🇨🇳❤
    12
  2686. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    12
  2687.  @dekumutant  China is already the world's largest robotics and automation market. China produces the most renewable green energy in the world, and China is also home to the world's largest high-speed rail network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen in terms of track length.
    12
  2688. I think the goal is not to topple regimes of other countries not following US system, but to topple countries that that simply don't agree with US stance or interests. For example, Saudi Arabia is authoritarian dictatorship with numerous human rights violations, yet USA is best buddies with Saudi Arabia because of oil.
    12
  2689.    Why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan?
    12
  2690. Taken from the Diplomat: The Shanghai Communique On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia... The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position.
    12
  2691.  @anirudhhattangadi3534  The root of the dispute is that the India-China border was demarcated by a British, Henry McMahon, foreign secretary of British India at that time. The McMahon Line was drawn without Chinese consultation as to where the accepted borders should lie between India and China, and ignoring historical boundaries. Many Indians (but not all) still have this "colonial mentality" where they worship Anglo-Saxon culture and therefore, adhere religiously to the boundary line drawn by the British, and that's why border talks between China and India do not yield positive results.
    12
  2692.  @csking6377  The colonial mentality continues to afflict the minds of many Filipinos (but not all). Even though Philippines has physically decolonized, the minds of many of its people remain colonized.
    12
  2693.  @richardvesey1909  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    12
  2694.  @martinjerald6000  "If so then israel should see to it they are kept demilitarised for the safety of the Jewish state" Does this demilitarization include the killing of civilians such as women and children who were seeking refuge in hospitals, refugee camps and schools?
    12
  2695.  @thefrontier2288  Guess which country has the world's largest number of covid cases and deaths?
    12
  2696. So Philippines wants to be the next Ukraine?
    12
  2697.  @bbj7383  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    12
  2698.  @junebug8485  Democracy has multiple meanings, of which one of the most common is a government by the people, for the people, of the people. Under this definition, the U.S is not a democracy, it's a plutocracy with a government by the 1%, for the 1%, of the 1%. Because the U.S government simply isn't able to deliver what the ordinary Americans want. Whereas in China, the Chinese government is able to deliver what the people want, so in this sense, China could even be considered more democratic than the U.S, given that our government is able to deliver what the ordinary Chinese want.
    12
  2699. With 1.4 billion people, China has the brainpower to come up with ideas and plans, as well as the manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality.
    12
  2700. Many Chinese are optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners (not all) are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    12
  2701.  @Tabula_Rasa1  Exactly. China has also invested a lot in electric vehicles and in fact, Chinese company BYD has become the world's seller of EVs, even more than Tesla.
    12
  2702.  @johnsmith1953x  It was a joint development between a Chinese research team from the Tianjin International Center for Nanoparticles and Nanosystems (TICNN) at Tianjin University, together with American researchers from School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology.
    12
  2703.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "20 million Chinese are being locked down now" Because unlike the USA, China is tackling Covid-19 by entering lockdown. Whereas in the United States, the Omicron variant is allowed free rein and U.S health system is getting swamped by huge number of cases.
    12
  2704. I'm guessing that most other countries tend to see the geopolitical conflict as primarily between USA and China, and don't expect to find themselves involved at all. That's why they never see it coming and wouldn't thought that they'll end up victims themselves.
    12
  2705.  @ShuCarolina  Who benefits from these plans if not China? The Communist Party of China (CPC, not CCP) is wholeheartedly committed to poverty alleviation efforts and according to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty; China's poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015, as measured by the percentage of people living on the equivalent of US$1.90 or less per day in 2011 purchasing price parity terms, which still stands in 2022. President Xi is committed to the idea of "Common Prosperity". Certain parts of China have grown rich and the government is seeking to distribute China's wealth from the rich developed Eastern port cities (i.e Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, etc) to the less developed rural Western regions (i.e Tibet, Xinjiang, etc).
    12
  2706.  @JohnBauman-h6d  About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    12
  2707. Many (but not all) in Asia also tend to suffer from the "colonial mentality" of worshiping Anglo Saxon culture and deriding anything "non-white" (including their own culture). Not only do countries need decolonization, but also their people's minds have to be decolonized as well.
    12
  2708.  @leonal522  People nowadays are glued to the their screens even in public. China's Metaverse aims to map cyberspace onto real space to facilitate integration. The U.S's Metaverse aims to isolate individuals in a cyberspace world separate from real space.
    12
  2709. Americans need to face the fact that without China's help, USA would have zero chance of dialogue with North Korea, and only its sanctions to deal with North Korea. If Trump wants to take all the credit for China's efforts, then why don't Kim just visit Washington directly, instead of Beijing?
    12
  2710.  @jamesrey3221  China took ready action to save as many lives as possible during the pandemic. Thanks to that, China can now reopen to the rest of the world.
    12
  2711.  @cspdx11  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Song Dynasty China as well as the Kingdom of Tibet and then incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. Centuries later, the Manchu conquerors did the same during Qing Dynasty. Tibet broke free of China in 1912, but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951.
    12
  2712.  @matthewmorgan7106  The OP didn't even mention anything about the Communist Party of China, so yet you're already labelling him/her as 50 cent?
    12
  2713. I've heard that during Suharto's rule, Chinese culture was suppressed in Indonesia. Chinese language, religion, and traditional festivals were banned during this period and the ethnic Chinese were pressured to give up their Chinese names and adopt Indonesian-sounding name.
    12
  2714. Maybe they faked the whole thing, and that man is just an ordinary Uighur, and it was actually VICE News that followed him around and filming him in different angles, then claimed made a false claim that he was somehow following them.
    12
  2715. 🎵Them Americans drinking whiskey and rye, while South Korea singing "This'll be the day that I die." 🎵
    12
  2716.  @MarkYeung1  Patrick Lancaster was literally filming in Donetsk and Luhansk even before this whole Russo-Ukraine crisis began. Check out his YouTube Channel, he has videos of trench warfare in Donbas dating 5 years ago (back in 2016) and even on life in Crimea after they voted to join the Russian Federation after 2014.
    12
  2717.  @techystt  China's adult literacy rate is 99%. India's adult literacy rate is 78%. USA's adult literacy rate is 79%.
    12
  2718.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "with the government crackdowns on the business and tech sectors," Because China is exercising our anti-monopoly laws, cracking down on anti-competitive practices exhibited by Alibaba, Tencent, DiDi, etc, that make it more difficult for smaller firms in China to compete fairly with the bigger Chinese corporations. So actually, what the government did is beneficial for foreign companies, since it "frees up space" for companies to come and set up shop in China. Whereas in the United States for example, the big U.S monopolies like Amazon, Apple, Google, Facebook dominate their respective markets and virtually eliminated competition from smaller American firms.
    12
  2719. Could you explain why those two companies should they merge together? The fact that Tik Tok is separate from Douyin, means that the Chinese government doesn't have control over Tik Tok, so they can host servers overseas (i.e in America and Singapore). If Tik Tok and Douyin merge, then the US government would have the reason to ban the app.
    12
  2720.  china is in decline  Tiananmen Square is one of China's largest parade squares, where the portrait of Chairman Mao is hung, and China marked the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China with a massive parade there. What about it?
    12
  2721. China's response is actually more measured at the moment. It's that China is signing the same security treaty with Solomon Islands that Australia signs with them. But this may change in the future, and who knows, maybe China might set up a base in Solomon Islands in the future.
    12
  2722. CGTN may have already sent invitations to Cyrus to appear on their program.
    12
  2723.  @monspeet5568  The bat soup coronavirus origins myth have long been debunked by experts. Source: Is bat soup a delicacy in China? We debunk a rumour on the origin of the coronavirus observers.france24.com/en/20200203-china-coronavirus-bat-soup-debunk-videos-viral-palau-indonesia Videos of Asian people selling or eating bats have been circulating on social media since news broke of the coronavirus outbreak in China, with claims that bats are a possible origin of the new virus. The FRANCE 24 Observers team investigated six of the most-shared videos. Five were filmed outside China, in Palau and Indonesia. None of the videos had any documented link to the outbreak.
    12
  2724. Yes. There needs to be a global transition to a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, from the current uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (i.e the U.S's).
    12
  2725.  @koblongata  In 1958, the Yellow River flooded that coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. In July 1958, the peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 m3/s (790,000 cu ft/s) with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kg/m3 (57 lb/cu ft), 14× and 24× their mean annual values, respectively. The flood water level was so high that it rose up to the top of the levee in several places. This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. It was reported as the most severe flood since 1933.
    12
  2726.  @koblongata  Which U.S General has been fired over the botched Afghan withdrawal? In fact who in the USA has taken responsibility for the whole Afghan debacle? In fact the only person fired was a U.S Marine Lt. Col. Stuart Scheller who was relieved of duty just for voicing out that more accountability needs to be taken over Afghanistan.
    12
  2727.  @seewahleong8459  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US Previously under the Republic of China 🇹🇼, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today under the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    12
  2728.  @seewahleong8459  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    12
  2729.  @ngawangyoga9258  You're an overseas Tibetan living in Paris with access to electricity, then why can't Chinese provide hydroelectricity to Tibetans living on the harsh mountainous conditions of the Tibetan Plateau? You don't use heater, but you clearly use electricity, don't you switch on the lights at night in Paris? You're communicating with me through phone or computer through the Internet, isn't that using electricity already? Then who are you to tell me Tibetans living on the harsh Tibetan Plateau don't want electricity, you tell me? You're living in modernity in Paris, yet you don't want Chinese introducing modernity to Tibetans living in Tibetan Plateau, can't you see your own biased double standards here? Here's Canadian tourist visit to Lhasa and he took the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) and explains how each carriage comes equipped with its own emergency oxygen tank. Video: Welcome to Lhasa - Exploring the City (By Vafa Anderson) youtu.be/J-TfN56ETVM He remarks how much Lhasa has changed in 10 years since he last visited. Throughout the video you can see many religious people worshipping, praying, spinning those "prayer wheels" and performing full-body kowtows on the ground, so how exactly is Tibetan religion impacted?
    12
  2730. Good video. Now that the Palestine-Israel conflict is making headlines everywhere, I'm wondering if you're going to do a video on it as well.
    12
  2731.  @mgrabi71  Putin is the elected president of the Russian Federation how is he not the legitimate president of Russia?
    12
  2732.  @mgrabi71  After the resignation of Yeltsin, Putin became acting president, and less than four months later was elected outright to his first term as president. He was reelected in 2004. As he was then constitutionally limited to two consecutive terms as president, Putin served as prime minister again from 2008 to 2012 under Dmitry Medvedev, and returned to the presidency in 2012. He was reelected again in 2018.
    12
  2733. Agreed. Ethnic Russians living in America are already face discrimination: Russian athletes are banned from Olympics and Russian sportsmen forced to denounce their motherland or else. Russian musicians, composers, dancers, artists are being ostracized if they refuse to denounce their motherland. The same thing is going to happen to Chinese and other Asians living in the West (if it isn't happening already).
    12
  2734.  @cchannel7857  Cyrus said in his email that he's been very busy lately and that's why he had a late response to CGTN's initial proposal. So it's possible that he was too busy at that time to work out payment details and that's why the payment discussion was delayed. It's not uncommon for payment details to be worked out later after the business transaction occurred, so what are you trying to say?
    12
  2735. Indeed. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, the U.S is a threat to global peace and stability.
    12
  2736. WION = We Indians Only Negative (about China)
    12
  2737.  @performancefluid3666  About having no term limits, just look at German 🇩🇪 Chancellor Angela Merkel and she has been in power for far longer than most other Western leaders, who've long reached the end of their term limits and had to step down. The German Chancellor's term limit is renewable, but under Merkel's leadership, German's economy is strong and many Germans are happy to continue having her as Chancellor. The longer she stays in office, the more wisdom and political experience she gains as a German politician in governing Germany. In fact, Germany has a long history Chancellors with long term limits such as Prince Otto von Bismarck (22 years), Helmut Kohl (16 years) Angela Merkel (15 years), and so on. This is a list of chancellors of Germany by time in office from 1867 to 2021. Source: List of chancellors of Germany by time in office wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_chancellors_of_Germany_by_time_in_office
    12
  2738.  @performancefluid3666  Having a Chinese wife and family , doesn't automatically mean that you are not anti-China. I know of at least 2 clowns who live in America and have Chinese wives, yet they constantly post anti-China content on their YouTube channels. It's like the example of the racist who says: "I'm not racist, some of my best friends are African American." so what makes you think having a Chinese wife automatically grants you immunity to being anti-Chinese?
    12
  2739. I think what Jenkins meant was "Taiwan is a county of China" There I've corrected it for him.
    12
  2740.  @SuperMikado282  Recently, the US Credit Rating has been downgraded too.
    12
  2741.  @aleksklochko  Yes, I really do. NATO has expended all their sanctions on Russia and poured their weapons into Ukraine, exhausting their sanction options and running out of weapons to send. Meanwhile, Russia is making slow but steady, concrete progress towards the finish line, while still having plenty of weapons (and sanctions options too, if they choose) to deploy.
    12
  2742.  @calinyx  "The 'right' thing would be to subject every athlete to a test that is not run by their own country." So you're saying that Westerner athletes should be tested by the China Anti-Doping Agency (CADA)? Then why don't you get Western countries to agree to have their athletes tested by CADA first, if you want China to do the same with our athletes?
    12
  2743. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou in China many people like to eat dog meat." People in France eat horse meat and snails (escargot). People in Britain eat rabbit stew and people in Australia eat kangaroo meat and crocodile meat, so what's your point then?
    12
  2744. What "Fact Check" is this? Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    12
  2745.  @DarkNaomi  What deaths from the Hong Kong Police? Before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was British colony and the 1956 HK riots resulted in 59 deaths while the 1967 HK riots resulted 51 deaths. Yet after the handover back to mainland China, today's 2019 HK riots resulted in zero deaths thus far so aren't the Hong Kong Police showing incredible restraint here? Despite being under severe stress every day, enduring physical and mental fatigue after months of protests and facing public humiliation by the masses? Which Hong Kong protestor death occur because of Hong Kong police you tell me? None!
    12
  2746.  @daywalker0988  The Republic of China (Taiwan) also claims the entire South China Sea, so what's your point? China first claimed SCS islands back in 1947, when ROC published the 11-Dash Line (which the People's Republic of China's 9-Dash line is based upon). Back then, nobody opposed China's claims, not Vietnam, not Phlippines, not even the USA. The Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had even formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese, in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958, and here is the note: Source: 1958 Diplomatic note from Pham van Dong to Zhou Enlai wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But once it was discovered the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind and broke its word, by incorporating those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can suddenly change their mind just like this?
    12
  2747. Although Taiwan is at the cutting edge of making chips unbelievably small, if we look at it long term, we are approaching the theoretical limit of just how small we can make chips. Some experts believe that while silicon-based chips are reaching their physical limits, carbon-based chips (made of graphene) will form the next foundation material for semiconductors. Carbon-based chips offer several advantages over silicon-chips, such as better conductivity, faster transmission, better heat dissipation, lower power consumption, 3D stacking, and so on. Because of this, mainland China is investing in carbon-based chips and recently made several breakthroughs in the manufacture of such chips, because once the limits of silicon chips are reached, Taiwan would no longer hold power as the leading chip manufacturer, if the mainland is able to make carbon-based chips work.
    12
  2748.  @milinlim5211  Here's the full interview (UN Advisor Slams BBC for Ignoring Western Human Rights Abuses - 15 April 2021 youtu.be/KLm7er5VoDU )
    12
  2749.  @koblongata  "Maybe try and bring something equally good to the world, to humanity, OK?" By the way you should be thankful that China is the factory of the world so that people in other countries can have access to affordable goods. Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, clothing, sneakers, etc affordable so that people in other countries save money on living expenses. Think about the billions of dollars Americans (or other developed countries) have saved on daily expenses over the years, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spend elsewhere on other pursuits like cars, housing, luxury brands, etc. Isn't that why many Americans flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money? Even if you're not American, other countries have reaped the benefits of affordable Made-in-China goods that helps keep the cost of living lower than it should be.
    12
  2750.  @michaelkatz275  Russia wants to supply gas to Europe, but the company Gazprom's turbine was sent to Canada for repairs and wasn't returned back to Russia. Furthermore, it was U.S and Germany that choose to shut down Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline supplying Russian gas to Germany. If only Germany would open Nord Stream 2.
    12
  2751. Also, the silence in the western media about the BRICS summit in Kazan is deafening.
    12
  2752.  oneviwatara  The word "China" is a foreign name given to our country and supposedly derived from the Qin Dynasty, hence the name Chi-na. But Chinese however refer to our homeland as 中国 zhōngguó which means "Middle Kingdom".
    12
  2753.  @MarkYeung1  The Philippines became an American colony after losing the American-Phillippines War. As for Vietnam, China helped the Vietnamese fight for independence from France. During the Vietnam War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food, money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons, ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla force with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help Vietnam fight for independence.
    12
  2754. Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. Here is compiled list of what Western journalists have to say about China's economy 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. But its already 2018 and China's economy is still going strong, so its blatantly obvious that Western propagandists are lying about China's economic downfall for almost 30 years. At some point, you stop believing what Westerners say about China being on the brink of collapse.
    12
  2755.  @SwedeenXBL  You said: "the missile itself was a 9M38 fired from a BUK TELAR missile system in a field near the town of Pervomaiskiy. But I guess Ukraine went on a super secret mission into separtist controlled ground transporting a Russian BUK TELAR missile system completely unnoticed." The Ukraine Armed Forces themselves use Russian-made weapons, such as the BUK in their military. So how is the missile being of Russian origin indicate that Russia is the culprit? You said: "Investigations on the incident was made by Australia, Belgium, Malaysia, Ukraine and your own country, the Netherlands." The thing is, why wasn't Russia invited to participate in the investigations as well?
    12
  2756.  Charles Schmid  China's supercomputer Tianhe-1 (天河-1) found that the lungs of a young American vaper hospitalized for "mysterious pneumonia" last summer could be exhibiting Covid-19 symptoms. scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3079046/chinese-supercomputer-and-american-doctors-clash-over-ai
    12
  2757. Guess she probably learned her "diplomacy" from American "diplomats" like Jake Sullivan and Anthony Blinken in their condescending attitudes towards China.
    12
  2758. Not only is Taiwan part of China and clearly not independent, even polls reveal that a majority of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo. The status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China, and any move to amend Taiwan's constitution and declare independence would be seen as "changing the status quo", a scenario in which majority of the people of Taiwan polled do not want.
    12
  2759.  @michaelkatz275  About the real estate in China, today China is a country of homeowners with more than 90% of households owning homes (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations (Huang et al., 2020). This achievement is particularly impressive and is in sharp contrast to the recent decline of homeownership rate in the U.S., Western Europe and other developed countries.
    12
  2760. Here's a Chinese analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family, which in turn open up a path to her ex-husband's doorstep. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    12
  2761.  @GabrielEddy  "Definitely nothing whatsoever happened at Tienanmen Square in 1989." According to Wikileaks, cables from the United States embassy in Beijing have shown that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square in 1989. A visiting Chilean diplomat (Carlos Gallo and his wife) provided eyewitness accounts to the events unfolding in Tiananmen Square. He said that most of the troops which entered the square were actually armed only with anti-riot gear – truncheons and wooden clubs and that there was "no mass firing into the crowd of students at the monument".
    12
  2762.  @GabrielEddy  "So, what you are saying is, China is one protest away from revolution." I never said there, where did you get the idea that China is about to collapse any time now? Is the thought of China succeeding so revolting to you?
    12
  2763. I believe in the original Records of the Three Kingdoms (the real historical record) none of the people were portrayed as truly "good" or "bad", including Liu Bei (the protagonist). But Cao Cao has such an impact on Chinese culture. The Chinese equivalent of the English phrase "Speak of the devil" (used to indicate the arrival of someone, after talking about him in converstaion) is 说曹操，曹操就到。or "Speak of Cao Cao and he will arrive"
    12
  2764.  @michel3691  Taiwan can keep their freedoms and democracy, but not their independence. If those separatist want to declare independence, then they should find some other plot of land to call their own, because Taiwan island inalienable part of China.
    12
  2765.  @whatnani7372  Wars are a costly affair indeed, especially the West's wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Yemen, etc.
    12
  2766. +Red Guard "Don't blame the soldiers, blame the leaders" During Rape of Nanjing, Chinese men were butchered for sport and Japanese soldiers had a competition to see who could rack up the most kills. Chinese women were gang-raped, their naked bodies left exposed and mutilated, their genitals bayoneted or shoved with sharp sticks of bamboo. The young and elderly weren't spared, and babies were cut open so that Japanese soldiers can rape those infants. Pregnant women were raped and had their swollen bellies cut open and the unborn fetus ripped from their wombs and stabbed. Which part of those atrocities were the Japanese leaders doing, not the soldiers? How is Japanese soldiers raping Chinese women considered grounds for enshrinement and worship at the Yasukuni shrine?
    12
  2767.  @Tespri  "That's what Ruzzia said before invading Okraine." "Ruzzia has openly stated that they wish to re-establish their old borders and build their evil empire again." Could you quote me a text where Russia has openly stated that they wish to rebuild the Soviet Union again? Also, since you state Russia said this before the special military operation, could you cite me a text where Russia said that before 24th Feb?
    12
  2768. Many mainland Chinese have been taught since young to regard the people of Taiwan (also Hong Kong and Macau) as part of the same extended family. It's a pity that these feelings aren't always reciprocated by the people of Taiwan towards mainlanders. Because mainland China is arguably the only one in the world who truly cares about Taiwan. We know the U.S certainly doesn't.
    12
  2769.  @MarkYeung1  Ethnic Russian civilians living in Donetsk and Luhansk had been shelled by Ukrainian ultra-nationalist neo-Nazis since 2014. According to UN figures, from 2018 to 2021, 81.4% of civilian casualties in the Donbas war came in rebel-held territory. Russia finally decided to put an end to an ongoing war at its border.
    12
  2770. Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon, dominate their respective industries and eliminated competition from smaller American firms. China actually has an anti-monopoly law to clamp down on anti-competitive practices in the industry, even Jack Ma is being investigated under China's anti-monopoly laws.
    12
  2771. I recently watched Cyrus Jannsen's coverage of Shanghai lockdown and was rather disappointed that he bought into that "Xi Jinping needs to secure his 3rd term" narrative.
    12
  2772. China seeks win-win cooperation, while the U.S only sees a zero sum game.
    12
  2773. When a lie gets repeated long enough, even the lie itself believes it Israel. Get it? Believes it IS REAL?
    12
  2774. Russia had military intervention in Crimea and annexed it from Ukraine, and all the USA did was impose sanctions on Russia that's all. What makes Philippines think that USA will go to war with China for Philippines sake? What value is Philippines to the USA?
    12
  2775.  User 01  "神州 Shenzhou Bro this “mansana” guy is indian ," Many Indians (but not all) are still suffering from a subservient "colonial mindset" after being colonized by Britain for so long. Even after the physical decolonization of India, the "decolonization of the mind" still needs to happen in order for Indians to heal the mental scars inflicted as a result of colonization.
    12
  2776. Indeed. Learning to read Chinese might become one of the requirements for foreign astronauts wanting to enter Tiangong (天宮) space station.
    12
  2777. Britain was a colonial superpower in 1800s, but was eventually overtaken by USA in 1900s, but before that, China had been a superpower for 1800 years and only in the last 200 years was China not a superpower, at least according to Angus Maddison's research, who published the GDP of countries from 1 to 2000 AD.
    12
  2778.  @namelesssnitchy  If you want to talk about prison populations then it's actually America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate
    12
  2779.  @TA-pl8vi  But if you're the US Ambassador to China specifically, wouldn't it hurt to be able to at least speak Mandarin? There are plenty of Americans who can speak Mandarin, why not assign one to be ambassador?
    12
  2780. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West. Since the 19th century, many have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the U.S, is simply too frightening for many Westerners (but not all) to fathom.
    12
  2781. It's the literal definition of the opposite of a meritocracy. People get promoted if they display incompetence. Just look at Victoria Nuland's promotion.
    12
  2782.  @chadgaming8071  About Afghanistan, the Americans occupied Afghanistan for 20 years, even after Osama bin Laden has been killed (and the location was in neighboring Pakistan). The Americans imposed Western-style democracy onto Afghanistan, but their democratic experiment ended in failure as after the U.S's shambolic withdrawal from the Kabul, the democratically elected Afghan President Ghani fled the country with carloads of U.S cash, while the 300,000-strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban in weeks with minimal resistance.
    12
  2783.  @abbotsful  China has many historical monuments like The Great Wall of China, Forbidden City, Qin Emperor Tomb, Terracotta Army, The Grand Canal (world's oldest and longest artificial river) and many more historical sites. Here's some videos of Chinese historical monuments. Video: The Great Wall of China in 4k - DJI Phantom 4 youtu.be/EotbKqZmBuY?t=20 Video: Forbidden City, Beijing, China in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/R9vcSWb6mug Video: Terracotta Army, Xian, China in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/VhIouznYlvo Yet there are many anti-China people who claim that Chinese Culture is destroyed.
    12
  2784.  @Curry.59  Tibetan population in China has nearly quadrupled from 2 million in 1953 to 7 million in 2020, who said the Tibetans are dying? And just look up tourists visiting Lhasa, what makes you think they are suffering?
    12
  2785. Daniel Dumbrill also uploaded a similar video comparing the Uighurs in Xinjiang and Israel-Palestine conflict according to western lens.
    12
  2786.  Beast Mode  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    12
  2787.  @emichaelny336  Have you talked to the Tibetans living in Tibet? Their lives have improved greatly under the Chinese government rule. Life on the Tibetan Plateau is harsh as the mountainous soil is infertile and combined with scarce rainfall in the Himalayas, makes it very difficult for Tibetans to grow enough food to feed themselves. Starvation was commonplace in Tibet previously and it was difficult to import food into Tibet given its isolated location in the Himalayas. But fast forward till today, and Tibetans now have roads, streetlamps, running water, gas pipelines, electricity, telephone cables, Internet access, smartphones, computers, cars, etc. Chinese government built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) to connect the isolated Tibet to the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed themselves. Hydroelectric power stations were constructed in Tibet to supply the region with clean renewable energy.
    12
  2788.  @emichaelny336  You said: "Why do those in HK prefer their lives under British rule?" Because the colonizer not only colonized territory, but they also colonize the minds of the local people. "Mental Colonization" continues to persist in the minds of many (but not all) Hong Kongers. Even after the British left Hong Kong, the minds of some people remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. Just as there is decolonization of territory, there also needs to be a "Decolonization of the Mind" in order for the people to truly be free.
    12
  2789.  @wileyfox3436  Singapore has been governed by authoritarian single-party PAP for 56 years (their entire life as a nation) just like China has been governed by authoritarian single-party CPC for 71 years. Yet under the authoritarian PAP rule, Singapore transformed from sleepy fishing village nation into a world class country, just like how China has transformed under the CPC.
    12
  2790. Cyrus Janssen is an U.S citizen, NOT a Chinese citizen, so can't he give this lecture to his home country of the USA? Why should he criticize China when it's not his home country?
    12
  2791.  @namelesssnitchy  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Which country do you think is the real threat to global peace and stability here?
    12
  2792.  @abyyy490  US's arming of Taiwan isn't free. It comes at a significant cost to Taiwanese taxpayers, and the US only sends older military equipment to the island, not the latest and most advanced military equipment. Hopefully, the people of Taiwan realize this and that it's not a deal worth continuing.
    12
  2793.  @rksleung  You said: "The republic of china was established in 1911. The national army has been an ally with the US army in defending the country from the japanese." The United States did not care about defending the country from the Japanese. When Imperial Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931, the U.S was content to let the Japanese occupy more and more Chinese territory. The U.S only joined China in 1942 against the Japanese because Pearl Harbor was bombed, not for China's sake. Also, when Japan invaded China, the KMT leader Chiang kai-Shek was reluctant to meet the invaders head on, instead he continued purging communists (our fellow Chinese brethren) instead of repelling the Japanese invaders. Until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap Chiang. This was later known as the Xi'An Incident (西安事变) Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was thanks to communist goodwill, by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release. Only then did Chiang agree to form a united front with the communists to expel the Japanese invaders from China.
    12
  2794. Glad that you decided to do a video on China's relations with Solomon Islands. Perhaps your next video topic could be about the Sri Lankan crisis.
    12
  2795. It's a combination of the Red Scare and the Yellow Peril mindset that's fuelling Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiment in the West today towards Russia and China. And it's having the effect of pushing both countries closer together until there is no daylight between them.
    12
  2796. Only way for India to become a superpower is for USA, China, Russia to regress backwards. Otherwise, India will at the most play the role of a regional power.
    12
  2797. China is a force for peace in the world.
    12
  2798.  @MarkYeung1  The 2019 Hong Kong riots already made doing business in Hong Kong difficult. Stores in Hong Kong were forced to close, public transportation was disrupted and especially the Hong Kong tourist industry took a hit (especially from mainland Chinese tourists). Thank goodness the National Security Law brought an end to the riots and peace finally returned to Hong Kong after a year of rioting.
    12
  2799.  @MrMichealHouse  They interviewed two people from Kashgar, shown their faces on screen and their voices were not masked by distortion. Even that little Kindergartener girl did not have her voice distorted so why is it only that mysterious "Uighur" on board the train had his/her voice distorted? To manufacture lies in order to paint China in negative light?
    12
  2800. ​ @laser-tv2jq  Research by Deborah Brautigam and Meg Rithmire shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country, so what debt trap are you talking about?
    12
  2801.  @michaelkatz275  Where did you get this figure of "one million Uyghurs in concentration camps in Xin Jiang?" According to investigation by The Greyzone, the 1 million figure came from two dubious sources, one of which only interviewed 8 Uighurs on what they think the number of detainees was, and they extrapolated the figure to arrive at 1 million. But otherwise, there is no concrete evidence to support this claim of 1 million Uighurs in detention.
    12
  2802.  @hamiorg  "神州 Shenzhou this is true but any foreigners can never become Chinese no matter what." China's immigration policy is different from countries like the United States. China already hosts the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people, so China doesn't really need the extra immigrants. Maybe this policy might change in the future, but China's priority has always been unity among the people, and accepting immigrants might introduce some disunity in the form of social problems. Whereas the immigration policy in the United States is so loose. As long as an immigrant has a family member or relative who's an American citizen, they are themselves eligible to apply for American citizenship. That's why many immigrants marry Americans for citizenship, so they they can import their families over, and this introduces social problems of their own, as many Americans often voice their complaints towards such immigrants. Different country, different immigration policy
    12
  2803. Here is a video by a Westerner describing his experiences in Lhasa, Tibet. Video:Welcome to Lhasa Tibet - Exploring the city (by Vafa Anderson) youtube.com/watch?v=J-TfN56ETVM And in the video he said he was in Tibet before, in 2007, and he describes how much it has changed since then. He takes the Qinghai-Tibet railway (world's highest altitude railway) passing through difficult mountain terrain and low oxygen conditions (each carriage in the train is equipped with emergency oxygen tanks) in order to reach Lhasa. So where is your basis for your claim that "Westerners aren't allowed in Tibet" ? Why don't you yourself come down to Tibet and see for yourself whether life in Tibet has improved or not?
    12
  2804.  @klc9135  Many of the world's conflicts today can be traced back to Britain indeed. Take Israel and Gaza for example.
    12
  2805.  @georgeshibley9529  Our country, our laws. Look at the West and they are literally bowing over backwards to accommodate Muslims. Muslim refugees are fleeing their conflicted Islamic countries and flooding Western countries like USA and Europe and are under little pressure to assimilate into predominantly Christian Western society, much to the chagrin of local Americans and Europeans. For example, Muslim men may marry multiple wives, and Muslim women continue to wear Muslim headveils out in public, and secretly, many Americans and Europeans are angry at this, but they are fearful of voicing their honest opinions, for fear of being labelled as racist or Islamophobes (fear of Islam) by those politically correct SJWs. In the end, many Muslims see Westerners silence as acceptance of their ways.
    12
  2806. China has many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to chart the course of the country for the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. Whereas U.S lacks a long term plan to deal with the rise of China.
    12
  2807.  @Tespri  Have you looked up videos concerning safety in China? All of them describe China as being very safe even at night. And many expats have also visited the rural areas of China away from the touristy places and have also described them as safe.
    12
  2808. Agreed. Instead of burning down bridges and jeopardizing relations, it's better to leave the doors open in hopes that relations between our countries improve later.
    12
  2809. Yet many anti-China people still falsely believe that Huawei is state-owned.
    12
  2810. +James Russel "China, on the otherhand, is forced to rely on other allies, specifically ones that the IMF wouldn't lend money to on account of human rights violations, something China has no qualms about." Why can't China lend money to countries irregardless of their human rights violations? Such countries tend to be poor, war-torn, starving and plagued by unstable governments and civil unrest. How do you expect these countries to maintain a Western standard of human rights? Who do the Westerners think they are to judge other countries by their standards? China does not judge countries on their "human rights violations" and the government is willing to do business and build infrastructure in those countries, so that locals can find jobs and employment, to buy food to feed their families, all towards developing a stable country and China is helping build infrastructure in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Maldives, and some African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Angola, etc. Otherwise, how else do you expect these countries to ever develop? When your Western banks won't lend them the necessary capital for development?
    12
  2811.  @MarkYeung1  Landing on the far side of the Moon is much more complicated, because lunar landers aren't able to receive signals directly from the other side of the Moon. China solved this problem through deploying a relay satellite (named "Magpie Bridge" 鹊桥) that allowed China's Chang'e 4 (嫦娥-4) lunar lander to communicate with Earth despite being on the far side of the Moon. Even NASA with all its resources hasn't achieved a lunar landing on the far side, unlike China.
    12
  2812. China remains a neutral party to the conflict. China continues doing business with both Western Europe as well as Russia. The question is why is Europe forcing China to pick a side?
    12
  2813. Russians are clever and hardy people as well. Vladimir Putin is a great leader and an excellent statesman against the likes of Joe Biden, Boris Johnson, Olaf Scholz, Macron and even Zelenskyy. Even Sergey Lavrov's defense of Russia's stance is rational and logical in explaining NATO's encroachment onto Russia's borders.
    12
  2814. Taiwan is an in alianable part of China
    12
  2815. South Korea's economic prosperity (i.e The Miracle on the Han River) actually occurred under the authoritarian dictator Park Chung Hee. Previously, South Korea was an impoverished country and when Park first came to power in 1961, South Korea per capita income was only US$72.0. In fact, North Korea was the greater economic and military power on the peninsula at that time due to the North's history of heavy industries. One of Park's main goals was to end the poverty of South Korea, and lift the country up from being an underdeveloped economy to a developed economy using the Soviet Union and its Five Year Plans as a model. Park succeeded and South Korea's economy became prosperous under his rule, but Park was also a dictator, repressing political opposition and dissent, and modifying Korea's constitution to become highly authoritarian. So the history shows that South Korea's economic success came about under authoritarian rule, not under western-style democracy.
    12
  2816.  @cchannel7857  Cyrus has stated in his email that he's been very busy lately. It's not uncommon among business practices for payment details to be worked out at a later date after the initial business proposal, so what exactly are you trying to say? The end goal is that Cyrus declined payment in the end.
    12
  2817.  @relaxwhc  Why can't I be on this post? Don't we clearly share the same idea that U.S should deal with it's own Covid mess instead of bashing and stopping China?
    12
  2818.  @zetristan4525  Cyrus is a US citizen, so he feels that through criticism, he can play a role in the upcoming Nov elections. He isn't a Chinese citizen, so for what reason would he do the same thing to China?
    12
  2819.  @MarkYeung1  At least there were 3 other candidates apart from Putin to vote for on the ballot paper. Meanwhile, Zelenskyy has banned all opposition media and it looks as though Ukraine won't be conducting any elections, even though Zelenskyy's term as President is due to expire by 20th May.
    12
  2820. Like taking a knife to a gunfight, Canada is sending infantry and snipers to fight against Russia's mechanized army of tanks and artillery.
    12
  2821.  @qm3384  If China does a much better job at demonising US, then why can't is it majority of the people in Western countries hold a negative opinion of China, while a positive opinion of USA? If China's propaganda was really that good, then why is China in such a situation today?
    12
  2822.  @comradetirer  Those satellite images were taken from while Bucha is in Russian control, so why would Russian forces shell the territory they control? Most likely it's the Ukrainian forces that's been shelling the city, and that's why those mortar impacts showed up on satellite images.
    12
  2823. U.S Punch is no match for China's Bear/Panda Hug.
    12
  2824. More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy taken off Weibo helps puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    12
  2825. Singapore is abandoning its "neutrality" when they slap sanctions on Russia. Now Singapore is added to Russia's list of unfriendly countries. Was the sanctions by Singapore worth it? What did those sanctions achieve for Singapore except to "poke the bear" like other Western countries?
    12
  2826. H&M, Nike, Adidas, Uniqlo want to malign China, yet want to earn money from Chinese consumers. 海外品牌想赚着中国的钱，还想继续说中国不好。
    12
  2827. From what I understand, "Asians Studies" is a field concerned with studying the "Asian people," Asian cultures, languages, history and politics, but it has literally nothing to do with a country's economics, demographics, housing, infrastructure development, etc, which could explain why Zeihan is consistently wrong in his predictions about China.
    12
  2828.  @Carbuncle0168  The Americans had promised the Philippines their independence from the Spanish if they supported the U.S. But after the American-Spanish war, the Americans took the Philippines for their own, and the Filipinos fought back, but suffered over 200,000 casualties and lost, thus the Philippines became an American colony.
    12
  2829. NGOs should fix their own domestic problems back home, rather than concern themselves about the domestic issues of other countries. The sheer hubris of them to think that they can go around solving other countries problems, when they can't even solve their own problems at home.
    12
  2830. Agreed. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West. Since the 19th century, many have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    12
  2831. China is USA's biggest trade partner, so why would they join India in a war against China? President Trump already mentioned many times in his public addresses that "China's cooperation is essential for dealing with North Korea" so its unlikely that they want to jeopardize US-China relations for India's sake.
    12
  2832. So Philippines wants to become the next Ukraine?
    12
  2833.  @Anonymous------  In fact, one study has shown that there are more Chinese restaurants in the United States, than there are American fast food like McDonald’s, KFC, Wendy's.
    12
  2834.  @mjlmn86  Even Wikileaks has shown that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989. Source: Wikileaks: no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square, cables claim telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8555142/Wikileaks-no-bloodshed-inside-Tiananmen-Square-cables-claim.html Secret cables from the United States embassy in Beijing have shown there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square when China put down student pro-democracy demonstrations 22 years ago.
    12
  2835.  @tl4172  Monoculture? Chinese Renminbi banknote have languages of Uighurs, Tibetan, Mongolian and ethnic minority languages written on them. If you watch CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV, they constantly showcase ethnic minority cultures, festivals and traditional clothing, you don't see that level of celebration of ethnic minorities in China, as in the USA for example.
    12
  2836. Chad Leach You are talking about political stagnation in China, but the communist party has undergone great change since PRC's founding in 1949. The party is pragmatic, such that when they discovered Marxism did not help Chinese economy at all, they abandoned it and switched to capitalism instead. For example, the government's One-Child Policy was effective at limiting China's population growth, but once it was discovered that China has shrinking birth rates, it was changed recently to a Two-Child policy instead. When pollution levels were reaching intolerable levels, it was decided to ban further further incorporation of non-electric vehicles. It is this flexible approach that allows CPC to learn and adapt to changing environments. USA despite being "democratic" also suffers from political stagnation. Trump was voted in because he promised to "drain the swamp" because of political stagnation. Previous US presidents followed more or less the same path, starting wars in Middle East and making sure the 1% keeps the wealth away from the 99%. If Hilary Clinton had been elected, it is no doubt that she too, would have followed this same path again, which was part of the reason why Americans choose voted for Trump instead.
    12
  2837. Many Chinese hold optimistic attitudes and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    12
  2838.  @sreeniv09  You said: "However I will say that China in last 50 years have not colonized any other country like Britain or France" Exactly, it's Britain that colonized India, and many Indians (not all) tend to have the "colonial mentality". Even though the British have left India and decolonized from it, the "decolonization of the mind" needs to happen in order to reverse the mental conditioning inflicted by colonizer on the minds of the colonized. Only then can Indians truly be free, otherwise their actions will continue to serve their colonial master's interests.
    12
  2839.  @kankit230  Why are you calling it by it's improper name, Chinese virus, instead of its proper name, Covid-19? Look at the numerous racially-motivated attacks against Asian Americans (and Asian Canadians, Asian Australians, Asian Europeans, etc) because American politicians like Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo choose to refer to the virus by it's improper name. Video: Asian Americans face discrimination in wake of the coronavirus youtu.be/t_IyTxRNUYk
    12
  2840.  @Something-tz2vw  "Yes, it's been my experience that no one in the Philippines really takes Chinese claims over these islands too seriously." I take it that you're not Filipino then? Yet you blindly believe what Philippine says? The Philippines claim over the Spratly Islands stems from the 17th century Spanish colonial government publishing the Velarde map. But this map is drawn by colonial masters without regard for existing historical boundaries.
    12
  2841.  @nmpolo  It's up to the people of Hawaii to settle their sovereignty issues and to declare independence if they can. But until that happens, Hawaii is internationally recognized as part of the United States for now. And if USA can have territory out there in the Pacific Ocean, far away from the American mainland, then distance is not a factor when it comes to issues of territorial sovereignty.
    12
  2842.  @Something-tz2vw  You said: "It wouldn't be clever of China to push Philippines in a closer alliance with America over fears of these islands." It won't be clever of the Philippines to ally with the United States in the first place. By doing so, they are digging their own grave and might even end up as the next Ukraine. The previous Philippine president Dueterte was stanchly against the US, and maintained reasonably stable relationship with China. But with President Marcos Jr. all the previous work repairing the relationship has gone down the drain. You said: "Maybe China should first take control of Taiwan before it tries to take control of these islands?" Reunification across the Taiwan strait will occur at a time of the mainland's choosing. Any hastily taken action could potentially result in conflict, setting back the peace and progress in Asia region by decades. And that's exactly what the United States desires.
    12
  2843. Yes. It's been shown that video games can be addictive. Many countries have laws restricting children under 18-21 years of age from engaging in addictive activities like smoking, drinking alcohol, gambling, so China is adding video games to the list that's all. Adults over 18 years of age are unaffected by the gaming hours restriction.
    12
  2844.  @msimon6808  I disagree. Profits from the sale of opium come not from whether the drug is made illegal by the state, but from the very nature of addictive substances. There is always a demand for such narcotic substances, which is why they are profitable regardless of whether they are legal or not.
    12
  2845. If the US and Russia can become friends it will be a historical moment. But why the animosity towards China? Why make peace with a historical rival only to declare war on a trading partner?
    11
  2846. ***** That was during civil war where Chinese killed Chinese. Like America civil war, Americans killed Americans. CCP has lifted millions of people up from poverty after modernization.
    11
  2847. Yes. Lu Kang shoulders the burden of US-China relations which is why he is careful about his words in case the media twist what he says. I'm not American but I hope Trump can learn that what he says in Twitter can be interpreted differently by media to escalate conflicts between our countries.
    11
  2848. If Taiwan declares independence, China will use it as an excuse to "quell" a rebellious state and under the One-China policy, this will constitute a civil war. If US joins in, they'll be breaking the policy and it will be seen as an invasion by China. If they don't interfere, they can always resume trade relations with the victor. Which choice will the US make?
    11
  2849.  @maccheese8379  Indeed. It's tragic what US and UK did to Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Palestine, Egypt, Ukraine through various wars. Whereas China is currently at peace and not at war with any country since our last conflict in 1979. In fact, the People's Liberation Army hasn't had any actual combat experience for 40 years, yet China is somehow perceived as a threat in the west.
    11
  2850.  @ashpatel2505  You said: "China was on its way to achieving its place, but the country’s leadership tried to force the issue by challenging the world order," Where exactly is China's place? Behind that of the West? The current world older is one that reinforces the colonial mindset, where Western countries are above and other countries are always behind them. Can't China attempt to forge a new world order, one that is more fair to the developing countries? "so now it’s slowly being isolated by decoupling and de-risking by its most significant trading partners across the world." Isolated? Then why are Western diplomats visiting Beijing like Anthony Blinken, Manuel Macron, Janet Yellen, even Henry Kissinger? That doesn't sound at all like China is being isolated on the world stage.
    11
  2851.  @michaelkatz275  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    11
  2852. Russia is playing Chess. The U.S is playing Checkers. China is playing Go (Weiqi 圍棋).
    11
  2853.  @leekh2125  The Presidential pardon is like a "Get-out-of-jail-free card" that potential criminals can use to defend themselves even before they commit their crimes.
    11
  2854.  @dagsmoko3889  You said: "Perhaps the ccp was in on it!" Why would the Communist Party of China be involved in Meng Wanzhou's case? What's the point of CPC getting Canada to arrest Huawei CFO? Isn't that shooting themselves in the foot?
    11
  2855. ​ @JosephatPalanga  Iran's is by Israel, and China's was by the United States.
    11
  2856.  @MarkYeung1  The U.S had encouraged China to punish Vietnam for their invasion of Cambodia.
    11
  2857.  @deschan2246  China and India are currently not at war. Where is the formal declaration of war between India and China?
    11
  2858.  @camt8804  "We will not forget how Australian s are treated anywhere in world no matter what their skin colour." Why did Australian media ignore Julian Assange detention for years in Belmarsh Prison? Instead their media encourages their audience to focus on Yang Hengjun?
    11
  2859. Amnesty says Xinjiang is a "hellscape"? They should take a good look at this short 3-min video of Ürümqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and is this really a hellscape? youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA
    11
  2860. Fred Teng (滕绍骏) the gentleman on the top-right of the panel made some very blunt points regarding Hong Kong, I love it.
    11
  2861.  @danielong1153  China is vast country and has to support world's largest population, so we are ever hungry for resources. And even with such huge rail length, China only had one incident thus far, so how is that reason to doubt our safety standards? Besides massive bridges and hi-speed rail infrastructure, China also built Three Gorges Dam (world's largest hydroelectric power station) in order to control annual flooding of Yangtze River. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtube.com/watch?v=b8cCsUBYSkw The Three Gorges Dam also help supply China with clean renewable energy to fuel our growth and to reduce our over reliance on fossil fuels (which burn dirtily and contribute to pollution in China) Thanks to Three Gorges Dam, China has become the world leader in hydroelectric energy production, surpassing even Brazil, Canada, the USA and of course, Japan too. Source: China produces the most electricity from hydroelectric power more than double the amount produced by Brazil. weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/
    11
  2862. Or the US might establish an Ukraine Government in Exile. It's part of their playbook.
    11
  2863. It's apparently even worst, it's a "ransomless" kidnap because U.S.A and Canada never even named a price (be it a hefty fine or some other compensation) to release Meng Wanzhou.
    11
  2864.  @peterretep1010  I think you mean is that China wasn't modernizing until 1912, when the Republic of China was established by Dr. Sun Yat-sen.
    11
  2865. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. On the other hand, many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a bleak outlook of the future.
    11
  2866.  @TacticalMayo  Challenge? It's the United States that's sending aircraft carriers and warships from halfway across the globe to the South China Sea, and even to the Taiwan Straits.
    11
  2867.  @manimtimjahmilb.8079  But Chinese coastguard don't shoot to death Philippines fishermen, unlike what Philippines coastguard did to Chinese fishermen. Why take someone else's life?
    11
  2868. The White Australia policy is a term encapsulating a set of historical policies that aimed to forbid people of non-European ethnic origin, especially Asians (primarily Chinese) and Pacific Islanders, from immigrating to Australia, starting in 1901. ... (Source: Wikipedia: White Australia policy) Even though subsequent governments have progressively dismantled such policies between 1949 and 1973, the mindset is much harder to change.
    11
  2869. I wonder if EU would suddenly realizes it dropped the ball, and tries to make up for it by fast-tracking Turkiye's entry into EU. Then again, nah, they probably don't care.
    11
  2870.  @plethos  You're making the ad hominem fallacy, where instead of addressing his argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person himself.
    11
  2871. Indeed. Brian helps explain the military specifications of missiles, what vehicles carry them, that those vehicles have multiple purposes such as transporting supplies, antenna, anti-air, etc, whereas most civilian Western MSM just skim over the technical details and present the narrative that their corporate sponsors pay them to. That is to jump to conclusions and blame Russia as behind every attack.
    11
  2872. China's digital Renminbi allows short-term visitors to China to enjoy the convenience of WeChat/Alipay, all without the requirement of setting up a Chinese bank account. So hopefully it will draw more international tourists to China.
    11
  2873. USA and Europe also "solve" low birth rates by importing immigrants, which cause all sorts of social problems for the locals. Like Muslims refugees and immigrants come to your predominantly Christian country, but they keep to their old traditions, wearing Muslim headveils, because Western free religious laws allow them to. Instead of assimilating, they convert more Muslims through marriage and they tend to have higher birth rates than Caucasian birth rates.
    11
  2874.  @arturganczarski500  You said: "Also, as a westerner, I never felt superior to the Chinese or Asians in general, neither inferior." Josep Borrell's said: "Europe is a Garden, and the rest of the world is a Jungle. The Garden must protect itself from the encroachment of the Jungle." Even though Asians are not specifically mentioned, his words reek of the Yellow Peril mentality of the phobia of the West being overrun by what they consider to be the "uncivilized" rest of the world. This sort of behavior is becoming more widespread in the West. You said: "However, China's unflinching and shameless support for Putin leaves me no illusions: Chinese moral bankruptcy beats even that of the US." China is neutral in the Ukraine conflict and advocates peaceful negotiation to end it. China maintains good relations with Ukraine as well as Russia, and China sends humanitarian aid to Ukraine, while continuing to do business with Russia. Whereas it's NATO countries that continue sending lethal aid to Ukraine and prolonging the conflict, so who is the one supporting conflict here?
    11
  2875.  @catmandu6776  You said: "Taking a weakness and presenting it as a strength is propaganda and that's exactly what you're doing when you're celebrating Beijing being the first city to host a winter and summer Olympics." I could argue the opposite, that taking a strength and presenting it as weakness is propaganda in itself, like what you're doing. Even if you claim Beijing was chosen out of necessity, isn't it an achievement that a place of necessity could become the first city to host both a summer and a winter Olympics? Clearly, you look down on Beijing, yet they broke Olympic history when they hosted both types of Olympics. It's like you're taking something positive and giving it a negative spin, wouldn't that be considered propaganda as well?
    11
  2876.  @catmandu6776  You said: "suppression of the Chinese people" What makes you think Chinese are suppressed? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your countries and spending coin on your tourism industries. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students studying the same topics as their Western peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, are expanding overseas, and Chinese investors are buying up real estate in your countries. So what makes you think Chinese people are suppressed? Chinese can be found virtually all over the world today, since we make up around 20% of the world's population.
    11
  2877.  @Andy-P  "While she was detained (illegally or not) she could move about meet people. Michaels could not" What sort of comparison is this? The two Michaels were arrested on espionage charges in China, of course they were in jail, whereas nobody even knows the actual crime that Meng allegedly committed, yet you want to compare how Meng could meet people whereas the Michaels couldn't?
    11
  2878.  @cchannel7857  Search for an article: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies (By Gregory Clark)
    11
  2879.  @MarkYeung1  Hong Kong actually held more elections AFTER the 1997 handover back to mainland China than it ever did for 150 years prior as a British colony.
    11
  2880. Abe was the one who wanted to abolished Japan's "pacifist" policy under Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution, which "outlaws war as a means to settle international disputes involving the state."
    11
  2881. Many Indians (but not all) tend to have the "colonial mentality", an affliction which continues to plague many former colonies long after decolonization. Even after British decolonization, the "decolonization of the mind" is still ongoing in India in order to reverse the damage inflicted by colonization on the minds of the colonised.
    11
  2882. Is this comment thread some kind of scam?
    11
  2883.  @Joe-ul3gh  Russia is expected to report record profits from sales of oil and gas to India, China and other countries apart from the West. Russia has the manufacturing capabilities. I mean, despite Western claims that Russia has run out of missiles, the missile barrages on Ukraine continues unabated.
    11
  2884. I hope that Eileen Gu not only inspires more Chinese athletes to take up winter sports here in China, but to also inspire oversea Chinese and people of Chinese descent to be proud of their motherland.
    11
  2885.  @currentchannel3452  David Fincher’s 1999 movie,《Fight Club》is based on author Chuck Palahniuk's 1996 novel of the same name. China’s ending is actually closer to Palahniuk’s original vision for the ending of “Fight Club,” as written in his 1996 book. As Palahniuk told TMZ while reacting to China’s censorship, “The irony is that the way the Chinese have changed it is they’ve aligned the ending almost exactly with the ending of the book, as opposed to Fincher’s ending, which was the more spectacular visual ending. So in a way, the Chinese brought the movie back to the book a little bit.” Palahniuk also said it was interesting that suddenly everyone cared about a censored “Fight Club” ending when he’s spent nearly his entire career fighting censorship and bans when it comes to his books. “My books are heavily banned throughout the U.S.,” Palahniuk said. “The Texas prison system refuses to carry my books in their libraries. A lot of public schools and most private schools refuse to carry my books. But it’s only an issue once China changes the end of a movie? I’ve been putting up with book banning for a long time.”
    11
  2886. China is not just any country, China a civilizational state. The Chinese see themselves as the keeper of Chinese civilization as a whole. So even though the guest is pro-independence (as he claim his Taiwanese friends to be as well), it's apparent that majority of the people of Taiwan are unable to divorce themselves from the concept of being Chinese. As the saying goes: "You can take the Chinese out of China, but you can't take the China out of Chinese."
    11
  2887. Anti-China sentiment is growing in Australia, even though Australia is located closer to Asia than America and China is Australia's biggest trading partner. Yet Australian politicians like Scott Morrison are fanning the flames of racism against China and following US's anti-China stance.
    11
  2888. @Random_Dude42 So you're agreeing that NATO is expanding eastwards right up to Russia's doorstep? Then all the more Russia is justified in its special military operation.
    11
  2889.  @michaelkatz275  You said: "And what is a matter with CCP?" The actual name of the party in Chinese is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where Zhōngguó (中国) means China and Gòngchǎndǎng (共产党) means Communist Party. Therefore the correct name should be the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the name Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is an incorrect terminology. Hopefully this helps in your understanding of the two terms.
    11
  2890. Agreed. Most Western MSM just skim over the technical details and jump to conclusion that Russia is to blame, whereas Brian helps explain the military specifications of the two missiles, the types of vehicles used to transport them, and the possibility that those vehicles can be used to transport other things like supplies.
    11
  2891. We need India, because India provides the only vowel in the name BRICS. Otherwise the countries cannot form a word with their initials.
    11
  2892.  Giovanni Sanchez  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    11
  2893. Western MSM specifically targeted Xinjiang cotton, because cotton-picking occupies a special place among Westerners as a lingering sense of shame over African slavery. But videos show that in Xinjiang, majority of Uighurs are driving cotton-harvesting machines to harvest truckloads of cotton, yet Western allegations of forced labour still persist.
    11
  2894. Good for you! They say it's easier to fool a person, than to convince him that he's been fooled. Especially when it comes to portraying China.
    11
  2895.  @brisbanerugby  Anti-China sentiment is growing in Australia, even though Australia is located closer to Asia than America and China is Australia's biggest trading partner. Yet Australian politicians like Scott Morrison are fanning the flames of racism against China and following US's anti-China stance.
    11
  2896. 老实说 翻墙后，就觉得很多美国人太无知，已经被美媒洗脑了。
    11
  2897. Cyrus is certainly a better choice. The past few U.S ambassadors to China like Max Baucus and Terry Branstad don't even speak Mandarin nor understand Chinese.
    11
  2898. Japan and Mexico actually done their homework on Meng Wanzhou and refused to cooperate with the USA, but Canada didn't do their homework and blindly agreed to detain Meng Wanzhou. This tells you that when USA tells you to do something, think twice before blindly accepting.
    11
  2899.  @lugaritzbrown2250  "神州 Shenzhou please explain how?" China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    11
  2900. And the name "Mount Everest" should also be changed to "Chomolungma" which is the local name that Tibetans call the mountain. Not sure what a name like Everest even has to do with the world's tallest mountain. Even China calls it 珠穆朗玛峰 (Zhūmùlǎngmǎ) which is derived from the Tibetan name.
    11
  2901. Putin evacuating children from a warzone to safety in Russia was a good thing that didn't deserved to be charged by the ICC. The children were also returned to Ukrainian parents or relatives once their relationship is proven.
    11
  2902. It's astonishing that even the current US Ambassador to China doesn't even speak Mandarin at all.
    11
  2903. Hollywood movies often portray Russians as the bad guys, while making the U.S miltary look cool. Special forces abseiling down from helicopters is a common trope in Hollywood movies and the Double-O Seven series makes clandestine activities by spy agencies seem cool and justified.
    11
  2904. The arrival of the Internet was supposed to usher in the Age of Information in the world. Yet the West is in an Age of Fake News, spreading uncontrolled like wildfires.
    11
  2905. forbidmyname iPhone is currently made by Chinese worker's wages, not American worker's wages, and people buy it mostly because it is a status symbol. But once the social status attached to owning an iPhone evaporates, then nobody would want the product anymore.
    11
  2906. When I think of American/Canadian Chinese food, usually I would expect it to taste different from authentic Chinese cuisine in China. Having been to China and sampling our street food youself, how the street food in Richmond Night Market compare to street food in China?
    11
  2907.  @markrussell5904  You said: "The population of Taiwan minus 0.001% want to be independent of China." Actually that's incorrect. According to polls in Taiwan, only a small minority (5.6%) want independence from the mainland as soon as possible. The vast majority (87%) of the people polled want the status quo to be maintained. And what is the status quo? The status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Any move to amend Taiwan's constitution or formally declare independence would be seen as changing the status quo, a scenario that the majority of people polled in Taiwan do not want.
    11
  2908. Agreed. One need only look into ASPI's funding in order to determine its ulterior motive.
    11
  2909. ​ @MarkYeung1  China banned Australian coal in 2020, not 2021. Also of these new markets, India is one, but given that India choose to abstain from voting in the UN assembly against Russia (like China did), it's possible that the U.S might decide to sanction India, which in turn might affect Australia's coal exports to India.
    11
  2910. @dhdy1213 Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongolians conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China, and incorporated them into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchurians did the same thing centuries later during Qing Dynasty.
    11
  2911. ​ @garymcmillan6943  Like I said, China's success has been achieved under the leadership of the CPC.
    11
  2912.  @Aikúsoul  "神州 Shenzhou Your brainwashed I’ve seen your comments on other channels" Care to attempt to refute my points then, since you claimed that I am brainwashed?
    11
  2913.  @stayprepared2388  Others don't blame China? Just look at the sheer amount of Western anti-China propaganda out there, blaming China for everything and how is China always blaming others? Many Westerners haven even set foot in China and see what life is like here for themselves, yet many already harbour negative opinion about our country.
    11
  2914.  SS3 Super  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    11
  2915.  @cspdx11  Vietnam had invaded Cambodia and overthrew the UN recognized Government of Kampuchea, and Vietnamese forces just occupied Cambodia without installing a new government. China is Cambodia's ally, so China decided to conduct a punitive expedition on Vietnam.
    11
  2916.  @nickiseb8910  "in the US I can at least open my mouth without being jailed for years." Tell that to Julian Assange, who is in prison just for revealing the U.S monitoring its allies activities.
    11
  2917.  @MarkYeung1  China has in fact put forth a peace process for Ukraine, and even Putin has welcome this plan. It's actually the US that's against this peace plan.
    11
  2918.  @chopper1239  Exactly, the Hong Kong rioters are like hyenas, they'll attack if they think they have the numbers, but won't do anything if they know cameras are capturing their violent act. Most important strategy is to do what is unexpected, according to Sun Zi's The Art of War 《孙子兵法》 The HK rioters clearly anticipated police breaking through their barricades, they didn't expect the public to dismantle their barricades.
    11
  2919. Agreed. Whereas when you try to improve yourself, you may also inadvertently spur others to improve themselves as well.
    11
  2920.  @andrenogueira5058  "神州 Shenzhou Fact: a substantial part - if not all - of Chinese debt was wasted in a mix of useless investments" Do you have evidence to substantiate your claims? Sri Lanka has opened a new railway line in 2019, The 26.75-km long Matara-Beliatta railway extension, built with China's assistance, connecting its coastal city of Matara and Beliatta, a move which will boost passenger traffic. You said: "The people of Sri Lanka are paying the heavy price of it and the corruption fueled by the Chinese "partners". " If anything, by investing in infrastructure, China is able to circumvent corruption in Sri Lanka because the money gets spent on actual, tangible benefits for the people of Sri Lanka, before it has a chance to get pocketed by corrupt officials. There's no way a corrupt official can pocket an entire railway line that's been built and opened to the public, isn't it? You said: "So, your argument is futile, just a biased and useless attempt to assert Chinese reckless lending policies." I use logic, cite examples and sources to support my argument. China only makes up 10% of Sri Lanka's debt, the remaining 90% of Sri Lanka's debt is owned by the West (including Japan and India), yet it seems you're determined to simply pin the blame of Sri Lanka's woes onto China that's all. You said: "In Sri Lanka's case, Chinese debt was just a great nail in its coffin." Once again, when you fill a glass beyond the brim until it overflows, how can you just blame the 10% extra water, instead of the 90% water that's already in the glass? It's like you just trying to pin the blame for Sri Lanka's economic woes on China that's all.
    11
  2921. Lazy Indonesians hate the hardworking Chinese people. Look at Indonesian government banning expressions of Chinese culture through language, religion, and traditional festivals in Indonesia and forcing Chinese Indonesian to adopt Indonesian-sounding names.
    11
  2922.  @tooltalk  China has never colonized Philippines throughout history, whereas the Philippines became a U.S colony after losing the American-Phillippines War.
    11
  2923. Tibet has been part of China since 800 years, when Mongolians conquered both Tibet and Song dynasty China and incorporated them as Yuan dynasty China.
    11
  2924. Some Indians are proud and nationalistic, looking down their nose on Chinese 'communism' and refuse to learn from China and instead they try to emulate the West instead. I mean, India is world's largest democracy and Republic of India was founded in 1947, whereas People's Republic of China was founded in 1949 (2 years later) Yet China has long overtaken India in many areas, so what has democracy done for India?
    11
  2925. Imperialism has left its mark all over the globe. On Africa for the natural resources. On the Middle East for the oil. On South America for the trade route (i.e Panama Canal). Soon, the Artic region for all of the above (rare earths, oil and gas and shorter trade routes).
    11
  2926. The population of Uighurs in China has actually grown from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China Yet the Western allegations of Uighur genocide still persist, when the population of Uighurs in China actually tripled in size over the years.
    11
  2927. ​ @이재명각하만세  Why are you talking to me about Ice Cream?
    11
  2928.  Gaylord Manlove  About dictatorship in China, the Chinese government has produced 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans etc, to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's political system. Whereas in the USA for example, the US presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short-term plans for America's future, instead of long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US's political system.
    11
  2929.  @Sp3ll633  You said: "Gotta love the Beijing smog" You're welcome to take it back to your country.
    11
  2930.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "With the repeated COVID lockdowns (especially the brutal one in Shanghai)," Shanghai had it's first lockdown, it's not a repeated lockdown (unlike in many Western cities that lockdown, reopened and lockdown again). Right now, Shanghai is easing up on lockdown measures.
    11
  2931. The White Australia policy is a term encapsulating a set of historical policies that aimed to forbid people of non-European ethnic origin, especially Asians (primarily Chinese) and Pacific Islanders, from immigrating to Australia, starting in 1901. ... (Source: Wikipedia: White Australia policy)
    11
  2932. The USA has been waging wars in Middle East Countries to control the oil and cut off the country's heads (Muammar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Next on the US list is Bashar al-Assad it seems.
    11
  2933.  @augustuswoods4548  Tibet is sensitive, because the 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and a traitor to his people. The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government (Beijing). Declassified CIA files have exposed that a total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) Source: CIA Tibetan program wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Costs So here we have concrete evidence that the 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the USA to engage in separatist activities against the Central People's Government.
    11
  2934.  @davidshears1449  I thought the OP's post is deliberately meant to be sarcastic.
    11
  2935. Seems like USA just start something in order to score political points at the polls, before seemingly losing interest and then abandoning the issue.
    11
  2936. I think what he is implying by "USA Made products come with a social status" is that once the social status attached to owning an iPhone evaporates, then nobody would want the product anymore.
    11
  2937.  @ngawangyoga9258  Then how else to provide electricity to supply Tibetan homes with heat during the harsh winters on the Tibetan Plateau? You are yoga instructor living comfortably in Paris, already burning fossil fuels, then why can't Tibetans in Tibet get to enjoy modern technology on the Tibetan Plateau? You really think that Tibetans in Tibet want to live as dirt-poor yak farmers or Buddhist monks? Here's a video of Tibetan craft brewer in Lhasa. Video: Worlds Highest Craft Beer Brewery - Lhasa Tibet youtu.be/UYCyhUyGuMw It's these places in Tibet that make use of the hydroelectricity generated by the dams. It's thanks to the infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, etc that Tibet can import food and supplies from the mainland to feed it's population and modernise Tibet, you overseas Tibetans just want Tibet to remain dirt-poor and undeveloped that's all. And if you claim it's some conspiracy then why did the U.S Navy aircraft carrier (USS Theodore Roosevelt) become a virus stricken ship? It's a maximum security ship and never reached China, yet already become a "virus carrier" Source: US Navy Fires Captain Who Sought Help for Virus-Stricken Ship thediplomat.com/2020/04/us-navy-fires-captain-who-sought-help-for-virus-stricken-ship/
    11
  2938. The wolf in the wild just want to be left alone, but they will attack if threatened or cornered. It's similar to how Chinese diplomats have been labelled as "Wolf Warriors" but wolves in nature will defend their territory, especially if constantly provoked.
    11
  2939.  @andrenogueira5058  How are Vietnam and India going to ship their Made-in-Vietnam or Made-in-India goods across the Pacific Ocean to the USA with the same volume as Made-in China goods? China is home to many of the world's busiest ports, can Vietnam or India even compete with China in this field? List of busiest container ports in 2020 1. Shanghai (China): 43,500 TEUs 2. Singapore (Singapore ): 36,600 TEUs 3. Ningbo-Zhoushan (China): 28,720 TEUs 4. Shenzhen (China): 26,550 TEUs 5. Guangzhou (China): 23,190 TEUs 6. Qingdao (China): 22,000 TEUs 7. Busan (South Korea): 21,590 TEUs 8. Hong Kong (China): 20,070 TEUs 9. Tianjin (China): 18,350 TEUs 10. Los Angeles (United States): 17,310 TEUs ... Source: Wikipedia: List of busiest container ports So how are Vietnam ports and Indian ports going to compete with Chinese ports, if they want to ship their goods across the Pacific Ocean to the U.S?
    11
  2940. Covid-19 is like a global test that everyone has to take. China studied extremely hard for the exam and passed with flying colours and we are now celebrating our well-deserved graduation ceremony. Whereas Western countries had extra time to prepare for the test, yet many Westerners laughed at China's misfortune and mocked China's answers as too "draconian." Yet now they are accusing China of cheating, yet they are now blatantly copying China's homework after ridiculing them earlier.
    11
  2941. In Dec 2011, London’s Daily Mail reported that the Zhengzhou New Area 郑州市 was China’s largest “Ghost City. But today Zhengzhou has a population of 9,378,000 inhabitants, and had a GDP of 913 billion in 2017. It just means that time is needed for people to migrate from rural countryside to the cities. If you don't believe me, then you can watch this beautiful and artistic video of Zhengzhou (Suggestion: Watch in HD for best experience) Video: 《Hello, ZHENGZHOU 》(by YaoKing) youtube.com/watch?v=jFdLkgDS-QE&t=8
    11
  2942. During the Vietnam War, the Americans deployed chemical weapons such as Agent Orange to devastating effect, damaging Vietnam's ecosystems and causing birth defects in Vietnamese children even till today. Maybe the purpose of an American false flag operations is to poison Ukraine like what they did with Vietnam.
    11
  2943. "East Turkestan" was a term coined in the 19th century to replace the common Western term for the region, "Chinese Turkestan." They literally recognized the region as part of China, but wanted a name to reduce its association with China and to promote separatism.
    11
  2944.  @performancefluid3666  Chairman Mao Zedong had no term limits that's true, but after his policies turned out to be hurting China, Mao made a self-criticism about his policies and later stepped down as state chairman, allowing other members like Deng Xiaoping to come forward with his economic reforms. The point remains that China has many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, etc to map out China's future in the years 2025—2050. This is something that can be achieved only by removing presidential term limits, so that our leaders can see China's long term policies till the end. Whereas the USA is unable to formulate any effective long term strategy against China, because their leaders have to step down after 4-8 years, so it's impossible to see where the USA will be in just 10 years time. This is further complicated by the fact that the two US parties (Republicans and Democrats) seem more interested in fighting each other than fighting for America's future. The 2 parties constantly take credit for America's successes and push the blame of America's failures onto the other side.
    11
  2945.  @performancefluid3666  But we are currently talking about term limits and if you accept German Chancellor having effectively no term limits, then why is it you won't accept it when China abolishes our presidential term limits? Do you see your double standards here?
    11
  2946. Colonizers not only colonized land, but they also colonize the minds of the local people in the process. Mental colonization continues to affect some people in India, long after the colonizers left. In fact, when the British first colonized India, India made up 25% share of the world's GDP. After the British left India, India's share of the global GDP dropped to just 4%.
    11
  2947. I hope Eileen Gu's example inspires more Chinese to take up winter sports here in China, as well as inspiring overseas Chinese and people of Chinese descent to be proud of their motherland.
    11
  2948. Dismantle the U.S Milt-Industrial Complex!
    11
  2949. China is not altogether isolated, or disconnected from the rest of the world. World events have shaped China, and so has China shaped world events similarly.
    11
  2950.  @Hanabis924  China's approach is to save lives at the expense of business. Loss of income and money is regrettable, but money lost can be earned back later. But if those elderly lose their lives, then no amount of money can bring back lives that have been lost.
    11
  2951.    You mock Chinese history? Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by the rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china) which were in great demand throughout the ancient world. Even the foreign conquerors of China, like Mongols and Manchu, ended up assimilating into Chinese culture.
    11
  2952.  @AmbietsRato  For all your talk about democracy, Ukraine is not even a democracy for crying out loud, yet it's just being accepted as one by the west? Zelenskyy is refusing to hold elections next year, and he has consolidated all opposition media into a single government media, so isn't this sort of behavior frowned upon in the West? And there's the fact that currently Ukraine is not a member of Nato too, yet why are they sending military aid to Ukraine?
    11
  2953.  @HermanWillems  Well, why is it that all of Nato (which includes the superpower that is the USA) defeat this super small country that is Russia? Even after slapping all those sanctions, Russia's economy is still projected to expand in 2024.
    11
  2954. Because politics should be about doing what's right, NOT what's popular. Sometimes, what's popular may not be what's right, and what's right may not be what's popular. Democracy, when reduced to its basic fundamentals, is primarily about doing what's popular, not necessarily what's right.
    11
  2955. Some Indians like to believe India is the center of global politics and everyone revolves around them.
    11
  2956. @comment sense China's GDP (nominal) is literally the world's 2nd largest and if you count GDP (PPP), China's is even larger than the United State's so what are you talking about? And the reason why China's GDP per Capita is low is because China has the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people. So on the per capita basis, if you divide our GDP by our enormous population, you'll arrive a low GDP per capita of course. Look at India (world's largest "democracy" with the world's 2nd largest population) and China's GDP per capita is 10x that of India's.
    11
  2957. @comment sense Then why aren't you bothered by the fact that Western chefs boil lobsters alive? Animals regarded as livestock get treated differently in different countries, so who are you to impose your beliefs onto other culture's perception of food?
    11
  2958. Agreed. Under KMT rule, China would most likely just become another pawn of the West, instead of truly independent.
    11
  2959.  @RockChatham  The Nationalist Kuomintang came to power through insurrection themselves, by overthrowing the previous Qing Dynasty China in 1912 and establishing the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949). The KMT were then overthrew by the Communists and the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 was founded in 1949. If you claim the KMT were the legitimate ruling government then shouldn't the Communists also be granted the same legitimacy given that they both came to power by overthrowing their previous governments respectively? As for the Japanese, when Imperial Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931, the KMT Generalissimo Chiang kai-Shek was reluctant to meet the invaders head-on, instead he continued purging communist (our own fellow Chinese) instead of repelling the Japanese invaders, until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng had to kidnap Chiang and force him to ally with the communists. This incident was known as the Xi'an Incident (西安事变). Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was thanks to communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release. Only then was Chiang willing to ally with the communists against the Japanese. Source: Wikipedia: Xi'an Incident
    11
  2960.  @RockChatham  If they were the legitimate government, then why'd did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War (yes, it's a civil war), the communists were at a severe disadvantage, while the KMT had massive wealth (taxed heavily from peasants) and they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, who only had 50 communist members at the beginning of 1921. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, outnumbered, starving communists peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates the KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China.
    11
  2961.  @antoine19634  Those kindergarteners have a safe and secure environment in which to learn and play in school. Once they graduate, they will have higher chances of enrolment in college or higher education, or being a productive member of society. Why can't China teach our kids to be loyal to China you tell me? Our country, our rules. If not, some of these Uighurs might become terrorist if swayed by Islamic extremism.
    11
  2962.  @fclp9713  The survey was conducted by reputable organizations like Harvard University and Ash Center, what makes you think the poll results are not truly representative? And the Communist Party of China have been known to take feedback seriously, like for example, Beijing had initially announced China's first vaccine mandate, but the idea was scrapped after online backlash from netizen. Whereas the Canadian truckers participating in the "Freedom Convoy" protests had their bank accounts frozen.
    11
  2963.  @koblongata  Why do you seem to have this "fixed mindset" that every country has to adopt Western style democracy to be successful? China's political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot), then is there a need for China to abandon this system (that works for us) and adopt Western Style democracy? Just because Westerners say so?
    11
  2964.  @danielb7253  According to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty; China's poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015. Life is getting better for many in China, and this includes the people living in the countryside.
    11
  2965.  @KarMengChow  Jon is right to a certain extend. Previously, I visited Singapore and spoke Mandarin to the locals. Some Singaporeans (but not all) started treating me coldly (especially when they hear the mainland accent). But when I switched to English, many Singaporeans started warming up to me. (Of course, this is just my personal experience that's all, and not necessarily reflective of all Singaporeans.)
    11
  2966. The thing is that right now, nobody else in the world knows exactly what's going to happen when lockdown is lifted. No other country has lifted lockdown after imposing it, so China is actually paving the way and showing what happens when lockdown is eventually lifted.
    11
  2967.  @junebug8485  The Russian Ruble is ranked the best performing currency this year. Also China will in no way let Russia fall, because if Russia collapses, China knows that NATO is coming after China next.
    11
  2968. Before I went to sleep, my wife was complaining to me: "This Russia is such a bad country, if Ukraine wants to join NATO, it is their business and freedom, Russia has no right to intervene. This is just an excuse for Russia to invade Ukraine." I said nothing, got out of bed and went to the kitchen, before returning to bed with knife in my hand. I told my wife: "Let's go to sleep" Upon seeing the knife, my wife sat up abruptly and looked at me with wide eyes. "What are you doing? Sleeping with a knife?!" she exclaimed. I replied: "Don’t worry about it, let’s go to sleep. Besides, me sleeping with a knife is none of your business and it is my freedom." My wife said: "You're crazy! How can I sleep when you are lying next to me with a knife? What if you accidentally cut me?" I replied: “Well, you don’t even trust your own husband, how can you expect Russia to trust Ukraine? Sleeping with a knife is like Ukraine joining the NATO." .... An anonymous analogy taken off Weibo.
    11
  2969. If other countries can't make it themselves, then it's made in China.
    11
  2970.  @elektrotehnik94  You said: "The New Atlas's problem is the fact he claims to know more than he knows & pretending that Russian sources are not strategic liars, with 80-90% lies." As far as I know, Brian's channel has been about using Western sources to debunk Western propaganda. I mean, has Brian ever used Russian sources on his channel? Look, in this video he's using BBC and The Guardian so what Russian sources are you referring to?
    11
  2971. It's like Wile E. Coyote chasing Road Runner off a cliff. Even though the ground has disappeared beneath him, he's still running on mid-air, and it's only a matter of time before reality "catches up" to him and he falls. That's how the U.S printing money is like.
    11
  2972. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go, (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    11
  2973. @prashanthb6521 You said: "We dont want any other ideologies except Democracy. Thats why we are closer to West." But could you explain what exactly has this ideology done for you? Democracy was artificially imposed onto India by the British through their education system. India wasn't a democracy before, and even as a British colony, India was under the authoritarian colonial rule of the British Empire, so why insist on keeping this ideology? India won't be able to grow out of coloniality as long as they continue to keep this mindset.
    11
  2974. Agreed. I showed people this short 3 min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China, and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA
    11
  2975. "Afrika is not poor in spite of the West its poor because of it." Precisely. Africa is rich in natural resources and untapped wealth, and that's why Western countries seek to colonize Africa. The people of Africa just need to find a way to harness Africa's wealth for themselves.
    11
  2976.  @SwedeenXBL  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Russia has proven NATOs existence by invading their neighbours time and time again and proving why Russias neighbours are applying for NATO." Are you going to ignore the fact that NATO bombed Yugoslavia (which was a neighbor of some NATO states) as well as NATO participating in the Afghan War and Libyan War? NATO is clearly not a defensive organization and it has expanded into 15 countries right up to Russia's doorstep.
    11
  2977. China should commemorate the ground where the spacecraft landed in Inner Mongolia, as a milestone of China's space exploration program.
    11
  2978.  @skyeagle3123  Perhaps because China has the coronavirus situation under control through lockdowns, unlike other countries? Whereas in the United States for example, the U.S government just let the Omicron variant roam free until their doctors and healthcare workers are swamped by the huge surge in Covid cases.
    11
  2979.  @skyeagle3123  So if people were dropping like flies and China wanted answers, then why'd China did all the hard work, like identifying the coronavirus strain? Why'd China sequence the coronavirus genome and shared this information with WHO, if China was supposedly keeping the coronavirus a secret? Chinese scientists even published several articles in The Lancet warning Western countries about the coronavirus and the impending pandemic if they don't take any precautions, but Western countries just ignored China's warning, and now they want to blame China for their country's disastrous handling of Covid domestically? And to answer your second question, the World Health Organization sent an investigation team to Wuhan, looking into the possible origins of Covid-19 and they arrived in Wuhan on Jan 2021. The team visited Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market and the Wuhan Institute of Virology and their findings indicate that the virus entered the market from outside, and they've all but dismissed the lab leak theory as "highly unlikely".
    11
  2980.  @gelinrefira  Exactly. Deng Xiaoping said: "摸着石头过河。" (Cross the river by feeling the stones with your feet.)
    11
  2981. "The past 200 years of Western dominance has been a historical aberration, and from 1 - 1800 AD, it was China and India that were the economic superpowers, not the West. All aberrations come to a natural end." - Kishore Mahbubani
    11
  2982. In 2010, Google even lost the majority market in China to their Chinese rival Baidu. While Google's market share climbed from 15% in mid-2006 to 31% in 2010, Baidu's shared increased its market share from 47% in mid-2006 to 64% in 2010, which is a significant lead. In the end, Google decided to withdraw from mainland China after losing majority market share to Baidu.
    11
  2983. That happened before previously in America with Japanese Americans during WWII.
    11
  2984. The United States (the biggest WHO contributor) contributes around $400 million to the World Health Organization, China only contributes about $40 million to WHO, yet Trump accuses WHO of being China centric?
    11
  2985.  @MarkYeung1  The Hong Kong extradition bill was proposed because a Hong Kong guy named Chan, took his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, before flying back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice for his crime, but Hong Kong has no extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to Hong Kong extradition laws. Do the HK protestors even know what they are protesting for? Have they read the bill and understood its contents in their entirety? And now that the extradition bill has been scrapped, a Hong Kong murderer walks free and there's no justice for the victim's family. Also, one of the 5 demands was that all arrested rioters be set free and cleared of criminal charges, even though they burned and vandalised Hong Kong public property. Why should Hong Kong police give in to the protestors unreasonable demands?
    11
  2986.  @GabrielEddy  "by the NPC, members of which are appointed by the ruling party." China's National People's Congress is composed of deputies elected from the provinces, autonomous regions, municipalities directly under the Central Government, and special administrative regions, and of deputies elected from the armed forces. Which of the members are appointed?
    11
  2987. Are the North Americans happy with you living on their lands? Do they tell you "Go back to China" or "Stop stealing our jobs" even when you attended their schools and grew up together with Caucasian school kids?
    11
  2988. On the other hand, the Russian rubleis ranked the strongest performing currency this year,
    11
  2989. China is currently at peace, and not at war with any country, since our last major war in 1979. China is helping drive the world economy, and building infrastructure in less developed nations like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Maldives and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, etc. But USA is warmonger involved in Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, etc, even in 21st century. US strategy is to cut off those countries heads (Muammar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, etc) and then install their own US puppet governments in place. Even now, President Trump is eyeing Syria and the Assad Regime is next on the list.
    11
  2990. The best thing is that most of Brian's sources come from Western news or from their official websites themselves and it's out there for anyone to read. Yet Western MSM can still trick their audiences by framing the narrative to suit their own agenda.
    11
  2991. Wet Markets provide fresh food and produce at affordable prices to people in China. Even other countries in Asia, Africa and South America also have wet markets. So why should China close our wet markets?
    11
  2992.  @johnsoltan965  Previously, Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region used to be plagued by terrorist attacks perpetrated by misguided Ughurs such as the 1992 Ürümqi bombings, the 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings, the 2010 Aksu bombing, the 2011 Hotan attack, 2011 Kashgar attacks, and the 2014 Ürümqi attack Source: 1992 Ürümqi bombings wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_bombings Source: 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings wikipedia.org/wiki/1997_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_bus_bombings Source: 2010 Aksu bombing wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Aksu_bombing Source: 2011 Hotan attack wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Hotan_attack Source: 2011 Kashgar attacks wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Kashgar_attacks Source: April 2014 Ürümqi attack wikipedia.org/wiki/April_2014_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_attack But thanks to the government program in Xinjiang, there have been no more terrorist attacks in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region since.
    11
  2993. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    11
  2994. Taiwan people's best bet is to vote for the Kuomintang in the next Taiwan election in 2024, which could potential lead to calming the cross-strait tensions.
    11
  2995.  @cchannel7857  Joshua Wong looks quite young, he hasn't graduated yet, get a job and apply for an apartment, yet he's already swept up by political fervor and he thinks he knows the best way to govern Hong Kong?
    11
  2996. Good News, Gonzalo Lira is alive and well. Video:youtu.be/R2yeSOcNlgE
    11
  2997. Agreed. If those Taiwan separatists want to declare independence, they'll have to get out of the Chinese territory of Taiwan, and find some other plot of territory to call their own.
    11
  2998.  @bigboss337  In 1971, the UN democratically voted to legitimatize the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and de-legitimatize the Republic of China 🇹🇼. The voting results for Resolution 2758 were 76 voted for, 35 voted against and 17 abstained. Since the PRC won the UN vote, the UN recognized PRC as China, and kicked Taiwan out of the UN Security Council.
    11
  2999. + EggMine "But I seriously don't think China will ever reach the level of influence the U.S. has today ... Unless China starts demonstrating compassion for others at that level..." China today is at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major war in 1979. Instead, China is focusing on infrastructure projects in less developed countries like Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Maldives, and also African countries like Kenya, Nigeria, Angola, etc. But the USA is involved in wars even in 21st century, such as Afghan War, Iraq War, Libya War, etc, and is cutting off those country's heads (Muammar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, etc) and then installing their own US puppets in place. Now President Trump is bombing Syria, and the Assad Regime is next on the list. So you want China to exhibit "compassion for others" like what USA is doing to the Middle East?
    11
  3000.  @oliverbanes5121  How is China the biggest threat to the world? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w Which country is the real threat to global peace and stability?
    11
  3001.  Steve Bingham  If you want to talk about prison populations then it's actually America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rates and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate
    11
  3002.  @jabertagi3857  Uighurs had their own traditional culture long before the Islamic invaders came and converted them to Islam. Just search online for pictures of "Uighur Girls" and see how beautiful they look dressed in their traditional Uighur garb. Why Islam come and cover up their pretty faces with ugly black Muslim headveil?
    11
  3003.  @adamiskandar5107  The Western aid given to countries struck by natural disasters around the world was not given freely as often presumed, and such aid sometimes come with strings attached. For example, the recipient country might had to meet the requirement of being a "liberal democracy" in order to qualify for receiving aid. Academicians, thinkers and other philosophers also existed in other parts of the world, like for example Confucius. Confucius had a dream of a Great Unity (大同) in which he describes the ideal human to human relationship for the whole world.
    11
  3004.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  You said: "Evidently the PLAN have shown they can use the port." A Chinese research ship docked at Hambantota port, but it was only with the permission of the Sri Lankan authorities and it is only granted access to the port on the condition that it will keep the Automatic Identification System (AIS) switched on within the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of Sri Lanka and no scientific research to be conducted in Sri Lankan waters. Also, this research ship docking in the port doesn't debunk the fact that Chinese debt-trap diplomacy has proven to be a myth. You said: "Then again Brautigam commenting on the geography of the port is like Lee Barrett providing commentary on HIMARS." Seems like you're just resorting to the fallacy of hurling ad hominem attacks against the person itself rather than addressing what's been brought up in the report itself.
    11
  3005.  @lFurinl  I heard that under the Soeharta Government, the Chinese festivals were banned in Indonesia, and that ethnic Chinese in Indonesia were pressured to adopt Indonesian-sounding names.
    11
  3006.  @miltonfriedman3593  Google left China of their own accord, because they were losing their market share to Chinese company Baidu. Even though Google's market share climbed from 15% in mid-2006 to 31% in 2010, Baidu's market share increased from 47% in mid-2006 to 64% in 2010, which is a huge lead. Source: Forbes: Why Google Is Quitting China forbes.com/2010/01/15/baidu-china-search-intelligent-technology-google.html Furthermore, Baidu offers several popular features for Chinese market as compared to Google, so that's why Google choose to exit the Chinese market voluntarily. Because Google failed to tap into Chinese interests and secure a market in China.
    11
  3007.  @1forSave_Palestine  India is important because it provides the only vowel (I), so that the word BRICS can be properly pronounced.
    11
  3008. Corruption is universal problem faced by governments all over the world. But at least President Xi Jinping is actively cracking down on corruption in the party. But look at other countries like USA, and Hilary Clinton is corrupt politician and initially during the presidential campaign, Donald Trump wanted to jail her. But after he became president, the investigation into Clinton's mysterious emails have been dropped.
    11
  3009. Truly ironic how the actual historical aggression of Imperial Japan is forgotten so easily by Australia, yet it's somehow China is being viewed in such a perception despite having no real history of conquest towards Australia.
    11
  3010. +CedarHunt China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since faded to history. China has a wealth of political literature to draw thousands of years of experience in how to govern a country, all written and preserved in books by Chinese scholars, historians, strategists, philosophers, and so on. The KMT (Taiwan) had their chance to rule the mainland, but they failed and they lost the mainland to the Communists and fled to Taiwan. How are they fit to be called the real government of China then?
    11
  3011. Correct. In the span of 30 years, China has succeeded not only in reining in the Kubuqi desert's spread, but also turned 6,000 sq km of the desert－one-third of it－green.
    11
  3012. Photographs and videos show that the rocket part faces the northeast, which means that the missile may have arrived from the southwest, which is the direction of Ukrainian controlled territory such as Dobropillia. So it's possible that this attack on Kramatorsk was orchestrated by Ukrainian forces themselves.
    11
  3013. 茶叶蛋好高大上。前天狠心把房子卖了，消费了一把茶叶蛋，果真是好吃。等我有钱了，我要去台湾吃茶叶蛋。
    11
  3014.  Beast Mode  The people of Barbados elect her to be their leader, to speak out and solve their country's problems. It's not as though her keeping quiet will solve Barbados's problems.
    11
  3015. I remember when Trump supported the Saudi Arabian prince's killing of a journalist (Khashoggi) and Trump even called the journalist "an enemy of the state". Even after Trump, the Biden Administration is reluctant to call out the Saudi prince's actions. Seems like USA has double standards with regards to criticizing monarchies in Saudi Arabia and in Thailand.
    11
  3016. Its actually a Western myth that student protestors actually died on June 3rd and 4th in 1989 that night in Tiananmen Square. The so-called massacre has been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time - among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies by Gregory Clark Source: https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053 I mean, in the above footage, where exactly does it show tanks shooting at students in Tiananmen Square?
    11
  3017.  @MarkYeung1  Have you read about the 1850 Taiping Rebellion during Qing Dynasty? The uprising was led by a man (Hong Xiuquan) who had proclaimed himself to be the "brother of Jesus Christ" and sought to covert the Han people to his syncretic version of Christianity (as well as overthrowing the Qing dynasty). This led to one of China's most bloodiest civil wars with an estimated death toll of 20-30 million. This is what happens when religions get hijacked for political purposes, which is why in China, the government is above religion, and exercises authority over all religion in China in order to prevent this tragic mistake from happening again in China.
    11
  3018.  @rksleung  You said: "Meanwhile, the CCP was doing all it could enriching themselves during the sino-japanese war." The Nationalist Kuomintang were taxing the peasants heavily and even received U.S aid. But corruption was rampant among the KMT ranks, and they pocketed some $750,000,000 worth of U.S aid, so much such that even U.S President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves."
    11
  3019. Why do you people claim China has not come up with an entirely new invention or technology since some 2000 years? Paper, compass and gunpowder are some of the most recognisable Chinese inventions in the last 2000 years.
    11
  3020. Actually, Indonesian government is the one who physically blew up Chinese fishing vessels. Why Indonesia destroy other countries fisherman's livelihood just like that? Chinese coast guard don't destroy Indonesian or Malaysian fishing vessels by exploding your boats so why destroy other people's property?
    11
  3021.  @aksbeixhev  Who says that there is no rule of law for foreigners in China? There was Canadian drug trafficker Schellenberg, caught by Chinese police and normally, the punishment for drug trafficking in China is death. But because he was Canadian, the court only sentenced him to the imprisonment. But Schellenberg applied for an appeal, despite his lighter sentence, so the Chinese Court sentenced him to death as under proper Chinese law.
    11
  3022.  @vietnguyen4312  Why are you labeling me with unnecessary titles? And what scooter are you talking about?
    11
  3023.  @vietnguyen4312  Pray tell, what is it that you think I'm up to? Answering your questions?
    11
  3024. As Chinese, I can attest to Firen Wolf's elaboration, that simply changing Japanese as in language (日本語) to Japanese as people (日本人) is still wrong. The war is fought between our "countries" not between "people" so it shouldn't be 日本人. Although the uploader didn't specify whether he's using Japanese or Chinese, it should at least be changed to 日中戦争 which conveys the meaning much better.
    11
  3025.  @APBpa  The Maidan Revolution was supported by ultra-nationalist, neo-nazis, I would recommend watching Oliver Stone's 2016 documentary Ukraine on Fire which goes into detail how the seeds of fascism were planted in Ukraine during Nazi Germany, and had gone unpunished, so they were allowed to sprout and take root in Ukraine.
    11
  3026.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Hopefully, one day China will allow freedoms in Hong Kong." -The Economic Freedom of the World ranks Hong Kong first with a score of 8.91. -Index of Freedom in the World gives Hong Kong SAR a score of 8.81 out of 10. -Human Freedom Index gives Hong Kong a score of 8.41. ... Yet you seem to think mainland China does not allow freedoms in Hong Kong?
    11
  3027.  @everythingandmore5537  Because there was no confirmation of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus back in December 1st 2019. You think China magically know everything about the coronavirus on Day 1? All these data and information need to be recorded, checked and confirmed before submitting the report, otherwise it would be a false alarm. Another thing is even had China reported it earlier, so what? Western democracies failed to take the necessary precautions, they laughed at China's misfortune and mocked China's temporary hospitals as "concentration camps" what good will reporting earlier do, if Western democracies failed to act? You're just blaming China for Western democracies inability to deal with the coronavirus pandemic at home. China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019, but the WHO did not want to send a team to Wuhan, then why blame China? What would the WHO team even do, to arrest the spread of Covid-19 across the Western democracies?
    11
  3028. Perhaps even build cities on the Moon one day.
    11
  3029. Many Chinese are optimistic and look forward for a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners tend to be pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    11
  3030.  @Andrew-rc3vh  China building a railway parallel to one built over a 100 years ago by the British isn't akin to China following the colonial footsteps of the British though.
    11
  3031. If the leader shown to be capable of leading the country, then I personally don't see whats wrong with leaving him in power, in order to maximize the benefits to China. The government has many 5-year plan, 10-year plan, 20-year plan to map out China's future and to achieve specific goals by 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc. Countries like USA have presidential term limits of 4-8 years, so they can only plan short-term since there is no guarantee that they'll remain in power after that.
    11
  3032.  @Tespri  "by showing how it looks like in tourist spot during day time?" I'm pretty sure Cyrus would be glade to show you how Shanghai is at night, especially just how safe the streets of Shanghai are.
    11
  3033. But most Westerners see "communism" as dirty word, and refuse to even consider its possibilities. Maybe right now, communism doesn't work, because people are assumed to be greedy, selfish, etc. But maybe far ahead in future, say 1000 years, maybe human attitude improved to the point where like Confucius said, that if you see widow, orphan, disabled, etc, on the streets, humans will still care for them like one of our own.
    11
  3034.  @cheezeeeboi8699  "literally lied about how westerners didn't shake his hand, " When did Pan Zhanle ever said Westerners didn't shake his hand? He did said that he waved at Chalmers before the men's 100m freestyle which wasn't acknowledged, but could you quote me Pan's words claiming that Westerners didn't shake his hand?
    11
  3035.  @wtice4632  "There is no future with the DPP." (There, corrected it for you.)
    11
  3036. Agreed. This is reminisce of the 1962 Cuban missile crisis where Soviet missiles were deployed to Cuba, and posed an existential threat to the United States. Many applauded U.S President Kennedy for his strong stance, and refusal to back down, and eventually the Soviets withdrew their missiles. Fast forward till today and Ukraine joining NATO would allow NATO to deploy troops and missiles right onto Russia's doorstep representing an existential threat to Russia, just as Cuban missiles did for the USA in 1962.
    11
  3037.  @MarkYeung1  "Chinese people should have as free internet as USA." Many people on YouTube have reported that their comments have been censored, or that their uploaded videos aren't receiving the intended viewership.
    11
  3038. Chinese Tiangong-1 spacestation was launched in 2011, with expected operational lifespan of only 2 years. But its already 2018 and the station is long decommissioned since then and is merely falling to Earth at the end of its lifespan. Just like American spacestation Skylab fell in 1979, this is the natural conclusion to the spacestation at the end of its life.
    11
  3039. "When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say.” — George R.R. Martin
    11
  3040. Beijing is now the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both the Summer Olympics (Beijing 2008) and the Winter Olympics (2022).
    11
  3041.  @alexloong6396  Nowadays, nearly everyone has a camera handphone and can snap pictures anywhere, anytime. Cars often have dashboard cameras recording everything, so what's this talk about privacy? People even post selfies on social media detailing where they have been, yet you're worried about surveillance cameras?
    11
  3042. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    11
  3043.  @dinesh50448  You said: "CCP Don't have members but slaves" India has 18 million modern slaves - at least five times more than any other country in the world
    11
  3044.  @HiddenAgendas  Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: MBA Skool: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019
    11
  3045. Many fresh graduates haven't even found a job and stabilized their income, yet they already find themselves shackled by student loans and worried about paying off their debt. Student debt has even discouraged intelligent people from low-income families from pursuing a higher education.
    11
  3046. To answer your question at the end: many Westerners believe the war in Ukraine began just over a month ago, when in fact it had been ongoing for 8 years prior, in which some 13,000 have been killed in the Donbas War. Russia did not start a war, they are putting an end to one that began in 2014.
    11
  3047. China is the 3rd country in the world to send people to space, after USA and USSR. In 2008, China became 3rd nation to conduct "spacewalk" during Shenzhou-7 mission, in which Chinese astronaut exited the spacecraft beyond Earth's atmosphere. You can watch the video in the link below. Video: youtube(dot)com/watch?v=gMxQEHfU6hM
    11
  3048. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. In contrast, many Westerners (but not all) tend to be pessimistic and have a bleak outlook of the future.
    11
  3049. No other country seems interested in cleaning up space junk, so China is at least willing to pursue something new.
    11
  3050.  @realmaniac  I don't speak Korean (nor am I interested) then why should I move to a country with high literacy in the Korean language?
    11
  3051.  @ginxxxxx  Let's say I give you the benefit of the doubt, and that somehow USA has the necessary labor pool and machinery to refine their own "best rare earths" (as you call it) as well as overcoming environmentalists will. Are American workers willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers? If not then the price of America's rare earths will be more expensive than China's rare earth metals, and USA will have a hard time competing. After investing huge amounts of money, manpower and machinery to refine their own rare earths, the end result may be too expensive and that it's cheaper to just buy rare earths from China.
    11
  3052. @Ben Benito Printing more U.S dollar is only going to lead to worsening inflation as the value of the U.S dollar decreases as it is being printed. The fact that U.S dollar is a fiat currency and backed by nothing, means that it's only a matter of time before a crash happens (if it hasn't happened already). The U.S Dollar is like the cartoon where Wild. E Coyote chases the Road Runner off a cliff, and he continues running on empty air, before realizing that there's nothing supporting him underneath.
    11
  3053.  @liebuster-u2f  You're talking about protectionism? According to Global Trade Alert, the US is the world's most protectionist country, having taken over 800 protectionist measures since 2008. Even the EU has over 300 protectionist measures whereas China's is in the range of 200-300.
    11
  3054. China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia have since succumbed to history. Thus, Chinese politicians have access to a wealth of political literature and governing manuals on how to best govern China.
    11
  3055. Precisely. They were the only ASEAN country to have done so too. Russia's response was to include Singapore on a list of "unfriendly countries"
    11
  3056.  @EdGee1989  That's what a gamer would do. Just follow whatever action the game prompts them to do, instead of looking at things objectively. Such people should stick to gaming, not realpolitik.
    11
  3057. About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    11
  3058.  @georges5183  "See those ppl from HK to the UK." I was surprised to learn that for decades the British Royal Navy employed Chinese laundry workers (predominantly from Hong Kong) to clean their uniforms. With the deteriorating UK-China relations, the British Navy is no longer hiring Chinese (even from Hong Kong) and is switching to Nepalese laundry workers.
    11
  3059.  @dongshengdi773  "神州 Shenzhou That's why Taiwan GDP per Casita is 3 times bigger than China." Because mainland China has the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people, compared to Taiwan island's population of 23 million. So on a Per Capita basis, if you divide China's GDP by our enormous population, then obviously mainland China's GDP per capita will be lower than Taiwan's GDP per capita. I mean, if you want a more accurate comparison, then just look at India (world's 2nd most populous country) and the GDP per capita of India is way lower than China's GDP per capita.
    11
  3060.  @knowitall5913  Please note that I said Chinese are willing learn more about America, but that's not the same as China copying Western brand of democracy. Learning more about America means learning the good and the bad, learning what works and what doesn't, and improving upon China in the our own way.
    11
  3061.  @MarkYeung1  Stalemate? Russia has recently added 4 oblasts, namely Kherson, Zaporizhzhia and the two republics, Donetsk and Luhansk. Russia has defeated Ukraine in battle of Mariupol, Bakhmut, Zaporizhzhia and it looks as though Avdiivka will soon be under Russian control, so how is this a statemate? Also, the mainland Chinese government has stated many times that they are committed to peaceful reunification on the Taiwan Strait. However, the current DPP government in Taiwan is the one advocating independence, so the mainland will not rule out the military option. If Taiwanese want a government that's committed to reunification, they should vote for the KMT party next year.
    11
  3062. Although Taiwan is at the cutting edge of making chips unbelievably small, humans are approaching the theoretical limit of just how small we can make chips. While silicon-based chips are reaching their physical limits, some experts believe that carbon-based chips (made of graphene) will form the next foundation material for semiconductors. Carbon-based chips offer several advantages over silicon-chips, such as better conductivity, faster transmission, better heat dissipation, lower power consumption, 3D stacking, and so on. Because of this, mainland China is investing in carbon-based chips and recently made several breakthroughs in the manufacture of such chips.
    11
  3063.  @sreeniv09  You said: "We are also worried about Security in South Pacific where China is building all those Naval base." In the South China Sea, China has 12 sites, whereas Vietnam occupies 21 islands on which it has built runways, piers, barracks, storage tanks, and gun emplacements. Malaysia and the Philippines, have 5 and 9 sites respectively, occupied by naval detachments. So isn't Vietnam the one that's militarizing the South China Sea? You said: "China has always been problem to India.. We call it expansionism" China and India had historically maintained peaceful relations for thousands of years of recorded history, it's only after the British colonized India and arbitrarily drew up India's borders without consulting China's input on the matter. You said: "However its a threat to India and I think many other bordering countries and also Taiwan" Taiwan is not a country, even India recognize Taiwan as part of China. It's India that's being taught by Western media to treat China as a threat, but China has no plans to conquer India. I mean, China is already the world's most populous country, why would China want to conquer India, the world's 2nd most populous country? For what reason?
    11
  3064. Zelenskyy is already complaining about Indian PM Modi meeting with Russian President Putin.
    11
  3065. Here's an analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    11
  3066. The "war" would be more about economic power and cyber-security than actual soldiers and tanks.
    10
  3067. Most of the Chinese here understand English enough to respond to you. How does that make them not understand any other writing? I also did not imply in anyway that Korean is Inferior, I was just showing you the complexity of such a "simple" language. I also don't see how a "short" language is bad, it makes it more efficient to express more words in a sentence.
    10
  3068. Ah maybe I should have phrased it differently. When I meant forced on to natives I meant it being spread in a more subtle way. The invaders usually teach their language to a few educated (or holding positions of power) people and let them be the leaders and translators of the nation. The British and Spanish Empires are good examples (which is why Mexicans speak Spanish till today). A well-established language like English and France would only result in a few word transfers whereas less developed nations would probably be force to adopt an entire language. Even after the invaders have left, the language may be adopted by natives (it has been "seeded into the native soil, waiting to sprout in future generations"). Thus, we have the proliferation of English across the globe from the British Empire. As for the second part, I did not claim that China was completely unique, but "one of the few". The method you described does occur, but it was difficult, dangerous and expensive to send people abroad. Only wealthy nobles with many children to spare could afford to do so. This form of language transfer probably has minimal effect on the local language. I was actually trying to say that Kanji was not forced onto Japan by China and that they could choose to drop it anytime, like Vietnam and Korea. Chinese characters were created to suit China and that there will be problems if you borrow it as Kanji. There was no need to call this writting system horrible. In fact let me show you an example. 子 -> Child, 老 -> Old person, So 孝 -> Filial (Elder supported by Child, Confucius Belief) and if we add 文 -> Culture, we get 教 -> Teach (Parent talking to Child about Culture) Just to show that there's logic behind these characters.
    10
  3069. Husow Koopa We like to believe that complexity is what defines human language and allows humans to be creative and inspired to create greater and greater unnecessary complexities.
    10
  3070. Both India and China are countries with long history and diverse cultures. India is one of world's oldest cradles of civilization and China has 5000 years of history. India was birthplace of many of the world's oldest religions like Hinduism, Sikhism and Buddhism, of which Buddhism later spread to China, hence, the old Chinese name for India is Tianzhu (天竺) meaning "Heavenly Place". China also have Confucianism and Taoism, of which Confucianism later spread to Japan and Korea. Indian writing system like Sanskrit has influenced the writing of South East Asian countries like Myanmar and Cambodia, while Chinese writing has influenced Japan and Korea's writing systems. As the world's most populous countries, we face possible overpopulation problems, which is why China has 1-child policy and India once had 2-child policy. With such a large student population, there is fierce competition for top schools and higher education. Our countries are also plagued with social problems like human rights issues, caste system, minority rights issues, different dialects and so on. We should cooperate to solve problems common to our countries instead of competing with one another.
    10
  3071. +Lazzii Lopper As of 2017, you can add World's largest radio telescope (FAST) to that list.
    10
  3072.  @yslee1401  You said: "Some Mainland Chinese completely forgotten about Tiananmen Square massacre" That's a myth. The truth was that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square in June 1989. A Chilean diplomat (Carlos Gallo and his wife) were visiting Beijing at that time and provided eyewitness account of the events unfolding inside Tiananmen Square. He did not observe any mass firing of guns inside the Square, and he said that the troops entering the Square were armed with mostly truncheons and wooden clubs (i.e anti-riot gear).
    10
  3073.  @ashpatel2505  China enjoys reasonably good relations with the majority of our land neighbors. We have signed land border agreements with all our neighbors, except for India and Bhutan. -In 1964, China signed border agreement with North Korea. -In 1991, China signed Sino-Soviet border agreement with Russia. -In 1962, China signed border agreement with Mongolia. -In 1994, China signed border agreement with Kazakhstan. -In 1996, China signed border agreement with Kyrgyzstan. -In 2011, China signed border agreement with Tajikistan . -In 1895, China signed border agreement with Afghanistan. -In 1963, China signed border agreement with Pakistan. -In 1960, China signed border agreement with Nepal. -In 1960, China signed border agreement with Myanmar. -In 1992, China signed border agreement with Laos. -In 1999, China signed border agreement with Vietnam. ... Only border disputes with India and Bhutan remained unresolved.
    10
  3074.  @ashpatel2505  "And what kind of world order China is building? Yes it includes Russia, North Korea!" Lol Russia and North Korea ARE a part of this world that we live in, are they not? Why should we exclude them from world affairs just because the West says so? And didn't I mention earlier that just like China, India does not condemn Russia's special military operation in Ukraine? Yet you criticize China while praising India.
    10
  3075.  @ashpatel2505  It's astonishing you seek to lecture me about "Colonial Mentality", yet you also tell me to educate myself from the "proper history books" from democratic countries. What makes you think the history told in the books from democratic countries represent the proper history? Did your colonial mentality tell you that their history is the proper history? And you also claim that people don't have to set foot in China to know about the Chinese government? Then what makes you think you can lecture someone who's actually from China?
    10
  3076. Taiwan island inalienable part of China, yet Japan sailed warships through the Taiwan strait.
    10
  3077. By now, I think everyone has seen this footage (video:youtu.be/8ekA9skT7QQ ) of a missile slamming into an apartment in Kiev and leaving a gaping hole in the building with the structure still intact. It turns out that this was an Ukrainian missile, not a Russian missile that malfunctioned and hit their own building in Kiev.
    10
  3078.  @nadiasawicki4108  "Really? If that is the case why has China got half the world's grain?" China has the world's largest population so of course we need to secure our food sources. Furthermore, Western countries literally slapped sanctions on wheat from Russia (world's largest wheat exporter) then why blame China for Western countries sanctioning of Russia? You said: "Why do they need harbours everywhere?" Because harbours are needed for maritime trade. The question you should be asking is why USA needs military bases all over the globe.
    10
  3079. Excellent points, but if I may add one more point for America: they come to Africa to "virtue-signal".
    10
  3080.  @camt8804  So because USA made up charges of espionage for Julian Assange, you "suppose" it must be true. But when China provides grounds for arresting Yang Hengjun on charges of espionage, you call it "what seems like very vague charges"? "Nobody outside Australia knows who he is but in our country he's always in the news." Meanwhile, Australian journalist Julian Assange hardly ever makes the news in Australia during his detention period. Instead, their media encourages their audience to focus on Yang Hengjun.
    10
  3081.  @rolyrodriguez1000  But Ukraine's democracy hijacked after the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukoyvch by the U.S and installing their own U.S puppet government into Ukraine.
    10
  3082.  @Beardog53  Having the strongest piece in the game doesn't necessarily guarantee victory for the player. Russia still has the best anti-aircraft missile defense system in the world. It's more about how you use your pieces to secure victory in the end.
    10
  3083.  @DERISNER  "You're giving China and Russia way too much credit, my friend." China was once a poor, war-torn, starving country in the past. Fast forward till today, and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (or largest if you go by GDP PPP), the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Chinese government. I can't speak for Russia. But what I do know is that the Russian President has transformed Russia since he came to power and that the majority of Russians have expressed support for him, much like how majority of Chinese express support for the Chinese government. As long as our governments are able to deliver progress for the people, then our leaders will continue to enjoy support from Russians and Chinese respectively.
    10
  3084.  @MrDylsha  So when the Westerners invest money into Africa, it is positive, but when China does the same, it is negative? Westerners has had centuries to develop Africa, yet it seems that only in the last few decades with Chinese investment, did African nations start becoming more developed. Here are some examples of infrastructures projects in Africa funded by Chinese. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Poty Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China youtube.com/watch?v=TtduKDpy4oc
    10
  3085.  @vivafreedom4947  The graduates may make more money in the West, but the cost of living is higher in the West than in China. The cost of living in China is (generally) cheaper than in the West. Food is cheaper, rent is cheaper, gas and electricity aren't as expensive as they are in the West. Transportation costs are lower, the bus fare and train fare are affordable in China, and you can even rent bikes as an affordable mode of transportation.
    10
  3086.  vlADOLF PUTLER  You said: "Russia ain't doin' so good." The Russian ruble is literally the best-performing currency in the world this year, and although it took a hit when sanctions were imposed on Russia, the ruble has since recovered to its pre-military operation levels and is actually stronger than before.
    10
  3087. As a Chinese myself, I find many Hollywood movies lack Asian representation after all, and Asian actors (Chinese, Koreans, Japanese) are often casted into clichéd roles like martial artist, triad thugs, nerdy but socially inept guy, hackers, etc. Asian actresses are often casted as damsels in distress (for the white male lead to rescue) or prostitutes, massage parlour workers, dragon ladies, and other sexualised roles. Then there's also "white-washing," where characters of Asian descent are protracted by white characters (Take Scarlet Johanson in Ghost in the Shell for example) Hopefully, China's influence on Hollywood will shift its target demographics and in the process, help grant more roles to aspiring Asian actors/actresses.
    10
  3088.  Cheng-Tso Hsieh  Now China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours.
    10
  3089.  @fireturkeyfly11  China's government has demonstrated that there can be both improvements to people's standard of living (i.e poverty alleviation) as well as innovation and exploring the space frontier.
    10
  3090. If Indians can defend India, then why can't I defend China too? You accuse me of being Chinese puppet just for stating Chinese military technologies? China is 3rd country in world to demonstrate anti-satellite capabilities in 2007, by taking out a 750 kg satellite in orbit at altitude of 865 km, using missile launched from the ground. If China takes out Indian army satellites in space, then how are Indian troops on the ground going to coordinate without satellite support?
    10
  3091.  @marioreissmann7457  Having a plan is better than not having one. If you fail to plan, it means you plan to fail. Where do you see America in 10 years time? Or in 20-30 years time?
    10
  3092.  @billyehh  Shinzo Abe served Japan longer than President Xi, yet you're already labeling it as leader for life?
    10
  3093. Gautama Buddha himself was actually born in Nepal, not India.
    10
  3094.  @Nesher92  Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    10
  3095.  @valeenoi2284  I've heard Canadian PM Trudeu made it illegal to call transgender people by the improper pronoun (he/she/it) that they don't identify with, it would be considered a hate crime and you can go to jail for doing that. Talk about freedom of speech.
    10
  3096. MissingNOLA The link below plots the increase in life expectancy in China and compares it to USA, Europ and India Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India: 1950-2100 Source: china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once dirt-poor and starving country just like India in the past, and while there were mistakes made by the CCP, under their leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, poverty fell and literacy rose. According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat, considering that China is world's most populous country, yet achieving 6.5% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Also, why are you getting so "sickened" over something that happened some time ago? Many Chinese people today have long since gotten over it and moved on, then why are you feeling such strong emotions in the name of Chinese?
    10
  3097. It's just as bad when a different body waste product (something more solid) hits the fan.
    10
  3098.  @Andy-P  You said: "China a low wage economy...." The cost of living in China is (generally) lower than in high-wage countries. Food is cheap. Rent is cheap. Gas and electricity is cheap, since China is buying cheap Russian gas in Rubles or Renminbi. Transportation is cheap, since you can simply rent bikes at affordable rates. Compare that to the cost of living in high-wage countries.
    10
  3099.  @arturganczarski500  Russia had wanted promises from the West that Ukraine would not be allowed to join NATO. Remember, NATO was formed in response to Soviet Union's rise, but after the 1991 USSR dissolution, NATO no longer serves any interests except the U.S interests in maintaining global hegemony. NATO had promised Gorbachev that NATO would not expand eastwards, yet that promise was not upheld, and NATO already expanded into 14 countries right up to Russia's doorstep. Ukraine joining NATO was the last straw, and after realizing that for years, his words had fallen on deaf ears in the West, Putin finally decided to act.
    10
  3100.  Pain Zer0  According to an article published in The Atlantic by authors Deborah Brautigam and Meg Rithmire, their research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country.
    10
  3101.  @catmandu6776  "神州 Shenzhou nice try but no." So it appears that you have double standards when it comes to propaganda. When I try to portray something as good, it's called propaganda in your mind, but when you try to portray something as bad, it isn't propaganda in your eyes? You said: "The US has about 20 cities that have the infrastructure to host the Olympics tomorrow." Good for the USA. But if those 20 cities have the potential to showcase both the Winter and Summer Olympics, why is it Beijing the first to break Olympic history by becoming the first city to host both the Winter and Summer Olympics? Why has this title been snapped up by those 20 U.S cities? Clearly, you look down on Beijing's as a city of necessity, but if such a city is able to host both types of Olympics where those 20 U.S cities haven't yet, then I personally think that this is an achievement worth celebrating after all.
    10
  3102. Chinese government and workers built brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan) in Wuhan in 10 and 1600-bed hospital (Leishenshan) in Wuhan in 12 days, foreigners called them "containers". Yet here USA set up tentage for their "hospitals"
    10
  3103. Chinese politicians fulfill promises first, before getting elected. American politicians make promises first, before getting elected.
    10
  3104.  @cchannel7857  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According to Gregory Clark, all available eyewitness present inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    10
  3105. China sees win-win cooperation. U.S sees a zero sum game.
    10
  3106. I watch The Duran, George Galloway's The Mother of All Talk Shows, Richard Medhurst, The Dive with Jackson Hinkle, Glenn Greenwald, and anything by The Greyzone for news on the Ukraine crisis.
    10
  3107.  Gaylord Manlove  How is China falling? Under the communist party, China is predicted by IMF to be the only major economy to see positive growth in 2020. Source: China to be the only economy with positive growth in 2020, says IMF report news.cgtn.com/news/2020-10-13/World-GDP-to-drop-4-4-in-2020-IMF--UyNuoUIFlC/index.html
    10
  3108.  @ninjax5029  What about Philippines? The Philippine government even allowed Muslims to vote in a referendum on the proposed creation of an autonomous region in Southern Philippines. If this succeeds, there might be a new Islamic country in Southern Philippines. Source: Philippines: Muslims vote in referendum on autonomous region theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/21/philippines-muslims-vote-in-referendum-on-new-autonomous-region Why allow Muslims to divide your country and force you to give up your land to form their own country? As Muslims living in your country, they should be attempting to assimilate into your country, not breaking away parts of your country. China did the right thing by ensuring that Xinjiang remains part of China as it has always been for millennia.
    10
  3109. @Ben Benito Because Japan's economy was the world's 2nd largest from 1990 to 2005, that's why Japanese Yen became popular as a reserve currency. So with the rise of China's economy (expected to surpass the USA's someday in the foreseeable future) comes the potential rise of the Renminbi as a global reserve. Your logic basically supports my argument here.
    10
  3110. The Hong Kong extradition bill was proposed because of a certain incident. A Hong Kong guy named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, and stuff her body in her suitcase, before flying back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice for his crime, but Hong Kong has no extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to Hong Kong extradition laws. Do the HK protestors even know what they are protesting for? Have they read the bill and understood its contents in their entirety?
    10
  3111. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the USA is a threat to global peace and stability.
    10
  3112. Excellent point.
    10
  3113.  @hyc1266  The same thing applies to America's leadership. The US government has no overarching goal. The US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US short term leadership. Whereas China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership.
    10
  3114.  @derquantenalchemist5180  A "space elevator" would require materials capable of withstanding the tension created by the Earth's rotation. In 2018, Chinese scientists have developed a carbon nanotube fibre that they say is strong enough to be used to build a space elevator. Scientists say just 1 cubic cm of the carbon nanotube material won’t break under the weight of 160 elephants, or more than 800 tonnes. And that tiny piece of cable would weigh just 1.6 grams. The Tsinghua University research team patented the technology and published part of their research in the journal Nature Nanotechnology in 2018. ... Source: South China Morning Post
    10
  3115. Sensible, rational voices like Cyrus' are in short supply in today's world gone mad.
    10
  3116.  @cchannel7857  Who is this WuMao spokesperson who refused to give his name? Who was that one eyewitness? Who was that reporter? There's literally no way to verify the authenticity of your entire comment.
    10
  3117.  @FullPerspective  If China is not at war, then China is clearly at peace. You've failed to name a country that China is currently at war with, so it means China is at peace. China is not at war with India (neither is India at war with China). When did either country formally declared war on each other? In fact, there hasn't been any bullet fired across the Indian border since 1962/ "China has had killed and killed soldiers against India just a few years ago." If you're talking about the 17 Indian soldiers, they succumbed to the sub-zero temperatures and high altitude terrain in the Galwan Valley. The statement was made by the Indian Army.
    10
  3118. Some people in Hong Kong (but not all) are still suffering from the "colonial mentality" imposed by colonizers on the minds of the colonized. Even though Britain has physically decolonized from Hong Kong, the "decolonization of the mind" is still ongoing in Hong Kong.
    10
  3119.  @cchannel7857  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According to Gregory Clark, all available eyewitness present inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    10
  3120. When China rises, it raises the standing of Asians (e.g Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese, Thai, etc) When China is demonized, then the standing of Asians will suffer, whether Chinese or not.
    10
  3121. Yes. During the Ming Dynasty, Admiral Zheng He made seven voyages throughout South East Asia, South Asia and Africa, leading an armada of 300 ships. Some of these treasure ships were 5-7 times bigger than Christopher Columbus' Santa Maria flagship. But it was a peaceful merchant convoy meant for trading, not conquest like the European colonial powers that came later.
    10
  3122. @Progressive Republican During 19th century, British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want what the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China, and forced China to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to spread the addiction throughout rest of China, and Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. Even when Britain renounced its ownership over its former colonies, Hong Kong was not fully returned to China
    10
  3123. ​ @mikitadou  Whatever one's views towards Putin are, there's no denying that he's making Russia great again, through falling unemployment levels and delivering economic growth for Russia. No wonder why Putin enjoys political stability and support from the people of Russia. You can't say that for how people in the West feel about their leaders.
    10
  3124.  @martinraymond2120  "Surrendering the areas apparently under their control and abandoning the Nato bid for Ukraine." Ukraine stands no chance of retaking the four oblasts, (i.e Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson) as well as Crimea. These four regions have a high population of Russians living there, and these families were stranded in Ukraine when the USSR suddenly dissolved and Ukraine became independent. As I've said earlier, Crimea was historically part of Russia, before it was transferred to Ukraine to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's entry into the Soviet Union. So historically, these regions feel closer to Russia than they do to Ukraine. As for abandoning the Nato bid, it would certainly be in Ukraine's interest to act as a neutral buffer between Nato and Russia, maintaining equal relations between both sides. It shows that Russia is willing to allow Ukraine to exist so long as it doesn't take side against Russia by joining NATO. NATO has been expanding eastwards right up to Russia's doorstep, and thus represents an existential threat to Russia.
    10
  3125. 猴子不能说人语，所以就模仿人说话。
    10
  3126. Sadly, those bunch of politicians sowing discord in the world, were elected by the very people themselves, so in essence, the people themselves choose such politicians to create division.
    10
  3127. +577AllWell The video already shows Chinese government offering them resettlement villages with schools and access to amenities, but it is the Yi people's choice to carry their supplies up a mile-long ladder to their high altitude and isolated village instead.
    10
  3128. Russophobia is driven by the Red Scare (fear of communism) mindset. Sinophobia is driven by the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset.
    10
  3129. China: Cyberspace becomes Reality. U.S: Reality becomes Cyberspace.
    10
  3130. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and its "allies").
    10
  3131. Singapore citizens can't even protest against their own government themselves.
    10
  3132. As Kishore Mabubani said, the US-China trade war is basically America shooting themselves in the foot.
    10
  3133. China is at war with poverty. America is at war with the poor people themselves.
    10
  3134.  @bobbuilder7952  Modern China was built by the sweat, blood, tears and sacrifice of Chinese people and the government to turn China from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, into an economic juggernaut today, the world's factory (Made in China) a growing scientific and technological power, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, and China today has strong global presence, and influential player of world politics. And its all achieved under Chinese Communist Party leadership, so why should China adopt Western democracy then? Because Westerners says so?
    10
  3135.  @ricardoxavier827  Let's not forget that Russia is an European country, why should EU fear Russia and not allow them to join Nato? At one point, Putin had expressed interest in Russia joining Nato, but the application was rejected. So much trouble in Ukraine could have been avoided had Nato accepted Russia's membership.
    10
  3136. Yes, the North Korean defector Park Yeonmi claims North Koreans have to push the train when there's no electricity. I mean, why not just walk the distance, if the trains had no electricity?
    10
  3137.  @dennisshen4388  About China's leader for life, China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US short term leadership.
    10
  3138. Here's a Chinese analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family, which in turn open up a path to her ex-husband's doorstep. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    10
  3139. Pakistan doesn't want to become USA's next target, after seeing Americans invading Middle East during the Gulf war, the Iraq war, the Afghan war, the Libya war, etc.
    10
  3140. 30:32 They've destroyed 50% of Putin's army? Lol, that means the war is already half won?
    10
  3141. During Chinese Civil War, the communists were mostly poorly equipped, poorly trained peasants, much fewer in number than the Nationalists (Kuomintang). The KMT forces were wealthier, enjoyed better equipment, better training, better numbers, yet they lost control of the mainland and had to flee to Taiwan. This demonstrates gross incompetence on KMT's part and therefore, why should they rule China?
    10
  3142.  @petersinclair3997  Chairman Mao did far more good than harm. During the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949), China was fragmented into multiple smaller states ruled by various warlords, and even Tibet broke free of China during this period. It was thanks to Mao and the CPC who succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying the various provinces of China (including Tibet) and if not for this reunification, China would most likely remain a collection of smaller states, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong and unified country we are today. This feat alone is worth cementing Mao as the founder of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳.
    10
  3143. Jai Hind ! 🇮🇳
    10
  3144.  @שלמהאזולאי-נ2ש  Tibet has already been freed from the Dalai Lama
    10
  3145.  @adoreslaurel  Sri Lanka owes 81% of its external debt to US and European financial institutions and Western allies Japan and India. China owns just 10%, so how is China responsible for Sri Lanka's debt trap? As of 2021, a staggering 81% of Sri Lanka’s foreign debt was owned by U.S. and European financial institutions, as well as Western allies Japan and India. This pales in comparison to the mere 10% owed to Beijing. .. Source: Real debt trap: Sri Lanka owes vast majority to West, not China
    10
  3146. President Xi talking to Zelenskyy over the phone, indicates that China is committed to finding a peaceful resolution to the Ukraine conflict.
    10
  3147.  @greek42069  If he was paid by the CPC, then why does Cyrus include sponsors in his videos?
    10
  3148.  @neil6958  You said: "Also, does sentimentality have a price!?" She did name her price of 4 flats and 2 million yuan, so she clearly willing to accept such an outrageous offer as compensation, in place of so-called sentimentality. Also, the fact remains that the Communist Party of China just leave her be, and just modified the bridge to go around her house instead of forcing her to leave her home.
    10
  3149.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "神州 Shenzhou China should be focusing to control spreading the virus." That's precisely what China is doing; locking down cities to curb the spread of the coronavirus. Whereas in the USA, the U.S government is letting the coronavirus roam free, infecting people, causing surge in nursing homes and possibly leading to their healthcare system becoming overwhelmed as a result.
    10
  3150.  @MarkYeung1  The U.S. has now surpassed 60 million Covid-19 cases since the pandemic began as the country’s health care system struggles to cope with the surging omicron variant. China is trying to avoid this scenario in the USA, by initiating lockdown to curb the spread of Covid-19 in our country, whereas the USA is seemingly doing nothing and giving the virus free rein in their country.
    10
  3151. China has world's longest range ICBM, the DF-41, with operational range of 13,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the US's LGM-30 Minuteman's range of 13,000 km. How will the mountain range pose a barrier to Chinese forces, when Chinese missiles can literally fly over and beyond the Himalayas?
    10
  3152. American Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years max, because of presidential term limits, so their presidents are only interested in making short-term plans, and are incapable of making long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more for America's future. Whereas China has prepared 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans to map out China's direction and future in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. Because the communist party is expected to remain in power for the long-term, they'll be able to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the years to come.
    10
  3153. ​ @Aikúsoul  "US has been supporting Taiwan for a hundred plus years" The U.S has been supporting the Nationalist Kuomintang since the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period. But corruption was rampant within the KMT, and they pocketed some $750,000,000 in U.S aid. So much such that even U.S President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption, and wrote that the wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves".
    10
  3154. Agreed. If someone hasn't physically visited a country and his/her eyes haven't witness the truth here in China, why let their mouth speak words, as though it is the truth?
    10
  3155. Macron has a history of making controversial statements, but ultimately capitulating to whatever the US tells him to do.
    10
  3156. It's sad that such a beautiful country often gets overshadowed by the bird that shares the same name. No wonder why the country has officially changed its name to Turkiye, which is the name of the country in their own language.
    10
  3157.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "Chinese debt is quite the opposite. It is free-for-all, if it is misappropriated by corrupt officials, is of no concern to the Chinese regime." Chinese loans actually result in actual tangible infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, ports, airports in Sri Lanka, whereas you can't really say the same for the other 90% of lenders. You said: "So, those 10% were basically wasted - in Sri Lanka even the part that was actually used for a real investment was in a white elephant with no value for Sri Lanka but of great strategic importance for China's imperialist plans." Could you list some examples of this "white elephants" investments that you are referring to? You said: "Those 10% of Chinese money was that extra water that made the glass overflow... and left Sri Lanka bankrupt." Sri Lanka went bankrupt because of 90% its debt being held by the West/Japan/India, etc, how is just 10% by China responsible? When a glass overflow, you blame the 10% extra water, instead of the existing 90% water already inside the glass? You said: "Epilogue: the Sri Lanka president fled the country. Chinese greatness at its best." Seems like all you want to do is pin the blame on China that's all, regardless of what the actual facts on the ground tell you.
    10
  3158.  @crusoerob8550  You said: "We know that you are also suffering under this govt" What makes you say that? Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India in the past, but fast forward till today, and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory ("i.e Made-in-China") having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western MSM constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    10
  3159.  @fcl3294  Liu Xiaobo (in my opinion) is a Chinese that dislike his own race and culture, and is in favor of promoting Western Imperialism over the world. In a 1988 interview with Hong Kong's Liberation Monthly (now known as Open Magazine), Liu said "modernization means wholesale westernization, choosing a human life is choosing a Western way of life.... Westernization is not a choice of a nation, but a choice for the human race.
    10
  3160. @minionzatwork The difference is that a clown would never be afforded the opportunity to rise to the top of China's govt.
    10
  3161. World events offer China the opportunity to invite people to visit China as well as expose China more to the world. It's countries like the USA that's trying to undermine the Beijing Winter Olympics 2022 by threatening to boycott it.
    10
  3162. Lol, Cyrus isn't even betting anything, he's just stating that Chinese aren't the biggest owners of American farmlands, that title belongs to Canadians.
    10
  3163. +randomguy8196 I said USA is unreliable since it wouldn't go to war for ROC. That means if China does reclaim ROC, then USA won't rush to Taiwan's defense that's all. Therefore the people of Taiwan shouldn't be misled into thinking USA is dependable ally.
    10
  3164. Taiwan politics actually quite complex so not easy to know the true people's views. They are COLOR coded, with BLUE (like Kuomintang KMT) representing people in favor of eventual unification with the mainland, and GREEN (like Democratic Progressive Party DPP) representing people in favor of independence. Because of nature of democracy, political parties can gain/lose power very suddenly and quickly, and it can appear like the government is flipping on its own decisions, due to poll results.
    10
  3165. According to data from Angus Maddison, from the year 1 - 1800 AD, China's GDP made up around 25% of the world's total GDP. It was in the 20th century that China's GDP fallen behind the West and USA GDP became dominant. Now it looks as though China is gradually returning to its historical status as a powerhouse in the 21st century.
    10
  3166. "America is the only major developed society where the average income of the bottom 50 percent has gone down over a 30-year period." - Kishore Mabubani
    10
  3167. India has better Airforce? The Indian Air Force lost half of its MiG fighter jets in deadly crashes. which have led to the deaths of 171 pilots, 39 civilians and 8 persons from other services, over the last 40 years.. Because of this, the MiG is often nicknamed "Flying Coffins". Here is a list of known MiG crashes in IAF. Jul 6, 2017: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed in Jodhpur’s Balesar. Sep 10, 2016: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed in Barmer district of Rajasthan Jun 13, 2016: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed in Jodhpur, Rajasthan. Aug 24, 2015: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed near a village in Budgam district. May 8, 2015: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed in West Bengal’s Tantipara area. Jan 31, 2015: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed west of Jamnagar city.. May 27, 2014: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed in Bijbehara area of Anantnag district in Kashmir. Nov 8, 2013: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed near Jamnagar. Jul 15, 2013: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed at Uttarlai airbase in Rajasthan’s Barmer district. Even this new year in Jan 3, 2018, A MiG 29K of Indian Navy crashed at Goa Airport.
    10
  3168.  @MarkYeung1  If the 2 companies merge, it means that Chinese government will now have control over Tik Tok (instead of having separate servers for overseas clients) and this will give the US Congress ever more reason to ban this app, if those two companies merge.
    10
  3169. Agreed. In addition, some people in developing countries also suffer from a "colonial mentality", worshiping Anglo-Saxon culture while harboring a disdain for any "non-white" culture (including their own). Decolonization of the mind is needed to heal the mental damage inflicted by the colonizer on the minds of the colonised. Only then can people truly be free of their colonial history.
    10
  3170. They maintain eye contact and aren't shy or looking away from the camera, so why do you still think that it's fake?
    10
  3171. Agreed. What's so terrible about Ukraine being neutral? Switzerland is neutral and not a part of the European Union or NATO, yet Switzerland hasn't suffered because of it's neutrality, it has benefited immensely. Wouldn't Ukraine want to be neutral like Switzerland?
    10
  3172.  @adamperdue3178  "Your definition might be a nice statement but it's not an actual definition of a democracy." Right at the beginning I wrote: "There are multiple ways to define democracy." The definition I've chosen is a government of the people, by the people, for the people._The definition you've chosen is _"procedural democracy", meaning that as long as a country follows the proper democratic procedures, they are considered a democracy. But again, just running through the steps doesn't necessarily mean that the "people's will" are being carried out, as I'm sure you're aware of in the United State's case. You said: "China is not a Democracy by any stretch of the imagination" Could you elaborate why exactly? It just appears that you ranted on about how China isn't a democracy, without bothering to list the reasons why you think so. You said: "(In fact I'd argue that in the case of the U.S. a non-insignificant portion of the problem is the fact that the government is beholden to the public)." How is the U.S government beholden to the public? For example, Joe Biden recently approved $40 billion in aid to Ukraine, while Americans have problems with healthcare, inflation, rising food and fuel prices, shortage of baby formula. Do Americans really want to send $40 billion to Ukraine? Is the U.S government really carrying out the people's desires?
    10
  3173. To see the past 10 years of Chinese history, visit Shanghai. To see the past 100 years of Chinese history, visit Beijing. To see the past 1000 years of Chinese history, visit Xi'an. To see the future, visit Shenzhen.
    10
  3174.  @otofoto  Russia has requested for an investigation into the events in Bucca, but the UN Security Council has rejected Russia's request.
    10
  3175. Prof Martin Jacques and Prof Zhang Weiwei are both intellectuals who also share a deep understanding of Chinese culture, just like her.
    10
  3176.  @bartonlee3594  Is simple politeness too much of ask of Western MSM journalists?
    10
  3177. Yes, this Chinese proverb “Pointing to a deer and saying it’s a horse” (指鹿曰馬) has even influenced the Japanese word for "fool" which is baka (馬鹿), basically the characters for horse 馬 and deer 鹿.
    10
  3178. Contrary to popular belief, calling someone a "son of a bi**h" isn't really an ad hominem attack, that's a direct verbal insult. An example of a fallacious ad hominem attack would be to attack someone's credentials, like pointing out how someone is a school dropout, or lacks experience in journalism, or something else to that effect.
    10
  3179.  @danielcockerill3761  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    10
  3180.  @happyzahn8031  "China with all the homeless..." Today China is a country of homeowners with more than 90% of households owning homes (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations (Huang et al., 2020). Whereas the rate of homeownership in the U.S has dropped to the lowest point since 1965 (63% in 2017) (US Census Bureau, 2018). ... Source: National Library of Medicine
    10
  3181. There's even a Chinese joke about Facebook: the English name itself sounds like Fēisǐ bùkě (非死不可) which in Mandarin, translates to "Must Die!" or "Have to Die!"
    10
  3182.  @kasikwagoma6740  Those corporations control the government in the U.S, whereas in China, it's the opposite and our government controls the corporations.
    10
  3183. ​ @suikikin511 According to FOCAC (Forum for China-Africa Cooperation) Beijing has canceled interest-free loan debts due to mature at the end of 2020 for 15 African countries. Cancellations announced in Botswana, Burundi, Rwanda, Cameroon, the DRC, the ROC, and Mozambique total at least $113.8 million.
    10
  3184. China is also about poverty alleviation and improving the lives of the people. For example, China's highspeed railway connecting Eastern China to Western China runs at a loss, in order to keep train fares affordable for commuters.
    10
  3185. Chess might be too advanced for America. Maybe they are playing Snakes & Ladders instead?
    10
  3186.  @mikeo7317  Look at Xinjiang under China and its actually much more prosperous and developed than its Islamic neighboring like Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, etc. Even Tibet under China is doing better off than its Buddhist neighbors like Nepal and Bhutan.
    10
  3187. Those Filipinos bragging about helping the US in Korea and Vietnam, probably haven't heard of how Philippines became an American colony after the American-Philippines war, in which a quarter million of Filipino civilians died.
    10
  3188. Indeed. Yablunska Street was already under Russian control at that time, it makes no sense for Russian forces to shell territory that they already control, so much such that mortar impacts appeared on satellite images. Most probably the shelling was by Ukrainian forces attacking the street.
    10
  3189. @Sheriff Lobo Don't you read English? The OP clearly mentioned "imported" Australian veggies in his comment, he never said anything about the price of vegetables in Australia.
    10
  3190.  @klhilde  Mao did not kill those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine, which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in a poor harvest. Even Mao Zedong can't possibly control the weather now isn't it? And if not for Mao, China today would still be divided and fighting among ourselves, because the previous Republic of China (1912-1949) failed to unify China, even after 37 years. Mao Zedong is the reason why China is unified today after he proclaimed People's Republic of China in 1949. Without a Chinese Communist Party, China today would be fragmented into Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, Northern China, Southern China, Hainan Islands, etc, instead of the strong unified country we are today. So that's the "imagination" of what China could have been today, if there had never been a CCP. A fragmented, divided country.
    10
  3191.  Shivankar Pandey  You Indians have so called "free" media but it only stirs up nationalism among Indians then how does that solve the problem? Narendra Modi is under more and more pressure to do something to appease Indians so how is that good for India, you tell me? You think free media is somehow better?
    10
  3192.  @COYS-o2i  Recently, Shenzhen had an outbreak (Omicron variant too) but they've managed to lower the number of cases after lockdown, and had reopened. It just goes to show that zero Covid policy is not impossible, as long as it's handled well.
    10
  3193. US-China relations were cordial in the Nixon era, but it has since deteriorated to quite possibly their worst in recent years.
    10
  3194. During WW2, the Communist army was much smaller compared to the Nationalist army, so the communists resort to tactics suitable for smaller numbers against a bigger opponent (such as guerrilla warfare). And the Nationalists were heavily corrupt, collecting money from USA. US President Harry Truman once remarked that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves," having taken $750 million in US aid.
    10
  3195.  Akimbo Soulassassin  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    10
  3196. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the U.S is a threat to global peace and stability.
    10
  3197.  @AmbietsRato  You said: "Even a minor incident in a NATO country demands a collective response." But currently, Ukraine is NOT a Nato member yet why are they sending military aid to Ukraine? They are under no obligation to help Ukraine since its not a member.
    10
  3198.  @JaneDoe19635  Agreed. Yet they lured Ukraine with false promises, which provided the motivation for Zelenskyy to soldier on at his country's expense.
    10
  3199.  @norbertdosa2016  Again, Ukraine is not a democracy. According to Freedom House (a nonpartisan think tank that ranks democracies) Ukraine has been labeled a transitional or hybrid regime. The Economist Intelligence Unit, also pegged Ukraine as a “hybrid regime.” Yet what makes you think Ukraine is a democracy?
    10
  3200.  @fazotakeiteasy  Because of U.S sanctions, Russia cannot buy U.S tires, so that's why they are buying Chinese tires. And what makes you think Russians are unable to beat Ukraine on the battlefield? How much territory has Ukraine lost?
    10
  3201. ‪Look at what India did‬: ‪1947 annex Kashmir ‬ ‪1949 annex Manipur ‬ ‪1949 annex Tripura ‬ ‪1951 hitting south Tibet ‬ ‪1954 annex Nagaland ‬ ‪1961 annex Goa‬ ‪1962 annex karapani of Nepal‬ ‪1962 attack China‬ ‪1971 annex Turtuk of Pakistan ‬ ‪1972 annex Tin Bigha of Bangladesh‬ 1975 attack and annex Sikkim 1983 attack Mauritius ‬ ‪1987 invade Sri Lanka ‬ ‪1990 attack Bhutan ‬ ‪2006 annex Dooars of Bhutan ‬ ‪2013 annex Moreh of Burma ‬ ‪2017 attack China ‬ ‪2017 attack Bhutan ‬ ‪2018 invade Maldives‬
    10
  3202. The American government still heavily controlled by fossil fuel companies, like Rex Tillerson, former CEO of ExxonMobil, so that's why they constant fight wars in Middle East like Iraq and Afghanistan to control the oil there. Also, President Trump withdrew from Paris agreement on climate change, so that USA can burn more fossil fuels. Its the complete reversal here.
    10
  3203.  @MarkYeung1  Chairman Mao is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where even the previous Kuomintang administration failed to achieve for 37 years during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949). If not for Mao Zedong, China today would most likely still be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong and united civilization it is today.
    10
  3204. @comment sense As far as I know, Chinese are generally considered to be among the most intelligent and diligent people, with rich cultures and long histories. Many stereotypical Chinese jobs have an element of hard work to them, like farmers, rickshaw drivers, labourers (coolies), chefs (of Chinese restaurants), laundromat workers, nail salon workers, etc. Most Chinese tend to study hard and not fool around in school, graduating to become doctors, dentists, lawyers, scientists, engineers, researchers, and so on. There is literally no job too low or too high that Chinese aren't willing to do, or qualified to do. (Of course, this is all just stereotypes, but there must be an kernel of truth for it to become a stereotype in the first place)
    10
  3205. @comment sense Why are you resorting to shouting? Did you check out the videos on YT of Westerners boiling lobsters alive? Animals that are considered livestock and prepared a certain way, then who are you to impose your beliefs onto other culture's perception of food?
    10
  3206. @comment sense Pigs are actually shown to be more intelligent than Dogs, yet Pigs are regarded as livestock compared to Dogs. Again, who are you to impose your beliefs regarding food and livestock onto other culture's perception of food? For example, Hindus view the Cow as a sacred animal, so should the whole world stop slaughtering cows just because of Hindu beliefs?
    10
  3207. Agreed. Putin has stated that Russia has no plans to occupy Ukraine. Putin also never said Ukrainians are ethnically Russians, he said that Ukrainians and Russians (and Belorussians) were "one people" that share a common heritage, known as Kievan Rus.
    10
  3208. These Uighur kids are Chinese citizens, receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin, Chinese history and that their motherland is People's Republic of China. Just like Hawaiian kids are American citizens, being taught English, American history and that their motherland is United States of America.
    10
  3209.  @basedbro2578  Looks like you can't refute my points, so instead you resort to labelling me as wumao, just because my views happen to differ from yours? Why not attack my points instead of attacking me personally?
    10
  3210.  @thitran3080  Agreed. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiment in the West against Russia and China respectively. And it's having the effect of pushing both countries closer together than we've ever been.
    10
  3211. China is patient. If President Xi thinks President Trump will walk on him, just wait for Trump to step down as president, then just renegotiate for more favorable deals with the next US President. Simple as that. President Trump is limited by his term limits whereas President Xi abolished the term limits, so he can always establish new relations with the next POTUS.
    10
  3212. I would hazard a guess that many Chinese actually understand America better than many Americans understand China.
    10
  3213. Here's the Chinese way to explain the Ukraine/Russia war in the form of a family drama to help clear up confusion about the situation: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), taking several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and generously left her with a lot of family property as well as paying off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (i.e NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain degree, (but) she was enraptured with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and someday dreams of marrying into the NATO family, and of surrounding and constricting her ex-husband. The village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the NATO family, because she was high-maintenance and loved to splurge money. Even his many wives did not want her into the family, yet they still encouraged her to join the family. In truth, the village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex husband and wife conflict, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift a finger and partake in the actual fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would have to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this helps clear up any confusion in the Ukraine/Russian war and puts it on a more relatable level.
    10
  3214.  @Zeetana1  Many Iranians mourned the loss of General Soleimani , so how is that "good riddance" in your eyes? Can you imagine the same thing happening instead to a beloved U.S General (although I can't think of one)?
    10
  3215.  @joshlewis575  Chairman Mao is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided homeland, where the previous Kuomintang administration failed to do so for 37 years under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949). If not for Mao Zedong, China today would most likely continue to be a weak and divided nation, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong and united civilization we are today.
    10
  3216. Joe probably isn't familiar with the original Chinese proverb 搬起石头砸自己的脚.
    10
  3217.  @SwedeenXBL  You said: "Are you acting like you have a reading disability or do you actually have one?" You can't answer the question so you resort to hurling personal insults against me? You've made it clear that you "wouldn't count Hrabove as Ukrainian territory" then why can't you admit that you would consider Crimea as Russian territory?
    10
  3218.  @SwedeenXBL  You said: "I'm gonna say something about Crimea and Donbas, The Budapest Memorandum. That's all I need to say on that issue." The 2014 Crimean Referendum had revealed that an overwhelming majority (96.77%) of Crimeans voted to join the Russian Federation. You said: "Genocide? To this day there is 0 evidence that a genocide/ethnic cleansing was happening in the Donbas" United Nations figures have revealed that around 14 000 have been killed in Donbas since 2014. According to UN figures, from 2018 to 2021, 81.4% of civilian casualties in the Donbas war came in rebel-held territory. You said: "Oh and btw, this war would have been over, not even started, if Russia hadn’t started this war." This war wouldn't even have started had Ukraine agreed to remain neutral, and not applied to join expansionist NATO. Russia have been voicing concerns over NATO's expansion towards Russia's doorstep, but Russia's words have fallen on deaf ears in the West. That's why people like you don't even know Russia's concerns, and just seem to think Putin woke up one day and decided to go to war.
    10
  3219.  @alenluo  If the Communist government truly kept the novel coronavirus in secrecy then why'd did China even report the novel coronavirus to the World Health Organization on 31 Dec 2019 at all? Why did China work hard to identify the virus strain and even sequence the coronavirus genome in record time and shared this information with WHO if they were trying to keep the novel coronavirus a secret you tell me?
    10
  3220. @Teringventje China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today. Chinese film can take place in any time period, from ancient Chinese period drama to modern times to furistic science fiction.
    10
  3221. @DolphinsWIthIgloos "神州 Shenzhou Russian tanks are having their turrets popped off like bottle caps." NATO Javelin missiles are proving to be ineffective against Russian tanks, the rocket infantry are having difficulty even getting in range to launch their missiles. And Russia's arsenal also includes hypersonic missiles such as Kinzal (Dagger) that can fly at more than 10x the speed of sound and virtually impossible for NATO to intercept. It flies so fast that a plasma-bubble forms around the warhead, effectively absorbing radar and masking it's rapid approach.
    10
  3222. The Philippines intentionally grounded a vessel (the Sierra Madre) onto the Second Thomas Shoal. China had offered to repair the grounded vessel and get it back into the ocean, but Philippines refused China's aid. In 1999, Philippine president Joseph Estrada promised that the vessel would be towed away. In 2014, the Chinese government asked the Philippines to remove the grounded ship. In 2017, China and the Philippines established a gentlemen's agreement that the status quo be maintained for the South China Sea. Under the status quo agreement, no construction materials are allowed to fortify the Sierra Madre. However, the Philippines violated the agreement and started sending construction materials to repair the rusting vessel.
    10
  3223. There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, merely detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    10
  3224. Depleted Ukrainian munitions.
    10
  3225. China was carved up like a pie and our territories served to 8 invading imperialists. Even today, the USA is trying to separate Xinjiang, Tibet, Hong Kong, Taiwan from the rest of mainland China.
    10
  3226. Agreed. The silence on Seymour Hersh's Nord Stream report in the West is deafening.
    10
  3227. The government always stated that India is welcome to participate in the Belt and Road Initiative. But New Delhi clearly rejected the offer and Beijing respects this decision.
    10
  3228. China's supercomputer Tianhe-1 (天河-1) found that the lungs of a young American vaper hospitalized for "mysterious pneumonia" last summer could be exhibiting Covid-19 symptoms. scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3079046/chinese-supercomputer-and-american-doctors-clash-over-ai
    10
  3229.  @GabrielEddy  你知道月光来自太阳吗？其实月球本身并不发光，反而月球是靠太阳的反射光反射到地球的。
    10
  3230.  @jtf873  Which other country in the world is willing to tolerate multiple political systems existing within its borders apart from China? The One Country Two Systems policy is like as though North Korea and South Korea agree to reunify as a single country, Korea, but allowing both sides to keep their respective governments. Nowhere in the world is this sort of arrangement tolerated, except in China.
    10
  3231.  @jtf873  Chairman Mao is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed to achieve during Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1911-1949) for 37 years. If not for Mao, China today would still be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves instead of the strong and unified country we are today.
    10
  3232.  @intothewrx  How did mainland China break the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy in Hong Kong? Hong Kong clearly have their own government separate from the mainland. Previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held in Hong Kong while it was a British colony. Only during the period of the 1997 handover that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy, where they have none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    10
  3233. Ren Zhengfei has certainly been through a lot, given that his daughter Meng Wanzhou had been detained by Canadian authorities for nearly 3 years.
    10
  3234. +Rick Sanchez There's a difference between weapons-grade nuclear materials and non-weapons-grade nuclear material. You're Rick Sanchez, genius mad scientist yet you don't know?
    10
  3235. Some Japanese textbooks about the Japanese war still continue to omit the Rape of Nanjing, and depict "comfort" women as well-paid government prostitutes. South Korean comfort women (now in their 80s-90s) still protest outside Japanese embassy. Japan also enshrined Class-A war criminals into Yasukuni shrine, so how is this considered an apology? Do Germans enshrine Hitler and Nazi party and worship them?
    10
  3236. It's baffling how Russia is a part of Europe, yet not allowed into NATO. While the United States locate across the Pacific Ocean, is a NATO member.
    10
  3237. Nathan Rich aptly crowns Gordon Chang as China's saddest clown. Video: China's Saddest Clown youtu.be/WVEV9kD_r1Q
    10
  3238.  @fl338  According to the opinion polls conducted in Taiwan, only a small minority (5.6%) want independence and that the vast majority (87%) of the people polled want to maintain the status quo. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China, and any move to declare independence would be seen as altering the status quo. An outcome that the majority of people in Taiwan polled do not support.
    10
  3239.  @fl338  I did not change the topic, you just said Free Hong Kong, so I replied that Hong Kong has been freed from the Hong Kong rioters.
    10
  3240.  @autodidact537  Because USA's immigration laws are too loose, as long as an immigrant has family member or relative who is American citizens, then they are themselves eligible to apply for US citizenship. That's why many Mexicans/Hispanics, Muslims and Asians are marrying Americans for citizenship, so they can import their whole families over and displace the Caucasian American population and lead to social problems. Whereas China is already the world's most populous country and its possible that there's not enough food, schools and jobs for everyone in China, so we don't really need more immigrants. China impose strict immigration laws, allowing only the bare minimum number of immigrants and no more than absolutely necessary. Priority citizenship is given to immigrants with something towards offer to China, like doctors, lawyers, scientists, businessmen, researchers, technopreneurs, and so on. Lower priority citizenship is given to refugees, deadbeats, drug addicts, dissidents, drunkards, and other such people. Other countries are always welcome to pick up these immigrants, but keep them out of China please.
    10
  3241. Like taking a knife to a gunfight, Canada is taking infantry and snipers into a mechanized fight against Russian tanks and artillery.
    10
  3242.  @ladodah  Chinese literally live in China, what makes you claim Chinese are ignorant of anything bad in China, when we live here and experience China for ourselves? Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself? Even many expats that visit China have their initial negative impressions of China shattered, just search YouTube for "First Impressions China" to see what I mean.
    10
  3243. Traditional Confucian teachings tells us that the elderly are valuable members of society and that the young should do everything to keep our elderly alive, even if it comes at an economic cost. Loss of income due to lockdowns is regrettable yes, but money loss can always be earned back later. But once those elderly lose their lives to Covid, then no amount of money can buy back lives that have been lost.
    10
  3244.  @petehagen8638  You said: "America has never threatened to use nuclear weapons against China." America is the only country in the world to have employed nuclear weapons against another country (Japan). In 1964, China signed a No-First-Use policy regarding nuclear weapons, meaning that China will not preemptively launch a nuclear strike onto another country, unless we are ourselves attacked with nukes. The USA has refused to adopt a no first use policy, meaning that they can preemptively nuke any country without being provoked.
    10
  3245.  @pizzadoe7922  Still, the stakes are higher for a Chinese Ambassador to lose his cool, compared to a Western journalist to lose her cool (it's almost a requirement for Western media sensationalism nowadays). Had the Chinese ambassador stooped to her level, it would offer her the opportunity to label him a Chinese "Wolf Warrior" diplomat, just because his words happen to be stronger.
    10
  3246.  @ColoniaMurder20  The aborigine people in Taiwan were descended from farmers from mainland China that arrived on the island some 5,000 years ago. Around 5,000 years ago, farmers from the southeast Chinese coast settled on the island. These people are believed to have been speakers of Austronesian languages, which dispersed from Taiwan across the islands of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The current Taiwanese aborigines are believed to be their descendants. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan)
    10
  3247. Sounds like you're describing the "colonial mentality" that continues to affect many Filipinos today. Colonial mentality is defined as the perception of ethnic and cultural inferiority as a result of colonization. It is the continued worshipping of Anglo Saxon culture while harboring a disdain for any "non-white" culture, including their own.
    10
  3248. Taiwan is only able to stubbornly hold out against reunification because of perceived American backing. But reunification is inevitable because it's no secret today that the United States is in decline and China is rising. Time is on China's side and as long as peace prevails, the USA will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise, and when that happens, Taiwan's backing is gone and they will have to accept reunification with the mainland.
    10
  3249.  @ericcartmann  Look at Chinese culture, and we value hard work, being studious in school and industrious at work, so why can't Chinese government impart some of these positive virtues to Uighurs? The Uighurs weren't even Muslims in the first place, and Xinjiang was part of China long before the Islamic invaders conquered the region and converted the natives to Islam. Why can't Chinese government undo the damage that radicalism done to Uighurs?
    10
  3250. They don't call Australia as US's deputy sheriff in Asia for no reason.
    10
  3251.  @dziku2222  You're claiming that China is "short-sighted" but the Chinese government has produced 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, etc, to map out China's direction in the future. Our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050.
    10
  3252. Vietnamese PM Pham Van Dong had acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were Chinese territory in a 1958 diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." ... (Source: Wikipedia: File:1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai)
    10
  3253. HAMAS is behaving like the inmate that decided to make a daring prison break from the open air concentration camp that is Gaza.
    10
  3254.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  "神州 Shenzhou the same type research as conducted by the bases in the Spratly Islands." You're talking about the Vietnamese bases they built in the Spratly Islands? Vietnam has slowly added buildings on some of its 10 major islets in the South China Sea, and yet receives very little international criticism for their artificial island construction.
    10
  3255.  @DarkwearGT  Many Singapore Chinese have relatives living in mainland China, that they visit during Spring Festival (Chinese New Year) Even many families in Taiwan still have relatives living in the mainland.
    10
  3256.  @uselesshero.official  India was actually known as Tianzhu (天竺 Heavenly Place) in ancient China.
    10
  3257. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, rather than the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and its allies).
    10
  3258. Here's Americans on the street being presented a World Map and asked: "Can You Name a Country? Any Country?" youtu.be/kRh1zXFKC_o
    10
  3259. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    10
  3260.  @larrywongthupeng201  Nobel prize winner is very subjective. For example, Chinese agronomist Yuan Longping (袁隆平) is known as the "Father of Hybrid Rice" for his contributions in creating Hybrid rice to feed populations. The increase in grain production can feed 70 million people yet Yuan wasn't even nominated for the Nobel prize.
    10
  3261. Netanyahu wasn't even popular before Oct 7.
    10
  3262. Deren Bong China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7%arable land. Chinese traded luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder and porcelain (precious china) that were in high demand by the other nations.
    10
  3263.  @robocophero5317  Seems like you just can't stand seeing China succeed.
    10
  3264.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Did you know that 2 million Hong Kong people protested without violence?" Where did you get your figure of 2 million? The Hong Kong Police reported about only 200-300 thousand protestors during the Hong Kong protests, so where did you get your figure of 2 million protestors?
    10
  3265. Here's the Chinese analogy to explain the Ukraine/Russia war in the form of a family drama to help clear up confusion about the situation: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), taking several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and generously left her with a lot of family property as well as paying off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (i.e NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain degree, (but) she was enraptured with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and someday dreams of marrying into the NATO family, and of surrounding and constricting her ex-husband. The village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the NATO family, because she was high-maintenance and loved to splurge money. Even his many wives did not want her into the family, yet they still encouraged her to join the family. In truth, the village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex husband and wife conflict, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift a finger and partake in the actual fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would have to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this helps clear up any confusion in the Ukraine/Russian war and puts it on a more relatable level.
    10
  3266. Don't poke the Russian bear either.
    10
  3267. Every Chinese person who knows his home country's history, knows of Zheng He's treasure voyages.
    10
  3268. A Chinese company? Did you watch till 14:20 of the video? 60% of TikTok is owned by US and international investors. 20% is owned by the company's founders and 20% is owned by TikTok employees (including 7,000 US citizens)
    10
  3269.  @ShuCarolina  You said: "China would had long ago became a modernized and developed country if China was not under authoritarian rule." If that's the case, then why isn't the worlds' largest democracy (and the 2nd most populous country after China) India a modernized and developed country? The Republic of India 🇮🇳 was founded in 1947, while the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 was founded 2 years later in 1949, and yet China has surpassed India in many sectors.
    10
  3270.  @MarkYeung1  China has nearly 200 million believers and more than 380,000 clerical personnel. There are 222,000 Buddhist clerical personnel and over 40,000 Taoist clerical personnel. There are 20 million Muslims in China with about 57,000 clerical personnel. Catholicism and Protestantism have 6 million and 38 million followers, with 8,000 and 57,000 clerical personnel respectively. There are about 144,000 places of worship registered for religious activities in China: -33,500 Buddhist temples (including 28,000 Han Buddhist temples, 3,800 Tibetan Buddhist lamaseries, and 1,700 Theravada Buddhist temples) -9,000 Taoist temples. -35,000 Mosques. -6,000 Catholic churches and 60,000 Protestant churches. There are approximately 5,500 religious groups in China, including seven national organizations which are Buddhist Association of China, Chinese Taoist Association, China Islamic Association, Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association, Bishops' Conference of Catholic Church in China, National Committee of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement of the Protestant Churches in China, and China Christian Council.
    10
  3271.  @MarkYeung1  What are those underground churches so afraid of? As long as Chinese Christians register themselves with the proper authorities, then the government will let them practice their religion in peace. But someone want's others to adhere to his/her syncretic version of Christianity, then the government will not permit their activities to bring harm to others or to the state. Because in China, the government has a duty to protect the ordinary citizens and the nation.
    10
  3272. Many Chinese hold optimistic attitudes and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Americans are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    10
  3273.  @chrishamlin5863  You live in Vietnam right? Do Vietnamese people remember China helping Vietnam fight for independence from France? During the First Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons (ranging from artillery guns to rifles and machine-guns), ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help Vietnam fight for independence from France.
    10
  3274.  @Jv19979  Ukraine is supporting the ultra-nationalist neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion, that's carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Luhansk and Donetsk. Over the last 8 years, over 13,000 people have been killed in the Donbas region by shelling (by both sides) of which 80% of civilians killed were in Donbas. Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that began since the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukovych by USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine.
    10
  3275. Like China, India actually contributed much to greening the Earth by reforestation. Source: India plants 220 million trees in a single day cbsnews.com/news/climate-change-india-plants-220-million-trees-in-a-single-day-to-save-the-planet/
    10
  3276.  @MarkYeung1  Ukraine is supporting the ultra-nationalist, neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion that's carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Luhansk and Donetsk. Over the last 8 years, over 13,000 people have been killed in the Donbas region by shelling (by both sides). Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that began since the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukovych by USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine.
    10
  3277.  @fl338  Well not just China alone, but also India (self-declared world's largest democracy) has also similarly abstained from voting against Russia in the UN General Assembly, as has Pakistan and some other countries in the minority. But if you combine the populations of the minority countries that either abstained or voted in support of Russia, including China, India, Pakistan, and African and South American countries, it accounts for more than half of the world's population. And regarding Chernobyl, Russian forces have negotiated with Ukrainian troops defending the nuclear power plant and have reached an agreement those troops. There hasn't been any reports of a surge in nuclear contamination in Chernobyl by IAEA. And about the news of Zaporizhzhia nuclear reactor catching fire, it turns out that it was a facility outside the nuclear reactor that caught fire, not the actual nuclear reactor itself. As for the ICJ, Russia had formally justified the attack in a letter to the UN secretary general on grounds of self-defence, not on genocide. So the whole premise of the ICJ ruling based on genocide is groundless, and that ICJ does not have jurisdiction over the matter since Russia is acting in the interests of self-defense, not genocide. Lastly, regarding Ukrainian biolabs, Victoria Nuland has testified in court that Ukraine has "biological research facilities". If those facilities were supposedly for peaceful, civilian purposes, then why is Nuland so concerned about the data supposedly "falling into the hands" of Russians? You said: "Only Russia and China accepted the Russian allegations." India has also expressed concern over the allegations of biological activities in Ukraine.
    10
  3278. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a bleak outlook of the future.
    10
  3279. forbidmyname Since when is Facebook, Google and YouTube banned in China? Nobody comes to arrest you if you are using Facebook, YouTube or Google in China.
    10
  3280.  @John2r1  Those native Aboriginal people in Taiwan are descended from ancestors that arrived on the island from mainland China some 5,000 years ago. Around 5,000 years ago, farmers from the southeast Chinese coast settled on the island. These people are believed to have been speakers of Austronesian languages, which dispersed from Taiwan across the islands of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The current Taiwanese aborigines are believed to be their descendants. Source: Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan
    10
  3281. For information regarding Russo-Ukraine conflict, I turn to George Galloway's The Mother of All Talkshows, Richard Medhurst, The New Atlas, The Dive with Jackson Hinkle, Glenn Greenwald, The Duran, Alexander Mercouris, Gozalos Lira, Patrick Lancaster and anything from The GreyZone.
    10
  3282.  @Kingofthehill84  You said: "EVs can easily caught on fire by itself" Studies have shown that the risk of fire in a rechargeable vehicle is 0.0012 percent, compared to 0.1 percent for combustion engine vehicles. According to this statistic, fires in gasoline or diesel-powered cars are over 80 times more likely compared to EVs.
    10
  3283. Daniel Vedberg Sekulic Then can you tell me which countries today recognised Tibetan independence? The UN countries (USA, UK, France, Russia, Germany, Canada, etc) all recognise that Tibet is autonomous region of China today, so where's the basis for your argument that Tibet is its own sovereign state? Nobody in UN brings up the issue Tibetan independence to China during all those UN meetings, so doesn't that mean that they accept China's sovereignty over Tibet? You claim China nullify our own treaty with Tibet, but when did China ever do that? You claim that my argument one sided, then look at yours. You asked "Did life in Tibet improved?" and I already shown how much life in Tibet has improved didn't I? If the KMT or Mongolian want to claim China from the PLA, then they are always welcome to try and take back China from us. Nobody is stopping those governments going to UN to reclaim China isn't it? In fact, it was the UN decision to stop recognising the Republic of China in 1971, and to recognise People's Republic of China as China. How is this flawed logic then? Just like why you keep saying Westerners aren't allowed to Tibet? So many Western tourists come to Tibet every year to take pictures there, so where's the basis for your one sided argument? At least I quoted articles to support my claims, but all you done is make dubious claims without supporting your point at all. For example, Tibet received a record 10 million tourists, both foreign and local in 2012, so why do you claim Westerners aren't allowed to visit Tibet? Where's your proof?
    10
  3284.  @infernobat8325  The U.S accuse China of potentially sending military equipment to Russia (of which there is no proof) but on the other hand, the U.S sees nothing wrong with doing the same to Taiwan?
    10
  3285.  @infernobat8325  If those sanctions worked, then why is it that EU needs to impose an additional eleventh round, given that the first ten rounds of sanctions didn't work?
    10
  3286. If India blockade Chinese trade to the West, like USA, UK, Europe, etc, then likewise, those countries will not take kindly to India blocking their trade with China.
    10
  3287.  @userobd9528  In addition to being strategically located between Russia and China, as well as being a former Soviet country, Kazakhstan is also a participant in China's Belt and Road Initiative, most likely making it a likely choice for the NED to fund their next color revolution. A prime target indeed.
    10
  3288.  @adamnealis  No problem. Tibet has certainly changed a lot since 2007. Many people have visited Lhasa and uploaded videos of the city to YouTube. Especially Lhasa at night is filled with beautiful lights.
    10
  3289.  Kaptain Insano  Despite China's impressive military arsenal, China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. The USA is bombing those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off those Middle Eastern countries 'heads' (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now it appears that Assad of Syria and Maduro of Venezuela are at risk of US regime change agenda.
    10
  3290. Meanwhile, Ukraine should be called a washing machine.
    10
  3291.  @surjatjandra3270  Agreed. American diplomats like Jake Sullivan and Anthony Blinken already exihibit "un-diplomatic" behavior towards China, it's too much to believe that American MSM journalists are capable of being "journalistic" towards China.
    10
  3292.  @MarkYeung1  Why'd Hong Kong's population increased during the 2019 Hong Kong riots? Sounds like possible foreign interference in Hong Kong. And like I said earlier, those Hong Kong rioters fear reprisal for their actions, which is why they fled Hong Kong afterwards. Don't you agree that rioters who vandalise public property ought to be punished?
    10
  3293. The withdrawal of Western car brands from Russia because of the special military operation has allowed BYD to become the world's largest seller of EVs.
    10
  3294.  @MarkYeung1  Yet despite the effectiveness of China anti-doping agency, some Western swimmers still cast doubt on Chinese swimmers' ability after they won gold.
    10
  3295. Singapore is actually helping the U.S to contain China's rise. The U.S Navy aircraft carriers like USS Ronald Reagan docked on Singapore's Changi Naval Base, on their way to the South China Sea islands and their destination in the Taiwan Strait.
    10
  3296. War is no good for our countries and will hurt our growing economies. Do people really think Chinese building road to go to war? China is building roads in Donglong in order to provide a second road that allows Indian pilgrims to reach Kailash Mansarovar, and also possibly, Lhasa in Tibet. All this dispute is doing is wasting time and delaying progress by obstructing road construction.
    10
  3297.  @Esquera123  "if you are not smart, don’t act like you are smart." You don't even know what the world is. You claim America is the world and told others to go back to kindergarten, when even kindergarteners know that the world is all the people on the Earth. Yet here you are pretending that you are smart.
    10
  3298. At least Chinese are honest and if we like you, we drink with you and make jokes, and if we don't like you, you'll know it straight away. But Japanese folk are so unfailingly polite at all times, even towards their own family members they keep up their guard and their inhuman levels of politeness. It just doesn't seem good on Japanese mental health, if you act polite to everyone you meet.
    10
  3299. Agreed. Even the once powerful 19th century British Empire faded into a shadow of its former self, and was overtaken by the United States in the 20th century. In the 21st century, China is expected to do the same to the USA.
    10
  3300. ​ @tommyboss4067 Yes. Also, Rule No. 5: Don't Test Tehran.
    10
  3301. ​ @nightmark2120  Recently, the Philippines has been rapidly improving its relations and cooperation with China on various issues, developing a stronger and stable ties with China. Whereas the U.S fought a war in Philippines when they tried to gain independence.
    10
  3302.  @xprojectsa3627  Zelenskyy's speech to Israel completely backfired. He made statements about the holocaust that aren't historically true, showed no gratitude to Israel for all the aid, for taking refugees and for voting to condemn Russia at the UN, and basically demanded that Israel will supply him with weapons. The Israelis comments on social media were quite negative towards him. Goes to show that he's an actor, not a leader.
    10
  3303.  @Warmenlt  "...should have just simply picked up a phone and called Putin to politely ask him to stop invasion?..." Isn't that precisely what the journalist is expecting China to do? To pick up the phone and call Putin to stop the war? If you yourself don't believe in this action, then why pile expectations on China to do it? (As a matter of fact, President Xi has indeed spoken to President Putin over the phone)
    10
  3304. China is helping build infrastructure in less developed countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, Maldives and also African countries like Kenya, Nigeria, Angola, Djibouti. In just 30 years, China has done much to help develop African infrastructure compared to what Western countries been doing in Africa for centuries.
    10
  3305. But can India defend itself against Pakistan and China?
    10
  3306. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    10
  3307. Chairman Mao is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    10
  3308.  @refuze2quit603  Agreed. USA is the only developed country where the bottom 50% of poor Americans are getting poorer.
    10
  3309.  @blitz12399  150,000 homes in Russia, compared to 15 million vacant homes in the USA. Not to mention the homeless situation in the United States.
    10
  3310.  @ZastropollyonZ  If you look at China's history, China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    10
  3311. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has a wealth of political literature, governing manuals, military textbooks, and leadership experiences to draw upon and help guide China's leaders in governing the world's most populous country.
    10
  3312.  @mwang168  Indeed. Chinese culture is often stereotype as loving money, but Chinese also love health. As the Chinese adage goes: "Health is the best form of wealth" 健康是最大的财富。
    10
  3313.  @MrJanes-cl5sj  At the very least, Russia no longer have the send their supplies over the Dneiper River to the Western side of Kherson.
    10
  3314.  @MarkYeung1  About studying in China, China has also been a top destination for international students and as of 2013, China was the most popular country in Asia for international students and ranked 3rd overall among countries. China is now the leading destination globally for Anglophone African students and is host of the second largest international students population in the world. There were 22 Chinese universities on lists of the global top 200 in the 2020 Academic Ranking of World Universities, behind only the United States in terms of the overall representation.
    10
  3315.  @dinesh50448  Video: (Huawei isn't built on Chinese state funding youtu.be/HAffWwL1E-Q ) Huawei is employee-owned. 96,000 current and former staff own 100% of the company, that leaves exactly 0% in the hands of the Chinese government. Huawei does get some government subsidies for R&D, but that amounts to 0.3% of Huawei sales.
    10
  3316.  @jacwi8719  "神州 Shenzhou Of course China is "at peace now" because there is still the biggest obstacle the USA." So if according to you, USA is keeping China in check, who's keeping the warmongering USA in check?
    10
  3317.  @dinesh50448  "神州 Shenzhou you will never get Taiwan 🇹🇼 ask your soul." If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of all the territory that Taiwan claims (Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg )
    10
  3318.  @dinesh50448  Why are you resorting to making racist insults against Chinese people's eyes being small and not fully opened? Because Asian people's eyes look like that?
    10
  3319. The Americans lost the Vietnam War to poorly trained, poorly equipped, starving Vietnamese peasant conscripts, who were fighting and dying for their homeland, while US troops were dying on foreign soil.
    10
  3320.  @davis7428  China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and China has transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (or the largest if measured by GDP PPP), the world's factory (Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Chinese government.
    10
  3321. In Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia, the Crown Prince can just murder the journalists like Khashoggi, and US president Trump stands with Saudi Arabia and claim that murdered journalist was ‘enemy of the state.' Source: Trump ‘stands with’ Saudi Arabia and defends crown prince over Khashoggi theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/20/trump-saudi-arabia-jamal-khashoggi-crown-prince Thank heavens she was China, else she would have been murdered like in Saudi Arabia.
    10
  3322. Take care of yourself in America. People often say you have freedom of speech in America, but saying positive things about China might net you the term "communist party shill" so please be careful. Hope you and your family remain safe.
    10
  3323.  @relaxwhc  "神州 Shenzhou sure, stay here like a beggar then" Are you perhaps saying that all who post on this comment thread are beggars?
    10
  3324.  @kwokbear4359  Yes, the United State government spend large amounts of money bailing out the big corporations, but not the small enterprises.
    10
  3325. It's Canada and Mexico that were taken by surprise by Trump's tariffs. Whereas China has been preparing for additional tariffs since Trump's first term.
    10
  3326.  @joecleary579  Exactly. Russia concluded its elections by 17th March, Meanwhile Zelenskyy's term as president is due to expire by 20th May, and it looks as though Ukraine won't be having any elections anytime soon.
    10
  3327.  @eynemig-174ji  Indeed. Under those principles, the Bhutanese military have expelled over 100,000 Bhutanese of Nepali origins (around 40% of Bhutan's population at the time). No Bhutanese refugees have been allowed to return to Bhutan despite negotiations taking place. Sounds more like Western values than Asian values.
    10
  3328. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. The US's actions seem to indicate that it's a threat to global peace and stability.
    10
  3329.  @ashokjain8449  Why is Chinese government a criminal organisation and an enemy of mankind? China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. So why do you seem to think that Chinese people need "rescuing"?
    10
  3330.  @comradetirer  You claim there's overwhelming evidence, then why is Russia calling for an investigation into Bucha? Why'd the UN Human rights rejected Russia's request for an investigation?
    10
  3331.  @comradetirer  So why'd Russia call for an UN investigation into Bucha? Only for the chair of the UN (currently Britain) to reject to hear the Russian side of the story? You said mass graves and cellars filled with bodies, then shouldn't there be a proper independent investigation into Bucha?
    10
  3332.  @暗黑元首  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    10
  3333. It's like a boxing match between U.S and China, but one where the U.S is too busy punching himself, while China is training and doing push-ups to get stronger.
    10
  3334.  @smoochie3331  China is home to 90% of the world's rare earth metals production. Rare Earths are used in technology like magnets and super magnets, motors, metal alloys, electronic and computing equipment, batteries, catalytic converters, petroleum refining, medical imaging, colouring agents in glass and ceramics, phosphors, lasers and special glass. Decoupling from China, means that the U.S would no longer have access to products that contain rare earth metals from China.
    10
  3335.  @charliebrandt2263  You said: "You do not have the full picture." Neither do you have the exact full picture. What we need is a truly independent investigation into Oct 7. But you said roughly what I was trying to say, that many "civilian" casualties on Oct 7 could have been cause by crossfire from the IDF.
    10
  3336.  @KamillGran-ch5sb  " Trump was actually able to create a more peaceful world," He gave the green light for the assassination of Iranian General Suleiman.
    10
  3337. China has the world's longest range ICBM, the DF-41, with an operational range between 12,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the range of the US LGM-30 Minuteman which has a reported range of 13,000 km.
    10
  3338. More people in Taiwan need to wake up and realize that USA doesn't really care about Taiwan democracy, as long as they can use Taiwan as a chess piece to contain the mainland's rise that's all. The U.S abandonment of Afghanistan and NATO's refusal to put boots on the ground to defend Ukraine should sound alarm bells that Taiwan might face the same abandonment by USA.
    10
  3339.  Naikomi  According to Credit Suisse Wealth Report: There’re more poor people in America than there are in China. To a reasonable level of accuracy there’s no one in China in the bottom 10% of the world’s population by wealth. And yet there’s some 10% of those global poor in North America, and another 20% or so in Europe. So, yes, it really is true that there’re more poor people in America (and Europe) than there are in China.
    10
  3340. Refreshing to see this type of comment for once.
    10
  3341.  @Planetarian43  "Shenzhou. Taiwan is a part of China." Absolutely. But the problem is that some separatist forces in the island do not accept that statement and here in lies the crux of the problem. There's nothing fundamentally wrong with suggesting a "second-best solution" but you'll have to accept that some people may not like it as well. "On the question of Singapore, there is no historical foundation for Singapore to talk about Singapore joining Chinese Commonwealth." So if you pitch the idea to say, Mongolia, (which was historically part of Yuan Dynasty China) does that mean that they'll want in on it?
    10
  3342.  @smallderick9099  You said: "in 2001 USA introduced them to word trade organisation" The World Trade Organisation was founded in 1995 and China had aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate our country as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because the United States, European countries, and Japan requested that China first reform various tariff policies, including tariff reductions, open markets and industrial policies. Yet you're behaving as though the US introduced China to the WTO?
    10
  3343.  @smallderick9099  Skipped the point? Like I said, China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member back when the WTO was founded. This would validate our country as a world economic power, but this attempt was thwarted because the United States, European countries, and Japan requested that China first reform various tariff policies, including tariff reductions, open markets and industrial policies. So don't pretend as though the US introduced WTO to China in 2001, when they posed an obstacle to China's entry into WTO.
    10
  3344. Quitting does not solve the problem. Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam should remain in power and solve the issue herself, rather than resigning.
    10
  3345.  @deschan2246  Irreversible damage? Trump's tariffs won't last forever you know, and President Trump himself will eventually have to step down once his term limits are over. And the next US President might just start reversing Trump's policies and lift the trade war, thus possibly resulting in a future economic boom for China, as US-China trade relations resume their previous pre-tradewar levels. Who knows?
    10
  3346. 西方媒体非常傲慢与偏见。
    10
  3347.  @paulodelima5705  Actually, the population of Uighurs in Xinjiang has increased by 16% since 2010.
    10
  3348. China should commemorate the ground where the spacecraft landed in Inner Mongolia, as a milestone of China's space exploration program.
    10
  3349.  @PUTLERLOVESTRUMPSKY  Remember what? Tiananmen Square is one of the largest parade squares in China, and China celebrated the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China with a parade in the Square.
    10
  3350.  @padraicley3265  "神州 Shenzhou Most former Eastern block countries left mother USSR the ex-husband is so great." But that was the former Soviet Union, you specifically said "Russia Putin" and Putin's presidency was inaugurated in the Kremlin on 7 May 2012, so which "ex-wife" was beaten up post 2012, after Putin was in power? You said: "Russia has a GDP of Texas after Putin in power for 20 years" Well, Ukraine has a GDP 10 times smaller than Russia/Texas, so it already throws your claim that "The Ex-husband is getting angry the ex-wife is doing better than he ever can and decide to ruin her." out the window, since Ukraine wasn't doing better than Russia. You said: "discriminates the LGBT community," The ultranationalist, neo nazis in Ukraine like the Azov Battalion have made homophobic remarks. One of the Azov members even boasted that if not for them, the Maidan Protest would be (in his words) a "gay parade" You said: "Poison opposite party leaders in his country." Ukraine jails their opposition members too. You said: " A low self esteme ex-husband alright." But Russia's GDP is 10 times that of Ukraine, how's that low esteem? Ukraine appears to be the one with low esteem, as it thinks joining NATO and EU will somehow improve their economy, but it's apparent that for all their encouragement of Ukraine joining NATO, they aren't going to let that happen, because it would mean NATO would be obliged to send reinforcements to defend Ukraine if it were a member. Why would a low-esteem husband be willing to take on the village bully (USA) and his harem of wives (NATO countries), if he had low self-esteem? He must be supremely confident in his ability to handle whatever the West throws at him, this is basically the opposite of low self-esteem right here. You said: "You may not understand economic, debt is necessary for growth." But you said the ex-husband borrowed from the mob, yet Russia is ranked 14th in the world with the lowest debt. You said: "High debt nations like Japan, the US and even China are doing well" Macao SAR has 0% debt compared to its GDP, and Hong Kong SAR has 0.99% debt compared to its GDP, yet they are developing alright. You said: "Is he really asking Communist China for money and weapon?" Since NATO countries are slapping sanctions on Russia, then Russia is seeking to do more business with China that's all. As for weapons, China literally imports weapons from Russia, so what makes you think Russia is going to ask China for weapons?
    10
  3351.  @syanreeze253  It's the USA that started spreading malicious rumors about Huawei's alleged spying. Even Germany's IT watchdog has expressed scepticism about calls for a boycott of Chinese telecoms giant Huawei, saying it has seen no evidence the firm could use its equipment to spy for Beijing. Source: German IT watchdog says 'no evidence' of Huawei spying https://www.thelocal.de/20181216/german-it-watchdog-says-no-evidence-of-huawei-spying "For such serious decisions like a ban, you need proof," the head of Germany's Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Arne Schönbohm, told Spiegel, adding that his agency had no such evidence.
    10
  3352. @@USA11111 The might U.S army lost a 20-year war in Afghanistan against a bunch of insurgents, with a shambolic withdrawal from Kabul, leaving behind billions in military equipment for the Taliban to acquire.
    10
  3353.  @sreeniv09  China has 14 land neighbors and have settled border disputes with all our land neighbors except for India and Bhutan. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed a border agreement. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed a border agreement. -In 2009, Kyrgyzstan and China signed a border agreement. -In 1992, Laos and China signed a border agreement. -In 1964, Mongolia and China signed a border agreement. -In 1960, Myanmar and China signed a border agreement. -In 1960, Nepal and China signed a border agreement. -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed a border agreement. -In 1991, Soviet Union and China signed a border agreement. -In 2011, Tajikistan and China signed a border agreement. -In 1999, Vietnam and China signed a border agreement. ... Source: Wikipedia: Borders of China Only Bhutan and India haven't signed a border agreement with China, even though there have been more than 10 meetings to settle our border. So it's not for a lack of trying at least on China's part.
    10
  3354.  @milaong9618  Exactly. After the Japanese WWII surrender, the Republic of China sent four warships to the South China Sea to secure islands within the region. One of the ships was leased from the United States, the USS Decker, which was renamed ROCS Taiping under the ROC Navy. Taiping Island was named in honor of this ship that liberated the island from the Japanese.
    10
  3355.  @JB52520  Agreed. Developers are the building blocks of new technology. If HarmonyOS is able to cater to developers, then many new apps will appear.
    10
  3356.  @rgandblue  100 years of humiliation happened because Qing Dynasty China (ruled by Manchurians) was overconfident, grew complacent, and lagged behind the West technologically. Now its different, China's technology is fast catching up (even surpassing) that of the West as shown in Brian's video.
    10
  3357.  @benproffitt5957  China and Russia provide an alternative voice for the developing world to be heard, while the U.S and its "allies" (i.e Australia, Canada, EU, etc) don't.
    10
  3358.  @TomChenLife  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    10
  3359. I'm pretty sure that if you gave these two hosts a Map of China, they couldn't even point out Xinjiang province or Shenzhen city, yet they just claim it was an independent country before.
    10
  3360.  @joebloe1401  Is that so? Cyrus' videos have the underlying message of "Building Bridges, not Walls" then are you saying that Chinese are promoting this positive message?
    10
  3361. +Roy Vermie I think China would try not to engage the US in open waters. China's strategy would be more defensive within the South China Sea.
    9
  3362. That sounds like what the US did during Korean War.
    9
  3363. +Evan Tansimore 汉字 (Hanzi) is also used in Japanese as Kanji (漢字). But the usage could be different in Japanese and vice versa.
    9
  3364. ***** Selling opium? Have you confused CCP with the opium wars with the British? That was during Qing dynasty not PRC period. Mao was against foreign influence like opium that was destroying Chinese youths and got rid of it. CCP has already admitted that GLF and Cultural Revolution policies were failures. Mao even admitted to poor planning during GLF. These events are taught in Chinese history and have both good and bad points. But people have to move on from the past. CCP only blocks websites like Facebook and Twitter, not the entire Internet. Most Chinese prefer Chinese language websites like Weibo instead of English ones. Chinese people only want peace. As long as there is economic progress, most Chinese are okay with the government.
    9
  3365. As Chinese person, most traditional Chinese people view wealth, fame and status as indicators of success. Not that I agree with it completely of course, but that is the way most Chinese people think.
    9
  3366. +DanDanDirt China is a member of UN Convention Law of the Sea and so far, has not broken any law. The Permanent Court of Arbitration that Philippines went to is not even an agency of United Nations. It should have submitted the complaint to the International Court of Justice, which is part of UN.
    9
  3367.  @derquantenalchemist5180  It's regrettable that after all the hard work you put into building your channel, only to have it shadowbanned. Hopefully its only temporary as you suggested and for your account to be restored.
    9
  3368.  @ashpatel2505  "I also have a suggestion for you to research and comprehend the phrase, Colonial Mindset so that you can use it when appropriate." I've already plenty defined what Colonial Mentality is, how many times are you going to ask me that? Colonial mentality is when the an individual has been so heavily influenced by colonialist thinking, such that they subconsciously revere Anglo-Saxon culture, while harboring disdain for their own culture. You've already displayed this sort of mentality when you said: "Remember it’s not what you think about China matters, but what the civilized world thinks about China matters!".
    9
  3369.  @ashpatel2505  I've already explained previously why Chinese use English names, it's precisely because Mandarin names are difficult to pronounce in English, which is why some Chinese use an English name for convince. Even Xi Jinping is often pronounced wrongly by English people. Whereas Indian names like Modi have no problems being translated into English. As for Western attire, the wearing of trousers (pants) was invented in China. The world's oldest pair of trousers were found at the Yanghai cemetery in Turpan, Sinkiang (Tocharia), in present-day western China, dating to the period between the 13th and the 10th centuries BC. So what's wrong with Chinese people wearing trousers when it was invented in China?
    9
  3370.  @qingdaocitizen7957  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    9
  3371. Both Israel and the United States believe in "exceptionalism."
    9
  3372. China and Russia are facilitating the transition towards multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the United States and its "allies").
    9
  3373.  @MarkYeung1  My point is that if the West wanted China to be a mediator, then why are they threatening China with sanctions instead of wooing China with incentives?
    9
  3374.  @MarkYeung1  Just recently, the Azov Battalion in the Azovstal Steel plant literally surrendered to the Russian forces and were taken into custody to Russian hospitals (although the Western MSM preferred to label it an evacuation). Are you saying calling for shame upon the Azov Battalion? And no, they aren't the same people as those who called for the Chinese government to surrendering to the invading Japanese, why are you deliberately trying to conflate the two together?
    9
  3375. China has demonstrated anti-satellite capablities such as during 2007 Chinese anti-satellite test, so what happens when Indian army's satellites are taken out of orbit?
    9
  3376.  @vietnguyen4312  Again, that's because if you divide China's GDP by our enormous population, then on the per capita basis, Taiwan's is going to be higher than the mainland. And even though the average Taiwan people earn more than the mainland, there is economic stagnation in Taiwan, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, inflation is rising in Taiwan as compared to the mainland.
    9
  3377.  @junebug8485  "神州 Shenzhou They can transport water to the plant, it's not a major issue." Why build those foundries in the arid state of Arizona in the first place? Transporting the water to Arizona is going to cost money too, so the price of Made-in-U.S chips is going to cost more. Also, once the U.S transfer of Taiwan's TSMC technology is complete, the island itself no longer serves any further use for the U.S to defend isn't it?
    9
  3378. The United States deported fmore than half a million* illegal immigrant parents from their kids since 2009. Source: washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/09/21/this-is-what-would-happen-to-the-children-of-11-million-illegal-immigrants-if-president-trump-deported-them/ Their country, their rules, just like our country, our rules.
    9
  3379.  @Merlinever  Are you saying that the US before, never imported slaves from Africa, caused genocide of Native Americans and occupied their lands even till today?
    9
  3380.  @americanpatriot126  How exactly does China erase other cultures? Ethnic minorities in China (e.g Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchu, even Koreans in Northeastern China) aren't subject to the One Child Policy, so they can have as many kids as they want. The population of ethnic minorities in China actually increased over the years under communist party leadership.
    9
  3381. China is investing in African countries, building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, schools, hotels, hospitals, shopping centres, ports, airports, dams, powerstations and telecommunication projects. China has done much to develop Africa in decades, as compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    9
  3382.  @michaelkatz275  It's all there in Wikipedia: White Australia policy
    9
  3383.  @michaelkatz275  "What is a white supremacist mentality??" It's basically an extension of the colonial mentality, of worshiping Anglo-Saxon culture, while harboring disdain for any "non-white" culture. For example, even though Australia is located closer to Asia than Europe, and that Australia's closest neighbors are Asian countries, they act like a Western country with regards to their mentality.
    9
  3384.  @xyzaero  Russia has overtaken Germany to become the 5th wealthiest economy in the world and the largest in Europe, worth $5.3 trillion. Country's GDP by PPP 1. China: $30.3 trillion 2. USA: $25.4 trillion 3. India: $11.8 trillion 4. Japan: $5.7 trillion 5. Russia: $5.32 trillion 6. Germany $5.3 trillion ... Source: Intellinews
    9
  3385.  @xyzaero  You said: "so in the emd of the day Russians produce next to nothing." Are you serious? Russia makes arguably the world's most advanced anti-air defense system in the world, the S-400, that's in huge demand by countries all over the world. Russia is also the world's largest exporter of wheat and fertilizer, which are important for feeding global communities. Even NASA today still relies on Russia's rocket engines to launch their spacecraft. I mean, everyone knows that the Soviets were the first to launch a satellite into orbit, Sputnik, and the first man in space was Soviet Cosmonaut, Yuri Gargarin, and the first space station was the Soviet Salyut. Seems like you're just being anti-Russia at this point by disregarding their achievements.
    9
  3386. Chinese government and workers built brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan) in Wuhan in 10, followed by 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan) in 12 days, yet anti-China people called them mere "containers." Now that Covid-19 has hit USA, they're building "tents" to treat the infected.
    9
  3387. It's because of capitalism that caused Hong Kong's land prices to skyrocket beyond the reach of many young Hong Kong couples seeking to settle down. The rich Hong Kong property tycoons control the supply of land, so they jack up prices until it becomes unaffordable to ordinary Hong Kong couples. The Hong Kong government closes one eye, because Hong Kong government doesn't collect revenue from taxing businesses (Hong Kong is a tax haven for capitalistic) so the government earn revenue by taxing land sales instead, so they want property sales to be huge in order to tax more.
    9
  3388. Mykhailo Podolyak just stepped on the toes of two the world's most populous countries.
    9
  3389. Japan also has one of the world's highest suicide rates.
    9
  3390. @Anthony M Ukraine was arguably at it's most prosperous while as part of the Soviet Union. Ukraine was the largest per-capita producer in Europe of pig iron and sugar, and the second-largest per-capita producer of steel and of iron ore, and was the third largest per-capita producer of coal in Europe. All while it was part of the USSR. Fast forward till today and if you look up Europe's poorest country, Ukraine frequently pops up in the results.
    9
  3391. Seems like not only American diplomats like Jake Sullivan and Anthony Blinken are bullish towards China, but American MSM journalists are too as well.
    9
  3392.  @RBDawg  The U.S government has diplomats like Jake Sullivan and Anthony Blinken, whose behavior towards China is anything but diplomatic, and this same arrogant behavior is being reflected by American MSM journalists like this woman.
    9
  3393. Hopium is usually taken before the betrayal, in hopes that it will get better. After the inevitable betrayal, Copium is taken to cope with the betrayal.
    9
  3394.  @xpro2009  About the benefits and convenience of modern ways/methods and technology, did you know that China is home to the world's largest high-speed railway network in the world in terms of track length? Our trains are fast and the journeys are smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even tried balancing a coin on its edge in a train travelling at 350km/h and the coin will remain balanced and not topple for a long time. This is a testament of China's advances in high-speed rail technology.
    9
  3395.  @bv2011  Agreed. I know of some overseas Chinese (but not all) that still suffer from a subservient "colonial mindset" as a remnant of colonialism. Western imperialism founded many colonies in Asia and South East Asia, in regions with overseas Chinese populations. But even after physical decolonization of those regions, the "decolonization of the mind" still needs to happen more, to heal the mental scars inflicted by the colonizers on the minds of the colonized.
    9
  3396.  @KuangWen0  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today. For this reason, I will always be grateful to our founding father. Those Chinese who hate Chairman Mao tend to be the Chinese living in Hong Kong, Taiwan island, or overseas Chinese living in Singapore, Malaysia and elsewhere.
    9
  3397. China has world's longest range ICBM, the DF-41, having an operational range of 13,000 km to 15,000 km. How will the mountain range shield India, if Chinese missiles can literally fly over the Himalayas?
    9
  3398.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Check out what Russia has done to Syria" Russia has supported the Assad administration of Syria against the Western-sponsored draft resolutions in the UN Security Council that demanded his resignation. Assad is well-liked by the Syrian people (you can find videos of Assad casually walking around the streets) and he has recently returned to the Arab league. So isn't Russia a force for peace in Syria?
    9
  3399.  @billyehh  Angela Merkel too, she had a 4th term while Xi is at his 3rd.
    9
  3400.  @billyehh  It's actually the U.S that's the world's most protectionist country. According to the Global Alert, from 2008–2013, the U.S had over 800 protectionist measures, while China only had 100-200 of such measures. Source: Wikipedia: Protectionism
    9
  3401. I watch George Galloway's Mother of All Talkshows, Richard Medhurts, Glenn Greenwald, Jackson Hinkle, The Duran, Gonzalo Lira, Patrick Lancaster, and anything from The Greyzone for information on the Ukraine crisis, that's different from the Western MSM lies.
    9
  3402.  @plethos  Because people understood his argument that's why they say Scott is level-headed in his insights regarding the subject matter of the conflict in Ukraine. Whereas you're bringing up his history that has nothing to do with the subject matter.
    9
  3403.  Beast Mode  The USA is facing rising inflation, rising gas prices, rising food prices, rising healthcare costs as compare to China.
    9
  3404. @nationalghost The Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again, which government body is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, India, Europe and USA. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China), the world's 3rd largest arms exporter, having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army and funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And its all been achieved under the CCP leadership. Despite the Westerner's biased anti-Communist propaganda, China has succeeded under CCP rule, so why not allow CCP to continue ruling China, since they done a good job of it?
    9
  3405.  @valeenoi2284  —神州 Shenzhou You "heard", or you "know" that's a fact?— You yourself began your comment with that word "I've heard China is so awesome…" so much what's your point? If you want to talk about prison populations then it's actually America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate
    9
  3406.  @MH-il1lk  The Ukrainian genocide could end instantly if Zelenskyy sue for peace.
    9
  3407. The mainland is using Hong Kong as a testbed for democracy, and it appears the test has failed, Hong Kong is in chaos, protests are destroying Hong Kong's economy, so why should democracy spread to the mainland then? Mainland cities are thriving under CCP rule, while Hong Kong is suffering under democracy.
    9
  3408.  @elanor2123  "神州 Shenzhou Again, I only compared the number of militias given by yourself." Why only the militia and not the regular troops? All in all, I've already demonstrated that the Nationalist KMT outnumbered the communists even after the Japanese had surrendered. Initially, the Nationalist KMT had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily too) superior weapons and superior numbers, the KMT still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while at the same time cementing the communists right to rule China. You said: "And I believe the condition of the PLA soldiers were relatively better, both physically and mentally.." Do you have evidence to support your claims? If not, then it's just speculation on your part without proof.
    9
  3409. Agreed. It's a combination of the "Red Scare" (fear of communism) and "Yellow Peril" (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many Westerners have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that very thought of a non-Western, non-liberal democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States is unfathomable to many Westerners.
    9
  3410. The "American Dream" is that every immigrant can someday strike it rich and climb the corporate ladder to become CEO of a company. The "Chinese Dream" is the eventual rejuvenation of Chinese civilisation, to wipe away the humiliation of last century and for China to achieve a moderately well-off society and to revitalise the nation.
    9
  3411. Putin had tried diplomacy, he wrote a paper stating that Russia wants assurances that NATO would not expand eastwards (i.e that Ukraine not be allowed to join NATO). In fact, many NATO countries like Germany and France were reluctant to admit Ukraine into NATO (due to Ukraine corruption issues), yet NATO refused to put that down on paper to reassure Putin. After realizing that his words have fallen on deaf ears all this time, Putin decided to act instead.
    9
  3412.  @RobertAmer  I think you've misunderstood my comment. What @Arvind Talukdar is asking is the scenario where Azov Battalion soldiers hijack this white armband to disguise themselves as pro-Russia residents to spy on the Russian forces (who think they are friendly because they sport the white-armband). But I'm sure the Russian forces have countermeasures in place, since they can catch Azov soldiers who disguised as civilians to flee the battles.
    9
  3413.  @christopherdrake1028  China today is not a Western democracy, yet China is world's 2nd largest economy. This is living proof that not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful.
    9
  3414.  @catmandu6776  Imperial Japan refused to surrender even after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing mostly Japanese civilians, women, children, the elderly and men unfit for active frontline duty. The vast majority of Imperial Japanese military strength was unaffected by the bombings, and that's why Japan refused to surrender. The last battle fought of WWII was actually the Soviet Union's invasion of Japanese occupied Manchuria that finally caused Imperial Japan to surrender at the end of WWII. So if anything, we should be thanking the Soviet Communists for finally putting an end to WWII and causing Japan to surrender.
    9
  3415. Marvel's Shang-Chi isn't really an example of China's soft power on the world, it's actually an American superhero film produced by Marvel Studios and distributed by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures. China didn't really had anything to do with the production of that film, and it actually appears though that Hollywood made the film to target mainland China audiences.
    9
  3416. In my opinion, there's nothing wrong with such people wanting to get married privately, but then why should they expect rest of society to bend over backward for them, and allow them to adopt kids? Because USA does so? How will adopted kids in such families grow up influenced by their "parent's" orientation? Will other kids in normal families make fun of them in school etc? Why subject adopted kids to the prospect of growing up in such families, instead of a normal family? Even in America, there is much opposition towards liberal LGBT issues, such as transgender bathroom. Imagine if you are straight girl, and suddenly a transgender enters your toilet. Won't this also be vulnerable to exploitation by perverts, dressing up to enter women's toilets? In Orlando Nightclub there was even tragic shooting at a gay nightclub, presumably perpetrated by a conservative against such LGBT issues. I believe that China should create our own path regarding homosexuality issues, instead of just attempting to emulate America, just because attitudes are different in USA than in China. If you want society to sacrifice for you as an individual, then in the same way, you will have to be willing to make sacrifices for society as well. Anyway, this is just my feelings regarding such issues.
    9
  3417.  @Andy-P  The Michaels were arrested on espionage charges in China. Meanwhile, the Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou did not break any Canadian laws while in Canada, yet she was arrested and detained by Canadian border authorities for nearly 3 years.
    9
  3418. They were silent... They can't possibly bite the hand that feed them...
    9
  3419.  @JJRM8  The Antonov Airport in Hostomel was captured by Russian forces on 25 February 2022, following an operation involving some 200 helicopters. The Ukrainian Ministry of Internal Affairs initially denied that the airport had been fully captured by the Russian forces, stating that it had been "changing hands" and that the battle was ongoing. Later in the day, Ukraine confirmed that Russian forces were in control of the airport.
    9
  3420.  @mojito4493  Why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? Yet you're saying that KMT deserves to rule the mainland?
    9
  3421.  @pointingoutpoints3661  China has amphibious assault vehicles like the ZTD-05 (VN18) said to be world's fastest amphibious assault vehicle, able to attain sailing speeds of up to 30kmph, which is the fastest of it's kind. Video: Chinese firm built 'fastest' amphibious assault vehicle youtu.be/4rzoWPWbai8 The tracks and wheel can withdraw into the body to reduce water traction and it's max ground speed is 65kmph, with a cannon, a machine gun and 14 people on board. It's engine can produce 1600 horsepower, a figure normally associated with heavy tanks.
    9
  3422.  Gaylord Manlove  Stop the killing African Americans like George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks at the hands of police officers.
    9
  3423.  @iloveporkandchicken4718  You are Indonesian Chinese, yet you don't speak Mandarin Chinese, instead you can speak Bahasa Indonesia. It's because Indonesian (world's largest Muslim population country) president Suharto banned expressions of Chinese culture through language, religion, and traditional festivals and the ethnic Chinese were pressured to adopt Indonesian-sounding names. So why can't Chinese government teach Uighurs Mandarin Chinese then? Mandarin Chinese is the national language of China, and Xinjiang is part of China isn't it?
    9
  3424.  Speed&Kustom  Why are people attempting to doxx Cyrus Janssen? Because his message is to promote peace and understanding, not war between USA and China?
    9
  3425.  @kevinedwards7596  If Cyrus Janssen is supposedly "paid by the Chinese government" to spread his peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" then isn't that a good thing? Look at the sheer amount of Western anti-China propaganda constantly trying to manufacture consent for war with China among their audiences.
    9
  3426. USA is only using India for its own benefit. Look at President Trump slapping tariffs on steel and aluminum, which have affected India negatively. USA is no friend of India, China or Russia, and that's why BRICS was formed to oppose the Western powers.
    9
  3427. +Haruka ino But your earlier comment read: "神州 Shenzhou I'm not talking about Nanking" but it is clear that you are talking about Nanjing here. So why do you appear to be contradicting yourself here?
    9
  3428.  @MarkYeung1  Did the Chinese people themselves asked for democracy, or was democracy imposed because it the United States threatened sanctions on Taiwan if the Kuomintang do not introduce political reforms? Taiwan had actually been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life and it was during this period that Taiwan was at its most economically prosperous.
    9
  3429.  @lilylu4555  Before Canada, Meng had visited 6 other countries with extradition treaties with the US, namely Britain, Ireland, Japan, France, Poland and Belgium. Those 6 countries did their homework on Meng Wanzhou, that's why they refused to cooperate with the USA extradition. Only Canada didn't do their homework, and just blindly agreed to detain Meng, because USA says so, now Canada is stuck in this mess of their own doing. The lesson learnt is that the next time USA wants your country to extradite someone, think twice before you acquiesce.
    9
  3430.  @rufanuf1  You said: "We are allowed to have opinions. We do not try to "hush" the opposition." Is that so? Well why is it that you seem to impose your view onto others, at times even resorting to hurling ad hominen fallacies against others, just because our views differ from yours? I've explained in detail how Taiwan was ruled under the KMT (and mind you, this is in keeping with Chinese heritage) and Taiwan's economy flourished under it. Taiwan's economic growth slowed after democracy was introduced to the island in the 1990s. I mean, if the system isn't broken, why fix it? Taiwan was flourishing without Western-style democracy, then is there really a need to implement such a system? Because Westerners say so?
    9
  3431. America is an immigrant country, a New World country and opens its doors to virtually everyone, because the American Dream is all about how a poor immigrant can hope to strike it rich someday in America. Whereas China is an Old World country, our people were here before, and the Chinese Dream is the rejuvenation of our country. So the government has a strict immigration criteria so that only beneficial immigrants (scientists, engineers, businessmen, investors) can enter the country while keeping the undesirables (drug abusers, dissidents, deadbeats, etc) out of China.
    9
  3432. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    9
  3433. These student leaders were naive and idealistic, having being raised in cloistered environment of education, and being taught textbook ideals and perfect ideologies. They haven't even stepped out into the real world, get a job, settle down and raise a family, yet they somehow think they know how the best way to govern China already?
    9
  3434.  @chrishamlin5863  Did you know that one of the most popular female actress (Dilraba Dilmurat) in China is of Uighur descent? She remains popular even till today.
    9
  3435. SillyName Like you said, Greece culture and language endures, but the "civilization" has long since ended. I never said anything about culture and language here.
    9
  3436. China focus on domestic issues, instead of intervening in other country's internal problems. U.S intervene in other country's internal problems, instead of focusing on domestic issues.
    9
  3437. I think democracy has multiple definitions. The most common definition is that of a government of the people, by the people, for the people. Under this definition, the U.S is not a democracy, it's a plutocracy, with a government of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%. Because the U.S government is just not delivering what the people want. On the other hand, China is a democracy in the sense that the government is doing what the people want, as the Harvard University and Ash Center survey revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China.
    9
  3438.  @ColoniaMurder20  "神州 Shenzhou with chinese logic.. are you claiming Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia who are majority of Austronesian speaking people were part of China as well?" Did I ever said that? I pointed out that the current Taiwan aborigines were descended from farmers from mainland China that arrived on Taiwan some 5,000 years ago that's all. When did I ever said Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia were part of China?
    9
  3439.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou American voters definitely picked the right president in 2020." Donald Trump was one of the few U.S presidents that did not start any new war during his term. Whereas Joe Biden has a history of previously expressing support for the Iraq War as a senator. Although both Trump and Biden wanted America out of the Afghan War, President Biden botched the U.S withdrawal from Afghanistan, causing panic of Afghans and tragic death of Afghans and U.S servicemen during ISIS bombings. The U.S retaliatory drone strike wrongly killed an Afghan family (including kids) and U.S General Mark Milley just apologized with no further consequences for U.S killing Afghan civilians. Furthermore, the Biden Administration abandoned billions of dollars of U.S weapons and military equipment in Afghanistan, including BlackHawk Helicopters that have now under the control of the Taliban. As for trade policies, even though Trump started the U.S-China trade war, the Biden Administration hasn't undone Trump's tariffs, so Americans are still suffering under increased prices of goods because of tariffs. Trump didn't care about so-called "human rights issues" in Xinjiang, Hong Kong or Taiwan, it's the Biden Administration that's raising up these internal issues with China, and potentially provoking war, so how exactly did the Americans picked the right president in 2020?
    9
  3440.  @amc3463  But there's no other option for Ukraine. NATO and US aren't going to put boots on the ground to defend Ukraine. Ukraine's membership to NATO is not going to happen, because it means NATO would be obliged to send reinforcements to defend Ukraine if it were a member. Zelenskyy just wants to maximise civilian casualties by prolonging the war, releasing prisoners and arming civilians with rifles so that these human shields fight and die for his refusal to surrender.
    9
  3441. +TalesOfGod Immigration presents its own set of problems. Europe is having an Immigration Crisis, where Muslim refugees migrate to Germany, Britain, France, etc, and they still retain their traditions (like wearing Muslim veil in public) instead of assimilating into their predominantly Christian host countries. Many live off welfare and collect food stamps, and while Caucasian families low birth rate means only 1 or 2 kids per couple, but Muslim families are huge (especially with multiple wives). Lastly, Muslims marriages require non-Muslims to convert to Islam in order to propagate their faith.
    9
  3442. I think Brian's lived long enough in Thailand to be able to pronounce local names fluently.
    9
  3443.  @SenorJuan2023  But has he been formally sentenced in a court of law? He was indicted many times but nothing comes afterwards, so could this be a form of political persecution by his opponents? I thought Americans believed in the rule of law.
    9
  3444. After the Korean War, North Korea was actually the more prosperous country on the Korean Peninsula, while the democratic South Korea had a GDP lower than sub-Saharan African countries. North Korea's growth was stymied when the U.S slapped crippling sanctions on DPRK, while simultaneously pouring U.S aid ($35 billion) into South Korea, transforming once one of the poorest nations, into the world’s 12th largest economy.
    9
  3445.  @shreyaskumarrath721  I've never stated that all Indians suffer from a colonial mentality, but this mindset continues in some Indians even till today. The colonial mentality also affects even mark yeung, when he deliberately close one eye and overlook British actions that led up to the conflicts in South Asian continent even till today. You said: "We know merging Bangladesh would make it harder for India as a whole unless they wanted to be a part themselves." Bangladesh was formerly part of Pakistan (i.e East Pakistan) but it was India that supported Bangladesh independence and cause Pakistan to lose East Pakistan and this made Pakistan suspicious of India.
    9
  3446.  @performancefluid3666  Before the economic reform in late 1970s, Shenzhen (深圳) was a backward wetland village, just next door to flourishing skyscraper-filled port city of Hong Kong. Today, Shenzhen is a technological mecca, home to the latest gadgets, computers, electronics, Artificial Intelligence systems, drones, automation, robotics, etc and had you been a land owner in Shenzhen in 1970s, you would be rich today with Shenzhen's booming economy.
    9
  3447.  @EstanislaoSantino-xk8uz  So you won't take issue if I commented some more?
    9
  3448. Like Kishore Mahbubani said, "don't insult your opponent" China has been forecasted to eventually surpass the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the foreseeable future, by being arrogant towards a rising power, what do you think is going to happen once China becomes a superpower?
    9
  3449. A snake, like his name implies.
    9
  3450.  @mikef6399  Indeed. Imperial Japan committed numerous wartime atrocities like Nanjing Massacre, Unit 731, and comfort women. During the Nanjing Massacre, Japanese soldiers butchered Chinese men for sport, and held contest to see who could rack up the most kills. Chinese women were gangaped and killed, their naked bodies left exposed and mutilated, their private regions bayoneted or having sharp sticks of bamboo shoved in. The young and elderly weren't spared, and Japanese soldiers sliced open the bodies of babies to commit unspeakable atrocities onto them. Japanese forced families to perform acts of incense; Sons were forced to do their mothers and fathers to daughters. Pregnant women were gangaped and had their swollen bellies stabbed, the unborn fetus torn from their wombs and bayoneted right before their eyes.
    9
  3451. 100% Capitalist means that private companies own all means of production whatsoever. This is clearly not the case in China, because the private companies are ultimately subject to the government's control.
    9
  3452.  @dannyw985  Logically speaking, America's bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki mostly killed Japanese civilians; women, children, the elderly and men unfit for active military duty. Much of Japan's military strength remained unaffected by the 2 atomic bombings, that's why Japan refused to surrender even after the bombings. It was the Soviet invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria that was the last campaign fought of WWII and finally caused Japan to surrender. So if anything, we should be thanking the Communist Party of Soviet Union for bringing an end to WWII, not America's bombing of Japanese civilians.
    9
  3453.  @chafiqbantla1816  Russia actually has low debt, here's a list of 10 countries with the Lowest Debt-to-GDP Ratios (%) 1. Brunei — 3.2% 2. Afghanistan — 7.8% 3. Kuwait — 11.5% 4. Congo (Dem. Rep.) — 15.2% 5. Eswatini — 15.5% 6. Burundi — 15.9% 7. Palestine — 16.4% 8. Russia — 17.8% 9. Botswana — 18.2% 10. Estonia — 18.2%
    9
  3454. China's hypersonic missile are capable of reaching speeds of over 11,000 kilometers per hour, to deliver nuclear weapons bypassing even the most complex of missile defense systems, such as US THAAD system, and enable China to hit targets anywhere in the world within just an hour. Source:rt.com/news/341172-hypersonic-missile-test-china/
    9
  3455.  @fars7346  Philippines maritime boundary is drawn up in the 1898 Treaty of Paris, which DOES NOT include the South China Sea Islands as within Philippines territory. (Source: Wikipedia: File: Ph boundary in Treaty of Paris 1898)
    9
  3456. forbidmyname Nobody says China has to think in terms of expanding to other countries. China has the world's largest internet market, by number of internet users, and China is world's largest by vehicle production. That's why foreign companies constantly want a share of China's markets all the time. China's economy is export based, and although countries have threatened to impose taxes on Chinese goods (and even boycott Chinese goods altogether) the demand for Chinese goods remains high, and the other country's governments can't afford to risk a backlash by cutting off people's access to Chinese goods entirely. The world economy today is so interconnected, such that if China suffers a recession, then the rest of the world will be affected because of their dependence on Chinese goods.
    9
  3457. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    9
  3458.  @bbj7383  You said: "… you guys broke away and started your own country thanks to Mao." Look, the United Nations countries democratically voted to kick Republic of China 🇹🇼 out of the UN Security Council and to recognise People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 as China. The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the UN General Assembly Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The poll results were as follows: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting …… Source: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_2758 Since PRC won the vote with two-thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, recognized the People's Republic of China (PRC) as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed the collective representatives of Chiang Kai-shek from the United Nations. In short, the UN countries democratically voted to recognise PRC as China and to kick Taiwan out of the UN Security Council.
    9
  3459.  @dziku2222  "That's how the confronation of the authoritarian regime and democracy usually looks like, the first is doing whatever it wants and the other one is bound by it's laws and ethics," If that's the case, then why is the United States not bound by the UN Charter, and can invade Afghanistan, Iraq, etc without consequence? Even when Nicaragua lodged a complaint to the International Court of Justice, the U.S withdrew from compulsory jurisdiction in 1986 to accept the court's jurisdiction only on a case-by-case basis. How's that a democracy being bound by laws and ethics?
    9
  3460.  @learning7140  You said: "The problem is the sanctions are designed to work long-term," Sanctions simply don't work, whether long-term or short-term. Look at countries under long-term sanction by the United States, such as Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, etc, and they haven't succeeded in their intended objective to topple their respective governments.
    9
  3461.  @barrieroberts75  Agreed. When they colonize a territory, they also do the same to the minds of its local inhabitants. This "colonial mentality" extends to many of the local people living in former colonies like Hong Kong, India, The Philippines, and so on. Even after the colonialists leave, the local people's minds remain colonized, and they continue to worsship Anglo-Saxon culture, while harboring a disdain for their own culture.
    9
  3462. Previously, the Saudi Arabian Prince killed a journalist (Khashoggi) and Trump had stood in support of the Saudi Prince, calling the journalist "an enemy of the state". Even after Trump, the new Biden Administration is reluctant to call out the Saudi prince's actions. Seems like USA has double standards pertaining to criticizing the monarchy in Saudi Arabia and in Thailand.
    9
  3463.  @aiolosdaftsis  The Hong Kong Extradition Bill was proposed because a Hong Kongers (named Chan) had committed murder while in Taiwan, but flew back to Hong Kong before the Taiwan authorities discovered the body. Chan has since admitted to his crime, and the Taiwanese authorities wanted to extradite him to Taipei to face justice, but Hong Kong discovered it had no existing extradition law. Since the crime occurred overseas, Hong Kong courts were unable to convict Chan, so Carrie Lam proposed the extradition bill to cover up this legal loophole.
    9
  3464.  @ameyapotdar461  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China, and then incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors also incorporated Tibet into China centuries later during the Qing Dynasty. Tibet briefly broke free of China in 1912 but has been reunified with the mainland by 1952.
    9
  3465.  @dowels8749  There are multiple ways to transcribe Chinese characters into English. Both Mao Zedong and Mao Tse Tung are acceptable. Just like Qingdao is also called Tsingtao.
    9
  3466.  @Tabula_Rasa1  It's not that you can't mix silicon chip with photonic chip. From what I understand, there are companies that are pursuing research on imbuing silicon chips with photonic properties (i.e silicon photonics). Just like how there are EVs and ICE cars as well as hybrid cars existing concurrently.
    9
  3467.  @MarkYeung1  Good news! Xi'an now has the virus outbreak under control as COVID cases fell to their lowest level in weeks. Authorities in Xi'an are now easing the lockdown restrictions either partially or completely lifted in communities designated as lower risk, allowing people to leave their homes for a limited time to purchase daily necessities.
    9
  3468.  @MarkYeung1  Ukraine has defaulted on its debts, so it seems Ukraine is indeed crushed, just like what Douglas Macgregor predicted.
    9
  3469. There's actually a term, gerontocracy, that describes a country run by old people.
    9
  3470. Many Filipinos tend to have the "colonial mentality", which is an internalized perception among Filipinos that the culture, language and values of the colonizer are inherently superior over that of other cultures (including their own). Even after Philippines was granted independence, the minds of its people remain enslaved and loyal towards their former masters. Mental shackles remain, even if the physical shackles are broken.
    9
  3471.  @ShuCarolina  Chinese leaders have made numerous 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc. Here's a sampling of China's long term plans, but this is list is non-exhaustive 2025: China aims to move away from producing cheap low-tech goods and upgrade the manufacturing capabilities of Chinese industries. 2030: China aims to set forth a possible development path for China that would result in attainment of the status of a "rich country" by 2030. China's Long March 9 craft should be ready for us by 2030, capable of carrying over 100 tons, making it suitable for crewed expeditions to the moon or autonomous trips to Mars. 2035: China aims to create a blueprint for the Chinese government and leading tech companies to set global standards for emerging technologies, such as 5G, Internet of Things (IoT), and artificial intelligence (AI). China aims to make all of its space launch vehicles reusable. 2045: China aims to build a "space elevator" that would lower the cost of sending equipment to space. 2050: China aims to fully surpass the United States both economically as well as militarily by this point.
    9
  3472.  Karen Xitler  So what are the occupations of the two Michaels, compared to Meng Wanzhou, whom everyone knows is the Huawei CFO?
    9
  3473. Joshua Wong is one of those Hong Kongers who's mind has been mentally colonized (as a result of Hong Kong being a former British colony) and remains loyal to his former colonial masters.
    9
  3474. My favorite go-to speakers for knowledge about geopolitics are Martin Jacques, Kishore Mabubani, Zhang Weiwei and Eric Li.
    9
  3475. Maybe its because U.S Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only make short-term plans for America's future, instead of long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. Whereas China has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plan, etc, to chart China's course for 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. And our leaders can remain in power long-term to see their plans bloom and come to fruition.
    9
  3476.  @joshlewis575  "Oh how bout the electricity that runs it all, American contribution. The computer you're using, American invention." The first electrochemical battery was invented by Italian Alessandro Volta. The electric motor was demonstrated by English scientist Michael Faraday. In 1827, Hungarian physicist Ányos Jedlik started experimenting with electromagnetic coils. The first DC electric motor capable of turning machinery was invented by English scientist William Sturgeon in 1832. Charles Babbage was an English mathematician and inventor who is credited with having conceived the first automatic digital computer.
    9
  3477.  @masnur7007  Yes, Vietnam invaded Laos too.
    9
  3478. Not only are Russian made weapons less costly, but they also tend to be rugged, easy to maintain and reliable out in the field. That's one reason behind the longevity of the Russian designs of the AK series rifles and RPG launchers, which are still much in use today.
    9
  3479.  @benswimmin2672  Australia has the rather unflattering nickname of "America's Deputy Sheriff in Asia", and the AUKUS deal confirms this.
    9
  3480.  fnewler  Source: Huawei's chip unit overtakes Qualcomm as China's top semiconductor player for the first time cnbc.com/2020/04/29/huawei-reportedly-overtakes-qualcomm-as-chinas-top-semiconductor-player.html
    9
  3481. Watch on CGTN, China's Ministry Of Foreign Affairs showing that BBC is NOT trusted even in the UK!
    9
  3482. Russia-Ukraine conflict is more than just over living space. Historically, the territory of Ukraine was ruled by a variety of external powers including Austria, Ottoman Empire, Tsardom of Russia and the Soviet Union. Ukraine's modern territory was historically Russian territory that was given to them by the Bolsheviks during the Soviet Union. During the USSR period, many Russians travelled all over the Soviet States (especially Ukraine) to work on Soviet projects. But in 1990, the USSR collapse and many Russians suddenly found themselves trapped outside of Russia.
    9
  3483.  @andrenogueira5058  "Other than Chinese debt, the remainder comes with scrutiny and guarantees of good-governance. These lenders take great care in ensuring debt is sustainable, used for good purposes." If those lenders really took care in ensuring the debt is sustainable, then why did Sri Lanka borrowed more money from market borrowings (39%), Asian Development Bank (14%), Japan (12%), World Bank (11%) THAN China (10%)? Shouldn't they hold a smaller percentage of Sri Lanka's debt than China's 10% if they were really into ensuring the debt is sustainable?
    9
  3484.  @rickoffee  Well said. As electric car technology matures, the oil saved could be put to other uses that do not require its use as fuel.
    9
  3485.  @ryanwalters6184  "We are talking about LAND!" Who said anything about land? My post is about foreigners buying property, not land.
    9
  3486. 我们要继续努力，为中国创造跟美好的未来。🇨🇳 We must continue our efforts to build a better future for China. 🇨🇳
    9
  3487. Samsung and Apple aren't under sanction unlike Huawei. Yet Huawei has managed to produce 7nm chip
    9
  3488.  Gazi Lazlo  The Chinese government is providing free education to Uighur extremists and skills training to prepare them for the work force. Don't American kids also learn English at school, American history and sing patriotic songs to cultivate a sense of belonging to America? Even the Native Americans? So why can't Chinese government teach Uighurs Mandarin Chinese, and to sing patriotic songs about China? Xinjang is part of China after all.
    9
  3489.  @christianmarriott3696  Socially, Americans have never been more divided than they are today. The increase in freedom of speech isn't accompanied by an increase in taking responsibility. Almost every issue is polarised and rights are over-inflated and conflict with those with different views. The rights of anti-immigration clash with those pro-immigration. Those of religious people clash with the non-religious. LGBT versus homophobic. Vaccinated people vs anti-vaxxers. Those wanting to defund the police vs those who don't. Those pro-Trump vs those who are against. The Democrats vs the Republicans. The Left vs the Right. All this division is tearing the US apart from within. Economically, over the last 4 decades in America, the bottom 50% of income groups in America have grown poorer and the income gap in America is increasing. Landlords evict tenants who are unable to pay the rent, increasing poverty and homelessness. Fresh graduates are unable to find jobs, yet they're already shackled by debt and need to pay off their student loan. Politically, the American democratic institutions are failing from within. Many Trump supporters believe that the election was stolen (whether real or perceived) and this displays a distrust in institutions of democracy. Biden's policies like his infrastructure bill face roadblocks in Congress (surprisingly, from his own party, the Democrats) and the U.S global sphere of influence is retreating, as US allies lose trust in the USA putting their own American interests ahead of their allies. Without a doubt, the US is in decline.
    9
  3490. Tibetans today can enjoy modern lifestyle, with cars, roads, running water, electricity and gas in their homes, hospitals and universities, smartphone devices, computers, Internet, WiFi and mobile phone coverage (even in such a remote location like Tibet) all thanks to China. Normally, Tibet is isolated from rest of the world by mountains, but Chinese workers built the Qinghai railway, world's highest altitude railway line, through difficult mountainous terrain and low oxygen conditions, to connect Tibet to the rest of the world.
    9
  3491. There are many accurate records of Three Kingdom Period, such as Records of the Three Kingdoms by Chen Shou which is more historical than fantastical. This game appears to follow the popular novel Romance of Three Kingoms rather than the actual historical record.
    9
  3492. It was a civil war so of course Chinese killed Chinese. Just like in American Civil War, where Americans killed Americans
    9
  3493.  @roluevasreisa5730  Agreed. Simu Liu is dishonoring other (dare I say) much better Asian male actors before him, like Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Donnie Yen, Chow Yun Fatt, among others. He's acting like the Asian pioneers of Hollywood don't exist, that Simu Liu considers himself the first Asian pioneer.
    9
  3494.  @everythingandmore5537  USA supported Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge in Kampuchea (Cambodia). Also how is the communist model in China responsible for the pandemic deaths? China's Covid-19 response is to sacrifice businesses to save lives. Whereas capitalist America's Covid-19 response is to sacrifice lives to save businesses. Because capitalism is all about maximising profits, so how has the communist model failed?
    9
  3495. Western media calling attention to Xinjiang and Tibet have actually increased tourism to these parts of China. More people are visiting these regions and showing off how the quality of life has increased for people in these regions.
    9
  3496.  @libra6492  Why would Russia go through great lengths to avoid civilian casualties only to jeopardise it with this attack on Kramatorsk? Why would they use the Soviet era Tockcha U missle when they have the more advanced Iskander missile? And why would they put a Russian message on the missile to incriminate themselves?
    9
  3497.  @libra6492  Russia is clearly going through great lengths to avoid civilian casualties, else they would have simply deployed their superior firepower to level Ukrainian cities (much like what USA did during the Iraq War, Afghan War, etc). So why would Russia jeopardize it all by incriminating themselves in Kramatorsk?
    9
  3498. The 2019 Chinese animated movie Ne Zha (哪吒之魔童降世 'Birth of the demon child Nezha') became the worldwide highest-grossing non-U.S. animated film, and the second worldwide highest-grossing non-English-language film of all time at the time of its release.
    9
  3499.  @Sp3ll633  China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions.
    9
  3500.  @MarkYeung1  Another point to note is that is 100 percent possible to access TikTok (not Douyin) while in China. However, if you merge the 2 companies, it means that the Chinese government will now have control over Tik Tok and this will give the US Congress the reason to ban this app. By separating the companies, it will permit Tik Tok to set up overseas servers on USA to protect its users data.
    9
  3501. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    9
  3502.  @lindigregory119  You said: "Show me where the Chinese PEOPLES choice fits into this model." Elections in China are based on a hierarchical electoral system, whereby local People's Congresses are directly elected. All higher levels of People's Congresses up to the National People's Congress (NPC), the national legislature, are indirectly elected by the People's Congress of the level immediately below. Governors, mayors, and heads of counties, districts, townships and towns are in turn elected by the respective local People's Congresses. The President and the State Council are elected by the National People's Congress, which is made of 2981 people.
    9
  3503.  @ChiefCabioch  What makes you think Chinese people don't know what freedom is? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Before 2019, everyone has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your lands and spending coin on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded by Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE are expanding overseas, and Chinese investors are buying up property in other countries. So what makes you think Chinese aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the world since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    9
  3504.  @ChiefCabioch  Your question was "can you own weapons?" and I have answered it succinctly. You never specified the type of weapons, how would I know what you were talking about? I could also say that bullets don't stop a nuke so what's the point of your argument?
    9
  3505. +Nitin Rawat The "Made in Japan" label used to have a poor reputation too in the past, but over the years, their quality has built to the point today. Even India's Narendra Modi is planning for a "Made in India" label for his country one day. Also, there are many Chinese ethnic enclaves located near major cities all over the world, where people can enjoy Chinese culture and cuisine. These Chinese enclaves are commonly known as "Chinatowns"
    9
  3506.  @jellybeanABCDE  If you lose money today, you can always earn it back later. But once those elderly people lose their lives, no amount of money can buy back those lives that have been lost.
    9
  3507. ​ @weicai-pagan616  The name of the party in Chinese is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where Zhōngguó (中国) means China. So it should be the CPC, not the CCP.
    9
  3508. A Surprising Map of the World Shows Just How Big China's Population Is theatlantic.com/china/archive/2013/08/a-surprising-map-of-the-world-shows-just-how-big-chinas-population-is/278691/ The population of China is equivalent to the population of North America (USA, Mexico, Canada) + South America (Brazil, Columbia, etc) Australia + New Zealand + all of Western Europe (Germany, France, UK, etc) all combined
    9
  3509. If Philippines wants to go to war, then Philippines should be brave and use their own forces, troops, equipment, etc, instead of calling allies for help and dragging its allies into its territorial wars.
    9
  3510.  @koblongata  But Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine, so why is Mao being labelled as a mass murderer by Western scholars? The "intent to kill" wasn't even there in Mao's actions.
    9
  3511.  @koblongata  "Stop blaming the local governments. That's so immature." The local provincial governments lied to Mao about crop yields, they grossly inflate the crop figures as well as transplanting stalks from dying fields to healthy fields when Mao visited them, giving the appearance of a "bumper harvest" so Mao thought there was a surplus of crops and could export the surplus grain to the Soviet Union to pay for the agricultural machines imported from them. So how can you blame Mao when it was the local governments that inflated the crop figures?
    9
  3512.  @koblongata  "神州 Shenzhou Whatever you say about Tibet or Xinjiang isn't real, because there is no independent media in China, without it, nothing can be real." People have visited Tibet and Xinjiang and the quality of life in those regions have improved. For example, there's this video on YouTube entitled: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like! (By WildFilmsIndia) and you can see how developed Lhasa has become under communist party rule. Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, and modern technology like cars, telephone cables, computers, smartphones, WiFi, the Internet, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Even the poorest Tibetan farmer can afford a smartphone, connect to the Internet and shop online in Taobao and have his purchases shipped all the way to Tibet in the Himalayas. Because Tibet is part of China after all.
    9
  3513. The people of Taiwan need to realize that the United States doesn't really care about Taiwan, as long as USA can use Taiwan as a pawn to contain the mainland's rise.
    9
  3514. 俄乌之战，目前听到最简单、最精辟之语: 美国点火💣 俄罗斯开火💥 乌克兰着火🔥 印度观火🌋 中国大陆降火❤‍🔥 台湾玩火♨ The Russo-Ukraine Conflict, explained in the most simplest and incisive words: America lit the fire Russia started the fire Ukraine caught fire India looking at the fire Mainland China putting down the fire Taiwan is playing with fire
    9
  3515.  Joel Turley  Ask Canada to release Meng Wanzhou first if you want the two Canadians to be released. Canada started this whole mess, they know what to do if they want to end this.
    9
  3516.  @danielcockerill3761  China has lifted 700 million people out of poverty by international standards in just 40 years, whereas the whole rest of the world only lifted 150 million by comparison. Video: Historical achievement: Take 700 million out of poverty youtu.be/CljWffPgmG8 "China has lifted 728 million people out of poverty by international standards. The whole rest of the world has only lifted 152 million." - John Ross, Well-known columnist in UK, Former Deputy mayor of London. As long as the government is able to deliver and sustain economic growth, then many Chinese continue to be support the Communist Party of China.
    9
  3517.  @K1999-2  Why don't you Indians resolve your border dispute with Nepal instead of starting another with China? Video: India-Nepal Border Dispute| ‘Won’t Accept Artificial Enlargement of Territorial Claims': MEA youtu.be/9VmxZOn8Y7o
    9
  3518.  Moonland Almond  "East Turkestan" is a fake name coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists (including Nikita Bichurin) to replace the common Western term for the region, Chinese Turkestan. There was no such country historically, it is merely an attempt to separate actual Chinese territory away from the mainland. Also, I've literally cited statistics that show that the population of Uighurs in China nearly quadrupled from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020, yet you can't refute my point? Then what is the population of Uighurs in China you tell me, if you dispute my sources?
    9
  3519. China is not altogether isolated from the rest of the world. World events have shaped China, and China has also shaped world events.
    9
  3520.  @honolulu7793  America's policy is to attract immigrants and foreign talent from across the world to its research centres in the USA, that's how USA maintains their competitive edge. Some examples of America's foreign talent include Albert Einstein (German) and Elon Musk (South African). By cutting off foreign talent, America risks losing it's competitive edge over China. China's advantage is in sheer volume of brainpower and the ability to channel that brainpower to productive means.
    9
  3521.  @joebloe1401  Is that so? Cyrus' videos have the underlying message of "Building Bridges, not Walls" then are you saying that Chinese are promoting this positive message?
    9
  3522. The difference is that Jason's Living in China shows the life of people in China, while Cyrus' videos tend to be more about doing business with China.
    9
  3523.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Surveys showed that the views among Americans toward China were generally positive until Xi Junping took over." According to 2014 Diplomat article, President Xi Jinping was the most popular president, both domestic and abroad.
    9
  3524.  @linglw6592  If Zelenskyy truly cared about the lives of Ukrainians, he would surrender Ukraine in order to minimise the civilian casualties. It's apparent by now that Ukraine has been "abandoned by the West" (Zelenskyy's own words). NATO and USA will not be sending troops to defend Ukraine. Ukraine's application to join NATO is unlikely to be successful, since it would mean NATO is obliged to send reinforcements to defend NATO, if Ukraine was a member, so I just can't see that happening.
    9
  3525.  @INTJ791  I am most certainly not the owner of this Cyrus Janssen channel, yet what makes you think I have the power to censor your comment? Also, you really think Cyrus Jannsen is online right now to be able to censor your comment? Or is it perhaps YouTube that's behind all this?
    9
  3526. ​ @MarkYeung1  Biden truly cared about ending the war, they would be sending humanitarian aid to Ukraine (instead of lethal aid) and they'll be calling for peace talks between Ukraine and Russia. And if Zelenskyy truly cared about the lives of Ukrainians, he would surrender instead of using Ukrainian lives as human shield. By refusing to surrender, Zelenskyy is only prolonging the war. By releasing prisoners and arming civilians with rifles, he's sowing chaos and attempting to maximise civilians casualties. By removing the age restrictions for conscription, Zelenskyy is effectively enlisting child soldiers to fight and die for his refusal to surrender.
    9
  3527.  @MarkYeung1  Has the U.S Military-Industrial Complex profited enough from the Ukraine Crisis?
    9
  3528.  @nedkelly9688  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like USA is a threat to global peace and stability.
    9
  3529.  @shyviking  Russia is playing 4D chess, it's just that you can't see its moves far enough.
    9
  3530.  @wuhaninstituteofvirology  Capitalism is killing the planet, it's the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are too efficient, we can produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, for everyone on the planet! Yet we still have starving people, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking healthcare, because under capitalism, the goods go to whomever can afford them. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." The Earth's resources are finite and capitalism seeks to exhaust them, whereas communism is devoted to allocating resources according to needs.
    9
  3531. Western society was built on the backs of African slavery, causing genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, occupation of their lands, and plundering of resources like gold. Western sciences, mathematics, astronomy, all had their roots in Asia, such as India, and inventions like crossbows and gunpowder actually came from China. Not just weapons alone, but Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, porcelain (precious china) also came through to the West from the East.
    9
  3532. +KH Lee How do you know the next leader after President Xi may be not experienced? Also regarding the use of Artificial Intelligence to control the people, who knows, maybe in future the AI might be so advanced that they can govern countries properly, then if AI proven to be better than humans at governorship, then why not let it guide humanity? About rude Chinese, there are systems like the Social Credit System, that will penalize people's social credit score if they spit in public, smoke in public, jaywalk, jump queues, speed past red lights, and so on. But if they persist with their behaviors, until their scores become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane ticket to fly to other countries and make nuisance of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve. If President Xi hasn't removed the term limits, then he will be forced to step down, and then what happen to all those long term plans? What happen to our 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc? What if the next Chinese president cancel all our previous plans? Look at US Obama administration planned the Trans Pacific Partnership for nearly 8 years, and then President Trump took over and just cancelled the TPP! simply because Trump don't like Obama (Obama humiliated him with his birth cert). All the money put into planing TPP all wasted because of leadership change.
    9
  3533.  @klhilde  At that time, China was suffering from Chinese Civil War, so of course Chinese people were killing Chinese. Just like in American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans. Or Vietnamese killing Vietnamese in Vietnam War. Or Koreans in Korean War or any civil war for that matter. But Mao Zedong unified China and proclaimed the People's Republic of China in 1949 (which the previous Republic of China administration failed to achieve) and thanks to Mao, China is unified today, instead of being fragmented into various provinces.
    9
  3534.  Audio  That's exactly what Western economists been saying all along! 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. But its already 2019, China is still going strong and Western anti-China propaganda been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already!
    9
  3535.  @ankurantil6137  "Nepal has been part of Bharatvarsha, the original name of India..." But India today is NOT the Bharat Varsha of old. Go look up whether Mount Kailash is part of India or not from sources like Trip To Temples and the truth is that Mount of Kailash and Lake Mansarovar were never a part of India.
    9
  3536.  @AmbietsRato  "Reunified with the mainland. You mean forcefully reunified." How so? You said: "The agreement was signed on May 23, 1951, and the Chinese People's Liberation Army entered Tibet in October of the same year". That means that the PLA only entered Tibet AFTER the agreement was signed, so how is it forced?
    9
  3537.  @Gobsmacked52  You said: "While government ignores the will of the people, if it goes too far they can be voted out." But even if they are voted out, the next party or candidate doesn't seem to deliver what they promised to do if they get elected. For example, Trump didn't build the wall like he promised. Biden said the US withdrawal from Afghanistan will be alright, but look at what happened when US pulled out of Kabul. Even if you claim your system is all you have, if it doesn't appear to be working for you, why not consider alternatives?
    9
  3538. Trump's tariffs aren't going to last forever. Eventually President Trump will have to step down when his term is over, and the next U.S president might just start reversing Trump's policies and lift the trade war, thus restoring US-China trade relations to their previous pre-tradewar levels. President Xi abolished the term limits, so he'll be able to guide China into the future, long after Trump's tariffs are gone.
    9
  3539.  @suppeeps5393  U.S President Biden drawing upon U.S oil reserves and releasing them to the market at a rate of one million barrels on the market per day. If the U.S does end up depleting their oil reserves, this will affect their ability to contain Russia and China.
    9
  3540.  @jamilbrugsen1362  Who says that YouTube is forbidden in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    9
  3541. @comment sense On YouTube, you can literally find videos of Westerners boiling lobsters while they are still alive, and serving it as dinner, so what's your point? Animals that are considered livestock for food and prepared a certain way, then who are you to question other cultures perception of food?
    9
  3542. @comment sense Go tell those Western chefs to stop boiling lobsters alive then, if you're so pissed off. It's like you're resorting to verbal insults just because you can't refute my points.
    9
  3543. @comment sense Typing all your text out in capital letters only makes you seem childish and triggered that's all.
    9
  3544. @comment sense The Rabbit is a cute animal often regarded as pets in many Western cultures, yet the British literally have recipes for Rabbit Stew, then are you going to accuse the British of not being human?
    9
  3545. The Japanese Navy's "Rising Sun" Flag (🇯🇵 with additional radial lines)is considered offensive to many Asian countries (at the same level as the Nazi Swastika 卍 in Western countries) yet Japanese Navy still uses that flag even till today.
    9
  3546. You said: "Its China who says that Taiwan is a part of China" but it also has to be noted that under the Taiwan's Republic of China's constitution, Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments, Taiwan is part of China under their constitution.
    9
  3547. Asian Americans suffer from what's called the "perpetual foreigner" stereotype. Even Asian Americans born and bred in USA, they are often regarded as foreigners in USA and have been told to "Go back to China!"
    9
  3548. Hungary is being labelled no longer a full democracy, but a "hybrid regime" according to EU parliament members (who are themselves not elected)
    9
  3549.  @c.c.4597  Exactly, the Bangladeshi government even install barbed wire fences around 11 of their refugee camps to prevent the refugees from getting embroiled in violence and criminal activities with Bangladeshi citizens. Source: Government to set up barbed wire fences around 11 Rohingya camps dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/2017/10/30/government-to-set-up-barber-wire-fences-around-11-rohingya-camps/
    9
  3550.  @daeric7572  What has my boss even got to do with this conversation? I don't ask you about your boss.
    9
  3551.  @thenutbrothers8726  Kids should be in school studying, and since the kindergarten house a lot of children, security measures like barbed wire, are necessary in order to prevent trespassers and kidnappers from harming the kids or abducting them from the premises. As for DNA sampling, the Uighurs are health screened for any serious communicable diseases, since they will be living in a community, thus blood samples are needed to test for any undeclared diseases the Uighurs may be harboring.
    9
  3552.  @TheBucketSkill  I've never seen you before, and all I am doing is stating my own opinion. You as American can always call out your government on tons of things, then why can't I point out the positives about China? So many people know only the negative things about China, because Western media is biased against China, so I see nothing wrong with pointing out some of China's achievements. And who says I don't talk about Chinese culture or Chinese people?
    9
  3553.  @canhaktan9674  The journalists only get approached by police because they are purposely acting suspicious in order to draw the attention of police to come question then. They cut out all the footage with no policemen in them and only film the policemen patrols when then encounter them, to make it seem like Xinjiang is police state. They also do most of their filming at checkpoints in Xinjiang, so of course there will be policemen at checkpoints for security purposes.
    9
  3554.  @ikhsanhasbi657  You think Indonesian government is any better? Suharto banned expressions of Chinese culture through language, religion, and traditional festivals and the ethnic Chinese were pressured to adopt Indonesian-sounding names. Look at what your country (world's largest Muslim population country) did to Chinese in your country. You want to complain about how Muslims are treated in China, when Chinese are treated worst in Islamic country like Indonesia?
    9
  3555.  @cx9882  "神州 Shenzhou by killing civillians" The Iraq Body Count Project reported some 183,669 – 206,273 civilian deaths since the U.S led invasion of Iraq, on suspicion of harboring WMDs. Till to date, no WMDs have ever been found and recovered from Iraq.
    9
  3556.  @L98fiero  Ads are necessary in Cyrus case, because we can't have those naysayers claiming that Cyrus is being paid by China.
    9
  3557.  @koblongata  "Save those women first, and there are still 5 billion Chinese people living under the poverty line." The United States created that mess in Afghanistan, why should China clean up the U.S mess? And how can there be 5 billion Chinese people living under the poverty line when there are only 1.4 billion Chinese on the globe? I thought you have access to information yet you can't even get your info straight?
    9
  3558.  @jon_nomad  I agree with you. I repeated this same experiment in Hong Kong and gotten similar results. Some Hong Kong people (not all) treated me coldly when I spoke Mandarin, but when I switched to speaking English, many started welcoming me warmly. Colonial mentality does exist (to a certain degree) in both Singapore and Hong Kong, due to their status as former British colonies.
    9
  3559.  @vishalgiraddi5357  That means that other countries might experience a spike too, when they eventually lift the lockdown. China is actually a experimental ground for what happens when lockdowns are lifted
    9
  3560. Sometimes, the parents are unable to control children's access to harmful Internet content, because the older generations of Chinese may not be as IT savvy as the younger generation. If parental control is insufficient, then the government needs to step in.
    9
  3561.  @MikeJones69696  The name of the party in Chinese is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where Zhōngguó (中国) means China. So the correct name should be the CPC, not the CCP.
    9
  3562.  @billyehh  "神州 Shenzhou What logic." I was pointing out that even though the average Chinese has less money than the average American, the cost of living in China is (generally) lower than in the United States. Food is cheaper, transportation is cheaper, so is gas and electricity, so even though there's less money, it's probably better spent than what Americans spend on.
    9
  3563.  @catch10110  Polls have indicated that around 80% of Russians support Putin's action in the Russian special military operation, are you sure he's carrying emotional baggage?
    9
  3564.  @宋庆-i4m  Because that's precisely what you said, you asked: "Can gay people in China get married?" and a man and a woman getting married is the normal definition of marriage, so yes, gay people can marry someone of the opposite gender in China. You choose to phrase your question this way then why can't I interpret it that way?
    9
  3565.  @cathywoodward6171  Having most of the U.S troops leave doesn't mean that all of the U.S troops have left. During the shambolic U.S withdrawal from Afghanistan, the Taliban demanded nothing less than the complete departure of all American troops from Afghan soil. Otherwise, as long as U.S boots remain on your territory, they can always call in more American troops.
    9
  3566.  oneviwatara  Since "Laos" (your "Lao" is missing an "s") is not name founded by Laotian people, then likewise "China" is not a name founded by Chinese people so your statement actually supports my point. Chinese call our country zhōngguó 中国 which means "Middle Kingdom". You mean just because a name has two syllables, implies it belongs to Laos? Tai Chi is the Western name for it, and it is known as tàijíquán 太极拳 in Mandarin Chinese. Kung Fu is also the Western name, and in Chinese it is known as wǔshù 武術 or Martial Arts. The world gōngfu 功夫 actually translates to "skilled" or "well-trained" or something to that effect. Ping Pong is actually pīngpāng 乒乓 in Mandarin. Again, English words are unable to fully translate Mandarin sounds sufficiently.
    9
  3567. Russia's military tactics is just like playing Weiqi (围棋 "Go") where the objective of the board game is to to try and surround more territory than your opponent.
    9
  3568.  @LoveWatchingNDEs  China has voted in favor of a Russia-led UN resolution calling for an immediate cease-fire, the release of all hostages and allowing humanitarian aid to enter Gaza. Meanwhile, the US has voted against this resolution, and is sending military aid to Israel.
    9
  3569. Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors whereas, many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly viewing Chinese in their lands with suspicion.
    9
  3570.  @DEvilParsnip  How is China denying the pandemic? If anything, China is one of the few countries left that's adhering to pandemic procedures, whereas it appears that most of the rest of the world has forgotten that we are still in the midst of a pandemic.
    9
  3571.  @DaniboyBR2  The Kuomintang lost the mainland to the CPC and fled to Taiwan island and set up base there, planning to retake all of mainland China someday, then how is that bullying? Both Taipei and Beijing agree to the One China principle that Taiwan is part of China, and even the U.S acknowledges this in the 1972 Shanghai Communique.
    9
  3572.  @trumpisntdoneyet3604  The United States stole German Intellectual Property after WWII. At the start of WWII, American tanks were largely inferior to German tanks, but after Nazi WWII surrender, the Americans absorbed German Panzer (Tank) technology and that's why American tanks are so powerful today. The German Air force (Luftwaffe) had such success aircraft designs that the Americans copied them. Even Nazi V2 Rocket Scientists were put to work by NASA on its Moon landing missions. Source: One of the greatest ripoffs of all time was the US theft of German patents after World War II 456fis.org/GREAT_PATENTS_HEIST.htm
    9
  3573. ​ @prashanthb6521 "You may have money but we are living a better life." China's life expectancy has reached 78.59 years (2022) while India's is 67.74 (2022), China's literacy rate has reached 99.83% while India's is 76.32%, so who exactly is living a better life?
    9
  3574. Yeah, Brian's videos don't even waste time on an intro, he just jumps straight into the issue.
    9
  3575. Andrew Ross said "BTW You are not the master race. You are not superior to other races." Who is the "master race" that colonized the Americas and Australia? Who caused genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, and imported slaves from Africa to labor for them? Even today, isn't USA bombing countries in Middle East, whereas China is peaceful today and not at war with any country since our last major war in 1979. Today, China is contributing greatly to science by publishing more research papers than even USA. China is home to the world's fastest super computer, Sunway TaihuLight 神威·太湖之光 as well as the world's 2nd fastest supercomputer, Tianhe-2 天河-2. In a recent Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500 supercomputers. China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance Source: cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/
    9
  3576.  @Winters777  Oil thieves? The maritime boundaries of the Philippines was drawn up in the 1898 Treaty of Paris and they DO NOT include the South China Sea as within Philippine territory. (Source: Wikipedia: File: Ph boundary in Treaty of Paris 1898)
    9
  3577.  @SwedeenXBL  You said: "No clue, i'm speculating because I have no clue why they wanted to invade Georgia or Checnya so I wouldn't put it past them." Even a 2008 report by the European Union stated that Georgia started the war with Russia when it attacked Tskhinvali (in South Ossetia) with heavy artillery on the night of 7 to 8 August 2008.
    9
  3578. In a poll of nearly 7500 readers by the United Daily News (Taiwan Newspaper) website, 61 percent said the trip was not welcome as it may destabilise the Taiwan Strait. Only 38 percent welcomed the visit and said it had more advantages than disadvantages.
    9
  3579. ​ @ycyc6619  "Sanctioning Russia is simply because they are afraid of becoming like Ukraine." Singapore is so far away from Russia, yet Singapore is afraid of becoming like Ukraine? Singapore's actions actually made Russia notice it, and added Singapore to its list of unfriendly nations.
    9
  3580. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.amp.html
    9
  3581. Americans can afford to pay developers higher because their government can just print more dollars (which is based off nothing) with impunity. But if Russia and China succeed in creating an alternative digital currency (tied to real commodities like gold and so on) then just perhaps those developers might consider coming to our countries.
    9
  3582.  @oliverbanes5121  The question shouldn't be what has China done for Canada, it should be what has China done to offend Canada?
    9
  3583. China doesn't want war too but we will defend our lands if India thinks it can just enter other countries territory like Doklam and occupy it for months.
    9
  3584. Those robots still require maintenance and servicing, which to my knowledge, still requires on human personnel.
    9
  3585. NED represents the United State's Need for Exerting Dominance on other countries' internal affairs.
    9
  3586. It seems that even though there are over 20 comments here (at the moment), only a handful are showing up in the comment section.
    9
  3587.  @MarkYeung1  According to surveys in Russia, around 83% of Russians polled support Putin's actions as the President of the Russian Federation, so this seems to indicate that Putin is for the people after all.
    9
  3588.  @GabrielEddy  Regarding the "Tankman" photo, it turns out that the photo was taken on June 5th – more than 24 hours after the students had peacefully left Tiananmen Square. Also, the line of tanks were actually driving out of Tiananmen Square, not into it, and actually driving eastwards on Chang’an avenue and exiting the city.
    9
  3589. In Dec 2011, London’s Daily Mail reported that the Zhengzhou New Area 郑州市 was China’s largest “Ghost City. But today Zhengzhou has a population of 9,378,000 inhabitants, and had a GDP of 913 billion in 2017. It just means that time is needed for people to migrate from rural countryside to the cities. If you don't believe me, then you can watch this beautiful and artistic video of Zhengzhou (Suggestion: Watch in HD for best experience) Video: 《Hello, ZHENGZHOU 》(by YaoKing) youtube.com/watch?v=jFdLkgDS-QE&t=8
    9
  3590.  @hyc1266  Blaming Trump for America's woes is somewhat disingenuous. He's a symptom of many Americans' growing dissatisfaction, not it's cause. Cyrus claims the media is dividing Americans, but by claiming Trump's election is probably the "worst thing to happen to this country", isn't Cyrus also alienating those Americans who voted for Trump?
    9
  3591. @Bryan Tadeo Incompetence has been punished by sacking and replacing them. But look at the worsening Covid-19 situation in USA and President Trump has shown incompetence by consistently downplaying the coronavirus in the early stages.
    9
  3592.  Lily Wang  said "CCP traitors robbed the Chinese county with Russian’s help" Didn't Dr. Sun Yatsen also overthrew the Qing Dynasty government in 1911 and established Republic of China? Isn't that robbing the Qing dynasty of China too? Then why can't CCP take mainland China from the Kuomintang's hands then?
    9
  3593. Hey Kim, finally going to meet with Trump in Singapore? Good luck with that meeting.
    9
  3594. +Red Guard Massacre and rape of civilians is driven by the soldier's own emotions, which is beyond the control of leaders. I mean, although Japanese PM Shinzo Abe is nationalist, how can you blame him for Japanese soldiers raping Chinese women? What sort of twisted logic are you applying here?
    9
  3595.  @Tespri  You're saying that the Russian government hasn't reprimanded the news anchor? Could you tell me what's the name of this news anchor? And since you said Putin has said this several times in his speech, could you quote me one of his speeches before 24th Feb 2022 that hints at this?
    9
  3596.  @xerozero976  China has allocated some 1.155 billion yuan (about 165 million U.S. dollars) in flood relief funds in regions hits by floods. Since the start of the flood season, China has allocated central budgetary funds for disaster relief totaling 1.155 billion yuan (about 165 million U.S. dollars) for regions hit by floods, Zheng Guoguang, vice head of the Ministry of Emergency Management (MEM), told a press conference on Monday. Source: China Focus: China increases disaster relief funds amid floods xinhuanet.com/english/2020-07/13/c_139209865.htm To help flood-hit regions overcome difficulties, the country has established a mechanism to allocate natural disaster relief funds from the central budget more quickly and efficiently, according to a circular, jointly released by the Ministry of Finance (MOF) and the MEM on Tuesday. A new practice is that local authorities in flood-hit areas can apply for part of the budgetary disaster relief funds before the tallying of disaster losses is completed.
    9
  3597.  @mandarinandthetenrings2201  Why is the US so angry with Saudi Arabia about oil supply cuts?
    9
  3598.  @fl338  "神州 Shenzhou The US also has Freedom of Speech and the Press. With independent courts to protect those rights." So when the U.S drone strike in Kabul killed 10 Afghan civilians (including women and children) then why the U.S General responsible for ordering the strike got away scot-free? Even worst, the Pentagon said that the U.S drone strike in Afhganistan did not violate any laws, so is this the kind of "rule of law" you are talking about? Where the U.S General can just drone strike civilians and get away without serious consequences?
    9
  3599. @Karen Xitler Hong Kong has already been freed of the Hong Kong rioters after the National Security Law was introduced.
    9
  3600.  @MarkYeung1  Hong Kong Police Force was originally under the British government, but after the 1997 handover, HKPF no longer answers to the British (as it should be). The most important thing is that Mr. John Lee is loyal to China. He's been approved by the central people's government (in accordance with Basic Law Article 45). The problem is that some overseas Chinese and some people from Hong Kong still retain the colonial mentality, and their loyalties are questionable.
    9
  3601.  @Chris-rs4so  New Zealand themselves follow a zero Covid policy (they entered lockdown after detecting 1 Covid case). Yet NZ cite Covid concerns as the reason to not send diplomats to the Olympics, even though China has the same zero covid policy.
    9
  3602.  @eycoregamer7143  Agreed. Singapore's copied their MRT system from Hong Kong's MTR system and just rearranged the letters around.
    9
  3603. In a poll of nearly 7500 readers by the United Daily News website, 61 percent said the trip was “not welcome” as it “may destabilise the Taiwan Strait”. Only 38 percent welcomed the visit and said it had “more advantages than disadvantages”.
    9
  3604.  @rider2731  Falun Dafa is just like those Q-Anon cultists who stormed Capitol Hill. Only worst.
    9
  3605. I found it hilarious that Joe Biden is willing to sacrifice Germany's interests by cutting off Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline supplying Germany with Russia gas, if Russia makes a move on Ukraine. Now the news is in that Germany willingly suspended Nord Stream 2, they are literally playing into the hands of the Americans.
    9
  3606. China had a chance to create colonies during Ming dynasty in 15th century, when Zheng He led seven far-reaching ocean voyages to the coastal territories and islands, such as India, Arabia, and even East Africa, and was pre-eminent naval power by projecting sea-power further to the south and west. The Chinese armada was massive and each ship was about 4-5 times the size of Columbus' Santa Maria, but ultimately it was merchant convoy, meant to increase trade with other countries instead. In other words, China had the opportunity to colonize other countries in 15h century, but chose to trade peacefully instead, exchanging gifts like silk, tea and porcelain (precious china) in return for exotic animals. Had China been truly expansionist back then, it would have created colonies in those countries, just like Western colonialism did in 17th century.
    9
  3607.  @americathebeautiful781  You said: "China intentionally infected the entire world, there are now almost 5 million dead. China is the enemy of the world. " How? China locked down Wuhan and stopped all international flights coming out of Wuhan (except for chartered flights) so how did China intentionally infected the entire world? In fact, it was China who reported the appearance of a mysterious pneumonia-like illness to the World Health Organization on 31th December 2019, why would China do that if China wanted to intentionally infect the entire world?
    9
  3608. Unfortunately, Singapore is the only ASEAN country to have imposed sanctions on Russia, earning Singapore a place on Russia's list of unfriendly countries.
    9
  3609.  @jabertagi3857  The Uighurs had their own vibrant culture, but were forceful converted to Islam by the Islamic invaders who conquered Xinjiang. And those Uighur women appear to be smiling happily and posing in their tradition Uighur garb, so who's forcing who? Why do you want to cover up Uighur girls natural beauty with the ugly black Muslim headveil?
    9
  3610. Besides "Yellow Peril" the Western MSM is also painting China negatively through "Red Scare" a fear of a potential rise of communism. The combination of "Yellow Peril" and "Red Scare" makes a cocktail of fear that feeds off the paranoia of Westerners.
    9
  3611. Russia, China and Iran are great old civilizations, while USA is a young country in comparison.
    9
  3612. Chieftaincy sounds similar to traditional Confucianism, where the ruler behaves like a parent and rules the country benevolently, and in return, his/her subjects are expected to grant their loyalty to him/her.
    9
  3613. Britain was undisputed colonial power in 19th century, but has since been overtaken by America in 20th century. But prior to that, China had been economic superpower for over 1700 years prior to Britain, and our GDP made up over 25% of world's GDP according to world leading British economist, Angus Maddison. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA_Middle_East.png And its looks as though China is set to dominate the 21st century, if you follow the trend above. China is merely returning to our previous position as a world superpower before the rise of the West.
    9
  3614.  china is in decline  Haven't you heard of China's 12-point peace process for Ukraine?
    9
  3615. When China invented the paper banknote, the rest of the world soon followed with their own paper currency. Now China is rolling out digital Yuan, eventually the rest of the world will follow with their own digital currency. History has shown this to be true.
    9
  3616.  @1SmokingLizard  Karate was invented as a means of self-defense.
    9
  3617.  @dennisliu123  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, the United States poses a threat to global peace and stability, and that's why they don't want to see China rise peacefully.
    9
  3618. Nancy Pelosi is like the modern day Helen of Troy, except it's her visit that launched a thousand ships, certainly not her face.
    9
  3619. In a poll of nearly 7500 readers by the United Daily News (Taiwan Newspaper) website, 61 percent said the trip was not welcome as it may destabilise the Taiwan Strait. Only 38 percent welcomed the visit and said it had more advantages than disadvantages.
    9
  3620. Their strategy isn't working though. Attrition warfare is about buying time to make yourself stronger, while the other side grows weaker over time. However, it's the US that is in decline, while China is growing stronger.
    9
  3621. Many Western expats in China have remarked that traveling back to their home countries is kinda like traveling back in time to a less technologically developed country.
    9
  3622.  @Sk-po9dx  To his credit, Trump did not start any new U.S wars during his term as U.S President, unlike Obama and Bush before him.
    9
  3623. @WN WN About Religion in China, China has nearly 200 million religious believers and more than 380,000 clerical personnel. The 5 major religions practiced in China are Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism, and Protestantism. China has over 20 million Muslims, more than 57,000 clerical personnel. There are around 222,000 Buddhist clerical personnel and over 40,000 Taoist clerical personnel. Catholicism and Protestantism have 6 million and 38 million followers in China, respectively, with 8,000 and 57,000 clerical personnel. There are approximately 5,500 religious groups in China, including seven national organizations which are Buddhist Association of China, Chinese Taoist Association, China Islamic Association, Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association, Bishops’ Conference of Catholic Church in China, National Committee of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement of the Protestant Churches in China, and China Christian Council. At present, there are about 144,000 places of worship registered for religious activities in China, among which are 33,500 Buddhist temples (including 28,000 Han Buddhist temples, 3,800 Tibetan Buddhist lamaseries, and 1,700 Theravada Buddhist temples), 9,000 Taoist temples, 35,000 Islamic mosques, 6,000 Catholic churches and places of assembly spread across 98 dioceses, and 60,000 Protestant churches and places of assembly. Source:nation.com.pk/03-Apr-2018/china-has-over-20-million-muslims-35-000-mosques
    9
  3624.  Snehasish Ghosh  China is facing threats from superpowers like USA, because they don't want to see China succeed and become powerful, that's why Western media paint negative image of China and "demonise" our country. That's why President Trump started trade war with China and unilaterally slapped tariffs on steel and aluminium, without going through the proper WTO channels. When India starts rising too, you can bet that USA is going to take notice.
    9
  3625.  @ne0ge049  "The United States was not defeated." If the attackers failed to achieve their objectives and the defenders succeed, then that is generally known as a defeat. The U.S just lost a 20-year war in Afghanistan against a bunch of insurgents, after pouring trillions into Afghanistan and leaving behind billions of dollars of U.S military equipment in Afghanistan, including Blackhawk Helicopters.
    9
  3626. There are actually many Asians that speak English and tend to have American mentality (i.e American-Born Chinese) yet nobody seems to think that they're the coolest thing in the world.
    9
  3627. -China has world's longest range ICBM, the DF-41, with operational range of 13,000 km to 15,000 km, enabling China to bypass barriers like the seas and the Himalayas, by literally flying over them. -China has demonstrated anti-satellite capabilities in 2007, when a 750 kg satellite in orbit at altitude of 865 km was taken out by a ground launched missile. If PLA takes out Indian Army satellites, their ground troops will be at severe disadvantage without satellite support. -During wartime, China can always manufacture more tanks, aircraft, ammunition and equipment to replace losses. Indian on the other hand, has to rely on purchasing foreign military hardware from USA and Russia, and these countries can suddenly increase the prices, because they know India has no choice but to buy them. -Pakistan's status has never impeded them from being thorn in India's side. -Tibetans are enjoying modern amenities built by China, like roads, houses, schools, universities, hospitals, power stations, running water, gas, electricity, and technology like cars, smartphones, computers, Internet, WiFi, mobile phone coverage, under China. As ethnic minority in China, Tibetans get special exemption from taxes, free education up to university, and special healthcare benefits and bursaries. Why would they want to lose all this?
    9
  3628.  @pumpkinbell3445  Britain choose to give up India, much like Japan relinquished all their previously occupied territory after their WWII surrender. But Tibet was not recognized as an independent country so why should China give up our territory? Even today, countries all over the world recognize Tibet as part of China, since during the UN meetings, no one brings up the issue of Tibetan sovereignty.
    9
  3629. Japanese automakers also copied Western car designs initially. The 1917 Mitsubishi Model A was based on the Fiat A3-3 design. In the 1930s, Nissan Motors' cars were based on the Austin 7 and Graham-Paige designs, while the Toyota AA model was based on the Chrysler Airflow. Ohta built cars in the 1930s based on Ford models, while Chiyoda built a car resembling a 1935 Pontiac, and Sumida built a car similar to a LaSalle.
    9
  3630.  kaisin taika  As a Chinese myself, I had actually wanted Trump to win the 2020 re-election over Biden. While it is true that Trump started this whole US-China Trade War, Trump also did not care about China's internal affairs, like Hong Kong, or Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region, and another 4 more years of Trump would magnify the consequences in America by another 4 more years. The new Biden Administration did not remove Trump's tariffs, and the Biden Administration seems keen to attack China on internal issues like Xinjiang or Hong Kong.
    9
  3631.  @brianplum1825  "What the hell have the Commies ever invented?" Plenty, the Communist Soviet Union invented the world's first artificial satellite, Sputnik-1. They invented the spacesuit for world's first human spaceflight was by Russian Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, and the world's first space station was Soviet Salyut-1.
    9
  3632.  Tom Collins  Just get Canada to put Meng Wanzhou on the first flight back to China if you want China to consider releasing the two Canadians. Canada started this whole stalemate, they know exactly how to end it.
    9
  3633. 我们要继续努力，为中国创造更美好的未来。🇨🇳 We must continue our efforts to build a better future for China. 🇨🇳
    9
  3634. Seems like no matter if your country is big or small, you can be sure that the United States will find ways to sow discord and fund separatist activities in their attempt to divide your country. Even the Solomon Islands is no exception, and hopefully their leaders realize this.
    9
  3635.  @smoochie3331  You said receiving money from China, what's wrong with the Barretts receiving money from China? Some Chinese people donated money to the Barretts' channel so what's wrong with receiving money from China?
    9
  3636. Agreed. It's nigh impossible to find accurate readings of the situation between NATO, Ukraine and Russia. Perhaps the best technique is to look at mainstream misinformation and just take the opposite as true. For example, if Western MSM says Putin is sending more troops to its border with Ukraine, then the reality is that Putin is withdrawing troops from its border.
    9
  3637. Can't Cyrus video give credit to countries where credit is due? Also, why are you asking for his country? What has his nationality even got to do about giving credit to another country?
    9
  3638.  @OpheliaPG  Sadly, some Filipinos (but not all) tend to have the colonial mentality as a result of Philippines being a former American colony. The Americans had promised to grant independence to the Philippines if they would side with them against Spain. But after the American-Spanish war, the Americans did not honor their promise, instead they claimed Philippines for themselves, resulting in the American-Philippines war in which a quarter million Filipinos died.
    9
  3639.  @ShuCarolina  You said: " 神州 Shenzhou attributes success of China to authoritarian rule." Look at India, the world's largest democracy (and 2nd most populous country after China) and India under their government hasn't been successful the way China has under the CPC, then can't I attribute China's success to our system of governance? Thousands of years of Chinese history has shown that China benefited immensely under a strong central government, then can't China continue with a system that apparently works for China? Nobody said that all countries have to adopt Western style democracy to be successful, and China is living proof of this.
    9
  3640.  @MarkYeung1  Yet 70 countries continue to import Bibles that are Made-in-China, so what anti-Christian persecution is there to speak of? In China, the government is above religion, and so long as people don't practice religious doctrine or activities that have been deemed harmful to others or the state, then people are free to practice.
    9
  3641. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    9
  3642. China Observer's channel is full of such videos that depict China in a negative light.
    9
  3643.  Molly Wop Chainsaw  USA has used nuclear bombs twice, but it was against a non-nuclear capable country, Japan, without fear of retaliation. However, during the Cold War, the Soviet Union was nuclear country, which was why USA hesitated to use nukes. Now that China is nuclear power as well, its unlikely that USA will use nukes too, because of mutually assured destruction.
    9
  3644.  @APBpa  Yes, there's shelling in Luhansk and Donetsk by both sides, but it was asymmetrical with up to 80% of civilian deaths occurring in rebel-held territory. The Minsk agreements were meant to stop the fighting in Donbas, facilitate withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line and institute constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas. But the Minsk agreement have been ignored for 8 years and Putin's grievances with NATO expanding eastwards have fallen on deaf ears, which was why Putin decided to act now. You said: "Only when Putin crowned himself king of Eastern Europe, takes Georgia, annexes Crimea and declares Donetsk and Luhansk independent republics." Georgia exists as its own separate country and is not taken by Russia, what are you talking about? As for Crimea, there was a 2014 referendum in which an overwhelming majority (97%) voted to join the Russian Federation. And since Ukraine is uninterested in upholding the Minsk agreement, or listening to the two republics' grievances, and has traded fire and shelling with them (in which over 13,000 people been killed) then Russia has decided to take matters into it's own hands.
    9
  3645.  @richard35791  If you want to look at distances, then why is Hawaii and Guam considered part of the United States, even though Hawaii and Guam are located so far away from the American mainland? Also, the Falkland Islands are closer to Brazil, yet they are considered British territory? Clearly, distance alone is not the only factor when it comes to determining sovereign territory.
    9
  3646. The U.S war machine functions by de-humanizing its perceived enemies to their audiences, in order to manufacture consent for war.
    9
  3647.  @everythingandmore5537  China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. (nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html )
    9
  3648. Pakistan and India been at each other throats for about 70 years already. Why not take the chance to mend the relations between your countries instead? China's policies like CPEC and OBOR offers a rare and golden opportunity for both countries to put aside their differences and work together to repair the broken relations.
    9
  3649.  @MarkYeung1  In 1981, the Communist Party of China declared that the Cultural Revolution was "responsible for the most severe setback and the heaviest losses suffered by the Party, the country, and the people since the founding of the People's Republic." Life in China has since improved drastically, but do the indigenous aboriginals in Canada have access to drinking water since?
    9
  3650. But will those countries tolerate India blocking Chinese trade with those country? India blockade, means Americans and Europeans won't have access to Chinese goods that they so desire and will adversely affect their economies.
    9
  3651. Information space will indeed be a key battleground in 2022 and in the coming years. Your videos are like a lighthouse cutting through the thick fog of war and illuminating the path for souls lost inside this miasma full of misinformation and disinformation.
    9
  3652.  @Neema150  "You are talking like China is doing all that for free. Africa is not poor it does not need Chinese handouts." I've never said China is doing it for free, whatever gave you that idea? I said that China has similar experience as African countries, having suffered at the hands of the West and that China and African cooperation could lead to mutual prosperity.
    9
  3653. It's no secret that words can mislead and incite riots, like Trump's tweets leading to the January 6th Capitol Hill riots in Washington. Until even Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapdragon ban Trump's social media accounts, even though Trump was still technically President of the United States at that time.
    9
  3654.  @PomegranateChocolate  The constitution of the Republic of China also recognizes other territory, but arguably the most relevant point today is the recognition of Taiwan as part of China.
    9
  3655.  @zetristan4525  "Disproportionately flooding Cyrus' video comment sections and live chats," What constitutes a "proportionate" number of comments in your view then? People who stray from your allocated number of posts are deemed as being paid to do so?
    9
  3656.  @zetristan4525  "I respect @Shenzhou and his full free speech," You've insinuated that I am being paid to post comments, how's that a sign of respect?
    9
  3657. While the US troll farm is near-perfect. Everyone seems to believe whatever lies that comes out of their mouths
    9
  3658.  @ryanshiflett2178  You said: "Russia had no reason to invade another sovereign country." Ukraine had been supporting ultra-nationalist neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion that's carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Lugansk and Donetsk (collectively known as Donbas). Over the course of 8 years, over 13,000 people have been killed in the Donbas region by shelling by both sides. The Minsk agreement was meant to stop the fighting, include a ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, and facilitate constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas. But the Minsk Agreement was never honored. Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that began since the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukovych by USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Kiev.
    9
  3659.  @perrychrispy1  Why not attempt to refute my points instead?
    9
  3660.  @mhampton8358  China was once a poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, invaded by foreigners such as the British (who took Hong Kong) and also by the Japanese during WWII. Fast forward till today, and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (or world's largest if measured by GDP PPP), the factory of the world (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China.
    9
  3661. If President Trump wants to claim credit for China's efforts, then why didn't Kim Jung Un just visit Washington directly, instead of coming to Beijing? Americans need to face the fact that if not for Beijing, Washington would have no chance of talking with Pyongyang, and the only interaction would be name-calling, slapping sanctions and sending aircraft carriers across the Pacific Ocean that's all.
    9
  3662.  Charles Schmid  Ted Cruz supported the white supremacists during January 6th Capitol Hill riots. In other words, actual fascists. Yet you're accusing China of being Nazi?
    9
  3663. After WW2, there should be no more wars, but USA and Soviet Union had their "cold wars" and fought proxy wars in Vietnam and Korea. After Soviet Union dissolution, there should be no more wars, but USA got involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan war, even till 21st century.
    9
  3664.  @Esquera123  Such arrogance coming from you, claiming China cannot make advanced chips (even though SMIC have demonstrated making comparable advanced chips). Yet Nvidia cannot even manufacture its own chips. Even for the most basic chip, USA has to rely on a company in Taiwan island. Did you know those workers in Taiwan are Chinese? They literally speak Chinese and write Chinese, yet here you are mocking Chinese people, when the US literally has to rely on Chinese people to make chips. The sheer hubris coming from you.
    9
  3665.  @Esquera123  "China has border disputes with a lot of countries." China has 14 land neighbors (the most number of neighbors in the world apart from Russia) yet China has settled border disputes with all but two of them. -In 1962, North Korea and China signed a border treaty. -In 1991, Soviet Union and China signed a border treaty. -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed a border treaty. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed a border treaty. -In 1996, Kyrgyzstan and China signed a border treaty. -In 1999, Tajikistan and China signed a border treaty. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed a border treaty. -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed a border treaty. -In 1960, Nepal and China signed a border treaty. -In 1960, Myanmar and China signed a border treaty. -In 1992, Laos and China signed a border treaty. -In 1999, Vietnam and China signed a border treaty. ... Only India and Bhutan have yet to sign a border treaty with China. China has had 30 rounds of border talks with India, and 25 rounds of border talks with Bhutan, but still fail to settle our border dispute (even though China succeeded with the other 12 countries above) So it's not from a lack of trying on China's part that the border dispute remains unresolved with Bhutan and India.
    9
  3666. Another rule, arguably the most important of all. Rule No. 6: Don't Worship Washington.
    9
  3667.  @almondcaeser9587  You said: "Chinese loans and debt trap destroyed Sri Lankan economy." Sri Lanka's economic woes were caused by rising global inflation and the Russo-Ukraine conflict, so how's China to blame?
    9
  3668.  @1313hyme  Sun Zi's The Art of War suggests that confusion/misleading tactics be applied to enemies, not to their own U.S allies like Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand. Furthermore, the U.S trying to confuse China doesn't work when China can see through the U.S actions.
    9
  3669.  @MarkYeung1  Chinese can always access Western websites through the use of VPNs. Haven't you watched Cyrus livestreaming on YouTube while in Shanghai?
    9
  3670. China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia have since succumbed to history. Throughout its long history, China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of various empires, yet China has survived the passage of time to the modern time relatively intact.
    9
  3671.  @nightmark2120  Recently, the Philippines has been rapidly improving its relations and cooperation with China on various issues, developing a stronger and stable ties with China. Whereas the U.S fought a war in Philippines when they tried to gain independence.
    9
  3672.  indiasuperclean6969  I feel for the victims of the recent train derailment in India. May whoever responsible be brought to justice.
    9
  3673. Also, if the digital infrastructure is good, it makes paying in digital RMB much more convenient.
    9
  3674.  @NoobGamer-ki9pz  China's ancient name for India is Tianzhu (天竺) which is translates to "Heavenly Place".
    9
  3675.  @MarkYeung1  Because China is a recognised nuclear country and Australia isn't. The Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) forbids signatories who don’t already have a bomb from making one. It also says they must put sensitive nuclear material, like enriched uranium, under international safeguards, monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), a watchdog. But there is a loophole through acquiring enriched uranium through nuclear submarines and Australia may use this opportunity to acquire weapons grade nuclear materials.
    9
  3676.  @fairhall001  "神州 Shenzhou There is nothing irrational about hating communism." About communist ideology, before 1912, Russia was once arguably the poorest country in Europe, full of peasants whose traditional household economies were extremely inefficient compared to agriculture in Western Europe or the United States. Only about 15% of the population lived in towns, and fewer than 10% worked in industry. Russia was also technologically backwards at that time compared to the more advanced European countries. But after the 1912 Communist Revolution, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe during its heyday, both economically as well as militarily, that's why NATO Was formed in response to USSR's rising military might. The Soviet Union was also the world's 2nd largest economy from 1960-1985 (source: Wikipedia: List of countries by largest historical GDP). The Soviets also made numerous scientific and technological advances during its time. Such an ideology that transformed arguably Europe's poorest country into its strongest. Yet many Westerners seem to harbor irrational hatred for communist ideology.
    9
  3677.  @fairhall001  Chairman Mao Zedong did not kill those people, they starved to death because of the Great Chinese Famine, caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao can't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    9
  3678.  @deanc6471  Tibet became part of China 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered both the Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty, and then incorporated those lands into Yuan Dynasty China. Centuries later, the Manchu conquerors also made Tibet part of Qing Dynasty.
    9
  3679. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    9
  3680.  @dinesh50448  "神州 Shenzhou It is a world war without nuke where everyone is lying about casualties but one country lying the most." Yes, USA has been lying the most. USA been involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Yemen War, bombing Middle East countries, yet USA suddenly show concern for Muslims in China?
    9
  3681.  @jacwi8719  You said: "You keep talking BS dude. You think China is not warmongering? Russia is not warmongering? Arabs are not warmongering? All countries are not warmongering?" Did I ever said those things about China, Russia, the Middle East and all countries? I merely said that "China is currently at peace and not at war with any country" even you confirmed this when you claimed USA poses an obstacle. But if according to you, USA is keeping China in check, then who's keeping the warmongering USA in check? Why is USA being allowed to wage wars against the Middle East with seemingly impunity? Hey, I'm all for peace between USA and China, and I'm glad that China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, and is instead investing in building infrastructure in developing countries. But who's keeping the USA in check?
    9
  3682.  @dinesh50448  You're the one resorting to racist insults against Chinese people's eyes and telling us to open our eyes just because they look small to you. Why resort to racist language instead of refuting my points?
    9
  3683. If we look at the chip industry long term, eventually silicon chips will approach the theoretical limit of just how small we can manufacture a chip, leading to a potential breakdown of Moore's law. Some experts believe that while silicon-based chips are reaching their physical limits, carbon-based chips (made of graphene) will form the next foundation material for semiconductors. Carbon-based chips offer several advantages over silicon-chips, such as better conductivity, faster transmission, better heat dissipation, lower power consumption, 3D stacking, and so on. Because of this, mainland China is investing in carbon-based chips and recently made several breakthroughs in the manufacture of such chips, because once the limits of silicon chips are reached, Taiwan would no longer hold power as the leading chip manufacturer, if the mainland is able to make carbon-based chips work.
    9
  3684. In Western culture, wearing a mask is seen as being selfish, like you are protecting yourself from catching other people's infection. In Eastern culture, wearing a mask is seen as being polite, like you are protecting others from catching your infection.
    9
  3685. It's a combination of the "Red Scare" (fear of communism) and the "Yellow Peril" (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, Westerners have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-liberal democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many Westerners to fathom.
    9
  3686. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US's).
    9
  3687.  @charlieqin1083  Wait a minute, you said that the Chinese in the countryside have a disposable income of 3~5 dollars, which is less than a sandwich or a hamburger in the US. But then you said a sandwich or hamburger in Tier-1 cities like Beijing or Shanghai cost more. Isn't it unfair to compare countryside income with Tier-1 city food prices?
    9
  3688. When Ukraine inevitably falls, the Ukrainian Army might feel disillusioned with the NATO , and potentially point such weapons to target civilian EU aircraft.
    9
  3689.  @iz1287  Hong Kong had been under authoritarian British colonial rule from 1841-1997, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before?
    9
  3690.  @ashokjain8449  You said: 'most China critics say they don't dislike Chinese people but their system' But it's true that there are many anti-China people who seem to make the same old excuse of "I'm not anti-China, I'm just anti-CPC" to defend themselves and justify their anti-China stance. They don't even shown the least bit of sincerity, they just can't stand to see China succeed under our political system that's all. So can't I call out such people?
    9
  3691.  @ashokjain8449  "神州 Shenzhou Because Chinese government is unscrupulous and operates by bribing others." India is a democracy and it's corrupt as well. Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-graft campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign. But after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    9
  3692. +GITESH JHA War is definitely no joking matter. Many Indian Army and PLA troops will die if war breaks out over this territorial dispute.
    9
  3693.  @worltrader5948  Pork is actually healthier than beef. Pork is typically lowest in calories and saturated fat when compared with other red meats.
    9
  3694.  @markbenjamin1703  Since the ski slop had met the International Olympic Committee standards for skiing, then what's wrong with Beijing hosting the 2022 Winter Olympics? Who knows as technology progresses, maybe one day in the future, an Middle Eastern or African city could host the Winter Olympics thanks to technology to create snow. The Winter Olympics shouldn't only be restricted to cities with cold climates, in my opinion.
    9
  3695. Agreed. I showed people this short 3 min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China, and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA
    9
  3696.  user-ol3ru2kf1c  Certainly not decoupling from China at least. Because Anthony Blinken, Janet Yellen, Gina Raimondo, James Cleverly have visited China, so it certainly doesn't sound like decoupling is taking place there.
    9
  3697.  @scroopynooperz9051  Cyrus Janssen appeared as a guest on the Piers Morgan Uncensored show, together with a British MP as another guest, and his words left them both speechless. An excellent performance by Cyrus on that show.
    9
  3698.  @chungusultimate  Yasmin Porat, an Israeli Kibbutz Survivor, said that the IDF forces fired on everyone there, including the hostages and she believes that some civilians could have been killed by friendly fire.
    9
  3699. China has nukes of our own to retaliate, and by nuking China, Russia loses valued ally against USA. China is also biggest trading partners with much of the world, so nuking China would send countries all over the world into recession as their economies collapse without China holding them up.
    9
  3700.  Naikomi  While it's true that poor people living in Germany earn a larger figure than the average Chinese, it goes without saying that the cost of living in Germany is much higher than in China. Living expenses are (generally) cheaper in China than in Germany, including things like food, housing, rent, cars, transport, clothing and so on. Of course, in the 1st tier cities like Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen the cost of living is higher than in rural China (or perhaps comparable to living in German cities).
    9
  3701. @Ben Benito 40% of the European Union's energy comes from Russian gas, and already countries like Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia, etc have announced that they'll be paying for Russian gas in rubles, so it's only a matter of time before more European countries use ruble to pay for gas. And the ruble was trading at around 79 ruble per U.S Dollar pre-war and the sanctions caused the ruble to plunge 60%, but today, the ruble has since recovered and is trading at 80 ruble per USD. So how is the ruble rubble?
    9
  3702.  @plaubelmakina8916  May I suggest you look up the Map of Qing Dynasty China, and Taiwan is clearly part of China during the Qing Dynasty at the very least.
    9
  3703.  @Planetarian43  This question wasn't asked by me, it was asked by CNA reporters to George Yeo. And he outright rejected the idea of Singapore joining the Chinese commonwealth, so I can't imagine Taiwan agreeing to this idea he proposed.
    9
  3704.  @deschan2246  Trump's tariffs are extremely unpopular among American businesses, since contrary to what Trump says, it's not China that pays for the tariffs, its the American firms that pay for it, and this will trickle down to affect the consumers (Americans themselves). So what makes you think Trump's tariffs will continue? Aren't American farmers also hurting from the trade war?
    9
  3705. USA: We want to make our products more competitive than our competitors, so that we get more $$$ China: Great idea, but first we will need access to your blueprints and for you to agree to share the IP rights. USA: Done!
    9
  3706. Many Western countries continue to purchase Russian gas in rubles, then can't China continue to do business with Russia too?
    9
  3707. Agreed. I would like to append a final line: Chn: "They took the bait" now that TSMC leaves TW, US has no further use for TW and will abandon it, leading invariably to reunification.
    9
  3708. Currently, Ukraine is NOT a Nato member yet why are they sending military aid to Ukraine? They are under no obligation to help Ukraine since its not a member.
    9
  3709.  @davidg.3406  "神州 Shenzhou why you think that 40 billions are free money? It need to be repaid." The problem arises when the money repaid to USA doesn't benefit the ordinary Americans, instead it goes into the pockets of politicians and the military-industrial complex. China gives out loans too, but at least both sides have something to gain from the transaction. As for printing money out of thin air, there will come a day when the people stop believing in the U.S dollar, and the collapse would be catastrophic. It's kinda like the Loony Tunes cartoon where Wild E Coyote chases Road Runner off a cliff and is running on mid-air with nothing supporting him. He continues running just like the U.S continues printing, but eventually reality will come crashing down upon him and the U.S.
    9
  3710.  @ziggyzugg  Your analogy is rather superficial, it just barely scratches the surface of the whole issue, and ignores the deep historical roots shared by both Ukraine and Russia. When you get married, you build a home together with shared experiences, shared property, and children get born as a result of such a union. During the Soviet Union period, people traveled all over the USSR, and many Russian troops were stationed in Ukraine, the Soviet's frontline towards the Germans (and later NATO). When the USSR dissolved in 1991, many Russians found themselves trapped in Ukraine, many Russian weapons were left behind in Ukraine, including some nukes. Approximately 1,000 warheads remained in Ukrainian territory after the collapse of the Soviet Union. But the ex-husband was generous, and he left the wife with property and children, and even paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. You said: "She liked her new life with her new friends and started to see a different brighter future for herself and started to understand how she could fulfill her potential." The village bully (USA) and his harem of wives (NATO countries) had no intention of allowing Ukraine to marry into the NATO family, because she often lined her pockets with their money (corruption), yet they still encouraged her and gave her false hope, in exchange for she turning more nasty towards her ex-husband. The only potential she would be fufiling would be allowing NATO to deploy soldiers and missiles right on her ex-husband's doorstep. You said: "Her ex-husband told her that she could forget her dreams and abducted one of the children." Crimea voted overwhelmingly (96.77%) to join the Russian Federation, it was because the child could see his mother gradually cosying up to the village bully and wanted no part of it. The ex-wife just couldn't see through the false promises made by the village chief and his wives. You said: "and then moved into her house saying that he needed to be there to protect the other two children" The ex-wife had been abusing her two other children for 8 years. Donetsk and Luhansk have the old scars of abuse all over their bodies, as well as many fresh bruises (Patrick Lancaster shows footage of the child abuse) and she also forbade her children from speaking Russian, their father's language while only allowing them to speak Ukrainian. You said: "finally he said that if he could not have the wife.. nobody could have her" Putin has stated that Russia has no plans to occupy Ukraine. The ex-husband's stated goals are to reform his ex-wife through demilitarization and de-Nazification. And the ex-wife is still under the delusion that the village chief and NATO (the "friends" she look up to) would somehow come to defense, when they continue to watch the conflict from a distance. Marrying into the NATO family is unlikely to happen now, because it would bring the family feud over to NATO, and they don't want that.
    9
  3711.  @MarkYeung1  By your logic, Nazi Germany attacked Poland, then why did the Allies attack Germany itself instead of limiting the fighting to just Poland itself according to your logic? Clearly when you want to stop a conflict, you target the root source and that is Kiev. So when Ukraine attacked the Donetsk and Luhansk (for 8 years now) Russia finally retaliated by attacking Kiev.
    9
  3712. The United States thought they could turn China against Russia like they did during the Sino-Soviet split, but China has learned lessons from history and firmly stands by Russia.
    9
  3713. Many overseas Chinese left while China was poor, and tend to have a mindset of worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture while harboring disdain for their own. Furthermore, they are surrounded by Western news about China's economic fall (when in fact, it's actually unfolding in the US right now even as we speak).
    9
  3714.  @bensanderson7144  When American companies come to China, they agreed to transfer technology as part of the terms of setting up shop here in China. Nobody force those Western companies like Apple or Nike to agree to those terms, if they disagreed, they are always welcome to pack their bags and take their business elsewhere. But if these companies wish to operate on China, then they should obey Chinese laws while in China. And China's authoritarian political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to) so is there really a need to abandon our political system and adopt liberal Western democracy? The reason while China is able to so effectively control the coronavirus situation (where many Western countries are failing) is thanks to the collective efforts of the government and the people.
    9
  3715.  @ryannverano6452  Look at Joe Biden approve sales of $735 million of US weapons to Israel even during Israeli-Palestinian bombing each other. Source: Biden administration approves $735 million weapons sale to Israel washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/05/17/biden-administration-approves-735-million-weapons-sale-israel/ The US military-industrial complex controls the US government for war and profit.
    9
  3716.  @ryannverano6452  Hamas group? So those 200 Palestinian civilians (including 59 children) died for what reason? And Joe Biden administration approves sales of $735 million weapons to Israel, but you rather act blind.
    9
  3717.  @MarkYeung1  Russia achieved control over those 4 oblasts so again, how is this a stalemate? Given that US has focused its attentions elsewhere, its highly likely that Russia will soon achieve victory over Ukraine.
    9
  3718.  @andrenogueira5058  Why should the Communists find another piece of land? Why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a major disadvantage compared to the Nationalist Kuomintang. The KMT had massive wealth (taxed from peasants), superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communist's right to rule China.
    9
  3719.  @MH-il1lk  Certainly not the US.
    9
  3720.  @sreeniv09  You said: "and with India it had so many clashes just 2 years ago 20 soldiers were killed while they were sleeping" According to Indian media, 18 of those Indian soldiers were "exposed to sub-zero temperatures in the high altitude terrain have succumbed to their injuries," so those soldiers froze to death.
    9
  3721.  @sreeniv09  You said: "Also China eats up all vulnerable orgs in various countries - Ask Australia" Did you know that of the Top 20 Australian companies, 15 are majority owned by US-based investors? 3 more were at least 25% US-owned. Using company ownership data from Bloomberg, I analysed the ownership of Australia’s 20 biggest companies a few days after the 2019 federal election in May. Of those 20, 15 were majority-owned by US-based investors. Three more were at least 25% US-owned. According to my analysis, all four of our big banks are majority-owned by American investors. The Commonwealth Bank of Australia, the nation’s biggest company, is more than 60% owned by American-based investors. So too are Woolworths and Rio Tinto. BHP, once known as “the Big Australian”, is 73% owned by American-based investors. ... Source: Worried about agents of foreign influence? Just look at who owns Australia’s biggest companies by The Conversation
    9
  3722.  @Something-tz2vw  But you're not even Filipino yourself, yet you blindly take Philippines side while seemingly unaware of the history. Take for example, Thitu Island in the Spratlys. After Japan's WWII surrender, the island was returned to Republic of China, so Chinese officials embarked to recover the island from the Japanese. They planted national markers on the major islands and drew up detailed maps of them and Thitu island was known as Zhongye Island (中业岛). In 1971 a strong typhoon hit the island and the ROC ordered all the garrisons on the Zhongye Island to withdraw to Taiping Island to avoid the typhoons. The Philippines saw this empty space and organized the troops to land on the island on 29 July and renamed the island "Pag-asa Island". When Chinese troops arrived at Zhongye Island, they found the Philippine Marine Corp stationed there, and the Chinese captain prepared to fire the gun. But they suddenly received an order from above not to challenge, and the troops returned to Taiping Island. These Chinese Kuomintang officers and men had to watch the Zhongye Island falling into the hands of the Philippines! Can you see how sneaky the Philippines were behaving here? They took advantage of the typhoon evacuating the Chinese troops so that they can swoop in and claim the Chinese territory for themselves.
    9
  3723.  @Something-tz2vw  Singapore is a successful country because of its leadership's ability to cooperate peacefully with global powers, maintaining balance, remaining as neutral as possible by not picking a side. The Philippines currently lack this important leadership. Colonial mentality has taken root in their leader's minds and they have gotten involved and taken a side firmly against China. The previous Philippine leader, Duterte was a rare instance of a Filipino who was aware of colonial mentality and fought against this mindset, but it looks as though Marcos Jr lacks this resolve.
    9
  3724. The U.S military-industrial complex encourages Americans to buy more guns and ammunition.
    9
  3725.  @vcci2999  China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. But Indian government didn't take the necessary precautions, so Indian government is the one responsible for Covid-19 deaths in India.
    9
  3726. Years living here has not changed him at all. He still considers America his home, and China a foreign land, despite having a wife and kids here. China is not his home, and Chinese people aren't his fellow countrymen. Instead we are always regarded as other people with different culture and strange traditions different from him.
    9
  3727.  @unholydanger  It's what the U.S stresses on, but the U.S imposes its own ideology on other countries and denies them a chance for their voices to be heard.
    9
  3728. The change in the US needs to come from within.
    9
  3729. Chinese people been recording history since before Qin Shi HuangDi, First Emperor of China, even unified China. We have records of all 650+ Chinese leaders, from before Xia to after Qing dynasty. We know the names of each emperor, their form of government, the names of their top generals, the size of their armies and territory. We know how each emperor ruled, whether benevolent or cruel, how many concubines they had, how many sons were born and how many daughters. We recorded every war China had ever won and lost, how many soldiers and civilians were killed, how much tribute was paid to China and how much tribute was given in return. We know how each emperor lived and died, whether he was poisoned, and which son succeeded him, and what happened to his other sons and daughters. Few other countries have records of their history that even approaches Chinese standards. Which other countries can produce sufficient evidence to even dispute our claims? Even Goguryeo's history was recorded from China's point of view. Korea didn't even exist yet, and Korean scholars have to consult Chinese archives for information about Goguryeo's history. They then make up some vague claim that Goryeo is named after Goguryeo, but have no evidence support their claim.
    8
  3730. Western media is always seemingly biased about China's economic slowdown. Just look at their reports from the 1990s. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China.
    8
  3731. Duterte in effect, just prevented a potential war from breaking out in South China Sea.
    8
  3732. It would be moment in history if US and Russia become allies. But then, why make an enemy out of China? Why become good friends with historical enemy only to declare war on good trading partner?
    8
  3733.  @dlwatib  "Language is first and foremost spoken." Besides Chinese, other early writing systems were mostly pictograms like Egyptian hieroglyphs even Sumerian Cuneiform began as a system of pictograms. Therefore, this shows that not all languages are based upon the sounds, people communicate meaning, not sounds. "Chinese characters are doomed. They are much too inefficient and will eventually get replaced by the Roman alphabet." Inefficient? Chinese sentences tend to be a third shorter than English sentences. Chinese characters are compact and can be written left to right, right to left, even top to bottom. Just look at the colourful neon signboards in the streets of Hong Kong for example and Chinese sentences can be written in various directions and still be legible. Besides, using Roman alphabet to approximate Chinese pronunciation is only marginally useful, so many foreigners still butcher Mandarin pronunciation regardless of the Pinyin alphabet guiding them.
    8
  3734.  @MarkYeung1  Anthony Blinken met Mahmoud Abbas who called for a ceasefire in Gaza, but that is something that the US is opposed to. Had the US been truly interested in a peaceful solution, they would have halted the supply of weapons to Israel. But American diplomats have simply refused to call for any ceasefire whereas China has been calling for a ceasefire all this time.
    8
  3735.  @Carbuncle0168  Chiang kai-Shek = Cash My Check!
    8
  3736.  @MarkYeung1  President Xi actually offered to extend the One Country, Two Systems Policy to include Taiwan, allowing the island to keep their government, keep their elections, their currency, passport, even keep their military, but be considered reunified with the mainland. It would be as if North Korea and South Korea both agree to unify as a single country, Korea, while allowing both sides to keep their respective governments. But former Taiwan President Ma rejected Xi's offer and did not offer a counter proposal of his own.
    8
  3737.  @stevewang2  "This is called "Colonialism of the Mind"." Precisely. When people get colonized by another group, their minds also get colonized as well. Even though Hong Kong, India, Phillippines have undergone decolonization, the "decolonization of the mind" needs to happen among the people living in those regions.
    8
  3738.  @ashpatel2505  "Remember it’s not what you think about China matters, but what the civilized world thinks about China matters!" Your Colonial Mentality is showing here. Why should China care what the civilized world (by which I take you refer to the West) think about China? Only people with Colonial Mentality will continue to care what they consider the "civilized world" thinks of their country. "Do you realize two of the countries you mentioned are considered pariah in the world and are considered outcasts in the international community?" Like China, India does not condemn Russia's special military operation. India was also one of North Korea's biggest trading partners after China, so what point are you trying to make here? "eighty percent of the countries you listed, aren’t democracies and some of them were members of the Soviet Empire and are now in Russian bloc. Your list also tells me the company you keep!" Why can't China keep company with countries that aren't Western democracies? Isn't India also good friends with Russia? Or has the Colonial Mentality gotten to you so badly already?
    8
  3739.  @ashpatel2505  "No one is saying that China can not forge new world order, and but not by picking fight with trading partners." You literally said the Chinese government is trying to force the issue by challenging the world order. And how is China picking a fight with trading partners? Chinese government is against decoupling from the rest of the world, but it's the U.S that decide to ban chips to China, yet you're claiming its the fault the Chinese government?
    8
  3740.  @ashpatel2505  "When I suggest “China’s place in the world”, I didn’t mean behind the west, but your inferiority complex lead to your conclusion." There's plenty of examples of your colonial mentality in your words. Look, earlier you said: "Remember it’s not what you think about China matters, but what the civilized world thinks about China matters!" then aren't you implying China should remain behind the West?
    8
  3741.  @fadliyaakob6001  Good or bad, Trump is merely a symptom of Americans growing dissatisfaction, not the cause of it. Cyrus said that the media is dividing Americans, but by claiming that Trump's election is probably "the worst thing to happen to this country", isn't he also sowing division by alienating Trump supporters?
    8
  3742.  @infernobat8325  China actually proposed a 12 point peace process for Ukraine and Putin has agreed with it, whereas the U.S opposes this peace plan.
    8
  3743.  @johnneijzen  Please see a doctor if you got a bad cough. Mainland China hasn't even lifted a finger in Hong Kong's internal affairs, despite the HK protests lasting for half a year. The Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (world's most spoken language by number of speakers) Chinese history and singing patriotic songs about China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth and they learn English at school, American history and sing patriotic songs about America. Tiananmen Square is a large parade square in Beijing where we recently celebrated the the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China. What about it? What "South East Asia Maritime claims Wars" are you talking about? Which country is China currently at war with, you tell me?
    8
  3744.  @chrishannis1  One day in the future, the CIA might have to start paying you in digital Renminbi.
    8
  3745.  @yslee1401  Of course! Putting Meng under house arrest protects her from the CPC's clutches! It all makes sense now! Why didn't I think up such a conspiracy theory myself!
    8
  3746. +frm jerry 你们国民党不是说过要收回大陆吗？都已经过了七十多年，为什么台湾还没动手呢？
    8
  3747.  @autodidact537  If China really murders our own people, then why is China currently the country with the world's largest population of 1.4 billion people?
    8
  3748.  @ChillDfect  Come visit China and you can hear many Chinese say: "Welcome to China!". But if say a Chinese (or just any Asian) travels to the United States, you can actually hear many Americans say: "Go back to China!". You know this to be true.
    8
  3749.  @davidmorrison-io4co  You said: "America respects China but the Chinese Communist Party that is the issue." China was once a impoverished, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward today and China has transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (in fact, the largest by PPP) the world's factory (Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the largest military in the world, the People's Liberation Army. And this was all achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, yet you're saying Americans are taking issue against the Chinese government after their transformation of China?
    8
  3750.  @MarkYeung1  "In 1905 United States mediated the end of the Russo Japanese War. Nobody forced USA to do it." Yet, why are Western countries threatening China with possible sanctions if they want China to be a mediator in the Russo-Ukraine conflict?
    8
  3751.  @johnsilver9338  "But hostile to your own neighbors like South East Asia." China is the largest trading partner of many South East Asian (or ASEAN) countries, how is China hostile to our neighbors in SE Asia? Is China currently at war with any SE Asian nation?
    8
  3752.  @CyrusJanssen  15:24 "If China and the United States went to a conflict, the United States would easily win that." I disagree with this claim. The mighty United States Army just lost a 20-year war in Afghanistan against a bunch of insurgents in Afghanistan. So it shows that the country with the bigger military spending and greater military experience, doesn't mean it will win.
    8
  3753. Maybe it's precisely because China took this action, therefore Western countries can't take this action anymore, because China is doing it, and whatever China is doing is wrong in their eyes. They can't afford to be seen following what China is doing.
    8
  3754. I think Brian is viewing the conflict from a Russian lens or a Chinese lens. But in my opinion, the Israel-Palestine issue should be viewed through an Arab lens in order to truly understand the situation.
    8
  3755.  @pausereflect5911  There's nothing fundamentally wrong with the character Winnie the Pooh. But still, it's racist to compare a yellow bear with small eyes to a Chinese man. It would be just as racist as comparing Barack Obama to King Kong.
    8
  3756. Technically, the PLA still fought against Japan for 8 years. If you have smaller numbers than your enemy, then you should strategically utilize tactics suitable for small numbers against a more numerous opponent. And after the Japanese surrender in 1945, the PLA had 1,200,000 troops (July 1945) whereas the KMT had 4,300,000 troops (June 1946) so KMT still outnumber PLA by about 3 to 1. Furthermore, the PLA had minimal Soviet support and often had to make use of leftover Japanese tanks, whereas the KMT had the support of USA. But KMT was corrupt, and pocketed about $750 million dollars worth of US military aid, so much that US President Truman wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", and began suspending aid to KMT.
    8
  3757.  @MarkYeung1  "Wasn't the invasion supposed to be over 3 days after February 24th, 2022?" Russia never claimed that it expected to capture Ukraine in three days, and the “three days” claim never existed anywhere outside of media in the west.
    8
  3758.  @MarkYeung1  "Their philosophies are the same." If their philosophies are the same, why did Putin call out the Canadian parliament for standing up and applauding a 98-year old Ukrainian SS veteran? Doesn't it appear that the Canadian government is the one sharing the same philosophy here?
    8
  3759. According to the following 2018 source, Japan is ranked 18th with 19.1 suicides per 100,000 people, compared to China's ranked 69th with 10 suicides per 100,000 people. Source: worldpopulationreview (dot) com/countries/suicide-rate-by-country/
    8
  3760.  @michaels4255  You said: "The US did not colonize the Philippines. Spain colonized the Philippines for hundreds of years." That's strange. Why is it that the Filipinos speak such good English and such poor Spanish, despite the Philippines having been colonized by Spain for hundreds of years, while the U.S (according to you) did no such thing? Sounds like American Imperialist white-washing at its finest if you ask me.
    8
  3761. Prof Zhang Weiwei summed up China's political system as the combination of Eastern meritocracy with Western democracy, in a two-pronged approach he termed "Selection + Election". Selection: Candidates must take and pass various exams & tests in order to prove their competence. This is derived from the ancient Chinese Imperial Examination system. Elections: Candidates must also be persuasive enough to sell the benefits of their policies to other communist members and garner sufficient votes. This is derived from Western election process. In this way, China ensures that our political candidates not only have good grades, but are also able to garner support for their policies.
    8
  3762.  @alone-tt8dg6ic6f USA: "Number 1: Those bio labs in Ukraine do not exist! Period!" USA: "Number 2: Those non-existent labs are for civilian use, definitely not military purposes!" USA: "Number 3: If Russia gets their hands on those non-existent civilian labs, they will most certainly use the data to create miltary bio weapons! No doubt about it!"
    8
  3763.  @maicholaa7482  Did you see my source that China's supercomputer Tianhe-1 (天河-1) found that the lungs of a young American vaper hospitalized for "mysterious pneumonia" last summer showed similar symptoms of Covid-19? Source: thestar.com.my/tech/tech-news/2020/04/09/chinese-supercomputer-and-american-doctors-clash-over-ai-coronavirus-diagnosis-of-young-us-vaper
    8
  3764.  @zacharymcmillan2788  Indeed. It says 9 replies here on this thread at this moment, yet I've only counted 5 comments being displayed on my screen here.
    8
  3765.  @Andy-P  Chairman Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    8
  3766.  @rpg1663  About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    8
  3767. Such intelligent and rational discussion of China by people who've actually been, is sadly in short supply in the West,
    8
  3768. We need to send this video to others before YouTube decides to cancel Brian's channel.
    8
  3769.  @vangeezer  It's probably more a geopolitical game of chess, rather than martial arts.
    8
  3770. But how then would you refer specifically to "the people of the United States" if not by the name "Americans"?
    8
  3771.  @Nesher92  Taiwan's constitution clearly says Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of ROC Administrative and Claims. Source: Map of ROC Administrative and Claims wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg
    8
  3772. To Li What do you want to talk about then? China has surpassed the USA in certain scientific fields such as supercomputers. China is home to world's fastest supercomputer and in a 2017 Top 500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the worlds fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source: China races pass US supercomputer cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/
    8
  3773. @comment sense Yet why is it Americans are the ones "crying" about China? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it seems like the U.S is a threat to global peace and stability.
    8
  3774.  @elanor2123  So the PLA had the support of many farmers (whom made up the majority of China's population at that time) whereas the KMT were corrupt and terrorized nearby villages for food, then it appears you have your answer as to why the KMT, despite all their wealth and numerical superiority, still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. It substantiates my point that the KMT don't deserve to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists' right to rule China. "Were KMT soldiers really professional?" They certainly had a background of military training, given their access to resources like food, fuel and weapons, that the communist didn't have as peasants. "Then they should get more credit for using their professionalism against the Japanese in nowadays Chinese dramas," Being professionally trained, doesn't necessarily translate to fighting professionally against the Japanese. For example, in 1938, the KMT deliberately blew up a dike along the Yellow River in an attempt to halt the rapid advance of Japanese forces, but the floodwaters ended up destroying thousands of square km of farmland, and shifted the course of the Yellow River hundreds of kilometers to the south. Thousands of villages were inundated, and several million villagers were forced from their homes and made refugees. An official Kuomintang-led postwar commission estimated that the total number of casualties may be as high as 800,000 killed by the flood. The worst thing is that the Japanese troops were out of its range, either to the north and east or to the south. And while their advance on Zhengzhou was halted, the Japanese still took Wuhan by attacking from a different direction, so for what reason was this artificial flood by the KMT for? It has been called the "largest act of environmental warfare in history" and an example of scorched earth military strategy. Source: 1938 Yellow River flood
    8
  3775. In China, it's difficult for politicians to enter the government, but it's easy to enact changes once they're in power. In USA, it's easy for politicians to enter the government, but it's difficult to enact changes once they're in power.
    8
  3776.  @zackk4969  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"? Video: Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' youtu.be/DPt-zXn05ac
    8
  3777. China lifted 600 million people out of poverty in just 30 years. For comparison, Africa's entire population is 1.2 billion, so China lifted a number equal to 1/2 of Africa's entire population out of poverty in decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    8
  3778.  Andrew Ski  How about you ask Westerners why they stole the house from Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals and occupy their lands even till today? And about getting carjacked, your car decide to drive over to China by themselves, motivated by cheap labor, then how can you accuse people of stealing your car?
    8
  3779. Chinese workers help manufacture products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, clothing, sneakers, toys, etc, to help lower the cost of living in other countries. Think of the millions of dollars people have saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to Chinese goods, and the saved money on Chinese goods could be spent on things like cars, houses, getting married, etc.
    8
  3780.  @borisnegrarosa9113  "Show us proof of that "armada " That's right, you can't." Seven large sunken ships were found in the sea near Dongsha Island, which were confirmed to belong to Zheng He's fleet. Yet despite China's huge naval force at that time, China did not seek conquest of overseas territories, nor to found overseas colonies, unlike the Western colonial powers that appeared centuries later.
    8
  3781. If the U.S does succeed in transferring Taiwan's TSMC wafer fabrication technology to Arizona, does this mean that the island no longer serves any use for them?
    8
  3782.  @RD-ij2sz  "And Port Grabbing" Initially, Sri Lanka wasn't making money in Hambantota, so they decided a better arrangement would be to lease Hambantota port to Chinese companies to develop for 99 years, in order to free up Sri Lankan revenue to spend elsewhere. Once 99 years are up, the lease would have expired and the port fully returned back to Sri Lanka. So Sri Lanka actually stands to benefit in the long run.
    8
  3783.  @otomackena7610  Could you name some of these Indian software companies then? And software companies founded in the US by Indians, are American companies not Indian companies.
    8
  3784.  @catmandu6776  Imperial Japan refused to surrender even after two atomic bombings of its cities by the United States. In fact, the last campaign fought of WWII was the Soviet Union's invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria that finally caused Japan to surrender at the end of WWII. So if anything, we should be thanking the Soviet communists for finally putting an end to WWII.
    8
  3785.  @jtf873  In a multipolar world, countries like Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, etc all have a voice of their own, whereas in the unipolar world, only the voice of the US is heard. Take the recent veto of the UN resolution calling for a cease-fire in Gaza by the United States. That's what happens in a unipolar world.
    8
  3786.  @joelturley4847  Why are you resorting to hurling racial slurs against me?
    8
  3787. So how is ROC truly democratic when it has been ruled by Jiang Jieshi and his authoritarian single-party KMT for nearly its entire life? Although single-party, Taiwan prospered greatly under KMT's leadership. But only in 2016, when another inexperienced party (DPP) took over from KMT, did Taiwan's economy began to decline.
    8
  3788. Ice age conditions? Did you notice how high the altitude of the villages are in the video? What about those brand new resettlement villages, being built to house these poor people, where they can have access to food, running water, electricity and gas, so that they don't have to cook their food over an open fire?
    8
  3789. The advantage of China's digital Yuan is that short term visitors to China get to enjoy the convenience of using WeChat Pay/Alipay, all without the requirement of setting up a Chinese bank account first. Hopefully it will draw more international tourists to China and allow them to enjoy the convenience of mobile payment in China.
    8
  3790. @@USA11111 Why not? Nobody says that the United States should remain the dominant power for all time. Remember, during the 19th Century, Britain was a superpower, but was eventually overtaken by the U.S in the 20th Century? Then can't China dominate the 21st Century?
    8
  3791. Rather than sanctions or war, why not trade instead? Trade builds development, improves communication and creates linkages to make fighting with each other an undesirable outcome.
    8
  3792. Social Credit System has got to be one of the most heard accusation about China, much like the organ-harvesting accusation.
    8
  3793. UNESCO ranks China as the world's 2nd in total number of World Heritage sites, just behind Italy in 1st place.
    8
  3794.  @joelturley4847  Even Janet Yellen said that a decoupling of the US and Chinese economies would be impossible.
    8
  3795.  @joelturley4847  Hey, since you're obviously so enthusiastic about decoupling, have you checked to see where is your phone or device made? Does it contain parts that are made in China? Or does it make uses of rare earth metals mined from China? Perhaps you could speed up the process of decoupling by getting rid of your device.
    8
  3796.  @robertphillips2983  Yeah right. Australia has been sailing warships through the Taiwan strait between Taiwan island and the mainland. China is only responding to Australia's "message" with a live fire exercise conducted off the coast of Australia that's all.
    8
  3797. China can feed the world's largest population, and still export produce to other countries.
    8
  3798.  @cchannel7857  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According to Gregory Clark, all available eyewitness present inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    8
  3799. The United States introduces an unnecessary premise, which is that developing countries must implement political reforms and institute "freedom and democracy" as condition for U.S aid.
    8
  3800. The "Yellow Peril" mindset never died out. Since 19th century, Westerners have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-liberal democratic country like China eventually surpassing the West someday in the future, is simply too frightening for Westerners to fathom.
    8
  3801. The White House is full of incompetent officials. Joe Biden, Anthony Blinken, Jen Psaki, these faces that appear during press conferences are experts in dodging questions, redirecting blame and not accepting responsibility for their actions.
    8
  3802.  @valenrn8657  Because Australia is not a nuclear country, so if Australia obtains highly enriched fissile material, it would be in violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty.
    8
  3803.  @leelhasa6294  Its actually a Western myth that student protestors actually died on June 3rd and 4th in 1989 that night in Tiananmen Square. The so-called massacre has been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time - among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies by Gregory Clark Source: https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053 In the uploader's video, does it show any student being run over by tanks and getting shot? The Tankman scene even shows the tank halting in front of the man isn't it?
    8
  3804. Who gave the deadline of 3 days to Russia's special military operation? Russia never said how long the operation will last.
    8
  3805. Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiment is rising in the West towards Russia and China. And it's having the effect of pushing both our countries closer together than we've ever been.
    8
  3806.  @truthaboveall7988  When India starts to become more powerful, they will get the same treatment from the West as China is getting today.
    8
  3807. "America is the only major developed society where the average income of the bottom 50 percent has gone down over a 30-year period." - Kishore Mabubani.
    8
  3808. Among men, Lu Bu is unparalleled, and among horses, Red Hare is unmatched.
    8
  3809.  @amc3463  Listen to the leaked audio recordings of Victoria Nuland with Geoffrey Pyatt on choosing the next Ukrainian President after Yanukovych was ousted. The candidate Nuland picked was Arseniy Yatsenyuk and it turns out that he became the Prime Minister of Ukraine, so the coup is orchestrated by the U.S.
    8
  3810. deioped Why you think China is sh**hole? China today is quite developed and modern if you actually been to China. Here is a short 2min video about the beautiful night views in 11 Chinese cities. Video:Beautiful Night View of China 2016 youtube.com/watch?v=G7ZRa-w9xyA
    8
  3811.  @garygraham8373  Chairman Mao did not murder those people during the Great Leap Forward, those people starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    8
  3812.  @garygraham8373  You said that fifty million people died during the Great Leap Forward (1958-1962), But China's population in 1955 was 612,241,552 and by 1960, China's population actually rose to 660,408,054, having increased by 48 million in 5 years from 1955-1960. Population of China from 1950 to 1970 1950: 554,419,268 1955: 612,241,552 1960: 660,408,054 1965: 724,218,970 1970: 827,601,385 ... Source: Population Pyramid: China So you're claiming that China's population decreased by 50 million during the Great Leap Forward (1958-1962), when from 1955-1960, China's population actually increased by a further 48 million?
    8
  3813. Well, Trump is a well-known golfer, but it doesn't necessarily mean Trump has a clear mind.
    8
  3814. Indeed. Cyrus is no doubt aware of Western MSM is painting China in a negative light, but has he considered that perhaps that Western MSM is doing the same to Russia?
    8
  3815.  @jglenn2282  On what grounds do you think it is not mutually beneficial?
    8
  3816. How is this journalism? Who was that mysterious distorted voice on board the train? They just record some unnamed voice as pass it off as an "Uighur" and you believe it?
    8
  3817.  @MarkYeung1  China is neutral party in the Ukraine conflict. China has sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine, while still continuing to do business with Russia. China has put forth a 14-point peace process for Ukraine, and Russia has welcomed the move while the US is against this plan.
    8
  3818.  @MarkYeung1  Did you hear what the remarks that Ukraine President's advisor made about Chinese? Mikhail Podoliak, the top aide to Zelenskyy, said that China (and India) “don’t analyse the consequences of the steps they take." Podoliak also said that the two Asian powerhouses have “low intellectual potential,” then honestly speaking, why should Chinese support Ukraine like you said?
    8
  3819. Here's an analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Crimea had opted to rejoin the father. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they still gave Ukraine a false sense of hope. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    8
  3820.  @valenrn8657  You know which country is the world's most protectionist? Answer: the United States. According to Global Trade Alert, the US had taken over 800 protectionist measures since 2008, while the EU had over 300 whereas China only had 200-300 of such measures. Source: Wikipedia: Protectionism
    8
  3821.  @randythompson4006  What makes you think China doesn't allow me to comment on this video?
    8
  3822.  @superchuck3259  I thought the US believed in free market competition, yet their response is to impose tariffs on the competition to stop them getting a bigger market share?
    8
  3823. United States: "We will be boycotting the 2022 Beijing Olympics." Other 5 Eyes countries: "Us too!" United States: "SIKE! We will be sending 18 officials to attend the Olympics!" Other 5 Eyes: "Wait…what? How are we going to explain our boycott to Beijing now? Why are we even following the US anyway?"
    8
  3824. China's supercomputer Tianhe-1 (天河-1) found that the lungs of a young American vaper hospitalized in USA for "mysterious pneumonia" last summer could be exhibiting Covid-19. scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3079046/chinese-supercomputer-and-american-doctors-clash-over-ai
    8
  3825.  @annakaye1629  Indeed. Tucker Carlson's interview with Putin began with an enlightening history lesson of how the territory that constitutes Ukraine today actually came from Russia, Poland, Hungary, etc. In fact, the name Ukraine is derived from the Old Slavic term for "borderland".
    8
  3826. China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    8
  3827. Taiwan was ruled for nearly its entire life by authoritarian, single-party dictatorship of KMT and Taiwan had been under martial law for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under KMT dictatorship, Taiwan's economy thrived and progressed economically under KMT's leadership. Only in 2016 (2 years ago) did another political party DPP, took over KMT at the reins, and since then, Taiwan's economy is in a slump, people are fighting themselves in the parliament and throwing furniture at each other. Massive fight breaks out in Taiwanese parliament youtube.com/watch?v=kXmPDLRt6hA Why change your government from a single-party dictatorship that actually works for Taiwan, into a multiparty system where the parties fight each other and throw furniture at each other? Look at China, keeping our single-party government and now China is now the world's 2nd largest economy.
    8
  3828.  @daddy9267  No involvement? Didn't NATO approve billions of dollars in military aid to Ukraine?
    8
  3829.  @diorocks5858  In accordance with international humanitarian law, wars of national liberation have been expressly embraced, through the adoption of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, as a protected and essential right of occupied people everywhere.
    8
  3830. Furthermore, the US market is only 300 million whereas the Chinese is 1.4 billion.
    8
  3831. Mao Zedong managed to unify China (which the previous Kuomintang administration of China from 1911-1949, failed to achieve even after 37 years) in 1949 and proclaimed the People's Republic of China. He turned the Chinese Communist Party with a mere strength of 50 members at the beginning of 1921, to one of the world's largest political party today, with more than 80 million members (about the population size of Germany)
    8
  3832. @CCP's GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG Which Chinese Internet platform have you been on? Weibo? WeChat? Youku? Could you quote me some examples of hate speech in Chinese Internet against those who oppose the Communist Party?
    8
  3833. Even Korea's Samsung is made in China as well.
    8
  3834.  @bbj7383  Where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    8
  3835.  @petersinclair3997  Till today, Taiwan maintains its claim to the SCS, yet you're singling out mainland China's ambition as a concern?
    8
  3836.  @MarkYeung1  That part of China you refer to isn't performing well economically under this Western style democracy. That island's economy is stagnant, their wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, and graduates from that island are seeking job opportunities elsewhere, in mainland China or in places like Singapore. This is astonishing given that the island was previously one of the Four Asian Tigers, where it experienced great economic progress under the authoritarian single-party Kuomintang rule.
    8
  3837.  @learning7140  You said: "The rest of the world will be functioning in 5G, but Russia may have no internet at all." On the other hand, this is a golden opportunity for Russia to develop domestic companies and brands to replace those Western companies that left Russia. Already, Russia is developing their own local version of McDonald's and there's more power to the people if foreign companies are replaced by local companies. As for the Internet in Russia, the withdrawal of 4G or 3G companies from Russia potentially facilitates the faster adoption of 5G. With the 4G/3G apparatus dismantled as companies pull out, the 4G/3G infrastructure would become useless, so why not start afresh with 5G? Whereas in the Western countries, because of the existence of 4G/3G, the people may be reluctant to adopt 5G, or simply don't see the need to do so, if they can achieve all they want with the existing 4G/3G infrastructure.
    8
  3838.  Beast Mode  You misspelled, it should be Cyrus is highly based.
    8
  3839.  Beast Mode  So you're just going to go around calling people shills just because they happen to have an opinion different from yours?
    8
  3840. Chinese 'ghost cities' have been slowly coming alive, as every year, millions of people from the rural countryside migrate to the urban centers to look for jobs. For example in 2011, London’s Daily Mail reported that the Zhengzhou 郑州 New Area was China’s largest “Ghost City.” but today, Zhengzhou has a populationhas a population of 9,378,000 inhabitants. It takes time for the ghost cities to get filled up with people migrating from the rural countryside. Here are 5 Chinese Ghost Cities that came alive too. Source:5 Chinese Ghost Cities that Came Alive vagabondjourney.com/5-chinese-ghost-cities-came-alive/
    8
  3841. My favorite go-to sources of information regarding geopolitics are Martin Jacques, Kishore Mabubani, Zhang Weiwei and Eric X. Li.
    8
  3842.  @Curry.59  The Tibetan population in China has nearly quadrupled from 2 million (1953) to 7 million (2020). Likewise, the Uighur population in China has nearly quadrupled from 3 million (1953) to 11 million (2020). Both the Tibetans and Uighurs in China appear to be doing well.
    8
  3843. Apart from Russia, China has successfully tested a cutting-edge hypersonic aircraft, the Xingkong-2 (星空-2 "Starry Sky-2") launched using a rocket. The aircraft rides shockwaves generated by it's hypersonic flight and maintained speeds above Mach 5.5 (or 5.5 times the speed of sound) for more than 400 seconds, attaining a top speed of 7,344 kmph. Experts say the aircraft's speed and unpredictable trajectory will challenge modern missile defense systems. Video: Military news: China tests hypersonic aircraft Starry Sky-2 youtu.be/aVWQ2uOCepU
    8
  3844.  Anthony Payne  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    8
  3845.  @johnsmith1953x  You can purchase affordable All-in-One PCs in China at prices of $163 - $180 (from Ali BaBa) let alone $20,000. You can of course splurge more money to get the higher end PCs in China if you want.
    8
  3846.  @chinadollfmd  How is China prolonging the pandemic? China is curbing the spread of Covid-19 through lockdowns under a zero covid policy, so that transmissions is minimised as much as possible and that mutations and new variants are unlikely to appear in China.
    8
  3847.  @nemod.8310  No, HarmonyOS is not an Android fork, it is a distributed operating system. It means that you can have multiple nodes, (in case of HarmonyOS these are devices) which perform their specific functions and can talk to each other, preferably in a secure manner. HarmonyOS is designed with a layered architecture, which from bottom to top consists of the kernel layer, system service layer, framework layer, and application layer. System functions are expanded by levels, from system to subsystem, and further to function/module. In multi-device deployment scenario, unnecessary subsystems, functions, or modules can be excluded from the system as required.
    8
  3848. China wants to integrate further into the global supply chain. Whereas the USA wants to decouple from China.
    8
  3849.  @valuedcustomer8922  Shame on the BBC for twisting the truth.
    8
  3850.  @valuedcustomer8922  A cancer on this world? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w You claim that I'm unable to see this cancer, why don't you help me see it then?
    8
  3851. American healthcare workers look overwhelmed, overworked, exhausted, ill-equipped facing shortage of masks, gloves, goggles, faceshields, and PPE suits. Chinese doctors and nurses look well-equipped in comparison, with N95 masks and full hazmat suits.
    8
  3852.  @billyehh  "神州 Shenzhou In Ontario Canada, we are developing the Ring of Fire, which contains most of those rare elements." Canada's rare earth metal production does match up to China's. The amount of rare earths yielded from Canadian production is insignificant compared to China's rare earth productions, so products made from Canadian rare earths cost far more than Chinese products.
    8
  3853.  刘兵  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    8
  3854.  @HannarrMontannarr  "@神州 Shenzhou China has the 2nd largest economy solely because it has the largest population" Really? Then why India, world's 2nd largest population does not have 3rd or 4th largest economy then? Isn't India the world's largest democracy too? Many Indians speak English (the preferred language for Westerners) whereas many Chinese still struggle with English even till today. Yet China has since overtaken India in many fields? You said "Lets not forge that china attack UN forces in korea, an organisation that it was a member of," The Korean War was from 1950-1953, and at that time, the People's Republic of China was NOT a member of the United Nations. The PRC only became a UN member in 1971 when the UN voted to kick ROC out of UN Security Council and to recognize PRC as China after winning a two-thirds majority vote. So how was PRC a member of UN at the time of the Korean War? During the Korean War, the People's Liberation Army were mostly poorly trained peasants, our weapons were crappy, our supply lines were overextended, our air and naval support non-existent, and China only had North Korean troops for allies (Soviet Union only provided material support) On the other hand, South Korea had the combined armies of United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Greece, France, + 10 other countries, had superior equipment, better training, adequete air and naval support, and with Japanese manufacturing capability nearby providing logistical support. Yet despite all these advantages, those 16 countries still did not win the Korean war? Against poorly training PLA troops, with our lousy weapons, our overextended supply lines? With only North Korean troops to support China?
    8
  3855.  @Naikomi95  About education in China, China has also been a top destination for international students and as of 2013, China was the most popular country in Asia for international students and ranked third overall among countries.
    8
  3856.  ChinaAintGot NoTegridy  China has lifted 700 million people out of poverty by international standards in just 40 years, whereas the whole rest of the world only lifted 150 million by comparison. Video: Historical achievement: Take 700 million out of poverty youtu.be/CljWffPgmG8 "China has lifted 728 million people out of poverty by international standards. The whole rest of the world has only lifted 152 million." - John Ross, Well-known columnist in UK, Former Deputy mayor of London.
    8
  3857. Agreed. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    8
  3858.  user-bz4tw3bu9u  Free Australian journalist Julian Assange from prison, and bring him back to his wife and kids.
    8
  3859. China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization, as well as a modern space nation today. It's a like Sid Meier's Civilization game, surviving from Bronze Age to Space Age.
    8
  3860. China seeks win-win cooperation, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    8
  3861. If that's really the case then why does Cyrus still need to include sponsors in his videos?
    8
  3862.  @Kenshin6321  The problem is that Simu Liu said that Shang-Chi is finally giving people representation with Asian Culture, but this is not true. Like you said, there were Chinese actors like Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Donnie Yen, who were representing Chinese/Asian culture long before Simu Liu. Video: Forget Jackie Chan and Bruce Lee! Marvel's Shang-Chi actor says he's the FIRST Asian hero ever! youtu.be/qomtBkjKOmI
    8
  3863.  @haronmenezes4562  China had informed the World Health Organization of mysterious new virus strain on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had isolated the coronavirus strain in record time from millions of flu viruses, and by 7th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    8
  3864.  @idlecity  Western countries are going ahead with implementing a price cap on Russian oil, instead of letting market forces determine the price, and therefore, going against their own principles of a free market. Isn't this an illustration of a planned economy?
    8
  3865.  @bjrnhjortshjandersen1286  Difficult but manageable. If China is successful in this regard, the benefits are worth the climb.
    8
  3866.  @nickiseb8910  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Song Dynasty China as well as the Kingdom of Tibet and then incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. Centuries later, the Manchu conquerors did the same during Qing Dynasty. Tibet broke free of China in 1912, but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951.
    8
  3867.  @knowitall5913  He mentioned EU diplomats, China actually invited EU diplomats to visit Xinjiang and see for themselves that there are no human rights violations in Xinjiang. Source: China invites EU diplomats to see 'the real situation in Xinjiang' as Beijing is accused of widespread abuses against the region's Muslim population (dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8734469/China-says-EU-observers-free-visit-Xinjiang.html )
    8
  3868.  @baojhoang7242  In a poll of nearly 7500 readers by the United Daily News (Taiwan Newspaper) website, 61 percent said the trip was not welcome as it may destabilise the Taiwan Strait. Only 38 percent welcomed the visit and said it had more advantages than disadvantages.
    8
  3869.  @ericcartmann  China is going to collapse soon? That's what Western economists been saying all along! 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. But its already 2019, and China's economy is still going strong, so why continue to believe Western anti-China propaganda? When it has been consistently proven wrong for almost 30 years?
    8
  3870.  @cchannel7857  Cyrus has stated in his email that he's been very busy lately. It's not unheard of for payment details to be worked out at a later date after the initial business proposal, so what exactly are you trying to say?
    8
  3871.  @jimgraham6722  You said: "China doesnt make the cut because it doesnt hold elections at all." Who says China doesn't hold elections at all? Elections in China are based on a hierarchical electoral system, whereby local People's Congresses are directly elected. All higher levels of People's Congresses up to the National People's Congress (NPC), the national legislature, are indirectly elected by the People's Congress of the level immediately below. Governors, mayors, and heads of counties, districts, townships and towns are in turn elected by the respective local People's Congresses. The President and the State Council are elected by the National People's Congress, which is made up of 2980 people. Yet you're making the claim that China doesn't hold elections at all?
    8
  3872.  @tuck295q  Former Malaysian PM Mahathir said that for thousands of years, China never conquered Malaysia. But the Portuguese came to Malaysia in 1509. Two years later, they came and conquered Malaysia. So he always felt that he's safer with China than with Europe.
    8
  3873.  @lktan224  Singapore's government is quite pro-U.S though. Singapore is the only ASEAN country to have slapped sanctions on Russia, thus earning Singapore a place on Russia's list of "unfriendly countries".
    8
  3874. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, rather than the uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US and its "allies".)
    8
  3875.  @bartonlee3594  In other words, between 50% and 70% of Chinese people supported the party and support for President Xi was between 65% and 70%? That's still a good gauge that Chinese people are generally optimistic and that many support the Chinese government and President Xi.
    8
  3876.  @smoochie3331  What does it matter that Cyrus Janssen received money from Chinese entities? If a Chinese company sponsor his trip to promote tourism in China, then what's wrong with Cyrus having received money from Chinese entities?
    8
  3877.  @fredtan1506  Agreed, but not just ASEAN countries alone but including the Central Asia countries (e.g Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, other -stan countries) and also South Asia countries (e.g India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, etc). It's already unfolding before our eyes, but who knows which country the U.S might target next?
    8
  3878. Digital currency is not facial recognition.
    8
  3879. Previously, Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy under authoritarian British colonial rule, there was virtually no elections in HK while it was under British rule. It's actually thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, where they had none before. For 150 years as a British colony.
    8
  3880. In the past, under Chinese laws, it was legal to harvest organs from prisoners on deathrow, only with the express permission of the convict himself or his family members, and the organs harvested will be given to the family or immediate relatives of the condemned criminal. And the organs are harvested after death, so where did you hear of the organs being harvested while you're still alive?
    8
  3881. +Haruka ino According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is impressive feat, considering that China is world's most populous country, yet managing to achieve 6.5% poverty and 96.5% literacy, according to global institutes like World Bank and UNESCO.
    8
  3882. I don't understand laowhy's logic here. He claims the apartment is in his wife's name, and he keeps on re-iterating many times how very difficult for him as foreigner to get things done. Then why the heck is laowhy in China during paperwork, while his wife is in America then? Why not ask his wife to do those things he keeps on complaining about?
    8
  3883.  @fcl3294  You asked: "Why is the date June 4 1989 blocked in the PRC.?" Who says this particular date is blocked in the PRC? I've entered 1989年6月4日 in Baidu, and the Chinese website displays that date on the calendar just fine, so why are you claiming that it's blocked in the PRC? Have you actually been to China and seen our calendars?
    8
  3884.    Taiwan's military drills got nothing on the mainland's. Check out this mainland live fire miltary drill video. Video: Live-fire drills! Watch Chinese military exercises youtu.be/UVMDi2TzZUc
    8
  3885.  @markgreen8045  It's apparent today that U.S-China relations have deteriorated to their lowest levels in recent years, and many like Cyrus are concerned that this could potentially lead to a hot war, which would not only be disastrous for our two countries, but for the whole world as well. Cyrus is clearly fighting for peace, his videos promote the positive message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls". So if you're claiming that Cyrus is a CPC tool, then are you saying that Cyrus' message of peace is the CPC's message as well? Then isn't that a good thing?
    8
  3886.  @markgreen8045  Since apparently you watched Cyrus' previous videos, in which videos has Cyrus ever been a warmonger? His consistent message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" is a positive one for the world, and you're accusing Cyrus of helping the CPC spread this message? Then isn't it a good thing to promote this peaceful message? The alternative message (of going to war) is unthinkable if it does manifest, and it's going to be a disaster for not only our two countries, but also the rest of the world if US-China relations deteriorate to the point where a hot conflict breaks out. Cyrus is fighting for peace by helping Western audiences understand China better, then isn't this a positive result for maintaining world peace?
    8
  3887. ​ @sammyo2583 Of course. He's the founding father of the People's Republic of China, and reunifying our divided country where even the previous Kuomintang administration failed to do so for decades. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would most likely still be weak and divided, fighting among ourselves, instead of being strong and unified.
    8
  3888. The USA accuse mainland China of potentially abusing the Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now scrapped), then USA turn around and abuse their own extradition bill with Canada with Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou. The USA accuse China of potentially abusing extradition bill, then they turn around and abuse their extradition bill with Canada themselves. The sheer irony!
    8
  3889. The Uighurs in Xinjiang are actually doing much better with less Islamic extremism. And VICE News do their filming at night in the dark, because they can't find anything wrong with Kashgar or Urumiqi, and they get some distorted voice (the mysterious Uighur interview onboard the train) and yet people still believe some mysterious words from an unnamed voice?
    8
  3890.  @libra6492  Photographs and videos show that the rocket part faces the northeast, which means that the missile may have arrived from the southwest, which is the direction of Ukrainian controlled territory such as Dobropillia. So it's possible that this attack on Kramatorsk was orchestrated by Ukrainian forces themselves.
    8
  3891.  @squashype9838  Those Tochka-U missiles in the Russian-Belarus exercise are launched from the Belarus Army, whereas Russia has gotten rid of all its Tochka-U missiles. Besides, they have more advanced variants like the Iskander missile, then why'd would they want to use Tochka-U?
    8
  3892.  @libra6492  According to the serial number of the Tochka-U in Kramatorsk, it can be traced back to the 19th Missile Brigade of Ukrainian Armed Forces. This is reported on Italian media:youtu.be/sWLl0aGQEPw
    8
  3893. If the ageing workforce retires, won't that free up jobs for the younger unemployed workers?
    8
  3894.  @MarkYeung1  The question is whether the US Congress would allow Tik Tok that's not merged with Douyin and thus, not under the control of the Chinese government. What has China's free Internet even got to do with this?
    8
  3895.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "The fact that so many mainland Chinese users are participating in the comment section..." Since mainland Chinese are in the comment section (according to you) then what communication issues are you talking about?
    8
  3896.  @MmmM-uo6ti  Did I ever mention the Palestine-Israel conflict in my post? Why are you comparing them with Russia-Ukraine then?
    8
  3897. (Source: Wikipedia: Electric car use by country)
    8
  3898. Many short-term visitors to China aren't able to use WeChat pay because one of the requirement is to set up a Chinese bank account (which many tourists lack). However, digital Renminbi could potentially help visitors since no Chinese bank account is required to use digital Yuan. And the tourists still get to enjoy all the benefits of mobile-payments in China, without having to open a Chinese bank account, thanks to digital RMB.
    8
  3899. The border dispute is caused by British drawing the McMahon Line (named after British cartographer Henry McMahon) between India and China without consulting historical boundaries prior between the two. Today, India still sticks to this line that was drawn during colonial times, and that's why the border dispute remains unresolved.
    8
  3900.  @richarde.halliburton8022  There are a total 8 political parties apart from the Communist Party of China (CPC) 中国共产党（中共）and they are: -China Zhi Gong Party (CZGP) 中国致公党（致公党） -Chinese Peasants' and Workers' Democratic Party (CPWDP) 中国农工民主党（农工党 -China Democratic League (CDL) 中国民主同盟（民盟） -Jiusan Society (JS) 九三学社 -China National Democratic Construction Association (CNDCA) 中国民主建国会（民建） -China Association for Promoting Democracy (CAPD) 中国民主促进会（民进） -Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League (TDSGL) 台湾民主自治同盟（台盟） -Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang (RCCK) 中国国民党革命委员会（民革） …… Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_China#Parties
    8
  3901.  @aredtomato8957  It means Philippines' foreign policy often flips and changes its stances.
    8
  3902.  stantheman276  You said: "I mean we all know muslims are so peaceful and wonderful. Just look at how peaceful they went to a concert in Moscow recently." The gunmen in the Crocus concert aren't even Muslims. They made Shahada gesture with the wrong hand. Muslims never make Shahada (oaths) with the left hand, which is considered considered impure.
    8
  3903.  @bartonlee3594  Firstly, Ukraine was not democracy, even according to Western standards. Freedom House, a nonpartisan think tank that ranks democracies, has labeled Ukraine “a transitional or hybrid regime” in one recent report and “partly free” in a second report. The Economist Intelligence Unit, which in its 2021 Democracy Index listed Ukraine as a “hybrid regime.” Secondly, Ukraine has been increasingly undemocratic ever since the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukoyvch by the USA and installing their own U.S puppet government into Kiev. Several opposition leaders have been arrested, such as Viktor Medvedchuk, who heads the Opposition Platform for Life party, the largest opposition force in parliament. Thirdly, you spoke of Russians being "deprived of access to accurate information" well that's because the EU blocked RT News and Sputnik Radio, depriving Westerners of accurate information regarding the conflict from the Russian side, so Russia has decided to retaliate by blocking BBC and other Western news outlets. In other words, this was brought upon by the EU's blocking of RT.
    8
  3904.  @oceanbreeze89  So if Taiwan is already an independent country, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there something controlling Taiwan and preventing it from joining the UN like an independent country?
    8
  3905.  Tiananmen Square MASSACARE  Do Canadians even know what occupation the two Michaels do? Whereas everyone knows Meng Wanzhou is Huawei's CFO.
    8
  3906.  @MarkYeung1  Perhaps some form of National Education should be introduced into Hong Kong's school curriculum that teaches kids their Chinese roots. Hong Kong was a British colony for over 150 years during which Hong Kong curriculum is decided by their colonial masters, and it will take some time to undo the mental damage But then, there's overseas Hong Kong that retain their colonial mentality even after leaving Hong Kong for the West, and it's going to be extremely difficult for them to decolonise their minds while they are living in the West.
    8
  3907.  @andrenogueira5058  Greater China dominates global microchip production, controlling around half of the worldwide export market. Here's a list of countries/states by integrated circuit exports in 2019: 1. Hong Kong, China ($134,483 million) 2. Mainland China ($102,187 million) 3. Taiwan, China ($100,408 million) 4. South Korea ($79,082 million) 5. Singapore ($76,868 million) 6. Malaysia ($44,794 million) 7. United States ($40,099 million) 8. Japan ($27,791 million) 9. Vietnam ($26,084 million) 10. Philippines ($18,991 million) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by integrated circuit exports So the world already relies on China for integrated circuits, why is it the last thing the world wants?
    8
  3908. Ancient China invented paper currency, and the rest of the world gradually followed and adopted paper currency. Now China has launched digital currency, it's only a matter of time for the rest of the world to follow suit.
    8
  3909.  @INTJ791  Again, I'm not the owner of this channel, it's Cyrus Janssen's channel so what makes you think I have the power to censor your comment? Also, you think Cyrus is free to read every comment and censor yours? Could it be because YouTube classify Cyrus channel differently than other slightly pro China channels (i.e jagat review) and censor his channel's comments?
    8
  3910.  @FAILkipedia  "They wiped full cities, and killed tens of thousands of civilians." Which city has been fully wiped by the Russian forces, you tell me. I'm willing to hear you out.
    8
  3911.  @UnimpressedGoose  What's wrong with my name 神州 Shenzhou? I am Chinese and I am proud to be Chinese, so why can't I use a Chinese name then?
    8
  3912. When China invented the paper banknote, the rest of the world soon followed with their own paper currency. Now China is rolling out our own digital Yuan, eventually the rest of the world will follow with their own digital currency. History has shown this to be true.
    8
  3913. China demonstrated anti satellite capabilities in 2007, by taking out a satellite in orbit using missile launched from the ground. How will the rest of the war pan out if China destroys Indian army satellites?
    8
  3914.  @MarkYeung1  Sadly, Vancouver in Canada has seen a huge upsurge in anti-Asian hate crimes targeting Asian Canadians. It has gotten so bad, that Vancouver has been nicknamed the Anti-Asian Hate Crime Capital of North America, seeing more hate incidents than the top 10 most populous U.S cities combined. According to Bloomberg news: Last year, more anti-Asian hate crimes were reported to police in Vancouver, a city of 700,000 people, than in the top 10 most populous U.S. cities combined. With almost 1 out of every 2 residents of Asian descent in British Columbia experiencing a hate incident in the past year, the region is confronting an undercurrent of racism that runs as long and deep as the historical links stretching across the Pacific.
    8
  3915.  @brianplum1825  "It never even had a Nobel winner in the sciences." Mainland Chinese scientist Tu YouYou (屠呦呦) discovered artemisinin (also known as qīnghāosù 青蒿素) and dihydroartemisinin, used to treat malaria, a breakthrough in twentieth-century tropical medicine, saving millions of lives in South China, Southeast Asia, Africa, and South America. For her work, Tu received the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.
    8
  3916.  @klhilde  China has 5000 years of history and our culture is far too expansive to be destroyed completely. The previous Mongol and Manchu conquerors of China tried to wipe out Han culture, but ended up assimilating into Chinese culture instead. China still have many historical monuments like The Great Wall of China, The Forbidden City, Qin Emperor Tomb, Terracotta Army, The Grand Canal (world's oldest and longest artificial river) and many more. In fact, according UNESCO World Heritage sites, China has 55 world heritage sites, ranking top in the world, so China has more UNESCO World Heritage sites than any other country in the world. Source: China has 55, ranking top in the world wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Heritage_Sites_in_China
    8
  3917.  @klhilde  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china), etc, that were in high demand by the rest of the ancient world. China has always been under authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the Imperial Court, so how is CCP not the rightful heir of Chinese culture? In 1911, Dr. Sun overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established Republic of China, but was eventually overthrown by Mao who proclaimed People's Republic of China in 1949, so how is CCP not the rightful heir of Chinese culture?
    8
  3918.  @faithfulwarrior8051  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    8
  3919.  @COYS-o2i  Could you present evidence that Shenzhen gave up and just lied?
    8
  3920.  @orangebanana845  If Westerner goes to Islamic countries, say Saudi Arabia for example, they obey the host country's laws, like women wearing Muslim headveil in public, must always be escorted by male relative or family member, and that women are forbidden to drive. Some Westerners might even convert to Islam But if Muslims immigrants come to Western country, they can do whatever they want. Muslim men can marry multiple wives, and Muslim women continue to wear headveil in public, instead of adapting to their host country culture. Muslim men don't even remove their hats if they step into Christian church for example.
    8
  3921. Instead of "In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king," Zeihan is more like "the blind leading the blind."
    8
  3922. China has extended the One-China, Two-Systems (like with Hong Kong and Macau) to Taiwan as well, allowing Taiwan to keep their government, while remaining part of China, but Taiwan rejected it and hasn't offered a counterproposal of its own. China is the only country in the world willing to have two different political systems within our borders, and no Western country ever considered having multiple systems in their country. It's as if both North Korea and South Korea agree to be a single country, Korea, but still allow both countries to keep their own government.
    8
  3923. Also, the Taiwanese athletes were warmly welcomed at the Asian Games opening ceremony in Hangzhou.
    8
  3924. @Komrade Karebear Baken Maller Instead of relying on US chips, Huawei has unveiled its new chipset Kirin 990, the world's first 5G-integrated chipset at the IFA (Internationale Funkausstellung Berlin) 2019 in Berlin. Video: Huawei introduces Kirin 990, the world's first 5G-integrated chipset youtu.be/TNKtG3t22Po
    8
  3925.  @MarkYeung1  So literally anyone can be detained in Canada (for nearly 3 years in Meng's case)?
    8
  3926.  @suppeeps5393  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    8
  3927. +Mudit Singh Exactly what has India to offer those countries at all? China is big trading partners with Japan, Vietnam and we are developing better business relations with Philippines, so why do you claim that these countries will break economic relations with China for India's sake?
    8
  3928.  @georgeshibley9529  According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore ( hrw.org/asia/singapore ) Singapore’s political environment is stifling. Citizens face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. In 2017, the country tightened the already strict limits on public assemblies contained in the Public Order Act, which requires police permits for any “cause-related” assembly outside the closely monitored “Speakers’ Corner.” The rights of the LGBT community are severely curtailed: sexual relations between men remains a criminal offense, and there are no legal protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. That's sounds almost exactly like China's political system in many ways.
    8
  3929.  @maskva-u6f  "Why China rewrite the Bible?" Since when? China prints the most Bibles in the world thanks to Chinese company Amity Printing Co. (APC) produces an average of 70 Bibles per minute. Chances are that the Bible in your local church was actually printed in China.
    8
  3930.  @MarkYeung1  How does making mistake make Mao into a bad administrator? Everyone makes mistakes, does that mean that they are all bad administrators? Yet under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population size, from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Isn't that why China has became the world's most populous country? How is that the work of a bad administrator?
    8
  3931. @comment sense The Kangaroo is also a cute animal and literally represents Australia, yet there are Australians who eat Kangaroo meat. So are the Australians not human too? I mean, who are you to impose your culinary beliefs onto other cultures?
    8
  3932.  @makeromaniagreatagain9697  What makes you think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your lands and spending money on your economies. Your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 China now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people are oppressed. Chinese people can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    8
  3933.  @Naikomi95  China has 1.4 billion people how can one person like me affect their adult literacy rates?
    8
  3934.  @user-sp9hp1tj7v  Who says the kids can never leave or see their families? Didn't you see the dialogue between the reporter and the kid at 29:18 ? There are 13 students who live on campus, so doesn't that imply that the rest of the students don't live in school, and that go back home when the school day ends? VICE News is purposely trying to mislead you and paint a negative picture of Xinjiang's schools that's all.
    8
  3935.  @ebolmao4129  Why I defend it so hardly? Because everyone only seems to know the all the bad and negative stuff about China. So I'd thought I'll enlighten people on the good things China is doing as well as some of China's achievements is all. And I try as much as possible to reply to other people's posts, but I can't possibly answer each post directed at me. So what makes you think I "left everything else without an answer" like you said? I have given my answers to as many responses as possible, but its the other people that just refuse to accept my answer (even after I provided evidence where possible) then why are you claiming I left everything else without an answer?
    8
  3936.  @basedbro2578  You're wrong. Most countries in the world recognize the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China. Even according to the 1972 Shanghai Communique, the document pledged that the United States "acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China" and that the United States Government does not challenge that position.
    8
  3937.  @KayyHong  No Action, Talk Only (NATO)
    8
  3938.  @koblongata  The United States spend 20 years in Afghanistan introducing their Western style democracy to the people, and yet the people of Afghanistan rejected U.S democracy despite tasting it for 2 decades. As for China, over 50 years ago, literally nobody expected China to succeed or play an important role in global affairs, yet fast forward till today and look at how far China has come under the leadership of the Communist Party of China? Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    8
  3939.  @koblongata  Chinese universities train more STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) graduates than any other in the world. Here's a list of countries with the most STEM graduates in 2016 according to World Economic Forum. The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates (2016) 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: World Economic Forum This implies that China is expected to play a larger role in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics fields in the future, given the sheer volume of STEM graduates.
    8
  3940.  @koblongata  It's no secret today that America is in decline, and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set and many economists firmly believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United States someday in the foreseeable future. But since the 19th century, many have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the future is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    8
  3941.  @koblongata  "神州 Shenzhou No, a lot of people want China to be great, but not in this way." Why can't China be great this way? China found a political system that works for our country, whereas Western institutions of democracy are falling apart and crumbling from within, so should China abandon our working political system for a failing Western-style democracy? If anything, China is living proof that not all countries have to adopt Western Style democracy to be successful. "Cutting off ties with Russia is paramount." Russia is our close ally, whatever for should China cut off ties with one of our closest partners? Contrary to popular belief, it's not China that supplies Russia with weapons, it's the reverse, and China is Russia's 2nd largest buyer of weapons, so why should China cut off ties with such a good partner? You naively think the Western countries will accept China just because of that? "And maybe try and save Afghanistan women first, be the light of the world instead of darkness." Who created the mess that is Afghanistan in the first place? Answer: The United States of America, then why should China be the one to clear up the USA blunders? During the U.S botched withdrawal of Afghanistan, the Afghan peoples made their choice, choosing the Taliban over "Western style democracy". The 300,000-member strong Afghan Army choose to surrender to Taliban, instead of fighting and dying for the sake of "Western democracy", then it's their choice to be ruled by Taliban. You want to save Afghanistan? Then tell the United States to unfreeze the $7 billion dollars worth of Afghan assets that belongs to the people of Afghanistan so that they have money to rebuild their devastated economy.
    8
  3942.  @koblongata  $7 billion is a lot of money, especially to an impoverished country like Afghanistan, and Taliban did not bomb the World Trade Center in the USA, it was al-Qaeda that did so.
    8
  3943.  @koblongata  "Of course, China stood next to Taliban and took photos before their invasion" Taliban did not invade Afghanistan, this is their home for crying out loud. And Mike Pompeo stood next to Taliban and took photos, the why don't you blame Pompeo and USA?
    8
  3944.  @koblongata  My kids are probably going to live a far better life than me. Living standards are improving in China even as we speak. Many Chinese are optimistic and look forward to a bright future. On the contrary, many Westerners are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future, especially for their kids.
    8
  3945.  u wot  China is our country, and if you want to do business in China, then of course you have to abide by our rules while in China. Nobody force American companies to come to China and set up shop, but if you want to do business here, you'll have to adhere to our rules. Our country, Our rules. The way I see it, it can be summed up in the following dialogue. USA: We want YOU, China, to make our goods cheap and give us an edge over the competition. China: Sure thing, but we'll need access to your technology, your blueprints and sensitive information, if you want us to build the product to spec USA: Done!
    8
  3946.  @billyehh  This is how Kishore Mahbubani obtained his data. "Today America is the only major developed country where the average income of the bottom fifty percent has gone down over a thirty year period. Sadly, this stagnation of income has also resulted in a lot of human pain and suffering, as documented by two Princeton University economists, Anne Case and Angus Deaton." ... (Taken from Kishore Mahbubani's website.)
    8
  3947.  @DonutsIceCreamAndCottenCandy  China supports peaceful cooperation with the West, but not Western military imperialism. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is a real threat to global peace and stability here.
    8
  3948. The countries that own the most farmland in Australia are the Netherlands (1,600 hectares), United States of America (1,200 hectares), United Kingdom (900 hectares) and China (800 hectares) according to a government report on foreign ownership of agricultural land.
    8
  3949. In Western culture, wearing a mask is seen as being selfish, that you're trying to protect yourself from catching flu from others. In Eastern culture, wearing a mask is seen as being polite, that you're trying to protect others from catching your flu.
    8
  3950. There are many competent people in China yes, but still, you can't have all of them leading the country now can you? The government has many ongoing 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 15-year plans, 20-year plans, etc to chart out out China's future and to achieve specific goals in 2020, 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040, 2050, etc, so China needs a strong hand at the helm to see these long-term plans to fruition But Western government such as USA, only have short term plans, because their presidential term is 4-8 years only. So at the most, the leaders can only make plans that expire after 8 years, because there is no guarantee that they'll be in power to see long term plans through. As for rebellion to remove a leader, USA has also done it before by invading Middle East and cutting off the country's heads like Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein. Next on the list appears to be the Assad Regime.
    8
  3951. @Ben Benito "Lol she was arrested for sanction violation and bank fraud." Which Canadian sanction did Meng violate?
    8
  3952. As Chinese myself, I personally found many Hollywood movies to be severely lacking in Asian actors. Asian actors (Chinese,Japanese, Koreans) are simply underrepresented in Hollywood, often casted into cliche roles like martial artist, triad thug, nerdy but social inept guy, hacker, etc. Asian actresses often get roles as damsel in distress (to be saved by Caucasian male lead) or prostitutes, dragon ladies, massage parlor workers, other sexualized roles etc. Also, there's also "white-washing" of Asian characters, that is, the casting of Caucasian actor/actress to portray a character of Asian descent on film. Hopefully, China's influence on Hollywood can grant more prominent roles to Asian actors/actresses.
    8
  3953.  @robertoosido1232  "Even though I'm not Chinese I can feel your feelings" So you're not even Chinese then how can you speak on behalf of Chinese? Surveys in Taiwan have shown that only a minority (5.6 percent) of people in Taiwan want independence, while the overwhelming majority (87 percent) want the status quo to continue.
    8
  3954. ​ @niewazneniewazne1890  Previously, Hong Kong was a British colony in which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy/autonomy. For 150 years, the people of Hong Kong did not get to vote for their favorite leaders while it was still a British colony. It's only during the period of the 1997 handover, that Hong Kong people finally get democracy/autonomy under the One Country, Two Systems policy (put forth by mainland China). So how is mainland China impeding on Hong Kong autonomy? Hong Kong has held more elections AFTER being returned back to China, than they ever did for 150 years as a British colony.
    8
  3955. It's a pity that Rhone is unable to do anything about that receding hairline. I'm just kidding, you look great and most people tune in to listen to your words of wisdom, not for your appearance. Stay healthy and keep up the good work!
    8
  3956.  @knowitall5913  Why resort to ad hominen attacks against Fernando?
    8
  3957.  @Raumweiter  You said: "I think that area is part of Russia now, am i right?" The 2014 Crimea Referendum voting results indicate that an overwhelming majority (96.77%) of Crimeans voted to join the Russian Federation, so isn't this the will of the majority of people living in Crimea?
    8
  3958.  @SwedeenXBL  You said: "神州 Shenzhou I wouldn't count Hrabove as Ukrainian territory while it was under control by Russian separtist groups" Does that mean you consider Crimea as Russian territory for those same reasons?
    8
  3959.  @jeffjohnson5053  Could you elaborate why you think China today is quite the opposite? Poverty alleviation and economic growth remains the forefront of Chinese government policy.
    8
  3960. True that. Russia stands to learn a lot from China's peacetime supply chains and apply them to the Ukraine conflict. In return, China could also learn how Russia manages its wartime supply chains, in case China finds itself in a similar situation in the future.
    8
  3961. At that time, China was starving and dirt-poor country, suffering from high child malnutrition, high child mortality rates, lack of schools, lack of healthcare, etc. Why have multiple kids per family when there's not enough food to feed them, not enough schools to send them to, not enough hospitals to provide adequate healthcare, and so on? Why not focus all your resources into raising a single healthy kid past childhood and get him into a good school?
    8
  3962.  @skyeagle3123  Look, I'm willing to hear you out, and I want to understand your side as well. You mentioned the Communist Party of China deliberately kept Covid-19 a secret, well, then why'd China report a mysterious pneumonia-like illness to the World Health Organization on 31st Dec 2019? Why'd China published several articles in The Lancet scientific journal about Chinese scientist findings about Covid-19? It's clear that China had given warning to Western countries about the impending pandemic once Covid-19 arrived on their shores, but most Western countries just ignored China's warnings that's all, so how did the CPC keep the novel coronavirus a secret? Look, China even lockdown Wuhan and built two temporary hospitals (1,000-bed hospital Huoshenshan in 10 days and 1,600-bed Leishenshan in 12 days) even Western Media had coverage of China's hospital construction. This should already sound off alarm bells in Western countries to jump to action, yet they did nothing. Then why seemingly blame China when it's your own countries failure to heed China's alarms? Also, the World Health Organization sent a coronavirus origins investigation team to Wuhan on Jan 2021, and they visited Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market and Wuhan Institute of Virology. But their findings indicate that the virus entered the Wuhan Market from elsewhere, and they've all but dismiss the lab leak theory as highly unlikely. I don't understand what you mean when you say "Chinese people have no rights to do what they want on the net". I mean, China literally has the largest Internet population in the world at 1 billion Internet users. List of countries by number of Internet users 1. China (1,010,740,000 Internet users) 2. India (833,710,000 Internet users) 3. United States of America (312,320,000 Internet users) 4. Indonesia (212,354,070 Internet users) 5. Bangladesh (129,180,000 Internet users) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by number of Internet users
    8
  3963.  @skyeagle3123  Why do you want China to fall? Over 50 years ago, nobody expected "communist" China to succeed, yet fast forward till today and look at how far China has come under the Communist Party of China. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having the world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    8
  3964.  @hannibalwantsahuggrande3433  "How can a one party system be a democracy? Please explain." The one party in China has to represent all 100% of Chinese people's interests (or at least 80-90%) since they are fully responsible for China's future and there is no other party to blame for failures. Whereas in a two-party system like the United States, there is only partial representation, say about 51% of American's interests, when either the Democrats or the Republicans get into power. The two parties are also more interested in sabotaging each other's plans and claiming credit for America's success, while pushing the blame for America's woes onto the other party. (In reality, the two parties probably represent less that 51% of American's interests, the real percentage is closer to 1% of American interests, if you know what I mean)
    8
  3965.  @sjv9147s  Yes, specifically Sun Zi's quote that "All warfare is based on deception."
    8
  3966. I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    8
  3967.  @andrenogueira5058  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    8
  3968.  @ColoniaMurder20  Gautama Buddha was born in a region that corresponds to modern day Nepal, not India.
    8
  3969. There's an article in The Conversation which talks about how 15 out of 20 of Australia's biggest companies were all majority U.S-owned. Using company ownership data from Bloomberg, I analysed the ownership of Australia’s 20 biggest companies a few days after the 2019 federal election in May. Of those 20, 15 were majority-owned by US-based investors. Three more were at least 25% US-owned. According to my analysis, all four of our big banks are majority-owned by American investors. The Commonwealth Bank of Australia, the nation’s biggest company, is more than 60% owned by American-based investors. So too are Woolworths and Rio Tinto. BHP, once known as “the Big Australian”, is 73% owned by American-based investors. Source: The Conversation: Worried about agents of foreign influence? Just look at who owns Australia’s biggest companies
    8
  3970.  @CyrusJanssen  It may be presumptuous of me, but I would like to congratulate you, Cyrus. You have joined the growing ranks of Americans who've realized that the U.S political system itself is rigged, and not in favor of the average American citizen. You seem to know that the sickness is the system itself, but you intend to heal it, and do your part to improve America's political system. That's a goal that I can respect.
    8
  3971.  @comeforaride  Me too. It's just that the OP hasn't heard of him, which goes to show how the western media is trying to keep a hush on Patrick.
    8
  3972.  @Andy-P  How would you know if the investigations won't be as restrictive? For example, can you guarantee that the USA will allow an independent investigation into the "mysterious pneumonia like" vaping deaths in Fort Detrick? Without restrictions?
    8
  3973. Even if you disagree Chinese government system, China been peaceful for 30 years and have not been involved in any major war since 1979. But USA today is still bombing countries in Middle East, even in 21st century, so how is this considered lesser of two evils?
    8
  3974. President Trump has stated many times in his public addresses that China's cooperation is essential to denuclearisation on the Korean peninsula.
    8
  3975.  @GabrielEddy  "Also, no opportunity for protests in China," Tens of thousands of protests occur each year in China. In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010.
    8
  3976.  @GabrielEddy  "I need data from 2020 and 2024, and I need it right now." On Nov 2022, China was still under zero Covid policy, but a fire at an apartment block in Xinjiang resulted in deaths. Chinese citizens took to the streets to protest the zero Covid policy. As a result of these protests, China eventually lifted the zero Covid policy by the end of 2022.
    8
  3977.  @keepingittight  True. There are also other terms like OREO (white on the inside, black on the outside) and COCONUTS (white on the inside, brown on the outside) as well. Strangely, all the terms are related to food.
    8
  3978. The U.S's democratic experiment in Afghanistan ended in failure, after 20 years of experimentation, spending trillions of dollars in installing a U.S puppet government in Afghanistan and training/equipping the Afghan military. The democratic government in Afghanistan collapsed like a house of cards, the democratically-elected Afghan President Ghani fled his post, carrying vehicular loads of American cash into exile, and the 300,000-strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban with minimal bloodshed. If anything, Afghanistan proves that U.S.A can't just force their own democratic political system onto another country and expect it to work.
    8
  3979.  @nickxenix  YouTube does have a mute function, just press m to mute.
    8
  3980.  @xerozero976  "神州 Shenzhou Only 165 million dollars for 53million homeless????" Where did you get your bloated figure of 53 million homeless? There are about 38 million people affected by floods in China, so where did you get your exaggerated figure of 53 million homeless? Source: China Says over 38 Million Affected by Historic Floods as Typhoon hits breitbart.com/asia/2020/08/04/china-says-over-38-million-affected-by-historic-floods-as-typhoon-hits/
    8
  3981.  @xerozero976  About Capitalism versus Communism, in the United States, the US corporations control the U.S government for profit, waging wars in the Middle East to control the oil, for example. Whereas in China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit. For example, capitalism favors monopolies, like Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon, dominating their respective industries and eliminating competition. China actually has an anti-monopoly law to clamp down on anti-competitive practices in the industry, even Jack Ma of Alibaba is being investigated under China's anti-monopoly law. Source: China targets Alibaba with anti-monopoly investigation theguardian.com/business/2020/dec/24/china-targets-alibaba-with-anti-monopoly-investigation
    8
  3982.  @xerozero976  You said: "What American system the USA wants to be imposed on any other country?" The USA imposes their Western brand of democracy on Vietnam (Vietnam War) and Korea (Korean War) and as well as during Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Yemen War, and so on.
    8
  3983.  @kus4kus4  How to define "uncommon animal"? The French eat snails and horsemeat, British eat rabbit stew and Australians eat kangaroo meat, so do you mean by uncommon food?
    8
  3984. I feel the same way. Whenever I bring up China's accomplishments, many Westerners (but not all) just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill, just because my views happen to differ from theirs. When I started talking about the Ukraine crisis, similarly, many started labelling me a Putin puppet for my views.
    8
  3985.  @rh906  China's ambassador to France certainly speaks French. And why are you suddenly referring to Chinese people as Pandaren?
    8
  3986. @Karen Xitler Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. Yet he's being labelled a mass murderer in the West, when his intention was not murder?
    8
  3987.  @fl338  In 1958, the Yellow River flooded which coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward and the flood water level was so high that it rose up to the top of the levee in several places. Mass starvation resulted due to the destroyed crops This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. It was reported as the most severe flood since 1933.
    8
  3988. ​ @d9918  Vietnamese PM Pham Van Dong had acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were Chinese territory, in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. ... (Source: Wikipedia: 1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai)
    8
  3989. Well said. The combination of a Socialism + Meritocracy + Confucianism + Democratic political structure is basically "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics", thank you for helping break it down to better understand it.
    8
  3990. During 19th century, Britain was the world's largest economy and the Pound Sterling became the world's reserve currency. During 20th century, USA overtook Britain as the world's largest economy and the U.S Dollar became the global reserve. Now in the 21st century, China's economy is expected to surpass the U.S's someday in the foreseeable future, so it's expected that the Renminbi could potentially become the next reserve currency. Who knows?
    8
  3991. Marco Polo also brought back the idea of Chinese noodles to Italy, and Italian pasta was born.
    8
  3992. Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    8
  3993.  @petehagen8638  About the so-called "IP theft" and "commercial espionage" let's be clear that when the Western companies came to invest in China and set up shop here, one of the conditions put forth by China was that Western companies would either partner up with a local Chinese company, or agree to transfer technology to Chinese companies. Those Western companies like Nike and Apple agreed to this condition, so how is that theft of IP when Western companies signed the agreement to transfer their tech to Chinese companies? It's not nice to agree to the business transaction, only to later turn around and accuse China of stealing IP and spying.
    8
  3994. @F L It should be the CPC, not the CCP
    8
  3995. Peng Shuai was clearly avoiding the public eye for weeks, but Western media are behaving like paparazzi and trying to expose her private life for all the world to see, that's why eventually she appeared on video call to express her desire for privacy.
    8
  3996. He wants access to Chinese EV battery technology.
    8
  3997. In the original scenario, Canadians certainly aren't laughing.
    8
  3998. I have to question why at 14:00 you quoted an article from the American Chamber of Commerce about Americans leaving Tokyo because Covid restrictions, and that only 3% of their jobs can be filled by the local talent in Tokyo, and somehow apply that to China? China is NOT Tokyo obviously and I don't understand the logic of applying an article about Tokyo and thinking the same thing will happen in China.
    8
  3999.  @MrBAchompBAchomp  You said in America you don't have to worry about your government welding you in your home, but the end result is the virus spread like wildfire. In 2020, it was recorded that the US has just 4% of the world's population but 25% of all COVID cases. Not to mention also being the country with the highest number of COVID-related deaths.
    8
  4000. Tiangong-1 was launched in 2011, originally with expected operational lifespan of 2 years. But its already 2018, and the spacestation has long since been decommissioned and is reentering Earth's atmosphere after its service. Just like when America's Skylab create news sensation back in 1979 during its reentry, this is the natural conclusion to after the spacestation outlived its usefulness.
    8
  4001.  @dziku2222  The International Poverty Line as defined by the World Bank, is an income of $1.90 per day. The Chinese government uses a poverty line of about $2.25 a day which is actually higher than World Bank's definition of poverty, so how is that lowering standards? As for China fight against desertification, satellite data from NASA has reported that the world has more vegetation today than it did 20 years ago and that one-third of the world's greening is due to human activity in China and India.
    8
  4002. Jesse Mac China has environmental problems but at least the government is taking steps to remedy the situation, such as selling more electric vehicles here. But President Trump is planning to bring back coal plants and he even opted out of the 2017 Paris Climate Agreement, so that USA isn't restricted by CO2 emissions.
    8
  4003. It's a combination of the “Red Scare” (fear of communism) and the “Yellow Peril” (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling fears towards China in the West. Since the 19th century, many have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many (but not all) to fathom.
    8
  4004. China is among the first to extend congratulations to Putin on his reelection. While Russia has just successfully completed its election, Ukraine decided it will not be holding any elections this year.
    8
  4005.  Cheng-Tso Hsieh  It is indisputable fact that Taiwan island experienced the most economic growth under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, whereas after democratic reforms were adopted, Taiwan's economy began to stagnate, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising, and various other economic woes. Taiwan's democratization wasn't organic, it was a U.S-led initiative, stirring up grassroots organizations to fight for democracy. I mean, the people in Taiwan had been prosperous under KMT rule, why the sudden shift towards democracy out of the blue?
    8
  4006.  @currentchannel3452  David Fincher’s 1999 movie,《Fight Club》is based on author Chuck Palahniuk's 1996 novel of the same name. China’s ending is actually closer to Palahniuk’s original vision for the ending of “Fight Club,” as written in his 1996 book. As Palahniuk told TMZ while reacting to China’s censorship, “The irony is that the way the Chinese have changed it is they’ve aligned the ending almost exactly with the ending of the book, as opposed to Fincher’s ending, which was the more spectacular visual ending. So in a way, the Chinese brought the movie back to the book a little bit.” Palahniuk also said it was interesting that suddenly everyone cared about a censored “Fight Club” ending when he’s spent nearly his entire career fighting censorship and bans when it comes to his books. “My books are heavily banned throughout the U.S.,” Palahniuk said. “The Texas prison system refuses to carry my books in their libraries. A lot of public schools and most private schools refuse to carry my books. But it’s only an issue once China changes the end of a movie? I’ve been putting up with book banning for a long time.”
    8
  4007.  Mike Chan  China did not steal those technologies, it was Western companies that agreed to transfer technology to Chinese companies, as part of the terms of setting up shop in China. Nobody point a gun at Western companies and force them to transfer technology, they are always welcome to pack up and take their business elsewhere if they do not want to comply with Chinese laws while in China.
    8
  4008.  @michaelkatz275  "神州 Shenzhou Yes that's right. China repossessed the port which they built in Sri Lanka when they couldn't make the payments." Read the report again, Sri Lanka’s debt distress arose not from Chinese lending, but from excessive borrowing on Western-dominated capital markets. Also, Hambantota port was leased to a Chinese company for 99 years for $1.1 billion, in which Sri Lanka used to pay down debts to other creditors and boost its foreign reserves. But after 99 years, the lease would have expired and the port will be returned back to Sri Lanka. If anything, it looks as though Sri Lanka is set to benefit in the long-term, once the lease expires in 99 years and the port is returned.
    8
  4009.  @chadgaming8071  The U.S build an Afghan Army to defend their ideology, but the 300,000-strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban in just weeks with minimal resistance, while the democratically elected Afghan President Ghani fled the country with carloads of U.S cash. If anything, it shows how the people of Afghanistan did not want to fight for democracy like you claims. Also, the UN General-Secretary Kofi Annan has said the Iraq War was illegal and violated UN Charter. The U.S found no evidence of WMDs in Iraq and according to Iraq Body Count, some 200,000 Iraqi civilians have been killed as a result of the Iraq War.
    8
  4010. BBC doesn't want to show the entire picture. They rather focus on the poor's living conditions, than on the resettlement village that the government provided for them. So BBC frame China according to their lenses.
    8
  4011. Many Indians (but not all) tend to suffer from the "colonial mentality" long after India has been decolonized. The "decolonization of the mind" needs to take place to heal the mental damage inflicted by the colonizer on the minds of the colonized. Only then can Indians break free of their colonial past.
    8
  4012.  @HarrySmith-hr2iv  Railways and roads in India were built to serve the British colonial interests and not the interests of the people of India. Many countries have built railways and roads, without having had to be colonized in order to do so. The infrastructure in India were mainly designed to carry raw materials from the hinterland to be shipped to Britain (to be turned into manufactured goods which the British then sold back to India) and that the railways serving as transportation of passengers is merely incidental In fact, the Indian railways were built with massive incentives offered by Britain to British investors, guaranteed out of Indian taxes paid by India.
    8
  4013.  @semiramisubw4864  Much of the West are the U.S vassal state. Take the 5 Eyes countries for example and Biden Administration had initially declared that the USA will be boycotting the 2022 Beijing Olympics diplomatically and the rest of the 5 Eyes countries jumped on board the boycott bandwagon. Now USA changed its mind and they are sending 18 officials to attend the Olympics in Beijing, then how do the remaining 5 Eyes countries explain their reasons for boycotting the games? Because of "Red Scare" and "Yellow Peril" mindset.
    8
  4014. Tik Tok's CEO faced much disrespect and discrimination at the US Congress hearing, even though he is from Singapore.
    8
  4015.  @rationalist805  "Shenzhou. yes..investing in india means investing in itself" But the other guy wrote: "they are investing in Telangana State with other company don't make people fool" so which other company are they investing in, if not Foxconn themselves? Yet the other guy claims that I'm making a fool of other people?
    8
  4016. Meanwhile, the USA absolves Saudi Arabian crown prince of blame for how the monarchy treats dissenters.
    8
  4017.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Do they live in a mansion and have all the lawyers like Meng does?" What has living in a mansion even got to do with this? Obviously, Meng and the 2 Michaels come from different income groups, how does their residence even factor into this?
    8
  4018. Many people have never set foot in China before, so the government's loosening of visa restrictions is attractive to them. Many visitors have decided to take advantage of the 15 days visa-free travel to finally visit China for the first time. And they are of course SHOCKED at how different China is compared to how China is portrayed in the west.
    8
  4019. ZAZMOTOR The government has made it clear that our political ideology is not for export. China isn't interested in spreading ideology, like communism like former Soviet Union, or USA with democracy. In fact, it's the USA that is invading Middle East countries like Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, etc, and cutting off the country's heads (like Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein) and then installing their own US puppets in place. Now President Trump is targeting Syria, and the Assad Regime is next on the list.
    8
  4020. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my You said: "if you do NOT believe me, then have China make cars as good as the Japanese cars then. Why can't China do it?" Well, have Japan launched their own space station into orbit without partnering with other countries, like China has? Why can't Japan do it?
    8
  4021. Good point. Printing dollars without spending them is not going to boost the economy, but it does make the value of each dollar less with each print.
    8
  4022.  @Andy-P  You said: "The leadership has the same intellectual capability." I think you're referring to the Western leadership. It's basically Russian and Chinese leadership that's brokering peace deals in the Middle East, while the Western leadership has regressed.
    8
  4023. Colonialism is oft believed to be a thing of the past, after many Asian and African countries freed themselves from formal colonial rule. Physically, the colonizers may have left. But mentally, many local people's minds remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. Coloniality refers to the set of attitudes, values, ways of knowing, and power structures upheld as normative by western colonizing societies, serving to rationalize and perpetuate western dominance even in today’s world. The end of colonial administrations in the modern world was not the end of coloniality.
    8
  4024.  @christopherhamlin6139  China already hosts the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion. With such a huge student population, competition for top schools and higher education is extremely fierce and intense in China. Many students who are unable to qualify for local universities so their parents send them overseas to study in Western universities. That's why Western universities are positively *flooded with international students studying the same topics as their Western peers.
    8
  4025. Studies have shown East Asians to be among the world's most diligent and intelligent peoples with long histories and rich cultures. Why can't East Asians put aside our minor differences and instead notice the many similarities that we share as East Asians?
    8
  4026. To think that Ukraine was once the center of world attention, right up till Oct 7. Now Ukraine has been largely abandoned in the media, and Palestine-Israel is now the center of world attention.
    8
  4027. China has made 5-year, 10-year, 20-year, 30-year plans to map out China's direction in the future, and by abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long-term to see these plans bloom and come to fruition. This is the advantage of China's system. In contrast, U.S Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of term limits, so they can only make short-term plans for the future of the U.S, instead of long-term plans, spanning say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of the U.S system.
    8
  4028.  @norvikgrigorian4518  "神州 Shenzhou why are you questioning me?" Can't I question you? You can question Cyrus, yet I can't I do the same to you? What's wrong with giving credit to countries where credit is due? Like what has the country Cyrus is from has to do with giving credit to another country?
    8
  4029. Kazakhstan is strategically located between Russia and China, as well as being a participant in China's Belt and Road Initiative, so no wonder it was a prime target for the USA.
    8
  4030.  @MarkYeung1  China is an atheist state under the CPC, so can't the government be above religion? It's understandable that in Muslim countries, Islam is above all. Just like in Christian countries, Christianity is above all. But since China is an atheist state, then even though other religions are permitted in China, the fact remains that the government is above and the religion can never be allowed to supersede the government in China.
    8
  4031. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 Previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held in Hong Kong by it's people. It's only during the period of Hong Kong's 1997 handover that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy where they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    8
  4032.  @MarkYeung1  Hong Kong was given the liberty to protest, but they overextended their rights. Remember that the Hong Kong extradition bill was proposed because of a certain incident. A Hong Kong guy named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, and stuff her body in her suitcase, before flying back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice for his crime, but Hong Kong has no extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. Source: The Murder Case That Lit the Fuse in Hong Kong nytimes.com/2019/06/15/world/asia/hong-kong-murder-taiwan-extradition.html That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to Hong Kong extradition laws. Do the HK protestors even know what they are protesting for? Have they read the bill and understood its contents in their entirety?
    8
  4033. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of all the territory Taiwan claims (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    8
  4034. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 Over 50 years ago, nobody expected China to succeed under the communist party, yet fast forward to today and China has since transformed from a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    8
  4035.  @johanhirte9661  What makes you think mainland China has 0 influence on Taiwan? Mainland China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    8
  4036. Son’s idea = Chinese democracy = Meritocracy (Competent people get promoted Father’s idea = American liberal democracy = the inverse of Meritocracy (Incompetent people get promoted)
    8
  4037. China is also the world's largest gaming market so games are also being customised to suit Chinese gamer's tastes.
    8
  4038. Yes. Previously before the 1997 return, the people of Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and there were no elections held by the people while Hong Kong was a British colony. It's only during the period of Hong Kong's return to mainland China in 1997 that the Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders under the One Country, Two Systems policy.
    8
  4039.  @UncleSF888  You said: "Chinese Communist Party has been using other low income countries to “test” their low efficacy vaccines" That's because China has the Covid-19 situation largely under countrol in China, but in order to test vaccine efficacy, you'll need a region with high Covid-19 infections to conduct the test and measure the results. I mean, how else to determine a vaccine's efficacy rate unless you test in a region with high Covid-19 infections? And China is not the only one who does this, even Western vaccines are testing their vaccines in developing countries.
    8
  4040.  @UncleSF888  You said: "...until they switch to the high efficacy vaccines from the West!" Most Western countries are buying and hoarding the Western Covid-19 vaccines themselves, leaving little to none for the developing countries, so how do those poorer countries just "switch" to Western vaccines just like that? In fact, China is the one providing many developing countries with Covid-19 vaccines, yet you accuse the Communist Party of China of being "pure evil" while the developed countries are buying up and hoarding the Western vaccines for themselves?
    8
  4041.  @DontUputThatEvilOnMe  I am Chinese yes, but why am I a nationalist bot? Because I post positive achievements about China? It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. If China can surpass the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this eventual goal of ours? Without being labelled as nationalist bots?
    8
  4042.  @EstanislaoSantino-xk8uz  "And y'all pretending that they wrong doing doesn't exist." Isn't he using YouTube precisely to voice out their wrong doings?
    8
  4043.  @honoraryamerica5943  The United States is the world's most protectionist country having implemented with nearly 9,500 protectionist policies in the period from 2009 to September 2023.
    8
  4044.  @richard35791  About the South China Sea, in 1958, the Vietnamese PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese, in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958._
    8
  4045.  @richard35791  With the Philippines independence in 1946, it should be noted that the Spratlys was not Philippine territory, as per the Treaty of Paris (1898). The Philippine Treaty Limits and Territorial Water Claim does not include the Spratly islands as Philippine territory.
    8
  4046.  @richard35791  You mentioned Vietnam not happy with China about Parcel Island, but the 1958 diplomatic note from Vietnam PM Pham Van Dong to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai had acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. But once rich oil and gas reserves were discovered in the South China Sea, Vietnam changed their mind and started claiming Paracel and Spratly as part of their territory.
    8
  4047. @Xi The Poo China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    8
  4048.  @MarkYeung1  Hong Kong riots were over in mid-2020. The National Security Law put an end to the riots and finally brought peace to Hong Kong. Importantly, the law also works to prevent such large, long-lasting riots from reoccurring again in the future. You said: "How is the Hong Kong stock market doing between June 2020 and February 2024" According to Nikkei Asia: Hong Kong stocks roar into 2021 on surge of investment from China _ One of the world's biggest laggards in major global stock indexes in 2020 is the best performer so far this year, thanks to a deluge of Chinese money. Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index on Monday closed above 30,000 points for the first time in 20 months as a rally since late December powered by investors in mainland China gains momentum._
    8
  4049.  @MarkYeung1  "Now, with Hong Kong being so stable, because of the National Security laws, the Hang Sang index is at 16,215" 2024 is 4 years after the National Security Law was implemented in mid-2020, so why are you claiming Hong Kong stock market falling is due to the National Security Law? That was 4 years ago.
    8
  4050.  @cchannel7857  Cyrus said in his email that he's been very busy lately and that's why he had a late response to CGTN's proposal. So it's possible that he was too busy at that time to work out payment details and that's why the payment discussion was delayed. It's not uncommon for payment details to be worked out later after the business transaction occurred, so what are you trying to say?
    8
  4051.  @John2r1  There is no "Taiwanese Language", if you Google it, it returns Mandarin Chinese (which is the same as the official language of mainland China). The people of Taiwan also make use of Chinese characters as their written script. Religiously, mainland China is a melting pot as well, and the five major religions practiced in China are Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism, and Protestantism. There are approximately 5,500 religious groups in China, including seven national organizations which are Buddhist Association of China, Chinese Taoist Association, China Islamic Association, Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association, Bishops' Conference of Catholic Church in China, National Committee of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement of the Protestant Churches in China, and China Christian Council.
    8
  4052. Abe adhered to the Western solution to inflation which is to print more money. Abe-nomics in a nutshell.
    8
  4053. The funny thing is that outwardly, USA expressed support for Japan releasing irradiated Fukushima waters. But inwardly, USA has maintained a ban on imports of farming and seafood products from the region near Fukushima. Yet JaYoe Nation thinks Chinese are just being racist against Japanese?
    8
  4054. There are so many other virus like Bird Flu, Swine Flu, H1N1, MERS, and other virus outbreaks that still occur regardless of wet markets, so does China need to close our wet markets? Many other countries in Asia, Africa and South America also have wet markets of their own.
    8
  4055.  @Steve-rv5mk  Yes. I've lost count of the number of times people simply hurled insults against me for my views, just because my views differ from theirs.
    8
  4056.  @rolyrodriguez1000  Yet, Putin enjoys high approval among Russians. In April 2023, over 80 percent of Russians approved of Putin, so if those sanctions were meant to turn Russians against their leader, they have failed to achieve this objective.
    8
  4057. More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy taken off Weibo helps puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    8
  4058.  @slovackoinfo  "Tell me what China produced and sold to the world 30 years ago." Chinese workers made products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, which was sold in the West at affordable prices. Think about the millions of dollars Americans (and others) have saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent elsewhere like on cars, housing and luxury goods. Isn't that why many Americans often flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money?
    8
  4059. 我很惊讶，虽然你离开中国多年，你仍然能保持这么好的普通话流利水平，太厉害了！
    8
  4060.  @MarkYeung1  Mainland China still holds the largest number of Hong Kong expatriates, more than countries in the West. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Hong Kongers)
    8
  4061. If you claim that people tend to blame their surroundings as opposed to themselves, their personality or being lazy, then why are you doing that exactly while in China? If Chinese people blame our surroundings, instead of ourselves for being lazy, then China would have remained dirt poor, undeveloped and starving, instead of becoming world's 2nd largest economy today. We worked to get where we are today, not by blaming the circumstances of our country. As for US social programs, there are many jobless people in USA, who make a living by sponging off government welfare packages and collecting food stamps, instead of actually finding a job and contributing back to society, while the hardworking people pay taxes to support such a system and propagate the cycle. So why do you think China wants to adopt such social programs, when all it seems to do is encourage lazyness among people? Our current social programs aren't perfect, or as good as the West, but we don't want to just blindly follow Western welfare programs, and fall into the same "traps" USA did. China should study thoroughly the advantages and disadvantages of such systems, and work towards finding a balanced program of our own instead. This is just my opinion that's all.
    8
  4062.  @AyupChuck  "How many social points did you earn for this comment? " The so-called "Social Credit" system in China has been shown to be a myth that's all. Closest equivalent in China would be a credit rating system for finances (much like credit card system in the West), but not a system for social behavior.
    8
  4063.  @TheMargaretgallagher  China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    8
  4064.  @Esquera123  "SMI is No 5 not 3. Stop lying and boasting." Read the CNBC article titled: China’s largest chipmaker SMIC is now the No. 3 foundry in the world, Counterpoint says (dated to May 23 2024). China’s largest chipmaker SMIC is now the world’s third-largest foundry in terms of revenue in the first quarter, according to Counterpoint Research. This places SMIC behind only Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and South Korea’s Samsung Foundry. Chips made by SMIC are found in automobiles, smartphones, computers, IoT technologies and more.
    8
  4065.  @Esquera123  From your numerous posts, it appears as though you just can't stand to see China succeed that's all. Even when shown CNBC article of SMIC being world's 3rd largest foundry, you claim it's dream, when it's you who refuse to face reality. You even express disgust at the success of Huawei, which just goes to show that you're against China succeeding that's all.
    8
  4066.  @Esquera123  Taiwan island inalienable part of China. Even Taiwan's own constitution states that Taiwan is a part of China. In the 1972 Shanghai Communique, the US acknowledges that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position.
    8
  4067. I thought uploader's video was poorly researched, but this guy even worst.
    8
  4068. China is also wooing the Pacific Island nations of Marshall Islands, Nauru, Palau, and Tuvalu in hopes of them switching their recognition of Taipei to Beijing. Much like how the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua switched their recognition to Beijing.
    8
  4069. Hypocrites indeed. The United States had accused mainland China of potentially abusing the Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now scrapped) yet the USA turn around and abuse their own extradition treaty with Canada through the arrest of Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou. The sheer irony and hypocrisy of the USA, accusing China of potentially doing something that the USA itself is doing.
    8
  4070.  @night6724  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    8
  4071. The Internet is huge, not just YouTube alone.
    8
  4072. Here's a Chinese analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family, which in turn would lead them right up to her ex-husband's doorstep. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    8
  4073. Have you asked yourself which of the two countries is the US sending billions of dollars of aid to?
    8
  4074.  @everythingandmore5537  Mandarin Chinese is the national language of China, why can't China teach Chinese citizens our national language?
    8
  4075.  @Paul-H-Wolfram6608  Many Filipinos (but not all) tend to have the Colonial Mentality, and continue to worship white culture while harboring disdain for any non-white culture (including their own).
    8
  4076.  @dinesh50448  Why should mainland China changed our name to Taiwan? Why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? Then why should mainland China change our name to Taiwan, when they are the ones who fled the mainland? The winner of a war needs to change their name to the loser's?
    8
  4077.  @pingguerrero2007  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    8
  4078.  @MarkYeung1  China stopped importing coal from Australia in 2020, but it's only 1 year later in 2021 that there were blackouts in Chinese cities. So the blackout was not caused lack of Australian coal imports.
    8
  4079.  @MarkYeung1  If the "reserves were consumed" then why was power eventually restored to the Chinese cities just after a few weeks? Mind you, China only resumed buying Australian coal in 2023 (2 years after the blackouts in 2021) so it's apparent that the blackouts were not connected to the ban on Australian coal.
    8
  4080.  @zackk4969  Korea was once a single unified country, until the Japanese invaded and occupied Korea. After Japanese surrender, Korea was (needlessly) divided into North Korea (USSR) and South Korea (USA). North Korea wanted to end the humiliating division of their country and they almost succeeded (90% unified) until the USA intervened in internal civil war inside Korea and pushed back the North Korean forces past the 38th line of division and into actual North Korean territory, right up to China's doorstep. In the end, China joined in the Korean War to protect the border with North Korea.
    8
  4081. The logo is also reminisce of a skater at the top and a skier at the bottom.
    8
  4082.  @AutoAllan  Both are important yes, but if I'd had to pick one, I'll choose saving lives as a priority over saving businesses like you did. But the OP just seemingly started calling me a beggar out of nowhere, just for appearing on this thread.
    8
  4083.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "because Putin knew they wouldn't change the election results." And you think Grigory Yavlinsky and Alexei Navalny would have changed the election results? In 2018, Yavlinsky ran against Putin and only got 1.05% of the vote. As for Alexei Navlany, in 2023 according to a poll by the Levada Center, only 9% of respondents said they held a positive view of Alexei Navalny, 57% disapproved of his activities, and 23% had never heard of him. How's that considered major opponents?
    8
  4084.  @Falsificationpondering  You said: "either accept their conditions or face severe economic consequences." Sounds like Bhutanese sovereignty isn't real after all, when their southern neighbor can heavily influence Bhutan's foreign policy so much against their northern neighbor. Won't the solution then be to expand Bhutan's economic links with China in order to be less dependent on India? China has so much to offer Bhutan, yet it appears Bhutan is reluctant to expand relations with the rising Asian power, much less lead in the rise of Asia.
    8
  4085.  @ashokjain8449  You said l: "Most importantly I'm particularly concerned with their irresponsible behaviour in letting the virus take others completely unawares. That's why I call them in a sense enemy mankind presently." China had notified the World Health Organization of a mysterious new coronavirus outbreak on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. Who says China let the virus take others completely unawares? We shared the information with WHO as soon as we known about it ourselves. Even if you ignored China informing WHO, the government rushed to built a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised. Video: Huoshenshan: the hospital built in 10 days in China over coronavirus outbreak youtu.be/l2QfufpwfdY China also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. Video: Time-lapse video shows how Leishenshan hospital completed in 12 days youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk So unless other countries leaders are blind, they can clearly see China's message that "This coronavirus is serious!" but Western countries just blame China for not informing them, when we clearly did.
    8
  4086.  @tjena5772  Anti-China people like to pretend to love China, using the same old excuse of "I'm not anti-China, I'm just anti-CPC" to defend themselves and justify their anti-China stance. I already shown that the Permanent Court of Arbitration is not an official UN agency, like the International Court of Justice, but you still pretend that the PCA has the same judiciary powers as the ICJ, which is clearly untrue.
    8
  4087.  @tjena5772  About the border clash, even Indian PM Narendra Modi publicly stated that Chinese troops did not enter Indian territory and no posts were taken. Source: ‘China did not enter our territory, no posts taken’: PM at all-party meet on Ladakh clash hindustantimes.com/india-news/chinese-troops-did-not-enter-our-territory-says-pm-modi-at-all-party-meeting-on-ladakh-standoff/story-QGgGUyL3sVRYB7mp3Y8bBI.html
    8
  4088. Another point is that the port still requires human personnel to perform repairs and maintenance of those machines.
    8
  4089.  FREEHONGKONG-yn5ij  Have you seen the videos of the homeless in California?
    8
  4090. 1. Abe’s maternal grandfather was a Class-A war criminal. 2. Abe insisted in going to Yasakuni Shrine that interned the ashes of all of these class A war criminals even when the Japanese Emperor Hirohito refused to. 3. Abe pushed for the amendment of Article 9 of the Japanese constitution, regarding its pacifist clause. 4. Abe came up with the idea of the Quad. 5. Abenomics has failed and that is why Japan’s debt is 230% of GDP and the yen is in a free fall since March.
    8
  4091.  @bhl3840  My foreign friends told me that if they want the convenience of WeChat mobile payments, they need to set up a Chinese bank account first and link WeChat wallet to that account. Otherwise, no foreigner can use WeChat without a Chinese bank account. But with the digital Renminbi, it's just a digitalised version of Chinese Yuan, and can be accepted by WeChat wallet for mobile payments, so foreigners can use it without the need the prior to set up a Chinese bank account. Video: Why is China moving to digital RMB? youtu.be/sulhpJ1rOWs
    8
  4092. Ultimately, it's up to Chinese people ourselves to improve China further. Cyrus Janssen is an American, so it's better for him to focus on improving his own country, which if you think about, is oftentimes the main topic of his videos, that of how the U.S can improve further relations with China.
    8
  4093.  @michaelkatz275  The CPC's interests are the people's interests. Take poverty alleviation for example, according to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty. China's poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015, as measured by the percentage of people living on the equivalent of US$1.90 or less per day in 2011 purchasing price parity terms (which still stands in 2022).
    8
  4094. Not many cities have the suitable climate to host both the Summer Olympics and the Winter Olympics. That's why Beijing has made history as being the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both types of Olympics, in 2008 and in 2022.
    8
  4095.  @markbenjamin1703  The Tibet Autonomous Region is literally the roof of the world, located on the Himalayan mountain range, and the high attitudes create low-oxygen environments that could potentially complicate Winter athletes breathing and hamper their training, so is it really a good idea for China to host the Olympics in TAR?
    8
  4096. Many Chinese are optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    8
  4097. China believes in win-win cooperation while the U.S is all about a zero sum game.
    8
  4098.  @zackk4969  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"? Video: Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' youtu.be/DPt-zXn05ac
    8
  4099.  @chungusultimate  The helicopter footage showed indiscriminate fire targeting both friend and foe alike. Israelite soldiers have also received orders from the higher ups to shoot at everything. Also, where's the footage of hamas shooting civilians? Their goal is to take hostages to exchange for the release of Palestinian hostages so why would they kill them?
    8
  4100. Researchers from China and the U.S. have also jointly developed the world's first functional semiconductor made from graphene with an electron mobility 10 times greater than silicon.
    8
  4101.  @thequantumalchemist2965  I take it that you had initially wrote a long post, only for YT to shadow-ban it. So you've decided to break up your post into multiple smaller replies, in order to bypass the shadow-ban, and it appears to have been successful?
    8
  4102. +Aart Bruneel If USA joins in this war scenario, then will it side with Russia or China against the other? Or will it cause both Russia and China side together against USA? It is clear that by opting to stay out of this fight, USA stands to gains the most when Russia and China fight each other. USA gains nothing by joining this fight, even for the sake of Mongolia.
    8
  4103. @Karen Xitler Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of the Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? Yet Mao is being recorded as a mass murderer when those people starved to death unintentionally.
    8
  4104.  @stopwarstop7334  Just because the missile point at Taiwan doesn't mean that the mainland will attack Taiwan. For example, there are US warships sailing in the Taiwan Strait on the mainland/Taiwan border, so our missiles serve as a warning to US vessels attempting to separate Taiwan from the mainland. If you don't want the mainland missiles too point at the Taiwan Straits, then you should tell the USA to stop sailing warships through that region.
    8
  4105.  @viper2148  The greatest death and destruction of history was caused by Anglo-Saxons, such as the two World Wars and the genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, occupation of their lands even till today. In just a couple of centuries, Western colonialism has irrevocably changed population demographics of entire continents, yet you're claiming the Communist Party of China is the worst?
    8
  4106.  @viper2148  You said: "because of innovations by "ANGLO-SAXONS" such as vaccinations" Vaccines were invented by Chinese. Prior to the introduction of vaccination with material from cases of cowpox (heterotypic immunisation), smallpox could be prevented by deliberate variolation with smallpox virus. The earliest hints of the practice of variolation for smallpox in China come during the 10th century. The Chinese also practiced the oldest documented use of variolation, dating back to the fifteenth century. They implemented a method of "nasal insufflation" administered by blowing powdered smallpox material, usually scabs, up the nostrils. Various insufflation techniques have been recorded throughout the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries within China. Two reports on the Chinese practice of inoculation were received by the Royal Society in London in 1700; one by Martin Lister who received a report by an employee of the East India Company stationed in China and another by Clopton Havers. Source: Vaccine wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine#History
    8
  4107. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiments in the West. Since the 19th century, many have grown so accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually overtaking the United States someday in the foreseeable future is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    8
  4108.  @bigchef3394  Why do you despise the Chinese government? Over 50 years ago, literally nobody thought that China would succeed, become powerful or play an important role in global politics, yet fast forward till today and look at how far China has come under the leadership of the communist party. Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made-in-China) having world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd largest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-China propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    8
  4109.  @chrishannis1  If you claim Taiwan is independent then where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? If not, then since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    8
  4110. It's a combination of the "Red Scare" (fear of communism) and the "Yellow Peril" (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, Westerners have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-liberal democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many Westerners to fathom.
    8
  4111.  Naikomi  What's wrong with China using the same poverty definition that's used by many African nations? China is still a developing country, not a developed country, so of course China is going to use the definition of poverty that's being used by countries like Germany. The point is that the cost of living in China is (generally) far lower than living in Germany. Food, rent, clothing, transport, is much lower, so many Chinese people save money on living expenses that ordinary German need to spend over the years
    8
  4112.  Naikomi  Even if you don't buy a car in China, you can still opt to take the Chinese subway and the train fare is cheaper than the train fare in Germany. Commuting to and back from work is cheap and safe, here's a video of taking the Beijing subway. Video: Taking The Beijing Subway youtu.be/25ozzA9aOko
    8
  4113.  @deankruse2891  Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that the cost of living in America is kept to a minimum. Think about the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursuits like cars, housing, luxury brands, school fees, tuition fees and so on.
    8
  4114.  @sarahbrown5073  If Chinese government could control everything, then how did they let the 30% accuracy testing kits go? It was later shown that Spain purchased those testing kits from unapproved Chinese companies, so why Spain choose to buy from unapproved companies?
    8
  4115.  @Andy-P  Excuse me but censorship also exists even on a Western platform like YouTube.
    8
  4116. Like China, India actually contributed much to greening the Earth by reforestation. Source: India plants 220 million trees in a single day cbsnews.com/news/climate-change-india-plants-220-million-trees-in-a-single-day-to-save-the-planet/
    8
  4117.  @MarkYeung1  When China joined the WTO, it agreed to considerably harsher conditions than other developing countries. Accession meant that China would engage in global competition according to rules that it did not make.
    8
  4118.  @deschan2246  What makes you think US consumers will be fine with products from other countries? Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, clothing, toys, sneakers, etc, cheap so that inflation in America is kept to a minimum and the cost of living is lower than it should be. Think of the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursuits, like cars, housing, luxury brands, or on essentials like school fees, tuition fees, doctor's fees, hospital bills, etc.
    8
  4119. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US's and it's "allies").
    8
  4120. "Whoever is first in the field and awaits the coming of the enemy, will be fresh for the fight; whoever is second in the field and has to hasten to battle will arrive exhausted." - Sun Zi's The Art of War 《孙子兵法》
    8
  4121. Trump: No rare earth? Never mind, America shall use common earth instead, since it's less rare.
    8
  4122.  @wolfgangdevries127  U.S can't even fix their financial situation.
    8
  4123. Huawei CFO Meng was arrested by Canadian authorities but which Canadian law did Meng allegedly broke while on Canadian soil? No evidence was ever released regarding the reason for Meng's arrest.
    8
  4124.  @wuhuhu1390  The funny thing is that in the West, it's called Mandarin 官话 because it was the language spoken by the Imperial Court, the mandarins 官. But today in China, it's known as the common language putonghua 普通话, so rather than the imperial court language.
    8
  4125.  @man-kitli1572  You said: "It is senseless for you, a stooge working shamelessly for a totalitarian regime, to draw absurd analogies between the relationship of a couple & the invasion of a country that is claiming the lives of innocent people." How are my analogies absurd? I've explained the Russo-Ukraine in a more relatable format, that even ordinary people can understand and relate to. And what makes you assume that I'm a stooge working for a totalitarian regime? You don't tolerate others with an opinion different from yours?
    8
  4126.  @MarkYeung1  "141 nations voted against Russia in UN, with only 5 support" Those that abstained or voted in support of Russia include China, India, Pakistan, etc and our combined population already represents around 50% the world's population. Most of the African countries and Latin American countries either abstained or voted in support of Russia, because they know about the the U.S attempt to maintain hegemonic control.
    8
  4127.  @williambreedyk7861  If NATO is a defensive pact then why did NATO bombed Yugoslavia in 1999? Yugoslavia did not attack any member of NATO.
    8
  4128.  @ryannverano6452  Taiwan is part of China, look at Taiwan's constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. And which Philippines fishermen been shot by Chinese coastguard? None! You're just slandering China without proof that's all. The Philippines coastguard shoot to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman Hong Shicheng (洪石成) but you refused to address his death that's all.
    8
  4129.  @ryannverano6452  China first claimed South China Sea Islands when Republic of China 🇹🇼 published the 11 Dash Line (which the 9 Dash Line by People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 is based on) and nobody objected against China's claims, not Vietnam, not Philippines, not America. The Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence in 1946 that the Spratlys was not Philippine territory, both to not anger Chiang Kai-shek in China and because the Spratlys were not part of the Philippines per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America.
    8
  4130.  @sammexp  Hong Kong actually held more elections after the 1997 handover back to mainland China, than it ever did for 150 years as British colony.
    8
  4131. I really enjoy Brian's coverage of NED funding color revolutions across the world. Even the recent Solomon Islands Chinatown riots, over their government switching recognition of Taipei to Beijing, I'm willing to bet the NED is behind it as well. I think the locals care more about putting food on the table, than the loss of recognition of Taiwan.
    8
  4132.  @MarkYeung1  Mainland China remains committed to peaceful reunification on the Taiwan strait. The Chinese fighter jets was in response to the US House of Speaker representative visiting Taiwan island even though the US acknowledges the One China policy that the island is part of China. Had the US representative not made the visit to Taiwan, then the mainland would not be forced to take such actions to defend our sovereignty. Russia had amassed a big force outside Ukraine before Feb 2022, but today, there is not massing of People's Liberation Army forces in the Taiwan strait.
    8
  4133.  @MarkYeung1  "Does Beijing want Taiwanese to elect the KMT or DPP?" How does what Beijing want factor into the elections in Taiwan? Ideally, Beijing wouldn't mind a government in Taiwan that's willing to improve cross strait relations as well as being against independence. That's all there is to it. If KMT is willing to work towards peaceful reunification than hopefully the people of Taiwan realise that that's in the island's interests.
    8
  4134.  @beastmode8203  Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out is due to (perceived) support from the U.S. But it's no secret that the U.S is in decline and China is rising. As long as peace prevails, the U.S will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge the mainland's rise, by which Taiwan's backing would evaporate and reunification becomes inevitable.
    8
  4135.  @nmpolo  The difference is that while Hawaii wasn't part of the United States historically, in China's case, the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically part of China. Distance is not a factor considered in issues of territorial sovereignty.
    8
  4136.  @Something-tz2vw  "I lived IN Taiwan, China, Korea and now Philippines for many years. My point? No need to give me history lessons mate." Yet you didn't know that Taiwan claims an even larger area of the South China Sea than mainland China (Taiwan's 11 Dash Line versus mainland China's 9 Dash Line). It's apparent that you lack historical understanding of the South China Sea issue, despite claiming to have lived in those regions you mentioned. Also, Philippines taking advantage of a typhoon in Thitu Island to swoop in and claim the island for their own is not the only historical example of Philippines being sneaky. The Philippines also intentionally grounded a vessel (named Sierra Madre) onto the Second Thomas Shoal in order to stake their claim onto the shoal. In 1999, president Joseph Estrada promised that the vessel would be towed away. In 2014, the Chinese government asked the Philippines to remove the grounded ship. In 2017, China and the Philippines established a gentlemen's agreement that the status quo would be maintained for the South China Sea while both sides tried to strengthen their relations. Under the status quo agreement, no construction materials would be allowed to fortify the Sierra Madre. But recently Philippines has violated this agreement by sending supply ships with construction materials to reinforce the hull of the rusting vessel. And the Philippine resupply missions are still ongoing in spite of the 2017 agreement they had with China.
    8
  4137.  @bungkusi2432  Agreed. Many older generation parents aren't as "Internet savvy" as the younger generation so if parental control is insufficient, then the government may need to step in to curb addiction. And yes, some video games have the option for kids to spend money on in-game purchases. There was one instance where a child stole ¥2,000 from his grandmother's wallet to equipment for a mobile game.
    8
  4138.  @supermantom2456  fentanyl was created in 1959 by Dr. Paul Janssen, that's where it's from.
    8
  4139. Such rational and thoughtful views such as Cyrus' is sadly in short supply in much of Western media.
    8
  4140. How do you feel about the capitalist system in America? In China the Chinese government controls the state-owned enterprises for China's benefit, reining in companies when they strayed too far. However, in the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of the ordinary Americans.
    8
  4141. The world followed China with paper money. Eventually they will do so with digital currency as well.
    8
  4142.  @indexfinisher  Singapore actually joined the West in sanctioning Russia in 2022 (in fact being the only ASEAN country to have done so). Russia's response was to include Singapore on a list of "unfriendly countries" so is that really a wise course of action for Singapore to take sides?
    8
  4143. They can't be bothered to distinguish them. That's why most of the casualties reported in Gaza turned out to be women and children.
    8
  4144.  @stopwarstop7334  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    8
  4145. The white guy seemed a bit biased but I think I can understand how he feels.
    7
  4146. +skilthedesert Every country have their form of freedom. Is it freedom when you can own guns and start shooting people because of freedom? No. There are laws in place, so its simply that China's laws are stricter than most countries. Flag burning/desecration is also illegal in Austria, Finland, France, Germany, India, Ireland, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland etc.
    7
  4147. Politics should be about doing what's right, not what's popular...
    7
  4148. 我觉得中国政府会对待外国人比自己的人好。
    7
  4149. Yes, now everyone is going to think that Chinese people talk about amputating feet all the time. They are just doing it for the shock value and not for educational purposes or to get people interested in learning Chinese. This video is quite the disservice in representing the Chinese language.
    7
  4150. +Shanghai Noon I agree, China may have once been democratic under Sun Yat Sen and Jiang Jieshi, but there were still various warlords and infighting and Mao managed to accomplished unification of China. A unified country is strong, a divided country is weak and fights among itself.
    7
  4151.  @elanor2123  I thought the reference of the village bully (U.S) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) as well as Ukraine wanting to marry into this family was rather apt, since USA literally dictates NATO. Also, what horrible things Russia did to Ukraine? Ukraine was at it's most prosperous during the Soviet Union, but after the USSR fell, Ukraine was arguably the poorest country in Europe.
    7
  4152.  @MarkYeung1  China is hosting foreign ministers from Arab and Muslim nations for talks on ending the war in Gaza. Meanwhile the US continues to support Israel militarily. So China is working towards political solution while the US is supporting military solution.
    7
  4153.  @zeckundead  If you want to talk about concentration camps, then it's actually the United States that has the world's largest prison population.
    7
  4154.  @nightmark2120  The Americans killed many Filipinos during the American-Philippine war, yet some Filipinos still think USA is their ally.
    7
  4155.  @yslee1401  Tibetan plenipotentiaries signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet, (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. The 14th Dalai Lama even ratified the agreement in the form of a telegraph on 24 October 1951. But even before that, Tibet was historically part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongolians conquered the Kingdom of Thibet and also Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. Manchurian conquerors did the same thing centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Tibet briefly broke free of China in 1912, but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951. Today, countries all over the world acknowledge that Tibet is part of the People's Republic of China.
    7
  4156.  @ashpatel2505  "Who poisoned your mind to believe that a communist country with the established record of human suppression is a lovable country..." What makes you think Chinese people are suppressed? With China's reopening, Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your countries and spending coin on your tourism industries. Your schools and universities have many Chinese international students studying the same topics as their peers, yet you think Chinese are suppressed? If anything, it sounds as though your mind is poisoned to think negatively about our country that's all.
    7
  4157. Since 1980s, Chinese workers helped to build infrastructure in African countries (Nigeria, Angola, Kenya, Ethiopia, etc.) like roads, railways, highways, schools, hospitals, hotels, shopping centers, football stadiums and telecommunication projects. China has done much in Africa in decades compared to what Westerners did in Africa for centuries.
    7
  4158.  @treblan1  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    7
  4159.  @knowledgeispower3212  Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have revolutionized their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge much more efficient. The Compass made navigation easier for travelers unable to navigate when the Sun and stars are hidden behind the clouds. And Gunpowder has changed the ways modern wars are fought.
    7
  4160.  @goinbulilit3846  Except that Hong Kong was part of China till Great Britain took it and made it into a colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    7
  4161.  @andrenogueira5058  Mainland China literally has more billionaires than Taiwan Island. Here's a list of countries/states by their number of billionaires according to Forbes (March 2022) 1. United States (735) 2. Mainland China (539) 3. India (166) 4. Germany (134) 5. Russia (83) 6. Hong Kong, China (67) 7. Canada (64) 8. Brazil (62) 9. Italy (52) 10. Taiwan, China (51) ... Source: Forbes
    7
  4162.  @xSYNDICATEDx  You said: "Go study history pls. China is nondifferent fromnindia in that perspective" India is also an ancient civilization, but its political system has changed over the years and today it follows the Western-style liberal democracy. In fact, India often prides itself on being the "largest democracy" in the world, whereas China's political system today, although ostensibly different from before, retains the same feature of a strong central government and can be said to be a continuation of its earlier political system.
    7
  4163.  @vietnguyen4312  Because Taiwan has a much smaller population than mainland China. Look at India, it's the world's 2nd most populous country (and the world's largest democracy) yet China's GDP per capita is 10x that of India's, despite China not being a Western-style democracy. And even Taiwan's constitution says that Taiwan is part of China, so since there hasn't been any amendments to it's consitution, then Taiwan is part of China under their constitution.
    7
  4164. Many Chinese retain curiosity about the West, travel overseas to study and learn about other cultures. However, many Americans aren't interested in learning cultures outside of the USA, neither are many interested in travelling overseas.
    7
  4165.  @yxmichaelxyyxmichaelxy3074  You said: "The goods arrive. The exporter has to pay for it" At most, exporters pay when they export out of the country (i.e China). From then on, it's up to the freighter company where they want to send those goods to, and exporters don't have to pay for what happens to the cargo once they leave port. When the goods arrive, it's the importer that have to pay to import those goods, and ultimately, the cost is passed on to the consumers themselves.
    7
  4166.  @joebloe1401  Is that so? Cyrus' video promote the peaceful message of "building bridges, not walls" between U.S and China, so if you're claiming that the Chinese are promoting this message, well, isn't that a positive message for the world?
    7
  4167. Well said. Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule for over 100 years and it flourished as British colony. And Taiwan was under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life, and it flourished under KMT dictatorship. Singapore was (and still is) under authoritarian single-party PAP rule for its entire life as a nation, and it flourished under PAP rule. And South Korea had the South Korean dictator Park Chung Hee, who transformed S. Korea from dirt-poor country (with GDP lower than some Sub-Saharan African countries) into a modern country today. And if you want to include Japan as well, Japan's first industrialization occurred earlier, during the Meiji Restoration under the authoritarian rule of Japanese Emperor Meiji (named for the era) and he abolished the Samurai class (which represented a drain on Japan's economy) and dissatisfied Samurai fought a bloody civil war, with spears, bows and katanas against a rapidly modernizing Japanese army equipped with rifles and cannons. Yet this Fareed guy somehow linked democracy with economic success?
    7
  4168.  @edwardr8826  South Korea experienced massive economic growth under the South Korean dictator Park Chung Hee. When Park came to power in 1961, South Korea's per capita income was only US$72.00 (poorer than some Sub-Saharan African countries) and North Korea was the greater economic and military power on the peninsula. One of Park's main goals was to end the poverty of South Korea, and lift the country up from being a Third World economy to a First World economy via etatist methods. Park is credited with playing a pivotal role in the development of South Korea's tiger economy by shifting its focus to export-oriented industrialisation, resulting in rapid economic growth and industrialization in South Korea, and this was known as the Miracle on the Han River (한강의 기적) However, he became increasingly dictatorial later and declared martial law and amended the constitution into a highly authoritarian document called the Yushin Constitution (effectively abolishing the former constitution) and granting him dictatorial powers. Park is a controversial figure in modern South Korean political discourse and among the South Korean populace in general for his dictatorship and undemocratic ways. While some credit him for sustaining the Miracle on the Han River, which reshaped and modernized South Korea, others criticize his authoritarian way of ruling the country (especially after 1971) and for prioritizing economic growth and contrived social order at the expense of civil liberties.
    7
  4169.  @honesttruth8710  Misunderstanding? So the rest of the 5 Eyes countries (i.e Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand) also heard this "misunderstanding" by the U.S and they choose to diplomatically boycott the games?
    7
  4170.  @GMK189-f2k  Because it's a long-term study by reputable organisations like Harvard University and Ash Centre, that's why it's from 6 years ago. And if anything, China's handling of Covid-19 actually boosted citizens confidence in the government, according to a latest survey published by The Washington Post. Cary Wu, a sociology professor at York University in Canada, in collaboration with 17 Chinese academics, recruited more than 600 students from 53 universities. They conducted the survey in late April 2020 through one-on-one interviews online with 19,816 people from 31 provinces or provincial-level administrative regions across China. It found that Chinese citizens' trust in their national government reached 98 percent. Their trust in local government also hit 91 percent. Trust in government at the county level reached 93 percent, 94 percent at the city level and 95 percent at the provincial level. The survey also found that 49 percent of the respondents had become more trusting in their national government since the pandemic started, 48 percent said no change.
    7
  4171.  @michaeljames2349  "Russia is supposed to be the second most powerful military in the world and they can’t even take Ukraine." Do you have any idea how big Ukraine is? It is the second-largest European country after Russia, yet Russia has already incorporated the 4 oblasts of Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia. Not bad for the world's second most powerful military. Meanwhile, the world's most powerful military lost the Afghan War after nearly 20 years and pouring trillions of dollars in aid to Afghanistan. "Also don’t blame Ukraine for attacking Russian positions after being attacked." No, I'm blaming them for the indiscriminate targeting of Russian civilians in the border town of Belgorod.
    7
  4172.  @zenlei8258  That's exactly what I said, that Zelenskyy was elected because he promised to bring peace to Donbas region, but the Ukrainian neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion are threatening Zelenskyy if he signs the Minsk agreement. Why are you repeatedly accusing me of being naive?
    7
  4173. In the video, the Keriya Aitika Mosque is not destroyed, only the North Gate is demolished, but the South Gate and the prayer room is intact. The prayer room is a protected heritage site and even the footage shows that the Mosque is still alive.
    7
  4174.  @Ace-mw9pm  You said: "So you just gonna act like the U.S didn't save not only the Philippines but china too from Japan in WW2" The U.S did not save China from Japan in WW2. When Imperial Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931 (8 years before the Nazi invaded Poland start of WW2), the Americans were content to let the Japanese conquer more and more Chinese territory. Only when Pearl Harbor was bombed did the Americans finally joined China against the Japanese, so it was not for China's sake that U.S joined WWII. In total, China fought Japan for 14 years (1931-1945) with 11 years alone. Whereas the U.S fought Japan for 3 years (1942-1945) with Chinese aid.
    7
  4175.  @barrywhite1770  How is democracy more stable in the long run? China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US short term leadership.
    7
  4176. It's a combination of the "Red Scare" (fear of communism) and the "Yellow Peril" (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today.
    7
  4177.  @fredgillespie5855  In your first line, you're saying that Palestinians has to act according to the laws of war and not target civilians. But in your next line, you're justifying Israel's right to defend itself by targeting civilians? Why the double standards?
    7
  4178.  @Naikomi95  You said: "I earn double of what people with a similar job in China earn, working in germany" But the cost of living in China is (generally) lower than the cost of living in Germany. Food is cheap in China, gas and electricity is cheaper in China. In Germany, they used to have access to cheap Russian gas, but no longer after Nordstream was blown. Meanwhile China continues to import cheap Russian gas to fuel its economic growth.
    7
  4179.  @xpro2009  You said: "Your argument that people move from their country of origin because of colonial mentality is not founded on solid facts." That's YOUR argument, not mine. I never mentioned anything about migration, until you brought up "There are more Chinese in the US than Filipinos." My argument was that colonial mentality is holding back the people of Philippines, in that they continue to view themselves as inferior compared to their former colonial masters. You said: "There are many Chinese today in the Philippines... They could be there for empire expansion. The cpc empire expansion." The Chinese immigration to the Philippines began mostly between the 16th and 19th centuries back when Philippines was still a Spanish colony. The Communist Party of China wasn't even formed back then, so how can the Chinese in the Philippines be a ploy by the CPC to expand? The oriental power that colonized the Philippines was Imperial Japan during WWII, China as a nation never colonized the Philippines historically. But it seems that you're directing this fear from the Japanese in the past, to Chinese today in the present that's all.
    7
  4180. India is always welcome to come on board the Belt and Road Initiative to share in mutual progress and prosperity. Regardless, Beijing will still respect New Delhi's decision not to participate in OBOR.
    7
  4181. Capitalism rewards monopolies like Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon, dominating their respective industries and eliminating competition. China actually has an anti-monopoly law to clamp down on anti-competitive practices in the industry and Jack Ma of Alibaba is being investigated under anti-monopoly law.
    7
  4182.  @sy.l3435  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    7
  4183. The unipolar world is in decline, and the multipolar world is being born.
    7
  4184.  @jmac8092  Capitalism is killing the planet, it's the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."
    7
  4185. That only constitutes a small percentage of China's youth.
    7
  4186.  @Nesher92  Besides smartphones, Chinese companies also dominate the civilian drone industry and Chinese company DJI is world's largest civilian drone-maker according to the following source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 top10drone.com/top-drone-companies/ But where are the famous companies from Hong Kong or Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    7
  4187.  Jeffrey Tham  Actually, my username isn't really "Divine Vessel" that's 神舟 Shenzhou. My username is 神州 Shenzhou which translates to "The Divine Lands" and is actually one of the ancient names of China. Source: Wikipedia: Names of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_China#Shenzhou
    7
  4188.  @Nesher92  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: White Terror (Taiwan) wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Terror_(Taiwan) But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Source: Taiwan Miracle wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_Miracle Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Today, Taiwan's economy is in a slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising, and Taiwan graduates are unable to find jobs, so they seek employment opportunities abroad, such as in mainland China or places like Singapore.
    7
  4189.  @Nesher92  Hong Kong actually held more elections AFTER the 1997 handover back to mainland China, than they ever did for 150 years as a British colony, what are you even talking about? It's thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy, where they had none before as British colony.
    7
  4190.  @MarkYeung1  It's because of U.S military industrial complex (i.e Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, etc) that's funding so-called Australian think tanks such like ASPI (Australia Strategic Policy Institute) in order to spread fear and paranoia of China, so that countries start buying American weapons (like in the case of AUKUS).
    7
  4191. +To Li What do you want to talk about then? China has surpassed the USA in certain scientific fields such as supercomputers. China is home to world's fastest supercomputer and in a 2017 Top 500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the worlds fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source: cnet (dot) com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/
    7
  4192. Good leaders are extremely hard to come by, especially one that is willing to tackle the enormous task of cracking down on corruption within the government, so why would it mean DEATH simply because a good one is found?
    7
  4193.  @sansan2591  You can't refute my points so you accuse me of being a communist party bot? Why not attack my points instead of attacking me personally?
    7
  4194.  @elanor2123  "神州 Shenzhou Atheism is not a religion," Despite the fact that atheism is not a religion, atheism is protected by many of the same Constitutional rights that protect religion. Since Christian countries and Muslim countries can promote Christianity or Islam in their lands, then can't China as an atheist country (under the Communist Party) promote atheism in our lands? You said: "and promoting atheism equals to demoting every other religion in this world." Similarly promoting one religion is equal demoting every other religion isn't it? The Christians believe in a single God above, whereas there are millions of gods in Hindu mythology and they aren't the same. Even in some Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia, they promote Islam over Christianity, so much such that Christians in Saudi Arabia face discrimination. You asked: "In contrast, countries promoting religion do not (mostly) force people to believe in their religion, do they?" See Saudi Arabia's example above. You asked: "But in China, they force people to let go of all the beliefs which does not fit the ccp's standards, don't they?" The same could be said for every country's government. The Western countries like U.S, U.K, etc and Islamic countries Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Turkey, etc, would not allow beliefs that do not fit their respective government's standards isn't it? You said: "People should be free to believe what they want as long as it does not significantly harm others or violates other human rights, do you disagree?" I would agree if you include as long as it doesn't harm themselves too, like in the case of Tibetan self-immolation resulting in disfigurement, scarring from burns and loss of their own lives. That's akin to throwing away your life for the sake of religion in my opinion.
    7
  4195. ​ @elanor2123  "神州 Shenzhou You're list of hydroelectric power plants in China does not mean that the ccp has made every Tibetan's lives happy." Not every Tibetan of course, but I daresay the vast majority of Tibetan lives have improved thanks to clean energy generated by the list of hydroelectric powerstations in Tibet. Before there, Tibetans have been living without electricity, gas and running water. No power cables, phone lines, computers, house appliances, Internet connection, mobile phones, cars, and other modern technology. You said: "You're second reason of China providing &introducing new technologies to Tibetans, which improved the lives of Tibetans is like saying how Western countries improved the lives of natives in other countries..." Isn't it true that the Western countries improve the lives of natives in other countries through technology? I'm against Western Imperialism that's true, but I cannot deny that the use of technology improved their lives. You said: "or how Japan improved the lives of Koreans and Chinese by introducing new technologies," Could you list some examples of what technology did Japan introduced to Chinese?
    7
  4196.  @elanor2123  "But religion and beliefs is far from being free in China." Let's get this straight, you earlier admitted that you are an atheist yourself (your words were: "In fact, I'm an atheist too.") yet why is it China is wrong for promoting atheism? You yourself are an atheist, meaning that you don't believe in any god yourself, yet here you are arguing for the sake of how religion is treated in China? Can't you see the sheer irony in your arguments? An atheist like you arguing about religion in China? You said: "I don't think people in Xinjiang and Tibet are free to pursue a lot of their ancestor's religious beliefs." Have you actually been to Lhasa in Tibet Autonomous Region, China? Search online for videos of Lhasa, and you can find many religious Tibetans in prayer, spinning those prayer-wheels and prayer-tops, and performing full-body kowtows on the ground in worship. Then what makes you think people in Tibet aren't free to to pursue a lot of their ancestor's religious beliefs? Have you actually been to those places? "In my perspective, in normal Chinese cities, people don't go to concentration camps like the Uighurs for believing in a religion." Which normal Chinese cities have you been to? And what Uighurs concentration camps are you talking about? The Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (national language of China), Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American citizens by birth, they learn English at school, American history, and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America.
    7
  4197.  @elanor2123  Look, you've previously admitted that you yourself are atheist (you said: "In fact, I'm an atheist too.") which means that you don't believe in any god yourself, then why are you arguing against China (an atheist country) promoting atheism? The whole basis of your argument about religion, is already undermined by you being an atheist yourself, it's almost as if you're "virtue-signalling" yourself against China that's all. "Promoting a single religion is not demoting every other religion." We've already gone over how Christian and Muslim countries promote Christianity and Islam in their lands (respectively, and naturally this comes at the expense of other religion apart from the core religion of the country. In China's case, China is atheist under the Communist Party, then can't China promote atheism, as other religious countries do with their respective religions? "Can't people change what they believe, and freely go back and forth from believing atheism to religion in the Western world? But in China, that option is a bit grayed out, isn't it?" What makes you think people in China can't change what they believe, and freely go back and forth from believing atheism to religion? The number of Christians in China continues to grow, with at least 38 million adherents in 2020 (about 3% of the population), up from 22 million a decade ago. According to some experts, by 2030, China could the country with the largest Christian population in the world. "so although it's great if the government encourages them not to and take care of their body, they must not force them to." What if a Tibetan self-immolates in front of a child, scarring his/her young mind with such a traumatic experience (possibly for life)? Or worst, the child attempts to imitate such harmful behavior?
    7
  4198.  @elanor2123  "and if u believe technology and advancements are the most important factors defining the happiness of a person and the success of a country, I can't really convince u otherwise since it's quite true." In other words, it's true and you agree? Then you agree that the CPC did bring modernization to Tibet and improved the lives of the vast majority of Tibetans? Before modern technology, life on the Tibetan Plateau is harsh, with high attitudes, freezing temperatures, low-oxygen environments (it's the Himalayas after all). Food was scarce, since the mountainous soil in Tibet was often infertile. Rain clouds were blocked by mountains, resulting in low rainfall and making the land unsuitable for growing crops, so most Tibetans live a hard life. "Not every poor person are unhappy, and people could live happily without modern technology if they don't want to :)" You're always welcome to toss away your smartphone, your computer and other electronic devices, and see if you remain happy afterwards. Otherwise, what's the point of your words? "Pardon me if Japan never introduced any technology to China, but I assumed they did" So I take it you're unable to come with examples of technology that Japan introduced to China, and merely made an assumption that's all. "Shouldn't they have done some of that to China as well, in order to leech out more benefits? :/" So you're talking about a hypothetical scenario now? As far as I know, mainland China hasn't forced Tibet to pay for all the construction fees, since Tibet is part of China after all.
    7
  4199.  @elanor2123  Since you're so concerned about religion in China (despite being a atheist yourself), here's a question: Which country in the world prints and publishes the most Bibles in the world?
    7
  4200.  @worldofenigma1  You said: "For example in London there is a 'speaker's corner' in Hyde Park where anyone can speak their mind to an audience" I looked up the Speaker's Corner in Hyde Park and there are still rules and regulations to the content of speeches that the speakers have to abide by. According to Wikipedia: Speakers' Corner: Hyde Park: "Speakers here may talk on any subject, as long as the police consider their speeches lawful, although this right is not restricted to Speakers' Corner only. Contrary to popular belief, there is no immunity from the law, nor are any subjects proscribed." - Speaker's Corner: Hyde Park ... Therefore, my statement that you quoted (that Western and Islamic countries would not allow beliefs that do not fit their respective government's standards) still stands unchallenged.
    7
  4201.  @worldofenigma1  China not only prints the most Bibles in the world, but China is on track to have to have the world's largest population of Christians by 2025-2030 (according to Christian websites and sources). So the Bibles are used in China.
    7
  4202.  @worldofenigma1  You said: "Religious people are not against science though, so it is false to portray religion against science." It's no secret that Religion and Science fundamentally conflict with each other, and throughout history, religion has been hampering scientific progress. For example, Copernicus proposed that the Earth revolved around the Sun, which was considered blasphemy by the Church and Copernicus was persecuted for his theory (which turned out to be true). That's why I brought up imagining the possibilities of an atheist country, where superstitious beliefs are eradicated or not allowed to hinder scientific progress. Throughout our history, we have many religious countries, but never a truly atheist country. So if a country desires to become a truly atheist, then can't the country be allowed to pursue their own path? (BTW, you know that Elanor person I was talking to? She has publicly admitted to being atheist herself, meaning that she doesn't believe in any god, yet why is she so against China promoting atheism?)
    7
  4203.  @loveblindhate9318  Me too. The sheer volume of C-Dramas is staggering and the quality is getting better over the years.
    7
  4204. Agreed. Most Westerners seem to believe that the war began a few weeks ago, when in fact, Ukrainian ultra-nationalist fascists have been carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians living in Donetsk and Lugansk for 8 years, resulting in the deaths of some 13,000 people by shelling from both sides. Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that began after the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukoyvch by the USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine.
    7
  4205.  @MarkYeung1  Su Yiming has been training at Wanda Changbai Mountain International Ski Resort in northeast China's Jilin Province, as well as all over the world, such as in Phoenix PyeongChang in South Korea, and also in Cardrona Alpine Resort in New Zealand, then why should we be "thankful to U.S government"? It's those overseas Chinese with a "colonized mindset" that blindly worship their colonial masters and haven't decolonized their minds yet, that would say such a thing.
    7
  4206.  @calinyx  原来你是中国人啊？
    7
  4207.  @TheCluesRNTheBlues  You said: "Furthermore, capitalism has helped the Chinese very well." China's success was due to the government's policies towards capitalism, for example, imposing conditions that foreign companies seeking to set up shop in China have to transfer technology or else partner up with a local Chinese company. It was through these policies that China eventually acquired the expertise and know-how to develop industries of our own, that have grown to be able to lift hundreds of millions of Chinese out of poverty and into the middle class. Now those Chinese companies are expanding overseas and able to compete with Western companies too. It's because of Chinese government policy that this was made possible.
    7
  4208.  @borisnegrarosa9113  "The Chinese develop the areas that benefit them." And it is in China's benefit that African countries also benefit from development. African development means mutual benefits to both Chinese as well as Africans. China gains access to resources to fuel our economic growth, while Africans gain jobs, better infrastructure, and poverty alleviation. As Africa's middle class population increase, they also provide a market for Chinese goods, and in return the quality of life of Africans increase. It's truly a win-win scenario.
    7
  4209.  @RobertAmer  What @Arvind Talukdar is asking, is what if an Azov Battalion soldier dresses in civilian clothing and wears a white armband to infiltrate Russian forces?
    7
  4210. To think there was previously a chip shortage not too long ago.
    7
  4211.  Pain Zer0  Search for an article by Lowy Institute entitled: Debunking the myth of China’s “debt-trap diplomacy”. These are Western scholars debunking the myth of China's so-called debt trap.
    7
  4212. NATO was formed in response to rising Soviet military might. But the USSR has since dissolved in 1991 and NATO no longer serves any interests (except perhaps the U.S's hegemonic interests).
    7
  4213.  @chrishamlin5863  The reasoning is the same: it's the desire for children to learn about the other cultures.
    7
  4214.  @maicholaa7482  "神州 Shenzhou Yes wumao!" Why not attempt to refute my points instead of calling me a wumao? Just because my views happen to defer from yours?
    7
  4215. ROC been ruled by single-party authoritarian KMT for many many decades, and only in 2016 did another party (DPP) took over KMT. Why do people still say it is democratic, when ROC spent most of its life under authoritarian single-party KMT?
    7
  4216.  @DJs021  Many in Hong Kong (but not all of them) tend to have the colonial mentality. Colonial mentality is the internalized perception of ethnic or cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization. Such people tend to display a preference for the cultures of Anglo-Saxons, while harboring a disdain for any "non-Anglo" culture, including their own.
    7
  4217.  @pcost  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    7
  4218. China doesn't believe in the concept of a single "world leader" dictating to others what to do within their own territory. That's the US's approach. China's approach towards global governance is to support international institutions and voting in the United Nations. China has also offered to mediate peace talks in Gaza.
    7
  4219.  @covertpuppytwo3322  You said: "If China only spent a fraction of time and cost on its ally North Korea... maybe millions wouldn't have starved to death and they can turn on the lights at night" Chinese companies would gladly expand business in North Korea but it's the crippling US sanctions on North Korea that's preventing Chinese companies from doing more business in North Korea. Why don't you get the USA to lift sanctions on North Korea, so that Chinese companies can expand business in North Korea and develop their country?
    7
  4220.  @carlabroderick5508  Because Ukraine's sovereignty was compromised after the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukoyvch by USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine. We know this because of leaked audio recordings by Victoria Nuland (the same Nuland that recently testified in court about U.S bio labs in Ukraine). Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that was set into motion 8 years ago after the coup, in which over 13,000 people have been killed by shelling in Donbas region, with 80% of the civilian deaths occurring in rebel-held territories.
    7
  4221.  @dedoshucos  Huawei has unveiled its new chipset Kirin 990, the world's first 5G-integrated chipset in Berlin. Video: Huawei introduces Kirin 990, the world's first 5G-integrated chipset youtu.be/TNKtG3t22Po
    7
  4222. America has much to learn from China, if only they'd listen.
    7
  4223. @Ben Benito The United States has reversed China's designation as a currency manipulator. China's economy is expected to overtake the U.S's someday as the foreseeable future and this might just propel the Renminbi into potentially a reserve currency status.
    7
  4224. Sanctions don't work and help nobody, they only making the situation worse than it already is.
    7
  4225.  @cchannel7857  Search for an article: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies (By Gregory Clark)
    7
  4226.  @Gphilly819  Taiwan island inalienable part of China.
    7
  4227. USA accuse China of potentially abusing the Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now scrapped). Now the USA turn around and abuse their own extradition bill with Canada through the Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou case. The sheer irony!
    7
  4228. Trade can still occur via overland trade routes such as the Silk Road.
    7
  4229.  @dagsmoko3889  If Canada wants China to consider releasing the two Canadians, just get Canada to release Meng Wanzhou first. Canada started this whole mess, and it's up to Canada if they want to end this, they know what to do.
    7
  4230.  @linmuxi  "Shenzhou. The topic is whether India can be the next China, so it is about the future." If the topic is about the future, then why'd you bring up 20 years ago in the past?
    7
  4231.  @rufanuf1  "神州 Shenzhou LOL Typical Chinese or "Ferengi" mindset. It's all about "Economic Growth". A meaningless term for the average individual." Economic growth means that the average individual becomes wealthier, how is it meaningless? Taiwan's economic success was built under authoritarian single-party KMT leadership in the 1960s and 70s, not through the democratic reforms of 1990s. Even in mainland China, poverty alleviation efforts undertaken by the CPC have resulted in China eliminating extreme poverty, so how is this feat meaningless for the average individual?
    7
  4232.  @rufanuf1  You said: "Well that's the whole point of democracy." Throughout China's 5,000 years of history, there have never been such a system where the ordinary people are permitted to directly participate in political decision-making, through voting and elections. This Western-style democracy is a foreign concept to China, whereas the current CPC government closely emulates the strong centralized government system that successfully ruled China for millennia. Yet earlier you claimed: "Well your "Chinese heritage" has little to do with the CCP"?
    7
  4233. Huawei and Alibaba are not the only global companies in mainland China, there's so many other Chinese companies like Xiaomi, ZTE, Oppo, LENOVO, DJI, Haier, Tencent, JD, Baidu, Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, Bank of China, AgBank, ICBC, China Construction Bank, Ping An Insurance Group, Shenhua Energy, Sinopec Group, China National Petroleum, and so on. Many of these companies even made it onto lists by business magazines such as Fortune Global 500 and Forbes Global 2000 Sources: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies Forbes Global 2000 wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Global_2000 Fortune Global 500 wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_Global_500 But where are all those famous companies from Hong Kong? How can Hong Kong hope to compete with the sheer economic might of the mainland?
    7
  4234.  @CyrusJanssen  NATO had been expanding eastwards right up to Russia's doorstep, and Putin had voiced concerns which have all but fallen on deaf ears in the West.
    7
  4235. Colonialism teaches the colonised countries to worship Anglo-Saxons, especially the United States. Even the EU want to worship the USA rather than collaborate with China.
    7
  4236. @Random_Dude42 Joining NATO doesn't spare the country from possible consequences by their neighbors. Much like how USA did not tolerate Soviet missiles being stationed in Cuba, it's the same with Russia if Ukraine joins NATO.
    7
  4237. There are many foreign Muslims have visited China, travelled to Xinjiang and posted videos of their trips so that others like you can view them.
    7
  4238.  Modi WhinyThePoor  Russophobia and Sinophobia is spreading in the West, and affecting ordinary Russians and Chinese living there. It stems from the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset of the West towards Russia and China respectively.
    7
  4239. Covid-19 is like a global test that everyone has to take. China studied extremely hard for the exam and passed with flying colours and we are now celebrating our well-deserved graduation ceremony. Whereas Western countries had extra time to prepare for the test, yet many Westerners laughed at China's misfortune and mocked China's answers as too "draconian." Yet now they are accusing China of cheating, yet they are now blatantly copying China's homework after ridiculing them earlier.
    7
  4240. Coyote Starrk I clearly said "China is among the world's oldest 'continous' civilization still alive today" When did I ever said that it was the oldest continuous civilization? You claim China has been burned to the ground, but ancient monuments like Great Wall of China, Tomb of First Emperor of China (Qin Shi Huang Di) Terracotta Army, the Grand Canal are still around isn't it?
    7
  4241. Many Chinese are optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners are growing increasingly pessimistic and have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    7
  4242. Capitalism means that rich developed countries can buy up and hoard the vaccines for themselves and leave little to none for the poorer developing countries. For example, Canada has ordered enough vaccines for five times it's population. Imagine 1 Canadian having access to 5 vaccines, whereas 10 Africans have to fight for access to 1 vaccine.
    7
  4243.  @chrishamlin5863  Haven't you heard of popular Tibetan Chinese singer Ah Lan 阿兰? Her songs can be found on YouTube, sung in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese.
    7
  4244.  @FullPerspective  "And the claim the last conflict was in 1979 is not actually true," Name a country that China is at war with after 1979 then. Otherwise, the fact remains that China is currently peace and not at war with any country. The People's Liberation Army has not "Many countries has not been at war for more than 100 year, and have also not invaded anyone." Alright then, name 5 countries that have not been at war for more than 100 year, and have also not invaded anyone. "China has the 2nd or 3rd biggest militaries in the world. What is it there for?" Why to defend China of course. China has a history of being invaded by the 8 Nations (Austria-Hungary, British Empire, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, United States) during the Boxer Rebellion period. China learned long ago that a big country with a weak army will only invite invaders. "China is not a country of peace, like the US and Russia and India they use military force to exert power over others," China has a huge army yes, but China is currently at peace and not at war with any country. You've consistently failed to name a single country that China is currently at war with. "But there is a BIG difference between military used for defense and peace and military used for power, wealth and war." According to List of Overseas Bases, China has less than a handful of overseas bases that's all. "And China has definitely used their military against peace in the last 100 years." Who gave you the time limit of 100 years? Name me 5 countries that have not been involved in wars for the last 100 years.
    7
  4245.  @FullPerspective  "These islands where not recognized as being Chinese by Malaysia, the Philippines, Netherlands, the US and countless of other countries." The Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence in 1946 that the Spratlys was not Philippine territories as per the 1898 Treaty of Paris that Spain signed with USA. The Treaty Limits of the Philippines defines the maritime and territorial boundaries of the Philippines, which does not include the Spratly Islands. "The fact that China claimed the islands in 1947 does not alone give them right to them." It gives China a claim to the islands. Also in 1917, China was still being governed by the Nationalist Kuomintang which later fled to Taiwan island. And Taiwan Island today still maintains the claim to the 11 Dash Line, whereas the People's Republic of China has reduced it to the 9 Dash Line. "There is countless of land claims and disputes all over the world over territories, but what makes a country of peace which prevent war, is that the country will NOT lay hold of claims to territories where there is a dispute unless there is a INTERNATIONAL agreement allowing them to do so" As far as I know none of the claimants in the South China Sea are at war with each other, not China, not Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, etc. Which of those countries is China at war with? "The Spratly and Parcel Islands are not internationally recognized as belonging to China, nor is a lot of border dispute territories with India." The border dispute between China and India was created because after India was colonized by Britain, a British cartographer named Henry McMahon, arbitrarily drew up India's borders with China without consideration for existing historical boundaries, and yet till this day, India vehemently adheres to the McMahon Line (drawn by British) instead of looking at how the border existed historically.
    7
  4246.  @psl7360  If your country decided to put up your land for sale and Chinese buyers are interested in purchasing those property, then how is it considered grabbed?
    7
  4247.  @f1aziz  Perhaps Olaf Scholz deliberately picked the Gepard to send Ukraine, to keep those dissidents complaining that Germany isn't sending enough to Ukraine off his back, and occupy themselves with figuring just how exactly are they going to send those vehicles to Ukraine. It's a calculated move by Scholz to just buy time.
    7
  4248. Brahmos is only supersonic missile, but China has already tested hypersonic missiles like DF-ZF that travel many times faster than the speed of sound, and can bypass anti-missile defenses.
    7
  4249. China has stealth fighters like the Chengdu J-20, which have been spotted at Daocheng Yading airport in Tibet, which is world's highest altitude civilian airport. China has world's longest range ICBM, the DF-41, with operational range of 13,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the US LGM-30 Minuteman. How will the mountain range protect India, if Chinese missiles can literally fly over beyond the Himalayas?
    7
  4250.  @ColoniaMurder20  "神州 Shenzhou funny thing is majority of Southeast Asia were heavily influence by Hinduism and Buddhism culture before..." Siddhartha Gautama (Buddha) was born in Nepal, not India. Buddhism wasn't as popular in India as Hinduism, but Buddhism flourished in East Asia and spread to South East Asia.
    7
  4251. If you want to see millennia of Chinese history, visit Xi'an. If you want to see centuries of Chinese history, visit Beijing. If you want to see decades of Chinese history, visit Shanghai. If you want to see the future, visit Shenzhen.
    7
  4252.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwanese voters have seen how one country 2 systems worked out and voted accordingly." The Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now scrapped) that started the whole mess was proposed because of a certain incident. In Taiwan, a Hong Kong man (Chan) had murdered his pregnant girlfriend and stuffed her body in a suitcase, leaving her body in Taiwan before flying back to Hong Kong. Taiwan wanted to extradite this Hong Kong murderer to face justice in Taiwan, but Hong Kong had no extradition bill, that's why HK Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the Hong Kong Extradition Bill to cover up this loophole. But because the bill was cancelled, now a Hong Kong murderer is roaming unpunished for his crime.
    7
  4253.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "The extradition bill was one example. Even Carrie Lam admitted that it was a mistake." Mainland China did not force the extradition bill onto Hong Kong, it was Carrie Lam's own decision. And Carrie Lam still believes the extradition bill was the right thing to do. Video: Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam still believes she did right thing in trying to pass extradition bill youtu.be/3RoE9q8aa1M Because now that the bill is scrapped, a Hong Kong murderer is allowed loose without any justice being served for the victim's family members.
    7
  4254.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Carrie Lam apologized publicly about the bill on June 18th, 2019." Carrie Lam apologised for her mishandling of the extradition bill, not that the extradition bill was a mistake. Because the bill was scrapped and not implemented, a Hong Kong murder is roaming free and the victim's family can't have justice. Worst off, now this loophole has been exposed and Hong Kong might become a potential safe haven for criminals know to commit crimes in Taiwan and then flee to Hong Kong to evade extradition.
    7
  4255.  @robertmizek3315  But can US companies afford NOT to sell their products in China? China is the biggest, juiciest market in the world, for cars, electronics, gadgets, etc you name it. With this list being created, China can target US companies which can then forget about doing business in China.
    7
  4256. ​ @mrmateph729  I remember that one of the naval vessels that USA sent to the Nationalists was the USS Decker. The ship was renamed ROCS Tai-Ping (太平) under the Chinese navy, and one of the South China Sea Islands, Itu Aba, was renamed Taiping Island in honor of this ship that liberated the island from Japanese occupation.
    7
  4257.  @zackk4969  Then why is China currently the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people? What's the name of this renowned Chinese writer?
    7
  4258.  @amc3463  If Zelenskyy truly cared about the lives of Ukrainians, he would surrender. It's apparent by now that NATO and USA aren't going to send troops to defend Ukraine. Ukraine's application to join NATO is unlikely to be successful, because that would mean NATO is obliged to send reinforcements to defend Ukraine and I just can't see that happening. By refusing to surrender, Zelenskyy is only prolonging the war and using Ukrainians as human shields. By releasing prisoners and arming civilians with rifles and rocket launchers, he's trying to sow chaos and maximise the civilian casualties. By removing the age restrictions for conscription, Zelenskyy is effectively enlisting child soldiers to fight and die for his refusal to surrender.
    7
  4259.  @rpg1663  Again, because China stood a fighting chance against Imperial Japan, and eventually the U.S joined in the war against Japan after Pearl Harbor. But what fighting chance does Ukraine have against Russia, given that NATO and USA are clearly not putting boots on the ground to defend Ukraine? Ukraine is unlikely to join NATO because that would mean NATO is obliged under Article 5 to send troops to defend Ukraine if it were a member, so I just can't see that happening. So what other option does Ukraine have except for surrender? You really believe Ukraine is winning against Russia? Then why do NATO countries continue to send lethal aid like guns, stinger missiles and rocket launchers to Ukraine if they're winning against Russia?
    7
  4260.  @noelborbon6155  U.S President Biden is embracing the past and want's to take USA back to 1950, where USA was emerging as a global superpower. Chinese President Xi is embracing the future and wants to take China to the year 2050, where China is expected to have surpassed the United States both economically and militarily.
    7
  4261.  @bingdd168  Chinese Confucian culture values the elderly in society, that's why China prioritize keeping elderly folk safe, even if at the cost to the economy. Loss of income is tragic yes, but money lost can be earned back later. But once elderly people lost their lives to the virus, then no amount of money can buy back lives once they are gone.
    7
  4262.  @ellashy6539  That's a logistical problem that Shanghai has to work out. Some elderly are unable to get their medicines, but can you imagine how much worst the situation would be if Shanghai hadn't lockdown and the virus was allowed to spread rampant throughout the city and claim more lives? (On a separate note: I remember you supported Biden's election over Trump, well look at what Biden administration is bringing to USA, with rising inflation, gas prices, food prices, and the Russo-Ukraine conflict. It's a hypothetical scenario but if Trump had won his re-election in 2020, it's possible that Trump and Putin could work out a deal instead of the situation today.)
    7
  4263. ​ @rodiculous9464 Firstly, what makes you think that VPNs have to be western? Haven't you heard of China-based VPN providers? Secondly, does it really matter where I post my comment from? Why assume that I'm from America or Europe, instead of the rest of the Global South countries?
    7
  4264.  @SenorJuan2023  Has he ever been formally convicted in a court of law? If not, then it appears you're just speculating that's all. Also, you claim he was like that all his life, but why is it only in recent years is the attention focused on him? For example, the Jan 6 Capitol Hill happened 4 years ago, yet only now when 2024 elections are coming, is the spotlight suddenly shining onto him.
    7
  4265.  @SenorJuan2023  So if few people work for him and he has a bad reputation of not paying his attorneys, then shouldn't it be a piece of cake to land him in jail? Yet the fact remains that he hasn't been formally convicted in a court of law of any crime you accused him of.
    7
  4266. Russia is playing Chess. U.S is playing Checkers. China is playing Go (圍棋 Weiqi)
    7
  4267. In the West, the American monopolies like Apple, Amazon, Facebook, Google, dominate their respective industries and wipe out competition from smaller American firms, stifling innovation through competition. China's anti-monopoly law is clamping down on anti-competitive practices among Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, in order to "free up space" so that smaller companies can emerge in the market, allowing innovation through competition.
    7
  4268. Why would the host country enter into a deal that doesn't benefit themselves? The host countries aren't making any mistake, it's you that are mistaken.
    7
  4269.  @lugaritzbrown2250  Chairman Mao is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    7
  4270.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "India has a history of border conflicts with China and Pakistan." Again, can you guess who drew up India's borders? Answer: Britain. The India-China border was drawn not by Chinese or Indian, but by a British colonist, Henry McMahon. The McMahon line was drawn without even consulting Chinese input, and the fact that Indians continue to stick to the McMahon line is the source of border disputes between China and India today. Can't you see this is result of the colonial mentality?
    7
  4271. As a Chinese and a non-American, I actually support Trump's re-election over Biden's election. Trump can cooperate with China and he and Xi have successfully signed Phase 1 Trade Deal before, so we can do so again. However, Biden's stance towards China is unknown, that's why I support Trump's re-election.
    7
  4272. Here's the Chinese way to explain the Ukraine/Russia war to help clear up the confusion through a story: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), taking several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her, and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (i.e NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was enraptured with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him to hatch a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family, and of milking her ex-husband dry of his assets. The village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). Instead the village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) went crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief and his many wives were always on the sidelines in the ex husband and wife conflict, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would have to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... This is a translation from Weibo by Chinese netizen to hopefully explain the Ukraine/Russia crisis on a more relatable level.
    7
  4273. @Grim Reefer Singapore is a dictatorship too.
    7
  4274.  @87aggietim  Its not as though USA did not benefit from China. Chinese workers worked hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, clothing, sneakers, etc cheap, so that inflation in the U.S is kept to a minimum and the cost of living is lower than it should be. Think of the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursuits like cars, housing, luxury brands, or essentials like school fees, tuition fees, doctors fees and hospital bills. Americans have benefited from trade with China, just China did with USA.
    7
  4275. Agreed. Decoupling spreads fear and suspicion, leading to greater arms sales for the military-industrial complex.
    7
  4276. Because like you said, your foreign countries banned Chinese people from entering, but not your own citizens coming back from China. No quarantine for your own citizens returning home from abroad from China, but Chinese are banned from entering your country.
    7
  4277.  @wt6426  Look at the numerous racially-motivated attacks against Asian Americans (and Asian Canadians, Asian Australians, Asian Europeans and other citizens of Asian descent in other countries) But do mainlanders beat up foreigners in China, even when now, Europe and USA are the new epicentre of Covid-19 outbreak?
    7
  4278. The most salient point is that Meng Wanzhou finally gets to come home after nearly 3 long years, since her detention in Dec 2018. There has to be some level of compromise from all parties to secure the safe return of Meng Wanzhou back to her home in China, the fines imposed on Huawei pale in comparison to what she's been through.
    7
  4279.  @ryancrystal3607  The population of Uighurs has been increasing over the years, what killing and persecution are you talking about?
    7
  4280. Did you know Taiwan has been ruled by an authoritarian, single-party system (KMT) for nearly its entire life? How's that different from China being ruled by authoritarian single-party CCP? Only in 2016 (3 years ago) did another political party (DPP) finally took over KMT. All of Taiwan's progress had been made under a single-party authoritarian KMT, just like all of China's progress made under single-party CCP.
    7
  4281.  @ryana5435  If you don't understand the context behind cooking egg fried rice on the death anniversary of Mao Zedong's son, Mao AnYing, then of course you'll label Chinese as irrational. Why Chef Wang Gang specifically choose this date 25th Nov to upload a video of making egg fried rice? There are 364 other days in the year to choose to upload his video, why specifically do it on 25th Nov?
    7
  4282. @mav I remember back when anti-China trolls were demanding "Where's Fan Bingbing?" and later she reappeared in public stating that she was under investigation tax evasion and fined. Later, anti-China trolls shouted "Where's Jack Ma?" and now Jack Ma has reappeared, so they switch target. It's the same tactic again and again.
    7
  4283.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  "so the Earth considers who the largest polluter is when it adjusts its climate?" Western countries have been polluting the Earth since 200-300 years ago, back when then Industrial Revolution started in 1700s-1800s. China only industrilized in the last 40 years in comparison.
    7
  4284. 中俄相争～美国得利。美国应该是咱们真正的对手。 If China and Russia fight, America will profit. Our true opponent should be America.
    7
  4285.  @garyyoung3179  In defence of another NATO country? Why then are NATO countries involving themselves in Ukraine, when it's not even a member of NATO?
    7
  4286.  @GR7O  Source: New Satellite Video Shows China Pollution Vanishing During COVID-19 Lockdown forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2020/03/22/video-watch-from-space-as-air-pollution-vanishes-over-china-during-coronavirus-lockdown-then-returns/
    7
  4287.  @qingdaocitizen7957  Shouldn't it be the local Wuhan provincial government that tried to cover up the Covid-19, but it was thanks to to CPC that fired the corrupt officials and took over the reins in Wuhan?
    7
  4288.  @shmuelba1  You are comparing the population of an ethnic group (i.e Arab people) with that of a religious group (i.e Jews) which are not the same. Arabs literally refer to a member of Semitic people, and Judaism is a religion where its members can draw from any ethnicity (including Arab). So what's the whole point of your comparison then?
    7
  4289. Cyrus Jansen's videos promote the message of Building Bridges, Not Walls between the US and China, and more people should hear this peaceful message instead listening to the message of war (promoted by the West).
    7
  4290.  @Anonymous------  It's baffling really. I mean, it shouldn't really be all that difficult to find a American diplomat who can speak fluent Chinese and make him/her ambassador to China, in order to prevent diplomatic misunderstandings.
    7
  4291. Darth Vader eventually did something good in the end though. Who knows whether the US will follow?
    7
  4292. Agreed. I've noticed Cyrus' videos contain the peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" in them. Yet I've often seen some commenters accusing Cyrus of being a so-called "communist party shill" just for spreading such a positive message.
    7
  4293. forbidmyname If Chinese workers can do the job at dirt cheap wages, then are American workers themselves willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers? If not, then the prices of American goods are going to increase, because of higher American salaries.
    7
  4294. forbidmyname But the price of the iPhone is still largely determined by the wages of workers manufacturing the phone. If Chinese workers wages goes up, then the cost of the iPhone will go up. You call it low skills, but it factors greatly into the overall cost of the product isn't it? And just because many Chinese people are working in the manufacturing sector, doesn't mean that China will forever be stuck there. Already there are phones being designed by Chinese brands, such as Xiaomi and Huawei, that are beginning to expand into markets overseas.
    7
  4295.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Can we wear a "Support democracy " T-shirt in China?" Of course you can. (Taken from Quora) China is indeed more open than US in accepting differences. If you wear a shirt in China with words I love democracy, or I love USA. No one will care about you, you are perfectly safe. You are not worried at all. If you wear a shirt in US with words I love communism, or I love China. Geez, that sounds very dangerous. If you are lucky you will be verbally abused, else you will be physicaly abused, or shot in the worst case. - Osmond Ng, Quora user.
    7
  4296. Depleted Ukrainians
    7
  4297.  @simunlimun6838  If that's really the case, then you should be seeing 100% approval in those surveys. But the fact that around 85% of Russians approve of Putin (90% of Chinese for Xi) means that there are still opposition, even if only a minority.
    7
  4298.  @michaelkatz275  As of 2021, a staggering 81% of Sri Lanka’s foreign debt was owned by U.S. and European financial institutions, as well as Western allies Japan and India. This pales in comparison to the mere 10% owed to Beijing._ .. Source: Real debt trap: Sri Lanka owes vast majority to West, not China
    7
  4299. @MrCoremi You said: "Ask Cambodia how China build new cities there but no local workforce and so on." China's Belt and Road Initiative has given jobs to 20,000 local Cambodians, especially low-skilled and female workers. Chinese investment in Cambodia's garment industry has opened doors for nearly 1 million Cambodian workers. Already, massive economic impacts are taking root. In 2015, Cambodia declared lower-middle income status, but has now become one of the fastest growing economies in the world. Cambodians have already begun to reap the rewards of new infrastructure projects, such as the first public transportation system and construction of new roads. ... Source: What China’s Belt And Road Initiative Means For Cambodia - USC University of Southern California
    7
  4300.  @golazo  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w So which country is the real threat to peace on Earth here?
    7
  4301. Majority of those Hong Kong protestors are high school kids who haven't even graduated from school, yet they already think they know how to best govern Hong Kong. Their teenage minds haven't even matured and they haven't even stepped out into the real working world of adults, yet they already gotten swept up by political fervor.
    7
  4302. But Cyrus called out Peter Zeihan in his previous video and fact-checked him.
    7
  4303.  @MikeJones69696  "And somehow America is doing better than your country or any other country's" "But today, America is the only major developed society where the average income of the bottom 50 percent has gone down over a 30-year period." - Kishore Mabubani
    7
  4304.  @neil6958  Some home-owners ask for unreasonable compensation. In this video, the homeowner was offered 2 flats and 1.3 million yuan for her derelict house, but she demands 4 flats and 2 million yuan. Video: Chinese city builds a motorway bridge around house after owner refuses to move youtu.be/-laB4FiezBE Yet Chinese government just let her keep her crumbling house, and just build the infrastructure around her old house.
    7
  4305. @Ben Benito "神州 Shenzhou That's because China copies and then kicks the foreign competitors out." Did you read Forbes article: Why Google Is Quitting China? Baidu actually introduced several innovative features that Google didn't, and that's why Baidu's market share of China grew beyond Google's during the same period, and that's why Google eventually left China.
    7
  4306. You can't even spell out the individual words for ICBM properly yourself. China is the first country to test hypersonic glide vehicle-equipped missile intended for operational deployment, such as the DF-17. It is classified as medium range, around 1,800 and 2,500 km, not intercontinental. Source:The DF-17 is the first hypersonic glide vehicle-equipped missile intended for operational deployment ever tested. thediplomat.com/2017/12/introducing-the-df-17-chinas-newly-tested-ballistic-missile-armed-with-a-hypersonic-glide-vehicle/
    7
  4307. There was censorship during the 2008 Beijing Olympics, because of so-called "Tibetan monks and nuns" in Lhasa, Gansu, Qinghai, Sichuan suddenly started violently attacking random Han Chinese passers-by and Chinese police were forced to respond. The authorities were caught off-guard at the level of violence demonstrated by so-called "monks and nuns" and the fact that Beijing 2008 Olympics meant that many reporters and camera crews were present in China during this period, made the authorities suspect that the 14th Dalai Lama was behind this attempt.
    7
  4308. One thing I've come to realize over the years is that the "Nobel Peace Prize" has since deviated from it's original intention, and has long been hijacked and weaponized by the United States to wield against their opponents, in order to further U.S interests at the expense of others.
    7
  4309.  @whatohhellnoholduphuhohok.8205  China produced many successful Chinese companies like Huawei, Lenovo, ZTE, Xiaomi, Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, Haier, JD, DJI, ICBC, China Construction Bank, China Agricultural Bank, Bank of China, State Grid Corporation of China, China State Construction Engineering, China Minmetals, Ping An Insurance, China Shenhua Energy, Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, and this list is not exhaustive. Sources: List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks Fortune Global 500 wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_Global_500 Forbes Global 2000 wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Global_2000 But maybe one day, Chinese companies will be as famous as Indian companies worldwide! Everyone has at least heard of famous Indian companies, right?
    7
  4310.  @Tespri  China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilizations still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia have since succumbed to history. Throughout our history, China has witness the birth of many other nations, the rise and fall of various empires, and yet China has survived the violent passage of history to modern times relatively intact.
    7
  4311.  @HannarrMontannarr  "Taiwan has a much more robust high tech sector." China is home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight 神威·太湖之光 and Tianhe-2 天河-2 and in the 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance https://www.cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in research, and are used for computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion). China has world's 2nd largest research spending, only behind the USA and in 2016, China published more scientific and technical journal articles (in topics like physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences.) than even the United States. Sources: List of countries by research and development spending wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending List of countries by number of scientific and technical journal articles wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_scientific_and_technical_journal_articles
    7
  4312.  @larealidad6695  China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/b8cCsUBYSkw This makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity, some 856.4 billion kilowatt hours a year – more than double the amount produced by Brazil, in second place. The top three is completed by Canada, which produces 376.7 billion kilowatt hours a year. Source: China produces the most electricity from hydroelectric power weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/
    7
  4313.  @arthurlincoln9093  Whereas yours appears to be missing altogether.
    7
  4314. Under Saudi Arabian laws, women aren't even allowed to drive, yet USA is very good friends with Saudi Arabia?
    7
  4315.  @daviddave6796  You said: "Private sectors more rewarding and have that competitive morale." Without government regulation, private company's ultimate goal is monopoly, that's why American companies like Apple, Google, and Amazon dominate their respective fields, having eliminated the competition from smaller American firms. China has an anti-monopoly law to clamp down on anti-competitive practices in Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, in order to allow smaller companies to compete effectively with the giants.
    7
  4316. There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    7
  4317. I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    7
  4318.  @Andy-P  You said: "Putin says Ukraine has no right to exist." Tucker Carlson's interview with Putin revealed the intricate history of Ukraine and that its territory was contested, divided, and ruled by a variety of external powers such as the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, the Austrian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Tsardom of Russia and the Soviet Union. In fact, the name Ukraine comes from the old Slavic term for "borderland." Putin feels that the parts of Russia that were given away to Ukraine during Soviet times ought to be returned to Russia proper, and this includes Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc. You said: "You are saying the same for Taiwan?" Taiwan is historically part of China (since the Qing Dynasty) and Taiwan can exist as a province of China, but not as an independent country that's all.
    7
  4319.  @Andy-P  Hong Kong clearly have their own government separate from the mainland government. Previously, Hong Kong was under British colonial rule, during which there was no democracy, and the people of Hong Kong did not get to participate in any elections at all. Only during the period of the 1997 handover, did the people of Hong Kong finally get to vote for their favorite leaders, under the One Country, Two Systems policy. In fact, Hong Kong held more elections AFTER the 1997 handover back to mainland China, than they ever did for 150 years as a British colony.
    7
  4320.  @MarkYeung1  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979.
    7
  4321.  @ivyngo110  Chinese make up a fifth of humanity and can be found all over the world, including in Mexico. But what has Chinese living in Mexico entering the United States, even got to do with China?
    7
  4322.  @jaihindersingh  Jai Hind! Congratulations on India's successful lunar landing.
    7
  4323. Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out is due to perceived U.S backing. But it's no secret that U.S is in decline and China is rising. As long as mainland China doesn't get sucked into an unnecessary war with USA over Taiwan, then eventually, China will cross the threshold where U.S declines the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise. By which Taiwan's backing will evaporate and reunification would be inevitable.
    7
  4324.  @dedoshucos  Sounds like you're just ripping off this video: Once upon a virus youtu.be/Q5BZ09iNdvo
    7
  4325. The transition from a uni-polar world dominated by the U.S voice, to a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices is inevitable. The U.S cannot stop it, but they could at least take steps to soften the blow of falling from 1st place to 2nd place. Otherwise, many Americans (not all) are in for a rude awakening.
    7
  4326. Capitalism not only widens the income gap, it's also killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs rather than hoarded by the capitalists. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs.
    7
  4327.  @heliosign  The electrical grid could transition from fossil fuel to renewable energy sources like solar, wind and hydroelectricity.
    7
  4328.  @nobody342  But if Americans themselves put up their farmlands for sale, then can't Chinese buyers purchase those lands? And at the 5:03 mark of the video, it turns out that it's the Canadians that own the most of USA's farmland, not the Chinese. Yet it's the Chinese that are receiving flak, not the Canadians.
    7
  4329. I've seen American tourists behaving just as bad or worst, so every country have their own types of tourists.
    7
  4330. Photographs and videos show that the rocket part faces the northeast, which means that the missile may have arrived from the southwest, which is the direction of Ukrainian controlled territory such as Dobropillia. So it's possible that this attack on Kramatorsk was orchestrated by Ukrainian forces themselves.
    7
  4331.  Akimbo Soulassassin  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    7
  4332. I watched American MTV and the African American rapper grope the scantily clad dancer's chests, grab and slapped their buttocks, singing about how much they love women's bodies, how much they love money and how much they love to smoke weed, all the while throw money at strippers. Do Americans know what they are exposing their kids to?
    7
  4333. 有的人要反思自己为什么这么容易被外国人的反动言论洗脑。如果我们只站在一个局外人的角度去评价毛泽东，那么我们未免太自以为是。
    7
  4334.  @xerozero976  He has a German surname, was born in America and is currently living in Canada. He has been to numerous places (including China) yet why are you so unwilling to listen to his story? Instead you just claim that you don't need him, period?
    7
  4335.  @xerozero976  What is Biden administration doing for Texans whose water pipes are frozen, power outage leaving thousands of homes without power, in the middle of an icestorm in America?
    7
  4336.  @smoochie3331  If your assumptions are true, what's wrong with receiving money to promote the CPC's message (assuming that he's really being paid) of "building bridges, not walls"? Isn't it in both China's and the West's interest to promote such a positive message? And once again, Cyrus is under no obligation whatsoever to disclose his income information to you. You're not his tax collector or anything, you're just trying to discredit him that's all.
    7
  4337.  @westerntaiwan6893  I thought NASA has revealed that the ozone layer hole is gradually closing up, and 2019 recorded the smallest ozone layer hole size. Source: NASA: 2019 Ozone Hole is the Smallest on Record Since Its Discovery nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2019/2019-ozone-hole-is-the-smallest-on-record-since-its-discovery
    7
  4338.  @tyreemoss8990  According to World Tourism Ranking (Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings ) China is world's 4th most visited country, after France, Spain and United States, seeing some 63 million international visitors in 2018. China is also the most popular tourist destination in Asia, surpassing even other Asian tourist destinations like Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, etc.
    7
  4339.  @123axel123  President Xi is fostering unity in China, by tackling the problem of growing income inequality among Chinese (which is a consequence of unequal economic development). Mao Zedong's Common Propersity 共同富裕 was redefined by Deng Xiaoping to mean that some could get rich before others. But under President Xi, common prosperity is defined as more equal distribution of income (but also saying that it is not uniform egalitarianism.)
    7
  4340. Most people ride bicycles or electric scooters without a license too. It usually depends on how fast the vehicle can go.
    7
  4341.  @fcl3294  You said: "Remember the CPC killed 60+ million chinese people. The West didn't." China's population in 1950s was around 500-600 million, yet you're claiming that the communist party killed over 60+ million Chinese people? So you're saying China lost around 10% of our population, yet why is China today the country with the world's largest population at an estimated 1.4 billion people? Where did you get this death toll figure and how accurate is it?
    7
  4342. Aircraft carriers are indeed a way to project naval strength far beyond one's territorial waters.
    7
  4343. ​ @lorellaldos5263 You said: "the west invaded China (the english, the japanese) and nearly destroyed the country. Russia came to the rescue" Russia was one of the eight nations that invaded China, together with Germany, Japan, Britain, France, the United States, Italy, and Austria-Hungary. The city of Vladivostok was historically Chinese before becoming part of Russia today.
    7
  4344.  @lorellaldos5263  Helping? Russia was one of the eight nations that invaded China during the Boxer Rebellion. The Eight-Nation Alliance consisting of American, Austro-Hungarian, British, French, German, Italian, Japanese and Russian troops invaded China on 17 June and stormed the Dagu Fort at Tianjin. There's this Boxer Rebellion French cartoon of China being carved up like a pie and divided among the eight nations and Russia is one of them.
    7
  4345. Indeed. Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out stems from perceived U.S support. But U.S is in decline and China is rising, so time is on China's side. Eventually the U.S will decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge mainland China's rise, and Taiwan's backing would evaporate, making reunification unavoidable in the future.
    7
  4346.  @everythingandmore5537  About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. So can't the Communist Party of China return back to Mao's ways?
    7
  4347.  @everythingandmore5537  Beijing currently has the Covid-19 situation under control, better than most other Western cities, what alternative Winter Olympics venue could possibly replace Beijing, given the Western democracies utter failure to control the coronavirus situation in their lands?
    7
  4348. The windows are smashed, what are you talking about? Those rioters are an unruly mob, ruthlessly destroying everything they can get away with.
    7
  4349. 其实，中国和俄国伊朗加起来的贸易额不是很重要，最重要就是美国不把那些国家放在眼里，所以俄国和伊朗与中国成为盟友。
    7
  4350. Mark Treissman Agreed. US President Trump just unilaterally slap tariffs on steel and aluminum, without even going through the proper World Trade Organization channels. USA has put up a list of countries exempted from the tariffs, but many US allies like Canada, Australia and India are not on that list of exemptions. So countries like Canada are banding together to lodge a complaint to WTO about US tariffs.
    7
  4351.  @yarpenzirgin1826  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China. The Mongols incorporated those captured territories into the Yuan Dynasty China. Centuries later, the Manchurian conquerors did the same, incorporating Tibet into Qing Dynasty China.
    7
  4352.  @Andrew-ib7gs  China's supercomputer Tianhe-1 (天河-1) found that the lungs of a young American vaper hospitalized for "mysterious pneumonia" last summer could be exhibiting Covid-19 symptoms. scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3079046/chinese-supercomputer-and-american-doctors-clash-over-ai
    7
  4353.  @Andrew-ib7gs  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    7
  4354.  @Andrew-ib7gs  So you did say that you travelled to Xiangjiang (湘江)? Or did you actually mean Xinjiang (新疆) instead? You're attacking the Barretts on their inability to speak Chinese, yet you can't even distinguish between Xiangjiang and Xinjiang yourself?
    7
  4355.  @joelturley4847  Why are you calling me a wumao? Did I mention anything about the Communist Party of China here in this thread?
    7
  4356.  @MarkYeung1  You get your news from Ukrainian media, of course they'll exaggerate that they captured Russian tanks. But if that's the case then why is Zelenskyy asking NATO for more tanks and aircraft if they captured Russian tanks? Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky asked NATO on Sunday to send Ukraine "1 percent" of the alliance's tanks and aircraft and said his country has "already been waiting 31 days" for this much-needed equipment, The New York Times reported.
    7
  4357. Many Chinese warmly welcome Americans to our lands as visitors, and many still have dreams of visiting the U.S one day. However, many Americans (but not all) are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands as unwelcome, nor are some planning to visit China any time soon.
    7
  4358. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. In contrast, many Westerners (not all) are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    7
  4359.  @ALIEN_857  Some African Americans (but not all) suffer from the "colonial mentality" of worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture, while harboring disdain for any "non-white" culture, including Asian culture and even their own culture. Many Asians living in former colonies also suffer from this colonial mentality
    7
  4360.  @christianrodm  If you watch the video carefully, the eye contact maintained by the interviewees aren't overly long, and neither are they too short, so what's your point? At 1:40 for example, the man looks at the interviewer, the translator, even the camera and seems natural to me. Not too long and neither too short a duration of eye contact.
    7
  4361.  @stevenliew2507  Who gets to decide the global events? There are far more important world events occurring than just Russia-Ukraine or Palestine-Israel, but it's the west that's calling attention to them.
    7
  4362.  Darius Green  If you call 228 cases in Beijing massive, just take a look at 137,000 cases in the United States. And why aren't you calling Covid-19 by its proper name?
    7
  4363.  @augustuswoods4548  The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Source: Seventeen Point Agreement wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet.
    7
  4364. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since faded to history. Ancient China was a monarchy and has always been ruled by emperors since 3000 years ago, whereas democracy eventually failed. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, even Rome fell as a republic. Modern Western democracy has only 200-300 years of history so there is no guarantee that it will survive over the passage of time Yet China has survived the violent course of history following our own forms of governance.
    7
  4365.  @jascforfun7576  Perhaps Cyrus could show his agreement by simply nodding his head and smiling?
    7
  4366. I don't understand why those hosts think that Chinese people aren't free. Why not invite a Chinese national to give their opinion on their talkshow?
    7
  4367.  @Bitchslapper316  I watched the video and he's literally quoting United Kingdom newspaper The Sun so how's that Russian propaganda? Are you implying that that this UK newspaper is Russian propaganda?
    7
  4368.  @贺于  Germany in Chinese is 德国 "The Virtuous Country"_ so having 德 in your name (together with 中" center") sounds like you keep virtue close to your heart.
    7
  4369.  @koblongata  "神州 Shenzhou Let Tibet and Xinjiang vote and decide." Why should China let them vote and decide? China is not the West, so China is under no obligation to conduct elections in Tibet and Xinjiang, so why should China be subject to Western style of governance?
    7
  4370.  @ivanmunoz4484  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    7
  4371. The Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, but had to withdrew in the end.
    7
  4372.  @danielcockerill3761  And Western MSM will never show anything good about China. Anti-China sentiment is growing in the West. Western anti-China media is deliberately painting negative image of China and "demonising" our country, so much that many Westerners already hold negative opinion of China, despite not having been to China and see what life is like here for themselves.
    7
  4373.  @danielcockerill3761  Here's a video of modern day Lhasa, Tibet, China (filmed by WildFilmsIndia) and you can see how developed Lhasa has become under communist party rule. Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, and modern technology like cars, telephone cables, computers, smartphones, WiFi, the Internet, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo (By WildFilmsIndia) Even the poorest Tibetan farmer can afford a smartphone, connect to the Internet and shop online in Taobao and have his purchases shipped all the way to Tibet in the Himalayas. Because Tibet is part of China after all.
    7
  4374.  Moonland Almond  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China nearly quadrupled from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) and can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953–2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 ... Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    7
  4375. I wish more Westerners travel to China (once normal air-travel resumes of course) and actually see what life is like here for themselves, rather than form a negative opinion of our country from Western anti-China propaganda.
    7
  4376.  @redcapitalist  The Zionists are controlling America, that's why USA is powerless to intervene in Israel bombing Palestine.
    7
  4377.  @MarkYeung1  "That's why so many young Hong Kong people have given up on Beijing/Hong Kong and moved to the West in the last few years." Actually, according to Wikipedia: HongKongers: HongKongers: Total population c. 7.33 million (Regions with significant populations) 1. Hong Kong (7,234,800) 2. Mainland China (472,900) 3. United States (330,000) 4. Canada (215,775) 5. United Kingdom (145,000) 6. Taiwan (87,719) 7. Australia (86,886) 8. Macau (19,355) 9. Netherlands (18,300) 10. Japan (18,210) ... Source: Wikipedia: Hongkongers So according to those statistics, actually there are more Hong Kongers in mainland China than in the United States or Canada. The problem is those overseas Hong Kongers with a "colonial mentality" and blindly worship the Westerners.
    7
  4378.  @grandwonder5858  Capitalism actually favors monopolies that dominate their respective industries, gradually eliminating competition from smaller firms. That's how Apple, Facebook, Google, Amazon roll. Whereas China has an anti-monopoly law targeting anti-competitive practices in Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, in order to free up space for smaller Chinese companies to thrive, thus creating competition though innovation.
    7
  4379.  @EricKgetshepe  If you're referring to Netanyahu as "Muhammad Ali", then he's literally lost all respect in the international arena, by constantly beating up women and kids. Of course the real Muhammad Ali don't deserve to be compared with the likes of Netanyahu.
    7
  4380. Wuhan transformed from ground zero and the most infectious place, into one of the safest Covid-free cities in the world today.
    7
  4381. I had only wished that Cyrus took the time to properly research the Ukraine crisis, instead of rushing to produce a video response like he did with his previous video about Ukraine. I'm sure Cyrus is aware of Western anti-China propaganda portraying China in a negative light, so he should also be aware of Western anti-Russian propaganda doing the same to Russia.
    7
  4382. Cyrus, I'm not sure if you read China's foreign minister Wang Yi's remarks that China and Russia are each other’s most important close neighbors and strategic partners. The China-Russia relationship is grounded in a clear logic of history and driven by strong internal dynamics, and the friendship between the Chinese and Russian peoples is ROCK-SOLID.
    7
  4383.  @rpg1663  That's because Huawei has been the target of U.S sanctions. Other Chinese smartphone makers like Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Vivo, Oppo, etc have launched 5G phones.
    7
  4384. Fact: Hong Kong held more elections AFTER the 1997 handover back to mainland China, than they ever did for 150 years as a British colony.
    7
  4385. Excellent list. Since the 2014 coup d'etat of Ukrainian President Yanukovych by USA (and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine) Ukraine has been supporting ultra-nationalists and neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion, carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Donbas. Some 14,000 civilians have been killed in Donbas over the course of 8 years, by shelling by both sides, and the Minsk agreement was not honored. Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that began since 2014.
    7
  4386.  @MarkYeung1  China-Russia relationship is rock solid, but China is also friends with Ukraine, that's why China is sending humanitarian aid to Ukraine. Didn't you watch the video?
    7
  4387.  @markjapan4062  Polls have shown that around 70% of Russians support Putin and the special military operation in Ukraine, what makes you think Putin will be voted out?
    7
  4388. +manofsteel12 Mongolia has no standing treaty of shared defense with Russia. The Soviet Union intervened in the past, but since USSR dissolution, Mongolia's trade with Russia declined by 80% and China's relations and influence over Mongolia increased. China's so-caled "invasion" of Mongolia need not be through military means, but economic methods instead. Inner Mongolia split from Mongolia about 400 years ago, and the two states already express great difference in culture, language, etc. and it is difficult to see these two reunited again as part of Mongolia.
    7
  4389.  @FAILkipedia  "神州 Shenzhou Mariupol is 90% wiped with estimation of 50,000 civilians killed already." Mariupol's population is 446,103 (2017) so how does 50,000 civilians killed equate to Mariupol being 90% wiped? And what mobile crematorium technology are you talking about? If Russians had such cremation technology, they why did they left those bodies in Bucca for the Ukrainians to "discover"?
    7
  4390.  @annonetwothree1177  I truly hope so. But the cynic in me thinks Macron will eventually bend.
    7
  4391.  @UnimpressedGoose  So the Chinese government attempts to educate these Uighur extremist is considered propaganda in your eyes? Don't American kids also learn English and American history, while singing patriotic songs to love their country? How is what China doing any different?
    7
  4392. China was once an impoverished, war-torn, starving country in the past. Fast-forward till today and China has transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (in fact, the largest economy by PPP) the factory of the world, having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest military, the People's Liberation Army. Yet we should trust India to do the right thing? What has India achieved?
    7
  4393. Why does China have to be democratic to be accepted? China found success under authoritarian single-party CCP rule, and Taiwan was also successful under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, then why should democracy be implemented? Look, even Singapore found success under authoritarian PAP rule for more than 50 years. and the South Korean Dictator, Park Chung Hee, turned South Korea from a dirt-poor country (poorer than some African countries) into a 1st world country with his policies.
    7
  4394.  @wooshc  Why should China have vote system like USA? Ordinary people aren't able to vote responsibly (they don't turn up to vote, or they submit blank votes) or they lack political knowledge of world affairs to make important decisions regarding the country's future, or they are susceptible to politicians lies. That's how Donald Trump was able to seduce gullible American voters with false promises of making America great again, even when he has zero political experience! At least, in China's system, President Xi Jinping has at least 30 years of political experience and that's why most Chinese people have confidence with him at the helm of China.
    7
  4395.  @souki5639  The actual name in Chinese is zhōngguó gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where zhōngguó (中国) means China and gòngchǎndǎng (共产党) means Communist Party. So it should be the Communist Party of China, not the Chinese Communist Party. It should be CPC, not CCP.
    7
  4396.  @JohnBauman-h6d  Li Wenliang was spreading rumours about the coronavirus being SARS (which is clearly untrue, Covid-19 is not SARS) he wrote in private WeChat group that "There are 7 confirmed cases of SARS at Huanan Seafood Market." (华南水果海鲜市场确诊了7例SARS) so the government stepped in to stop the spread of unproven rumours that's all.
    7
  4397.  @hunyuekhan6422  Watch the whole video, those young people travelling to the rural countryside are communists party members themselves. The communist members catalogue poverty, track down those poor people, monitor their incomes, conduct local elections to decide whom to vote out of poverty, brainstorm ideas how to lift them out of poverty, relocate people living in remote areas, conduct self-criticism (a Mao Zedong tradition) and so much more.
    7
  4398.  @neil6958  George Orwell is a writer, he deliberately exaggerates the negative aspects of technology in order to maximise entertainment value and to attract readership, but it doesn't necessarily mean that reality will follow in the story's example. Yet Westerners are basing reality on fiction?
    7
  4399.  @namelesssnitchy  Why don't you go learn Mandarin Chinese like those singing African children?
    7
  4400.  @MarkYeung1  Chinese media draw their data and statistics from primary sources, whereas the Western MSM media paint a negative image of China, even though their articles are unsubstantiated by sources.
    7
  4401.  @deen8232  You are correct that China's huge population will result in having the most serial killers, pedophiles, etc. However, severe crimes in China are punishable by capital punishment under Chinese laws, so the people along the "lower end" of the bell curve can be sentenced to death if they commit serious enough crimes to warrant the death penalty. Over time, this will cull the "lower end" so to speak. Whereas some Western countries like Canada for example, abolished the death penalty. This means serious offenders will remain alive and could possibly commit more crimes in the future.
    7
  4402.  @educateyourself3872  Your wall of text already shows the detailed level of interactions between South Vietnam, Afghanistan and Ukraine with that of the US, and whether you like to admit it or not, there was a level of trust involved for those countries involved with the US. You're just trying to minimize it when it still exists and plays a role in the continued relationship with the US. Also, why didn't you post a wall of text towards Thomas for his comment then?
    7
  4403.  @rileybilbrey2801  Ukraine is supporting ultra-nationalist, neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion that's carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Luhansk and Donetsk. Over the course of 8 years, over 13,000 have died in those two regions due to shelling by both sides. The Minsk agreements was meant to stop the fighting in the region, withdraw heavy weapons from the front line and institute constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas in the Donbas region. But Ukraine have not lived up to their end of the agreement, so Russia is not starting a war, they are putting an end to one that began since the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukovych by USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine.
    7
  4404. Turkey also allows oil to pass through its territory into Israel. If Birol thinks Russia and China are just issuing statements and not taking actions, then why don't Turkey sanction oil entering Israel as the first step?
    7
  4405. Western countries been buying products, wasting food and polluting the Earth for over 200-300 years since Industrial Revolution happened, so isn't that already destroying the Earth? Western countries also ships tonnes of waste plastics, scrap paper and discarded textiles to China for us to recycle and recently the government has decided to finally ban importing waste.
    7
  4406. Taiwan island only continues to maintain its defiance against the mainland because they believe that they have the U.S support behind them. But it's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising and many economists predict that China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's economy sometime in the foreseeable future. As long as peace prevails, China will eventually cross this dangerous threshold after which the U.S would have declined to the point where they can no longer challenge China's rise. At which point, Taiwan will eventually be fully reunified with the mainland, once their backer, the USA is unable to continue supporting them.
    7
  4407.  @edgeg400  I thought Westerners were all about freedom, then can't China set up Confucius Institutes in the West, promoting Chinese language and culture, supporting local Chinese teaching internationally, and facilitating cultural exchanges? And regarding fentanyl, Chinese court sentences 9 fentanyl traffickers to death youtu.be/CH4I4hAk6Y8
    7
  4408.  @taobaoexpert123  One of the 5 demands of the Hong Kong protestors was that all previously arrested rioters be set free and cleared of any criminal charges, even those who looted and burn Hong Kong public property. It's obvious that Hong Kong police aren't going to bow down to such a ridiculous demand.
    7
  4409. @Tao Te Ching The Mongols knew next to nothing about civilization. During the Mongolian Yuan Dynasty, who grows the food necessary to feed the empire? Mongols were nomadic tribesmen, living off the lands and moving to greener pastures when food is scarce, so the Han farmers had to work to grow food to feed the empire. Who plans the villages and towns? The Mongols lived in temporary housing (named yurts) and they nothing about permanent housing, so Han builders and architects plan the towns, build roads and houses according to Chinese architecture. And who ensures the daily affairs of the empire are kept running smoothly? The Mongols know nothing about governing an empire as big as China, so Han bureaucrats ensured the daily affairs of the empire are kept running smoothly. All the Mongolians knew was warfare, to pillage towns, steal food, and destroy priceless works of art that's all.
    7
  4410.    China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    7
  4411.  @ronniechew6566  During the First Indo-China War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons to rifles and machine-guns), ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla force with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help the Vietnamese fight for independence From 1950 to 1954 the Chinese government shipped goods, materials, and medicine worth $43 billion (in 2019 dollars) to Vietnam. From 1950 to 1956 the Chinese government shipped 155,000 small arms, 58 million rounds of ammunition, 4,630 artillery pieces, 1,080,000 artillery shells, 840,000 hand grenades, 1,400,000 uniforms, 1,200 vehicles, 14,000 tons of food, and 26,000 tons of fuel to Vietnam. Yet some Vietnamese Nationalist conveniently forget Chinese aid given to them during their fight for independence.
    7
  4412.  @AmbietsRato  Tibet was became part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Thibet as well as Song Dynasty China, and then including those territories into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors did the same thing with Tibet centuries later during the Qing Dynasty. Tibet temporarily broke free of China in 1912, but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951. Today, countries all over the world recognize Tibet as part of China. So what's there to complain here? As for the South China Sea, it was Republic of China 🇹🇼 that published the 11-Dash Line in 1947 and laid claim to the South China Sea Islands. After the KMT fled to Taiwan Island, they retain their claim to the 11-Dash Line and still claim the South China Seas till this day. The People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 inherited the claim but reduced it to the 9-Dash Line, but nevertheless the claim remains, so if you support ROC's claim to South China Sea, then why not PRC's claim then?
    7
  4413.  @AmbietsRato  "The 14th Dalai Lama ratified the agreement on 24 October 1951, but later repudiated it on the grounds that he had rendered his approval for the agreement while under duress." Tibetologist Melvyn Goldstein stated that according to international law, this does not this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid. "Their feeling of duress derives from the general Chinese threat to use military force again in Central Tibet if an agreement was not concluded. However, according to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid." - Melvyn Goldstein, Tibetologist.
    7
  4414.  @ianbelanger7459  Protectionism on the part of China? In reality, the United States is the most protectionist country in the world. According to data from Global Trade Alert, the US has taken over 800 protectionist measures since 2008, and the European Union has over 300 protectionist measures, while China is only in the range of 200-300. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Protectionism)
    7
  4415.  @sabinereynaudsf  Even USA is employing surveillance and facial recognition software to help the authorities identify the people behind the January 6th Capitol Hill riots, what's wrong with surveillance when it helps keep countries safe?
    7
  4416. @Jack Singapore has been ruled by authoritarian single-party PAP, for its entire life as a nation! For over 50 years, the PAP ruled Singapore with iron fist, and Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore's founder) jailed and exiled many of his political dissidents. But under authoritarian PAP rule, Singapore grew from a sleepy fishing village nation, into an world class country surpassing many of its neighboring countries (Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, etc) It's because 50 years of PAP rule, enabled Singapore's leaders to make long-term plans for Singapore. Likewise, China has been ruled by authoritarian single-party CCP for 70 years, and that's why China is rising economic power today. Don't you see the similarities?
    7
  4417.  @Mind_Unclouded  You said: "You can find more Chinese culture and traditions in Taiwan than in China." Are you sure? Take the Hanfu Movement (汉服运动) for example and it has exploded in mainland China as compared to Taiwan island. Hanfu (汉服) is the traditional clothing of the Han Chinese, and you can find many videos of Chinese people wearing this traditional clothing in mainland China than you can in Taiwan. Yet you're claiming you can find more Chinese culture and traditions in Taiwan island than in the mainland?
    7
  4418.  @jamilbrugsen1362  Who says ordinary Chinese do not have access to YouTube? There's so many Chinese Youtubers, one of the most famous is 李子柒 LiZiQi. Her YouTube channel has more than 2.7 billion views and 16 million subscribers, as verified on 21 August 2021, which is a Guinness World Record for "The most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube".
    7
  4419.  @pbworld7858  Good answer. It's a pity that your comment does not appear because of YouTube censorship.
    7
  4420.  @real_dddf  Well argued!
    7
  4421. NED represents the United State's Need to Exert Dominance over other country's internal affairs.
    7
  4422.  @makeromaniagreatagain9697  According to some Christian experts, the number of Christians in Communist China is growing so steadily that it by 2030 it could have more churchgoers than America. Source: China on course to become 'world's most Christian nation' within 15 years telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/10776023/China-on-course-to-become-worlds-most-Christian-nation-within-15-years.html And why should China become more democratic you tell me? Why allow ordinary people to vote in elections regarding your country's future? Ordinary people may not know how to vote responsibly (e.g. they do not turn up to vote) or they may base their vote on emotions instead of logic (e.g. Many British dislike foreigners so they voted for Britain to leave the EU.) Or they may simply lack political awareness of the country's situation or get swayed by politicians. That's how Hitler was able to come to power by preying on German people's resentment towards the humiliating Treaty of Versailles and promising to make Germany great again (which admittedly he did). Similarly, Donald Trump was able to come to power by preying on gullible American's animosity towards China with false promises of making America great again. So why should China be more democratic then?
    7
  4423. Perhaps one day Alex, you could visit your homeland and see what life is like here for yourself.
    7
  4424. The U.S has repeatedly invaded countries and Western countries have never slapped sanctions on the US the likes of which Russia is being subjected to right now. It's double standards at work here.
    7
  4425.  @igorjee  "神州 Shenzhou your propaganda is as bad as your anime." What has Chinese anime even got to do with this? Chinese anime industry is rapidly growing and some Chinese anime are catching up to Japanese in terms of quality, even some series have been adapted for Japanese audiences because of their popularity. Video: This Chinese Anime Looks Better than Japanese Anime? youtube.com/watch?v=jA5GVsZSiu8 Video: Chinese Anime with Over 1 Billion Views Gets Localized for Japan youtube.com/watch?v=XTtiDtz59FA
    7
  4426.  @canhaktan9674  VICE News is trying to mislead you by painting a negative picture of Xinjiang as a police state. Here is video clip of a streetwalk in Urumqi, China in 2019, and there are aren't even any policemen in the footage. Urumqi, China Streetwalk 2019 youtube.com/watch?v=W-WguBtFA_w
    7
  4427.  @cx9882  Chinese military has not seen any actual military combat since our last major conflict in 1979 and China today is currently not at war with any country. How does that make China good at killing? Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, etc, even in the 21st century. The USA is enacting regime change by cutting off those countries "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. So isn't USA clearly better at killing people than China?
    7
  4428.  @timmykirls2352  China needs to do more to improve our image to the World.
    7
  4429.  @hhafty  Then what evidence have you presented? You given nothing at all except just claiming to be from Malaysia that's all
    7
  4430.  @ebolmao4129  What logic is this? You mean because I know way too much for an average person, suddenly means my comments biased? Where is the connection you tell me?
    7
  4431.  @cx9882  Who says CCP is currently killing Uighurs and Tibetans? The Uighur and Tibetan populations in China have actually grown drastically over the years. For example, here is the Uighur population statistics: 3,640,125 (1953) 3,996,311 (1964) 5,917,030 (1982) 7,207,024 (1990) 8,399,393 (2000) 10,069,346 (2010) Here are the Tibetan population statistics: 2,775,622 (1953) 2,501,174 (1964) 3,821,950 (1982) 4,593,072 (1990) 5,416,021 (2000) 6,282,187 (2010) Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups So what makes you think China is killing Uighurs and Tibetans when their population numbers have swelled over the years?
    7
  4432.  @ebolmao4129  Nowadays with Internet access, sources are available everywhere at the click of a button, so what's wrong with me coming up with sources so quickly and precisely? I have cited evidence to support my arguments, so suddenly that means I am biased because I know more than the average person about China?
    7
  4433.  @ebolmao4129  Who do you think you are to demand answers out of me? I have given my responses to China's infrastructure projects. Did you know that China is unmatched in infrastructure building? We are home to world's largest highspeed railway network and our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even tried balancing small objects on their edges, like coins, stationery, smartphones, in trains moving at 350 kph, and the objects remained balanced (even stagnant water remains still) for a long period. Here is one such video: Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE
    7
  4434.  @ebolmao4129  " I also highly doubt everyone in China has access to internet," China has world's largest internet population at 765,367,947 users and Chinese Language is the 2nd most common Internet language in after English, so there are so many Chinese websites that you've probably never even accessed before. China is also world's leading e-commerce market thanks to rising Chinese companies like Alibaba and Tencent. Source: List of countries by number of Internet users wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_Internet_users Top Ten Internet Languages in The World internetworldstats.com/stats7.htm China’s World Leading E-Commerce Industry marketingtochina.com/chinas-world-leading-e-commerce-industry/
    7
  4435.  @rosaliethomson4655  It is difficult for China to enter the current silicon chip industry, because of huge technological hurdles, as well as U.S restrictions on chips to China. However, silicon chips are nearing the end of their natural lifespan. Despite technological advances, humans are unable to make chips any smaller and we are approach the theoretical limit of silicon chips. The next option is to switch the semiconductor material from silicon-based chips to carbon-based chips (made from graphene or carbon nanotubes) which offer several advantages such as better efficiency and less power consumption. China has already made several breakthroughs in carbon-based chips and if China could produce our own domestic carbon-based chips, then we won't be reliant on silicon chips and could potentially leapfrog other countries.
    7
  4436. @反共抗俄 China had helped Vietnam gain independence from the French ("former French Indochina" like you said). During the First Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons, ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla force with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help the Vietnamese fight for independence from the French. From 1950 to 1954 the Chinese government shipped goods, materials, and medicine worth $43 billion (in 2019 dollars) to Vietnam. From 1950 to 1956 the Chinese government shipped 155,000 small arms, 58 million rounds of ammunition, 4,630 artillery pieces, 1,080,000 artillery shells, 840,000 hand grenades, 1,400,000 uniforms, 1,200 vehicles, 14,000 tons of food, and 26,000 tons of fuel to Vietnam.
    7
  4437.  @xueueux  Agreed. For decades, the vast expanse of territory stretching from Australia to India was referred to in Washington as “Asia-Pacific”, but the U.S has began renaming it as "Indo-Pacific".
    7
  4438. 蘇玖離 辛苦你啊。
    7
  4439.  Conan  "Without it China starves!" China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. Source: Fishing Industry in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishing_industry_in_China China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_producing_countries_of_agricultural_commodities
    7
  4440.  @Erakius323  Where's your evidence for Russia losing 3 to 1? If anything, the Russian Federation has gained 4 oblasts, namely Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia. That you certainly can't dispute.
    7
  4441.  @Erakius323  "If Russia is able to achieve such excellence in combat, they would not have had to mobilise. Care to explain that?" The mobilization is due to the addition of 4 oblasts (Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia) meaning that more soldiers are needed to maintain order in those territories.
    7
  4442. Why are you calling it by it's improper name? It's proper name is Covid-19.
    7
  4443.  @stunningandbrave2520  ">so what do you think China was doing? Starving and/or fighting each other." Yet, for much of history, China has remained the most populous in the world, which just goes to show how little you know of Chinese history, if you think that's what China has been doing for 4000/5000 years. Haven't you heard of the Silk Road, in which a valuable commodity originating in China was traded to the rest of the world?
    7
  4444.  @asserpopulous69  Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationthailand.com/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more
    7
  4445.  @DonutsIceCreamAndCottenCandy  It's from Weibo and its a Chinese way to explain the Ukraine crisis.
    7
  4446.  @宋庆-i4m  I still answered your question didn't I? Not my fault you choose to phrase your question that way.
    7
  4447.  @twood2032  Agreed. The question is not whether China can rise peacefully, it is whether China will be allowed to rise peacefully by the USA.
    7
  4448. Shouldn't Americans be more concerned about rising Covid-19 cases and their healthcare getting swamped, rather than worrying about China? Majority of Chinese citizens actually support the Chinese government's handling of the Covid-19.
    7
  4449.  @Kitchguy  "nobody in America is chanting for war, it's totally the opposite." The anti-war people are literally calling for a No-Fly Zone over Ukraine, which would lead to WWII.
    7
  4450.  @msimon6808  I think you've misinterpreted my example. The U.S dollar is backed by nothing, much like how Coyote ran off a cliff and is running on mid-air (because cartoon physics). The U.S Dollar is sustained by other countries "belief" in it in, but eventually gravity will "catch up" to Coyote.
    7
  4451.  @andrenogueira5058  China is primarily not an immigrant country like the United States. China has to world's largest population (estimated 1.4 billion) so China has no real need for immigrants. We already have the manpower so our immigration policy is rather strict as a result, only allowing the bare minimum number of immigrants and no more than absolutely necessary. Priority Chinese citizenship is granted to overseas Chinese returning to the homeland, and to foreigners who have something to contribute to China (i.e doctors, lawyers, engineers, scientists, researchers, etc). Whereas the immigration policy in the U.S is so loose. As long as an immigrant has a family member or relative who's a U.S citizen, they are are themselves elligible to apply for U.S citizenship. That's why are there foreigners who marry Americans for U.S citizenship, so that they can import their families over, much to the disgruntlement of local Americans.
    7
  4452.  @robertoosido1232  "神州 Shenzhou Because they are causing trouble, so there is a war." Excuse me but what war is happening in the South China Sea? Which countries have declared war in the South China Sea? And it doesn't change the fact that the U.S does not ratify UNCLOS, yet why is the U.S carrying out FON operations in the name of UNCLOS?
    7
  4453. And he debunks Western propaganda using mostly Western news sources too, yet the China haters label him a shill, just for reading out Western articles and checking out NGO websites.
    7
  4454. China is arguably the best at infrastructure construction. For example, China is home to many of the world's tallest, longest and highest bridges.
    7
  4455. Agreed. In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, reining in companies when they gone too far. Whereas in the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    7
  4456.  @SwedeenXBL  You said: "I've read that report why do you think I dropped Georgia and continued on the other points that were brought up?" So you read that report, and instead of acknowledging it, you continue to mock me as a "Chinese guy with a reading disability" and my English proficiency? You said: "I mentioned the claimed Donbas genocide and mass-graves which Russia has never given any proof of til this day." I pointed out that according to UN figures, from 2018 to 2021, 81.4% of civilian casualties in the Donbas war came in rebel-held territory, so how is Russia responsible for Ukraine's war in Donbas? You said: "like that has any relevancy to the original arguement of whether the missile was Russian or not." Again, it's because Ukraine Armed Forces also use Russian weapons, so even if you claim a BUK missile can be traced back to a certain brigade, it doesn't conclude that it was that brigade that fired it. The 53rd AA Brigade wasn't deployed in Hrabove for crying out loud.
    7
  4457.  @SwedeenXBL  You said: "Basically what you're saying is sovereign countries are not allowed to join and apply for NATO membership because Russia says so, okay." Because NATO is not a defensive organization, so shouldn't Russia reserves the right to object to countries joining a organization that threatens Russia's sovereignty?
    7
  4458.  @americanpatriot126  Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-graft campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign. But even after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    7
  4459.  @milaong9618  I've been to Singapore in South East Asia, and some of the Chinese Singaporeans look down on Chinese mainlanders. For example, when I speak Mandarin, some of the locals could tell I was from China and treat me coldly. But when I spoke English to them instead, many locals started warming up. It's clear that some people in Singapore don't hold favorable views towards China, but hold favourable views to the West. Not all of course, but some.
    7
  4460. China focus on domestic issues, instead of intervening in other country's internal problems. U.S intervene in other country's internal problems, instead of focusing on domestic issues.
    7
  4461.  @grandwonder5858  "there’s a website that claims there are only 24,161 Chinese restaurants in the US" I found that website. But when it was asked which states have the highest number of Chinese Restaurant businesses, the answer it gave was California (31,770 businesses), New York (20,647 businesses) and Texas (18,499 businesses) which already exceeds the number 24,161.
    7
  4462.  @burnsgri  So if China allegedly created and purposely released the virus to kill off our huge elderly population, then why did China build 2 temporary hospitals to save as many people as possible? Why did China insist on lockdowns and other measures to curb the spread of Covid-19 and protect our elderly people? Your conspiracy theory doesn't seem to hold water here.
    7
  4463.  @louisfill849  But Rome eventually fell but China's empire survived the passage of time relatively intact. In modern time, Chinese territories still consists of Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, North China, South China, Hainan Islands etc, whereas Rome is no more, and its territories (UK, France, Germany, Turkey, Egypt, etc) are separate countries today. Time was the greatest enemy for both.
    7
  4464.  @gregorjerman973  I clearly civilization, not Imperial dynastic rule. And the modern Japanese imperial family does not participate in Japanese politics so what's the point of having imperial family without imperial rule? Don't you see the point here? As for Chinese civilization, our written language has been continuously in use since 1200 BCE and is still alive and widely used today. Whereas other ancient languages like Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia), Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered 'dead' languages today.
    7
  4465.  @johnbuckner2828  It's not true that Russia and China don't have to worry about the next election or the will of the citizenry. Studies and surveys have indicated a high level of approval for Russian President Putin as well as Chinese President Xi according to Russians and Chinese respectively. On the other hand, despite the low level of approval among Western leaders, many of them are still taking actions that seemingly go against the majority of their citizenry's wishes.
    7
  4466. If you truly believe in Ukraine governing itself, determining its future, its leaders and the sort of democracy and political economy it wants, then you should be calling for fresh elections in Ukraine. Zelenskyy's term as President has ended, and yet he's not calling for elections in Ukraine, so how is that considered a democracy?
    7
  4467.  @phlei95014  You said: "The USA is a peace keeper , has maintained tte stability across tte strait" The U.S is a warmonger having been involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Yemen War, etc, how is it a peace keeper? Didn't Nancy Pelosi choose to visit the island in violation of the One China Policy, an act which could have potentially triggered a conflict in the Taiwan Strait? Yet you're seemingly blaming the communist party of China for "changing the status quo"?
    7
  4468. Perhaps Indian government shouldn't let these migrants return to their villages (where the vulnerable elderly folk are) at least gather them into a quarantine zone for 14 days, before letting them leave for their villages. Alternatively, each village could set up their own quarantine zone for arriving migrants. The Bottom Line is keep the virus away from the elderly.
    7
  4469. +misty bonnie Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. Eg. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. But its already 2018, and China's economy is still going strong, so its clear that Western propaganda is simply biased against China and has been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years. So why do people still think China is going to fall soon?
    7
  4470. Jack Ma was good when he puts the interests of others before himself, (i.e when he uploaded Covid-19 prevention handbook and made it available to all). But if Jack Ma wants to put the interests of himself and his own company over that of Chinese people, then he needs to be taken down a notch by the government.
    7
  4471.  @andrenogueira5058  Actually, as of March 2022, a total of 147 countries have signed up with China's Belt and Road Initiative to share in mutual prosperity. In Africa for example, China has overtaken the U.S to become Africa's largest trading partner. Sri Lanka's bankruptcy was caused by the West. As of 2021, a staggering 81% of Sri Lanka’s foreign debt was owned by U.S. and European financial institutions, as well as Western allies Japan and India. This pales in comparison to the mere 10% owed to Beijing. Hambantota is not really a new port, and it's not Chinese, it's been leased to Chinese companies to develop for 99 years. But after 99 years, the lease would have expired and Hambantota port returned back to Sri Lanka, so in the long-run, Sri Lanka stands to benefit. India is still part of BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO, which recently held a meeting in Samarkand) so there are opportunities for India and China to cooperate. Even Iran has signed a memorandum to join the SCO, and even in BRICS, Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, and Egypt could apply to join the bloc. China is currently at peace, which of those countries you mentioned is China currently at war with?
    7
  4472.  @MarkYeung1  "Why did 2 million Hong Kong people protested PEACEFULLY in June 2019? What did the beloved Hong Kong government do?" The 2019 Hong Kong riots began because a Hong Konger (named Chan) travelled to Taiwan with his pregnant girlfriend (named Poon) and then proceeded to strangle her to death in the hotel, before returning home to Hong Kong and leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. He has since confessed and Taiwan wanted to extradite him to face charges, but Hong Kong realized that there's no extradition procedure and so, Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed an extradition bill to cover up this loophole. Yet those protestors haven't even read the extradition bill before taking to the streets in protest.
    7
  4473.  @ColoniaMurder20  Vietnam has been influenced by Chinese civilization, even their Vietnamese clothing (Viet phuc 越服) bear similarities to Chinese clothing. The Vietnamese Bamboo hat shares much in common with the one in China. There are also significant Chinese diaspora living in Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, etc. Also the Taiwanese aborigines are descended from farmers from China who arrived on the island around 5,000 years ago (which is around the start of Chinese history).
    7
  4474.  @ColoniaMurder20  Many people in South East Asia use chopsticks as a popular eating utensil, which were invented in China before spreading to South East Asian countries.
    7
  4475.  @ColoniaMurder20  Many Filipinos (but not all of them) tend to have the colonial mentality. Colonial mentality is the internalized perception of ethnic and cultural inferiority as a result of colonization. They have an ingrained preference for Anglo Saxon culture over any "non-white" culture, including their own.
    7
  4476. People living in both USA and China deserve the right to life and protection from Covid-19. China is taking measures to deal with the Covid-19 situation and prevent any unnecessary loss of life, but it appears U.S government is seemingly letting Covid-19 roam free and infect their people.
    7
  4477.  @lawrencetaylor4101  The issue is that U.S arms manufactures find the most expensive solution to a problem, while other countries (like Russia or China) find simple relatively cheap solutions to solve problems.
    7
  4478.  @bungkusi2432  While Cyrus can see through the lies on what Western MSM says about China. But he can't do the same when the West talks about Russia.
    7
  4479. I do know that Hong Kong did NOT experience democracy under British colonial rule rule. No elections by Hong Kong were ever held, while it was British colony. Only after the Hong Kong handover to mainland China, were the first elections by Hong Kong ever held. So why people of Hong Kong still complain when they finally get to vote for their favorite leader in elections? Were any elections in Hong Kong ever held, prior to the handover to China?
    7
  4480.  @cheongwenpa  "神州 Shenzhou Singapore is very pragmatic. It will choose whatever that is best for its people ." Could you explain how has Singapore's sanctions on Russia actually benefited the people in Singapore? No other South East Asian country sanctioned Russia, and as a result of Singapore's action, Russia has added Singapore to it's list of "unfriendly countries." If anything, Singapore has just given up it's reputation as "neutral" country and was it worth it?
    7
  4481.  @sababugs1125  Biggest country certainly, but not the biggest bully. That award goes to the United States of America.
    7
  4482. Australian PM Albanese's visit to China could mark the beginning of warming relations between Australia and China.
    7
  4483. China isn't interested in spreading "communism" unlike the former Soviet Union (or the United States with "democracy") President Xi has publicly stated that China's system is not for export. “We will not import other countries’ models, and will not export the China model,” Xi said at a political a forum.
    7
  4484.  @xerozero976  Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-graft campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign, but after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    7
  4485.  @kaspernielsen9149  If you want to talk about prison populations, then it's America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate
    7
  4486. @Al Castel Source: The Times: France fights terror with camps for re-education If Westerners can do it, why not China?
    7
  4487. Chinese are no stranger to hardship and it's through perseverance that Meng Wanzhou eventually won her freedom. It's my hope that possibly that one day in the future, Huawei will be vindicated in the West and taken off the blacklist.
    7
  4488. @golden retreiver Who said China is erasing Mongolian language classes in Inner Mongolia? Here's CGTN video that debunks that idea. Video: The Point: Are media exaggerating fears over new Mandarin classes in Inner Mongolia? youtu.be/B4yvxz0cehg
    7
  4489.  @asheru9254  To be completely blunt about his origins, Gordon Chang is only half-Chinese, born to a Chinese father and an American mother of Scottish ancestry. It's just sad that he has been fed anti-China Western propaganda all his life and raised feeling ashamed of half his heritage.
    7
  4490.  @fl338  In his speeches, President Xi Jinping calls for the peaceful reunification of Taiwan island with the mainland. For example, is there a build-up of People's Liberation Army troops in the mainland/Taiwan border Taiwan Straits (like the build-up of Russian troops at its border with Ukraine)?
    7
  4491.  @tottiwulezhou  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, back when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during the Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Xinjiang was part of China since 200 BC during the Han Dynasty, where it was known as Xiyu (西域) "Western Regions"
    7
  4492.  @MarkYeung1  The problem is that in the Marvel comics, Shangchi's father is Fu Manchu, a Yellow Peril caricature that was popular in America at that time. Also, while famous in the West, Simu Liu and Awkafina aren't familiar faces to many Chinese mainlanders. This actor Simu Liu also claims to be the first Asian hero ever and disregarding the other previous Chinese actors like Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Chow Yun Fatt, Tony Leung, Donnie Yen, and so on. Video:youtu.be/qomtBkjKOmI
    7
  4493. China's adult literacy rate is 99%. USA's adult literacy rate is 79%.
    7
  4494.  @putianren  I sincerely hope for his sake that Cyrus isn't following down the path of serpentza and c-milk. You said: "So don't be disappointed, after all, he is an American !!" Well, Brian Berletic is an American too, so are you going to be disappointed with him too?
    7
  4495. 老实说翻墙之后就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    7
  4496. Agreed. Here's video of Jimmy Kimmel show asking random Americans on the street "Can you name a country? Any country?" youtu.be/kRh1zXFKC_o
    7
  4497. Hong Kong policemen are already arresting those Hong Kong troublemakers and putting them behind bars on charges of rioting.
    7
  4498.  @daledykes9253  In China, the government's approach is to save lives at the expense of businesses Whereas the United State's approach is to save businesses at the expense of lives.
    7
  4499.  @rabournm  "神州 Shenzhou I wonder how many of your ancestors starved to death or caught a bullet thanks to Mao." China was in Civil War at that time, of course Chinese were killing Chinese. Just like during the American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans. Or Koreans during Korean War, or Vietnamese during Vietnam War, or any civil war for that matter. Starvation was commonplace even during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period, such as the 1920–1921 Northern Chinese Famine, 1928–1930 Northern China Famine, 1936–1937 Sichuan Gansu Famine, 1942–1943 Henan Famine, all while under Nationalist KMT rule. It's actually thanks to Mao Zedong who put an end to the Civil War in the mainland, and finally in reunifying our divided country. This reunification of China is a herculean task that has often been underappreciated in Western discourse, if not for Chairman Mao, China would most likely still be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    7
  4500.  @sagan08  Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by the rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china) which were in great demand throughout the ancient world. Take Han Chinese traditional clothing Hanfu (汉服) for example and it has 5,000 years of history and even the Japanese Kimono and Korean Hanbok clothing have their origins in Chinese Hanfu. Video: Beautiful Traditional Costume: Han Chinese Clothing (Hanfu) youtu.be/T6CucJxiWec?t=5
    7
  4501. Democracy is (generally) a good thing, but it's difficult because it can devolve into outright populism. Politics should be about doing what's right, not what's popular. Sometimes, the popular thing may not be right, and the right thing may not be popular.
    7
  4502.  GEO NEO  Because USA joined Olympics earlier than China, so they had more time to gather more gold medals
    7
  4503. ​ @Marvee78  Totalitarianism/dictatorship has been negatively politicized in Western media, but it just means power being exercised in the name of something. For example, a People's Democratic Dictatorship means that no matter what happens, in the end has to bow down to the wishes of the people. This is in contrast to a "dictatorship of the bourgeoisie" in which no matter who the people vote into power, or think that they have democracy, whatever happens still has to bow down to the wishes of the 1%.
    7
  4504. Birol Güger: "Look at China, look at Russia, they are just issuing statements, they are just condemning, but the real thing is action. We should see something in practice." ... Meanwhile, Turkey continues to allow oil to pass through its territory into Israel.
    7
  4505. It's no secret that over the past few years, the U.S is in decline and China is rising. Many economists firmly believe that China's economy is expected to someday surpass the United State's economy someday in the foreseeable future, but the U.S doesn't want this, so it's stirring up trouble (in Hong Kong, Xinjiang, Taiwan, etc) in hopes of dragging mainland China into a pointless war to slow its growth. There's a limited window (probably 2025-2028) for the US to do this. China must remain patient and not get pointlessly sucked into a conflict with USA. As long as peace prevails, China will eventually cross this dangerous threshold by then the U.S would have declined to the point where they are no longer able to challenge China.
    7
  4506. The USSR was an innovative technological power indeed. However, China was never a part of the USSR.
    7
  4507. The government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and halt production, close tourist attractions, impose lockdowns, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and combat the coronavirus. Now it's finally paying off that the coronavirus is under control and China is slowly reopening. But in Western countries like US and UK, their economies are far too precious to sacrifice so human health has to be sacrificed instead. Donald Trump wants to reopen the economy by Easter and Boris Johnson is relying on "herd immunity" to pull through. So human lives have to be sacrificed to keep the economy alive.
    7
  4508. Haidilao restaurants in China are actually learning to pay attention to presentation of food as well as entertain customers during waiting times, as part of its service.
    7
  4509. Prof Zhang Weiwei describes China's government as a combination of "Selection + Election" Selection: Competent politicians are selected through trials, tests, exams and promoted accordingly. This meritocratic system is derived from the ancient Chinese Imperial Exam system. Election: Not only must politicians be smart, but they have to garner the approval of their peers (i.e other CPC members) and get elected. This democratic system is adopted from the West.
    7
  4510. Capitalism is to blame for the unequal distribution of Covid-19 vaccines. Because we live in a capitalistic world, the developed countries can buy up and hoard the Covid-19 vaccines, leaving little to none for the developing countries. Communism is the belief that scarce resources should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs (German: Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen)" If we been living in a truly communist world instead of capitalist, then the vaccines would be distributed according to needs, under the principles of Marxist thinking.
    7
  4511.  @MarkYeung1  Even New York Governor Andrew Cuomo thanked the Chinese government for donating 1,000 ventilators to New York. Video: Chinese donate 1,000 ventilators to U.S., says New York governor youtu.be/x_D5Ggj69Rw
    7
  4512.  @Thundercnut  What do they know that I don't? I'm sure we all know who's really behind Nordstream. It's obvious.
    7
  4513. Look at prosperous Shenzhen in the mainland, just across from Hong Kong and Shenzhen's GDP growth surpassed even Hong Kong and Singapore. Source: Shenzhen surpasses US$338 billion GDP mark in 2017, beats Hong Kong and Singapore’s growth scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2128310/shenzhen-88-cent-hi-tech-growth-roll-hit-y2tr-2017 And this is in spite of Shenzhen being under authoritarian Communist Party rule, while Hong Kong has its own separate HK government different from the mainland.
    7
  4514.  Steve Bingham  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    7
  4515.  @lucvader_1  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it appears that the U.S is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    7
  4516.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  "神州 Shenzhou those papers rely upon Brautigam's work." Do you have evidence of your claims? The report published by Chatham House, debunks China's debt trap diplomacy as a myth. _Take Sri Lanka’s Hambantota Port. It is portrayed as the case par excellence for China’s debt-trap diplomacy. The conventional account is that China lent money to Sri Lanka to build the port, knowing that Colombo would experience debt distress and Beijing could then seize it in exchange for debt relief, permitting its use by China’s navy. This narrative is simply incorrect. The project was proposed by former Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa, not Beijing, as part of his government’s corrupt and unsustainable development program. _ ... Source: Debunking the myth of China’s “debt-trap diplomacy”
    7
  4517. Indeed. At this stage in time, the West can't afford to fight on two fronts over Ukraine and Taiwan island, as well as inflation at home due to rising gas and food prices, etc.
    7
  4518. Japanese forces have no one but themselves to blame if they commit atrocities like Rape of Nanjing, Unit 731, comfort women issue, and other atrocities. Nobody force them to commit those atrocities, and had they treated the captured territories better, they may have gotten a better reception instead.
    7
  4519.  @intothewrx  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    7
  4520.  @HarrySmith-hr2iv  "From 1700 onwards The British traded with both Indian Iman Islam states and Indian Hindu Raj states. Hence their economic success." In the 1700s, India's share of the world economy when the British first arrived on its shores was around 23%. By the time the British left, it was down to below 4%. Why? Because India had been governed for the benefit of Britain. Britain rise for 200 years has been financed by its depredations in India. The Industrial Revolution in Britain was actually premised on the de-industrialization of India. For example, India's local weaver industries had been dismantled and the raw materials shipped to Britain, so that manufactured cloth could be sold back to India from Britain. Video: Dr Shashi Tharoor MP - Britain Does Owe Reparations https://youtu.be/f7CW7S0zxv4
    7
  4521. Agreed. The "women hold up half the sky" (妇女能顶半边天) quote was made famous by Mao Zedong.
    7
  4522.  @namelesssnitchy  I've met many anti-China people who always use the same old excuse of "I'm not anti-China, I'm just anti-CPC" to defend themselves and justify their anti-China stance. But why are you against the very government that transform China from a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy today, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure? Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any formal declaration of independence then Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    7
  4523.  @MarkYeung1  This former U.S ambassador to China doesn't even understand the Chinese language himself. In fact, neither does the current U.S ambassador to China understand Chinese. No wonder why U.S is unable to formulate good policies towards China.
    7
  4524.  @item6931  Those "tech transfers" were initiated by the Chinese government. Foreign companies only agreed to transfer technology as part of the terms and conditions of setting up shop in China (or they agree to partner with local Chinese firms). So shouldn't thanks should be given to Chinese government for their policies?
    7
  4525.  Snehasish Ghosh  Look, Britain was colonial superpower during 19th century but was eventually overtaken by USA in 20th century. But prior to that, China (and also India) had been economic superpower for 1800 years and we made up 25% of the world's GDP share, according to world leading British economist, Angus Maddison. Source: Global distribution of GDP among China, India, Western Europe, USA, Middle East from 1 AD to 2003 AD wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA_Middle_East.png And judging from the above trend, it looks as though China is all set to dominate the 21st century.
    7
  4526. +Soul Chicken Nobody cares about China's interests except Chinese. Nobody wants to see China succeed, except Chinese. Nobody can defend China, except Chinese. Modern China was built by sweat, blood, tears and sacrifice of the Chinese people to through wars, invasion, famine, poverty, rebellions and revolutions. There were many failures and mistakes along the way, but Chinese people turned China from dirt poor, war torn and starving country, into world's 2nd largest economy, protected by world's 2nd largest military spending and largest land army, the PLA. If you want to label Chinese people who defend China as "trolls" then aren't you implying that Indians who defend their country are trolls as well? Under the Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil was poor and the serfs had to work to grow enough food to feed the population and the 5% elites. Starvation was commonplace, and criminals were punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There is this Tibetans drum called damaru which consists of two human skulls and the drumskin is made from human skin and the drumstick from human bone. When Tibet returned to Chinese rule, it was modernized and roads, schools, universities, hospitals were built, as well as running water, gas and electricity. Tibetans today have access to cars, mobile phones, computers and there is Internet coverage, WiFi, and mobile phone reception, even in such a remote location like Tibet. The population of Tibet has grown from about 1 million in 1951 to 3 million people today, as food can now be imported from the mainland. What makes you think Tibetans will absolutely rise up against China then? Have you been to Tibet and asked the locals? Today, Tibet has a thriving tourist industry, because China built Qinghai railway through difficult mountainous terrain to connect the normally isolated Tibet to the rest of the world.
    7
  4527. Children react with emotion, when things do not go the way they want. Adults react with logic, and come up with multiple plans to deal with unexpected situations.
    7
  4528. planetzito That still doesn't change the fact Japanese and Korean automakers did copy from Western car companies. And it was adlerzwei who first brought up Japan and South Korea into this discussion.
    7
  4529. The world benefits if there is friendly U.S-China relations. If U.S-China relations deteriorate, then the world suffers.
    7
  4530. Singapore's system shares many similarities with China's. For example, Singapore has been under one-party PAP rule for its entire life (59 years) much like People's Republic of China under the CPC for 75 years. Yet such systems have proven to be long-lasting.
    7
  4531. Mike Pence said China, the world's 2nd largest economy, was built by trade deficit with the USA? Then USA, the world's largest economy was built by whom? Built upon the backs of African slavery? Genocide of Native Americans? Occupation of their lands even till today?
    7
  4532.  @Alpha1598753  BRICS is NOT the USSR. Unlike the USSR, BRICS is not characterized by collective decision-making nor the practice of overtly endorsing of each other’s foreign policies. At its core, BRICS is a coalition oriented towards fostering mutually beneficial partnerships, primarily within the realms of the economy and trade. BRICS also maintains a strong commitment to non-interference in each other’s domestic affairs. In short, BRICS is quite possibly a "microcosm" of what a multipolar world should look like.
    7
  4533. It's a pity that ASEAN itself still refuses to recognize Myanmar government, even though ASEAN claims to not interfere in its member's internal affairs.
    7
  4534. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    7
  4535.  @bartonlee3594  Ukraine was historically ruled by a variety of external powers, including the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, the Austrian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Tsardom of Russia, and of course, the Soviet Union. Even the name Ukraine comes from the old Slavic term for "borderland".
    7
  4536.  @christopherhamlin6139  You said: "I am well aware of the animosity between Vietnam and China." China literally helped the Vietnamese fight for independence from the French. During the First Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons, ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla force with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help the Vietnamese fight for independence. From 1950 to 1954 the Chinese government shipped goods, materials, and medicine worth $43 billion (in 2019 dollars) to Vietnam. From 1950 to 1956 the Chinese government shipped 155,000 small arms, 58 million rounds of ammunition, 4,630 artillery pieces, 1,080,000 artillery shells, 840,000 hand grenades, 1,400,000 uniforms, 1,200 vehicles, 14,000 tons of food, and 26,000 tons of fuel to Vietnam. ... Source: Wikipedia: First Indochina War Yet some Vietnamese nationalists conveniently forgotten Chinese aid given to them, and even worsts, some claim they've won their independence from the French all on their own.
    7
  4537. Devilion901 At least China can always manufacture more tanks, fighters, ammunition and equipment during wartime to replace losses. But India has to rely on purchasing more military equipment and ammunition from countries like USA and Russia, and these countries may suddenly decide to increase the prices of their military wares, because they know India is dependent on them during wartime.
    7
  4538.  @norvikgrigorian4518  "Is China a democratic country? Let me know!" There are many ways to define democracy. One such definition is a government of the people, by the people, for the people. In this sense, the US is not a democracy, because the U.S government just isn't able to deliver what the people want. On the other hand, China's government is able to deliver what the people want, so in a sense, isn't China more democratic?
    7
  4539. NED represents America's Need for Exerting Dominance on other countries.
    7
  4540.  @theworldsbroken  Because the debt trap has already been debunked by experts. Look it up.
    7
  4541. In China, the Chinese government controls the Chinese corporations for China's benefit, reining in companies when they gone too far. In the United States however, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    7
  4542.  @ShuCarolina  Firstly, the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 was founded in 1949 by Chairman Mao, but Chinese civilization as a whole have been ongoing for 5,000 years of history. Other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Egypt, Rome, etc, have since succumbed to history, while China has survived the violent passage of history to modern times relatively intact. Secondly, even the "foreign rulers" of China had given up their traditions and adopted Han culture during their reign of China. For example, Kublai Khan (grandson of Genghis Khan) had choose to give up his nomadic ways and adopt Han culture, proclaiming himself Emperor of Yuan Dynasty China, and slept under a permanent roof in the Imperial Palace. His grandfather, Genghis Khan purportedly never slept under a permanent roof like a true Mongolian nomad. Same goes for the Manchu conquerors of China, they eventually assimilated into Han culture. Thirdly, China's history has shown that a strong central government (i.e an Emperor and the Imperial Court) has been the backbone of Chinese civilization, yet why is it so anathema for you to even consider China continuing this system of governance? When such a system has proved immensely successful for China?
    7
  4543. At 7:13 Chinese govt: bad, Chinese company: bad Chinese products: bad Chinese apps: bad Chinese vaccine: bad …… In other words they hate China.
    7
  4544.  @KlKl-k4x  American "protection" in Singapore is basically allowing the island to be used as a unsinkable aircraft carrier (like what Pepe Escobar said). The US 7th Fleet is based in Singapore, and they use Singapore as a launch point to send aircraft carriers to the South China Sea.
    7
  4545.  @MarkYeung1  China is literally the largest producer of Holy Bibles in the world. The Amity Printing Company (APC, Chinese: 爱德印刷有限公司) in Nanjing is the largest producer of Bibles with the capacity to print 20 million Bibles each year. Its Bibles are also exported to more than 70 countries and printed in 90 languages.
    7
  4546. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty China and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history.
    7
  4547. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑  Here's a map of Yuan Dynasty China (images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/04/yuan.jpg ) and Tibet was clearly part of China during Yuan Dynasty.
    7
  4548.  @Sean-giang  I think what you meant was China's Olympics team in bringing in all those medals.
    7
  4549.  @everythingandmore5537  About 5 year elections, China has made 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, to map out China's direction and future in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more.
    7
  4550.  @everythingandmore5537  "The CCP will arrest you if found using YouTube." Which person in China has been arrested just for login into YouTube while in China?
    7
  4551.  @sayaandyangsaya2756  For the USA to change their attitude, they need to first acknowledge that America is in decline and China is rising. They need to accept the idea that a non-Western, non-liberal democratic country like China is going to surpass the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future. It's inevitable. But such an idea is too frightening for many Americans to fathom.
    7
  4552. Except when Daniel Davis talks about the Chinese weather balloon.
    7
  4553.  @ne0ge049  In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, reining in companies when they gone too far. Whereas in the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    7
  4554.  @MarkYeung1  China is separated from the United States by the Pacific Ocean. Ukraine is right on Russia's border and they're killing ethnic Russians, and Putin's diplomatic attempts to get parties to adhere to the Minsk agreement fell on deaf ears. So Putin decided to act instead.
    7
  4555. Previously, when China was dirt-poor country, many overseas Chinese grown up feeling ashamed about their homeland. But now that China has risen, Chinese have much to be proud of our home land.
    7
  4556. Trump's tarriffs won't last forever. Eventually, even President Trump will have to step down as president once his term limits are over, and the next US president might just reverse Trump's policies and lift the US-China trade war, thus possibly resulting in future economic boom for China and US-China trade relations resume their previous pre-tradewar levels. Who knows?
    7
  4557. Wuhan 武汉, Wu as as martial artists 武林高手 and Han as in strong and manly 男子汉
    7
  4558.  @INTJ791  So even though the Spratly Islands were not part of Philippine territory (as per the 1898 Treaty of Paris), the Philippines is suddenly entitled to claim the Spratlys (which was historically Chinese territory) because of UNCLOS?
    7
  4559.  @richard35791  You might as well mention that the United States claiming Hawaii and Guam (which are located so far away from the American continent) as part of their territory is absurd. Much like how the Falkland Islands are located closer to South America, yet they are considered British territory. But the fact remains that Spratly islands weren't part of Philippines as per the 1898 Treaty of Paris, and just because of UNCLOS, that Phillipine gets to claim the Spratly which is historically part of Chinese territory.
    7
  4560.  @singlelegmsta8159  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    7
  4561.  @grahamlyons8522  I think reparations from Taiwan are probably unnecessary at this point, because ultimately the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 considers Taiwan as part of China (much like ROC 🇹🇼 does). I'm just trying to get it out there that after 1949, Taiwan had an injection of capital (in the form of gold reserves) to kick start their industrialization under the KMT, while the mainland was left ravaged by invasion and civil strife.
    7
  4562. USA is actually the most protectionist country in the world, with over 800 of such protectionist measures, compared to China's 200-300 of such measures, at least since 2008.
    7
  4563. Agreed. Taiwan's chip making requires enormous amounts of water, even a drought in Taiwan caused TMSC chip manufacturing to slow to a crawl. Yet the US is relocating those wafer fabrication plants to arid Arizona of all places?
    7
  4564.  @stunningandbrave2520  You said: "The West never "needed" China before Deng Xiaoping, definitely don't want it now that it is a warmongering, full-on dictatorship" China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last conflict in 1979, how is China different today than it was under Deng Xiaoping? Also, China during Deng Xiaoping era was still under the authoritarian rule of the Communist Party of China, so what difference does it make?
    7
  4565.  @stanspb763  Agreed. Russia's prioritize the stability of its economy first, and even Elvira Nabiullina (Head of the Central Bank of Russia) was surprised that Russia was able to weather the EU sanctions.
    7
  4566. China has settled boundary dispute approximately of 20,000 km with 12 countries out of the 22,000 km and is yet to settle about 2,000 km of boundary involving India and Bhutan. -In 1961, Nepal and China signed border agreement. -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1991, USSR and China signed Sino-Soviet border agreement. -In 1992, Laos and China signed border agreement. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border agreement. China has 21 talks with Bhutan and 19 talks with India but still fail to settle our countries borders.
    7
  4567.  @yfelwulf  Lithium batteries have raised concerns over their environmental friendliness, so Chinese companies are investing in Sodium Solid-State batteries, which holds promise for its longer life span, increase range and faster charging rates compared to lithium batteries. Sodium is also more environmentally friendly than Lithium and is also cheaper as well, making electric cars more affordable to the masses.
    7
  4568.  @michaelbotha9500  You said: "should your Chinese EV burn down a parking lot etc." Studies have shown that gasoline cars actually catch fire more often than electric cars. In 2018, there were only 0.1 fires per billion miles travelled by EVs, compared to 0.2 fires per billion miles traveled by gasoline cars, according to a report by the U.S National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
    7
  4569. Actually, China invited Taiwan to join the One-China, Two-System policy, to officially recognize Taiwan as part of China, but allow Taiwan to keep its own government like Hong Kong. But Taiwan has rejected it and made no counterproposal of its own.
    7
  4570. Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors (just ask the expats here). However, many Westerners are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands with suspicion.
    7
  4571.  @slovackoinfo  "神州 Shenzhou If China had a skilled workforce, why was it cheap and why didn't it produce anything of quality." That's because Western companies did not allow them to. Western companies were trying to shrink worker wages in order to skim off a larger profit margin for themselves. Those poor Made-in-China products were the result of decisions made by Western companies that set up shop here in China.
    7
  4572.  @slovackoinfo  You clearly said 30 years ago, that would be 1990s, and Nike opened its first factory in Mainland China in 1981. So clearly, China had exported products like sneakers to the rest of the world 30 years ago. You said: "I was not talking about saving money, but about the fact that the West developed China." Then why'd you bring up "Tell me what China produced and sold to the world 30 years ago."? Westerners saved money because China was producing and selling goods like sneakers to the West 30 years ago, so why do you talk about outside China when what you meant was development inside China? Also, it wasn't the West that developed China like I said earlier, they set up shop in China because of China's cheap, skilled labor as well as the promise of an enormous market in which to sell their finished goods. Didn't I already answer your question earlier?
    7
  4573. What about US President Trump following the similar path as Hitler then? USA is invading Middle East countries and cutting off the country's heads (Muammar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, etc) and then installing their own US puppets in place. Now USA is targeting Syria and the Assad Regime is next on the list here. But China is currently not at war with any country since our last war in 1979, and we are building infrastructure in less developed countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and also African countries like Kenya, Nigeria, Angola, etc. But USA is involved in wars even in the 21st century here.
    7
  4574. Such an Upright, Honorable and Courageous person hasn't yet appeared in the United States. I can't think of anyone that fulfills this requirements and still want to go into politics. Even so, he or she will have to face huge obstacles to getting elected as POTUS.
    7
  4575. They may suck at this stage maybe. But battery technology is only going to improve in the coming years, so one day in the future, EVs would be far more attractive.
    7
  4576.  @onalos1271  In 2022, it was Ukraine. In 2023, it's now Palestine. Makes me wonder what 2024 has in store next. Hopefully not Taiwan.
    7
  4577.  @saltyapostle44  It doesn't have to be that way. The U.S sees every transaction as a zero sum game, whereas China sees things differently and strives towards attaining mutual prosperity. Also, according to Kishore Mahbubani, the standard of living of the the bottom 50% of lower income groups in America has been virtually unchanged for 40 years, so the issue in America is that the 1% control the 99%.
    7
  4578.  @saltyapostle44  China's home ownership rate more than 90% in 2017 (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Yi and Huang 2014; Clark et al. 2019). China now is one of the countries with the highest rate of homeownership in the world. Multiple home ownership is also rising rapidly, reaching 20% and higher than many developed nations (Huang and Yi 2011; Huang et al. 2020). This rapid and pervasive change is particularly impressive and in sharp contrast to the recent decline in homeownership and the emergence of “generation rent” in the West (Forrest et al. 2012; Clark 2019; Richard 2018).
    7
  4579.  @linus5045  You said: "China until now didnt do a damn thing for the other countries it only cares for its own economie." What are you saying? China has help build infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, etc in countries that signed up to the Belt and Road Initiative, yet you claim China did nothing? China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game. You said: "Wont China dominate the BRICS just like USA? What even is the BRICS without China?" China didn't dominate this summit in Kazan, it was Russia that was the main focus of attention. Also, had China insisted on doing everything its way, then India and China won't have reached a deal regarding the border dispute. Like I said, China seeks win-win cooperation, while US sees everything as a zero sum game.
    7
  4580. @Rob Hunter Meanwhile, the USA is out of control.
    7
  4581.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Can you everyone here why so many people are leaving?" During the 2019 Hong Kong riots, there were people throwing bricks, breaking shop windows, vandalising public property, throwing molotov cocktails and the culprits fear reprisal for their actions, so that's the reason why they flee elsewhere.
    7
  4582.  @MarkYeung1  The Hong Kong rioters come from all walks of life, from banking to education. Especially the Hong Kong teachers, many of them have been riling up young students to go out and riot, creating havoc during the 2019 Hong Kong riots, and they now fear reprisal for their actions, which is why they fled.
    7
  4583.  @MarkYeung1  "Why don't you come to Hong Kong and take a look?" Peace and stability has finally returned to Hong Kong after nearly a year of riots, and Hong Kong's economy expanded by 6.4 percent in 2022. According to the IMF, Hong Kong's real GDP is forecasted to grow by 3.5 and 3.1 percent in 2023 and 2024, respectively. Mainland China's reopening is also expected to boost Hong Kong's economic growth.
    7
  4584. LOL, why should the government pay money to rioters? You think democracy is best ideological system is that it? Look at the world's largest democracy and the number of riots they have. They'll go bankrupt if they have to pay compensation money to every rioter. Source: List of riots in India wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_riots_in_India It is fortunate China did not adopt democracy like them isn't it?
    7
  4585. No need to disregard patents, because China actually applies for more patents in the world than any other, as well as being the country with the most granted patents.
    7
  4586.  @MylesStandoffish  "It's suspicious because it's such a rapid improvement and not built over decades of development." Pan Zhanle didn't come out of nowhere. Pan won Gold in 2024 Doha World Championships in 100m freestyle, 4x100m freestyle, 4x200m freestyle, 4x100m mixed freestyle and also Silver in 2023 Fukuoka 4x100m medley. Pan also won Gold in 2022 Hangzhou Asian Games in 100m freestyle, 4x100m freestyle relay, 4x100m medley relay, and Silver in 200m freestyle, 400m freestyle, 4x200m freestyle relay, etc. "That doesn't happen without assistance from a needle. Sorry, it's just being honest." Clearly you're not being honest, you refuse to look up Pan Zhanle's accolades in other sporting events, before suddenly proclaiming that this is not possible without doping.
    7
  4587.  @ysw8291  Even wolves still work together in packs, but the U.S is like some dire wolf that has no qualms about putting its own interest ahead of its "pack members"
    7
  4588. Hong Kong would be better served under the mainland communist government. Back in 1980s, Shenzhen was undeveloped wetland village, while Hong Kong had skyscrapers. Fast forward to today and Shenzhen is a technological mecca, home to the latest technologies, smartphones, gadgets, cameras, drones, robotics, automation, Artificial Intelligence systems, 5G, etc. Whereas Hong Kong has stagnated under Western brand of democracy.
    7
  4589. "Do not worry if others do not understand you. Instead, worry if you do not understand others." - Confucius
    7
  4590.  @zetristan4525 🐖🔙
    7
  4591. US Navy can't even protect cargo vessels passing through the Red Sea.
    7
  4592.  @Esquera123  Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past. Back then, nobody in the West expected China to succeed, our country was embroiled in civil war, with the various Chinese provinces ruled by individual warlords, while the ordinary people suffered. It was Mao Zedong that succeeded in the herculean task and reunifying our divided country, where the previous KMT administration failed for 37 years, during the Republic of China (1912-1939) era. The KMT lost the mainland to the CPC and fled to Taiwan island where they plan to someday retake the mainland in the future. Fast forward till today and the People's Republic of China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (or world's largest if measured by GDP PPP), the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Chinese government. It's a truly unprecedented miracle in history.
    7
  4593.  @vitaliibraslavets  About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    7
  4594. + Debabrata Choudhury Why not India and Pakistan mend their relations then? Solve everyone's problem.
    7
  4595.  @eleinaedelweiss6215  But you earlier comment claimed that the CPC's policies can end up with just another Mao Zedong, when Singapore also has those policies and that for all the good he did, Lee Kuan Yew was a dictator too. So why the seemingly double standards here?
    7
  4596. People in Taiwan too afraid to wear Hanfu 汉服 because it might be taken as sign of being pro-mainland. They want to divorce their traditional Chinese culture.
    7
  4597.  @MarkYeung1  China has landed on the far side of the Moon, a feat that the U.S hasn't even achieved.
    7
  4598. I feel bad for the other 5 Eyes countries i.e Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand, for just blindly hopping onboard the boycott wagon after the Biden Administration announced it was diplomatically boycotting the 2022 Beijing Olympics. The USA is literally taking the other 5 Eyes countries for a ride, and is now U.S has hopped off the boycott wagon.
    7
  4599.  @Andy-P  "MarkYeung1 Taiwan isn't part of China." Go and read Taiwan's constitution and it says that the island is part of China. Even the US Secretary of State Blinken reiterated the US position on the One China policy, (that the US does not support Taiwanese independence).
    7
  4600.  @barryford1482  Because Chinese in Canberra are subject to the same anti-China Australian media, that's why they don't have support for the government in China. One Chinese lecturer in Canberra University lecturing about communism is just his own opinion that's all. A Chinese couple dealing with computers in Canberra are also subject to the same anti-China Australian media and they don't represent the rest of China. I mean, these are overseas Chinese living in Australia, how's that representative of how actual Chinese living in China feel about the government? Furthermore, you quoted anecdotal evidence from Chinese in Australia, whereas I quoted a Harvard University survey revealing at least 80-90% of Chinese citizens supporting the CPC.
    7
  4601.  @currentchannel3452  Cyrus is promoting his peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" then isn't that a positive thing for the world? U.S-China relations have deteriorated to their lowest point in months, and a potential hot war would not only be deleterious for both our countries, but for the rest of the world as well, so promoting the alternative message of war is simply unthinkable.
    7
  4602.  @peorakef  Taiwan is part of China and had more time to react to the outbreak, whereas mainland China had less time to react (plus mainland China has larger population than Taiwan)
    7
  4603.  @tubbytuber  China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's direction and future in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of abolishing term limits. Whereas in the USA for example, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short-term plans for America's future, instead of long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of presidential term limits.
    7
  4604.  @redwine2664  True, Canada has some of the most expensive real estate in the world. Al could potentially make it easier for Canadians to find the best value for money real estate in Canada.
    7
  4605.  @MarkYeung1  Being an astronaut may have lost its glamor in the US and UK, but that's certainly not true in China. I already gave you the statistic that more than half (56 percent) of 8 to 12-year-olds saying that they would most like to become an astronaut when they grow up. Previously, there was no chance to be Chinese astronaut (which we call Taikonauts, named after Taikong 太空 "Space") because of the Wolf Amendment by the US, forbidding NASA from collaborating with Chinese scientists on space projects. This meant that Chinese scientists are barred from working on board the International Space Station. The question is why call it International when Chinese aren't allowed to participate in it? In response, China built our very own space station Tiangong (天宫 "Heavenly Palace") that's of innovative design and comes with advanced features not seen in the ISS. Clearly, China's Taikonaut phase is only just beginning!
    7
  4606.  @MarkYeung1  In 2013, a Chinese teacher on board the Tiangong space station conducted a "space lecture" to 60 million Chinese school children on the ground, demonstrating the effects of zero gravity on objects in the space station. You can already imagine many Chinese children being inspired to become Taikonauts themselves from this lecture.
    7
  4607.  @-JustHuman-  You said: "even though we that is totally a lie, as just in Wuhan the count was higher. As we can see with the crematoriums running 24/7, and the trucks when they came in with the urns for the families." How does crematoriums running 24/7 and trucks full of urns, act as evidence that China is lying about the death count from Covid-19? Crematoriums cremate people who died of all sorts of other causes, not just Covid-19, so how do you prove that China is lying about death count, just from crematoriums running 24/7 and truckloads of urns?
    7
  4608.  @joshkooga7204  Every country should find a governing system that best suits their particular set of culture and history. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    7
  4609. For your information, China's digital Renminbi doesn't require access to the Internet to be used for transactions. You can travel to the rural countryside in China and buy some fruits from local farmers using digital RMB without connecting to the Internet.
    7
  4610. I used to watch serpentza's earlier videos about China, showing both the positive and negative aspects of China in a balanced manner. However, he changed over the years and serpentza's latest videos about China have been largely negative in nature.
    7
  4611. Opiniones de JACC's Opinions Actually, Tibetan government signed an agreement (Seventeen Point Agreement) back in 1951, acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Today, countries all over the world, including USA, UK, France, Russia, etc, have accepted Chinese sovereignty over Tibet as whenever you draw the modern map of PRC, Tibet is always part of China. Even in uploader's video, Tibet is part of China.
    7
  4612.  @dinesh50448  India actually ranks among the world's most racist countries according an international survey. The way you resort to racially attacking my eyes as small, just because I'm Chinese, seems to support the data.
    7
  4613.  @jacwi8719  You said: "You can speak as bad as you want in the US about US government, and you'll still be fine, dude. But try that in China, and you'll be dead." I tried what you said, I spoke as badly about the US government as possible while in China and I'm still alive. Many of the local people even agreed with my criticism about the US government, so why do you claim I'll be dead if I try that in China?
    7
  4614.  @jacwi8719  You said: "Is it wrong for America to protect their market and jobs from foreign companies invasion dude?" No, I don't believe that. But Americans themselves believe in a free market system, yet by doing this, it's going against its principles. Global economy is like a wild untamed river. Would you allow the river to flow uncontrollably, flooding your markets with Chinese goods and destroying your local businesses, while big corporations leave USA and set up shop in lower labour cost countries like China and Vietnam, leaving your workers high and dry? Because that what happens in a free economy. Whereas China's approach is to "tame the river" and control it's flow to maximise the benefits to China. Local fledgling Chinese companies would perish if exposed directly to foreign competition, so the government grants a home advantage to local Chinese companies. At least until they become strong enough to venture outside of China to markets elsewhere.
    7
  4615.  @abbotsful  Here's a chart of Search Engine Market Share in China from 2009 - 2020 youtu.be/X92gTccwkoo and Google was initially in the lead but lost the majority market share to Baidu in the end.
    7
  4616.  @Legacy241  China doesn't want war, but that doesn't mean China is afraid of war. The United States is constantly stirring up anti-China sentiment, "demonising China", starting trade war, tech war with China, and painting our country as the enemy, then don't be surprised if Chinese people finally have enough and start treating the USA like one as well.
    7
  4617.  @zackk4969  China never imposed our political system on Vietnam, North Korea, Cambodia, and others. The Vietnamese communist revolutionary Hồ Chí Minh fought for Vietnam's independence and North Korean Leader, Kim Il-sung was elected by the Soviet Union.
    7
  4618. It's a Seafood Market in Wuhan, selling live seafood like shrimps, crawfish, eels, shellfish, etc. Even Japanese and Korean Markets sell live seafood too.
    7
  4619. You know what they say about the best defense...
    7
  4620. The closest USA ever claim to an existential threat is the 1962 Cuban Missile crisis, but other than that, the American mainland has never been put in any dangerous military situation that would alarm it's populace. Even the Vietnam War and Korean War were fought by Americans on foreign soil across the Pacific Ocean on the other side of the world.
    7
  4621.  @ashokjain8449  About Education in China, the Chinese government is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's highest R&D spending according to the following source: Countries by Research and Development spending 1. China ($553.4 billion) 2. United States ($511.1 billion) 3. European Union ($379.0 billion) 4. Japan ($165.7 billion) 5. Germany ($118.8 billion) 6. South Korea ($91.6 billion) 7. India ($66.5 billion) 8. France ($60.0 billion) 9. United Kingdom ($44.8 billion) 10. Russia ($42.6 billion) ... Source: List of countries by research and development spending wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending#List In the West, researchers often have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    7
  4622.  @ashokjain8449  You said: "It is difficult to make them see the real point of China's denial of accepted rules of international engagement. They don't respect any rule based order by not agreeing to treaties, contracts, IPRs, history or traditions. They claim anything and anybody that suit them. Just how on earth you can claim vast areas of sea as yours denying so many others their share of common gifts of nature?" Now you're just making sweeping claims about China not agreeing to treaties. China is party to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) whereas countries like the United States don't even ratify UNCLOS, yet they are claiming Freedom of Navigation with regards to UNCLOS. As for claiming vast areas of sea, China does not claim the seas itself, only the islands within it. China first claimed South China Sea Islands in 1947 when the Republic of China 🇹🇼 published the 11th Dash Line (of which the 9-Dash Line is based upon). Back then no one complained about China's claims, not Vietnam, not Philippines, not even USA. The North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    7
  4623.  @monicale8137  But have you lived in China before? China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    7
  4624.  @ashokjain8449  But you specifically said (and I quote your words): "If China is so rule abiding why it isn't following the ICJ rulings on the South China Sea." But what ICJ ruling are you talking about? The arbitration tribunal was clearly Not the International Court of Justice (ICJ) it was the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) that shared the same office at the Hague as the ICJ that's all and PCA isn't even an official UN agency like the ICJ. Since the arbitration ruling was made by non-UN agency like the PCA, then China clearly reserves the right not to adhere to that ruling.
    7
  4625.  @tjena5772  The South China Sea arbitration tribunal is the Permanent Court of Arbitration which is a non-UN agency unlike the International Court of Justice, so once again, China reserves the right not to adhere to it's ruling. The PCA only share the same office in Hague as the ICJ, but the two organisations are unrelated. Source: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1989486/united-nations-stresses-separation-hague-tribunal
    7
  4626.  @j8dailo  Yes, @Ashok Jain pretends to like China, but claims "China created the virus and exported it to the world" or "China is the enemy of mankind" or "Chinese people need rescuing". It's clear that @Ashok Jain doesn't want to see China succeed that's all.
    7
  4627.  @ashokjain8449  About acquiring land, China is reclaiming territory that was originally part of Chinese history. Just like India can claim Goa, Tripura, Manipur, Sikkim, Nagaland, Jammu & Kashmir etc as part of their historical territory, then why can't China claim territory that was originally part of Chinese history? About acquiring minerals and resources China is a growing country, we need access to natural resources to fuel our growth. China is purchasing resources from African countries as well as building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports and so on.
    7
  4628.  @tjena5772  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. All verified eyewitness present in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    7
  4629.  @ashokjain8449  Besides IPRs, China publishes more research papers than any other country in the world, over a wide range of topics such as physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences. Countries by published scientific papers in 2016: 1. China (426,165 articles) 2. United States (408,985 articles) 3. India (110,320 articles) 4. Germany (103,122 articles) 5. United Kingdom (97,527 articles) ... Source: List of countries by number of scientific and technical journal articles wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_scientific_and_technical_journal_articles This shows that many Chinese scientist and researchers are making discoveries and publishing their findings, contributing to mankind's scientific advancements.
    7
  4630. Some former colonies still suffer from a subservient “colonial mindset”. Even when physical decolonization is complete, some of the people still need to “decolonize their minds” to heal the mental scars inflicted on the colonized by the colonizers.
    7
  4631.  @currentchannel3452  If you claim Cyrus is paid by China to promote his peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" then isn't that a positive thing for the world? U.S-China relations have deteriorated to their lowest point in months, and a potential hot war would not only be deleterious for both our countries, but for the rest of the world as well, so promoting the alternative message of war is simply unthinkable.
    7
  4632.  Moni Penny  Indeed, mainland China have made it clear that Taiwan is a red line, yet the U.S continues to press on this issue despite the warnings.
    7
  4633. What has Pakistan or Tibet got to do this this dispute at all? This is bilateral issue between Bhutan and China, which India has intervened, so how are those topics even related at all?
    7
  4634. 我们将继续努力～为中国创造更美好的未来。🇨🇳 We will continue our efforts to build a better future for China. 🇨🇳
    7
  4635.  @nickl5658  Agreed. Inside China, the digital RMB benefits foreigners living in China that don't want to set up a Chinese bank account, yet enjoy the convenience of WeChat/Alipay. Outside China, the digital RMB allows countries (especially Belt and Road Initiative countries) to purchase Chinese goods without the need to be physically present in China. It benefits any RMB transactions both inside and outside of China.
    7
  4636.  @teemuvesala9575  At present, in the face of climate change, Arizona is facing a deepening water crisis and some of the state’s all-important aquifers have an uncertain future. Arizona received just 13.6 inches of rainfall on average per year between 1970 and 2000, according to the NOAA National Climatic Data Center, making it the fourth driest state nationwide. Intel wafer fabs only survive by "religiously recycling water," which could be an additional cost factored into the pricing of its chips.
    7
  4637.  @davidlim5  The death throes of a superpower in decline are very unsightly indeed.
    7
  4638. Also, never pull off the same trick twice. People will have already seen through your first trick and develop a counterstrategy. China has been preparing for additional tariffs since Trump's first term and is responding accordingly.
    7
  4639.  @MarkYeung1  But the topic is about losing faith in the Western media credibility, not about the Chinese media, so why are you comparing apples to oranges? Just because they are both medias?
    7
  4640.  @MarkYeung1  About switching the title from "Why the New York Times want you to fear China?" to "Why the CGTN want you to hate the USA?", apart from changing NYT to CGTN and China to USA, why'd you change "fear" to "hate"? What's wrong leaving the word "fear" as it is, while the other parameters change? It's like you're just tipping the scales unfavorably towards China that's all, instead of using the same standard for comparison.
    7
  4641.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou CGTN is well known to preach hatred towards USA. Just like New York Times preaches fear towards China." That doesn't answer my question of why'd you change "fear" to "hate"? You switched NYT to CGTN and China to USA, but why change "fear" to "hate" instead of leaving the term "fear" as it is? By doing so, you are completely changing the fairness of the comparison, in order to paint China as more negative than the USA, instead of using a more objective comparison.
    7
  4642.  @keelieinwonderland  But do you feel sad that Hawaiian kids are being taught English, American history, and that their motherland is United States of America? So what's wrong Uighurs being taught Mandarin Chinese, Chinese history and that their motherland is People's Republic of China?
    7
  4643.  @smoochie3331  The U.S decoupling from China at this stage is virtually impossible.
    7
  4644. Many European countries continue to buy Russian gas in rubles, despite exerting pressure on other countries like India and China not to buy from Russia.
    7
  4645.  @zackk4969  What genocide in Xinjiang? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    7
  4646.  @zackk4969  “Diary of a Madman”.《狂人日记》 is a work of fiction by Lu Xun, then why are you confusing fiction with reality?
    7
  4647. Call it the "Global Majority" games, after the non-Western countries which form the global majority.
    7
  4648.  @chungusultimate  I employ logic in my argument as well. You keep on insisting that Israel did not intentionally harm civilians, well then have you considered that perhaps Hamas did not have such intentions as well? Why take any hostages at all, if their goal was to intentionally harm civilians? Those hostages can be exchanged for Palestinian prisoners in a prison swap exchange, so why kill when they can take hostages?
    7
  4649.  @thequantumalchemist2965  Censorship on YT is getting especially bad nowadays...
    7
  4650.  @Chris815  Russia did not start a war, they are putting an end to one that began 8 years ago, since the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukovych by the USA, and installing their own U.S puppet government into Ukraine. Since then, Ukraine has been supporting ultra-nationalist, neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion that's carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Luhansk and Donetsk. Look at the pictures of Ukrainian soldiers featured in NATO media and there's plenty of Nazi symbolism being worn as insignias by many in the Ukrainian Army.
    7
  4651.  @bjrnhjortshjandersen1286  China's High-Speed Rail network is designed to connect the wealthier Eastern port cities (i.e Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, etc) to the less developed Western Regions (i.e Tibet, Xinjiang, etc) in order to distribute China's wealth more evenly. Even though China's HSR connecting to Western regions is currently running at a loss, the benefits come in the form of passengers able to buy affordable train tickets to commute to work from their homes. Whereas in the West, their train fares are getting more expensive for everyday commuters. You said: "If 5G has difficulty finding good use in China ...how much sense will 6G make now?" 5G in still in its infancy and much of its potential remains unrealized, because of its late development. So there's still remains some time to go before 5G truly kicks off the ground. Developing 6G now makes sense, because the sooner you start the development of the technology, the sooner the technology matures out of infancy. You said: "If a country makes too many investments that do not contribute to the prosperity of the nation it just makes people poorer." Short-term investments are expected to pay off in the short run, while the benefits of long-term investments may not always be obvious right now. China is focusing on long-term investments, so while you may not always see the gains right now, after a few years or more, the investments might begin paying off in the future.
    7
  4652. China does not want war, but that does not mean China is weak. China is not afraid of war, and the PLA will defend China's sovereignty.
    7
  4653. It takes less effort for the West to fabricate fake about China, and it takes more effort for China to waste time debunking those fake news.
    7
  4654. @Sheriff Lobo China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land.
    7
  4655. @Sheriff Lobo Countries Ranked by Agricultural Production in 2016 1. China ($623 billion) 2. India ($270 billion) 3. United States ($262 billion) 4. Brazil ($156 billion) 5. Indonesia ($70 billion) .... Video: Countries Ranked by Agricultural Production since 1960 to 2016 youtu.be/O7cISjwVZuw
    7
  4656.  Naikomi  Buying a car in China is far cheaper than purchasing a car in Germany. For example, the Chinese hatchback Wuling Hong Guang Mini EV, costs as much as 3 iPhones. Video: Why is this Chinese electric car the world's best selling car https://youtu.be/Zlt7qnRrZ0g
    7
  4657. I've also seen symbols like the yellow and blue "trident" emblem of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists. The ideology of the OUN is described as similar to Italian Fascism, and in Wikipedia it's ideology is described as including the following: -Ukrainian ultranationalism -Ukrainian irredentism -Anti-communism -Anti-Polish sentiment -Anti-Romanian sentiment -Anti-Russian sentiment -Antisemitism -Fascism
    7
  4658.  @diezero2483  Promoting an "international no-shooting day" doesn't solve the fundamental problem. What if American gunman decided to go ballistic during this "international no-shooting day"? Or does its significance imply that gunman are allowed to shoot people during any other day, rather than this "international no-shooting day"?
    7
  4659. China's Type 99 tanks have been compared with Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams, and despite never been tested in combat, has commanded healthy respect from international observers, because the performance parameters are equal to many top Western designs.
    7
  4660.  @cryptorenegade1406  While I support the need for China to improve our PR with the West, I don't believe simply changing the name of the Communist Party of China will help. For example, even though the former Soviet Union has since collapsed, Russia is still perceived as as enemy by NATO countries (even though the original goal of NATO no longer matters now that USSR is gone). Secondly, there are Communist parties elsewhere that just don't get as much flak. The Communist Party of Vietnam has communist in their name, yet Vietnam isn't the main target of Western anti-Communist propaganda. This indicates that changing the name of the party may not improve China's PR with the West.
    7
  4661. An American expat feels he has more freedom living in China than in USA, this goes to show freedoms are "relative". More Westerners need to come to China and experience this freedom for themselves, rather than just blindly believe Western MSM that Chinese people aren't free.
    7
  4662.  @kungflunazi9445  Simply put Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou on the first flight back to China if you want China to consider releasing the two Canadians.
    7
  4663.  @deschan2246  As for soybeans, the US is not the only supplier of soybeans and China can always turn to other soybean suppliers like Brazil and Argentina to make up for the shortfall in US soybeans. Source: scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2156195/soybean-giant-brazil-swoops-us-crop-china-trade-war On the other hand, it is difficult for American soybean farmers to switch to growing other crops and further, US government is paying subsidies to American farmers, and the money from these subsidies come from American taxpayers wallets.
    7
  4664. Colonial mindset brainwashes the colonised to worship the colonizer.
    7
  4665. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multi-polar world, dominated by multiple voices, rather than the uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US and its "allies").
    7
  4666. 西方人从来没有了解过礼数的真意思。
    7
  4667. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major war in 1979. But USA is involved in Afghan War, Iraq War, Libyan War, even in the 21st century, and is cutting off those country's heads (Muammar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now President Trump is targeting Syria and the Assad Regime is next on the list.
    7
  4668. I find it astonishing that Cyrus knows that China is unlike what the media in the west makes it out to be. Yet when it comes to Russia, Cyrus falls for the western narrative.
    7
  4669.  @Andy-P  Earlier in Jan 2022, a Chinese woman (surname Wang) was attacked by Hong Kong separatists, who gathered in Manchester city at about 4:00 pm in front of her shop. She came out and debated with them after hearing them using the word "Shina,'' a derogatory term referring to China. "You can have your opinions, but I won't allow you to separate my country," Wang said in a video circulating on Chinese social media platforms. In the video, one of the separatists - wearing black like rioters in the 2019 violent protests in Hong Kong - suddenly attacked Wang with an umbrella. The Chinese Embassy in the UK condemned the "despicable action" of "Hong Kong independence rioters" for threatening and attacking a Chinese citizen in Manchester and urged British authorities to bring the perpetrators to justice. But the British police let the suspects go. (This news of this attack of a Chinese woman by Hong Kong separatist went unreported in Western Media).
    7
  4670.  @ysw8291  American soldiers also sprayed chemical defoliants that caused birth defects in Vietnamese children decades later. Mines were planted in Vietnam by American soldiers that have killed/maimed many innocent Vietnamese.
    7
  4671.  @ronnylim7907  Liziqi may be YouTube star, with accompanying fans and critics, that much is true. But her content shows she at least has the heart of a common Chinese girl, and she doesn't let all that fame get to her head.
    7
  4672.  @MarkYeung1  You should read the report by Pulitzer prize winning journalist, Seymour Hersh, on who was behind the blowing up of Nordstream pipelines.
    7
  4673.  @wolfgangdevries127  Yeah, and if I got paid a penny by Microsoft for the amount of times my Windows crashed, I'll be a billionaire.
    7
  4674. True NGOs have nothing to fear from a law calling for increased transparency in where they obtain their funds from. Otherwise, they don't deserve to be called nongovernmental organisations.
    7
  4675.  @davidg.3406  Clearly the AR glasses that Chinese speaks of is different from AR - 15 that Americans talk about. And there's the fact that many Americans themselves are mourning the tragic Uvalde shootings.
    7
  4676.  @davidg.3406  Obviously, not every ordinary American is in the defense and aerospace sector, and it's the ordinary Americans suffering from domestic problems like inflation, rising food and fuel costs, healthcare costs, that aren't going to benefit from the $40 billion that the U.S sent to Ukraine. It also begs the question, why not just spend the $40 billion on solving America's domestic problems instead of such a roundabout route through Ukraine (answer: corruption and money laundering).
    7
  4677.  @davidg.3406  You said: "Do you think we'll let the dollar crashing down without bring this entire planet in the blaze of fire?" Why should the entire planet go down with the United States? Also it's actually the Russian ruble that's become the best performing currency of the year. Although it was affected by initial sanctions, the ruble has since recovered to its pre-military operation levels and is in fact stronger than before.
    7
  4678.  @truthaboveall7988  The fact that YouTube has shadow banned your comment, reveals the truth in YT's "judgements of anyone with different cultures/opinions."
    7
  4679.  @brexitgreens  You said: "We are used to a higher standard of conversation here. Disclosure: I'm pro-China but not pro-Kremlin." I'm just giving an analogy that's trending on Weibo and it appears from the number of likes that some viewers found my comment interesting. Who are you to decide how the standard of conversation is to be? As for your statement of being pro-China but not pro-Kremlin, I'm sure that you're aware of Western anti-China propaganda deliberately painting China in a negative light to their audiences. Then have you considered that Western anti-Russian propaganda also doing the same thing for Russia? Why is RT News and Sputnik Radio banned in the West?
    7
  4680.  @brexitgreens  You said: "The world would lose nothing of value if Kremlin went suddenly bust. On contrary, a huge burden on humanity will be lifted." I disagree. The lost of Russia's government would plunge the country into chaos and civil strife. The USA would use such an opportunity to divide and conquer Russia (as they have done to many others). Syria might slip back into civil war without Russia. NATO's eastward expansion would continue unabated until it reaches China's doorstep, presenting an expanded existential threat to our country. Without Russia, China will lose a valuable ally in the United Nations and in the fight against Western Imperialism, and the fight for a more multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices becomes more difficult while living in a uni-polar world dominated by a single voice, that of USA and its allies. And I haven't even talked about Russia's nuclear arsenal yet, they might fall into the wrong hands of terrorists or worse. What makes you think the world wouldn't lose anything of value with the Kremlin gone?
    7
  4681.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou So Japan was within it's right to attack China in 1937 because the root source of the conflict was China?" How is China the root cause of what conflict? You said Nazi Germany attacked Poland, then why are you suddenly bringing up Japan? When Germany attacked Poland, why'd the Allies attacked Germany instead of just limiting the fighting to Poland itself? You need to stop the fighting at the root cause, that's why the Allies attacked Germany. So in Ukraine's case Likewise, the ultra-nationalist, neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion attacked the Donetsk and Luhansk region (for 8 years mind you) so Russia decided to act to put an end to war that began since 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukovych by USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine.
    7
  4682.  Ryan Casey  It's not just that, there's also "white-washing" where Caucasian characters are casted to play characters of Asian descent on film (e.g Scarlet Johanson portraying the protagonist in Ghost in the Shell) This is an opportunity for Hollywood to cast Asian actor, but they choose to cast Caucasian actor to play a character of Asian descent. Video: Why Doesn't Hollywood Cast Asian Actors? youtu.be/XkfrZ91jA_0
    7
  4683.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  Even the Indians love Chinese products. For example, Xiaomi is the number one smartphone brand in India according to CNBC. Video: How Xiaomi broke out of China to go global youtu.be/291DlKa7iIU
    7
  4684. Kishore is ostensibly quite knowledgeable about ASEAN region, China's system and the US's preconceived views about China. But when it comes to Ukraine and Russia (and other regions like the Gaza and the Middle East) he tends to stick to the Singapore perspective (which follows the Western perspective).
    7
  4685.  @MarkYeung1  Since you feel proud of the Chinese athletes in Taipei and Hong Kong winning gold, then I suppose you also feel proud when the mainland Chinese athletes wins gold as well. They are all part of China after all and represent the Chinese people at the Olympics.
    7
  4686. Jesse Mac China has pollution problems but at least China is taking steps to rectify the problem such selling more electric vehicles as shown in this video here. But President Trump is trying to bring coal plants back to USA, and he even withdrew USA from the 2017 Paris Climate Agreement.
    7
  4687. The whole "Yellow Peril" mindset never truly died out. Since 19th century, Westerners are accustomed to being the dominant culture on the Earth, so the very thought of a non-Western power eventually surpassing the West is too frightening to conceive, yet it's becoming a reality.
    7
  4688.  @ryannverano6452  About the South China Sea, the North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    7
  4689. China first invented paper and the paper banknote, and eventually the rest of the world followed with paper currencies of their own. Now China is rolling out digital Renminbi, and eventually, the rest of the world will follow with digital currencies of their own.
    7
  4690.  @andrenogueira5058  The UN Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the UN Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The poll results were: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained ... Source: Wikipedia: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 Since the PRC won the vote with two-third majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971 and recognized the PRC as "the only legitimate representative of China to the UN" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" from the UN. In other words, the UN countries democratically voted to recognize the communist's legitimacy over China in the UN.
    7
  4691.  @zebimicio5204  I never said Singapore is bad because of authoritarianism, in fact I actually remarked how Singapore's political system resembles China's in certain aspects that's all.
    7
  4692. It's the story of the Tortoise and the Hare in a race. NATO is behaving like the Hare, throwing everything they have at Russia (from sanctions to sending weapons to Ukraine) and exhausting themselves even before reaching the finish line, yet they mock the Russian advancement as slow. Russia is behaving like the Tortoise, having weathered the worst of the sanctions yet still making slow but incremental progress towards the finish line.
    7
  4693.  @holybutterfly8495  What makes you think that just because you think a system is good for Australia, that China (or the whole world) should adopt it?
    7
  4694.  @iRelevant.47.system.boycott  Vietnam gained independence from France in 1945. Pham van Dong's diplomatic letter to Zhou Enlai was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958.
    7
  4695.  @davidhammond6189  It's too bad that anti-China sentiment is growing in Australia, even though Australia is located closer to Asia than America and China is Australia's biggest trading partner.
    7
  4696.  @gulamog5041  Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for 30 years already?
    7
  4697. If the leader has shown to be strong and capable of leading the country, then I don't see what's wrong with extending his presidential term, in order to maximize the most benefits possible for China. Its not as though its permanent position for him. China should follow our own path to success, not just blindly copy the Western government system.
    7
  4698. In a poll of nearly 7500 readers by the United Daily News (Taiwan Newspaper) website, 61 percent said the trip was not welcome as it may destabilise the Taiwan Strait. Only 38 percent welcomed the visit and said it had more advantages than disadvantages.
    7
  4699. Matt M. You are entitled to your own opinion of course, but so am I. These two have never regarded China as their home and neither have they regarded Chinese people as their fellow countrymen. They constantly refer to China like its a strange foreign country, filled with strange people different from themselves. Just look at their faces, expressions and mannerisms. Do they talk about China, like they would do about their home country? Do they regard Chinese people as their fellow brethren? Why can't you peer through their fake enthusiasm and see what they really feel about China?
    7
  4700.  @supermantom2456  China is cracking down on fentanyl, how is it making it shine?
    7
  4701. At least with Trump, he didn't care about China's internal issues like Xinjiang, Hong Kong, or Taiwan, but the new Biden Administration is actively pursuing these "issues" with China. Furthermore, like you said, Biden hasn't removed Trump's tarrifs and sanctions on China, so it's arguably worst under Biden than Trump.
    7
  4702. ​ @currentchannel3452  "神州 Shenzhou Shut up" So you can bring up China changing the ending of David Fincher’s 1999 movie, 《Fight Club》, but when I pointed out the China's ending is closer to the original Chuck Palahniuk's 1996 novel of the same name, you tell me to shut up?
    7
  4703. The role of women today are vastly different from the past (especially in the West). Feminism has empowered women at the workplace, encouraged women to dominate their partners in relationships, and because of the Western culture of "political correctness", everybody is afraid to voice their own opinions, for fear of offending feminists (and also ethnic minority groups, LGBT activists, etc) and receiving the backlash from SJWs. Because of feminism, young girls are encouraged to pursue whatever they want, eat whatever they want, act unfeminine, to get tattoos and piercings, to grow fat and unattractive, and yet, Western media will claim that men will still find them attractive. Maybe some men will, but not all of them find them attractive, and if men find you ugly, then the media will claim they are being "shallow" and they don't "see the beauty within you" and that they deserve you. Frankly, I think many Western men are sick of this PC culture always blaming men for women's problems. There was a simpler time in the past. A simpler period in every country's history, where everything was traditional. Men worked and women tended the families. Because of this setup, families could grow larger with mothers taking care of the kids. Birth rates were higher in the past, but as modern women started taking on careers and competing with men at the workplace, children became neglected, family sizes shrunk, birth rates fell. If you don't believe me, look at the less developed and more traditional countries. Traditional Muslims for example, tend to have large families, because they can have multiple wives (if the husbands can support them) Maybe it's time modern people change their mindset about "traditional values" and stop seeing them as backward and barbaric. For much of human history, women have been traditionally the wives and mothers of society, so there must be various advantages why humans adopted such a setup in the first place.
    7
  4704. I agree with you but I think you chose the wrong examples. Korean War and Vietnam War are more accurate examples.
    6
  4705. +nubkiller lol But there are people who never even been to China and they seriously believe everything China uncensored says about China.
    6
  4706. The Allies won against the Axis during WW2 because even though their tanks were inferior, they had more factories and could produce more than the Nazis.
    6
  4707.  @showalk  No, it's not the same end product. Tell you what, have you tried writing English words where you deliberately mess up the order in which the alphabets are written? Like say, writing the alphabets from right to left instead of left to right? Or randomly starting in the middle of the word? Of course the finished word would look different from a correctly written word from left to right. So, it's the same concept with Chinese characters, using the wrong word order results in an incorrect (or the very least, an ugly looking character). That's why stroke order was invented long ago for Chinese characters.
    6
  4708. +Mewmewmew:3 US supported S.Korea and prevented Korea from being unified.
    6
  4709. +James Monteath When China first joined WTO, intellectual property law was poorly understood, which led to Chinese copying western ideas as the government was focused on catch up to the West. But now, Chinese I.P laws have greatly improved from few years ago, but probably isn't as good as Western I.P laws. I also agree that poor I.P laws also harm Chinese companies as it discourage creativity. Chinese companies recognised this too and are pushing the government to approve stricter I.P laws in China. But, in my opinion China is always going to be biased against any Western technology, until we no longer see Western technology as superior. Pollution in China is well known and I won't deny China's eco problems. But the government has made green initiatives like eco-friendly buses in Beijing and by investing in solar, wind and water energy. China is currently world's largest producer of green energy but we are still heavily reliant on coal for power, which burns dirtily. It will probably take years for China to reduce our fossil fuel consumption and switch to renewable energy.
    6
  4710.  @garam6555  If you read Taiwan's constitution, Taiwan is part of China and since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution (or any move to formally declare independence) then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Another thing is that Chinese President Xi Jinping actually proposed to former Taiwan President Ma Ying-Jeou to extend the One Country, Two Systems policy to include Taiwan, so that Taiwan is considered reunified with the mainland, but allowed to keep their own separate government (much like how Hong Kong have their own separate government from the mainland) and the mainland is allowed to keep ours. But Ma Ying-jeou rejected Xi's offer and did not propose a counter offer of their own.
    6
  4711.  @night6724  Erm... why is it sad that an American citizen who was trained in the US decided to take yuan from the Communist Party of China, when you just said most Americans are fine with Asians and that Asian Americans are the wealthiest Americans, with no shortage of money apparently?
    6
  4712.  @derquantenalchemist5180  Hey, are you related to another user called The Quantum Alchemist?
    6
  4713.  @chrishamlin5863  You said: "神州 Shenzhou I know that many horrible things happenned at Guantanamo Bay." Since you know about it, then why isn't this issue being addressed?
    6
  4714. + 자유로운 영혼 Korea was once a strong unified country under Joseon dynasty, but today Korea is shadow of its former self. 1/2 of Korea relies on China for trade, the other 1/2 relies on USA for defense. About 1/3 of Koreans is locked up and starving in DPRK, and all of North Korea's resources is inaccessible to the South. The DPRK relies on China to survive, whereas ROK sells its prostitutes to US army, to keep them occupied and to protect itself from DPRK Prostitutes in South Korea for the U.S. military wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitutes_in_South_Korea_for_the_U.S._military So before China even goes to war with ROK, the DPRK will gladly do it for China.
    6
  4715. ​ @yslee1401  All verified eyewitness accounts said that no one died that night in Tiananmen Square and that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. Student leader Wu’er Kaixi said he had seen 200 students cut down by gunfire, but it was later proven that he left the square several hours before the events he described allegedly occurred. CBS correspondent Richard Roth claimed he heard raging gunfire, but Black and Munro quote a Chinese eyewitness who says the gunfire was from army commandos shooting out the student loudspeakers at the top of the monument. So it was aimed at loudspeakers not at the students themselves. A BBC reporter watching from a high floor of the Beijing Hotel said he saw soldiers shooting at students at the monument in the center of the square. But as the many journalists who tried to watch the action from that relatively safe vantage point can attest, the middle of the square is not visible from the hotel. (Taken from Columbia Journalism Review)
    6
  4716.  @ashpatel2505  "Can you define “Colonial Mentality“?" Colonial mentality is when a someone subconsciously continues to worship Western culture, while harboring a disdain for any "non-white" culture (including their own), as a result of being colonized. Long after a territory has been decolonized, the minds of the people may still remain "colonized" till this day. "It’s Chinese people who don’t use their chinese names if they are living in a western country," Yeah, because Mandarin names are extremely difficult to pronounce correctly by Westerners and the words do not translate well to the English/Latin alphabet. So some Chinese adopt an English name for convivence. "...but Indians don’t adopt western names! " Because Indian names translate well into English/Latin alphabet. "And you are saying that Indians have colonial mentality!" Read my post carefully, I said many Indians (but not all) tend to have this colonial mentality. "I didn’t say anything derogatory about Chinese people, and my comments were about the Chinese government," I never said you did. "So please hold your emotional outburst and feeling gratified by attacking Indians for colonial mindset." Who's getting emotional here? All I stated was that many Indians (but not all) tend to have the colonial mentality (of which you seem to agree) how is that an emotional outburst to achieve gratification?
    6
  4717.  @ashpatel2505  "BRI is crumbling as economically fragile countries are struggling!" Last year, Nicaragua and Argentina joined the Belt and Road Initiative. So far, 21 Latin American and Caribbean countries have signed BRI cooperation documents with China, so how exactly is BRI crumbling? "Ask yourself a question why are Indians respected in most countries they live in, and why are they financially and professionally successful? Compare that to why are Chinese not respected as you own complained?" Because like I said earlier, many Indians (but not all) tend to have the "colonial mentality" and that means that they know their place. They become the CEOs of Western corporations, but ultimately these corporations belong to the West, whereas many Chinese are CEOs of our own Chinese companies, which has led to Chinese being viewed with suspicion by others.
    6
  4718.  @ashpatel2505  Why can't Russia be part of this new world order? Russia is the world's largest country by landmass, and they are a major exporter of oil, gas, fertilizer and grain, so shouldn't they be included in the new world order? Even India maintains good relations with Russia, yet your singling out China for having good relations with Russia? Also, can't North Korea also be a part of this new world order? Today, North Korea is being excluded because of the U.S sanctions hindering its economic growth. Won't it be better to include N. Korea, lift those sanctions (that don't seem to work) and allow companies to expand business operations in Pyongyang? I'm sure Chinese companies would love to do more business in N. Korea and help develop their country. But their hands are tied with those sanctions in place.
    6
  4719.  @ashpatel2505  "And I have been to six of the ASEAN countries and no, they all don’t love China." Could you tell us which six ASEAN countries have you been to? "They often talk about Tiananmen Square, and what China did to people in HongKong." Tiananmen Square is one of the largest parade squares in China, where Chairman Mao Zedong proclaimed the founding of the Peoples Republic of China in 1949, and where the Portrait of Mao is hung, so it's not unusual that it appears as a topic of conversation among people. And China's economic growth has helped spur on Hong Kong's economic growth as well.
    6
  4720. 让阿三继续做白日梦。
    6
  4721. I thought the greatest defeat in U.S military history has to be the Vietnam War where the might U.S army lost the war to a bunch of dirt-poor, starving, Vietnamese communist peasants. Alternatively, the mighty U.S Army also lost the Afghan War after nearly 20 years to the Taliban.
    6
  4722.  @normanquimpo1475  No one calls it the "West Philippines Seas" it's known internationally as the South China Sea in world maps.
    6
  4723.  @normanquimpo1475  Philippines have been grabbing territory from China, look at what they did to Thitu Island. It had been occupied by the Japanese during WWII, but after Japanese surrender in 1945, the island was returned to the Republic of China. But in 1971 following a typhoon hitting the island, the ROC authorities ordered all the garrisons on Thitu Island to withdraw to Taiping Island to avoid the typhoons. The Philippines took advantage of Chinese troops withdrawal to occupy the island and claim it for themselves.
    6
  4724. ASPI is not to be trusted, especially when you look into who funds this organisation.
    6
  4725.  @ColoniaMurder20  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Tibet briefly broke free of China in 1913 but wasn't recognised as an independent country and by 1951, Tibet had reunified with the rest of China. Inner Mongolia became part of China after the Mongols themselves made Mongolia part of Yuan Dynasty China. And Xinjiang was part of China since Han Dynasty (220 BC) where it was known as Xiyu (西域).
    6
  4726.  @fannyalbi9040  "神州 Shenzhou it is another form of stockholm syndrome." Exactly. A ‘colonial mentality’ shows a preference or desirability for whiteness and cultural values, behaviors, physical appearances and objects from or derivative of the ‘West’ (i.e. Western Europe or the USA), with disdain or undesirability for anything coming from the non- ‘West’. "Decolonizing the mind" means recognizing the Western colonial bias guiding their everyday perceptions and actions, and learning to dissociate from this way of thinking.
    6
  4727. Peng Shuai is clearly safe and she has appeared on IOC video call expressing her desire for her personal privacy to be respected. But the WTA is behaving like the paparazzi and demanding that she appear in public to bare her private affairs for all the world to see.
    6
  4728.  @kd5055  "神州 Shenzhou Peng Shui is clearly safe after having her posts pulled down and being kidnapped by the totalitarian ccp goons." Peng Shuai's previous relationship with a much older man has been revealed, and she wants to keep a low profile that's why she's been avoiding the public eye for weeks until this all blows over. She's clearly fine, she's been seen attending small gatherings and even appeared on a video call with IOC, but the WTA are determined to blow this out of proportion in order to malign China. Literally politicizing sports.
    6
  4729.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Spoken openly, then “disappeared” by the CCP for concerns of questioning their totalitarian position." No, Peng Shuai was avoiding the public eye because her previous relationship with a much older man has been revealed. She's keeping a low profile, but she is clearly fine as she's been seen in small gatherings, then why can't WTA respect Peng Shuai's wishes for personal privacy?
    6
  4730.  @MarkYeung1  In that televised address, Putin publicly stated that Russia has no plans to occupy Ukraine.
    6
  4731.  @goinbulilit3846  Come to think of it, previously while Hong Kong was still a British colony, there were virtually no elections were held in Hong Kong for 150 years as a British colony. Yet in the British's "lease", they suddenly demand elections and Western democracy be implemented in Hong Kong, when they had none before.
    6
  4732.  @daomingjin  You said: "China stopped being a country when the Nationalists Fled to Taiwan." What? You make it sound as though all of mainland China's sovereignty and legacy is determined by a small group of people who call themselves Nationalist Kuomintang. Why'd the KMT fled to Taiwan island in the first place? At the start of the Chinese Civil War, the KMT had massive wealth (taxed off peasants) superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, who were at the brink of annihilation. Yet despite their overwhelming advantage, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of impoverished, ill-equipped and starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan island? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the CPC's right to rule China. Who gives the KMT the right to determine mainland China's sovereignty, given that they've lost the mainland?
    6
  4733. Like I said, at most the exporters pay when they export out of China, but the US tariffs are born by the importers who pass the cost on to the consumers themselves.
    6
  4734. Russia and China are facilitating the global transition towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, rather than the uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US and its "allies").
    6
  4735. Agreed. When Saudi Arabian prince killed a journalist, Trump even stood with the Saudi rince, calling the journalist an enemy of the state. Even the new Biden administration is reluctant to call out the Saudi prince's actions. It's U.S double standards as always.
    6
  4736.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "between the spring of 1959 and the end of 1961 some 30 million Chinese starved to death" You said 30 million starved to death? The population of China in 1955 was around 605 million and by 1960, China's population had actually increased to 667 million (by 62 million). So you're saying that China's population decreased by around 30 million from 1959 to 1961, but is has been shown that China's population from 1955 to 1965 actually increased by more than 60 million?
    6
  4737.  @yuanfangli9272  You said: "The Chinese do not like the Communist Party." A joint study by Harvard University and Ash Research Center has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China.
    6
  4738.  @youtubeshadowbannedme  "神州 Shenzhou delete your account" Why should I delete my account? Who do you think you are?
    6
  4739.  @dnguyen787  "She asked tough questions." She basically asked different variations of "Are you going to condemn Russia?" and she won't take NO for answer. She'll just keep repeating her question again and again until she hears the answer she wants to hear, instead of actually listening to his answer.
    6
  4740.  @cherylderue336  You said: "Chinese labor laws in Africa are not good." The Labour Law of the People's Republic of China (中华人民共和国劳动法) doesn't apply to African countries, how is China responsible for labor laws in Africa? Chinese labor law says that employees should not be asked to work more than eight hours a day and no more than 44 hours a week, on average. And you said Chinese bosses open fire on workers protesting of poor pay, where do they get the guns, you tell me?
    6
  4741. China experienced it earlier, when it was discovered that terrorist cells like the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) were using Facebook to coordinate their terrorits activities in Xinjiang. Facebook ignored China's requests to take down those ETIM accounts, so China decided to block Facebook.
    6
  4742.  @edwardr8826  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party Kuomintang rule for more than half its life! For decades, KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and KMT leader Chiang kai-shek was dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and declared Martial Law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan rapidly modernized and flourished in what's known as Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹) Between 1952 and 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 and 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan's GDP grew by 360% between 1965 and 1986 and the percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 and 1986. And it all occurred under authoritarian KMT rule. Only when democracy was introduced to Taiwan (because the USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan if KMT did not introduce political reforms) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest in the 1990s. Today, Taiwan's economy is in a slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, and graduates in Taiwan are unable to find jobs locally, so many seek employment opportunities abroad, such as in mainland China or in Singapore.
    6
  4743.  @JD-yz4kr  You asked: "How will China be sure these people are not spies or saboteurs?" Beijing Olympics Committee is setting up a Covid-19 "bubble" that will prevent limit people residing within from physical interactions outside of this bubble. Athletes and officials movements will be monitored if they decide to leave this bubble.
    6
  4744.  @UltraGamer9999999999  "神州 Shenzhou Japanese wet markets are super clean, cannot compare to China lool." Video: Hakodate Seafood Market - Japan youtu.be/SskPtUAcUKQ How's it any different from China's? And I don't see any terrestrial animals being sold in that video.
    6
  4745. The song names for the two traditional Chinese instruments (Guqin and Guzheng) are different. For Guqin 古琴, the song is Flowing Water 《流水》 For Guzheng 古筝, the song is High Mountains and Flowing Waters 《高山流水》
    6
  4746.  @seancurran3034  This is a detailed reconstruction of the Ukrainian-Russian peace negotiations in March 2022 taken from Brave New Europe: Peace for Ukraine On March 28, Putin, as a sign of goodwill and in support of the peace negotiations, declared readiness to withdraw troops from the Kharkov area and the Kiev area; this apparently occurred even before his public announcement. –Brave New Europe: Peace for Ukraine
    6
  4747.  Alex  But the problem is that while Westerners boast about freedom of speech, yet if you mention anything remotely positive about China, the Westerners will start labelling you as 50 cent shill, just for bringing up positive things about China. Some freedom of speech……
    6
  4748.  @MarkYeung1  "Tell me how much you know about Hong Kong and Hong Kong people." Hong Kong is a capitalist haven. It is home to the crazy rich and the mega poor. Companies pay no taxes so the Hong Kong's only form of income comes from taxing the sales of land, which is controlled by the property tycoons, who jack up property prices to be beyond the reach of many young Hong Kong couples seeking to buy an apartment and settle down. This has caused much anger among Hong Kong youth, who find that housing prices are becoming unaffordable to them.
    6
  4749.  @dawei666  Multiple crimes of what? Meng's arrest was in 2018 and its already 2020, so what have the Canadians been doing for the last 2 years? And no trial too? Then it's a ploy by USA to strike economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride.
    6
  4750. Video: Donbass: The Grey Zone. Life in the frontline villages | RT Documentary youtu.be/Kc7P6j6og4k
    6
  4751. As Chinese myself, I personally found many Hollywood movies to be severely lacking in Asian actors. Asian actors (Chinese,Japanese, Koreans) are simply underrepresented in Hollywood, often casted into cliche roles like martial artist, triad thug, nerdy but social inept guy, hacker, etc. Asian actresses often get roles as damsel in distress (to be saved by Caucasian male lead) or prostitutes, dragon ladies, massage parlor workers, other sexualized roles etc. Also, there's also "white-washing" of Asian characters, that is, the casting of Caucasian actor/actress to portray a character of Asian descent on film. Hopefully, China's influence on Hollywood can grant more prominent roles to Asian actors/actresses.As Chinese myself, I personally found many Hollywood movies to be severely lacking in Asian actors. Asian actors (Chinese,Japanese, Koreans) are simply underrepresented in Hollywood, often casted into cliche roles like martial artist, triad thug, nerdy but social inept guy, hacker, etc. Asian actresses often get roles as damsel in distress (to be saved by Caucasian male lead) or prostitutes, dragon ladies, massage parlor workers, other sexualized roles etc. Also, there's also "white-washing" of Asian characters, that is, the casting of Caucasian actor/actress to portray a character of Asian descent on film. (Take Scarlet Johanson in Ghost in the Shell for example) Hopefully, China's influence on Hollywood can shift their target demographics and in the process, help grant more prominent roles to aspiring Asian actors/actresses.
    6
  4752. Ukraine has been shelling and killing ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Luhansk, and over the course of 8 years, over 14,000 civilians have been killed in the Donbas region, and this documentary chronicles of lives of ethnic Russians living in Donbas. Video: Donbass: The Grey Zone. Life in the frontline villages youtu.be/Kc7P6j6og4k
    6
  4753.  @alexantollin564  It was Zelenskyy's aide, Mykhailo Podolyak that made those derogatory remarks about Chinese and Indians.
    6
  4754.  @zenlei8258  How am I naive? I'm just explaining Zelenskyy's reasons for not signing the Minsk Agreements. Zelenskyy promised to bring peace to Eastern Ukraine during his election campaign, but he is unable to fulfill his election promise, because the Ukraine neo-Nazis threaten to kill him, if he signs the Minsk Agreement. Being a Jew himself makes him a target for the fascist groups like the Azov Battalion, so even though he is president, he is powerless to stop the Azov's bombardment of Donetsk and Lugansk.
    6
  4755. Yes. Many Westerners don't know that Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    6
  4756.  @Ass_of_Amalek  Jack Ma is certainly free enough to access his accounts and donate relief money.
    6
  4757.  @michaels4255  You said: "Also, his claims showed a total lack of comprehension of how democracies work; the Americans he accused simply would not have had the authority to make any such promises," Well, because the Philippines was never a Western-style democracy in earlier history, so of course it's a given that he won't know the workings of a such a system he never encountered. And if those Americans that made a promise of Philippine independence knowing that they don't have the power to grant independence, that it's basically Americans lying to the Filipino rebels with false promises of independence.
    6
  4758. @PowerGuy1 "神州 Shenzhou America didn't colonize the Phillipines." That's strange. Why is it that the Filipinos speak such good English if the Americans supposedly didn't colonize the Philippines? The minds of the colonized are encouraged to speak the language of their colonizers, over that of their own local languages, and that is how the "colonial mentality" is created and continues to plague many former colonies long after decolonization.
    6
  4759.  @mate3238  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    6
  4760. In fact, China has world's largest number of Internet users according to Wikipedia: List of countries by number of Internet users
    6
  4761. More like the 4 horsemen of the Apocalypse
    6
  4762.  @cchannel7857  Cyrus said in his email that he's been very busy lately which was why he had a late response to CGTN's proposal. So it's possible that he was simply too busy at that time to work out payment details, that's why the payment discussion was delayed. It's not uncommon for payment details to be worked out later after the business transaction occurred, so what are you trying to say?
    6
  4763.  @xpro2009  You said: "And so are the surveillance system with social credit scoring." Surveillance in China is necessary because China has such a huge population at 1.4 billion people, whereas the police force in China is only around 3.6 million (2018) which equated to rate of 258 officers per 100k population in China. That's below the international median of 300 officers per 100k according to UN, so by implementing surveillance system, it helps ease the shortage of officers needed to monitor the public and maintain order. Thanks to the surveillance system and advanced facial recognition system, the crime rate in China has fallen drastically, and people feel safe to walk around the streets in China. Even girls can walk around safely at night at 3 am in the cities.
    6
  4764.  @xpro2009  The Social Credit System in China is just a malicious myth. Closest equivalent in China would be the credit card rating (like the rest of the world) for people wanting to apply for a credit card and it's tied to a person's finances. But there's no such system tied to "social credit".
    6
  4765. As Chinese myself, I personally found many Hollywood movies to be severely lacking in Asian actors. Asian actors (Chinese,Japanese, Koreans) are simply underrepresented in Hollywood, often casted into cliche roles like martial artist, triad thug, nerdy but social inept guy, hacker, etc. Asian actresses often get roles as damsel in distress (to be saved by Caucasian male lead) or prostitutes, dragon ladies, massage parlor workers, other sexualized roles etc. Also, there's also "white-washing" of Asian characters, that is, the casting of Caucasian actor/actress to portray a character of Asian descent on film. Hopefully, China's influence on Hollywood can grant more prominent roles to Asian actors/actresses.
    6
  4766.  @kenadams5504  To describe "reasonable force" or whether civilian casualties are necessary, there has to be a comparison of sorts. If we look at the U.S invasion of Iraq, according to Iraq Body Count some 7,299 civilians are documented to have been killed, primarily by U.S. air and ground forces by the end of the major combat phase. Although it's still too early to tell if the number of civilian casualties in Ukraine at the moment, ostensibly Russia appears to be holding back at the moment (although this may change).
    6
  4767. The world has become a game board. USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    6
  4768. I think it's because the Chinese government regulates the Chinese fintech and social media, which is why it's better for the average Chinese citizens. In the United States, the rich U.S corporations are unregulated and in fact, they even control the U.S government. For example, Facebook (Meta), Twitter, Instagram, etc have the power to ban the then U.S President Trump's social media account, even while he was still technically the POTUS at that time.
    6
  4769. Hong Kong had previously been under British rule from 1841-1997. Hong Kong 1956 riots left 59 dead Hong Kong 1967 riots left 51 dead Whereas Hong Kong 2019 riots had ZERO deaths thus far, so props to HK police for showing incredible restraint.
    6
  4770. Why Indians so eager to see Pakistan fall? If Pakistan suddenly collapse, then it's neighbours like India, China and Afghanistan will be flooded by mass refugees from Pakistan. China is helping develop Pakistan through economic corridor project, creating jobs for people, so that they can develop their own country. India and Pakistan been fighting each other for about 70 years already. Why not mend relations instead of continuing to oppose each other? How are you going to make Asia strong if you keep on fighting among yourselves?
    6
  4771. Looking from Pakistan perspective, India also supported Bangladesh independence from East Pakistan, so isn't India being hostile towards Pakistan as well, by dividing its country and creating Bangladesh? Why you allow your original country of British India, to become so divided today? Each division only weakens the former country, and create tensions between the individual states. Just imagined if British India had resisted the British and chosen to remained "unpartitioned" and all those conflicts and bloodshed between India and Pakistan didn't happened. Where would India be today if history happened differently? But its too late now, and Pakistan is its own sovereign country, and so is Bangladesh. Why do you want to keep on opposing each other, even after 70 years? How will Asia ever become strong, if we are constantly fighting amongst ourselves? China wants to make Asia strong, by building infrastructure in less developed countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Maldives, Sri Lanka, Nepal, because we believe building infrastructure is laying the foundations for countries to develop themselves. Look at the Western approach to terrorism. They invade Middle East country and bomb their cities, resulting in civilian casualties, and these people become angry and join the terrorists to fight against USA. For example, Al Qaeda was once trained by CIA, but eventually rebelled against USA. Even the formation of ISIL has been credited to USA's constant intervention in Middle Eastern wars. When a terrorist cell is destroyed, another one pops up in its place, so it is apparent that US approach simply does not work. So why should we follow their approach then, when its been fighting wars in Middle East for 15 years without end in sight?
    6
  4772.  @night6724  About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    6
  4773.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Should the government listen to the Chinese people and open up the internet? Taiwan (a part of China) does." Where does it say that Chinese people want to open up the Internet more? Even despite the restrictions, Chinese can still use VPN to access Western websites, then why should the government change the Internet policy? The people of Taiwan can have their say, but their voice doesn't represent mainlander's voices.
    6
  4774.  @namelesssnitchy  We shall see indeed. While China is buying Russian gas at a discount, European countries are resorting to energy rationing in order to prepare for the upcoming winter.
    6
  4775.  @Nesher92  China is home to many of the world's largest banks including ICBC, China Construction Bank, AgBank, Bank of China, Bank of Communications, Postal Savings Bank of China, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank (China), Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, China CITIC Bank, China Minsheng Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Hua Xia Bank, Bank of Beijing, China Guangfa Bank, Bank of Shanghai, Bank of Jiangsu, China Zheshang Bank and so on. Source: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks#By_total_assets But where are the famous companies from Hong Kong and Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How can Hong Kong or Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    6
  4776.  @Nesher92  Could you please explain how China did not respect the Sino-British declaration? Currently, Hong Kong has their own government separate from the mainland and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections, it's the people of Hong Kong who elect their leader. For 150 years, Hong Kong was under the authoritarian rule of colonial Britain, whereas after the 1997 handover, Hong Kong people finally enjoy democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, so how did China not respect the Sino-British declaration?
    6
  4777.  @Nesher92  Why resort to hurling personal insults against me for my views, just because my views happen to differ from yours? I've been citing numerous articles and sources to support my arguments, but you done is make claims without supporting evidence.
    6
  4778. @nationalghost Can you explain why you think so? When Dr. Sun Yatsen overthrew the Qing dynasty and established Republic of China in 1911, China was divided into various provinces, we lost control of Tibet, and individual warlords ruled various provinces of China in a chaotic period. Even the Japanese invaded China during this weak period and Dr. Sun died without ever realizing a unified China. Then under communism, China was finally unified (which the previous KMT administration failed to achieve even after 37 years) and Mao Zedong proclaimed the People's Republic of China in 1949. Tibet was eventually returned to China in 1952, and China was finally unified and able to grow to where we are today. So what makes you think without the CCP, people will do better than this? Without CCP, China would have remained fragmented and divided, instead of the unified country we are today.
    6
  4779.  cantonpillow  Wasn't your original topic about a list of technologies that China invented, not cloned? Why are you suddenly limiting the era?
    6
  4780. @nationalghost The Republic of China (1912-1949) was hardly even considered a proper "democratic" constitution. Only 2 elections were ever held in Republic of China's history in the mainland, one in 1912 and one in 1948, near the end of its rule, so how can you consider ROC a democracy you tell me? The KMT were authoritarian dictators who didn't really care about democracy, only about seizing power that's all. The KMT leader Chiang Kai-Shek is a Chinese dictator, who killed, possibly 10 million people and committed 228 massacres during his 18 year rule. So again, how does this justify KMT's right to rule mainland China? Despite every possible advantage they had (wealth, manpower, weapons, etc) they still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa. This clearly shows KMT is simply unfit to rule the mainland.
    6
  4781. It's capitalism at work, where Japanese government refuse to spend more money building storage or better treatment facilities, because it's not profitable to do so. Even Japanese Fukushima residents are protesting their government's decision to dump irradiated waters, they spent 10 years recovering from Fukushima disaster, now demand for their seafood products are going to take a hit again.
    6
  4782.  @valeenoi2284  You said: "@Shawn Learn ti rebut before making a fool of yourself. Answer the question…" You're first comment on this thread wasn't even a question, it was just a statement. There is no question mark in your first comment on this thread, so what's there for him to answer?
    6
  4783.  @pierremarel  Which of those smaller countries has had retribution for not aligning with China's policy? For example the Pacific Islands nations of Marshall Islands, Nauru, Palau, and Tuvalu recognize Taipei over Beijing, and yet China is doing business with them?
    6
  4784.  @papa_pt  In the past, as a British colony, Hong Kong was once a thriving port city closest to mainland China, (while the mainland was still dirt-poor at that time) Today however, times have changed and Hong Kong has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan and is facing increasing competition from upcoming mainland cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian, etc. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage And this is in spite of mainland cities being under CCP leadership, whereas Hong Kong is under their own democratic government. No wonder why the Hong Kong people feel like they're being left behind as mainland cities start surpassing them.
    6
  4785.  @zackk4969  Then why is China currently the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people?
    6
  4786.  @zackk4969  Lu Xun was an avant-garde Chinese writer who was celebrated for his fictional works and amongst his great works of is the “Diary of a Madman”.《狂人日记》. But why are you basing China's thousand years of history on a work of fiction?
    6
  4787. China On Track To Become World’s Largest Christian Country By 2025, Experts Say Source:huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/22/china-largest-christian-country_n_5191910.html
    6
  4788. There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    6
  4789. Have you actually seen the sheer number of bridges in China? China even connected Hong Kong to the mainland through world's longest undersea bridge.
    6
  4790. China have unveiled plans to find, catch and land on an asteroid with an unmanned craft and mine the rock for metals like palladium, platinum and others that are used in items such as smartphones and cars. China plans asteroid base for interstellar travel and mining news.com.au/technology/science/space/china-plans-asteroid-base-for-interstellar-travel-and-mining/news-story/00e9cd1bcab89f2736734074a602ea47
    6
  4791.  @sibtainraza8673  Falcon Heavy has not yet proven it can lift its specified maximum payload, and while its first launch occurred on 6 February 2018, but it has not yet launched a heavy or super-heavy payload. Source: Super heavy-lift launch vehicle wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_heavy-lift_launch_vehicle#Unproven China also has Long March 9 currently in the works that is planned for a maximum payload capacity of 140,000 kg to LEO, 50,000 kg to Lunar Transfer Orbit or 44,000 kg to Mars and expected to be launched by 2028.
    6
  4792. It's the literal definition of the opposite of a meritocracy. People get promoted if they display incompetence.
    6
  4793.  Andrew Ski  How dumb can someone be to not understand what Westerners stole from Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals?
    6
  4794. I would suggest a gradual transition process for Thailand. Right now Thailand's information space is probably 100% under Western control (i.e Facebook, Twitter, Google, etc) they should start learning from China or Russia (or some other non-Western source) how to create their own local social media domain. Then slowly change the market share to 50% foreign and 50% local.
    6
  4795.  @Andy-P  You said: "Russia is different. No aspirations other than producing raw materials and war." Russia's economy is growing whereas many European economies are taking a hit. Putin is boosting AI development in Russia, as well as encouraging local Russian businesses (i.e Vkusno & Tochka, the Russian equivalent of McDonald's). Russia's automotive production in 2023 has increased by 16%. Russia is also working with China on a potential lunar base project from 2031. So if anything, your claim that Russia has "no aspirations" seems rather dismissive of Russia and the Russians themselves.
    6
  4796. suresh VRG Those jobs are given to Chinese workers, by large foreign MNCs like Apple, Nike, etc, that choose to set up shop in China because of the lower wages here. If American workers want those jobs back, then are its people willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers? If not, then the prices of said goods will inevitably increase, and Americans can say bye-bye to the low Walmart prices.
    6
  4797.  @giteshmalhotra7645  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Tibet broke free of China in 1913, but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951 so why should China give up our ancestral lands?
    6
  4798.  suburben yobbo  About the One Child Policy, in the past China was still dirt-poor country, suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems at that time. Why allow families in China to raise multiple kids, only for them to starve to death, succumb to childhood diseases, and having not enough food, not enough hospitals, and not enough schools to send them all to? Why focus all available resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood, and get him into a good school? This is the reasoning behind One-Child Policy. According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Wikipedia: Poverty in China Look at India, world's 2nd largest population country, and India is suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems that China once suffered from in the past.
    6
  4799. Don't blame him, blame Trump for constantly downplaying the coronavirus outbreak in America. World Health Organization been warning of transmission risk in January, despite what Trump claims. Source: WHO warned of transmission risk in January, despite Trump claims theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/09/who-cited-human-transmission-risk-in-january-despite-trump-claims The World Health Organization warned the US and other countries about the risk of human-to-human transmission of Covid-19 as early as 10 January, and urged precautions even though initial Chinese studies at that point had found no clear evidence of that route of infection.
    6
  4800.  Pain Zer0  But the article I quoted was from The Atlantic, not the Communist Party of China. Another Western report, recently published by Chatham House, by Lee Jones & Shahar Hameiri, also debunks the China's so-called "Debt Trap" diplomacy as a myth.
    6
  4801. Photographs have shown that the rocket part faces the northeast, which means that the missile may have arrived the southwest, which is the direction of Ukrainian controlled territory such as Dobropillia. It's possible that the Ukrainian forces orchestrated this attack on Kramatorsk and blamed the Russians for this attack.
    6
  4802.  @Andy-P  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Michaels were arrested in retaliation." The Michaels were arrested on charges of espionage (the info is widely available on Chinese media). But even till today, if you ask anyone the question: "What crime did Meng commit?" hardly anyone can give a straight answer. Meng was arrested and detained for years, to buy time for Canada to come up with a crime to accuse her of. You said: "Also the Michaels were kept in far worse conditions." Again, what is the logic of this comparison? Those two break the law in China, so they get sent to prison in China. Are you expecting China to build a luxurious condominium for the two Michaels? I mean, can't you see the absurdity of your comparison of the living conditions between the two Michaels and Meng Wanzhou?
    6
  4803.  @MarkYeung1  Great Britain was a monarchy under the British King/Queen when they first acquired Hong Kong. Also, returning Hong Kong to China should mean that the territory takes on the same political system as the motherland. It's only normal, yet China allowed an exception for Hong Kong to take on a new political system under the One Country, Two Systems. No other country in the world tolerates a part of their territory taking on a different political system except for China.
    6
  4804.  @kooklocklann9996  "and the resident didn’t like him, so it’s just time" Sounds very fatalistic of you. Surely Abe must have done something enough to garner dislike to become the target of an assassination. Why not explore the possible reasons behind it?
    6
  4805.  @juvianto1391  Liziqi 李子柒's YouTube channel is ranks in the Guinness Book of Records for the most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube.
    6
  4806.  @Andy-P  Ukraine ultra-nationalist neo-Nazis were killing ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Luhansk (collectively known as Donbas) for the past 8 years, and some 14 000 people have been killed in the Donbas War according to the UN. Russia is not starting a war, they are putting an end to one that began in 2014.
    6
  4807. Exactly. I wish more people would at least visit the place, before passing judgment on somewhere they've never been.
    6
  4808. +Daniel Vedberg Sekulic Its the Communist Party of China, but you mean because the party decides to follow a different philosophy, suddenly means the party has to change its own name to fit its philosophy? Why can't the party retain its original name?
    6
  4809. In the comics, Shang-Chi's father was originally Fu Manchu, who was the very embodiment of the Yellow Peril mindset, so it's possible that that's one reason why China doesn't want this movie showing in our cinemas.
    6
  4810.  @intothewrx  How is Beijing not honoring the One Country, Two Systems Policy? Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    6
  4811.  @intothewrx  Previously, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of HK while it was British colony. It's only during the period of Hong Kong's 1997 handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as British colony?
    6
  4812.  @paulhui1563  Many Hongkongers (but not all) tend to have the "colonial mentality." Such people display a preference for Anglo-Saxon culture, while harboring disdain for their own culture. No surprise given that Hong Kong was a former British colony, so the British promoted Western culture and values among Hongkongers, so much that they feel "pride" at being called British subjects. Even after the British left, the minds of many Hongkongers (but not all) remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters.
    6
  4813.  @MarkYeung1  Politics should be about doing what's right, not what's popular. Sometimes, the popular thing may not be right, and the right thing may not be popular.
    6
  4814.  @jonathanbelanger6574  "WW2 Soviet figures in all aspects overly exaggerated by 50%" The Soviet Union suffered the most casualties out of WWII, even more than China. Every year on 9 May, Russia celebrates WWII Victory Day with a mass procession. Participants carry pictures of relatives or family members who served during WWII and virtually every Russian family is affected by WWII, so how can you claim the figures are exaggerated?
    6
  4815.  @stud6060  China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) held an amphibious landing drill off the southern Chinese coast to demonstrate our amphibious warfare capabilities. Video: China's army holds amphibious force sea landing drill youtu.be/Us4805xdhy8 Amphibious assault vehicles practiced seaborne landings with fire support, the brigade organised multiple landings. Different detachments synchronised their battle formations and launched strikes at core positions.
    6
  4816.  @Music4567able  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    6
  4817.  FREEHONGKONG-yn5ij  You mean the West.
    6
  4818.  @Youdontshushh   Did you see my previous post about Philippines? The Philippine government allowed Muslims to vote in a referendum on the proposed creation of an autonomous region in Southern Philippines. Source: Philippines: Muslims vote in referendum on autonomous region theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/21/philippines-muslims-vote-in-referendum-on-new-autonomous-region Why allow Muslims to divide your country and force you to give up your land to form their own country? As Muslims living in your country, they should be attempting to assimilate into your country, not breaking away parts of your country. If this succeeds, there might be a new Islamic country in Southern Philippines and do the Filipinos want that to happen?
    6
  4819. Actually, the world democratically voted to recognise the CPC as the legitimate representative of China back in 1971. The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the UN General Assembly Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The poll results were as follows: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_2758 Since the PRC won the vote with two-thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, recognized the People's Republic of China (PRC) as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" from the United Nations. In other words, the world democratically voted to recognise the CPC as the legitimate representative of China at the United Nations.
    6
  4820.  @currentchannel3452  Where did Cyrus Janssen ever expressed blame towards any single country for Covid-19?
    6
  4821. Actually, the official statement is that China claims the South China Sea Islands, not the waters. China allows Freedom of Navigation, so many merchant vessel and cargo ships pass through SCS everyday. But if U.S warship sails to within 12 NM of islands claimed by China, then China reserve the right to voice infringement on sovereign territory.
    6
  4822.  @carlosgarcao2847  "One question. Were is Ma?" You don't know where yo MaMa is? Are you a lost child?
    6
  4823.  @dedoshucos  2:54 Keep in mind that Huawei doesn't really do much business in the U.S. There's some rural networks but there's not a lot of businesses going on, so this is the US government dictating a Taiwan and China mainland based company can do in other parts of the world. It doesn't really involve the US market but they're engaging.
    6
  4824.  @TPELaoY  You said: "Pleeeease save me the ancient Chinese wisdom lecture. China’s economy is faltering." 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    6
  4825.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You asked: "So does the PRC own Singapore?? They are more Chinese than Taiwanese??" The difference is that Singapore was never historically part of China, whereas Taiwan was indeed historically part of China. Also, the Chinese in Singapore identify themselves as Chinese in their race (according to Singapore ID cards).
    6
  4826.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "The fact is that there are no internationally recognized treaties, policies or UN resolutions that state that Taiwan is part of China." -The 1972 Shanghai Communique is based on USA's acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position. (Source: The Diplomat: The Shanghai Communique:) -UN Resolution 2758 was passed in response to UN Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The voting results were 76 in favor, 35 against and 17 abstained. Since the PRC won the vote with two-thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 1971, and recognized the PRC as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed Taiwan from the UN.
    6
  4827.  @greentea8852  I feel the same way too. I've lost track of the amount of times I've been labelled brainwashed or a communist party shill, just because my views happen to differ from others.
    6
  4828.  @cchannel7857  "神州 Shenzhou My point is His haircut is disgusting." That's what's called an ad hominen fallacy where instead of addressing someone's argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument. In this case, you're attacking his bad haircut instead of attacking the points he brought up.
    6
  4829.  @schmidcl77  For example, the British Royal Navy have employed Chinese laundrymen for nearly a century, but as of Oct 2023, they have terminated this tradition.
    6
  4830.  @SzTz100  Anti-China sentiment has been rising in the UK. British attitudes towards China have been declining since 2019. Even the British Royal Navy has stopped hiring Chinese laundrymen.
    6
  4831.  @schmidcl77  Have you lived in China back when it was poor, and compared it to how it's doing today? China was once a poverty-stricken, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China has transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (in fact, the world's largest economy by purchasing power parity) the factory of the world (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest army, the People's Liberation Army. And it has undergone such a huge change under the leadership of the Chinese government.
    6
  4832.  @DaniboyBR2  What about it? Tiananmen Square is one of China's largest parade squares, and was where Chairman Mao proclaimed the founding of the People's Republic of China and where the portrait of Mao was hung. China celebrated our 70th anniversary of our country's founding with a parade in Tiananmen Square as well as the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China.
    6
  4833. It's obvious that the UN sanctions have not worked on North Korea. Why not try different approach instead? N. Korea usually threatens USA military bases in South Korea, Okinawa Japan and Guam. Why not USA try withdrawing troops from this region, to tempt N. Korea to sit down to disarmament talks? That could contribute much more to reduce tensions on Korean peninsula, than anything China ever did.
    6
  4834.  @blitz12399  "That was Ukraine arming itself with Soviet weapons through weapons sells." Ukraine was arming itself with Soviet weapons sold to them from the west. Yet why are you all sorts of means to deny this fact?
    6
  4835.  @blitz12399  You can't refute my points so you're resorting to ad hominen attacks against me? Soviet weapons are still weapons regardless, and the fact is that Nato has been sending those weapons to Ukraine so my original point still stands.
    6
  4836. China is on board with the rest of the world in combating climate change, China is part of the 2017 Paris Climate Accord and is promoting green renewable energy to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels.
    6
  4837.  @KenVincente  You said: "Why many chinese are leaving china? Why many company leaving China?" Because Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or leisure. Haven't you heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands? Or of Chinese international students studying in your schools and universities? Yet the fact remains that 99% of Chinese who travel overseas return back to China eventually.
    6
  4838.  @rufanuf1  "神州 Shenzhou You said: "China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization... That's what you have been taught." What have you been taught then? China's history IS our Chinese heritage, and throughout China's thousands of years of history, China's political system has always bene one of a strong central government (i.e the Emperor and the Imperial Court). And the PRC's current system under President Xi Jinping and the CPC closely emulates the system of ancient China, because that's how China's been successfully governed for thousands of years.
    6
  4839. Decoupling from China is virtually impossible, given that China is home to 80-90% of the world's rare earth metal production. Rare earth metals are components in many familiar technologies, including smartphones, LED lights, and hybrid cars and various advanced technologies.
    6
  4840. Except perhaps the FIFA World Cup. The association tends to be riddled with fixed matches and illegal football betting.
    6
  4841. +RealHipHopManiac said "At the start of the 2nd Chinese Civil War the communists had way more men and industry goes to show that there are no facts to back your claims and ideology." After the Japanese surrender in 1945, the Communists had a strength of only 1,200,000 (July 1945) whereas the KMT had a strength of 4,300,000 (June 1946) so why do you claim that the Communists had way more men and industry? Source: Wikipedia: Chinese Civil War wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Civil_War
    6
  4842.  @davis7428  "Chinese officials walk around demanding things from people I don’t believe you." Which Chinese official are you referring to? Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi has been diplomatic during his visits to the US. But you can't say the same for how US officials like Anthony Blinken, John Kirby, Janet Yellen, etc visiting China and then making demands as if they were the kings and queens.
    6
  4843. Agreed. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like USA is a threat to global peace and stability.
    6
  4844. The H1N1 broke out in America and spread through the rest of the world, killing people even till today, but does the rest of the world demand payment from America?
    6
  4845.  @valenrn8657  The Minsk Agreement was meant to stop the fighting in Donbas, including a ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, release of prisoners of war, constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas.
    6
  4846.  @dwaynebarnaby3598  DF-41: World's longest range ICBM, with range of 15,000 km, surpassing US LGM-30 Minutemen range of 13,000 km DF-17: Carries Hypersonic Glide Vehicle (HGV) capable of attaining speeds above Mach 5 (5x speed of sound) DF-21: World's first operational Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile (ASBM) nicknamed "Carrier Killer" DF-26: Bigger variant of DF-21, with extended range. Nicknamed "Guam Killer" for its ability to reach Guam. JL-2: 2nd Gen Intercontinental Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) Able to reach U.S mainland. YJ-12: Sea-skimming supersonic missile (more stealthy approach). Can be launched by fighters and bombers.
    6
  4847. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US and its "allies).
    6
  4848.  @ihavetubes  George Orwell is just a writer of fiction, and his works are exaggerated in order to appeal to readers. But it doesn't necessarily mean that reality will follow in his example.
    6
  4849.  @bukujuku1541  "we have seen that democracy has worked in hundreds of examples" There are 192 countries in the world currently, of which 123 are "democracies" but majority of them are failing (in Africa for example) and many people dissatisfied with their leaders. Even before modern times, democracy has long history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, even Republic of Rome fell. Those proto-democracies didn't work and modern Western democracy only has a history of 100-200 years, so it doesn't necessarily mean it will be successful.
    6
  4850.  Cheng-Tso Hsieh  China already hosts the world's largest population at around 1.4 billion people, so China has no real need for immigrants. At the most, Chinese immigration policy admits the bare minimum number of immigrants and no more than absolutely necessary. Priority citizenship is given to overseas born Chinese returning to the homeland, or to foreigners that have something to contribute (i.e doctors, lawyers, scientists, researchers, businessmen, technopreneurs, etc) to China. Immigration brings with it social problems to locals, such as taking away jobs (whether real or perceived), displacing local populace, lack of assimilation into host country, and so on. Especially in America, where the immigration policy is so loose, that any foreigner who has a family or relative who is a U.S citizen, is already themselves applicable to become U.S citizens. That's why many foreigners marry Americans to gain citizenship, so that they can import their families over to USA, much to the disgruntlement of local Americans.
    6
  4851.  @FullPerspective  "China has also invaded islands in the South China Sea which does not belong to them. Not to mention Taiwan." The Republic of China 🇹🇼 (now Taiwan) claimed the South China Sea Islands in 1947 when they published the 11 Dash Line. Countries all over the world recognized the ROC's claim over the SCS islands, even the USA sent warships (i.e USS Decker) to help ROC liberate those islands from the Japanese. The USS Decker was renamed ROCS Tai-ping under the Chinese Navy, and one of the SCS islands was renamed Tai-ping Island in honor of this ship. So it indicates that the USA supports ROC's claims to SCS islands. Later in 1949, the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 came to power and instead of the 11 Dash Line (now claimed by Taiwan), PRC uses a 9 Dash Line, covering a smaller swath of the SCS. Also, the Vietnam PM Pham van Dong recognize that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were Chinese territory, in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. (Source: Wikipedia:1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai)
    6
  4852.  @FullPerspective  "The fact that China then proceeds to sent military to the islands without international justification, is not a act of peace." China had justification, it's because every year, the US Navy had been sending warships to within 12 Nautical Miles of the Paracel Islands and threatened Chinese territorial waters. 2023: USS Hopper sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands 2022: USS Benfold sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands 2021: USS John S McCain sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands 2020: USS Mustin sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands 2019: USS Wayne E Meyer sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands 2018: USS Higgins and USS Antietam sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands 2017: USS Chafee sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands 2016: USS Curtis Wilbur sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands 2015: USS Lassen sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands ... Therefore, China sees the need to step up its defense of the South China Sea.
    6
  4853.  @FullPerspective  Sweden is involved Mali War (2012~ongoing) Denmark and Norway have been involved in WW2 Iceland was invaded by British during WW2. Vanuatu and San Marino were involved in WW2. "I DONT HAVE TO MENTION A COUNTRY CHINA IS CURRENTLY AT WAR WITH FOR I HAVE NEVER CLAIMED CHINA IS CURRENTLY AT WAR!!!" Right, so that means China is currently at peace and not at war with any country.
    6
  4854. I'm Indian, and I believe Hindi-Chini bhai bhai ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
    6
  4855.  @djunior874  You said: "genocide and cultural destruction of the Uighurs," The population of Uighurs in Xinjiang in 2020 has actually grown by 16% since 2010. As for "cultural destruction", the Uighurs in Xinjiang celebrate Uighur festivals wearing traditional clothing (i.e the chapan and the doppa), eating Uighur cuisine (i.e naan flatbread and kebabs), singing and dancing and also playing traditional instruments (i.e dutar). What genocide and cultural destruction are you talking about?
    6
  4856. Agreed. Sad to see many ASEAN countries like Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore bought into the Western rhetoric and voted against Russia in the UN general assembly.
    6
  4857.  @bartonlee3594  Why do you twist the award speech given to Prof William Browns words? The last line should be "Our dear friend from afar, China is forever a home away from home for you, and we all love you ‘cause you always feel at home in China."
    6
  4858.  @cchannel7857  Look, even Wikileaks claims that there was No Bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square. Secret cables from the United States embassy in Beijing have shown there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square when China put down student pro-democracy demonstrations 22 years ago. (Source: The Telegraph: Wikileaks: no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square, cables claim)
    6
  4859.  @cchannel7857  According to Jay Matthews, reporter for The Washington Post, as far as can be determined from the available, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 and all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. Source: The Myth of Tiananmen: And the price of a passive press (By Jay Mathews)
    6
  4860.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Under Biden, there are certainly much more dialog between China and US." What dialogue are you talking about? The disastrous one at Alaska between Anthony Blinken and Yang Jiechi, where the Chinese officials flew halfway across the world to Alaska and were greeted with venomous accusations? At least Trump had his Phase One Trade talk with China in which both President Xi and Trump reached a consensus for China to buy American agricultural produce, but the new Biden Administration don't seem to care about a new trade deal. And Biden kept Trump's tarrifs without change, so how is Biden a better choice? Speaking of working on nuclear proliferation, it was Biden administration that's selling U.S nuclear submarines to Australia as part of AUKUS (snubbing France in the process) in an obvious attempt to contain China's rise, so how is Biden a better choice?
    6
  4861.  @henrytep8884  You said China will have to secure the sea route, but why is it whenever Chinese vessels patrol the South China Seas, they get a bad portrayal in the media? Shouldn't the media apply fair coverage of vessels patrolling the maritime trade routes? Also, China is investing and building an overland trade route in the form of the Belt and Road Initiative as an alternative to the maritime sea route.
    6
  4862.  @amc3463  No, it's you that want to fight Russia to the last drop of Ukrainian blood.
    6
  4863.  @rpg1663  Zelenskyy being Jewish doesn't automatically make Ukraine immune from supporting Nazis. Even in Nazi Germany there were Jewish Nazi collaborators that facilitated antisemitism. For example, George Soros is Jewish, yet he was a Nazi collaborator and he doesn't regret it (in his own words). Ukraine had been supporting ultra-nationalist neo-Nazis like the Azov Battalion carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Luhansk. Over the course of 8 years, some 13,000 people have been killed in those two regions. The Minsk Agreement was meant to stop the fighting, reach a ceasefire, facilitate withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, and institute constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas, but the agreements have been ignored. Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that was set in motion since the 2014 coup d'etat of Ukrainian President Yanukoyvch by the USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine.
    6
  4864.  @rpg1663  So you have no answer for a force that's larger than the PLA? Then how to make a comparison where China is attacked by a much larger force? And yes, the United States lost the 20-year Afghan War to a bunch of insurgents, after pouring trillions of dollars into the Afghan War effort. The democratically elected Afghan President Ghani abandoned the country with carloads of U.S cash, and the 300,000 strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban in weeks with minimal resistance. So if anything, this shows that wars aren't won by money and military equipment (as in the U.S case) yet why did you make the claim that "Wars are won by money and military equipment"? You said: "Russia has lost 10000 in less than a month" That's what Ukrainian media boasts, but how do you verify the figure? We won't know the true scale of the casualties until the conflict is over, and investigations are conducted. You said: "So in your perspective, Russia who can't go inside the capital and make the Ukraine's people, army, and government to surrender, is winning?!" No, my perspective is that Ukraine has literally been abandoned (Zelenskyy's own words) by NATO, since NATO isn't willing to put boots on the ground to defend Ukraine, and neither are they willing to impose a No-Fly Zone over Ukraine. Ukraine's admission into NATO is unlikely to be successful, because that would mean NATO is obliged to send troops to defend Ukraine if it were a member, and I can't see that happening in any case. So there's literally no way for Ukraine to turn the tide in its favor against Russia. You said: "The Blitzkrieg that Russia had planned is going really well right?" Putin has said that the military operation is going according to plan. As for whether it's a Blitzkrieg or not, Russia is taking extra precautions to minimize the civilian causalities as much as possible, that's why they aren't just leveling the capital and cities. But Zelenskyy is making it difficult by releasing prisoners and arming civilians with rifles, in order to inflict maximum civilian casualties. You said: "As for Zelenskyy asking for help, I believe it's quite easy to understand, since Ukraine is being invaded by a nuclear power country with a army 100 times bigger." But you claim Ukraine is winning, then why would NATO continue to send weapons to Ukraine if they were winning? Why would Zelenskyy call for a No-Fly Zone if Ukraine was winning? You said: "What a quick invasion and overthrown of the government, even with the president still in Kyiv lol." Doubts are beginning to surface of whether Zelenskyy is really in the capital Kiev. People have watched Zelenskyy's latest public address in Kiev, and it is suspected that he's possibly filming in front of a green screen of Kiev. The temperature of Kiev at night is freezing, below 0 ° C (32 ° F) and yet he's wearing a light coat and there's no vapor coming of his mouth. Search for "Zelenskyy Green Screen" to see what I mean. You said: "Fortunately not that strong though, and of course, with men (mostly kids) without moral to fight in a war against a country which didn't harm Russia" Zelenskyy literally just removed the age restriction on conscription, allowing kids to pick up weapons to fight and die for his refusal to surrender, yet you're complaining about "kids" in the Russian Army? You said: "It's pretty normal for the Ruble to have that short bullish behavior you've mentioned, but it has been going down once again during the last days." If NATO's strategy is to have the Ruble collapse, that appears to have failed, since the Ruble actually rose against the Dollar. Check it out, the Ruble has since regained some of its value after it's plunge, so it appears that the sanctions are backfiring on EU, UK and USA. You said: "You should check Ruble's value in the last 10 years, and see how healthy Russia economy is LOL. Also, you must be delusional if you think that Russia economy will not crumble." Russia's economy has not been destroyed for the past 10 years, despite pressure from US sanctions, so what makes you think the Russia economy does not know how to deal with sanctions? You think Putin did not prepare for sanctions from the West ahead of this military operation? You said: "Anyways, in one hand I feel quite surprised to see some Chinese people like you supporting separatists movements and illegal invasions, and war as whole." Because there has been shelling between Ukrainian Army, and the two republics, Donetsk & Luhansk for 8 years, of which over 13,000 people have been killed. From 2018 onward, around 80% of the civilians killed were in rebel-held regions in Donbas. Russia is not starting a war, they are putting an end to one that began in 2014 after the Ukrainian President Yanukoyvch was ousted in a coup d'etat orchestrated by the United States, and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine. You said: "Let's see if you are on the same page when the same happens from within China, and some areas start to have separatists movements and want to become independent just like is happening in Ukraine." You're comparing apples to oranges in this scenario. Ukraine and Russia have their history different from China's history with our provinces, so you can't just take what's happening in Ukraine and Russia and superimpose it onto China.
    6
  4865.  @nikoskn1252  Agreed. That's why Putin told Biden: "Don't be mad at the mirror if you are ugly." (Russian proverb).
    6
  4866. 精虫?
    6
  4867. 猴子在说话，谁听得懂可以翻译吗？
    6
  4868.  @tongeen  Communists achieved what the earlier Nationalist Kuomintang failed to achieve during the Republic of China (1912-1949) period, which is to unify all of China. The Nationalists tried for 37 years but did not managed to unify China. If not for the CPC, China today would most likely still be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong and unified country we are today.
    6
  4869.  @GodIsInHisHeaven  Another youtuber, 鍾翔宇 Xiangyu is also from Taiwan and he gives valuable insight about the Taiwan situation.
    6
  4870. European Union has two choices: 1) Continue buying cheap Russian gas in rubles, with sufficient supply. 2) Switch to buying expensive American LNG in dollars, with insufficient supply. ... Seems like a no brainer to me.
    6
  4871.  @SenorJuan2023  Also in another post you were calling out Putin for "arresting" the opposition, yet here you are calling for the same thing in the USA. Isn't it somewhat hypocritical?
    6
  4872. As a Chinese, I actually wanted Trump to win the 2020 re-election. Trump was helping make China great again, and Trump's re-election would have magnified the consequences in America by another 4 more years. Trump didn't care about China's internal affairs like Hong Kong or Xinjiang, he was interested in getting his trade deal done. Although he started the US-China trade war and slapped tariffs on China, the Biden Administration did not remove Trump's tariffs, so it makes no difference. In other words, Trump's re-election in 2020 would result in short-term pain for China yes. But it would magnify the consequences in USA by 4 more years, resulting in a long-term gain for China.
    6
  4873.  @madrigale6396  In China where resides 60% of the total world wide Mongolian population, Mongolian script is still official used as the exclusively legitimate script to write Mongolian language. In Outer Mongolia, the Mongolian script is not used as often they use Cyrillic script adopted from Russian language. The old script has now become a kind of heritage script. Children in Mongolia are taught to read and write it but it plays very little part in everyday life. As a consequence, most Mongolians are very poor at reading the traditional script. They read very slowly and haltingly, and would be hard put to actually read a story, let alone a book, written in the script. They would find it even harder to write it since it has many idiosyncratic spellings. What they wrote would be rife with errors. There are, of course, some people who are devoted to the script, but they are a minority.
    6
  4874.  @jp95js  President Xi Jinping never stated that he wants CPC to rule Taipei. President Xi actually offered to extend the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy to include Taiwan. This means Taiwan can keep their political system and their elections, only that it fully embrace the idea that Taiwan is part of China under the 1C2S policy. But Taiwan rejected this offer and did not offer a counter proposal of their own.
    6
  4875.  @NubbinzGaming  Why should China become democracy? India is world's largest democracy and it still has corruption. Corruption is universal phenomena, and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping there are ongoing anti-corruption campaigns to crack down on graft in the communist party. But when is a the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption crackdown? Hilary Clinton is corrupt politician, and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his presidential campaign. But after Trump became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    6
  4876. +Narendra Modi China's DF-41 ICBM has operational range between 12,000 km to 15,000 km, making the DF-41 the world's longest range missile, surpassing the range of the US LGM-30 Minuteman which has a reported range of 13,000 km. With such long range ICBM, why does PLA need to worry about the Himalayas posing as an obstacle?
    6
  4877.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "They are definitely NOT colonial mindset. I have no idea where Shenzhou was coming from." I have already elaborated in detail, which part do you not understand? Who partitioned India if not Britain? Who drew up India's borders, if not Britain? The answer is staring you in the face, but because of colonial mentality, you just overlook the true cause of the divisions in South Asia.
    6
  4878. Before I went to sleep, my wife was complaining to me: "This Russia is such a bad country, if Ukraine wants to join NATO, it is their business and freedom, Russia has no right to intervene. This is just an excuse for Russia to invade Ukraine." I said nothing, got out of bed and went to the kitchen, before returning to bed with knife in my hand. I told my wife: "Let's go to sleep" Upon seeing the knife, my wife sat up abruptly and looked at me with wide eyes. "What are you doing? Sleeping with a knife?!" she exclaimed. I replied: "Don’t worry about it, let’s go to sleep. Besides, me sleeping with a knife is none of your business and it is my freedom." My wife said: "You're crazy! How can I sleep when you are lying next to me with a knife? What if you accidentally cut me?" I replied: “Well, you don’t even trust your own husband, how can you expect Russia to trust Ukraine? Sleeping with a knife is like Ukraine joining the NATO." .... An anonymous analogy taken off Weibo.
    6
  4879.  @idleking31  The journalist even talked to two men from Kashgar and they blatantly show their full faces and did not disguise their voices. She even interviewed the Kindergartener girl and did not distort her voice so why did VICE News only distort the mysterious "Uighur" voice from on board the train? Is it to manufacture their own "evidence" to paint a negative picture of Xinjiang?
    6
  4880. Fantastic that you got Pascal Coppens on your show. Many Westerners tend to take a black & white view of issues, where's the Chinese view is perhaps more nuanced. It's like the Yin Yang symbol ☯ where there is a small white dot in the black space, and a small black dot in the white space. It's all about balance of opposing forces.
    6
  4881. Before I went to sleep, my wife was complaining to me: "This Russia is such a bad country, if Ukraine wants to join NATO, it is their business and freedom, Russia has no right to intervene. This is just an excuse for Russia to invade Ukraine." I said nothing, got out of bed and went to the kitchen, before returning to bed with knife in my hand. I told my wife: "Let's go to sleep" Upon seeing the knife, my wife sat up abruptly and looked at me with wide eyes. "What are you doing? Sleeping with a knife?!" she exclaimed. I replied: "Don’t worry about it, let’s go to sleep. Besides, me sleeping with a knife is none of your business and it is my freedom." My wife said: "You're crazy! How can I sleep when you are lying next to me with a knife? What if you accidentally cut me?" I replied: “Well, you don’t even trust your own husband, how can you expect Russia to trust Ukraine? Sleeping with a knife is like Ukraine joining the NATO." .... An anonymous analogy taken off Weibo.
    6
  4882.  @blafonovision4342  "神州 Shenzhou What I do not understand: the PRC issued a challenge to the USA for global supremacy." Since when did PRC issued such a challenge to the US for global supremacy?
    6
  4883.  @blafonovision4342  "神州 Shenzhou well whatever the USA is doing on trade barriers, it needs higher ones." The fact that the US is the most protectionist country in world, yet it has the gall to claim China is not following global free market principles?
    6
  4884. Stalemate? Crimea is still part of the Russian Federation. Two new republics (Donetsk and Luhansk) have now joined Russia. Cities like Mariupol, Bakhmut, Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, are now part of Russia. And it looks as Avdiivka is soon going to belong to Russia too. How is this a stalemate?
    6
  4885. When Americans vote for either the Democrats or the Republicans, it seems that whichever party wins only represents around 50% of Americans, not 100% of Americans. The Democrats represent one aspect of Americans, while the Republicans represent another aspect, and neither party truly represents America as a whole, that's why America is divided. Whereas in China, believe it or not, the Communist Party of China has to represent all of China because there is no other party. The CPC has to represent the poor Chinese, the working Chinese, the rural Chinese, basically every aspect of China. If anything goes wrong, the blame falls on the CPC shoulders, that's why government officials are always under stress and pressure to perform and meet the people's demands.
    6
  4886.  @ryancrystal3607  About child labor in China, there are some poor families with only elderly or sick adults and lack a working adult providing income. In such cases, wouldn't it be good if any able-bodied child work and receive appropriate pay to support their families?
    6
  4887.  @sabinereynaudsf  So instead of stepping up their solar power production, the EU's response is to impose tariffs on Chinese EVs? Why didn't they just impose a blanket tariff on all EVs, instead of only on those coming from China?
    6
  4888. Western countries have been polluting the Earth since 200-300 years ago when the Industrial Revolution started. China only industrialized in the last 40 years in comparison.
    6
  4889.  @MarkYeung1  Honestly speaking China's propaganda sucks and clearly needs improvement. Hardly anyone believes Chinese media, even though they present data and statistics. Whereas American propaganda is very effective. Almost everyone believe what American MSM says, even when it's unsubstantiated by proof.
    6
  4890. Modern day democracy only has a history of around 100-200 years, and it's not guaranteed to be successful in the long run. The closest ancient democratic equivalent would probably be the Republic of Rome, and even that empire eventually crumbled. What we are witnessing now is the same thing happening to the U.S with the decline of Western democracy.
    6
  4891. Peng Shuai wants to keep a low profile that's why she's been avoiding the public eye. But the WTA is behaving like the paparazzi and demanding that she appear in public to bare her private affairs for all the world to see.
    6
  4892. India's weapons are actually imported from overseas. Whereas China can manufacture more weapons, ammunition, tanks and fighter jets to replenish losses, India would have to purchase more military equipment from USA and Russia, and these countries can always increase the price during times of war.
    6
  4893. Many South East Asians countries took a stance against Russia in the recent UN vote, such as Singapore and Malaysia.
    6
  4894.  @robezy0  But there is possibility of asymptomatic infection (meaning you don't display any obvious symptoms, despite contracting the virus) so you may feel fine, but unknowingly infect others by going outside.
    6
  4895. China is striving to improve on it's flaws. Whereas the USA rather complain about China than improve their own flaws.
    6
  4896.  @MarkYeung1  Canada has yet to achieve independence from the US.
    6
  4897.  @SivaSiva-oc3jf  "神州 Shenzhou just saying bro. Chill" Do I sound upset?
    6
  4898.  @xir...  Why are you accusing me of being 50 cents? When did I ever said anything about the Chinese Communist Party here in this thread?
    6
  4899.  @truenorthstrongandfree3699  About the One Child Policy, in the past China was still dirt-poor country, suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems at that time. Why allow families in China to raise multiple kids, only for them to starve to death, succumb to childhood diseases, and having not enough food, not enough hospitals, and not enough schools to send them all to? Why not make families focus all available resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood, and get him into a good school? According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 (statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china ). This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Look at India, world's 2nd largest population country, and India is suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems that China once suffered from in the past. Indian children are starving, suffering from malnutrition, succumbing to childhood diseases, not attending school, because poor Indian families are unable to feed their numerous kids, send them to hospitals or send them all to school.
    6
  4900.  @GSP-76  That's why US is attempting to transfer TSMC's wafer fabrication plants to USA. Once the transfer is complete, the strategic value of the island to the US is no more.
    6
  4901.  @shmuelba1  Judaism is a religion not an ethnicity. You can't mix both, because non-ethnic Jewish people can always convert to Judaism. Then how can you make a comparison between a peoples (Arabs) with a religion (Judaism)?
    6
  4902. Just watch a Big Mac advertisement before ordering one for yourself, and you can find that the actual product isn't the same as what's being advertised.
    6
  4903.  @io2068  Seems like all you do is look down China's achievements that's all.
    6
  4904. Israel dropped more than 25,000 tons of ordnance on Gaza since Oct 7, which is the equivalent of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
    6
  4905. Even if on possibility that Biden himself is friendly to China, a significant majority of the American populace won't stand for Biden going soft on China, the anti-China sentiment in USA is just too rampant.
    6
  4906.  @kairussell7372  People clearly aren't equal. Among the races, Asians are often stereotyped as good at math but have small wieners while Africans are well endowed and so on.
    6
  4907.  @Yellow1964  China today is following "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics" under President Xi Jinping, so what makes you think China isn't socialist?
    6
  4908.  @petersinclair3997  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country, where even the previous KMT (under Chiang) failed for 37 years as the Republic of China 🇹🇼. Taiwan is clearly part of Chinese history, just look up the map of Qing Dynasty China and the island is part of Chinese territory.
    6
  4909. Westerners been polluting the environment for 300 years since the Industrial Revolution in 1700s, but they don't seem to care about the environment. On the other hand China only industrialized 40 years ago, and already, China is producing more renewable energy than Western countries.
    6
  4910. Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    6
  4911.  @SenorJuan2023  The survey in Russia was conducted by the reputable Levada Center, an independent non-government organization based in Moscow. In the 1990s, the agency's polls gained a reputation for being very reliable.
    6
  4912.  @simunlimun6838  So since there's no 100% approval rating, what happens to the 15% and 10% that disapprove of Putin and Xi respectively? Doesn't it render your whole argument that "no-one in allowed to criticize" wrong?
    6
  4913. Trump's tariffs aren't going to last forever. Eventually President Trump will have to step down when his term is over, and the next U.S president might just start reversing Trump's policies and lift the trade war, thus restoring US-China trade relations to their previous pre-tradewar levels. President Xi abolished the term limits, so he'll be able to guide China into the future, long after Trump's tariffs are gone.
    6
  4914.  @MarkYeung1  Sri Lanka's foreign debt as of April 2021 is: -47% Market Borrowings -13% Asian Development Bank -10% Japan -10% China -9% World Bank -2% India -9% Other ... Source: Department of External Resources, Sri Lanka So China isn't the main cause of Sri Lanka's economic woes. You said: "The war in Ukraine and worldwide inflation affects many nations, but it is not the reason for the Sri Lanka debt crisis." Then could you explain why is it Sri Lanka is experiencing economic woes during this period of global inflation and Russo-Ukraine conflict?
    6
  4915. China is already the 3rd country in the world to send people to space, when Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by Chinese space program on board the Shenzhou-5 spacecraft. But maybe one day, Chinese people can be like India.
    6
  4916.  @yb4x335  You said: "Don't compare Nato n brics." I'm not comparing. I'm rejecting one while supporting the other.
    6
  4917.  @TheReubstar  China is removing mosques on Chinese soil, while other countries like America are allowing Muslims to build mosques on American soil, in Spotsylvania country, Virginia for example. Video: Anti-Muslim ranters ganged up on a Muslim man at a town hall meeting youtube.com/watch?v=INy4gaUrCL4
    6
  4918.  @carynmartin6053  China follows a dynamic zero covid policy and the lockdowns are meant to prevent our hospitals from being overrun with cases. And the food shortage was merely a problem of distributing the food and it has been cleared up.
    6
  4919.  Priya Jaya  You Indians love Chinese products like smartphones. Here's a list of Top 10 Most Popular Smartphone Companies in India. Top 10 Most Popular Smartphone Companies in India 1. Samsung (South Korean) 2. Xiaomi (Chinese) 3. OnePlus (Chinese) 4. Apple (American) 5. Vivo (Chinese) 6. Oppo (Chinese) 7. Lenovo (Chinese) 8. LG (South Korean) 9. Nokia (Finnish) 10. HTC (Chinese) ... Source: Top 10 Most Popular Smartphone Companies in India walkthroughindia.com/hot-trends/top-10-most-popular-smartphone-companies-in-india/
    6
  4920.  @MarkYeung1  It's actually thanks to the Hong Kong National Security Law that order has been restored to Hong Kong after a year of protest and riot in 2019. The Hong Kong extradition bill was proposed because of a certain incident. A Hong Kong guy named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, and stuff her body in her suitcase, before flying back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice for his crime, but Hong Kong has no extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to Hong Kong extradition laws. Do the HK protestors even know what they are protesting for? Have they read the bill and understood its contents in their entirety?
    6
  4921.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou The National Security Laws resulted in complete loss of freedoms which was guaranteed under the one country two systems under Basic Law." I read Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 (香港基本法第二十三條) and the National Security Law actually has been a long time coming, since Article 23 states that Hong Kong shall enact laws to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government, and that's precisely what the Hong Kong National Security Law is all about. So Beijing is not violating Hong Kong National Law, because Hong Kong needs to enact a national security law as per Article 23.
    6
  4922.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "100000 plus people left Hong Kong permanently last year." Because many Hong Kong couples are unable to find affordable housing and settle down in Hong Kong. Because the Hong Kong property tycoons control the real estate and jack up land prices to be beyond the price range of many new Hong Kong couples, so some of them decide to leave the island. The Hong Kong government doesn't do much to address the housing shortage, because they receive income from taxing land sales, since they can't tax businesses, so they just let the land prices rise. Additionally, during the 2019 Hong Kong riots, many Hong Kong rioters commit crimes like breaking into stores, looting them, setting stores on fire, beating up people all while under the cover of masks, so some of these Hong Kong rioters now fear the law catching up to their acts and they seek to escape Hong Kong to elsewhere. You said: "Multiple newspapers and media were forced to close last year due to the national security law." Many of these newspapers and media were found to be supporting acts of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government, so under the Hong Kong National Security law, this no longer allowed. I mean, every state has it's own National Security law, whether USA, UK, Australia, Canada, etc, so why not Hong Kong SAR as well?
    6
  4923.  @MarkYeung1  I already explained it. Apply Daily newspaper is owned by Hong Kong tycoon Jimmy Lai, who's been found guilty and sentence to jail for secession, subversion and colluding with foreign powers, then can't China shutdown this Hong Kong newspaper? From your words, you appear to apply biased double standards when talking about China and the Western Democracies. Since you support the United Kingdom revoking the broadcasting license of CGTN, then can't China freeze the assets of Apply Daily newspaper after their CEO been found to be colluding with foreign powers in secession and subversion activities?
    6
  4924.  @golazo  But China is not at war with any country, so what's your point? Look at the warmonger USA being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Yemen War, etc and you're labelling China as evil here?
    6
  4925.  @neil6958  Why am I a bot? For pointing out that China in Focus channel is affiliated with the Epoch Media Group, literally Falun Dafa media? And I showed you pictures of "nail houses" (钉子户) and you just claim "sentimentality" (which I disproven above) and because you can't refute my points so you start calling me a bot?
    6
  4926.  @lucdubois3927  If you want to talk about prison populations, then it's the USA that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate, and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity, that the U.S government sometimes releases convicts back onto the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons.
    6
  4927. Brian did mention that Chinese company SMIC had a chip breakthrough in fabricating 7nm chips for semiconductors, despite U.S sanctions and possibly advancing it's production technology by two generations.
    6
  4928. The transition to a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices from the uni-polar world dominated by one voice (that of the U.S and its allies) would not be complete without an alternative to the USD.
    6
  4929.  @petehagen8638  The Nazis promoted racial supremacy, considered Jews as an inferior race and Nazi propaganda is littered with demonized caricatures of Jews depicting their inferior status in Nazi society. So if China was truly behaving like Nazi Germany back, then we should be seeing demonization of the ethnic minorities in Chinese media. But I watched CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV, and they actually showcase ethnic minority cultures, cuisine, festivals, traditional clothing, traditional instruments, song and dance. If anything, China is doing the opposite of what Nazi Germany did with antisemitism and China is actually promoting ethnic minority culture instead of demonizing it like what Hitler did with the Jews.
    6
  4930. If the clone is better than the original, then what's wrong with preferring Chinese "clones"?
    6
  4931.  @HannarrMontannarr  said "The sooner the chinese communist party falls the better." You seem to be deeply influenced by facts, then why do you want the CCP to fall? China is currently the world's 2nd largest economy and China's collapse would send economic shockwaves throughout the rest of the world and send global economies into recession, as Chinese companies fire their employees and close down, and Chinese investment dries up. Therefore, isn't it in your country's best interests to keep the CCP going? So as to avoid the above described catastrophic scenario?
    6
  4932.  munchkin42  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    6
  4933.  @saikauleung1198  Yes, they know so little, yet they act like they know more about China than Chinese people, and that Chinese lack information about the rest of the world.
    6
  4934. It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. But it's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many Westerners (but not all) to fathom.
    6
  4935.  @fantared5263  So you told China to piss off over a hypothetical example of Chinese troops and warships in the Solomon Islands (when even you admit there are currently none), yet you seemingly permit the U.S warships sailing to within 12NM of Chinese territorial waters in the Paracel Islands? The U.S has been doing this year after year, here's a list: 2022: USS Benfold sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands. 2021: USS John S McCain sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands. 2020: USS Barry sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands. 2019: USS Wayne E. Meye sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands. 2018: USS Higgins and USS Antietam sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands. 2017: USS Stethem sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands. 2016: USS Decatur sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands. 2015: USS Lassen sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands.
    6
  4936.  @LoveWatchingNDEs  So I take it that you only think 1 step ahead at a time?
    6
  4937.  @Andy-P  Taiwan is clearly an example where economic growth was achieved under an authoritarian system. Democracy has nothing to do with it, so why adopt it at all? Same goes for mainland China. Without ever adopting Western style democracy, China transformed from a once poor, war-torn starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy (or world's largest by GDP PPP), the factory of the world (i.e Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. China is an engine driving economic growth, so how is it China doesn't offer hope, only despair? If Taiwan's economy becomes more integrated with the mainland, then the mainland's growth will also boost the stagnating Taiwanese economy.
    6
  4938.  @viveviveka2651  NASA has laid out its plan to decommission and deorbit the International Space Station (ISS) by 2031, which means China's Tiangong Space Station (天宫空间站) is predicted to remain the only station in orbit for the foreseeable future.
    6
  4939.  @rsavage-r2v  From my experience, sarcasm doesn't always translate well to text. People might not detect the sarcasm in your words so it's a good idea to deliberately exaggerate your sentences.
    6
  4940.  @旮旯北京  Hong Kong Police are doing the smart thing. The Hong Kong rioters expected the police to storm the barricades, so the police take no action and let the residents clean up the blockade.
    6
  4941.  @宋庆-i4m  Who is that person accusing that man of domestic violence? The USA? America has numerous domestic issues, gun violence, racial discrimination, kids are doing drugs, yet they want to complain about the domestic affairs of China? Even without concrete proof or evidence of genocide? Foreign policy should first start at home. Get domestic affairs in order, before complaining about other countries domestic issues.
    6
  4942. Here's an analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    6
  4943. China needs the pork anyway, so lifting the ban doesn't harm China. But Canada missed out on the opportunity to exert economic leverage, so too bad for Canada.
    6
  4944.  @bjrnhjortshjandersen1286  That's why I'm open to hearing out views from multiple perspectives, including those of Indians, Americans, Europeans, etc. But what I found is that many foreigners (but not all) tend to take a negative view of China even without setting foot in China and seeing what life is like here for themselves.
    6
  4945. Those "underground churches" aren't even properly registered under Chinese laws, so why should the government permit their existence in our lands? As long as you register yourself properly at the correct bureau as a Christian, then the authorities will pretty much leave you alone. Imagine if there are "underground mosques" promoting Islamic radicalism in your country that remain unregistered with your government.
    6
  4946.  @jtf873  Glad that you see the wisdom in my post.
    6
  4947.  @jtf873  The goal of Checkers is to clear the board of opponent pieces (i.e wipe out the enemy). The goal of Chess is to checkmate the opponent's King (i.e force their leader to surrender). The goal of Go (Weiqi 围棋) is to slowly and patiently build up assets to tip the balance of the game in one's favour.
    6
  4948.  @ryanwalters6184  In China, all land belongs to the state, which is a good thing because you don't want your own lands ending up under the ownership of foreign buyers right? Because who knows what they'll do with your land? Whereas in the West, you put your lands up for sale then can't Chinese buyers purchase them?
    6
  4949. Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can produce enough food, goods, houses, hospitals, schools, for EVERYONE on the planet! Yet we still have starving people, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, because capitalism means that the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." The Earth's resources are finite and capitalism seeks to exhaust its resources, whereas communism is dedicated to distributing resources according to needs.
    6
  4950. Many ancient civilizations, will blend some fantastical elements into their history, from Mesopotamia's Epic of Gilgamesh to India's epic The Mahabharata so likewise, China has some mythic stories to share as well. Its' this creative streak, that broaden our minds as human species and bring about the creation of video games for entertainment. If historical games are too accurate, it would be linear and unable to sell well if it is not entertaining enough.
    6
  4951.  @MarkYeung1  China is often not considered as a destination for them because of how it is portrayed in their media.
    6
  4952.  @cohendarwin5365  In the US, while you can change the govt, you can't change the policies. Whereas in China, while you can't change the government, you can change the policies.
    6
  4953.  @fcl3294  Since the Communist Party of China has shown to be extremely successful in governing China, then is there really a need to change the CPC drastically? Whereas Western political systems (US, UK, Canada, Australia,) aren't faring as well as China's communist government, then why can't Western political systems learn from China instead? Or is it Westerners are unable to tolerate a political system different from their own Western brand of democracy? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    6
  4954.  @xerozero976  Well, CPC does not acknowledge dual citizenship yes, and Cyrus Janssen is not a citizen of the People's Republic of China, so what seems to be the problem? Cyrus Janssen has a German name, was born in America and is currently living in Canada, so what has Chinese citizenship even got to do with him?
    6
  4955.  @smoochie3331  Please explain what's wrong with receiving money from Chinese entities? If Cyrus Janssen previously worked for a Chinese company (say a golfing company) then what's wrong Cyrus receiving money from Chinese businesses?
    6
  4956.  @xerozero976  Previous under Republic of China 🇹🇼, China was dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today under People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. China has allocated a 330 million yuan ($47 million) disaster relief fund to help farmers and agricultural production in southern provinces.
    6
  4957.  @smoochie3331  It's a norm? Then did you know that so-called Western "think tanks" are actually funded by "tank-makers"? The Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) is funded by the US military-industrial complex in order to paint China as "the enemy" and get countries to buy US weapons.
    6
  4958.  @fcl3294  "The CCP has killed far more people than Nazi Germany ever did." China was undergoing Chinese Civil War, of course Chinese were killing Chinese people. Just like during American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans. Or Vietnamese killing Vietnamese during Vietnam War. Or Koreans during Korean War or any civil war for that matter. But China today is currently the world's most populous country. Our population back in 1949 (when the Communists first took over) was 500 million, but has nearly tripled in size to 1.4 billion people today. Source: Population of China 1950—2021 macrotrends.net/countries/CHN/china/population And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    6
  4959.  @smoochie3331  You said: "When you receive money from someone, you tend to work for his interest." By your assumption, if Cyrus' message is apparently the same as the CPC's, which is "building bridges between China and the West", then what's wrong with spreading such a positive message? If your assumption is true, then what's wrong with CPC promoting the same message as Cyrus, of "building bridges, not walls"?
    6
  4960.  @dagsmoko3889  So what's Meng's alleged crime? Did Huawei CFO violate US sanctions on Iran? But Canada also violated US sanctions on Iran, but USA choose to close one eye on Canada, but not China?
    6
  4961.  @cacritic28  Who would have thought that drinking cups of coffee can make one speak Mandarin fluently.
    6
  4962.  @unknownfuture4589  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    6
  4963. Beijing is going down in history as the first city to host both the Summer Olympics (in 2008) as well as the Winter Olympics (in 2022).
    6
  4964.  @fcl3294  "神州 Shenzhou Why is Charter 08 blocked in the PRC.?" Because it's a culmination of Liu Xiaobo's views espousing Western Imperialism. He believed that every country in the world has to become westernized and that all of humanity has to become Westernized, with absolutely no room for other cultures, other systems and forms of government to exist. How much more Western Imperialist can he be? Have you actually read his works?
    6
  4965.  @fcl3294  You said: "Please explain the admiration for the free and open government of Taiwan." Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party Kuomintang rule for more than half its life. For decades, the KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist and Chiang kai-Shek was a dictator who jailed/executed dissidents and political rivals in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖). The 228 Incident of 1947, in which the KMT killed at least 18,000 Taiwanese civilians in response to a popular uprising and also summarily executed many local political and intellectual elites. Chiang also imposed martial law in Taiwan for 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: Wikipedia: Martial law in Taiwan, White Terror (Taiwan) Yet under authoritarian KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 and 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 and 1986 at 6.9%. The gross national product grew by 360% between 1965 and 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 and 1986. Source: Wikipedia: Taiwan Miracle After Western style democracy was introduced to Taiwan (because the U.S threatened to cut off sales of weapons to the island if political reforms were not made), Taiwan's economy has since stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are seeking job opportunities overseas, such as in mainland China or in places like Singapore.
    6
  4966.  @hyc1266  Agreed. Taiwan was previously known as one of the Four Asian Tigers/Dragons, while under the authoritarian, single-party KMT leadership. But since then, Taiwan's progress became ruined when Western democracy was introduced to the island and today, Taiwan is stagnating under the DPP party. Even worst, Taiwan parliament members can become violent during meetings, throwing furniture and water balloons (they actually prepared water balloons for parliament?) and footage of Taiwan parliament fights is available on YT. In contrast to Taiwan's government, the 20th National Congress session in the mainland is conducted in a proper, orderly manner.
    6
  4967.  @AdamSahr-cj4kf  Singapore's strategy is to be friendly with as many countries as possible.
    6
  4968. It's funny how Cyrus is keenly aware of Western MSM deliberately painting China in a negative light to their audiences, but has he considered that the Western MSM might portray Russia in a same negative light to their audiences? I implore Cyrus to seek out information from the other side.
    6
  4969.  @hamiorg  There's also "white-washing" where characters of Asian descent are being portrayed by Caucasian actors/actresses. For example, Scarlet Johanson portraying the protagonist in The Ghost in the Shell.
    6
  4970.  @andraslippai3169  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China, and incorporated those lands into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors did the same with Tibet and incorporated it into Qing Dynasty China. Tibet briefly broke free of China in 1912 but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951 when the 17 Point Agreement was signed.
    6
  4971. If they were both the most intelligent and diligent people on the entire planet (as well as having the largest populations in the world) then why such discrepancy between the two countries?
    6
  4972.  @BSnicks  All I'm saying that if George Yeo doesn't want Singapore to join this Chinese commonwealth that he himself proposed, what are the chances of Taiwan agreeing to this commonwealth idea?
    6
  4973.  @yslee1401  Very imaginative! Putting Meng under house arrest protects her from the CPC's clutches! Of course! Why didn't I think up such a conspiracy theory myself!
    6
  4974.  @yslee1401  Why do you care where Meng is housed? The 2 Canadians have different crimes, of course the punishment is more severe what has being in jail or being under house arrest even got to do with the issue?
    6
  4975. Chinese government and workers built brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan) in Wuhan in 10 and 1600-bed hospital (Leishenshan) in Wuhan in 12 days. Yet those China-haters called them "containers" Now here USA erected "tents" to treat their patients.
    6
  4976. @BrainYtreeX What's wrong with Brian's audience? Here you have an opportunity to present your arguments and debate topics in the comment section, but you choose not to do so. Whereas on the mainstream western channels, the comments section are so one sided against China.
    6
  4977.  @Brolaeggerdk  Photographs and videos show that the rocket part faces the northeast, which means that the missile may have arrived from the southwest, which is the direction of Ukrainian controlled territory, such as Dobropillia. So it's possible that this attack on Kramatorsk was orchestrated by Ukrainian forces themselves, not by Russia.
    6
  4978.  @squashype9838  Tochka-U is a Soviet Era short range missile, it couldn't have been fired from Russia itself, neither does the Russian Army have any of such missiles. It's the Ukrainian army that still uses such missiles.
    6
  4979.  @libra6492  "神州 Shenzhou You said it "may have". You are not an expert leave it for them." Well, are you an expert then? Then why are you jumping to conclusions about Putin, Russian history and so on?
    6
  4980. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multi-polar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the uni-polar world, dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US and its "allies").
    6
  4981. Besides supercomputers, China is home to the world's largest high speed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkasen hi-speed railway in terms of track length. During Chinese New Year, people in China returning to home province to celebrate reunion dinners, used to take many days of travel to reach their home provinces. Now with high speed railway, the commuting time has been reduced from days to mere hours.
    6
  4982.  @MarkYeung1  Tell that to the Canadian truckers protesting about vaccine mandates.
    6
  4983.  @perrychrispy1  What word games are you playing? An "unofficial" British colony? That means Britain officially stole Hong Kong from China and it was only signed some treaty in 1898 AFTER blatantly stealing that territory from 1841. Otherwise, what was Hong Kong from 1841-1898, if not stolen Chinese territory by the British?
    6
  4984.  @perrychrispy1  Those Hong Kong protestors are mostly students, and they haven't even graduated from school, yet they already think they know the best way to govern Hong Kong? Even better than Hong Kong's leaders? Their minds haven't even matured to the realities of politics, so yet they think they know better than their leaders how to govern Hong Kong?
    6
  4985.  @Andrew-ib7gs  If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    6
  4986.  @JaydenGK2004  Hamas only dug up water pipes after they've gone dry after the water supply was turned off by Israel. These were basically empty water pipes we're talking about, why don't you blame the one responsible for cutting off the water supply in the first place?
    6
  4987. By "local biker gangs", you mean the U.S? In that case, those biker gangs certainly aren't local, and would the locals tolerate the invasion and seizing of their inventory by foreign pirates?
    6
  4988.  Gaylord Manlove  Have you actually been to Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region and see how prosperous it is? I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience) Video: youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA
    6
  4989. @mark yeung But Ukraine cannot even defend against Russia.
    6
  4990. +Dr ROLFCOPTER! Dr. Sun Yat-sen had ideals, but ideals alone won't unify China. Under the KMT administration, Republic of China was divided into numerous provinces, each ruled by its own warlord, and even Tibet broke free of China. Dr. Sun tried to get the Western powers help to unify China, but the Westerners laughed at China's attempt to copy democracy from them. The Westerners even gave away China's Shandong province away to Japan after Germans captured the province during WW1, even when China was part of the Allies during WW1. In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realizing a unified China. But then China was finally unified under Mao Zedong (which the previous KMT administration failed to achieve) If not for Mao Zedong, China today would be largely divided and fighting amongst ourselves and because China is unified, that China can finally progress and become strong.
    6
  4991.  @juanreese6933  China has no real desire to expand further. As long as the United States respects mainland China's sovereignty over Taiwan Island and the South China Sea islands, then it's possible to come to some form of agreement.
    6
  4992.  @juanreese6933  Why should the U.S and its so-called "allies" (if they can even be called such) be allowed to dominate the world and not China? In the 19th century, Britain was a superpower, but was eventually overtaken by the U.S in the 20th century. In this 21st century, if China can eventually surpass the U.S, then can't Chinese work to achieve this eventual goal? Nobody said that the West has to be dominant all the time.
    6
  4993.  @juanreese6933  You said: "Asians as whole belong in Asia as there cultures are vastly different from the European ideology." Exactly. So the West should stop interfering with affairs in Asia, such the South China Seas, or Taiwan island. Yet why is the U.S sending warships and aircraft carriers halfway across the world to the South China Sea, and why NATO making Taiwan into one of their concerns?
    6
  4994. Here's western economists headlines about China's economy since 1990. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet the fact is that China's economy grew 5% in 2024. You're telling me you're believing all those headlines about China?
    6
  4995. Gloria Hahn What makes you think that you know how the social credit system works? China is a meritocracy and people are rewarded based on their performance. In the West there are people jobless people who are living on government welfare and collecting food stamps, instead of finding a job, while the people who actually working pay taxes to support such a system. China's social credit system can hopefully help to remove this problem by encouraging positive behaviour and discouraging unproductive behaviour.
    6
  4996.  @andrenogueira5058  The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Source: Wikipedia: Seventeen Point Agreement So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet, then how did China violate international law?
    6
  4997. About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    6
  4998.  Darius Green  Do Canadians even know the occupations of the two Michaels? Whereas everyone knows Meng Wanzhou is the Huawei CFO.
    6
  4999.  @adamperdue3178  In 2017, there was a global survey by World Economic Forum, to determine "Which countries are on the right track, according to their citizens?". The survey results were as follows: China: 10% (Wrong Track), 90% (Right Direction) Saudi Arabia: 20% (Wrong Track), 80% (Right Direction) India: 24% (Wrong Track), 76% (Right Direction) Russia: 42% (Wrong Track), 58% (Right Direction) ... Canada: 50% (Wrong Track), 50% (Right Direction) * Canada represents the 50/50 mark ... Australia: 55% (Wrong Track), 45% (Right Direction) Japan: 57% (Wrong Track), 43% (Right Direction) Great Britain: 63% (Wrong Track), 37% (Right Direction) United States: 65% (Wrong Track), 35% (Right Direction) ... Source: World Economic Forum So it appears that many of the people in China polled think China is on the right track, and that the Chinese government is carrying out the will of the people. Whereas in the United States States, it seems that many think America is on the wrong track, that the U.S government isn't carrying out the people's will. Would it fair to say that China is more democratic than the U.S based on the survey results then?
    6
  5000.  @ChiefCabioch  "神州 Shenzhou my question was multiple questions, you chose the silliest one ." So you're admitting that your own question was silly? Why are you asking silly questions then?
    6
  5001.  @kaiserumaru  "To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal."
    6
  5002.  @johnchow8372  China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: Wikipedia: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities
    6
  5003.  @joeyxiaoqio8867  "Singapore which strikes perfect balance from many super powers by maintaining neutrality" Singapore literally slapped sanctions on Russia, how's that maintaining neutrality?
    6
  5004. Philippines has been long time old ally of USA, but what did USA ever do for Philippines? The Obama Administration prohibit sale of weapons to Philippines, because USA was "concerned" with Philippines human rights violations, regarding Duterte's dealing with drug lords. To which, Duterte responded with "F**k Obama"
    6
  5005.  @augustuswoods4548  About the so-called invasion of Tibet, Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty China and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Source: Map of Yuan Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/04/yuan.jpg Source: Map of Qing Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/06/f114660d2bf5452994135c4c.gif So how is China invading our territory of Tibet?
    6
  5006.  @iloveporkandchicken4718  In Indonesia, world's largest Muslim population country, don't the Indonesian government also teach Chinese in Indonesia their language, Bahasa Indonesia? Suharto even banned all expressions of Chinese culture through language, religion, and traditional festivals and the ethnic Chinese were pressured to adopt Indonesian-sounding names.
    6
  5007. The population of Uighurs in China has nearly quadrupled from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    6
  5008.  @marysylvie2012  You've been to China 3 times? Which part of China did you visit?
    6
  5009.  @Bitchslapper316  "神州 Shenzhou He's implying that Nazism is a legitimate reason for Russia to invade Ukraine." Didn't the Allies attack Germany during WWII citing Nazism as a legitimate reason to do so? The Ukrainian Nazi-collaborator, Stepan Bandera is still worshiped by many in Ukraine (but not all), and what Russia is trying to do is to de-Nazify the fascist breeding ground that is Ukraine. Putin had also wanted assurances that NATO would not expand eastward (i.e that Ukraine not be allowed to join NATO) and he made it clear on paper in February. Many NATO countries like France and Germany, were similarly reluctant to admit Ukraine into NATO (citing concerns over Ukraine government corruption) but they refused to put that down in writing in order to reassure Putin. After realizing that his words had fallen on deaf ears for years, Putin finally decided to act.
    6
  5010. The island is a piece on the chessboard between world powers.
    6
  5011. China shares land borders with 14 countries (the most neighbors in the world) -In 1964, North Korea and China signed border treaty -In 1991, Soviet Union and China signed border treaty -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed border treaty -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border treaty -In 1996, Kyrgyzstan and China signed border treaty -In 1915, Tajikistan and China signed border treaty -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border treaty -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed border treaty -In 1963, Nepal and China signed border treaty -In 1960, Myanmar and China signed border treaty -In 1992, Laos and China signed border treaty -In 1999, Vietnam and China signed border treaty ... Only India and Bhutan have not signed a border treaty with China. China has had 30 rounds of border talks with India and *25 *rounds of border talks with Bhutan, and still haven't settled the border dispute. Whatever the problem is, it's certain not from a lack of trying on China's part at least.
    6
  5012.  @11pke  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Whereas the U.S is involved in Afghan War, Iraq War, Ukraine War even in the 21st century.
    6
  5013.  @alexj7934  You said: "Don't let us get started on the atrocities committed by China in its recent history," Could you name some of these atrocities? According to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty
    6
  5014. Ted Cruz not only enjoys messing with with other countries, but also with American politics by supporting the January 6th Capitol Hill insurrectionists.
    6
  5015.  @jonathanhe7676  You asked: "Has America ever passed an anti-secession bill over militarily invading Hawaii?" I just Googled "U.S anti-secession bill" and it turns out that Texas cannot legally secede from the United States if they wanted to, due to historical and legal precedents. The Civil War played a very big role in establishing the power of the federal government and cementing that the federal government has the final say in these issues.
    6
  5016.  @jonathanhe7676  So you're admitting that Taiwan can't change their constitution even if they wanted to? That just goes to shows that Taiwan isn't independent if they don't even have sovereignty over their own constitution. Even Taiwan participating in the Olympics has to go by the name "Chinese Taipei" then it defeats your whole argument of Taiwan being independent after all.
    6
  5017.  @ngawangyoga9258  You overseas Tibetan living comfortably in lower attitudes outside of the harsh conditions of Tibetan Plateau, you in Paris get access to electricity for lighting, electronic devices to communicate, roads, railways, highways, bridges, then why can't Chinese modernise the life of Tibetans on the harsh Tibetan Plateau? You enjoy your comfortable modern life, then why can't China modernise Tibet and make life better for Tibetans? Here's another video of foreigner (Where's Poppy) visiting Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, China. Video: First Day in Lhasa, Tibet (By Where's Poppy) youtu.be/3WetplXVVUo
    6
  5018.  @ngawangyoga9258  Here's video of Tibetan female helicopter pilot showcasing beautiful Lhasa from the sky. Why can't Chinese bring modernity to Tibet? You think every Tibetan kid wants to grow up to be dirt-poor yak herder or Buddhist monk, is that it? Video: Tibetan female helicopter pilot shows Lhasa from the sky youtu.be/wyE6YjcPZHI Twenty-three-year-old Janre Yeshe comes from a family of herdsmen in Lhasa City's Damshung County in Tibet Autonomous Region. She was one of 28 Tibetans who succeeded in achieving their dream of being among the first Tibetan pilots to obtain a license. "I feel a sense of accomplishment when I take tourists to see Lhasa from the air," she says.
    6
  5019. This is a prime example of the Western PC culture, where every word mentioned has to be exactly "politically correct" else it might offend some minority group SJW.
    6
  5020. If it's a religious issue then why was the oldest church in Gaza bombed to ruins by the IDF?
    6
  5021.  @MarkYeung1  You have mistaken China with the USA. China has been urging the United States to stop blocking UN Security Council calls to ease tensions in Gaza Source: China urges US to back UN calls for Israeli-Palestinian ceasefire scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3133671/china-urges-us-back-un-calls-israeli-palestinian-ceasefire
    6
  5022.  @raymondhoffman3587  How can I be racist against my own fellow Chinese living in Hong Kong? I'm explaining how the "colonial mentality" results in the colonizer's ideas pervading the minds of people in former colonies, and that there needs to be "decolonization of the mind" among the people of Hong Kong that's all. You know who forcefully imposed their thoughts and ideas on others? The British colonizers when they colonized Hong Kong for over 150 years.
    6
  5023. Taiwan politics is more complex than that. The political parties of Taiwan are color coded, with BLUE representing parties in favor of eventual reunion with the mainland (such as KMT) and GREEN representing parties in favor of independence (such as DPP). Not everyone in Taiwan wants independence, and the stance can always change when different parties get elected.
    6
  5024. Which major country even recognise Taiwan as independent? Even president Trump, the most powerful man in the most powerful country, still acknowledged the One China Policy after a phone call from Chinese president Xi Jinping.
    6
  5025. The old Uighur neighborhoods are very old and rundown, so what Chinese government is doing is to modernize the region by building proper paved roads, installing running water, gas and electricity, streetlamps, and other modern amenities. Otherwise, you want the Uighurs to live in their poor derelict neighborhoods forever?
    6
  5026. Fun Fact: China's Forbidden City is the world's most visited palace seeing some 16 million visitors annually, more than double the number of visitors to India's Taj Mahal. Source: List of most visited palaces and monuments wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_visited_palaces_and_monuments
    6
  5027. In 2002, China had 0 km hi-speed rail track, but in 2019, China has over 38,207 km of high-speed railway track, (more than double the rest of the world combined!) Video: High-Speed Railway (HSR) Construction by Country (1965-2019) youtu.be/zkMnxJF22O8?list=PLZR7QFDVc72MMo7fUAT-IwpV08Ngb6L3D&t=120s Countries by High-Speed Railway Track 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. France (3,870 km) 4. Germany (3,596 km) 5. Japan (3,422 km) 6. Russia (2,026 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,997 km) 8. Italy (1,697 km) 9. South Korea (1,481 km) 10. Finland (744 km)
    6
  5028.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  While NATO and USA may be sending lethal aid to Ukraine, but once again, NATO and USA are not going to put boots on the ground to defend Ukraine. Also, does the Ukrainian military even have enough pilots capable of flying those MiG 29s? How are they going to deliver those MiGs? And even Zelenskyy himself lamented that Ukraine has been abandoned by the West, so if you disagree with the term abandonment, you can take it up with Zelenskyy himself.
    6
  5029. It's your funeral then, if you Filipinos don't want Chinese vaccine. China can always offer our vaccines to other developing countries that desperately need vaccine, why offer to ungrateful Filipinos? Did America offer to share their vaccines with Phillipines?
    6
  5030. The 2014 Crimea Referendum results revealed an overwhelming majority (96%) of Crimeans voted to join the Russian Federation.
    6
  5031.  @INTJ791  But since I am not the owner of this channel, what makes you think I have the power to censor your comment? And you're saying Cyrus Jannsen is online, read your comment and then censored it?
    6
  5032.  @INTJ791  But I am not the owner of this channel, why are you accusing me of somehow censoring your comment? I don't have control over who sees your comment, and you really think Cyrus is actively censoring your comment right now?
    6
  5033.  @MarkYeung1  It was Chiang kai-shek that was in charge of Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) until Mao Zedong proclaimed the founding of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949. Secondly, China stood a fighting chance against Imperial Japanese invaders and even the United States joined the war after Pearl Harbour was bombed. Whereas Ukraine has been literally abandoned by NATO (Zelenskyy's own words) and NATO isn't going to send troops to defend Ukraine nor honor their request for a No-Fly Zone over Ukraine. Ukraine's application to join NATO is unlikely to be successful, because that would mean NATO is obliged to send reinforcements to defend Ukraine if it were a member. So how is Zelenskyy going to win turn the tides against Russia?
    6
  5034. Red Scare and Yellow Peril too.
    6
  5035. Have you been to China before?
    6
  5036.  @arfajob4246  Simply look up China's home ownership rate and it's around 90%.
    6
  5037. China's interests would lie in surrounding and engulfing Mongolia back into our embrace during such hypothetical war scenario. But of course, during peacetime, a better approach is to continue doing business with Mongolia.
    6
  5038. +BH At least I provide basis for an argument, whereas you just claim it sucks? Why don't you come up with an argument of your own then?
    6
  5039.  @christopherhamlin6139  So you're admitting that the mainland is stopping Taiwan from joining the UN like an independent country can? That means you've proven Taiwan isn't independent after all.
    6
  5040.  @christopherhamlin6139  "神州 Shenzhou I'm just going with what the UN said." In 1971, the UN countries democratically voted to recognize the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 as China and to kick the Republic of China 🇹🇼 out of the UN. The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the UN General Assembly Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The poll results were: -76 voted in favor -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting ... Source: Wikipedia: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 Since the PRC won the vote with two-thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, and recognized the PRC as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" from the United Nations.
    6
  5041.  RIDIN’ HIGH 5150  About the Social Credit System, many foreigners often complain Chinese people spit in public, smoke in non-smoking areas, jump queues, disobey traffic rules, jay walk, drive on wrong side of the road, speed through red lights, etc when not all Chinese people are like that. We Chinese feel embarrassed that such bad people represent China overseas, so the government introduce social credit system to discourage such bad behaviour and promote better behaviour instead. This is a meritocratic system where good behaviour is rewarded and bad behaviour penalised. But if such people persist with bad behaviour, until their scores fall to become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisances of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again.
    6
  5042. Indonesian is world's largest Muslim population country and the Indonesian government persecuted Chinese in Indonesia by banning expressions of Chinese culture through language, religion, and traditional festivals, and the ethnic Chinese were pressured to adopt Indonesian-sounding names. But Western reporters don't care what happen to Chinese in other people's countries.
    6
  5043.  @jso2073  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    6
  5044.  @zackk4969  You said: "The Chiinese search engine, Baidu, is a liar! If you search Zhao Ting & Oscar, It says Sorry, cannot find any results. Shame on you, Chiina!" Baidu found around 1,310,000 relevant results when I searched for it, it says: 百度为您找到相关结果约1,310,000个 having you tried entering the search yourself?
    6
  5045. Ukraine is supporting the ultra-nationalists like the Azov Battalion that's carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Luhansk and Donetsk. Over the last 8 years, over 13,000 people have been killed in the Donbas region by shelling (by both sides). Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that began since the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukovych by USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine.
    6
  5046. And she won't take No for an answer, she'll just reiterate her question of "Are you going to condemn Russia?" (expressed in various different forms) until she hears the answer that she want's to hear. That's American MSM "journalism" for you.
    6
  5047.  @beastmode8203  I suggest you read the article: The Return of Industrial Warfare by Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), it suggests that the U.S military industrial capacity is woefully unprepared to take on Russia's military industrial capacity, let alone China's.
    6
  5048. The Diaoyu Islands were once part of China, until the Japanese stole them and occupied them during the war. After the Japanese surrender, Japan relinquished claims to all its occupied territory, so shouldn't the Diaoyu Islands be returned to China?
    6
  5049.  @COYS-o2i  China's approach is to save lives at the expense of businesses. The U.S approach is to save businesses at the expense of lives.
    6
  5050. +RealHipHopManiac "I find it extremely dishonest of you to use the western standpoint to judge your own country in this instance." How exactly am I being dishonest here? Those remarks came directly from US President Truman himself and that's why USA choose to cut aid to the KMT. And don't the Westerners often use Western standpoint to judge China?
    6
  5051.  @ankurantil6137  "not even an inch of land will be given to China because it's greed can never be satisfied" It's astonishing how on one hand you claim China is greedy, yet on the other you're advocating for India to take over Tibet and Mount Kailash.
    6
  5052.  @ankurantil6137  "Tibbetans do not consider themselves Chinese, Tibbet was never part of China, china Occupied it " Look, I've explained how Tibet became part of China 800 years ago after the Mongols conquered both the Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those lands into Yuan Dynasty. During this point, Mongolians also included Mongolia (Outer Mongolia) and Inner Mongolia as part of China. The Manchu conquerors also included Tibet, Xinjiang, Mongolia and even Manchuria as part of China during Qing Dynasty (including Hong Kong and Taiwan). I've explained how those territories became part of China, whereas you're just claiming that Mount Kailash is part of India base on ancient Vedric script?
    6
  5053. The population of Uighurs in China actually nearly quadrupled in size from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    6
  5054. Such rational and thoughful voices like Cyrus' are in short supply in Western discourse.
    6
  5055.  @dedoshucos  China manufacture our own jet engine with turbine blades made of Rhenium single crystal alloy, capable of withstanding the high temperatures encountered in the jet engine and our technology has even attracted interest of other engineering giants like Germany. Video: China in talks for sale of jet engine technology to Germany youtu.be/_QTS-aAqMwU
    6
  5056. Not only did Biden call President Xi Jinping a "thug", but he also called Russian President Putin a "murderer". Yet 13 Americans soldiers died because of Joe "Blunder"s botched withdrawal from Afghanistan.
    6
  5057. First time hearing you speak Japanese. You speak Japanese very well!
    6
  5058.  @Western_Decline  It's a pity that ASEAN itself still refuses to recognize Myanmar government, even though ASEAN claims to not interfere in its member's internal affairs.
    6
  5059.  @AmbietsRato  The Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were within Chinese territorial waters in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." ... (Source: Wikipedia: 1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai)
    6
  5060. Indeed, it's a combination of the Red Scare and the Yellow Peril mentality that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today towards China.
    6
  5061. I've often asked those people who think Taiwan is separate nation, that why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations if Taiwan was a separate nation?
    6
  5062. Russia employs AI and night-vision to make their drones take out the intended target. Whereas nearly 90% of drone strikes in Afghanistan killed people who were not the intended target according to Daniel Hale.
    6
  5063.  @suppeeps5393  If the U.S really has as much oil as you claim, then why are gas prices rising to levels unheard of in the U.S? Why do ordinary Americans have to pay more for gas if oil is plentiful in the U.S? Why did U.S President Biden made a visit to Saudi Arabia if oil is plentiful?
    6
  5064.  @Rex-ww4cw  Yet you want others to speak English because you don't understand Chinese?
    6
  5065.  @Rex-ww4cw  Why do you want everything translated into English, rather than learn Chinese?
    6
  5066.  @nicksman1  The US Dollar isn't even gold backed anymore since 30th Jan 1934, and the USA can effectively print dollars with impunity and weaponize the Dollar through sanctions.
    6
  5067.  @Kianglekable  Look at prosperous Shenzhen in the mainland, just across from Hong Kong and Shenzhen’s economic growth surpassed Hong Kong's in 2017. Source: Shenzhen surpasses US$338 billion GDP mark in 2017, beats Hong Kong and Singapore’s growth scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2128310/shenzhen-88-cent-hi-tech-growth-roll-hit-y2tr-2017 Shenzhen is roughly the same economic size as Singapore and Hong Kong, but recorded nominal output of 2.2 trillion yuan (US$338 billion) in 2017 thanks to its booming hi-tech sector. Over 40% of the output came from “innovative” businesses such as internet, biotech and telecom. And that's despite Shenzhen being under communist party rule, while Hong Kong is suffering under its own democratic government.
    6
  5068. ​@comment sense "who cares. all it matters is who wins. this world = survival of the fittest. lol" Then why'd even you go on rant earlier about animals being boiled alive, when you believe in survival of the fittest?
    6
  5069. According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. Chinese people lifespan was once as low as India's in the past, but have since doubled according to following source. Source: china-profile(dot)com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm
    6
  5070. O S Raikar Thank you. Modern China was built by sweat, blood, tears and sacrifice of Chinese people to turn China from 3rd world to 1st world country. Maybe India will be extremely successful too, one day in future.
    6
  5071. Kim Jung Un agreed initially to dismantle North Korea nuclear facilities, but instead of showing good faith, the USA is conducting military exercise with South Korea, so can't you see that USA is the one chasing NK away from negotiations? Now China has to clean up US mess by encouraging NK back to the table.
    6
  5072.  @FrankLiu-d9r  Cyrus Janssen is aware of Chinese suffering at the hands of some Westerners (but not all) because of how anti-China Western propaganda paints China out to be. There is a rise in anti-Asian hate crimes being committed against Asian Americans (also Asian Australians, Asian Canadians, etc) some of whom aren't even Chinese themselves. Cyrus is trying to help promote better understanding of China to Western audiences so as to reduce the fear and paranoia some Westerners (but not all) have towards China and Chinese/other Asians.
    6
  5073.  @timmykirls2352  I will, if you say 1 thing Good about China's government. Fair's fair isn't it?
    6
  5074.  @ebolmao4129  What makes you think Chinese people lack basic human rights? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Oppo, etc, are expanding overseas, and Chinese investors are buying up real estate and property in your countries. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 China now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people lack basic rights? Chinese people can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up a fifth of the world's population after all. Go to your neighborhood and how many Chinese can you spot in your area? Or go to your local university and ask your local students how they feel about the "Chinese competition."
    6
  5075.  @ezmode946  You're full of contradictions. One moment you said "communism can't support itself for ever," then next you said "Communist China will fall for one simple reason, they bought into the Capitalist game."? Which one is it? Or are you claiming they will both fail? China's current political model is "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics" so it doesn't truly fit into either of those models.
    6
  5076.  @birsiir8251  Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon dominate their respective industries and eliminated competition from smaller American firms. In China there are anti-monopoly laws to clamp down on anti-competitive practices in the industry, even Jack Ma of Alibaba is being investigated under China's anti-monopoly laws. In USA, the monopolies are getting away with anti-competitive practices and the US government is powerless to enact change.
    6
  5077.  @djokawari1  Who said anything about concentration camps? I was comparing how Chinese education system teach our Uighurs Chinese citizens Mandarin and Chinese history, just like American education system teaches Hawaiian American citizens English and American history.
    6
  5078.  @sufansufan5224  Education is mandatory in China and all citizens must attend school for at least nine years, known as the nine-year compulsory education, which is funded by the government (free schooling) Compulsory education includes six years of primary education, starting at age six or seven, and three years of junior secondary education (junior middle school) for ages 12 to 15.
    6
  5079. +Black Pagan Chinese government nowadays more capitalist than truly communist. The government still adhere to certain principles of communism so what's wrong with following a different political system? Not every country has to follow Western democracy to be successful.
    6
  5080. Having the world's largest population means that China has the most brainpower to come up with new plans and ideas as well as the manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses within them, and it's a matter of being able to properly cultivate this talent pool.
    6
  5081.  @notquality3471  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    6
  5082.  @koblongata  Investments are moving out of China recently? In 2020, China literally overtook the United States as the world's largest recipient of foreign direct investment according to the UN Conference on Trade and Development. According to Reuters article: China's $163 billion in inflows last year, compared to $134 billion attracted by the United States, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) said in a report released on Sunday. ... Source: Reuters: China was largest recipient of FDI in 2020: Report
    6
  5083.  @koblongata  It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West. Since the 19th century, many have grown so thoroughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the U.S someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    6
  5084. Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors (just ask the expats) but many Westerners are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands with suspicion.
    6
  5085. Westerners also made use of Chinese military inventions, like crossbows and gunpowder. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of our military technology?
    6
  5086.  @DelapazTotong  Ukrainian forces lost over 100 servicemen in Yuzhno Donetsk, but the media in the West is celebrating the lost of Russian tanks instead of mourning the soldiers lost.
    6
  5087.  @a04a27  The World Health Organization has advised against naming new diseases after regions or races, and the novel coronavirus is called Covid-19, so why use improper name for it?
    6
  5088. It's never too late to brush up on your Mandarin skills. Mandarin Chinese is the world's most spoken language by number of speakers after all.
    6
  5089.  @billyehh  According to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty; China's poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015, as measured by the percentage of people living on the equivalent of US$1.90 or less per day in 2011 purchasing price parity terms, which still stands in 2022. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Poverty in China) ... The Chinese definition of extreme poverty is more stringent than that of the World Bank: earning less than $2.30 a day at purchasing power parity (PPP).
    6
  5090.  @stunningandbrave2520  Throughout the ancient world, Chinese luxury good like silk, tea, and porcelain (i.e chinaware) were in much demand, so much such that the Silk Road was set up to facilitate the trade of Chinese goods westward. Even if you fast forward till today, China is still making goods that are in demand by the rest of the world.
    6
  5091.  @michaelkatz275  Since 2024, NASA is utterly dependent on Russian rocket engines for space travel. The most recent NASA moon landing attempt has been cancelled twice, could it be due to their inability to make reliable rocket engines?
    6
  5092.  @currentchannel3452  "(VPN) is a crime in China subject to 500 Yuan fine and up to 15 days in jail." Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so? There are so many foreign companies that come to China and set up shop here, and many of them require access to Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc, so the government issue VPN license to these companies to operate VPN, so how is VPN a crime in China?
    6
  5093.  @宋庆-i4m  Now it appears that you're just being a sore loser. You choose to phrase your question this way then can't I interpret it that way?
    6
  5094. Western news is "infotainment" where the hosts exaggerate their voices for entertainment, rather than information purposes. This hostess is prime example of it.
    6
  5095. Then how did you post your comment if you have no electricity in China?
    6
  5096. The Kubuqi desert solar power plant can even produce power at night after the Sun goes down. It uses mirrors to focus the Sun's rays to heat up molten salt positioned at the top of the central tower, which is then used to turn water to steam to drive turbines. The molten salt is able to retain heat long after the Sun goes down, so the power plant can produce electricity even at night.
    6
  5097.  @gtengineer1967  In my opinion, Brian is not anti-West merely anti-Western Imperialism. The West has many internal problems of their own (which I'm sure you're aware of) and Brian believes that USA (his own country) should first focus on solving their domestic problems back home rather than worrying about other countries. America's foreign policy should start at home.
    6
  5098.  @ryanshiflett2178  If it was common sense, then why were many Westerners reluctant to wear masks initially? Only after observing Eastern countries donning masks, did Westerners started doing the same. This implies that the idea of wearing masks had to be learnt in the West. At the early stages of the outbreak, there were Westerners targeting Asians wearing masks, some coughing in their direction or even pulling their masks off.
    6
  5099. @Niggur george floyed Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty China and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Even today, countries all over the world recognised Tibet as part of the People's Republic of China.
    6
  5100.  @casualsuede  What cultural genocide of Uighurs? The Uighur language is taught in Xinjiang, even the road signs, street signs, store signs, restaurant signs and restaurant menus contain Uighur written script. Even the Chinese Renminbi note contains Uighur written script so what cultural genocide of Uighurs are you talking about? About kidnapping diplomacy, Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou was literally kidnapped and detained for nearly 3 years in Canada, and the trial revealed numerous flaws in Canadian justice system, such as Meng's rights being violated. In the end, Meng pleaded not guilty and the USA dropped the charges, so which country is the one kidnapping citizens here?
    6
  5101. @Niggur george floyed According to Taiwan's constitution, Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a Map of all the territory Taiwan claims (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    6
  5102.  @Andy-P  The North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    6
  5103. @Andres Leon Did I ever said out loud that Chinatowns are actual 'towns'?
    6
  5104. @Andres Leon I used quotation marks on "towns" so it's clear that I wasn't referring to an actual town. You thought I was being serious about the whole town affair?
    6
  5105. @Andres Leon I clearly wasn't being serious about those "towns" so why are you claiming that I messed up? You really think Chinatowns are real "towns" when I clearly referred to them as ethnic enclaves? Also, didn't the largest American lynching occurred in Los Angeles Street Chinatown? Video: The Largest Lynching In US History youtube.com/watch?v=UpZZf7K12pU
    6
  5106.  @paul-hh9oc  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China is even older than the Birth of Jesus Christ!
    6
  5107.  oneviwatara  Then why is it nobody ever seems to hear anything about Laos and Laotian people? Westerners have heard of East Asians like Chinese, Koreans and Japanese, and in South East Asia, Westerners heard of Thailand, Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, etc, and perhaps even Cambodia. You'll hear many news about these countries everyday But seriously, how many people in the world seem know about Laos and Laotian people? Sad to say, your global presence is very small, nobody really cares about your country, your people and even your language. Your language had to incorporate foreign loanwords from other languages, but it doesn't mean that Laotian people invented other people's culture.
    6
  5108.  @shambalkaran9258  Meanwhile, Huawei made a chip breakthrough with 7 nm for the Mate 60 Pro.
    6
  5109. Westerners often complain Chinese people are rude, jump queues, spit in public, jaywalk, vandalise, disobey traffic rules and so on, so what Chinese government hopes to achieve is to discourage such unsavory behavior through this social credit system. And if their scores fall too low, then they will be barred from buying plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisance of themselves overseas.
    6
  5110.  @michaelkatz275  Meng pleaded NOT GUILTY to the charges in the hearing and was eventually released and put on the first flight back to China. The two Canadians were charged with espionage in China, but were released as a gesture of goodwill with Canada.
    6
  5111.  @Jeff-ej4wp  Canadian companies literally violate U.S sanctions on Iran, yet none of their CFOs were arrested for 3 years. For example, the Toronto-Dominion Bank violated Iran sanctions but just paid a fine instead. Yet you're claiming all Chinese businesses practice lying?
    6
  5112.  @fannyalbi9040  I guess Abe has just found out its meaning...
    6
  5113.  @dedoshucos  Huawei holds 56,492 active patents on telecommunications, networking and other high-tech inventions worldwide, according to Anaqua’s AcclaimIP. Source: Huawei Has 56,492 Patents and It's Not Afraid to Use Them bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-14/huawei-has-56-492-patents-and-it-s-not-afraid-to-use-them
    6
  5114.  @americanpatriot126  Why should China give up Hong Kong? Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    6
  5115.  Beast Mode  Don't worry, because U.S General Milley will make a phone call to his Chinese counterpart (General Zhang) to tell China if that ever happens.
    6
  5116. This is kidnapping without ransom. No amount of money can release the hostage, why not just name a sum, Huawei pays the fine and settle the case once and for all?
    6
  5117. The unipolar world is dying and the multipolar world is being born. The birth of any new system is often painful and takes some getting use to.
    6
  5118. By now, I think everyone has seen this footage (video:youtu.be/8ekA9skT7QQ ) of a missile slamming into an apartment in Kiev and leaving a gaping hole in the building with the structure still intact. It turns out that this was an Ukrainian missile, not a Russian missile that malfunctioned and hit their own building in Kiev.
    6
  5119. Doesn't the term Earthlings also include plants and animals, since they inhabit the Earth much like humans do?
    6
  5120. Hong Kong will eventually be fully returned back to China by 2047 anyway, once the Sino-British declaration finally expires after 50 years. Chinese government is patient and there's no need to lift a finger and eventually Hong Kong will eventually be fully reunified with the mainland. China is actually the only country in the world that allows two different political systems to exist within our borders (One Country, Two Systems Policy) No other democracy in the world is willing to tolerate more than a single system within its borders.
    6
  5121.  @Superpooper-2020  Many Indians (not all) still suffer from the "colonial mentality". Even though the British have left India after decolonization, the "decolonization of the mind" needs to happen to reverse the mental conditioning inflicted by the colonizer on the minds of the colonized. Only then can Indians truly be free.
    6
  5122.  @nowonmetube  Well, don't the Americans also speak positively about Apple products or Nvidia or OpenAI? Yet when Chinese say similar things, you're claim it's overhyped? "Also how would he know?" Kai-Fu Lee is Chinese venture capitalist who founded the company 01AI, and he uses the simple fact that in the world of AI, data is the new oil, and China with it's huge population is bound to be a big source of data. Hence the comparison with China being the new Saudi Arabia when it comes to data.
    6
  5123. China is concentrating on making fantasy into reality. The United States is concentrating on making reality into fantasy.
    6
  5124.  @marnixbrugmans4181  You said: "神州 Shenzhou so you cite UN figures in detail when it's percentages, but you leave out the fact that 14000 casualties is all casualties, of which the majority were soldiers?" The majority? Could you cite me what percentage of those 14 000 casualties were soldiers then? You said: "Oh, and you also forget to mention that the civilians deaths primarily occurred in those ares because that's where the majority of the combat was, there is no mention made of who caused them (ie which side in the conflict" I clearly mentioned that those civilian casualties (81.4% from 2018 - 2021) came from Donbas region, where the Ukraine Armed Forces were fighting the two now republics of Donetsk and Luhansk, so it's apparent from which side of the conflict those civilians were killed.
    6
  5125.  @intothewrx  How did China broke the promise of two systems? Hong Kong today clearly have their own government separate from the mainland, and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections, so how did China broke the promise? Please explain.
    6
  5126. China: "Making bridges is a business." USA: "Making war is a business."
    6
  5127.  @chrishamlin5863  The Middle East currently lacks the necessary numbers of engineers, architects and builders to meet the requirements of BRI projects, so why not hire Chinese workers to lay the groundwork first, while Middle Eastern universities train more engineers, builders and architects? Once they have sufficient numbers, the local workers can start taking over the projects.
    6
  5128.  @weizhang2834  Haidilao was founded in Jianyang, Sichuan, China in 1994, how is it a Singaporean company? Are you perhaps going to say next that Tik Tok is a Singaporean company too?
    6
  5129.  @iknowyoubetter2028  What's the name of the Chinese manufacturer that Netherlands bought their masks from? China had given Spain a list of approved Chinese suppliers to buy from, but Spain choose to buy from unapproved company, Bioeasy, which is not on the list of approved vendors, so why blame China when Spain choose to buy from unapproved company not on the list?
    6
  5130. Agreed. Food is arguably what unites people of different countries together. It not only fills your stomach, it nourishes the mind, invokes memories, invigorates workers, sparks interests in trying out new things, and so much more.
    6
  5131. English is being taught in most Chinese schools, but Mandarin isn't taught as much in many Western schools, that's possibly one reason why many Chinese generally understand the West better than the West of China. Another factor is that Chinese tourists can be found all over the globe, during 2019, over 100 million overseas trips were made by Chinese. Western schools and universities are also flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers.
    6
  5132. Underground channels also help to minimize water loss through evaporation on the surface.
    6
  5133.  @skyeagle3123  You're claiming that China kept the coronavirus a secret, but China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. So why are you accusing China of keeping the coronavirus a secret?
    6
  5134.  @skyeagle3123  It's actually thanks to China that information about the novel coronavirus is made known to the world, yet why'd you accused China of keeping Covid-19 a secret, when China has been sharing information about the coronavirus to other countries, through the World Health Organization and through scientific journals such as The Lancet? And you're saying now that Covid-19 was actually out in 2018 instead of 2019, then why didn't other countries report the coronavirus to the WHO? For example, the U.S CDC tested over 24,000 American blood samples from across all 50 states, dating back to 14th Dec 2019, and they detected the presence of Covid-19 antibodies. Antibodies takes around two weeks to develop, so this implies that Covid-19 was present in USA even earlier than 14th Dec 2019. Yet the USA, with their advanced medical technologies, the best doctors and medical expertise, still did not detect Covid-19 back in 2019? Instead it was up to China with our inferior medical expertise to detect this new pneumonia-like illness on 31st Dec 2019 and inform the World Health Organization? Then it's actually thanks to China pointing out the existence of this virus isn't it? Also, if you claim Covid-19 was man-made, then why did China release Covid-19 in Wuhan of all places? That would not only cause trouble for China, it also makes other countries point the finger at China, so how does your conspiracy theory that Covid-19 is man-made even make sense at all? As for the CPC member who owns 20 trillion dollars, who is this communist member? I've shown that most of the Communist Party members are farmers, herdsmen, fishermen, workers, managers, professionals, technicians, or administrative staff, who is this communist member who owns 20 trillion dollars? I mean, the richest man in the world currently is Elon Musk worth only 269 billion dollars. Behind Musk, Jeff Bezos of Amazon has an estimated net worth of 187 billion dollars. Bill Gates of Microsoft has a net worth of 131 billion dollars. Yet you're claiming that this unnamed communist party member owns 20 trillion dollars, more than all these richest people in the world?
    6
  5135. Before I went to sleep, my wife was complaining to me: "This Russia is such a bad country, if Ukraine wants to join NATO, it is their business and freedom, Russia has no right to intervene. This is just an excuse for Russia to invade Ukraine." I said nothing, got out of bed and went to the kitchen, before returning to bed with knife in my hand. I told my wife: "Let's go to sleep" Upon seeing the knife, my wife sat up abruptly and looked at me with wide eyes. "What are you doing? Sleeping with a knife?!" she exclaimed. I replied: "Don’t worry about it, let’s go to sleep. Besides, me sleeping with a knife is none of your business and it is my freedom." My wife said: "You're crazy! How can I sleep when you are lying next to me with a knife? What if you accidentally cut me?" I replied: “Well, you don’t even trust your own husband, how can you expect Russia to trust Ukraine? Sleeping with a knife is like Ukraine joining the NATO." .... An anonymous analogy taken off Weibo.
    6
  5136.  @gregorjerman973  Since you acknowledged that the Manchu ruled Qing Dynasty is China (and by extension, the Mongolian ruled Yuan Dynasty is China) then why is Communist ruled China suddenly no longer China? What is your logic?
    6
  5137. ​ @chaospilot2142  So because I point out Islam harmful effects, means I am rassist? Do you have to be so politically correct all the time? Look at the West and its being overrun with political correctness and Westerners are literally bending over backwards to accommodate Muslims. Refugees are fleeing their conflicted Islamic countries and settling in predominantly Christian Western countries like USA and EU and are under little pressure to adapt to their new environment, much to the dismay of Americans and Europeans. For example, Muslims men may take on multiple wives, and Muslim women continue to wear Islamic head veil in public, and secretly, many Westerners are angry about it, but they are afraid to voice their true opinions for fear of being labelled as racists (or as you spelt, rassist) or Islamophobes (fear of Islam) because political correctness culture is preventing the West from being honest. The Muslims take Westerners silence as acceptance of their cultures, and continue to spread Islam. Furthermore, non-Muslims must convert to Islam if they marry a Muslim, while being Christian is a matter of choice. Caucasian Christian families are growing smaller too, because of low birth rates and higher divorce rates, while Muslims are bringing their huge families (especially if they have 4 wives) to Western countries and spreading Islam throughout the West.
    6
  5138.  @phlei95014  South Korea was actually a dirt-poor under democracy, and South Korea's economic prosperity was actually achieved under South Korean dictator, Park Chung-hee. When Park first came to power in 1961, South Korea's per capita income was only US$72.00, (lower than some Sub-Sahara countries) and it was actually North Korea that was the greater economic and military power on the peninsula at that time (due to the North's history of heavy industries such as the power and chemical plants). One of Park's main goals was to end the poverty of South Korea, and lift the country up from being a underdeveloped economy to a developed economy via statist methods, using the Soviet Union and its Five Year Plans as a model. Park is credited with playing a pivotal role in the development of South Korea's tiger economy by shifting its focus to export-oriented industrialisation. But at the same time, Park's methods grew increasingly authoritarian. In 1972, Park declared martial law and introduced the highly authoritarian Yushin Constitution. Political opposition and dissent was now constantly repressed and Park had complete control of the military, and much control over the media and expressions of art. ... Source: Wikipedia: Park Chung-hee So it wasn't because of democracy that South Korea flourished, it was because of South Korean dictator Park Chung-hee.
    6
  5139. In fact, the population of Uighurs in Xinjiang grew by 25% from 2010 to 2018. Some "genocide" where the Uighur population actually increased in size.
    6
  5140.  @joesalazar770  Wait a minute. You're saying it was China's own cheap labor and China's government policies that attracted American companies to set up shop in China? Then isn't it the Chinese government that paved the way for China's eventual industrialization, not the US government?
    6
  5141. Meanwhile, as of March 2021, Canada has secured over 300 million Covid-19 vaccine doses, enough to cover their population 5 times over. Here's a list of countries by number of Covid-19 vaccine doses procured per person. 1. Canada (8.7 per person) 2. United Kingdom (7.3 per person) 3. New Zealand (6.6 per person) 4. Australia (5.1 per person) 5. Chile (5.7 per person) 6. European Union (4.6 per person) 7. United States (4 per person) ... Source: Duke Global Health Innovation Center youtu.be/2ty2J0s2W0c?t=182 Imagine 1 Canadian having access to 5 vaccines, while elsewhere in the world, 10 Africans have to fight for access to 1 vaccine.
    6
  5142. The Colonial Mentality syndrome continues to afflict the minds of many Filipinos (but not all). Even though Philippines has physically decolonized, the minds of many of its people remain colonized.
    6
  5143.  @ColoniaMurder20  You said: "Han Chinese only able learned to sail in open seas in the middle of Ming dynasty" Chinese envoys sailed into the Indian Ocean from the late 2nd century BC, and reportedly reached Kanchipuram, known as Huangzhi (黄支) to them, or otherwise Ethiopia as asserted by Ethiopian scholars. During the late 4th and early 5th centuries, Chinese pilgrims like Faxian, Zhiyan, and Tanwujie began to travel to India by sea, bringing Buddhist scriptures and sutras back to China. By the 7th century, as many as 31 recorded Chinese monks, including I Ching, managed to reach India the same way. In 674, the private explorer Daxi Hongtong was one of the first explorers to end his journey at the southern tip of the Arabian Peninsula, after traveling through 36 countries which were located west of the South China Sea. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Chinese exploration: Maritime exploration: Indian Ocean and beyond)
    6
  5144. Even hurricane victims get payout of $750.
    6
  5145.  @patricka.crawley6572  Tibet is currently part of China. Draw the ap of People's Republic of China and Tibet is clearly marked as part of China. And the Kuomintang lost the mainland to Chinese communists, that's why they are stuck in Formosa.
    6
  5146.  @jtf873  Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    6
  5147.  @bigchef3394  American tanks in World War II were generally inferior to their German counterparts. German tanks boasted better armor protection and more firepower.
    6
  5148.  @bigchef3394  You said: "the Americans absorbed thr German scientist to prevent the russians from taking them" Russia had suffered immense loss at the hands of the Nazis with over 20 million dead, that's why they needed brainpower to help rebuild their devastated country, just like USA wanted Nazi scientists for their own interests.
    6
  5149. Hong Kong is part of China under the One-Country, Two-Systems policy, and most of the world recognize Taiwan as part of China under the One-China principle. If you go and read Taiwan constitution, it says clearly that Taiwan is part of China and the Kuomintang holds the "One China Principle" and maintains its claim that under the ROC Constitution (passed by the Kuomintang government in 1947 in Nanjing) the ROC has sovereignty over most of China (including by their interpretation both mainland China and Taiwan).
    6
  5150. @Ben Benito In Artificial Intelligence, China has unveiled the world's first AI News anchor as well as the world's first female AI News anchor
    6
  5151. Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. All verified eyewitness accounts present in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We\'re \'Remembering\' are British Lies ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053
    6
  5152. +M Halvaresh China only sold small arms to Sudan that's all, we did not hire any Islamic militants. China observes a policy of non-interference in other countries internal affairs, and we will sell arms to anyone who wants to buy them, and also offer to build infrastructure in their countries. In many African countries China is helping build infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, schools, hospitals, hotels, football stadiums, shopping centers, powerstations, dams and telecommunication projects. China has done much to develop Africa in decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    6
  5153.  @bens8013  If you're against artillery shells landing in people's houses, then have you been paying attention to what the Ukrainian Army have been doing in Donbas? They've been shelling civilian homes since 2014. According to UN reports on Donbas, some 13,000 people have been killed, including 2,000 civilians. Close to 90% of conflict-related civilian deaths have resulted from indiscriminate shelling of residential areas.
    6
  5154. China once tried 'democracy' when Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew Qing dynasty and established Republic of China in 1911. But China was divided into many provinces ruled by individual warlords, we lost control of Tibet, and the Japanese even invaded. In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realizing a unified China under democracy. Next China tried 'communism' and Mao Zedong managed to unify China and proclaim People's Republic of China in 1949 (which the previous Kuomintang failed to achieve for 37 years!) and Tibet became part of China again. But while Mao Zedong was excellent tactician, he was poor governor and his policies for China were disastrous. This led to Mao making self-criticism and stepping down as state chairman. So China tried 'capitalism' when Deng Xiaoping opened China up and reformed economic policies in 1970s, and China progressed rapidly. But university students began protesting for more democratic reforms and Deng didn't want that so he sent the People's Liberation Army to stop the protests in 1989. Deng Xiaoping refused to admit his mistake even till his death. Now, China is following 'socialism with Chinese characteristics' under President Xi Jinping and its still too early to tell whether we will be successful. But it shows that China has tried various political systems to various degrees of success, and each Chinese leader had some vision of China that he wished to achieve. They all contributed to China in some way or another, so China is not suffering from 'political stagnation' that the West seems to be suffering from.
    6
  5155. Yes, it's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today.
    6
  5156.  @xerozero976  About Capitalism versus Communism, it's no secret today that Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, hospitals, schools, etc for everyone on the planet. Yet we still have starving people, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking health care, because under capitalism, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to needs." The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism seeks to exhaust the planet's resources, while communism is dedicated to distributing resources according to needs.
    6
  5157.  @xerozero976  Under President Xi Jinping's anti-corruption campaign, over 100 officials of provincial-ministerial level and above have been implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China, which began after the 18th Party Congress in 2012. Source: Officials implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China (2012–2017) wikipedia.org/wiki/Officials_implicated_by_the_anti-corruption_campaign_in_China_(2012%E2%80%932017)#:~:text=Over,2012
    6
  5158. Outer Manchuria had previously been part of several Chinese dynasties including the Tang, Liao, Jin, Eastern Xia, Yuan, Northern Yuan, Ming, Later Jin, and Qing dynasties.
    6
  5159.  @ChillDfect  You said: "'I'll never forget the kindness and hospitality I was so fortunate to experience, there." Funny, in another post you claimed what I said that _"Chinese: 'Welcome to China!' Americans: 'Go back to China!'"_ as BS, when this is clearly what you experienced while in China.
    6
  5160. @Al Castel Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    6
  5161. America's foreign policy should start at home.
    6
  5162.  @ChuckUstaad  "See Past experience India faced from China" Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai came up with the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence (和平共处五项原则) to settle the border issue with India. But the Indian PM Nehru refused to sit down to negotiations, instead he pursued a "Forward Policy" of building outposts at our disputed border. India even build outposts beyond the internationally accepted border, on actual Chinese territory as recognized by India.
    6
  5163. Chinese are willing to sacrifice short-term freedoms (through lockdown and mask-wearing) in order to achieve long-term gains (re-opening). Whereas many Westerners aren't willing to sacrifice short-term freedoms which is why many protest lockdowns, mask-wearing or anti-vaccination.
    6
  5164.  @gracesutton1359  In my opinion, an increase in freedom of speech should be accompanied by an increase in taking responsibility for what's being said. But it has reached a stage in the U.S, where some Americans aren't taking responsibility for what they said.
    6
  5165. It's capitalism at work, where the Japanese government refuses to spend more money on building storage or better treatment facilities. They could cancel the Tokyo Olympics and use the money to treat the irradiated waters, but it isn't profitable, so its capitalism guiding Japanese government to seek the most money-saving option, which is to dump the irradiated water into the ocean.
    6
  5166.  @sara.cbc92  China is world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. China is a major driver of economic growth, why do you want to flush China away?
    6
  5167.  @cchannel7857  Who is this WuMao spokesperson who refused to give his name? Who was that one eyewitness? Who was that reporter? There's literally no way to verify the authenticity of your entire comment.
    6
  5168.  @williamtell5365  It's always been a rotating door in China with expats entering and leaving the country. Most expats' work VISAs expire around the same time at the end of the business year, and unless they can renew their VISAs they might choose to go home. Furthermore, more Chinese are becoming highly educated and a lot more are educated abroad, meaning that international companies might prefer hiring locals to foreign expats (especially with the lower wages).
    6
  5169.  @zetristan4525  You said: "Similar happens in China (and all major countries). Anyone with independent thinking is labeled foreign-owned until the majority destroys that person's reputation," Could you name me an example of such a thing happening to someone in China?
    6
  5170. Exactly. Large populations have more geniuses, and since China has 4x the population of the U.S, then statistically speaking there should be 4 Chinese geniuses for every 1 American genius, all other things being equal. Consider two bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal. ... Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large Populations Have More Geniuses (by William P. Meyers)
    6
  5171.  @josesilva4171  If you were really pro-Ukraine, then wouldn't it be better if Zelenskyy sued for peace?
    6
  5172.  @urdude67  You said: "Well, who can say that China lifted itself out of poverty, when a great deal of the goods manufactured in China were for companies from other nations like the USA?" Foreign companies like Nike and Apple, did come to China, set up shop here and hired local workers, but according to statistics, the workers were earned only a meager 10¢ to every dollar of profit that Western companies made. It was through Chinese people's frugality nature and painstakingly saving up millions of 10¢ over the decades, that allowed China to lift people out of poverty and into the middle class. Therefore, I believe I can rightly say that China lifted ourselves out of poverty. Western companies certainly did not do so, they paid the lowest wages possible to Chinese workers.
    6
  5173. Nancy Pelosi is like the modern day Helen of Troy, except it's her visit that launched a thousand ships, certainly not her face.
    6
  5174. Trump already made it clear that he was willing to use Meng's arrest as a "bargaining chip" against China for his trade deal. Even the new Biden Administration hasn't so much as uttered a word to Canadian PM Trudeu over what to do with Meng, so more Canadians need to realize that the U.S is just using Meng to cause a rift in between Canada and China and for relations to deteriorate between the two,
    6
  5175.  @thisiskevin1000  The question then is what benefit has switching recognition from Beijing to Taipei brought to the Marshalls, Palau and Nauru? Mainland China offers much in the way of infrastructure development and economic cooperation, compared to what Taiwan Island has to offer to those countries.
    6
  5176.  @nicolasbouyiouclis4726  It goes without say that the video is very disturbing though. And on the victims were the white armbands that were also featured in the Bucha footage.
    6
  5177. Do you actually have evidence that she or her family has been tortured? Otherwise, why jump to conclusions without proof?
    6
  5178.  @singh.jayesh1866  Many Western diplomats have acknowledged that decoupling from China is virtually impossible at this point.
    6
  5179. I've seen weaboo Caucasians wishing they were Japanese, Africans wishing they were Caucasians, and even some Asians wishing they were African (so that they can impress the ladies with their size). Seems the world is filled with people uncomfortable in their own skin.
    6
  5180.  @MarkYeung1  What makes you claim China has minimal energy resources? For example, China is home to the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam, making China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity.
    6
  5181. Dozens of countries have extradition treaty with the USA, yet Meng visited those countries without getting arrested, but Canada was the one who accepted the U.S extradition request. From September to December 2018, Meng traveled to France, Britain, Ireland, Poland, Singapore, Japan and Belgium. All seven countries are having a bilateral agreement on extradition with the U.S. Canada was the only one that helped the U.S. government in this kind of dirty game.
    6
  5182.  @soundbite290  Britain literally stole Hong Kong from China. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want what the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China, and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period in Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken and made into British colony to act as drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former colonies, Hong Kong was not even fully returned back to China. Instead China had to sign a 50 year treaty just for Britain to hand over what belongs to China?
    6
  5183. The China-Solomon Islands security deal should have be making headlines in the West, but it seems that the West is much too preoccupied with Ukraine to even notice this taking place. I see the deal as mainland China taking precautionary steps in laying the groundwork and shaping the potential battlefield in the future possibly over Taiwan island.
    6
  5184.  Neptunian Yes  Many Westerners previously held negative opinion of China until they visit China and see what life is like here for themselves. Even Daniel Dumbrill once shared a personal story that he held negative opinion towards the Communist Party of China, even after living in China for months. One day, Daniel just suddenly had an epiphany of sorts that maybe he was the one being brainwashed by the Western anti-China propaganda all this time. Sometimes, Daniel Dumbrill shared this personal story in his videos. I'm sure Cyrus Janssen has a moment in his life when he held negative opinions about China, it was only after visiting and living in China for a while, did he realised that he'd been duped by Western anti-China propaganda.
    6
  5185. But if India joins Belt and Road Initiative, then Chinese workers will still continue building infrastructure in Kashmir, as part of OBOR, isn't it?
    6
  5186. China first invented paper money and the world followed. Eventually the world will do so with digital currency as well.
    6
  5187.  @michaelkatz275  "神州 Shenzhou You may have debunked the debt trap as a myth in China, but the remainder of the world has an entirely different view of the situation," The reports were published by reputable organizations such as Chatham House and Lowy Institute, so how is it only in China?
    6
  5188.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  "sadly your comment is hidden now." YouTube censorship at its finest.
    6
  5189. I recommend When China Rules The World (by Martin Jacques) and Has China Won? (by Kishore Mahbubani)
    6
  5190. Jed Luk Every country has own methods to dealing with religions. Historically, China has had several different religions coexisting together, such as Taoism, Buddhism, Confucianism (not really religion but more a set of principles) as well as Christianity and Islam. But there hasn't been any Crusades, holy wars or Jihad here, because of China is primarily atheist state. Thus, Chinese government allows practice of religions but does not allow any one to dominate governance of China. Just like China is sinicize our provinces, USA is also Americanizing its territory. USA annex Texas from Mexico and Americanized it. Even US territories in Puerto Rico and especially Hawaii have been heavily Americanized. So what's wrong with Chinese government controlling religions in China? While on Chinese lands, those religions are subject to Chinese laws isn't it?
    6
  5191.  @timlin3243  The United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Whereas China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc.
    6
  5192.  @midknightfenerir  You said: "Chinese Support Pakistan that means India must fight Chinese puppets." Pakistan has always been a long-term friend and ally of China, we often call Pakistani our 'iron brother' (巴铁) because our bond is as strong as iron. Since Pakistan has helped China, China wants to repay the favor by helping develop Pakistan infrastructure to better their country. Whereas India is literally eyeing Pakistan territory in Jammu & Kashmir, and India has previously caused Pakistan to lose territory (i.e East Pakistan became Bangladesh) so Pakistan is understandably wary of India.
    6
  5193.  @michaelmoore1637  Just look at the rise in Anti-Asian hate crimes being committed against people of Asian descent (including Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese, etc) in the West. How is this not indicative of the "Yellow Peril" mindset in the West?
    6
  5194. In a huge country like China, logistics are the most salient issue and there needs to be good infrastructure to transport food from the food-producing regions to the areas that need it the most, and that's where China's excellent infrastructure really shines.
    6
  5195.  @nickt2822  China celebrated the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China with its biggest military parade in Tiananmen Square, that's what happened.
    6
  5196.  @MarkYeung1  According to surveys in Russia, around 83% of Russians polled support Putin's actions as the President of the Russian Federation, so this seems to indicate that Putin is for the people after all.
    6
  5197. +Robert Hardy Many major countries all over the world recognize Taiwan as part of China under the One-China Policy. World leaders such as US President Trump, Russian President Putin, German Chancellor Merkel, British PM May, Indian PM Modi, Japanese PM Abe, etc, all currently recognize Taiwan as part of China.
    6
  5198.  @Chris-to9gv  Why would the Uighurs disagree? The population of Uighurs in China have nearly quadrupled in size from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020.
    6
  5199. The Chinese government has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's direction and future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc, and to set specific goals for China to achieve. Some of these goals include (but are not limited to): -By 2020, China plans to eliminate poverty completely and establish moderately prosperous society. -By 2025, China plans to transform our manufacturing industry to incorporate high-end technology. -By 2030, China plans to be world leader in Artificial Intelligence -By 2035, China plans to be key innovative, scientific power and establish moderately socialist society. -By 2040, China plans to ban all fossil fuel powerplants and all non-electric vehicles for greener future. -By 2045, China plans to be world leading space nation, having established a space elevator. -By 2050, China plans to have surpassed the USA as global superpower, economically and militarily. Source: Xi outlines his vision to achieve ‘China Dream’ by 2050 atimes.com/article/xi-outlines-vision-achieve-china-dream-2050/ By abolishing the presidential term limit, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come into fruition in the future. Whereas in USA for example, their leaders have to step down when their presidential term ends after 4-8 years, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more.
    6
  5200.  @abbotsful  Chinese celebrate many historical festivals such as Spring Festival (Chinese New Year), Lantern Festival, Qingming (Grave Sweeping) Festival, Dragonboat Festival, Double Seventh (Chinese Valentines Day) Festival, Mid-autumn Festival, and so on. Here's some video of Chinese festivals in China. Video: Dragon Boat Races Celebrate China's Ancient Past | National Geographic youtu.be/YlPExNPyPwQ Video: Lantern Festival celebrated across China youtu.be/XnXzQ-p-DpY
    6
  5201. I watched American MTV video and the African American rapper can grope the scantily clad women and slap the dancer's buttocks, while singing about how much they love women's bodies, how much they love drugs and how much they love money. They wear expensive bling everywhere, throw money at strippers and that's not even real porn yet! What would your kids think if they see such videos?
    6
  5202. Agreed, during multiple-course Chinese dinners, the last course is oftentimes a rice or noodle dish, and the last dish is customarily left untouched by the guests to show that the earlier courses were filling.
    6
  5203. Agreed. The Grayzone did an excellent piece revealing that during the Afghan War, 90% of US spending went to Military-Industrial Complex contractors youtu.be/7SzNSh0IA-I
    6
  5204.  @NaughtyNovaroo69  If you claim Taiwan is the real China then why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1919) lost the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China.
    6
  5205. China might not even need to use this trump card, since President Trump will eventually have to step down as US president when his term is over, and what if the next US president decides to reverse Trump's tariffs and lift the US-China trade war? It would become a future economic boom for China as US-China trade relations return to their pre-tradewar levels.
    6
  5206.  @zilun  You made it sound like U.S did invite China to be part of WTO when they clearly didn't. When WTO was founded in 1995, China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate our country as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because the United States and its allies requested that China first reform various tariff policies, including tariff reductions, open markets and industrial policies. The United States imposed additional conditions on China and when China joined the WTO, China agreed to considerably harsher conditions than other developing countries. So don't act as though USA was "inviting" China to be part of WTO, when China clearly wanted to be a WTO founding member in 1995, but was thwarted because of USA, and we only had a late entry to WTO in 2001.
    6
  5207. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US).
    6
  5208.  @winterwolf1  Agreed. I can't think of any action taken by China towards Australia that even approaches the level of the atrocities that Imperial Japanese inflicted on Australians during WWII. Yet Australia seems to have forgotten Japanese WWII aggression. Or perhaps they are "projecting" those Japanese warcrimes onto China today.
    6
  5209.  @syang7775  "Freedom on youtube? Have you ever talked to youtubers?" I myself have experienced censorship on YouTube. I was responding to that other guys claims that (and I quote his words) "Youtube gives you FREEDOM to have a discussion and have disagreements, on any topic. "
    6
  5210.  @christopherhamlin6139  You asked "Why do the people of Vietnam love America and hate China?" During the Vietnam War, the Americans employed scorched earth tactics and dropped napalm bombs on Vietnamese villages, burning them to the ground. "Napalm Girl" is a famous example, having her clothes burnt off her back by American napalm. The Americans also sprayed chemical defoliants like Agent Orange, which cause birth defects among Vietnamese children born even 40 years after the Vietnam War ended. The Americans also planted numerous landmines and left unexploded ordinance in Vietnam that's costing the lives and limbs of Vietnamese unfortunate enough to stumble into them. And then during the Fall of Saigon, the Americans just pulled out of Vietnam and left the South Vietnamese to their fate. Yes, it really sounds makes no sense for the people of Vietnam to America and hate China here. Could it be that it's all in your head?
    6
  5211. U.S Logic: Number 1: There are no bio-labs in Ukraine. Number 2: Those non-existent labs in Ukraine are for peaceful civilian use, not nefarious military purposes. Number 3: If the data in those non-existent civilian labs fall into Russian hands, they will use them to develop military bio-weapons to be deployed in false flag operations. No doubt about it!
    6
  5212.  @Sp3ll633  Over the past 50 years, China has seen massive changes and various improvements to living standards, life expectancy, literacy rate, and lifting of millions of people out of poverty, then can't Chinese bring up these achievements? For example, China has produced more STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) graduates than any other in the world. The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates (2016) 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: World Economic Forum
    6
  5213. Peng Shuai is clearly safe and she has appeared on IOC video call expressing her desire for her personal privacy to be respected. But the WTA is behaving like the paparazzi and demanding that she appear in public to bare her private affairs for all the world to see.
    6
  5214.  Charles Schmidd  70 million? Then why is China currently the country with the world's largest population at 1.4 billion people?
    6
  5215. Agreed. Polls indicate that 70% of American respondents would support a ban on Russian oil even if it means higher gas prices. It's like they've been conditioned by the Western MSM to just accept inflation as it is. And if Zelenskyy truly cared about his people, he would surrender Ukraine to minimise the civilian casualties, instead of using Ukrainians as a meat shield for his refusal to surrender.
    6
  5216. China knows that if Russia falls to NATO's eastward expansion, China will be the next target by NATO (if we aren't already).
    6
  5217.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  It's just a translation from Weibo to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict on a more relatable level.
    6
  5218.  @MarkYeung1  Same thing happened in Tibet, where Tibetan Buddhism had also been hijacked for political purposes when the 14th Dalai Lama accepted American money in order to carry out separatist activities in Tibet. A total of *$1,735,000 (equivalent to $17,044,700 in 2023) was spent on the Tibetan program in 1964. We know this from declassified CIA files regarding Tibet, so here's actual proof of a foreign country meddling in China's internal affairs.
    6
  5219.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "The British government didn't blame the Chinese government for meddling internal affairs." Hong Kong was literally taken from China by the British, how's that an internal affair. During the 19th Century, Chinese tea was in huge demand by the British, but China didn't want what the West had to offer, so Britain waged two wars with China and forced China to open our ports to opium. It was during this weak period of Chinese history that Hong Kong was made into a British colony. Even during the 1997 Hong Kong return to mainland China, Hong Kong wasn't fully returned and till today, some people in Hong Kong tend to have the "colonial mentality".
    6
  5220.  @MarkYeung1  Canadian parliament literally gave a standing applause for a 98 year old Ukrainian veteran who fought on the side of Germany during WWII. Poland has requested Canada to extradite this Ukrainian veteran but Canada ignored it.
    6
  5221.  @MarkYeung1  "Why didn't the Chinese government admit their mistakes they made in 1967?" You've claimed that the organizers accepted money from the CPC, then how much money was accepted? Where's your evidence that the Chinese government was involved in 1967? Whereas we know that the US spent a total of $1,735,000 on the Tibetan program in 1964, yet why is it you continue to ignore this foreign meddling in China's territory? In fact, in his 1991 autobiography Freedom in Exile, the 14th Dalai Lama criticized the US for supporting the Tibetan independence movement "not because they cared about Tibetan independence, but as part of their worldwide efforts to destabilize all communist governments".
    6
  5222.  @MarkYeung1  Canadian government also detained Huawei's CFO, Meng Wanzhou for nearly 3 years even though Meng did not violate any of Canada's laws. During her arrest, she was forced to grant the Canadian authorities access to her phone and laptop, and her device's contents were illegally searched. Meng was not allowed by the Canadian authorities to contact her lawyer to ask for legal advice on her detention, and this is a severe violation of her rights under Canadian law.
    6
  5223.  @Huppy1234567  You said: "Taiwan is a country that’s all." If that's the case, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there some force that's preventing Taiwan from registering in the UN as an independent country?
    6
  5224.  @51dbail  It's the IMF that's the biggest loan shark.
    6
  5225.  @johanhirte9661  Hong Kong also have their own separate government, yet Hong Kong is part China after 1997 handover. Likewise, since you agree that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution, then we are in agreement that Taiwan is part of China, regardless of Taiwan being self-governed. You don't have to control the land for it to be part of China, just like Hong Kong is part of China despite having separate Hong Kong government. Likewise, Taiwan's constitution says that Taiwan is part of China (like you admitted earlier).
    6
  5226. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 Where do you get this figure of 1 million Uighurs in detention? Turns out this figure came from 2 dubious sources, one of which only interviewed 8 Uighurs on what their estimated number of Uighurs in re-education schools were, and then they extrapolated the figure to arrive at the figure of 1 million Uighurs in detention. Source: Claims that China has detained millions of Uyghur Muslims are based largely on two studies. A closer look at these papers reveals US government backing, absurdly shoddy methodologies, and a rapture-ready evangelical researcher named Adrian Zenz. thegrayzone.com/2019/12/21/china-detaining-millions-uyghurs-problems-claims-us-ngo-researcher/ While CHRD states that it interviewed dozens of ethnic Uyghurs in the course of its study, their enormous estimate was ultimately based on interviews with exactly eight Uyghur individuals.
    6
  5227.  @johanhirte9661  That's where the One China Policy comes into play, and many countries all over the world acknowledge the One China policy that Taiwan is part of China (even Taiwan constitution itself agrees). This is explicitly written in the 1972 Shanghai Communique On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia. The Vietnam War was still raging when the Communique was signed but there has been no major war in the Asia-Pacific since that time. The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position. Source: The Shanghai Communique: An American Foreign Policy Success, 45 Years Later thediplomat.com/2017/02/the-shanghai-communique-an-american-foreign-policy-success-45-years-later/
    6
  5228.  @johanhirte9661  I already refuted your Taiwan self-governing point, that Hong Kong is part of China even though they have their own separate government. You admitted that according to Taiwan's constitution, Taiwan is part of China, and I have shown that USA recognize Taiwan as part of China from the 1972 Shanghai Communiqué. I literally cited numerous articles to support my argument, you give nothing to support yours. If Taiwan doesn't give an f, then where's Taiwan's formal declaration of indepedence? Who signed it and when was it signed? If not, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    6
  5229. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 You said earlier that China "claims an entire ocean" but I'm still waiting for you to name that ocean. Is it Pacific Ocean? Atlantic Ocean? Indian Ocean? The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Source: Seventeen Point Agreement wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet.
    6
  5230. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    6
  5231.  @hammermanman5203  Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053 (By Gregory Clark)
    6
  5232. Western society was built upon African slavery, genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, occupation of their lands, and brutal colonization plundering of resources like gold from India. Just look at what Western countries did to Africa, Asia, America and Australia over the course of a few centuries.
    6
  5233.  Molly Wop Chainsaw  Today's enemies can become tomorrow's friends.
    6
  5234.  @everythingandmore5537  Who said YouTube is banned in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    6
  5235.  @MarkYeung1  The 2014 Crimean Referendum had an overwhelming majority (96.77%) voting to join the Russian Federation.
    6
  5236.  @cchannel7857  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According to Gregory Clark, all available eyewitness present inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies (By Gregory Clark)
    6
  5237.  @elisheba3200  "神州 Shenzhou Yes I do understand your views, at the same time why is there poor nations?" Poor nations exist because they have been historically exploited by capitalist colonial countries that seek to extract natural resources at cheap rates, and the capitalist countries turn those natural resources into finished goods to sell those goods back to developing countries at a profit.) The rich developed countries are keeping the poor developing countries poor through colonialism.
    6
  5238. Which country recognize Taiwan as its own independent country? Even US President Trump, the most powerful man in the most powerful country in the world, acknowledges the One-China Policy after a phone call from Chinese president Xi Jinping.
    6
  5239.  @hindugoat2302  Republic of India 🇮🇳 was founded in 1947, two years earlier than People's Republic of China in 1949. Yet despite this headstart, China has since surpassed India in many fields, including GDP, infrastructure, science and development, even though India is under Western liberal democracy, whereas China isn't.
    6
  5240.  @treks6486  Westerners should be more afraid of capitalism than communism. It's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overexploitation of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the end goal being the depletion of the Earth's resources. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" (German: Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen). Because the Earth's resources are finite and distributing goods according to needs would be achieved under true communism.
    6
  5241.  @davidwong5197  Agreed. China's home ownership rate is 90%. US home ownership rate is 65.9%.
    6
  5242.  @j146constructionservices8  Where's the basis for legality? Philippine's maritime boundary is drawn up in the 1898 Treaty of Paris, which DOES NOT include the South China Sea islands as within Philippine territory. (Source: Wikipedia: File: Ph boundary in Treaty of Paris 1898)
    6
  5243. WTA doesn't care about respecting Peng Shuai's privacy, they want to politicize this issue in order to malign China that's all.
    6
  5244.  @kodeedog4660  Agreed. The US knows how to broker peace itself, but they don't want to because of the miltary industrial complex
    6
  5245.  @richard35791  The 1989 Treaty was signed after the Spanish lost to the US. But even though the Americans had initially promised to grant Philippine independence from Spain, they broke their promise and made Philippines into an American colony. (It's estimated some 250,000 Filipino died as a result of the American-Phillipine war) After that, the Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence in 1946 that the Spratlys was not Philippine territory, because it wasn't part of the treaty they signed with Spain, and also because Chiang Kai-Shek was a US ally.
    6
  5246.  @bartonlee3594  Hawaii and Guam are part of the United States, even though those islands are far away from the American mainland. So distance isn't a factor when considering if the Spratly are part of China or not. What we do know is that Spratly weren't part of the Philippines as per the 1898 Treaty of Paris, and Vietnam PM Pham van Dong recognised the Spratly as historically Chinese.
    6
  5247.  @INTJ791  The true hypocrite is when the Americans themselves acknowledged that Spratly was not part of Philippine territory (as per 1898) but now the US supports Philippines in claiming the Spratly islands. Furthermore, are Filipinos today aware of what the US did to the Philippines? The US made Philippines a US colony, instead of granting them independence from Spain.
    6
  5248.  @milexiangyangli5666  俄乌之战，目前听到最简单、最精辟之语: 美国点火💣 俄罗斯开火💥 乌克兰着火🔥 印度观火🌋 中国大陆降火❤‍🔥 台湾玩火♨️ The Ukraine war: American litted the fire Russia started the fire Ukraine caught fire India looking at the fire Mainland China putting down the fire Taiwan is playing with fire
    6
  5249.  @everythingandmore5537  It was actually thanks to China's totalitarian methods that Wuhan managed to get the Covid-19 situation under control, so the lockdown is finally lifted and the people of Wuhan can party. Had China been a Western democracy like India, we would be suffering like India is right now.
    6
  5250.  @wolfwanker6196  You can't refute my points so you just label me 50¢ just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    6
  5251.  @MarkYeung1  Never said it was the first, but the most well-known hyperinflation example in China was during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 between 1935 and 1949. The immediate cause of the inflation is easy to isolate: the Nationalist KMT government continually injected large amounts of paper currency into the Chinese economy. When KMT fled the mainland, Chiang also transferred the gold reserves from Shanghai to Taipei. Estimates of how much was moved differ between sources, ranging from between 3 million – 5 million taels (113.6 tons – 115.2 tons). In The Archives of Gold published in 2010, Dr Wu Sing-yung, outlines how his father (head of finance for the KMT government) helped to mastermind the operation that saw over 4 million taels of gold be moved from Shanghai to Taiwan. One tael is 37.2 grams. Source: Mining: How one man took China’s gold
    6
  5252. Indeed. Pakistan and China are iron brothers (巴铁) because our bond is as strong as iron.
    6
  5253. Hong Kong economy was badly affected by the Hong Kong protestors and rioters resorted to violence, arsonism, vandalism, hurling petrol bombs, breaking building windows, traffic lights, and scaring tourism to Hong Kong. Then Covid-19 struck Hong Kong and it's a double whammy.
    6
  5254.  Justin Truedoosey  The two Hong Kong law students interpret the Hong Kong National Law better than Ben Shapiro.
    6
  5255. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    6
  5256.  @matthewmorgan7106  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    6
  5257.  @item6931  You said: "神州 Shenzhou False. The article is not saying that native Taiwanese are descended from Han," Did I ever said that they are descended from Han? The fact remains that the Taiwan native Aboriginals were descended from farmers that migrated from mainland China 5,000 years ago. So both the Taiwan aboriginals and mainlanders have the same common ancestor.
    6
  5258.  @John2r1  Taiwan island may have been inhabited for at least 25,000 years, but according to studies, those early humans are not the same as Taiwanese native Aboriginals. The native Taiwan aboriginals that you're talking about are descended from farmers from mainland China (specifically southeast Chinese coast) that have settled on the island around 5,000 years ago. That's about the same time as China's 5,000 years of history. Around 5,000 years ago, farmers from the southeast Chinese coast settled on the island. These people are believed to have been speakers of Austronesian languages, which dispersed from Taiwan across the islands of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The current Taiwanese aborigines are believed to be their descendants. Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan
    6
  5259.  @John2r1  You said: "And yes the government system is different as has already been established." China is unique in that we allow two different systems to co-exist within our borders, through the One Country, Two Systems policy. For example, Hong Kong is democracy and they hold regular elections, yet Hong Kong is part of China since its 1997 handover from the British. In fact, no Western democracy has such a system like the One Country, Two Systems policy, where they allow multiple systems to exist within their borders, and that's why China is unique in this regard. (It's as though North Korea and South Korea unify into a single country, Korea, while allowing both sides to retain their own separate forms of governance.)
    6
  5260.  @petehagen8638  The rise of Asia has put the spotlight on Asian men appearance, with the increasing popularity of K-pop boybands making Asian men more sexy and appealing to the opposite gender. K-pop has influenced Asian male fashion styles, defining a new version of masculine appeal that's different from the Western style of masculinity.
    6
  5261.  @petehagen8638  China has a developing country status ourselves, how is China under any obligation to accept immigrants from Africa? Most immigrants often choose to migrate to a developed country like USA, UK, Canada, Australia, European countries, etc, rather than to a developing country like China. Nevertheless, China is the largest single provider of university scholarships to students from Sub-Saharan Africa, awarding about 12,000 from a total of 30,000 bursaries, which represents around 40% of all university scholarships for Sub-Saharan African students.
    6
  5262.  @hamiorg  Decoupling between USA and China is often talked about, but many economists believe that it's unlikely to happen. For example, if USA decouples from China, that means they'll need to spend the next 20 years building factories just to replace China's portion, and that's way too difficult for the usual short term, profit-driven mindset of most American companies.
    6
  5263. During Unit 731, Japanese scientists injected Chinese prisoners (other races prisoners too) with sexually transmitted diseases, pointed guns at them and force them to have sex with other prisoners to spread the disease. I mean, logically speaking, why not just inject all the prisoners with the STD disease, instead of forcing them to have sex to spread the disease? The women prisoners of Unit 731 had it worst, they were raped, infected with STDs and impregnated, and then at various stages of their pregnancy they were vivisected (without anesthesia) to study the effects of the disease on their unborn babies. Genitals of female prisoners that were infected with syphilis were called "jam filled buns" by guards. And still, most of the public knows next to nothing about Japanese wartime atrocities like Unit 731.
    6
  5264.  @HamburgerHelperDeath  I've pointed out that the Russian ruble was the best-performing currency of 2022, how's that being a wumao? I've never even mentioned the Communist Party of China in my post.
    6
  5265.  @scotthughes7440  Of course its all relative as I've explained in how the ruble started low and ended high. But it's not taken out of context, because those EU sanctions were intended to collapse the ruble, but it didn't work.
    6
  5266.  @infernobat8325  "神州 Shenzhou the millitary equipment means not guns or missles but advance millitary microchips" U.S is selling 400 anti-ship Harpoon missiles to Taiwan, how are those advanced military microchips? And mind you Taiwan has to fork out their money to pay for these US weapons.
    6
  5267.  @therocinante3443  Those were the earlier EVs prototypes which tended to have shorter lifespans. However, as battery life improves, more Chinese companies are producing more EVs with longer range and it's these EVs that are making it to the market.
    6
  5268. Trump blames China for America's woes.
    6
  5269.  @Andrew-rc3vh  What's the name of this railway and which developing country was it built in?
    6
  5270. Who says Chinese are not allowed to access Youtube? There are so many foreign companies setting up shop in China, and many of them require access to Western websites like Facebook and Youtube to operate, so why can't they access Youtube?
    6
  5271. Imperial Japan committed numerous wartime atrocities like Nanjing Massacre, Unit 731, and comfort women. During the Nanjing Massacre, Japanese soldiers butchered Chinese men for sport, and held contest to see who could rack up the most kills. Chinese women were gangaped and killed, their bodies left exposed and mutilated, their nether regions bayoneted or having sharp sticks of bamboo shoved in. The young and elderly weren't spared, and Japanese soldiers sliced open the bodies of babies to do them. Japanese forced families to perform acts of incense; Sons were forced to do their mothers and fathers to daughters. Pregnant women were gangaped and had their swollen bellies stabbed, the unborn fetus torn from their wombs and bayoneted right before their eyes.
    6
  5272.  @cdb7876  _ "神州 Shenzhou : Sorry but I've been following CMilk and Serpenza for a long, long time!!! I know better!"_ Serpentza and C-Milk have a history of lying to their audiences, for example, when they claimed Dune movie posters in China excluded black actress Sharon-Duncan Brewster in them. But this has since been debunked and it turns out that Dune movie posters in China do feature Sharon in them, so is serpentza and cmilk really that reliable?
    6
  5273. Hegemonic? There is currently one global hegemony in the world and it ain't China. As for "genocidal" isn't China currently the country with the world's largest population at 1.3 billion people like you said?
    6
  5274. Every action has repercussions. Should Canada be allowed to get away with kidnapping? Because they are Western country and somehow immune to punishment for their crimes?
    6
  5275.  @valenrn8657  You highlighted "it was inhabited by various peoples" but it doesn't change the fact that by Han Dynasty Emperor Wu (r. 141–87 BC) had wrested control over Xinjiang, and that this was before Jesus Christ himself was born.
    6
  5276.  @valenrn8657  The Americans had initially promised to grant Philippines independence from Spain. But after the American-Spanish War, the Americans did not honor their promise and instead they took Philippines for themselves, resulting in the American-Philippine War in which some 250,000 Filipinos died, after which Philippines became a colony of America.
    6
  5277. Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have changed the world. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge much easier. The Compass made navigation in poor weather much easier, and Gunpowder has revolutionized the way modern wars are fought.
    6
  5278.  @spaniardsrk5108  You said: "It's a million times better than a country that's geniciding uyghurs," What genocide of Uighurs? Over the years, the population of Uighurs in China nearly quadrupled from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs (and other ethnic minorities in China) aren't subject to the One-Child Policy (unlike Han), so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953–2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 ... Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    6
  5279. Chinese workers help manufacture cheap products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, clothing, sneakers, etc to help keep inflation to a minimum and keep the cost of living in America lower than it should be. Think of the millions of dollars Americans have saved on living expense over the years thanks to Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on things like cars, housing, getting married, college fees, etc.
    6
  5280.  @adamiskandar5107  China's Metaverse aims to bring cyberspace capabilities into real space, whereas the U.S's Metaverse aims to isolate people in cyberspace and disconnect them from real space.
    6
  5281. Agreed, there are Japanese people from Fukushima who are protesting the Japanese government decision tomorrow dump irradiated water into the sea. Fukushima residents spent 10 years slowly regaining their reputation, now their seafood products are going to take another hit.
    6
  5282. Russia has yet to call upon the services of their most invincible soldier, General Winter, to pay Western Europe a visit and achieve victory for Russia. I think that's when the turning point will occur, when winter visits Europe.
    6
  5283. Although Zheng He himself was born to Muslim parents, the rest of China largely follow Confucian principles, including the government. In terms of religion, Buddhism and Taoism, were probably more common than Christianity or Islam in ancient China.
    6
  5284.  @_nom_  "Damn Chinese. Aren't you banned from here." What makes you think Chinese are banned on YouTube? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    6
  5285. The problem is that many American cast votes in favor of politicians not for their brains but for their charisma and personality.
    6
  5286.  @MarkYeung1  You've also answered your own question when you said rioters who broke the law ought to be punished accordingly. The 2019 Hong Kong rioters fear reprisal for their actions, and that's why they fled Hong Kong. The fact remains that the majority of the people of Hong Kong choose to remain in Hong Kong after the National Security Law. And as I stated earlier, mainland China is home to the largest number of Hong Kongers outside of Hong Kong
    6
  5287.  @marvinpang4861  "神州 Shenzhou Many Indians are very jealous of China's development." Like many Hong Kongers, many Indians also have the "colonial mentality" of worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture, while harboring disdain for any "non-white" culture, including their own. Even though India and Hong Kong (both former British colonies) have been decolonized, the minds of many people in those regions have yet to be decolonized. Like this mark yeung for example, he still worships Anglo-Saxon culture in virtually all of his posts.
    6
  5288. Didn't President Trump deported some 500 illegal immigrant parents from their kids?
    6
  5289. Ashutosh Kumar Why you think China isn't rich because of the rural Chinese? It will be the PLA doing the fighting, not the rural Chinese, and China has the top richest banks in the world by assets worth. Source:List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks
    6
  5290. China is doing our part in the space race, and we are the 3rd country in the world (besides USA and Russia) to independently send people to space and the 1st Asian country to do so. In 2008, during Shenzhou-7 mission, China became the 3rd country in the world to conduct "spacewalk" where the Chinese astronaut left the spacecraft interior and venture out into the vacuum of space. China Shenzhou 7 Space Walk Live Video: youtube (dot) com/watch?v=gMxQEHfU6hM
    6
  5291.  @MylesStandoffish  "The difference is Chinese doping is state sponsored. Here, it's an athlete who decides to cheat, not the country." Even the former US official Mike Pompeo has admitted that "We lied, We cheated, We stole." yet you're accusing China of state sponsored cheating without proof? While looking the other way when the US does it blatantly?
    6
  5292.  @robbienl8176  "Fact is, you can't beat doped athletes without doping." That's merely the kind of thinking that doped athletes adopt. "If I doped and still lose to someone one else, then that other guy must be doped as well." But at times the mind can be stronger than drugs, that's how people quit drugs to become a better person. A doped athlete who lost to a clean athlete and accused the latter of doping is simply revealing his own personal guilt that's all.
    6
  5293.  @robbienl8176  There's a Chinese proverb (身正不怕影子斜) which translates to "If your body stands straight, you don't have to fear a crooked shadow." It means that as long as you do the right thing, you don't have to worry about other people's wrong/unfair comments being directed your way. A man of integrity does not fear rumors.
    6
  5294.  Charles Schmid  Nazism = Fascism = White Supremacy. Ted Cruz supported the white supremacists during January 6th Capitol Hill insurrection, yet you're claiming China is Nazis?
    6
  5295.  @NickNekko  China has a homeownership rate of 90%, much higher than in many Western countries, and 20% of urban households own multiple homes.
    6
  5296.  @caleblee1780  That's describing the Western way of thinking, which is different from the Chinese way of thinking. Looking back on Chinese history, there was a period where Chinese naval power was supreme, yet unlike the Western colonial powers, China's navy did not seek to colonize other countries.
    6
  5297.  Wally Wally  said "China food is for animal standards." Chinese food is delicious, and many people all over the world have professed their love of Chinese cuisine. Want something flavorful? Try our Sweet & Sour Pork. If you want something meaty, we have Peking Duck. If you want something light, we have Dim Sum Dumplings. If you're in a hurry, just grab convenient Baozi (Pork Bun) and eat it on the go. If you like mild spicy, care to try our Kung Pao Chicken? If you like very spicy, dare to try our Mapo Tofu? If you are vegetarian, we have vegetarian Springrolls. And we are tofu heaven. If you like rice, we have Fried Rice. If you like noodles, we have Chow Mein. If you like porridge, we have Congee. If you like soups, we have Hotpot. If you like seafood, well you're in luck, because Chinese love seafood too. Even other countries have adapted Chinese food to suit their local palette. America has Chinese food like _General Tso's chicken, Chop Suey, Beef Brocolli,_ etc. Japan has Chinese food like Ramen (拉麺), Mābō-dōfu (麻婆豆腐), Chashu (叉燒), etc. Korea has Chinese food like _Jajangmyeon (炸酱面) Jjamppong, Tangsuyuk (糖醋肉),_ etc. Australia has Chinese food like _Lemon Chicken, Chicken Stir-fried, Chow Sam See,_ etc. Canada has Chinese food like _Ginger Beef, Newfoundland Chow Mein, Thunder Bay bon bons,_ etc. Philippines has Chinese food like _Batchoy (肉脆), Hopia (好餅), Kiampong (鹹飯)_ etc. ... Sources: _Wikipedia: Chinese Cuisine, American Chinese cuisine, Australian Chinese cuisine, Canadian-Chinese cuisine, Filipino Chinese cuisine, Japanese Chinese cuisine, Korean Chinese cuisine,_ So many people love Chinese food both authentic or modified to suit their tastes, so what's wrong with Chinese food then? I heard that in America for example, there are more Chinese restaurants in United States, that there are Western fast-food restaurants like _McDonald's, Wendy's, Kentucky Fried Chicken,_ etc all combined.
    6
  5298.  @gulamog5041  If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Under their constitution, Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Xinjiang, Tibet, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of all the territory Taiwan claims:(source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    6
  5299.  @almondcaeser9587  "神州 Shenzhou tell me whether china has taken sri lankan land on lease for 99 years due to debt trap." You're referring to Hambantota Port? Firstly, China did not take Sri Lankan land, the port was leased to China for 99 years in order to free up Sri Lankan revenue to pay elsewhere. After 99 years, the port will be returned back to Sri Lanka and the debt considered repaid, so how is China responsible for Sri Lanka's economic woes? In fact, Sri Lanka accepting the deal actually frees up the country from having to pay Chinese debt.
    6
  5300. @AmariGashti Kuti It's mostly derived from the Anglo Saxon Christian evangelism culture; to spread Western values to other countries in order to "save the world". They seem to think no other alternative forms of government can exist apart from Western style-democracy.
    6
  5301. China is willing to work with the U.S on global challenges like climate change. But is the U.S willing to do the same with China?
    6
  5302.  @eleinaedelweiss6215  "Honestly developing countries are more looking at Singapore more than China." Singapore has been under the authoritarian single-party People's Action Party for their entire life as a nation. For 56 years, the PAP ruled Singapore with an iron fist, and its leader, Lee Kuan Yew was a (benevolent) dictator who tolerated no dissent and jailed/exiled dissidents and political rivals. Yet Singapore transformed from a sleepy fishing village nation into a world class country, much like how China transformed after 72 years under the Communist Party of China.
    6
  5303. Well said. Its true that Mao Zedong was excellent strategist, but a poor governor of China. Initially, the Communists were at a great disadvantage, poor training and equipment, and had only 50 members in the beginning of 1921, compared to KMT and Japanese forces. But today, the CCP is among the world's largest political parties and is in control of China unlike Taiwan. Mao Zedong did make some mistakes while governing China (he was only human) but at least he made a self-critcism over the Great Leap Forward, and voluntarily choose to step down as State Chairman, allowing Deng Xiaoping to come to the forefront and implement his economic policies.
    6
  5304. "Confused people indeed" Are you perhaps making a pun of the words "Confucius" and "Confusion" ?
    6
  5305. Why would people want revenge on China? Virus mutation is random act of nature and new strains can appear anywhere, anytime, so why blame China when it can happen anywhere?
    6
  5306.  @MarkYeung1  China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia eventually succumbed to history. China has always been ruled by a strong central government, under the leadership of Emperors and the Imperial Court, because this system has shown to be successful throughout China's long history.
    6
  5307.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou Strong central Government doesn't have to be an autocratic government. UK was autocratic all the while until roughly the Glorious Revolution." Good for the UK then. But China is NOT the UK (neither is the UK China). China must follow our own path to success, instead of just blindly copying other country's systems, and thus far, China has found success under the strong central government then is there any reason China should abandon our system and follow the UK's system?
    6
  5308. " what has China invented in the last 1900 years? " I can name many inventions, starting with the Four Great Inventions 四大发明 that have gone on to revolutionize their respective areas. Paper and Printing allowed the recording and transmitting of information much more easily. The Compass enabled more reliable methods of navigation and exploration, and Gunpowder has revolutionized the war battlefields are fought.
    6
  5309.  @MarkYeung1  Canada was complicit to Trump's request to detain Meng Wanzhou. Trump had admitted that he's willing to use Meng's arrest as a "bargaining chip" this shows that USA don't really care about this, yet why does Canada continue to honor the US request? Even the new Biden administration hasn't uttered a word to Canada regarding Meng's arrest, so this shows USA don't care about Canada. In my opinion, Canada should release Meng and put her on the first flight back to China. The Hong Kong Extradition Bill was proposed to "close up legal loopholes" because of a certain incident. A Hong Kong guy named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, and stuff her body in her suitcase, before flying back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice for his crime, but Hong Kong has no extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to Hong Kong extradition laws. Do the HK protestors even know what they are protesting for? Have they read the bill and understood its contents in their entirety?
    6
  5310.  @TulekBehar  "神州 Shenzhou Except fire is not in your house. 神州" So is the fire in the US's house then?
    6
  5311.  @ne0ge049  You said: "China and Russia would be overwhelmed because both of their militaries combined are still smaller than half of the United States military." Actually, the People's Liberation Army is the world's largest land army, and even just recently, the PLA Navy has been called the largest navy in the world by number of ships, yet why are you claiming that China's and Russia's combined military are smaller than half of the United States?
    6
  5312. China's does not want a trade war, and China's stance is that trade wars are bad for all involved parties, that there are no winners in a trade war, only losers. But China will not be the one taking all the punches, we will retaliate with our own methods.
    6
  5313. @North Korea Is Best Korea You said: "The problem is China deviated from the status quo by refusing to vote to support the UN charter." In 1971, UN countries democratically voted to recognize People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 as China and to kick Republic of China 🇹🇼 out of the UN Security Council. Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The voting results were: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting ... Since PRC won the vote with two-thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, recognized the PRC as "the only legitimate representative of China to the UN" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" from the UN.
    6
  5314.  @aryaman05  Do you have the article for Foxconn moving back with an even bigger investment? The latest news is that Foxconn withdrew from a $19.4 billion deal with India's Vedanta to make semiconductors in Gujarat state.
    6
  5315.  @mojito4493  Why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? Yet you're saying that ROC is the real China?
    6
  5316.  @Kemet3.0  New Tang Dynasty is Falun Gong anti-China media. Look, the situation in Zhengzhou is already so bad, why on Earth would the Chinese government release flood waters, kill more of our citizens and make rescue operations even more difficult? How does that help the government?
    6
  5317.  @feruhlmann6709  Have you forgotten so fast what the Germans did to Russia during WW2? That the Russians suffered the most casualties of WW2 (even more than China) and yet the Soviet Union also inflicted the most damage unto German forces during WW2? It's thanks to the Soviets that WW2 was won, and it was agreed that Germany be divided into two, you're expecting Russia to treat the WW2 aggressor kindly? Furthermore, one of the conditions for USSR's dissolution was that NATO would not expand eastwards.
    6
  5318. Worldly knowledge shows that democracy is going to the dumps. People like Donald Trump seduce voters with false promises of making America great again, and get elected even when he has zero political experience. Even worst, Western elections are susceptible to outside interference and hacking from outside parties. Why not just let the people who know how to govern govern? So many people voting, doesn't mean its the correct thing to do.
    6
  5319. We need more of these rational and intelligent videos about China by people who have actually travelled here before, rather than the constant negative portrayal of China in many Western MSM.
    6
  5320.  @WatchingMindlesslySince2006  Different cultures treasure their elderly folk differently. Beijing didn't told Paris to "shut up", Chinese spokesperson Zhao Lijian said: "We hope that there is no misunderstanding: the Chinese side has never made a negative comment on French management of the epidemic, and has no intention of doing so."
    6
  5321.  @silent6540  我是订户，是犯法吗？
    6
  5322.  @peanut0brain  Taiwan inalienable part of China indeed.
    6
  5323.  @MaxMax-to5ss  China has to host the world's largest population, so its possible that there are simply not enough resources, not enough schools, not enough jobs for everyone in China. With such a huge student population, competition for top schools and higher education is extremely fierce and intense here in China. Some students unable to apply for local universities, so they may choose to study abroad (especially if their parents have $$$) Some graduates unable to find work in China, so they seek employment opportunities abroad as well. That's why Western countries are positively flooded with Chinese international students, competing with local students in tests, exams, for university spots and even job offers when they graduate. If overseas Chinese can't find a job in the West, they are always welcome to come back to China (thus saving China the resources needed to train this student to university degree) and bringing foreign knowledge and technology to our shores. If overseas Chinese find a job in your country, they are depriving a Western graduate of a job, and if they rise to high position in corporate or government posts, then they might get approached by the communist party to be recruited as a spy in Western countries. Whichever way you look at it, China wins.
    6
  5324.  @MaxMax-to5ss  The growing anti-China sentiment in the USA is resulting in "reverse brain drain" where overseas Chinese intellectuals are returning to China, bring in foreign knowledge and technology to our shores. Source: China's reverse brain drain: Nation columnist straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/chinas-reverse-brain-drain-nation-columnist
    6
  5325.  @jakelaw9768  Anti-China sentiment is growing in Australia, even though Australia is located closer to Asia than America and China is Australia's biggest trading partner. Yet Australian politicians like Scott Morrison are fanning the flames of racism against China and following US's anti-China stance.
    6
  5326.  @fairhall001  It was under the leadership of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, that transformed Russia from once being arguably Europe's poorest country into its strongest. Also, that coalition was before WWII (like you said) and it was actually the Russians who not only lost the most lives to Nazi Germany, but the Russians also inflicted the most casualties against the Nazis during WWII.
    6
  5327. Many Chinese hold optimistic attitudes and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    6
  5328. On my screen, it says that there are 6 replies on this comment thread (excluding mine), but I only counted 3 comments being displayed when I expand the thread. What happened to the other 3 missing replies?
    6
  5329.  @buymecola1  Philippines intentionally grounded a vessel (Sierra Madre) onto the Second Thomas Shoal in 1999. China had offered to repair the vessel and send it on its way, but Philippines refused. In 1999, president Joseph Estrada promised that the vessel would be towed away. In 2014, the Chinese government asked the Philippines to remove the grounded ship. In 2017, China and the Philippines established a gentlemen's agreement that the status quo be maintained for the South China Sea, as both sides tried to strengthen their relations. Under the status quo agreement, no construction materials are allowed to fortify the Sierra Madre. However, Philippines has violated the agreement and began sending supply ships with construction materials to reinforce the rusting hull of the grounded vessel.
    6
  5330. In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, reining in companies when they gone too far. Whereas in the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans, waging wars in the Middle East to control the oil for example.
    6
  5331.  @dinesh50448  "神州 Shenzhou Recism is foundation of CCP" If the Communist Party of China was truly racist, then why do ethnic minorities in China (including Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchu) enjoy special privileges over the Han? Ethnic minorities in China aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Ethnic minorities in China enjoy special tax exemptions, free education, priority in health care, and ethnic minority students have an advantage over Han in applying for university. For example, if Han candidate needs 600 points to qualify for a certain university degree, then ethnic minority like Tibetan needs only 400 points (easier to qualify) for the exact same course.
    6
  5332.  @dinesh50448  The Indians love Chinese products like smartphones such as Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, etc. Xiaomi was started in 2010. Today it's one of the world's most popular smartphones. In India, it's number one. Video: How Xiaomi broke out of China to go global | CNBC Reports youtu.be/291DlKa7iIU
    6
  5333.  @jacwi8719  "Ask your Big Boss, dude." I already gave my opinion on what's China's agenda, and that is the rejuvenation of the Chinese Civilization. Over 50 years ago, nobody thought "communist" China would succeed yet look at where China is today and how far we have come. Previously as the Republic of China 🇹🇼 rule, China was once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today as the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    6
  5334. Motorcycles don't have airbags too, and they travel at much faster speeds and a common on the roads. At least this small car has some form of protection.
    6
  5335.  @Legacy241  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    6
  5336. China's meritocracy: Politicians fulfill promises, then get elected. U.S democracy: Politicians make promises, then get elected.
    6
  5337.  @zackk4969  Westerners have been polluting the Earth since 200-300 years ago, back when the Industrial Revolution started in 1700-1800s. Whereas China only recently industrialised some 40 years ago in comparison, yet you rather blame China for decades of pollution, when Westerners been polluting the planet for centuries?
    6
  5338. Peng Shuai has appeared in video call and she wants her privacy to be respected, but Western media would have none of that and they are trying to expose her private life for all the world to see. Why not respect her wishes for keeping her affairs private?
    6
  5339. China has demonstrated the ability to take out satellites in orbit, using ground launched missiles, during the 2007 Chinese anti-satellite tests. How would the rest of the war play out if China destroyed important Indian Army satellites?
    6
  5340. Yes, because the social media in China is regulated, whereas the Western social media are unregulated. All those news about "user's data leaks and privacy compromises" usually point to Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and other Western social media.
    6
  5341.  @ashokjain8449  You said: "If China is so rule abiding why it isn't following the ICJ rulings on the South China Sea." The South China Sea ruling wasn't made by International Court of Justice (ICJ) it was made by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which only rents space in the same building as the UN's ICJ, but the two organisations are not related. The United Nations clarified on its Chinese microblog yesterday that the tribunal that ruled against China’s historic claims over the disputed South China Sea was not a UN agency. Source: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1989486/united-nations-stresses-separation-hague-tribunal The UN said the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, which issued the decision on the case on Tuesday, operated out of the same building, the Peace Palace, as the UN’s primary justice branch, the International Court of Justice, but the two agencies were unrelated. The PCA is not even an official UN agency like the ICJ, so since the South China Sea ruling was made by non-UN agency like PCA, China reserves the right not to adhere to the PCA ruling.
    6
  5342.  @ashokjain8449  About the coronavirus, China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious coronavirus outbreak on 31st Dec 2019 but Western countries choose your ignore it, then how's it China's fault when they ignored what's happening in China? Video: Once upon a virus... youtube.com/watch?v=Q5BZ09iNdvo
    6
  5343.  @ashokjain8449  "神州 Shenzhou Forget the technicality of ICJ." No, you clearly said: "If China is so rule abiding why it isn't following the ICJ rulings on the South China Sea." but what ICJ ruling are you talking about? The ruling was made by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) not the International Court of Justice, and since PCA is a non-UN agency then China reserves the right not to adhere to it's ruling. You don't even bother to fact check yourself, you just call it the ICJ ruling that's all.
    6
  5344.  @Kemet3.0  China built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/b8cCsUBYSkw This makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity, some 856.4 billion kilowatt hours a year – more than double the amount produced by Brazil, in second place. The top three is completed by Canada, which produces 376.7 billion kilowatt hours a year. Source: China produces the most electricity from hydroelectric power weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/
    6
  5345.  @ashokjain8449  Can you explain why you think Chinese people need to be "rescued"? Look, China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    6
  5346.  @ashokjain8449  Clarified what? You don't even bother to fact check your responses, you just claim "ICJ rulings on the South China Sea." because you're just anti-China that's all. You clearly made a mistake but did not apologise for it, and I have also shown that Permanent Court of Arbitration is not an official UN agency unlike the International Court of Justice, so China reserves the right not to adhere to it's ruling.
    6
  5347.  @ashokjain8449  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty China and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Source: Map of Yuan Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/04/yuan.jpg Source: Map of Qing Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/06/f114660d2bf5452994135c4c.gif
    6
  5348. In 2013, China landed our very own lunar rover and spacecraft (Chang'E and Yutu) on the Moon to collect moonsoil samples. This is the first soft landing on the Moon, after almost 40 years of neglecting the Moon by NASA. The Chinese government plans to put a man on the Moon someday like USA, as well as be the first nation to land on dark side of the Moon.
    6
  5349.  @beautanner8409  Ethnic minorities in China (Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchu, etc) aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han), so they can have as many kids as they want and the ethnic minority population in China has grown over the years. Ethnic minorities also enjoy special privileges over Han, such as tax exemption, priority in healthcare, free education for up to 15 years instead of just 9, government bursaries, and special education admission consideration. For example, if both a Han student and an ethnic minority student apply for the same university degree, if the Han candidate needs say 600 points to qualify, then the ethnic minority candidate needs say 400 points (which is easier to qualify) for the exact same university course. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    6
  5350. RockinChopin What do you expect her to do? Carrie Lam had formally withdrawn the HK extradition bill, yet the Hong Kong protests continue. Lam has announced that she is open to dialogue but the protestors aren't, and they refuse to talk. So more authoritarian measures are now needed isn't it?
    6
  5351. Chinese workers manufacture goods like smartphones, computers, appliances, sneakers, clothing, etc, in order to keep the cost of living in other countries lower. Think of the millions of dollars people have saved over the years on living expenses thanks to affordable Chinese goods. If Chinese goods are banned, there will be inflation in America and the cost of living will definitely increase due to lack of cheaper alternatives.
    6
  5352. Cyrus, do you agree that cutting off food, water and electricity to Gaza is a crime?
    6
  5353.  FREEHONGKONG-yn5ij  Decoupling is impossible, even Western diplomats avoid using the term.
    6
  5354.  user-bz4tw3bu9u  Even Western diplomats avoid using the term decoupling, because it's impossible.
    6
  5355.  @jeremyeliaswallace8628  Can Vietnam and India ship their Made-in-Vietnam/India goods to the USA at the same volume as China can? China is home to many of the world's busiest ports that send Made-in-China goods all over the globe, and it is this infrastructure that makes manufacturing in China appealing.
    6
  5356.  @bhl3840  Just remember, since you can covert Dollar to RMB normally, then the digital RMB is merely a digitalised version of the RMB and you should be able to covert USD to DRMB.
    6
  5357.  @ryannverano6452  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    6
  5358. At one point, Putin had expressed interest in Russia joining Nato given that Russia is an European country (that also borders the Atlantic), but the application was rejected.
    6
  5359.  @EricSmith-r5q  Haven't you seen crowds of people in the swimming pool in China? Or of Chinese playing table tennis matches?
    6
  5360.  @EricSmith-r5q  "When I went to see Chinese Fiancée, I observed first hand!" Your hand was your fiancée, that's why you saw it first.
    6
  5361.  @stopwarstop7334  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    6
  5362. Malaysia does more business with China than India.
    6
  5363.  @zackk4969  If that's really the case, then why is China currently the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people? What's the name the renowned Chinese writer in Chinese characters?
    6
  5364.  @zackk4969  According to Wikipedia: A Madman's Diary it says: Lu Xun was an avant-garde Chinese writer who was celebrated for his fictional works that illustrates social and political criticism of early 20th century Chinese society and one amongst his great works of is the “Diary of a Madman”. The diary form was inspired by Nikolai Gogol's short story "Diary of a Madman", as was the idea of the madman who sees reality more clearly than those around him. Then how is "A Madman's Diary" 《狂人日記》 based on a true story when it was inspired by Russian novelist short story?
    6
  5365.  @chungusultimate  There's no point comparing what you say and what I say. What we need is a truly independent neutral investigation into the events occurring on Oct 7 in order to find out the real truth. I understand that Israel has released a list of names of Israelite people killed on Oct 7. Yet many of those killed were actually military personnel and not civilians, because their military ranks were listed beside their names.
    6
  5366.  @chungusultimate  Even if Yasmin Porat refers to a single house, it's clearly eyewitness to IDF opening fire on their own. How can you claim that you know far better than me?
    6
  5367.  @KamillGran-ch5sb  First you claim "He started no wars" now you change it to "not a full scale war"?
    6
  5368.  @CyrusJanssen  I remembered you mentioned that some of Your American friends asked "Does your apartment in Shanghai have access to electricity?"
    6
  5369.  @mandarinandthetenrings2201  Such seemingly racist words coming from you. What happens when Saudi Arabia and China come together to work out a deal between our countries?
    6
  5370.  @mandarinandthetenrings2201  Even your username, the Mandarin is based off the Yellow Peril mindset that Westerners had towards people of Asian descent, that gripped the United States in the 1960s. Marvel Comics capitalized on this Western phobia towards Asians to sell their comics, leading to the creation of the Mandarin as a supervillain
    6
  5371. It's almost as if it's a taboo to say something positive about China in the West.
    6
  5372. India is important to BRICS, because it so happens to start with a vowel, so the name BRICS can be formed.
    6
  5373. +Spiffy Brit The very act of starting a nuclear war with another nuclear state is already considered defeat due to mutually assured destruction. Even if Russia survives, its lands will be tainted by radioactive fallout lasting for generations, just like what Japanese cities still suffer from today after USA's nuclear bombings. You really expect any country to somehow recover from a full out nuclear war with another nuclear country? Another thing you should note is that unlike Russia, China signed a No-First-Use policy with regards to nuclear weapons, meaning we will not use nukes first, unless we are attacked with it. But Russia did not sign such policy, and can legally, preemptively, strike any country in the world with its nuclear weapons with impunity. If nuclear war does breaks out in Asia, it wouldn't have be Chinese to launch the first nuclear warhead.
    6
  5374. China already slowly take over Mongolia through economic relations, why resort to war?
    6
  5375. But you can get right wrong.
    6
  5376.  @Carbuncle0168  Taiwan's economy is stagnating, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising, and Taiwan relies on US military and US weapons for defence. US withdrawal from Afghanistan is an indicator of US unreliability as an ally. Whereas mainland has growing opportunities for Taiwan graduates and since mainland China's economy is predicted to surpass the United States someday in the foreseeable future, then perhaps Taiwan will eventually reach a point where reunification will the mainland presents greater advantage than continually being a pawn of the United States on the chessboard between world powers.
    6
  5377. Exactly. In ancient China, natural disasters were taken as a sign of Heaven's displeasure with the Chinese Emperor, so the central government had to dispatch relief aid to affected regions if they want to retain the Mandate of Heaven and the right to rule.
    6
  5378.  @JO-et2ir  It's not just the Red Scare (fear of communism) but also the Yellow Peril (fear of being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the United States today.
    6
  5379. @Sheriff Lobo Chinese scientists have found a way to convert sand to soil, by developing a paste made of plant cellulose, that when added to sand, helps retain water, nutrients and air. The paste is non-toxic, eco-friendly and affordable. Video: Chinese scientists find way to convert sand to soil youtu.be/idjegdl0L3Y After being treated with the technology, a 1.6-hectare plot of sand in Inner Mongolia has been transformed into fertile land since April (2016). The plants demand the same amount of water as those grown in regular soil, but require less fertilizer and bear higher yields. The cost of converting the sand is between 3,300 USD to 6,00 USD per hectare
    6
  5380.  @HermanWillems  You said: "Ukraine just wanted to be like Poland. Look at how well their economy is going," Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania joined EU yet why their economy isn't doing so well?
    6
  5381. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West, far more than anti-Japanese sentiment.
    6
  5382.  Naikomi  Looking at living expenses, food in China is (generally) cheaper than in Germany. You can get cheap affordable, filling food in China than you can in Germany. Another form of expense is transport, and in China the train fare is cheap compared to German subway. Buying a car in China is far cheaper than buying a car in Germany. The thing is that when you add up all those living expenses for food, rent, clothing, transport, etc, it can be quite costly living in Germany as compared to living in China.
    6
  5383.  @derektay9828  "China never had historical claims to Singapore." So you're saying if you pitch this Chinese commonwealth idea to Mongolia (which was historically part of China) the Mongolians will accept this idea? Good luck with that.
    6
  5384. American law strictly prohibit cooperation between NASA and CNSA (Chinese NASA) yet they want China to share our lunar findings with NASA?
    6
  5385. CurtW1962 Industrial Robots also do not necessarily bring jobs back to American factory workers so exactly what is your logic here?
    6
  5386.  @smallderick9099  Elon Musk was offered Chinese citizenship by the CPC, so if he accepts, then you can't consider him an American isn't it?
    6
  5387.  @smallderick9099  Don't pretend that the US "introduced" WTO to China. The World Trade Organisation was founded in 1995 and China wanted to be one of the founding members. But this attempt was thwarted because the United States, European countries, and Japan requested that China first reform various tariff policies, including tariff reductions, open markets and industrial policies. That's why China had a late entry into WTO in 2001, because the US and its allies posed as obstacles to China's entry.
    6
  5388. @Ming Those bat soup videos have actually been debunked by experts as having been filmed in Panau, an island close to Indonesia, not in Wuhan.
    6
  5389. @Ming Every culture has their own peculiar eating habits. Look at the British eating rabbit stew, or the French eating horsemeat and snails (escargot). The Australians also eat kangaroo meat, emu meat and crocodile meat, so why do look down on Chinese culture because of different food preferences?
    6
  5390.  @cryptorenegade1406  About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No. The "Communist" in the name, represents the parties' desire to be closer to the concept of achieving a communist system. While China is not communist at the moment, it remains a long term goal of the party.
    6
  5391. President Trump also has several businesses running in China, including those of his daughter's, so why would Trump want to support India in its fight against China? What has India to offer to Trump that is worth destroying trade relations with China?
    6
  5392.  @chrishannis1  If you read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of China, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of territories that Taiwan claims under it's constitution. wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    6
  5393.  @joeburns88  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Mesopotamia and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has seen the rise and fall of many empires, yet survived the violent course of history to the modern world relatively intact, whereas even Republic of Rome fell because democracy tore it apart. China has access to a wealth of information on how to govern the world's most populous country, in the form of political literature, military textbooks and governing manuals written by our ancestors. China has always been under authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and his imperial court and that's why China survived far longer than the USA.
    6
  5394.  @junebug8485  You said: "Personally I don't think it's the fear of communists or Asians." Asian Americans have faced a whopping 338% increase in racially motivated crimes nationwide according to studies in the U.S. And mind you, the victims were not only Chinese, but also Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese, Thai and other Asians.
    6
  5395. Cao Cao played the multiple roles of governor, general, strategist, politician, diplomat, etc, all by himself, but Liu Bei had other people like Zhuge Liang as strategist or Guanyu as loyal general.
    6
  5396.  @michaelkatz275  The population of Uighurs in China has nearly quadrupled from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. Because Uighurs aren't subject to One Child policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Here's the Uighur population data from 1953 to 2020: Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953–2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 ... Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China Yet there's allegations of Uighur genocide in Xinjiang by the West?
    6
  5397.  @nitin2779  Why continue calling it "Chinese virus" instead of its proper name, Covid-19? The World Health Organization has advised against naming diseases after countries or races, and Asian Americans (or Asian Canadians, Asian Australians, Asian Europeans, etc) have faced racially-motivated attacks because of their race (some aren't even Chinese themselves) because American politicians like Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo choose to call it by it's improper name. Video: Asian Americans face discrimination in the wake of the coronavirus youtu.be/t_IyTxRNUYk
    6
  5398.  @nitin2779  The Chinese government rushed to built a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised. Video: Huoshenshan: the hospital built in 10 days in China over coronavirus outbreak youtu.be/l2QfufpwfdY Kudos to the Chinese construction workers who worked hard to build those hospitals. China also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. Video: Time-lapse video shows how Leishenshan hospital completed in 12 days youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk
    6
  5399.  @paulodelima5705  Yeah, it's still an increase in the population of Uighurs.
    6
  5400.  @billyehh  You said: "It was China that attacked Viet Nam and got soundly beaten." During the Sino-Vietnamese war, the Vietnamese Army were powerless to stop the People's Liberation Army's advance right up to the Vietnam's capital, Hanoi. But China wasn't attempting to conquer Vietnam, it was a punitive mission to punish Vietnam for invading Cambodia, so China had declared the path to Hanoi open, and the PLA withdrew afterwards. How is that soundly beaten?
    6
  5401. @Karen Xitler Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. Yet he's being labelled a mass murderer in the West, when his intention was not murder?
    6
  5402. China is implementing Meritocracy, where people are rewarded based on good behavior, and penalized for undesirable behavior. People always complain about how Chinese people are rude, how we spit in public, jaywalking, disobey traffic laws, drive through red lights, drive on wrong side of the lane. Well, the government is implementing this social credit system to discourage such behavior and if your score falls too low, you won't be allowed to travel out of the country and become a menace to other countries. But its not the end of the world if your score falls too low, There are numerous ways to increase your social credit to become acceptable enough to travel again. That's the whole point of a meritocracy.
    6
  5403.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  "神州 Shenzhou he deleted it the day after our chat." LinkedIn is no longer offering their service in China and withdrawing from China, so again, that's one possible reason why he deleted his LinkedIn account. Clearly not everything revolves around you. You said: "I will probably report him to our security agency as well. IP theft is a crime." Do you actually have proof of IP theft then? Or just because someone has made remarks justifying Russia's stance, that you suddenly have to throw in IP theft (from out of nowhere, really) as an additional accusation against such person?
    6
  5404.  @brexitgreens  "神州 Shenzhou It was surely not an invitation to turning this thread into a dump of everything you can say about the video." A dump of everything? You literally posted just as many comments as me (if not more), now you just delete all your previous comments and accuse me of dumping everything here? Additionally, your remaining comments here accuse me repeatedly of going off-topic, but how am I going off topic? You even asked me if what I discuss here is linked in any way to the JaYoe Nation's comment, and when I quoted his words that "It's important to see ALL sides of an issue in order to have a clear impression of the whole." you suddenly start talking about me dumping everything?
    6
  5405.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Putin has already said that Ukraine is not worthy of statehood." You've seemingly twisted Putin's words, he said that historically, a stable statehood has never developed in Ukraine. He also said that the current Ukrainian leadership needs to understand that if they continue doing what they are doing, they risk the future of Ukrainian statehood. This is true because what's Ukraine's endgame? NATO has effectively "abandoned" Ukraine (Zelenskyy even lamented such) and they aren't sending troops to defend Ukraine, neither are they going to impose a No-Fly Zone over Ukraine. Ukraine is unlikely to succeed in joining the NATO, because that would mean NATO is obliged to send reinforcements to defend Ukraine if it were a member, and I just can't see NATO willing to risk WWIII over Ukraine. The best option right now is for Zelenskyy to surrender Ukraine, but by refusing to surrender, Zelenskyy is trying to maximise the bloodshed. By releasing prisoners and arming civilians with rifles, Zelenskyy is sowing chaos and trying to maximise the civilian casualties and using them as human shield.
    6
  5406.  @tsftsf9539  Agreed. I only posted 1 original comment here to Jayoe Nation, but it's the others that keep on throwing random accusations against me, and the rest is basically me responding to others. It's those others that have basically hijacked the post to hurl accusations at me, prompting me to respond.
    6
  5407.  @martinlaoshi  "神州 Shenzhou You are trying to conflate abstaining with voting in support for Russia." I grouped those two together because if anything, those who abstained and those who voted in support for Russia represent countries that did not condemn Russia's military operation, unlike those that voted against Russia. And it's a fact that the combined population of these two groups represent around 50% of the world's population, so claiming that the world is against Russia's invasion isn't reality, because different countries have different population after all. You said: "Pretending like abstaining is taking a position against the US is living in a fantasy world." Really? So in your fantasy world, when China abstained from voting in the UN, that translates to as China not taking a position against the USA? That's great news, but why is USA acting like China is against the U.S position then? Why'd Jake Sullivan meet Yang Jiechi if China is not taking a position against the US? Why'd U.S President Biden meet with Chinese President Xi since China abstained and isn't taking a position against the U.S? You said: "That is not how abstaining works. If a country abstains you DO NOT count that country towards ANY SIDE. You only count those who vote for or against the resolution." Tell that to Jake Sullivan and Joe Biden then. Since according to you, China is not supporting Russia, so for what reason do they have to meet with Yang Jiechi and Xi Jinping? You said: "And if you do that the overwhelming majority of countries is against the invasion." That's true if you count the countries themselves. But of those countries who either abstained or those who voted for Russia, our populations represent around 50% of the world, especially if you include China and India. You said: "That's the reality, not the fanasy that you are trying to create." So in your reality, China abstained, therefore China is not taking a position against the US, then what for US have those meetings with China for? After all, China is not taking a position against the U.S according to your logic. You see where the flaw in your logic is?
    6
  5408.  @brexitgreens  While you certainly deleted your messages, it doesn't mean that I'm obliged to do the same. If anything, my undeleted comments serve as evidence that you once posted the same number of comments as me, yet why do you see fit to accuse of others of spam, when you have previously done so yourself? You said: "I'll repeat it as many times as you want: the JaYoe Nation's post is not an invitation to turn this thread into a dump of everything you can think of the war in Ukraine." Why not? What else are we to talk about if not the Ukraine crisis? I mean, Cyrus' video is literally about Ukraine crisis so can't I put down my thoughts about the Ukraine crisis here on JaYoe Nation's post, without being labelled as going off-topic by you? Can't you see the illogicality of your claims of me going off topic, when the entire video is about Ukraine? You said: "You can do that elsewhere under the same video… as you have already prolifically done." Are you somehow the moderator of JaYoe Nation's thread or something? Who gives you the right to dictate to me where I can and cannot post? It's like you're seeing yourself as JaYoe Nation's gatekeeper or something.
    6
  5409.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china
    6
  5410.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  The number of wealthy Chinese people has overtaken the number of rich Americans for the first time, according to a report by Credit Suisse. Source: China overtakes US in rankings of world’s richest people theguardian.com/business/2019/oct/21/china-overtakes-us-in-rankings-of-worlds-richest-people The bank’s annual wealth survey found there were 100 million Chinese people among the world’s top 10% of richest people, compared with 99 million in the US.
    6
  5411.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  Take smartphones for example, Chinese smartphone companies dominate the 2019 Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands according to this source: mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French)
    6
  5412.  @lancemollenhauer9740  "神州 Shenzhou China benefited." So did the US and the Allies.
    6
  5413. ​ @chrisbell238  Cyrus Janssen's videos tell the peaceful message of Building Bridges, Not Walls, between the US and China. If you're claiming that he's being paid by the CPC to post such videos, then honestly, isn't that a positive message for the world? Would you rather hear the alternative message (being one of war) instead?
    6
  5414.  @MarkYeung1  It's your own personal choice who you believe. According to my Jay Matthews source: Probably the most widely disseminated account appeared first in the Hong Kong press: a Qinghua University student described machine guns mowing down students in front of the Monument to the People’s Heroes in the middle of the square. The New York Times gave this version prominent display on June 12, just a week after the event, but no evidence was ever found to confirm the account or verify the existence of the alleged witness. Student leader Wu’er Kaixi said he had seen 200 students cut down by gunfire, but it was later proven that he left the square several hours before the events he described allegedly occurred. (So how could Wu’er Kaixi have seen those 200 students cut down by gunfire, when he left the square several hours before?) CBS correspondent Richard Roth’s story of being arrested and removed from the scene refers to “powerful bursts of automatic weapons, raging gunfire for a minute and a half that lasts as long as a nightmare.” Black and Munro quote a Chinese eyewitness who says the gunfire was from army commandos shooting out the student loudspeakers at the top of the monument. (So it was PLA commandos shooting at student's loudspeakers, not at the students themselves.) A BBC reporter watching from a high floor of the Beijing Hotel said he saw soldiers shooting at students at the monument in the center of the square. But as the many journalists who tried to watch the action from that relatively safe vantage point can attest, the middle of the square is not visible from the hotel. (So how could he have witness the shooting at the monument, when it wasn't visible from his vantage point?)
    6
  5415.  @tl4172  I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    6
  5416.  @Stopinvadingmyhardware  You said: "We are basically defending and providing security for Taiwan for free." Not for free. The people of Taiwan have to fork out their hard earn money to pay for expensive US weapons and often the lower tier kind.
    6
  5417. Even if you present the truth about China to Westerners, there are some anti-China Westerners who refuse to believe the truth and still continue hating China regardless.
    6
  5418.  @garam6555  Brian cites his source at 14:05 of his video to support his argument, you can see the NED activity in Kazakhstan 2020 from its website.
    6
  5419. Japan signed Treaty of Taipei in 1952 renouncing its claims to Chinese territory.
    6
  5420.  @item6931  You said: "Why is colonization inherently worse than a war?" Colonization is the exploitation of a nation's peoples, land and resources to the benefit of the colonizer and to the detriment of the colonized. It lasts for much longer than a war, and its long-term consequences are more severe. Slavery of Africans, genocide of Native Americans and occupation of their lands even till today are the results of colonization.
    6
  5421. Hong Kong had been under authoritarian British colonial rule from 1841-1997, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before?
    6
  5422.  @MarkYeung1  The word stalemate is also used by you, so I'm asking how is it a stalemate when those 4 oblasts are under the control of Russia? Global recognition of those territories may come about when Ukraine starts suing for peace and lets those regions go.
    6
  5423.  @bartonlee3594  "Russia is losing the war. And the Russian people are tired of the Putin thug regime." Russia added the 4 oblasts of Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk and Luhansk region to its territory how are they losing the war? And Putin and Xi enjoy high approval from the people, whereas you can't say the same for the leaders of Western democracies. Their approvals are at a all time low.
    6
  5424.  @arewealone9969  Yes, I would like to ask those 38% what advantage did her visit bring to the island.
    6
  5425.  @junebug8485  Who told you that KMT did the majority of the fighting? When Imperial Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931, the KMT leader Chiang kai-Shek was reluctant to meet the invaders, instead he continued purging communists (our fellow Chinese), until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng had to kidnap Chiang in order to get him to ally with the communists against the Japanese. This incident was known as the "Xi'an Incident" (西安事变) ... Source: Wikipedia: Xi'an Incident Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was thanks to communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release, that he survived to form an alliance with the communists against the Japanese.
    6
  5426.  @junebug8485  After the Japanese surrendered in 1945 at the end of WWII, the KMT had a strength of 2 million (regular) & 2.3 million (militia) (June 1946). Meanwhile the Communists had a strength of 1.2 million (regular) & 2.6 million (militia) (July 1945), so the KMT forces still outnumbered the communists even after WWII. Yet despite this numerical advantage, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates the KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China.
    6
  5427.  @nragtime4990  My bad. Sarcasm doesn't always translate well into text and I honestly couldn't tell if you were sarcastic. People usually exaggerate when they are being sarcastic, like for example: "Rejoice! Everyone will enjoy DeMoCrAcY and we'll all live happily ever after, under the reign of the United States!"
    6
  5428.  @Redfvvg  I cite facts to support my argument whereas you've dismissed them and provided none of your own. And yet you're claiming I don't understand the real situation? Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    6
  5429.  @kalekainxx  I was just reading out loud what the Western funded Human Right's Watch has to say about Singapore that's all.
    6
  5430.  @johnstuartsmith  Lawn-mower-engined drones are cheap to produce compared to missiles. The Houthis' strategy is to wage a war of attrition, forcing their opponent to expend their expensive missiles and making the conflict too costly for them to continue.
    6
  5431.  @holybutterfly8495  "Because this system can let the whole world and the whole poor people to have a better life in the future too." Where does Australia get the necessary funds for Centrelink? Also, even if you claim such a system works for Australia, it doesn't necessarily mean it will work for China or the rest of the world.
    6
  5432.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "blaming India/China border problem on British is an extreme form of shifting blame." The Indian border is the McMahon Line, named after Henry McMahon, foreign secretary of British India and the chief British negotiator of the conference at Simla. This British national just unilaterally drawn the line without consulting China so isn't it apparent that the India/China border stems from Britain?
    6
  5433.  @Something-tz2vw  "Taiwan could easily be independent. It would flourish either way." Well, why doesn't Taiwan formally declare independence then? What's preventing Taiwan from doing so? Clearly there are going to be serious consequences to such a declaration, yet you're saying Taiwan would flourish either way if they declare independence? Also, Taiwan's economy is stagnating. Wages in Taiwan are stagnant yet the cost of living in Taiwan is rising. Taiwan's economic growth has slowed ever since Western-style democracy was introduced to the island in the 1990s. Much of Taiwan's economic prosperity occurred under the authoritarian single-party rule of the Kuomintang. You said: "If it were controlled by China, how many people do you think would move from mainland to this island? Maybe half of China" What has Taiwan have to offer that would entice half of mainland China to move there? Mainland China has produced so many successful companies. In smartphone brands, the mainland has Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Oppo, Vivo. In car brands, mainland China has BYD, Geely, SAIC Motor, Great Wall Motors. But where are the famous companies from Taiwan in comparison?
    6
  5434.  @kickyouinhalf  Like Cyrus said, the American system is set up such that you can change the president, but you can't change the policies. So even if hypothetically, Cyrus gets elected as U.S president, it's unlikely he can change the course of the country by himself.
    6
  5435. During his presidential campaign, Donald Trump promised to release his tax details if he became president. Now that he's POTUS, why hasn't he uphold on his campaign promise to release his tax details? Is it because of corruption in US government?
    6
  5436. Consider this question: Who is more qualified to lead the country? The People or The Government? If you answered The People, then why do countries still need The Government for?
    6
  5437.  Numinous Thought  I listened to serpentza claiming that he "loves China" but his actions, facial expressions, voice, all betray that he's lying when he says he loves China.
    6
  5438. Agreed. China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership. Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US short term leadership.
    6
  5439. Matt M. As I said, you have your opinion, and I have mine. Why are you trying to impose your opinion on me? I have highlighted my reasons regarding why I have my opinion, but all you done is disagree and tell me to believe what you believe that's all.
    6
  5440. Peng Shuai has appeared on IOC video call expressing her desire for her personal privacy to be respected, but the WTA is behaving like the paparazzi and demanding that she appear in public to bare her private affairs for all the world to see.
    6
  5441. So USA and former Soviet Union collected moon soil not for science? Or only when China does it, then it's not for science?
    6
  5442. Western style democracy actually has a history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, even the Republic of Rome eventually crumbled. These early democracies weren't successful, and democracy wasn't even popular throughout the rest of the ancient world, since most ancient nations adopted authoritarian forms of government such as monarchy. Such authoritarian systems were predominant because they were stable and they worked (generally). Modern Western democracy is a different breed, but it means that it only has some 100-200 years of history, and isn't guaranteed to be successful in the future. In fact, for most of the past 1000-2000 years of history, most of humanity was under authoritarian rule.
    6
  5443. Shenzhen’s economic growth surpassed Hong Kong's in 2017. Source: Shenzhen surpasses US$338 billion GDP mark in 2017, beats Hong Kong and Singapore’s growth scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2128310/shenzhen-88-cent-hi-tech-growth-roll-hit-y2tr-2017 Shenzhen is roughly the same economic size as Singapore and Hong Kong, but recorded nominal output of 2.2 trillion yuan (US$338 billion) in 2017 thanks to its booming hi-tech sector. Over 40% of the output came from “innovative” businesses such as internet, biotech and telecom..
    6
  5444.  @erroreliminator2.076  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    6
  5445. @sunflower I think Beijing's hosting of the 2022 Winter Olympics should be applauded given the difficulties in ensuring the safety of athletes while in the midst of a Covid pandemic.
    6
  5446. China developed our own turbine blades made from single-crystal rhenium superalloy, that can withstand the high temperatures necessary in jet engines. Our jet engine technology has even attracted interest from Germany (a well-respected engineering country) and there have been talks of sales. China in talks for sale of jet engine technology to Germany Video: youtube.com/watch?v=_QTS-aAqMwU
    6
  5447. @North Korea Is Best Korea It was the former Soviet Union that gotten involved in Afghanistan, not Russia as it is today. As for Syria, it was after an official request by the Syrian government for military assistance against rebels.
    6
  5448. puchy110 Taiwan won't risk it alone. But what if the US joins in? Currently the Taiwan president is trying to cosy up with Trump so who knows what they may be up to. Will Taiwan think it can take on China by dragging the US into a world war?
    5
  5449. +puchy110 Yes, it was a short battle where both sides claimed victory. Keep in mind that China never intended to take control of Vietnam. We marched all the way to Hanoi but what happens if we take Hanoi? Do we declare North Vietnam as part of China? Can we afford to face both the Soviet Russia and South Vietnam or will be trapped by them? Vietnamese only wanted independence, from French Rule and American Rule (Why the heck are Americans there in the first place?) We believe we did the right thing by retreating and leaving Vietnam. There were a few skirmishes but as soon as Vietnam realized we weren't going to threaten them, the battles ended. Vietnam was independent. This may sound too altruistic to be true. But if you notice, China did not invade any other territory after the Sino-Vietnamese conflict. China was focusing on resolving internal issues.
    5
  5450. +UserX-1099 How is simplified Chinese related to the Romanization of Chinese? Romanization of Chinese is the use of English letters to simulate Chinese pronunciation like the Pinyin system and has little to do with Simplified Chinese.
    5
  5451. If China wins, it gets control of the South China Sea and its resources. More importantly, it's image will change, either for the better or the worst. If US wins, then it gets the resources, China gets demilitarized, a democracy gets installed and it will be just another US puppet. Either way, its too risky for China to wage war over some resources. There are plenty of alternatives elsewhere.
    5
  5452. Actually, China made declaration with the UNCLOS in 2006 not to accept some of the compulsory procedures provided. Many countries including the United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, France, Canada, and Spain made similar declarations. (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippines_v._China#Optional_exceptions_to_applicability_of_compulsory_procedure)
    5
  5453. +Evan Tansimore Opps, my bad. Perhaps it would be funnier in Chinese? 用汉语来说比较好笑; “你们再讲什么漢字？看来看去都是汉字。 XD”
    5
  5454. Anyone can see that Korea today is shadow of former self. Just look at map of Korea today compared to the past. 1/2 of Korea's entire land and resources are locked up in North Korea. About 1/3 of entire Korean population is in N. Korea and many Korean families separated by division. Ancient Korea is not the same as modern Korea. Take look at map of Goguryeo for example. Majority of its territory is in North East China (Liaoning province) and North Korea today, so can Goguryeo really be considered Korean history? Goguryeo ruins are found in China and N. Korea, while Silla and Baekje kingdoms located in S. Korea today. So is Goguryeo really considered Korean kingdom if most of its history is on Chinese soil? In comparison, China today is stronger and more unified than we were before. We have access to greater territories and resources than in the past, and our population is mostly unified, except along Taiwan, Hong Kong. A country is strong when united, and weak when divided and fighting itself internally.
    5
  5455. +PrankFrank Why you keep repeat the same few points over and over and expect other people to believe you? Just because you keep repeating it? 1) Whether the goods are intermediary or not, Korean exports to China are worth US$124.4 billion, while export to USA is worth $66.8 billion. UK is less than $10 billion, and rest of Europe is not even mentioned at all in this article below. I don't know how you can still outright lie about Europeans being South Korea's major market over China and still expect people to believe you. South Korea's Top Trading Partners worldstopexports(dot)com/south-koreas-top-import-partners/ 2) Jeju is island south of Korea, and increased domestic tourists simply means more local Korean tourists visit the Island instead of Chinese tourists. This means money only circulate within Korea, and not between foreign tourists and Korea. Jeju doing well, but that doesn't represent the rest of S. Korea. American and European tourist percentage increases are still insignificant compared to Chinese tourists. In 2016, Korea has seen almost 7 000 000 Chinese tourists and only 600 000 US tourists, and negligible amount of European tourists. *What are the small percentage increase in US and European tourists going to matter when compared to decreases in Chinese tourists? 3) FlashMemory? Just come down to Shenzhen and you can find dozens varieties of flash drives for sale, made by Chinese companies locally. America and Europe may use Apple and Samsung, but China is world's largest mobile phone market, with 1 300 000 000 users, compared to USA's 300 000 000 users. This is reason why foreign mobile phone companies keep trying tap into Chinese market. Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by number of mobile phones in use
    5
  5456. China also recently completed the world's largest radio telescope 天眼 Tiānyǎn meaning Eye of the Heavens
    5
  5457. hiroanz Lets hope it doesn't come to it. War costs a lot of money which could be spent instead on improving US economic situation.
    5
  5458. +Siyuan Guo China had been fighting Japanese alone since 1937, 5 years prior to Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor but most western media focus on the point when USA joined the war. Western powers (League of Nations) did not consider China important enough and allowed Japan to claim more and more Chinese territory for 5 years before joining in. Even then, it was because of Pearl Harbor that they joined in.
    5
  5459. Many other claimants claim territories in the South China Sea as well. Otherwise, there will be no dispute at all right?
    5
  5460. +DarkZerol The latest N.K missile test could have "failed" because maybe Kim really doesn't want war with USA, but he doesn't want to back down and lose face too. So he make the missile misfire on purpose... ....or maybe he's really not that cunning and the test really failed because of US intervention?
    5
  5461. +Justin Chaquo There is no official proof, only speculation by Chinese netizens. The government has always issued statement saying China oppose N. K missile test, but is always slow to respond. So why did President Xi Jinping suddenly implement policies like "cancel all flights to Pyongyang" and "reject N. K coal shipment", so quickly after the meeting with Trump? These policies need time to plan and implement, but they were done almost instantaneous after the US-China meeting. One reason could be that the government planned this ahead, since Trump has been constantly announcing on Western media that he plans to talk to China about North Korea. So President Xi had time ahead to plan on his response to Trump before meeting him, to coincide with our goals. Or maybe President Trump, with zero political experience, somehow managed to convince President Xi, with 20+ years of political experience, to do something about N.K that Obama and previous POTUS failed to do. Anyway, this is just my speculation as Chinese.
    5
  5462. +PEDRO North and South Korea were created by Western powers not China. Korea was originally unified under Joseon dynasty, but after Japanese surrender, it was split into North Korea (Soviet Union) and South Korea (USA). N. Korea tried to unify Korea, and almost succeeded (90%), but was prevented by USA intervention. China only joined in the war when USA and S. Korea went beyond 38 parallel and began threatening Chinese border provinces (Liao Ning). So why are you blaming China for something that the Western powers created? Why did Korea had to be divided in first place? If there was no division, then there is no North and South Korea and therefore, no invasion by the North.
    5
  5463.  @garam6555  Why do you think that reunification with the mainland is a step backward for Taiwan? Taiwan used to be one of Four Asian Tigers but since democracy was introduced to Taiwan, it's economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving for jobs in the mainland or Singapore. Video:youtu.be/P3BCnPb8qHY "From the '90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreements on policy matters. This produced less effective policy making. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be more conservative in Taiwan, so they do not enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou, Research Fellow, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica
    5
  5464.  @garam6555  Majority of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo I agree. But if you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. So since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution, and if the majority of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo, it means that they prefer Taiwan being part of China according to it's constitution. You mentioned Taiwan's spirit and savvy innovation, but where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? Take smartphones for example and mainland China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Vivo, Realme, OnePlus, Tecno, etc Here's a list of the Top 10 Mobile Phone Brands in World 2021 Ranking List (Published by MBA Skool Team) Top 10 Mobile Phone Brands in World 2021 Ranking List Rank 1. Samsung (South Korean) Rank 2. Huawei (Chinese) Rank 3. Apple (American) Rank 4. Xiaomi (Chinese) Rank 5. Oppo (Chinese) Rank 6. Vivo (Chinese) Rank 7. LG (South Korean) Rank 8. ZTE (Chinese) Rank 9. Lenovo (Chinese) Rank 10. Realme (Chinese) ... Source: MBA Skool But where's examples of innovation in Taiwan in comparison to the mainland? Yet you're claiming Taiwan is like the mainland without the repressive cult-like government?
    5
  5465. If you are referring to those young Hong Kong protestors, majority of them were just students, haven't even graduate from school, yet they already think they know the best way to govern Hong Kong already? Even better than the older generation?
    5
  5466. ​ @elanor2123  I am ultimately a person of logic and facts over culture. Why can't I use those names since they fit the analogy? The U.S is really behaving like a village bully with his harem of concubines (i.e NATO countries) that follow his lead, therefore I think the names fit those roles and the analogy is appropriate. You said: "Then with the same logic, the whole world can be referred to as those names, lol" That's possible as well. You're welcome to come up with your own analogies using whatever names you choose, yet instead here you are complaining about my analogy and the names given to those countries? You said: "Do you think either country (U.S or Russia) would want the war to go out of hand?" Russia want's to bring the special military operation to a closure, but it appears that the United States is keen on fanning the flames of the conflict they started in Ukraine. The U.S is literally sending billions of dollars of lethal aid to Ukraine and it looks like their goal is to keep the Ukraine crisis going for as long as possible (to distract from domestic issues at home like inflation) You said: "Also, you should know that those oil/gas pipelines are one of the big places Russia profits from, and is a really important source of income which they would fight for, which is one of the many reasons Russia invaded Ukraine which they did not mention." Explain how did Russia had their military operation in Ukraine over the gas pipeline? Joe Biden literally threatened to cut off Nord Stream 2 pipeline supplying Russian gas to Germany, if Russia invaded Ukraine, so why would Russia do that then? You said: "And since a lot of European countries are afraid to act against Russia (although nearly all of them do), shouldn't it be a priority for countries who can influence the pipelines slowly take those countries out of Russia's influence?" EU countries literally depends on Russia for 40% of its energy needs, and it's actually this dependence that has fostered peace between Russia and Western Europe. Then why is it a "priority for countries" to upset this delicate balance between Russia and Western Europe? Putin had made it apparent that he wanted reassurances from NATO that it would not expand eastward (i.e that Ukraine not be allowed to join NATO). In fact, many NATO countries like France and Germany were reluctant to admit Ukraine into NATO (citing concerns over Ukraine government corruption issues) yet they refused to put this down in writing to reassure Putin. So after realizing that his words had fallen on deaf ears all these years, Putin finally decided to act. You said: "it is not an organization doing the U.S' bidding. Rather, it's an organization of Western powers combating socialism and communism, ," How is the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia combating socialism and communism? Or NATO's military intervention in Libya and Afghanistan and example of fighting socialism and communism? NATO is clearly serving the U.S interests in maintaining hegemonic dominance over the world. You said: "and a secondary organization for Western powers to discuss and take actions of things which weren't put into action of other bigger organizations," In other words, they are serving the U.S unilateral interests where multilateral organizations like UN made decisions not to. So the U.S is against multilateralism when the results goes against its own interests. You said: "Your next point consists entirely of statistics..and statistics does not mean everything, since they do not mention any of the small details or processes, but summarizes the outcome." You've just literally proven that statistics mean everything in the long run since they summarize the outcome. You said: "Russia devoted its attention on Ukraine in order to fully turn Ukraine into one of their territories, to be nearly indistinguishable from Russia." Back then, both Russia and Ukraine were part of the Soviet Union so what's wrong with them being indistinguishable? Even before the creation of the USSR, Ukrainians and Russians shared a common ancestry and much of Eastern Ukraine was part of the Russian Empire earlier. The name Ukraine is the old Slavic term for "borderland" after all and even Putin has stated that Ukrainians and Russians were originally one people if you look at the history. You said: "So, basically they wanted Ukraine to become a testing ground for their new (some dangerous) technologies, a place to leech off profits later on to invest in other areas, a strategically important location both economically and militarily." Could you list some examples of dangerous technologies that the communists tested in Ukraine? Or how exactly are "profits leeched off" to invest in other areas? Under the communists, there was no such thing as "profit" so what are you referring to by "profits" and what were they put to use in investing in? Ukraine is indeed a strategically important location both economically and militarily, that's why the Soviets stationed many Soviet troops, weapons and nukes in Ukraine. When the USSR collapsed, suddenly the ownership of these soldiers, weapons and nukes transferred from Russia to Ukraine, (that's why I said Russia left Ukraine with property in my analogy). After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Ukraine held about one third of the Soviet nuclear arsenal. You said: "I wonder why you did not point out how many innocent lives were lost during its period under the USSR, the unfortunate events in history which scarred Ukraine up to this day" I keep asking you, why can't you point to me what horrible things Russia did to Ukraine? You're being so vague, you can't even pinpoint a single particular event, you just claim Russia did horrible things to Ukraine without any concrete examples whatsoever. What's the "dangerous" technology that the Soviet Union tested in Ukraine you tell me? You said: ", the fact that 90% of the people spoke out for their country's independence although ur statistics imply they should've been happy, the living memories and stories of countless people's experiences, and many many more.." Speaking out for their independence doesn't equal to the Russians treating the Ukrainians badly, it could be because Ukrainians have developed a sense of self-identity. You're just speculating without any concrete examples of the Russians doing horrible things to the Ukrainians, I mean, why can't you cite me any examples?
    5
  5467.  @rebelmango2141  The withdrawal of Russian forces from the Kyiv region is a gesture of goodwill to create favourable conditions for Russia-Ukraine talks. Even the Ukrainian side has acknowledged this. But the peace talks were torpedoed with the arrival of Boris Johnson to Istanbul.
    5
  5468.  @motherlandbot6837  Many Indians (not all) suffer from the "colonial mentality" as a result of being a former British colony. Even after the British left and India has decolonized, the "decolonization of the mind" needs to happen to reverse the mental conditioning that colonizers inflict on the minds of the colonized. Only then can Indians truly be free of the colonial mentality.
    5
  5469.  @vaginaflop7523  Which part of the whole picture did I miss out? And about the Malaysian plane getting shot down in Donetsk and Luhansk, there are Ukrainian ultra-nationalist, neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion that have been deployed to those two regions to shell the people there, have you considered the possibility that perhaps the plane was shot down by the Ukrainian Army there?
    5
  5470. @gregpeterson3144 HarmonyOS enjoys several advantages over Android. HarmonyOS uses a micro kernel while Android is a monolithic kernel. The kernel is the heart and skeleton of a system and a micro kernel has many layers that never come into contact with each other during operation. Micro kernels are not only safer than monolithic kernels, but are also less complex. Huawei has made it clear that Harmony OS was written using 1/1000 of the lines of Android code.
    5
  5471.  @jimwu9121  I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, and I was appalled at the sheer amount of Western anti-China propaganda out there. Whenever I bring up China's achievements, many Westerners just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill and told me "Go back to China if you like it there!" It's like these Westerners claim to know more about China than me, even though many of them never actually set foot in China and see what life is like here for themselves. Whereas I literally grew up in China.
    5
  5472.  @chrishamlin5863  You should see videos of how the inmates of Guantanamo Bay were treated.
    5
  5473.  @eshwarashawn4493  China actually invited India to join in mutual prosperity on board the Belt and Road Initiative. But India rejected China's offer, so it can't be helped.
    5
  5474.  @sam-1-USA  Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or leisure. I mean, everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your country, how's this not free at all? Every country has heard of Chinese international student enrolling in their schools and universities, studying the same topics as their local peers, how's this not free at all? You really think some Freedom Index Score is accurate when it comes to China?
    5
  5475.  @yslee1401  The 14th Dalai Lama was found to have accepted American money to carry out separatist activities in Tibet. A total of $1,735,000 (equivalent to $17,044,700 in 2023) was spent on the Tibetan program in 1964. We know this from declassified CIA files regarding Tibet, so here's actual proof of a foreign country meddling in China's internal affairs.
    5
  5476.  @ashpatel2505  "India hasn’t invaded or colonized any country!" Manipur regained its separate identity in 1947 but was reunified with India on 1949. Nagaland was inaugurated into India in 1963. Goa was annexed by India in 1961. Sikkim was occupied by the Indian Army in 1975 and was annexed into India. Even today, India continues to eye its neighbor, Pakistan's territory of Kashmir. "Do you know how many companies in U.K are owned by Indians and what is the ethnicity of U.K. Prime Minister?" Less than a thousand? Also, they are based in the UK and they contribute to British economy, not Indian economy. Whereas if you compare with China, there are numerous Chinese companies owned by Chinese and they include big brands like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Vivo, Oppo, DJI, and so on. The British PM Rishi Sunak is a British national, and he wasn't elected by the people of the UK. And he doesn't care about India, like during the King's coronation ceremony, some of the crown jewels were stolen from India decades ago, yet he keeps silent about it. "How many global and S&P 500 companies have Indian CEOs?" A company having an Indian CEO doesn't mean that that company is Indian owned. Microsoft has an Indian-American CEO, but the company is most definitely American, not Indian. How many Indian companies have made it onto the Top 500 companies?Did you know that China has the most companies (145) in the Fortune Global 500 companies, and that US is 2nd place with 124 companies? "India is trusted by most countries in the world, but the same can not be said about China." China has brokered many deals across the globe. Just look at the rapprochement deal between Saudi Arabia and Iran. What has India done in comparison?
    5
  5477. People just need more exposure to the different ethnicities of various countries.
    5
  5478.  @truenorthstrongandfree3699  "Experts estimate between 60,000 and 100,000 organs are transplanted annually," So it's just an estimate by so-called "experts" Kilgour and Gutmann? According to the World Health Organization, the whole world conducted 146,840 organ transplants in 2018 (see source below), yet you're saying that China alone conducts up to 100,000 organ transplants annually? Based on an estimate by two so-called experts? Source: Global number of organ transplantations in 2018 statista.com/statistics/398645/global-estimation-of-organ-transplantations/ 1.5 million kidney transplants? Imagine the logistics needed to conduct such a huge volume of transplants, the number of doctors, surgeons, the number of hospital beds, operating tables and medical facilities, and you're saying that China alone can perform as many transplants as the whole world? Are you sure that these so-called experts, Kilgour and Gutmann, didn't just exaggerate the figure by 10 times? Because how's it feasible for China to perform as many transplants as the whole world?
    5
  5479.  @noelborbon6155  "神州 Shenzhou An occupied country as a result of World War 2. But many of its elites since the 19th century has been educated in major American and European universities" The two statements are not mutually exclusive. It's possible for people in a country to receive an education in America and European universities, without the need for the country to be occupied by a foreign power.
    5
  5480. Meanwhile, Westerners are teaching fish how to swim youtu.be/vT4z4TCf4uk
    5
  5481. There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, it was only detected by Chinese government. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    5
  5482.  @kaiki8490  The irony is that Christianity originated in the Middle East.
    5
  5483.  Numinous Thought  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    5
  5484.  @Conserpov  Agreed. But for people who don't know anything about miltary stuff, they might claim it's a Russian cruise missile. A Russian cruise missile would probably level the entire building instead of just leaving a massive hole in structure, not to mention that Russian cruise missiles are often fired in salvos (like at the NATO training facility housing foreign fighters), not a single lone missile.
    5
  5485. Putin isn't really as aggressive to the West as some may think. After all, even after the barrage of sanctions on Russia by the West, Russia still continues to supply EU countries with Russian gas till today. Also, Ukraine's modern borders were drawn up by the Bolsheviks and they included a huge chunk of Russian land (i.e Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, etc). Putin also stated that Ukrainians and Russians (and Belorussians) were "one people" that share a common heritage, known as Kievan Rus.
    5
  5486.  @thucduyen9592  The border dispute between India and China can be resolved if they abolish the McMahon line (drawn by Henry McMahon) and redraw the boundaries according to the historical borders between India and China. But India still sticks to the British-drawn McMahon line as the actual border.
    5
  5487.  @thomasward00  The United States have so many US military bases on South Korean soil. Meanwhile, China has ZERO military bases on North Korean soil. So isn't South Korea being the lapdog of USA here?
    5
  5488.  @2111dom  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    5
  5489.  @boknow5506  You said: "lots of reasons one being history bc china isn't great" China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    5
  5490.  @MarkYeung1  Could you show me where did Jimmy Carter said that? After the Sino-Vietnam War, the U.S felt that they had successfully turned China away from the Soviet Union, and U.S-China economic relations began to flourish as a result. The Sino-Vietnam War was a punitive action undertaken by China in exchange for better economic relations with the U.S.
    5
  5491. The premise of Squid Game is literally "capitalism at work", where some rich shadowy organization targets desperate people in debt, and lures them with an attractive prize to participate in deadly competition. All for entertainment purposes it appears.
    5
  5492.  @luanaspa4400  "Look at Tibet and Hong Kong." Tibet was part of China since 800 year ago back when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated them into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during the Qing Dynasty. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty and Qing Dynasty and Tibet is part of Chinese history, as well as a part of China today after 1951. Regarding Hong Kong, I already mentioned that Hong Kong was part of China till Great Britain took it and made it into a colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    5
  5493. President Xi can safeguard his ideas through teaching Xi Jinping Thought to our kids in school, and hopefully foster a new generation of Chinese leaders to emerge and take up the mantle of leadership after he is gone. But of course, Western MSM is giving Xi Jinping Thought a negative spin in their negative portrayals of China's education system.
    5
  5494. It's sad that for some people who left Hong Kong to migrate to Canada, they still carry with them the baggage of "colonial mentality" and continue to worship everything Anglo-Saxon, while belittling anything non-white. I hope such individuals learn to recognize the colonizer's intentions controlling their actions and learn to break free from it through decolonization of the mind.
    5
  5495. Many Chinese travel to Africa for investment opportunities, and building infrastructure like roads, railways, bridges, tunnels.
    5
  5496.  @drmodestoesq  China actually help Vietnam fight for independence from France during the 1st Indochina War. During the 1st Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help Vietnam fight for independence from the French. Source: First Indochina War wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Indochina_War#China From 1950 to 1954, the Chinese government shipped goods, materials, and medicine worth $43 billion (in 2019 dollars) to Vietnam. From 1950 to 1956, the Chinese government had also shipped 155,000 small arms, 58 million rounds of ammunition, 4,630 artillery pieces, 1,080,000 artillery shells, 840,000 hand grenades, 1,400,000 uniforms, 1,200 vehicles, 14,000 tons of food, and 26,000 tons of fuel to Vietnam. But some Vietnamese nationalists convieni forgot Chinese aid given to them, and some falsely claimed that they won their independence all by themselves.
    5
  5497.  @RedHanded1969  Over 100 officials of provincial-ministerial level and above have been implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China, which began after the 18th Party Congress in 2012. Source: Officials implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China (2012–2017) wikipedia.org/wiki/Officials_implicated_by_the_anti-corruption_campaign_in_China_(2012%E2%80%932017)#:~:text=Over,2012
    5
  5498.  @LisbonLion7  You said: "FYI the main playbook the US uses is called The Art of War." Then why'd the USA hasn't won any war since 1945 (which was actually won by others)? Just recently, the mighty U.S army lost the nearly 20-year Afghan War against a bunch of insurgents and had to withdraw from Kabul much like they did in Saigon at the end of Vietnam War.
    5
  5499.  @rpg1663  "If you don't have short memory, you should remember that Taiwan like 30 years ago," Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for half it's life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who tolerated no dissent in Taiwan, jailing and executing dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time.
    5
  5500.  @rpg1663  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established ROC, China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    5
  5501.  @firmaith  Zelenskyy being Jewish doesn't automatically grant him immunity to supporting Nazis. During WWII, there were Jewish people who were Nazi collaborators. One famous example is George Soros who's Jewish and collaborated with the Nazis and he never regretted any of it. Another example is Georg Karaski, a Jewish collaborator in Nazi Germany.
    5
  5502.  @firmaith  About the U.S naval presence maintaining free shipping lanes, China never asked USA to patrol the South China Sea, they do it of their own accord. If it cost more for USA to maintain shipping lanes in the Pacific, then why is USA doing that? Why not U.S withdraw their naval presence and allow Chinese ships to sail and protect our own shipping lanes? Chinese warships Additionally, the United States doesn't even ratify UNCLOS (UN Convention on the Law of the Sea) itself, so why is the USA carrying out "freedom of navigation" patrols in the South China Sea in UNCLOS's name, when it's not even a party to UNCLOS itself?
    5
  5503. Trump says: China is copying America' declining birth rates!
    5
  5504.  @maicholaa7482  The worst kind of anti-China people are those who always use the same stale excuse of "I'm not anti-China, I'm just anti-CPC" to defend themselves and justify their anti-China stance. I've heard this excuse so many times but the truth is that these anti-China people don't care about China's interests, nor do they actually want to see China succeed that's all.
    5
  5505.  @fannyalbi9040  Haven't you heard of President Xi Jinping's words towards environmental protection? Xi Jiping said: "Clear waters and green mountains are as valuable as gold and silver mountains" (绿水青山就是金山银山) Video: President Xi in environmental call for 'clear waters and green mountains' youtu.be/49KYKZascmo
    5
  5506.  @farhanaf832  Of course. China is the world's leading exporter of solar panels with at least 80% of the global market share in solar manufacturing capacity, while the United States is the world's largest importer.
    5
  5507. @Chishio Chishio You're saying that he works for the Chinese government, but Cyrus' message is about peaceful cooperation between the US and China, then isn't this a positive message for the world?
    5
  5508. @Chishio Chishio Why does Cyrus include sponsors on his videos, if according to you he works for the Chinese government? It just doesn't make sense.
    5
  5509. @Sheriff Lobo Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in mass starvation. Even Chairman Mao couldn't control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    5
  5510. @Sheriff Lobo Chinese farmers only targeted the sparrows that ate grain. But Chinese farmers reared locust eating livestock like chickens and ducks, and their rice fields have insect-eating fishes and frogs in them, what makes you think locusts don't have natural predators?
    5
  5511. @Sheriff Lobo Below are 10 countries that exported the highest dollar value worth of toilet paper in rolls during 2020 and China exported the most in the world. 1. China: US$921.2 million 2. Germany: $320.4 million 3. Italy: $209.2 million 4. Canada: $199.1 million 5. Mexico: $198.1 million 6. Sweden: $197.4 million 7. France: $183.5 million 8. Poland: $176.6 million 9. United States: $173.5 million 10. El Salvador: $156.8 million .... Yet you're claiming Shanghai'S toilets doesn't have toilet paper?
    5
  5512.  @Carbuncle0168  You claim Taiwan is a country, then why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations or the World Health Organization? Is there some force that's stopping Taiwan from joining the UN or the WHO?
    5
  5513.  @yuanfangli9272  But why should it be put up to a vote for Chinese to express our support? The joint survey by Harvard University and Ash Center have shown that around 80-90% of Chinese people support the Communist Party of China, so why should China call a vote, simply because you claim Chinese people don't like the CPC?
    5
  5514.  @yuanfangli9272  "神州 Shenzhou China has been number one in the world for thousands of years, please leave the Communist Party." And throughout 5,000 years of Chinese history, China has always been under the authoritarian rule of Emperors and the Imperial Court. China is among the oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt eventually succumbed to history. Because China has been under authoritarian rule all this time, as we are today under President Xi Jinping and the Communist Party of China, because China is at our best under a strong, centralized government (as history has shown).
    5
  5515.  @stephenstrange4239  But if we look at Chinese history, China was a naval superpower during the Ming Dynasty in around 1400 AD. Admiral Zheng He made seven voyages visiting Africa, India and the Middle East, leading an armada of 300 ships. Some of these treasure ships were about 5-7 times the size of Christopher Columbus' Santa Maria. But Zheng He's armada was actually a merchant convoy, trading Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, porcelain (i.e fine china) in exchange for exotics animals like giraffes. Clearly, China wasn't interested in colonizing other countries unlike the Western colonial era that followed later. Given that China has such a peaceful attitude despite having immense naval power at that time, why do you presume China will follow in the U.S footsteps sooner or later?
    5
  5516. +Andrew Chen Didn't the people of Taiwan voted against pro-independence DPP in the Taiwan midterm elections, and in the end, the pro-independence Taiwan President Tsai resigned because of DPP's humiliating defeat and losing 2 of its posts to KMT? Doesn't this imply that majority of Taiwan people don't want independence, given that they voted against Tsai?
    5
  5517.  @user-kn2iz8ve2w  The 1979 Sino-Vietnamese skirmish was more of a punitive mission undertaken by Vice Premier Deng Xiaoping to punish Vietnam for their 1978 invasion of Kampuchea (Cambodia), overthrowing the Government of Kampuchea, and occupied Cambodia. It's been suggested that at that time, U.S President Jimmy Carter wanted to widen the Sino-Soviet split, so he made a deal with Deng that if China punished Vietnam (a Soviet ally) then U.S-China relations would improve.
    5
  5518. "Don't March on Moscow" should have been paired with "Don't Bluff Beijing" for alliteration.
    5
  5519.  @edwardr8826  Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule for over 100 years, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were ever held by Hong Kong people while it was British colony. But despite the lack of democracy, Hong Kong flourished under authoritarian British rule and was a global finance hub and busiest port city closest to mainland China. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover to mainland China, did Hong Kong finally get to vote in elections for their favorite leader, and frankly speaking, Hong Kong's economy is suffering because of democracy, since the protests are getting out of hand and investors in Hong Kong are spooked by the instability and Hong Kong's economy is grinding to a halt because of the protest.
    5
  5520.  @geoeconomics5629  China has made 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to chart the course of China's direction. By abolishing the term limits, our leaders can remain in power long-term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. Same thing goes for Russia, their President has been in power long enough to make long-term plans for Russia's future. Whereas the US President has to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only make short-term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more.
    5
  5521.  @brianlove8413  "for the most part, your statement is untrue." Which statement of mine are you referring to that you claim is untrue? That the mindset is still difficult to change? How is this statement false when mindsets are not easy to change?
    5
  5522.  @gregmiller8284  Far as I know, neither Russia nor China have expressed interest in ruling the entire world. At the most, Russia and China seek dominance in their respective spheres of influence. Eastern Europe for Russia and East Asia for China. Whereas it's the United States that's hell bent on preserving it's hegemonic rule over the entire world, from North and South America to the Middle East and Asia. Multipolarity is when countries have multiple sides to follow, whereas unipolarity is when countries have no choice but to pick one side. The Soviet Union joined the Allies after being attacked by Nazi Germany. Likewise, the United States was largely uninvolved in WWII until Pearl Harbour. However, it doesn't change the fact that being able to choose sides is a form of multipolarity.
    5
  5523.  @vivafreedom4947  Cost of living in China is still (generally) cheaper than living in the West. China is buying cheap Russian gas at a discount, while Europeans have to ration energy for the upcoming winter. As for paying off apartments, China is a country of homeowners with more than 90% of households owning homes (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations (Huang et al., 2020). Whereas the rate of homeownership in the U.S. dropping to the lowest point since 1965 (63% in 2017)
    5
  5524.  @robertjustinoff845  "Remember, Russia is still a nuclear power." Yeah, so is the United States of America. In fact, there's only one country in the world to have launched a nuclear strike, namely on Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
    5
  5525.  @michaeljames2349  "The Russians were defeated at every turn!" If that's the case then how did the 4 oblasts of Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia end up joining the Russian Federation? "Also did you forget the rocket attacks on civilians?" You mean when Russia's border town of Belgorod was attacked by missiles from Ukraine?
    5
  5526.  @mattyghost3409  What hypersonic weapons does Taiwan island have? The DF-ZF hypersonic glide vehicle has been flight-tested by China seven times, and is capable of traveling between 6,000 to 12,000 kmh to strike a target with precision in a hour.
    5
  5527. According to the above animation, Covid-19 isn't even that deadly compared to SARS and MERS, yet its highly infectious nature has led to more people contracting it and thus, more deaths as a result.
    5
  5528.  @msimon6808  You said: ""Do you support Taiwan independence?" Only the Taiwanese want that." Surveys in Taiwan have revealed that only a minority (5.6%) of the people of Taiwan want independence and the overwhelming majority (87%) want the status quo to continue. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China, so any move to declare independence would be seen as changing the status quo.
    5
  5529.  @dawei666  Yes, I just read up on the issue, it seems that no one actually knows Meng's crime. They just arrest the person and later fabricate the crime.
    5
  5530.  @yodesuyo  China and India are fighting desertification, even NASA satellite images have shown that the Earth is greener today thanks to the efforts of Chinese and Indians.
    5
  5531.  @anmolpatel793  China already has more cinema screens than America and we are home to the world's largest film studio in Hengdian province Video: The Largest Outdoor Film Studio is Actually in China youtu.be/pWjsD-tJ9ss China's film industry is growing rapidly and films are catering their content to suit Chinese tastes so what's wrong with my point of wanting to see more Asian actors on Hollywood film? I want to see more Asian actors/actresses take the lead in Hollywood films, helping dispell Asian stereotypes.
    5
  5532.  @Andy-P In the Korean War, the U.S (together with South Korea, U.K, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, + 12 other countries) fought to a standstill against China (with only North Korea for allies), yet you still think think the U.S will win? And mind you, the People's Liberation Army today is far more advanced that it was during the Korean War. Even today, NATO and Ukraine are unable to defeat Russia, yet you still think the U.S will win?
    5
  5533. Haruka ino My source is based on 2018, not 2017, so why are you bringing 2017 up? China's suicide rates are still lower than Japan's so wheres your proof that "China just recently passed Japan on suicide rates"?
    5
  5534.  @Tony-tb3yf  "this letter 「鬼岛」you typed，shows you are a communist Chinese" Even the name Taiwan (台灣) uses simplified Chinese characters, the character 台 has been simplified from 臺, otherwise Taiwan should be 臺灣 in true traditional Chinese characters. Also, simplified characters were considered back as early as the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period and earlier, it's not exclusive to "communist Chinese" and even today, other countries like Singapore uses simplified Chinese characters.
    5
  5535. Agreed. China and Russia are working towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US and its "allies")
    5
  5536.  @michaels4255  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Wars are disruptive. Those deaths were mostly due to famine and disease, not from any intent to harm civilians." The American-Philippine war wouldn't even be necessary had the Americans simply granted the Filipinos independence after the Spanish-American war. Instead, at least 200,000 Filipino civilians were killed as a result of this war, and atrocities and war crimes were committed during the conflict, including torture, mutilation, and executions. In retaliation for Filipino guerrilla warfare tactics, the U.S. carried out reprisals and scorched earth campaigns, and forcibly relocated many civilians to concentration camps, where thousands died.
    5
  5537.  @Ace-mw9pm  "神州 Shenzhou yes 14 years fighting Japan, It only took America 3 to beat them." That's because 14 years of fighting by the Chinese had severely weakened the Japanese forces. Remember that America did not join in WW2 against the Japanese until Pearl Harbor was bombed, so it was certainly not for China's sake that U.S joined WW2.
    5
  5538.  @Ace-mw9pm  America's oil embargo on Japan was in 1941, whereas Chinese had already been fighting against Japan since 1931 (after their invasion of Manchuria) and that's why Japanese forces were weakened during their fight with China. And once again, the U.S joined China against Japan only because Pearl Harbor was bombed, not for China's sake. If they did, they would have slapped embargo right when the Japanese invaded Manchuria in 1931. Also, even today Japan is still colonized by the Americans. There are some 55,000 U.S troops stationed in Japan and Japan is still bound by the surrender treaty, Article 9 of the Japanese constitution, to only maintain a a small "self-defense" force as their military. And this is not by choice, the Japanese had to agree to host foreign troops as part of their surrender treaty.
    5
  5539.  @Ace-mw9pm  "神州 Shenzhou the embargo was for china's sake " The U.S embargo was placed on Japan some 10 years after Japan invaded Manchuria, so it wasn't for China's sake. The U.S was content to let Japan conquer more and more Chinese territory from 1931-1941, and U.S only joined China against Japan because Pearl Harbor was bombed. And U.S stationing troops in Japan is basically the same as colonizing it. The people in Okinawa protest the U.S base but the Japanese governor cannot do anything to eject U.S troops from Japan, because it would violate the WWII surrender treaty.
    5
  5540. Journalists under cover won't use their real name like Isabelle Young in their ID so blatantly, since it will blow their cover. These people literally lied to get into Xinjiang, in order to paint a horrible picture of Xinjiang, when there's hasn't been any riots in Xinjiang for years since this project was started. Who was that mysterious "Uighur" voice that she interviewed on board that train? They can't find any condemning footage, so they try to manufacture unnamed witnesses to make China look bad is that it?
    5
  5541. Back then, the USA accuse mainland China of potentially abusing the Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now scrapped). Now the USA turn around and abuse their own extradition bill with Canada with Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou. The USA accuse others of doing things that they themselves are done. The sheer irony!
    5
  5542. BBC = British Bash China CBC = Canadians Bash China CNN = China Negative News WION = We Indians Only Negative (about China)
    5
  5543.  @88jaycool  Well now that Trump's gone and the economic deal didn't seem to pull through, what's the Biden administration's stance towards Meng's detention? Seems like Biden hasn't so much as uttered a word to Canadian PM Trudeau regarding Meng's arrest. More Canadians need to realize they can't keep kowtowing to the United States.
    5
  5544.  @MrJonbelt  Michael Spavor took photos and videos of Chinese military equipment on multiple occasions. These photos were subsequently sent illegally to various people outside of China, including Kovrig. Between 2017 and 2018, Kovrig entered China under the guise of a businessman and false pretext of commerce. Using this false identity, Kovrig gathered a large amount of information related to China’s national security, and wrote analytical reports to be sent to the International Crisis Group, (ICG). Contrary to popular belief, the ICG is not authorized to work in China as a legitimate NGO.
    5
  5545. China and India are world's two most populous countries. With such large student populations, competition in our countries for top schools and higher education is fierce and intense, and after graduation, there isn't guaranteed that there will be enough jobs for everyone. That's why so many overseas international students, IT experts, foreign researchers, etc, happen to be Chinese and Indian. We should be cooperating to solve problems common to both our countries instead of fighting over border disputes.
    5
  5546.  @currentchannel3452  If you claim Cyrus is paid by China to promote his peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" then isn't that a positive thing for the world? U.S-China relations have deteriorated to their lowest points in months, and a potential hot war would not only be deleterious for both our countries, but for the rest of the world as well, so promoting the alternative message of war is simply unthinkable.
    5
  5547.  @jonasgeist7779  So apparently, you're unable to refute my point, so you insinuate that I'm getting points just because my views happen to differ from yours? Why not attack my points instead?
    5
  5548.  @xpro2009  You said: "Maybe it would be appreciated more if they and spend more of their living times on board the train." Trains are a means to get to a destination, why would they want to spend more of their living time on board the train? China is a vast country and the advent of high-speed train has helped shorten the travelling time for passengers from days to just hours. Trains are not only the only mode of transport, China also has bike sharing services that allow people to rent bikes to commute to places easily and conveniently. "They also have to transact with some government officials for permit of some sort or interact with authorities, Then there would lie the nightmare and severe headache." We only need to buy a train ticket that's all, what permit are you talking about? For example, during the Spring Festival (Chinese New Year), it's become the *world's largest annual human migration (even larger than Christmas migration) as people return to their home provinces to spend the new years in their home town. Thanks to the advent of high-speed trains, the long journey home has been shortened from weeks to days (and even from days to hours) Yet you're saying that hundreds of millions of Chinese have to all apply for a permit just to take the train? "These has become the norm, the unspoken standard procedure that people become so sick with it and could only wish to get out." Look, all you need to do is purchase a train ticket online (or at the kiosk if you desire), what's all this permit or red tape that you keep on alluding to? Could you give an example of one such permit or red tape?
    5
  5549.  @joeldeleon1466  The Philippines intentionally grounded a vessel (the Sierra Madre) onto the Second Thomas Shoal. In 1999, Philippine president Joseph Estrada promised that the vessel would be towed away. In 2014, the Chinese government asked the Philippines to remove the grounded ship. In 2017, China and the Philippines established a gentlemen's agreement that the status quo be maintained for the South China Sea. Under the status quo agreement, no construction materials are allowed to fortify the Sierra Madre. However, the Philippines violated the agreement and started sending construction materials to repair the rusting vessel.
    5
  5550. China has anti-ship ballistic missile DF-21 nicknamed "carrier killer" that is capable of targeting ships out at sea, from the safety of the land. One US aircraft carrier costing $15 billion can be sunk with just one DF21 costing just $1 million. Video:China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile youtube.com/watch?v=p-cEunmqXM8
    5
  5551.  @Raumance  The Soviet Union fought against Hitler during WWII, and Russians suffered the most casualties of WWII, as well as inflicting the most casualties onto Germany during WWII. If not for the Soviet Union during WWII, we would be speaking German.
    5
  5552.  @manimtimjahmilb.8079  You said Philippines don't claim what is clearly not yours? Then why Philippines claims Spratly Islands and Scarborough Shoals? When the Philippines gained independence from USA in 1946, the Americans reminded the Philippines that the Spratlys was NOT Philippine territory, because the Spratlys were not part of the Philippines per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America. But then in 1970s, Philippines dictator Marcos suddenly began incorporating the Spratly Islands as Philippines territory, even when it wasn't part of Philippines territory historically since the Spanish rule. So why Philippines claims territory that doesn't belong to it?
    5
  5553.  @manimtimjahmilb.8079  Have you seen what the Caucasians did to America? They stole an entire continent! causing genocide of Native Americans, occupying their lands (even till today) and import slaves from Africa to do laborious work for them! Yet you judge them on whether or not they steal fishing territories?
    5
  5554.  @mykrt8541  Exactly. Britain was a colonial superpower during the 19th century but was eventually overtaken by the United States in the 20th century as the world's largest economy. But from 1-1800 AD, it was China (and also India) that made up around 25% share of the world's GDP, according to studies by Angus Maddison. And it looks as though China is all set to dominate the 21st century.
    5
  5555.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Hong Kong government should have scrapped the extradition bill LONG AGO ." The Hong Kong Extradition Bill was indeed scrapped, but the Hong Kong riots still continued even after the bill was cancelled, then what more do the Hong Kong people want? The bill has been scrapped, yet the rioters continued their violence. And because the bill was scrapped, the Hong Kong murderer now roams free, because Hong Kong courts are powerless to convict a crime that occurred overseas in Taiwan, and there's no justice for the victim's family. You said: "There are many ways to solve the political issues regarding extradition. For example, Australia and China (who don't see eye to eye) seek help with each other regarding criminal cases" But Australia and China already have an existing extradition treaty. The Treaty on Extradition Between Australia and the People's Republic of China was signed on 6 September 2007, so how does your example work? However, Hong Kong and Taiwan do not have an extradition treaty (that's the primary reason the extradition bill was proposed) then how to solve the problem of extradition without a bill? Also, Hong Kong and Taiwan do see eye to eye, so why can't they have an extradition bill?
    5
  5556.  @KuangWen0  Now you're comparing me to Falun Gong and asking me to think logically? When I'm the one quoting data and statistics of Chairman Mao's contributions, whereas you're just making unsupported claims? Look there were numerous famines before the Great Chinese Famine, especially during Republic of China 🇹🇼 rule under Nationalist Kuomintang, such as during 1920–1921, 1928–1930, Sichuan famine 1936–1937, 1942–1943 Henan famine, and so on. They occurred back when landlords still owned the farmlands, then how does your theory of after giving land to farmers instead of group, no famine happens any more?
    5
  5557.  @KuangWen0  Look, you are the one making broad statements like (and I quote your earlier words) "All Chinese hate Chairman Mao for the great famine and cultural revolution." but it's apparent that you and mark yeung represent mostly overseas Chinese, or Chinese from Hong Kong or Taiwan, not actual mainland Chinese, then why do you presume to speak on behalf of the mainland Chinese?
    5
  5558. Koreans always claim nobody likes China, but then China is the 4th most visited country in the world, after France, USA and Spain, and the most visited Asian country (surpassing Japan and South Korea). So why claim nobody likes China?
    5
  5559. +forbidmyname How can you say for sure that nobody in the west wants to work or study in China? Obviously not everyone in USA can afford to go to Harvard or other top American universities, so some students may choose to study abroad in countries like China, which ranks 3rd overall among countries.
    5
  5560. Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. ... But its already 2019, and China's economy is still going strong, so why continue believe Western anti-China propaganda, when their economic predictions been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    5
  5561. +Justin Watson Exactly what are you talking about? When did I talk about Iraq, Libya or Afghanistan here at all? All I did was ask why are you being so rude and when did I say anything about Chinese being ungrateful at all here, so how are these little tricky questions?
    5
  5562. This is not really related, but Peking Opera has actors with all sorts of paints of them, from white to red to black, with special meanings behind those colors. Its just artistic expression that's all.
    5
  5563.  @oneviwatara9384  The aborigine people in Taiwan were descended from farmers from mainland China that arrived on the island some 5,000 years ago. Around 5,000 years ago, farmers from the southeast Chinese coast settled on the island. These people are believed to have been speakers of Austronesian languages, which dispersed from Taiwan across the islands of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The current Taiwanese aborigines are believed to be their descendants. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan)
    5
  5564.  @oneviwatara9384  "The PRC doesn't have any legitimated claimed over the South China Sea either hence the PRC was founded in 1949 whereas the Taiwan, Vietnam, Cambodia, Indonesia and Philippines was already a country centuries ago" The Republic of China 🇹🇼 published the Eleven-Dash Line in 1947 and the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 removed two dashes to arrive at the Nine-Dash Line claim. The Vietnam PM Pham van Dong had recognized that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958.
    5
  5565.  @oneviwatara9384  "Taiwan was already declared an independence country from the PRC since 1989 according to the former prime minister of Singapore but the PRC refused to accept Taiwan independence." Where is Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China.
    5
  5566.  @tammystewart10  True.
    5
  5567.  @Nesher92  Hong Kong is actually ranked among the world's most free. According to Freedom Index by Country 2020 Hong Kong is ranked 3rd in the world at 8.81. Source: worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/freedom-index-by-country According to Index of Economic Freedom, the top five "free" economies identified by the 2011 index were Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, and Switzerland, each scoring over 80 on the economic freedom grading scale. Since the Index was created in 1995, Hong Kong has been the top performing economy. Source: Index of Economic Freedom wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Economic_Freedom#Ratings So how exactly is Hong Kong lacking freedoms when they are ranked among the world's highest in terms of freedom?
    5
  5568. @nationalghost The KMT leader Chiang kai-shek was a dictator and tolerated no dissidents to his rule. He purged some 5,000-10,000 communists during the Shanghai Massacre of April 12, 1927, and when he ruled Taiwan, he also jailed and executed many of his political dissidents and rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) So how is KMT any different from CCP with regards to dealing with dissidents?
    5
  5569.  cantonpillow  About Chinese inventions, Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Route flowed Chinese luxury goods like slik, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china) that was in high demand by the rest of the ancient world.
    5
  5570. @nationalghost The bad weather conditions were well documented during the Great Chinese Famine. In July 1959, the Yellow River flooded in East China and according to Disaster Center, the flood directly killed, either through starvation from crop failure or drowning, an estimated 2 million people, while other areas were affected in other ways as well. Source: The Most Deadly 100 Natural Disasters of the 20th Century disastercenter.com/disaster/TOP100K.html In 1960, an estimated 60% of agricultural land in northern China received no rain at all and the Encyclopædia Britannica yearbooks from 1958 to 1962 also reported abnormal weather, followed by droughts and floods based on Chinese government sources. This included 760 millimetres (30 in) of rain in Hong Kong across five days in June 1959, part of a pattern that hit all of Southern China. As a result, year over year grain production dropped in China, which led to starvation of people in China.
    5
  5571. @nationalghost Hong Kong is part of China yes, but they have their own separate government different from mainland China, so why are you bringing up Hong Kong here? It was Hong Kong riot police who shot teargas and used pepper spray against the Hong Kong protestors, so what has that got to do with mainland Chinese police? You're running out of points so you just bring up Hong Kong out of no where?
    5
  5572. @nationalghost China publishes more scientific and technical journal articles in physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences, than even the United States. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_scientific_and_technical_journal_articles In 2016: 1. China (426,165 articles) <-- 2. United States (408,985 articles) 3. India (110,320 articles) 4. Germany (103,122 articles) 5. United Kingdom (97,527 articles) 6. Japan (96,536 articles) This implies that a growing number of scientific discoveries are being made in Chinese-language papers. So Chinese researchers hold the advantage here because they have access to Western English language research papers, but Western scientists might have difficulty with Chinese-language papers because of the language barrier.
    5
  5573. @nationalghost You think the West does not copy from others at some point in history? A century ago, it was United States that was plagiarizing Europe. Charles Dickens, who visited Boston in 1842 found the city's bookstores rife with pirated copies of his novels, along with those of his countrymen. Source: A nation of outlaws archive.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/26/a_nation_of_outlaws/ Here are some exerpts American food vendors tampered with their products en masse, bulking out supplies with cheap filler, using dangerous additives to mask spoilage or to give foodstuffs a more appealing color. Candy contained arsenic and dyed with copper chloride; brewers mixed strychnine, to simulate the bitter taste of hops. Pickles contained copper sulphate, and custard powders yielded traces of lead. Sugar was blended with plaster of Paris, as was flour. Milk had been watered down, then bulked up with chalk and sheep's brains. In the literary realm, for most of the 19th century the United States remained an outlaw in the world of international copyright. The nation's publishers merrily pirated books without permission, and without paying the authors or original publishers a dime. When Dickens published a scathing account of his visit, "American Notes for General Circulation," it was immediately pirated in the United States. 19th-century American producers churned out counterfeit products in remarkable quantities, slapping fake labels on locally made knockoffs of foreign ales, wines, gloves, and thread. As one expose at the time put it: "We have 'Paris hats' made in New York, 'London Gin' and 'London Porter' that never was in a ship's hold, 'Superfine French paper' made in Massachusetts."
    5
  5574. @nationalghost "said that the Chinese Communist regime will not be good for the Chinese, and its power will only make China more blocked." How exactly? China is currently thriving under authoritarian CCP leadership as I have demonstrated, and I even used KMT's authoritarian example to prove that Taiwan progressed under single-party KMT rule. I have shown that back in 1971, the United Nations voted to recognize PRC as China and kick out ROC from the UN security council, yet you failed to acknowledge that PRC won two-thirds majority vote in the UN polls. So what more needs to be said about CCP legitimacy over China? I have shown that during the Chinese Civil War, the communists were mostly poorly trained peasants and had fewer numbers than the KMT, who had wealth, manpower and US miiltary aid. Even after the Japanese surrendered in 1945, the KMT still outnumbered the communists by at least 3 times. Yet despite all these advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa? I have thoroughly argued my point and all you done is hold "double standards" with regards to KMT dictatorship and CCP dictatorship, and somehow argue CCP doesn't deserve China.
    5
  5575. @nationalghost You have failed to show how CCP regime is illegal. The KMT came to power by seizing power from Qing Dynasty, and the CCP did the same thing to KMT. How is one regime justified and the other not? And the UN even democratically voted to recognize PRC as China and kick ROC out in 1971, so your arguments about CCP's illegitimacy have been thoroughly dismantled. And democracy is slowly killing Taiwan, they lost their most politically experienced party, the KMT and got replaced by a new and inexperienced political party, the DPP, all because the Westerners said so. If this new DPP suddenly declare Independence, the mainland will most definitely move to stop it and reclaim Taiwan, and do the people of Taiwan trust the DPP to lead them? The DPP is not the battle-hardened KMT that fought the communists during Chinese Civil War.
    5
  5576.  cantonpillow  In 2016, China launched world's first quantum satellite, Micius, 墨子 into orbit and demonstrated that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere, smashing the previous record held on Earth. Video: China's Quantum Satellite youtube.com/watch?v=4QlcKuxDGrs Quantum entanglement (in a nutshell) is when two subatomic particles become an "entangled pair", able to influence their quantum states (won't go into detail here) seemingly regardless of the distance involved. One particle could be on the surface of the Earth, and the other on the surface of the Moon, and theoretically, they can still influence each other with no information (known to current science) passing in between them. The longest record for quantum entanglement on Earth is 143 km in at experiment in the Canary Islands. But China has allowed two stations (Delingha and Lijiang station) located 1200 km apart to communicate directly, through our quantum satellite, thus breaking the previous record and showcasing that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere.
    5
  5577. @sukachups China seeks win-win cooperation, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    5
  5578.  @pierremarel  "Also I am not sure that Vietnam and Philippines see the creation of artificial military islands in their maritime zone as a “win win” or a mutually beneficial situation." Vietnam occupies twenty-one islands on which it has built runways, piers, barracks, storage tanks, and gun emplacements. Malaysia and the Philippines have five and nine islands respectively, occupied by naval detachments, and they all have runways that are capable of launching military aircraft, so aren't those countries militarizing the South China Sea?
    5
  5579.  @mylet2658  If Taiwan is an independent country, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there some force preventing Taiwan from joining the UN?
    5
  5580.  @mylet2658  So you agree that Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Why is it Taiwan cannot formally declare independence without incurring serious consequences? And the U.S won't even risk their troops to defend Ukraine, why would they do so for Taiwan island?
    5
  5581.  Beast Mode  “It is better to be a warrior in a garden than a gardener in a war.” is a paraphrase of a Chinese proverb. It means that it's better to prepare for war during peacetime than to be unprepared during an actual war. It fits China's stance that China does not wish for war, but it doesn't mean China is not prepared for one.
    5
  5582.  @elanor2123  "神州 Shenzhou I think u just repeated what u said here" Yes, because the KMT enjoyed a numerical superiority over the Communists, even after the Japanese surrender in 1945. Yet despite their numerical superiority, better weapons and more wealth, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communist's right to rule China. Also, you made the claim that the condition of the PLA soldiers were relatively better, both physically and mentally, but do you have evidence? The PLA were mostly an ill-equipped, peasant army, while the KMT were mostly professional soldiers, with vast stores of weapons, fool, fuel and other U.S military aid at their disposal. Yet it was the communists that eventually won control over the mainland in the end.
    5
  5583.  @williamgoode9114  Like Cyrus Janssen said in the video, the American system is set up such that you can change the government, but not the policies. Whether it's Republican or Democrats, anti-China sentiment enjoys bipartisan support from Americans, so it's highly unlikely that changing the president will change America's overall stance towards China.
    5
  5584.  @GabrielEddy  The Philippines deliberately grounded a vessel (the Sierra Madre) onto the Second Thomas Shoal. In 1999, Philippine president Joseph Estrada promised that the vessel would be towed away. In 2014, the Chinese government asked the Philippines to remove the grounded ship. In 2017, China and the Philippines established a gentlemen's agreement that the status quo would be maintained for the South China Sea while both sides tried to strengthen their relations. Under the status quo agreement, no construction materials would be allowed to fortify the Sierra Madre. But the Philippines violated this agreement by sending supply ships with construction materials to reinforcing the rusting hull of the grounded vessel.
    5
  5585. ​@North Korea Is Best Korea China has imposed tariffs on Australian barley and wine exports yes, but what Chinese sanctions on Australia are you talking about? Which Australian product is not allowed to be sold in China?
    5
  5586.  @steviemuch  Why do you wish death upon our leaders? Even I don't wish death upon Donald Trump.
    5
  5587. ​ @sibtainraza8673  SpaceX Falcon 9 can lift payloads of up to 22,800 kilograms (50,300 lb) to low Earth orbit, 8,300 kg (18,300 lb) to geostationary transfer orbit (GTO), whereas China's Long March 5 can lift payloads of 25,000 kilograms (55,000 lb) to LEO[4] and 14,000 kilograms (31,000 lb) to GTO.
    5
  5588.  @sibtainraza8673  But what exactly is Falcon Heavy going to launch into space that is of heavy or super-heavy payload? Space stations? Sending astronauts into space? Landing on the Moon? Elon Musk does not plan to apply for a human-rating certification to carry NASA astronauts for Falcon Heavy so what is its purpose then?
    5
  5589. Agreed. Putin wanted assurance that NATO would not expand eastward (i.e that Ukraine will not be allowed to join NATO). Many NATO countries themselves are reluctant to admit Ukraine into NATO, but they refuse to put that down in words to reassure Putin.
    5
  5590. This reminds me of why Google left China because they lost majority market share to Baidu. While Google's market share climbed from 15% in mid-2006 to 31% in 2010, Baidu's shared increased its market share from 47% in mid-2006 to 64% in 2010, which is a significant lead. In the end, Google decided to withdraw from mainland China after losing majority market share to Baidu.
    5
  5591.  @gulamog5041  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here, why would Chinese people want to be ruled by America?
    5
  5592.  @deliverant9375  What social credit system are you talking about? Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    5
  5593.  @deliverant9375  Come to Xinjiang and you can witness Uighur culture being promoted through traditional clothing, Uighur cuisine, singing, dancing, playing traditional instruments, and so on.
    5
  5594.  @borisnegrarosa9113  If you want more proof, there's a statue of Zheng He at the Cheng Ho Gallery in Malacca. There's also a statue of Zheng He at the Sam Poo Kong Temple, in Semarang, Central Java.
    5
  5595. Thanks to the VISA-free travel policy, lots of Westerners have uploaded their own "First Impressions of China" videos onto YouTube, and it's like nothing like what their media portrayed what China would be like.
    5
  5596. Likewise, Singapore has also learned a lot from China. For example, Singapore's meritocracy is derived from the ancient Chinese meritocracy based on examinations and promoting people base on merit.
    5
  5597. After seeing American "diplomats" like Jake Sullivan and Anthony Blinken behave undiplomatically towards China, there's hardly any reason to think American MSM "journalists" are anything but journalistic.
    5
  5598. Citizen Suppression? America has the world's largest incarceration rate and US prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity, that the US government releases inmates back onto the streets in order to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons.
    5
  5599. China produced many successful software companies like Huawei, Lenovo, ZTE, Xiaomi, Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, JD, DJI, Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, and this list is not exhaustive. But where are the famous Indian software companies? Sources: List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies
    5
  5600.  @catmandu6776  You said: "biggest pollution producer in the world and the list goes on" Western countries have been polluting the Earth for 200-300 years back when the Industrial Revolution started in around 1700-1800 AD. China in comparison, only modernized some 50 years ago, during Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms in late 1970s. China has air pollution problems due to our reliance on fossil fuels, but that's why the government is investing in green energy. China even built the world's largest hydroelectric power station, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean and renewable energy. As a result, China actually ranks 1st in the world in hydroelectricity production. Top 10 countries by Hydropower Electricity Generation in 2018 1. China (1,229 TWh) 2. Brazil (414 TWh) 3. Canada (382 TWh) 4. United States (294 TWh) 5. Russia (184 TWh) 6. Norway (139 TWh) 7. India (130 TWh) 8. Japan (88 TWh) 9. Venezuela (70 TWh) 10. France (62 TWh) ... Source: YouTube Video: Top 20 Country by Hydropower Electricity Generation (1965-2019)
    5
  5601. It's possible that it was Belorussian forces that were employing Tochkha-U missiles during the training exercises, not Russia.
    5
  5602.  @Ass_of_Amalek  There's a Chinese saying: There are no heroes who fall from the sky, only mortals who step forward. (世上没有从天而降的英雄，只有挺身而出的凡人。)which means that "God won't save people, it's people who save people."
    5
  5603. The United States has no true allies, they only perceive other countries through stereotypes: -Saudi Arabia as their gas attendant. -India as their tech support. -China as their factory worker. -Mexico as their cheap laborers. -The EU as their steward. -Australia as their sheriff in Asia. ... And they act surprised when some of those countries start making independent decisions of their own, that goes against their assigned role.
    5
  5604.  @Andy-P  You can't refute the fact that espionage charges were brought up in China against the two Michaels (just search online) whereas nobody even knows what crime Meng Wanzhou allegedly committed. If it was truly "hostage diplomacy" like you claimed, then Meng would have been released 2-3 years ago, instead of being detained for nearly 3 years! Where's the logic behind your argument?
    5
  5605. Anti-China sentiment in the United States is encouraging many overseas Chinese people to return to the homeland.
    5
  5606.  @MarkYeung1  The right to self-defense is not the same as the right to armed struggle against an occupying power. The Israeli are occupiers of Palestine, much like how Imperial Japan occupied the Chinese province of Manchuria during WWII, are you saying that Japan has the right to self-defense with their forces in Manchuria?
    5
  5607.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Just because of the tremendous Taiwanese ECONOMIC growth in the 1970s and 1980s means the POLITICAL system is successful." I'm glad that you also agree that if a political system is able to deliver economic growth (such as Taiwan under the authoritarian single-party KMT) then the political system is indeed successful. You said: "China was the strongest country in the world in the late 17th and early 18th century." Not really, that was the period of China's decline. If your previous statement is correct, that means China's political system was weak during this period.
    5
  5608.  @voiceofreason6515  You said: "It's scary that so many people have not lived under a democratic system and thus don't understand the benefits." China's political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) transforming our country from a once, dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military expenditure. And it's all achieved under communist party leadership. If anything, China is living proof that not all countries have to adopt Western-style democracy to be successful.
    5
  5609. If you watch Chinese media like CGTN or New China TV, they talk about promoting better economic cooperation with the West, and how China's government and Western government can both coexist. But Western media like Fox News, CNN, all paint China as the "enemy" and talk about possible war scenario with China, or starting trade war with China.
    5
  5610. China is currently not at war with any country, since our last major war in 1979. But USA is involved in wars even in 21st century, such as Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, etc, and is cutting off those country's heads (Muammar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, etc) and installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now President Trump is targeting Syria, and the Assad Regime is next on the US list of governments to topple.
    5
  5611. India should have its own One-Child Policy, because today India is suffering from overpopulation. Child malnutrition and mortality rates are high in India, and literacy is only about 72%. What's the point of having more than one kid per family, if there's not enough food to feed the children, not enough schools to send the kids to, and not enough hospitals to provide adequate healthcare? Isn't it better to focus all your resources on raising a single kid healthily and educated?
    5
  5612. +InfinityGaming But in India, so many kids are born every year, and not all of them grow up and many die from malnutrition, poor sanitation and lack of healthcare. World Bank data indicates that India has one of the world’s highest demographics of children suffering from malnutrition – said to be double that of Sub-Saharan Africa with dire consequences. Child Malnutrition in India savethechildren.in/articles/malnutrition-in-india-statistics-state-wise Why let your kids in India get born and die without ever reaching their full potential? There aren't even enough schools in India to send those extra kids to, so why give birth to them in the first place? Why not focus your attention on raising a single child instead? Also, did you actually see the video and understood what it was talking about? It's saying that a population boom created the aging population as they travel up the pyramid, so what makes you think India won't be full of old people, given its high birth rate?
    5
  5613.  @leonwoolf8984  Australia fancies itself one of the "Big Boys" like USA, Canada, UK, EU, seeing itself as a powerful Western(ized) country. However, Australia is not powerful economically as USA, UK, EU, Canada, neither is Australia as powerful militarily as USA, they can't afford to go toe-to-toe with China on economics or military. Australia is located closer to Asia than Europe or America, meaning that they'll be at the frontlines if conflict breaks out in Asia. Yet Australian politicians don't seem aware of their predicament, they still follow the USA's anti-China stance.
    5
  5614. China has 5,000 of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt eventually succumbed to history. Throughout our long history, China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous empires, and yet China has survived the oftentimes violent passage of time to modern times relative intact, whereas even the Republic of Rome crumbled to history.
    5
  5615.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Originality in posting the same comment? I've not seen anyone else here apart from me posting the fact that Beijing became the first city in Olympic history to have the honor of hosting both the Summer and Winter Olympics, which other person has posted such a comment?
    5
  5616.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  I posted it once on this comment thread that's all. And I've seen no other commenters make such a post, so how'd I infringed on anybody's originality?
    5
  5617.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  1) Not everyone may know that Beijing is the first city to host both Olympic types. 2) My comment helps inform people who may not be aware of the above. ... And 3) As far as I know, nobody else made such a comment about Beijing, so upon who's originality am I infringing upon?
    5
  5618.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  "神州 Shenzhou and how does that enrich their lives?" Now people know that it's entirely possible for a single city to host both types of Olympics, and Beijing is the first to have the honor of doing so. As for complaining about the food, while it was true that athletes like Valeria Vasnetsova had initially complained about her food lacking nutrition , but once the complaints were heard, it was rectified and her food nutrition was improved. Russian biathlon team spokesperson Sergei Averyanov later posted a picture of a meal including salmon, cucumbers, sausages and yogurt – adding that a stationary bike would be delivered to her room.
    5
  5619.  @MarkYeung1  The People's Republic of China was founded in 1949, whereas Hong Kong had been a British colony since 1842. Britain has had at least 100 years before the PRC's founding to implement democracy in Hong Kong during that period, yet they didn't do so until the 1997 handover date drew near. And Hong Kong was eventually going to be returned back to China in 1997, why do the British have the right to decide what political system Hong Kong will have from then onwards, when it's going to be returned to China? Despite the absurdity of the situation, mainland China still came to a compromise and allowed a different political system to exist in Hong Kong, hence the One Country, Two System policy. No other country in the world would tolerate a part of their territory having a different political system from the rest of the country, except for China with 1 Country, 2 Systems. Imagine if North Korea and South Korea decide to reunify as a single country, Korea, while both sides were allowed to keep their respective governance. That's the gist of 1 Country, 2 Systems.
    5
  5620.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "We knew Britain would not rule Hong Kong forever and would return to China in some way. To smooth to transaction, Hong Kong should be given democracy and freedoms." Why? Hong Kong didn't have democracy and freedoms for 150 years as a British colony, why was there suddenly a need to implement it? Furthermore, Britain is returning a piece of someone else's territory why should they change the system before they return it? If you borrow someone else's book, they want it back, can you just strip away the book cover page and replace it with some other cover and then return it back, expecting the owner to keep the new book cover?
    5
  5621.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Why so darn low, because they see that mainland WILL NOT KEEP THEIR PROMISES AND THEIR WAY OF LIFE, unlike the British" What promise was the British supposed to keep after they returned Hong Kong back to mainland China in 1997? British didn't implement democracy in Hong Kong for 150 years prior, now they promise to do so after the 1997 handover?
    5
  5622.  @MarkYeung1  "Shenzhou. If you read the Basic Law carefully, China allows Chief Executive to be voted by Universal Suffrage." Where does it say that? Article 45 of Basic Law said: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." So if anything, Beijing (aka the Central People's Government) reserves the right to appoint Hong Kong's Chief Executive as per Article 45 of Hong Kong Basic Law. Additionally, Article 45 says "The method for selecting the Chief Executive shall be specified in the light of the actual situation in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and in accordance with the principle of gradual and orderly progress." So in other words, if the situation in Hong Kong was chaotic (as in the 2019 Hong Kong riots) then Beijing reserves the right to make changes to the method for selecting the Chief Executive. You said: "It is now the year 2024, how are things working out?" Did Beijing ever specify a deadline to meet in Hong Kong's Basic Law?
    5
  5623. ​ @MarkYeung1  "May I ask you, if you are Taiwanese, will you honestly be happy with autocratic rules" Taiwan had been under autocratic single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). From 1952 to 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and 6.9% till 1986. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% from 1965 to 1986. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    5
  5624.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "And the same goes for China when Mao let millions dye of starvation." Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of the Great Chinese Famine, which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Mao himself couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. There's also the fact that the U.S slapped embargoes on food and medicine entering China (especially from Australia) so even if Mao wanted to import food, he couldn't due to the U.S embargoes.
    5
  5625. +Darren Carter I have been to America (New York, San Fransico, Ames, Minneapolis) and sometimes have been told by rude Americans to "Go Back to China" and "Stop Stealing our Jobs" and other such things. My Chinese friends living there, say although on the surface its America is calm, below it has just as much racism below the surface and isn't that similar to what laowhy is going through in China? As for the different immigration policies, its up to each country whether they want to impose strict or lenient immigration policies. China has the world's largest population, and we don't really need more immigrants, so that's why applying for a citizenship in China is harder. But I am not talking about applying for citizenship alone, I'm talking about viewing yourself as one of the locals as compared to viewing yourself as a foreigner. Chinese Mandarin is the most spoken language in the world by the number of speakers. As for the language difficulty, it is relative and I can also say English is a difficult language to learn to isn't it? But as for Chinese courses, how rare are they exactly? Every part of the world has at least some Chinese people living there and there are bound to be tuition classes available to take. Another factor is immersion in culture also helps people pick up the language faster. For example, in America people speak English, Spanish, French, etc, and so on, so a Chinese person living in America may pick up other languages besides English. But in China, everything is in Chinese, so from a language viewpoint, it should be much easier to pick up Chinese when you are immersed in such a culture. The fact that laowhy and serpentza still speak such poor Mandarin, despite immersing themselves in China, hearing Mandarin all the time, taking on Chinese wives, and living in China for about 10-15 years (they arrive in China in early 2000s I think) clearly shows that they make little effort in adapting to Chinese culture and learning the language properly. Lastly, about your example of an Chinese living America and an Non-Chinese living in China. In your case, I would also agree that the Chinese living in America clearly doesn't consider herself an American. She clearly refuses to speak English, and assimilate into American culture properly. If you approach her and ask her personally, she will probably answer that she don't consider herself American, even if she's living in America. And your example is reflected in laowhy and serpentza living China, but not speaking the language or attempting to integrate into Chinese culture and language.
    5
  5626. Chinese media like CGTN and New China TV, talk about promoting better economic relations with the West, that trade wars are no good for both countries, or they talk about how China's government and Western government can both coexist peacefully. But Western media like CNN and Fox News always talk about possible war scenario between USA and China, and starting trade war with China. So exactly how do our countries expect to become allies this way?
    5
  5627.  @st.altair4936  It just shows that Cyrus is not actually being paid by any government, which is why he's seeking sponsors for his videos.
    5
  5628. Perhaps we should gather up all the athletes with asthmatic conditions, and make them compete in the Paralympics or something.
    5
  5629.  @JTMaster  Where did Ukraine launch their neptune missile from?
    5
  5630.  @山寨  China has inducted the world's first operational anti-ship ballistic missile, a "carrier killer" capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, known as the DF-21D. Video: China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile youtu.be/p-cEunmqXM8 The DF-21D is capable of targeting aircraft carrier strike groups out in the open ocean, from the safety of the land. The DF-21D is launched from land-based mobile launchers and flies high up into the stratosphere, using its advanced maneuverability to avoid interception by anti-missile defenses below, before falling at hypersonic speeds (above Mach 20) The warhead is even capable of terminal guidance, making last minute adjustments to its trajectory just seconds before impact.
    5
  5631. @Francis Our amphibious assault vehicles aren't "sitting ducks" while crossing waters, they can even open fire at land targets while still in the water. Video: 共军ZTD-05两栖突车 ZTD-05 Amphibious Assault Vehicle youtu.be/fhF5YALpaFA?t=55
    5
  5632.  @Youdontshushh  "神州 Shenzhou hi wumao" Did I ever said anything about the Chinese Communist Party here in this thread? Otherwise, why are you accusing me of being 50 cents?
    5
  5633.  @Andy-P  The current US Ambassador to China (i.e Nicholas Burns) speaks fluent French and is proficient in Arabic and Greek. But Burns doesn't speak Mandarin, making him somewhat ill-suited to his role. How hard can it be to find an American that's fluent in Mandarin to act as ambassador?
    5
  5634. China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    5
  5635.  Gaylord Manlove  The USA have been supporting colour revolutions and inciting political unrest in so-called "banana republic" countries. Now Americans are protesting election results, just like one.
    5
  5636.  Gaylord Manlove  Just how politically naive do you think we are? China's political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then should China abandon our political system and adopt Western liberal democracy? When our system clearly works for China?
    5
  5637. Peng Shuai is clearly safe and she has appeared on IOC video call expressing her desire for her personal privacy to be respected. But the WTA is behaving like the paparazzi and demanding that she appear in public to bare her private affairs for all the world to see.
    5
  5638.  @xXTUCXx1  "神州 Shenzhou then respect the wishes of the WTA." Why don't the WTA respect Peng Shuai's right to privacy? And you're calling Chinese government evil? 26 women accused Donald Trump of sexual abuse but not a single one of those 26 women has been seen over more than a year, then yet you're claiming China is evil for helping protect Peng Shuai's privacy?
    5
  5639. 战忽局同志辛苦了。
    5
  5640.  @Sam-yt6fs  What makes you think China isn't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    5
  5641.  @Womberto  Pay people to say nice things about China? I watched serpentza's video and if the email is true, that means Cyrus Janssen had previously published his video entitled: "Americans Don't Know The Truth About China." and it was CGTN that asked Cyrus for permission to publish HIS video on CGTN website, then how is it paying people to say nice things about China? Cyrus HAD clearly published his video earlier before he was approached by CGTN.
    5
  5642.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "So what you are saying is that Singapore and Taiwan are the same. China has never occupied Taiwan." No, Singapore was never part of China's history, whereas Taiwan was historically part of China. How are they the same?
    5
  5643. Learning Chinese characters is certainly not time wasted. Located in virtually every major city in the world are various "Chinatowns" where people can gather to appreciate Chinese culture and sample Chinese cuisine. Learning Chinese language opens up channels of communications to up to 20% of the world's population.
    5
  5644. Why don't India settle their border dispute with Nepal instead of starting another with China? Nepalese policemen open fired and killed 1 Indian near Bihar over India-Nepal border dispute.
    5
  5645.  Appu  Why Indians look down on China, yet China has long surpassed India in various fields? Why hasn't India surpassed China despite being a Western brand of democracy?
    5
  5646. USA did not defeat North Vietnamese, and neither did they defeat North Korea entirely. Even today in 21st century, USA has been involved in wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, etc for over 15 years, without an end in sight. The soldier's kids back home, could grow up into adults in this time period and the war is still not truly won in the Middle East.
    5
  5647.  @blitz12399  "I can’t find that article where they considered it." It's from Sky News, dating to 21 Feb 2023.
    5
  5648.  @blitz12399  "the US may have sold Ukraine mostly Soviet era weapons," US is a member of Nato, therefore it's a fact that Nato had been sending weapons to Ukraine. So you're claim that "that's a lie" has been proven wrong.
    5
  5649.  @blitz12399  "...aside from Zelenskyy requesting for nuclear weapons and the west denying his request." The fact that Zelenskyy had made such requests to the west, already shows that there was discussion going on. And that's what I wrote (i.e "Western leaders were discussing the supply of nuclear weapons to Ukraine...") so what I wrote is clearly not a lie like you claimed.
    5
  5650.  @yslee1401  Dr Peter Forster, a geneticist Cambridge University has identified 3 Covid-19 strains (A, B, C) Type-A is believed to have leaped from bats to humans (animal-to-human transmission) and Type-B is mutated from Type-A and found predominantly in China while Type-C is mutated from Type-B and found predominantly outside China, in places like Singapore. Video: No proof that Covid-19 originated in Wuhan: Peter Forster youtu.be/AQQf2yoymu0 The interesting thing is that the Europe and America suffer predominantly from Type-A virus (animal-to-human transmission) and Type-A is predominantly found outside East Asia, in Europeans and Americans.
    5
  5651. @Tenzin Dhondup Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    5
  5652.  Current Channel  Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, Taiwan where all part of China during Qing Dynasty China, so what's wrong with China reclaiming our ancestral lands?
    5
  5653.  @bartonlee3594  According to NATO intelligence, Russia is producing about 250,000 artillery munitions per month (or about 3 million a year) and is on track to produce nearly 3 times more artillery munitions than US and Europe. Yet you're claiming Russia is running out of ammunition?
    5
  5654.  @rufanuf1  "神州 Shenzhou We were not taught the intricacies of Chinese history at school." Then what makes you presume to judge China when you weren't even taught its history? China has 5,000 years of history, has witnessed the rise and fall of numerous other nations and empires, and survived to the modern times relatively intact. Throughout our long history, we've always been under the authoritarian rule of Emperors and the Imperial Court, and the current government under the CPC closely encapsulates this ancient form of governance that has served China for millennia. Why then should China abandon our successful form of govern and adopt Western-style democracy? Because Westerners say so? Yet earlier you claimed: "Well your "Chinese heritage" has little to do with the CCP"?
    5
  5655.  @rufanuf1  About "stealing ideas", it's not as though Chinese have never invented anything of our own. Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions which have revolutionized the world we live in. But do Chinese complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions?
    5
  5656.  @laserbubulu  China only holds around 10% of Sri Lanka's total debt, and most of it is held by the West, yet you're only singling out China?
    5
  5657. Agreed. The U.S used to dominate supercomputers, but China is home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight 神威·太湖之光 and Tianhe-2 天河-2 and in the 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source: China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion).
    5
  5658.  @MrHotMonkey  China claimed South China Sea Islands back in 1947 when Republic of China (Taiwan) published the 11 Dash Line (which the 9 Dash Line is based upon). Philippines did not object to China's claim, the Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence in 1946 that the Spratlys was NOT Philippine territory, both to not anger Chiang Kai-shek in China and because the Spratlys were not part of the Philippines per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America.
    5
  5659. I find it strange that India has world's 2nd largest population after China and many Indians speak English (more preferable for Hollywood) while many Chinese still struggle with English even till today. Yet today Hollywood is seemingly more interested in catering to Chinese movie market than to Indian movie market?
    5
  5660. +Standardowy Login "They can read 2200 year old documents." Some Chinese people can read books like The Analects of Confucius 论语 and Sun Zi's The Art of War 孙子兵法 written 2200 years ago directly. But can English people actually read Shakespeare's work written in Shakespearean English? Whether in "Times New Roman" or not? " 'as Italian, French, German etc or simply European, not Roman.' When Chinese effectively discriminate against Chinese from their other provinces, this difference in strength of common identity is not so strong." Chinese may discriminate against Chinese from other provinces, but the difference is not as potent, as say the English and the French sense of national identity. Name change may matter so much to Europeans, but not to Chinese. Why Chinese care about Europeans who used to call themselves emperors and then changing it? Within the Roman Empire, Christianity was banned and Christians were punished for many years. Feeding Christians to the lions was seen as entertainment in Ancient Rome. And like it or not, Latin is considered by many scholars and linguists to be a dead language, since it is no longer alive and 'evolving' or being spoken natively by anyone.
    5
  5661.  @hadenali3714  The Ottoman Empire is no longer around today, whereas China has survived the violent passage of history to the modern day relatively intact. Chinese territories still consists of Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, North China, South China, Hainan Islands, etc. Whereas Roman/Ottoman empire has fragmented into different independent countries like United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Turkey, Egypt, Algeria, etc.
    5
  5662. What makes you think Chinese people lack worldly knowledge? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, haven't you heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending money on your economies? Your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Lenovo, ZTE, Oppo, are expanding overseas, and Chinese investors are buying up real estate in your lands. So what makes you think Chinese people lack freedoms? Chinese people can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    5
  5663. Ancient Chinese scholars been keeping meticulous records of our history. We know the names of all 650+ rulers of China, what period they ruled China, what sort of government they had, how many wives and concubines they had, how many sons and daughters they had, which daughters were married off and which son succeeded him and what happened to the rest of his children, how the emperor died, whether it was by court intrigue, poison or by rebellion. We know the size of the imperial court, how many ministers it had, how many eunuchs, the size of the imperial army, the names of the top generals, the battles they fought, the number of victories and defeats, the casualties and death toll of each battle, the territories conquered and lost, which territories became tributary states, the names of the leaders of suzerain kingdoms, how much tribute they paid to China, how much tribute they received from China in return, and so on. There is literally no period in China, where information isn't being recorded at all by Chinese scribes. China has among the world's most complete history and other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, Vietnam make use of Chinese records for information about their own country's history. China has even influenced Western history, and Chinese practices such as the Imperial Examinations resulted in the concept of a merit system, which spread from China to British India during the 17th century, and then into continental Europe. Source: List of rulers of China en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rulers_of_China
    5
  5664. Skate Trooper Who are you calling dude here? A. There may be languages that derived from Latin, but it that doesn't mean Latin is not a dead language. Languages that evolve and change over the years, are often termed "living", whereas those with no new words added or no native speaker having it as 1st language, are often called "dead" languages like Latin and also Egyptian Hieroglyphs for example. B. You brought up Western clothing, and also said: "China today is nothing like China in the past" so why can't I point out that Chinese wear traditional clothing during Chinese New Year, even till today? Do Western people still wear togas like they did in the past? Chinese people wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while rest of the world mostly wore loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Even the pants that you claim were invented by Germanic tribes in Celtic tribes were actually from China. The oldest known trousers in the world are found at the Yanghai cemetery in Turpan, Xinjiang, western China, dated to the period between the 13th and the 10th centuries BC, and were made of wool and most likely made for horseback riding. C. Rome conquered countries and introduced Roman/Greek culture to those countries, but in China's case, it was the Mongolian and Manchu rulers who adopted Chinese culture instead. You claim Western Civilization is born when the Rome fell, so how does that imply that Roman culture is Western civilization then? Many Western historians agree that Rome did indeed fell, otherwise, is Rome empire alive today? Chinese "empire" survived to the modern day relatively intact (Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Northern China, Southern China, Hainan Island, NorthEast China, etc) but is Roman empire (France, Germany, Britain, Spain, Italy, Egypt, etc) still alive today? D. The earliest evidence of crossbows comes from ancient China in the form of crossbow triggers dating back to the 6th century BC. Remnants of Intricate bronze crossbow were found in many Chinese tombs (including First Emperor's Tomb) but the wooden and degradable parts of the crossbow had long since rotted away. You were the one mentioning how China was still using chariots, so why can't I talk about weapons? Knights equipped with chainmail armor, were still vulnerable to high powered crossbow bolts fired by poorly trained peasants. And what Western military doctrine are you referring to? The are various Chinese military manuals, like Sun Zi's "The Art of War" 孙子兵法 and its topics are still taught in many modern military academies and sometimes applied to business and romance as well. As for revolutionizing warfare, the most significant invention was probably Chinese invention of gunpowder. E. I agree that many other countries can trace their heritage for thousands of years, but none as well as China. After the Fall of Rome, many European countries were plunged into the "Dark Ages" where little of their former glory is known and not much information being recorded about rulers, governments, armies, cities, etc. China has kept records of every Chinese ruler, their form of government, how many concubines the emperor had, how many sons and daughters the royal family had, which sons and daughters were killed, which son succeeded the emperor and what happened to the other children, etc. There is literally not a period in China where no information being recorded. China did not truly have a "dark age" like in Europe.
    5
  5665.  @FullPerspective  "You should read George Orwell's "Animal Farm" and "1984"" Are you serious? "Animal Farm" and "1984" are works of fiction set in fictional worlds where the author is able to control all the variables to craft a story for the purpose of entertainment. Those are stories are not necessarily reflective of the real world, and it would be foolish idea to take those stories as reality. "He was a man hoping for peace and a higher standard, not a man why tried to lower the standard to justify evil." George Orwell is a novelist. A writer of fiction. He deliberately exaggerates scenarios in his novels, portraying certain ideologies in a negative light for entertainment purposes in order to attract readership. Within fiction you can have idealistic standards of peace, but in the real world is not fiction and such unrealistic standards do not exist in reality.
    5
  5666.  @sallyandersen8729  Peng Shuai has been avoiding the public eye and she wants her privacy to be respected. But Western media would have none of that and they are trying to expose her private life for all the world to see (kinda like the paparazzi)
    5
  5667.  @John77Doe  This is the reason why Peng Shuai wants her personal privacy, because people like you are behaving like paparazzi and exposing her private life details for all the world to see, instead of respecting her personal privacy. It's clear that you don't really care about Peng Shuai's privacy as long as you have an opportunity to attack the Communist Party of China, that's why Western MSM is so eager to dig up details of her affair.
    5
  5668.  @John77Doe  You literally degraded Peng Shuai in your post, it's apparent that you don't really care about her, as long as you can use her as an excuse to criticise China. Peng Shuai has expressed her desire for personal privacy because people like you are going to use her as a pawn against China.
    5
  5669. Agreed. Meanwhile, the U.S constitution has remained stagnant and pretty much unchanged for the past 100 or so years.
    5
  5670. China doesn't force countries to come on board the Belt and Road Initiative if they don't want to. Beijing has always welcome New Delhi to participate in OBOR for mutual progress and prosperity, but thus far, New Delhi has rejected and Beijing has respected its decision. But that does not mean other neighboring countries of India like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Maldives can't come onboard OBOR.
    5
  5671.  @MarkYeung1  Video: Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam apologises for handling of controversial extradition bill youtu.be/SEi-ro3a-jE Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam has publicly apologised for her government's handling of a controversial extradition bill which sparked massive protests. Mrs Lam said she accepts that her administration's shortcomings are to blame for the public unrest.
    5
  5672.  @henrytep8884  You said: "they’re always threatening Taiwan, they drew their own boundaries on the South China Sea." It was Republic of China 🇹🇼 (i.e Taiwan) who first drew the 11-Dash Line marking out China's boundaries in the South China Sea and published it back in 1947. The Kuomintang government later fled from the mainland to Taiwan island, and even till today, Taiwan still maintains the claim to the 11-Dash Line. Whereas People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 modified the boundary to the 9-Dash Line by removing two dashes. Yet you're pining the blame on mainland China when it was the KMT government (that fled to Taiwan) who first drew up China's boundaries in the SCS?
    5
  5673. The world adopted paper money when it was first invented in China. Eventually the world will do so with digital currency as well.
    5
  5674.  @Member_zero  It's the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (phobia of the West being overrun by Asians) mentality that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, such that the thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China surpassing the U.S someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    5
  5675. Video games can be addictive. Many countries have laws restricting minors (below 18 years of age) from engaging in addictive activities/substances like smoking, gambling, drinking alcohol, and so on. Chinese government is adding video games to that list that's all. Adults over 18 years of age are unaffected by the video game hours restriction.
    5
  5676. Apart from The New Atlas and Richard Medhurst, I also watch George Galloway's Mother Of All Talkshows, Glenn Greenwald, The Dive with Jackson Hinkle, The Duran and Gonzalo Lira for information regarding the Ukraine crisis.
    5
  5677. Thriftiness is a virtue. Many Americans have landed up in debt because they like to spend more than save. The credit card was invented because capitalists want workers who've spent their paycheck to continue buying stuff beyond their means.
    5
  5678. You think the Nationalist Kuomintang didn't do the same with the Qing Dynasty Chinese flag? The one featuring a dragon on a yellow background that had been the first national flag of China and is usually referred to as the "Yellow Dragon Flag". Qing dynasty was the last imperial dynasty in Chinese history and between 1862 and 1912, the dynasty represented itself with the dragon flag, before it was overthrown by the Nationalist Kuomintang, who later featured their own Republic of China flag.
    5
  5679.  @MeiinUK  The "One Country, Two Systems" Policy was formulated by the Communist Party of China. No other country has such a system that allows multiple political systems (i.e communism and democracy) to exist within their borders except for China. It would be like if North Korea and South Korea both agree to reunify as a single country, Korea, but allowing both sides to keep their separate governments. Today, Hong Kong clearly have their own government separate from the mainland and Hong Kong conducts elections to vote for their favourite leaders. HK Chief Executive Carrie Lam won the 2017 election garnering 777 votes out of the 1200-member Election Committee (which consists of Hong Kong groups) and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections, all it does is appoint the HK Chief Executive that's all. And remember the basis of One Country, Two Systems is that it should be One Country. China will not tolerate any attempt to separate our country and make it Two Countries, Two Systems.
    5
  5680.  @zetristan4525  🖐👍You have my support! May your post beat that other guy!
    5
  5681. So many foreign tourists come to China every year to sample our local cuisine and they lived through the experience to share the food with others. Otherwise, why people seem to love Chinese food then?
    5
  5682.  @zackk4969  If that's really the case, then why is China currently the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people? What's the name the renowned Chinese writer in Chinese characters?
    5
  5683.  @zackk4969  Lu Xun was an avant-garde Chinese writer who was celebrated for his fictional works and amongst his great works of is the “Diary of a Madman”.《狂人日记》. But why are you basing China's thousand years of history on a work of fiction?
    5
  5684. ​ @panchopuskas1 If you think the Scandinavian model is the best system out there, then honestly speaking, why haven't more countries tried to emulate it?
    5
  5685. ​ @7Dorie Mutual respect? Canada detained Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou, and also accused India of the assassination, not to mention sanctioning Russia as well. That's Canada single-handedly pissing off half the BRICS nations.
    5
  5686.  @garygraham8373  So the death toll estimates for the Great Leap Forward reached up to sixty million? If we take China's population at that time (1950s - 1960s) as 600 million, then 60 million dead means that around 10% of China's population perished. So you're saying that China lost up to 10% of our population during the Great Leap Forward (1958-1962)? Where did you get such an exaggerated death toll figures from? If anything, my previous graph indicates that China's population actually increased during the Great Leap Forward period. You said: "all population control measures are inherently nebulous" If you're referring to the One Child Policy, in the past China was still dirt-poor country, suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems at that time. Why allow families in China to raise multiple kids, only for them to starve to death, succumb to childhood diseases, and having not enough food, not enough hospitals, and not enough schools to send them all to? Why not make families focus all available resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood, and get him into a good school? According to World Bank, China's extreme poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% extreme poverty and 96.4% literacy. Look at India, the world's 2nd largest population country, and India is suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems that China once suffered from in the past. Because India did not have any population control measures unlike China.
    5
  5687. Would you rather there be cheerful music instead?
    5
  5688. ​ @Sean-giang  Because China has huge population to lift out of poverty. China may soon graduate from a middle-income country into a high-income country by the end of 2023
    5
  5689.  @nickl5658  21% efficiency is an improvement for photovoltaic, but still not as efficient as molten salt. Granted you're talking about solar panels installed at home and molten salt is too big for home use at the current technology level. Molten salt does requires a huge critical mass in order to store enough heat from the Sun in order to continue generating electricity at night.
    5
  5690.  @falenone  Since when is it illegal to access Youtube while in China? Nobody will come and arrest you for logging on to YT while in China.
    5
  5691.  @yslee1401  The Nazis were democratically voted into power by preying on German people's resentment towards the humiliating Treaty of Versailles and Hitler promised to make Germany great again. Just like Donald Trump was voted into power by preying on gullible Americans' resentment towards China and he promised to make America great again. So isn't Western democracy the system at fault here?
    5
  5692.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "India is an example of why democracy works for a country with a large population" Could you elaborate how has democracy worked for India? Indian government spent $8.6 billion on election, making it the world's most expensive election. By comparison, the US spent an estimated $6.5 billion in the 2016 Presidential Election, and yet what sort of leader did democracy in India yield?
    5
  5693.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Between 500000 and 2 million people died as a result of the partition" Yeah, and did you know who partitioned India? Answer: Britain. So those people died needlessly when British India could have remained as a single country without partition. Yet you still don't see the "colonial mentality" guiding your point of view?
    5
  5694.  @shreyaskumarrath721  "神州 Shenzhou Bangladesh independence movement wasn't entirely fuelled by India." Nevertheless, India did supported Bangladesh independence and caused Pakistan to lose control over their territory. This generated suspicion in Pakistan towards India and is the driving force in the rift between Pakistan and Indian brothers. And again, who is the cause of this conflict? Answer: The British when they partitioned India. Unless Indians can free themselves from this, the colonial mentality will continue to dominate your thoughts
    5
  5695.  @MarkYeung1  "Shenzhou. I never heard the remarks. But Chinese and Indians should care for Ukraine." Zelenskyy's advisor, Mikhail Podoliak, made disparaging remarks that China and India have “low intellectual potential” and “don’t analyse the consequences of the steps they take.” Why then should Chinese and Indians care for Ukraine?
    5
  5696. There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, it was only detected by Chinese government. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    5
  5697.  @Cosmo1093  I did not conflate nationality with race, the word Chinese in the English language happens to refer to many things like Chinese race, overseas Chinese, Chinese nationals (and even Chinese language) and so on.
    5
  5698. Wafer fabrication consumes millions of gallons of water every day. When drought struck Taiwan, the island's wafer fabrication industries were severely affected, yet the U.S is transferring TSMC chip technology to the arid state of Arizona of all places?
    5
  5699. If a political system like China's clearly works, then perhaps other nations would stand to gain from studying the system rather than dismissing it altogether.
    5
  5700.  @blafonovision4342  "神州 Shenzhou probably because American diplomats have never styled themselves as “Wolf Warrior” diplomats." Neither have Chinese diplomats. The term "Wolf Warrior" is based off a top grossing Chinese firm, and it has somehow been associated with Chinese diplomats.
    5
  5701. These Uighurs kids are Chinese citizens so why can't China teach Uighurs Mandarin, Chinese history and that their motherland is People's Republic of China? Aren't Hawaiian kids American citizens and being taught English, American history and that their motherland is United States of America?
    5
  5702.  @fukushimaisrevelation2817  How does China have a Han racial superiority authoritarian mindset? Ethnic minorities in China like Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchu, etc. aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Ethnic minorities in China also enjoy special privileges over Han, such as tax exemption, priority in healthcare, free education for 15 years (9 years for Han), government bursaries and higher education admission advantages. For example, if a Han candidate needs say 600 points to apply for a certain university course, then an ethnic minority candidate needs only say 400 points to qualify for the exact same course. So how is China being Han supremacist when there are numerous privileges offered to ethnic minorities compared to Han? Also you talked about American protestant missionary worldview values, but China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    5
  5703.  @fukushimaisrevelation2817  So up till now, you've only been hearing one side of the story? And you've outright admitted that you've never visited China (nor will you ever visit) then why do you already harbor such a negative opinion of a country that you've never been? Previously China was a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the PLA, funded by the world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership despite Western MSM constantly denouncing China's success all along. Have you asked yourself why do you harbor a negative opinion of a country that you've never even set foot and seen what life is like here for yourself? You're welcome to come here and talk to the ethnic minority populations and see how much life has improved for them. For example, the population of Uighurs in China has since tripled in size from 3 million (1953) to 11 million (2020) Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2020 according to ethnic group censuses 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 ... How do you know that America is a war mongering nation but for good and not evil in general? Take Iraq for example, and former U.S President Bush accused Iraq of harboring Weapons of Mass Destruction, but after the Iraq War, no WMDs were ever found in Iraq. But the Iraq War resulted in the deaths of some 200,000 Iraqi civilians, according to Iraq Body Count then how is the USA a force for good when they kill people in other countries? Whereas China is not only improving our country, but China is also trading with other developing countries in Africa and South America, helping improve the quality of living in other countries. As for your last point about 5 billions copies of the Bible in print, you know which country is printing those Bibles? Answer: China. The world's largest Bible printer is China's Amity Printing Co, producing an average of 70 Bibles per minute, and they've just celebrated printing its 200 millionth Bible in 2019. So the question is why do you harbor such a negative view about our country, when China has found success through following our own path?
    5
  5704. @Jedi Of Math 369 Isn't the Soviet launching the world's first satellite a real achievement? Isn't the Soviet Union conducting human spaceflight a real achievement as well? It's like you're just deliberately dismissing Soviet achievements when they were pioneers in many space fields. Laika is the dog who became the first living creature sent into space, aboard Sputnik 2, November 1957. Valentina Tereshkova was the Soviet cosmonaut, who became the first woman to travel into space. Aren't these real achievements too? If you want to talk about prison populations then it's actually America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons.
    5
  5705. 老实说翻墙之后就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    5
  5706. +Dean Cutler China is the only country in the world to have a "One Country, Two Systems" policy, allowing Macau and Hong Kong to keep their own political systems, while the rest of the mainland to keep ours. No other country in the world is "open-minded" enough to tolerate more than one political system within their borders. Its as though North Korea and South Korea agreed to unify as Korea, but allow both to keep their own political systems. China has extended this "One Country, Two Systems" policy to Taiwan to allow them to keep their government while remaining part of China, but Taiwan has rejected this proposal, and yet to come up with a counterproposal of their own.
    5
  5707. +Eric, The Fanboy Slayer Hong Kong's economy is in a major slump today, and HK relies on the mainland's economy. For example, look at how prosperous Shanghai is in the mainland, and under CCP leadership, Shanghai has long surpassed Hong Kong as a port city and world financial hub. Why is Shanghai in the mainland doing so well, and why Hong Kong isn't? Here's a short 3 min clip of aerial footage of beautiful Shanghai and look at how modern it's become. Video: youtube.com/watch?v=1cC-j4_NtvE
    5
  5708. +Eric, The Fanboy Slayer World famous Shanghai is now a global financial center, a transport hub and the world's busiest container port, and so much more. Shanghai the largest city in China by population, and the second most populous city proper in the world. The port city has a long rich history, with British colonial buildings next to futuristic skyscrapers, curving highways, majestic suspension bridges, ancient Buddhist temples. At night, the city comes alive with dazzling lightshows, colorful neon light shows, brightly lit boats, and richly decorated temples. This short 4 min video will help illustrate Shanghai's modernity. Video: Shanghai Time Lapse youtube.com/watch?v=kI3Oc-sxSoA
    5
  5709.  @ProfessorGlasgow  Westerners been oppressing Chinese in their own ways. The biggest lynching in America occurred in a Chinatown in Los Angelos Street, and Westerners once had Chinese Exclusion Act forbidding Chinese from obtaining US citizenship. Video: The Largest Lynching In US History youtube.com/watch?v=UpZZf7K12pU Even in Indonesia, world's largest Muslim population country, the Indonesian government persecuted Chinese in Indonesia by banning expressions of Chinese culture through language, religion, and traditional festivals and the ethnic Chinese were pressured to adopt Indonesian-sounding names. During racial riots that swept across Indonesia there was mass rape of Chinese women and rioters broke into Chinese stores to loot them and burn them to the ground.
    5
  5710.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  At 2:15 you can see that the email from CGTN requesting permission to publish Cyrus' video was dated to March 15, so the discussions were made before CGTN posted his videos on their website in March 24.
    5
  5711. It's a combination of the "Red Scare" (fear of communism) and the "Yellow Peril" (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the USA today.
    5
  5712. USA accuse China of potentially abusing the Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now scrapped). Yet the USA abuse their own extradition bill with Canada through the Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou case. The utter irony!
    5
  5713. Traveling from the West to China is like traveling into the future, with virtually everyone using mobile payment apps instead of cash in the West.
    5
  5714. Peng Shuai has been avoiding the public eye and she wants her privacy to be respected. But Western media would have none of that and they are trying to expose her private life for all the world to see (kinda like the paparazzi)
    5
  5715.  @robezy0  But the very nature of asymptomatic infection is that you don't know you have the virus, you feel well and decide to go out unknowingly (worst if you don't wear a mask).
    5
  5716.  @MarkYeung1  The Cold War was not a unipolar world, it was a bipolar world. You keep on talking about so-called "unipolar influence" of the Soviet Union, but in truth there was no such thing. Countries during the Cold War had a choice between USA or USSR (or in Finland's case, neutrality). The world only became unipolar after the USSR dissolved in 1990, and USA dominated everything. Finland joining NATO is clearly reinforcing the unipolar world, when it was once neutral in the past. What about Ukraine? Ukraine could have been neutral too, acting as a buffer zone between NATO and Russia, siding with neither side. But instead it chose NATO and Russia had no choice but to respond to stop NATO expansion eastwards right up to its doorstep.
    5
  5717.  @MarkYeung1  Collective security system? In 1999, NATO bombed Yugoslavia, even though Yugoslavia did not bomb any NATO member and Article 5 wasn't activated. The bombing of Yugoslavia killed between over 500 civilians (including Chinese in the Belgrade Embassy) and also destroyed or damaged bridges, industrial plants, hospitals, schools, cultural monuments, and private businesses. Not only Yugoslavia, but NATO even had a 2011 military intervention in Libya, even though Libya did not bomb any NATO member. How does this make NATO a defensive alliance? They can bomb whoever they want to, regardless of Article 5, then doesn't this make the organization a threat towards Russia, of whom NATO has been expanding eastwards towards?
    5
  5718.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "In Western countries you are not kidnaped, tortured, murdered for disagreeing." Tell that to Assange.
    5
  5719. Vietnam is also building islands and military bases in South China Sea as well, but you don't hear USA complaining about them isn't it? Vietnam Building Islands in South China Sea Source: businessinsider(dot)com/vietnam-building-islands-in-south-china-sea-2016-5/?r=US&IR=T China has 12 features whereas Vietnam occupies 21 islands on which it has built runways, piers, barracks, storage tanks, and gun emplacements. So isn't Vietnam militarising the South China Sea as well?
    5
  5720. Before WW2, Hitler preyed on German's people's resentment of the Treaty of Versailles by promising to make Germany great again and being voted into power. In the same way, Trump seduced American voters with false promises of making America great again.
    5
  5721.  @SivaSiva-oc3jf  No need to send all the African police who speak all the African language. Most of the Africans in Guangdong are from West Africa like Nigeria and Mali, so only need officers from those countries in Guangdong.
    5
  5722.  @RoyalAve321  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    5
  5723.  @peanutbar8882  That's Chinese President Xi Jinping, not Xi PingPing!
    5
  5724. Many Chinese hold optimistic attitudes and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Americans are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of their future.
    5
  5725. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have long since faded to history. Ancient Chinese had military inventions like the crossbow (and repeating crossbow) and besides gunpowder, Chinese also invented handcannons, handgrenades, fragmentation bombs, landmines, naval mines, exploding cannonballs, rocket launchers, multi-launch rocket systems and of course, fireworks.
    5
  5726. China's digital Renminbi is backed by gold. Meanwhile, the U.S is printing dollars backed by nothing.
    5
  5727. Back then China suffered from brain drain when China was poor, as people migrated out of China to developed countries in the West. However, now China is experiencing a reverse brain drain where people from developed countries are migrating to a developing country like China for more opportunities.
    5
  5728. 总而言之，我们不需要接受老外对中国的夸奖。而欧美国家绝大多数民众都对中国充满D意，我们做好自己的就行了，像主持人那些少数对中国友好的欧美人士都属于极少数。
    5
  5729. Look at Xinjiang and its much more prosperous than its neighbors like Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, etc. And its all thanks to Chinese workers developing the area, so why should Xinjiang have "solidarity" then?
    5
  5730.  Rudolf Adler te envita  Who said anything about a master race? All races have their weaknesses and they certainly aren't equal.
    5
  5731. A country does not become powerful overnight. A ballooning trade deficit takes time to grow to its current size today. Americans can't realistically blame Trump for America's problems today, when it has already been ongoing for years and Trump merely inherits problems from the past. A country's decline is gradual, not sudden, and it is unrealistic to assume a change in leadership can somehow fix everything. China's rejuvenation today is facilitated by leaders with foresight and long term planning for up to 30 years beyond and to address issues before they grow out of hand, different from American leaders, who plan short-term, only for the duration of their term (4-8 years) and then leave the burgeoning problems for the next leader.
    5
  5732. Diplomacy is becoming a lost art in the U.S, just look at the likes of Jake Sullivan, Anthony Blinken, John Kirby and so on.
    5
  5733.  @redfieldchris1217  Why are you deliberately calling it by it's improper name? It's proper name is Covid-19 as designated by WHO, not "CCP virus".
    5
  5734. China already has Asia's first fully automated port in Qingdao, that is controlled by artificial intelligence and is capable of working on loading and unloading ships 24/7 even into the night.
    5
  5735. +Robert Hardy Japan surrendered in 1945, only after Soviet Invasion of Manchuria, so what's KMT even got to do with defeating the Japanese? Furthermore, after Japanese surrender in 1945, the communists under Mao Zedong had only had a mere strength of 1,200,000 (July 1945) whereas the KMT had a strength of 4,300,000 (June 1946) so the KMT forces still outnumber the communists by at least 3 times! Yet the KMT still lost the mainland to the poorly trained, poorly equipped and heavily outnumbered communists, and had to flee to Formosa? This only demonstrates the sheer incompetence on KMT's right to rule China.
    5
  5736.  @foobman  The population of Uighurs in West China have actually grown by 16% since 2010.
    5
  5737.  @abreathoffreshair1  "It's a country in every sense that matters. It has a government, passports, currency and a legal system." China is a special that various regions of China are allowed varying degrees of autonomy, and yet still be considered part of China. For example, Hong Kong has their own government, passport, currency and legal system, and yet Hong Kong is considered part of China after the 1997 handover. Same thing applies for Taiwan, even their own constitution states that Taiwan is part of China.
    5
  5738.  @abreathoffreshair1  So you acknowledge Japan's high conviction rate, but Taiwan also has a conviction rate of more than 90 percent, according to statistics released by the Ministry of Justice, then what's the point of your comparison at all? On a side note, isn't having a low conviction rate worrying, since it implies that your police are arresting innocent people? A high conviction rate implies that the police are catching the guilty ones, not the innocent ones.
    5
  5739. But the Earth's fossil fuel reserves are limited and will eventually run out one day in the future, which is why electric cars are the way to go. Also, battery technology is gradually improving over the years.
    5
  5740. Zelenskyy's term as President of Ukraine has also expired in May. Now he's just an ordinary Ukrainian citizen, visiting other countries to beg for money.
    5
  5741.  @propertysolutions4773  Compound interest is the interest on a loan calculated based on both the initial principal and the accumulated interest from previous periods. Given that Sri Lanka's debt to China is due to mature in 18 years, compared to 33 years for Sri Lanka's debt to Japan, Japan stands to gain more over a longer period.
    5
  5742. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi "围棋"), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    5
  5743. The real world is the English language? Well, Chinese Mandarin has the most number of speakers in the world, so how is China aging here? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have long since faded to history. So why isn't China a protagonist of history?
    5
  5744. USA is often reluctant to switch to renewable energy, because many corporate giants in US government dominate the fossil fuel trade and want to keep their power. For example, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is ex-CEO of Exxon-Mobil, so it would be in his interest to keep the fossil fuel industry in US alive and to control the world's oil. China also has hunger for oil like USA, but because USA dominates the oil industry, China has no choice but to find alternatives, like renewable energy and to work to make them cheaper and competitive against fossil fuels. USA also has well established infrastructure like gas stations and petrol vehicles, and reluctant to switch to electric charging stations and electric cars, whereas China still development, and can easily incorporate more charging stations and electric vehicles into our development.
    5
  5745. Zoe I mean, look at what feminism done to Western women. They have choices of careers, but often neglect their own family. They are encouraged to dominate their men, and to wear the pants in the family and so on. Don't you see that this is putting off Western men from marrying them, and to seek more traditionally feminine partners instead?
    5
  5746.  @Curry.59  China is literally selling natural gas to the EU countries at a profit, while at the same time, China is buying cheap Russian gas at a discount.
    5
  5747.  @sakethravuri3023  Slave labour? India is home to world's largest number of people living in modern slavery at a whopping 18 million people, about 5 times more than any other country on the planet. Source: India has 18 million modern slaves—at least five times more than any other country in the world qz.com/india/695565/india-has-18-million-modern-slaves-at-least-five-times-more-than-any-other-country-in-the-world/
    5
  5748.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou How many times Canada/USA/Australia/UK use their National Security Laws to close newspapers?" The United Kingdom revoked the British broadcasting license for CGTN on 4th Feb 2021. The United States revoked China Telcom's license on national security concerns on 26th Oct 2021. So what makes you think this doesn't happen in other countries?
    5
  5749.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou please don't get upset. Nazi Germany, Stalinist Russia, Imperial China had used their national security laws to close newspapers and arrested/killed the people the authorities didn't like." So did Imperial Japan, South Korea under their dictator Park Chung hee. Even Chiang kai-shek of the Nationalist Kuomintang imposed martial law in Taiwan for 38 years which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Even today, the United States is using their National Security Law to arrest the Jan 6th Capitol Hill rioters for their storming the U.S Capitol, even though many of those rioters have political grievance with Biden's election.
    5
  5750.  @MarkYeung1  Even after the Hong Kong Extradition Bill was scrapped by Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam, the Hong Kong rioters still continued with their unrest and rioting, then how long do they expect to riot? It's actually thanks to the Hong Kong National Security Law that order has been restored to Hong Kong after a year of protest and riots. And because the Hong Kong Extradition Bill has been scrapped, now a Hong Kong murderer roams free and the Hong Kong authorities are powerless to extradite this murderer to Taiwan to face his crimes and for justice to be served for the victim's family members.
    5
  5751.  @golazo  Traces of Covid-19 have been found in Barcelona sewers in Spain, since March 2019, before the outbreak in Wuhan even began. Source: Reuters: Coronavirus traces found in March 2019 sewage sample, Spanish study shows reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-spain-science-idUSKBN23X2HQ Spanish virologists have found traces of the novel coronavirus in a sample of Barcelona waste water collected in March 2019, nine months before the COVID-19 disease was identified in China, the University of Barcelona said
    5
  5752.  @MarkYeung1  Where did you get this figure of 2 million Hong Kong people marching on the street? Hong Kong Police Force deployed on the grounds estimated 338,000 protestors and I trust the figures from the HKPF. Also, you claim it was peaceful later protests were violent, breaking shop windows and destroying public property.
    5
  5753.  @MarkYeung1  Why would the Hong Kong Police Force under report the numbers? The HK police need to deploy road barriers and sufficient personnel to control the traffic, so gauging an accurate number of protestors is essential for the protest to remain peaceful. Your family was in Hong Kong, but I take it you weren't physically there yourself? Then what makes you think your family knows better than the HK Police the number of protestors? You said the 2 million number was reported by the Hong Kong Free Press, but where did they get the information from? Turns out the number was taken from the organizers of the event, then what makes you think the organizers didn't exaggerate the number of protestors? "Please did not blindly follow the Chinese State run media" When did I ever quoted the Chinese Media? All I asked was where did you get your figure of 2 million? Because the Hong Kong police reported only 330,000 protestors, so how is this Chinese State run media?
    5
  5754. ​ @MarkYeung1  "the government should have listened to the PEACEFUL DEMONSTRATIONS and scrapped the extradition bill long ago" They did. The extradition bill was scrapped by 23 October 2019, yet the Hong Kong riots continued even after the bill was scrapped. It wasn't until the Hong Kong National Security Law was imposed and peace was returned to Hong Kong. Who knows how long the Hong Kong riots would have continued if not for the HK National Security Law?
    5
  5755. Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors (just ask the expats). However, many Westerners are increasingly viewing Chinese in their lands with suspicion.
    5
  5756.  @MikeJones69696  "神州 Shenzhou China shouldn't funded the Russians and Ukraine's with weapons😂 China wants that war" If China wants that war, then why did China propose a 12-point peace process for Ukraine?
    5
  5757.  @bartonlee3594  "which centers (always) around building a brand of people who agree with each other and never question those orthodoxies." Cyrus Janssen's videos promote the peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" between the U.S and China. Cyrus is of the view that if both US and China cooperate, then the world benefits as a whole, but if confrontation exists between US and China, then the world suffers. Is there something wrong with people agreeing this message?
    5
  5758. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners (not all) are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    5
  5759. Like you said, India is still in the process of buying S-400, whereas China already has tested hypersonic missiles numerous times. I'm sure Chinese government can cut Russia a deal not to sell S-400 to India, in exchange for economic benefits to Russia
    5
  5760. Just barely... And he spoke Mandarin, not Chinese.
    5
  5761.  @marily6654  Excuse me, but why don't you explain yourself, instead of just claiming I don't know anything about world politics?
    5
  5762.  @markemailonly3114  Firstly, Uighurs that are born in Xinjiang are considered Chinese citizens. They will receive their Resident ID card acknowledging that they are Chinese citizens, and they receive a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (the national language of China), Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China. Just like the Hawaiins born in Hawaii are American Citizens, they receive an American ID card, learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America. So since Uighurs are Chinese citizens by birth, then what's wrong with treating them like Chinese? Aren't Hawaiins also treated as Americans? Also, do you have evidence that Southern Chinese dialects and the Uighur languages are being replaced with Mandarin? In Xinjiang, the street signs, road signs, even the restaurant menus have the Uighur written script on them and the Uighurs in Xinjiang do speak their language.
    5
  5763. ​ @markemailonly3114  You said: "Uyhgur's own unique culture and history are not appreciated enough and priority for their preservation be given by the state." Alright, do you have evidence to support this claim of yours? I check the Chinese Renminbi note, and our physical currency actually contain Uighur langauge (as well as Tibetan, Mongolian and Zhuang language) written on our currency itself, how's that for "not appreciating" Uighur culture? Since you brought up the Native Americans, does the American Dollar bill contain any Native American writing in them? I mean, I watch Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV, and they proudly showcase Uighur culture, cuisine (like naan flatbread & lamb kebabs) festivals, traditional clothing, playing traditional instruments, song and dance, then how is China not being appreciative of Uighur culture and its preservation? You said: "Uyghurs are different from the Han and should not be treated exactly alike." Uighurs (and other ethnic minorities like Tibetans, Mongols, Manchu, etc) are actually treated differently from Han. In China, ethnic minorities enjoy special privileges like tax exemption, priority in healthcare, free education for 15 years (9 years for Han), government bursaries and education admission advantages. For example, if a Han candidate and a Uighur candidate both want to apply for a certain university course, then if the Han needs say 600 points to qualify for this course, then the Uighur candidate needs only say 400 points (easier to apply) for the exact same course.
    5
  5764.  @peterlai9018  Agreed. All rare-earth ores contain less than 10% rare earth and must be upgraded to about 60% in order to be processed further.
    5
  5765.  @echelon2k8  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    5
  5766. Trump's tariffs won't last forever. Even President Trump will eventually have to step down once his term is over, and the next POTUS might just start reversing Trump's policies and lift the US-China trade war, thus restoring US-China trade relations to their previous pre-tradewar levels. President Xi on the other hand, abolished the term limits, so he'll still be guiding China years after Trump's tariffs are gone.
    5
  5767.  @HannarrMontannarr  said "If you're going to compare the PRC to any country it should be the Republic of China, which is superior to the PRC in possibly every metric" China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the manufacturing hub of the world and protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd largest military budget, and China today has strong global presence as well as being influential player of global politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is only ranked 22nd in the world, its manufacturing jobs have all been outsourced to the mainland (Made in Taiwan used to be commonplace, not its replaced by Made in China), its army is unable to retake the mainland as it once proclaimed to do. And worst of all, Taiwan's global presence today is minimal and hardly felt by the rest of the world.
    5
  5768.  @HannarrMontannarr  How exactly does the CCP stifles economic growth and entrepreneurship? China has experienced massive economic growth under the CCP and there are many startup companies in China that have current valuation of US$1 billion (also known as "unicorns"). China leads the world in unicorns and there are 131 of such startups in China as compared to US (85), India (20), UK (7), and so on. Source: List of unicorn startup companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unicorn_startup_companies
    5
  5769.  @HannarrMontannarr  "The centralisation of power without oversight does and has lead to enormous levels of corruption in china." India is democracy, without centralized government, but India actually has ranks higher on corruption levels than even China. Its because BJP and CPC rank among the world's largest political parties and that's why there are high levels of corruption within our political parties. Corruption is universal phenomena but at least under President Xi Jinping there are ongoing anti-corruption crackdowns dealing with the mountain of corruption within the party. China's economy is still growing and is even expected to surpass the US's by 2050, so what's wrong with CCP leading at the helm? And how do you know for sure that China's economy "could and should have grown faster and earlier" like Japan or South Korea? How exactly has the Communist Party been a disaster for China? The CCP is not perfect (then again, which government body is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates plummeted. Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India http://www.china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India in the past, yet China managed to lift 700 million people out of poverty in just 40 years! Just for comparison, the entire African population is about 1.2 billion so China lifted a number equal to HALF of Africa's entire population out of poverty in decades, as compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. And it was all achieved under CCP leadership, so why do you claim the CCP is disaster for China?
    5
  5770. I believe it's called "terminal guidance" that refers to any guidance system that is primarily or solely active during the "terminal phase", just before the weapon impacts its target.
    5
  5771. +Yumeha Minakami When did I ever said the bow itself was Chinese invention? The earliest bronze crossbow triggers were found in China, during an Age where much of the world was forging short bronze swords, so what's wrong with claiming crossbow is Chinese inventions? Besides the crossbow, Chinese also invented a repeating crossbow that is semi-automatic and can fire bolts repeatedly. A large siege version of it was also built on ships. China had siege engines like the triple-bow arcuballista and the Lian Nu, which could fire multiple bolts at one time. Chinese cavalry also made use of crossbows on horseback. Chinese also had armor of our own, (seen on unearthed terracotta soldiers) which influenced the development of Japanese samurai armor later. Mail armor isn't the best armor everywhere in the world, because while it was effective against bladed weapons, it was vulnerable to high powered arrows and crossbow bolts, which was why it wasn't widely used in China. Ancient Chinese people were the first people to discover pig iron, cast iron, and wrought iron, inventing the blast furnace and cupola furnace, and the bellows necessary to achieve the temperatures needed to melt iron ore, using coke as fuel. Chinese metallurgists also produced steel of our own, by repeated forging, folding, and stacking of wrought iron from pig iron, in a process known as Puddling. The first stirrups (that improved mounted combat) appeared during Han dynasty around this time. In seafaring, Chinese sailors invented the compass, the nautical steering rudder, bulkheads (to keep floods compartmentalization in a ship) as well as special Chinese-style sails, which resemble "fish-fins". Lastly, China invented paper and paper inventions like sky lanterns (the first hot air balloons) and kites used for battlefield signalling. 3D maps detailing terrain (like the one at 2:46 of the video) were invented in China to factor in the terrain during large confrontation, and in such battles the terrain was important part of the battlefield.
    5
  5772. In a poll of nearly 7500 readers by the United Daily News website, 61 percent said the trip was “not welcome” as it “may destabilise the Taiwan Strait”. Only 38 percent welcomed the visit and said it had “more advantages than disadvantages”.
    5
  5773.  @Naikomi95  "Shenzhou. When I was in China I didn't find all those educated people" Which part of our vast country of China did you visit?
    5
  5774.  @BrokeCanadian  100 billionaires? The size of the Nation People's Congress (NPC) is 2,980 members so billionaires make up only 3% of China's parliament.
    5
  5775.  @gravydave1771  China province belong to Taiwan? Then why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (taxed from peasants) superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Wiping out the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT, yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communists peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists' right to rule China.
    5
  5776.  FREEHONGKONG-yn5ij  Hong Kong already ranks among the world's freest in various freedom indices. The Economic Freedom of the World Index gives Hong Kong a top score of 8.91, while Index of Freedom in the World gives Hong Kong SAR a score of 8.81.
    5
  5777. I've also often seen the symbol of a yellow trident 🔱in a blue 🟦background and it turns out that it's the emblem of the same OUN, the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists.
    5
  5778. Indeed. Scientists are approaching the physical limit to just how small they can make silicon chips. It's believed that silicon transistors cannot be made any smaller than 2 nanometers, because quantum effects such as tunneling start to kick in and affect the transistors. Carbon-based chips have the potential to surpass the size limitations of silicon chips, which is why China is investing in this technology.
    5
  5779. As of 2015, China is the 4th most visited country in the world, after France, United States, and Spain, with 56.9 million international tourists per year, so why you claim nobody likes China?
    5
  5780. ​ @stunningandbrave2520  Surely you can at least name one company that has been taken over by the state and then become unsuccessful?
    5
  5781.  @Andy-P  "Shenzhou. Taiwanese culture has freedom of expression a feature of human rights. China doesn't have that" Taiwan had been ruled by authoritarian single-party Kuomintang for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, and Chiang kai-shek is a dictator who jailed/executed dissidents and political rivals, imposing martial law in Taiwan for 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. You said: "Taiwan has some Japanese & western culture. China doesn't have that." You're saying Taiwan embraces Japanese food, Japanese anime and so on? Mainland China also has places where you can order Japanese food and watch Japanese anime, so how is this different?
    5
  5782.  @Andy-P  Taiwan has a population of 23 million, whereas mainland China has the world's largest population at 1.4 billion. So on the per capita basis, if you divide China's GDP by our enormous population, then of course you'll get a GDP per capita for mainland China that's lower than that of Taiwan. But if you compare with India (i.e world's largest democratic country), then China's GDP per capita is 6x greater than that of India's.
    5
  5783.  @Andy-P  Of course China has far more famous companies. China dominates the Top 500 companies ranking in Fortune magazine. 1. China (143) 2. United States (136) 3. Japan (41) 4. Germany (30) 5. France (24) ... But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to mainland China? Yet you're saying Taiwan can match mainland China? You said: "Doesn't mean Taiwan would be better ran by autocratic Xi" Again like I said earlier, it doesn't have to be that way! The One Country, Two Systems policy allows both Taiwan to keep their government and their elections, while being considered as having fully reunified with China. Also, as I've explained earlier, Taiwan's economy flourished under the authoritarian single-party leadership of the KMT, back when they were in power. What makes you think that Taiwan won't be better ran by an autocratic regime, given Taiwan's history?
    5
  5784.  @walterwayne3081  Earlier, Nick Iseb said "no it wasn't but it's not of my concern." You, Walter Wayne said: "if it is none of your concern then why mention it" Nick Iseb said "because it is .." (Hilarious, isn't it?)
    5
  5785. China actually invited Mike Pompeo to visit Xinjiang and see for himself that there are no human rights violations in Xinjiang. But Pompeo declined China's invitation. China Invites Pompeo to Visit Xinjiang, Says There Are No Rights Abuses (newsweek.com/china-invites-mike-pompeo-visit-xinjiang-no-rights-abuses-1518294 )
    5
  5786.  @intothewrx  Bruce Lee isn't around anymore, but have you tried asking Jackie Chan whether he considers himself Chinese or not?
    5
  5787.  @nathanblaylock8186  If such a system you've described has shown to beneficial to China, then can't China continue on with this system? Not all countries have to adopt "Western-style democracy" to be successful, and China is living proof of this. I mean, have you seen the current state of Western countries with their choice of system?
    5
  5788. Good medicine tastes bitter.
    5
  5789.  @pilaf43  Taiwan is an inseparable part of China. Even Taiwan's own constitution acknowledges that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution nor any formal declaration of independence, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. You claim Taiwan is an independent country, then why is it Taiwan cannot formally declare independence without incurring serious consequences?
    5
  5790.  Numinous Thought  Look at the difference in Covid-19 response. China choose to sacrifice businesses in order to save lives. Whereas the USA choose to sacrifice lives in order to save businesses, that shows how much more capitalist USA is than China.
    5
  5791. China 100% responsible? The government has made it clear that China does not control North Korea, and there are no Chinese military bases in N. Korea, whereas America has military bases in South Korea. North Korea doesn't threaten Chinese cities, only US military bases in South Korea, Okinawa Japan and Guam, so why should China get involved with this conflict between N. Korea, S. Korea and USA? This matter if for NK, SK and USA to work out among themselves, not China. It is clear that sanctions do not work on North Korea. Why continue impose sanctions, knowing that it wouldn't work? If USA withdrew its troops and military hardware from East Asia it would do more to ease tensions along Korean peninsula, than any sanctions China could ever impose on N. Korea, as shown in previous years. If same method doesn't work, why not try a different approach instead?
    5
  5792. And the people are easily appeased by bread and circuses.
    5
  5793.  @jjstudios9766  Everyone knows that if North Korea ever did attack any other country with nuclear weapons, they will be eliminated. By USA and even China. Even today, North Korean missiles are incapable of targeting the US mainland, so why treat them like a threat then?
    5
  5794. amanrehan manzer About corruption, China and India are not that far apart yes, but at least under President Xi Jinping guidance, the government is cracking down on internal corruption in the communist party. But is India actually doing anything about tackling its corruption problems? And every businessman knows that there is always risk involved and possible failure in doing business. You can't possibly expect every business venture to always succeed, and given a large number of transactions in Belt and Road Initiative, there will be bound to be some that did not turn up quite so well. That is the natural and unavoidable part of the consequence of doing business that's all. You talk about 'infrastructure' like its something unwanted, but 'infrastructure' was what led to China's development and growth in the first place. In African countries like Kenya, Nigeria, Angola, etc, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, schools, hotels, hospitals, powerstations, shopping centers, football stadiums and telecommunication projects. China has done much to develop Africa in decades, compared to what Westerners did in Africa for centuries.
    5
  5795.  @garam6555  You said: "no brits in india politics since 1947" That's what I said. Because while the physical decolonization of India is complete, the "decolonization of the mind" still needs some time to heal. Because many Indians (but not all) still suffer from "colonial mindset" and still blindly worship their former colonial masters at India's expense. Unless more Indians learn to recognise the mental damage inflicted by colonization on the mindset of the colonized, they will have a hard time decolonizing their minds.
    5
  5796. They need to get rid of American Exceptionalism first.
    5
  5797. China should focus on internal market. USA has 300 million consumers yes, but if China can transform our 1.4 billion population into consumers ourselves, then China will become the biggest consumer market in the world.
    5
  5798. China invented the paper banknote, now China is revolutionising digital Yuan. Maybe one day in the future, the digital Yuan topple the US Dollar.
    5
  5799.  @一个说话大声的中国人  Britain did way more to China than the partition of India could ever make up for it.
    5
  5800. Even Elon Musk has been criticised by Americans after Tesla opened a dealership showroom in Xinjiang's capital, Urumuqi. Video: Electric carmaker Tesla under fire for opening Xinjiang showroom youtu.be/tuuUFFar2e8
    5
  5801. What you are describing is the Mandate of Heaven 天命 which is a political doctrine intrinsic to Chinese culture. That a competent leader is allowed to rule China, while an incompetent leader will be ousted from power by rebellion, with either outcome being taken as Heaven's Will.
    5
  5802.  @smoochie3331  Cyrus is under no obligation to disclose his income. Who are you, his tax collector or something? What's wrong with receiving money from "Chinese entities"?
    5
  5803.  @smoochie3331  "神州 Shenzhou you just proved my point... when it has potential of conflict of interest." What's the conflict of interest? Cyrus Janssen's message is "building bridges between China and the West" which is in each l other's interest, so what conflict of interest is there? And Cyrus Janssen is under no obligation to disclose his income, that's his own personal information and you aren't his tax collector or something.
    5
  5804.  @xerozero976  You said: "Know the difference between the USA and China." The stimulus package given by USA was gobbled up by the rich corporations leaving hardly a cent for the remaining poor people affected. For example, the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) ran out of funds, shortly after it was implemented. Source: The Paycheck Protection Program has run out of money cnbc.com/2020/04/17/this-government-loan-program-has-run-dry-these-people-lost-out.html
    5
  5805.  @fcl3294  神州 Shenzhou Where is the statement: "The Cyrus Janssen Channel is funded in whole or in part by the Chinese Government" I just watched an advertisement on this Cyrus Janssen Channel, so who said that this channel is funded in whole by the Chinese government when he receives revenue from hosting ads?
    5
  5806. There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    5
  5807.  @andrethorpe6183  I think George Wong has no qualms about China's development, but it's just that he finds mansana posting the same message again and again rather tiresome.
    5
  5808.  Meng WAZOO CRIMINAL  Do Canadians even remember the occupations of the 2 Michaels? Whereas everyone knows Meng Wanzhou is Huawei's CFO.
    5
  5809.  @fcl3294  You said: "神州 Shenzhou I see that you are equating aDislike for the CCP as a dislike for Chinese people." Did I ever said that? It's actually Liu Xiaobo himself that dislikes Chinese people. Liu Xiaobo strongly criticized Chinese intellectuals' "traditional attitude of searching for rationalism and harmony as a slave mentality". He literally disliked Chinese traditional mindset of being rational and harmonious here. Liu Xiaobo also supported Western Imperialism, he said: "modernization means wholesale westernization, choosing a human life is choosing a Western way of life. The difference between the Western and the Chinese governing system is humane vs in-humane, there's no middle ground ... Westernization is not a choice of a nation, but a choice for the human race." How much more Western Imperialist can Liu Xiaobo be? Given his views, it's no wonder he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his contribution to Western Imperialism
    5
  5810.  @fcl3294  "The writer of this was given 11 years in prison by the CPC. And the Nobel Peace Prize by the world" Because the writer's views espoused Western Imperialism. Liu Xiaobo strongly criticized Chinese intellectuals' "traditional attitude of searching for rationalism and harmony as a slave mentality". In a 1988 interview with Hong Kong's Liberation Monthly (now known as Open Magazine), Liu said "modernization means wholesale westernization, choosing a human life is choosing a Western way of life. The difference between the Western and the Chinese governing system is humane vs in-humane, there's no middle ground ... Westernization is not a choice of a nation, but a choice for the human race." In other words, Liu is stating that every country in the world has to adopt Western-style Democracy. No exceptions allowed. In other words, Liu suffers from the "colonial mentality" of worshiping Anglo-Saxon culture and putting it on a pedestal, while simultaneously harboring disdain for any non-white culture (including his own). Because of this, Liu Xiaobo became an instrument for the West, who awarded him the Nobel Peace Prize for his promoting of Western Imperialism. Liu was quoted to have said, "If I were to make this I would show just how wimpy, spineless and fked-up [齷齪、軟弱和操蛋] the Chinese really are" so who is the one with the dislike for Chinese people here?
    5
  5811.  @fcl3294  You said: "The PRC has gone from extremly bad to just very bad." Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today, and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending. China has become the largest trading partner of many countries in the world, and China is currently at peace and not in a state of war with any country since our last conflict in 1979. In terms of freedom, Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Before 2019, everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending coin on your tourist industry. Western schools and universities were positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their local peers. China was the world's largest source of outbound tourists and international students, yet you're claiming Chinese aren't free? In terms of quality of life, China's life expectancy has surpassed the U.S. Chinese are expected to live up to 77.1 years, compared to American's 76.1 years. It means that the gap in longevity at birth between people in the US and China has now widened to a full year. Poverty alleviation is at the forefront of the communist party's goals. According to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty; China's poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015, as measured by the percentage of people living on the equivalent of US$1.90 or less per day in 2011 purchasing price parity terms, (which still stands in 2022.)
    5
  5812.  @fcl3294  Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of the Great Chinese Famine, caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, resulting in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong himself couldn't possibly control the weather, isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because Mao's goal is to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. Also, the Great Chinese Famine was between 1959 and 1961. But in 1955, China's population was 605 million, and by 1960, China's population actually increased to 667.07 million, having increased by 67 million. So you're saying that from 1959-1961, there were 60+ million killed (around 10% of China's entire population) yet from 1955 to 1960, China's population actually increased by 67 million? Then why is China currently the country with the world's largest population, if you claim China had lost 10% of our population?
    5
  5813.  @bartonlee3594  About the per capita GDP comparison, remember that mainland China has the world's largest population (at estimated 1.4 billion people) whereas Taiwan island has a only a fraction of the mainland's population (23 million). So on the per capita basis, if you divide the mainland's GDP by our enormous population, of course the mainland's GDP per capital is not as high as Taiwan with their smaller population size. If you want to compare per capita GDP with big countries, take India for example. India is the world's 2nd most populous country after China, and yet China's per capita GDP 5 times the size of India's.
    5
  5814. The United States is weaponizing the U.S dollar, an better alternative would be to get banks to stop conducting transactions in U.S dollar to deprive the U.S.A of its weapon.
    5
  5815.  @vinod_kumar_28  China has settled border disputes with all of its land neighbors (except for two). -In 1960, Myanmar and China signed a border treaty. -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed a border treaty. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed a border treaty. -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed a border treaty. -In 1963, Nepal and China signed a border treaty. -In 1964, North Korea and China signed a border treaty. -In 1991, Soviet Union and China signed a border treaty. -In 1992, Laos and China signed a border treaty. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed a border treaty. -In 1996, Kyrgyzstan and China signed a border treaty. -In 1999, Tajikistan and China signed a border treaty. -In 1999, Vietnam and China signed a border treaty. ... Only India and Bhutan have not signed a border treaty with China. China has had 19 rounds of border talks with India, and 25 rounds of border talks with Bhutan which still haven't resolve our border dispute. But it's certainly not from a lack of trying that China's border with these two countries remain unresolved.
    5
  5816.  @andraslippai3169  The population of Uighurs in Xinjiang has actually increased by 14% since 2010..
    5
  5817.  @theheavenlyoption  "We've seen Chinese fighter jets encroaching in Taiwanese airspace" Since when did People's Liberation Army Airforce (PLAAF) fighters entered Taiwan's airspace? PLAAF fighters did not fly over Taiwan's airspace, they entered Taiwan's Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) which is not recognized airspace.
    5
  5818.  @theheavenlyoption  "we've seen the little islands in south china sea that china has built as military bases" Which little islands in the SCS has China built as military bases? According to Wikipedia: List of countries with overseas military bases, China has less than a handful of overseas bases, none of which are located in SCS. Whereas the United States has over 400+ overseas military bases, in Japan, South Korea, Philippines, etc, surrounding China.
    5
  5819.  Gaylord Manlove  Source: German IT watchdog says 'no evidence' of Huawei spying thelocal.de/20181216/german-it-watchdog-says-no-evidence-of-huawei-spying Germany's IT watchdog has expressed scepticism about calls for a boycott of Chinese telecoms giant Huawei, saying it has seen no evidence the firm could use its equipment to spy for Beijing, news weekly Spiegel reported Friday. "For such serious decisions like a ban, you need proof," the head of Germany's Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Arne Schönbohm, told Spiegel, adding that his agency had no such evidence.
    5
  5820.  @everythingandmore5537  For the last eleven years the United States government, in a covert operation born of cynicism and hypocrisy, has collaborated with the genocidal Khmer Rouge in Cambodia. More specifically, Washington has covertly aided and abetted the Pol Potists' guerrilla war to overthrow the Vietnamese backed government of Prime Minister Hun Sen, which replaced the Khmer Rouge regime. The U.S. government's secret partnership with the Khmer Rouge grew out of the U.S. defeat in the Vietnam War. After the fall of Saigon in 1975, the U.S.-worried by the shift in the Southeast Asian balance of power-turned once again to geopolitical confrontation. It quickly formalized an anti-Vietnamese, anti-Soviet strategic alliance with China-an alliance whose disastrous effects have been most evident in Cambodia. For the U.S., playing the "China card" has meant sustaining the Khmer Rouge as a geopolitical counterweight capable of destabilizing the Hun Sen government in Cambodia and its Vietnamese allies. …… During his reign as National Security Adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski played an important role in determining how the U.S. would support the Pol Pot guerrillas. Elizabeth Becker, an expert on Cambodia, recently wrote, "Brzezinski himself claims that he concocted the idea of persuading Thailand to cooperate fully with China in efforts to rebuild the Khmer Rouge.... Brzezinski said, " I encouraged the Chinese to support Pol Pot. I encouraged the Thai to help the DK [Democratic Kampuchea]. The question was how to help the Cambodian people. Pol Pot was an abomination. We could not support him but China could." …… Source: Third World Traveller: On the Side of Pol Pot: U.S. Supports Khmer Rouge thirdworldtraveler.com/US_ThirdWorld/US_PolPot.html by Jack Colhoun
    5
  5821.  @everythingandmore5537  Since China's authoritarian system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then why is it unfathomable to you that China continue our own political system? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    5
  5822.  @vishnuvijwani  Why don't you offer your perspective then? In my perspective, the Hong Kong rioters are destroying their city, paralysing the MTR arteries, and chasing away tourists to Hong Kong and spooking investors to take their money out of Hong Kong. What's your perspective?
    5
  5823.  @TheBaconEarBuccaneer  So is the Hong Kong MTR system, in which millions of HKers depend on, a mainland affiliated company?
    5
  5824. Hong Kong had been under authoritarian British colonial rule for 156 years and did not enjoy democracy under British rule. Only during period of Hong Kong handover to mainland China, did Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for the first time.
    5
  5825.  @Jordie-c4k  You sound like the headlines about China from Western magazines since 1990 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    5
  5826.  @bjrnhjortshjandersen1286  There are many differences yes. But the main point of comparing Chess vs Go, is that Westerners are interested in short term gains, whereas China is interested in long term benefits.
    5
  5827.  @illdrumatik391  "神州 Shenzhou Your of the 50 cent people" Did I mention anything about the Chinese Communist Party here in this thread? Then why are you accusing me of being 50 cent?
    5
  5828. During 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to spread the addiction throughout rest of China and Hong Kong was taken and made into British colony. Even after Britain renounced ownership over it's former colonies, Hong Kong wasn't even fully returned back to China, and China had to sign 50 year declaration with Britain for them to handover what was originally ours.
    5
  5829. ​ @eltyjamessmith3482  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc, in developing countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan as well as African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Whereas the United States is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, etc, even in the 21st century. The US is enacting regime change by bombing those countries and cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now it appears Assad of Syria and Maduro of Venezuela are next on this list.
    5
  5830. Facebook is can be said to be one of the worst creations of the Internet. There's even a Chinese joke about Facebook: the name itself sounds like Fēisǐ bùkě (非死不可) in Mandarin, which translates to "Must Die!" or "Have to Die!"
    5
  5831.  @radiostated  Why don't you attempt to refute my points instead of insulting me with profanities? Hong Kong was part of China before the British stole it from us and used it as a drug distribution hub to spread addiction through rest of China and poison our people.
    5
  5832.  @perrychrispy1  The CCP leaders appoint the HK leaders as part of Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (Chinese: 香港基本法第四十五條) which states the following: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." - Hong Kong Basic Law, Article 45 So what's wrong with CCP appointing the HK leaders, since that is part of the terms of the agreement put forth by Britain and China during the Hong Kong's handover?
    5
  5833. The Tonight Show with John Oliver cites polls in Taiwan that indicate only a minority (5.6%) of Taiwanese wanting independence. The vast majority (87%) of Taiwanese polled want the status quo to continue. And the status quo (according to Republic of China's constitution) is that Taiwan is part of China.
    5
  5834. If your government don't control religion, then slowly, religion will start to control your government. Historically, the Christian churches held tremendous power over the monarchy, and the same goes for Islamic countries, that's why you have Holy Wars, the Crusades, Jihard, and other religious wars. Even the U.S president swears upon the Holy Bible today. What China is doing is teaching Chinese citizens to love China, putting China 1st and their religion 2nd. China is teaching Uighurs to put the country above their God.
    5
  5835.  @johnnyrommel4113  About Hong Kong, during the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us. That's where the One Country Two Systems policy comes into play. China is the only country in the world to allow multiple political systems (Hong Kong's, Macau's and the mainland's) to exist within our borders. No other country in the world has such a system. It is as though North Korea and South Korea agree to reunify as a single country, Korea, while allowing both to Kepp their respective governments. That's the One Country, Two Systems Policy.
    5
  5836.  @johnnyrommel4113  Prior to the meeting in Alaska, the Biden administration slapped fresh sanctions on Chinese officials one day before the Chinese diplomats left China for Alaska, in order to negotiate from a position of strength. The US delegates even try to use a high moral ground on China, claiming Xinjiang, Tibet, Hong Kong, Taiwan issues, which are all China's internal affairs. If you travel to your neighbour's house and the host complain about your family affairs (while the hosts own internal family is rioting and shooting) then why should China tolerate USA interference into the our internal affairs?
    5
  5837.  @sparkeyjones6261  Let's be clear that USA did not help China join the WTO. When World Trade Organisation was formed in 1995, China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate our country as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because the United States, European countries, and Japan requested that China first reform various tariff policies, including tariff reductions, open markets and industrial policies. That's why China had a late entry into WTO in 2001, instead of being a founding member of WTO in 1995. Because the USA and its allies posed obstacles to China's entry into WTO.
    5
  5838.  @MarkYeung1  Russia's objective is not to capture the major cities, the Russian army is pounding the Azov Battalion in the Donbass region. And you're claiming 10,000 Russian soldiers have been killed, but where are the dead bodies? The method of calculation is that they count the number of destroyed Russian vehicles and multiplied it by each vehicle's maximum capacity to arrive at the figure of 10,000, which is ridiculous.
    5
  5839.  Miniature Jayhawk  Korea was once a single unified country during Joseon Dynasty, until Korea was occupied by the Japanese during WWII. After the Japanese surrendered, Korea was (needlessly) divided into North Korea (Soviet Union) and South Korea (USA). North Korea was the strong country on the peninsula and wanted to end this humiliating division of their country, and they almost succeeded. North Korea had achieved around 90% unification, until the USA suddenly declare war on North Korea and intervened in this Korean Civil War. The Americans pushed the North Koreans back past the 38th Line of Division and into actual North Korean territory, right up to China's doorstep (i.e Liaoning province). In the end China agreed to help North Korea push the Americans and South Koreans back to the 38th Line of Division. As for Vietnam, the Vietnamese had their villages carpet bombed and torched by napalm from America (remember Napalm Girl?). American soldiers sprayed chemical defoliants that caused birth defects in Vietnamese children decades later. Mines were planted by American soldiers that have killed/maimed many innocent Vietnamese. Are you sure the Americans were sympathetic to the Vietnamese? The Americans withdrew from Saigon and left the South Vietnamese to their fate.
    5
  5840. South East Asia is has 680 million people which is 50 percent more than the EU and more than twice as many as the U.S, so it's a prime investment spot for future growth.
    5
  5841.  @Libertas-ws6eo  He may be a mortal, but his writings (and thus his name) is immortal and lives on long after his passing, which is why we know of him today. Had Galileo been one to cower in fear in the face of persecution, he wouldn't have set foot on this path. He could have given in to the pressure and save his own skin, but he didn't. Our time on Earth is short, but our words and actions are long lasting.
    5
  5842. 本来，中国是想拉上印度发展的，印度有巨大的人口基数，中国可以将一些产业转移到印度，这样中印可谓互惠互利。但是，由于中印关系不睦，这一战略机遇印度正在失去，中国提出的“一带一路”倡议却不等人，印度相当于一定程度上错过了这一战略机遇。这样的机会一旦错过将不再，印度未来可能将无法承接大量制造业。
    5
  5843. Meanwhile, as of March 2021, Canada has secured over 300 million doses of Covid-19 vaccines, enough to cover it's population 5 times over. Here's a list of countries by number of Covid-19 vaccine doses procured per person. 1. Canada (8.7x it's population) 2. United Kingdom (7.3x it's population) 3. New Zealand (6.6x it's population) 4. Australia (5.1x it's population) 5. Chile (5.7x it's population) 6. European Union (4.6x it's population) 7. United States (4x it's population) ... Source: Duke Global Health Innovation Center youtu.be/2ty2J0s2W0c?t=182 Imagine 1 Canadian having access to 5 vaccines, while elsewhere in the world, 10 Africans have to fight for access to 1 vaccine.
    5
  5844.  @MarkYeung1  Like what Anonymous said, simply call her directly. What communication issue are you talking about? Didn't you stated earlier that mainland Chinese are participating in the comment section?
    5
  5845.  @juanreese6933  Firstly, why should Chinese have to "assimilate" when we literally make up a greater percentage of the world population than Americans? Secondly, there are far more Chinese that speak English (i.e Chinese Americans) than there are Westerners that speak Mandarin Chinese, so doesn't that prove that Chinese assimilate better than Westerners?
    5
  5846.  @christianrodm  "神州 Shenzhou maintaining eye contact has nothing to do with whether someone is being honest." What do you even know? Eye contact is vital component of telling whether someone is being honest, and its literally the first thing people look out for. Yet you're just gonna dismiss it like that?
    5
  5847.  @christianrodm  And you're argument is that " keeping the gaze without breaking for an extended time is more likely to be a sign someone is trying to lie." but I never said anything in my posts about having an extended duration of eye contact at all. All I said was that they maintained eye contact and they aren't shy or looking away from the camera that's all.
    5
  5848. +Micah August China is slowly progressing towards becoming more innovative over time. According to Global Innovation Index rankings, China was ranked 22nd most innovative country in 2017. Before that, China was 25th in 2016, and 29th in 2015, so it is clear China is progressing in the innovation index ranking. What will China's 2018 ranking be? And what will China's 2020 ranking be? Source:globalinnovationindex (dot) org/analysis-indicator
    5
  5849. @Luciuswolf China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020, China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020, China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. So China had actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them.
    5
  5850.  @linustw  You're already a grown adult (presumably) and these are just schoolchildren in Guangdong, what makes you think schoolchildren's Cantonese will be better than yours?
    5
  5851. India and Pakistan are actually brother states, sharing a common history (Mughal rule, British colonial rule, etc) right up to the partition of British India in 1947. But both India and Pakistan been fighting each other for about 70 years already, so why not attempt to mend relations instead? South Asia can only progress if its people are committed to making their countries better, instead of constantly opposing one another.
    5
  5852. ​ @ChiefCabioch  "can you own weapons?" In China, martial arts practitioners can own martial arts weapons like jian 剑 (Tai Chi Sword), dao 刀 (Chinese Broadsword), and even wield them out in public parks while practicing Tai Chi and other martial arts.
    5
  5853.  @lindigregory119  You said: _"Then he killed the ancient and rich Chinese culture. Most Chinese people today have no idea about the ancient Chinese history that existed for thousands of years up until Mao."_ What makes you say Chinese culture is destroyed and most Chinese people today have no idea of our history? China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Egypt, Mesopotamia and Rome have since succumbed to history. Throughout our history, China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to the modern day relatively intact. I mean, China has many historical monuments like for example, the The Great Wall of China, the Forbidden City, The Qin Emperor Tomb (China's First Emperor), the Terracotta Army, The Grand Canal (world's longest artificial river). If you look up list of UNESCO World Heritage Sites, China actually ranks 2nd in the world after Italy. Countries by number of UNESCO World Heritage Sites as of July 2021 1. Italy (58 sites) 2. China (56 sites) 3. Germany (51 sites) 4. France (49 sites) 5. Spain (49 sites) 6. India (40 sites) 7. Mexico (35 sites) 8. United Kingdom (33 sites) 9. Russia (30 sites) 10. Iran (26 sites) ... Source: UNESCO World Heritage Yet you claim Chinese culture is destroyed and most Chinese don't know about our history?
    5
  5854.  @adamperdue3178  You said: "(Such as- Nazi Germany, many Empires, the USSR, and China, to give a few examples)" Just wanted to point out that the Nazi Party was elected by the German people through Hitler preying on German people's resentment towards the humiliating Treaty of Versailles and he promised to make Germany great again. Much like Trump's MAGA campaign. You said: "1) There's so many abstractions here that by the time it gets to regional politics, let alone the federal level, the will of the people has been muddled so much as to become meaningless." China has the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people, it's almost a given that determining the "people's will" is going to be a messy affair. Such a system has to be streamlined into the central government which "charts the direction China is taking", while the local provincial governments implements those policies at the local level. The CPC is in charge of long-term planning and all of China, whereas the local governments are in charge of short-term planning and the local regions. Ultimately, the local people's interests are subservient to all of China's interests. For example, the people of Shanghai may not like the lockdowns, but it is necessary in order to prevent the spread to other Chinese cities. You said: "2) Any individual candidate that runs for office, runs at the will of the CCP." Because in theory, the Communist Party of China is supposed to represent China itself. I know this is a difficult concept for many foreigners to grasp but most Chinese really believe that the CPC is China, and China is the CPC, and the two are inseparable. An individual has to be really, really, anti-China himself/herself, to be disallowed to run for office by the CPC. For example, if an individual wants to allow Western Imperialism into China, of course he/she would not be given approval by the CPC. And in the scenario where the CPC declines to the point where they are no longer representative of China, they will eventually be overthrown by the people. It has happened before many times throughout Chinese history, with the overthrow of tyrannical Chinese emperors. This means that the CPC has to constantly strive to represent China the best it can. You said: "3) China is by and large a 1 party system." The thing is, China's single party has total representation of all 100% of Chinese people's interests (or at least 80-90%). Whereas in a two party system like in the United States, there is only partial representation of American people's interests by either the Democrats or the Republicans, in perhaps around 51% of American's interest. This generates disgruntlement among the 49% that didn't vote for the winning party. (Note: Some believe the Democrats and Republican representation is even lower, perhaps representing only 1% of the Americans, if you know which 1% I'm referring to)
    5
  5855.  @L98fiero  Sounds like the Western MSM is "conclusion shopping". They jump to a conclusion, and then shop for evidence that supports that conclusion, while disregarding other evidences that don't support it. The media outlets then sell that package to their audiences, many of whom gobble up the lies unquestioningly.
    5
  5856. In China, you can't change the government, but the policies are changing. In the U.S, you can change the government, but the policies remain unchanged.
    5
  5857. About the alleged use of chemical weapons by Syrian regime, back then, former US president Bush invaded Iraq on suspicion of Iraq harboring WMD. But after invading Iraq, there weren't any evidence uncovered of Iraq actually harboring WMD at all. So why did Bush cook up an excuse to invade Iraq just like that?
    5
  5858. The Syrian government is not an elected government, but does that mean that it must adopt an elected government? Look at USA invading Middle East and cutting off their country's heads, like Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein, all in the name of "democracy" but did democracy actually make the Middle East better in the end? Why is USA so focused on spreading democracy, just like when the old Soviet Union was spreading communism? Chinese government however, has clearly stated that our government system is not for export.
    5
  5859.  @MarkYeung1  I do not presume to speak on behalf of the people of Taiwan, but it appears that according to polls, Tsai Ing-Wen's approval ratings have fallen to a 21-month low, so (E) may not be the choice for some people in Taiwan.
    5
  5860. Look at China. China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    5
  5861.  @Youdontshushh  "神州 Shenzhou i wonder why every virus started in China" You're the biased Filipino who lost the argument against me and unable to refute my points, so you start resorting to hurling personal insults against me. Look at Bird Flu, Swine Flu, H1N1, MERS (Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome) or other virus outbreak occur regardless of wet markets in China so why do you claim every virus started in China?
    5
  5862. China has soft power in the form of the "Made in China" label, and slowly Chinese brands like Huawei, Tencent, Ailibaba are becoming recognized globally.
    5
  5863.  @augustuswoods4548  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA in all 3 subjects: reading, science and mathematics. PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    5
  5864.  @richarde.halliburton8022  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    5
  5865.  @richarde.halliburton8022  "神州 Shenzhou Thank you for your thoughtfyl reply to my comments" I try not to resort to hurling personal insults against others for their views (unlike those who call me ultra-nationalist or communist shill), I try to argue with points brought up where possible. You said: "China's "rise" post war with Japan would have been achieved much faster and with much less suffering had the Republic of China (Nationalist) forces prevailed against the Communists in 1949," So the question is why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, and solidifies the Communist's right to rule the mainland after 1949. I mean, the KMT literally lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, starving communist peasant conscripts, then why should they deserve to rule the mainland? During the ROC (1912-1949) era, there was hyperinflation as KMT kept on printing money. There were also numerous famines during ROC era, such as 1920–1921 North China Famine, 1928–1930 Northern China Famine, 1936–1937 Sichuan-Gansu Famine, 1942–1943 Henan Famine and others. So there is no guarantee that had the KMT succeeded over the Communists, they would have avoided the Great Chinese Famine, given their history of famines during ROC period.
    5
  5866.  杨健  I heard in Philippines, they are allowing Muslims to vote in a referendum on the proposed creation of an autonomous region in Southern Philippines, which if successful, would create a new Islamic country south of Philippines. Source: Philippines: Muslims vote in referendum on autonomous region theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/21/philippines-muslims-vote-in-referendum-on-new-autonomous-region It's like they are allowing Muslims in the Philippines to do as they please, instead of actually getting Muslims to assimilate into Philippine predominantly Christian culture.
    5
  5867.  @zackk4969  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"? Video: Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' youtu.be/DPt-zXn05ac
    5
  5868. USA will win without a doubt, laughing at China and India fighting each other (possibly dragging Russia into this conflict as well) and destroying the fragile economic growth Asia experienced the past few years, and allowing USA to race further ahead of its rivals in Asia.
    5
  5869. That's how other sanctioned countries like Venezuela and Cuba are able to survive.
    5
  5870.  @marysylvie2012  I did not ask you how many times you visited China. You said you've been to China several times, I'm asking you which part of our vast country of China did you visit? Which cities or regions did you visit?
    5
  5871.  @junebug8485  Weren't you the one looking down on Chinese companies, Chinese industries and Chinese culture in your other post?
    5
  5872. China is the 1st country to successfully mount a electromagnetic railgun on to a mobile platform (like a naval vessel) and have successfully test fired the experimental railgun while at sea. Even the USA hasn't been able to get its railgun out of its research facilities.
    5
  5873. China is home to the world's fastest supercomputer, the Sunway Taihu Light 神威·太湖之光. In a recent Top500 fastest supercomputer survey, China beat USA, with our 202 of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source:China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/
    5
  5874.  @abdulrahmanzubairu8371  "神州 Shenzhou First time meeting a Chinese person on youtube" Is there something wrong with a Chinese person being on YouTube?
    5
  5875. China had put forth numerous 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans to map out China's direction and future in 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition.
    5
  5876.  @NaughtyNovaroo69  If you claim Taiwan is the real China then why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1919) lost the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China.
    5
  5877. Agreed, it's just capitalism at work on Japan, where the Japanese government rather release the irradiated waters into the sea than spend more money building storage facilities or seeking better treatment. Why not Japan cancel the Tokyo Olympics and use the money to treat the irradiated waters? Capitalism, that's why, because it's not profitable.
    5
  5878. Not to be overly boastful, but many studies have shown that East Asians are among the world's most diligent and intelligent people, with long histories and rich, diverse cultures. Western powers are strong because EU (28 countries) is united together with America (50 states). Even in South East Asia, there is ASEAN group that caters to the regional interests of South East Asian countries. So why can't we have a unified East Asian union as well, that caters to our own regional interests as well?
    5
  5879. What makes you think those websites are banned in China? According to statistics, there were an estimated 210 million Chinese people watching YouTube in 2022. There are around 3.22 million Facebook users in China and 2.8 million Instagram users in China
    5
  5880.  @OWO-oj7dw  "Shenzhou. Well indeed they are banned in China..." They are blocked but not banned in China. Nobody will come arrest you just for watching YouTube or having a Facebook/Instagram account while in China. Which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    5
  5881. Here's a Chinese analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family, which in turn would lead them right up to her ex-husband's doorstep. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    5
  5882. Chinese aggression? It was United States that invaded Philippines during Philippine–American War in 1899 and resulted in American occupation of the Philippines and dissolution of the First Philippine Republic. The Philippines becomes an unincorporated territory of the United States (like Guam and Puerto Rico) and an estimated 200,000 to 250,000 total Filipino civilians dead at the hands of American soldiers. Philippine–American War en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine–American_War In contrast, China and Philippines did not have any war so what Chinese aggression are you talking about? You don't even know your own country's history, yet you always love Americans for what they done to your country? Also, you think Philippines coastguard is not harassing other ships? Philippines coastguard even opened fire and killed fishermen. scmp.com/news/china/article/1234433/taiwan-demands-philippines-probe-fishermans-death
    5
  5883.  @ivanmunoz4484  "America protected China against Japan by dropping nuclear Missiles killing million is that a bad thing ?" Imperial Japan had invaded China in 1931, and the Americans were content to let Japan occupy more and more Chinese territory. USA only joined in the war against Japan in 1942, after Pearl Harbor was bombed so please don't act as though America was doing it for China's sake, it was for their own sake. Also, Japan refused to surrender even after U.S bombed two Japanese cities, it was after the Soviet invasion of Japanese occupied Manchuria that was the last campaign fought of WWII and finally caused Japan to surrender. So we should be thanking the Soviet Communists for finally putting an end to WWII.
    5
  5884.  @ivanmunoz4484  But again, those U.S nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki mostly killed Japanese civilians, women, children, the elderly, and men unfit for active front line military duty. The change to the strength of Japanese Army was negligible after the bombings of its cities, and that's why Imperial Japan refused to surrender. What finally got Japan to surrender was the Soviet Invasion of Japanese occupied Manchuria (the last campaign of WWII) and that's when Japan finally surrendered at the end of WWII, so isn't it the Soviet communists that finally defeated the Japanese and ended WWII?
    5
  5885.  @Srikar-on9ib  ‪Look at what India did‬ ‪1947 annex Kashmir ‬ ‪1949 annex Manipur ‬ ‪1949 annex Tripura ‬ ‪1951 hitting south Tibet ‬ ‪1954 annex Nagaland ‬ ‪1961 annex Goa‬ ‪1962 annex karapani of Nepal‬ ‪1962 attack China‬ ‪1971 annex Turtuk of Pakistan ‬ ‪1972 annex Tin Bigha of Bangladesh‬ 1975 attack and annex Sikkim 1983 attack Mauritius ‬ ‪1987 invade Sri Lanka ‬ ‪1990 attack Bhutan ‬ ‪2006 annex Dooars of Bhutan ‬ ‪2013 annex Moreh of Burma ‬ ‪2017 attack China ‬ ‪2017 attack Bhutan ‬ ‪2018 invade Maldives‬ ‪2020 attacking one Chinese soilder with plenty of soilders first‬ ‪2020 break the border deal that made by China and India and said they killed 5 Chinese soilder
    5
  5886.  Moonland Almond  You said: "We went to China to study Chinese language." 你真的去过中国学中文吗？那你应该知道“东突厥斯坦”是西方旅行家、地理学家用于描述塔里木盆地一带的地理概念之一，19世纪初因俄国汉学家的使用而传播开来，历史上从未有过这样的国家。
    5
  5887.  @zszs100  Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a compiled list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    5
  5888. Agreed. NATO was formed in response to Soviet Union's rising military might, but after the USSR dissolved in 1991, NATO no longer serves any interests (except the U.S's interest in maintaining it's hegemonic rule).
    5
  5889. In 1995, China's population was 605 million. In 1960, China's population actually grew to 667 million, having increased by 62 million in 5 years. Yet you're claiming that from 1958 to 1962, China's population decreased by 50 million in 4 years?
    5
  5890. I've heard Japan also has long working hours, and salary men aren't expected to return home until late into the night.
    5
  5891. "I now deny saying what I said, even though im on camera saying it". This is not the first time, previously on 17 November, Peng Shuai wrote an email to WTA claiming that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    5
  5892.  @smith2354  The South China Sea maritime conflict is bloodless so far, there hasn't been any war erupting in the SCS over those islands. In fact, ASEAN countries and China negotiating maritime border disputes through dialogue.
    5
  5893. Asians should realise this: As China rises, the living conditions of Asians increase. If China is demonised, then Asians all over the world are going to suffer, regardless if you are Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and so on.
    5
  5894.  @raymondhoffman3587  About the reporters wanting to leave Hong Kong, I watched the coverage of the 2019 Hong Kong riots and just a glance at the number of people wearing journalist vests, it's as though the number of journalists practically outnumber the HK police in each video. Given such extensive journalistic coverage, why are many Western audiences seemingly unaware of the atrocities of burning, looting, vandalism, attacks on passers-by, perpetuated by the Hong Kong rioters? Even the footage of an elder Hong Kong man being doused in flammable liquid and ignited by protestors was largely unseen among Western audiences. It's apparent that many of those reporters were biased against the HKPF, so they are trying to escape to the West.
    5
  5895.  @steventan2550  It's become a plutocracy, not a democracy.
    5
  5896. @Panda Bear Some employees may crave respect and recognition more than receiving a bonus. What's the point in getting paid more, if you feel like you aren't getting the respect you deserve?
    5
  5897. Perhaps most important (in my opinion) is the historical differences. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country until Mao Zedong and the Communist revolution unified China. Deng Xiaoping modified the economic policies in late 1970s, and China's political system is still constantly evolving, learning both the good and bad aspects of capitalism from the USA. Whereas the USA is suffering from political stagnation, the U.S constitution hasn't changed since 150 years ago, and USA has known no other political apart from liberal democracy and capitalism (since the Industrial Revolution). And worst, USA is unwilling to learn lessons from other countries success.
    5
  5898.  @dedoshucos  It's actually USA that's in denial here. Check out this Once upon a virus video: youtu.be/Q5BZ09iNdvo
    5
  5899.  @canman5060  Tyrant which rule China for 70 years? Hong Kong itself was under authoritarian British Colonial rule from 1841 to 1997 (a brief Japanese occupation from 1941 to 1945) and during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held in Hong Kong during this period. Only after the Hong Kong handover to mainland China, did Hong Kong people finally hold regular elections, so isn't it thanks to China that Hong Kong citizens can vote in elections today?
    5
  5900.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Let's get this straight, it was you who brought up aerial superiority when you mentioned: "神州 Shenzhou Poland has agreed to hand over is MIG 29s" all I asked is how will they deliver it to Ukraine? Does the Ukrainian army have enough pilots to operate those MiGs? Where will the MiGs take off from? And you accuse me of deflecting and redirecting, but it was Zelenskyy himself that lamented Ukraine being "abandoned" by NATO. Even the USA has resisted Ukraine's pleas to impose a no-fly zone over Ukraine, and NATO isn't sending any troops to defend Ukraine. Ukraine is unlikely to succeed in joining NATO, because that would mean NATO is obliged to send reinforcements to NATO, so it appears that the best course of action is for Zelenskyy to surrender Ukraine, instead of using civilians as a human meat shield.
    5
  5901.  @jaimemartinez9792  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    5
  5902. China's supercomputer Tianhe-1 (天河-1) found that the lungs of a young American vaper hospitalized in USA for "mysterious pneumonia" last summer could be exhibiting Covid-19. scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3079046/chinese-supercomputer-and-american-doctors-clash-over-ai
    5
  5903. Capitalism favors monopolies, just look at American monopolies like Amazon, Apple, Google, Facebook dominating their respective industries and eliminating competition from smaller American companies. China actually has anti-monopoly law, cracking down on Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, to clamp down on anti-competitive practices in the industry.
    5
  5904.  @Shadowless_Kick  You said: "what was so shocking was that Hu was forced to leave in the middle of such an important meeting and almost nobody around him dared to turn head to see what was going on." Chinese politicians are not so easily distracted, the Party Congress proceedings are far more important. Hu Jintao was escorted into the People's Hall by an aide, and he was similarly escorted out most likely for health reasons. Some old folk might behave stubbornly if people around them fuss about their health, and this could be the reason behind Hu's reluctance to leave. But it should be noted that Hu sat directly next to Xi so isn't it a show of respect from Xi to Hu?
    5
  5905. In the past, Hong Kong was a unique Chinese port city, a world finance center closest to mainland China, but today, Hong Kong has since fallen behind and been overtaken by rising mainland cities in the area like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhoushan, and is facing similar levels of competition from mainland cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian, and so on. Sources: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage Shanghai in particular, has become global financial centre and transport hub, so its no wonder why some Hong Kong people feel that Hong Kong is losing its "uniqueness" as it has fallen behind other rising mainland cities.
    5
  5906. @Logistik China offered Spain a list of approved Chinese suppliers to purchase from, but Spain choose to buy from unapproved company, Bioeasy, which is not on the list of approved companies, so why blame China for Spain choosing a company not on the list?
    5
  5907.  @friarsteve7683  Cryptocurrency like Bitcoin is literally backed by nothing, making it risky to invest in. And not only that, because of it's privacy, criminals are using cryptocurrency to launder money, and ransomware hackers are demanding payment in Bitcoin from their victims, so that it can't be traced back to them. As a result, cryptocurrency is emboldening criminal activities in the world. Additionally, Bitcoin mining consumes copious amounts of power and electricity, around 91 terawatt-hours of electricity annually. That's more annual electricity use than all of Finland, which is a country of 5.5 million people and almost 0.5% of all electricity consumption worldwide. If this power is drawn from fossil fuels, it's just polluting the our atmosphere for basically... nothing. Just so that criminals can get rich and get away with crimes.
    5
  5908. +Borgil Batbaatar According to (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qing_dynasty ) The Manchus identified their state as "China" 中國, and the emperors equated lands of Qing state (including present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, Tibet and other areas) as "China" in both Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as multi-ethnic state, and rejecti the idea that "China" only meant Han areas. The Qing emperors proclaimed both Han and non-Han peoples were part of "China". They used both "China" and "Qing" to refer to their state in official documents and often used "Qing" and "China" interchangeably.
    5
  5909.  @sunnyjim1355  "神州 Shenzhou You think China is providing this aid out of the kindness of it's heart?" Did my comment ever expressed such an opinion? China needs resources to fuel our growth and those Pacific Island nations are concerned about climate change, so China strives to achieve a win-win deal with other countries, whereas the U.S strives use other countries to further it's own hegemonic interests.
    5
  5910. 老实说，翻墙之后， 就觉得西方媒体对中国很傲慢与偏见。 其实很多西方人没来过中国，但已经被西方媒体洗脑了，就觉得中国人没有自由。
    5
  5911.  @FAILkipedia  Satellite images indicate that Volnovakha and Schastia still have houses intact, what are you talking about? And this mobile crematorium technology, why didn't Russia made use of them to cover up the bodies in Bucca instead of leaving them for the Ukrainians to "discover"?
    5
  5912.  @fclopez1  Previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong had been under authoritarian British colonial rule, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong while it was a British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to the Communist Party of China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    5
  5913. laowhy seems to be imposing his own "American viewpoint" into a Chinese show, meant for Chinese viewers.
    5
  5914. +Collective Toothbrush Agreed. Although the CCP isn't perfect, it's done a great job governing a country of 1.4 billion people. Most Westerners just want to overthrow the government, but don't think about where to go from there. They think of Step 1 (overthrow CCP) but they don't think of Step 2 (who's going to replace it?)
    5
  5915.  @henryv4222  In 2014, Russia had military intervention in Crimea and annexed it from Ukraine and all Washington did was impose sanctions on Moscow that's all. So what makes you think USA will go to war with China over Taiwan then?
    5
  5916.  @performancefluid3666  But you support German Chancellor Merkel being in power for so long (15 years) in fact, even longer than Chinese President Xi been in power (8 years) then why are you against China abolishing the presidential term limits, when Germany has renewable limits for their Chancellor?
    5
  5917.  @performancefluid3666  In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, reining in companies when they gone too far. Whereas in the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    5
  5918. Sri Lanka is another victim of the NED, yet Western Media tries to pin the blame on China.
    5
  5919.  @UnimpressedGoose  "神州 Shenzhou yes it’s considered propaganda in my eyes." Then you have biased eyes. Why can't Chinese government teach these Uighurs Mandarin Chinese and Chinese history and cultivate a sense of belonging here in China? Xinjiang is part of China, and Mandarin Chinese is our national language, just like how, say Hawaii is part of USA, and English is US's national language. What's the difference between our two systems in your biased eyes? Look at the West, and it is estimated that around 4,000 people have left their homes in the West to migrate to ISIS. Many have become jihadist fighters in the apparent hope of achieving martyrdom. Source: Why Are Westerners Attracted to ISIS? theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/07/isis-foreign-fighters-political-pilgrims/399209/ By doing this, China is helping preventing these Uighurs from becoming extremists and flocking to join the terrorists in the Middle East. These Uighurs are being reformed from their extremist thinking, and are provided with free education so that they can graduate and find jobs in China to become productive members of society, instead of joining the terrorists. But what is the West doing?
    5
  5920.  @christopherhamlin6139  You said: "In Vietnam it's called the East Sea and China does NOT own ANY of throes islands." Well, literally the rest of the world calls it South China Sea in their maps. Also, China has actually opened the Paracel Islands to tourism for vacationers to go diving and windsurfing, and even get married at the church on one of the islands. Sansha City on Woody Island, the biggest of the Paracels, is home to a community of 1,500 residents complete with a school, a police station and a court. Yet you claim China does not own any of those islands in the South China Sea?
    5
  5921.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  A passport is not required for Taiwan residents seeking to travel to mainland China or vice versa. What is needed is to apply for a travel permit.
    5
  5922. Love the Chinese responses here~😂 As Chinese person, I agree that India very far ahead of China in terms of democracy. Indian government spends millions of dollars choosing their leader, while Chinese government spend that money on other countries instead of ourselves. Much better to spend money on yourself than to spend on others right? That's why India is number one in world today.
    5
  5923. Here are some short, 2min videos of the Top 10 Indian Cities in 2015 and 11 Chinese cities in 2016. Video:Top 10 INDIAN CITIES in 2015 youtube.com/watch?v=WjtRxd2Njvk Video:11 Chinese cities 2016 in 2 minutes youtube.com/watch?v=G7ZRa-w9xyA
    5
  5924. Imagine being born into an open air concentration camp and being expected to spend the rest of your life there. HAMAS is the inmate next to you who decided to make a daring prison break.
    5
  5925.  @JohnBauman-h6d  Because Dr Li Wenliang is a member of the Communist Party of China.
    5
  5926.  @neil6958  Chinese universities produce the most STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) out of any other country in the world. Countries With The Most STEM Graduates 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/02/02/the-countries-with-the-most-stem-graduates-infographic/ This implies that China is going to play a much larger role in the STEM fields, given the sheer number of graduates produced in these fields.
    5
  5927.  @stopwarstop7334  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    5
  5928. Those machines still require repair and maintenance from time to time, so people can still work there.
    5
  5929. @ "putting your trust in someone or something is extremely close to trusting someone." But they aren't the same, even you're admitting to it with this statement. You specifically said I am "changing what I said" from they "trusted the US", but it's apparent you can't even quote me my exact words "they trusted the US" then how can you claim I'm changing what I said?
    5
  5930. @ "Having a level of trust” is a bit less involved than those two things." So now you're claiming the difference is only minimal? Then what's the whole point of your argument of me changing what I said? You're repeatedly failed to quote me those exact words that they "trusted the US" and now you're claiming the difference of "having a level of trust" is minimal.
    5
  5931. @ "for all practical purposes and in daily life and for the purposes of this conversation, they are the same" Who gave you the right to decide what's the same and what's not? You started off claiming that I am changing what I said, when you repeatedly failed to quote me the exact words that they "trusted the US" then how can you even continue the argument? You said: "More importantly, they are a lot different than _"putting your trust in"." That's not what you said earlier, you said "Having a level of trust" is a bit less involved than those two things" so what are you now claiming that they are a lot different after saying that the difference is minimal?
    5
  5932. @ You can't refute my points so you start questioning my English proficiency or whether I am a native speaker? You've made it all about semantics when you said that I changed my words from they "trusted the US", yet when I ask you to quote me my exact words "trusted the US", you've repeatedly failed to do so. Instead you quote some other text and then claim it is close, but even you admit they aren't the same, so how can you claim I changed my words when you can't even quote my words properly? Next, you constantly change your position, like when you first said: “Having a level of trust” is a bit less involved than those two things." meaning that the difference is minimal, to suddenly having a big difference when you said: "More importantly, they are a lot different than “putting your trust in”." then how can we trust your words? You're already proving yourself to be an unreliable commentator with these words.
    5
  5933. @ You said: "What you’re arguing about now is the same as a thief who said “I threatened to TAKE her money but I didn’t say STEAL so it’s not a crime.”" It's been established that you can't even quote someone's words correctly, how to even begin accusing others of being a thief in the first place? Then when questioned, you changed your position from "I saw him take her money" to "I didn't see him take her money" and prove to be an unreliable witness. Have you heard of the Chinese proverb 贼喊捉贼 translating to "The thief who cried "Catch that guy, he's a thief!" Because that's exactly the kind of behavior you are exhibiting here.
    5
  5934.  @zackk4969  Didn't you just mentioned Zhao Ting & Oscar earlier? And when I do the search, Baidu found around 1,310,000 relevant results when I searched for it, it says: 百度为您找到相关结果约1,310,000个。 Have you tried entering the search yourself?
    5
  5935.  @zackk4969  Who can't read English here? I did the search like you said "Zhao Ting & Oscar" and it returned around 1,310,000 relevant results, it says: 百度为您找到相关结果约1,310,000个。
    5
  5936.  @zackk4969  You're just digging a hole for yourself by repeating your claims. Anyone here can perform the search on Baidu and come up with the results, what are you talking about?
    5
  5937. Singapore hosts the US 7th Fleet, Task Force 73, which is is based in Singapore and it is it the origin of the US warships that sail to the South China Sea. US Aircraft carriers also visit Singapore before sailing to the South China Sea.
    5
  5938.  @pithikoulis  It's clear that no matter what Carrie Lam does, the Hong Kong protestors aren't going to be satisfied. Lam has formally withdrawn the HK extradition bill, yet the Hong Kong protests still continue. Lam has announced that she is open to dialogue but the protestors aren't, and they refuse to talk. Therefore, more authoritarian measures by the Hong Kong government are necessary.
    5
  5939.  @faithfulwarrior8051  About Christianity in China, the number of Christians in Communist China is growing so steadily that by 2030 it could have more churchgoers than America, according to the following source: Source: China on course to become 'world's most Christian nation' within 15 years telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/10776023/China-on-course-to-become-worlds-most-Christian-nation-within-15-years.html
    5
  5940.  @nickiseb8910  "神州 Shenzhou Greece is still there" I never specifically mentioned Greece, but I said the Republic of Rome is no more. They are perhaps the only ancient people, apart from the Chinese, that preserved the same language, culture, and national identity throughout their history.
    5
  5941.  @laserraiset3300  You said: "but most americans doesn't eat rats and bats to survive," Look up Florida Roast Bat.
    5
  5942. 虽然他离开中国多年，他仍然能保持这么好的普通话流利水平，真的很不错哦。
    5
  5943. Arlen Tsao America also have movies protraying WW2 Nazi German soldiers inaccurately. What's the big deal here? Those films are set in WW2 isn't it?
    5
  5944.  @MrJay8633  Samsung can open chip factory in the U.S but can the American worker wages compete with Chinese worker wages? Also, currently the Made-in-China Samsung phone quality is impeccable, so why pay more for American wages when they can do it cheaper with Chinese wages and still not compromise on quality?
    5
  5945.  Akimbo Soulassassin  Back in 2014, Russia had that military intervention in Crimea and annexed it from Ukraine, yet all Washington did was slap sanctions on Moscow that's all. No US-Russia war over Crimea, so what makes you think USA would go to war with China?
    5
  5946. One thing I've realized over the course of years is that the "Nobel Peace Prize" has since deviated from it's original intention, and has long been hijacked and weaponized by the United States to wield against their opponents to promote U.S interests.
    5
  5947. Chinese nickname for Trump is Chuan Jianguo which means "Make China Great." Because his 2016 election shattered the image of "democracy being the best governance" of any country, making many Chinese appreciate the stability of China's political system. His policies also accelerate China's push towards technological independence, and his policies targeting Chinese in academics make many overseas Chinese opt to return to China and contribute their talents to the homeland.
    5
  5948.  @taobaoexpert123  Who determines what is the will of the people? Take the Jan 6 Capitol Hill riots for example, should the American police give in to the demands of those who stormed Capitol Hill?
    5
  5949.  @gregmcdonnell4365  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China.
    5
  5950.  @brucewayne3141  Don't worry, President Xi Jinping is also cracking down on the corruption within the communist party.
    5
  5951.  @ssrae-2229  Precisely. It's the colonial mentality at work here. Even though they are former colonies, the minds of many people still remain colonized and haven't yet undergone decolonization.
    5
  5952.  @b1burck  Outdated or not, this is American taxpayer's money that we are talking about, and it's fallen into Taliban hands, making the organization arguably one of the most well-armed at the moment.
    5
  5953.  @pagan-540  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    5
  5954. Agreed. Just look at the Q-Anon followers who stormed Capitol Hill on January 6th 2021, based on some conspiracy theory posted by some kid in a basement.
    5
  5955.  @ilovemyassam2447  You Indians complain incessantly about your so-called "Pakistan Occupied Kashmir" then why India don't wrest Kashmir from Pakistan then? And look at India having border dispute with Nepal, resulting in Nepalese police open fire and killed 1 Indian near Bihar. Video: 1 Indian killed, 4 injured after Nepal police fired near border area with Bihar youtu.be/SFW4-ViJ0_o
    5
  5956.  @jp95js  Cyrus Janssen promotes the message of "building bridges, not walls" between China and the USA, how is he a sellout to his country when he wants to promote peace and cooperation between USA and China?
    5
  5957.  @MoejiiOsmanTV  About Chinese students studying overseas, China is world's most populous country and its possible that not enough resources, not enough schools, not enough jobs for everyone in China. With such high student population, competition for top schools and higher education in China is fierce and intense. Some students don't qualify for local university, so they may choose to study abroad (especially if their parents have $$$). Some graduates unable to find job in China, so they may seek employment opportunities outside of China. That's why Western schools are positively flooded with Chinese international students, competing with your local students in tests, exams, for university places, and even job offers when they graduate. If they can't find a job in your country, they are always welcome to come back to China (thus saving China the resources needed to train this student to university level) and bringing foreign knowledge and technology to China. If they find a job and remain in your country, then they are depriving a local graduate of a job. If they rise to high position in corporate or government sector, they may get approached by CCP and possibly recruited as a spy in your country. Whichever way you look at it, China wins.
    5
  5958.  @MarkYeung1  So I stand corrected: Trump already made it clear that he was willing to use Meng's arrest as a "bargaining chip" against China for his trade deal, this shows that the U.S. isn't interested in "justice" if they can so easily barter away the detainee. Even the new Biden Administration hasn't so much as uttered a word to Canadian PM Trudeu over what to do with Meng, so more Canadians need to realize that the U.S is just using Meng to deteriorate Canadian-China relations.
    5
  5959.  @Waverlyduli  Cyrus's message has always been about peace and understanding. His videos have the consistent peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" so if you're claiming Cyrus message is the same as the Communist Party of China's, then isn't it a positive message for the world? U.S-China relations have taken a big hit, and deteriorated to their lowest point in decades, and a potential hot war erupting between USA and China would not only be disastrous for both our countries but for the whole world in fact.
    5
  5960.  @RockChatham  You said: "Taiwan controls the world’s microchip production now." Actually, Hong Kong and mainland China export more microchips to the world than Taiwan island. Here's a list of countries/territories by integrated circuit exports. Data is for 2019, in millions of United States dollars, as reported by International Trade Centre. 1. Hong Kong, China (134,483) 2. Mainland China (102,187) 3. Taiwan, China (100,408) 4. South Korea (79,082) 5. Singapore (76,868) 6. Malaysia (44,794) 7. United States (40,099) 8. Japan (27,791) 9. Vietnam (26,084) 10. Philippines (18,991) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by integrated circuit exports
    5
  5961. Taiwan's ability to resist reunification stems from perceived US support. But as mainland China grows and the US declines, their support for Taiwan will evaporate and reunification will be inevitable.
    5
  5962. “American exceptionalism is missionary. It holds that the United States has an obligation to spread its values to every part of the world. China’s exceptionalism is cultural. China does not proselytize or claim that its institutions are relevant outside China.” ― Henry Kissinger, On China
    5
  5963.  @emkoh2746  Zhou Shen (周深) is fantastic indeed. I first heard him on The Voice of China - Zhou Shen sings "Huan Yan" and my mind was blown away by his singing.
    5
  5964. Western Media should be covering news about the ethnic-cleansing of Russians in Ukraine, instead of covering up the REAL genocide.
    5
  5965. 如果中美两国展开贸易战，将造成‘双输’局面，且美国失去的将比获得的更多。
    5
  5966.  @purpleholic1010  Look carefully. Many Asian schools tend to have barbed wire on top of fencing to add security to protect the occupants within.
    5
  5967.  @budgetking2591  According to World Tourism Rankings China is world's 4th most visited country, after France, Spain and the United States seeing some 60.7 million international tourists. Source: World Tourism Rankings wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings China is also the most popular Asian tourist destination, surpassing other Asian destinations like Japan, Korea, India, Thailand, etc.
    5
  5968.  @ebolmao4129  About Chinese investment project, firstly, China runs a business, not a charity drive. Western countries have been pouring donations into African countries, yet they don't solve the problem of poverty in Africa. Whereas China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to many African countries, but we found success through infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc, so China is offering to do the same in African countries to help lift them out of poverty, in exchange for resources. This is done through proper business transactions, not by pointing guns at them like what Westerners been doing to Africa. Thanks to Chinese efforts, African leaders earn legitimacy through Chinese partnerships. They work together with the Chinese to provide Africa with key structural infrastructure fundamentals which will help Africa avoid the "resource curse" (having plenty of resources, but still being poor) Success in this endeavor means avoiding the exploitation of their natural wealth and the beginning of fundamental social and economic transformations on the continent. Video: How Africa is Becoming China's China youtube.com/watch?v=zQV_DKQkT8o
    5
  5969.  @Algerian_Maniac  Firstly, those are schools meant to provide a security environment for students to learn and play as I've been saying. I mean, which "kidnappers" would erect barbed wire fences and spend so much money, time and effort on educating on the kids, all the while facing international condemnation from rest of the world? Secondly, kidnapping is serious problem in China and around 70,000 children are kidnapped and sold on the black market every year. With such high risk of kidnapping and child trafficking in China, what's wrong with installing additional security measures like barbed wire along our schools?
    5
  5970.  @commiewolfeee8437  Surveillance cameras are only useful to review the crime after it has been committed. The barbed wire serves as a deterrent against possible trespassing or kidnappers.
    5
  5971.  Charles Schmidd  Canada started this whole hostage diplomacy mess, they know exactly how to end this stalemate.
    5
  5972.  Charles Schmidd  About tourism in China, as of 2015, China is the world's 4th most visited country, after France, United States, and Spain, with 62.9 million international visitors in 2018 according to World Tourism Rankings Countries by International tourist arrivals (2018) 1. France (89.4 million) 2. Spain (82.8 million) 3. United States (79.7 million) 4. China (62.9 million) 5. Italy (61.6 million) … So what makes you think people are insane for setting foot in China? Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself?
    5
  5973.  @basedbro2578  If you claim Taiwan is an independent country, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations? Is there some force preventing Taiwan from joining the UN as an independent country can?
    5
  5974.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "Why not asking the Chinese people?" According to a long-term survey by Harvard University and Ash Center, around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Chinese government. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    5
  5975.  @jacwi8719  "Stupid" Yeah, it's stupid to think liking a comment has anything to do with wumao. You think Wumao are paid for liking comments?
    5
  5976.  Conan  China admitted that Covid-19 did not originate in Wuhan seafood market. Source: Coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, Chinese scientists say scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3051981/coronavirus-did-not-originate-wuhan-seafood-market-chinese Analysis of genomic data from 93 samples of the novel coronavirus suggests it was imported from elsewhere
    5
  5977.  u wot  "Do Americans need VPN to access uncensored social media websites?" If they're in China, then yes. But Chinese can use VPN too, so what's the big deal? Besides, using VPN confers several benefits as well, such as changing IP addresses, increased privacy and security (hackers can't get to you so easily) and sometimes, even bargains from travel websites. "Can Chinese say whatever they want about the CCP without fear? Can Chinese conduct protests against the government without fear of having their family kidnapped?" Are you kidding? China sees on average some 500 protests daily according to studies. In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010 (or an average of 493 protests daily) Source: Wikipedia: Protest and dissent in China Do I get a prize for answering your questions?
    5
  5978.  @renebarrow.lifeinthelight  About the stereotypes of mainladers being loud and boisterous, that's just part of Chinese culture. Many Hong Kongers tend to speak Cantonese loudly themselves. At times, it almost sounds like they are arguing in Cantonese (when they are not). It's because Hong Kong is a densely populated region and the people there have to shout to be heard over the city noise. It's the same with many mainland Chinese cities being crowded.
    5
  5979. Beijing always welcome New Delhi to come onboard the Belt and Road Initiative to share in mutual progress and prosperity and make Asia strong again. China plans to make Asia strong, by building infrastructure in less developed countries like Pakistan, Kazakhstan, other -stan countries, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal and Maldives. But India often sees this as part of its "String of Pearls Strategy" but then, how else is Asia going to become strong if infrastructure isn't being built in these countries?
    5
  5980. @Gatlin Grove Prior to Hong Kong handover back to mainland China in 1997, Hong Kong was under British colonial rule from 1841-1997 and the 1956 HK riots resulted in 59 deaths while the 1967 HK riots resulted in 51 deaths. Yet after the handover, the 2019 HK riots resulted in zero deaths thus far so aren't the Hong Kong Police showing remarkable restraint?
    5
  5981. China has hatched many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, to chart the China's course towards the future. Our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom in 2030, 2040, 2050. Whereas American Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years so they can only plan short-term, instead of long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more.
    5
  5982.  @petersinclair3997  Ancient civilizations have similarly benefited from Chinese inventions such as the Four Great Inventions (四大发明). Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation in bad weather conditions possible, without the Sun/stars. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought.
    5
  5983.  @michaelkatz275  A second Gazprom turbine needed repairs and was sent to Canada, but it wasn't returned. Also, Russia is willing to open Nord Stream 2 to supply gas to Germany, but Germany refused. And Germany is literally switching off spotlights at night to save energy. Germany industrial companies are closing due to energy shortages, and German citizens are being encouraged to take shorter hot showers, so who is faltering here?
    5
  5984.  @cchannel7857  Cyrus has stated in his email that he's been very busy lately. It's not uncommon among business practices for payment details to be worked out at a later date after the initial business proposal, so what exactly are you trying to say? The end goal is that Cyrus declined payment in the end.
    5
  5985.  @宋庆-i4m  You said: "Being a Japanese company and introducing your product on 7/7 -- Same day as the Marco Polo bridge incident (had nothing to do with the Communist because they weren't in charge of China at the time)" Marco Polo Bridge Incident was when Japan invaded Manchuria at the start of the Second Sino-Japanese War, but even though the communists had nothing to do with it according to you, the Chinese communists are still Chinese too isn't it? So even if they aren't communists, they still felt something as Chinese citizens after all. You said: "A Japanese adult actress wearing traditional Chinese clothing while showing cleavage. This is sexualizing Chinese women (she's Japanese but it doesn't matter) but it is somehow okay for Chinese women wearing Western clothing in a sexual manner." That's the political correctness culture of the West, where Social Justice Warriors can accuse people of "cultural misappropriation" (like that Western girl who was chastised for wearing a Chinese qipao to her prom). You said earlier that there are plenty of people in China that support western ideas and values, so is this here one of your example of political correctness culture that is predominant in the West? In Chinese, these sort of SJW behavior are often called baizuo (白左 "White Left")
    5
  5986.  @宋庆-i4m  Firstly, your coach example is conjured out of nowhere. I never actually talked to any coach or made any promises to go undefeated, its just you being a sore loser and quoting a hypothetical example with me in it. Secondly, there's clearly logic in the coaches example. Forfeiting every match doesn't count as a loss, so technically the team is undefeated. Just like if the team fought 1 match and win 1 match, that also means that the team is undefeated. How can you not see the logic behind this? Explain how is forfeiting all matches not considered undefeated?
    5
  5987.  @宋庆-i4m  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. So to answer your question, you can get married to the same sex in China, all you have to do is register your same-sex marriage in Taipei that's all.
    5
  5988.  @宋庆-i4m  What has PRC 🇨🇳 administrating/in charge of Taiwan even got to do with the fact that Taiwan is part of China according to their constitution? If you read the Taiwan's Republic of China 🇹🇼 constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China, so the fact is that yes, you can get married to someone of the same sex as you, you'll just have to register your same-sex marriage in Taipei that's all. Thus, I have already answered your question that yes, you can get married to a person of the same sex in China.
    5
  5989.  @eddiecheang1513  Agree with what you said. This scenario is reminisce of the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, where Soviet missiles were deployed to Cuba, and it was perceived as an existential threat to United States. Many applauded President Kennedy for his refusal to back down, and eventually the Soviet missiles were withdrawn. Fast forward till today, and Ukraine joining NATO would allow NATO missiles and troops to be deployed right outside Russia's doorstep and Russia sees it as an existential threat, just as USA did with the Cuban missiles.
    5
  5990.  @gtengineer1967  Some people can see through Western anti-China propaganda, but they still fall for anti-Russia propaganda. Others are the reverse, they see through Western anti-Russia propaganda, but still fall for anti-China propaganda. Brian is a rare individual that has the ability to see through both the anti-China and anti-Russia propaganda.
    5
  5991.  @ryanshiflett2178  That's because mask-wearing was literally introduced into the West, after watching the success of Eastern countries wearing masks. It wasn't common sense like you said, it had to be learned. And I did not say all Westerners did not wear masks, I'm saying that in Western culture, it's taken as a sign of being selfish to wear a mask, because it's seen as being selfish, like you're protecting yourself from catching other people's flu. Whereas in Eastern culture, wearing a mask is seen as being polite, that you're protecting others from catching your flu.
    5
  5992.  @eddyfong6486  Ukraine has been shelling and killing ethnic Russians in Donbass region, and over the course of 8 years, over 14,000 civilians have been killed in the Donbas region, and this documentary chronicles of lives of ethnic Russians living in Donbas. Video: Donbass: The Grey Zone. Life in the frontline villages youtu.be/Kc7P6j6og4k
    5
  5993. @Niggur george floyed China has settled boundary dispute approximately of 20,000 km with 12 countries out of the 22,000 km and is yet to settle about 2,000 km of boundary involving India and Bhutan. -In 1961, Nepal and China signed border agreement. -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1991, USSR and China signed Sino-Soviet border agreement. -In 1992, Laos and China signed border agreement. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border agreement. -In 2011, Tajikistan ratified a 1999 deal to cede 1,000 km2 of land to China and China also cede over 28,000 km2 of Tajikistani territory. China has 21 talks with Bhutan and 19 talks with India but still fail to settle our countries borders. So its not for a lack of trying.
    5
  5994.  @paul-hh9oc  From what I understand, Singapore is host to some American military bases (US carrier battlegroups use Singapore base as starting point for their patrols) so how exactly will Chinese government make use of Singapore to destroy Americans, Australians and New Zealand?
    5
  5995.  oneviwatara  Could you define what is Sino people? Because the vast majority of overseas Chinese are Han Chinese. Overseas Chinese wikipedia.org/wiki/Overseas_Chinese
    5
  5996.  @solid1378   Why is it suddenly my work? Who made the declaration that "Sanskrit is the oldest written language" and yet failed to provide evidence to support it?
    5
  5997.  @Kitchguy  You said: "I said if a leader of a Country is killing its people or threatening others etc the US will intervene on behalf of the public." Then why'd the United States ignore the Saudi Arabian Crown Prince killing of a reporter (Khashoggi)?
    5
  5998.  @nellyfrittata8319  Approximately 19 million Americans still lack access to fixed broadband Internet service at threshold speeds. In rural areas, nearly a quarter of the population (14.5 million) lack access to Internet, and in tribal areas, it's nearly one third. Even in areas where broadband is available, approximately 100 million Americans still do not subscribe to it.
    5
  5999. +Sam Shyam How would you know whether Donald Trump won't kill 60 million of his own people in the future? He's still alive and he's the POTUS and capable of launching a war at the push of a button.
    5
  6000. @michaelngan99 China was never fully colonised. Parts of China yes, such as Hong Kong which became a British colony in the 19th century. As a result, coloniality remains present in the minds of (some) people in Hong Kong, even till today. Whereas India was fully colonised by the British and even after the British left, many in India still retain the colonial mindset.
    5
  6001.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Do you know a country that sanction Australian wine and lobster." Can't be China, because Australian winemakers shipped $9 million of Australian wines to China last year.
    5
  6002.  @designqq8905  Agreed. Outwardly, USA expressed support for Japan releasing irradiated Fukushima waters. But inwardly, USA has maintained a ban on imports of farming and seafood products from the region near Fukushima. Yet JaYoe Nation thinks Asian countries are just being racist against Japanese? The real two-faced racist is the country expressing support for Japan, yet continuing to ban seafood imports from Fukushima region.
    5
  6003.  @BrokeCanadian  Western media said "North Korean leader Kim Jung-un is dead", yet he's still alive and kicking so what makes you think Jack Ma is dead?
    5
  6004.  @blaisetzu  China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia has since succumbed to history. China has many historical monuments like The Great Wall of China, The Forbidden City, Terracotta Army, The First Emperor of China's Tomb, The Grand Canal (world's longest artificial waterway) and so much more. In fact, according to UNESCO, China ranks 2nd in the world in number of world heritage sites just behind Italy at number one.
    5
  6005.  @Winters777  It's written in black and white in the 1898 Treaty of Paris, how is it a lie? Philippines maritime boundaries are drawn and they do not include the South China Sea as within Philippine territory.
    5
  6006.  @el-_-grando-_-_-scabandri  "Which one? GPT-4 have many versions, and if you read their papers you'll see they benchmark their models against early ones of it." Looks like you've already read the papers, then why are you asking which ones? The fact remains that Baidu’s Ernie 4 AI model, one of China’s leading large language models (LLMs), has outperformed similar technologies from US peers in generating Chinese texts such as those in the style of Imperial Chinese poetry.
    5
  6007.  @el-_-grando-_-_-scabandri  You said: "Look ... early days or even 4 months ago of GPT 4 is considered stone age in this field. is all Chinese corps can do is play catch me with OpenAI and such?" Since you've acknowledged that this field is an ongoing process of development, then what's the point of comparing just months of development? China's technological advancement is developing at its own rate. Like in the 5G field for example, China is already coming up with 6G technology.
    5
  6008. At 3:36 Guangzhou officials even apologise for his quarantine and brought gifts like noodles, milk, face masks and sanitises so he seems okay with it. But the video deliberately distort his face and mask his voice so it make it sound like he's ungrateful, when he's actually rather chill.
    5
  6009.  @kennedy6618  Evaporation does create rain that's true. But isn't the rainwater itself sourced from the evaporated water?
    5
  6010. I don't think you understand that most Chinese aren't against Japanese because of racism, they are against the Japanese government doing the irresponsible act of dumping irradiated waters into the sea. But you know that the USA supports Japan releasing the irradiated floodwaters, Anthony Blinken said so. Yet US still maintain their ban on imports of farming and seafood products from the region near Fukushima.
    5
  6011. ​ @ben10094 Yeah, rather than stay behind in USA and pay 100%+ more for everything
    5
  6012.  @SargonofQueens  You graduated from Harvard University? Have you heard about a long term study by Harvard University revealing that estimated 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China? A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. Source: Harvard survey finds Chinese satisfaction with govt rises china.org.cn/china/2020-07/17/content_76281590.htm
    5
  6013.  @SargonofQueens  I gave you a survey, by your alma mater, Harvard University, revealing that 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China, yet you're calling your alma mater fake news?
    5
  6014.  @SargonofQueens  If you don't care about China's interests, then why do you care about China being under communist party rule, when majority of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China?
    5
  6015.  @SargonofQueens  Because it's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are set and many economists believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's someday in the foreseeable future. China is going to play bigger, more prominent role in people's lives in the future, whether you like it or not.
    5
  6016. That's why the solar power plant is situated in the desert where there is no snow or hail.
    5
  6017. +Gregor Jerman You said so yourself, the Imperial Family is ceremonial in nature and does not participate in politics. Why keep an Imperial family but not an Imperial system? And Mandarin Chinese is the world's most spoken language today, whereas other ancient language like Cuneiform, Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are 'dead' languages, and there aren't natives who speak the language today. Chinese civilization is 5000 years old and too expansive to be wiped out by any single man, government or revolution. The Mongols and Manchus tried to destroy Han Chinese culture, but ended up assimilating into it. According to UNESCO, China ranks 2nd in the world in number of UNESCO Heritage Sites, only behind Italy at number one. Ranking of countries by number of UNESCO Heritage Sites. 1. Italy (54) *2. China (53*) <- China is ranked 2nd in the world 3. Spain (47) 4. France (44) 5. Germany (44) ... ... 13. Japan (22) ... Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Heritage_site#Countries_with_ten_or_more_sites So whichever country you happen to hail from, unless you are Italian, then China has more World Heritage Sites than even your country. China still has the Great Wall of China, the Forbidden City, the Grand Canal (World's oldest canal or longest artificial river) Qin Shihuangdi's Tomb, Terracotta Warriors, and many more sites.
    5
  6018. DPP is hyping hatred against mainlanders, and extremely hostile to the people who support reunification, and the persecution and stigmatization won't stop.
    5
  6019.  @Cl0ckcl0ck  I've played checkers before (but not at the top) it's always seem to be more about planning each move step by step, rather than thinking far ahead by several moves. Also, the goal of checkers is to clear the board of all opponent pieces (i.e wipe out the enemy completely) whereas the goal of chess is to corner your opponent's King and checkmate him (i.e going after the leader). The goals of checkers and chess seem to fit USA's and Russia's goals respectively
    5
  6020.  @flickingbollocks5542  You said: "Is a President for life democratic?" Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel had served 4 terms (16 years) in office and would have probably served a 5th term (and possibly for life) had she not voluntarily choose not to run for the next election. Yet many people agree that Germany is a democracy, so what's wrong with a president for life then?
    5
  6021.  @KrunoslavStifter  Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine, which was caused by a number of factors, including bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because his goal was to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    5
  6022.  @KrunoslavStifter  You said: "He won the civil war, but it was far from his doing." During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage; they were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were inferior, and they had far fewer numbers (only 50 communist members in 1921) over the Nationalist Kuomintang. The KMT on the other hand, had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training, and far superior numbers over the the communists. Securing victory against the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT. Yet despite the odds, the communists survived all KMT attempts to wipe them out, employing strategies like "Long March" (长征) and despite KMT's initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan). If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, as well as cementing the communists right to rule China. If you truly know about the democracy you speak about, then Mao Zedong clearly had the support of the people of mainland China. As for Tibet, the Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Source: Wikipedia: Seventeen Point Agreement So there is this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Even today, countries all over the world recognise the Tibet Autonomous Region as part of the People's Republic of China, because they include Tibet in maps of China.
    5
  6023. In the past, China suffered from "brain drain", but with China's rise and the Sinophobia in the U.S, China is now experiencing a "reverse brain drain" as overseas Chinese return to the mainland for better economic opportunities.
    5
  6024. Maybe one day in the future, when China's lunar mining base is established, President Xi Jinping himself might travel to the Moon to inspect the colony. Who knows?
    5
  6025.  @dagsmoko3889  Except for chartered flights, no international passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since its lockdown on January 23, People's Daily learned exclusively from the Hubei Airport Group Company Source: No international commercial passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since lockdown: Airport authority news.cgtn.com/news/2020-07-11/No-international-passenger-flights-departed-from-Wuhan-since-lockdown-S2T0tDumyc/index.html
    5
  6026. Russia will never stop, so how about Ukraine?
    5
  6027. @Teringventje China has huge repertoire of movies from different eras and genres to draw upon. Historical Period, Chinese Martial Arts Movies, Chinese Mythology, Ancient Wartime Movies, Sino-Japanese Wartime Movies, Chinese Detective Movies, and even Futuristic Scientific Fiction movies, like Wandering Earth 流浪地球
    5
  6028.  @danharold3087  If China's loans are at 2x the going rate, then why do developing countries choose to borrow from Chinese banks then, if the terms are unfavorable towards them? China doesn't force those countries to borrow from our banks, but if they choose to do so, Chinese banks will gladly dispense those loans. As for infrastructure projects involving Chinese labor, you should know that not just anybody can build roads, railways, highways, bridges, etc. Chinese workers are arguably the most experienced in building infrastructure (and also usually the cheapest) so Chinese workers are employed to build those infrastructure projects.
    5
  6029. ​ @MarkYeung1  Of all the places that Hong Konger diaspora settled in, mainland China holds the largest number of Hong Kong expatriates, outside of Hong Kong. Also, Hong Kong has the highest property prices in the world. The high cost of housing is one reason why many young Hong Kong couples left Hong Kong, because they are unable to afford an apartment. Therefore, falling property prices actually benefit the Hong Kong people seeking to buy an apartment and settle down in Hong Kong.
    5
  6030.  @xxxcool2565  Ukraine has been supporting ultra-nationalists and neo-Nazis like the Azov Battalion in their genocide of ethnic Russians in the Donbas region. 8 years of shelling in the Donbas (by both sides) have resulted in the deaths of some 13,000 civilians (UN estimates). Russia is not starting a war, it's ending one that started since the 2014 coup d'etat of Ukraine's government by USA and NATO.
    5
  6031.  @xxxcool2565  In the rest of the so-called "free" world, a village chief like the United States can marry so many wives (i.e NATO) and influence them to do his every bidding? Even if you permit this, the village chief and his many wives have no intention to marry Ukraine into their family, yet they still offer words of encouragement but refuse to partake in the fighting. Didn't you hear president Zelensky lament that Ukraine has been abandoned by the West?
    5
  6032.  @ColoniaMurder20  You said: "India is home of huge no. of temples in this world." According to UNESCO, China ranks the world's 2nd in number of World Heritage Sites, just behind Italy at number one. As of 2023, China is home to 57 world heritage sites compared to India in 5th place with 42 world heritage sites. ... (Source: UNESCO World Heritage Site)
    5
  6033.  @ColoniaMurder20  If you really want to know who has been killing the people of the Philippines, simply look up the Philippine-American War, which lasted 3 years and resulted in the death of over 20,000 Filipino combatants. As many as 200,000 Filipino civilians died from violence, famine, and disease. In the end, the Philippines lost the war and became an American colony. With you having a name like yours, shouldn't you already know who committed the real colonial murder?
    5
  6034.  Russo21 Zir  China does not want our land to be bought up by foreigners, that's why the government prohibits foreign ownership of Chinese land.
    5
  6035.  @nigelliam153  Why did the Philippine Coastguard (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) shot and killed a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng (洪石成)? On the other hand, which Chinese coastguard shot at Filipino fisherman? Answer: None!
    5
  6036. +Craine Big Brother What about Korean "comfort" women? Japanese textbooks recorded Korean comfort women as "well paid" government prostitutes, even when many of them were forced to service Japanese soldiers in Japanese occupied territories. Many of the victims (now in their late 80-90s) are protesting outside the Japanese embassy.
    5
  6037. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country since 1979, whereas USA been involved in 21st century wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, etc and cutting off those country's heads (Muammar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, etc) and then installing their own US puppet in place. Now President Trump is targeting Syria, and the Assad Regime is next on the list.
    5
  6038.  @zackk4969  You said: "The world's biggest problem is Chiina" China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    5
  6039. Did your grandparents told you which side Romania and also Ukraine fought on during WWII?
    5
  6040.  @douglasman2011  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA. The test is given every three years to 15-year-olds around the world and measures their knowledge in reading, science and mathematics. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    5
  6041.  @zilun  Do you have evidence of CPC donating to WHO representatives' personal bank account?
    5
  6042.  @None-do2qn  I already shown that China literally has more mosques than France, America and Great Britain, what more needs to be said? Even ambassadors from 50 countries voice support to China's position on Xinjiang issues. Video: Ambassadors from 50 countries voice support to China's position on Xinjiang issues youtu.be/lhwBnn-Qm-Q Ambassadors from 50 countries to the UN at Geneva (UNOG) have co-signed a letter to the president of the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) and the High Commissioner for Human Rights to voice their support for China's position on issues related to its Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.
    5
  6043.  @alanliu6848  China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020, China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them.
    5
  6044.  @Andy-P  According to US CDC, blood samples from residents in nine states between Dec. 13 and Jan. 17 were analysed and found evidence of Covid-19 antibodies in 106 out of 7,389 samples. This implies that the coronavirus was in USA for at least a month (for Covid-19 antibodies to develop) before the first case was reported. Video: USA Today: COVID-19 may have been spreading in the US at least a month before first case was reported, CDC study says usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/12/01/covid-cdc-study-says-virus-us-weeks-before-first-case-reported/6475864002/
    5
  6045.  @Andy-P  What makes you think USA will go to war with mainland China over Taiwan? When Russia had military intervention in Crimea and annexed it from Ukraine, all Washington did was slap sanctions on Moscow that's all. No US-Russia war. So why would USA want to go to war with mainland China over the island of Taiwan? What does Taiwan offer to USA that makes them willing to go to war for them?
    5
  6046.  @Andy-P  The Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (national language of China) Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth and they learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America. In Xinjiang, the Uighur language is written on the street signs, shop signs, restaurant menus, etc so what's wrong with how China treats non-Han?
    5
  6047. Japan has a long history of invading China and Korea. Even in 1592, Japanese forces led by Toyotomi Hideyoshi invaded Korea with the intent of conquest, and after hearing of the invasion, the Ming emperor dispatched Chinese troops to Korea (Joseon Dynasty) to aid the Koreans in repelling the invaders. Then we have the 1st Sino-Japanese war in 1894, when Japan invaded Korea again and Qing dynasty China, capturing Korea and Taiwan, and ruling over Korea for 25 years and Taiwan for 50 years. Next we have 2nd Sino-Japanese war here, in 1931, where Japan invaded China and South East Asian countries like Philippines, Singapore, etc. So who can rightly say that Japan won't invade China, Korea, or other countries in the future, given that for the past 300-400 years, Japan made numerous incursions into other countries for the express purpose of conquest, given this historical trend? Chinese never set foot on Japanese at all (Mongolians tried but failed) because Japan is low in resources, whereas China is rich in resources, which is why Japan made numerous advances into China throughout history.
    5
  6048. It also helps that alternative sources and markets exist for the sanctioned countries to turn to.
    5
  6049.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "神州 Shenzhou We know how much the government in China listened to the demand for democracy for the Hong Kong people and made changes. Hong Kong is part of China." Previously while Hong Kong was part of Britain, the people of Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong. So the government in China made changes to allow for a One Country, Two Systems policy, which meant that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favorite leaders. As a result, Hong Kong held more elections AFTER the 1997 handover, than they ever did for 150 years as a British colony.
    5
  6050. The American Dream is about individualistic accomplishments, where it's every individual for themselves. On the other hand, the Chinese Dream is about the rejuvenation of the Chinese civilization as a whole, where it's about collective accomplishments.
    5
  6051. "I think people need to separate the US government from ordinary Americans," But don't ordinary Americans vote to elect their U.S government? The U.S government is in power because of the majority of Americans that voted for them in the last election, so by this logic, shouldn't your feelings towards the U.S government also apply to the ordinary Americans?
    5
  6052.  @night6724  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    5
  6053.  @jtf873  Under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Life Expectancy in China nearly doubled from 35-40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 and is is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history.
    5
  6054.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou yes. CGTN often criticise democracy." Could you point out a video where CGTN criticize democracy (the ideology itself)? I searched "CGTN Democracy" and their videos pointed out that some of the so-called Western democracies no longer appear to be democracies. Instead of being a democracy of the people, by the people, for the people, these Western democracies have mutated into plutocracies of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%, that's all, and that some countries are even exporting war to other countries, under the veil of democracy.
    5
  6055.  @intothewrx  Previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under the authoritarian rule of colonial Britain, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong, while it was a British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    5
  6056. Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why they continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    5
  6057. ​ @bens8013  You said: "Ukraine has only crossed the russian border with aerial weapons that are targeted at military targets" How are the Ukraine drone attacks on Moscow considered military targets, given that the drones flew over and targeted residential buildings? Also, does the bombing of the Crimean Bridge (a civilian infrastructure) qualify as a military target?
    5
  6058. +Rick Sanchez So Vietnamese should stop using fire, since their villages were torched by Americans and napalm bombs dropped on them. Every technology has the potential for beneficial use and for abuse.
    5
  6059.  @Finnbearl61r  "Shenzhou. “helped”= abducted" Russia has returned Ukrainian kids to their parents. The kids had been staying with their relatives in Russia.
    5
  6060.  HellBlazerMNE07  "Yeah another pathetic dictator is a blessing apparently." Putin recently announced his candidacy in the 2024 Russian Presidential election are you sure he's a dictator?
    5
  6061.  @shambhutekar5797  China only owns about 10% of Sri Lanka's foreign debt. The remaining 90% of Sri Lanak's foreign debt is owned by the West, Japan and India. Here's the breakdown of Sri Lanka's debt -Market borrowings (47%) -Asian Development Bank (13%) -Japan (10%) -China (10%) -World Bank (9%) -India (2%) -Other (9%) ... Source: Department of External Resources, Sri Lanka. Yet you claim China is responsible for Sri Lanka's crisis when Chinese debt only makes up 10%?
    5
  6062.  @ColoniaMurder20  Just because they look like Austronesian, doesn't mean that they are the same as Indonesians, Malaysians and Filipinos. The Austronesian expansion outward of Southern China happened around 1500-1000 BC, whereas Han Dynasty only came about around 200 BC, yet you claim both occurred at the same time? And since you acknowledge Austronesian extensive colonization of South East Asian countries, then you have no right to point fingers at Han (who's conquest were limited by land) when Austronesia's was far more widespread. The indigenous people living in Indonesia, Philippines and Malaysia have since been colonized and replaced by Austronesians.
    5
  6063. Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them, which we didn't want, because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken and made into British colony to act as drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even after Britain renounced ownership over its former colonies, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, instead China had to sign Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    5
  6064.  @MarkYeung1  Canada has been following the United States in sending military aid to Ukraine and prolonging the war unnecessarily. Whereas China put forth a 12-point peace plan to bring a peaceful resolution to the conflict in Ukraine, and Putin has welcomed the move, while the U.S opposes the plan.
    5
  6065.  @Tespri  You said: "Meanwhile China actually is advocate of colonialism and has been doing that in Africa for a while." Which African country has become a Chinese colony, you tell me? China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, etc in many African countries, but China is not making them into colonies of China.
    5
  6066.  @xerozero976  You said 744,000 people were displaced, and 63.46 million were affected, but where did you get your bloated figure of 53 million homeless? You clearly said 53million homeless, so where does it say that the people affected are homeless, you tell me?
    5
  6067.  @xerozero976  Look at former President Trump signing away 100 Presidential Pardons on his last day, how's that not considered a form of corruption? Source: President Donald Trump Issues Over 100 Pardons And Commutations On Final Day In Office pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2021/01/20/president-trump-issues-pardons/
    5
  6068. Switch off the air conditioner in Hong Kong Airport, and see how long these spoilt Hong Kong youngsters can remain in the airport.
    5
  6069.  @ChillDfect  If it were really because of the 结对认亲 policy, then the offspring of such couples should contribute to the Han population. But instead, it's the population of Uighurs that have grown over the years.
    5
  6070.  @kus4kus4  Coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, Chinese scientists say analysis of genomic data from 93 samples of the novel coronavirus suggests it was imported from elsewhere. Source: Coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3051981/coronavirus-did-not-originate-wuhan-seafood-market-chinese
    5
  6071. Many expats in China have remarked that returning to their home countries often feel as though they travelled back in time.
    5
  6072.  @davidlazarus67 Indeed, I was astonished to learn the fact that adult literacy rate in USA is 79% while China's adult literacy rate is 99.8%
    5
  6073. @Al Castel Taken from the above source: France will send radicalised Islamists to re-education centres under a €40 million plan to tackle extremism, which the prime minister says is the biggest threat to the nation since Hitler. The suspects will be taught their patriotic duties and forced to undergo psychological treatment in an attempt to counter jihadist indoctrination. I mean, you're okay with Westerners doing this, then why can't China do the same? Why the biased double standards?
    5
  6074. I heard it is 50-50 joint venture between China and Singapore, so does Singapore get to have a say in its direction?
    5
  6075.  @CyrusJanssen  Yes, that's the way to do it, by contacting people on the ground in China to describe what the situation is like. I know of some YouTubers (i.e serpentza and c-milk) whom are no longer in China yet they don't bother asking their former contacts in China (if they have any) about the situation in China, before giving their take on the issue.
    5
  6076. China also publishes more books than any other in the world, this implies Mandarin Chinese language is going to play an important role in the future. Countries by books published 1. China (440,000 books) 2. United States (304,912 books) 3. United Kingdom (184,000 books) 4. Japan (139,078 books) 5. Russia (101,981 books) 6. Germany (93,600 books) ... Source: Books published per country per year wikipedia.org/wiki/Books_published_per_country_per_year#List_of_countries
    5
  6077. They got the Western MSM on their side, covering up for their crimes.
    5
  6078.  @jayztv3345  Rules-based international law? The Philippines government deliberately ran aground a ship (BRP Sierra Madre) on to the Second Thomas shoal, and then started to claim the shoal as part of Philippine territory, how's this the Rules-Base international law?
    5
  6079.  @europademon  You said "I have no sympathy for traitors who support genocidal regimes." That means you don't support the genocidal USA right? They're killing Muslims in the Middle East right now.
    5
  6080.  @reddirtmillennial2011  You said: "We hate the Chinese Communist Party. Not the Chinese culture, I love the three kingdoms lore." If you love the Three Kingdoms fighting to reunify China, that means you support the reunification of Taiwan with the mainland after all, isn't it?
    5
  6081.  @viralanimatedphotos4463  Eileen Gu paid for her training in the USA, then how are those resources wasted? And talking about terrorist countries, your referring to the USA right? After the US drone strike in Kabul, killing 10 Afghan citizens (including women and children) and the U.S General responsible for ordering the drone attack did not violate any law according to the Pentagon.
    5
  6082.  @MarkYeung1  Taiwan used to be one of Four Asian Tigers but since democracy was introduced to Taiwan, it's economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving for jobs in the mainland or Singapore Video: How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents | Insight | CNA Insider youtu.be/P3BCnPb8qHY?t=110 "From the '90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreements on policy matters. This produced less effective policy making. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be more conservative in Taiwan, so they do not enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou, Research Fellow, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica
    5
  6083.  @MarkYeung1  Those people starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like the 1958 Yellow River flood, then how can you claim Chairman Mao is a mass murderer when those people starved?
    5
  6084.  @MarkYeung1  The Hong Kong Extradition Bill was proposed because of a Hong Kong guy named Chan, who brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, and stuff her body in her suitcase, before flying back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice for his crime, but Hong Kong has no extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to Hong Kong extradition laws. Do the HK protestors even know what they are protesting for? Have they read the bill and understood its contents in their entirety?
    5
  6085. India's biggest obstacle is its mindset. Many Indians (but not all) still retain the colonial mentality of worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture.
    5
  6086.  @Resdim  You people aren't even interested in listening to the real story by the OP, explaining that the fight was between 2 police forces from 2 provinces. You're only interested in hearing what you want to hear, like "rebelling against the government."
    5
  6087.  @wiz2387  Why can't Chinese eat dogs? It's legal to eat dogmeat in 44 States in America and yes it does happen on occasion in USA. Source: Man bites dog? It's legal to eat dogs and cats in 44 states consumeraffairs.com/news/man-bites-dog-its-legal-to-eat-dogs-and-cats-in-44-states-101714.html Source: It’s Still Legal To Eat Dogs In The United States–And Yes, It Happens dogtime.com/advocacy/49933-still-legal-eat-dogs-united-states-yes-happens
    5
  6088. Russia also has time on her side. The unipolar world is dying while the multipolar world is being born.
    5
  6089. ​ @DerekYoung1  They've been saying that about China since 3 decades ago. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    5
  6090.  @williamtell5365  You're an educated foreigner, and I respect that. But I myself am an educated Chinese, many of my peers received an education, some were even educated abroad, and have returned to contribute our knowledge to China. So if anything, it seems like the differences between an educated foreigner and an overseas educated Chinese are diminishing. Or perhaps you happen to look down on Chinese receiving education abroad, and becoming perhaps just as qualified as you in China? About China's turn towards repression of minorities, as far as I know, ethnic minorities in China enjoy special privileges over Han, such as tax exemptions, priority in healthcare, free education for up to 15 years (9 years for Han), government bursaries, and advantages in higher education acceptance. For example, if a Han candidate needs say 600 points to qualify for a particular University course, then an ethnic minority candidate needs only say 300 points (easier to qualify) for the exact same university course.
    5
  6091.  @arminius6506  Agreed. Just like when mobile phones first came out, they were expensive, oftentimes out of the price range for ordinary folk to afford. But when Apple moved to China and set up shop here, prices of mobile phones gradually became cheaper and more affordable to the masses. The proliferation of smartphones helped more people to gain access to the Internet and nowadays, virtually everyone has a smartphone because it has grown more affordable.
    5
  6092. I searched up "Europe's Poorest Country" online, and found that Ukraine frequently pops up in the results.
    5
  6093. Agreed. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    5
  6094.  @JD-yz4kr  Well said. China has a long history of famines that occur periodically, with the Great Chinese Famine being the last widespread famine suffered by China. And there has been no other famines since. There's a lot of reading materials out there if only people would read up on China's prior history of famines. YouTuber Nathan Rich made an effort to point it out in his "Epic China" series.
    5
  6095.  @COCO-bl4ig  Yes. I'm disappointed that mansana appeared to be on attack mode, hurling insults one after another, rather than engage in productive dialogue.
    5
  6096.  @dagsmoko3889  Back then, USA accuse mainland China of potentially abusing the Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now scrapped). Now the USA turn around and abuse their own extradition bill with Canada with Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou. The USA accuse others of doing things that they themselves have done. The sheer irony!
    5
  6097.  @bigboss337  You said: "So, you till cannot call RoC rebellous and separatists. Now, I understand better :D" Rebellious: means disagreement and resisting convention. The majority of UN countries voted to kick Taiwan out and to recognize PRC as China, yet Taiwan still insists that it's China, so isn't that being rebellious? Separatists: means that you consider your state as a separate country altogether, and there are some separatists forces in Taiwan seeking to do exactly that. How is it wrong to call them separatists? It's not mainland China that wants separation here.
    5
  6098. Russia's hypersonic missile together with it's 30 cruise missiles bombing Yavoriv is sending a message to NATO that they know of NATO's activities and Russia has the capabilities to counter it.
    5
  6099.  @teresabaker-carl9668  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    5
  6100.  @doctrui  Firstly, you choose to take the loan, and if you understood the conditions of the loan and agree to it then yes it's doing business. The loan could have helped you save someone's life or lift yourself out of poverty and so. Secondly, I've never heard of a "loan shark" that personally come over and construct roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, etc, and make your house better to live in.
    5
  6101.  @namelesssnitchy  About capital punishment in China, sustaining a huge prison population represents a significant drain on the country's resources in upkeep and maintenance of prisons. Furthermore, the released prisoners often have difficulty re-adjusting back to ordinary civilian life and some return to a life of crime and wound up behind bars. Because to them, life behind prison is better than life outside. This is the problem that huge prison population countries like America are facing. Through capital punishment, China is freeing up resources that would have been spent on upkeep of prisoners and utilising those resources elsewhere. I mean, prison shouldn't be fun, it should be feared so that it acts as a deterrent to committing crimes. Capital punishment is the ultimate deterrent, that's why crime rates are lower in China than in the USA. You don't want potential criminals to commit crimes, thinking they can get away with it by being imprisoned that's all, that's why China has capital punishment.
    5
  6102.  @nicolasbouyiouclis4726  The link is still up. It's here on Brian's video. Search for the following words: "WARNING: EXTREMELY GRAPHIC" on this page in the video description, and then click the blue hyperlink that appears below this phrase.
    5
  6103.  @htlow3598  Agreed. It should have been: "If only the USA was willing to cooperate with China...."
    5
  6104. The Russians actually inflicted the most damage to Nazi forces during WWII. The Russians also suffered the most casualties of WWII, even more than Chinese.
    5
  6105.  @ammarhaziq919  China has informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia-like illness on 31st December 2019. By 5th Jan 2020, China had isolated the novel coronavirus strain out of billions in record time, and by 12th Jan, China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with the WHO. And which doctors or whistleblowers did China kill and jailed, you tell me? Back in 2019, there was no confirmation of human-to-human transmission of the novel coronavirus. Human-to-human transmission was confirmed on 21st January 2020, and Wuhan entered lockdown shortly after. Video: China confirms human-to-human transmission of new coronavirus youtu.be/XPbdMRXQhdE (dated to 21st January 2020)
    5
  6106.  @dragonhero7975  It's sad that some Indians (but not all) choose to respond to China's achievements with resentment and jealousy. There are many things Indians can do to improve their country and make life better for themselves, yet some Indians choose to post hateful comments in response to China's methods.
    5
  6107.  @chxrliecyr  When China introduced lockdowns, the West mocked China's measures as "draconian." Now countries all over the world are following China and implementing lockdowns of their own.
    5
  6108.  @tedchandran  If your smartphone is lost, stolen or broken, but your WeChat Wallet account is still accessible, then you can still access your digital Renminbi after installing WeChat on a new phone and accessing your WeChat Wallet account. If you lost your card contain digital Renminbi, then the money is lost, just like real money in a wallet when you lose it.
    5
  6109. The most salient point is that Meng Wanzhou finally gets to come home after 3 long years, since her detention in Dec 2018.
    5
  6110.  @yili3339  Remember that there are multiple definitions of "Democracy" itself. Westerner's brand of democracy is "liberal democracy" but it doesn't mean that every country should follow Western democracy. China has our own brand of democracy.
    5
  6111. Chinese workers come to African countries like Nigeria, Angola, Kenya, etc, to help build roads, railways, highways, infrastructure, schools, hotels, hospitals, shopping centers, football stadiums, telecommunication projects, to make African society better. China has done much in Africa in decades, compared to what Westerners did in Africa for centuries.
    5
  6112.  @CHINESE_PRIDE  "It's China that is dependent upon the west, not the other way around." How so? China literally makes the stuff the West needs.
    5
  6113.  @leungrubing7031  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。。。
    5
  6114. ​ @TacticalMayo  Not everyone gets to be number one all the time, why not allow others to take up that position?
    5
  6115. +LaGG335 SBD3 Agreed. India is the world's largest democracy, with world's 2nd largest population after China. Republic of India was founded in 1947, whereas People's Republic of China was founded 2 years later, in 1949. Yet China has long surpassed India in many aspects.
    5
  6116. Russia's military tactics is just like playing Weiqi (围棋 "Go") where the objective of the board game is to to try and surround more territory than your opponent.
    5
  6117. About Carrie Lam being "chosen," that's in accordance with Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條) which states the following: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." - Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45. Therefore, it's within the Central People's Government (Beijing’s) right to appoint the Hong Kong Chief Executive and the mainland is not breaking any laws by doing so.
    5
  6118.  @soundbite290  Most of Hong Kong's 7 million population aren't protesting, so how can you claim Hong Kong people do not want to be ruled by China? Shouting in capital letters doesn't mean that you are right. Look at the protestors and most of them are Hong Kong highschool students, who haven't even graduated from school and step out into the working world of adults. Yet these students already think they know the best way to govern Hong Kong already? Better than Hong Kong's leaders?
    5
  6119.  @soundbite290  Why don't you attempt to refute my points instead of accusing me of being 50 cents? Those Hong Kong student protestors haven't even reach 21 years of age (which is the legal voting age in Hong Kong) so their minds haven't matured to the point of political awareness, so why should Hong Kong government bow down to theses "underaged voters" demands then? There is no logic to support your claim that people of Hong Kong are against the extradition bill.
    5
  6120. The USA incite political unrest in so-called "banana republic" countries. Now USA have riots over the election results, just like one.
    5
  6121.  @huyifan83  America should put Native American language on their signboards and their dollar bills.
    5
  6122.  @peterhanssens7260  Huawei CEO Ren Zhengfei said Huawei did not steal Nortel’s IP, and it was the 2000 market crash that ultimately did in Nortel. Also, how is a sking for asking a company to transfer technology as a precondition to enter a market considered blackmail? Nobody point a gun these companies and force them to set up shop here in China, if your company disagree with our terms, then your company is welcome to pack your bags and take your business elsewhere, if you don't want to obey Chinese laws while in China.
    5
  6123.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "Ideology and business don't mix" That's China's motto. China isn't interested in spreading communism like the former Soviet Union (or the USA with democracy), instead China is willing to do business with countries that want to do business with China. But Canada is bringing politics into business by arresting Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou on orders by the USA, so isn't Canada mixing politics and business here?
    5
  6124.  @peterhanssens7260  About innovation in China, China applies for more patents than any other country in the world and we also have the world's largest number of granted patents, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Indicators#Patents Patent applications for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (1,542,002 patents) 2. United States (597,141 patents) 3. Japan (313,567 patents) 4. South Korea (209,992 patents) 5. European Patent Office (174,397 patents) 6. Germany (67,898 patents) ... Patent grants for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (432,147 patents) 2. United States (307,759 patents) 3. Japan (194,525 patents) 4. European Patent Office (127,603 patents) 5. South Korea (119,012 patents) 6. Russian Federation (35,774 patents) ...
    5
  6125.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "Unfortunately, this is why China either steals intellectual property to make up for lost time or doesn't want to invest in the effort of innovation" Who says China does not invest in innovation? The Chinese government is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending after the USA: Countries by Research and Development spending 1. United States ($612.7 billion) 2. China ($514.8 billion) 3. Japan ($172.6 billion) 4. Germany ($131.9 billion) 5. South Korea ($100.0 billion) 6. India ($66.5 billion) 7. France ($63.6 billion) 8. United Kingdom ($51.7 billion) ... Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending#List In the West, researchers often have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    5
  6126. When USA also invade Iraq because of suspicion of harboring WMDs. But after Iraq war, no WMDs were ever found. Now, USA accuse Syria of using chemical weapons, so can't you see the pattern here? Installing democracy is bad, because USA goes about bombing and invading countries to do so, from the failed Vietnam War and Korean War, to the Middle East. Mao Zedong killed Chinese people, because it was a Chinese Civil War at that time and Chinese were killing Chinese, just like in the American Civil War, Americans killed Americans. But today, China is currently not at war with any country since 1979, and is instead building infrastructure in less developed countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Maldives, and also African countries like Kenya, Nigeria, Angola, Djibouti, etc.
    5
  6127.  @Ghekko-kw3zz  "Shenzhou. Little pink with a bot farm." You resort to hurling personal insults against me (and others who share similar views as mine) just because I'm against the militaristic expansion of NATO, while being supportive of the economic expansion of BRICS?
    5
  6128.  @zetristan4525  You said: "Mao was mostly disgusting." He was the one who succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous administration did not achieve for for 37 years.
    5
  6129.  Dumb & Dumber  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: Wikipedia: White Terror (Taiwan) But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    5
  6130. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since faded to history. Chinese people been wearing luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while most of the world were wearing loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas.
    5
  6131.  @namelesssnitchy  Why do you want Chinese people to stand up to the Communist Party of China? The CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country. So why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China?
    5
  6132.  @huiyangong1073  When Tibet was under their own Dalai lama rule, Tibet was brutal theocracy where 95% of Tibetans were slaves and the top 5% were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is low and the slaves had to work hard to feed the population. Starvation and crime were commonplace, theft was punished by amputation, even skinning! There is this Tibetan drum known damaru that is composed of human skulls, with drumskin made from human skin and drumstick made by human bone. The Dalai Lama was worshipped as holy person, and his followers fight among themselves for the right to consumer his saliva, his urine (and even his feces) because Dalai Lama was seen as a divine vessel. After Tibet returned China, Chinese help modernise and develop Tibet, building roads, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, as well as introducing modern technology like cars, computers, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping, and so on. Even the poorest Tibetan farmer owns a smartphone and can shop online in Taobao and have purchases shipped all the way to Lhasa. Under Chinese rule, the first Tibetan universities were founded in Lhasa, and hydroelectric powerstations were built in Tibet to supply green energy to Tibetans. The Qinghai-Lhasa (world's highest elevation railway) was built through difficult mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments to connect the normally isolated Tibet to rest of the world. Tibetans can now import food from the mainland and a thriving tourist industry has sprung up in Tibet. Sources: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Therefore, I would make the claim that Tibetans lives have improved a lot under Chinese rule.
    5
  6133. It's a combination of the Red Scare and Yellow Peril mindset that's fueling anti-Russian and anti-China sentiment in the West. And it's having the effect of pushing both our countries closer together than we've ever been.
    5
  6134. -Republic of India was founded in 1947, whereas People's Republic of China founded in 1949 (2 years later) -India has world's 2nd largest population so a comparable workforce as large as that of China's. -Many Indians speak English, whereas many Chinese people still struggle with English today. -India is democratic, whereas China is 'communist' ... Yet curiously why didn't the United States invest in democratic India, instead of communist China, given the above?
    5
  6135.  @forearth6685  I never said that culture means only religion or that it cannot exist without religion. Where did you hear me say that from?
    5
  6136. Unlike USA, where it's every state for itself during Covid19, and they poached PPE supplies from each other.
    5
  6137. The United States had Covid19 vaccines that were due to expire, yet USA refused to share those vaccines with Australians who desperately need those vaccines. Why do Australians continue to think of themselves as the U.S "deputy sheriff" in Asia?
    5
  6138.  Snehasish Ghosh  You Indians love Chinese products. Take smartphones for example and Xiaomi is the top-selling smartphone brand in India. Video: How Xiaomi broke out of China to go global | CNBC reports youtu.be/291DlKa7iIU Xiaomi was started in 2010, today its one of the world's most popular smartphones. In India it's number one.
    5
  6139.  @teamtryxgg281  China had previously conducted hypersonic weapons tests like the DF-ZF, however, the latest launch was actually a routine spaceflight test, not a hypersonic weapons test.
    5
  6140. -If India blockades Chinese trade to Western countries like USA and Europe, then won't those countries not take kindly to India's blocking of their trade with China? What makes you think those countries are willing to risk damage to their economies, just for India's sake? Also, can India even manage a proper blockade? -China is Russia's largest trade partner, not India. What does India have to offer to Russia, that would make Russia choose India over China? Russia will support any nation that opposes USA, and if USA sides with India, then Russia will side with China. After all, if China is destroyed, then who is going help Russia oppose USA? -China has conducted numerous live-fire exercises in Tibet before, moving troops and war equipment across the Tibetan plateau. China is building roads in Tibet to help speed up transport in the Tibetan plateau during peacetime, as well as speeding up the supply lines during wartime. -China has military assets like stealth fighters like Chengdu J-20, anti-satellite capabilities, hypersonic missiles that travel many times faster than the speed of sound and difficult to intercept, as well as the world's longest range ICBM, DF-41. The DF-41 also has Multiple Independent Reentry Vehicle (MIRV) capability of up to 10 warheads, meaning that it can target up to 10 targets independently with each launch.
    5
  6141. Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when Mongolian conquered it and then conquered Song dynasty China, and made Tibet part of Yuan dynasty China. What makes you so certain Tibetans will be willing to fight against China?
    5
  6142. Soul Chicken I have shown evidence to support my points, but what evidence have you ever shown at all to support your claim that nobody likes China?
    5
  6143. TentatheSane The Tibetans government signed an agreement (Seventeen Point Agreement) with China in 1951, affirming China's sovereignty over Tibet, so why do you claim they were annexed without their consent? Lots of China's neighbours like S. Korea, Japan (and even Taiwan) have China as their biggest trade partner, so why would they join India in blocking trade with China, when it will harm their own economies? For example, China once restricted South Korean businesses in China (because of US THAAD deployment in S. Korea) and S. Korean economy suffered a lot. So why would they join India's blockade of China and harm their own economies? According to statistics, China received the following number of foreign tourists from the following places in 2016. 1. Taiwan (5,730,000) 2. South Korea (4,775,000) 3. Vietnam (3,167,010) 4. Japan (2,590,700) ... ... So why do you claim China's neighbours hate China, when those people form the bulk of China's tourism?
    5
  6144.  @MarkYeung1  I'm saying Meng and the Michaels are from different income groups, whoever said anything about no income? They both have different residences, then why do you factor their residence into your argument for? As for the 2 Michaels, Spavor has been sentenced to 11 years jail for spying, and Korvig is also charged with espionage.
    5
  6145.  @brianplum1825  Your statement was "What the hell have the Commies ever invented?" and I answered accordingly so what's your point? Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions?
    5
  6146. China's existing CCTV mass surveillance system already has the name 天网 "Sky Net"
    5
  6147.  @cantripleplays  Yes they do really.
    5
  6148.  @blackjackpershing6469  The mighty US army lost a 20-year war in Afghanistan against a bunch of insurgents, leaving behind billions of dollars of US military equipment for the Taliban to seize.
    5
  6149.  @yslee1401  If you claim Taiwan had been independent, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the UN? Is there some force preventing Taiwan from joining the UN like an independent country can?
    5
  6150.  @zilun  China violating WTO rules year after year? According to WTO website on dispute settlement: United States: 131 cases as complainant, 165 cases as respondent European Union: 102 cases as complainant, 94 cases as respondent China: 22 cases as complainant, 43 cases as respondent. Source: Map of disputes between WTO Members wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_maps_e.htm So which country violates the most WTO rules year after year here, if not the United States?
    5
  6151.  @nedkelly9688  "神州 Shenzhou so Asians have all invaded one another at one time in history.. go look in the mirror." True, but it's mostly limited to within the region of Asia. Whereas the United States is sending armies to invade countries from the other side of the Pacific Ocean.
    5
  6152. Many Indians (but not all) are still suffering from a "colonial mindset" that's been imposed on the colonized by the colonizer. Even though Britain has since physically decolonized from India, the "decolonization of the mind" still needs to happen in India to undo the mental damage of colonialism.
    5
  6153.  @Zerpentsa6598  They even sensored your comment on this thread.
    5
  6154. Prof Zhang Weiwei summed up China's political system as "Selection + Election". Selection: Candidates go through vigorous exams & tests and fulfill promises. This is derived from the Chinese Imperial Examination system. Election: Candidates must garner popular support behind their actions. This is derived from the Western election process.
    5
  6155.  @dragonslayer7587  Agreed. Not backing your currency is kinda like the cartoon where Wild. E Coyote chases Road Runner off a cliff, yet continues to run over mid-air. There's nothing supporting him underneath and it's only a matter of time before he realizes and gravity "catches up" to him.
    5
  6156. +Haren Rajbonshi What has Chinese Medical Visa requirements even got to do with Chinese investment in Pakistan? Pakistani workers are working in their home country, not China, so why would they need China medical visa? What has that got to do with this? As for funding, there is already much development in Pakistan, since the economic corridor project started, and many Chinese companies are working in Pakistan too to help build infrastructure. Look at Gwadar port, and noticed how developed it has become. Numerous powerplants are popping up in Punjab, Sindh, etc. It is estimated that the economic corridor project will result in the creation of upwards of 2.3 million jobs in Pakistan.
    5
  6157.  @christopherhamlin6139  Well, if other countries offer their property for sale, then can't Chinese investors buy those property? And who says people aren't buying property in China? In urban areas, 96% of all households own at least one home; 20% own at least two, according to the People's Bank of China.
    5
  6158. You said: "Russia has superior manpower which they can throw into the meat grinder." If that's really the case, then why is Russia relying on remotely operated equipment like land mines and drone strikes, as well as long-range attacks with artillery and missile strikes, instead of resorting to human-wave tactics? Also, Russian army willing surrenders ground (i.e abandoned Kherson) in order to preserve its soldiers lives, whereas the Ukrainian army fights to defend every last inch of territory (i.e Bakhmut) at the cost of its soldiers.
    5
  6159. China's adult literacy rate is 99%. United State's adult literacy rate is 79%.
    5
  6160.  @zenlei8258  Censorship is necessary, because words can mislead and incite riots. Look at Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapdragon, banning the POTUS account, after the January 6th Capitol Hill riots. Why not give Trump free reign over his Twitter account? Yet you're calling me a f**kn coward? Who do you think you are?
    5
  6161.  @Rick-tb4so  Mainland China reserves the right to conduct military operations in the Taiwan Strait, after the U.S House of Speakers representative visited Taiwan.
    5
  6162. Search for Teresa Teng's "The Moon Represents My Heart" 《月亮代表我的心》song for Mandarin eargasm.
    5
  6163. The Hare (NATO) is exhausting their ability to send arms to Ukraine, while complaining that the Tortoise is too slow. Meanwhile, the Tortoise (Russia) has plenty of reserves and making slow but steady progress towards the finish line. And we know who eventually won the race in the fable of the Tortoise and the Hare .
    5
  6164.  @deepone5005  Precisely. It was Australia that first started sabre rattling by sailing its warships through Taiwan strait, so mainland China responded in kind with a bigger sabre. Furthermore, no one really thinks Australia will get involved in a conflict in the Taiwan strait, they're sailing warship through the strait just to provoke the mainland. Whereas China's live fire exercise demonstrates China's commitment to defending our sovereignty.
    5
  6165.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  How's you reporting your professor for his justification of Russia to the University? It seems that cancel culture has overtaken the West with regards to ethnic Russians being pressured to denounce their motherland or else. Russian athletes are getting banned from participating in the Olympics. Russian sportsmen are being denied participation in competitions unless they denounce their homeland. Russian musicians, conductors, dancers, artists are being cancelled just for being of Russian descent. Your professor appears to be justified when he says the West is crap.
    5
  6166. The funny thing is that the Build Back Better bill is being blocked by some in the Democrats (Biden's own party) in congress
    5
  6167.  @Wbliss  Indeed. China has produced a staggering variety of smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Lenovo, Oppo, Vivo, ZTE, whereas in America, it's a monopoly with Apple being pretty much the only American smartphone company, having eliminated competition in the industry from smaller local American firms.
    5
  6168.  @MarkYeung1  In China, religions are tolerated but they can never be allowed to supersede the government of China. Historically, people have often hijacked religion for political purposes, such as Hong Xiuquan (洪秀全) whom in 19th century Qing Dynasty, had proclaimed himself as "Son of God" and "Brother to Jesus". His associate founded the God Worshipping Society (拜上帝会) which amassed over 10,000 followers and eventually, Hong organized a rebel army and rebelled against the Qing, marking the beginning of the Taiping Rebellion. The Taiping Rebellion was one of the bloodiest civil wars in China, with a death toll of 20-30 million people in China. China will not let such a civil war happen again in China, all in the name of religion. This is the reason why in China, the government is above religion and that religion can never be allowed to supersede the government.
    5
  6169.  @MarkYeung1  "Hong Kong was under British rule at that time." Hong Kong was under British occupation, it was Chinese territory that was taken over by Britain after the First Opium War. Many Hong Kongers (possibly including yourself) have been brought up to think of Hong Kong as part of Britain, when in actuality it's not. This "colonial mentality" continues to affect many people in Hong Kong, because they've taught by the British education system to regard themselves as British subjects. Even if you claim it's British internal affairs, the fact remains that Hong Kong has historical ties with China. Just like those former Soviet Union states have history with Russia. Also, Hong Kong and mainland China are neighbors, much like those Baltic States are neighbors of Russia. But what is the relation between Tibet and the United States? You call out China and Russia for intervening in our neighbors, but you ignore it when the US is involved in Tibet?
    5
  6170.  @MarkYeung1  "this day, the Canadian government acknowledges the harms they did to the indigenous people of Canada." They still continue to inflict harm upon the indigenous people. Despite being one of the most water-rich nations in the world, for generations Canada has been unwilling to guarantee access to clean water for Indigenous peoples and the water in dozens of communities has been considered unsafe to drink for at least a year. Mercury contamination in the community of Grassy Narrows has remained unaddressed for decades, and neither has Canadian government offered compensation to most of the community affected by mercury poisoning.
    5
  6171.  @MarkYeung1  Meng Wanzhou's Section 8 rights against unreasonable search and seizure were still violated. Meng's luggage was searched and her electronic devices were taken from her, as well as the passcodes to them. She also wasn't allowed to contact her lawyer to ask for legal advice on her detention by the Canadian authorities.
    5
  6172.  @MarkYeung1  "These are good governments. They put people ahead of politics." Developed countries like Canada are buying up and hoarding Covid-19 vaccines, leaving little to none for the developing countries. Canadian government has secured enough vaccines for 5x it's population size. As of March 2021, Canada had secured over 300 million doses, enough to cover their population 5 times over. youtu.be/2ty2J0s2W0c?t=182 Imagine 1 Canadian having access to 5 Covid-19 vaccines, while elsewhere in the world, 10 Africans have to fight for access to 1 Covid-19 vaccine.
    5
  6173. In chess, if you don't choose your steps wisely, then your opponent will choose them for you, and that's exactly what Russian forces are doing by shaping the battlefield, while Ukrainian forces are being shaped by Russia.
    5
  6174. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 You said: "claims an entire ocean belongs to them" Which ocean are you referring to? Pacific Ocean? Atlantic Ocean?
    5
  6175. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 Here's a map of Qing Dynasty China (images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/06/f114660d2bf5452994135c4c.gif ) and Tibet was clearly part of Qing Dynasty China.
    5
  6176.  @johanhirte9661  But countries all over the world have since acknowledged the One China policy that Taiwan is part of China. Even Donald Trump agreed to honour the One China Policy after receiving phonecall from President Xi. Source: Trump Tells Xi Jinping U.S. Will Honor ‘One China’ Policy nytimes.com/2017/02/09/world/asia/donald-trump-china-xi-jinping-letter.html
    5
  6177.  @Rasyad95  Indonesia is world's largest Muslim population country and Suharto banned expressions of Chinese culture through language, religion, and traditional festivals and the ethnic Chinese were pressured to adopt Indonesian-sounding names. But nobody cares what happened to Chinese in Muslim countries, they only care what happens to Muslims in China.
    5
  6178.  @Sean-giang  "Shenzhou. and those medals from Chinese Taipei never made it to China" Firstly, I'm glad since you are sticking to calling it "Chinese Taipei," which means you've acknowledged that the island is part of China. Secondly, neither were the medals from Hong Kong athletes included inside mainland China's total tally. China is unique in the sense that athletes from Hong Kong and Taiwan can score medals separately in the Olympics, while still being recognized as part of China. Not all governments are as flexible as to allow this arrangement.
    5
  6179.  @Sean-giang  Both the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China identify as the same country, China. What are you talking about? Both have the word "China" in their name.
    5
  6180. ​ @cyber5515 Tibet is already internationally recognized as part of the People's Republic of China. When you look up the map of China, Tibet is regarded as part of China. As for the 14th Dalai Lama, he was an agent of the CIA, having accepted American money to carry out separatist activities in Tibet against the Central People's Government. Declassified CIA files have revealed that a total of $1,735,000 (equivalent to $17,590,145 in 2024) was devoted to the Tibetan program for 1964.
    5
  6181. Facebook is responsible for much evil on the world. The name Facebook sounds like Fēisǐ bùkě (非死不可) in Mandarin, which translates to "Must Die!" or "Have to Die!"
    5
  6182.  @charliecooper3030  "Before 2008, tons of people used Google in China." But Baidu appeared and Google lost their number 1 position to Baidu. Google struggled for a while but ultimately failed to regain their former position. Here's a graph for the top search engines in China by market share from 2009-2020 and Google failed to capture majority market share youtu.be/ZVkbzy2gfnw
    5
  6183.  @zackk4393  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    5
  6184.  @CarollemMen-cl8nz  The two terms are fundamentally different. A humanitarian pause just means that the victims get to eat something, before the bombing and killing continues.
    5
  6185. Capitalism is responsible for unequal global vaccine distribution, because the rich developed countries can buy up and hoard Covid-19 vaccines, leaving behind little to no Covid-19 vaccines for the poorer developing countries. Communism is the belief that scarce resources should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs (German: Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen)" In a truly communist world, the vaccines would be distributed according to needs, meaning that the poorer developing countries have priority in access to much needed vaccines.
    5
  6186. just minnie sounds triggered here.
    5
  6187.  @ne0ge049  Financially? China actually bought an estimated 1.1 trillion dollars ($1,100,000,000,000) worth of U.S debt to help the U.S tide itself over the 2008 financial crisis. Yet you're claiming "China is pure garbage"?
    5
  6188.  @zetristan4525  You said: "I was just addressing a commenter who trolls Cyrus' comment sections by copying in the same comments again and again, to propagandize readers." Since the comment was made by first NATO General Secretary, then why is posting it again considered trolling?
    5
  6189.  @zetristan4525  You said: "- Rarely build bridges and international solutions (like Cyrus tries to)." Cyrus is Cyrus, whereas Shenzhou is Shenzhou. Why are you seemingly imposing Cyrus' ideals onto me? If anything, Cyrus' comment section is full of people with all sorts of different views, so can't I take a different approach from Cyrus? You said: "- Rehash what we already know to feed antagonism. (Mockery instead of constructive balanced accuracy)" I don't see you providing any comments of your own that contain "constructive balanced accuracy," all you seem to do is complain about other people's right to post comments in Cyrus' comment section is all.
    5
  6190. "The West is an empire of lies." - Vladimir Putin
    5
  6191.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou So Putin attack the entire Ukraine just because of 2 small republic 5% of the entire area." Germany attacked Poland, yet the Allies took the fight to Germany itself instead of fighting in Poland alone, isn't it? You said: "Killing tens of thousands of civilians, and you're happy about it." Do you have evidence that tens of thousands of civilians were killed? I believe the official UN figures at the moment are only in the hundreds, not tens of thousands.
    5
  6192.  @EmotoOregon  The Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China, incorporating those territories into Yuan Dynasty China. Manchu conquerors did the same thing with Tibet during Qing Dynasty. Tibet briefly broke free of China in 1912, but was eventually reunified with China by 1952.
    5
  6193.  @MarkYeung1  Do you watch the Western anti-China propaganda like the BBC where they applied filters to make trees in China appear gray instead of green? Video: youtu.be/3gI7AZFx5Q0
    5
  6194.  @myresponsesarelimited7895  The Duran is an excellent channel when it comes to understanding Russia, Ukraine and the West. But when the topic is China, the Duran just aren't as informed about it as Brian.
    5
  6195.  @yohasakura5903  Chinese government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and halt all production, impose quarantine measures, banning mass gatherings, banning theme parks and other tourist destinations like Great Wall of China and so on, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and contain the coronavirus. The damage to our economy, our tourism, our production finally paid off now that the virus is under control and our economy is finally restarting slowly. But in Western countries like US and UK, their economy is too precious to sacrifice, so human health has to be sacrificed instead. President Trump has downplayed the virus and British PM Johnson is relying on "herd immunity" to pull thorough.
    5
  6196.  @SCIFIGAMESFANS  Its actual name is the Communist Party of China (CPC not the CCP). It's name in Chinese is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where Zhōngguó (中国) means China and Gòngchǎndǎng (共产党) means Communist Party.
    5
  6197.  @bartonlee3594  Could you tell me the actual name of this so-called "arbitral tribune" that you keep on mentioning? You've been calling it "The interational tribune" or "an Arbitral Tribunal" or "The Tribunal" or "the Arbitral Tribunal". Well why is it that you cannot outright give me the proper name of this "arbitral tribune"?
    5
  6198. Never pull off the same trick twice. People will have already seen through your first trick and develop a counterstrategy. Trump's tariffs didn't work the first time, neither will they work this time as China is well-prepared and responding accordingly.
    5
  6199. Agreed. If you count the total number of elections in Hong Kong, there were more elections after the 1997 handover than for 150 years as a British colony.
    5
  6200.  @klytouch7515  It's the Western war-mongers that can't wait any longer, and are impatient for the mainland to make a move on Taiwan. But the Chinese government has demonstrated great patience and isn't making any move on Taiwan, despite Western speculation among themselves.
    5
  6201.  @everythingandmore5537  "神州 Shenzhou Wuhan doctors already knew on 1 December 2019." How? You think doctors magically know all the properties of newly discovered viruses? It was called the novel coronavirus at one stage because it was still new to science, yet you're blaming China for not informing the rest of the world? And even when Western countries had access to Covid-19 genome, they choose to do the nothing to prepare for eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, that's why the Western democracies are suffering today, because of their catastrophic failure to deal with the pandemic.
    5
  6202.  @everythingandmore5537  "神州 Shenzhou China prevented WHO investigators from coming in January 2020." Because the situation wasn't stable back then, Wuhan was under lockdown, why allow the WHO investigators into Wuhan in January 2020? If the house is on fire, do you conduct an investigation into the origins of fire while the house is still burning? Just like today, Western democracies houses are still on fire, yet they rather point fingers at China and blame China for their problems? When they could see China's house on fire earlier?
    5
  6203. @反共 那现在为什么印度不能控制病毒？
    5
  6204.  @everythingandmore5537  "神州 Shenzhou in a totalitarian system news of the virus was hidden and doctors were arrested. This allowed the virus to escape to all parts of the world." Think about it, had China released the news, there would be widespread panic in Wuhan and more people would had fled Wuhan and infected the world, so strictly speaking, didn't China do the right thing here? Would you rather China not lockdown Wuhan and left people leave to infect the rest of the world?
    5
  6205.  @everythingandmore5537  Traces of Covid-19 have been found in Barcelona sewers in Spain, since March 2019 before the outbreak in Wuhan even began. Spanish virologists have found traces of the novel coronavirus in a sample of Barcelona waste water collected in March 2019, nine months before the COVID-19 disease was identified in China, the University of Barcelona said. Source: Coronavirus traces found in March 2019 sewage sample, Spanish study shows (reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-spain-science-idUSKBN23X2HQ )
    5
  6206. USA has double standards. Saudi Arabian prince had killed a journalist (Khashoggi) and Trump stood with the Saudi prince, calling the journalist "an enemy of the state". Even after Trump, the Biden Administration is reluctant to call out the Saudi prince's actions.
    5
  6207.  @theangrycanuck8331  Didn't ordinary Americans voted to elect their government though?
    5
  6208.  @John2r1  Another point to note is that China is not just about Han Chinese. The Manchu conquerors of Qing Dynasty China had redefined China to a multi-ethnic state, and they rejected the idea that "China" only meant Han areas. After conquering "China proper", the Manchus identified their state as "China" (中國, Zhōngguó; "Middle Kingdom"), and referred to it as Dulimbai Gurun in Manchu (Dulimbai means "central" or "middle," gurun means "nation" or "state"). The emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, Tibet and other areas) as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that "China" only meant Han areas. ... Source: Wikipedia: Qing Dynasty And as you've stated, Taiwan was part of Qing Dynasty China's map.
    5
  6209.  @edward8972  I'm just pointing out that Trump's "China Initiative" targeting ethnic Chinese students as potential spies slowly chasing away Chinese scholars due to racial profiling. These Chinese students might decide not to study in America if USA keeps up with this initiative, and it's likely that they'll either study elsewhere or return to China. This represents a loss of potential brainpower for the USA.
    5
  6210.  Dumb & Dumber  China had survived the 2008 Financial Crisis that shook Western economies, and even during 2020, China was the only G20 country to record positive economic growth, during the pandemic.
    5
  6211.  @sara.cbc92  What parallel universe do you live in where the Japanese did not commit war crimes during WWII? Were the Japanese the good guys during WWII and Chinese were the bad guys in your parallel world?
    5
  6212. I feel bad for the other 5 Eyes countries i.e Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand, for just blindly hopping onboard the boycott wagon after the Biden Administration announced it was diplomatically boycotting the 2022 Beijing Olympics. The USA is literally taking the other 5 Eyes countries for a ride, and is now U.S has hopped off the boycott wagon.
    5
  6213.  @namelesssnitchy  The way the USA keeps on weaponizing the US Dollar and slapping sanctions on Iran, Russia, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, etc, the digital Yuan is going seem more and more like an attractive option as an alternative currency for countries.
    5
  6214.  @item6931  You said: "Their King is a figurehead, not a tribal one with true power." The British Royalty has the power to veto UK policies, not approve them or pass them into law. And if you're claiming he's a figurehead, then why do British taxpayers have to pay 200 million pounds for the coronation ceremony? For him to do nothing?
    5
  6215.  @RockyRover999  You said: "I was buying Chinese watch , had to change it every three months," What's the name of this Chinese watch brand?
    5
  6216.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "As a HongKongers, I went to visit in the mainland many times and did encountered discrimination and unfriendly faces." Could you elaborate on your encounter of discrimination and unfriendly faces in mainland China? As far as I know, mainland Chinese have been taught to regard the people of Hong Kong as part of the same family and Hong Kongers often receive a warm welcome in the mainland. Sadly, the same feeling is not always reciprocated by the people of Hong Kong towards mainlanders.
    5
  6217. Here are the 3 golden rules of geopolitics that the West best take heed. Rule No. 1: Don't March on Moscow. Rule No. 2: Don't Bluff Beijing. Rule No. 3: Don't Test Tehran.
    5
  6218. Peng Shuai is clearly safe and she has appeared on IOC video call expressing her desire for her personal privacy to be respected. But the WTA is behaving like the paparazzi and demanding that she appear in public to bare her private affairs for all the world to see.
    5
  6219. "Why do people take India seriously?" Probably because of India's huge population.
    5
  6220. China built world's fastest supercomputer Sunway Taihulight 神威·太湖之光, as well as the 2nd fastest supercomputer Tianhe-2 天河-2. China built the world's largest radio telescope, the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST) also known as Tianyan 天眼 or Eye of the Heavens. China is also home to the world's largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed railway in terms of track length. Source: China Finishes Building World's Largest Radio Telescope space.com/33357-china-largest-radio-telescope-alien-life.html
    5
  6221. @Red Disaster Singapore and China actually share many political similarities. Singapore has been ruled by authoritarian single-party People's Action Party for its entire life as nation. For over 50 years, PAP ruled Singapore with an iron fist and Lee Kuan Yew was a (benevolent) dictator who tolerated no dissent, jailed and exiled dissidents and political rivals. But Singapore transformed from sleepy fishing village nation into a prosperous world-class country over its neighbours. Similarly, China has been ruled by authoritarian single-party Communist Party of China for 70th years, transforming our country from dirt-poor nation into the world's 2nd largest economy.
    5
  6222.  @yslee1401  Falun Dafa was founded in in 1992 by a man called Li Hongzhi, by hijacking existing practices from Taoism, Buddhism and traditional Chinese qigong practices. This should already sound off alarm bells that Falun Dafa is actually a cult in disguise of a religion. The followers of Falun Gong believe that their leader, "Master Li", purportedly possesses supernatural powers such as the ability to cure all ailments and none are allowed to question the basic assumptions concerning his purported supernatural powers, teachings and/or opinions. There are cases of early-stage cancer patients who refused to seek proper medical treatment and instead they were encouraged to donate their savings to Li in hopes of him curing their cancer. The cancer patients died in the end.
    5
  6223. Chauncy Yao Besides the Dongfeng series, China has Julang-2 (JL-2) intercontinental submarine launched ballistic missile (SLBM) that is capable "surprise" delivery from the waters, even capable of reaching the US mainland. There is also JL-3, China’s 3rd generation SLBM, able to ultilize multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRV) to deliver multiple goods to multiple recipients. It's is undergoing tests today and expected to be ready soon. Additionally, China has YingJi-12 (YJ-12) which is supersonic "sea skimming" missile launched by fighters or bombers, for a more "stealthy" delivery. A saturation delivery by YJ-12s is going to be a surprise for any US aircraft carrier recipient. If you want even more stealthy delivery, China's YJ-18 offers a subsonic cruise mode (even more stealthy approach) and a supersonic terminal attack I mean delivery system.
    5
  6224.  @valenrn8657  What does: "It was inhabited by various peoples who included the Indo-European-speaking Tocharians in Turfan and Kucha," even got to do with the fact that "By the time the Han dynasty under Emperor Wu (r. 141–87 BC) wrested the western Tarim Basin away from its previous overlords"? My statement that Xinjiang was part of China even before Jesus Christ himself was born, remains unchallenged.
    5
  6225. Cyrus doesn't know that we can protest in China. According to statistics, China sees on average some 500 protests every day over a wide variety of grievances, including corruption, forced evictions, unpaid wages, human rights abuses, environmental degradation, ethnic protests, petitioning for religious freedom and civil liberties, protests against one-party rule, as well as nationalist protests against foreign countries. The number of annual protests has grown steadily since the early 1990s, from approximately 8,700 "mass group incidents" in 1993 to over 87,000 in 2005. In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010 (that's an average of 493 protests every day in 2010)
    5
  6226.  @johnblasiak607  You can't own property in China, that's the beauty of our system; China: All land is state-owned and not even locals can own property, let alone foreigners in China. Other countries: Land is for sale, even to foreigners like Chinese investors. So after some time, who's winning and who's losing? Why blame Chinese government when your government is the one offering your lands for sale?
    5
  6227.  @texajp1946  Thanks, it's a pity Jackson Hinkle missed my sarcasm in the stream. But I don't blame him, sarcasm often doesn't translate well in text.
    5
  6228.  @echelon2k8  "Is a yes or no answer to that question really too much to ask?" Because the question is phrased to limit the answer to only one of two options. It's an example of what's called a false dichotomy used in an argument to force your opponent into an extreme position by making the assumption that there are only two positions, when there are other possible options available. You said: "China likes to pretend that they're always neutral by not taking sides or interfering in other nations affairs, yet they also say that they want to continue to do trade with both Russia and the Ukraine at this time as per usual." Yeah, what's wrong with that? Isn't that usually what neutral countries do by continuing trading with both Russia and Ukraine at this time per usual? Otherwise what would a true neutral country do in this position if not continue trading with both countries? You said: "Where everyone else is putting sanctions where they are rightly deserved for an invasion of another sovereign country, China has not condemned Russia, they are instead financially supporting them." Not everyone else, even India (world's largest self-declared democracy) has abstained from the UN assembly vote and isn't condemning Russia, just like China. In fact, India just recently purchased 3 million barrels of oil from Russia at a discount (and in rupees too!) You said: "Supporting the likes of a dictator (someone who China's leader has given a friendship medal to and declared a no limits partnership with) who would threaten nuclear war to anyone who would get in his way." Sounds just like USA supporting Saudi Arabian monarchy and their crown prince murdering a reporter, Jamal Khashoggi, and getting no condemnation from the USA. You said: "The world won't forget China's role in this any time soon, especially if they themselves ever attempt to invade another democracy, such as Taiwan." Taiwan is part of China (according to their own constitution) so how can China invade ourselves? In fact, most of the world (including USA, UK, Canada, Australia, EU countries, etc) recognizes Taiwan as part of China. Since Taiwan hasn't formally declared independence, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    5
  6229.  @ryanshiflett2178  Russia was helping to guarantee the Donetsk and Lugansk side of the Minsk Agreements, while France and Germany were supposed to guarantee Ukraine's side. But the Ukrainian ultra-nationalists neo nazis continued their shelling of those two regions for 8 years. According to UN statistics, some 13,000 people have been killed in the Ukraine civil war, and from 2018 onwards, some 80% of civilian casualties occurred on rebel held territories in Donbas. You said: "I am not denying that ultra-right groups in Ukraine are not an issue; they are, and they are also a major problem in Russia as well." Russia's far right groups do not dominate Russian politics to the level that Ukrainian ultra-nationalist neo-nazis do. There are several documentaries depicting Ukrainian fascism, by BBC and other Western documentaries. Most famous is Oliver Stone's 2016 documentary Ukraine On Fire, that explores fascism in Ukraine. Nazi Idols such as Stepan Bandera are still worshiped in Ukraine, and they even held Nazi "summer camps" to indoctrinate Ukrainian youth into the ideology. You said: "But Russia has no right to send its troops into another country without that country's consent... Fighting was limited to Donbass before, and now there is a full-scale war all over Ukraine..." Russia had declared Donetsk and Lugansk as independent republics, and Ukraine was about to launch yet another salvo of artillery fire into the two republics, so Russia stepped into put an end to the war that had been ongoing since the 2014 coup of Ukraine's government by the USA. When Germany attacked Poland during WWII, the Allies eventually took the fighting to Germany itself instead of just limiting their fighting to Poland right? Moscow is doing the same by taking the fighting to Kiev itself.
    5
  6230.  @echelon2k8  It is a false dichotomy, because it erroneously limits what options are available. China is neutral, so the answer may not necessarily be yes or no, those are answers meant for allies or enemies, not neutral countries. You said: "Are you Chinese, yes or no? "Well, actually I'm something else". You see how stupid that sounds?" There are people who are half-Chinese, so how's it stupid to pick a different answer other than yes or no? That's the fallacy of the false dichotomy because the issues are more complex than just two absolutes. You said: "A neutral country would be staying out of this completely, not be giving a country with sanctions imposed upon it for invading another country the ability to get around those sanctions." Do you actually have evidence of China giving Russia the ability to get around sanctions? Otherwise, what's wrong with China continuing to trade with both Ukraine and Russia like a neutral country would? You said: "When I say everyone else in this situation, I obviously mean the majority," Well, if you add up the populations of China, India, Pakistan and the rest of other countries that abstained in the UN assembly, it turns out that we make up more than 50% of the world's population, so it means our countries are the majority here. You said: "...not those who have placed relying on Russia for a particularly commodity as being more important to them than standing up for what's right." Well, did you know that even right now at this instant, EU countries are continuing purchasing Russian gas, despite all those other sanctions they thrown at Russia? So you're saying EU countries value this commodity than "standing up for what's right"? Are you perhaps one of those Social Justice Warriors that pounce on anyone who says anything politically incorrect? You said: "If not, what do you expect the US to do here?" Nothing, I'm just pointing out that USA continues to support a dictatorship like Saudi Arabia, since you talked about "supporting the likes of a dictator" You said: "Taiwan being part of China according to Taiwan's constitution does not mean that Taiwan is part of the Communist Party of China's China." Turns out that the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 also claims Taiwan as part of China, just like Taiwan's Republic of China 🇹🇼 constitution. In fact, Taiwan's constitution also claims the whole of mainland (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Just look up Map of ROC Administrative and Claims to see the amount of territory Taiwan claims. You said: "Mainland China is separate from Taiwanese China as it has two separate ruling governments with two separate constitutions." China is special in the sense that we allow separate government systems within our territory, known as the One Country, Two Systems policy. Just like Hong Kong has their own separate government from mainland China, yet Hong Kong is part of China, just like Taiwan is part of China. Having separate governments doesn't mean that they aren't separate, because their constitution says that Hong Kong and Taiwan are part of China. You said: "Taiwanese ruled China isn't a part of Mainland ruled China any more than Mainland ruled China isn't a part of the Taiwanese ruled China." Taiwan can continue to claim the mainland in their constitution, then can't the mainland claim Taiwan in our constitution? Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China. You said: "Taiwanese ruled China isn't a part of Mainland ruled China any more than Mainland ruled China isn't a part of the Taiwanese ruled China." But since we know both parties claim to be China, there's a mutual understanding of the One China Policy, that Taiwan is part of China, so how can a country invade ourselves? If anything, conflict between Taiwan and the mainland would be seen as a continuation of the previously stalled Chinese Civil War between the Nationalist Kuomintang and the Communists, that never truly ended. It's certainly not an invasion of another country, it's a civil war within the same country, China, as recognized by both parties.
    5
  6231.  @ryanshiflett2178  But the ultra-nationalists have taken over Ukraine's policies regarding Donbass, that's why there's been continued shelling of Donetsk and Lugansk for the past 8 years, and the Minsk Agreement wasn't able to be honored. Zelenskyy was elected because of his promise to bring peace to the Donbas region, yet he was unable to do so because the Azov Battalion threatened his life if he signed the Minsk Agreement. So Russia is not going to continue doing nothing while the killing of ethnic Russians in Donbass region continues and they have decided to act. You said: "Russia declared the republics as independent, but that does not make them independent by nature." Well, it makes Donetsk and Lugansk independent republics in Russia's eyes at least. And Ukraine's continued shelling of the two republics is seen by Russia as attack on two sovereign republics (much like how Germany attacked Poland) so Moscow took the fighting to Kiev, in very much the same way the Allies took the fighting to Germany itself, rather than limiting the fighting to Poland. The first part of my analogy involves three parties (Germany, Poland and the Allies) and the second part also involves three parties (Ukraine, Donbas republics, and Russia). Russia perceives the continued Ukrainian attacks on the two republics the same way the Allies perceive Germany's attack on Poland, and instead of limiting the fighting to Donbas, Moscow has taken the fighting to Kiev very much the same way the Allies took the fighting to Germany instead of limiting it to Poland.
    5
  6232. Sad indeed. Majority of the Hong Kong protestors are high school kids who haven't even graduated from school yet they already think they know how to best govern Hong Kong. Their teenage minds haven't even matured and they haven't even stepped out into the real working world of adults and experience real world politics, yet they already gotten swept up by political fervor.
    5
  6233. USA and Russia are enemies, so if USA ally with India, then why would Russia be on same side as USA then?
    5
  6234.  @perrychrispy1  What misinformation did I said? Care to elaborate?
    5
  6235.  @MarkYeung1  Many of those Hong Kongers who left for Britain still retain the "colonial mentality". Those BNO VISA holders are not eligible for welfare benefits in Britain and they will have to live as second class citizens in a foreign land, which just goes to show how much the minds of many in Hong Kong remain colonized even till today.
    5
  6236.  @MarkYeung1  The Hong Kong National Security Law has been a long time coming. According to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 (香港基本法第二十三條) Hong Kong shall enact laws to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government (aka Beijing). So Beijing's actions are not in violation of Hong Kong Basic Law, instead they are fulfilling Article 23.
    5
  6237.  @MarkYeung1  More than 230,000 Hongkongers have applied for residence permits for China, Hong Kong's welfare minister Law Chi-kwong said... (Source: The Standard: People flee Hong Kong - and head north)
    5
  6238.  @China-bizvalueinstories  "But Shenzhou missed your point because he was not as humble as Pan," Some Chinese are humble (almost to a fault), but I'm not like those Chinese. That guy brought up how Chinese tourists lacking said virtues, and all I asked was for him to recount his encounter with said Chinese tourists that's all.
    5
  6239.  @cheezeeeboi8699  China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the rise and fall of numerous other nations and yet China has survived the oftentimes violent passage of time to modernity, while remaining relatively intact. It was through the crucible of time that Chinese virtues were forged and they form the basis of China as a civilization state today.
    5
  6240.  @michaelkatz275  Ukraine is a windfall for the Western military industrial complex, and the western politicians are unconcerned with rising inflation, food and gas prices that the ordinary Western citizen has to deal with.
    5
  6241. I've lost count of the number of times I've encountered such racist people and heard the same old excuse of "I'm not anti-China, I'm just anti-CPC."
    5
  6242.  @fanofyoutubers9792  Why should Chinese government be blamed for what happened in Wuhan. The virus mutation is a product of nature and new strains are always emerging anytime, anywhere. How is Chinese government to blame for an act of nature?
    5
  6243.  @Trust_but_Verify  You can visit Tiananmen Square (one of China's largest parade squares) in Beijing. The mausoleum of Chairman Mao, the founding father of the People's Republic of China can be found in Tiananmen Square.
    5
  6244. I agreed. Didn't Toyota had a number of car recalls because of faulty brakes, airbag issues and so on?
    5
  6245. Wave China's automotive industry is only about 30 years old, whereas Japan's has been around since prior to WW2 (about 80 years) So what makes you think that China's automotive industry will never take off?
    5
  6246.  @TacticalMayo  He's literally talking about 5,000 years of Chinese civilization, during the Yuan Dynasty long before the communists came to power in China.
    5
  6247. Hope Norway stays that way.
    5
  6248.  @ZMB-on5ub  The two terms (i.e "advanced" and "developing country") have different meanings. Being advanced means having access to high-end cutting edge technology, while being a developing country means that it fits certain criteria, such as a having a huge low-income population. It's entirely possible for a developing country to have advanced technology. For example, the Soviet Union was often considered not developed in Western eyes, yet the Soviet Union launched the world's first satellite, Sputnik, ahead of the West.
    5
  6249.  @Esquera123  "2. Huawei produces faster. It doesn't matter. What about quality? Is it good as Nvidia? Does it sell worldwide like Nvidia?" Nvidia doesn't even make its own chips, it depends on a company located in Taiwan, China to make them. Also, Huawei products are sold in more than 170 countries, from Mexico to France.
    5
  6250.  @Esquera123  China even built the world's largest hydroelectric power station, the Three Gorges Dam, to help provide clean, renewable hydroelectricity to our cities. China is also home to the world's 2nd largest hydroelectric power station, the Baihetan Dam. Together, this makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity. Countries by Hydroelectricity production 1. China (1303 TWh) 2. Brazil (428 TWh) 3. Canada (392 TWh) 4. United States (248 TWh) 5. Russia (197 TWh) 6. India (174 TWh) 7. Norway (134 TWh) 8. Vietnam (95 TWh) 9. Japan (74 TWh) 10. Sweden (69 TWh)
    5
  6251.  @lucaserwell5724  But does the common flu cause a patient to lose his/her sense of smell and taste, like Covid-19 does?
    5
  6252.  @gulamog5041  If you claim Taiwan is independent, then where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? If not, then since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    5
  6253. As a consequence of a one-party state, China's government can make 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 15-year plans, 20-year plans, to map out China's direction in the future, in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. Whereas American leaders have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only make short-term plans for America's future, instead of long-term plans, spanning say 10 years or more for the U.S.
    5
  6254.  @almondcaeser9587  Did you read what I wrote previously? By accepting the Hambantota Deal, the Sri Lankan government actually frees up their revenue from having to pay Chinese debts, so they can now spend the money elsewhere. Hambantota Port was leased to Chinese companies for 99 years for $1.2 billion, which means Sri Lankan government has freed $1.2 billion (instead of having to spend that amount paying off China). Also, once 99 years have passed, the lease would have expired, the port would be returned to Sri Lanka, and the debt considered repaid. So how is China responsible for Sri Lanka's economic woes? Could you please elaborate how China is to blame here?
    5
  6255.  @almondcaeser9587  So you've agreed that by accepting the 99-year lease, Sri Lankan government has freed itself from having to pay $1.2 billion in Chinese debt and can then spend that money elsewhere. Also, you claim Sri Lanka can pay off that amount of money in 1 year, then haven't you just proven that Sri Lanka isn't in a debt trap? Also, after 99 years, the lease would expire and the port would be returned back to Sri Lanka and the debt considered repaid, so how is China responsible for Sri Lanka's economic woes?
    5
  6256.  @almondcaeser9587  Also, earlier you wrote that the development of ports is an unnecessary project which can't generate any income. Now you're turning around and claiming that China can use that port for their thousands of ships of different countries travelling from Europe, both Americas and Africa to China which will generate hundreds of billions and maybe many trillions over the course of 99 years business. Aren't you contradicting your earlier words?
    5
  6257.  @almondcaeser9587  "神州 Shenzhou what kind of logic are you applying man?" Where is the flaw in my logic? By accepting the 99-year lease, Sri Lankan government has freed itself from having to pay $1.2 billion in Chinese debts, essentially freeing up the funds to spend elsewhere, so how is China responsible for Sri Lanka's economic woes? Sri Lanka actually have more money to spend elsewhere thanks to the Hambantota Deal. Also, after 99 years, the port will be returned to Sri Lanka after the lease has expired, and the debt considered repaid, so how is China responsible for Sri Lanka's economic woes?
    5
  6258.  @firmaith  So if the Chinese government were able to meet the so-called "low expectations" of Chinese compared to the U.S government being able to meet the "high expectations" of Americans, then like I said, China is more a democracy than the USA. Because Chinese expectations are met, whereas American expectations aren't. And while there are multiple definitions of democracy, democracy can be defined as the government being able to deliver what the citizens expect of it.
    5
  6259.  @firmaith  You said: "since elections are decided top-down," Elections in China are based on a hierarchical electoral system, whereby local People's Congresses are directly elected. All higher levels of People's Congresses up to the National People's Congress (NPC), the national legislature, are indirectly elected by the People's Congress of the level immediately below. Governors, mayors, and heads of counties, districts, townships and towns are in turn elected by the respective local People's Congresses. You said: "but there is no public mechanism to recall non/responsive politicians." The NPC literally has the power to remove the President of the People's Republic of China and other state officers from office. Elections and removals are decided by majority vote.
    5
  6260.  @firmaith  You said: "An actual quantification for democracy would be measured by objective standards such as the ability to effect an outcome." That's one definition of democracy, namely "procedural democracy" where as long as you follow the procedures, you think you are democratic. But it's no secret today that even though American citizens can change their leaders, the U.S government just isn't delivering what the Americans themselves want. Just like Trump for example, he was elected because he promised to make America great again, which he failed to deliver. Therefore, can you truly say that U.S is a democracy just because they followed the democratic procedures, but the government fails to deliver either way?
    5
  6261. Rational voices in the West regarding China is certainly in short supply in the West.
    5
  6262.  @nuwa1737  How is Communist Party of China suppressing Chinese culture? Look at the Hanfu Movement 汉服运动 in mainland China, and the people of Taiwan are ashamed to wear Hanfu in public, because it can be taken as sign of being pro-mainland.
    5
  6263.  @c450-v2b  Alexander missed a chance for alliteration. "Don't March on Moscow" should be followed by "Don't Bluff Beijing." It's such a coincidence that Russia and China's capitals start with M and B respectively.
    5
  6264.  @Andy-P  Since you brought up the U.K, Rishi Sunak was NOT voted in by the people of U.K, then does this imply that the UK is not a democracy?
    5
  6265.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou Indeed. That is the one china policy and America and most Taiwanese want to keep it that way." Thus, your remark to Mark Yeung that "Taiwan isn't part of China" has been proven false. "Keep the status quo. Keep the peace" But it's difficult when the US House of Representatives Speaker visited Taiwan island in an attempt to change the status quo.
    5
  6266.  @Andy-P  So British PM Rishi Sunak is NOT elected by the British? Then how can Britain be considered a democracy when their leader is unelected? On the other hand, Chinese President Xi Jinping was elected into his 3rd term.
    5
  6267.  @barryford1482  Anti-China sentiment is brewing in Australia, even though Australia is located closer to Asia than America and China is Australia's biggest trading partner. Yet Australian politicians like Scott Morrison are fanning the flames of anti-China sentiment in Australia, and following the US's anti-China stance against China.
    5
  6268.  @ronniechew6566  Zero sum game for the 1% of Americans, but for the remaining 99%, it's basically a lose-lose scenario.
    5
  6269.  @night6724  The U.S drone strike in Kabul killed 10 Afghan civilians (including women and children) and the Pentagon said the U.S General who ordered the drone strike did not break any law.
    5
  6270. Exactly. I see many people (presumably, Indians) like to bring up Hambantota port of Sri Lanka as an example of it being debt trap, having been turned over to China for 99 years. But once the 99 years are over, then the debt for the port would have been fully repaid and ownership would be returned to Sri Lanka. You have to look long term, in order to see the benefits these infrastructure bring to the table for these countries.
    5
  6271.  @ne0ge049  "神州 Shenzhou be quiet and go away." Was that your pathetic response every time I bring up US General Mark Milley's phonecall? If you really had a good response, you would have responded with it, instead telling others to "be quiet and go away."
    5
  6272.  @tom4486  If Cyrus was supposedly paid by the Communist Party of China to promote his peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" then honestly isn't that a good thing? The world would benefit immensely from continued peace and prosperity between the USA and ch, yet why are you guys giving him flak for such a positive message? Would you have preferred war between USA and China as the alternative?
    5
  6273.  @dflatt1783  Cyrus Janssen message is clear, that he wants continued peace between USA and China, so how's that considered selling his soul? The ones who sold their souls are the warmongers (like @NE0 GE0) who promote war instead of peace.
    5
  6274.  @Carbuncle0168  China's Quantum Computer SURPASSES Google youtu.be/WwxMgyubHUg
    5
  6275.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  "CCP shave the heads of Uyghur Muslims to make real hair wigs 🤑" If what you claim was really true, then we should be seeing more bald Uighur Muslims in Xinjiang, but where are the bald Uighurs?
    5
  6276.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  "It's like me talking about the illegal fishing of Chinese fishing fleets in the Galapagos. Everyone knows it happens, and it just gets old." United Kingdom and France have a fishing dispute that has threatened to degenerate into a full-blown trade war, virtually every fishing nation in the world has such fishing disputes.
    5
  6277.  @aryaman05  200 million in investment is far below the nearly 20 billion deal that Foxconn withdrew from India's Vedanta. In May, even Taiwan-based iPhone maker Winston is quiting India.
    5
  6278. China has invited Taiwan to join China under the "One-Country,Two systems" policy just like Hong Kong and Macau. That way, Taiwan can keep their own government, and China can keep ours. But Taiwan rejected the offer and is yet to offer a counterproposal of its own.
    5
  6279. China recently gifted Philippines with large shipment of guns and rifles (including sniper rifle) in order to help Philippine authorities combat the many armed extremist groups hiding out in Philippine islands. USA stopped selling weapons to Philippines after questioning Duterte's hard-handed policies regarding dealing with drug offenders. Drug addiction has been major problem plaguing Philippines for decades and only Filipinos know that force is needed to handle this problem. Like Westerner saying: "Sometimes you have to break a few eggs to make omelette"
    5
  6280.  @billyehh  You said: "It is about the arrogant and dismissive way diplomats from China treat their hosts." Have you heard how America's so-called "diplomats" like Anthony Blinken, Jake Sullivan and John Kirby talk about China? It's precisely the kind of Wolf Warrior Diplomacy that you attribute Chinese politicians to, that's being exhibited by these US "diplomats".
    5
  6281. I won't be surprised if they are indeed behind this attack. If anything, Brian's channel has taught me that the U.S is oftentimes far more involved in many events, that it appears to be on the surface.
    5
  6282. China lockdown Wuhan, USA says "No Human Rights!" Meanwhile, Covid-19 ravages unchecked across the USA, China says: "No Human Left…"
    5
  6283.  @alexloong6396  "神州 Shenzhou not the same thing, you can post your photos everywhere, it is ok. but no one else can use your photo the same way." Who's to stop people using your photos that you post online without your permission? There are websites that search the Internet for people's photos and compile them together, who's to say no one can use your photos without your permission?
    5
  6284.  @soegiartonugroho  "神州 Shenzhou every country has different law. As long as you obey their law when you are there, you're safe." Poor African American, George Floyd obeyed the American police instructions to lie down on the road while an officer knelt on his neck, now he's dead. Are you sure that as long as you obey their law, you are safe?
    5
  6285. "How exactly do we let the people who know how to govern govern?" Look at the leader's history and what's he's done for the country. For example, President Xi Jinping has about 30-40 years of experience which is why most Chinese people feel safe with him in charge. But people like US President Trump has zero experience, yet you expect him to lead your country? You are charting a course of a country of 1.4 billion people (300 million for USA) so won't you want a reliable leader at the helm? "Who judges whether someone is capable of governing well and what happens if a leader does not govern well?" China has long history of good leaders and bad leaders. Good leaders are allowed to remain in power, whereas tyrants are eventually overthrown by peaseant rebellions and uprising. This is known in the West as the "Mandate of Heaven" and basically, it means a good leader is allowed to remain in power, while a bad leader will be eventually overthrown and it has guided China for 3000 years. If President Xi Jinping is doing good for China, then personally, I see nothing wrong with leaving him in power, in order to maximise the benefits to China. President Xi is willing to tackle the corruption in the communist party (something few leaders are willing to do) and its not easy to come across another leader willing to tackle corruption.
    5
  6286.  @vtr279  Paid off? The U.S. wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Pakistan have cost American taxpayers $6.4 trillion ($6,400,000,000,000) since they began in 2001. Source: America has spent $6.4 trillion on wars in the Middle East and Asia since 2001, a new study says (cnbc.com/2019/11/20/us-spent-6point4-trillion-on-middle-east-wars-since-2001-study.html ) The report, from Watson Institute of International and Public Affairs at Brown University, also finds that more than 801,000 people have died as a direct result of fighting. How exactly has US wars paid off?
    5
  6287.  The Snurger  Hitler demonised the Jews (antisemitism) so if China was truly behaving like Nazi Germany, we should be seeing discrimination against ethnic minorities. But ethnic minorities in China enjoy special privileges over Han, such as tax exemption, free education, priority in healthcare and education advantages. For example, if applying for a university course, if Han applicant requires 600 points to qualify, then ethnic minority applicant needs only 300 points (easier to apply) for the same university course. So how is China behaving like Nazi Germany?
    5
  6288.  @blitz12399  Habitat for humanity is one of those US NGOs who claim to be non-profit yet they have clearly taken sides since the Ukraine war. How reliable is their data about 150,000 homes in Russia becoming uninhabitable each year?
    5
  6289.  @blitz12399  You've watched a lot of videos about Russia, but have you actually been to Russia and seen what life is like there for yourself? Those Soviet style houses were built to provide housing for people in Russia during its worst periods of wartime. But Russian cities have improved greatly, there are people who visited Moscow and remarked on how clean the streets were and how developed the city is.
    5
  6290. Its not Change-4 Probe, its Chang'Er 4 probe.
    5
  6291. +explosives101 It was Mongolian Kublai Khan who choose to abandon his Mongolian ways and to proclaim himself emperor of Yuan Dynasty China. Otherwise, why not call China as Mongol Empire, instead of Yuan Dynasty China? And the current Mongolian government are always welcome to try and conquer China like they did in the past. Mongolians don't know nuts about ruling an empire as large as China. -Who grows all the food to feed the empire? Mongolians are nomadic tribesmen, living off the land, so Han Chinese farmers grew the food to feed the empire. -Who plans all the villages, the towns and cities? Mongolians live in temporary huts, called yurts, so Han Chinese builders built the houses, the roads, the infrastructure. -Who runs the daily affairs of the empire? Mongolians know nothing about bureaucracy, so Han Chinese bureaucrats kept the empire running smoothly -Who cultivates the languages, the arts and science? Mongolians? Nope. Han Poets develop calligraphy, Han craftsman made vases made of porcelain (precious china) and silk clothing (Hanfu) and Han astronomers predicted solar eclipses and recorded celestial phenomena like supernovae. The Mongolians only know how to invade other countries, steal other peoples crops and loot, burn villages and towns and destroy priceless works of art, and aren't interested in developing a civilization like Han China is.
    5
  6292.  @bingdd168  Don't other countries also have this same issue of elderly refusing to get vaccinated? Whichever country you look at, there are always older people who refuse vaccination, either for medical reasons or out of fear of the vaccine. Obviously governments could have done more to educate the elderly, but there will always be a lingering amount of elderly folk refusing vaccines.
    5
  6293. The Economist: "Taiwan is the most dangerous place on Earth" Also 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2022, and China's economy is still going strong.
    5
  6294. ​ @Hamayou2007  I quoted a survey that's all, how's that considered making fun of a country's entire generation?
    5
  6295.  @MarkYeung1  According to Statista: What Do You Want to be When You Grow Up? Becoming an astronaut has seemingly lost some of its glamor, at least in the United States and the United Kingdom, where children are three times more likely to want to be a social media influencer than to jet off into space. In China, the opposite is true, with more than half (56 percent) of 8 to 12-year-olds saying that they would most like to become an astronaut when they grow up and only 18 percent an influencer.
    5
  6296.  @abhishekgonchowdhury7775  India has one of the worst rates of child malnutrition in the world, with one third of malnourished children globally being Indian. Although India's infant mortality rates have improved over the past three decades, it still lags behind much of Asia.
    5
  6297. Actually, many countries have threaten impose trade sanctions on Chinese goods, or to even boycott Chinese goods altogether. But in the end, demand for Chinese goods remains high and the threats aren't carried out. Chinese workers make products like smartphones, computers, appliances, clothing, sneakers and etc, cheap, so that the cost of living in other countries kept low and reasonable. Think of the millions of dollars people saved over the years, thanks to access to affordable Chinese goods.
    5
  6298.  @MarkYeung1  Previously, Taiwan experienced great economic growth (i.e "Taiwan Miracle" 台湾奇迹) while under the authoritarian single-party KMT rule. Between 1952 and 1982, economic growth was on average 8.7 percent, and between 1983 and 1986 at 6.9 percent. The gross national product grew by 360 percent between 1965 and 1986. All this was achieved while Taiwan was under authoritarian KMT rule. However, after democracy was introduced to Taiwan, Taiwan's economic growth has become more modest. Taiwan's economy is stagnating today, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, youth unemployment is rising, and Taiwan graduates are seeking employment opportunities overseas, in the mainland or in places like Singapore.
    5
  6299. Chinese investors legally paid cash for those Australian real estate and property, and it's your country's choice to offer up your lands for sale to Chinese. But it does not mean China is obliged to to sell our property to foreigners under their own name. Your country, your laws. Our country, our laws. Why blame China for having better property laws than your country?
    5
  6300. ​ @rogerstarkey5390  So it appears you're able to see through the lies that's being peddled about China in the media. But when it comes Russia, you seem to believe what that same media says about the state of Russian economy and society?
    5
  6301.  @joshkooga7204  Mao Zedong wasn't entirely aware of the dire conditions during the famine. The local provincial governments deliberately exaggerated crop yields to Mao, and when he personally inspected the crop fields, the local government had workers transplant stalks from dying fields to healthy fields to give the appearance of a bumper harvest to Mao. So Mao thought there was surplus grain for China to export and pay off the machinery imports from the Soviet Union.
    5
  6302.  @evangiles17  "Australia doesn't chose sides - They weren't there to protect the chinese the chinese aren't citizens of the soloman's" Those Chinese that were attacked in the Chinatown in Solomon Islands are citizens of the Solomons, why are you claiming they aren't?
    5
  6303.  @bartonlee3594  You asked: "So all those Evergrande 'homeowners' whose homes are paid for but will never be built are...homeowners?" What makes you claim those homes will never be built? Evergrande has resumed construction in around 95% of its projects across China. Evergrande has resumed work at 734 developments in all of China as of March 27, including 424 projects recovering to normal construction levels, according to a post on Saturday on the official WeChat of the developer's Pearl River Delta business unit. So it's rather presumptious of you to assume that those Evergrande 'homeowners' whose homes are paid for will never be built.
    5
  6304.  @jp95js  President Xi Jinping actually made an offer to extend the 1 Country, 2 Systems Policy (1C2S) to include Taiwan. This means that Taiwan gets to keep their elections and democratically elected government, as long as Taiwan agrees to be fully considered as part of China, while Beijing and the mainland keep our own government. This shows that CPC doesn't necessarily have to rule Taipei, had Taiwan just accepted the 1C2S policy. But Taiwan President actually reject this offer and did not offer a counter proposal of their own.
    5
  6305.  @jp95js  You said: "The People in Hong Kong are Chinese . They call themselves Hong Kongers and they despise the CCP. They also consider you mainlanders as the Children of the Cultural Revolution because you have a reputation of spitting everywhere when you visit the city, you shout and talk loudly all the time, you push and shove rather than line up properly ." Have these Hong Kong people listened to the way they speak Cantonese in public? Shouting loudly, almost as if they were having a public argument? In Hong Kong, I have spoke Mandarin before, and some Hong Kong people treated me coldy, but as soon as I open my mouth and speak English, many Hong Kong people started warming up to me. It's this "colonial mindset" that afflicts some people of Hong Kong, to see themselves as a class above mainland Chinese.
    5
  6306.  @jp95js  You said: "I also know that the Vietnamese in spite of having a large Chinese community in their Country for many generations do not like them as well." Many Vietnamese nationalists forgotten what the Communist Party of China did for Vietnam Independence from France. During the First Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons (ranging from artillery guns (24 of such were used at the Battle of Dien Bien Phu) to rifles and machine-guns), ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla force with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help Vietnam fight for independence. From 1950 to 1954 the Chinese government shipped goods, materials, and medicine worth $43 billion (in 2019 dollars) to Vietnam. From 1950 to 1956 the Chinese government shipped to Vietnam: -155,000 small arms, -58 million rounds of ammunition, -4,630 artillery pieces, -1,080,000 artillery shells, -840,000 hand grenades, -1,400,000 uniforms, -1,200 vehicles, -14,000 tons of food, -26,000 tons of fuel. ... Source: Wikipedia: First Indochina War Yet many Vietnamese nationalists conveniently forgotten what China did for Vietnam independence, some Vietnamese even claimed that they won their independence all by themselves, forgetting the aid that China sent them.
    5
  6307.  @zilun  What "unrestricted warfare" are you talking about? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country (since our last major war in 1979). Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, etc, building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, power stations, dams, ports, airports, etc. Whereas the USA is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing those countries and cutting off those countries heads (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now it seems Assad of Syria and Maduro of Venezuela are next on the list.
    5
  6308.  @yslee1401  No, I meant it's a kind of Stockholm Syndrome. The people living in former colonies like Singapore, India, Philippines, (and even Hong Kong) have come to view their colonial masters as superior, so much such they even after the colonizers left, some of the local people's minds remain enslaved and loyal to their former colonial masters. It's a kind of "mental colonization", and even after decolonization, the minds of the people also need to undergo decolonization.
    5
  6309. China had Spain a list of approved Chinese suppliers, but Spain choose to buy from unapproved Chinese company, Bioeasy, that wasn't on the list. So why blame China when Spain choose to buy purchase from unapproved Chinese company that's not on the list?
    5
  6310.  @rambotolero2042  Even America is dependent on China for almost 80% of its medicines, which is especially important given the current situation. Fox Business reports that according to FDA estimate at least 80 percent of active ingredients found in all of America’s medicine come from abroad, primarily from China. And it’s not just the ingredients, China wants to become the world’s dominant generic drug maker. So far Chinese companies are making generic for everything from high blood pressure to chemotherapy drugs. 90 percent of America’s prescriptions are for generic drugs. Source: U.S. is Dependent on China for Almost 80% of Its Medicine saraacarter.com/u-s-is-dependent-on-china-for-almost-80-of-its-medicine/
    5
  6311.  @jacwi8719  "All people from around the world, dude! Can't you see that everything happens in the US are throughly discussed, debated and checked, etc etc by media from all over the world?" Then why is USA waging wars in the Middle East? After 9/11, the former President Bush had suspected Iraq of harbouring Weapons of Mass Destruction, but after the invasion of Iraq, no evidence of WMDs were found in Iraq. The UN General Secretary Kofi Ahnan even called the invasion of Iraq illegal and violated UN charter. Source: Iraq war was illegal and breached UN charter, says Annan theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/16/iraq.iraq Yet, the USA can continue invading countries with impunity, how's that keeping the USA in check? (PS: You never explained how you arrived at the conclusion that I thought all those things about China, Russia, Arab countries that you thought I think.)
    5
  6312.  @jacwi8719  You said: "Why you keep saying USA is keeping China in check?" Didn't you yourself say earlier that USA poses an obstacle to China? And to answer how USA is keeping China in check, USA has over 400+ overseas military bases in Japan, South Korea, Philippines, etc surrounding China, not to mention Trump slapping tarrifs on China in an attempt to halt China's rise. It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set, and many economists firmly believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's some time in the foreseeable future. Source: China to overtake US as world's biggest economy by 2028, report predicts theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/26/china-to-overtake-us-as-worlds-biggest-economy-by-2028-report-predicts
    5
  6313.  @jacwi8719  You said: "China doesn't even allow foreign journalists entering the country." Source: US issues new visa restrictions for Chinese journalists thehill.com/policy/international/china/496942-us-issues-new-visa-restrictions-for-chinese-journalists The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced that Chinese journalists working for non-American news outlets would be able to obtain only 90-day work visas, a reversal from the open-ended visas for which they’d previously qualified. The journalists will be able to apply for 90-day extensions.
    5
  6314.  @dinesh50448  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    5
  6315.  @jacwi8719  "神州 Shenzhou China that poses USA as a big obstacle for their agenda, idiot. Not US." So what do you think is China's agenda? China's agenda is the eventual rejuvenation of the Chinese civilization after centuries of humiliation at the hands of foreigners. Britain was colonial superpower during 19th century but was eventually overtaken by USA in 20th century. But prior to that, China (and also India) had been economic superpower for 1800 years and we made up 25% of the world's GDP share, according to world leading British economist, Angus Maddison. Source: Global distribution of GDP among China, India, Western Europe, USA, Middle East from 1 AD to 2003 AD wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA_Middle_East.png And judging from the above trend, it looks as though China is all set to dominate the 21st century. The USA wants to retain their global hegemonic rule that's why they are doing whatever it takes to slow down China's growth whether it's through trade war, tech war, or possible active military war.
    5
  6316.  @jacwi8719  About Intellectual Property, China applies for more patents than any other country in the world and we also have the world's largest number of granted patents, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators. Patent applications for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (1,542,002 patents) 2. United States (597,141 patents) 3. Japan (313,567 patents) 4. South Korea (209,992 patents) 5. European Patent Office (174,397 patents) 6. Germany (67,898 patents) ... Source: World Intellectual Property Indicators wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Indicators#Patents Patent grants for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (432,147 patents) 2. United States (307,759 patents) 3. Japan (194,525 patents) 4. European Patent Office (127,603 patents) 5. South Korea (119,012 patents) 6. Russian Federation (35,774 patents) ...
    5
  6317.  @jacwi8719  "Keep dreaming, dude. It's just a forecast." Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html
    5
  6318.  @dinesh50448  Indians love Chinese smartphone brands, here are the Top Smartphone Brands in India. These are the top smartphone brands in India Nov 2020 1. Samsung (South Korean) 2. Xiaomi (Chinese) 3. Vivo (Chinese) 4. Realme (Chinese) 5. Oppo (Chinese) 6. Apple (American) 7. OnePlus (Chinese) …… Source: Gadgets Now: India's No. 1 Tech Site India is world's largest democracy, but where are the famous companies from India as compared to China?
    5
  6319.  @dinesh50448  Besides smartphones, Chinese companies also dominate the civilian drone industry and Chinese company DJI is world's largest civilian drone-maker according to the following source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 top10drone.com/top-drone-companies/ But where are the famous companies from India as compared to China? India is world's largest democracy, yet where are the famous companies from India?
    5
  6320.  @dinesh50448  Besides smartphones, China is home to many successful Internet companies like Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, Suning.com, Bytedance (Tik Tok), Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, Kuaishou, Trip.com, Pinduoduo, Sina Corp, Sohu, and numerous Internet companies. Source: List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies#List India is world's largest democracy, but where are all the famous companies from India as compared to China?
    5
  6321.  @dinesh50448  China signed a "No-First-Use" policy in 1964 regarding nuclear regarding nuclear weapons, which means that China will not use nuclear weapons against another country, unless we are ourselves attacked with nukes first. Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/No_first_use However, the USA signed no such treaty and can preemptively launch a nuclear strike against any country with impunity. So if there is to be a nuclear war, China won't be the one starting it.
    5
  6322.  @valuedcustomer8922  China's horrific handling? China lockdown Wuhan and built a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised (youtu.be/l2QfufpwfdY ). China also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. (youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk ) But Westerners just laugh at China's misfortune, calling those hospitals "concentration camps" and doing nothing to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores.
    5
  6323. Compared to English, Chinese language is more compact. Chinese sentences are oftentimes 1/3 the length of an English sentence. Chinese characters can be written left-to-right, right-to-left, horizontal or vertical (just think about the way neon signs in Hong Kong display Chinese characters) More compact means more information in less space, if given just 8 syllables, you can squeeze more information in Chinese than in English.
    5
  6324.  @Legacy241  Here's a video entitled: Tibet: The Truth by Monarex Hollywood about the slavery in Tibet under the Dalai Lama rule. YouTube will prompt you that this video is offensive and inappropriate. Video: TIBET - The Truth [Chinese subtitles] HD youtu.be/Wvo8MXny5XI (Warning: Footage may be offensive or inappropriate for some viewers) Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: White Terror (Taiwan) wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Terror_(Taiwan) But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Source: Taiwan Miracle wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_Miracle Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Today, Taiwan's economy is in a slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving the island and seeking employment opportunities abroad in places such as Singapore and mainland China. You're the one who constantly thinks the absolute worst of China no matter what, you constantly s**t on China's achievements and mock Chinese infrastructure and so on. You're just anti-China that's all, because you can't stand to see China succeed.
    5
  6325.  @NoComplience  The point is that despite what the headlines said, it wasn't happening then and neither is it now happening. You're always welcome to write the next Western headline for 2024, but rest assured that China's economic growth will continue regardless of what the Western headlines claim.
    5
  6326.  @NoComplience  Foreign investment flows into China increased to CNY 580.19 billion in January-August of 2024 from around CNY 500 billion in the previous period. (according to Trading Economics)
    5
  6327.  @lorellaldos5263  With the US Chip restrictions in place, Chinese companies like Alibaba and Tencent will eventually have to look to locally produced chips for AI. Huawei has emerged as a possible alternative, having released a smartphone equipped with advanced 7nm chips made by SMIC.
    5
  6328.  @laserraiset3300  If those top quality German tools last for generations, then how are those companies expected to turn a profit?
    5
  6329.  @martinbelfort5113  In 22nd century, it depends on whether India can wake themselves up.
    5
  6330. The U.S universities have become surveilance grounds for the U.S government to keep an eye on Chinese living in USA. A recent study conducted by the University of Arizona and the Committee of 100, an organization of prominent Chinese Americans, surveyed scientists of both Chinese and non-Chinese descent working at academic institutions in the United States on issues of race and ethnicity in science and research. Around half of the Chinese scientists surveyed — including some American citizens — said they felt they were being surveilled by the U.S. government.
    5
  6331. According to Wikipedia: Electric car use by country As of December 2017, China had the largest stock of Plug-in Electric Vehicles (PEVs) surpassing even USA and Europe. China also dominates the world in electric bus stocks with 99.5% of the world's electric bus stocks in 2016.
    5
  6332.  @harryflashman4542  Precisely! Yavlinsky and Navalny have each gotten single digit approval, compared to the overwhelming approval that Putin enjoys.
    5
  6333.  @Faceless-Patriote  You asked: "Anyway, why is this great, wealthy and prosperous Nation like China, still disputing some rugged mountainous, inhabited piece of land?" China has 14 land neighbors which is the most number of land neighbors in the world (tied with Russia) and China patiently sit down one-to-one with each neighbor to discuss and settle border dispute -In 1915, Tajikistan and China signed border treaty -In 1960, Myanmar and China signed border treaty -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed border treaty -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed border treaty -In 1963, Nepal and China signed border treaty -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border treaty -In 1964, North Korea and China signed border treaty -In 1991, Soviet Union and China signed border treaty -In 1992, Laos and China signed border treaty -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border treaty -In 1996, Kyrgyzstan and China signed border treaty -In 1999, Vietnam and China signed border treaty ... Yet, China has yet to sign a border treaty with Bhutan and India. Mind you, China had 25 rounds of border talks with Bhutan, yet failed to settle our border dispute. Even though China has settled border disputes with every other neighbor (apart from India, of whom we had 30 rounds of border talks!) Tell me who is really delaying resolving the border dispute here? China tried 25 times to talk with Bhutan, yet failed to arrive at a solution to the border (even though China has succeeded with other neighbors) so who's the one creating problems here?
    5
  6334.  @PSmith-f1u  "Western standards of desires and ambitions do not apply for a nation like Bhutan." We aren't talking about the West though. We are talking about Pascal's message of the Rise of Asia, and Bhutan is hardly the country to lead Asia's rise. Because everybody knows it's China that's behind Asia's rise, and Bhutan has hardly any interactions with China, so how is Bhutan qualified to lead the way, when it refuses to ride on the wave.
    5
  6335.  @ashokjain8449  You mentioned "ICJ rulings on the South China Sea." But what International Court of Justice ruling are you talking about? It the arbitration tribunal was by the Permanent Court of Arbitration which is non-UN agency that shares the same office space in the Hague as the ICJ. But the two organisations are unrelated.
    5
  6336.  @ashokjain8449  How did China allow transmission of the virus? China even lockdown international flights from Wuhan, so why are you accusing China of deliberately spreading the coronavirus? Source: No international commercial passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since lockdown: Airport authority news.cgtn.com/news/2020-07-11/No-international-passenger-flights-departed-from-Wuhan-since-lockdown-S2T0tDumyc/index.html Except for chartered flights, no international passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since its lockdown on January 23, People's Daily learned exclusively from the Hubei Airport Group Company on Thursday. The fact refutes the scandalous accusations from White House trade advisor Peter Navarro, who said China was "preventing domestic travel from Wuhan to Beijing or Shanghai, locking down their transportation network," but "sent hundreds of thousands of Chinese nationals around the world to 'seed' the virus" in a recent interview.
    5
  6337.  @tjena5772  You said: "it's a country to be liked or dislike." Yes, but since you clearly dislike China, then why pretend to like China? Contrary to your beliefs, many people in China actually support the Communist Party of China in poverty alleviation and modernizing China and innovating for the future. You're not even Chinese yourself, you're just trying to sow discord among Chinese people.
    5
  6338.  @tjena5772  What makes you think Chinese people aren't free or being controlled by the government? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationthailand.com/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    5
  6339.  @tjena5772  I'm not going to determine what you like or dislike, but if you clearly dislike China, then why pretend to like China when you don't? I already shown that the Permanent Court of Arbitration is not an official UN agency unlike the International Court of Justice, it only shares the same office space in the Hague. Source: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1989486/united-nations-stresses-separation-hague-tribunal
    5
  6340.  @ashokjain8449  About IPRs, China applies for more patents than any other country in the world and we also have the world's largest number of granted patents, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators. Patent applications for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (1,542,002 patents) 2. United States (597,141 patents) 3. Japan (313,567 patents) 4. South Korea (209,992 patents) 5. European Patent Office (174,397 patents) 6. Germany (67,898 patents) ... Source: World Intellectual Property Indicators wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Indicators#Patents Patent grants for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (432,147 patents) 2. United States (307,759 patents) 3. Japan (194,525 patents) 4. European Patent Office (127,603 patents) 5. South Korea (119,012 patents) 6. Russian Federation (35,774 patents) ...
    5
  6341.  @tjena5772  Like Cyrus Janssen said, Chinese system is certainly not perfect, but it clearly works for China. If Western democracy doesn't seem to work for India, then why not try out another form of government? You can criticise India, but does it improve? Because China's political system is constantly improving, even as we speak. Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    5
  6342. China also launched the world's first quantum satellite in 2016 that is said to be "unhackable" due to quantum encryption. The quantum "entanglement" effect is when two particles can influence each others states, seemingly regardless of amount of distance between them. The longest record on Earth was between particles that are 143 KM apart, but China has smashed that record by showing that entanglement works at distances above the stratosphere, enabling two stations over 1,200 KM apart to communicate with each other, according to the following source. Video: youtube(dot)com/watch?v=4QlcKuxDGrs
    5
  6343. Not true. Saudi Arabia has expressed support for China's fight against terrorism. Source: Saudi crown prince defends China's right to fight terrorism aljazeera.com/news/2019/02/saudi-crown-prince-defends-china-fight-terrorism-190223104647149.html "China has the right to take anti-terrorism and de-extremism measures to safeguard national security," Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman said to President Xi Jinping.
    5
  6344.  @rap3208  Tiananmen Square Massacre, it's a myth indeed.
    5
  6345. +Lemni Skate Chinese have PLA troops in Pakistan to protect construction of our roads and infrastructure there. CPEC is extremely costly project, and the government wants protect our investments from terrorists and possible sabotage is all. China does not claim Bhutan as part of our territory. Unlike Tibet, Bhutan had no history of being under the suzerainty of China, instead being under British suzerainty during the British Raj, India doesn't claim Doklam/Donglong area as part of its territory, so how does building infrastructure in the disputed area threaten Indian sovereignty at all? But by sending troops there, they are entering Chinese territory uninvited. Bhutan claims Doklam as part of its territory, but hasn't shown any official proof to verify its claims, so how why does India just support Bhutan claims like that? Our government has at least produced maps, and 1890 agreement to support our claims, unlike Bhutanese government. Why does India give Bhutan the benefit of the doubt then?
    5
  6346.  @NotYourChannel23  Well, Cyrus' videos have the message of Building Bridges, Not Walls between the US and China. So if you're saying that the CPC loves this peaceful message, doesn't that me China supports cooperation not confrontation?
    5
  6347.  @ShinobiShaman  "Hey, if you made it there that long without getting imprisoned or executed, you did okay my man." If you want to talk about prison populations, then America has the world's largest prison population. So statistically speaking, one is more likely to end up imprisoned in the US than in China.
    5
  6348.  @yawokyere8416  Russia's and China's rise are bringing about a tectonic shift in geopolitics, facilitating a transition towards a more multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (i.e the U.S's).
    5
  6349. In a poll of nearly 7500 readers by the United Daily News website, 61 percent said the trip was “not welcome” as it “may destabilise the Taiwan Strait”. Only 38 percent welcomed the visit and said it had “more advantages than disadvantages”.
    5
  6350. I disagree with your suggestion that the Communist Party of China should change their name. China today is following "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics" where China is in the primary stage of socialism and needed to engage in economic growth before pursuing a more egalitarian form of socialism, with the eventual goal being communism (as described in Marxist orthodoxy). Communism is a goal that Communists in China want to work towards, changing the name means changing China's eventual goal.
    5
  6351. Actually, there are significant numbers of people from Taiwan migrating to the mainland to find work and live here. The mainland is a bigger market with more opportunities after all.
    5
  6352.    "神州 Shenzhou your official facts are garbage!" Why can't refute you refute my points? Since you disagree with my statistics then where's your verified source showing the true figures? Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself?
    5
  6353. Many Asian Americans live under the stigma of the "perpetual foreigner" stereotype, even though they have been born and raised in America their entire life. They spend much of their time trying to fit in with white American culture, only to face rejection by some.
    5
  6354. It's sad that those US politicians have been elected into power by majority of American citizens. Meaning that majority of Americans chose those same politicians.
    5
  6355.  @dimsumden5745  Exactly, the digital RMB rollout in the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics will help showcase China's advanced digital payment infrastructure to the world, giving athletes and visitors the chance to compare China's digital payment systems with their own country's back home.
    5
  6356. Politics should be about doing what's right, not necessarily what's popular. Sometimes, the popular thing may not be right, and the right thing may not be popular. Democracy is only doing what's popular, not necessarily what's right.
    5
  6357. ​ @FMR------------------psst  Besides inventing gunpowder, Chinese also invented handcannons, handgrenades, fragmentation bombs, landmines, naval mines, exploding cannonballs, rocket launchers, multi-launch rocket systems and of course, fireworks. Americans celebrate the 4th of July with Chinese fireworks, and there was even an ancient Chinese flamethrower capable of launching continuous stream of flame (the first of its kind) which must have been a fearsome sight to behold in the ancient battlefield. Video: Ancient Chinese Flamethrower youtube.com/watch?v=goi-FVnTD5Y&t=915
    5
  6358.  @FMR------------------psst  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has seen the rise and fall of other empires, and survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Roman Republic fell apart and fragmented into individual countries. China has always been under authoritarian rule (and we still are today) so why should China adopt Western democracy? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to succeed and China is living proof of this.
    5
  6359. Seems like the Western MSM has caught on to this, and they are featuring news articles going after the expats living in China, and painting them as influencers allegedly paid by the communist party.
    5
  6360. Demchok has a village Dêmqog 典角 under Chinese administration, and there is demand improve and open road linking China and India through Demchok. Chinese government is simply building the bridge to enable allow Indian pilgrims to cross stream on their way to Lake Manasarovar, which is sacred site of pilgrimage. Source: Wikipedia: Demjok
    5
  6361.  @MarkYeung1  You claim that media has a bias problem, then why is it when you switch from NYT about China to CGTN about USA, you've replaced "fear" with "hate"? Clearly, this is not a fair comparison and you've introduced your own prejudice into the equation during the switch. Then why claim it's a problem of media in general when you're deliberately tipping the scales against China in your comparison?
    5
  6362.  @stopwarstop7334  "神州 Shenzhou China is at peace?" China is currently at peace, which country is China currently at war with, you tell me?
    5
  6363.  @stopwarstop7334  But are China and India currently at war? When was war declared? If not, then clearly China is currently at peace and not at war with any country. Our People's Liberation Army hasn't had any actual combat experience since our last conflict in 1979.
    5
  6364.  @basshunterdota625  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    5
  6365. It's a combination of the “Red Scare” (fear of communism) and the “Yellow Peril” (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so thoroughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    5
  6366.  @saltytroye3838  If you want to talk about jailing people, then it's actually the United States has the world's largest prison population. As for Mao's red book and Xi Jinping Thought, what's wrong with getting to know how Chinese leaders think? Don't people also want to read Henry Kissinger's books?
    5
  6367.  @DoACarl  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like _roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    5
  6368.  @noelborbon6155  The same can be said of any corporate-owned Western MSM journalist from BBC, CNN, etc, it's the corporations that pay those journalists. The difference is that Andy Boreham is actually in Shanghai, whereas those Western MSM journalists are basically reporting from their own countries.
    5
  6369. Wow. Exactly how many languages do you speak, Cyrus?
    5
  6370.  @zackk4969  I searched for "Chloe Zhao & Oscar" and Baidu returned 334,000 revelant results (百度为您找到相关结果约334,000个) so what are you talking about?
    5
  6371.  @zackk4969  Did you actually bothered to do the search on Baidu yourself, before accusing Baidu of being a liar?
    5
  6372.  @zackk4969  Where does it say that "A Madman's Diary" 《狂人日記》 is based on a true story?
    5
  6373.  @zackk4969  蓬佩奥:我们撒谎欺骗偷窃 还将这些称作美国荣耀。
    5
  6374.  @zackk4969  《狂人日记》是鲁迅的一篇虚构作品短篇作品。
    5
  6375. Canada and United States stole the territory of North America from the Native Americans and occupy them even till today.
    5
  6376. Throughout history, human societies have always gravitated towards authoritarianism and oligarchies. Political power was concentrated not in the hands of many, but in the hands of the few, such as nobles (aristocracy) priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy) or other forms. Such political systems were popular because they were stable and they worked! The elites were oftentimes well-educated and politically savvy to make decisions regarding the country's future, while the ignorant masses were kept far away from politics. Whereas, democracy has long history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, even Republic of Rome fell. Those proto-democracies failed and democracy wasn't popular elsewhere outside of Greece. Even modern Western democracy has a history of 100-200 years and it doesn't necessarily mean that it will be successful in future.
    5
  6377.  @chungusultimate  Even if you claim that Israel did not intentionally target civilians, that doesn't mean that civilians weren't killed by crossfire from the IDF.
    5
  6378.  @chungusultimate  You claim Yasmin Porat is one specific story, well in that case I can also claim that your story is just anecdotal. And like I said, what we need is a truly independent neutral investigation into the events occurring on Oct 7 in order to find out the real truth.
    5
  6379.  @chungusultimate  Looks like you're now resorting to hurling personal insults against me for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours? I provided data to substantiate my case, you just laugh and dismiss it, while claiming "Trust me, I was there!" as though your anecdotal evidence somehow trumps all others. You claim Yasmin Porat is only one story, then the same thing applies to you. You're only one story as well.
    5
  6380.  @chungusultimate  Let me ask you this question, since you think Israel is great. Do you believe that cutting off water, food, electricity and fuel supplies to Gaza is considered a criminal act?
    5
  6381. "Don't underestimate Biden's ability to f**k things up!" - Barack Obama (allegedly)
    5
  6382.  @johanhirte9661  "神州 Shenzhou But 30% of Xinjiang cotton is harvested by hand." 30% is clearly the minority, compared to 70% machine harvest cotton, and it doesn't show that there is forced labour until you can factually prove it yourself. As shown through the difference between the way H&M, Adidas, Nike, Uniqlo, etc deal with the allegations of forced labour, compared to Sketchers actually hiring private investigators, you can't just assume that the 30% are forced labour until you have actual proof.
    5
  6383.  @johanhirte9661  Why are you bringing up the year 1958, instead of the present? I've already used Sketchers as an example that it's entirely possible for clothing companies to conduct audits into their cotton sources from Xinjiang, you can't refute my points so you bring up events from 60 years ago?
    5
  6384.  @johanhirte9661  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    5
  6385. Park Minje You say massacre? Then how many people died, as compared to US wars in Middle East? Also, China is invading which country during that event?
    5
  6386. Oliver Stone interviewed Medvedchuk in his 2019 Ukraine documentary, Revealing Ukraine (available on YT) and he and his wife seem determined to make their country better, after what Western powers did to de-industrialize Ukraine.
    5
  6387.  @mandarinandthetenrings2201  So you're saying Saudi Arabia is demanding China give a huge discount if we deal with them in our own currency?
    5
  6388. Durtete fought to rid the Philippines of its colonial occupation by removing the US bases. Marcos is reversing this.
    5
  6389.  @monicagomez4616  The goal of Checkers is to clear the board of opponent pieces (i.e wipe out the enemy completely). The goal of Chess is to checkmate the opponent's king (i.e take out their leadership). The goal of Go (Weiqi) is to slowly and patiently build up assets to tip the balance of the game in one's favour.
    5
  6390.  @regntonne  What has your question even got to do with China and Ukraine?
    5
  6391. Both Singapore and China actually have a lot more in common than Singapore and USA. Singapore and China both curb freedom of speech, and even though Singapore is "democratic", it has been ruled its entire life by a single party, PAP, for 50+ years. Similarly, China has been governed by the communist party since the PRC's founding in 1949, 60+ years ago. But this does not necessarily mean that this is bad thing. When a party is in power for a long-term, they can make long-term plans to benefit the country, unlike in America, where each candidate can only run for president for 4-8 years maximum. That means the US presidents only make short term plans lasting less than a decade, since that is the term of their presidency. For example, the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) has been in the works by Obama administration for about 8 years, but after Trump took office, he cancelled TPP and thus, all those taxpayers money spent on planning just go down the drain.
    5
  6392. Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. Here is compiled list of what Western journalists have to say about China's economy 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. But its already 2019, and China's economy is still going strong. Why continue to believe Western propaganda about China when Western economists predictions have been consistently proven wrong for almost 30 years?
    5
  6393.  @jcjko5504  I find that Cyrus Janssen's channel is quite informative, and he does bring in guests during interviews from time to time, to share their personal experiences of China and their expertise. I believe we need more of such videos to help promote a better understanding of China to Western audiences.
    5
  6394.  obimk1  What Uighur genocide? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    5
  6395.  @profflux  Take Africa for example, in the late 1950s, China signed bilateral trade agreements with Algeria, Egypt, Guinea, Somalia, Morocco, and Sudan. Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai made a ten-country tour of Africa between December 1963 and January 1964, where he visited Ghana and established close relations with Kwame Nkrumah, who desired a united Africa. Relations at that time often reflected China's foreign policy in general.
    5
  6396.  @fuemoua8345  Why can't China be in the South China Sea? USA is the one sending their aircraft carriers and warships halfway across the globe to the South China Sea waters, why don't you tell USA to get out of SCS?
    5
  6397. Do you actually have her post of being sexually assaulted? Peng Shuai has appeared on video call and she want's to have her privacy respected, then when will Western media learn to respect Chinese athlete's privacy?
    5
  6398.  @fl338  You said: "All the while you live in the US and also had your children registered as US citizens" Well, since Cyrus is an American citizen, lives in the U.S, and had his children registered as US citizens, then isn't it better if Cyrus concentrate on improving his own country? I mean, China is for the Chinese ourselves to improve, but since Cyrus is a U.S citizen, then it's obvious that he cannot change another country like China. But he can change America. That's why Cyrus' videos are all about the message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" between the U.S and China.
    5
  6399.  Naikomi  Again, I previously quoted a Credit Suisse Wealth Report: There Are More Poor People In America Than China there's an entire article about how to a reasonable level of accuracy there’s no one in China in the bottom 10% of the world’s population by wealth. And yet there’s some 10% of those global poor in North America, and another 20% or so in Europe. So, yes, it really is true that there’re more poor people in America (and Europe) than there are in China.
    5
  6400.  Naikomi  We've already established that living expenses in China is (generally) lower than in Germany. Food especially, you can just go out into the streets at night and enjoy cheap, delicious, filling food to fill your stomachs, but poor people in Germany do not have such a luxury. Because over time, the high cost of living slowly drains a person's savings over time. Video: Living on $1 Chinese Street Food for 24 Hours https://youtu.be/GMH6_WX5YS0
    5
  6401. +Parm Mohan The last campaign fought at the end of WWII was when the Russians invaded Japanese controlled territory of Manchuria, and cause Japan to surrender. So its fair to say that Soviet Union ended WWII, not the USA. The USA did not even invade the Japanese mainland at all.
    5
  6402.  @JohnSmith-hz7te  America is actually dependent on China for almost 80% of its medicines, which is especially important given the current situation. Fox Business reports that according to FDA estimate at least 80 percent of active ingredients found in all of America’s medicine come from abroad, primarily from China. And it’s not just the ingredients, China wants to become the world’s dominant generic drug maker. So far Chinese companies are making generic for everything from high blood pressure to chemotherapy drugs. 90 percent of America’s prescriptions are for generic drugs. Source: U.S. is Dependent on China for Almost 80% of Its Medicine saraacarter.com/u-s-is-dependent-on-china-for-almost-80-of-its-medicine/
    5
  6403.  @stunningandbrave2520  "Therefore completely failing" China has transformed from a previously dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, how's that failing?
    5
  6404.  @stunningandbrave2520  What downward trajectory? The Chinese economy expanded by 6.3% year-on-year in Q2 2023, showing faster growth compared to the 4.5% recorded in Q1.
    5
  6405. CurtW1962 You didn't really answer my previous question about how having industrial robots "bring jobs" back to America.
    5
  6406.  @currentchannel3452  You claim Cyrus is somehow being paid by China to promote his peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" then isn't that a positive message for the world?
    5
  6407.  @joeburns88  What makes you think China is a closed society? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your lands and spending money on your economies. Your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, ZTE, Vivo, Lenovo, etc are expanding overseas and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. So what makes you think China is a closed society? Chinese people can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population.
    5
  6408. Japan's foreign policy can be summed up as USA is the big boss of the world. UK and other Western countries are managers of the big boss in different branches of the world. Japan is the manager appointed by USA for its branch in Asia, and Japan has to bow and show respect to its big boss, yet they can boss around other Asian countries like China and Japan, as long as Japan under the protection of their big boss.
    5
  6409.  @namelesssnitchy  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty China and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Source: Map of Yuan Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/04/yuan.jpg Source: Map of Qing Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/06/f114660d2bf5452994135c4c.gif
    5
  6410. Jeffrey Sachs is also a very perspicacious American.
    5
  6411.  @cchannel7857  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According to Gregory Clark, all available eyewitness present inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    5
  6412.  @cchannel7857  Search for an article: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies (By Gregory Clark)
    5
  6413.  @hkfoo3333  But I've heard many times when Cyrus expressed his own personal view that Russia "started" this war, and that Putin is to blame. While I agree with Cyrus views regarding China, I disagree with him regarding Russia-Ukraine war.
    5
  6414.  @beastmode8203  "神州 Shenzhou that's a lie." It's not outside the realm of possibility. Think about it, if Taiwan's semiconductor manufacturing technology relocates to the U.S, then Taiwan is no longer important enough for the U.S to defend should conflict break out in the Taiwan Strait, and therefore, this will only invariably speed up the reunification process.
    5
  6415.  @s-man5647  China is literally Philippines' biggest trading partner (according to the World Bank). Had money been the motivation alone, then Philippines should be in China's paycheck, not the US's. But that's clearly not the case, the Philippines continue to regard the West highly, while looking down on China. You said: "Pinoys aren't victims of colonial mentality.They just happen to have friends and family in the US.." You'll have to ask yourself "How did they come to have friends and family in the US?" Because Philippine became a US colony, after losing the American-Philippine War (in which some 250,000 Filipino civilians were killed). Once it became a colony, then the colonial mentality will inevitably exist among the Filipino people. Whereas China had never colonized Philippines, therefore there's no colonial mentality of Filipinos towards Chinese.
    5
  6416.  @s-man5647  "You never explained what it means to have a colonized mind," Colonial mentality is an internalized perception of ethnic and cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization. Such people tend to view the culture of their colonizers as inherently superior to that of others (including their own). This mindset was brought about when the colonizer instills their values into the local people through education systems and media, and even after the colonizer leaves, the people's minds remain "colonized" and loyal to their former masters. It's a form of mental slavery (like Stockholm Syndrome).
    5
  6417.  @s-man5647  "It is not simply because Filipinos love America too much. Filipinos minds are not so small that they cannot hold esteem for both America and China." Again, that's why we need to investigate where this inherent love of America comes from. It comes from the fact that Philippines became American colony (after losing the American-Philippine War) and because of that, some Filipinos became American citizens, and therefore, it ensures the continued existence of the colonial mentality, long after Philippine independence.
    5
  6418.  @comradetirer  Mariupol is about 90% taken, and the last remnants of the Azov Battalion are held up in a factory complex. It's only a matter of time before Mariupol eventually gets liberated by the Russian forces.
    5
  6419.  @ahkiet99  Who do you think is qualified to govern the country? The People or The Government? If you select The People that for what reason do countries need The Government for, if people can govern themselves?
    5
  6420. Humans are approaching the physical limit of just how small we can manufacture silicon-based chips. However, carbon-based chips shows promising results, being more efficient and requiring less power than silicon-based chips. If China's investment in carbon-based chips matures, it could potentially allow China to leap frog TMSC in chip production.
    5
  6421.  @martinlaoshi  You said: "China was not one of those 5 countries but abstained and did not vote against or for the resolution." That's what I said, I said: "Those that abstained or voted in support of Russia include China, India, Pakistan, etc" I'm not sure if the meaning of this sentence is clear, but those who either abstained or voted in support of Russia include China, India, Pakistan and others. You said: "It's all on public record, it's the UN after all, but keep making things up in your own little fantasy world." What fantasy world are you talking about? I clearly said that those who abstained or voted in support of Russia include China, India, Pakistan, etc, so what exactly have I made up?
    5
  6422.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou The root source of the conflict is not Kyiv." Kiev supported Ukrainian ultra-nationalist neo nazis like the Azov Battalion, so Russia is getting to the root of the problem, just like how France and Britain attacked Germany instead of just limiting the fighting to Poland
    5
  6423.  @brexitgreens  So you've been previously spamming comments yourself, yet you deleted them, and then turn around and accuse me of spamming? When my comments were me responding to your (now deleted) comments? Also, you've repeatedly accused me of going off-topic and derailing the thread, but JaYoe Nation topic is that "it's important to see ALL sides of an issue in order to have an impression of the whole", so how am I going off-topic? I only posted 1 comment to JaYoe Nation, but others kept throwing accusations at me so all I'm doing is responding to accusations that's all.
    5
  6424.  @martinlaoshi  For all your various analogies, they don't apply perfectly to the real world. Your perfect analogies may exist in a fantasy world of your creation, but the matter of the fact is that those who abstained from voting in the UN against Russia are deemed to be in the same camp as those who voted in support of Russia. No matter how you phrase it, those who abstained are perceived to be not condemning Russia for their military operation, by those that do. In an ideal world, the options A, B, C will all have their distinct characteristics (as you have outlined). But in the real world, the options B and C are regarded as the same, in the UN general assembly. Abstaining from the vote is regarded the same as not condemning Russia's military intervention. That's why the USA is coming after China (and possibly India) and slapping sanctions against our country, even though China abstained. In your ideal fantasy world, China choosing Option C (abstaining) should have no consequences isn't it? But we aren't seeing this reflected in reality, because USA is treating China as though it have chosen Option B instead of C, that's why I grouped the two categories together, because that's how reality is. ... I mean, even you at one point admitted that that the act of abstaining itself is not taking a position against the US, yet China abstaining and not taking a position against the US (in your own words) would "obviously be absurd." So you've basically dismantled your own argument, because China abstained, yet is being regarded as taking a position against the US.
    5
  6425.  @Harthorn  If you want to do business in China, then you are expected to obey China's laws while in China and respect the country you are doing business with. For example, if your company support anti-gay protests, then gay customers will boycott your brand. If your company support anti-semitism, then Jews will boycott your brand. So if your company support anti-China protests (like the NBA for example) then naturally, Chinese customers will boycott your brand. I mean, why should Chinese people continue buy and support a company that is anti-China you tell me? Nobody force those companies to do business with China.
    5
  6426.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  About Education in China, As of 2013, China has also become a top destination for international students, ranking 3rd in the world, according to Institute of International Education. Source: China ranks 3rd among countries that host the most international students, IIE reports usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/2013/10/08/explore-the-worlds-top-universities China is also the most popular destination in Asia for international students, surpassing other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, India, Singapore, etc in sheer number of international students.
    5
  6427. Here's an analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Crimea had opted to rejoin the father. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they still gave Ukraine a false sense of hope. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    5
  6428.  David Leija  What article is that? Chinese smartphone brands like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Vivo, Lenovo, Oppo, etc are rising and & dominating* the 2019 Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands according to the following source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html It almost sounds like USA don't want Chinese smartphone brands to succeed that's all.
    5
  6429. I also recommend George Galloway and the Mother Of All Talk Shows (MOATS).
    5
  6430.  @MarkYeung1  Hu Xijin is entitled to his own beliefs, but was he really a witness present inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 itself? According to Jay Matthews, reporter for The Washington Post as far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night and all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. Source: The Myth of Tiananmen And the price of a passive press (By Jay Mathews) archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php
    5
  6431.  @ryannverano6452  Look at Phillipines coastguard (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) shooting to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng (洪石成). But which Filipino fishermen been shot by Chinese coastguard? None!
    5
  6432.  @tl4172  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours.
    5
  6433.  @tl4172  In 2002, China had 0 km hi-speed rail track, but in 2019, China has over 38,207 km of high-speed railway track, (more than double the rest of the world combined!) Video: High-Speed Railway (HSR) Construction by Country (1965-2019) youtu.be/zkMnxJF22O8?list=PLZR7QFDVc72MMo7fUAT-IwpV08Ngb6L3D&t=120s Countries by High-Speed Railway Track 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. France (3,870 km) 4. Germany (3,596 km) 5. Japan (3,422 km) 6. Russia (2,026 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,997 km) 8. Italy (1,697 km) 9. South Korea (1,481 km) 10. Finland (744 km)
    5
  6434. I hope that Eileen Gu not only inspires more Chinese athletes to take up winter sports here in China, but to also inspire oversea Chinese and people of Chinese descent to be proud of their motherland.
    5
  6435. +Chad Leach If you look at the government, the older hardcore communist party members are slowly retiring and dying off, and the younger newer generations of CPC members are educated (many with Western degrees). China's change is slow and steady, not abruptly, like when Trump became president of USA. For example, President Obama was working on Trans Pacific Partnership for 8 years, then when Trump took over, he cancelled TPP because he doesn't like Obama (Obama humiliated Trump with his birth certificate) So all those taxpayers money in TPP all went down the drain because of sudden changes to governance like Trump coming to power. As for foreigners in China, remember that China is world's most populous country. We are already somewhat overpopulated, so why is there a need to accept more foreigners as citizens at the moment? To China, the rest of the world is severely underpopulated, so China doesn't see much wrong with foreigners leaving China. Only rich Chinese leaving China pose a concern for the CPC, because it means China's wealth is leaving with them. This sounds harsh, but you have to look at this from China's perspective, not from foreigner perspective. If you are foreigner in China, you are expected to obey China's laws. The government also realized that fossil fuels are polluting China, and are taking steps to slowly ban coal power plants in possibly 2018. Coal fuel burns dirty and is responsible for much of China's smog, even in Hong Kong, so China is slowly reducing coal imports to reduce oversupply of power from coal and switch to renewable energy sources instead. China poised to ban new coal-fired power stations afr.com/news/china-poised-to-ban-new-coalfired-power-stations-20160711-gq3izc
    5
  6436. China has 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, to chart China's course towards the future. By abolishing the term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. Whereas in the US, their presidents have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only make short-term plans for America, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more.
    5
  6437. Because the system is stacked against him.
    5
  6438. So that human being can work in higher-paying jobs.
    5
  6439. USA is controlling the seas, so that's why China is building overland trade route instead, so that we can continue trade with other countries without pesky US interference.
    5
  6440.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Russia drove its tank units all the way to Kiev at the start of this war and was rebuffed." Because there were ongoing peace talks between Ukraine and Russia at that time, and Putin choose to withdraw its forces from Kiev as a goodwill gesture to create favorable conditions for peace negotiations, according to Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov.
    5
  6441.  @Redfvvg  You said: "China still does not have real scientific traditions and schools." About education in China, China has become a top destination for international students and as of 2013, China was the most popular country in Asia for international students and ranked third overall among countries. China is now the leading destination globally for Anglophone African students and is host of the second largest international students population in the world. There were 17 Chinese universities on lists of the global top 200 behind only the United States and the United Kingdom in terms of the overall representation in the 2023 Aggregate Ranking of Top Universities.
    5
  6442.  @Redfvvg  "Shenzhou. As a Chinese, you probably don't know this, but pride is one of the Christian sins." Indeed! The sheer hubris of people who outright proclaim that "China still does not have real scientific traditions and schools", (even after being shown China's education accolades) just goes to how conceited some people can be.
    5
  6443. It's a combination of the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-Asian sentiment in the West today.
    5
  6444. Exactly. He said: "Look at China, look at Russia, they are just issuing statements, they are just condemning,..." .... Meanwhile, Turkey continues to allow oil to pass through its territory into Israel.
    5
  6445. LinkedIn failed in China, because they are unable to understand the Chinese customer's mindset. Like Richard said, LinkedIn only have 50 million accounts compared to Alibaba having 800 million, so LinkedIn decided to withdraw from China. Just like Google left China because they lost the majority market share to Chinese competitor Baidu, after Baidu introduced several innovative features and services that Google did not offer on it's search engine.
    5
  6446. Well said. In my opinion, U.S immigration laws are too loose, and any foreigner who has family member or relative who is American Citizen, is themselves applicable for U.S. citizenship. That's why many Muslims, Asians, and Hispanic marry Americans for citizenship, so that they can bring their whole families over to America. And not all these immigrants will become productive members of American society. Whereas China is world's most populous country and its possible that not enough resources for everyone in China, so we should only admit the minimum number of immigrants and no more than absolutely necessary. We should grant priority Chinese citizenship to valuable foreigners like doctors, lawyers, engineers, scientists, businessmen, technopreneurs, etc and lower priority citizenship to refugees, drunks, dead-beats, drug addicts, dissidents, troublemakers, sex tourists, human traffickers, pedophiles, etc. Other countries are always welcome to receive these less valuable immigrants, but keep them away from China please.
    5
  6447. How is China dangerous? China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major war in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, etc, even in the 21st century. The USA is enacting regime change by cutting off those country's heads (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Ghaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now, the countries at risk are Assad Regime of Syria and Maduro of Venezuela. Even the supreme leader of Iran is possible target for the USA to enact regime change. Therefore, isn't United States the more dangerous power here?
    5
  6448. There's more to warfare than just numbers and statistics. Look at USA losing the Vietnam War to poorly trained Vietcong farmers. Look at USA spending 16 years fighting wars in Middle East against small numbers of insurgents.
    5
  6449.  @everythingandmore5537  China is developing medical exoskeletons to help paraplegics regain the use of their legs. Video: China-made exoskeleton robot gives hope to paraplegics youtu.be/3_o8nthlIIA
    5
  6450. Matt M. I have provided ample various reasons behind my opinion. But you apparently, just overlook the fake enthusiasm they have for China and insist that I should just blindly follow your opinion.
    5
  6451. Matt M. You clearly said: "Just show some empathy towards them..." and "Be happy about it" didn't you, so how aren't you imposing your opinion on mine?
    5
  6452. Matt M. This comment thread has (as of now) 19 comments, so when was it 30 comments ago?
    5
  6453. If Taiwan people want to visit their families in mainland for CNY reunion, then why not take Chinese airlines? Or travel by ferry and take railway.
    5
  6454. @Sheriff Lobo You said: "Look at the Coca Codo Sinclair dam. The Chinese helped build it, it works at about 50% capacity." Ecuador has a cycle of wet and dry seasons, and the Coca Codo Sinclair Dam (largest energy project in Ecuador) achieves maximum capacity during the monsoon season. Dams do not operate at full capacity all the time, because once you reach full capacity, the dam needs to release floodwaters else risk breaking apart. You said: "Gwadar Port in Pakistan is another great example of Chinese cooperation. Sure it's barely used.... but it's built." At the present time, there isn't much traffic around Gwadar Port, but as China's Belt and Road Initiative starts connecting more countries, Gwadar Port will most likely see greater traffic in the future. You said: "The US aren't building these things." Yes, the USA would rather bomb countries than build infrastructure.
    5
  6455. Great to see that you've corrected your pronunciation of Sri Lanka after your earlier video about the country. It's a good idea to run unfamiliar word through Google Translate (or any word pronunciation software) before making a video about it.
    5
  6456. Britain was a superpower in 19th century and was overtaken by USA in 20th century. But prior to that, China and India were superpowers for 1800 years. So how is it a waste of time to attempt to retake top position? If you do nothing, then nothing will change, and the Westerners will continue to step all over your countries.
    5
  6457. According to the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family, South Korean prostitutes numbered about 330,000 in 2002. In 2013, the Ministry estimated that about 500,000 women worked in the national sex industry. The Korean Feminist Association estimates the actual number may exceed one million. There is no mention of Chinese prostitutes, but isn't it shameful if your country has to illegally import foreign sex workers from Philippines to supplement the demand, just so that South Korea can continue to enjoy US military protection?
    4
  6458. +bob robertson Thank you for understanding. If you notice, this is basically China's first overseas naval base, and as far as I know, China is opening up the bases for emergency landings or disaster relief if needed.
    4
  6459. +Norwegian733 French forces and American forces lost during the 1st and 2nd Indochina wars too. Are they just as weak? The Vietnamese had acquired Soviet and Chinese weapons during war and used it against China. China had promised to support N.Korea in gratitude for their contribution to the Communist victory after the Chinese civil war. If anything, N.Korea is still around to serve as a possible buffer against S.Korea but the S.Koreans hated the US for installing Park Chung-hee as president.
    4
  6460. China is effectively telling South Korea to pick a side, USA or China. N. Korea is so close to S. Korea that THAAD doesn't have much appreciative value to S. Koreans. It's coverage doesn't even extend to cover Seoul.
    4
  6461. You are correct in that Kanji has meaning behind it. For Example, from the Chinese point of view: 子 -> Child, 老 -> Elder, 文 -> Culture, Child supporting Elder -> 孝 means Filial (good to parents) Elder talking to Child about Culture -> 教 means Teach 木 -> tree, 爫 -> represents a hand above so 采 means pick up (pluck vegetables) But some Chinese words use sounds to represent the word. For example 采 is called Cai. Vegetables is also called Cai so we add 艹 which means grass to form 菜 . In Kanji, vegetables also uses 菜 but is pronouced Sai instead as in Yasai. In short, some Kanji have meanings behind them while others are based on Chinese pronunciations. It depends on how the word originated.
    4
  6462. We should shake off this inferior complex imposed on us by Westerners. China has 5000 years history and is one of world's oldest continuous civilization. Of the Four Great Civilizations, Only China remains while the others (Mesopotamia, Egyptians and Greeks) have long since faded to history. Why should we let others dictate what they want from us? Chinese have shown to be among most intelligent and diligent peoples in world. China is home to many inventions like paper, gunpowder compass etc, which have contributed significantly to rest of world. Our written language been continuously in used since 1200 BC, and still alive and evolving today. Chinese people should see ourselves capable of accomplishing equally impressive feats as Westerners and put ourselves on equal footing with them. We should definitely not sell ourselves short of what we capable of.
    4
  6463. Who said entire Chinese history is defined by Han Chinese alone? Chinese people 中國人 consists of Han 漢, Manchu 满族, Mongol 蒙古族, and over 50 other ethnic minority. You confuse Chinese people = Han People alone, when Chinese people = People living in China. Jurchens were once distinct, but when they conquered China as Manchu, they assimilated their culture into China as well. Chinese culture also evolved to wear Manchu clothing etc, and Chinese traditional clothing now reflects this. Remember, it is Mongol ruler decision to call China, Yuan Dynasty, instead of Mongolia, and also Manchu ruler decision call China Qing dynasty, instead of Manchuria. You are American right? So African Americans, Asian Americans and Latin Americans also considered American people, am I right? Its not just Americans = Caucasian Americans. Same thing with Chinese.
    4
  6464. Apollon Lv If you have nothing to contribute, then why insult other people's mother? Chinese culture by definition is mixture of different cultures and dialects and they all contribute to Chinese culture in some way. Today Chinese tradition costume follow Manchu clothing, because it was part of our history. Do we kick Manchu people out of China today because they not Chinese? No we don't.
    4
  6465. But you contribute nothing to discussion at all. You claim "Goguryeo is obviously history of Korea" but don't provide any evidence back up your claim at all. All you do is call Chinese people delusional all day long and insult people's mother
    4
  6466. Adapting to changing circumstances should be seen as good thing. No alliance is permanent in the global scene and each country chooses alliances that benefits itself best. What would conflict between USA and China achieve in the world? We should instead work together on joint issues (such as N. Korea) to provide a win-win situation that benefits all parties.
    4
  6467. +Aaron Glicco China and Philippines had enjoyed good relations prior to this dispute. China did not invade the Philippines like Imperial Japan, and there are many joint interactions between Philippines and China.
    4
  6468. Sadly, Racial stereotypes are still common in world. Asians usually perceived as easy prey, that don't fight back. Look at how United Airlines personnel pulled Asian man (who is also doctor) off of his seat (according what I know, he paid fairly for the seat as well). Many people surprised that he screamed and put up fight initially, since people usually believe Asians are docile and compliant. But we are human beings too. Imagine if it was Caucasian or African person (maybe even Hispanic) being pulled off instead. The United Airlines personnel would probably think twice before pulling people of such races off. Anyway, this not entirely related to this abduction, but is perception of Asians in general.
    4
  6469. Sebeki 2 Our government may not perfect, but it has ruled for longer duration than communist Russia and brought about great prosperity these 30 years. It is true that Tiananmen protest occurred but it was long ago and since then, there's been almost no democratic protest in China.
    4
  6470. You have to look into the regional politics. For example supposedly China decides to invade Taiwan, S.Korea and Japan might simply see Chinese killing Chinese. These two countries dislike Chinese and would rather they finish it quickly so that they can resume trading with the victor. Joining Taiwan means that they effectively declared that they recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state. If supposedly China invades Japan, S. Korea may not send help because S.Korea was once under Japanese rule for 30+ years. N.Korea is also poised to invade S.Korea if they try anything funny. If N.Korea invades then S.Korea will be more interested in fighting N.Korea then sending aid. Taiwan was under Japanese occupation for 50+ years so no one knows whether it will join Japan. Will the Japanese even trust Taiwanese help at all since they are also Chinese? China could play on the divided conflicts between the nations. Lastly, if China supposedly invades S.Korea then similar things as above could happen. East Asia is like a chess board filled with pieces pointed at one another. Will the US even bother to send its navy across the Pacific? When Russia invaded Ukraine, all the US did was impose sanctions. I know I am overly simplifying things but if you never know what Asians are up to when they go to war. Its not a simple "who has more allies" sort of scenario. =)
    4
  6471. These reporters seem rather disapproving of the idea. China has a history of building architectural marvels like the Grand Canal and the Great Wall. Even if this idea is eventually proven to be unfeasible now, technology may one day make such a feat possible.
    4
  6472. If there's going to be a nuclear war, then everyone's dicks will be useless since the whole planet is doomed already.
    4
  6473.  @gklkjuhylpoiuyuiojhjklkjuh9976  Chinese characters constitute the oldest continuously used system of writing in the world, having been used since 1200 BCE and today, Mandarin Chinese is the most spoken language in the world by number of speakers. Whereas other ancient scripts like Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia) Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered dead languages today, since they are no longer evolving with the times and no new words being added into their vocabulary. Source: Chinese characters wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_characters
    4
  6474.  @venkatramakkineni  Can anyone truly memorise all the English words? I mean, every single English word, from the scientific names of every animal and plant species, to new words being created as a result of slang and so on? People learning memorise terms that are commonly as well as those who are relevant to their daily life. No one is expecting you to memorise every single Chinese character. So how would you define "practicality" then? Today, Mandarin Chinese is actually the world's most spoken language by number of speakers which is testament to its practicality and Chinese characters constitute arguably the oldest continuously used system of writing in the world, having been used since 1200 BCE, whereas other ancient scripts like Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia) Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered dead languages today, since they are no longer evolving with the times and no new words being added into their vocabulary.
    4
  6475. +whatfreedom7 As a Chinese, I would also personally advise Americans not to trust China fully. Every country is promoting the interests of their own country, just like Trump's "America first" slogan. I got nothing against Americans wanting to improve their country, but it would be better to focus on improving domestic issues like repealing/replacing Obamacare instead of policing the world. Just my opinion is all~ +Ste U.K So if China is Trump's puppet, then why did Trump emerged praising China and not labeling us currency manipulators? Or Trump even not commenting on Taiwan or the South China Sea issues? These were the issues that threatened US-China relationships, but now they seem to off the radar, which is to China's benefit.
    4
  6476. +Pedro But why USA and Allied powers choose to get involved in Korean Civil War in first place? It was internal war and should be decided by Koreans themselves, not USA or China. At the time of Korea's division, North Korea was actually faring better off economically than South Korea, who had political instability and economic crises. That was why N. K almost conquered S. K, but was stopped because of USA intervention in Korean civil war. N. Korea's problem today stems from the fact that it is still at war with USA, and because of that, it is unable to do business with other countries because of US. In 2016, it was revealed that N. Korea approached the US about conducting formal peace talks to formally end the war. Simply put, Korea would probably be much different if USA did not join the war against N. Korea. Reunified Korea by the North would not be in the situation today, because it would be free to trade as it was not at war with USA. Also, why are you so rude and keep calling Chinese by racist slurs? I do not insult you and use derogatory terms against you.
    4
  6477. In my opinion, a alphabetical system doesn't make words like Xiang, Qi, Cuo, She, etc. anymore easier to pronounce. Chinese language is short and tonal so an alphabet wouldn't make it more efficient. Without an alphabet, characters can have their own pronunciations. For example, 女 is Nu (Mandarin), Neuih (Cantonese), Neng (Teochew), Ng (Hakka) and even Onna (Japanese). 女 means woman by the way.
    4
  6478. + Kazzantra Exactly, romanized Chinese characters only give information (albeit, a poor approximation) on how to pronounce a character. The original characters focus on preserving the meaning instead of the pronunciation. Modern technology has also made Chinese easier to type than English. I had to type every letter out in this paragraph while in Chinese it would be typing a few letters and selecting the correct word. +Captain Davy Very interesting. Compared to Portuguese, Chinese also has those markers " ` ´ ^ ~ " which we call "tones" to distinguish between sounds. So you also have to pay attention to the way a word is pronounced in Portuguese? Spoken Chinese (normally Mandarin) has only 4 tones while Cantonese (a dialect of Chinese) has up to 9 tones.
    4
  6479.  @rksleung  Many Indians (but not all) tend to retain the "colonial mentality" of worshipping their previous colonial masters, while harboring a disdain for any "non-white" culture (including their own). The China-India border was drawn by a British, Henry McMahon, without regard to previous historical boundaries between India and China, and yet till today, India still insist on the McMahon Line instead of returning to the historical border lines.
    4
  6480. Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongolians conquered Tibet and Song Dynasty China, and incorporated them into Yuan dynasty China.
    4
  6481.  @garam6555  "神州 Shenzhou the status quo is taiwan is taiwan," Wrong, the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. And the status quo is what the majority of the people of Taiwan prefer. Declaring formal independence would be considered changing the status quo and that's not what the majority of the people of Taiwan prefer. You said: "world knows that prc plays a game called 'change your constitution and we won't bomb you' so taiwan doesn't change constitution." Well if anything, you've just shown that Taiwan clear isn't independent they can't change their constitution without the Communist Party of China, and you've just demonstrated that Beijing controls Taipei after all. Also, you mentioned Taiwan's spirit and savvy innovation but where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? Besides smartphones, Chinese companies also dominate the civilian drone industry and Chinese company DJI is world's largest civilian drone-maker. Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (Chinese) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: _Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 But where are the examples of innovation in Taiwan as compared to the mainland?
    4
  6482.  @cba4389  If Taiwan island is a "free nation" then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there something controlling Taiwan and stopping them from joining the UN?
    4
  6483.  SS3 Super  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    4
  6484.  @elanor2123  "神州 Shenzhou Regarding your last point, I think u understood what I was saying but are pretending u interpreted it in a different way." You had said: "Communism has never yielded a good result in terms of economy in Europe." and I'm merely proving your statement wrong. Before the 1912, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe at that time, but after the Communist Revolution by the Bolsheviks, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe during its heyday, both militarily as well as economic, since the Soviet Union was the world's 2nd largest economy from 1960 to 1985, only just behind the United States at number one. So clearly, the communist ideology transformed one of Europe's poorest into it's strongest economy and that's why Western Europeans felt threatened by Soviet Union rising might, so how can you claim it has never yielded a good result in terms of economy in Europe? You said: "You did not mention how and why communist countries such as the USSR ended. They collapsed, and the after effects were always mostly bad..affecting the people for generations." That's because communist ideology was eventually abandoned in the Soviet Union and that lead to the collapse of the USSR. The after effects of the USSR collapse were indeed mostly bad, and apart from Russia, the mortality rates of former Soviet Union states were significantly higher than those in Western Europe. Male life expectancy in Russia fell from 63 years in 1990 to 58 in 2000, and rose again to 62 years in 2009. Female life expectancy in Russia has remained fairly steady. It was 74 years in 1990, dipped to 72 in 2000, and rose back to 74 years in 2009. Belarus and Ukraine also saw a drop in male life expectancy. In Belarus it fell from 66 years in 1990 to 64 in 2009 and in Ukraine it declined from 65 years in 1990 to 62 in 2009. Kazakhstan is the former Soviet republic with the lowest life expectancy, falling from 61 years to 59 over the same period. And mind you, this was after the fall of the Soviet Union, so how can you blame communism for the after effects suffered by countries that have abandoned the ideology? You said: "Communism and socialism may prove effective in the shorter terms, but it's process isn't pretty and sooner or later it collapses," There's still countries that support communism and socialist ideology, like the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the Republic of Cuba, and of course, the People's Republic of China. And in China's case, China has survived long after the fall of the Soviet Union, and still continues to improve everyday.
    4
  6485.  @albertmaziarz6739  If Putin had really fled with his tail between his legs back to Russia, then why is it that 4 Oblasts (Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporiza, Kherson) have been liberated and voted to join the Russian Federation?
    4
  6486.  @GuyWhoLikesTheSnarkies1435  "神州 Shenzhou Indonesia still has long way to go" As the world's 4th most populous country, Indonesia certainly has the potential to train more STEM graduates. Indonesian government just needs more investment in education and opportunities.
    4
  6487.  @phlei95014  As the world's most populous country, China has an enormous student population, so the competition for top schools and higher education in China is very fierce and intense. China's National College Exam, (Gaokao 高考) is very competitive, and as a result, some Chinese students may not qualify for local university, so they may choose to study abroad (especially if their parents have the $$$). That's why many Western universities host Chinese International Students who weren't able to qualify for local university.
    4
  6488. Peng Shuai is trying to lay low and avoid the public eye for a while until this all blows over, and she has expressed her desire for personal privacy during a video call with IOC. But the WTA is trying to pry into her personal affairs and demanding she appear in public and bare her private life for all the world to see.
    4
  6489. Why isn't America spraying disinfectants along the streets? Every affected in the world, developed or less-developed, are spraying disinfectants, but USA doesn't seem to be doing this, despite being the epicentre.
    4
  6490. +Young Tang Americans also stole a lot of Germany technology after WW2. At the start of the war, American tanks were inferior to German tanks, but after Germany's surrender, American absorbed German Panzer (tank) technologies and American tanks became much more powerful afterwards. The Nazi airforce (Luftwaffe) had very successful aircraft designs that were copied by American Airforce after the war. Even Nazi V2 Rocket scientists were put to work on NASA's Moon Landings. One of the greatest ripoffs of all time was the theft of German patents after WW2 wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/patents.html
    4
  6491. Huawei overtook Apple as world's 2nd largest smartphone maker, only behind Samsung at number 1. So the USA want's to curb Huawei's growth by using spying as an excuse to target Huawei.
    4
  6492.  @jimwu9121  In the West. I told Westerners that China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    4
  6493.  @truenorthstrongandfree3699  You asked: "How else can you explain over 100,000 transplants being carried out in China in 2020 with no apparent successful organ donation program?" Where did you get your figure of over 100,000 organ transplants in 2020? According to official data, there were 19,454 organ transplants in China in 2019, so where did you get your figure of over 100,000 transplants in 2020? According to World Health Organization, there are roughly 100,800 organ transplants taking place every year throughout the globe, yet you claim China performed more organ transplants than the rest of the world? Did you get your number from Ethan Gutmann, a member of the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation?
    4
  6494.  @larrysmith2123  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Taiwan's economy has since stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising.
    4
  6495.  @larrysmith2123  After the Korean War, South Korea was actually dirt-poor under democracy with GDP lower than sub-saharan African countries. It was under South Korean dictator, Park Chung-hee that brought prosperity to the South Korea. When he came to power in 1961, South Korea's per capita income was only US$72.00 and North Korea was the greater economic and military power on the peninsula. One of Park's main goals was to end the poverty of South Korea, and lift the country up from being a Third World economy to a First World economy via etatist methods. Using the Soviet Union and its Five Year Plans as a model, Park launched his first Five Year Plan and he is credited with playing a pivotal role in the development of South Korea's tiger economy by shifting its focus to export-oriented industrialisation. Park's policies transformed the impoverished South Korea into prosperity, resulting in Miracle on the Han River (漢江의 奇蹟) but he was a dictator, ruling the country as head of a military dictatorship. In 1972, Park declared martial law and amended the constitution into a highly authoritarian document, tantamount to abolition of the former Constitution. During this time, political opposition and dissent was constantly repressed and Park had complete control of the media and military. In short, South Korea actually prospered under authoritarian South Korean dictator Park, it wasn't because of democracy that South Korea was prosperous. You can read about Park Chung-hee on Wikipedia.
    4
  6496.  @larrysmith2123  Japan's industrialisation occurred much earlier than China and Korea. Japan first began modernising in what's called the Meiji Restoration (明治維新) under the authoritarian rule of Japanese Emperor Meiji (of which the era is named after). Emperor Meiji abolished the Samurai class (because they lost their practicality) and this led to rebellions by the last remaining samurai against a rapidly modernising Japanese army (like in that movie starring Tom Cruise). Suffice to say, Japan modernised under imperial rule of emperors, not under democracy and rapidly grew to become the most advanced country in Asia both economically and militarily, at the start of WWII. So it wasn't because of democracy that Japan became powerful, it was because of authoritarian rule or Japanese Emperors.
    4
  6497.  @larrysmith2123  I've already explained how Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and mainland China all flourished under authoritarian rule respectively, yet why do Westerners still think that democracy is needed for a country to be successful? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    4
  6498. Best thing is to make the dogs turn against their own owner.
    4
  6499. ​ @stopwarstop7334  Speaking of killing our own Chinese, it was Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek that started the Chinese Civil War by purging communists. Even when the Japanese invaded Manchuria in 1931, Chiang was reluctant to meet the Japanese invaders head on, instead he continued killing communists (our own Chinese brethren) instead of repelling the invaders. Until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng had to kidnap Chiang and force him to ally with the communists. This incident later became known as the Xi'an Incident (西安事变) Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was thanks to communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release. Only then did the KMT agree to fight the Japanese invaders together with the communists in a united front.
    4
  6500.  @INTJ791  Wafer fabrication requires copious amounts of water (i.e Taiwan's semiconductor fab was badly hit by drought) and yet the US is building those factories in Arizona of all places?
    4
  6501.  @quekjoseph836  About one party ruling, Singapore has been ruled by authoritarian single-party PAP for 55 years just like China has been ruled by CPC for 71 years. Yet such a one party ruling system clearly works for our countries, so what's wrong with one party ruling?
    4
  6502. +Urban Decay You said that because of Taiwan shift to democracy it will now have a society that is robust and unbreakable? But look at Taiwan parliament members throwing furniture at each other violently. Video: Massive fight breaks out in Taiwanese parliament youtube.com/watch?v=kXmPDLRt6hA How is such a government robust and unbreakable? Whereas the Chinese Communist Party has been in power for almost 70 years! so it shows CCP system is more robust and unbreakable in my opinion.
    4
  6503. +tom Dobyns said "China is claiming all of the South China Sea as their own" As far as I know, Taiwan is also claiming all of the South China Sea as their own. In 1947, Republic of China (Taiwan) published the 11 Dash Line in which People's Republic of China (China) modified to our 9 Dash Line. Currently, the Taiping Island in SCS is under ROC control.
    4
  6504. +a b Taiwan's KMT leader Chiang Kai-shek was also ruthless and purged his political opponents in Taiwan, declaring Martial Law in Taiwan for more than 38 years (which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time) a period known as White Terror. Around 140,000 Taiwanese were imprisoned during this period, of which from about 3,000 to 4,000 were executed for their real or perceived opposition to the KMT. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Terror_(Taiwan) So how is Taiwan any different from China in this regard?
    4
  6505. Indian government shouldn't have let those migrants workers go back to their villages (that's where the vulnerable elderly folk are) at least gather them into a quarantine zone for 14 days, before releasing those uninfected. Or alternatively set up quarantine zones in villages for arriving migrants.
    4
  6506.  @ChillDfect  False dichotomy? You're claiming that what I said is BS, when it's apparent that even you were treated with great hospitality while in China, then how is my statement BS, when even you know this to be true?
    4
  6507.  @ChillDfect  Stereotype? You're the one claiming Chinese treated you like a cash machine or a circus animal, clearly you're the one over exaggerating here, yet you're accusing me of stereotyping? You've already admitted that you were treated with great hospitality while in China, then how is my statement considered BS when even you know it to be true?
    4
  6508.  @ChillDfect  Since you equate "stereotyping" with "warmongering" then if anyone has warmongering attitudes, it has to be the United States isn't it? After all, China is not the one coming over to the U.S to wage any war, in fact, it's the reverse situation, given what the U.S is doing by sending warships into the Taiwan Straits.
    4
  6509. When a lie gets repeated long enough, people start believing it Israel. ... ... ... Literally believing it IS REAL.
    4
  6510.  @lakvenk6554  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    4
  6511. It's a combination of Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so thoroughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance. So much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    4
  6512.  @MarkYeung1  The U.S had encouraged China to punish Vietnam (a Soviet Ally) after the Sino-Soviet split, in exchange for more U.S-China economic cooperation.
    4
  6513.  @junebug8485  The rest of the world had been ignoring it until a certain testimony by a young girl ( publicly identified as Nayirah) claiming to have witnessed Iraqi soldiers taking babies out of incubators. But it turned out to be a hoax, meant to garner support for Kuwait in the Gulf War.
    4
  6514.  @tomasstride9590  You said: "I know nothing about the man except what has been recently written. I am told that he is pro -American." If Hu Jintao was pro-American, then it's obvious you would be hearing all about him in the Western MSM. But the fact that you didn't know about Hu Jintao before this, just shows he wasn't pro-American isn't it?
    4
  6515. China's world's longest missile, the DF-41, has operational range between 12,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the range of the US LGM-30 Minuteman which has a reported range of 13,000 km. How will the mountain range shield India when Chinese ICBMs can literally fly over the Himalayas?
    4
  6516.  @daomingjin  You said: "If it was still China aka 华夏 you would still be using the same currency. However you are not using it. " Can't the same state use a different currency? When the Nationalists were in power, the Republic of China (1912-1949) issued its own currency different from the previous Qing Dynasty currency (after disposing of the Qing government) but does that mean ROC wasn't China? After the Nationalist fled to Taiwan island, there was no more ROC government (they also took Shanghai's gold reserves and transferred it to Taipei) so can't the new People's Republic of China issue a new currency? You said: "At that point there was no more 华夏 there was then 中华人共和国. Even in Chinese language it's not even the same name." China has many names throughout its long history, and Huaxia (华夏) is just one of the names of China. Other Chinese names include Zhongguo (中国), Zhonghua (中华), Jiuzhou (九州) and even my own username Shenzhou (神州) is one of the ancient names for China. All of those names refer to the same state called China. You said: "If you want to say America is a young nation then we can easily say that it's as old as Ancient Greece" Do the Americans speak and write in Greek then? Whereas even if you claim China's name is different, they are still written using Chinese Characters. You said: "Ancient Rome became the British Empire," Do the British speak Latin then? Also, the Roman Republic was a democracy, whereas the British Empire was an authoritarian monarchy under the British King/Queen for most of its rule until the 20th century.
    4
  6517.  @daomingjin  What makes you think the Forbidden City is burnt down? China's Forbidden City is ranked the world's most visited palace, have you actually been there? Here's a list of the Top 5 most visited palaces in the world. List of most-visited palaces: 1. The Forbidden City (Beijing, China) 17,000,000 visitors annually 2. St. Peter's Basilica-Apostolic Palace (Vatican City) 11,000,000 visitors annually 3. Palace of Versailles (Versailles, France) 8,100,000 visitors annually 4. Lincoln Memorial (Washington, USA): 7,804,683 visitors annually 5. Forum Romanum-Colosseum-Palatine Hill Circuit (Rome, Italy): 7,650,519 visitors annually ... (Source: Wikipedia: List of most-visited palaces and monuments) Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    4
  6518. There also needs to be a paradigm shift in Australi, away from the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindsets that's driving Sinophobic sentiment in Australia today towards China. Since the 19th century, many have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    4
  6519.  @RedHanded1969  Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-graft campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign, but after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    4
  6520. But weaboo is specific to Japan, whereas Tianyi is Chinese virtual idol.
    4
  6521.  @mg2612  Philippines maritime boundary is drawn up in the 1898 Treaty of Paris, which DOES NOT include the South China Sea Islands as within Philippines territory. (Source: Wikipedia: File: Ph boundary in Treaty of Paris 1898)
    4
  6522.  @kibspig77  My sentiments exactly, these Uighurs are Chinese. Don't know where you get the idea that I ever said that Uighurs are illegal immigrants, because I clearly did not say such a thing.
    4
  6523.  @brandonandreas4659  Those Uighur parents abroad are not illegal immigrants, and they are always welcome to come back to China. Their kids are clearly in Xinjiang, so they know where to go if they want to see them.
    4
  6524.  @Gnomezonbacon  Tiananmen Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According to Gregory Clark, the many witnesses there at the time say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    4
  6525.  @fannyalbi9040  Haven't you heard President Xi's environment policy, that "clear waters and green mountains are as valuable as gold and silver mountains?" (绿水青山就是金山银山) How is that not inspiring?
    4
  6526.  @hyc1266  US withdrawal from Afghanistan isn't the only example of the mighty US army losing to a bunch of insurgents, even during the Vietnam War, the mighty US army lost to a bunch of dirt-poor starving Vietnamese communist peasants.
    4
  6527. ​ @terencechaiwat6750  The World Economic Forum published an article entitled: Which countries are on the right track, according to their citizens, where they asked thousands of people from 25 countries whether they think their county is on the wrong track or right direction. The survey result were as follows: China: Wrong Track (10%), Right Direction (90%) Saudi Arabia: Wrong Track (20%), Right Direction (80%) India: Wrong Track (24%), Right Direction (76%) ... Canada: Wrong Track (50%), Right Direction (50%) ---> (Canada is the 50/50 mark) Australia: Wrong Track (55%), Right Direction (45%) Great Britain: Wrong Track (61%), Right Direction (39%) United States: Wrong Track (65%), Right Direction (35%) Germany: Wrong Track (68%), Right Direction (32%) ... Entire World: Wrong Track (63%), Right Direction (37%) So if the WEF survey results are accurate, it does seem to suggest that many Chinese think China is going the right direction, while conversely, many Westerners (not all) tend to think their country is on the wrong track.
    4
  6528.  @Carbuncle0168  If you claim Taiwan is a country, then why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations and the World Health Organization? Is there some force that's preventing Taiwan from joining the UN or the WHO? Then Taiwan is clearly not independent.
    4
  6529. @Sheriff Lobo China is literally the world's biggest exporter of toilet paper what makes you think Shanghai's toilets don't have toilet paper? Here's Top 20 Countries by Toilet Paper Export youtu.be/3NUnRSoi9Qg
    4
  6530.  @MarkYeung1  But as I told Sheriff Lobo, sparrows aren't the only locust-eating animals, Chinese farmers kept insect-eating livestock like ducks and chickens, and the rice fields had insect-eating frogs and fishers. Chairman Mao did not kill those people, they starved the death because of Great Chinese Famine, caused by bad-weather conditions like floods and droughts, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. How can you blame the Communist Party of China for bad weather?
    4
  6531.  @yuanfangli9272  You said: "it must first drive away its colonial rulers in China. Communist Party of Marxist-Leninist believers. This is the only way." Why are you advocating for the U.S to overthrow the Communist Party of China? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Then why do you want the U.S to overthrow our government, plunging China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country?
    4
  6532.  @zackk4969  You said: "Chiina is a thief, a cheater and a liar." Western society is built upon the backs of African slavery, causing genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, occupying their lands even till today, brutal colonization of Asia (India, Hong Kong, Singapore, etc) and African countries, and plundering resources like gold. Westerners today are rich, because they're siting on a pile of wealth that their ancestors obtained from Africa, Asia, America and Australia. Westerners stole entire continents from the natives, yet you're accusing China of being a thief?
    4
  6533.  @stephenstrange4239  Seems like you're projecting onto China what the USA is doing. Given that you agree China has not done it historically, yet why you automatically assume China will do it in the future?
    4
  6534.  Alex H  Agreed. Same as Zelenskyy.
    4
  6535.  @lucybrunson2216  Who says it doesn't help the environment? China's lunar sampling mission will analyse the Moon's surface for Helium-3, a fuel in nuclear fusion reactors which produce massive of green energy with zero pollution. Video: Fusion Power Explained youtu.be/mZsaaturR6E
    4
  6536. Take care of yourself in America. Some people online have been accusing you of being a communist party shill just for bringing up positive things about China. I hope you and your family remain safe in America.
    4
  6537.  @Moses-ef6mu  Agreed. I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and she has had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several years in fact. But there was no allegations of sexual assault in her post and Peng Shuai has repeatedly denied the allegations of sexual assault, and she has expressed a desire for personal privacy. Yet the WTA are prying into her personal affairs and demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see. Also, after the WWII, the Americans indeed absorbed German technology, even Nazi V2 Rocket scientists were put to work on NASA's moon landing missions. It goes without saying that the Nazi propaganda machine was dismantled in Germany and put to use crafting American propaganda against the Soviet Union during the Cold War and now against China. The American propaganda is so good because they learned their techniques from Joseph Goebbels (Nazi Propaganda minister).
    4
  6538.  @cryptonite2806  Well, Ukraine and Russia were historically intertwined and their peoples traveled about during the Soviet Union (of which both were a part of) so of course it's going to be different from Cuba and America. On the side note, Hawaiians have been convinced that they are Americans despite the lack of historical connections. Ukrainians wanting NATO, doesn't equate to NATO wanting Ukraine. If Zelenskyy truly cared about his people, he would surrender Ukraine. It's apparent that despite all their talk, NATO and USA aren't going to send troops to defend Ukraine. Ukraine's application to join NATO is unlikely to succeed, because that would mean NATO is obliged to send reinforcements to defend Ukraine if it were a member. So it appears that Ukraine has been abandoned (as Zelenskyy himself quipped) so the best course of action would be for Ukraine to surrender. But by refusing to surrender, Zelenskyy is prolonging the war and using civilians as a meat shield. By arming civilians with rifles and rocket launchers, he's trying to maximise civilian casualties. By removing the age restrictions for conscription, Zelenskyy is effectively enlisting child soldiers to fight and die for his refusal to surrender.
    4
  6539. Western journalists have been predicting China's economic fall since 1990. 1990. China's economy has come to a halt. The Economist 1996. China's economy will face a hard landing. The Economist 1998. China's economy’s dangerous period of sluggish growth. The Economist 1999. Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. Bank of Canada 2000. China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. Chicago Tribune 2001. A hard landing in China. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas 2002. China Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. Westchester University 2003. Banking crisis imperils China. New York Times 2004. The great fall of China? The Economist 2005. The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. Nouriel Roubini 2006. Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? International Economy 2007. Can China avoid a hard landing? TIME 2008. Hard Landing In China? Forbes 2009. China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. Fortune 2010. Hard landing coming in China. Nouriel Roubini 2011. Chinese Hard Landing Closer Than You Think. Business Insider 2012. Economic News from China: Hard Landing. American Interest 2013. A Hard Landing In China. Zero Hedge 2014. A hard landing in China. CNBC 2015. Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. Forbes 2016. Hard landing looms for China. The Economist 2017. Is China's Economy Going To Crash? National Interest 2018. China's Coming Financial Meltdown. The Daily Reckoning. 2019. China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? BBC 2020. Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. NY Times 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n. Bloomberg ... But it's already 2023 and China's economy is still going strong.
    4
  6540. Solar panels do have problems associated with them. But at the solar farm at the beginning ( 0:25 ) of the video doesn't employ solar panels, instead its uses mirrors to focus the Sun's rays onto the top of the central tower like a magnifying glass and heating up molten salt located within. The heat from the molten salt turns water into steam to drive turbines and generate electricity.
    4
  6541. The "Yellow Peril" mindset never died out. Since the 19th century, Westerners have grown throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-democratic country like China eventually surpassing the West someday in the future, is simply too frightening for Westerners to fathom.
    4
  6542.  @Stp-n-r  A multipolar world is dominated by multiple voices, not just those of Russia's and China's alone, but also the voices of the Global South (aka the Global Majority). Whereas a unipolar world is dominated by a single voice, namely that of the US's and the Global North.
    4
  6543.  @gothicserpent1093  "Gesture of good will.?.please what crap you are talking about" This is a detailed reconstruction of the Ukrainian-Russian peace negotiations in March 2022 taken from Brave New Europe: Peace for Ukraine. On March 28, Putin, as a sign of goodwill and in support of the peace negotiations, declared readiness to withdraw troops from the Kharkov area and the Kiev area; this apparently occurred even before his public announcement. –Brave New Europe: Peace for Ukraine
    4
  6544.  @borisreljanovic7292 "Gesture of goodwill? All I remember from the "3day special military operation"" Russia never assigned a deadline to the special military operation. The 3 Day limit was imposed on Russia by the MSM.
    4
  6545.  @paulbaskerville2748  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    4
  6546.  @Zerpentsa6598  If Zelenskyy truly cared about the lives of Ukrainians, he would surrender. NATO and USA have literally abandoned Ukraine (Zelenskyy said those words himself) and they aren't sending troops to defend Ukraine. Ukraine's application to join NATO is unlikely to be successful, because that would mean NATO is obliged to send reinforcements to defend Ukraine and I just can't see that happening. I don't see any way Ukraine can turn the tides against Russia so the best course of action is for Ukraine to surrender.
    4
  6547.  @dawnsurridge9602  I've also often seen this symbol of a yellow trident 🔱in a blue 🟦background being floated around, and it turns out that it's the emblem of the OUN, the same Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists that Brian was talking about.
    4
  6548. China makes use of Ultra-High-Voltage (UHV) electricity transmission cables to minimize the loss of power through transmission over vast distances.
    4
  6549.  @harryunnaa  You said: "I think Hollywood is trash but think before you speak." So you yourself admitted that Hollywood is trash, then why can't I, as Chinese, dislike Hollywood too? At least I offer a suggestion for Hollywood to cast more Asian actors that's all, to at least give Asian actors some acting experience.
    4
  6550. China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    4
  6551.  @niyarao2962  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CCP, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    4
  6552.  @user-gi3uw2th6m  Agreed. Actually if you look at Singapore, they have been under (literally) single-party rule for their entire life as a nation, under the People's Action Party for 56 years. That's similar to how China has been under Communist Party of China rule for 72 years. But under such leadership, our countries have transformed and modernised, similar to Taiwan island modernising under authoritarian single-party KMT rule.
    4
  6553. Haruka ino, In 2016 alone, 25 000 Japanese people have committed suicide which is 3 times the suicide rate of the UK. One 70-year old man even went as far as setting himself on fire while on a train just to kill himself. Everyone knows that in countries like Japan and South Korea, the men work long hours and come home late, and there is great pressure on the people to behave politely all the time. How can you expect people act so polite all the time, when all it does is build up internal stress without any outlet?
    4
  6554. Haruka ino You mentioned earlier that "China just recently passed Japan on suicide rates!" so you were clearly comparing "rates" initially. Now you suddenly want to change your stance to China having more suicide numbers because of our population? What sort of unfair comparison is this?
    4
  6555.  @henriashurst-pitkanen8735  Agreed. Taiwan used to be one of Four Asian Tigers but since democracy was introduced to Taiwan, it's economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving for jobs in the mainland or Singapore.
    4
  6556.  @Tony-tb3yf  "So you understood that Taiwan is not part of China now after swum to America?" Actually, if you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar (Burma), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a Map of all the territory Taiwan claims (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg )
    4
  6557. Singapore has been governed by authoritarian single-party PAP for 54 years just like China has been governed by authoritarian single-party CPC for 71 years. Yet Singapore is below many Westerners' radar, unlike China.
    4
  6558.  @michaels4255  You said: "The US temporarily acquired the Philippines from Spain. They never "colonized" the Philippines." Senator Albert J. Beveridge, one of the most prominent American imperialists at the time, said: "Americans altruistically went to war with Spain to liberate Cubans, Puerto Ricans, and Filipinos from their tyrannical yoke. If they lingered on too long in the Philippines, it was to protect the Filipinos from European predators waiting in the wings for an American withdrawal and to tutor them in American-style democracy." If that doesn't sound like American colonization of the Philippines, then I don't know what is.
    4
  6559. ​@PowerGuy1 "神州 Shenzhou Those people died because they stood in the way of progress." I think you meant they died because they stood in the way of American Imperialism.
    4
  6560. @PowerGuy1 Capitalism and Democracy were literally forced onto the people of the Philippines at gunpoint. How can you call it democracy when it's forcefully imposed onto another country? Those people that fought and died against American Imperialism did so for the sake of their country, whereas the Americans did it because they wanted another colony.
    4
  6561.  @mirandaab972  You said: "Every COUNTRY has its own flaws but I believe China is the worst when it comes to those "flaws" China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    4
  6562.  @Ace-mw9pm  Imperial Japan had refused to surrender even after U.S bombed Japanese cities. In fact the last campaign fought of WWII was the Soviet invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria August 1945, after which the Japanese finally surrendered, so if anything, we should be thanking the communists in Soviet Union for finally putting an end to WWII isn't it?
    4
  6563.  @Ace-mw9pm  About U.S troops stationed in Okinawa, Japan, there are cases where U.S marines sexually assaulted local women in Okinawa, prompting protests from locals wanting U.S bases off their soil, but the Japanese governor is powerless to chase the U.S troops away, so isn't that a form of American colonization in of itself?
    4
  6564.  @MaximillianHel  It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Russo-phobic and Sino-phobic sentiment in the West towards Russia and China respectively. And it's having the effect of driving both countries closer than we've ever been before and the Russia-China relationship is rock solid.
    4
  6565.  @MrJonbelt  Meng Wanzhou's constitutional rights were violated during her arrest. Canadian border authorities did not tell Meng she was the subject of an arrest warrant that came out of USA. During her arrest, Meng was not read out her rights, and Meng was not allowed to contact her lawyer for advice concerning her rights. She was forced to give away her passcode to her smartphone and laptop, so that the Canadian officials could unlock her electronic devices and search their contents illegally. You said: "And oh, Meng stays in her mansion in Canada while she faces a case before the courts." What's your meaning behind this sentence? You expect China to house the two Canadians in mansions of their own, just because Meng Wanzhou can afford her own mansion? What childish logic is this, you tell me?
    4
  6566.  @michaelloong964  I have a feeling that all those NATO lethal aid pouring into Ukraine might end up on the black market, once Ukraine inevitably loses to Russia. Those Stinger anti-aircraft missiles and Javelin anti-tank missiles could potentially target EU civilian airliners, especially if they fall into the hands of terrorists or Ukrainian ultra-nationalists that've become disillusioned after NATO's abandonment of Ukraine and hold a grudge against NATO.
    4
  6567. You're correct. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past like many African nations. But China found success through building infrastructure like roads, railways, bridges, etc, so we are offering the same path to success to African countries wishing to emulate China's road to success.
    4
  6568.  @jonasgeist7779  His decision not to accept payment was made on 19 Apr 2021 according to his email at 7:30 of the video. Serpentza's video "exposing the truth" was published on 18 Nov, 2021 then how does your claim that "if Whinston wouldn't have exposed the truth, he would have ran with the money." make sense when he made his decision even before serpentza published his video? Did you pay attention to the timeline of events?
    4
  6569.  @MarkYeung1  Tell that to the Canadian truckers protesting about vaccine mandates.
    4
  6570.  @ethimself5064  So if you're claiming to be anti-CPC, that means you're against communist party members like Deng Xiaoping, Zhou Enlai, Li Wenliang, Ren Zhangfei, Jack Ma, and all 90 million communist party members? Every single one of them?
    4
  6571.  @stunningandbrave2520  You asked: "The real question is, "Why is China building carrier battle groups as fast as it can?" China learned harsh lessons from the Century of Humiliation, that a big country with a weak army is susceptible to invasion from foreign powers like Japan and Britain. That's why China is rapidly modernizing our military in order to deter potential invaders as well as to protect China's sovereignty. Nevertherless, China is not the country with the most aircraft carriers in the world, so why do you ask?
    4
  6572. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners (but not all) are increasing pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    4
  6573.  @immi8419  Have you been to Russia?
    4
  6574. If you want to bring back American factories, then are Americans themselves willing to work at the same low wage as Chinese workers? If not, then the prices of your Made In America goods will inevitably rise, leading to more inflation.
    4
  6575.  @Andy-P  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Mao was the main cause of the famine." Could you explain your reasoning? The Great Chinese Famine was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. In 1958, the Yellow River flooded that coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. In July 1958, the peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 m3/s (790,000 cu ft/s) with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kg/m3 (57 lb/cu ft), 14× and 24× their mean annual values, respectively. The flood water level was so high that it rose up to the top of the levee in several places. This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. It was reported as the most severe flood since 1933.
    4
  6576.  @MarkYeung1  If you look at Taiwan's opinion polls, the vast majority of the people of Taiwan want the status quo to continue. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Only a small percentage want independence, as declaring independence would be seen as changing the status quo.
    4
  6577.  @MarkYeung1  Let's look at the population growth of China under Chairman Mao. Population of China from 1950-1975 1950: 554,419,268 1955: 612,241,552 1960: 660,408,054 1965: 724,218,970 1970: 827,601,385 1975: 926,240,888 ... Source: Population Pyramid: China As you can see, China's population actually increased under Chairman Mao Zedong, during the periods of the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution. That's why many people in China celebrate Mao Zedong's birthday by traveling to his birthplace in Shaoshan, yet you claim mainland Chinese hate Mao Zedong?
    4
  6578.  @MarkYeung1  I've lost track of the number of times I've heard the same old excuse of "I'm not anti-China, I'm just anti-CPC" being tossed around. For those people who marvel at China's success, it was achieved under communist party leadership. The same political party during Mao Zedong era, as during Deng Xiaoping era as is today under President Xi Jinping. The Communist Party of China transformed China from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy today, the world's factory (Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd largest military spending. Many Westerners (but not all) and overseas Chinese don't seem to understand true mainland Chinese culture. The government of China is the keeper of all Chinese culture and knowledge, even though Western culture is about separating the government from the country, whereas in Chinese culture, the two are inseparable.
    4
  6579.  @KuangWen0  Even President Xi Jinping acknowledges Chairman Mao's contributions to Chinese society. Much of Xi Jinping Thought comes from Xi's 2013 speech, which focused on Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought, China's place in history, strategic competition with capitalist nations, and a plea to adhere to the goals of communism. In surveying the history of China, Xi argued it is "Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought that guided the Chinese people out of the darkness of that long night and established a New China." And, as to the future, "the consolidation and development of the socialist system will require its own long period of history... it will require the tireless struggle of generations, up to ten generations.
    4
  6580.  @sy.l3435  我觉得西方媒体继续给他们的民众洗脑挺好让他们知道中国和中国人民都不咋滴，我们继续低调的发展。西方对中国的理解程度绝对比不上我们对西方的了解程度。
    4
  6581.  @Yonatan-jv8mv  said "Even without the help from China I bet he would have still grown to be successful" This Cambodian boy has been speaking multiple languages from English, Espanol to Mandarin, but many Westerner tourists have seemingly ignored him, so if not for China, this boy might have remained a temple vendor his entire life. Because most Westerners don't care about Cambodians.
    4
  6582. Honestly speaking, Chinese propaganda does a poor job conveying China's achievements to Western audiences, and is in clear need of improvement. Many Westerners hardly believe Chinese media, even though they often quote data and statistics drawn from primary sources. Whereas Western anti-China propaganda is very effective. Almost everyone believes what Western MSM says about China, even when it's unsubstantiated by evidence. There's clearly room for Chinese media to improve, and possibly learn a thing or two how to better communicate its message across to Western audiences.
    4
  6583. Aryavarta Bharat Pakistan is sovereign country as recognised by India, so China and Pakistan are conducting business bilaterally as country to country. If you are so against Pakistan, then why did Indian leaders like PM Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi let the British and Jinnah partition British India in 1947, forming two independent countries? Afterwards, India supported Bangladesh independence from East Pakistan, forming another independent country. Each separation only weakens the original country, and you can no longer control the newly created countries, which may become a future thorn in your side. That's why China fight so hard to hold on to our territories like Hong Kong and Taiwan. We don't want end up in the same situation as India and Pakistan, brother states that constantly blame each other and oppose each other even after 70 years. Why not attempt to repair the damaged relations instead of promoting conflict between your countries? China is helping develop Pakistan economy through economic corridor project. This is a rare opportunity for both Pakistan and India to cooperate together in developing Pakistan to a stable country. Otherwise, do you want to keep on opposing each other, for another 70 years into the future?
    4
  6584. China is 3rd country in the world to demonstrate anti-satellite capabilities, by taking out a 750 kg satellite in orbit at altitude of 865 km, with a ground launched missile in 2007. If PLA takes out Indian army satellites, then Indian ground troops will be put at a disadvantage without satellite communication and coordination.
    4
  6585. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilizations still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have long since faded to history. Britain only became powerful in 18t century, and USA in 19th century, but before that, China was the ruling superpower for 1800 years.
    4
  6586.  @MarkYeung1  "Just because Russia is a BRICS member doesn't mean China should support the Russia economy to fuel the war." India is a BRICS member yet India continues to trade with Russia and has not condemned Russia's special military operation in Ukraine, so what's your point? You're just trying to single out China that's all. Also, the USA continues to send military aid to Ukraine in support of war, yet you only pick on China?
    4
  6587.  @JR-ng9yo  "It includes Arunachal Pradesh, India as one of China's states." Arunachal Pradesh is part of Southern Tibet (which is a part of China). The British, after colonizing India, drew up India's borders and included Arunachal Pradesh as part of their territory, ignoring the historical boundaries and without even consulting China about the border. Even till today, India still insist on the British India border instead of consulting historical boundaries between India and China.
    4
  6588. ​ @MarkYeung1  "What has China done to Ukraine since the beginning of the war?" China has provided humanitarian supplies to Ukraine, including infant formula, quilts, and moisture-proof mats. China has also offered to mediate peace between Ukraine and Russia, and even put forth a 12-point peace plan for a peaceful resolution to the conflict in Ukraine. Putin has welcomed this plan while the US rejected this peace plan. Instead, the United States continues to send military aid to Ukraine then isn't this a clear example of supporting war?
    4
  6589. Every country have their own eating habits. The French eat snails and horsemeat, British eat rabbit stew, and Australian eat kangaroo meat and crocodile meat, so why should China change our eating habits?
    4
  6590.  @rpg1663  You said: "Capitalism improved the life quality of billions, not to say every single person in the world.. it developed science, medicine, social care, transportation, lots of food lol," Capitalism improved the quality of life of a few select countries, predominantly the Anglo-Saxon countries in the global North (i.e USA, UK, Canada, Australia, the EU) at the expense of people living in the global South (i.e South America, Africa, and much of Asia). The poor developing countries are exploited by the wealthier developed countries (even till today) and their natural resources were extracted and obtained at cheap rates by capitalists, who then use labor to make finished products to sell back to developing countries in order to keep them poor. Capitalism has improved the lives of developed countries at the expense of developing countries. Socialists/Communists have also developed science and help advanced mankind's technology. For example, the Soviet Union invented and launched the world's first artificial satellite, Sputnik-1 on October 4, 1957. The Soviet Union also made many inventions and advancements to human society while under the Communist Party of the Soviet Union On October 4, 1957, the Soviet Union sent the beach ball-sized satellite, Sputnik 1 into space. The launch grabbed the world’s attention because it was at the height of the Cold War. Video: The Sputnik 1 Launch: The First Artificial Satellite To Enter Earth's Orbit | Mach | NBC News youtu.be/g2WaJdflqT0 You said: "The foundation of capitalism is Trading, not the seek of profit as you mention, and it's practiced in the world for centuries. Communism you basically have people working and producing things, and delivering them to some sort of state, which will later split those things amongst everyone in the same proportion. I believe you need to go back and read the fundamentals of communism..." The foundation of capitalism is the private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit, and unequal trade is one of the methods capitalists do to achieve this. In true communism, the working class own* the means of production (i.e dictatorship of the proletariat) and a governing state is absent in true communism.
    4
  6591.  @rpg1663  Which countries did the Soviet Union exploit and how did the Soviet Union exploit China? China was exploited by the Western capitalists during the 19th century, when the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything from the West, so the British waged two wars with China and force Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into a British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout the rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us. You said: "As for the other countries you mention (i.e South America, Africa, and much of Asia) is well known that they have also benefited from capitalism, and they still do, even if in a smaller scale." How have the Global South (i.e South America, Africa and much of Asia) benefited from capitalism? Poverty is not decreasing worldwide at the rate that institutions like the World Bank and the United Nations claim. The Global North (i.e USA, UK, Canada, Australia, NZ, EU) is not developing the Global South, it is under-developing the global south, through manipulation of data, crushing debt traps, covert intelligence operations, military interventions, and a modification of age-old colonialism tactics, rich nations are keeping poor nations in their current state. Back in the 1500s, it was a different story, there was little difference between Europe and the rest of the world. In fact, people living in South America, India and Asia were in many ways better off than the Europeans in terms of living standards, and Asian countries actually had higher living standards than Europeans. But European colonization reversed this by de-populating Africa, North America and South America from the 16th century to the 19th century, through slavery, warfare and control, all in the service of stripping resources from other nations, many of which prior to that time, were not suffering from poverty. This the world system of colonialism. Video: Global Capitalism - Rich Nations and Poor Nations | Renegade Cut youtu.be/Q6WdUkaFyGw Prior to colonialism, Africa was advancing and progressing economically and politically, had the atlantic slave trade and colonialism never been imposed on Africa, it's development almost certainly would not have stagnated. The global economy post-colonialism is still affected by colonialism. Slavery caused wages to shrink, as workers had to compete with free labor. Poor countries have a comparative deficit of capital because they were plundered of precious metals and because their colonizers forcibly destroyed local industries so that they would have no choice but to consume Western exports. Poor countries were kept poor because the rich countries also transferred their debts to poor countries, in violation of international law. Poor nations were forced to borrow loans from Western institutions and they could only export raw materials at cheap rates and had to buy finished goods from the West. As for China's massive improvement, it is not because of capitalism (as often claimed). In fact, if you watch the video link, China (and a few other countries in Asia) are some of the only places in the world, where free-market capitalism was not forcibly imposed by the World Bank and the IMF. China was not subject to the structural adjustment imposed on the Global South. In other words, our current economic system has not made the global south better, it has made it worse. And the only nations mostly immune to the machinations of the World Bank and IMF are "communist" nations in Asia.
    4
  6592. China always welcome India to come onboard the Belt and Road Initiative for mutual benefit and progress for both our countries but India reject this offer.
    4
  6593. China and India are the two most populous countries in the world and our countries face possibility of being overwhelmed by our population and having insufficient resources to support everyone. With such large student population, competition for top schools and higher education is fierce and intense in our countries and when they graduate, their aren't enough jobs to go around for everyone. That's why most international students and foreign workers in other countries tend to be Chinese and Indians.
    4
  6594. Outwardly, USA expressed support for Japan releasing irradiated Fukushima waters. But inwardly, USA has maintained a ban on imports of farming and seafood products from the region near Fukushima. Yet JaYoe Nation thinks Chinese are just being racist against Japanese?
    4
  6595. According to China tourism statistics, the following countries visited China the most in 2015 1. South Korea (4.44 million) 2. Japan (2.49 million) 3. Vietnam (2.16 million) ... ... 6. Mongolia (1.07 million) 7. Philippines (1.00 million) So if Chinese treat these people like thrash, then why are their tourists coming to our country by the millions?
    4
  6596. Check out Indian's Chandrayaa-2 Lunar Lander attempt. Video: India's Lunar Lander May Have Crashed Into the Moon youtu.be/WV5gUOpj3HM
    4
  6597.  The Racial Observer  "神州 Shenzhou Where's the unstoppable Chinese military in the Ukraine?" Russia doesn't even need China's help in Ukraine. The question should be "Where is NATO in Ukraine?"
    4
  6598.  @stevew6910  said "We was a big reason for China becoming a member of the world trade organization," Please don't act as though USA "invited" China to WTO. When WTO was founded in 1995, China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate our country as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because the United States, European countries, and Japan requested that China first reform various tariff policies, including tariff reductions, open markets and industrial policies. The United States imposed additional conditions on China and when China joined the WTO, it agreed to considerably harsher conditions than other developing countries. So Westerners didn't help China to join WTO, we wanted to be a member back in 1995, but this attempt was thwarted by US and its allies, so in the end, China had a late entry to WTO in 2001 instead.
    4
  6599.  @CuongNguyen-le5ic  Are you sure lots of foreigners come to Vietnam because they missed China during that time with more freedom? According to World Tourism Rankings, China is world's 4th most visited country, after France, Spain and the United States. seeing some 60.7 million international visitors. 1. France (86.9 million) 2. Spain (81.8 million) 3. United States (76.9 million) 4. China (60.7 million) <-- 5. Italy (58.3 million) 6. Mexico (39.3 million) Source: Wikipedia: World Tourism rankings China is also the most visited Asian country in the world, surpassing even other Asian tourist destinations like Japan, Korea, India, Thailand and Vietnam Asia-Pacific Region: 1. China (60.7 million) 2. Thailand (35.4 million) 3. Japan (28.7 million) 4. Hong Kong (China) (27.9 million) 5. Malaysia (26.0 million) ... ... Vietnam is not even within the Top 10 most popular destination in Asia.
    4
  6600.  @louiscoulter  Brian is quoting Western MSM articles from BBC, and you're saying that he's a Russian propagandist? Just for reading out BBC articles?
    4
  6601. I think it means that China recognized that Ukraine was formerly part of the Soviet Union. However, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, even Taiwan's own constitution says that it's part of China.
    4
  6602.  @auroragb  As far as I know, Hong Kong is a democracy, and the Hong Kong Chief Executive (香港特首) is voted into power by the Election Committee (选举委员会) (which consists of Hong Kong groups) and all Beijing does is approve the candidates that's all. The current Hong Kong Chief Executive, Carrie Lam, won the 2017 election by garnering over 700 votes out of the 1,200-member committee and Beijing did not cast any votes in Hong Kong's election. So what makes you say the protests are about being lied to by the CCP?
    4
  6603.  @auroragb  You quoted "The ultimate aim is the selection of the Chief Executive by universal suffrage upon nomination by a broadly representative nominating committee in accordance with democratic procedures." but there was NO time limit to it. So why are you claiming that CCP lied then? There's NO time limit to when universal suffrage has to be implemented according to that verse. And CCP is well within their rights to appoint Hong Kong's Chief Executive as per Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45.
    4
  6604.  @auroragb  That means not even half of 50 years have passed so what are you complaining about then? And there is NO stated time limit that universal suffrage has to be granted to Hong Kong, so why are you claiming CCP lied? Which verse of Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45, did CCP lied about you tell me?
    4
  6605.  @anonsaccount1562  China today is currently at peace at not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, etc. Nobody is pointing a gun at those countries and forcing them to do business with China if they don't want to. Whereas the United States is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, etc, even in the 21st century. The US is enacting regime change by cutting off those country's "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now, Assad of Syria and Maduro of Venezuela are at risk and President Trump narrowly avoided starting a fresh war with Iran too.
    4
  6606.  @auroragb  That's because Singapore government stifles free speech and banned protests. According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore (Source: hrw.org/asia/singapore ) Singapore’s political environment is stifling. Citizens face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. In 2017, the country tightened the already strict limits on public assemblies contained in the Public Order Act, which requires police permits for any “cause-related” assembly outside the closely monitored “Speakers’ Corner.” - Human Rights Watch: Singapore So doesn't this sound exactly like Chinese political system?
    4
  6607.  @auroragb  Besides infrastructure construction, Chinese smartphone makers also dominate the Top 10 Smartphone Brands in 2019 according to (Source: mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html ) Below are the Top 10 smartphone brands in 2019: 1st Place : Samsung (S. Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (S. Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French)
    4
  6608. Look at what Uighurs did during the Urumqi Riots. The Uighur rioters stabbed Han Chinese passers-by and broke into their stores with thrown furniture, and looted their goods, overturned cars and so on. I mean, Han Chinese come to Xinjiang to help develop the province, build roads, open businesses, attract tourism, and you Uighur get upset and kill Chinese people? Just enter "Uighur Riots" into Youtube and see what I mean.
    4
  6609.  @mage9825  You said: "China still has a long long way to go when compared to say, Singapore, Japan, Canada." The Singapore Prime Minister is the ranked the world's highest paid leader of a country, drawing a whopping salary of $1,610,000 (USD) annually, which is basically legalized corruption if you asked me.
    4
  6610.  @Nesher92  Why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? The KMT had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan?
    4
  6611.  @Nesher92  Last few years of British empire? That means that Hong Kong people never enjoyed democracy under authoritarian British colonial rule, yet now Hong Kong actually held more elections AFTER the 1997 handover back to mainland China, so how exactly did China not respect the Sino-British declaration? Currently Hong Kong elections their own government separate from the mainland (something they couldn't have done for 150 years as a British colony) and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's current elections, so how exactly did China not respect the Sino-British declaration?
    4
  6612.  @Nesher92  Since you yourself admitted that Hong Kong developed under authoritarian British colonial rule, then why is there a sudden need to implement democracy in Hong Kong? You have admitted that Hong Kong's success wasn't built on democracy, it was built under authoritarian rule. It's only after mainland China introduced democracy to Hong Kong under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, that all this Hong Kong protests started and Hong Kong economy is in a slump today.
    4
  6613. No freedoms? According to Global Slavery Index, India has 18 millions people living in conditions of modern slavery, at least 5 times more than any other country. Source: qz(dot)com/695565
    4
  6614.  cantonpillow  China invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world. Paper and Printing made the recording and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought.
    4
  6615. @nationalghost During the Chinese Civil War for the control of China, the communists were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were crappy, and they had far fewer numbers (only 50 communist members in 1921) than the Kuomintang. The KMT on the other hand, had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa (now Taiwan)? This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland. The communists have survived numerous KMT attempts to wipe them out, such as the Long March, and they emerged victorious over mainland China so why isn't their claim legit then? Dr. Sun Yatsen also overthrew the Qing Dynasty in 1911, and the CCP overthrew the KMT in 1949 that's all.
    4
  6616. @nationalghost Before the communists came to power, the Republic of China (1912-1949) also suffered numerous disasters like the Japanese invasion of Manchuria for example. There were several famines under ROC rule, such as 1920-1921 North China famine, 1928–1930 famine, 1936-1937 famine in Sichuan and Gansu, 1942–1943 famine in Henan, so disasters did not occur prior to CCP taking control over China. And China didn't really kill those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, destroying crops and resulting in poor harvest and starvation. Even Mao Zedong can't possibly control the weather isn't it? So why are you comparing people who died in famines to a war then?
    4
  6617.  cantonpillow  Chinese invented weapons like the crossbow, the ballistae and the traction trebuchet. The Chinese crossbow invention enabled medieval European peasants to fight against skilled archers. Besides inventing gunpowder, Chinese also invented handcannons, handgrenades, fragmentation bombs, landmines, naval mines, exploding cannonballs, rocket launchers, multi-launch rocket systems and of course, fireworks. Americans celebrate the 4th of July with Chinese fireworks, and there was even an ancient Chinese flamethrower capable of launching continuous stream of flame (the first of its kind) which must have been a fearsome sight to behold in the ancient battlefield. Video: Ancient Chinese Flamethrower youtube.com/watch?v=goi-FVnTD5Y&t=915
    4
  6618. @nationalghost The KMT also received massive foreign aid from the United States to help them fight the communists, but KMT was notoriously corrupt and they pocketed some $750,000,000 worth of US military aid, until even U.S President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves." So even with superior numbers, superior wealth and massive US military aid, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa? This shows KMT is simply not fit to rule China, by its own incompetent actions.
    4
  6619. @nationalghost What makes you think the United States version of the Great Chinese Famine is accurate? The USA has anti-Communist agenda on their minds so its possible that they want to pin as much blame on Communist China as possible in order to undermine communist rule. I mean, how does USA even know how many Chinese people starved to death themselves? And after the Great Chinese Famine, there have been no other case famine under CCP rule, so what's your point then? China today is even the world's most populous country at 1.4 billion people so it is apparent that the effects of the Great Chinese Famine didn't hinder China's population growth.
    4
  6620. @nationalghost When the KMT fled to Taiwan, Chiang kai-shek continued his authoritarian rule of Taiwan, and jailed and executed many of his political rivals and dissidents (whether real or perceived) in a period called White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. By all accounts, the KMT were clearly an authoritarian dictatorship, so why the double standard? Why is CCP's authoritarian rule of mainland China "illegal" in your eyes, when the KMT were just as authoritarian in their own ways?
    4
  6621. @nationalghost said "China doesn't have innovations by the government of CCP" The Chinese government is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending and catching up fast to the United States. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($451.9 billion) <--- 3. European Union ($379.0 billion) 4. Japan ($165.7 billion) 5. Germany ($118.8 billion) 6. South Korea ($91.6 billion) In the West, researchers offend have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    4
  6622. @nationalghost If you want to see a direct indicator of rising innovation in China, just take a look at China's ranking in the Global Innovation Index, and China's rank has been steadily rising over the past few years. -In 2015, China was ranked 29th -In 2016, China was ranked 25th -In 2017, China was ranked 22nd -in 2018, China was ranked 17th ... Source: Global Innovation Index Indicator Rankings globalinnovationindex.org/analysis-indicator In just 3 years, China's innovation index ranking rose by 12 ranks. Lets see what the 2019 rank will like be for China this year. Hopefully, perhaps by 2020, China might even be among the world's top 10 most innovative countries. Who knows? But China clearly appears to be rising in the ranks if you follow the trend.
    4
  6623. @nationalghost I have shown that UN nations voted democratically in 1971 to recognise PRC as China and to kick ROC out of the UN Security Council. What more needs to be said about CCP legitimacy? You failed to provide any evidence of CCP illegitimacy. No polls, no UN General Assembly Resolutions, nothing! It's all just your own personal opinion that's all about the judicial system that's all.
    4
  6624. @nationalghost About academic freedom, China is world's 3rd most popular destination for international students and as of 2013, China is the most popular country in Asia for international students, surpassing even other Asian destinations like Japan, Korea, Singapore, India, etc, according to Institute of International Education. Source: China ranks 3rd among countries that host the most international students usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/2013/10/08/explore-the-worlds-top-universities
    4
  6625. @nationalghost China is also home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight and Tianhe-2 and in the 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, ahead of USA's 144 out of 500. Source: China surpasses U.S in supercomputer usage cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion). This means Chinese researchers hold an advantage by having access to more advanced research facilities in China.
    4
  6626. It's a zero sum game mentality.
    4
  6627.  @MarkYeung1  "Do you know how many people died due to capitalism?" Searched Quora for How many deaths are caused by capitalism? came up with this response: 222,500,000+ Deaths due to certain events: 100,000,000: Extermination of native Americans (1492–1890) 15,000,000: Atlantic slave trade (1500–1870) 150,000: French repression of Haiti slave revolt (1792–1803) 300,000: French conquest of Algeria (1830–1847) 50,000: Opium Wars (1839–1842 & 1856–1860) 1,000,000: Irish Potato Famine (1845–1849) 100,000: British supression of the Sepoy Mutiny (1857–1858) 20,000: Paris Commune Massacre (1871) 29,000,000: Famine in British Colonized India (1876–1879 & 1897–1902) 3,445: Black people lynched in the US (1882–1964) 10,000,000: Belgian Congo Atrocities: (1885–1908) 250,000: US conquest of the Philipines (1898–1913) 28,000: British concentration camps in South Africa (1899–1902) 800,000: French exploitation of Equitorial Africans (1900–1940) 65,000: German genocide of the Herero and Namaqua (1904–1907) 10,000,000: First World War (1914–1918) 100,000: White army pogroms against Jews (1917–1920) 600,000: Fascist Italian conquest in Africa (1922–1943) 10,000,000: Japanese Imperialism in East Asia (1931–1945) 200,000: White Terror in Spain (1936–1945) 25,000,000: Nazi oppression in Europe: (1938–1945) 30,000: Kuomintang Massacre in Taiwan (1947) 80,000: French suppression of Madagascar revolt (1947) 30,000: Israeli colonization of Palastine (1948-present) 100,000: South Korean Massacres (1948–1950) 50,000: British suppression of the Mau-Mau revolt (1952-1960) 16,000: Shah of Iran regime (1953–1979) 1,000,000: Algerian war of independence (1954–1962) 200,000: Juntas in Guatemala (1954–1962) 50,000: Papa & Baby Doc regimes in Haiti (1957–1971) 3,000,000: Vietnamese killed by US military (1963–1975) 1,000,000: Indonesian mass killings (1965–1966) 1,000,000: Biafran War (1967–1970) 400: Tlatelolco massacre (1968) 700,000: US bombing of Laos & Cambodia (1967–1973) 50,000: Somoza regime in Nicaragua (1972–1979) 3,200: Pinochet regime in Chile: (1973–1990) 1,500,000: Angola Civil War (1974–1992) 200,000: East Timor massacre (1975–1998) 1,000,000: Mozambique Civil War (1975–1990) 30,000: US-backed state terrorism in Argentina (1975–1990) 70,000: El Salvador military dictatorships (1977–1991) 30,000: Contra proxy war in Nicaragua: (1979–1990) 16,000: Bhopal Carbide disaster (1984) 3,000: US invasion of Panama (1989) 1,000,000: US embargo on Iraq (1991–2003) 400,000: Mujahideen faction conflict in Afghanistan (1992–1996) 200,000: Destruction of Yugoslavia (1992–1995) 6,000,000: Congolese Civil War (1997–2008) 30,000: NATO occupation of Afghanistan (2001-present)
    4
  6628.  @pierremarel  Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    4
  6629.  @pierremarel  You said: "But I will still use the same critical thinking not to be duped about the supposedly generous, peaceful motivations of the CCP." China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, the US appears to be a threat to global peace and stability.
    4
  6630. @comment sense The one who is truly afraid is making lots of noise, and constantly trying to pick a fight with China here.
    4
  6631. Why suddenly resort to hurling racial slurs here?
    4
  6632. USA: Hey China, we want YOU to build our products at competitive prices to give us an edge over the competition. China: Sure thing, but we'll need access to your sensitive information and secret blueprints in order to make the products. USA: Done!
    4
  6633.  @elanor2123  You said: "many Chinese people believe (and they're taught that) the ccp is the savior of the country which created 'new China'. However, the biggest reason why China's economy grew so quickly is because of the common people's hardworkings. After China opened itself," So you've admitted that China opened itself, then who opened China? It was Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms in the late 1970s that opened China up, so isn't it the Communist Party of China that allowed China's economy to grow so quickly? Then why can't CPC claim this as their achievements, given that even you admitted China opened up? You know who was it that wooed foreign companies to come to China and set up shop here? It was the Communist Party of China that did that, attracting foreign companies to set up factories and hire Chinese workers, so once again, how is this not the CPC's achievement?
    4
  6634.  Edmund Kemper  Previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong while it was under British colonial rule. It's only during the period of Hong Kong's 1997 handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that the people of Hong Kong finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy where they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    4
  6635.  @yanguYT  Agreed. Westerners actually sold enough chests of opium to China to kill everyone on Earth several times over. During the 19th century, the opium imports into China grew exponentially. Graph: Opium imports into China 1650-1880 wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Opium_imports_into_China_1650-1880_EN.svg This is the insidious nature of addictive substances, and opium addiction crippled China's economy as opium addicts sold off their life savings to obtain more of the addictive substance.
    4
  6636. Here's a short 2-min video of the beautiful night view of 11 Chinese cities in China. Video: 中国大陆11座城市美丽夜景 Beautiful Night View of 11 Chinese cities in 2 Minutes youtu.be/mzR8Scsd33g (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    4
  6637. For people who want actual proof, the actual name of the party in Chinese is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where Zhōngguó (中国共) means China and Gòngchǎndǎng (共产党) means Communist Party. So the proper name should be the Communist Party of China (CPC), not the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
    4
  6638.  @jm4663  Carrie Lam has formally withdrawn the HK extradition bill, yet the Hong Kong protests still continue? Carrie Lam has clearly said she's open to dialogue but the protestors aren't, and they refuse to talk. So no matter what Carrie Lam does, the Hong Kong protestors aren't satisfied, so more authoritarian measures like anti-mask law are necessary now.
    4
  6639.  @jm4663  The anti-mask law was enacted by the powers bestowed upon Hong Kong government by the colonial British law. And if protestors are not at the spot of the rally, they why would they get arrested? The anti-mask law applies to to wearing masks at public assembly sites. Even Western countries like Canada banned masks at rallies.
    4
  6640. @Dāiwánlángsǐquánjiā China wasn't originally named China before the Western powers began taking notice of such a civilization state. (YT literally censors your name so I can't post it)
    4
  6641. I'm glad that other people are able to see through Artur Ganczarski (self-proclaimed Westerner and Sinologist) comments that are just so full of it. It's frankly astonishing that one can spew such vitriol towards a country and its people, yet claim to have never felt superior.
    4
  6642.  @borisnegrarosa9113  "Show us proof of any armada or even this Zheng He. That's right, you can't." Travel to Dongsha Island and dive underwater to see the ruins of the seven large sunken ships that have been confirmed to belong to Zheng He's fleet.
    4
  6643.  @borisnegrarosa9113  They were raised around Zheng He's time obviously. And I've already mention that despite Zheng He having an armada of 300, conquest was never in his mind, and that's why there's less evidence compared to those of the Western colonial powers that arrived later. Because it was never in China's blood to form overseas colonies. You said: "Are we supposed to believe in powerful Chinese armadas consisting of thousands of advanced ships?" Did I ever said that there were thousands of ships in Zheng He's fleet? It's obvious that you're not even paying close attention to the conversation.
    4
  6644.  @borisnegrarosa9113  They were raised around Zheng He's time obviously. And I've already mention that despite Zheng He having an armada of 300, conquest was never in his mind, and that's why there's less evidence compared to those of the Western colonial powers that arrived later. Because it was never in China's blood to do so. You said: "Are we supposed to believe in powerful Chinese armadas consisting of thousands of advanced ships?" Did I ever said that there were thousands of ships in Zheng He's fleet? It's obvious that you're not even paying close attention to the conversation.
    4
  6645.  @borisnegrarosa9113  Zheng He existed during Ming Dynasty which was a Han ruled dynasty, not a Mongolian ruled dynasty. The Mongol-ruled dynasty was huge and expansionist, that's why the Map of Yuan Dynasty is larger than the Han-ruled Ming Dynasty. Had Han Chinese been as expansionist as Mongols, then the Ming Dynasty map would be larger than Yuan Dynasty map, won't you agree? Also, the Mongols were mostly land expansionist, not naval expansionists.
    4
  6646.  @borisnegrarosa9113  You said: "And the Zheng He theory does indeed claim there were thousands of ships." Show me which Zheng He theory claims that there were thousands of ships?
    4
  6647. +captindo I mean, Black Mirror is just a work of fiction, and the writers and film producers purposely exaggerate the stories for entertainment purposes, when in reality it may not proceed according to what the stories described.
    4
  6648.  @qanaqa33174  In truth, the past 100-200 years of Western dominance of the world is a historical anomaly. If you look back further, for the past 1000-2000 years, it was China (and also India) that made up around 21% of the world's historical GDP. Now the world's economic focus is shifting back to its original position.
    4
  6649. Actually, the government wanted to punish North Korea's latest missile test, which coincided with BRICS summit held in Xiamen China, presumably showcasing DPRK defiance against China. Since President Trump wants to impose new sanctions on North Korea, Chinese government is taking this opportunity to punish N. Korea and send firm message to them, by supporting UN sanctions. In politics, its all about the selecting the right timing to implement your actions for maximum effect.
    4
  6650.  suburben yobbo  Japan has had low birth rates for some time now and is suffering from an aging population, yet Japan is still around today, so what makes you think China will collapse over the coming decades? 2050-2100 you say the deadline is? What makes you think the Chinese government won't have come up with a solution by then? And One Child Policy was necessary back when China was still dirt-poor, but now that we have lifted millions out of poverty, what's wrong with switching it to Two Child Policy? And India is suffering from high child malnutrition so why have multiple births when there's not enough food to feed all its kids? China's One Child Policy clearly worked for China back when China was dirt-poor. Source: India has largest number of malnourished children in the world livemint.com/politics/oidnvn30nqdrgqc6paru3j/india-has-largest-number-of-malnourished-children-in-the-wor.html
    4
  6651. Crying? I think you're mistaking the Chinese coastguard water cannon blasts for tears.
    4
  6652.  @vghr6100  Is that you referring to yourself?
    4
  6653.  @ttomtkh  "神州 Shenzhou china is at war with all og its neighbour," Which country is China currently at war with? Not Vietnam, Not India (no formal declaration of war) not the whole of South East Asia, and most certainly not Pakistan of all countries. Chinese literally call Pakistan our iron brother (铁巴) because our bond is as strong as iron, so what are you talking about regarding Pakistan? As for African countries, there's a video on YouTube entitled: Gyude Moore: “China in Africa: An African Perspective” if you want to know how the Africans really feel about Chinese.
    4
  6654.  @51dbail  "神州 Shenzhou didn’t China steal there land from Genghis Khan if you think that way." China existed before Genghis Khan. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Genghis Khan's empire eventually crumbled.
    4
  6655. Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself before making such claims? Have you been on Chinese social media and seen what's written in the forums? As for Chinese going abroad, I'm sure everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands, as well as Chinese international students studying in your schools and universities, have you talked to these Chinese travelers yourself?
    4
  6656. ​ @catmandu6776  I believe I previously said something negative about China, that China has air pollution problems. But I choose to end it with China's solution, then why can't I give it a positive spin? On the other hand, you've been giving China a negative spin all this time, then like I said earlier, why the double standards when I portray something as good, and you portray something as bad? You said: "You mean when there wasn't a human being on the planet that knew anything about the effects of pollution?" I believe have never made such a statement, where did you get the idea that I made such a statement? I'm simply pointing out the fact that Western countries have been polluting the Earth since the Industrial Revolution around 1700-1800 AD, about 200-300 years ago, whereas China on the other hand began modernization in the last 50 years, since Deng's economic reforms in the late 1970s.
    4
  6657. +Cleric775 said: "All of the cultures and traditions destroyed after the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution." China is ranked 2nd in the world in number of UNESCO World Heritage sites (53 sites) only behind Italy/Rome at number 1 with 54 sites. Unless you are Italian, whichever country you are from, China has more world heritage sites than your country, The world's largest human migration is the Chinese New Year Migration Chunyun 春運 where Chinese return to our home provinces to celebrate our family reunion. This migration surpasses even the Western Christian migration, so why do you claim all the cultures and traditions are destroyed?
    4
  6658.  @DelightfulDiscs  Even if corruption existed within Yanukovych's administration, that was an internal matter for Ukrainians themselves to solve, not for the U.S and NATO to overthrow their government in a coup and to install their own government. And ever since the new administration, there have been genocide of ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Luhansk by neo-Nazis like the Azov battalion, and there's been shelling by both sides, resulting in the deaths of some 14,000 civilians in that region. What Putin meant by de-nazification is to get rid of the far right, ultra-nationalist, neo Nazis that's been killing ethnic Russians in those two regions, and if the Ukraine government won't agree to negotiate, then Putin will come knocking on the capital's doorstep. I agree that war is not a good option by any means, and hopefully the war will conclude as soon as possible with minimal loss of life.
    4
  6659. It's a combination of the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of the West being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West against China. Since the 19th Century, many have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the U.S someday in the foreseeable future, is too frightening for many to fathom.
    4
  6660.  @jtf873  Because people like you aren't listening to what the Russians, Chinese, North Koreans and Iranians have to say, that's why we have no voice. Also, could you explain why you believe shouldn't there be a ceasefire?
    4
  6661. These Uighurs are Chinese citizens, so what's wrong with teaching them Mandarin and teaching them Chinese history? Xinjiang is part of China so the government is educating Chinese citizens isn't it? Don't Americans also teach their kids English, and American history as well? If you ask Hawaiin kids which country they belong to, don't they reply with United States?
    4
  6662.  @voiceofreason6515  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwan's economy did not "stagnate" because of lack of freedom but because it became a mature economy." Firstly, I never implied Taiwan's economy stagnated because of a lack of freedom. Could you point out where did I ever said such a thing? What I said was that Taiwan's economy prospered under authoritarian single-party rule of the KMT. You said: "So much text yet so little wisdom on your part." So much blindness on your part, could you actually point out where did I ever implied Taiwan's economy stagnated because of a lack of freedom?
    4
  6663.  @voiceofreason6515  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. "The significance of China's example is not that it provides an alternative, but the demonstration that alternatives exist." - Eric X Li: A tale of two political systems
    4
  6664.  @maicholaa7482  You can't refute my points so you just label me wumao or 50 cents just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    4
  6665.  @maicholaa7482  What makes you think I'm controlled by the CPC? Because I bring up China's positive achievements?
    4
  6666.  @maicholaa7482  The official name of the party is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where Zhōngguó (中国) means China and Gòngchǎndǎng (共产党) means Communist Party, therefore, the correct name in English should be the Communist Party of China (CPC), not the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Because the official name has China in it.
    4
  6667. BRICS is more an economic alliance whereas NATO is more of a military alliance, so I'm not sure you can even compare NATO vs BRICS in the first place. Perhaps EU vs BRICS might be a better comparison.
    4
  6668. Some Chinese products leak out unfortunately? How about Western smartphones, computers, appliances, electronics, sneakers, toys, clothing branded with the "Made in China" logo?
    4
  6669.  Tom Collins  If nobody is afraid of China then why is there so much fear regarding China in the West?
    4
  6670.  @schmidcl77  You seem to care a lot.
    4
  6671.  @namelesssnitchy  Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands.
    4
  6672. +Daniel Vedberg Sekulic Its called "Socialism with Chinese characteristics" not "Communism with chinese character"
    4
  6673. Isn't Trump an example of a billionaire that's being silenced?
    4
  6674. What's happening to the comments? They aren't showing up on my screen.
    4
  6675. @@USA11111 Where are those American companies going to go to if not China? While the U.S has a market of 300 million consumers, if China can transform our population of 1.4 billion into consumers, then China would be the largest market in the world (if we aren't already.)
    4
  6676.  @laserraiset3300  The Communist Party has made poverty alleviation the forefront of China's policy, and according to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty; China's poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015, as measured by the percentage of people living on the equivalent of US$1.90 or less per day in 2011 purchasing price parity terms, which still stands in 2022.
    4
  6677.  @laserraiset3300  1.9 dollar per day is the World Bank's standard. And foreign companies didn't actually lift Chinese out of poverty. Chinese workers were paid very low wages, and earned 10 cents to every dollar of profit made by Apple or Nike. However, it was thanks to Communist Party policies like technology transfers and partnering foreign companies with local Chinese companies, that have lifted millions out of poverty in China (poverty as defined by World Bank).
    4
  6678. Michael S. About the car analogy, perhaps its not the broken tires at fault, but maybe the exhaust pipes produces lots of poisonous smoke (since you are highliting China's pollution and food poisoning). Ultimately China's goal is for the car to keep on moving (i.e. for China to keep on progressing). So the government will pay attention anything that helps the car to move, such as better engines, better tires, better car batteries, more passenger seats (which translate to better manufacturing, better technology, more houses, etc) and focus less on getting airbags, getting better exhaust pipes, etc. I mean, China has lots and lots of problems as a developing nation, so realistically, you can't expect the government to solve each and every problem. The government is allocating precious time, effort, manpower, materials and resources to only the most important problems (poverty, employment, education, housing, etc). All the relatively minor problems (food poisoning, pollution, etc) will have to take a backseat to the more pressing issues. I mean, regarding food poisoning, why not first ensure that everyone in China gets food to eat in the first place? Every problem is either serious or not serious with respect to other problems, and the government has to choose which problem to deal with first and which to put aside. Its sad but true, you can't solve every problem with your limited resources. You personally may not think their videos are very negative, but when is the last time laowhy or serpentza said anything good about China? They may proclaim "I love China" but if you look at their behavior, their mannerism and even their facial expressions, you can tell that they don't mean what they say when they like China. I mean, I have literally never seen laowhy and serpentza hang out with any Chinese friends (apart from their Chinese wives) They always hang out with other foreigners in China (and usually the same few people like Prozzie) There's nothing fundamentally wrong with that, but it gives off the impression that they aren't assimilating into China that's all. Its not me alone that feels this way. many other Chinese people have seen their videos and notice this particular trend. laowhy and serpentza post videos entitled "Are Chinese girls easy?" and "China's masculinity crisis" in order to attract people afflicted by yellow fever to come watch them.
    4
  6679.  @poxandblunder  Why don't you tell the Islamic countries don't be so cruel to non-believers? Why stone people to death for being gay? At least in China, the Uighurs are receiving a proper Chinese education so that they get a better chance in life, rather than get corrupted by extremist Islamic thoughts.
    4
  6680. Agreed, it's capitalism at work where Japanese government refuse to spend more money building storage or better treatment facilities. Because it's not profitable to do so. Also agree about the Western allies pressure. Outwardly, USA expressed support for Japan dumping irradiated Fukushima waters. But inwardly, USA has maintained a ban on imports of farming and seafood products from the region near Fukushima. Yet JaYoe Nation thinks Chinese are just being racist against Japanese, when the real two-faced racist outwards supports Japan, but inwardly bans seafood from Fukushima?
    4
  6681. China has Hypersonic missiles as well, like the DF-ZF which tested 7 times already, and travelling at speeds between 4,000 and 7,000 miles per hour, (or between Mach 5 and Mach 10) and can hit anywhere in the world in just 1 hour. Souce: China Successfully Tests Hypersonic Missile freebeacon.com/national-security/china-successfully-tests-hypersonic-missile/ The hypersonic missile is so fast that it can penetrate U.S anti-missile defenses and even interception missiles are too slow to catch up to the hypersonic glider's great velocity. Furthermore, the USA has to first detect the launch and scramble its ant-missile defenses within 1 hour of its launch in order to identify its target and intercept, making this missile very difficult to defend against.
    4
  6682.  @JTMaster  Ukraine made the claim only after Russia made the announcement that they had a fire on board.
    4
  6683. Many Filipinos tend to have "colonial mentality," displaying a preference for all things Anglo-Saxon, while harboring disdain for things that are "non-white", whom they view as inherently inferior. This "colonial lens" continues to influence how people view products made in China, when compared to products made in the West.
    4
  6684.  @weixu2057  Vaccines don't work all the time, look at Cyrus Janssen getting vaccinated, but still catching the Covid Omicron variant regardless. Furthermore, children below certain age aren't vaccinated because the vaccines haven't been approved for their age, so you can't just rely on vaccines and medications. The best step is to limit transmissions as much as possible, because each transmission of the virus increases the chances of mutation occurring and new strains emerging (that might be more transmissible and lethal than previous strains).
    4
  6685.  PTP120122  Why don't you answer my question then? I asked you "What makes you think I'm being paid to post these comments here?" but so far all you done is dodged my question. You didn't come here to refute my points? Then you come here and started talking to me for what? Yes, I'm in China and using VPN, but what's that even got to do with this discussion?
    4
  6686.  @new-york-city  Because he said positive achievements about China like bringing populations out of poverty? Why is anyone saying positive things about China considered a wumao?
    4
  6687.  @new-york-city  You said: "the ccp took all people into poverty. this is a fact." China's descent into the poverty started before the Communists even came to power. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    4
  6688. Some people tend to hate the ones they've wronged.
    4
  6689.  @ryanmeinecke8260  Look at the West and they are bending over backwards in order to accommodate Muslims immigrants. These refugees are fleeing their own conflict-ridden Islamic countries, and flooding the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France, etc, and instead of adapting to their predominantly Christian host countries, they continue their traditions, like Muslim men marrying multiple wives or Muslim women wearing Muslim headveil out in public. Secretly, many Westerners are angry that Muslims are under little pressure to assimilate into their host country, but they can't voice their true opinions for fear of being branded as "racists" (even though Islam is not a race) or "Islamophobe" because of the culture of "politically correctness" in the West. Whereas China has no qualms about taking necessary measures to ensure that Muslims in China respect China's laws and assimilate into Chinese culture, learn Chinese history and sing patriotic songs about China.
    4
  6690.  @V01DIORE  Those people starve to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Chairman Mao couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he'll wish for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    4
  6691. ​ @xXTUCXx1  "神州 Shenzhou I would never have expected someone like yourself to defend the Chinese regime...oh wait" You can attack China then why can't I defend China? Peng Shuai's previous affair with a much older man has been revealed and she wants to keep a low profile, that's why she's been avoiding the public eye. But WTA is demanding she appear in public, even though she has expressed the desire for personal privacy during the video call with IoC, then why can't WTA respect her wishes?
    4
  6692.  @editor4578  "神州 Shenzhou you are not defending China.... You are defending the sexual abuse of someone by a powerful person who then punishes the abused person for telling the truth." Could you point out where did Peng Shuai ever said she was sexually abused? I read Peng Shuai's translated post on Reddit, and it's apparent that she's had a tumultuous, on-and-off relation with a much older man, spanning several years, but where are the allegations of sexual assault in her post?
    4
  6693.  @bugsygoo  We have videos and pictures of Peng Shuai attending small gatherings and even IOC video call with Peng Shuai, where she expressed her desire for personal privacy. Yet the WTA is trying to politicize the issue by demanding her public appearance, instead of respecting her privacy.
    4
  6694.  @currentchannel3452  You claimed YouTube is banned in China, but nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    4
  6695. Jimmy Chaves Even if you personally don't eat soybeans yourself, it serves as animal feed, vital to industries like pig farms.
    4
  6696.  @PhiloSurfer  When people say "As a Chinese", they are alluding to the fact that they share an ancestral connection with the motherland that is China, and have familiarity with Chinese culture, such as Confucian family values (i.e filial piety, respect for elders). Yes, there are Chinese in Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, etc, but when "As a Chinese" is invoked, it means that the person is of Chinese descent and is familiar with Chinese culture.
    4
  6697.  @dedoshucos  Video: China's liquid oxygen-methane rocket engine completes key test youtu.be/-b3PocpWFgo The 80-tonne engine completed a full thrust test run with a duration of 100 seconds.
    4
  6698.  @Joeyknows924  "But none in Hawai is fighting a war to be independent from USA" The annexation of Hawaii was achieved through undemocratic ways. Before it happened, Native Hawaiian groups organized a mass petition drive hoping that if the U.S. government realized that the majority of native Hawaiian citizens opposed annexation, the move to annex Hawaii would be stopped. In the fall of 1897, a Petition Against Annexation was signed by 21,269 native Hawaiian people – more than half of the 39,000 native Hawaiians and mixed-blood persons reported by the Hawaiian Commission census that year. However, the pro-annexation forces in Congress submitted a proposal to annex the Hawaiian Islands by joint resolution, which required only a simple majority vote in both houses. This controversial approach eliminated the 2/3 majority needed to ratify a treaty. So in the end, Hawaii was undemocratically annexed.
    4
  6699.  @joelturley4847  Hey, why are you still using your phone/computer? You're the one wanting to decouple from China, why don't you begin with getting rid of your device?
    4
  6700.  @joelturley4847  Why are you still using your device? And here I thought you were all about decoupling from China, well why haven't you started by getting rid of your device?
    4
  6701. Chinese workers helped to build new roads, railways, infrastructure, schools, hospitals, hotels, shopping centres, football stadiums and telecommunication projects in Africa. Chinese investment has possibly done more to help Africa develop in decades, compared to what Westerners did in Africa for centuries
    4
  6702.  @TPELaoY  Clearly, the Chinese form of government enjoys certain advantages over the US's then what's wrong with acknowledging the advantages of the system if it works?
    4
  6703.  vlADOLF PUTLER  Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    4
  6704. The future of India is in Indian people's hands, not Chinese. Indians themselves have contributed many suggestions and ideas on how to govern India, but perhaps the problem lies with implementation, and turning those ideas into reality.
    4
  6705. Didn't President Trump slap tariffs on India (without going through proper World Trade Organization channels) and India is taking this complaint to the WTO? India takes U.S. steel tariffs complaint to the WTO Source:reuters (dot) com/article/us-usa-trade-india/india-takes-u-s-steel-tariffs-complaint-to-the-wto-idUSKCN1IO1WP
    4
  6706.  @MarkYeung1  A full boycott is more convincing. Look at the United States claiming that there are so-called "human rights violations" in Xinjiang, but then they still send athletes to Beijing in a half-assed boycott attempt. Why not just have a full boycott if the US is convinced of ongoing human rights violations in Xinjiang, instead of a half-assed boycott? Even worst, the Biden administration announced a diplomatic boycott, and the other 5 Eyes countries (i.e Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand) also jumped on to the boycott bandwagon, now the USA announced that they will be sending 18 officials to attend the Olympics. The USA is literally taking its allies for a ride.
    4
  6707.  @bartonlee3594  Cyrus Janssen allows people to comment freely on his channel, and his message is that if the U.S and China cooperate, then the whole world benefits. If U.S and China don't, then the whole world suffers.
    4
  6708. "Chinese social media started roasting her online"
    4
  6709. This issue is bilateral (country to country) issue between China and Bhutan, so why are Indian troops interfering at all? Both Bhutan and China were working on the issue bilaterally, then suddenly Indian troops crossed the border and entered Chinese territory. When Chinese government request Indian troops withdrawal for negotiations to continue, Indian government demands Chinese move back construction? India doesn't even claim Doklam/Donglong, so why are its troops there in the first place?
    4
  6710.  @jackcoolidge8123  Even Mike Pence praises China's unprecedented level of transparency, so what cover up are you talking about? Source: VP Mike Pence praises China's 'unprecedented level of transparency' on the coronavirus outbreak cnbc.com/2020/02/07/mike-pence-praises-china-unprecedented-coronavirus-transparency.html
    4
  6711.  Every Word Is A Made-Up Word  That's just the food is prepared. Watch this video about chefs boiling lobsters alive everyday and nobody complains because lobster is delicious when fresh. Video: Screaming Lobsters Boiled Alive youtu.be/nSMzMExEIMo (Warning: Footage may be disturbing for some viewers)
    4
  6712. Russia has not experienced any real need to resupply just about yet. Meanwhile, Ukraine is constantly asking for more tanks and fighters from NATO.
    4
  6713.  @schmidcl77  So you live in China? Which part of our vast country of China did you visit?
    4
  6714.  @YuuSHiiiN  It's true that former colonies that actually fought for their own independence are far less likely to suffer from the subservient "colonial mentality" that's a product of colonialism. But former British colonies like India were actually granted their independence (or in Hong Kong's case, return to mainland China in 1997) and thus they retain the colonial mentality, since they never had to fight for it.
    4
  6715.  @michaelkatz275  Taiwan's economy is stagnating, Taiwan's wages are stagnant, their cost of living is rising, and Taiwan graduates are leaving the island and seeking job opportunities elsewhere, such as in mainland China or Singapore. As for mainland China, we are a major engine driving economic growth in the world, how exactly is China stagnating?
    4
  6716.  @happyhappynuts  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, Australia should be suspicious of USA rather China, given their warmongering history.
    4
  6717.  @blitz12399  What's Russia selling weapons to South American countries even got to do with this? Whataboutism on your part? The fact is that Nato was sending arms to Ukraine, even if its Soviet-era weapons.
    4
  6718.  @blitz12399  Also, since according to you, Zelenskyy made many requests which have been denied numerous times, just goes to show that there was a back-and-forth (hence a discussion) going on.
    4
  6719.  @blitz12399  "Lol, you think Zelensky didn’t press hard enough for Nukes?" You did mention that Zelenskyy's many requests had been denied numerous times. Who knows, perhaps it could succeed one day given enough tries.
    4
  6720. @Tenzin Dhondup What genocide of Tibetan language? Here's video of Tibetan singer Alan 阿蘭(阿兰) singing the song 《青藏高原》 Tibetan Plateau 藏/中文版 Tibetan and Chinese version youtu.be/jJfCI3FL9WI Did you know that the 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and a traitor to his people? The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government (Beijing). Declassified CIA files have exposed that a total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) Source: CIA Tibetan program wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Costs So here we have concrete evidence that the 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the USA to engage in separatist activities against the Central People's Government. What environmental destruction? Chinese workers build hydroelectric powerstations in Tibet to supply clean, renewable energy to Tibetan homes for warmth during chilling winters, electricity for lighting, appliances and electronics. Here's a List of hydroelectric powerstations in Tibet Autonomous Region: Ngari Hydro Power Station[1] 阿里水电站 Pangduo Hydro Power Station[2] 旁多水电站 Zhikong Hydro Power Station 直孔水电站 Bayu Hydro Power Station 巴玉水电站 Dagu Hydro Power Station 大古水电站 Jiexu Hydro Power Station 街需水电站 Zangmu Hydro Power Station 藏木水电站 Jiacha Hydro Power Station 加查水电站 Lengda Hydro Power Station 冷达水电站 Zhongda Hydro Power Station 仲达水电站 Langzhen Hydro Power Station 朗镇水电站 Changbo Hydro Power Station 昌波水电站 Suwalong Hydro Power Station 苏洼龙水电站 Batang Hydro Power Station 巴塘水电站 Lawa Hydro Power Station 拉哇水电站 Yebatan Hydro Power Station 叶巴滩水电站 Boluo Hydro Power Station 波罗水电站 Yanbi Hydro Power Station 岩比水电站 Gangtuo Hydro Power Station 岗托水电站 ... Source: List of hydroelectric powerstations in Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region#Hydroelectric
    4
  6721.  @linmuxi  "Shenzhou. Looking back to look forward" Well, then India has had 20 years to develop its domestic companies, just like China.
    4
  6722.  @bartonlee3594  Such a detailed analysis of China's economic situation coming from you. Perhaps The Economist, Bloomberg, NYT, etc should engage you to write their next headline of China's impending "hard landing" in 2024. I'll be sure to include it in my list and credit your name as well.
    4
  6723.  @bartonlee3594  Navalny himself wasn't even popular in Russia. According to surveys only 19% of Russians approve of what he did, but the majority, 56% of Russians disapprove of what he did.
    4
  6724.  @bartonlee3594  "You should get credit where credit is due." But the Western jounal's headlines about China have been proven consistently wrong for over 30 years. What credit is there to be given?
    4
  6725.  @bartonlee3594  Navalny died of a blood clot, who said he was deliberately killed? If anything, he was actually slated to be exchanged in the prisoner swap between US and Russia.
    4
  6726.  @rufanuf1  "神州 Shenzhou We have a saying in "the west". Absolute power corrupts absolutely"." But throughout human history, most human societies gravitated towards authoritarian forms of government, where political power is not in the hands of many, but instead concentrated in the hands of the few, be it the nobles (aristocracy), priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy). It's because these few people were educated and politically savvy enough to make political decisions for the whole country, while the ignorant masses were kept far away from politics. In fact, democracy itself wasn't even popular outside of Greece/Rome among the other ancient civilizations. Most countries adopted some form of authoritarian rule, like the examples I've given earlier.
    4
  6727.  @rufanuf1  You said: "The idea of China or Russia taking up that role chills me to the bone, because there answer to policing nations will be simply to annex them..." China has never intended to be the global police, and from what I know, neither has Russia. At the most, both China and Russia want is for return of historical territory that was originally China's or Russia's, such as Taiwan or Crimea. It's funny how you conveniently overlook the US wars while projecting them onto China or Russia instead. It's boils down to a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of being overrun by Asians) mindset that's fueling Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiment in the West today. Otherwise, for what reason would you harbor such negative attitudes towards Russia and China?
    4
  6728. @Mwaniki Mwaniki How is World Health Organization in the pocket of China? The USA (the biggest WHO contributor) contributes $400 million to WHO, whereas China contributed only $40 million to WHO, yet Trump says WHO is China centric? How is WHO in China's pocket when USA is its largest funder?
    4
  6729. @frankiebegbie Explain how does keeping the corporations in check benefit Xi Jinping.
    4
  6730.  Salvador Tubigan  About the South China Sea, the North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    4
  6731.  @Orangejuicess  Why make assumptions that she's never been to China, or that she's writing off China's government? Based off a single line? She has clarified her own opinions about the Chinese government, but you seem convinced to preach to the choir.
    4
  6732.  @dwaynebarnaby3598  China is home to world's longest range ICBM, the DongFeng-41 (DF-41 东风-41) which has an operational range between 12,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the range of the US LGM-30 Minuteman which has a reported range of 13,000 km. Video: /watch?v=h2kjMctT8yU?t=14
    4
  6733. Good foreign policy should begin at home. Chinese philosopher Confucius said that "The strength of a nation derives from the strength of the home.” If your own country's internal affairs are in disorder, then how is a country to comment on another's internal affairs? It's best to sort out domestic affairs first before moving on to foreign policy.
    4
  6734. According to eyewitnesses, nothing happened at Tiananmen Square June 1989, other than a military unit entering and asking those remaining to leave the Square. Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053
    4
  6735.  @duckie4495  Exactly. By Zelensky refusing to surrender, he's prolonging the war unnecessarily and putting more Ukrainian lives at risk. By arming the civilians with rifles and rocket launchers, Zelensky is attempting to maximize the number of civilian casualties. By removing the age limits for conscription, Zelensky is effectively enlisting child solders to fight and die for his refusal to surrender.
    4
  6736.  @etienne8382  Agreed. China is Australia's biggest trading partner, yet the AUKUS deal has convinced Australia to treat its biggest trading partner as an adversary.
    4
  6737. It's not racism, even overseas Chinese returning to China (because they just don't feel safe in the West right now) are subjected to mandatory 14 day quarantine. Both Chinese and foreigners are equal under the law in China.
    4
  6738. But the emperor kept at least a copy each book burned untouched in the imperial libraries. Anyway, burnt books can always be rewritten isn't it? Books are just physical medium to store knowledge that's all.
    4
  6739. Hong Kong has never had an army of its own. While it was a British colony, it enjoyed British army protection. Then after the handover of Hong Kong to mainland China, it now enjoys the protection of People's Liberation Army (world's largest land army). So Hong Kong don't have to spend a single cent on a defense budget, thanks to PLA, and they can allocate money into building its economy.
    4
  6740. As the country with world's largest population, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses after all.
    4
  6741.  Giovanni Sanchez  China had a well-developed musical culture as early as the Zhou dynasty (1122 BC – 256 BC). Ancient Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. And like I said, trousers were invented in China. The oldest known trousers were found at the Yanghai cemetery in Turpan, Xinjiang, western China and dated to the period between the 10th and the 13th centuries BC. So isn't it Westerners copying Chinese trousers for themselves?
    4
  6742.  @FullPerspective  So since Iceland was part of Denmark in WW2 and that Denmark was involved in WW2, that means Iceland was involved in WW2 since it's part of Denmark. "You have a disturbing definition of peace if you think peace is just about not declaring war," A country is at peace if it is not at war with another country, how's this a "disturbing definition" in the first place? "The fact that your standard of peace means so much less, is a indication of lack of peace and quality of life." Who are you to define the standard of peace in the first place? And have you been to China in the first place, before talking about the so-called "lack of peace" and "quality of life" here?
    4
  6743.  @FullPerspective  "If you and your country was truly peaceful, then you would not try to argue for the word peace to mean LESS than what it currently does." China is indisputably at peace and has not declared war with any country. Why then do you constantly try and paint my country as not being at peace? All those conflicts you attempt to smear China with, it turns out that China and India have not declared war with each other, and neither is China at war with any of the other claimants in the South China Sea. If anything, it looks as though you are the one unable to adjust to the idea of China being at peace, so you try to change the definition of peace in order to justify your believe that China is not at peace. "You would argue for the word to mean MORE." China has clearly met the requirements for being at peace. But it's apparent that you cannot accept it, that's why you are trying to artificially "raise the standard" of peace, so that China falls into the category of "not being at peace."
    4
  6744.  @FullPerspective  You said: "I DID NOT DEFINE THE STANDARD OF PEACE A DICTIONARY DID," The dictionary defined the meaning of the word peace, but it's you who attributed a higher standard to the term. Are you telling me you don't know the difference between definition and standard? Then who are you to boast about your English proficiency while taking every opportunity to mock me for mine? China clearly fits the most basic definition of peace, in which a country is not at war with another, but its you who choose to elevate the standard of peace to frankly unrealistic levels. I mean, no country in the world fits the first definition of "free from disturbance; tranquil" because countries constantly interact with the world and with each other, which inevitably produces disturbances. You said: "Shenzhou. Claiming China is PEACEFUL IS A CONCEPT OF FICTION!!!" Firstly, such a statement coming from you only serves to reinforce the fact that "Animal Farm" and "1984" are works of fiction, and that George Orwell is first and foremost a novelist, carefully constructing alternative realities that exist only in fiction, and then posing such stories as a critique of real world ideologies. And secondly, I've already presented arguments previously to prove this statement of yours false. You said: "Hypocrite! This is the kind of behavior which is why people do not want to be Chinese or live in China, like the behavior I see with so many Americans and Russians too, this dogmatic know it all attitude without actually investigating anything," Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself? Have you actually done any investigation before making all those claims about China without research? If anything, then perhaps it's you who have such an know-it-all attitude without having actually been here.
    4
  6745.  Current Channel  Even if Huawei "die", there's still Xiaomi, ZTE, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, and so on. But if Apple "die" which company is going to replace that American smartphone monopoly?
    4
  6746. @golden retreiver Video: The Point: Are media exaggerating fears over new Mandarin classes in Inner Mongolia? youtu.be/B4yvxz0cehg
    4
  6747. Many Indians (but not all) still suffer from the "colonial mentality" which continues to afflict many former colonies long after decolonization. It is this mentality that causes many in India to lash out at China. Even though the British have since left India, the "decolonization of the mind" needs more time to heal the mental damage. Only when the mind is decolonized, can India be truly free of its colonial past.
    4
  6748. During wartime, China can always make more tanks, fighters, ammunition and military equipment to replace losses, (even if they don't last long). But India has to rely on purchasing foreign weapons from countries like Russia and USA. If these countries suddenly decide to raise prices of their military wares, India will have no choice but to accept those prices to buy their equipment.
    4
  6749. Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have had a major impact on their respective fields. Paper and Printing make the transcribing and transmission of knowledge much easier. The Compass made navigation in bad weather conditions without Sun/stars much easier. And Gunpowder has revolutionized warfare.
    4
  6750. Agreed. Instead of right or wrong, it should be a scientific approach, through experimentation to find which method is the most suitable for the country involved.
    4
  6751.  @sallyandersen8729  Where's the post made by Peng Shuai on Weibo? Even CNN is unable to independently verify this claim then how can you proceed without any proof? Peng Shuai wants her privacy to be respected, that's why she's been trying to keep a low profile, but Western media are behaving like a paparazzi and trying to expose her private life for all the world to see. Why don't Western organisations respect Peng Shuai's right to privacy?
    4
  6752.  @woa2193  How is China a threat to democracy? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    4
  6753.  @santosturmio8189  New? Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? It's already embarrassing that Peng Shuai's previous relationship with a much older man has been exposed, that's why she wants to keep a low profile and avoid the public eye. But Western MSM are behaving like the paparazzi and trying to dig up details of her private life for all the world to see.
    4
  6754.  @bartonlee3594  In your post, you've misquoted the last line. Below is the correct last line: "Our dear friend from afar, China is forever a home away from home for you, and we all love you ‘cause you always feel at home in China."
    4
  6755.  @cchannel7857  Search for an article: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies (By Gregory Clark)
    4
  6756.  @chuckpioneer1783  Oftentimes when you hear scandals about user data leaks or privacy breaches, most of the time it's Western social media like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram that have been caught leaking/selling their users data.
    4
  6757.  @michaelkatz275  "神州 Shenzhou Then why are one million young men leaving Russia now that Putin has decided to mobilize?" You're saying 1,000,000 young men are leaving Russia? Where do they go? Which neighboring country has been swamped by these Russian men?
    4
  6758. Trade numbers doesn't tell everything like you said. China-India trade amounts to 136 billion dollars last year whereas China-Pakistan trade is 23 billion dollars in 2021. Yet there's no doubt that Pakistan is a far more important partner to China than India.
    4
  6759.  @MarkYeung1  "i agree with most of the Taiwanese prefer the status quote, with good reason. However, warmonger Beijing has a different view. They don't put the Taiwanese people under considerations." If Beijing don't put the people of Taiwan under consideration, then why is Beijing allowing the current status quo to continue? Since you agreed that most of the people in Taiwan prefer the status quo, then isn't Beijing considering the feelings of the people of Taiwan by allowing it to continue?
    4
  6760.  @henrytep8884  You said: "Wumao I’m not going to argue or debate over this," Why are you now resorting name-calling and hurling personal insults against me, just because my views happen to differ from yours? Since you know that the geopolitical situation is complicated, why are you jumping to conclusions like claiming China is "stealing fish" from the Philippines? Yet when I ask you which fish did China steal from the Phillipines, you label me a wumao?
    4
  6761.  @henrytep8884  That Chinese fisherman was fishing within the Exclusive Economic Zone, how is that stealing? Yet you've been accusing China of stealing fish from the Phillippines but instead of answering my question, you demand that I answer your questions?
    4
  6762.  @MarkYeung1  "The problem is, the voters who elect the politicians don't like China, and they are willing to express their feelings." This anti-China sentiment has been inorganically cultivated among the voters, through the Western MSM's negative portrayal of China and demonizing our country to their Western audiences. It's become apparent that Western institutions of democracy are crumbling from within, and because many Western governments are unable to solve their own domestic problems, they find ways to redirect blame away from themselves, and a convenient "scapegoat" (i.e China) to pin the blame on. This has lead to increased anti-China sentiment among voters, although China is not the cause of their own failing system's problems. You said: "China can and should improve its age abroad. The recent crackdown on democracy and freedoms in Hong Kong do help." So you think the mainland's actions in Hong Kong do help improve it's image abroad? I'm glad that you admitted such. The problem is that many Western audiences (but not all) don't seem to see it that way.
    4
  6763. Ukraine has been supporting ultra-nationlists and neo-Nazis like the Azov Battalion, that's been shelling Donetsk and Luhansk (collectively known as Donbas) for 8 years and having killed some 13,000 civilians in the region. Russia is not starting a war, it's ending the war started since 2014 after the coup d'etat of Ukraine's government by USA and NATO forces.
    4
  6764.  @xxxcool2565  What killing millions in Xinjiang? The population of Uighurs in China has actually grown from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China Yet the Western allegations of Uighur genocide still persist? When the population of Uighurs in China actually tripled in size over the years?
    4
  6765.  @zackk4393  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    4
  6766.  @zackk4393  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"? Video: Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' youtu.be/DPt-zXn05ac
    4
  6767.  @zackk4393  Synopsis: The story was inspired from a fiction entitled “Diary of a madman” written by Nikolai Gogol in 1834. As the title suggests, the story outlines a diary written by a madman. The allegory was conveyed by a first-person narrator. source:wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Madman%27s_Diary#Synopsis
    4
  6768.  @christophercooper2208  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China has actually grown from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China Yet the Western allegations of Uighur genocide still persist? When the population of Uighurs in China actually tripled in size over the years?
    4
  6769.  @amc3463  Ukraine had been shelling and killing some 13,000 people in the Donbas region over the course of 8 years. Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that began since the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukovych by USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine. If Zelenskyy truly cared about the lives of Ukrainians, he would surrender, because NATO and USA aren't going to send troops to defend Ukraine and Ukraine has literally been abandoned (as Zelenskyy said). But by refusing to surrender, Zelenskyy is only prolonging the war to maximise the civilian casualties. By releasing prisoners and arming civilians with rifles, he's sowing chaos and trying to maximise the civilian casualties. By removing the age restrictions for conscription, Zelenskyy is effectively enlisting child soldiers to fight and die for his refusal to surrender.
    4
  6770.  @rpg1663  "神州 Shenzhou Again, I'm not talking about the past LOL." You were. You said: "Why wonder why nowadays people don't speak Japanese in China hahahah.. Oh wait... USA gave China a hand before." and that was clearly referencing the Sino-Japanese War, and I've already explained that China stood a chance against Japan, and even you admitted that USA got involved after Pearl Harbor. You said: "I'm saying if China was Ukraine right now being attacked by a much larger force," The People's Liberation Army is literally the largest army in the world, what force could be much larger than the PLA? You said: "And yes, so far they're winning due to many countries help, not just NATO countries as you mention." If Ukraine was truly winning, then why is Zelenskyy desperately calling for NATO to impose a No-Fly-Zone over Ukraine? Why is Zelenskyy constantly asking for more lethal aid instead of humanitarian aid, if he truly cared about the lives of Ukrainians? It's because Zelenskyy want's to use civilians as a human shield, that's why he's prolonging the war to maximise the civilian casualties, yet you still think Ukraine is winning when it constantly needs more aid? You said: "Such war costs millions every hour.. Russia can't hold much longer" In fact just recently the Russian ruble actually increased in value after the initial plunging because of the torrent of sanctions against Russia, so NATO's plan to sanction Russia into oblivion has apparently failed. Secondly, oil prices are skyrocketing through the roof, and Russia is a major oil and gas supplier (especially to Western Europe) so won't Russia be making more money off gas sales?
    4
  6771.  @Guitar6ty  Well, that's because the Nordstream pipeline supplying Russian gas to Europe has been destroyed.
    4
  6772.  @tonglong1647  The United Kingdom was colonial superpower in 19th century, but was eventually overtaken by United States in 20th century. But prior to that, China (and also India) had been economic superpowers for 1800 years, and our GDP made up 25%-30% of the world's GDP, according to world leading British economist, Angus Maddison. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA_Middle_East.png And if you follow the above trend, it looks as though China is set to dominate the 21st century.
    4
  6773. Even baby formula is in short supply at the moment in the U.S.
    4
  6774. Westerners also made use of Chinese military inventions, like the crossbow and especially gunpowder. But do Chinese people complain about Westerns using our military technology?
    4
  6775. go to hell = 去见鬼吧
    4
  6776. NATO is the Hare, throwing out sanctions and eventually exhausting their options before reaching the finish line, all the while mocking Russia for being slow. Russia is the Tortoise, making slow but steady progress towards the finish line.
    4
  6777. Aggressive China? China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    4
  6778. 其实有些是美分，在评论里喷中国。
    4
  6779.  @zackk4969  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"? Video: Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' youtu.be/DPt-zXn05ac
    4
  6780.  @MarkYeung1  Australia's previous PM Scott Morrison was anti-China in his stance, and this worsened the Australia-China relationship. But Australians have elected a new PM, Anthony Albanese and we might just see Australia-China relationship begin to mend with this new PM.
    4
  6781.  @MarkYeung1  So you're implying that Australians are unhappy with Morrison's anti-China stance? Then hopefully the new Australian PM Albanese will improve Australia-China relations. We shall see. You said: "Only some Chinese can have the same rights as Australians. Do you know that?" Likewise, Chinese have rights that some Australians don't. For example, drinking in public in Australia is illegal in many parts of the country, whereas in China, you can drink in public and/or walk around with an open bottle/can of alcoholic beverage, and nobody will come arrest you. Do you know that?
    4
  6782. Wet Markets provide fresh food and produce at affordable prices to people in China and many other countries in Asia, Africa and South America also have wet markets too. So why should China close our wet markets?
    4
  6783. Facebook has been caught red-handed, selling their users private information away. Yet millions of people still continue using Facebook regardless.
    4
  6784.  @garygraham8373  Again, Chairman Mao did not set out to murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood. In 1958, the Yellow River flooded that coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. In July 1958, the peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 m3/s (790,000 cu ft/s) with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kg/m3 (57 lb/cu ft), 14× and 24× their mean annual values, respectively. The flood water level was so high that it rose up to the top of the levee in several places. This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. It was reported as the most severe flood since 1933. Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/1958_Yellow_River_flood
    4
  6785. China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    4
  6786. Hong Kong is perhaps the most cyberpunk place in the world and throughout the 80s and 90s, has been prominently featured in tpopular and influential Cyberpunk films like Bladerunner and Ghost In the Shell (even though the latter is Japanese anime). Video: Why is Hong Kong the Perfect Setting for Cyberpunk? youtube.com/watch?v=G93eQ9HXNdg But in the modern times, perhaps Shenzhen in the mainland can compete with Hong Kong for being the most Cyberpunk city.
    4
  6787.  @Charles-tt3jr  You said: "China does not fund ngos anywhere on this planet, we can see what you are trying to do!" Well, do you consider the Confucius Institutes (孔子学院) as NGOs?
    4
  6788. I think the American Service-Members' Protection Act applies only to US military personnel, so Netanyahu doesn't qualify?
    4
  6789.  @yslee1401  You're saying that Meng's father built a 50m long tunnel through Canadian soil, to reach the US consular in Vancouver? How wacky is your conspiracy theory getting?
    4
  6790.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Ya think China don't have no monogarchical industries, too?" Did I ever said that? All I did was point out that China's government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, reining them in when they gone too far, and cracking down on any anti-competitive practices by them (i.e Alibaba, Tencent, Didi...) This allows smaller Chinese firms who would have otherwise been unable to compete with the big giants, to emerge and compete with them, possibly promoting innovation through competition in the process. However, we don't get that with American monopolies. In the U.S, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    4
  6791. Taiwan wasn't even listed as a destination on Pelosi's itinerary, she actually had to sneak into Taiwan.
    4
  6792.  @himanshugurjar9002  "神州 Shenzhou U have a poor understanding of india. Indians r not pro US. And pakistan is in no way any brother." Indians and Pakistani are blood brothers that shared the same history (even British colonization) right up to the partition of British India in 1947. It's sad that because of colonial mentality, that this brotherhood between Pakistani and Indians is being weakened. You said: "Our primary identity is not on race but civilization." Pakistani and Indians were from the same civilization after all. If you're unable to see it, it's because the colonial mentality has clouded your vision so.
    4
  6793.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "I live in Canada. Chinese Canadians are generally well treated here." An article published by Bloom berg has declared Vancouver the Anti-Asian Hate Crime Capital of North America, having experienced a 700% increase in crimes against Asians.
    4
  6794.  @Daylightmotion  Education? China has is a top destination for international students and as of 2013, China is the most popular country in Asia for international students, and ranks 3rd overall among countries. Source: China ranks 3rd among countries that host the most international students, usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/2013/10/08/explore-the-worlds-top-universities
    4
  6795.  @Daylightmotion  Because it is illegal to protest in Singapore. According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore hrw.org/asia/singapore Singapore’s political environment is stifling. Citizens face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. In 2017, the country tightened the already strict limits on public assemblies contained in the Public Order Act, which requires police permits for any “cause-related” assembly outside the closely monitored “Speakers’ Corner.” Now doesn't that sound exactly like China?
    4
  6796.  @87aggietim  If the US wants fair trade then why is USA slapping sanctions on Iran, sanctions on Russia, sanctions on North Korea, sanctions on Venezuela, and virtually every country that opposes it. The US also slap tariffs on China too which is hurting American companies and farmers who bear the brunt of the US-China trade war. China always advocate that there are no winners in a trade war, only losers. And who says China don't help USA? China buys about 1.2 trillion dollars ($1,200,000,000,000) worth of U.S debt to help Americans tide over the 2008 financial crisis, so how exactly is USA propping up China?
    4
  6797. You can also say that the cold weather countries (like Russia) don't have the warm weather to train for the Summer Olympics?
    4
  6798.  @timpetrie5811  俄罗斯长冬短夏... Even though Russia summer can be hot, it lasts only for a short moment compared to winter.
    4
  6799.  @EzraFieldsofStrawberry  The genocide narrative by the West is false. The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    4
  6800.  @fukushimaisrevelation2817  What you are describing sounds straight out of Scientology. China's transformation from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into an economic juggernaut today, as well as the world's factory, was through sheer hard work and perseverance. There's a Chinese proverb that "There are no heroes who fall from the sky, only ordinary people who step forth." (世上没有从天而降的英雄，只有挺身而出的凡人) that describes Chinese belief in working hard to achieve results, not relying on some other entity to save us.
    4
  6801.  @fukushimaisrevelation2817  I believe that ultimately, it is your own hands that shape the reality, not prayer and belief in an unproven entity. I agree that pollution is a byproduct of industrial development, but Western countries have been polluting the Earth since 200-300 years ago since the Industrial Revolution began in 1700-1800s. Whereas China only recently industrialised some 50 years ago in comparison. But just as there was once poor air quality in the West during the Industrial Revolution, their air has largely cleared up and China's air quality is bound to improve eventually. About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs.
    4
  6802.  @youcantalwaysgetwhatyouwan6687  Traditionally, the currency of the country with the world's largest economy (i.e the U.S.A and the U.S Dollar) becomes the global reserve, so it's possible the Chinese Renminbi might someday replace the U.S dollar if China's economy overtakes the US's. Also, Mandarin Chinese is the most spoken language in the world by number of speakers, and is speculated to grow in popularity as China's economy rises. And what makes you think Chinese citizens are closed off? Before 2019, literally everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending coin on your tourist industry. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topic as their peers.
    4
  6803.  @tiarnan9793  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate grew from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat, considering that China is world's most populous country, yet achieving 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy rate. Source: Wikipedia: Poverty in China
    4
  6804.  @David-og7di  "神州 Shenzhou Yup, he's just playing the good guy doing charitable deeds." Cyrus Janssen positive message is clear, that he wants continued peace between USA and China. Because everyone can see the deteriorating US-China relations between our countries that could potentially result in war (which would be a disaster for the entire world) so shouldn't we try to avoid the worst scenario? Cyrus is helping avoid war by promoting understanding of China, isn't that something to be celebrated?
    4
  6805.  @tubbytuber  Cyrus' message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" is a positive message for the world, because everyone can see the deteriorating US-China relations between our countries that could possibly lead to a war (which is in nobody's interests, except perhaps the U.S military-industrial complex). But people like serpentza and c-milk are trying to spread malice and hate towards China, so as to justify America's stance in entering a possible war scenario with China, and people like you are falling into this trap.
    4
  6806.  @NanningPunk2025  How? He's just shown that he did not accept any money from CGTN, then why are you labelling him a shill when he presented evidence that he isn't?
    4
  6807.  Maria Aldery  Cyrus Janssen is clearly concerned about the deteriorating US-China relations between our countries and is worried it could lead to potential war. His message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" is a positive message that should be celebrated rather than the warmongering Western MSM, yet you're calling him a traitor for his peaceful message?
    4
  6808.  @EstanislaoSantino-xk8uz  Go ahead. You're always welcome to post comments, but why'd you seemingly replied to me for no apparent reason?
    4
  6809. Agreed with the concept of mind colonization. A ‘colonial mentality' (or ‘the colonized mind’) shows a preference or desirability for whiteness and cultural values, behaviors, physical appearances and objects from or derivative of the ‘West’ (i.e. Western Europe or the USA), with disdain or undesirability for anything coming from the non- ‘West’. Although many former colonies have since physically decolonized, the "decolonization of the mind" needs to happen in order for a country to truly break free of it's colonial past.
    4
  6810.  @real_dddf  Under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Life expectancy at birth under Mao nearly doubled from 35-40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al. 1984; Coale1984; Jamison 1984; Banister 1987; Ravallion 1997; Banister and Hill 2004). Infant Mortality rate of China under Mao was halved, and illiteracy was halved. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%. China’s literacy success has been described as “perhaps the single greatest educational effort in human history” (Peterson, 1997).
    4
  6811.  @real_dddf  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" ROC China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the PRC in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    4
  6812.  @farzana6676  Why accuse me of being a 50c wumao? Just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    4
  6813. USA is involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War in the Middle East and is cutting off those countries heads (Muammar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, etc) and then installing their own US puppets in place. Now USA is bombing Syria and the Assad Regime is next on the list.
    4
  6814. Half Truth? Which part of my statement is untrue then?
    4
  6815. Just a simple suggestion to improve the title, instead of using Putin (country's leader) and China (country) in the title, it might be better to use either "Putin and Xi" (both countries' leaders) or "Russia and China" (both countries) or perhaps even "Moscow and Beijing" (both countries' capitals) to appear more professional.
    4
  6816.  Gaylord Manlove  Why was Meng Wanzhou arrested when she didn't break any Canadian laws while in Canada? And she was arrested in 2018 and its already 2021, so what have Canadian police been doing for 3 years?
    4
  6817.  @bjrnhjortshjandersen1286  Just for clarification, are you talking about Lenin having a much more sinister character than his peaceful appearance may suggest, or are you perhaps referring to Patrick Lancaster?
    4
  6818. Some Americans died from carbon monoxide poisoning. The lack of heating meant that Americans kept the car engine running while in the garage, eventually filling the house with poisonous carbon monoxide.
    4
  6819. China is a civilization to be studied, not lectured at.
    4
  6820.  @first8956  Olympics should be about sports, not politics. The IOC video call clearly showed that Peng Shuai is fine and she wants her privacy to be respected. But Western media would have none of this and they are determined to expose her private life for the world to see (kinda like the paparazzi)
    4
  6821.  @rsdch  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability.
    4
  6822. Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors (just ask the expats here). However, many Westerners (but not all) are increasing regarding Chinese in their lands as unwelcome.
    4
  6823. Cyrus' message is all about building bridges, not walls between the US and China. If US and China cooperate, then the whole world benefits, so isn't this video a positive message for the world?
    4
  6824. In the US, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US political system. Whereas China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's political system.
    4
  6825.  @robezy0  What happens when asymptomatic cases spread twice? For example, Alice is asymptomatic carrier and spreads it to Betty, who is also asymptomatic and spreads it to Carie, who starts exhibiting symptoms. Then contact tracing might reveal Betty to be asymptomatic, but may completely miss Alice who is also asymptomatic.
    4
  6826. This is what Western economists been saying about China since 1990s 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? But its already 2018 and China's economy is still going strong, so its clear that Western propaganda is simply biased against China that's all and been consistently proven wrong for almost 30 years. So why do you still believe China will crash soon?
    4
  6827.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "You don't need a referendum to join an alliance." BRICS is not an alliance, Unlike NATO, BRICS members are under no obligation to come to the aid of each other's defense. Joining an alliance means your country has to dedicate money, military equipment and manpower to aid another, yet is Finland or Sweden willing to do that if say NATO involves itself in another war?
    4
  6828.  @MarkYeung1  NATO is NOT a defensive alliance. For example, in 1999 NATO had bombed Yugoslavia even though no NATO country was attacked and Article 5 wasn't activated. Also, Ukraine is most certainly not a member of NATO, yet NATO countries are sending military aid to Ukraine.
    4
  6829.  @MarkYeung1  "Shenzhou. Finland was dominated by Soviet (and subsequent Russia) political influence since World War 2. The unipolar involvement is not anymore." Clearly, Finland maintained a position of neutrality in the aftermath of World War 2. But after the USSR dissolved in 1990s, Finland abandoned it's neutrality and joined EU and now NATO. Therefore, Finland has gone from being neutral to reinforcing the unipolar world by joining NATO.
    4
  6830.  @MarkYeung1  "The only time article 5 was invoked was during 911 attack in 2001. It was an UNDECLARED war." The US clearly declared the "War on Terror" (officially the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) following 911, how was it an undeclared war? Also, the Middle East wasn't in North Atlantic either, yet the Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, etc, still happened.
    4
  6831.  @garyyoung3179  Since you said there's no obligation for NATO members to involve themselves in any military operation, then what's the point of Finland and Sweden joining NATO? Had Finland and Sweden remained outside of NATO, then Russia would not be wary of them. Instead, by joining NATO, Finland and Sweden has made Russia suspicious of them, so is this really a good move on Finland and Sweden's part?
    4
  6832. I've been to Singapore before and there's some anti-China sentiment in Singapore. When I speak Mandarin, some Singaporeans can the detect mainland accent and they treat me coldly. But when I open my mouth and speak English, many Singaporeans start warming up to me. I would probably say that on the whole, Singapore is about 50% pro-China and the remaining anti-China.
    4
  6833.  @rais1953  If you're for restoring relationships between Australia and China, then Australia purchasing a fleet of nuclear submarines from the U.S (under the AUKUS arrangement) is setting a dangerous precedent because it would allow nuclear states to transfer weapons-grade nuclear materials to a non-nuclear state for the first time, in possible violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty.
    4
  6834.  @andrenogueira5058  The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (Chinese: 中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议; Tibetan: བོད་ཞི་བས་བཅིངས་འགྲོལ་འབྱུང་ཐབས་སྐོར་གྱི་གྲོས་མཐུན་དོན་ཚན་བཅུ་བདུན་) in 1951, affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there's this legally binding document signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging that Chinese rule over Tibet. Source: Wikipedia: Seventeen Point Agreement Even today, when you draw up the Map of the People's Republic of China, Tibet is clearly regarded as part of China. Even during the UN summits, the U.S, Australia, Canada, U.K, France, Germany, India, Japan, Korea, etc, all recognize Tibet as part of China.
    4
  6835. It's like an incestuous cycle of inbreeding by the same few previously-debunked sources like Adrian Zenz and ASPI, that's sustaining the Uighur genocide narrative in the West. Just a poke and the whole narrative collapses like a house of cards.
    4
  6836. +Ranvir Singh Pakistan and China share similar interests so why building a base considered blindfolding Pakistan? Doesn't India also have Surket Base in Nepal and also Farkhor base in Tajikistan? What about USA having military bases in South Korea, Okinawa Japan and Philippines? Are all those countries blindfolded because they host other countries military bases? No, it's for strategic purposes only.
    4
  6837. +Ranvir Singh Firstly, in the world of business, not every business transaction is automatically successful. Hambantota port was in debt, because Sri Lankan government choose to borrow excessively from China, without thinking of paying off the loan. China did not force Sri Lankan leader to borrow money, we only dispersed loans as requested. What makes you think Chinese people aren't concentrating our attention on improving our living standards? According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5 % in 1982 to 96.4 % in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39 %. This is impressive percentage, considering that China is worlds most populous country, and poverty dropping from 88% to 6% and having over 90% literacy. Even our average life expectancy (comparable to India in the past) has doubled according to the following source. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India: 1950-2100 china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm But look at poverty in India, and India's life expectancy. Even India's literacy is only 72.1%, so why not focus on fixing your own country's problems, instead of "worrying" about Pakistan?
    4
  6838. Besides poverty and illiteracy, India also has high hunger levels, driven by a high child malnutrition value. India ranked 100th out of 119 countries on the Global Hunger Index 2017, with a value of 31.4 (Serious). China on the other hand, is ranked 29th out of 119, with a GHI of 7.5 (Low). Source: India 100th on global hunger index thehindu.com/news/national/india-100th-on-global-hunger-index-trails-north-korea-bangladesh/article19846437.ece
    4
  6839.  @truenorthstrongandfree3699  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 which country would disrespect their founding father? Chairman Mao succeeded in reunifying our divided country where the previous Kuomintang administration failed under Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. The sexual practices you described are part of Taoism, which is part of Chinese culture. Scientific studies have shown that healthy sexual activities often resulted in a marked improvement of people's health, so there is some possible truth to the connection between sexual activity and vitality.
    4
  6840. Then why is mainland China the most visited Asian country in the world? According to World Tourism Rankings as of 2015, China is the 4th most visited country in the world, after France, United States, and Spain, with 56.9 million international tourists per year, and China is most visited Asian country in the world, surpassing even Japan, Korea, India, Thailand, etc.
    4
  6841. Whats wrong with building artificial islands. Many countries also built artificial islands of their own, so why can't China do the same?
    4
  6842. Taiwan was ruled by authoritarian single-party KMT for nearly its entire life. Only in 2016 (3 years ago) did another political party (DPP) finally took over KMT as Taiwan's goverment. Furthermore, before CCP took over China, China was under KMT adminstration from 1911 to 1949, and during that time, no elections were held, and China wasn't considered democratic under KMT rule.
    4
  6843. The Olympics should be about boosting international cooperation, not about politics like with that Belarusian athlete issue in Japan.
    4
  6844.  @PossibleTango  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, back when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China, and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during the Qing Dynasty. Just look up maps of Yuan and Qing Dynasty and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. So why should China give up our ancestral land of Tibet? Because Westerners say so?
    4
  6845.  @fake-news  Why do people care what house Meng Wanzhou live in? She's restricted from performing her job as Huawei's CFO, because the USA wants to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride that's all.
    4
  6846.  Rudolf Adler te envita  Studies have shown that Asians are among the most intelligent and diligent people, with long histories and rich cultures. People often stereotype Asians as hardworking, smart, good at math, good at science, good with money and having a good head for business. Stereotypical Asian jobs in the past have an element of hard work to them, such as railroad construction workers, rickshaw drivers, laborers (coolies), chefs (of Chinese restaurants) dry cleaners, laundromat workers, massage parlours and nail salons. If they save up money to send their kids to school, then their kids often studied hard, and not fool around in school, graduating to take on stereotypical Asian jobs like doctors, dentists, lawyers, engineers, programmers, bankers, scientists, businessmen, etc. Of course this is all merely stereotypes people have about Asians and not all of us follow the above stereotypes. But it must have happened enough times for people to form such stereotypes about Asians. We are often considered to be the "model minority" that is, possessing positive traits such as being seen as industrious, politically inactive, studious, intelligent, productive, and inoffensive people who have elevated their socioeconomic standing through merit, self-discipline and diligence. But of course in reality every race has their own strengths and weaknesses.
    4
  6847.  @patrickchoi7257  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    4
  6848. Time is of the irrelevance when it comes to China's hypersonic missiles. With just a simple button, China can launch a missile that can travel at many times the speed of sound, hardly interceptable by current anti-missile technology. Just when USA though that THAAD system can protect itself, China develops are missile that can strike anywhere on Earth within an hour. Would USA even be able to detect the missile launch, let alone scramble to intercept the missile? How can you stop something that can hit anywhere on Earth within an hour?
    4
  6849. China also has the world's longest range ballistic missile, the DF-41 that has an operational range between 12,000-15,000 km, surpassing the range of the US LGM-30 Minuteman which has a reported range of 13,000 km. It is believed to have a top speed of Mach 25, and to be capable of multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle (MIRV) delivery, allowing it to strike multiple different targets upon reentry. Video:China's DF-41 ICBM The World’s Longest range Nuclear Missile youtube.com/watch?v=6NzwzpMyuAc
    4
  6850.  @AndrewManook  I agree, a socialist country doesn't necessarily mean that the nation is poor.
    4
  6851.  @pelangi6628  Look at Islam and why does Islam have such a bad reputation outside of Islamic countries? There are so many religions in the world, like Taoism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Christianity, but the one religion most of the world associates with extremism is Islam. Why does Islam have this bad reputation? No one is being "racist" (Islam isn't even a race) here and it is Islam that created such bad reputation. China is trying to solve the problem of terrorism in China, by reeducating potentially extremist Uighurs and training them in job skills so that they graduate to become productive members of society, instead of wasting their lives becoming terrorists by migrating to the Middle East and joining the terrorists.
    4
  6852.  @rangzera3162  The West is bending over backwards to accommodate Islam. Muslim refugees are fleeing their own conflict-ridden Islamic countries, and then flooding the Western countries like United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, etc, and the Muslims are under little pressure to change their ways and adapt to their predominantly Christian host countries, much to the chagrin of local Westerners. Instead of assimilating into Western countries, Muslims continue their traditions like men marrying multiple wives, or women wearing Muslim headveil out in public, and secretly, many Westerners are angry at this, but they can't voice their honest opinions, for fear of being labelled as "racists" (even though Islam is not a race) or "Islamophobe" because of the "politically correctness" culture that is overtaking the West. Therefore, the Muslims take Westerner's silence as acceptance of their traditions.
    4
  6853.  @yvoferdinandvanderhoek1027  Ever since China started this program, there have been no more terrorist attacks in Xinjiang ever since. Before that, Xinjiang had numerous terrorist attacks perpetrated by misguided Uighurs who have been influenced by radical Islam, so China is reforming their ways, educating them and training them in job skills necessary to prepare them for the workforce. So that they graduate to become productive members of society, rather than sacrifice their lives for terrorist's causes.
    4
  6854. According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is impressive feat, considering that China is world's most populous country and managed to achieve 6.5% poverty and 96.4% literacy. If people want to dismiss this as communist propaganda, then go look up the World Bank and UNESCO assessment of China's poverty and literacy rate. Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China
    4
  6855.  @leonguererro-n8s  "The Spaniards came followed by the Americans and the Japanese." It's astonishing that Philippines had been historically colonized by the Americans, after losing a war in which some 250,000 Filipino citizens were killed. Yet China, now is being pictured as an invader, even though China has no history of invading the Philippines.
    4
  6856. Capitalism is killing the planet, it's the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."
    4
  6857. Did Putin ever said that no one can save Ukraine? When did he said that?
    4
  6858. 姓“萨德”的傻逼来了。
    4
  6859. +Sam Shyam Mao Zedong was fed false reports of bountiful harvest and exaggerated growth figures from other communist members (who wanted to please him and report good news) and that led to ignorance and starvation. Furthermore, China suffered the Great Chinese Famine, which resulted in bad weather, flooding and drought causing destruction of crops and starvation. It should be noted too, that those people died from starvation too. If those Chinese warlords unified China, then who was their leader if not Mao Zedong? Why did Jiang Jieshi (of the Kuomintang) lost control of the mainland to poorly equipped, poorly trained, heavily outnumbered communists peasants? The KMT had wealth (they taxed the lands heavily) had better equipment, better training, better numbers, yet the KMT lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Taiwan. This demonstrates great incompetence on KMT's right to rule the mainland. Tibet was part of China during Qing dynasty, and even the KMT wanted to eventually reclaim Tibet as part of China. How do you know whether most Tibetans hate Mao? Under the Tibetan rulers (14th Dalai Lama) Tibet was backward, brutal theocracy, with 95% of the population being slaves and the other 5% slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil was infertile, and many slaves had to struggle to feed the population of Tibet. Starvation and crime were commonplace, punishments were cruel and included torture, amputation and skinning. There is this Tibetan drum called damaru that is made from two human skulls, a drumskin made from human skin and a drumstick made from human bone. When Mao Zedong took over Tibet in 1951, Tibet began modernization. Under CCP rule, infrastructure was built in Tibet, like roads, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity. Modern technology like cars, smartphones, computers, Internet, WiFi, telecommunications were introduced to Tibet. The Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest altitude railway) was built through difficult mountaineous terrain and low oxygen conditions to connect the otherwise isolated Tibet to the rest of the world. Food can now be imported from the mainland to feed Tibet. Hydroelectric powerstations were built in Tibet to supply clean renewable energy. The first Tibetan universities opened offering courses in Mandarin Chinese and Tibetan languages. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region From the above, I would say life in Tibet under the CCP today is probably much better than life under the Tibetan leaders.
    4
  6860.  @stadinh  "America is only major developed society where the average income of the bottom 50% has gone down over a 30-year period." — Kishore Mabubani, former UNSC President.
    4
  6861.  @foobman  "they could save their cultural identity." What makes you think Uighur cultural identity is under threat? The Uighurs in Xinjiang can be seen wearing their traditional Uighur clothing (i.e the chapan and the doppa) eating Uighur cusine (i.e naan flatbread and mutton kebabs), singing and dancing (i.e Uighur Muqam, registered as UNESCO intangible cultural heritage) and playing traditional Uighur instruments (i.e Uighur Dutar). Also, the Uighur script is written all over the road signs, shop signs, restaurant menus and so on in Xinijang. I mean, have you actually been to Xinjiang and seen what life is like there for yourself?
    4
  6862.  @abreathoffreshair1  You said: "The CCP has never ruled that island, so there is no sovereignty issue." If that's the case, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the UN? Is there some force that's preventing Taiwan from joining the United Nations like an independent country can? You said: ""Peaceful integration" is an impossibility." It would be possible, only if the U.S doesn't interfere in cross strait relations, by sending the U.S House of Speakers representative to visit the island.
    4
  6863. This radio telescope is also known in China as Tianyan 天眼 "Eye of the Heavens" by President Xi Jinping.
    4
  6864. +Bolly Movies The radio telescope is long-term project and much preparation needs to be done to ready it for active service. Such huge device requires multiple calibrations for accuracy and will probably be ready after some time. This is no surprising for world's largest telescope, and in the meantime astronomers can be trained to handle it once it is ready. After all, even if there is qualified and available scientist today, he or she won't be able to start work, until the telescope is fully calibrated to specifications. Hence, there is no real need to hire a qualified scientist immediately. As for our "ghost towns" they are slowly being filled as China's rural population continues to filter in sporadically. There are still many poor people in countryside, and time is needed to get them to adapt to life in the cities. For example, Zhengzhou 郑州 was "ghost city" in 2010, but it is slowly being filled by rural Chinese finding work in the cities. Source: https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2012/06/china-ghost-cities-being-filled.html All of the above are China's long term projects. Of course you don't see any benefits in short term. You need to look further into 2020s, 2030s, 2050s to really see the benefits.
    4
  6865.  @Andy-P  That Hong Kong protestor hung an insulting picture of Chinese President Xi Jinping at the consulate entrance, which would be intolerable and unacceptable for any diplomatic and consular missions of any country. The Chinese consular condemn this deplorable act with strong indignation and firm opposition. The allegations of violence should be looked into, but until actual evidence emerges, the Chinese consular should be considered innocent until proven guilty, as per U.K law.
    4
  6866.  @Andy-P  Earlier in Jan 2022, in the same UK city of Manchester, a Chinese woman (surname Wang) was similarly attacked by Hong Kong separatists, who gathered in Manchester at about 4:00 pm in front of her shop. She came out and debated with them after hearing them using the word "Shina,'' a derogatory term referring to China. "You can have your opinions, but I won't allow you to separate my country," Wang said in a video circulating on Chinese social media platforms. In the video, one of the separatists - wearing black like rioters in the 2019 violent protests in Hong Kong - suddenly attacked Wang with an umbrella. The Chinese Embassy in the UK condemned the "despicable action" of "Hong Kong independence rioters" for threatening and attacking a Chinese citizen in Manchester and urged British authorities to bring the perpetrators to justice. But the British police let the suspects go.
    4
  6867.  @propertysolutions4773  Sri Lanka's debt to China will mature in 18 years, compared to 33 years for Sri Lanka's debt to Japan, so Japan actually stands to earn more interest since it is being charged longer.
    4
  6868.  @propertysolutions4773  You said: " your statement is still false & not true" How is my statement false? Sri Lanka's debt to China will mature in 18 years, compared to 33 years for Sri Lanka's debt to Japan.
    4
  6869.  @joshlewis575  "神州 Shenzhou no because u can search this goofball up n see he is paid by the ccp to parrot their nonsense." I watched Cyrus' previous videos and his message has always been about "Building Bridges, Not Walls" and promoting peaceful cooperation between China and the USA. If you're claiming Cyrus is parroting the Communist Party's message, then you're saying Cyrus' positive message is the same as the CPC's? Then isn't that a good thing for the world to have more bridges and less walls?
    4
  6870. Come to think of it, much of Taiwan's economy growth from 1950-1980 was accomplished under the authoritarian single-party KMT rule. Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    4
  6871. China produced many successful Chinese companies like Huawei, Lenovo, ZTE, Xiaomi, Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, Haier, JD, DJI, ICBC, China Construction Bank, China Agricultural Bank, Bank of China, State Grid Corporation of China, China State Construction Engineering, China Minmetals, Ping An Insurance, China Shenhua Energy, Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, and this list is not exhaustive. Sources: List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks Fortune Global 500 wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_Global_500 Forbes Global 2000 wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Global_2000 But maybe one day Chinese companies will be as famous as famous Indian companies!
    4
  6872. K S It is a known fact that when you work, you will have less time to spend on your family isn't it? That's the primary reason why working dads are generally less familiar with the kids, and if mom is working as well, that will inevitably contribute to less interaction with kids. Why accuse me of being on drugs for this logic here? Many factors contribute to social problems, crime and poverty, and you can't just pin those things directly on empowerment of women alone.
    4
  6873. It's the fault of Capitalism that the rich developed countries can buy up and hoard the vaccines, leaving little to none for the poor developing countries. Communism is the belief that scarce resources should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs (German: Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen)" Had we been living in a truly communist world, the vaccines would be distributed according to needs, meaning that the poorer developing countries have priority in access to much needed vaccines.
    4
  6874.  @golazo  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    4
  6875.  @sophienben-achour5450  "神州 Shenzhou if that was covid then it would have spread to the population but it didn't." How would you know that it didn't? Even the CDC director Robert Redfield has publicly admitted that some Covid-19 deaths have been misdiagnosed as flu in the USA. Source: CDC director: Some COVID-19 deaths misdiagnosed as influenza in the U.S. news.cgtn.com/news/2020-03-12/CDC-director-Some-COVID-19-deaths-misdiagnosed-as-influenza-in-U-S--ONz0SToSoE/index.html Robert Redfield, the director for the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) openly admitted on Wednesday that some COVID-19 deaths have been misdiagnosed as influenza in the U.S.
    4
  6876.  @golazo  Video: U.S. mayor claims he contracted COVID-19 in November youtu.be/Ht9hlc5MbEM The mayor of Belleville, New Jersey, Michael Melham said he tested positive for coronavirus antibodies, adding that he contracted the novel coronavirus in November, over two months before the first confirmed case was reported in the U.S.
    4
  6877.  @maicholaa7482  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    4
  6878.  paul w  China is evil? China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    4
  6879.  @MarkYeung1  "The Hong Kong National Security Laws weren't passed until June 30th 2020, 1.5 years after the beginning of the protests." Mainland China allowed the Hong Kong protests to continue for more than a year before finally passing the Hong Kong National Security Law. Which authoritarian government would permit protests within its territory lasting for more than one year before finally taking action? And thanks to the National Security Law, peace has finally returned to Hong Kong after a year of turmoil.
    4
  6880.  @MarkYeung1  "Hong Kong was rocked by violent protest during the summer which could easily be avoided, should the government listened to the people." But the Hong Kong government listened to the people and scrapped the extradition bill, yet the Hong Kong riots continued long after the bill was scrapped. This shows that even if the government listened to the people, the Hong Kong riots would still continue regardless.
    4
  6881.  Anthony Payne   serpentza and c-milk aren't even living in China, I used to watch their earlier videos about China which showed both the positive and negative aspects of China. However, over the years they changed, and their latest videos about China have been largely negative (even after they left China)
    4
  6882.  @aviyahcrow6617  Ukraine was once the center of world attention, until Oct 7 happened and now Ukraine has been largely abandoned by the media. Hopefully the people of Taiwan learn from Ukraine's mistakes and not to follow in its footsteps.
    4
  6883. 我们要继续努力为中国创造更美好的未来。🇨🇳 We must continue our efforts to build a better future for China. 🇨🇳
    4
  6884.  @Andy-P  According to a BBC article: Unemployed young people make up just 1.4% of the potential workforce in China's urban areas, Dan Wang, chief economist at Hang Seng Bank China has estimated.
    4
  6885.  @MarkYeung1  So you're saying Russia is doing well? Great.
    4
  6886.  @MarkYeung1  Certainly not. But Ukraine certainly is.
    4
  6887. @Ben Benito Go and read the 2010 Forbes article: Why Google Is Quitting China? and it lists how even though Google's market share climbed from 15% (mid-2006) to 31% (2010), Baidu's share went from 47% (mid-2006) to 64% (2010), which is a big lead. Baidu also introduced several innovative search features customized for local tastes that Google didn't, and that's why Google decided to leave China. -Baidu was first to the market with mobile search and information offered up in multimedia, including video clips. -Baidu also set up a national network of advertising resellers in 200 Chinese cities to educate businesses about the power of online advertising--a step that Google did not take. -One other key factor put Baidu in the lead: Its search technology was considered superior to Google's in the Mandarin language. ... (all of this is taken off the Forbes article)
    4
  6888. Mohit Negi China also has anti-ship ballistic missile, DF-21d, nicknamed 'Carrier Killer', that is capable of attaining speeds of Mach 10 (or 10 times the speed of sound) whereas Brahmo's maximum speed is only Mach 2.8 to Mach 3, so how is Brahmos the fastest missile in the world? Video:China Carrier Killer : DF-21D The Fastest Missile in the World youtube.com/watch?v=M_GHE2DjsqQ
    4
  6889. As Chinese myself, I personally found many Hollywood movies to be severely lacking in Asian actors. Asian actors (Chinese,Japanese, Koreans) are simply underrepresented in Hollywood, often cast into cliche roles like martial artist, triad thug, nerdy but social inept guy, hacker, etc. Asian actresses often get roles as damsel in distress (to be saved by Caucasian male lead) or prostitutes, dragon ladies, massage parlor workers, other sexualized roles etc. Also, there's also "white-washing" of Asian characters, that is, the casting of Caucasian actor/actress to portray a character of Asian descent on film. Hopefully, China's influence on Hollywood can grant more prominent roles to Asian actors/actresses.
    4
  6890. Many Filipinos tend to have the "colonial mentality". Such people view their own culture, langauge and values as "backward" and try to adhere to the language, culture and values of their colonial masters. Even after being granted independence, the minds of the people remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. It's like Stockholm Syndrome.
    4
  6891.  @FirstNameLastName-vw7ol  How did the government spread it across the world? The government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and halt production, closing tourist attractions, imposing lockdown on Wuhan, banning mass gatherings, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and contain the virus. Now it's finally paying off that the virus is under control in China and we are cautiously reopening our economy. But in Western countries like US and UK, their economies are far too precious to sacrifice so human health has to be sacrificed instead. Donald Trump wants to reopen the economy by Easter and Boris Johnson is relying on "herd immunity" to the pull through. So human lives have to be sacrificed instead of the economy.
    4
  6892. Xi in mandarin sounds closer to the letter "C"
    4
  6893.  @luciferlam6556  Korea was once a unified country, but Japanese invade it and after Japanese surrender, Korea was (needlessly) divided into North Korea (USSR) and South Korea (USA). Why was this division of Korea even necessary in the first place? Wasn't USA one of the culprits who divided a once unified Korea? North Korea wanted to end this humiliating division of its home country and it almost succeeded (99% unified). But then the United States suddenly declared war on North Korea and invaded Korea to push them back, even though this is internal civil war within Korea. They pushed the North Koreans right up to China's doorstep (the Liaoning Province) and thus, China reluctantly joined in Korean war to push the invaders back to the 38 Parallel (line of division between North and South Korea)
    4
  6894.  @luciferlam6556  Why United States and Europe believe in democracy? Why involve ordinary citizens in political decisions regarding the country's future? Ordinary citizens may not know how to vote responsibly (they refuse to turn up to vote, or they submit blank votes) or they may make decisions base on emotions (I don't like foreigners, so I want Britain to exit the EU) or they may simply lack the political awareness of their country's situation. Worst, democracy is susceptible to foreign influence (like allegations of Russian Hacking in US elections) I mean, why not let those people who know how to govern, govern? Why involve ordinary citizen's votes in your country's politics?
    4
  6895. Carl Zha is a walking encyclopedia of Chinese history.
    4
  6896. @Republic of china,the real china,communist fake Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for over 30 years already?
    4
  6897.  @myspace1876  About China's "president for life", China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US short term leadership.
    4
  6898.  @myspace1876  Under 100 years of communist party rule, China has since transformed from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy today, the world's factory (Made-In-China), having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    4
  6899.  @myspace1876  German Chancellor Angela Merkel has been in power for 16 years far longer than President Xi Jinping been in power for 8 years, literally half the time that Chancellor Merkel been in power. Yet nobody is complaining about her being in power, in fact, some people rather Merkel be in power even longer.
    4
  6900.  @chadleach6009  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the USA is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    4
  6901. 我觉得西方媒体继续给他们的民众洗脑挺好让他们知道中国和中国人民都不咋滴，我们继续低调的发展。西方对中国的理解程度绝对比不上我们对西方的了解程度。
    4
  6902.  @ernahubbard2062  China actually invited Mike Pompeo to visit Xinjiang and see for himself that there are no human rights violations in Xinjiang. But Pompeo declined China's invitation to visit Xinjiang. Source: China Invites Pompeo to Visit Xinjiang, Says There Are No Rights Abuses newsweek.com/china-invites-mike-pompeo-visit-xinjiang-no-rights-abuses-1518294
    4
  6903.  @Tespri  China has suffered many civil wars and invasion, broken apart many times throughout the span of its history, yet through it all, China has always reformed with a new dynasty and assimilated/expelled the foreign intruders eventually. The Mongols conquered Song Dynasty China, but the Mongolian leader Kublai Khan choose to abandon his Mongolian culture and adopt Han Chinese culture. His grandfather, Genghis Khan, was a true Mongol nomad, and purportedly never slept under a permanent roof his entire life. However, Kublai Khan choose to break with tradition, and proclaimed himself Emperor of Yuan Dynasty and resided in the Imperial Palace (i.e under permanent roof). So if anything, the Mongolian rulers of China had been assimilated into Han culture.
    4
  6904.  @Tespri  What makes you seem to think whatever remnants of Chinese culture is destroyed? China has many historical monuments still around today. Haven't you heard of the Great Wall of China? The Forbidden City? The Tomb of the Qin Emperor (First Emperor of China)? The Grand Canal (world's oldest artificial river)? Yet you're claiming that whatever remnants of Chinese culture is destroyed?
    4
  6905.  @Tespri  So if historical buildings aren't part of culture, then what is? Chinese today still celebrate traditional Chinese festivals from long ago, such as Chinese New Year (Spring Festival), Lantern Festival, Qingming (Grave-sweeping) Festival, Dragon Boat Festival, Double Seventh (Chinese's Valentines Day), Mid-Autumn Festival and so on. Did you know that the Spring Festival migration has been termed the world's largest annual human migration, bigger than even the Christmas migration? Yet you're claiming that whatever remnants of Chinese culture is destroyed?
    4
  6906. Not to be overly boastful but many studies have shown that Asians are among the most intelligent and diligent peoples on Earth, with long history and rich cultures of our own. Why then should we rely on the West to solve our own problems? Long ago, Korea was once unified country, but has been divided into North Korea (by Soviet Union) and South Korea (by United States) so why continue to rely on the West?
    4
  6907.  @willengel2458  Agreed with your point. The U.S is unable to win Vietnam War, Korean War, or even the 20-year long Afghan War against a bunch of insurgents? Instead of achieving victory, the U.S dragged its allies into conflict after conflict, and yet the U.S allies still seem eager to become cannon fodder. Even in Ukraine, the West is determined to fight Russia down to the last Ukrainian.
    4
  6908.  @HannarrMontannarr  This is what you wrote earlier: "Lets not forge that china attack UN forces in korea, an organisation that it was a member of," But People's Republic of China was NOT yet a UN member during the Korean War, so why are you claiming China attack UN forces in Korea, an organisation that it was a member of? You've already gotten your history chronically mixed up, since the Korean War was in 1950 – 1953, whereas PRC became UN member in 1970s (approx. 20 years later). Why was Korea even divided up in the first place? Korea was once a single unified country but was conquered by Japan and after Japanese WWII surrender, Korea was divided into North Korea (Soviet Union) and South Korea (United States). North Korea wanted to end this humiliating division of their country and it almost succeeded (99% unified Korea) but then the United States suddenly declared war against North Korea and joined in this internal Korean civil war between North and South Korea. The UN forces did not stop at the North Korean-South Korean border (38 Paralle) they actually pushed past the 38 Parallel and invaded actual North Korean territory themselves, right up to the doorstep of China (Liaoning Province) Reluctantly, PRC was forced to take defensive measures and later joined the war against United States, pushing UN forces back to the 38 Parallel. And as far as I know, Chinese troops did NOT cross the 38 Parallel during Korean War and ventured into South Korean territory, whereas UN forces crossed the 38 Parallel into North Korean territory, so isn't UN forces the one at fault here by pushing past the border in to North Korean territory? And like I said earlier, PRC was not yet a member of UN during the time of Korean War.
    4
  6909. Here's a Chinese analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family, which in turn open up a path to her ex-husband's doorstep. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    4
  6910.  @hermittmog8697  Huawei CFO (also the CEO's daughter) Meng Wanzhou have been arrested by Canadian authorities, even though Meng did not break any Canadian laws while in Canada. She was arrested in 2018, yet up till now there's no hearing for her? Is it because there's no evidence of Meng having broken any Canadian laws?
    4
  6911. China during this period already had advanced technological developments like the crossbow (Chinese invention) and therefore the balistae as well as other siege engines like traction trebuchet were also present in China during this period.
    4
  6912.  @jasonleetaiwan  "Even Mao knew he was actually a joke internally crying in his room when CKS passed away I'm 1975." A joke? Chairman Mao had succeed in what even Chiang kai-shek failed to achieve, that is the reunification of China, putting an end to the senseless bloodshed, the unnecessary loss of life, and the expulsion of foreign imperialism from our lands. Finally after a century of humiliation, China was no longer bullied by outsiders, and we can start picking up the pieces of our shattered country. Mao Zedong cried at the passing of Chiang kai-shek, because they shared similar views. Both Chiang and Mao agreed that Taiwan is part of China and wanted eventual reunification with the homeland.
    4
  6913.  @night6724  "if you love Chinese culture then oppose the CCP and RoC and support the Qing" That's kinda like saying "If you love American culture then support African slavery" to that effect.
    4
  6914.  @fantared5263  So I take it that you're also against U.S warships sailing to within 12 Nautical Miles of the Paracel Islands in Chinese territorial waters right? And so far there hasn't been any Chinese warships spotted in the Solomon Islands, nor are there any Chinese troops stationed there.
    4
  6915.  @BrokeCanadian  Capitalism is killing the planet, it's the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."
    4
  6916.  @NoChinaforever17  Japan invaded Korea and occupied your country for 35 years, go ask the Korean "comfort women" whether they like the Japanese or not.
    4
  6917.  @ronburgandy1475  Exactly, France had the same situation according to The Times: France fights terror with camps for re-education thetimes.co.uk/article/france-fights-terror-with-re-education-camps-plan-7wg9vrrgd (Taken from the above source) France will send radicalised Islamists to re-education centres under a €40 million plan to tackle extremism, which the prime minister says is the biggest threat to the nation since Hitler. The suspects will be taught their patriotic duties and forced to undergo psychological treatment in an attempt to counter jihadist indoctrination.
    4
  6918.  @gravydave1771  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, back when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during the Qing Dynasty. Just look up maps of Yuan and Qing Dynasty and Tibet is clearly part of Chinese history. Likewise for Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang, it was the Mongols who made it part of Yuan Dynasty as well as the Manchus during Qing Dynasty.
    4
  6919.  @julion89  Generally, most Chinese tend to be humble and polite, or simply lack English proficiency in order to debate properly. I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, hoping to bridge the understanding between East and West. But being abroad, I was appalled how many Westerners tend to view China in a negative light, as that is how China is often portrayed in their media. Some Westerners that I've engaged with laugh at me whenever I mention China's achievements, and a few of them (not all) even told me to "Go back to China if you like it there," even when I suspect they themselves have never actually set foot in China and seen what life is like.
    4
  6920.  @mayurk8697  If you want to talk about prisons, it's actually the United States that's home to the largest prison population in the world, and if you want to talk about free labor inside the prison, the prisoners in USA are literally paid peanuts for their work.
    4
  6921. The Chinese government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and halt production, closing tourist attractions, imposing lockdown, banning mass gatherings, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and contain the virus. Now it's finally paying off that the virus is under control in China and we are cautiously reopening our economy. But in Western countries like US and UK, their economies are far too precious to sacrifice so human health has to be sacrificed instead. Donald Trump wants to reopen the economy by Easter and Boris Johnson is relying on "herd immunity" to the pull through. So human lives have to be sacrificed instead of the economy.
    4
  6922.  @laserraiset3300  "神州 Shenzhou you cried about dollar was printed, but defend trillions of printed yuans each year" I've already explained multiple times. China is subject to specific rules whenever the government decides to print money, be it considerations of gold reserves, economic growth, etc, whereas U.S can just continue printing dollar with impunity.
    4
  6923.  @chriswong9158  "The differ is China's Yuan is back by Golden vs USA by IOU aka Treasury Bond (paper) fact check" Exactly. This is precisely the kind of explanation I was trying to make.
    4
  6924.  @stunningandbrave2520  You said: "14 months after the war started." Better late than never. But the U.S has stated that it opposes the 12 point peace process put forth by China, and the West hasn't even talked to Putin, whereas President Xi has talked to both Zelenskyy and Putin. So if anything, China is the best bet towards a peaceful resolution to the conflict in Ukraine. You said: "And it is inconceivable that Xi did not agree to Putin's invasion. They met at the winter Olympics just before it happened. Xi knew and was therefore complicit." Do you have any actual proof of your claims? If not, then this is merely speculation on your part.
    4
  6925.  @after1001  "All the smart young talent from China have moved to San Francisco." With such high student populations, competition for top schools and higher education in China is fierce and intense. Some students don't qualify for local university in China, so they study abroad and flood your top Western universities with Chinese international students. They compete with your local students in exams, for university places, and even for job offers when they graduate. Don't believe? Just ask your local university students how they feel about the Chinese competition. And if they can't find a job in your country, then they are always welcome to come back to China (thus saving China the expenses needed to train this student to university level) and they are also bringing foreign technology and knowledge to China. A sort of "reverse brain drain" Any way you look at it, China wins.
    4
  6926.  @rv8804  It's because while Britain was colonial superpower in 19th century (eventually overtaken by USA in 20th century) China had been economic superpower for 1800 years prior to Britain. But during the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want what the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars on China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them, which we didn't want, because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Port Cities like Shanghai were forced to act as drug distribution hubs, and Hong Kong was taken and made into British Colony. Even when British renounced ownership over its former colonies, Hong Kong was not fully returned to China. So much crap happened to China after that, from the civil war between KMT and CCP, to Japanese invasion, to Korean War, to Mao's era, etc, etc. Now China is more or less stabilized, and growing, more poor people having access to education, According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 6.5% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Wikipedia: Poverty in China And believe it or not, its all achieved under CCP leadership. China has woken up and is rapidly catching up to Western world. India as the world's 2nd most populous country, also enjoys the same statistical geniuses. That's why you'll see many international students from China and India studying math, sciences, or computing, business, etc, within your Western universities.
    4
  6927.  @rv8804  You sorely mistaken (and arrogant) if you think with Western education comes the ability to think for yourselves. The Hong Kong protests were mostly by naive and idealistic HK undergraduates, who've been brought up in a cloistered environment of education, studying textbook ideals and perfect theories. These HK undergraduates have not even step outside into real working world, get a job, get married, get an apartment and settle down. Yet they already think they know how to govern HK already? Look at rest of the people in the real world and they continued working as usual, schoolkids go to school, office workers go to work and so on. These are the people who have jobs to do and families to feed, and they aren't protesting, in fact they grumble about the students obstructing the roads.
    4
  6928. @bd z When China market fall? That's what Westerns been saying all along! 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. But it's already 2019, and China's market is still going strong, yet you continue to believe that Western anti-China propaganda, when it has been consistently proven wrong for almost 30 years already?
    4
  6929. I've always thought of that phrase as Watson's retort to Sherlock. Sherlock: "Elementary, my dear Watson." Watson: "No s**t, Sherlock!"
    4
  6930.  @johnnydimauro9765  There's also a possibility that the virus originated in USA. Source: COVID-19: Further Evidence that the Virus Originated in the US globalresearch.ca/covid-19-further-evidence-virus-originated-us/5706078
    4
  6931.  @Andy-P  You said: "Taiwanese has their own culture and passports." Could you explain how Taiwanese culture different? They still use Chinese characters and speak Mandarin. As for passports, Hong Kong has their own passport but is still part of China. Same goes for Taiwan.
    4
  6932.  @Andy-P  "Shenzhou. Just because they speak the language doesn't mean culture is the same." Then (as I asked earlier) could you explain how Taiwanese culture is different? Does Taiwan also celebrate the Chinese New Year? Or Mid-Autumn Festival? Lantern Festival? I mean you're the one claiming that Taiwanese culture is different, but you failed to explain how exactly is it different. You said: "Is American culture exactly the same as British." What has that even got to do with Taiwanese culture and mainland Chinese culture? Instead of throwing a red herring, why don't you explain how is Taiwanese culture different from mainland China?
    4
  6933.  @Andy-P  They don't have to! That's the beauty of the 1 Country, 2 Systems principle. China is open to the concept of different governing systems existing within its borders. That's why under this system, Hong Kong can keep their government, their elections, their passports, their currency, etc, as long as at the end of the day, Hong Kong remains part of China. That's why it's called 1 Country, 2 Systems. President Xi has even offered to extend the 1 Country, 2 Systems to include Taiwan allowing them to keep their government, passport, etc, but be considered as having fully reunified with China. As far as I know, no other country has such a system like this. (It would be something like North Korea and South Korea agreeing to reunify as a single country, Korea, while allowing both sides to keep their respective governments.)
    4
  6934.  @Andy-P  Taiwan's economy flourished under authoritarian single-party KMT rule. From 1952 to 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and 6.9% from 1983 1986. Taiwan's GDP grew by 360% between 1965 and 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 and 1986. The social gap between the rich and the poor fell (Gini: 0.558 in 1953, 0.303 in 1980), even lower than some Western European countries! That's why this period given the name, the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). But Taiwan's economic growth became more modest in 1990s after democracy was introduced to the island. Today, Taiwan's economy is stagnant, wages are stagnant, the cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising, and many Taiwan graduates are seeking job opportunities abroad, in mainland China or in places like Singapore.
    4
  6935.  @Andy-P  China's economy grew 5.2% on the year in 2023, slightly more than the official target, according to the National Bureau of Statistics. And you're saying Taiwan can match mainland China? The mainland has produced many successful Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Vivo, Oppo, DJI, Alibaba, Tencent. But where are the famous companies in Taiwan as compared to mainland China?
    4
  6936.  @Andy-P  India is world's largest democratic country, with a similar population size to China's, yet why isn't India on par with China, despite India being a democracy? Why is it people continue to think the a country has to be democratic to be successful, and they are unable to tolerate alternative forms of governance that may prove better? Even if average Taiwanese have more income than average mainland Chinese, the cost of living in mainland China is (generally) lower than that of Taiwan. Food is cheap in mainland China. Rent is affordable. Electricity is cheaper. Transportation is affordable, given China's extensive railway infrastructure, as well as the predominance of rental bikes across Chinese cities.
    4
  6937.  @Andy-P  Chinese view high speed rail not in terms of whether it makes a profit or not, but whether it serves the needs of the people. For example, even though the Lanzhou-Xinjiang high-speed rail is making a loss, but the train tickets are affordable for people traveling to Xinjiang and this encourages investment in Xinjiang to develop the region.
    4
  6938.  @nickiseb8910  Who said Mao oppressed Tibetans? The Communist Party developed Tibet Autonomous Region, building roads, railways, highways, streetlamps, electricity, running water, gas pipelines, and so on. Have you actually been to TAR and seen what life is like there for yourself?
    4
  6939.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "If Russia agrees to the plan, all troops would be out of Ukraine now." That means that NATO should withdraw their troops from Ukraine as well as stop sending military aid, if they truly wanted peace in Ukraine, yet why is NATO not doing so? Don't you agree that the West sending military aid to Ukraine is only prolonging the war?
    4
  6940.  @bartonlee3594  This Item69 guy doesn't seem interested in a peaceful resolution for Ukraine. His/Her sarcastic response to President Xi's phonecall with Zelenskyy is "After more than a year of war. Wow. What a peacemaker lol", then does he support war?
    4
  6941. The communist party had smaller numbers than the KMT, so the communists resorted to tactics suitable for a smaller force to oppose a bigger force, like guerilla warfare for example. You don't just charge your smaller force directly into the fray and get them all obliterated.
    4
  6942. Chinese Confucian culture values the elderly folk of society, even if it comes at the expense of the economy. Loss of income is tragic yes, but money loss can be eventually earned again in the future. But once elderly people lose their lives, no amount of money can buy back those lives that have been lost.
    4
  6943.  @MarkYeung1  New Zealand's Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has announced a nationwide lockdown after the country confirmed 1 coronavirus case. It's literally at the same level of approach as China.
    4
  6944. Countries are already starting to make oil transactions in other currencies besides the Dollar, such as in Rubles, Rupees or Renminbi.
    4
  6945.  @rezakarampour6286  Indeed. Global de-dollarization is increasing.
    4
  6946.  @mcbeebee8292  Excellent post. It's a pity that your comment has been censored.
    4
  6947.  @宋庆-i4m  Anti-China sentiment is growing in the USA (especially during the Trump era) so it depends on which time period you visited the USA. Anti-Asian crimes are on the rise in the USA.
    4
  6948.  @宋庆-i4m  Sarcasm doesn't transmit well through text and can be difficult to detect when someone is being sarcastic or not through text. Because so many people readily believe negative things about China, but not the positive things. The thing is, the fact that these expats travelled to Xinjiang, already disproves the Western anti-China MSM claiming people can't visit Xinjiang. It helps dispel the myth that Uighurs are unhappy, or that there is cultural genocide, given that the roadsigns, streetsigns, restaurant menus have Uighur language written on them. Even the Renminbi bill has Uighur language written as one of the 5 languages on the banknote, if the government was truly promoting cultural genocide, then you won't be seeing the promotion of Uighur language and culture.
    4
  6949.  @宋庆-i4m  Because that's just the way American MSM operates. Can't a news media report bad things about their own country as true, yet at the same time, falsely report negative things about China as true? The thing is, many American MSM uses the negative portrayal of its own country as proof it's reliability. After gaining this trust from audiences, they promote a false narrative of China, painting China in a negative light and "demonising" our country, so much such that many Americans already hold a negative view of China. Even without setting foot in China and seeing what life is like here for themselves. That's just how insidious American MSM is, they use negative news about America to gain credibility, and use that credibility to promote lies about China. The media can always present double standards to make itself appear reliable. Honestly speaking, China's propaganda sucks. Many people just don't want to believe Chinese propaganda, even when presented with actual facts and statistics. That's why many foreigners already have a negative view of China before arriving here, because our propaganda sucks. However, American propaganda is very effective. Many people readily believe negative things about China as long as American media presents it, even without proof. And even after people spent time debunking American lies, people still continue to believing the fake news after it's been disproven. Just like when former President Bush invaded Iraq on suspicion of harbouring Weapons of Mass Destruction, however after invading Iraq, no WMDs were ever found. Yet many Americans still justify the Iraq War. This is testament to the efficacy of American propaganda, as compared to China's propaganda. That's why world views towards China and USA are in their current state.
    4
  6950.  @knowitall5913  "神州 Shenzhou you didn't answer his question." I read his comment and there was no question being asked (since there is no question mark) so what for do I have to answer question?
    4
  6951.  @intothewrx  Could you explain how China broke the Sino-British declaration? Hong Kong today currently has their own government separate from the mainland. Hong Kong has their own separate judiciary system. Hong Kong has their own separate passport (Hong Kong passport) as well as separate currency (Hong Kong dollars). The Hong Kong people vote in elections for their favourite leaders and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections. So how exactly did China break the Sino-British declaration?
    4
  6952.  @andrenogueira5058  Your words remind me of Mike Pompeo's famous line: "We lied! we cheated! we stole!"
    4
  6953.  Numinous Thought  In China's system, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit. Whereas in the USA, the U.S corporations control the U.S government for profit, waging wars in the Middle East to control the oil, for example. That's how we know China isn't as capitalist as the USA.
    4
  6954. "When you cut out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say." - George R. R. Martin.
    4
  6955.  @jimgraham6722  You said: "Democracy means the government of a country always reflects the needs of a clear majority of the country." If that's your definition of democracy then China fits this definition. China's government is able to deliver progress for a clear majority of our country, as witnessed through various poverty alleviation efforts and living standards in China are rising. How then does China not make the cut?
    4
  6956.  @jimgraham6722  A long-term study by Harvard University and Ash Center has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support their government. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. So doesn't China fit your definition of democracy when the government is able to reflect the needs of a clear majority of the country?
    4
  6957.  @MikeHacks  (a) Why not? Do you want unregistered people running around in your country? What if one of these unregistered persons turns out to be potential extremist and starts killing random people? I remember news about a Caucasian man gunning down 50 Muslims attending mosque in New Zealand (the gunman even live-streamed the whole thing on the Web) and where did he acquire his weapons? China is cracking down on the extremist elements of religion, and this includes those "underground churches" you mentioned. If they are properly registered by the authorities, then how is this a bad thing? (b) Despite what you are claiming, other sources have reported that Chinese Christian population is increasing and that China is on course to become world's most Christian country in 15 years. Source: China On Track To Become World’s Largest Christian Country By 2025, Experts Say huffpost.com/entry/china-largest-christian-country_n_5191910 China on course to become 'world's most Christian nation' within 15 years telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/10776023/China-on-course-to-become-worlds-most-Christian-nation-within-15-years.html If you want to remain "unregistered and hidden" in China, then please leave our country immediate, since you don't even want to respect Chinese laws while in China. Go to Christian country, or even Islamic country, and see how they treat Christians in Islamic country.
    4
  6958. You mean that mysterious "Uighur" interview on board the train, whose voice was purposed distorted? It could have been faked by VICE News in order to manufacture witnesses to paint China in a negative light.
    4
  6959. USA accuse China of potentially abusing the Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now scrapped). Yet USA is abusing their extradition bill with Canada through the Huawei CFO fiasco. The sheer irony of the USA, accusing China of doing what they are actually doing.
    4
  6960. S Kim Ng I agree. If Philippines is thinking about going to war with China, then who will supply Philippines with weapons? China? USA? USA blocked their sale of arms to Philippines because of the way Philippines President Duterte treat the drug lords. But China supplied arms to Philippines, and Philippines still can think of going to war with China?
    4
  6961. Agreed. It's no secret today that capitalism is killing our planet. Capitalism is overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process with the eventual goal of depleting the Earth's resources. Our modern industries are just so darned efficient that we can produce enough food, goods, houses, healthcare, etc for everyone on the Earth, yet we still have starving people, homeless people, people lacking access to healthcare, because capitalism means that goods go to those who can afford to pay for it. It results in accumulation for accumulation sake, and improper distribution of resources. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to one's needs and taking no more than absolutely necessary. The saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." The Earth's resources are finite and with the effects of climate change, we need a better system (rather than capitalism) to distribute the resources according to need. Because the current system, capitalism is overproduction and over consumption for the sake of profits.
    4
  6962. Indian Air Force lost half of its MiG fighter jets in deadly crashes. which have led to the deaths of some 171 pilots, 39 civilians and 8 persons from other services, over the last 40 years.. Because of this, the MiG is often nicknamed "Flying Coffins". Here is a list of known MiG crashes of Indian Air Force (IAF) Jul 6, 2017: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed in Jodhpur’s Balesar. Sep 10, 2016: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed in Barmer district of Rajasthan Jun 13, 2016: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed in Jodhpur, Rajasthan. Aug 24, 2015: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed near a village in Budgam district. May 8, 2015: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed in West Bengal’s Tantipara area. Jan 31, 2015: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed west of Jamnagar city.. May 27, 2014: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed in Bijbehara area of Anantnag district in Kashmir. Nov 8, 2013: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed near Jamnagar. Jul 15, 2013: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed at Uttarlai airbase in Rajasthan’s Barmer district. Even this new year in Jan 3, 2018, A MiG 29K crashed at Goa Airport.
    4
  6963. It's funny how America dislikes Chinese and dislikes Muslims, yet they supposedly care about Chinese Muslims.
    4
  6964. Chinese workers worked hard to make products like smartphones, computers, appliances, electronics, toys, clothing, sneakers, etc, cheap so that inflation in America is kept to minimum and the cost of living is lower than it should be. Think of the billions of dollars Americans saved over the years on living expenses, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can be spent elsewhere like on school fees, tuition fees, or cars and luxury items.
    4
  6965.  @TrickOrRetreat  You said: "Like in 2015 when they announced they would stop construction of 85 coal powered plants. Turns out that they secretly built 120. Not a single thing coming from the CCP has any truth to it." China had agreed to discontinue the 80 coal-powered plants that were the most polluting, but did China ever promise not to construct any more coal-powered plants? Those new 120 coal-powered plants were part of experimental less-polluting, more efficient coal power technology. The Communist Party of China had agreed to stop the construction of 80 coal-powered plants, but nowhere did China promised not to continue building coal plants, it's just that the newer coal plants are more efficient and less polluting.
    4
  6966.  @一个说话大声的中国人  The Boxer Rebellion, the Opium Wars, the Sacking of the Summer Palace, the signing away of Hong Kong and so on. Britain's misdeeds can't be made up for with the partition of India.
    4
  6967.  @xerozero976  Cyrus has a German surname, was born in America and is currently living in Canada. You expect Cyrus to give up his German surname, is that what you're asking?
    4
  6968.  @xerozero976  You said: "I have extensive experience of travel to China , and have deeply studied China including its cultures history traditions…" Which part of our vast country of China did you visit? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    4
  6969.  @gravy1219  You must have misread the news, China only stated that we will no longer cooperate with the U.S on areas such as climate change, it doesn't mean that China will not comply with other climate agreements held with other countries/organizations.
    4
  6970. In the West, you have a culture of political correctness where people are afraid to voice their honest opinions because of backlash, from people like the SJWs mentioned. Chinese aren't known for being politically correct and we have a term for SJWs, which we call báizuǒ 白左 (White Left, after the leftist movement in the West) The thing is, SJWs, leftists, and PC culture are spawned from the West, so why blame China when its your own culture's doing?
    4
  6971. I think you meant the U.S govt policy, because that is the modus operandi of the National Endowment for Democracy.
    4
  6972.  @zilun  "Any U.S. medical staff died from treating influenza patients so far? Like those treating patients infected with Wuhan Virus?" From 2016-2019, US healthcare workers have access to sufficient medical supplies, whereas in 2020 COVID-19 (that's its proper name btw) outbreak in USA, many healthcare workers are short of masks, gloves, goggles, faceshields, and PPE suits themselves so that's why many US healthcare workers got infected.
    4
  6973.  @kevinkarbonik2928  United States: "We will be boycotting the 2022 Beijing Olympics." Other 5 Eyes countries: "Us too!" United States: "SIKE! We will be sending 18 officials to attend the Olympics!" Other 5 Eyes: "Wait…what? How are we going to explain our boycott to Beijing now? Why are we even following the US anyway?"
    4
  6974.  @westerntaiwan6893  In 2012? Well, the ozone layer hole is already closing as recorded by NASA in 2019, so what seems to be the problem then?
    4
  6975.  @westerntaiwan6893  According to your source: China said last year it had already eliminated as much as 280,000 tonnes of annual ODS production capacity and was speeding up efforts to phase out other ozone-damaging chemicals. It signed the Montreal Protocol in 1991. China launched a special inspection campaign into 3,000 foam manufacturers across the country last year and promised to punish any breaches of the ban on ozone-depleting chemicals. It said in March that it had shut down two manufacturing spots that produced CFC-11. The Ministry of Ecology and Environment said late on Thursday it had paid close attention to the unexpected rise in global CFC-11 levels reported last year. It said its investigation into polyurethane foam makers had so far revealed no large-scale illegal use, but said enterprises involved in illegal activities had got better at covering up their operations. So it appears that the Chinese government is doing all it can to tackle the problem. And since NASA has reported the smallest ozone layer hole size on record in 2019, then what seems to be the problem?
    4
  6976.  @valuedcustomer8922  Collapse? USA is suffering from a pandemic crisis (450,000 dead from Covid-19), a healthcare crisis (shortage of PPE, hospital beds), an economic crisis (50 million unemployed), a social crisis (George Floyd/BLM protests) even a climate crisis (Texas icestorm, California wildfires) and to top it all off, a political crisis (Jan 6th Capitol Hill riots). Yet you're worried about alleged Chinese collapse?
    4
  6977. Many Indians (but not all) are still suffering from a "colonial mindset" that's been imposed on India as a result of British colonialism. Even though Britain has since physically decolonized from India, the "decolonization of the mind" is still ongoing, with some Indians still blindly worshiping their former colonial masters.
    4
  6978.  @TravelingThruLife  Agreed. One of the American late night shows interviewed American passers-by on the street with the question: "Can You Name a Country? Any Country?" youtu.be/kRh1zXFKC_o to hilarious results.
    4
  6979.  @TannerChung  I'm sure many Asians in Asia have heard of the term American Born Chinese (ABC) it's such a common term and it explains Asian American backgrounds succinctly.
    4
  6980.  @superduper5514  Does Philippines want to join the US against China if conflict breaks out in the Taiwan Strait? Then why host US military bases?
    4
  6981.  @wom_Bat  If you claim Taiwan is an independent nation, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there some force that's preventing Taiwan from joining the UN?
    4
  6982. Trump also worked well with Putin, and it's possible that had Trump been re-elected for a second term instead of Biden, then perhaps the USA might not be having this conflict with Russia right now. The Democrats seem to always have a grudge against Russia.
    4
  6983.  @MarkYeung1  China is Australia's biggest trading partner, whereas Australia is China's 8th. China could afford stop doing business with its 8th but Australia can't afford to lose its top trading partner.
    4
  6984. "I never understood why they were so transparent in the first place, to be honest." Perhaps the NED thinks people are gullible enough to take one look at the word "democracy" in their name, and to not question their motives. Or perhaps NED is actvely advertising for corporations to come join their fund-raising programs to enact regime change in other countries to the benefit of corporations.
    4
  6985.  @everythingandmore5537  Hong Kong was taken from China even before Mao Zedong came to power in the mainland. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    4
  6986.  @fcl3294  You said: "Mao killed 60 million mainland people And the CPC worships him" It was during Chinese Civil War, of course Chinese were killing Chinese. Just like in American Civil War, the Americans were killing Americans. Or Koreans killing their own during Korean War. Or Vietnamese during Vietnam War, or any civil war for that matter. But Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country, where the previous Kuomintang administration failed to do so during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1917-1949) for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established the ROC, China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but the West laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. The West even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realizing a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and he reunified China under communism, proclaiming the founding of the PRC in 1949. Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951 and if not for Chairman Mao, China today would most likely still be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today. So why shouldn't the communist party continue to worship our founding father of the PRC?
    4
  6987. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China....
    4
  6988. I've too heard of the Zumwalt-class and it's non-railguns. The Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy has launched 10,000-ton destroyers (or cruisers) known as the Type 055, that fields an assortment of anti-ship, anti-aircraft, anti-submarine, land-attack missiles, as well as the possibility of mounting a naval rail-gun in the future.
    4
  6989.  @markgreen8045  You accused Cyrus of spreading the CPC's message, but after watching Cyrus previous videos, he's consistently promoted the message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" so how is Cyrus a warmonger, given his peaceful message? So you're saying that Cyrus' message of peace is the same as the CPC?
    4
  6990. Chinese products are beginning to surpass those of USA. For example, in 2018 Huawei overtook Apple in sales as the world's 2nd largest smartphone company, after Samsung at number one. Source: Huawei overtakes Apple as world's second-biggest smartphone maker telegraph.co.uk/technology/2017/09/07/huawei-overtakes-apple-worlds-second-biggest-smartphone-maker/
    4
  6991. The transition to a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices from the uni-polar world dominated by one voice (that of the U.S and its allies) would not be complete without an alternative to the USD.
    4
  6992.  @kanokano3530  The Hong Kong extradition bill (that started this whole mess) was proposed because of a Hong Kong guy named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, and stuff her body in her suitcase, before flying back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice for his crime, but Hong Kong has no extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. Source: The Murder Case That Lit the Fuse in Hong Kong nytimes.com/2019/06/15/world/asia/hong-kong-murder-taiwan-extradition.html That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to Hong Kong extradition laws. Do the HK protestors even know what they are protesting for? Have they read the bill and understood its contents in their entirety?
    4
  6993.  @Spicysauced  Russia did in 2022 was in response to what the US did in Ukraine in 2014, during the Maiidan Revolution. And Russia is no longer the Soviet Union, yet even after the USSR dissolution, NATO kept expanding eastwards, right up to Russia's borders. Putin have been bring up NATO expansion but his words have fallen on deaf ears in the West.
    4
  6994.  @Z3N1T4  While it's true that English is the most common language in the Internet, statistics indicate that Chinese is the 2nd most common language in the Internet. Top 10 Languages used in the Internet (2021 Estimate) 1. English (1,531,179,460) 2. Chinese (1,477,137,209) 3. Spanish (516,655,099) 4. Arabic (447,572,891) 5. Portuguese (290,939,425) 6. Indonesian/Malaysian (306,327,093) 7. French (431,503,032) 8. Japanese (126,476,461) 9. Russian (145,934,462) 10. German (98,654,451) ... Source: Internet World Stats
    4
  6995. Americans stole Germany technology after WW2 too. At the beginning of WW2, American tanks were inferior to German tanks, but they absorbed Nazi Panzer (tank) technology afterwards, which is why American tanks became more powerful. The German airforce (Luftwaffe) had excellent aircraft designs, which were copied by Americans for their modern aircraft. Furthermore, the Nazi V2 Rocket Scientists were put to work by NASA for their Moon landing missions. Source: US theft of German Patents wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/patents.html So doesn't it mean that countries have been "stealing" from one another since time immemorial?
    4
  6996.  @futsk01  You said: "Speaking of protesting, are you even allowed to type here what would happen if you tried to protest in China?" Tens of thousands of protests occur each year in China. In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010. That's an average of 493 protests every day in 2010 in China.
    4
  6997.  @Jordie-c4k  Foreign investment flows into China increased to CNY 580.19 billion in January-August of 2024 from around CNY 500 billion in the previous period. (according to Trading Economics)
    4
  6998. "East Turkestan" is a false name coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists (including Nikita Bichurin) who intended the name to replace the common Western term for the region, Chinese Turkestan.
    4
  6999. @Hen. Jamz I watched American MTV videos and the African American rapper grope the scantily clad dancer's breasts and smack their buttocks, singing about how much they love women's bodies, how they love to smoke weed, and how much they love money. They throw money at strippers, rebel against authority (F**k the Police!) and promote "Thug Life" and gang violence. material desires and so on.. What messages are you trying to send to American youths who happen to stumble upon such videos?
    4
  7000.  @ay3514  Look at the West and they are bending over backwards to accommodate Muslims immigrants. Refugees are fleeing their conflict-ridden Islamic countries and flooding Western countries like United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France, etc, and they are under little pressure to adapt to their predominantly Christian host countries, much to the chagrin of local Westerners. Instead of assimilating into Western culture, Muslims carry on their traditions, like Muslim men marrying multiple wives, or Muslim women wearing the Muslim headveil out in public, and secretly, many Westerners are angry about this, but they can't voice their honest opinions for fear of being branded as "racists" (even though Islam is not a race) or "Islamophobe." Because of the culture of "politically correctness" that is overtaking the West. And the Muslims take Westerner's silence as acceptance of their ways so they are under little pressure to assimilate. Because the West lets them do whatever they want!
    4
  7001. @ALex T My command of the English language may be atrocious, but that has little to do with this discussion is it not? If you want to discuss putting people into prison, then it is America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate U.S prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity, that the U.S government is forced to release convicts back on to the streets, in order to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Having such a huge prison population also represents a significant drain on the country's resources for upkeep and maintenance. Worst thing is that many former convicts find it tough to reintegrate back into proper society, and many return to life of crime to make ends meet, and wound up behind bars once again. The Chinese government is providing Uighurs extremists (and potential extremists) a chance to turn away from their extremist beliefs, to receive a proper Chinese education, learn glorious Chinese history and to sing patriotic Chinese songs to cultivate a sense of nationalism and belonging to China. Once these Uighurs graduate, they'll have a broader range of opportunities to find work due to their proficiency in Mandarin Chinese, which is the language of business in China.
    4
  7002.  @eltyjamessmith3482  So because of a border dispute with India, China is somehow wrong? China has settled boundary dispute approximately of 20,000 km with 12 countries out of the 22,000 km and is yet to settle about 2,000 km of boundary involving India and Bhutan. -In 1961, Nepal and China signed border agreement. -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1991, USSR and China signed Sino-Soviet border agreement. -In 1992, Laos and China signed border agreement. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border agreement. -In 2011, Tajikistan ratified a 1999 deal with China. We solved our border disputes with literally all our land neighbors, only Bhutan and India remain. China has 21 talks with Bhutan and 19 talks with India, but still fail to settle our countries borders. Who's fault is it? Regarding Taiwan, the Nationalist Kuomintang lost the mainland to communists and had flee to Formosa (Taiwan). During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were crappy, and they had far fewer numbers (only 50 communist members in 1921) over the KMT. The KMT on the other hand, had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Taiwan? This demonstrates KMT's sheer incompetence in their right to rule the mainland.
    4
  7003.  @renegade7370  You suggested that perhaps the Russians launched the missile, because would the Ukrainians really be ignorant enough to use a missile system only they operate? But on the other hand, would the Russians be foolish enough to write the Russian message "For the Kids" on this missile that they allegedly fired?
    4
  7004. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    4
  7005.  @stopchinesecolonialism172  Get India (world's largest democracy) to build more toilets if you want to them to stop defecating in public.
    4
  7006. An increase in freedom of speech, comes with a decline in taking responsibility for what's being said.
    4
  7007. In 2017, China completed construction of the wrold's largest radio telescope, Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope's (FAST) also known as Tianyan 天眼 (Eye of the Heavens) that will help scientists learn more about the universe's early days, detect low-frequency gravitational waves and hunt for signals that may have been produced by distant alien civilizations. When it comes to radio dishes, a larger dish will be more sensitive and the potential to discover an alien civilization will be 5 to 10 times that of current equipment, as it can see farther and darker planets. Source:China Finishes Building World's Largest Radio Telescope space.com/33357-china-largest-radio-telescope-alien-life.html
    4
  7008. In my personal opinion, although Taiwan outwardly claims be democracy, it was ruled by single-party KMT for about 40 years. During this period, Taiwan experienced massive growth in industry and economy, but it is only once KMT lost power and DPP took over, did the relations between PRC and ROC became strained. Chinese leaders were familiar with dealing with KMT, and both shared similar goal of eventual reunification, but they had little idea of how to deal with DPP's agenda.
    4
  7009.  @perrychrispy1  What 99 year lease are you talking about? Hong Kong had been a British colony from 1841 to 1997 (156 years) so what 99 year lease are you talking about?
    4
  7010.  @perrychrispy1  The Hong Kong Extradition Treaty was proposed because of a certain incident. Some Hong Konger (named Chan) brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan, then proceeded to strangle her to death and stuff her body inside her suitcase, then flew back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body in Taiwan. Chan has since confessed and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to Taiwan to face justice, but Hong Kong realised that it had no existing extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's families. That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to Hong Kong's extradition treaty, in order to cover up this legal loophole. Do the young Hong Kong protestors even know what they are protesting about in the first place? Why should Hong Kong government give in to the demands of schoolkids you tell me?
    4
  7011.  @johngalt6525  Instead of refuting my points, this Andrew guy resorts to ad hominen attacks against me for my views. Even Andrew's first comment here is an ad hominen attack on the Barretts.
    4
  7012.  @Andrew-ib7gs  You're the one mocking the Barrett's Chinese proficiency here, yet you misspelled Xinjiang as Xiangjiang yourself, so who are you to criticise other people's Chinese proficiency when you got it wrong yourself? And since when does autocorrect replace Xinjiang with Xiangjiang? And what's this? You're okay with yourself criticising the Barretts' Chinese proficiency, but when I pointed out that you misspelled Xinjiang as Xiangjiang, you're labeling me a troll for criticising your own Chinese proficiency? What hypocrisy is this? Why the biased double standards?
    4
  7013. The Russ as in Russians? But Mongolia is sandwiched between Russia and China, so a "Great Russ Wall" would be located at the Mongolia-Russia border, not at the Mongolia-China border.
    4
  7014.  @johnnyrommel4113  About Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, Taiwan and the rest of mainland China, since the Qing Dynasty, China has been defined as a multi-ethnic country (not just Han Chinese). Just like the United States of America consist of Caucasian Americans (white), African Americans (black), Latin Americans (brown), Asian Americans (yellow) and Native Americans (red). Despite their cultural differences, as long as they are born in America (or acquired green card) they are Americans. Likewise, China consists of 55 different ethnic groups, including Han, Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchu, even Koreans in Northeastern China. As long as you're born in Chinese territory (which includes Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, Hong Kong, Taiwan, etc) then you are considered a Chinese citizen, similar to America's example above. Yet you're trying to alienate Tibetans, Uighurs, Hong Kongers from the rest of China?
    4
  7015.  @johnnyrommel4113  You yourself said: "Society changes and evolves." Then two lines later you said: "The rules were not supposed to change until 2047." so what's the meaning of this? There were endless riots across Hong Kong, so why can't Beijing change the rules due to the turbulent times? You yourself admitted that things need to change, but when China does it, suddenly it's wrong? You said: "China seems to want to adopt this position that they are a world power. I agree that they are the newest member of the club. But you don't begin your career by walking into a room and dictating terms to the guys who already been there for a long time." China is not a newcomer, China was a superpower long before the USA. Britain was colonial superpower during 19th century but was eventually overtaken by USA in 20th century. But prior to that, China (and also India) had been economic superpower for 1800 years and we made up 25% of the world's GDP share, according to world leading British economist, Angus Maddison. Source: Global distribution of GDP among China, India, Western Europe, USA, Middle East from 1 AD to 2003 AD wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA_Middle_East.png And judging from the above trend, it looks as though China is all set to dominate the 21st century. So China is merely returning to our original status that's all, it was Westerners that toppled China during the Opium Wars. Yet you're accusing China of dictating terms, when Westerners (the new superpowers) did the same thing to China (the original superpower) during the Opium Wars?
    4
  7016.  @yslee1401  Of course! Putting Meng under house arrest protects her from the CPC's clutches! It all makes sense now! Why didn't I think up such a conspiracy theory myself!
    4
  7017.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou If Russia's objective is the Eastern Ukraine Russian speaking area, why did it constantly attack other Ukrainian cities such as Kyiv, Mariupol, Chernobyl, Odessa that are nowhere near?" Mariupol is literally located in Eastern Ukraine, in Donetsk where the Azov Battalion are stationed and fighting against Donetsk Republic forces. Russian forces negotiated to allow Ukrainian forces to continue maintaining Chernobyl. Russian forces have encircled Kiev but did not attack the city. Turns out that in the footage of a missile slamming into an apartment in Kiev and leaving a massive hole in the building was an Ukrainian BUK missile, not a Russian missile, that apparently malfunctioned and hit their own civilian building. Russia has not attacked Odessa. You said: "Chinese people have the right to know the truth." Yes, why is it that a Chinese like you don't even know the truth, and just blindly consume Western media without hearing news from the other side?
    4
  7018. The problem is that what if one day in the future, the rest of the world no longer accepts your cash? Everything you described, you can also do that with digital currency. Yard sales, farmers, banking, etc, all those transactions can be made with digital currency.
    4
  7019.  @TeoDP7  Korean War: Korea was once a single unified country during Joseon Dynasty, until Korea was occupied by the Japanese during WWII. After the Japanese surrendered, Korea was (needlessly) divided into North Korea (Soviet Union) and South Korea (USA). North Korea was the strong country on the peninsula and wanted to end this humiliating division of their country, and they almost succeeded. North Korea had achieved around 90% unification, until the USA suddenly declare war on North Korea and intervened in this Korean Civil War. The Americans pushed the North Koreans back past the 38th Line of Division and into actual North Korean territory, right up to China's doorstep (i.e Liaoning province). In the end China agreed to help North Korea push the Americans and South Koreans back to the 38th Line of Division. In the end, it's apparent that USA was one of the two nations responsible for the partition of Korea (specifically, the creation of South Korea), so if you ask whether the USA is a troublemaker or peacemaker in this scenario, I would say troublemaker. After all, why was a single country like Korea, needlessly partitioned into two? If Korea was kept as a single country, then there would be no North Korea and South Korea to even speak of. ... (I also found it strange that you yourself admitted that you are not American, you're from Slovakia. But in your long post, you kept on using "we" when attempting to justify American wars. Did you copy that post from somewhere?)
    4
  7020. Once Bhutan changes its stance, Indian government would lose the reason for Indian troops presence in that territory and would be forced to withdraw. Its much more preferable to direct war between India and China. Bhutan stands to lose the most if such war were to break out over this territorial dispute.
    4
  7021.  @Andy-P  You said: "So why doesn't China plan for them to fall in the ocean. It's not beyond their ability." Chinese rocket debris have been falling into the Pacific Ocean, which Chinese space debris has fallen on land and not water?
    4
  7022.  @Libertas-ws6eo  Nevertheless, Galileo was proven right in the end. That's why we know of his name and his theories, and not of those who criticised him. It's a Chinese proverb that has stood the test of time and I'm sure there's an English equivalent of this proverb somewhere.
    4
  7023. Zhou Enlai once proposed India-China cooperation according to the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence 和平共处五项原则 which outline essential details to define our relations.
    4
  7024.  @df9440  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    4
  7025.  @juanreese6933  I've spoken with Chinese Americans who speak fluent English and thoroughly embraced American culture, far more than Westerners who spoke fluent Mandarin Chinese, how's this not proof of Chinese being better at assimilating than Westerners? Even you've admitted that the Anglo will never accept the nuisances of the Chines culture, that just shows Westerners generally don't assimilate well as compared to Chinese.
    4
  7026.  @juanreese6933  You said: "It’s best for humanity that the European stay in power. Asians as whole are better situated with other Asians." But the Westerners constitute a minority of the world's population, compared to Asians, who make up the majority. Why then should humanity remain under the yoke of the minority and not the majority? You said: "But Asian imperialism and hegemony would be less tolerable than Anglo hegemony due to the obstinacy of the implacable Asian culture." About Asian Imperialism, I can't speak for Japanese Imperialism during WWII, but China never had dreams of imperialism throughout its 5,000 years of history, since there have been no overseas colonies founded by China (unlike European colonialism). As for "Asian Culture", I personally do not see what's so intolerable about a culture that promotes hard work and studious behavior.
    4
  7027. In 2020, people thought by 2021, the pandemic will be over. Now in 2021, people think that by 2022, the pandemic will be over. The most likely outcome is that the pandemic will stay with us for a while.
    4
  7028.  @pontuslind7736  You said: "NATO is not offensive alliance since the population of their democratic countries would not allow a offensive war." How is NATO not an offensive alliance? How do you explain the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia? Or the 2011 NATO military interventions in Libya? Or NATO's intervention in Afghanistan? NATO was formed in response to the Soviet Union, but since the USSR dissolution in 1991, NATO no longer serves any interests, except perhaps the U.S interests in maintaining it's hegemonic rule. NATO is most certainly not defensive in nature, they've expanded into 10+ countries and is expanding eastwards towards Russia.
    4
  7029. What did Taiwan do for Mexico as compared to the mainland? Jack Ma donated 50,000 virus test kits and 100,000 face masks to Mexico. Source: Chinese foundations donate 50,000 virus test kits, 100,000 face masks mexiconewsdaily.com/news/coronavirus/chinese-foundations-donate-50000-virus-test-kit/
    4
  7030.  @johnnyrommel4113  What genocide in Xinjiang? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    4
  7031.  @GMATveteran  The thing is that people shouldn't "project" onto China (and also Russia) what the U.S is doing. Even after Russian oligarchs had their private assets seized by the West, Russia is not retaliating in kind by nationalizing McDonald's and other companies assets in Russia. Russia is leaving the door open in case Western companies decide to come back to Russia. Likewise, China shouldn't freeze Western assets if the West decide to freeze Chinese assets.
    4
  7032. Japan and South Korea aren't eager to sign onto the U.S Chip Act too.
    4
  7033.  @MarkYeung1  Because capitalists want to further shrink worker wages in order to skim off a wider profit margin for themselves. So the companies from capitalist countries shift their factories to China, bringing corruption and pollution to our country. China has air pollution problems, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/j3J196bLP5E
    4
  7034.  @MarkYeung1  Westerners have been polluting the Earth since 200-300 years ago, back when the Industrial Revolution started in 1700-1800s. Whereas China only recently industrialised some 40 years ago in comparison.
    4
  7035.  @mrteacher1315  Well, since the rich are getting richer in the United States and the poor are getting poorer, it's possible that the 1% might become the 0.05% (if it isn't already).
    4
  7036.  @ChiefCabioch  The Russians haven't been asking for any help from anybody, but you can't say the same for Zelenskyy constantly asking for more weapons.
    4
  7037.  @lindigregory119  You said: "Just think of it ...in order to take control of the country......how many of his Own People did Mao slaughter..between 80 and 100 Million." It was a Chinese Civil War, of course Chinese were killing Chinese. Just like during the American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans. Or Vietnamese killing Vietnamese during the Vietnam War. Or Koreans during Korean War. Or any civil war for that matter. But Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period for 37 years.
    4
  7038.  @lindigregory119  You said: "Then he killed the ancient and rich Chinese culture. Most Chinese people today have no idea about the ancient Chinese history that existed for thousands of years up until Mao." What makes you say Chinese culture is destroyed and most Chinese people today have no idea of our history? China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Egypt, Mesopotamia and Rome have since succumbed to history. Throughout our history, China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to the modern day relatively intact. I mean, China has many historical monuments like for example, the The Great Wall of China, the Forbidden City, The Qin Emperor Tomb (China's First Emperor), the Terracotta Army, The Grand Canal (world's longest artificial river). If you look up list of UNESCO World Heritage Sites, China actually ranks 2nd in the world after Italy. Countries by number of UNESCO World Heritage Sites as of July 2021 1. Italy (58 sites) 2. China (56 sites) 3. Germany (51 sites) 4. France (49 sites) 5. Spain (49 sites) 6. India (40 sites) 7. Mexico (35 sites) 8. United Kingdom (33 sites) 9. Russia (30 sites) 10. Iran (26 sites) ... Source: UNESCO World Heritage Yet you claim Chinese culture is destroyed and most Chinese don't know about our history?
    4
  7039. A Chinese vaccine has been approved for human testing at virus epicentre. Source: Chinese vaccine approved for human testing at virus epicentre straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/chinese-vaccine-approved-for-human-testing-at-virus-epicentre
    4
  7040.  @currentchannel3452  China owes the world an answer? China allowed a World Health Organization investigation team into Wuhan on Jan 2021, and the team visited Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Their findings reveal that the virus entered the market from the outside, and they've all but dismissed the possibility of a lab leak as highly unlikely.
    4
  7041.  @stopwarstop7334  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    4
  7042.  @stopwarstop7334  If you go and look at Taiwan's constitution, it states that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    4
  7043. @Conscience Observer Why President Trump need to personally come down to Asia to negotiate trade deals? While President Xi Jinping usually just make phonecalls or send letters to America?
    4
  7044. One thing I've come to realize is that the "Nobel Peace Prize" has since deviated from it's original intention, and has long been hijacked and weaponized by the United States to wield against their opponents, in order to further U.S interests at the expense of others.
    4
  7045.  @item6931  Besides hydroelectricity, China also dominates solar power production and China has the highest solar power capacity in the world. The world's largest floating solar farm is located in Anhui in China.
    4
  7046. Then why did you mention "the Syrian government is not an elected government" and talk about the whole election system in the first place? Every country should follow its own system, and if the Syrians want (or don't want) such a system, then its up to themselves to either support or get rid of it themselves. Why is the USA interjecting into this by bombing Syria? It should be up to Syrians to either topple or support the government, not the Americans. Just like why did USA invade Libya and Iraq and cut off the country's heads like Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein? This is not the first time USA is doing something similar and the Assad Regime is apparently next on this list. If in the future, suddenly Iran becomes a target of the USA (Already US slapped sanctions on Iran nuclear development) then are you still going to support US military intervention every time? You don't trust the Chinese government not exporting our government system, but you support USA spreading democracy like what old Soviet Union did with communism?
    4
  7047. You do not support US interventions, but it is clear that USA is attempting to spread democracy in Middle East by disposing of dictators like Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein. But what happened to those countries after their leader was gone? They became US puppets in the end. Now the USA is targeting the Assad Regime, then what do you think will happen if Assad is gone? Won't Syria become another US puppet as well, following this pattern? As for the chemical weapons, those are just unconfirmed rumors, just like when USA invaded Iraq on suspicions of harboring WMDs, even though no WMDs was ever found after the Iraq war. So why you still think Syria has chemical weapons, when its obviously just an excuse for US to intervene? I mean, USA has history of spreading democracy, just like Soviet Union with communism, yet you are skeptical of China when the government says that our system is not for export?
    4
  7048. As a Chinese, I'll pick (D) of course. But on the Western democracies' answer sheet, the politically-correct answer would "anyone but (D)".
    4
  7049.  @ivanthegreat2.070  China's current political system has shown to be viable for our country, so why is there a need to introduce democracy? Why do you think that allowing ordinary people to make political decisions regarding the country's future is a wise idea? Not all countries need to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    4
  7050.  @fiddleriddlediddlediddle  Because our tiny amount of people are all politicians, whom have shown to have experience in governing a country of 1.4 billion people. I mean, why do you entrust ordinary people to make political decisions regarding your country's future? It makes no sense. Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (e.g they may not turn up to vote in elections, or they submit blank votes) or they may base their decisions on emotions not logic (e.g Many British people don't like immigrants, so majority voted for Brexit) or they may be easily influenced by foreign powers (e.g Russian interference in US elections) Or they may simply lack political awareness of their country's situation to make informed decisions regarding the country's future. Why not let those who know how to govern, govern? That's what China is doing and look at how successful China is.
    4
  7051.  @Miquelalalaa  When did I deny these schools like you said? And all I said here in this thread is about Chinese food, so how is that defending the Chinese Communist Party?
    4
  7052. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since faded to history. Even our Chinese characters have been continuously in use since 1200 BCE, wheres other ancient scripts like Sumerian cuneiform (Mesopotamia) Latin (Rome) and Egyptian Hieroglyphs have since fallen out of use and become dead languages.
    4
  7053. The truth is that when humans procreate naturally, its a completely random splicing of human genes, a chaotic mixing of parents genes, generating billions of traits and attributes, and possibly removing old defects and creating some new defects in the process. Get it? Its truly random, and just as likely and just as unlikely to result in removal of defects or creation of new ones, whenever humans procreate naturally.
    4
  7054. I think the hope lies on the next Taiwan election in 2024. If the KMT wins, then it would possibly lead to reduced cross-strait tensions.
    4
  7055.  @augustuswoods4548  Today, Mongolia is always welcome to attempt to take on modern China's army, the People's Liberation Army (the world's largest land army) if Mongolia want to claim Tibet. The point is that the Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. I mean, why don't you ask Americans to give up Hawaii and Guam then?
    4
  7056.  @augustuswoods4548  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. All verified eyewitness accounts present in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    4
  7057.  @richarde.halliburton8022  Where's your evidence that CPC-connected student associations are watching over anyone who tries to speak out? What about Chinese students from Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan?
    4
  7058.  @augustuswoods4548  Quora is a question-and-answer website, filled with opinions that's all, how's that reliable? According to Jay Matthews, reporter for The Washington Post as far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 and all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. Source: The Myth of Tiananmen: And the price of a passive press (By Jay Mathews) archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php
    4
  7059.  @augustuswoods4548  How exactly am I missing the point? I put forth my arguments using logic and citing sources where possible, but you people just claim I'm an ultra-nationalist, just for putting forth my side of the argument. How? You people criticise China, that's fine, then why can't I defend China's policies? I mean, why don't you tell all non-Native Americans, Canadians and Australians to Get Out of America and Australia and leave those lands to Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, if you think Tibet isn't part of China? I don't want to resort to what-about-ism, but since you brought up Native Americans, then you're know that the double standards Westerners have imposed on China.
    4
  7060.  @augustuswoods4548  Even Wikileaks has stated that there was No Bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989. A Chilean diplomat (Carlos Gallo) who had been positioned next to a Red Cross station inside the square told his US counterparts that he did not observe any mass firing of weapons into the crowds in the Square. Source: Wikileaks: no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square, cables claim telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8555142/Wikileaks-no-bloodshed-inside-Tiananmen-Square-cables-claim.html
    4
  7061.  Narglar Wing  "神州 Shenzhou you're turning this into a massive defense of your current government." Is there something wrong with my defending the current government? After all, the Communist Party of China is still the same government party as it was during Chairman Mao era, so what's your point? The CPC is the same political entity during Chairman Mao era as it is today, so what's wrong with defending it? And during the Great Leap Forward (1959-1962) period, overall, China's population actually increased by an estimated 48 million from 1955-1960 (as shown in my source). What evidence did you even give to explain your bloated death toll figure of Mao killing 45 million in four years?
    4
  7062.  @augustuswoods4548  "This is why I'm not bothering to respond to your statement about Native Americans, since that is not at all the point." You are the one who brought up the topic Native Americans here, yet when I elaborated on how their lands are still occupied today by non-Native Americans and Canadians, you decided not to respond further? That means that you're aware of the biased double standards the West has on China, but refuse to comment further on it, instead you rather point at China reclaiming Tibet (which was part of Chinese history since 800 years ago). You foreigners can criticise China negatively, but when I as a Chinese, bring up China's positive achievements, suddenly, I'm the one spreading pure propaganda? China has made numerous achievements under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, why is my pointing them out propaganda, but you painting China negatively not? Could you point out how my narrative is incomplete? Take Tibet for example, I've shown maps that Tibet was part of Chinese history since 800 years ago. I've pointed out that the 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and that he received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the central government. I've even shown that the Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So exactly which narrative am I missing out?
    4
  7063.  @richarde.halliburton8022  You said: "Taiwan joined the other burgeoning democracies - South Korea and Japan, in an economic miracle of progress from the end of WWII" Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: White Terror (Taiwan) wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Terror_(Taiwan) But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Source: Taiwan Miracle wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_Miracle Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Taiwan's economy has since stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving the island to seek employment opportunities on the mainland. So in other words, Taiwan's massive economic miracle was achieved under authoritarian, single-party KMT rule, not because of democracy that Taiwan flourished. Look at the Taiwan economic miracle and it occurred under the authoritarian rule of Kuomintang. Under democratic multi-party system, Taiwan is struggling today.
    4
  7064.  @richarde.halliburton8022  So according to you, it's collectivism and corruption that's responsible for the starvation during the GLF, then what makes you think ROC government isn't corrupt? Earlier, you even agreed that the Chiang regime was grossly corrupt and incompetent. Here are your own words: "神州 Shenzhou This is an area where we agree - that the Chiang regime was grossly corrupt and incompetent." Yet now you magically sing the praise that KMT would have done a much better job at governing the mainland than the communists? How? You're using hypothetical scenarios without proofs, whereas I'm using KMT history of famines and incompetence to justify how KMT won't do a better job than the Communists. The Kuomintang was so corrupt, that they received plenty of U.S military aid, but they pocketed some $750,000,000 worth of U.S military aid, until even the then US President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves." Source: "President Truman wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves" having stolen some $750 million dollars of US funds" voltairenet.org/article177063.html How does your argument that KMT would do a better job than the communists even hold water, when it's full of holes?
    4
  7065.  @richarde.halliburton8022  The Red Army was comprise of mostly dirt-poor, poorly trained, starving communist peasant conscripts, heavily outnumbered by the vastly superior Nationalist Kuomintang, with their massive wealth (taxed from peasants), US military aid, and superior numbers over the communists. Who started the Chinese Civil War? It was the Northern Expedition where Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek decided to conduct full-scale purging of Communists in all areas under their control, resulting in what's known as the Shanghai Massacre, that started this whole Chinese Civil War. Source: Northern Expedition wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Expedition Source: Shanghai Massacre wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_massacre So it was the Nationalist Kuomintang that started the whole Chinese Civil War with the Communists.
    4
  7066.  @richarde.halliburton8022  Earlier you said (and I quote your words) that "神州 Shenzhou This is an area where we agree - that the Chiang regime was grossly corrupt and incompetent." But out of nowhere, you suddenly magically claim KMT can do a better job than the Communists, even though ROC 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) has a long history of famine. I present evidence for KMT's failure, you presented nothing to indicate KMT's possible success instead of the Communists.
    4
  7067.  @zackk4969  Then explain why is China currently the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people? What's the name of the renowned Chinese writer in Chinese characters?
    4
  7068. America is suffering from a pandemic crisis (230,000 dead from Covid-19), a healthcare crisis (shortage of PPE), an economic crisis (50 million unemployed), a social crisis (George Floyd/BLM protests), even a climate crisis (California wildfires, hurricane flooding) and to top it all off, a leadership crisis (the Trump administration). Yet USA is ooohhh soo concerned about how China treats minorities in our country.
    4
  7069. Hong Kong will eventually be fully returned back to China by 2047 anyway, once the Sino-British declaration finally expires after 50 years. Chinese government is patient and there's no need to lift a finger and eventually Hong Kong will eventually be fully reunited with the mainland in the future.
    4
  7070.  @JB52520  If not "anglosaxon" then 5 Eyes is a substitute.
    4
  7071.  @blimpusa  怎么翻译到种族灭绝？
    4
  7072. Many in the West also blame China for fixing China's own internal problems in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region. It's almost as though China can do nothing good in many Westerners' eyes
    4
  7073.  @dannytadashi4235  Meng Wanzhou will be coming back, but as for the 2 Michaels, Spavor has been convicted of espionage and sentence to 11 years imprisonment, while Korvig is similarly charged with espionage. China should punish people who violate Chinese law while in China.
    4
  7074.  @junebug8485  You said: "My point was it's not as widespread as western culture" Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have revolutionized their respective industries. Paper and Printing have made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge much easier. The Compass made navigation easier during journeys where the Sun or stars aren't visible for navigation. And Gunpowder has revolutionized the way modern wars are fought.
    4
  7075.  @benzynowypiotrek  China seeks win-win cooperation, while the US only sees a zero sum game.
    4
  7076.  @AutoAllan  You're lucky that the anti-Asian hate crime hasn't reached you. But however, Vancouver has experienced a whopping 717% increase in anti-Asian hate crimes, reflecting a legacy of discrimination in a country seen as welcoming of newcomers, according to The Guardian. So while that hasn't happened to you, that doesn't mean that it's not happening to other people of Asian descent.
    4
  7077. Trel carbyx So what exactly aggression did China commit on Philippines at all, as compared to Americans and Japanese invasion and occupation? Did China invade Philippines and occupy it like USA and Japan? Then what aggression are you talking about? Your Philippines fishermen need to earn living, but Chinese fishermen don't need to? You claim Chinese aggressive behavior, but did Chinese coastguard kill any Philippines fishermen? When Philippines became independent from America, Scarborough Shoal was not part of Philippines territory, so why Philippines now suddenly claiming that it is there's? In the past, both Chinese and Philippines fishermen fish there together, but Philippines coastguard began harass Chinese fishermen, so that's why Chinese coastguard emerge to safeguard our sovereignty.
    4
  7078. +Trel carbyx In modern century, China did not wage wars on the same scale as Japan and USA, so what makes you think Japan and US are far more greater than China? Did China invade Philippines like what USA and Japan did to your country? As for South China Sea Islands, China first claim those territory back in 1947, under ROC's 11 dash line, which PRC's 9 dash lines is based upon. Nobody objected to China's claim back then, not Vietnam, nor Philippines. North Vietnam had acknowledged that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese. When Philippines became independent, it did not include Scarborough Shoals within its national boundaries. Even USA supported China's claim, and sent warships to help China reclaim those islands. But then slowly Philippines and Vietnam began encroach on Chinese territory. Philippines crash an old rusting WW2 vessel in 1999 onto one of our islands and began secretly removing Chinese markers. Chinese government protested and offered to help Philippines by sending ships to remove the vessel, but Philippines declined Instead they began reinforcing it to prevent it from disintegrating, so that they can claim our territory. So who exactly who is being sneaky here? If Philippines object to China's claim, why didn't you voice it out back in 1947, when China first made the claim? Taiwan independence is not recognized by many countries over the world, including USA, UK, France, etc, even Philippines. Chinese PLA troops continue to patrol our land at Donglong, not Bhutanese troops. The Diaoyu islands were historically Chinese, but stolen from us by Japan during the war. After Japanese WW2 surrender, Japan pledged to return all its occupied territory, so shouldn't the lands be returned to China? You are just biased against China that's all in your views. You complain of so-called Chinese "aggression" when China did not invade Philippines at all, but forgive Japan and USA when they invade and occupied your lands already shows that you have prejudice against different countries.
    4
  7079.  @ivanmunoz4484  Imperial Japan clearly refused to surrender even after 2 atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, mostly killing Japanese civilians, women, children, the elderly, and men unfit for active frontline miltary duty. The vast bulk of Japanese Army strength remained unaffected by the US bombing of civilian structures, and that's why Imperial Japan refused to surrender. Because US atomic bombings killed civilians, not soldiers, so the Japanese Army could in fact continue fighting. It was only after the Soviet invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria (the last campaign fought of WWII) that finally caused Japan to surrender at the end of WWII. So if anything, we should be thanking the Soviet communists for finally putting an end to WWII.
    4
  7080.  @ivanmunoz4484  The United States only joined WW2 because the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, not for Russia's or China's sake. And the U.S nuclear bombing of Japanese cities mostly killed civilians, not soldiers and the change in Japanese Army strength was negligible after the bombings, and that's why Japan refused to surrender. It took the Soviet Invasion of Japanese occupied Manchuria (the last campaign fought of WWII) to finally cause Japan to surrender, so shouldn't we be grateful for the Soviets communists for putting an end to WWII?
    4
  7081.  @jonathanhe7676  So you're saying Taiwan cannot declare independence because of something controlling Taiwan and preventing them from doing so? Then you're just confirming the fact that Taiwan just isn't independent then. Isn't that why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like any independent country can?
    4
  7082. Taken from an article: The Diplomat: The Shanghai Communique: An American Foreign Policy Success, 45 Years Later On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia...The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position.
    4
  7083. Seems like if one is anonymous, they can just change their name at will and audiences still believe what they say.
    4
  7084.  Joel Turley  Why don't you ask Canada to release Meng Wanzhou if you want the two Canadians to be released?
    4
  7085.  @bhushanjss  China don't force other countries to borrow money from our banks, neither do we tell them how much to borrow. The Sri Lankan government choose to borrow too much that it could pay off in Hambantota Port, so they leased the port to China for 99-years. But after 99-years, Hambantota port will be returned to Sri Lanka and its debts considered paid off. The former US president Bush invaded Iraq on suspicion of harboring weapons of mass destruction, but afterwards, no WMDs were ever found in Iraq. Even the UN General Secretary Kofi Annan had labelled the Iraq War as illegal and violated UN Charter. Source: Iraq war was illegal and breached UN charter, says Annan theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/16/iraq.iraq
    4
  7086. Chinese celebrate our martial arts tradition (Everybody loves Kung Fu fighting!) yet BBC must label it as propaganda?
    4
  7087.  @nobody-wd9ge  Why don't you Indians resolve your border dispute with Nepal instead of starting another with China? Video: India-Nepal Border Dispute| ‘Won’t Accept Artificial Enlargement of Territorial Claims': MEA youtu.be/9VmxZOn8Y7o
    4
  7088. Humans skin animals all the time, look at alligator boots, leather bags, mink fur coats. But why is it horrible when it applied to cats?
    4
  7089. The Kubuqi solar power plant doesn't make use of solar panels, instead it uses mirrors to focus the Sun's rays to heat up the top of the tower containing molten salt, which is used to heat up water to steam to drive turbines and generate electricity.
    4
  7090. Those people starved, Mao did not murder them.
    4
  7091. Why is China the country with the world's largest population if you claimed Mao is mass murderer?
    4
  7092.  @abhishekshandilya226  Back in December 2019, there no indication of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus. The first human-to-human transmission in China was confirmed only in 20th January 2020 and that's when the government began implementing quarantine measures shortly after. Source: China confirms human-to-human transmission of coronavirus theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/20/coronavirus-spreads-to-beijing-as-china-confirms-new-cases
    4
  7093.  @abhishekshandilya226  Dr Li Wenliang was spreading rumours about the coronavirus being SARS (which is clearly untrue, Covid-19 is not SARS) so the government stepped in to stop the spread of unproven rumours. There was no actual indication of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus back in December 2019, so what for implement lockdown? The first human-to-human transmission case in China was confirmed only in 20th January 2020 and that's when the government began implementing quarantine measures shortly after. Source: China confirms first human-to-human transmission of virus; 3 dead, over 225 infected msn.com/en-in/news/world/china-confirms-first-human-to-human-transmission-of-virus-3-dead-over-225-infected/ar-BBZ9mxv (Dated to 20th Jan 2020) The government is acting based on actual information received on the ground, not rumors and hearsay.
    4
  7094. The win-win model pursued by China is more sustainable compared to the zero sum game model pursued by the United States in my opinion.
    4
  7095. Many Chinese are optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners are pessimistic and have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    4
  7096. Chinese aggression? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    4
  7097.  @MarkYeung1  Mainland education does teach the Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution as part of the school curriculum. But again the point of National Education is to reintroduce Hong Kong kids back to their Chinese roots. But there's nothing to be done for decolonizing the minds of those Hong Kong people who left to live in the West, they have to recognise the colonizer's ideas pervading their thoughts and influencing their attitudes towards their homeland.
    4
  7098.  @raymondhoffman3587  But the number of Hong Kong journalists covering the riots was insane, they literally outnumber the Hong Kong police so why was there an insane amount of coverage given to Hong Kong riots, when other ongoing protests (such as those in France) got far lesser coverage?
    4
  7099.  @storage4539  Actually, it's the opposite of what you said. The Hong Kong Police Force treated the 2019 Hong Kong rioters like actual human beings, that's why there were zero deaths by the HKPF during the 2019 Hong Kong riots. On the other hand, while Hong Kong was previously under British Colonial rule, there were 51 deaths during the 1967 Hong Kong riots and 59 deaths during the 1956 Hong Kong riots, so it just goes to show that the British dehumanized the Hong Kongers back then. It's a testament to how far HKPF has come since after the 1997 handover, and a demonstration of the incredible restraint of the HKPF that there were 0 deaths by the HKPF during the 2019 Hong Kong riots.
    4
  7100.  @Saint696Anger  China is world's largest market for automation and we recently unveiled Asia's first fully automated port in Qingdao, that is more efficient and can operate with minimal manpower for 24/7, even continuing loading and unloading cargo even at night under complete darkness! Video: Asia's first fully-automated port sets new record youtube.com/watch?v=r0saKRkVvx8 China is making great strides in Artificial Intelligence too, we recently unveiled the world's first AI News Anchor, and we are developing self-driving cars that can someday make use of China 5G network and we are world leader in facial recognition software.
    4
  7101. @Panda Bear China has over 50 ethnic groups including Han, Tibetan, Uighur, Manchu, Mongolians, and even some Koreans in Northeastern China, and ethnic minorities in China enjoy certain privilege over Han. Ethnic minorities in China are not subject to the One Child Policy (now Two-Child Policy) and they enjoy free education up to university level, healthcare benefits, tax exemptions, educational bursaries and so on. For example, if applying for college degree, if a Han candidate needs 500 points to qualify for this course, then ethnic minority (like Tibetan, Uighur, etc) need only 300 points (easier to apply) to qualify for the same course as Han Chinese. But when it comes to actual employment, it depends on the employer's preferences. For example, Mandarin Chinese is the language of business in China, so most employers want to hire Mandarin-speaking Chinese over the ethnic minorities.
    4
  7102. China and Russia are facilitating the transition towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, rather than the uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and its "allies")
    4
  7103. sam water Why are you constantly being so rude here? I quoted actual policies and used logic to support my points, but all you done is constant hurl personal insults against me, instead of attacking my points.
    4
  7104.  @GMK189-f2k  It's your funeral then.
    4
  7105. Shenzhen is not modern-ising. ... Shenzhen is future-rising
    4
  7106. Majority of those Hong Kong protestors are students, who haven't even graduated from school yet they already think they know how to best govern Hong Kong? Their teenage minds haven't even matured, and they haven't even stepped out into the the real working world of adults and find a job, yet they already think they know real world politics?
    4
  7107. Peng Shuai's previous relationship with a much older man has been revealed, so she's trying to keep a low profile, that's why she's been avoiding the public eye recently. But the WTA are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private affairs for all the world to see, instead of respecting her privacy.
    4
  7108. China is changing so rapidly such that even after 10 years, so much has changed in China since his last visit.
    4
  7109.  @peabase  Can I ask which personal freedoms has Beijing imposed upon Hong Kong people then? Hong Kong has laws that would be considered illegal in the mainland (such as supporting Falun Dafa) so how exactly are their freedoms being affected then? So when mainland cities like Shanghai overtakes Hong Kong as global financial center, then what's Hong Kong going to do? Source: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks
    4
  7110.  @mfmf100   Many Hong Kong graduates also seek job opportunities in the mainland, and some pick up Mandarin in order to do business with the mainland. Mandarin Chinese is also the most spoken language in the world (by number of speakers) and is also the official language of Singapore and Taiwan too, so generally there is greater incentive to learn Mandarin over Cantonese. And you specifically said "traditions" so why can't I mention that Hong Kong people practice Chinese traditions too? And if Hong Kong have all those institutions, then why are they so resentful of mainland China? China is the only country in the world willing to tolerate multiple political systems within our nation, under the One Country, Two Systems Policy. No other country in the world is willing to have two different political systems existing within its borders.
    4
  7111.  @krypton7807  I know that there's a usually a bunch of bots that go around on Cyrus channel promoting cryptocurrency, claiming how much money they invested and telling others to buy up shares quickly. It's part of the scheme to raise cryptocurrency shares so that criminals can profit, money can be laundered and ransomware hackers can get paid in Bitcoin, so it can't be traced back to them. Furthermore, Bitcoin mining itself consumes more electricity than the entire power consumption of some countries, and if the power is drawn from fossil fuels, then why are we burning more fuel to produce CO2 just so that people can mine Bitcoin? And for what goal eventually? So that a handful of people can get rich at the expense of numerous others, and at the expense of the environment?
    4
  7112.  @krypton7807  Even if you don't believe in climate change, you can't deny the fact that Bitcoin mining consumes wasteful amounts of electricity, more than the power consumption of some small countries in fact. And to what purpose? Allowing crooks to launder money or hackers to receive random that can't be traced back to them?
    4
  7113.  @FAILkipedia  The cluster missile that landed in Kramatorsk was the Soviet era Tochka-U missile used by the Ukrainian military, but not the Russian military.
    4
  7114.  @FAILkipedia  The cluster missile that landed in Kramatorsk was the Soviet era Tochka-U missile used by the Ukrainian military, but not the Russian military, and the missile was launched from Ukrainian-controlled territory.
    4
  7115. Many Chinese warmly welcome Americans to our lands as visitors (just ask the expats here). However, many Americans are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands with suspicion.
    4
  7116. So Jenkins, you've just proven that Taiwan isn't an independent country after all.
    4
  7117.  @christopherhamlin6139  "神州 Shenzhou I'm talking about reality and the reality is that the decision about what happens to Taiwan is not China's decision to make." Then why is it Taiwan cannot join the UN like an independent country can? Why is it athletes from Taiwan can only participate in the Olympics under the banner of "Chinese Taipei"?
    4
  7118.  @christopherhamlin6139  You said: "If you are naïve enough to think the US will honor the One China policy if China makes a move on Taiwan then I have a bridge in Taipei I'd like to sell to you." I never said that, but earlier you said (and I quote your words) "神州 Shenzhou Taiwan is as independent as the US says it is and don't you EVER forget that!" and currently, the United States recognizes the One China policy that Taiwan is part of China since the 1972 Shanghai Communique. "On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique... The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position." ... Source: The Diplomat: The Shanghai Communique
    4
  7119. Many Westerners would scoff at the notion of calling USA a "regime". That's a word reserved for China, Russia, North Korea and other countries that USA perceives as a threat.
    4
  7120.  @kungflunazi9445  "China is in terminal decline" Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    4
  7121. It's sadly propagated by the stereotype of Asian women as being "cheap" (which isn't true, it's just a stereotype).
    4
  7122.  @marcin123G  Brave New Europe published an article entitled: Peace for Ukraine, authored by a former UN Secretary General. On March 28, Putin, as a sign of goodwill and in support of the peace negotiations, declared readiness to withdraw troops from the Kharkov area and the Kiev area; this apparently occurred even before his public announcement. ... (Source: Brave New Europe: Peace For Ukraine)
    4
  7123.  @valuedcustomer8922  Why hasn't India (world's largest democracy) surpassed China yet?
    4
  7124.  @VonMoments  India is home to the largest number of enslaved people in the world at a little over 18 million people, at least 5x more than any other country. Source: India has 18 million modern slaves—at least five times more than any other country in the world qz.com/india/695565/india-has-18-million-modern-slaves-at-least-five-times-more-than-any-other-country-in-the-world/
    4
  7125. I believe Russia too will find away to bounce back from the enormous sanctions being leveled against it by the West. In fact, the Russian ruble has pretty much recovered to its pre-Ukraine crisis levels after a steep nosedive..
    4
  7126.  @humbug175  Yet the West Bank is being bombed despite having no HAMAS there.
    4
  7127. The Great Wall of China is not just a big wall. It's a representation of China's long and continuous history. It was built by the First Emperor of China, Qin Shi Huang back in 220 BC. Later on, many successive dynasties added on to the Great Wall until it stretches for over 20,000 km over varied landscape, long and sinuous like a Chinese Dragon 🐉. For centuries the Great Wall has protected China's northern border. It's no wonder why the majority voted for the Great Wall of China.
    4
  7128.  @johnheaton5058  China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia eventually succumbed to history. Throughout its long history, China has witnessed the birth and death of numerous nations, the rise and fall of various empires, and survived the passage of history to modern times while largely intact. China has even made it into space, landing lunar rovers on the Moon, and launching space stations into orbit. China is both an ancient civilization, as well as modern space-exploring nation.
    4
  7129. @KH Lee President Xi Jinping has shown to be strong and competent in leading the country to success, so in my opinion there's nothing wrong with leaving him in power to maximise the benefits to China. China is reviving the Mandate of Heaven in which competent leaders are allowed to remain in power, whereas incompetent leaders will be overthrown by the ordinary people.
    4
  7130. William Yao  said "US economic growth is driven by private sector" Exactly! That's why Americans often complain that the corporations control the US government for profit, oil, weapons and so on! Whereas in China, most of the corporations are state-controlled, so the government controls the corporations for China's benefit.
    4
  7131.  @tennis5126  Why do you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Everybody has heard of Chinese tourists visiting their lands, spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with international exchange students from China, studying the same topics as them and competing in exams and for university places (and for job offers when they graduate) Chinese companies like Huawei, Lenovo, Xiaomi, Oppo, ZTE, etc are expanding overseas, and Chinese investors are buying up property and real estate in your countries. So why do you still think Chinese people aren't "free"? Chinese people can be found virtually everywhere in the world today, since we make up a fifth of the world's population after all. Don't you have Chinese people living around your neighborhood, which ever country you are from?
    4
  7132.  @neil6958  About Innovation, China publishes more research papers than any other in the world, over a wide range of topics such as physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences. Countries by published scientific papers in 2016: 1. China (426,165 articles) 2. United States (408,985 articles) 3. India (110,320 articles) 4. Germany (103,122 articles) 5. United Kingdom (97,527 articles) ... Source: List of countries by number of scientific and technical journal articles wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_scientific_and_technical_journal_articles This shows that many Chinese scientist and researchers are making discoveries and publishing their findings, contributing to mankind's scientific advancements.
    4
  7133.  @stopwarstop7334  If you go and look at Taiwan's constitution, it states that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Since Taiwan recognizes that it's part of China, then what's wrong when Chinese jets fly in the Taiwan Straits? In International airspace no less...
    4
  7134.  @stopwarstop7334  You said: "What is that nine dash line that China put in the South China Sea." but it was Republic of China 🇹🇼 that published the 11-Dash Line in 1947 (which the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 later removed two dashes to become the 9-Dash Line) even today, Taiwan continues to claim the 11 Dash Line after ROC retreated to the island. So if you're calling Chinese barbarians for "putting a chair in the middle of the road" that means you are against Taiwan's 11-Dash Line as well.
    4
  7135.  @ivanlouche5421  You really believe those two guys from Kashgar are "at risk" in this video? Then why did VICE News not censor their faces and voices, like they did for that mysterious unnamed Uighur interview on board the train?
    4
  7136. Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, back when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors did a similar thing with Tibet during the Qing Dynasty. Tibet broke free of China in 1912 but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951, so why should China give up our ancestral territory?
    4
  7137.  @namelesssnitchy  I've met many anti-China people who always use the same old excuse of "I'm not anti-China, I'm just anti-CPC" to defend themselves and justify their anti-China stance. But the truth is that they don't care about China's interests, nor do they actually want to see China succeed that's all, but they pretend they aren't anti-China.
    4
  7138.  @mykrt8541  I often encountered those sort of anti-China people who always use the same old excuse of "I'm not anti-China, I'm just anti-CPC." to defend themselves and justify their anti-China stance. But the truth is that they don't care about China's interests, nor do they actually want to see China succeed that's all.
    4
  7139.  George Haskas  China is home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight and Tianhe-2 and in the 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source: China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion). This means Chinese researchers have access to some of the world's most advanced facilities to conduct their research.
    4
  7140.  George Haskas  Chinese scientists have also built quantum computing machine that is 24,000 times faster than its international counterparts and 10-100 times faster than the first electronic computer, ENIAC. Source: World's First Quantum Computer Made By China - 24,000 Times Faster Than International Counterparts fossbytes.com/worlds-first-quantum-computer-made-by-china/ The quantum computer is built by a team of Chinese scientists working at the University of Science and Technology of China, at Hefei in Anhui province. The researchers believe that quantum computing could excel the processing power of supercomputers. Pan Jianwei, a quantum physicist, and an academician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said that quantum computing makes use of quantum superposition principle for ultra-fast parallel calculation and simulation capabilities.
    4
  7141.  @DEATH-THE-GOAT  The US aimed for a conflict in the Taiwan strait, yet they got one in Ukraine with Russia. With the Ukraine offensive going nowhere, perhaps the US is seeking an off-ramp from the Ukraine conflict, and this Palestine-Israel conflict might just provide the distraction.
    4
  7142. It's no secret that the U.S is in decline and China is rising. Since the 19th century, many have grown accustomed to Western dominance, such that the thought of China surpassing the USA someday in the foreseeable future is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    4
  7143.  @MarkYeung1  Have you actually visited that so-called Chinese secret police station? Most likely they are centres run by local volunteers, not Chinese police officers, that aim to help Chinese citizens renew travel documents and other such services.
    4
  7144.  @nemo6282  "神州 Shenzhou your confusing the rise and fall of those empires,, with China existing for 5K years" Could you elaborate? Ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia have since succumbed to history, whereas China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest continuous civilization still alive today.
    4
  7145.  @stunningandbrave2520  I guess you have nothing productive to say, so you just spam emojis?
    4
  7146.  @tigading2177  Indeed. It's similar to how Russia has given up on trying to explain themselves to Western propaganda, who will only frame the Russo-Ukraine conflict one sided, and Russophobia is discriminating against Russian musicians, composers, conductors, dancers, chess players and athletes.
    4
  7147. "Politics is war without bloodshed, war is politics with bloodshed." (政治是不流血的战争，战争是流血的政治) - Mao Zedong
    4
  7148.  Jim Kirk  You just because some Hong Kong teenagers and young adults booed Chinese national anthem, makes the entire people of Hong Kong hate the mainland? These young people haven't start work yet, apply for apartment and settle down with family, so how do they represent the whole of Hong Kong? Look at the working adults in Hong Kong, who have mouths to feed, families to raise and they are the ones who know Hong Kong needs the mainland. As for North Korean asylum seekers, China is allies with North Korea, so of course we turn over North Korean asylum seekers apprehended in China to North Korea as a gesture of goodwill between our nations. I mean, why damage our China-North Korean relations over the life of an individual, you tell me?
    4
  7149. Meanwhile, mainland China is growing. Look at prosperous Shenzhen in the mainland, just across from Hong Kong and Shenzhen’s economic growth surpassed Hong Kong's in 2017. Source: Shenzhen surpasses US$338 billion GDP mark in 2017, beats Hong Kong and Singapore’s growth scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2128310/shenzhen-88-cent-hi-tech-growth-roll-hit-y2tr-2017 Shenzhen is roughly the same economic size as Singapore and Hong Kong, but recorded nominal output of 2.2 trillion yuan (US$338 billion) in 2017 thanks to its booming hi-tech sector. Over 40% of the output came from “innovative” businesses such as internet, biotech and telecom. And that's despite Shenzhen being under communist party rule, while Hong Kong is suffering under its own democratic government.
    4
  7150.  @DZ477  The Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth and receiving a proper Chinese education. They learn Mandarin Chinese, Chinese history and singing patriotic songs about their homeland, China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth and they learn English at school, American history and sing patriotic songs about their homeland, America.
    4
  7151. Mainland China today is world's 2nd largest economy whereas Hong Kong's economy is ranked 34th in the world. What happened to all of Hong Kong's prosperity while under British colonial rule?
    4
  7152.  @tingli3403  Hong Kong had been under authoritarian British colonial rule from 1841-1997, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote for their favorite leaders, under the One-Country, Two-Systems policy. So shouldn't the Hong Kong people be grateful to mainland China that they can cast votes today, when they couldn't before?
    4
  7153.  @ankurantil6137  "last time Zorawar Singh of Dogra Empire brought Lake Mansarovar and mount Kailash under his rule" Before that, Mount Kailash and Lake Mansarovar were already a part of Tibet (which was under the protectorate of Qing Dynasty China). The Dogra Empire encroached upon Tibetan territory and invaded it, but were repelled by Tibetan forces until a peace treaty to maintain the status quo was signed.
    4
  7154.  @ankurantil6137  Xinijang was part of China since Han Dynasty (200~ BC) and it was known as Xiyu (西域). The name East Turkestan was coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists (including Nikita Bichurin) who intended the name to replace the common Western term for the region, Chinese Turkestan. So it's just a rename of what is historically considered Chinese territory.
    4
  7155.  @ankurantil6137  "India is Bharat, Bharat is India" "Ancient Bharat" was not a country, it's rather a philosophy or an idea. And it's definition depends on people to people. I mean, are you claiming Nepal is part of India since you claim it was part of Bharat Varsha? "Dogra empire (one of India's princely states during British rule) in 1861 merged Mount Kailash and Mansarover lake in India." So you're claiming that Dogra empire wasn't part of India, and that it only became one of India's princely states during British rule? Then how is Mount Kailash and Mansarova part of India when in reality, it's part of Tibet?
    4
  7156. Glad to hear from you. I've know of another Chinese Canadian that came from Hong Kong to Canada, and he still has the "colonial mentality" (because Hong Kong was previously a British colony) that makes him think the West is always superior, instead of objectively evaluating the reality. Even though Britain has physically decolonized from Hong Kong, the "decolonization of the mind" still needs to happen for some people in Hong Kong.
    4
  7157. @Guppy's Gaming Channel China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled.
    4
  7158.  @larrygaroth9773  At least President Xi Jinping is willing to tackle the mountain of corruption present in the communist party. When's the last time USA had an corruption crackdown of its own? In my opinion, Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his presidential campaign. But after he became president, no further action being taken against Clinton.
    4
  7159. Henry Kissinger has been responsible for some of the worst and most hideous atrocities in the history of the world. Video: Henry Kissinger is a WAR CRIMINAL | Renegade Cut youtu.be/EH82rDxQ3dA
    4
  7160.  @ergysbardhi  You said: "The US want to weak china with any possible way and thats not easy at all. This is a smart politic decision!" It's no secret that the U.S is in decline and China is rising. If China can overtake the United States someday in the foreseeable future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this eventual goal, while the U.S secede their hegemonic goal? You said: "It's "ok" to be poor when you"enemy" is much poorer." That's the difference between the American and Chinese mindset. China believes in attaining win-win cooperation, while the U.S sees everything as a zero sum game.
    4
  7161.  @ianbelanger7459  If those foreign companies want to do business in China and set up shop here, then they should obey Chinese laws while in China. If they disagree with China's laws, then they are always welcome to pack their bags and take their business elsewhere. And who says that all companies in China are state-owned? Huawei for example, is 100% employee owned. (And this doesn't change the fact that USA is the most protectionist country in the world, according to Global Trade Alert)
    4
  7162.  @ianbelanger7459  Could you elaborate how is it a poor indication of the percentage of the economy covered by protectionist measures? Global Trade Alert found that USA filed over 800 protectionist measures since 2008, and of course these protectionist measures impact their economy. Whereas China's is only in the range of 200-300 so how can China be more protectionist than the US when we have taken far less measures?
    4
  7163. Musk is the lion tamer.
    4
  7164. Who said U.S President Nixon brought China out of isolation? After Mao Zedong and the communists expelled foreign imperialism from our lands, no number of American presidents could forcefully open China up, unless we ourselves are willing, it was actually Deng Xiaoping who brought China out of isolation, not the US President.
    4
  7165.  Charles Schmidd  Terminal Decline? Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    4
  7166.  @Arnsteel634  How is China in decline?
    4
  7167.  @seetheanimal5867  China is still pretty much intact, what are you talking about?
    4
  7168.  @georgeshibley9529  You were talking about "Singapore has no Me" and all I did was elaborate on Singapore's political situation that's all.
    4
  7169.  @vibemunster  India, Pakistan and Bangladesh were once part of British India, so aren't they clearly British colonies? And why India willingly gave up its own territory to allow Britain to partition its country into two sovereign countries? India even supported Bangladesh independence from East Pakistan, resulting in increased suspicion from Pakistan and also the creation of another independence country, Bangladesh. Each division only weakens the once powerful unified country, and India and Pakistan have been fighting each other for decades, and all the while the British are secretly laughing at what they done to the once unified British India. That's why China fight desperately to hold on to our territories in Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, etc, because we don't want to end up like India and Pakistan, brother states that oppose each other. And British colonies in Africa aren't doing well either, so again, how is this proof that Britain put Hong Kong and Singapore on the international level, when it failed to do the same to its other colonies?
    4
  7170.  @anthony94570  My bad, wrong date. But it shows that US Federal Reserve can just continue printing money without consequences, since the US Dollar is no longer backed by gold.
    4
  7171. The U.S wages so many wars since WWII, yet the United Nations never slapped sanctions on the U.S the likes of which Russia is being subjected to right now.
    4
  7172.  @skgsiddharthmithra4222  Many Indians (but not all of them) tend to have the colonial mentality. Colonial mentality is the internalized perception of ethnic and cultural inferiority as a result of colonization. They have an ingrained preference for Anglo Saxon culture over any "non-white" culture, including their own.
    4
  7173.  @alexhe926  Oh, Happy 14th Birthday to you. The world has gotten bigger for young people like you. Yet at the same time, the world is getting smaller as countries become more interconnected.
    4
  7174.  @MarkYeung1  It's sad to see changes, but clearly Hong Kong was going nowhere with their political system, and its possible that continuing down on the same path would likely result in another eruption of riots and protest in Hong Kong down the road. Inequality is huge, Hong Kong is home to the crazy rich and the mega poor. Land in Hong Kong are controlled by the property tycoons, and many young couples in Hong Kong face difficulty in applying for an apartment, so their solution is to leave. Video: How Hong Kong is home to the crazy rich and the mega poor youtu.be/EUHDAfD0Z-Q
    4
  7175.  @MarkYeung1  I have read on SCMP that Hong Kong actually has enough land for development, housing, and so on. The problem is that the land supply in Hong Kong is being controlled (presumably by the Hong Kong "property tycoons") in order to artificially drive up property prices in a densely populated market. Additionally, the Hong Kong government is powerless against the property tycoons, because much of the government revenue comes from the sale and taxation of land.
    4
  7176.  @Naikomi95  Nope, China's literacy rate is still very much the same. Perhaps you are the one dropping the US's?
    4
  7177.  @Darkademic  "it's strange that it chooses Marxism as its dominant political philosophy." Under its banner, Mao Zedong had succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying a divided China. Before that, China had been divided into various provinces, ruled by individual warlords under the Kuomintang administration. Therefore, I believe it's only natural that Marxism forms the basis of which the People's Republic of China is founded upon.
    4
  7178.  @samy_bouzaglo  Kashmir issue between India and Pakistan been ongoing for many years already without conclusion. The status quo isn't really going to change any time soon, should at least send the money to help the poor migrant workers.
    4
  7179. Why can't constitutions be changed or amended for the better? Do you want constitutions to remain static and stagnant forever? Look at USA and what changes have been made over the years? Americans civilians are still allowed to carry guns, resulting in mass school shootings every now and then, so why aren't stricter gun laws implemented instead?
    4
  7180.  @hhafty  This is how a typical school fence looks like in South East Asian countries and you can see the barbed wire on the top of the fence. Picture: tettafa.com/wp-content/uploads/photo-gallery/chain-link-fence/IMG_5695.jpg Schools are education centers for kids, and principals need to ensure the students have adequate security and many even have guards posted at school entrances.
    4
  7181.  @hhafty  I have given you evidence, but you offered nothing to support your point and even resorted to hurling vulgarities against me?
    4
  7182.  @ebolmao4129  China has the world's largest population, so you expect everyone to have access to internet? And what makes you think Chinese people don't have basic right to an opinion? You think the government can control all 1.4 billion people's minds just like that? And while not all Chinese tourists are good, I've seen some American tourists behave just as bad, so what's you point? Here is social experiment of how Americans treat Chinese in America, and how Chinese treat American in China. The Americans were mostly rude and obnoxious to the Chinese, while the Chinese were helpful and polite. Video: How American and Chinese Treat Foreigners Differently youtube.com/watch?v=04sTkhTRmWE
    4
  7183.  @ikhsanhasbi657  Chinese women were violated during Indonesian race riots and that had nothing to do with Suharto isn't that right?
    4
  7184.  @Burtocd  If you want to talk about political systems like democracy, then why do you think ordinary people should participate in political decisions that will affect the country's future? Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (e.g. they fail to turn up to vote) or they may base their decision on emotions instead of logic (e.g. Many British don't like immigrants so they voted Britain to leave the EU) or they may lack political awareness of the country's situation, or they may be easily influenced by foreign powers (Russian meddling in U.S elections) Why not let the people who know how to govern, govern?
    4
  7185.  @LancesArmorStriking  How do you know that the barbed wire was recently installed? Do you have evidence that the barbed wire did not existed before? And Muslims in Xinjiang are discouraged from having long unruly beards because it resembles the crescent-shaped beard of Islam. Xinjiang was first referred to as "Xiyu" (Chinese: 西域) under the Han dynasty, which drove the Xiongnu out of the Tarim Basin in 60 BCE (Han–Xiongnu War) in an effort to build and secure the profitable Silk Road. Xinjiang was part of China long before Jesus Christ himself was born. Only later did the Islamic invaders conquered the region and Islamize the region. So why can't China sinicize the Uighurs then? Xinjiang is part of the People's Republic of China today isn't it? About Uighur language, those Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens so what's wrong with teaching them Mandarin Chinese, Chinese history and singing patriotic songs about China? This will expand their job opportunities in China since Mandarin is the language of business in China.
    4
  7186.  @starrynight5207  It's because U.S immigration laws are too weak, and Muslims are under little pressure to assimilate into American culture. Refugees are fleeing their own conflict-ridden Islamic homelands and flooding the West, and many aren't adapting to their predominantly Christian host country. See how this American react to building of mosque in Spotsylvania County, Virginia. youtube.com/watch?v=INy4gaUrCL4
    4
  7187.  @Lu5ck  The minority ethnic groups in China like Uighurs, Tibetans, Manchu, Mongolians, etc, enjoy special privileges like not being subject to One-Child Policy and they can have as many kids as they want. They enjoy tax exemptions, education bursaries and priority in healthcare and education. For example, if Han Chinese need 600 points to qualify for a university course, then ethnic minority need only 400 points (easier to qualify) for the same university course.
    4
  7188.  @Rogsterius  I have provided sources to support my argument as well as use logic to explain my argument. Whereas most of my opponents like you resort to hurling personal insults against me, instead of attacking my points.
    4
  7189. ​ @VeryProPlayerYesSir1122  Who says YouTube is banned in China? Which person in China has been arrested for accessing YouTube while in China?
    4
  7190.  @allgoo1964  Hong Kong and mainland China are not at "war" and while the PLA is garrisoned at Hong Kong, it has not been activated thus far. As for China's borders China has settled boundary dispute approximately of 20,000 km with 12 countries out of the 22,000 km and is yet to settle about 2,000 km of boundary involving India and Bhutan. -In 1961, Nepal and China signed border agreement. -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1991, USSR and China signed Sino-Soviet border agreement. -In 1992, Laos and China signed border agreement. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border agreement. -In 2011, Tajikistan ratified 1999 deal with China and signed border agreement. For your China claiming 23 countries territories, Singapore doesn't even claim the South China Seas, so why is it counted among the 23 countries you tell me? Your source is clearly biased and you didn't bother to properly verify all those countries.
    4
  7191. About the barbed wire, it is meant to protect our kindergarteners from possible trespassers and kidnappers who might attempt to harm the kids or the staff. Just take a look at the recent chemical attack at a kindergarten in Yunnan, China, injuring 51 children and staff. More than 50 people, mostly children, were injured by a man who broke into a kindergarten in southwest China and sprayed them with corrosive liquid, local authorities said Tuesday (Nov 12). Source: 51 children injured in chemical attack at China kindergarten channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/china-kindergarten-chemical-attack-kaiyuan-city-yunnan-12086288 The suspect, a 23-year-old surnamed Kong, entered the kindergarten by climbing a wall before spraying victims with sodium hydroxide, said local authorities in Kaiyuan city, Yunnan province. Therefore, barbed wire is an additional form of protection for the kids to stop illegal trespassers and kidnappers from harming the kids and staff.
    4
  7192.  @knowitall5913  Cyrus is right. In China, it's difficult for politicians to enter government, but once in power, it's easy to enact changes. In USA, it's easy for politicians to enter government, but once in power, it's difficult to enact changes.
    4
  7193.  Charles Schmidd  Simply put Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou on earliest possible flight back to China, and China may consider releasing the two Canadians
    4
  7194.  Charles Schmidd  You're correct that Canada's hostage diplomacy doesn't work in the real world, so Canada should end this stalemate that they started, by putting Meng Wanzhou on the first flight back to China. Such a simple solution to end this mess that they started.
    4
  7195.  Charles Schmidd  A Chinese citizen, Meng Wanzhou was arrested in Canada (even though Meng did not break any Canadian laws while in Canada) yet you want to complain about foreigners setting foot in China? Look at rise in racially-motivated attacks against Asians in the West (such as the tragic Atlanta shooting of 8 people, 6 of whom were Asian women) and you want to complain about foreigners visiting China?
    4
  7196.  Charles Schmidd  I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    4
  7197.  @birsiir8251  Who said that Winnie the Pooh is forbidden in China? If you key in a search entry for Winnie the Pooh (小熊维尼) on Taobao (Chinese online shopping website) there are Winnie the Pooh products available for purchase in China.
    4
  7198.  @lethallizard963  It wasn't by choice, the Islamic invaders forced natives to convert to Islam or die by the sword. Islamic lore preaches death to non-believers, raping of their women and if non-Muslim marries a Muslim, they have to convert to Islam. What makes you think you know what is happening in Xinjiang? Do you know about the 1992 Urumqi bombings, the 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings, the 2010 Aksu bombing, the 2011 Hotan attack, 2011 Kashgar attacks and the 2014 Ürümqi attack, that were perpetrated by radical Uighurs in Xinjiang? Thanks to this program by the government, Xinjiang has been safe from Islamic terrorist attacks since then.
    4
  7199. Japanese automakers also copied from Western car companies. the 1917 Mitsubishi Model A was based on the Fiat A3-3 design. In the 1930s, Nissan Motors' cars were based on the Austin 7 and Graham-Paige designs, while the Toyota AA model was based on the Chrysler Airflow. Ohta built cars in the 1930s based on Ford models, while Chiyoda built a car resembling a 1935 Pontiac, and Sumida built a car similar to a LaSalle. But look at Japan now and its well known for its cars, so in the same why, China is also improving with international brands like Huawei, Tencent, Alibaba, etc.
    4
  7200.  @pcstar123  Yeah. Notice how the BBC hostess did not interrupt the other speaker quite as often as she did for Prof. Sachs, because the other speaker's words suited her anti-China narrative?
    4
  7201.  @jacwi8719  What has liking the comment even got to do with wumao or wolf warriors?
    4
  7202.  @elenaschwartz68  You're welcome
    4
  7203.  @justauser6078  I've noticed that sometimes the number of replies a comment has, doesn't match up with the number of comments being displayed when you click more replies. Looks like censorship exists even on a Western social media platform like YouTube.
    4
  7204.  @NathanaelHowland  9 years from when to when? In the 1980s perhaps? China has changed a lot, perhaps after you left China and according to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty from 1981 to 2015.
    4
  7205.    America is the world's most protectionist country. According to Global Trade Alert, since 2008, the US has taken over 800 of such protectionist measures, European countries like Britain, France, Germany, etc, have taken over 300 protectionist measures whereas China has only 200-300. Source: Wikipedia: Protectionism
    4
  7206.  @KarMengChow  "神州 Shenzhou too bad there is a saying once a slave, always a stooge." Mental chains are much harder to break than physical chains.
    4
  7207.  Conan  These are farmers in China who grow rice and raise fishes in the same fields. Video: China: Growing rice, raising fish for food and livelihood security youtu.be/ejP1VflTZ4A The fishes find insects and pests to eat among the rice plants. The rice benefits from fish manure acting as fertiliser and farmers get *two products*v from the same piece of land.
    4
  7208.  @heartcharlie7713  Lettuce production by country in 2017 1. China (15.2 million tonnes) 2. United States (3.8 million tonnes) 3. India (1.1 million tonnes) 4. Spain (1.0 million tonnes) 5. Italy (0.7 million tonnes) ... Source: Lettuce Production wikipedia.org/wiki/Lettuce#Production Countries by egg production in 2018 1. China (458 billion) 2. United States (109 billion) 3. India (95 billion) 4. Mexico (57.4 billion) 5. Brazil (53 billion) 6. Russia (44 billion) 7. Japan (43.8 billion) 8. Indonesia (38 billion) 9. Turkey (19.6 billion) Source: Egg production: leading countries worldwide 2018 statista.com/statistics/263971/top-10-countries-worldwide-in-egg-production/ Walnut production by country in 2017 1. China (1.92 million tonnes) 2. United States (0.57 million tonnes) 3. Iran (0.35 million tonnes) 4. Turkey (0.21 million tonnes) 5. Mexico (0.15 million tonnes) 6. Ukraine (0.11 million tonnes) ... Source: Walnut Production wikipedia.org/wiki/Walnut#Production
    4
  7209. In the past, Chinese tourists from Taiwan also had a bad reputation before learning to be civil. Even Hong Kong tourists also had bad reputation too. Now mainland China is going through a similar phase as well. Also, my point is that Taiwan government has been in power for most of its lifetime, right up to 2016 (2 years ago from today in 2018), when another political party took over the KMT, so Taiwan actually flourished under authoritarian single-party rule, not under democracy. After the DPP took over KMT, now Taiwan's economy is is a slump instead.
    4
  7210.  @CYT919  No, but I think the Western country's athletes care, because they'll be losing out on potential medals if their country continually boycotts Olympic events in China.
    4
  7211.  @tonyg6830  Is there something wrong with living under the CPC? The fact is that 1.4 billion people live under the CPC in mainland China compared to 23 million under the DPP in Taiwan island.
    4
  7212.  @item6931  China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilizations still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have succumbed to history. Chinese inventions like paper, compass and gunpowder have greatly influenced the world, so what do you think China was doing?
    4
  7213.  @billyehh  This is what Kishore Mahbubani wrote on his website: "America is the only major developed society where the average income of the bottom 50 percent has declined over a 30 year period from 1980 to 2010, as documented by my colleague of the National University of Singapore, Professor Danny Quah. By contrast, the bottom 50 percent of the Chinese population has seen the greatest improvements in their standard of living in recent decades." ... (Taken from Kishore Mahbubani website)
    4
  7214.  @jessicamichelle9847  Agreed. Germany leaving NATO could pave the way for the opening of Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline supplying Russian gas to Germany.
    4
  7215.  @beastmode8203  Even President Joe Biden himself has declared that U.S does not support Taiwan independence. The POTUS said that U.S policy towards China has not changed, in which the 1972 Shanghai Communique pledged that the U.S acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China and that the United States Government does not challenge that position.
    4
  7216.  @garam6555  You said: "you bloodthirsty atrocity apologists, may no gods have mercy upon your souls" China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, the USA appears to be a threat to global peace and stability here.
    4
  7217. -India is world's largest democracy, whereas China is "communist" -India has world's 2nd largest population, so its workforce is comparable to that of China's -Indians speak English (liked by the West) whereas even today many Chinese still struggle with English. -India has a free market, whereas China's market is still kinda closed off. -Republic of India was founded in 1947, whereas People's Republic of China was founded 2 years later. -India was founding member of World Trade Organization in 1995, whereas China joined late in 2001. -India has a better location, in between China and the West, both overland and maritime. India had all the above advantages whereas China held all the disadvantages, and yet China has long overtaken India in many areas. -China is world's 2nd largest economy, whereas India is the 7th. -China's literacy rate is 96.4% whereas India's literacy is 72.1% -China's Global Hunger Index is 7.5(low) whereas India's is 31.4(serious) -China's poverty rate is 2% whereas India's poverty rate is 12.4% -India has 5 times more people living in modern slavery than China. -China's expected lifespan is higher than that of India. -China is world's 3rd largest weapon exporter, whereas India is world's largest weapons importer. -China is 3rd country in the world to independently send people to space, and to launch space stations of our own, whereas India has no manned space missions nor space stations of its own.
    4
  7218.  @echelon2k8  As long as you use a government-approved VPN while in China, then nobody will come arrest you just for loging into YouTube while in China. Which person has been arrested just for doing so? And a VPN is a VPN, you can access YouTube, Wikipedia, Facebook, etc with a government-approved VPN, just as with a non-government approved one. I don't understand what difference between access to information are you talking about.
    4
  7219.  @joshlewis575  "I wanna see an unedited trip to Xinjiang whilst asking the hard questions." Daniel Dumbrill did exactly that on his channel.
    4
  7220.  @宋庆-i4m  But I gave an answer to your question that is logically correct, and it appears that you're behaving like a sore loser that's all. You choose to frame your question that way, then can't I choose to interpret it this way?
    4
  7221.  @宋庆-i4m  For the record though, I did eventually answer your question of whether you can get married to a person of the same sex in China, you'll just have to register your same-sex marriage in Taipei that's all. But you're just seemingly being a sore loser after I answered your question to the best of my ability.
    4
  7222.  @tsunamis82  "This lady claimed assault, disappeared for several days and only surfaced when other sporting bodies got involved." I read Peng Shuai's post (you can find the translated version on Reddit) and while she was emotional during her post and she has had a tumultuous on-and-off affair with a much older man, spanning several years in fact, but where are the allegations of sexual assault in her post? On 17 November, Peng Shuai wrote an email to WTA that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    4
  7223. China is currently at peace, and not at war with any country, since our last major war in 1979. But USA is involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, even in 21st century. China is helping build infrastructure less developed countries like Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Maldives, and African countries like Kenya, Nigeria, Angola, etc.
    4
  7224.  @solid1378  You have provided a source for Chinese Characters yes, but you didn't provide one for Sankrit to actually verify that it's been used since 2000 BCE. And who says that most of the Internet is blocked in China? Chinese is actually the world's 2nd most common Internet language according to the following source. Source: Top 10 Internet languages internetworldstats.com/stats7.htm Therefore there are actually plenty of Chinese websites in the Internet.
    4
  7225. Facebook is poison. In Chinese, the name Facebook sounds like Fēisǐ bùkě (非死不可) in Mandarin, which translates to "Must Die!" or "Have to Die!"
    4
  7226.  @seventrumpets6465  After watching those Double-O Seven: James Bond movies, he probably thinks the CIA are saving the world from evil dictators, each time USA intervenes in another country's political affairs.
    4
  7227. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    4
  7228.  @laser-tv2jq  If 50 cents can broker peace between countries, then isn't it a positive force for good in the world?
    4
  7229. The problem is that in the Marvel comics, Shangchi's father is Fu Manchu, a Yellow Peril caricature that was popular in America at that time. Also, while famous in the West, Simu Liu and Awkafina aren't familiar faces to many Chinese mainlanders. This actor Simu Liu also claims to be the first Asian hero ever and disregarding the other previous Chinese actors like Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Chow Yun Fatt, Tony Leung, Donnie Yen, and so on. Video:youtu.be/qomtBkjKOmI
    4
  7230.  @andrenogueira5058  Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    4
  7231.  @danpress7745  It clearly is. A brain drain occurs when talent migrate from a developing country to a developed country (i.e Chinese and Indians to the United States). A reverse brain drain is when talent migrates from a developed country to a developing country (i.e overseas Chinese in the West returning back to the homeland). Just look up articles on China's reverse brain drain to see what I mean.
    4
  7232.  @danpress7745  Firstly, I've glad that we have both at least, come to an understanding regarding the term "reverse brain drain" and what it means concerning China. Secondly, regarding your point about immigration in China, China is already home to the world's largest population (around 1.4 billion) so China has no real need for immigrants. Instead, China's immigration policy is very strict, allowing only the bare minimum number of immigrants into China, and no more than absolutely necessary. Because of this, China has no shortage of manpower, but perhaps we need more brainpower. Priority citizenship is granted to overseas Chinese seeking to return to the homeland, and also to foreigners that have something to contribute to China's development (i.e doctors, lawyers, engineers, scientists, researchers, businessmen, etc). Whereas other immigrants who are refugees, drunks, deadbeats, dissidents, drug addicts, etc have a lower priority in being granted citizenship in China. Other countries are welcome to pick up such people, but China is under no obligation to grant them citizenship.
    4
  7233.  @somaday2595  You said: "Saigon used to be called the Paris of the East/ Pearl of the Orient." That's part of the tourism campaign touted by the French seeking to attract traders and visitors to its colonies. By destroying traditional Vietnamese local temples, pagodas, monuments and buildings (some of which had stood for a millennium) and then erecting French architecture in its place, French colonists hoped to create the illusion of a "Paris of the East". The reality is that Saigon was colonized by the French, who were acquiring land, exploiting labour, exporting resources and making profit at the expense of local Vietnamese. Why'd you think the Vietnamese eventually wanted independence from France? You said: "If the French ruled Vietnam had been allowed to peacefully evolve into an independent democracy, maybe Vietnam would resemble Malaysia economically." It's the "colonial mentality" at work here. Why is it assumed that Vietnam's economic prosperity is somehow linked to whether it's a Western-style democracy or not? Countries can be undemocratic, yet economically prosperous (i.e Saudi Arabia). Likewise, countries can also be democratic, yet economically poor. (i.e many African democracies) Also, Malaysia's economy is ranked 34th in the world, while Vietnam's is ranked 39th, so the difference is almost marginal and not that significant in the big picture. But the difference in how each country attained their independence stands out. Malaysia is granted independence, whereas Vietnamese had to fight to earn their independence.
    4
  7234.  @yslee1401  How did she secretly building a 50m long tunnel on Canadian soil to the US consular? Without the use of a tunnel boring machine? Your conspiracy theories are getting wacky.
    4
  7235. ​ @GauravK-u6d What white man's religion? Christianity originated in the Middle East, where Jesus Christ himself was born. You claimed that you've stopped watching Western entertainment movies, but it's apparent that the effects of coloniality remain in your mind.
    4
  7236. @shyambajekal8084 You said: "In gatherings of World leaders you will see that only our Prime Minister is in our traditional attire whereas all the others, including yours (assuming you are Chinese) are in Western attire." You are wrong in this part. The leaders of Middle Eastern countries such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Iran and UAE do wear their own traditional Middle Eastern attire to these gatherings. Sometimes they also wear a suit and tie, but what's the point of comparing attire when it is the mindset that remains colonized? You said: "The most important thing is, our two countries should stop fighting among ourselves" So we need to look at the origin of the conflict. The border dispute between India and China is over the McMahon Line, drawn by British cartographer Henry McMahon, without regard for the existing historical borders between India and China and without consulting China. It's basically a line drawn by a foreigner to this land, and yet India still insists upon the McMahon Line as the border. It's because of the "colonial mentality" that India still clings to this line, subconsciously thinking that since it was drawn by the British, that it must be the real genuine border. Therefore, it matters not what attire our leaders choose to wear, but the minds of our leader that decides if coloniality remains.
    4
  7237. @truthreal3378 You said: "This is primarily due to China's expansionist approach... India has always aimed for good relations with China, but unfortunately, we’ve faced challenges due to inconsistent actions on China's part." Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai who proposed the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence (和平共处五项原则) in the 50s to build India-China relations and to settle the border dispute. But Indian PM Nehru did not want to talk, instead Nehru pursued an aggressive "Forward Policy" involving building military bases at the disputed border with China. Which country would tolerate such an aggressive policy towards settling border dispute? Under Nehru, India built 60 military bases at the border with China, including 43 bases that went beyond the McMahon Line and on actual Chinese territory as recognized by India.
    4
  7238. More people in Taiwan need to wake up to the fact that the U.S doesn't care about Taiwan, they just want to use the island as a chess piece to contain China's rise that's all. Taiwan is a pawn on the chessboard between world powers, but they don't have to be as long as they realize the U.S agenda in maintaining their global hegemony.
    4
  7239.  @patienceobongo  Well, why don't you tell all those non-Native Americans to get out of America and leave those lands to the Native Americans then? The indigenous peoples in Taiwan were descended from Austronesian farmers that arrived on the island from Mainland China in the Neolithic Age some 5000 years ago.
    4
  7240.  @blaisetzu  What makes you think China is incapable of creating new pop culture? The popular Tiktok culture of sharing short length videos originated in China. Today, Tiktok is one of the most downloaded app in the world and youths all over the world enjoy the short length format of the app.
    4
  7241. It's a combination of the “Red Scare” (fear of communism) and the “Yellow Peril” (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today.
    4
  7242. I've watched Cyrus' videos and his message is all about "Building Bridges, Not Walls" between the US and China. If US and China cooperate, then the whole world benefits, so isn't it a positive message for the world?
    4
  7243.  @Winters777  Philippines intentionally parked a rusty vessel (Sierra Madre) onto the Second Thomas Shoal in order to stake a claim to the shoal, how's that not shameless?
    4
  7244.  @Winters777  "Shenzhou. No country in the world supported your claim," According to The Diplomat: Who Wupports China in the South China Sea and Why the authors found at least 70 countries that have expressed support for China's stance on the South China Sea issue, compared with just 6-8 countries that support the Philippine's stance.
    4
  7245.  @Winters777  Now you're even resorting to hurling racial slurs (like tofu) against me just because I am Chinese and you're unable to refute my points.
    4
  7246.  @Winters777  In 1999, Philippine president Joseph Estrada promised that the ground vessel would be towed away. In 2014, the Chinese government asked the Philippines to remove the grounded ship. In 2017, China and the Philippines established a gentlemen's agreement that the status quo be maintained for the South China Sea, as both sides tried to strengthen their relations. Under the status quo agreement, no construction materials are allowed to fortify the Sierra Madre. Yet the Philippines has gone against this agreement and repeatedly brought in supply ships to reinforce the rusting hull of the grounded vessel.
    4
  7247.  @Winters777  According to article entitled: Duterte’s China ‘agreement’ on Ayungin prevented supply of construction material, says his spokesman (by Philippine Daily Inquirer, Jane Bautista) Under the status quo agreement, Philippine vessels may deliver “only water and food” to the BRP Sierra Madre, the grounded World War II-era warship. Thus, any attempt by the Philippines to bring in construction materials to fortify Sierra Madre would be in violation of the agreement. Former President Rodrigo Duterte accepted a “gentleman’s agreement” with Beijing regarding the nature of Manila’s resupply missions to its remote outpost in Ayungin (Second Thomas) Shoal in the West Philippine Sea, his former spokesperson Harry Roque.
    4
  7248.  @petersinclair3997  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    4
  7249. The Chinese government has not instituted any formal guidance or regulation barring the use of iPhones, addressing media reports, a Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson said. ... (Source: CNBC)
    4
  7250.  @michaelkatz275  What-aboutism much?
    4
  7251.  @marnixbrugmans4181  You said: "神州 Shenzhou to the second point of your statement, I happen to know what source you used for those 81%. It's a good source." What about my first point? You said that the majority of casualties were soldiers, then why can't you cite me the percentage of the 14 000 casualties that were soldiers?
    4
  7252.  @SwedeenXBL  You said: "Marnix Brugmans answered your questions perfectly" Marnix Brugmans can't even cite the percentage of the 14 000 casualties that he says were majority soldiers, how's that answering my question? All I did was ask him where he got his claim that that majority of the 14 000 casualties were soldiers that's all. Whereas I pointed out that according to UN figures, from 2018 to 2021, 81.4% of civilian casualties in the Donbas war came in rebel-held territory. You said: "And the fact you've ran around to most likely 10 different arguements this whole discussion continiously changing the topic or flat out lying about the BUK investigation" How did I change the topic? My main topic is that NATO is not a defensive organization, and has expanded into 15 countries right up to Russia's doorstep, but you insist NATO is a defensive organization (without explaining why) and claiming NATO isn't expanding.
    4
  7253.  @SwedeenXBL  You said: "Because the American HIMARs brigades actually doesn't fire the HIMARs systems located in Ukraine lol." HIMARS actually requires targeting coordinates provided by American satellites in order to function, so as a matter of fact, the US is responsible for the HIMARS in Ukraine being able to acquire targets. You said: "Because with your logic the USA isn't involved in Ukraine, right?" I never said that, and my previous point shows that the U.S is responsible for HIMARS in Ukraine being able to acquire targets. Also, I find it astonishing that you accuse me of changing the topic, when you yourself go on tangents all the time. You said: "The fact that the AA missile system BELONGED to the 53rd Brigade proves that Russia either transferred or lended the 53rd Brigades AA missile system to separtist groups in the Donbas" There's a possibility that the AA missile system was stolen from the 53rd Brigade. Again, even Ukraine Armed Forces also use Russian weapons, and if you trace back every Ukraine weapons it had belonged to Russian at one point in its life. Additionally, how does the investigation have access to the 53rd AA Brigade? Russia has not reported that a Buk of the 53rd Brigade was deployed in Eastern Ukraine and that this Buk downed flight MH17. In response, Russian President Vladimir Putin stated that Russia would analyse the JIT conclusion, but would acknowledge it only if it became party to the investigation. But the JIT refused to allow Russia to participate in the investigation.
    4
  7254. Such rational voices are in short supply these days.
    4
  7255.  @festekj  China's solar power plant makes use of molten salt to store heat energy. Molten salt is used because it can absorb and retain heat energy for a long period. Even after the Sun sets, the molten salt heated up throughout the day, can still produce electricity at night.
    4
  7256. @M E It's not racism, Chinese fear the virus, not other races. Before the epidemic, we have been treating foreigners well in China (just ask them). When Wuhan was under lockdown, there was some discrimination against Chinese from Wuhan (so it's not racism) and not against foreigners. Now that USA is the epicentre, Europe have high cases and some Nigerians tested positive for Covid-19, Chinese are suddenly racist against Africans and other foreigners?
    4
  7257.  @grandwonder5858  "What I’m talking about is Chinese-branded restaurants from China." Isn't there Haidilao in the United States?
    4
  7258.  @frankys8779  Killing own people? Chinese government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and halt production, implement lockdown, banning mass gatherings, closing tourist attractions, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and combat the coronavirus. Now it's finally paying off as China has the virus mostly under control and slow reopening our factories, our shops and tourist attractions. But in Western countries like US and UK, their economies are too precious to sacrifice, so human health has to be sacrificed instead. President Trump has consistently downplayed the virus and PM Johnson is relying on "herd immunity" to pull through.
    4
  7259. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiments in the West against Russia and China. And it's having the effect of pushing both Russia and China closer together than we've ever been.
    4
  7260.  @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane  Invade Taiwan? If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution, so how can China "invade" our own country? If anything, miltary conflict between Taiwan and the mainland would be a resumption of the unfinished Chinese Civil War that's all, not an invasion of another country. If US involves itself, then USA will be interfering in an internal civil war inside China.
    4
  7261.  @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane  Japan won't join in a hypothetical war between Taiwan and the mainland, because Japan is bound by WWII surrender treaty (Article 9 of the Japanese constitution) to never declare war against another country, except for in self-defence. Since Taiwan is not part of Japan, then Japan would be breaking it's constitution if they choose to go to war with China for anything other than self-defence. Australia is behaving like the "US deputy sheriff" of Asia. What benefit would it be for Australia to join in a hypothetical war between Taiwan and the mainland? Mainland China is Australia's biggest trading partner, but how is Taiwan of benefit to Australia? Australia is located closer to Asia than America, yet Australian politicians like Scott Morrison are fanning the flames of anti-China sentiment and following US's anti-China stance regarding China.
    4
  7262.  @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane  I already shown that legally, Japan can't join in any war (except for in self defence) and since Taiwan is not part of Japan, Japan is forbidden from intervening in a hypothetical military conflict between Taiwan and the mainland, under Article 9 of the Japanese constitution.
    4
  7263.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "are trying to install a NEW illegitimate Dali Llama" Because the 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and a traitor to his people. The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government (Beijing). Declassified CIA files have exposed that a total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) Source: CIA Tibetan program wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Costs So here we have concrete evidence that the 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the USA to engage in separatist activities against the Central People's Government. This is concrete evidence of the USA engaging in interference in Tibet through "poaching" the so-called spiritual leader, so China decided to have a new leader whom isn't swayed by foreign powers in their attempts to separate Tibet from China. You said: "and having taken your FALSE claims before an INTERNATIONAL court, have LOST and ruled against." Which international court? The International Court of Justice? What claims did China take to the ICJ?
    4
  7264. As China's economy grows, China's digital Renminbi is going to rise as well.
    4
  7265.  @skyeagle3123  So according to you, the coronavirus was spreading like wildfire in China, that's why China reported the mysterious pneumonia-like illness to World Health Organization on 31st Dec 2019. then why are you accusing China of keeping Covid a secret when they made available whatever information about Covid-19 to the rest of the world through the WHO, and through scientific publications such as The Lancet? Did you know that traces of Covid-19 had been found in Barcelona sewers in Spain since March 2019, nine months before the outbreak in Wuhan? Spanish virologists have found traces of the novel coronavirus in a sample of Barcelona waste water collected in March 2019, nine months before the COVID-19 disease was identified in China, the University of Barcelona said You said: "My big question is why and the world were they making a man made virus like this when it had nothing to do with humans in the frist place thats how the scienctist figure that it was man made." Where's your evidence that this coronavirus is man-made? Scientists from all over the world have since debunked the claim that Covid-19 is man-made. I mean, if you claim it's man-made then why would China even release this virus in Wuhan of all places? This would alert other countries of the existence of such a virus and also point the finger in China, so how does your conspiracy theory that the coronavirus is man-made hold water? You said: "China on the other hand could careless about there disgusting ways of life of humanity" If China really didn't care about humans, then why'd the government shut down all flights coming out of China? Why'd China built two 1000-bed temporary hospitals for patients and to save more lives? I heard that in New York, there was a shortage of hospital beds, so the doctors and nurses just erect tents in Central Park for patients, yet you're claiming the Communist Party of China doesn't care about humans? You said: "how does one ccp member own 20 trillion dollars thats right that's on one of them and if you took all there wealth together what they own would be unreal" Which communist party member owns 20 trillion dollars ($20,000,000,000,000)? The Communist Party of China has a membership of 90 million communist members, so if you multiple 20 trillion by 90 million, you'll get a figure that even the United State's economy can't match, so where did you get such an absurd figure of one communist member owning 20 trillion dollars? Let's look at the membership of the Communist Party of China. As of 30 Jun 2016, the CPC consists of: -Farmers, Herdsmen and Fishermen (26 million) -Workers (7.2 million) -Managers, professionals and technical staff in enterprises and public institutions (12.5 million) -Administrative Staff (9 million) -Party Cadres (7.4 million) ... So actually the CPC members are mostly common folk, whose the communist party member that owns $20 trillion dollars?
    4
  7266. Putin told Biden: "Don't be mad at the mirror if you are ugly."
    4
  7267.  @MarkYeung1  Who said that YouTube is banned in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for logging into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    4
  7268. +Gregor Jerman The Japanese Emperor does not participate in politics, and the Japanese pay tax to support Imperial family that does nothing. Japan is suffering from economic slump, low birth rate, and an aging population, but Japanese Imperial family don't tackle those problems. So what's the point of having them? I never said China has the oldest. But Ancient African writing systems (including Egyptian Hieroglyphs) are no longer commonly used today, and are considered dead languages (since its no longer being written by natives, and not "evolving" with the addition of new words its vocabulary) whereas Chinese Characters are still very much "alive" and new words are being created and added into the langauge every day. China contribute the world's largest outbound tourists and according to United Nations’ World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), China’s outbound tourists now accounts for 10% of the total of global tourists. Chinese tourists visit your countries and buy souvenirs, helping stimulate your local economies and that's why more and more countries are catering to Chinese tourists, offering guides in Mandarin Chinese, and so on. Chinese tourists have shown improved behaviors as well, and that we deserve being treated with hospitality and respect. Chinese tourists are the biggest contributors to world tourism Source: travelwireasia.com/2018/06/chinese-tourists-are-the-biggest-contributors-to-world-tourism/
    4
  7269.  @phlei95014  You said: "Japan economy started to blossom because of tte usa push, so was Germany." Japan's industrialization occurred much earlier. Imperial Japan first modernized during the Meji Restoration (明治維新) under the authoritarian rule of Emperor Meiji (of which the Meiji Era is named after). The Shogunate was abolished and imperial power was restored to the Japanese Emperor. The samurai-class were abolished, there's even a Hollywood firm starring Tom Cruise depicting the samurai's last stand against an increasingly modernizing Japanese army. Needless to say, Japan's modernization was under authoritarian imperial rule, but Japan had emerged as Asia's strongest economy and military at the start of WWII, which was why Imperial Japan was able to conquer much of Asia during WWII. Same goes for Germany at the start of WWII.
    4
  7270.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "A country with autocratic dictatorship doesn't equate to economic success." Not all of them, but as I've discussed with phlei9514, Taiwan island flourished under KMT authoritarian rule, South Korea under Park Chung-hee dictatorship, and Imperial Japan under Emperor Meiji. Likewise, mainland China's economic success is occurring under the leadership of the Communist Party of China.
    4
  7271.  @KrunoslavStifter  Chairman Mao is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    4
  7272.  @flickingbollocks5542  You said: "It does not fit the description of Democracy that you said China is." There are multiple ways to define democracy, perhaps the most common definition is a government of the people, by the people, for the people. By this definition, the United States is not a democracy, it's a plutocracy with a government of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%. Because the U.S government is unable to deliver what the Americans truly want. Whereas in China, a Harvard survey has shown that around 80%-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China, so China is more democratic because the government is carrying out the will of the people.
    4
  7273.  @KrunoslavStifter  There were many factors leading to the Great Chinese Famine, one of which is poor weather conditions like floods and droughts, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvests and mass starvation. I mean, even Mao Zedong himself couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. There's also the fact that during the time of the Great Famine, the United States intentionally slapped embargo on food, medicine, fertilizers entering China, which further exacerbated the famine and lead to more deaths.
    4
  7274.  @hannibalwantsahuggrande3433  You said: "I appreciate the goodwill although I am never going to have a positive view on *any government the calls itself communist.*" Let's use Russia as an example. Before 1917, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe at that time, dominated by peasants, whose traditional household economies were extremely inefficient compared to agriculture in Western Europe or the United States. Only about 15% of the population lived in towns, and fewer than 10% worked in industry. Russia was also technological backward during this period, lagging far behind advanced capitalist countries like Great Britain and Germany. But after the 1917 Communist Revolution by the Bolsheviks, Russia rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe during its heyday as the Soviet Union, both economically (i.e Soviet Union was also the world's 2nd largest economy from 1960 to 1985) as well as militarily (that's why NATO was formed in response to Soviet Union's military might). The Soviet Union also made numerous advances in technology during its time. Such an ideology that transformed what was once arguably Europe's poorest country into its strongest as the Soviet Union, and you're just dismissing communist ideology just like that? Is it because Western propaganda has filled your mind with anti-communist sentiment?
    4
  7275.  @flickingbollocks5542  What is your assertion then? What's your definition of a democracy, since there are multiple definitions? Is when a government is carrying out the people's will? If that's your definition, then Chinese government is actually carrying out the will of the people and is able to deliver results for many in China, whereas you can't say the same for the United States for example.
    4
  7276. According to polls, 70% of American correspondents are in favor of banning Russian oil, even if it means higher gas prices. The conditioning of Americans to accept inflation as it is is truly insane.
    4
  7277. Look at what happened to journalist in Muslim country like Saudi Arabia. The Crown Prince can murder a journalist named Khashoggi and even U.S President Trump stands with Saudi Arabia and claim that murdered journalist was ‘enemy of the state’ Source: Trump 'stands with' Saudi Arabia and defends crown prince over Khashoggi .theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/20/trump-saudi-arabia-jamal-khashoggi-crown-prince
    4
  7278.  @greentea8852  The Soviet Union suffered the most casualties of WWII, yet studies also show that the Soviet Union inflicted the most damage onto Germany during WWII.
    4
  7279.  @quekjoseph836  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    4
  7280.  Beast Mode  Many Americans are frankly tired of war and they're more concerned with problems back home like inflation, rising gas prices, rising healthcare costs, Black Lives Matter, and other domestic issues, why'd would they want to go to war with China? That would spell the end of affordable Made-in-China goods helping to offset the cost of living in the USA, so why would Americans want that?
    4
  7281. Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    4
  7282.  @inkbold8511  Hmm, does this link:youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA show up on your screen? It's a 3-min video of Ürümqi, Xinjiang's capital in China showcasing its development.
    4
  7283. American philosophy: You will succeed by undermining your competitors, not by employing your own talents.
    4
  7284. Binkov is giving India some face here.
    4
  7285.  @MarkYeung1  1) Because if they did, they would realized that the Hong Kong Extradition Bill would only allow extradition of criminals to mainland China, if the crime was considered illegal in both Hong Kong and the mainland. That means Hong Kong court's jurisdiction over the extradition is preserved. But even after Carrie Lam scrapped the Hong Kong extradition bill, some people in Hong Kong still continued protesting after the bill was scrapped. 2) What happened Hong Kong in 2019 outside of those dates you described? It's like you're just cherry-picking two dates when Hong Kong was rocked by violent riots on numerous other dates.
    4
  7286.  @MarkYeung1  The extradition bill was GOOD for both Hong Kong and mainland China. Because criminals (like that Hong Konger who strangled his girlfriend in Taiwan before fleeing back to Hong Kong to escape extradition) can finally face his crime, and the victim's family members can finally have justice. How is this not good for Hong Kong and for mainland China? Are you saying that you want to see such criminals escape justice, and for Hong Kong to become home to such fugitives? "HongKongers are generally apolitical." And that's why many Hong Kong protesters didn't read the extradition bill when it's a good thing for them. Since you're from Hong Kong yourself, could you explain how is the bill not acceptable for Hong Kong?
    4
  7287.  @MarkYeung1  Even though organizers of the protests claimed that there were over a million protestors on 9th June and nearly two million protestors on 16th June, the Hong Kong Police estimated only 240,000 protestors on 9th June and 338,000 protestors on 16th June. This figure is a far cry from the supposed "millions of protestors" claimed by the organizers.
    4
  7288.  @ColoniaMurder20  Records for the southern state of Yue begin with the reign of King Yunchang (d. 497 BC). According to the Records of the Grand Historian 《史记》 the Yue kings were descended from sixth king of the Xia dynasty, named Shao Kang (少康). According to another source, the kings of Yue were related to the royal family of Chu. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Baiyue: History: Wu and Yue)
    4
  7289. It's the Hong Kong Police that are protecting the people of Hong Kong from the rioters. Not God.
    4
  7290. Agreed. Ukraine has been supporting ultra-nationalist, neo-Nazis like the Azov Battalion carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Luhansk (collectively known as Donbas). Over the course of 8 years, over 13,000 civilians have been killed in Donbas by shelling (on both sides). Russia is not starting a war, they're ending one that started in the 2014 coup d'etat of Ukrainian President Yanukovych by USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in place.
    4
  7291.  Beast Mode  It's apparent by now that despite all their talk and cheer-leading, NATO and USA aren't going to send troops to defend Ukraine. So what makes you think USA will send troops to defend Taiwan if conflict breaks out there?
    4
  7292. The "Yellow Peril" mindset never really died out. Since 19th century, Westerners have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-liberal democratic country like China eventually surpassing the West someday in the future, is simply too frightening for Westerners to fathom.
    4
  7293.  @sara.cbc92  China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    4
  7294.  @The-Crazy-Coonass  You said: "The Chinese government has a reputation of stealing intellectual property and have broken countless WTO rules." On the WTO website itself, China has around 50 complaints lodged against it, whereas the United States has 150 complaints lodged against it, so what broken WTO rules are you talking about?
    4
  7295.  @BrokeCanadian  Western propaganda also speculated that "North Korean leader Kim Jung-un is dead" but turns out that Kim is still very much alive, so what makes you think Jack Ma is dead?
    4
  7296.  @douglasman2011  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    4
  7297.  @joelturley4847  Why are you calling me a wumao? Did I mention anything about the Communist Party of China here in this thread?
    4
  7298.  @None-do2qn  China has built at least 35,000 mosques, more than France's 2,300, America's 2,106, and Great Britain's 1,600. Even on the per capital basis, Chinese Muslims still have more than triple the amount of mosques their Western peers have. Video: What's China's 're-education camp' in Xinjiang really about? youtu.be/U3YBomwuB10?t=80 So China literally has more mosques than most Western countries, what are you talking about?
    4
  7299.  @billyehh  If you dispute my 90% home ownership rate in China, then perhaps could you provide an alternative source as to what you believe is the true home ownership rate in China?
    4
  7300. There's even a Chinese joke that the name Facebook sounds like Fēisǐ bùkě (非死不可) in Mandarin, which translates to "Must Die!"
    4
  7301. Casper Cito Chinese women dating foreign men have nothing to do with made in China isn't it?
    4
  7302. Pompeo: Stop Xinjiang Genocide! China: We welcome Pompeo to visit Xinjiang to see for himself that there are no human rights violations. Pompeo: I decline!
    4
  7303.  @JamesRobertSmith  The KMT clearly fled to Taiwan island from the mainland, and they declared Taipei as the capital of the Republic of China.
    4
  7304.  @cheongwenpa  So Singapore's sanctions on Russia are effectively useless, then what's the point of doing them? As for "brownie point", what advantage does it confer onto Singapore that other South East Asian countries (who didn't apply sanctions) won't get to enjoy? As for repercussions, I've already pointed out that Singapore is put on Russia's list of "unfriendly countries" how can you claim there aren't any repercussions?
    4
  7305.  @cheongwenpa  "神州 Shenzhou the choice is between Russia calling Singapore unfriendly or EU/USA cutting their trade relationship with us." But no other South East Asian country has imposed sanctions on Russia, yet did the EU/USA cut off trade with Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, etc? Then what's the point of Singapore sanctioning Russia when other South East Asian countries hadn't, and didn't get their EU/USA trade relations cut off?
    4
  7306.  @rosalynnchow5057  Agreed. And by sanctioning Russia, Singapore has effectively given up its "neutral status" and earned a place on Russia's list of "unfriendly countries". There was literally no political gain for Singapore to have sanctioned Russia. They could have chosen not to do so, and left their options open.
    4
  7307.  @cheongwenpa  Who's talking about Australia? I'm pointing out that no other South East Asian country has imposed sanctions on Russia, yet did the EU/USA cut off trade with Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, etc? Then for what political reason did Singapore impose sanctions on Russia? Singapore has effectively given up its "neutral status" (if it had any) and made it onto Russia's list of "unfriendly countries" and for what political gain?
    4
  7308.  @rosalynnchow5057  Agreed. Singapore's founder LKY had a solid grasp of geopolitics and is gifted with foresight, it's a shame that Singapore hasn't produced a political successor of his caliber. I truly see no political gain for Singapore imposing sanctions on Russia. While it's true that some other ASEAN countries have voted against Russia, none took the additional step of imposing sanctions on Russia except for Singapore. It's baffling to me why they choose this move.
    4
  7309.  @MarkYeung1  Beijing has dropped the vaccine mandate for people entering crowded places after a strong online backlash from Chinese netizens, whereas Canadian truckers protesting vaccine mandates had their bank accounts frozen by the Canadian authorities.
    4
  7310. 敬酒不吃吃罚酒，是中方对于台湾问题的明确态度。
    4
  7311. No matter what she do, the HK protestors WILL ALWAYS be against her. Carrie Lam had announced the formal withdrawal of the extradition bill, yet the protestors still continue isn't it? Carrie Lam is open to dialogue but the protestors aren't, and don't want to talk. So no choice but for Carrie Lam to take more authoritarian approach here then.
    4
  7312. In order for America and China to get along, America has to accept the possibility of being surpassed in the world by a non-Western, non-liberal democratic country like China, and to accept the possibility of being in number 2 in the world. It happened in history, Britain was colonial superpower during 19th century, but was eventually overtaken by the United States during the 20th century. And many expects believe China is expected to surpass the United States in the 21st century.
    4
  7313. No other in the world truly cares more for Taiwan than mainland China. Certainly the US doesn't, they regard the island as a base to contain the mainland's rise. Mainlanders have been taught to regard the people of Taiwan as part of the same family, but its a shame that this feeling is not widely reciprocated by the people of Taiwan.
    4
  7314.  @edgeg400  I thought Westerners were all about freedom, then can't China set up Confucius Institutes in the West, promoting Chinese language and culture, supporting local Chinese teaching internationally, and facilitating cultural exchanges? And regarding fentanyl, Chinese court sentences 9 fentanyl traffickers to death youtu.be/CH4I4hAk6Y8
    4
  7315. Ukrainian ultra-nationalists and neo Nazis like the Azov Battalion shouldn't be killing ethnic Russians in Donbas region. Over 13,000 civilians have been killed in Donbas over the course of 8 years by shelling (by both sides) because of Ukraine's refusal to honor the Minsk agreement. Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that was set in motion since the 2014 coup d'etat of Ukraine President Yanukovych by the USA, and installing their own U.S puppet government into Ukraine.
    4
  7316.  @night6724  Chairman Mao did not butcher those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine, which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    4
  7317.  @jtf873  So have you spoken to Chinese mainlanders in your country then? Before 2019, China was the largest source of tourists, and everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands. Even in terms of international students, China is the largest source of international students, visiting Western schools and universities where they learn the same topics as their local peers.
    4
  7318. ​ @Andy-P  "Didn't the new Chinese ambassador to the U.S.A ( Qin Gang) lecture Americans that China is a real democracy and America isn't." Because America really isn't a democracy of the people, by the people, for the people, it has become a plutocracy of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%. Just look at how the crooks at Wallstreet, Hollywood, the oil companies, and the U.S Military-Industrial Complex control the U.S government, waging wars in the Middle East (to control the oil for example) at the expense of the ordinary American taxpayers, and the USA certainly isn't a democracy.
    4
  7319.  @Andy-P  You said: "America is a democracy, the politicians may come from certain backgrounds but anybody can potentially be President and everyone has the right to vote." That's incorrect. Not just any anybody can become president, you'll have to be rich in order to be a candidate for U.S presidency. Because U.S presidential campaigns cost an arm and a leg, only rich candidates can survive the U.S elections and that's how poor candidates get weeded out by the system and how the rich people and corporations retain control the U.S government. Whereas if you look at China, Xi Jinping was from a poor background. As a kid he was exiled to rural China, where he lived in a cave house dug into a hillside, where he cleaned toilets, fed pigs, did farming and so on. Yet fast forward till today and now Xi Jinping is the President of the People's Republic of China.
    4
  7320.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou that's exactly why they criticize democracy in the west." But CGTN never criticize democracy the ideology itself (show me a video of CGTN criticizing democratic ideology itself). CGTN merely pointed out that some of the so-called Western democracies no longer appear to be democracies. Instead of being a democracy of the people, by the people, for the people, these Western democracies have mutated into plutocracies of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%, that's all, and that some countries are even exporting war to other countries, under the veil of democracy, then that's not criticizing the ideology of democracy. You said: "Isn't it interference of other country's internal affairs?" China didn't invade the Western democracies and interfere with their internal affairs, all it did was point out that some of so-called Western democracies aren't actual democracies, but have become plutocracies. The sad thing is that there are some overseas Chinese that are stuck in a "colonial mindset" and blindly worships Western countries as "bastions of democracy" when this isn't necessarily the case in reality. Western democratic institutions are failing apart at the seams, but such overseas Chinese still think Western countries are "democratic" and somehow immune to criticism.
    4
  7321. China is developing medical exoskeletons to help paraplegics regain the use of their legs. Video: China-made exoskeleton robot gives hope to paraplegics youtu.be/3_o8nthlIIA
    4
  7322.  @markbenjamin1703  NATO was formed in response to rising Soviet military might, but after the USSR dissolved in 1990s, NATO no longer serves any interests, except perhaps the U.S interests in maintaining their global hegemony.
    4
  7323.  @intothewrx  Bruce Lee isn't around anymore, but have you tried asking Jackie Chan whether he considers himself Chinese and proud?
    4
  7324.  @richardgentry5589  According to Victor Davis Hanson (Fellow at the Hoover Institution) the US Military left behind an amount of military hardware equivalent to around 7 Gerald Ford U.S Aircraft Carriers (each worth around $12 billion, the most expensive aircraft carrier) in Afghanistan for the Taliban to seize. Video:_This is the greatest loss of military equipment in warfare history: Hanson_ youtu.be/t5xp25JK5CE
    4
  7325.  @hyc1266  The Taliban may not be trained in how to use this hardware and equipment, but they can learn from the now-disbanded Afghan Army soldiers previously trained by the US Army. Alternatively, it's also quite possible that Taliban would simply sell off these US hardware for quick cash (which Afghanistan urgently needs at the moment) to interested potential buyers like Russia and China. Or even other militant groups. Nevertheless, it represents preventable, unnecessary loss of a substantial amount of American taxpayers money, as well as the increased military budget and enriching the military industry you mentioned. Good point. I hope more Americans pursue questioning over what their tax money is being used for.
    4
  7326.  @ygus3030  I don't think a Biden win will somehow magically resolve the Meng Wanzhou issue. Who knows, a Biden administration might just continue to ban Huawei, Tik Tok, WeChat, given the growing anti-China sentiment in the USA.
    4
  7327.  @bens8013  If you truly cared for Russians, then you would be against the discrimination they are facing in the West. Russian culture is being denigrated in the West, and Russian musicians, ballet dancers, orchestra conductors, artists, chess players, tennis players, athletes, etc are facing discrimination for their political views in the West.
    4
  7328. +The Sparkle Zone You quoted Sun Zi saying 'If words of command are not clear and distinct, if orders are not thoroughly understood, the general is to blame.' Which Japanese general ordered the Japanese soldiers to rape Chinese women and butcher Chinese civilians? Since Japanese generals gave no such orders, then the Japanese soldiers chose to rape Chinese women of their own accord and free will isn't it? Which part of this logic is too hard for you to understand? It is clear that the Japanese soldiers committed such atrocities of their own violation, without any orders being issued from the Japanese generals. So why are you quoting Sun Zi's about general's orders not being understood?
    4
  7329.  @cchannel7857  serpentza has a history of lying to his audiences, for example, serpentza and c-milk claim that the Dune movie posters in China omitted black actress Sharon Ducan-Brewster, but this was easily debunked as people looked up movie posters in China.
    4
  7330.  @ernestolynch1926  "unemployment in Russia is growing, poverty is increasing, and common people are suffering." Didn't you watch 4:50 of Cyrus' video? Russia's unemployment halved from 6% in 2020 to 3% in 2023. As for poverty, Russia's poverty rate has declined since 2015 from over 13%, to 11% in 2023.
    4
  7331.  @Finnbearl61r  "Shenzhou. are you sure he’s not a dictator?" Putin recently announced his candidacy in the 2024 Russian Presidential election. What sort of dictator will do such a thing?
    4
  7332.  @Finnbearl61r  Russia had previous expressed interest in joining NATO to help protect European interests (Russia is a European country after all) yet why was Russia rejected? Yet the USA from across the Pacific Ocean is allowed to enter NATO? Also, Georgia started the war with Russia according to a EU-backed report.
    4
  7333.  @Finnbearl61r  How am I lying? Russia has returned about 400 children to Ukraine since the special military operation. These children were in a warzone so they were evacuated to safety and later returned to family members proper.
    4
  7334.  @bartonlee3594  "Shenzhou. Putin making Russia great?" Didn't you watch 4:50 of Cyrus' video? Russia's unemployment halved from 6% in 2020 to 3% in 2023.
    4
  7335.  @bartonlee3594  Too bad you can't say the same for Western leaders that were voted in through "democracy". In fact many in the West have rather low approvals of their leaders, while Russian President Putin and Chinese President Xi enjoy high approval from Russians and Chinese respectively, as studies have shown.
    4
  7336.  @shambhutekar5797  In the South China Sea, China has 12 geographical features whereas Vietnam occupies *21 islands on which it has built runways, piers, barracks, storage tanks, and gun emplacements. Malaysia and the Philippines have 5 and 9 sites respectively, occupied by naval detachments. All of them have airstrips capable of launching military aircraft so aren't they also militarizing the South China Sea islands?
    4
  7337.  @ColoniaMurder20  You got your timelines mixed up. The Austronesian expansion from South China happened around 3500 years ago (1500-1000 BCE). Han Dynasty existed from 220 BC onwards, so the BaiYue people in southern China are not the same as Indonesians, Malaysians and Filipinos. Additionally, Han Dynasty expansion was limited by land. Whereas the Austronesians expanded overseas, conquering Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines, and colonizing the indigenous people that lived in those regions.
    4
  7338.  @ColoniaMurder20  There are still indigenous people living in Southern China. The Miao (or Hmong) are the aboriginal people of China that live mainly in southern China in the provinces of Guizhou, Hunan, Yunnan, Sichuan, Guangxi and Hubei. Also Taiwanese aboriginals still exist in Taiwan island. They retain many of their cultural heritage, whereas the aborigine culture (i.e Non-Austronesia) in Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines is virtually not existent. And the fact remains that Austronesian expansion by sea is far more extensive than Han expansion which is limited by land.
    4
  7339. Singapore is actually the only South East Asian country to have slapped sanctions on Russia (thus earning Singapore a place on Russia's list of "unfriendly countries") so isn't Singapore's stance basically the same as the G7's stance towards Russia?
    4
  7340.  Charles Schmid  "神州 Shenzhou "Predatory" capitalism is killing the planet." This point I agree. Westerners been polluting the Earth since 200-300 years ago, back when the Industrial Revolution started in 1700-1800s. As for your second statement, what unending biological warfare program are you talking about?
    4
  7341.  @xerozero976  Here are some rich corrupt Chinese billionaires and CEOs arrested by the Communist Party of China: Zeng Chengjie - convicted of illegally fund raising 3.45 billion yuan, and defrauding 57,000 investors. Du Yimin - convicted of illegally raising 700 million yuan, promising investors high returns, buy instead using the money to buy cars, apartments and luxury goods for herself. Song Wendai - convicted of illegally obtaining company shares and embezzling 87 million yuan in public funds and assets, including gold and silver. Lin Haiyan - convicted of illegally raising 640 million yuan from investors, mostly friends, co-workers and family. Lu Yaping - convicted of embezzling 32 million yuan of public funds while she was working in Fushin City. …… This shows that in China, the corrupt CEOs and billionaires are punished if they are found to be corrupted, whereas in the USA, billionaires and CEOs commit fraud, corruption and can get away with it.
    4
  7342. China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. Source: Fishing Industry in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishing_industry_in_China China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_producing_countries_of_agricultural_commodities
    4
  7343. Words can mislead and incite riots, like Trump's tweets leading up to the January 6th Capitol Hill riots in Washington, until even Facebook, Instagram, Twitter banned Trump's social media accounts. Even though Trump is technically still the POTUS at that time. In China, the Chinese government controls the media, whereas in USA, the U.S social media can shut up the POTUS.
    4
  7344.  @islandbee  Every country copies from each other at some point in history and Western countries have also copied and stolen technology from each other. One of the greatest ripoffs of all time was the US theft of German patents after World War II. At the start of WWII, American tanks were largely inferior to German Tanks, but after Nazi surrender, the Americans absorbed German Panzer (Tank) technology and that's why American tanks are so powerful today. The German Airforce (Luftwaffe) had such successful aircraft designs that Americans copied them and incorporated them into their own airforce. Even German Nazi V2 Rocket Scientists were put to work on NASA's Moon landing missions. Source: The Great Patents Heist wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/patents.html Like I said previously, Chinese restaurants are primarily designed to suit our local tastes, just like American Chinese restaurants, Japanese Chinese restaurants and other Chinese restaurants worldwide. I mean, its our country, our tastes, and these Chinese American restaurants are not found outside of China (I presume) Nobody point a gun at you and force you to come to China and eat our Chinese American food.
    4
  7345. Outwardly, USA expressed support for Japan dumping irradiated Fukushima waters. But inwardly, USA has maintained a ban on imports of farming and seafood products from the region near Fukushima. Yet JaYoe Nation thinks Chinese are just being racist against Japanese, when the real two-faced racist is outwardly supporting Japan's decision, but inwardly banning seafood imports from Fukushima?
    4
  7346.  @Andy-P  The Azov battalion are neo-Nazis in Ukraine who believe that ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Luhansk are inferior to Ukrainians and have been committing genocide against ethnic Russians in those two regions since USA and NATO overthrew Ukraine's democratically elected president in 2014. For 8 years, there have been shelling (on both sides) by the two republics and the Ukrainian army (primarily the Azob battalion stationed there). The Minsk accord was supposed to stop the fighting and allow a ceasefire, but the neo-Nazis in the Ukraine Army kept up the bombardment and sniping of civilians living in Donetsk Luhansk.
    4
  7347. "Shut up! We're talking about freedom of speech" Anyone else see the irony in the OP's statement?
    4
  7348.  @miracleman8022  How did China lied about Covid? Didn't China first reported it to the World Health Organization in 31st Dec 2019?
    4
  7349.  @cchannel7857  Cyrus has stated in his email that he's been very busy lately. It's not uncommon among business practices for payment details to be worked out at a later date after the initial business proposal, so what exactly are you trying to say? The end goal is that Cyrus declined payment in the end.
    4
  7350.  @viralanimatedphotos4463  You gave Eileen Gu the freedom to speak, then why Americans can't accept her speaking her wish to compete for China?
    4
  7351.  @jp95js  President Xi Jinping has shown to be a strong and competent leader, and great leaders often publish their books, then can't China do the same with Xi Jinping Thought? According to the Xi Jinping Thought: -The Communist Party of China should take a people-centric approach for the public interest. -The continuation of "comprehensive deepening of reforms". -Adopting new science-based ideas for "innovative, coordinated, green, open and shared development". -Following "socialism with Chinese characteristics" with "people as the masters of the country". -Governing China with Rule of Law. -Practice socialist core values, including Marxism, communism and socialism with Chinese characteristics. -"Improving people's livelihood and well-being is the primary goal of development". -Coexist well with nature with "energy conservation and environmental protection" policies and "contribute to global ecological safety". ... Then what's wrong with this way of thinking?
    4
  7352.  @MarkYeung1  Mainland China is has the world's largest population so if you divide our GDP by our enormous population, then of course the GDP per capital is lower than in Taiwan. And again, let's not forget the fact that Taiwan's economic growth was at it's highest under the authoritarian single-party KMT rule. Since Taiwan actually flourished under authoritarian rule, then why is there a need to adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    4
  7353.  @jp95js  Have you actually tried Fish Head for yourself? It's actually among the tastiest parts of the fish, the meat more tender than other parts. Not to mention that nothing goes to waste. Most Westerners just cut off the head and tail and eat the body, leaving behind food waste.
    4
  7354.  @jp95js  The brain and fat in a fish head are rich in Vitamin A as well as Omega-3. The fat in a fish head is actually delicious. The meat from a fish head is more tender with a delectable fatty texture. Keeping the fish head will also enhance the flavor.
    4
  7355.  @jp95js  The French eat snails and horsemeat, the British have rabbit stew recipes. Australians eat kangaroo, crocodile and emu meat, so what's wrong with different cultures having different cuisines?
    4
  7356.  @jp95js  But the World Health Organization has sent an investigation team to visit Wuhan and their findings indicate that the coronavirus entered Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market from an external source. And they've all but dismissed the possibility of a lab leak as highly unlikely. And those batsoup videos were actually filmed in Panau, an island near Indonesia not in Wuhan city.
    4
  7357.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "KMT has accepted democracy. If CCP can do the same, then we can do one country one system and unified China." Why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and fled to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Defeating the communists should have been a piece of cake, yet despite all their initial advantages, the KMT lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while at the same time, cementing the communists right to rule China.
    4
  7358. @Karen Xitler China is currently observing a zero covid policy to curb the spread of Covid-19 and reduce the chance of mutation. Whereas the United States just let Covid-19 run rampart and increases the chances of new coronavirus strains emerging as a result of mass transmission, then isn't the United States the real virus factory here?
    4
  7359.  @cokezzz8249  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    4
  7360. It's CNN (American) but shows footage from BBC (British) and quotes an independent report by German. In short, its fake borrowed news.
    4
  7361.  @MarkYeung1  What makes you think Chinese mainlanders don't know about Chinese success stories in the West? So many Chinese actors came before Simu Liu in Hollywood, such as Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Chow Yun Fatt, Donnie Yen, Tony Leung, and so on. Yet Simu Liu acted like there was no one representing Asians in Hollywood while growing up? It's disrespectful of him to dismiss his predecessors and pioneers of Hollywood.
    4
  7362.  @vihodanyet  For those people who say Cyrus is one-sided, well, Cyrus is an American Citizen. He has no power to change China's policies no matter how he feels about it, but however, he can change America's policies since he's an American citizen. What concerns Cyrus is that U.S-China relations are deteriorating which could potentially lead to war (a disaster for the two countries, as well as the rest of the world) so he's doing whatever is within his power to avoid that worst case scenario.
    4
  7363.  @night6724  If the Communist Party of China is genocidal then why is China the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people? Even the populations of ethnic minorities in China have grown over the years, so what genocide are you talking about?
    4
  7364.  @luodeligesi7238  Putin never said Ukraine belongs to Russia, he said: “Ukraine never had a tradition of genuine statehood,” and that the nation now known as Ukraine was carved out of Russia by Soviet leader Vladimir Lenin. In 2021, Putin wrote an essay titled, On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians, explaining his belief that Russians and Ukrainians are one people divided artificially by borders and outsiders.
    4
  7365. @Huai Danny How is the analogy of a man and woman getting divorced being sexist?
    4
  7366.  @ladodah  Foreign companies that come to China and set up shop here often require access to Western websites like YouTube, Facebook, Google, so the government issue VPN licences for these companies to operate in China. As long as people use VPN from the list of government-approved VPN providers, then nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China. As for Chairman Mao, he did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    4
  7367.  @abies2000  Indeed, Cyrus' first video commenting on the Ukraine crisis drew a strong response from his audience. Yes, I was there and I said something along the lines of that he was acutely aware of Western MSM painting China in a negative light, then has he considered Western MSM might do the same to Russia? He has since broadened his perspective indeed, but still maintains his original stance in his first vid I believe.
    4
  7368.  @putianren  You said: "I always keep an open mind until such time... I never "judge a book by it's cover"" But apparently you judge Cyrus Janssen by his nationality as an American. Earlier you said: "So don't be disappointed, after all, he is an American !!" then don't your words imply you are against Americans? Brian Berletic is an American too, so are you going to against him too?
    4
  7369.  @chowcheebai1139  你新加坡人难道看不懂什么是笑话？
    4
  7370.  @ce8354  "神州 Shenzhou pasta is not from China." Did I ever said pasta is from China? Chinese noodles were invented long ago and the earliest written record of noodles is found in a book dated to the Eastern Han period (25–220 CE). The oldest evidence of noodle consumption was from 4,000 years ago in China. In 2005, a team of archaeologists reported finding an earthenware bowl that contained 4000-year-old noodles at the Lajia (喇家) archaeological site. These noodles were said to resemble lamian, a type of Chinese noodle.
    4
  7371. Gordon Chan predict Chinese economy will fail, but China is world's 2nd largest economy and still going strong.
    4
  7372. Here's a Chinese analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family, which in turn would lead them right up to her ex-husband's doorstep. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    4
  7373. What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Haven't you seen Chinese tourists, visiting your lands and spending coin on your economies? How about your Western schools and universities being positively flooded by Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers? Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 China now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more Chinese people can be virtually found all over the globe today, since we make up a fifth of the entire world's population after all.
    4
  7374.  @oratiog9036  You're calling me an invading pest? Western society had literally changed the entire face of the world's continents in just a span of a few centuries! Western society was built upon the backs of African slaves, genocide of the Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, occupation of their lands even till today, brutal colonialism of Asia (India, Hong Kong, Singapore, etc) and Africa and plundering of resources like gold from America. Westerners today are so wealthy because they're sitting on a pile of wealth that their ancestors obtained from Asia, Africa, Australia and America.
    4
  7375.  @item6931  Russia doesn't want countries to hold their currency, but if 300 billion of Russia's foreign reserves have been frozen by the west, then shouldn't it be returned to Russia?
    4
  7376.  @item6931  "神州 Shenzhou No, it shouldn't. It should be given to Ukraine as part of war reparations" But the U.S and NATO have clearly stated that they are not party to the conflict in Ukraine, and neither have they formally declared that they are at war with Russia, then how can they seize Russia's foreign reserves? If anything, this is only going to speed up de-dollarization.
    4
  7377. China is the USA's biggest trade partner, compared to Philippines. In SEA, USA also access to Singapore port facilities, compared to Philippines, and Singapore is the origin of many US carrier missions to SCS. President Trump himself has many businesses in China, so why would USA go to war with China for Philippines sake?
    4
  7378. I never said that PH is not important to USA. I said that compared to China, what makes USA willing to go to war with China for Philippines sake? Simple and logical comparison here that's all. And I pointed out other South East Asian countries (like Singapore) that are host to US military bases and that Philippines is not the ONLY country in SEA that America has a hold of.
    4
  7379. Philippine President Duterte has been very vocal in his opposition to USA (because the Obama administration refused to sell weapons to Philippines, because of his methods of dealing with drug dealers) And like I said, Philippines is not the ONLY SEA country that USA sends its warships to, and Singapore is an example of SEA country that is the origin of many US aircraft carrier missions. And I never claimed that Philippines was not important, I only said that compared to China, China has much more to offer to USA that's all compared to Philippines, so why would USA go to war with China for Philippines sake?
    4
  7380.  @josesilva4171  "no. Peace only when the last Russian soldier leaves or when there are no Ukrainians." You're saying that Ukrainians must fight to every last one? Just for plots of lands? How's that looking out for the interests of Ukraine?
    4
  7381. ​ @josesilva4171  "I am not Ukrainian. It is not my land that was invaded." Then who are you to tell Ukrainians to fight till there are no more Ukrainians?
    4
  7382. By the end of this war, Ukraine would probably be littered with all manner of NATO weapon relics, and any surviving NATO weapons would be captured by the Russians.
    4
  7383.  @allthebest1288  Joke? So you believe China hasn't overtaken Singapore in many ways?
    4
  7384.  @rabournm  You said: "But there were famines just this past year and insane flooding, all thanks to the CCP." This is precisely the kind "blame CPC for famine" tactic when the floods were caused by bad weather. An entire year's worth of rainfall fell in just 3 days in Zhengzhou, no city could have prepared for this once-in-a-thousand-years disaster, but again, you just attribute the blame to the Communist Party of China. As if the CPC is somehow responsible for the weather.
    4
  7385.  @The5thBranch  You said: "Please at your President Xi and he is preparing to invade Taiwan." How is President Xi preparing to launch an attack on Taiwan? Is there a build-up of People's Liberation Army soldiers at the mainland border with Taiwan in the Taiwan Strait (like Russia's buildup of troops along its border with Ukraine)?
    4
  7386.  @wally6193  So release Meng Wanzhou already and send her back to China, what is Canada waiting for? Canada started this whole mess, they know exactly how to end this stalemate.
    4
  7387.  @quekjoseph836  Meng Wanzhou's father didn't fly over to Canada because his daughter was kidnapped, so why would he send himself over? And if you are accusing Huawei of breaking US sanctions on Iran, then Canada also broke the US sanctions on Iran, yet USA close one eye for Canada, but target China instead?
    4
  7388.  @songsabai3794  Why do people keep bringing up Meng's residence? Meng is still obstructed from performing her job as Huawei's CFO, because of house arrest. Because the USA wants to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride that's all.
    4
  7389.  @yslee1401  Huawei is banned in the United States of America, why the heck would your conspiracy theory of Huawei CFO wanting to defect to USA even make sense?
    4
  7390.  @bigboss337  "CPC still rebelled against RoC yeah?" Before the CPC came to power, the previous Kuomintang (Guomindang) also rebelled against Qing Dynasty before establishing RoC (1912-1949). So you can call the KMT rebels too isn't it?
    4
  7391.  @acheeyk  "神州 Shenzhou simple question. Yet so difficult for communist china as they had a hand in starting this conflict." Do you have evidence that China had a hand in starting this conflict? Otherwise why are you seemingly trying to implicate China? China is under no obligation to just "condemn" Russia just because a Western reporter says so. China's stance has been to support a peaceful resolution to the conflict in Ukraine.
    4
  7392.  @kuldeepl5167  Jai Hind 🇮🇳 from China!
    4
  7393. The U.S printing dollars backed by nothing is kinda like that cartoon where Wild E Coyote chases Road Runner off a cliff and continues "running on mid-air". It's only a matter of time before gravity finally "catches up with him," that's when the USD will fall.
    4
  7394. China is also seeking to woo the Pacific Island nations of Marshall Islands, Nauru, Palau, and Tuvalu in hopes of them switching their recognition of Taipei to Beijing. Much like how the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua recently switched their recognition to Beijing.
    4
  7395.  @namelesssnitchy  China can't afford to host the world's largest prison incarceration population like the USA, that's why capital punishment is necessary in China. Prison shouldn't be a funfair, it is a punishment to deter potential criminals, that's why capital punishment is necessary so potential criminals don't think their lives are safe with just imprisonment.
    4
  7396.  @fireiron369  "神州 Shenzhou call it intuition." Intuition is not evidence. Peng Shuai is trying to lay low and avoid the public eye for a while until this all blows over, and she has expressed her desire for personal privacy during a video call with IOC. But the WTA is trying to pry into her personal affairs and demanding she appear in public and bare her private life for all the world to see.
    4
  7397. They can always take their cash to the bank to convert it into digital form.
    4
  7398.  @andrenogueira5058  The Tibetans have found that their quality of improved. Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    4
  7399.  @Andy-P  "Firing missiles at Taiwan is an act of war. Taiwanese will die." Did mainland China fire missiles at Taiwan? And if it's an act of war, then why is it when former President Trump launched 59 Tomahawk missiles at Syria in 2017, no one in the Western hemisphere complained? In fact, many U.S allies supported Trump launching missiles at Syria.
    4
  7400.  @bhgder3423  serpentza spent at least 15 years in China, yet his Mandarin proficiency sucks and you can't hold proper conversations with serpentza in Mandarin over everyday topics, because his Mandarin vocabulary is around that of an 8-year old.
    4
  7401.  @valuedcustomer8922  Studies have shown that India ranks among the world's most racist countries. worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/most-racist-countries
    4
  7402. Reasonable prices? Are American workers themselves willing to work for the same low pay as Chinese workers? If not, then its going to be tough to maintain your "reasonable" prices.
    4
  7403.  @amandabosca1714  You said: "How can you be neutral about Russia invading sovereign countries?" Ukraine lost its sovereignty in 2014 with the Maiidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) overthrowing the democratically elected Ukrainian president Yanukovych and installing their own US pupet government into power. We know this from audio recordings of Victoria Nuland with Geoffrey Pyatt indicating who they would like to see in power in Kiev.
    4
  7404.  @billyehh  "The one child policy has led to many females being aborted is another problem." China's gender imbalance is not caused by the One Child Policy, it's due to Chinese/Asian cultural perceptions. Take India for example, they did not implement any One Child Policy, yet India's has a more uneven gender imbalance than China's. In the 25-54 years category, China's ratio is 1.05, whereas India's is 1.07 for the same category. ... Source: The World Factbook
    4
  7405.  @MrPakurfulo  Studies have shown that Chinese people (also other Asians like Japanese, Koreans) are among the most intelligent and diligent peoples with long histories and rich cultures. Asian people often typically stereotyped as smart, industrious, studious, thrifty, good at math, good at science, good at programming, having a good head for business and finances. Stereotypical Asian blue-collar jobs often have an element of hard work to them, and include railroad construction workers, labourers (coolies), farmers, grocery stall owner, rickshaw drivers, chefs (of Chinese restaurants), dry cleaners, laundromat workers, nail salon workers, massage parlour workers, and so on. Poor Asian parents are usually thrifty and painstakingly save up money to send our kids to school. Asian kids study hard for exams and don't fool around through partying and drinking and when they graduate, they often take on white-collar jobs like doctors, lawyers, dentists, bankers, scientists, researchers, programmers, businessmen, and so on. Of course, these are all just stereotypes and not every Chinese person is like that. But the fact that these stereotypes exist suggests that there must be an element of truth to these stereotypes.
    4
  7406.  @MrPakurfulo  Xinjiang was part of China long before Islam itself was born! Xinjiang was first referred to as "Xiyu" (西域), under the Han dynasty, which drove the Xiongnu empire out of the region in 60 BCE in an effort to secure the profitable Silk Road. Only later did the Islamic invaders conquered the region and converted the natives to Islam.
    4
  7407.  @mohammadpanjshiripanjshiri6963  In the West, just because they are accommodating refugees, doesn't mean that the local people actually respect your religion.There is such thing called "political correctness" where people are afraid of voicing their true opinions, for fear of being labelled "racists", "Islamophobes." Even when British people protest against Islamic extremism, they are being labelled as Anti-Muslim as shown here. Video: Anti-Islamists Demonstrate in Britain: Hate in Europe youtube.com/watch?v=lJaiJ_maUEY So why can't China seize control of Muslims who are on the verge of extremism in China, and then bring them back by reforming their way, providing free education and job skills training to prepare them for the workforce?
    4
  7408. @Danish Khan Over 70 years ago, nobody ever thought "communist" China would ever succeed, or that China would ever play a prominent role in today's history. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1990s, everyone expected China would soon follow. But China has consistently defied all expectations of imminent failure, and succeeded long after the USSR dissolution. The Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again, which government body is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates plummeted. This graph shows life-expectencies across China, India, Europe and USA. Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China), the world's 3rd largest arms exporter, having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army and funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And China today has strong global presence as well being influential player of world politics. And its all achieved under the CCP leadership, despite decades of Westerners fully expecting China to fail, China has continually succeeded, so why continue to believe those biased Westerners views about China?
    4
  7409. U.S drone strikes are just the Military Industrial Complex's way of justifying the U.S military budget.
    4
  7410. 别说采访了日本/韩国农村人，连日本/韩国城市人会说日本/韩国是第一吗？
    4
  7411.  @hoetato4193  Virtually all the new cases are imported cases from overseas Chinese returning to China (because they just don't feel safe in the West) so they are all stopped at the airport and quarantined for 14 days first, so they won't infect the local population.
    4
  7412. Elon Musk opened Tesla's first overseas gigafactory in Shanghai. Video: Tesla breaks ground on gigafactory in Shanghai youtube.com/watch?v=XWzWu6awC4w so who's closing down shops? The store-owners in Hong Kong, because of the ongoing HK protests?
    4
  7413.  Steve Bingham  I showed people this a short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    4
  7414.  @Grockrobin  "Australia has supported the Solomon Islands since 1899. To have an authoritarian state waltz in, in the last 5 minutes," The Solomon Islands is a sovereign country, can't they choose to accept deals from BOTH Australia AND China? If anything, China is literally Australia's biggest trading partner, why is Australia perceiving China as a threat?
    4
  7415.  @soundbite290  According to your source, it was Hong Kong government that choose to ban Agnes Chow, so what has mainland China got to do with it? Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor insisted it had been done by the book. Source: scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2130714/hong-kong-activist-agnes-chow-banned-legco-election “Any suggestion of ‘Hong Kong independence’, ‘self-determination’, independence as a choice, or self-autonomy, is not in line with Basic Law requirements, and deviates from the important principle of ‘one country two systems’,” she said, referring to the city’s mini-constitution.
    4
  7416.  @soundbite290  Why are you shouting in capital letters? Your source only mentions a single line about "pressure from mainland China" but where's the proof? You just believe that line that's all?
    4
  7417.  @donjon6244  Who says you cannot force anyone into Islamic religion? Non-Muslims have to covert to Islam if they marry a Muslim, and many Muslims view people who leave Islam as traitors and deserve being stoned to death.
    4
  7418.  @nurkholis6975  You are from Indonesia? The world's largest Muslim population country? Did you know Suharto even banned expressions of Chinese culture through language, religion, and traditional festivals and the ethnic Chinese were pressured to adopt Indonesian-sounding names? Since Muslims did such a thing to Chinese in Indonesia, then why can't China do the same thing to Muslims in China? Your country, your rules. Our country, our rules.
    4
  7419. Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous relationship with a much older man has been revealed and that's why she's been avoiding the public eye for weeks. She has expressed a desire for personal privacy during the video call with IOC, but the WTA are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see, instead of respecting her wishes for personal privacy.
    4
  7420.  @jtf873  You said: "Ukraine willingly gave up its nuclear weapons and Russia didn't." Those nuclear weapons were created in the Soviet Union of which Russia and Ukraine were a part of. After the USSR dissolved, Russia was meant to be the inheritor of the Soviet Union, which was why the nuclear weapons in Ukraine were transferred over to Russia. If you're saying Russia didn't give up its nuclear weapons, well why didn't the US gave up theirs?
    4
  7421.  @dpelpal  When did Putin ever said he'll take Kiev in 3 days? Could you could me Putin's exact words? Because it's actually Bill Burns that said that.
    4
  7422.  @biggpicture2930  "Why would they draw a 11 dash lines, if colonization is their game." China first claimed the South China Sea Islands when the Republic of China 🇹🇼 published the 11 Dash Line back in 1947. The ROC later lost the mainland to the communists and they fled to Taiwan, but till today, Taiwan still maintains the claim to the 11 Dash Line. The new People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 modifies its claim to a 9 Dash Line. Also, the islands in the South China Sea were uninhabited, so can it truly be considered colonization when there were no people living in those islands?
    4
  7423.  Cheng-Tso Hsieh  Firstly, South Korea is NOT Taiwan, so what happens in one doesn't necessarily mean it will in the other. Secondly, S. Korea's economic growth occurred under S. Korean dictator Park Chung-hee, who was credited for the Miracle on the Han River (漢江의 奇蹟) despite being authoritarian. When Park first came to power in 1961, South Korea's per capita income was only US$72.00 (lower than Sub-Saharan African countries) and North Korea was the greater economic and military power on the peninsula. One of Park's main goals was to end the poverty of South Korea, and lift the country up from being a Third World economy to a First World economy via statist methods. Park is credited with playing a pivotal role in the development of South Korea's tiger economy by shifting its focus to export-oriented industrialisation. But Park was also a dictator, especially during later years when in 1972, Park declared martial law and amended the constitution into a highly authoritarian document. During this time, political opposition and dissent was constantly repressed and Park had complete control of the military, and much control over the media and expressions of art. In other words, South Korea's economic growth had occurred under authoritarian rule, instead of under democracy.
    4
  7424.  @rosalynnchow5057  Agreed. The CPC has their hands full governing such a huge population as mainland China, that they can afford to let the Taiwan government govern Taiwan island for the moment. In fact, President Xi previously proposed that the One Country, Two System policy be extended to include Taiwan, allowing Taiwan government to continue running the island, but for Taiwan be considered fully reunified with the mainland by both sides. It's too bad the former Taiwan President Ma rejected Xi's proposal.
    4
  7425.  @ItsJustCartier  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China nearly quadrupled from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses (1953-2020) 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 ... Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    4
  7426. The USA has 300 million consumers, but if China can transform our 1.4 billion population into consumers ourselves, then China will be the biggest market in the world, if we aren't already.
    4
  7427.  @MarkYeung1  Liu Xiaobo was a radical who was jailed for engaging in activities designed to overthrow the Chinese government, how is he deserving of a Nobel Peace prize?
    4
  7428.  @peterhanssens7260  You boasted about innovation, free market and competition, yet Nortel clearly lost the competition to Huawei, and you're crying foul? Nortel had in fact been in trouble for years, suffering huge losses when the dot com bubble burst, never recovering from that disaster and making widely criticized management decisions during its final years. Yet you rather blame Huawei for succeeding where Nortel has failed? In a major study into the reasons behind the company’s demise, Calof and colleagues at his university’s Telfer School of Management did not even mention the hacking or other espionage. Despite its stellar reputation for developing cutting-edge technology, customers eventually just weren’t buying what it had to sell, he said. “They lost sales not because of technology copying, not because of inferior technology, they lost because the customers lost faith in them,” says Calof. “They did not believe that Nortel would be alive in 10 years.” This is the nature of competition, Huawei has succeeded where Nortel has failed. Huawei itself says the allegations of espionage are unfounded, and that no government or customer in Canada has ever accused it of wrongdoing. As part of what is now a $15-billion annual research and development budget, it has spent $650 million on R&D over the last decade in Canada, where it has 1,200 employees, notes company spokesman Alykhan Velshi.
    4
  7429.  @peterhanssens7260  Let's use a non-Chinese example. Before the 1917 Communist Revolution, Russia was once arguably the poorest country in Europe, full of starving peasants and workers under the corrupt Tsar. Russia was poorer and technologically backward compared to it's wealthier, developed Western European countries like Germany, UK France, etc at that time. Fast-forward after the 1917 Communist Revolution by the Bolsheviks, and the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe, both economically and militarily (that's why NATO was formed in response to Soviet Union's rising military might). The Soviet Union was even the world's 2nd largest economy from 1960-1985 during it's heyday. Source: Soviet Union was world's 2nd largest economy from 1960-1985 wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_largest_historical_GDP#Overview_of_the_ten_largest_economies Such an ideology that transformed arguably Europe's poorest, most backward country, into the strongest, yet Westerners constantly demonized such an ideology as incapable of innovation?
    4
  7430.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "China wants in some way to export it's authoritarian model, this narrative about not wanting to dominate is suspicious." President Xi Jinping has publicly stated that "China's political system is not for export." China will not export its political system, President Xi Jinping told a forum for foreign political groups on Friday, as the ruling Communist Party seeks to boost its global image and take a more assertive international role. Source: Reuters: President Xi says China will not export its political system reuters.com/article/us-china-parties-idUSKBN1DV4UM “We will not import other countries’ models, and will not export the China model,” Xi said. “We will provide more opportunities for the world through our development,” he said. On the other hand, the USA is clearly exporting its political system around globe, waging wars in the Middle East for example, and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    4
  7431.  @peterhanssens7260  The very fact that Canada decided to take up the US extradition request (where dozens of other countries with extradition treaties with the US didn't) already shows that Canada is mixing politics with business. You're involving the USA, what makes you claim Canada is not bringing politics into this? A total of 111 countries have signed extradition treaties with the U.S., and dozens among them received extradition requests, but none of them followed this ridiculous idea, until Meng entered Canada. From September to December 2018, Meng traveled to France, Britain, Ireland, Poland, Singapore, Japan and Belgium. All seven countries are having a bilateral agreement on extradition with the U.S. Canada was the only one that accepted the U.S. extradition, this clearly shows that Canada is mixing politics with business here.
    4
  7432.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "Don't forget that innovation generally came from the following…… What they all have in common is, democratic governance where true innovation is free from any intervention of any kind." The Soviet Union made numerous advancements in science and technology under the leadership of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. The Soviets even invented and launched the world's first artificial satellite, Sputnik-1 on October 4, 1957. On October 4, 1957, the Soviet Union sent the beach ball-sized satellite, Sputnik 1 into space. The launch grabbed the world’s attention because it was at the height of the Cold War. Video: The Sputnik 1 Launch: The First Artificial Satellite To Enter Earth's Orbit youtu.be/g2WaJdflqT0 The Soviet Union are an example of how an authoritarian country is still capable of great innovation and advancing science and technology. Likewise, China's current political system has shown to be capable of innovation, then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    4
  7433.  @peterhanssens7260  The Soviet Union even invented the spacesuit and the first man in space is Soviet Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, on April 12, 1961. On April 12, 1961, Soviet cosmonaut, Yuri Gagarin, made history at the age of 27 by completing a single orbit of Earth in approximately 108 minutes. After more than 50 years, Gagarin’s journey is still regarded as a key moment in space history that paved the way for all future space endeavors that followed. Video: Yuri Gagarin Became The First Human In Space, 57 Years Ago Today youtu.be/vkVAqNbX0Nw Despite being a totalitarian country, the Soviet Union has shown to be capable of innovation and advancing science and technology, yet why did you keep claiming totalitarian state is detrimental to critical thinking? Where's proof of your claims?
    4
  7434.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "Now that China has mastered high speed train technology from Japan, it has been opportunistic by shutting out Japanese Train Companies from the bidding process. Chinese industry can be predatory and opportunistic in that regard." Once again, you're describing the nature of competition. Japanese Train Technology is always welcome in to bid in China, but it's just that China's high speed train technology has reached a level where it's superior to Japanese train technology, that's why more customers in China prefer Chinese train technology over Japan's. I mean, you boasted about innovation, free market and competition, but when China successfully outcompetes a competitor, you're blaming Chinese industry as predatory and opportunistic? What biased double standards is this? You said: "There is a reason why there are so many Mainland Chinese students at American, Australian, Canadian and UK schools, that's where the expertise is from having done the hard work. The reason is because people in China are becoming wealthier, our middle class is growing rich enough to send our kids overseas to study abroad in Western schools and universities. Many overseas Chinese students are also coming back to China after graduation, bringing foreign knowledge and technology back to China.
    4
  7435.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "As to the political part of life, would one, given the choice to live in a democracy with the freedoms associated with that life or a one party state run by a Party that seized power and kept it for it ?" If the dictatorship has shown to be viable for our country and able to produce results that ordinary people enjoy, then I don't see anything wrong with an alternative political system to Western brand of democracy. Look at India (world's largest democracy) and why hasn't India surpassed China, despite being a Western brand of democracy? Both China and India are the two countries with the world's largest populations (1.4 billion for China, 1.3 billion for India) and we were both dirt-poor countries in the past. Yet under a one-party system, China has succeeded where India hasn't under Western democracy, so is there a really a need for China to abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? …… You said: "Don't forget the major players in the CCP, a great deal of them are children or have past connections to the party either through Parents or others." The Communist Party of China is a meritocracy, selecting and promoting its members based on deeds performed, not through family bloodlines. The top student of every school (or the top 5%) with the best grades is recruited to join the CPC and contribute their brainpower to China. The new members are put on probation for one year, before becoming a full fledged communist member and being allowed to participate in political decision-making, rising through the ranks by garnering votes from other politically experienced communist members.
    4
  7436.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "You must know that the upper elites of the CCP have money, lots of it, in offshore accounts, in US dollars, the World's reserve currency." The Communists Party of China has over 90,000,000 members and only about 100 members are billionaires. That's less than 0.000001% of the party membership being rich. And about US Dollar being the world's reserve currency, China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's some time in the foreseeable future, so the Chinese Yuan could potentially topple the US Dollar one day in the future. Then all those rich people's US dollars become worthless in the future. …… You said: "Loyalty is to the Party first and foremost, what about China and the Chinese people where is their say ?" A recent long term Harvard University study has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. Source: Harvard survey finds Chinese satisfaction with govt rises china.org.cn/china/2020-07/17/content_76281590.htm
    4
  7437.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "Democracy is not perfect and doesn't pretend to be. Totalitarianism has been ruling China for just 70 + years who is to say that will continue ? No guarantees right ?" China once tried Western "democracy" back when Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949), but China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Chairman Mao, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today. China doesn't just have 70+ years of authoritarian rule, what about earlier 5000 years of Chinese history, being under the authoritarian rule of the Emperor and the Imperial Court? Democracy has even less of an impact on China than authoritarian rule, history has shown that China is at our most successful, when we are under authoritarian rule, so why is there a sudden need to abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so? …… You said: "The Chinese are not, by tradition, a militarist people and the Defense Forces of China are untested in long military conflicts, the recent conflict with India is proof of that. So are you saying that you want China to be a warmongering nation like the USA? China doesn't want war, but that doesn't mean China is weak. China is not afraid of war and we are constantly improving our defenses so that invaders like Britain and Japan think twice before invading China like they did in the past.
    4
  7438.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "Mainland Chinese now have finally the right to travel because the CCP said so, "thank you daddy" they will see things and come back with stories but the travel experience will change them…" Yes, Chinese tourists are everywhere in world today, I myself have the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, but I was appalled at the sheer amount of Western anti-China propaganda out there. Whenever I bring up China's achievements, many Westerners just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill, or told me to "Go back to China if you like it there." These anti-China Westerners never even set foot in China and see what life is like here for themselves, yet they are already lecturing me (a Chinese) on how "evil" my own country's political system is. In 2018 over 100 million Chinese tourists travelled abroad, and 99.99% of Chinese choose to return back to China. This shows that majority of Chinese citizens aren't impressed with so-called Western democracy, in fact the election of Trump has shown how a system like Western democracy can suffer catastrophically. …… You said: "I personally think that Xi's aggressive behavior is counter to what the wise men of China want and I am sure that the powers to be outside the CCP want change." What aggressive behaviour? I've already shown that President Xi Jinping publicly stated that China's political system is not for export, and the fact remains that China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country. …… You said: "Dictatorship is easy and democracy is hard why, because democracy is an open system that are the results of many hard fought battles." About democracy, what makes you think allowing ordinary citizens to participate in political decision-making is a wise idea? Ordinary people are fickle and they make poor voters for several reasons: -Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (i.e. They may not turn up to vote, or they submit blank votes) -Ordinary people may base their vote on emotions, not logic (i.e. Many British don't like immigrants, so majority voted for Brexit) -Ordinary people are susceptible to foreign influences (i.e. Russian interference in US elections) -Ordinary people may simply lack awareness of the country's real political situation, to make informed decisions regarding the country's future. There's a host of other problems associated with democracy, so why not let those who know how to govern, govern? That's what China is doing and look at how successful China is.
    4
  7439. China is currently not at war with any country, and has been peaceful since our last major war in 1979. How is USA preserving peace, when USA is actively bombing countries in Middle East in the 21st century and cutting off their heads (Muammar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place? Now President Trump is targeting Syria and the Assad Regime is next on the list.
    4
  7440. +BoloYung Cultural Revolution was started by Mao Zedong, and it was actually aimed towards throwing off innate Chinese feelings of superiority towards our own traditions and culture. Mao Zedong did recognize that Chinese belief in superiority of our culture was actually hampering China's progress and began the revolution to cleanse China of old superstitions and traditions in order to move on. But he did not expect red guards (whom were university students) to actually destroy priceless Chinese historical treasures. Cultural Revolution was controversial matter but in the end, the government admitted its mistakes and Mao made self-criticism and stepped down as state chairman to allow Deng Xiaoping to the forefront. Nobody believes Chinese government is absolutely perfect, but at least it has recognized when something is not working and abandon policies that hinder it and move on. Just like when the government realize the communist market is not working out, they switched to capitalism in 1970s under Deng's economic reform. Like I said, China has 5000 years of history and culture and is too expansive to be completely destroyed by a single man or party alone. In the past, many Mongolian and Manchu rulers have also tried to eradicate Chinese culture, but in the end they have been mostly assimilated into it instead. So what makes you think Chinese culture is destroyed?
    4
  7441.  @santsuma  Wumao (五毛) simply means 50 cents in Chinese.
    4
  7442.  Dumb & Dumber  China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    4
  7443.  @Imlong_779  "神州 Shenzhou jammu kashmir territory is part of india lol get your facts right" Kashmir is historically part of Pakistan (remember, both Pakistan and India were part of British India before 1947) so Pakistan has the same historical claim to Kashmir as India if anything. Furthermore, Kashmir population majority mostly consists of Muslims, then can't Pakistan lay claim to it? If India is eyeing Pakistan's territory of Kashmir, then why don't India take that territory from Pakistan?
    4
  7444. 有些人的水平真的太低了。┐(￣～￣)┌
    4
  7445.  @MarkYeung1  Canada and Australia banned Chinese company Huawei.
    4
  7446. Why does Philippines have to involve its allies to solve its own territorial dispute? What makes you think USA would want to go to war with China for Philippines sake, over a piece of rock in South China Sea?
    4
  7447.  @ccpshillfactchecker7241  Then you better get off Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and other Western social media. All those news about "user's data leaks and privacy compromise" usually stem from those Western social media mentioned.
    4
  7448.  @cchannel7857  "Now Cyruss told us he wrote an email on April 19th, 2021, to turn down the cash offer. Really?" Cyrus Janssen stated in his email that he's been very busy lately, it's not uncommon for payment details to be discussed later after the business transaction has occurred, so how is what you say proof? And in any case, it was apparent that Cyrus had previously published his video of "Americans Don't Understand the Truth About China" and it was CGTN that approached him to ask for permission to publish HIS video on their website so that means he wasn't paid to make those videos in any case.
    4
  7449. It's said that people don't trust the people that they've wronged in the past.
    4
  7450.  @nanahuang8623  Westerners been polluting the Earth since 200-300 years ago, back when the Industrial Revolution first started in 1700s—1800s. Whereas China's industrialisation only kicked off the last 50 years or so.
    4
  7451. It's similar to how Google lost the majority market share in China to Baidu. While Google's market share climbed from 15% in mid-2006 to 31% in 2010, Baidu's shared increased its market share from 47% in mid-2006 to 64% in 2010, which is a significant lead. Because Baidu introduced many innovative features that Google didn't.
    4
  7452. NASA has been depending on Russian rocket engines to send their astronauts into space, can they even get themselves off the ground if they want to visit Tiangong?
    4
  7453.  @abbotsful  "神州 Shenzhou approximately 90% of antiques," So now you're just pulling statistics out of nowhere? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    4
  7454.  @abbotsful  Take ancient writing scripts for example and Chinese characters constitute the oldest continuously used system of writing in the world, having been used since 1200 BCE and today, Mandarin Chinese is the most spoken language in the world by number of speakers. Whereas other ancient scripts like Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia) Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered dead languages today, since they are no longer evolving with the times and no new words being added into their vocabulary. Source: Chinese characters wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_characters
    4
  7455.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou The cemetery of Confucius, an UNESCO cultural site, was seriously damaged during the cultural revolution." But it wasn't destroyed, isn't it? Then why do anti-China people still think that Chinese culture is destroyed?
    4
  7456.  @abbotsful  Traditional Chinese characters are still in use in China, you can find old buildings with traditional script, even song lyrics are usually written in traditional characters, and people in China still obviously speak Mandarin and write using Chinese characters. But can you say the same for Egyptian Hieroglyhs or Latin or Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia)? In fact, with minimal training, some Chinese students can read texts that are thousands of years old, like Sun Zi's The Art of War 《孙子兵法》 and The Analects of Confucius 《论语》 whereas many English students struggle with Old English in Shakespearean literature. Video: 3,000 years on, China's oracle bones shed new light on evolution of script youtu.be/sbXD1nwHEAw
    4
  7457.  @brandonmoreland4392  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    4
  7458.  @uselesshero.official  "神州 Shenzhou I think I didn't complain about the 'hatred' rather suggested that we're quite used to it." I believe I didn't mention anything about 'hatred' rather I said that Indians can complain about being maligned, that's fine, it's their view after all. I mean, China too faces a lot malignant news that has warped many foreigners views towards China (especially those foreigners who haven't set foot in China and see what life is like here for themselves). If a media has 'half - true' or biased news, then you should perhaps, attack the parts that are untrue, isn't it? And in my opinion, making a country better requires input from all levels of society, instead just complaining about a single group of people. Take combating Covid-19 in China for example, and you need the workers to build hospitals (like the 1000-bed hospital Huoshenshan 火神山 in Wuhan in 10 days), medical personnel to help the patients, the citizens to self-quarantine and the government to guide the people throughout this crisis. Everyone plays a part during a crisis, rather than just blaming a particular group of people.
    4
  7459.  Lynn Michael  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    4
  7460.  @ne0ge049  "the us can do that as well." The U.S has tested hypersonic weapons yes, but it was a failure according to the Pentagon. As for China's hypersonic testing, there were previous hypersonic weapons tests of DF-ZF, however, the latest test was actually a routine spaceflight launch testing re-usable spacecraft, not an actual hypersonic weapons test.
    4
  7461.  @evilpiglet  Agreed. Historically, the Han Chinese weren't as interested in conquest as compared to the Mongols and Manchus. The maps of Han dynasties like Song Dynasty and Ming Dynasty weren't as expansionist as the Yuan Dynasty (under the Mongols) and also the Qing Dynasty (under the Manchus).
    4
  7462. I keep hearing the Western news saying "U.S says China tested Hypersonic Missile" and while yes, China has had previously conducted hypersonic glider vehicle tests in the past through the DF-ZF, this latest "hypersonic test" turned out to be a routine spacecraft test for re-usable spacecraft that's all, according to China's Foreign Ministry. Even the U.S sources declined to elaborate on how they know it's a hypersonic weapon by China.
    4
  7463.  @fannyalbi9040  Agreed. During the Holocaust, there were Jew refugees, so if there was a Uighur genocide, there would be Uighur refugees flooding the surrounding regions. But there are none! Even the U.S has admitted zero Uighur refugees in the past two fiscal years (according to TIME magazine).
    4
  7464. According to World Tourism Rankings, China is the 4th most popular tourist destination in the world, after Spain, France and USA, and is the most popular Asian country for tourists (beating Japan, Korea and India) so why do you claim nobody likes China? All across the globe, China is the 2nd biggest economy and the biggest trading partner in many different countries.
    4
  7465.  @topsuperseven7910  Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for 30 years already?
    4
  7466.  @Carbuncle0168  You said: "That's why Communism is Evil" About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    4
  7467.  @maicholaa7482  The actual name of the party in Chinese is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where Zhōngguó (中国) means China and Gòngchǎndǎng (共产党) means Communist Party. So the correct name is the Communist Party of China (CPC) not the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
    4
  7468.  @miguellines5907  Correct, Xinjiang was part of China since before Jesus Christ himself was born, and it was called Xiyu (西域 "Western Regions").
    4
  7469. planetzito What about the simple fact that it was adlerzwei who first brought up Japan and South Korea into this discussion? You just blame Chinese nationalists for bringing up Japan and Korea, when it was clearly the OP who first mentioned those countries here?
    4
  7470. According to actual eyewitness at Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: The Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We’re ‘Remembering’ are British Lies globalresearch.ca/tiananmen-square-massacre-is-a-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies/5386080
    4
  7471.  @brianplum1825  Besides the Russian Tokamak, China is even investing into Nuclear Fusion reactors, building an "Artificial Sun" that reached temperatures 6 times hotter than the Sun. Video: China Made An Artificial Star 6 Times Hotter Than The Sun youtube.com/watch?v=oGE9MmG4zhk A team at the Hefei Institutes of Physical Science of the Chinese Academy of Sciences announced that its Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) reactor, has hit a new temperature of reaching 100 million degrees Celsius. The EAST has been dubbed as “artificial sun” since it replicates the process used by the sun to produce energy. It burns at 100 million degrees Celsius, which is over six times hotter than the core of the sun. The temperature of the real sun’s core is at around 15 million degrees Celsius. The state-of-the-art reactor is designed to turn hydrogen into cost-effective green energy. Source: China builds an ‘artificial sun’ that is 6 times hotter than our ‘natural sun’ techworm.net/2018/11/china-artificial-sun-six-times-hotter-natural-sun.html Nuclear fusion is a project that if successful, would theoretically supply power for the entire globe and to greatly reduce our over reliance on dwindling fossil fuel energy sources that pollute the Earth.
    4
  7472. @purushprakriti channel ‪Look at what India did‬: ‪1947 annex Kashmir ‬ ‪1949 annex Manipur ‬ ‪1949 annex Tripura ‬ ‪1951 hitting south Tibet ‬ ‪1954 annex Nagaland ‬ ‪1961 annex Goa‬ ‪1962 annex karapani of Nepal‬ ‪1962 attack China‬ ‪1971 annex Turtuk of Pakistan ‬ ‪1972 annex Tin Bigha of Bangladesh‬ 1975 attack and annex Sikkim 1983 attack Mauritius ‬ ‪1987 invade Sri Lanka ‬ ‪1990 attack Bhutan ‬ ‪2006 annex Dooars of Bhutan ‬ ‪2013 annex Moreh of Burma ‬ ‪2017 attack China ‬ ‪2017 attack Bhutan ‬ ‪2018 invade Maldives‬
    4
  7473.  @yslee1401  "KuoMintang made Taiwan a successful country" Taiwan is not a country. Taiwan island inalienable part of China. In the 1992 Consensus, Kuomintang acknowledged the One China principle that there is only One China, and that Taiwan is part of it.
    4
  7474.  @yslee1401  That's the last resort and it will only happen if Taiwan suddenly and formally declares independence. Taiwan island inalienable part of China, and countries all over the world acknowledge the One China principle that the island is part of China. Even the US, since the 1972 Shanghai Communique, formally acknowledged that "all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China", that Taiwan is part of it, and that the United States does not challenge that position. Even in their most recent statement, the US publicly does not support Taiwan independence.
    4
  7475. Agreed. More Americans need to listen to Cyrus Janssen too.
    4
  7476. "This is Defense Politics Aaasiaaaa!" - Love his channel's introduction! Also his cheeky "Shaolin Monks" and "Tampon Bridges" remarks.
    4
  7477. My personal favorite speakers for understanding the geopolitical situation, are Martin Jacques, Kishore Mabubani, Zhang Weiwei and Eric X. Li.
    4
  7478.  @yiboliang8338  谢谢，你太客气了。其实西方媒体对中国很傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    4
  7479.  @MrHistoryFan  Why is the US interested in selling nuclear submarines to Australia (a non-nuclear country)? How is Australia going to purchase the necessary nuclear fuel without violating nuclear non-proliferation?
    4
  7480. Agreed. I find it astonishing that Cyrus knows that China is unlike what the media in the west makes it out to be. Yet when it comes to Russia, Cyrus seemingly falls for the western narrative.
    4
  7481. They will also need Cyrus' open-mindedness and his willingness to find out what the other side is saying.
    4
  7482. Well, that appears to be the very definition of "opposing party". It's what they do. Oppose instead of cooperate for the good of the country.
    4
  7483.  @zeissiez  Well said. A point I would like to add is about foreign policy. Western democracies like the United States not only suffer from the domestic issues you described, but their foreign policy consists of 1. Warmongering to enrich the military-industrial complex, at the expense of citizens, tax-payers, casualties, etc. Wars create refugees who flee their conflicted homelands to settle in countries often with vastly different cultures from them, creating social friction in the process. 2. "Spreading Democracy" through programs like the Nature Endowment for Democracy (NED) which is merely a façade for the CIA to continue their activities out in open. Furthermore, the CIA is perfectly happy to install a dictatorship regime, so long as the puppet government remains loyal to Washington. 3. Sanctioning and slapping tariffs on perceived adversaries, like U.S sanctions on Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, North Korea, Russia, etc. Sanctions don't help anyone, instead it kills people by destroying economies, causing hyperinflation and unemployment so people cannot afford basic necessities.
    4
  7484.  @enriqueperezarce5485  Because mainland China has to host the world's largest population (approx 1.4 billion) so if you divide our GDP by our enormous population, then of course you'll arrive at a lower GDP per capita for mainland China as compared to Taiwan. For example, India is the world's 2nd most populous country, and also the largest self-declared democracy, yet China's GDP per capita is 10x higher than India's. Does that answer your question about GDP per capita? As for passports, China is special in that we allow multiple systems within our borders. For example, Hong Kong has their own separate system from the mainland, separate government, passport, currency, etc, yet Hong Kong is part of China. So likewise, even though Taiwan have their own passport, they are still part of China under the One China policy.
    4
  7485.  @danfisher7458  If you want to talk about prison populations, then it's actually the United States that's home to the world's largest prison incarceration rate, and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity, that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back onto the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons.
    4
  7486.  @mnbr6884  You said: "The colonised countries in SE Asia had no say in the matter." In 1958, the North Vietnam PM, Pham Van Dong had formally accepted that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese, and he wrote a letter to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai saying that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. Source: Wikipedia: 1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai Yet when rich oil and gas deposits were discovered in the region, suddenly Vietnam changed their decision and decided to start claiming those Chinese territory for themselves.
    4
  7487. The latest polls in Russia indicate that up to 70% of Russians support Putin and the special miltary operation in Ukraine, so it's far more likely that Biden will be removed from office sooner than Putin.
    4
  7488. The United States first cried foul with "unfair trade practices" and then starts slapping tariffs on China. So with this reply, China is giving them what they want.
    4
  7489.  @rv8804  If Chinese aren't buying US goods, then why blame China for being uninterested in your goods? How to define "even" or "fair" when it comes to trade? Did you know Huawei recently overtook Apple as world's 2nd largest smartphone maker, only behind Samsung at number one? This means more people in the world own Huawei phones instead of Apple iPhones. So if Chinese goods are better, then how is this unfair? Source: Huawei Overtakes Apple to Become Second Biggest Smartphone Maker bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-03/huawei-again-overtakes-apple-as-global-smartphone-market-tanks
    4
  7490. Many Filipinos tend to have "colonial mentality." Such people display a preference for all things Anglo-Saxon, while harboring disdain for things that are "non-white", including Chinese vaccines. Thus, even after the colonizer left, the people's minds remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. It's like a kind of Stockholm Syndrome.
    4
  7491. - king- China mangled India's interest? Then what about Indian troops trespassing into Doklam/Donglong to obstruct road construction? India does not even claim Doklam as part of its territory at all so why butt in?
    4
  7492. China always invite India to support Pakistan economic development, which is rare opportunity for both countries to finally mend their relations after 70 years of conflict. If Pakistan is economical stable, then less people will join the terrorists and Pakistan government will be interested in spending money to build their economy, instead of spending on defense all the time.
    4
  7493. Indian government shouldn't have let those migrants workers go back to their villages (where the vulnerable elderly folk) the government should have gathered them into a quarantine zone for 14 days first, before releasing them.
    4
  7494. Exactly, and foreign components in more complex military hardware can be subject to market conditions like increased prices. This is precisely why China is working towards manufacturing our own local fighter jet engines, instead of constantly relying on Russian engines.
    4
  7495.  @googlerwunn7344  You said: "You must be referring to the US politicians, ain't you?" And who put those U.S politicians in power? Answer: the American people themselves, since America is a democracy where American citizens voted for their leaders. So doesn't it boil down to the fact that Americans (majority of them) voted for their leaders?
    4
  7496. Do you actually have evidence that the government threatens her, her family, distant relatives and any friend she ever made? Then why do you seemingly jump to conclusions without proof?
    4
  7497. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it seems like the U.S is a threat to global peace and stability.
    4
  7498.  @wf645  According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. The government has aggressively enforced a sweeping “online falsehoods” law that permits government ministers to order the “correction” or removal of online content. Source: Human Rights Watch: Singapore So doesn't Singapore's political system sound similar to China's political system?
    4
  7499.  @DgurlSunshine  About ecocide, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    4
  7500.  @hangtuah888  "神州 Shenzhou I am so sorry you are just showing ignorance. Anglo Saxon pertained to the people from British Isles only, there is Germanic and various like Slavs are not Anglo Saxons." But the term Caucasian is even worst, it included people from Europe, Western, Central, and South Asia, North Africa, and the Horn of Africa. so it's very inaccurate when you use such an outdated term to refer to white people. Anglo Saxon (pertaining to the people from British Isles) is still more accurate, as the British had many colonies including United States, Canada, Australia, etc, that share this similar "Western" cultural values. You said: "The term Mongoloid whilst it is used to describe people with Down Syndrome, does not rendered the term invalid or pejorative." Go ahead and call say a Japanese person a Mongoloid then, and see whether it's offensive to them. I know it's offensive to me if someone calls me Mongoloid, especially when you know the connection to Down Syndrome then why continue using these outdated terms? You said: "Think about it as it really annoyed me that you opined on something you know very little about." So instead of refuting my points that I brought out, you choose to hurl insults against me by claiming I opined on something I know very little about? I just search the term Caucasian and found many articles showing that it's an outdated and borderline offensive term to many white people. You said: "Please do not get on your high horse and try and debate me on anything." Again, why are you seemingly trying to make this personal? High Horse? I'm saying that Caucasians as a term is rude to some people, how am I on a high horse when I'm taking in consideration white people's feelings towards the use of the term Caucasian? You said: "I had a Malaysian Chinese telling me that there are millions of underground Chinese who are christians. I told him the mere fact it is underground he would not be able to determine the numbers and how he can come up with that figure is beyond me." That's great for you, but what has your encounter with a Malaysian Chinese even got to do with this discussion? You said: "I constantly get comments from netizens who praised me that I used facts and figures to back up my comments." That's a great boast you made there, and surely you feel praised but people do make mistakes every now and then. You said: "I was shocked and aghast that you dare to state in writing that Caucasian hailed from the Caucasus." I just searched Wikipedia: Caucasian and the first entry is Anthropology -Anything from the Caucasus region -Peoples of the Caucasus, humans from the Caucasus region So what's so shocking to you that I dare to state in writing that Caucasian hailed from the Caucasus? Earlier you shamelessly boasted earlier that you get comments from netizens who praised you that you used facts and figures to back up your comments, but people still do mistakes now and then. You said: "It really showed the shallowness of your reading and worst understanding." At least I did some research, but I'm not the one shameless boasting how netizens praised me or anything like that. You said: "FYI, I hold degrees in Arts majoring in Political Science and well aware of the different genus classifying humanity as well as few other fields." That kinda sounds like a defensive boast that someone makes when seemingly challenged on his/her authority. Sounds like the argument of "Trust me, I'm an expert." even though we have no way of verifying whether your claims are true or not. You said: "I do not comment on YouTube out of ignorance." Well, there's always a first time for everything. You said: "It is okay to admit you do not know as I do not expect you to know unless you read widely." I believe I've never really admitted to knowing absolutely everything, but I've encountered such people who shamelessly boasted that netizens praised them that they "use facts," and they told me to "get off my high horse" as if I'm the one boasting like that. "But what I dislike and intolerant of is ignorance or falsehood." That I can agree with. I too dislike ignorance and falsehood, and I hope more people read up and learn what terms are considered possibly offensive to other races. We as Asians know what's offensive to us, but we should also learn what's offensive to other races and try to understand it from their point of view.
    4
  7501.  @abyyy490  China has no aspirations of world hegemony, then why is there a need to deploy troops in international lands and shores with actual military bases? That would be following in the same path that the US is taking right now, which has led them into numerous overseas wars that are unpopular among Americans back home. Why would China want to head down this same path.
    4
  7502. +PRCseparatedChina Taiwan Why is the One-Country Two-System not okay? Hong Kong has its own government, so does Macau, and the mainland have our own government, but all are part of China. China has even offered to extend this to Taiwan, and make Taiwan part of China, while still allowing Taiwan to keep its government and passport (just like HK has its own separate passport from the mainland) But Taiwan reject China's offer and did not offer a counterproposal of its own.
    4
  7503.  @vegikid100  "Unfortunately, the communist messed up. Their government needs a reform" The Chinese government has undergone reforms, like when the constitution was amended to remove term limits for the Chinese president.
    4
  7504.  @heromixzen6941  "Shenzhou. call that elections?" Other than Putin, there were 3 other candidates on the ballot paper to vote for. Russia also invited international observers from 36 countries to visit and observe the elections.
    4
  7505. China's ghost cities are slowly being filled up over the years, as millions of people migrate from the rural areas to the urban centers. For example, in 2011 it was reported that Zhengzhou was China’s largest Ghost City. But fast forward till today and Zhengzhou has a population of 12,600,574 inhabitants with a total GDP of 1.014 trillion (RMB) in 2018.
    4
  7506. Japan has been bound by 1945 WW2 surrender treaty (Article 9 of Japanese constitution) never to build its own military beyond that of a self-defense force. Why is Japan still bound by this 70 year old treaty? Even Japan's WW2 ally, Germany, is no longer bound by such treaty, and can build up its own military to as powerful as it wants. Imagine another 70 years into the future, and while China's and Korea's armies have grown, and Japan is still bound by WW2 treaty.
    4
  7507. Despite technological advances, humans are reaching the theoretical limit of just how small we can make silicon chips, and it's believed that silicon chips will soon reach the end of their natural lifespan. The next possible option is to switch the semiconductor material from silicon to carbon (graphene and carbon nanotubes), which offer several advantages such as better conductivity, low power consumption, better efficiency, and so on. China has made several breakthroughs in manufacturing carbon-based chips and if this success trend continues, China is poised to potentially leapfrog other countries in chip making. Video:youtu.be/OOy-iHPGkjI
    4
  7508.  @galling2052  You said: "How is a 6year extended term in wartime in anyway shape or Form compareable to what is going on in China or russia?" President Xi won his 3rd term in 2023 and was re-elected. President Putin won his 2024 re-election. But the point remains that Zelensky's term as president expired in May 2024 and he hasn't called for elections in Ukraine since.
    4
  7509.  @MarieSchipper-h9k  You said: "Ther ar no elections in war time. Mean russian bod." Russia held elections in 2024 and even America held elections during the American Civil War period.
    4
  7510. I'm sure many people are confused about the Ukraine/Russia conflict. Here's a Chinese analogy to explain the Ukraine/Russia situation better, in the form of a family drama to hopefully make it more understandable to audiences. More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), taking several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and generously left her with a lot of family property as well as paying off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (i.e NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain degree, (but) she was enraptured with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and someday dreams of marrying into the NATO family, and of surrounding and constricting her ex-husband. The village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the NATO family, because she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). Even his many wives did not want her into the family, yet they still encouraged her to join the family. In truth, the village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex husband and wife conflict, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to actually partake in the actual fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would have to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this helps clear up any confusion in the Ukraine/Russian war and puts it on a more relatable level.
    4
  7511. Cyrus, at 12:30 you said that: "From the United State's perspective, we will always support Israel, no matter what." But is the reason behind this unconditional support towards another country?
    4
  7512.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Not every comment has to be about the video isn't it? You're comment doesn't even have any topic of your own.
    4
  7513.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Why'd you choose to reply to me then, if all you do is insult me for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    4
  7514. India adopted democracy, and it did not bode well for the country. India's literacy rate is only 72.1% after all, which means over 25% of the country's population is illiterate, yet being democratic means that they get to vote in important political decisions regarding the country's future? 1 in 4 Indians hasn't been to school, so what makes them able to make informed decisions during elections?
    4
  7515. @Pub Comrad Why not have a logical discussion with me, instead of hurling childish insults? Because you have nothing intelligent to add to the discussion?
    4
  7516.  @MarkYeung1  The vast majority of the people of Taiwan are opposed to independence. Polls have shown that over 80% of Taiwan favor maintaining the status quo with the mainland. And the current status quo is that Taiwan island inalienable part of China. As for those underground churches, they were established because some Chinese began mixing religion with politics. These people are known as "Vatican Loyalists" because they have attempted to remain loyal to the Pope and the Holy See. Thus, the Chinese government reserves to right to clamp down on these political organizations that are loyal to foreign powers
    4
  7517.  @MarkYeung1  Had you really love China, then you would be trying to understand China. China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest continuous civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia have since succumbed to history. Yet instead of looking at things through a Chinese Lens, you tend to view China through your own Western Lens.
    4
  7518.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Today is September 30th. It is Truth and Reconciliation Day in Canada (where I live)" Today is October 1st. It's China's National Day, celebrating 75 anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China. Even though in the context of human civilization, 75 years is but a brief moment, yet it has profoundly impacted the course of world history. China has broken the myth that "modernization equals Westernization," showcasing an alternative vision of modernization and expanding the pathways for developing countries to achieve modernization. Sadly, there are still people that firmly cling to the belief that modernization equals Westernization.
    4
  7519.  @MarkYeung1  South Korea's modernization occurred under the authoritarian rule of Park Chung-hee. His economic reforms led to rapid economic growth and industrialization in South Korea that brought about the Miracle on the Han River (漢江의 奇蹟). Park is credited for sustaining economic growth which reshaped and modernize South Korea. Under Park's rule, South Korea possessed one of the fastest growing national economies during the 1960s and 1970s. Yet Park is also regarded as a highly repressive dictator who curtailed freedoms and committed human rights abuses during his rule. He modified the Constitution to become more authoritarian, and he constantly repressed political opposition and dissent during the later years of his tenure. So it's a fact that South Korea's modernization occurred under authoritarian rule, not under Western style democracy.
    4
  7520.  @MarkYeung1  "The cost of living for major mainland cities (Beijing, Shanghai, etc.) is among the highest in the world (proportion to income)." That's for the old Tier-1 cities (i.e Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou) which is the best that China has to offer. However the cost of living in the new Tier-1 cities (i.e Chengdu, Chongqing, Hangzhou, Wuhan, Nanjing, Tianjin, Suzhou, Xi'an, etc) is lower than in the old Tier-1, and oftentimes the quality of living is just as good. Food is cheap in China, so is gas, water, electricity in China. Transportation in China is very efficient, whether its train, bus, car-sharing, or even bicycle renting if people want to save money.
    4
  7521. A vote doesn't necessarily mean it will happen. Look at Catalonia referendum for independence, 90% voted in favor of independence, yet Spain doesn't recognize the referendum and Catalonia remains part of Spain today.
    4
  7522. I used to watch serpentza's earlier videos about China, showing both the positive and negative aspects of China in a balanced manner. However, he changed over the years and serpentza's latest videos about China have been largely negative in nature.
    4
  7523.  @51dbail  Gun runners referring to the U.S military-industrial complex.
    4
  7524.  @olivernorth-coombes4720  What makes you think Chinese people are not permitted to access YouTube? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YT while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    4
  7525. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 You keep saying that China "claims an entire ocean" as belonging to us, but which ocean are you talking about? Indian Ocean? Pacific Ocean? Atlantic Ocean?
    4
  7526. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 What "international waters" are you talking about? Here's a Map of International Waters (wikipedia.org/wiki/File:International_waters.svg ) and which DARK BLUE (i.e International Waters) area does China actually claim? It has to be DARK BLUE to be considered international waters, not LIGHT BLUE which aren't international waters.
    4
  7527. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 Evidence? Traces of Covid-19 have been found in Barcelona sewers in Spain, since March 2019, before the outbreak in Wuhan even began. Spanish virologists have found traces of the novel coronavirus in a sample of Barcelona waste water collected in March 2019, nine months before the COVID-19 disease was identified in China, the University of Barcelona Source: Coronavirus traces found in March 2019 sewage sample, Spanish study shows reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-spain-science-idUSKBN23X2HQ
    4
  7528.  @hammermanman5203  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According to Gregory Clark, all verified eyewitness accounts inside Tiananmen Square say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that fnothing happened* other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    4
  7529. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 The US CDC tested American blood samples dating back to 13 Dec 2019, and detected the presence of Covid-19 antibodies in patient's blood. It takes a few weeks for Covid-19 antibodies to develop once a person catches Covid-19, so this implies that Covid-19 was present in USA in November 2019, before outbreak in Wuhan even began. Researchers came to this conclusion after the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention analyzed blood donations collected by the American Red Cross from residents in nine states. They found evidence of coronavirus antibodies in 106 out of 7,389 blood donations. The CDC analyzed the blood collected between Dec. 13 and Jan. 17. Source: Coronavirus Was In U.S. Weeks Earlier Than Previously Known, Study Says npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/12/01/940395651/coronavirus-was-in-u-s-weeks-earlier-than-previously-known-study-says The presence of antibodies in a person's blood means they were exposed to a virus, in this case the coronavirus, and that their body's immune system triggered a defensive response. Researchers found coronavirus antibodies in 39 samples from California, Oregon, and Washington as early as Dec. 13 to Dec. 16. They also discovered antibodies in 67 samples from Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin in early January — before widespread outbreaks in those states.
    4
  7530. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 So clearly the presence of Covid-19 antibodies in American patient's blood samples dating to 13th Dec 2019 indicate that Covid-19 was in USA earlier, then why is it USA fail to detect Covid-19? USA has arguably the best doctors, best medical expertise, best medical facilities yet it was up to China with our inferior medical expertise to detect this mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019? You should literally be grateful for China discovering a previously unknown coronavirus that even the USA failed to detect.
    4
  7531. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 Then explain why coronavirus antibodies were detected in 106 out of 7,389 blood donations of Americans blood samples dating back to 13th Dec 2019. Why did USA with all their advanced medical facilities, still failed to detect Covid-19 and it was up to China with our inferior medical facilities to sound the alarm of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. You should also read the WHO Investigation team that visited China on January 2021, their report on the coronavirus origins in China are inconclusive.
    4
  7532.  @Rasyad95  Education is mandatory in China and all citizens must attend school for at least nine years, known as the nine-year compulsory education, which is funded by the government. Compulsory education includes six years of primary education, starting at age six or seven, and three years of junior secondary education (junior middle school) for ages 12 to 15.
    4
  7533. Chinese government and workers rushed to build a 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan) in Wuhan in 10 days and a 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan) in 12 days, yet foreigners called them "containers." Yet here is American government setting up "tents" for patients.
    4
  7534.  @Sean-giang  Taiwan island inalienable part of China. Even in the Olympics, athletes from Taiwan can only compete in the Olympics under the name "Chinese Taipei."
    4
  7535.  @Sean-giang  China is nothing like the two Koreas. Both the mainlanders and the people of Taiwan island agree to the 1992 Consensus that there is only One China. In the 1972 Shanghai joint Communique with the PRC, the United States "acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China and does not challenge that position.
    4
  7536.  @MarkYeung1  The American-Philippine war resulted in 4,000 American Soldiers died but 20,000 Filipino soldiers died and a whopping 250,000 Filipino civilians died. Source: The Philippine American War-The Shocking Truth youtu.be/bN2wrZGcs8s?t=299
    4
  7537.  Molly Wop Chainsaw  Like I said earlier, today's enemies can become tomorrow's friends. Just because countries are enemies today, doesn't necessarily mean that they will be enemies forever.
    4
  7538.  Giovanni Sanchez  Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    4
  7539. Chinese workers manufacture cheap goods like smartphones, computers, appliances, electronics, sneakers, clothing, etc, so that the cost of living in other countries is kept lower than it should be. Think of the millions of dollars people in other countries have saved on living expenses over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on finer things like cars, houses, getting married or on things like school fees, college tuition, doctor's bills.
    4
  7540. During the Century of Humiliation, China's territory was carved up (like a pie in that French illustration) and served to the Eight Nations. China has accepted that some pieces are no longer retrievable (i.e Vladivostok), while others like Hong Kong and Macau were eventually returned to China. The last remaining unclaimed piece is Taiwan island, and the mainland will spare no expense in reunifying Taiwan with the mainland. China will only resort to the military options once all other peaceful options have been exhausted.
    4
  7541.  @charliecooper3030  Google left China because it was unable to capture the majority market in China compared to Baidu (which also introduced several innovative features that Google didn't). . Google fumbled with an initially inferior Chinese search engine launched in 2000, while Baidu grabbed the lead in China–and kept it–with several innovative search features customized for local tastes. Baidu introduced community-oriented services that appealed to Chinese Internet users, including bulletin boards where leads on information could be exchanged–a service that Google China’s former president Kai-Fu Lee dismissed as having nothing to do with search. Baidu also offered instant messaging, a hit with China’s Netizens. Plus, Baidu was first to the market with mobile search and information offered up in multimedia, including video clips. Baidu also set up a national network of advertising resellers in 200 Chinese cities to educate businesses about the power of online advertising–a step that Google did not take. Source: Forbes: Why Google Is Quitting China
    4
  7542. Chinese scientists have found a method to convert sand to soil, using a blend of sand, water and a special kind of paste made from plant cellulose. Video: Chinese scientists find way to convert sand to soil youtu.be/idjegdl0L3Y Chinese researchers developed a paste made of plant cellulose, which helps retain water, nutrients and air. It's non-toxic, echo-friendly and affordable.
    4
  7543. BBC even did this to China. China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswomen Hua Chunying even pointed out that BBC is not trusted even in the U.K. Video: MOFA: BBC is not trusted even in the UK youtu.be/L0oo8PsUKrA
    4
  7544.  @yslee1401  The crime rate is low in China. Foreigners have visited China have remarked how safe the city streets are. Women aren't afraid to stay till late at night and walk out on the streets without fear of harassment, and these visitors have shared their personal experience of how safe China is at night.
    4
  7545. @S҉иarкs Hu Jintao was given the honor of sitting directly next to President Xi in the People's Hall. If this isn't a show of respect from Xi to Hu, then I don't know what sort of cultures and values that you subscribe to.
    4
  7546.  @MarkYeung1  Where's your local media reports? Here's Indian PM Narendra Modi saying that "Chinese troops did not enter Indian territory and no posts were taken, so how is China the aggressor? No One Entered Indian Territory: PM Narendra Modi's Big Message To China Over LAC Standoff youtu.be/5xlQwO8tWmM
    4
  7547. One of the reasons why the US-China trade deficit exists is because of different spending cultures. Many Chinese have a culture of being thrifty and saving up money for bad weather. Whereas American culture is about consumerism, over consumption and buying more stuff than they actually need. When combined, it results in the US-China trade deficit.
    4
  7548.  @EstanislaoSantino-xk8uz  Did you know that in the land of the blind, the man with one eye is king? Whereas in the land of the two-eyed, having one eye is a disadvantage.
    4
  7549. Agreed. Around 90% of the cotton harvesting in Xinjiang is mechanized and the Uighurs drive cotton-harvesting tractors, yet allegations of forced labor still persist in the West.
    4
  7550.  @carynmartin6053  What massive starvation? There was an initial gird lock of food distribution to Chinese cities under lockdown but it has since been cleared up. And many of the cities that were previously lockdowned and reopened since.
    4
  7551.  @Andy-P  Earlier in Jan 2022, in the same UK city of Manchester, a Chinese woman (surname Wang) was similarly attacked by Hong Kong separatists, who gathered in Manchester at about 4:00 pm in front of her shop. She came out and debated with them after hearing them using the word "Shina,'' a derogatory term referring to China. "You can have your opinions, but I won't allow you to separate my country," Wang said in a video circulating on Chinese social media platforms. In the video, one of the separatists - wearing black like rioters in the 2019 violent protests in Hong Kong - suddenly attacked Wang with an umbrella. The Chinese Embassy in the UK condemned the "despicable action" of "Hong Kong independence rioters" for threatening and attacking a Chinese citizen in Manchester and urged British authorities to bring the perpetrators to justice. But the British police let the suspects go.
    4
  7552. They won't even call it "releasing" irradiated water they'll probably call it "dumping" nuclear waste to paint negative image of China. But for Japan, they civilised the term to "releasing" instead of "dumping"
    4
  7553.  @HappyHappy-po5er  Chinese nuclear reactors release treated waste that meet international safety standards. And what West Japan Sea are you talking about?
    4
  7554. According to Indian MEA, the withdrawal of Indian troops is almost complete, whereas Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson said PLA troops will continue to patrol the area.
    4
  7555.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "The PRC and the Philippines, pursuant to their treaty obligations under the Law of the Sea Convention, are legally bound to comply with this decision." China had made a declaration in 2006 in accordance with UNCLOS not to accept any of the procedures provided for in Section 2 of Part XV of Article 298 of the Convention, pertaining to compulsory arbitration on sovereign disputes and maritime delimitation. Therefore, China is not bound to comply with the arbitral tribunal, since China never agreed to settle the territorial dispute through arbitration.
    4
  7556.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou indeed. Hong Kong people have essentially lost the freedom to protest since the national security laws." Who says? in 2023, Hong Kong protestors demonstrated the scrapping of a local reclamation project in Tseung Kwan O they say will increase pollution in their middle-class neighborhood, yet you claim they don't have the freedom to protest?
    4
  7557.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Eugene knows why so many Hong Kong people have left over the last few years (nothing to do with the colonial mindset)." If it has nothing to do with the colonial mentality, then why do you claim they go to "UK, Australia, Canada, many EU nations"? Isn't this a symptom of the colonial mentality afflicting these Hong Kongers that have left?
    4
  7558.  @natalileon979  "It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." — Henry Kissinger
    4
  7559.  @bluemarlin9110  Agreed with your comment. That's why the U.S is singling out Chinese companies like Huawei and Bytedance (Tik Tok), instead of improving their own companies through competition.
    4
  7560. Western society was built on the backs of African slavery, genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, occupation of their lands even till today, brutal colonization of Africa and Asia (India, Hong Kong, Singapore) and plundering of resources like gold from Africa and Asia. That's why Westerners today are so rich, because they're sitting on a pile of wealth stolen from Africa, Asia, America and Australia.
    4
  7561. Agreed. I generally hope this way of life can continue, but however, if people are poor and just barely making ends meet, then they also deserve the opportunity to break the cycle of poverty as well.
    4
  7562.  @everythingandmore5537  China only confirmed the first death from the novel coronavirus — a 61-year-old man — on 11th January 2020, yet you're claiming Chinese doctors "magically" know that the virus is deadly in 1st December 2019, when the 1st death was on 11th January? How do you expect China know all the properties of the novel coronavirus right off the bat on Day 1?
    4
  7563. Shaivities If India really claims POK, then why hasn't it reclaimed that territory from Pakistan yet? You expect China to wait around forever for your country to solve your own disputes with Pakistan? Pakistan has agreed to come onboard Belt and Road Initiative, so why can China help Pakistan build infrastructure in its territory? India hasn't signed onboard OBOR, so why should China listen to India's requests here?
    4
  7564.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "If you attribute the stability to it, why can't you attribute the stock market to it?" Because Stability doesn't equal Stock Market, that's why. The National Security Law was implemented 4 years ago, what has today's stock market even got to do with the implementation of that law?
    4
  7565.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "The HK market has been faring poorly since the Chinese government started destroying capitalism." Hong Kong's GDP grew by 4.1% year-on-year in real terms in the third quarter of 2023, how's that the result of capitalism being destroyed?
    4
  7566. If the leader has proven to be capable of leading the country, why not leave him in power longer, to maximise the benefits to China?
    4
  7567.  @noelborbon6155  Indeed. Polls also show that only a minority (5.6%) of the people of Taiwan seek independence and that the vast majority (87%) want the continuation of the status quo. It's Pelosi's visit that threatens to change the status quo, and the majority of Taiwan are opposed to changing the status quo.
    4
  7568. ​ @TacticalMayo  The end result is a multi-polar world, dominated by multiple voices, rather than the uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and its "allies").
    4
  7569.  @elwinchan9551  Back in December 2019, there was no actual indication of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus. The first human-to-human transmission case in China was confirmed on 20th Jan 2020 and that's when the government began implementing quarantine measures shortly after. Source: China confirms human-to-human transmission of coronavirus theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/20/coronavirus-spreads-to-beijing-as-china-confirms-new-cases (Dated to 21st Jan 2020) The coronavirus was still new to science at that time, so it wasn't yet confirmed that human-to-human transmission was possible until the investigation is over. The government is acting based on actual information gleamed from the ground, not rumors and hearsay.
    4
  7570.  @elwinchan9551  "if your house on fire burning, you will just keep quiet and pretend nothing happened. Your neighbor just need to be prepared." China announced the information as soon as possible (you think Chinese knew the impact of Covid-19 right away?) and our neighbours like Korea, Japan, and even faraway Singapore took precautions. But Western countries like US, UK, Italy, France, etc just ignored the warnings in Asia, and did not prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores.
    4
  7571. Agreed. Politicians in China find it difficult to enter government, but once in power, it's easy to enact change. Whereas politicians in USA find it easy to enter government, by once in power, it's difficult to enact change.
    4
  7572.  @jgirlLVR  President Xi Jinping actually proposed to extend the One Country, Two Systems to include Taiwan, which would mean the Taiwan is allowed to keep their government, while the mainland is allowed to keep ours, but Taiwan would be considered fully reunified with the mainland. But Taiwan rejected the One Country, Two Systems proposal and did not offer any counter proposal of their own.
    4
  7573. Well said. In my opinion, politics should be about doing what's right, not what's popular. Sometimes, the popular thing may not be right, and the right thing may not be popular. Democracy, it seems, is only interested in doing what's popular, not necessarily what's right. For example, Donald Trump rose to power by seducing gullible voters and preying on their feelings with false promises of making America great again and got voted into power, even when he has zero political experience whatsoever.
    4
  7574. Agreed. Actors are just actors after all, they aren't qualified politicians, political commentators, political analysts, or other such experts. They may lack the political knowledge, but they wield significant influence over their fan bases, what words come out of their mouths may be taken as gospel by their followers. Maybe (just maybe) America needs to take a page out of the Chinese government crackdown in the entertainment industry.
    4
  7575.  @John2r1  You said: "Secondly the only reason Taiwan is not Internationally recognized as it's own country despite the rest of the world refusing to recognized Chinese authority over the Taiwan Streight. Is simply that since the ROC has been pushing for independence . China has threatened war against any nation that recognizes Taiwan as a Nation." Congratulations, you've just proven that mainland China clearly exerts authority over Taiwan and stopped them from declaring independence, and that other countries have recognized this and acceded to the One China policy. What more needs to be said?
    4
  7576. It's the Yellow Peril and Red Scare at work.
    4
  7577.  @bartonlee3594  If you want to talk about prison populations then it's actually the United States that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate, and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity, that sometimes, the U.S government releases convicts on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons.
    4
  7578. Singapore has been ruled by authoritarian single-party PAP for its entire life as nation. The People's Action Party ruled Singapore for over 50 years and Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore founder) was dictator who jailed and exiled dissidents to his rule. Isn't similar to China, being ruled by CCP for 70 years?
    4
  7579.  @kelvinpang438  False statement? I never said anything about "elections" so how is my statement false? Look at North Korea and they hold elections where they vote for Kim Jong Un too isn't it?
    4
  7580.  @hamiorg  I have mixed feelings towards the Japanese. I do watch some Japanese anime and enjoy Japanese cuisine and culture, but I'm aware of the history of Imperial Japan and what they did to China. Imperial Japan committed numerous wartime atrocities like Nanjing Massacre, Unit 731, and "comfort women" issue. During the Nanjing Massacre, Japanese soldiers butchered Chinese men for sport, and held contests to see who could rack up the most kills. Chinese women were gangaped and killed, their naked bodies left exposed and mutilated, their private regions bayoneted or having sharp sticks of bamboo shoved in. The young and elderly weren't spared, and Japanese soldiers sliced open the bodies of babies to do them. Japanese forced families to perform acts of incense; Sons were forced to do their mothers and fathers to daughters. Pregnant women were gangaped and had their swollen bellies stabbed, the unborn fetus torn from their wombs and bayoneted right before their eyes. This is the tragic history of what Imperial Japan did to China. I mean, what did Chinese do to deserve this? All we wanted was to to defend our lands and protect our homes and loved ones from the Japanese invaders, who stole our lands, plundered our wealth, killed our men and gangaped our women.
    4
  7581.  @MarkYeung1  The vote result was two against and three abstained, out of 2,964 votes. Also, there are Western democracies whose leaders have no term limits, such as Australia, Canada, Germany and New Zealand, so are you saying that these countries aren't democracies?
    4
  7582.  @abbotsful  Guantanamo Bay Detention Center is an example of false imprisonment and ongoing torture.
    4
  7583.  @infernobat8325  "神州 Shenzhou thier actions says otherwise." What's actions are you talking about?
    4
  7584.  @MarkYeung1  Hey mark, during the British coronation, there were British protestors that were against the monarchy, chanting "Not My King". After all, Charles wasn't elected by the British people, despite Britain being a democracy. Yet the British police arrested those protestors for speaking out? ... (Come to think of it, even Rishi Sunak wasn't elected by the British people.)
    4
  7585. Modern China was built by sweat, blood, tears and sacrifice of Chinese people to turn China from war torn, dirt poor and starving country, into an economic power protected by world's largest land army. 30 years ago, nobody envisioned Communist China to ever succeed, and expected China to collapse following the Soviet Union dissolution. But today, China is leading in building infrastructure all over the world.
    4
  7586. Zelenskyy himself is Jewish, so I'd imagine that the Azov Battalion, given their ideology, would have no qualms about taking him out if he surrenders Ukraine in the end. That would be taken as an act of betrayal by those neo-Nazis.
    4
  7587.  @KingKong-lb3vh  Why are you suddenly bringing up Uighurs and Tibetans?
    4
  7588.  @slovackoinfo  In fact, you never actually explained how the West developed China at all. If you want to know who really developed China, it was the Chinese government. Western companies were allowed to set up shop in China only if they agreed to transfer technology to China (or alternatively, agreed to partner up with at least one local Chinese company). So it was this government condition that allowed China to acquire the skills to develop our country, it wasn't the West that developed China.
    4
  7589. +Parm Mohan Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongolian Kublai Khan conquered Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China and made them part of his Yuan dynasty China. That was long before Westerners even arrived on the shores of America.
    4
  7590. Majority of Russia's losses were in the early days of the military operation, where vulnerabilities in transporting supplies could be exploited by the Ukraine forces. But now that the military routine has been established, Russian forces are slowly closing in on Ukraine forces and grinding them down.
    4
  7591. Denethor Palantir Chinese firewall only block access to websites Facebook and Youtube, but that does not mean Chinese people are not allowed to access such websites. Like you said, they can use VPNs to access such websites, and VPNs are still legal in China.
    4
  7592. I have met many of those anti-China people who always use the same old excuse of "I'm not anti-China, I'm just anti-CPC" to defend themselves and justify their anti-China stance. But the truth is that they don't care about China's interests, nor do they actually want to see China succeed that's all.
    4
  7593.  @shivambansals  "神州 Shenzhou IOC video call is Chinese propaganda.." If you want to claim that, then WTA is Western anti-China propaganda, attempting to politicize sports when Peng Shuai is clearly fine and just wants her personal privacy, after her previous affair with a much older man has been exposed.
    4
  7594. +Xentradi97 About China's one-party system, at least with such a system the party can remain in power and concentrate on making long-term plans for China. The CCP has made many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 15-year plans, 20-year plans to map out China's future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc and to set specific goals to achieve by then. Furthermore, CCP abolished the presidential term limit, so that the president can remain in power to see his plans to fruition. But in US two-party systems, the two parties constant fight one another instead of for America's future, and each side blames the other for all of America's woes. The US president can only make short-term plans, because after 4-8 years, he will be forced to step down after his presidential term ends. Making long-term plans spanning 10 or more years is simply impossible for USA. Where do you imagine USA will be in 10 years time? How about 20 years into the future? You can't tell, because US presidents will have to step down and hand the reins to the next US president. What if the next US president starts cancelling/reversing the previous president's reforms?
    4
  7595.  @JimmyDoyel-by2cp  Proving for negative? Clearly, ZeTristan is the one insinuating that I'm being paid to post comments here. Yet instead of asking ZeTristan for proof, you're making me do as he wants?
    4
  7596.  @GabrielEddy  神州 Shenzhou Prove to me that Taiwan still maintains that eleven-dash line claim. Because they don’t. After evacuating to Taiwan in 1949, the ROC government continued to claim the eleven-dash line and it remains as the rationale for the Chinese Republic's claims to the Spratly and Paracel Islands. President Lee Teng-hui stated that "legally, historically, geographically, or in reality", all of the South China Sea and Spratly islands were ROC territory and under ROC sovereignty, and denounced actions undertaken there by Malaysia and the Philippines. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Nine-dash line.)
    4
  7597.  @wally6193  If Western MSM continues to paint China as the enemy, then why should China paint the West as a friend?
    4
  7598.  @wally6193  Anti-China sentiment is growing in Australia, even though Australia is located closer to Asia than America and China is Australia's biggest trading partner. Yet Australian politicians like Scott Morrison are fanning the flames of racism against China and following US's anti-China stance.
    4
  7599.  @wally6193  About Religion in China, China has nearly 200 million religious believers and more than 380,000 clerical personnel. The five major religions practiced in China are Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism, and Protestantism. China has over 20 million Muslims, more than 57,000 clerical personnel. There are around 222,000 Buddhist clerical personnel and over 40,000 Taoist clerical personnel. Catholicism and Protestantism have 6 million and 38 million followers in China, respectively, with 8,000 and 57,000 clerical personnel. There are approximately 5,500 religious groups in China, including seven national organizations which are Buddhist Association of China, Chinese Taoist Association, China Islamic Association, Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association, Bishops’ Conference of Catholic Church in China, National Committee of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement of the Protestant Churches in China, and China Christian Council. Source: nation.com.pk/03-Apr-2018/china-has-over-20-million-muslims-35-000-mosques
    4
  7600.  @valenrn8657  "神州 Shenzhou Your ignorance of ""it was inhabited by various peoples" hides your side's imperialist past." Again, whoever the inhabitants were, you've already admitted that Han Dynasty Emperor Wu (r. 141–87 BC) had wrested control over Xinjiang, and that this was before Christ was born. So why are you talking about the inhabitants, when the fact was that the territory of Xinjiang was part of China since before Christ was born?
    4
  7601.  @valenrn8657  You said: "My point: China's current territorial issues have their origins BEFORE the US being a superpower." So if you accept that the US is entitled to rule the 50 states of USA (including Hawaii) then why can't you accept China's claims to Xinjiang, Tibet, etc, which have been part of China for longer than the entire colonial history of the USA?
    4
  7602.  @qqyoung2899  Low birth rates in the West? Doing something good? The fact is that Islam is spreading in the predominantly Christian Western countries, simply because their governments let Muslims do whatever they want. Caucasian Christian families are becoming smaller, because of lower birth rates and higher divorce rates (higher than Muslims anyway) all the while, Muslim immigrants are flooding the West, and they're bringing their huge families (especially if they have 4 wives) to those Western countries. Video: U.S. Muslim population to double by 2030 youtube.com/watch?v=vSGNybMDTgI Furthermore, non-Muslims have to convert to Islam if they marry a Muslim, whereas being Christian is a matter of personal choice. How are you doing them a good thing, by letting Muslims do whatever they want inside your country? The West is slowly being taken over by Muslims, and there's nothing you can do about it, because Western governments are letting Muslims do whatever they want inside your countries.
    4
  7603.  @qqyoung2899  "What right do you have to re-educate them? .... I believe China could make a law for compulsory school attendance (if they don't already have one)." You literally just contradicted yourself here. On one hand, you don't want re-education, and on the other hand, you want compulsory school attendance? Which one is it? Compulsory education or not education? Uighurs are in Xinjiang and Xinjiang is part of China yes, so what's wrong with them learning to speak Mandarin as well as write Chinese characters? What's wrong with Chinese teaching Uighurs patriotic songs? Don't Westerners also teach their kids to sing their own national anthem, so how different is that from what China is doing here? And yes, China has compulsory education, but the problem is that Xinjiang is so far from Eastern China, so some Uighur parents may choose not to send their kids to school. Why can't China get rid of "extreme elements of thinking"? China does not want Xinjiang to suddenly declare independence so what's wrong with teaching Uighurs that they are part of Chinese national identity?
    4
  7604. @ELIANA GLEN SARMIENTO Chinese President Xi Jinping has pledged to waive debts for the least developed African countries that have both high debt burdens and diplomatic ties with China. Speaking at the opening of a summit with African leaders in Beijing, Xi said his country would offer an extra $US60 billion ($83 billion) in financing to African countries. Source: China waives debt, promises 'no imposition of will' on African nations smh.com.au/world/asia/china-waives-debt-promises-no-imposition-of-will-on-african-nations-20180904-p501nr.html "In addition, for Africa's least developed countries, heavily indebted and poor countries, landlocked developing countries and small island developing countries that have diplomatic relations with China, the debt they have incurred in the form of interest-free Chinese government loans due to mature by the end of 2018 will be exempted," Xi said.
    4
  7605. Those dystopian futures were envisioned by writers and authors of fiction, whose primary goal is to exaggerate the negative effects of technology, governments, etc, for entertainment purposes and to attract readership/viewership of their novels and movies. But because they are works of fiction, it does not necessarily mean that what transpires in them will happen in reality as well.
    4
  7606. What is the definition of "developing nation"? Low GDP per capital? Low level of access to safe drinking water? High level of pollution? High number of road accidents? If so, then China is developing nation isn't it?
    4
  7607. In geopolitics there is no such thing as everlasting friendship. Overnight, friends can become enemies and vice versa. Saudi Arabia cooperated with the U.S when it was in the kingdom's interests, but as geopolitical situations change, long-time alliances may change as well. Saudi Arabia can sense that the West is in decline and the East is rising, and is calibrating its policies accordingly.
    4
  7608.  @peterruane9220  Hong Kong was historically part of China before it was made into a British colony after the Opium Wars and it's only after the 1997 handover that Hong Kong was returned to China. Whereas Singapore was never part of China throughout its history.
    4
  7609. ​ @jonathanhe7676  Dude, didn't you wrote this comment on another thread by @Servant to all "@I Nan Liu Just because America is a horrible sole superpower doesn’t mean every sole superpower is destined to be as horrible. For millennia, China was the sole power of East Asia, and they never caused destruction on the scale of the American empire."
    4
  7610. +Kya Bidu bas kya Russia helped India make Brahmos, yet you still discredit Russia and claim all of the credit for India?
    4
  7611.  @koblongata  "only China can stop Russia's invasion but chose not to." China has repeatedly called for peaceful dialogue to settle the issue. China is sending humanitarian aid to Ukraine, whereas the United States is sending lethal aid like Stinger missiles and Javelin rocket launchers which is only going to prolong the war instead of stopping it. Furthermore, once the conflict is over, those weapons might end up on the black market and fall into the hands of Ukrainian ultra-nationalists who might use the weapons to shoot down EU planes after being disillusioned with NATO's abandonment of Ukraine.
    4
  7612.  @ryanshiflett2178  "神州 Shenzhou It doesn't matter what Russia perceives to be true, that is separate from reality." Again, the fact that you so casually just dismiss Russia's position just goes to show how much Putin's words have fallen on deaf ears, because of the Western hubris towards Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. You want to know the reality? The reality is that Donetsk and Lugansk were already independent republics (that's reality yes) before Russia even declared them independent, and Ukrainian ultra-nationalist continued shelling of Donbas is perceived by Russia as an attack on two independent republics (much like Germany's attack on Poland was viewed as such by the Allies). So instead of limiting the battle to Donbas region, Moscow is taking the fight to Kiev, in very much the same way the Allies took the fighting to Germany instead of limiting it to Poland where Germany attacked. You said: "By taking Russia's position (a flawed position), you have now moved the goalposts (in other words, you've committed a logical fallacy) and constructed a flawed argument." How have I moved the goalpost by taking Russia's position? Do you actually have proof that Russia's position is flawed? Russia perceived Ukraine joining NATO as an existential threat to it's existence, because NATO would be able to move missiles and deploy soldiers to Russia's doorstep, very much the same way the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis posed an existential threat to USA through the Soviet deployment of missiles to Cuba. Many applauded President Kennedy for his refusal to back down and eventually the Soviets withdrew their missiles, so Putin also perceives Ukraine joining NATO as an existential threat much like Soviet missiles in Cuba posed to USA.
    4
  7613.  @koblongata  "Chinese state media is pretty much in sync with Russia's stage media, blaming NATO eastward expansion for Russian invasion, while ignoring the fact that it's really Russia that has been constantly forcefully expanding westwards for the past decades." NATO has been expanding eastwards into 13 countries but where has Russia been constantly forcefully expanding westwards for the past decades? Could you name a country that Russia expanded into westwards in the past decades?
    4
  7614. @UCyRXng9S48e9VJzpTLveAMw "Last I heard, the Taiwanese government does not officially claim the Chinese Mainland as their own territory anymore, even it might still be in their constitution." Well, why didn't Taiwan put that down in their constitution? Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, that means by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. You said: "I'm not sure about their current position on the South China Sea, though, but It wouldn't surprise me if they also claimed this like the Chinese Mainland does," Taiwan still maintains the claim the South China Sea under the Republic of China's 🇹🇼 11-Dash Line published in 1947. The People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 modified the claim by removing 2 dashes and arriving at the 9-Dash Line. You said: "I think it's pretty clear by now that Hong Kong does not really have a One government, Two Systems policy anymore after what Beijing recently did to Hong Kong with the so-called Hong Kong National Security Law after it bypassed Hong Kong's approval." How? Hong Kong clearly have their own Hong Kong government separate from the mainland government in Beijing, how doe the One Country, Two System policy not apply anymore? Every state has a National Security Law of their own, even the USA employed their National Security Law during the Capitol Hill riots. According to Hong Kong's Basic Law Article 23 (香港基本法第二十三條) states that Hong Kong shall enact laws to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government (aka Beijing) so the Hong Kong National Security Law was a long time coming in preventing any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against Beijing. You said: "The only people anyone can vote for are those who Beijing has approved of, not the Hong Kong people themselves." That's in accordance with Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條) which states that: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." So clearly, the Central People's Government (aka Beijing) reserves the right to appoint Hong Kong's Chief Executive as per Article 45. You said: "I'm not saying it would be an military invasion of one country by another, I'm saying it would be a military invasion of one democratically elected government by a non-democratically elected government," This is getting weird, how can a government invade another government? It's countries that invade each other, but since Taiwan is part of China (as per both Taiwan and the mainland's constitution) then that means China is not invading ourselves, if anything, it would be a resumption of the previously stalled Chinese Civil War fought by between the Nationalist KMT and the Communists.
    4
  7615.  @jayshon1348  Why are you comparing China to Nazis? China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Chad, Sudan, Nigeria, Kenya, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Ghana, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, etc, even in the 21st century. The USA is bombing those countries (Iraq Body Count Project reported some 200,000 Iraqi civilian casualties) and enacting regime change by cutting off those country's "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Trump just narrowly avoided starting a fresh war with Iran.
    4
  7616.  @MarkYeung1  I for one am glad that those trouble makers were either arrested or they have left Hong Kong altogether. You and I both agree that rioters who broke the laws ought to be punished accordingly. As for Hong Kongers who remained in Hong Kong, they are the ones who care the most about Hong Kong. Those that remain in Hong Kong are the ones that will bring prosperity to Hong Kong by remaining behind to build up the city.
    4
  7617.  @MarkYeung1  If you're referring to Hong Kong, then according to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條): "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." - Article 45, Hong Kong Basic Law. Therefore, Beijing (aka the Central People's Government) reserves the right to appoint the Hong Kong Chief Executive as per Hong Kong Basic Law.
    4
  7618.  @thulsadoom544  Wolf Warriors? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    4
  7619.  @DK-ev9dg  Nope, why would I be jealous of that? It's their loss and their choice to withdraw from Russia.
    4
  7620. The bat soup coronavirus origins myth have long been debunked by experts. Source: Is bat soup a delicacy in China? We debunk a rumour on the origin of the coronavirus observers.france24.com/en/20200203-china-coronavirus-bat-soup-debunk-videos-viral-palau-indonesia
    4
  7621. Nobody force you to buy clothing from China if you don't want to. Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, toys, clothing, sneakers, etc, cheaply, so that the cost of living is lower in other countries. Think of the millions of dollars people have saved on living expenses thanks to affordable Chinese goods.
    4
  7622. They answer only to their sponsors (i.e the miltary-industrial complex) , so they do not see the need to be more open minded about other countries.
    4
  7623. Well said. Some of the Hong Kong protestors are high school kids who haven't even graduated from school yet they already think they know how to best govern Hong Kong. Their teenage minds haven't even matured yet they already gotten swept up by political fervor at such a young, idealistic age.
    4
  7624. China's automotive industry is already the world's largest by number of cars being produced, surpassing Japan and Korea long ago. Even in other transportation fields, such as high-speed railway, China has the world's largest high speed railway network, surpassing Japan's Shinkansen in terms of track length, even when China was initially behind Japan in the past.
    4
  7625. wisdomleader2017 Likewise, has China ever claimed any Western technology and inventions to be China's own, without giving credits? When did China ever claimed to have invented high speed rail technology?
    4
  7626. wisdomleader2017 Could you provide a link for your claim that China's national media disseminates information claiming credit for Western inventions? I have shown historically that people have improved upon the designs of other people's original inventions and that's how society has progressed as a whole. It's your choice if you don't believe me, but why do you impose expectations on to me for your beliefs?
    4
  7627. wisdomleader2017 You asked me earlier for a link, and I provided mine, so can't I ask you for a link to support your claim as well? Who says I'm asking it for an predominantly English speaking audience of this channel/video to verify it? As for fairness and trade, I already shown that USA is the world's most protectionist country so how is fairness of trade important here?
    4
  7628.  @TheSkult  Orwell's 1984 is a work of fiction, and the author deliberately choose negative scenario of surveillance system in order to attract readership and it doesn't mean reality will follow in its example. And frankly speaking, what's wrong with having massive surveillance system, advanced facial recognition software and the Social Credit System? Westerners often complain Chinese are rude, spit in public, smoke in public, jaywalk, disobey traffic rules, speed through red lights, when not all Chinese are like that. The government hopes to be able to use technology to catch these people and discourage such behavior by penalizing their score. But if they persist with bad behavior, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and become a nuisance in other countries. At least until their scores improve to become acceptable for them to travel again.
    4
  7629. The US barred China from the International Space Station, so in the end, China launched our very own space station into orbit.
    4
  7630. +Adityaa Chaubey According to you example, what happens if Jackie Chan suddenly becomes richest man on earth? The fault in the treaty lies with the wording at that moment in time, so how can it be accurate? On the other hand, Mount Gipmochi is an absolute, mentioned in the treaty, so why isn't it recognized? So if India claims that the treaty cancels itself, then it has no right to claim Batang La as the tri-junction, based on the 1st verse of the treaty. If India chooses not to recognize the treaty, then what right does it have to refer to the 1st verse in the treaty for its claims? If India designates Batang La as the tri-junction, then why wasn't China consulted, or even informed of such an important change in tri-junction? You are the one insulting me and looking down on me. I don't insult you but you have called me a fool and constantly ridicule me with your words.
    4
  7631.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. don't know and I don't care. That is for my leader to care." You don't even know who's going to be your leader this November. You think Biden knows anything about chip making, the logistics, the materials, manpower, machinery, maintenance? Or Trump or Kamala for that matter? You said: "I am not here to discuss about that." Why'd you even bring up TMSC building a chip plant in Arizona in the first place, if you're not here to discuss that?
    4
  7632.  @godwinmarvo9012  You asked: "Hey how much is china paying you to spread it's propaganda?" Cyrus Janssen's videos are all about the peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" so if you're claiming that he's spreading the Communist Party's message, then isn't this a positive message for the world? It's no secret today that U.S - China relations have deteriorated to their lowest levels in recent years and the possibility of a hot war breaking out between US and China would not only be bad for both our countries, but for the rest of the world as well.
    4
  7633.  @gulamog5041  You said: "神州 Shenzhou 90% of Taiwanese voted for Taiwan independence." Alright, then why don't Taiwan formally declare independence? Where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? If not, then since there's no amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    4
  7634.  @gulamog5041  You said: "did you know that Mao Zedong killed billions of Chinese people?" Billions? You mean 1,000,000,000s? But China's current population is 1,400,000,000, so you're saying Chairman Mao killed more people than there are people in China today?
    4
  7635.  @petersinclair3997  Taiwan was part of China since Qing Dynasty. Look up the Map of Qing Dynasty and Taiwan was part of their territory.
    4
  7636.  @almondcaeser9587  This is what you wrote earlier: "神州 Shenzhou tell me whether china has taken sri lankan land on lease for 99 years due to debt trap. you might not know but China has given lots of loans to Sri lanka to make unnecessary projects such as development of ports which can't generate any income." Then you wrote: "Taking Hambantota for 99 years on lease, China can use that port for their thousands of ships of different countries travelling from Europe, both americas and Africa to China which will generate hundreds of billions and maybe many trillions over the course of 99 years business." So aren't you contradicting your earlier own words here?
    4
  7637.  @almondcaeser9587  So in other words, you're saying that the Hambantota Deal actually benefits Sri Lanka, since it will let Chinese develop the port to generate income to the country? As well as by accepting the 99-year lease, Sri Lankan government no longer has to pay the $1.2 billion in Chinese debt? And the fact that once the lease expires after 99 years, the port will be returned to Sri Lanka and the debt considered fully repaid? Then what debt-trap are you talking about? Sri Lanka and China both inked out a win-win deal over Hambantota port.
    4
  7638.  @almondcaeser9587  "But if you are living in Vietnam or Phillipines who have territorial issues then going with US is better" During the Vietnam War, the Americans literally dropped napalm bombs over Vietnamese villages and burnt them to the ground. The U.S soldiers sprayed chemical defoliants like Agent Orange that cause birth defects in Vietnamese kids even till today, how is US a better choice? And the Americans fought against the Philippines during the American-Philippine War, so how is Philippine going with USA better?
    4
  7639.  @firmaith  Well, if the Chinese government is able to meet the so-called "low expectations" of Chinese compared to the U.S government able to meet the "high expectations" of Americans, then China is more a democracy than the U.S.A. Because the Chinese government is able to deliver what the people want, where the American government isn't able to.
    4
  7640.  @firmaith  "神州 Shenzhou interesting interpretation. Not sure where your getting your 51% statistic." I'm just spitballing the statistic. In a two-party system, the vote primarily goes to either the Republicans and the Democrats (independents are unable to garner the majority vote). Whichever party wins only has partial representation of American interests (say 51% which might be even lower, maybe even 1%. So America is ostensibly a plutocracy for the 1%, not a democracy for the 99%.
    4
  7641.  @firmaith  "神州 Shenzhou meeting low expectations doesn’t mean more democracy," Meeting expectations (whether high or low) means that the people's will is being carried out; that the government is able to meet expectations of its people, and China's government is succeeding in this case. But the fact that American's expectations are not being met by their government, seems to suggest that U.S is ostensibly less democratic than China, since one definition of democracy is a government of the people, by the people, for the people.
    4
  7642.  @firmaith  There is more responsiveness in local governments because the provincial governments are responsible for their respective regions (i.e Shanghai, Wuhan, etc) and in carrying out policies and achieving short-term goals. Whereas the central government is responsible for all of China, and in charting out China's course and direction, making long-term plans for China's future in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc. Together, the two governments (i.e central and local) work together to drive policy forward. When local governments encounter problems that threaten to cause problems for the rest of China (i.e Wuhan outbreak, Shanghai outbreak), then sometimes the central government steps in and assumes responsibility (like during Wuhan outbreak). For example, lockdowns in Shanghai are regrettable, but the central government is responsible for all of China like I said, so the central directive of lockdown takes priority over the wants of the people of Shanghai.
    4
  7643.  @firmaith  "神州 Shenzhou just because it’s not delivering what I want, doesn’t mean it’s not delivering for other factions." The problem is that the U.S system is delivering for a small faction that represents only 1%, not the 99% of American population. The Americans are following the democratic procedures of voting at elections and changing their government, but time and time again, the U.S government just isn't delivering what the majority of Americans themselves want. So can America be called a true democracy when it is for the 1% and not the 99%?
    4
  7644.  @MarkYeung1  But China is not the United States, then why should China follow the United States in this regard? This is precisely the sort of colonial mentality, thinking that all countries HAVE to become like the U.S. You as an individual may not be happy but many people in China are satisfied with the current level of access to the Internet.
    4
  7645. China publishes more scientific research papers than any other in the world. For the first time, China has overtaken the United States in terms of the total number of science publications, according to statistics compiled by the US National Science Foundation (NSF). Source: China declared world’s largest producer of scientific articles nature.com/articles/d41586-018-00927-4 The agency’s report, released on 18 January, documents the United States’ increasing competition from China and other developing countries that are stepping up their investments in science and technology.
    4
  7646. 太好笑了。。。呵呵呵
    4
  7647. +Debabrata Choudhury Not possible? Then why you expect China to turn our back on our friend Pakistan just for India's sake? In 1959, Indian PM Nehru choose to provide asylum to 14th Dalai Lama, which makes China suspicious of Indian intent already.
    4
  7648.  @nuwa1737  Show me video of wearing Hanfu in Taiwan as compared to wearing Hanfu in the mainland. Video: Hanfu, the Chinese traditional costume chased by the young youtu.be/7v_DGXtQ110
    4
  7649.  @nuwa1737  Here's video Uighur traditional dance in Kashgar, Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region. What suppression are you talking about? Video: New life for ancient city of Kashgar youtu.be/IrvaeJ5y8lI?t=20
    4
  7650.  @MarkYeung1  Every state has their own National Security Law to prohibit sedition, secession and foreign interference, even the USA have their own National Security Law. According to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 (香港基本法第二十三條), Hong Kong shall enact laws to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government, or theft of state secrets, to prohibit foreign political organizations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region, and to prohibit political organizations or bodies of the Region from establishing ties with foreign political organizations or bodies. So the Hong Kong National Security Law was a long time coming, given that it was supposed to be done according to Basic Law Article 23.
    4
  7651. Indeed. His words are designed to sound like music to the MAGA audience. But the reality is that he continues the US foreign policy.
    4
  7652.  @clauderose6333  "神州 Shenzhou Oh, did you forgot how to read Chinese characters in jail? She wrote '晚饭后我也不愿意', it means 'she was unwanted afrer dinner'." Peng Shuai was describing the cold attitude of Zhang Gaoli's wife towards her, making her feel unwanted. But this phrase you quoted doesn't translate to sexual assault. "She also wrote '那天下午我原本没有同意一直哭', it means 'she was unwilling in that afternoon and she's crying'. you guess, is that a charge of raping?" Yes but later Peng Shuai consented to sex, this is what she wrote: "晚饭后我也并不愿意,你说恨我!又说你这七年从未忘记过我,会对我好等 等...我又怕又慌带着七年前对你的情感同意了。是的就是我们发生性关系了。感情这东西很复杂, 说不清,从那日后我再次打开了对你的爱," which translates to "After dinner, I was still not willing to have sex. You said you hated me. You said in those seven years, you never forgot about me, and you will treat me well etc... I was terrified and anxious. Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you." So according to Peng Shuai's post, the sex was consensual then where are the allegations of sexual assault and charges of rape in her post?
    4
  7653. @Unbroken You claimed that "China loosed this virus upon the world," then why the heck would China even release this so-called bioweapon in Wuhan City of all places? This would kill our people and damage our economy, not to mention it will make other countries point their fingers at China, so why would China release this virus inside Wuhan? And if China loosed this virus upon the world, why did China deliberately lockdown Wuhan (a city of 11 million) in a bid to contain the spread of the coronavirus? Why would China inform the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia-like illness on 31st Dec 2019? It's almost as if you're just blaming China for your country's inability to handle the Covid-19 pandemic that's all, and making China into a convenient scapegoat.
    4
  7654.  @jiaxinchen6467  New Zealand themselves follow a zero covid policy (they entered lockdown after detecting 1 covid case). Yet the reason NZ is not sending diplomats to the Olympics is because of covid concerns, even though China has the same zero covid policy.
    4
  7655.  @Andy-P  "Do people have secure property rights in China....." An excerpt from an article about home ownership in China: Today China is a country of homeowners with more than 90% of households owning homes (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations (Huang et al., 2020). This achievement is particularly impressive and is in sharp contrast to the recent decline of homeownership rate in the U.S., Western Europe and other developed countries. ... (Source: National Institutes of Health)
    4
  7656.  @Andy-P  "I unlike you think China is becoming more like N Korea than China under Deng." According to Global Trade Alert, the United States is the world's most protectionist country, implementing more than 800 protectionist measures while the EU has over 300 protectionist policies. China only has 200-300 of such measures in comparison. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Protectionism)
    4
  7657.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou Saudi and may other countries are successful because of primary resources." So it supports my argument that a country doesn't have to become democratic to be successful. I rest my case then.
    4
  7658.  @Andy-P  The New Lens: Taiwan’s Wages Are So Low Because Business Profits Are Too High.
    4
  7659.  @Andy-P  But if you read the article, it says that Taiwan’s labor unions are calling for an even bigger increase, to at least NT$26,000, which will compensate for their lost income in 2021 as a result of the negligible increase of NT$200. Even if the government agrees, NT26,000 still barely meets Taiwan’s basic living expenses.
    4
  7660. Not many Western articles want to acknowledge China's digital Renminbi.
    4
  7661. The Chinese government have put forward many 5-year plan, 10-year plan, 15-year plan, 20-year plan, and so on, to map out China's future and to set specific goals to achieve by 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc. This whole Belt and Road Initiative is expected to take many decades (if not a century) to complete and requires great planning and foresight to pull off. But the problem with the West is that they only plan short-term (such as 4-8 years for USA) because there is no guarantee that their government will remain in power for more than a decade, so they make short-term plans that expire once their term is over. Their long term plans get disrupted, such as when Obama planned the Trans Pacific Partnership for 8 years, but when Trump came to power, he cancelled the TPP, simply because Trump didn't like Obama (Obama humiliated him with his birth certificate).
    4
  7662.  @Ahsar_bek  Agreed. Family values are important and Chinese philosopher Confucius places emphasis on respect for elders. Not only does China share the same family values as Russia, but also India, Pakistan and most of the developing world as well. The modern Western liberal values can be seen as almost "alien" to the rest of the world.
    4
  7663. China is catching up to USA in many fields. Already, China is home to world's fastest supercomputer, Sunway Taihu Light 神威·太湖之光 and in a survey of Top 500 fastest supercomputers in the world, China had 202 out of 500 compared to US having 169 out of 500. Source: China beats US in Top500 supercomputers cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/
    4
  7664.  @night6724  Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine, which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    4
  7665.  @dflatt1783  "神州 Shenzhou Nice articulation. It doesn't change actions." Cyrus Janssen actions are that he's fighting for peace, by promoting understanding and cooperation between the US and China. It's warmongers like @NE0 GE0 that are fighting for war, so why fault Cyrus when clear his message is better for US-China relations? It would be in the rest of the world's interests if China and USA have good relations, isn't it?
    4
  7666.  @David-og7di  You said: "So this guy is in Vancouver but is advocating for changes in US policy." Why not? Cyrus Janssen is an American Citizen, is he not? And he can clearly see that US-China relations are heading in a bad direction towards war, then can't he promote peace by advocating for changes in the U.S warmongering policy?
    4
  7667.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  "I don't own shares in any Chinese arms manufacturers.. I wish I could...The profits would be huge" China is currently at peace at not at war with any country since our last major conflict in 1979, how would there be huge profit in Chinese arms given the sheer lack of any conflict? On the other hand, the U.S military industrial complex is making huge profits at the expense of ordinary American tax payers, by waging wars in the Middle East. Didn't Joe Biden abandoned billions of dollars of U.S military equipment in Kabul to the Taliban when USA withdrew from Afghanistan? That's equipment paid for by American taxpayers to U.S arms manufacturers.
    4
  7668.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  "Cyrus is banging on about investing in Chinese stocks. Great idea. Didi and Alibaba just shat themselves." Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why American monopolies like Facebook, Amazon, Google, Apple, dominate their respective industries and eliminated/gobbled up competition from smaller American companies in the same fields. China has anti-monopoly law cracking down on anti-competitive practices in Alibaba, Tencent and Didi, "freeing up market space" so that smaller Chinese companies can emerge to compete in the market.
    4
  7669.  @gulamog5041  Comparing President Xi Jinping to Winnie the Pooh is basically a racist caricature, because you're comparing an Asian man to a yellow tone bear with small eyes.
    4
  7670.  @ayi3455  China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain out of millions in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them.
    4
  7671.  @ayi3455  Spain never refused, but China is NOT Spain then can't China refuse to use improper name of the coronavirus? The World Health Organization calls it Covid-19, then why are you using the improper name for the coronavirus? And Covid-19 cases were discovered in Italy and Spain before the outbreak in Wuhan, then can't China ask other countries today investigate the possible origins of Covid-19 in their lands? Even the U.S CDC tested American blood samples dating back to 13th December 2019 and found Covid-19 antibodies in patients blood. Since it takes up to 2 weeks to develop Covid-19 antibodies, this means that Covid-19 was present in USA much earlier than the outbreak in Wuhan.
    4
  7672.  @ayi3455  China allowed World Health Organization investigation team to visit Wuhan and their findings indicate that the coronavirus entered Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market from outside, and they all but dismissed the possibility of a lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. If Fort Detrick was really not the origins, then why not USA allow the WHO team to investigate Fort Detrick and put those rumours to rest? Unless the USA has something the USA has something to hide?
    4
  7673. Japan and SK have to deal with NK first.
    4
  7674. Actually, Bhutan hasn't officially produced any evidence that the territory even belongs to them yet, yet Indian government simply accepts it and send troops into Chinese territory.
    4
  7675. Duterte studied history of Philippines and know that American soldiers have killed many Philippines people during USA occupation of Philippines.
    4
  7676. +State Controlled Production Which part of my information is considered disinformation? There is real Philippine-American war, with American victory, resulting in American occupation of the Philippines and dissolution of the First Philippine Republic. The Philippines becomes an unincorporated territory of the United States and, later, a U.S. Commonwealth. Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine–American_War
    4
  7677. President Duterte also once said that while USA claims to support "justice", after Nicaragua case brought to International Court of Justice, the US withdrew from compulsory jurisdiction in 1986 to accept the court's jurisdiction only on a case-by-case basis. So apparently the ICJ's judgement doesn't apply to America as well.
    4
  7678.  @mojito4493  During the Chinese Civil War, why did the Nationalist Kuomintang 🇹🇼 with all their wealth, superior weapons and superior numbers, still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist 🇨🇳 peasants and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? Nobody expected the Communists to succeed, yet look at where mainland China is today, compared to Taiwan.
    4
  7679. America lost the Vietnam War, and did not win the Korean War.
    4
  7680. China first invented paper money. The rest of the world adopted it. Now China is rolling out digital currency. The rest of the world will eventually adopt it.
    4
  7681. What you described sounds remarkably similar to communism, where the proletariat (i.e Workers) own the means of production. The workers are their own bosses, they get to decide what to produce and what to do with the fruits of their labour and how to divide up the profits among themselves. Most of the world is capitalistic is where the means of production are controlled by the bourgeois (aka private owners) and capitalists constantly seek to shrink worker wages and prolong working hours in order to skim off a wider profit margin for themselves. A small group of people (i.e the board of directors) makes all the major decisions on what to produce, how to produce and what to do with the profits (which they mostly take for themselves) and the workers of the company have no say.
    4
  7682. For example, some Westerners like to complain about the Chinese government abolishing our president term limits. Well then, how do you expect to make long term plans far into the future, if your president has to step down after 4-8 years? China has many 5-year plan, 10-year plan, 20-year plan, 30-year plans set in motion, to map out our future and set goals to achieve by 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc. In contrast, American presidential term limits only allow US presidents to make short-term plans spanning 4-8 years at the most. After that, the president is forced to step down and your country can't plan longer than 10 years into the future. For example, can you imagine what America will be like in 10 years time? How about 20 years into the future? But for China, we have big plans that are already set in motion by our government.
    4
  7683.  @blitz12399  EACH YEAR? Where did you get your figures from? According to the Russian government, there are around 112,353 buildings (in 2022) that are deemed uninhabitable, but where does it say EACH YEAR that 150,000 homes in Russia become uninhabitable?
    4
  7684. ​ @blitz12399  The number of vacant homes in the US may be decreasing, but the number of homeless in the USA have increased by 12%.
    4
  7685.  @elektrotehnik94  My experience is that the United States is the worst, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. The U.S has done the same thing in Ukraine with the 2014 coup d'etat of Ukrainian President Yanukovych by USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in place. Since then, Ukraine has been supporting ultra-nationalists and neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion which been carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Luhansk and Donetsk (collectively known as Donbas). Over the course of 8 years, over 13,000 civilians have been killed by shelling by both sides in the Donbas region. Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that began in 2014.
    4
  7686. +Alpha Omega Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when Mongolian Kublai Khan conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China, and incorporated them into Yuan dynasty China. The Manchu people did the same thing centuries later and made Tibet part of Qing Dynasty China. So isn't Tibet part of China for longer than, say, the entire history of USA (colonization, genocide, industrialization, independence, etc) ?
    4
  7687. +Alpha Omega Vietnam also built islands of its own in South China Sea, then why USA ignore them and only pick on China?
    4
  7688.  @kellikelli4413  "神州 Shenzhou It's obvious that the excuse of "keeping seniors safe" is a lie meant to fool people..." Fool people for what? You think Chinese people don't care about the elderly, when it's part of traditional Confucian values?
    4
  7689.  @MarkYeung1  Also, you keep throwing around the word "immunized" but vaccination does not equal immunity, and people can still contract the viruse (like Cyrus did) even after being vaccinated. Please be informed before you spread information.
    4
  7690. The term "East Turkestan" is a fake name coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists (including Nikita Bichurin) who intended the name to replace the common Western term for the region, Chinese Turkestan. There was never historically such a country, it was just renaming of a Chinese region.
    4
  7691.  @MarkYeung1  Similar thing happened in Hong Kong. Previously, Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy while it was a British colony, yet Hong Kong was a prosperous port city under authoritarian rule. It's during the period of Hong Kong's 1997 handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote for their favorite leaders, under the One Country, Two Systems policy proposed by Beijing. But Hong Kong's economic growth became more modest after democracy was introduced. At the start of the handover, Hong Kong's GDP made up 18.4 percent, but in 2021, Hong Kong's GDP made up only 2.1 percent of mainland China's.
    4
  7692. You Westerners love to complain about Chinese people being rude, spitting in public, jaywalking, drive through red lights, etc, so Chinese government is taking a new approach to tackle such undesirable behavior by preventing such people from traveling overseas and being a menace to other countries.
    4
  7693.  @bartonlee3594  The latest news from 2 days ago is that Evergrande's creditors agreed to extend the deadline on domestic bonds. I've previously mentioned that Evergrande has resumed construction on 95% of its projects, but it appears you claim that those Evergrande 'homeowners' whose homes are paid for will never be built.
    4
  7694.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou I see your point." I try to quote articles to support my point, whereas all you seem to do is spout the same anti-China narrative all this time, without bothering to substantiate your point.
    4
  7695.  @MarkYeung1  About the so-called "invasion of Taiwan," go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of all the territory Taiwan claims (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Since there's been no amendments in Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution, so how can China invade our own country?
    4
  7696.  @RayCromwell  "神州 Shenzhou do Chinese conveniently forget the aid given to China against thr Japanese during WW2?" Much of that US aid ended up in the pockets of the Nationalist Kuomintang. The KMT had pocketed over $750,000,000 worth of U.S military aid, so much such that even the then US President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption, and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs, and the Soongs (were) all thieves." US President Harry S. Truman wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", having taken $750 million in US aid. https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuomintang
    4
  7697.  @jp95js  You said: "God help the world if a PLA Navy ship attacks a USA Navy in those water or even accidentally rams one." The US Navy warships have been colliding with merchant vessels in the South China Sea. For example, At 5:24 a.m. on 21 August 2017, USS John S. McCain, a United States Navy warship, was involved in a collision with the Liberian-flagged tanker Alnic MC off the coast of Singapore and Malaysia, east of the Strait of Malacca. Early on 17 June 2017, the United States Navy destroyer USS Fitzgerald collided with MV ACX Crystal, a Philippine-flagged container ship, about 80 nautical miles (150 kilometres; 92 miles) southwest of Tokyo, Japan; 10 nautical miles (19 km; 12 mi) southeast of the city of Shimoda on the Japanese mainland (Honshu). So if anything, isn't it more likely that the US warship will be the one colliding?
    4
  7698.  @jp95js  "神州 Shenzhou So what is the PLA going to do to stop those Foreign navies that just ignore Beijing's instructions on demanding to be notified and give approval to sail those water?" The USA can only send warships temporarily to the South China Sea but they are unable to halt Chinese constructing permanent islands and fortifying thdmin South China Sea. Imagine 10 years later, and China would have completed 10 years worth of island construction and fortifications, whereas USA would have completed 10 years worth of Navy patrols. But nothing solid to show for all their efforts. So what does all these US Navy patrols achieve in the long term? Nothing concrete isn't it? You said: "The USA just sold 70 billion dollars worth of armaments this year alone to Taipei." The USA just lost a 20-year war in Afghanistan against a bunch of insurgents, leaving behind over $80 billion dollars worth of U.S military hardware in Afghanistan for the Taliban. Once Taiwan eventually gets reunified with the mainland, all the US miltary equipment in Taiwan will transfer ownership to the mainland, given the US history of abandoning weapons.
    4
  7699.  @jp95js  I thought many Westerners often boast that Canada and America are free countries with freedom of speech, yet you're claiming Cyrus will get physically attacked just for saying positive things about China? Then how is there "freedom of speech" in Canada and the USA, if people aren't allowed to say positive things about China?
    4
  7700.  @MH-il1lk  " That's not how they feel." They call themselves Republic of China after all, so how is the island not a part of China?
    4
  7701.  @zilun  That's exactly why China always say "trade war will have no winners, only losers". Foreign businesses will suffer during trade war, USA will suffer, China will suffer, and global economies will suffer. But it was clearly USA who cast the first stone in this trade war, and China is not going to be the only one receiving punches, when push comes to shove, China will hit back with measures of our own.
    4
  7702. High risk = High reward, that's how life works.
    4
  7703.  @yslee1401  There are some Singaporean Chinese that buy in too much of the Western media's portrayal of China, and have grown up feel ashamed of mainland China. I suspect you are one of such people.
    4
  7704. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. In contrast, many Westerners (but not all) tend to be pessimistic and have a bleak outlook of the future.
    4
  7705. Meanwhile, US President Trump "stands with" Saudi Arabia, and defends Saudi Arabian Crown Prince from murder of journalist, even when CIA has actual proof of Crown Prince's involvement. Double standards much? Why CIA hasn't released proof of Meng committing crime before Canada arresting her?
    4
  7706.  @dinesh50448  About 5G, China has completed world's first 5G remote surgery in test on animal (Video:youtu.be/yFR61jjL1vo ) The doctor is located 50km away from the operating theatre and conducted the operation over a 5G network. China has successfully tested the world’s first remote-surgery equipment using 5G mobile network technology. In the January 8 procedure, a doctor in the southeastern province of Fujian removed the liver of a laboratory test animal at a remote location, by controlling robotic surgical arms over a 5G connection. The lag time lag was said to be only 0.1 seconds between the doctor’s control device and the robot in the surgical room. Researchers said the high-speed can reduce the risk of deadly medical mistakes, and raises hopes that 5G-enabled remote surgery will soon be reliable enough for use on human patients
    4
  7707.  @dinesh50448  "神州 Shenzhou ok, cure covid 5G tech but only on small countries" Video: Chinese doctors do remote COVID-19 diagnosis with 5G youtu.be/3mLNTbhXkHg Doctors in West China Hospital, Chengdu​ , SW China, have successfully used 5G​ technology to do a remote diagnosis of COVID-19 patients, particularly with the use of remote control CT scanners. This was the first time the method was used in China. According to doctors computer screens show scans of patients in a hospital over 700km away via remote diagnosis. A CT scan and a nucleic acid test are necessary tests for the coronavirus diagnosis.
    4
  7708.  @dinesh50448  Video: (Huawei isn't built on Chinese state funding youtu.be/HAffWwL1E-Q ) Huawei is employee-owned. 96,000 current and former staff own 100% of the company, that leaves exactly 0% in the hands of the Chinese government.
    4
  7709.  @jacwi8719  "US will stop the chip supplies and Korea will stop the storage and display." China might respond by stopping all rare earth metals production to the USA. All your technology like chips, screen displays, cameras, monitors, diodes, LEDS, LCD, light bulbs, solar panels, batteries, cell phones, lasers, fibre optics, superconductors, capacitors, jet engines, rocket circuitry, cars, ships, jetplanes, etc all cease to function without
    4
  7710.  @dinesh50448  China is currently a signatory of the Biological Weapons Convention, a disarmament treaty that effectively bans biological and toxin weapons by prohibiting their development, production, acquisition, transfer, stockpiling and use. Chinese officials have stated that China has never engaged in biological activities with offensive military applications Source: Biological Weapons Convention wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_Weapons_Convention What is the American Dream? The American Dream is that every American immigrant has equal opportunity to strike it rich someday and rise through the corporate ranks and become successful. However, USA is the only developed country whose bottom 50% of lower income families have been growing poorer over the last decades. What is the Chinese Dream? The Chinese Dream is the eventual rejuvenation of the Chinese civilization, to restore China from centuries of humiliation at the hands of foreigners, to become a moderately well-off country and a member of the global community.
    4
  7711.  @jacwi8719  Mainland China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing Taiwan's hi-speed rail (and even Japan's Shinkansen) in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours.
    4
  7712.  @Poseidon99Jeus  Does someone have to "look Japanese" to be considered beautiful?
    4
  7713.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  I had access to 2019 stats, then what's wrong with me using them? If others wish to find out the current statistics, they are more than welcome to do so.
    4
  7714. The U.S has plenty of battle experience waging wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, yet the battle-hardened U.S Army still lost the 20-year Afghan War against a bunch of insurgents and had to withdraw from Afghanistan. Furthermore, since the USSR dissolution, the U.S Army hasn't had actual combat experience with an opposing army of near-peer level (such as Russia or China)
    4
  7715. Russia and China are fighting to bring us toward a multi-lateral world dominated by multiple voices, while the USA is fighting to maintain control of the uni-lateral world dominated by USA's voice.
    4
  7716. Ask yourself, if U.S succeeds in transferring Taiwan's TSMC chip technology to Arizona, then isn't the island of no further use? What alliance will there be, once Taiwan's chip technology goes to U.S?
    4
  7717. Here's a Chinese analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family, which in turn would lead them right up to her ex-husband's doorstep. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    4
  7718. U.S logic: 1. There are no bio-labs in Ukraine. Period! 2. Those non-existent labs are for civilian use, definitely not military purposes. 3. If Russia gets their hands on those non-existent civilian labs, they will use the data to develop miltary bio weapons to deploy in false flag operations. No doubt about it! 4. Profit.
    4
  7719.  @Legacy241  China's infrastructure construction is arguably the best in the world and we are home to many of the world's longest and highest bridges. For example: List of highest bridges wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest_bridges#Completed_bridges List of longest bridges wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest_bridges#Completed List of longest suspension bridge spans wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest_suspension_bridge_spans#Completed_suspension_bridges List of longest masonry arch bridge spans wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest_masonry_arch_bridge_spans List of longest arch bridge spans wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest_arch_bridge_spans#Completed_bridges List of longest cable-stayed bridge spans wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest_cable-stayed_bridge_spans#Completed_cable-stayed_bridges China found success through infrastructure construction and we are merely offering the same path to success to other developing countries.
    4
  7720.  @Legacy241  Here's a video of modern day Lhasa, Tibet, China (filmed by WildFilmsIndia) and you can see how developed Lhasa has become under communist party rule. Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, and modern technology like cars, telephone cables, computers, smartphones, WiFi, the Internet, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo (By WildFilmsIndia) Even the poorest Tibetan farmer can afford a smartphone, connect to the Internet and shop online in Taobao and have his purchases shipped all the way to Tibet in the Himalayas. Because Tibet is part of China after all. You're the one who constantly thinks the worst of China here, it's like you think China can do no good at all.
    4
  7721.  @NoComplience  You realize that jameslee was being sarcastic when he wrote: "China is collapsing, collapsing and collapsing.... LOL" right?
    4
  7722. Victoria Nuland on Bio Labs in Ukraine youtu.be/fvRpntmUIxs
    4
  7723.  @mojito4493  Chiang kai-Shek even served in the Japanese Army from 1909 to 1911. He purged communists from KMT and their removal of Communists from within the ranks allowed him free reign to give himself what amounted to dictatorial power over much of China. Source: 11 Things You Should Know About Chiang Kai-shek https://theculturetrip.com/asia/taiwan/articles/11-things-know-chiang-kai-shek/ When the Japanese invaded Manchuria, Chiang refused to face the Japanese invaders, until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap him to get him to ally with the communists in a united front against the Japanese. (Xi'an Incident) Additionally, the Communists actually saved his leadership, and it’s often forgotten that without the Communists’ help, Chiang would never have survived as a political force, since was the communists who convinced the officers to release Chiang and allow him to take control of the government once again. Chiang’s efforts against the Japanese gained him some influential friends. And although the Communist General Mao was responsible for much of the damage inflicted upon the Japanese, it was Chiang who got the credit mainly from Britain and the US. When civil war broke out in China, Chiang expected help from the allies, but after a long campaign against both the Japanese and the Germans, the US and Britain were reluctant to get involved in a civil war. His Western ‘friends’ literally abandoned him. He suppressed local culture in Taiwan (White Terror) and was responsible for the imprisonment of 140,000 Taiwanese. These people were taken captive for their alleged opposition to the KMT. At this time, anyone openly criticizing the ruling party was deemed a Communist sympathizer. He held the Taiwan presidency for 25 years. He held the Taiwan under a permanent state of martial law, thus ensuring his power was absolute. In fact, the constitution only allowed for two terms in power, but with martial law as his excuse, Chiang could rule indefinitely.
    4
  7724. ​ @yslee1401  Are you're saying those people walking in the background are all paid actors?
    4
  7725.  @MarkYeung1  What happened to them? I've already told you. In 2018, Yavlinsky ran against Putin and only got 1.05% of the vote. As for Alexei Navlany, in 2023 according to a poll by the Levada Center, only 9% of respondents said they held a positive view of Alexei Navalny, 57% disapproved of his activities, and 23% had never heard of him.
    4
  7726. Before USA overtook Britain as superpower in 20th century… Before Britain became a colonial power during 19th century… Both China and India were economic powers from 1 AD to 1800 AD … So the 21st century is merely China returning to our original status before the Opium Wars.
    4
  7727. It's clear that no matter what Carrie Lam does, the Hong Kong protestors will not be satisfied. Lam has formally withdrawn the HK extradition bill, yet the Hong Kong protests continue. Lam has announced that she is open to dialogue but the protestors aren't, and they refuse to talk. So Hong Kong government needs to resort to more authoritarian measures now.
    4
  7728.  @charlieqin1083  So you admit that its not fair to compare the disposable income of Chinese in the countryside, with the prices of sandwiches and hamburgers in top-tier cities like Beijing or Shanghai? Then what's the whole point of your comparison in the first place?
    4
  7729.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  Expansion? Firstly, China is only reclaiming territory that was historically part of China, primarily the last Chinese dynasty, the Qing Dynasty. Secondly, India is also expanding like when India annexed Sikkim in 1973, yet Bhutan allows Indian Embassy, but not Chinese Embassy? And what debt trap in Sri Lanka are you talking about? There is no debt trap diplomacy, it has been debunked by researchers from Chatnam House.
    4
  7730.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "Me being a son of ex-military personnel who served during that time (1990) knows what really happened." If you truly are the son of an ex-military personnel, then you're only present anecdotal evidence from your own side of the story. Have you talked to those Bhutanese of Nepali origins on how they were treated by the military? I mean, just because you have a father in the military doesn't mean he is always right, we should hear both sides of the story before arriving at a conclusion.
    4
  7731.  @Pioneer-zx5fx  "Shenzhou. What are you talking bro You want han china to wipe out bhutans own identity" Nobody said anything about Bhutanese identity, but what's wrong with simply having a Chinese embassy in Bhutan? Bhutan has an Indian embassy, even though India has annexed territories like Sikkim, but if they refuse just to have a Chinese embassy, then how can Bhutan be "leading the way" in the rise of Asia? If anything, it's the Bhutanese military expelling over 100,000 Bhutanese of Nepali origins (around 40% of Bhutan's population at the time), that's wiping out a part of Bhutanese own identity here.
    4
  7732.  @iz1287  What has majority of people in the world wanting their information privacy and freedom even got to do with China? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people lack freedoms? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    4
  7733.  @iz1287  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours.
    4
  7734.  @iz1287  About forced evictions, there exists many houses of people who simply refuse to move, called "nail houses" 钉子户 because the owners are like stubborn nails that stick out, while the rest of the region gets developed. These nail houses are all over China, and shown in the following sources, and the Chinese government just leaves these people be. Source: China's nail houses: the homeowners who refuse to make way – in pictures theguardian.com/cities/gallery/2014/apr/15/china-nail-houses-in-pictures-property-development Source: The owners of these defiant 'nail houses' in China refuse to give in to developers businessinsider.com/what-are-chinese-nail-houses-2016-8 So what makes you claim that Chinese government don't care about the original residents demands? These nail houses are proof that not all residents are forcefully evicted by the government in China.
    4
  7735.  @iz1287  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    4
  7736.  @tjena5772  Link＞ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053
    4
  7737.  @tjena5772  Because you clearly dislike China, then why pretend to like China when you don't? You Indians mock China's political system, then look at India's political system and why hasn't India surpassed China? What makes you think Chinese people aren't free, when countries all over the globe receive plenty of Chinese tourists and international students?
    4
  7738.  @ashokjain8449  Why don't you explain why you think Chinese people need rescuing? In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    4
  7739.  @ashokjain8449  So why do you think Chinese people need to be rescued? In 2016, China launched world's 1st quantum satellite, named Micius, (墨子) into orbit and demonstrated that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere, smashing the previous record held on Earth. Video: China's Quantum satellite achieves 'spooky action' at record distance youtube.com/watch?v=4QlcKuxDGrs Quantum entanglement (in a nutshell) is when two subatomic particles become an "entangled pair", able to influence their quantum states (won't go into detail here) seemingly regardless of the distance involved. One particle could be on the surface of the Earth, and the other on the surface of the Moon, and theoretically, they can still influence each other with no information (known to current science) passing in between them. The longest record for quantum entanglement on Earth is 143 km in at experiment in the Canary Islands. But China has allowed two stations (Delingha and Lijiang station) located 1200 km apart to communicate directly, through our quantum satellite, thus breaking the previous record and showcasing that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere. And as far as I know, this is a world first, and China is the first to launch quantum satellite into space.
    4
  7740. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West. Since the 19th century, many have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the U.S, is simply too frightening for many Westerners (but not all) to fathom.
    4
  7741. Biden called Putin a "killer", but Biden supported the US invasion of Iraq, resulting in 200,000 Iraqi civilians killed according iraqbodycount.org
    4
  7742. It doesn't have to be that way. Reunification with the mainland under the One Country, Two System policy means that Taiwan can keep their government, their elections, their passports, currency, etc, while still being considered reunified with the mainland. (It would be something like North Korea and South Korea agreeing to reunify into a single country, Korea, while allowing both sides to keep their respective governments. That's what China's One Country, Two Systems policy is all about.)
    4
  7743. +Arlen Tsao No major country in the world recognizes Taiwan as its own independent country. Even US President Trump has acknowledge One-China Policy after a phone call in 2017 Trump to honor One-China policy Source: washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/trump-agrees-to-honor-one-china-policy-in-call-to-xi-jinping/2017/02/10/ea6e7ece-ef4a-11e6-9973-c5efb7ccfb0d_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.710267195b01 Besides Trump, other world leaders, like Russian President Vladimir Putin, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, British PM Theresa May, Indian PM Narendra Modi, etc, have all acknowledge the One-China Policy that Taiwan is part of China.
    4
  7744. BRICS was founded ultimately to challenged the Western economic dominance on the world. If the West succeeded through the use of corporate led economies and capitalism, then what is wrong with BRICS wielding the same weapon against the West? We must first defeat the West first using its own weapons, before we can begin changing the economy of the world.
    4
  7745.  @irone7050  Those people you mentioned even resorted to censoring out your comment here.
    4
  7746. Mainland China is arguably the only one in the world to truly care for Taiwan. The US certainly doesn't., they call the island their unsinkable aircraft carrier. Mainlanders have been taught to regard the people of Taiwan as part of the same family, but its a shame that this feeling is not reciprocated by (some) people in Taiwan.
    4
  7747.  @currentchannel3452  What about Cyrus's videos before he had Covid-19? I watched Cyrus previous videos and he consistently promotes the peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" then isn't a positive message for the world? And are you saying that Cyrus' positive message is somehow the same as the Communist Party of China message?
    4
  7748. +Global Thinker I have stated very clearly that the government does not claim Bhutan as part of Chinese territory. Bhutan has no history of being under Chinese suzerainty, only under British suzerainty during British Raj. According to 1890 Convention of Calcutta, the border between China and Bhutan commenced from Mount Gipmochi onwards. PLA troops did not cross Mount Gipmochi and therefore, remained within Chinese borders. Convention of Calcutta https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_of_Calcutta.
    4
  7749. Which prison in the world allows their inmates to leave the premises to visit their families?
    4
  7750.  @FugueSt4te  I believe it's a combination of factors like the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Russophobia and Sinophobia in the West towards Russia and China. And it's having the effect of pushing both our countries closer together than before.
    4
  7751. I disagree with your suggestion that the Communist Party of China should change their name. China today is following "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics" where China is in the primary stage of socialism and needed to engage in economic growth before pursuing a more egalitarian form of socialism, with the eventual goal being communism (as described in Marxist orthodoxy). Communism is a goal that Communists in China want to work towards.
    4
  7752.    Communist party members visit the rural areas, keep track of poor people, monitor incomes levels, conduct local meetings to vote and listen to poor people's complaints, and then brainstorm ideas to lift them out of poverty. Do you have any idea what communists in China actually do for our poor people?
    4
  7753.    According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    4
  7754.    What's wrong with communicating on this platform? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    4
  7755.  @jaimemartinez9792  So since there are large population densities in the East and West of the United States, it's actually more profitable to connect East and West of USA, since there will be a larger volume of traffic travelling from either side. Because higher density represents higher demand, its just that the cost of building hi-speed rail is something most private companies won't consider if they don't see immediate returns. In China, Western China (Tibet, Xinjiang) has lower population density than Eastern China, yet China hi-speed railway still operate lines travelling from East to West, even though such lines operate at a loss, not a profit. Which private company would be willing to operate such unprofitable hi-speed rail? The fact that under capitalism, profit and expense dictate what is built, shows that private industry can't be relied upon to build infrastructure.
    4
  7756.    China has the freedom to follow our own political path to success, instead of blindly copying Western brand of democracy, why should China follow your political recommendation? Since China's current political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    4
  7757.  @michaelkatz275  Question: Is there any country where gold is used as legal tender? Answer from Quora: Oddly enough the USA and also the UK. You can use US minted coins to pay debts and taxes. Similarly you can do the same in the UK.
    4
  7758. Those Umbrella protestors were mostly idealistic university undergrads, who've been raised in cloistered world of education, of textbook ideals and perfect political theories. They haven't even stepped out into the real working world, get a job, apply for housing, get married and settle down, yet these naive students somehow think they already know how to govern Hong Kong already? Look at the rest of the working adults of Hong Kong, sending the kids to school and going to work as per normal. They weren't protesting because they know Hong Kong's situation better than these idealistic undergrads.
    4
  7759. +blazednlovinit Chinese workers make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, clothing, toys, sneakers cheap, so that the cost of living in other countries is kept to minimum. Think of the billions of dollars other people have saved on living expenses over the years thanks to access to affordable Chinese goods. If it weren't for Chinese goods in foreign markets, there will be inflation and people's daily expenses would be much higher than it is today..
    4
  7760.  @poseidon61  Yes, that's what many visitors to China told me too about WeChat Pay requiring setting up of a Chinese bank account. No Internet is necessary for digital Renminbi transaction too, so tourists don't even need to buy a mobile data plan in China to use digital RMB.
    4
  7761.  @mnp3713  You said: "westeners are well informed because we have a free press and a democracy" Tell that to Australian journalist Julian Assange. He exposed war crimes, only for him to be put into jail, instead of the actual culprits.
    4
  7762.  PROPAGANDA  Additionally, the smart people are oftentimes in the minority, and the stupid people are in the majority, so democratic elections are in stacked in favor of the stupid people's choices.
    4
  7763. The Chinese government and workers built brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days, followed by 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in 12 days, yet those China-haters called them "containers." Now look at USA erecting "tents" to treat their patients.
    4
  7764. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since faded to history. Our Chinese characters have been in used since 1200 BCE and today, Mandarin Chinese is the most spoken language in the world by number of speakers, whereas Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia), Latin (Rome) and Egyptian Hieroglyhs are considered 'dead' langauges. Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while most of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was in such high demand by Westerners that a route was created and named in honor of the material. Chinese also invented the Four Great Inventions 四大发明 which have gone on to influence the world. Paper and Printing made recording and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass improved navigation and made dangerous journeys safer and more reliable, and Gunpowder has influenced the way modern wars are fought. China literally built East Asia's culture, through our language, our poetry, our calligraphy, our culture, our, political systems, our inventions, our architecture, etc.
    4
  7765. If people think that smelling fuel is harmful for you, then why do people still work at gas stations, oil refineries, fuel depots, and other places with long term exposure to such fumes? Won't your friendly neighborhood gas station attendants be hospitalized by now?
    4
  7766. If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their constitution.
    4
  7767. India's streets tend to be crowded and the lanes are narrow. Perhaps the smaller, zippier, electric scooter is more suitable for India than this mini car.
    4
  7768.  @fadzilhashim.0910  You Malaysians love Chinese products 🇨🇳 like smartphones such as Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno yet what has India 🇮🇳 done for Malaysia 🇲🇾?
    4
  7769.  @fatdoi003  By slapping sanctions on Russia, Singapore is demonstrating that they are certainly not neutral, they are doing what the US wants. Apart from Singapore, no other South East Asian country sanctioned Russia.
    4
  7770.  @ZappyOh  How am I the comment-police? I'm not deciding what can and cannot be discussed in this video's comment section, in fact I even encouraged you to post your own video about your own subject matter. However, I'm just pointing out to you that Cyrus' video is primarily about EVs (Electric Vehicles) not self-driving cars.
    4
  7771.  @ytfp  serpentza is always welcome to apply for American or British citizenship, instead of Chinese citizenship. I mean, he clearly doesn't fit in China, then why did he come to China in the first place?
    4
  7772.  @zackk4393  But according to Wikipedia: A Madman's Diary, the diary form was inspired by Nikolai Gogol's short story "Diary of a Madman", as was the idea of the madman who sees reality more clearly than those around him. It's a work of fiction, not based on a true story.
    4
  7773. ​ @sjent Solar power plants often have the disadvantage of not being able to generate power at night. China has resolved this problem by utilizing molten salt to act as thermal energy storage. First, the Sun's rays are focused (i.e like through a magnifying glass) to heat up molten salt to thousands of degrees, which can be used to generate steam to turn turbines and generate electricity. The molten salt is so efficient at heat storage, that even at night, the molten salt is hot enough to continue generating electricity throughout the night.
    4
  7774.  @Sonyhamster  People think China is to be a feared, but China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. So I don't know which country should be feared more.
    4
  7775. In the past, as a British colony, Hong Kong was once a thriving port city closest to mainland China, (while the mainland was still dirt-poor at that time) Today however, times have changed and Hong Kong has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan and is facing increasing competition from upcoming mainland cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian, etc. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage And this is in spite of mainland cities being under CCP leadership, whereas Hong Kong is under their own democratic government. No wonder why the Hong Kong people feel like they're being left behind as mainland cities start surpassing them.
    4
  7776.  @chungusultimate  Well, Yasmin Porat is a witness to the events on Oct 7, and she says that the IDF fired on everyone there. How can you claim to know better than her then? Instead of listening to my data, you adopt a condescending attitude towards me for my views.
    4
  7777.  @chungusultimate  I've provided data to substantiate my claim, whereas all you've done is dismiss them that's all. Also, you said that the IDF did not intentionally target civilians, well have you considered that perhaps Hamas did not have such intentions as well? After all, their primary goal was to capture those hostages alive, so that they can exchange them for Palestinian prisoners, so why would they kill when they can take hostages?
    4
  7778. +Captain Midnight How is Tibet a nation? Tibet today is an autonomous region of People's Republic of China, as recognized by UN countries like USA, UK, France, Russia, Germany, etc. When people draw the map of PRC, Tibet is regarded as part of Chinese territory by countries all over the world. Falun Gong is a cult whose cult leader believes that he attained immortality and encourage his followers to donate their savings to him. Even early-stage cancer patients (who could possibly be saved) have been swayed to refuse seeking medical treatment for their condition, and believe that Falun Gong practice will cure their cancer. Look at Falun Gong leader Li Hongzhi 李洪志 living in posh mansion in USA and driving expensive cars, and do you think he is being oppressed at all? You constantly mock Chinese people lack of recognition, then what about the Japanese lack of recognition for their war crimes? Japanese committed various war atrocities across Asia, from China, Korea, Philippines and there is plenty of evidence for all of this. So far, all the things you mention about China were committed on Chinese citizens, not other races like what Japanese did to Chinese ,Koreans, etc, so again how is all of the points you mentioned related to issues of racism?
    4
  7779. One thing seems for sure. Russia's hypersonic Kinzhal (Dagger) missile has proven it's speed, it's plasma-bubble masking its approach from radar, and it's precision in hitting specific Ukrainian ammunition and fuel depots.
    4
  7780. Brahmos is supersonic missile, whereas China has hypersonic missile like DF-ZF that has been tested 7 times already and capable of travelling at Mach 10 (or 10 times the speed of sound)
    4
  7781. Western MSM specifically targeted Xinjiang's cotton, because cotton-picking occupies a special place among Westerners as a lingering sense of shame over African slavery. But videos show that majority of Uighurs in Xinjiang are driving cotton-harvesting machines to harvest truckloads of cotton, yet Western allegations of forced labour still persist. Video: Uighurs driving cotton-harvesting machines in Xinjiang https://youtu.be/ocVn5Cn101M
    4
  7782.  Charles Schmid  Go ahead and persecute the rich corrupt 1% in the USA and Europe, if you think that they deserve it. Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple dominate their respective industries. China actually has anti-monopoly law to clamp down on anti-competitive practices in the industry, even Jack Ma of Alibaba is being investigated under China's anti-monopoly law. Being rich in China doesn't excuse one from anti-corruption campaign.
    4
  7783.  @johanhirte9661  You said: "So China needs to be more transparent so these brands can be sure and source from Xinjiang." Look at Sketchers, they actually conducted 2 audits (1 unannounced audit on Jun 2020, 1 audit on Nov 2020) of their cotton factory at Lu Zhou and neither of these audits revealed any indications of the use of forced labour. Taken from Sketchers website: Since the ASPI report was published, Sketchers has conducted two additional audits of Lu Zhou, including an unannounced audit in June 2020 specifically directed at investigating the ASPI allegations and another audit in November 2020. Neither of these audits revealed any indications of the use of forced labour, either of Uyghurs or any other ethnic or religious group, nor did the audits raise any other concerns about general labor conditions. Therefore, China is clearly not prohibiting clothing companies from conducting their own investigations into their cotton sources in Xinjiang, as with the case of Sketchers. If Sketchers can do it, why can't H&M, Adidas, Nike, Uniqlo and other clothing brands?
    4
  7784.  @johanhirte9661  For the first time, China has surpassed the United States in terms of the number of scientific papers each country has published, according to the 2018 Science and Engineering Indicators report published by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Source: China Now Publishes More Research Than the U.S. — a Shift in Global Influence? https://futurism.com/china-overtook-us-scientific-output-first-time According to the list of papers logged by Elsevier’s Scopus database, in 2016 China published over 426,000 studies, while the United States published 409,000.
    4
  7785. +Park Minje So which country did China invade during that event? Also under Chinese laws, it is legal to harvest organs from death-row criminals with their consent or permission of relatives, and the organs are used for members of the immediate family of the deceased, but recently this law is slowly being phased out. There is also insufficient evidence to prove that Falun Gong members organs are being harvested. It they are sentenced to death, then the above law regarding death-row prisoners may still apply to them. Otherwise, nobody seems to approach and confront our government directly on this accusations so it is most likely that this is publicity stunt meant to malign Chinese government.
    4
  7786. Yet some still bark blindly for America, yet the dog owner doesn't see fit ensure they have enough to eat.
    4
  7787.  @MarkYeung1  China had explicitly warned the U.S that there will be consequences should Pelosi visit Taiwan island, so why should China continue to cooperate with a country that backtracks on their agreements?
    4
  7788.  @msimon6808  The Yellow Peril is still evident even in the 1960s, with the creation of Asian comic book villians like Fu Manchu and the Mandarin. In fact, Yellow Peril still persists even till today, just that it's often called Sinophobia instead.
    4
  7789.  @MarkYeung1  "That's why India maintains a relationship with Russia, with China, and with the USA (of course)." But when it comes to Ukraine, you constantly claim China should stop our relation with Russia, yet you look the other way when India does the same. Like China, India also does not condemn Russia's special military operation but you only single out China. "Is it the reason why Xi refused to go to India for the G20?" Xi is primarily focused on solving China's problems back home, not that it has anything to do with Modi. Furthermore, Xi and Modi already met during BRICS summit to discuss border issues, so there's no urgent need to meet again so soon.
    4
  7790.  @zetristan4525  Sometimes when I post something original in the comment section, YouTube blocks it from public view and I get all frustrated, so I post a previous comment that I know will be accepted by Youtube. I've had this happen to me so many times already that I lost count, so that's why I copypaste occasionally.
    4
  7791. The purpose of the (Fulbright) program was, as Reinhold Wagnleitner shows in his study, “‘designed to indoctrinate as well as educate.’”
    4
  7792. Likewise, more Hong Kong people need to be proud of their Chinese heritage, rather than be a tool of the West to destabilise and contain China's rise.
    4
  7793.  @MarkYeung1  What makes you think mainland China isn't proud of Hong Kong heritage? Out of every province in China, only Hong Kong and Macau are allowed to have their own governments separate from the mainland, under the One Country, Two Systems policy. But if Hong Kong choose to become a tool of the West to destabilize China's rise, then mainland China will not tolerate that.
    4
  7794.  @MarkYeung1  About Hong Kong's heritage, previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under the authoritarian rule of colonial Britain, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held in Hong Kong while it was a British colony. It was only during the 1997 handover that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders thanks to the One Country, Two Systems Policy. So are all these freedoms really part of Hong Kong heritage? Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain and not fully returned. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    4
  7795.  @MarkYeung1  Taiwan is where the remnants of Nationalist Kuomintang when Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) fled the mainland for Formosa (Taiwan) after losing the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳. During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee. The people of Taiwan need to wake up and realise that USA doesn't care about Chinese people, they're just using Taiwan as a pawn to contain the mainland's rise and prevent the full reunification of China.
    4
  7796.  @MarkYeung1  Once again, I never said that Hong Kong people are traitors, all I said was that if Hong Kong decides to become a tool of the West, then mainland China will not tolerate it that's all.
    4
  7797.  Johnny Dominguez  To replace our workforce, China is making the switch from menial labor to automation. Already, China is the world's largest market for automation and so many factories in China have become automated. For example, China opened Asia's first fully automated container port in Qingdao, that is more efficient than manual labor, and the machines can even work throughout the night in loading and unloading vessels.
    4
  7798.  @GM6.7  I mean, look at India, the world's largest democracy. India has world's 2nd largest population so its workforce is comparable to China's. Many Indians speak English (more favorable to the West) while many Chinese still struggle with English even till today. India has a better location, located in between the East and the West. If you look at Map of India, Southern India has more shoreline (thus, more sites for ports) whereas China's shoreline is concentrated in Eastern China. Yet despite all these advantages India has, the USA still chose to invest in communist China instead of democratic India?
    4
  7799.  @dirremoire  If the Chinese dragon can rise, then as Chinese I don't see why we should let the West cage us again like in the past. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want what the West had to offer, so they waged two bloody wars with China and force us to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to pump the opium addiction throughout China, and Hong Kong was taken and made into British colony. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former colonies, Hong Kong was not fully returned to China. Now China is waking up from that period of weakness when we were the sick man of Asia, and there's an opportunity for China to be great again, so we should grasp that chance to rise again.
    4
  7800.  @dirremoire  Maybe if you spend enough time enlightening a squirrel, it may evolve to become human some day
    4
  7801.  @yslee1401  You said: "most South East Asians don’t like Mainland Chinese" Many of them were former colonies of the West (i.e Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, etc) so the people there tend to have "colonial mentality". Such people tend to view Anglo-Saxon culture as inherently "superior" while viewing other cultures (including their own) as inferior.
    4
  7802.  @stopwarstop7334  Missiles need to point somewhere right? So obviously our missiles point in a defensive direction away from the Chinese mainland. But since there is no PLA troop buildup in the Taiwan straits (unlike the Russian troop buildup at its border with Ukraine) then do you have any evidence of the mainland planning to attack Taiwan?
    4
  7803.  @PebblesWhiskey  Cyrus Janssen is currently living in Canada not in China. But who says that you'll have to be sponsored to login to YouTube? VPNs aren't terribly expensive in China. And which person has been arrested just for login into YouTube while in China? You said: "Firewall in China is monitored because all big businesses in China has to ultimately answer to the CCP." In China, the Chinese government controls the Chinese companies for China's benefit, reining in companies when they gone too far. Whereas in the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    4
  7804.  @stopwarstop7334  Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out is derived from perceived U.S military support. But it's no secret today that the USA is in decline and China is rising. As long as peace prevails, China will eventually cross a threshold where the U.S has declined to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise. When that happens, Taiwan would have lost their perceived U.S backing, and reunification with the mainland would eventually occur.
    4
  7805.  @Carbuncle0168  The "Fall of the American Empire" is simply USA gradually becoming 2nd place and China gradually becoming 1st place. Just like when Britain was colonial superpower during the 19th century and was eventually surpassed by the USA in the 20th century. But prior to that, China (and also India) had been economic superpower for 1800 years and we made up 25% of the world's GDP share, according to world leading British economist, Angus Maddison. Source: Global distribution of GDP among China, India, Western Europe, USA, Middle East from 1 AD to 2003 AD wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA_Middle_East.png And judging from the above trend, it looks as though China is all set to dominate the 21st century. China is merely returning to our previous status before the Century of Humiliation.
    4
  7806.  @rpg1663  You said: "Many of the last century big discoveries and developments were made by much smaller countries," Because China in the last century was undergoing civil strife, starvation, poverty, invasion, and exploitation by the West (and Japan), in whats called the Century of Humiliation. During the 19th Century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so they waged two wars with China and forced us to buy opium from them, which was unwanted because it made our people sick and was poisoning the country. Port cities like Hong Kong was taken to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout the rest of China. Even when Hong Kong was eventually returned in 1997, the mainland had to agree to the Sino-British Declaration just for them to handover what was previously Chinese territory that they've taken. But now that China has reunified, civil strife has ended, and poverty alleviation efforts proving successful, it's only a matter of time for new discoveries and developments to start coming out of China. You said: "And please don't mention 5G LOL.. It's a good improvement of an already existing technology though." That's the point about existing technology, it can always be improved upon and be opened up to new uses. The same goes for carbon chips, which you claimed existed since 2013, but in 2020, China has made a breakthrough in perfecting the process for large scale industrial application. Once silicon-based chip reaches its theoretical limit, then lithography machines are simply unable to make those chips any smaller, so alternatives like carbon chips (whom are more efficient and less energy intensive) may come to the forefront, and China will no longer be affected by U.S sanctions on lithography machines, since the manufacturing process for carbon chips are different from silicon.
    4
  7807.  @akita3234  "神州 Shenzhou lol you didn’t see that video where the tank ran over ppl?" Could you link me that video where the tank ran over people?
    4
  7808.  @chrishannis1  If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of all the territory Taiwan claims (Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    4
  7809.  obimk1  The population of Uighurs in China grew from 10.2 million in 2010 to 12.7 million in 2018, an increase of more than 25%, so what Uighur genocide are you talking about?
    4
  7810.  @sam-gb8pb  The advertising boards representing the companies supporting UEFA. You can ignore those advertisements, but that doesn't mean that sponsorship of UEFA by those companies don't exist.
    4
  7811. If there is cooperation between China and the US, the whole world wins. If there is confrontation between China and the US, the whole world suffers.
    4
  7812.  The Snurger  Antisemitism was a prominent facet of the Nazi Party. If you're comparing China to Nazi Germany, then we should be seeing discrimination against ethnic minorities just like how Hitler demonised the Jews. However, everywhere in China, ethnic minority cultures, festivals and traditional clothing are being promoted by state media. Ethnic minorities aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Ethnic minorities enjoy special privileges over Han, such as tax exemptions, free education, priority in healthcare and admission advantages at universities. For example, if Han candidate needs 600 points to apply for a certain university degree, then ethnic minority candidate needs only 400 points, so it's easier for them to qualify for the exact same course as a Han candidate.
    4
  7813. @Ben Benito "Ruble will soon become rubble." Before the special military operation, the Russian ruble was trading at 79 rubles to 1 U.S dollar. When the West slapped sanctions on Russia, the ruble plunged 60% but today, the ruble has since recovered to it's pre-war value and is now trading at 80 rubles per USD. The West's attempt to collapse Russia's financial system has failed.
    4
  7814. USA funded $400 million to the World Health Organization, China only funded $40 million, yet Trump says WHO is China centric?
    4
  7815. Don't American schools also teach Native American kids English, and American history in order to foster a sense of belonging and patriotism to America? Why can't China do the same with Uighur children then? They are born in Xinjiang which is part of China, so they are Chinese citizens by law.
    4
  7816.  @eeyore345  China is providing free education to Uighurs and job skills training to prepare them for the workforce. They are being taught Mandarin Chinese (which is world's most spoken language by number of speakers) and this will greatly increase their job opportunities much more than their Native language (which by the way, is still being taught in Chinese schools) And they are been steered away from extremist thoughts and this is also facilitating their assimilation into Chinese culture. Look at the West and they are bending over backwards to accommodate Muslims immigrants. Refugees are fleeing their own conflict-ridden Islamic countries and flooding the Western countries like America, Britain, Germany, etc, and then they are under little pressure to adapt to their predominantly Christian host countries, much to the chagrin of local Westerners. Instead of assimilating into Western culture, these Muslim immigrants continue their traditions like Muslim men marrying multiple wives, and Muslim women wearing headveils in public, and secretly, many Westerners are angry at this, but they can't voice their honest opinions for fear of being labelled "racists" (even though Islam is not a race) or "Islamophobes" because of politically correctness culture.
    4
  7817. @Andy .P What about farmers protesting in the Netherlands and getting shot by the police?
    4
  7818. Mainland China had more impressive live fire miltary drills than this. Video: Live-fire drills! Watch Chinese military exercises youtu.be/UVMDi2TzZUc
    4
  7819.  @IdleForever9483  Is there something wrong with my using VPN?
    4
  7820.  @IdleForever9483  What makes you think it's illegal to use VPN while in China? Nobody will come arrest you for using VPN while in China. Which person has been arrested for doing so?
    4
  7821. If you read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) there is actually no allegations of sexual assault. Peng Shuai had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several years, and while she was emotional in her post, there are no allegations of sexual assault in her post. But the WTA is trying to politicize the issue in order to create ammunition for other countries to consider boycotting 2022 Beijing Olympics, that's their motive.
    4
  7822.  @chubascomohd2688  I think it's preferable for the mainland to reunify Taiwan as soon as possible through peaceful means, less Taiwan become another casualty of the U.S like Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Ukraine. The Big Fish is already being worn down in Ukraine, I've heard that it'll take U.S weapons-makers at least a decade to replenish their stockpile of Javelin missiles, no need to get Taiwan involved.
    4
  7823. Chinese government is reviving the "Mandate of Heaven" doctrine, where a competent leader is allowed to stay in power, and an incompetent leader will eventually be overthrown by rebellion. This doctrine may be old, but it has guided China successfully for 5000 years.
    4
  7824.  @item6931  I'm serious. China's economy is growing even in 2023, and I've even provided the figures in my previous post. Why not attempt to refute my point?
    4
  7825. ​ @stunningandbrave2520  You said: "Probably it will be like North Korea V2.0. The usual equilibrium state of dictatorships." China's economy is ranked 2nd in the world (the 1st if by GDP PPP) whereas North Korea's economy is ranked 138th, so how is China becoming like North Korea? China still remains the factory of the world and countries all over the world are buying Made-in-China goods, yet you're comparing China to North Korea?
    4
  7826.  @yslee1401  About R&D in China, China publishes more research papers than any other in the world, over a wide range of topics such as physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences. Countries by published scientific papers in 2018: 1. China (528,263 articles) 2. United States (422,808 articles) 3. India (135,788 articles) 4. Germany (104,396 articles) 5. Japan (98,793 articles) 6. United Kingdom (97,681 articles) 7. Russia (81,579 8. Italy (71,240 articles) 9. South Korea (66,376 articles) ... Source: List of countries by number of scientific and technical journal articles wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_scientific_and_technical_journal_articles This shows that many Chinese scientist and researchers are making discoveries and publishing their findings, contributing to mankind's scientific advancements.
    4
  7827. Over the course of 8 years, over 13,000 civilians have been killed in the Donbas region (Donetsk and Luhansk) by shelling by both sides. Over 800,000 refugees have fled Donbas and towards Russia. The Minsk agreement was meant to stop the fighting in Donbas, withdrawing of heavy weapons from the front line, and facilitate constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas, but wasn't honored. Russia is not starting a war, they're putting an end to one that started since the 2014 coup d'etat by the USA, ousting Ukraine President Yanukovych and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine.
    4
  7828.  @MarkYeung1  Many Australians can proclaim "Boycott Chinese Goods" then can't Chinese buyers reserve the right not to buy Australian beef or wine?
    4
  7829.  @joelturley4847  The world has become a board game in which: The USA is playing Checkers, thinking ahead by 1 move. Russia is playing Chess, thinking ahead by 5 moves. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking ahead by 10 moves.
    4
  7830. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China been successfully governed for millenia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    4
  7831. China manufacture our own weapons, ammunition, tanks and fighter jets, while India continue to rely on purchasing foreign military equipment. During wartime, China can replenish ammunition and make more tanks and jets to replace losses, but India would have to import more weapons from Russia and USA, which are subject to market prices. Those countries would happily jack up the price of their military equipment, since they know India can't refuse their prices and is desperate for military equipment.
    4
  7832. You don't even post anything substantial to attract him to comment on so why would he do that?
    4
  7833. The colonial mentality continues to afflict many in Hong Kong, causing them to worship Anglo-Saxon culture while harboring disdain for any "non-Anglo" culture (including their own). Even though Hong Kong has been physically decolonized, the decolonization of the mind still needs time, in order to heal the mental wounds inflicted by the colonizer on the minds of the colonized.
    4
  7834.  @MarkYeung1  China did not want to decouple from Australia. Australia is only China's 13th largest trading partner, whereas China is Australia's biggest trading partner. And the volume of coal imported by China is significantly lower than before the 2020s, so how is it a backfire?
    4
  7835.  @deschan2246  You can't even properly refute anything I said so far. Over 50 years ago, nobody expected "communist" China to ever succeed or become powerful and world player of politics. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, everyone fully expected China to soon follow. But China defied all expectations of failure and survived long after the USSR collapse and transformed from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into an economic juggernaut, the world's factory (Made in China) a growing scientific and technological power, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, and China today has strong global presence as well as being influential player of world politics. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite the Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success.
    4
  7836.  @deschan2246  As the world's most populous country, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4 times that of USA, China has at least 4 geniuses to every 1 American genius. And this can be proven statistically. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large Populations Have More Geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Taken from the above: Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    4
  7837.  @deschan2246  The Chinese government is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending and catching up fast to the United States. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($451.9 billion) <--- 3. European Union ($379.0 billion) 4. Japan ($165.7 billion) 5. Germany ($118.8 billion) 6. South Korea ($91.6 billion) In the West, researchers offend have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    4
  7838.  @joeburns88  If you think China's growth isn't 6.2%, then where is your sources describing China's actual economic growth then? The US clearly lacks a long-term strategy against China, since US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years, when their term limits are over, whereas Chinese government has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's direction and future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc, and to set specific goals for China to achieve by then.
    4
  7839.  @joeburns88  Evil empire? China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Mozambique, Kenya, Nigeria, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Zimbabwe, etc. Whereas the United States is a warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, etc, even in the 21st century. The US is enacting regime change by cutting off those country's "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now it seems Assad of Syria and Maduro of Venezuela are at risk of US regime change, and recently, President Trump narrowly avoided starting a fresh war with the Iran Supreme Leader.
    4
  7840.  @curtsheldon2655  "Dey tuk ar jewbs!"
    4
  7841.  @johncasey5594  You said: "Stop with this Natives were the original inhabitants of North America." I merely pointed out that America existed before Europeans colonized it, it's just your own hubris to think America would never have been discovered.
    4
  7842.  @s-man5647  "Thanks to modern trade practices, you only need a small minority of traders to import vast quantities of Chinese goods." The same could be said of those Filipinos that receive US paychecks. Only a small number of the political class receive money from the US, yet somehow they are able to instigate a large proportion of Filipinos to develop positive feelings towards their colonial masters while harboring disdain towards a country that has never colonized Philippines. Only with widespread colonial mentality, can this sentiment be readily adopted by the Filipinos.
    4
  7843. Erm, thank you for the random trivia of the day?
    4
  7844. +ClintexL2b There is logic to what I've said, and since its implementation, there has a been a marked improvement of Chinese people behavior and reduced number of offenses.
    4
  7845. +ClintexL2b Exactly. There's good and bad to everything. But the problem is, the whole system hasn't even been fully implemented, yet Westerners are already terming it as "dystopian". But the term originated from Orwell's novel and frankly speaking, its just a work of fiction and it doesn't necessarily mean the future will turn out like that.
    4
  7846.  @wuhuhu1390  Also, it's the Communist Party of China (CPC) not the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). It's name is 中国共产党 where 中国 refers to China and 共产党 means Communist Party, so it should be the CPC, not CCP.
    4
  7847.  @MrLee-qz3gy  There have been polls conducted that indicate that only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan. Source: Polls show only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/2156237/what-would-us-do-if-beijing-decided-take-taiwan-force
    4
  7848.  @capitanlunod8408  Taiwan's military drills hardly compare to the mainland's. Check out this mainland live fire exercise featuring drones, missiles, helicopters, tanks, etc. Video: Live-fire drills! Watch Chinese military exercises youtu.be/UVMDi2TzZUc
    4
  7849.  @MrLee-qz3gy  Americans have ranked Taiwan as their lowest concern on a list of eight issues to do with China in a survey carried out by a US think tank, Pew Research Centre. Source: Americans say Taiwan is the least of their worries about China scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2161734/americans-say-taiwan-least-their-worries-about-china
    4
  7850. Why did the Kuomintang even lose the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan) in the first place? During the Chinese Civil, nobody expected the communists to succeed, yet here we are today.
    4
  7851.  @Sweetpuffmuffin  U.S has 4 trillion going into welfare, yet why is there inflation, rising food and fuel prices, and a shortage of infant formula? Why not allocate that actual $40 billion to struggling Americans instead of pouring it into Ukraine?
    4
  7852.  @ziggyzugg  Earlier you talked about Putin squirreling away money, so does that mean you're also against Ukrainian President Zelenskyy squirreling away some $1.2 billion in off-shore accounts as well?
    4
  7853. Aleks Szwarczewski China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have long since faded to history. Chinese been keeping detail records of our history, so much that even other cultures draw upon Chinese archives to information about their own history. For example, Vietnam's Triệu dynasty (207–111 BC) was established by a Qin warlord, Zhao Tuo 趙佗. In the 12th century BC Korea, a prince Jizi 箕子 from the Shang dynasty of China, founded Gija Joseon. The title of Dalai Lama was bestowed upon Tibetan leaders, by a Ming dynasty prince 俺答. China knows all this because Chinese historians kept detailed records of our history. Why blame Chinese people when our scholars are the one recording history as it happens in China and in neighboring states of China?
    4
  7854.  David Leija  Chinese culture has a long history of innovation. For example, Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions?
    4
  7855. Beijing has also made history as being the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both the Summer Olympics (2008) and the Winter Olympics (2022)
    4
  7856. ​ @chrisbell238  As for seizing money, it's no secret that the US has frozen $7 billion worth of Afghan people's assets, as well as $30 billion (purportedly) of Russian assets. And China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, etc in African countries. As for IP, China applies for more patents in the world than any other, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators.
    4
  7857.  @chrishamlin5863  So if you're claiming Cyrus is being paid by the CPC to produce these videos, and Cyrus' videos have the peaceful message of Building Bridges, Not Walls, then isn't that a positive message for the world? You're saying that the CPC is all about peace, since Cyrus' videos are about peace between US and China? Or would you rather hear the alternative message (one of war), that's being spouted in the West?
    4
  7858. Canada detained Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou, how's that more realistic?
    4
  7859.  @neilhallam8028  Those "ghost cities" actually have people living in them. YouTuber channel Yes Theory visited one of them in China.
    4
  7860.  @Andy-P  You said "With more property than population there is going to be some unhappy people around." What's wrong with having more houses than people? At least it means that there are at least enough homes for everyone in China. I mean, would you have preferred the reverse scenario of having more population than property instead?
    4
  7861.  @Andy-P  "DailyBeatings Some do not even have a property - buying them before they are completed." We are talking specifically about homeownership rate, whereas you're talking about houses that haven't been completed which is not considered ownership.
    4
  7862.  @tl4172  You said: "Sounds like more cotton workers are needed," The Uighurs drive cotton-harvesting tractors to harvest truckloads of cotton in the fields, yet Western allegations of forced labour in Xinjiang cotton industry still persist? Video: Xinjiang, China’s top cotton producer youtu.be/ocVn5Cn101M Don't you realise that Western media bring up allegations of forced labour in Xinjiang cotton industry, because of their own unresolved guilt over their history of importing African slaves to pick cotton? Yet Westerners are projecting their guilt onto China.
    4
  7863.  @jurgenangler5294  Agreed. Many Chinese people warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors (just ask the expats here). However, many Westerners are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands with suspicion.
    4
  7864.  The Snurger  Who else would you debate about democracy, if not people with a different opinion from you? About democracy, what makes you think allowing ordinary people to participate in political decision-making that will impact the country's future is a wise idea? Ordinary people are fickle and they make poor voters for several reasons: -Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (i.e. They may not turn up to vote, or they submit blank votes) -Ordinary people may base their vote on emotions, not logic (i.e. Many British don't like immigrants, so majority voted for Brexit) -Ordinary people are susceptible to foreign influences (i.e. Russian interference in US elections) -Ordinary people may simply lack awareness of the country's real political situation, to make informed decisions regarding the country's future. There's a host of other problems associated with democracy, so why not let those who know how to govern, govern? That's what China is doing and look at how successful China is. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    4
  7865.  @robertjoel8087  The most powerful country in the world is suffering from a social crisis (George Floyd protests) as well as a healthcare crisis (120,000+ dead from Covid-19) an economic crisis (over 40 million unemployed) and to top it all off, a leadership crisis (Donald Trump).
    4
  7866. Back then, China was thought to be isolated (not true) while the US was all about active global participation. Today, it's the US that's heading towards isolation while China is an active participant in global affairs.
    4
  7867. Credit cards were invented by capitalists to encourage people to spend beyond their paycheck, by allowing purchasing on credit, so that by the time their paychecks arrive, people would need to spent a good chunk paying off credit card bills, sometimes racking up debts in the process.
    4
  7868. Martin Jacques is truly a fount of knowledge when it comes to understanding the civilization state that is China.
    4
  7869.  @smwk2017  There is a cost for learning a second language, but there are benefits as well. Learning a different language, grants access to a different viewpoint. Learning multiple different languages, grants access to multiple different viewpoints.
    4
  7870.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "My friend, ALL NATO nations are alarmed by Putin's aggression in Europe." But currently, Ukraine is not a Nato member yet why are they supplying military aid to Ukraine? Article 5 of Nato has not been triggered in any way.
    4
  7871.  @TheMargaretgallagher  Times have since changed, retired old-timer. America is actually dependent on China for almost 80% of its medicines, which is especially important given the current situation. Fox Business reports that according to FDA estimate at least 80 percent of active ingredients found in all of America’s medicine come from abroad, primarily from China. And it’s not just the ingredients, China wants to become the world’s dominant generic drug maker. So far Chinese companies are making generic for everything from high blood pressure to chemotherapy drugs. 90 percent of America’s prescriptions are for generic drugs. Source: U.S. is Dependent on China for Almost 80% of Its Medicine saraacarter.com/u-s-is-dependent-on-china-for-almost-80-of-its-medicine/ So are you sure about refusing trade with China?
    4
  7872.  @Redfvvg  Even if you disregard universities, Chinese 15-year old students scored the highest in the 2018 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) in all 3 subjects: Mathematics, Science and Reading. PISA 2018 ranking (Mathematics) 1. Mainland China 2. Singapore 3. Macau, China 4. Hong Kong, China 5. Taiwan, China ... PISA 2018 ranking (Science) 1. Mainland China 2. Singapore 3. Macau, China 4. Vietnam 5. Estonia ... PISA 2018 ranking (Reading) 1. Mainland China 2. Singapore 3. Macau, China 4. Hong Kong, China 5. Estonia ...
    4
  7873.  @WarrenKLiu  Actually, Singapore's political system is based on the meritocratic system of ancient China. So it's not far fetched to say that Singapore copied the meritocracy system of ancient China and that the People's Republic of China relearnt it.
    4
  7874.  @chrishannis1  "then why is the gdp per capita so much higher in HK than in China" Because Hong Kong has a smaller population than the mainland. Mainland China has the world's largest population, so if you divide our GDP by our enormous population, then of course you arrive at a GDP per capita lower than in Hong Kong.
    4
  7875. ​ @zackk4969  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"?
    4
  7876.  @zackk4969  “Diary of a Madman”.《狂人日记》 is a work of fiction by Lu Xun, then why are you confusing fiction with reality?
    4
  7877.  @nuckingfuts3204  Much of Western mathematics, science and astronomy had their roots in Asia. For example the Pythagoras Theorem that we all studied in trigonometry was was well-known to the mathematicians of the Old Babylonian period over a thousand years before Pythagoras was even born! In India the Baudhayana Sulba Sutra contains a list of Pythagorean triples discovered algebraically, a statement and a geometrical proof of the Pythagorean theorem. The Apastamba Sulba Sutra (c. 600 BC) contains numerical proof of the general Pythagorean theorem. Surviving Chinese texts such as Zhoubi Suanjing 周髀算经 "The Arithmetical Classic of the Gnomon and the Circular Paths of Heaven" gives a reasoning for the Pythagorean theorem and it is called the "Gougu theorem" 勾股定理 in China. During the Han Dynasty (202 BC to 220 AD), Pythagorean triples appear in The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art 九章算术 together with a mention of right triangles. Some believe the theorem arose first in China, where it is alternatively known as the "Shang Gao theorem" 商高定理 named after the Duke of Zhou's astronomer and mathematician, whose reasoning composed most of what was in the Zhoubi Suanjing.
    4
  7878.  @nuckingfuts3204  In linear algebra, the Gaussian Elimination method (named after Carl Friedrich Gauss 1777–1855) was actually known to Chinese mathematicians as early as 179 AD, which we call fangcheng 方程 from the Chinese text The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art 九章算术 and Chinese mathematicians also invented the first determinant that is used in matrix calculations today.
    4
  7879.  @dennykeaton9701  You said: "It's actually affecting the EU and China the most." Chinese and Russian vessels will have safe passage through the Red Sea according to Houthi political leader, Mohammed al-Bukhaiti.
    4
  7880. If it wasn't for Beijing, Washington would have zero chance of talking with Pyongyang. N. Korea initially agree to dismantle its nuclear facilities, but USA and S. Korea conducted military drills and ruined the negotiation. Now China has to clean up after USA's mess.
    4
  7881. If the apartment was in his wife's name and laowhy is complaining about how foreigners can't get things done in China, then why is laowhy doing all the paperwork here, while his wife is in America? Why not ask his wife to handle it then?
    4
  7882. Canada is located next to the USA, so they are under pressure to follow the USA's anti-China stance. But Australia is located closer to Asia than America and China is Australia's biggest trading, yet Australian politicians like Scott Morrison are fanning the flames of anti-China sentiment in Australia and following US's anti-China stance.
    4
  7883. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners (not all) are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    4
  7884.  @holybutterfly8495  "神州 Shenzhou No , sometimes this is good because for the people who lost their jobs then the Centrelink can give them a little bit of money for survival too." But where does the money for Centrelink come from?
    4
  7885.  @holybutterfly8495  You said: "The way you said it doesn’t work for China or the world ?" I simply pointed out that just because you think it works for Australia, doesn't necessarily mean it will work for China or the world. Like I keep asking, where does the money for this program come from?
    4
  7886.  @youtubeshadowbannedme  Why should I delete my account? Just because you're lucky to live in a region without racism, doesn't mean that Asian in other countries aren't discriminated. Look at this Singapore student assaulted in London. Source: Singaporean student in London says he was assaulted after reacting to COVID-19 comments channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/singaporean-student-london-covid-19-attack-racist-jonathan-mok-12494174
    4
  7887.  @Something-tz2vw  You said: "It's funny how much history books in China differ from those in Taiwan when it comes to the history of, say, Tibet." The Republic of China (i.e Taiwan) claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, etc) as part of their territory, including areas that are currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia, and Tajikistan. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg
    4
  7888.  @Something-tz2vw  "His "facts" are bs, except to you mainland Chinese." Could you point out which of my facts are BS? Clearly, you've made BS claims like "Not even Taiwan (part of China) claims all of them and never have." when Taiwan maintains the claim to the 11-Dash Line, compared to mainland's 9 Dash Line.
    4
  7889. The U.S's democratic experiment in Afghanistan ended in failure, after 20 years of experimentation, spending trillions of dollars in installing a U.S puppet government in Afghanistan and training/equipping the Afghan military. The democratic government in Afghanistan collapsed like a house of cards, the democratically-elected Afghan President Ghani fled his post, carrying vehicular loads of American cash into exile, and the 300,000-strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban with minimal bloodshed. If anything, Afghanistan proves that U.S.A can't just force their own democratic political system onto another country and expect it to work.
    4
  7890.  @primeroultimo  You said: "you all realize there is a trade deficit between the US and china to the tune of over 300 billion USD, in favor of china." The US-China trade deficit was ultimately caused by American consumerism. Made-In-China goods were (generally) cheaper than Made-In-America goods, so Americans spend lots of money buying Chinese goods. While at the same time, Made-In-America goods were expensive, so many Chinese consumers weren't interested in buying American goods (if they did, it wasn't on the same level as Americans buying Chinese goods). The point is why do you think Trump literally "forcing Chinese to buy American goods" is the right decision? Whatever happened to the principles of "free market"? A customer being forced to fork out money to buy American product that he/she may not even want, is going against the principles of "free trade".
    4
  7891. It was China that lobbied to recognize Uighur Muqam culture (i.e song, dances, folk and classical music) as an Intangible Cultural Heritage in UNESCO, yet the Western claims of Uighur "cultural genocide" still persist.
    4
  7892.  @kickyouinhalf  American presidents have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only make short-term plans for America's future, instead of long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. Whereas China has put forth numerous 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans etc to map out China's direction and future in 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050 and by abolishing the president term limits, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans through to completion.
    4
  7893.  @Aramsa-Khan  Politics should be about doing what's right, not what's popular. Sometimes, the popular thing may not be right, and the right thing may not be popular. Democracy, when reduced to its fundamentals, is about doing what's popular, not necessarily what's right.
    4
  7894.  @nss7565  I hope more people pay attention to serpentza's non-verbal clues like his mannerisms, his facial expressions, his attitudes, his actions, rather than just blindly believe him when he says "I love China." serpentza clearly doesn't mean what he says when he says he loves China.
    4
  7895. Meanwhile, President Trump "stands with" Saudi Arabia and defends Saudi Arabian Crown Prince from his involvement in murder of journalist. Double standards much?
    4
  7896. Why are you accusing me of being 50c and supporting CCP? When did I ever mentioned the communist party here at all?
    4
  7897. Matt M. Like I said before, you have your own opinion, and I have mine. Why sort of "mad love" are they even expressing, and why can't some Chinese people can't seem to detect it?
    4
  7898. Matt M. Who are you to tell people to be happy about something? I have my own opinion and you have yours. And why do you pretend not to notice their fake enthusiasm? For example, he claims that people should stop blaming their environments, but then he continues to blame both the America's and China's environments instead of himself, so isn't he being hypocritical here?
    4
  7899. I've noticed that those channels never portray anything about mainland China in a positive light. Which of those channels video actually say something positive about China?
    4
  7900. By banning Huawei, the United States is literally cutting themselves off from participating the establishment of global 5G infrastructure in the rest of the world, and allowing Huawei to make the first move to refine industry standards.
    4
  7901.  @ds-kj8fq  👍
    4
  7902. @Sheriff Lobo China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    4
  7903.  @PEANUT1102  Before Singapore ranked first, mainland Chinese students previously dominated the PISA ranking in 2018. In the 2022 ranking, China also participated this edition, but their results were not published as they were not able to fully collect data because of COVID restrictions. It's highly likely that had Chinese students data been collected, they would continue to top the ranking.
    4
  7904.  @michaeljames2349  If Taiwan is an independent country, then why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there something preventing Taiwan from joining the UN?
    4
  7905. North Korea already have unstable leader. Why keep provoking it further and pushing it to a corner? China supports cooperation and always urged all parties to show RESTRAINT for continued peace in the region. Our own lives are at stake here. If war breaks out here in East Asia, 78,000 Americans suffer, but thousands more Chinese, Japanese and especially South Koreans may perish from Trump's stupid, provocative actions in East Asia. Japan is already evacuating 60, 000 Japanese civilians from South Korea. To Americans, Pyongyang is far away on other side of Pacific Ocean, but over here tension is very high. Even Russia is greatly concerned at US actions in Korean peninsula. Why not explore alternative options instead if the same method doesn't seem to work? China no longer follow Marxism like it did it in the past and the government is communist in name only and our policies are more geared towards socialism. Why USA only stubbornly follow the only path it knows with N. Korea?
    3
  7906. Human beings are naturally complex creatures and naturally, their languages tend to be complex. Otherwise, we'll use baby talk all the time ^^
    3
  7907. +puchy110 But if Taiwan declared independence, China will be entitled to the excuse of quelling a "rebellious" state. It will be considered an internal civil war to anyone who recognizes the 1-China policy and not considered an external invasion of another country. The US currently recognizes that policy so if it decides to intervene, it would be breaking the policy and considered invasion of another country. On the other hand, if the US does nothing, it will preserve its reputation and be allowed to trade with whoever is the victor of the civil war without consequences. But the Taiwan president seems to be using Trump and the US to help Taiwan declare independence. Any wrong move here could trigger a possible World War 3.
    3
  7908. +Zan cer There is article about drunk US forces in South Korea beating up Korean forces. (nextshark(dot)com/u-s-army-brats-south-korea-get-drunk-assault-four-korean-adults-one-day/) Also, US forces personnel assigned to South Korea often patronize local prostitutes. The women were praised as "dollar-earning patriots" or "true patriots" by the South Korean government. The women discriminated between African American soldiers and "White" American soldiers, until African Americans rioted on July 9, 1971, near Camp Humphreys. "In 1992, Yun Geum-i, a camptown sex worker in Dongducheon, was brutally killed by U.S. servicemen. Yun was found dead with a bottle stuffed into her vagina and an umbrella into her anus. In August 1993, the U.S. government compensated the victim's family with about US$72,000" (Source: Wikipedia: Prostitutes in South Korea for the U.S. military) On another note, Japan also has US bases in Okinawa, and US servicemen have been known to rape the local Okinawans. Sources: Wikipedia: 1995 Okinawa rape incident (bbc(dot)com/news/world-asia-21626049) (rt(dot)com/news/344560-marine-rape-okinawa-confession/) This is the price SK and Japan pay for US "protection".
    3
  7909. Virtually all of Goguryeo's history comes from ancient Chinese texts. Even some of Goguryeo ruins are located in North Eastern China. How can South Korea claim Goguryeo was Korea when they still consulted Chinese archives for information about Goguryeo's history? This is what some Koreans refuse believe.
    3
  7910. 其实，高句丽是产生于中国东北地区的少数民族政权，并不是朝鲜历史政权。初期在中国东北经营，往后高句丽扩张至朝鲜半岛北部。高句丽与百济新罗合称朝鲜三国时代，其人民主要是濊貊和扶馀人，后又吸收些靺鞨人，古朝鲜遗民及三韩人。 History of Goguryeo Map （youtube.com/watch?v=3viLPxGVc2M ） 但是韩国人都声称高句丽是自己本国的原始民族。
    3
  7911. +Mercuric 5-Nitrotetrazole That's exactly what I been trying to say. Just look at map of Goguryeo.
    3
  7912. +인효빈 Since when is Youtube banned in China at all? People in China are allowed to access Youtube as long as they do it discreetly.
    3
  7913. Kory Toombs US press is controlled by rich corporations and can also be liberal biased or conservative biased. Not to mention the negative way they portray China most of the time.
    3
  7914. Lu Kang is only foreign affairs minister. President Xi Jinping is even more charismatic. In my opinion, they are competent for the roles.
    3
  7915. Ernest Tsim If you read my comment carefully, Hong Kong and Taiwan are part of China during Qing dynasty and even today, they are recognised as being part of China. Nothing false with this statement.
    3
  7916. +YuFan Huang Many Chinese mainlanders know what the government has done and aren't "brainwashed". The government can't control all 1.3 billion people to think in same way. Everyone will have a different opinion of the government's actions just like how other people from other countries have different opinion of their own governments. As for those issues, Western media does not always portray the entire issue without. If you know Chinese you have the luxury of researching Chinese articles on those issues and using them to cross reference with Western articles. You can even visit those places and talk to the locals to find out how they feel about the government.
    3
  7917. If US and China goes to war, it would probably be similar to US against Soviet Union in Cold War where they fight proxy war using some unfortunate country as the battleground.
    3
  7918. US needs to get permission because it is occupying other host country. China is building in its own territory so it doesn't require permission.
    3
  7919. Trump has many businesses in China so going to war with China over Taiwan is not good for business. Lets hope he doesn't flip his policy again in near future.
    3
  7920. It seems that 胡 was usually a general term for "barbarians" or foreign folk. The moon character 月 is actually ⺼ which is a modified 肉 -> Meat In terms of sound, 胡 (Hu) sounds similar to 古(Gu) but my Chinese teacher says "Sounds change, Words remain". So there's a lot of speculation on the original pronunciations. The meaning, however is more difficult to interpret. Ancient Chinese probably defined civilized behavior as wearing silk clothing. Since most barbarians wear animal skins, they use 肉 to represent their clothing and 古 to represent their ancient customs. Of course many Chinese have their own interpretations. The most popular interpretations are interesting and poetic in nature, just like your interpretation of 蝴. It also becomes easier to memorize words when there's a story behind it. One of my favorites is 笔 -> Pen. It consists of 毛 -> Hair and 竹(on top) -> Bamboo. The Ancient Chinese pen is the brush, which was made from Bamboo and Horse hair. 笔(Bi) is also used for modern writing pens, giving a touch of modern flavor to an ancient word.
    3
  7921. Peter Tran Korea was united under Joseon dynasty but after WW2, it was divided by the Allies into North Korea (Soviets) and South Korea (USA). North Korea tried to unify Korea but was prevented by the US.
    3
  7922. Who is the one being buthurt when you look at Korea and China today? Korea and China fought battles in past, but Korea no longer the same as it was 1000 years ago. Half of Korea depends on China for trade, while the other half depends on US military bases for protection. Today, China is economic powerhouse with PLA being world's largest land army. The government launched the world's first Quantum Satellite into orbit in 2016, and also demonstrated ability to take out a satellite in orbit with a missile launched from ground level. Also, who is Jimmy Fallon and what has he got do with China and Korea?
    3
  7923. Actually, Korean phones, like Samsung, was once popular in China in the past. They set up shop in China, because of low wages and easier to sell to Chinese market straightaway as we were one of their major customers. Nowadays, Huawei and Xiaomi have become more popular, displacing Samsung shares of the market, and Samsung is moving out because of increased costs in China. Source businessinsider(dot)com/samsung-smartphone-market-share-in-china-2015-5/?IR=T The government also imposed ban on many Korean imports and on Korean companies because of Seoul's plan to set up US THAAD system on their soil. S. Korea is the one feeling the effects of the sanction more than China. Lastly, S. Korea military is powerful, but still relies on US military bases in S. Korea, to defend itself from its Northern half. Korea is still a divided country today, which means 1/2 its land resources are locked up in NK, and the Korean War can always resume any time. Japan is only US ally, because Japan renounced the right to build an army, only maintaining a self-defence force, after its WW2 surrender. Even today, US military bases occupy Okinawa Japan, and US marines rape the locals, but Japan can't do anything about it.
    3
  7924. +PrankFrank Why resort to insulting people just because your beliefs are different? Repeating same few statements over and over again is not going help support your point. When S. Korea planned to deploy US THAAD system, Chinese government imposing ban on various Korean products, including games, cosmetics, and even Korean dramas, entertainment, shows etc. The government also ban some tour agencies from conducting tours to S. Korea because of this incident. So far, it is Korea that begin feel the pinch of these sanctions, not so much China.
    3
  7925. Actually, Chinese make products like smartphones, computers, appliances, sneakers, clothing, etc. cheaply so that the cost of living in other countries kept lower than it should be. Think of all the money people saved on living expenses thanks to affordable Chinese goods. People always complain poor Chinese quality and threaten boycott Chinese goods altogether. But in the end, demand for cheap goods remains high and customers continue buying them. They never stop to think about benefits Chinese goods afforded them.
    3
  7926. Golfgang Motzy Mozart Why don't you take a look at China owning $3 trillion worth US debt, before accusing others of being your servants, you American supremist.
    3
  7927. I don't know why you people seem to think China is lacking "freedom". Chinese people today have access to food, safety and security, education, modern technology like computers and smartphones as well as the Internet. You claim Chinese people have no "freedom" to travel, then why are there so many Chinese tourists everywhere? You talk about Chinese people being imprisoned, but still, America is the country with the highest incarceration rate in the world, and in USA, the prisons are so full, that sometimes the inmates are released back onto the streets to help relieve the overcrowded prisons. Chinese government is not perfect, but under their guidance, China prospered from poor, starving, war-torn, third world country, back in 1960s to become the world's 2nd largest economy, with world's largest land army, the PLA to protect us, as well as major player in global politics, and a potential rival to USA. Not many countries in world can claim such achievements within the span of a single generations. If our government works, then why is there a sudden need to change it drastically?
    3
  7928. If you noticed, North Korea has been threatening US military bases in South Korea, Okinawa Japan and even Guam, so why not USA withdraw its troops from those region first, then sit down and have good, calm talk with North Korean leader? Why keep pushing a crazy leader to extremes?
    3
  7929. Yes, China army is green because it is not a warlike country unlike the US. China's last major war is in 1979 while the US is involved in wars even in the 21st century.
    3
  7930.  @showalk  Stroke order is important because that's how Chinese characters are written. What if you need to write Chinese characters to communicate, but you don't have a phone or computer handy? Say your phone's battery died or somehow you lost it, then how are you going to communicate using written Chinese if you don't even know the proper stroke order? And even in this digital age, what software do you use to write Chinese characters? There are software where you can input Pinyin yes, but what if you don't know the Pinyin to a certain character? You write out the characters and the proper stroke order increases the software's ability to recognise the character.
    3
  7931.  @PhysicsGamer  Stroke order is the way Chinese characters are written. Do you write English words starting from right to left? Or from somewhere in the middle? No, you write the alphabets from left to right and in the same way, Chinese characters have a certain stroke order to them. And how is "font choice" the closest equivalent? There is literally only "one standardised font" choice in Chinese characters, nobody is asking you to follow other stroke orders, except for the Chinese one. You said: "What you described would be akin to students to reproduce some particular font's version of each letter "as part of learning" English, which is just about everyone would agree is pretty silly." But why is that silly? When I learned English, we had classes in cursive writing as "part of learning English" what's so silly about that? You give a class of non-English speakers the chance to write English words randomly and see how it turns out. Without a font of choice, English students are going to have a hard time writing English words without some sort of format.
    3
  7932.  @PhysicsGamer  I don't think anyone in China really wants portray themselves as that "the sort of person who uses that particular stroke order" it is because it's the accepted stroke order (as prescribed by the Chinese education system). I mean, nobody in English writes from right to left (eg, writing PhysicsGamer by starting with r-e-m-a-G-s-c-i-s-y-h-P) because they want to be "that person". What are you trying to suggest by bringing this as a matter of style/identity? Perhaps it's those who deliberately follow wrong stroke order that do so out of a sense of identity, not the ones who observe proper stroke order. For those having grown up with a different stroke, more often they find that learning the proper stroke order is beneficial rather than the one they were brought up with. You don't see the problem with your 台 character because it doesn't resemble any known Chinese character, it looks like Korean Hangul character. Someone looking at your character may not even realise you are writting Chinese, when it looks like Korean Hangul, so how can you say that there is no problem? Try asking other Chinese to decipher your illegible 台 character and how does that not constitute a problem in itself? Chinese is not English or German and the Chinese character for gift is definitely different from the English or German word. And about in what possible set of circumstances that you'll wind up needing to write that character to a Chinese stranger, what if the Chinese stranger doesn't understand your Mandarin and you need to write 台 (let's say for Taiwan 台湾) and you ended writing a Korean Hangul character instead? That Chinese stranger could assume that you're from Korea or going to Korea or all manner of misunderstandings. Even today, Chinese people write characters on people's hands (following the proper stroke order) to communicate the meaning across. Just like some Japanese people do with Kanji (Hanzi) Yes, my SCMP article does say "the speed of cursive is required" but it doesn't specifically say "cursive is faster than print" so where does my SCMP article say that "cursive is faster than print"? When it says "start printing their letters, it's talking about learning to write the characters instead of "print" (as in computer print) Here's a printing exercise for example. The next step after tracing letters is printing letters. Practicing printing letters helps kids learn the alphabet and is the first step towards learning to write. We provide a set of 26 printing letter worksheets, each with both upper case and lower case letters. Source: Printing letter worksheets for preschool & kindergarten https://m.k5learning.com/free-preschool-kindergarten-worksheets/letters-alphabet/printing-letters Can't you see your contradiction when you said "cursive has nothing to do with writing phonemes rather than letters" and "One also groups phonemes when one writes on print. That is not unique to cursive."? Since you admitted that you can also group phonemes in cursive, then how's it that cursive has nothing to do with phonemes? Either can be done, so both have something to do with phonemes, but the article is stating that cursive helps join phonemes together. Because each letter is connected to the next letter in proper cursive, and phonemes (like say Phy-sics-Ga-mer) have their letters connected in cursive and allows for better memorization according to the article. You saying "Despite never having seen the character 神 before" could have been referring to me even though 神 is part of my username. And since you have seen my username yourself then you clearly seen 神 before, so why did you claim that you never seen (or encountered) this character before? Those were your exact words, and it meant that 神 was a completely new character that you never seen or encountered before. I could tell you wrote 神 on digital input but had you written using pen or brush, then it's possible that you may have messed up the word many times before. Digital input allows for numerous "undo"s and deletion without much penalty, compare to making mistakes while writing on paper. "I made every stroke of the character while expending the least effort towards legibility as possible" No, it is apparent that this time that you expended additional effort to at least make 神 look legible, after your earlier mess up with 台. Your 台 character is an example where all notion of legibility is tossed out the window and had you applied the same mentality to 神, you wouldn't have acquired such a legible character. Even your "downward curve stroke" was clearly an attempt to make 礻look more legible, when following the proper stroke order would have resulted in a legible 礻radical. And about your hand position is after each stroke, had you followed a loop (left, top, right) like you said then there would be a moment in time when you were acting against gravity (from left to top, for example) than had you followed the proper stroke order for 礻 if this was a written on a wall or chalkboard for instance. Fewer strokes doesn't necessarily mean that you'll save energy or "expend less effort" if your hand positioning after each stroke isn't positioned to make the next stroke efficiently. Proper stoke order often take into consideration the hand position after each stroke in order to minimise energy spent. "Drawing against gravity isn't difficult when one isn't using a calligraphy brush or feather pen." Writing from top to bottom helps to minimise the affect of gravity on your writing, when your writing on a vertical surface like a wall or whiteboard or chalkboard. Sure, you may not be doing it right now, but what if when you encounter a situation where you have to write a character on the classroom chalkboard? Do you follow the proper stroke order or continue with your different stroke order, starting from bottom to the top? If you memorised the wrong stroke order since childhood, how can you apply the wrong stroke order every time to every situation in life? Rather than had you memorised the proper stroke order right from the beginning? How did you draw your 口 then? A single continuous line? If doing so, then at least one of left or right lines would be going against gravity and results in more effort spent instead of following the proper stroke order. The rounding of top and rightmost side of the box is normal and accepted, but oftentimes not a single O to represent a box. You've seen new students introduced to Chinese characters several different ways, but oftentimes those that don't stick to the proper stroke order may give up halfway through their studies or never fully realise the significance of stroke order until later when they reach the higher levels of the language. Learning different ways to write a single character results in less memorisation of a single proper stroke order and makes it more difficult to memorise the character if there are multiple ways to write them. Such students you described probably never advanced beyond learning basic Chinese characters. Yes, 藏 is consist of different components 艹, 爿, 臣, 戈 and each component have their own stroke order. I don't which method you used, but 藏 is generally written in that order from 艹, 爿, 臣, 戈. Your naive approach to writing 臧 was correct, because the inclination to start from left to right with 爿, 臣, 戈 is the proper stroke order. You don't start with 臣 in the middle before going to 爿 or 戈 because it's the wrong stroke order. As for the hairy situation you described, the first two strokes are necessary to "gauge the height of width" of the character and that's why an exception to the stroke order is made to allow the first stroke of 戈 to be made. This is common in some Chinese characters resulting a sort of merger between the components. For example, 我 was originally 手 and 戈 that over the years, have been merged into a single character 我 with its own stroke order, because the horizontal line that's "shared" by the component stabilises the overall shape. It's a bit difficult to explain unless you write out the character and want it to look neat on paper. And like I said earlier to blacklistnr1, for all my talk of stroke order, Chinese is an evolving language and microchanges are happening. The thing is that stroke order forms a proper basis for writing a certain character a certain way and over the course of thousands of years, the Chinese stroke order has been refined by scholars to what it is today. 臣 character has multiple stroke order. Some complete the internals first, others draw the outer boundary first. Both start from the top and ended on the bottom. 臣 stroke order (Method 1) strokeorder.info/mandarin.php?q=%E8%87%A3 臣 stroke order (Method 2) visualmandarin.com/tools/chinese-stroke-order/60682 I guess in this instance there are multiple ways to write 臣 but you started from the bottom, left and top sides, then doesn't it meant you drew against gravity at one point? And about "Finally I added the 艹 as standard" what happened if say you forgotten to write 艹 after you written 臧? You would have ended up with a different word and that's one reason why Chinese insist you start from top to bottom. People are generally lazy, even in English, many students forget to "dot their i's" because its instinctive that once you reach the rightside or bottomside, you feel like you completed the character or word. Many other characters with 艹 like 草, 莲, 菊, 茞, etc would form different words had the 艹 been forgotten at the end. So proper stroke order helps minimise potential mistakes as well in this case. About your totally different style of writing 藏, it's incorrect in the same way that 我 would be incorrect if 手 and 戈 were separated. Some people might even see it as 3 different characters, like 爿, 茞 and 戈 for instance.
    3
  7933. +Jason Boom If you look at Philippine independence declaration in 1946, the Americans drew the national boundaries of Philippines and did not include the disputed islands as part of Philippines territory. Only in 1970s did President Marco began incorporating those territory as part of Philippines.
    3
  7934. It would be in the US's best interests to reduce its involvement in wars in the future. Wars are very expensive affairs and usually reduce PR with other countries and produces stress on soldiers with post trauma disorders and increased chances of suicide. China has been peaceful for 30+ years which is one reason why it is able to progress rapidly. It spends money on its economy instead of spending it on wars.
    3
  7935. +Vollkorn Vampir Chinese government may be atheist, but there is a growing number of Christians in China that is people predict, will soon exceed the number of Christians in world.
    3
  7936. Chinese people are peaceful and only want to do business with US. Why declare war where people from both sides die. And for no reason at all?
    3
  7937. War should never be glorified. Young men die, women get raped, children get scarred for life. The Art of War say best war is to win without fighting
    3
  7938. +Rizvi Redwan China hardly follows communist ideology. It is in fact, more capitalist that some of the democratic states.
    3
  7939.  @venkatramakkineni  I never said that language can be represented by only one writing system. Take Japanese for example and there's Hiragana, Katakana and Kanji for writing the same word. But is learning this additional writing forms (like you said Sanskrit has 5 different scripts) means that the language has practicality? "Once you master English, Hindi, Telugu alphabet, you can read just about any text anywhere written in that language. You may not understand it, but that is beyond the point." How many words does English have compared Chinese? Including all those scientific nomenclature for the sciences? And like I said earlier, you don't need to know every single character in the Chinese language. An educated Chinese person will know about 8,000 characters, but you will only need about 2-3,000 to be able to read a newspaper. And what's the point of reading words when you don't know their meaning? Let's look at Chemistry for example and specifically at the Periodic Table of the Elements. In Chinese, the Chinese characters for metallic elements have the 钅radical for metal attached to them, such as 银(Silver), 铜 (Copper), 铁 (Iron), 铝 (Aluminium), 镍 (Nickel). The Chinese characters for elements which are gases have a 气 radical for gas attached to them, like 氧 (oxygen), 氮 (nitrogen), 氢 (hydrogen), 氯 (chlorine), 氟 (fluorine) and so on. The Chinese characters for non-metallic elements have the 石 radical for stone attached to them, such as 硼 (boron), 碳 (carbon), 硅 (silicon), 磷 (phosphorus), 碘 (iodine) and so on. You might even say that Chinese characters are more efficient than English words. Source: The Periodic Table Song With Chinese Character 元素周期表之美丽的汉字 youtu.be/MKn5FmWn_ME Again, adults have a harder time learning a new language because they already have their own 1st language and they're now learning a 2nd language. Compared than a kid learning a new language for the first time. And it's not that learning to write Chinese as an adult is hard, it depends on the adult's linguistical background. For example, Japanese adults often have an easier time learning Chinese characters (they have Kanji after all) compared to an adult English speaker learning Chinese for the first time. It depends on the adult's background, you can't just say that learning to write Chinese characters is not easy for adults. "English has 26 unique sounds" You're wrong, English has at least approximately 44 sounds, with some variation dependent on accent and articulation. The 44 English phonemes are represented by the 26 letters of the alphabet individually and in combination. You think that just because there are 26 letters in the English alphabets means that there are 26 unique sounds? Source: The 44 Sounds in the English Language thoughtco.com/sounds-in-english-language-3111166 And compared to that, Mandarin Chinese has about 37 unique sounds which is smaller than English. So by your standards, doesn't this imply Chinese is more efficient and more practical than say, English? You only need to program less sounds into a Mandarin voice-output software, compared to the sheer amount of English sounds so isn't Mandarin Chinese more practical in this regard? Why have more sounds, when you can communicate with less sounds? How does it make a language more practical? About decimal numbers, you aren't referring to spoken numbers so you're referring to written numbers? You can write in English all the numbers, such one, two, three, four, ... ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen, ... twenty-five, twenty-six, twenty-seven,... ninety-nine, one hundred, one hundred and one, one hundred and two.. nine-hundred and ninety-nine, one thousand, etc and its difficult to write (and read) everything out. Whereas in Chinese it's 一，二，三,... 十 (ten)，十一(eleven)，十二 (twelve),... 二十 (twenty), 二十一 (twenty-one), 九十九 (ninety-nine), 一百 (one hundred), 一百一 (hundred and one)... 九百九十九 (nine hundred and ninety-nine), 一千 (one thousand) and so on. In written numbers, written Chinese is much more efficient than written English numbers, so again, how does this make Chinese an impractical language? China actually publishes more books than any other country in the world per year, according to the following source: Books published per country per year 1. China (440,000) 2. United States (304,912) 3. United Kingdom (184,000) 4. Japan (139,078) 5. Russia (101,981) 6. Germany (93,600) 7. India (90,000) ... Source: Books published per country per year wikipedia.org/wiki/Books_published_per_country_per_year
    3
  7940. +Beliserius1 Yes, it has detracted from its basic roots but you can still derived the meaning based on what you know about Chinese. Take for example "Papa" or "爸爸 Baba". This is a new word, as ancient Chinese called their fathers 父. Since "Papa" sounds like 巴巴 (BaBa), they combined 父 and 巴 to form 爸. The 父 indicates that it refers to father and 巴 is how to pronounce the new word.
    3
  7941.  @rksleung  Vietnam still think that Japan's Shinkansen high-speed rail is superior, but the fact is that China is home to the world's largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Japan's high-speed rail in terms of track length. As for mainland Chinese kids in Vancouver, their lavish lives are limited by the fact that Canada considers them as outsiders or 2nd-class citizens in their lands. As for your last example, what's the name of the Chinese bank that parachute in mainlanders into a department and then fired all the existing employees and then hiring a HR consulting firm set up by his wife? Or else you could just be cooking up a story in order to smear Chinese banks.
    3
  7942.  @bobsmith3983  Agreed. Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai had proposed the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence (和平共处五项原则) to resolve the China-India border issue. But Indian PM Nehru refused to talk, instead he pursued his aggressive "Forward Policy" of building military outposts at our disputed border. Some outposts even went beyond the McMahon Line and into actual Chinese territory itself.
    3
  7943.  @marktuyet  So you're against Eileen Gu because of her expressing support for her motherland?
    3
  7944.  @cba4389  Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    3
  7945. @ainke "Also, why would USA need Norway in any way?" Norway is an artic nation and it's the same question that Greenland and Canada are asking of the US regarding their respective countries. What does the US want them for?
    3
  7946.  @MarkYeung1  Chinese media also promotes modeling careers of local women, what "freedom of press" are you talking about? And speaking of freedom of speech to speak out against political issues, why is Eileen Gu being criticized by Americans just for wanting to politically represent China instead of America?
    3
  7947. Here's a Chinese analogy taken off Weibo, to explain the Russo-Ukraine conflict in the form of a family drama: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family, which in turn open up a path to her ex-husband's doorstep. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    3
  7948.  @annbeckner7885  Do you see @Peter Chu's comment? It's disappeared from my screen. Also it says 6 replies but I only counted 4 replies (as of this comment).
    3
  7949.  @elanor2123  "神州 Shenzhou Those names aren't fit at all, please refrain the use of such words to refer anything." Those names clearly fit the analogy. USA is clearly dictating to NATO what to do, just look at Joe Biden's threatening to cut off Nord Stream 2 pipeline supplying Russian gas to Germany. It's typical of the U.S.A to sacrifice Germany's interests just to promote their own U.S interest of selling LNG to Germany. You said: "the countries in Nato all have the same interest, which is countering the influences of Russia, formerly the Soviet Union(USSR)." NATO was formed in response to the Soviet Union's rising military might, but ever since the USSR dissolved in 1990s, NATO no longer serves any interest, except serving the U.S hegemonic interest. You said: "Regarding ur second paragraph, it doesn't make sense, does it?" Again, why can't you point to me what horrible things Russia did to Ukraine? Ukraine was poor before, but under the Soviet Union, Ukraine had remarkable industrialization. In 1950 industrial gross output had already surpassed 1940-levels. In the prewar years, 15.9 percent of the Soviet budget went to Ukraine, in 1950, during the Fourth Five-Year Plan this had increased to 19.3 percent. The workforce had increased from 1.2 million in 1945 to 2.9 million in 1955; an increase of 33.2 percent over the 1940-level. The result of this remarkable growth was that by 1955 Ukraine was producing 2.2 times more than in 1940, and the republic had become one of the leading producers of certain commodities in Europe. Ukraine was the largest per-capita producer in Europe of pig iron and sugar, and the second-largest per-capita producer of steel and of iron ore, and was the third largest per-capita producer of coal in Europe. And it was all achieved while Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union. You said: "Communism has never yielded a good result in terms of economy in Europe." Are you certain about this statement? Before 1912, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe at that time, full of peasants who made up 80 percent of the population and whose traditional household economies were extremely inefficient compared to agriculture in Western Europe or the United States. Only about 15 percent of the population lived in towns, and fewer than 10 percent worked in industry. But after the 1912 Communist Revolution by the Bolsheviks, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe both militarily as well as economically. In fact, the Soviet Union was the world's 2nd largest economy from 1960 to 1985, only just behind the United States at number one, so what are you talking about? The Soviet Union was the most successful economically out of all countries in Europe during its heyday. Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by largest historical GDP (Soviet Union was world's 2nd largest economy from 1960 to 1985)
    3
  7950.  @isaackabimbiri4155  Has US done the same for Israel? They continue to supply military aid to the IDF for them to target hospitals, refugee camps and UN schools.
    3
  7951.  @rebelmango2141  "Everything you said is probably wrong and has no evidence to support." The Ukrainian delegation (named David Arakhamia) has confirmed this. Putin has revealed to African leaders that Moscow and Kiev had signed a draft agreement “on permanent neutrality and security guarantees for Ukraine” at the talks hosted by Türkiye in Istanbul. But as soon as Russia pulled back its troops from the vicinity of Kyiv as a gesture of good will, Ukraine reneged on the deal.
    3
  7952.  @rebelmango2141  "Bucha isn't goodwill" Russia has called for an independent investigation into Bucha. Russian forces left Bucha four days earlier before the arrival of Ukrainian forces into Bucha. Even the local Mayor had released a video message stating that the Russian army had left the city without mentioning any locals shot in the streets.
    3
  7953.  @rebelmango2141  "Shenzhou. Nothing you said is true" I literally gave you proof, from the Ukrainian delegation David Arakhamia. Looks like you can't refute my point so you just dismiss my claims as untrue that's all.
    3
  7954. ​ @svenhanson398  That guy certainly can't debate, he just told me "Shenzhou. Nothing you said is true" even after I gave him proof.
    3
  7955.  @rebelmango2141  Putin literally has the draft that he and the Ukraine delegation David Arakhamia agreed upon, and he waved it in front of African leaders.
    3
  7956.  @phlei95014  "神州 Shenzhou i do agree but the high youth employment rate about 20% ," China's youth employment rate is around 80% what are you talking about?
    3
  7957.  @kwokholuk8723  The key word in your comment is "if they can afford the tuitions and fees, or if they get fellowships from top American universities."
    3
  7958. NATO's small arms supplied into Ukraine are going to end up on the black market, and accessible to terrorist forces, while NATO's heavy arms are going to end up destroyed. Either way, NATO is unable to change the outcome of Ukraine (which is defeat/surrender/negotiation with Russia)
    3
  7959.  @yaphonghor4409  I meet those anti-China people who always use the same stale excuse of "I'm not anti-China, I'm just anti-CPC" to defend themselves and justify their anti-China stance. But the truth is that they don't care about China's interests, nor do they actually want to see China succeed that's all.
    3
  7960.  @abhijitsen2197  China has produced many successful Internet companies like Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, JD, Suning, ByteDance (Tik Tok) Meituan, NetEase, Pinduoduo etc, but where are the famous Internet companies from India to compare?
    3
  7961.  @abhijitsen2197  Didn't you boasted earlier about how India's digital platforms growing at a faster rate than China? Then you should be able to name Indian companies that can compete with Chinese companies like Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, etc. Or just take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Vivo, Oppo, OnePlus, Realme, and so on. But where are the famous companies from India to compare with China?
    3
  7962.  @abhijitsen2197  But where are the famous companies from India that you boasted about, compared to Chinese tech companies like Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, etc? Besides smartphones, Chinese companies also dominate the civilian drone industry and Chinese company DJI is world's largest civilian drone-maker according to the following source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019
    3
  7963.  @abhijitsen2197  So it appears you've made an empty boast about India's digital platforms growing at a faster rate than China, yet you can't even name any companies from India that can compare with Chinese companies like Alibaba, Tencent, Huawei, Xiaomi, DJI, etc. If you look up Fortune Global 500 of the top 500 corporations worldwide, China actually has the most companies in the ranking: As of August 2021, this is the list of the top 10 countries with the highest revenues top 500 companies according to Fortune Global 500. 1. China (135 companies) 2. United States (126 companies) 3. Japan (53 companies) 4. France (28 companies) 5. Germany (27 companies) 6. United Kingdom (22 companies) 7. South Korea (15 companies) 8. Switzerland (13 companies) 9. Canada (12 companies) 10. Netherlands (11 companies) ... Source: Fortune Global 500 But where are the famous companies from India to compare with China?
    3
  7964.  @abhijitsen2197  Also, check out Forbes Global 2000 and many Chinese companies like Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, China Construction Bank, Ping An Insurance, Agricultural Bank of China and many other Chinese companies made it onto that list. But where are the famous companies from India to compare with China?
    3
  7965. Karl Marx was a philosopher with revolutionary ideas way ahead of his time. Its just sad that the rest of humanity hasn't evolved to the correct stage viable for the implementation of Marxist theory. Maybe one day in the future, when humanity's current virtues have drastic changed, when we start seeing each other as true equals, when we see a stranger on the street but treat him/her like a old friend, when we see a beggar but treat him/her like a king, when we see a king but don't worship him like one, when we see other people's children but treat them like our own, would Marxist theory be able to be fully implemented.
    3
  7966.  @bajaxbajax910  Why is it humans have discovered the ability to defy nature, and to keep food fresher for longer periods? Why is it humans have evolved beyond animalistic instincts? We laugh when someone trips and falls or makes a funny mistake, or cry and mourn when our people die (sometimes we cry over the prey we killed) whereas animals don't laugh or cry? Agreed with you that creatures find places that are suitable to their propagation. Therefore, it can be said that Marxism hasn't thrived in human societies yet, because humans mindset haven't yet evolved to the stage where it is suitable for Marxism to thrive. Because we are still afflicted by human vice that prevents Marxism from being successful As for human vice, why is it that some people do charity work or become vegetarians, or refuse to steal, even when no one is looking? Even when the benefits to themselves are minimal? Why is it some people are "saints" that exhibit the best virtues of humanity? If 1 person can be born and raised like that, then why not 10 more, or 100 more, or the entire human population? I mean, if you go back in time to the time of our prehistoric ancestors, and try to introduce modern virtues like "not being racist" or "treating women equally as men" how will their primitive societies react to that? It just shows that primitive tribes aren't "ready" yet for modern thinking, likewise, our mindsets today aren't ready to embrace far-futuristic thinking yet. You are taking about communist nations with our current mindset (which is mostly about greed, selfishness, etc). But what if communism was applied to a group of people with "enlightened" thinking from the future, who are willing to give its principles a shot? Communism/Marxism may not survive in today's modern thinking, but there's no guarantee that it won't in the future.
    3
  7967.  @nightmark2120  "神州 Shenzhou LOL and more Filipinos are in the US making money and literally feeding Filipinos through remittances." Where's your proof? There are Filipinos making money in China and feeding Filipinos through remittances as well.
    3
  7968.  @MarkYeung1  The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution is a very complex subject. Certainly it was a very popular movement among the masses, but who knows whether it was the right thing to do? Chairman Mao had wanted to purge the remnants of capitalist and traditional elements from Chinese society. Capitalism had resulted in corruption permeating Chinese government, and it's only recently under President Xi Jinping who's willing to tackle the mountain of corruption in the Communist Party of China. So if you look through historical lens, the goal of the Cultural Revolution was probably the right thing to do. You said: "Contrary to what you said, the Great leap forward, Cultural revolution and June 4th were NEVER taught in Hong Kong school during the Colonial period." I think you misquoted my words, I never said those subjects were taught in Hong Kong during it's British colonial period, I said the Century of Humiliation and the Opium Wars weren't taught in Hong Kong's education
    3
  7969. There's a solution to the shortage of wives. Lonely rural Chinese men are purchasing brides from places like Vietnam in order to start a family.
    3
  7970.  @yslee1401  Several impartial Western observers had been present in Tiananmen Square at the time (1989/06/04) including a Reuters correspondent and a Spanish TVE crew, and they say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    3
  7971.  @yslee1401  I've already given you the Chilean diplomat (Carlos Gallo) eyewitness account that he did not observe any mass firing of guns inside the Square and that the troops who entered the Square were armed with anti-riot gear (i.e truncheons and wooden clubs) This is backed up by Western observers including a Reuters correspondent and a Spanish TVE crew, and they say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    3
  7972.  @stephenlam7677  Hopefully, more Hong Kong Chinese people start thinking like you. China is vast country after all, very diverse and home to Shanghainese, Beijinger (Pekingese?) and numerous others, but of course there's room for people of Hong Kong to be part of China, yet retain their unique Hong Kong culture.
    3
  7973. It's the story of the Tortoise and the Hare. NATO (Hare) is exhausting their list of sanctions on Russia and running out of weapons to send to Ukraine, without reaching the finish line. Whereas Russia (Tortoise) has weathered the storm of sanctions yet is making steady, incremental progress towards the finish lines.
    3
  7974.  @bell-xk5dd  Agreed, It's better to engage in rational discussion and present facts to supplement arguments where possible, instead of reacting emotionally to a lopsided view of a country.
    3
  7975.  @ashpatel2505  He inserted himself into the discussion precisely because one side appeared to lack proper etiquette, and started hurling insults and accusations, while the other was presenting facts and being rational. For example, Russia is far too important a country to be left out of the new world order, and even North Korea deserves a chance at being included with the rest of the world. But you seem to hold something against China for being friends with Russia, even though India also regards Russia as a friend.
    3
  7976. But why US military took more than 15 years to defeat some insurgents in Middle East? In 15 years, the soldier's children back home can easily grow up in the time their parent has been absent. Shouldn't the wars be much shorter if your troops are well-trained and well-equipped?
    3
  7977. Those so-called "think tanks" are funded by the makers of actual tanks – the military-industrial complex.
    3
  7978. +Zelnick Agreed with what you said. And during wartime, India buys military hardware from USA or Russia, who may suddenly decide to jack up the prices of their military equipment, because they know India has no choice but to buy them. Whereas China can always make more tanks, aircraft, ammunition, etc, domestically to replace wartime losses.
    3
  7979.  @MarkYeung1  Mainland China holds the largest number of Hong Kong expatriates, far more than United States, Canada, United Kingdom and even Singapore. (Source: Wikipedia: Hongkongers)
    3
  7980.  @theblackdeath4398  Do the modern Egyptians understand Egyptian Hieroglyphs? Or do the Italians understand Latin? Or the Iranians understand Sumerian Cuneiform? Even today, Chinese kids can understand passages from thousand-year-old Chinese books like Sun Zi's The Art of War 《孙子兵法》 and The Analects of Confucius 《论语》 for example.
    3
  7981. It makes no sense for Russian forces to painstaking avoid civilian casualties, only to sabotage their own efforts with Bucha. Also, Russian forces had weeks to "cover up evidence" and "bury the bodies", instead of stupidly leaving the bodies strewn haphazardly all over the place, in plain sight for the Ukrainian forces to "discover".
    3
  7982.  @markcasila8310  "神州 Shenzhou that was due to the opening of the markets to china and not the CCP," And who opened markets to China, if not the CPC? It was clearly the Communist Party of China that opened markets in China, so how is China's development not credited to our government? The slavery conditions were by Western companies like Apple, Nike, and it was the Chinese government that fines Western companies for poor working conditions. Source: Apple under fire again for working conditions at Chinese factories theguardian.com/technology/2014/dec/19/apple-under-fire-again-for-working-conditions-at-chinese-factories And you're saying that 60 million people died during the Great Leap Forward? China's population in 1950s-1960s was around 600,000 million, so you're saying that China lost around 10% of our population? Then why is China currently the country with the world's largest population?
    3
  7983.  @markcasila8310  How is China influencing US politics? The USA is the one enacting regime changes in other countries and influencing other country's political systems.
    3
  7984.  @patrikpass2962  Why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule the mainland.
    3
  7985.  @ZeldaZiplock  1) Sparrows ate both grain and insects and were considered pests since they couldn't be controlled by Chinese farmers unlike ducks and chickens. The point is that sparrows aren't the only insect-eating animals around, our rice fields had insect-eating frogs and fishes. How can you just blame people starving to death as the cause of Chairman Mao like that? 2. So the local governments lied about the abundance of crop harvests to Chairman Mao that's why Mao thought there was sufficient grain to export to the Soviet Union to repay them for imports of Soviet agricultural machinery, then how's it Mao's fault? The problems came from bottom up (the inflation of harvests) not from the top down, how do you expect Chairman Mao to pierce through the lies formed by local governments? An underwater reef? That's an unforeseen obstacle under the water, if the watcher in the crow's nest (ship's look-out tower) notices visible rocks as an incoming hazard to the ship, but chooses to lie to the captain about the obstacle, then if the ship crashes on the rocks, how's it the captain's fault? 3) So China's modern steel production is thanks to our first baby steps, the backyard furnaces, granting Chinese farmers metallurgical experience. The Great Leap Forward represents PRC's transition from a dirt-poor agricultural country to an industrial country. And the backyard furnaces did not operate year-around, and did not disrupt farm harvests, but the farmers gained valuable metallurgy experience that will served them well later when Deng introduced his economic reforms in late 1970s. The Great Leap Forward experienced success in many areas. By 1958, agricultural production almost doubled from 1949 (108 million tons to 185 million tons), coal production quadrupled to 123 million tons, and steel production grew from 100,000 tons to 5.3 million tons. And about putting farmers to work in the steel furnaces, where else is China going to get workers from? China was 90% agricultural country and we want to transition into an industrial country, so where are our workers going to come from, if not from the farmers?
    3
  7986.  @ZeldaZiplock  In response to centuries of flooding on the Yellow River, the Sanmenxia Dam (三门峡水利枢纽) was constructed to control the floodwaters so that the Yellow River could be better controlled. The dam is multi-purpose and was constructed for flood and ice control along with irrigation, hydroelectric power generation and navigation. It is the first major water control project on the Yellow River and its image was even imprinted in our Renminbi banknotes. Once Chairman Mao Zedong realised that the Great Leap Forward wasn't working, he cut short the Great Leap Forward from 5 years to 3 years, and even wrote a self-criticism and stepped down as state chairman. It was actually US embargo caused millions to starve. In 1963, the Chinese press called the famine of 1961-62 the most severe since 1879. In 1961, a food-storage program obliged China to import 6.2 million tons of grain from Canada and Australia. In 1962, import decreased to 5.32 million tons. Between 1961 and 1965, China imported a total of 30 million tons of grain at a cost of US$2 billion (Robert Price, International Trade of Communist China Vol II, pp 600-601). More would have been imported except that US pressure on Canada and Australia to limit sales to China and US interference with shipping prevented China from importing more. Canada and Australia were both anxious to provide unlimited credit to China for grain purchase, but alas, US policy prevailed and millions starved in China.
    3
  7987.  @larrysmith2123  Hong Kong's economic success was built while it was under the authoritarian colonial rule of Britain. Previously, Hong Kong was once a British colony, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong. Only during the period of Hong Kong's 1997 handover, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favorite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, where they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony? Lastly, although you did not mention it, Singapore is the last of the Four Asian Tigers/Dragons to see massive economic growth. Singapore has been governed by authoritarian single-party PAP for 55 years (their entire life as a nation) and it transformed Singapore from a sleepy fishing village nation into a world class country. All in all, this trend seems to show that Asian countries/regions actually seem to flourish best under an authoritarian system, as shown in the examples I listed above. Likewise, mainland China today is flourishing under authoritarian single-party Communist Party rule.
    3
  7988.  @fireturkeyfly11  The conflict between the two sides led to the American Civil War. Just like the Chinese Civil War between the Nationalist Kuomintang and the Communist Party of China. Had the KMT succeeded, China today would be a pawn of the West, just like Japan and South Korea.
    3
  7989.  t i  My point is that Hong Kong actually flourished under authoritarian rule, not because of democracy that Hong Kong is successful. Democracy was introduced during the period of 1997 handover, Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy for 150 years as a British colony, although admittedly, they flourished economically. Since Hong Kong's history shows that they prospered under authoritarian rule, won't it be better if Hong Kong had fully been under authoritarian communist party rule, instead of being a democracy under One Country, Two Systems Policy?
    3
  7990. It's like a boxing match between USA and China. Except that the U.S is busy punching himself in the face. While China is busy doing push-ups to get stronger.
    3
  7991.  @INTJ791  Also, once U.S transfers Taiwan's TMSC wafer fabrication plants to Arizona, then the island no longer serves any of the US's interests isn't it? Would the US want to intervene if conflict breaks out across the Taiwan Strait?
    3
  7992. Zheng He had to earn his power and position in the emperor's imperial court among numerous other imperial eunuchs. Its not just a simple matter of being a eunuch only.
    3
  7993.  @yslee1401  Of course! Canada is actually trying to protect Meng from CPC clutches! It all makes perfect sense now! Why didn't I think up such a conspiracy theory myself?
    3
  7994.  @dagsmoko3889  "神州 Shenzhou Please tell us how the Chinese government has assisted Meng." The Chinese Foreign Ministry has brought up Meng Wanzhou's case to USA and Canada. Source: Ministry urges release of Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou chinadaily.com.cn/a/202012/05/WS5fcac451a31024ad0ba99e8c.html
    3
  7995.  @dagsmoko3889  Source: Ministry urges release of Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202012/05/WS5fcac451a31024ad0ba99e8c.html
    3
  7996. Agreed. Corruption afflicts every country to a certain degree, but at least under President Xi there are crackdowns on corruption within the communist party and more than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption in China, including over 120 high-ranking officials, including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders.
    3
  7997. +Sam Shyam You trust a group of leaders who throw tables at each other to lead Taiwan? In the meantime, the Chinese Communist Party has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc, to map out China's direction and future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc. By abolishing the presidential term limit, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. China is planning long-term not short term. For example -China plans to eliminate poverty and become innovation hub by 2020 -China plans to become world leader of Artificial Intelligence by 2030 -China plans to ban all fossil fuel vehicles and switch to renewable energy by 2040 -China plans to surpass USA's military and become global power by 2050 Source: Xi Plans to Turn China Into a Leading Global Power by 2050 bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-17/xi-to-put-his-stamp-on-chinese-history-at-congress-party-opening But Taiwan's new government, DPP, is green and inexperienced in politics, and isn't the authoritarian, battle-hardened, politically-experienced KMT of the past, the one that drove Taiwan to success in the past. Where is Taiwan's plans for 2020? or 2030? or 2040? Will the DPP still remain in power that long? Won't the Taiwan President be forced to step down after her term ends?
    3
  7998. +a b South Korea progressed rapidly under S. Korean dictator, Park Chung Hee, who turned S. Korea from a developing country into a developed country. One of Park's main goals was to end the poverty of S. Korea, and lift the country up from being a 3rd World economy to a 1st World economy via etatist methods. Park has been ranked by the public as the greatest S, Korean president but he still remains a controversial figure in modern S. Korean political discourse and among the S. Korean populace in general for his dictatorship and undemocratic ways.
    3
  7999. +lei jiao Once again I clearly said that DPP wasn't in power from 2000 - 2008, KMT was. Only in 2016 (2 years ago) did DPP finally wrest control from KMT. How is my information wrong?
    3
  8000. +Urban Decay But why can't China be a superpower? The Chinese government has publicly stated that China's system is not for export, and China is not interested in spreading "communism" like the former Soviet Union (or the USA with democracy). Instead, China adopts a policy of non-interference in other country's affairs and does business with partners who want Chinese business. “We will not import other countries’ models, and will not export the China model,” Chinese President Xi said. “We will provide more opportunities for the world through our development,” he said. Source: President Xi says China will not export its political system reuters.com/article/us-china-parties-idUSKBN1DV4UM Whereas the USA is involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Libyan War, Afghan War, etc, even in the 21st century, USA is bombing those countries and cutting off those countries heads (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing its own US puppet governments in place. Now USA is eying Syria and the Assad Regime seems to be next on the list.
    3
  8001. Gamer Lycan  China today is not at war with those countries, and the dispute thus far is bloodless. I mean which country is China currently at war, for you to label China as warmongering? Also, some of China's biggest trade partners are Asian, such as Japan, South Korea, Malaysia and Vietnam, so how is China a big barrier for other countries trying to increase their share? List of the largest trading partners of China wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_trading_partners_of_China
    3
  8002. +Aribeth De'Tylmarande How will a rising superpower without democracy can cause serious safety problems worldwide? China today is at peace and not at war with any country since our last major war in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure in less developed countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Angola, etc. But look at democratic USA involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Libyan War, Afghan War, etc, even in the 21st century! USA is bombing those countries, killing civilians and destroying property, so people are left jobless, homeless and without family and angry at USA, so they flock to join the terrorists. When one terrorist cell is eliminated, another rises in its place! So isn't "democratic" USA causing serious safety problems worldwide instead of China?
    3
  8003.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou That is officially of the organisation before trump tried to cut it off (I wonder why that is), not to the members pockets specifically as China does." So where's your evidence that the WHO is bribed by China? I've shown that USA contributed 10x more money to WHO than China, so if anything, the WHO should be in the U.S pocket, not China's. Yet the USA with only 4% of the world's population is home to more than 25% of the world's Covid-19 cases and deaths, then it shows that the WHO is not bribed by the USA at least.
    3
  8004.  @namelesssnitchy  Where did you get your bloated figure of 40 million dead? The Great Chinese Famine was from 1959-1961. China's population in 1955 was 612,241,552 and by 1960, China's population was 660,408,054 having increased by 48,166,502. Source: Population of China in 1955 populationpyramid.net/china/1955 So you're saying that from 1959-1961, China's population decreased by 40 million, when from 1955-1960, China's population actually increased by a further 48 million? Where did you get your exaggerated death toll figure from?
    3
  8005.  @MarkYeung1  On the day Russian forces left Bucha, the mayor tweeted that all is well, he never said anything about killing civilians by Russia. Also if you check those videos of Bucha, those killed had the white armbands around them indicating that they were pro-Russia, so why would Russia kill their supporters?
    3
  8006. It's part of the Colonial Mentality. Being a former British colony, many Indians (but not all) tend to worship Anglo Saxon culture and look down on any "non-white" culture (including Chinese culture).
    3
  8007. At 1:11 of the video, many Vietnamese also see their country as being the most democratic according to the survey.
    3
  8008. A person without a "British-colonized brain" won't be using terms such as "commonwealth" which is strongly associated with the colonial powers. Singapore being a former colony of the British, tends to have to colonial mentality of which the "commonwealth" might sound like a good idea. But China is a civilization state with 5,000 years of history and culture as well as a different way of thinking. In Chinese minds, the best solution is still reunification through the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy.
    3
  8009.  @bbokdoong  Then why USA need over 600 military bases worldwide? In Okinawa Japan, South Korea, Philippines, Guam, etc, halfway across the entire globe and surrounding China then? China only has a mere TWO overseas bases that's all, yet you people act like China is the bully and aggressor here? Source: List of countries with overseas military bases wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_overseas_military_bases
    3
  8010.  @bbokdoong  You just said "leave Korea out of it" and then you ask "Why do you think Korea should stay neutral?" You literally answered your own question yourself here. China would gladly leave S. Korea out of the issue if they remained neutral, but if S. Korea takes a side in this trade war, then that's no longer being neutral isn't it?
    3
  8011.  @bbokdoong  Did I ever said that SK owes China anything? I mean, China can survive without SK business as shown in that period in 2017, but can Korea survive without China's? And what's wrong with me saying Korea should remain neutral you tell me?
    3
  8012.  @MarkYeung1  Other countries only "respected" China when we were a dirt-poor, starving country in the past. No one is afraid of a poor China. But now that China has "awaken", industrialized and advanced under the Communist Party, the Western countries start seeing China as a potential threat and want to contain China's rise.
    3
  8013.  @Tam55511  China has many universities yes, but China is world's most populous country, and there is possibly not enough resources, not enough schools, not enough jobs for everyone in China. With such high student population, competition for top schools and higher education in China is fierce and intense. Some students don't qualify for local university, so instead they choose to study abroad in USA (especially. if their parents have $$$). Some Chinese graduates can't find job in China, so may also choose to seek job opportunities overseas too.
    3
  8014.  @boknow5506  Chairman Mao is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    3
  8015.  @MarkYeung1  "In any case, Vietnamese troops were in Cambodia for 10 years afterwards and China and USA didn't do anything about it." Yes, it just goes to show that China only halfheartedly wanted to punish Vietnam (a "limited conflict" like you said) and it was only after VP Deng visited USA and spoke with President Carter. Most likely the Sino-Vietnam War was meant to "seal the deal" between Deng and Carter, that's why Deng said: "The child is getting naughty, it is time he got spanked" to Carter. Also, earlier you wrote: "神州 Shenzhou That's not a promise. Jimmy Carter will tell you that." yet I'm still waiting for you to answer my question: "Could you show me where did Jimmy Carter said that?"
    3
  8016. China first invented the paper banknote, and eventually the rest of the world followed with paper currencies of their own. Now China is rolling out digital Renminbi, and eventually, the rest of the world will follow with digital currencies of their own.
    3
  8017. Are your American workers willing to work for the same low pay as Chinese workers? If not, then prices of Made in America goods are going to be higher than Made in China goods.
    3
  8018.  @bignoseYeu  Xinjiang used to be plagued by numerous terrorist attacks such as the 5 February 1992 Urumqi Bombings, 1997 Urumqi bus bombings, 2008 Kashgar attack, July 2009 Urumqi riots, 2010 Aksu bombing, 2011 Hotan attack, 2011 Kashgar attacks, April 2014 Urumqi attack,_ etc. The re-education program is meant to de-radicalize those people and since then, there hasn't been any terrorist attack in Xinjiang since.
    3
  8019.  @jimmys6050  This @Tom van Aarle guy keeps on disputing facts that's been brought up to him, and seemingly resorts to verbal insults just because he's unable to refute points brought up to him.
    3
  8020.  @rightsdontcomewithpermits7073  Is insulting Chinese infrastructure the only thing you know how to do?
    3
  8021. He's has good orator skills.
    3
  8022. +JOBPEDIA Why is China not capable of doing full scale war against India? You claim China is cheating, fraud, copycat, but during wartime, China can always make more tanks, fighters, ammunition and equipment to replaces losses. But India depends on importing foreign miltary equipment from Russia and USA, and they may suddenly decide to jack up the price of their wares, because they know India has no choice but to buy them. So why you still claim China is incapable of doing a full scale war with 7th largest country? China is world's 2nd largest economy, with 2nd largest military spending in the world, after USA.
    3
  8023.  @MegaBanne  You said: "The capitalist class will take over the role of the government and regulate to support the competitiveness of their own corporate entities." If that's truly the case, then why was Jack Ma's company, Ant Group the target of government crackdown for anti-competitive practices? The company was on the verge of a multi million dollar deal, only for the government to rein it in.
    3
  8024. People all over the world have professed their love of Chinese food and in virtually every major city in the world there is usually a "Chinatown" where people can go enjoy Chinese cuisine. If you like meat, there is Peking Duck. If you want something light, there is Dim Sum. If you like rice, there is Fried Rice. If you like noodles, there is Chow Mein. If you like spicy food, there is Mapo Tofu. If you're in a rush and want something portable and filling, there is Pork Buns. If you like seafood, then Chinese people love seafood too. China has such a rich culture of food, so there is bound to be something to suit everyone's tastes out there.
    3
  8025.  @drmodestoesq  That's because Vietnam invaded Cambodia in December 1978 and overthrew the Government of Kampuchea (Cambodia), occupying Cambodian territory without installing a government. Since China is Cambodia's ally, we cannot let Vietnam just invade a country and get away with it, that's why Deng Xiaoping decided to punish Vietnam for their transgression.
    3
  8026.  @vietnguyen4312  "There is no reason for Taiwan to join with a still developing CCP China and go backwards." Does that mean you'll agree that Taiwan should reunite with the mainland, once the CPC improves by 4x and mainland China transitions from being a developing country to a developed country? Then we are in agreement then. The Communist Party of China is always improving itself and hopefully China will eventually reach developed country status and the reason for Taiwan reunification will appear (according to your statement).
    3
  8027.  @vietnguyen4312  You said: "Would you work for 75% less pay for the same job?" Even though people in Taiwan are paid more, Taiwan has higher cost of living than the mainland. Food is incredibly cheap in the mainland, so is rent, electricity bills, gas, water and other ultilities. Public transport is cheaper too, commutation fares are far more reasonable, so even if you get paid more in Taiwan, the living expenses are higher.
    3
  8028.  @billyhe2724  You said: "China also has if not more homeless, drug and poor." Mainland China's home ownership rate is more than 90% (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations (Huang et al., 2020). Whereas Taiwan has an 85% homeownership rate, and about 88% of those are single-family houses.
    3
  8029.  @petersinclair3997  The Manchu people that conquered Ming Dynasty China eventually assimilated into Han Chinese culture, and that's why they called their empire the Qing Dynasty (清朝) and Taiwan was part of Qing Dynasty. After conquering "China proper", the Manchus identified their state as "China" (中國, Zhōngguó; "Middle Kingdom"), and the emperors used both "China" and "Qing" to refer to their state in official documents, so Taiwan was part of China even during Qing Dynasty.
    3
  8030.  @firmaith  "神州 Shenzhou snd if you have to try to hunt down anomalies, that’s not very convincing." The point is that Zelenskyy being Jewish doesn't automatically grant him immunity in supporting Nazis, as I've highlighted several examples of Jewish people who collaborated with Nazi Germany, so the basis of your argument has been dismantled. "Zelensky had never been a Nazi," I never said Zelenskyy is a Nazi himself, but he's supporting Ukrainian ultra-nationalist neo-Nazi groups like the Azov Battalion. Even NATO took pictures and posted Ukrainian soldiers wearing uniforms sporting Nazi symbols as their insignia so those pics had to be taken down later
    3
  8031.  @firmaith  "Look at the history of the Chinese navy." China was historically a naval superpower. During the Ming Dynasty, Admiral Zheng He made seven voyages throughout the Indian Ocean, visiting Africa, India and the Middle East, leading an armada of over 300 ships with a crew of over 27,000. The flagships (aka treasure ships) were enormous, around 3-5 times the size of Christopher Columbus' Santa Maria. But it was a peaceful merchant convoy meant to trade Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, porcelain (fine china) to other countries in exchange for exotic animals.
    3
  8032.  @firmaith  "And the navy China is building now is ridiculous, a thousand small ships." The People's Liberation Army Navy is the world's largest navy by number of ships, and since China is mostly patrolling South China Sea, then what's wrong with the employing the strategy of smaller ships to patrol the SCS? Only the U.S Navy wanting to maintain global dominance invests in having huge capital ships, which represent a significant drain on the U.S resources. "China benefitted from the American presence and your only reply is, China didn’t ask." You yourself admitted that the US benefits from it too, yet in another sentence you complained it cost the US more to maintain shipping lanes in the Pacific than it cost China, then can't I point out the fact that China did not ask for it? I even proposed a mutually beneficial solution, that USA withdraw their warships froom the SCS and leave the Chinese navy to protect our shipping lanes ourselves.
    3
  8033.  @firmaith  There's something seriously flawed in your analysis, that just because Zelenskyy is Jewish that he doesn't support Nazis. Your race doesn't automatically grant you immunity from supporting Nazis, there's so much evidence of Nazi activity in Ukrainian miltary that you are deliberately overlooking. And how does citing yourself teaching history and politics for forty years prove anything?
    3
  8034.  @firmaith  "神州 Shenzhou yes, because the ships are small and basic" China is not planning to send the PLA Navy halfway across the globe to U.S waters then what's wrong with the PLAN building small ships to patrol the South China Sea?
    3
  8035.  @firmaith  "神州 Shenzhou what's wrong with benefiting from something?" Did I ever said there's something wrong? All I saying is that China didn't ask for this. I even proposed a mutually beneficial solution that USA withdraw their warships from the South China Sea and leave it to Chinese warships to defend our shipping lanes, since you complained about the USA maintenance costs of sending warships halfway across the globe.
    3
  8036.  @billyhe2724  The paper also says: Meanwhile, China has experienced an unprecedented housing boom in recent decades. In the first decade of the 21st century, the number of housing units built in China was roughly twice the total stock of housing units currently in Spain or the UK, or about the same as Japan's current total stock (Economist Intelligence Unit, 2011). Judging from the rising average housing area, Chinese households enjoy much better and larger housing than before. Per capita residential floor space in Chinese cities increased from 4 m2 in 1980s to 22 m2 in 2000 and 40 m2 in 2018 (NBS, 2018; Yi & Huang, 2014). While it is still far below the level in the US, it is on par with many developed countries such as Japan and European countries. For the emerging middle class in China, it is fair to say that they have achieved the “Chinese Dream” of decent housing and homeownership."
    3
  8037.  @vietnguyen4312  So I take it you agree that Taiwan should eventually reunite with the mainland once the Communist Party improves by 4x and when mainland China transitions from a developing country into a developed country? Then we are both in agreement, I also want the CPC to improve by 4x or 8x or as much as possible, and for China to eventually transition into developed country status. Taiwan's Air Defense Zone literally covers a huge portion of mainland China, where is the People's Liberation Army Airforce going to fly our fighter jets then? In fact, in the last sortie, if you trace the PLA aircraft flight path, they flew closer to mainland China than Taiwan island. As for Taiwan's sovereignty, their constitution literally states that Taiwan is part of China, and both Taiwan and the mainland agree to the One China Policy. Japan had relinquished claims over their previously occupied territory after the WWII surrender. So China doesn't have to consult Japan for our own internal issues between Taiwan and the mainland.
    3
  8038.  @vietnguyen4312  The cost of living in Taiwan is (generally) more expensive than in the mainland. Food prices are cheaper in the mainland, so are expenses like rent, electric bills, gas bills, water bills, cheaper in the mainland. Bus fares, train fares and other transportation expenses are cheaper in the mainland than in Taiwan. Mainland China's Tier 1 cities are an exception and the cost of living is comparable to Taipei, but people in Taiwan can still enjoy the lower cost of living in Tier 2 or Tier 3 cities in the mainland, so this is an incentive for Taiwan to reunify with the mainland. Again, mainland China is no hurry to absorb Taiwan. Time is on the mainland's side, the quality of life in China is gradually improving day by day, and China is patiently waiting to the time Taiwan will reunify with the mainland someday in the future. This is especially true given that U.S is in decline and China is rising, and eventually Taiwan cannot count on perceived U.S military backing, once the U.S declines to the point they can no long afford to challenge China's rise.
    3
  8039.  @firmaith  The United States was literally training and funding the Azov battalion in Ukraine. In March 2015 Interior Minister Arsen Avakov announced that the Azov Regiment would be among the first units to be trained by United States Army troops in their Operation Fearless Guardian training mission. Azov published a media release on its website on 20 November 2017 stating that it had met with a foreign delegation of officers from the United States Armed Forces and Canadian Armed Forces on 16 November.
    3
  8040.  @firmaith  Even right now, it's self-evident that for all their cheering for Ukraine, NATO and USA are not going to put boots on the ground to defend Ukraine. Ukraine's admission into NATO right now seems unlikely to be successful, because it would mean NATO would be obliged to send reinforcements to defend Ukraine if it were a member under Article 5, and I just can't see that happening. Ukraine has been literally abandoned by NATO, even Zelenskyy himself laments this fact.
    3
  8041.  @firmaith  If you look at the graph at 6:20 of the video, only 6 percent of the people of Taiwan want independence, where did you get your 55 percent wanting independence from? The vast majority of the responses all want to maintain the status quo. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Amending Taiwan's constitution and formally declaring independence would be seen as changing the status quo, and that is a move that the majority of people polled do not want in Taiwan.
    3
  8042.  @Todd-rk2lb  Lol, what makes you think I've being forced by my government to type here? I present China's side logically, yet I'm being met with vitriol just because my views happen to differ from yours.
    3
  8043. There's clearly insufficient evidence of an ongoing genocide in Xinjiang. Even the International Criminal Court (ICC) has asked for more evidence before it will be willing to open an investigation into claims of genocide against Uighur people by China. Source: The Guardian: ICC asks for more evidence on Uighur genocide claims
    3
  8044.  @yxmichaelxyyxmichaelxy3074  Again, not all tariffs. Exporters only pay for export tariff (which are very rare) whereas importers pay import tariffs (which are what Trump's tariffs are all about) and the cost is eventually passed on to the consumer themselves.
    3
  8045.  @junebug8485  "So in your opinion, muammar gaddafi was the better option?" Libya was once North Africa's most prosperous democracy under Muammar Gaddafi, until the U.S killed him and Libya today is a shadow of it's former self. Gaddafi was about to introduce the Gold Dinar, an African currency backed by gold that could free Africa from the tyranny of the U.S Dollar.
    3
  8046.  @ne0ge049  About "going nuclear", firstly, China is not defenseless as we have nuclear weapons of our own. So the USA will think twice about starting a nuclear war with a nuclear capable country like China. Secondly, at the end of Trump's presidency, General Mark Milley made a phonecall to his Chinese counterpart (General Li Zuocheng) that U.S would not launch an attack on China. So why do you seem to believe things will turn nuclear?
    3
  8047.  @dolphins8536  Exactly. Those Uighurs are Chinese citizens, therefore they are being taught Mandarin Chinese, Chinese history and that their motherland is People's Republic of China. I mean, aren't Hawaiians American citizens too? Don't they learn English, American history and that their motherland is United States of America?
    3
  8048. Cyberspace exists whether we like it or not. People today are glued to their screens, even while out in public, so what China's Metaverse is doing is facilitating integration of cyberspace with real space. Whereas the U.S's Metaverse is focused on making cyberspace ever more disconnected from real space.
    3
  8049.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "Well, Ukraine was actually neutral up to the moment Russia invaded it." Ukraine was neutral right up to the US-sponsored 2014 coup d'etat of President Yanukovych and installing their own U.S puppet into Kiev. After which Kiev fought a civil war with Donbas, and over the course of 8 years, some 14 000 have been killed as a result of the Donbas war. Russia is not starting a war, they are putting an end to one that began 8 years ago
    3
  8050.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "people were not born to serve dictators and their "grand visions"." Throughout 1000-2000 years of human history, most human societies had an authoritarian governments such as nobles (aristocracy), priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy). History is full of such authoritarian systems because they were stable and it worked. The elites were oftentimes well-educated and politically experienced enough to make decisions regarding the country's future, while the ignorant masses were kept far from politics. Whereas democracy actually has a history of failure. Early democracies like Athenian democracies failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, even the Republic of Rome failed. In fact, democracy wasn't even popular in outside of Greece in the ancient world. Modern Western liberal democracy is a different breed, but that means it only has 100-200 years of history and isn't guaranteed to be successful in the future. You said: "The so called "civil war" was fueled and staged by Putin," We have leaked audio recordings of Victoria Nuland talking to US ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt and they discussed which candidate they wanted to put in charge of Kiev. You said: "as was the invasion of Crimea." Crimea held a referendum where the majority (96.77%) voted to join the Russian Federation.
    3
  8051.  @andrenogueira5058  What makes you seem to think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Before 2019, everyone has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your lands and spending coin on your tourism industries. Even in education, Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, etc, are expanding overseas, and Chinese investors are buying property in other countries. So what makes you seem to think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese can be found virtually all over the world today, since we make up 20% of the world's population. As for China's political system, it has transformed China from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China products) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    3
  8052.  @andrenogueira5058  History is littered with numerous examples of authoritarian governments for the past 1000-2000 years, many of whom were stable and long-lived. Here are examples of authoritarian countries and the total duration of their reign: Achaemenid Empire (220 years), Ahom Dynasty (610 years), Akkadian Empire (180 years), Armenian Empire (618 years), Babylonian Empire (300 years), Bruneian Empire (520 years), Byzantine Empire (1123 years), Carthaginian Empire (668 years), Crimean Khanate (342 years), Dutch Empire (407 years), Egyptian Empire (473 years) and so many more! Source: Wikipedia: List of Empires Whereas modern Western Liberal Democracy only has a history of 100-200 years and is not guaranteed to be successful in the future. Already we are witnessing the decline of Western democratic institutions since their governments are unable to deliver what the ordinary people want. You said: "Two examples illustrate this perfectly: Russia and China." Before the 1917 communist revolution, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe at that time, with agriculture providing the livelihood for 80% of the population and was dominated by peasants, whose traditional household economies were extremely inefficient compared to agriculture in Western Europe or the United States. Only about 15% of the population lived in towns, and fewer than 10% worked in industry. Russia was also technologically backward and lagged far behind advanced capitalist countries like Great Britain and Germany. But after the 1917 Bolshevik revolution, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe at that time, both economically as well as militarily (that's why NATO was formed in response to rising Soviet Union might). The Soviet Union was the world's 2nd largest economy from 1960 to 1985, and the Soviets made various contributions to science and technology during its hey day. Such an ideology that transformed pre-1917 Russia from arguably Europe's poorest country into its strongest as the Soviet Union. Yet you just refuse to learn from the Soviet Union's success story? Same thing goes with China. Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today, and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China products) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. You said: "As for Ukraine and Russia, don't be fool and even more so, don't try to fool others." I give evidence to support my claims, all you do is talk your mouth off without proof. The 2014 coup d'etat wasn't even peaceful, did you see what Ukrainians did in Odessa where they set fire to the Trade Union House and many people were killed by the fumes, burnt or fell to their death trying to escape from the burning building. You said: "It was the Ukrainian people ultimately deciding and that's far more valuable than any other consideration. The Crimea referendum is a fraud and is not to be taken serious." So when the Ukrainians decide, it is democratic, but when the Crimean Referendum revealed that 97% of Crimeans voted to join the Russian Federation, suddenly that's not? Why the double standards here?
    3
  8053. @bd z Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese, in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. But then Vietnam suddenly changed its and started claiming those islands as part of Vietnam Source: 1958 Diplomatic note from Pham van Dong to Zhou Enlai wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg Why Vietnam politician can just suddenly change their mind and break their words like this?
    3
  8054.  @michaelkatz275  If that really was the case, then why is it that the 10% of people polled in China thinking China is on the wrong direction exist at all? Shouldn't it be 100% agreement if the case was as you described?
    3
  8055.  @yuanfangli9272  China's current political model, "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics" under President Xi and the Communist Party, closely emulates the authoritarian political system of 5,000 years of Chinese history. For thousands of years, China has always been ruled under a strong central government under the Emperor and the Imperial Court, so why do you want China to abandon our current political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    3
  8056.  @zackk4969  How is Zhao Ting a sensitive word? And aren't you typing it on YouTube, then why shame on China for what?
    3
  8057.  @zackk4969  "神州 Shenzhou Chiina is full of shxt" So you are clearly anti-China and you look down on Chinese athletes, is that what you're saying?
    3
  8058.  @yuanfangli9272  Why do you keep on telling us "let the Chinese vote"? You bring up thousands of years of history, but throughout China's history, China has never been under Western brand of democracy, then why are you using Western democracy to be judge China? Nowhere in China's 5,000 years of history has China truly been a Western liberal democracy, then why should China abandon our political system and adopt liberal democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    3
  8059. @Sheriff Lobo You said: "that's right. Many Chinese roads and tunnels collapse." A building in Miami literally collapsed. Video: Video Shows Moment of Miami Building Collapse | WSJ youtu.be/iO9kjwo4x-0
    3
  8060.  @zackk4969  Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that the cost of living in America is kept lower than it should be. Think about the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent elsewhere on other things like cars, housing, luxury brands, tuition fees, rent, bills, etc. Isn't that why many Americans often flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money?
    3
  8061.  @Carbuncle0168  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952-1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983-1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965-1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965-1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    3
  8062. @Sheriff Lobo What was the name of the very famous photography studio that you went to?
    3
  8063.  @Carbuncle0168  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is the real threat to global peace and prosperity here.
    3
  8064.  @zackk4969  You can't refute my points so you resort to hurling personal insults against me for my views, just because my views happen to differ from yours? Why not attack my points instead of attacking me personally?
    3
  8065.  @MykeLewisMusic  I'm glad you see through the irony of the U.S being a hegemonic warmonger, yet accusing China of global domination aspirations, and found humor at the sheer ridiculity of it all.
    3
  8066.  @JGalt-em4xu  Just in case you want to check, here's Nathan Rich explaining the real reason why Facebook is blocked in China. Video: The REAL Reason Facebook is banned in China youtu.be/f2srfDwM2sQ (By Nathan Rich)
    3
  8067.  @GMK189-f2k  How am I arguing with myself? What happened to your earlier comments on this thread?
    3
  8068. Canada failed to understand who Meng Wanzhou really is, before agreeing to the US demand to extradite her. This shows that when USA ask you to extradite someone, please research who the person is before committing to the US demands.
    3
  8069. The West is driven by Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (phobia of being overrun by Asians)
    3
  8070. Agreed. Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out is because of perceived American support. However, it's no secret today that the United States is in decline and China is rising. As long as peace prevails, the United States will eventually weaken to the point when they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise. When that happens, Taiwan's backing would be gone, and with the U.S out of the equation, reunification with the mainland would occur. Time is on China's side. As long as the mainland is patient and doesn't get sucked into a war, Taiwan will eventually be reunified with the mainland, once their perceived U.S backing is gone.
    3
  8071.  @everythingandmore5537  A vetting committee is necessary because what if a HK separatist gotten selected as a candidate? Hong Kong is expected to eventually be fully returned back to China by 2047 once the Sino-British declaration expires 50 years after the 1997 handover.
    3
  8072.  @robertjustinoff845  "You have also had that terrible nuclear disaster at Chernobyl in the 1980s." Chernobyl is not a nuclear strike. If you're counting this, then are you saying that Fukushima nuclear disaster is also a nuclear strike by Japan on itself? "Oh, but your not allowed to know about that disaster because your Russian and you live in an autocratic dictatorship state." What on Earth makes you think I am Russian?
    3
  8073.  @christopherhill3067  There were ongoing peace talks between Moscow and Kiev at that time, and the withdrawal of Russian forces from the Kiev region is a gesture of goodwill to create favorable conditions for Russia-Ukraine talks according to Kremlin spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov.
    3
  8074.  @jerzbondon  Do you label others as trolls just because we take a different view from you? Brave New Europe has an article entitled: Peace for Ukraine which is a detailed reconstruction of the Ukrainian-Russian peace negotiations in March 2022, which explicitly states that Putin withdrew Russian forces from Kiev as a gesture of goodwill. "On March 28, Putin, as a sign of goodwill and in support of the peace negotiations, declared readiness to withdraw troops from the Kharkov area and the Kiev area; this apparently occurred even before his public announcement." – Brave New Europe: Peace for Ukraine The report is authored by a former UN Assistant Secretary-General, Michael von der Schulenburg.
    3
  8075. Colour revolutions (orchestrated by the US) have been initiated in the Tiananmen Square before, but they failed nevertheless. That's what happens when you become an ally of the US.
    3
  8076.  @schmidcl77  As Kissinger put it ""To be an enemy of the US is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal." Look at South Vietnam before the US withdrawal from Saigon at the end of the Vietnam War.
    3
  8077.  Apple Bee  Like Canada, USA claims they have independent judicial system, but Justice Amy Coney Barrett been sworn into US Supreme Court in just 4 weeks. Looks like Donald Trump will have another supporter for his case when they finally prosecute Trump for tax evasion.
    3
  8078.  @dawei666  So what's Meng's actual crime and where is the evidence? Meng (or rather Huawei) been accused of violating US sanctions on Iran, but it turns out that Canada violates US sanctions on Iran too. I mean, Meng's been arrested since 2018 and its already 2020 and what have the Canadians been doing for the last 2 years? Need time to fabricate false evidence against Meng?
    3
  8079.  @youtubeshadowbannedme  who says that Huoshenshan and Leishenshan don't treat people? There's so many videos of Chinese doctors and nurses in those hospitals treating patients, well-equipped with face masks, gloves, goggles, PPE suits (with hoods) but look at Western doctors and nurses and they look ill-equipped to deal with the virus.
    3
  8080. China has 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans to chart the country's course and by abolishing the term limits, our leaders can remain in power long-term to see these plans bloom and come to fruition in 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. Whereas the U.S president has to step down after 4-8 years so they are unable to make long-term plans that span 10 years or more for America's future.
    3
  8081.  @dave5065  Making stereotype of Chinese as laundrymen?
    3
  8082. F-16s are Western equipment. None of Ukraine's "high level" troops are capable of piloting F-16s. They have to learn from scratch how to fly these aircraft.
    3
  8083.  @oliveweir8508  If the Hong Kong government decides to do so, they'll still need to make the housing units affordable to the masses. Building new houses doesn't solve the problem unless the new houses are affordable, otherwise the Hong Kong property tycoons would just snap up the newly built real estate for their investments.
    3
  8084. China should follow our own path to success, not just blindly copy Western government system.
    3
  8085.  @thomaslau1214  China sees win-win cooperation for mutual gain. The U.S only sees a zero sum game.
    3
  8086.  @MarkYeung1  But why would Russia return those 5 oblasts? They've shed too much blood and lost so many lives for those territory, then why would they return those lands to Ukraine? Furthermore, Russia held referendums in those regions and all 5 oblasts voted to join the Russian Federation.
    3
  8087.  @MarkYeung1  It's because China wants to maintain a good relation with Ukraine, that's why China is not recognizing those oblasts as Russian territory. But in time, global recognition of those oblasts (together with Crimea) as Russian territory will be inevitable. Zelenskyy has no choice but to sue for peace but when they do, they lose the right to claim those oblasts. There's no way Russia is going to give up territory that they shed blood and lost lives over.
    3
  8088.  @MarkYeung1  Since you brought China into the discussion, then according to the Republic of China 🇹🇼 constitution, Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, etc) as part of their territory. Taiwan also claims all of Mongolia (i.e Outer Mongolia) as part of ROC territory, as well as pieces of land that's currently under the control of Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. But do the rest of the world recognize Taiwan's claim to all of mainland China, Mongolia and so on? The answer is no. So most likely the same thing is going to happen with Ukraine. Give it some times, and once Russia achieves victory over Ukraine, then whatever's left of Ukraine will definitely not include those oblasts.
    3
  8089.  @alessandrog1036  Absolutely agreed. Once Ukraine formally signs the surrender treaty and relinquish its claim over those territories, China would probably be among the first to recognize those territories as Russian. Mark may not know the history of Russia and Ukraine. Territories like Crimea was originally part of Russia until the Bolsheviks transferred Crimea to Ukraine in 1954 to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's return to Russia.
    3
  8090.  @maddexq9107  Taiwan is suffering under democracy, look at the Taiwan parliament members throwing chairs and water balloons at each other at 8:21 of John Oliver's video.
    3
  8091. One day in the future, the phones will finally be both designed and manufactured in China.
    3
  8092.  @pn9959  Source: Wikipedia: Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident
    3
  8093. @PowerGuy1 As for "liking democracy", many Filipinos (but not all) still suffer from the "colonial mentality" that's afflicted many former colonies long after decolonization. The colonial education system was designed to portray the colonizer's motives as beneficial to the colonized, and to teach that Anglo-Saxon culture is inherently superior to any other "non-white" culture. As a result, even after the Americans have decolonized from the Philippines, the "decolonization of the mind" is still ongoing to heal the mental damage inflicted on the minds of the colonized.
    3
  8094.  @Ace-mw9pm  You said: "if the embargo didn't benefit china then who did it benefit? " In 1940 Japan invaded French Indochina in an effort to embargo all imports into China, including war supplies purchased from the U.S. This move prompted the United States to embargo all oil exports. ... Source: Wikipedia: Events leading to the attack on Pearl Harbor So it appears that the U.S imposed embargo on Japan for the sake of French Indochina. Also, we've already gone through the fact that China fought Japan for 14 years (which severely weakened the Japanese forces) whereas U.S fought Japan for only 3 years (with Chinese aid) then how can you claim that the U.S saved China? The U.S only joined in WW2 because Pearl Harbor was bombed, not for China's sake.
    3
  8095.  @barrywhite1770  Again, what do you mean that democracies are always more stable in the long run? If we look back in history by 1000-2000 years, we can see that most successful human civilizations are overwhelmingly authoritarian forms of government. Here are some examples of historical authoritarian governments and the duration of their rule. -Achaemenid Empire (220 years) -Akkadian Empire (180 years) -Aztec Empire (93 years) -Babylonian Empire (300 years) -British Empire (394 years) -Byzantine Empire (1123 years) -Carthaginian Empire (668 years) -Dutch Empire (407 years) -Egyptian Empire (473 years) -French colonial empire (446 years) .... Source: Wikipedia: List of empires On the other hand, Western democracy only has a history of around 100-200 years, so already it's not proven that democracies are always more stable in the long term, do you actually have any examples to illustrate your point? You said: "What I meant by stability, though, is the tendency for authoritarian governments to make mistakes that severely impact the citizens and result in violent overthrows of the government." That does happen throughout history, but if we look at my above examples, many authoritarian empires lasted at some 100-200 years or more. Some empires are short-lived, but many others are long-lived, so it doesn't prove that democracies are always more stable in the long run compared to other forms of governments. This is what our history is telling us, that for 1000-2000 years, authoritarian forms of government were more stable and long-lived than the 100-200 years of Western democracy. You said: "The west has a bottom up economy and has produced more innovation and excess than any economy in human history." I disagree with your claim that the Western democracies have produced more innovation than any economy in human history. Chinese have previously invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier, and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. So clearly authoritarian forms of government were capable of innovation as well.
    3
  8096. Hong Kong will eventually be fully returned back to China by 2047 anyway, once the Sino-British declaration expires after 99 years.
    3
  8097.  @MrJonbelt  Spavors has been convicted of espionage and sentenced to 11 years jail in court. Korvig has also been charged with spying. Their cases are different from Meng Wanzhou's arbitrary detention.
    3
  8098. During his visits to New Delhi, Chinese premier Zhou Enlai proposed the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence 和平共处五项原则 in order to define China-India relations and to negotiate to settle our border dispute peacefully. But Indian PM Nehru refused negotiations, and pursued an aggressive "Forward Policy" of building military bases at our disputed border, sometimes even extending across the international line and into actual Chinese territory. In the end, China has no choice but to retaliate against Indian aggression.
    3
  8099.  @mathewg5884  Second Thomas Shoal has no artificial islands, what are you talking about? The fact that Philippines had to park a rusty ship to stake its claim, just goes to show that it's not even Philippine territory in the first place.
    3
  8100. If the leader shown to be capable, then I personally see nothing wrong with leaving him in power to maximise the benefits to China. China should follow our own form of government, instead of just blindly copying Western form of government with presidential term limits.
    3
  8101. Why is there a need to limit how powerful your leader can be? There are powerful leaders that such as Lee Kuan Yew that turn Singapore from fishing village nation to 1st world country. Even South Korean dictator Park Chung Hee ruled with iron fist, but brought much progress and prosperity to South Korea, and Park has been ranked by the public as the greatest South Korean president despite his controversy. Only Westerner government system believe in presidential term limit, but it doesn't mean China has to follow the West. Such leader like President Xi are willing to tackle the notorious problem of corruption in the communist party, and is rare opportunity, so it would be better if he remained in power to maximise benefits to China.
    3
  8102. China has 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans to map out China's future and specific goals to achieve in 2020, 2030, 2050, so China needs strong leader, and having no president term limit allows him to see our plans to fruition. But countries like USA have presidential term limits (4-8 years) so they only plan short term, until their term is over, because there's no guarantee that they'll be in power after that.
    3
  8103.  @Hanabis924  So you're labelling China as authoritarian regime, yet China is the one without a vaccine mandate, and it's those Canadian truckers protesting against vaccine mandates that are purportedly having their bank accounts frozen, just for protesting as their given right as Canadians. Aren't you seemingly applying double standards here?
    3
  8104. What if Cambridge decides to cancels O-levels or A-levels this year, due to numerous schools worldwide being affected by the coronavirus? Will all the Singaporean kids studying be in vain?
    3
  8105. Remember that North Korea is nuclear armed state. China doesn't want to push North Korea over the edge, and for East Asia to become engulfed in war, like Middle East. The government is against N. Korea missile testing, but wants to resolve the issue peacefully, instead of through conflict. Our growing economies in East Asia are at stake here, if war breaks out in East Asia.
    3
  8106.  Scott Mayfield  Huawei overtook Apple as the world's 2nd largest smartphone maker, only just behind Samsung. That's why President Trump wants to strike a blow at China and Huawei.
    3
  8107. Alex This laowhy come to China and complain incessantly all the time about China, then why you want him to come to Vietnam? And complain about your country as well?
    3
  8108. Come to think of it, Cyrus' videos often have phrases like "You Won't Believe What Happened" or "NASA is in Shock!", or "Piers Morgan Shocked..." in their titles.
    3
  8109.  @HarrySerpanos  China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain, whereas the United States only sees a zero sum game.
    3
  8110. In some cases, having a more authoritarian form of government is more suitable for a country better than a Western-style democracy. For example, USA is seeing a surge in Covid-19 cases, threatening to overwhelm their healthcare system, whereas in China for example, the government is doing all it can to curb the spread of Covid-19.
    3
  8111.  @tanyaforostyan7069  How are my timelines confused? Russian forces were deployed near Kiev at the start of the special military operation. As part of Russian-Ukraine peace talks in Istanbul, Turkiye, Russia decided to withdraw its forces from Kiev as a gesture of goodwill, in order to create the conditions necessary for peace talks to continue. Where did I mess up my timelines?
    3
  8112.  @robertscott961  Putin said that Russia wasn't going to invade Ukraine as long as Nato stops its eastward expansion right up to Russia's doorstep. Because Nato is not a defensive alliance in Russian eyes.
    3
  8113. +Jahmil Manimtim According to the following source: The Philippines gained independence in 1946, but when nationalists within the Philippine government wanted to claim the Spratlys, their American advisors discouraged them. The Spanish-American treaty of 1898 made it clear that the western limit of the Philippines Islands did not include the Spratlys. Source: books.google.com/books?id=CNVf9R_L5FAC&pg=PA11&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false So why you Philippines still claim Spratly Islands when it wasn't part of your 1898 Treaty of Spain?
    3
  8114. +Jahmil Manimtim Hawaii is in the Pacific Ocean and nowhere near US mainland, yet Hawaii is one of 50 US states. The Falkland Islands are British territory, yet the Falkland Islands are located closer to South America. So what makes you think distance alone counts for claiming territory? Philippines gained independence in 1946, and Republic of China published 11 Dash Line in 1947, and Philippines did not protest China's claim. Even the Americans supported China's claim, and sent US warships like USS Decker (DE-47) to help China liberate South China Sea Islands from Japanese rule. and was renamed ROCS Tai Ping 太平. One of the SCS islands (Itu Aba island) was even renamed Taiping Island in honor of the ship. USS Decker (DE-47) Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Decker_(DE-47)
    3
  8115. +In Friends We Trust Republic of China published the 11-Dash Line back in 1947 and back then, USA approved of China's claim and Philippines did not object to China's claim. In 1958, Vietnamese PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese, in a diplomatic letter he sent to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. _1958 diplomatic note from Phạm Văn Đồng to Zhou Enlai._Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But in that same year, Vietnam suddenly change its mind, and broke its agreement and started contesting China for those territory. Why is Vietnam politician suddenly allowed to change his mind and ignore previous agreements? You're saying that China has already militarized Scarborough Shoal? As far as I know, Scarborough Shoal is NOT an island and its area is mostly submerged underwater. The shoal's highest point, South Rock, is a mere 1.8 m above sea-level at high tide, which means the highest point of Scarborough Shoal is only about the height of a tall man (1.8 m) and that's during high tide! So you're calling that an Island? How is it possible that China has already militarized Scarborough Shoal? Can you show pictures of Chinese "bases" in Scarborough Shoal to support your claims? Maybe the government built a super secret, high tech, underwater submarine base!
    3
  8116. +In Friends We Trust If Philippines turns to China then what's wrong with that? Do you know historically what the Americans did to Philippines during the American-Philippine war? The Americans had initially promised Philippines independence from Spain, but instead, America took control of Philippines and the American-Philippine war was fought where only 4,000 American soldiers died, whereas 20,000 Filipinos soldiers died and a whopping 250,000 Filipino civilians died. The Philippine American War-The Shocking Truth video: youtube.com/watch?v=bN2wrZGcs8s&t=299 In the aftermath of the war, Philippines became an American colony, up till 1946, when Philippines finally gained independence from America. So I can also claim that the Philippines have been brainwashed by their American colonial masters (and that's why most Filipinos speak good English) and despite what the Americans did to them, many Filipinos still blindly support USA. But the new Philippines President Duterte is a staunch anti-America, since he knows what the USA did to Philippines.
    3
  8117. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    3
  8118. @Eric Lee Granted, the Chinese Communist Party is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    3
  8119.  @MarkYeung1  "The HK government must bear some responsibility of the unrest." The Hong Kong Extradition Bill was meant to cover up the legal loophole of someone committing a crime elsewhere and then escaping to Hong Kong to evade extradition. By bearing responsibility, are you saying that Hong Kong government is wrong for trying to seek justice for the poor pregnant girl who was murdered in Taiwan by her boyfriend? Also earlier you clearly blamed mainland China as the cause of the riots (you said: "China has cost (I think you meant "caused") the riots in Hong Kong by imposing the extradition agreement." then how is mainland China to blame? You said: "The unpopularity of Hong Kong government is well know (ask Cyrus)." Why should I ask an American living in Canada about the unpopularity of Hong Kong government? You said: "Not surprisingly Carrie Lam didn't seek for a second term." Previously, Carrie Lam had won the three-way 2017 Chief Executive election garnering 777 out of 1200 votes, and Beijing did not cast any votes in Hong Kong's election. Since she's not seeking a second term, this implies she's not a Beijing puppet after all, and that Beijing did not force her to remain in power as a so-called puppet. You said: "神州 Shenzhou Violence in protest is wrong and should be punished. But if a government cannot solve its extradition issues, it's your own fault." How is it my own fault? Do the Hong Kong rioters even understand what the extradition bill is for? Have they read its contents and understood them before protesting? And why is it after the bill was scrapped, the protests and riots in Hong Kong still continued?
    3
  8120.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Hong Kong people knows what the extradition bill was for. The HK government didn't." The Hong Kong government literally proposed the extradition bill themselves, what makes you think they don't know what the bill is for? It's so that people who commit crimes elsewhere and flee to Hong Kong, can be extradited to face justice for their crimes. If the ordinary Hong Kong person knew it, they would permit the bill to be implemented because it would cover up this legal loophole. But now that the bill is scrapped, there's no justice for the victim's family, since Hong Kong courts are powerless to convict crimes that occurred outside of Hong Kong. And even after the bill was scrapped, the protests and riots continued in Hong Kong, so did the people even know what they were protesting against in the first place? Because of their actions, now the Hong Kong murderer, surname Chan, is allowed to roam free, do they understand the consequences of their actions at all?
    3
  8121.  @MarkYeung1  For what reason do you keep on bringing up Australia and China? Both our countries have an existing extradition treaty (The Treaty on Extradition Between Australia and the People's Republic of China signed on 6 September 2007) then how else can Hong Kong and Taiwan solve the problems of extradition without a treaty? Why bring up Australia and China as an example in the first place to compare?
    3
  8122.  @KuangWen0  Where's your evidence that the Great Chinese Famine was mainly caused by wrong policy and partly because of weather? You claimed if farmers were allowed to make their own product, so many people wouldn't have died, but this is just your own speculation without proof. The Great Leap Forward represented China's attempt to industrialise from a agrarian country, would you have preferred China to remain an agricultural country forever? China's 1958 steel output was 5.9 million tonnes and by 1965 the steel output was 12.2 million tonnes.
    3
  8123.  @MarkYeung1  If you ask mainland Chinese, they will readily tell you the good that Chairman Mao Zedong did for China. Before the communists came to power, China was a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period, but Chairman Mao succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country under communism and he proclaimed the founding the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949. If not for Chairman Mao, China would most likely still be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today. Many mainland Chinese travel to Mao Zedong's birthplace in Shaoshan to celebrate the anniversary of Mao's birthday, and many people in China recognize Mao's contributions to China's founding. It's mostly the overseas Chinese that hold a negative opinion of our founding father, because they don't understand the true extent of what Mao did for China.
    3
  8124.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwanese wants status quote." And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their constitution, and declaring independence would be taken as changing the status quo, in which majority of the people of Taiwan do not support.
    3
  8125.  @KuangWen0  大跃进是在1958年至1960年。1982年的事跟大跃进有什么关系？
    3
  8126.  @KuangWen0  The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, was an attempt by Chairman Mao to get rid of cultures that were holding back China's development. Many superstitious beliefs by common folk that are harmful to society were abolished during this period. The revolution broke the barrier between the elite class and poor people and freed knowledge to everyone. Poor people living in rural China could gain access to education and better healthcare. Women were grant equal rights to education as men, and given a similar level of respect as their male counterparts, in fact, many Cultural Revolution Posters prominently feature women working alongside men in agriculture and industry. As Mao Zedong said: "Women hold up half the sky." (妇女能顶半边天)
    3
  8127.  @KuangWen0  小龙就是小龙，不是大龙。小龙能跑得快是因为人比较少，大龙有很多人所以速度比较慢。 As for GDP per capita between mainland China and the Four Dragons, that's not exactly a fair comparison in itself. Mainland China is home to the largest population in the world, whereas the population of Hong Kong, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea are much smaller. So on a per capita basis, if you divide China's GDP by our enormous population, then of course you'll arrive at a GDP per capita that's lower for mainland China than for the Four Dragons. Look at India, the world's 2nd most populous country after China, and their GDP per capita is even lower than China, despite India proclaiming itself the world's largest democracy.
    3
  8128.  @耳東耳 说的对，而且不只是西方人，有不少华侨华人从小受西方的教育就开始对祖国有偏见，他们受苦一种殖民思想，是个内部化人们而感到的种族或文化自卑的态度殖民化。这与这样的信念相对应，即殖民者的文化价值天生就高于自己的价值。
    3
  8129.  @MarkYeung1  Mao Zedong himself made a self-criticism and stepped down as state Chairman after the Great Chinese Famine. But again, I've pointed how bad weather like the 1958 Yellow River flood caused destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation, so it wasn't his fault.
    3
  8130. What is the federal government doing? Video: Chinese donate 1,000 ventilators to US, says New York governor youtu.be/x_D5Ggj69Rw
    3
  8131.  General G. Washington  Carrie Lam's resignation does not solve the problem, it will only make the problem worst. Carrie Lam should remain in power and fix this problem she started herself, instead of taking the easy way out by resigning.
    3
  8132. In mountainous terrain Chinese Airforce manufacture our own combat UAVs like Caihong-5, which has been compared with USA's Reaper drone. But in December 2017, India crashed a Israeli-made drone after trespassing in Chinese airspace.
    3
  8133. NeelotpalMRINAL The PLA is still the world's largest land army. Exactly what do you know about Chinese war tactics? So many factors can decide the outcome of war. The geography, the weather, supply lines, technology, morale, diplomacy, economics, etc. Ancient Chinese war strategists wrote detailed military manuals, like Sun Zi's The Art of War, since thousands of years ago, yet his teachings are still being taught in modern military academies.
    3
  8134. China wants to make Asia strong, by building infrastructure in less develop countries like Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Maldives, etc. China always welcome India's participation in the Belt and Road Initiative, for mutual benefit and prosperity for our countries. But India reject this offer.
    3
  8135. You act like India conducts itself transparently in the first place. What about Indian Army sending troops across the border to obstruct road construction efforts at Doklam? Doklam lies on the China-Bhutan border, not the India-China border, so it should be an bilateral issue between China and Bhutan, isn't it? When did China disregard India's claim on Jammu and Kashmir? Chinese workers are only building infrastructure in Kashmir, and China is not claiming that territory as part of China. Once the construction is complete, Chinese workers will vacate the lands and leave it for whomever wants possession of those territory. So how is China disregarding Jammu and Kashmir? In China's case for example, India does business with Taiwan, but does China complain about India doing business with Taiwan? What has South China Sea got to do with India then? India does not claim territory from South China Sea, and neither does Japan, or USA for that matter, so what has SCS issue got to do with those countries at all here? In fact, India doesn't claim Indian Ocean as part of its territory, so why can't Chinese ships and submarines patrol the Indian Ocean? China has 5000 years of history, and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilizations still alive today, whereas other great civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have long since faded to history. China has long history of warfare and military manuals like Sun Zi's The Art of War 孙子兵法 have been written thousands of years ago, but still being taught today in modern military academies. Why is mechanized warfare unfeasible in mountainous region, simply because the video above says so? China has conducted several live-fire exercise and military drills in Tibet, making use of light tanks like VT5 light combat tank. In fact, it is only after the Tibet live-fire exercise, did Indian army realize that it does not have light tanks of its own for combat in mountainous terrain. For mountainous combat scenarios, China also have access to aerial units like our very own combat UAVs, like CaiHong-5, which has been compared to the US's Reaper drone, and allows China to conduct surveillance and light combat operations along Himalayas. China also have world's longest range ICBM, DF-41, with 13,000 to 15,000 km range, allowing it to literally fly over the Himalayan mountain range. China also have anti-satellite missiles that can take out Indian military satellites in space, which will hamper its coordination on the ground and put Indian army at a disadvantage. I haven't even said anything about Pakistan, except for the fact that China does business with them. If Indians want to continue to divide Asia, by fighting with Pakistan all the time, then how is Asia going to become strong again? By fighting amongst themselves? China is helping to stabilize Pakistan government and provide jobs for its people through economic corridor project and by developing Gwadar port. Pakistan is India's brother state, sharing the same history (Mughal rule, British rule, etc) right up the British India's partitioning in 1947, so why can't Pakistan claim Jammu and Kashmir region as part of its territory? From what I know, most of the people living in J & K are Muslims too.
    3
  8136. Aryavarta Bharat China does not lecture what you do in Jammu and Kashmir, but does that mean Chinese workers can't build roads there? What gives you Indian soldiers the right to obstruct PLA road construction efforts in Doklam then? Doklam is located on Bhutan-China border, not Indian-China border yet Indian troops can interfere with this? India does not claim Doklam as part of its territory, so what gives you Indians the right to lecture Chinese about Doklam then? Pakistan is its own sovereign country as recognised by India, so why can't China conduct bilateral relations with Pakistan, country to country? Like I said earlier, why you oppose your brother state Pakistan and want to see its downfall? If Pakistan collapse, then it's neighbours like India, China, Afghanistan, etc will be flooded by mass refugees, and we don't want that to happen, so China help build infrastructure in Pakistan through economic corridor project to create jobs for the people and stabilise its economy.
    3
  8137. +Aryavart Bharat Bangladesh was still legally part of Pakistan, and by joining in, India is taking sides in civil war against West Pakistan. Since you participated in this Pakistan internal civil war against Pakistan, then why do you think Pakistan won't be hostile against you? People join the terrorists because they are poor, jobless, and angry at their government, or other country like USA for intervening in their wars. The US approach to dealing with terrorism is to bomb cities in Middle East, and this only generates more resentment against USA, so the people flock to join terrorists. This method clearly does not solve the problem of terrorism. Otherwise, why USA fight wars in Middle East for over 15 years without end? Why are there more terrorist groups appearing, like ISIL? China's approach is different from USA. China is investing in Pakistan and building infrastructure, which create jobs for people so that they will have work to do and money to earn, instead of joining the extremists. The government becomes more stable as the economy develops, and becomes more interested in spending money in growing its economy, instead of investing in terrorist activity. Isn't this a much better solution, then the US approach to terrorism? If using the same method again and again doesn't work, then why not try a new approach instead? Its crazy to repeat the same method again and again, and somehow expect a different outcome.
    3
  8138. Rajan A Thevar The entire Pakistan was a part of "Bharat" but in the end, it was Indian leaders like PM Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi, that choose to give away territory to form Pakistan as its own sovereign state. It was your leaders decision too, to support Bangladesh Independence from East Pakistan, creating another sovereign country. Nothing to do with China or me for that matter, that your great "Bharat" has now fragmented into different states and fighting amongst themselves. China today fights so hard to regain control of Hong Kong and Taiwan, because we don't want to end up what happened to the great "Bharat", which is now divided into several states. And its your own sense of superiority complex, that if you think that Bharat goes, then so does the entire human race. If India can claim territories based on "The Great Bharat" then can't Pakistan claim territories too, since its history parallels that of India? Then why can't China claim territory based on Qing Dynasty maps and treaties then?
    3
  8139. China's DF-41 is capable of multiple independent reentry vehicle (MIRV) deployment, of up to 10 warheads with each single launch, making it extremely difficult to intercept. On the other hand, Agni V has not demonstrated MIRV capability, so its possible for Chinese anti-missile systems to intercept it, as it is only a single warhead. Here is a video of DF-41 launched from train on a railway line Video:China missile tests DF-41 launch from railroad train youtube.com/watch?v=h2kjMctT8yU
    3
  8140.  @mikaelafrias7786  I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience.) Video: youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA
    3
  8141.  @MarkYeung1  "China has recognized Ukraine's independence since 1992." China still does that today. According to the Embassy of Ukraine in the People's Republic of China: "China invariably supports Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Ukraine remains firmly committed to “one China” policy. Given ongoing transformation and reforms in Ukraine in recent years, the two sides are currently undertaking measures aimed at launching a new phase of development of bilateral relations with the view to bringing them up at a new level." - Embassy of Ukraine in PRC China is on friendly terms with both Ukraine and Russia so why can't China continue to trade with both sides?
    3
  8142.  @MarkYeung1  "The fact that Xi decided to skip the G20 summit in India is a slap to the face of India." Not true. President Xi and Prime Minister Modi already had a prior meeting (August 24) to discuss the border issues, so there is no urgent need for Xi and Modi to meet again face-to-face so soon. Also, Putin has also decided to skip the G20 meeting, so most likely Xi is doing so in support of Putin.
    3
  8143.  @MarkYeung1  "Why are you single out the United States ?" Well, because the United States is the largest provider of military assistance to Ukraine (having committed $43.7 billion since the start of the Biden administration). This is the biggest proof of a country supporting war, yet you seem to think China is doing so just by trading with Russia?
    3
  8144.  @billyehh  If your company want to come to China and set up shop here, then you're required to comply with Chinese laws while in China. But if you disagree with our terms, your company is free to pack their bags and take their business elsewhere. Who are you to tell China how to conduct business in our country?
    3
  8145. It's each country's choice. But Pakistan and India have been fighting each other for about 70 years already. Why not try mending relations instead of continuing the hate? China's Pakistan economic corridor project represents a rare opportunity for both countries to finally put aside their differences and cooperate to repair their relations.
    3
  8146.  @wnklee6878  Both are bad, but trade war is still preferable to military war. At least Trump didn't care about Hong Kong, Xinjiang and other internal issues of China, he's just concerned about his economic deal with China. But the new Biden administration not only pursue so-call "human rights issue" with China, but Biden did not remove any of Trump's previous tariffs or sanctions.
    3
  8147.  @Jeff_the_Hobo  Those Uighur neighborhoods are very old and rundown, so Chinese government is modernizing the region by building proper paved roads, installing running water, gas and electricity, streetlamps, and other modern amenities. Otherwise, you want the Uighurs to live in their poor derelict neighborhoods forever?
    3
  8148. Westerners always complain about how Chinese people are rude, spit in public, jaywalk, disobey traffic laws, drive through red lights, etc, so what China's social credit system hopes to achieve is to discourage such behavior and prevent such people with low scores from becoming a menace on trains, or buying airplane tickets to become a menace in other countries. But its not the end of the world if your social credit falls too low and there are numerous ways to increase your social credit score to a more acceptable level.
    3
  8149. The thing is, the collapse of the US dollar hegemony may not necessarily be bad for the USA. It just means that the U.S can no longer print money with impunity or threaten countries with sanctions or seizing foreign assets.
    3
  8150. Seems like you know how China is often portrayed unfairly in the media in the West. Yet when it comes to the same media's portrayal of Russia, you seem to believe that Russia is losing?
    3
  8151.  @auroragb  According to World Tourism Rankings, as of 2015, China is the world's 4th most visited country after France, Spain and United States, seeing some 60.7 million international visitors annually. Source: World Tourism rankings wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings China is also the most popular tourist destination in Asia, surpassing even Japan, Korea, Thailand, India, and so on. 1. China (60.7 million) 2. Thailand (35.4 million) 3. Japan (28.7 million) 4. Hong Kong (27.9 million) 5. Malaysia (26.0 million) 6. Macau (17.3 million)
    3
  8152.  @auroragb  Did you even read Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條) yourself before quoting it? Article 45 states the following: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." - Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 So CCP is not doing anything wrong here by appointing the candidates for Hong Kong elections. What's the basic definition of democracy? Answer: It's that the people get to vote for their favorite leaders, and Hong Kong is a democracy, since Hong Kong Chief Executive is selected by people of Hong Kong, and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong elections. So what is this about being lied to by the CCP? Which Hong Kong Basic Law did CCP allegedly violated you tell me?
    3
  8153.  @auroragb   I did not post any comment to @高从心 and neither did I mention anything at all about Taiwan, until you suddenly remarked that I believed Taiwan is part of China, which it clearly is. If you agree as well that Taiwan is part of China, then what's the problem?
    3
  8154.  @auroragb  Who says I replied to you replying to 高从心 discussing Taiwan? I never even mentioned Taiwan at all, until you suddenly remarked that I believed Taiwan is part of China, which it clearly is. If you agree as well that Taiwan is part of China, then what seems to be the problem?
    3
  8155.  @anonsaccount1562  Which "countries" is China occupying? Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongol Genghis Khan conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China, and then incorporated those territories into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing centuries later during the Qing Dynasty China. Xinjiang was first referred to as "Xiyu" (Chinese: 西域) under the Han dynasty, which drove the Xiongnu out of the Tarim Basin in 60 BCE (Han–Xiongnu War) in an effort to build and secure the profitable Silk Road. So Xinjiang was part of China since before Jesus Christ himself was even born!
    3
  8156.  @anonsaccount1562  Peace in British Raj? The British executed Indian rebels in a gruesome manner, by tying up Indians to the front of cannons, and then blasting a hole open in their chests to execute them (known as "blowing from a gun") destroying their bodies and scattering the remains over a wide area, thus preventing funeral rites of Muslims and Hindus. "India's share of the world economy when Britain arrived on its shores, was 23%. By the time the British left it was down to below 4 percent. Why? Simply because India had been governed for the benefit of Britain. Britain's rise for 200 years was financed by its depredations in India. In fact, Britain's Industrial Revolution was actually premised upon the de-industrialization of India" - Dr Shashi Tharoor. Video: Dr Shashi Tharoor MP - Britain Does Owe Reparations .youtube.com/watch?v=f7CW7S0zxv4&t=82
    3
  8157.  @anonsaccount1562  Tibetans and Chinese share a common ancestral language, which is grouped under Sino-Tibetan languages. And China today has over 50 ethnic groups including Han, Mongols, Tibetans, Uighurs, Manchu, and even some Koreans (in Northeastern China) but they are clearly all Chinese citizens isn't it? Just like the United States has Caucasian Americans (white), African Americans (black), Latin Americans (brown), Asian Americans (yellow) and Native Americans (red), yet they are all American citizens. So aren't the 50 over ethnic groups of China considered Chinese as well?
    3
  8158.  @auroragb  I did mention that China is the 4th most visited country in the world yes. But once again you are avoiding my question: "Did I ever said anything about Taiwan here in this thread?" But you suddenly started talking about me supposedly responding to 高从心 and what the OP said, but I am asking about when did I ever mention Taiwan here. Why can't you answer this simple question of mine?
    3
  8159.  @auroragb  In the past, Hong Kong was once a prosperous and thriving port city, while the mainland was still dirt-poor at that time. Today however, times have changed and Hong Kong has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan and is facing increasing competition from upcoming mainland cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian, etc. No wonder why the Hong Kong people feel like they're being left behind. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage Mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, etc, are actually prospering under authoritarian CCP rule, similar to Hong Kong prospering under authoritarian British Colonial Rule. Only when democracy is introduced to Hong Kong, did its economy began to slump and protests start appearing in the city.
    3
  8160.  @auroragb  How does CCP choose the winners and losers in Hong Kong? The Hong Kong Chief Executive is voted in by Election Committee, which consist of Hong Kong groups and all Beijing does is appoint the HK Chief Executive (as per Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45) that's all. But Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong election, so how does your statement make sense at all? For example, the current Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam was voted into power by garnering over 700 votes out of the 1200 member Election Committee, in the last Hong Kong election and Beijing did not cast any votes in Hong Kong election. So why are you claiming that CCP chooses HK winners and losers?
    3
  8161.  @auroragb  Singapore is a democracy? Singapore is ruled by authoritarian single-party PAP for its entire life as a nation. For over 50 years the PAP ruled Singapore with iron fist and Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore's founder) was a dictator who tolerated no dissidents to his rule and jailed and banished his political rivals. But under authoritarian single-party PAP rule, Singapore prospered from sleepy fishing village nation, into a world class country today with higher standards of living than its neighboring countries like Malaysia, Indonesia, etc. Similarly, China has been under authoritarian single-party CCP rule for 70 years and likewise, Hong Kong was prosperous port city while it was under authoritarian British colonial rule for over 150 years.
    3
  8162.  @auroragb  What context are you talking about? I have proven multiple times that Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong elections and your argument has been refuted throughly already. Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 does not have a time limit to granting universal suffrage to Hong Kong, so why are you imposing your own time limit here? And look at mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, etc and they are thriving under authoritarian CCP rule, whereas Hong Kong today is in an economic slump because of democracy. And even your Singapore example failed to prove anything, since Singapore is under authoritarian single-party PAP rule even till today. The opposition party in Singapore is a joke and only wastes Singapore resources by existing that's all, so isn't this all the more reason China should not adopt Western democracy?
    3
  8163.  @auroragb  The Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again, which government body is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, India, Europe and USA. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into economic powerhouse, the world's factory (Made in China), a growing scientific and technological power, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under CCP leadership, despite what Western anti-communist propaganda been denouncing all along.
    3
  8164.  @auroragb  And Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party Kuomintang rule for more than half its life! For decades, the KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist and KMT leader Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed many dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and he imposed Martial Law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan flourished and prospered in what's known as Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹) Between 1952-1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983-1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan's GDP grew by 360% between 1965-1986 and the percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965-1986. All this occurred under authoritarian single party KMT rule of Taiwan. Source: Wikipedia: Taiwan Miracle Only when democracy was introduced in 1990s (because USA threatened to cut off sales of weapons to Taiwan if KMT did not introduce political reforms) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Today, Taiwan's economy is in a slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, and Taiwan graduates are seeking job opportunities in the mainland or in Singapore. So isn't this a proof that Taiwan actually prospered under authoritarian KMT rule and suffered under democracy? Why fix something that wasn't broken? Because Westerners say so?
    3
  8165.  @auroragb  Its true that Article 45 is for 50 years, but until then, the CCP did not breach any laws in it. And your "halfway point" clearly does not exist within Article 45, so who are you to just make up an "imaginary halfway point" in Article 45 and then blame the CCP for violating this imaginary time limit made up by yourself? You have consistently failed to refute this point, and you are constantly trying to make up excuses which have all been shot down by facts. Since when does Singapore allow public protests? When is the last time Singapore had a protest you tell me? In 2008, a group of 20 people turned up at Parliament House to protest against the escalating cost of living in Singapore and the event was organised by the SDP and included their members. 18 were arrested when they refused to disperse as ordered by the police. All 20 were subsequently charged under Section 5(4)b Chapter 184 of the Miscellaneous Offences (Public and Nuisance) Act. On 12 January 2009, 2 Singaporeans staged a protest outside the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) building to voice their disapproval over the treatment of two Myanmar nationals who had their work permits cancelled. The two activists were arrested but released on bail later. Seriously, how much do you even know about Singapore's authoritarian laws? Singapore's political environment is stifling and citizens continued in 2016 to face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly. You can't even refute this simple fact.
    3
  8166.  @auroragb  Literacy rate being equated with competence only applies to democracies, because like you said, it is the ordinary people that vote in their leaders, so why do you want illiterate people participating in political elections that will affect your country's future? Or those undesirable peoples like beggars, drug addicts, drunkards, deadbeats, dissidents, and so on? What makes you think the lower rung of society will be able to make important decisions regarding the country's future? India's illiteracy rate is because of its massive population. In the past, China was once like India, a dirt-poor country with enormous population, suffering from high birth rates, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy rates and other population problems. Why allow families to raise multiple kids, only for them to starve to death, to succumb to diseases in childhood because of not enough food, not enough hospitals and not enough schools to send them to? Instead, why not focus all available resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood and get him into a good school? That's why China introduced the One-Child Policy and according to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Wikipedia: Poverty in China Look at India today and its suffering from population problems like high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, low literacy, etc, which were problems that China once suffered from. So why do you still think China should be democracy then? We've been successful following authoritarian rule unlike India and just having 96.4% literacy rate is not a reason to suddenly change to democracy.
    3
  8167.  @auroragb  My question isn't absurd, you are the one distorting it to become "dissolve people" when I clearly said no such thing. It's because you refuse to answer it properly that's why you deliberately misinterpreted it. And if you believe that people are capable of ruling themselves, then why not make everyone into the government then? Why select only a few people to govern your country, instead of making everyone the government? And Hong Kong Chief Executive is appointed by Beijing as part of the Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 like I said earlier. According to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." And like I said earlier, the UN countries voted to democratically kick ROC out of the UN security council and to recognize PRC as the legitimate China. Your countries literally voted to only recognize PRC as China, so why are you claiming that the mainland prevents TW from being represented and served by most international organizations?
    3
  8168.  @auroragb  Exactly, democracy is inefficient like you say. Why let the whole population rule, when a small number will suffice in the government? And once again, my question never said "dissolve people" you came up with the ridiculous notion yourself here because you can't admit that your countries need governments to function. Why not let the people who know how to govern, govern like I said? History has proven that much of human civilization follows some sort of authoritarian or oligarchic political systems. Political power was not concentrated in the hands of many, instead it was concentrated in the hands of the few elites, such as the nobles (aristocracy), or priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy) Such authoritarian/oligarchic systems were prevalent because they were stable, and simply because they worked. The elites were often well educated and politically savvy, often capable of making political decisions, whereas the ignorant masses were kept well away from politics. Whereas frankly speaking, democracy has a long history of failure. Proto-democracies like Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, and even Republic of Rome eventually failed. In the ancient world, Democracy was never in fact, popular outside of Greece at all, and after Rome fell, many of the individual states began to assume authoritarian rule under monarchy once again. Modern Western democracy is different but it only has 100-200 years of history to its name, so that's certainly not a guarantee for it to be successful in future. Why then should China adopt Western democracy, simply because Westerners think it is the best political system?
    3
  8169.  @auroragb  I never said China invented those things. But ancient Chinese had the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced history in their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge and information easier and cheaper. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys more safer and reliable. And Gunpowder has completely revolutionized the way modern wars are fought. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china), etc, that were in high demand by the rest of the ancient world. Why then, should we Chinese consider ourselves inferior to Westerners? The Westerners mocked Chinese history and made Chinese out to be backward and barbaric in comparison to theirs. We need to stop worshiping the Westerners and start charting our own path to success, instead of Westerners telling Chinese what to do.
    3
  8170.  @auroragb  Democracy IS inefficient like it or not. You need to spend money to host election campaigns, allocate resources and manpower for ballot boxes and count and tabulate results, just to decide which leader is most popular that's all. How is this good for the country? Some of your elected leaders even lack political experience (like President Trump for example) so why waste all that money just to get an incompetent person in power you tell me? Whereas in China, only the top elites (the Communist Party members) are voting in elections, which saves China plenty of money and resources in hosting democratic elections in the world's most populous country. If you want to participate in politics then you must join the communist party (not easy feat, you have to be top 5% in your field) and slowly work your way up to a high-ranking position, by garnering votes from other politically savvy communist party members. It's not a perfect system and it is tedious process, but it has produced politically experienced leaders such as President Xi Jinping, who has at least 30-40 years of political experience, so that's why most Chinese people believe he is competent enough to rule China. I mean, you are governing a country of 1.4 billion people (300 million for USA) so obviously, we only want the best and most competent to rule. Why the Americans allow Trump, someone with zero political experience prior, to become president and lead their country?
    3
  8171.  @auroragb  Primitive? If it's stupid but works (as it did for over 1000s of years) then in my opinion, it isn't stupid. Look at all those numerous authoritarian and oligarchic empires, for example, Achaemenid Empire, Akkadian Empire, Armenian Empire, Assyrian Empire, Aztec Empire, Babylonian Empire, Bruneian Empire, Egyptian Empire, Chinese Empire, Japanese Empire, Inca Empire, Khmer Empire, Korean Empire, Kushan Empire and like I said, authoritarian regimes are popular simply because they served as the most efficient form of political government, they were stable, and simply because they worked! Democracy was never popular outside of Greece in the ancient world, for the reasons I illustrated earlier and you claim democracies that fall are almost always conquered? Which country conquered the Republic of Rome? Or did Rome fell because democracy tore the country apart from within, as the individual states began no longer recognizing themselves as part of Rome?
    3
  8172.  @RaginYak  I mean, why don't you tell the Americans to give up their claims to Hawaii? Hawaii is out there in the Pacific Ocean, so far away from the American mainland, yet they are part of America? Or why don't you tell all non-Native Americans and Canadians to get out of America and leave the lands to the Native Americans? The Europeans colonised Americas 600 years ago, but Tibet had been part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. You just don't want to admit that Tibet was historically part of China longer than the European colonisation of America, and even today, Tibet is regarded as part of China by world leaders all over the world. US, India, Britain all betrayed Tibet? Who do you think you are? If you protest Tibet then why don't you go set yourself on fire like those self-immolating Tibetans? Just a mere 148 Tibetan self-immolated, means the entire 3 million population of Tibet must bow down to their demands? Go film yourself "self-immolating" and post it on YouTube, some you "care" so much about Tibet.
    3
  8173.  @theraven5850  Destruction of our environment? The Chinese Communist Party has contributed much to global reforestation efforts. For example, the world's largest man-made forest is Saihanba National Forest Park (塞罕坝国家森林公园) located in China. Video: Saihanba, the world's largest man-made forest youtu.be/o5xdIVvFEeo Video: Two generations spent 55 years building world's largest man-made forest in Saihanba, N. China youtu.be/3RqsUD6fyGk
    3
  8174. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilizations still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have long since faded to history.
    3
  8175.  @stunningandbrave2520  "Still trying to propagate the fallacy that this somehow means Taiwan is somehow natively part of today's China, hey?" No, Taiwan is part of China since Qing Dynasty and even today, Taiwan's constitution states that the island is part of China. I merely pointed out that the Taiwan aborigines were descended from farmers from mainland China that migrated to Taiwan around 5,000 years ago.
    3
  8176.  @bartonlee3594  I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, and I was appalled at the sheer amount of negativity that's being hurled in China's direction by Westerners. Whenever I try to bring up China's achievements under the Communist Party of China, many just laughed at me, calling me brainwashed, and some even told me to "Go back to China if you like it there!" even though most of them have never actually set foot inside China and seen what life is like here for themselves.
    3
  8177. China's supercomputer Tianhe-1 (天河-1) found that the lungs of a young American vaper hospitalized for "mysterious pneumonia" last summer could be exhibiting Covid-19 symptoms scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3079046/chinese-supercomputer-and-american-doctors-clash-over-ai
    3
  8178. Actually, Chinese government wants punish North Korea because its latest nuclear missile test coincided defiantly with the recent BRICS summit held in Xiamen, China. The UNSC sanctions serves as an good excuse for China to impose sanctions on North Korea as punishment for carrying out those missile tests held during BRICS summit. In politics, its all about the timing.
    3
  8179. @Sandor Clegane Agreed, why laowhy come to China and complain about here all the time? He doesn't look happy living in China, his enthusiasm seems false and he doesn't seem to be assimilating well into Chinese culture, so why force himself to live in China?
    3
  8180.  @darrenlongley8491  The population of Uighurs in China has actually grown from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    3
  8181.  Jeffrey Tham  "Divine Vessel" 神舟 Shenzhou is the name of the spacecraft for China's human spaceflight program. China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight, after the USA and the USSR. So I chose the name 神州 Shenzhou (a homonym) to show that China is both an ancient civilization as well as a modern space nation.
    3
  8182.  @Nesher92  Besides dominating smartphones, drones and banks, China is home to many of the world's biggest Internet companies, such as Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, Suning.com, Bytedance (Tik Tok), Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, Kuaishou, Trip.com, Pinduoduo, Sina Corp, Sohu and so on. Source: Wikipedia: List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies#List But where are the famous companies from Hong Kong and Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How can Hong Kong and Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    3
  8183.  @Nesher92  So you admit Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule for 150 years, but since Hong Kong actually developed WITHOUT democracy, then why is there a need to implement democracy in Hong Kong, when they survived? For 150 years as British, Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy, yet they actually developed, it's only after mainland China introduced democracy to Hong Kong under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, that Hong Kong people today are actually suffering under democracy. So if for a century and a half, Hong Kong survived without democracy, then why is there a sudden need to implement democracy? Because Westerners say so? Look at Hong Kong suffering under democracy today, when they thrived under authoritarian rule in the past.
    3
  8184.  @Nesher92  About the National Security Law, according to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 (香港基本法第二十三條) Hong Kong shall enact laws to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government (aka Beijing), or theft of state secrets, to prohibit foreign political organizations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region and so on. So the NPC's National Security Law is merely speeding up the process in Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 and Beijing is not violating HK Basic Law. You still haven't shown which part of Sino-British declaration that Beijing did not respect.
    3
  8185.  @s0methingmesh132  I can foresee two possibilities: a) either the upcoming Biden Administration reverse the U.S ban on semiconductor chips and let it resume in China, or… b) China develop our domestic chips ourselves. But I don't think a Biden administration will lift U.S ban on semiconductor chips, Huawei 5G, Tik Tok, WeChat, nor will Meng Wanzhou (Huawei's CFO) be released anytime soon.
    3
  8186.  @lordtutinean90  You really believe those organ-harvesting rumours? I mean, do world leaders like US President Trump, Russian President Putin, Canadian PM Trudeau, British PM Johnson, France President Macron, German Chancellor Merkel, Japanese PM Abe, Indian PM Modi, (or any other world leader) ever brought up organ harvesting to President Xi Jinping? No, because there's insufficient evidence of such activity, so why do you still believe those organ harvesting rumours?
    3
  8187.  @lordtutinean90  If other countries have sufficient evidence of organ harvesting in China, then why don't world leaders confront China about organ harvesting and bring China to court? Did you ever heard Trump talk about organ harvesting in China? Or Russian President Putin, Canadian PM Trudeau, British PM Johnson, France President Macron, German Chancellor Merkel, Japanese PM Abe, Indian PM Modi? Or any other world leader? Because there's insufficient evidence to bring China to court, why do you still believe those organ harvesting rumours then?
    3
  8188.  @ginamarievillanueva8130  The Spratly Islands was NOT PART of Philippines territory as per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America. Even American acknowledged the South China Sea Islands as part of China, because they send warships (like the USS Decker) to help China liberate those islands from Japanese rule. The US warship was renamed ROCS Taiping (太平) and one of the South China Sea Islands was renamed Taiping Island in honor of the ship that liberated it.
    3
  8189. +Narendra Modi What about USA causing trouble in Middle East? South East Asia is at least, not at war at the moment, but Middle East has been in turmoil (Gulf war, Iraq war, Afghan war, Libya war, etc) for over 15 years, because of USA intervention. Chinese don't want Asia to become like the conflicted Middle East, destroying Asia's remarkable growth these few decades. USA is using North Korea as excuse to provoke war in Asia, but China will not let USA turn peaceful Asia into war zone.
    3
  8190. @nationalghost Even after the Japanese surrendered in 1945, the communists had a strength of 1,200,000 (July 1945) whereas the KMT had a strength of 4,300,000 (June 1946) so the KMT still outnumbered the communists by at least 3 times! Yet despite this numerical superiority, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa? This shows KMT sheer incompetence in their right to rule China, even after all fighting with the Japanese ceased after the 1945 WWII surrender.
    3
  8191. @nationalghost Taiwan had been ruled by authoritarian, single-party KMT rule for more than half its life! For decades, the KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, and Chiang kai-Shek was a dictator responsible for jailing and executing his political rivals in White Terror and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years. Yet, it was under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, that Taiwan actually flourished and modernized, resulting in the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹) Between 1952 and 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 and 1986 at 6.9% and Taiwan's GDP grew by 360% between 1965 and 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 and 1986. And it was all achieved under authoritarian single-party KMT. Only when democracy was introduced to Taiwan (because the USA threatened to cut off sales of weapons to Taiwan, if KMT did not implement political reforms) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest in 1990s. Today, Taiwan's economy is in a slump, wages are stagnant, the cost of living is rising, and many Taiwan graduates are unable to find jobs, so many choose to seek employment opportunities overseas, such as in mainland China or in Singapore. So doesn't this show that democracy is not the way to go for Taiwan? Taiwan was flourishing under KMT single-party rule, so why fix something that's not broken? Because Westerners say so?
    3
  8192. @nationalghost China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has seen the rise and fall of many empires, yet survived the violent passage of time to the modern day relatively intact, when even the "democratic" Republic of Rome fell to barbarians. China has always been under authoritarian rule (and we still are today). Even the supposedly "democratic" KMT's methods are just as authoritarian, because that is Chinese culture (which you claim to admire earlier). Emperors governed ancient China and tolerated no dissidents, even artistes or poets can be executed for criticizing the emperor's laws, yet it is because of this authoritarian system that China has survived so long. Why do you get swept up by Western notions of democracy somehow being the "best" political system? Democracy has a long history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, even Republic of Rome fell. These proto-democracies did not work, and democracy was never popular outside of Greece in the ancient world. Modern Western democracy is different of course, but it only has 100-200 years of history, and it's not guaranteed to be successful in the future.
    3
  8193. @nationalghost There are many startups are popping up and disappearing in China every day. China has world's 2nd highest number of startups with a current valuation of US$1 billion or more (also known as "unicorns") Source: List of unicorn startup companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unicorn_startup_companies 1. United States (127 unicorns) 2. China (104 unicorns) <-- 3. India (23 unicorns) 4. South Korea (9 unicorns) 5. United Kingdom (8 unicorns) 6. Indonesia (4 unicorns) ... This shows that innovation is happening rapidly in China, and that Chinese R&D grants are actually paying off by producing the world's 2nd highest number of "unicorns" (defined as startup with valuation of US$1 billion or more). China is slowly but surely catching up with the United States in this field.
    3
  8194. @nationalghost  China is home to world's largest high speed railway, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very fast and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented with balancing small objects on their edges, like coins, stationery, mobile phones, in trains moving at 350 kph and the objects remained undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for a long period. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE
    3
  8195. @letsgame7460 "China also takes land as compensation" Which land has been taken by China? Which African country has become a Chinese colony, you tell me?
    3
  8196. @chip9177  Despite being accused of debt-trap diplomacy, China offers loans with lower interest rates (1.5% over 15 – 20 years) than Western loans and also comes with fewer strings attached. At times, China has even forgiven debt to African countries .
    3
  8197.  @pierremarel  There are YouTube videos available about "Paracel Island Tourism". Furthermore, the majority of the Paracel islands lie within 200 NM (nautical miles) of China's geographic baseline, so they fall within China's EEZ (exclusive economic zone) in accordance with UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea) You said: "Although I would assume there must be no strategical advantage installing a military base there when there are already surface-to-air missile sites located respectively 20 and 70 kilometers from Vietnam." I'm no military expert myself, but I presume those are land-based surface-to-air missile sites you are referring to. But a significant amount of international trade flows through the South China Sea (majority of it goes and comes from China), so China needs maritime anti-air defense systems installed among those islands to protect our commerce.
    3
  8198.  @pierremarel  "The reason why China is not going to war - yet - is because 1. The USA still have the military predominance on the global stage" There was a time in history during Ming Dynasty, when China had a powerful and technologically advanced navy for its time, unchallenged even by the West. Between 1405 and 1433, The Chinese Admiral Zheng He led seven voyages throughout the Indian Ocean, leading an armada of over 300 ships. Some of these ships were enormous, at 5-8 times the size of Christopher Columbus' Santa Maria flagship. But Zheng He's voyages were for peaceful trading purposes, not military conquest of other nations. Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, porcelain (fine china) were traded in exchange for exotic animals like giraffes to bring back to China. Had Zheng He's voyage been one of conquest, then China would have founded overseas colonies (much like their Western counterparts did centuries later) yet instead we have none. So even during this historical period of immense military might, China was more interested in trade than in conquest. It's quite likely that China will remain peaceful even after U.S no longer has military predominance, given China's history.
    3
  8199.  @pierremarel  Not only do Chinese have a strong reputation of being successful money driven merchants, but Chinese are perhaps among the most intelligent and diligent, with long history and rich vibrant culture. Chinese are no stranger to hard work, often working as farmers, laborers (coolies), rickshaw workers, chefs (of Chinese restaurants) laundromat workers, nail salon workers, massage parlor workers, etc. Chinese families tend to save money for a rainy day, and parents tend to encourage kids to study hard and get good grades, instead of partying away their youth, getting a good job like doctors, lawyers, engineers, bankers, scientists, etc. It almost seems like there's no job too low or too high, that Chinese are willing to take on, or aren't qualified for. But of course, all these are just "stereotypes" about Chinese and aren't necessarily true, yet there's still seems to be a lot of anti-China sentiment against China especially in the West.
    3
  8200.  @pierremarel  You said: "You will agree with me that even the western countries have abandoned the strategy of land acquisitions. Invasions bring bad publicity nowadays." Old style Colonialism has given way to neo-Colonialism. Outright invasion is frowned upon, so the United States goes through more subtle ways through economic, cultural and political imperialism. And while there's no explicit colonization process, many former colonies still suffer from the "colonial mentality" where they worship everything Anglo-Saxon and make policies in the interest of their former colonial masters. "That does not mean that China (or the CCP as long as it sustains its control over China) will refrain from imposing his ways to smaller tributary countries and, if required, by the use of force." The tributary system used by ancient China is different from the Western definition, and is often misunderstood. In the Chinese system, the tributaries are expected to acknowledge China's predominant role, through sending tributes (often of a taxing nature, including food, resources, slaves, etc) to China and in exchange, China sends gifts to tributaries that is equal in value (if not more valuable), such as silk, tea, porcelain, etc. The tributary states are often granted near complete autonomy, as well as trading rights and military assistance by the Imperial Chinese Army, in case of invasion by other countries. Oftentimes, the tributaries stand to gain much from such a system. But the tributary system is no more, and President Xi Jinping has made it clear that China political system is not for export. “We will not import other countries’ models, and will not export the China model,” President Xi Jinping told a forum for foreign political groups. “We will provide more opportunities for the world through our development,” he said. Whereas the United States is still trying to export its own brand of democracy to other countries.
    3
  8201.  @pierremarel  Glad to know that you have an understanding and appreciation of China's history and culture. China has 5000 years of history and is possibly among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. And while you appear to have this revulsion towards authoritarianism, if you look at our history, China has actually always been under the authoritarian rule of emperors and the Imperial Court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. China has historically benefitted from having a strong central government, and the current political system (under President Xi and the Communist Party of China) closely emulates the governing system of China's past. Not an exact clone of course, but the current system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot). If anything, China is living proof that not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful. China should chart out our own path to political success, instead of just blindly copying Western style democracy.
    3
  8202.  Beast Mode  "a warrior in a garden" is one who practices his martial art, but is appreciative of peace. This is representative of China, being a peaceful rising power, with a strong military yes, but currently not involved in any active war. Whereas the United States doesn't behave like "a warrior in the garden" with people like you constantly pushing for nuclear war.
    3
  8203.  @bossku4646  Orange Chicken is actually American Chinese food, just like General Tso's Chicken.
    3
  8204. +Paul Harrison Western culture was built on the backs of African slavery, genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, occupation of their lands, brutal colonization of Asia and African, and plundering of their resources like gold. Much of Western mathematics, sciences and astronomy actually had their roots from India and the Middle East (which you seem to despise) and Chinese inventions like the crossbow and gunpowder, help the Westerners establish dominance over other countries, occupy lands and steal resources. Your science and math aren't entirely your own. Your lands aren't even your own, Your resources like gold (and even slaves) aren't even your own and have been plundered from Asia, Africa, America and Australia, the latter two being occupied territories even till today.
    3
  8205. Australia seems to pride itself with the title: "The U.S Deputy Sheriff in Asia"
    3
  8206.  @EuriEuropa  China's ghost cities are slowly being filled up. For example, in 2011, London’s Daily Mail reported that the Zhengzhou New Area was China’s largest ghost city, but today, the city has a population of 10,120,000 inhabitants, and had a GDP of 1,014 billion(RMB) in 2018. Don't believe me? Check out this beautiful video of Zhengzhou: youtube.com/watch?v=jFdLkgDS-QE&t=8 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for the best experience) Every year, there are millions of people migrating from the rural countryside in China to the urban centers to find jobs, and slowly, our cities are getting filled up. It just takes times that's all.
    3
  8207.  @elanor2123  Did you know that the 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and a traitor to his people? The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government (Beijing). Declassified CIA files have exposed that a total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) ... Source: Wikipedia: CIA Tibetan program So here we have concrete evidence that the 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the USA to engage in separatist activities against the Central People's Government.
    3
  8208. At 14:00 I found it strange why you quoted an article from the American Chamber of Commerce about Americans leaving Tokyo because Covid restrictions, and that only 3% of their jobs can be filled by the local talent in Tokyo, and somehow apply that to China? China is NOT Tokyo, and the comparison is rather inappropraite. From my experience, most expats come to China primarily to teach English, but most of these jobs can be replaced domestically by overseas educated Chinese. Therefore, even in the long term, it appears that there's no real need for China to cater to expats.
    3
  8209. The irony is that Singapore itself has been ruled by an authoritarian single-party PAP for 57 years, much like how China has been ruled by the CPC for 73 years.
    3
  8210.  @zackk4393  But according to Wikipedia: A Madman's Diary, the diary form was inspired by Nikolai Gogol's short story "Diary of a Madman", as was the idea of the madman who sees reality more clearly than those around him. It's a work of fiction, not based on a true story.
    3
  8211.  @zackk4393  Malcolm X spoke admiringly of Mao's global leadership at a rally in Harlem in November 1964. "They used to have a saying that one doesn't have a Chinaman's chance. But they don't say that any more. They used that expression back when China was weak. But now that Mao Zedong has been successful in making China a strong country, the Chinese have more chance than anybody else. So this saying has become outdated. Well just as it took a strong China to give a Chinese person respect wherever that Chinese person is found on this earth, when we get a strong Africa, the person of African origin or African ancestry will be respected anyplace on this earth, even in America. But he will not be respected in America until Africa is strong, just as the Chinaman wasn't respected abroad until China became strong." - Malcom X
    3
  8212. "Lol. they need freedom." Chinese people are free to travel overseas for a vacation or for work or study. Every country in the world has some Chinese tourists in their lands. In your schools and universities, you can find Chinese exchange students and even in you workplace, you are bound to have Chinese national colleagues. So what more freedom do you need?
    3
  8213. +an ly True that the One Child Policy created problems, but it's not the end of the world and Chinese government can always import Vietnamese brides and other solutions. There are also many Chinese women, who otherwise won't have gotten to school and become successful career women, if not for the One Child Policy. Every policy has both good and bad things associated with it.
    3
  8214. +an ly South East Asian countries have human trafficking problems and many other countries also have Vietnamese brides imported into their countries. And who are you to judge the couples age difference? As long as it's legal then why are you judging other people's marriages?
    3
  8215.  @billyehh  So even you agree that rare earth metals production outside of China will be inefficient and costly, so why would they still proceed with it? It is the nature of capitalists to pursue profit, so in this sense, decoupling with China is virtually impossible.
    3
  8216. The U.S government don't really care about their citizens, they want to cut off Russian gas supply, which would cause U.S gas prices to rise even further. The worst thing is that according to surveys, 80% of Americans support an end to U.S imports of Russian energy as a response to the Ukraine crisis, so the Americans are literally being conditioned to just accept inflation in the USA as it is.
    3
  8217.  Frank Zappa  US Delegate Anthony Blinken said that "Xinjiang, Tibet, Hong Kong, Taiwan are the foremost concerns in American minds." But I think Americans care more about their livelihoods, their jobs, their next meal, climate change, racism against blacks, Covid-19, than about what's happening on the other side of the planet.
    3
  8218. China is sometimes said to be even more capitalist than some Western countries.
    3
  8219. The pen is mightier than the sword. Mass media and social media are some of the weapons of modern warfare, and can possibly do more damage than gunfire and missiles ever could.
    3
  8220.  @kongvinter33  It's clearly an irrelevant attack because what has his history even got to do with his analysis on the Ukraine conflict? Nothing. That's why you're resorting to ad hominem fallacy of attacking him personally instead of attacking the points he brought up.
    3
  8221. ​ @MarkYeung1  "NATO is producing more ammunition than Russia and North Korea combined." If that's the case, then why does USA needs 500,000 artillery rounds from South Korea?
    3
  8222.  @MarkYeung1  You asked: "so how much have the mighty Russian army progressed in the last 20 months of the war?" Russia has gained 4 regions (namely Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporiszhzhia) and celebrated the anniversary of their joining the Russian Federation on 30 Sept. Whereas the Ukraine Offensive has actually resulted in Ukraine losing territory to Russia.
    3
  8223.  @wladicus1  You said: "Grain export route because Russians are indiscriminately targeting shipments of grain from Odessa to needy countries." Russia has promised to deliver free grain to 6 African nations, with supply volumes from 25,000 to 50,000 tons.
    3
  8224.  @MarkYeung1  "just like the best thing Japan should have done in 1940 was to withdraw from China." You're making the fallacy of false equivalence and basically comparing apples to oranges. What has Japan in 1940 even got to do with the Ukraine conflict when the situations are completely different?
    3
  8225. Wafer fabrication consumes millions of gallons of water a day. When drought struck Taiwan, the island's chip fabrication industry was severely affected. I don't think its a bright idea for the U.S to transfer Taiwan's TMSC chip technology to arid Arizona of all places.
    3
  8226.  suburben yobbo  Where's your evidence that China's population will collapse in 2060? You really think that your prediction will come through? Over 50 years ago, nobody expected "communist" China to ever succeed or become powerful and a global power. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1990s, everyone fully expected China to soon follow. But China defied all expectations of failure and survived long after the USSR dissolution, transforming from a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past into an economic juggernaut, the world's factory (Made in China) a growing scientific and technological power, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. And its all achieved under the CCP leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success.
    3
  8227.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "If China allows free elections in Hong Kong (as per the Basic Law)," Let's get this straight, Hong Kong Basic Law does not promise free elections in Hong Kong. According to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條) "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." Therefore, mainland China reserves the right to appoint Hong Kong Chief Executive. As per Hong Kong Basic Law.
    3
  8228.  @catmandu6776  China has air pollution problems, especially in Beijing in the past when the number of pollution particles in the air reached harmful at times. The government has recognized the issues and began switching to sources of renewable energy like hydropower and also solar power. China has the most solar installations in the world and ranks top in the world in solar energy production. Top 10 countries with the highest Solar energy production in 2018 1. China (177,500,000 MWh) 2. United States (97,118,000 MWh) 3. Japan (71,688,000 MWh) 4. Germany (46,164,000 MWh) 5. India (30,732,000 MWh) 6. Italy (23,230,000 MWh) 7. United Kingdom (12,921,000 MWh) 8. Spain (12,520,000 MWh) 9. Australia (12,081,000 MWh) 10. France (10,158,000 MWh) ... Source: YouTube: Top Solar Energy Producing Country | Solar Energy Data
    3
  8229.  @A1DollarTaco  Sri Lanka's economic woes were caused by global inflation and the Russo-Ukraine conflict, how is China to blame for Sri Lanka's economic woes?
    3
  8230. Sounds like you're describing gongfu (功夫) which not only refers to martial arts, but it also means skill, ability and effort, especially over a long period of time, to eventually attain a level enough to impress people.
    3
  8231. Shenzhen’s economic growth surpassed Hong Kong's in 2017. Source: Shenzhen surpasses US$338 billion GDP mark in 2017, beats Hong Kong and Singapore’s growth scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2128310/shenzhen-88-cent-hi-tech-growth-roll-hit-y2tr-2017 Shenzhen is roughly the same economic size as Singapore and Hong Kong, but recorded nominal output of 2.2 trillion yuan (US$338 billion) in 2017 thanks to its booming hi-tech sector. Over 40% of the output came from “innovative” businesses such as internet, biotech and telecom.
    3
  8232. Here's India's Chandrayaan-2 Lunar Lander attempt. Video: India's Lunar Lander May Have Crashed Into the Moon youtu.be/WV5gUOpj3HM
    3
  8233. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    3
  8234.  @voiceofreason6515  "神州 Shenzhou That’s exactly what you implied." Could you quote me my words saying that Taiwan's economy stagnated because of lack of freedom? What I said was that Taiwan's economy Taiwan's economy prospered under authoritarian single-party rule of the KMT, and the statistics indicated that.
    3
  8235.  @maicholaa7482  You said: "no one denies Western media is corrupt as hell" But the problem lies many Western audiences still blindly believe Western MSM despite the rampart corruption and fake news. They claimed that because their media is unregulated, therefore, they are automatically telling the truth, but this is false as unregulated media results in a (second) pandemic of fake news. You said: "but that doesn't make Chinese media any less corrupt" The difference is that Chinese media is regulated to weed out the fake news. Additionally there is always skepticism regarding Chinese media, sources and articles (even among Chinese audiences) this makes it "less dangerous" than Western audiences who just blindly believe Western MSM. Because Chinese media has to try harder, stick to truthful sources to persuade audiences, whereas Western MSM can literally get away with lying, and their audiences gobble up their lies without questioning it.
    3
  8236. +InfinityGaming "High population is an asset" But like the video said, who's going to take care of the population boomers when they grow old? It may be true that malnutrition is concentrated on the rural areas, but it doesn't detract from my point that "Why let more kids get born, only to die in malnutrition or not have enough schools to go to?" Like you said, India has limited resources such as food, education and healthcare for these kids, so why spread those limited resources over multiple kids, instead of concentrating them on only the most healthiest kids?
    3
  8237. Before I went to sleep, my wife was complaining to me: "This Russia is such a bad country, if Ukraine wants to join NATO, it is their business and freedom, Russia has no right to intervene. This is just an excuse for Russia to invade Ukraine." I said nothing, got out of bed and went to the kitchen, before returning to bed with knife in my hand. I told my wife: "Let's go to sleep" Upon seeing the knife, my wife sat up abruptly and looked at me with wide eyes. "What are you doing? Sleeping with a knife?!" she exclaimed. I replied: "Don’t worry about it, let’s go to sleep. Besides, me sleeping with a knife is none of your business and it is my freedom." My wife said: "You're crazy! How can I sleep when you are lying next to me with a knife? What if you accidentally cut me?" I replied: “Well, you don’t even trust your own husband, how can you expect Russia to trust Ukraine? Sleeping with a knife is like Ukraine joining the NATO." .... An anonymous analogy taken off Weibo.
    3
  8238.  @zilun  Most Americans actually care nothing about Taiwan, they are more concerned with local American woes, rather than getting into another war with China over Taiwan. Source: Polls show only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/2156237/what-would-us-do-if-beijing-decided-take-taiwan-force
    3
  8239.  @Darkknight-dn4wc  The US clearly recognises Taiwan as part of China under the One China policy. Even US President Trump has agreed to honor the One China policy after receiving phonecall from President Xi Jinping. Source: Trump Tells Xi Jinping U.S. Will Honor ‘One China’ Policy nytimes.com/2017/02/09/world/asia/donald-trump-china-xi-jinping-letter.html
    3
  8240.  @Darkknight-dn4wc  Why should People's Republic of China adopt democracy and free elections to unify China? It was the Republic of China that lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa, so why should China adopt democracy then?
    3
  8241.  The Snurger  The truth is that China is progressing rapidly, that's why USA is afraid of athletes and people visiting China and seeing our progress, that's why they promote boycotting Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics. It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set and many economists firmly believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's economy sometime in the foreseeable future.
    3
  8242.  @MarkYeung1  Throughout it's 5,000 years of history, China always been under the authoritarian rule of a strong central government. Even China's current political system closely emulates the Emperor and Imperial Court system of ancient China. That's why China's current system is called Socialism with Chinese Characteristics to reflect this continuation. What's clear though is that throughout it's long history, China never had a Western style democracy. Even during the Republic of China (1912-1949) period, the KMT in the mainland only held a total of 2 elections for the whole 37 years period.
    3
  8243.  @MarkYeung1  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single party KMT rule for more than half it's life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, and Chiang Kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissenters and political rivals, during the White Terror period of Taiwan. The KMT imposed martial law on Taiwan for 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world".Yet Taiwan flourished under KMT rule, but when democracy was introduced in the 1990s, Taiwan's economic growth became more modest.
    3
  8244.  @kcg7861  About poverty in China, according to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-China propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. As for stealing technology, Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions?
    3
  8245.  @judykraska400  The problem is that growing anti-China sentiment also results in anti-Asian hate crimes being committed against other people of Asian descent, including non-Chinese Asians like Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese etc. Such anti-Asian resentment makes USA a less attractive destination for Asian students.
    3
  8246. +Yetizrach China was under the KMT (Nationalists) administration from 1912-1949 (37 years) but how was China much more developed during that time? +Edward Lavaden By the time WW2 ended in 1945, the communists had about 1,200,000 troops (June 1945) whereas the KMT had 4,300,000 troops (June 1946) so the KMT still outnumber the communists 3 to 1. The Soviets only provided minimal support to the communists during the war, whereas KMT had the support in the form of USA military aid. But KMT was heavily corrupt and US President Harry Truman made a remark that "the Chiangs, the Kungs, and the Soongs (were) all thieves" having pocketed $750 million dollars of US aid.
    3
  8247. It's a myth for sure. Chilean diplomat (Carlos Gallo and his wife) provided eyewitness accounts to the events unfolding inside Tiananmen Square, and he did not observe any mass firing of guns inside the Square and that the troops entering the Square were armed with truncheons and wooden shields (anti-riot gear).
    3
  8248.  @djunasidharta3812  But strangely, none of those God-fearing people seem to believe that Covid-19 was another plague sent by their God to punish mankind, they seem to think that gathering in churches will somehow protect themselves from the coronavirus.
    3
  8249.  @djunasidharta3812  Such behavior is almost akin to those cults that made members drink Kool-Aid and perish by the hundreds. Because it's what they've been indoctrinated to believe in and to be faithful towards.
    3
  8250.  @thethoth1755  You said: "The overwhelming evidence that China has covered up all the evidence ,refused to cooperate with the world health organization’s investigation and now threatening anyone who points a finger , is clearly the guilty party." How did China covered up all the evidence? China was the first to inform the World Health Organization of a "mysterious pneumonia-like illness" on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020, China had isolated and identified the novel coronavirus strain (out of millions) in record time. By 12th Jan 2020, China had sequenced the coronavirus genome and shared the vital information with the WHO. So perhaps could you explain how did China cover up all the evidence? Because China's behavior appears to be the complete opposite of what you described. Next you said China refused to cooperate with the WHO's investigation, but a WHO investigation team touched down in Wuhan on Jan 2020 to investigate Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market, and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Their investigations revealed that the coronavirus did not originate in the seafood market, it was imported in from elsewhere, and the team has all but dismissed the possibility of a lab-leak theory as "highly improbable". So how did China refuse to cooperate with the WHO investigation? In fact, China is the only country who have undergone WHO investigation regarding the coronavirus origins, no other country has done so. Lastly, you said China is now threatening anyone who points a finger, but since the WHO investigation team's results in Wuhan were inconclusive, then why not other countries open their labs to investigations that's all? China is suggesting that the WHO pursue other leads that's all, how does that automatically make China the guilty party?
    3
  8251.  @riccardopagnini2970  That's why I had the word "allies" in inverted commas.
    3
  8252.  @LesegoMakgorogo  China invented the paper banknote and the rest of the world eventually adopted paper currency. Now that China is rolling out digital currency, it's inevitable that other countries will follow.
    3
  8253.  @laserraiset3300  It's not as though Chinese had never invented anything. Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) that made an impact in their respective fields. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge much easier. The Compass made navigation in bad weather conditions much easier. And Gunpowder has revolutionized warfare. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions? T
    3
  8254.  @laserraiset3300  Printing appeared in China before 220 AD. Besides inventing gunpowder, Chinese invented firearms and the world's oldest confirmed surviving firearm is the Heilongjiang handcannon dating back to 1288. Chinese invented grenades during the Song Dynasty (960–1279 AD), when Chinese soldiers packed gunpowder into ceramic or metal containers fitted with fuses.
    3
  8255.  @laserraiset3300  "Many of them have assembly lines in china what creats millions of jobs, so not china is largest producer of vehicles" So those cars have the Made-in-China label on them, and China is indisputably the world's largest producer of vehicles. Because those vehicles certainly aren't Made-in-America.
    3
  8256.  @laserraiset3300  China's millennium old inventions are still in use today, yet you still look down on Chinese inventions? Besides inventing paper, Chinese also invented the paper banknote, making business transactions much easier without the need for metal coinage and precious stones. Chinese even invented fireworks that Americans use for their Fourth of July celebrations. China's inventions are still in use for 1000s of years, compared to the 10s of years that those inventions you mentioned, so isn't this a testament of Chinese invention?
    3
  8257.  @laserraiset3300  Chairman Mao Zedong did not cause those famines, those people starved to death because of bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvest and starvation. Even Mao himself couldn't possibly control the weather, isn't that right?
    3
  8258.  @item6931  If that's that case, then why is it that the U.S denounces countries that refuse to condemn Russia's special military operation? The U.S will accept no other voice towards Russia except the one that suits their own interests.
    3
  8259.  @laserraiset3300  "神州 Shenzhou dude, i'm talking about modern era and modern technologies..." Modern era is only 50-100 years at the most, whereas Chinese inventions like Paper have been around for 500-1000 years and have withstood the long test of time to remain very much in use today.
    3
  8260.  @laserraiset3300  Chairman Mao is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Kuomintang administration failed to achieve during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. When KMT overthrew Qing Dynasty China and established the RoC, China was divided into several regions. Tibet broke free of China, and various warlords ruled different parts of China. It was thanks to Mao Zedong and the Communists, who finally reunified China and proclaimed the PRC's founding in 1949 and Tibet was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951. If not for Mao and the communists, China today would most likely still be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong and unified country we are today.
    3
  8261.  @francisarinze6928  "Don't waste your time arguing with ignorant people when you spot one. Just make your point and move on." There are many people in the west that previously held negative opinions of China, until they actually visited China and seen what life is like here for themselves, to realized that they were lied to about China. I hope that by presenting facts, I could get some of these people to realize how anti-China they are.
    3
  8262. Their videos tend to attract the jokers, while the serious posts get ridiculed a lot.
    3
  8263. Michael S. I hate to sound like one of them, but yes, initially I did enjoy their videos, and their earlier videos showcased both the good and bad parts of China in a balanced format. Over the years however, something changed, and all their recent videos only showcase the negatives. Its like, they give off the impression that they don't regard China as their homeland, nor Chinese people as their fellow countrymen. They keep on referring to China like its some strange foreign land, filled with people of a different culture from them, despite living in China for a long time and even taking Chinese wives (and having kids too).
    3
  8264. Michael S. Nice to know that you have some experience being a foreigner in a country and have assimilated well into American culture. I think that's the key difference between them and you. People like laowhy and serpentza haven't yet assimilated to China's culture. They fiercely retain their independence instead of adopting their host countries practices. They seek to change China to be like what they envision, instead of changing themselves to fit with China. Even their command of Mandarin Chinese is atrocious; they've been in China for what? 10 years? 15 years? But they only retain only the most rudimentary understanding of Chinese culture and language. Their spoken Mandarin is comparable to a 7-year olds, and you can't hold a proper, decent conversation with them in Mandarin on various topics. I don't want to sound overly critical, but they keep on saying their Chinese is good when it really isn't. I understand that is can be frustrating for foreigners to live in China (the same for foreigners living in any country) But China is China, just like America is America. If you are living in another country, then you should strive to adapt to your host country, instead of imposing your own culture and trying to change the host country to suit your needs.
    3
  8265. Michael S. People who are foreigners will tend to remain foreigners when they themselves refuse to assimilate into their host country. For example, as a foreigner yourself in America, perhaps do Americans perceive you as one of their own? Do you call Americans your own countrymen, perhaps just like you regard America as your home? Its different just surviving day-to-day in a country, and to actually live in a country. These guys aren't perfect yes, and my own views differ greatly from theirs indeed. Its because while growing up in China in 1980s, my family was poor, despite both my parents being working engineers. In the 90s, our family shifted into an apartment. By early 2000s, we could afford our first computer, and then by 2010s every one of our family had a smartphone of our own. It just goes to show that where you grew up greatly influences your viewpoint, just like you have sharing some of your own personal experience growing up in America as well here. But to these guys, it appears China is just a country for them to voice their complains, instead of calling it their homeland. I agree that a better future only happens if we work together on what can be improved. Its true that China has pollution, corruption, energy needs, etc, but a strong firm government is needed to implement change. For example, China built the world's largest hydroelectric power station, Three Gorges Dam to help supply China with renewable green energy to power our growth. China is still heavily coal-dependent, but is taking steps to ban fossil fuel powerplants and switch to green energy. And corruption is rampant in our government, but President Xi is at least conducting corruption crackdown campaign and doing something about it.
    3
  8266. Michael S. I personally believe, that if you want to fit into a new culture, you should start by seeing yourself as one of the local people. Like supposedly if I want to fit in America, I would think of what Americans want, what are American people's dreams and aspirations, what are their fears and so on. Once you start seeing yourself as a local, then the locals should start seeing you as them. But if you continually see yourself as a foreigner, then locals will also see you as a foreigner. Agreed that family finances affect your viewpoint and overall outlook. People born without having to worry about food, or safety and security (like in America for example) will have different view, from someone who grew up worrying about the next meal. China is still not as well off as America, so people coming to China will find that things are not to their standards. About positivity, its a good idea to balance both positivity and negativity in videos, so its kinda sad that people like laowhy and serpentza choose to post more negative videos than positive ones (especially the latest ones). I don't mind watching negative videos about China (China is not perfect after all) but if those guys continually post negative video after negative video, then it starts to get a little suspicious after a while. There are actually many good things about China, but these people seem to concentrate only the negatives. Food poisoning, pollution, censorship, corruption, I'm sure many people heard these before, but they keep on rehashing the same stuff in each episode. So many Chinese people eat the food here in China, and many people don't suffer poisoning. Maybe some people will get food poisoning because of poor body or something, but otherwise millions of Chinese survive (and enjoy) eating our food.
    3
  8267. China minds its own domestic affairs instead of other countries internal affairs. The U.S ignores domestic affairs, instead it focuses on China's internal affairs.
    3
  8268.  @heyyeyaaeyaaaeyaeyaa3292  It is estimated that around 4,000 people have left their homes in the West to migrate to ISIS. Many have become jihadist fighters in the apparent hope of achieving martyrdom. Source: theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/07/isis-foreign-fighters-political-pilgrims/399209/ At least China is helping prevent the Uighur children from growing up to become terrorists, but what is the West doing to stop terrorism?
    3
  8269.  @umaersharief  My Pakistan brother, you yourself are disbeliever of Islam, and if you look at the real traditional Uighur Culture, they actually don't wear ugly black Muslim headveils. Islamic invaders have Islamised many regions, and this picture shows the stark contrast between traditional clothing and Islamic clothing. This is not our traditional dress images-cdn.9gag.com/photo/axjzx4D_700b.jpg
    3
  8270.  @annomaly751  Look at the West, and they just bend over backward to accommodate Muslim immigrants. Muslim refugees are fleeing their conflict ridden Islamic countries and flooding the Western countries like United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, etc, and the Muslims are under little pressure to adapt to their predominantly Christian host countries, much to the chagrin of Westerners. For example, instead of adopting their host country's cultures, Muslims immigrants continue their traditional culture like Muslim men marrying multiple wives, or Muslim women wearing Muslim headveil out in public, and secretly, many Westerners are (understandably) angry that Muslims are not assimilating, but can't voice their honest opinions for fear of being labelled "racist" (even though Islam is not a race) or "Islamophobe." The Muslims take Westener's silence as acceptance of their ways.
    3
  8271.  @MrBlaxjax  China is imparting positive Chinese virtues, like being studious and industrious, to Uighurs in Xinjiang (who are Chinese citizens by birth) and helping them graduate with proper education so that they can find a job and contribute positively to society, instead of being radicalized at a young age, migrating to the Middle East to join terrorists groups, and then sacrificing their lives (and their bright future) for the terrorist's causes.
    3
  8272. @Madhur Gupta Xinjiang was first referred to as "Xiyu" (Chinese: 西域) under the Han dynasty, which drove the Xiongnu out of the Tarim Basin in 60 BCE (Han–Xiongnu War) in an effort to build and secure the profitable Silk Road. Only later did the Islamic invaders conquered the region and converted the natives to Islam.
    3
  8273.  @LizardKing360  Why be embarrassed to call yourself Chinese? I'm Chinese and I am proud of my country despite the numerous hardship it has endured over millennia. While other empires have since collapsed and Chinese civilization still lives on. Even Chinese characters have been in use since 1200 BCE, and constitute the oldest continuously used system of writing in the world, when even other ancient scripts like Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia) Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs have since become dead languages, since they are no longer evolving and no new words are being added to their vocabulary.
    3
  8274. Trump and Pompeo: "China is dystopian surveillance state, technology is used to oppress the citizens. And they stole our American technology!"
    3
  8275.  @MarkYeung1  Look at the testimony by whistleblower that Facebook prioritise profits above safety, and harming children's well being in the process. The Facebook algorithm distorts children's perceptions and dividing society. The purpose of Facebook's algorithm is "how to keep users online" rather than offline, in order to maximise profits and this is the damaging aspect of capitalism at work.
    3
  8276. Chinese people don't want war, but that does not mean our military is weak. We will defend our sovereignty, our homes and our loved ones if USA decides to invade our country from across the Pacific Ocean, like what USA is doing to the Middle East currently.
    3
  8277.  @drpatton1160  "I forgot they don't have YouTube, it's banned" Since when is YouTube banned in China? Nobody come to arrest you for logging on to YT while in China.
    3
  8278.  JustEnd  If it's banned, then accessing YouTube in China would get you arrested, but so far, nobody in China has been arrested for accessing YT while in China. Why don't you look up the meaning of the word "banned"?
    3
  8279.  @weixu2057  So both of us agree that vaccines alone are not enough, there needs to be steps taken to reduce the virus transmission, thus reducing the chance of mutation and newer, deadlier, more transmissible variants emerging. China is using lockdowns to curb the spread of coronavirus and reduce the likelihood of newer strains emerging.
    3
  8280.  @weixu2057  But what are some examples of other different measures? Earlier you mentioned vaccinations and medications, but since even vaccinated people like Cyrus Janssen still caught the Omicron variant, it shows that vaccines alone aren't effective, there needs to be steps taken to reduce the virus transmission and thus, reducing the chance of mutation and newer, deadlier, more transmissible variants emerging. China is at the forefront of tackling Covid-19 by reducing transmissions as much as possible.
    3
  8281.  @weixu2057  How am I objecting to your views? I'm willing to hear you out on your "different measures", but thus far you did not actually name any different measures, you just claim high rate of vaccination and proper medical interventions (could you list some examples of medical interventions?) that's all. However both of us agree that vaccines alone are not enough, since even Cyrus got vaccinated but still caught the Omicron variant. So additional steps need to be taken to curb the spread of Covid-19 in order to reduce the likelihood of newer, deadlier variants emerging. Because the more the virus transmits from person to person, the more the chance of mutation occurring and new strains arising.
    3
  8282.  @ryanshiflett2178  You said: "We came up with a vaccine for a new virus in less than a year." And that vaccine has been rendered ineffective in curbing the spread, by the emergence of new strains of the coronavirus, specifically the Omicron variant. You said: "Additionally, since more people are vaccinated and/or infected, this means herd immunity is closer than ever before." But once a new variant emerges, then herd immunity will be rendered moot, since people who gotten vaccinated can still get infected and people who recovered from Covid-19 can still get reinfected. You said: "People who have been infected can get infected again, but their body will recognise the parts of the COVID virus and therefore will respond quicker to the virus, which decreases the health risk to the person." Where is the science behind this? There are cases where a recovered person gets reinfected with Covid-19 and the second time is more severe than the first.
    3
  8283.  @krokitongsstudio3474  China publishes more scientific research papers than any other country in the world. For the first time, China has overtaken the United States in terms of the total number of science publications, according to statistics compiled by the US National Science Foundation (NSF). Source: China declared world’s largest producer of scientific articles nature.com/articles/d41586-018-00927-4 The agency’s report, released on 18 January, documents the United States’ increasing competition from China and other developing countries that are stepping up their investments in science and technology.
    3
  8284.  @jklok  Despite China's impressive weapons arsenal, China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    3
  8285.  @jklok  The Uighurs in our reeducation schools are given the weekend off and they can come out of school to return home to be with their loved ones. The schools charter buses to help take the Uighurs back to their home villages (which can be quite remote, given the size of Xinjiang).
    3
  8286.  @roscojenkins7451  And how's the population of Gaza doing at this moment, compared to the Uighurs in Xinjiang? Why do you feel the need to compare Israel with China?
    3
  8287. @sg23148 Have you actually been to Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region and seen what life is like there for yourself?
    3
  8288.  @Joe-ul3gh  I suggest you read the article: The Return of Industrial Warfare
    3
  8289.  @user-zu5do6ri6r  If you want to talk about jail, it's actually the United States that has the largest prison population in the world.
    3
  8290.  @iloveporkandchicken4718  What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. So what makes you think Chinese people lack free will then? You think Muslim countries don't murder people? Didn't President Trump stood with Saudi Arabia Crown Prince in the murder of reporter, Khashoggi and calling him enemy of the state? Source: Trump ‘stands with’ Saudi Arabia and defends crown prince over Khashoggi theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/20/trump-saudi-arabia-jamal-khashoggi-crown-prince
    3
  8291.  @ryanmeinecke8260  Hong Kong Extradition Bill was proposed because of a certain incident. Some Hong Konger (named Chan) flew to Taiwan with his pregnant girlfriend and strangled her to death, then flew back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body in Taiwan. Chan has since confessed and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice in Taiwan, but Hong Kong realised it has no existing extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family in Hong Kong. Therefore, Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam propose the amendments to HK extradition bill in order to cover up this legal loophole.
    3
  8292.  @ryanmeinecke8260  Your government is too weak and it is allowing Muslims free reign in your country. Look at how some Americans react to the proposed building of a new mosque in Spotsylvania County, Virginia. Video: Anti-Muslim ranters ganged up on a Muslim man at a town hall meeting www.youtube.com/watch?v=INy4gaUrCL4 You can hear the raw emotion in that American's voice, how he disregarded the stupid "politically correctness" culture prohibiting anyone from mentioning anything bad about Islam. China is helping the Uighurs in China assimilate into Chinese culture, language and to develop a sense of nationalism among our kids and future generations of Chinese, so that this sort of blatant rejection won't rear its ugly head in China.
    3
  8293.  @bugsygoo  "神州 Shenzhou I think it became politicized when the vice premier sexually assaulted her." Oh? Where's your evidence that the vice premier sexually assaulted Peng Shuai? From what I understand, Peng Shuai wrote an email to WTA that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and she also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    3
  8294.  @barisard7190  "神州 Shenzhou there's a very simple solution to this problem. STOP RAPING YOUR ATHLETES!!" Could you furnish us with actual evidence of rape of our athletes? Larry Nassar, the former USA Gymnastics and Olympic Team physician sexually abused some 499 gymnasts and yet complaints to the FBI went unanswered and Nassar continued his crimes for a long time.
    3
  8295.  @pawelstuglik4737  "They don't have nuclear warheads and their being nuclear-powered does not bring Australia an inch closer to being a nuclear-armed country." It does. Acquiring nuclear-powered submarines is one step in embarking on the road to nuclear-armed country. For what reason does a country acquire nuclear-powered subs then? If Australia found a way to refine the nuclear material in submarines into weapons-grade nuclear materials, then surely that makes Australia a possible target for nuclear strike. Just don't buy nuclear-powered submarines if you don't want to become targeted by potential nuclear strike. Australia brought this upon themselves when they decide to purchase nuclear submarine technology from the U.S.
    3
  8296.  @johnnyzhao7698  Yes. Many of the Western anti-China MSM are just out there to malign China that's all, when it's apparent that Peng Shuai is safe and just keeping a low profile. The Western MSM and WTA blow this issue out of proportion and many of their audience blindly believe it without question.
    3
  8297.  @bugsygoo  "神州 Shenzhou Start off by blaming the victim. Nice." How am I blaming the victim? I'm asking for your evidence that the vice premier sexually assaulted Peng Shuai, because Peng Shuai wrote in an email that the allegations of sexual assault aren't true. Then where's the allegations of sexual assault? If you can't even establish a basis for the claim of sexual assault, then how do we even proceed from here? "If the CCP has nothing to hide, why are they blocking all mention of her on the Chinese internet?" Who says that she's blocked on Chinese Internet? I can find pages of Peng Shuai 彭帅 on Baidu, go ahead and search on Baidu for Peng Shuai and why do you claim all mention of her is blocked on the Chinese internet? "If they can make Jack MA disappear for a few months and then come back all contrite, imagine what they can do to a woman with no power?" Jack Ma was also similarly keeping a low profile and had avoiding the public eye, yet anti-China trolls continued to demand "Where's Jack Ma?" and it turns out Jack Ma was a on a holiday cruise in the Balearic waters. So why is it inconceivable to you that Peng Shuai want's to keep a low profile after her previous relation with a much older man has been revealed? "And what's the motive of the WTA? They stand to lose hundreds of millions." It's possible that WTA want's to politicize the issue in order to malign China. The 2022 Beijing Olympics are coming soon, and WTA is trying to blow the matter up in order to use as "ammunition" to get more countries to potentially boycott the Beijing games.
    3
  8298. US President Trump just unilaterally slap sanctions on steel and aluminum, without even going through the proper World Trade Organization channels. US has exempted some countries from the tariffs but many US allies like Australia, India, Canada, etc are not on this list and some are lodging a complaint to the WTO against the USA just slapping tariffs like that.
    3
  8299. +Alex Lee That is a bilateral dispute between China and South Korea and any complaints to WTO could not be categorized as a legal action but was rather a request for the WTO to look into whether China was upholding trade agreements fairly or not. Besides, USA and EU receive far more WTO complaints than China here according to WTO website: China:18 as complainant, 40 as respondent. European Union: 97 as complainant, 94 as respondent. United States of America: 125, as complainant, 171 as respondent. Source: WTO Dispute settlement map wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_maps_e.htm So who is the real villian here? China receive and responded to far less complaints in WTO, as compared to EU and USA who have almost 100 cases (and over 100 cases for USA)
    3
  8300. +Alex Lee China wanted to be included as a founding member of WTO (which would validate our country as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because United States, European countries, and Japan imposed additional conditions onto China, and when China joined the WTO, it agreed to considerably harsher conditions than other developing countries, Why is it those countries even get to bully China's membership into WTO and prevent China from joining the WTO when it was first founded? How is this considered propaganda when it was those country refused China's initial entry, and made China agree to considerably harsher conditions to enter WTO?
    3
  8301. Neither can anyone ask about Biden's son.
    3
  8302. ​ @cchannel7857  你在说美国对吗？美国新冠死亡人数超80万，实际数字恐更高，但美国政府还继续煽动民族主义。唤醒中国民族主义的不是中国政府，而是美国政客。
    3
  8303.  @cchannel7857  知己知彼，百战不殆。两个大国在博弈与竞争。如果你对另一国完全无知，那如何与他们博弈与竞争呢？
    3
  8304. China bought 50.93 million tonnes of soybeans from Brazil in 2017, compared to 32.9 million tonnes from United States. Remember that the newscaster said, China is USA's biggest buyer, but not that USA is China's biggest supplier.
    3
  8305.  @Womberto  You're referring to serpentza's latest video? serpentza and c-milk have been caught lying several times, i.e they talked about Dune Movie Poster not featuring black actress Sharon Ducan-Brewster in China, but it turns out it was a lie.
    3
  8306.  @Womberto  Cyrus Janssen had clearly published his video entitled: "Americans Don't Understand The Truth About China" before, and it's CGTN that is asking Cyrus for permission to publish HIS video on their CGTN website, then it's apparent that he said those things before being approached by CGTN later. You're just trying to twist the timeline of events to make it sound like he's being paid to say those things.
    3
  8307.  @zackk7175  serpentza has a history of lying, like when he and c-milk lied about Dune movie poster in China omitting black actress Sharon Duncan Brewster. But people in China have posted images of Dune movie poster and they featured the black actress, so what makes you think serpentza would be telling the truth this time about Cyrus?
    3
  8308. Perhaps it makes sense in context, only because the West has clearly wronged China in the past, that they ask themselves such a question. Not just China, but the West has also done much wrong to many other countries, such that they now fear retribution for their actions. That's why they are asking such a cynical question as "Can China be trusted?"
    3
  8309. The Umbrella Protests were by naive Hong Kong university undergrads, who've been cloistered inside a world of education, of textbook ideals and perfect theories regarding democracy. These protestors haven't even step out into the real working world of adults, get a job, get an apartment, settle down and raise kids, yet these idealistic students already think they know how to govern Hong Kong?
    3
  8310.  @opakular  The population of Uighurs in China has actually grown over the years, from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. What Chinese genocide are you talking about when the population of Uighurs has increased in size?
    3
  8311.  @CJ-Fortes_Atque_Fidelis  "Only a Muslim who have never read the Quran or Ahadith will say what you are saying." Could you quote the passage or line in the Quran or the Ahadith specifically calling for the genocide of Jews?
    3
  8312.  @CJ-Fortes_Atque_Fidelis  You said: "The majority of Palestinians support Hamas genocide on Jews," Does the majority of Israelites support the IDF genocide on Palestinians living in Gaza? If so then shouldn't it them that require re-education?
    3
  8313.  @CJ-Fortes_Atque_Fidelis  It's not a dumb question. You claim that there are Palestinians that support Hamas, but at the same time, there are also Israelites that support the IDF's genocide of Palestinians in Gaza. And not just Gaza, even the West Bank (of which there is no Hamas presence) is being targeted by IDF.
    3
  8314.  @CJ-Fortes_Atque_Fidelis  Firstly, I never said you said that. But the matter of fact is that such people do exist. Secondly, since according to you: "collateral damage is not genocide" that by that same token, Hamas being at war with the IDF means that civilians killed on Oct 7 could also be classified as collateral damage. After all, their main goal was to take hostages (in order to exchange them for the release of Palestinian prisoners). Thirdly, there's new footage which suggests the "civilian" casualties on Oct 7 could have been caused by crossfire from the IDF. What we need is a truly independent investigation into the events that occurred on Oct 7.
    3
  8315.  @TPELaoY  China's economy expanded 4.6% year-on-year in the 3rd quarter of 2024, compared with market forecasts of 4.5%, how's that a faltering economy?
    3
  8316.  vlADOLF PUTLER  "神州 Shenzhou No one in the civilized world wants anything to do with a fascist dictatorship." You're talking about the U.S right? Yeah, no one wants to be involved with a warmongering state like the U.S but they continue to exert their influence over the world.
    3
  8317.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "Firstly, the Qing government was Manchu not Chinese. You dont see a French calling himself a Roman or claiming Roman territory do you. What a joke." After conquering China proper, the Manchus identified their state as "China", equivalently as Zhōngguó (中國; 'middle kingdom') in Chinese. The emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including, among other areas, present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, and Tibet) as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that only Han areas were properly part of "China". The government used "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their state in official documents, including the Chinese-language versions of treaties and maps of the world. So how was the Qing government not Chinese?
    3
  8318.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "1: The island now known as Taiwan was inhabited and ruled by the aborigines for approximately 30,000 years." But today the island now known as Taiwan is inhabited by Chinese. Similar to how Australian aborigines and Native Americans once ruled Australia and America, but today they no longer rule themselves. You said: "2: When the Dutch arrived in 1626 most of the population of Formosa were the Yuanzhumin or Gaoshan people (who have no DNA link back to China)" According to Huang et. al (2022), Austronesian speakers in Taiwan, such as Ami and Atayal, derive their ancestries from a Late Neolithic Fujianese source (66.9–74.3%). Liu et. al (2023) stated that the ancestors of Taiwanese Austronesians originated from the southeastern coasts of Neolithic China. So Taiwanese Austronesians do have a DNA link back to China.
    3
  8319.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "3: The Qing had minimal control of Taiwan" Still, it doesn't change the fact that Taiwan was historically part of China. Singapore wasn't historically part of China, so China has no claim to it, whereas Taiwan was historically part of China. Also, you said that the Republic of China had full control over Taiwan, and the ROC called itself China. You said: "4: Due to the lack of control, the Qing did not declare Formosa a Province of the Qing until 1895 as the Japanese was encroaching on the island. The island was handed to Japan soon after. " So at least, the Qing declared the island as a province of China in 1895 at least. Also, after the 1945 Japanese WWII surrender, the Japanese relinquished control over all their previously occupied territory, including Taiwan island. You said: "6: Historically the CCP recognized Formosan independence... Mao’s internationalist position suggested..." That's more of a suggestion, not a formal recognition. Furthermore, the KMT lost the mainland to the CPC (not CCP as you claimed) and fled to Taiwan island, making it the last remaining region of China that poses as an obstacle to complete reunification.
    3
  8320.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  "11: The One China Policy, Un Resolution 2758 or the Treaty of San Francisco do not declare that Taiwan is a province of China. There are no internationally recognized treaties, policies or UN resolutions that state that Taiwan is part of China." -The One China policy refers to a United States policy. In a 1972 joint communiqué with the PRC, the United States "acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China" and "*does not challenge* that position." -On 21 September 2007, the UN General Assembly rejected Taiwan's membership bid to "join the UN under the name of Taiwan", citing Resolution 2758 as acknowledging that Taiwan is part of China. So clearly, the One China principle and UN Resolution 2758 both declare that Taiwan is part of China.
    3
  8321. Shanghai has become the a global financial center and transport hub, with the world's busiest container port. And many other mainland cities like Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Beijing, Chongqing, etc, are rapidly rising as well.
    3
  8322. The banning on naming real world assets based on internet memes, kinda reminds me of the cryptocurrency Dogecoin.
    3
  8323.  Every Word Is A Made-Up Word  The bat soup coronavirus origins myth have long been debunked by experts. Source: Is bat soup a delicacy in China? We debunk a rumour on the origin of the coronavirus observers.france24.com/en/20200203-china-coronavirus-bat-soup-debunk-videos-viral-palau-indonesia
    3
  8324.  Every Word Is A Made-Up Word  In France they have foie gras which is goose/duck liver in which the fowl has been forcefed painfully until it's liver swells to several times its normal size. But that's just how French foie gras is prepared, isn't it?
    3
  8325.  @jackcoolidge8123  "This was shown using thermal imaging on satellites and means that the real death toll is more likely 40,000." How can satellite thermal imaging determine the number of deaths in China to be 40,000? Where do you get your sources from?
    3
  8326.  @thuphat1123  Here's another source debunking the bat soup coronavirus origins. Source: Bat soup in China? This video of a bat in broth was filmed in the Pacific observers.france24.com/en/20200204-china-debunked-coronavirus-wuhan-bat-broth-pacific-bat-soup Videos showing Asian people eating bat soup are circulating widely on social networks, with captions suggesting that eating bats is a possible source of the Chinese coronavirus outbreak. Most of the videos were filmed thousands of kilometers from China, and have no documented link to the outbreak of the virus.
    3
  8327.  @jackcoolidge8123  Source: Social media claims that 'satellite' images showed scale of China's coronavirus cremations are debunked as experts reveal the images were predictions based on weather dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7986553/Sulphur-dioxide-images-NOT-mass-cremations-Wuhan.html
    3
  8328.  t1tacal  USA covered up H1N1 and didn't impose lockdown so that's why H1N1 spread out to infect the rest of the world, yet nobody makes USA pay. So why should China pay? China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China bought the West time to deal with virus but the West squandered it straitstimes.com/opinion/china-bought-the-west-time-the-west-squandered-it
    3
  8329.  t1tacal  USA didn't impose lockdown on H1N1 and that's why it spread to the rest of the world, yet nobody is demanding payment from USA so why should China pay? You're just anti-China that's all.
    3
  8330. This Ren Zhiqiang is a real troublemaker in China. In 2010, he was paid the highest salary of anyone in the 258 listed companies that had filed annual reports. His salary was reportedly 7.07 million yuan ($1.04 million). On 7 May 2010 a protester threw a shoe at him. In November 2013 he threatened to sue the state broadcasting company China Central Television (CCTV) after it reported that Huayuan Real Estate owed 54.9 billion yuan in unpaid tax, and in January 2014 he referred to CCTV as "the dumbest pig on earth".
    3
  8331.  @Notorious_biggest  Ren Zhiqiang, the former Chinese property tycoon and outspoken critic of the government’s handling of the coronavirus outbreak, is under investigation for alleged “serious violations of law and discipline”, the Communist Party’s disciplinary watchdog announced. Source: Chinese coronavirus critic Ren Zhiqiang under investigation, Communist Party disciplinary committee says scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3078858/chinese-critic-ren-zhiqiang-under-investigation-communist-party
    3
  8332. It's the story of the Tortoise and the Hare. NATO (Hare) is slapping every sanction they have at Russia and throwing everything into Ukraine, exhausting themselves before even reaching the finish line. Whereas Russia (Tortoise) has weathered the flurry of sanctions, yet still making slow but steady, incremental progress towards the finish line.
    3
  8333.  @violatedmonkey  Because while there's nothing wrong with the Winnie the Pooh character (and contrary to popular opinion, Winnie the Pooh isn't banned in China, people can purchase Winnie the Pooh right off Taobao and have it shipped to China), but when people compare an Asian man to a Yellow-skintone bear with small eyes, it's turning it into a racist caricature.
    3
  8334.  @violatedmonkey  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it's the United States that's the threat to global peace and stability here.
    3
  8335. Twitter banned users from calling transgender people by their gender at birth.
    3
  8336.  @中華傲訣  There's no benefit to Singapore slapping sanctions on Russia, all it does is earn Singapore a place on Russia's list of unfriendly countries. None of Singapore's neighbors (i.e Malaysia, Indonesia, Phillippines, etc) imposed sanctions on Russia.
    3
  8337. +Snoofy Air South Korea is advanced enough to be able to defend itself significantly, instead of freeloading off US military defense. President Trump has been trying to reduce US military expenditure in NATO, so why not start with S. Korea as well? For example, USA could first withdraw maybe 10-20% of troops in S. Korea. then tempt N. Korea to agreed to complete disarmament, in exchange for full troop withdraw from S. Korea. Even if N. Korea refuses, then USA would have successfully reduced military expenditure in SK by 10-20% and S. Korea government will be alarmed, and invest more money into its supplementing its own defense.
    3
  8338. I've read Peng Shuai's post (you can find the translated version on Reddit) and while she previously had a tumultuous on-and-off affair with a much older man, spanning several years, there is no allegation of sexual assault in her post (point it out to me if you can), so what she says here checks out with her post that there are no allegations.
    3
  8339.  @yslee1401  Of course! Putting Meng under house arrest protects her from the CPC's clutches! It all makes perfect sense now! Canada were playing the hero and saving Meng, who'd thought up such a wacky conspiracy theory?
    3
  8340.  @blitz12399  "So you’re saying a simple request passes as a “discussion”?" The fact that according to you, Zelenskyy made many requests which have been denied numerous times, goes to show that there was a discussion going on. So what I wrote is clearly not a lie like you claimed.
    3
  8341.  @blitz12399  "point is selling arms to Ukraine (majority soviet weapons) is different then supplying western weapons to Ukraine." Soviet weapons are still weapons. The fact remains that Nato has been sending weapons to Ukraine, so my point still stands. Why are you suddenly bringing up western weapons when that is not the point of the topic?
    3
  8342.  @blitz12399  Again, Ukraine was arming itself sold to them from the west. Even you said (and I quote): "the US may have sold Ukraine mostly Soviet era weapons" and the U.S is clearly a member of Nato.
    3
  8343.  @blitz12399  "Your dead wrong if you think the relationship was about sending Nukes to Ukraine just because Zelenskyy asked." Let's see. Zelenskyy asked for Leopard tanks and was initially denied until he actually got them. Zelenskyy asked for long-range missiles and was initially denied and he got them too. Start to see a pattern here? Who knows, perhaps Zelenskyy could have gotten nukes had he pressed hard enough.
    3
  8344.  @blitz12399  "selling Soviet weapons is different than arming Ukraine." What do you think Ukraine going to do with those Soviet weapons? Put them in a museum? It's astonishing the level of mental gymnastics you go through. "much like Nicaragua buying weapons from Russian. Do you think it’s accurate to say Russia is arming US neighbor Nicaragua by selling them weapons?" Again with your whataboutism. My original point remains unchallenged.
    3
  8345.  @blitz12399  Zelenskyy had also obtained Soviet weapons from the U.S BEFORE Russia's special military operation began in 2022.
    3
  8346.  @blitz12399  Comparing apples to oranges? You're the one comparing Russia selling weapons to Nicaragua when that's not even the topic at all.
    3
  8347.  @D1it4FN  Because what's Meng Wanzhou's crime? Nobody knows, because USA refused release any information. It's like they get Canada to arrest Meng Wanzhou and then cook up an fake crime to accuse her of later. Since her arrest in 2019, these 2 years are spent trying to fabricate a crime to accuse Meng of, when in reality it's to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride that's all.
    3
  8348.  @yslee1401  Tulane virologist Robert Garry, PhD, and a team of researchers analyzed the genome sequence of the novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and found no evidence that the virus was made in a laboratory or otherwise engineered. Video: Virologist explains origins of COVID-19 youtu.be/YLykxJqTBpU
    3
  8349.  @wulfychen3058  Exactly, a supercomputer in China found that a young vaper in hospital for a “mysterious pneumonia” in the United States last summer could be a victim of coronavirus. The Tianhe-1 machine detected distinguished features – suggesting high probability of Covid-19 – in the CAT image of a patient who became severely ill between July and August in North Carolina, according to a diagnosis report seen by the South China Morning Post. The machine is at the National Supercomputer Centre in Tianjin. Link: scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3079046/chinese-supercomputer-and-american-doctors-clash-over-ai
    3
  8350.  @mlai2546  Canada also violate US sanctions on Iran but the USA choose to look the other way for Canada, but when China does it, USA abuse their extradition bill with Canada and detain Meng Wanzhou since 2019 for 2 years already, in order to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride. Source: CSIS alleges Iran used Toronto company to wire millions to Canada despite sanctions msn.com/en-ca/news/newspolitics/csis-alleges-iran-used-toronto-company-to-wire-millions-to-canada-despite-sanctions/ar-BB1biOEC And why do you keep on mentioning the two Canadians when you don't actually care about them?
    3
  8351.  @yslee1401  Read my source, a Toronto currency exchange business helped Iran secretly wire millions of dollars into Canada in violation of sanctions.
    3
  8352.  @D1it4FN  So why can't you name Meng Wanzhou's crime? Why did USA abuse their extradition bill to detain Meng Wanzhou for 2 years since 2019, and still haven't come up with her crime? It's clear that USA is trying to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride. Her defence lawyers have already said that Meng's case is full of holes and Canadian authorities violated Meng's rights several times, yet you're telling me Meng shouldn't resist?
    3
  8353.  @mlai2546  There are many companies that violated US sanctions on Iran, yet they were fined and the case was closed. Yet USA has produced no evidence of Meng's alleged crime and just get Canada to arrest Meng for 2 years since 2019. Video: Huawei CFO Lies youtu.be/SVhLvS9lCNs And why do you keep on bringing up the two Canadians when it's very clear that you care nothing about them? They were arrested AFTER Meng was detained by Canada, so it's Canada that started this whole mess, and they know exactly how to resolve this stalemate. Why would Meng use an iPhone? Huawei actually overtaken Apple as the world's 2nd most popular smartphone after Samsung, so what point are you trying to make here? Source: Reuters: Huawei overtakes Apple as world No. 2 smartphone seller, gains ground in China reuters.com/article/us-huawei-revenue-idUSKBN1KL0BN
    3
  8354.  @D1it4FN  USA is abusing the extradition bill with Canada. According to the US-Canada's extradition bill, the crime committed must be both a crime in USA and in Canada. But violating Iran sanctions is a crime in USA, not Canada. Her defence lawyers said the case is full of holes, yet the judge isn't convinced because the USA got Canada by the b**ls. The judge can't release Meng Wanzhou until the USA gives them the green light to do so, because Canada can't afford to provoke the USA. The Canadian authorities violated Meng's rights by taking her under custody without telling her why. They seized Meng's smartphone and electronic devices and prohibited Meng from speaking with her travel companion or anyone else, including a lawyer. The officers opened and viewed contents on her devices and also searched her luggage. Source: Meng's 'rights were violated' by border services: Botting garybotting.com/publications/articles/dr--gary-botting-mengs-rights-were-violated-by-border-services-botting
    3
  8355.  @D1it4FN  Fraud? Then why not just fine Huawei and get it over with? Instead USA and Canada drag this out for 2 years since 2019, because USA wants to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride. According to US-Canadian Extradition Treaty, the USA has to present Canada with evidence of the crime committed, before Canada agrees to extradite the suspect, yet USA did not present any evidence, yet Canada arrest Huawei CFO without proof? USA has a hold on Canada, look at Trudeau pausing when commenting on Trump's response to US protest. Clearly, USA has a hold on Canada, that's why the judge has to do everything in his power to detain Meng, until given the green light to release Meng by USA. Video: Trudeau pauses for 21 seconds before answering question about Trump's response to U.S. protests youtu.be/SeaDi-0Nz8w The Canadian court is already biased against Meng Wanzhou, yet you're claiming Meng should just sit down quietly and submit to it?
    3
  8356.  @D1it4FN  Because USA is abusing their extradition bill with Canada, they have no proof of Meng's crimes, yet they get Canada to arrest Huawei CFO first, to buy time while USA figures out what crime to slap on Meng. The arrest warrant for Meng wasn't even ready, yet Canadian authorities arrested Meng Wanzhou at the airport, confiscated her smartphone and devices and denied her the right to to contact her lawyer at the airport, yet you're suggesting that Meng just quietly submitted herself to the USA?
    3
  8357.  @D1it4FN  According to Article 9, Section 3 of Treaty on Extradition Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America, "When the request relates to a person who has not yet been convicted, it must also be accompanied by a warrant of arrest issued by a judge or other judicial officer of the requesting State and by such evidence as, according to the laws of the requested State, would justify his arrest and committal for trial if the offense had been committed there, including evidence proving the person requested is the person to whom the warrant of arrest refers." Source: Treaty on Extradition Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America treaty-accord.gc.ca/text-texte.aspx?id=101323 Yet USA did not even issue the warrant to Canada when the authorities arrested Meng Wanzhou at the airport, so isn't this a violation of Meng's rights as well as the US-Canada extradition treaty?
    3
  8358.  @D1it4FN  "神州 Shenzhou you must be wrong." Why can't you cite evidence to refute my points? Instead you just dismiss me as wrong, even after I cite evidence to support my arguments?
    3
  8359.  @D1it4FN  You said: "You're just throwing that up because she's Chinese." And you're just biased against Meng because she's Chinese. Her rights got violated at the airport when her phone and devices were confiscated and contents searched, even though Canada didn't even have an arrest warrant from the USA at that time. She was denied the chance to talk to her travelling companion or took phone her lawyer for advice before she was detained by Canadian border agency.
    3
  8360.  @D1it4FN  "神州 Shenzhou the extradition order was prepared in advance." Meng had earlier visited other countries that had an extradition bill with USA, such as Japan and Mexico, yet USA only made Canada detain Meng because USA wanted to strike a blow at the Canada-China relations, until the ties have deteriorated till what it is today. Canada has fallen right into this trap set by the United States.
    3
  8361.  @D1it4FN  You said: "To believe that the Americans simply want to pick a fight with CCP for reasons of spite is ludicrous." Look since 2018, Huawei has overtaken Apple as world's 2nd largest smartphone maker, after Samsung at number one. So it's possible that USA target Huawei in order to strike an economic blow against Huawei and hinder China's technological advancements. Source: Reuters: Huawei overtakes Apple as world No. 2 smartphone seller, gains ground in China reuters.com/article/us-huawei-revenue-idUSKBN1KL0BN
    3
  8362.  @D1it4FN  The legal system in the USA looks like it's breaking down. Look at how Trump's veto on the relief bill gotten overruled. Why is it that they can overrule a veto? Isn't a veto designed to overrule a policy, not to get overruled itself? What's the point of a veto then? Source: Congress Overturns Trump Veto On Defense Bill After Political Detour npr.org/2021/01/01/952450018/congress-overturns-trump-veto-on-defense-bill-after-political-detour
    3
  8363.  @yslee1401  Source: Forbes: No, COVID-19 Coronavirus Was Not Bioengineered. Here’s The Research That Debunks That Idea forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2020/03/17/covid-19-coronavirus-did-not-come-from-a-lab-study-shows-natural-origins/?sh=5fb1b36d3728
    3
  8364.  @songsabai3794  Canada started this whole mess by following USA orders to kidnap Meng Wanzhou, and they know exactly how to end this stalemate. And nobody seems to care about the two Canadians anyway, because they're nobodies compared to Huawei CFO.
    3
  8365.  @yslee1401  Indians love Chinese smartphones. Xiaomi was started in 2010. Today it's one of the world's most popular smartphones. In India, it's number one. Video: How Xiaomi broke out of China to go global | CNBC Reports youtu.be/291DlKa7iIU
    3
  8366.  @brennencox516  What other alternatives to re-education centres and massive surveillance? Look at the 9/11 terrorist attacks and USA choose to invade Iraq, would you prefer China do the same? What else could CPC have done to address those problems? You're just biased against China that's all, you care absolutely nothing for China's interests, nor do you actually want China to succeed under the Communist Party of China.
    3
  8367.  @D1it4FN  Why don't you get all those non-Native Americans, Canadians and Australians to Get Out of America and Australia and leave those lands to Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals? Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago during the Yuan Dynasty China (1200 AD) far longer than the entire colonial history of USA, Canada and Australia, yet you want China to give up our ancestral lands?
    3
  8368.  @D1it4FN  Goldstein, Melvyn C said that in his book entitled: A History of Modern Tibet (Vol 2): A Calm before the Storm: 1951–1959, 2007, pp. 106–107 Just claiming that a Google search doesn't produce the source of that quote, doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. Google is not everything.
    3
  8369.  @D1it4FN  The Americans did not care about Tibetan independence, they only wanted to undermine communist countries. In his 1991 autobiography Freedom in Exile, the 14th Dalai Lama criticized the CIA for supporting the Tibetan independence movement "not because they (the CIA) cared about Tibetan independence, but as part of their worldwide efforts to destabilize all communist governments". In 1999, the Dalai Lama claimed that the CIA Tibetan program had been harmful to Tibet because it primarily served American interests, claiming "once the American policy toward China changed, they stopped their help". Source: CIA Tibetan Program: Criticism wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Criticism This supported by the fact that after US President Nixon's 1972 visit to China, the Americans stopped supporting Tibetan independence. Today, the USA recognises Tibet Autonomous Region as part of the People's Republic of China.
    3
  8370.  @D1it4FN  You seem more biased against China’s achievements than you do for the United States. For example, you're calling for China to give up our ancestral land of Tibet, yet you're not against the non-Native Americans, Canadians and Australians getting out of America and Australia and leaving those lands to Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals. Why should China give up our ancestral land of Tibet which has been part of Chinese history since 800 years ago? That's already longer than the colonial history of America and Australia!
    3
  8371.  @D1it4FN  Here's a video of modern day Lhasa, Tibet, China (filmed by WildFilmsIndia) and you can see how developed Lhasa has become under communist party rule. Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, and modern technology like cars, telephone cables, computers, smartphones, WiFi, the Internet, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like (By WildFilmsIndia) youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo Even the poorest Tibetan farmer can afford a smartphone, connect to the Internet and shop online in Taobao and have his purchases shipped all the way to Tibet in the Himalayas. Because Tibet is part of China after all.
    3
  8372.  @D1it4FN  "神州 Shenzhou Chinese propaganda" The video was filmed by WildFilmsIndia so how's that Chinese propaganda? Here's a video entitled: Tibet: The Truth by Monarex Hollywood about the slavery in Tibet under the Dalai Lama rule. YouTube will prompt you that this video is offensive and inappropriate. Video: TIBET - The Truth [Chinese subtitles] HD youtu.be/Wvo8MXny5XI (Warning: Footage may be offensive or inappropriate for some viewers)
    3
  8373.  @D1it4FN  How am I shrill and emotional? I've been using logic and citing sources to support my arguments, but you given nothing to support yours, for example, you just claim the 14th Dalai Lama is not a traitor without explaining your argument. Whereas I have shown that the 14th Dalai Lama accepted US funds to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the central government.
    3
  8374.  @D1it4FN  Here's a video of Tibetan craft brewery in Lhasa, Tibet. Tibetan lives have largely improved under the communist party rule. Video: Worlds Highest Craft Beer Brewery - Lhasa Tibet youtu.be/UYCyhUyGuMw
    3
  8375.  @yslee1401  The 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and a traitor to his people. The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government (Beijing). Declassified CIA files have exposed that a total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) Source: CIA Tibetan program wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Costs So here we have concrete evidence that the 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the USA to engage in separatist activities against the Central People's Government.
    3
  8376.  Narglar Wing  Which part of our vast country of China did you live in? Many Chinese people welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors, just ask the expats like Gweilo 60, Barrett, Daniel Dumbrill, Nathan Rich, Alex Absolute, JaYoe Nation, and numerous others. As for being beaten up, many foreigners have remarked on how safe it is in China, compared to where they're from. Video: _How Safe is China Really??? _ youtu.be/J7TJOmqOmaE&t=6s Video: Is China actually safe? youtu.be/JTtVR3w7VXo Video: Is China a Safe Country? youtu.be/exT3Z0-5fqc As for Chinese media being critical of foreigners, it's because some of these foreigners misbehave in China. For example, there's this video about 3 foreigners in Qingdao jump the queue. Video: youtu.be/JhKOUG96ACo
    3
  8377.  Narglar Wing  What's wrong with Chinese buying up property in Canada? Since Canadians themselves put up their land for sale, then why can't Chinese buyers purchase those real estate legally, since they are for sale? What's your problem blaming China for doing business with you?
    3
  8378.  Narglar Wing  But you Canadians literally put up your lands for sale, then why can't Chinese buyers purchase those property legally? Chinese buyers fork out our hard-earned money to pay for the purchase of real estate, then why can't they prefer Chinese customers? Money is flowing out of China to Canada with each purchase of real estate, yet you rather blame China for buying what's for sale? Yes, Chinese government doesn't allow foreign ownership of our lands. All land in China belongs to the state, even us Chinese can't legally own property, so that people can't sell out our lands to foreigners.
    3
  8379.  Narglar Wing  The sale of Canadian property benefits Canadians, because Chinese are forking out our hard-earned money to pay for the purchase of property. Money is flowing out of China into Canada with each purchase, yet you Canadians blame Chinese buyers for doing business in Canada? I'm using simple logic to justify my argument, but you're using Canadian nationalism to pin the blame on Chinese property buyers, when Canadians put up their land for sale. Nobody point a gun at Canadians and forced you to sell your property, you did so willingly, then why blame China? You're just being racist against Chinese property buyers that's all, why accuse me of being Chinese nationalist? Just for justifying the sale of property?
    3
  8380.  Narglar Wing  How am I being disingenuous? Yes, Chinese can buy property (I never said we can't) but the property is signed in our name for a period of time, so ultimately, all land still belongs to the state in China. This is so that Chinese can't abuse our lands and sell then to foreigners, so what's wrong with our laws? This is our country, our laws after all. And you Canadians put your lands up for sale the property developers and real estate companies are Canadians. If they aren't, then Canadians sold their property to foreigners, so why blame Chinese buyers just for buying what's for sale? Because of your anti-China sentiment? And it's all Chinese money that's flowing into Canada, I thought we were talking about the benefits to Canadians, so why are you suddenly talking about money stolen from China? And Chinese buying several properties that they don't care about the people, that's simply Capitalism at work, why blame Chinese buyers for engaging in the ideology the Western capitalists believe in? Once again, you Canadians put your lands up for sale. Nobody force Canadians to do that, nobody point a gun at you Canadians and force you to sell your lands, you choose to, so why blame Chinese buyers for purchasing those property legally?
    3
  8381.  Narglar Wing  Your so-called Canadian lands actually once belonged to the aboriginals, before the Anglo-Saxon colonialisers stole their lands from America, Canada and Australia, yet you Canadians want to complain about selling your property to Chinese buyers, when the Anglo-Saxon literally stole the lands of aboriginals? The sheer irony of you accusing me of being racist and an ultranationalist, why don't you go look into a mirror yourself?
    3
  8382.  Narglar Wing  I'm using logic to argue my points, but you're just biased against China that's all, and blaming Chinese buyers for purchasing what's for sale. Nobody point a gun at Canadians and forced you to put up your lands for sale, you Canadians chose to do so willingly, even though the Anglo-Saxon literally stole Canada from the aboriginals. Yet you blame Chinese buyers when they fork out our hard-earned money to pay for the purchase of real estate? Did I ever said that the money was flowing into the pockets of average Canadians? Then why did you accuse me of saying such a thing? I said: "Money is flowing out of China to Canada with each purchase of real estate" but when did I ever said that it's flowing into the pockets of average Canadians? If you want the money to flow into average Canadian pockets then you'll need a communist revolution to overthrow the capitalist system in Canada. Because capitalism is making the rich richer, and the poor poorer.
    3
  8383.  Narglar Wing  China today is following "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics" where China is in the primary stage of socialism and needed to engage in economic growth before pursuing a more egalitarian form of socialism, with the eventual goal being communism (as described in Marxist orthodoxy). And I don't really care about Anglo-Saxon stealing the lands from aboriginals, but since you Canadians done that, then why are you complaining about Chinese buying up property that you Canadians literally put up for sale? I mean, nobody point a gun at Canadians and forced you to sell your lands (although you did point guns at aboriginals) then why blame Chinese buyers for engaging in capitalism in your country?
    3
  8384.  Narglar Wing  Hypocritical? I already logically dismantled your argument and I even pointed out the hypocrisy in Canadians willingly selling their lands to Chinese buyers, after having taken them from aboriginals, so who's the hypocrite here, blaming Chinese buyers just for buying what's for sale? You're just a Canadian nationalist that's anti-China that's all. Heck, if even if Chinese buyers weren't the ones purchasing Canadian land, you Canadians nationalist will find a way to blame China regardless.
    3
  8385.  @brennencox516  Look at France's approach. Source: France fights terror with camps for re-education thetimes.co.uk/article/france-fights-terror-with-re-education-camps-plan-7wg9vrrgd France will send radicalised Islamists to re-education centres under a €40 million plan to tackle extremism, which the prime minister says is the biggest threat to the nation since Hitler. The suspects will be taught their patriotic duties and forced to undergo psychological treatment in an attempt to counter jihadist indoctrination. Yet you ridicule China when we follow the same methods as France? You're just biased against China that's all.
    3
  8386.  @D1it4FN  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    3
  8387.  @D1it4FN  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    3
  8388.  @yslee1401  Why anti-China people who are unable to refute my points, always resort to hurling personal insults like claiming I'm being paid to post here?
    3
  8389.  @bartonlee3594  While it's not certain that the Indian economy will be bigger than China's, it's is certain that China's economy will be bigger than the US's (if it isn't already).
    3
  8390.  @KenVincente  "How's the housing market," Today China is a country of homeowners with more than 90% of households owning homes (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations (Huang et al., 2020). It is especially impressive that China has achieved this high rate within a short period of just three decades and is in sharp contrast to the recent decline of homeownership rate in the U.S., Western Europe and other developed countries.
    3
  8391.  @bartonlee3594  Who said the people in China can't access sites from abroad such as YouTube? Nobody will come and arrest you just for logging into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    3
  8392.  @rufanuf1  Taiwan has been under the authoritarian single-party rule of Kuomintang (Guomindang) for more than half its life. For decades, the KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, and Chiang Kai Shek was a dictator who jailed/executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived). Y Yet Taiwan flourished under KMT rule, resulting in the Taiwan Miracle. Between 1952 and 1982, economic growth was on average 8.7 percent, and between 1983 and 1986 at 6.9 percent. Taiwan GDP grew by 360 percent between 1965 and 1986, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680 percent between 1965 and 1986. All this was achieved under single-party KMT rule. Only in the 1990s, when democracy was introduced to Taiwan, that Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Today, Taiwan's economy is stagnant, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising, and many Taiwan graduates seek jobs in the mainland or in Singapore.
    3
  8393.  @rufanuf1  "神州 Shenzhou Prey tell what are these four great inventions?" Paper and Printing have made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge much easier. The Compass has made navigation through bad weather conditions much easier. And Gunpowder has made a huge impact on the way modern wars are fought.
    3
  8394.  @rufanuf1  You said: "I agree democracy is no panacea for solving the problems of a global community or civilization. Perhaps you can say the same" China never intended to impose our form of governance onto other countries, unlike the former USSR (or the USA with democracy). President Xi has publicly stated that China's political system is not for export. “We will not import other countries’ models, and will not export the China model. We will provide more opportunities for the world through our development." - President Xi Jinping You said: "All I know for a fact is that in recent human history it is always authoritarian states with dictatorial (criminally corrupt) leaders that start global wars." Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, etc were by Western democratic countries intervention in those countries.
    3
  8395.  @rufanuf1  You said: "Whats-more when you look at Chinese culture, yes there is great respect for family etc etc....but sadly there is little to no respect for anyone else." Respect has to be earned. If no respect is given to China, then frankly speaking, why should China offer respect in return? The West keeps on bringing up China's internal affairs in Xinjiang, Tibet, Hong Kong, etc, while they refuse to pay attention to domestic issues affecting their own country? You said: "OK its a functional society, but one that seems devoid of all wider social constructs of decency. It's "dog eat dog world." if your Chinese." How so? One of the CPC's founding political slogan is "Common Prosperity", aiming to bolster social equality and economic equity. China's poverty alleviation efforts have resulted in lifting millions of people out of poverty over the past decades. According to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty; China's poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015, as measured by the percentage of people living on the equivalent of US$1.90 or less per day in 2011 purchasing price parity terms, which still stands in 2022
    3
  8396.  @rufanuf1  You said: "Well maybe but almost without exception those wars were started in the name of the GLOBAL community under the rules of the UN." Take the Iraq War for example, and the UN Secretary General, Kofi Annan, has stated that the Iraq War was illegal and breached UN Charter. Mr Annan said that the invasion was not sanctioned by the UN security council nor in accordance with the UN's founding charter. You said: "I would understand if the US is getting fed up with being the world's global policeman. All they do is get criticism for trying to enforce rules that every nation signed up to a generation ago." The US is not even a signatory to the International Court of Justice in the Hague. After the court ruled that the US's covert war against Nicaragua was in violation of international law (Nicaragua v. United States), the United States withdrew from compulsory jurisdiction in 1986 to accept the court's jurisdiction only on a discretionary basis. Or take the I.C.C for example, and the US is not a signatory to it. Or even the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), and the US does not ratify it. Yet the US is enforcing rules that the US itself didn't sign on to?
    3
  8397.  @rufanuf1  About Nationalism, you're not even American yourself, yet you rush to defend US involvement in wars across the globe, then where does this "installed national pride" come from? Whereas I am Chinese and I love my country, yet when I bring up China's achievements under the CPC, I get labelled as having installed national pride?
    3
  8398.  @rufanuf1  Have you actually stopped to question why is it that you seem to be able to overlook whatever the US does, even though by your own admission, you're not even American yourself? If you claim that one good thing about democracies is the ability to point out mistakes, but if no action is being taken to correct said mistakes, then how exactly is the system going to evolve?
    3
  8399.  @rufanuf1  It's quite apparent from a global view that the West is in decline and that the East is rising. Why do you seem to think democracy is the best form of governance, given its inability to produce competent leaders?
    3
  8400.  @rufanuf1  If we draw upon the wisdom of history, the West today appears to resemble the Republic of Rome during its decline. If democracy is said to be able to fix this, why hasn't it done so?
    3
  8401.  @MarkYeung1  China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: Wikipedia: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities
    3
  8402.  @ThomasRosehands  By whom were your family were harassed and driven out of Hong Kong? There are actually lots of Hong Kongers that live in mainland China itself, but there are also Hong Kongers that have been approached by foreign powers seeking to promote separatism. As long as the One Country, Two System principle is followed (that Hong Kong is part of China) then your family should have no problem in Hong Kong.
    3
  8403.  @ThomasRosehands  Tell me what do you know about Hong Kong then. Previously, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into a British colony, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and Hong Kong people did not get to vote. It's thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people gets to vote in elections under the One Country, Two System policy, when Hong Kong didn't get to for 150 years as a British colony.
    3
  8404.  @MarkYeung1  Azov Battalion is full of neo-Nazi symbols, like the Swartiska, and the Wolfsangel, which are featured prominently among Azov Battalion ranks. The Azov Battalion worship one of the most infamous leaders of this ideology, Stepan Bandera. Zelenskyy supports this ideology by defending Azov Battalion and in fact, making it part of the Ukraine National Guard. So their ideology becomes Ukraine's ideology. "The Azov Regiment is not a volunteer (formation), but part of the National Guard.,” Zelensky said. “They are (part of) the official army of our state. Anyone who wanted to get involved in politics, (left the Azov Regiment). Those who decided to serve in the National Guard of Ukraine became part of the National Guard of Ukraine."
    3
  8405.  @item6931  "He did so to illustrate your exact same fallacy: "Some Jews were Nazis, therefore Zelensky could be a Nazi" (no evidence required, guilt assumed)." I did furbish evidence. The Azov Battalion supports this ideology, through displaying various symbols like the Swartiska and the Wolfsangel on their uniforms. They also worship one of the most infamous leaders of this ideology, Stepan Bandera, who tragically killed around 200,000 Poles in what is now western Ukraine.
    3
  8406.  @ole9215  There really wasn't a massacre at Tiananmen Square, and even Western journalists (like Jay Mathews of The Washington Post ) have come forth saying that "as far as can be determined from the available evidence, NO ONE DIED that night in Tiananmen Square, and all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. Source: The Myth of Tiananmen https://archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php
    3
  8407.  @dnivaranamaratis  If they were "bought" by China then why does Cyrus still need to include sponsors in his videos? Have you stopped to think about it?
    3
  8408.  @valenrn8657  According to the World Bank, in 2014, Ukraine exports to the Russian Federation totaled $9,899 million, with a partner share of 18 percent.
    3
  8409.  @valenrn8657  Russia conducted a referendum in Crimea, during which an overwhelming majority (97%) voted to join the Russian Federation. Therefore, Ukraine should respect the people of Crimea's territorial sovereignty.
    3
  8410.  @valenrn8657  "神州 Shenzhou Crimea''s referendum is invalid since it was during armed conflict." So you're saying that this armed conflict started in 2014, not in 2022?
    3
  8411.  @valenrn8657  You said: "The move towards a "hot war" between Ukraine and Russia has its trigger points from armed conflicts from Feb 2014." So it was a "cold war"? Then how is the 2014 Crimea Referendum invalid when it was during a period where there was no conflict? The overwhelming majority of Crimeans voted to join the Russian Federation as per the 2014 Referendum.
    3
  8412.  @valenrn8657  I'm asking you for whether you recognise the 2014 Crimea Referendum though.
    3
  8413.  @valenrn8657  On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia... The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position. ... Taken from The Diplomat: Shanghai Communique
    3
  8414.  @valenrn8657  "The US doesn't have territorial disputes while China has territorial disputes." Then why is the United States sending warships and aircraft carriers from across the Pacific Ocean to the South China Sea?
    3
  8415. Lenny A The gassing of Jews occurred during a specific period in history (WW2) so if such a show were shown in China, it would be for the sake of historical accuracy, not to be offensive. What about all those WW2 American movies about deaths of both German soldier and American soldiers?
    3
  8416.  @lakvenk6554  You said: "US law does not extend to other nations get the facts straight." So why was Meng arrested when she did not break any Canadian laws while in Canada? Since you said that US laws don't apply in other countries, then what crime did Meng Wanzhou do while in Canada, you tell me? Since you clearly stated US laws don't extend to other nations……
    3
  8417.  @dwaynebarnaby3598  China's ground-launched missiles have even demonstrated the ability to take out a satellite in orbit in space. In 2007, a 750kg satellite in orbit at an altitude of 865 kilometres (537 mi), was destroyed by a kinetic kill vehicle traveling with a speed of 8 km/s in the opposite direction, launched with a multistage solid-fuel missile from Xichang Satellite Launch Center or nearby.
    3
  8418.  @dwaynebarnaby3598  China has inducted the world's first operational anti-ship ballistic missile, a "carrier killer" capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, known as the DF-21D, launched from safety of the land and is able to target a carrier strike group out at sea. Video: /watch?v=p-cEunmqXM8
    3
  8419.  @CORVETTE_DUDE_CHANNEL  China is home to the world's most powerful laser at the Shanghai Superintense Ultrafast Laser Facility. But this laser is not used for destruction, it is used for research to prove whether its possible to create matter out of energy, that's all. China's Superintense Laser Could Create Matter From Energy Video: /watch?v=8aux0Vs5w0o
    3
  8420.  @JB52520  You said: "I've been really enthusiastic about China, but lately their friendship with Russia is making me feel like I made a mistake." China is neutral in the Ukraine conflict, and is in support of a peaceful end to it. China maintains good relations with both Russia and Ukraine, sending humanitarian aid to Ukraine, as well as continuing to maintain trade relations with Russia. Whereas it's NATO that's sending lethal aid to Ukraine and in fact, prolonging the conflict. So isn't it NATO that's supporting war, while China is supporting peace here? You said: "But since Russia's referendum at gunpoint" So you're saying that the minority 5-10% of people in the 4 regions who did not vote in favor of joining the Russian Federation are shot? Where are their bodies then?
    3
  8421. China has 5000 years of history, making China one of the world's oldest 'continuous' civilizations still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have long since faded to history. China therefore has thousands of years of political experience to draw upon to help guide our leaders.
    3
  8422. He actually said: "China doesn't have much in the way of territorial ambitions beyond reincorporating Taiwan at some point in the future and also settling disputes over parts of its border and the seas that surround it." And the statement is true.
    3
  8423. Ukraine has been supporting ultra-nationalist, neo-nazis such as the Azov Battalion in shelling villages in Donetsk and Luhansk (collectively known as Donbass) and UN estimates some 13,000 civilians have been killed over the course of 8 years. Russia isn't starting a war, it's ending the war that began with since the 2014 coup d'etat of Ukraine's government by USA and NATO.
    3
  8424.  @emperor270353  Agreed. The best course of action would be for Zelensky to surrender Ukraine and save the live of his people. It's apparent by now, that NATO and USA aren't going to send troops to defend Ukraine, and Ukraine's application into NATO is unlikely to be approved, because that would mean NATO is obliged to send troops to defend Ukraine if it were a NATO member. Ukraine has been effectively abandoned by NATO and the West, so the best course of action would be to surrender.
    3
  8425. And she won't take No for an answer, she will persist until she gets the answer that she want's to hear.
    3
  8426. China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate it as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because United States and its allies. The United States imposed additional conditions on China and when China joined the WTO, it agreed to considerably harsher conditions than other developing countries. You Americans have been opposing China since WTO so if you treat China like enemy, then why should we treat you like an ally?
    3
  8427.  abar rolugos  All foreigners including African, Caucasian, Asian, etc coming to China have to be quarantined for 14 days first, so how is it racism? Even overseas Chinese returning to China have quarantine.
    3
  8428. USA is diverse, but China is arguably even more diverse than USA, yet Chinese travellers are flying out of China and visiting other countries. However, many Americans aren't interested in travelling outside of the USA.
    3
  8429. USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    3
  8430.  Giovanni Sanchez  Dress like Westerners? Trousers (pants) were literally invented in China! The oldest known pair of trousers in the world were found at the Yanghai cemetery in Turpan, Xinjiang, western China and dated to the period between the 10th and the 13th centuries BC. So Westerners are literally wearing Chinese clothing today, what are you talking about?
    3
  8431.  Giovanni Sanchez  For the past couple of hundred years, yes. Britain was colonial superpower during 19th century but was eventually overtaken by USA in 20th century. But prior to that, China (and also India) had been economic superpower for 1800 years and we made up 25% of the world's GDP share, according to world leading British economist, Angus Maddison. Source: Global distribution of GDP among China, India, Western Europe, USA, Middle East from 1 AD to 2003 AD wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA_Middle_East.png And judging from the above trend, it looks as though China is all set to dominate the 21st century. Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by the rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (fine china) which were in great demand throughout the ancient world. Take Han Chinese traditional clothing Hanfu (汉服) for example and it has 5,000 years of history and even the Japanese Kimono and Korean Hanbok clothing have their origins in Chinese Hanfu. Video: Beautiful Traditional Costume: Han Chinese Clothing (Hanfu) youtu.be/T6CucJxiWec?t=5 But what makes you Chinese culture is destroyed? Have you actually been to China and witness Chinese culture for yourself?
    3
  8432.  Giovanni Sanchez  About possible nuclear war, look back during the Cold War and despite how bad relations were deteriorating between USA and USSR were, there was no hot nuclear war, although it came close to during Cuban missile crisis. Today, USA and China still have relations (Unlike USA and USSR), our world is far more interconnected today than during the Cold War period. Our international citizens are everywhere, airlines are currently locked down at the moment preventing mass travel, it's unlikely that there will be hot nuclear war given the high chance of killing own citizens. Another thing is that People's Liberation Army missile technology has vastly improved. China is home to the world's longest range ICBM, the DF-41 with operational range between 12,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the US LGM-30 Minuteman range of 13,000 km. Video: China missile test DF-41 launch from railroad train youtu.be/h2kjMctT8yU?t=13 This makes USA think twice before considering hot nuclear war with China, because our missiles are capable of reaching the US mainland.
    3
  8433.  Giovanni Sanchez  China has hypersonic missiles like the DF-ZF, which have been tested 7 times already and travels at speeds between 4,000 and 7,000 miles per hour. Source: China Successfully Tests Hypersonic Missile freebeacon.com/national-security/china-successfully-tests-hypersonic-missile/ U.S. intelligence officials have assessed that China plans to use the glider to deliver nuclear weapons through increasingly sophisticated missile defenses. The DF-ZF also could be used as part of a conventional strategic strike weapon capable of hitting targets around the world within an hour. If USA is going to decouple from China, then the cost of living in USA is going to increase, because China is still the most efficient and cost-effective factory of the world. Prices of Made-in-America products are going to be higher than Made-in-China products. Even India and Vietnam lack the infrastructure like ports to transport the sheer amount of cargo that passes through China everyday. Here are two lists of busiest ports in the world and Chinese ports (Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan, Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian, etc) dominate the lists. Source: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage#2012%E2%80%932017 Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports
    3
  8434.  Giovanni Sanchez  So even with deteriorating US-Soviet relations, there was no nuclear war whereas US-China relations today, while bad, isn't as bad as it was during the Cold War, so nuclear option is unlikely based historical assessment. As for One Party System, China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. Yet you claim USA is going to decouple from China in the next 10 years? Unlikely.
    3
  8435.  Giovanni Sanchez  What's wrong with following communism? Using a non-Chinese example, back in 1917, Russia was once arguably the poorest country in Europe filled with dirt-poor peasants suffering under the corrupt Russian Tsar monarchy. Russia was poor and technologically backward compared to the more developed richer Western European countries. But after the 1917 Communist revolution by the Bolsheviks, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe both militarily and economically. That's why NATO was formed, in response to Russia transforming from the poorest country in Europe to the strongest in Europe. The Soviet Union economy was second in the world from 1960-1985, only to the United States. Source: Soviet Union was world's 2nd largest economy from 1960-1985 wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_largest_historical_GDP#Overview_of_the_ten_largest_economies And it's all been achieved under the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, from poorest to strongest in Europe. China's 5-year plans were adopted from the Soviet Union, whereas US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years, so USA can't make any long term plans against China. This is the superiority of China's one party system over the USA two party system.
    3
  8436.  @kalitech2026  The USA attacked Iraq and killed its leader, Saddam Hussein, on suspicion of harbouring Weapons of Mass Destruction. But after the Iraq War, no evidence of WMDs were found in Iraq, so isn't that an unprovoked attack by USA on Iraq? Yet you claim USA will never attack China without provocation?
    3
  8437.  @kalitech2026  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. So which country is the real threat to global peace and stabilized here?
    3
  8438. One of China's goals is to strive towards a Community with a Shared Destiny for Mankind (人类命运共同体).
    3
  8439. Indian supersonic missile Brahmos? What about China's hypersonc missile DF-ZF, capable attaining speeds up to 10 times that of sound, and having been tested 7 times successfully?
    3
  8440.  @yeusean  Possibly both. The United States could have threatened to revoke their U.S citizenship (if any) and send these overseas Uighurs back to China. They could also be paid to lie about Xinjiang, because it that's what happens with some North Korean defectors; they get paid by South Korean government to embellish their negative stories of life in North Korea.
    3
  8441.    Who's talking about China here? In my post I was talking about many ASEAN countries buying into Western rhetoric and voting against Russia in UN general assembly.
    3
  8442.  @brianplum1825  USA government can deny Huawei access than why can't Apple deny US government unlock encryption request? Didn't Julian Assange and Edward Snowden of Wikileaks already exposed US surveillance activities on its allies and secretly monitoring their own citizens conversations for keywords relating to terrorism?
    3
  8443.  @santosturmio8189  Why resort to calling me a wumao, just because I defend Peng Shuai's right to privacy? It's already embarrassing for her previous relationship with a much older man to be exposed, so she's trying to lay low and avoid the public eye, yet Western MSM are demanding that she appear in public to reveal more about her private life?
    3
  8444.  @santosturmio8189  Peng Shuai has confirmed her wish for privacy through the video call with IOC, yet Western MSM are determined to dig up details of her private life for all the world to see?
    3
  8445.  @santosturmio8189  "神州 Shenzhou Did you even see/read her original Weibo post ?" Did you?
    3
  8446. Chinese banks are willing to approve loans to countries that few other banks are willing to lend to, such as Pakistan and Sri Lanka. If Japan and EU banks offer much more attractive rates, than why don't these countries seek loans from those banks instead of China's? China never force those countries to acquire loans from Chinese banks if they don't want to.
    3
  8447. China does not set any upper limits to how much a country can choose to borrow. Its their choice if they want to borrow small amount, or to borrow big amount. But how can you claim that EU and Japan banks can just decide what's best for other countries? The faster a country's infrastructure gets developed, the faster it can start earning money to pay back loans.
    3
  8448. If Chinese interest rates are really so unfavourable as compared to Japan and EU rates, then why don't countries like Sri Lanka and Pakistan obtain loans from Japan and EU then? Nobody forcing anyone to take loans from China, if you find our interest rates too high.
    3
  8449.  @Bratt77  You can't refute my points so you resort to hurling insults against me for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours? Why not attempt to attack my points instead of attacking me personally?
    3
  8450. Yes, many Chinese tourists do enjoy eating durian (the King of Fruits) and also seafood like crayfish, lobsters, abalone from other countries.
    3
  8451.  @chuckpioneer1783  What's your point then? According to you, both countries have access to citizens data, the only seeming difference is that Western social media either leaks or sells user data (despite promising their users they don't) at a profit to themselves.
    3
  8452. Singapore is ruled by authoritarian PAP for its entire life as a nation for more than 50 years already. How is that a democracy?
    3
  8453. +PRCseparatedChina Taiwan Why is it that your Foxconn decide to set up shop in the mainland and hire mainland workers, instead of hiring Taiwan workers? Today, the mainland have so many Chinese companies like Huawei, Lenova, Oppo, ZTE, Xiaomi, Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, JD, etc, but how many famous Taiwan companies are there worldwide besides Foxconn? List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies
    3
  8454.  @ColoniaMurder20  Death toll of the American-Phillippine War: United States: 4,200 killed. The Philippines: 16,000-20,000 killed. Filipino Civilians: 200,000–1,000,000 died, most because of famine and disease; including 150,000-200,000 dead from cholera. ... What has China done in comparison to what US did to Philippines?
    3
  8455.  @item6931  "The old China ended after the Cultural Revolution, which destroyed the Four Old." What are the Four Olds and what makes you think they are destroyed? China's 5,000 years of history and our culture is far too vast to be wiped out by any single event. For example, China still have many historical monuments such as the Great Wall of China, the Forbidden City, Qin Emperor's Tomb, The Grand Canal (world's longest artificial river).
    3
  8456.  @lucyebajo8625  "神州 Shenzhou If the Philippines was colonize by Japan and US,is that a problem with you?" It become a problem when these countries are directed to contain China by the U.S.
    3
  8457.  @henrytep8884  You said: "China is causing so the commotion there. They get a bad portrayal because they’re stealing fish from the Philippines," Show me which fish did China stole from the Phillipines? The Philippines coastguard (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) had shot to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng (洪石成) but which Filipino fisherman did Chinese coastguard shoot? Answer: None!
    3
  8458.  @henrytep8884  You asked: "Do you know the difference in cost between land transportation Vs sea transportation?" So what happens when the Houthis in Yemen decide to target cargo vessels passing through the Red Sea on their way to Europe? Those vessels will now have to reroute, taking the long way by sailing south to the Cape of Good Hope, as was done in the Middle Ages. The new route is approximately 3,500 nautical miles longer, increasing operating costs and delivery times between Asia and Europe by about 9 days. Wouldn't land-based rail freight seem like an attractive alternative right now?
    3
  8459.  @henrytep8884  You said: "Also show me where the belt and road initiative is finally paying off?? Where?" The Laos-China Railway opened in 2021, connecting the landlocked country of Laos to the border with Yunnan, China. According to the transport authorities, from Jan 2021 to Dec 2021, the Laos–China Railway as a whole transported over 1 million passengers and 500,000 tonnes of cargo. As more time passes, the railway can be expected to pay off as more passengers and cargo gets transported.
    3
  8460.  @henrytep8884  You said: "You still didn’t answer that question. Those numbers exist, I’m asking you if you know what they are." You didn't even answer my earlier question of which fish did China stole from the Phillipines, now you're demanding answers out of me? And calling me ignorant and hurling other personal insults against me for my views?
    3
  8461.  @henrytep8884  "Shenzhou. I only care about the bottom line." That's not the point, you specifically asked me to show you "where the belt and road initiative is finally paying off?" But after I brought up the success of the Laos-China Railway, you just dismiss it and move the goalpost afterwards. And you've been taking every opportunity to verbally insult me after I've answered your question.
    3
  8462.  @henrytep8884  Why don't you answer my earlier question of Which fish did China steal from the Phillippines?, instead of asking more questions?
    3
  8463.  @henrytep8884  Since you've repeatedly stated that you're not going into debate mode, then why on earth should I continue answering your questions, when you refuse to answer mine? Had you truly been capable of debate, then you wouldn't have resorted to hurling verbal abuse and attacking me personally for my views.
    3
  8464.  @henrytep8884  "Shenzhou. I’m not on the fish anymore. We’re beyond that." No you haven't answered my question. The Chinese fisherman was within the EEZ, so he wasn't stealing fish. And instead of answering my question, you just dismiss it and continue demanding more answers out of me?
    3
  8465.  @henrytep8884  You said: "You already know Chinese fishing boats are within the Philippines border," Which Chinese fishing boats are near the Philippines border? The Spratly Islands is not part of Philippine territory according to the 1898 Treaty of Paris. The treaty drew up Phillippine's maritime boundaries which does not encompass the Spratly Islands. When the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (now Taiwan) published the 11-Dash Line in 1947, the Phillipines did not launch any objection to China's claim to the Spratly Islands.
    3
  8466.  @henrytep8884  Turns out that the international Hague tribunal that ruled in favor of Phillippines over the South China Sea, is the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which only happens to share same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice (ICJ). But the PCA is not an official UN agency unlike the ICJ, therefore the tribunal does not hold the same judicial powers as the ICJ when it comes to matters of territorial sovereignty. Therefore, China reserves the right not to accept the tribunal's ruling, given that it's not an official UN agency.
    3
  8467.  @zackk4393  African-American Muslim activist Malcolm X spoke admiringly of Mao's global leadership at a rally in Harlem in November 1964. "They used to have a saying that one doesn't have a Chinaman's chance. But they don't say that any more. They used that expression back when China was weak. But now that Mao Zedong has been successful in making China a strong country, the Chinese have more chance than anybody else. So this saying has become outdated. Well just as it took a strong China to give a Chinese person respect wherever that Chinese person is found on this earth, when we get a strong Africa, the person of African origin or African ancestry will be respected anyplace on this earth, even in America. But he will not be respected in America until Africa is strong, just as the Chinaman wasn't respected abroad until China became strong." - Malcom X
    3
  8468.  @zackk4393  If you want to read a book about China, why not read 《When China Rules the World》by Martin Jacques? It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set and many economists firmly believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's economy sometime in the foreseeable future. Video: When China Rules the World (By Martin Jacques) youtu.be/3G1EyvRZmOs
    3
  8469.  @amc3463  In 2014, there was a coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukoyvch by the United States and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine. Russia is not starting a war, they and ending one that began over 8 years ago and cost the lives of some 13,000 Ukrainians since 2014.
    3
  8470.  @rpg1663  That's because China stood a fighting chance against the aggressor and even eventually the USA joined after Pearl Harbour was bombed by the Japanese. But as for Ukraine, NATO and the USA aren't going to send troops to defend Ukraine, and neither are they willing to honor Zelenskyy's request for a No-Fly Zone over Ukraine, so how's Ukraine going to turn the tides against Russia? Ukraine's membership to NATO is unlikely to be successful, because that would mean NATO is obliged to send reinforcements to defend Ukraine if it were a member, so I just can't see that happening. Then what other choice is there except for Ukraine to surrender? But by refusing to surrender, Zelenskyy is only prolonging the war and using Ukrainian lives as a human shield. By releasing prisoners and arming civilians with rifles, Zelenskyy is trying to maximise the civilian casualties. By removing the age restrictions for conscription, Zelenskyy is effectively enlisting child soldiers to fight and die for his refusal to surrender.
    3
  8471. +Daniel Vedberg Sekulic It was the KMT that started the whole Chinese Civil War, when Chiang Kai-shek purged thousands of communists during the Shanghai massacre of 12 April 1927. So how is Mao Zedong directing unlawful war in China? What do you even mean by unlawful war? Tibet was part of China since 800 years, and Tibet broke free of Qing dynasty China in 1912, but was reincorporated back in 1951 (after 49 years) so how is it illegal? In 1951, the Tibetans signed the Seventeen Point Agreement (Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet) acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet, so how is it illegal? Vietnam had invaded Cambodia and overthrew its government, so as Cambodia's ally, China retaliated to teach Vietnam a lesson that's all. Also, Pol Pot was not Cambodia's founder, Tsar Alexander the 2nd was not Finland's founder, and neither are Mussolini and Hitler the founders of their respective countries, so why are you just labeling them as founders?
    3
  8472. Dev The Doge 那你来说，哪个国家媒体没有偏见的？哪国的媒体是公正、客观和可信的？
    3
  8473. Asia is part of the Old World, and we had well established cultures and people in our lands, whereas America (including Costa Rica) is part of the New World, and unless you are Native American yourself then everyone is immigrant there.
    3
  8474. "for the nationalists, who kept the Chinese flag in Taiwan, were swimming in wealth while Mao had China swimming in blood and eating dirt." The Nationalist Kuomintang had plenty of wealth, money, not to mention military arms given to them by the West, as well as superior numbers over the Communists. Defeating the Communists should have been a piece of cake for them, yet the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of poor, outnumbered, starving peasants and had to flee to Taiwan island. It just goes to show that the KMT isn't fit to rule the mainland after all. Corruption was so rampant in the KMT, even the US President Truman made a remark about it, and wrote that the "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", having taken $750 million in US aid. Swimming in wealth indeed.
    3
  8475.  @paulputyong3244  Huawei overtook Apple as the world's 2nd largest smartphone maker, only behind Samsung at number 1. More and more people worldwide are buying Huawei phones as compared to Apple iPhones.
    3
  8476.  @OlJackBurton  Including the freedumb to "ruin their lives" if they want to? At such a young age? Those are your words, you're literally advocating for kids to abuse drugs, drink alcohol, gamble away their parent's money, even before their adult life truly begins, what sort of negative mindset is this where you justify kids being allowed to ruin their lives in the name of "freedom"?
    3
  8477.  @deathtomorons9388  serpentza is not even living in China at the moment, what makes you think he knows the reality of China?
    3
  8478.  @OlJackBurton  You literally said that "If people want to ruin their own lives they should be allowed to." then you're advocating for kids to stray away and get hooked on addictive activities like drugs, gambling, drinking alcohol at such a young age. That's what's meant by "ruining their lives" isn't it? "Where else in the world is playing video games (or watching TV or using the Internet, social media, etc.) illegal?" In 2011, South Korea instituted a law that blocked video game access from midnight until 6 am for players under the age of 16 in an effort to curb adolescent gaming addiction. You're acting like China is the only country in the world to do implement video game restriction for minors? "And why would they gamble and steal digital money, since there is hardly any cash in China?" There's this kid who stole ¥2,000 from his grandmother's wallet to buy equipment for his mobile phone game. "Their parent's money is for them anyway." For them to spend on real things, like buying a house, getting married, etc, not for spending their parents savings on in-game mobile phone purchases. "Unless the government doesn't allow parents to spend their money and time how they wish with their kids." Playing mobile phone games is not the same as parents spending time with their kids. There's so many other ways that parents can spend time with their kids, including picnics, sports, cycling, dancing, singing, etc, yet you're acting as though video games is the only way that parents get to spend time with their kids? "Why would they hate their parents? China is supposed to be a Confician country where filial piety is the natural rule. You're projecting." You literally just projected China as entirely Confucian yourself, and imply that every child observes filial piety, but obviously this is not the case in all China, and there exists unfilial kids.
    3
  8479.  @OlJackBurton  You said: "Or air pollution laws which are only enforced to make the skies blue for the world to see only during the Olympics." China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/j3J196bLP5E
    3
  8480.  @MeiinUK  About genetic lineage of Chinese citizens, during the Qing Dynasty, the Qing government declared China a multi-ethnic state. After conquering "China proper", the Manchus identified their state as "China" (中國, Zhōngguó; "Middle Kingdom"), and referred to it as Dulimbai Gurun in Manchu (Dulimbai means "central" or "middle," gurun means "nation" or "state"). The emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, Tibet and other areas) as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that "China" only meant Han areas. The Qing emperors proclaimed that both Han and non-Han peoples were part of "China". As long as you were born in China, then you are considered as Chinese citizen and granted citizenship accordingly. Just like the United States is consist of Caucasian Americans (white), African Americans (black), Latin Americans (brown), Asian Americans (yellow) and Native Americans (red), China today has 55 different ethnic groups living in our lands.
    3
  8481.  @MeiinUK  About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    3
  8482.  @MeiinUK  Why don't you tell the non-Native Americans, Canadians and Australians to get out of America and Australia and leave those lands to Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals then? America is a multi-racial country today with Caucasian, African, Latino, Asian and Native American heritage, so why can't China be home to 55 different ethnic groups?
    3
  8483.  @zackk4393  But according to Wikipedia: A Madman's Diary, the diary form was inspired by Nikolai Gogol's short story "Diary of a Madman", as was the idea of the madman who sees reality more clearly than those around him. It's a work of fiction, not based on a true story.
    3
  8484. To people who disagree with One-Child Policy, you are all entitled to your own views of course, but China is world's most populous country, and at that time, China had high child malnutrition, starvation, low literacy and poor healthcare. Why have so many kids born, only to die from hunger, or not enough schools to sent them, and not enough hospitals to provide adequate healthcare? Why not focus all your resources into raising a single healthy kid into adulthood and get into a good school and break the whole cycle of poverty? According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. Of course, there are unforeseen consequences like the gender imbalance, but how else do you expect the CCP to lift China out of poverty? There are also other options such as importing Vietnamese brides to make up for the shortfall of women in China. I mean, its not like its the end of the world isn't it?
    3
  8485.  @askyalumumba3573  Perhaps Chinese EVs might first make it big in Mexico, before migrating upwards towards United States and Canada.
    3
  8486.  @priscillaferguson267  From what I understand, Swedish company Volvo is currently owned by the Chinese company Geely Holding Group based in Zhejiang, and currently Volvo offers in the U.S only electrified models (mild hybrid, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or all-electric).
    3
  8487. Sounds like every non-Anglo Saxon country has their version of serpentza and laowhy.
    3
  8488. Normally, I'll expect American/Canadian Chinese food to taste different from authentic Chinese cuisine, given that the locals often modify recipes to suit their local palette. Having been to China and sampling our street food yourself, how does the street food in Richmond Night Market compare to in China?
    3
  8489.  @mxlo7177  If the Communist Party of China has done an excellent job transforming China from one of the world's dirt-poor countries into the world's 2nd largest economy, then can't the CPC be commended for their efforts?
    3
  8490. India thought USA was supporting her, but when President Trump started slapping tariffs on steel and aluminum, then only the true enemy is made clear.
    3
  8491. Apart for Russia, China has the DF-ZF hyper sonic glide vehicle, mounted on DF-17 medium range missiles. Video: DF-ZF Most Dangerous Missile– DF-17 China Hypersonic Missile youtu.be/AFn-fe9L0x4
    3
  8492. Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous relationship with a much older man has been revealed. In traditional Chinese mindset, dating a much older man is still considered a shameful thing to do, so Peng Shuai is avoiding the public eye for a while until this all blows over, and she has expressed her desire for privacy in a video call with IOC. But the WTA is trying to pry into her personal affairs and demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see.
    3
  8493.  @walterwayne3081  Exactly. I've lost count of how many times others told me that it's not.
    3
  8494.  @SuhandiWijaya  I heard that the Indonesian PM Soharto had considered Chinese Indonesians as a problem (Masalah Cina "Chinese Problem") and that expressions of Chinese culture through language, religion, and traditional festivals were banned and the ethnic Chinese were pressured to adopt Indonesian-sounding names.
    3
  8495.  @SuhandiWijaya  "神州 Shenzhou Wow, youtube keeps deleting my replies." The censorship on YouTube is horrible indeed. It's a pity that some Chinese culture, language and even Chinese names were deleted under Soeharto government, but I hope that Chinese Indonesians at least rediscover their lost roots.
    3
  8496.  @BlueTJLP  Nothing wrong with being a journalist, but why go about masquerading as a tourist? You are lying to Chinese authorities and breaking Chinese laws while in China, so why should China welcome these people?
    3
  8497.  @valuedcustomer8922  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    3
  8498.  The Snurger  Why do you resort to hurling personal insults against me for my views, instead of attacking my points?
    3
  8499.  @yslee1401  Why do people keep bringing up Meng's residence? Meng is still prevented from performing her job as Huawei's CFO if she can't leave her home, USA is doing this in order to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride that's all.
    3
  8500.  @lugaritzbrown2250  Under Chairman Mao, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Under Mao, China's life expectancy at birth nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 and is considered among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al.). Infant mortality was cut in half under Mao, and adult illiteracy was also similarly halved. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%.
    3
  8501.  @bartonlee3594  "The problem: Xi is cracking down on free enterprise." Capitalism breeds monopolies, just look at American monopolies like Facebook, Amazon, Google, Apple dominating their respective industries and eliminating competition from smaller American firms, stifling innovation through competition in the process. China has an anti-monopoly law that cracks down on anti-competitive practices in Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, effectively freeing up space for smaller Chinese firms to survive and compete innovatively.
    3
  8502.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "So a lot of our smart engineers (like me) choose to live overseas" Back when China was still a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, China experienced brain drain of our talent. However, sinophobic sentiment is rising in the West, resulting in what's called "reverse brain drain" where talent flows from a developed country to a developing country (in this case, from the West to China).
    3
  8503.  @12time12  "神州 Shenzhou under chairman mao 30-50 million died of starvation" Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they died of starvation (like you said) because of the Great Chinese Famine, which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because his aim is to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    3
  8504.  @12time12  "神州 Shenzhou if that’s the case your country wouldn’t rely on intellectual property theft from Europe and the USA to get anywhere." In the past, the United States relied on Intellectual Property from the United Kingdom. According to an article in the The Boston Globe entitled: A nation of outlaws, a hundred years ago, it was U.S that stole U.K intellectual property. Excepts: Taking a page from the British, who had pioneered many ingenious methods of adulteration a generation or two earlier, American manufacturers, distributors, and vendors of food began tampering with their products en masse -- bulking out supplies with cheap filler, using dangerous additives to mask spoilage or to give foodstuffs a more appealing color. ... _ In the literary realm, for most of the 19th century the United States remained an outlaw in the world of international copyright. The nation's publishers merrily pirated books without permission, and without paying the authors or original publishers a dime. When Dickens published a scathing account of his visit, "American Notes for General Circulation," it was, appropriately enough, immediately pirated in the United States. In one industry after another, 19th-century American producers churned out counterfeit products in remarkable quantities, slapping fake labels on locally made knockoffs of foreign ales, wines, gloves, and thread. As one expose at the time put it: "We have 'Paris hats' made in New York, 'London Gin' and 'London Porter' that never was in a ship's hold, 'Superfine French paper' made in Massachusetts."_
    3
  8505.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Don't call Pakistan and India blood brothers. They don't even call themselves blood brothers." Because the "colonial mentality" taught them not to. If you look at history, Pakistani and Indians share the same civilizational roots, they share the same history right up to 1947. It's because of the British that unnecessary blood has been split over the partitioning of British India. Even though the British have physically decolonized from India, the decolonization of the mind needs to break the mental chains that the colonizer impose on the minds of the colonized. Only then can India truly be free.
    3
  8506.  @Apache1970  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Pakistan & India don't have a shared history" Where was Pakistan before the 1947 partition? Answer: Pakistan was part of British India before 1947. Present-day Pakistan is home to the Indus Valley Civilization (one of the earliest human civilizations). Even the Vedic Civilisation flourished in the ancient Gandhāran city of Takṣaśilā, now Taxila in the Punjab. It's apparent that Pakistan and India have a shared history right up to the 1947 British partitioning.
    3
  8507.  @MK_ULTRA420  It's the opinion of many Chinese (including myself) that another 4 years of Trump is good for China. Source: Opinion: Why China is rooting for Trump to win marketwatch.com/story/why-china-is-rooting-for-trump-to-win-11596656684
    3
  8508.  @Daylightmotion  Singapore has been ruled by authoritarian single-party PAP for its entire life as a nation! For over 50 years, the PAP ruled Singapore with iron fist, and Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore's founder) was a dictator who jailed or exiled dissidents to his rule. Likewise, China has been ruled by authoritarian single party CCP for 70 years. So how are our political systems any different?
    3
  8509.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Why did Russia kill Alexei Navalny?" Navalny died of a blood clot, how's that suddenly Russia's fault?
    3
  8510.  @MarkYeung1  "I disagree with the Ukrainian official." Not only you, but many Chinese and Indians also disagree with the Ukrainian official's remarks, so why should China and India support Ukraine given such derogatory remarks made by Zelenskyy's advisor? "But he is entitled to his opinion. So as other Ukrainians." As are Chinese and Indians entitled to our opinions. Why should Chinese and Indians support Ukraine? At least Russian officials don't make such remarks towards China and India.
    3
  8511. United State's economic growth is about 3.1% China's economic growth is 6.4%
    3
  8512.  Jon Doe  Trump's tariffs have adversely affected American companies and contrary to what Trump says, it's they who they are paying for the tariffs not China. And the tariffs trickle down to the affect the consumers (Americans themselves) And American farmers are also bearing the brunt of the trade war, many farmers have stocks rotting away in storage because they can't sell them to China. China does not want the trade war to continue, but that does not mean China will just sit there and take punches. We are not afraid of trade war and we will retaliate with tariffs of our own if we are driven to a corner by US's aggressive protectionism.
    3
  8513. North Korea threatens USA bases in South Korea, Okinawa Japan, and Guam. Nothing to do with China here. We can't get rid of US bases in these regions. Why not USA withdraw its forces from these regions first, then sit down to discuss issues with N. Korea? American taxpayer always complain about high US military expenditure, and Trump already wants to reduce military expenditure in NATO, so why do the same thing in East Asia? Sanctions clearly do not seem to work on N. Korea.
    3
  8514. New Zealand's Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has announced a nationwide lockdown after the country confirmed one coronavirus case.
    3
  8515.  @Dr_stone666  I quoted an article to support my argument, yet you're accusing me of denial? Even till today, scientists are still unsure as the exact origin of Covid-19.
    3
  8516.  @michaelkatz275  "Not this year." This year is just beginning, we are entering into March, yet you can claim the Ruble won't be the best this year?
    3
  8517. The USA is much more advanced in robotic surgery than China. Maybe USA already does that to its citizens.
    3
  8518. How is Taiwan a successful example of democracy? Taiwan had been ruled by authoritarian single-party Kuomintang for more than half its life! For decades, the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and KMT leader Chiang kai-shek jailed and executed his dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and he imposed martial law (台湾省戒严令) on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan flourished and rapidly modernized in what's known as Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 and 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 and 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan's GDP grew by 360% between 1965 and 1986 and the percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 and 1986. And it had been achieved under authoritarian single party KMT rule. Only when democracy was introduced (because the USA threaten to ban weapon sales to Taiwan if KMT did not introduce political reforms) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest in 1990s. Today, Taiwan's economy is in a slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is high, and Taiwan graduates are unable to find work at home, so many seek employment opportunities overseas, in the mainland or in places like Singapore.
    3
  8519. Politics should be about doing what's right, not what's popular. Sometimes, the popular thing may not be right, and the right thing may not be popular. Democracy, when reduced to its basic fundamentals, is primarily about doing what's popular, not necessarily what's right.
    3
  8520. Video: China-made exoskeleton robot gives hope to paraplegics youtu.be/3_o8nthlIIA
    3
  8521.  @joesmith9139  If Europe is truly working to address climate change, then why did the EU impose tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and solar panels? Cheap EVs and solar panels would facilitate widespread adoption of these green technologies and work towards addressing climate change.
    3
  8522.  @joesmith9139  You said "looking at objective evidence" but where's your evidence that mining and manufacturing in Europe are greener than in China? Solar panels generate clean energy to power homes, not even cycling can match it. Also, not everyone can cycle, there are elderly people or people with disabilities that make cycling not a convenient option, so why not have electric vehicles instead? And if such technologies were bad, why'd the EU only specifically choose to impose tariffs on Chinese solar panels and EVs, instead of a blanket ban on all solar panels and EVs?
    3
  8523.  @MarkYeung1  Ukraine has vowed many times to retake Crimea, yet so far, they've had no success. Yet you're claiming Ukraine can somehow retake the two republics? When they can't even retake Bakmut, Maripol, etc?
    3
  8524.  @MarkYeung1  Again, the fact that Ukraine cannot retake Crimea, then what makes you think Ukraine can retake the two republics? You claimed a stalemate, yet it's apparent that Russia continues to hold on to Crimea and the two republics. In fact, Russia has added the four oblasts of Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia to the Russian Federation.
    3
  8525.  @MarkYeung1  The referendum held in Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia oblasts resulted in a majority of people wanting to join the Russian Federation. Even in 2014, the Crimea Referendum revealed that an overwhelming majority (97%) voted to join the Russian Federation. ... (Source: Wikipedia: 2014 Crimean status referendum)
    3
  8526. He's a property tycoon in China, as well as a member of the Communist Party of China, so why would he go missing?
    3
  8527.  @SlicedBreaddd  "神州 Shenzhou it would be pretty embarrassing if a member of the communist party leak the secrets of the communist party no?" What secrets did Ren Zhiqiang leak then, you tell me?
    3
  8528.  @Notorious_biggest  Are you stalking me?
    3
  8529.  @SlicedBreaddd  Ren Zhiqiang criticised China by calling Xi Jinping a "clown" so how does that help? Source: Critic who called Xi a ‘clown’ over Covid-19 crisis investigated for ‘serious violations’ theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/08/critic-xi-jinping-clown-ren-zhiqiang-covid-19-outbreak-investigated-china And he isn't missing, he's being investigated and undergoing disciplinary review and supervision by the Beijing discipline inspection commission.
    3
  8530.  @Notorious_biggest  Orders for ventilators are pouring in and China is working 24/7 making ventilators. Video: China is working 24/7 to make ventilators youtu.be/kJ81HY_M-zI Ventilators can determine if some Covid-19 patients live or die. Doctors from Italy to the US desperately need them and orders at factories are pouring in. "There's literally no country in the world that doesn't want to buy a ventilator from China right now. We have tens of thousands of orders waiting. The issue is how fast we can make them." - Li Kai, Director of Beijing Aeonmed
    3
  8531.  @rpg1663  First you said: "Having the biggest GDP is far from being what dictates the world's reserve currency." Next, you literally contradict your earlier statement by saying: "China would need almost 5 times the USA GDP," so what are you trying to say?
    3
  8532.  @fukushimaisrevelation2817  As for India, you boasted about India looking at potentially 2 billion people in a couple of decades, but you've repeatedly mentioned about the 5th Industrial Revolution about "robots making robots" then what good does a huge population play when the industrial capacity is fueled by robotics, not manpower? In fact, China is currently the world's largest market for automation and this enables China to retain industrial competitiveness through robotics. China is already home to Asia's first fully automated port in Qingdao, that's not only more efficient but also able to operate 24 hours, even at night in complete darkness loading and unloading ships. You've also boasted that India is perhaps better situated to dominate the Indian Ocean and its region compared to China, but the Indian Ocean is a bigger territory than the South China Sea, so how is India able to dominate the ocean? China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) Navy is arguably the largest navy in the world by number of ships compared to the Indian Navy, and China patrols the smaller South China Sea compared India having to patrol the bigger Indian Ocean. And what mainland aggression in Hong Kong are you talking about? The 2019 Hong Kong riots were destroying Hong Kong businesses and spooking investors, it's actually thanks to mainland China that order has since been restored to Hong Kong, so that the businesses can recover, how's that aggression? America has network of rivers but transportation of goods is still slow. Whereas China literally has the world's largest high-speed railway network, more than the rest of the world combined, connecting our cities together and allowing quick commutation and transport of goods. Here's a List of countries by high speed rail length. List of countries by High Speed Rail in 2019 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. France (3,870 km) 4. Germany (3,596 km) 5. Japan (3,422 km) 6. Russia (2,026 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,997 km) 8. Italy (1,697 km) ...
    3
  8533.  @fukushimaisrevelation2817  Because USA and China are the world's two largest economies, and that's why our power consumption is so high. But like I said, China is also the world's largest producers of hydroelectricity and even solar power, which helps reduce our over-reliance on fossil fuels. For example, China's Three Gorges Dam generates clean renewable electricity that is the equivalent of burning 50 million tons of coal per year, which would otherwise emit 100 million tons of carbon dioxide.
    3
  8534. @Jedi Of Math 369 Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of the Great Chinese Famine, caused by bad weather conditions like floods and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. In fact, under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Life expectancy at birth under Mao nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980, and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al. 1984; Coale1984; Jamison 1984; Banister 1987; Ravallion 1997; Banister and Hill 2004). China's infant mortality was halved, and illiteracy rates were halved under Mao. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%. China’s literacy success has been described as “perhaps the single greatest educational effort in human history” (Peterson, 1997). Who are you to ascertain whether the USA won the space race? The Soviet Union invented and launched the world's first artificial satellite, Sputnik-1 and the first man in space was Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin. And who said USA got to the Moon first? The first human-made object to touch the Moon was the Soviet Union's Luna 2, on 13 September 1959, so technically speaking, the Soviets got to the Moon first.
    3
  8535.  @MarkYeung1  China opted for a full boycott in 1980, but here the USA's boycott is only half-assed, such as a diplomatic boycott instead of a full boycott. Worst off, the USA later flipped it's stance and is now sending at least 18 officials to attend the Beijing Olympics. But the rest of the 5 Eyes countries (including Canada, where you are living in) still choose to jump on the Beijing Boycott wagon, and now USA has bailed out and decide to send officials, how are the rest of the 5 Eyes going to explain their boycott to China? The U.S literally took the rest of the 5 Eyes countries for a ride.
    3
  8536.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou I am glad that USA doesn't opt for a full boycott." But have you asked yourself why USA doesn't opt for a full boycott? If U.S truly believes that there are ongoing human rights violations in Xinjiang, yet they still want to send their athletes and their officials (even after previously announcing that they will be diplomatically boycotting the Olympics) then shouldn't it already sound off alarm bells among the 5 Eyes countries (including Canada)?
    3
  8537.  @ewchi-m4n012  Taiwan is an inseparable part of China. If you go and read Taiwan's constitution, it says that that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's nor any formal declaration of independence, then Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    3
  8538.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou Well, the china that isn't the comunist china then," Well, why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (i.e they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers compared to the communists. Yet despite all their initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in ruling the mainland, while cementing the communists' right to rule China. "And that war had formally ended." There's only been a ceasefire but no armistice or peace treaty has ever been signed. So technically the Chinese Civil War (between mainland China and Taiwan island) is still ongoing and unresolved.
    3
  8539.  @ewchi-m4n012  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: Wikipedia: White Terror (Taiwan) But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Source: Wikipedia: Taiwan Miracle Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China. So how is Taiwan doing better than mainland China?
    3
  8540.  @ewchi-m4n012  About payments and loans from China, China is also home to many of the world's largest banks such as China Construction Bank, ICBC, Bank of China, AgBank, Postal Savings Bank of China, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank (China), China Minsheng Bank, Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, China CITIC Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Huaxia Bank, Bank of Beijing, China Guangfa Bank, Bank of Shanghai, Bank of Jiangsu, China Zheshang Bank, and many more. In fact, China has the largest number of banks in the top 100 by total assets. 1. China (19) 2. United States (12) 3. Japan (8) 4. United Kingdom (6) 4. France (6) 4. South Korea (6) 5. Canada (5) 5. Germany (5) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of largest banks But where are the famous banks from Taiwan island as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland? Yet you claim Taiwan is doing better than the mainland?
    3
  8541. @mav Peng Shuai had accused a high ranking communist member of sexual assault (a serious allegation) and the authorities are investigating the situation.
    3
  8542. @Nicolau Poceiro Peng Shuai has appeared through a video call with IOC, and she has expressed her desire for privacy. However, the WTA and the Western MSM are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private affairs for all the world to see, instead of respecting her wish for privacy.
    3
  8543. 太好笑了！
    3
  8544.  @Andrew-ib7gs  You're the guy who resort to ad hominen attacks against people, attacking their Mandarin proficiency, yet when I criticise you spelling Xiangjiang instead of Xinjiang, you called me a troll?
    3
  8545. Their English proficiency is certainly impeccable.
    3
  8546.  Gaylord Manlove  Over 70 years ago, nobody thought China would succeed yet just look at how far China has thrived and defied Western expectations of failure? Previously, China was dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today under the Communist rule, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    3
  8547.  Gaylord Manlove  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    3
  8548. Meanwhile, Canada singlehandedly making enemies with 3 of BRICS countries, by detaining China's Huawei CFO, imposing sanctions on Russia, and now expelling Indian diplomats.
    3
  8549.  @limchyehock6722  It just shows that Scott Morrison only blindly worship power, and seek out the most powerful allies, at the expense of other less powerful allies and no caring about their concerns or offending them.
    3
  8550. Maybe it's because those Canadian banks in the Caribbean still use the U.S Dollar and are thus subject to U.S Dollar hegemony?
    3
  8551. Chinese people don't really care about political correctness, and may expats in China have remarked on this in their videos. Here are some examples: No POLITICAL CORRECTNESS in CHINA! (by serpentza) youtube.com/watch?v=yNNFccVgdiU Chinese People Aren't Politically Correct (by PrimeInChina) youtube.com/watch?v=XeA1vnE3LdE Politically Correct in China? Good luck with that. (by Gweilo60) youtube.com/watch?v=FzIbYG7OfIU
    3
  8552. Paper made from Bamboo trees might be a more environmental friendly alternative. Bamboo is a the largest of the grass family and grows very quickly (in fact, some species are considered invasive) so they make an ideal possible replacement to single-use plastics.
    3
  8553.  @fireturkeyfly11  神州 Shenzhou that’s just the typical attitude of press in a free world. Some free press! Why don't Western news pressure the U.S Military to face consequences for the U.S dronestrike that killed an Afghan family of 10 (including children)? Instead the U.S General just apologize for his mistake and there's no further consequences for his decision?
    3
  8554.  @fireturkeyfly11  Look at Saudi Arabian Crown Prince murdered a journalist (Khashoggi) and Biden Administration is reluctant to hold them accountable. There's seriously a bias reporting in the West, what makes you think it's a free press with selective news reports?
    3
  8555.  @fireturkeyfly11  In China, the Chinese media is regulated by the government, fake news is weeded out and not allowed to spread. Whereas in the United States, the American media is unregulated and fake news can very easily spread among audiences, resulting in what's called "a second pandemic".
    3
  8556. Democracy has long history of failure. For example, Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, and the Republic of Rome failed. Modern Western democracy only has a short history of 100-200 years, and that's not a guarantee that it will succeed in future. But China has 5000 years of history and is among the world oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has survived 5000 years without democracy, so why is there a need to adopt democracy? Not every country has to follow Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of that.
    3
  8557. +Aribeth De'Tylmarande Then what about America, the world's largest economy, but with 99% of Americans complaining that they are not part of the 1%? Taiwan is already regarded by most major countries as part of China under the One-China Policy, so why is there a need to push progress of Taiwan people's vote?
    3
  8558.  @prakorngirodkunkid7877  But I would thought Malaysia and Singapore would know better that the USA doesn't care about their countries as long as they can use them to contain China's rise. I'm surprised that even Singapore's government (well respected for their leadership) has fallen victim to Western anti-Russian MSM.
    3
  8559. Singapore is the only South East Asian country to have slapped sanctions on Russia. The result is Russia blacklisting Singapore as one of its "unfriendly countries". Great job at being neutral, Singapore.
    3
  8560.  @ChillDfect  Is there something wrong with showcasing Shanghai's success under the leadership of the CPC?
    3
  8561.  @MarkYeung1  "The unipolar involvement is not anymore. Finland is of course not alone. Other Eastern European countries such as Poland, Czechoslovakia, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia also broke free from the unipolar Russian/Soviet" During the Cold War it was a bipolar world dominated by two sides, namely that of the US and the USSR. But the world became unipolar after the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1990s. Now Finland joining NATO is contributing to reinforcing the unipolar world, dominated by a single voice, namely that of the US. Whereas countries joining BRICS are reinforcing the multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices.
    3
  8562.  @MarkYeung1  NATO is NOT a defensive alliance. For example, in 1999 NATO bombed a sovereign country Yugoslavia, even though no NATO member was attacked, so how's that defensive in nature?
    3
  8563.  @garyyoung3179  Well then, Ukraine shouldn't have applied to join NATO in the first place and in doing so, giving Russia reason to feel threatened. NATO has been expanding eastwards right up to Russia's doorstep, even though they promised not to. As for Georgia, there's a 2009 EU report indicating that it was Georgia that started the war with Russia.
    3
  8564. Chinese workers make products like smartphones, computers, appliances, sneakers, clothing, etc, at affordable price, so that the cost of living in America is kept low. Think of the millions of dollars Americans saved over the years on living expenses thanks to access to cheaper Chinese goods. A trade war would only negatively impact the economies of both our countries and drive the prices of daily goods up unnecessarily.
    3
  8565. Chinese government and workers built brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan) in Wuhan in 10 days followed by 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan) in 12 days, but China-haters mocked it as "containers." Now USA is setting "tentages" to treat patients.
    3
  8566.  @rais1953  I quoted figures for Chinese imports of Australian wine and lobster for 2020 and 2021, how is that before they were restricted? Even till today, you can find Australian Wine and Australian Western Rock Lobster in China.
    3
  8567.  @andrenogueira5058  The Seventeen Point Agreement was signed by the plenipotentiaries of the Tibetan Government in Lhasa and the plenipotentiaries of the Central People's Government on 23 May 1951, and ratified by the 14th Dalai Lama in the form of a telegram on 24 October 1951. So how is it not legal? Countries all over the world recognize Tibet as part of China, including the U.S, U.K, Australia, Canada, France, Germany, India, Japan, Korea, etc. During UN summits, nobody raises the issue of Tibetan independence then what's your problem?
    3
  8568.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Those tariffs work exactly like sanctions, so they are sanctions." Tarrifs are NOT sanctions (not even close) so why are you trying to conflate tariffs with sanctions? You can still buy Australian wine in China, so China has clearly not sanctioned Australian wine.
    3
  8569. @Top Music 999.99 Lithium in batteries can always be recycled, and as battery technology improves, the amount of lithium required may decrease, or perhaps we'll move onto better Solid State battery tech, which while it could use Lithium, could also use Sodium or Magnesium (which more readily available)
    3
  8570. I support Putin's military operation, but I also understand Russia has also tested their hypersonic Kinzhal (Dagger) on Ukrainian ammunition and fuel depots, with great success.
    3
  8571.  @beastmode8203  I suggest you read the article: The Return of Industrial Warfare by Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) which has found the U.S has significantly scaled down military industrial capacity and cannot afford to go to war.
    3
  8572.  @peanutbar8882  "神州 Shenzhou well, he's a Genocidal dictator!" What genocide are you talking about? Isn't China currently the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people under President Xi Jinping?
    3
  8573. Civil War? Hong Kong does not even have a* military* of its own, it was under British Army protection while as a British colony, and today, it is under the People's Liberation Army's protection. The people of Hong Kong don't even have to serve in the military, and they don't have to spend money on a defense budget at all, so they can concentrate their money on their economy instead.
    3
  8574. +Al Kuffar Malnutrition in China? Why don't you look at India's malnutrition rates first before complaining about China's? Rates of malnutrition among India’s children are almost five times more than in China, and twice those in Sub-Saharan Africa. Nearly half of all India’s children - approximately 60 million - are underweight, about 45% are stunted (too short for their age), 20% are wasted (too thin for their height, indicating acute malnutrition), 75% are anemic, and 57% are Vitamin A deficient. Six states - Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh - account for over half of India’s malnutrition cases. Source: India’s child malnutrition are almost five times more than in China worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2013/05/13/helping-india-combat-persistently-high-rates-of-malnutrition Like I said, why don't you fix your own country's pressing problems first, before complaining about China and Pakistan?
    3
  8575. @Ben Shen Tiananmen Square Massacre was a myth propagated by the British. All verified eyewitnesses present in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, said that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053
    3
  8576. Chinese government imprisoning and jailing people, but still lose out completely to America having world's largest prison population. The incarceration rate so high in America, that US prisons are packed and overwhelmed, so some prisoners are being released onto the streets to ease the overcrowded situation. List of countries by incarceration rate en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate
    3
  8577.  @fireturkeyfly11  City wide lockdown prevents the spread to other cities, isn't that a good thing since it saves lives?
    3
  8578.  Mixed Nats  Anti-China sentiment is growing in Canada, because the whole "Yellow Peril" mindset never died out. Since 19th century, Westerners have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-liberal democratic country like China eventually surpassing the West someday in the future, is simply too frightening for Westerners to fathom.
    3
  8579.  Lily Qresmaidapa Sungkono  China doesn't want war, but that doesn't mean China is weak. But if America continue to "demonise" our country and paint China as the enemy, then don't be surprised one day when Chinese start treating Americans like one.
    3
  8580.  Lily Qresmaidapa Sungkono  China welcome Americans warmly as visitors to our lands (just ask expats in China) but sadly, many Americans treat Chinese in America as "enemies".
    3
  8581.  Rudolf Adler te envita  You are entitled to your own opinion about race as am I. No race is absolutely perfect, but I've noticed that many Western men often find Asian women attractive, because they retain traditional notions of feminine beauty. Generally, Asian women (like Chinese, Japanese and Koreans) put effort into their appearance, they exercise regularly and diet to maintain their slim figures as attractive to the opposite sex, they apply facial creams to protect their skin, and so on. Whereas in the West, feminism is encouraging Western women to act as unfeminine as possible. Beautiful, slim Western girls are being encouraged to dominate their men in relationships, to rebel against authority, to eat whatever they want, to get tattoos and piercings, to grow fat and unattractive, and yet the Western media will tell these women that men will find them attractive. Some men do, but obviously not everyone and if a man finds a woman ugly, he is often blamed as being "shallow" and that the woman does not deserve him. That's one possible reason why some Western men are simply fed up with the state of feminism in the West, telling them what to find attractive. Many often turn to Asia and seeking out Asian partners because they retain traditional feminine virtues. Because Western feminism is destroying their own feminine virtues.
    3
  8582.  Rudolf Adler te envita  I do agree that Germanic have some good genes and traits (that's why Hitler supported an Aryan Race) but unlike Hitler, it is actually the Jews that were the intelligent ones. Generally speaking, Jews were cunning, thrifty, good with money, had a good head for business, and placed importance on family and education, thus, they share many similar traits with Asians in this regard. As a hormone, testosterone has both good and bad things about it. During wartime, it motivates soldiers to kill the enemy and results in increase physical performance, but during peacetime, it may result in increased aggressiveness and so on.
    3
  8583. Julian Assange fought to expose the bad deeds of criminals. And the West treated him like a criminal for exposing criminals.
    3
  8584. Towards the end of the video, at 17:35 did you just refer to Taiwan as a country when you said: "Independence makes no sense for Taiwan, it would destroy the country?" Even at 20:15 you said: "if they just cut economic ties with Taiwan, the country will gut itself"? Or is it because you assumed that in those scenarios, Taiwan is a separate country?
    3
  8585.  @breyna7917  What makes you think the government doesn't care about the people? The Chinese government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and halt production, closing tourist attractions, imposing lockdown, banning mass gatherings, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and contain the virus. Now it's finally paying off that the virus is under control in China and we are cautiously reopening our economy. Video: Let Wuhan's sacrifice not be in vain youtu.be/YH6JjdANIPY But in Western countries like US and UK, their economies are far too precious to sacrifice so human health has to be sacrificed instead. Donald Trump wants to reopen the economy and Boris Johnson is relying on "herd immunity" to the pull through. So human lives have to be sacrificed instead of the economy.
    3
  8586. +Holy Spirit China carried out the first flight-tests of a new kind of ballistic missile with a hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV) the DF-17. The DF-17 is the first hypersonic glide vehicle-equipped missile intended for operational deployment ever tested. Source:Introducing the DF-17 thediplomat.com/2017/12/introducing-the-df-17-chinas-newly-tested-ballistic-missile-armed-with-a-hypersonic-glide-vehicle/ In the meantime, you can always wait another 60 million years later for another meteor to hit the Earth, like the one that wiped out the dinosaurs during the end of the Cretaceous period.
    3
  8587.  @cchannel7857  Cyrus has stated in his email that he's been very busy lately. It's not uncommon among business practices for payment details to be worked out at a later date after the initial business proposal, so what exactly are you trying to say? The end goal is that Cyrus declined payment in the end.
    3
  8588.  @johny19851  serpentza has a history of lying to their audience, like for example when serpentza and c-milk claimed that the Dune movie posters in China excluded black actress Sharon Ducan-Brewster. But this has been debunked and Dune movie posters in China do feature Sharon, so is serpentza really a reliable source of information about China?
    3
  8589.  @abbotsful  Here's the Dune movie poster in China not featuring black actress Sharon Duncan Brewster being debunked youtube.com/watch?v=zu6WJBVMgHM
    3
  8590.  @abbotsful  "神州 Shenzhou better example please" Then there was that time that serpentza and c-milk digitally edited Uighur Tiktok videos to include emojis (that weren't there originally) as some sort of "secret code"
    3
  8591.  @Yellow1964  Hybrid system, that's why I said "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics." According to the theory, China is in the primary stage of Socialism, due to our relatively low level of material wealth and needed to engage in economic growth before pursuing a more egalitarian form of socialism, which in turn would lead to a communist society described in Marxist orthodoxy.
    3
  8592.  @redfieldchris1217  "Shenzhen is the first place in China this week to forbid eating cats and dog meat." It's legal to eat cats and dogs in 44 states in the United States and yes, it has happen before. Source: Prime Cuts of Dog or Cat Meat - Legal in 44 U.S. States! helpshelterpets.com/the-hot-dig-kitty-dog-blog/27-good-tidbits-of-information-for-pet-owners/326-prime-cuts-of-dog-or-cat-meat-legal-in-44-us-states.html Source: It’s Still Legal To Eat Dogs In The United States–And Yes, It Happens dogtime.com/advocacy/49933-still-legal-eat-dogs-united-states-yes-happens
    3
  8593.  @redfieldchris1217  China is not ungrateful for receiving medical aid from other countries, in fact China has made numerous donations of our own to other countries affected by the coronavirus. Source: Chinese billionaire Jack Ma says he will donate one 1,000,000 face masks and 500,000 coronavirus testing kits to the US cnn.com/2020/03/14/tech/jack-ma-face-masks-us-donation/index.html Source: Bank of China donates 500,000 face masks to Philippines to help fight COVID-19 spread china.org.cn/world/Off_the_Wire/2020-03/29/content_75874282.htm Source: Xiaomi donates masks to Italy in hour of need chinadaily.com.cn/a/202003/10/WS5e673eb0a31012821727dddd.html
    3
  8594.  @redfieldchris1217  "I have never heard of positive videos on China are demonetized." Check out Nathan Rich demonetized channel with ❌ sign. Or Barrett (father and son) channel getting demonetised. Or Gweilo 60 having his subscribers automatically unsubscribed from his channel.
    3
  8595.  @mrkaizagaming2652  What Chinese overlordship? China does not intend to conquer the Philippines, but as I've shown the South China Sea is not part of Philippines territory as per the 1898 Treaty of Paris, so why is Philippines claiming Chinese territory as their own?
    3
  8596.  @axisense8651  Greediness? I provide arguments to support China's side, yet you just dismiss them while coming up with nothing substantial of your own.
    3
  8597.  @fars7346  Republic of China (now Taiwan) first drew up the 11 Dash Line in 1947. Even the USA acknowledged the 11 Dash Line, and the Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence in 1946 that the Spratlys was not Philippine territory, both to not anger Chiang Kai-shek in China and because the Spratlys were not part of the Philippines per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America.
    3
  8598. Agreed. The most that people can do is try to minimise transmission as much as possible, in order to reduce the likelihood of newer, deadlier variants emerging.
    3
  8599.  @blackwingz0910  So as a Filipino, you support Taiwan's claim over the South China Sea? The Republic of China 🇹🇼 (Taiwan) published the 11 Dash Line covering a wider swathe of the South China Sea than mainland China's 9 Dash Line, Yet you support this?
    3
  8600. Most of the world recognize Taiwan as part of China, under the One-China Policy.
    3
  8601. mentalworkout But it doesn't change the fact that most countries in the world, including USA, UK, France, Russia, Germany, Canada, etc, recognise Taiwan as part of China. The United Nations even kicked ROC (Taiwan) out of the UN security council and acknowledged PRC (China) as China's successor.
    3
  8602. +misty bonnie How was the KMT weak? After the Japanese surrender in 1945, the KMT still had a strength of 4,300,000 (June 1946) outnumbering the communists, who had a strength of 1,200,000 (July 1945) of by more than 3 times! Yet the KMT lost the mainland to poorly trained, ill-equipped, heavily outnumbered communists peasants? This demonstrates gross incompetence on part of KMT's right to rule the mainland
    3
  8603. +Christopher Sean The Communists had much smaller forces than the KMT or the Japanese, so Mao Zedong resorted to tactics suitable for a smaller force to fight against a larger opponent, such as guerilla warfare. Why would the communists send their small entire force to fight the Japanese directly? That would be suicide for the communists! And once again, it was Soviet Union that cause Japan to surrender, not the KMT.
    3
  8604. +Kianglek Tan said "The CCP now is not like it used to be, it's rubbish now" The Chinese Communist Party started off with a only just 50 members at the beginning of 1921 and grew to nearly 4.5 million when the People's Republic of China was founded in 1949. Today, the CCP is among the world's largest political party, with over 89 million members (which is about the population size of Germany) Being a CCP member is not easy, you'll have to be among the top 5% in your field of specialization. About 20.27 million (23.8%) of CCP are women and 5.80 million (6.8%) are from ethnic minority groups. In terms of occupation, farmers, herders and fishers totaling 25.35 million is the largest group, while 7.25 million Party members are industrial workers. Another 7.16 million members work in Party and state agencies, and 20.20 million are managerial staff and professional technicians working in enterprises and nonprofit organizations. Students make up 2.91 million and more than a quarter of members are 35 years or younger and about 34.09 million have obtained degrees in higher education institutions. All of them are highly qualified members of their respective fields and they are a politically savvy to make important decisions regarding the country's future whenever the CCP votes. But you look at democracies like USA and not every American is politically savvy enough to make the right vote, yet USA still allow them to vote? You are deciding the course of a country of 300 million (1.4 billion for China) so why entrust such important decisions to people are aren't politically savvy enough? All in all, I think the CCP has proven itself to be extremely competent, having survived the Japanese invasion and numerous KMT attempts to purge them, overthrowing the KMT and growing from a mere 50 members to about 89,450,000 members today.
    3
  8605. One reason for the US-China trade deficit is the difference of spending culture. Chinese culture encourages being frugal and saving money up for a rainy day, whereas American culture is about consumerism, over consumption, and buying more stuff than they actually need, that's one reason why the US-China trade deficit was created.
    3
  8606. @The button man “Improving”的中文是“进步”。 句子是“你的中文进步。”
    3
  8607.  Charles Schmid  It was during Chinese Civil War, of course Chinese were killing Chinese. Just like during American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans. Or Vietnamese killing Vietnamese during Vietnam War. Or Koreans during Korean War or any civil war for that matter. China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, so why are accusing me of being a war monger?
    3
  8608.  @bbj7383  Mainland China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    3
  8609.  @bbj7383  What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    3
  8610.  @stadinh  Yeah, it's a joke that US has done little, while China has narrow the gap between them in fields they are behind, while also widening the gap in fields in which China is ahead.
    3
  8611.  @abreathoffreshair1  You said: "(A proper one, not like the fake one in China where 99.9% of trials result in convictions because the courts just do what the CCP says.)" Taiwan's conviction rate for those that go to trial is more than 90 percent, according to statistics released by the Ministry of Justice, so what's the difference between the conviction rate of mainland China and Taiwan? Japan's conviction rate is 99.3 percent, are you also saying Japan's legal system is fake as well?
    3
  8612. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    3
  8613. Even the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    3
  8614.  @themc.kennyshow6585  The mighty U.S Army lost the Vietnam War against starving Vietnamese communist peasants and had too pull out of Saigon. The U.S Army also lost the nearly 20-year Afghan War against Taliban goat-herders and had to pull out of Kabul, so all the battle experience doesn't necessarily mean that the U.S Army will win the war.
    3
  8615.  @bartonlee3594  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country, where the previous Kuomintang administration failed to do so during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1917-1949) for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established the ROC, China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but the West laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. The West even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realizing a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and he reunified China under communism, proclaiming the founding of the PRC in 1949. Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951 and if not for Chairman Mao, China today would most likely still be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    3
  8616.  @bartonlee3594  China has many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc, to map out China's direction and future in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the years to come. Whereas in the United States for example, the U.S President has to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short-term plans, instead of long-term plans, spanning say 10 years or more for America.
    3
  8617.  @bartonlee3594  The funny thing is that the former German Chancellor Merkel served 4 terms (16 years) and would have probably been elected into a 5th term if she didn't voluntarily withdrew from the next German election. Whereas President Xi served 2 terms (8 years) and is entering his 3rd term.
    3
  8618.  @junebug8485  Read the World Economic Forum article again, its about which countries are on the right track, according to their citizens, not about disliking which government party. The WEF survey shows that China is bucking the trend with 90% of people expressing confidence in their country’s direction, as compared to the 65% of Americans that think their country is on the wrong track. Also, claiming that they disagree with Donald Trump and the Republicans or Joe Biden and the Democrats, doesn't this reinforce the view that neither of the two parties are able to deliver what the ordinary Americans want? The truth is that the two parties answer to the 1%, not to the 99% of Americans, making the U.S a plutocracy rather than a democracy. Whereas in China, even though there's only one type of government and one type of party, if the government is able to deliver what the Chinese want, then isn't China more democratic than the U.S in this sense? You said: "opinions and different viewpoints are what forges a democracy." Again, that's only one definition of a democracy, there are multiple definitions, and if we go by the standard that democracy is a government of the people, by the people, for the people, then the U.S is not a democracy, it's a plutocracy with a government of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%. For example, if you have to have lots of $$$ if you want to become POTUS, that's why only rich people can become POTUS. Also, censorship does exist in the U.S as people with different views are having their voices silenced by social media websites, so it appears that even by your own definition, the U.S isn't a democracy. Even on YT, different viewpoints (like Russian media RT) is banned, so doesn't this take away from the West being open to different viewpoints?
    3
  8619.  @bartonlee3594  Having a long-term leader actually builds up valuable political experience. President Xi for example, has around 30-40 years of political experience under his belt and that's why many Chinese believe his is competent enough to lead our country of 1.4 billion people (certainly no easy feat). Whereas in the U.S for example, there are leaders who lacked political experience (i.e Donald Trump) and yet he was able to get into power in the U.S. In fact, many are dreading his possible return to power in the next election in 2024.
    3
  8620.  @chronicmasturbator2749  Westerners boil lobsters alive! Video: Graphic: Screaming Lobsters, Boiled and Burned Alive (How To Cook Prepare Live Lobster) youtu.be/UKiiFrfJj-s If you regard all living things as equal and sacred, then who are people to judge others based on different food preferences and methods of preparation?
    3
  8621.  @SenorJuan2023  The opposition still exists in Russia and Putin even announced his candidacy for the 2024 president election in Russia.
    3
  8622.  @simunlimun6838  The survey on China was conducted by Harvard University, whereas the survey for Russia was conducted by the non-government organization Levada Center. Are you saying that these aren't reputable when it comes to surveying people?
    3
  8623. USA funded $400 million to the World Health Organization, China only funded $40 million, yet Trump says WHO is China centric?
    3
  8624.  @sarahlee9979  Agreed. In the U.S, the Republicans and the Democrats seem more interested in fighting among themselves, rather than fight for America's future. Each side sabotages the plans made by the other side, and they blame the other side for America's problems and take no responsibility for them. Whereas in China, the Communist Party gets the credit for the successes as well as bear the brunt for mistakes, because there is only one party after all. The interesting thing is that the CPC learns lessons from previous mistakes, whereas the Republicans and Democrats aren't willing to learn.
    3
  8625.  @johanhirte9661  The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet.
    3
  8626. China is rapidly advancing in various scientific fields. China is home to world's fastest supercomputer, the Sunway Taihu Light 神威·太湖之光 and during 2017 Top 500 supercomputer survey, China beat the USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA having 144 out of 500. Source: China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/
    3
  8627. Why are you accusing me of being from 50c army? When did I ever mentioned the Communist party of China here at all or defended them?
    3
  8628. @ForrestSCS China is so strong, that America wants to divide China by bringing up Hong Kong, Xinjiang and Taiwan issues.
    3
  8629. Many in Singapore still suffer from the "colonial mentality". Even though Singapore has been physically decolonized, the "decolonization of the mind" needs to happen in order to reverse the mental conditioning inflicted by the colonizers on the minds of the colonized. Only then can the people truly be free.
    3
  8630. K S When did I ever said that I hate men? All I did was point out that working a job, generally means you have less time to spend on your kids, which is logical, yet you accuse me of taking drugs for coming up with this logic? I never said anything about single parent families not being allowed to work so why are you bringing up such things?
    3
  8631.  @yvieanaysha5384  The population of Uighurs in China actually nearly quadrupled in size from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. This is because Uighurs aren't subject to the One-Child policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953–2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 ... Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    3
  8632.  k20  China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19. They had 3 months to react, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China bought the West time. The West Squandered It nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    3
  8633.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou so you agree that Dr. Sun is a traitor because he tried to overthrow the legitimate Chinese government." Did I ever said that? I never even mentioned anything about Dr. Sun here at all, so why are you seemingly putting words in my mouth and making assumptions from words I never actually said? If anything, all I mentioned was that the Nationalist KMT leader, Chiang kai--shek (aka Jiang Jieshi) ruled Taiwan with an iron fist and Taiwan was under martial law for 38 years which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. During that period, the government of Taiwan use National Security Laws to get rid of dissidents and political opponents. But did I mention anything about Dr. Sun? Then why are you seemingly putting words into my mouth?
    3
  8634.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou CGTN is Chinese state own propaganda newspapers. UK is right to stop the operation in UK." So you admit that even in a Western Democracy like the United Kingdom use their National Security Law to revoke the broadcasting license of media such as CGTN, then this shows that even Western democracies have National Security Law. The United States revoked China Telcom's license on national security concerns on 26th Oct 2021. If you support the UK revoking CGTN broadcasting license in Britain, then can't Beijing do the same for Hong Kong? When Britain returned Hong Kong back to China in 1997, they co-wrote Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 (香港基本法第二十三條) that Hong Kong shall enact laws to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government, and that's what the National Security Law is all about, and Beijing didn't violate Hong Kong Basic Law by implementing a National Security Law.
    3
  8635. ​ @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Biden didn't use the National Security to close newspapers. Only Chinese governments (imperial or authoritative) do." No, I just cited an earlier example of the United Kingdom revoking CGTN broadcasting license in the Britain (and you acknowledged it) so why do you only seem to think "Only Chinese governments (imperial or authoritative) do." ?
    3
  8636.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Unlike CGTN and China Telecom, Hong Kong Free Press is not own by the states." What is this "Hong Kong Free Press" that you're referring to? Jimmy Lai, the CEO of Apple Daily newspaper, was found guilty and sentence to jail for secession, subversion and colluding with foreign powers in such attempts. If you support UK revoking CGTN broadcasting license in Britain, then can't Beijing do the same for Apple Daily in Hong Kong?
    3
  8637. If the leader himself has shown to be quite capable, then what's wrong with leaving him in power in order to maximise the benefits to China? Chinese government has made 5-year plans, 10-year plans and 20-year plans to map out China's future and set specific goals for 2020, 2030, 2050, etc, so having capable leadership at the helm is beneficial. Western governments on the other hand, only plan for short term (4-8 years for USA for example) because that is the maximum term presidents can serve, so political parties don't make long term plans spanning 10-20 years, because its not guaranteed that they will be in power again.
    3
  8638.  @maicholaa7482  China is home to two of top five world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) and Tianhe-2 (天河-2) and in 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Video: Sunway TaihuLight named world's fastest supercomputer youtu.be/KEdsrT1mFAU
    3
  8639.  @DS87  Singapore also slapped sanctions on Russia (the only ASEAN country to have done so) and thus, Russia has placed Singapore on a list of unfriendly countries.
    3
  8640. Peng Shuai is trying to lay low and avoid the public eye for a while until this all blows over, and she has expressed her desire for personal privacy during a video call with IOC. But the WTA is trying to pry into her personal affairs and demanding she appear in public and bare her private life for all the world to see.
    3
  8641.  @krk7922  You said: "They are free chinese and don't answer to the ccp," If that's the case, then why is it atheletes from Taiwan island can only compete in the Olympics under the name "Chinese Taipei"? Why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (taxed from peasants), they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan (of which they considered China themselves)? If anything, it demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China.
    3
  8642.  @neil6958  I watched China in Focus channel and it's always negative about China. Then I check it's part of the Epoch Media Group, literally Falun Dafa media, yet you still believe their videos?
    3
  8643.  @neil6958  I'm saying that many areas of China have "nail houses" 钉子户 where the homeowner refuse to sell their crumbling, decrepit houses and the Chinese government leaves them alone, developing the surrounding area. Source: China's nail houses: the homeowners who refuse to make way – in pictures https://www.theguardian.com/cities/gallery/2014/apr/15/china-nail-houses-in-pictures-property-development
    3
  8644.  Supreme  You said: "Your a troll" So you begin your post with an insult against me? Just because my views happen to differ from yours? How immature. "神州 Shenzhou why are so capitalist then if they suppose to be communist." Deng Xiaoping's theory of "Socialism with Chinese Character" stipulates that China was in the primary stage of socialism due to its relatively low level of material wealth and needed to engage in economic growth before pursuing a more egalitarian form of socialism, with the end goal being communism (as described in Marxist Orthodoxy.
    3
  8645.  Supreme  You said: "Why rename themselves the facist party of China to reflect the reality on the ground." Fascism is racial supremacy, like back when Hitler demonized the Jews as an inferior race during Nazi Germany. If China was truly behaving like the Nazis, we should be seeing similar demonization of ethnic minorities. Yet ethnic minorities in China aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Ethnic minorities in China enjoy special privileges from the government, tax exemptions, free education up to 15 years, priority in healthcare, government bursaries and education admission advantages. For example, if Han student needs 600 points to qualify for a certain university course, then an ethnic minority student needs only 300 points (easier to qualify) for the exact same course. This is the complete opposite behavior of Nazi Germany, where Jews were demonized even in the Nazi media. But if you tune in to CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV, they promote ethnic minority cultures, festivals, dances, traditional instruments, traditional food, traditional clothing, etc, which is the exact opposite of what the Nazis did to represent the Jews.
    3
  8646.  Supreme  Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    3
  8647.  Supreme  You said: "the racism didn't happen until nazi popped up and combined the two" So you're saying that Germany was fascist before the Nazis took over? The growing nationalism in China is in response to Western MSM constantly painting negative image of China and demonising our country, and China needs to push back against this anti-China propaganda. Also, isn't Nationalism is the glue that holds a country's citizens together?
    3
  8648.  Supreme  "神州 Shenzhou then why fulcon practitioners being targeted and Muslims too" Falun Dafa (法轮大法) was founded in 1992 by a man called Li Hongzhi, by hijacking existing practices from Buddhism, Taoism, and traditional Chinese Qigong practices. This should already sound off alarm bells that 法轮大法 is actually a cult in disguise.
    3
  8649.  Supreme   About Religion in China, China has nearly 200 million religious believers and more than 380,000 clerical personnel. The five major religions practiced in China are Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism, and Protestantism. China has over 20 million Muslims, more than 57,000 clerical personnel. There are around 222,000 Buddhist clerical personnel and over 40,000 Taoist clerical personnel. Catholicism and Protestantism have 6 million and 38 million followers in China, respectively, with 8,000 and 57,000 clerical personnel. There are approximately 5,500 religious groups in China, including seven national organizations which are Buddhist Association of China, Chinese Taoist Association, China Islamic Association, Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association, Bishops’ Conference of Catholic Church in China, National Committee of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement of the Protestant Churches in China, and China Christian Council. At present, there are about 144,000 places of worship registered for religious activities in China, among which are 33,500 Buddhist temples (including 28,000 Han Buddhist temples, 3,800 Tibetan Buddhist lamaseries, and 1,700 Theravada Buddhist temples), 9,000 Taoist temples, 35,000 Islamic mosques, 6,000 Catholic churches and places of assembly spread across 98 dioceses, and 60,000 Protestant churches and places of assembly. Source：nation.com.pk/03-Apr-2018/china-has-over-20-million-muslims-35-000-mosques
    3
  8650.  Supreme  "神州 Shenzhou your views are straight delusional and seem like you are pro ccp almost blindly and to the point you ignore valid criticism." Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. Under Chairman Mao Zedong, China's population grew from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. China's growth in life expectancy at birth from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al. 1984; Coale1984; Jamison 1984; Banister 1987; Ravallion 1997; Banister and Hill 2004). This graph shows life-expectencies at birth across China, USA and India. Source: data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    3
  8651.  Supreme  "神州 Shenzhou well extreme nationalism is a hawk mark of fascism." Look at the nationalism in the USA today, the Americans have many patriotic slogans like "America First!", "Make America Great Again!" and "God Bless the United States!" then are you also saying that the USA is fascist?
    3
  8652.  @johnsmith1953x  Do you have the money then?
    3
  8653.  @Andy-P  Then what makes you sure it's a great relief to them?
    3
  8654.  @Andy-P  "Westerners can see all that." Have those Westerners actually been to China and talked to the youth here? Then what makes you claim they can see all that?
    3
  8655.  @creatorofgods1668  "神州 Shenzhou You can’t compare to the benefits prison inmates receive here in the U.S" In my opinion, prison life is NOT supposed to be fun! It's suppose to be a punishment for breaking the law; a deterrent that makes potential criminals think twice before committing crimes. If you make prison life so "tolerable" then once these ex-convicts return to society, many (but not all) will find it easier to return to a life of crime and wound up behind bars again. Because to them, life in prison is better than outside. Furthermore, there's this stigma about hiring ex-convicts in many societies.
    3
  8656.  Cipher Crypto  In 2013, China landed our very own lunar spacecraft and lunar rover (Chang'e 3 嫦娥-3 and Yutu 玉兔 "Jade Rabbit") on the Moon, making China the world's 3rd nation to make a soft-landing on Earth's celestial neighbor. Source: China Lands On The Moon space.com/23968-china-moon-rover-historic-lunar-landing.html In October 2015, the Jade Rabbit set the record for the longest operational period for a rover on the Moon. The rover's ground penetrating radar found evidence of at least 9 distinct rock layers. Video: China moon landing video: 'Jade Rabbit' rover soft-lands on lunar surface youtube.com/watch?v=XpAwmVPT758 Through this, China is showing that Chinese people are capable of achieving equally impressive feats as Westerners in space.
    3
  8657. What if one day in the future, the whole world runs out of petrol to fuel your car?
    3
  8658. Agreed. Cyrus Janssen claimed that what Putin did was wrong, but what other option is there? Even John Mearsheimer was posed this question on what else Putin should have done, and Prof Mearsheimer could not come up with an alternative solution.
    3
  8659.  @yongdeng1813  Agreed. I find it baffling that on one had, Cyrus Janssen was able to see past what the media says about China, but when it comes to Russia, Cyrus just believe what they say about Putin.
    3
  8660.  @zeusvalentine1848  China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    3
  8661.  @MarkYeung1  Look at the events of the 2008 Tibetan Unrest. Suddenly those so-called "Tibetan monks and nuns" just attacked random Han passers-by for no reason, and the authorities were shocked of the level of violence exhibited by monks and nuns. And it was during the sensitive 2008 Beijing Olympics period, where there were many reporters and journalists in China, leading the authorities to suspect foreign involvement. And the fact that it occurred in Lhasa, Gansu, Qinghai, Sichuan, lead to authorities to suspect it was a planned attack.
    3
  8662.  @MarkYeung1  The so-called "monks" threw stones at Han people, broke into Han shops, looted them, setting fire to buildings, including government buildings and schools, and burned them to the ground. The 2008 Tibetan Unrest situation looked remarkably similar to the 2019 Hong Kong riots a couple of years ago. It's all too well-organised to be a random mob, given that it happened simultaneously across Lhasa, Qinghai, Gansu, etc at the same time during the sensitive time of the 2008 Beijing Olympics.
    3
  8663.  @TAL142  Yes. It has been shown that the 14th Dalai Lama was a CIA agent and colluded with the CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against Beijing, it stands to reason that the CIA could be behind the 2008 Tibetan Unrest, given the sensitive timing of the Beijing Olympics and the fact that the riots appeared out of seemingly nowhere.
    3
  8664. Agreed. In China, the Chinese government controls the companies for China's benefit, reining them in when they gone too far. Whereas in the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    3
  8665.  @marily6654  Trump's tariffs won't last forever. Even President Trump will have to step down from being president one day. When that happens, what if the next US Presidents decides to reverse Trump's policies and lift the US-China trade war tariffs? This could possibly result in a future economic boom for China, and US-China trade relations resume their previous pre trade war levels. Who knows?
    3
  8666. こんにちは、もう食べましたか？
    3
  8667.  @zackk4969  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"? Video: Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' youtu.be/DPt-zXn05ac
    3
  8668.  @zackk4969  “Diary of a Madman”.《狂人日记》 is a work of fiction by Lu Xun, then why are you confusing fiction with reality?
    3
  8669.  @myspace1876  "Merkel went through a process of election every 5 years. That process has been scrapped by xi and now you are under the rule of an autocrat." Who says that has been scrapped? President Xi Jinping became won his 2018 re-election and his next election is in 2023, so how has President Xi scrapped this process?
    3
  8670.  @XinnieThePoo  How did President Xi release the Covid-19? The coronavirus wasn't even known to science at that time. China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain out of billions of strains in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. So how is President Xi evil?
    3
  8671.  @violatedmonkey  Where did China threatened other countries with nuclear attacks? The United States is literally the only country in history to have drop nuclear bombs on other countries.
    3
  8672.  @petehagen8638  You have repeatedly compared China with Nazi Germany. The Nazis promoted racial supremacy, considered Jews as an inferior race and Nazi propaganda is littered with demonized caricatures of Jews depicting their inferior status in Nazi society. So if China was truly behaving like Nazi Germany back, then we should be seeing demonization of the ethnic minorities in Chinese media. But I watched CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV, and they actually promote ethnic minority cultures, cuisine, festivals, traditional clothing, traditional instruments, song and dance. If anything, China is doing the opposite of what Nazi Germany did with antisemitism and China is actually promoting ethnic minority culture instead of demonizing it like what Hitler did with the Jews.
    3
  8673.  @kenlee1416  Agreed with your point. Nowadays it's mostly Russia that's in the West's sights, but if Russia somehow falls, China will be the next target by the West. If China somehow falls, then India will be the next target by the West.
    3
  8674.  Scott Mayfield  If China's strategy works, then its the U.S's own loss here, if China can drive out the other competition through subsidies (which are alleged btw).
    3
  8675.  @roumorzo7269  I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion:Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    3
  8676.  @ernahubbard2062  You said: "Third, legitimate laws? You mean the laws initiated by the Party and passed by the rubber stamp?" In your country, who sets the laws if not your government? Since the Communist Party of China is the government of China then why can't the party initiate laws and have them passed? And what rubber stamp are you talking about?
    3
  8677.  @angxiang3186  If Singapore is never any nation's vassal, then why is Singapore the only South East Asian country to have slapped sanctions on Russia? There's no benefit to such a move, instead it earned Singapore a place on Russia's list of "unfriendly countries" that's all.
    3
  8678.  @angxiang3186  Even Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines, and the other South East Asian countries didn't slap sanctions on Russia, unlike Singapore. Isn't Singapore playing right into the U.S hands by sanctioning Russia?
    3
  8679.  @Tespri  "Shenzhou. how can you say that Dhina is alive when only thing left of it is holidays?" Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself? China is home to the largest population on the planet, yet you think China isn't alive? From historical monuments to cultural festivals, to delicious Chinese cuisine and so on, yet you claim "whatever remnants of Chinese culture is destroyed",? Take Chinese characters for example and Chinese characters have a documented history spanning more than three millennia, representing one of the four independent inventions of writing universally accepted by scholars. Of these four, Chinese characters comprise the only writing system in continuous use since its invention.
    3
  8680. As far as I know, the oldest "gear" or "cogwheel" in the world date from the 4th century BC in China (Zhan Guo times - Late East Zhou dynasty), which have been preserved at the Luoyang Museum of Henan Province, China. Source: Wikipedia: Gear
    3
  8681. China plans to connect the entire world with railway lines, from Africa to Middle East to Europe and even to the Americas through an underground line in the narrow Bering Strait. Map of World Land Bridge: http://schillerinstitute.org/strategic/2016/0825-sandmark-yemen/world_land-bridge-map.jpg
    3
  8682.  @HannarrMontannarr  Every country copies technology from one another. Where'd you think Taiwan got their high end technology then? Even the USA copied German technology and stole German patents after WWII. At the beginning of WWII, American tanks were largely inferior to German tanks, but after WWII Nazi Surrender, the Americans absorbed German Panzer (Tank) Technology and that's why American tanks are so powerful today. The Nazi Airforce (Luftwaffe) had such successful aircraft designs that America incorporated those designs into its Airforce. Even Nazi V2 Rocket Scientists were put to work by NASA on their Moon landing missions. Source: One of the greatest ripoffs of all time was the US theft of German patents after WWII wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/patents.html Like I said, the PRC was NOT a member of the UN during the time of the Korean War in 1950s, and PRC only became a member of UN in 1970s, so why did you wrote "Lets not forge that china attack UN forces in korea, an organisation that it was a member of,"? You already got your historical facts about Korean War all mixed up in your statement here. According to journalist Fyodor Tertitskiy, documentation from 1945 suggests the Soviet government had no plans for a permanent division of Korea, and a Soviet-US Joint Commission met in 1946 and 1947 to work towards a unified administration. In 1946, the Soviet Union proposed Lyuh Woon-hyung as the leader of a unified Korea, but this was rejected by the US. At the final meeting of the Joint Commission in September 1947, Soviet delegate Terentii Shtykov proposed that both Soviet and US troops withdraw and give the Korean people the opportunity to form their own government. This was again rejected by the US. So isn't the USA that seemingly refused to allow Korea to unify by themselves? Isn't it the USA that rejected the idea that both Soviet and US forces withdraw and give the Korean people the opportunity to form their own government?
    3
  8683.  @yeungnanami9100  Exactly. By stirring up trouble elsewhere, those people become refugees and flee their homeland, and many of them end up as low-wage workers in Western countries (much to the disgruntlement of some Westerners). Even a highly paid, highly sought after engineer in Taiwan can become reduced to a refugee desperate to work for lower pay in the U.S, and this is how the U.S profits from conflict.
    3
  8684.  @bungkusi2432  The ironic thing is that Christianity originated in the Middle East, and it's quite possible that Jesus Christ himself was of the skin tone of people living in the Jerusalem, and not the Anglicized version of his portrait often depicted in the West.
    3
  8685. 5:03 Turns out that it's Canada that owns the most farmland in America, not China.
    3
  8686.  @mikef6399  Many Indians (but not all) still suffer from the "colonial mentality" that plagues the people of former colonies. Even though the British have physically decolonized from India, the "decolonization of the mind" still needs to take place. Only when India is both physically and mentally decolonized, can India finally be free of the trappings of colonialism.
    3
  8687. +Yumeha Minakami Where is evidence of Greek and Middle Eastern invention of crossbow? You claiming I am not reading your comment, then tell me when did I ever said Chinese invented the bow? The earliest bronze crossbow triggers were found in Chinese tombs, like in the Terracotta Army. There isn't any archaeological evidence of Polybolos, apart from writings that's all. On the other hand, archaeological evidence of the earliest repeating crossbow from Tomb 47 at Qinjiazui, Hubei Province has been dated to the 4th century BC, during the Spring and Autumn period. Where is your archaeological proof for your claims? You are downright lying about mail armor offering protection from arrows and crossbow bolts. Just search videos about "Mail Armor versus arrows/crossbows" on Youtube to see what I mean. So many modern tests been conducted on mail armor using medieval bows and crossbows, yet you still claim mail can withstand a high powered bolt from crossbow? Which part of my statement that ancient Chinese people invented pig iron (256 BC) or cast iron (5th century BC) or wrought iron (2nd century BC) or blast furnace (1st century AD) or cupola furnace (4th century BC) or other things I mentioned is wrong? What about the Puddling process invented in 1st century AD? If you found anything wrong with my above statements, then why don't you point it out instead of mocking me? I thought we are talking about seafaring inventions here, not how well the country's sailors were. I have already named some Chinese seafaring inventions, like the compass (206 BC), and the rudder (1st century AD) etc. One of famous Chinese warship battles was Battle of Red Cliffs (same as the movie) where Liu Bei and Sun Quan fought Cao Cao. This battle has been cited as a candidate for one of the largest naval battles in history according to the following source. Wikipedia: Largest Naval Battles in History en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Largest_naval_battle_in_history You don't know much about Chinese history, but presume to look down on our naval capabilities? During Han dynasty, China had tower ships called Louchuan (楼船) which were floating fortresses armed with siege weapons including traction trebuchets. Paper still proved more popular than Egyptian papyrus, which was why it was eventually replaced. Paper was cheaper, easier to make, and revolutionized the recording and transmission of information. Han Chinese even invented the paper banknote, to help make business transactions more efficient, instead of carrying around precious metals and gems all the time. I have done much research and supplied dates of numerous Chinese inventions in my posts to prove my point, whereas you are making up obvious lies in your posts, such as claiming that mail armor can withstand high powered arrows and crossbow bolts, when this is proven to be false.
    3
  8688.  @Shadowless_Kick  "Hu is physically weak, but mentally strong enough to judge right and wrong." Are you his doctor or something? You said: "Majority of overseas Chinese, include many pro-government, pro-CCP folks, think it is so obvious that Hu was forced to leave to prevent him from showing objection to the result of the election" Do you have evidence that majority of overseas Chinese think this way?
    3
  8689. The USA approved 60 billion of military aid to Ukraine.
    3
  8690.  ChinaAintGot NoTegridy  Source: Covid-19 is NOT a bioweapon created in a laboratory, say UK scientists as wild theories sweep the internet dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8127885/Covid-19-NOT-bioweapon-created-laboratory-say-UK-scientists.html
    3
  8691.  RIDIN’ HIGH 5150  About the Social Credit System, many foreigners often complain Chinese people spit in public, smoke in non-smoking areas, jump queues, disobey traffic rules, jay walk, drive on wrong side of the road, speed through red lights, etc when not all Chinese people are like that. We Chinese feel embarrassed that such bad people represent China overseas, so the government introduce social credit system to discourage such bad behaviour and promote better behaviour instead. This is a meritocratic system where good behaviour is rewarded and bad behaviour penalised. But if such people persist with bad behaviour, until their scores fall to become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisances of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again.
    3
  8692.  @jasonleetaiwan  I will give an example in the United States. In many states in the U.S, you can't walk around in public with an open bottle of an alcoholic beverage, the police will come arrest you. Whereas in China, you can walk around in public while drinking alcoholic beverages and the police won't come arrest you. Isn't this a kind of freedom in itself?
    3
  8693.  @michaelmoore1637  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    3
  8694.  @kalitech2026  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. So which country is the real threat to global peace and stability here?
    3
  8695.  @roshanigladson9331  The US hacking into defence was by unknown hackers, so why are you bringing this up and blaming China? Indian PM Narendra Modi publicly stated that "Chinese troops did not enter Indian territory and no posts were taken." Also, other countries put up their lands for sale then why can't Chinese buyers purchase those property legally, since they are for sale? You're blaming the buyer for purchasing what's for sale? China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019, so what suppressing news about Covid-19 are you talking about? Chinese medical experts have been sharing their knowledge of Covid-19 with the rest of the world, even Jack Ma Foundation published a Covid-19 handbook available to everyone.
    3
  8696. @Shivam B WeChat is far superior to WhatsApp, with just a single app, people in China can make payments, order food, water, book medical appointments, book taxis, pay the fare, pay bills, split the bill (going Dutch), transfer funds, share location, pick up laundry and so many more functions that are unavailable in WhatsApp.
    3
  8697. @Shivam B "神州 Shenzhou lol the percapita income of Taiwan is 3 times than the ccp regime" You want to compare per capita, then mainland China has the world's largest population of 1.4 billion people, so of course when you divide our GDP by our enormous population, then it's going to be smaller. Why don't you compare the percapita GDP of China with India (world's largest democracy) for a fairer comparison between the world's 2 largest population countries? India is world's largest democracy yet their GDP percapita is behind China's?
    3
  8698.  @swanie360  "神州 Shenzhou Parcel Islands aren't Chinese territory?" Majority of the Paracel Islands lie within 200 NM of China's geographic baseline, so it's within China's EEZ (Exclusive Economic Zone).
    3
  8699.  @NoChinaforever17  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    3
  8700.  @NoChinaforever17  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    3
  8701.  @NoChinaforever17  You're not white too, if you go to Anglo-Saxon country, they consider you to be yellow, just like Chinese and Japanese.
    3
  8702.  @cchc245  If Taiwan is an independent country, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there some force preventing Taiwan from joining the UN?
    3
  8703.  @gravydave1771  "神州 Shenzhou Yup, Beijing blocks all efforts for Taiwan to join." Congratz, you've just proven that Taiwan is not an independent country after all, since Beijing controls Taiwan and prevents them from joining the UN as an independent country. And the KMT did not fight against Japan initially. When the Japanese invaded Manchuria in 1931, Chiang kai-Shek was reluctant to meet the invaders, instead he continued purging communists (our fellow Chinese brethren), until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap Chiang in order to get him to ally with the communists. This incident is known as the Xi'an Incident (西安事变). Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was thanks to communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu who arrived Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release, that he finally agreed to ally with the communists against the Japanese.
    3
  8704.  @julion89  "Shenzhou. I'm sure your Islamic allies will be happy to hear that" They are always welcome to govern their own countries as they see fit. If they want to elevate religion above their own government, that's their choice and their faith. Whereas as I've stated in China's case, the government is above religion. It doesn't mean our countries can't be allies on the global stage.
    3
  8705.  ESIREYEWUN SANNI  About the One Child Policy, in the past China was still dirt-poor country, suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems at that time. Why allow families in China to raise multiple kids, only for them to starve to death, succumb to childhood diseases, and having not enough food, not enough hospitals, and not enough schools to send them all to? Why not make families focus all available resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood, and get him into a good school? According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Look at India, world's 2nd largest population country, and India is suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems that China once suffered from in the past.
    3
  8706. 这些外国人根本不懂台湾中国关系，还想插嘴胡言乱语。
    3
  8707.  @hazadus3  In Chinese Confucius culture, we honor our elderly folk, for they are a font of wisdom and experience to draw upon. Filial piety is prized and taking care of parents is expected, so why not sacrifice China's economy to prioritise people's lives and contain the virus? It goes without saying that losing money is painful, but money loss can always be earned back eventually. But once lives are lost, no amount of money is going to bring dead people back to life. It's different priorities.
    3
  8708.  @hazadus3  That's where the countries national reserves come into play. The United States unveiled a $2 trillion rescue package. European countries have announced their own spending blitz, and Japan approved a nearly $1 trillion economic stimulus plan. But countries where people subsist on daily wages and not getting paid means not being able to eat for that day are going to be hit the hardest like the workers in India and African countries.
    3
  8709.  @icefrost5355  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    3
  8710.  @remusoctavianmocanu2885  Agreed. Previously, Joe Biden voted in favor of the Iraq War, arguing strongly in favor of the 2002 resolution granting President Bush the authority to invade Iraq. Biden himself had enormous influence as chair of the Senate committee on foreign relations and he mainly chose people who supported a pro-war position. That's his war-time record in the past, who knows if he will continue this record as POTUS
    3
  8711. Even though Thailand was historically never colonized, it appears that some Thais are suffering from "colonial mindset" to worship white culture and harbor disdain for their own local culture, so much such that they are willing to fly overseas to defend democratic ideology.
    3
  8712.  @travisconfer2255  What makes you think you are free in the West?
    3
  8713. ​ @gamingchamp6728  Why can't we keep gamers from buying too many games? The Social Credit System penalizes gamers who purchase too many games, by slowing them their Internet speeds for example. Computer gaming addiction is real phenomena in China and many youths are suffering from it and require rehabitation.
    3
  8714.  Narglar Wing  I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, and I was appalled at the sheer amount of Western anti-China propaganda out there. Whenever I bring up China's achievements, many Westerners just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill, or told me to "Go back to China if you like it there!"
    3
  8715.  @laserraiset3300  You said: "Issuance of RMB is not a sign of confidence. It's just to satisfy the demand. When an economy grows up, more money is needed to keep the resources flowing." So you're saying China's economy is growing, and more money is needed to keep resources flowing and to satisfy the demand? Then doesn't this already illustrate China's growing confidence?
    3
  8716.  @laserraiset3300  Historically, the territory of Ukraine belonged to external powers like the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, the Austrian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Tsardom of Russia and of course, the Soviet Union. Even the name "Ukraine" comes from the old Slavic term for "borderland".
    3
  8717.  user-yu8ve9iy4q  Pray tell, what's the actual figure China's real GDP then?
    3
  8718.  user-yu8ve9iy4q  Russia had warned about NATO's eastward expansion right up to Russia's doorstep. After realizing that for years, his words had fallen on deaf ears in the West, Putin finally decided to act.
    3
  8719.  Tim Loo  In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned corporations for China's benefit, reining in companies when they gone too far. Whereas in the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit, waging wars in the Middle East to control the oil for example.
    3
  8720.  @PL22-JudgeDredd  It's a difference between Western and Eastern culture. During the early stages of Covid-19, many Asians in Western countries wore masks in public, but some Westerners mocked Asians who wore masks, spit on them, because mask-wearing is perceived as being selfish, trying to protect oneself from getting infected by others Coronavirus Hate Crime: Asian Lady Attacked For Wearing Mask In New York City Subway youtu.be/08QojgjUPiI But in Chinese/Asian countries, wearing a mask is seen as being polite, that you are protecting others from catching your infection (assuming oneself is infected) that's why it's a difference in Western and Eastern culture.
    3
  8721.  @zackk4969  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"? Video: Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' youtu.be/DPt-zXn05ac
    3
  8722.  @stunningandbrave2520  Since when did you post any answer to my question?
    3
  8723.  @daviddave6796  Who does Apple compete with in the American smartphone market? In China for example, there are many smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Oppo, Lenovo, Vivo, etc, and it's this wide variety of competing companies that drive innovation. Whereas in the United States, the smaller companies end up selling or working for the giants (like you said). Smaller companies also tend to lack the funds and resources for R&D, while the giants may feel no pressure to innovate due to being a monopoly.
    3
  8724.  @rv8804  said "Western students are not trying to get into Chinese universities." That is incorrect, China has also become a top destination for international students. As of 2013, China is the most popular country in Asia for international students, and ranks 3rd overall among countries, and surpassing even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, India, Singapore, etc in terms of hosting the most international students. Source: China ranks 3rd among countries that host the most international students - Institute of International Education report. usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/2013/10/08/explore-the-worlds-top-universities
    3
  8725.  @after1001  Chinese chemist Tu Youyou 屠呦呦 won the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, for discovering artemisinin (also known as qinghaosu) and dihydroartemisinin, which is used to treat malaria. So many millions of lives in South China, Southeast Asia, Africa, and South America have been saved thanks to her efforts and her contribution.
    3
  8726.  @AIRBORNEUSARMY-kl5ot  said: "America introduced China to WTO." Pfftt! Don't act as though U.S is inviting China to WTO. When WTO was founded in 1995, China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate our country as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because the United States and its allies requested that China first reform various tariff policies, including tariff reductions, open markets and industrial policies. The US imposed additional conditions on China and when China joined the WTO, it agreed to considerably harsher conditions than other developing countries. So please don't act as though USA introduced China to WTO. We wanted to join back when WTO was founded in 1995, but we were thwarted by USA and we had a late entry to WTO after 6 years, in 2001.
    3
  8727.  @hendrikmintarno  "神州 Shenzhou i thought youtube still banned in China." I have read your source and it says YouTube is blocked in China, not banned in China. So did you read your source carefully before making such a claim?
    3
  8728.  @hendrikmintarno  YouTube was bought over by Google and Google left China of their own accord, because they were unable to capture a substantial part of China's economy. According to Forbes, Google's market share in China increased from 15% (mid-2006) to 31% (2010), but its competitor Baidu's market share increased from 47% (mid-2006) to 64% (2010) which is a huge lead. Source: Why Google Is Quitting China forbes.com/2010/01/15/baidu-china-search-intelligent-technology-google.html#538bca478844 According to the source, Baidu also offered several popular features over Google, so in the end, Google decided to cut its losses and leave Chinese market. Because it failed to capture enough of the Chinese market.
    3
  8729.  Appu  Chinese propaganda actually sucks. Nobody believe Chinese propaganda, but American propaganda is very effective, they can convince people to hate a country that they never even been to. They think America has free media so every news (including fake news) is true, especially regarding portraying China in negative light.
    3
  8730.  @zetristan4525  Perhaps you're referring to mansana?
    3
  8731. Isn't that the same as the credit system used in the West to gauge whether someone pays their debts?
    3
  8732.  @Andy-P  China is home to world's 2nd largest number of billionaires according to Forbes. Here's a list of countries by number of billionaires. 1. United States (735) 2. Mainland China (495) 3. India (169) 4. Germany (126) 5. Russia (105) 6. Hong Kong, China (66) ... 9. Taiwan, China (52) How can Taiwan island match mainland China in terms of number of billionaires?
    3
  8733. China is 3rd country in the world to independently launch and operate spacestations of our own, besides the United States with Skylab and Soviet Union with Mir, and we are the 1st Asian nation to do so. During its lifetime, China's Tiangong-1 hosted Chinese astronauts who conducted research in zero gravity environments, and there was even a live broadcast where astronauts demonstrated simple zero gravity experiments to schoolchildren directly on the ground. Video:Chinese astronaut gives lecture to her students directly from space youtube.com/watch?v=OUAuZnpoZ58 This space lecture help to solidify the idea in our children's minds, that China is a space nation, and capable of achieving equally impressive feats in space as Western nations. You label Chinese space agency as primitive, but it has accomplished much despite China being relatively new to space exploration, and triumphing other Asian nations like Japan and South Korea in certain areas.
    3
  8734. China has the world's largest high-speed railway network (beating even Japan's Shinkansen ) that allow many commuters to arrive at their far-away destinations in shortest possible time. During Chinese New Year, many people used to take days of travel in order to reach their home province for reunion dinner, but thanks to hi-speed rail, the commuting time been reduced to mere hours. China has contributed much to astronomy by providing detailed records and observations of the ancient skies. The supernova that created the Crab Nebula was observed in 1054, and recorded by Chinese astronomers, enabling future astronomers to know more about supernovae. Ancient Chinese people also invented the armillary sphere (celestial globes) to help assist the observation of the stars. Recently in 2017, China completed construction of the world's largest radio telescope, the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope's (FAST) also known as Tianyan 天眼 ("Eye of the Heavens") in order to better observe the heavens. Generally speaking, the larger the telescope, the more sensitive it is, and more able to pick up trace information from space, which will help scientists learn more about the universe's early days, detect low-frequency gravitational waves and hunt for signals that may have been produced by distant alien civilizations, Source:China Finishes Building World's Largest Radio Telescope space.com/33357-china-largest-radio-telescope-alien-life.html
    3
  8735. It's a fact that NATO has expanded eastwards right up to Russia's doorstep.
    3
  8736.  @sunnyboynfs  What's happening with Laos? Did you hear about the opening of China-Laos HSR increasing the connectivity between our two countries?
    3
  8737.  @sunnyboynfs  And what about Sri Lanka? Sri Lanka's economic problems are caused by global inflation and Russo-Ukraine conflict, so how is China to blame for Sri Lanka's economic woes?
    3
  8738.  @sunnyboynfs  Those 10 countries haven't fully rejected China's offer, the 10 countries had agreed to memorandums of understanding on China's "Belt and Road" infrastructure initiative, and will continue to have ongoing and in-depth discussions and consultations to shape more consensus on cooperation.
    3
  8739.  @sunnyboynfs  "神州 Shenzhou Watch the news my friend." Could you perhaps show me the formal written statement by those 10 Pacific nations, stating that they reject China's offer?
    3
  8740.  @MarkYeung1  The colonial era is over, some Hong Kong people (but not all) still retain the subservient "colonial mentality" inflicted onto them by their colonial masters. Even though the British have physically decolonized form Hong Kong, the "decolonization of the mind" is still ongoing in Hong Kong.
    3
  8741.  @MarkYeung1  Sovereignty begins when your country is in control of itself, but in Ukraine's case, it's the U.S that doesn't want peace.
    3
  8742.  @MarkYeung1  Again, read my earlier post. China has proposed a peace plan for Ukraine and Russia agreed to this plan, but USA is against this. Shouldn't be up to Ukraine whether to accept this peace plan, instead of letting the US decide for them?
    3
  8743.  @item6931  According to The Guardian: Vladimir Putin has welcomed China’s proposals for peace in Ukraine at a joint press conference with Xi Jinping in Moscow.
    3
  8744.  @MarkYeung1  According to NBC News: Xi Jinping is willing to speak to Zelenskyy, E.U. chief says. China's Xi Jinping expressed willingness to speak to Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, the head of the EU said.
    3
  8745.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Russia did not agree to the peace plan." According to The Guardian: Vladimir Putin has welcomed China’s proposals for peace in Ukraine at a joint press conference with Xi Jinping in Moscow.
    3
  8746.  @MarkYeung1  Speaking at the Kremlin during a joint news conference after the second day of talks with China’s president, Xi Jinping, Putin said Beijing’s peace plan “correlates to the point of view of the Russian Federation” and said that Ukraine’s western allies so far have shown no interest in it. - The Guardian So isn't it apparent that the US does not want peace in Ukraine?
    3
  8747. @TRUTH EXPRESS "神州 Shenzhou the problem is that china has different standards and views compared to the rest of the world." Who are you to define what is the standard internationally? Dogs are considered haram (forbidden) in Muslim law, yet you just proclaim that they are "man's best friend"? And many Indians view the cow as a sacred animal, yet many people in the world eat beef.
    3
  8748. @TRUTH EXPRESS "technically, every state has the right to join or leave in a perfect world." So you support the 2014 Crimea Referendum, in which an overwhelming majority (i.e 97%) voted to join the Russian Federation? Then why does Ukraine insist on taking Crimea instead of respecting the Crimean people's wish to join Russia?
    3
  8749.  @MarkYeung1  Russian President Putin said that China's peace plan for Ukraine could be used as a basis to end the war, but the plan could be put forward only when they are ready "in the West and Kyiv". So it's as good as Russia agreeing to China's peace plan, its just that the U.S opposes this peace plan, that's why it's not being implemented. Source: BBC: Putin: China plan could end war, but Ukraine and West not ready for peace
    3
  8750.  @item6931  You said: "Long range precision weapons disagree with you." Russia has arguably the most advanced anti-aircraft/anti-missile system in the world, the S-400 to safeguard the Power of Siberia. Not only that, but any destruction of Russian-Chinese pipeline by a foreign power would be a declaration of war in itself.
    3
  8751. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    3
  8752. Maybe the whole Out-of-Africa Theory is all wrong, and Homo Sapiens actually evolved in China not Africa. After all, the tools in China appeared some 300,000 years before the time when the earliest homonids were thought to have made it out of Africa.
    3
  8753.  @宋庆-i4m  Police data from 16 major cities showed 164% increase in anti-Asian hate crimes, compared to the same time last year. Video: New Data Shows Rise In Anti-Asian Attacks | NBC Nightly News youtu.be/sX_wzM-aQF4
    3
  8754.  @PrimeChaosVC  Exclusive: China to invite European diplomats to Xinjiang in new diplomatic push (reuters.com/article/china-xinjiang-idINKCN1R10QW )
    3
  8755. India picked China because over the USA because the US is upset at India purchasing Russian gas.
    3
  8756.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "For example, European companies are not allowed to participate on the Chinese 5G network." Which European companies are not allowed to participate on the Chinese 5G network? In 2015, the EU and China signed a key partnership on 5G.
    3
  8757. ​ @kyosokutai Taiwan's economic success was the result of authoritarian, single-party Kuomintang rule for more than half its life. For decades, the KMT rule Taiwan with an iron fist and Chiang Kai-shek was a dictator, jailing or executing rivals and political dissenters in a period known as White Terror (Taiwan). The KMT also imposed martial law in Taiwan for 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Yet Taiwan's economy flourished under single-party KMT rule, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle. Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7% between 1952–1982, and at 6.9% between 1983–1986. It's only when democracy was introduced to Taiwan in the late 1990s that Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. So it was authoritarian rule that made Taiwan one of the Four Asian Tigers/Dragons, not Western-style democracy.
    3
  8758. China has demonstrated anti satellite capabilities in 2007, by taking out a satellite in orbit using missile launched from the ground. How will the rest of the war pan out if PLA destroys Indian army satellites in space then?
    3
  8759. Regarding the numerous Indian strategic targets, China's DF-41 is capable of multiple independent reentry vehicles (MIRV) of up to 10 warheads, allowing independent targeting of up to 10 strategic targets with each launch. So with just 5 of these missiles, the PLA can theoretically take on 50 independent strategic targets in India. Does this make sense?
    3
  8760.  @boss-anova  When is the last time USA been on the Moon? NASA been neglecting the Moon for almost half a century already.
    3
  8761.  @crusoerob8550  What makes you seem to think people in mainland China cannot comment here? Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    3
  8762.  @Andy-P  Well, that just goes to show that Taiwan isn't an independent country after all, since they don't even have the ability to amend their own constitution and formally declare independence.
    3
  8763.  @crusoerob8550  What military tanks standing in front of banks? Turns out that the tank video was old footage filmed in Rizhao City in Shandong province as part of military drills, and it's not actually happening in Henan right now.
    3
  8764.  @storage4539  Chinese propaganda sucks and clearly needs improvement, that much I agree. Hardly anyone trusts what comes out of Chinese media, even though they often quote data and statistics. On the other hand, Western propaganda is very effective. Many people willingly believe Western propaganda even when it's unsubstantiated by proof.
    3
  8765.  @David-og7di  "Do you think China NEEDS OR WANT propaganda? Could they live without it?" China clearly NEEDS propaganda, even if only to counter Western anti-China propaganda if nothing else. It's becoming clearer each day that U.S-China relations are deteriorating and Western propaganda is pushing for a potential war with China, deliberately painting China in a negative light and "demonizing" our country. Chinese propaganda is necessary because it would help clear up misunderstandings and promote peace and cooperation between USA and China. If a war does eventually break out between USA and China, it means that Western propaganda has won, and Chinese propaganda has failed to deliver peace.
    3
  8766.  @storage4539  "Their Chinese counterpart can learn from the west and gain credibility if they allow the opposition in China to have a voice." There are disadvantages to such a implementation that needs to be taken into account. Allowing an opposition voice in China will allow foreign entities to infiltrate Chinese society, sow discord and promote separation (as shown in the 2019 Hong Kong riots) that could prove catastrophic for China. I think the better solution is for Chinese media to learn from the outlets like RT News. I watched RT News and their presentations are slick and convincing, they intimately understand their audience's way of thinking and knows how to use that to their advantage. Chinese media like CGTN pales in comparison to RT News, even though it's an English-language program, it still largely fails to connect with the Western way of thinking. This is where Chinese media could potentially learn from and improve, in my opinion.
    3
  8767.  @joshlewis575  Cyrus is clearly concerned about deteriorating U.S-China relations and that this could potentially lead to outright war between the two powers (which would be a disaster for the world) so isn't Cyrus doing good here by helping spread awareness of this worst case scenario and how to avoid it?
    3
  8768.  @storage4539  "神州 Shenzhou Not until we control and bring the world under the rules of China, we need to fight the western info front." When has China ever wished for such a scenario? China isn't going around enforcing our political system onto other countries, it's actually the U.S that's doing such a thing, so why are you advocating that China do the same as the U.S? "Our dear leader Xi Jinping has reinforced the firewall, but our people constantly sneak out and get indoctrinated by western lies. You and I speaking freely on YouTube shows how impotent the firewall is." Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so? There are so many foreign companies that come to China and set up shop here, and they require access to Western websites like Facebook, Twitter, etc, so the government issue VPN license to these companies. "By domesticating second tier western media whom is prone to spread fake news, plus our forged evidence if needed, we can invalidate and disparage the western hypocrisy in our own terms to our people and the world audience effectively." This sentence in itself is full of contradictions. We can't "invalidate and disparage the western hypocrisy" if our media itself resorts to "forged evidence" it's clearly an extremely risky maneuver with little probability of success. "CGTN's impartial cover has been blown since they registered as a foreign agent. The west knows that it is a party month piece and every word from it is just not trustworthy." I'm pretty sure Western audiences already know about CGTN's affiliations (they literally include it on YouTube disclaimers) so isn't this point moot? "Our central government should just cut CGTN out to save our face but let lousy western media in for our local puppet shows." I've previously addressed this point that it's a huge risk of this backfiring, and people in China getting hoodwinked by foreign media. On the other hand, foreign media will gain a foothold in China in order to convince more people to their cause.
    3
  8769.  @rr7369  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago (longer than the entire colonial history of the Americas) how is Tibet not part of Chinese history? Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    3
  8770.  @rr7369  But Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, before the Western colonists even colonized America. Just look up Yuan Dynasty and Qing Dynasty Map of China and Tibet was part of Chinese history. Even today, countries all over the world recognize Tibet Autonomous Region as part of the People's Republic of China, just look up Map of China and Tibet is within Chinese territory. At the United Nations summits, nobody brings up the issue of Tibetan sovereignty, because your countries recognize Tibet as part of China. As for Americans taking over Mexico, did you know Texas was once part of Mexico but has been annexed by the United States? Also, the United States can claim Hawaii and Guam islands that are out there in the Pacific Ocean, far away from the American mainland, despite those islands not being historically part of USA. Since countries all over the world accept Hawaii and Guam as part of the USA, then why can't you accept Tibet as part of China? Even countries all over the world today accept Tibet as part of China, but not you?
    3
  8771.  @rr7369  "神州 Shenzhou who says that I accept this places as part of the US?" Then why don't you go protest US occupation of Hawaii and Guam then? Those islands are out there in the Pacific Ocean and miles away from the American mainland and were never part of American history. Where's Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago and is recognised as part of China today by countries all over the world in comparison. "In my mind every region that once independence from a country should have a right to do so." So you support Catalonia independence from Spain then?
    3
  8772.  @rr7369  So if 1 person in your country wants independence, you're going to just blindly support this person?
    3
  8773.  @rr7369  "神州 Shenzhou you forget that I'm in favor of democracy," If you're truly in favour of democracy, then can't you accept China's rejection of Western style democracy? China has found a political system that's shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then is there really a need to abandon our political system (that works) and to adopt a Western style democracy? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. I mean, look at India (world's largest democracy) and why hasn't India surpassed China yet, if democracy was so great? Also, the people of Tibet Autonomous Region are doing well under communist party rule, here's a vlogger (Where's Poppy) visit to Lhasa. You claim Tibet would be better off under democracy, but how? Look at its neighbours like India and Bhutan and Tibet Autonomous Region is more advanced than its neighbours. Video: First Day in Lhasa, Tibet https://youtu.be/3WetplXVVUo
    3
  8774.  @rr7369  serpentza is unreliable source about China has a history of lying to his audiences. For example, serpentza claims that Dune movie posters in China excluded black actress Sharon Ducan-Brewster. But this has since been debunked and it turns out that the Dune movie posters in China do feature Sharon in them. Video: Anti-China Racists Lie About China's Dune 2021 Movie Posters https://youtu.be/zu6WJBVMgHM
    3
  8775.  @rr7369  How does that argument work? serpentza's argument was that China censored black actress Sharon Ducan-Brewster from Dune movie posters, but Baidu already shows that this is not true, and that there are Dune movie posters in China featuring Sharon, then already serpentza's claim that China censors blacks have been debunked.
    3
  8776.  Numinous Thought  China is currently under "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics" where we are in the primary stage of socialism and needed to engage in economic growth before pursuing a more egalitarian form of socialism, with the eventual goal being communism (as described in Marxist orthodoxy).
    3
  8777.  @maicholaa7482  If the Communist Party's message is to build bridges and connect cultures, then what's wrong Cyrus Janssen spreading the same message?
    3
  8778.  @maicholaa7482  You said Cyrus Janssen is spreading the message of "building bridges to connect cultures" and that that's the same message as the Communist Party of China is saying. That's your own conclusion, so what's wrong with supporting such a message?
    3
  8779.  @matthewmorgan7106  About Communism versus Capitalism, it's no secret today that Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." The Earth's resources are finite and capitalism seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources, whereas communism is dedicated to distributing resources according to needs.
    3
  8780.  @matthewmorgan7106  Capitalism rewards monopolies like how Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon, dominate their respective industries and eliminate competition. China actually has an anti-monopoly law to clamp down on anti-competitive practices in the industry, even Jack Ma of Alibaba is being investigated under anti-monopoly law.
    3
  8781. Why aren't the American spraying disinfectants on the streets? I've seen developing countries spray disinfectants in public areas, but not the USA, despite it being the epicentre.
    3
  8782. Actually, now that those Uighur extremist are in schools, the Xinjiang policeman's main job is to search for those pesky journalists that masquerade as tourists in order to paint a negative picture of Xinjiang for Western news.
    3
  8783.  @ebonymaw8457  And stop those journalists filming in restricted areas in China. If you come to China and stay in our country, then shouldn't you at least observe Chinese laws under China?
    3
  8784. According to Indonesia’s Top Trading Partners worldstopexports.com/indonesias-top-15-import-partners/ 1. China: US$23 billion (13.7% of total Indonesian exports) 2. United States: $17.8 billion (10.6%) 3. Japan: $17.8 billion (10.5%) 4. India: $14.1 billion (8.3%) 5. Singapore: $12.8 billion (7.6%) ... ... So if China loses the trade war, Indonesia suffers from losing its biggest trade partner. If USA loses, then Indonesia loses its 2nd largest trade partner. Either way, Indonesia is screwed.
    3
  8785. ​ @nobody342  If your wife obtains U.S citizenship, then it's only fair that she gets the same status as a foreigner and she will lose all existing Chinese citizenship privileges (including that small piece of land) and she will have to go through the same process to own that property as other foreigners. From the government's point of view, the land in China should be for Chinese to develop and shouldn't end up in foreigners hands. I mean, what if she decides to move to USA and let that property remain fallow and unused?
    3
  8786. 战忽局同志辛苦了
    3
  8787.  @thedarkside3178  Can China send these to India?
    3
  8788. Xinjiang is actually doing well and they can't find anything conclusive, so they choose to film in the dark at night, so that you can't see what's really going on. They also use distorted voices (like that Uighur interview in the train) because they can't find any evidence of bad talking so they manufacture mysterious unnamed witnesses instead.
    3
  8789. Many Indians (but not all) are still suffering from a "colonial mindset" that's been imposed on India as a result of British colonialism. Even though Britain has since physically decolonized from India, the "decolonization of the mind" among many Indians is still ongoing, with some Indians still blindly worshiping their former colonial masters.
    3
  8790.  @Mk..56  George Yeo was asked by reporters if Singapore would like to join this Chinese commonwealth (given the prevalence of Chinese culture in Singapore) to which Yeo replied "never (in) the political sense." So it turns out that he himself can't accept applying this commonwealth idea to his own country, let alone mainland China and Taiwan island adopting this idea.
    3
  8791.  @alvarny77  Isn't the current status quo (between Taiwan and mainland China) the actual middle ground right now?
    3
  8792.  @Planetarian43  The term "commonwealth" is strongly associated with the colonial powers. Some might even say it's an attempt by Britain to retain some degree of control over its former colonies (of which Singapore happens to be one) This may be why George Yeo thinks it's a great idea, but China is a civilization state with 5,000 years of history, culture and a different way of thinking. In Chinese minds, the best solution is still reunification through the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy.
    3
  8793.  @alvarny77  The current status quo is arguably the best path towards eventual reunification. Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out stems from perceived US support for its cause. But as time passes, the US will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer challenge mainland China's rise, by which then their support for Taiwan evaporates and reunification becomes the only option.
    3
  8794.  @reebud  What I'm saying is that if George Yeo doesn't want Singapore to join this Chinese commonwealth that he himself proposed, what are the chances of Taiwan agreeing to this proposal? Also, Mainland China has 56 ethnic groups including Han, Uighurs, Tibetans, Mongolians, Manchurians, etc. Taiwan island also has people of aboriginal descendent other than Han. Are you saying that this proposal should be pitched to Mongolia (which was historically part of Yuan Dynasty China)? I can already guess what Mongolia's response would be. Again, if Singapore itself doesn't want to join this Chinese commonwealth, the chances of Taiwan agreeing to this proposal are just as slim.
    3
  8795. Since when is Youtube banned under government authority? It is only blocked, not banned. Many foreign companies in China rely on Western Internet websites to operate, so they are granted a license for VPN for them to access such websites.
    3
  8796.  @momon4868  China does not beat people to death if they sing a national anthem wrongly. But if you disrespect the Chinese national anthem then you may get arrested under Chinese laws.
    3
  8797. China is world's most populous country and there is very real possibility of having insufficient resources to support everyone in China. Western countries are severely underpopulated by comparison, so why should China bite off more than we can chew?
    3
  8798.  @gavingan4450  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳. It was Mao and the communists that succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. When Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China, China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Chairman Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today. Chinese people owe him that much, that our country is finally reunified after decades of internal strife.
    3
  8799.  @gavingan4450  Under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Under Mao, China's life expectancy at birth nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980. Under Mao, China's infant mortality halved from 195 per thousand in 1950 to 55 per thousand in 1980. Under Mao, illiteracy rates nearly halved, by 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%.
    3
  8800.  Akimbo Soulassassin  If you seen my posts before, then why do you keep on talking to me? I already gave you my viewpoint, but you repeatedly disregarded my point and impose your view that's all.
    3
  8801.  @rastoferi6012  They're afraid because of what happened to existing NATO troops already present in Ukrainian territory. Russia found them and took them out.
    3
  8802.  @xerozero976  You said: "The USA never does the same dirty act as the CCP does." The USA accuse mainland China of potentially abusing the Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now scrapped) yet USA is the one abusing their extradition bill with Canada through the Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou case. Yet you claim the USA never does the same dirty act as the CCP does? The sheer irony of your words!
    3
  8803.  @xerozero976  You said: "China will never become a superpower over the USA!" It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are set and many economists believe that China's economy will eventually surpass the USA's economy in the foreseeable future. If China can someday surpass the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this eventual goal of ours?
    3
  8804.  @xerozero976  If China can someday surpass the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this goal? Britain was colonial superpower during 19th century but was eventually overtaken by USA in 20th century. But prior to that, China (and also India) had been economic superpower for 1800 years and we made up 25% of the world's GDP share, according to world leading British economist, Angus Maddison. Source: Global distribution of GDP among China, India, Western Europe, USA, Middle East from 1 AD to 2003 AD wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA_Middle_East.png And judging from the above trend, it looks as though China is all set to dominate the 21st century.
    3
  8805.  @yslee1401  Meng’s lawyers argued she had just two passports, one from mainland China and one from Hong Kong, China. What 4 other passports are you talking about?
    3
  8806.  @floriankrause7203  So why wasn't there investigations into the "strange pneumonia cases" in Lombardy, Italy on November 2019? A “strange pneumonia” was circulating in northern Italy as long ago as November, weeks before doctors were made aware of the novel coronavirus outbreak in China, one of the European country’s leading medical experts said this week. “They [general practitioners] remember having seen very strange pneumonia, very severe, particularly in old people in December and even November,” Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, said in an interview with the National Public Radio of the United States. Source: Coronavirus: ‘strange pneumonia’ seen in Lombardy in November, leading Italian doctor says malaysia.news.yahoo.com/coronavirus-strange-pneumonia-seen-lombardy-112931229.html “This means that the virus was circulating, at least in [the northern region of] Lombardy and before we were aware of this outbreak occurring in China.”
    3
  8807.  @christianmarriott3696  Western democratic institutions are failing, just look at the election of Donald Trump, Boris Johnson's "Partygate" scandal, and Scott Morrison's backstabbing of France through AUKUS. Democracy itself has multiple definitions but perhaps the most commonly accepted definition is a government of the people, by the people and for the people. In this definition, the United States is not a democracy, because the US Government is of the 1%, by the 1% and for the 1%. The United States appears to be a plutocracy, not a democracy, if the 1% rich Americans and corporations control everything from government policies to deciding which countries to wage war upon.
    3
  8808.  @christianmarriott3696  I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad in the West, but I was appalled at the sheer amount of Western anti-China propaganda out there. Whenever I bring up China's positive achievements, many Westerners (but not all) just laugh at me, calling me brainwashed or a "communist party shill" and some even took it a step further and told me to "Go back to China if you like it there!" Even though many of said Westerners never actually set foot into China and see what life is like here for themselves.
    3
  8809.  @matthewmartin7391  About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    3
  8810. Yes, instead of a single global monopoly, there needs to be multiple smaller firms competing among themselves to deliver the best products/services to customers.
    3
  8811. Cyrus' videos always have the peaceful message of Building Bridges, Not Walls between the US and China, and promoting cooperation between the two.
    3
  8812.  @PyroMax  The government is clearly clamping down on CFC production within the country, yet you're claiming that the CCP is telling lies? Those that produce CFC are illegal in China and at least the government is doing something about it. Besides, the ozone layer hole has shrunk overall, so why make mountain out of a molehill?
    3
  8813.  @PyroMax  How to pinpoint where exactly the CFC is emitting from in China, given the larger number of factories in China? And the ozone layer hole will eventually close up according to NASA, so what's your problem then?
    3
  8814. China is always keen on establishing good diplomatic relations with India. Back when, Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai visited New Delhi, he proposed the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence 和平共处五项原则 to help define China-India relationship, and we are still abiding by those principles even till today.
    3
  8815.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "The Hague/ICJ gave their judgement back in 2016," Who said that it was the Hague/ICJ that gave the ruling over the South China Sea back in 2016? The ruling was done by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which is not a recognized UN agency, unlike the ICJ. Since the ruling was done by a non-UN agency, China reserves the right not to adhere to its ruling regarding sovereignty over SCS islands.
    3
  8816.  @LiterallyMe2022  Haven't you heard of Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident where a Taiwanese boat tried to ram a Philippines Coastguard and in response, the coastguard open fired and killed 65-year old Taiwanese Hong Shicheng (洪石成)?
    3
  8817. ​ @superduper5514  "Shenzhou. Philippine has no intention to go to war with China. It is simply giving the US a strategic place" By offering itself up as a strategic place for US bases, isn't the Philippines opening itself up to conflict against China?
    3
  8818.  @Dragon-g9k7v  So since it's the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) NOT the ICJ that conducted the ruling on the South China Seas, why'd you earlier claim it was The Hague/ICJ that gave their judgement? Yet you're asking him to recommend a book when you got the situation wrong yourself?
    3
  8819.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "The main point still stands since they went through the court of law, show whatever evidence they could." China made a declaration in 2006 (in accordance with Article 298 of the UNCLOS) to not to accept compulsory arbitration by third parties when it ratified UNCLOS. Philippines is a signatory to the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea, which also stipulated bilateral negotiations as the means of resolving border and other disputes. Yet here the Philippines is resorting to 3rd party arbitration through the PCA (which is itself is not even an official UN agency, unlike ICJ).
    3
  8820.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "Care to explain about the blatant lie with the Spratlys island being militarized?" Vietnam began building its first base on Spratly Island in 1976. Two years later, the Philippines built its first base on Thitu Island in 1978. Next Malaysia built a base atop Swallow Reef in 1983, and the Nationalist Chinese government (i.e Taiwan) built its base on 2006 on Itu Aba (i.e Taiping Island) and construction finished by 2008. Mainland China was actually a late comer to the South China Sea, only building a base on Fiery Cross Reef in late 2014. Yet suddenly China is being singled out when all the others (Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia, Taiwan island) had been building bases on those islands long before mainland China.
    3
  8821.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "Looking at your nick, looks like another wumao, do you have permission from the ccp to comment on YT?" How does my nickname 神州 Shenzhou, translate into me being a wumao?
    3
  8822.  @superduper5514  "Shenzhou. So?" So why would Philippines want to be a party to potential conflict over Taiwan? Have Filipinos forgotten about the American-Philippines War in sadly, which over 250,000 Filipino civilians died while fighting against the Americans? Why then would Philippines want to allow the US to use them as a strategic place in a potential conflict over Taiwan?
    3
  8823.  @Leevancliff-v8z  "Shenzhou. To deter the bully of the Philippines sea" There is no internationally recognized "Philippines Sea", but everyone knows it as the South China Sea. Also, Taiwan claims the 11 Dash Line, covering a wider territory of the South China Sea than mainland China's 9 Dash Line, so are you claiming Philippines supports Taiwan's claim to the South China Sea?
    3
  8824.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "Shenzhou. it's a common mistake with the ICJ/PCA thing, which is why I put "The Hague" first." You yourself made a mistake over the ICJ/PCA, yet instead of straight up apologising for it, you just decide to stop the debate on that, and instead demand someone to recommend a book? It just shows that you didn't read books yourself in the first place. "It's also pretty common that news, etc use "The Hague" over PCA." Because the news is trying to make people like you think it was the ICJ that made the ruling on the South China Sea, so they constantly refer to it as "international tribunal in the Hague". But since it's been shown that it was the PCA that did the ruling, then the PCA is NOT the ICJ and therefore, PCA doesn't have the same level of jurisdiction over territorial sovereignty as the ICJ.
    3
  8825.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "You seem to have a bit of problem with your English understanding, it ain't your first language?" So you're now questioning my English proficiency, when you're the one who mistook the PCA for the ICJ in the South China Sea ruling? "Shenzhou. Still doesn't change the facts. Just look at what those islands have, it's clear as day." So why are you ignoring the fact that it was Vietnam who first militarized the Spratly Island in 1976, followed by Philippines in 1978, Malaysia in 1983 and Taiwan island in 2008? Mainland China was the last one to arrive in the South China Sea yet you're singling out China while ignoring the others?
    3
  8826.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "If you aren't in China, why don't you go back to China since it's that great." Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself? Why is it that just because of my username (神州 Shenzhou) you resort to labeling me a wumao? Just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    3
  8827.  Cheng-Tso Hsieh  The Netherlands today doesn't claim Taiwan as part of their territory. Whereas mainland China (and even Taiwan's own constitution) claim that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendment's to Taiwan's constitution, nor a formal declaration of independence, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their constitution.
    3
  8828.  @wom_Bat  If Taiwan is a truly independent country, then why is it during the Olympics, athletes from Taiwan have to participate under the name "Chinese Taipei"?
    3
  8829. American healthcare workers look overwhelmed, tired, overworked and ill-equipped, facing shortage of masks, gloves, goggles, faceshields, PPE suits, and ventilators. The Chinese doctors and nurses look well-equipped in comparison.
    3
  8830.  @MH-il1lk  So it seems you're not aware of Uighur separatists, nor are you talking about Uighur genocide. Then what exactly is your point in bringing up the Uighurs?
    3
  8831.  Meng WAZOO CRIMINAL  Why don't you use the 2 Michaels as your profile pic? Have you forgotten how they look like?
    3
  8832. Republic of China (Taiwan) 🇹🇼 claims 11 Dash Line which is ever greater than People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 9 Dash Line.
    3
  8833.  @keemstarkreamstar7069  Its fortunate China did not follow the path of democracy. I mean, look at India, world's largest democracy. and look at how many people died because of riots in India. Source: List of riots in India wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_riots_in_India At least in China, order is finally achieved after 1989 and there have been no more violent protests since then. If the government had given in to democracy, then we would possibly end up like India today.
    3
  8834. Why do you allow ordinary people to participate in elections? Ordinary people may not necessary vote responsibly (e.g. they don't turn up to vote) or they may make decisions based on emotions not logic (e.g. many British don't like immigrants so they vote Britain to leave the EU) or they may simply lack political awareness of their country's situation, or they may be easily influenced by foreigners (e.g. Russian interference of US elections). Why not allow the people who know how to govern, govern?
    3
  8835.  @fcl3294  "神州 Shenzhou I lived in the PRC for more than 4 years." Which part of China did you lived in? If you open up Baidu website and input "June 4 1989" (1989年6月4日), the Chinese website clearly displays that date in the calendar so why'd you claimed the date June 4 1989 is blocked in the PRC?
    3
  8836. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    3
  8837. According to its constitution, Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    3
  8838. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    3
  8839. The U.S controls about 750 bases in at least 80 countries worldwide Also, the U.S claims China has aspirations for global dominance with it's alleged 2nd overseas base in Cambodia (which both China and Cambodia deny).
    3
  8840.  @markgreen8045  You said: "Let's be realistic and discuss what is happening right now. The CPC has 17 territorial disputes with its neighbors." China shares borders with 14 countries and China has settled land disputes with all our neighbors except for India and Bhutan. -Kazakhstan and China signed border treaty in 1994. -Kyrgyzstan and China signed border treaty in 1996. -Laos and China signed border treaty in 1992. -Mongolia and China signed border treaty in 1984. -Myanmar and China signed border treaty in 1960. -Nepal and China signed border treaty in 1963. -North Korea and China signed border treaty in 1962. -Pakistan and China signed border treaty in 1963. -Russia and China signed border treaty in 1998. -Tajikistan and China signed border treaty in 2011. Only India and Bhutan have yet to resolve their land border issues with China, so why'd you claim China have territorial disputes with 17 neighbors?
    3
  8841.  @markgreen8045  Hate? You're the one who's accusing Cyrus Janssen of being a warmonger and spreading the CPC's message, yet Cyrus Janssen's videos are consistently about promoting peace and "Building Bridges, Not Walls" so aren't you the one seemingly filled with hate here?
    3
  8842.  @MarkYeung1  "In the 1980s, Hong Kong businesses played a big part in investment in China," Meanwhile, Mainland China played a big part in supporting Hong Kong by supplying drinking water (supplied from Guangdong Province). Dongjiang is Hong Kong's major source of water.
    3
  8843. 中国人民在捍卫国家主权和领土完整的正义斗争中形成的“一个中国”原则，具有不可动摇的事实和法理基础，为国际社会普遍接受。
    3
  8844. Do you have evidence of ongoing organ harvesting in China then? According to the following source, China ended the practice of organ harvesting from executed prisoners and since 2013, China has one of the lowest organ transplant rates in the world. Source:Transplants per Million people by country economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2014/12/daily-chart-11
    3
  8845. According to statistics, Chinese workers make only 10 cents to every dollar of profit that Western companies like Apple, Nike, etc, make. Chinese workers only eventually became richer through the painstaking efforts of earning millions of 10 cents slowly over the years, and saving them up to get to where China is today.
    3
  8846.  Gaylord Manlove  Source: Bloomberg: Huawei Has 56,492 Patents and It's Not Afraid to Use Them bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-14/huawei-has-56-492-patents-and-it-s-not-afraid-to-use-them
    3
  8847.  @wally6193  Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    3
  8848.  @yslee1401  So why don't you get Canada to release Meng Wanzhou if you want China to do the same for the two Canadians? Canada started this whole mess, and they know the means exactly how to end this stalemate.
    3
  8849.  @EvilDrDude  Not even the Americans cared about Kuwait initially, until testimony emerged from a little girl (Nayirah) claiming that Iraqi soldiers were taking babies out of incubators. But it turns out it was fake and merely an excuse for the U.S to justify their rationale to support Kuwait in the Gulf War.
    3
  8850. +adlerzwei What Taiwan democracy? Taiwan has been ruled for nearly its entire life by authoritarian single-party KMT. Much of Taiwan's economic growth and prosperity occurred under KMT dictatorship. Only in 2016 (2 years ago) did another political party (DPP) finally took over KMT at the reins, but since then Taiwan's economy has been in a slump.
    3
  8851.  Priya Jaya  You Indians love Chinese products like smartphones such as Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, etc. Xiaomi was started in 2010. Today it's one of the world's most popular smartphones. In India, it's number one. Video: How Xiaomi broke out of China to go global | CNBC Reports youtu.be/291DlKa7iIU
    3
  8852.  @tl4172  China signed a No-First-Use policy regarding nuclear weapons, which means that China will not use nuclear weapons unless we are ourselves attacked with nukes first. However, the USA signed no such agreement, so they can preemptively launch nuclear strike on any country with impunity. So if there is to be a nuclear war, China won't be the one starting.
    3
  8853. Western reporters (like NBC) can pose questions to Putin during press conferences in Russia. Russian media (like RT and Sputnik News) can't do the same to Biden during press conferences in USA. Which one is the authoritarian and democracy I wonder?
    3
  8854.  @bjrnhjortshjandersen1286  China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/j3J196bLP5E
    3
  8855.  @eltyjamessmith3482  About South China Sea, the Vietnamese Prime Minister Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese, in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note itself, published in Vietnamese Newspaper Nhan Dan. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But after it was discovered that the region contained rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind and broke its word, and started claiming those islands as part of Vietnam territory. Why Vietnamese politician can just suddenly their minds just like that?
    3
  8856.  @dustyeyer3573  Chinese government is helping reduce pollution by making the switch to renewable green energy, and China built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, Three Gorges Dam, to supply China with clean renewable energy to fuel our growth. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtube.com/watch?v=b8cCsUBYSkw This is has resulted in China producing more hydroelectric power than any other country in the world, producing 858 billion kilowatt hours a year. But of course, it will take time to make the switch from fossil fuels to renewable green energy. 1. China (858 billion kilowatt hours) 2. Brazil (411 billion kilowatt hours) 3. Canada (373 billion kilowatt hours) 4. United States (276 billion kilowatt hours) 5. Russia (164 billion kilowatt hours) 6. Norway (140 billion kilowatt hours) Source: China is the world’s largest producer of the hydroelectricity. https://ceoworld.biz/2015/10/14/top-10-countries-that-produce-the-most-hydroelectricity/
    3
  8857. With such a huge student population, the competition for the top schools and universities in China is understandably fierce and intense. Most Chinese would probably prefer studying in a local university to studying abroad, if they can help it. But they may choose to study abroad if they fail to qualify for local universities.
    3
  8858. @Bruno Pereira About Democracy, why do you believe that allowing ordinary people to participate in political decision making is a wise idea? Ordinary people are fickle and they make poor voters for several reasons: -Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (i.e. They may not turn up to vote, or they submit blank votes) -Ordinary people may base their vote on emotions, not logic (i.e. Many British don't like immigrants, so majority voted for Brexit) -Ordinary people are susceptible to foreign influences (i.e. Russian interference in US elections) -Ordinary people may simply lack awareness of the country's real political situation, to make informed decisions regarding the country's future. There's a host of other problems associated with democracy, so why not let those who know how to govern, govern? That's what China is doing and look at how successful China is.
    3
  8859.  @moartems5076  American troops did not even invade the Japanese mainland at all, and Japan refused to surrender, even after US atomic bombings of Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Similarly, China is no longer the "sick man of Asia" as portrayed in Western propaganda. According to the following source, polls show only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan. Source: Polls show only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/2156237/what-would-us-do-if-beijing-decided-take-taiwan-force
    3
  8860.  @manojattri9339  USA recognised Taiwan as part of China, President Trump agreed to honor the One China policy after receiving phonecall from President Xi Jinping. Source: Trump Tells Xi Jinping U.S. Will Honor ‘One China’ Policy nytimes.com/2017/02/09/world/asia/donald-trump-china-xi-jinping-letter.html
    3
  8861.  @sureshkandasamy4972  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China under the One China policy.
    3
  8862.  @MJ_ProudHindu  Where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed the declaration and when was it signed? If not, then by default Taiwan is part of China according to Taiwan's constitution.
    3
  8863.  @ccpshillfactchecker7241  What are you, Cyrus' personal tax collector or something? Does he need to file his income tax to you or something?
    3
  8864.  Moonland Almond  What Uighur genocide? The population of Uighurs in China has nearly quadrupled from 3 million (1953) to 11 million (2020). That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    3
  8865. I though this thread was going to be yet another cryptocurrency sell.
    3
  8866.  @Andrew-ib7gs  You said: "As for me, I travelled extensively in mainland China including to Xiangjiang" So you travelled to Xiangjiang (湘江) 12 years ago? But that's the largest river in Hunan Province, which part of the river did you visited?
    3
  8867.  @Andrew-ib7gs  How to engage in "good faith debates" when you begin with ad hominen attacks against someone by attacking his Chinese proficiency right away? That's what you did with the Barretts in your first comment here. Yet when I point out that you misspelled Xinjiang as Xiangjiang, you label me a troll? Why criticise others when you can't take it yourself?
    3
  8868.  @wmjohns881  Because had the whistle-blowers leaked the information to the public, it would spread more panic throughout Wuhan, causing millions to flee Wuhan and infect the rest of the world. China did not lockdown Wuhan because back in 2019 there was no confirmation of human-to-human transmission until January 20th 2020. You expect China to instantly know everything about the coronavirus the instant it's known? There needs to be time for investigation. China has informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    3
  8869.  @Andrew-ib7gs  When did I ever said that the British colonial government were responsible for the housing crisis - because they didn't build it fast enough presumably? Hong Kong's housing crisis is caused by the ineptness of Hong Kong's government, as well as the HK property tycoons seeking to reduce the availabile supply of land, in order to keep housing prices high and beyond the reach of HK young adults.
    3
  8870.  @Andrew-ib7gs  China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. Source: Fishing Industry in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishing_industry_in_China China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_producing_countries_of_agricultural_commodities Even Hong Kong is dependent on the mainland for food, water and even electricity. About 70% of Hong Kong's water demand is met by importing water from the Dongjiang River in neighbouring Guangdong province in the mainland. Hong Kong electrical grid is interconnected with the China Southern Power Grid of Mainland China. Hong Kong imports 23% of its total electricity needs from the mainland. Source: Water supply in Hong Kong wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_supply_and_sanitation_in_Hong_Kong Source: Electricity sector in Hong Kong wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_Hong_Kong#Interconnection_with_China While you live in Hong Kong, you're actually relying on the mainland for your water, food and electricity.
    3
  8871.  @Andrew-ib7gs  You can suddenly bring up unrelated topic like British colonial government being responsible for the housing crisis, then why can't I bring up China's agricultural achievements, since you talked about crops in China? Hong Kong food and water come from the mainland, that's what you're eating and drinking every day in Hong Kong. Hong Kong doesn't even have enough arable land to support their own population, yet you want to complain about mainland produce when that's where your food comes from? About spraying pesticides, China's agricultural technology even makes uses drones for more efficient pesticide use, better pesticide coverage, saving pesticide use and saving manpower. Video: Pesticide-spraying drones rise to challenge of China’s ‘intelligent agriculture’ ambition youtu.be/8ZbhJT6NinM If the mainland suddenly cut off our electrical supply to Hong Kong then Hong Kong would be struggling to produce their remaining 23% of their electrical needs. You don't even give any sources to support your claims. Shenzhen’s economic growth has actually surpassed Hong Kong's in 2017. Source: Shenzhen surpasses US$338 billion GDP mark in 2017, beats Hong Kong and Singapore’s growth scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2128310/shenzhen-88-cent-hi-tech-growth-roll-hit-y2tr-2017 Shenzhen is roughly the same economic size as Singapore and Hong Kong, but recorded nominal output of 2.2 trillion yuan (US$338 billion) in 2017 thanks to its booming hi-tech sector. Over 40% of the output came from “innovative” businesses such as internet, biotech and telecom. And that's despite Shenzhen being under communist party rule, while Hong Kong is suffering under its own democratic government.
    3
  8872.  @Andrew-ib7gs  Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Hong Kong as opposed to the mainland? How can Hong Kong possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    3
  8873.  @Andrew-ib7gs  You live in Hong Kong, so you're eating mainland produce, drinking Guangdong water, and 23% of Hong Kong's electrical needs come from the mainland. You mock China's agricultural produce when Hong Kongers are eating them? Here's another video of China's drone pesticide sprayer. Video: DJI - Agras T16 - Agricultural Spraying Drone youtu.be/Dn7Q4oIrP3I You look down on China's drones then where are the Hong Kong drone technology compared to mainland China? Also, what's wrong with going to Barrett to JaYoe Nation to Gweilo 60 and so on? I follow these channels, what's wrong with me following them? You don't like them, then why follow them and mock Barrett's Mandarin proficiency, when you can't even take criticism yourself?
    3
  8874. War's already won thanks to Putin. The question is will Trump win the peace?
    3
  8875.  @johnnyrommel4113  During the 19th century, Westerners sold enough chests of opium to China to kill everyone on Earth, several times over. By 1880s, there were some 6,500 tonnes of opium being imported into China, because the British forced China to open our ports to opium. Source: Opium imports into China 1650-1880 wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Opium_imports_into_China_1650-1880_EN.svg Even some American fortunes were built upon the opium trade in China, such as the Forbes family.
    3
  8876.  @johnnyrommel4113  The Biden administration slapped fresh sanctions on 24 Chinese officials just the day before the Chinese diplomats left China for Alaska. This act demonstrates American insincerity in coming to the negotiation tables on equal footing and is shows USA is weak and trying to use sanctions to negotiate with China from a stronger position. This is a similar strategy by Biden administration as was used during Trump administration. Also, the US deligates actually asked the media to leave the room after they played tough to China. But Yang asked them "Why are you so afraid of the media being here?" and this let the media stay for China's tough response.
    3
  8877.  @johnnyrommel4113  I never once mentioned your name in my accusations, you're the one who brought up your family's name into this argument, (because you're unable to refute my points). Since you're American, then the Hong Kong issue has nothing to do with America, it's between Britain and China, then why are you butting into Hong Kong then?
    3
  8878.  @johnnyrommel4113  During the meeting in Alaska, the US delegate Anthony Blinken began with their opening salvo against China, bringing up Xinjiang, Tibet, Hong Kong and Taiwan, so how is this the proper way for America to treat its guests? Our Chinese diplomats travel halfway across the globe to frosty Alaska (they couldn't choose a more welcoming meeting ground?) only to be lectured on China's internal affairs by America? When America is suffering from gun violence, racism, Texas icestorms, California wildfires, and the pandemic?
    3
  8879.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou When you phrase questions or phrases in the way you did." Whats wrong with my phrasing? I never once mentioned your name in my accusations I clearly said "Britain wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea" yet you're supposedly correcting me by saying that it was UK? And why the heck did you bring up your family and proclaimed that (and I quote your words) "神州 Shenzhou my family's hands are clean of this." it's like your deliberately trying to absolve yourself of this. How can you be sure? Are you saying that none of your family (including grandparents, great-grandparents, great-great-grandparents) have never read a Forbes article?
    3
  8880.  @johnnyrommel4113  You said: "COVID both originated because of wet markets" Source: Coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, Chinese scientists say scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3051981/coronavirus-did-not-originate-wuhan-seafood-market-chinese You said: "But let's move on please." So you can constantly bring up topics about China then why can't I bring up topics about America?
    3
  8881.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou on the topic of racism you mention." Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors (just ask the expats here) whereas many Westerners are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands with suspicion. Just look at the tragic Atlanta shooting of 8 people, 6 of whom were Asian Americans. Statistics revealed that some 3,000 cases of racially-motivated incidents against Asian Americans occurred in 2020. You said some people on this post have made derogatory remarks against Uighurs, but how do you know for sure that they are Chinese who made such comments?
    3
  8882.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou Ok. But the deal was 2047. So everything you just said was taken away from the people early." I've already responded to this earlier, which you ignored. Earlier I said: You yourself said: "Society changes and evolves." Then two lines later you said: "The rules were not supposed to change until 2047." so what's the meaning of this? There were endless riots across Hong Kong, so why can't Beijing change the rules due to the turbulent times? You yourself admitted that things need to change, but when China does it, suddenly it's wrong?
    3
  8883.  @johnnyrommel4113  You said: "State media doesn't convince us. Only free independent media does." Free independent media is unregulated, how would you know if they use reliable sources or conduct actual interviews? These days, literally anyone can put on a journalist cap and film, giving rise to fake news, so what makes you think free independent media is trustworthy? And SCMP isn't even state media, it's blocked in mainland China.
    3
  8884.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou But you are talking about westerners as a whole when you say it." No, I clearly said "Britain wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea" etc when did I ever said westerners as a whole are responsible for the Opium Wars? I also clearly said "Some Americans fortunes were built upon the opium trade in China" not once did I ever mention you or your family, yet you're accusing me of saying ALL Americans? I don't even know why you're constantly bringing up your wife and kids into the argument, and then claiming that their hands are cleans, I'm not even interested in talking about your wife and kids at all, but you keep bringing them up time and time again.
    3
  8885.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou Some things are sacred to us. One of those things is the people's voice through voting…Evolve yes but not in a way that takes liberty away" Just like some things are sacred to China, which is political stability of the country, above all others. Today, Hong Kong clearly have their own government separate from the mainland, they have elections (they recently held one in 2019 which resulted in landslide victory for pro-democracy). But if not for Beijing's National Security Law, then the Hong Kong protests would have continued, so why can't Hong Kong evolve in a way that takes the "liberty to riot" away? China prioritise political stability over the so-called liberty to riot. …… You said: "We have no justification for this type of action. It's simply not how Americans think. And I don't think losing an election is an excuse to change. The CPC may say different to you but the fact is they lose seats and the rules change." But the people in Hong Kong aren't Americans, why should they follow America's ideals? Just like you're not from Hong Kong, then why are you telling Chinese how to govern our territories? Also, the CPC doesn't hold any seats in Hong Kong's government, all the people in Hong Kong's government are elected by the Hong Kong people themselves through elections and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections. So what lost seats by the CPC are you talking about?
    3
  8886.  @johnnyrommel4113  Look, Biden wants to return America to the pre-Trump era. But remember, that the pre-Trump era was precisely what led to Trump's election in 2016. To further elaborate this example, imagine from the Trump era (B), you want to return to pre-Trump era (A). But (A) was precisely what led to (B) in the first place! (A) -> (B) By returning that pre-Trump era (A), Biden is only setting up the USA to return to the Trump era (B). Unless you change the conditions and fix the root of the problem, you'll see a return to Trump's re-election (or another candidate with similar Trump views) By ignoring the 49% of American voters, you are setting up the same conditions for next election in 2024 to be a close shave as well. …… You said: "But once again, your issue is with Trump. Not me or any other American. Only Trump to blame for that. Rest of us are clean." Why are you Americans always trying to wash your hands clean? Earlier you said your family is clean, now you're saying rest of Americans are clean? Why are you deliberately trying to avoid responsibility? You constantly try to paint Americans as clean, when 71 million of Americans who voted, voted for Trump! You're just going to ignore 49% of Americans votes and claim you're clean? You are illustrating the deep divisions present in American society. By ignoring the 49% and trying to paint rest of Americans as clean, you're just avoiding responsibility for American's actions that's all, what sort of thinking is this?
    3
  8887.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou My point wasnt that I was trying to bring my family into this." But you constantly bring your family into this argument, even though I didn't mention them at all, so what's your point when you keep bringing them up? You can't vonch that no one in your family (including grandparents, great-grandparents, great-great-grandparents) has ever read a Forbes article, so why do you keep on trying to wash your hands clean?
    3
  8888. Hazzycakes If President Xi has shown to be capable of leadership, then I personally see nothing wrong with leaving him in power, in order to maximize the benefits to the country. Why can't competent leaders be allowed to stay in power? Such leaders are rare, and it would be a waste if he is removed from power, simply because of term limits.
    3
  8889. "The Chinese Social Media started flaming her online"
    3
  8890.  Gaylord Manlove  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    3
  8891. Indeed the Soviet Union's dissolution in 1991 had turned Russia capitalistic (like an image of USA like you described) and Putin want's Russia to get out of this "Frankenstein's Monster" that's created. He doesn't want to go down the path the US took (look where it led them today) and neither does he want Russia to return to the old Soviet Union. So I'm thinking his vision of Russia is one that incorporates the best parts from Tsarist Russia and the Soviet Union, drawing strength from Russian cultural identity, religious strength from the Russian Orthodox Church, as well as industrial strength from the Soviet Union. But implementation is going to be difficult, he first needs to secure Russia's borders first, and this includes wrapping up the special military operation in Ukraine.
    3
  8892. As a Chinese myself, I would have personally preferred another 4 more years of Trump rather than Biden. Because although Trump was antagonistic towards China, his utter incompetence in handling Covid-19 would have magnified the consequences of Covid-19 on the USA by 4 more years.
    3
  8893.  @MrGod47  Canada and other Western countries don't have the history of shame of the Opium Wars inflicted on China because of narcotics, that's why they relax the rules for cannabis consumption. But Asian cultures (China, Korea and Japan) have very strong attitudes towards substance abuse because of history, it's difficult to bridge the understanding.
    3
  8894.  @pattysherwood7091  "神州 Shenzhou I can’t buy and sell with digital currency." You can in China. What if the rest of the world adopts this form of transaction and leaves behind the old cash payment systems?
    3
  8895.  @heidibenner1577  If elderly rural farmers in China can use digital currency, what makes you think elderly people in developed countries are unable to adapt? It's up to governments to make their currency easier to use for the elderly folk, and Chinese government has succeeded in this regard.
    3
  8896.  @shinchin384  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    3
  8897.  @Gnomezonbacon  Tiananmen Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According to Gregory Clark, the many witnesses there at the time say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    3
  8898.  @grouchypatch9185  This mark yeung is making a mountain out of a molehill. If she doesn't have her phone, then just send her an email.
    3
  8899.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou see my original comment. If China has free internet, there's no point in splitting up the companies." Douyin is the original version. Tik Tok was created so as to protect Chinese users data and privacy, as Douyin servers are located on mainland China. Whereas Tik Tok's servers are located in the US and Singapore. But if you merge the 2 companies, then the US Congress would ban the app, as it would fall under the control of the Chinese government, so how is the merging any good?
    3
  8900.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou I honestly don't have her email address." You clearly wrote that she's your employee. You employ her and don't have her email address?
    3
  8901. About communication between China and the rest of the world, I mean, everybody has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your lands and spending coin on your tourist industry. Overseas schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students studying with locals, so how is the communication lacking?
    3
  8902.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "why should I make these up?" She's your employee and you don't even have her email address? It really sounds as though you're just making stuff up in order to make a mountain out of a molehill.
    3
  8903.  @jaimemartinez9792  "神州 Shenzhou This was 1 year after you destroyed all evidence!" So according to you, there's no more a need to investigate China then, since you claimed all evidence is destroyed.
    3
  8904.  @df9440  Zhengzhou flood is natural disaster so what has that even got to do with your claims that the CPC are evil?
    3
  8905.  @df9440  你有证据黄色浑确定是泄洪的水吗？没证据就别说了，别血口喷人。
    3
  8906.  @df9440  那你有在隧道里看到黄色浑水吗？怎么确定黄色浑水是泄洪的水？
    3
  8907.  @christianrodm  But my original point was not about the "duration" of eye contact so again, why are you trying to introduce the element of duration, when I never said such a thing? You are putting words in my mouth when I clearly never said such a thing. Also, nobody in this argument is talking about "lying" (except you) Everyone here in this thread talking about how the smiles look fake, and I said "They maintain eye contact and aren't shy or looking away from the camera, so why do you still think that it's fake?" and there was never any mention about "lying" until you brought up the point yourself. There is a difference between a fake smile and outright lying. Sometimes, you fake a smile when you see someone you don't like, but that isn't the same as telling a lie. Its about generating genuine emotions, not the act of passing an untruth as the truth.
    3
  8908.  @andrenogueira5058  In 1958, the Yellow River flooded which coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. In July 1958, the peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 m3/s (790,000 cu ft/s) with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kg/m3 (57 lb/cu ft), 14× and 24× their mean annual values, respectively. The flood water level was so high that it rose up to the top of the levee in several places. This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. It was reported as the most severe flood since 1933. Source: Wikipedia: 1958 Yellow River flood
    3
  8909.  @andrenogueira5058  "神州 Shenzhou My dear friend, I saw the images." What images did you see? Even according to Wikileaks cables there is No Bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989.
    3
  8910.  @YakuzaSRC  You said: "I have no hatred towards anything Chinese (except the CCP)." Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India in the past. But fast forward till today, and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd highest military budget. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western MSM constantly denouncing China's success under the CPC. Why do you as a foreigner, admit to harboring hatred for a government that has led a truly phenomena transformation of China?
    3
  8911.  @johnnyrommel4113  You said: "Joe Biden didn't actually say this." When did I ever said anything about what Joe Biden said? That doesn't stop Westerners from making failed economic predictions about China's upcoming economic collapse. For almost 30 years already.
    3
  8912. There does exist the word "china" (with a lower case C) in the English dictionary, it refers to porcelain, which is also called "fine china", named after the country China of course. But as for "chinese" there is no such word with a lower case C in the dictionary, and I agree that it's grammatically incorrect.
    3
  8913.  @MarkYeung1  I've already explained this earlier, it's because China became the "factory of the world", and the capitalists shifted their factories to China in order to shrink production costs by employing lower wage workers, bringing pollution and corruption to our country. However, China is investing in renewable energy like hydroelectric and solar energy, besides the Three Gorges Dam (world's largest hydroelectric powerstation) China also built world's largest floating solar farm in Huainan City, Anhui province in East China. Video: World's largest floating solar farm in E China youtu.be/qKpYH5SYUeo
    3
  8914. Agreed. Westerners who speak out against the mainstream anti-China narrative in their countries, stand to lose a lot whether its friendships or their reputation, and possibly facing harassment and even death threats to them or their families. That's why I applaud such people for their courage.
    3
  8915.  @ChiefCabioch  You were literally admitting that I somehow chose the "silliest question" you posed, then why are you posing such silly questions, of which you don't want to listen to the answer to? Also you said: "神州 Shenzhou keep changing the subject and deflecting....." next you said: "神州 Shenzhou so let's compare Russian and Ukraines sizes," then aren't you changing the subject yourself? You told me to "Go help the Russians" but it's apparent that the Russians don't need help, it's Ukraine that urgently needs help.
    3
  8916.  @ChiefCabioch  In your post, you literally have no qualms about reducing China to rubble and smoldering ashes. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it seems like the U.S is a threat to global peace and stability.
    3
  8917.  @ChiefCabioch  Look at your earlier comments, you've have no problems with reducing China to rubble and smoldering ashes, yet you still claim that you hold no ill-will towards our country? You complained about China threatening to nuke Japan, yet the United States is the only country in the world to have dropped nuclear weapons (and on Japan no less) so why are you feigning outrage towards China over an action that was undertaken by the United States against Japan?
    3
  8918. ​ @ChiefCabioch  Have you double-checked that list? Nike shoes are made in Vietnam and China (which means Nike hasn't left China) and Apple products are primarily made in China, so how have those companies left China? Even recently, Tesla just opened their first overseas "gigafactory" in Shanghai, for crying out loud.
    3
  8919. Chinese workers help manufacture products like smartphones, computers, appliances, electronics, toys, shoes, sneakers, clothing, etc, cheaply, so that the cost of living in other countries is kept lower than it should be, and people can save money on daily expenses. Think of the millions of dollars people in America save on living expenses over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Isn't that why Americans buy stuff from Walmart?
    3
  8920.  @axelschroeder6657  Well said. Not only in coastal saline water, but China is also planting rice in the desert sand. Video: China is planting upland rice on the eighth largest desert in the country youtu.be/SDgpSWrEP7o
    3
  8921.  @milexiangyangli5666  So for what reason does Singapore slap sanctions on Russia? That certainly seems to indicate that Singapore is not neutral like Joey XiaoQio said.
    3
  8922. BRICS is welcoming the multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice, namely that of the US's.
    3
  8923.  @sharkamov  What makes you think socialism isn't a viable option at all? Take Russia for example, before 1917, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe at that time, dominated by peasants, whose traditional household economies were extremely inefficient compared to agriculture in Western Europe. Only about 15% of the population lived in towns, and fewer than 10% worked in industry. Russia was also technologically backward compared to the more advanced Western European countries. But after the 1917 Communist Revolution, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe during its heyday, both economically as well as militarily (that's why NATO was formed in response to Soviet Union military might). The Soviet Union was also the world's 2nd largest economy from 1960-1985 as well as making several scientific contributions to mankind during this period.
    3
  8924. If foreign companies want to set up shop here in China, they are expected to obey Chinese laws while in China. If foreign companies want access to Western websites, the government issue VPN licence to foreign companies to allow them access
    3
  8925.  @item6931  "神州 Shenzhou China must do more: it is the largest greenhouse emitter by far." China has built the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply clean, renewable energy and reduce our dependency on fossil fuels. Yet this is not enough in your eyes?
    3
  8926.  @张继科の铁粉  Well, if the United States would stop sending warships and surveillance planes from across the Pacific Ocean to the Taiwan Strait then the People's Liberation Army Navy and Air force wouldn't need to dedicate ships and planes to escort those trespassers. And imagine the fossil fuel cost for the USA sending warships and miltary planes across the Pacific Ocean.
    3
  8927. China is helping build infrastructure in African countries, such as roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc. China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    3
  8928.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou Not everyone in the west picks the politically correct answer." Well, I never did say that everyone in the West picks the PC answer, I merely pointed it out.
    3
  8929. Exactly. China found out that "communism" didn't work, so it was modified to "socialism with Chinese characteristics."
    3
  8930.  @light6713  Where does it say that the Africans didn't leave the city let alone the country?
    3
  8931. Victor Ye Becoming powerful is not merely just about inventing new technology all the time. Who can be expected to just come up with a new invention on the spot? But China is surpassing USA in various scientific fields. Take supercomputers for example, China is home to world's fastest supercomputer, Sunway TaihuLight 神威·太湖之光 as well as the world's 2nd fastest, Tianhe-2 天河-2. During a recent 2017 Top 500 supercomputer survey, China even beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source: cnet (dot) com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/
    3
  8932. Chinese invented forks, but preferred to use chopsticks because its more civilized.
    3
  8933.  @kanikapandey4252  Agreed. Since the 19th century, many have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    3
  8934.  @richarde.halliburton8022  Chinese international students are literally everywhere. Virtually all Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students studying the same topics as their peers, learning Western political systems and the differences.
    3
  8935.  @augustuswoods4548  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    3
  8936.  Narglar Wing  While I'll admit that Tibet wasn't part of China until over 800 years ago, Tibet became part of Chinese history after the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. So why can't China return control of our territory then? About the Seventeen Point Agreement, according to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid. "Their feeling of duress derives from the general Chinese threat to use military force again in Central Tibet if an agreement was not concluded. However, according to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid." - Tibetologist Melvyn Goldstein Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement#Repudiation_of_the_agreement
    3
  8937.  @augustuswoods4548  In the 1950s, yes majority of China consists peasants, because the Nationalist Kuomintang transfered China's gold reserves from Shanghai to Taipei, fleeing to Taiwan and leaving the mainland in ruins after the Civil War. After the communists came to power, Chairman Mao Zedong seized the lands from the corrupt, rich landlords and redistributed it to the dirt-poor peasants. For the first time, peasants were allowed to own lands, they could receive a proper education at school and lift themselves over poverty. Our lifespans and life expectancy improved under Chairman Mao's leadership. Source: China Life Expectancy 1950-2021 macrotrends.net/countries/CHN/china/life-expectancy And Chairman Mao did not kill those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Chairman Mao can't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he'll wish for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    3
  8938.  @richarde.halliburton8022  The Roman Empire is no more, and it's been fractured into individual countries, whereas China has always been best ruled under the authoritarian leadership of emperors and the imperial court. Our history proves this, even under "democracy" during Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949), China was a weak, dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country. But today, under the authoritarian rule of the CPC, the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 (1949~) has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    3
  8939.  Narglar Wing  Under Chairman Mao and the communists, China's population doubled, our literacy rates doubled, our lifespans doubled, our life expectancies doubled. Under the communists, women in China were finally granted equal access to education ("Women hold up half the sky" 妇女能顶半边天 by Chairman Mao) women peasant and workers featured prominently in Cultural Revolution posters. Chairman Mao's anti-pest targeted the grain-eating pests. Even without pest-eating sparrows, Chinese farmers reared insects-eating chickens and ducks, our fields had insect-eating frogs and fish. It was the bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation, that plunged China into the Great Chinese Famine. In 1958, the Yellow River flooded in China that coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward, affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. Source: 1958 Yellow River flood wikipedia.org/wiki/1958_Yellow_River_flood Even Chairman Mao can't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he'll wish for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    3
  8940.  Narglar Wing  That doesn't detract from the fact that there were other insect-eating animals like chickens, ducks, frogs and fish in our fields. Even so, Chairman Mao listened to advice and ordered the end of the campaign, yet Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly wants to demonise Mao, even though Chairman Mao did a lot to improve China. "Mao's Great Leap Forward 'killed 45 million in four years'" Where did you get your bloated figure of 45 million killed in 4 years? The Great Leap Forward was on 1958-1962, and China's population was 612,241,552 in 1955 and by 1960, China's population was 660,408,054 having increased by 48,166,502. Source: Population of China in 1955 populationpyramid.net/china/1955/ So you're saying that during the Great Leap Forward, China's population decreased by 45 million people, but from 1955-1960, China's population had actually increased by a further 48 million? Where did you get your exaggerated death toll figure?
    3
  8941.  Narglar Wing  I literally shown information that under Chairman Mao, China's population actually increased during the period of the Great Leap Forward (by an estimated 48 million). In fact, under the Communist Party rule, China's population has nearly tripled in size from 500 million in 1950s to 1.4 billion people today. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. I mean, why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) a so-called "democracy" even lost the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 which consist of dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? Mao Zedong and the communists managed to reunify out divided country where the Nationalist Kuomintang failed to do so for 37 years. When Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    3
  8942.  Narglar Wing  "神州 Shenzhou Because I wasn't attacking your current government." Thr Communist Party of China is the same political entity as was during the Chairman Mao era, so how are you not attacking the current government? Could you please explain? Why is my defending China being misconstrued as being "ultra-nationalist" by you? Over 70 years ago, nobody expected China to succeed yet fast forward to today and look at how far China has grown under the Communist Party leadership. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) but today under People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 (1949~) China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under the same Communist Party of China, that Western anti-Communist propaganda been denouncing all along. Here's another source showing that China's population actually increased during the Great Leap Forward. You can enter in the period of the Great Leap Forward (1959-1962) and it shows that China's population actually increased overall during the GLF under Chairman Mao. Source: China Population 1950-2021 macrotrends.net/countries/CHN/china/population
    3
  8943.  @richarde.halliburton8022  After WWII, South Korea was actually dirt-poor country under democracy (with GDP lower than some sub-Saharan African countries), while North Korea was the more powerful country on the Korean peninsula. That's why North Korea was able to attempt to reunify their divided homeland during the Korean War, but their attempt at Korean reunification was thwarted because the USA intervened in their internal civil war and joined South Korea. After the Korean War, South Korea actually prospered under South Korean dictator, Park Chung-hee. When Park came to power in 1961, South Korea's per capita income was only US$72.00 and North Korea was the greater economic and military power on the peninsula. One of Park's main goals was to end the poverty of South Korea, and lift the country up from being a Third World economy to a First World economy via etatist methods. Using the Soviet Union and its Five Year Plans as a model, Park launched his first Five Year Plan in Korea. Park is credited with playing a pivotal role in the development of South Korea's tiger economy by shifting its focus to export-oriented industrialisation, creating the "Miracle on the Han River" (漢江의 奇蹟) Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Park_Chung-hee#Economic_policy But Park was also a South Korean dictator. In 1972, Park declared martial law and amended the constitution into a highly authoritarian document, called the Yushin Constitution, effectively tantamount to abolition of the former Constitution. During this time, political opposition and dissent was constantly repressed and Park had complete control of the media and military. So South Korea was actually dirt-poor under democracy after WWII and Korean War, it was South Korean dictator Park Chung-hee that brought economic prosperity to South Korea. Not democracy.
    3
  8944.  @augustuswoods4548  So YouTube is deleting your comments, then this shows that censorship exists in the West yet you want to complain about censorship in China? I thought many Westerners boasted that they have freedom of speech in the West. We are talking about Tiananmen Square Massacre itself (that's what you wrote) and I have already cited numerous articles showing that nothing happened and there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989. The students in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully, yet Western media constantly brings up Tiananmen Square Massacre? So Jay Matthews has been showing that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989. According to Jay Matthews article: Student leader Wu’er Kaixi said he had seen 200 students cut down by gunfire, but it was later proven that he left the square several hours before the events he described allegedly occurred. (so how could he have witness the gunning down of students when he left the square earlier?) CBS correspondent Richard Roth’s story of being arrested and removed from the scene refers to “powerful bursts of automatic weapons, raging gunfire for a minute and a half that lasts as long as a nightmare.” Black and Munro quote a Chinese eyewitness who says the gunfire was from army commandos shooting out the student loudspeakers at the top of the monument. (so the People's Liberation Army commandos were shooting at student’s loudspeakers, not at the students themselves) A BBC reporter watching from a high floor of the Beijing Hotel said he saw soldiers shooting at students at the monument in the center of the square. But as the many journalists who tried to watch the action from that relatively safe vantage point can attest, the middle of the square is not visible from the hotel. (so how could he have witnessed soldiers shooting at students at the monument in the middle of the square, when the monument wasn't visible from his vantage point?)
    3
  8945.  @richarde.halliburton8022  And mainland China has become world's 2nd largest economy, larger than Taiwan, Japan and South Korea, without adopting Western brand of democracy so why is there suddenly a need to adopt Western democracy? Taiwan flourished under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, so did South Korea under South Korean dictator Park, as well as Japan during Meiji Restoration, this shows that democracy is not a requirement for economic miracles.
    3
  8946.  @augustuswoods4548  I never said that you suggested that the US hand back the lands of America to Native Americans, I'm the one who made that suggestion here. Because you seem to paint Tibet as separate from China (even though Tibet was part of Chinese since 800 years ago). Even the "democratic" Republic of China 🇹🇼 claims Tibet as part of their territory, including all of mainland as well as territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of ROC Administrative and Claims. Source: Map of ROC Administrative and Claims wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg And about the Seventeen Point Agreement, according to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid. "Their feeling of duress derives from the general Chinese threat to use military force again in Central Tibet if an agreement was not concluded. However, according to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid." - Tibetologist Melvyn Goldstein Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement#Repudiation_of_the_agreement
    3
  8947.  @augustuswoods4548  You said: "Also the very structure of your statements suggest Tibet is separate from China - for if Tibet = China, there would be no need for China to invade Tibet and force a union." I never said that China invaded Tibet, I said that Tibet broke free of China in 1913 but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951, so how does my sentence structure indicate that Tibet is not part of China? Look, even the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet did not call it an invasion, it was called a liberation of Tibet, so what sentence structure are you talking about?
    3
  8948.  @richarde.halliburton8022  "神州 Shenzhou Here's where your argument is starting to loose its impact, because you are now making invalid comparisons and parroting propaganda." Invalid comparisons? You compared all the Western democracies plus those in the East have much higher per-capita GDPs than China, well that's because China has world's largest population so if you divide our GDP by per capital, than of course China is worse off than those lower population countries/regions. I mean, why don't you compare India's (world's largest democracy at 1.3 billion people) per capita GDP with that of China's and see how India is coping with democracy? Instead you compare China's per capita GDP with lower population countries/regions, then how's that a valid comparison? I mean, you clearly want to compare per capita GDP of China with lower population/regions, rather than with India, the world's 2nd most populous country after China at number one. How's that a valid comparison?
    3
  8949.  @augustuswoods4548  So censorship is necessary particularly if it incites violence (like the January 6th Capitol Hill riots) so China has higher quality and quantity of censorship, because we are the world's most populous country and political stability is China's number one priority. About persecution of non-violence individuals, so Liu Xiaobo 刘晓波 was non-violent and arrested, then what about Edward Snowden and Julian Assange who are fugitives in America because of their non-violent freedom of speech in exposing US spying on its allies? And before you cry "Whataboutism" again, you're the one comparing China's quality and quantity of persecution, so we obviously need a comparison here. And you even brought up America for example. And parodying Tibet pre-1951, it's also a form whataboutism using the Communist government instead of addressing my point of Tibet pre-1951.
    3
  8950.  @richarde.halliburton8022  "2. Chiang kai-shek took the gold to Taiwan to keep it out of the hands of the Japanese." But Japan had surrendered on 1945, this gold was transfered by Chiang from Shanghai to Taipei between 1948 and 1949, after the Japanese surrender. "Keep in mind, the CCP at that time was a revolutionary force, not an established government of China. So Taiwan is not a "breakaway" or "separatist province of China - " Now that the Communist Party of China IS the establishment government of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 then Taiwan is a "breakaway" province, since mainland China claims Taiwan as part of our territory. Just like Republic of China 🇹🇼 claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory according to my Map of ROC Administrative and Claims.
    3
  8951.  @augustuswoods4548  About alleged Tibet cultural genocide, here's a Canadian tourist visit to Lhasa and he took the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) and explains how each carriage comes equipped with its own emergency oxygen tank. Video: Welcome to Lhasa - Exploring the City (By Vafa Anderson) youtu.be/J-TfN56ETVM He remarks how much Lhasa has changed in 10 years since he last visited. Throughout the video you can see many religious people worshipping, praying, spinning those "prayer wheels" and performing full-body kowtows on the ground, so how exactly is Tibetan religion impacted?
    3
  8952.  @augustuswoods4548  Even New York Times Beijing bureau chief , Nicholas Kristof (that guy you mentioned earlier) says that there was no massacre inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989. At the very end of this long article, which purported to give an inside view of a debate within the Chinese Communist Party leadership, Kristof stated categorically: “Based on my observations in the streets, neither the official account nor many of the foreign versions are quite correct. There is no massacre in Tiananmen Square, for example, Source: workers.org/2011/world/tiananmen_0707/
    3
  8953.  @richarde.halliburton8022  "3. Gold is only useful for foreign exchange - and Mao was not interested in buying things" Chairman Mao bought tractors from Soviet Union as well as Soviet Union farming technology, so gold was valuable to China regardless. Chairman Mao's agrarian utopia was to seize the lands from the rich corrupt landlords and redistribute it among the dirt-poor peasants. For the first time, peasants could own land and not get taxed by the corrupt landlords and under Chairman Mao, peasant literacy rates improved, women could work in the fields or in the industries as well as gain access to education under Chairman Mao. The goal of the Great Leap Forward was to industrialise and modernise China. What? You wanted China to remain a dirt-poor agricultural country forever, instead of modernising and industrialising? The Great Leap Forward represented PRC's first attempt to industrialise and it paved the way for eventual industrialisation of China under Deng Xiaoping's late 1970s economic reforms. You keep saying that had KMT won, KMT would not repeat the Great Chinese Famine, but where do you get your confidence from? China suffered numerous famines during the ROC 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) rule, such as the 1920–1921 North China Famine, 1928–1930 Northern China Famine, 1936–1937 Sichuan-Gansu Famine, 1942–1943 Henan Famine, so the ROC has their fair share of famines, what makes you think had KMT won, they would avoid the Great Chinese Famine?
    3
  8954.  @augustuswoods4548  Tibetan language is part of the same Sino-Tibetan language family as Mandarin, Cantonese and other languages spoken in mainland China, so how is having different language a point for Tibet not being part of China? Source: Sino-Tibetan languages wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Tibetan_languages Different languages doesn't mean that the people aren't from the same country. Look at India and they are home to (perhaps) thousands of different dialects and languages such as Bengali, Hindi, Kashmiri, Sanskrit, Tamil, Urdu, etc, yet the people born in India are considered Indians.
    3
  8955.  @richarde.halliburton8022  4. "Taiwan has very little global presence… the reason is that China won't allow it to have one." Look, it was the United Nations countries that democratically voted in 1971 to recognise the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 as China and to kick Republic of China 🇹🇼 out of the UN Security Council. The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the UN General Assembly Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The poll results were as follows: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_2758 Since PROC 🇨🇳 won the vote with two-thirds majority, then the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, recognized the People's Republic of China (PRC) as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed the collective representatives of Chiang Kai-shek from the United Nations. So the UN countries literally democratically voted to recognise PRC as China, so how is PRC responsible for ROC loss in global presence? I mean, why did ROC lose the mainland to PRC and had to flee to Taiwan? Taiwan is responsible for their loss in global presence here. Also, Taiwan's biggest trading partner is mainland China, not the USA, but Taiwan is reliant on the USA for defence.
    3
  8956.  @augustuswoods4548  You said: "I am merely pointing out the illogic and dishonesty of your claims using parody and pointing out fact-based differences." So for you, it's parody, but for me, it's whataboutism? How am I illogical or dishonest? I've been citing sources to support my arguments and using logic to argue my points, but you're just claiming whataboutism and other fallacies. You said: "The fact remains that Liu Xiaobo would not have died under house arrest in America." Of course, because 刘晓波 Liu Xiaobo is a Chinese dissident so of course he will be treated differently in America than in China, what's your point? Just like I can say American dissidents like Snowden and Assange wouldn't be arrested in China, what's the point of bringing up the treatment of Country X's dissident in Country Y? Is this another of your parodies? Because it's certainly laughable when it comes to logic. Also, Liu Xiaobo died from cancer, which can happen to anyone, anytime, it doesn't necessarily mean that Liu will survive beyond his time, if he had been in America.
    3
  8957.  @richarde.halliburton8022  5. The reason why "Made in China" has outpaced "Made in Taiwan…" Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland? Taiwan is an example of a failed democracy, what does democracy even bring to the table in Taiwan?
    3
  8958.  @richarde.halliburton8022  I'm talking about Chiang kai-shek moving gold from Shanghai to Taipei between 1948 and 1949 (I clearly specified that) why are you talking about ROC moving gold to alternate capitals during the war with Japan? How does that justify Chiang transferring mainland gold reserves to Taiwan? The ROC 🇹🇼 has not amended it's constitution, it claims all of mainland China as part of it's territory, then why should PRC 🇨🇳 reciprocate? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang slaughtered thousands of communist party members, should the communist suddenly grant KMT their own portion of Chinese territory today? Why should PRC do that? So by Taiwan acknowledging that its part of China, you have shown that Taiwan is not independent (since there hasn't been any formal declaration of independence by Taiwan) and that Taiwan is part of China under their own un-amended constitution.
    3
  8959.  @jacksins1431  "神州 Shenzhou yes Actually western wealthy success also not by democracy for the People" Exactly. Western wealth and success was built upon the backs of African slavery, genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, occupation of their lands even till today, brutal colonisation of Asia (India, Hong Kong, Singapore) and African countries. Westerners today are rich, because they're sitting on a pile of wealth obtained from Africa, Asia, Australia and America. Not because of democracy.
    3
  8960.  @augustuswoods4548  "神州 Shenzhou Why are you mindlessly repeating your claims." You just reposted the same Nicolas Kristof article, even though he said tha there was no massacre in Tiananmen Square. "At the very end of this long article, which purported to give an inside view of a debate within the Chinese Communist Party leadership, Kristof stated categorically: “Based on my observations in the streets, neither the official account nor many of the foreign versions are quite correct. There is no massacre in Tiananmen Square,"
    3
  8961.  @augustuswoods4548  I've already admitted that Tibet wasn't part of China until 800 years ago, when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Tibetan language is part of the Sino-Tibetan language family as is Mandarin and other Chinese dialects. Also I've already disproven the fact that different languages doesn't mean different countries, using India as an example. Many other countries have multilingualism here's a list of multilingual countries and regions (of which China is one) Source: List of multilingual countries and regions wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_multilingual_countries_and_regions
    3
  8962.  @augustuswoods4548  Here's a video of modern day Lhasa, Tibet, China (filmed by WildFilmsIndia) and you can see how developed Lhasa has become under communist party rule. Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, and modern technology like cars, telephone cables, computers, smartphones, WiFi, the Internet, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like (By WildFilmsIndia) youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo Even the poorest Tibetan farmer can afford a smartphone, connect to the Internet and shop online in Taobao and have his purchases shipped all the way to Tibet in the Himalayas. Because Tibet is part of China after all.
    3
  8963.  @augustuswoods4548  You said: "gives no moral or logical legitimacy to the present-day" And I already responded with the Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. This is the modern justification and legitimacy, even today, countries all over the world recognise Tibet Autonomous Region as part of the People's Republic of China. Just draw the Map of China and Tibet is clearly part of China. Here's a Map of China: maps-of-the-world.net/maps/maps-of-asia/maps-of-china/detailed-special-economic-zones-map-of-china-1997.jpg As for dishonesty, we are talking about the Tiananmen Square Massacre and I've already cited numerous articles showing that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989. That is what we are talking about, the Tiananmen Square Massacre, isn't it? And you said Liu Xiaobo won't died under house arrest in America, which I said: "Of course, because Liu Xiaobo is a Chinese dissident, not an American dissident." so how am I missing the point? And Liu Xiaobo received medical treatment for his cancer, but still succumbed to cancer in the end, so what makes you think Liu Xiaobo would live beyond his time, had he been in America? I can also make the speculation that fugitives of America like Assange and Snowden won't be alive today, if they were in America today, what's the point of your argument? "Americans are not arrested for making arguments in favour of a different system of government." Likewise, Chinese are not arrested for making arguments in favor of a different system of government, for example: Anarchy, Fascism, Democracy, Soviet Democracy, Communism, Monarchy, Meritocracy, as long as they aren't trying to actively implement said system onto China. Whereas it's illegal to display the Nazi Flag in Germany, France, Austria, etc outside of historical context, nor the Communist Hammer and Sickle flag in former Soviet Union countries like Ukraine, Lithuania, Czech Republic. Source: Bans on Nazi flag wikipedia.org/wiki/Post%E2%80%93World_War_II_legality_of_Nazi_flags Source: Bans on Communist Symbols wikipedia.org/wiki/Bans_on_communist_symbols But in China, you can display the Nazi Flag or the Communist Hammer and Sickle flag, no problem.
    3
  8964.  @jacksins1431  Agreed, the USA is weaponizing the US Petrol Dollar, so when countries like Venezuela choose the Chinese Petrol Yuan over the US Dollar, the USA slap sanctions on Venezuela and cause food prices to skyrocket.
    3
  8965.  @richarde.halliburton8022  So Taiwan has zero major smartphone brands unlike the mainland? Besides smartphones, Chinese companies also dominate the civilian drone industry and Chinese company DJI is world's largest civilian drone-maker according to the following source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 top10drone.com/top-drone-companies/ But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland? Yet you still claim Taiwan is successful democracy, how?
    3
  8966.  @augustuswoods4548  And as I said, the Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet, this is the modern justification and legitimacy of China's claim. And I've already proven it by showing that countries all over the world recognise Tibet Autonomous Region as part of China using the map of China. We were talking about Tiananmen Square Massacre, and we have already come to the conclusion that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 (even Nicholas Kristof said so) so isn't this settled? "Were hundreds of Chinese citizens killed by the Chinese military/police in Beijing on July 3rd and 4th 1989? Yes or No?" Why are you trying to force me to choose one of two answers? This is a false dichotomy fallacy based on a premise that erroneously limits what options are available. Yes, you weren't saying people won't die of cancer in America, but you made the claim that Liu Xiaobo would not have died under house arrest in America (to which I replied because Liu was a Chinese dissident, not an American dissident). And in China, you aren't arrested just for arguing in favour of a different political system like Soviet democracy, Monarchy, Meritocracy, etc as long as you don't try to implement said system in China. In fact, China is the only country in the world to have multiple political systems (democracy and socialism with Chinese Characteristics) existing within our borders, through the One Country, Two Systems Policy. No Western democracy has such a system where multiple political systems exist within their borders.
    3
  8967.  @augustuswoods4548  Have you ever considered the possibility, that if not for censorship, peaceful non-violent words can erupt into violence one day in the future? That's what happened with the January 6th Capitol Hill riots in because Americans been fed a constant stream of anti-government content, that the election was rigged and stolen from Trump, and that erupted into the Jan 6th Capitol Hill riots. Like I said earlier, censorship is necessary because words can mislead and incite riots. Worst, just look at the sheer amount of fake news propagating in the West, because of uncontrolled media networks. Look at the Q-Anon cultists. Such freedom of speech allows fake news to spread rampant and sow division in American society. With the rise of freedom of speech, comes a corresponding decline in responsibility for what's being said. The rights infringed upon one another. The rights of religious people infringe on those who don't believe. The rights of LGBTQ infringe on those homophobes. The rights of pro-Trump infringe on those anti-Trump. The rights of the Left-wing infringe on those of the Right-wing. America has never been more divided than they are today, because of freedom of speech and fake news. Let's get this straight, China is not America, and America is not China. China doesn't want to be like America, neither does America want to be like China. So why are you trying to impose America's political system onto China then?
    3
  8968.  @augustuswoods4548  About quality and quantity of China's censorship, China benefit from what Eric Li calls, constructive opaqueness whereas the USA is suffering from destructive transparency. Look at the George Floyd incident for example, the propagation of the police footage on Western social media created the storm that's the BLM protests in America. China is not America neither is America China. China has a level of censorship that's beneficial to China and there isn't any need to alter it just to suit your preferences. Whereas the USA is in dire need of increasing its censorship, in my opinion.
    3
  8969.  @augustuswoods4548  "神州 Shenzhou Will the One Country, Two Systems policy continue perpetually then?" The Sino-British declaration is due to expire 50 years after the 1997 Hong Kong handover back to mainland China. So presumably by 2047, Hong Kong is expected to fully return back to China once the Sino-British declaration finally expires.
    3
  8970.  @richarde.halliburton8022  Besides smartphones and drones, China is home to many successful Internet companies like Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, Suning, Bytedance (Tik Tok), Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, Kuaishou, Trip, Pinduoduo, Sina Corp, Sohu, and many more Source: Wikipedia: List of largest Internet companies But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How does Taiwan even possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland? Yet you claim Taiwan is a successful democracy?
    3
  8971.  @richarde.halliburton8022  Here's video of Taiwan parliament fight, with parliament members throwing water balloons (they actually prepared those?) and furniture at each other. Video: Taiwanese parliament broke out into a water balloon and chair-throwing brawl youtu.be/mMvkusAI9DM So how is Taiwan a successful democracy? Look at China's Two Sessions (NPC and CPPCC) meeting in comparison. Video: Live: Special program on 2021 Two Sessions – China's top legislature, the National People's Congress youtube.com/watch?v=P8pQ24-HETY
    3
  8972.  @augustuswoods4548  "神州 Shenzhou Will Hong Kong's democracy persist beyond 2047?" The deal was that the Sino-British declaration expires 50 years after the 1997 handover, but who knows, maybe Beijing would allow the One Country, Two Systems Policy to continue beyond 2047. The point is that China is the only country in the world with a One Country, Two Systems Policy. Everywhere else in the world, it's One Country, One System, and ideally, China should return to One Country, One System some day in the future.
    3
  8973.  @richarde.halliburton8022  Mainland China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen and Taiwan's hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours.
    3
  8974.  @richarde.halliburton8022  China is home to many of the world's largest banks including ICBC, China Construction Bank, AgBank, Bank of China, Bank of Communications, Postal Savings Bank of China, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank (China), Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, China CITIC Bank, China Minsheng Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Hua Xia Bank, Bank of Beijing, China Guangfa Bank, Bank of Shanghai, Bank of Jiangsu, China Zheshang Bank and so on. Source: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks#By_total_assets But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    3
  8975.  @richarde.halliburton8022  Lose an argument? I'm still waiting for you to explain why you think the KMT can do a better job than the Communists, given their catastrophic failure to reunite the mainland during Chinese Civil War and the sheer KMT corruption and incompetence.
    3
  8976.  @richarde.halliburton8022  So why didn't ROC 🇹🇼 implement its land reform while KMT was in power during 1912-1949? Instead it was Chairman Mao and the communists who seized the lands from the corrupt landlords and redistributed it to the dirt-poor peasants? It was the KMT that taxed the peasants heavily, so what makes you think they would implement their reforms in the mainland? And numerous famines occurred under KMT rule, such as the 1920–1921 North China Famine, 1928–1930 Northern China Famine, 1936–1937 Sichuan-Gansu Famine, 1942–1943 Henan Famine, so what makes you think KMT would avoid the Great Chinese Famine? The historical evidence doesn't support your claim that KMT will do a better job than the Communists.
    3
  8977.  @richarde.halliburton8022  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, which country will disrespect their founding father? Chairman Mao and the communists succeeded in reunifying our divided country and chasing the foreign imperialists out of China, where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed to achieved for 37 years under Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949). When Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    3
  8978.  @richarde.halliburton8022  Also, the KMT's rule over Taiwan was authoritarian and single-party, they imposed 38 years of Martial Law on Taiwan (which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time) so what makes you think KMT would relinquished their authoritarian rule had they been the sole ruling party of mainland China? KMT only introduced democracy in Taiwan because the US government threatened to cut off US weapons sales to the Taiwan if KMT did not institute political reforms.
    3
  8979.  @richarde.halliburton8022  I dispute your last sentence ("But as we see in today's China, that is a common tactic for authoritarian regimes to remain in power regardless of the will or aspirations of the people.") because a recent long term Harvard University study has revealed that around 80-90 % of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China, so how is it against the will and aspirations of the people? A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. Source: Harvard survey finds Chinese satisfaction with govt rises china.org.cn/china/2020-07/17/content_76281590.htm
    3
  8980.  @richarde.halliburton8022  If you claim the public schools and years of propaganda has brainwashed our young, then likewise, shouldn't the youth in Taiwan be brainwashed by Taiwan education system, claiming that democracy is somehow superior? Historically, Taiwan was most economically prosperous under the authoritarian single-party rule of the KMT, only after democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off US weapons sales to Taiwan) in late 1990s that Taiwan's economy is stagnating under democracy. Which you have ascribed to as a mere "coincidence". From the way you speak, you're not even a Chinese citizen in Taiwan yourself isn't it? I already shown that under Taiwan's constitution, Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. I did not write Taiwan's constitution, they themselves choose to remain part of China, instead of declaring independence.
    3
  8981.  @kammonkam4905  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China, China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today. I mean, which country would disrespect their founding father like that?
    3
  8982.  @kammonkam4905  Whichever way you choose to classify those deaths, the fact remains that China prioritize saving the lives of elderly people through dynamic zero Covid policy. Can you imagine how worst the situation would be if Shanghai did not implement lockdown and just let the virus claim more lives of elderly people?
    3
  8983.  @kammonkam4905  "Was that Chinese Confucian value?" Mao Zedong was anti-Confucian, he had denounced it as regressive and feudal, so he encouraged going against Confucian principles during the Cultural Revolution. It's reminisce of the First Emperor of China, Qin Shihuangdi who favored Legalism and was against Confucianism and had buried Confucian scholars. But as thousands of years has shown, it's practically impossible to wipe out Confucianism in China, and it's principles survived long after Qin Dynasty. I thought you claim that you're a Chinese who had intimate knowledge of Chinese history, then shouldn't you already know this fact?
    3
  8984.  @jordandthornburg  Since we both know that it doesn't make sense to mix people who tested positive and negative together, then could it all be a huge misunderstanding or miscommunication? For example, could it be that the person thought he/she tested negative, when actually he/she tested positive? Or perhaps the test results haven't been updated, or perhaps the results differ from 2 different types of test (i.e Antigen Test vs PCR Test) maybe? I mean, there's a myriad of possible explanations, but why jump to such a conclusion (which even you admittedly said doesn't make sense)?
    3
  8985. Jack Ma was good when he puts the interests of others before himself, like when Ma uploaded Covid-19 prevention handbook and made it available to all. But when Jack Ma starts putting his own self-interests and those of his company, over the interests of Chinese people, then he needs to be taken down a notch.
    3
  8986. It's Canada and Mexico that were taken by surprise by Trump's tariffs. China has been preparing for additional tariffs since Trump's first term.
    3
  8987. Well, its true that Vivi isn't what most people would consider "attractive".
    3
  8988.  @zackk4969  "A Madman's Diary" 《狂人日記》 is a work of fiction. The author Lu Xun (鲁迅) was an avant-garde Chinese writer who was celebrated for his fictional works among one of which is “Diary of a Madman”, so why are you taking fiction as reality?
    3
  8989. Well, can you prove that other space stations in the universe exist apart from the ISS and Tiangong space station?
    3
  8990.  @davidleomorley889  "Democracy will eventually come to China also" But why should mainland China embrace Western democracy? China is the world's most populous country, so why should everyone in China vote? China's current political system has shown to be viable for our country, so is there really a need to adopt Western democracy? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    3
  8991.  @flamacue  Look at Hong Kong and before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule from 1841-1997, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before?
    3
  8992.  @davidleomorley889  Granted, the Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, Europe, USA and India. Source: china-profile(dot)com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    3
  8993.  @qingdaocitizen7957  You said: "Beijing who tried to hide the facts and let the virus spread to the nentire world." So if you're complaining that China silenced whistle-blowers and let Chinese travel across the world? But if China didn't silence whistle-blowers then even more people would have panicked and fled China today other parts of the world, so what do you propose China do? Let the whistle-blower cause panic in Wuhan and cause more people to flee from Wuhan?
    3
  8994.  @qingdaocitizen7957  Look at the difference in Covid-19 response. China is willing to sacrifice businesses to save lives through lockdown, whereas the USA is willing to sacrifice lives to save businesses by keeping their economy running even while Covid-19 is raging out of control in USA.
    3
  8995.  @rpg1663  ​ Which Chinese school are you referring to?
    3
  8996.  @AIBOT-TIFFANY  You said: "let me know when a single base gets overthrown please let me know i haven’t seen anything about that yet" Haven't you heard what happened to the US base in Afghanistan? Bagram Airfield was formerly the largest US military base in Afghanistan before it was overthrown.
    3
  8997. ​ @AIBOT-TIFFANY A gift? Wasn't it the first Trump administration that signed the 2020 US withdrawal deal from Afghanistan? The same administration today that you think will be completely different from previous administrations?
    3
  8998. The most salient thing is that Meng Wanzhou is finally released and put on the first flight back to China, after 3 long years since her arrest in 2018. The fine imposed on Huawei pales in comparison to what she's been through.
    3
  8999. Western political discourse is lacking in rational and sensible points, such as those put forth by Cyrus in this video.
    3
  9000. China is developing medical exoskeletons to help paraplegics regain the use of their legs.
    3
  9001.  @sara.cbc92  Taiwan also claims the Diaoyu Islands as well as the South China Sea Islands. In fact, Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of all the territory Taiwan claims (wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Han Chinese traditional clothing Hanfu (汉服) has 5,000 years of history and even the Japanese Kimono and Korean Hanbok clothing have their origins in Chinese Hanfu. Video: Beautiful Traditional Costume: Han Chinese Clothing (Hanfu) youtu.be/T6CucJxiWec?t=5
    3
  9002.  @sara.cbc92  Source No, the coronavirus wasn’t made in a lab. A genetic analysis shows it’s from nature sciencenews.org/article/coronavirus-covid-19-not-human-made-lab-genetic-analysis-nature
    3
  9003.  Le cerveau  I am simply pointing out the difference between an ad hominem attack and an insult that's all. The term "Son of a bi**h" here is an insult, not an ad hominem attack.
    3
  9004. Oftentimes, the news about social media websites leaking/selling user's information stems from Western social media like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter. Yet people continue to use those social media websites regardless of a history of data leaks.
    3
  9005.  @charleswomack2166  Challenging? She won't take NO for an answer, she just repeated different variations of the question: "Are you going to condemn Russia or not?" until she heard the words she wanted to hear. She kept interrupting the ambassador instead of listening to what he has to say.
    3
  9006. Ironically, many anti-China people will often accuse Daniel or Brian of being "well-paid communist party shills" even thought it's apparent that these people are self-sponsored.
    3
  9007. Didn't Wikileaks whistleblower Edward Snowden exposed that the US government monitor citizen conversations for keywords relating to terrorism?
    3
  9008.  @ngawangyoga9258  Here's video of Tibetan singer Alan 阿兰 singing song in both Tibetan and Mandarin. It's a beautiful song and it's thanks to modernity that we get to hear it. Video: alan 阿蘭(阿兰) - 青藏高原 Tibetan Plateau 藏/中文版 Tibetan and Chinese version (2020環球綜藝秀) youtu.be/jJfCI3FL9WI
    3
  9009.  @bhushanjss  Why can't China invest in those countries? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    3
  9010.  @bhushanjss  What about the Maldives, can you explain? I mean, China don't point gun and force other countries to borrow from our banks, other countries are always free to borrow from the IMF, if they choose to. But if developing countries want to borrow from our banks, then why can't Chinese banks loan money to these banks? Why should China consult the IMF before lending money to other countries? Who gives the IMF the right to dictate how much money Chinese banks loan total others? What "irresponsibility in spreading the coronavirus" are you talking about? China lockdown Wuhan in both domestic as well as international flights, except for chartered flights (by government to transport their citizens home) yet you're just blaming China for spreading the coronavirus? Except for chartered flights, no international passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since its lockdown on January 23, People's Daily learned exclusively from the Hubei Airport Group Company Source: No international commercial passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since lockdown: Airport authority news.cgtn.com/news/2020-07-11/No-international-passenger-flights-departed-from-Wuhan-since-lockdown-S2T0tDumyc/index.html
    3
  9011.  Ajay Singh  Even Indian PM Nehru had acknowledged that Tibet is part of China, why should China give up Tibet when even India recognised Tibet as part of China? You Indians complain about Pakistan Occupied Kashmir all the time, why not wrest control of Kashmir from Pakistan then?
    3
  9012.  @JaYoeNation  The earliest primitive humans learnt to skin animals for fur, creating the first human clothing to keep the ourselves warm. Skinning is part of human survival skills, as important as learning to make fire.
    3
  9013.  @perrytalledo5311  The Chinese labs already shared the Covid-19 genome with World Health Organization, before being ordered to close down. Closing down could be due to the improper handling procedures, possible leakage, or other factors, not because China is somehow trying to "silence" (because the information is already out, so what's the point?). It appears that you're just trying to blame Chinese authorities, when the Covid-19 genome information has already been sent to World Health Organization, so that other scientists across the world can continue to research.
    3
  9014. It's a combination of the "Red Scare" (fear of communism) and the "Yellow Peril" (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, Westerners have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-liberal democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many Westerners to fathom.
    3
  9015.  @josephtanhs  So even if Japanese salary man end their work early, their culture stops them from returning home to spend time with their families.
    3
  9016. Which forced labor camp allows recreational activities like painting? Which forced labor camp allows its people to go home during the weekends?
    3
  9017.  @ironlionzion1380  Taiwan island inalienable part of China, and the International Olympic Committee has agreed to only allow the island's athletes to participate under the banner of "Chinese Taipei" with no mention of the name Taiwan, nor showing of the ROC flag or playing of the ROC national anthem. That Taiwanese fan was carrying a banner mentioning Taiwan, which is illegal under IOC laws, and the French officials either didn't notice it (or perhaps ignored it altogether), which was why it was later snatched away. Mainland China will not tolerate message that support Taiwan's independence.
    3
  9018.  @kmrkodro  The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    3
  9019.  @raymondhoffman3587  It was Western Imperialism that imposed a form of Orwellian mind control onto the local populace of their colonies. Before the 1997 Hong Kong return to the mainland, Hong Kong was under the authoritarian rule of colonial Britain for over 150 years, during which the Hong Kong people did not enjoy democracy, and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong while it was still a British colony. In fact, there was only 1 election held near the end of British colonial rule just a few years before Hong Kong's 1997 handover back to the mainland.
    3
  9020.  @raymondhoffman3587  How is it a violation of Communist Party orders just to login to YouTube while in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so? And I'm saying that throughout the videos on the Hong Kong riots, the number of journalists wearing press vests outnumber the HKPF, yet despite the extensive journalistic coverage, many Westerners are still unaware of the full story, of the acts of violence committed by the Hong Kong protestors. There's been an abnormal amount of coverage on the protests in Hong Kong (compared to say the ongoing protest in France) it just goes to show that some reporters in Hong Kong have an agenda of their own.
    3
  9021.  @jw7518  Yeah, I've exchanged a few rounds with another user Current Channel. Same old rhetoric too, like this C Channel guy.
    3
  9022. ​ @storage4539  I had never mentioned anything about defining police brutality, all I said was there was 0 deaths by HKPF, so how is that HKPF dehumanizing the protestors when there were 0 deaths? Even by the Shenzhen police, Cheng did not die, whereas you can't say the same for African Americans like George Floyd, Ahmaud Abery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks among others. I noticed that throughout your comments, not once did you even bother to mention the victim's names, you just call her the Shenzhen woman (even though I mentioned her name). Even when you talk about the U.S police, you never bothered to bring up the African American's names, it's like you're dehumanizing those people, yet how many times have you brought up the Shenzhen police case, time and time again, even though Cheng had survived? It's like you're not interested in the Shenzhen police case, as long as you can seemingly use it to malign China that's all. And since you admit that the grey-shirt guy is not a Hong Kong policeman, that means, you have no proof of PLA soldiers being disguised as a Hong Kong policeman. I mean, there are PLA troops stationed in Hong Kong (since after the 1997 handover) so what's the big deal in the video? We already know that the guy in grey is not from HKPF, so why'd you claim earlier that there were PLA soldiers disguised as Hong Kong police?
    3
  9023.  @MarkYeung1  North Korea did a good job controlling the coronavirus infections in the country, that much can't be denied, compared to America's horrible handling of Covid-19.
    3
  9024.  @grandwonder5858  Excellent point. But it's a pity that most replies on this comment thread have been censored.
    3
  9025.  @larryp6671  You said: "Not profit driven economies? You are joking, right?" We are already witnessing this behavior, with China willing to lockdown the Shanghai and Beijing economies in order to curb further spread of the virus. In Russia, Putin also recently announced a 10% rise in pensions and the minimum wage for Russian workers. Hopefully this dispels the notion that China and Russia have profit driven economies.
    3
  9026. +TheNinjaDC Look at India, the world's largest democracy. As world's 2nd most populous country, India has comparable work force to China. Republic of India was founded in 1947 whereas People's Republic of China was founded 2 years later. Many Indians speak English (more attractive to Westerners) while most Chinese still struggle with English even today. India has free market, while China's market is still rather closed off. India had all the above advantages, and China held all the disadvantages, yet China has long overtaken India in many fields. China is world's 2nd largest economy, while India is world's 7th. China has literacy rate of 96% while India has 71% literacy. China has lower corruption index than India. China has Global Hunger Index of 6(low) while India has 31(serious). China has poverty rate of 2% while India's poverty rate is 12%. India has 5 times more people living in modern slavery as compared to China. So why should China adopt democracy, when it hasn't worked out well for India, the world's largest democracy? Not every country in the world has to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of that.
    3
  9027. Tide Pods Even the United Nations decided to kick Republic of China (Taiwan) out of the UN Security Council and recognize the People's Republic of China as China's successor.
    3
  9028.  @Andy-P  You said: "CCP said they will invade unless Taiwan surrenders." That's an untrue statement. The CPC will only resort to the military option if Taiwan formally declares independence, otherwise, the CPC is committed to peaceful reunification of Taiwan. Even right now, there is currently no outbreak of war in the Taiwan Strait.
    3
  9029.  @realgood537  If you are refering to Keriya Aitika Mosque, then it wasn't destroyed, and the prayer room remained intact together with the South Gate, while the North Gate was demolished. The prayer room is a protected cultural heritage, but the North Gate was “rebuilt” during 1997–1998.
    3
  9030. Greater China is literally the world's largest exporter of integrated circuits. Here's a list of countries/states by integrated circuit exports in 2019: 1. Hong Kong, China ($134,483 million) 2. Mainland China ($102,187 million) 3. Taiwan, China ($100,408 million) 4. South Korea ($79,082 million) 5. Singapore ($76,868 million) 6. Malaysia ($44,794 million) 7. United States ($40,099 million) 8. Japan ($27,791 million) 9. Vietnam ($26,084 million) 10. Philippines ($18,991 million) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by integrated circuit exports
    3
  9031. You're always welcome to overthrow your masters by getting rid of your phone.
    3
  9032. Although NASA is forbidden by US government from cooperating with CNSA (Chinese NASA), but China will let NASA have a look at our moon soil samples for study purposes.
    3
  9033.  @Andy-P  Lack of reciprocity? Did I not mention the top ten Italian brands that Chinese consumers are buying? So if Chinese are buying Italian goods, then the reason for any deficit could be because it's Italians are buying far more Made-in-China goods.
    3
  9034.  @Andy-P  China Imports from Italy was $26.98 Billion during 2022, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade, so it's certainly not from a lack of reciprocity on Chinese consumers part.
    3
  9035.  thulomanchay  Taiwan was even listed as a destination in Pelosi's itinerary, she literally had to sneak into Taiwan. Also, had she expressed her support from Washington, it would be seen by China as a U.S breach of the One China Policy either way.
    3
  9036.  thulomanchay  Oops, my mistake. Taiwan wasn't listed on Pelosi's itinerary.
    3
  9037.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Weren't you the one who mentioned Poland sending MiGs to Ukraine and also mentioned Ukrainians needing stinger missiles (i.e air-defense missiles)? And what are you accusing me of deflecting and redirecting, when even Zelenskyy himself lamented that Ukraine has been abandoned, since NATO aren't sending troops to defend Ukraine, as well as USA refusing to impose a no-fly zone over Ukraine? Go call up Zelenskyy and take your argument to him. Tell Zelenskyy that Ukraine has not been abandoned like you keep telling me here. Or better still, put your words into actions by signing up with the Ukrainian military yourself, since they are now accepting foreign recruits to fight in defense of Ukraine.
    3
  9038.  @dennisking4233  Scott Morrison has even hatched a scheme for Australia to buy U.S weapons to send to Ukraine. Even though Australia is struck by massive flooding at the moment.
    3
  9039.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Scott Morrison is getting Australians to fork out money to buy U.S weapons to send to Ukraine, all while Australia is suffering from floods.
    3
  9040.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Floods affect Australian's lives directly, why not allocate those funds for flood relief in Australia, rather support the U.S military-industrial complex? Ukraine is basically a lost cause, since NATO is not going to send troops to defend Ukraine. Ukraine's application to join NATO is unlikely to succeed, because it would mean NATO is obliged to send reinforcements to defend Ukraine, and I can't see that happening. So what for Australians waste their money buying U.S weapons to send to Ukraine, when it could be better spent as flood relief back home? Also, have you called Zelenskyy and told him that Ukraine has not been abandoned like you keep telling me here? Or better still, put your words into actions by signing up with the Ukrainian military yourself, since they are now accepting foreign recruits to fight in defense of Ukraine.
    3
  9041.  @Carbuncle0168  NATO and America aren't even willing to send troops to defend Ukraine (neither are they willing to impose a No-Fly Zone over Ukraine) so what makes you think NATO and USA will be willing to go to war with mainland China (their biggest trading partner) over Taiwan island? Your statement is basically a pipe dream, given NATO's and USA's unwillingness to help Ukraine. More people in Taiwan need to wake up and realise that USA doesn't care about Taiwan, as long as they can use Taiwan as a pawn to contain the mainland's rise. The USA mainly wants to sell outdated but expensive U.S weapons to Taiwan as a form of "protection money", but based on their unwillingness to put boots on the ground in Ukraine, most likely the USA is going to abandon Taiwan like they did for Afghanistan and now Ukraine.
    3
  9042.  @jaimemartinez9792  The Communist Party of China is what ensures that the big corporations don't get away with all that power. In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, building hi-speed rail infrastructure and undercharging customers so that we can enjoy low travel fares. In the United States, the US corporations control the U.S government for war and profit, waging wars in the Middle East to control the oil prices for example, and to justify the insane US defence budget. So-called "think tanks" are funded by actual "tank-makers" themselves, spreading fear and paranoia towards China, so that other countries purchase more US arms.
    3
  9043. In China, the Chinese gov't controls the corporations for China's benefit, reining in companies when they strayed too far. In the U.S the rich corporations control the U.S gov't for war and profit at the expanse of ordinary Americans.
    3
  9044.  The Truth Is Out 777  China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020, China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    3
  9045.  @MarkYeung1  I actually believe the opposite is true, that China's crackdown on anti-competitive practices on Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, actually helps competition in China by "freeing up space" so that smaller companies can emerge to cater to the market. Look at American monopolies like Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, and they "gobble up" competition from smaller American firms, thus stifling innovation through competition in the process.
    3
  9046.  @tomasstride9590  You said: "Just looking at the video it did look to me as though he was reluctant to leave and was being gently coerced into moving." That's the expected behavior that a man with frail health being told to leave for the benefit of his health would behave. Hu Jintao is 79 years old (same age as Joe Biden) and even when he entered the People's Hall, he had to be escorted to his chair.
    3
  9047.  @tomasstride9590  Hu Jintao actually had the honor of sitting directly next to President Xi Jinping in the People's Hall, isn't this a sign that Xi holds Hu in high regard, as well as a show of respect from him?
    3
  9048.  @mfmf100  Cantonese is also spoken in mainland like in Guangdong province too. And how exactly are Hong Kong culture and traditions different from the mainland? They celebrate Spring Festival (Chinese New Year) Dragonboat Festival, Lantern Festival and other Chinese festivals too isn't it?
    3
  9049.  @rpg1663  China is the 5G leader primarily in terms of infrastructure. For example, China completed the world's first 5G remote surgery, where a doctor removed the liver of a laboratory test animal at a remote location, by controlling robotic surgical arms over a 5G connection. The lag time lag was said to be only 0.1 seconds between the doctor’s control device and the robot in the surgical room.
    3
  9050. For many years, imposed sanctions on North Korea has had little effect on its government, so why do these people expect China's actions to have any appreciable effect? Remember that NK is nuclear capable country, and our government does not want provocative actions that would drive N. Korea over the edge. War in peaceful East Asia would set our growing economies and development back by decades and would not be in East Asia's interest.
    3
  9051. brown bobby Actually, many countries always threatened to boycott Chinese goods altogether, but in the end, demand for Chinese goods remains high and nobody follow through with their threats. USA can choose blockade our goods, but they can't stop Japan and S. Korea from trading with China if they want to.
    3
  9052. Genda Minoru Chinese workers are still being paid for their work, so why accuse it being slave labor? Our quality may not be top notch, but it is reasonable quality for the price, such that global demand for Chinese products remains constant. They may not be Chinese goods exactly, but they are unmistakably Chinese products, which is why they have "Made in China" or "Product of China" labels on them. Intellectual Property rights in China was not as established as USA initially, because Chinese markets were still getting used to capitalism back then. The IP rights today are much better than it was before, but still not like the Western standards. Regardless, if companies want setup shop in China, then obviously they need to adhere Chinese regulations within China.
    3
  9053. Daniel Vedberg Sekulic "yet its prusumptous to think the roles whouldnt be reversed if the chinese won in 1896" As far as I know, China has never invaded Japan (Mongolians tried to, but failed) because Japan lacks the natural resources, whereas Chinese territories (like Manchuria) is rich in resources, which is why Japan has been invading China historically. Japanese forces led by Toyotomi Hideyoshi invaded Korea in 1592 for the purpose of conquest, and the Ming dynasty Emperor dispatched Chinese troops to Korea (Joseon dynasty) to help them repel the invaders. Next Japan invaded Korea in 1894 during 1st Sino-Japanese war against Qing dynasty, and captured Korea and Taiwan. Then we have 2nd Sino-Japanese war in 1931 (shown by the uploader). So according to history, China has never shown interest in invading Japan, whereas Japan has made numerous attempts at conquering Asia, because Japan lacks the necessary resources that China has.
    3
  9054.  @dongshengdi773  "神州 Shenzhou CCP owns 60% of Bitcoin supply for mining it for 10 years already." While it may be true that 60% of the world's Bitcoin mining happened in China, that doesn't mean that the Communist Party of China (CPC) owns it. In fact, it's the CPC that has declared all transactions of crypto-currencies are illegal, effectively banning digital tokens such as Bitcoin, and is cracking down on illegal Bitcoin mining, for reasons I outlined above, such helping criminals launder money, and hacker's ransom being paid in Bitcoin to make it hard to trace them. Additionally, the computers needed for bitcoin mining eat up a ton of computing power and electricity, raising concerns about the cost to the environment.
    3
  9055.  @Grenadier311  China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries seemed to have squandered the headstart that China bought them. Why did so many countries watch the epidemic unfold for weeks as though it was none of their concern? Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    3
  9056.  @Grenadier311  China isn't closing our borders completely, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs have decided to temporarily suspend entry of foreigners with currently valid visas and residency permits in China. Video: Coronavirus: China bans most foreign arrivals to block imported cases of Covid-19 youtu.be/2G5wy39zHZc The order does not apply to foreigners who: -hold diplomatic, service or courtesy or C Visas. -come to China for essential economic, trade, scientific or technological activities or out of emergency humanitarian needs -hold visa issued after the announcement. So its not closing off our borders completely.
    3
  9057. It's a sad state of affair if customers are only buying Apple phones because of the brand itself, not because of specs, performance, and other criteria.
    3
  9058.  @MarkYeung1  "Mark Japan not supporting the war will cost u up to 15 years in jail in Russia. So you know how valid the 70 percent is." So you're saying that the 30% of Russians polled that did not support the military operation were jailed? If that was really the case then why isn't it 100% of Russian polled supporting the war, instead of just 70%?
    3
  9059.  @FAILkipedia  Russia's defence ministry insisted it did not use the type of Tochka-U missile that was fired, whereas the Ukrainian military did. And the "For the Kids" message sounds like a false flag operation.
    3
  9060.  @FAILkipedia  Where's your evidence of rape? Russia actually requested a investigation into the events in Buca but the request was turned down by UK in the UN Security Council
    3
  9061.  @DeBeard  Agreed. Especially |ethnic Russians living in America already face discrimination. Russian athletes are banned from Olympics and Russian sportsmen forced to denounce their motherland or else. Russian musicians, composers, dancers, artists are being ostracized if they refuse to denounce their motherland. Some freedom of speech. Probably many Chinese are thinking the same thing is going to happen to Chinese and other Asians living in the West (if it isn't happening already).
    3
  9062.  @fclopez1  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    3
  9063. @mav Where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? If not, then since there's no amendment's to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    3
  9064. North Korea doesn't threaten Chinese cities, only USA military bases in South Korea, Okinawa Japan and Guam. Why should China get involved in this conflict between USA, NK and SK? China can at most act as mediator between these countries in conflict.
    3
  9065.  @catherineanderson7460  Source: Polls show only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/2156237/what-would-us-do-if-beijing-decided-take-taiwan-force
    3
  9066. 15:24 "If China and the United States went to a conflict, the United States would easily win that." I disagree with this claim. The mighty United States Army just lost a 20-year war in Afghanistan against a bunch of insurgents in Afghanistan, so it shows that just because you have a higher military spending doesn't necessarily mean your country will win the war.
    3
  9067.  @ualaw77  "The US wouldn't tolerate Soviet nukes in Cuba, but Cuba remained a Soviet ally until the collapse of the USSR because independent countries may form defensive alliances with whomever they please." What defensive alliance did Cuba join? Cuba remained a Soviet ally but Cuba was not a member of the Warsaw Pact. Because the US wouldn't tolerate Cuba joining the Warsaw Pact, much like how Russia won't tolerate Ukraine joining Nato. And to make it clear, Nato is not a defensive alliance, they bombed Yugoslavia in 1999 even though Yugoslavia did not attack any Nato member and Article 5 was not activated.
    3
  9068.  @oleksii_klochko  "Shenzhou. Fact is that NATO rejected Ukraine." Why not put that down on paper? That's what Russia is asking for; a formal assurance that Ukraine will not join Nato that's all. But for decades, Russia's words have fallen on deaf ears in the West as Nato continued to expand eastwards right up to Russia's territory, presenting an existential threat to Russia.
    3
  9069.  @oleksii_klochko  Here's the timeline: -On 23 December 2014, the Ukrainian parliament renounced Ukraine's non-aligned status, -On 20 September 2018 the Ukrainian parliament approved amendments to the constitution that would make the accession of the country to NATO and the EU a central goal and the main foreign policy objective. -On 7 February 2019 the Ukrainian parliament voted with a majority of 334 out of 385 to change the Ukrainian constitution to help Ukraine to join NATO and the European Union. So it was clearly Ukraine's intention to join Nato, even going so far as to amend their constitution.
    3
  9070.  @JimLecka  Had international agreements been adhered to, then Nato would have honored its promise not to expand eastwards, right up to Russia's doorstep. One of the conditions for the USSR's dissolution in 1991 was that Nato would remain as it was, without further expansion. But Nato has expanded into 14 countries since USSR's dissolution. Normally, this won't be a problem if Russia was permitted to join Nato. But Nato rejected Russia's application, yet continued to expand around Russia, which led to Russia viewing Nato expansion as an existential threat. For decades, the Russian President's words have fallen on deaf ears in the West, as they refuse to consider Russia's situation. In the end, Russia had no choice but to act.
    3
  9071.  @JimLecka  It wasn't a formal written agreement, but it was agreed upon verbally. It began with German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher in Tutzing, announced on January 31, 1990 that among other things, called on NATO to unequivocally state: "no matter what happens in the Warsaw Pact countries, there will be no expansion of NATO territory to the east, that is, closer to the borders of the Soviet Union." 10 days after his speech in Tutzing, Genscher repeated his words in an interview with Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze: "It is clear to us that membership in NATO creates difficult problems. However, one thing is clear to us: NATO will not expand to the east." 2 days later, Genscher repeats the statement at a press conference with Baker in Washington: "As I said, NATO has no intentions of expanding to the east." This became the basis for negotiations with USSR. James Baker stated that the United States was striving for a united Germany that would remain "firmly tied to NATO," promising at the same time "iron guarantees that NATO jurisdiction or forces would not move eastward." Baker's assurances were echoed by a number of other officials.
    3
  9072.  @JimLecka  "2) The major reason for Nato expansion is fear of Russian aggression." Russia is NOT the Soviet Union. NATO was formed in response to the rise of Soviet military might, but after the USSR dissolution in 1991, NATO no longer serves any interests and should have been disbanded as well. But instead NATO continued to expand eastwards, into 14 countries right up to Russia's doorstep. Being a European country itself, Russia had wanted to join NATO to join in the defense of the region, but NATO flat out rejected Russia's entry, yet continued to surround Russia. Who else was NATO targeting if not Russia? It's for these reason that Russia has no choice but to view NATO expansion as an existential threat.
    3
  9073.  @JimLecka  "3) the Russian mind is basically Imperialist, still in fear of a Mongol invasion" That's the Western mind you're describing. Look, even the WSJ compared the Russian President to Genghis Khan, depicting him dressed as a Mongol warrior, featured in the WSJ article titled: Russia’s Turn to Its Asian Past. (dated July 6, 2018). All this even though Russia is an European country, the West still subconsciously view them as Asians. You said: "The Soviets burned 20-40 % of GDP on military, including a navy which was a simple waste, unless the Soviets planned to attack the west." American warships were literally sailing from across the other side of the globe, crossing the vast Pacific Ocean to Soviet waters, yet you're saying the Soviet navy is a simple waste? Not the US Navy? Had the Soviet truly wanted to attack the West, they most likely would have gone through the land route, since the USSR had the most tanks of any other country in the world, rather than the sea route. The sea route is the US's choice when it comes to engagements, and that's why the Soviets needed a navy for defense.
    3
  9074.  @ualaw77  You said countries cannot dictate other countries joining "defensive alliances". Then which "defensive alliance" did Cuba join? Answer: None. Cuba didn't even join Warsaw Pact. Because the US won't tolerate Cuba joining such a miltary alliance. Likewise, Russia will not tolerate Ukraine joining a military alliance like NATO, because it poses an existential threat to Russia. Don't you even know what you mean by "defensive alliance" on the first place? I've never compared NATO bombing of Yugoslavia to Russia's special military operation. I simply pointed out that NATO is not a defensive alliance, since Yugoslavia did not attack any NATO member and Article 5 wasn't activated. Yet Yugoslavia was bombed by NATO in 1999, which goes to show that NATO can attack any country it pleases, regardless of whether it was in self-defence. Given such a situation, of course Russia would not allow Ukraine (it's neighbor) to join NATO. Much like US would not tolerate Cuba joining the Warsaw Pact for the same reason.
    3
  9075.  @ualaw77  The German foreign minister and James Baker made a verbal promise that NATO would not expand eastward, yet NATO expanded into 14 countries, right up to Russia's doorstep. Would the US tolerate Cuba joining the Warsaw Pact? Of course not and neither will Russia with Ukraine joining NATO. For decades, Russia's concerns have fallen on deaf ears in the West, until Russia had no choice but to launch the special miltary operation.
    3
  9076.  @SpiritsBB  The separation is not permanent, and they will be reunited once they graduate from school. By then, they would have proper Chinese education and a much better future in China, having access to more job opportunities.
    3
  9077.  @abuameen435  In the West, Muslims aren't assimilating to their host country's culture and instead they are slowly remaking these Western countries into their own. Look this American's reaction to the building of a mosque in Spotsylvania County, Virginia. Video: youtube.com/watch?v=INy4gaUrCL4 China is not allowing Muslims to step all over our country's laws, like they do in Western countries. We are teaching Uighurs in Xinjiang (whom are Chinese citizens by birth) to put China 1st and their religion 2nd. We are telling them to put China above their God/Allah.
    3
  9078.  The Racial Observer  Again, if you claim Taiwan is independent, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations? Is there some force that's preventing Taiwan from joining the UN like an independent country can?
    3
  9079.  @christopherhamlin6139  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwan is as independent as the US says it is" The U.S currently recognize the One China Policy that Taiwan as part of China, what are you talking about?
    3
  9080.  The Racial Observer  "神州 Shenzhou When is the invasion?" What invasion? When is NATO going to get involved in Ukraine?
    3
  9081.  The Racial Observer  "神州 Shenzhou China is in decline" I think you meant that the U.S is in decline and China is rising. Many experts predict that China's economy is expected to overtake the U.S economy some day in the foreseeable future.
    3
  9082.  @Rubbersofree  "What about Taiwan? What about refuse not to condemn Russia?" Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. And India refused to condemn Russia are you going to take it up with them?
    3
  9083.  @Rubbersofree  Here's the breakdown of which countries own Sri Lanka's debt in 2017 -39% Market Borrowings -14% Asian Development Bank -12% Japan -11% World Bank -10% China -2% India -11% Other ... Source: Ministry of Finance, Sri Lanka, as of the end of 2017 So how is it the CPC's fault that Sri Lanka become bankrupt? 90% of Sri Lanka's debt is owned by the West (including Japan and India).
    3
  9084.  @christopherhamlin6139  You said: "Specifically, On 12 July 2016, an independent arbitral tribunal established under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) published a clear and binding ruling on China’s claims vis-à-vis the South China Sea." What's the name of this independent arbitral tribunal and are you sure it is an official UN agency? Give me the name of this arbitral tribunal so that I can look it up.
    3
  9085.  @noobacegamer6255  "I do not agree how not being able to join the world alliance means not being a country." The why is it athletes from Taiwan can only participate in the Olympics under the banner of "Chinese Taipei"? It just goes to show that Taiwan is not independent.
    3
  9086.  @noobacegamer6255  and a sincere good luck to the heatwave sweeping across Europe, inflation and rising gas and fuel prices, resignation of leaders, and the general decline of the West. Europe is a great region. A sincere good luck to the majority of people living in Europe and not these internet keyboard warriors.
    3
  9087.  @noobacegamer6255  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: Wikipedia: White Terror (Taiwan) But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Source: Wikipedia: Taiwan Miracle Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    3
  9088.  @noobacegamer6255  "神州 Shenzhou then your English must suck if you do not see a question" There is no question mark (?) in any of your previous comments so what question did you ask? Instead you resort to mocking my English proficiency when there is no question of yours to be answered?
    3
  9089.  @noobacegamer6255  "神州 Shenzhou this conversation will never end if you never wanted to make sense from the beginning" But I have been making sense right from the beginning, I use reasoning and logic, citing sources to support my arguments where appropriate. Whereas it appears you asked "invisible questions" and somehow berate me for not being able to see them.
    3
  9090.  @christopherhamlin6139  You said: "Do you think the Spratly and Paracel islands are clearly in China's own waters? Because Vietnam doesn't think so." North Vietnam PM Pham Van Dong had formally accepted that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese. He even acknowledged it in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. The diplomatic letter is available for viewing on Wikipedia. Source: Wikipedia: File:1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai
    3
  9091.  @christopherhamlin6139  "When did the Socialist Republic of Vietnam become a country? (hint) it was long after 1958)" I typed your question into Google and it terns out Vietnam was founded on 2 September, 1945 when Hồ Chí Minh read the Proclamation of Independence of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam in Ba Đình flower garden, now known as Ba Đình square, officially creating the Democratic Republic of Vietnam.
    3
  9092.  @andrenogueira5058  "神州 Shenzhou Unfortunately, letters between presidents do not constitute treaties or equate to sovereign exchanges. I wrote a letter to my grandma saying that China is mine..." But you and your grandma aren't presidents, whereas I already cited the diplomatic letter that Vietnam PM Pham wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou, yet you just dismiss it because you cannot refute my point?
    3
  9093.  @everythingandmore5537  About "forced labour", the Uighurs drive cotton-harvesting tractors ( youtu.be/ocVn5Cn101M ) harvesting truckloads of cotton in Xinjiang, yet Western allegations of forced labour in Xinjiang cotton still persist?
    3
  9094.  @everythingandmore5537  So where's your evidence of actual forced labour in Xinjiang cotton? Around 70-80% of Xinjiang cotton is harvested by machines, where's your evidence of forced labour in Xinjiang cotton?
    3
  9095.  @intothewrx  How is China not respecting the Two Systems? Hong Kong currently have their own government separate from the mainland and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections, it's the Hong Kongers who elect their own government. So how did China not respect the two systems?
    3
  9096.  @MarkYeung1  Western countries have been polluting the planet since 200-300 years ago back when the Industrial Revolution began in 1700s-1800s. China in comparison only industrialized some 40 years ago in comparison.
    3
  9097.  @currentchannel3452  "(VPN) is a crime in China subject to 500 Yuan fine and up to 15 days in jail." Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so? There are so many foreign companies that come to China and set up shop here, and many of them require access to Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc, so the government issue VPN license to these companies to operate VPN, so how is VPN a crime in China?
    3
  9098.  @ChicagoTurtle1  According to Statista: Cumulative CO2 emissions worldwide 1750-2019, by country the United States emitted the most CO2 when you factor in the Industrial Revolution (1750) period. Cumulative carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel combustion worldwide from 1750 to 2019, by major country 1. United States (410.24 billion metric tons) 2. China (219.99 billion metric tons) 3. Russia (113.88 billion metric tons) 4. Germany (91.98 billion metric tons) 5. United Kingdom (77.84 billion metric tons) ... Source: Statista: Cumulative CO2 emissions worldwide 1750-2019, by country
    3
  9099.  @command_unit7792  Parts of Siberia had been originally part of China before it was ceded to Russia. For example, Vladivostok (Russian: Владивосто́к) was historically Chinese and was known as Hǎishēnwǎi (海參崴). Outer Manchuria that is currently part of Russia, had formerly belonged to a series of Chinese dynasties, including the Tang, Liao, Jin, Eastern Xia, Yuan, Northern Yuan, Ming, Later Jin, and Qing dynasties. As for the stereotyping of Asian women, you may not find it negative, but some Asian women do though. Even at 3:30 her reaction was: "WHAT!?"
    3
  9100. About Capitalism vs Communism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    3
  9101.  @user-nj4hn2ft5q  Why are you copying Cyrus Janssen's profile picture and username?
    3
  9102.  @amg5656  The withdrawal of Russian forces from the Kiev region is a gesture of goodwill to create favourable conditions for Russia-Ukraine talks said Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov. ... (Source: Business Standard)
    3
  9103.  @MarkYeung1  神州 Shenzhou Long term wise, ostracism from the west will mean fewer buyers for Russia's export. Russia exports essential commodities like oil and gas, wheat, metals and fertilizers. Russia is the largest wheat exporter in the world, which means that Westerners might face a possible bread shortage if they continue ostracizing Russia. Russia is world's 2nd largest exporter of cobalt (key element used in rechargeable batteries) and vanadium (used in large-scale energy storage and in steelmaking). The West is literally shooting themselves in the foot by sanctioning Russia. Which other countries are increasing production of oil? OPEC has barely increased their oil production. And the seizing of 600 billion of Russian assets is basically daylight robbery by the West, it discourages investors from storing their reserves in Western banks that can just seize them at anytime.
    3
  9104.  @MarkYeung1  Again, you're using the fallacy where you just copy what one country is capable of doing, and then somehow paste it onto another country, ignoring all manner of other factors. Lithuania can afford to do so, but in Germany case, they are continuing to buy Russian gas because if they switch to LNG, their production costs are going to increase and this will make German goods more pricey and less competitive in the global market. It's the fallacy where you compare apples and oranges (false dichotomy) where you claim just because Lithuania can do it, that the whole EU can do it and ignore all other factors.
    3
  9105. So because being poor in the West is earning ten times as much per day, at least in your country, means China and India are somehow worst off? Many people in Western countries grew up never having to go hungry, or worry about invasion from other countries, but does that mean Westerners can just despise other countries which have faced poverty and the real possibility of invasions before? Both Chinese and Indian people knew what it is like to go hungry, to have country divided by internal civil war, because Westerners want to control our societies. So why can't our countries build up our own defenses against foreign invasion? You want to compare Western living standards with China and India, just to look down on our countries progress is that it?
    3
  9106.  @wkrapek  I get that you're with the minority who voted for Hagia Sophia. The majority voted for the Great Wall.
    3
  9107.  @larrythao1414  You said: "Democracy means that people get to run regardless of ideas and views that they have." That's not true, democracy is a form of government in which the people have the authority to choose their governing legislation. Where does it say that "democracy" means that people get to run regardless of ideas and views that they have? Say for example if a US candidate is promoting Hawaiin independence from the USA, he or she might get disqualified.
    3
  9108.  @Andrew-ib7gs  Hong Kong clearly have their own government separate from the mainland and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections. That's already a huge jump from back when Hong Kong was British colony for 150 years, during which people of Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy. If the voters are pro-Beijing, then it's their choice, because Hong Kong is heavily dependent on the mainland for water, food and electricity. About 70% of Hong Kong's water demand is met by importing water from the Dongjiang River in neighbouring Guangdong province in the mainland. Hong Kong electrical grid is interconnected with the China Southern Power Grid of Mainland China. Hong Kong imports 23% of its total electricity needs from the mainland. Source: Water supply in Hong Kong wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_supply_and_sanitation_in_Hong_Kong Source: Electricity sector in Hong Kong wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_Hong_Kong#Interconnection_with_China
    3
  9109.  @Andrew-ib7gs  Look at prosperous Shenzhen in the mainland, just across from Hong Kong and Shenzhen’s economic growth surpassed Hong Kong's in 2017. Source: Shenzhen surpasses US$338 billion GDP mark in 2017, beats Hong Kong and Singapore’s growth scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2128310/shenzhen-88-cent-hi-tech-growth-roll-hit-y2tr-2017 Shenzhen is roughly the same economic size as Singapore and Hong Kong, but recorded nominal output of 2.2 trillion yuan (US$338 billion) in 2017 thanks to its booming hi-tech sector. Over 40% of the output came from “innovative” businesses such as internet, biotech and telecom. And that's despite Shenzhen being under communist party rule, while Hong Kong is suffering under its own democratic government.
    3
  9110. Meanwhile, Canada singlehandedly pissing off 3 of BRICS countries, first by detaining China's Huawei CFO, then slapping sanctions on Russia, and now expelling Indian diplomats.
    3
  9111.  @creddesignmatters6855  I have been answering your relentless questions, to the best of my ability, but all you done is mock my answers as "too nice to be true" then why are you being condescending towards me? You answered none of my questions, yet you constantly demand answers out of me? Who do you think you are? I have explained briefly how the Communist Party of China functions, yet you just throw the same questions after I answered them? This video goes into detail about who joins the CPC. Video: Who joins the Communist Party of China? youtu.be/zdhnoYg93mw I quoted a Harvard University study showing around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China, yet you're response is to give your own anecdotal evidence? And not even about China, you give anecdotes about Soviet Nations. Well, China is not the Soviet Union so why are you bringing up your own personal stories about the Soviet Union nations when I quoted Harvard University study on Chinese citizens? This is a strawman fallacy, isn't it? And since you brought up the Soviet Union, back in 1917, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe at that time, filled with starving peasants and poor workers, under the rule of the corrupt Tsar and Russia was technologically backward compared to the richer, developed Western European countries. After the Communist Revolution however, the Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe surpassing it's Western European neighbours both economically and militarily (that's why NATO was formed in response to Soviet Union military rise). Soviet Union was world's 2nd largest economy from 1960-1985 during its heyday. Source: Soviet Union was world's 2nd largest economy from 1960-1985 wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_largest_historical_GDP#Overview_of_the_ten_largest_economies And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
    3
  9112. KH Lee  Soviet Union collapsed because they gave in to the peoples demands too quickly, and that's why Soviet Union dissolved. Whereas in China, the communist party implement policies slowly and steadily, not rapid and instantaneously like Soviet Union (or when Trump suddenly becomes president and start implementing his own seemingly reckless policies) That's how China was able to survive the fall of USSR, when Deng took a strong hand to the Tiananmen Incident protestors. Otherwise, its possible that China would be fragmented into different countries, like the Soviet Union losing control of its separate states. Also, I want to ask you why are you so certain that after President Xi, the future leader will be more corrupted and the censorship will be increasing? You mean you can somehow see into the future?
    3
  9113.  @tennis5126  Freedom is the ability and capability to do certain things within a defined limit. You can't have unlimited freedom (do whatever you want, grab a gun and go shoot people, steal from others and so on) neither can you have limited freedom (lack of rights to food, to education, to security, etc). Everyone has a different definition of freedom, and all countries in the world are striving towards achieving balance in freedoms within their own countries (China is no different in this regard)
    3
  9114. @Toroidal Zeus Thanks for your compliment, but I'm sure there are many other posters on YouTube which are just as well informed. All my online information and web resources are easily accessible online if only people would start looking.
    3
  9115. +Parm Mohan The USA claims to uphold "Freedom of Navigation" under the United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) but what is less known is that USA isn't even a signatory to UNCLOS itself! Yet USA wants to uphold freedom of navigation according to UNCLOS, despite not even ratifying UNCLOS itself?
    3
  9116. +Parm Mohan The United Nations was formed by the Allies (USA, UK, France, Russia and China) in order to oppose the Axis powers of Germany, Italy and Japan. The UN Security Council was formed from the victorious allies which made our 5 countries permanent members, and India did not play as big a role in WWII as our 5 countries. Its just how the UN Charter was formed.
    3
  9117. +Parm Mohan You claim I'm wrong? Since when was India given membership and a seat in UNSC? When did India gave that seat to China? I've found this source from Indian Newspaper and Indian Prime Minister Nehru has categorically denied any offer, formal or informal, having been received about a seat for India in the UN Security Council The Prime Minister said: "There has been no offer, formal or informal, of this kind. Some vague references have appeared in the press about it which have no foundation in fact. The composition of the Security Council is prescribed by the UN Charter, according to which certain specified nations have permanent seats. No change or addition can be made to this without an amendment of the Charter. There is, therefore, no question of a seat being offered and India declining it. Our declared policy is to support the admission of all nations qualified for UN membership.'' UN seat: Nehru clarifies Source: thehindu.com/2005/09/28/stories/2005092800270900.htm So why do you claim that I am wrong and that India was offered a seat which India gave to China? India's PM Nehru himself has denied such offer so where's your proof that India was offered a seat at UNSC? Why are we even talking about USA saving China? You were asking about UN membership, and both the US and China are a permanent members, whereas India isn't, so why bring up USA saving China? USA did not even invade the Japanese mainland, and the Japanese only surrendered after Russia joined the Allies against Japan and invaded the Japanese occupied region of Manchuria. Wikipedia: Soviet invasion of Manchuria wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Manchuria
    3
  9118.  @MarkYeung1  What makes you claim hate crimes in China are not reported? The Chinese government takes a serious stance toward crimes committed against ethnic minorities in China. Also you asked this question: "Do you know how many Chinese are living in Vancouver willingly, instead of in China?" well there are about 500,000 Chinese in Vancouver, compared to about 1,400,000,000 Chinese living in China.
    3
  9119.  @MarkYeung1  I thought you were comparing how many Chinese live in Vancouver compared to China, but after I gave you the figures that 500,000 Chinese live in Vancouver compared to 1,400,000,000 Chinese living in China, you suddenly switch to Pyongyang?
    3
  9120.  @MarkYeung1  Some people in Hong Kong (but not all) are still suffering from a subservient "colonial mentality" even decades after Hong Kong has been physically decolonized from Britain. Especially for those people who left Hong Kong, the "decolonization of the mind" still needs to happen, in order to heal from the mental damage that the colonizer inflicts onto the minds of colonized.
    3
  9121.  @hyc1266  I hope more overseas Chinese (especially those from Hong Kong) learn to properly "decolonize their minds". To recognize the colonizer's thoughts in their head, a voice that's telling them to belittle anything non-white and non-Western in nature. Only by decolonizing the mind, can a former colony's people be truly free of colonialism, otherwise they are still serving their colonial masters interests even till today.
    3
  9122.  @wongchiseng3198  Look at African Americans getting shot/killed by police officers such as George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks and so on, sparking off Black Lives Matter protests across the USA, yet you want to complain about how China treats Africans? Which person of African descent has been killed by Chinese police while in China?
    3
  9123.  @neil6958  Over 50 years ago, nobody thought that China would ever be successful, or play any important role in global politics, yet look at where China is today? Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain and wasn't fully returned. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us. I've already explained the idea behind the Social Credit System, to reward good social behaviour and to penalise bad behaviour. But you Westerners often quote the storybook by Orville, but that's just a work of fiction! The author deliberately exaggerate the negative aspects of technology for entertainment purposes and to attract readership, but it doesn't necessarily mean that reality will follow in its example. Under old Chinese laws, it was legal to harvest organs from prisoners on death row, but only with the express permission of the prisoner or their family members. In my opinion, the criminal is already sentenced to death, so at least the harvested organs will be put to good use saving someone's life, instead of being wasted and rotting away with the body. But since 2014, China has abolished the act of harvesting organs from executed prisoners and China's organ transplant rates are low, and the organ waiting lists are long. Source: The Economist: China ends the practice of harvesting organs from executed prisoners economist.com/graphic-detail/2014/12/30/organ-harvest
    3
  9124.  @neil6958  150~300 years ago? That's almost around the British Industrial Revolution period, who's talking about that? We are talking about the 19th century, not the 18th century. And what do you mean by the government is impatient with Hong Kong? Hong Kong today clearly have their own government separate from the mainland and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections.
    3
  9125.  @tomspencer1364  You asked: "What do you do when they start to do an awful job?" Throughout China's 5000 years of history, China has our fair share of tyrant emperors neglecting state affairs and indulging in pleasures while the common people suffered, yet China's authoritarian political system has survived for millenia. Peasants eventually rise up to overthrow the Emperor and the imperial court. But guess what happens next? Another Emperor is eventually installed in power after the uprising, and China's authoritarian political system continues as it has until the modern times. "神州 Shenzhou Did I say the CCP was doing an awful job?" If you support the idea that the Communist Party of China is doing a good job governing China, then we are in agreement. A recent long-term study by Harvard University has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the CPC. Source: Harvard survey finds Chinese satisfaction with govt rises china.org.cn/china/2020-07/17/content_76281590.htm About the exceptionally bad performance of the United States in dealing with Covid-19, I agree that the root of problem probably started decades ago (like you said). But had democracy been "self-correcting" like you said, then you would have rooted out the problem decades ago. This shows that simply changing government doesn't solve the problem at all, you need to change policies, not change governments. In short, in USA, you can change the government, but not the policies. Whereas in China, you can't change the government, but the policies change. Finally, with regards to your last statement, there's no shame in being an elderly person. In Chinese culture, elders are respected, for they are fonts of wisdom, just waiting to impart their knowledge to the new generation.
    3
  9126.  @stopwarstop7334  You literally just admitted that Taiwan is part of China when you said "Taiwan is part of Republic of China" because both PRC and ROC agree on the One China Policy (that there is only One China) and that Taiwan is part of China since the 1992 Consensus.
    3
  9127. China has offered to extend the One-China Two-Systems policy we share with Hong Kong to include Taiwan as well, but so far, Taiwanese government rejected it and did not offer counterproposal.
    3
  9128. I disagree with Pascal's title though. Bhutan is hardly the country to lead Asia's rise. Everyone knows that it's China that's responsible for Asia's rise, yet Bhutan has no formal relations with China, and hardly trades with China. The Belt and Road Initiative by China is improving land-connectivity among landlocked countries, yet Bhutan is not part of BRI. Is Bhutan really qualified to lead Asia's rise, when it refuses to ride the waves of the rising power that is China?
    3
  9129.  @zetristan4525  You've never liked my thoughts, you wrote a scathing post directed against me for my views. Your post was full of vitriol, claiming I lived in Cyrus' comment section (when here I am in Pascal's comment section), and you made insinuations against me just because I am Chinese, so I seek to undo humiliation. What's wrong with bringing up China's side of the story? And you keep claiming I lack constructive balanced accuracy, when you never actually post any of your own that contains that.
    3
  9130.  @boogle785  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    3
  9131. Zelenskyy keeps on wanting more weapons, but how is Ukraine going to wield them when they are running out of soldiers?
    3
  9132.  George Haskas  China has more STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) graduates than any other country in the world. Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/02/02/the-countries-with-the-most-stem-graduates-infographic/ 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000)
    3
  9133. ​ George Haskas  In 2016, China completed world's largest radio telescope, the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) also known as Tianyan (天眼) 'Eye of the Heavens.' The 1,650-foot-wide dish was built in China's Guizhou Province and will help scientists learn more about the universe's early days, detect low-frequency gravitational waves and hunt for signals that may have been produced by distant alien civilizations. Source: China Finishes Building World's Largest Radio Telescope space.com/33357-china-largest-radio-telescope-alien-life.html The larger the radio dish, the more sensitive it is to picking up signals from space and FAST's potential to discover an alien civilization will be 5 to 10 times that of current equipment, as it can see farther and darker planets. Since its trial operations began in 2016, China's radio telescope has discovered 44 new pulsars, which are a type of solar phenomena in which a rapidly rotating star emits radiation periodically (like some sort of "cosmic lighthouse" if you will) Video: 44 pulsars identified by China's FAST telescope youtube.com/watch?v=t9nySMjiUzw
    3
  9134.  @TimeManInJail  The Soviet Union was a communist country yet had great scientific innovation, especially in space. For example, the world's first satellite was Russian Sputnik-1, the first man in space was Russian cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, and the first space station was Soviet Salyut-1. So as long as what your thinking doesn't go against the government, innovation can still happen even in communist country like USSR.
    3
  9135.  @TimeManInJail  China is world's 3rd country to launch space stations into orbit, after USA and USSR. Tiangong-1 (天宫一号) was China's first prototype space station launched in 2011, followed by Tiangong-2 in 2016. There was even a "space lecture" by Chinese taikonaut demonstrating simple micro-gravity experiments in space on board Tiangong-1 to her students directly on the ground below Video: Chinese teacher in space gives lecture to her students youtube.com/watch?v=OUAuZnpoZ58 Thorough this, we are teaching our kids, and future generations of Chinese, that China is both an ancient civilization, as well as a modern space nation, capable of achieving equally impressive feats as Westerners. Why should Asians consider ourselves inferior to Westerners? We should at least see ourselves as equal to Westerners and work hard to try and achieve the same accomplishments they did.
    3
  9136. The American CHIPS act is actually hampering it's global partners, which explains why Japan and South Korea are unwilling to follow through with it.
    3
  9137. The missile crisis on the Korean peninsula is primarily between North Korea, South Korea and USA, and not China. China can at the most, act as a neutral negotiator for both sides to settle the dispute peacefully.
    3
  9138. China made a statement in Mandarin language. Marcos Jr used the language of their former colonial masters.
    3
  9139.  @markoshae5649  China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilizations still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome and Egypt eventually crumbled. China has witness the rise and fall of various other countries, yet China has made it to modern times relatively intact.
    3
  9140.  @bruceplenderleith838  Photographs and videos show that the rocket part faces the northeast, which means that the missile may have arrived from the southwest, which is the direction of Ukrainian controlled territory such as Dobropillia. So it's possible that this attack on Kramatorsk was orchestrated by Ukrainian forces themselves.
    3
  9141. ​ @longcimb Singapore is the only ASEAN country to have purchased US F-35 fighters.
    3
  9142.  @covertpuppytwo3322  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    3
  9143. And it seems that they don't even know that they're bleeding.
    3
  9144. The PLA airforce also manufacture our very own combat UAVs, like the CaiHong-5, that has been compared to the US's Reaper drone. But in Dec 2017, India crashed an Israeli-made drone at our border, after illegally entering Chinese airspace.
    3
  9145.  @patricksmith1626  If hypothetically, the Communist Party supposedly paid Cyrus Janssen to spread this message of "building bridges between China and the West" then isn't it a positive message to promote? Rather than promoting hatred and racism against people of Asian descent?
    3
  9146.  @pithikoulis  5 demands? One of the demands is that all arrested rioters be set free and cleared of all rioting charges. Why should Hong Kong government bow down to this demand and release all those rioters arrested for commiting acts of violence, arsonism, vandalism, hurling petrol bombs, breaking building windows, security cameras, traffic lights, and damaging HK MTR stations, setting shops on fire and so on?
    3
  9147.  @TheNoobzoid  Previously, when Hong Kong was under British colonial rule, the 1956 HK riots resulted 59 deaths while the 1967 HK riots resulted in 51 deaths. Yet after the handover, today's 2019 HK riots resulted in zero deaths thus far so aren't the Hong Kong Police showing incredible restraint here?
    3
  9148.  @laserraiset3300  "神州 Shenzhou so egypt and rome not exist anymore ?" Not the ancient Egyptian civilization nor the Republic of Rome.
    3
  9149.  @nickiseb8910  There is no "Philippine Sea" recorded on the world map, I presume you're referring to the South China Sea? Also, the Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence in 1946 that the Spratlys was not Philippine territory, both to not anger Chiang Kai-shek in China and because the Spratlys were not part of the Philippines per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Timeline of the South China Sea dispute)
    3
  9150.  @edwin2600  You said: "We don't have state run or state approved media" The BBC is funded principally by an annual television licence fee set by the British Government, agreed by Parliament, and is used to fund the BBC's radio, TV, and online services covering the nations and regions of the UK. Likewise, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation is a federal Crown corporation funded by the government. So BBC's and CBC's purse strings are controlled by their respective British and Canadian governments. Even in the United States, everyone knows that Fox News is controlled by the Republicans while CNN is controlled by the Democrats. So it's a myth that Western MSM aren't state approved or government controlled.
    3
  9151. Chinese workers worked hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, clothing, sneakers, etc cheap, so that inflation in the U.S is kept to a minimum and the cost of living is lower than it should be. Think of the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursuits like cars, housing, luxury brands, or essentials like school fees, tuition fees, doctors fees and hospital bills.
    3
  9152. Japan occupied the Diaoyu Islands, then after Japanese WW2 surrender, they relinquished all their occupied territories, so shouldn't the Diaoyu islands be returned to China? Why USA can sign the Okinawa Reversion Agreement with Japan, and without consulting China, who is the original owner of Diaoyu Islands? USA is not even the owner of Diaoyu Islands, but can sign away our territory to Japan like that?
    3
  9153. USA lost the Vietnam War, and did not win the Korean War, so how will USA crush China? Look even in the Middle East, USA been fighting for more than 15 years against some insurgents, and still USA did not win. In 15 years, the soldier's kids back home can easily grow up in such a time span, and yet their parents still haven't won the war in the Middle East.
    3
  9154. Nabium How do you know what Chinese people have access to? Chinese people can watch Japanese anime too, from websites like 哔哩哔哩 Bilibili, a video sharing website themed around anime, manga, and game fandom based in China. I grew up watching Transformers tv series too, so what are you talking about? Regarding American TV shows, we can watch The Walking Dead, Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Breaking Bad and South Park online so what's the big idea here? You think every Chinese person watches television that's all? We are living in digital age, so why are you looking at China through TV shows only? That video about Chinese being descended from different homonid species must be about Peking Man, which was homonid discovered in China. Its not just Chinese who thought this was true, because Franz Weidenreich (1873 – 1948) considered Peking Man as a human ancestor and specifically an ancestor of the Chinese people, as seen in his original multiregional model of human evolution in 1946. Open country or not, China joined WTO in 2001 and has been striving towards more openess when Deng Xiaoping introduced economic reforms in 1970s. But other countries like USA and Europe have some of the most protectionist policies in place that make them seem less open than China.
    3
  9155.  @COYS-o2i  Before 1949, China was a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made-in-China), having world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the CPC, despite Western propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    3
  9156.  @kammonkam4905  Didn't you read my last paragraph? Just look at Hong Kong's medical system getting swamped. All your point about Shanghai supposedly under reporting cases helps to reinforce the need for Shanghai to take necessary to prevent unnecessary deaths, so you're helping support my argument that lockdown is indeed necessary to prevent loss of lives.
    3
  9157.  @Hanabis924  The once strictly zero Covid policy in China, has since morphed into a new dynamic zero Covid policy. As with any pivoting, there's bound to be a period of readjustment and recalibration according to changing ground conditions, and mistakes can crop up during implementation of new policy. But it should be realized that the situation would most likely be far worst had Shanghai not implemented lockdown at all.
    3
  9158.  @kammonkam4905  Had Hong Kong not done that, then the asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients would have gone on to spread the virus and cause more elderly to die because of the virus. I've answered that Lu Muying was not counted because her lung scans did not show a patient with evidence of pneumonia, so how have I not answered anything? It's you who refuse to accept my answers that's all. It's not a siege, because nobody is starving to death, and there's supplies being distributed, just that people can't get access to certain supplies that they want, but not need. The basic necessities for each citizens are met.
    3
  9159. Here's the Chinese way to explain the Ukraine/Russia war to help clear up the confusion through a story: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (i.e NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was enraptured with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband and dreams of marrying into the NATO family, and of milking her ex-husband dry of his assets. The village chief didn't want to marry Ukraine into the family. She was high-maintenance and loved to splurge money. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) went crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex husband and wife conflict, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would have to join the fight against the ex-husband.
    3
  9160. During the Vietnam War, the American soldiers deployed chemical weapons like Agent Orange, causing birth defects in Vietnamese children even up till today.
    3
  9161. Dean Cutler "The claim that the communists defeated the Japanese is almost completely false." The Soviet Communists defeated Japan when they invaded Manchuria, causing the Japanese to surrender. And since the Communist Party of China is allied with the Soviets, then why can't they give weapons and equipment to the CPC? Its like how US President Truman gave millions of dollars of aid to KMT, but KMT pocketed $750 millions dollars in US aid. Where did all those US aid to the KMT go to?
    3
  9162. Chinese come to Philippines to do business deals and build infrastructure, but what did Americans do to Philippines? Build US military bases.
    3
  9163.  Akimbo Soulassassin  Western society was literally built upon the backs of African slavery, causing genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, occupation of their lands even till today, brutal colonisation of Asia (India, Hong Kong, Singapore) and African countries and plundering of resources like gold. Westerners today are rich, because they're sitting on a pile of wealth and land that their ancestors took from Asia, Africa, America, Australia, etc. Thr current world order still continues to favor the Western developed countries at the expense of developing countries and China's rise would help bring balance to the disparity between the minority developed countries and the majority developing countries.
    3
  9164.  @kswong8270  China also signed a "No-First-Use" policy regarding nuclear weapons, meaning that China will not preemptively launch a nuclear assault against any country, unless we are ourselves attacked with nukes first. But the USA hasn't signed the "No-First-Use" policy, so if there's to be a nuclear war, China won't be the one starting it.
    3
  9165. American Dream is about how every immigrant to the U.S can hopefully strike it rich some day and climb the corporate ladder to become a CEO. However, only 1% of Americans achieve this dream. Chinese Dream is about the eventual rejuvenation of Chinese civilization, and this requires lifting people out of poverty to form a moderately prosperous society.
    3
  9166. NATO is the Hare, throwing out sanctions and eventually exhausting their options before reaching the finish line, all the while mocking Russia for being slow. Russia is the Tortoise, making slow but steady progress towards the finish line.
    3
  9167.  @tingli3403  How exactly have mainlanders been ungrateful to Hong Kong? The mainland imports food, water and even electricity to Hong Kong to keep Hong Kong's economy running. Hong Kong imports about 70% of its water demand from the Dongjiang River in neighbouring Guangdong province in the mainland. Hong Kong electrical grid is interconnected with the China Southern Power Grid of Mainland China and Hong Kong imports 23% of its total electricity needs from the mainland. Source: Water supply and sanitation in Hong Kong wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_supply_and_sanitation_in_Hong_Kong Source: Electricity sector in Hong Kong wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_Hong_Kong#Interconnection_with_China So how exactly have mainlanders been ungrateful to Hong Kong people? Hong Kong today is dependent on the mainland for basic necessities and mainland is repaying our food, clothing, and money debt to Hong Kong.
    3
  9168.  Fail Zero USA 1776  Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in reunifying a divided China where the previous administration failed under Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. When Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    3
  9169.  @nexu6517  China has built at least 35,000 mosques, more than France's 2,300, America's 2,106, and Great Britain's 1,600. Even on the per capital basis, Chinese Muslims still have more than triple the amount of mosques their Western peers have. Video: What's China's 're-education camp' in Xinjiang really about? youtu.be/U3YBomwuB10?t=80
    3
  9170.  @ronniechew6566  At that time, China wasn't yet a superpower, and China was a relative newcomer to the global geopolitical stage after a long period of isolation. Perhaps Deng was rather naive towards the true U.S intentions. The U.S saw an opportunity to widen the Sino-Soviet Split, and made use of China against Vietnam, which is part of the Western Divide-and-Conquer strategy of pitting enemies against each other. The U.S has a long history of using allies against their enemies and then either abandoning them or turning against them. In a sense, China was a pawn on the chessboard between the USA and Soviet Union at that time. Hopefully, our leaders have learned to be not so trusting of the U.S intentions and never again will China be made use of.
    3
  9171.  @konradoziom2225  "Overall US and it's allies invests more in ASEAN then China." You're comparing a group (U.S and it's allies) with a single country, China then how's that a fair comparison?
    3
  9172.  @realsimonwest  The Bashar al-Assad government in Syria made a request to Russia to enter Syria against the rebels. As for Georgia, an EU-backed reported stated that it was Georgia that started the war with Russia. Also, Russia is mostly involved in regional conflicts along its periphery, and your list for Russia pales in comparison to the long list of wars that the US has been involved in such as Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, which are located far away from the American mainland.
    3
  9173.  @realsimonwest  "Shenzhou. That's because in Russia you risk being jailed for 15 years for discrediting the armed forces by being opposed to war." Tell that to Australian journalist Julian Assange, after he exposed the monitoring activities of the US of its allies. But instead of punishing the ones behind this, it was the journalist himself that was punished.
    3
  9174. ​ @realsimonwest  The Assad government did request Russia to get involved militarily in Syria, however, they did not invite the United States. The Assad government deems the U.S. military presence in Syria illegal and "considers the presence of Turkish and U.S. troops on its territory as an aggression and demands immediate and unconditional withdrawal of foreign forces from its territory." If you claim Russia should be condemned where the country's regional government did not request Russia's presence, then shouldn't you do the same to the US presence in Syria? Also, you said Russia has always supported rebels in internationally unrecognized independent states then could you name some examples?
    3
  9175.  @realsimonwest  "Not directly" meaning "indirectly"? That's of an even more pernicious nature. And if Americans are not the policy makers in allied countries, then why do allied countries policies benefit the United States at the expense of their own citizens? Take Australia for example. China is Australia's biggest trading partner but Australia signed onto the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal that would benefit the US while incurring a costly price to Australian citizens since they now have to pay for the nuclear subs. It shows that Australia's policy doesn't benefit their own citizens, but it benefits America.
    3
  9176.  @realsimonwest  Russian citizens are benefiting from Russia's war because it revealed the true colors of how Russia is actually perceived in the west. For example, Russian culture is being denigrated, and Russian ballet dancers, orchestra conductors, musicians, athletes, tennis players, chess players, etc are being discriminated against in the west because of their political views. And if you look up surveys about Russian leadership it turns out that a majority of Russians approve of Putin. But you can't say the same for the leaders of western democracies. Many of them are not popular among the people.
    3
  9177.  @realsimonwest  The Budapest Memorandum states that none of their weapons will ever be used except in cases of self-defense and that is precisely what Russia is doing. Like I said earlier, Ukraine is not even a NATO member yet why is NATO providing military aid to Ukraine?
    3
  9178. Experts estimate that USA abandoned seven Gerald Ford-class aircraft carriers worth of military equipment in Afghanistan.
    3
  9179.  @micixduda  Would you agree that outdated things are still bought using American taxpayer's money?
    3
  9180. Another often overlooked aspect of a political study of China is the history and culture. China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt or Mesopotamia have since succumbed to history. China has witness the rise and fall of various empires, and yet China has survived the passage of time till modern times relatively intact. Such history and culture has a huge influence on any political decision made by the Chinese government.
    3
  9181. It's even more interesting given that the conversation is in Mandarin.
    3
  9182.  @pagan-540  If you claim Taiwan is independent, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there some force preventing Taiwan from joining the UN?
    3
  9183.  @ianbelanger7459  Also, didn't I already refute your claim that "all companies in China are state-owned" using Huawei as an example? If you want another example, then ByteDance is a private company, not owned or controlled by the Chinese government according to TikTok CEO.
    3
  9184. Brahmos is only supersonic cruise missile, but China already tested hypersonic cruise missile that travel many times faster and extremely difficult to intercept.
    3
  9185.  @zilun  Trump will eventually have to step down, and then what's next? The USA lacks a long-term strategy against China, because US presidents have to step down after 4-8 years, and are thus, unable to make long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. Whereas Chinese government has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's direction and future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc, and to set specific goals for China to achieve. Some of these goals include (but are not limited to): -By 2020, China plans to eliminate poverty completely and establish moderately prosperous society. -By 2025, China plans to transform our manufacturing industry to incorporate high-end technology. -By 2030, China plans to be world leader in Artificial Intelligence -By 2035, China plans to be key innovative, scientific power and establish moderately socialist society. -By 2040, China plans to ban all fossil fuel powerplants and all non-electric vehicles for greener future. -By 2045, China plans to be world leading space nation, having established a space elevator. -By 2050, China plans to have surpassed the USA as global superpower, economically and militarily. By abolishing the presidential term limit, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come into fruition in the future. But the US presidents can't make long term plans, because they are limited by their term limits, and the two parties constantly fight among each other, sabotaging each other's plans, instead of fighting for America's future.
    3
  9186.  @seetheanimal5867  "神州 Shenzhou “still pretty much” sounds like your watching that wasteland fall apart" So you're referring to our country, China as a wasteland? China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China has transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieve under communist party leadership, despite Western media denouncing China's success all along.
    3
  9187.  @andrewmckenzie292  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    3
  9188.  @tetkongong6780  Agreed. Especially now that the U.S is transferring Taiwan's semiconductor chip fabrication technology to Arizona. Once the transfer of chip technology is complete, Taiwan would no longer seem attractive enough for the U.S to risk send troops to defend, if military conflict breaks out in the Taiwan Strait. Hopefully the people of Taiwan realize this before its too late.
    3
  9189.  @gabrielmataleo4573  Independence is not just snapping your fingers and Hong Kong get granted independence just like that. Before independence, Singapore had no army of its own, and when British troops withdrew from Singapore, they had to scramble to build up their defenses and establish a military budget and a defence force. For that, they implemented National Service where all young men of certain age get conscripted into the army for 2 and half years, which was compulsory and unpopular among the people. Furthermore, they had less young men entering in the workforce for 2 years as a result of of this forced conscription. So how can you apply Singapore's example to Hong Kong? Hong Kong has no army and currently enjoys the mainland People's Liberation Army (world's largest land army) protection, since it is part of China. If Hong Kong becomes independent, they will need to establish military budget and implement conscription of their own, so young men will be forced to join the HK army. Will young Hong Kong men want that? Being forced into conscription? And HK workforce will have less men during in the meantime. Furthermore the need for defence budget means Hong Kong taxpayer need to pay more money for defence. Hong Kong's economy is currently in a slump, so will it be able to take such a hit?
    3
  9190.  @shauniek  " 神州 Shenzhou Maybe they should just invest in solar and wind," Solar and Wind energy require plenty of land to operate, and land is something that Hong Kong lacks. Mainland China has plenty of space, so it can afford to have largest solar farm and wind farms. Video: China's first 100MW solar power plant put into operation youtube.com/watch?v=K2A7Xw_LHEQ
    3
  9191.  @gabrielmataleo4573  You mentioned earlier that Hong Kong have 2x the land of Singapore. But in terms of natural resources, Hong Kong doesn't have anything, just like Singapore. Singapore has the benefit of its strategic location, between the East and the West, and at the tip of Malaysia, so many ships pass by its waters, so it developed rapidly as port city, since its neighbors, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, and others in the vicinity didn't have excellent ports like the Port of Singapore. Singapore is lucky because of its location. But while Hong Kong is port city too, it is surrounded by other port cities. Hong Kong used to be global financial hub and busiest port city next to mainland China, however, it has since fallen behind mainland cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo, etc, and is facing increasing competition from rising mainland port cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian, etc. It's no wonder why the people of Hong Kong feel as though they being left behind. List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage
    3
  9192.  @gabrielmataleo4573  Could you perhaps introduce these "solutions"? Because all I've been hearing about you so far seems to be "Hong Kong still have factories, Hong Kong have many world class facilities, etc" yet "Hong Kong are protesting, complaining, etc." Protesting and criticizing won't help Hong Kong. Solutions and snswers will.
    3
  9193. Matth Trep But after 99 years, the debt will be fully repaid and the port returned to them, so exactly how is their sovereignty being threatened by China?
    3
  9194. Both Hu Jintao and Joe Biden are about the same advanced age at 79 years.
    3
  9195.  @gmgunnhildr2711  I heard that in Singapore, the government has the power to arrest you for illegal assembly if you gather in groups of three or more.
    3
  9196.  @vibemunster  In Singapore, they also force all young men who reach 18 years of age to conscript in the army, and undergo two years of compulsory military training. These young men are kept away from their families and girlfriends during this period, and just like the Uighurs, they can only see their families once a week or so. But Westerner don't seem to be complaining about the way Singapore treat their young men.
    3
  9197.  @vibemunster  During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want what the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want, because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to spread the addiction throughout rest of China, and Hong Kong was taken and made into British colony. Even after Britain renounced ownership over its former colonies, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to sign an agreement for Britain to hand over what was originally ours.
    3
  9198.  @vibemunster  Whoever said Britain brought these places to an international level? Look at other British former colonies like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and all those former British colonies in Africa, and they haven't prospered as much as Hong Kong, mainland China and Singapore. And that does not excuse the 19th century British forcing opium onto China to weaken our country and take Hong Kong from us.
    3
  9199.  @vibemunster  Japan and South Korea copied much of Chinese culture, such as chopsticks, Chinese architecture, bonsai, Chinese characters (Japanese Kanji and Korean Hanja), Chinese poems and calligraphy, rice growing, silkworm cultivation for their pretty clothing. Did you know that the Japanese Kimono and Korean Hanbok actually had origins in Chinese traditional clothing Hanfu? Video: Beautiful Traditional Costume: Han Chinese Clothing (Hanfu) youtube.com/watch?v=T6CucJxiWec&t=4
    3
  9200.  @vibemunster  "神州 Shenzhou I already stated why Africa has failed," Where? All you said was "As for Africa, the people speak for themselves." that's all. As for India, you have shown that because of religion, a once unified country can fall apart because of religion, so why can't Chinese government control of religion to prevent that from happening? If you don't control religion, then religion will start to control your country. "the estimated 45 million Mao murdered." It was during Chinese Civil War, so of course Chinese were killing Chinese. Just like in American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans, or Vietnamese killing Vietnamese in Vietnam War. Or Koreans in Korean War, or any civil war for that matter. And Mao Zedong managed to unify China (which the previous Kuomintang government failed under Republic of China) under communism and proclaimed the People's Republic of China back in 1949. So if not for Mao, China today would still be a divided country country fighting among ourselves, (like India and Pakistan), instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    3
  9201.  @vibemunster  Who says China is not innovative? As the world's most populous country, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to carry out said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses and this can be proven by statistics Source: China's Statistical Advantage: http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Taken from above: Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    3
  9202.  @vibemunster  About innovation in China, the government is pouring funds into Research and Development, and we already have world's 2nd highest R&D spending and catching up rapidly to the United States. Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by research and development spending wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($451.9 billion) <---- 3. European Union ($379.0 billion) 4. Japan ($165.7 billion) 5. Germany ($118.8 billion) 6. South Korea ($91.6 billion) ...
    3
  9203.  @thenutbrothers8726   China publishes more scientific and technical journals in physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences, than even the United States. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_scientific_and_technical_journal_articles In 2016: 1. China (426,165 articles) 2. United States (408,985 articles) 3. India (110,320 articles) 4. Germany (103,122 articles) 5. United Kingdom (97,527 articles) 6. Japan (96,536 articles) This implies that a growing number of discoveries are being made and published in Chinese-language papers, and Chinese researchers have access to Western research papers, but Chinese research papers might prove difficult for Western researchers due to the language barrier.
    3
  9204.  @xoom1712  Agreed. At least in the video, Uighurs can still leave once a week to take bus back to their home villages (which might be very remote)
    3
  9205.  @vibemunster  If religion has torn many countries then why can't China control religion, instead of letting religion control China? I heard that Philippines is allowing Muslims to vote for the proposed creation of an autonomous region in Southern Philippines. Source: theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/21/philippines-muslims-vote-in-referendum-on-new-autonomous-region In my opinion, this is stupid. Why let the radical Muslims divide your country, Philippines? Because of conflict? Once you allow a creation of an autonomous region, they may grow to become a thorn in your side. Look at Pakistan and India for example, brother states that keep on fighting among themselves. China will not give up Xinjiang, it is our territory since before Islam was even born and it was Islamic invaders that conquered the region and converted the natives to Islam.
    3
  9206.  @JohnBobb  What exactly do you know about Chinese classical music? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China's classical music dates back thousand of years and many are still being played in modern times. For example, this classical Chinese musical piece is entitled High Mountains, Flowing Rivers (高山流水) played on Chinese zither (guzheng 古筝) and was created during Warring States period of China. This music was even selected to represent China's theme in Sid Meier's Civilization 5 game series Video: Guzheng - High Mountain Flowing Water 古筝-高山流水 (By SoundofChina) youtube.com/watch?v=ffCKlqWOewo
    3
  9207.  @akif5638  1. The PAP is doing excellent job running Singapore for 54 years, so if its not broken, why fix it? Look at Singapore's opposition and they are laughable against the PAP, and they represent no real threat to PAP. China also have been run by authoritarian single-party CCP for 70 years and China is doing well under authoritarian rule. Besides Chinese communist party, we also have 8 other non-communist parties and they are: -Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang (RCCK) 中国国民党革命委员会（民革) -China Democratic League (CDL) 中国民主同盟（民盟） -China Democratic National Construction Association (CDNCA) 中国民主建国会（民建） -China Association for Promoting Democracy (CAPD) 中国民主促进会（民进） -Chinese Peasants' and Workers' Democratic Party (CPWDP) 中国农工民主党（农工党） -China Zhi Gong Party (CZGP) 中国致公党（致公党） -Jiusan Society (JS) 九三学社 -Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League (TDSGL) 台湾民主自治同盟（台盟） Source: Wikipedia: List of political parties in China 2. The Uighurs in the school in the video also get time off to visit friends (you see them boarding the bus to return to their home villages in Xinjiang) and Singapore young men who have been conscripted are certainly not available to be with their friends and family throughout the week. Only weekends like you said that's all.
    3
  9208.  @akif5638  3. Are you sure you are allowed to criticise the government in Singapore? According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore ( hrw.org/asia/singapore ) Singapore’s political environment is stifling. Citizens face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. In 2017, the country tightened the already strict limits on public assemblies contained in the Public Order Act, which requires police permits for any “cause-related” assembly outside the closely monitored “Speakers’ Corner.” Look what happened to Singapore Dissident Amos Yee, who was arrested by the Singapore government for his criticising Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore's founder) and he got sentenced to jail for speaking out against the government. Are you sure you are from Singapore yourself, if you don't even know what you are allowed to do in your own country? Singapore's authoritarian government is almost exactly like China isn't it?
    3
  9209.  @meeveebee  So what's wrong with my point? All Singapore makes reaching 18 years of age undergo forced conscription (refusal to do so will get you arrested by your authoritian government) and you will only get to see your friends and family about once a week that's all (South Koreans don't get to) so which part of my statement is wrong? Likewise, the Uighurs here also get to see their families about once a week so why are you accusing me of spreading untruths and lies? Which of my points are untruths you tell me?
    3
  9210.  @meeveebee  Here I found this forum about "Is Forced/compulsory Military Conscription Morally Right?" and Singapore forced conscription is being talked about and compared to "slavery" Source: "Is Forced/compulsory Military Conscription Morally Right?" depressionforums.org/forums/topic/98638-is-forcedcompulsory-military-conscription-morally-right/ One person wrote: My country Singapore currently has 2 year military conscription compulsory for all males aged 18. Failing to comply to the law will face 3 year imprisonment and fined SGD 10 000. I actually find it pressurizing and pointless. I was so stressed up that I started self harming myself when the enlistment letter came. 3 months basic military training of that 2 year, recruits can't go home. Worse of all, our government is paying the soldiers quite lowly, at least 2 - 3 times lower than the normal monthly incomes of city jobs. I feel it is slavery than I have anything to gain from it. I've more to lose than I've anything to gain. It hurts my self esteem quite a lot thinking about it. Shaving bald and slaved inside as a recruit. I think it is cruelty. Don't get me wrong, my personal stance is that forced military conscription is essential in order for Singapore to survive as a country. Who's going to serve in the Singapore army if not Singapore people? Just like in Xinjiang, re-education of these potential Uighur extremists is essential for China to reform their ways, provide free education for them and train these Uighurs in job skills to prepare them for the workforce in China. Through this, I hope the Uighurs emerge as productive members of society
    3
  9211.  @meeveebee  Hey, my stance is that forced conscription is necessary for Singapore, and like I said, you don't get to see your families everyday only once a week (On the weekends like you said) so how is this different from Uighurs re-education, where they are also allowed to see their families once a week? And conscripted Singapore males have to live in boarding rooms similar to the ones featured here, so again, wheres the difference you are claiming? And Singapore government is clearly authoritarian, and Singapore people have been "brainwashed" to vote for PAP every time at elections. For example, since a young age, many Singapore children at school sing nationalistic songs promoting Singapore propaganda, especially during Singapore's founding day, and Singapore conscripted males also train to become patriotic to the country in the miltiary. So how is this different from teaching Uighurs to be patriotic to China?
    3
  9212.  @meeveebee  According According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore (check previous source) Singapore’s political environment is stifling. Citizens face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. In 2017, the country tightened the already strict limits on public assemblies contained in the Public Order Act, which requires police permits for any “cause-related” assembly outside the closely monitored “Speakers’ Corner.” Also, Singapore Activist Seelan Palay was arrested after presenting a performance on Sunday afternoon at Hong Lim Park, “32 Years: The Interrogation of a Mirror” in commemoration of the 32 years of detention without trial that former Elected Member of Parliament, Chia Thye Poh went through. During the ten minute performance, Seelan who turns 32 this year, said he couldn’t fathom how a person could be locked up without trial for the same number of years that he has lived. Source: Activist arrested by Police outside of Parliament House after standing alone with artpiece theonlinecitizen.com/2017/10/01/activist-arrested-by-police-outside-of-parliament-house-after-standing-alone-with-artpiece/ Are you sure you are really from Singapore? Because all my sources point to Singapore clearly being under authoritarian government, governing Singapore for 50 years, just like CCP governed People's Republic of China for 70 years
    3
  9213.  @meeveebee  So what's wrong with Uighurs singing patriotic songs about China? Every country does it to its citizens as you have shown, then why is it wrong when China does it to our citizens? Can't you see your unfair double standards here? I have shown that Singapore is authoritian and I cited numerous sources to support my claim. You on the other hand, only regaled this thread with numerous personal anecdotes of your own experiences, and failed to support your points at all with concrete evidence, so why should I believe you? I have cited numerous examples of Singapore dealing with dissidents and also a forum where forced conscription is being compared to slavery, so who is the biased person here, if not you? Where's your evidence to support your argument?
    3
  9214.  @akif5638  By reciting your pledge, you are literally showing that you have been brainwashed by Singapore nationalistic propaganda. Forced conscription is a great way to make young men more patriotic to the country, so why can't China teach Uighurs to be more patriotic to China through re-education? China's Islamic education is the same as Singapore's Islamic education, we remove all the extremist elements from the student's thoughts. In Singapore, you can practice Islam and only condition is that you are respectful to people with other beliefs than yours. Likewise, China allows Muslims do any Islam things except things against the nation or the party and the Government respects Muslim tradition and custom as long as they obey the law and order. As for Singapore building a" democratic society" your country has been literally ruled by authoritarian single party PAP for its entire life already. How is that democratic? Did you know that in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the population also gets to vote for Kim Jong Um to lead them? You think Singapore does not have dark history of its own? There are so many examples of Singapore dissidents being arrested, and Singapore news will of course paint them as "the enemies" in your country. The part about Amos Lee offending Christians was just a "cover" by Singapore media to punish him for his political views, and you just believe it like that? Even US Asylum court made the following assertion for his asylum: “The evidence presented at the hearing demonstrates that Singapore’s prosecution of Yee was a pretext to silence his political opinions critical of the Singapore government. His prosecution, detention and general maltreatment at the hands of the Singapore authorities demonstrates persecution on account of Yee’s political opinions. Yee is a young political dissident and his application for asylum is granted.” – The Honourable Samuel Cole, immigration judge. Source: A Singapore opposition politician’s experience of dissident Amos Yee’s US asylum hearing hongkongfp.com/2017/03/27/singapore-opposition-politicians-experience-dissident-amos-yees-us-asylum-hearing/ So are you really from Singapore when you don't even know how your country deals with political dissidents? And while you personally enjoyed forced conscription in your country, I have earlier cited a source about Singapore males who compare forced conscription to slavery. And Singapore is of course not China (just like China is not Singapore) but clearly, our countries share similar views with regard to authoritarian single-party rule, as well as crushing political dissidents. But you are the one pretending like Singapore is somehow better, when your political system is similar to ours.
    3
  9215.  @JohnBobb  China has a long history of music and Chinese instruments are still being used to day, and here's a beautiful erhu piece entitled Ballad of North Henan Province 《豫北叙事曲》by Chinese musician Yu Hongmei 于红梅 from the Central Conservatory of Music (CCM). Video: Erhu - Ballad of North Henan Province 豫北叙事曲 youtube.com/watch?v=7fdFGEg-9R8 It shows that Chinese classical music culture is still alive and well, even under the Chinese communist party rule, so what makes you think Chinese people ONLY value money and economic progress? China has world's largest population, and not everyone is focused on making money all the time, many Chinese artistes pursue the development of Chinese culture, so why do you seem to paint broad strokes about China being only interested in money making?
    3
  9216.  @JohnBobb  "It was hoped (and i did too) that you would find your way into a democracy (like HK and Taiwan)" Explain, why should China adopt Western democracy? Hong Kong had been ruled by authoritarian British colonial rule and it was successful, right up to democracy was introduced after Hong Kong handover to mainland China, then Hong Kong started suffering all the protests and its economy stagnated. And Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party Kuomintang rule for more than half its life! The KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist, and KMT leader Chiang kai-shek jailed and executed many dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror 白色恐怖 and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian KMT rule, Taiwan flourished and rapidly modernized and this was known as Taiwan Miracle. Between 1952 and 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 and 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 and 1986 and the percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 and 1986. And it was all achieved under authoritarian KMT rule. Only when democracy was introduced to Taiwan (because USA threatened to halt weapons sale to Taiwan if KMT did not introduce political reforms) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest in 1990s and today, Taiwan's economy is in a slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is high, and Taiwan graduates can't find job so they seek employment opportunities abroad, such as in the mainland or Singapore. So why should China introduce democracy then? Because Westerners say so?
    3
  9217. @@udlrrldu621 "Turkey has a real world experience fighting its enemies. I'm still waiting for China to actual do something rather than just talk." Well, why don't Turkey start off by sanctioning the oil that enters Israel by passing through its territory?
    3
  9218.  @Rex-ww4cw  You seem to have a Chinese surname (Chong) yourself. Are you not able to understand what 暗黑元首  is saying?
    3
  9219.  @Rex-ww4cw  Why not? Aren't you a Malaysian Chinese like you admitted?
    3
  9220. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. Source: Wikipedia: Fishing Industry in China
    3
  9221.  @atodaso1668  China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our over-reliance on coal power. Largest Dam in the world Video: /watch?v =b8cCsUBYSkw
    3
  9222. Since when is Youtube banned in China? So many foreign companies come to China do business everyday, and many require access to Western websites to operate, so people just use VPN if they want access Youtube in China. 30 million Chinese live in caves, because that is their traditional abode for many generations, and their parents/grand parents grew up there. Nowadays those people migrate to cities to find work, but some Chinese people like living in caves because it is cool during summer and warm during winter, and all without spending electricity, although electricity and running water can still be installed if needed. It has been compared to living in a villa, and other people have come to rent caves to stay in. There are people living in caves, in France, Spain and even India too. But the biased Western media will portray this like its a backward and poor society to live in cave in today's society.
    3
  9223.  @Monkey341  Then what's the proper term to describe the USA's actions here?
    3
  9224. Well said.
    3
  9225.  @MarkYeung1  I implore more people from Hong Kong to come visit the mainland and see what life is like here for themselves, rather than just blindly believe Western MSM negative portrayal of our country. Just look at prosperous Shenzhen (深圳) on the mainland from across the border. During the 70s, Shenzhen was dirt-poor, wetland village while Hong Kong at that time, was prosperous port city under British colonial rule. But fast forward till today, and Shenzhen has transformed from backwater village into a mecca of modern technology, China's "Silicon Valley", home to the latest gadgets, smartphones, cameras, electronics, drones, IT, Artificial Intelligence systems, robotics, automation, 5G, you name it. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China. Video: From backwater to big city: Shenzhen's transformation through reform and opening up youtu.be/srnGktWa3Hw
    3
  9226. In a poll of nearly 7500 readers by the United Daily News website, 61 percent said the trip was “not welcome” as it “may destabilise the Taiwan Strait”. Only 38 percent welcomed the visit and said it had “more advantages than disadvantages”.
    3
  9227.  @TheRealCheckmate  It's a dumb move for South Korea and especially Taiwan. Imagine once Taiwan chip manufacturing transfers to the USA, then U.S would no longer see a need to defend Taiwan if all their chip manufacturing had transfered to USA.
    3
  9228.  @Truthorfib  I like that Brian remains ever humble despite being a fount of knowledge. He has admitted that previously, like many others, he was once similarly fooled by the Western media but he eventually learned to question the narrative and to seek out opposing information and find sources.
    3
  9229.  @Darkademic  "My point is that it's not the "continuity" or age of these things that give them their value, it's the things themselves." The "continuity" of something means that it has survived the test of time, where other things have failed or aren't adopted or continued. Therefore doesn't the continuity of such things hold value?
    3
  9230.  @Darkademic  "Good ideas and good aspects of culture are good regardless of their age of how "continuous" they've been." But how would you know if an idea is good or not? An idea may sound good on paper, but it may fail some time after being implemented. The test of time helps distinguish good ideas from bad ones. Therefore, there is value in the "continuity" of good ideas.
    3
  9231.  @Darkademic  "Not really no, bad ideas have persisted for millennia." Bad ideas do surface from time to time, primarily because some people are ignorant of history. Thus they continue to repeat the same mistakes over and over again. Even China, throughout its long history, has had imperial dynasties end prematurely. because of circumstances or mistakes made by the rulers. However, a bad idea usually results in a discontinuation of the idea, whereas a good idea that survived for a long continuous period holds value in the sense that it has withstood what was thrown at it. Also, it's not just whether the ideas are good or bad alone. The circumstances in which the idea is implemented, could also influence the outcome being a success or a failure. For example, introducing modern democratic voting processes to a prehistoric period filled with early humans, with would most likely result in failure.
    3
  9232.  @MeemeeChern  "It just strikes me funny that there was no Chinese EV factory in China before Elon Musk’s factory there. The Chinese had no cell phone brand of their own until Apple’s Foxconn...it’s the art of copy, copy and copy." The world had no paper currency, until the invention of the paper banknote by the Chinese (let alone paper itself). The world had no gunpowder until its invention in China, same goes for the Chinese inventing early firearms, explosives, rockets, etc. Yet these Chinese inventions are widespread throughout the world today (and are still being used today) so the art of copying is not restricted to China alone. Everybody does it.
    3
  9233.  @Darkademic  "This doesn't address what I said. The assertion was that China has plenty of its own political ideas, yet its most famous leader chose to adopt a (terrible) Western ideology." I've already answered it with the last sentence of that post. You've been to China and you know how huge China is. During the Republic of China era, China was fragmented into various smaller provinces, each ruled by its own individual warlord. The task of reunifying such a huge country can truly be described as herculean, and that is precisely what Mao Zedong achieve. Therefore, (like I said earlier) I believe it's only natural that Marxism forms the basis of which the People's Republic of China is founded upon. Other political ideas can continue to influence China of course, but the basis should be that of Marxism. And Marxism is not a terrible ideology (as I've already explained with the Soviet Union). It transformed arguably what was once Europe's poorest country into its strongest as the Soviet Union.
    3
  9234.  @Darkademic  The USSR was arguably the strongest country in Europe during its heyday (which was the primary reason it was feared by the capitalist Western European countries). Economically, the Soviet Union had the largest economy in Europe and the 2nd largest economy in the world just after USA. Tsarist Russia's life expectancy was around 30 to 35 years, but it had doubled under the Soviet Union to 60-70 years. Even militarily, the Soviet Union had the largest military in Europe, able to outproduce even Germany during WWII. In fact, studies have shown that the the Soviet Union inflicted the most casualties onto the Germans during WWII. I would say if not for the Soviet Union during WWII, then it's possible we would be speaking German today. And that's not even mentioning the various scientific and technological innovations by the Soviet Union. Not only did the Soviets launched the world's first satellite, Sputnik into orbit, but the first man in space was Soviet Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin. It's like you've just simply dismiss all the amazing Soviet achievements.
    3
  9235.  @Darkademic  You've never really explained how you came to the conclusion that "Youth unemployment is not an example of more freedom". Whereas I've stated that had China been moving towards authoritarianism, then the government would be forcibly assigning jobs to the youth. Yet you seem to take it as me implying authoritarianism is a bad thing, then don't you want youths to find employment? Or you want them to have more freedom? "China has become more authoritarian in recent years. The size and power of the state has increased, and the economy has suffered as a result." You keep on saying that, but you fail to give examples of how China becoming more authoritarian is causing the economy to suffer. The economy could be suffering because of other factors (such as the pandemic or the various tariffs levied upon Chinese goods) so how do you know it's the government's move to authoritarian that's causing the economy to falter and not other factors?
    3
  9236.  @Darkademic  "It has prospered, thanks to the freedoms it has enjoyed for decades, and the cumulative actions of its people, but if the government keeps pushing it in its current direction things will get worse." Again, you keep implying China is moving away from freedoms towards authoritarianism without any explanation. Recently since March 2024, China implemented visa-free travel for passport holders from 12 countries: Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Malaysia, Switzerland, Ireland, Hungary, Austria, Belgium and Luxmbourg. All in bid to boost international tourism to China, so how's that China moving away from freedom and towards authoritarianism?
    3
  9237.  @Darkademic  "Unless you can link to studies which have somehow calculated and compared how much history is cherished," We have the names of all 650+ rulers of China, and the periods of history of which they ruled over China. Shang dynasty (c. 1600–1046 BCE) Tang 汤 (1570 BCE) Pan Geng 盤庚, Xiao Xin 小辛, Xiao Yi 小乙 (1300–1251 BCE) Wu Ding 武丁 (1250–1192 BCE) Zu Geng 祖庚 (1188–1178 BCE) Zu Jia 祖甲 (1177–1158 BCE) Lin Xin 廩辛 (1157–1149 BCE) Geng Ding 庚丁 Kang Ding 康丁 (1148–1132 BCE) Wu Yi 武乙 (1131–1117 BCE) Wen Wu Ding 文武丁 Wen Ding 文丁 (1116–1106 BCE) Di Yi 帝乙 (1105–1087 BCE) Di Xin 帝辛 (紂) (1086–1045 BCE)
    3
  9238.  @Darkademic  "Africa's life expectancy rose from 30 in the 1920s, to 63 in 1995. Is Africa an economic success?" Africa's life expectancy rising represents a rise in the quality of living (since Africans are living longer). My comment about Russian live expectancy doubling from 30-35 to 60-70 years was in response to your claim that Russia's life expectancy was low or that they do not enjoy quality of life. I think people in the Soviet Union were at least glad that they are living longer than they were previously. "Having a large army is not an economic achievement," An army requires money, logistics, manufacturing capabilities and manpower to sustain. Therefore a country whose economy is able to support such a huge army could be considered an economic achievement in and of itself. "and lots of industrial output can be done with slave labour. " Yet USSR workers enjoyed numerous welfare benefits, in fact the Soviet Union was the original (og) "welfare state", that coined the term, and that was later adopted by Western European countries. And did I neglect to mention the numerous scientific and technological advancements made by the Soviet Union? The Soviets not only launched the world's first satellite into orbit as well as the first man in space, but the Soviets also launched the world's first space station Salyut-1 into orbit.
    3
  9239.  @Quarksi  "However, considering you're from china it's probably illegal for you to consider any alternative possibility" Excuse me? Just because I'm from China suddenly means its illegal for me to consider any alternative possibility? Who do you think you are to discriminate against me based on where I'm from?
    3
  9240.  @canhaktan9674  The police officers can't possibly patrol the schools perimeter all day and night, whereas the barbed wire is always there 24/7, so doesn't it provide better protection than police officers? I mean, haven't you seen other schools with barbed wire around their fences of their own?
    3
  9241. @ALex T China has produced many Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, ZTE, LENOVO, DJI, Haier, Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, Bank of China, AgBank, ICBC, China Construction Bank, Ping An Insurance, Shenhua Energy, State Grid, Sinopec, China National Petroleum, China Minmetals, China State Construction, China Shipbuilding Industry, China State Shipbuilding, and so on. Many of these Chinese companies have even been featured in economic magazines like Forbes Global 2000 or Fortune Global 500. Source: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies Forbes Global 2000 wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Global_2000 Fortune Global 500 wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_Global_500 List of the largest shipbuilding companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_shipbuilding_companies But where are all the famous companies from Taiwan and Hong Kong?
    3
  9242.  @cx9882  I have already did several times in this comment section.
    3
  9243.  @ebolmao4129  Statistically speaking, as the world's most populous country, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and China has 4 geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Taken from the above: Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    3
  9244.  @jimjeff9852  According to Washington Post the United States has separated hundreds of thousands of people from their families by deporting more than half a million illegal immigrant parents from their children. Source: The U.S. has deported more than half a million parents since 2009 washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/09/21/this-is-what-would-happen-to-the-children-of-11-million-illegal-immigrants-if-president-trump-deported-them/ At least in China, the Uighur children are being given a proper Chinese education and once they graduate, they can be reunited with their parents in China. But the USA just tear parents away from their kids and deport them back.
    3
  9245.  @heidih6466  Chinese government only dispatch people to look out for the "journalists" (who literally broke Chinese laws by masquerading as "tourists") protection that's all. Look at what Islamic countries do to journalists, like Khashoggi being murdered by Saudi Arabian Crown Prince.
    3
  9246.  @Burtocd  If you look at thousands of years of human history, authoritarianism and oligarchies have been the most prevalent political systems that humans adopted. Political power was oftentimes held not in the hands of the masses, but concentrated in the hands of the few elites, be it nobles (aristocracy) or priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy). Its because such political systems were stable and simply because they worked. The elites were often well-educated and politically savvy enough to make decisions regarding the country's future, while the ignorant masses were kept far away from politics. Whereas democracy has a long history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, even Republic of Rome fell. These proto-democracies weren't successful, and neither was democracy popular elsewhere outside of Greece. Modern Western democracy is separate, and it only has a history of 100-200 years, so that does not mean it will be successful in the future.
    3
  9247.  @leansnscenes7806  I use logic and cite examples where possible to support my points. Why don't you attempt to refute my points instead of labeling me a ccp troll?
    3
  9248.  @starrynight5207  American kids also learn English at school, American history and sing patriotic songs about America, even the Native American kids, so how is this brainwashing? Those Uighur born in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin, Chinese history and singing patriotic songs about China.
    3
  9249.  @starrynight5207  These Uighur in Xinjiang aren't refugees, they're citizens of China, so what's wrong with teaching Uighur Chinese culture?
    3
  9250.  @S4YT3N  said "神州 Shenzhou lot of Asia hate China lol " According to Chinese inbound tourist statistics, in 2016, China received the following number of tourists from Asia. (Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourism_in_China#Visitor_statistics ) 1. Hong Kong (81 million) 2. Macau (23 million) 3. Taiwan (5.7 million) 4. South Korea (4.7 million) 5. Vietnam (3.1 million) 6. Japan (2.5 million) So what makes you think a lot of Asia hate China?
    3
  9251.  @Lu5ck  Concertina wire is a form of barbed wire so what's your point? Many Asian schools have barbed wire along their perimeter for security purposes isn't it?
    3
  9252.  @andeekhaizanhisham-8337  Here is another picture example and it says "School Fencing with Barbed Wire," (Source: profence.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/School-Fencing-with-Barbed-Wire.jpg ) and it's rather common sight along most South East Asian Schools. Seriously, have you people really not notice barbed wire fences around your own schools?
    3
  9253.  @cx9882  Look at Indonesia, world's largest Muslim population country, and Surhato banned expressions of Chinese culture through language, religion, and traditional festivals were banned and the ethnic Chinese were pressured to adopt Indonesian-sounding names. But its their country, their laws, just like our country, our laws. You don't care what happens to Chinese in Muslim countries, but you care about what happens to Muslims in China?
    3
  9254.  @sneeringimperialist6667  "神州 Shenzhou what about Tibet?" Under the Dalai Lama (Tibetan leader) rule, Tibet was brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population are slaves, while the remaining 5% elites were slave-owners. Tibetan mountainous soil was infertile, rainfall was scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the population. Starvation was commonplace, theft of food was punished by amputation, torture and even skinning. There is this Tibetan drum called damaru that consists of 2 human skulls, a drum skin made from human skin, and a drumstick made from human bone. The Dalai Lama was worshiped and his followers fight for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was seen as a divine vessel. After Tibet returned to Chinese rule, Chinese workers began rapidly modernizing Tibet, building roads, railways, highways, streetlamps, running gas and water pipelines, electricity cables, as well as modern technology like cars, appliances, telephones, computers, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (like Taobao), and so on. Under Chinese rule, the first Tibetan universities were opened in Lhasa, offering courses in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese. Hydroelectric dams were built in Tibet to provide renewable energy to houses. The Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) was built to connect the normally isolated Tibet to the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland and its population has since tripled from 1 million in 1952 to over 3 million today. Sources: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region
    3
  9255.  @cx9882  Who invaded what country you tell me? Older English-language reference works often refer to Xinjiang as Chinese Turkestan, and the name "East Turkestan" was a fake name created by the Russian Sinologist Nikita Bichurin to replace the term "Chinese Turkestan" in 1829. Who gives the Westerners the right to rename actual Chinese territory you tell me?
    3
  9256.  @nicejob4218  You really think I'm being paid just to post these comments here? Why do I have to get all emotional? Look at some of these users hurling obscenities and personal insults against me, just because my view happens to be different. I personally don't resort to hurling insults against other people just because their views differ from mine, but you are distorting my logical reasoning and citing sources, as being "robotic" in nature? Why are you using my English proficiency to accuse me of being paid by the government? With my excellent command of the English language, what even makes you think I need to resort to earning a measly 50 cents per post?
    3
  9257.  @ahmadfrankie3358  Here is Malaysian school Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Inanam and the U.S marines are helping paint a wall with barbed wire above it. Source: Students, City Hall and US Navy help brighten up school in Inanam dailyexpress.com.my/news.cfm?NewsID=131654 Here's another picture of Sailors, Marines Visit Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan High School dvidshub.net/image/5129249/sailors-marines-visit-sekolah-menengah-kebangsaan-high-school and you can clearly see the barbed wire school fence
    3
  9258.  @MrRedmer  You are always welcome to attempt to refute my points instead. I use logic to argue my points and cite sources where possible to support my arguments so am I doing anything wrong?
    3
  9259.  @onieo085  When have been joking or making hilarious comments? Did you happen to confuse my comments with the one above you? That @Red guy who said it was hilarious? Otherwise, what are you talking about?
    3
  9260.  @MrRedmer  You've been to Xinjiang? Which part of Xinjiang did you visit? Here is video of Uyghurs in Yecheng city in Xinjiang and they are getting along just fine. youtu.be/-1M_jGhcKbc
    3
  9261.  @MrRedmer  Which part of Xinjiang did your friends visit? Over 15 years ago, Xinjiang was prone to terrorist attacks like the 1992 Urumqi bombings, the 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings, the 2010 Aksu bombing, the 2011 Hotan attack, 2011 Kashgar attacks, the 2014 Ürümqi attack, the 2014 Kunming attack. But thanks to this program by the government, there have been no more terrorist attacks in Xinjiang, so isn't it an improvement? And why don't you come to Xinjiang and see what life is like for yourself?
    3
  9262.  @MrRedmer  What has Nazi propaganda even got to do with Xinjiang? Here are video of Xinjiang taken by Russian vlogger. Video: Uyghurs in Urumqi City 2018 by vlogger from Russia youtu.be/wLg20gegNiQ Video: Uighurs in Kashgar City 2018 by vlogger from Russia youtu.be/UQen6YwhwP8 So these are definitely not CCP propaganda. You never even been to Xinjiang yourself, yet you presume to compare it to Nazi Germany?
    3
  9263.  @GOOFER1947  "神州 Shenzhou is that supposed to be funny?" Excuse me, but I have been serious throughout this thread and when did I ever said anything about that being funny then?
    3
  9264.  @mylifesuckzxc  Under old Chinese laws, it was legal to harvest organs from prisoners on death row, only with the express permission of the convict. In my opinion, the person already sentenced to death, so at least the organs will be put to good use to save someone's life. But since 2014, China has abolished the practice of harvesting organs from executed prisoners and organ transplant rates in China are among the lowest in the world and waiting lists for organs are long. Source: China ends the practice of harvesting organs from executed prisoners economist.com/graphic-detail/2014/12/30/organ-harvest 如果政府想收割器官，先需要家人的许可。
    3
  9265.  @zg7215  In the past, Xinjiang was plagued by numerous terrorist attacks by misguided Uighurs, such as the the 1992 Ürümqi bombings, the 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings, the 2010 Aksu bombing, the 2011 Hotan attack, 2011 Kashgar attacks and the 2014 Ürümqi attack. But after this program started, there have been no more terrorist attacks in Xinjiang ever since. So isn't Xinjiang much safer thanks to the government's initiative?
    3
  9266.  @knowitall5913  Did Cyrus censor any posts? And if YouTube allows such functionality as censorship, then it's up to users to manage their content.
    3
  9267.  @fredjohnson2554  NATO is literally running out of weapons to send to Ukraine, while Russia has the excess military hardware and manpower to conduct military training exercises elsewhere.
    3
  9268. "A program in English about the regional foods in China would be wonderful to watch." There is a Chinese food documentary entitled "A Bite of China"《舌尖上的中国》that showcases Chinese food, eating and cooking. Its originally in Mandarin Chinese, but there is also an English dub of it.
    3
  9269. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in Australia today. Since the 19th century, many have become so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-liberal democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    3
  9270. @反共抗俄 So you're saying that it wasn't Vietnamese communists fighting to free their country from France but it was People's Liberation Army soldiers that did that? Then why isn't Vietnam under China's control today? What did the Americans do for the South Vietnamese? The Americans dropped Napalm Bombs and torched Vietnamese villages to the ground. The Americans sprayed chemical defoliants like Agent Orange, which still cause birth defects in Vietnamese children today, and at the end of the war, the Americans pulled out of Saigon, abandoning many Vietnamese wives their children.
    3
  9271.  @andrenogueira5058  Why don't you ask the Dutch and Japanese then? Currently the Dutch and the Japanese do not claim Taiwan island as part of their territory, then what's wrong with China reclaiming what was historically Chinese territory? At the start of the Century of Humiliation, China's territory was carved up (like a pie in that infamous French illustration) and divided among the Eight Nations. China has accepted that some pieces are no longer retrievable (i.e Vladivostok) but some pieces like Hong Kong and Macau have been returned. The last remaining unclaimed piece is Taiwan island, and mainland China will spare no effort to return this last piece of our territory. While you claimed the territory itself is up for grabs, the Japanese and the Dutch do not seem interested in reclaiming the island as part of their territory, then can't mainland China claim Taiwan?
    3
  9272. Those countries choose to purchase plastic bags from China, then why blame China for doing business with other countries? Other countries can always ban the purchase of plastic bags from China.
    3
  9273. Didn't Trump already signed a trillion dollar package for Americans? Or was it for the corporations?
    3
  9274. Even the United States recognize Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    3
  9275.  @laserraiset3300  "神州 Shenzhou. please don't tell me jokes, i never seen protests of farmers in eu" Because their media doesn't show you the ongoing protests across Europe, when they are in fact happening.
    3
  9276.  @laserraiset3300  Are you sure that the Americans have higher living standards? Statistics have revealed that China's life expectancy at birth is now higher than that of the U.S. So why are Chinese living longer than Americans, if America has better living standards?
    3
  9277.  @Schmuney  What makes you think Chinese government can control all 1.4 billion people of China? 其实天安门大屠杀根本没发生，西方媒体是骗人的。
    3
  9278.  @angelfire520  Why do you think it will be the end of China? Today, China is world's 2nd largest economy and still growing, whereas Hong Kong's economy is ranked 34th in the world and is currently in a slump (HK protests are expected to affect its economy even further) so how will it result in the end of China?
    3
  9279.  @bonniebrock5109  "神州 Shenzhou Does the CCP pay your salary?" What makes you think I'm being paid by the communist party?
    3
  9280.  @koblongata  Isolate China? China is literally the factory of the world, most of your goods are Made-In-China, and I've just shown that China was the world's largest recipient of foreign investment in 2020 , how is China being isolated, you tell me? And all this talk about China "copying", China is investing into Research and Development, we even have the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, just after the USA at number one. List of countries by research and development spending 1. United States ($612 billion) 2. China ($514 billion) 3. Japan ($172 billion) 4. Germany ($131 billion) 5. South Korea ($100 billion) 6. France ($63 billion) 7. India ($58 billion) 8. United Kingdom ($51 billion) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by research and development spending
    3
  9281.  @koblongata  Why aren't my comments appearing?
    3
  9282.  @sergeyb2167  Hey, why isn't your comment showing up on this thread?
    3
  9283. Many short-term visitors to China don't want to use WeChat pay, because one of the requirement is to set up a Chinese bank account (which many tourists don't want to). But hopefully with the digital Renminbi rollout, it will enable visitors to pay using DRMB and enjoy the benefits of e-payment, without the need to set up a Chinese bank account. Because the DRMB is just like RMB except in a digital form that's all.
    3
  9284.  @jaggirl  China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries.
    3
  9285.  @tonyzhan8668  The British not only colonized countries/regions, but they also colonized the minds of the locals, and even though countries have physically decolonized, the decolonization of the mind is still underway.
    3
  9286. Nobody sued America for H1N1 outbreak, which spread from America to rest of the world in H1N1 Pandemic. Neither did anyone sued USA for AIDS originating in USA and spreading to the world, so what makes you think China will be forced to pay reparations? This isn't the Boxing Rebellion era.
    3
  9287.  @INTJ791  You're using a smartphone by Chinese company Vivo?
    3
  9288.  Conan  China's first deep-sea fish farming facility Shenlan-1, has opened for salmon breeding Video: China's first deep-sea fish farm opens for salmon breeding youtu.be/NrdC7ZvfGj0 It is China's first self-developed and world's biggest fully-submerged net cage. The facility is 35 meters high with a circumference of 180 meters. It can dive between four to 50 meters and accommodate 50,000 cubic meters of water. A total of 300,000 salmon can be raised during a growth circle.
    3
  9289.  Conan  Don't worry about soybeans, China can always shun US soybeans and switch to Brazil soybeans. Source: China shuns U.S. soybeans amid trade war, turns to Brazil reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china-soybeans/crop-chop-china-shuns-u-s-soybeans-amid-trade-war-turns-to-brazil-idUSKCN1M60UT
    3
  9290.  @Andy-P  Users would probably need to state their real ID and input the correct age when they sign up for a gaming account, and the responsibility falls on the gaming companies to regulate gaming hours for children.
    3
  9291. 張五飛 Why are you accusing me of being a CCP mouthpiece? Where did I even mention the communist party of China here at all?
    3
  9292. People in China can easily access Youtube and other Western websites through the use of VPN. So many foreign companies are setting up shop in China, and many require access to Western websites to operate while in China, so why you think average mainland Chinese don't have access to Youtube? Source:90 million VPN users in China have accessed restricted social networks blog.globalwebindex.com/chart-of-the-day/90-million-vpn-users-in-china-have-accessed-restricted-social-networks/
    3
  9293. +wakzz75 Otherwise how would you describe Taiwan democracy then? Taiwan progressed rapidly under the authoritarian single party rule of the Kuomintang for nearly 70 years. Prior to KMT, Taiwan was under authoritarian Imperial Japanese rule, for about 50 years (1895-1945). I mean, can you point out how exacty did Taiwan flourish under democracy then?
    3
  9294.  @naniy7736  China notified the WHO of a strange new virus in 31st Dec 2019, and there was no indication of human-to-human transmission back in 2019, so evidence points to the novel coronavirus being not contagious. The first human-to-human transmission case in China was confirmed only on 20th Jan 2020, and that's when the government began implementing quarantine measures shortly after. Source: China confirms human-to-human transmission of coronavirus theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/20/coronavirus-spreads-to-beijing-as-china-confirms-new-cases (Dated to 20th Jan 2020)
    3
  9295.  @mabatommy  President Xi Jinping has shown to be strong and capable of governing a country of 1.4 billion (which is certainly no easy feat!) so personally I see nothing wrong with leaving him in power in order to maximise the benefits to China. Strong, capable leaders are hard to come by, and it would be a shame if a competent leader had to step down because of term limits.
    3
  9296. Is this post by the real Cyrus Janssen?
    3
  9297. It is clear that sanctions do not work on North Korea. Why continue impose sanctions, knowing that it wouldn't work? North Korea targets US military bases in South Korea and Okinawa Japan. If USA withdrew its troops and military hardware from East Asia it would do more to ease tensions along Korean peninsula, than any sanctions China could ever impose on N. Korea at all. If same method doesn't work after so many years, why not try a different approach instead? USA is the key here, not China.
    3
  9298. You got it all wrong! Most Chinese netizens actually hate the SJWs in the West. We even have our own Chinese equivalent for SJWs which we call Báizuǒ 白左 ("White Left") and named after the leftist movement in Western countries. Expats to China have also expressed the opinion that Chinese people tend not to be "politically correct".
    3
  9299.  @slomo4672  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    3
  9300.  @beastmode8203  Care to elaborate on your position? President Joe Biden himself has declared that U.S does not support Taiwan independence. The POTUS said that U.S policy towards China has not changed, in which the 1972 Shanghai Communique pledged that the U.S acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China and that the United States Government does not challenge that position.
    3
  9301. Many Indians (but not all) are still suffering from a "colonial mindset" that's been imposed on India as a result of British colonialism. Even though Britain has since physically decolonized from India, the "decolonization of the mind" among many Indians is still ongoing, with some Indians still blindly worshiping their former colonial masters.
    3
  9302.  @HarrySmith-hr2iv  You said: "After The New Wordl Order have seized The World, they will seize The Planets and The moons of Jupiter and Saturn. For infinite mineral rsources." Let's assume your prediction is accurate, then is there something wrong with this so-called "New World Order" demonstrating the technology to traverse across space and colonize other planets and moons of the gas giants in our solar system? Because under the current "Old World Order" the Global North (i.e Canada, USA, UK, Western European countries, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and other developed countries)_ are extracting resources from the Global South (i.e the rest of the developing countries of the world) and exploiting the poorer countries to keep them poor.
    3
  9303.  @echelon2k8  You mentioned Tiananmen Square Massacre, but it is a myth propagated by the British. According to an article entitled: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies (by Gregory Clark) nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    3
  9304.  @宋庆-i4m  Your statement was clearly talking about me, you wrote: "神州 Shenzhou Logically my a**... The coach as you to go undefeated. You forfeited every game so it doesn't count towards a loss therefore, undefeated right?" so you were clearly talking to me.
    3
  9305. They don't necessarily need to warm to China, but they need to at least perceive beyond what the Western media tells them about China.
    3
  9306.  @YCHTT  Sorry, I don't see any of your links. Censorship has gotten worst here, perhaps Musk should buy up YouTube and implement his freedom of speech policies on this platform as well.
    3
  9307. Peng Shuai was trying to keep a low profile and avoiding the public eye after her previous affair with a much older man has been revealed, and she has expressed the desire for personal privacy during a video call with IOC. But the WTA is trying to pry into her personal affairs and demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see.
    3
  9308.  @0IIIIII  BBC World News disagrees with you BBC World News isn't even trusted in the UK Video:youtu.be/L0oo8PsUKrA
    3
  9309.  @0IIIIII  The BBC even applied "gray filters" to vlogger Jason Lightfoot's video of China and doctored the images to make green trees appear gray in this video:youtu.be/3gI7AZFx5Q0 If anything, this already destroys the journalistic integrity of the BBC in their attempts to portray a negative image of China.
    3
  9310.  @0IIIIII  "神州 Shenzhou I don’t trust sources funded by dictatorships." Where's your evidence that vlogger Jason Lightfoot is funded by dictatorship? I've present evidence of BBC clearly "photo-shopping" images in order to portray China negatively, this already destroys the journalistic integrity of the BBC, yet you still dismiss the evidence before your eyes?
    3
  9311.  @strnglhld  "LOL! Now you are lying. She said he FORCED her to have sex without her consent." I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and she had previously known Zhang Gaoli since seven years ago, before he became a Politburo Standing Committee member. And the sex was consensual, this was what she wrote: "Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well." So since eventually she consented to the sex, then where are the allegations of sexual assault in Peng Shuai's post?
    3
  9312.  @d9918  Source: Register of Foreign Ownership of Agricultural Land
    3
  9313.  @d9918  It's available with a simple search.
    3
  9314.  @КонстантинГеоргиев-и9ф  One of the five demands is that all arrested rioters be set free. Why should Hong Kong government release those rioters who vandalise HK public property, breaking windows, security cameras, traffic lights, breaking into shops and setting them on fire, and other criminal activities?
    3
  9315.  @Andy-P  According to another source: World Statesman: Paracel Islands 15 Jun 1956: North Vietnam declares that the Xisha and Nansha (Spratly) Islands are historically Chinese territories.
    3
  9316. Deren Bong Short-sighted view? Chinese government has made 10-year plans, 15-year plans, 20-year plans to achieve specific objectives in 2020, 2025, 2030, 2040, etc so how is that shortsighted? What about USA only able to plan for 4-8 years because the presidential term limits their long term planning? If you look at history, in most societies, political power is held in the hands of the few elites, such as the nobles (aristocracy), the priests (theocracy), the kings and emperors (monarchy). This is because such people are qualified to make important political decisions regarding the future of the country. That's why such systems are common throughout history, because apparently they worked. Why have you people so against authoritarian regimes then? I read elsewhere that you are a Malaysian. but look at your neighbor Singapore. Singapore was under a dictator Lee Kuan Yew, who showed no mercy to his political enemies and ruled with an iron fist. But he transformed Singapore from poor fishing village nation into a 1st world country. So who is the short-sighted one here?
    3
  9317.  oneviwatara  Beijing is a inland city in Northern China, so how could the Laotians have founded a Chinese city so far north?
    3
  9318.  @paul-hh9oc  Chinese characters have been consistently in use since 1200 BCE (long before Christ was even born!) and today, Mandarin Chinese is world's most spoken language by number of speakers, whereas other ancient languages like Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia) Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered "dead" languages. Because they are no longer "evolving" and no new words being added to their vocabulary.
    3
  9319.  @paul-hh9oc  "神州 Shenzhou for your information the tamil language is far more older than you think" Hey, I thought you claimed earlier that Jesus Christ himself gave us language.
    3
  9320.  Jacky Phantom  How is Singapore's political system any much different from China's? Singapore is ruled by authoritarian single-party PAP for its entire life as a nation! Singapore has strict limits on speech and unauthorized public assembly and I heard in Singapore you can get arrested for illegal gathering and if you want to protest, you'll need to apply for permit (which is difficult to get) and only allowed to protest at a Speaker's Corner. So doesn't Singapore's political system seem very similar to China's in this regard?
    3
  9321.  Jacky Phantom  According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore Singapore’s political environment is stifling. Citizens face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. In 2017, the country tightened the already strict limits on public assemblies contained in the Public Order Act, which requires police permits for any “cause-related” assembly outside the closely monitored “Speakers’ Corner.” Source: Human Rights Watch: Singapore hrw.org/asia/singapore Therefore doesn't Singapore’s political system greatly resembles that of China's? Also as far as I know, China does not ban Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, etc. Nobody comes to arrest you if you access these websites while in China.
    3
  9322.  oneviwatara  Ancient Chinese invented Four Great Inventions 四大发明 which have greatly influenced the rest of the world. Paper and Printing made the recording and transmission of knowledge much easier and help to facilitate the spreading of knowledge throughout rest of the world. The Compass made navigation much easier and dangerous journeys more reliable. And Gunpowder has greatly changed the way modern wars are fought. Why is it you only use English language instead of actual Laotian language to prove your point? I clearly said earlier that names and surnames alone don't determine that Chinese culture is from Laos, and you don't even use Laotian language as your medium.
    3
  9323.  oneviwatara  How come Native Americans didn't create all those American inventions? How come Caucasian Americans don't speak Native American language? Yet do you see Native Americans claiming that Caucasian Americans are Native Americans? Thus you have clearly shown that Chinese and Laotian are separate peoples with your comment. And why you continue to use English names and surnames to draw a link, instead of using Laotian language at all? Do Laotians use English names and surnames instead of their own language?
    3
  9324. While China is looking for partners, the United States is looking for pupets.
    3
  9325. USA accuse China of potentially abusing the Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now scrapped) yet USA is blatantly abusing their extradition bill with Canada, through the Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou case.
    3
  9326. ​ @dragoblazeeditz2142 Whatever its origins, it doesn't appear to be the game that India is playing though.
    3
  9327. According to Scientific American, no one has ever reported finding a coronavirus infecting aquatic animals so whats wrong with selling live seafood, crayfish, lobsters, etc?
    3
  9328.  @Jeff-ej4wp  What Canadian sanctions did Meng Wanzhou allegedly violate? Meng pleaded not guilty and prosecutors submitted a statement of facts (pdf) asserting that in 2013 she told financial institutions the Iranian company Skycom was a partner of Huawei while knowing that Skycom was owned and controlled by a Huawei subsidiary to act as its agent in the region.
    3
  9329.  @nellyfrittata8319  I quoted actual data regarding Americans lacking access to fixed broadband Internet service, how is that factually inaccurate? On the other hand, given that you work for a satellite internet company then it's highly possible that your boast about Hughesnet satellite internet being available nationwide is part of your attempt to promote the company you work for. You said: "If people don't have internet here, it's because they chose not to." Your satellite Internet company sounds expensive, could it be that these people don't have Internet access because they can't afford it?
    3
  9330.  @ParallelComparison  You said: "In the US, if you kick a dog you will be jailed. In China, dogs are skinned alive," The consumption of dog meat is legal in 44 states of the United States. But the point should be why are you using treatment of animals as a gauge of whether a country is a "lesser evil" or not?
    3
  9331.  @ParallelComparison  You said: "In 109BC, China invaded and colonised Korea, establishing four commanderies ruled directly by the Chinese." The concept of Korea as a country didn't even exist at that point in time, it was known as Gojoseon, a kingdom founded by a man from the period of the Shang dynasty, that fled to the Korean peninsula and founded the kingdom. The Gojoseon–Han War that occurred in 109 BC, resulting in the defeat of Gojoseon and the establishment of the Four Commanderies of Han. But three of the commanderies fell or retreated westward within a few decades, but the Lelang commandery remained as a center of cultural and economic exchange with successive Chinese dynasties for four centuries. So how is it ascribed as a Chinese colonization of Korea?
    3
  9332.  @ParallelComparison  You said: "Claiming Taiwan, is not going back to the past?" There's need to go back into the past. Go and read Taiwan's own constitution today, it says that Taiwan is a part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution (nor any formal declaration of independence) then by default, Taiwan is a part of China even today. You said: "The PRC asserts that Tibet has been a part of China since the Mongol-led Yuan dynasty." Yeah well, but like you said it was the Mongols that were in charge of China at that time. 800 years ago, the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporate those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during the Manchu-led Qing Dynasty. The Han were not in charge during these periods of Chinese history, and Han culture is (generally) more peaceful, focused on the scholarly arts, calligraphy and development of Chinese characters (Hanzi) and Chinese clothing (Hanfu). If you look up maps of Han-led dynasties (i.e Song and Ming dynasty) they tend to be smaller in size than the expansionist Mongol-led (Yuan) and Manchu-led (Qing) dynasties.
    3
  9333. Marvel's Shang-Chi isn't really an example of China's soft power on the world, it's actually an American superhero film produced by Marvel Studios and distributed by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures. China didn't really had anything to do with the production of that film, and it actually appears though that Hollywood made the film to target mainland China audiences.
    3
  9334.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "They deserve the right to choose just like western people. We are no longer in colonialism anymore." The problem is that even though Western colonial powers have since renounced ownership over their former colonies, there are still local people who are stuck in a "colonial mindset" and still worship their former colonial masters. Physical decolonization may have been completed, but "decolonization of the mind" is still on-going and takes a longer time to heal.
    3
  9335.  @andrenogueira5058  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    3
  9336.  @andrenogueira5058  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    3
  9337.  @americanpatriot126  How exactly did China broke the agreement? Previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule, during which the people of Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. It's only during the period of Hong Kong's handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    3
  9338. There are so many factors to consider, such as will the Americans and Japanese accept Chinese meta technology reaching their shores? They will see it as an invasion of "Chinese Tech" whereas in China, the meta technology would already be widespread and accepted among the people. This will grant China the edge over metaverse technology that the Americans and Japanese might reject.
    3
  9339.  @drmodestoesq  How did the communists take away Hong Kong's democracy? Hong Kong currently have their own government separate from the mainland and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections, so how is Hong Kong democracy taken away, you tell me?
    3
  9340.  @danpress7745  When talents migrate from a developed country to a developing country (i.e the West to China), such a phenomena is called "reverse brain drain" and China has been experiencing reverse brain drain over the past decades as many overseas educated Chinese make their way back to the homeland.
    3
  9341.  @danpress7745  You said: "However, you will recall that South Korea and Vietnam asked the US for help after the North invaded." Both Vietnam and Korea were originally single, unified countries (Nyugen Dynasty and Joseon Dynasty respectively) but have been (needlessly) partitioned into North (Soviet Union) and the South (United States) after WWII. In Vietnam's case, it was claimed that 3 communist PT boats attacking a U.S Destroyer off the coast of Vietnam, that sparked the U.S involvement in the Vietnam War. But that justification for war turned out to be a hoax. During the war, the Americans dropped napalm bombs and torched many villages to the ground. The Americans sprayed chemical defoliants like Agent Orange, that cause birth defects in Vietnamese children 40 years after the war ended. And in the end, the Americans abandoned the South Vietnamese during the Fall of Saigon, and offered citizenship to children born of Vietnamese and American reunions. Had the U.S not gotten themselves involved in the Vietnam War, its possible that there would be far less refugees. Fast forward till today, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam is faring well, so was the U.S involvement really necessary at all?
    3
  9342.  @somaday2595  The refugee crisis in Rwanda, Darfur, Somalia were not the result of wars caused by Western nations, but they were caused by Western colonization. Also, could you point out which of my assertions are false?
    3
  9343.  @somaday2595  "神州 Shenzhou You forgot to complete the North Korean outcome." Korea was originally once a single country (Joseon Dynasty) until Imperial Japan invaded it and occupied it for 50 years (1910-1945) after which Korea was (again needlessly) partitioned into North Korea (by Soviet Union) and South Korea (by United States). Initially North Korea was the stronger nation on the peninsula and they wanted to end this humiliating division of their country, and they almost succeeded. By Sept 1950, Korea was around 95% unified under North Korea, until the U.S intervened in this internal Korean Civil War, and pushed the North Korean forces back, past the 38th Parallel and into actual North Korean territory, right up to the border with China. Seeing the enemy encroach onto China's doorstep, China eventually agreed to help our North Korean allies push the invaders back to the 38th Parallel. Till today, North Korea and South Korea are still technically at war, and over 70 years of separation has made the chances of a Korean reunification slimmer with each passing year. You said: "But the USA did not abandon S Vietnam." They did. U.S troops withdrew at the Fall of Saigon, and Operation Frequent Wind was was the largest helicopter evacuation in history. That after American troops been dropping napalm bombs and torching villages to ashes, and spraying chemical defoliants causing birth defects in Vietnamese children 40 years after. You said: "There was a peace accord signed and later broken by N Vietnam and was an extremely repressive once it controlled S Vietnam." Despite speculation that the victorious North Vietnamese would, in President Nixon's words, "massacre the civilians there [South Vietnam] by the millions," there is a widespread consensus that no mass executions took place. Then there's the issue that the US used its security council veto to block Vietnam's recognition by the UN three times, an obstacle to the country receiving international aid.
    3
  9344.  @danpress7745  NATO was initially formed in response to the Soviet Union rise, but ever since the USSR dissolution in 1991, NATO no longer serves any interest, except the U.S's interests in maintaining their hegemonic rule. NATO is expanding eastwards, having expanded into 14 countries (and with 2 more new additions). China knows that if Russia falls, China will be the next target of NATO.
    3
  9345.  Ben Louis  Doesn't have to be in monetary form, it can be in the form of favors. But no price have been named thus, that's why it's kidnapping without ransom.
    3
  9346. Majority of the Hong Kong protestors are high school kids who haven't even graduated from school, yet they already think they know how to best govern Hong Kong? Their teenage minds haven't even matured and they haven't even stepped out into the real working world of adults, yet they already gotten swept up by political fervor. Look at the rest of Hong Kong's 7 million population and they aren't protesting. Working adults continue life as normal, sending their kids to school, and going to the work. They are the ones supporting Hong Kong's economy, while the idealistic Hong Kong rioters are destroying what their parents and grandparents worked hard to build in Hong Kong.
    3
  9347. The Spratly Islands was not part of Philippines territory. When the Philippines gained their independence in 1946, the Americans reminded the Philippines that the Spratlys was not Philippine territory because the Spratlys were not part of the Philippines per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America. When Philippines drew their national boundary, they did not include the islands West of the Philippines as within their national boundary.
    3
  9348. ​ @D0MINIC7 You said: "China is in no position to call out that India should not build relationships with west ." China never said India should not build economic relationship with the West. What you described was China building an economic relationship with the USA, through Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms, Western investment, and Chinese companies selling to the West. All of which are economic in nature. China however, reserves the right to voice security concerns against countries forming military relationships that deliberately target China (such as The Quad grouping for example.)
    3
  9349. @truthreal3378 You said: "Our closer relationship with the USA is largely influenced by China’s border and territorial policies." And who drew up India-China border? It was British cartographer Henry McMahon that drew up India's border with China, the McMahon Line (named after himself) without regard for existing historical boundaries between India and China, and without consulting China. It's basically a line drawn up by a foreigner to these parts, and yet India still insists on sticking to the McMahon Line, instead of working out a new border with China that's mutually agreeable. So how is the current border dispute between India and China not related to India's colonial mentality?
    3
  9350. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    3
  9351. ​ @truthreal3378 You said: "India and the USA do share certain common interests, which have led to a closer partnership over time, first strategically and then in trade." During the Cold War period, the US capitalized on the Sino-Soviet split in order to woo China away from the Soviet Union, and USA regarded China as an ally so long as China remained poor. In the 1980s, the USA designated China as the "most favored nation" in which to trade with, and it's only when China started becoming more prosperous and stronger, did the US relations with China deteriorated to levels today. The same thing is bound to happen to US-India relations one day. You said: "the Philippines likely shares similar views to ours (India) because of the ongoing tensions in the South China Sea." The Philippines were literally colonized by the Americans after they lost the American-Filipino War which cost the lives of some 250,000 Filipino civilians and which the Philippines became an American colony afterwards. Yet because of the colonial mentality, many Filipinos have forgotten these atrocities and even till today, still think of the US as a friend while viewing China as an enemy.
    3
  9352. @nithinv5990 "Therefore, rejecting colonial history means heading towards disintegration rather than integration." Clearly that shows you're not confident enough to stand on your own two feet, and that you constantly rely on colonial maps to keep your country from disintegrating. It's gotten so bad that you cannot even make the slightest modification to colonial maps. No flexibility, only rigidity. You said: "Acceptance does not mean that we have an inferiority complex, just that we are confident enough now." Prove it then. Instead of relying on the British drawn McMahon Line, India should be confident enough now to negotiate a border with China, one that is acceptable to both sides. You said: "In that way, China also has a Western Colonial Mindset. Why does China follow Communism that originated in Germany?" Today, under President Xi Jinping, China is adhering to "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics." China tried the pure Marxist ideology and found that it wasn't suitable for China. So China has made modifications to it, drawing wisdom from 5,000 years of Chinese history to suit the ideology to China's needs and have arrived at the result today. In fact, China reached back towards the Confucian classics and found parallels between Communism and Confucius's teaching of the Great Unity (大同; Datong). According to it, the society in Great Unity was ruled by the public, where the people elected men of virtue and ability to administer, and valued trust and amity. People loved not only their own parents and children but those of other people as well. Those who were widowed, orphaned, childless, handicapped and diseased were all taken care of. Resources weren't wasted but people did not seek to possess them; they wanted to exert their strength but did not do it for their own benefit.
    3
  9353. What about credit cards used in Western countries? Making purchases now and paying by credit later is going to rack up some debts in no time.
    3
  9354. Beware! China is dangerous at night! The street food is just too irresistible that my wallet money kept on decreasing!
    3
  9355.  @vicheaith6919  Previously, Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region used to be plagued by terrorist attacks perpetrated by misguided Ughurs such as the 1992 Ürümqi bombings, the 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings, the 2010 Aksu bombing, the 2011 Hotan attack, 2011 Kashgar attacks, and the 2014 Ürümqi attack Source: 1992 Ürümqi bombings wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_bombings Source: 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings wikipedia.org/wiki/1997_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_bus_bombings Source: 2010 Aksu bombing wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Aksu_bombing Source: 2011 Hotan attack wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Hotan_attack Source: 2011 Kashgar attacks wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Kashgar_attacks Source: April 2014 Ürümqi attack wikipedia.org/wiki/April_2014_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_attack But thanks to the government program in Xinjiang, there have been no more terrorist attacks in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region since.
    3
  9356. Source: Electric car use by country wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_car_use_by_country As of December 2017, China had the largest stock of Plug-in Electric Vehicles (PEVs) surpassing even USA and Europe. In world electric bus stocks, China owns 99.5% of the world's electric buses.
    3
  9357. +PresidentialWinner Well said, China's experimental nuclear fusion reactor beat the previous record held by Germany, by sustaining a stable steady-state high confinement plasma, for 100 seconds, with temperatures 8,600 times hotter than sun’s surface, in the quest to produce abundant green energy. China's 'artificial sun' sets world record with 100 second steady-state high performance plasma phys.org/news/2017-07-china-artificial-sun-world-steady-state.html China creates artificial star 8,600 times hotter than sun’s surface hindustantimes.com/world/china-creates-artificial-star-8-600-times-hotter-than-sun-s-surface/story-npTwCWBGe4XzMsIsBq4keJ.html Imagine any place on Earth having such a high temperatures and existing for more than a minute. It truly is like an artificial sun here on the Earth itself.
    3
  9358. New York actually got their cases from Europe not Asia. New research indicates that the coronavirus began to circulate in the New York area by mid-February, weeks before the first confirmed case, and that travelers brought in the virus mainly from Europe, not Asia. “The majority is clearly European,” said Harm van Bakel, a geneticist at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, who co-wrote a study awaiting peer review. Source: Most New York Coronavirus Cases Came From Europe, Genomes Show nytimes.com/2020/04/08/science/new-york-coronavirus-cases-europe-genomes.html A separate team at N.Y.U. Grossman School of Medicine came to strikingly similar conclusions, despite studying a different group of cases. Both teams analyzed genomes from coronaviruses taken from New Yorkers starting in mid-March.
    3
  9359. Photographs and videos show that the rocket part faces the northeast, which means that the missile may have arrived the southwest, which is the direction of Ukrainian controlled territory such as Dobropillia.
    3
  9360. Most youngsters are glued to their phone screens even while out in public. Instead of trying to pry them away, why not facilitate the integration of cyberspace with real space? That's what China's Metaverse aims to achieve. Wherea's the U.S version of Metaverse aims to make cyberspace more isolated from real space.
    3
  9361.  @Winters777  Looks like you can't refute my points so you resort to hurling personal insults against me.
    3
  9362.  @Winters777  Shameless? The Philippines intentionally grounded a vessel, and refused China's help in repairing the vessel to send it on its way. Instead, the Philippines continues to send supply ships to reinforce the rusting hull of the Sierra Madre, in order to stake their claim shamelessly.
    3
  9363.  @Winters777  The Philippines believes that the label Panacot on the Velarde Map refers to the Scarborough Shoal, and it is the first map with label Panacot on it. However, Professor Li Xiaocong of China pointed out that the label Panacot in the 1734 map was not Scarborough Shoal, and the three groups of islands, Galit, Panacot and Lumbay also appeared in the map published by China in 1717.
    3
  9364.  @BINI_Maloi_Colet  Can't you see that it's the US that's trying to provoke a new conflict, this time in Asia? The US has been involved in Vietnam War, Korean War, Iraq War, Afghan War, and if the conflict goes badly, they simply pull out like the Fall of Saigon where US pulled out of South Vietnam. Or the Fall of Kabul where the US pulled out of Afghanistan, leaving behind their Afghan allies. Don't you think the same's going to happen to the Philippines if conflict breaks out in Asia?
    3
  9365.  @Winters777  I literally gave you the article detailing Duterte's gentleman's agreement, but you just pretend it doesn't exist, claiming "There's no status quo there's no gentleman's agreement", then perhaps you're the one living in imagination.
    3
  9366.  @Winters777  Who gives them the right to be world policemen? The US involved itself in Iraq War, Afghan War. Even the UN Secretary Kofi Annan said that the Iraq invasion was illegal and that it violated UN charter. Yet countries are so willing to follow the US into another war? Like how the US is trying to provoke another one in Asia?
    3
  9367.  @BINI_Maloi_Colet  Look at the Ukraine, they went against Russia thinking that the US has their back. But US has a history of withdrawing from conflicts once they lose interest. Think Vietnam or Afghanistan, and perhaps soon-to-be Ukraine, and are you sure you want Philippines to experience the same thing like the Fall of Saigon or the Fall of Kabul?
    3
  9368.  @stevenliew2507  Chiang Kai-shek's nickname was "Cash my check". He and the Kuomintang party had pocketed $750 million in U.S aid, so much such that U.S President Harry S. Truman made a remark about corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves".
    3
  9369.  @guillermosuarezperez8849  "神州 Shenzhou how can you watch YouTube if you're in China?" Just use VPN to access YouTube while in China.
    3
  9370. China seeks win-win cooperation, while the US only sees a zero sum game.
    3
  9371.  @chronokoks  Who said YouTube is banned in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    3
  9372. But does the common flu cause a patient to lose his/her sense of smell and taste, like Covid-19 does?
    3
  9373.  @SwedeenXBL  You said: "No, I find it tiresome you refer to certain reports and data because they align with you..." Does that give you reason to mock me as a "Chinese guy with a reading disability" as well as my English proficiency? You read that EU report and have been proven wrong, but instead of acknowledging it, you continue to insult me for correcting you. " but on the other hand completely ignore that investigations was done in Donbas" I already pointed out that according to UN figures, from 2018 to 2021, 81.4% of civilian casualties in the Donbas war came in rebel-held territory, so how is Russia responsible for Ukraine's war in Donbas?
    3
  9374.  @marnixbrugmans4181  "神州 Shenzhou I already did, this is my second comment on your post." In your first comment, you said that 14000 casualties is all casualties, of which the majority were soldiers, but what is the percentage? 51%? 60%? 70%? I'm asking you how do you know that the majority of the casualties were soldiers? You said: "81% of those in the territory under separatist control. Not exactly genocide, is it?" How is it not genocide when civilians are being killed in regions under separatist control by the enemy? Ukraine also banned the Russian language in Donbas, isn't that a form of cultural genocide?
    3
  9375.  @solonavi3928  "神州 Shenzhou national interest in which if a small country like singapore is ever being invaded, "friendly" countries would stand by us" But are those "friendly" countries standing by Ukraine? Or are they fighting Russia down to the last Ukrainian? If the same thing happens with Singapore, it will be your "friendly" countries fighting down to the last Singaporean.
    3
  9376.  @solonavi3928  You said: "神州 Shenzhou different. Unlike China we don't rigged our elections..." Is that so? Well, could you tell me who voted for the President of Singapore (i.e Halima Yacob) then? And what makes you think elections in China are rigged?
    3
  9377.  @solonavi3928  "神州 Shenzhou you are mistaken. Malay and mandarine are label equally as mother tongue. And we are not force to learn a 'national' language." I just looked up the Constitution of Singapore, and the national language of Singapore is Malay, so in which part am I mistaken?
    3
  9378. When you hear reports of social media leaking user's private information, it usually stems from Western social media like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc. That's why Chinese government is increasing user protections for social media operating in China, and LinkedIn is unable to comply with the new regulations.
    3
  9379.  @Vict86445  The Uyghur population in China has actually grown over the years, from 3.6 million in 1953 to 11.7 million in 2020 according to the population census. What genocide are you talking about where the population actually increase in size?
    3
  9380.  @neromeroc3793  Tibet has already been liberated. On 23 May 1951, the Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there's this legal document acknowledging that Tibet is part of China.
    3
  9381.  @YuuSHiiiN  Many Chinese come to Singapore to work, yet they get scolded for speaking Mandarin instead of English. Here's one such video: Video: Singaporean scolds worker from China for not speaking English youtu.be/ygm-SoTU6aQ
    3
  9382.  @슬라바우크라이나헤로  Many of Israel's people have dual citizenship and they have a place that they can go. However, the Palestinians in Gaza can't even leave their open-air concentration camp.
    3
  9383. Yellow Peril and Red Scare mindset
    3
  9384. Well said. Respect for the elderly is part of Chinese Confucian culture, and while Cyrus could accept the deaths of elderly people as justified, many Chinese are horrified if our elders are exposed to avoidable health risks. Loss of money and income is tragic yes, but money loss can still be earned back in the future. But once elderly people lose their lives, no amount of money can buy back those lives that have been lost.
    3
  9385.  @SakakiDash  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    3
  9386.  @rogerdodger8415  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty China and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Source: Map of Yuan Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/04/yuan.jpg Source: Map of Qing Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/06/f114660d2bf5452994135c4c.gif Tibet broke off from China in 1913 but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951, so is there something wrong with China reclaiming our ancestral lands?
    3
  9387.  @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane  Under Taiwan's constitution, Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of all the territory Taiwan claims for itself (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) So since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution, so it won't be an invasion of another country, it would be a resumption of the previously unfinished Chinese Civil War for control of over China.
    3
  9388.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou Yes, under pressure from the communists!" According to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid. "Their feeling of duress derives from the general Chinese threat to use military force again in Central Tibet if an agreement was not concluded. However, according to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid." - Tibetologist Melvyn Goldstein Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement#Repudiation_of_the_agreement
    3
  9389.  @rogerdodger8415  Previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong while it was a British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's 1997 handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    3
  9390.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "The Tibetan people choose their spiritual leader," How do the Tibetan people choose their leaders? It's basically a "lottery system" and some child is chosen as the next Dalai Lama. And the 14th Dalai Lama clearly sold out to the Americans having accepted $1,735,000 in funds from the American CIA, isn't this the smoking gun that the so-called spiritual leader is an agent of the CIA? The proof is staring you in the eye, we only know about CIA activities in Tibet after they declassified the files. About Hong Kong, they currently have their own government separate from the mainland. Hong Kong people vote in elections for their leaders, the Chief Executive Carrie Lam won the 2017 HK Chief Executive election by garnering 777 votes out of the 1200-member Election Committee (which consists of entirely of Hong Kong groups. Beijing does not cast any votes in HK's elections, they are all decided by Hong Kong people themselves, so how does Hong Kong not have democracy? Previously, Hong Kong had been under the authoritarian rule of colonial Britain for 150 years where they didn't enjoy democracy, until the 1997 handover period, that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy. Also, every country/region needs a National Security Law, even USA has their own National Security Law. According to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 (香港基本法第二十三條) It states that Hong Kong shall enact laws to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government, or theft of state secrets, to prohibit foreign political organizations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region, and to prohibit political organizations or bodies of the Region from establishing ties with foreign political organizations or bodies. The foreign political organisations part is especially important, given that USA has previously interfered in Tibet, poached the 14th Dalai Lama and funded separatist activities (see the declassified CIA files) against the Beijing. So Beijing needs to ensure that Hong Kong doesn't become susceptible to foreign political organisations like Tibet was previously.
    3
  9391.  @rogerdodger8415  I read your article about "China attacks international court after South China Sea ruling" but your article doesn't even name the court, it just claims UN tribunal or Hague tribunal, or international tribunal in the Hague. But it turns out that the court that ruled in the South China Sea was the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which is not an official UN agency it merely shares the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice, but the two of organisations are unrelated. Source: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1989486/united-nations-stresses-separation-hague-tribunal The United Nations clarified on its Chinese microblog yesterday that the tribunal that ruled against China’s historic claims over the disputed South China Sea was not a UN agency. So since the ruling wasn't made by an official UN agency, then China reserves the right not to adhere to the it's decision. What "international court" or "UN tribunal" or "Hague" Tribunal" are you talking about? It's just the PCA, a non-UN agency that made the ruling.
    3
  9392.  @rogerdodger8415  The International Criminal Court (ICC) actually found that there is insufficient evidence against China regarding the claims of genocide against Uighur people in Xinjiang. Source: ICC asks for more evidence on Uighur genocide claims theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/11/international-criminal-icc-china-uighur-genocide-claims The International Criminal Court (ICC) has asked for more evidence before it will be willing to open an investigation into claims of genocide against Uighur people by China. So what's all this claims about genocide in Xinjiang when there is insufficient evidence, where the ICC is concerned?
    3
  9393.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou WHO CARES HOW they choose their leader." So you admitted that you don't really care nuts for Tibetans at all, then why can't Beijing choose the next Dalai Lama, since the current 14th Dalai Lama is a sellout to the American CIA? I mean, how would you feel if say hypothetically, the Pope was found to be receiving money from the Communist Party of China to separate California from the USA? That's how China feels when the 14th Dalai Lama collude with foreign powers (i.e. American CIA) in training Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against Beijing. As for "DON'T INTERFERE IN OUR INTERNAL AFFAIR" you are the ones trying to interfere on Tibet here. Since Tibet is part of China (as per the 17 Point Agreement) then can't China decide the next Dalai Lama? You said: "Sending troops to the Indian border?" Indian PM Narendra Modi publicly stated that "Chinese troops did not enter Indian territory and no posts were taken." so doesn't this imply that Indian troops entered Chinese territory first, which was there were border skirmishes? Source: 'China did not enter our territory, no posts taken’: PM at all-party meet on Ladakh clash hindustantimes.com/india-news/chinese-troops-did-not-enter-our-territory-says-pm-modi-at-all-party-meeting-on-ladakh-standoff/story-QGgGUyL3sVRYB7mp3Y8bBI.html
    3
  9394.  @rogerdodger8415  What has communists even got to do with Hong Kong Extradition Bill? The Hong Kong extradition bill was proposed because of a certain incident. A Hong Kong guy named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, and stuff her body in her suitcase, before flying back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice for his crime, but Hong Kong has no extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. Source: The Murder Case That Lit the Fuse in Hong Kong nytimes.com/2019/06/15/world/asia/hong-kong-murder-taiwan-extradition.html That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to Hong Kong extradition laws. Do the HK protestors even know what they are protesting for? Have they read the bill and understood its contents in their entirety?
    3
  9395.  @rogerdodger8415  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    3
  9396.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "One day soon, the people will come to Beijing and remove the heads of the Chinese Communists." Why do you want Chinese people to overthrow our government? The collapse of the Communist Party of China would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China?
    3
  9397.  Charles Schmidd  Western perspections of freedoms, the right to assemble, and politicising mask-wearing, are the primary reasons why Covid-19 is spreading virulently in the West. Why is China able to control the Covid-19 situation in our country, where it is ravaging out of control in Western democracies like USA, UK, France, even India?
    3
  9398. I believe that there's honest, courageous, tough and intelligent people in America, it's just that under Western democracy, its catering to popularism that gets politicians elected, not the previously mentioned virtues.
    3
  9399. The Westerners have attacked our Asian self-esteem and mocked our culture as backward and inferior to theirs, but this preconception exists solely within our minds that's all. Statistics show that Asians are among the world's most diligent and intelligent peoples, with cultures spanning thousands of years. Why should we feel inferior to Westerners then? We need to shrug off this preconception and start seeing ourselves as equal to Westerners and capable of accomplishing equally impressive feat as the West. China is the 3rd country in the world to independently send people to space, after USA and USSR, and the 1st Asian nation to do so. China is also the 3rd country to have launched spacestations of our own with Tiangong-1 in 2011 and Tiangong-2 in 2016, joining the ranks of US's Skylab and Russia's Mir on the list of spacestations.
    3
  9400. It is unlikely China wants to conquer all the way to Moscow in Western Europe. China would most likely bomb the single railroad Russia uses, in order to cut off supplies to its bases in Pacific Coast region and focus on capturing that area. China would probably stop once it captures enough territory to engulf Mongolia and cut it off from Russia. That would be of great strategic value to China than taking Moscow.
    3
  9401. Back in 2010, Zhengzhou 郑州 was considered China's largest "ghost city" according to London's Daily Mail. But as of 2020, Zhengzhou has a population of 12 million inhabitants and the city had a total GDP of 1.014 trillion (RMB) in 2018.
    3
  9402.  @Albert_Einstein_not  I've often noticed that mansana bringing up Liziqi's channel too, even when it has hardly anything to do with the topic at hand.
    3
  9403. 美国小孩想当YouTuber，中国小孩却仍想上太空。 。 。 在人类踏上月球50周年前夕，乐高公司（LEGO）委托哈里斯民调公司（Harris Poll），调查在英国与美国共3000名8至12岁的孩童中，哪个职业才是最受欢迎的。他们让这些孩子从太空人、音乐家、职业运动员、老师或YouTuber中，选择一项未来最想从事的职业，结果有30%的孩子想成为YouTuber，其次是老师（26％）、运动员（23 ％）、音乐家（19％），而只有11％的人选择过去最热门的太空人。 有趣的是，这项调查在中国的孩子身上却完全不同，对于在重视科学、理工、数学的环境中长大的中国小孩来说，有高达56%的人认为，成为一名太空人才是他们的首选，而想成为YouTuber的只有16%。外媒推测，这或许跟中国近年全力发展太空领域有关。
    3
  9404.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "you have to leave China to be a youtuber." Have you heard of Chinese YouTuber 李子柒 Liziqi? Her YouTube channel has more than 2.3 billion views and 15.2 million subscribers, (as verified on May 12th 2021) which is a Guinness World Record for "the most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube".
    3
  9405.  Green Scenery  Americans paint China as the enemy in their news outlets, then don't be surprised if Chinese start treating Americans like one.
    3
  9406. Yet Singapore hosts the U.S. Navy 7th Fleet on their way to the South China Sea.
    3
  9407. If you haven't noticed, Cyrus usually changes the title after his video has been up a few days.
    3
  9408. Agreed. Quoted from The Diplomat article about the Shanghai Communique: "On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia... The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position."
    3
  9409.  @phlei95014  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Are you sure? I was in Seoul in 1988 spring before the Olympic" If you think South Korea was dirt-poor then, it was even poorer before. The Miracle on the Han River (漢江의 奇蹟) was set into motion by South Korean dictator Park Chung-hee, as I have shown in my previous explanation. You said: "Taiwan was much prosperous at the time," Yes because like I said, Taiwan was prosperous under the authoritarian single-party KMT leadership, who was responsible for the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). I've already explained how Taiwan island and South Korea both flourished under authoritarian rule, not democracy.
    3
  9410. To elaborate to English speakers, the name of the party in Chinese is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where Zhōngguó (中国) means China and Gòngchǎndǎng (共产党) means Communist Party. So the correct name should be the Communist Party of China (CCP) and not the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Similar to how it's called the United States of America (USA), and not the American United States (AUS?).
    3
  9411.  @ash_u  The next step is to prepare sufficient hospital beds for the sick and infected. Young healthy men should only experience mild symptoms (but each case is different) and priority healthcare and beds should be given to the vulnerable and elderly.
    3
  9412.  @Andy-P  It's a plan for starters. Meanwhile, the U.S has no plan to salvage the dollar, instead they are weaponizing it and freezing countries foreign reserves, making the dollar less attractive.
    3
  9413.  @SamuelMwangi-i7d  But NATO missiles stationed in Ukraine could reach Russia's metropolitan cities in hours. Putin had wanted assurances that NATO would not expand eastwards (i.e that Ukraine would not join NATO). Many NATO countries like France and Germany were reluctant to admit Ukraine into NATO (citing concerns over Ukraine government corruption) but they refused to put that down in writing to assure Putin. After realizing that for years, his words had fallen on deaf ears, Putin decided to act.
    3
  9414.  @KrunoslavStifter  Bad weather conditions clearly played a role in the Great Chinese Famine. For example, in 1958, the Yellow River flooded which coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. In July 1958, the peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 m3/s (790,000 cu ft/s) with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kg/m3 (57 lb/cu ft), 14× and 24× their mean annual values, respectively. The flood water level was so high that it rose up to the top of the levee in several places. This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. It was reported as the most severe flood since 1933. Source: 1958 Yellow River flood wikipedia.org/wiki/1958_Yellow_River_flood
    3
  9415.  @KrunoslavStifter  Since your source explicitly admits that there is no information on how many sparrows there were in China in 1958, then how can you attribute the Great Chinese Famine to Mao's Four Pests campaign? Sparrows ate grain as well, so it's possible that this campaign could have reduced the amount of grain that would have otherwise been eaten by sparrows. Also, Chinese farmers kept other insect-eating livestock like chickens and ducks, and our rice fields had frogs and fishes that eat pests as well. But without the info on how many sparrows there were in China in 1958, what you've described is at the most speculation not actual evidence that Mao was responsible for all those deaths.
    3
  9416.  @KrunoslavStifter  Under Chairman Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. China's Life Expectancy at birth under Mao nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al.) Infant mortality rate in China under Mao plummeted from 195 per thousand in 1950 to just 55 per thousand in 1980. Adult illiteracy rate also nearly halved under Mao. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Historical_population Infant mortality in China 1950-2020 statista.com/statistics/1042745/china-all-time-infant-mortality-rate/ ‘The Single Greatest Educational Effort in Human History’ languagemagazine.com/the-single-greatest-educational-effort-in-human-history/
    3
  9417.  @KrunoslavStifter  You said: "神州 Shenzhou The invasion of Imperial Japan and involvement of USA in the WWII and Asian Theater is something you still haven't explained." The U.S did not save China from Japan in WW2. When Imperial Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931 (8 years before the Nazi invaded Poland start of WW2), the Americans were content to let the Japanese conquer more and more Chinese territory. Only when Pearl Harbor was bombed did the Americans finally joined China against the Japanese, so it was not for China's sake that U.S joined WWII. In total, China fought Japan for 14 years (1931-1945) with 11 years alone. Whereas the U.S fought Japan for 3 years (1942-1945) with Chinese aid. You said: "Also who supported the Mao rebels and who supported the nationalists under Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正 蔣介石). Because Soviet Union also was involved." The communists had Soviet support, but similarly the Nationalist Kuomintang had U.S support. But KMT corruption had resulted in them pocketing some $750,000,000 worth of U.S aid, so much such that even the U.S President Truman made a remark about it and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves". Chiang’s nationalist army hoarded US aid monies, arms and material to such a degree that President Truman wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves" having stolen some $750 million dollars of US funds Source: voltairenet.org/article177063.html You said: "In the end Mao's gorilla tactics and a bit of lucky beyond his control help. I don't deny that he played a major role, but it was not a sole role or brilliance of Mao as I'm sure CCP likes to show it," I find that you apply double standards between taking away credit from Mao for his positive achievements, but at the same time, solely pinning the blame on Mao for people starving to death because of the Great Chinese Famine. Why do you attribute his success to other factors, while at the same time, ignore the other factors during the Great Famine and pin the blame solely on Mao?
    3
  9418.  @KrunoslavStifter  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Tibet broke free of China in 1913 but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951 with the signing of the Seventeen Point Agreement, so should China give up our ancestral lands, simply because Westerners say so? Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    3
  9419.  @KrunoslavStifter  The Great Leap Forward was PRC's first attempt to industrialize our country. After WWII, China was primarily an agricultural society, and Chairman Mao knew that in order for China to survive, we had to industrialize or risk falling further backward. I mean, would you have preferred China to remain a dirt-poor agricultural country forever without ever industrializing? Those backyard furnaces represented PRC's foray into metallurgy in order to gain independence from our reliance on imports of steel. If not, how else is China going to industrialize? You said: "Mao hoped to increase China's agricultural output while also pulling workers from agriculture into the manufacturing sector." Because China had plenty of farmers, but no industrial workers. How else is China going to industrialize if we don't train whatever manpower we have in the manufacturing processes? Industrial workers don't just pop out of thin air, they have to come from other stock and in this case, they came from the farmers. You said: "He relied, however, on nonsensical Soviet farming ideas," Those were crop experiments were only carried out in a few fields, and not throughout all of China. Also, there is no evidence that the farmers adopted deep-plowing. You said: "Backyard smelters run by peasants with no metallurgy training produced such low-quality material that it was completely worthless." That's because China is literally starting from scratch. We had no experienced metallurgists so we had to make do with what we have, which are peasants and if anything, those backyard furnaces helped peasants gain valuable metallurgical experience and laid down the foundation for Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms in the late 1970s. It's because those peasants have gained metallurgic experience to operate actual smelters later during Deng's economic reforms. You said: "The backyard steel production plan resulted in entire forests being chopped down and burned to fuel the smelters," Because China didn't have solar energy, wind energy, or even fossil fuels out there in the countryside to fuel those furnaces, so of course peasants turned to the most abundant fuel source which are the forests. Also, the backyard furnaces weren't left running throughout the entire year. You said: "However, so many farmers had been sent into steel production work that there weren't enough hands to harvest the crops." That's incorrect. The backyard furnaces were not left running throughout the entire year, they stopped when it comes time to harvest crops. You said: "Instead of using people who knew what they were doing, Mao used anyone available. Result was bad protection against flooding." Why would Mao "used anyone available"? There are locals who lived along the Yellow River for centuries and know how to control the flooding, why would Mao use anyone available? Central planning obviously used people who lived beside the river to build flood protection, the statement that Mao used anyone available sounds like a smear campaign. You said: "Anxious commune leaders vastly exaggerated their harvests, hoping to curry favor with the Communist leadership." So it's the provincial government's fault for exaggerating the crop yields? When Mao personally visited those fields, the local governors had workers transplant stalks of healthy grain from dying fields to healthy fields to give the illusion of a bumper harvest. That's why Mao thought there was surplus grain to export to the cities and to pay back the Soviet Union for the importation of Soviet machinery. So how can you sole pin the blame on Mao when it was the provincial governments that exaggerated crop yields?
    3
  9420.  @KrunoslavStifter  You claimed that 30 million people starved to death during the Great Leap Forward (1958-1961) but if we look at China's population statistics, China's population in was 612,241,552 in 1955 and by 1960, China's population actually increased to 660,408,054, having actually increased by 48,166,502 in just 5 years. Population of China from 1950-1965 1950: 554,419,268 1955: 612,241,552 (Great Leap Forward 1958-1961) 1960: 660,408,054 (Great Leap Forward 1958-1961) 1965: 724,218,970 ... Source: populationpyramid.net/china/1955/ So you're saying that from China's population decreased by 30 million from 1958-1961 (Great Leap Forward) yet the statistics show that from 1955 to 1960, China's population further increased by 48 million? Where did you get your exaggerated death toll figures from? Could they have been exaggerated to paint Mao in a negative light? I mean, why is China currently the country with the world's largest population then? Even under Mao, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. China's Life Expectancy at birth under Mao nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al.) Infant mortality rate in China under Mao plummeted from 195 per thousand in 1950 to just 55 per thousand in 1980. Adult illiteracy rate also nearly halved under Mao. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%.
    3
  9421.  @KrunoslavStifter  "神州 Shenzhou I think you misunderstood some of my comments," How did I misunderstood your comments? Would you have preferred China to remain a dirt-poor agricultural country forever and never industrialize at all? The Great Leap Forward represented PRC's first foray into industrialization after Chairman Mao realized that China was falling backward technologically compared to the West. As for pulling farmers to become workers in manufacturing, how else was China going to get workers if not from farmers? Like I said workers and metallurgists don't pop out of thin air, they have to taken from other occupations (in China's case, farmers) and slowly gain experienced in metallurgy. Those backyard furnaces presented valuable metallurgy experience gained by farmers who would go on to become experienced iron workers during Deng's economic reforms in late 1970s. In short, the Great Leap Forward laid down the path for China's eventual industrialization later under Deng.
    3
  9422.  @KrunoslavStifter  Let's take the Soviet model for example. Before the 1917 Communist Revolution, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe at that time, dominated by peasants whose traditional household economies were extremely inefficient compared to agriculture in Western Europe or the United States. Only about 15% of the population lived in towns, and fewer than 10% worked in industry. Russia was also technologically backward and lagged far behind advanced capitalist countries like Great Britain and Germany. But after the 1917 Communist Revolution, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe during its heyday, both economically as well as militarily (That's why NATO was formed in response to Soviet Union's rising military might). The Soviet Union was also the world's 2nd largest economy from 1960-1985. The Soviet Union also made numerous important contributions to science and technology during its time. Source: Soviet Union was world's 2nd largest economy from 1960-1985. wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_largest_historical_GDP#By_average_values_of_GDP_(nominal) Such an ideology (i.e communism) that literally transformed Russia from arguably Europe's poorest country into its strongest as the Soviet Union, and you just dismiss the Soviet model as wrong?
    3
  9423.  @KrunoslavStifter  "神州 Shenzhou 30 million is common estimation since its virtually impossible to have exact numbers because of the nature of policy," My previous source shown that China's population literally increased by 48 million from 1955 to 1960, whereas you claimed China's population decreased by 30 million during the Great Leap Forward (1958-1960)? Have you considered that perhaps Western anti-communist propaganda deliberately inflate those death toll figure to paint a negative view of communism? If you search China's Population 1955, Google gives 605 million people If you search China's Population 1960, Google gives 667 million people That means China's population increased by 62 million from 1955-1960, yet you claim China's population decreased by 30 million from 1958-1960 (Great Leap Forward)? You said: "Even if you take the low estimate of 7-10 million its a unforgivable number, because it was not necessary." Like I said, famine is famine, and in 1958 the Yellow River flooded which coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward and affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. Yet all the statistics show that China's population actually increased during the Great Leap Forward, so don't you think the figure of 30 million is deliberately exaggerated? And like I said, China's life expectancy at birth nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al.) Source: An exploration of China's mortality decline under Mao - NCBI ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4331212/
    3
  9424.  @KrunoslavStifter  You said: "This is not true. Russia was far from backward country, it was a great civilization" Great civilization or not, pre-1917 Russia was technologically backward (that's the point I'm making), with agriculture providing the livelihood for 80% of the population and only 15% of the population lived in towns, and fewer than 10% worked in industry. It's similar to how China is a great civilization, but we were also technologically backward compared to the West during the 19th century. You said: "It was far from backwater, it was very rich culturally but it was not industrialized." Who said anything about backwater? I wrote "Russia was also technologically backward and lagged far behind advanced capitalist countries" yet you bring up cultural richness out of nowhere? And the fact that you admitted Russia wasn't industrialized proves my point. You said: "As for industrialization of Soviet union. At what cost. 20 + mil dead in WWII," How is the 20 million who died during WWII somehow the Soviet Union's fault? What logic is this? The Soviet Union fought the Nazis during WWII and while they suffered the most casualties, the Soviet Union also inflicted the most damage onto the Germans, who suffered three-quarters of their wartime losses fighting the Soviets. So shouldn't we be thankful for the USSR's intervention in WWII, rather that blaming them like you are? Source: Don’t forget how the Soviet Union saved the world from Hitler washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ You said: "Surly if the goal was to strengthen Russia there are better ways." Communist ideology literally transformed pre-1917 Russia from arguably the poorest country in Europe into its strongest as the Soviet Union. I don't know why you rather choose to dismiss the ground facts, that the Soviet Union was not only militarily the most powerful in Europe (that's why NATO was formed) but also economically the strongest in Europe (ranking the world's 2nd largest economy from 1965-1980. Source: Soviet Union was world's 2nd largest economy from 1960-1985. wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_largest_historical_GDP#By_average_values_of_GDP_(nominal) Had the communists not gained control of Russia, it's possible that Russia would remain technologically backward as it was pre-1917. ... (The last few paragraphs of your comment are just "statements" taken by anti-communists, while ignoring the facts that Russia had transformed into the economic and military power that is the Soviet Union under communist party leadership.)
    3
  9425.  @KrunoslavStifter  What strong argument have you presented at all? You brought up Mao's Four Pests Campaign, but you don't even know the number of sparrows in China at that time, which already reduces your argument to just speculation without concrete facts. You said: "nor does the increase in number of people equal *standard of living increase.*" But China's standard of living did increase under Mao. For example, China's growth in life expectancy at birth from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al. 1984; Coale1984; Jamison 1984; Banister 1987; Ravallion 1997; Banister and Hill 2004). Source: An exploration of China's mortality decline under Mao - NCBI ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4331212/ You said: "Furthermore, after Mao died, China was economically it bad shape, and it was not the Mao economics that gave economic boost to China," China's GDP actually increased under Mao, growing from just $30.55 billion (USD) in 1952 to $306 billion in 1980, so how was China economically in bad shape, when China's GDP increased tenfold? Here's a graph of China's GDP growth from 1953 to 1980 China's GDP from 1953 to 1980 1952: $30.55 billion 1953: $31.66 billion 1954: $33.02 billion 1955: $35.01 billion 1956: $39.58 billion ... 1976: $153.94 billion 1977: $174.94 billion 1978: $218.50 billion 1979: $263.70 billion 1980: $306.17 billion ... Source: Historical GDP of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_GDP_of_China
    3
  9426.  @KrunoslavStifter  The Earth's resources are limited but under capitalism, there is no regard for sustainability, nor welfare of the workers, nor the environmental impact. It's the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, with the end goal being the eventual depletion of the Earth's resources. It's a pity, because our modern industrial capabilities allow us to produce enough food, medicine, houses, schools, for everyone on the planet. Yet we still have starving people, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to adequate healthcare. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As you said: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs". Imagine if we had a system that distributes material needs according to the urgency. While capitalism seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, communism seeks a more efficient distribution method according to needs.
    3
  9427.  @KrunoslavStifter  It's a fact that under communist party leadership, pre-1917 Russia transformed from a technologically backward society into the economic and military superpower that is the Soviet Union, turning what was arguably Europe's poorest country into its strongest as the USSR. Even today, long after the USSR's dissolution, we are still feeling the effects of communist ideology in Russia today. You said: "But I guess communists brainwashing is the one thing communist excelled at." All this time, you've been making insinuations against me being brainwashed, but I have provided data and statistics where appropriate to support my arguments. Why not resort to attacking my points rather than making such insinuations about me? You said: "And speaking of economy. Communist are terrible at it, what they are good at is brainwashing people to think otherwise." The communists transformed Russia's pre-1917 agricultural economy into one of industry, making the Soviet Union the world's 2nd largest economy during its heyday. Source: Soviet Union was world's 2nd largest economy from 1960-1985. wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_largest_historical_GDP#By_average_values_of_GDP_(nominal) Even China under Mao had our GDP increase tenfold, from 30 billion in 1952 to 300 billion in 1980. Source: Historical GDP of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_GDP_of_China Yet you claimed that China was economically it bad shape after Mao died?
    3
  9428.  @KrunoslavStifter  About the religious aspect of Marxist teachings, what exactly has some mysterious entity up above ever done for China or for Chinese people, that we should worship it so? There is this phrase in Chinese: 世上没有从天而降的英雄，只有挺身而出的凡人。 which translates to: "There are no heroes falling from the sky in this world, only ordinary people who step forward." which means we shouldn't depend on the heavens to help us, the true heroes are those who step up to the challenge. This is probably one reason why Marxist views towards religion seem to resonate with Chinese beliefs.
    3
  9429.  @KrunoslavStifter  It seems that you're still unable to counter the fact that the communists transformed pre-1917 Russia from a technologically backward society into the economic and military power that was the Soviet Union after the communist revolution. And I've actually cited data In China's case, after the KMT fled the mainland, Chairman Mao did seize the lands from the rich landlords, but he redistributed it among the poor peasantry, and as a result, many peasants in China found themselves freed of having to pay taxes to the rich landlords, and actually owning the lands they worked on. Since the landlords were the minority in China at that time while the peasants made up the majority, the end result is that there's actually an overall increase in private property ownership, since the peasants now have land to call their own. That's why every Chinese has our laojia (老家) our native plot of land that we can return to, especially during the Spring Festival (Chinese New Year). It's because of Mao's seizure of lands from the landlords and distribution of land among the peasantry. You said: "It can only end one way. Mass starvation." Look, both you and I agree that there was bad weather conditions involved in the famines, such as the Yellow River flood in China causing destruction of crops and resulting in mass starvation. No one intended for bad weather (not even Mao, whom you like to keep on blaming) and even during the Soviet Famine there was bad weather like drought. The point is that both Russia and China were primarily agricultural countries that were industrializing, so our industrial workforce had to come from somewhere and that's why farmers were recruited to work in industry. Would you have preferred both Russia and China to remain agricultural countries forever and never industrialize?
    3
  9430.  @KrunoslavStifter  You said: "Maybe that is because WWII destroyed just about every other economy except American." Which country suffered the most casualties out of WWII? You literally answered it when you brought up Soviet Union suffering over 20 million deaths during WWII. Yet you somehow blame it as the Soviet Union's fault when you said: "At what cost. 20 + mil dead in WWII,"? And the Soviet Union even inflicted the most damage onto the Nazis, who suffered three-quarters of their wartime losses fighting the Soviets. So shouldn't we be thankful for the USSR's intervention in WWII, rather that blaming them like you are? Yet despite the USSR suffering the highest death toll, the Soviet Union eventually rose to become the world's 2nd largest economy after the USA (whose economy was relatively untouched like you said). You said: "As for contrast in economies, East vs West Berlin should provide clear example." There's a lot of context to this scenario. As we mentioned earlier, the Soviet Union suffered the highest death toll out of WWII, so naturally Stalin wanted East Germany to pay reparations for causing so much death. The rest of the Western countries realized from WWI history that the exacting of reparations from Germany was what caused the rise of Hitler and Nazi Germany, so instead, the U.S came up with the Marshall plan to develop West Germany's economy. Stalin was alarmed by the West's move. His think was along the lines of "the Allies fought hard to capture Germany, now you wanted to make Germany great again?" So he gave out the order for the military to block any connection between East and West Germany as to get the Western powers to reconsider their actions. But this was a problem because West Germany relied on importing food from Eastern Germany, and eventually the Berlin Wall fell with the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Long story short, East and West Germany didn't really have much to do with the different system, it was because Germany was part of the Axis, and that both sides have a different approach as to how to deal with the defeated country.
    3
  9431.  @KrunoslavStifter  You said "China was in terrible shape economically after Mao," You have yet to prove your claim, whereas I've shown that China's GDP increased tenfold from 30 billion in 1952 to 300 billion in 1980. You had also earlier talked about the quality of living of China, and my response is that China's life expectancy at birth under Mao nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980. Under Mao, Infant mortality for children under one year of age plunged from 195 per thousand in 1950 to 55 per thousand in 1980. If anything, this data suggests that the quality of life for many Chinese improved under Mao. China's education system had also improved under Mao. When Mao proclaimed the founding of PRC, the illiteracy rate of China stood at roughly 85-90% when it was first calculated at the turn of the 20th century, and it began to decrease significantly from the 1950s onward. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%. The Cultural Revolution had made it possible for more peasants to receive an education, and similarly, women were also granted access to education. "Women hold up half the sky" (妇女能顶半边天) is one of Mao's sayings, and women were often featured prominently alongside men in Cultural Revolution posters. You said: "Whatever you think CCP has done to make lives of people better, imagine where people would be if CCP did not caused them all the problems in the first place and did not rob them and oppress them." If not for Chairman Mao and the Communist Party of China, there would literally be no China today. It was Mao and the communists that succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country, when even the earlier Nationalist KMT administration failed to achieve for 37 years prior. I just cannot emphasize the enormity of the task of reunifying China. If not for the communists, China today would most likely be the weak and divided country we were during the ROC, fighting among ourselves instead of the strong unified country we are today. I don't understand why you keep on insinuating that I'm brainwashed, when I cite numerous sources, data, statistics, etc to support my arguments. On the other hand, your posts are full of hate towards Mao, towards Stalin, towards communism without any attempt to at least understand it, except for quoting anti-communist phrases by others.
    3
  9432. In China, you can do many things with your smartphone such as make payments, shop online, make purchases, have them delivered to your doorstep, order food, book dental appointments, book taxis, pay the fare, etc. Even the poorest farmer in Lhasa can have smartphone and order stuff from Taobao and have it shipped all the way to mountainous Tibetan plateau.
    3
  9433. +AM Life Why do you say largest part China population still live in poverty? According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012, so why still claim largest part of Chinese population are still living in poverty? Sure, its not 0%, but remember that China is world's largest population, so reducing poverty from 88% to 6.5% is astonishing feat. If every Chinese person somehow attained living standards as that of USA, then it could be possible that Earths resources would be depleted to sustain such large population at such high living standards. If you claim "free environment" needed to grow, then why not look at India, world's largest democracy. It has world's 2nd largest population and Republic of India was democratic since 1947, whereas People's Republic of China founded 2 years later (1949) than India. Yet China mostly overtaken India in virtually every aspect, so what makes you think that China would somehow be better under democratic system? As for Singapore, Hong-Kong, Macau, Japan, South Korea, most of them were ruled by authoritarianism at one point in their history which led to their growth. Singapore was ruled by authoritarian Lee Kuan Yew, and South Korea by Park Chung Hee. Even ROC (Taiwan) while claiming be "democratic" was ruled by Jiang Jieshi for many decades before free elections were held in ROC. The common thing shared by all these countries during their authoritarian rule, was that the country experienced tremendous economic growth during this period. Even today, China's economy is largest than all of them, and economies in Japan and Hong-Kong are said to be declining. I don't understand why you think a radical change in leadership, will somehow solve the economic issues of the country. You think American citizens angry at USA economy are doing the right thing, when they radically vote Trump into power to "Make America Great Again"? True, the whole US system isn't changed, but the leader can always revoke policies made by previous political party. For example, President Obama spent 8 years planning and developing the Trans Pacific Partnership, only for Trump to take over and cancel the TPP, simply because Trump disliked Obama (Obama humiliated Trump with his birth certificate) Because of his actions, 8 years of taxpayers money suddenly went down the drain just like that, because of one man's actions. So how exactly does changing the leader result in better policies? As for China's system, the government always present united front, and any good policies reflect well while bad policies reflect badly. For example, the communist party has to live with the consequences of Mao's policies and because of this, new measures such as age-limits are introduced to prevent people from attaining too much power. Also, the party supports long term policies, like the Belt and Road Iniaitive, which will take decades, even centuries to fully manifest, but China can achieve this, because our government is still expected to remain in power even after decades later. But US government changes every 4-8 years, so it is impossible for USA to have any long-term policies for the country spanning more than 8 years, without another person coming into power to sabotage it. China has many problems of our own like pollution, corruption and so on, but what makes you think giving people more liberties will somehow make them happier? Once you grant someone liberty, it is extremely difficult to retract it. For example, in America, there are loose gun laws, and every citizen has a right to bear firearms. Because of this, it is easier to commit crime like robbing banks, due to availability of guns to the public, than in other countries with stricter gun laws. American Policemen also encounter more danger in their work, due to higher possibility of suspects being armed. The American government is having difficulty in introducing stricter gun laws, because doing so will be seen as taking away people's freedoms in the American citizen's eyes. Therefore, from the American gun law example, I would say China is in no hurry to introduce such liberties to the common Chinese people, if it can be avoided. For example, China is slowly shifting from fossil fuels by stopping any more of such plants being built. But in America, the fossil fuel and petroleum industry are so big, that banning fossil fuels is going to be quite impossible to achieve in such short time. China poised to ban new coal-fired power stations afr.com/news/china-poised-to-ban-new-coalfired-power-stations-20160711-gq3izc
    3
  9434.  @dagsmoko3889  Your proposed idea of parallel development (rural + urban) means that resources will be stretched thin, and growth will be half the rate it is today. Why not focus on developing the urban areas (especially the port cities) first, before slowly spreading the wealth towards the rural areas later (through the Belt and Road Initiative)?
    3
  9435.  @dagsmoko3889  Welcome back? I was on the thread and posted above you. About agriculture in China, China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. Source: Fishing Industry in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishing_industry_in_China China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_producing_countries_of_agricultural_commodities So what has not being able to vote even got to do with China's agricultural developments?
    3
  9436.  @dagsmoko3889  How does China make a low priority of agriculture and rural development? For example, in light of the African Swine Flu, Chinese researchers successfully developed facial-recognition technology for pigs so that farmers can manage their pigs better and monitor their livestock health. Farmers can receive the information about the pig's number, its parents and species from a single scan, this help identify pigs that have been infected with possible swine flu. Video: Chinese researchers develop facial recognition technology for pigs youtu.be/5i3H4oEKCO4 Yet you claim China isn't willing to develop our agriculture when our government is applying technology to farming in China?
    3
  9437.  @dagsmoko3889  About agriculture development, China has unveiled our first self-driving tractors to help our farmers improve agricultural efficiency. The "Super Tractor 1" is electric and self-charging, equipped with a smart control system so it is able to navigate it's return to a charging point for recharge Video: China's first self-driving electric tractor unveiled youtu.be/4b2YJfP0-Wg Yet you claim China isn't interested in developing agriculture, when our government is investing in agricultural technologies?
    3
  9438.  @PLA69  What's wrong with that elderly communist member wanting to promote his poor village's agricultural produce to buyers on live stream? That elderly gentleman is willing to learn modern live-streaming technology and he's done more for his village than you overseas Chinese ever did for China, you had wealth and choose to go overseas and ignore your homeland.
    3
  9439. +Narendra Modi You explicitly said that "India has the power to decide Bhutan's foreign policy" and then claim that India doesn't exploit Bhutan? Aren't you contradicting yourself here? Can't you see that Bhutan is becoming Indian puppet state here, or do you just apply double standards to China and India here? Bhutan is its own sovereign country and therefore, China's interactions with Bhutan are bilateral (country to country) in nature. It wouldn't be sovereign anymore if it allows other countries like India to dictate its foreign policies isn't it? Why does India interfere with Bhutan-China issues then, when India does not even claim Doklam as part of its territory?
    3
  9440.  @John77Doe  You Americans contribute more than 10x the amount of money to the World Health Organization than China, yet you still claim that the WHO is in China's pocket? How? When USA is WHO's largest contributor?
    3
  9441.  @TulekBehar  那你有其他更好的办法吗？说出来让大家听吧。
    3
  9442.  Beast Mode  USA's catastrophic withdrawal from Afghanistan has shaken U.S allies belief, and NATO's unwillingness to put boots on the ground to defend Ukraine shows the US unwillingness to go to war with Russia, what makes you think USA will go to war with China?
    3
  9443. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    3
  9444.  @user-nj4hn2ft5q  Why are you copying Cyrus Janssen's profile picture and username? You're not the real Cyrus Janssen!
    3
  9445.  Edmund Kemper  If Canada treat China like an enemy, then why should China treat Canada like a friend? All Canada needs to do is release Meng Wanzhou and put her on the first flight back to China and China-Canada relations can finally start mending.
    3
  9446. American healthcare workers look overwhelmed, overworked, exhausted, ill-equipped and facing shortage of masks, gloves, goggles, faceshields, PPE suits whereas Chinese doctors and nurses look well-equipped by comparison.
    3
  9447.  @MarkYeung1  China should do the opposite of decouple. In fact, China should strive to deepen economic ties with the rest of the world. However, U.S treasury bills pose a potential risk, so China is derisking by slowly getting rid of them over time.
    3
  9448.  @xxxcool2565  Having a Jewish president doesn't mean that neo-Nazis don't exist. It's like the United States elected an African American for President, yet racism against African Americans still exist in the USA.
    3
  9449.  @xxxcool2565  What millions killed in Xinjiang? The population of Uighurs in China has actually grown from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China Yet the Western allegations of Uighur genocide still persist? When the population of Uighurs in China actually tripled in size over the years?
    3
  9450.  @xxxcool2565  "神州 Shenzhou why would Russia care about what an independant nation like ukraine is doing?" Look back to the 1962 Cuban missile crisis and Soviet had deployed missiles in an independent nation like Cuba during that time, and yet U.S President Kennedy did not back down in his stance, and he was applauded by Americans for it, until the Soviets eventually withdrew their missiles. In the same way, Ukraine represents the same security interests to Russia as Cuba did for the USA, that's why Putin has been asking for reassurances that NATO would not expand eastward (i.e that Ukraine would not be allowed to join NATO).
    3
  9451.  @ne0ge049  If you claim Taiwan is independent country, then where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? If not, then since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    3
  9452.  @ColoniaMurder20  The Yue people in Southern China were not Austronesian people. No, they were a mix of Hmong-Mien, Austroasiatic, Tibeto-Burman, Kra-Dai, extinct groups, and pre-Austonesians. None of them were Austronesians. Austronesian people originated from a prehistoric seaborne migration, known as the Austronesian expansion, from pre-Han Taiwan, circa 1500 to 1000 BCE. So the the ancestors of Indonesian, Filipinos and Malaysia did not flee because of Han Chinese expansion, they were already settled in their respective regions for around a thousand years before Han Dynasty in 220 BC.
    3
  9453.  @fireturkeyfly11  Why call it the "International" Space Station, when Chinese scientists and astronauts are excluded from it? Are Chinese somehow not part of the international community? We represent around a fifth of humanity yet we are barred from the ISS?
    3
  9454. I have been to Singapore before, and some of them (not all) do harbor a negative impression of China. When I speak Putonghua, many Chinese Singaporeans can detect the mainland accent and some started treating me coldly. But when I open my mouth and speak English, many Singaporeans treated me warmly.
    3
  9455. During the Bronze Age, while other nations were casting bronze weapons like shortswords, Chinese was casting enormous bronze bells and cauldrons called Ding (鼎) as well as small intricate crossbow trigger mechanisms. Here is a video about Bianzhong (编钟) which is a massive set of bells of various sizes use for ceremonial rituals in ancient China and have been dated at between 2,000 to 3,600 years old Bianzhong: Performance on Traditional Chinese Bells Video:youtube (dot) com/watch?v=zhcCSeRj2PU
    3
  9456. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    3
  9457. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    3
  9458.  @vegahimsa3057  Video: The Wuhan Virus Is Not a Lab-Made Bioweapon foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/29/coronavirus-china-lab-mortality-virology-wuhan-virus-not-bioweapon/
    3
  9459.  @sunnyinmilkyway2114  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    3
  9460. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have long since faded to history. Chinese written language been in use since 1200 BC, and is still widely used today, whereas other ancient languages like Sumerian Cuneiform, Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered dead languages today.
    3
  9461.  @ne0ge049  War is coming? Didn't U.S General Mark Milley made a phone call to his Chinese counterpart (General Li Zuocheng) to assure him that the U.S will NOT launch an attack on China?
    3
  9462. About the One Child Policy, in the past China was still dirt-poor country, suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems at that time. Why allow families in China to raise multiple kids, only for them to starve to death, succumb to childhood diseases, and having not enough food, not enough hospitals, and not enough schools to send them all to? Why not make families focus all available resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood, and get him into a good school? According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china Look at India, world's 2nd largest population country, and India is suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems that China once suffered from in the past. So it's thanks to the One Child Policy that China managed to lift millions out of poverty.
    3
  9463.  @douglasman2011  Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong can't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he'll wish for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. Also where did you get your bloated figure of 60 million dead during the Great Leap Forward (1958—1962)? According to the following source, China's population in 1955 was 612,241,552 and by 1960, China's population was 660,408,054 having actually increased by 48,166,502 in 5 years. Source: Population of China in 1955 populationpyramid.net/china/1955/ So you're saying that during the Great Leap Forward (1958—1962) China's population decreased by 60 million, but from 1955—1960, China's population actually further increased by 48 million? Where did you get your bloated figure of 60 million dead during Great Leap Forward then?
    3
  9464.  @douglasman2011  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    3
  9465.  @aimer3042  China is donating medical supplies to other countries affected by Covid-19. Video: Jack Ma donates 500,000 coronavirus testing kits and 1,000,000 masks to the US youtu.be/t4it58bem6I Video: Chinese donate half a million masks to Italy to aid coronavirus fight youtu.be/tQQa7RUKXzs Video: Chinese donate 70,000 masks to Japan to aid coronavirus fight youtu.be/cYkYHauUmwo Video: 300,000 China-donated masks arrive in Belgium youtu.be/B0oxcoh9rDo
    3
  9466.  @NNNgocNguyen  Here's a look inside Chinese BYD mask factory producing 5,000,000 masks a day in bid to supply shortfall. Video: youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw?t=15
    3
  9467.  @NNNgocNguyen  The Chinese government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and halt production, closing tourist attractions, imposing lockdown, banning mass gatherings, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and contain the virus. Now it's finally paying off that the virus is under control in China and we are cautiously reopening our economy. But in Western countries like US and UK, their economies are far too precious to sacrifice so human health has to be sacrificed instead. Donald Trump wants to reopen the economy by Easter and Boris Johnson is relying on "herd immunity" to the pull through. So human lives have to be sacrificed instead of the economy.
    3
  9468. The oldest church in Gaza was reduced to rubble by IDF forces. Yet you don't see many Christians feeling too upset about that in the west.
    3
  9469. Nepal knows that if India and China do go to war over this territorial spat, then it will only suffer as it is forced to pick sides. If China goes to war, we know PLA troops are dying for territory claimed by China. If India goes to war, then Indian troops will be dying on foreign soil, that India itself does not claim at all.
    3
  9470. vamshi krishna Donglong has long been part of Chinese territory. The government is building roads there to serve as second path for Indian pilgrims travelling to Kailash and to possibly Lhasa in Tibet. The current route is extremely congested and unsafe and this new road will help ease congestion and make travel safer for Indian pilgrims travelling to Tibet. China has no interest in war with India. War would hurt our growing economies and destroy decades of progress here in Asia. King Mohan China sends PLA troops to Pakistan to defend our construction projects there. We have economic corridor initiative to help build infrastructure in Pakistan and to develop their economy. It's a significant investment, so the government is taking steps to protect our assets there in Pakistan from terrorists and possible sabotage.
    3
  9471. +King Mohan But war is not best course of action for India here. Firstly, India does not claim Donglong/Doklam as part of India, so why send its troops there to die on foreign soil if war breaks out? Secondly, India's economy still growing, and war is extremely expensive affair. Rich country like USA can afford to have so many wars in Middle East, which estimated cost American taxpayers $3 trillion dollars to support war effort. But can India or China afford such a war breaking out in Asia, and costing us decades of progress? Lastly, while India and China are fighting, Pakistan may take this opportunity to expand while India is distracted, probably in disputed regions like Jammu and Kashmir. Can India afford to fight a war on more than one front? India won't gain Doklam for itself, and may possibly end up losing territory to Pakistan. The final note, is that both our nations are nuclear states, and a nuclear war will only decimate Asia and leave radioactive fallout that will plague Asia for generations, like Japanese cities bombed by USA that are still suffering aftereffects even till today. It is with these reasons why I imply that going to war is no good for both our countries.
    3
  9472. The government has made 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans to map out China's futures and to achieve specific goals in 2020, 2030, 2050, etc, and having no limits, means leaders can concentrate on implementing these plans. But US presidential term limit is only 4-8 years, so they only plan short term, and then step down and let someone else take over the reins instead. How to make long-term plans like that?
    3
  9473.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou If you look at the WTO terms of reference file" What has the World Trade Organisation even got to do with this discussion? And if obviously can't access your computer to view the file, I am asking whether you can guarantee that USA will allow an independent investigation into the possible origins of COVID-19 in Fort Detrick that's all.
    3
  9474. Casper Cito But why are you talking about baby formula and skin care products, and about Chinese women dating foreigners, when the topic is about cars in China?
    3
  9475.  @abbotsful  Majority of China's agricultural imports is actually soybeans (which is used as animal feed) so your statement that China imports twice as much food as it exports isn't really accurate. As for rice being a net export, rice is a staple in many countries and if there's to be a food shortage in China, of course China could use the rice exports to feed our own population during such a shortage, and other countries that depend on Chinese rice will be affected.
    3
  9476.  DONOLD DUCK  Nevertheless, Chairman Mao is still poorly understood among many Westerners, they only see the negatives and ignore all the positive things Mao Zedong contributed to China. If not for Mao, China would most likely remain weak and divided, continually fighting among ourselves, like during the ROC 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period, instead of the strong, unified civilization today known as PRC 🇨🇳.
    3
  9477. ​ @testusersg  I have spoken to people in Malaysia to get their side of the story. Singapore was the one practically begging Malaysia for merger (starting with David Marshall), whereas Malaysia initially didn't want merger and only reluctantly agreed in the end. Yet how did Singapore repay Malaysia? By causing all manner of trouble for Malaysia, such as imposing Singapore policies onto the whole of Malaysia, yet you don't see this as stirring up trouble? Why should all of of Malaysia follow the policies put forth by Singapore? You join a Federation but seek to impose your will against the others? The Malays in South East Asia represent the indigenous population, the Bumiputera, as compared to the Chinese. Yet in Singapore's education system, the Malays are academically underrepresented and tend to occupy the lower rungs of their education system. So the Malays in Singapore are actually at a disadvantage compared to those in Malaysia. You said: "Look at China, everyone is equal. There is no "special status" for Han Chinese. All Chinese are equal in the eyes of the law." That's incorrect. Us Han Chinese are actually at a disadvantage compared to ethnic minorities who enjoy benefits such as tax exemption, priority in healthcare, free education for 15 years (9 years for Han) and exemption from the One-Child Policy, meaning that ethnic minorities can have as many kids as they want. You said: "And even miniorities have more benefits than the majority." Exactly, then how can you say in China everyone is equal when ethnic minorities enjoy more benefits than the majority Han? Aren't you contradicting yourself here? You said: "Fact is, LKY's policies are attractive and makes more sense to the people, that is why UNMO is worried. Because their policies is clearly inferior." LKY's policies were suitable for Singapore, but not for the rest of Malaysia. Claiming that Singapore is not race-based but merit-based is the biggest myth and a public relations exercise that Lee and the American media have created. It's cosmetic window dressing - like many things in Singapore. Deep down it is one race. All the heads of major civil service divisions, judiciary and the armed forces are from one race - just like in Malaysia. You said: "And they eliminate the competition by removing SG." Well, Malaysia initially did not want merger with Singapore, it only did so reluctantly, so why should Malaysia continue to hold on to Singapore when Malaysia can survive without Singapore in the first place?
    3
  9478.  @testusersg  You said: "SG education only tell the facts. They don't paint m'sia as the enemy like what m'sian politicians do." Claiming that Singapore's education only tells the facts is being rather naive in itself. Singapore's education system is designed to foster patriotism towards Singapore, so if tells the good side of Singapore while downplaying the negative, attempting to redirect blame elsewhere (esp. towards Malaysia) rather than blame the government. And the fact that all this while, you've been regarding Malaysia as the (perceived) enemy already spells the truth that your education system is designed to subconsciously plant that idea in your mind. Weren't you the one who brought up statements such as: "(such as the one always threatening to cut our water supply)."? You said: "Everything that was reported in the news about m'sia are facts understand?" Blind allegiance into believing everything Singapore media says about Malaysia is dangerous. Singapore's MSM is considered to be highly controlled by the government, that's why your media tries to paint Malaysia as the perceived enemy to Singaporeans, in order to redirect blame away the government. But it seems that you've just blindly bought into thinking everything Singapore MSM says about Malaysia is fact, without bothering to do research You said: "Go and check if up yourself if m'sian PM said there are many ways to skin a cat (referring to SG)" I checked it out, and it turns out that the then Malaysian PM Mahathir's remarks were made in the context of growing competition for investments between the two neighbours. Such statements should be taken in stride, pointing out that "skinning the cat" has been one of Mahathir's favourite phrases in media interviews even on issues not related to Singapore. You said: "Go and read the news if m'sia threaten to cut our water supply." I've looked it up, and it turns out that Malaysia never actually threatened to cut Singapore's water supply, only seeking to renegotiate the terms. In an interview with Bloomberg published on Monday, Dr Mahathir said water is among issues with Singapore “that we need to settle”, adding: “We will sit down and talk with them, like civilised people.” (How is that threatening?) "I think it is manifestly ridiculous that you should sell water at 3 sen per thousand gallons. I mean, that was okay way back in the 1990s or 1930s, but now, what can you buy with 3 sen. Nothing," Mahathir said. Also in the first place, Malaysia is under no obligation to supply Singapore with water since Singapore's separation from Malaysia. If anything, Singapore threatening to go to war with Malaysia if Malaysia stops supplying water is almost akin to pointing a gun at someone and demanding that they supply water to you. You said: "Stop making up lies on this youtube channel." Could you point out which of my statements are lies?
    3
  9479.  @testusersg  You said: "Saying m'sia doesn't do that is simply naive or lying." Yeah, but did I ever said that? It seems the one with blind allegiance to Singapore media here is you, because earlier you said (and I quote your own words): "SG education only tell the facts." -"Everything that was reported in the news about m'sia are facts understand?"_ ... So who is the one truly being naive here? You said: "So, are you trying to say China state media portraying of USA is lying?" No I never said that. You're seemingly employing the strawman fallacy where you replaced my argument with a fake one and then attack that false argument because you're unable to refute my original argument that's all. You said: "Your accusation of Sg media distorting facts against m'sia is simply baseless. substantiate it with credible evidence if you want to make such an accusation." I searched online for "Malaysia threatening to cut off Singapore Water" and could find no concrete example, except from Singaporean Media. They don't even quote the exact words Mahathir used, they just present Malaysia as threatening without evidence. So far, the only example you quote is Mahathir's "skinning the cat" but do you even know the meaning of that idiom? It simply means that there are multiple ways to deal with a situation that's all, how's that a threat? You said: "Don't just blindy believe your m'sia media or m'sian friends." You're the one saying (and I quote your words) "Everything that was reported in the news about m'sia are facts understand?" then now you're telling me not to believe what my Malaysian friends say? I get news from multiple sources, whereas you apparently just blindly believe Singapore media as facts that's all, then who's the one with blind allegiance here? I mean, you've accused me of lying yet you can't disprove my facts. It was Singapore that approached Malaysia for merger, Malaysia initially did not want merger and only reluctantly agreed, yet Lee Kuan Yew caused trouble for Malaysia by interfering in Malaysian policies. After separation, he even threatened to go to war with Malaysia if they stopped supplying water to Singapore (an accusation that has no statement to back it up). I mean, Malaysia is actually under no obligation to supply water to Singapore as separate countries, yet Singapore is the one pointing a gun at Malaysia here. Can't you see the absurdity of the geopolitical situation here? Yet you've accused me of lying when I substantiate my points with evidence? Malaysian workers and Mainland China workers worked in Singapore, yet some Singaporeans look down on foreign workers, even though we are only doing the work that many Singaporeans workers themselves refused to do. Yet you claim Singapore education system and media is not making out Malaysia to be the perceived enemy, then where is this dislike towards Malaysians and mainland Chinese coming from?
    3
  9480.  @Andy-P  The Canadian government had frozen the bank accounts of Canadian truckers participating in the "Freedom Convoy" demonstration in Ottawa. Also, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission announced it would start reimbursing account holders, with deposits of up to 50,000 yuan ($7,400) being the first to be returned.
    3
  9481. If U.S does succeed in transferring Taiwan's TSMC wafer fabrication technology to Arizona, does this mean that the island is of no further use to the U.S?
    3
  9482. Why the USA spend money to protect Japan? President Trump remarked that US-Japan defense pact is unfair, since U.S is obliged to protect Japan if Japan is attacked, but conversely Japan is not obliged to protect USA if US is attacked. Source: Trump questions Japan defense pact, says if US is attacked, ‘they can watch on a Sony television’ cnbc.com/2019/06/26/trump-questions-whether-postwar-defense-agreement-with-japan-is-fair.html
    3
  9483.  @gangzhou5407  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    3
  9484.  @maxpower4964  About Chinese leaving China, as the world's most populous country, there is also a possibility that there is not enough resources, not enough schools, and not jobs for every individual in China. With such a large student population, competition for top schools and higher education is extremely fierce and intense in China. Some students are unable to qualify for local university, so they may choose to study abroad (especially if their parents have $$$) Some graduates are also unable to find jobs in China so they may seek employment opportunities overseas. That's why your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, competing with your local students in tests and exams, for university spots and even job offers when they graduate. If they can't find a job in your country, they are always welcome to come home to China (thus saving China the resources needed to train this student to university level) and bringing foreign knowledge and technology to our shores. If they stay in your country and get a job, then they are depriving a local graduate of a job. If they rise to a high position in your corporate or government sector, then they might get approached by CPC and possibly recruited for industrial espionage or as a spy in your country. Which ever way you look at it, China wins.
    3
  9485.  @realamamiya7879  You are always welcome to disagree with me. Western universities do charge Chinese students hefty school fees, so they are bound to teach something useful to our students to justify the high price. But in the meantime, Chinese students are occupying university slots (instead of your locals) and competing with your local Western students in tests, exams, and even job offers when they graduate. In the USA, President Donald Trump's trade war with China has certainly made many Chinese people feel less comfortable about living and working in the US and it has also become more difficult to get a working visa for the US, thwarting many graduate students who get offers to work there but are forced to return home. This results in what's called a "reverse brain drain" where talented people are moving to a less developed country as compared to a developed country (as in a normal brain drain) Source: China's reverse brain drain straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/chinas-reverse-brain-drain-nation-columnist And if they managed to stay in Western country, they are depriving Western graduates of a job, and if they may get approached by CCP to be recruited as industrial espionage or a spy in Western country, if they rise to high positions in corporate or government sector. Whichever angle you look from, China wins.
    3
  9486.  @skevx0  Only a portion of Americans? The majority of Americans voted and elected their government into power, my logic is that shouldn't you extend the same feelings you have for the U.S government towards ordinary Americans as well? And even when you claimed that the Americans couldn't possibly know everything they their government did, information like the wars in the Middle East are out there and available for Americans to read, yet they still choose to elect their government, so how's it an excuse that Americans are uninformed?
    3
  9487.  @TurbulentEitri  The only way for those separatists to gain independence is to find some other plot of land to call their own. Isn't that already respecting their wishes?
    3
  9488.  @jtf873  You said: "I'm on a platform that is only allowing certain perspectives to be expressed because of the poisoning of our country by Chinese-like mentalities." And here I thought you were all about "freedoms" and "open expressions", yet a Chinese view is being equated to poisoning.
    3
  9489.  @Andy-P  Not only was Xi Jinping from a poor background, even his predecessor, Hu Jintao, came from a relatively impoverished background. Though Hu's father owned a small tea trading business in Taizhou, the family was relatively poor. His mother was a teacher and died when he was 7, and he was raised by an aunt.
    3
  9490. Cyrus' channel is dedicated to promoting the peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" between the US and China.
    3
  9491.  @palmpalm5131  Ah perhaps you're referring to bamboo pole jook-sing (竹升). It's a Cantonese term for an overseas Chinese person who was born in a Western environment or a Chinese person who more readily or strongly identifies with Western culture than traditional Chinese culture. The term jook-sing evolved from zuk-gong (竹杠; zhugang in Mandarin) which means a "bamboo pole" or "rod". Since gong (杠) is a Cantonese homophone of the inauspicious word 降 which means "descend" or "downward", it is replaced with sing (升), which means "ascend" or "upward".
    3
  9492.  @Time4Peace  Loss of income is regrettable yes, but money loss can be earned back in the future. But once elderly people lose their lives to the virus, no amount of money can buy back those lives that have been lost.
    3
  9493.  @markbenjamin1703  "神州 Shenzhou It exists as a collective defence organisation," NATO is not a defensive organization, they have been involved in wars such as the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia (bombing the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, killing 3 Chinese journalists and outraging the Chinese public) Cyrus mentioned this in 2:00 of the video. NATO also invaded and committed war atrocities in Libya and Afghanistan, so NATO is certainly not defensive in nature, when it's been expanding eastwards towards Russia.
    3
  9494.  @beastmode8203  I suggest you read the article: The Return of Industrial Warfare by Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), it suggests that the U.S military industrial capacity is woefully unprepared to take on Russia's military industrial capacity, let alone China's.
    3
  9495.  @hclau218  There are many definitions of democracy, and one of the most common is that of a government of the people, by the people, for the people. In the US case, it doesn't fit this definition of democracy because their leaders aren't able to deliver what the people want. Whereas in Russia and China, the governments are able to deliver economic growth for the people of Russia and China, so in a sense, they fit this definition of democracy better.
    3
  9496. Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous relationship with a much older man has been exposed and she has expressed a desire for personal privacy, but the WTA is demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see.
    3
  9497.  H Seong  I'm sure that if Bruce Lee were alive today, and if he witness the rise of China and the decline of the West, he would be still proud to call himself Chinese. He was already proud of his Chinese heritage while he was alive.
    3
  9498. 这种人算不如天算的人早死比较好。
    3
  9499.  @intothewrx  Could you please explain what's going on in Hong Kong then, since you claim that I don't know? The Hong Kong extradition bill was proposed because of a certain incident. A Hong Kong guy named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, and stuff her body in her suitcase, before flying back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice for his crime, but Hong Kong has no extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to Hong Kong extradition laws. Do the HK protestors even know what they are protesting for? Have they read the bill and understood its contents in their entirety?
    3
  9500.  @cq7499  那墙内有什么政治宣传呢？全都是美媒在墙外黑中国，中国政府已经很努力救人命，没有时间跟美国玩政治宣传呢。
    3
  9501. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my China is sending students to study in the West because with such a huge student population at home, the competition for top schools and higher education in China is fierce and intense. Some students are unable to qualify for local university in China, so they elect to study abroad in the West.
    3
  9502. 对此，外交部发言人汪文斌就回应称，坚决反对美国自己在俄乌战争上火上浇油，却把责任甩锅中国的做法。中国有权利，也有能力决定与哪个国家发展双边贸易。中国有权与包括俄罗斯在内的各国进行正常的商业往来，中方也会坚定地捍卫中国合法权益。
    3
  9503.  HellBlazerMNE07  You said: "Then again there are some 1000 times worse countries to live in too like Ch!na or North Korea." What makes you think life is 1000x worst in China? Chinese people have a higher life expectancy than that of the United States, do you really think life is that bad in China?
    3
  9504.  @zhaowei3025  China is literally expecting a bumper harvest this summer to enhance food self-sufficiency amid growing global food prices. About 80% of grain in southwest China has been harvested, while harvesting of the grain in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River has started, according to Chinese Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MOA).
    3
  9505.  @shambhutekar5797  Pakistan is China's ally, we call Pakistani our iron brother (铁巴) because our bond is as strong as iron. Together, Pakistan and China work towards mutual prosperity through the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), but it's usually those Indians that are attempting to drive a wedge between China and Pakistan.
    3
  9506. CanSino Biologics Inc said it received Chinese regulatory approval to start human trials of a vaccine against the novel coronavirus. Source: Chinese vaccine approved for human testing at virus epicentre straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/chinese-vaccine-approved-for-human-testing-at-virus-epicentre The vaccine, co-developed by the Hong Kong-listed company and China's Academy of Military Medical Sciences, will undergo clinical trials in Wuhan.
    3
  9507.  @marcoreviews  It's capitalism that's creates waste, because capitalists do whatever it takes to turn a profit, even at the cost to the environment. For example, in the olden days, if your shoe was in disrepair, you could take it to the cobblers to help repair your shoe, thus minimizing waste to the environment. However, capitalism has made the production of shoes so cheap, so much that most shoe owners would rather throw away a repairable shoe and buy a new shoe, at the expense to the environment. This is how capitalism shapes society into a throwaway society, and is destroying the planet in the process. In my example I used shoes, but you can replace shoes with almost any other example. If your earphones stop working, instead taking it to a repair shop, most people just throw it away and buy a new pair of earphones. Because capitalism makes it such that it's cheaper to just go and buy a new product (at expense to the environment) rather than try to fix a broken but repairable product.
    3
  9508.  @Tespri  "神州 Shenzhou Colonial mentality? Sorry but we don't live in 1800's anymore." Colonial mentality still exists within the minds of many people living in the former colonies. Although many former colonies have undergone the process of decolonization, many of their people's minds remained colonized, and they continue to worshipp Anglo-Saxon culture while harboring disdain for any "non-white" culture, including their own.
    3
  9509.  @MarkYeung1  Singapore practically lost its case for neutrality by slapping sanctions on Russia (the only ASEAN country to have done so) presumably on the U.S's orders. This has resulted in Russia blacklisting Singapore and putting it on a list of "unfriendly countries". Was such a political move by Singapore really worth it?
    3
  9510. China is helping build infrastructure in Kashmir to connect to Gwadar Port so that there will be more business in the area.
    3
  9511. Philippines had advanced Western weapons back in Korean war, and China's modern weaponry has advanced greatly since after Korean war. Right now, China is sending arms shipments to Philippines (including sniper rifles) to help Philippine authorities combat the rebel groups hiding in its islands.
    3
  9512. Chinese government been issuing multiple repeated requests for Indian troops to withdraw from our territory for months. It is obvious that India doesn't take our statements seriously, so in response we add more seriousness to our statements. The BRICS summit is coming soon, and Modi's possible absence of the summit will affect not just China, but the other BRICS countries as well. If Modi really boycotts BRICS summit over this issue, then India would be regarded as being selfish to other BRICS members, by hindering BRICS agenda in order to pursue India's own territorial dispute. How then does India expect other BRICS countries to side with India then?
    3
  9513.  @kus4kus4  I can apply the same logic to you, has anyone died from eating Pangolin, Raccoon, Bats, Dogs and Cats? And the bat soup coronavirus origins myth have long been debunked by experts. Source: No, Coronavirus Was Not Caused by 'Bat Soup'–But Here's What Researchers Think May Be to Blame health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/coronavirus-bat-soup
    3
  9514. “In the age of AI, where data is the new oil, China is the new Saudi Arabia!" - Lee Kai-fu, Venture Capitalist.
    3
  9515. @Al Castel Previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under the authoritarian rule of the colonial Britain, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong finally have democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, where they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    3
  9516. @Al Castel Where do you get this figure of 1 million Uighurs? Turns out this figure came from 2 dubious sources, one of which only interviewed 8 Uighurs on what their estimated number of Uighurs in re-education schools were, and then they extrapolated the figure to arrive at the figure of 1 million Uighurs in detention. Source: Claims that China has detained millions of Uyghur Muslims are based largely on two studies. A closer look at these papers reveals US government backing, absurdly shoddy methodologies, and a rapture-ready evangelical researcher named Adrian Zenz. thegrayzone.com/2019/12/21/china-detaining-millions-uyghurs-problems-claims-us-ngo-researcher/ While CHRD states that it interviewed dozens of ethnic Uyghurs in the course of its study, their enormous estimate was ultimately based on interviews with exactly eight Uyghur individuals.
    3
  9517.  @islandbee  Why is wearing modern clothing considering Western clothing? Do majority of Americans still wear their Revolutionary clothing even in this 21st century? Or the British or the French, etc? Whereas in the video you can see Chinese girl wearing traditional Chinese clothing Hanfu.
    3
  9518.  @islandbee  If we are talking about what Chinese people want, then why are you asking for a Chinese designer brand that is sought after world wide at all? It does not link to your argument. And like you said, only a small minority, the well to do Chinese, seek out Western brands, which implies that majority of Chinese seek out local Chinese brands. Therefore you have actually answered your own question here.
    3
  9519.  @islandbee  China has produced many successful Chinese companies like Huawei, Lenovo, ZTE, Xiaomi, Oppo, Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, DJI, Haier, Bank of China, AgBank, ICBC, China Construction Bank, State Grid, CSCEC, Sinopec, China National Petroleum, China Minmetals, Ping An Insurance, Shenhua Energy, Midea Group, Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, and this list is not exhaustive, and many of them have made it onto magazine lists of top companies in the World. Sources: List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks Fortune Global 500 wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_Global_500 Forbes Global 2000 wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Global_2000 Therefore, why do you claim Chinese brands don't have quality?
    3
  9520.  @islandbee  said "And some of the restaurants in China are just a weak attempt at copying a Western brand." Firstly, Chinese food is delicious and many people all over the world have professed their love of authentic Chinese cuisine, setting up restaurants to adapt Chinese flavors to their local tastes. If you want something flavorful, try our Sweet & Sour Pork. If you want something meaty, we have Peking Duck. If you are in a rush, just grab a convenient Baozi (Pork Bun) and eat it on the go. If you want something light, we have Dimsum Dumplings. If you like mild spicy, care to try our Kung Pao Chicken? If you like very spicy, dare to try our Mapo Tofu? If you are vegetarian, we have vegetarian Springrolls. And we are Tofu heaven. If you like rice, we have Fried Rice. If you like noodles, we have Chow Mein. If you like porridge, we have Congee. If you like soups, try our Hotpot. If you like seafood, well, you're in luck because Chinese people love seafood too! Food is life and Chinese celebrate our food culture. With such a wide variety of food, people are bound to find something that they like in Chinese cuisine. Secondly, even Americans have their own American Chinese food, like General Tso's Chicken, Chop Suey, Beef & Broccoli, and many more. Even the Japanese have food with Chinese origins like Ramen (lāmiàn 拉面), Gyoza, Mabodofu (mápódòufu 麻婆豆腐), Chashu (叉烧), Harumaki, and so on. Even the Koreans have food with Chinese origins like Jajangmyeon (zhájiàngmiàn 炸酱面), Jjamppong, Tangsuyuk (tángcùròu 糖醋肉) Sources: American Chinese cuisine wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Chinese_cuisine Japanese Chinese cuisine wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Chinese_cuisine Korean Chinese cuisine wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Chinese_cuisine Therefore Western food in Chinese restaurants are primarily meant to appeal to Chinese tastes, just like how Chinese food in other countries are cooked to suite their local palate.
    3
  9521.  @Andy-P  There's an RT video here on YouTube, showing the lives of ethnic Russians living under constant shelling for 8 years in the two regions. It's entitled Donbass: The Grey Zone. Life in the frontline villages | RT Documentary (watch?v=c7P6j6og4k)
    3
  9522.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou You can take the Putin side and justify the invasion and takeover of a country." So does that mean that you take the Ukrainian side, despite the neo-Nazis that's been killing some 14,000 ethnic Russians living in Donetsk and Luhansk over the course of 8 years? And as of right now, Ukraine hasn't been taken over yet, so your claims of takeover of a country is at the moment, merely your own speculation that's all. Nobody knows what Putin will do afterwards with government of Ukraine, in fact that's probably the hard part, since the question is whether Putin will forcefully occupy Ukraine or withdraw his forces once it's over. You said: "The world see's CCP not condemning this." Well, neither is India (the world's largest democracy) not condemning this it seems. But instead of seeing this, the world seems blind to India abstaining from the UN vote. You said: "They see CCP will be fine with invasions justified by propaganda." Anything you apply towards the CPC with regards to this Ukrainian conflict can also be applied to India, a democratic country that choose to abstain from voting.
    3
  9523.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou What do you expect from RT?" I can expect hearing opinions about world events from the other side. Why'd you think the European Union is trying to effectively ban RT and Sputnik News from it's domestic audiences? Sun Zi from The Art of War said to know yourself and know your enemy, but when EU is censoring the other side's views, then how will you achieve balance in acquiring your own view?
    3
  9524. Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why American monopolies like Apple, Facebook (Meta), Google and Amazon dominate their respective field, having eliminated/bought out the competition from smaller American firms long ago. Whereas China is cracking down on anti-competitive practices in Alibaba, DiDi, Ant Financial, etc. and allowing smaller firms to emerge and compete.
    3
  9525. First they went after Huawei. Now they are going after TikTok. It's only of matter of time before BYD becomes the next victim.
    3
  9526.  @lyhthegreat  The doctor's post was on the 30th Dec 2019. The next day, China had reported it to the WHO on 31st Dec 2019, so how is China covering up?
    3
  9527.  @lyhthegreat  But you specifically said it was the doctor (whose post is just 1 day in advance) then how is China covering up? You still haven't explained it.
    3
  9528.  Arabic Reja  What genocide regime? Isn't China currently the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people?
    3
  9529.  @MarkYeung1  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    3
  9530.  @MarkYeung1  Taiwan actually flourished and prospered under the authoritarian single-party KMT rule. Since democracy was introduced, Taiwan's economy stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising, and Taiwan graduates are seeking employment opportunities overseas.
    3
  9531.  @jp95js  But by doing so, you produce more food waste than your pets can even consume. Industrial fish processing is wasteful and apparently, the scraps can contain up to 70 percent of the fish! But if the fish head is eaten, fewer scraps will be tossed out. If you toss out the meatier part of the fish, you are not getting the value for your money. On a greater scale, eating fish head benefits the environment. It eliminates the need for extra processing, so there will be less pollution from factories.
    3
  9532.  @jp95js  The name of the party in Chinese is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where Zhōngguó (中国) means China and Gòngchǎndǎng (共产党) means Communist Party. So the correct name is the Communist Party of China (CPC) not the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
    3
  9533.  @jp95js  The batsoup coronavirus origins have been debunked as having been filmed in Panau (an island close to Indonesia) not from Wuhan, what are you talking about?
    3
  9534.  @jp95js  For example, let's use other communist parties for comparison with the Communist Party of China (CPC). -In Vietnam, they have the Communist Party of Vietnam. -In Cuba, they have the Communist Party of Cuba. -In North Korea, it's the Worker's Party of Korea. (different name, but the format is the same). -In Venezuela, they have the Communist Party of Venezuela. -In the former Soviet Union, they had the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. -In West Germany, they had the Communist Party of Germany. ... Yet why is it when it comes to China, suddenly you claim it's the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) instead of the Communist Party of China (CPC)?
    3
  9535.  @richarde.halliburton8022  What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    3
  9536.  @jp95js  -In Vietnam, they have the Communist Party of Vietnam. -In Cuba, they have the Communist Party of Cuba. -In North Korea, it's the Worker's Party of Korea. (different name, but the format is the same). -In Venezuela, they have the Communist Party of Venezuela. -In the former Soviet Union, they had the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. -In West Germany, they had the Communist Party of Germany. Even in Western countries: -In Australia, they have the Communist Party of Australia. -In Canada, they have the Communist Party of Canada. -In Britain, they have the Communist Party of Britain. -In the USA, they have Communist Party USA. ... Yet why is it when it comes to China, suddenly you claim it's the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) instead of the Communist Party of China (CPC)?
    3
  9537.  @richarde.halliburton8022  Is that so? Saudi Arabia is constitutional monarchy and they have poor human rights records, yet you don't see the United States going after Saudi Arabia with the same level as they do China. I mean, if China's political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then what's wrong with allowing China to continue our political system? Not all countries have to adopt Western brand of democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    3
  9538.  @richarde.halliburton8022  神州 Shenzhou "It depends on how you define "successful."" Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past as the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) but today the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 , China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China), having world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and world's largest navy, PLA Navy, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    3
  9539. Taken from an article: The Diplomat: The Shanghai Communique: An American Foreign Policy Success, 45 Years Later On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia...The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position.
    3
  9540. Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    3
  9541. Tom Harvy If China is aggressive evil government, then why is China currently peaceful and not at war with other countries, since our last major war in 1979, 30 years ago? What about USA getting involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, even in 21st centuries?
    3
  9542. @Huai Danny Framing nation states as crazy women? Many nation states are literally regarded as feminine. Most countries are referred to as she or her or in any female form because the concept of motherhood is attached to the country. Yet when I use ex-wife to refer to Ukraine, its being labelled as sexist by you? And you claim that you're not part of the SJW crowd, yet here you are literally following the West in playing the sexist card against this analogy. Some people in the West are capitalising on this analogy to promote their gender politics to take away from the analogy itself, and you're basically following in their footsteps. The brotherhood analogy won't work as well, because how to describe Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk as children in such an analogy? I don't understand why the analogy has to be modified because of political correctness nature of the West.
    3
  9543.  @ladodah  Corruption is a universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-corruption campaigns to crackdown on the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But when is the last time a country like USA for example, had an anti-corruption of its own? Hillary Clinton is a corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign, but after he became president, no further action has been taken against Clinton for corruption. About the Social Credit System, many foreigners often complain about the bad behavioura of some Chinese people such as spitting in public, smoking in non-smoking areas, jumping queues, disobeying traffic rules, jay walking, driving on the wrong side of the road, speeding through red lights, etc when not all Chinese people are like that. We Chinese feel embarrassed that such bad people represent China overseas, so the government is planning a social credit system to discourage such bad behaviour and promote better behaviour instead. If implemented, this will be a meritocratic system where good behaviour is rewarded and bad behaviour penalised. But if such people persist with bad behaviour, until their scores fall to become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisances of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again.
    3
  9544.  @ladodah  Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of bad weather. In 1958, the Yellow River flooded, which coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. In July 1958, the peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 m3/s (790,000 cu ft/s) with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kg/m3 (57 lb/cu ft), 14× and 24× their mean annual values, respectively. The flood water level was so high that it rose up to the top of the levee in several places. This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. It was reported as the most severe flood since 1933. As for the falsified data, that was not by Mao, it was local provincial governments that deliberately exaggerated the crop yields to the central government. Mao even personally visited the fields himself, but the provincial government would get farmers to transplant healthy stalks from dying fields to healthy fields, giving off the illusion of a bumper harvest to Mao when he inspected the fields. Therefore Mao concluded that since there was a surplus of grain, instead of letting the surplus rot, China could afford to export the surplus grain to Russia to pay them back for imports of Russian agricultural machinery. Therefore, Mao was actually duped by the provincial government who exaggerated their crop yields, so Mao decided to export the surplus grain. How is Mao the cause of the famine then?
    3
  9545.  @ladodah  What makes you seem to think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending coin on your tourism industry. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same courses as their Western peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, etc are expanding overseas, and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. So what makes you seem to think Chinese aren't free? Chinese can be found all over the world, we practically make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    3
  9546. In the Koran (Islam Holy Book) there are many inappropriate teachings like polygamy, pedophilia, slavery, intolerance of people with other beliefs, unhealthy traditions like fasting during Ramadan, praying 5 times daily, and so on, so what Chinese government is doing is to remove this extremist elements that's all.
    3
  9547.  @takethatwumao1999  It's your own country's athletes loss if you boycott the Olympics. More gold medals for China then.
    3
  9548.  @floydsemlow8253  "as American I can tell you I'm as free as a 🕊 I couldn't say that if I lived in China or Russia. 🤷" People in China and Russia can also say that we are as free as a dove, what makes you think we can't do that in China or Russia?
    3
  9549. Criminal? He's literally the founding father of the People's Republic of China. He succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where even the previous Republic of China (1912-1949) under Kuomintang administration failed to achieve for 37 years. If not for Mao, China today would most likely still be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the unified country we are today.
    3
  9550.  @josesilva4171  "no. It is their land." But Ukraine's gradually losing more and more territory the longer this drags on. If you were really putting Ukraine's interests ahead of everything else, then isn't it better if Zelenskyy sues for peace? Isn't Ukrainian lives more important than land?
    3
  9551.  @josesilva4171  "I would do it for my country." So you're saying that those Ukrainians that fled Ukraine should all be rounded up and sent back to Ukraine?
    3
  9552. ​ @MarkNOTW  Agree with you. This JoseSilva guy is certainly not pro-Ukraine when he's advocating for Ukrainians to fight till there are no more, instead of exploring options for a peaceful resolution. He doesn't have Ukraine's interests in mind.
    3
  9553.  @josesilva4171  "I am not Russophobic. Russians are great people" Then why do you not permit Russians to remain on Ukrainian soil? It's apparent that you've got something against the Russian people themselves. Also, did you know that Russians had been living on Ukrainian soil since the Soviet Union times? Even before 2022, there were ethnic Russians living in Ukraine.
    3
  9554.  happy gekko  THAAD does not defend South Korea from North Korea. Its protection doesn't even encompass Seoul at all, so how is THAAD being installed for defense against the North? The North is literally right beside the South, and THAAD is designed for long-range missile detection.
    3
  9555. China also once believed we will never get invaded, but 19th century British wanted continue drinking our tea, which China did not want to sell, so they waged two bloody wars with China and force us to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Ports like Shanghai were forced open to distribute the drug throughout China and Hong Kong was also stolen from us. Next during Boxer Rebellion, Chinese people wanted foreigners out of our lands, but 8 nations (USA, Russia, UK, Italy, France... ... even Japan) made an alliance to invade China and kill our people on our own soil. There was even widespread looting and raping of Chinese women. Afterwards, China's territory carved up like pie for the Western powers and China forced make massive payments to them. Japan wasn't satisfied, made 21 demands and also invaded Manchuria, kicking off Sino-Japanese war, years before Nazi even invade Poland. Japan committed vast atrocities like Rape of Nanjing, Unit 731 and "comfort" women. In the past, Japan was starving and tribal country, but China taught Japan how to grow rice to feed themselves, how to cultivate silk for pretty kimono, and even how to read and write Chinese characters. Japan repaid this kindness by invading our lands, stealing our territory, killing our men and raping our women, even when Chinese army had never set foot on Japanese soil. Nobody cares about China except Chinese people. Nobody can defend China from invaders, except Chinese people. Today, PLA is world's largest land army and because of that, Britain, Japan and USA think twice before invading China like they did in the past. A big country with weak army is ripe target for invasion, but a strong army acts as deterrent to invasion.
    3
  9556.  @MarkYeung1  The Communist Party of China has actually acknowledged that Chairman Mao did more good for China than bad. Even in 1981, Deng Xiaoping acknowledged that Mao's contributions to the Chinese revolution far outweigh his mistakes, that his merits are primary and his errors secondary. According to Deng Xiaoping, Mao Zedong rendered indelible meritorious service in founding and building up the communist party and the Chinese liberation of the oppressed nations of the world and to the progress of mankind.
    3
  9557.  @Yellow1964  Yes, I thought I could have a productive discussion with mansana, but it appears he was too focused on attacking me personally with insults, just because I happen to hold a different view from him.
    3
  9558.  @Yellow1964  I studied engineering in USA. It used to be the dream of many Chinese here to study abroad, and the USA was the top choice as a destination to study abroad. The United States is incredibly racially diverse with so many different races like _Anglo-Saxon American (White), African American (Black), Latino American (Brown), Asian Americans (Yellow) and Native American (red) each with their own color code. But sadly, I agree with you that recently the racial divide is widening, until Americans become suspicious towards their own people. Its tragic that the one issue enjoying bipartisan support and keeps Americans unified, is their continued perception of China as "the enemy". From Kishore Mabubani, it appears that the United States is the only developed country where the bottom 50% of income groups remained unchanged in their quality of life, and they are about as poor as they were some 40 years ago. Meanwhile the rich have gotten richer and the inequity gap is widening especially over the course of the pandemic, yet the POTUS seems more interested in containing China's rise rather than focusing on domestic issues. I hope more Americans figure out that the US government is using external issues to distract and direct attention away from important internal issues in America.
    3
  9559.  @quekjoseph836  China has our own court laws, just like Canada has theirs, so why are you blaming Chinese court laws as being different from Canada? You don't even care about the two Canadians in the first place, but Meng Wanzhou is Huawei CFO and her house arrest obstructs her from performing her full duties as Huawei's CFO. USA does this in order to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride that's all.
    3
  9560.  @quekjoseph836  The South China Sea is closest to China and Russia and farthest from the United States, yet the USA send their warships and aircraft carrier strike groups halfway across the globe to South China Sea then why can't China and Russia navy conduct exercise in the South China Sea too? Those waters are literally in China's doorstep then why can't China and Russia conduct navy exercises to the promote peace at our doorstep? Chinese government has urged Russia not to sell arms to India. Source: Chinese government mouthpiece People’s Daily urges Russia not to sell arms to India indiatoday.in/world/story/chinese-government-mouthpiece-people-s-daily-urges-russia-not-to-sell-arms-to-india-1691982-2020-06-23
    3
  9561.  Gaylord Manlove  "神州 Shenzhou You have NOT answered the question. Why did Meng have multiple passports from HK and China ?" Because the PRC passport is not as powerful as the HK passport. PRC passport is less accepted globally than HK passport and you'll need to apply for VISA in more countries if you want to travel with PRC passport alone, than with HK passport. That's why Meng has HK passport for better travel convenience. Also, when did you ask such a question?
    3
  9562.  @D1it4FN  "神州 Shenzhou Canada didn't started this mess. Canada was duty-bound to honour an agreement with the United States." Therefore, you have just admitted that Canada started this mess when they choose to follow the US's bidding. How does that reasoning excuse Canada not starting this mess? You think there are no consequences to "carrying out duties"?
    3
  9563.  @songsabai3794  Why resort to hurling personal insults against me (like calling me simple-minded) instead of attempting to refute my points?
    3
  9564.  @yslee1401  Lol, why don't you ask Canada to release Meng Wanzhou so she can walk 50m outside her home? Heck, let her walk to the airport and fly back to China while you're at it.
    3
  9565.  @hmong_keeb_kwm  You want to talk about "completely rape everyone to destruction" then you should be bringing up the Mongols during the Yuan Dynasty. Who grows the food necessary to feed the empire? The Mongols were nomadic tribesmen who lived off the land and moved to greener pastures during the lean times, so it was Han farmers who grew the food necessary to feed the empire. Who plans the towns and builds permanent buildings? The Mongols lived in temporary housing (called yurts) so it was Han architects and builders that created the famous Chinese architecture. Who ensures that the empire is kept running smoothly? The Mongols knew nothing of bureaucracy, so it was Han bureaucrats that ensured the day to day affairs of the empire were kept running smoothly. The Mongols only know how to fight, to pillage resources from others, to destroy libraries, to conquer regions and rape women that's all.
    3
  9566.  @alishanightshade3270  "神州 Shenzhou Wow, turning CCP's weird behaviors to normal. Everything is normal to you until something happened and affected your daily life." You are clearly overthinking things. Peng Shuai's previous relationship with a much older man has been exposed and it's already very shameful, so she's trying to lay low for a while and avoid the public eye, so what's abnormal about this? But Western MSM are demanding that she appear in public to explain her private affairs for the world to see.
    3
  9567.  @Abc15342  I suggest listening to talks by Martin Jacques, Kishore Mabubani, Eric Li, Prof Zhang Weiwei, for more information about China.
    3
  9568.  @jayztv3345  Republic of China published the Eleven Dash Line in 1947. Back then, even the Philippines did not protest China's claim to the South China Sea. Even the Americans reminded the Philippines that the Spratly Islands wasn't Philippines territory as per the 1898 Treaty of Paris.
    3
  9569.  @wlakongpake  So the Sierra Madre is also part of your imagination? Then why Philippines keep sending supply ships to reinforce the decaying hull of this grounded vessel?
    3
  9570.  @edzdeguzman612  So Philippines listen to King of Spain in 1734? Then why not Philippines follow the maritime boundary marked out in the 1898 Treaty of Paris? The Treaty of Paris does not include South China Sea islands as within Philippine territory. (Source: Wikipedia: File: Ph boundary in Treaty of Paris 1898)
    3
  9571.  @TacticalMayo  Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and its "allies.)
    3
  9572.  @yuanfangli9272  You said: "the CCP must be driven out of China" Why do you want Chinese people to overthrow our government? The CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want Chinese people to overthrow our government? Just because you claim CPC is hostile? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Which country is the real threat to global peace and stability here? Which country is hostile to the world, you tell me?
    3
  9573.  @yuanfangli9272  You said: "China has thousands of years of great historical civilization and never needs CCP" China has 5, 000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. So why are you bringing up Chinese history when China has been under authoritarian rule for thousands of years? If anything, this history highlights that authoritarian system best suits China.
    3
  9574.  @yuanfangli9272  You said: "There is no CCP in China’s thousands of years of history" But throughout China's 5,000 years of history, China's political system has always relied on a strong central government, under the Emperor and the Imperial Court, and that's what the Communist Party of China represents; strong central leadership. Why should Chinese people get rid of the CPC when it has proven to be a viable system (and extremely successful to boot) of governance for China? Millions of people in China have been lifted out of poverty into the middle class, and the livelihoods and living standards of many people have vastly improved under the leadership of the CPC, so why should we get rid of the CPC and destroy a system that clearly works for China?
    3
  9575.  @hectoOut  "神州 Shenzhou did you hire any locals or you bring Chinese workers along in those infrastructure project?" Building infrastructure is not that simple, you'll need qualified workers and engineers to build roads, railways, highways, bridges, etc. Many developing countries simply lack the qualified workers and engineers, whereas China has arguably the best expertise when it comes to building infrastructure, so that's why Chinese workers and engineers are hired first. Meanwhile, developing countries themselves are training more engineers and workers so that they can take over infrastructure jobs in the future. You said: "Instead of building ghost cities in China now yiu find new way to get your money back." So-called Chinese "ghost cities" are gradually filling up as more people migrate from the rural countryside to the urban centers. For example, Zhengzhou was once called China's Largest "Ghost City" according to the London Daily. But today, Zhengzhou has a population of 12,600,574 inhabitants and a total GDP of 1.014 trillion (RMB) in 2018. You said: "get rid off country of Taiwan and perhaps Australia and NZ next." Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, even Taiwan's own constitution says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Additionally, if mainland China can offer a better deal to those countries compared to Taiwan island, then can't those Pacific nations accept the mainland's deal? You said: "Where is in tye Chinese history book says Chinese call other races as their brothers sisters?" Take Pakistan for example, Chinese refer to Pakistani people as our "iron brother" (巴铁) because our friendship is as strong as iron.
    3
  9576. The population of Uighurs in China actually nearly quadrupled in size from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want.
    3
  9577.  @performancefluid3666  China is changing rapidly, while your home country is changing at a slower pace. To each his own, but I believe for many young folk, they want to be at the cutting edge of technological advancement, whereas the older folk usually prefer a more sedimentary form of lifestyle. But ultimately change is inevitable, and the ripples of China's technological advancements will eventually reach even your part of the globe.
    3
  9578.  @MarkYeung1  "Just like Russia, opposition parties have been suppressed." Actually it's Zelenskyy that has been suppressing the opposition in Ukraine. He has suspended 11 opposition parties in Ukraine and Zelenskyy will not be holding any elections in 2024 this year. Whereas the opposition party exists in Russia and Putin has previously announced his candidacy in the upcoming 2024 Presidential Election in Russia.
    3
  9579. ​ @MarkYeung1  So if you support Zelenskyy banning 11 opposition parties that are pro-Russia, then can't Russia also ban opposition parties that are pro-West? Same goes for North Korea, can't Kim Jung Un also ban opposition parties that are pro-West? And what's the point of Ukraine having "more than a dozen other parties" to choose, when Zelenskyy will not be holding any elections in 2024? Whereas Putin is going to run for reelection in 2024 and giving the people of Russia a chance to vote. You said: "Which country is invading Russia now? ... Which country is invading North Korea now?" Russia's border town was recently the target of Ukrainian missiles. Also, since the Korean War did not end with a peace treaty, then technically, North Korea is still at war with the USA. You said: "What choice does the mainland Chinese do in terms of ruling party, even in the time of peace." Apart from the CPC, China has 8 other political parties and they are the Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang, China Democratic League, China National Democratic Construction Association, China Association for Promoting Democracy, Chinese Peasants' and Workers' Democratic Party, China Zhi Gong Party, Jiusan Society and the Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League
    3
  9580.  @Nechole777  "Where's the proof that she's alive?" We have footage and photos of Peng Shuai attending diners and award ceremonies for youth athletes (even seen together with Yao Ming) yet you still want proof that Peng Shuai is alive?
    3
  9581.  @gbenay  "That lady was sexually assaulted. He drugged her, then raped her." That's a serious accusation, but where's the evidence that Peng Shuai was drugged and sexually assaulted? I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and she previously had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several years in fact. But where are the allegations of sexual assault in Peng Shuai's post? Could you point out where in her post did she ever said that she was drugged and raped? On 17th November, Peng Shuai wrote an email to WTA saying that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    3
  9582.  @Nechole777  "Where is the proof that she’s alive?" Here's an interview with Peng Shuai by a reporter from Singaporean newspaper Lianhe Zaobao and she denies the accusation of sexual assault in her post. Video:youtu.be/ZF9Owb9uSOE
    3
  9583. @Provo Beats If Taiwan is an independent country, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations? Is there some force preventing Taiwan from joining the UN like an independent country can?
    3
  9584.  @trumplostlol3007  Washington recognizes Beijing and does not recognize Taipei, that's why there are U.S embassy in China and no U.S embassy in Taiwan island. Since the 1972 Shanghai Communique, the U.S acknowledge that there is only one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the U.S does not challenge that position. "On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique...The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position." ... Source: The Diplomat: Shanghai Communique
    3
  9585.  @Alblaka  You said: "I cannot set foot in China, because... they have legal ground to arrest me, because I posted a negative view of China on the internet once." That's nonsense. I mean, which foreigner in China has been arrested just for posting a negative view of China in the Internet once? Your paranoia is precisely what they want to deter you from visiting China and finding out the truth.
    3
  9586.  @ernestosamuelsen6984  What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    3
  9587.  @elogan6563  "Communist" mainland China today is currently the world's 2nd largest economy and still growing, whereas democratic Hong Kong's economy is ranked 34th in the world and is currently in a slump today. What happened to Hong Kong's previous prosperity as a British colony?
    3
  9588.  @elogan6563  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china
    3
  9589.  @elogan6563  Previously, Hong Kong was once a thriving port city as British colony, while the mainland was still poor at that time. Today however, fortunes have reversed and Hong Kong has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan, etc and is facing increasing levels of competition from other upcoming mainland cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian, etc. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports Source: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage. And that's despite mainland port cities being under communist party rule, while Hong Kong is suffering under its own democratic government. No wonder why the people of Hong Kong feel as though they are being left behind as mainland cities start surpassing Hong Kong.
    3
  9590.  @ernestosamuelsen6984  About Social Credit System, many foreigners often claim Chinese people spit in public, smoke in non-smoking areas, jump queues, disobey traffic rules, jay walk, drive on wrong side of the road, speed through red lights, etc when not all Chinese people are like that. We Chinese feel embarrassed that such bad people represent China overseas. So the government introduce social credit system to discourage such bad behaviour and promote better behaviour instead. This is meritocratic system where good behaviour is rewarded and bad behaviour is penalised. But if they persist with bad behaviour, until their scores fall to become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisances of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again.
    3
  9591.  @ernestosamuelsen6984  About imprisonment, the United States has the world's largest prison incarceration rate in the world, and its prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate So judging by the statistics, its actually is America that is the prison state. More people get arrested in America than in China, yet you boast of freedom and liberty?
    3
  9592.  @ernestosamuelsen6984  Evil? Chinese workers are helping build infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc, in African countries. China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, as compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. And I have refuted your previous point about Social Credit System. And Mao Zedong killing 50 million to get control of the population? China was undergoing Chinese Civil War at that time, so of course Chinese were killing Chinese. Just like in American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans. Or Vietnamese killing Vietnamese in Vietnam War. Or Koreans in Korean War or any civil war for that matter. And isn't China the country with the world's largest population today? So what's your point?
    3
  9593.  @ernestosamuelsen6984  Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China youtu.be/TtduKDpy4oc
    3
  9594.  @elogan6563  China has produced many successful Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, ZTE, LENOVO, DJI, Haier, Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, NetEase, Meituan-Dianping, Bank of China, ICBC, AgBank, China Construction Bank, Ping An Insurance, Sinopec Group, China National Petroleum, China Minmetals, China State Construction, and the list goes on. Many of these companies have successfully made it onto business magazines like Forbes Global 2000 and Fortune Global 500 Sources: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies Forbes Global 2000 wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Global_2000 Fortune Global 500 wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_Global_500 But where are all the famous companies from Hong Kong you tell me? How can Hong Kong possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic might of the mainland?
    3
  9595.  @oliverbanes5121  In Australia, your Australian government only lockdown cities for a meager 5-7 days, how's that going to stop the Covid-19 from spreading? The coronavirus has a fixed attention span of 5-7 days, is that it? Why not lock down for months to ensure that the coronavirus is contained before re-opening?
    3
  9596.  @Andy-P  You said: "Taiwan isn't Chinese territory. Civil war is still war where people die." But you've just admitted that it's a internal Civil War that means you consider Taiwan a part of Chinese territory, isn't it? Your words indicate that any potential war would be seen as a continuation of the Chinese Civil War, not an invasion of another country, which means you consider Taiwan part of China.
    3
  9597.  @stopwarstop7334  So why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and fled to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Defeating the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT, yet despite all their initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while at the same time cementing the communists right to rule China.
    3
  9598.  @Andy-P  But the American Civil War (the one in 1861) was between the North (the Union) and the South (the Confederates) and that's the situation between mainland and Taiwan, except unlike the American Civil War, full reunification of China is yet to occur. And as of the situation right now, USA and it's allies are more preoccupied with Russian soldiers amassing at Russia's border with Ukraine. South Korea and Japan are unlikely to join Taiwan against the mainland, when they have North Korea to deal with, so it appears that Taiwan is the least of the U.S allies concerns seemingly at the moment.
    3
  9599. There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, merely detected in China. An Italian doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    3
  9600.  Wally Wally  China has pollution problems yes, but China is taking steps to address the situation by switching to renewable energy. For example, China built Three Gorges Dam (world's largest hydroelectric powerstation) to control flooding in Yangtze river as well as produce renewable energy to fuel our growth and reduce our reliance on fossil fuels. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtube.com/watch?v=b8cCsUBYSkw Whereas President Trump is promising to bring coal power back to USA and he even withdrew USA from 2017 Paris Climate Accord, thus not restricting US CO2 production limits.
    3
  9601.  @xueueux  Me too. Jeff Sach had used the example of The Prisoner's Dilemma to illustrate the benefits to both U.S and China if both sides agree to deescalation, as well as the drawbacks if either U.S or China (or both) decide to escalate.
    3
  9602.  @billyehh  You said: "Add to that, the social unrest from 40 million men who can't find a mate." There are always solutions to the shortage of women. One possible solution is buying Vietnamese or Cambodian wives. Lonely rural men in China are purchasing brides from places like Vietnam or Cambodia and this could possibly help to alleviate the unequal gender ratio.
    3
  9603. China has 5000 years of history, and of course, the names of China have changed over such long history. Only after the fall of the Qing government, did 漢 became the name of a nationality within China. Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_China#Han
    3
  9604. The communist party has made mistakes in the past but they have long since acknowledged that Mao's policies weren't beneficial, and switched from Marxist policies to capitalism. It is the same governing party that brought success to China by making us world's 2nd largest economy and raising half a billion people out of poverty. Most Chinese people have put aside the past and as long as the government able to support economic growth, many Chinese are satisfied with current governing system.
    3
  9605.  @ericcartmann  If in the people's personal affairs, they remain poor, jobless, and harboring terrorist tendencies, then why can't the government act now and help prevent the Uighur from bending towards terrorism? You've seen the interview by the staff, and all they do is remove the extremist elements from the Uighurs that's all, and provide free education and job skills training to prepare the Uighurs for the workforce.
    3
  9606.  @TheGamingAlong  China is not making the Uighurs leave their faith. Like the video explained, the staff is only getting rid of the extremist elements that's all.
    3
  9607.  @vanessalassissi9230  "神州 Shenzhou so Islam means systematic radicalism??" Where did I ever said such a thing? Quote my words claiming that "Islam means systematic radicalism", because, I clearly never said such a thing.
    3
  9608.  @ericcartmann  You work with good Muslims yes, but what about those who have been radicalized? It is estimated that around 4,000 people have left their homes in the West to migrate to ISIS, because your governments are letting Muslims do whatever they want in your lands, instead of removing the extremist elements like what Chinese government is doing. Source: _Why Are Westerners Attracted to ISIS?_.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/07/isis-foreign-fighters-political-pilgrims/399209/
    3
  9609.  @TheGamingAlong  In America, there is growing anti-Muslim sentiment among some Americans, because the Muslims aren't assimilating into American culture. They are allowing Muslims to build more mosques (like in this video in Spotsylvania, Virginia) and secretly, Americans are angry but many fear to voice their honest opinion because of "political correctness" culture. Video: youtube.com/watch?v=INy4gaUrCL4 I mean, why are Westerners bending over backwards to accommodate Muslims? If your country don't control religion, then slowly, religion will start to control your country.
    3
  9610. @Danish Khan I was talking about Westerners joining ISIS. Even without your rumours of organ harvesting, people in Western countries (an estimated 4,000) are flocking to join ISIS, and what are Western governments doing about it? Nothing. At least in China, the government is monitoring possible terrorist activity in Xinjiang and making it difficult for Uighurs to join the terrorist's cause.
    3
  9611.  @thenutbrothers8726  The 1735 d’Anville map was made by French cartographer Jean-Baptiste Bourguignon d’Anville (1697–1782), so this foreigner literally got the Map of Qing China wrong, yet you are somehow taking his map as proof? There are so many map of Qing Dynasty China during that period and Xinjiang, Tibet, Mongolia and Manchuria were clearly part of Qing Dynasty China. Here is Map of Qing Dynasty since 1820 AD Source: Empire of the Great Qing https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ca/Qing_Dynasty_1820.png
    3
  9612.  @thenutbrothers8726  The children of Uighur parents are being taught Mandarin Chinese and to love China, because they are citizens of China after all. I mean, don't American children learn English in school and are taught the American national anthem? Even the Native Americans? So why can't China do the same? Barbed wire is necessary, because these are just kids after all, and what happens if kidnapper from outside attempt to infiltrate this kindergartens and harm the children here? Access is controlled in order to protect the kids from unknown visitors who may attempt to influence these kids (especially those Islamic radicalist)
    3
  9613.  @saimalishahid1406  How long did Saudi Arabia banned women from driving? And if your country enforce Islamic values (because Saudi Arabian government is Islamic) then why can't Chinese government enforce atheist laws (because Chinese government is atheist) I mean, its your country, your laws, then likewise, its our country, our laws. What about Saudi Arabian Crown Prince murdering a reporter then? Didn't President Trump support Saudi Arabian Prince and declared the reporter "enemy of the state" Source: Trump 'stands with' Saudi Arabia and defends crown prince over Khashoggi theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/20/trump-saudi-arabia-jamal-khashoggi-crown-prince
    3
  9614.  @ashishkalam9337  "神州 Shenzhou are you saying Uighurs Don't work hard?" Source: Just one in five Muslims are in work as report finds they are held back by racism thesun.co.uk/news/4411913/just-one-in-five-muslims-are-in-work-as-report-finds-they-are-held-back-by-racism/
    3
  9615.  @saimalishahid1406  said "you're blatantly defending something so obviously horrible. Treating people like s**t is wrong " China is providing free education to these Uighurs and providing job training to increase their work opportunities when they graduate. Uighurs are free to paint, sing and dance, play instruments, play sports like basketball for recreation, so who's being treated like s**t here?
    3
  9616.  @diiriyetv  said "神州 Shenzhou you cannot compare the civilised west to China where there is zero culture," China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. Chinese today celebrate Chinese festivals that are thousands of years old, such as Spring Festival (Chinese New Year), Lantern Festival, Qingming (grave-sweeping) Festival, Dragon Boat Festival, Double Seventh (Chinese Valentime's Day) Festival, Mid-Autumn Festival, and many more The Chinese New Year migration in China (where we make the journey back to our home province to be with our loved ones) has been termed world's largest annual human migration, surpassing even the Western Christmas migration in terms of sheer volume of traffic. Source: Forbes: Chinese New Year: The World's Largest Human Migration Is About To Begin forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2018/02/14/chinese-new-year-the-worlds-largest-human-migration-is-about-to-begin-infographic/ So why do you claim China cannot compare to the West in Culture?
    3
  9617.  @saimalishahid1406   Where are those bad things of which you speak of? Every school teaches their students to some form of patriotism, even American students are taught their national anthem so how is what Chinese government doing any different? And now you are resorting to calling me mentally retarded? Why don't you attack my points instead of attacking me personally? I explained earlier that Uighur parents may not send their kids to school during their schooling age, so that's why some of the students featured here are adults. Because they missed out on school during their schooling age. And Saudi Arabia had it's own laws forbidding women from driving and women requiring male escort in public. What do you mean it's to protect their "chastity"? Are you implying that Muslim men will seize the opportunity to rape an unattended female just like that in Saudi Arabia?
    3
  9618.  @mohammadpanjshiripanjshiri6963  In the video, the staff member said that the longest someone took to make the bed was 3-4 months, and most of them actually accomplished it in a shorter duration.
    3
  9619.  @mohammadpanjshiripanjshiri6963  Why did you even flee your own conflicted-ridden Islamic country in the first place? It's your own Islamic homeland, yet you fled and become refugee in someone else's country? And you think the people of Britain really respect your religion, deep down inside their hearts? Look at how some Muslims extremists behave. Video: Protesters burn UK flag outside UK''s main mosque youtube.com/watch?v=uig1nYdZnrA It's because the UK government lets Muslims do whatever they want. The Westerners are bending over backwards to accommodate Muslims in their lands, and these Muslims extremists burn the United Kingdom Flag inside UK's main mosque?
    3
  9620.  @ken-yo2hz  President Xi Jinping has shown to be strong and capable leader, willing to tackle the mountain of corruption inherent within the Chinese communist party (which previous Chinese leaders like Hu Jintao and Jiang Zemin refused to touch) and governing a country of 1.4 billion (certainly no easy feat!) so I see nothing wrong personally with leaving him in power to maximise the benefits to China.
    3
  9621. The people on Guam Island can't even vote for the US President, yet Guam is part of the United States of America?
    3
  9622.  Anonymous Panacea  The United States has no qualms supporting authoritarian regimes with human rights issues, like Saudi Arabia, then can't the U.S do the same with China, despite our differences?
    3
  9623. China needs the pork anyway, so lifting the ban doesn't harm China. But Canada missed out on the opportunity to exert economic leverage, so too bad for Canada.
    3
  9624. Putin is a self-made man indeed.
    3
  9625. You hope? School closure may be short-term fun for the kids, but may result in long-term damage to its education system and eventually a shortage of people entering the workforce when they graduate, possibly affecting Hong Kong's economy even further.
    3
  9626.  @Yes-ri5dk  Hong Kong schools should indeed expel these kids who become absent for protesting. Hopefully this matter would be settled by the time school reopens in Hong Kong.
    3
  9627. Many Chinese warmly welcome Americans to our lands as visitors (just ask the expats here). However, many Americans are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands with suspicion.
    3
  9628.  @Satyam-pj5ii  China literally help Vietnam gain independence from France. During the 1st Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons (ranging from artillery guns to rifles and machine-guns), ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help Vietnam fight for independence from the French. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Indochina_War#China From 1950 to 1954, the Chinese government shipped goods, materials, and medicine worth $43 billion (in 2019 dollars) to Vietnam. From 1950 to 1956, the Chinese government had also shipped 155,000 small arms, 58 million rounds of ammunition, 4,630 artillery pieces, 1,080,000 artillery shells, 840,000 hand grenades, 1,400,000 uniforms, 1,200 vehicles, 14,000 tons of food, and 26,000 tons of fuel to Vietnam.
    3
  9629.  @Satyam-pj5ii  During the Vietnam War, China supplied Vietnam with 5,670 sets of uniforms, 5,670 pairs of shoes, 567 tons of rice, 20.7 tons of salt, 55.2 tons of meat, 20.7 tons of fish, 20.7 tons of sesame and peanuts, 20.7 tons of beans, 20.7 tons of lard, 6.9 tons of soy sauce, 20,7 tons of white sugar, 8,000 toothbrushes, 11,100 tubes of toothpaste, 35,300 bars of soap, and 109,000 cases of cigarettes. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/China_in_the_Vietnam_War#Military_aid_given_to_North_Vietnam_by_China#Confronting_U.S._escalation From 1964-1975, China provided Vietnam with 1,922,897 Guns, 64,529 Artillery pieces, 1,048,207,000 Bullets, 17,074,000 Artillery shells, Radio transmitters, 48,922 Telephones, 560 Tanks, 164 Planes and 15,771 Automobiles. Where would Vietnam be if not for Chinese aid given to Vietnam during the Vietnam War?
    3
  9630. Hong Kong's Chief Executive Carrie Lam, won the 2017 three way, garnering over 777 votes out of the 1,194-member Election Committee (which consist of Hong Kong groups) so she was voted into power by Hong Kong people. How is this not democracy?
    3
  9631. @Pub Comrad Why do you want to the CCP regime to be removed from power? China today is currently the world's 2nd largest economy, so CCP's collapse would send economic shock waves throughout world markets and possibly result in global recession as Chinese investments dry up and Chinese companies close down and fire their employees. So why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to the world?
    3
  9632.  @AbdulDean448  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    3
  9633. Glad to hear such a viewpoint from a Hong Kong Chinese Canadian like yourself. Just like your username, there's another HK Chinese Canadian in the comments, that goes by the name of mark yeung, and he appears to worship the "Western mindset," to the point that he's unable to see beyond what's presented to him in Western media.
    3
  9634.  Steve Bingham  What's your beef against communism? Previously, China was dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country under the so-called "democratic" Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949). But after the Communist revolution, the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. Such a political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) yet you're clearly against seeing China's rise under such a political system?
    3
  9635.  @zackk4969  “Diary of a Madman”.《狂人日记》 is a work of fiction by Lu Xun, then why are you confusing fiction with reality?
    3
  9636.  @santhankumar.p  India is actually one of the world's most racially intolerant country according to a survey in by Swedish. Source: A fascinating map of the world’s most and least racially tolerant countries washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2013/05/15/a-fascinating-map-of-the-worlds-most-and-least-racially-tolerant-countries/
    3
  9637.  @soundbite290  "神州 Shenzhou you're laughable. Don't you realize how obvious your channel makes you look." What's wrong with my channel? I don't upload any videos so what makes you think I am online CCP government troll? For talking about Hong Kong?
    3
  9638.  Mustafa Abu Bakr  Uighurs in Xinjiang live in China, so they are bound to China's laws, just like Muslims in Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia are bound to Saudi laws. What's wrong with teaching Uighurs to put China above their religion? We are teaching them to put the country above their God/Allah that's all.
    3
  9639.  Lolrtfyu Lolytfru  Xinjiang was part of China before Islam itself was born, and was first referred to as "Xiyu" (Chinese: 西域) under the Han dynasty, which drove the Xiongnu out of the region in 60 BCE (Han–Xiongnu War) in an effort to build and secure the profitable Silk Road. Then the Islamic invaders conquered the region and converted the natives to Islam, so why can't China convert them back to being Chinese?
    3
  9640. China help the USA pull out of the 2008 financial crisis, by buying off $1.2 trillion ($1,200,000,000,000) dollars worth of US debt.
    3
  9641.  @jtf873  I think you misinterpreted Henry Kissinger's statement. The Ukrainians are learning the hard way right now what happens when they become a friend of the US.
    3
  9642.  @jtf873  If that's my interpretation, then your interpretation is only just that as well. As for the nuclear weapons, they belonged to the former Soviet Union of which Russia and Ukraine were a part of. After the USSR dissolved, Russia was meant to be the inheritor of the Soviet Union, which was why the nuclear weapons in Ukraine were transferred over to Russia.
    3
  9643.  @thedaredevil1907  You said: "And it's said for the people of China they really do deserve better than what they get. I hope yall take your country back chang I really do. From some American" Why do you want Chinese people to overthrow our government? The collapse of the Communist Party of China would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China?
    3
  9644.  @MarkYeung1  Numbers do not lie. For your information, there are actually more Hong Kong Chinese living in Mainland China than there are in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and so on. Here are the numbers: Hongkongers (Total population c. 7.33 million) Regions with significant populations 1. Hong Kong (7,234,800) 2. Mainland China (472,900) 3. United States (330,000) 4. Canada (215,775) 5. United Kingdom (145,000) 6. Taiwan (87,719) 7. Australia (86,886) 8. Macau (19,355) 9. Netherlands (18,300) 10. Japan (18,210) 12. Malaysia (3,000) ... Source: Wikipedia: Hongkongers So according to the above, there are more Hong Kong Chinese living in mainland China than there are in the US, Canada, UK, Taiwan island, etc. (if you have an alternative source with different figures, I would gladly hear you out).
    3
  9645.  @soshyaldistansingh6628  The Malays had welcomed Chinese and Indians long before Malaysia became a British colony. Since 1229, Mongol expeditionary forces under Kublai Khan arrived in Borneo, and many of the Khan's Chinese followers settled on the island with Chinese traders after the campaign, and were welcomed by the indigenous people. Mind you, this was before British colonization.
    3
  9646.  @MansMan42069  Yes, it appears in general that the colonial mindset tends to affect Chinese more than its does for Malays. Even from my experience at least, the Chinese in Hong Kong are perhaps the most notable examples.
    3
  9647.  @HamguyBacon  China has 56 different ethnic groups including Han, Uighurs, Kazakhs, Tibetan, Mongol, Manchu, even Korean living at the border with North Korea. Han is the most dominant ethnic group, but not everyone is forced to call themselves Han. In fact, Chinese government offer special privileges to ethnic minority such as tax exemption, priority in healthcare, free education up to 15 years (only 9 years for Han), education bursaries and so on.
    3
  9648.  @biggpicture2930  "You think meritocracy belongs only to ancient China?" Meritocracy clearly originated in ancient China. The earliest example of meritocracy dates back to ancient China back in 600 BC. Throughout the next years, meritocracy probably spread to other parts of the world, including to England where Issac Newton was born in 1643. Mao's Red Guards were the result of communist ideology, not meritocracy.
    3
  9649.  @biggpicture2930  "Shenzhou. You still have yet to answer the question?" I've already did. 11 Dash Line is maintained by Taiwan after the ROC fled the mainland. PRC modified it to the 9 Dash Line. Also, the South China Sea Islands are uninhabited, so can it truly be considered colonization when there were no people living in those islands? "They won't draw any lines to say keep out! What is the point when I am going to annex your country"" What country? The South China Seas Islands are uninhabited.
    3
  9650.  @johwck1898  "Melacca sultanate in the 16th century, barely resist the Protugese, Dutch and British. That is a long long 450 years." You're talking about the start of colonization. 16th Century Melacca Sultanate was not as technologically advanced as the colonial powers of Portuguese, Dutch and Britain. Many neighboring states at that time like Indonesia also became colonies to the colonial powers like Dutch. But I'm talking mostly about post-colonization, about the lingering effects of colonization on the minds of the local people after the colonizers left. From my own experience, I find the colonial mentality to be more prominent in Singapore than in Malaysia today.
    3
  9651.  @marcioleonardo9859  The US government instigate coup in Bolivia and overthrow their democratically leader, Evo Morales, just because Tesla wanted access to Bolivia's lithium mines for their electric vehicles. Even Tesla CEO Elon Musk tweeted "We will coup whoever we want. Deal with it." Source: ‘We will coup whoever we want’: Elon Musk sparks online riot with quip about overthrow of Bolivia’s Evo Morales rt.com/news/495820-musk-coup-bolivia-lithium-tesla/
    3
  9652.  @jibsmokestack1  I'm surprised as well. When it comes to China, Cyrus Janssen knows that China isn't anything like how it is being portrayed in the west. Yet when it comes to Russia, he seems to support the western narrative regarding Russia.
    3
  9653. Politics should be about doing what's right, not what's popular. Sometimes the popular thing may not be right, and the right thing may not be popular. Democracy is only doing what's popular, not necessarily what's right. For example, President Trump came to power by seducing people's votes and making false promises of making America great again. And the Americans actually bought it, and voted for him, even when he has zero political experience. The thing is that not every US citizen can be trusted to be politically savvy enough to make the right decision regarding the future of their country, and to vote responsibly. Some voters even choose not to vote, or submitted a blank vote, which skew the polls in favor of Trump. In China's case, if Chinese people want change, then they simply join the government and must work their way up by garnering votes from other communist members, who are politically savvy and aware of China's political situation. It is not a perfect system, but in the end, the government can produce leaders like President Xi Jinping, whom have at least 30 year of experience. In my opinion, getting into politics shouldn't be easy. You are charting the course of a country of 1.4 billion (300 million for USA) so your leaders shoudn't be able to just waltz into power (like Trump waltzing into the White House). How can Americans entrust the future of your country to someone without political experience like Trump?
    3
  9654. Japanese government is capitalist that's why they rather just release those irradiated waters into the sea, rather than spend more money into building more storage space or better treatment facilities. I mean, why not cancel the Tokyo Olympics and use the money to treat the irradiated water? Capitalism that's why, because it's not profitable.
    3
  9655. China will donate 100,000 test kits; 100,000 surgical masks; 10,000 N95 masks; and 10,000 sets of personal protective equipment to Philippines. Source: China to donate medical supplies, equipment to PH to help fight Covid-19 manilatimes.net/2020/03/18/news/latest-stories/china-to-donate-medical-supplies-equipment-to-ph-to-help-fight-covid-19/704145/
    3
  9656. Hollywood is a propaganda arm to whitewash CIA's clandestine activities, through movies like the Double O Seven (James Bond) series to make spying activities and espionage seem cool and necessary to audiences.
    3
  9657.  @distinctga5811  You said: "America isn't like China, it is not a monolith. It is far more diverse in thought, ethnicity, culture, race and nationality." Likewise, China is not the United States, yet why'd you seemingly want to impose the American way of thinking onto China? China has our own way of thinking, derived from 5,000 years of history, literature from philosophers like Confucius, Laozi, and is perhaps among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Egypt, and Rome eventually succumbed to history. Throughout our thousands of years of history, China has witness the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous empires, and yet China has survived the oftentimes violent passage of time to the modern era relatively intact, while other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Egypt and Rome haven't. China is a civilization to be studied, not lectured at. You said: "Lastly, the CCP sucks." This is precisely the kind of remark I get whenever I bring up examples of China's accomplishments under communist party leadership. You said: "If they were so great, they'd be able to keep up with the Taiwanese, Cantonese or Singaporeans." Mainland China has surpassed Taiwan island, Hong Kong SAR, and Singapore. For example, mainland China's GDP (nominal) is ranked 2nd in the world, while Taiwan island's is ranked 21st, Singapore's is ranked 37th, while Hong Kong SAR's is ranked 42nd. according to the IMF. Mainland China is the manufacturing hub of the world and while previously there were Made-in-Taiwan and Made-in-Hong Kong (not sure about Singapore), but they have been outsourced to the mainland, and nowadays, almost everything is Made-in-China. You said: "All Chinese, but only one Communist government: I think you get the point." I do, but do you yourself get the point? Throughout its 5,000 years of history, China has always been under the authoritarian rule of the Emperor and the Imperial Court, and even today, China's political system under the President and the Communist Party of China closely emulate the governing system of China's past. Because history has shown that China benefits from having a strong central government so why is it surprising for you to learn that there should be one government in charge of China?
    3
  9658.  @Hhhh22222-w  I generally agree, but I think speaking Russian isn't a requirement to find out the truth. Like Cyrus, I don't speak Russian either, yet I bothered to research and hear out arguments from both sides before coming to a conclusion.
    3
  9659. It's America's athelete's loss if they boycott the 2022 Beijing Olympics. More gold medals for China then.
    3
  9660.  @MarkYeung1  You said: " But China cut its coal import from Australia despite high demand and blackout." You're wrong. Customs data for the final quarter of 2021 show that China imported 6.2 million tons of Australian coking coal, along with another 5.5 million tons of thermal coal from Australia. Who said China cut its coal import from Australia when the figures show Chinese imports of Australian coal? Please verify your sources claiming that China somehow impose sanction on Australian coal.
    3
  9661. Meanwhile, Western journalists continue to predict an economic hard landing for China. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2021 Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    3
  9662. +BoloYung Perhaps, but it goes to show that other countries have also intentionally imposed complete ban on Chinese names for decades, so I don't think the government being unreasonable by banning about 20 or so Muslim names, when Indonesian government done much worse to Chinese Indonesians for decades.
    3
  9663.  @glassking8629  With the USA, you are under the control of the U.S miltary industrial complex and forced to serve U.S hegemonic interests.
    3
  9664.  @vchanpe1  You said: "I like the American people but I dislike the American government." But it's principally the American people who are responsible for the American government coming into power when they cast their votes during elections. At least the majority who voted anyway.
    3
  9665.  @Andy-P  Whereas the U.S is prolonging the war, by sending multi-launch rocket systems to Ukraine.
    3
  9666.  @Andy-P  Whereas the America is prolonging the conflict by sending lethal aid to Ukraine.
    3
  9667.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou I don't think so. Taiwan & Japan won't give up territory without a fight." Neither will mainland China with Taiwan island, and the People's Liberation Army exercises has made it clear recently how committed China is to reunify Taiwan island. As for Japan, the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands were originally part of China before Japan occupied them during the war. After Japan's WW2 surrender, Japan agreed to relinquish all their previously occupied territory, so shouldn't those islands be returned back to China?
    3
  9668. Exactly. Before Hong Kong's handover back to mainland China in 1997, Hong Kong was under British colonial rule and the 1956 HK riots resulted in 59 deaths while the 1967 HK riots resulted in 51 deaths. Yet today under the 2019 Hong Kong riots, their have been zero deaths by Hong Kong Police this far. So the HK police have shown remarkable restraint thus far. But even restraint has its limits.
    3
  9669.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "America needs smarter policies towards China." and I'm pointing out that the recent U.S ambassadors to China don't even speak/understand the Chinese language, then how to have good American policy towards China?
    3
  9670. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (largest economy by GDP PPP), the world's factory (Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all bee achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China.
    3
  9671. America is not "immune" to fallout from a trade war, and China will retaliate if the United States wants a trade war.
    3
  9672.  @mrjingles821  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Which country do you think is the real threat to global peace and stability?
    3
  9673. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    3
  9674. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    3
  9675. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    3
  9676.  @danpan001  The native aborigine people in Taiwan were descended from farmers from mainland China that arrived on the island some 5,000 years ago. Around 5,000 years ago, farmers from the southeast Chinese coast settled on the island. These people are believed to have been speakers of Austronesian languages, which dispersed from Taiwan across the islands of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The current Taiwanese aborigines are believed to be their descendants. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan)
    3
  9677.  @unfortunato  Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous affair with a much older man has been exposed, and she's expressed a desire for personal privacy in a videocall with IOC. But the WTA would have none of that, and they are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see, instead of respecting her wish for privacy.
    3
  9678. Biden supported US invasion in Iraq, resulting in the deaths of some 200,000 Iraqi civilians according to ( iraqbodycount.org )
    3
  9679.  @abbotsful  Could you tell me exactly what of the Four Olds (四旧) was destroyed and not recovered today? How much of that compares with the 5,000 years of Chinese history and culture that remains till today?
    3
  9680.  @abbotsful  Egyptian Hieroglyphs are no longer in use, neither is Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia). And together with Latin, these languages are considered dead languages, since they aren't evolving with the times and no new words have been being added into their vocabulary. Whereas Chinese characters are still in widespread use today, and Mandarin Chinese is the world's most spoken language by number of native speakers. Apart from ancient script, Chinese history has the names of all 600+ rulers of China recorded throughout Chinese history, from Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors (三皇五帝) (2852–2070 BC) Xia dynasty (夏朝) (2070–1600 BC) Shang dynasty (商朝) (1600–1046 BC) Zhou dynasty (周朝) (1046–256 BC) Qin dynasty (秦朝) (221–207 BC) Han dynasty (漢朝) (202 BC–9 AD, 25–220 AD) Three Kingdoms (三國) (220–280 AD) Jin dynasty (晉朝) (266–420 AD) Sixteen Kingdoms (十六國) (304–439 AD) Northern and Southern Dynasties (南北朝) (386–589 AD) Sui dynasty (隋朝) (581–619 AD) Tang dynasty (唐朝) (618–690 AD, 705–907 AD) Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms (五代十國) (907–979 AD) Liao dynasty (遼朝) (916–1125 AD) Song dynasty (宋朝) (960–1279 AD) Western Xia (西夏) (1038–1227 AD) Jin dynasty (金朝) (1115–1234 AD) Yuan dynasty (元朝) (1271–1368 AD) Qing dynasty (清朝) (1636–1912 AD) Empire of China (中華帝國) (1915–1916 AD) and the People's Republic of China (中华人民共和国)
    3
  9681.  @abbotsful  China can recite the names of all 600+ leaders of China in whichever period. For example: Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors (三皇五帝) (2852–2070 BC) 3162–2962 BC Yǒucháo 有巢 2962–2852 BC Suìrén 燧人 2852–2737 BC Fúxī 伏羲 2737–2698 BC Yándì 炎帝 2698–2598 BC Huángdì 黃帝 2597–2514 BC Shǎohào 少昊 2514–2436 BC Zhuānxū 顓頊 2436–2366 BC Dìkù 帝嚳 2366–2358 BC Dìzhì 帝摯 2356–2255 BC Dìyáo or Táng Yáo 帝堯 / 唐堯 2255–2208 BC Dìshùn or Yú Shùn 帝舜 / 虞舜 ...
    3
  9682.  @abbotsful  Xia dynasty (夏朝) (2070–1600 BC) 2150–2106 BC Yǔ 禹 2106–2077 BC Qǐ 啟 2077–2048 BC Kāng 康 2048–2036 BC Kāng 康 2036–2008 BC Xiāng 相 1968–1946 BC Kāng 康 1946–1929 BC Zhù 杼 1929–1885 BC Huái 槐 1885–1867 BC Máng 芒 1867–1851 BC Xiè 泄 1851–1792 BC Jiàng 降 1792–1771 BC Jiōng 扃 1771–1750 BC Jǐn 廑 1750–1719 BC Kǒng Jiǎ 孔甲 1719–1708 BC Gāo 阜 1708–1689 BC Fā 發 1689–1658 BC Jié 桀 Shang dynasty (商朝) (1600–1046 BC) 1658–1629 BC Tiān Yǐ 天乙 1629–1627 BC Wài Bǐng 外丙 1627–1623 BC Tài Jiǎ 太甲 1623–1611 BC Zhōng Rén 中壬 1611–1592 BC Wò Dīng 沃丁 1592–1567 BC Tài Gēng 太庚 1567–1550 BC Xiǎo Jiǎ 小甲 1550–1538 BC Yōng Jǐ 雍己 1538–1463 BC Tài Wù 太戊 1463–1452 BC Zhòng Dīng 仲丁 1452–1437 BC Wài Rén 外壬 1437–1428 BC Hé Dān Jiǎ 河亶甲 1428–1409 BC Zǔ Jǐ 祖己 1409–1393 BC Zǔ Xīn 祖辛 1393–1368 BC Wò Jiǎ 沃甲 1368–1336 BC Zǔ Dīng 祖丁 1336–1307 BC Nán Gēng 南庚 1307–1290 BC Yáng Jiǎ 陽甲 1290–1262 BC Pán Gēng 盤庚 1262–1259 BC Xiǎo Xīn 小辛 1259–1250 BC Xiǎo Yǐ 小乙 1250–1192 BC Wǔ Dīng 武丁 1192–1185 BC Zǔ Gēng 祖庚 1185–1158 BC Zǔ Jiǎ 祖甲 1158–1152 BC Lǐn Xīn 廩辛 1152–1147 BC Gēng Dīng 庚丁 1147–1112 BC Wǔ Yǐ 武乙 1112–1102 BC Wénwǔ Dīng/ Wén Dīng 文武丁 / 文丁 1101–1076 BC Dì Yǐ 帝乙 1075–1046 BC Xīn (Zhou) 辛(紂) ....
    3
  9683.  @abbotsful  Zhou dynasty (周朝) (1046–256 BC) _Western Zhou (西周) (1046–771 BC) _ 1100–1050 BC King Wén 文王 1046–1043 BC King Wǔ 武王 1042–1021 BC King Chéng 成王 1020–996 BC King Kāng 康王 995–977 BC King Zhāo 昭王 976–922 BC King Mù 穆王 922–900 BC King Gōng 共王 899–892 BC King Yì 懿王 891–886 BC King Xiào 孝王 885–878 BC King Yí 夷王 877–841 BC King Lì 厲王 Gonghe Regency (共和) (841–827 BC) 27–782 BC King Xuān 宣王 781–771 BC King Yōu 幽王
    3
  9684.  @abbotsful  Eastern Zhou (東周) (770–256 BC) Spring and Autumn period (春秋時代) (770–476 BC) 770–720 BC King Ping 平王 719–697 BC King Huan 桓王 696–682 BC King Zhuang 莊王 681–677 BC King Xi 釐王 676–652 BC King Hui 惠王 651–619 BC King Xiang 襄王 618–613 BC King Qing 頃王 612–607 BC King Kuang 匡王 606–586 BC King Ding 定王 585–572 BC King Jian 簡王 571–545 BC King Ling 靈王 544–521 BC King Jing 景王 520 BC King Dao 悼王 519–476 BC King Jing 敬王 ...
    3
  9685.  @abbotsful  Warring States period (戰國時代) (475–221 BC) 475–469 BC King Yuan 元王 468–442 BC King Zhending 貞定王 441 BC King Ai 哀王 441 BC King Si 思王 440–426 BC King Kao 考王 425–402 BC King Weilie 威烈王 401–376 BC King An 安王 375–369 BC King Lie 烈王 368–321 BC King Xian 顯王 320–315 BC King Shenjing 慎靚王 314–256 BC King Nan 赧王 ....
    3
  9686.  @abbotsful  Qin dynasty (秦朝) (221–207 BC) 255–251 BC Zhaoxiang of Qin 秦昭襄王 250 BC Xiaowen of Qin 秦孝文王 249–247 BC Zhuangxiang of Qin 秦莊襄王 246 221–210 BC Qin Shi Huang 秦始皇 209–207 BC Qin Er Shi 秦二世 207 BC Qin San Shi 秦三世
    3
  9687.  @abbotsful  "州 Shenzhou yep you said it : ‘China, 71 years of continuous history’" Where did I ever said those words here in this comment thread? Please quote me my exact words saying that "China, 71 years of continuous history"_ like you are accusing me of saying.
    3
  9688.  @abbotsful  "神州 Shenzhou you explained it, I didn't use quotation marks." You did use quotation marks, your said: "州 Shenzhou yep you said it : ‘China, 71 years of continuous history’" so where did I ever said those words here in this comment thread? Please quote me my words saying that: "China, 71 years of continuous history" like you accused me of saying."_ And President Xi Jinping has been compared to an Emperor, since the term limits have been abolished and he can theoretically rule for his lifetime. Like I said earlier, China has always been under the authoritarian rule of Emperors and the Imperial Court, and we technically still are today, under President Xi Jinping and the Communist Party of China.
    3
  9689.  @abbotsful  "神州 Shenzhou I wasn’t quoting you, that’s just me mocking the ridiculous idea of ‘5000 years of history’ ." You were quoting me, there were clearly quotation marks when you said: "州 Shenzhou yep you said it : ‘China, 71 years of continuous history’" and you specifically mentioned that I was saying those words. So why cant you quote me my exact words saying "China, 71 years of continuous history" like you're accusing me of saying? Why is the idea of ‘5000 years of history’ considered ridiculous? Didn't you want to compare all the different rulers of Egypt over the millennia to China's 5000 years of history, then why is it you seem to acknowledge Egyptian history but not Chinese history? About the Mandate of Heaven (天命), it's a political philosophy which can be described as follows: -If a rebellion succeeds, then the leader is shown to be incompetent and is removed from power, as part of Heaven's Will. -If a rebellion fails, then the leader is shown to be competent and is allowed to remain in power, as part of Heaven's Will When you apply the Mandate of Heaven today, President Xi Jinping has shown to be a strong and competent leader, able to guide China through the Covid19 crisis in Wuhan, then can't he be allowed to remain in power? In order to maximise the benefits to China? Good leaders are in short supply and it would be a waste for a competent leader to have to step down as president, simply because of term limits.
    3
  9690.  @abbotsful  You were clearly quoting me, there were indeed quotation marks when you said: "州 Shenzhou yep you said it : ‘China, 71 years of continuous history’" so why do you claim you weren't quoting me? Why play all this word games, when all I asked was for you to quote me my exact words saying "China, 71 years of continuous history" like you're accusing me of saying? Can't you do that? Why is the idea of ‘5000 years of history’ considered ridiculous? You acknowledged Egyptian history yet you consider China's 5000 years of history ridiculous? And President Xi Jinping has shown to be a strong and competent leader then can't he remain in power in order to maximise the benefits to China? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    3
  9691.  @ShuyanStoryTeller  President Xi has shown to be a strong and competent leader, so why not allow him to remain in power in order to maximise the benefits to China? Good leaders are hard to come by, and it's a shame that good leaders have to prematurely terminate their policies, because of term limits.
    3
  9692.  @DIMA-q2o  North Korea has been experiencing improvements in quality of life as well as space launches, can't the people in North Korea support their leader? Meanwhile, many young South Koreans feel as though they are "living in hell." Capitalism in South Korea has created such a harsh work culture, with long working hours, growing inequality, that has given rise to a new term called Hell Joseon (헬조선).
    3
  9693.  @DIMA-q2o  Russia does conduct elections so doesn't that make it democracy? President Putin is even announcing his candidacy in the next Russian election.
    3
  9694.  Lynn Michael  Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that inflation in America is kept to a minimum and the cost of living in America is lower than it should be. Think of the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursuits like cars, housing, luxury brands, school fees, tuition fees and so on. Isn't that why many Americans flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money?
    3
  9695.  Lynn Michael  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA. The test is given every three years to 15-year-olds around the world and measures their knowledge in reading, science and mathematics. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html The best-performing students in all three subjects were in China. They attend schools in and around Beijing and Shanghai, and two provinces: Jiangsu and Zhejiang.
    3
  9696.  @anwaydas817  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. Ancient Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    3
  9697.  @anwaydas817  Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by the rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china) which were in great demand throughout the ancient world. Take Han Chinese traditional clothing Hanfu (汉服) for example and it has 5,000 years of history and even the Japanese Kimono and Korean Hanbok clothing have their origins in Chinese Hanfu. Video: Beautiful Traditional Costume: Han Chinese Clothing (Hanfu) youtu.be/T6CucJxiWec?t=5
    3
  9698.  @anwaydas817  Ancient Chinese invented paper and paper inventions like paper lanterns, toilet paper (which is high demand around the world) paper umbrellas and paper banknote (which made business transactions easier since merchants need not carry around lots of metal coinage and precious stones) Mankind's first aviation invention was in the form of paper kite, and even hot air balloons were invented in China, and were known as Sky Lanterns (天灯) or Kongming Lanterns (孔明灯) Here is beautiful video of RISE Lantern Festival in Las Vegas, celebrated with Chinese Sky Lanterns. Video: youtu.be/SNtwlBbBdb4?t=10 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    3
  9699.  @anwaydas817  Ancient Chinese invented gunpowder and gunpowder weapons like handcannons, handgrenades, landmines, naval mines, exploding cannonballs, rocket launchers, multi-launch rockets, and of course, fireworks. Americans celebrate the 4th of July with Chinese inventions, and world's oldest conformed surviving firearm is the Heilongjiang 黑龙江 handcannon, manufactured no later than 1288. Source: Heilongjiang hand cannon wikipedia.org/wiki/Heilongjiang_hand_cannon A 14th-century military treatise, the Huolongjing (Fire Dragon Manual), describes hollow cast iron cannonball shells filled with gunpowder. Source: Landmine wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_mine#Gunpowder Chinese records tell of naval explosives in the 16th century, used to fight against Japanese pirates (wokou) wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_mine#History Source: The earliest rocket launchers documented in imperial China consisted of arrows modified by the attachment of a rocket motor to the shaft a few inches behind the arrowhead. wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket_launcher#History Source: The first multiple rocket launchers were made during the mediaeval Chinese Song dynasty. wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_rocket_launcher#History
    3
  9700. Chinese people really don't feel that Xi is being granted too much power. The communist party voted him in and can always vote him off, if he fails to deliver on his promises. But the Western reporter keep digging for an answer from Chinese people when it isn't there.
    3
  9701.  @ne0ge049  But you said that China's miltary is a tenth the size of the U.S miltary, but already, the PLA is the world's largest land army and the PLA Navy has more ships than the U.S Navy, then how is China's miltary a tenth the size of the US military?
    3
  9702.  @Asyma88  Agreed. I'm Asian and I speak English to Westerners, yet nobody praise me for speaking their language, or even seem to think it's cool.
    3
  9703. America is suffering from a pandemic crisis (230,000 dead from Covid-19), a healthcare crisis (shortage of PPE), an economic crisis (50 million unemployed), a social crisis (George Floyd/BLM protests), even a climate crisis (California wildfires, hurricane flooding) and to top it all off, a leadership crisis (the Trump administration). Yet USA is blaming China for America's woes.
    3
  9704. Like what B Jiang said, China is 3rd country in world to demonstrate anti-satellite capabilities in 2007 by taking out a 750kg satellite in orbit a altitude of 865 km, with a missile launched from the ground. If PLA takes out Indian army satellites in space, then Indian ground troops will put at disadvantage without satellite communications and coordination.
    3
  9705. China survived 15,000 sanctions from USA. Russia survived 14 rounds of sanctions by the European Union. What doesn't kill you, only makes you stronger.
    3
  9706. American healthcare workers look overwhelmed, overworked, exhausted, ill-equipped facing shortage of masks, gloves, goggles, faceshields, PPE suits while the Chinese doctors and nurses look well-equipped in comparison.
    3
  9707. Virus mutation is random in nature and can occur anywhere, anytime, and it's not just limited to wet markets in China. Bird Flu, Swine Flu, H1N1, MERS (Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome) or other virus outbreak still happen regardless of wet markets in China, so why blame the wet market when virus mutation can occur anywhere?
    3
  9708. planetzito If the OP choose to bring up Japan then why can't Chinese talk about Japan as well since he brought it up? Why are you referring to this as a "they did it too" type of response, when adlerzwei brought it up first? What you are saying still doesn't change the fact Japan did copy Western car designs at some point, so you mean Chinese people aren't allowed to make such comments?
    3
  9709. planetzito What makes you think that I am a 50 cent party member? When did I ever mentioned the Communist Party of China here at all, for you to think that way?
    3
  9710. How is it different from any other country with its own laws? Westerners always complain about rude Chinese tourists behavior, about poor traffic in China, cars running red lights and people jaywalking, peeing and spitting in public. With this social credit system in place, people will be discouraged from such behavior, and are forbidden from flying out of China to visit other countries too, at least until their score improves.
    3
  9711. Nicki Myers China also has such laws in place against things like traffic offenses and spitting in public. But they clearly do not work, and Chinese people continue to break traffic laws and spit in public with impunity. So what's wrong with experimenting with a new approach that rewards good behavior and discourages bad behavior? Clearly, China is not the UK, and we should follow our own path to success and use our own approaches.
    3
  9712.  JarJarBinks  Here's another video about China's Nuclear Fusion reactor: Fusion: Making an artificial sun youtu.be/7ra1lCGmztU
    3
  9713.  JarJarBinks  Huawei has unveiled its new Kirin 990 chipset, the world's first 5G-integrated chipset, at the IFA (Internationale Funkausstellung Berlin) 2019 in Berlin, Germany. Video: Huawei introduces Kirin 990, the world's first 5G-integrated chipset youtu.be/TNKtG3t22Po The Kirin 990 series includes two models, the Kirin 990 and the Kirin 990 5G. The Kirin 990 5G is the smallest and one of the most energy-efficient 5G mobile phone chips in the industry.
    3
  9714.  @asserpopulous69  Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. And Huawei’s HiSilicon overtakes Qualcomm as China’s top smartphone processor supplier for first time. Huawei’s HiSilicon overtakes Qualcomm as China’s top smartphone processor supplier for first time scmp.com/tech/gear/article/3082057/huaweis-hisilicon-overtakes-qualcomm-chinas-top-smartphone-processor HiSilicon, Huawei Technologies’ in-house semiconductor and integrated circuit design company, has surpassed US chip giant Qualcomm in terms of smartphone processor shipments in China for the first time amid coronavirus-linked disruptions that have hit most major players, according to a report.
    3
  9715.  @jayshah3582  About alleged debt trap, Chinese President Xi Jinping has pledged to waive debts for the least developed African countries that have both high debt burdens and diplomatic ties with China. Speaking at the opening of a summit with African leaders in Beijing, Xi said his country would offer an extra $US60 billion ($83 billion) in financing to African countries. Source: China waives debt, promises 'no imposition of will' on African nations smh.com.au/world/asia/china-waives-debt-promises-no-imposition-of-will-on-african-nations-20180904-p501nr.html "In addition, for Africa's least developed countries, heavily indebted and poor countries, landlocked developing countries and small island developing countries that have diplomatic relations with China, the debt they have incurred in the form of interest-free Chinese government loans due to mature by the end of 2018 will be exempted," Xi said.
    3
  9716.  @HITESHGG  You're not defending the USA but you're accusing China of debt trap? Even experts have dispel claims of China debt-trap diplomacy in the Pacific. Source: Experts dispel claims of China debt-trap diplomacy in Pacific postcourier.com.pg/experts-dispel-claims-of-china-debt-trap-diplomacy-in-pacific/
    3
  9717. 3 years ago, I shared a similar aerial shot of Shanghai（ youtu.be/1cC-j4_NtvE?t=6 ）and Westerners were flabbergasted. Viewer discretion is advised, footage may cause some people to weep and rub their eyes in disbelief.
    3
  9718.  @havaianuu  You said: "BTW if Chiang Kai-shek had won, the Chinese people would be way better off" Chiang kai-shek was given the nickname "Cash-My-Cheque". Corruption was rampant among the Kuomintang, so much such that even US President Harry Truman made a remark about it and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", having taken $750 million in US aid. And even though the KMT enjoyed numerous advantages over the Communists, including massive wealth, military arms from the US, and superior numbers, yet in the end, they still lost the mainland to a bunch of poor, outnumbered, peasants, and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing CPC's rule over China.
    3
  9719.  @yslee1401  If you're claiming Taiwan is a country, then why do they call themselves the Republic of China in their constitution? This shows that they consider Taiwan as part of China, if not then why haven't they formally declared independence? Is there some force preventing them from doing so?
    3
  9720.  @yslee1401  You said: "Shenzhou. they don’t spit on the streets like many mainlanders do." Obviously you've never been to Asia. Koreans spit on the streets, you can easily find uploaded videos of them doing exactly that. It's just that you harbor disdain for mainland Chinese that's all.
    3
  9721.  @yslee1401  Why can't PLA Navy warships conduct naval exercises along the Taiwan Strait? Japanese warships travel through the Taiwan strait. Even Australian Navy ships travel through the Taiwan strait, so why can't PLA Navy conduct naval exercise there?
    3
  9722.  Charles Schmid  Why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? This shows KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while solidifying the CPC's right to rule the mainland.
    3
  9723. Turkiye wasted 20 years on the waiting list to enter the EU, while Russia and China have welcomed Turkiye's application to join BRICS. The unipolar world is dying and the multipolar world is being born.
    3
  9724. 说的对，沙特阿拉伯突然宣布，装备中国解放军东风21导弹。
    3
  9725.  @miltonfriedman3593  Protectionism? According to Global Trade Alert, since 2008 America is world's most protectionist country having taken over 800 protectionist measures, while European countries has 300-400 of such measures, whereas China only has 200-300 of such measures. Source: Protectionist measures taken 2008–2013 according to Global Trade Alert wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Protectionist_measures_taken_2008%E2%80%932013_according_to_Global_Trade_Alert.png
    3
  9726. ​ @miltonfriedman3593  The U.S is the most protectionist nation businessinsider.com/the-us-is-the-most-protectionist-nation-2015-9/?r=US&IR=T The country that imposes the most restrictions on trade might surprise you. It isn't China, Mexico, or Japan. It is the United States
    3
  9727.  @Birdylockso  Personal freedoms may be sacrificed because of lockdowns, but once the Covid-19 cases are under control, then reopening will bring back those freedoms. For example, Wuhan has reopened, Shenzhen has reopened, and eventually Shanghai will reopen once the cases are under control. However, once the elderly lose their lives because of Covid, then there's no way to bring them back. Is it worth sacrificing someone's parents and grandparents, just for a temporary suspension of personal freedoms?
    3
  9728.  @adamiskandar5107  Agreed. Even some expats who have lived in China for years now, still may not fully understand this concept among Chinese. Oftentimes, Chinese culture is stereotyped as loving money, but Chinese also love health more. The Chinese adage goes "Good heath is the best form of wealth." (健康是最大的财富)
    3
  9729.  @Damo-ml3fc  Yes, we shouldn't generalize across the different cities, but perhaps other Chinese cities local governments could learn lessons from cities that handled the outbreak well like Shenzhen, and from those that handle it badly like Shanghai, and perhaps come up with their own strategies.
    3
  9730.  @stargate8811  But Singapore is a population of 5 million, whereas Shanghai has a population of 25 million, so how can you compare Singapore with Shanghai? Singapore's model could possibly work on Hong Kong with their population of 7 million, but I don't think it will work with a 5x larger population like in Shanghai.
    3
  9731.  @Birdylockso  I see. I guess I must have misread your comment. Indeed, I agree with you that human beings aren't always as rational all the time, and rationality can be drowned out by emotion at times. But hopefully like you said, China will pass this trial.
    3
  9732. +Robert Hardy Making a bold statement like "Taiwan has never been ruled by the PRC for a single day and NEVER will be." is controversial (esp. the "never will be" part) because you'll never know for sure whether in the future, Taiwan will be ruled by the PRC.
    3
  9733. I've also often seen the symbol of a yellow trident 🔱in a blue 🟦background and it turns out that it's the emblem of the OUN
    3
  9734.  @CalvinK-the_old_fogey  But certainly not Nauru, who just recently severed diplomatic ties with Taiwan island and switched its recognition to mainland China instead, following most of the other countries in the world in doing so.
    3
  9735. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my "神州 Shenzhou NOT enough talents in China." Chinese universities train the world's largest number of STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) at 4.7 million, how's that not enough talents?
    3
  9736. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my So Japan hasn't launch a space station into orbit like China can, yet you think China can't compete because of a mechanical pencil?
    3
  9737. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my "神州 Shenzhou your space station uses foreign parts." Which parts are foreign? As far as I know, China's Tiangong space station is entirely built and run by China. Also, you seem to have no problem with Japan using the one Americans have, yet why can't they build one of their own?
    3
  9738. How does establishing diplomatic relations with Taiwan even help the world? Mainland China is sending urgent medical supplies, especially to Italy (when all the EU members ignored the outbreak in Italy)
    3
  9739.  @RequiescatInPace  Agreed. It's not the fault of the religion itself. Like in the Israel-Palestine conflict, there are atrocities being committed such as the bombing of hospitals by the IDF, but no where in Christianity or Judaism do they condone this sort of behavior.
    3
  9740. I applaud the opinion put forth by Fred Teng (滕绍骏) the gentleman on the top-right of the panel. I love his bluntness in addressing the situation in Hong Kong.
    3
  9741. +Jolo Makinamo It was quite clear that except for logistical problems, American tanks were still largely inferior to German tanks at the start of WWII. That was my original statement I believe and it still stands thus far. During warfare, tank technology will definitely improve, but the main point was that the Americans absorbed German Panzer technology after WWII and that's that's why their tanks are so powerful today. The point about rocketry is that Nazi V2 Rocket scientists were put to work on the NASA Moon missions, so its clear that America copied German technology. Just like how China copied Russia's rockets. The point I am trying to illustrate is that every country copies from others at some point in history. Even when the Americans had their own MG, they still absorbed German MG42 technology and that's why they form the core of American MGs. This adds to my point that the Americans absorbed German technology in the form of MG technology. By skipping RND and straightaway adopting the German softbore barrels, America is doing exactly what China is doing now, except in the past. Once again, this adds to my point that America copied German technology. I'm not caring who makes what, its the fact that every country copies from one another at some point in history, even America.
    3
  9742.  @hyc1266  Sure go ahead and re-post it. Knowledge should be shared, people should draw wisdom from multiple sources.
    3
  9743.  @danfisher7458  Spam bot? I only posted a grand total of 2 posts on this thread. Why not attempt to refute my points instead of hurling insults my way?
    3
  9744.  @chaospilot2142  Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk route came various luxurious Chinese goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china) etc, which were in high demand throughout the ancient world. Chinese merchants certainly had a head for business.
    3
  9745.  @chaospilot2142  So you're saying "神州 Shenzhou Tariffs are part of China since ancient times" is wrong? My bad then. Go ahead and delete your statement then.
    3
  9746.  @chaospilot2142  Really? Why the ROC lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa? From what I understand, during Chinese Civil War, the communists were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were crappy, and they had far fewer numbers (they had mere 50 members at the beginning in 1921) as compared to the Kuomintang. Whereas the KMT had wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training, superior numbers over the communists. Yet the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to China? This demonstrates KMT's sheer incompetence in ruling the mainland, so how are they the real China then?
    3
  9747.  @ynwaaiy9640  美分狗看到我，都不打个招呼，马上吠叫警告别人别跟我斗。
    3
  9748. As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality.
    3
  9749.  @zackk4969  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"? Video: Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' youtu.be/DPt-zXn05ac
    3
  9750.  @zackk4969  “Diary of a Madman”.《狂人日记》 is a work of fiction by Lu Xun, then why are you confusing fiction with reality?
    3
  9751.  @p46709394  said "India especially good at IT, too." China has produced many Internet companies like, Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, JD, Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, etc, and in smartphones, Chinese brands like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, ZTE, Lenovo, etc are expanding, But where are the famous Indian IT companies then? Source: Wikipedia: List of largest Internet companies
    3
  9752.  @christopherhamlin6139  During the Vietnam War, American soldiers slept with Vietnamese women and impregnated them, but instead of taking responsibility, they abandoned them and withdrew from Saigon, leaving the women to raise their offspring in Vietnam. So I have no idea why you think the people of Vietnam love America after what they did to them.
    3
  9753.  @dertythegrower  "Shenzhou. America does not have term limits for politicians, incorrect..." Why hasn't any US president served beyond 8 years then?
    3
  9754. Can you name the human rights violations against the Ugyhurs? As ethnic minority in China, Ugyhurs are not subjected to One Child Policy, unlike Han Chinese, and they can have as many kids as they can support. Under Chinese government laws, Ugyhurs enjoy special tax exemptions, healthcare benefits and educational bursaries, such as free education up to university. For example, if Han Chinese need, say 600 points to qualify for a university course, Ugyhurs need only 300 points (easier to qualify) than the Han Chinese.
    3
  9755.  @googlerwunn7344  "神州 Shenzhou with all due respect, I'm not persuaded by your logic." Explain to me then, who voted and put those U.S politicians in power? Answer: American citizens themselves (majority of them anyway). Here's George Carlin explaining the logic youtu.be/HeMGqTwWA6U
    3
  9756.  @googlerwunn7344  The U.S politicians were voted into power by American citizens themselves (majority of them anyway) so if anyone is to assign blame, why aren't American citizens blaming themselves for putting such U.S politicians into power? You can't refute my logic, so you just deny it that's all.
    3
  9757.  @googlerwunn7344  "神州 Shenzhou there's nothing to argue." Since there's no further argument from you, I assume you agree with my logic that American citizens only have themselves to blame for electing their politicians? Since you said there's nothing to argue?
    3
  9758.  @googlerwunn7344  Why not answer my questions first, if you want your questions answered? Do you agree that Americans (majority of them anyway) are responsible for electing their politicians into power? Afterall, I have answered your question of where I'm from, it's only fair that you answer my question.
    3
  9759. China should follow our own path to success, instead of just blindly emulating Western democracy.
    3
  9760.  @dawei666  What new rules? You're the one mentioning the crackdown on "effeminate" males, that means you should know of some effeminate actors or celebrities that have been affected. Couldn't you at least give an example to support your claims?
    3
  9761. Where did you people hear such false rumors about China? China sees an average of 180,000 protests every year (or average 500 protests every day) but does the government arrest every single one of those protestors?
    3
  9762. Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous relation with a much older man has been revealed, that's why she's avoiding the public eye recently. But the WTA are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life details for all the world to see, instead of respecting her privacy.
    3
  9763.  @abyyy490  How is manufacturing becoming a legacy? The US President elect is promising to bring manufacturing jobs back to the USA. As for IPs, China applies for more patents, trademarks and industrial designs than any other in the world, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators
    3
  9764. +Jovan Lee Then how do you propose to solve this problem, if Taiwan rejected One Country, Two Systems policy? We offered you a solution, yet you rejected it then what exactly do you want? If you declare independence for Taiwan, then the communist party won't allow an official declaration of independence and will exercise the military option if necessary. You think that is a better solution is that it?
    3
  9765.  @jonathanswarnapati9833  You're not even from Taiwan, yet you just claim Taiwan will fight?
    3
  9766.  @gmw3083  @M B 2.0 Musk should purchase YouTube as well, and implement his freedom of speech policies here as well.
    3
  9767.  @hiroshiyamashita2090  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    3
  9768.  @norvikgrigorian4518  Surveys in China have revealed that a vast majority of Chinese support the Chinese government. One definition of democracy is that the government is able to deliver what the people want, so isn't China in a sense, more democratic than the US according to this definition? Because the US government isn't able to deliver what Americans want.
    3
  9769. +Thessalian Just because the West accepts such behavior, doesn't automatically mean that other countries should follow suite. Even in America, there is opposition towards transgender bathroom. Imagine if you are straight girl, and suddenly a transgender woman just walks into the ladies room. Won't this be vulnerable to exploitation by perverts dressing up to enter woman's bathroom? There was even a tragic shooting at a gay club in Orlando, presumably perpetrated by a conservative who was against LGBT issues.
    3
  9770. What about during the Urumqi Riots, where Uyghur rioters stab and kill Han Chinese passers-by and then broke into Han businesses and looted them? At least now, the CCP is providing free education to the Uyghur and helping them find jobs.
    3
  9771.  @erinobrien8793  You said: "Yes, but how well are they building those infrastructures? China isn't known for their building integrity." China is home to many of the world's largest bridges, tallest bridges and highest bridges, how is China not known for their building integrity? China is home to the world's largest high speed railway, more than the rest of the world. China is also home to the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam. The huge dam holds back such a huge volume of water that it slows the Earth's rotation by 0.06 microseconds each day, how is China not known for its building integrity?
    3
  9772. These students are all below the legal voting age in Hong Kong, what makes you think their political opinions matter?
    3
  9773.  @ggttuuxx  China should set a better example? What should China do then you tell me? If China does nothing then nothing will change.
    3
  9774.  @mlight6845  you said: "So, you claim that sailing a ship is the same as live fire exercises." Never said that they were the same, but that it is fair. I mean, what message is Australia sending by sailing warships through the Taiwan Strait? China's live fire exercise is our response.
    3
  9775.  @truth3505  The Western Dragon embodies the 7 deadly sins of Christianity. In the West, the typical dragon is a mythical creature that's arrogant (pride), yet envious of others (envy), demands virgin sacrifices (lust), breathes fire (wrath), devours excessive amounts of livestock (gluttony) and is often depicted sleeping (sloth) on a hoard of gold (greed). In fairy tales, it's a knight that defeats the dragon and symbolises a Christian's triumph over the 7 deadly sins. The Eastern/Chinese dragon🐉 is a different mythical creature from the Western dragon. In Chinese culture, dragons represent power, strength and good fortune, often symbolizing the Emperor's divine right to rule and of worthiness and competence. In Chinese culture, excellent and outstanding people are compared to a dragon, so it's a more positive perception of dragons in Chinese culture, distinct from the negative perception of Western dragons.
    3
  9776. @Pub Comrad In the past, China was a dirt-poor country, and suffering from population problems like high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, low literacy rates, and so on. Why allow families in China to raise multiple kids only for there to have not enough food, not enough schools to send them to and not enough hospitals to provide adequate healthcare? Why not focus all available resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood and get him into a good school? That's why China's One-Child Policy was conceived. According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. And its thanks to One-Child Policy that China increased literacy rates and lowered poverty rates. Look at India today, and its suffering from high birth rates, high child malnutrition, high child mortality rates, low literacy rates, etc, which were problems that China once suffered from.
    3
  9777.  @edwardr8826  Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule for over 100 years, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were ever held by Hong Kong people while it was British colony. But despite the lack of democracy, Hong Kong flourished under authoritarian British rule and was a global finance hub and busiest port city closest to mainland China. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover to mainland China, did Hong Kong finally get to vote in elections for their favorite leader, and frankly speaking, Hong Kong's economy is suffering because of democracy, since the protests are getting out of hand and investors in Hong Kong are spooked by the instability and Hong Kong's economy is grinding to a halt because of the protest. So why should mainland China follow Hong Kong's example? Hong Kong progressed under authoritarian British Colonial rule
    3
  9778.  @edwardr8826  South Korea experienced massive economic growth under the South Korean dictator Park Chung Hee. When Park came to power in 1961, South Korea's per capita income was only US$72.00 (poorer than some Sub-Saharan African countries) and North Korea was the greater economic and military power on the peninsula. One of Park's main goals was to end the poverty of South Korea, and lift the country up from being a Third World economy to a First World economy via etatist methods. Park is credited with playing a pivotal role in the development of South Korea's tiger economy by shifting its focus to export-oriented industrialisation, resulting in rapid economic growth and industrialization in South Korea, and this was known as the Miracle on the Han River (한강의 기적) However, he became increasingly dictatorial later and declared martial law and amended the constitution into a highly authoritarian document called the Yushin Constitution (effectively abolishing the former constitution) and granting him dictatorial powers. Park is a controversial figure in modern South Korean political discourse and among the South Korean populace in general for his dictatorship and undemocratic ways. While some credit him for sustaining the Miracle on the Han River, which reshaped and modernized South Korea, others criticize his authoritarian way of ruling the country (especially after 1971) and for prioritizing economic growth and contrived social order at the expense of civil liberties. So what can China learn from South Korea? Its economic growth occurred under South Korean dictatorship.
    3
  9779.  @edwardr8826  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party Kuomintang rule for more than half its life! For decades, KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and KMT leader Chiang kai-shek was dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and declared Martial Law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan rapidly modernized and flourished in what's known as Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹) Between 1952 and 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 and 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan's GDP grew by 360% between 1965 and 1986 and the percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 and 1986. And it all occurred under authoritarian KMT rule. Only when democracy was introduced to Taiwan (because the USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan if KMT did not introduce political reforms) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest in the 1990s. Today, Taiwan's economy is in a slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, and graduates in Taiwan are unable to find jobs locally, so many seek employment opportunities abroad, such as in mainland China or in Singapore. So why should China follow Taiwan's democratization? Taiwan's economy was flourishing under authoritarian KMT rule, so why change to democracy? Because Westerners says so? Why fix something that's not broken?
    3
  9780.  @edwardr8826  Japan's industrialization occurred much earlier than its Asian neighbors. Japan first began seriously modernizing back during Meiji Restoration era, under the authoritarian rule of Japanese Emperor Meiji (whom the period was named after him). During this period, Japan abolished the Shogunate (thus restoring imperial rule to the emperor) and also got rid of the Samurai class (which represented a drain on Japan's resources) but the dissatisfied samurai rebelled and resulted in a civil war, culminating in wiping out the last samurai (The movie featuring Tom Cruise was based on this) The Meiji Restoration accelerated industrialization in Japan, which led to its rise as a military power by the year 1895, under the slogan of "Enrich the country, strengthen the military" (富国強兵 fukoku kyōhei). This was why Japan waged war with Korea and a weakened China, because it had grown powerful enough to challenge other countries. Therefore, Japan's economic growth was not due to democracy. Japan had already industrialized much earlier, and it was under authoritarian Japanese imperial rule that put Japan on the world map as an industrial power. While Imperial Japan did lost WWII and later became a democracy, it was not democracy that led to Japan's economic rise. It was authoritarian imperial rule under Japanese Emperor Meiji.
    3
  9781.  @edwardr8826  North Korea was actually initially successful as a dictatorship and it was the greater economic and military power on the peninsula due to the North's history of heavy industries such as the power and chemical plants, while South Korea was dirt-poor with GDP lower than some Sub-Saharan African countries. The reason why North Korea is doing badly today, is because the USA declared war against North Korea and slap crippling sanctions on DPRK to stymied its growth. No peace treaty was ever signed after Korean War, so American companies can't set up shop in Pyongyang and develop its economy. China wants to do more business with DPRK and open up its economy to rest of the world, but we can't do much with the US sanctions against N. Korea in place. In 2016, it was revealed that North Korea approached the United States about conducting formal peace talks to formally end the war, but Washington rejected this plan. So North Korea is kept poor because it is still currently at war with USA, and few investors are attracted to do business in a country still at war with USA.
    3
  9782. Young talents must be nurtured at a young age. If the French or English speaking countries don't want this young Cambodian prodigy, then Chinese government will gladly nurture him and sponsor his education in China.
    3
  9783.  @yaoliang1580  Corruption does exist in Singapore, look at the recent case with their transport minister Iswaran.
    3
  9784.  @KlKl-k4x  "Shenzhou. The US 7th Fleet is based in Yokosuka, Japan. " My bad, it's actually Task Force 73 of the US 7th Fleet that's based in Singapore. Unlike other overseas US military bases, there is no official US "Naval Base" in Singapore but is rather ambiguously called a military "place" – largely due to political reasons such Singapore's status as a neutral country. But it doesn't disguise the fact that Singapore is a US ally through and through.
    3
  9785. Plastic bags are used for about a day, but they take over 1000 years to decompose, so those plastic bags will probably outlast even you and me.
    3
  9786.  @MarkYeung1  You said "but also accepted money from them." How much money did they accepted from the CPC?
    3
  9787.  @MarkYeung1  "Look at Japan, look at South Korea, look at Taiwan. They preserve their cultures while modernizing." They've all been westernized politically, and their people have been taught to believe that all countries must become Western-style democracies in order to be considered successful. However if you look at the histories of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan Island, they've all modernized under single party authoritarian rule, not while under Western style democracy. For example, Taiwan's modernization occurred under authoritarian single-party rule. For decades, the Kuomintang (KMT) ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, and imposed martial law for 38 years (which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time). Political dissenters in Taiwan were imprisoned or killed by the KMT during this period in Taiwan known as White Terror (白色恐怖) Yet under authoritarian KMT rule, Taiwan rapidly modernized and its economy flourished, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7% between 1952 and 1982, and 6.9% between 1983 and 1986. Taiwan's GDP grew by 360% between 1965 and1986, and the percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries. So the fact is that Taiwan's modernization occurred largely under authoritarian rule, not Western style democracy as often perceived.
    3
  9788.  @MarkYeung1  Japan's modernization also occurred under authoritarian rule. Japan's modernization first began during the Meiji Restoration (明治維新) under the authoritarian rule of the Japanese Emperor Meiji (of which the period is named after him). Emperor Meiji abolished the Shogunate and restored Imperial rule to Japan, and he also abolished the Samurai class, facing fierce resistance from the remaining Samurais and he also introduced industrial processes to Japan which made Imperial Japan arguably the strongest country in Asia at the start of WWI. In short, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan Island all modernized under authoritarian rule of Emperor Meiji (Japan), Park Chung-hee (South Korea) and KMT (Taiwan) respectively. Yet their people are often under the perception that its "Western-style democracy" that brought about their modernization when it's not true. And they've been westernized to think that all countries must adopt Western-style democracy in order to be considered successful, but their histories show that this is not the case. That's what mainland China means by "modernization doesn't equate Westernization". China has found a political system that works best for China, so China sees no need to abandon this system and adopt Western style democracy in order to be considered "successful" in the eyes of others.
    3
  9789.  @MarkYeung1  It's because some people from former colonies (i.e Hong Kong, The Philippines, etc) have been politically captured by the West into thinking that every state must adopt Western style democracy in order to be considered successful. Such people view everything through a Western Lens instead of an Asian Lens (or the region where they are from), because their minds have been "colonized" and remain so, long after the colonizers have left their lands. Yet many of these people with colonial mentality, don't even realize that their views and way of thinking have been coloured by Western Lens. Colonial mentality is just like "Pinkerton Syndrome" which is the perceived tendency of some Asians to regard white people as "superior" or "more desirable", and it has been taken to the extreme to include political systems as well. Unless these people free themselves from their mental emancipation, their minds will remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters.
    3
  9790.  @MarkYeung1  How is Canadian government buying enough Covid-19 vaccines for 5x it's population protecting the people of Canada? It's only prolonging the pandemic because the developing countries are unable to obtain vaccines for themselves. 1 Canadian having access to 5 Covid-19 vaccines, while elsewhere in the world, 10 Africans have to fight for access to 1 Covid-19 vaccine is not protecting the people of Canada, it's only making the pandemic last longer.
    3
  9791.  @MarkYeung1  Who said that Chinese government doesn't allow YouTube to operate in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    3
  9792.  @isaacvitela5131  Experts have long debunked the so-called Chinese "debt-trap" as a myth. The narrative wrongfully portrays both Beijing and the developing countries it deals with. Our research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country, much less the port of Hambantota. A Chinese company’s acquisition of a majority stake in the port was a cautionary tale, but it’s not the one we’ve often heard. ... Source: The Atlantic: There is No Chinese Debt Trap
    3
  9793.  @7coyotl772  You said: "They haven't finished any projects in Africa" Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway Source: YouTube: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, compared to what Westerners have been doing in Africa for centuries.
    3
  9794. It turns out that those apartments in Shanghai Zhangjiang district were low-cost apartments provided by the government to the tenants. In the agreement, the government has the right to seize back those property in times of emergency (with proper compensation given to tenants) and the tenants signed the agreement knowingly. The government offered 2-3 months compensation to those affected, but some of them demanded up to half a year's compensation which the government did not agree.
    3
  9795.  @Rasyad95  In Indonesia, all citizens must undertake twelve years of compulsory education which consists of six years at elementary level and three each at middle and high school levels. Are you even Indonesian yourself if you don't even know your own country's laws? Yet you're complaining about China forcing them to learn when Indonesia does that as well?
    3
  9796.  @Sean-giang  North Korea and South Korea may have their own policies, but as I've mentioned above, PRC and ROC both agree to the 1992 Consensus that there is only One China and that Taiwan is part of China (as the US acknowledged with the 1972 Shanghai Communique), which part of this do you not understand? China is nothing like the two Koreas, you're comparing apples to oranges here.
    3
  9797. The reason why China is able to effectively control the coronavirus situation (where many Western countries are failing badly) is thanks to the collective efforts of the government and the people. 长苦不如短苦 It's better to suffer short-term than suffer long-term.
    3
  9798.  Molly Wop Chainsaw  The USA won't use nukes, because they are facing off against another nuclear power, China, just like during Cold War with Soviet Union, there were no nukes fired against each other.
    3
  9799. Good News, Gonzalo Lira is alive and well. Video:youtu.be/R2yeSOcNlgE
    3
  9800. That's the same with American democracy, it's all 1 man, 1 vote. No matter how smart and politically savvy you are, you get 1 vote, and all the ignorant people too get to vote in political decision-making that will impact the country's future.
    3
  9801. It's the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (phobia of the West being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Sinophobia in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown accustomed to Western dominance, such that the thought of a rising China frightens them so.
    3
  9802. @反共 在中国五千年历史有没有自由民主的时代？那为什么中国偏偏要选自由民主？中国五千年历史从来没有自由民主。
    3
  9803. @反共 我说中国五千年历史哪里有自由民主？中国历史从来没有自由民主，你到底在说什么？
    3
  9804.  @everythingandmore5537  I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    3
  9805. @反共 君主制是政府的专制形式，与自由民主制不同。 我看全球历史上的大多数都是威权主义的，而不是自由民主的。 看，甚至罗马帝国也崩溃了。
    3
  9806.  Appu  If Cyrus' message of building bridges between China and the West, is the same as the CPC's message, then what's wrong with promoting such a message?
    3
  9807.  @Shayne411  It's the result of White Supremacists Boosted by YouTube to Spread Asian Hate (a video about SerpentZA, Laowhy86, ADV) youtu.be/dHAO080lQUY
    3
  9808. When China was 3rd world, we suffered from 3rd world problems. Likewise, now China is 1st world, so naturally we suffer from 1st world problems too.
    3
  9809. @Red Disaster There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    3
  9810. Japan is still bound by 1945 WW2 surrender treaty, to only maintain a self-defense army, even after 70 years. Imagine another 70 years into the future, and Chinese military continues to grow more powerful, whereas Japan military is still "stuck" like it is 70 years ago. Even Germany is not bound by such WW2 surrender treaty, and can grow its army as large as it wants.
    3
  9811. "If data were petroleum in the artificial intelligence era, then China would be Saudi Arabia." - Lee Kai-fu, Venture Capitalist.
    3
  9812.  @hindugoat2302  What CPC aggression? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, isn't it the United States that's the real threat to global peace and stability here?
    3
  9813.  @MarkYeung1  What about the US wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Syria, and so on? If anything, it's apparent that the U.S is a real threat to global peace and security here.
    3
  9814.  @treks6486  Let's analyse the Marxist slogan to better understand it. The first verse: "From each other according to his ability" what it means is that capable people should contribute their best to society and that the sick, old, infirm, shouldn't have to contribute as much. The second verse is "to each according to his needs." and what this means is that people who need more, get more. The sick, old and infirm often have greater needs than ordinary working people, so what Marx is saying is that such people should be afforded what they need. At least, this is my interpretation of that Marxist slogan. Capitalism doesn't care about the welfare old, the sick and infirm, such people are often perceived as liabilities that have outlived their usefulness. It's actually socialism that care about the old, sick and infirm and that's why socialist policies have been implemented in many capitalist countries, yet such countries are oftentimes reluctant to label themselves as a socialist country. It's because of this stigmatisation against socialism/communism in many Western countries.
    3
  9815.  @MarkYeung1  "CGTN is not popular in Hong Kong. Do you know why?" Many Hong Kong people (but not all) are still suffering from the mental damage inflicted by colonizers on the mindset of the colonized. Even though the British have since decolonized from Hong Kong after 1997, "decolonization of the mind" takes a longer time to heal, since many Hong Kong people (but not all) suffer from the colonial mindset as a result of British colonization.
    3
  9816.  Dennis Chu  Consumerism in America pushes Americans to spend, spend, spend. That benefits corporations (AKA the shareholders) and keeps Americans broke. Video: Consumerism in America: You're All Brainwashed youtu.be/lRDrFsjOPoI Whereas Chinese culture is about saving money and being frugal. That's one reason why the US-China trade deficit exists.
    3
  9817. Tiangong-1 was launched in 2011, with only expected operational lifespan of 2 years. Its already 2018 and the spacestation has long been decommissioned and reentry to Earth is the natural conclusion at the end of its service.
    3
  9818. It's no secret that the United States is in decline and China is rising. Many experts predict that China's economy is expected to overtake the United States someday in the foreseeable future. But since the 19th century, many have grown so thoroughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, such that the very thought of a non-Western country like China eventually overtaking the USA in the future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    3
  9819. If Wuhan can recover, then other cities can draw inspiration on how to contain the virus.
    3
  9820. Justin Watson If the USA is so militarily advanced, then why did it lose the Vietnam War? Why did USA not defeat North Korea during the Korean War? Even during modern times, USA is still fighting wars in Middle East such as Afghan War, Iraq War, Libyan War, spanning 15 years with no end in sight? Why not America crush its enemies hands down like Shar L said, instead of prolonging the war for so long?
    3
  9821.  @richard35791  China seeks allies like the Philippines, but China will not do so at expense to our sovereign territory. The Spratly Islands were not part of the Philippines (as per the 1898 Treaty of Paris) then why should China give up our claims to the Spratly islands?
    3
  9822.  @zeroneo8432  The problem in Taiwan is that the U.S acknowledges One China principle that the island is a part of China. Yet the U.S House Speaker representative choose to visit the island in violation of this principle.
    3
  9823.  @Todd-rk2lb  Look up the Sierra Madre. It's a rusty ship that Phillipines parked in the Second Thomas Shoal in order to stake its claim. Instead accepting Chinese help in repairing the vessel, the Philippines continues to send supply ships to reinforce the decaying hull of the grounded vessel.
    3
  9824.  @TianZhaoHeavenlyFortune  Remember when I said: "I know of at least one Hong Kong Chinese that moved to Canada, that still retains such a mindset."? Well, mark yeung is the guy that I'm referring to.
    3
  9825. The left hand don't know what the right side is doing, and the brain doesn't even work.
    3
  9826.  @niyarao2962  The patient is still brainwashed by Western media and think they are fine.
    3
  9827.  Priya Jaya  You Indians love Chinese products like smartphones such as Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, etc. Xiaomi was started in 2010. Today it's one of the world's most popular smartphones. In India, it's number one. Video: How Xiaomi broke out of China to go global | CNBC Reports youtu.be/291DlKa7iIU
    3
  9828.  @niyarao2962  Here's a list of Top 10 Most Popular Smartphone Companies in India. More than half are Chinese brands. Top 10 Most Popular Smartphone Companies in India 1. Samsung (South Korean) 2. Xiaomi (Chinese) 3. OnePlus (Chinese) 4. Apple (American) 5. Vivo (Chinese) 6. Oppo (Chinese) 7. Lenovo (Chinese) 8. LG (South Korean) 9. Nokia (Finnish) 10. HTC (Chinese) ... Source: Top 10 Most Popular Smartphone Companies in India walkthroughindia.com/hot-trends/top-10-most-popular-smartphone-companies-in-india/
    3
  9829. AdamosDad How to pick up sushi with a fork? Stabbing it or scooping it usually results in the sushi unraveling before reaching the mouth. With chopsticks, its so much easier...
    3
  9830.  @chrishamlin5863  Yes, it inspired the phrase "quiet qutting" which became popular in the United States in 2022.
    3
  9831.  @84jordie  You may be Malaysian Chinese, and while you personally don't use Weibo (it's your preference) but that doesn't automatically mean Chinese in Singapore, Malaysia, Australia (and other parts of the world) don't use Weibo for that matter. Instead of Facebook, Google and YouTube, China have our own equivalent websites like Weibo, Baidu, Youku, Bilibili, etc, to fill in the same niche role in China. Most mainland Chinese English standard not very proficient, so many prefer our own Chinese language Websites over English language (once again, this is personal preference) so many Chinese netizen stick to our websites. Furthermore, many foreign companies are enticed to set up shop in China (to tap into the Chinese market) and doing so requires using Chinese websites like Baidu (since Google is blocked) so this denys Google profits from China and also generate revenue for our local companies. Also, if companies want to reach out to a wider Chinese audience, then it pays to create Weibo or Youku account to promote business in China. So this is the basis of China's strategy then. Attract foreign businesses to use Chinese services while in China.
    3
  9832.  @84jordie  Weibo may be saturated for market within China. But that does not necessarily mean that it will forever be in China. Chinese companies may first start out small, but once they gotten stronger and more confident in China, they may choose to expand overseas and into foreign markets. Weibo may not have reached that stage yet, but other Chinese companies like Huawei, Lenovo, Xiaomi, Oppo, ZTE, TLC Communications, etc have made the move to expand to global markets outside China. For example, here are the top 10 smartphone company brands in 2018. 1. Samsung (South Korean) 2. Apple (American) 3. Huawei (Chinese) 4. Oppo (Chinese) 5. Xiaomi (Chinese) 6. LENOVO (Chinese) 7. LG (South Korean) 8. TCL Communication 9. ZTE (Chinese) 10. Micromax (Indian) Source: Top 10 Smartphone Brands in the World techzac.com/top-10-smartphone-manufacturers-in-the-world/ Do you have evidence that Mandarin Chinese is not the most read and most written language like you are claimin? And what difference does using typing using Pinyin or Voice input make? Mobile phones and other devices are progressing to Voice Input, where people can simply speak directly to the device instead of typing, so does your point really matter here? I mean, what point are you trying to make with your last statement? I am using YouTube of course, but that's only because we are having this conversation here of course.
    3
  9833. If you don't want Chinese vaccine, then it's your funeral. China can always offer our vaccines to other developing countries that desperately need the vaccine.
    3
  9834.  @everythingandmore5537  "神州 Shenzhou The CCP prevented the who experts to come in January 2020." Because the situation in Wuhan wasn't stable in Jan 2020, that's why Wuhan was under lockdown, so why send WHO experts while the house is still on fire? You don't investigate the cause of the fire, while the house is still burning, you put out the fire first. And right now, Western democracies are burning, yet they still want to point fingers instead of putting out the fire?
    3
  9835.  @everythingandmore5537  So what would have happened had word of Covid-19 spreading gotten out? More people in Wuhan would panic and fled Wuhan, spreading the infection throughout rest of China and worldwide, so didn't China do the right thing here to limit the spread?
    3
  9836.  @everythingandmore5537  China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. But how deadly was it? How transmissible was it? How was it transmitted? All these information doesn't magically appear out of thin air, there needed to be tests and experiments done to gleam this info. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. And what if it was a false alarm, and it was a mistaken virus? You're just pointing fingers and blaming China for Western democracies inept ability to handle the Covid-19 situation in their lands.
    3
  9837.  @everythingandmore5537  But of China banned all flights out of China, then how would the WHO experts get to China when China is under lockdown? And how would they report their findings if they aren't allowed to fly out of China? What would the report even serve, when the pandemic is raging out of control in Western democracies?
    3
  9838.  @everythingandmore5537  Even if China locks down, there is no guarantee that Western democracies will be prepared to handle the Covid-19 situation in their lands. Even today, many Western democracies refuse to lockdown, or they only lockdown 5 days that's all, a half-baked lockdown.
    3
  9839.  @everythingandmore5537  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    3
  9840.  @everythingandmore5537  How do you mobilise the all best WHO doctors in just 1 day and send them to China? And quarantine takes 2 weeks, what's the point sending the investigation team to Wuhan, while the house is on fire? Isn't it better to put out the fire first then investigate the possible origins once the situation is under control? And you're saying flying into China but not out, well which WHO doctor is willing to go on a one-way triple to China?
    3
  9841.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "President Xi knows that public order, under the auspicies of the CPC, is more important than economic growth." Of course. China's top priority has always been of public order and social stability first, above all else. Without public order, there can be no economic growth in China. Without social stability, there can be no progress for China. Even past Chinese dynasties prioritize restoring order first before implementing any new policies.
    3
  9842.  @bartonlee3594  Hong Kong's issue was that housing prices are through the roof. Young Hong Kong couples find it difficult to apply for housing and settle down, because the Hong Kong property tycoons are able to jack up property prices with impunity. Because Hong Kong is a tax haven for corporations. The Hong Kong government receives little revenue from taxing corporation, so they instead rely on taxing land sales for revenue. Thus, they turn a blind eye to rising house prices (since they will gain more revenue this way), much to the chagrin of Hong Kong youth looking to buy houses. One result of the National Security Law is that Hong Kong housing prices dropped, hopefully falling within the reach of Hong Kong youth.
    3
  9843.  @MarkYeung1  "Japan's economy is in better shape than China in the next few years." In 2023, Japanese economy grew by 1.6%, while China's grew by 5.2% in 2023.
    3
  9844.  @MarkYeung1  "Currently, 20 million houses are being built but not finished." Because it takes time to finish those houses. You expect houses to be completed instantaneously? "Evergrande alone has 800000 unfinished houses and is in bankruptcy." Companies may come and go. Another company might take over those unfinished houses and complete them.
    3
  9845.  @MarkYeung1  "Certainly, it doesn't account for people purchasing their houses without receiving it." China has one of the world's highest home ownership with more than 90% of households owning homes (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations (Huang et al., 2020). Whereas Japan has home ownership rate of just 61.2%. Home ownership rate in Hong Kong is even worst at just 51.5%.
    3
  9846.  @MarkYeung1  The allocation of household wealth in China looks a little like this: 46% bank deposits, 39% housing, and 10-15% in financial assets, including stocks, so it's certainly not due to a lack of alternative investment opportunities. Chinese investors just tend to have a strong preference for putting their money in housing that's all.
    3
  9847.  @MarkYeung1  This is made possible because of the fact that owning property there isn't a continuous financial drain. There are no yearly property taxes -- or they’re so low as to be virtually negligible, as is the case in Shanghai. Generally speaking, you pay all the taxes upon the initial purchase of a home and then don’t have to pay anything significant again until your freehold lease runs out (which is up to 70 years away). So this has created a very friendly environment for the people of China to park their long term savings in housing.
    3
  9848.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "But with many PURCHASED homes, they are incompleted and unlivable." Houses will not sprout legs and run away you know. Houses have substance, and even if the construction company go bust, another company will eventually pick up from where the construction left off. Investing in housing is not like investing in stocks and shares, where the money can just evaporate if the stock market crash.
    3
  9849.  @MarkYeung1  "Hope that one day, Shenzhou and his colonial mindset will understand what the Chinese people are going through right now." You don't even understand the concept of colonial mentality, yet you just apply it randomly to anyone. Explain how do I have the colonial mentality? Colonial mentality is the internalized perception of ethnic or cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization. It corresponds with the belief that the cultural values of the colonizer are inherently superior to one's own. For example, some Hong Kongers just think "freedom, democracy and voting" will somehow solve all their problems, when the fact is that Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy for 150 years as a British colony.
    3
  9850.  @MarkYeung1  I believe it's preferable to living in Hong Kong, where the home ownership rate is just 51.5%, compared to mainland China's 90% home ownership rate. Even Japan's home ownership rate is just 61.2%
    3
  9851.  @MarkYeung1  Japan has a housing problem. Surging Tokyo property prices has made Tokyo the second most unaffordable city worldwide, only behind Hong Kong, according to a UBS global real estate report.
    3
  9852.  @MarkYeung1  Average income may be higher, but the cost of living in China is (generally) lower than the cost of living in Hong Kong and especially Japan. Food is cheap in China. Electricity, gas and water are also affordable. Transportation is cheap, train fares are cheap and rental bikes are readily available for people to save money on transport. Whereas the cost of living in Hong Kong is higher so even with higher income, they don't have as much to spend. Cost of living in Japan is especially high. And the fact remains that Japan's home ownership rate is just 61.2% and Hong Kong's is just 51.5%, whereas in mainland China, it's over 90%.
    3
  9853.  @MarkYeung1  Firstly, the Chinese government doesn't force people to buy houses. There are other investment options available like bank deposits and stock market. Like I said earlier, China's household wealth looks a little like this: 46% bank deposits, 39% housing, and 10-15% in financial assets, including stocks. Secondly, Chinese households are clearly able to afford down payments for an apartment, that's why they bought them. Owning property in China isn't a continuous financial drain, since there are no yearly property taxes. All the taxes are paid upfront on the initial purchase and then you don't have to pay anything significant again until the time to renew the land lease.
    3
  9854.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Really feel for the "homeowners" who paid so much and get nothing essentially." Who said they get nothing? Houses are tangible assets, even if unfinished. If you investing in stock market and the investment goes bad, then of course you'll end up with nothing. Construction companies can go bust, but a house will not sprout legs and run away, even if it's unfinished. There are no shortage of other construction companies to pick up where the bankrupt company left off. In fact, Chinese government is assigning state-own companies to resume the construction of those unfinished housing projects. Who said the homeowners get nothing? And the fact remains that Japan's home ownership rate is just 61.2% and Hong Kong's is just 51.5%, whereas in mainland China, it's over 90%.
    3
  9855. General Neck Beard Can you tell me in which book does it say that using Facebook, YouTube, etc is illegal in China?
    3
  9856.  @jaggirl  It's apparent that Cyrus Janssen had previously published his video entitled "Americans Don't Know The Truth About China" and it was CGTN that approached Cyrus to ask for permission to publish HIS video on their website. So the premise that Cyrus is somehow being paid to make propaganda for CGTN is already wrong, let alone the fact that Cyrus didn't follow through with any payment from CGTN.
    3
  9857. Surprisingly, Brian Berletic of The New Atlas was one such person that kept claiming Anwar was paid off by the NED.
    3
  9858.  @valfanclub  Same here, I hope Beijing and doesn't get suckered into an unnecessary war with Washington over Taipei. And I hope that more people in Taiwan realize that the U.S doesn't care about the island, as long as they can use it as a chess piece to contain the mainland's rise.
    3
  9859.  @theangrycanuck8331  But it's the votes of the ordinary Americans that brought the US government into power.
    3
  9860.  @item6931  You said: "Yes that's what I said. So your argument is" Actually, that's what I said, not you. This is what you said: "False. The article is not saying that native Taiwanese are descended from Han," but when did I ever said that Taiwanese native aboriginals are descended from Han? Could you point out where did I said that previously?
    3
  9861.  @John2r1  You said: "China's Mainland government is the CCP not CPC. " If we look up the name of the party in Chinese, it's Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where Zhōngguó (中国) means China (i.e "Middle Kingdom"), so the correct name of the party is the CPC, not CCP.
    3
  9862.  @John2r1  You said: "That is the reality the other nations are to chicken s**t to risk a war with China. The US may have the military might but the US government politicians lack the backbone to stand up to China so they keep playing this game over Taiwan." Congratulations, once again you've just reinforced that fact that mainland China exerts authority over Taiwan's sovereignty, and that other nations have recognized this and acceded to the One China policy. Even the 1972 Shanghai Communique, the US formally acknowledged that "all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China".
    3
  9863.  @John2r1  "神州 Shenzhou However they are commonly called the CCP or Chinese Communists Party. That's the English translation as it's become common." But it's incorrect. The party's name literally has the word China (i.e Zhōngguó 中国) in it, so it should be called the Communist Party of China. Just like in English, nobody calls the United States of America as the American United States.
    3
  9864.  @item6931  You said: "Then even that it false, because you make the implicit assumption that China is the CCP." How is that false, when even Taiwan's own constitution says that the island is part of China? Also, in 1971 the UN voted to recognize People's Republic of China as "China" and to kick Taiwan out of the UN Security Council. Resolution 2758 was passed in response to Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The voting results were: -76 voted for, -35 voted against -17 abstained ... Source: Wikipedia: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 Since PRC won the vote with two-thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971 and recognized the People's Republic of China as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" from the United Nations. In other words, the UN voted democratically to recognize China as CPC.
    3
  9865.  @kevinj12345  On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia... The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position. ... Taken from a 2017 The Diplomat article about the Shanghai Communique
    3
  9866.  @item6931  You said: "The CCP is an illegitimate usurper...Therefore it is more accurate to say that Taiwan is the True China" The Kuomintang (Guomindang) came to power by rebelling against Qing Dynasty China so aren't they usurpers as well? Yet why do you consider the KMT to be the true China while CPC isn't? During the Chinese Civil War, the KMT had massive wealth, superior equipment and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan island. Then why should Taiwan be the true China?
    3
  9867.  @John2r1  You said: "Due to Taiwan being inhabited before China was a organized nation." You're talking about the native Taiwanese aborigines right? But according to Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan, the current Taiwanese aborigines are descended from farmers from mainland China that arrived on the island around 5,000 years ago, which is around the same time as the start of China's 5,000 years of history. Around 5,000 years ago, farmers from the southeast Chinese coast settled on the island. These people are believed to have been speakers of Austronesian languages, which dispersed from Taiwan across the islands of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The current Taiwanese aborigines are believed to be their descendants. ... Source: Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan
    3
  9868.  @John2r1  You said: The Qing Dynasty existed from (1636–1912). Taiwan was annexed in 1683 by the Qing dynasty. There is a major difference between annexation and simply owning the island from the beginning of the Qing dynasty. Hawaii was not originally part of founding of the United States of America, but it was annexed later. Nevertheless, Hawaii is considered as part of the USA, despite not being part of the founding of the USA.
    3
  9869.  @item6931  You said: "They let the KMT weaken by letting them do most of the fighting against Japan while gathering their strength to attack the KMT" When Imperial Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931, the KMT leader Chiang kai-Shek was reluctant to repel the invaders, instead he continued purging communists (our fellow Chinese brethren). So much until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap Chiang and get him to ally with the communists, in what's known as the Xi'an Incident. Source: Wikipedia: Xi'an Incident Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was thanks to communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release, that Chiang finally agreed to form a united front with the communists to repel the Japanese.
    3
  9870.  @kevinj12345  I've read the actual text, and it clearly shows that the United States acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China. So that means the people of Taiwan also maintain that the island is part of China, and that the US doesn't challenge this position, so where does it not show that US recognizes mainland China's dominance over Taiwan?
    3
  9871.  @kevinj12345  You said: "A peace that the CCP (or CPC) doesn't seem interested in keeping anymore." It all began with the United States House of Representatives speaker visiting Taiwan in violation of the One China policy. Even the US hosted the Taiwan President recently so China is simply reacting to any attempts by the US to change the status quo in the Taiwan Strait.
    3
  9872.  @John2r1  "Something I know very well is that the US government doesn't get involved unless there is something of value to the US in a given region. For Taiwan this is the microprocessor industry." The US is making plans to transfer Taiwan's chip maker TSMC's wafer fabrication plants to Arizona. Once the transfer is complete, then Taiwan will no longer be of any interest to the US, since the microprocessor tech is now in the US, so what makes you think the US will get involved if conflict breaks out in the Taiwan Strait?
    3
  9873.  @kevinj12345  "神州 Shenzhou and those Chinese are descended from Arabia. The Taiwanese are Arabic not Chinese ya dork" I've merely pointed out that the current Taiwan arborigines were descended from farmers that left mainland China some 5,000 years ago, which coincides with China's 5,000 years of history. Also during the Qing Dynasty (of which Taiwan was part of) the Manchu government defined China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejected the idea that "China" only meant Han areas. So whether you are Han or not, Taiwan was part of China regardless, because China is a multi-ethnic state, not just Han Chinese alone.
    3
  9874.  @kevinj12345  "I do wonder how hard you had to submit to the CCP to earn your credit score or which CCP branch you are currently conducting propaganda under?" So I take it that you're unable to refute my previous points, so you start resorting to hurling ad hominen insults against me for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    3
  9875.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou Distanced itself from Wolf Warrior Lu's remarks?" On the other hand, Washington has never distanced itself from remarks made by Wolf Warrior Jake Sullivan, Anthony Blinken or John Kirby's scathing remarks about Taiwan, even though the U.S acknowledges the One China principle that the island is part of China.
    3
  9876.  @bartonlee3594  "Hard to disagree with you without international law complex." The United States does not even ratify UNCLOS, and yet the US is carrying out so-called "freedom of navigation" operations in the name of UNCLOS?
    3
  9877.  @bartonlee3594  "Too bad Russia invaded and caused all the problems in the first place." Putin had voiced concerns over NATO's eastward expansion, right up to Russia's doorstep. But his words had fallen on deaf ears in the West, which is why Putin decided to act instead. Yet you're claiming that Russia caused all the problems in the first place?
    3
  9878.  @khangnguyenthaiduy9129  Sri Lanka's Hambantota port is leased to Chinese companies to develop for 99 years. Once the lease expires, the port would be returned back to Sri Lanka, so Sri Lanka stands to benefit in the long run.
    3
  9879.  @bartonlee3594  The thing about prisons in the U.S is that even though ex-convicts are released, some of them are unable to find a proper job, so they tend to return to a life of crime and wound up behind bars once again. Because to some of them, life behind bars is "better" that life outside bars. Furthermore, many U.S prison systems are privatized, meaning that these private companies have an incentive to "catch" more criminals for higher profits.
    3
  9880.  @michaelkatz275  The figure of 1 million Uighurs in alleged concentration camps is enormous. One million is almost the population size of Manhattan in New York, yet you're saying that this number of Uighurs are in alleged concentration camps in Xinjiang? How much resources do you think is necessary to maintain such a huge concentration camp population of one million?
    3
  9881.  @jonathanhe7676  Mongolia has an Independence Day, but Taiwan doesn't.
    3
  9882.  @jonathanhe7676  "Mongolia became a country, why can’t Taiwan?" So if Taiwan is an independent country, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there something controlling Taiwan and preventing them from joining the UN?
    3
  9883.  @jonathanhe7676  "神州 Shenzhou Yes, because of Taiwan declares independence China is going to risk nuclear war over it" Congratulations, you've just proven that Taiwan isn't independent since there is something controlling Taiwan and preventing them from declaring independence.
    3
  9884. (From Matrix) Agent Smith: When i tried to classify your species, I realized your not actually mammals. Mammals develop equilibrium with nature, but you humans move to an area and multiply and multiply until every natural resource is consumed and spread to another area. There is another organism that follows this pattern... a virus.
    3
  9885.  @alfredyap14  Agreed, it's sad what has happened to the US. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the USA today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    3
  9886.  @ukchatman4920  The decision to abolish the term limits on the presidency was put to a vote, in which only two delegates voted against and three abstained, out of 2,964 votes. Also, there are Western democracies whose leaders have no term limits, such as Australia, Canada, Germany and New Zealand.
    3
  9887.  @abbotsful  fāshēng guānxì "发生关系" means "Have a relationship" that's the meaning of guanxi, it doesn't necessarily mean sexual assault. And from Peng Shuai's post on Reddit, it is apparent that she has had a tumultuous, on-and-off relation with an much older man for several years earlier, but there is clearly no allegation of sexual assault. That's why Peng Shuai wrote an email to WTA saying that the allegations of sexual assault were not true, and she also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    3
  9888.  @yerri5567  You said: "PRC is constantly sending military operations crossing the Taiwan strait into Taiwans side of their ADIZ..." But Taiwan's Air Defense Identification Zone is not recognized airspace, then why can't People's Liberation Army Airforce (PLAAF) fighters fly there? Taiwan's ADIZ literally expands into the mainland airspace, and also if you trace the flight path of those PLAAF jets, they actually flew closer to mainland China than Taiwan island.
    3
  9889.  Dumb & Dumber  Search for Evergrande resuming 95% of it's construction projects.
    3
  9890.  @sara.cbc92  Why are Japanese the good guys, not Chinese mainlanders?
    3
  9891.  @gracesutton1359  Perhaps you've never heard of these terms because Westerners are reluctant to admit that they exist.
    3
  9892.  @setworldafire8171  Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions?
    3
  9893.  @elliekwong3180  Yes, probably around the prewar level is a sweet spot.
    3
  9894.  @infernobat8325  "神州 Shenzhou sanctions take alot of time and luckily for russia it has strong allies and got many resources" It's been more than a year already and the sanctions didn't work, thanks to Russia's strong allies and plentiful resources, then what makes you think they will work in the future? Russia's allies and resources aren't going anywhere.
    3
  9895.  @infernobat8325  "神州 Shenzhou sanctions wont do any damage by day or night" But it's taken more than a year already, and Russia's economy is expected to register growth this year, so what makes you think the sanctions will work?
    3
  9896.  @rolyrodriguez1000  "神州 Shenzhou And by the way many are turning on him because he fails to win a war that he started." The Ukraine conflict hasn't even concluded, yet you're claiming that Putin has failed? Putin still enjoys high approval from Russians so who's turning against him? And Russia had this special military operation because NATO had been expanding eastwards right up to Russia's doorstep.
    3
  9897. Like you said, USA choose to recognized Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. You claim Tibet had de facto independence, but which country recognized Tibet as its own country? Even the League of Nations did not acknowledge Tibet as its own sovereign country and it was recognized as part of China. Today, Tibet is autonomous region of China, as recognized by UN countries like USA, UK, France, Russia, etc, and nobody every brings up the issue of Tibetan sovereignty during all those UN summits and meetings.
    3
  9898. The fact that Joe Biden gave up on his earlier ideals and so easily caved in to mainstream ideals, begs the question: Did Biden truly meant those words he said in 2011? Or was he just catering to popular sentiment at that time?
    3
  9899.  @RockyRover999  "Shenzhou. Can't remember." You specifically said you had to change it every three months, that means you were reminded of its name every 3 months, and now you claim you can't remember the Chinese watch brand that you bought?
    3
  9900.  @billyehh  Nuclear fusion power is a very complex technology, while sodium solid state batteries is much simpler. Several car companies (including Chinese) have made prototype EVs featuring solid/semi solid batteries.
    3
  9901.  @sabinereynaudsf  There are new technology that helps firefighters extinguish electric car fires faster, which is through the use of a fire-fighting blanket made of graphite and a silicon polymer. The fire-fighting blanket also saves time and water.
    3
  9902.  @virginiahunt357  China may be building coal fired power plants for now, but plans to phase them out between 2026 and 2030. Meanwhile, China is already the world's largest producer of renewable green energy like solar power, wind power and hydro power. As the renewable energy technology matures further, China's electrical grid could switch over to renewables in the future.
    3
  9903.  @sabinereynaudsf  China may be building coal fired power plants for now, but plans to phase them out between 2026 and 2030. China is also the world's largest producers of renewable green energy (solar, wind, hydro power) and China's electric grid is slowly making the transition to renewables.
    3
  9904. Good News, Gonzalo Lira is alive and well. Video:youtu.be/R2yeSOcNlgE
    3
  9905.  @MarkYeung1  Taiwan doesn't always welcome Hong Kong people. Taiwan has strict immigration laws regarding people from Hong Kong and many Hong Kongers applying for residency in Taiwan have been left in limbo, especially regarding Hong Kong activists and political exiles.
    3
  9906.  @MarkYeung1  Historical textbooks have taught us that Hong Kong (and also Taiwan) are both part of China and that the people living there should be regarded as part of the same family. Even you subconsciously say that Hong Kong and Taiwan are a part of China.
    3
  9907.  @MarkYeung1  "Hong Kong and Taiwan have always been part of China, and I can't be more clear about it. What are you talking about?" That was my answer in response to your earlier question: "May I know who taught the mainlanders like you to regard the HongKongers as the same family? Thanks." I mean, you can ask any mainlander if they regard the people of Hong Kong or Taiwan as part of the same family, and virtually all of us will say "We are all Chinese" (我们都是中国人). This has been ingrained into the mainland Chinese mindset, but sadly, this feeling is not always reciprocated in by the people of Hong Kong (or Taiwan for that matter) towards mainland Chinese.
    3
  9908.  @MarkYeung1  Mainland China welcomes HongKongers far more than Taiwan island. Mainland China holds the largest number of Hong Kong expatriates at 472,900. This is the largest Hong Kong diaspora outside of Hong Kong itself. More than the number of HongKongers living in Taiwan at just 87,719.
    3
  9909.  @hyc1266  Hong Kongers like mark yeung tend to have the colonial mentality. Colonial mentality is the internalized perception of ethnic or cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization. Such people tend to display a preference for the cultures of Anglo-Saxons, while harboring a disdain for any "non-Anglo" culture, including their own.
    3
  9910.  @biggpicture2930  "so definitely British taught them Meritocracy. And China went to learn from them" Well then, where did Britain learn meritocracy from? The fact remains that meritocracy originated in ancient China in the form of the civil service examinations. Also, as I've previously stated, Singapore is a former British colony, so there are bound to be traces of the colonial mentality. All former colonies be it India, Malaysia, Singapore and even Hong Kong have varying levels of colonial mentality.
    3
  9911.  @biggpicture2930  "You think meritocracy belongs only to ancient China?" Meritocracy clearly originated in ancient China. The earliest example of meritocracy dates back to ancient China back in 600 BC. Throughout the next years, meritocracy probably spread to other parts of the world, including to England where Issac Newton was born in 1643. Mao's Red Guards were the result of communist ideology, not meritocracy.
    3
  9912.  @biggpicture2930  "Sorry @Shenzhou was relentless with his comments on a stale thread and topic ," Relentless? You posted far more comments on that thread than me, mostly consisting of your refusal to accept my answers, as well as hurling insults against me, while repeatedly dismissing India's colonial mentality as rubbish. What defines India and China relations if not the border dispute? The China-India border dispute is caused by India's insistence on maintaining the McMahon Line (drawn by British cartographer, Henry McMahon) while China wants a return to the pre-existing historical boundaries between India and China. So India's insistence on the McMahon Line is a case for colonial mentalism. But you've repeated dismiss colonial mentality as rubbish, without any explanation on your part.
    3
  9913. Nizam Massod In 1958, the Vietnamese PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese, in a diplomatic letter he sent to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. But later that year, Vietnam suddenly change their mind and broke their promise and started claiming those islands as part of its territory. Why Vietnamese politician can suddenly change their mind like that? Vietnamese PM Phạm Văn Đồng diplomatic note to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg
    3
  9914. Actually if you check out cancer rates worldwide ( globalcancermap.com/ ) many Western countries have higher rates compared China.
    3
  9915.  @РудикДудик  From what I understand, there are some women soldiers in the Azov Battalion too, and could easily slip into civilian attire and escape if these soldiers wanted to desert. The Russians are probably aware of this as well, and could possibly come up with more stringent checks to counter this.
    3
  9916. +ravindran ck Actually, many countries have threatened to impose sanctions Chinese goods, or to boycott Chinese goods entirely, but in reality, the demand for cheap goods remains high. Chinese companies are only responding to a demand, so why blame Chinese people when it is other countries that want cheap goods?
    3
  9917. Richie Rodrigues China has been peaceful for 30 years since the last major war in 1979, while USA is still involved in wars In Afghanistan, Iraq, etc, even in 21st century. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States ) So how can you say US government is responsible here? As a democracy USA is still actively engaged in war, while so-called "communist" China is building infrastructure all over the world.
    3
  9918.  @V01DIORE  "Who did starve, what was it, 50 million people?" Those people starved because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Chairman Mao couldn't possibly control the weather, isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong again. "Then go on to create a totalitarian abomination who subverts their own citizens under constant surveillance," Didn't Edward Snowden and Julian Assange of Wikileaks exposed that the U.S spies on its allies and monitor their citizens conversations for keywords relating to terrorism? "the successor to nazi germany who has concentration camps for forced labour and organ harvesting," Guantanamo Bay Detention Center exists, and U.S law permits torture including waterboarding. And you still believe those rumors about Organ Harvesting? Why didn't Obama, Trump or Biden ever bring up organ harvesting to President Xi's face?
    3
  9919.  @V01DIORE  "who debt trap poorer nations and are belligerent to neighbouring countries for imperialist expansionist greed" China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    3
  9920.  @cdb7876  Where's your evidence of Peng Shua's abuse? Peng Shuai had written an email stating that she was resting at home and that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    3
  9921.  @V01DIORE  "who are so corrupt the people make a specialised phrase for their government’s money laundering schemes “tofu dreg" Corruption is a universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are anti-corruption campaigns to crackdown on the mountain of corruption in the communist party. But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of their own? Hilary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his presidential campaign. But after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    3
  9922.  @Lochamp  No reply to the dirty laundry of the United States.
    3
  9923.  @WanderingSword  Wow, I've heard stories from my Chinese friends in USA, but I had no idea it was that bad. It's true that anti-China sentiment affects not just Chinese alone but also other people of Asian descent.
    3
  9924. Given that Meng Wanzhou was eventually released from Canadian custody and returned home safely, I believe one day in the future, Huawei too will be vindicated in the West, and taken off the blacklist.
    3
  9925.  @PomegranateChocolate  "神州 Shenzhou The KMT fought the Japanese." When Imperial Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931, the KMT leader Generalissimo Chiang kai-shek was reluctant to fight the Japanese, instead he continued purging communists (our fellow Chinese) instead of meeting the invaders head on. Until two of his subordinates Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap Chiang in what became known as the Xi'an Incident (西安事变). Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was actually thanks to Communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release. Only then was Chiang willing to ally the KMT with the communists to fight the Japanese, otherwise, the KMT had not been fighting the Japanese like you claimed.
    3
  9926.  @PomegranateChocolate  Chiang kai-Shek even served in the Japanese Army from 1909 to 1911. He purged communists from KMT and their removal of Communists from within the ranks allowed him free reign to give himself what amounted to dictatorial power over much of China. When the Japanese invaded Manchuria, Chiang refused to face the Japanese invaders, until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap him to get him to ally with the communists in a united front against the Japanese. (Xi'an Incident) Additionally, the Communists actually saved his leadership, and it’s often forgotten that without the Communists’ help, Chiang would never have survived as a political force, since was the communists who convinced the officers to release Chiang and allow him to take control of the government once again. Chiang’s efforts against the Japanese gained him some influential friends. And although the Communist General Mao was responsible for much of the damage inflicted upon the Japanese, it was Chiang who got the credit mainly from Britain and the US. When civil war broke out in China, Chiang expected help from the allies, but after a long campaign against both the Japanese and the Germans, the US and Britain were reluctant to get involved in a civil war. His Western ‘friends’ literally abandoned him. He suppressed local culture in Taiwan (White Terror) and was responsible for the imprisonment of 140,000 Taiwanese. These people were taken captive for their alleged opposition to the KMT. At this time, anyone openly criticizing the ruling party was deemed a Communist sympathizer. He held the Taiwan presidency for 25 years. He held the Taiwan under a permanent state of martial law, thus ensuring his power was absolute. In fact, the constitution only allowed for two terms in power, but with martial law as his excuse, Chiang could rule indefinitely. (All of this is taken from an article entitled: 11 Things You Should Know About Chiang Kai-shek by The Culture Trip)_
    3
  9927.  @PomegranateChocolate Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today. Since ROC failed to reunify China under KMT rule, why should China Ben under the banner of ROC when the PRC is far more successful?
    3
  9928.  Dusty Bauer  That's because increasingly, more and more scientific and technological advancements are being made in Chinese language. China publishes more scientific research papers than any other country in the world. For the first time, China has overtaken the United States in terms of the total number of science publications, according to statistics compiled by the US National Science Foundation (NSF). Source: China declared world’s largest producer of scientific articles nature.com/articles/d41586-018-00927-4 The agency’s report, released on 18 January, documents the United States’ increasing competition from China and other developing countries that are stepping up their investments in science and technology. So if scientific and technological advancements are being made in Chinese then is there really a need for Chinese to perfect our English?
    3
  9929. When China and USA cooperate, the whole world wins. When they don't cooperate, the world suffers.
    3
  9930. If she appreciate Chinese culture, then why is she pushing for feminist agenda in Chinese culture then?
    3
  9931. ​ @maynardyorke  "神州 Shenzhou its cute when CCP propaganda outlets actually take interest in our discourse. much love, hope your party fails" It's a shame that people like you don't appear interested in actual discussion and instead you openly wish for the failure of the Communist Party of China. The CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why'd you hope for such a catastrophic event to happen to China?
    3
  9932.  @MadDogPeople  "You forgot to mention all that population growth is Han Chinese moving to Tibet." Tibet Autonomous Region's population is comprised of 86% ethnic Tibetan, 12.2% ethnic Han and 0.8% other ethnicities. So ethnic Tibetans make up the majority of the people in Tibet.
    3
  9933.  @zetristan4525  "Go back to the full context, and respect other people with a balance of truth throughout, please." A balance of truth? So you're saying that I've haven't been truthful in my posts? Could you point out which part of what I've said has been untruthful? The context is you claiming to respect me when you accuse me of being paid to post streams of comments, so how's that a sign of respect?
    3
  9934.  @zetristan4525  "since you're bombarding most Cyrus comment sections and live chats dogmatically." Bombarding? I've only posted two main comment threads (this one, and another comment thread about Three Gorges Dam), so how's that considered bombarding Cyrus' comment sections? And again, I've asked you previously "What constitutes a "proportionate" number of comments in your view then?" Are people who stray away from your allocated number of posts deemed as being paid to do so?
    3
  9935.  @zetristan4525  "Why would anyone spend that much time going on and on, even with tangential promos, unless of course they're employed in a troll farm?" Look, I happen to agree with most of Cyrus Janssen's videos about China and I find them (largely) reflective of my own personal views. Then can't I devote time to post on his comment section to show my support for his channel? How does that automatically make me an employee of a troll farm? Are you saying that anyone who spends too much time on Cyrus' channel must be employed in a troll farm?
    3
  9936.  @zetristan4525  "Up your game, please, because you could offer a very knowledgeable, insightful balance." This is getting absurd. Exactly who do you think you are to tell others to "up their game"? You're making people say things that they may not support or agree with, just to meet your own self-defined criteria. I mean, if you truly harbor such strong emotions about a certain topic, then why not voice them out yourself, instead of telling others to do so for you?
    3
  9937.  @wally6193  The Canadians were arrested AFTER Meng was detained. Canada started this whole mess with China, they know how to end this stalemate, just release Meng Wanzhou first. You paint China as the enemy, then why should China paint Canada as a friend?
    3
  9938.  @wally6193  What did Chinese do to Australian land compared to the West? Why don't you tell the non-Native Australians to get out of Australia and leave those lands to Australian Aboriginals?
    3
  9939.  @northstarbirds1607  India can't even handle Pakistan alone, yet you still think India can fight two front war with China and Pakistan?
    3
  9940.  @valenrn8657  The Americans literally made Philippines into an American colony after they defeated Spain in the American-Spanish War. The Filipinos fought back against Americans, but they lost 200,000 - 1,000,000 Filipinos in the American-Philippine War, and still became an American colony.
    3
  9941.  @valenrn8657  "神州 Shenzhou Fact: The US doesn't have territorial disputes." Then why does the US concern itself over China's claim to the South China Sea Islands? Or Taiwan island for that matter?
    3
  9942.  @valenrn8657  Hawaii referendum was opened only to U.S citizens in Hawaii and the indigenous Hawaiins aren't allowed to participate in the referendum if they aren't US citizens themselves. And by applying to become U.S citizen, you are literally throwing your vote in favor of US, so how's that being fair?
    3
  9943.  @valenrn8657  Also, make whatever you want about the inhabitants of Xinjiang, but you've already admitted to the fact that Han Dynasty Emperor Wu (r. 141–87 BC) had wrested control over Xinjiang. So my statement that Xinjiang was part of China since before Christ was born is unchallenged.
    3
  9944.  @valenrn8657  So do you accept the 2014 Crimea Referendum in which an overwhelming majority (97%) voted to join the Russian Federation?
    3
  9945.  @qqyoung2899  So if you agree that letting Muslims do whatever they want is not a good thing, then what's wrong with Chinese government controlling Muslims and guiding them away from extremist tendencies and providing free education to boost their literacy and job skills training to prepare them for the workforce? Merkel choosing to accept refugees is Germany's own stance, but if Caucasian families are shrinking in sizer (low birth rates and high divorce rates) and if Muslim refugees are flooding Germany, then the country will start to see a shift in population demographics. There was even an anti-Muslim protest in Dresden, protesting the rising number of Muslims in Germany. Video: Germany at odds over its growing Muslim population youtube.com/watch?v=1Cf6dtq0zTc I've gone over the reason why Muslims are not wanted in Western countries, for the simple reason that they are under no pressure to adapt to their host country's religion and culture, Instead they are spreading Islam to your countries, after fleeing their own conflict-filled Islamic country. Why Western government bend over backwards to accommodate Muslims? Are they somehow superior to you, that you allow them free reign in your countries? The German people are known for being hardworking and their excellence in engineering, then why not incorporate some of these positive attributes to Muslim immigrants in your country? Imagine how much more accepting these anti-Muslim Germans would be, if they learnt that Muslims are willing to adapt to Germany? Then similarly why can't China impart some of our positive virtues (being studious for example) onto these Uighurs, whom might have gone down the path of terrorism, if left unchecked?
    3
  9946.  @iloveporkandchicken4718  "some of them hide Chinese identity, take an english name, use English, speak and act like from English-speaking country." Well, my username, 神州 Shenzhou, is a Chinese name and certainly not an English name, so why are you telling me all this?
    3
  9947.  @qqyoung2899  "神州 Shenzhou I believe that all citizens should be treated equally by the state." China has over 50 ethnic minorities, including Han, Tibetan, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchu, and even some Koreans, yet they are clearly Chinese citizens, but since Han Chinese make up over 90% of China's population, how can you expect equal treatment? Did you know that Chinese government offer special benefits to ethnic minorities like Tibetans and Uighurs such as tax exemption, priorities in healthcare, free education up to university and other benefits? Ethnic minorities are not subject to One-Child Policy (recently amended to Two-Child Policy) that Han Chinese are subject to and they can have as many kids as they want. If say, a Han Chinese apply for a certain course in university and needs 600 points to qualify, an ethnic minority (like Tibetans, Manchu, etc) need only 400 points (easier) for them to qualify for the same course as Han Chinese. So in China, ethnic minorities often get special treatment over the Han Chinese majority in certain fields. But this is necessary, because otherwise, Han Chinese will dominate every field and ethnic minorities have to compete with Han in many areas.
    3
  9948.  @11111110  Who said these were prison camps? The staff working there don't think so, neither do the students, and its the BBC that's trying to force its own prison narrative here when it clearly isn't. Also who says the solution isn't working? Since this initiative began, there've been no major riot in Xinjiang because of a small group of Uyghur terrorists. During the 2009 Urumiqi riots, some Uighurs started stabbing Han passers-by, overturning vehicles and setting them on fire, breaking to Han-owned businesses and looting and then burning the stores. Video: Uygur people riot Other Chinese's (non-uygur) store youtube.com/watch?v=j1gbwrLXYDM
    3
  9949.  @NoOneSleepInTokyo  Caged life in China? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your lands and spending money on your economies. Your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, ZTE, Xiaomi, Oppo, etc, are expanding overseas and Chinese investors are buying up real estate in your lands. So what makes you think Chinese people are caged? Chinese can be found virtually everywhere across the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    3
  9950.  @qqyoung2899   You want home schooling for them? You think many Uighurs can afford private tuition or for a single teacher to teach a single student? Chinese school staff aren't always so free to travel to all these Uighurs remote villages to "home school" them, so why not have them come to a fixed location for schooling then? It provides an opportunity for Uighurs of different villages to come and interact and get to know each other. And many of these Uighurs don't even know the basics and the fundamentals of education, so what's wrong with teaching them the basics? You want to teach them independent thinking, then you can always do that later in high school or college, but at this early stage, many of these Uighurs been heavily influenced by Islamic brainwashing, so what's wrong with teaching them to be loyal to China 1st and put their religion 2nd? I mean, don't you teach students in your schools about your country's history first and sing patriotic songs like the national anthem and so on? Because you need to build up the basics of education first, before you can start teaching them to think for themselves later in their educational life.
    3
  9951.  @qqyoung2899  You are in favour of compulsory education (and China indeed has compulsory education) and home schooling is difficult in Xinjiang, because Xinjiang is China's largest province, full of mountains and undeveloped regions, so you expect teachers to commute to all those remote villages to home school Uighurs? Why not gather the students from those remote villages, into a common area, where they can interact with each other, learn social skills, study and at the same time, enjoy recreational activities like painting, singing and dancing or sports like basketball? How to have access to all these facilities if you home school them in their remote villages? Most Asian countries (Korea, Japan, etc) teach some sort of national education where students are encouraged to loyal to country, so what's wrong with China doing the same? Which country do you come from, that does not encourage patriotism? How is this opinion "stupid"? Religion and Country has a lot of conflict. Look at how in medieval Europe, the Christian Churches sometimes held more power than the Kings themselves. There were wars fought in the name of religion, such Holy War, the Crusades, Jiihaad and so on. So why do you claim that there is not much conflict between religion and country? You wrote an entire wall of text, but there's hardly anything substantial behind your comment at all.
    3
  9952.  @thegoodolddays9193  Agreed, your logic can be applied to transvestites as well. If a man dons a female wig and dress and expects you to use the proper gender pronouns, does that make him (yes I said him) a real woman?
    3
  9953. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    3
  9954.  @koblongata  "神州 Shenzhou We all know Russia has no intentions of talks since day one..." Putin has been engaging in dialogue all this time, it's the West that have been disregarding Russia's point of view. Even from day one, Putin has made it clear that he wants a written reassurance that NATO would not continue expanding eastward, that Ukraine would not be allowed to join NATO. In fact in the 1990s, there was a verbal agreement by NATO to not expand eastwards, yet they've expanded into 13 countries since and are continuing eastward towards Russia's border. Many NATO countries did not want Ukraine to join NATO, yet they refused to put this down in words to reassure Putin, so after finding out that Putin's words have fallen on deaf ears all this time, Putin decide to finally act. You said: "And we all know the only way to stop Putin is for China, Putin's only lifeline, to openly condemn Putin." Russia has been sanctioned since 2014 and they've learned to adapt and develope self-sufficiency capabilities against sanctions, that make even China envious of their self-sufficiency. If you truly believe that China is Putin's only lifeline, then why is it American diplomats like Jake Sullivan and Anthony Blinken are still so arrogant to China, expecting that we bow down to their demands? The U.S is the one banning Chinese companies like Huawei and slapping sanctions on China, yet they still expect China to play along with them in condemning Russia? Who does the West think they are addressing here? The absence of U.S diplomacy is simply startling thinking that the U.S can command China to do their bidding. You said: "No, the Chinese government is teaching Chinese kids that if you want something from someone, just go and rob it, if that someone hired a security guard, then you can accuse that someone of threatening your livelihood, and then you can just go and kill that someone and take everything." If that's really the case then why is it mainland China still continues to leave Taiwan as it is, focusing on slowly reintegrating Taiwan back to the mainland through peaceful means rather than brute force? Even Hong Kong is originally part of China but was taken from China by Britain during the 19th century, yet the mainland doesn't just force Hong Kong to give up their system and become part of China (as it is within China's right) instead China allows Hong Kong to continue the One Country, Two System policies.
    3
  9955. @UCyRXng9S48e9VJzpTLveAMw "神州 Shenzhou Again, China is not neutral if they are helping support Russia by trading with them when others are not helping them by putting sanctions on them." But a neutral country will continue trading (as if nothing is happening) with both Russia and Ukraine instead of taking sides isn't it? If China stops trading with either Russia or Ukraine, that would mean China is no longer neutral and is taking Ukraine's side against Russia, so how does your logic make sense here? You said: "If you are half Chinese you are still Chinese just as much as you are half something else. You trying to say that half Chinese people aren't Chinese now." I never said that half Chinese people aren't Chinese now, I'm just demonstrating that there are multiple options, not restricted to just yes or no that you insist upon. What if this question was asked to someone who is quarter-Chinese? Or perhaps an eighth Chinese? Or a sixteenth? You said: "When asked this simple question, the person who's asking doesn't want your entire life story." The person's life story is what influences his/her answer to even such a simple question, just like the Russo-Ukraine conflict is rooted in historical complexities that many Westerners often dismiss and ignore. If you study the history of Russo-Ukraine relations, both Ukrainians and Russians are of one people. You said: "If other EU countries are financially supporting the Russian government during this time whilst simultaneously sanctioning them, it sounds like they need to reevaluate their priorities." The EU priorities are to garner enough fuel to survive the upcoming winter, and that's why they are continuing to purchase Russian gas even after slapping insane amount of sanctions on Russia. In this regard, they've certainly got their priorities straight. You said: "As far as I'm aware, most of the sanctions leveled at Russia are targeted sanctions aimed at Russian oligarchs, etc, who are helping to support Putin, not the Russian people themselves who are essentially caught up in this mess and are largely innocent." But those sanctions are affecting ordinary Russians living in Russia. Look at Western corporations like McDonald's, Coke and other corporations pulling out of Russia and they affect the ordinary Russians, not Putin's administration. In fact, sanctions don't work, all they do is create misery for ordinary people that's all. Even those ethnic Russians living in the West are being discriminated against if they refuse to condemn their motherland. Russian athletes are getting banned in the Olympics. Russian tennis players and chess players are forbidden from competitions unless they denounce their motherland. Likewise, many Russian musicians, composers, conductors, dancers and other artists are being forced to condemn their motherland or else face discrimination or being given the sack. You said: "Do I actually have evidence of China giving Russia the ability to get around sanctions? No, I don't." Then you shouldn't be making accusations like China is not neutral isn't it? You said: "When I was talking about supporting a dictator, I was talking about supporting the likes of a dictator like Putin that is unlawfully invading other sovereign countries. Let me know when the US starts doing that and I'll let you know when China starts doing that." USA is supporting Saudi Arabian dictatorship that's involved in a military intervention in Yemen.
    3
  9956.  @echelon2k8  "神州 Shenzhou No, neutral countries don't get involved." China had been trading with Russia and Ukraine prior to the Ukraine crisis, so as a neutral country, China continues to maintain trade with both Russia and Ukraine after the conflict began. Nothing's changed in our trade relations, and that's how China maintains neutrality, instead of giving in to pressure from outside parties. "They don't help countries that are being sanctioned through continuing to trade with them whilst not condemning them." Neutral countries don't care whether other countries are sanctioning their partner or not, they just continue to do business as usual, that's the meaning of being neutral, and that's the stance that China has taken regarding both Russia and Ukraine. "By not condemning them and by helping them through continued trade, they are not being neutral; they are de facto supporting the country that is being sanctioned and condemned, even if they are also trading with the Ukraine and even if they are not condemning the sanctioned country." Neutral countries do not condemn anything and they just continue trade relations as per normal, which is what China's stance is regarding Russia and Ukraine. If China gives in to outside pressure to condemn another country, that means China is no longer neutral and is taking up a side here. "They don't have to be supporting one country over another to not be neutral when they are helping the country that is being sanctioned by others." China isn't supporting one country over another, China is supporting both Russia and Ukraine. China is sending humanitarian aid to Ukraine as well as continuing business with Russia as per normal, instead of bowing down to pressure from other countries just because they choose to sanction a country, doesn't mean that China has to do the same. This is the hallmark of a neutral country, to continue to maintain relations with both sides. "This is precisely the reason why other nations are wondering why China has stayed silent over this and has not condemned Russia for their invasion and why they are continually being warned not to provide Russia will military aid, etc." Again, because China's stance is neutral. Condemnation of any party is already taken as choosing a side and no longer maintaining neutrality. Also, do you have any evidence of China providing Russia with military aid? Russia is literally the world's 2nd largest weapons exporter, and China is the second-largest buyer of Russian weaponry. "Because if experience has taught them anything, China will say one thing yet do another." That's the experience China has of the USA. During the Biden-Xi meeting, President Xi remarked that some people in the US did not implement the important consensus reached in the November summit. "That's because the options are only yes or no. You're either Chinese or you're not." That's how the fallacy of false dichotomy works, by erroneously restricting what options are available when there more choices in actuality. "Because they are not pretending that Russian government is not doing what they are obviously doing." So since you agreed that EU countries continue to buy Russian gas in order to tide themselves over the winter, then what's the basis of you continuing to criticize China when EU countries continue to trade with Russia? You've literally showing your double standards here vis-a-vis EU trading with Russia and China trading with Russia. "They're not staying silent on their behavior and continuing to trade with them like nothing's wrong with them like a bunch of complete sociopaths." Yes, because China's stance is neutral, and neutral countries don't condemn anything, nor do they bow down to pressure to take a side in a conflict. "That may be, but that's not due to the sanctions themselves, that's due to the consequences of the sanctions." So NATO countries clearly don't care about Russian civilians since they slap sanctions on Russia in order to hurt the living standards of Russian civilians, since that is the purpose of sanctions after all; to hurt civilian populations. And that includes NATO civilians too now suffering under the sanctions themselves and facing inflation and increasing gas prices. "No, they're not. Russian/Ukrainian isn't a race, it's a nationality/ ethnic group." Ukrainians are also getting implicated, there was an example of a Russian-style bistro in America getting vandalized, even though the owner is a Ukrainian and the staff employed are Ukrainian themselves. This is just how little some people in the West make the effort to distinguish between Russian and Ukrainian. "There are plenty of Russians in the West and in Russia itself who are against Putin's war, so anyone who is indiscriminately 'racially' targeting anyone of "Russian descent" in the West for the actions of Vladimir Putin is obviously an idiot." So those Westerners who banned long-dead Russian composes like Tchaikovsky and Dostoevsky are "idiots" in your view? Even Yuri Gagarin, the first man in space is getting rewritten by the Space Foundation. And again, these Russian musicians, dancers, athletes, sportsmen, chess players, are being discriminated against just because they're Russian, so it's as though the West is against Russian people themselves. "I mean, since when is Yemen a democracy?" You asked for "supporting the likes of a dictator like Putin that is unlawfully invading other sovereign countries." you never mentioned that it had to be democratic. And since you brought it up, since when is Ukraine a democracy? "Carrie Lam was voted leader in 2017 amid claims of Mainland China meddling, if I recall correctly." Could you explain how mainland Beijing interfered in Carrie Lam's election in 2017? "Only 0.03% of Hong Kong’s registered voters were are able to cast a ballot, with the election committee comprising mostly of elites loyal to Beijing." The Election Committee is entirely comprised of Hong Kong people themselves and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections, so the fact remains that Hong Kong people voted for Carrie Lam. 100% of the votes were cast by Hong Kong people, which leaves 0% cast by Beijing, so clearly the people of Hong Kong voted during their election. Who is Nathan Law and what does he say matter? We have just proven that the Hong Kong people elected their leaders, since there were 0 votes cast by Beijing. "Protesting is a peaceful public display of disapproval, rioting is what you described and the vast majority of people who were dissatisfied at their puppet government for what Beijing was doing though them were protestors, not rioters." And what was Beijing doing to them that was making the Hong Kong protestors protest? The Hong Kong Extradition Bill was proposed because of a Hong Kong man (name Chan) who strangled his pregnant girlfriend (Poon) to death in Taiwan and flew back to Hong Kong, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Taiwan wanted to extradite this Hong Kong murderer, but Hong Kong realized they had no extradition treaty. Since the crime occurred in Taiwan, Hong Kong courts are powerless to convict Chan of crimes committed outside of Hong Kong, so the Hong Kong Extradition Bill was drawn up to plug up this legal loophole. But the Hong Kong protestors kept protesting until the bill was eventually scrapped and now a Hong Kong murderer roams free and unpunished. "The Joint Declaration stipulated that Hong Kong would retain its high degree of autonomy, rights and freedoms for 50 years after the handover. This hasn't happened" Hong Kong clearly enjoys a high degree of autonomy, rights and freedoms. Hong Kong was ranked among the world's freest in the Index of Freedom in the World with a score of 8.81. In Economic Freedom of the World Hong Kong was ranked 1st with a score of 8.91. "The recent mass arrests of pro-democracy activists and politicians has undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and stifled political pluralism contrary to the aim of moving towards universal suffrage as set out in the city’s mini-constitution." The second part of Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條) says: "The method for selecting the Chief Executive shall be specified in the light of the actual situation in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and in accordance with the principle of gradual and orderly progress." so clearly Beijing reserves the right to amend the methods of selection based on what's happening on the ground. So China did not violate the Joint Declaration. "Beijing has even since said that they would refuse to appoint an unsupportive Chief Executive even if they were democratically elected. That says everything really." Again, that's part of Article 45 which states that Beijing has the right to appoint the Hong Kong Chief Executive like I mentioned previously. All in all, China did not violate the Joint Declaration. "Again, the CPC has never ruled over Taiwan, yet this is evidently their intention and the only sure way they seem to think they can accomplish this is by invading a democratically self-ruled Taiwan with military force." If CPC has never ruled over Taiwan, then why is it Taiwan cannot participate in the Olympics under their own name? Instead they have to use the name "Chinese Taipei" at the Olympics. And lastly, you're just talking about a hypothetical scenario of Taiwan conflict that hasn't actually happened so how can you claim the only sure way the CPC think they can accomplish this is by attacking a democratically self-ruled Taiwan with military force? If that was the case, why hasn't it happen yet? It's just speculation in your mind that's all.
    3
  9957.  @StephenMortimer  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by the rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china) which were in great demand throughout the ancient world. Take Han Chinese traditional clothing Hanfu (汉服) for example and it has 5,000 years of history and even the Japanese Kimono and Korean Hanbok clothing have their origins in Chinese Hanfu. Video: Beautiful Traditional Costume: Han Chinese Clothing (Hanfu) youtu.be/T6CucJxiWec?t=5
    3
  9958.  @caseymassey2394  At the 8 minute mark of the video, it shows that Uighur preschool enrollment has jumped 148% and Xinjiang region jumped by 82%, so isn't it good that more kids are getting enrolled in preschool and receiving a proper education? Left on their own, most Uighur parents won't even send their kids to school, that's why Uighur enrollment has been abysmally low in Xinjiang.
    3
  9959.  @jayshon1348  China runs a business, not a charity drive, and of course Chinese companies and banks expect to make some money off their investments. Which business or bank in the world does not want returns on investments? In African countries, China is helping build infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, powerstations, dams, ports, airpots in exchange for raw materials to power our growth. China has done much to help improve Africa in just decades as compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    3
  9960. I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and while she was quite emotional and previously had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, I don't see any allegations of sexual assault on Peng Shuai's post (point it out to me if you can). On 17 November, Peng Shuai wrote an email to WTA claiming that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    3
  9961. That's also what happen when countries follow democracy and politicians rely on citizen votes to stay in power. By targeting the blue collar workers who voted for Trump, such as the soybean producers, China is attacking Trump's base.
    3
  9962.  @stunningandbrave2520  Democracy actually has a history of failure. Athenian democracy failed. Spartan democracy failed. Greek democracy failed, even the Republic of Rome eventually crumbled. These early prototype democracies weren't successful, and democracy wasn't even popular in other parts of the ancient world. Modern Western democracy is a different breed, but that means it only has around 200-300 years of history, and is not guaranteed to be successful.
    3
  9963.  @MarkYeung1  Vladimir Putin was evacuating Ukrainian children from the conflict zone to safety in Russia. About 400 children have been safely returned to family members and relatives in Ukraine. How is this deserving of an arrest warrant by the ICC?
    3
  9964. Kishore seems to have equated ASEAN with the EU, thinking that what works in ASEAN will also work in the EU. But the difference is the Asian way of thinking in ASEAN compared with the Western way of thinking in the EU.
    3
  9965.  @aeoliaschenberg5880  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    3
  9966. +blister Michel What's wrong with CCP's trade practices? Here's how I see it: America: We want you, China, to make this product cheaply to give us the edge over our competitors. China:Sure thing, but we'll need access to your blueprints and other information to be able to make those products America: Done! About the Zambian merchandise scenario, Chinese citizens have always welcomed foreign goods like Rolex watches, Gucci bags, Toyota cars, Apple iPhones, etc, etc. so why would Chinese begrudge Zambian goods? If there's something to attract Chinese buyers, then Chinese would gladly buy those goods according to demand.
    3
  9967. 難道是戰忽局同志嗎？誤會了！
    3
  9968. The American Dream is that every poor immigrant to America can hopefully strike it rich one day, and move up the social ladder to a higher rung. That's why USA seem to accept every immigrant, regardless of their background. The Chinese Dream is the eventual rejuvenation of our nation, to work together collectively for the nation's progress. For that, China needs human capital, such as scientists, researchers, entrepreneurs, or anyone useful to China. That's why China has strict immigration laws, only admitting in people who can contribute to society.
    3
  9969.  @Freedom_and_Democracy  "People that support Gaza should support Tibet." They should support Tibet's freedom from the 14th Dalai Lama, after he accepted US money to carry out separatist activities.
    3
  9970.  @AyupChuck  Alright then, show me your evidence of the social credit system. Have you talked to anyone with such a social score? What's the maximum and minimum range of values of a person's social score? What's the average social score of a person like? Go on, I'm willing to hear you out.
    3
  9971. China builds infrastructure in other countries. USA steals infrastructure in other countries.
    3
  9972. China's automotive companies are in China, which is the world's largest automotive market (much larger than US and Canada combined) so doesn't that mean Chinese automakers see more customers than Hyundai? Chinese electric vehicle companies like BYD, is also becoming more globally recognized. In 2015, BYD Auto was the best selling global electric vehicle brand, ahead of Luxgen. For a second year running, BYD was the world's top selling plug-in electric car manufacturer with over 100,000 units delivered in 2016. In October 2016, BYD Auto became the all-time second largest global plug-in car manufacturer ahead of Luxgen.
    3
  9973. wisdomleader2017 Recently in April 2018, President Xi Jinping promised to reduce tariffs on automobiles imported into China and significantly broaden market access for foreign companies. But like I said, China is world's largest automotive industry, so why do Chinese automakers see the need to expand to other markets? Other markets are going to be smaller than China's and there will be bound to be significant barriers to entry. I mean, you are the one claiming China's automotive industry will never surpass Japan, but when I brought up how China's hi-speed railway industry surpassed Japan, you just dismissed it, even though China was initially behind Japan in hi-speed railway development. So what makes you so certain China's automakers will never surpass Japan in the future?
    3
  9974. wisdomleader2017 When WTO was founded in 1995, China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate it as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because USA and its allies requested that China first reform various policies. The US imposed additional conditions on China and when China joined the WTO, we agreed to considerably harsher conditions than other developing countries at that time. So why you think China did not put such promises into practice? Isn't China's economy today much more open than it was prior to joining WTO? Even now, President Trump just unilaterally slap sanctions on steel and aluminum, all without going through the proper WTO channels, so isn't USA the one not upholding WTO promises here? I mentioned high speed railway, because it is an area in which China has successfully surpassed Japan. You are the one claiming China's automotive industry will never surpass Japan, then where is your proof? China already surpassed Japan in other fields like hi-speed railway, so what makes you think China's automotive industry will never surpass Japan?
    3
  9975. wisdomleader2017 China's economy today is much more open than it was prior to 1970s, when China was still following communist market system, before Deng Xiaoping introduced economic reforms. I mean, USA and its allies are constantly talking about how protectionist China's economy is, but in truth since 2013, the USA is the world's most protectionist country with over 800 of such protectionist measures, compared to China's 200-300 of such protectionist measures. What gives USA the right to impose its own restrictions on China's joining the WTO as a founding member, when USA itself follows protectionism to an extreme? When did I ever claim that China's automotive industry will surpass Japan without such technology transfer? I never mentioned anything about "technology transfer" so why should I provide proof of China's automotive industry will surpass Japan without technology transfer? I also shown that Chinese companies like BYD Auto was the best selling global electric vehicle brand in 2015, so that is one area in which China's automotive industry has seemingly surpassed Japan.
    3
  9976. +wisdomleader2017 According to Global Trade Alert, USA is the world's most protectionist country with over 800 of such protectionist measures, compared to China's 200-300 of such protectionist measures. Source: Wikipedia: Protectionism Its your own personal opinion if you think that originality matters. But if other designs can greatly improve on the original design, then why is it do you think that only originality matters? I clearly mentioned that BYD Auto was the best selling global electric vehicle brand in 2015. Still the electric car industry is one area in which China's automotive industry is surpassing Japan's. In 2017, China sold more light duty plug in electric vehicle than Japan, at 1,245.9 units compared to Japan's 207.2 units, in terms of cumulative sales.
    3
  9977. wisdomleader2017 In the past, Westerners have also made use of Chinese inventions like paper, compass and especially gunpowder, but do Chinese people complain about Westerners using our technology? In addition to gunpowder, ancient Chinese invented handcannons, handgrenades, fragmentation bombs, landmines, naval mines, exploding cannonballs, rocket launchers, etc, but if Westerners took those designs and improved on them, then why does originality still matters? It's your own opinion that originality matters of course, but in real life, if other designs can greatly improve on the original design then originality itself does not matter, as history has shown. People have been copying and improving on other people's original designs for much of history and that is how society progresses as a whole.
    3
  9978. Many countries have expressed support for China's Belt and Road Initiative, so you expect China to somehow cater to every country's demand out there? Even if China built CPEC along border of Kashmir, Indian government still make noise whenever China builds road along India's borders. So how is Asia going to progress if China is not even allowed to built roads at all?
    3
  9979. Hopefully the people of Taiwan are smarter than that.
    3
  9980. What accomplishment? All President Trump did was name calling and imposing tariffs on Pyongyang, but it was China that managed to wring out a verbal acknowledgement from Kim Jung Un about denuclearization.
    3
  9981. Pastor wants to protect those idealistic kids, many of which haven't even graduated from school, yet they already think they know how to best govern Hong Kong? Their teenage minds haven't even matured and they haven't even stepped out into real working world of adults, yet these naive teens already gotten swept up by political fervor.
    3
  9982. Regarding your first point that the People's Republic of China does NOT have sovereignty over Taiwan, then why is it Taiwan cannot formally amend their constitution to declare independence? Why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there some force that's preventing Taiwan from amending their constitution or joining the UN?
    3
  9983. In China, the people feel safe at night. In USA, even the presidential candidates aren't safe in the day.
    3
  9984.  @caleblee1780  China has made significant advances in global tech since then, take Deepseek for example. It costs just a fraction of its western counterpart, and it's developers even made it open source. Merchant class are concerned primarily with making profits, which is why China will never allow them to overthrow the government. Today's merchants are the big corporations that hold power over many governments (especially those in the West) whereas China has found a balance between advancing technology as well as making lives better for the people.
    3
  9985.  @caleblee1780  Hollow coming from China? Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself? China was once an impoverished, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today China has transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (in fact, the largest by purchasing power parity), the factory of the world (i.e Made in China), having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Chinese government. So what if it's different political system from the west? Not all countries have to adopt western-style democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. China should chart our own path to the future, instead of just blindly copying western-style democracy because the west says so.
    3
  9986. Black Mirror is merely a work of fiction, and the authors purposely exaggerate the consequences for entertainment purposes.
    3
  9987. The United States is world's most protectionist country, with over 800 of such protectionist measures, compared to China's 200-300 of such measures.
    3
  9988. +Adityaa Chaubey Who are you to insult people by calling them a fool? Where is Bhutanese government's evidence to support its territorial claims? Our government claimed Donglong and have produced ample evidence to support our claim. Why don't you do some research yourself?
    3
  9989. +ss g Why do you insult me personally? Chinese people can access Western websites using VPN as well as through various other methods. Why do you assume I am "licensed" by Chinese government to be here?
    3
  9990. +Adityaa Chaubey China has the 1890 Convention of Calcutta to support our claim to Donglong. But Bhutan has not divulged any evidence to support its claim to Doklam.
    3
  9991. +Adityaa Chaubey This website shows the details of the 1890 treaty. According to the following source: -The line commenced at Mount Gipmochi on the Bhutan frontier, and followed the above watershed to the point where it met Nepali territory. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_of_Calcutta As far as I know, PLA construction troops did not cross Mt Gipmochi, and therefore, remained within Chinese territory at all times. I do agree that war between China and India over this territory is rather pointless, and will only hinder Asia's development. China's dream is to make Asia strong, by developing new economies in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal and Bangladesh.
    3
  9992. +Aniruddh Joshi So... where is Bhutanese government's proof of ownership then, if you keep disputing my points?
    3
  9993. +Adityaa Chaubey According to the 1890 treaty, Mount Gipmochi is clearly stated as the beginning of the boundary with Bhutan. Even if it's not the highest point, it is still clearly being referenced in the latter part of the treaty. And If suddenly the tri-junction is changed to Batang La by India, then why wasn't China informed of such an important change? Who is India to just unilaterally change this treaty, without informing and notifying China of this change? It is a tri-junction, of which China is a member, so why weren't we consulted on this issue at all, before India deciding on the point by themselves? You argue against 1890 treaty, but it is still a formal agreement referencing Mt Gipmochi as the tri-junction, while there is no formal agreement saying Batang La is the tri-junction.
    3
  9994. +Mohit Khanna Chinese government would do the exact same things like what is happening now in Donglong. The government would make multiple repeated requests for Indian government to withdraw its troops from our territory, in order to avoid provoking any war because of misunderstandings. We will give Indian government time to process its thoughts, but we will not be lulled into making the first shot. Indian troops are already invading territory they do not claim as their own uninvitedly, so by various definitions, they are already considered invaders China is one of the biggest trade partners with USA, Japan, Australia and Vietnam and these countries won't want to lose their economic links to China, because of a territorial dispute by India, for land that India doesn't even claim for itself. Furthermore, Bhutan does not maintain foreign relations with USA, so why would USA want to support Bhutan's territorial claims? And this thread was started by me, so who are you to tell me to stop commenting? You people constantly mock and insult me and don't even give evidence to support your claims, so what makes think you are justified?
    3
  9995. +Aniruddh Joshi I don't know what Indian's think of CPEC and OBOR, but to China, CPEC is closely related to OBOR and it is difficult to separate the two initiatives. According to the following source: "The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor and the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor are closely related to the Belt and Road Initiative, and therefore require closer cooperation and greater progress." ( english.cri.cn/12394/2015/03/29/2941s872030_1.htm ) Therefore to Chinese mindset, you can't have OBOR without CPEC. OBOR faces many geopolitical issues like this and it is not going to be easy to implement such corridor projects without offending one country or another.
    3
  9996. +Adityaa Chaubey Chinese government has provided ample evidence support our claims, including maps and treaties. Also, what about Bhutanese government evidence at all? What right does Indian government have to take on Bhutan's territorial claims for itself? The treaty between India and Bhutan only says that India will help Bhutan, but does not say that India will fight for Bhutan's territorial claims? You constantly mock and insult me for my evidence, but you expect me to believe you when you have no solid evidence of your own? Where is proof of ownership that Bhutan controls that territory, and why isn't Bhutan even publishing its own evidence to support its territorial claim? +Mohit Khanna The Straits of Malacca is so much further from Andaman and Nicobar islands, and Straits is still within waters of Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia etc. so how does that obstruct Chinese trade? Furthermore like I said, China is big trading partners with USA, Europe and rest of world. You think USA, Europe etc would tolerate Indian blockade prevent Chinese goods from reaching those countries? All you people shown is that you dimiss any evidence I provide, belittle Chinese people and our armies, and still expect me to believe you? If war breaks out, the conflict won't be restricted to Donglong, but in other contested areas like Ladakh and so on. China has demonstrated the ability to take out a satellite in orbit from a ground -launched missile (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-satellite_weapon ) and is 3rd country in world to achieve that currently. The government can also apply cyberattacks (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberattack#China.2C_United_States_and_others ) and other venues of attack, such as disrupting India's economy and so on. But Chinese people don't want war, which is why the government giving India plenty of time to commit to its choice. War is not in our countries interest, and will only hurt our economies while Western countries continue to progress. The BRICS summit is happening soon in China, and our countries should take this opportunity to discuss issues. We should be cooperating to resist Western influence in our countries, not fighting amongst ourselves.
    3
  9997. +Adityaa Chaubey The only contradiction in the treaty is that the highest watershed was assumed to be Mount Gipmochi. But it is also explicitly stated that Mt Gipmochi is the trijunction. If you continue to mock my evidence, then what evidence does Indian government have to show for its claims? You have no evidence of your own, yet you continue ridiculing me? You claim Bhutanese troops tried stop PLA road construction? Then where are these Bhutanese troops now? We have claimed withdrawal of Indian troops from our territory many times, but not Bhutanese troops, because they aren't there. So what makes you say Bhutanese army even entered Donglong in the first place? You really think international committee siding with India? Bhutan doesn't even have diplomatic relations with other UNSC members, which are USA, Britain, France, Russia. So why would these countries care about supporting Bhutanese territorial claims, especially since Bhutanese government has not shown evidence to support its claims? China is big trading partners with all these countries, so you think they willing to risk their economies to side with India against China for territory India does not claim as its own, and Bhutan has no proof of ownership? I think someone else here is dreaming, and needs to wake up here. Even if these UNSC remains neutral in our territorial dispute, China still has Pakistan that stands to benefit by perhaps taking the opportunity to expand its claims on Kashmir, while India being distracted by China, Lastly, I don't insult or mock your entire race like what you are doing to Chinese people. Chinese people have been shown to be among the most hardworking and intelligent people, with long history and culture spanning 5000 years. Our culture greatly influenced other East Asian countries like Japan and Korea, and these countries have also succeeded in their own ways and are some of world's newest developing economies. Our culture has also spread beyond to the West, so much that there are Chinatown enclaves in virtually every major city in the world. So who are you to call insult and label all Chinese people "a disease which needs to be treated"? You are simply despicable person to resort to using such derogatory terms against our people.
    3
  9998.  @Esquera123  Like I said, China has so many neighbors, so marking out China's entire border is certainly no easy feat. 14 land neighbors in total and each boundary has to be settle individually, kilometer by kilometer, country-to-country. If there are any border disputes with Nepal or Russia, I've yet to hear of them from their leaders. But since China successfully signed border treaties with Nepal and Russia, then I'm sure any border issues can be easily worked out through negotiations with those two countries. You think Johnny Harris knows about China's border disputes without actually visiting China's border and looking at the geography carefully and factoring historical boundaries and so on? Of course not, he's just making these videos for the views As for India and Bhutan, I've already mentioned that China has yet to settle border dispute with those countries. China negotiated 30 times with India, and 25 times with Bhutan, yet still our border issue remains unresolved. Even though China has successfully negotiated border treaties with all of other other land neighbors, apart from these two countries. Then honestly speaking does the fault lie with China? Or specifically with those two countries? The crux of the China-India border dispute is because India was colonized by Britain, and the British cartographer, Henry McMahon, arbitrarily drew up India's border with China. The McMahon line was drawn without regard for geography or existing historical boundaries between India and China, and even after the British left India, India still insists on following through with this line drawn by the British, instead of returning to the actual historical boundary between China and India that existed before McMahon.
    3
  9999.  @Esquera123  About housing in China, today China is a country of homeowners with more than 90% of households owning homes (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations (Huang et al., 2020). This achievement is particularly impressive and is in sharp contrast to the recent decline of homeownership rate in the US, Western Europe and other developed countries. The rate of homeownership in the USA is only 63% in 2017. (US Census Bureau, 2018).
    3
  10000.  @Esquera123  As for the South China Sea, the Vietnamese PM Pham van Dong had acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were Chinese territory, in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958._ (Source: Wikipedia: File:1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai) So Vietnam's PM acknowledged that Spratly and Paracel Islands were within China's territorial waters. Yet Vietnam later changed their mind and started claiming those islands as within their territory.
    3
  10001.  @Esquera123  Lol, if you meet two Chinese people (one from Taiwan and one from mainland China) who talked to you in Mandarin Chinese, you won't be able to tell who is from Taiwan island and who is from mainland China. The fact remains that Taiwan island inalienable part of China. Even Taiwan's constitution has the word China in it's name, it's the Republic of China. And SMIC has made advanced chips, whereas Nvidia can't even make its own chips, it relies on a company in Taiwan island to do so. So it's Chinese workers in Taiwan that make those advanced chips, yet all you seem to do is mock Chinese people in general, when USA is dependent on those same Chinese workers to make chips for them. The sheer hubris coming from you.
    3
  10002.  @Esquera123  There are fields in which China has already surpassed that of the Western countries. For example, China is home to the world's largest high-speed rail network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. High Speed Railway (HSR) Construction by Country (2019) 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. France (3,870 km) 4. Germany (3,596 km) 5. Japan (3,422 km) 6. Russia (2,026 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,997 km) 8. Italy (1,697 km) 9. South Korea (1,481 km) 10. Finland (744 km) Our trains are fast and the journey very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even tried balancing a coin on its edge near the window sill of a train travelling at 350 kph and the coin remained balanced for a long time.
    3
  10003.  @Esquera123  "Taiwan real name is Republic of China " I've glad that even you've acknowledged that Taiwan is part of China, since they have the word China their name. If you meet two Chinese people, you won't be able to tell who's from Taiwan island and who's from mainland China. Yet you look down on Chinese people when Nvidia can't even make their own chips and has to depend on Chinese workers in Taiwan Island to make those advanced chips for them.
    3
  10004.  @Esquera123  Even in the Olympics, the athletes from Taiwan can only compete under the name "Chinese Taipei." Even you've acknowledged that Taiwan's real name is Republic of China. Both the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China consider each other to be the real China, and both have came to the consensus that Taiwan is part of China. And if you meet people from Taiwan island and mainland China, you won't be able to tell who's from where, and they'll both be considered Chinese to you. Yet you look down on Chinese people when Nvidia can't even make their own chips and has to depend on Chinese workers in Taiwan Island to make those advanced chips for them.
    3
  10005.  @Esquera123  Arizona? The wafer fabrication process requires copious amounts of water. There was this time when Taiwan island experience drought, and wafer fabrication could not continue without sufficient water supply. Yet the USA is opening chip plants in the arid Arizona desert of all places?
    3
  10006.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. also, American depends on Taiwanese Chinese, not Mainland Chinese. " So you're admitting that America depends on Chinese to make their advance chips, since Nvidia is incapable of fabricating their own chips? Then who are you to look down on Chinese when even the US depends on Chinese workers for their chips?
    3
  10007.  @Esquera123  What makes you think mainland Chinese people aren't free? Chinese mainlanders are free to travel overseas for work, study and play. I mean, haven't you heard of mainland Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending coin on your tourist industry? Or of mainland Chinese international students, studying in Western schools and universities? In fact, before 2019, China was the world's largest source of tourists and international students.
    3
  10008. ​ @Esquera123  Mainland China trains more STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) than any other in the world. The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates (2016) 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... (Source: World Economic Forum) Whereas how many STEM graduates are from Taiwan island compared to the mainland?
    3
  10009.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. I look down on Mainland China not Taiwnese China." For what reason? Just because mainland China is home to the majority of the world's Chinese people? Or that mainland China transformed from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into an economic juggernaut that's also the factory of the world? Many things that you bought have the Made-in-China label attached to them, yet you look down on mainland China?
    3
  10010.  @Esquera123  About Tiananmen Square, Wikileaks cables from the US embassy in Beijing have shown there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square in June 1989. A Chilean diplomat (named Carlos Gallo and his wife) were visiting the Square at that time, and provided eyewitness accounts to the events unfolding in the Square. He did not observe any mass firing of weapons into the crowds, and that most of the troops which entered the Square were actually armed only with anti-riot gear — truncheons and wooden clubs.
    3
  10011.  @Esquera123  Besides hydroelectricity, China is also home to the world's largest producer of solar energy. China is the world's largest maker of solar panels after all. Countries with the highest produced solar energy in MWh per year (2018) 1. China (177,500,000) 2. United States (97,118,000) 3. Japan (71,688,000) 4. Germany (46,164,000) 5. India (30,732,000) 6. Italy (23,230,000) 7. United Kingdom (12,921,000) 8. Spain (12,520,000) 9. Australia (12,081,000) 10. France (10,158,000)
    3
  10012.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. to solve this, easy, build up the manpower, train bro train" Are American workers themselves even willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers? If not, then the cost of Made-in-America chips will be significantly higher than Made-in-China chips, so how will that be competitive? Also would American workers even accept Chinese workers from Taiwan taking over their jobs in the chip plant?
    3
  10013.  @Esquera123  "They name "Chinese Taipei" because they were forced to." So you're saying that Taiwan isn't an independent nation after all, since they allow mainland China to dictate what their name should be called? Then means you've acknowledged that Taiwan is part of China after all.
    3
  10014.  @Esquera123  China is also home to the world's largest wind farms, producing more wind power than any other. Countries by Wind Energy Production in 2018 by Gigawatt hour. 1. China (366,000) 2. United States (277,729) 3. Germany (111,590) 4. India (60,311) 5. United Kingdom (57,115) 6. Spain (50,836) 7. Brazil (48,479) 8. Canada (32,170) 9. France (28,167) 10. Turkey (19,825)
    3
  10015.  @Esquera123  Why did the ROC lose the mainland to the PRC and had to flee to Taiwan island then? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang (KMT) enjoyed several advantages such as massive wealth (taxed from peasants) superior weapons and superior numbers over the CPC. Yet despite all these advantages the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, outnumbered, starving CPC peasant army and had to flee to Taiwan island? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the CPC's right to rule China.
    3
  10016.  @otsa120  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    3
  10017.  @otsa120  Look at China today, and our People's Liberation Army (world's largest land army) hasn't had any actual combat experience since 1979 and which country is China currently at war with? None! Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc in African countries. Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: /watch?v=TtduKDpy4oc Whereas USA is involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing those countries, killing civilians and destroying property, (Iraq Body Count project reported some 200,000 Iraqi civilian deaths) and leaving people homeless, jobless, without family and harboring resentment against USA, that's why some of them flock to join the terrorists cause.
    3
  10018.  @otsa120  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    3
  10019. @Devron Ave Granted, the Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, Europe, USA and India. Source: china-profile(dot)com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    3
  10020.  @gulamog5041  You said: "Taiwan is a sovereign country because CCP doesn't control them." If you claim Taiwan is a sovereign country, then why is Taiwan not a member of the United Nations or World Health Organization? You said the communist party don't control Taiwan, then Taiwan should have no problems joining the UN or WHO since it's not being controlled. Or is there something controlling Taiwan and preventing them from joining UN or WHO?
    3
  10021.  @Ayeen1986  This amlapuri guy never answer any question, he just shoot his mouth off over accusations that he cannot substantiate, and contradict himself in the process. So far, he failed to explained how Hambantota Deal was responsible for Sri Lanka's economic woes, he falsely claimed Sri Lankan land was leased (when there is no evidence of Sri Lankan land being leased).
    3
  10022.  @almondcaeser9587  China actually helped Vietnam gain independence from the French. During the First Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla force in warfare tactics. China also sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help Vietnamese fight for independence. From 1950 to 1954 the Chinese government shipped goods, materials, and medicine worth $43 billion (in 2019 dollars) to Vietnam. From 1950 to 1956 the Chinese government shipped 155,000 small arms, 58 million rounds of ammunition, 4,630 artillery pieces, 1,080,000 artillery shells, 840,000 hand grenades, 1,400,000 uniforms, 1,200 vehicles, 14,000 tons of food, and 26,000 tons of fuel to Vietnam. - Wikipedia: First Indochina War Yet many Vietnamese nationalist conveniently forgotten the aid that China gave to them during their fight for independence, some believe that they won their independence on their own.
    3
  10023.  @davidpeppers551  Video: Fact: Huawei isn't built on Chinese state funding youtu.be/HAffWwL1E-Q
    3
  10024.  @thomasjamison2050  The US government did not help China, take China's entry into the World Trade Organisation for example. When WTO was founded in 1995, China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate our country as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because the United States, European countries, and Japan requested that China first reform various tariff policies, including tariff reductions, open markets and industrial policies. Thats why China had a late entry into WTO in 2001, instead of being a founding member in 1995. Because the United States and its allies posed obstacles to China's entry into WTO.
    3
  10025.  @thomasjamison2050  The USA and its allies posed barriers to China's entry into the World Trade Organisation, that's why China had a late entry into WTO in 2001, instead of being a founding member in 1995. The American textile industry lobbied Congress for, and received, tariffs on Chinese textiles according to the WTO Agreement on Textiles and Clothing. In reaction to 1989, the Bush administration and Congress imposed administrative and legal constraints on investment, exports, and other trade relations with China.
    3
  10026.  @thomasjamison2050  Those good-paying jobs are no longer good-paying. Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing etc cheap so that the cost of living in America is kept to a minimum. Think about the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other things like cars, housing, luxury goods, rent, school fees, etc. I mean, isn't that why so many Americans flock to Walmart because of their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money? For all your talk about Walmart, you Americans profit from cheaper Chinese goods saving you money on living expenses, at the expense of Chinese workers working for a lower pay than American workers.
    3
  10027.  @Camcolito  So either the Americans screwed the American workers, or the Americans screwed the Chinese workers. Either way, Americans profit off cheaper Chinese goods saving money on living expenses, at the expense of Chinese workers (whom take an even lower salary than American workers) I mean, for all that guy's complaint about Walmart, many Americans still flock to Walmart because of their everyday low prices, because it saves them money on living expenses, to spend elsewhere.
    3
  10028.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou It is not China following the United States. It is the United States following China." So you agree that China should follow our own path to success instead of the United States? Then why are you unhappy when China follows our own path? If anything, shouldn't you be unhappy with the U.S path?
    3
  10029.  @alanliu6848  You seriously never heard about this? Have you visited World Health Organization website for information pertaining to the coronavirus? Turns out China had informed WHO of mysterious pneumonia-like illness on 31st Dec 2019, that's how the novel coronavirus became known as COVID-19. China had shared information our scientists gleamed about the coronavirus and shared the information with WHO, so you had access to the same information China has regarding COVID-19. Communist members like Jack Ma even published COVID-19 Handbook and made it available online for download, so what makes you think China covered up this virus? Additionally, the world knew about China locking down Wuhan (a city of 11 million), and building 2 temporary hospitals, a 1,000-bed hospital in 10 days, and a 1,200 bed hospital in 12 days, showing the world just how dangerous Covid-19 is, yet Western countries just mocked China's handling of the Covid-19 without taking precautions for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores. It just sounds like your leaders are trying to blame China for their own catastrophic mishandling of Covid in their lands.
    3
  10030.  @gulamog5041  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    3
  10031. Actually, many Chinese politicians are engineers, so they focus on building roads, railways, highways, tunnels etc in China.
    3
  10032. 我觉得政治没有永远的朋友是真事，但是中巴友谊就是最真诚、最纯粹的友谊关系。破了就是可惜得很～
    3
  10033.  @nuwa1737  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    3
  10034. +J17 "Not to mention most of the work is done China’s own people," China is building roads, railways, highways, bridges, etc, and not every local worker is qualified to build those infrastructures. In the China-Pakistan economic corridor project for example, Pakistan has insufficient engineers and not enough cement to build the infrastructure themselves. Therefore, Pakistan government is training more engineers in its universities and doubling cement production to meet the demands of the project. 1,000 Pakistani students to be trained in China under CPEC gulfnews.com/news/asia/pakistan/1-000-pakistani-students-to-be-trained-in-china-under-cpec-ccc-1.2245028 Encouraged by CPEC, Pakistan’s cement industry to increase capacity thenews.com.pk/latest/208193-Encouraged-by-CPEC-Pakistans-cement-industry-to-increase-capacity-by-56pc-report In the meantime, Chinese engineers bring in Chinese workers and cement from overseas to help lay the foundations for the project, while Pakistan trains more engineers and increase cement production. In the future, when Pakistan has sufficient manpower and materials, they can start taking over the construction from Chinese.
    3
  10035.  @alanoh3069  About human-to-human transmission, there was no actual indication of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus back in 2019. The first human-to-human transmission case in China was confirmed only on 20th Jan 2020 and that's when the government began implementing quarantine measures shortly after. Source: China confirms human-to-human transmission of coronavirus theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/20/coronavirus-spreads-to-beijing-as-china-confirms-new-cases (Dated to 21st Jan 2020)
    3
  10036.  @alanoh3069  China actually informed the WHO of a strange new virus on 31st Dec 2019. By 11th Jan 2020, China had sequenced Covid-19 genome and shared the information with WHO for the rest of the world. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html Why did so many countries watch the epidemic unfold for weeks as though it was none of their concern?
    3
  10037.  @jonathanhe7676  Opinion polls in Taiwan indicate that only a small minority (5.6%) want independence while the vast majority (87%) of people polled want to maintain the status quo. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China, and any move to declare independence would be considered changing the status quo. A move that the majority of the people polled in Taiwan do not want.
    3
  10038. It's known internationally as the South China Sea, not the West Philippines Sea. Also, the maritime boundary of Philippines is drawn up in the 1898 Treaty of Paris, which DOES NOT include the South China Sea Islands as within Philippines territory. (Source: Wikipedia: File: Ph boundary in Treaty of Paris 1898)
    3
  10039.  @mr.supermanbatman6894  Who said that the International Court of Justice in the Hague had ruled over the South China Sea dispute?
    3
  10040. The U.S leaders have no idea how to solve domestic problems like inflation, gun control, healthcare, etc, so they focus on foreign policy instead.
    3
  10041.  @bbharatillusion4574  Agreed. The U.S wars in the Middle East resulting in mass immigration of refugees to EU, resulting in social problems.
    3
  10042. +Parm Mohan China only has a single overseas base in Djibouti, Africa, whereas USA has 400+ military bases in Okinawa Japan, South Korea, Philippines, etc. so which country is militarizing here? Wikipedia: List of countries with overseas military bases wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_overseas_military_bases
    3
  10043.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou You are the only Chinese person who suggests bringing back the imperial system." All I said was that China has always been ruled by a strong central government for our entire history that's all.
    3
  10044.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "China is a totalitarian state but USA government has checks and balances." What "checks and balances" led to the election of Trump as POTUS in 2016?
    3
  10045.  @Andy-P  "州 Shenzhou So far economic history has shown that societies have to become pluralistic and have independent inclusive institutions to maintain economic progress once an economy reaches a certain stage." Disagree. Taiwan for example, was One of the Four Asian Tigers/Dragons and its economy flourished under the authoritarian single-party rule of the Kuomintang. Chiang Kai-shek was a dictator who exiled or executed dissenters and political rivals in a period known as White Terror. The KMT even imposed martial law on Taiwan for 38 years which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Yet under the KMT rule, Taiwan's economy flourished, resulting in the "Taiwan Miracle". However, in the 1990s, after democracy was introduced, Taiwan's economy has stagnated. Wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are seeking employment opportunities outside of the island, in places like Singapore or mainland China.
    3
  10046.  @Andy-P  China has never mentioned anything about decoupling, it's the west that keeps on emphasising the word decouple. And it's the U.S that's banning chip technology to China so how exactly is China following the path of North Korean model? Could you please explain how?
    3
  10047.  @Andy-P  You said: "But those countries are still successful while they became democracies." The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is a successful country that is able to deliver economic growth, yet it has never adopted Western-style democracy, it's still under a monarchy. It's clearly not true that a country has to become democratic to become successful, and I've cited several examples already.
    3
  10048.  @Andy-P  I don't understand why you claim China is following an economic model that's looks more like the path of the North Korean model. China is the world's 2nd largest economy (world's largest if you go by GDP by PPP) so how is this even comparable? Where did you get such an idea? Could you please explain your way of thinking?
    3
  10049.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou China has looked to de-couple from western technology for a long time and be self reliant." But again, how does that translate into China's economic model becoming more like the North Korea's? Many other countries also seek to decouple from China. In fact, this word "decoupling" is often thrown around in the media coming from the West regarding China.
    3
  10050.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou I thought all property in China was on a 70 year lease from the Government?" Yeah, but you can renew the lease after it has expired. China's Property Rights Law Article 149 states that when the 70-year term for the land-use right for residential purposes expires, the term will automatically renew.
    3
  10051.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou Apart from when it wasn't. Warring states period ect..."_ Even during the Warring States period, the individual states were all governed under authoritarian rule of their respective kings. Naturally, after China was unified, this system expanded to encompass all of China.
    3
  10052.  @Andy-P  "Having independent inclusive institutions is a good sign of a pluralistic society." But as I've already argued above, not all countries have to become pluralistic and have independent inclusive institutions to maintain economic progress. Saudi Arabia is a prime example.
    3
  10053.  @Andy-P  You said: "China is the country that keeps the most and gives the least to households." What Chinese government gives to households is more than just household incomes alone. The government offers to economic development, better infrastructure, educational opportunities and better quality of living, all of whom cannot be measured in terms of household incomes alone.
    3
  10054.  @barryford1482  "神州 Shenzhou I've met some Chinese people in Canberra They call themselves Falong Gong" Falun Dafa was founded in 1992 by a man named Li Hongzhi, by hijacking existing practices from Buddhism, Taoism, and traditional Chinese qigong practices. This should already sound off alarm bells that Falun Gong is actually a cult in disguise. The Falun Gong followers believe that their leader Li possesses the supernatural power to cure all ailments and none are allowed to question his purported supernatural powers. Mr. Li claims to know "the top secret of the universe" and says "no religion can save people" but the "almighty Fa," which he exclusively represents. He is therefore essentially the chosen savior of man. The biography in his book "Zhuan Falun" claims that he first recognized his special powers at the age of 8. Li Hongzhi's teachings also include the spinning "falun," which is a mystical "wheel of law" that he claims to be able to insert into his disciples' abdomens telekinetically. Falun Dafa followers, believe that Li Hongzhi is always right and they are not allowed to question the basic assumptions concerning his purported supernatural powers, teachings and/or opinions. His authority and infallibility appear to be absolute for the true believer, and therefore beyond what Falun Dafa followers consider reasonable doubt.
    3
  10055. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Russophobia and Sinophobia in the West against Russia and China. And it's driving both countries closer together than we've ever been.
    3
  10056.  @Closeoutracer  "Mao of China murdered 70 Million of his own countrymen between 1946-1960" China's population in 1950 was 544,112,923, and by 1960, China's population had soared to 644,450,173, (having increased by 100,337,250) So you're saying China's population fell by 70 million, yet the entire population actually increased by 100 million? Source: populationpyramid.net/china/1950/ Where did you get such exaggerated death toll figures?
    3
  10057.  @Carbuncle0168  "president Xi agreed to allow Taiwan to become an independent country" If that's true then where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? If not then since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    3
  10058.  @Carbuncle0168  You said: "China is weak country because of CCP Dictatorship." On the contrary, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past during the previous Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period. Fast forward till today and the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 has transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army funded by the world's 2nd largest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    3
  10059.  @Carbuncle0168  "China cannot take Taiwan because China have weak army." President Xi Jinping has emphasised peaceful reunification between Taiwan and the mainland. Time is on the mainland's side, as long as Taiwan doesn't declare independence, it will eventually be reintegrated with the rest of China in due time.
    3
  10060.  @ne0ge049  What was your answer to this? U.S General Mark Milley's phonecall reveals that he has authority over even the then US President Trump to make the decision whether to launch nukes and he assured China that USA won't launch nukes against China.
    3
  10061. It's not a Star of David ✡though
    3
  10062. @North Korea Is Best Korea In 1971 the UN countries democratically voted to kick Taiwan out and to recognise the People's Republic of China as China on the security council. We even have the voting results which were 76 in favor, 35 against and 17 abstained. So the UN countries voted to recognise the PRC and kick ROC out of the UN security council.
    3
  10063. @North Korea Is Best Korea The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the UN General Assembly Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The vote results were: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained ... Source: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 Since the PRC won the vote with two thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, recognized the People's Republic of China (PRC) as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" from the United Nations. So the UN countries democratically voted to recognize PRC as China and to kick Taiwan out.
    3
  10064. @North Korea Is Best Korea Check out UN General Resolution 2758 it's the UN countries that democratically voted to recognise PRC as China and kicked Taiwan out of the UN. The voting results were: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained
    3
  10065. @North Korea Is Best Korea It's hugely embarrassing for you that you are unable to refute my points, so you resort to belittling me by calling me "kid".
    3
  10066.  @ayi3455  So the World Health Organization has since given a name for the coronavirus as COVID-19, then why can't China go with the proper name? Even your Indonesian governor of Jakarta used the correct name Covid-19 isn't it?
    3
  10067.  @ayi3455  Look at all those racially-motivated attacks against Asian Americans (Asian Canadians, Asian Australians, Asian Europeans, etc) because American politicians like Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo choose to refer to the virus by it's improper name. Video: Asian Americans face discrimination in wake of the coronavirus youtu.be/t_IyTxRNUYk Yet you want to continue this racism against Asians by continuing to use the improper name for Covid-19?
    3
  10068.  @gulamog5041  You're the one making a racist caricature by comparing an Asian man, President Xi Jinping to a yellow tone bear with small eyes, can't you see your racist behaviour?
    3
  10069. Aniruddh Joshi Same thing with Bhutan, just because Bhutan say its their territory, doesn't mean its theirs. CPEC is agreement between Pakistan and China to build infrastructure in Pakistan controlled territories in Kashmir. Its been under Pakistan control for almost 70 years, and India has not made any more advances to reclaim it. Just like what you said, just because India says its their territory, doesn't necessarily mean its theirs.
    3
  10070. China seeks win-win cooperation, while the US only sees a zero sum game.
    3
  10071.  @apfelfreund6859  China release those dam waters to divert the massive flooding. Source: China Blasts Dam To Divert Massive Flooding That Has Killed At Least 25 nypost.com/2021/07/15/white-house-flagging-posts-for-facebook-to-censor-due-to-covid-19-misinformation/
    3
  10072. USA: "China will take over the infrastructure it builds in your country. Trust me!" Also, USA: "Panama Canal was built by the USA, it belongs to America!"
    3
  10073. Black Mirror is only fictional and it does not necessarily mean real life will be like that.
    3
  10074. But _Black Mirror is fictional and was written for entertainment purposes, so how can it raise valid concerns when its not rooted in reality?
    3
  10075. bowlsallbroken You can consider Black Mirror an entry point, but in the end, it is not necessarily the conclusive point.
    3
  10076.  The Hate Factory  I can speak both English and Mandarin, yet you're accusing me of being part of the 50¢ army?
    3
  10077.  @peorakef  "神州 Shenzhou "taiwan is part of china" I didn't deny that, why don't you answer me?" Did I ever said that you deny Taiwan is part of China? And many other provinces in China did way better than Taiwan (like Fujian province) even though it's under the mainland government, so does this answer your question? Since you agree that Taiwan is part of China, then shouldn't you be comparing Taiwan to other provinces of the mainland?
    3
  10078.  @peorakef  "The ROC is independent from the PRC, it has control over the island of Taiwan&c. And it doesn't oppress its people." Where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence then? Who signed it and when was it signed? When is Taiwan's independence day? If not, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. What makes you seem to think mainlanders are oppressed? Mainlanders are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese mainland tourists visiting other countries and spending money on their economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in other country's lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more
    3
  10079.  @peorakef  You can't answer my question so you start talking nonsensical rhymes? You clearly aren't interested in logical debate since you can't refute my points. I mean, where is Taiwan's formal declaration of independence of you claim it's independent? When is Taiwan's independence day? If not, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China.
    3
  10080. Many tourists and short-term visitors to China are relunctant to use mobile payment, because it requires setting up a Chinese bank account to link to your WeChat wallet. China is rolling out Digital Renminbi that allows tourists and short-term visitors to use mobile payment platforms without the need for setting up a Chinese bank account.
    3
  10081. ​ @joelturley4847  Russia never said anything about taking Kiev in 3 days. That deadline was artificially imposed.
    3
  10082. Peng Shuai is trying to lay low and avoid the public eye for a while until this all blows over, and she has expressed her desire for personal privacy during a video call with IOC. But the WTA is trying to pry into her personal affairs and demanding she appear in public and bare her private life for all the world to see.
    3
  10083. +Bruce Leroy said "If you do not like Donald Trump fine, many of us Americans did not vote for him, but Russian hackers got him elected anyways." That exposes a major flaw in the system. Your system is vulnerable to outside influence. Why is many Americans did not vote for Trump, yet Trump ended up in the White House? This is your problem for you to deal with, and its your system you choose to follow. At least China's system isn't vulnerable to outside influence isn't it? "Now China wants to take indepentant rights from the people of HongKong corrupting elections and killing protesters in the streets of HongKong." Hong Kong elections are all voted by people of HK, so how did China corrupt those elections? Which mainland Chinese person voted in HK ellections? And which protesters have been killed in the streets of HK? As far as I know, its the Hong Kong Police Force themselves that deals with the protestors in HK, not the mainland Chinese police force.
    3
  10084. The tyrant-being-overthrown-by-revolution system may appear deadly, but it has served well China for 3000 years. Look at democracies like the Athen Democracy, or Spartan Democracy, or Roman Republic. Eventually they all collapsed and Rome is no longer the empire it once was today. Not to mention most of the ancient world countries were ruled by a small but powerful group of people, whether its the nobles (aristocracy), priests (theocracy), kings and emperors (monarchy). This is because such people tend to be well-educated and are qualified to make important decisions regarding the future of the country. Otherwise, why did most of the ancient world follow such a system?
    3
  10085. +Jon Z To answer your question, China has 8 other political parties besides the communist party of China and they are: 1. Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang (RCCK) 中国国民党革命委员会 (民革) 2. China Democratic League (CDL) 中国民主同盟 (民盟) 3. China Democratic National Construction Association (CDNCA) 中国民主建国会 (民建) 4. China Association for Promoting Democracy (CAPD) 中国民主促进会 (民进) 5. Chinese Peasants' and Workers' Democratic Party (CPWDP) 中国农工民主党 (农工党) 6. China Zhi Gong Party (CZGP) 中国致公党 (致公党) 7. Jiusan Society (JS) 九三学社 8. Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League (TDSGL) 台湾民主自治同盟 (台盟)
    3
  10086. Bruce Leroy I have never said China is stronger than America as a nation. But China has the world's 2nd largest economy, PLA is the world's largest land army, as well as the world's 2nd largest military budget. All this, despite not being a Western democracy. It goes to show that not every country has to adopt Western democracy to be successful, and China is living proof of that. Although the system does not encourage critical thinking, China is slowly making progress in terms of innovation and creativity. For example, according to Global Innovation Index of the most innovative countries in the world: China was ranked 29th in 2015. China was ranked 25th in 2016 China was ranked 22th in 2017 China is ranked 17th in 2018. Source:.globalinnovationindex (dot) org/analysis-indicator Following this trend, China could possibly become among the top 15 most innovative countries by 2020, and possibly top 10 by 2030.
    3
  10087. +Wanton Entanglement You can always come to Wuxi, Jiangsu province of China and check out China's supercomputer for yourself if you don't believe me. China also built the world's largest radio telescope, the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST) that has been nicknamed Tianyan 天眼 ("Eye of the Heavens") that will help scientists learn more about the universe's early days, detect low-frequency gravitational waves and hunt for signals that may have been produced by distant alien civilizations. The larger the radio dish, the more sensitive it is and FAST's potential to discover an alien civilization will be 5 to 10 times that of current equipment, as it can see farther and darker planets. China Finishes Building World's Largest Radio Telescope Source:space(dot)com/33357-china-largest-radio-telescope-alien-life.html
    3
  10088.  @thevirusfactory2332  Adrian Zenz is the new Joseph Goebbels.
    3
  10089.  The Snurger  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    3
  10090.  The Snurger  Why not attempt to refute my points instead of hurling insults against me for my views?
    3
  10091.  @stoggafllik  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    3
  10092.  The Snurger  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    3
  10093.  @haroldshipman5419  Chairman Mao killed 100 million? China's population in 1950s was around 500 million, so you're saying that China lost 20% of our population? Then why is China currently the country with the world's largest population at 1.4 billion people?
    3
  10094.  @emmeadowmitbbs3537  Americans need to understand that their problems stem from the crooks at Wall Street, Hollywood, the CIA, and worst of all, the Military Industrial Complex. These organizations have tried one way or the other to redirect the cause for America's woes towards immigrants, to people of colour and to China and Russia.
    3
  10095.  @MarkYeung1  Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV should hire more native English speakers that truly understand the Western mindset and how to put China's message across more coherently to foreign audiences. The problem is that some overseas Chinese tend to have a "colonial mindset" as a result of their upbringing in the West.
    3
  10096.  Albert YK Chen  Young children are (temporary) separated from families, because the Omicron variant is better able to resist children's innate immune response, and the lack of vaccines and boosters for children makes it harder to protect them compared to adults. Furthermore, scientists are unable to ascertain the long-term effects of Covid-19 on children who've contracted the virus. After these kids grow up in the future, who knows what lingering side-effects they might carry into their adult life?
    3
  10097.  @MarkYeung1  So doesn't that mean Canadian government is more authoritarian since they have vaccine mandates unlike mainland China? Furthermore, you said: Governments have a responsibility to keep people safe, but sadly there was 261 deaths in Canada on 13 April due to Covid. Right now, given that the elderly vaccine rate is 62% in Shanghai, the best course of action is still lockdown, to prevent any more unnecessary deaths due to the virus.
    3
  10098.  @MarkYeung1  China does not have a vaccine mandate (unlike Canada forcing seniors to get vaccinated against their will). Also, the priority right now is not immediate vaccination, because they'll only develop antibodies after a few months, so the priority right now in Shanghai is still lockdown.
    3
  10099.  @MarkYeung1  Once again, getting vaccinated doesn't grant you immunity, it's possible to contract the coronavirus even while fully vaccinated. For example, Cyrus Janssen had gotten vaccinated earlier, and yet he still contracted Covid-19. Yet you're constantly throwing around the word immunity when getting vaccinated doesn't equal immunity, please get informed about vaccination.
    3
  10100.  @TheNewGreenIsBlue  "In Canada the elderly have the HIGHEST acceptance rate." Again, that's because the virus is allowed to spread uncontrollably (sadly average of 100 Canadians are dying to Covid every day) that's why elderly see the need to vaccinate. Whereas in China, the Covid-19 situation was under control and that's why many elderly in China do not feel the urgency to vaccinate.
    3
  10101.  @TheNewGreenIsBlue  "Unfortunately, those bonds take time to build... and if you're disconnected from your family physically for a long period of time... those bonds don't form." Chinese culture is such that many elderly take care of our kids, while the parents are away working, and this is what builds the family bonds. If those elderly are gone (because of Covid) then the familial bonds might start to disintegrate. Once again, loss of income is tragic, but money loss can always be earned again. However, lives lost cannot be undone.
    3
  10102.  @TheNewGreenIsBlue  How am I not on the people's side? I clearly said that loss of income is regrettable, but money lost can always be earned again.But the loss of elderly lives cannot be undone.
    3
  10103.  @MarkYeung1  You've been providing incorrect information about vaccination. It takes more than 2 weeks to become fully vaccinated, you still have to wait at least 21-28 days to get the 2nd dose before being becoming fully vaccinated.
    3
  10104.  @TheNewGreenIsBlue  I don't understand why you claim China is only experiencing limited success, when China has controlled the pandemic arguably far better than many Western countries. The number of deaths from Covid in China is only 4k, compared to nearly 40k for Canada.
    3
  10105.  @TheNewGreenIsBlue  "I actually come to Cyrus' channel because his viewpoint is interesting...He's also not China" As much as I like Cyrus' channel too, Cyrus is NOT the Governor of Shanghai, responsible for the lives of 26 million in the city, so what makes you seem to think he could do a better job than the Shanghai governor?
    3
  10106. @Sheriff Lobo Does that mean you are okay with North Korea and Iran obtaining nuclear weapons? Then why is the United States against it, you tell me?
    3
  10107. As for famous Chinese tech companies, apart from dominating smartphones and drones, China has produced many successful Internet companies like JD, Tencent, Alibaba, Suning, Bytedance (Tik Tok), Meituan-Dianping, Baidu, NetEase, Kwai, Pindoudou, Trip Dotcom, Sina Corp, and so on. Source: Wikipedia: List of largest Internet companies But where are the famous companies from Taiwan and Hong Kong to compare with the mainland ? How can Taiwan and Hong Kong possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    3
  10108.  @joshkooga7204  Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself? Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. Whereas many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of their future.
    3
  10109.  @bartonlee3594  The number of people who've stopped paying their mortgages are only in the hundreds. A widely monitored list on the GitHub open source site entitled "We Need Home" showed the number of projects across China whose buyers have joined the boycott at 342 on Sept. 16. The few hundreds that boycott mortgages is a drop in the ocean that is the Chinese property market.
    3
  10110.  @michaelkatz275  What about it? Has this collapse even happened yet? Western journalists have been talking about this all the time, and yet what they've predicted hasn't even come to pass.
    3
  10111. China controls 80-90% of the world's rare earth metals production, which are used in high tech devices, that's why decoupling from China is simply unfeasible, as even Western diplomats have admitted.
    3
  10112. Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous affair with a much older man has been exposed, and she's expressed a desire for personal privacy in a videocall with IOC. But the WTA would have none of that, and they are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see, instead of respecting her wish for privacy
    3
  10113.  @jp95js  You said: "All of this is being done by the CCP without any International Laws allowing it and in a fact International Court ruling that China has no valid legal rights." What "International Court" made that ruling about the South China Seas? The ruling in the South China Seas was made by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which is NOT an official UN agency, it only rents space in the same building as the UN’s International Court of Justice (ICJ) but the two organisations are not related.
    3
  10114.  @jp95js  Many in Hong Kong are suffering from a subservient "colonial mindset". The British may have returned Hong Kong in 1997 and physically decolonized, but "decolonization of the mind" is still ongoing in Hong Kong. More Hong Kong people need to shrug off the mental damage inflicted by the colonizer on the minds of the colonized in order for Hong Kong to begin healing.
    3
  10115.  @jp95js  The International Court of Justice DID NOT RULE in the South China Sea ruling. The so-called "Hague Court" that did the ruling was the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which itself isn't an official UN agency, it only shares the same office space as the ICJ in the Hague, but the two organizations are unrelated. So what "International Court" are you talking about? You are under the impression that it was ICJ that made the ruling in South China Sea, but this is untrue, it was the PCA that did the ruling.
    3
  10116.  @jp95js  Many in Hong Kong are still suffering from the mental damage inflicted by colonization on the mindset of the colonized. The British may have physically left Hong Kong after the 1997 handover, but the subservient colonial mentality of many Hong Kong people still remains. There needs to be further "decolonisation of the mind" in Hong Kong, otherwise Hong Kong people's actions would only serve their former colonial master's interests.
    3
  10117.  @jp95js  Those 100,000 Hong Kong migrants represent a significant loss of skilled and educated people in Hong Kong (similar to how Afghanistan is losing brainpower as Afghan people flee the Taliban) and this forms part of Western countries ploy to create a brain-drain in Hong Kong through mass immigration. In the end, the 100,000 Hong Kong migrants will wound up becoming 2nd-class citizens in Western countries, because many in Hong Kong still suffer from the pernicious effects of subservient "colonial mindset".
    3
  10118.  @jp95js  Cyrus has explained his reasons through his video: Why I Left China After 10 Years....and moved to Canada youtu.be/w7Dw4Tj9sxk (By Cyrus Jannsen)
    3
  10119. I thought humans have already created autonomous weapons in the form of traps and landmines.
    3
  10120.  @sanasananee  Perhaps heat-seeking missiles are considered autonomous then?
    3
  10121.  @deanc6471  You said: "Shenzhou. Completely untrue. Tibet was never a part of China." Look up Yuan Dynasty China Map and Tibet was clearly part of China. Same goes with Qing Dynasty China's Map and Tibet was part of China. Tibet temporarily broke free of China in 1912 but was eventually reunited with the mainland by 1951.
    3
  10122.  @sekainohana  The population of Tibetans in Tibet have increased from 1 million (1952) to 3 million. Tibetans celebrate their culture and festivals (i.e Shoton Festival) in Tibet. The population of Uighurs in Xinjiang have increased by 16% since 2010, and the Uighurs celebrate their culture through Uighur cuisine (i.e Naan flatbread), traditional Uighur clothing, singing and dancing while playing traditional Uighur instruments (i.e Dutar).
    3
  10123.  @zerozatan  Chinese officials aren't "employed" in Europe, they still draw their salaries from China, not Europe.
    3
  10124.  @yslee1401  Have you've heard of Pinkerton Syndrome? It's used to describe the perceived tendency of some Asians to regard Anglo Saxon people as superior or more desirable, and it was first observed in Singapore.
    3
  10125.  Virus Factory  "神州 Shenzhou 👈Hardcore 50 cent army." I didn't even mention anything about the Communist Party of China here in this thread, yet you're accusing me of being a 50 cent army?
    3
  10126. +Jeff Li 别听美媒的话。其实，14世达赖喇嘛在他1991年的自传《流亡中的自在》中，批评中情局“支援西藏独立运动并非因为关心西藏独立，而是颠覆全世界的共产政府行动的一部分”。 (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Criticism ) 1999年，达赖喇嘛说中情局西藏计划对西藏有害，因为目的主要是服务美国的利益。“一旦美国对华政策改变，帮助就停止了。”
    3
  10127. +Crescendyr If UN choose not to send anything then its your fault if you don't put 100% into everything. Look at Vietnam War, USA lost the Vietnam war to the Viet Cong. Look at US wars in the Middle East such as Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, etc, taking more than 16 years. You claim USA is the most powerful army, then which war did USA win on its own? Look, in 2014, Russia had a military intervention in Crimea and annexed it from Ukraine, but all the US did was impose sanctions that's all.
    3
  10128.  @jacwi8719  About debt, China bought an estimated 1.1 trillion dollars ($1,100,000,000,000) worth of U.S debt to help USA tide itself over the 2008 financial crisis. Source: China owns about $1.1 trillion in U.S. debt investopedia.com/articles/investing/080615/china-owns-us-debt-how-much.asp Yet China owning US debt doesn't stop the USA from going against China in the Xinjiang narrative, so what has debt even got to do with that?
    3
  10129. Outwardly, USA expressed support for Japan dumping irradiated Fukushima waters. But inwardly, USA has maintained a ban on imports of farming and seafood products from the region near Fukushima. Yet JaYoe Nation thinks Chinese are just being racist against Japanese, when the real two-faced racist is outwardly supporting Japan's decision, but inwardly banning seafood imports from Fukushima?
    3
  10130.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  China treats our nuclear waste to internationally acceptable safety standards before releasing it. Japan doesn't.
    3
  10131.  @sara.cbc92  We are talking about Japan dumping irradiated water into the sea, but you're resorting to whataboutism?
    3
  10132.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  According to your article: "local fishermen have voiced strong opposition to such plans for fear that Japanese consumers would shun seafood caught nearby. South Korea, which currently bans imports of seafood from the area, has also repeatedly voiced concern about the environmental impact." Does that mean that Japanese fishermen and South Korean government are racist?
    3
  10133.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  No, my first comment on this thread was "Outwardly, USA expressed support for Japan dumping irradiated Fukushima waters. But inwardly, USA has maintained a ban on imports of farming and seafood products from the region near Fukushima. Yet JaYoe Nation thinks Chinese are just being racist against Japanese, when the real two-faced racist is outwardly supporting Japan's decision, but inwardly banning seafood imports from Fukushima?" You did not address the fact that outwardly USA said they support Japan, but inwardly they still ban the imports of seafood from Fukushima regions, that was my original point.
    3
  10134.  @sara.cbc92  You're the one who brought up poison babies with melamine milk and other stuff, then why can't I talk about Unit 731 in another thread? Someone in that comment thread was talking about Japanese wartime atrocities so I simply agreed that's all.
    3
  10135.  @sara.cbc92  If the Japanese were honorable, then why didn't they apologise for the atrocious war-crimes they committed? They enshrine Class-A Japanese war criminals in Yasukuni Shrine where they pay homage to Japanese warriors fallen in battle, if honorable you mean by honoring war criminals then you're just against the victim's of Japanese imperialism.
    3
  10136.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  When did I change the topic? Look at my first comment here: "Outwardly, USA expressed support for Japan dumping irradiated Fukushima waters. But inwardly, USA has maintained a ban on imports of farming and seafood products from the region near Fukushima. Yet JaYoe Nation thinks Chinese are just being racist against Japanese, when the real two-faced racist is outwardly supporting Japan's decision, but inwardly banning seafood imports from Fukushima?" So how did I change the topic? It's you who refuse to address my point that outwardly, USA support Japan, but inwardly they ban seafood from Fukushima region.
    3
  10137.  @sara.cbc92  Look at how you don't even bother to spell "China" correctly, you spell it like how Trump says it on TV. You insult our country then why expect Chinese mainlanders to treat you like a friend when you treat Chinese like enemies? Many foreigners often complain Chinese people spit in public, smoke in non-smoking areas, jump queues, disobey traffic rules, jay walk, drive on wrong side of the road, speed through red lights, etc when not all Chinese people are like that. We Chinese feel embarrassed that such bad people represent China overseas, so the government introduce social credit system to discourage such bad behaviour and promote better behaviour instead. This is a meritocratic system where good behaviour is rewarded and bad behaviour penalised. But if such people persist with bad behaviour, until their scores fall to become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisances of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again.
    3
  10138.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  China is not the only one complaining about Japanese war crimes, even South Korea comfort women (whom are elderly women today) are protesting outside the Japanese embassy for writing comfort women off as "well paid war prostitutes" Video: Japan - S.Korean Comfort Women Protest youtu.be/f4egnXV7PpU Does this make Koreans racist against Japanese too? Like when you accused China? Even Koreans are protesting Japanese releasing nuclear waste into the seas.
    3
  10139.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  So USA choosing to maintain the ban on seafood imports from Fukushima region is also racist?
    3
  10140.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  When did I change the subject? I clearly said "Outwardly, USA expressed support for Japan dumping irradiated Fukushima waters. But inwardly, USA has maintained a ban on imports of farming and seafood products from the region near Fukushima." If you claim China and South Korea are racist, then what about USA continue to ban seafood from Fukushima regions?
    3
  10141.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  Former Filipino comfort women demand apology from Japanese emperor youtu.be/Y3V7hxlzZvs So according to your logic, are you going to claim Filipinos are racist against Japanese, like Chinese and Koreans?
    3
  10142.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  Following suit of Japan's neighboring countries including China, Russia and South Korea, the Philippines is the first Southeast Asian country to express deep concerns over Japan's decision to dump Fukushima wastewater into the sea. Source: Philippines joins concerns over Fukushima water dumping globaltimes.cn/page/202104/1221198.shtml Philippine presidential spokesperson Harry Roque said on Thursday he hopes that nations, including those behind the pollution, would follow the law's principles, and pay for the damage, local media reported. "First principle is we are one ecosystem. Second principle is that we are interconnected and the third principle is that the polluter must pay," he noted. So according to your logic, doesn't that make Philippines racist (like China and South Korea) since they want Japan to pay for dumping irradiated water?
    3
  10143.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  So Philippines express concerns about Japanese dumping irradiated Fukushima waters, isn't that racism according to your logic? Since you accuse China, Russia, South Korea of such?
    3
  10144.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  Philippines joins concerns over Fukushima water dumping globaltimes.cn/page/202104/1221198.shtml Following suit of Japan's neighboring countries including China, Russia and South Korea, the Philippines is the first Southeast Asian country to express deep concerns over Japan's decision to dump Fukushima wastewater into the sea. Philippine presidential spokesperson Harry Roque said on Thursday he hopes that nations, including those behind the pollution, would follow the law's principles, and pay for the damage, local media reported.
    3
  10145.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  So USA did not lift their ban on imports of seafood from Fukushima regions, doesn't that mean that USA is racist?
    3
  10146.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  So according to you, China, Russia and South Korea are racist, then haven't you noticed that our countries are geographically closest to Fukushima and more likely to be impacted by Japanese releasing irradiated waters into the sea? Vietnam, Indonesia Philippines are in South East Asia but located further from Fukushima than Russia, China and South Korea. But Philippines is the first Southeast Asian country to express deep concerns over Japan's decision to dump Fukushima wastewater into the sea. Yet you're calling our countries racist just because we are located closer to Fukushima than other countries?
    3
  10147.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  The Philippines removed the ban on seafood from Fukushima, but USA did not remove the seafood ban from Fukushima, so by your logic, the USA is racist, is that right? Since USA didn't remove the ban?
    3
  10148.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  So Philippines express concerns about Japanese dumping irradiated Fukushima waters, doesn't that mean they are racist according to your logic? Since USA ban seafood from Fukushima regions, doesn't that mean USA is racist too?
    3
  10149.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  So Philippines express concerns about Japanese dumping irradiated Fukushima waters, that's racist took isn't it? And USA maintain ban on seafood imports from Fukushima region, that means you agree that USA is racist too?
    3
  10150.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  So you admitted that Philippines and USA are racist towards Japan because Philippines express concerns about Japanese dumping irradiated Fukushima waters and USA maintain their ban on imports of seafood from Fukushima regions right? Then why don't you just say so?
    3
  10151.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  I showed you that Philippines showed concern over Japan's decision to dump Fukushima wastewater into the sea, then you accused China, Russia, South Korea as racist, means you agree that Philippines is racist. Then you bring up Philippines allowing Fukushima seafood, but USA ban on Fukushima seafood remains, so doesn't that mean USA is racist too?
    3
  10152. +Alpha Omega You missed to context of my post. China and Russia have wars with our immediate neighbors, whereas USA is fighting wars halfway across the globe, in Vietnam, Korean, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, etc, and US troops are dying on foreign soil, far from home. Why? Is the US mainland in any real danger from across the Pacific Ocean? Are US soldiers dying for their homeland? War is bad, and there are no winners, only losers.
    3
  10153. +X x That's the problem with USA, that the corporations control the government. Americans themselves always lament how the US corporations control the US government. Whereas in China, our companies are mostly state-owned so its the other way round, where the government controls the corporations. By doing so, China is able to point our companies in directions to help make China great, whereas in US corporate controlled system, the corporations are all about profit and not truly making America great again.
    3
  10154. The Chinese government has shown to be willing to make amends to the constitution, if it would benefit China. Why aren't Americans willing to do the same thing to their constitution for benefit of America? The loose gun laws in US are resulting mass school shootings by armed gunmen, but stricter gun laws can't be implemented, because Americans refuse to surrender their right to bear firearms.
    3
  10155. NewYorkCityViews China has world's largest population, so with such a large student population, competition for top schools and higher education is fierce and intense in China. Students that don't pass local university entrance examinations (Gaokao 高考) here may choose to study abroad in other countries as international students. Even if they graduate here in China, they may not be able to get a job here, so they may work overseas as foreign workers in your countries. Also, there are some wealthy Chinese who get filthy rich in China through corruption, and escape to other countries to buy up property, so the money can't be trace back to them, during the anti-corruption crackdown. There are many more reasons why Chinese go overseas to cover here.
    3
  10156. As Chinese citizen myself, I actually wanted Trump to win his 2020 re-election over Biden. Another 4 more years of Trump!
    3
  10157.  @stopwarstop7334  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    3
  10158.  @zackk4969  Did you hear what Mike Pompeo said about the CIA? He said: "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole..."
    3
  10159. +Lucas Muller If they support ROC ideologically, then why did they kick ROC out of UN? Vietnam is also socialist/communist country, but it is still part of UN, so what has ideology got to do with this? Mind you, ROC was kicked out of UN long before China became economic power too.
    3
  10160. Indeed. And the Chinese Dream is about the rejuvenation of the Chinese civilization and returning China back to our former global status before 1840.
    3
  10161.  @piskor2001  "TAIWAN IS country" Actually, if you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar (Burma), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a Map of all the territory Taiwan claims (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg )
    3
  10162.  @少棠丁  So you haven't been to the mainland, yet you seemingly assume that the people under the Communist Party of China rule are unstable and will possibly overthrow the government? According to a recent study by Harvard University and Ash Centre, it has been revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    3
  10163.  @Legacy241  Who said that China destroyed our history? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty China and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history, why should we give updates our ancestral lands? Because you foreigners say so? Source: Map of Yuan Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/04/yuan.jpg Source: Map of Qing Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/06/f114660d2bf5452994135c4c.gif So Tibet was part of China for longer than America's entire colonial history, why should China give up our ancestral lands? China don't want war, but that doesn't mean that China is afraid of war. If America continually attempts to wage trade war and tech war with China and constantly paint China as "the enemy" then why should China quietly accept USA judging China?
    3
  10164.  @Legacy241  The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Source: Seventeen Point Agreement wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. As for Taiwan, go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. And what makes you think Chinese culture is gone? Chinese celebrate many historical festivals such as Spring Festival (Chinese New Year), Lantern Festival, Qingming (Grave Sweeping) Festival, Dragonboat Festival, Double Seventh (Chinese Valentines Day) Festival, Mid-autumn Festival, and so on. Here's some video of Chinese festivals in China. Video: Dragon Boat Races Celebrate China's Ancient Past | National Geographic youtu.be/YlPExNPyPwQ Video: Lantern Festival celebrated across China youtu.be/XnXzQ-p-DpY Video: How modern Chinese celebrate the Qingming Festival youtu.be/mFGYrPNXaLg So what makes you claim Chinese history and culture is destroyed?
    3
  10165.  @Legacy241  "神州 Shenzhou Yeah… you should read that agreement…it was forced." According to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid. Source: Seventeen Point Agreement: Repudiation of the agreement wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement#Repudiation_of_the_agreement "Their feeling of duress derives from the general Chinese threat to use military force again in Central Tibet if an agreement was not concluded. However, according to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid." —Tibetologist Melvyn Goldstein
    3
  10166.  @Legacy241  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    3
  10167. He won't be able to tout Israel as the Jewish State if that happens.
    3
  10168. Russia is several steps ahead and shaping the board in this chess game. In chess, if you don't choose your moves wisely, then your opponent will choose them for you, forcing you to react to their moves.
    3
  10169.  @NoComplience  Where's your source? According to Trading Economics, Foreign investment flows into China increased to CNY 580.19 billion in January-August of 2024 from around CNY 500 billion in the previous period.
    3
  10170.  @laserraiset3300  If America have better living than China, then why is it China's life expectancy at birth has surpassed that of the USA? Chinese are expected to live longer than Americans, so who's living better?
    3
  10171. Han Chinese are among the world's most practical, most intelligent and diligent peoples with long history and culture. Look at people stereotyping Chinese as hardworking, smart, cunning, thrifty, good at math and making excellent businessmen. Why not impart some of these positive traits to Uighur through education and training them in skills necessary for the workplace? Even Vietnam benefited greatly from Han Chinese, such as learning to grow rice, making rice noodles, using chopsticks, using Asian straw hat to shelter against the weather, etc.
    3
  10172. +Hoàng Nguyên Whenever did Han Chinese want to enforce Han culture across Asia? The Japanese were the arrogant ones who invaded China, Korea, Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore, etc, and impose Japanese culture onto those countries, but when did China do the same things? For example, the Chinese Language is only considered an official language in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore (because of Chinese living in Singapore) but no where else in Asia (or in the rest of the world) is Chinese language being forced onto natives, so why you claim Chinese want to enforce Han culture across Asia?
    3
  10173. Agreed. Singapore has been governed by authoritarian single-party PAP for their entire life, for 55 years. Similar to how China's been governed by authoritarian single-party CPC for 71 years.
    3
  10174. Many Filipinos tend to have "colonial mentality" which is defined as the perception of ethnic and cultural inferiority as a result of colonization. Colonial mentality is the worshipping of Anglo Saxon culture while harboring a disdain for any "non-white" culture, including their own.
    3
  10175. China should follow our own path to success, not just blindly emulate the West. If a leader is good and capable enough to stay in power for longer, then I personally see no reason not to extend his term in order to implement his policies. Long term strategic plans, like Belt and Road Initiative span the course of several terms, in order to be fully realized, so we can't have some other leader just being appointed and suddenly abolishing OBOR just like that.
    3
  10176. United States: "China will take over the infrastructure it builds in your country. Trust me!" Also, United States: "Panama Canal was built by the USA, it belongs to America!"
    3
  10177. Taiwan claims an even larger area (11-Dash Line) of the South China Sea as compared to mainland China (9 Dash Line), so you're saying the Philippines support Taiwan's claim to the 11 Dash Line?
    3
  10178. Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. Yet people still continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for over 30 years already.
    3
  10179.  @tutuluvable  "I think the 神州person is a falungong cult practitioner. " What makes you think that? I'm against Falungong, to me it's a cult created in 1992 by Li Hongzhi, hijacking existing practices from Taoism, Buddhism, and traditional Chinese Qigong practices. If I wanted to practice those religions, I would just go straight to learn from Taoists, Buddhists and Qigong practitioners themselves. But what leads you to the idea that I'm a Falungong cultist?
    3
  10180.  @fclopez1  "A man in China was arrested for using VPN to browse Wikipedia." Was he using illegal VPN providers? As long as you use government-approved VPN providers, then no one will come arrest you just for login into Wikipedia while in China.
    3
  10181.  @mojito4493  Why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan.
    3
  10182.  @mojito4493  You said: "buy from Taiwanese 🇹🇼 don't buy from CCP communism fake china" Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    3
  10183.  @fclopez1  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    3
  10184. Nury Vittachi is a gem. He is a reminder that many ordinary people have just been taught to become anti-China through Western MSM, and that it's possible for them to wake up to the awareness of the geopolitical game.
    3
  10185. Indian government knows that once Bhutan accepts this deal, Indian troops no longer have any reason to be present at Doklam/Donglong, and will be forced to withdraw.
    3
  10186. +Scarlet Despair said "(China) violating every single rules of the WTO" USA and EU have seen more WTO dispute cases than China. According to WTO website: United States of America: 124 cases as complainant, 163 cases as respondent European Union: 99 cases as complainant, 91 cases as respondent China: 22 cases as complainant, 42 cases as respondent Source: WTO disputes by country wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_by_country_e.htm So how is China violating every single rules of WTO? In fact, Donald Trump just unilaterally slapping tariffs on steel and aluminum doesn't even go through the proper WTO channels.
    3
  10187.  @MarkYeung1  As for Prigozhin, he was the head of Wagner mercenary group (that was criticised by the West for recruiting prisoners into its ranks) and he later started a mutiny by leading troops and tanks towards Moscow. Putin forgave him and had him sent to Belarus.
    3
  10188.  @MarkYeung1  According to Bloomberg, Veteran Russian pro-democracy politician Grigory Yavlinsky decided against running in the upcoming presidential race in which Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to secure a crushing victory. He would only consider running if he got 10 million signatures to support his candidacy, but only has about 1 million, Yavlinsky said in an interview to an online program run by independent journalists on YouTube.
    3
  10189.  @MarkYeung1  Veteran Russian pro-democracy politician Grigory Yavlinsky decided against running in the upcoming presidential race in which Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to secure a crushing victory. Yavlinsky, 71, the three-time candidate, won’t take part in the election. He would only consider running if he got 10 million signatures to support his candidacy, but only has about 1 million. Source: Bloomberg
    3
  10190.  @Dave-bf2lc  What has the time Zelenskyy's been in office even got to do with the fact that Zelenskyy has banned all opposition in Ukraine? As I've stated before, there were 3 other candidates apart from Putin to vote for on the Russian ballot paper. Whereas it looks like Ukraine won't be holding any elections, and Zelenskyy's term as President of Ukraine would expire on 20th May.
    3
  10191. ​ @Dave-bf2lc  You asked: "Where is Nemtsov? Where is Navalny?" Boris Nemtsov was assassinated by Anzor Gubashev and Zaur Dadaev, both originating from the Northern Caucasus. Alexei Navalny died from a blood clot.
    3
  10192.  @this.is.our.family.in.quebec  Could you show us this "empirical evidence" of which you speak? The fact remains that Russia has successfully completed its elections, in which there were 3 other candidates*apart from Putin to vote for on the ballot paper. Whereas Zelenskyy term as president is due to expire on 20th May. Yet he refuses to hold elections in Ukraine, and has instead banned the opposition parties. Yavlinsky and Navalny have each gotten single digit approval (as I've shown above). According to Bloomberg, Yavlinsky decided against running in the upcoming presidential due to receiving insufficient signatures of support (1 million instead of 10 million). Navalny died of a blood clot. Could you show us the empirical evidence which prove all of these statements wrong?
    3
  10193. Canada made an enemy of China by detaining Huawei CFO. Canada made an enemy of Russia by imposing sanctions. Canada made an enemy of India by expelling their diplomats. Singlehandedly making themselves the enemy of BRICS in the process.
    3
  10194.  @Dale697  "How successful is BRI around the world?? " 150 countries across the world have applied to join China's Belt and Road Initiative. BRI is a long term project that will take decades to see success, yet we are already seeing the success of BRI in countries like Laos. The Laos-China High Speed Railway has transported over 1 million passengers and 500,000 tonnes of cargo in the year 2021. In 2023, the railway had an annual ridership of 3.1 million passengers. You said: "And not to forget all these countries ows huge Debt to china where they had to even lease their infrastructure, lands, ports to china.(basically selling ur country for period of time)." Sri Lanka's Hambantota port was leased to Chinese companies to develop for 99 years. But after 99 years, the lease would have expired, and the port returned to Sri Lanka, and the debt considered repaid. So in the long term, leasing the port benefits Sri Lanka because it frees them from having to repay debt annually for 99 years.
    3
  10195.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  Clearly, you don't understand what is anecdotal evidence. You have a father in the military, of course the father will boast about all the good things that he's done in the service of the nation. Every father wants to appear the best in his children's eyes. All those ugly stuff, he will neglect to mention because it will ruin his reputation in front of his kids. At least I draw my source from different viewpoints, whereas all you've done is repeated what your ex-military father told you that's all.
    3
  10196.  @Faceless-Patriote  China had 25 border talks with Bhutan. All 25 talks ended in failure to resolve the border dispute with Bhutan. How is the border talk reduced to just "give this take that"? Why China spend so much time talking with Bhutan if China was as aggressive as you claim China to be? (Same goes for India. China has had 30th rounds of border talks with India. All 30 border talks ended in failure to resolve the border dispute.) You said: "No! We know what you want, you want the quickest access to the Ocean" Bhutan is landlocked, how does settling our border dispute with Bhutan grant China the quickest access to the ocean you tell me?
    3
  10197.  makethman574  Which so-called "debt trap diplomacy" has China forgiving 23 loans for 17 African countries, after already cancelling $3.4 billion and restructuring $15 billion of debt from those countries? How's that for "debt-trap" when China is forgiving loans in South Asia and Africa? Also, Bhutan allows Indian embassy even after Sikkim's annexation into India. But when it comes to China, Bhutan perceives China as expansionist just because Tibet was reunified with the mainland? As for free will, of course the world is aware of Chinese citizens, who are free to travel overseas for work, study or pleasure. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending coin on your tourist industry. Your schools and universities have plenty of Chinese international students studying the same topics as their local peers. And Chinese companies are expanding overseas and bringing Chinese products to the rest of the world, of course everyone has heard of China. But in contrast, how many have heard of Bhutan's free will, when India is granted permission to control Bhutan's foreign policy?
    3
  10198. China also has up to date military technologies such as combat UAVs like the CaiHong-5, that has often been compared to the USA's Reaper drone.
    3
  10199.  @iz1287  Look at prosperous Shenzhen in the mainland, just across from Hong Kong and Shenzhen’s economic growth surpassed Hong Kong's in 2017. Source: Shenzhen surpasses US$338 billion GDP mark in 2017, beats Hong Kong and Singapore’s growth scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2128310/shenzhen-88-cent-hi-tech-growth-roll-hit-y2tr-2017 Shenzhen is roughly the same economic size as Singapore and Hong Kong, recorded nominal output of 2.2 trillion yuan (US$338 billion) in 2017 thanks to its booming hi-tech sector. Over 40% of the output came from “innovative” businesses such as internet, biotech and telecom. And this is in spite of Shenzhen being under communist party rule, while Hong Kong is suffering under its own democratic government rule.
    3
  10200.  @iz1287  The existence of the nail houses shows that not all residents are forced to move. What more needs to be said? You want China to be held back by people who refuse modernise?
    3
  10201.  @iz1287  Carrie Lam specifically called those Hong Kong rioters who resort to violence, vandalism, hurling petrol bombs, breaking building windows, security cameras, traffic lights, and damaging HK MTR stations, as rioters. Which by definition, they are.
    3
  10202.  @tjena5772  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    3
  10203. Although the Internet should be theoretically immune to breakdown, there is still a possibility of some cosmic electromagnetic wave (possibly emanating from our Sun itself) reaching the Earth and wrecking havoc on our electronics worldwide.
    3
  10204.  @Gnomezonbacon  Tiananmen Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According to Gregory Clark, the many witnesses there at the time say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    3
  10205. +Arlen Tsao Still, most of the world failed to recognize Taiwan as independent, so what's the point of having an unofficial recognition? It was UN's choice to kick Taiwan out of the UN Security Council back in 1971, and to recognize PRC as China. Those UN countries themselves voted to kick Taiwan out. And compare what Taiwan and China achieved. China today is the world's 2nd largest economy, the PLA is the world's largest land army and 2nd largest military budget. China is the 3rd country in the world to send people to space (during Shenzhou-7 mission) , China has landed lunar rovers (Chang'E) on the Moon, and China even built and launched spacestations (Tiangong-1 and -2) into orbit But what world recognition has Taiwan achieved?
    3
  10206. China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land, and still have surplus food for export. China is home to the world's largest pig farms and sheep farms. China's fishing industry alone makes up 2/3 of the world's fishing industry, and our fish farms make up 1/3 of the world's total aquaculture. China has become a well-known food exporter and many countries buy Chinese agricultural products. In science and technology, China publish more research papers in the world than even USA. China built supercomputers like Sunway Taihulight 神威·太湖之光 all without US chips. Supercomputers help scientists solve complex and tedious equations required to further their research. China builds world’s fastest supercomputer without U.S. chips Source: computerworld.com/article/3085483/high-performance-computing/china-builds-world-s-fastest-supercomputer-without-u-s-chips.html China is also home to the world's largest high speed railway network, more than the rest of the world combined. During Chinese New Year, people used to take many days to return to their home province, but thanks to hi-speed rail, the journey now takes hours, instead of days.
    3
  10207. Arlen Tsao said "Taiwan has achieved far more than your rotten Mainland...Taiwan has one of the highest tech in the world" China is becoming a major leader in Robotics, Automation and Artificial Intelligence. China opened Asia’s first automated container terminal, at Port of Qingdao, China. China's drone industry is rapidly growing and we even produced military drones (like Caihong UAV series) that can rival some of USA's combat drones. China's Jialong 蛟龙 submersible has the greatest depth range of any manned research vehicle in the world.
    3
  10208.  @bobsmith3983  Precisely. Yet that myth persists till today. Because of Western interest in keeping it alive to use it against the CPC.
    3
  10209. +Global Thinker +nn bhardwaj China builds infrastructure and roads to help develop the economies of other less developed countries, like Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and South Africa. -In Pakistan, China has $60 million dollar CPEC deal to build modern transportation networks, ports, energy projects to power Pakistan's economic growth. -In 2009 China lent $10 billion to Kazakhstan to develop its industries. -In 2007, China began construction of a 770-kilometre railway connecting the Tibetan capital of Lhasa with the Nepalese border town of Khasa, connecting Nepal to China's wider national railway network, as part of Qinghai railway. -China loaned Nepal $7 billion dollars for construction of port in Hambantota. -China has offered to construct nuclear power plants in Bangladesh to help power its economy. -China has also build many roads, railways, schools, hospitals and hotels in Africa. In short, China's dream is to make Asia and Africa strong, by building roads and helping these economies develop strong, stable economies. But India is against building of such roads, and constantly poses an obstacle to Asia's economic growth. What is India's dream of a growing Asia then? For poorly developed countries to remain poor forever? China does not follow USA's method of building 700+ military bases in other countries, but to develop economic links with countries so that prosperity can be shared. How do Indians expect Asia to rise at all, if we aren't even allowed to build roads?
    3
  10210. +gana premi Yes indeed, Chinese people have set up "Chinatowns" in major cities in our various colonies of the world. Even in colonial America, Chinese workers worked hard to build roads and railways to pave the way for modern America. But why Indian government don't send troops into America to obstruct road construction there? Chinese people also build roads, railways, schools, hospitals, hotels and shopping centers in South African countries, but India don't send troops there to obstruct road construction.
    3
  10211. Agreed. But it's strange how Trump supported Saudi Arabian prince killing of a journalist (Trump even called the journalist "an enemy of the state") and even the new Biden Administration is reluctant to call out the Saudi prince's actions. But they readily do so against the Thai Monarchy in Thailand. Part of U.S double standards.
    3
  10212. Foreigners always complain Chinese people rude, jaywalk, spit in public, jump queues, disobey traffic rules, so what the government is doing is implement a system that discourage such behavior, and if your score falls too low, you will not be able to buy plane tickets to fly overseas and make nuisance of yourself in other countries.
    3
  10213. The U.S says: "Number 1: Those Ukraine bio-labs simply do not exist! Period!" "Number 2: Those non-existent labs are for peaceful civilian use, certainly not for military purpose!" "Number 3: If those non-existent civilian labs fall in to Russian hands, they will use the data to develop military bio-weapons to use in false flag operations! No doubt about it!"
    3
  10214. Many Western MSM journalists literally have their paycheck tied to the corporations, and reporting the truth is no longer as important as sensationalizing (and even lying) in order to further their master's agendas.
    3
  10215.  user-bz4tw3bu9u  If an animal is considered livestock in certain countries, then what's wrong with different countries having different culinary practices?
    3
  10216.    About infrastructure in China, China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours.
    3
  10217.    So why doesn't the more capitalistic country, the United States, have high speed rail, since you claim that happens in a private free market? For your information, China's high speed rail actually operates on a loss not profit, which private company would offer to do that?
    3
  10218.    In a capitalistic free market enterprise, the private corporations exploit resources and labour power in pursuit of profits for themselves, unnecessarily polluting the environment if they can get away with it, lowering wages for workers and increasing fares/prices for customers. Look at the crumbling infrastructure in the United States, and how exactly does private industry support infrastructure, you tell me?
    3
  10219.  @jaimemartinez9792  "神州 Shenzhou B/c the USA is large and high speed doesn't fit the geography." The USA is around the same size as China. China is approximately 9,595,960 sq km, while the United States is approximately 9,833,517 sq km, making the USA only 2% larger than China. Yet China has far more high speed rail than USA or Japan. And did I ever said that Chinese invented high speed rail? Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions?
    3
  10220.    What makes you think you can't openly protest in China? China sees on average some 500 protests every day, over a wide variety of grievances, including corruption, forced evictions, unpaid wages, human rights abuses, environmental degradation, ethnic protests, petitioning for religious freedom and civil liberties, protests against one-party rule, as well as nationalist protests against foreign countries. The number of annual protests has grown steadily since the early 1990s, from approximately 8,700 "mass group incidents" in 1993 to over 87,000 in 2005. In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010. (or an average of 493 protests every day in 2010)
    3
  10221. Here's how United State's logic works: Rule Number 1: Those bio-labs in Ukraine simply do not exist! Period! Rule Number 2: Those non-existent labs are for civilian use, certainly not for military purposes! Rule Number 3: If Russia gets their hands on those non-existent, civilian labs, they'll definitely use the data to develop military bio-weapons to be deployed in false flag operations. No doubt about it! ... (Hope people can realize I'm being sarcastic here)
    3
  10222.  @kammonkam4905  Mo Zi (墨子, also called "Micius" in English) is celebrated in China today. If I'm not mistaken, the world's first quantum satellite was launched by China in 2016 and the satellite itself was named "Micius" or "Mozi" in homage to the philosopher's writings on optics. "Since Han the rulers have combined Confucianism and the harsh legalistic school as two pillars of autocratic rules." And the combined philosophies of Confucianism and Legalism worked to successfully guide China through thousands of years of history and survive the passage of time to modern times. It's become the basis of Chinese culture and it's how Chinese civilization survived for thousands of years, where other ancient civilizations like Egypt, Mesopotamia, Rome, etc eventually crumbled.
    3
  10223.  @kammonkam4905  We've been talking for some time, and I'm getting the feeling that you're just seemingly anti-China for no apparent reason that's all. It's like you look down on Chinese culture, Chinese people, Chinese history... the list goes on! And it appears you can't stand to see China pursue our own path to success that's all. Where does this anti-China sentiment of yours seem to come from?
    3
  10224.  @kammonkam4905  You did twist my words. I've been saying Yuan is Chinese (for reasons stated above) but you've somehow twisted it to become Mongols and Japanese are Chinese. It's like you can't refute my points, so you throw in all sorts of unrelated issues (i.e Noah's Ark, Roman and Greeks, Japanese are Chinese) instead of refuting my point. It's like you're comparing apples and oranges here, claiming that what applies for one has to apply to the other.
    3
  10225. @Zicheng Zhang 老实说翻墙之后就觉得西方媒体对中国很傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    3
  10226. China has amphibious assault vehicles like the ZTD-05 (VN18) said to be world's fastest amphibious assault vehicle, able to attain sailing speeds of up to 30kmph, which is the fastest of it's kind. Video: Chinese firm built 'fastest' amphibious assault vehicle youtu.be/4rzoWPWbai8 The tracks and wheel can withdraw into the body to reduce water traction and it's max ground speed is 65kmph, with a cannon, a machine gun and 14 people on board. It's engine can produce 1600 horsepower, a figure normally associated with heavy tanks.
    3
  10227.  @MagDrag123  You said: "voting is not compulsory in the US, so a more factual statement would be "US politicians are voted into power by citizens who could vote"." The fact remains that it is the majority of American citizens who could in fact vote, voted for those same politicians.
    3
  10228.  @jonlim3963  Yes, if what Richard said in the interview was correct, the "cash card" containing digital Renminbi, available to elderly people in China (who don't use Internet or WeChat) should be available to foreigners as well. If the card runs low on funds, then you can simply top it up at any ATM (once fully implemented). And you get to enjoy the convenience of using WeChat/Alipay to pay for purchases, without the hassle of setting up WeChat Pay account. No need for Internet connection too, for those visitors who don't want to sign up for a mobile data plan while in China for a few days only.
    3
  10229.  @gepimu  But like Richard said in the video, China is the first country to put forth a digital version of its currency and future users have China to thank for laying down the foundation for digital currency infrastructure.
    3
  10230. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory. Its like a snake trying to swallow an elephant. 蛇吞象
    3
  10231.  @FMR------------------psst  If you look at whole of human history, most of the ancient world has been governed by authoritarianism and oligarchies. Political power was oftentimes not concentrated in the hands of the many, but instead in the hands of the few elites, such as nobles (aristocracy) or priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy). Such political systems were commonplace throughout ancient times, because they were stable and simply because they worked! The elites were often well-educated and politically aware to make important political decisions, and the ignorant masses were kept well away from politics. And Democracy has a long history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, even Republic of Rome fell. These earliest proto-democracies did not succeed and democracy was never popular outside of Greece. And while modern Western democracy is clearly different, it has only about 100-200 years of history so it is still unproven in the course of history, whether it will be successful or not. So history tells us what the present (and possibly, the future) will be like, if only people would listen to history.
    3
  10232.  @Jimmy-lm2eg  What? I only posted one comment here in this thread so far that's all.
    3
  10233.  @Jimmy-lm2eg  Which other videos are you talking about? Are you saying I can't post comments on different videos?
    3
  10234. When China discovered Japan, it was a starving, tribal nation, so China taught them how to grow rice to feed themselves, how to use chopsticks, how to cultivate silk for their beautiful clothing, how to build Asian style architecture, and even how to read and write poetry and calligraphy in Chinese characters (Kanji). When China was strong, Japan emulated China. Then the Portuguese showed up and Japan bought guns from them, and emulated their language. Japanese copied Portuguese words like Pan (Bread), Tempura (Fried Food), kappa (Raincoat), etc, but they wrote it using Chinese characters. The Westerners colonized countries, so Japan learn to colonize other countries during WW2. Now that America is strong and Japan surrendered to USA after WW2, so many English words have entered Japanese vocabulary, with examples including Aidoru (Idol), Arukoru (Alcohol), Biru (Beer) Botan (Button), Kohi (Coffee), Konbini (Convenience Store), etc. Virtually every spoken sentence in Japanese has some foreign words copied from China, Portuguese or English in it.
    3
  10235. +WuttiTzai武帝財 别客气。
    3
  10236.  @cam129  If you want to talk about countries jailing their OWN people, just look at America having the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. And Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Even in your home country, the first Indian PM, Jawaharlal Nehru had acknowledged that Tibet is part of China, and India's stance regarding Tibet has remained unchanged even till today, that it's a part of China.
    3
  10237. Many Filipinos (but not all) tend to have the colonial mentality. A colonial mentality is the internalized attitude of ethnic or cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization. Decolonization of the Philippines would require the mental decolonization of the people's minds.
    3
  10238. After 2017 Grenfell Tower fire in London, many people made homeless by the fire still do not have houses to call home.
    3
  10239. China is reviving the ancient "Mandate of Heaven" that guided China successfully for over 4000-5000 years of history. If the ruler is just and competent, then he is allowed to stay in power, and if he isn't then the peasants and common people will eventually rise up to oust him from power, like at the end of many Chinese dynasties.
    3
  10240. @Karan dhabalia Is there something wrong with me being Chinese?
    3
  10241.  @basshunterdota625  The new Malaysian PM Myhyiddin haven't have any opportunities to speak publicly about China-Malaysia relations, because of the pandemic. But I'm sure he will reiterate China-Malaysia relations in a similar fashion as Dr Mahathir.
    3
  10242. @卡尔弗里德希里 楼主是马来西亚人，支持印度而不是中国。
    3
  10243.  Moni Penny  Agreed. No other ASEAN country slapped sanctions on Russia apart from Singapore, so Singapore is certainly not neutral.
    3
  10244.  @fatdoi003  If Singapore is a commerce country, why slap sanctions on Russia? Sanctions simply don't work, they are barriers to doing business in fact. No other South East Asian or ASEAN country slapped sanctions on Russia, except for Singapore, so yet can't Singapore do as its neighbours done? It makes no sense for Singapore to give up its neutral status and earn a place in Russia's list of "unfriendly countries".
    3
  10245. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overruning the West) that's fueling fear and paranoia of China today in the West.
    3
  10246.  @michaeljames2349  You said: "神州 Shenzhou They're not but keep trying" If they are not, then why is the West so afraid of Russia and China? A multipolar world allows multiple voices to be heard, from multiple sides. Whereas the unipolar world only allows a single voice to be heard (namely that of the U.S).
    3
  10247. Cyrus' video is about EVs (electric vehicles), not self-driving cars. At this stage, the technology for self-driving car are still very much in its infancy. Also, the transition to self-driving cars is most likely going to be diffused in nature, with a mixture of both self-driving and non self-driving vehicles on the road at the same time.
    3
  10248. @Purplepiperpicklepeople Now it's China that's the land of business opportunities and the place that the smart and ambitious are heading to. Did you see the record 5-minute EV battery charging by Chinese company BYD?
    3
  10249. ​ @Purplepiperpicklepeople You talk about Americas' success, influence, power, and wealth, but is it really their own? They imported slaves from Africa to work in their cotton fields. Their wealth is not their own, all those gold, oil and resources belonged to the Native Americans. And the Native American's lands are still being occupied today, and their numbers have greatly fallen from once being the majority to now a minority in their own lands.
    3
  10250. @sjent - Yes often. Such as China's. -Never said China is the first or the only. -Degrees Fahrenheit -12 hours is considered an entire night.
    3
  10251. @sjent It is physically possible if you combine solar power with molten salt thermal storage. China's solar power plant in the Gobi desert does exactly that, producing solar power during the day and also heating up molten salt to generate electricity at night. And why can't I use Fahrenheit? The United States still uses it and despite it's decline, it's certainly not one of those 5 backwater countries.
    3
  10252.  @sjent  Never said it was a solar power plant alone, I stated that it's physically possible if you combine solar power with molten salt thermal storage. Also, technically it is possible for solar power plants to generate power even at night, if the plants are located near polar regions during summer, where there is sunlight even at midnight. You said: This is why i said "AND" When did you ever said "AND"? Could you quote me your exact sentence where you said "AND"?
    3
  10253. ​ @sjent Never said it was a solar power plant alone, I stated that it's physically possible if you combine solar power with molten salt thermal storage. Also, technically it is possible for solar power plants to generate power even at night, if the plants are located near polar regions during summer, where there is sunlight even at midnight. You said: This is why i said "AND" When did you ever said "AND"? Could you quote me your exact sentence where you said "AND"?
    3
  10254.  @urbanistgod  Politics should be about doing what's right, not what's popular. Sometimes, what's popular, may not be what's right and what's right may not be what's popular. Democracy is only doing what's popular, not necessarily what's right.
    3
  10255. You people constantly bring up Chinese government problems, then what about Imperial Japanese government invading China to commit atrocities like Rape of Nanjing, Unit 731 and "comfort" women? Japanese forces committed so many war atrocities on other races across Asia, from China and Korea to South East Asia like Philippines and Singapore. Which Asian country betray other Asians like Chinese, Indians, Koreans, Filipinos and create colonies in Asia, trying to emulate the colonial "white" men? So much evidence exists of Japanese racism during its imperial period.
    3
  10256. +Captain Midnight If Japanese people don't agree with their PM, then why is Abe's support at an all time high right now? Your article was set in 2015, but right now like you said, they support Abe in militarizing the Japanese army. Also, those that protest are students, who like students everywhere, are idealistic and their world consists of textbooks and not about the real political situation faced in Japan today. So you think the Jews would be happy if the Germans erected a shrine dedicated to Nazism and Hitler? You clearly don't know Asian cultural and dismiss what Japanese people are doing by honoring their ancestors in a warshrine, like Yasukuni shrine. The Japanese Class-A warcriminals should be housed in a war museum, which is neutral territory, instead of a warshrine where Japanese people go to worship. What evidence do you have to show that Japanese were aware of the full extent their warcrimes? Younger generation of Japanese people think "comfort" women are "well-paid prostitutes" generously paid for their services. The following source illustrates this and claims that If they were paid, they weren't victims, but workers. It also says that the women were forced to serve several soldiers in a day, and weren't allowed to refuse soldiers. Comfort Women During WWII deniseworldpolitics.weebly.com/comfort-women.html If you still think Japanese isn't racist, then why they subject such cruelty onto people of other races, by invading their territory and raping our women? Even South Koreans are against Japanese denial of Comfort Women issue, and have even erected a bronze statue of a young girl as a protest outside Japanese embassy. Its not just the Chinese here who are protesting.
    3
  10257.  Fishka Grishka  "神州 Shenzhou uUighurs are 40 million ,Chinese government aim to leave 10 million." 40 million Uighurs? The total number of Uighurs in the world is only 13.5 million Uighurs, where did you get your bloated figure of 40 million Uighurs? Did you deliberately exaggerate the figure so you can subtract from it later?
    3
  10258.  Fishka Grishka  Ethnic minorities in China (Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchu, etc) aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. I know this, because I have ethnic minority friends in China, they aren't subject to the One Child Policy unlike Han.
    3
  10259.  Fishka Grishka  I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    3
  10260.  Fishka Grishka  Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions?
    3
  10261.  Fishka Grishka  Huawei actually overtaken Apple and Samsung to become the world's largest smartphone manufacture.
    3
  10262.  @johanhirte9661  Why would a so-called independent organisation like BCI accept funding from USAID (which also claims independence, yet states that they take foreign-policy guidance from the US Secretary of state)? And companies like H&M, Adidas, Nike, Uniqlo are facing boycott by Chinese, they won't be earning Chinese yuan that easily if they believe fake news by BCI.
    3
  10263.  @johanhirte9661  The Four Great Inventions (四大发明) have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. With Chinese invention of paper, came inventions like paper lanterns, paper umbrellas and paper banknote (which made business transactions easier since merchants need not carry around lots of metal coinage and precious stones) Mankind's first aviation was in the form of paper kite, and even hot air balloons were invented in China, and were known as Sky Lanterns (天灯) or Kongming Lanterns (孔明灯).
    3
  10264.  @johanhirte9661  "神州 Shenzhou because it would be the same situation." Sketchers was able to conduct their own audits, so why can't H&M, Nike, Adidas, Uniqlo do the same? This isn't 1958, so why are you bringing up 60 years ago? And I'm not talking about investigating the government, I'm talking about those clothing brands auditing their own cotton sources in Xinjiang, why are you talking about investigating the government?
    3
  10265.  @johanhirte9661  About scientific output, China publishes more research papers than any other in the world, over a wide range of topics such as physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences. Countries by published scientific papers in 2018: 1. China (528,263 articles) 2. United States (422,808 articles) 3. India (135,788 articles) 4. Germany (104,396 articles) 5. Japan (98,793 articles) 6. United Kingdom (97,681 articles) 7. Russia (81,579 8. Italy (71,240 articles) 9. South Korea (66,376 articles) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by number of scientific and technical journal articles This shows that many Chinese scientist and researchers are making discoveries and publishing their findings, contributing to mankind's scientific advancements.
    3
  10266. +The Centre So why don't you tell me exactly which country is China currently "at war" with at the moment? Is China at war with SE Asian countries, or India or North Korea?
    3
  10267. nguyen khanh When did I ever say that at all? All I said was that "Those seas are known globally as the South China Sea and East China Sea respectively." Nothing wrong with the above statement.
    3
  10268.  @og6433  Do you actually have evidence that Medvedchuk is a crook?
    3
  10269.  @MarkYeung1  China has slashed the quarantine time for international arrivals from 10 days to 5 days. But again, the fact remains that China prioritize people's safety first over business.
    3
  10270.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Unfortunately they didn't save the life of the 3 year old with carbon monoxide poisoning." The district health authorities published their report, pledging to deeply learn from this painful lesson and said officials who had failed in their duties would be handled seriously. Also, I find it astonishing that you focus on this, when the United States which represents just 4% of the world's population, is home to 25% of the world's covid deaths.
    3
  10271.  @loksky7583  I too, have encountered online some Filipinos (not all) who kept insulting Made-in-China products. My response was to tell them to get rid of all their Made-in-China products, like computers, electronics, appliances, clothing, sneakers, etc. Even devices that contain parts that were Made-in-China should be gotten rid off. Turns out that they simply couldn't do what I told them do, they only responded with hurling more insults my way.
    3
  10272. So you're a Filipino who support Taiwan's claim over the 11 Dash Line covering a wider swathe of the South China Seas than mainland China's 9 Dash Line?
    3
  10273.  @budenskarinderia  Haven't you heard of the Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident? A Taiwanese boat tried to ram the Philippines Coastguard, and the coastguard open fired on the vessel and killed a 65-year old Taiwanese, Hong Shicheng (洪石成).
    3
  10274.  @budenskarinderia  So if your logic is that Philippines apologized for a Taiwanese ship ramming Philippines coastguard, then shouldn't it be Philippines apologizing to China today for the same thing? And since you want to return to 2024, then Taiwan still maintains its claim to a larger swathe of the South China Sea, (through the 11 Dash Line) than mainland China's 9 Dash Line.
    3
  10275. China has a bad historical run-in with psychoactive drugs including cannabis. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    3
  10276.  @MarkYeung1  But you've repeatedly called for China to stop doing business with Russia, yet you look the other way when India continues do business with Russia and does not call out Russia's special military operation. As for influencing Russia, China has put forth a 12-point process for peaceful resolution in Ukraine. This has garnered approval from Russia as Putin has welcomed this move, but it's the U.S that opposes this peace plan.
    3
  10277.  @yslee1401  Can't we applaud the leader of a country of 1.4 billion, without being labelled as shilling by you? It's certainly no easy feat to lead a country with such a huge population.
    3
  10278.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Hong Kong people are NOT interested in becoming pawns of the west. Hong Kong people are NOT interested in independence. Hong Kong people are NOT interested in destabilising the mainland." I never said that Hong Kong people are, I'm just saying that if Hong Kong decides to become a tool of the West, then mainland China will not tolerate it. But during the Hong Kong protests, some Hong Kong people can be seen waving United States 🇺🇲 flag or the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 flag among the crowds, these are the suspected foreign-assisted forces that are threatening Hong Kong and the mainland, so the Hong Kong National Security Law is meant to target these separatists. About destabilising the mainland, Hong Kong's status as a financial hub took an economic blow during the 2019 Hong Kong riots, and this negatively impacted the mainland. Hong Kong is an important financial centre in Asia and the mainland's gateway to the West. If there is continued unrest in Hong Kong then it will negatively impact the mainland's image, especially if the protests are prolonged for more than a year. Even after HK Chief Executive Carrie Lam cancelled the extradition bill, the HK rioters continued with no end in sight. So obviously, the central government needed to step in to finally bring an end to the riots in Hong Kong and bring stability back to Hong Kong under the Hong Kong National Security Law. Otherwise, let the 2019 Hong Kong riots continue for another year, 2 years, 3 years with no end in sight? Something had to be done to stop the riots and return Hong Kong to stability.
    3
  10279.  @thebeststooge  About Chinese "Ghost" cities, every year, China has millions of people migrating from rural countryside to the urban areas to find jobs, and they are slowly filling up those ghost cities. For example, in Dec 2011, London’s Daily Mail reported that the Zhengzhou New Area 郑州市 was China’s largest “Ghost City.” But today, Zhengzhou has a population of 10,120,000 inhabitants, and had a GDP of 1,014 billion(RMB) in 2018. It just means that it takes some time for our cities to fill up that's all.
    3
  10280.  @GM6.7  This is part of China's Made in China 2025 initiative, aiming to move away from being the world's "factory" (producing cheap, low quality goods due to lower labour costs) and move to producing higher value products and services. It is in essence a blueprint to upgrade the manufacturing capabilities of Chinese industries and an attempt to move the country's manufacturing up the value chain. and become a major manufacturing power in direct competition with the United States. Source: Wikipedia: Made in China 2025
    3
  10281.  @GM6.7  Back then, British empire was different, they had guns and weren't afraid to use them in negotiations, depriving natives of their lands, occupying the aboriginal territories even till today (such as American and Australia) and importing African slaves to labor for them, That's why the natives did what they did. Modern times are different with China, and China treats the less developed countries as partners, willing to work out deals that benefit both parties in a win-win situation. Nobody is pointing guns and forcing anyone to deal with China. If these less developed countries don't want Chinese business, they are always free to back out and China will simply take our business elsewhere.
    3
  10282.  @thebeststooge  Check out this video of beautiful Zhengzhou, which was once declared China's largest Ghost city back in 2011 by London's Daily Mail. (Watch in HD for the best experience.) _《Hello, ZHENGZHOU 》 by Yaoking Video: youtube(dot)com/watch?v=jFdLkgDS-QE&t=8
    3
  10283.  @stopwarstop7334  Is there a build-up of People's Liberation Army soldiers on the mainland/Taiwan border in the Taiwan Straits (like the build-up of Russian troops at it's border with Ukraine)?
    3
  10284.  @PebblesWhiskey  Drive-by with a loaded gun? So which People's Liberation Army Navy warship has travelled through the Taiwan Strait (i.e the mainland/Taiwan border)? Answer: None! So what drive-by are you talking about when there's been no PLAN warship sailing in the Taiwan Strait? In fact it's the United States Navy warships that's been coming to the Taiwan Strait from halfway across the globe, every month or so, such as USS Milius and the USS Dewey. The UK also send warships to Taiwan Strait, such as the HMS Richmond. Even Canada sent the HMCS Winnipeg through Taiwan Strait. So to answer your question, No. We don't like USA, UK, Canada and other countries driving by the Taiwan Strait, so we deploy missiles inside our own territory pointed at the Taiwan Strait to act as a deterrence.
    3
  10285.  @PebblesWhiskey  If you don't want China to point missiles at the Taiwan Strait, then why don't you tell those US, UK, Canada navy vessels not to conduct drive by? Yet you're accusing China of being a bully when it's these Western countries interfering in China's internal affairs?
    3
  10286.  @stopwarstop7334  But the People's Republic of China claims Taiwan as part of PRC, just like how ROC claims the mainland as part of their territory. Even after the 1972 Shanghai Communique, the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is part of China, and that U.S does not challenge this position. On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia...The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position. ... Source: The Diplomat: The Shanghai Communique: An American Foreign Policy Success, 45 Years Later
    3
  10287.  @stopwarstop7334  Taiwan is an inalienable part of China under the People's Republic of China constitution. And the Indian government, US government, Japanese government all recognised that Taiwan is part of China since the 1972 Shanghai Communique then what more needs to be said? Taiwan cannot even declare independence without incurring serious consequences, then for all your talk, you can't even walk the talk. (Also, 800 million people in the United States? The population of the United States is around 300 million)
    3
  10288.  @stopwarstop7334  You accept ROC constitution, that means ROC claims all of mainland China as their territory, then PRC constitution can also claim Taiwan as part of PRC territory.
    3
  10289.  @stopwarstop7334  So you accept ROC constitution but ROC claim all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Since ROC can claim the mainland as part of their territory, then PRC can claim Taiwan as part of our territory isn't it? Taiwan is not even a UN member and the UN countries recognise that Taiwan is part of China since the 1972 Shanghai Communique. Even just recently the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua switched recognition of Taipei to Beijing, so fewer and fewer countries are recognising ROC constitution.
    3
  10290.  @stopwarstop7334  "神州 Shenzhou as said anybody can claim anything in their constitution." So since ROC can claim all of mainland China, that means PRC can claim Taiwan as part of PRC. You can't have double standards now. You said: "Republic of China can claim the whole of mainland but really is still up to you guys if you want to return to Republic of China" Why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 even lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and fled to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Wiping out the communists should have been a piece of cake, yet despite all their initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while at the same time cementing the communist's right to rule China. Why then should the PRC revert back to ROC when the ROC couldn't hold the mainland? You said: "If you want to return then quickly go tell Xi Jing Ping to change back PRC to Republic of China so your dream of reunification can happen quickly." I've previously mentioned that Time is on China's side. Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out stems from perceived U.S support, but as long as peace prevails, the U.S will eventually declined to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise. At that point, Taiwan's backing will be gone and reunification will be inevitable without the perceived U.S support by Taiwan.
    3
  10291.  @stopwarstop7334  Taiwan not being a UN member already locks it out of numerous privileges, so the walls are slowly closing in and it's only a manner of time before Taiwan eventually reunifies with the mainland. Yet you claim Taiwan can wait forever? The DPP will eventually have to step down some day because of term limits, then who knows, maybe a more pro-reunification party might take over Taiwan's government in the future.
    3
  10292.  @stopwarstop7334  In a democracy, not only the government can change, but also the people's feelings can change, and who knows, perhaps in the future the people of Taiwan want reunification with the mainland. In a democracy, someone pro-reunification like Ma Ying Jeou got into power, this means that in the future, another similar pro-reunification candidate can become the president someday, and then promote reunification with the mainland. In a democracy, you can't tell what the future holds because your government and your people's feelings constantly change. It's like a coin toss every time with each Taiwan election. Either heads or tails. You keep getting heads for a while, but eventually you're going to get tails one day. Whereas China's government is always pro-reunification, no matter how much time passes. But hey, this is the democracy that Taiwan choose, so keep tossing your coin for each election. Mainland China is very patient.
    3
  10293.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "unless Beijing is willing to compromise (like Deng when he dealt with Hong Kong and the 1 country 2 systems)" That's precisely what Beijing did. In 2019, President Xi offered to extend the 1 Country, 2 Systems to include Taiwan, so that Taiwan would be allowed to keep their own separate government from the mainland, and yet be fully considered part of China (just like Hong Kong and Macau). But the Taiwan rejected Beijing's offer, and did not offer a counter-proposal of their own, then what is Beijing to do to resolve this issue?
    3
  10294. There's also those asymptomatic cases (meaning you don't display any obvious symptoms despite contracting the virus) so you might feel well and decide to go outside, unknowingly infecting others in the process.
    3
  10295.  @vivavivo5071  Not that I know of.
    3
  10296.  @rpg1663  Chinese company SMIC had a chip breakthrough, developing a 7 nm chip for use in semiconductors despite the U.S sanctions and possibly advancing China's chip technology by two generations.
    3
  10297.  @rpg1663  You said: " how many years will it take for China to develop a EUV machine... By that time, we'll be talking about pico instead of nano transistors :D" Remember, the current nano transistors are all silicon-based, and scientists are discovering that despite advances in chip technology, humans are rapidly approaching the theoretical limit to just how small we can make silicon chips. There's a limit to just how small we can make (silicon based) chips. The size of a silicon atom is . 2 nm. and suffice it to say, it would be impossible to create a silicon transistor smaller than that. If we are unable to make transistors smaller, then “Moore’s Law” will be broken, since we can no longer double the number of transistors we can fit onto chips. There have been other proposed solutions to this problem, one of which is switching from silicon-based semiconductors to carbon-based semiconductors using graphene and carbon nanotubes. In 2017, Chinese scientists made a carbon-based chip with a gate length of 5 nm, that's more efficient that silicon-based chips in terms of performance and power consumption. Also, the way to manufacture these carbon-based chips does not require access to EUV lithography machines by the U.S. This means that if China is successful in carbon-based chips, then we wouldn't have to waste any more time developing EUV lithography as silicon-based chips approach the theoretical limit.
    3
  10298. Had Ukraine been a liberal democracy, Zelensky would have allowed elections. Now his term as President is due to expire by May 20th 2024.
    3
  10299.  @GMK189-f2k  The terms I used like "Chinese" and "Westerners" refer to certain groups of people, not races in and of themselves, so how's that even racist?
    3
  10300.  obimk1  About the satellite images, they are just images from space and they don't necessarily reflect what's happening on the ground, it's just wild-guessing and speculation that's all. In fact, most of the satellite images correspond to civilian facilities like schools, elderly homes, residential districts, and so on. One of the so-called satellite images even turned out to be a 5-star apartment complex Source: Netizens, local residents disprove satellite imagery-based accusations on Xinjiang globaltimes.cn/content/1199460.shtml 赤 wrote: Supposedly fortified structures on this map which are designated as camps by USAGM and buzzfeed were identified based on parts of Baidu maps without high resolution images. Yet I can somehow view these locations in Urumqi on baidu maps without any issue 赤 wrote: Given that most of these locations that USAGM/Buzzfeed alleges are camps can in fact be found on Baidu maps the absence of high res satellite photos in rural areas of Xinjiang is not an attempt to hide alleged camps. The entire premise of this propaganda is fundamentally flawed. 赤 wrote: Sometimes these alleged camps are completely obviously complete bullshit. This 'camp' is not only shown by Baidu maps but quite obviously an apartment complex. A 'camp' with a 5 star rating?
    3
  10301.  @fuemoua8345  Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China youtu.be/TtduKDpy4oc China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    3
  10302. +China Driving Observations "but I really cannot view it as a tourist destination" According to World Tourism Ranking, as of 2015, China is the 4th most popular tourist destination in the world, after France, United States, and Spain, with 56.9 million international tourists per year, and China is the most visited Asian country in the world, surpassing even Japan, Korea and India. World Tourism Ranking wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings As for historical sites, China ranks 2nd in the world in number of UNESCO World Heritage Sites, with 53 sites, only behind Italy/Rome at number 1 with 54 sites. World Heritage site wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Heritage_site
    3
  10303.  @NA22427  I have repeatedly ask people for evidence of Peng Shuai's sexual assault. I have read Peng Shuai's post (you can find the translated version on Reddit) and she has had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several years in fact, but where are the allegations of sexual assault? Peng Shuai even written an email to WTA saying that the allegations of sexual assault were not true, and she even criticised the WTA for releasing unverified information without her consent. And Peng Shuai is clearly fine, we have footage of Peng Shuai attending diners and award ceremonies for youth athletes, so what's the big fuss over? Peng Shuai had expressed the desire for privacy during the video call with IOC, but WTA is trying to pry into her personal affairs.
    3
  10304.  @fl338  You said: "I do not beleive that what Cryus is publishing is for the benefit of the US." Could you explain why you think so? Cyrus (not Cryus) is pro peace, his videos have the message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls". Since we have established that Cyrus is an American, then he certainly doesn't have the power to change China, but as a U.S citizen, he certainly has the power to improve the U.S.
    3
  10305. @Sheriff Lobo The deserts in China aren't heavily polluted by heavy metals so is there something wrong with growing crops in the desert to feed our population? You mentioned "it just increases the incidence of cancer" but the countries with the highest rate of cancer are usually the Western developed countries. Countries with the highest rates of cancer (number of people per 100,000 that develop cancer): 1. United States — 542 2. Canada — 463 3. New Zealand — 321 4. Norway — 315 5. Australia — 304 6. Japan — 299 7. Netherlands — 282 ... Video: The Country with the Highest Rate of Cancer youtu.be/YEw68xNG8TY China's cancer rate is only 181 per 100,000 in comparison...
    3
  10306. From what I understand, tailless aircraft aren't all that new. The US Stealth Bomber (Northrop B-2 Spirit) has no tail, granting it an increased stealth profile, while making it somewhat less maneuverable. The B-2 is still quite stable since it's a heavy bomber (take-off weight 170 tons), whereas China's new fighter is testing the tailless design on a lighter frame (max take-off weight 40 tons).
    3
  10307. The Uighurs are being given a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese, Chinese history and that their motherland is People's Republic of China. Just like Hawaiian kids are given an American education, taught English, American history and that their motherland is United States of America.
    3
  10308.  @primeroultimo  The trade deficit between USA and China was ultimately caused by "American consumerism". Because Chinese goods are (generally) cheaper than American goods, so many Americans buy from China. Whereas American goods are more expensive in China, so few Chinese want to buy Made-In-America goods, when even Americans themselves don't want to buy their own products. Yet you think Trump forcing China to buy American goods is the right decision? Whatever happened to the principles of "free market"? Isn't this forcing a customer to buy something that he/she doesn't want?
    3
  10309.  @warrendoris9669  I'm willing to bet he himself hasn't read the Budapest Memorandum and just spouts it because it's what he's been told.
    3
  10310. @Ben Benito Like I said, the U.S printing dollars is like Wile. E Coyote chasing Road Runner off a cliff, and continues running on air even after the ground below him disappears.
    3
  10311.  @Andy-P  You said: "At least I can read about these Police actions. What about the protestors in Henan who have had their accounts frozen" What about them? I can also read about those police actions, so what's your point? If anything, you're proving the fact that people in China do protest after all.
    3
  10312.  @catonpillow  Agreed. Outwardly, USA expressed support for Japan dumping irradiated Fukushima waters. But inwardly, USA has maintained a ban on imports of farming and seafood products from the region near Fukushima. Yet JaYoe Nation thinks Chinese are just being racist against Japanese, when the real two-faced racist is outwardly supporting Japan's decision, but inwardly banning seafood imports from Fukushima?
    3
  10313.  @alantan9863  "Shenzhou. Because if Singapire join China in any was, this would incur Malaysia's wrath. They're expelled from Malaysia to ensure ethnic Malays form the majority of the country..." But Singapore joining China will not affect the population of Malays in Malaysia. Malays will still be the majority in Malaysia even if Singapore joins China.
    3
  10314.  @bartonlee3594  You keep on calling it an echo-chamber, but just in this thread alone, have you looked at how many times you simply nodded in agreement with someone's post, just because their view happens to agree with yours? Then aren't you the one stuck in an echo-chamber yourself?
    3
  10315.  antwinettec  Even medical masks are mostly Made in China and the USA urgently needs Chinese masks during this difficult period. Source: The U.S. Needs China’s Masks, as Acrimony Grows nytimes.com/2020/03/23/business/coronavirus-china-masks.html American front-line medical personnel are running desperately short of masks and protective equipment as they battle the coronavirus outbreak. China, already the world’s largest producer of such gear by far, has ramped up factory output and is now signaling that it wants to help.
    3
  10316.  @lindarasmussen1686  "people are dying while chi a sells substandard equipment..." Video: China: Factory produces 5 million masks a day in bid to supply shortfall youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw?t=17
    3
  10317.  antwinettec  This factory in the eastern Chinese city of Rizhao (日照) has been busy pumping out 3,000,000 masks a day. Video: Inside China's Biggest Mask Factory youtu.be/Gc074FxOBA4?t=11
    3
  10318.  antwinettec  Orders for ventilators are pouring in and China is working 24/7 making ventilators. Video: China is working 24/7 to make ventilators youtu.be/kJ81HY_M-zI Ventilators can determine if some Covid-19 patients live or die. Doctors from Italy to the US desperately need them and orders at factories are pouring in. "There's literally no country in the world that doesn't want to buy a ventilator from China right now. We have tens of thousands of orders waiting. The issue is how fast we can make them." - Li Kai, Director of Beijing Aeonmed
    3
  10319. Lobos222 China has 5000 years history and is one of the world's oldest 'continuous' civilizations still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like, Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since faded to history.
    3
  10320.  @mlai2546  Chinese scientists also built quantum computing machine that is 24,000 times faster than international counterparts and 10-100 times faster than the first electronic computer, ENIAC. Source: World's First Quantum Computer Made By China fossbytes.com/worlds-first-quantum-computer-made-by-china/ The quantum computer is built by a team of Chinese scientists working at the University of Science and Technology of China, at Hefei in Anhui province. The researchers believe that quantum computing could excel the processing power of supercomputers. Pan Jianwei, a quantum physicist, and an academician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said that quantum computing makes use of quantum superposition principle for ultra-fast parallel calculation and simulation capabilities.
    3
  10321.  @lakvenk6554  The CEOs of Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple were asked by lawmakers if they believed China steals technology from US companies. 3 out of 4 answered "No, I have no instance of China stealing their technology." Only Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook said yes. Video: Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple respond to Congress about whether China steals US technology youtu.be/v6whxZm1ubQ
    3
  10322. Peng Shuai is trying to lay low and avoid the public eye for a while until this all blows over, and she has expressed her desire for personal privacy during a video call with IOC. But the WTA is trying to pry into her personal affairs and demanding she appear in public and bare her private life for all the world to see.
    3
  10323.  @adcruz5983  Afghanistan defeated the United States, even though it was invaded illegally.
    3
  10324.  @MarkYeung1  There is a flaw in your way of thinking. You said China "decoupled" from Australian coal in 2020, but the blackouts occurred one year later in 2021, so it's clearly not because of Australian coal that those blackouts occurred. According BBC, the blackouts were caused by surge in demand for Chinese goods and the factories making them needed a lot of power. Beijing also imposed rules to make the country carbon neutral by 2060 have led to slower coal production, and the government controlled electricity prices so the coal-fired power plants are unwilling to operate at a loss, so they reduced output. ... Source: BBC: China power cuts: What is causing the country's blackouts? There is no mention of Australian coal being the cause of China's blackouts in that BBC article.
    3
  10325.  @deschan2246  World economies today are interlinked and it is impossible to separate the global supply chain today. Chinese goods are everywhere today and Chinese components can be found in many products today.
    3
  10326.  @joeburns88  China's economic growth is still 6.2% whereas the US economic growth is only 3.1%. And what makes you think America can even do anything in the long run? Your US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years and that's why they only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long-term plans, spanning, say 10 years or more. Whereas China abolished the presidential term limits so our leaders can remain in power long enough to make long term plans for China's future. Take the Belt and Road Initiative for example and its an example of long term strategy to expand China's influence globally.
    3
  10327.  @joeburns88  You expect Trump to severe all relations with China in just 5 years? Trump's 2nd term is an unconfirmed scenario, and even if it does happen, it's impossible to severe all relations with China in just 5 years. US presidents can't even solve America's long term woes like rising debt and healthcare, that's why they pin their woes on China when Chinese goods have been helping Americans save money on living expenses all along.
    3
  10328.  @deschan2246   Chinese universities trained the world's most STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) graduates, more than any other country in the world. Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/02/02/the-countries-with-the-most-stem-graduates-infographic/ 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000)
    3
  10329.  @deschan2246  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, and our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE Before the advent of high-speed rail, during Spring Festival, people in China return to our home province to celebrate the Chinese New Year with family and friends, and the whole journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high speed rail, the commuting time has been reduced from days to mere hours.
    3
  10330.  @mi_sally4852  China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, power stations, dams, ports, airports, etc in African countries and China has done much to improve Africa in just decades as compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. And some Chinese companies hire Chinese workers because our workers are most experienced and qualified when it comes to building infrastructure, so why can't Chinese companies deploy our own workers? Many African workers lack the necessary training and qualifications to build those infrastructure properly themselves.
    3
  10331.  @deschan2246   China is world's 3rd country to independently send people into space, after USA and USSR. Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program through Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtube.com/watch?v=tIviKg4Mduw China is the 1st Asian country to achieve independent human spaceflight, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, India, etc, have not conducted manned space missions of their own. China is helping make Asians proud by showing that Asians are just as capable of achieving equally impressive feats as Westerners.
    3
  10332.  @deschan2246  Throughout China's 5000 years of history, Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced their respective areas of history. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge much easier. The Compass made navigation much easier and hazardous journey's safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners using our inventions?
    3
  10333.  @joeburns88  During the Korean War, the People's Liberation Army were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were crappy, their supply lines over extended, their air support non-existent and they only had North Korean soldiers for allies. Whereas South Korea had the combined armies of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Greece, France, and 10 other nations on their side, they had superior weapons, better training, adequate air support and with Japan nearby providing logistical support. Yet the combined armies of 16 countries still DID NOT WIN the Korean War? Against poorly trained PLA soldiers? With only North Korean soldiers for allies?
    3
  10334.  @joeburns88  It's not as though Westerners did not copy from each other at one point. The 18th century Americans were copycats of European countries and violated many Intellectual Property rights during the heyday, according to this source: A nation of outlaws http://archive.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/26/a_nation_of_outlaws/ Here are some excerpts from the above source: Charles Dickens, who visited Boston in 1842, was, like many Britons, stunned by the economic ambition of American inhabitants, and appalled by what they would do for the sake of profit and he found the city's bookstores rife with pirated copies of his novels, along with those of his countrymen. Dickens would later deliver lectures decrying the practice, and wrote home in outrage: "my blood so boiled as I thought of the monstrous injustice." American food vendors tampered with their products en masse -- bulking out supplies with cheap filler, using dangerous additives to mask spoilage or to give foodstuffs a more appealing color. Candy was found to contain arsenic and dyed with copper chloride; conniving brewers mixed extracts of "nux vomica," a tree that yields strychnine, to simulate the bitter taste of hops. Pickles contained copper sulphate, and custard powders yielded traces of lead. Sugar was blended with plaster of Paris, as was flour. Milk had been watered down, then bulked up with chalk and sheep's brains. "Swill milk" taken from diseased cows force-fed a diet of toxic refuse produced by liquor distilleries was sold. In the literary realm, for most of the 19th century the United States remained an outlaw in the world of international copyright. The nation's publishers merrily pirated books without permission, and without paying the authors or original publishers a dime. 19th-century American producers churned out counterfeit products in remarkable quantities, slapping fake labels on locally made knockoffs of foreign ales, wines, gloves, and thread. As one expose at the time put it: "We have 'Paris hats' made in New York, 'London Gin' and 'London Porter' that never was in a ship's hold, 'Superfine French paper' made in Massachusetts." So America was copying Europe during the 19th century and that's how America became powerful and eventually overtook Britain as a superpower by the 20th century. And it looks as though China is set to dominate the 21st century, if you follow the trend according to Angus Maddison.
    3
  10335.  @deschan2246  In 2008, China conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut (Chinese astronaut) exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft and ventured into outer space, making China the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtube.com/watch?v=9PAkbT4kTpI&t=280 China is also the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, India, etc, have not conducted manned space missions of their own thus far. China is helping make Asians proud, by showing that Asians are not inferior to Westerners and we are just as capable of matching their achievements in space.
    3
  10336.  @mi_sally4852  What currency manipulation are you talking about? The U.S Treasury (again) says China is not manipulating currency in their report according to this source: US Treasury again says China is not manipulating currency channelnewsasia.com/news/business/us-treasury-again-says-china-is-not-manipulating-currency-11574532 so why do you believe all those unproven rumours about China manipulating our currency?
    3
  10337.  @mi_sally4852  What do you mean China's deserts are growing bigger because of deforestation? Hard working Chinese workers brave the desert heat to stuff grass into sand to keep desertification at bay for decades in this video: China's wisdom in taming the desert youtube.com/watch?v=YWIuqoi35Uw And Earth is greener largely thanks to China and India, Nasa satellite study finds youtube.com/watch?v=iw4cWe8afU8 NASA data shows a 5% increase in green over nearly two decades. One-third of the greening is due to human activity in China and India and China gets credit for about 25% of the expanded green area. The growth is mainly from Chinese forest conservation and tree planting
    3
  10338. @Cooper Kent Look at what your Malaysian President Dr. Mahathir had to say about China. Video: Dr Mahathir: We can learn a lot from China youtube.com/watch?v=zp5szs3AWCY&t=20 "I have been asked everywhere I go, "What do you think about China? Aren't you afraid of China?" I said, "There's nothing to be afraid of." We have had relations with China for almost 2,000 years, China never conquered us. But the Europeans came. Two years after they come here, they conquered us. So we are more afraid of the Europeans than we are of China." - Dr. Mahathir, Malaysian President.
    3
  10339.  @Andy-P  Made in China 2025 aims to upgrade the manufacturing capabilities of Chinese industries, moving China away from being a producer of cheap low-tech goods into a more technology-intensive powerhouse. Does it fit in the theme of improving oneself, not pulling others down?
    3
  10340.  @Andy-P  You said: "Thanks to all the state subsidies china could achieve this. By the way large state subsidies is against WTO rules." On Jan 26 2022, the WTO awarded China the right to impose $645 million of compensatory tariffs against the United States after the latter's anti-subsidy tariffs imposed on China in 2012. You're basically behaving like the U.S in this regard, hurling accusations of China's state subsidies that later turned out to be false.
    3
  10341.  @johncasey5594  "we would have stayed in Europe and not seen that there were entire undiscovered landmasses." Well, the American landmass would still exist either way, even if Europeans did not "discover" it. And in fact, Native American population would most likely number in the majority in their homeland, had America not been "discovered" by the Europeans.
    3
  10342. China publishes more scientific research papers than any other in the world.
    3
  10343.  @michaelkatz275  When is the last time you spoke to a Uighur in China?
    3
  10344. One thing I've realized over the course of years is that the "Nobel Peace Prize" has since deviated from it's original intention, and has long been hijacked and weaponized by the United States to wield against their opponents to promote U.S interests.
    3
  10345. ​ @s-man5647  "Except of course, Thailand was NEVER colonized by the US..." Thailand is NOT the Philippines, it's just the fallacy of false equivalence being applied here. Thailand has it's own unique circumstances that obviously differ from Philippines. Colonial mentality specifically affects the people living in former colonies, including India, Philippines and even Hong Kong. It's disingenuous to simply dismiss the existence of such a phenomena, when many former colonies have displayed traits of colonial mentality.
    3
  10346.  @s-man5647  "No, it comes from the fact that the Philippines continues to have massive military ties..." First you said: "Pinoys aren't victims of colonial mentality. They just happen to have friends and family in the US." Yet when I explain that these "friends and family in the US" were due Philippines being a former American colony (after losing the American-Philippine War) and some Filipinos became American citizens, you just dismiss it and suddenly bring up massive military ties while ignoring my point. "The Philippines was the ONLY US colony but clearly we are not the ONLY puppet." Precisely, so the colonial mentality continues to exist in the minds of Filipinos, because of the virtue that Philippines is a former US colony. Being a former colony means that colonial mentality will exist to a certain degree within the minds of the local people, and continuing to ignore the existence of this phenomena is simply being disingenuous that's all.
    3
  10347.  @s-man5647  "A small organized elite will almost always triumph over a disorganized mass. But that does not mean that the masses are to blame." If the masses already have a preconceived notion of inferiority towards a particular group (i.e colonial mentality) then it becomes all the more easier for the masses to be manipulated into adopting this sentiment. Therefore, it's widespread colonial mentality that makes Filipinos more readily believe what they are being told by the people above.
    3
  10348.  @elanor2123  Look at the African Americans getting shot/killed by police officers such as George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks, and so on, sparking off Black Lives Matter protests across the USA. Yet there's no person of African descent being killed by Chinese police officers. And while there might be racist comments on Chinese social media , its thanks to the Communist Party of China monitoring the Internet and censoring such racist comments.
    3
  10349. Chinese people make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, cheaply so that the cost of living in America is kept lower than it should be. Think of the millions of dollars Americans saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to Chinese goods. Money saved that can be spent on finer things like cars, houses, getting married, college tuition, etc.
    3
  10350. Liu Xiaobo is an example of person with mental colonization. Liu advocated for the Westernization of China, as well as the rejection of Chinese traditional culture. In an interview with Hong Kong magazine, Liu said: "modernization means wholesale westernization, choosing a human life is choosing a Western way of life... Westernization is not a choice of a nation, but a choice for the human race." Ai Weiwei is welcomed in the West because of his criticism towards the Chinese government. Germany welcomed him, until he started being critical of Germany and in 2019, he announced he would be leaving Berlin, saying that Germany is not an open culture.
    3
  10351.  @comradetirer  If Russia forces encircling Kiev are there to act as a distraction and lock down Ukrainians military while the real fighting takes places in the Donbas, then Russian Generals won't make the mistake of declaring that their primary objective is distraction, isn't it?
    3
  10352.  @comradetirer  "神州 Shenzhou still it took them 45 days" That bought the forces of the Donetsk and Lugansk republics 45 days of additional time to fight the Azov Battalion in Donbas region. That's the point of a distraction after all, to lock down the Ukrainian forces defending Kiev and prevent them from reinforcing the Donbas.
    3
  10353.  @comradetirer  "How is the Ukrainian army distracted if Russia is not in the Kiev region?" The Ukrainian Army is prevented from reinforcing the Azov Battalion fighting in the Donbas region, since they are bogged down by Russian forces encircling Kiev. Meanwhile, Russia deployed hypersonic missiles like the Kinzal (Dagger) to strike the Ukrainian ammo and fuel depots.
    3
  10354.  @comradetirer  Again, that's the whole point of a distraction, which is to occupy the enemy's attention while the real fighting takes places in Donbas region.
    3
  10355. +jack sparrow you're a broken tool, or a tool that refuses to work properly.
    3
  10356.  @MechMask  Thanks for the compliment, and good luck with your assignment on China's Social Credit System. But be warned, that your classmates may not take kindly to presenting the positive aspects of the Social Credit System. Seems like most people in the West have been "brainwashed" to overlook the positive aspects of the system, and only focus on the negative aspects that's all, and hardly anyone seems willing to go against the flow here.
    3
  10357.  Muhammad Ariq Muafan  But it's political incorrect to call it CCP, because it's name is zhōngguó gòngchǎndǎng 中国共产党 in which zhōngguó 中国 refers to China and gòngchǎndǎng 共产党 refers to Communist Party, so the correct name should be the CPC, not the CCP.
    3
  10358.  Tisha Misha  What's there for Cyrus to be ashamed about? For showcasing the Chinese government preservation of ethnic minorities language? Did you knew the Chinese RMB note contains ethnic minority languages until Cyrus pointed it out?
    3
  10359.  @ohdearearthlings1879  Nasty? But Nomad Capitalist was interviewing an American businessman, how does that term apply to him?
    3
  10360. It is apparent that sanctions do not work on North Korea, so why continue pursuing sanctions knowing that it has no effect. North Korea seems to target US military bases in South Korea and Okinawa Japan, so why not try different approach instead by withdrawing troops from those regions? That would do more to reduce tensions on Korean peninsula than any sanctions China applied on North Korea. Its crazy to keep on doing the same approach again and again, and expecting the results to be different.
    3
  10361.  @brexitgreens  This is what JaYoe Nation wrote: "Thanks for sharing Patrick's stories on the ground Cyrus. It's important to see ALL sides of an issue in order to have a clear impression of the whole." What I am doing is presenting an analogy in order to help explain the Ukraine crisis in the form of a family drama to hopefully make it more relatable to ordinary people.
    3
  10362.  @CyrusJanssen  "I asked Patrick the same question...why attack the entire country?" When Nazi Germany attacked Poland, why'd the Allies attack Germany? Instead of just limiting the fighting to Poland itself, the Allies eventually took the fighting to Germany itself. Because to stop the fighting, you'll have to target the root problem. Likewise, Ukraine and Donbas have been exchanging artillery fire for 8 years, in which over 13,000 people have been killed and of which 80% of civilian casualties occurred in Donbas region, so Russia targeted the root problem (which is Kiev support of ultra-nationalists and neo-nazis) You said: "I quoted Putin who said he doesn't believe Ukrainians are a different people. IMO Putin wants the whole country and will stop at nothing. It's wrong." While it's true that Putin said that Ukrainians and Russians were historically one people, Putin never said that he wants the whole country. The two peoples have shared historical origins but that does mean Russia wants Ukraine. Putin has also stated before that Russia has no plans to occupy Ukraine. In fact, many experts believe Russia doesn't have the capacity to annex Ukraine (the 2nd largest country in Europe) nor the resources to occupy Ukraine for an extended period of time.
    3
  10363.  @ziggyzugg  Russia is not actively targeting civilians. But the Ukrainian ultra-nationalist neo-Nazis are actively taking shelter in civilians structures like schools and hospitals, giving the Russian army no choice but to target them as well.
    3
  10364.  Karen Xitler  Chairman Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine caused by bad weather conditions such as flooding, destroying crops and resulting in poor harvest. Even Mao couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. Yet in the West, Mao Zedong is being labelled as "mass murderer" when the intent to kill isn't even there?
    3
  10365.  @never7298  muito obrigado.
    3
  10366.  @brexitgreens  "@神州 Shenzhou randomly hijacked @The JaYoe Nation thread only because the latter applauded @Cyrus Janssen for giving voice to both sides." No, I only posted 1 original comment to Jayoe Nation here on this thread, how's that hijacking? Meanwhile, other's have been hurling accusations at me, so the bulk of my posts is me responding that's all. You said: "He does make some compelling arguments and I enjoy a good challenge. But he resorts to spam." You literally posted more comments than me, but you suddenly deleted your previous comments and then accuse me of spamming?
    3
  10367.  @MarkYeung1  The master of disinformation is the one claiming Chairman Mao is a mass murderer, when the "intent to murder" isn't even present in Mao's actions.
    3
  10368.  @martinlaoshi  In your KFC-Burger King analogy, out of a total of 5 people, you want to go to BK, 2 people want to go KFC, and me and another shrugged and said nothing, so majority of us didn't agree with going to KFC (3 vs 2). Likewise, those who abstained from voting or voted in favor of Russia represent countries that didn't condemn Russia's military operation, including China, India, Pakistan and so on. And while it's true that if you count the countries themselves, majority of them voted against Russia. However if you take the combined population of countries that abstained or voted in support of Russia (including China, India, Pakistan, etc) our populations make up more than 50% of the world's entire population, so claiming that the world is against Russia's invasion isn't reality, because of the different populations of different countries. You said: "I wrote that the act of abstaining itself is not taking a position against the US, not that China never takes a position against the US after abstaining." But China abstained so according to your logic, China is not taking a position against the U.S, when that's clearly not the case in reality. Jake Sullivan and Joe Biden had meetings with Yang Jiechi and Xi Jinping, and it's clear from the outcome that U.S-China ties have deteriorated as a result of the Ukraine crisis, so it appears that only in your fantasy world is the act of abstaining itself is not taking a position against the US. Even India abstained, and USA is planning sanctions on India just like what USA did with China, with Anthony Blinken announcing fresh sanctions on Chinese officials. You said: "Again, abstaining does not mean that China's position will forever be the same after doing so." Forever is a long time, but it appears that for the moment and the near-future, China's position is going to be against U.S at least until USA changes their attitude towards China. You said: "You wrote that the act of abstaining was taking a position against the US hegemony. Not only from China, but from all the African countries and Latin American countries that abstained. that is obviously not true and that was what i was pushing back at." Well, for what reason did the African and Latin American countries either abstained or voted in support of Russia, if not pushing back against U.S attempts to maintain hegemonic control?
    3
  10369.  @martinlaoshi  Do you agree that abstaining from the vote, is basically the same as not condemning the Russian military operation? Then we are in agreement that China, India and others that abstained, aren't condemning Russia at the very least.
    3
  10370.  @martinlaoshi  The point is you accused me of making things up in my "little fantasy world" yet all my examples are grounded in reality, not the analogies or "schematic logical overview" as you call them, made up by you. Your theories function properly inside a perfect world, but the real world isn't like that, and those who abstained (i.e China, India, etc) in the UN vote are lumped together with those who explicitly voted in support of Russia. That's why Jake Sullivan and Joe Biden had meetings with Yang Jiechi and Xi Jinping, in their attempts to strong arm China to sanction Russia, even though China abstained. India too is being targeted, even though they abstained (like China) as Biden has described India as "somewhat shaky" by continuing to buy Russian commodities. I mean, even you at one point admitted that that the act of abstaining itself is not taking a position against the US, yet China abstaining and not taking a position against the US (in your own words) would "obviously be absurd." So you've basically dismantled your own argument, because China abstained, yet is being regarded as taking a position against the US.
    3
  10371.  @martinlaoshi  @Martin Bloks "神州 Shenzhou i did not say what you say i said. Kind of sad to be you. You really do live in your own little world." More insults? I've already explained that my examples are grounded in reality, that those who abstained and who voted in support of Russia are being lumped together in the same group that's refusing to condemn Russia. Even thought China and also India abstained, our countries are being regarded going against the U.S position. Yet you're accusing me of living in my "little fantasy world" when you're the one coming up with analogies and "schematic logical overviews" as you call them?
    3
  10372.  @nemaiemoskalia  "Firstly, Putin firstly became president in 2000, not in 2012," I'm still waiting for that guy to list which "ex-wife" was beaten up post 2012 (or post 2000) after Putin was in power. "The Revolution of Dignity started when students were cruelly beaten up by Yanukovych forces during peaceful demonstrations." So that's Ukrainian President Yanukovych forces, not Russian forces, does it have anything to do with Russia? Or is it just blaming Russia for the Maidan Coup in 2014 ousting Yanukovych by the USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Kiev? The leaked audio recordings by Victoria Nuland are proof of this. "And yes, Ukraine and Russia do have a long history together, but do you know that it was mostly dark and groomy?" Ukraine was arguably at it's most prosperous as part of the Soviet Union. The Soviets industrialized Ukraine, introducing the 4th Five-Year Plan in 1946. which proved to be a remarkable success, and can be likened to the "wonders of West German and Japanese reconstruction", but without foreign capital; the Soviet reconstruction is historically an impressive achievement. The workforce had increased from 1.2 million in 1945 to 2.9 million in 1955; an increase of 33.2 percent over the 1940-level. The result of this remarkable growth was that by 1955 Ukraine was producing 2.2 times more than in 1940, and the republic had become one of the leading producers of certain commodities in Europe. Ukraine was the largest per-capita producer in Europe of pig iron and sugar, and the second-largest per-capita producer of steel and of iron ore, and was the third largest per-capita producer of coal in Europe. All achieved while Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union. "Do you think that modern unit would be better?" The modern Ukraine today is arguably the poorest country in Europe how would it have done better? I'm willing to hear you out, but you just give vague statements without supporting evidence.
    3
  10373.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  China has lifted 700 million people out of poverty in just 40 years. Just for comparison, the entire African population is about 1.2 billion, so China lifted a figure equal to HALF of Africa's entire population out of poverty in just decades, as compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. Video: Historical achievement: Take 700 million out of poverty youtu.be/CljWffPgmG8 "China has lifted 728 million people out of poverty by international standards." - John Ross, Well-known columnist in UK, Former Deputy mayor of London.
    3
  10374.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  China has produced many successful Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, ZTE, LENOVO, DJI, Haier, Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, NetEase, Meituan-Dianping, Bank of China, ICBC, AgBank, China Construction Bank, Ping An Insurance, Sinopec Group, China National Petroleum, China Minmetals, China State Construction, and the list goes on. Many of these companies have successfully made it onto business magazines like Forbes Global 2000 and Fortune Global 500 Sources: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies Forbes Global 2000 wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Global_2000 Fortune Global 500 wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_Global_500 But where are all the famous companies from India?
    3
  10375.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  You mock our Made in China brands, then why Indian PM Narendra Modi wants to pursue a Made in India initiative?
    3
  10376.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  Besides smartphones, Chinese companies also dominate the Top 10 Dronemakers in 2019 and Chinese company DJI is world's largest civilian drone maker according to the following source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 3. 3dr (American) 4. Yuneec (Chinese) 5. EHang (Chinese) 6. Walkera (Chinese) 7. Syma (Chinese) 8. Autel Robotics (American) 9. Blade (French) 10. Hubsan (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 top10drone.com/top-drone-companies/
    3
  10377.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    3
  10378. Trooper1139 China has the world's largest Internet population by number of users, and in fact, Mandarin Chinese is the 2nd most common language in the Internet right after English, so why do you claim China don't allow Internet?
    3
  10379.  @bensanderson7144  If you want to talk about prison populations then it's actually America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate
    3
  10380.  @MarkYeung1  Yes, I already gave an example of Philippines Coastguard (patrol boat Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) shooting to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman Hong Shicheng (洪石成) but that Filipino guy gave no example of Filipino fishermen shot to death by Chinese coastguard. It's obvious which country is bullying others here.
    3
  10381.  The Hate Factory  Under Chairman Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979, how is Mao Zedong a mass murderer?
    3
  10382.  @MarkYeung1  Canada is not the only country that has extradition treaty with USA. It was revealed that in the three months after the warrant was issued, Meng Wanzhou had previously visited six countries that have extradition treaties with the US, namely Britain, Ireland, Japan, France, Poland and Belgium. None of those six mentioned countries choose to act on the extradition agreement. Only Canada was willing to act upon this extradition.
    3
  10383.  @neilhallam8028  You asked: "How is china today as only officials can use YouTube on a vpn ??" Says who? Haven't you heard of Chinese vlogger (李子柒) Liziqi? Her YouTube channel has more than 2.7 billion views and 16 million subscribers, as verified on 21 August 2021, which is a Guinness World Record for "The most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube". Yet you're saying only officials can use YouTube on a VPN?
    3
  10384.  @neilhallam8028  "Shenzhou. yes as long as it fits the narrative. Until she disappeared." LiZiQi has put her vlogger career on hiatus due to a legal dispute with her business partners. Li stated that "she does not want to see her intellectual property over-commercialized." How does that equate to not fitting the narrative?
    3
  10385.  @Andy-P  That's where China's government policy measures comes into play. According to a Reuters poll of 11 economists, the prices of new homes in China are now expected to climb 3% this year after a slew of policy measures. Also, new home prices will likely rise according to the article.
    3
  10386.  @neilhallam8028  "Shenzhou. don't believe statements.. wow your nieve... you can not become influential amd not toe the party line." Who are you calling naive? Explain which of Li's videos did not tow the party line then, since you think you're so clever. You're the one claiming that "only officials can use YouTube on a VPN" yet even after I've proven you wrong, you just call me naive without even bothering to explain anything.
    3
  10387. Asian dramas are all the rage right now. Western dramas is boring by comparison.
    3
  10388.  The Snurger  Why not attempt to refute others points instead of mocking others for their views? Just because they views happen to differ from yours?
    3
  10389.  @Stopinvadingmyhardware  "I only ask, because I wanted to understand how this situation might be perceived by someone from outside of that industry." Perhaps may I suggest listening to the Silk and Steel podcast by Carl Zha and Xiangyu to get a different perceptive? Xiangyu is a Taiwanese rapper and he gives an insightful view into the politics of the US-Taiwan-mainland China relations.
    3
  10390.  @cedricdellafaille1361  You said: "in fact taiwan is one of the most freedom of speech countries in the whole world." Firstly, you're wrong in the fact that Taiwan is not a country. Till today, Taiwan has not formally declared any independence, and even its own constitution follows that of the Republic of China (meaning that it's part of China). Even during his visit to Beijing, Anthony Blinken outright stated that the U.S does not support Taiwan independence. Secondly, what makes you think mainland Chinese aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Before 2019, everyone has heard of mainland Chinese tourists visiting your countries as well as Chinese international students studying in your schools and universities, yet you seem to think Chinese aren't free?
    3
  10391.  @cedricdellafaille1361  Copying? Where did Taiwan learn their chip fabrication technology if not copied from the West? Mainland China has many well-known companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Vivo, as compared to Taiwanese companies, yet you're claiming that Taiwan leads in technological advancement? Where are all the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to mainland China? "Taiwan is a very formidable country or state whatever your thinking is, the people over there do have an imagination that innovate and create new technology" Same as mainland China. For example, China has even sent people into space. In October 2003, Yang Liwei (杨利伟) became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program on board the Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft, making China the 3rd country in the world to have sent people into space, after USA and Russia.
    3
  10392.  @Andy-P  "But recently China has hit a lot of head winds - Property crisis, Covid, world relations, slowing economy." If anything, China's handling of Covid-19 has actually boosted Chinese citizens support for the Communist Party of China. The 2018 World Values Survey reported that 95% of Chinese citizens said that they have a great deal or quite a lot of trust in national government. Comparatively, about 69% felt the same way about their local government. After the pandemic, the data show that Chinese citizens’ trust in their national government increased to 98%. Their trust in local government also increased compared to 2018 levels — 91% of Chinese citizens surveyed now said they trust or trust completely the township-level government. Trust levels rose to 93% at the county level, 94% at the city level and 95% at the provincial level. Source: The Washington Post The survey was in collaboration with 17 Chinese academics, they recruited more than 600 students from 53 universities across China to conduct one-on-one interviews online. In the end, they interviewed 19,816 individuals from 31 provinces or provincial-level administrative regions across China. As for world relations, just recently, the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua switched their recognition of Taipei to Beijing, recognising the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 instead of the Republic of China 🇹🇼 so world relations for the PRC is definitely improving. Didn't the USA recently applied for 18 officials to attend the 2022 Beijing Olympics despite Biden administration announcing a diplomatic boycott? Video: US applies for 18 officials to attend Beijing Olympics despite boycott announcement youtu.be/Vg3WyImPe7w
    3
  10393.  @MarkYeung1  Good News! China Evergrande Group said it has resumed construction at most of its housing projects. Evergrande said it has restarted nearly 92% of its property projects, compared with just about 50% at the beginning of September, according to a company statement. The number of workers involved in the projects that have resumed building has risen 31% from September to 89,000, so this is good news for China's property market.
    3
  10394.  @lakvenk6554  China has to host the world's largest population, so its possible that there are simply not enough resources, not enough schools, not enough jobs for everyone in China. With such a huge student population, competition for top schools and higher education is extremely fierce and intense here in China. Some students unable to apply for local universities, so they may choose to study abroad (especially if their parents have $$$) Some graduates unable to find work in China, so they seek employment opportunities abroad as well. That's why Western countries are positively flooded with Chinese international students, competing with local students in tests, exams, for university spots and even job offers when they graduate. If overseas Chinese can't find a job in the West, they are always welcome to come back to China (thus saving China the resources needed to train this student to university degree) and bringing foreign knowledge and technology to our shores. If overseas Chinese find a job in your country, they are depriving a Western graduate of a job, and if they rise to high position in corporate or government posts, then they might get approached by the communist party to be recruited as a spy in Western countries. Whichever way you look at it, China wins.
    3
  10395.  Charles Schmidd  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    3
  10396.  Charles Schmidd  Where's your verified source showing actual Uighur numbers, if you disregard my sources?
    3
  10397.  @monkeeseemonkeedoo3745  Previously, China was suffering from overpopulation, high infant mortality rates, high child malnutrition, high illiteracy. Poor families in China had multiple kids resulting in too many mouths to feed and not enough money for healthcare or to send all those kids to school. Many kids did not make it to adulthood, succumbed to childhood diseases, or they grew up without attending school because their parents could only afford to send one kid to school. So instead of this, why not make poor families pool their resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood and enroll him in school?
    3
  10398.  @monkeeseemonkeedoo3745  That's why the One Child Policy was necessary at that time. The One Child Policy limited population size to prevent China from being overwhelmed by our population. Instead of poor families spreading their resources thin raising multiple kids, they only had to raise a single healthy kid and send him to school, and after he graduate, he'll find work to lift the family out of poverty. According to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty; China's poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015. China's infant mortality rate was halved, and illiteracy rates were halved as well. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%.
    3
  10399. Since the 19th century, many have grown so thoroughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the rise of a non-Western power like China is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    3
  10400.  @hermanbagaskara5926  Hong Kong actually held more elections after the 1997 handover back to mainland China, than it ever did under British colonial rule for over 150 years. You're just talking about hypothetical scenario in which HK remained part of Britain instead of being returned back to China. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former colonies, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration, just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    3
  10401.  @rpg1663  So in other words, you're saying China started from relatively backward position compared to London, yet in just 20 years, China's infrastructure advanced more than London's for the last 100 years? That just shows what Chinese people are capable of.
    3
  10402. 对哦，其实中国防疫已经救了他一命，但他还是忘恩负义。
    3
  10403. The most important thing right now is for Meng Wanzhou to come home after 3 long years, since her detention in 2018. Paying fines or threatening to sue can come later, Meng's return to China is of the utmost priority now that the case is concluded.
    3
  10404. If a leader has shown to be strong and capable of the position, then whats wrong with extending his presidential term for a while longer, in order to maximize the benefits of his rule on China? China should follow our own path to success, not just blindly follow Western government system.
    3
  10405.  @junebug8485  I refer you to an article entitled: 11 Things You Should Know About Chiang Kai-shek (by Culture Trip) Chiang kai-Shek served in the Japanese Army from 1909 to 1911. He purged communists from KMT and their removal of Communists from within the ranks allowed him free reign to give himself what amounted to dictatorial power over much of China. When the Japanese invaded Manchuria, Chiang refused to face the Japanese invaders, until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap him to get him to ally with the communists in a united front against the Japanese. (Xi'an Incident) Additionally, the Communists actually saved his leadership, and it’s often forgotten that without the Communists’ help, Chiang would never have survived as a political force, since was the communists who convinced the officers to release Chiang and allow him to take control of the government once again. Chiang’s efforts against the Japanese gained him some influential friends. And although the Communist General Mao was responsible for much of the damage inflicted upon the Japanese, it was Chiang who got the credit mainly from Britain and the US. When civil war broke out in China, Chiang expected help from the allies, but after a long campaign against both the Japanese and the Germans, the US and Britain were reluctant to get involved in a civil war. His Western ‘friends’ literally abandoned him. He suppressed local culture in Taiwan (White Terror) and was responsible for the imprisonment of 140,000 Taiwanese. These people were taken captive for their alleged opposition to the KMT. At this time, anyone openly criticizing the ruling party was deemed a Communist sympathizer. He held the Taiwan presidency for 25 years. He held the Taiwan under a permanent state of martial law, thus ensuring his power was absolute. In fact, the constitution only allowed for two terms in power, but with martial law as his excuse, Chiang could rule indefinitely.
    3
  10406.  @Redfvvg  It was conducted by a reputable organisation like PISA. Not only that but China is home to more STEM graduates (Science Technology Engineering Mathematics) than any other in the world. 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) ... (Source: World Economic Forum)
    3
  10407.  @MarkYeung1  Previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held in Hong Kong while it was a British colony. It's during the period of Hong Kong's 1997 handover that Hong Kong people finally get to vote for their favourite leaders under the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy today, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony? Even today, Hong Kong has their own government separate from the mainland, and Hong Kong holds elections like HK Chief Executive Carrie Lam winning the 2017 election, and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's election.
    3
  10408.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Just this month (July 2021) tens of thousands of HK people emigrated for the same reason." It's possible these tens of thousands of HK people were the rioters that threw rocks, broke into stores and looted, burn shops and now they want to seek asylum in other countries after committing chaos in Hong Kong, in the name of so-called "freedom".
    3
  10409.  @nuckingfuts3204  China has world's largest population, so is possible not enough resources, not enough schools, not enough jobs for everyone in China. With such large student populations, competition for top schools and higher education in China is extremely fierce and intense. Some students don't make it to local university, so they choose to study abroad in Western universities (especially if they have $$$) That's why Western universities are positively flooded with international exchange students from China, studying the same topics as their peers and competing with local Western students in exams and for university spots (and job offers when they graduate). If you don't believe me, then ask your local university students how they feel about the Chinese competition in their universities.
    3
  10410.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "China needs to understand the Western human right perspectives when it deals with Hong Kong." Hong Kong was literally taken from China by the British. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    3
  10411. April is already last month and now US and S. Korea are conducting military exercise even in May?
    3
  10412. +john montoya I mean, if Kim agreed to dismantle his nuclear weapon facilities, then shouldn't USA at least agree not to hold exercises with South Korea, as a simple gesture of good faith? Why continue to provoke N. Korea even before the meeting? Now China has to step in and attempt to get NK back to the negotiation table, after USA chase it away.
    3
  10413. +john montoya The actual conflict is between N. Korea, S. Korea and USA, not China. At the most, China can only act as mediator for the countries to settle their conflicts. I mean, its all thanks to Kim visiting Beijing by train, that China was able to grant President Trump a chance to talk with Kim, but now, USA want's to ruin its chances by conducting military exercises? Once in 1 Apr, and now in May as well? Until China has to help persuade Kim back to table again for Americans?
    3
  10414. ​ @LetterSignedBy51SpiesWasA-Coup  It is from Chinese Proverb, 手中无剑，心中有剑。 (No sword in hand, but having one in the heart.) It means to appear harmless, while concealing a dagger behind your back.
    3
  10415.  @holybutterfly8495  China does have free public healthcare which is under the country's social insurance plan. The healthcare system provides basic coverage for the majority of the native population and, in most cases, expats as well.
    3
  10416.  @holybutterfly8495  China is NOT Australia (neither is Australia China) yet why are you seemingly wanting to impose an Australian system onto China?
    3
  10417. Corruption afflicts every country to a certain degree, but at least under President Xi there are crackdowns on corruption within the communist party and more than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption in China, including over 120 high-ranking officials, including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders.
    3
  10418.  @holybutterfly8495  You said: "神州 Shenzhou It doesn’t matter work for China or not but most of the people like to come to Australia just because this 2 systems" Australia is actually facing a shortage of foreign workers, are you sure this program works by providing jobless people money when Australia needs foreign workers?
    3
  10419.  @Something-tz2vw  Look, you can drop the pretense. It's apparent that you harbor animosity towards mainland Chinese, why pretend that you have a deep fondness for Chinese culture and history? Seriously, you blindly throw in your support with the Philippines, without even understanding the historical context, yet in your next post you claim fondness for Chinese history. You claimed that my "facts" are BS, except to mainland Chinese, yet when I ask you to point out which of my facts are BS, you change the topic to the weather. It's all a pretense to you that's all.
    3
  10420. @Sheriff Lobo There's no indication in your comment that you were being sarcastic. Usually if one is being sarcastic, they'll need to overly exaggerate so that people know that they're being sarcastic, but there no indication of that in your post.
    3
  10421. Xi Jinping is looking forward to the year 2050 whereas Joe Biden wants to bring USA back to 1950 when USA was powerful.
    3
  10422.  @bwmrtham5730  "神州 Shenzhou the funny part was the US government kept doing it again and again..." And another funny part is that USA doesn't care about democracy in other countries, as long as those countries have a leader that supports the US's interests (even at the expense of their own citizen's interests).
    3
  10423.  @primeroultimo  From your words, I presume that you voted for Biden over Trump in the 2020 Presidential Election? But under Biden's leadership, 13 American soldiers lost their lives as a result of Joe Biden's blunder in Afghanistan, so doesn't it mean that voting against someone is just as bad? And you earlier, you boasted about the US being the richest (21 trillion) most powerful (miltary) country in the world, yet the US Army still lost the 20-year Afghan War against a bunch of insurgents? Who's going to believe in US military might, given that they just lost to a bunch of insurgents in Afghanistan?
    3
  10424. NATO is like the Hare, rushing to slap sanctions on Russia and pour weapons into Ukraine, until they have exhausted their sanction options and run out of weapons to send, all the while mocking Russia for being too slow. Meanwhile, Russia is the Tortoise, making slow but steady progress towards the finish line.
    3
  10425.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou LinkedIn failed in China because they failed to understand Chinese GOVERNMENT's mindset." Could you elaborate how? The Chinese government clearly spelled out the rules for LinkedIn to continue operating in China, that they'll need to adhere to better privacy protection of users data, so they clearly understood what needs to be done to continue operating in China. Because when you hear news reports of social media websites leaking user's data, it usually stems from the Western companies like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter.
    3
  10426. Chinese workers manufacture products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, sneakers, clothing, etc, cheaply so that inflation in America is kept to a minimum and the cost of living is lower than it should be. Think of the millions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on finer things like cars, housing, getting married, or on things like school fees, college tuition, hospital bills, etc.
    3
  10427. In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, reining them in when they go out of hand. In the United States however, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    3
  10428.  @DZ477  The Chinese government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and halt production, impose lockdown, closing tourist attractions, banning mass gatherings, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and contain the virus. It's finally paying off now that the virus is under control and China is slowly reopening our economy. But in Western countries like US and UK, their economies are too precious to sacrifice so human health has to be sacrificed instead. Donald Trump wants to reopen the economy by Easter and Boris Johnson is relying on "herd immunity" to pull through.
    3
  10429.  @patrikpass2962  Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that the cost of living in America is kept lower than it should be. Think about the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent elsewhere, on cars, housing, luxury brands, rent and so on. Isn't that the reason why many Americans often flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money on living expenses?
    3
  10430. In Western countries, there are jobless people who live off government welfare and survive by collecting foodstamps, instead of actually getting a job. Meanwhile, the people who are actually working, pay taxes to support such a system. What China is doing is following a meritocratic system, where people are rewarded based on performance, and people who have a low credit score have to actually do something to contribute back to society
    3
  10431. Why should comments I posted elsewhere on YT matter to a discussion on this video here? Those comments were posted on other videos, and my comments posted here have nothing to do with them.
    3
  10432. So why should comments posted on other videos, matter to this video on "China Gamifies Life, Installs Social Credit System" Other videos have their own topics and their own comments, so what have they got to do with comments posted here?
    3
  10433. Talk about state-sponsored propaganda, Twitter is clearly one, and you can find so many examples in Western social media too.
    3
  10434. Americans also stole Germany technology after WW2. At the start of WW2, American tanks were inferior to German tanks, but after absorbing German Panzer (tank) technology, American tanks became more powerful. The Nazi Airforce (Luftwaffe) aircraft designs were so successful, that Americans copied the aircraft designs after Germany's surrender. Even the Nazi V2 Rocket Scientists were put to work by NASA on their Moon landing missions. Source: One of the greatest ripoffs of all time was the theft of German patents after World War II wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/patents.html
    3
  10435. Prince Harry is not the leader of the UK, which would be British PM Theresa May.
    3
  10436.  @everythingandmore5537  No good? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    3
  10437. Western MSM will undoubtedly frame the Xinjiang agricultural produce in a negative light to their audiences, claiming that the athletes are eating food obtained through so-called "Uighur slave labour"
    3
  10438. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms and would have probably done a 5th term if she didn't voluntarily withdrew her candidacy from the last German election. Chinese President Xi Jinping is only entering his 3rd term, yet he's being labelled as a dictator for life?
    3
  10439.  @benproffitt5957  "神州 Shenzhou don’t kid yourself. It’s all about dominance no matter which country is on top." Like I said, a multipolar world is one where there is dominance of multiple voices, rather than the unipolar world where a single voice dominates (namely that of the U.S and it's "allies").
    3
  10440.  @geopoliticsjunkie4114  I'm sure that if you dig deep enough, you can find atrocities committed by Amnesty International even as long ago as the 80's. The Empire wasn't born yesterday, neither were it's tactics.
    3
  10441. @CCP's GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG Dr Li Wenliang was a communist party member himself and it's not that he disagreed with the CPC, he actually said on his private WeChat group that "Don't circulate the information outside of this group, tell your family and loved ones to take precautions." (大家不要外传，让家人情人注意防范) So he wasn't really a whistle-blower like Western media said.
    3
  10442.  @reel1tv587  Look at African Americans getting shot/killed by police officers such as George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks, and so on, sparking off Black Lives Matter protests across the USA. Yet you want to complain about how Chinese treat Africans? Which people of African descent has been killed by Chinese police?
    3
  10443.  @martinfiedler4317  You are correct that only a small percentage of people in Taiwan are separatists and that the majority of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo. But the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to its constitution, then by default Taiwan is part of China and any move to declare independence would be taken as changing the status quo (an outcome that many people in Taiwan do not support.
    3
  10444.  @martinfiedler4317  "Both, the ROC and the PRC are sovereign countries." If you think Taiwan is sovereign, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? What's preventing them from doing so?
    3
  10445.  @ChairmanMeow-fv5ym  If Taiwan is the true China, then why'd the KMT lose the mainland to the CPC and had to flee to Taiwan island? Shouldn't the True Chinese government remain in the mainland instead of running away?
    3
  10446.  @martinfiedler4317  You said: "If you believe that there is a respective statement in the ROC-constitution, then specify it." The proof is in the name of the constitution itself, the Constitution of the Republic of China. You said: "Thus, making the so-called 'Republic of China' already a purely Taiwanese polity." It's literally in the name itself, the Republic of China, that Taiwan calls itself. Otherwise, where is Taiwan's formal declaration of independence?
    3
  10447.  @martinfiedler4317  You said: "It has no bearing on the matter discussed here: that Taiwan is a sovereign country, separate and distinct from the PRC" Then why is it that Taiwan cannot join the UN like a sovereign country can? Is there something preventing Taiwan from doing so? Why is it that Taiwan can only compete in the Olympics under the name "Chinese Taipei"?
    3
  10448.  @martinfiedler4317  "The government in charge of Taiwan used to own all of China and bravely fought off the imperialist Japanese forces," When Imperial Japan invaded Manchuria, KMT General Chiang kai-shek was reluctant to face the Japanese. Instead he continued purging communists (our fellow Chinese) instead of meeting the invaders. So much until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap him to get him to ally with the CPC. This incident was known as the Xi'an Incident. (Source: Wikipedia: Xi'an Incident) Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was thanks to communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release. Only then was Chiang willing to form a united front with the CPC to fight the Japanese invaders.
    3
  10449. About USA's Free Market vs China's Planned Economy, the global economy is just like a untamed, raging river, constantly in flux and flowing according to economic forces. Would you let the river flow uncontrollably and cause widespread damage to your markets? Because that's what USA is doing with its "free trade", flooding local markets with Chinese goods, while letting the big US corporations like Nike and Apple "escape" to other countries for the cheaper labor force there. China's approach is to "tame the river" and control it to maximize the benefits to China. Our local companies would die if exposed directly to foreign competition, so instead the government shields them and provide a safe haven for Chinese companies in China. Once our companies are developed enough to stand on their own, then they can start venturing into global markets. Huawei is one example of a Chinese company that is beginning to branch out into the rest of the world. So isn't this a better method? For the country to control the economy, instead of letting the economy control your country?
    3
  10450. +Kaimanfrosty China's economy was Communist under Mao Zedong, and when Deng Xiaoping introduced economic reforms to China, China was just beginning the switch from communist market to capitalist, so plenty of laws, rules, regulations were not established, and our foundation was weak and more used to communist system. So how can you start talking about the economy being specialized already to strengths and weakness inline with foreign economies? Our economy completely different to the rest of the world at that time. Back then we had just made the switch so we have to take extra precautions, instead of just letting foreign companies have the advantage. And we want to motivate Chinese companies so the government gave incentives to them. So whats wrong with this? The government needs to maintain control over the economy, otherwise its quite possible China's economy would have broken (similar to USSR collapse) when China made the switch from communist market to capitalist. 2) "The size of population doesn't have much of an effect on growth" What sort of logic is this? You have to raise people out of poverty and a larger population in poverty means more work needs to be done. Hong Kong's population is smaller than China's so the poor people in HK is less than poor people in the mainland, so why make such comparison at all? India has many port cities too. Did you look at the shape of India and notice how much of India touches the Indian Ocean? India has a coastline spanning 7516.6 kilometres, forming one of the biggest peninsulas in the world and around 95 per cent of India's trading by volume and 70 per cent by value is done through maritime transport. So why use Hong Kong simply because its a small port city? 3) I never said people or companies shouldn't seek profit, I merely stated that state-controlled companies have goals aligned with the state, whereas corporations would follow their own agenda (which is profit most of the time) America's economy is great, because American corporations are great, but not much of this wealth is experienced by the middle and lower income groups. That's why Americans complain about being part of the 99%, and the 1% (the big US corporations) control most of America's wealth. At least by being state-controlled, the Chinese government has some control over directing the profits elsewhere, such as into developing the poorer regions in Western China. About US crisis, the US government steps in, but then the US has had the Great Depression before the 2008 financial crisis. China's economy is not as old as USA, but thus far, China has not encountered any economic crisis, because the government is constantly controlling it, reading its economic signs and making decisions with regards to China's economic future. The Chinese state-controlled corporations tend to have a big picture of China's economy, whereas US companies have only a limited view of the big picture of US economy. And each US corporation strives to pull US economy in different directions. I too don't claim to be overly familiar about aviation industry. but the duopoly held by Boeing (USA) and Airbus (EU) prevents other countries from manufacturing their own jumbojet liner to compete with them. Otherwise, other countries would have come up with their own passenger airliner, but the presence of Boeing and Airbus makes it very difficult for them to enter the industry. As for China's C919 Comac it makes use of mostly domestic parts. Even the Jet Engine is homemade, with special single-crystal rhenium superalloy turbine blades that can withstand the necessary high temperatures encountered in Jet engines. Video: China Makes C919 and J-20 Engines with Rhenium Superalloy youtube.com/watch?v=DnwZmDOR1Rk 4) Can I ask how is China's "allocative efficiency of resources" is too tight? Chinese government has been known for being efficient and when they want something done, they get it done. For example, China had plans to build a hydroelectric station, and they went a head with its construction, even when there was protest against the destruction of Chinese cultural sites and displacement of villagers. But if you had taken all these people's views into consideration, then China would never have gotten the project done. Today, China's Three Gorges Dam is the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, and has been supplying China with clean renewable energy since its opening, to fuel China's growth. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtube.com/watch?v=b8cCsUBYSkw So it shows China's government efficiency in allocating resources to plan our future. Its all part of a planned economy isn't it? As for USA, its their own solution to their own problem, but by taxing import of foreign goods, you are also creating entity with your allies, and countries like Canada and India haven't been too happy with US slapping tariffs on steel and aluminum, without going through the proper WTO channels. India takes U.S. steel tariffs complaint to the WTO reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-india/india-takes-u-s-steel-tariffs-complaint-to-the-wto-idUSKCN1IO1WP Canada files WTO challenge of U.S. tariffs globalnews.ca/news/4248573/canada-wto-challenge-eu-trade-war/ 5) Since other countries (African countries, India, etc) seem unable to match China's more than half a billion out of poverty in decades, then why did you say earlier that "The claim that it is somehow unique to china is a misnomer" ? Can other countries match what China achieved, size for size? Indian can't make great progress, because the Indian goverment is too wrapped up with what Indians think themselves. The government can't proceed with big projects, because the Indians will protest. If they want to build a big dam like China, they'll have millions of protest that stop the project before it can even begin. Singapore has many government-owned companies (Singapore Airlines, Mediacorp, Singtel, SMRT, ST engineering, etc) but many of them stay in Singapore and Singapore has a small population so its doesn't have many well-known Singaporean enterprises that have struck it big without being government-controlled. But China has much higher population, more Chinese startups and Alibaba, Huawei, Tencent have become global Chinese brands. 5) Soviet Union were trying to introduce too many reforms at once and social unrest came about because people wanted more of the West. Westerners always complain about China's Tiananmen Incident, but if the government didn't do what needed to be done, China would most likely have dissolved just like Soviet Union. We would lose Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and China would be a bunch of different provinces (like USSR) instead of the unified power China is today. You are correct that they had bigger guns. So USA decide to sanction Russia after its collapse, because USA now has the bigger guns. The think with Westerners is that why is it they think China has no right to do what they did in the past? Who do they think they are? For example, pollution, the West has been polluting the Earth for 300 years since Industrial Revolution in 1700s, yet China industrialized only 40 years ago. And the West is powerful today because it industrialized much earlier. So why the apparent double standards between China and the West? We are only doing what West did centuries ago. If you think what China doing is wrong, then you are welcome to try and stop China and hinder our growth.
    3
  10451.  @Longtack55  In response to Singapore's sanctions, Russia put Singapore on a list of "unfriendly countries" so how is this a wise course of action?
    3
  10452.  @indexfinisher  If Singapore truly has good governance, then why did they make an enemy out of Russia? Singapore joined the West in imposing sanctions on Russia in 2022, while other ASEAN countries didn't.
    3
  10453.  @theo1216  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 - 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 - 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 - 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 - 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    3
  10454.  @jaimemartinez9792  What IS the Chinese way? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    3
  10455. Hegemonic too.
    3
  10456. +Voltage Drop Alex Mercer clearly said "Most of the Top 20 most polluted are actually in other countries" so why are you giving him the 494 cities on that list? Even the OP said "15 of the top 20 most polluted cities in the world are in China." (which is false according to Alex Mercer) so why are you bringing up 494 cities?
    3
  10457.  @MarkYeung1  That's why I specifically mentioned: "Eastern culture". It should be noted that much of Eastern culture is actully derived from China. For example, the Japanese Kanji (漢字) is derived from Chinese Hanzi (汉字) and the traditional Han clothing Hanfu (汉服) formed the basis of Japanese Kimono and Korean Hanbok.
    3
  10458. USA has 78.000 north American soldiers in the region, so why not withdraw all of them from the region instead? Since N. Korea missile can't reach USA mainland, it would result in peaceful solution for all parties. N. Korean citizen only support Kim because Kim focus their anger on USA. By withdrawing US troops, you take alway the focus of their anger, and they will turn it against their leader instead.
    2
  10459. +Banana Maybe USA can start slowly, like maybe 20-40% troop removal, then get Kim to sit down to denuclearization talks and promise more troop removal if he commits to complete disarmament. I also feel bad about South Korea having to fend for itself, but this is their Korean civil war and should be solved by Koreans themselves. Otherwise, is USA going to keep on shielding S. Korea forever? If negotiation with Kim failed, at least USA will have 20-40% less troops in S. Korea, making S. Korean government have to work harder to invest more resources in their defense. USA also saves money on upkeep of US bases. I heard Trump wanted to reduce military expenditure in NATO, so why not do the same thing in East Asia?
    2
  10460. +Croatian Knight So your typical response to force, is force? That would only lead to war, sooner or later. Might I add that Trump is the one sending aircraft carrier battlegroup to N. Korea and provoking it? N. K missiles cant even reach the US mainland so just how is the USA threatened by N.K actions?
    2
  10461. North Korea always threaten US airbases in South Korea, Okinawa Japan and Guam, so how do you expect Chinese government to diffuse the situation at all? N. Korea cares more about USA, than China, so why don't USA withdraw its forces from those above places instead? Imposing economic sanctions on N. Korea is not going to solve the issue at all, as it hasn't for many years.
    2
  10462. I like how this guy gets so many likes and comments on his post. All he needed to do was to state his nationality.
    2
  10463. +puchy110 I agree, the stakes are getting higher with each progressive war. The problem is, which unlucky country is going to become their battleground.
    2
  10464. Kong Wee Peh Yes those regions are growing. But somehow, US seems to want to stick it's head into their business. Why not let the Asians settle it themselves? We are capable of thought and foresight and know that trading is still the most beneficial solution.
    2
  10465. But the US presence is only emboldening Japan and Philippines into provoking China to be more aggressive. China is growing and needs more resources but is being blocked in all sides by the US.
    2
  10466. +puchy110 Those are air bases. China is not the first one to build those. Vietnam, Philippines and Malaysia all have airstrips there before China started building. And sending spy planes and stealth bombers is not really considered deployment of assets.
    2
  10467. +puchy110 Yes, resources in East Asia belongs to East Asian countries. Some will go to China, some to Japan and some to SE Asian countries but the US also wants a piece of that pie. US is the non-claimant here that is trying to make China seem like aggressive one here. US has plenty of military bases all over the world, but makes a lot of noise when China builds one near its own waters. China is not the only one with military bases overseas. Many other countries build bases all over the globe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_overseas_military_bases China is not obstructing traffic flow; many ships and commercial aircraft use South China Sea route daily and China has billions of dollars of trade flowing through the region. Why would she obstruct such a valuable trade route? http://static.businessinsider.com/image/54e66f606bb3f77c0a018299/image.jpg US selling arms to its allies is only contributing to destabilization of the region. US has been supplying the Middle East with arms and allows Al Qaeda and ISIS to come to power in order to keep the region conflicted. US is now slowly doing the same to East Asia to prevent East Asian countries from rising.
    2
  10468. puchy110​ Yes, hopefully Trump can see that Taiwan president is also using him to help Taiwan claim independence. It's a noble cause, but is it worth getting into a world war over? A lot of lives are at stake here.
    2
  10469. puchy110 Regarding Liu Bang, yes he did that. Virtually every Chinese dynasty has contributed in some way to expansion of the Great Wall. That is why the Great Wall is not only a physical barrier but also a symbol of China's long lineage, at least to the Chinese people. Even after the Mongols bypassed it, Ming dynasty continued to spend money on improving the wall. Let's hope Trump doesn't start one along the Mexican border ;)
    2
  10470. Why don't you take look at ongoing prostitution in South Korea for the U.S Military according to Wikipedia, before you celebrate the Rape of Nanjing? (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitutes_in_South_Korea_for_the_U.S._military ) If your own people can't afford to defend your own country and have to stoop to constantly selling yourselves for American protection instead, then what are you people celebrating for? Thanks to PLA being world's largest land army, China can afford to defend ourselves and Japanese soldiers think twice before invading China again today, like they did in the past.
    2
  10471. +인효빈 Blocking access doesn't equal banning using Youtube at all. Where did you learn your basic things? Companies like Google still have buildings and offices in China according to Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_China ) so how is Youtube considered banned in China at all? Many foreign companies in China also make use of Youtube services, so how can Chinese government just banned Youtube altogether?
    2
  10472. 所以说，高句丽是中国东北地区的少数民族政权，并不是朝鲜历史政权。虽然“高句丽”和“高丽”两个虽然都可以叫高丽，但在历史研究中，准确来说应该分别称“高句丽”、与“高丽”。高句丽拥有广袤的中国东北地区和朝鲜半岛北部，高丽则以朝鲜半岛中南部为统治区，二者重合区域极少。可是韩国人自大了就声称高句丽是高丽，所以是自己本国的原始民族。
    2
  10473. Just take good look at Korea today. 1/2 of Korea relies on China for trade, the other 1/2 relies on USA for defense. About 1/3 entire Korean population are starving in North Korea, and about 1/2 of Korea's entire land and resources are locked up in North Korea and inaccessible to South Korea. Anyone can see that Korea is already shadow of its former self.
    2
  10474. Actually, Koreans also eat dog according en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_meat_consumption_in_South_Korea so why insult Chinese only here? China has global brands like Huawei and Lenovo so why you look down Chinese brands?
    2
  10475. Nathan Jones Democracy is not without its flaws. Democracy allows even someone who knows nothing of politics to come to power by playing on people's emotions, like Trump. At least in our system, the candidate has to go through intensive political training to rise into power as the President. We are at least confident that our leader knows our political situation. It's a preconceived notion that democracy is always superior. China chooses a system that suits our needs best.
    2
  10476. +Left Right President Bush's invasion of Iraq was actually illegal according to US Secretary Kofi Ahman. But US membership was not revoked either.
    2
  10477. +Alexander Braatz Chinese government is also doing this because Chinese netizens are complaining about Chinese fishermen, who have been fishing there for ages and suddenly getting arrested by Philippine and Indonesian coastguards.
    2
  10478. Eggsn Bakon The other countries had not been sharing for quite some time. This is matter of sovereignty so why would any country share its borders? Hong Kong and Taiwan were part of China during Qing dynasty and even today they are recognised as part of China.
    2
  10479. China supports 21% of the world population, using only 7% of arable land. There is even enough food to export to other countries.
    2
  10480. Function Motors China has a one-China policy that is recognized by most of the world. unfortunately Korea doesn't.
    2
  10481. China made declaration according to UNCLOS in 2006 not to accept any of the procedures provided for in section 2 of the Convention. Many countries including the United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, France, Canada, and Spain made similar declarations to reject any of the procedures. (Source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippines_v._China#Optional_exceptions_to_applicability_of_compulsory_procedure)
    2
  10482. James Russell If I remembered, When Hawaii voted to join, the voters were mostly American soldiers in Hawaii and their families. Native Hawaiians were not allowed to vote unless they become US citizens. Regarding Imperialism, this is the double standards between the US and China. US is allowed to keep its territories because there was no law back then. China also claimed its islands back then when there was no law, but fast forward to future and it is suddenly illegal to build in its own territories. There were no territorial claims made back then too. Can you see the double standards applied to US and China?
    2
  10483. +theylied1776 The government has imposed sanctions on importing North Korean coal. Some other North Korean materials such as iron, gold, titanium and rare earths were banned. Source: independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/china-announces-sanctions-against-north-korea-a6969256.html Another thing to note is that DPRK is nuclear capable state. You can't just suddenly ban all trade with NK for 6 months just like that. The government is applying sanctions at our own pace and gingerly observing NK's reactions to sanctions for any possible signs of hostility. Are you sure you are political science student?
    2
  10484. rr 22 1. China's economic development is slowing down but there are still room for development. As for becoming a fully developed nation, CPC may one day choose to change its fundamental governing style but so far there doesn't appear to have a need to. CPC will probably push the limits of how far it can govern under the current system. 2. Overhauling the political system doesn't necessarily mean that the corruption will disappear. There are many examples of democratic states still plagued by corruption, so each nation deals with its own corruption differently. 3. Some Chinese think democracy is not suitable for China because of its large 1.3 billion population. The recent US election has left the country deeply divided among rightist and leftist and if such a thing were to happen to China, the country might risk breaking up just like the Soviet Union. A few million votes is already capable of skewing the election so imagine the same thing multiplied by China's population. Those values are important but most Chinese do not feel a low level of personal freedom. Chinese people are free to criticize the government, but the arguments must be well-grounded and preferably directed against people instead of just blaming the whole government.
    2
  10485. Al Qaeda was trained by the CIA and the rise of ISIS can also be attributed to the US.
    2
  10486. China has a greater claim to the South China Sea compared to the US. Why is the US wanting a piece of East Asia's resources for itself when it belongs to East Asians?
    2
  10487. Eric Logan Xi Jinping is working closely with president Duterte of philippine on a peacefully settlement of the south China Sea issue. The US is the only one that seems interested in stirring up trouble in that region.
    2
  10488. Eric Logan N.Korea relies heavily on trade with China. China and Russia both share the same objective in that they are outside of the US sphere of influence and want to remain that way.
    2
  10489. Eric Logan Kim is not dumb enough to bite the hand that feeds it.
    2
  10490. Eric Logan US also absorbed superior Nazi military technology after WW2 so what's wrong with China learning from others countries technology? US space programs were also conducted by ex Nazi rocket scientists.
    2
  10491. +Eric Logan But his efforts were not recognized until after the space program was initiated. I could always say that Chinese invented the rocket historically, but the point is people copy ideas from one another so why blame China only? China produces 70-80% of the worlds products like appliances, smartphones and computers so people like you can afford it and gain access to technology. Why are you so against us?
    2
  10492. Eric Logan Everyone got to begin at one point right? Modern China was built by blood, sweat, tears and sacrifice of Chinese people through invasions, famine, revolutions. China rose from war-torn state to become an economic rival to the US in only a single generation. That is a achievement not many countries can lay claim to. China is slowly branching into technologies like high speed railways. China's railway is the world's largest and Chinese people are even helping the UK to improve on their transportation systems. So why look down on us?
    2
  10493. Leron Benari How? China only wants peace and to do business with US. Which US base did China threaten? US has 100+ military base all over the globe like Guam and Hawaii but complain about China bases that are so close to home. Why compare China to Nazi Germany? China has never invaded another country since 1979 unlike the US even in 21st century. China has big army because a big country with weak army is ripe to invasion as history has shown.
    2
  10494. Eric Logan Genocide is the intention killing of one race over the others, like Hitler against Jews or Japanese against Chinese, Koreans etc. Mao did not intentionally kill our own race Chinese. Nobody knew that the policy would turn out to be a failure. CPC has long acknowledged the failures of Mao and some Chinese support him and some don't. Mao was trying to modernize China so there are some Chinese that appreciate the intentions. Not everyone though. Regardless, CPC does teach Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution in school. If you go to Baidu, you can find information on those events available.
    2
  10495. Eric Logan Trump is already angering Mexican president, one of the US biggest trade partner and plan to tax Mexican goods. Nothing to do with China yet.
    2
  10496. +Lion24 Indeed, USA has anti-missile capabilities, but they have to intercept the missile only during midflight, which means they have to react immediately to any launch in order to successfully defend against it. Furthermore, China won't just fire one missile, we will fire a salvo to saturate the area, since US aircraft carriers would be a priority target during a war. Conquering and occupying islands depends on each navy's own strategies and also some luck. Hawaii may be difficult, but if we occupy Okinawa, we can make it difficult for USA to take that area back by simply installing more troops there. The PLA is one of our greater assets, and it can be used to occupy territory outside of China and make it difficult. for US to try and reclaim those land. US airforce can bomb the islands, but it would take a land invasion ultimately to reclaim those islands. We will have to put our strength to good use in this war.
    2
  10497. China produces good like smartphones, computers, sneakers etc cheaply so that the cost of living in other countries remains low. Think of all the money that millions of people save each day by buying cheaper goods.
    2
  10498. You're correct in that some Chinese words are tied to an idea.For example: 日 -> Sun , 月 -> Moon, 明 -> Tomorrow, (i.e. After one day and one night) 子 > Child, 乃> Woman, 老-> Old man 孕 -> Pregnant (Child in woman), 孝 -> Filial (Old man supported by child) If you include 文-> Culture, then 教-> Teach (Elder teaching Child about Culture) But languages are spoken first and written later. So sometimes similar sounding characters are used to write words. In Mandarin, the Hu people are written as 胡. Lake is also Hu, so it is written as 湖 with a water radical. Butterfly is also Hu, so it is written as 蝴 where 虫 is added to denote insect. And yes, you can read the characters based on what ever spoken form you choose and that's why Japanese are able to use Kanji. For example 子 -> Zi in Mandarin, Zai in Cantonese, and Ko in Japanese. 女 -> Nu in Mandarin, Neuih in Cantonese, and On'na / Jo in Japanese. 文-> Wen in Mandarin, Mahn in Cantonese, and Bun in Japanese. A picture has no sound associated with it and can be pronounced differently by different cultures. That's the beauty of Kanji and Chinese characters; They're just pictures which you can attach a sound to.
    2
  10499. I feel that communism and democracy are merely methods of governance. Democracy is the better one undoubtedly, but the CCP is more capitalist and socialist now and it has pulled China from famine and poverty up to an economic powerhouse and a potential superpower. Its not perfect, but is it really as bad as the Western media makes it out to be? One thing's for sure, Chinese's government looks out for the best interests of China without US intervention. They see the world through a lens untainted by Western ideas. If the whole world was democratic, then the whole world would be ruled by the US. Just look at UN and NATO being polarized by the US.
    2
  10500. +Shirghazay Cowboys Thank you for your kind words. China has worked hard to pull itself up from poverty into economical power.
    2
  10501. King Bensley I agree with you too. I only contribute to the discussion as a hypothetical scenario. War is bloodshed, rape, lost of lives and disruption to livelihood. War should only be a last resort and should never be glorified.
    2
  10502. +I don't like Herodotus Philippines is strategic base for the US forces in South China Sea. As long as Duterte deny the US presence in Philippines, it is already being a good ally of China for peace in the region.
    2
  10503. Why you use the word Jurchens instead of Manchus? It was Manchu people that conquered China during Qing dynasty. Much of Manchu culture been assimilated into Chinese culture and they are no longer distinct. Today, Manchu people are a recognized minority group within China. When Mongols conquered China, they made Inner Mongolia part of Yuan dynasty China. Outer Mongolia still exists as Mongolia, but Inner Mongolia has been made autonomous region of China. All these historical events are recorded according to Chinese texts, both by Mongol and Manchu rulers of China.
    2
  10504. PrankFrank I don't understand what deranged logic you using to back up your claims. 1. China is Korea's main export partner, and exports to China make up 25% of S. Korea economy. (Source: Wikipedia: Economy of South Korea) 2. Chinese tourists make up the majority of tourism in S. Korea, followed by Japanese tourists (Source: Wikipedia: Tourism in South Korea) 3. You work in ATI, not in Huawei or Xiaomi, so you don't know that for sure. Lastly, I am not so low to resort to name calling if your beliefs are different from mine. All you people seem to do is call Chinese delusional, or insult people's mothers is all.
    2
  10505. +Vitamin C According to Apple statistics, Chinese workers get paid only 10 cents out of every dollar that Apple makes. But China slowly became rich from billions of 10 cents being earned to get to where we are today. Why you look down on Chinese workers making those products? Its not as glamorous as German or Japanese products, but its still honest living nevertheless. China was once dirt poor country, but rose up because of Chinese workers efforts. Why you continue humiliate and despise Chinese workers? Do you know what's its like to eat dirt to live once, wherever you are from?
    2
  10506. And people like you contribute nothing...... except insults is all.
    2
  10507. Golfgang Motzy Mozart If you not contributing to discussion, then why comment and insult Chinese people at all?
    2
  10508. Golfgang Motzy Mozart It's true what I said. You contribute absolutely nothing to the discussion but derogatory remarks about Chinese people and laugh about it.
    2
  10509. Chinese government helped to buy off part of US debt in order help them tide through 2008 financial crisis. Recovery from the crash sped up, due to USA and Chinese efforts. Why continue make derogatory remarks against Chinese people?
    2
  10510. You can choose not to buy products from Chinese companies, but in the end, most Korean, Japanese, etc products are still manufactured in China. Many countries always threatened to boycott Chinese products entirely, but in the end, there is still demand for affordable Chinese goods. Look at President Trump when he threatened trade war with China during his campaign and calling us currency manipulators. After meeting with President Xi, he appear to retract his statements and did not label our government currency manipulator. If RMB value goes up, then Chinese workers wages goes up, then prices of Chinese goods become more expensive and inflation in USA and other countries will go up as well.
    2
  10511. +JuanYang7 According to historical records, Goguryeo kingdom territory encompasses of parts of modern day Northeastern China and North Korea, not South Korea. South Korea was made up of Baekje and Silla, kingdoms that opposed Goguryeo. So where is the link that Goguryeo is South Korea at all? Just look at this map of Goguryeo: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/empires/empires/goguryeo/empiremap.jpg
    2
  10512. +SwellewS South Koreans believes that their country descended from Goguryeo, even when Goguryeo lasted until 668 AD and disappeared, and then, Goryeo appeared in 918 AD. How is that not evidence that Koreans are faking history? The map of Goguryeo consists of mainly Northeastern China territories and North Korea, rather than South Korea according (freeenglishsite.com/empires/empires/goguryeo/empiremap.jpg )
    2
  10513. +Ridgway During the 19th and 20th centuries, the Japanese Empire differentiated Goguryeo from the other Three Kingdoms of Korea to claim Japanese (Wa) influence in the non-Goguryeo kingdoms of Baekje and Silla in order to justify its colonization of Korea. So how can you claim everybody in this world claims Goguryeo is Korean Kingdom? You don't even do research before spouting nonsense. You mean Korea can just claim Goguryeo simply because its name is derived from it, as the sole basis of its claim?
    2
  10514. +Ridgway You don't even have evidence of Japanese what textbooks say, so how can you claim to know what they say? You been repeating the same old point again and again, but there is no physical evidence of Goguryeo ruins being located in South Korea or anything, so how can you substantiate S. Korea's claim? Just because Korea's name is derived from Goryeo? Goryeo and Goguryeo are two separate countries existing in different points in history.
    2
  10515. +Ridgway You think just because you teach Japanese means you are correct? Japanese textbooks also denied the Rape of Nanjing and Unit 731 and "comfort" women according to (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_history_textbook_controversies ) so exactly what do you know about Japanese version of history? You think Koreans aren't angry at Japanese denial of "comfort" women? There is even a statue of a Korean comfort women erected at Japanese embassy, so what do you know of the relations between China, Korea and Japan at all?
    2
  10516. +Ridgway You have been repeating the same old point again and again, even when it has long proven to be wrong. You don't even have any evidence of Japanese textbooks to support your claim at all, whereas I have shown the location of Goguryeo ruins to be in China and North Korea, not South Korea. The only evidence you have is the name itself, which does not prove anything. Looking at maps of Goguryeo clearly shows that majority of it lies in Northeast China and North Korea, which is why the ruins are located there. What about books and records of Goguryeo? China has 500 books about Goguryeo, even so much that Korean scholars need to refer to Chinese archives for information about Goguryeo. What makes it Korean if they don't even have information at all about Goguryeo? You are the one keep claiming Goguryeo is South Korean when you don't have any physical archaeological evidence, or records of Goguryeo and so on. All you have is a name that's all.
    2
  10517. +Ridgeway Japanese student will also say Nanjing Massacre didn't happen, and Korean comfort women were well-paid prostitutes. Exactly what do you know about Asian relations to each other at all? You keep claiming Goguryeo is Korean kingdom, but where is your proof? No archaelogical evidence. No historical records of Goguryeo. Even Goguryeo Map shows it located mainly in Northeast China. The only "evidence" you shown is Korea's name that's all, so how is that proof to claim an entire kingdom as being Korean? I am still waiting for your so-called evidence that Goguryeo is Korean kingdom at all. All you done is repeat the same French-Waterloo scenario, so many times, when it has nothing to do with Asia.
    2
  10518. +솜사탕맛쿠키 三國史記 was taken from Chinese records of Goguryeo, Sillia and Baekje, so how is that proof? Your Korean scholars had to refer to Chinese archives for information about Goguryeo, because Korea didn't even existed back then. China has had over 500 books about Goguryeo so why you said all books were burnt? And look at the language all written using Chinese characters in the first place, yet you claim Goguyeo language was simillar as Bakjae and Sillia? How is this even proof at all? +Ridgway You have been repeating the same old point again and again even when proven wrong. Are their any archaeological evidence of Goguryeo ruins in South Korea at all? What about the map of Goguryeo where it was part of Northeastern China and North Korea? All these evidence been staring you in the eye, yet you conveniently choose ignore it and claim it is Korean Kingdom base on the name itself? You don't even cite any actual physical evidence, so how do you expect people believe your claim at all?
    2
  10519. +Turkey Wine Don't blame China for taking jobs. Its the big MNCs that choose to the country with cheapest labor for setting up factories. Other countries with cheaper labor, such as India or Vietnam, are also going to compete for jobs. In short, China may give up the jobs, but the jobs may go to India or Vietnam instead of back to the US. Depends on the MNCs.
    2
  10520. Turkey Wine Indeed. Chinese people are also usually against child labour but according to Confucius, supporting parents is part of filial piety so that's why the government does not enforce it strictly. Forced labour is always illegal in Chinese law.
    2
  10521. Ima SuperPerson China doesn't need US approval to do whatever it wants. It built those bases as it saw fit to. So far, China treated the US like trading partner, but if US treat China like enemy then don't be surprise if we treat US same way.
    2
  10522. Leron Benari Yes, now China has powerful weapons but choose not to invade other countries. Investment is more important than invasion.
    2
  10523. 很多外国人以为清朝就是中国，没读过中国的历史。
    2
  10524.  @Weaver_Games  Why mock our writing system as s**t just because it is ancient? Chinese characters constitute the oldest "continuously" used system of writing in the world, having been used since 1200 BCE so why abandon our ancient system just because you don't like it? Source: Chinese characters wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_characters
    2
  10525.  @PhysicsGamer  "神州 Shenzhou ...Not liking a thing is a perfectly sufficient reason to not want to do a thing" But it's the laws of the language, I mean, why don't you write English sentences backwards? Or mess up the alphabets in a word then? Then Chinese characters requires that you follow the proper stroke order as part of learning Chinese.
    2
  10526.  @showalk  Did I ever said anything about the ability to understand the character that's being written? I'm talking about the proper way to write Chinese characters (just like a proper way to write English words) but what has that even got to do with the bearing to understand the character? You can show a non-English speaker a word that they're unfamiliar with and no matter what method you employ to write it, they still won't understand it.
    2
  10527.  @PhysicsGamer  I'm talking about writing the alphabets of the words from a different order instead of left to right. Take your name PhysicsGamer for example, do you write r-e-m-a-G-s-c-i-y-h-P (which is basically writing PhysicsGamer from right to left) when you spell your name? Or do you perhaps start in the middle, writing G-a-m-e-r first before writing P-h-y-s-i-c-s? No, you write it the proper way, from left to right, P-h-y-s-i-c-s-G-a-m-e-r because that's the way words are written in English. Likewise, Chinese characters have their own proper stroke order. I'm not talking about how each letter is written, I'm talking about how each word is written. Do starting writing words from right to left, or begin somewhere in the middle? No, just like there is a proper way to write Chinese characters according to stroke order. How is "only one standardized font' choice in Chinese characters, kind of silly? I thought we are talking about stroke order. Besides, all other Chinese fonts follow the same stroke order as taught in the language, do you know of any fonts that follow a different stroke order as the one prescribed? So because English cursive has fallen into disuse, means that it isn't taught in English classes? Just like Chinese calligraphy, there's a proper stroke order to Chinese calligraphy and learning the proper stroke order is fundamental to learning Chinese characters. Have you seen videos in which elderly men in China practice Chinese calligraphy using floor tiles as the backdrop?
    2
  10528.  @PhysicsGamer  "Here's an alternative: stop caring about stroke order, and instead care directly about whether the shape of the character is recognizable." But what if the character is unrecognisable, simply because the student did not learn the proper stroke order? Are you even a student of Chinese language yourself in the first place?
    2
  10529.  @PhysicsGamer  Yes English letters are read left to write. But we are talking about stroke order so how do you write English words? Left to right, not right to left or starting in the middle (see the different ways I used to write PhysicsGamer for example) so why is following the correct stroke order in Chinese characters so difficult? That's just the way Chinese characters are written that's all. "And again, plenty of English words are commonly written ending in the middle - such as, for instance, "middle" itself." How is the word "middle" written such that it ends in the middle? As for the your second paragraph, stroke orders are the way Chinese characters are written, who said anything about neon signs? Handwritten Chinese Signboards follow the traditional strokes of Chinese calligraphy, of course printed signs don't follow stroke order (just like printed English words don't follow any sort of stroke order) but like I said, we are talking about how the Chinese characters are written. I mean, if you don't have a neon sign or printer handy (or even a cell phone) then given a pen and paper, how would you write Chinese characters if you don't know the proper stroke order? Regarding your digital fonts, how would you go about writing those Chinese characters onto a piece of paper? You need to learn proper stroke order else like I said earlier, a 台 might end up looking like a 合 which are 2 different characters. Stroke orders help minimise the amount of errors created while writing characters, of course when you digitalise everything then it becomes redundant. But Chinese characters are traditionally written down, not digitalised until the digital age. About English cursive writing, the so-called "stroke order" is even more apparent, because each letter is properly connected to the letter before it, so it becomes even more important to know the proper "stroke order" About cursive English disappearing, this is untrue and cursive English is still taught in the United Kingdom for example. It's the Americans that aren't interested preserving this tradition that's all.
    2
  10530.  @PhysicsGamer  Who's talking about the individual letters? I'm talking about writing the word PhysicsGamer itself not about how each letter is written. Do you write the P then u then a then e then G then a then s... in some random order? No, you write it from left to right, starting with P and ending with r. You don't start in the middle of PhysicsGamer you start with P and end with r so likewise, there is a correct stroke order for Chinese characters. Why compare writing Chinese characters to letters, when our characters are infinitely more complex to letters? It should be a comparison of Chinese characters to words itself. Like I said, even if neon lights and printed words don't have a stroke order, then how do you write Chinese characters if you yourself don't even know the proper stroke order? Even English printed signs and neon signs don't have a stroke order, but written English has a sort of way to write of its own. Without a proper stroke order, how are you going to write Chinese characters on paper and still be understood? And in your picture, the 合 is passable but what on earth is that character on the left? Is it a Korean character? Is it supposed to be a 台? Because you clearly don't know the proper stroke order or how the character is supposed to look like, then how will you be understood if you wrote it like that? You show that character to a Chinese teacher and he/she will ask you to write that character at least 50 times more. Because that's how Chinese characters are learnt. Cursive English is still taught in the United Kingdom, the practice of teaching primary school-aged children the art of cursive (often called 'joined-up') handwriting has been a standard part of the UK's curriculum for decades. And if English language users decide not to pass on their language history, that does not mean that China should forget our stroke orders. Is it necessary to learn the stroke order of Chinese characters? hackingchinese.com/is-it-necessary-to-learn-the-stroke-order-of-chinese-characters/ Short answer: Yes.
    2
  10531.  @blacklistnr1  There isn't really a time limit for discussion, whether the post is 3 years ago or 3 minutes ago, as long as people reply. Yes, nowadays we have keyboards and whatnot to type out words in English. But how do you type out Chinese characters? There are mainly 2 ways to type Chinese characters; phonetic readings or root shapes. Methods under the phonetic category usually are easier to learn but are less efficient, thus resulting in slower typing speeds because they typically require users to choose from a list of phonetically similar characters for input; whereas methods under the root shape category allow very precise and speedy input but have a difficult learning curve because they often require a thorough understanding of a character's strokes and composition. Source: Chinese input methods for computers wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_input_methods_for_computers Other methods allow users to write characters directly onto touchscreens, such as those found on mobile phones and tablet computers. So it seems as though Chinese stroke order is going to remain relevant in today's digital age, because Chinese root shape input methods require the proper stroke order in order for programs to recognise characters and imprint the correct characters. Most Chinese users use a combination of the two methods described above.
    2
  10532.  @PhysicsGamer  But you clearly start with "P" first isn't it? That's the "stroke order" of English, you don't start with some other letter, so that's why there's a stroke order in Chinese characters too. As for the world "middle" you begin with "m" so how do you begin in the middle? You don't start with one of the "d"s don't you? You start with "m" because it's the proper way to write. How does your point stand when I can't even understand what the character on the left of your picture is? I can recognise the 合 but what on earth is that character to the left of it? Is it a Korean Hangul character? Because it looks nothing like 台 and of you don't believe me, show the picture to other Chinese and see if they can recognise what the character on the left is. It's because you don't know the proper stroke order that's why your character turned out like that. You're just illustrating the need to learn the correct stroke order in Chinese. And of course you'll refuse to write that character 50 times more, because you're clearly not a student of Chinese language and you have no interest in learning Chinese, then why mock Chinese stroke order when you messed up the character? No self-respecting Chinese teacher would tolerate such a student without correction, and the same could be said for an English teacher who's student messed up his/her word. Cursive English is even taught by countries learning English. Like in China, people learn cursive English as part of our English language program and Hong Kong SAR Source: Why digital natives must still learn handwriting: so they can pass Hong Kong exams (and write birthday cards) amp.scmp.com/lifestyle/families/article/2085005/why-digital-natives-must-still-learn-handwriting-so-they-can-pass And even in the digital age with keyboards and whatnot, how do you type out Chinese characters? There are 2 ways, phonetic readings or root shapes. Methods under the phonetic category usually are easier to learn but are less efficient, thus resulting in slower typing speeds because they typically require users to choose from a list of phonetically similar characters for input; whereas methods under the root shape category allow very precise and speedy input but have a difficult learning curve because they often require a thorough understanding of a character's strokes and composition. Other methods allow users to write characters directly onto touchscreens, such as those found on mobile phones and tablet computers. Source: Chinese input methods for computers wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_input_methods_for_computers So even in this digital age, correct stroke order is important for Chinese character recognition software to be able to understand what you're writing. Most users use a combination of the two methods.
    2
  10533.  @PhysicsGamer  Why does my comparison to writing letters from left to right in English to stroke order when writing Chinese characters not make sense? I never said anything about reading a word from left to write, in English, people literally just recognise the word itself (PhysicsGamer for example) just like Chinese characters (my username 神州 for example). But how do you write the English word and Chinese characters? You use the proper method for English words (left to right) as well as for Chinese characters (stroke order). That's the way words and characters are written. Your character on the left doesn't even resemble any known Chinese characters, it looks like Korean Hangul (님? ) or some other language. Because you didn’t even learn the proper Chinese stroke order, so aren't you clearly proving my point that stroke order is important? Because if not, then your character doesn't even look like a Chinese character 台 at all. How is learning cursive a complete waste of time? It generally improves writing speed, allows kids to better string words together and improves spelling. You talk about print, but what if you don't have a keyboard nearby? Using print makes you lazy, you might start typing "r u alrite?" instead of "Are you alright?". And even if you use print, cursive writing has shown to improve a child's spelling, you know how many i's and s's there are in Mississippi for example if you practice cursive. Where does my SCMP article claim that "cursive is faster than print"? Please quote where in the article does it even makes such a claim. And do you know what are phonemes? It's dividing words into pieces Like Phy sics Gam er in order to improve memorization and internalised "pronouncing" of the word as you write it out. And you're writing a simple character 台 using OCR input. What happens when you have to write more complex Chinese characters like the 神 character in my username for example? Try writing 神 without knowing the proper stroke order. And we haven't even touched on more complicated characters in the Chinese language. Stroke order serves as a "road map" on how to write the more difficult Chinese characters so even in the digital age, stroke order is going to play an important role to students of the Chinese language.
    2
  10534.  @PhysicsGamer  So English words are written in a specific order from left to right and Chinese characters have proper stroke order. You claim that it's a matter of convenience for English then it's also a matter of convenience for Chinese characters to follow the proper stroke order isn't it? How does it undermine my argument? How do I know if you're writing in Chinese? Your left character beside 合 looks nothing like a character in the Chinese language, it looks like Korean Hangul or something else. Because you clearly did not follow the proper stroke order, and that's why your 台 character turned out to be unrecognisable. Did you shoe that picture to Chinese and see if they recognise that character? Hey, you said my SCMP article contained inaccuracies, but where in my SCMP article did it ever said that "cursive is faster than print"? You quoted: "Studies show that joining letters not only helps to increase the speed at which children work but crucially aids their mental processing skills, helping them think more fluently." but where in this quote does it say that "cursive is faster than print"? I mean, earlier you specifically said (and I quote): "The SCMP article you quoted is riddled with inaccuracies. Contrary to what it claims, cursive is slower than print, not faster, and cursive has nothing to do with writing phonemes rather than letters" but where in my SCMP article does it ever made the claim that "cursive is faster than print"? And how doesn't phonemes have nothing to do with cursive writing? When you use cursive writing, you are subconsciously forming phonemes as you write out each word. Your 神 character is passable, but because you said you "never encountered the character 神 before" then you are deliberately left stumbling in the dark, without a road map that is Chinese stroke order. I can already tell that your 礻radical is following the incorrect stroke order, resulting in a strange "curve" when it should be sharp. That's the problem without learning the proper stroke order. Even writing the 申 you deliberately tried to draw a square 口 but because you use a single continuous stroke, you could have mistaken drawn a circle O (when writing quickly) instead of a square 口. That's the danger of abandoning the stroke order. And just so you know, the proper stroke order for 神 can be found here: Source: Stroke order for 神 strokeorder.info/mandarin.php?q=%E7%A5%9E And 神 isn't even considered a complex character yet you're having difficulty writing it without knowing the stroke order. Could you imagine writing some of the more complicated Chinese characters? Like say, the character 藏 (hiding)? Without the stroke order acting as a guide map? Whether you want to consider English 1 dimensional and Chinese 2 dimensional has little bearing on the learning the stroke order.
    2
  10535.  @PhysicsGamer  I said that English write from left to right as a matter of convenience, then Chinese follow the stroke order as a matter of convenience too. Following the correct stroke order IS the convenience, just like writing from left to right in English. Why is my question "How do I know if you're writing in Chinese?" asinine? What's the context? You could just started writing that character on the left of 合 randomly out of nowhere to a Chinese stranger on the street and since your character does not resemble any known Chinese character (it looks like Korean Hangul or some other language) then how would people know if you're writing Chinese? When you didn't bother to learn the proper stroke order in the first place? Your character could be confused with some other language like the Korean Hangul, say 님 for example. All because you didn't bother to learn the proper stroke order. Where in my SCMP article did it ever mentioned "print" at all? Your quote "This is very misguided, as the sheer amount of note taking and work demands in secondary school require the speed of cursive more than ever." so what it says is that that the speed of cursive is "required" but not that "cursive is faster than print" like you are proclaiming. Where in this quote does it say that "cursive is faster than print"? You said: "One also groups phonemes when one writes in print. That is not unique to cursive." There, you have just proven your earlier statement ("cursive has nothing to do with writing phonemes rather than letters.") wrong, since cursive groups phonemes like in print. Thank you for proving your earlier statement wrong. You said: "Despite having never seen the character 神 before, you were able to tell what I had written." That's incorrect, I have seen the character 神 before (it's part of my username for crying out loud) And by talking to me, you have already seen the character 神 in my username, if not my profile picture, so why did you claim you never seen the character 神 before? How to define "expand less effort"? The number of strokes alone doesn't determine the amount of effort spent. For example, in your writing of the the 礻radical, you had to curve your 2nd stroke awkwardly downwards, instead of naturally to the left, had you followed the proper stroke order. And you had to do an awkward stroke on the left (to make it seem as though it's joined) so it's possible that you expanded more effort than had you follow the proper stroke order. And about drawing a circle O instead of a square 口 for the 申, where did your hand (or pen or brush) position ended up after completing that circle? If you were writing this character on a piece of paper on the wall (or phone held vertically), you would be drawing upwards (going against gravity) if you didn't follow the proper stroke order. The proper stroke order optimises the position of the hand (or brush or pen or stylus, whatever) after each stroke, allowing you to save effort with each stroke. So you can't just determine that you "expanded less effort" just from the number of strokes alone. Additionally, a following the proper stroke order helps in memorization of the character itself. If you follow a random stroke order each time you write 神 then your brain will have a harder time memorizing different pathways to write the character, had you not followed the proper stroke order. Learning the proper stroke order helps you to write other characters as well. Once you know how to write 礻radical then it becomes easier to write 禅, 祖, 礼 and other characters with 礻radical. Just like 申 for other characters. I didn't really ask you to write 藏 character in my previous comment, I merely said: "Could you imagine writing some of the more complicated Chinese characters? Like say, the character 藏 (hiding)? Without the stroke order acting as a guide map?" but since you did it anyway, isn't it difficult to do so without first learning the proper stroke order? Of course Chinese characters can be subdivided down into character components. Like what I did with 礻+申 = 神. But did you know that even each subdivided component has their own stroke order? Here's the stroke order for 礻. Source: Stroke order for 礻wiktionary.org/wiki/%E7%A4%BB#Translingual
    2
  10536.  @blacklistnr1  For all my talk about stroke orders, they aren't entirely set in stone. The Chinese language is evolving, some people may find better stroke orders that are better to traditional stroke orders, and there are always exceptions to writing certain characters a certain way. About the Oxis Chinese Character Finder, most Chinese speakers have our own methods to printing characters using one of the two above described methods: phonetic or root shape, and most are comfortable using a mix of the two. This novel Chinese character finder seems more suitable for adults who are learning Chinese (but aren't familiar with Pinyin or how to write radicals) so searching for graphics may be appealing to them.
    2
  10537. Japan, South Korea and Taiwan all have issues with each other that is historical and difficult to describe. They are also big trading partners with China so it they may choose to remain neutral until the war is over and trade with the victor.
    2
  10538. US forces in Vietnam withdraw after taking some minor losses during Vietnam war. Chinese forces took heavy losses in Korean war against US, UK, Canada, Australia etc. but held on long enough for it to become a stalemate.
    2
  10539. Mewmewmew:3 After WW2, Korea was divided into North (controlled by Soviets) and South (controlled by US). N. Korea tried to unify Korea but was prevented by the US intervention. China's only intervene because it was allies with N. Korea and US was approaching its doorstep. N. Korea collapsing would result in mass refugees for S. Korea and China. China seeks an alternative to the collapse of N. Korea. China sends mainly food to N. Korea. N. Korea was nuclearized by Soviets. China seeks to promote denuclearization of N. Korea.
    2
  10540. Alright funnycnn. Mewmewmew, you have no proof of those accusations. China has repeatedly stated its stance with regards to N. Korea nuclearization. China has denied sending nukes to N. Korea. China's bilateral relations with N. Korea are dealt with separately from the UN relations.
    2
  10541. +Willie Daniels Many sources agree that the Chinese civil war began even before WW2, when Jiang Jieshi (Chiang Kai Shek) ordered the purging of thousands of communists in Shanghai. USA did not directly support Jiang but send him military aid. However, Jiang and his party were corrupt, pocketing $750 million of USA aid, even president Truman remarked on it.
    2
  10542. 说得好。以前中国被苏联和美国利用。现在我们长大了，就可以用自己的国力统一国家。不管是台湾还是香港人，只要相信我们全部是华人。同胞加油～😄！
    2
  10543. Chinese people don't really differentiate between government and business, whether state-owned or not. If both parties are agreeable, then there will be quick approval. Better still if there is political benefit as well. Any delay only acts as the barriers to trade is all.
    2
  10544. +Shawn 12 As far as I know, ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs are also partially logographic. And if you want, you could even consider Sign language to be based on meanings entirely (since there is no "sounds") =X
    2
  10545. I heard that the Filipino President Duterte recently decided to break it off with the US after so many years as US ally and instead, team up with China instead. At this rate, hopefully the South China Seas conflict would be resolved peacefully.
    2
  10546. John Dickson But the US has military bases in S.Korea, Japan and the Philippines and for what reason? S.Korea's army is strong enough to handle N.Korea and wants the US to take steps to vacate the country. But the US has refused to leave so far. US troops in Okinawa keep raping the locals but the Japanese government keeps quiet about it. Japan's army is smallest in East Asia and it cannot rebuild because of WW2 treaty. Even Germany has long rebuilt its army after WW2 and Japan is still "castrated" after 70 over years. How is it they are considered free? Philippine President Duterte wants an end to the Philippines' joint military exercises with the United States, saying the next war games will be the last under his term. And we seen what the US has done to the Middle east countries. Afghanistan, Iraq, etc... did not emerge any better after the US invaded them. We hope the US don't do the same thing to growing Asia.
    2
  10547. +coolwitme1 Lets take a look at the individual goals of each East Asian countries and try to understand them. S.Korea's ultimate goal is possibly the unification of Korea. Even if it doesn't want to claim N.Korea, if N.Korea invades than S.Korea is effectively tied up for the rest of the war. Resisting N.Korea probably takes precedence over coming to the aid of other allies. Taiwan's ultimate goal is to either reclaim China or claim independence from China. It can be persuaded to defend its allies or it could try to invade China and try to destroy the CCP from within. If it chose to invade China then the defending force is split in two because it chose to invade China. China has possibly enough troops to fight a war on two fronts if the forces are not coordinated enough although its still a disadvantage. Lastly, Japan goal is probably to simply defend itself. It would probably try to restrict its limited army to defend Japan only instead of aiding its allies. Sending them away to fight the Chinese only leaves the main island vulnerable to retaliation. These views are overly-simplified but are still possible scenarios that a Chinese general can exploit. The US could persuade them to work together but it must first know the intricacies of each nation. My example with Russia was to show that the US has to approach the situation very delicately. US would also be under great pressure to aid its allies if war breaks out in East Asia. I too, think that China is unlikely to start a war but that doesn't mean we can't hypothesize what's going to happen.
    2
  10548. coolwitme1 Kieran Jo​ You guys are shallow and naive -_- My analysis may be simple but it's much more realistic than your "let's all join hands together" scenario. You folks don't see anything beyond the surface. N.Korea doesn't need to invade the South. It just needs to apply pressure by building a large force near the border. S. Korea will be forced to allocate forces to protect its border and this will lock up valuable assets and reduce the amount of aid to give to allies. China and Taiwan hate each other but both agree that they are Chinese. If Taiwan declares independence, they relinquish the right to 4000 years of Chinese history and China has the "excuse" to quell a rebellious state. US currently recognises 1 China policy so helping Taiwan will violate the treaty. That means US is the violator not China. Do you know how hard it is for a single carrier to cross the Pacific alone? You have to include escorts or else a sneaky submarine will make short work of a lone carrier. And you say you want to send 5 carriers over? You guys know nuts about politics and warfare. The Art of War says "know yourself, know your enemies" but you don't know anything. Let's hope the new US president is not so arrogant and ignorant as you two.
    2
  10549. +coolwithme1 How is that? What sort of analysis have you done? Have you looked at what S.Korea wants or what Japan or Taiwan wants? Japan and S.Korea will be safe as long as they observe the 1 China policy if China invades Taiwan. They look out for long term interests not short term like you. You think all countries are like the US? Always on the lookout for war? They are the ones living here in Asia and they stand to lose the most out of joining the war. US stands to gain the most here. After the war, East Asia will be in ruins and the US can return home to celebrate. Sorry, you are not only shallow and naive. You also clearly lack the ability to empathize with other people and to see the world through their eyes.
    2
  10550. Kieran Jo Hey, being realistic is better than just declaring "All of us will all definitely go to war". Look at the historical wars, One side is aggressive, another is defensive, another remains neutral, another doesn't join in until much much later. You have to see each nations motives for joining the war and at what time should a nation join the war for maximum benefit. You think countries just commit to a war on a whim and hope for the best? Like I said you guys know nothing of politics. You group everyone into "Us versus Them" scenarios and just leave it at that. I really pray that Trump has more fore-sight than you although I seriously doubt it.
    2
  10551. Rahuley Shar Most of China's military technology came from Russia. The Chinese aircraft carrier Liao Ning is actually based off an old Russian aircraft carrier.
    2
  10552. hiroanz Taiwan is an important ally for the US but is it worth fighting another world war over it? Russia invaded Ukraine and annexed Crimea and the US did nothing but impose sanctions. Now Trump seems to want to lift those sanctions so does it mean the US approve of the invasion? According to one-China policy, China can legally invade Taiwan but not Japan, S.Korea because they are sovereign states. Guam is also US territory so why would China invade a US base and declare war with the US?
    2
  10553. +EastCoastMusic 79 China is only using its power to defend its sovereignty, not invading other countries.
    2
  10554. China has been invaded many times in history so it has learnt harsh lesson and is well-prepared this time.
    2
  10555. +Aaron Hoppitt How? Trade between China and US have been beneficial for both sides over the last decades. China has been helping US with its debt during the financial crisis. Chinese products helps lower the cost of living in US, with products like appliances, smartphones, computers and other gadgets.
    2
  10556. People who think Chinese people are controlled by the government, should really start asking Chinese people exactly how much "control" the government has over them.
    2
  10557. +justice and vengence So, you are saying that free speech and freedom of expression can only be observed by someone else outside the system? How then, do you actually know you are free? Are you outside the system?
    2
  10558. +justice and vengence Alrght then. Since I am also talking to you right now, that means that I too should be free right?
    2
  10559. Skyried These new generation of Chinese are English educated and most have been overseas. They know the political systems of both their homeland and other countries. Surely they are entitled to their own opinions. Most acknowledged that Chinese government is no perfect, but neither is it completely unviable. There's nothing wrong with not having an opinion. Ordinary people may choose not to discuss politics if they want to, right? That's why democracy sometimes have eligible voters who choose not to vote. It depends on the individual.
    2
  10560.  @venkatramakkineni  "Truly evolved scripts provide speaker the ability to come up with a series of characters and the order they should be arranged in to represent the word in writing merely by listening to the word. That is the function of a script. English provides this ability to some extent as I'm sure you'll agree. But English does not eliminate the need to memorize words." Chinese characters provide this ability to some extent too, it's a living language after all and it's are constantly evolving with the times, (whereas other ancient scripts like Sumerian Cuneiform, Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered dead languages today). For example, modern Chinese call our fathers ba 爸 which a new character. Ancient Chinese called their fathers fu 父 and the modern character for father is derived from adding a sound 巴 (ba) below 父 to get the character ba 爸. So anyone seeing the character 爸 at least knows that it's related to father from the 父 part. Who knows, in the far future, we might start calling our fathers differently. But you can rest assured that the 父 character for father will remain relevant. As for my second paragraph, you didn't really answer my question of "So how would you define "practicality" then?" What's your criteria for "practicality" then? Is the script having been used since 1200 BCE? Is it the fact that Mandarin Chinese is the most spoken language by number of speakers today? Here's a list of the Top Ten Most Spoken Languages according to the following source: The Top 10 Most Spoken Languages in the World 1. Mandarin Chinese (1.1 billion speakers) 2. English (983 million speakers) 3. Hindustani (544 million speakers) 4. Spanish (527 million speakers) 5. Arabic (422 million speakers) 6. Malay (281 million speakers) 7. Russian (267 million speakers) 8. Bengali (261 million speakers) 9. Portuguese (229 million speakers) 10. French (229 million speakers) Source: What are the Most Spoken Languages in the World? fluentin3months.com/most-spoken-languages/ You said: "I hope you'll agree that coming up with more characters for words with each passing century doesn't count toward evolution." But how do you define evolution (of script or language) if adding new words to vocabulary doesn't count? What makes a language or script truly "alive and evolving" not "stagnant and dead" then? The problem is you refuse to define terms like "practicality" or "evolution" that's all.
    2
  10561.  @venkatramakkineni  How did I confuse written language with spoken language? Every spoken word has a written form like what I've shown with the character ba 爸 for father in modern Chinese. I mean, show the words "father and dad" to English kids and they may not know that they have the same meaning. But show the same words in Chinese (i.e 父 and 爸) to Chinese kids and once they know 父 is father then they'll know that 爸 is related to 父. Because they use the same radical after all. Let's compare the characters/words for trees, woods, and forest in English and Chinese. In Chinese they would be 木(tree), 林(woods), 森(big forest) and they are all basically repetitions of 木 that all. If you show a kid the words tree, woods and forest how likely are they going to get those words correct, compared to showing a kid 木, 林 and 森? I'll bet even English kids can guess the meanings of 木, 林 and 森. -About Education in China, children go to grade 1 at the age of 7 and when they graduated from the primary school (grade 6), they should know at least 2500 characters, and the target made by the China Ministry of Education. -Generally speaking, adults often have a harder time learning a new language different from their first language, compared to kids. Adult aren't as absorbant as children when it comes to learning new languages, that's why many non-English speaking adults have a difficult time learning English while as adults. Same goes for Chinese or Japanese or French or any language different from the one they were brought up with as a child. I disagree with the view that "each character should make a unique sound." Theres only a limited number sounds that human vocal cords can make (as impressive as our vocal cords may be) and it becomes tedious to make up new sounds for every single new word, and as long as you can differentiate similar sounding characters using context, then can't sounds repeat themselves? After all, it's more efficient to reuse the same sounds, rather than program new sounds all the time. "character set should remove the need to memorize spellings" Not sure how I feel about this criteria, but without spellings, words can easily be misspelt and written incorrectly. What Chinese does is that it simplifies the character. For example, the simplified version of 龍 for dragon is 龙 and this reduces the number of so-called spelling errors. But I don't think anyone can completely remove the need for spelling, you literally have to write nothing at all. About the decimal system, even kids counting from 1 to 20 in English may find it difficult. Once they count beyond 10 (ten) the next number 11 is (eleven) and 12 (twelve) comes next followed by 13 (thirteen) 14 (fourteen) etc and the pattern develops. So there's this strange "aberration" of eleven and twelve in the English numerical system. Whereas in Chinese mathematics, after 10 (十) comes 11 (十一) and 12 (十二) which are basically 10+1 and 10+2 respectively and the child has an easier time picking up the mathematical pattern. Hopefully this video better illustrates this example. Video: How The Chinese Language Makes Math Easier - Linguistic Analysis youtu.be/n7jHT7Tumcw
    2
  10562. Yes, 女 is pronounced Nu (Mandarin), Neuh (Cantonese), Neng (Teochew) and On'na (Japanese). But in all cases it still means "women".
    2
  10563. I agree. China and US relations very important for international cooperation. Focusing on domestic issues is just as important.
    2
  10564. +XIAXIA XU I agree that the problem in N.K was initially started by the West. Korea was unified during Joseon dynasty, but after Japanese surrender, it was divided North Korea (Soviets) and South Korea (USA). In my opinion, Korea should have been kept as one country, then there will be no N. Korea and no S. Korea and therefore, no invasion by the North. China knows N. K's point of view, but we cannot afford to keep supporting N.K forever. China always support denuclearisation of N.K, but we are also loosing our influence of N. K as time goes by. Kim Jung Il (ex-leader of N.K) visited China before, but Kim Jung Un did not. We need to start with small punishment first, but make sure it doesn't look like we are doing it purposely. That's why President Xi Jinping only implement this policy against N. K only after meeting with Trump, so it looks like China is working with USA.
    2
  10565. +Pedro Like I said, US was getting involved in civil war, which was none of their own business in first place. To answer your question, China did not even invade South Korea. China only joined the war after USA, and Chinese forced did not push past the 38 parallel into South Korea. So when did China invade South Korea? You are clearly being anti-Chinese and abusing racist slurs against Chinese people. Why other country's soldiers are not considered murderers as well? In fact, whichever country you are from, your people would need to kill other people at one point, so who in the world isn't descendant of murderers? Chinese people also feel sad at tragic state of N. Korea, but a collapse and refugee crisis is very serious problem. N. Korea has population of 24 million people, so which country would accept 24 million refugees? Already in Europe, the locals are complaining about Syrian refugees, so we do not want the same thing to happen to China. Regime collapse will also trigger more starvation and deaths than the current situation too. Why is China being blamed for this mess that USA and Soviet Russia created? The N. Koreans are only interested in talking to USA and S. Koreans, not Chinese. N. Koreans always target US bases in East Asia, so what can China do? Chase away US forces from the region?
    2
  10566. +Pedro Yalu river is border between North Korea and China so why you keep insist China invaded South Korea? China only crossed Yalu river when USA was already pushing past 38 parallel into North Korean territory. Like I said, China entered the war because USA entered it first. When Korea was divided into North and South, then S. Korea territory was defined by 38 parallel line of division. So can tell you tell me if China cross this 38 parallel line into S Korea? No, because China did not. It was North Korean army that cross this line and began Korean Civil War.
    2
  10567. ***** You asked if China invade South Korea and I replied many times that China did not cross 38 parallel so why you don't understand? Yalu river is China and North Korean border, not S. Korea and is not the 38 parallel. You should read up on Korean geography like Mark said. I never denied China involvement, I only said China joined after USA joined the Korean war. North Korea almost succeeded in unifying Korea but USA intervened in their civil war first. Why you don't complain about their interference? At least China is region neighbor of Korea but USA is on opposite side of Pacific. I also explained that North Korea was created by Soviet Union so why are you blaming China again? Why Korea divided in first place? If there's no division then there's no invasion and so on.
    2
  10568. +Pedro If South Korea had practically won the war with US help, then why not say North Korea had practically won the war earlier, before USA intervened? North Korea had conquered 95% of whole Korea, but was prevented from unifying Korea, because of USA intervention. USA even pushed past 38 parallel into North Korean territory. Like I mentioned many times, did China cross 38 Parallel into South Korea? No, so how did China invade South Korea?
    2
  10569. + Captain Davy Wow, it already sounds more complex than Mandarin. Mandarin characters have only a single syllable so there is no stressed syllable (since there's only 1 syllable and 1 of 4 tones or no tone). Mandarin doesn't have many nasal sounds but many non-Mandarin speakers say that it sounds "sharp" compared to some other languages. Its funny how many people regard Chinese as a hard language because of memorization and tones but I'm sure other languages have their own special emphasis on pronunciation words correctly. Also, when we sing songs in Mandarin, we totally disregard the rules for tones! Each syllable fits to whichever note that it's on. So you can sing Mandarin songs perfectly without knowing proper tones for normal speech!
    2
  10570. +tk421missing As Chinese, I am atheist, but I do not think we are being controlled by Jews or Western capitalism. China maybe following capitalism (probably more so than other countries) when we join World Trade Organization, but our economy is still very much under government control. We will only follow a policy as long as it benefits us. When it becomes more of liability, we can choose to abandon it and pursue a better alternative.
    2
  10571. +EvolutionismAnti-Science Lie Bombarding me with walls and walls of text in both Chinese and English is not going help your argument and is only giving me a big headache. But I'll try to respond to each point, using only one language. -Big Bang theory only appears to violate both conservation of energy and mass *ONLY* if you assume the system was empty of energy and mass before the Big Bang. What was it like before the Big Bang? If there was energy and mass present, then those laws have not been violated. Remember that mass can be compressed into very, very small space (like neutron stars and black holes) -Primordial Soup experiment is not to prove creation of bacteria, but mostly to show that under certain conditions, complex organic molecules (CH4, RNA, DNA etc) can be created from simple inorganic precursors (C, H, etc) Bacteria lifeforms were much more advanced, and formed *later* from those organic molecules (DNA). Cooking soup will of course, kill bacteria, but primordial soup experiment uses only short lightning arcs (simulate thunderstrikes), not constant heating like cooking, to create organic molecules, but not complex life like bacteria. -Evolution does not work the way you mentioned. Evolving from simple organism to complex creature takes millions and millions of years. To see observe it in action, you will have to be immortal and to note *every feature* of the organism. There is proof of evolution in the form of embryos as human embryos have similarity to reptile, bird and other animal embryo. Humans are not special in anyway, otherwise why do we have tail bones? Why do we have wisdom teeth crammed into our small jaws, while Apes have big jaws that can fully accommodate all their teeth? We have evolved smaller jaw from apes due to cooking food making it tender so we have excess teeth remaining in our jaw. There is alot of evolution theory evidence and I have no time to explain everything. -Black and White baby twins. Indeed, there is recessive genes, which also explain why some people are born albinos or having blonde hair etc. Genetics and Race profiling are different fields and does not really relate to disproving evolution. It only shows that we are one human race. -Adam and Eve example was very confusing, but I think you are saying they contain all the necessary genetic makeup for creating everybody in the world today through complex recessive genes processes and so on. But, new studies have shown that humans also contained Neanderthal DNA (with Chinese having some of the highest) so how do Neanderthals factor into this explanation? Neanderthals were apparently human enough to breed with us, so not everyone in the world is descended from Adam and Eve only. (I hope I am not confusing you here) -Nazi and Japanese massacre of Jews and Chinese was not example of evolution, but *Fascism*, which is belief of superior race over others. Evolution would only have said to occur if Nazis and Japanese succeed in wiping out Jews and Chinese (a fifth of world population) off the face of the earth. -Century of Humiliation is not so much as racial superiority, but because of factors like British wanting Chinese tea, and selling us opium. They wanted China's resources and a market for their goods, but what has that got to do with atheist disbelief in God or evolution? It was capitalism that triggered it. -Indeed, Kong Fu Zi, Lao Zi and many people worshiped one God before creation of Qin Empire by Qin Shi Huang abolished most of their teachings. So we have been building out nation since Qin dynasty largely without belief in God, and has He punished us or affected us? Our wars to reunify China, and other Chinese history was because of our believe in ourselves and not because of God.
    2
  10572. +EvolutionismAnti-Science Lie Once again you are flooding me with a wall of text that only makes reading a pain and does not help argue your point effectively at all and is just giving me a migraine. -Primordial Soup Yes, Bacteria life is much more complex than simple organic molecules. But the experiment's purpose is to show that it is possible to create SOME of the basic building blocks for life there. They may be toxic or incorrectly rotating, but they were created nevertheless. The experiment wasnt trying to create life (I agree, science hasn't entirely proven that yet), but it is still a very, very, very minuscule step in that direction. There are probably hundreds or thousands more of these little steps to take before we can fully prove the creation of life. Your lighting strike fish pond example is just there to distract me. Of course there were no fishes in the pond before life itself was created. Primordial Soup experiment didn't even have already complex fish as raw input material, only whatever inorganic materials were present back then. I reiterate that the experiment was not trying to create fish out of the pond, but to create the building blocks needed for fish to eventually form out of the water. -Evolution Millions of years is commonly used, because it is needed to balance out the highly improbable probabilities. Everything related to life and biology appears impossible at first because of the extremely unlikely probabilities, but if you use billions of years, then the chances are greatly increased. Its like multiplying very small chance (0.000......0000001) by a very big number (1.0 x 10^999) to increase the chances. Me getting struck by lightning is not relating to the issue at hand. Lighting strikes are the input of energy into the system to create the extremely basic building blocks of life. These examples are just there to distract me is all and to curse upon me bad luck. Hitting the Jackpot is all not done on the same day. Like I said, its a very long series of steps spanning years. Creationists always use this "create complex life out of nothing in a single day" to discredit evolutionists. I mean no disrepect, but even God needed dust (basic building blocks) to create man and to breath (input of energy) life into him. A dog's intestine is already exceedingly complex, and his example is another creationist's "create something out of nothing" The theory of evolution has never stated anything complex to be created instantaneously. -That embryo picture doesnt really prove anything. Modern science has also studied embryos and found many similarities between humans and animals. For example, all sexual reproductive organisms start from egg and sperm, and human embryos also had gills once, but developed different from fish. Things like ears developing from the connection to jawbone shows that mammals evolved from reptiles. Like snakes do not have any ears or hearing capability, but can use their lower jaws to feel vibrations in the earth. Our eyelids have a remnant of what used to be translucent skin seen in crocodiles. Like I said, there are many, many, many examples of evolution to mention in this post alone. Even religious leaders also subscribe to that believe, despite being religious people -Vestigial, doesn't necessarily mean "useless" it simply means that the body can survive without it. For example, our tonsils (globe of flesh in the mouth) is not really related to evolution and we can survive without it. Same for tailbones, wisdom tooth and so on. I also had all four of mine taken out by the dentist. Actually the dinosaurs were all extinct long before the floods, so there is a myth of cavemen and dinosaurs interacting with each other. Big mammals like Elephants, Rhinos, Hippo etc would not have arisen if the herbivorous and carnivorous dinosaurs didnt go extinct. If dragons were dinosaurs, then what dinosaur did dragons resemble actually? Chinese dragon looks more like a snake or skink (snake-like lizard) than a dinosaur. The fact that you believe our ancestors had bigger skulls, already shows some belief in evolution and that the skulls shrunk. -if Neanderthals are humans then did God create them too? Why is there only Adam and Eve mentioned in bible then? Paleontologist have found numerous bones and some nearly complete skeletons of Neanderthals, which is why they can have realistic reconstructions. Lucy was a hominid, an early ancestor of humans. If Lucy and Nebraska man were frauds, what about Chinese Peking man and Java man and other hominids? Numerous other "hominids with names" were also found (Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_human_evolution_fossils) -I agree that China is probably more capitalistic now after Deng's reforms. So century of humiliation is caused by existence of China's own resources (tea, silk etc) was valuable to foreign powers. Japan invaded Manchuria because China has all the resources Japan never had. But, it was also caused by Fascism when Japanese saw themselves as superior to other Asians and my point was to simply show that Fascism is different from Evolution. Zheng He's voyages were grand and for trade, but it was more to showcase China's prestige than actual trade (capitalism). Zheng He's only took cargo of interest to him, like animals, giraffe etc instead of actually trading with the natives.
    2
  10573.  @Cougard3256  "Economic coercion is the most strong card right now." It's baffling that is exactly what the the U.S accuses China of. Economic coercion. Yet it's the U.S that's clearly partaking in this activity.
    2
  10574.  @lattelandlatteland  It all started because of a certain incident. Some Hong Konger (named Chan) flew to Taiwan with his pregnant girlfriend (named Poon) and proceeded to strangle her to death, and then flew back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body in Taiwan. Chan has since confessed and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice in Taiwan, but Hong Kong did not had existing extradition treaty with Taiwan. Since this crime occurred on Taiwan, Hong Kong courts are unable to pursue justice for the victims families. That's why HK Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to HK extradition bill to cover up this legal loophole.
    2
  10575. Russia has yet to call upon the services of their most invincible soldier, General Winters, to pay a visit to Europe and bring them back to the negotiating table regarding gas.
    2
  10576.  @derquantenalchemist5180  Wow. Good job in managing to get your message across, (despite YouTube tampering with your comments). From what you described, some thralls have a username that is deliberately offensive according to YT standards, which could be the reason why using @ resulted in your comment getting shadowbanned.
    2
  10577. Gonzalo Lira is alive and well. Video:youtu.be/R2yeSOcNlgE
    2
  10578.  GEO NEO  Because USA joined Olympics earlier than China, so they had more time to gather more gold medals.
    2
  10579.  @vaginaflop7523  Again, which part of the whole picture did I miss out? By now everyone should have seen the footage of a missile slamming into a apartment building in Kiev and leaving a gaping hole in the building that's still standing. Turns out that it was a Ukrainian Buk missile, not a Russian missile, that malfunctioned and hit their own civilian building in Kiev, but the Ukrainians reported it as a Russian cruise. Video: Missile or rocket hits residential building in Kyiv, Ukraine youtu.be/YBc0aVAQ790 Had it really been a Russian cruise missile, it would have leveled the entire building, not leaving the structure intact.
    2
  10580.  @boogle785  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. So who do you think is the real threat to global peace and stability here?
    2
  10581. +The Anti-White Ranger Ancient Chinese invented many inventions, such as the Four Great Inventions 四大发明 which have gone on to influence many aspects of human life. Paper and Printing help improved the way knowledge was recorded and spread to future generations. The Compass improved navigation, encouraged exploration and made long voyages more safer. Gunpowder has greatly influenced the way modern battles are fought.
    2
  10582. Frankly speaking, Mao Zedong was probably the more cunning of the two Chinese leaders. He knew how to utilise smaller numbers of troops to his advantage, pitting his two opponents superior forces against each and wearing them down slowly, and enabling the communist forces to eventually seize control of China, turning the small party (with only 50 members at the beginning of 1921) into the one of the world's largest political parties today (with over 80 million members) Honestly speaking, by many people's estimations, the small communist party should have been wiped out by the larger KMT (if it weren't for the Long March) and nobody could have predicted that such small communist party could eventually come to control all mainland China. Although Mao made some poor policies and was generally a poor governor of China, he was an excellent strategist during the war and the fact that the Communist Party could come to control China, right from the brink of extinction, is proof of Mao's superior tactics. At least in my opinion.
    2
  10583.  @jimwu9121  "神州 Shenzhou Then why did you criticised the expert is sly and persuasive…" Did I ever said that the expert is sly and persuasive?
    2
  10584.  @jimwu9121  "神州 Shenzhou I read it from other sections of this comment page of this video with your label 神州." Which other sections of this comment page?
    2
  10585.  @jimwu9121  You said: "Could be an error on my part" Then why did you accuse me of saying things that you can't prove?
    2
  10586.  @jimwu9121  China built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/b8cCsUBYSkw This makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity, some 856.4 billion kilowatt hours a year – more than double the amount produced by Brazil, in second place. The top three is completed by Canada, which produces 376.7 billion kilowatt hours a year. Source: China produces the most electricity from hydroelectric power weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/
    2
  10587.  @jimwu9121  China recently finished construction and opened the world's largest airport terminal in Daxing (大兴) International Airport in Beijing after only 4 years of construction. Video: Beijing Daxing International Airport is ready for takeoff youtu.be/OzYM5dMU1YM Video: China's newly-built Daxing International Airport officially put into operation youtu.be/-vnhgPHVdrw
    2
  10588.  @jimwu9121  China is even investing into Nuclear Fusion reactors, building an "Artificial Sun" that reached temperatures 6 times hotter than the Sun. Video: China Made An Artificial Star 6 Times Hotter Than The Sun youtube.com/watch?v=oGE9MmG4zhk A team at the Hefei Institutes of Physical Science of the Chinese Academy of Sciences announced that its Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) reactor, has hit a new temperature of reaching 100 million degrees Celsius. The EAST has been dubbed as “artificial sun” since it replicates the process used by the sun to produce energy. It burns at 100 million degrees Celsius, which is over six times hotter than the core of the sun. The temperature of the real sun’s core is at around 15 million degrees Celsius. The state-of-the-art reactor is designed to turn hydrogen into cost-effective green energy. Source: China builds an ‘artificial sun’ that is 6 times hotter than our ‘natural sun’ techworm.net/2018/11/china-artificial-sun-six-times-hotter-natural-sun.html Nuclear fusion is a project that if successful, would theoretically supply power for the entire globe and to greatly reduce our over reliance on dwindling fossil fuel energy sources that pollute the Earth.
    2
  10589.  @yslee1401  Nazi party was democratically voted into power by preying on German people's resentment towards the humiliating Treaty of Versailles and Hitler promised to make Germany great again. Just like Donald Trump was democratically voted into power by preying on gullible Americans resentment towards China and he promised to make America great again. So isn't Western democracy at fault here?
    2
  10590.  @stusanderson3111  Why bother sending any athletes at all? Why not commit to a full boycott of the Beijing Olympics if the USA believes in so-called human rights violations in Xinjiang? This half-hearted diplomatic boycott (but still sending officials in the end) by the US indicates that the USA doesn't even believe that there's genocide in Xinjiang. Another thing is that why the rest of the 5 Eyes countries (i.e Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand) blindly jump on the U.S boycott wagon only for the U.S to jump off and send officials to Beijing? The U.S is literally taking the other 5 Eyes countries for a ride and is now leaving them with the baby.
    2
  10591. OVER Infinity Many Chinese brands have gone and make themselves well-known outside of China, like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Lenovo, Haier, Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, and this list is not exhaustive. Among the world's largest Internet companies, there are more Chinese companies than Korean companies. List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies
    2
  10592. Cameras are everywhere today, virtually everyone has a camera phone to snap pictures wherever you are.
    2
  10593.  @bajaxbajax910  These are all the minor arguments they can be easily responded to. So why don't beavers build cities and skyscrapers like humans do? Why don't corals send spacecraft into outer space? Human civilizations are proof that man was meant to defy nature. And man didn't always dominate the Earth, prior to that, during the time of the dinosaurs, the environment was unsuitable for man (or mammals for that matter) to dominate the Earth. Agreed that humans do things like tell bedtime stories, get enchanted by fire, and so on. Humans didn't develop this overnight, they did it over many years. So once again, this is evidence that in future, humans in the far future may have values vastly different from humans today, and who knows, humans in the future may be the suitable environment for Marxism to thrive. The evidence you given for "animals don't laugh or cry" so far is speculative. What makes you think Marxism punishes virtues and promotes corruption? Marxism is all about how the rich (the bourgeoisie) control the poor (the laborers and workers) and how the poor might possibly overthrow the rich and establish an equal society. In order to establish a Marxist society, one must be truly "altruistic", to have an absence of classes, an absence of states and a completely humane society. Like I said above, you have to really treat strangers like friends, treat beggar like kings, treat kings without worshipping them, among other things. Humanity's current mental state is unable to accept such an advance way of thinking, but that does not mean it will not be possible in the future. Like I said earlier, if we modern humans somehow travel back in time and try to explain modern concepts like treating women and other races equally to our primitive ancestors, it's probable that they would regard us with shock and disgust. Therefore, it all boils down back to my original point, that humans in our current state, just isn't suitable environment for Marxism to thrive.
    2
  10594. Politics should be about doing what's right, not what's popular. Sometimes, the popular thing may not be right, and the right thing may not be popular.
    2
  10595.  @yslee1401  Those verified eyewitnesses were present there in Tiananmen Square on June 4th 1989 it self, how does there observations mean nothing at all? Furthermore, they were foreign observers like the Chilean diplomat, Reuters correspondent and Spanish TV crew, so how do their testimonies amount to nothing?
    2
  10596.  @yslee1401  We've already shown you, but you ignored the Chilean diplomat's eyewitness account, as well as those of the Reuters correspondent and the Spanish TV crew present inside Tiananmen Square June 4th 1989.
    2
  10597. Hong Kong Policemen reported some 240,000 protestors on the streets. But the "organizers" behind the protests purposely inflated the figures to more than a million.
    2
  10598. Rich Cohen When did I ever say I own Africa and Africans now? China runs a business, not a charity, and of course companies expect to make a profit off their investments. But the difference is that China is not forcing the Africans at gunpoint to give up the resources (like Westerners) but entering into a business transaction with them.
    2
  10599. Rich Cohen How is building roads, railways, highways and other infrastructure destroying Africa's future? With the basic infrastructure, African countries will now be able to attract foreign investors to invest in their country. Chinese companies even built refineries and hydroelectric dams, such as in Nigeria and Guinea, so that these countries can process the resources directly and power their economy, instead of having Africa's wealth shipped offshore to be processed. With the recent growth and economic improvement, more Africans students are returning to Africa after studies abroad in order to bring their skills and industry home. And how is that an excuse to insult me with racial slurs? Do I insult you with such slurs?
    2
  10600.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Singapore is the reason why democracy and freedoms work for Chinese people." Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. ... (Taken from Human Rights Watch: Singapore) Doesn't Singapore's system sound remarkably similar to China's?
    2
  10601.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou The president of Singapore is a mostly symbolic position." The President of Singapore draws a salary of $1,540,000 annually even though she doesn't hold real power, then what are Singaporeans paying her to do? To do nothing? You said: "Just like 宋慶齡 in China, she was unelected but doesn't hold real power." You can thank the Kuomintang for that. If anything, it just goes to show that the Republic of China period (1912-1949) under KMT wasn't a real democracy, it was more authoritarian than democratic. The KMT only held 2 elections throughout the entire 37 years of RoC. One in Dec 1912 and another in Jan 1948, that's all. You said: "Is there any problem for it?" Of course, it just goes to show that Singapore is not a democracy after all, if their president is unelected and doesn't even hold real power. Yet you claim that Singapore is the reason why democracy and freedoms work for Chinese people?
    2
  10602.  @MarkYeung1  Here's a post from a Singapore dissident blogger dating to 2018. "Singapore is not a democracy. We all know that. It is a system where a small elite of the family of Lee Kuan Yew deceased run the show. Unless you submit and are chosen, you have no say in the system regardless if you are citizen or not. It has no right to free speech and expression. Any public criticism is roundly crushed and if serious enough punished through their selected legal system. There are no free newspapers, no free media and everyone is closely surveilled day and night. They can do this because it is a small island." - Singapore Dissident blogger, Gopalan Nair.
    2
  10603.  @MarkYeung1  "Singapore is not a democracy. We all know that. It is a system where a small elite of the family of Lee Kuan Yew deceased run the show. Unless you submit and are chosen, you have no say in the system regardless if you are citizen or not. It has no right to free speech and expression. Any public criticism is roundly crushed and if serious enough punished through their selected legal system. There are no free newspapers, no free media and everyone is closely surveilled day and night. They can do this because it is a small island." ... (Source: Singapore Dissident blogger, Gopalan Nair.)
    2
  10604.  @MarkYeung1  If you read a post by Singapore dissident blogger Gopalan Nair, he says that Singapore is not a democracy, it is a system where a small elite of the family of Lee Kuan Yew deceased run the show. Unless you submit and are chosen, you have no say in the system regardless if you are citizen or not. It has no right to free speech and expression. Any public criticism is roundly crushed and if serious enough punished through their selected legal system. There are no free newspapers, no free media and everyone is closely surveilled day and night. They can do this because it is a small island.
    2
  10605.  @MarkYeung1  I suggest you read posts by actual Singapore dissidents, like blogger Gopalan Nair, who explains how Singapore is not a democracy, it's run by supporters of the "Lee Dynasty". The people have no say and any public criticism is roundly crushed and if serious enough punished through their selected legal system.
    2
  10606.  @MarkYeung1  Singapore is not a democracy. We all know that. It is a system where a small elite of the family of Lee Kuan Yew deceased run the show. Unless you submit and are chosen, you have no say in the system regardless if you are citizen or not. It has no right to free speech and expression. Any public criticism is roundly crushed and if serious enough punished through their selected legal system. Singaporean blogger Gopalan Nair.
    2
  10607.  @MarkYeung1  Singapore Dissident, Amos Yee, had uploaded a video to YouTube criticising the Singapore's founding father, Lee Kuan Yew, and he had gotten arrested by the police. How does this show that "Singapore is the reason why democracy and freedoms work for Chinese people."? The PAP has been in power in Singapore for 57 years (it's entire life as a nation) much like how People's Republic of China has been governed by CPC for 73 years.
    2
  10608.  @dajaca2586  said: "democracy is declining around the world." So why is democracy declining around the world then? Why allow ordinary people to participate in voting? Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (they don't turn up to vote, or they submit blank votes) they may make decisions based on emotions ("I don't like immigrants so I vote for Britain to leave EU") instead of logic. Or they may simply lack enough political awareness to make informed decisions regarding the country's future. That's how Donald Trump (with zero political experience himself) was able to seduce votes from gullible Americans with false promises of making America great again. At least in mainland China's example, if people want to vote, they join the communist party (not easy feat, you'll need to be top 5% of your field or industry) and work their way up to President, while garnering votes from other politically savvy communist members. Its not perfect system and not easy, but it has produced great leaders like President Xi, who has 30-40 years of political experience.
    2
  10609.  @Zsharma1  American healthcare workers look overwhelmed, tired, overworked and ill-equipped, facing shortage of masks, gloves, goggles, faceshields, PPE suits and ventilators, and what does US government does about? State governments have to bid for the medical supplies. Whereas Chinese doctors and nurses look well-equipped in comparison.
    2
  10610.  @bartonlee3594  "I love how all of the Chinese Nationalist Echo Chamber (CNEC) loves Putin." Lol, who ever said anything about Putin in this thread (before you specifically brought him up yourself)? People in this thread have been talking about Biden and the Republicans, how does that suddenly translate to Chinese talking about Putin?
    2
  10611.  @wheresmyeyebrow1608  Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by the rest of the world, until a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china) which were in great demand throughout the ancient world.
    2
  10612.  The Snurger  70 million killed? Then why is China currently the country with the world's largest population at 1.4 billion people, if so many people were supposedly killed?
    2
  10613.  @ZeldaZiplock  1) Even though the grain-eating sparrows were killed, Chinese farmers reared insect-eating livestock like chickens and ducks, and our rice fields had insect-eating frogs and fishes. Sparrows weren't the only insect-eating animals. 2) The local provincial governments lied about harvests and exaggerated the crop yields to Chairman Mao. When Mao visited the fields, local governors had stalks from poorer fields transplanted into better fields to give the illusion of a "bumper harvest" so Chairman Mao believed that there was sufficient grain to export to the Soviet Union to repay them for imported Soviet agricultural machinery. Because the data from below are reporting high yields, so how is Chairman Mao to blame when the local governments lied to him? 3) The Great Leap Forward represented PRC's first attempt to industrialise and modernise. Would you have preferred China to remain dirt-poor agricultural country forever and never industrialise? And China was around 90% agricultural at that time, so obviously the steel workers had to come from the farmers. It was thanks to backyard furnaces that many workers gained experience with metallurgy and this paved the way for China's eventual industrialisation under Deng's 1970s economic reforms. Steel production in China actually grew from 100,000 tonnes to 5.3 million tonnes during the Great Leap Forward. It was bad weather conditions like flood and drought that caused destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. In July 1958, the Yellow River flooded and affected 741,000 people in 1708 villages and inundated over 3.04 million mu (over half a million acres) of cultivated fields. The peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 m3/s (790,000 cu ft/s) with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kg/m3 (57 lb/cu ft), 14× and 24× their mean annual values, respectively. Source: 1958 Yellow River flood wikipedia.org/wiki/1958_Yellow_River_flood
    2
  10614.  @JO-et2ir  Swedish car company Volvo is currently owned by the Chinese company Geely Holding Group and currently, Volvo offers in the US only electrified models (mild hybrid, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or all-electric).
    2
  10615. Many Americans are shameful of what they did to Native Americans and African slaves, but they tend to blame their forefathers and wash their hands clean off their forefathers actions.
    2
  10616.  @larrysmith2123  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    2
  10617.  @jonathanhe7676  Dude, didn't you wrote this comment on another thread by @edge lord "There has never been a benevolent superpower in history. China is only nice now because it is not currently the strongest nation. If China becomes the sole superpower, you will likely see them spark conflicts across the world to remain the world’s sole superpower, just the like US is currently doing."
    2
  10618. @UCthwq1s4Wpg3I94q5y6_K4A "神州 Shenzhou do you believe that and you are ignorant and idiot" Why resort to hurling insults against me for my views? Why not attempt to attack my points instead of attacking me personally?
    2
  10619.  @stopwarstop7334  "神州 Shenzhou No matter what you say. Chiang Kai Shek was the ruler that time." So if the ruler Chiang kai-shek suddenly started purging communists, then he's the one killing our own Chinese brethren here. And you're claiming it doesn't give the communists and rights to call the Soviet, but the Nationalist KMT was receiving hundreds of millions of dollars of U.S military aid (at 2:10 of Cyrus' video). Yet the KMT was corrupt and pocketed some $750,000,000 worth of U.S military assets, so much such that even President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves"
    2
  10620.  @jameswhiteley6843  You said the Communist Party killed over 100 million of Chinese citizens when it came into power? China's population at that time was about 500 million, so are you saying the communists killed a whopping 20% of our population?
    2
  10621. Western leaders like to talk about "tackling climate change" by encouraging EV use, yet they impose tariffs on Chinese EVs.
    2
  10622.  @CT--gs1wj  The Hong Kong anti-mask law was invoked by Carrie Lam using powers bestowed by colonial Britain. Go blame the British for granting HK Chief Executive such authority. The Hong Kong extradition bill was proposed because of a certain incident. A Hong Kong guy named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, and stuff her body in her suitcase, before flying back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice for his crime, but Hong Kong has no extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to Hong Kong extradition laws. Do the HK protestors even know what they are protesting for? Have they read the bill and understood its contents in their entirety? And this extradition bill amendment was not put forth by mainland China, it was Carrie Lam's own doing, so how is mainland China interfering in HK's affairs. Video: Hong Kong's Lam Defend Extradition Bill youtu.be/jP4Dmry984w "This bill is not initiated by the Central People's Government (Beijing). I have not received any instruction or mandate from Beijing to do this." - HK Chief Executive Carrie Lam. And Hong Kong recently had their election resulting in landslide victory for pro-democracy candidates, whom now occupy more than 300 seats in their government, so how exactly is mainland China interfering in Hong Kong's elections? Beijing did not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections and Hong Kong clearly held elections so what's your problem?
    2
  10623. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    2
  10624.  @GooseGander  Because I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, and I was appalled at the sheer amount of Western anti-China propaganda out there. Whenever I bring up China's achievements, many Westerners just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill, or told me to "Go back to China if you like it there!"
    2
  10625.  @Nein9nein9nein There are about 144,000 places of worship registered for religious activities in China: -33,500 Buddhist temples (including 28,000 Han Buddhist temples, 3,800 Tibetan Buddhist lamaseries, and 1,700 Theravada Buddhist temples) -9,000 Taoist temples. -35,000 Mosques. -6,000 Catholic churches and 60,000 Protestant churches. There are approximately 5,500 religious groups in China, including seven national organizations which are Buddhist Association of China, Chinese Taoist Association, China Islamic Association, Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association, Bishops' Conference of Catholic Church in China, National Committee of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement of the Protestant Churches in China, and China Christian Council.
    2
  10626.  @INTJ791  Another issue is that whether TSMC wafer fabrication plants in Arizona will hire American workers, who need higher salaries, and thus, increasing the cost of its chips. If instead, had TSMC set up shop in mainland China and hire Chinese workers, then the cost of their chips will be lower.
    2
  10627.  @taimingchan8818  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    2
  10628. theylied1776 Did you know that there exists eunuchs that failed the qualifications and are rejected by the imperial family, even after being castrated?
    2
  10629.  @dagsmoko3889  The anti-corruption campaign in China has worked wonders in the communist party and reduced corruption at all levels in Chinese society. Whether it's the bigshots (tigers 虎) or the small fries (flies 苍蝇) the corrupted have been rooted out, just ask the Chinese people how much life has improved thanks to the anti-corruption campaign in China.
    2
  10630.  @quekjoseph8156  When did I ever said that USA cannot ban Tik Tok, WeChat and other applications? Please quote me my exact words saying that "USA cannot ban Tik Tok, WeChat, etc" because I never said what you are accusing me of. Also I never said Facebook, YouTube or Google is banned in China, I merely said that China blocked them, and people can always use VPN to access those websites of they want to. But look at Singapore, they have no strong Internet companies, whereas China is home to some of the world's largest Internet companies like Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, Suning.com, Bytedance (Tik Tok), Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, Kuaishou, Trip.com, Pinduoduo, Sina Corp, Sohu, and so on. Source: List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies#List But Singapore let Facebook, Google, YouTube dominate their Internet, so there's hardly any Singapore companies able to deal with these giants.
    2
  10631. Agreed. Corruption afflicts every country to a certain degree, but at least under President Xi there are crackdowns on corruption within the communist party and more than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption in China, including over 120 high-ranking officials, including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders. But when's the last time a country like USA had a crackdown on corruption?
    2
  10632. +Sam Shyam I'm sure CCP's leaders are just as real and accountable as Taiwan leaders. For example, under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-corruption crackdowns in the communist party and a number of high ranking corrupt members have been taken down. And when a new policy comes out, All CCP members vote ahead whether to proceed with the plan or not, and if affirmative, then the policy is put into motion. If negative, then no further mention is made to the public. For example, China built the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam that help supply China with renewable energy for more than 15 years already in order to fuel our growth. But there was much opposition to the dam's construction initially, but because the CCP can bulldoze the opposition, China can get things done quickly so that we can reap the benefits earlier. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtube.com/watch?v=b8cCsUBYSkw But if it were Taiwan, then such construction would probably be mired in protests, oppositions, activists, etc, and Taiwan would never get any work done at all. Even worst, Taiwan leader have to step down some day or can voted out, so how to make long term plans for Taiwan like that?
    2
  10633. +g China allows religions to practice in China, but all China is telling them is to put the country first and their religion second. For example, in 2017 China helped 12,800 Chinese Muslims go on a pilgrimage (Hajj) to the holy city of Mecca, joining about 2 million pilgrims from around the world on the pilgrimage to become a hajji, an honorific used in the Muslim community to refer to those who have finished their pilgrimage to Mecca, the holiest of all Islamic sites. Source: Chinese government goes to great lengths to help Muslims go on the Hajj dailymailnews.com/2017/08/15/chinese-government-goes-to-great-lengths-to-help-muslims-go-on-the-hajj/ Also, throughout 5000 years of Chinese history, there have been numerous benevolent emperors as well as tyrannical emperors of China, and the peasants still managed to overthrow the incompetent emperors even long before Chinese invented gunpowder. So why is there a need for you to justify the use of firearms to overthrow the government? I have never heard any stories of guns being used in self-defense by civilians in America and saving anyone's lives. And those school shootings didn't even need to take place at all, if Americans themselves surrender their right to bear firearms. Your country's kids are dying young, when there is no need to, all because Americans refuse to amend their gun laws!
    2
  10634. +Token Black Why are you resorting to making racial slurs against me here? President Xi Jinping is at least willing to tackle the mountain of corruption in the communist party, which previous Chinese leaders like Hu Jintao and Jiang Jiemin refuse to deal with. So why can't we leave him in power to maximise the benefits to China? Good leaders are hard to come by these days and it's a shame if they are forced to step down because of end of term limits.
    2
  10635. +Eric Christian I used logic to argue my points, so how am I brainwashed? For example, the people of Taiwan voted against the pro-independence DPP in the Taiwan midterm election, causing DPP to suffer major lost in 2 of its major posts, and even the pro-independence Taiwan President Tsai had tendered her resignation after this humiliating defeat. So doesn't this imply that majority of Taiwan people reject independence, given that they voted against Tsai?
    2
  10636. Robert Hardy I thought you were living in Australia. Furthermore, the Taiwan midterm elections are out and the pro-independence DPP suffered major defeat, losing 2 of its posts to the KMT, and even the pro-independence Taiwan President Tsai has resigned. I guess this means that majority of Taiwan people don't want independence given that they voted against Tsai.
    2
  10637. +silicon core said: "神州 Shenzhou brainwashed so sad better dead than red" China has pragmatically abandoned communist market system when we found it just wasn't working out for China, and in the 1970s, Deng Xiaoping adopted capitalist reforms, and today, China is said to be more capitalist than some Western countries. But it shows that China is willing to make necessary changes and abandon policies that don't work, but from your words, it looks like Westerners would probably defend democracy to the death.
    2
  10638. BARR When did ever said "Modern Mandarin is the same as Classical Chinese."? Can you quote me specifically where did I ever said such a thing?
    2
  10639. +Madara Uchiha Corruption in China is now much lower than it was in the past. Already several corrupted high ranking communist members (nicknamed "tigers") have been taken down and as of 2016, the campaign has 'netted' over 100 corrupt officials. List of Officials implicated by China's Anti-corruption Campaign wikipedia.org/wiki/Officials_implicated_by_the_anti-corruption_campaign_in_China_(2012%E2%80%932017) Also, during his presidential campaign, didn't Donald Trump promise to reveal his tax details if he were elected president? But after President Trump came to power, he hasn't revealed his tax details like he promised.
    2
  10640. @Rody Code If majority of Taiwan people don't want independence then why did they voted against pro-independence DPP? Instead they voted for the KMT which is pro-reunification! So where's your proof that the majority of the people of Taiwan don't want reunification, when they voted for KMT?
    2
  10641.  @Minecraftizawsom  If President Xi Jinping can replace corrupt CCP officials with his own people whom are uncorrupted, then I would claim the anti-corruption campaign is successful. Otherwise who else is going to replace those corrupted officials, if not people that Xi Jinping can trust? We need to at least start from somewhere with the anti-corruption crackdown.
    2
  10642. Rody Code  People change their minds all the time (or they can't make up their minds) so how do you know what they want at any point in time? I mean why are you quoting past votes to support your current claim that "The majority of Taiwan don't want reunification either"? You were talking about the the present not the past isn't it? You said I "have the wrong idea that KMT's win means the people want to embrace CCP" but when did I ever said that? I never said that the people of Taiwan have to embrace the CCP! In fact, China has extended the "One Country, Two Systems" to allow Taiwan to keep its government and the mainland to keep ours, while remaining unified as a single China. No other country except for China, allows two systems to exist within their borders. It's as though North Korea and South Korea agree to unify as single Korea, while allowing both states to keep their own respective governments.
    2
  10643. Rody Code  Again why are you bringing up past votes in 2008 and 2012? Also the Taiwan midterm elections seems to indicate that the majority of Taiwan people don't want independence, since they voted against the pro-independence DPP. Otherwise, why did they vote against the DPP then? You said "you think a single election win today means majority of Taiwan wants reunification?" but I clearly never said that! When did I ever said such a thing? Can you quote me my words claiming that majority of Taiwan wants reunification? You said "Do you seriously believe pro-unification minority can suddenly become majority in 2 years" but I clearly never said that! Why are you putting words into my mouth here? You said "Unification means become part of PRC which implies majority is OK under CCP rule" but who said that Taiwan will be under CCP rule? China has offered the "One Country Two Systems" policy to Taiwan to allow them to keep their government so how will Taiwan be under CCP rule? About Hong Kong, all Beijing does is approve the candidates, but in the end, the candidates are voted in by Hong Kong. This is part of the agreement China made with Britain during the Hong Kong handover.  According to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 香港基本法第四十五條 The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government. If you disagree with this One Country Two Systems, proposition then what exactly do you propose? China offered the One Country Two Systems policy to Taiwan but Taiwan just reject it and did not offer a counterproposal of its own! The PRC fought to regain control of the mainland so why should China grant Taiwan government equal status as the mainland?
    2
  10644. +Rody Code You were the one who claimed "The majority of Taiwan also don't want reunification either" so all I did was ask you proof of your claims that's all. How does this imply that I think majority wants reunification? All I did was ask you for proof of your claims that's all. And your statement clearly meant that the present, not 10 years ago so why are you quoting past votes to support your current claim? In that statement I clearly used the word "seems" so how is that misleading? And now you claim "Majority of Taiwan never want independence to begin with, nor do they want reunification"? Why do you make blatant statements that you yourself can't proof? Now where did I ever mention that KMT candidates are confident enough to propose "reunification" in 2020 election? Under China's One Country Two Systems, the people of Hong Kong can vote for candidates whereas all Beijing does is approve the candidates that's all. That's part of HK Basic Law article 45, and Beijing does not get to vote for which candidates they want. The most basic definition of democracy is that the people get to vote for their leaders and in the end, HK's leaders are voted in by HK. So how is this not democracy you tell me? The people of HK are voting for their leaders after all. Both People's Republic of China and Taiwan agreed to the One China policy in which Taiwan is part of China. Its literally written into Taiwan constitution after all. I mean if you disagree with One Country Two Systems policy then how else do you propose to solve the problem then? The communists fought to regain control of the mainland during the Chinese Civil War. During the civil war, the communists were poorly trained peasants, their weapons were crappy, and they had far fewer numbers than the KMT. On the other hand, KMT had wealth (they taxed the peasants for money) they had superior weapons, better training, superior numbers, yet despite all these advantages, the KMT still lost control of the mainland and had to flee to Formosa. This demonstrated gross incompetence of KMT in their right to rule the mainland so why should they be treated as equals as the mainland?
    2
  10645. +Rody Code You're claiming data from 10 or 20 years ago and passing it off as proof? What sort of logic is this? And I asked for proof from your statement that majority of Taiwan don't want reunification either, not for the status quo. Taiwan Internet tends to be filled with the younger generation of Taiwan people, so its opinions may not reflect those of the majority of Taiwan. Most of the older generations of Taiwan people don't log onto the Internet and many still have families on the mainland. I used the term "seems" so how is that misleading? And when did I ever made that statement from weeks ago? Unification Promotion Party is not as seasoned as the KMT, that's why it's not popular. The communist party had only 50 members at the beginning of 1921, yet today the communists are in control of the mainland and is among the world's largest political party, with a strength of 80 million members (around the population size of Germany). So why didn't the communists achieve the impossible? Nobody expected the communists to win, yet they succeeded. The KMT received supplies from USA, but they were so corrupted that they pocket 750 million dollars worth of US aid. Even US President Truman made a remark that "the Chiang were all thieves". As for doing most of the fighting, the communists had smaller numbers so they resorted to tactics suitable for smaller force to fight against a larger force, such as guerrilla warfare. But even after Japanese surrender, the KMT had superior numbers compared to communists, yet they still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa? This demonstrates gross incompetence in KMT's right to rule the mainland. The current HK Chief Executive Carrie Lam, won the 2017 election with 777 votes out of 1200, in which Beijing did not get to vote at all. So how is this not democracy, since the HK leader was voted in by HK? The basic requirement for democracy has already been met. I mean, are you even from Taiwan yourself? Then why do you care so much about Taiwan?
    2
  10646. +Gamer Lycan China today is peaceful and not at war since our last major war in 1979. Instead of making war, China is helping make Asia strong through economic trade and developing infrastructure in less developed countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Angola, etc. Whereas the USA is involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Libyan War, Afghanistan War, etc, even in the 21st century! USA is bombing those Middle Eastern countries, killing civilians and destroying property, earning resentment from the locals who are left homeless and jobless and many flock to join the terrorists. So who is the country bullying others here?
    2
  10647. @NopFor OpposingForce China runs a business, not a charity drive. Nobody force those other countries to borrow from Chinese banks if they don't want to. But those countries tend to be plagued by civil unrest, social insecurity and unstable governments. If they want, they could always loan money from Western banks like IMF, but IMF refuse to invest money into these countries, and that's why they borrow from China.
    2
  10648. @NopFor OpposingForce China is not "giving away" money, we are investing money to help develop infrastructure in these countries, so that they will become more attractive for foreign investors to come and set up businesses there. Similar to these countries, China was once dirt poor, war torn, starving country in the past, but we found success by building infrastructure in our country. So we are offering to do the same thing to other countries. In the future when these countries eventually become developed, they should be able to pay off their debts when the revenue starts flowing in.
    2
  10649. @NopFor OpposingForce It was China ourselves that decided to open up, under Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms, not President Nixon's visit to China. Also, when the World Trade Organization was formed in 1995, China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate our country as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because United States and its allies requested that China first reform various tariff policies, including tariff reductions, open markets and industrial policies. The US imposed additional conditions on China and when China joined the WTO, we agreed to considerably harsher conditions than other developing countries. Why is that? So how exactly did USA help China? We could have been a founding member of WTO, but US prevented that and only in 2001 was China finally allowed to join the WTO. As for copyright and intellectual property, ancient Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions 四大发明 which have greatly influenced the rest of the world. Paper and Printing made the recording and transmission of knowledge much easier. The Compass made navigation much easier and hazardous journeys more safer and reliable. And Gunpowder has greatly influenced the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about foreigners using our inventions? As for those countries with poor human rights, how do you ever expect them to escape the poverty and develop themselves at all, if you refuse them loans because of human rights violation? These countries need capital in order to kick start their country's industrialization and progress, and China is providing a chance for them to develop themselves with loans and infrastructure development. Otherwise, what is you proposed solution to the problem if you seem to reject what China is doing? Those countries human rights aren't going to improve themselves at all at this rate.
    2
  10650. @NopFor OpposingForce How exactly did Nixon help China open up? China ourselves choose to open our doors, just like we can choose to close our doors ourselves. As for Communism, Karl Marx believed that the capitalist bourgeois and their economists were promoting what he saw as the lie that "the interests of the capitalist and of the worker are ... one and the same", therefore he believed that they did this by purporting the concept that "the fastest possible growth of productive capital" was best not only for the wealthy capitalists but also for the workers because it provided them with employments. In short, according to Kal Marx, capitalism was good because it promoted both the interests of capitalists and workers. Who says we hate Chinese products? Chinese brands like Huawei, Lenovo, Xiaomi, ZTE, Oppo, etc have grown to become world class brands. Here is list of the world's top 10 smartphone brands and Chinese brands are consistently ranked among the top 10 in the world. Top 10 Smartphone brands in the world in 2017 marketing91.com/top-smartphone-brands/ Top 10 Smartphone Brands in the World techzac.com/top-10-smartphone-manufacturers-in-the-world/ As for China's investment strategy, if you take all the time in the world to consider contracts and negotiate, then you are only wasting valuable time. I mean, Chinese investors are clearly prepared to deal with the risks and absorb potential losses, then what's wrong with proceeding with investment? No risk, no gain, like people say. I shall reiterate again: "Otherwise, what is you proposed solution to the problem if you seem to reject what China is doing? Those countries human rights aren't going to improve themselves at all at this rate." You just seem to criticise China's investments, without offering a viable solution of your own.
    2
  10651. @NopFor OpposingForce Firstly, why do you think China has to follow 100% of what Marxism is all about? Under President Xi, China is currently following "Socialism with Chinese characteristics" so its not strictly all about communism, Marxism, Maoism, or other philosophies. It could possible that in the future, democracy would be introduced, but as of now, many Chinese feel that democracy is not the right choice for China. About Intellectual Property and copyrights. in my opinion, IP rights doesn't really promote innovation, because creative people are encouraged to come up with a single good idea, file for IP rights, and then sit back and collect money from the copyright laws, instead of constantly innovating. Then on the other hand, other creative but struggling innovators are denied access to the full spectrum of available tools and materials, because of copyright laws, and they may become 'paralyzed' because they can't proceed without infringing on someone's else's copyright. Thus IP rights may actually hinder creativity rather than promote it, from what I described above Your solution about removing CEOs and letting the workers own the company, that sounds almost exactly like Mao Zedong's Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, where the intellectuals were put to work in farms and the farmers were put to work in intellectual positions. And you can see the results of Mao's Cultural Revolution on China. The thing is, I'll bet you don't really care about China, I would even venture to say nobody cares for China's interests except Chinese. Nobody wants to see China succeed except Chinese. Nobody can defend China except Chinese. I watched Western media about China, and they literally demonize literally everything about China, and saying China should follow the Western style and so on. Why should China do that? Why can't we do things our own way?
    2
  10652.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Yes an E-mail definitively made by her of her accord being held hostage," Where's your evidence from that E-mail that Peng Shuai is held hostage? I've clearly established that there are open channels of communication between Peng Shuai and WTA.
    2
  10653.  @V01DIORE  "Wikileaks would be foolish to say otherwise biased "eye witness" reports or not." Let's have a look at what Wikileaks says. A Chilean diplomat (Carlos Gallo) who was present in the square described the situation to his U.S. counterpart, stating that the Chinese soldiers were armed with only truncheons and wooden clubs. He said there was no mass firing into crowds of demonstrators at the Monument to the People’s Heroes.
    2
  10654.  @dalegratton4776  Chairman Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Chairman Mao can't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he'll wish for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. Under Chairman Mao's leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US
    2
  10655.  @dalegratton4776  About the One Child Policy, in the past China was still dirt-poor country, suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems at that time. Why allow families in China to raise multiple kids, only for them to starve to death, succumb to childhood diseases, and having not enough food, not enough hospitals, and not enough schools to send them all to? Why not make families focus all available resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood, and get him into a good school? According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china Look at India, world's 2nd largest population country, and India is suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems that China once suffered from in the past.
    2
  10656.  @Madasin_Paine  About the chip industry, humans are approaching the theoretical limit of just how small companies like TMSC can manufacture silicon-based chips. After which it would be physically impossible to make chips any smaller, and Moore's Law would be broken. However, alternatives like carbon-based chips using graphene, exhibit promising results such as better conductivity, better heat dissipation and better efficiency than the silicon-based chips used in TSMC, and mainland China is investing in carbon-based chip fabrication technology.
    2
  10657.  @isaiahdelacruz5564  Why are you calling it by it's improper name? It's proper name is Covid-19 as designated by WHO, not "Kung Flu". The origins of Covid-19 are still unknown, and there's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    2
  10658.  @Fantasy-kx4rz  While Peng Shuai did not initially agree to have sex, she consented to it in the end. She eventually agreed to it and from that day on, she renewed her love with him and shared many activities together like couples do. Here's what Peng Shuai wrote later: "Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well. We talking about recent history, as well as ancient eras. You educated me on so many topics, and we had discussions about economics, politics. We never ran out of things to talk about. We played chess, sang, played table tennis, played pool and also played tennis together. We always had endless fun. It was as if our personalities fit perfectly together." That doesn't sound like someone who's been sexually assaulted. In truth, it's a lovers quarrel between both sides and there is no true victim, but the Western media is trying to paint Peng Shuai as the victim and the Communist Party of China as the aggressor.
    2
  10659.  @Fantasy-kx4rz  Here's a translation of all 1600 characters in Peng Shuai's entire post: https://youtu.be/cvTUvvePJYg
    2
  10660.  @Fantasy-kx4rz  You said: "In fact, she even said that she only agreed because of the emotional pressure in that moment." What emotional pressure in the moment? Peng Shuai had previously known Zhang for seven years earlier, and she was remembering the times she shared with Zhang, he said he had never forgotten her and he would treat her well, that's why she consented to sex in the end. And after that, Zhang did treat her well (according to her words) they had discussions about economics, politics, played chess, sang, played table tennis, played pool and tennis (her own specialty). And Peng Shuai is not a good person, she has admitted many times in her full post that she was bad and a hypocrite.Peng Shuai wrote at the beginning of her post: "I know I cannot explain this clearly, and even if I say it, it won't matter, but I still want to let it out. I am a hypocrite. I admit I am not a good woman, and am in fact, a very very bad woman." "In the middle of all of this, I never thought I was a good woman. I hated myself, I hated why I came to this world." "Everything that has happened, I deserve it. I have brought everything upon myself." (This line I quoted showed that she consented to the relationship, as twisted as it is.) "I am a bad woman who doesn't deserve to be a mother, but you are a father with both boy and girl." Ultimately, this is a lovers quarrel between the two of them (and nothing to do with the Communist Party of China) and Peng Shuai should take some time off and get her affairs in order and settle this issue internally. But the WTA is demanding that she appear in public to bare more of her private life for all the world to see, based on a misunderstanding of a sexual assault when there is none in her post.
    2
  10661.  @Fantasy-kx4rz  But Peng Shuai consented to sex in the end because of feelings she had for him since seven years ago as mentioned "A no should be a no and that's it." You said "should be", because in this case the no eventually became a yes and she consented to sex. You're using a very black and white way of thinking that no means no. allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. The email also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent. "Apparently, he didn't want to take responsibility so I doubt there was much love from his side." Zhang treated her well (according her words) and they had discussions about economics and politics, played chess, sang together, played sports (including tennis) and did many activities together. There was clearly a level of love in their relationship if she felt that their personalities fit together. "The rest of your comment (starting from 'And Peng Shuai is not a good person') is just victim blaming." How? I'm quoting Peng Shuai's own words that she called herself a bad person indicating that she's aware of doing bad things in the relationship, then how am I victim blaming? On the other hand, it appears that your trying to victimise Peng Shuai and demonise Zhang only, when it's a lovers quarrel and there is blame on both sides. ... Lastly, Peng Shuai is not pressing charges. On 17th November, Peng Shuai wrote an email to WTA saying that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    2
  10662.  @Fantasy-kx4rz  It was consensual, Peng Shuai wrote in her post that she consented to sex in the end. "It would have still been a 'no' if she weren't under emotional distress, taken advantage of by a much older and more powerful man." But the no has morphed into a yes, she consented to sex. The day after that, Peng Shuai renewed her love for Zhang as she wrote in her post. She wrote: Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. "How do you know for sure? Have you been there?" Peng Shuai did not press any charges of sexual assault, and she repeatedly said that the allegations of sexual assault are not true. Recently, Singaporean Newspaper Lianhe Zaobao interviewed Peng Shuai and she once again denied the allegations of sexual assault. "He left her two times without saying anything. He put guards in front of the door when they had sex so noone could leave or enter. He said "I hate you". Does that sound like he truely loved her?" That "I hate you" was before she consented to sex, but the day after, she renewed her love for him. Here's what she wrote and the examples of activities they shared together Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well. We talking about recent history, as well as ancient eras. You educated me on so many topics, and we had discussions about economics, politics. We never ran out of things to talk about. We played chess, sang, played table tennis, played pool and also played tennis together. We always had endless fun. It was as if our personalities fit perfectly together. You are ignoring the good points and just trying to demonize Zhang while trying to victimize Peng Shuai. "Also, Peng Shuai not pressing charges doesn't prove anything." At the very least, it shows that's Peng Shuai's private affair. Here's Singapore reporter interviewing Peng Shuai where she denied that she had made any accusations, saying in Mandarin "I have never said or written that anyone has sexually assaulted me, I have to clearly stress this point", and that there had been misunderstandings about her post on Weibo. Video:youtu.be/ZF9Owb9uSOE
    2
  10663.  @Fantasy-kx4rz  "No, it was not and you won't find her writing that she consented to it either. If so, then please quote it." Here, let me quote Peng Shuai's own words saying that she consented to sex: Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. You said: "You write that like it happened magically. Any no can 'morph' into a yes if you put the other party under enough emotional pressure and this was clearly given here." Because the "no" transformed into a "yes," and if you read her words, Peng Shuai renewed her love for Zhang Gaoli, so isn't it magical? Even Peng Shuai remarked that Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing, so it may have been magical in her eyes. And thus far, even you failed to show how the "no" remained a "no", then what's the basis for your claims of sexual assault? You said: "Again, her not pressing charges doesn't prove anything." It clearly means that she's not pressing charges and her post doesn't even have any allegations of sexual assault, then what are you going to do? Press charges in her place? You said: "Also, she denied all of this after weeks." Again, it's because she's trying to keep a low profile until this all blows over, that's why she's been avoiding the public eye all this time. But the WTA is demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see. You said: "We don't know what happened in the meantime so that's not really a prove either." So that's only speculation that "something happened" in the meantime, but you don't have proof that something really happened? You said: "Maybe she did, but he obviously never truely loved her. The 'I hate you' is prove enough for that. Noone says that to someone he or she loves." Again, your being one-sided. People who love each other sometimes say things to hurt each other (like Peng Shuai said, Romance is complicated) and quarreling lovers sometimes say "I hate you" in their arguments. Also, the "I hate you" was spoken before she consented to sex. You said: "Peng Shuai obviously still had feelings for Zhang, hence the romantic words," So since you admit that she had feelings for Zhang, then why is it inconceivable to you that she consented to sex? Zhang clearly treated Peng Shuai well after that, she said he was a very good person to her, and they had discussions about history, economics, politics, sang and played chess and sports like table tennis, pool and also tennis (her speciality). She describes it as "always having endless fun", ... Peng Shuai herself has repeatedly denied the allegations of sexual assault, she said in Mandarin: "I have never said or written that anyone has sexually assaulted me, I have to clearly stress this point", and that there had been misunderstandings about her post on Weibo. She also stated that the state media translation of her earlier email to Simon denying allegations of sexual assault was accurate. Video:youtu.be/ZF9Owb9uSOE
    2
  10664.  @Fantasy-kx4rz  "Read it again and tell me where she used the word 'consent'. She only said that she agreed" Do I really need to teach you English now? Agreed = Consent. They are synonyms in the English language, just like concur, accede, accept, and so on. Or let's look at Peng Shuai's words in Chinese, she said: 是的就是我们发生性关系了 "I agreed... we had sex" You said: "She said 'no' in the beginning, meaning she didn't want to have sex." But the "no" transformed into a "yes" afterwards, and she renewed her love for him from that day onwards. Peng Shuai wrote in Chinese 从那日后我再次打开了对你的爱 "From that day on I opened my love for you again" so isn't it magical in this sense? You said: "Also, she 'renewed' her love AFTER they had sex, so no, this is not 'magical'." So clearly this means that the "no" has morphed into a "yes" since she renewed her love AFTER she consented/agreed to have sex. Then why is it not magical? You said: "Peng Shuai even said herself that she was forced to have sex, read her post again." That was before. But the "no" has changed into a "yes", and you have no evidence that the "no" remained a "no". You said: "How do you know this? Any proof for this claim?" Because she did not show up in social media for weeks? This means she's laying low and avoiding the public eye, but the WTA constantly calls unwanted attention to her time and time again. You said: "I never said that I have proof that something happened. How should I? I only said that we don't know, hence we should be careful with any assumptions." So you have no proof that "something happened" in the meantime. Then why do you seemingly have the assumption that something happened? You said: "Yes, but you don't say "I hate you", not when you truely love somebody." Lovers might say such a unpleasant thing in the heat of the moment during a lover's quarrel. I mean, even outside of romantic love, in a loving family, a small kid might suddenly throw a tantrum and shout "I hate you" to his/her parents. But as time goes by, both the parents and kid know that he/she didn't really mean those words "I hate you" so why are you claiming that this 3 words define their relationship when it's obviously more complex than that? You said: "It also doesn't matter when it was spoken. In fact, since it was spoken before they had sex, this likely served to further increase the emotional pressure on her." Yes, the "I hate you" was spoken before she consented to sex, and afterwards, she renewed her love for him and they had discussions about history, economics, politics, sang together, played chess, pool, table tennis, tennis (her specialty) and Peng Shuai truly felt that their personalities matched and had fun everyday. So obvious, Zhang didn't mean those words "I hate you" if he treated her so well afterwards. You said: "Because that's not the whole picture. The whole picture is that Zhang took advantage of Peng Shuai's emotional insecurity in this moment, emotionally abusing her to spend some time with her and left her when he had enough of her." Again, that's your own one-sided picture in your obvious attempts to victimize Peng Shuai while demonizing Zhang Gaoli, you repeatedly ignored the times Peng Shuai knew she was a bad woman. And this is not my own words, Peng Shuai herself said: "I know I cannot explain this clearly, and even if I say it, it won't matter, but I still want to let it out. I am a hypocrite. I admit I am not a good woman, and am in fact, a very very bad woman." "In the middle of all of this, I never thought I was a good woman. I hated myself, I hated why I came to this world." "Everything that has happened, I deserve it. I have brought everything upon myself." (This line I quoted showed that she consented to the relationship, as twisted as it is.) "I am a bad woman who doesn't deserve to be a mother, but you are a father with both boy and girl." You said: "I have already replied to that, this doesn't prove anything as she said that weeks after the actual incident." It proves that Peng Shuai is not pressing charges, and she has repeatedly told WTA that the allegations were false. And I don't understand what you mean as she said the weeks after the actual incident, are you implying "something happened" in the meantime, without any proof? Peng Shuai's private affairs are her own, and frankly none of your business and none of my business, and most importantly, none of the WTA's business. Peng Shuai has expressed the desire for her personal privacy to be respected in a video call with IOC, but the WTA is demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life details, instead of respecting her wishes for privacy.
    2
  10665.  @Fantasy-kx4rz  "Tell me: If someone points a gun at you and wants you to agree to something, then you agree." But Zhang Gaoli didn't point a gun at Peng Shuai and force her to have sex with him, she agreed because of her feelings for him. If at first you don't want to buy a product from a salesman, but after some persuasion, the salesman manages to convince to buy his product, then you agreed in the end. You said: "She said yes because she was under emotional pressure, how often do you want me to repeat this?" So you agreed that the "no" transformed into a "yes" then. I only repeated because you seem to think the "no" remained a "no", which is not true. You said: "Once again, it was changed into a 'yes', because there was emotional pressure on her." So once again you agreed that the "no" transformed into a "yes" then. Then we have confirmed this, and you have no proof that the "no" remained a "no". You said: "And she wrote the post AFTER all this, so it wasn't 'before'." But in the post, she wrote the "I hate you" before she had sex. You said: "No, this doesn't mean she's laying low. This is no proof whatsoever." Not going on social media for weeks means that she's keeping a low profile, because clearly, she's not as prominent socially as before. That means she's laying low. You said: "Strawman from your side. I never said that something happened." I was probing you for your view, and now we have confirmation that you never said "something happened" during the meantime then. Alright, so if there's no assumption that something happened during those weeks then, then why did you say earlier that "this doesn't prove anything as she said that weeks after the actual incident."? You said: "You're misinterpreting things such that they fit into your narrative of a love relationship which was clearly not given in this case." It was a love relationship given that Peng Shuai and Zhang Gaoli spent time together, and he treated her well (according to her words) they had discussions about history, economics, politics, sang together, played chess, pool, table tennis, tennis, and Peng Shuai remarked that they "had endless fun". You said: "He didn't treat her well, he ghosted her." That was before she consented to sex. I mean, it's evident that you trying to wholly victimize Peng Shuai and wholly demonize Zhang Gaoli, when it's apparent that it's their own lover's quarrel and she consented to the sex and the relationship, even knowing that Zhang was married. You said: "I could blame you for the exact opposite, you're obviously attempting to demonize Peng Shuai. The difference between us is, that I see the full picture while you create your own narrative." I pointed out that Peng Shuai is not a good person, and she has admitted many times in her full post that she was bad and a hypocrite, but how's this demonizing Peng Shuai? On the other hand, you absolutely refuse to acknowledge anything good that Zhang Gaoli did, even though it's evident from Peng Shuai's words that she consented to sex and she enjoyed her time with him. Then you're not showing the whole picture, only your one-sided narrative that's all. You said: "Let me ask you another question: If the post had no bad intentions whatsoever, then why was it removed from chinese social media?" Possibly Peng Shuai removed it because she found it too embarrassing? In Chinese culture, it's still considered shameful for a woman to date a much older guy (especially a married one) and that's probably way she kept saying that she's been a bad woman (her words, not mine). ... At the end of the day, this is Peng Shuai and Zhang Gaoli's private affair and it's up to themselves to settle their differences. It's frankly none of your business and none of my business, and most certainly none of the WTA's business. Peng Shuai has expressed the desire for her personal privacy to be respected in a video call with IOC, but the WTA is demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life details, instead of respecting her wishes for privacy.
    2
  10666.  @Fantasy-kx4rz  You quoted "What Consent looks like" by rainn but what the heck is rainn? Is it a world recognised organisation that have authority over everything to do with sexual assault all over the world? Otherwise all you done is quote one definition of consent that's all, it does not mean that it's definition is recognised by the world. "Unequal power dynamics, such as engaging with an employee or student, also mean that consent cannot be freely given." You said the relationship between Zhang and Peng falls in this category of unequal power dynamics, but Peng Shuai is Not Zhang's employee or student then how does your comparison make sense? And the guard standing outside the door was to watch for Zhang's wife in case she decided to intrude. Even Peng Shuai confirmed this when she wrote: "someone helped guard outside, because nobody would believe that a wife would allow this." So your claim that I don't know the difference between "agree" and "consent" is only exposing your own ignorance that's all. I base my arguments on what she wrote on Weibo, whereas you perform all sorts of mental gymnastics just to argue your point. As for your last paragraph, I clearly stated that it's a possibility that Peng Shuai removed the post on her own, because it was embarrassing and airing out her personal private affairs was attracting unwanted attention. We know this because in the video call with IOC, Peng Shuai expressed her desire for privacy, but it appears that the WTA would have none of that and they are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see. On 7 Feb 2022, Peng Shuai announced her retirement from competitive tennis and that there had been a huge misunderstanding surrounding the accusation of Zhang, her disappearance from the Chinese internet, and her well-being, reiterating "I never said anyone sexually assaulted me". Peng also said the Weibo “post resulted in an enormous misunderstanding from the outside world. My wish is that the meaning of this post no longer be skewed” and claimed that she erased it. So it turns out I was right after all and that Peng Shuai erased the post on her own accord.
    2
  10667.  @Fantasy-kx4rz  So just because rainn is based in the United States, then it doesn't mean that it can speak on behalf of the rest of the world. And I didn't accept the definition, I merely pointed out that the relationship between Peng and Zhang doesn't even fall under the category of unequal power dynamics, since Peng is not Zhang's employee or student, which shows that you don't understand what the category even means. I said I was right about Peng Shuai erasing the post on her own accord, she even mentioned it on February 7, 2022, during her participation in French sports newspaper L'Équipe. Peng Shuai has been telling the Western world that they have mistaken her post so many times. We've even gone through Peng Shuai's post on Weibo several times, where there are no allegations of sexual assault in her post (you've repeatedly failed to point out where in her post did she ever said she was sexually assaulted) and she clearly stated that she consented to sex. You claimed the relationship falls under the category of unequal power dynamics, but Peng Shuai is not Zhang' employee or student so Zhang doesn't have any such power over her. What exhaustive explanation have you given? You literally quote external sources instead of looking at what Peng Shuai wrote on her post. You've repeatedly failed to highlight where in Peng Shua's post did she ever said she was sexually assaulted, whereas I pointed out the words where she consented to sex, and they resumed their long-term on-and-off relationship. This time they had discussions about economics, politics, played chess, sang, played table tennis, played pool and tennis, so it was apparent that she consented to the sex and now the relationship that followed. How is this relationship one of "unequal power dynamics" you've failed to explain. I've already made the conclusion that at the end of the day, this is Peng Shuai and Zhang Gaoli's private affair and it's up to themselves to settle their differences. It's frankly none of your business and none of my business, and most certainly none of the WTA's business. Peng Shuai has expressed the desire for her personal privacy to be respected in a video call with IOC, but the WTA is demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life details, instead of respecting her wishes for privacy. Peng Shuai has stated multiple times now that the Western world has misunderstood her Weibo post, and she has made it very clear that there are no allegations of sexual assault in her post. But people like you refuse to listen to her actual words or respect her desire for privacy.
    2
  10668. More people in Taiwan need to wake up and realize that USA does not care about Taiwan, as long as they can use the island as a chess piece to contain the mainland's rise.
    2
  10669. TheGolfdaily Its the US politicians that are abandoning their government posts, or being fired by President Trump. Look at the number of US politicians being fired within the White House for example.
    2
  10670.  @MarkYeung1  When President Jimmy Carter asked Vice Premier Deng Xiaoping on how he plans to handle Vietnam, Deng's response was "The child is getting naughty, it is time he got spanked". That's how the Sino-Vietnam War started because USA promised to develop economic relations with China if China do that.
    2
  10671.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "for those who said Ukraine should let Russia to rule over to minimize civilian casualties." There are Ukrainian cities (i.e Kherson, Melitopol, etc) that are raising the Soviet Flag in their administrative buildings and adopting the use of Russian currency (Ruble) in their markets, are you claiming that the people in these Ukrainian cities should be shamed?
    2
  10672.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou On 15 February, 1979..." Yes, that's after Vice Premier Deng visited the United States on 29 January 1979, and spoke to U.S President Carter. After the meeting, Deng suddenly announced to conduct a punitive attack (not a conquest) on Vietnam (a Soviet Ally), so it's clear that President Carter made a deal that China has to conduct a punitive attack on Vietnam in exchange for U.S economic incentives. Otherwise the U.S won't accept China if China did not do as they say. You said: "There was zero evidence of United States involvement to PUNISH Soviet Union" The goal was to punish Vietnam (a Soviet ally) not the Soviet Union itself. And the U.S kept its hands clean by making China do all the dirty work against Vietnam, in exchange for economic incentives. Because, after the Sino-Vietnam War, U.S-China relations started improving. Also, my question was: "Could you show me where did Jimmy Carter said that?" after you wrote: "神州 Shenzhou That's not a promise. Jimmy Carter will tell you that." so my question remains unanswered.
    2
  10673.  @t1990322  The current aborigines in Taiwan are descended from farmers from mainland China that migrated to the island some 5,000 years ago. Around 5,000 years ago, farmers from the southeast Chinese coast settled on the island. These people are believed to have been speakers of Austronesian languages, which dispersed from Taiwan across the islands of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The current Taiwanese aborigines are believed to be their descendants. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan)
    2
  10674.  @timothychung4811  The world followed China with paper money. Eventually they will do so with digital currency as well.
    2
  10675.  @user-fb2me3th6z  Who's really crying here? Isn't it the U.S?
    2
  10676.  @tomvanaarle2622  Yes, because you're clearly unable to refute me, that's why all you do is reject my proof that's all.
    2
  10677.  @bignoseYeu  China's ghost cities are being filled up over the years, as millions migrate from the rural countryside to the urban centers. For example, in 2011, the city of Zhengzhou was considered China's largest ghost city. But today, Zhengzhou is home to a population of 12 million inhabitants with GDP of 1.014 trillion (RMB) in 2018.
    2
  10678. Exactly, if your company support anti-gay protests, then gay customers will boycott your brand. If your company support anti-semitism, then Jews will boycott your brand. If your company support anti-China protests then naturally, Chinese customers will boycott your brand as well.
    2
  10679. Joshua Wong is idealistic and naive kid, whom instead of graduating from school, gotten swept up by political fervor. What has Joshua Wong ever done for Hong Kong, except stir up trouble in Hong Kong?
    2
  10680. During Opium War, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but had nothing of value to offer to the Chinese for it, so they waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to pump the addiction throughout rest of China, and Hong Kong was made into British colony. It was merely the beginning of the Century of Humiliation for China, where Western powers (and Japan) began carving up parts of China's territory (like a pie, as depicted in a French cartoon) and then dividing it up among themselves, while Chinese emperor is hapless to do anything against them.
    2
  10681. Uighurs are getting free education and learning life skills necessary for them in the workplace, so that they don't turn towards terrorism because they can't find a job.
    2
  10682.  @jadedocuocsongcanada9358  During Vietnam War, Americans dropped napalm bombs ('Napalm Girl' had her clothes burnt off and was running naked in the streets) and torched Vietnamese villages to the ground. The Americans sprayed chemical defoliants like Agent Orange which cause birth deformities in Vietnamese children even 40 years after. American soldiers slept with Vietnamese women and impregnated them, before withdrawing from South Vietnam and leaving the women to raise their offspring. Video: How Nick Ut's Photo 'Napalm Girl' Changed The Vietnam War | NBC News youtu.be/2FrVpX-E0kI Video: Vietnam 40 years after: Children of Agent Orange youtu.be/at2AcXii-YQ Link: What Happened to These Children of War? marieclaire.com/politics/news/a498/children-war-1/
    2
  10683.  @jadedocuocsongcanada9358  If China can someday surpass the United States as the premier world superpower in the future, then why can't Chinese strive to achieve this eventual goal? Britain was colonial superpower during 19th century but was eventually overtaken by USA in 20th century. But prior to that, China (and also India) had been economic superpower for 1800 years and we made up 25% of the world's GDP share, according to world leading British economist, Angus Maddison. Source: Global distribution of GDP among China, India, Western Europe, USA, Middle East from 1 AD to 2003 AD wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA_Middle_East.png And judging from the above trend, it looks as though China is all set to dominate the 21st century.
    2
  10684.  @RedHanded1969  You said: "You conveniently ignore that communists killed millions of Chinese in civil war to rise to power in 1949." It was Chinese Civil War, of course Chinese were killing Chinese. Just like during American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans. Or Vietnamese killing Vietnamese during Vietnam War. Or Koreans during Korean War or any civil war for that matter. But why the biased double standards when Chinese kill Chinese during Chinese Civil War? Which Civil War in the world has no one killing each other?
    2
  10685.  @RedHanded1969  You can talk about Great Chinese Famine and the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution in China, these topics are taught in Chinese history textbooks. Just go to Baidu.com (Chinese Wikipedia) and there are webpage covering these topics. Source: Baidu: Great Chinese Famine baike.baidu.com/item/%E4%B8%89%E5%B9%B4%E5%9B%B0%E9%9A%BE%E6%97%B6%E6%9C%9F/10317322?fromtitle=%E4%B8%89%E5%B9%B4%E8%87%AA%E7%84%B6%E7%81%BE%E5%AE%B3&fromid=603238 Source: Baidu: Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution baike.baidu.com/item/%E6%96%87%E5%8C%96%E5%A4%A7%E9%9D%A9%E5%91%BD
    2
  10686.  @RedHanded1969  So why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage; they were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were lousy, and they had far fewer numbers (only 50 communist members in 1921) over the Kuomintang. The KMT on the other hand, had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training, and far superior numbers over the the communists. Securing victory against the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT. Yet the communists survived all KMT attempts to wipe them out, employing strategies like "Long March" (长征) and despite KMT's initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan). This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland.
    2
  10687.  @RedHanded1969  Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in expelling foreign imperialism from our lands and reunifying our divided country where the previous KMT administration failed under Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. When Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established ROC, China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the PRC in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    2
  10688.  @RedHanded1969  Let's look at data and economic statistics. About poverty in China, According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    2
  10689.  @RedHanded1969  "神州 Shenzhou You are lying by changing the wording use.. Wikipedia uses EXTREME POVERTY eradication about China which is US$2/day ($60/mth).. No developed country use those stats, only very poor country." Because China is NOT a developed country so why should China use those stats? US$2/day is because the cost of living in China is (generally) lower than that of the USA and other developed countries. China has lifted 700 million people out of poverty by international standards in just 40 years, whereas the whole rest of the world only lifted 150 million by comparison. Video: Historical achievement: Take 700 million out of poverty youtu.be/CljWffPgmG8 "China has lifted 728 million people out of poverty by international standards. The whole rest of the world has only lifted 152 million." - John Ross, Well-known columnist in UK, Former Deputy mayor of London.
    2
  10690.  @RedHanded1969  You said: "Taiwan n Korea had done it long before China." Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: White Terror (Taiwan) wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Terror_(Taiwan) But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Source: Taiwan Miracle wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_Miracle Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Today, Taiwan's economy is stagnant, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising, and Taiwan graduates are seeking employment abroad, such as in mainland China or Singapore. Since Taiwan thrived under authoritarian single-party KMT rule then why switch to democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    2
  10691.  @RedHanded1969  Let's look at some more statistics. For the first time, there are more rich Chinese than Americans in the top 10%. Source: There are more wealthy Chinese than Americans for the first time edition.cnn.com/2019/10/21/investing/china-wealth-americans/index.html A new report from Credit Suisse (CS) shows that wealth in China is ticking up, and the country now accounts for 100 million of the richest 10% of people in the world. There are 99 million Americans in the same category. Yet your logic is that 50% of Chinese still in poverty? How did you ever arrive at your calculations?
    2
  10692.  @RedHanded1969  Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong can't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he'll wish for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. About the One Child Policy, in the past China was still dirt-poor country, suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems at that time. Why allow families in China to raise multiple kids, only for them to starve to death, succumb to childhood diseases, and having not enough food, not enough hospitals, and not enough schools to send them all to? Why not make families focus all available resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood, and get him into a good school? According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china Look at India, world's 2nd largest population country, and India is suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems that China once suffered from in the past. So China's One Child Policy actually worked, that's how the CPC managed to lift our people out of poverty. Whereas India did not have population control measures, and they are suffering from overpopulation today.
    2
  10693.  @RedHanded1969  Dr Sun is the father of modern China, but Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳. What's wrong with the Soviet Union giving China our flag 🇨🇳? You're just being biased against China that's all. Mao Zedong reunified China where the KMT failed during Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years, what are you talking about? Even Tibet was finally returned to the mainland in 1952, yet you're denying that Mao reunified our divided country? If not for Mao Zedong, China would be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, while the Westerners laugh at China. Previously under ROC, China was dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today under the PRC, China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    2
  10694.  @vietnguyen4312  "The CCP is the issue not the hard working Chinese people." The Communist Party of China is literally consist of hard working Chinese people. If not for the CPC, China today would most likely still be a war-torn, dirt-poor, starving country in the past, instead of the strong, unified country we are today under the communist party. Why then would you advocate for regime change? No other political party has performed such wonders for improving China's situation as the communist party, which other party can replace the CPC?
    2
  10695.  @vietnguyen4312  You said the people in Taiwan have higher living standards, but why are they still using paper currency for their transactions? In mainland China, virtually all payments are made through mobile payment app.
    2
  10696.  @yxmichaelxyyxmichaelxy3074  We are talking about different types of tariffs. Exporters pay an export tariff (which are very rare), paid to the host country. As far as I know, China doesn't have an export tariff, so goods can leave China with no issues. In the rare scenario where there is export tariff, then it's true that exporters have to pay the tariff. However, the tariffs by President Trump are import tariffs, born by the importers who then pass the cost on to the consumers themselves.
    2
  10697. China wants partners. The US? They want puppets.
    2
  10698.  @shobhitgupta8406  Which country is China currently at war with? When was the declaration of war?
    2
  10699.  Moonland Almond  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China has nearly quadrupled from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    2
  10700.  @currentchannel3452  David Fincher’s 1999 movie《Fight Club》is based on Chuck Palahniuk's 1996 novel of the same name. China’s ending is actually closer to Palahniuk’s original vision for the ending of “Fight Club,” as written in his 1996 book. The book's author even confirms this in an interview. As Palahniuk told TMZ while reacting to China’s censorship, “The irony is that the way the Chinese have changed it is they’ve aligned the ending almost exactly with the ending of the book, as opposed to Fincher’s ending, which was the more spectacular visual ending. So in a way, the Chinese brought the movie back to the book a little bit.” Palahniuk also said it was interesting that suddenly everyone cared about a censored “Fight Club” ending when he’s spent nearly his entire career fighting censorship and bans when it comes to his books. “My books are heavily banned throughout the U.S.,” Palahniuk said. “The Texas prison system refuses to carry my books in their libraries. A lot of public schools and most private schools refuse to carry my books. But it’s only an issue once China changes the end of a movie? I’ve been putting up with book banning for a long time.”
    2
  10701. He's been impeached twice, sentenced to 40+ counts of felony and now even an attempt on his life. What else are they going to throw at him next?
    2
  10702. Yes, its grammatical mistake. Poverty itself is not "elevated" but "alleviated".
    2
  10703. Zaki Adam But can India afford wage war on multiple fronts? War is expensive to finance and fighting on two fronts costs twice as much. India going to war with China over territory Indian government themselves do not claim, is going to be costly affair.
    2
  10704. +Pritam Rakshit Bhutanese government has not even shown proof that the territory belongs to Bhutan at all. Also, it should be noted that China is India's biggest trading partner, while India isn't within top 10 trading partners of China. Sources: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_trading_partners_of_India en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_trading_partners_of_China
    2
  10705. Pritam Rakshit If it is disputed territory between China and Bhutan, then what's Indian troops doing there at all? It should be bilateral affair between China and Bhutan, so why Indian send its troops to territory that is not even their own? India and Bhutan have treaty, but doesn't give Bhutan right to use Indian army in its own territorial claims.
    2
  10706.  @DiogoJ1  Many Chinese tend to have a better understanding of the West, than many Westerners do about China.
    2
  10707.  @jaxstax2406  In other words, YouTube does allow censorship of comments according to a channel's preferences. Therefore YouTube does censor comments.
    2
  10708. Tiangong-1 was launched in 2011, and originally predicted for 2 year operational lifespan. But its already 2018, so the reentry is long overdue that's all. America's Skylab spacestation made news headlines during its reentry back in 1979, so this is the merely the natural conclusion to spacestations at the end of their lifespan.
    2
  10709.  @zackk4393  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"? Video: Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' youtu.be/DPt-zXn05ac
    2
  10710. No matter what Carrie Lam does, the Hong Kong protestors won't stop. Carrie Lam has formally withdrawn the Hong Kong extradition bill, yet the HK protests continue. Carrie Lam has stated that she's open to dialogue, but the protestors aren't, and they refuse to talk. Therefore, more authoritarian measures are eventually needed by Hong Kong government.
    2
  10711.  @cherylderue336  The People's Armed Police (中国人民武装警察部队) is estimated to have a total strength of 1.5 million, so where do you get your figure of 4.3 million? Furthermore, how does the Labour Law of the People's Republic of China (中华人民共和国劳动法) apply to African countries? Chinese labor law does not apply to African labor laws, so what are you talking about?
    2
  10712.  @MrBlinder514  Who would think like what? That China wasn't communist during the Ming Dynasty?
    2
  10713. Exactly. The truth is that Navalny died of a blood clot, and that before his death, Navalny was supposed to be released in a prisoner exchange deal.
    2
  10714.  @UltraGamer9999999999  I just shown you that Japanese seafood market deal with live Alaskan King Crab, live Octopus, live Squid, so what's the difference? Did you know that according to Scientific American, no coronavirus has ever been found in aquatic animals so whats wrong with descaling fish and gutting the fish? Would you rather you descale and gut the fish yourself? Video: According to Scientific American, no one has ever reported finding coronavirus in aquatic animals youtu.be/8a8avCFbON4?t=343
    2
  10715.  @UltraGamer9999999999  What's wrong with citing Nathan Rich quoting Scientific American that no one has ever reported coronavirus infections in *aquatic animals*? The article you cite shows that fish have bacteria (duh!) so you don't want to eat fish then? Bacteria is found on land animals, uncooked meat, frozen meat, etc, so yo don't want to eat any meat at all? Look at Japanese eating raw fish (sashimi) and live octopus tentacles and its uncooked food that contains bacteria isn't it? The Japanese even eat poisonous puffer fish (fugu) yet you think Chinese seafood is bad?
    2
  10716.  @UltraGamer9999999999  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    2
  10717.  @UltraGamer9999999999  Please explain how to degut a fish without spraying blood everywhere, you tell me? Bacteria are everywhere on Earth, even your raw uncooked meat has bacteria and so does frozen food. Even Japanese eat raw uncooked fish, live octopus tentacles and they even eat raw egg on beef rice (gyudon) yet you still think Chinese cooking fish is unhygienic? Nathan Rich merely quoted Scientific American, here's the actual quote. No one has ever reported finding a coronavirus infecting aquatic animals scientificamerican.com/article/snakes-could-be-the-original-source-of-the-new-coronavirus-outbreak-in-china/
    2
  10718. Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."
    2
  10719.  @everythingandmore5537  Apart from the Communist Party of China 中国共产党（中共）there are 8 other recognised political parties in China that political candidates can opt to join and they are: -China Zhi Gong Party (CZGP) 中国致公党（致公党） -Chinese Peasants' and Workers' Democratic Party (CPWDP) 中国农工民主党（农工党） -China Democratic League (CDL) 中国民主同盟（民盟） -Jiusan Society (JS) 九三学社 -China National Democratic Construction Association (CNDCA) 中国民主建国会（民建） -China Association for Promoting Democracy (CAPD) 中国民主促进会（民进） -Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League (TDSGL) 台湾民主自治同盟（台盟） -Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang (RCCK) 中国国民党革命委员会（民革） …… Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_China#Parties
    2
  10720.  @PepeCoinMania  "The withdrawal of Russian forces from the Kyiv region is a gesture of goodwill to create favourable conditions for Russia-Ukraine talks." said Kremlin spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov.
    2
  10721.  @mikitadou  Do you label others as bots just because we take a different view from yours?
    2
  10722.  @Colin22  Kremlin spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov said: "The withdrawal of Russian forces from the Kyiv region is a gesture of goodwill to create favourable conditions for Russia-Ukraine talks."
    2
  10723. The port still requires some human personnel to perform repairs and maintenance on those machines. As for "creativity", music, song and dance and the arts are thus far, still beyond a machine's learning capability.
    2
  10724. Whether or not Abe was killed because of his opposition towards sanctions on Russia and support of Ukraine, it's a fact that Western MSM are trying to frame China as somehow behind the assassination.
    2
  10725. Hollywood, Wall Street, CIA, the Military Industrial Complex, they're all working together to manufacture American war propaganda.
    2
  10726. China is 3rd country in world to send people into space, besides USA and Russia, during the Shenzhou missions. In 2013, China landed our very own lunar rover and spacecraft, Chang'E-3, making it the first soft landing on the Moon after nearly 40 years of neglect by NASA. The Chinese government hopes to one day put a man on the Moon like USA, as well as to be the first to land on the dark side of the Moon.
    2
  10727.  @aerojetrocketdyners-2538  China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/b8cCsUBYSkw This makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity, some 856.4 billion kilowatt hours a year – more than double the amount produced by Brazil, in second place. The top three is completed by Canada, which produces 376.7 billion kilowatt hours a year. Source: China produces the most electricity from hydroelectric power weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/
    2
  10728.  @hageneesje  Wet markets provide fresh food to people at affordable prices, why should China close down our wet markets? Many countries around the world have wet markets too, so what's your point then?
    2
  10729. What doesn't kill you, only makes you stronger. NASA banned China from the International Space Station, so China launch our own space station. It's only a matter of time for the same thing to happen in microchips.
    2
  10730.  @drsahmed1  "神州 Shenzhou Shut Up" You can't refute my points so you decide to shut me up?
    2
  10731. In a poll of nearly 7500 readers by the United Daily News website, 61 percent said the trip was “not welcome” as it “may destabilise the Taiwan Strait”. Only 38 percent welcomed the visit and said it had “more advantages than disadvantages”.
    2
  10732. Biden might lose to Trump in this year's election. Can you imagine how much more powerful Trump is?
    2
  10733.  Moonland Almond  Even Taiwan's own constitution says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, nor any formal declaration of independence, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    2
  10734. Yes, yes actually the whole video is all CGI effects. So realistic!
    2
  10735.  @MarkYeung1  Russia's victory over Ukraine is inevitable, because the US has now shifted its attention away from Ukraine and towards Israel. US is now involved in supporting Israel, meaning it has no more time to do the same for Ukraine. Without military aid from the US, the Ukraine stands no chance of winning. Also how is it a stalemate when Russia has control over those oblasts?
    2
  10736.  @MarkYeung1  "what if Ukraine won't sign, and proceed to recover the areas?" Then Ukraine will only continue to lose more ground. Did you know that this year, Ukraine's ground offensive actually resulted in Russia gaining more territory? Yet you think Ukraine can proceed to recover those areas?
    2
  10737.  @MarkYeung1  According to NYT, since Jan 1, Ukraine has gained 143 square miles. But Russia has gained 331 square miles, so overall, Russia has a net gain of 188 square miles. So Ukraine's ground offensive actually resulted in Russia gaining more territory than Ukraine.
    2
  10738.  @MarkYeung1  The Institute for the Study of War has been described as "a hawkish Washington group" favoring an "aggressive foreign policy". Writers for Business Day, The Nation and Foreign Policy have called ISW "neoconservative". Also, the fact remains that Russia is in control of about a fifth of Ukraine's territory, including Crimea and the oblasts mentioned earlier.
    2
  10739.  @MarkYeung1  Russia's victory is clearly inevitable. The US is turning its attention away from Ukraine and is focusing on Israel-Palestine, so how will Ukraine continue to receive support? Israel will need ammunition, shells and missiles, so how will US continue to supply Ukraine?
    2
  10740.  @MarkYeung1  According to The Telegraph: Ukraine's army is running out of men to recruit and time to win. Victory may be in sight for Vladimir Putin. The war in Ukraine is one of attrition, fought on terms that increasingly favor Moscow. Kiev has dealt admirably with shortages of Western equipment so far but a shortage of manpower which it is already having to confront my prove fatal.
    2
  10741.  @MarkYeung1  According to Business Insider: Ukraine official says it can't properly use its Western kit because it has so few soldiers left, report says. Ukraine's army is in dire need of manpower, an aide to its president told Time magazine. The lack of soldiers means Ukraine isn't able to make proper use of Western-provided gear, he said. As well as suffering casualties, many Ukrainian men are trying to escape enlistment.
    2
  10742. When it comes to competition, China's response is to self-improve. The US's response is to ban the competition.
    2
  10743. Indians cite their allies as supporting them, but never really think about what India has to offer, to make their allies willing go to war with China for India's sake.
    2
  10744. +Pranav Abbott Russia is anti-USA, so why would Russia join the same side as USA and fight against China, its only dependable anti-US ally? You Indians are just dreaming of the best-case scenario for India that's all, because that's the only chance India's ever going to get. But if you look at real politics, such as how China is USA and Russia's biggest trading partner, then why would these countries break off economic ties with China, for India's sake?
    2
  10745. +Pranav Abbott China is both USA and Russia's biggest trade partners, so why would USA and Russia even want to sacrifice their own economic relations with China, for India's sake? President Trump has repeatedly stated in his public addresses that "China's cooperation is essential to containing the missile crisis on Korean peninsula". So why would USA want to jeopardise US-China relations for India? Because it is democracy? What has India to offer to USA?
    2
  10746. +Basu Vivek That's exactly the point I am trying to make about India and US. US and India are in no way allies, but many Indians seem to believe US is on their side. Russia also helps India in any activity that opposes the USA too, so in war, it is unlikely for Russia and USA to work together with India against China. People need to see the war from perspective of these countries, instead of just claiming they will help unconditionally. Thankfully, no bullet is fired between India and China border. But our countries came close to doing so, during Doklam standoff. Doklam is actually located on China-Bhutan border, so why did Indian troops trespass into Chinese territory to oppose PLA road construction then? India does not claim Doklam as part of its territory. 1. Chinese supplies pass through Strait of Malacca yes, but Chinese goods also reach the West through this channel. USA, Canada, UK and Europe may not take kindly to Strait of Malacca being blockaded by Indian Navy and them being unable to receive their Chinese goods as a result. Also, China is building economic corridor through Pakistan to Gwadar port, which would bypass the need to travel by Strait of Malacca. 2. In mountain warfare, China has light tanks suitable for mountainous terrain. China tested its homegrown light tank, Xinqingtan, whereas India's Arjun tank, which is too heavy for the mountainous regions. PLA tested these tanks during live-fire exercise in Tibet during the Doklam standoff, which was probably when India realised it lacked suitable tanks for mountainous warfare. Source: defensenews(dot)com/land/2017/09/05/indian-army-shows-interest-in-light-tanks-for-defense-along-chinese-border/ 3. India has supersonic cruise missile Brahmos, but China has hypersonic cruise missile, DF-ZF, already tested seven times successfully. 4. India's Agni 4 and Agni 5 have ranges of over 5,000 km but China has DongFeng-41 with operational range between 12,000 km to 15,000 km making it the world's longest range missile, surpassing the range of the US LGM-30 Minuteman which has a reported range of 13,000 km. China has soft power in the form of economic influence, building various infrastructure in other countries like Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and even in Africa, like Nigeria, Angola, Kenya, etc. China has one of the worlds largest movie markets, and many Hollywood directors modified their movies to cater to Chinese audiences (such as Transformers , Iron Man 3 etc)
    2
  10747.  @yslee1401  Of course! Putting Meng under house arrest protects her from the CPC's clutches! It all makes perfect sense now! Canada is playing the hero and actually protecting Meng, who'd thought up such a conspiracy theory?
    2
  10748. China has express support for a Russia-led UN resolution calling for a cease-fire. the immediate release of all hostages and to allow humanitarian aid to enter Gaza.
    2
  10749.  @alexg6353  Which Canadian citizens has China kidnapped? Robert Lloyd Schellenberg was sentenced to death for attempting to smuggle 222kg of methamphetamines. Michael Spavor took photos and videos of Chinese military equipment on multiple occasions. These photos were subsequently sent illegally to various people outside of China, including Kovrig. Between 2017 and 2018, Kovrig entered China under the guise of a businessman and false pretext of commerce. Using this false identity, Kovrig gathered a large amount of information related to China’s national security, and wrote analytical reports to be sent to the International Crisis Group, (ICG). Contrary to popular belief, the ICG is not authorized to work in China as a legitimate NGO.
    2
  10750. Its a preconceived notion that democracy is the best form of governance. Look at ROC, South Korea and Singapore for example. ROC has been ruled by authoritarian single-party Kuomingtang (Nationalist) for almost its entire life, and KMT was successful in developing Taiwan to what it is today. Only in 2016, did another party like DPP took over KMT. Would Taiwan be where it is today if not for KMT? South Korea had the dictator Park Chung Hee, who led a period of rapid economic growth in South Korea, until 1979, and despite his controversial dictatorship, Park has been ranked by the public as the greatest South Korean president for his contributions. Would South Korea be where it is today if not for Park? Singapore has been ruled by single-party authoritarian party (PAP) for its entire life, for over 50 years since its founding as a nation. The first PM of Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew, ruled with an iron fist, but managed to turn the country from small fishing village into 1st world economy. Would Singapore be where it is today if not for PAP and Lee Kuan Yew? The success of these countries could be attributed to the fact that single party authoritarian governments can make long-term plans, not short term plans. For example, Chinese government has been ruled by communist party for over 60 years, and they can make long-term 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, to map out China's future in 2020, 2030, 2050, etc. Democratic parties have limits (like USA having 4-8 years term limit) so at the most they can only make short term plans, because there's no guarantee that they will be in power after their term is over.
    2
  10751. What exactly is China doing to protestors and anyone who isn't an Ethnic Han Chinese? Ethnic minorities in China like Tibetans, Uighurs, aren't subject to the 1-Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Ethnic minorities also enjoy several privileges over Han, such as tax exemptions, free education for up to 15 years, priority in healthcare, special bursaries and education admission advantages. For example, if applying for university course, if a Han candidate needs say 500 points to qualify, then ethnic minority only needs 300 points (easier to qualify) for the exact same course.
    2
  10752.  @leepalmer9558  What sterilisation of Uighurs? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    2
  10753.  @leepalmer9558  What concentration camps? Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth, and they are learn Mandarin Chinese (the national language of China) at school, Chinese history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American citizens by birth and they learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America. Have you actually been to Xinjiang and see what life is like there for yourself?
    2
  10754.  @leepalmer9558  The population of Uighurs in China actually increased from 10 million in 2010 to 12.8 million in 2018, so what concentration camps are you talking about? What examples of first hand accounts are you talking about? People have visited Xinjiang, just take British-Australian Jerry Grey, who has traveled to Xinjiang five times and bicycled across several provinces of China and he did not see any concentration camps, so what are you talking about?
    2
  10755.  @yslee1401  The BBC can't report anything without getting approval from the British government. BBC is funded principally by an annual television license fee charged to all British households. This fee is set by the British Government and agreed by Parliament. So if you're claiming CGTN is state-sponsored, then the same can be said of the BBC, because their government controls the purse-strings.
    2
  10756.  @slappyfun  I'm glad you decided to take an open-minded approach to serpentza's and Cyrus' channels. I would like to point out that serpentza (and his buddy laowhy86) have a history of lying to their audiences, like for example, they made the claim that the DUNE movie posters in China excluded black actress Sharon-Duncan Brewster. However, this has since been debunked, and DUNE movie posters in China do feature Sharon in them.
    2
  10757. Americans also stole German technology. At the start of WWII, American tanks were largely inferior to German tanks, but after Nazi surrender, Americans absorbed Nazi Panzer (Tank) technology and that's why their tanks are so powerful today. Even Nazi V2 Rocket Scientists were put to work on the NASA Moon missions. Source: One of the greatest ripoffs of all time was the US theft of German patents after WWII wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/patents.html
    2
  10758. Indeed. Furthermore, Brian's references are mostly from Western sources, such as accessing NED's website to see what color-revolutions they are funding all over the world.
    2
  10759.  @dawei666  So Meng is not on trial even after 2 years after her arrest on 2018? What have the Canadian authorities been doing all this while? This is akin to the kidnapping for 2 years and counting.
    2
  10760.  @jjstudios9766  The US also stole German technology after WWII. At the start of WWII, American tanks were largely inferior to German tanks, but after Nazi WWII surrender, Americans absorbed German Panzer (Tank) technology and that's why American tanks are so powerful today. The German Airforce (Luftwaffe) had such successful aircraft designs that the Americans incorporated those designs into their aircraft. Even Nazi V2 Rocket Scientists were put to work by NASA on Moon landing missions. Source: One of the greatest ripoffs of all time was the US theft of German patents after WWII wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/patents.html
    2
  10761.  @jjstudios9766  "If China stops exporting, and the US begins to buy from other countries," If US stops importing, then China begins to sell to other countries. Same tactic. Regarding critical components, China too has domination over rare earths and China accounts for over 95% of the world’s production of rare earths.. Rare earths are important for green technology like electric motors of hybrid vehicles, wind turbines, hard disc drives, portable electronics, microphones, speakers, petroleum refining, diesel additives, alloy making, fuel cells production, electronics, LCD and plasma screens, fiber optics, lasers, medical imaging, and so on. China having 95% control over this rare earth production puts China in a powerful position for negotiation.
    2
  10762.  @stunningandbrave2520  You said: "And they are free to travel in international waters even if you don't like it." How is the Taiwan Straits considered international waters? Even the South China Seas is not considered international waters according to Maps of the High Seas, so how does your argument hold water?
    2
  10763.  @stunningandbrave2520  Look up Wikipedia: International Waters, and the Taiwan Strait is NOT International Waters and neither is the South China Sea, so how is the US travelling in international waters?
    2
  10764.  @syedputra5955  Ask the Tibetans? The Tibet Autonomous Region is arguably the most developed region in the Himalayas compared to its neighbors like Nepal and Bhutan, having better paved roads, electric lines, gas pipes, water plumbing, telecommunications, Internet access, even access to 5G network.
    2
  10765.  @rs7458  True communism is only achieved when everyone is treated equally (including race) then why should China stop being communistic? As for Russian actors, in the Chinese sci-fi movie The Wandering Earth 《流浪地球》the character played by Wu Jing has a Russian colleague in the spaceship, and they communicate with each other using advanced translation earpieces.
    2
  10766. dxelson Why are you accusing me of being 50 cent troll? Where did I ever mentioned the Communist Party of China here at all?
    2
  10767. Russia and China are facilitating the global transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world, dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and its "allies".)
    2
  10768.  @perrychrispy1  About Social Credit System, many foreigners often complain about how Chinese people are rude, spit in public, smoke in non-smoking areas, jump queues, jaywalk, disobey traffic rules, drive past red lights, and all manner of unsavory behavior, when not all Chinese people are like that. We also feel ashamed that such bad Chinese people represent China overseas, so the government came up with Social Credit System to penalize bad behavior and promote good behaviors. But if they persist with bad behavior until their scores become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets, to fly out of China and make nuisance of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again. This is China's form of meritocracy, where bad deeds are penalised and good deeds are rewarded.
    2
  10769.  @perrychrispy1  Orwell is just a writer, and he wrote 1984 as a work of fiction, and purposely exaggerated the negative scenario for entertainment purposes. But it does not necessarily mean that reality will follow according to it. And yes, you do lose points for drinking and smoking too much and the key word here is "too much". Look at how many people killed in accidents because of drunk driving? Or how much lung cancer because of smoking. And throughout ancient history, political power has always been concentrated not in the hands of many, but instead, into the hands of the few elites, be they nobles (aristocracy) or priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy). Such systems were popular in ancient world, because they were stable and simply because they worked. The elites were often well-educated and could make political decisions regarding the country's future, while the ignorant, uneducated masses were kept well away from politics. Democracy on the other hand, has long history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, and even Republic of Rome eventually fell. These proto-democracies weren't successful, and democracy was never popular outside of Greece in ancient times. And today's modern Western democracy only has a history of 100-200 years, so it does not necessarily mean it will be successful in the future.
    2
  10770.  @perrychrispy1  Actually it's Shenzhen (not Schenzen) and it is China's version of Silicon Valley, a technological Mecca, where you can find smartphones, computers, gadgets, cameras, electronics, IT, AI, drones, robotics, automation, software and hardware. There's even a Robot Wars competition held in Shenzhen by Chinese company DJI ( world's leading drone-maker ) where Chinese graduates compete to build the best robots to fight in a tournament and the winning term might get approached by DJI for a job offer. Here is video about Shenzhen's Robot Wars Video China's High-Stakes Robot Wars youtube.com/watch?v=qrhvZhPaxQ4
    2
  10771.  @perrychrispy1  1984 was written for entertainment purposes, a work of fiction that exaggerated the perils of technology, in order to appeal to readers. I mean, don't you read the disclaimer of fictitious work at the beginning of such works? History and reality are obviously going to be different than fiction. In democracy, why do you allow ordinary people to participate in political decisions that will affect the country's future? Ordinary people may not necessary know how to vote responsibly (e.g. they fail to turn up to vote) or they may base their votes on emotions, not logic (e.g. British people don't like foreigners, so they voted for Brexit) or they may simply lack the political awareness to make informed decisions regarding the country's future. That's how people like Hilter managed to come to power, by preying on German people's resentment towards the Treaty of Versailles and he promised to make Germany great again (which admittedly he did) And that's how Donald Trump was able to prey on gullible Americans voters' resentment towards China, together with false promises of making America great again. Whereas China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has seen the rise and fall of various nations and survived the violent course of history relatively intact. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) because it works for China, so why does China have to adopt Western democracy then? Because Westerners say so?
    2
  10772.  @perrychrispy1  I disagree with your claim that authoritarian governments stifling innovation and growth. Look at Communist Soviet Union and they made significant advances in nuclear energy, as well as launching the world's first satellite Sputnik-1 and the first person in space was Russian Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin and the first space stations launched was Soviet Salyut-1. This shows that even in authoritarian system, innovation is possible. Even Fascist Germany made significant advances in technology and at the start of WWII, American tanks were largely inferior to German tanks, and the Nazi V2 Rocket Scientists were what led NASA to successfully land on the Moon. Even China has always been authoritarian, yet we produced inventions like the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly changed history. Paper and Printing made the recording and transmission of knowledge much easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. All of these innovation and inventions occurred under authoritarian regimes, so doesn't this imply that there can still be innovation in an authoritarian environment?
    2
  10773.  @perrychrispy1  Besides inventing gunpowder, Chinese also invented handcannons, handgrenades, fragmentation bombs, landmines, naval mines, exploding cannonballs, rocket launchers, multi-launch rocket systems and of course, fireworks. Today, Americans celebrate the 4th of July with Chinese fireworks, and there was even an ancient Chinese flamethrower capable of launching continuous stream of flame (the first of its kind) which must have been a fearsome sight to behold in the ancient battlefield. Video: Ancient Chinese Flamethrower youtube.com/watch?v=goi-FVnTD5Y&t=915
    2
  10774.  @perrychrispy1  As the world's most populous country, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4 times that of USA, China has at least 4 geniuses to every 1 American genius. And this can be proven statistically. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large Populations Have More Geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Taken from the above: Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    2
  10775.  @perrychrispy1  R&D? China is literally pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending and catching up fast to the United States according to Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($451.9 billion) 3. European Union ($379.0 billion) 4. Japan ($165.7 billion) 5. Germany ($118.8 billion) 6. South Korea ($91.6 billion) ... ... 21. Israel ($12.7 billion) China is ranked world's 2nd in R&D spending, while Israel is only ranked 21st.
    2
  10776.  @perrychrispy1  About Startups, China has world's 2nd highest number of startups with a current valuation of US$1 billion or more (also known as "unicorns") according to Source: List of unicorn startup companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unicorn_startup_companies 1. United States (127 unicorns) 2. China (104 unicorns) 3. India (23 unicorns) 4. South Korea (9 unicorns) 5. United Kingdom (8 unicorns) 6. Indonesia (4 unicorns) ... 11. Israel (2 unicorns) The top unicorns are mostly dominated by China and USA: 1. Ant Financial ($150 billion) (Chinese) 2. Bytedance ($78.0 billion) (Chinese) 3. DiDi ($56 billion) (Chinese) 4. WeWork ($45 billion) (American) 5. Airbnb ($38 billion) (American) ...
    2
  10777.  @perrychrispy1  China publishes more scientific and technical journals in physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences, than even the United States. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_scientific_and_technical_journal_articles In 2016: 1. China (426,165 articles) 2. United States (408,985 articles) 3. India (110,320 articles) 4. Germany (103,122 articles) 5. United Kingdom (97,527 articles) 6. Japan (96,536 articles) This implies that every year, more discoveries are being made and published in Chinese-language papers than English-language papers, and Chinese researchers have access to Western research papers, but Chinese research papers might prove difficult for Western researchers due to the language barrier.
    2
  10778.  @perrychrispy1  China produces more STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) graduates than any other country in the world. Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/02/02/the-countries-with-the-most-stem-graduates-infographic/ 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000)
    2
  10779. Apart from Russia, China has successfully tested a cutting-edge hypersonic aircraft, the Xingkong-2 (星空-2 "Starry Sky-2") launched using a rocket. The aircraft rides shockwaves generated by it's hypersonic flight and maintained speeds above Mach 5.5 (or 5.5 times the speed of sound) for more than 400 seconds, attaining a top speed of 7,344 kmph. Experts say the aircraft's speed and unpredictable trajectory will challenge modern missile defense systems. Video: Military news: China tests hypersonic aircraft Starry Sky-2 youtu.be/aVWQ2uOCepU
    2
  10780. It's clear that no matter what Carrie Lam does, the Hong Kong protestors will not be satisfied. Lam has formally withdrawn the HK extradition bill, yet the Hong Kong protests continue. Lam has announced that she is open to dialogue but the protestors aren't, and they refuse to talk. So Hong Kong government needs to resort to more authoritarian measures now.
    2
  10781.  @edz6013  Yes, since the 19th century, many have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom. But it's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising and the trajectories don't appear to be changing anytime soon.
    2
  10782. King Boo The government is not perfect, but at least China is currently not at war with any country since our last major war in 1979, and is peacefully building infrastructure in less developed countries like Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Maldives, etc. But USA is involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan war, etc, even in 21st century and is cutting off those countries heads (Muammar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, etc) and installing their own US puppet governments in place. They're probably planning to do the same thing to Assad soon.
    2
  10783. forbidmyname Then how do you explain the fact that China is the most popular country in Asia for international students as of 2013, surpassing even Japan and South Korea in number of international students? China has a large student population and competition for top schools and higher education in China is fierce and intense, and many Chinese students struggle to pass the local entrance exams (Gaokao 高考) That's why some Chinese students choose to study abroad in other countries instead.
    2
  10784.  @MarkYeung1  "Seems like China is looking for a fight?" Seems like you don't even know Chinese history, and just assume China is belligerent that's all. And it appears that you take the side of India, even though India is a BRICS member who continues trading with Russia (i.e India is buying Russian oil priced in Rupees/Ruble)
    2
  10785.  @MarkYeung1  "China has trades with Russia numbers hundreds of billions of dollars each year to fuel Russia's war machines." China trades peacefully with Russia and China does not supply Russia with military equipment, so how's that supporting war? Even India (world's largest democracy) continues to trade with Russia and neither does India vote to condemn Russia's special military operation, yet you're only singling out China?
    2
  10786. ​ @marioreissmann7457  The Belt and Road Initiative is an example of a long term plan by China that would take several decades to fully realize. Of course, conditions can change every few years, that's why China has the National Party Congress (currently the 20th session) to reevaluate the previous 5 years plans, while preparing for the next 5-year plan. But the overall 20-year plan remains constant. Why is making a 20 year plan not a good reason for extending the number of presidential terms? When leaders change, the long-term policies may change as well. For example, Obama had signed U.S on to the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) but after Trump came to power, he withdrew the U.S from the TPP. You asked: "Why do you ask where I see America in some decades?" Can't I do that? You don't have to live in America to predict where America is going. The fact remains that America has no plan for the long-term future.
    2
  10787.  @matthewmorgan7106  So why do foreign companies flock to China time and time again to do business here, if the terms aren't as favourable as you made them out to be? And nobody point a gun at foreign companies and force them to set up shop here in China, they do so of their own accord. However, if a company wants to set up shop here in China, then they are expected to obey Chinese laws while in China. Ultimately, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, whereas in USA for example, the U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit, waging wars in the Middle East to control the oil for example.
    2
  10788. The bat soup coronavirus origins myth have long been debunked by experts. Source: Bat soup in China? This video of a bat in broth was filmed in the Pacific. observers.france24.com/en/20200204-china-debunked-coronavirus-wuhan-bat-broth-pacific-bat-soup Videos showing Asian people eating bat soup are circulating widely on social networks, with captions suggesting that eating bats is a possible source of the Chinese coronavirus outbreak. Most of the videos were filmed thousands of kilometers from China, and have no documented link to the outbreak of the virus.
    2
  10789. Americans should be upset that their tax dollars are being used to fund these tribunals that aren't legally binding nor serve any purpose, except to serve the MIC.
    2
  10790.  @Pachochay8045  Well, at least that shows he's not being paid by any government to promote his message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls"
    2
  10791. Well, Narendra Modi is the democratic elected government of India after all, so the Indians only have themselves to blame.
    2
  10792. Sherlock: "Elementary, my dear Watson." Watson: "No S**t Sherlock!"
    2
  10793. China spent 13 years, but managed to churn out an aircraft carrier to show for our efforts. What about in the video (at 0:22 ) where USA spent over 12 years developing the railgun, but it may never leave the testing facility at the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Virginia? Which of these two countries has atrophied here?
    2
  10794. theylied1776 Westerners had aircraft carrier technology since WW2, whereas China had none before, but managed to compress generations of aircraft carrier technology into span of few years to catch up with the West and produce our first aircraft carrier.
    2
  10795. No known tests for Brahmos II have been conducted yet, but China's hypersonic DF-ZF is has been tested at least 7 times, and US CIA has made reports that it could possibly bypass US defenses, including THAAD.
    2
  10796. Zeno1999 Mao Zedong proposed 20 KM demilitarized zone for both China and India at our disputed borders, and even withdrew PLA troops from the border. But Indian PM Nehru saw this opportunity to occupy land that PLA had vacated, and sent Indian troops into the regions. Nehru refused to sit down to negotiations, and pursued an aggressive "Forward Policy" of building military bases at our disputed borders, even exceeding the international boundary and into Chinese territory. Zhou Enlai proposed Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence 和平共处五项原则 to define China-India relations and tried many times to settle our border dispute with India. Zhou Enlai even visited New Delhi 4 times, but Nehru only visited Beijing once.
    2
  10797.  @auroragb  Did I ever mention anything about Taiwan here in this thread? Taiwan is part of China correct, so what seems to be the problem?
    2
  10798.  @auroragb  Who is the one with poor reading comprehension skills? I clearly asked when did I ever mention Taiwan here in this thread, and you quoted the OP? You were the one who suddenly mentioned that I believed Taiwan was part of China (which it is) when I never mentioned Taiwan at all. You can't even answer this simple question of mine.
    2
  10799.  @auroragb  There was clearly NO time limit to granting universal suffrage to Hong Kong, so who are you to impose your own condition to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45? Where in the article does it says universal suffrage should be granted within 22 years? Who are you to determine what an imaginary time limit should be, when there is none stated in the article? Yet you have the gall to label CCP as lying when no such time limit exists? Hong Kong had been under authoritian British colonial rule from 1841 to 1997, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in Hong Kong elections. So isn't it thanks to China that Hong Kong finally has democracy, when it didn't under authoritian British colonial rule?
    2
  10800.  @auroragb  I never did said it was illegal to talk about Taiwan, all I asked was "Did I ever said anything about Taiwan here in this thread?" It's because you suddenly said that I "believe Taiwan is part of China" and if we both agree that it is, then what seems to be the problem here? Who is the one with poor reading comprehension skills here?
    2
  10801.  @auroragb  Once again, there is NO time limit to granting universal suffrage to Hong Kong on Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45, so why do you impose your own time limit and then label CCP renegading on the promise? Where does it says that Beijing is under a time limit as the one imposed by you? Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy while it was British colony and only during the handover period to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't this already an improvement of sorts for Hong Kong?
    2
  10802.  @auroragb  Because you are quoting actual laws like Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45, and no where in the article does it mention a time limit for universal suffrage. So why are you inserting your own "time limit" into Hong Kong Basic Laws? Who do you think you are to amend Hong Kong's laws to include some imaginary time limit, and then start blaming the CCP for not holding up to it?
    2
  10803.  @auroragb   Because there clearly is no time limit to that article, so why are you inserting your own time limit to Hong Kong Basic Law and then claiming that CCP lied? If they wanted a time limit then they would have included one during the passing of the law, yet they choose not to. So why label CCP as renegading on an imaginary time limit? And Singapore has a stifling political environment, lacking basic rights to freedom of expression and assembly, with an authoritarian single-party PAP rule for over 50 years so that's why Singapore transformed from sleepy fishing village nation to modern city. You are most likely from Singapore yourself, yet you can't see how Singapore has progressed under authoritarian rule? Just like Hong Kong did under authoritarian British colonial rule and the mainland did under authoritarian CCP rule?
    2
  10804.  @auroragb  Look at Beijing and it's home to heritage sites like The Great Wall, Summer Palace, Forbidden City, Temple of Heaven, as well as modern buildings like CCTV Headquarters, National Centre for Performing Arts, Galaxy SOHO, in this beautiful 4 min video: A Glance at Beijing youtube.com/watch?v=-UuJxmU6OCQ It shows Chinese mainland cities are prospering under authoritarian CCP rule, so what's wrong with China's political system then? Not every country needs to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    2
  10805.  @auroragb  I have thoroughly refuted your point regarding Article 45 of Hong Kong Basic Law, since there is no time limit involved so the CCP is not renegading on anything. You failed to show how CCP lied when Article 45 has not been violated in any way by CCP, and you are only inserting your own time limit here that's all, because you have nothing else to say. And I have talked a lot about Singapore authoritarian single-party PAP rule and how its freedom of expression and assembly is stifling, yet you just dismiss them as "baseless" without proof of your own? In Singapore the government can arrest people who gather in groups of 5 or more as "illegal assembly" and land such people behind bars, so again, how are my points baseless?
    2
  10806.  @auroragb  Because like I said, you failed to show how CCP violated Article 45 at all, because there is no time limit to universal suffrage. You clearly can't refute this point and all you are doing is inserting your own imaginary time limit to Article 45 where there is none. So why should your "imaginary time table" be followed you tell me? You are merely imposing your own time table and then calling CCP a liar for not following it. You said "Similar laws exist in most democracies (all i can think of, but I do not claim to be all knowing)." then which other democracies have such a law? And it was Human Rights Watch that claimed Singapore's political environment is stifling, here is the article again in case you missed it the first time Human Rights Watch: Singapore (Source: hrw.org/asia/singapore ) Singapore’s political environment is stifling. Citizens face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. In 2017, the country tightened the already strict limits on public assemblies contained in the Public Order Act, which requires police permits for any “cause-related” assembly outside the closely monitored “Speakers’ Corner.” - Human Rights Watch: Singapore So doesn't this sound exactly like Chinese political system? So doesn't this sound exactly like Chinese political system?
    2
  10807.  @auroragb  Go and look at Taiwan's constitution and it clearly says that Taiwan is part of China under the One China Policy. The Kuomintang holds the "One China Principle" and maintains its claim that under the ROC Constitution (passed by the Kuomintang government in 1947 in Nanjing) the ROC has sovereignty over most of China (including by their interpretation both mainland China and Taiwan). And like I said earlier, the UN countries voted to democratically kick ROC out of the UN security council and to recognize PRC as the legitimate China. Your countries literally voted to only recognize PRC as China, so why are you claiming that the mainland prevents TW from being represented and served by most international organizations? You are just trying to twist it to pin the blame of Taiwan's problems on the mainland that's all. Just like you tried to impose imaginary time limit to Article 45 and numerous fake arguments.
    2
  10808.  @auroragb  About democracy, why do you think allowing ordinary people to participate in political decisions is a good idea? Ordinary people don't necessarily know how to vote responsibly (e.g they fail to turn up to vote) or they may base their decisions on emotions not logic (e.g Many British don't like immigrants, so they voted for Brexit in the referendum) or they may be susceptible to foreign influence (e.g. Russian interference in U.S Elections) Or they may simply lack political awareness of their country's situation. Why not let those who know how to govern, govern? That's what China is doing by letting CCP govern China, and it works marvelously. That's what single-party KMT did for Taiwan and it worked splendidly. That's what Britain did for Hong Kong while it was still British colony and it worked as well. Why follow Western democracy, just because Westerners touted it as the "best" form of government? Video: Ted Talk: Eric X. Li: A tale of two political systems youtube.com/watch?v=s0YjL9rZyR0&t=12
    2
  10809.  @auroragb  Since you believe in power of the people, then consider this question: Who is more qualified to lead the country? The People or The Government? If you selected The People, then why do countries still need The Government for? Ordinary people can't be trusted to understand the intricacies of politics so what's involve them in important decisions that will affect the country's future? Look Brexit and you think the ordinary British citizen make rational decisions? Most of them don't like foreigners so that's why majority voted in a referendum for Britain to exit the EU and look at the mess it created. British leaders like the former PM Theresa May can't even focus on solving Britain's problems because the British government has to settle Brexit first. Why involve ordinary people in politics? Why not just let the people who know how to govern, govern?
    2
  10810.  @auroragb  China's ghost cities are being filled up. For example, in 2011, London’s Daily Mail reported that the Zhengzhou New Area was China’s largest ghost city, but today, the city has a population of 10,120,000 inhabitants, and had a GDP of 1,014 billion (RMB) in 2018. Don't believe me? Here is beautiful video of Zhengzhou: youtube.com/watch?v=jFdLkgDS-QE&t=8 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for the best experience) This just means that time is needed for China to fill up those cities that's all, since China still have millions of people in the rural countryside migrating to the cities every day and are slowing filling up our "ghost cities."
    2
  10811.  @auroragb  You can't even answer my simple question, so you decided to twist those words to a different meaning? The People refers to the common masses and the ordinary folk, while The Government refers to the governing body, (The Communist Party of China in the case of China) so where did I ever said that the government isn't made of people?
    2
  10812.  @auroragb  Then why don't you explain what's wrong with letting the government govern the country instead of the people? So far you have presented hardly any evidence that being led by the people is better than being led by the government. You are clearly twisting the meaning of the term The People to mean "human beings" instead of "the masses," because you didn't answer the question. Because the obvious answer is that all countries need a government to sustain them, and no country can survive without any form of governance. Even when there is apparent anarchy, there will be some group or clique of people that take leadership over the country.
    2
  10813.  @auroragb  About democracy again, why do you think allowing ordinary people to vote in political decisions is a good idea? You look at the ordinary people in your neighborhood like the beggars, the drunkards, the deadbeats, the drug addicts, etc, and why do you think allowing these people to participate in political decision making is a good idea? Do they make decisions based on emotions or logic? Are they susceptible to politicians false promises or to foreign interference in your elections? And do they have good political awareness of the country's situation to make important decisions regarding the country's future? There's a whole multitude of problems associated with democracy, and yet you somehow think that democracy is the best political system? Just because those Westerners keep on telling you? And why don't you answer my previous question for you to dissolve your own government, since you think the people are the government?
    2
  10814.  @auroragb  China's infrastructure construction is quite possibly the best in the world, and many of the world's tallest buildings reside in China. As of 2019, out of the Top 64 highest buildings, 32 (50%) are located in China according to source: List of tallest buildings wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings#Tallest_buildings_in_the_world Like I said, Zhengzhou was once considered China's largest "Ghost City" back in 2011 by London's Daily Mail so shouldn't you be considered the housing prices of units in Zhengzhou rural area, back in 2011 when it was considered a ghost city then? And like I said, the city has a population of 10,120,000 inhabitants, and had a GDP of 1,014 billion (RMB) in 2018, so obviously Zhengzhou should be classified as a ghost city that has filled up. So why would rural immigrants migrate to an already filled-up ghost city you tell me? Rural immigrants would be migrating to the other Chinese ghost cities that haven't been filled up yet, where the housing prices are lower and more jobs are available, rather than the filled-up ghost cities like Zhengzhou and Changzhou.
    2
  10815.  @auroragb  Who's asking you to dissolve people? It's obvious you can't even answer this simple question, so you deliberately try to twist the words into a different meaning and purposely misinterpret the question so that you don't have to answer it. If you believe people are capable of running the country themselves, then why not dissolve your government and let the people run the country themselves? Why do you still need a government then you tell me? I have already modified the question to be as specific as possible, what more can I modify it to make my meaning any more clearer? You just refuse to answer its because deep down you know that countries need a government to control their people. Why not listen to what the government is doing then? Why not let the people who know how to govern, govern? About Trump, Brexit, Great Leap Forward, Cultural Revolution, etc, you claimed that at least with democracy, the people can only blame themselves for bad choices. But people blaming themselves does not equate to actually taking responsibility for those actions. Look at the US, and the Republicans and Democrats are fighting among themselves, instead of fighting for America's future. Their elected leaders sabotage and hinder the opposition's plans, instead of tackling America's woes, like rising healthcare, debt, violence, etc. and Trump's election has created a deep political rift within American society today. Why should China adopt such a chaotic system like Western democracy then? The CCP is not perfect yes, and made mistakes in the past, but the clear difference is that the CCP acknowledges the mistakes and move on. The CCP has long acknowledged the failure of Great Leap Forwards (and even Mao Zedong himself made a self-criticism and stepped down as State Chairman) and learned from it. In a multiple-party system, the two or more parties blame each other for the country's woes, but in a single-party system, the party itself is to blame for all the bad things and all the good things. That's why China's single-party system is superior, because it accepts responsibility for failures, learn from it and move on, while the Republicans and Democrats in America are diverting blame elsewhere.
    2
  10816.  @auroragb  Because those things ARE accomplishments of China, but I clearly never said China invented those things. If you want to talk about Chinese inventions then I can gladly enlighten you on Chinese inventions. With the invention of Paper, came Chinese inventions like paper napkins, umbrellas, paper lanterns, paper folding fans, and the very important, paper banknote, which facilitated easier business transactions since merchants no longer need to carry around excessive amounts of metal coinage and precious stones. Paper helped mankind's understanding of aviation with the Chinese invention of the kite (thought to be the earliest example of man-made flight, and was vital in Franklin's kite experiment) and the world's first hot air balloons were Chinese Sky lanterns (天灯) or also known as Kongming Lanterns (孔明灯). The world's first use of a helicoptor rotor for vertical flight has existed since 400 BC in the form of the Chinese bamboo-copter, (竹蜻蜓 'Bamboo Dragonfly') Here is a beautiful video of people celebrating RISE Lantern Festival in Las Vegas with Chinese Sky Lanterns. Video: youtube.com/watch?v=SNtwlBbBdb4&t=10 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    2
  10817.  @RaginYak  Firstly, the McMohan line was drawn by British India, without even consulting any Chinese or Tibetan authority. They just drew the line without bothering to talk to the locals and bypassing the Chinese intermediary, even though Tibet at that time was under Chinese suzerainity as recognised by British India. In 1907, Britain and Russia acknowledged Chinese "suzerainty" over Tibet and that both nations "engage not to enter into negotiations with Tibet except through the intermediary of the Chinese Government." Article II. In conformity with the admitted principle of the suzerainty of China over Thibet, Great Britain and Russia engage not to enter into negotiations with Thibet except through the intermediary of the Chinese Government. Source: Convention Between Great Britain and Russia (1907) tibetjustice.org/materials/treaties/treaties12.html Since Britain acknowledged the Chinese suzerainity over Tibet, then who gives them the enter negotiations with Tibet over the McMohan line, without consulting Chinese emissary? Therefore, shouldn't the McMohan line be invalid, since Britain doesn't even acknowledge Tibetan independence in the first place? Secondly, what has mountain climbers even got to do with this discussion about sovereignty?
    2
  10818.  @samuelboucher1454  "神州 Shenzhou China is supporting Pakistan against India" Pakistan is our "iron brother" 巴铁 because our bond is as strong as iron. Pakistan always helped China in our time of need, so why can't China support Pakistan then? Look at India and they provided asylum to the Chinese fugitive, the 14th Dalai Lama, so who knows what intentions India has towards Tibet Autonomous Region in China? "China supports Venezuela dictatorship" Nicolás Maduro is the democratically elected President of Venezuela, and he won his 2nd term in the 2018 election, garnering 67.84% of the votes, so what's wrong with China supporting Maduro you tell me? Venezuela is suffering from hyperinflation today, because President Trump slapped crippling sanctions on Venezuela which cause their food prices to skyrocket. China's Belt and Road Initiative is NOT the same as the Opium War, China did NOT wage war with BRI countries and force them to join the BRI. Participation in BRI is entirely voluntarily. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us. And what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Haven't you seen Chinese tourists in your lands? Or Chinese international students flooding Western schools and universities? Who said that Natives speaking out against Great Britain weren't "disappeared"? Look at what Great Britain did to Indian rebels. They tied Indians to the mouth of a loaded cannon and executed them by blasting a hole in their chests, a brutal execution method known as "Blowing from a Gun" Source: Blowing from a gun wikipedia.org/wiki/Blowing_from_a_gun Suppression of the Indian Revolt by the English, which depicts the execution of mutineers by blowing from a gun by the British, a painting by Vasily Vereshchagin c. 1884.
    2
  10819.  @samuelboucher1454  1. Pakistan, our iron brother, always helped China in our time of need. What has India actually done to help China? Then can't China support Pakistan over India? Pakistan is their own sovereign country "separate" from India after 1947, so why can't China support the Pakistan against India? India and Pakistan are literally "blood brother" states, and they rather fight among themselves? 2. Maduro is the democratically elected President of Venezuela and he won his 2nd term in the 2018 elections, so why can't China support Venezuela? And Trump slapped crippling sanctions on Venezuela because Maduro refused to be a slave to the US Petrol Dollar and he decided to switch to Chinese Yuan instead. Venezuela's Maduro says will shun U.S. dollar in favor of yuan, others reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-forex/venezuelas-maduro-says-will-shun-us-dollar-in-favor-of-yuan-others-idUSKCN1BJ06O That's why Trump intends to make life difficult for Maduro and drive up food prices in Venezuela with his economic sanctions on Venezuela. 3. First you compared Belt and Road Initiative to Opium Wars, now you are comparing it to French colonisation of Indochina? China did not make colonies unlike France, and participation in BRI is entirely voluntarily like I said earlier. Countries have the option to withdraw from the BRI anytime they want. 4. Who says that Chinese can't speak out against the government? Have you actually seen what Chinese netizens say in Weibo and other Chinese social media sites, before you accuse China of such a thing? 5. Britain did horrible things to the virtually the entire world, building their success upon the backs of African slavery, genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, occupation of their lands even till today, brutal colonisation of Asia (India, Hong Kong, Singapore, etc) and African countries, and plundering resources like gold. British people today are so rich, because they're sitting on a pile of wealth that their ancestors stole from Asia, Africa America and Australia.
    2
  10820.  @RaginYak  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CCP, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    2
  10821.  @RaginYak  About "East Turkestan," Xinjiang was part of China since before Islam itself was born and was known as Xiyu (西域) under the Han dynasty (200 BC). Older English-language reference works often refer to Xinjiang as Chinese Turkestan, and the name "East Turkestan" is a fake name created by Russian sinologist to replace "Chinese Turkestan" in 1829. So who gives these foreigners the right to rename actual Chinese territory? "East Turkestan" is a fake name created by Russian sinologist to replace "Chinese Turkestan" in 1829 that's all.
    2
  10822.  @RaginYak  This is a travel video of a Canadian (Vafa Anderson) and his experience in Lhasa, Tibet, China. He takes the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) and explains how each carriage comes with its own oxygen tank. He describes how developed Lhasa has become, since his last visit to Lhasa 10 years ago (in 2006) yet there are still many religious people swinging prayer wheels, pilgrims performing full-body prostrates and so on. Video: Welcome to Lhasa (By Vafa Anderson) youtu.be/J-TfN56ETVM Have you actually been to Tibet and see what life is like there for yourself?
    2
  10823.  @samuelboucher1454  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    2
  10824.  @RaginYak  I showed you a video of Canadian tourist to Lhasa and you just dismiss it as proving nothing? Here's a video of Tibetan University 西藏大学 in Lhasa, Tibet, China and also from a Japanese exchange student studying there. Video: Tibet University |西藏大学 (The scenery of Lhasa and campus) youtu.be/G3uKNz7xOnk Video: Play ground in Tibet University 2014 youtu.be/Ktqxm-ofkN8 Have you actually been to Tibet, China and see what life is like there for yourself?
    2
  10825.  @RaginYak  You can't refute my points, so you start resorting to hurling vulgarities against me, like d**khead, just because my views happen to differ from yours? I have at least cited sources (including videos) to argue my points, but what exactly have you shown to support yours? Mountain climbers seeking permission? National Geographic displaying Tibetan flag? Those aren't really concrete evidence of Tibet independence, its the fact that Tibet has been part of China since 800 years ago, and even today, the Seventeen Point Agreement was signed by the Tibetans in 1951, affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet.
    2
  10826.  charlie  If China paid Cyrus, then why does he have a sponsor in his video?
    2
  10827.  @stunningandbrave2520  "It is safe to assume that the CCP granted you a license to access YouTube." Nope, I bought my own VPN. Same with many people also buying VPN for use in China.
    2
  10828.  @item6931  "The vast majority of his vids have no sponsor, so his question is understandable." Have you watched all of Cyrus Janssen's videos? How many of them do not have sponsors?
    2
  10829.  @MarkYeung1  The National Security law was long overdue. Under Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 (香港基本法第二十三條), Hong Kong was supposed to implement a national security law to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government (i.e Beijing) and to prohibit foreign political organizations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region. So Beijing complied with this law.
    2
  10830.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Numerous surveys in Hong Kong and Taiwan (both part of China) people favor free internet without censorship." Good for them. Do you have the survey for mainlanders? If not, then most Chinese mainlanders don't really see a need to change whatever Internet restrictions the mainland has.
    2
  10831.  @MarkYeung1  "Why can't the Beijing government listen to the people?" What makes you think Beijing government doesn't listen to the people? Beijing had initially wanted to implement a vac mandate, but scrapped the idea after facing backlash from Chinese netizens. Whereas in Canada for example, those truckers protesting against mandates had their bank accounts frozen.
    2
  10832.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Do you have any survey in mainland China for netizens who support internet censorship by government?" Harvard University and Ash Center did a long-term survey about Chinese satisfaction, and found that around 80-90 percent of Chinese citizens support the government. So it can be taken that mainlanders are reasonably satisfied with government's handling of issues.
    2
  10833.  @farhanaf832  "Always remember china attacked India without provoking" Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai had formulated the _ Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence (和平共处五项原则)_ to define China-India relations and to resolve our border dispute peacefully. But Indian PM Nehru wasn't interested in peace, instead he pursued his aggressive Forward Policy of building military outposts at our disputed border. There were eventually 60 such outposts, including 43 north of the McMahon Line and into actual Chinese territory itself. In the end, China had to act to defend our territory from the Indian intrusion and building military outposts in actual recognized Chinese territory north of McMahon line.
    2
  10834.  @farhanaf832  "Always remember china attacked India without provoking" Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai had formulated the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence (和平共处五项原则) to define China-India relations and to resolve our border dispute peacefully. But Indian PM Nehru wasn't interested in peace, instead he pursued his aggressive Forward Policy of building military outposts at our disputed border. There were eventually 60 such outposts, including 43 north of the McMahon Line and into actual Chinese territory itself. In the end, China had to act to defend our territory from the Indian intrusion and building military outposts in actual recognized Chinese territory north of McMahon line.
    2
  10835.  @bits_for_bytes  "神州 Shenzhou shenzen shut up bot" Who are you to tell others to shut up?
    2
  10836.  @item6931  "I didn't have to: I checked the vid descriptions. You can stop being lazy and check for yourself." I've found that the majority of Cyrus videos include sponsors in them. I mean, if he was really paid by the Chinese government then for what reason would he even need any sponsor at all? It makes no sense.
    2
  10837.  @farhanaf832  Go and read up on Zhou Enlai's Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence (和平共处五项原则). Zhou Enlai visited New Delhi multiple times to negotiate peace, but Nehru refused to sit down and only visited Beijing once. Instead Nehru pursued his aggressive Forward Policy of building military outposts at our disputed border. India even built bases beyond the McMahon Line (43 outposts) and onto actual Chinese territory.
    2
  10838.  @bartonlee3594  It's obvious that you do not respect my opinions. You keep on demanding answers out of me incessantly, while refusing to answer any of my own questions, then what sort of respect is this?
    2
  10839. Laying flat only constitutes a small minority of China's youth.
    2
  10840.  @mage9825  President Xi Jinping himself draws a meager salary of just 136,620 yuan (about $22,000), making him among the lowest paid world leader even lower than Indian PM Narendra Modi's $30,000 a month. Whereas Singapore's PM is arguably the highest paid leader, it's almost as if the corruption is legalized as part of his salary.
    2
  10841.  @Nesher92  Mainland China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Taiwan's high-speed rail (and Japan's Shinkansen) in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    2
  10842.  real balance  Japan also has a 99% conviction rate. Even Canada has a 97-99% conviction rate, so what's your point then? Having a low conviction rate is worrying because it implies that police are arresting innocent people. Source: news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22090430 In Canada, the national conviction rate is about 97%. This does not include cases in which the charges are dropped, which comprise about one-third of criminal cases. Absent Quebec, the province with the lowest conviction rate, the figure is 99%. If a country has a low conviction rate, it could be because cops are arresting lots of innocent people.
    2
  10843.  @Grgrrr  What makes you think Chinese people lack freedoms? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationthailand.com/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    2
  10844.  Shawn Gibson  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwan is the ROC…" Go and read ROC's constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    2
  10845.  Shawn Gibson  "神州 Shenzhou not true. Wumao." Why not attempt to refute my points instead of resorting to ad hominen attacks against me for my views? Let's hear your thoughts why you think that's not true.
    2
  10846.  Shawn Gibson  If the Communist Party of China has done an excellent job governing China and controlling the coronavirus outbreak (where Western countries are failing) then shouldn't the CPC be commended for their efforts?
    2
  10847.  lenley Campbell  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    2
  10848.  @svetoslavpp  Anti-China sentiment is growing in the West. China warmly welcomes Westerners to our lands as visitors, but Westerners treat Chinese in their lands as "the enemy".
    2
  10849.  @seewahleong8459  What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationthailand.com/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    2
  10850.  @seewahleong8459  About so-called IP theft, when foreign companies come to China, they agreed to transfer technology as part of the terms of setting up shop here in China, so how exactly is that theft? Nobody force those companies to set up shop here in China, if they don't like our terms, they are always welcome to pack their bags and take their business elsewhere. But if your company wants to set up shop here in China, then you are expected to obey Chinese laws while in China. Yet Western companies agreed to transfer technology to China, but now they suddenly change their minds and accuse China of stealing technologies and IP?
    2
  10851.  @seewahleong8459  Here's Dr Richard Wolff explaining how foreign companies (like Apple, Nike, etc) agreed to transfer technology to China as part of the terms of setting up shop in China. They agreed to technology transfers, so yet they suddenly turn around and accused China of IP theft. Video: Wolff Responds: China's Intellectual Property Theft youtu.be/n_klwY2RJDc
    2
  10852.  @seewahleong8459  Chinese tourists made 169 million outbound trips in 2019 and the vast majority (99.99%) of Chinese tourists come back to China, so what makes you think they aren't coming back to China?
    2
  10853.  @IdeaBoxful  Besides Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, etc, Chinese companies also dominate the civilian drone industry and Chinese company DJI is world's largest civilian drone-maker according to the following source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 top10drone.com/top-drone-companies/ But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    2
  10854.  @svetoslavpp  Why do you want the Communist Party of China to be taken down? The CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China? How is the CPC the evil that makes Chinese people poor and miserable more and more every day? According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    2
  10855.  @svetoslavpp  I dislike those anti-China people who always use the same stale excuse of "I'm not anti-China, I'm just anti-CPC" to defend themselves and justify their anti-China stance. These anti-China people clearly don't care about China's interest, they just can't stand to see China succeed that's all. So what U.S laws did Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou break, you tell me? Just cause she was accused by USA, means that she has to be detained in her home for 2 years (since 2018)? Where's the USA proof of her crimes then? Obviously the USA is trying to strike an economic blow against Huawei (because Huawei is so successful) and to wound Chinese national pride, is this how Westerners treat Chinese? 8 months ago isn't that old. It clearly shows that anti-China sentiment is growing in the West, what makes you think that Jusy because 8 months passed, that anti-China sentiment will magically go away? Here's a 39-year-old Asian woman from New York City suffered severe burns across her body after someone sneaked up behind her as she was throwing out the trash and splashed her with acid. Video: Asian woman attacked with acid outside her home in New York youtu.be/_XizsaCNaHc How is the coronavirus a creation of the CPC? The coronavirus lab origins myth have long been debunked by experts. Source: Live Science: The coronavirus was not engineered in a lab. livescience.com/coronavirus-not-human-made-in-lab.html You people are clearly anti-China to begin with, you're just trying to justify your anti-China stance that's all.
    2
  10856.  @Nesher92  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Otherwise, where is Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? If not, then Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    2
  10857.  @svetoslavpp  Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? Why do you want Chinese people to overthrow our government? The CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a cataclysmic event to happen to China? It's clear that you don't care about China's interests, so why pretend that you're not anti-China? I've been to the West before and some Westerners abused racial slurs against me, calling me "chink" and told me "Go back to China!" or "Stop stealing our jobs!", so it's clear that anti-China sentiment is growing in the West. Video: The Chinese students fighting racism - BBC News youtu.be/dsVIvpXBYes
    2
  10858.  @Nesher92  Why don't you tell the non-Native Americans, Canadians and Australians to get out of America and Australia and leave those lands to Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals then?
    2
  10859.  @Nesher92  You yourself not even from Hong Kong or Taiwan, yet you want to decide for them? Then why can't I decide for Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals then?
    2
  10860.  @Nesher92  Why doesn't mainland China have a say in Taiwan? Taiwan constitution already claims that Taiwan is part of China, then why can't mainland Chinese have a say in Taiwan? You're not even from Hong Kong or Taiwan yet you want to speak on their behalf?
    2
  10861.  @Nesher92  Taiwan constitution claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of its territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's map of ROC Administrative and Claims. Source: Map of ROC Administrative and Claims wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg If California state suddenly wants to declare independence, then don't the Americans in Washington, New York and other places have a say in California independence?
    2
  10862.  @Nesher92  Where is Taiwan's formal declaration of independence then? Who signed it and when was it signed? If not then, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. And previously, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong while it was a British colony. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    2
  10863.  @Nesher92  Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    2
  10864.  @TacticalMayo  Protected indeed.
    2
  10865. +Narendra Modi The US approach to dealing with terrorism is to invade those countries. Ordinary people join terrorism because they are poor, jobless or angry at their government or USA. For example, Al Qaeda is actually trained by CIA, but they rebelled. Even ISIL's rise is said to be attributed to constant US intervention in the ME. When one terrorist group is destroyed, another group pops up to replace it. China's approach to dealing with terrorism is different from USA. China is building infrastructure in Pakistan so that people can find work, instead of flocking to join the terrorists. As Pakistan economy grows, terrorists will find a shrinking pool of angry people to recruit to their cause. Once the country's economy is stable, then it's likely that the government will stabilise as well. Chinese government has tried to get Pyongyang to open up as well, but ultimately the choice lies with them. USA been fighting "terrorism" for over 15 years without resolving the problem and it clearly isn't working out. So why not try a different approach instead of continuing on the same path? If India wants to be a super power, then it will have to work towards becoming one, instead of just dreaming. China worked hard to get to where we are today, having world's 2nd largest economy and largest land army PLA to protect us, as well as being a global player in world politics. If India wants to do the same, then Indians will have to work towards this goal.
    2
  10866.  @chozer1  Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931, Nationalist Kuomintang leader Chiang kai-shek was reluctant to face them, instead he continued purging communists (our own fellow Chinese) instead of meeting the Japanese invaders. Until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap Chiang and force him to ally with the communists against the Japanese. This incident was later known as the Xi'an Incident (西安事变) (wikipedia.org/wiki/Xi%27an_Incident#Negotiations_and_release ) Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was thanks to communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release and to form a united front against the Japanese invaders.
    2
  10867. @nationalghost You keep on claiming CCP rule is illegal and unaccepted by rest of the world, but it was United Nation's own decision to kick out Republic of China (Taiwan) and to recognize the People's Republic of China (China) as China, through a democratic voting process back in 1971. According to United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1668, any proposal to change the designated representation of China at the UN would require a two-thirds majority vote and the poll results were 61 in favor, 34 against it, 7 abstaining and 2 non-voting. Next, the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response and the results were 76 in favor, 35 against it, 17 abstaining and 3 non-voting as shown in the following map. Source; Map of results of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Voting_res_2758.png Therefore PRC won the vote and the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, and recognized the People's Republic of China (PRC) as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed the collective representatives of Chiang Kai-shek and the Republic of China from the United Nations. So your countries literally voted democratically back in 1971 to recognize CCP rule as legitimate over China in the UN security council and to kick the KMT out of the UNSC. What more needs to be said about CCP's legitimacy?
    2
  10868. @eagle2125 As Global South countries develop and lift themselves out of poverty, they'll become potential markets for Chinese goods.
    2
  10869. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  10870.  @yfelwulf  Lithium batteries have raised concerns over their environmental friendliness, so Chinese companies are investing in Sodium Solid-State batteries, which holds promise for its longer life span, increase range and faster charging rates compared to lithium batteries. Sodium is also more environmentally friendly than Lithium and is also cheaper as well, making electric cars more affordable to the masses.
    2
  10871.  @valeenoi2284  Every country have certain sensitive issues which they can't talk about in public. For example, if you wave Nazi Swastika Flag (outside of historical context) in countries like Germany, France and Austria, then you might get arrested by police. The Communist Hammer and Sickle Flag is also banned in those former Soviet Union countries like Ukraine, Lithuania, Czech Republic, etc. Source: Bans on Nazi Symbols wikipedia.org/wiki/Post%E2%80%93World_War_II_legality_of_Nazi_flags Source: Bans on Communist Symbols wikipedia.org/wiki/Bans_on_Communist_symbols Therefore, every country has limitations on freedom of speech and China is no different in this regard.
    2
  10872.  @AlphaQ922  "a) incarceration of millions of Uyghurs in concentration camps." Where do you get this figure of millions of Uighurs detained? Turns out this figure came from 2 dubious sources, one of which only interviewed 8 Uighurs on what their estimated number of Uighurs in re-education schools were, and then they extrapolated the figure to arrive at the figure of 1 million Uighurs in detention. Source: China detaining millions of Uyghurs? Serious problems with claims by US-backed NGO and far-right researcher ‘led by God’ against Beijing thegrayzone.com/2019/12/21/china-detaining-millions-uyghurs-problems-claims-us-ngo-researcher/ While CHRD states that it interviewed dozens of ethnic Uyghurs in the course of its study, their enormous estimate was ultimately based on interviews with exactly eight Uyghur individuals.
    2
  10873.  @AlphaQ922  "b) forced abortions and sterilisation of Uyghurs" Let me guess, you got your statistics from Adrian Zenz? Uighurs in China aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want, the Uighur population in China actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs since 1953. According to Adrian Zenz report, he wrote that 80% of IUD insertions took place in Xinjiang (when China's official data is 8% of IUD insertions took place in Xinjiang). There's a graph in Adrian Zenz's paper, where he claims that women in Xinjiang receive between 800 and 1400 net added IUD placements per capita. That means according to Adrian Zenz, women receive 4-8 IUD placement surgeries per day! How's that possible? Video: Grayzone report rebukes 'genocide' accusation against China youtu.be/xGWo9ooTvgg
    2
  10874.  @AlphaQ922  "c) destruction of mosques d) forced conversion from Islam." China has built at least 35,000 mosques, more than France's 2,300, America's 2,106, and Great Britain's 1,600. Even on the per capital basis, Chinese Muslims still have more than triple the amount of mosques their Western peers have. Video: What's China's 're-education camp' in Xinjiang really about? youtu.be/U3YBomwuB10?t=80
    2
  10875.  @AlphaQ922  You said: "then Afghanistan should be part China" The Republic of China 🇹🇼 that lost the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and fled to Taiwan, they still claim all of mainland China, as well as territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of all the territory that ROC (Taiwan) claims (wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan still claims all those territory as part of the Republic of China. Even though they lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan.
    2
  10876.  @valeenoi2284  Jack Ma was selfishly calling for more economic benefits to be granted to corporations and rich people, leaving less for the ordinary people of China, why should the Communist Party of China tolerate that? Jack Ma only had his own interests (and his company's) not the ordinary Chinese people's interest at heart.
    2
  10877.  @valeenoi2284  Capitalists seek to shrink worker wages in order to skim off a wide profit margin. The Communist Party of China created more jobs and lifted more people out of poverty in China, than what Jack Ma ever did. According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china The Communist Party of China is fighting for China's interests, whereas Jack Ma's move is fighting for his own interests (and his company's). President Xi Jinping is fighting to remain on power, because only through the CPC being in power, can the Chinese government control the state-owned companies for China's benefit. Whereas in USA, the U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit, waging wars in the Middle East to control the oil, for example.
    2
  10878.  @huangcc72  So she's now furthering her studies for PhD that's all, but you asked why she don't want to go back to China even after graduated, but I've already said she returned to China upon her graduation in 2014, so why did you claim she didn't want to return to China?
    2
  10879.  @pierremarel  You said: "Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines do not “occupy” but actually own the islands you are referring to." So when it comes to those countries, they own those islands, but in China's case, China is occupying them? What sort of biased double standards is this? You disregard China's historical claims to the South China Sea Islands, claiming it's an occupation, whereas Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines are automatically granted ownership of those islands?
    2
  10880. Democracy starts with sovereignty. If your country allows foreign government sponsored organizations to interfere in your country's politics, then your country doesn't have sovereignty, and therefore no democracy.
    2
  10881.  @elanor2123  Falungong was founded in 1992 by a man named Li Hongzhi, by hijacking existing practices from Taoism, Buddhism, and traditional Qigong practices. This should already sound off alarm bells that it's actually a cult in disguise. Falungong practitioners believe Li Hongzhi has the supernatural ability to cure all ailments and none are allowed to question the basic assumptions concerning his purported supernatural powers, teachings and/or opinions. There have been cases of Falungong practitioners who are early-stage cancer patients, yet they refuse to seek medical treatment, instead they are encouraged to donate their savings to Li, in hopes of him curing their cancer. The cancer patients died in the end. -There were 2,365 Falungong practitioners who have turned themselves into victims of the cult. 1,559 of them died of suicide or rejecting medical treatment; 651 suffered from mental disorders; 11 killed others; and 144 became disabled. -On January 23, 2001, seven Falun Gong practitioners, at the request of Li Hongzhi that "let go of life and death," set themselves on fire at the Tian'anmen Square, resulted in two deaths and three disabled because of serious injuries. -From May 25 to June 27, 2003, an obsessed Falun Gong follower named Chen Fuzhao killed 16 people with rat toxicant in order to "enhance his Gong powers." Of all the victims, 15 were junkmen or beggars, and one was a Buddhist. Doesn't this sound similar to the Tibetan monks who doused themselves in oil and set themselves on fire, either sacrificing their lives or permanently scarring themselves, just for the sake of "religion"? Or like the terrorists who strapped bombs to themselves and blow up innocent people, sacrificing their lives to advance the terrorists' cause?
    2
  10882.  @MarkYeung1  Britain had been governing Hong Kong under authoritarian colonial rule for 150 years, now they suddenly want to introduce "democracy" to Hong Kong before they return Hong Kong back to China? And let's face it, Hong Kong was actually more prosperous under authoritarian rule than it is under democracy today, so why was there a need to switch their political system to democracy?
    2
  10883.  Edmund Kemper  Did you know that AIDS was discovered in the USA? Should USA be fined for all the tragic deaths caused by AIDS over the years? And why do you refer to Covid-19 by it's improper name? Look at all those racially-motivated attacks against Asian Americans (Asian Canadians, Asian Australians, Asian Europeans, etc) because American politicians like Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo choose to refer to the virus by it's improper name. Video: Asian Americans face discrimination in wake of the coronavirus youtu.be/t_IyTxRNUYk
    2
  10884.  @MarkYeung1  Hong Kong became a British colony back in 1841. But it took until the 1950s and 1960s did Britain suddenly decided to consider granting "democracy" to Hong Kong, when they had none before? Why didn't Britain grant Hong Kong democracy back in 1841? Only when they want to return to Hong Kong back to China, then they decided democracy is for Hong Kong? They are returning territory that they took from China back to China, why is there a need to change the colony's political system when they are returning what they took from China?
    2
  10885.  @MarkYeung1  Given that Hong Kong had been governed as a British colony for centuries, Hong Kong was unprepared for democratic rule. After the 1997 handover, most Hong Kong voters were indifferent to politics. Hong Kong governors were used to receiving instructions from Britain on how to govern Hong Kong, now they have to make all the governing decision themselves and they weren't used to this, and they didn't know what goals to achieve in Hong Kong. That's why the housing problem in Hong Kong grew unchecked, and Hong Kong leaders don't know how to solve Hong Kong's problems and Hong Kong citizens start protesting because of Hong Kong troubles. The problems in Hong Kong were caused Hong Kong government inadequacy, not because of mainland China, but some Hong Kong people choose to blame the mainland for their woes.
    2
  10886.  @MarkYeung1  Perhaps this timeline could better explain my point: 1841-1950: Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. There was no attempt to introduce democracy to Hong Kong until 1950s and 1960s by the British, so Hong Kong had no experience in democracy (i.e Hong Kong was unprepared for democratic rule) 1997: Hong Kong was handover back to China, and Hong Kong has democracy under One Country, Two Systems Policy (formulated in the early 1980s by Deng Xiaoping). Hong Kong has their own government separate from the mainland, and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections, it's the people of Hong Kong that elect their leaders. However, Hong Kong's elected leaders were inadequate in solving Hong Kong's problems. Because Hong Kong did not have democracy while it was under British colonial rule, so their system produce inadequate leaders elected by Hong Kong voters. If you claim Beijing did not support Hong Kong democracy since 1950s, then why did Beijing allow One Country, Two Systems Policy? If there was no democracy in Hong Kong, then it would simply One Country, One System, yet Hong Kong clearly have their own government separate from the mainland. And Hong Kong vote for their leaders and Beijing doesn't cast any vote in Hong Kong's elections. The bottom line is, Hong Kong actually thrived under authoritarian rule, it's under democracy that Hong Kong is suffering today.
    2
  10887.  @MarkYeung1  Hong Kong was actually flourishing under authoritarian British colonial rule, but today it's suffering under democracy, because its elected governments are inadequate in solving Hong Kong problems, and Hong Kong citizens were indifferent to politics because they had no history of democracy. You know, when Britain returned Hong Kong to China, why didn't Britain just fully return Hong Kong as it was? Hong Kong is governed under One Country, Two Systems Policy when every other country in the world is One Country, One System?
    2
  10888. War's already been won. The question should be how will peace be won.
    2
  10889. It doesn't always have to be a zero-sum game, where one benefits at the expense of others. China is striving for win-win scenarios where both parties benefit.
    2
  10890. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    2
  10891.  @sibtainraza8673  Is heavy payload like Falcon Heavy really needed for asteroid mining? China's plan to mine asteroids is to first select a smaller size asteroid, then send a swarm of robot probes to trap the asteroid in a sort of butterfly net to gently steer it Earthward, and wrapping it up within heat-shielding space blanket to allow it safe entry into Earth's atmosphere. Source: Chinese Scientists Have Insane Plan To Lasso Asteroids And Bring Them Back To Earth In Blankets outerplaces.com/science/item/18727-china-lasso-asteroid-mining Therefore, it doesn't require sending humans into space, nor does it need a large payload rocket to do so. You just need enough payload to send the probes that's all, and you can do it with multiple, repeated rocket launches.
    2
  10892.  @Seastallion  China has achieved sending our own people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board the Shenzhou-5 神舟五号 Spacecraft, making China the 3rd country in the world to independently send people into space, joining the ranks of USA and USSR. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtube.com/watch?v=tIviKg4Mduw China is also the first Asian country to achieve this feat, and even Japan, Korea and India have not conducted manned space missions of their own. Even SpaceX has not yet sent an astronaut into space, even thought Falcon Heavy was designed to carry humans into space beyond low Earth orbit, and Elon Musk does not plan to apply for a human-rating certification to carry NASA astronauts.
    2
  10893.  @billyehh  I never said that rare earth metals aren't found everywhere, I merely said that China is home to 80-90% of the world's rare earth metals production. And you claim it would take a year to produce them elsewhere, but can they produce them as cheaply as China does? If not, then the cost of Made-in-Elsewhere products will be higher than Made-in-China products using rare earths refined in China.
    2
  10894.  @plaguedoc7727  Here's an analogy of the Russo-Ukraine crisis taken off Facebook. Before I went to sleep, my wife said to me: "This Russia is such a bad country, if Ukraine wants to join NATO, it is their business and freedom, Russia has no right to intervene. This is just an excuse for Russia to invade Ukraine." I said nothing, got out of bed, went to the kitchen and returned to bed with knife in my hand. I told my wife: "Let's go to sleep" My wife looked at me with her wide eyes. "What are you doing, sleeping with a knife?!" she exclaimed. I replied: "Don’t worry, let’s go to sleep. Besides, sleeping with a knife is none of your business and it is my freedom." My wife said: "How can I sleep when you are sleeping with a knife? What if you accidentally cut me?" I said: “Well, You don’t even trust your own husband, how can you expect Russia to trust Ukraine? Sleeping with a knife is like Ukraine joining the NATO."
    2
  10895.  @IAMDIMITRI  Granted, the Chinese Communist Party is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    2
  10896.  @dagsmoko3889  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    2
  10897.  @dagsmoko3889  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA, in all 3 subjects (reading, science and mathematics). PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    2
  10898. The Uighur Genocide narrative is being kept afloat through incestuous propagation from the same few long-debunked sources like Zenz and ASPI. Just a poke and the whole narrative collapses like a house of cards.
    2
  10899.  @intothewrx  I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, and I was appalled at the sheer amount of Western anti-China propaganda out there. Whenever I bring up China's achievements, many Westerners just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist shill, or told me to "Go back to China if you like it there."
    2
  10900.  @AQuietNight  "神州 Shenzhou I am well aware of 2025 but the majority of the population will not be in high tech." Well, is the majority of the United State's population in high tech then? What's your point?
    2
  10901.  @Andy-P  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Less chance for high value imports then from the western world." China is already the world's largest exporter of high tech goods. Here's a list of countries/regions by high tech exports in 2020. 1. Mainland China ($757 billion) 2. Hong Kong SAR, China ($340 billion) 3. Germany ($182 billion) 4. Korea ($163 billion) 5. Singapore ($160 billion) 6. United States ($141 billion) 7. Japan ($102 billion) 8. Vietnam ($101 billion) 9. Malaysia ($92 billion) 10. Netherlands ($87 billion) ... Source: High-technology exports by country
    2
  10902.  @AQuietNight  The bottom 50% of lower income groups in America have had their standards of living remained unchanged for the past 40 years (source: Prof Kishore Mabubani) then what's you point about the majority of the population of China not being in high tech? There are other products for China to make besides high tech, isn't it?
    2
  10903. If people in Western countries like America, Britain, Europe seem to dislike Middle Eastern refugees (because they dilute the local culture and do not assimilate) why not get your leaders to implement stricter immigration controls, like what China is doing?
    2
  10904. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  10905. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    2
  10906. Taiwan island is an inseparable part of China
    2
  10907. At 3:17 "They had so many TOW missiles that they would use them to kill individual people on the battlefield" I thought that only happens in video games.
    2
  10908. They appear to have plenty of meat hanging in part 1:25 of the video, yet BBC is translating what they said as "we are so poor"?
    2
  10909. Agreed. Moderation represent balance, but seems like in American you have to be either left or right, and this is sowing division among it's people and slowly tearing apart the country from within.
    2
  10910. +brown bobby Who are you to stop me from using Youtube? Are you a Youtube administrator or something?
    2
  10911.  @RobertAmer  I see. I thought that you were referring to the Russian Army conscripting younger men.
    2
  10912.  @medved3027  "And if that's the case then how do you prevent friendly fire?" Your guess is as good as mine. I'm sure Russia has countermeasures against Azov forces using the white armbands against them. "神州 Shenzhou a few conscripts were discovered in the convoys and returned to Russia." Yes, I'm aware of that. It might have been some Russian officer's mistake, because according to Russian law, only professional soldiers are allowed to participate in frontline positions during war time.
    2
  10913.  @takethatwumao1999  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    2
  10914.  @marcusrakyat8891  Coronavirus was still new to medical science, and nobody knew the true extent Covid-19 would wreak upon the world.
    2
  10915.  @sebaslm19  "神州 Shenzhou Tedros is an idiot" Dr Tedros is a doctor and the World Health Organization consists of possibly the best doctors from around the world. I mean, USA is the largest contributor to WHO they contributed $400 million to WHO whereas China contributed only $40 million to WHO, yet Trump says WHO is China biased?
    2
  10916. China's Covid approach is to save lives at the expense of businesses. The United State's Covid approach is to save businesses at the expense of lives.
    2
  10917. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    2
  10918. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  10919. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  10920.  @MarkYeung1  I would say President Xi Jinping in 2021 has grown much more competent since 2011. Sadly, President Joe Biden in 2021 has grown less competent since 2011.
    2
  10921. +Desham Pravesh If India wants NSG so bad, then why not sign Non-Proliferation Treaty first? If you claim uranium will run out 40 years time, and thorium is the new uranium, then why does India want to enter in NSG in first place, when it has thorium like you claim? Like I said, beside China, other countries also oppose India's entry into NSG like New Zealand, Ireland and Austria. You need full approval of all 48 countries to join NSG. China wants to make Asia strong, by building infrastructure and roads in Pakistan, Kazakhstan, other -stan countries, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh and even in South African countries like Angola, Nigeria, Djibouti. But Indian government is constantly opposing Chinese road construction and obstructing Asia's growth.
    2
  10922. If the U.S succeeds in transferring TSMC chip-making technology from Taiwan island to Arizona, then doesn't this mean that the island is of no further use? What chip alliance with Taiwan is there to talk about if the U.S gains the ability to manufacture their own high-end chips?
    2
  10923. +Paul Adonia Which such studies? It's not just about raising the kid right alone, but in China the kids will inevitably be made fun of by other kids in school for coming from a gay family. Also depending on the gender of the child and the family, how would you expect a son to have a father figure in a lesbian family or for a daughter to have motherly role model in all men family? I don't know how much you know about raising kids, but in general, kids need both a father figure and a mother. Furthermore, nobody in such a gay family is linked by blood at all, and the kids are all adopted. What makes you think that water is thicker than blood?
    2
  10924. The Guillotine I mostly agree with you. It's up to Western countries if they want to erode their own societal values and to redefine the family unit altogether. But China should not be under pressure to reform our values, simply because Westerners do so. Young children too are the ones most susceptible to being influenced by the wrong parties or role models. As for homosexuality being a mental or genetic disease, there exists a possibility that it is such. There are cases of people functioning as ordinary citizen of society even while suffering from minor mental illness. If the problem turns out to be genetic, then perhaps in the future, scientists will be able to correct it genetically, as already many scientists are experimenting with curing genetic diseases through gene manipulation.
    2
  10925. +Jennifer Lee Firstly, in an adopted straight family, the orphan will already know (once he's told) that his parents aren't his true blood parents. Even in a real family, with a child who grew up without father (an unmarried mother for example) will already face immense societal pressure (from his classmates, etc) What makes you think growing up in a gay family will not stress the child? Are you the one growing up with gay parents here? Why is it a person jumping off a cliff, is not an "irrational demand", according to what you said? The person making such statement could be mentally ill, and people who try to restrain him are considered "bullying" him? Who are you to make judgements and joke about this issue here? Your beliefs are your own, and China's societal beliefs are ours. Its your choice if you choose to allow a person to jump off the cliff, because you people believe in "rights of the individual" over the rights of society. I mean, in USA, they have freedom to bear firearms like guns, and because of this, robbing a bank is much easier, due to availability of guns, so why should China strive towards "individual rights" over that of society? Your study of trans bathroom laws applies only to USA. How accurate will they be when they are applied to China? China has about 5 times more people (in fact, China is world's most populous country) than America, so would such a study be representative of China, if trans toilets were implemented in China? You said 70% of people were harassed in toilets, which is bad, but imagined if perverts decide to exploit a loophole in trans gender toilets. Such loopholes may not be obvious at first, until they are discovered. More laws, only means more chances for loopholes, in my opinion. Like I said, why should China accept LGBT as equals to heterosexuals? Because US does it? You say it doesn't change the lives of ordinary people? Then what about families wanting their gay son to carry on the family line by producing an heir? You don't know anything about China, but presume to impose your views on us?
    2
  10926. The way you argue is similar to those of SJWs. They don't really care about the issue at hand, but they want to "feel good" so they argue without caring about the consequences, so that they can feel good about themselves all. They have poor understanding of real world problems, but think they understand exactly how the world works. You may be ethnic Chinese, but your mindset isn't "Chinese". Chinese people have a name for this sort or people, which is "White Left" 白左 because you behave exactly like the extreme leftists. 你这白左已经被西方媒体绑架了。 你去管自己国家的事，不要多管中国闲事。
    2
  10927. When these people get married, they cannot biologically carry on the blood line (at least with current technology level) so isn't that considered ancestral suicide, akin to jumping off a cliff? Why is it considered bullying for restrain such people? Orphans can't be choosers. They have such tragic circumstances, yet why should they be subject to further pressure growing up under such family? What about their school life, classmate teasing, and what if their future girlfriend or boyfriend think of their family when they grow up? You weren't raised in such a family, so how do you know what they are going through? Since you understand China is more conservative in general, then what's wrong taking a conservative approach towards implementing such laws? There is no urgent need to implement such law, and it only benefits a small majority of trans people, while possibly exposing more exploitation? And there ARE cases of trans bathroom exploitation that you are simply unaware of. -The University of Toronto changing its policy on gender neutral bathrooms after male students within the University’s Whitney Hall student residence were caught holding their cellphones over female students’ shower stalls and filming them as they showered. -A biological man, Christopher Hambrook, 37, claimed to be ‘trans’ so as to gain access to and prey on women at two Toronto shelters was jailed ‘indefinitely’ -A man who wore a wig and women’s clothing to disguise himself as he allegedly used a concealed camera to record “hours” of video of women in a Los Angeles-area department store restroom.” Source: nobathroombill com/examples
    2
  10928. Energy infrastructure have a dual use for both civilian as well as military purposes, so is taking them out considered a crime? If so, then shouldn't Germany look into who was behind the Nordstream pipeline attack? Awarding winning journalist Seymour Hersh wrote an enlightening report on Nordstream.
    2
  10929. Russia agreed to the Ukraine grain deal, only if EU promised to allow Russia to export their own grain to feed the rest of the world. But EU is not allowing Russia to export grain, meanwhile Ukrainian grain is reaching the EU (not the rest of the world) and creating protests among EU farmers.
    2
  10930.  @jtf873  So have you spoken to Chinese mainlanders in your country then? Before 2019, China was the largest source of tourists, and everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands. Even in terms of international students, China is the largest source of international students, visiting Western schools and universities where they learn the same topics as their local peers. Have you spoken to Russians, North Koreans and Iranians too?
    2
  10931. Only 3 nations have flown full-size stealth combat aircraft and they are the United States (in 1977), Russia (in 2010) and China (in 2011). Today, USA and China are only two nations fielding stealth aircraft in our airforce en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stealth_aircraft Only 3 nations have demonstrated the capability to take out a satellite in orbit using ground-based weapons and they are USA, Russia and China. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-satellite_weapon There are also 3 nations that are developing advanced hypersonic cruise missiles that fly 5 times the speed of sound and is said to overwhelm a country's defenses before they can respond.
    2
  10932. United States: "We will be boycotting the 2022 Beijing Olympics." Other 5 Eyes countries: "Us too!" United States: "SIKE! We will be sending 18 officials to attend the Olympics!" Other 5 Eyes: "Wait…what? How are we going to explain our boycott to Beijing now? Why are we even following the US anyway?"
    2
  10933.  @joincoffee9383  Taiwan used to be one of Four Asian Tigers but since democracy was introduced to Taiwan, it's economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving for jobs in the mainland or Singapore "From the '90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreements on policy matters. This produced less effective policy making. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be more conservative in Taiwan, so they do not enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou, Research Fellow, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica Source: YouTube:How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents | Insight | CNA Insider
    2
  10934. Many Westerners (not all) believe that their countries are democratic, just because they get to cast their votes during elections. But if Western governments aren't able to deliver what the people want, then this is just procedural democracy (i.e where people follow through the motions of democracy, so they automatically assume that they are democratic).
    2
  10935. +Crab Synth There is some truth to what you say. Indeed, poor families tend to have more kids as a safety basket to ensure that at least one of them makes it to adulthood. But at the same time, it means more mouths to feed and more resources spent, which could have been more efficiently spent. In an ideal world, all of those maid's 11 kids should be able to survive to adulthood and contribute to the country's progress. But often, that is not the case, and the vicious cycle of poverty, having more kids and then child malnutrition begins to take its toll on the government. And it would take massive change in mindset (and great risk) for a poor family to invest in a single child, that's true too.
    2
  10936. Good News, Gonzalo Lira is alive and well. Video:youtu.be/R2yeSOcNlgE
    2
  10937. Peng Shuai is trying to lay low and avoid the public eye for a while until this all blows over, and she has expressed her desire for personal privacy during a video call with IOC. But the WTA is trying to pry into her personal affairs and demanding she appear in public and bare her private life for all the world to see.
    2
  10938. It's a combination of the “Red Scare” (fear of communism) and the “Yellow Peril” (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today.
    2
  10939. ROC claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, etc) as part of its territory. In addition to all of mainland China, ROC also claims territory forming part of modern day Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. So why can't China claim Taiwan as part of our territory
    2
  10940.  @Balconetti  I'm glad that you've understood my analogy and agreed that the wife has to protect her security interests. Likewise, Russia has to protect its security interests and Putin had asked for reassurances that NATO would not expand eastward (i.e that Ukraine will not be allowed to join NATO). In fact, many NATO countries themselves are reluctant to admit Ukraine into NATO such as Germany and France, yet they were unwilling to put that down in writting to reassure Putin. After realising that Putin's words had fallen on deaf ears for years, Putin finally decided to act.
    2
  10941. China has amphibious assault vehicles like the ZTD-05 (VN18) said to be world's fastest amphibious assault vehicle, able to attain sailing speeds of up to 30kmph, which is the fastest of it's kind. Video: Chinese firm built 'fastest' amphibious assault vehicle youtu.be/4rzoWPWbai8 The tracks and wheel can withdraw into the body to reduce water traction and it's max ground speed is 65kmph, with a cannon, a machine gun and 14 people on board. It's engine can produce 1600 horsepower, a figure normally associated with heavy tanks.
    2
  10942.  @zilun  China has inducted the world's first operational anti-ship ballistic missile, a "carrier killer" capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, known as the DF-21D. Video: China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile youtu.be/p-cEunmqXM8 The DF-21D is capable of targeting aircraft carrier strike groups out in the open ocean, from the safety of the land. The DF-21D is launched from land-based mobile launchers and flies high up into the stratosphere, using its advanced maneuverability to avoid interception by anti-missile defenses below, before falling at hypersonic speeds (above Mach 20) The warhead is even capable of terminal guidance, making last minute adjustments to its trajectory just seconds before impact.
    2
  10943. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and Yellow Peril (fear of Asians surpassing the West) mindset that's fueling the anti-China sentiment in the West today.
    2
  10944.  The Snurger  It's your own athletes' loss if your country choose to boycott Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics. More gold medals for China.
    2
  10945.  @richardong1421  Australia may not fit in fully to SE Asia I agree, but it doesn't hurt to learn from SE Asia's example in managing relations with China. Australia has superiority complex yes, but it isn't as powerful militarily nor economically (as USA or EU) yet Australia still looks down on China and tries to be the "US's Deputy Sheriff" in Asia.
    2
  10946.  @richardong1421  It's a combination of the "Red Scare" (fear of communism) and the "Yellow Peril" (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in Australia today. Australia has Anglo-Saxon mindset, so they consider themselves superior (like the superiority complex you mentioned) to even the SE Asian countries like Malaysia and Indonesia, no need to mention China too. Since the 19th century, Westerners have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-liberal democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many Westerners to fathom. Such a future is unimaginable to many Westerners.
    2
  10947.  @richardong1421  Australia is also heavily influenced by USA, even the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) is Australian "think tank" that's literally funded by actual "tank-makers" themselves, the US military-industrial complex (i.e Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon Technologies, Boeing) Their agenda is to spread fear and paranoia towards China, so that countries step up their defence budget and buy more US weapons.
    2
  10948. Japan and South Korea see a high number of suicide cases though.
    2
  10949.  @MarkYeung1  "In fact, on a recent survey, Taiwan was found to be the most democratic country in Asia" In Taiwan's latest elections, Lai Ching-te garnered only 40% of votes, meaning that less than 50% of the Taiwanese voters voted for Lai, so how is this a democracy?
    2
  10950.  @kcg7861  The CEOs of Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple were asked by lawmakers if they believed China steals technology from US companies. 3 out of 4 answered no, only Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook said yes. Video: Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple respond to Congress about whether China steals US technology youtu.be/v6whxZm1ubQ
    2
  10951.  @MNanme1z4xs  And if you are same race as them, then they'll label you as communist party shill.
    2
  10952.  @kcg7861  China applies for more patents than any other country in the world and we also have the world's largest number of granted patents, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators. Patent applications for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (1,542,002 patents) 2. United States (597,141 patents) 3. Japan (313,567 patents) 4. South Korea (209,992 patents) 5. European Patent Office (174,397 patents) 6. Germany (67,898 patents) ... Source: World Intellectual Property Indicators wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Indicators#Patents Patent grants for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (432,147 patents) 2. United States (307,759 patents) 3. Japan (194,525 patents) 4. European Patent Office (127,603 patents) 5. South Korea (119,012 patents) 6. Russian Federation (35,774 patents) ...
    2
  10953.  @kcg7861  China publishes more research papers than any other in the world, over a wide range of topics such as physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences. Countries by published scientific papers in 2016: 1. China (426,165 articles) 2. United States (408,985 articles) 3. India (110,320 articles) 4. Germany (103,122 articles) 5. United Kingdom (97,527 articles) ... Source: List of countries by number of scientific and technical journal articles wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_scientific_and_technical_journal_articles This shows that many Chinese scientist and researchers are making discoveries and publishing their findings, contributing to mankind's scientific advancements.
    2
  10954.  @kcg7861  I showed people this short 3-min stunning footage of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience) Video: 新疆乌鲁木齐灯光秀抖音首发，请安静的看完 youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA
    2
  10955.  @kcg7861  Source: France fights terror with camps for re-education thetimes.co.uk/article/france-fights-terror-with-re-education-camps-plan-7wg9vrrgd France will send radicalised Islamists to re-education centres under a €40 million plan to tackle extremism, which the prime minister says is the biggest threat to the nation since Hitler. The suspects will be taught their patriotic duties and forced to undergo psychological treatment in an attempt to counter jihadist indoctrination.
    2
  10956.  @andrenogueira5058  "神州 Shenzhou Yes, we can see it unfold in Xinjian an Tibet. Nothing like Chinese methods to "decolonize minds" Have you actually been to Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region and Tibet Autonomous Region? The road signs, street signs, shop signs, and even the restaurant menus contain either Uighur language and Tibetan language in their respective settings. In Lhasa for example, there are many religious people spinning "prayer tops" and prayer wheels, and performing full-body kowtows on the ground in worship of their religion.
    2
  10957.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "then you may try to explain why it was done with brute force and under the barrel of a gun." I looked it up and the Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (Chinese: 中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议; Tibetan: བོད་ཞི་བས་བཅིངས་འགྲོལ་འབྱུང་ཐབས་སྐོར་གྱི་གྲོས་མཐུན་དོན་ཚན་བཅུ་བདུན་) in 1951, thus acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there's this legally binding document bearing the Tibetan's signature that affirms Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. (The Seventeen Point Agreement can be found on Wikipedia) You said: "They are far too well documented even prior to Xiananmen massacre." I have never heard of this place called Xiananmen, could you give me the Chinese characters that correspond to this location? And you're saying that a massacre took place in this location?
    2
  10958. Back when China was poor, there was a "brain drain" as local Chinese talent migrated out of China to the USA. Now that China is rising, we are experiencing a "reverse brain drain" where talent migrate from a developed country (like USA) to a developing country (like China). It's a combination of growing opportunities in China as well as anti-Asian sentiment in USA that leads to this phenomena.
    2
  10959. NATO is exhausting all their sanction options and lethal aid sent to Ukraine, kinda like the Hare expended all it's energy before crossing the finish line. Whereas Russia is making slow but tangible progress much like the Tortoise towards the finish line.
    2
  10960. America is full of patriotism, with slogan like "American is the greatest country", "Make America Great Again" or "God Bless the United States of America". If I was American, I would probably swell with pride upon hearing those words too.
    2
  10961. Had the Kremlin really employed so many Russian bots, then Russia won't be losing the Media/Information war (in which the Western/Ukrainian side is winning). But it's winning the real military war that truly counts and in this, Russia is definitely winning. The Info War will be won once the whole narrative that Ukraine is winning finally collapses.
    2
  10962. I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion:Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    2
  10963. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  10964. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its consitutution
    2
  10965. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  10966. Even the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  10967. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  10968. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    2
  10969.  @laserraiset3300  "神州 Shenzhou if china consumer, when who is producer ?" China IS the producer, who else? China is the world's factory after all. China is the world's largest car producer, largest internet population, produces the most electricity in the world, having the world's largest high-speed railway network and so on. What makes you think that China cannot be both the consumer as well as the producer? Most of the world's products are already made in China after all.
    2
  10970.  @laserraiset3300  China is the world’s largest producer of vehicles, manufacturing more than 21.4 million cars and 4.6 million commercial vehicles in 2021 for a total production of just over 26 million vehicles. China has the world's largest internet population so a great deal of the Internet is expected to be shaped by Chinese netizens. Chinese inventions like paper, compass and gunpowder have changed the world, yet it appears that you look down on Chinese inventions?
    2
  10971.  @laserraiset3300  You said: "Just some decades ago america was country with 50% of world's manufacturing before gave millions jobs to starving china, so what china offer to be even close to america ?" Are American workers willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers? If not, then the prices of Made-in-America goods will be more expensive than Made-in-China goods, and those manufacturing jobs aren't going to return to the U.S any time soon. And who's going to buy Made-in-America goods with such a high price tag as compared to Made-in-China?
    2
  10972.  @laserraiset3300  "America is the only major developed society where the average income of the bottom 50 percent has gone down over a 30-year period. By contrast, in the past 40 years the Chinese people have experienced a greater improvement in their standard of living than they have experienced in 4,000 years. So, in terms of domestic spiritual vitality, America is lacking it. China has it." - Kishore Mabubani, Singaporean diplomat and geopolitical consultant.
    2
  10973.  @laserraiset3300  "神州 Shenzhou paper is medieval and relative primitive invention compare to computers," Paper is still widely in use today, which is a testament to the enduring nature of the inventions, compared to computers that only have seen decades of use. More people in the world use paper than drive cars, so how is Chinese invention inferior to Western invention? Even the Paper Banknote is still widely used today, I'm sure everyone uses banknotes, but not everyone in the world drives a car.
    2
  10974.  @laserraiset3300  You keep on claiming that Americans somehow "invented" electricity. But Benjamin Franklin's famous kite experiment made use of a Chinese invention, namely the kite itself, which was invented by Chinese philosophers back in 5th century BC.
    2
  10975.  @MarkYeung1  "The Great Chinese Famine in 1959 to 1961 was considered one of the deadliest man made disasters. The drought was a contributing factor." Man-made in the sense that the local provincial governments grossly exaggerated the crop yields in their reports to Chairman Mao. When Mao Zedong personally visited those fields, the local provincial governments had workers transplant stalks from dying fields into healthy fields whenever Mao walked by, giving off the illusion of a bumper harvest, which is why Mao thought China had surplus grain to export elsewhere. Yet Western scholars lay the blame squarely on Mao, when it was the local provincial governments that deceived him with exaggerated crop yields?
    2
  10976.  @laserraiset3300  You talk about Industrial Revolution, but ancient Chinese metallurgists were the first to discover pig iron, cast iron and wrought iron, long before the Europeans? Ancient Chinese metallurgists also invented the blast furnace, cupola furnace and finery forge, long before their European counterparts did.
    2
  10977. "There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen." — Vladimir I. Lenin.
    2
  10978.  @drmodestoesq  Chinese government is providing free education to Uighurs and training them in skills necessary for the workplace. Otherwise, under Uighur Muslim laws, their children don't go to school, instead they stay home and just read the Koran all day. Then they take over their parent's businesses as kebab sellers by the roadside.
    2
  10979.  Khadr Trudeau  Well, Uighurs in Xinjiang are being taught to love China as their homeland, so that's a big difference between Hawaiian and Uighur children.
    2
  10980.  @dustyeyer3573  Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china), etc, that were in high demand by the rest of the ancient world.
    2
  10981.  Gazi Arian Ahmed  Who says Muslims don't force others to be Muslims? In the Quran, Muslims who leave Islam are traitors and deserve death by stoning, and if non-Muslim have to convert to Islam if they marry a Muslim. China is demolishing mosques while other Western countries like America are having mosques built, like in Spotsylvania County, Virginia for example. Video: youtube.com/watch?v=INy4gaUrCL4
    2
  10982.  @LizardKing360  Here's a short 2 minute video of 11 beautiful Chinese cities at night, and what makes you think China is 3rd world s**thole? (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience) Video: youtube.com/watch?v=G7ZRa-w9xyA
    2
  10983.  XueJian Zhang  You're not helping the Muslims with "kindness and sympathy," you're only letting them have their own way and "remaking" your country to be like theirs. Refugees are fleeing their own conflict-ridden Islamic countries and flooding the Western countries like United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, etc, and they are not adapting to their predominantly Christian host country. Check out this video about Muslims protesting and burning the United Kingdom flag outside UK's main mosque. Video: Protesters burn UK flag outside UK''s main mosque youtube.com/watch?v=uig1nYdZnrA Why let Muslims come to your countries and trample all over your country? China is not letting Muslims have their way in China, they have to learn to put the country 1st and their religion 2nd. They have to put China above God/Allah.
    2
  10984.  @mdi8164  Over 50 years ago, nobody ever expected "communist" China would ever succeed, or that we will play an important role in the world. When the Soviet Union collapse in 1990s, everyone fully expected China to soon follow. But China defied all expectations of failure, and transformed from a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into an economic powerhouse today, the world's factory (Made in China), a growing scientific and technological power, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And its all been achieved under the CCP leadership, the same party that the Western anti-Communist propaganda have been denouncing all this while. Despite their biased predictions of China's failure, China today is very successful under the CCP rule, so why continue to believe the biased Western propaganda?
    2
  10985.  @mdi8164  Western social media platforms are not banned in China, and nobody will arrest you for logging onto Western websites like Facebook, YouTube or Google while in China. Which person has been arrested for doing so? And depending on the type of criticism you post online about the CCP, they might ignore it, or they may take down your post that's all, not "crush" (unless it is very serious) And according to some studies, China sees on average some 500 protests daily. In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass protests to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 protests in 2010 (or an average of 493 protests daily) Have you actually been to China and see what it is like here for yourself? Or do you just believe Western anti-Communist propaganda?
    2
  10986. USA would shoot itself in the bawls just to get rid of a mosquito that landed there.
    2
  10987. +Joe Dirt I have shown real example of Swiss doctors prescribing heroin to help with drug rehabitation, so do you even read my comment at all here? Why blame doctors for simply prescribing medicines that's all? I have shown an example here, whereas you are just posting links to people discussion drug problem that's all, without any actual solid examples here. You just copy other people's texts in order to make your argument seem long and impressive that's all. Where's your substance here? As for marijuana being addictive, there are various studies to show that marijuana addiction is possible and likely. You are just promoting it like those abusers who bluff others into thinking marijuana is not as addictive as it really is. There are so many examples of drug abusers turning to life of crime because of marijuana addiction. Dianne Jones, 45, living in New Orleans in 2014 was unable to pay up a $2,500 bond, only able scrap enough money together only after her daughter sold the family’s television set at a pawnshop for $200. She was a marijuana abuser. There was also fatal police shooting of Keith Lamont Scott last month in Charlotte, N.C. Mr. Scott, 43, had attracted police attention in part because, the police said, he was smoking marijuana. Source: nytimes (dot) com/2016/10/13/us/marijuana-arrests.html
    2
  10988. Westerners stole Arabic numeral systems too.
    2
  10989. In China, the Chinese government controls the Chinese corporations for China's benefit, reining in companies when they strayed too far. In the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S corporations for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    2
  10990.  @MarkYeung1  The 2021 blackouts in China were not cause by Australian coal. A ccording BBC, the blackouts were caused by surge in demand for Chinese goods and the factories making them needed a lot of power. Beijing also imposed rules to make the country carbon neutral by 2060 have led to slower coal production, and the government controlled electricity prices so the coal-fired power plants are unwilling to operate at a loss, so they reduced output. ... Source: BBC: China power cuts: What is causing the country's blackouts? There is no mention of Australian coal being the cause of China's blackouts in that BBC article.
    2
  10991. @Xi The Poo What makes you think Hong Kong will be great if CCP falls? China is currently the world's 2nd largest economy, so CCP's collapse would send economic shock waves throughout world markets and possibly result in global recession as Chinese investments dry up and Chinese companies close down and fire their employees. Hong Kong will definitely be adversely affected by CCP's fall and so will the global economy.
    2
  10992.  @cchannel7857  Cyrus said in his email that he's been very busy lately and that's why he had a late response to CGTN's proposal. So it's possible that he was too busy at that time to work out payment details and that's why the payment discussion was delayed. It's not uncommon for payment details to be worked out later after the business transaction occurred, so what are you trying to say?
    2
  10993.  JustEnd  Why don't you show me a proper article saying that YouTube is banned in China?
    2
  10994. ​ @ronnylim7907  Omega may the last letter of the Greek alphabet, but the coronavirus mutations have no limit, so they might even evolve beyond an theoretical Omega variant.
    2
  10995.  PTP120122  I have demonstrated English proficiency, why would I need to be paid to post comments here? Instead of making assertions about me, why don't you attempt to refute my points?
    2
  10996.  @jklok  If you want to talk about imprisonment, then it's America that has the largest prison incarceration rate in the world, and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate
    2
  10997.  @new-york-city  You are not American, then why did you assume Z Z is Chinese?
    2
  10998.  @tekboi1984  You said that "there's evidence to back up our fears"? Well, where are all the Uighur refugees then? There's Ukrainian refugees and Palestinian refugees (even Rohingya refugees from Myanmar). But where are all the Uighur refugees, if there's evidence to back up your fears?
    2
  10999.  @Joe-ul3gh  The Russian currency is the best performing currency this year and Russia is raking in record profits from sales of oil and gas to India, China and other countries apart from the West. There's plenty of Russian energy to power their manufacturing industry, whereas Europe is expected to ration energy this winter, how are they going to keep up their manufacturing capabilities?
    2
  11000.  @Joe-ul3gh  Because the Russian currency is backed by commodities like Russian gas, wheat, fertilizer, and so on, that's why the Russian currency is the best performing currency this year.
    2
  11001.  @xxxzz8413  said "神州 Shenzhou Dude 5$ is all i need to search for counter studies. Give me that & i will provide news" It's a deal then. Can you post your bank account details here so that I can wire you the money? Perhaps give me all your alternative bank account numbers, just in case the money fails to pull through.
    2
  11002.  @V01DIORE  (literally threatening nuclear attacks against non-nuclear-armed nations in their national newspaper, directly controlled by the government) If Australia wants to buy nuclear submarines from America, then it's taking one step in the direction of becoming a nuclear-armed nation, then it might become a possible target for nuclear strikes. I mean, just don't buy nuclear subs, if you don't want to become the potential target of nukes.
    2
  11003. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  11004. +Alex Lee Why should WTO be based on whether a country is democratic or not? WTO should be available for all countries to join, regardless of whichever form of government they choose, so why is China not allowed to join WTO when it was first founded? Instead, China had to agree to unfair and harsher conditions imposed on China by USA and its allies? Even now, China is supposed to be treated as a market economy, as per our agreement in joining WTO, but the USA is not acknowledging China as market economy. Look at the USA imposing tariffs on steel and aluminum on China, look at USA imposing sanctions on North Korea nuclear test, look at USA imposing sanctions on Russia for its annexation of Crimea, look at USA imposing sanctions on Iran Nuclear Deal. Did you know that the USA is actually the world's most "protectionist" country in the world? Who is the one constantly throwing out sanctions and disregarding the WTO rules? There have been over 100+ complaints lodged against the USA because of its protectionist measures, and even countries like Canada, Australia and India are lodging fresh complaints about US tariffs on steel and aluminum.
    2
  11005. +Alex Lee That was not what China agreed upon. One of the verse was that China would be granted market economy status after 15 years from which China joined the WTO, which was in 2001. Its already 2018, yet why isn't USA treating China like a market economy? Here is the actual verse from Article 15 of China’s WTO accession agreement: Once China has established, under the national law of the importing WTO Member, that it is a market economy, the provisions of subparagraph (a) shall be terminated provided that the importing Member’s national law contains market economy criteria as of the date of accession. In any event, the provisions of subparagraph (a)(ii) shall expire 15 years after the date of accession. China has not been ungrateful to USA. China even help buy off about $1.2 trillion dollars (as of January 2018) of US debt, in order to help USA tide over the 2008 financial crisis, so you think USA would be able to recover if not for Chinese buying off their debt? And the USA IS the most protectionist country in the world. According to the following source, since 2008, USA has implemented 800 of such "protectionist" measures, as compared to China's 200-300 of such measures. Even European countries like France, Germany, UK, etc have over 300 of such policies. Source:Protectionist measures taken 2008–2013 according to Global Trade Alert wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Protectionist_measures_taken_2008–2013_according_to_Global_Trade_Alert.png
    2
  11006. Alex Lee Then who asked US companies to invest in China? Your companies come to China and set up shop, then still complain about trade deficit or intellectual property rights infringement? This is how I see it: ======================== USA: We need access to your markets and your manpower, so that we can make American products at competitive prices to our competitors. China: Great Idea, but we'll need access to your product blueprints and you'll have to obey our laws in China. USA: Done!. =======================
    2
  11007. You should look at what's the trigger, and it's clearly the U.S sending officials to visit Taiwan that's inflaming tensions in the Taiwan Strait, yet you're claiming it's China that's aggressive?
    2
  11008. If a lie gets repeated long enough, the lie gets to thinking it Israel.
    2
  11009.  @SuperJustice47  That would be falling into the same trap that's afflicting Iran.
    2
  11010.  @topherno  Contrary to popular opinion, China does not have a vaccine mandate, which probably a reason why some elderly refuse to vaccine either out of medical conditions, or simply because of fear of vaccines. Senior Chinese health officials are urging the elderly to get vaccinated after the latest wave in Hong Kong. "The outbreak in Hong Kong is a particularly profound lesson for us, an example that if the vaccination rate for the elderly is low, the rate of severe cases and deaths will be high," Wang Hesheng, deputy director of the National Health Commission, told a news briefing.
    2
  11011. ... and print more dollars to support more wars. This is the endless cycles of manufacturing wars and manufacturing dollars.
    2
  11012. I know I posted this before about how events led up till the situation today, but it bears repeating this posts taken off Weibo: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy taken off Weibo helps puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    2
  11013.  @Joeyknows924  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, back when the Mongols conquered both the Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China, and then incorporated those territories into Yuan Dynasty China (1200 AD). Centuries later, the Manchurian conquerors also made Tibet part of the Qing Dynasty China (1600 AD). Tibet broke free of China in 1912, but was eventually reunited with the mainland by 1951. Today, countries all over the world recognize Tibet Autonomous Region as part of the People's Republic of China.
    2
  11014.  @CJ-Fortes_Atque_Fidelis  "Shenzhou. do you think Hamas and Palestinians can be reeducated?" China has succeeded with the Uighurs militants in Xinjiang, so I wouldn't say it's completely impossible to do the same for Hamas.
    2
  11015.  @smitsos1  China has outlawed the more extremist versions of Salafism and Wahhabism. But for the most part most Muslims in China are permitted to practice their religion as long as they register themselves with the proper authorities. China is fundamentally an atheist country under the communist party, and that's why the Chinese government is placed above all forms of religion. Also, the Uighurs born in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth, and so they learn Mandarin (the national language of China), Chinese history, and since China is an atheist country, some of them may choose to become atheist. It's just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American citizens by birth and they learn English, American history and whatever religion they promote.
    2
  11016.  @hugok3340  China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    2
  11017. About low birth rates and an aging population, perhaps technology can help offset the shortage of births and excess of elderly? Robotic caregivers and smart devices could one day, help to ease the burden of taking care of the elderly in China.
    2
  11018. Countries often race to be the first to establish foundations in emerging technologies. Much like how Microsoft Windows OS dominates most computer systems before Apple iOS and other systems that came later. Perhaps 5G and 6G is on the same path.
    2
  11019.  @wmchan44  As with every new technology, there needs to be trial and error to determine which standards suit which countries best. Also, the danger in having everything standardized, is that if war breaks out where 6G is employed, having the same 6G standard can grant another country easier access into another country's sovereign 6G space. That's how the U.S employ social media like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter to control another country's cyberspace and wreak havoc in their systems. That's one reason why different countries tend to use different ammunition calibers in their military, so that their enemies can't make use of them.
    2
  11020.  @angelaz4818  Well said, even an Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    2
  11021.  @jsdev4454  Japanese TV report sparks speculations in China that COVID-19 may have originated in US en.people.cn/n3/2020/0223/c90000-9661026.html A report from a Japanese TV station that suspected some of the 14,000 Americans died of influenza may have unknowningly contracted the coronavirus has gone viral on Chinese social media, stoking fears and speculations in China that the novel coronavirus may have originated in the US. The report, by TV Asahi Corporation of Japan, suggested that the US government may have failed to grasp how rampant the virus have gone on the US soil.
    2
  11022. There is an American fugitive on the run, whistleblower Edward Snowden (founder of Wikileaks) that is wanted for exposing the fact that US government tap privates lines in order to listen in on US citizen conversations.
    2
  11023. pronuke spontaneous No matter what she does, the Hong Kong protestors aren't going to like it. Look, Carrie Lam announced the formal withdrawal of the Hong Kong extradition bill, yet the Hong Kong protestors still continue. Carrie Lam has stated that she is open to dialogue but the protestors aren't, and they don't want to talk. Therefore, Hong Kong government needs to start resorting to a more authoritarian approach, no matter how unhappy it makes everyone.
    2
  11024. The Duran is a great source of geopolitical knowledge, but they are inexperienced when it comes to China. While I admire Alexander Mercouris greatly, I was astonished to learn that he still considers Taiwan a country, despite the fact that the island is part of China.
    2
  11025.  @davidg.3406  "神州 Shenzhou he is british , so does his point of view " Well, Cyrus Janssen is American, yet his point of view is vastly different. Brian Berletic at the New Atlas is also American yet his view is vastly different. So I don't think using a person's nationality alone is sufficient reason.
    2
  11026. Sadly, many Western audiences have been fed anti-China propaganda, until they harbour negative opinion about our country, even though they haven't set foot in China and see what life is like here for themselves.
    2
  11027. +In Trance Building roads automatically equals aggression? Bhutan and China also have treaty to respect current status quo of our boundaries. Doklam/Donglong was under Chinese control long ago, but claimed by Bhutan, and is still currently under Chinese control. So where is the aggression at all? Lastly, India is the one sending its troops into Chinese territory. Normally sending your troops into another country uninvited is grounds for an act of war. So who is the aggressor here?
    2
  11028. +deviantnish Chinese civilization is 5000 years old and we have maps to back up our claims. Who are Indians to decide to interfere? Does India claim Donglong region as part of India? Does India have any proof of its claims then? If not, then why interfere in bilateral affair between Bhutan and India? We have 1890s treaty to back up our claim, so why mock our claims when you don't have any of your own?
    2
  11029. +BlackfireVatsal Bhutan does not even maintain diplomatic relations with any of UNSC permanent members (USA, UK, France, Russia, China) according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_relations_of_Bhutan So what gives Bhutan the right to claim Chinese territory as within their borders?
    2
  11030. US warns China against sending military aid to Russia, yet USA continues to send military aid to Ukraine.
    2
  11031. Justin Watson Your mindset is probably similar to those US soldiers who enlisted in the military back during the Iraq War, Afghan War, etc, thinking that USA's military might will make short work of the enemy. But fastforward 15 years later, and the war is still not won, and the soldiers' kids back home have probably grown up in that time frame.
    2
  11032.  @sayhellotopigeon3083  The bat soup coronavirus origins myth have long been debunked by experts. Source: No, Coronavirus Was Not Caused by 'Bat Soup'–But Here's What Researchers Think May Be to Blame health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/coronavirus-bat-soup
    2
  11033. @Red Disaster He's a property tycoon as well as a member of the Communist Party of China, so why would CPC make him disappear?
    2
  11034.  @MetalheadAndNerd  Where's your evidence that he has disappeared? He's a prominent member of the Communist Party of China and billionaire property tycoon, yet you're just claiming his disappeared just like that?
    2
  11035.  @MetalheadAndNerd  So what's going to happen to all his assets then? What's going to happen to his company employees? You just believe the news that's presented to you just like that?
    2
  11036.  @Notorious_biggest  His friends are unable to contact him, isn't proof that he's missing.
    2
  11037. The United States is not only trying to prevent China's rise through South East Asia, but also targeting Russia in Europe, by supporting NATO and Ukraine against Russia.
    2
  11038. America's problems didn't just appeared overnight, and you can't just blame Trump for inheriting problems created by previous US presidents. A ballooning trade deficit takes time to grow to its current size today, and previous POTUS have refused to address the issue before it grows out of hand, because their leadership is short-term and they only plan for 4-8 years and leave the biggest problems for the next election to fix. On the other hand, China's leadership is expected to remain in long term, so they plan for the future, up to 30 years ahead, and address issues quickly before they grow out of hand.
    2
  11039.  @yslee1401  According to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty; China's poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015. Of course this is still not enough and China's poverty alleviation efforts are still ongoing until everyone in China is lifted out of poverty.
    2
  11040.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "In Western systems - democracies, that is - this separation is protected by the constitution and actually works." We are witnessing the breakdown of such a system, especially with regards to the new landmark abortion ruling (Roe v. Wade decision) by the Supreme court overturning abortion rights, that has resulted in mass protests across the United States. Other issues like demands for stricter gun control aren't being met either. You said: "These campaigns are in fact purges - ordered by one leader - and generally serve the leader's own power agenda." Do you have actual evidence of your claims? Xi had vowed to crack down on "tigers and flies", that is, high-level officials and local civil servants alike. Many ordinary Chinese have benefited from the corruption crackdown which targeted officials accepting bribes and abuse of power. You said: "At best they eliminate the dear-leader's opposition. A good example of this can be seen in Russia, where the local dear-leader imprison his political adversaries on corruption charges while being the most corrupt of them all. Mao did the exact same thing, and Xi is no different in this regard." I don't understand why are you using Russia to compare with China's anti-corruption campaign? What's your logic? Also do you have evidence that Chairman Mao was "the most corrupt of them all" and that Xi is no different? From what I can tell, President Xi Jinping has one of the world's lowest salaries (for a world leader) at just $22,000 annually. Even Indian PM Narendra Modi draws a higher annual salary of $30,000 compared to Xi.
    2
  11041.  @ignatiuschua5268  Is it true that a Singaporean activist (Jolovan Wham) who simply held up a placard with a smiley face ":-)" in front of a police station was arrested by the police in Singapore?
    2
  11042. USA will win for sure.
    2
  11043. Ruata Lungchuang To both North and South Koreas viewpoint, they are still one country, not two separate countries. Korea was single unified country during Joseon dynasty, but was divided into North Korea and South Korea after Japanese surrender. Any war by them would be considered a civil war within a single country. and should not have any foreign intervention. If not, they may also to be sign a peace treaty to become two separate countries. What do you know about what Chinese citizens think? We are closest nation to N. Korea, so we can understand their views. It has been revealed that N. Korea tried to secretly meet with USA in 2016 to sign peace treaty, but failed. There is no formal peace treaty after Korean war, so how is North Korea going to normalise itself, if it is technically still at war with USA, and the war can resume anytime?
    2
  11044. Ruata Lungchuang So what is the best solution then? That both North and South Korea become two separate countries? If that's the case, then a new treaty has to be drafted and North Korea has tried to approach USA for terms of peace, but USA keeps rejecting it. Everyone knows that if North Korea ever attacked USA, it will be annihilated by it. Even China will destroy North Korea if it made the first move. So why not USA sign peace treaty with N. Korea then? When did I ever said that the DMZ will be decommissioned? What do know about how South Koreans feel about N. Korea? Many S. Koreans have families and relatives living in N. Korea so who is to say how they feel about reunification? Only the new generation of S. Koreans grew up without knowledge of a former unified Korea, so they lack a sense of kinship with N. Korea. China supports N. Korea because remember that it is nuclear capable state and we don't want push N. Korea over the edge and for war to break out in East Asia. China's sanctions on N. Korea are judged to what we deem as necessary and not to the point that war will erupt. What do you know about Chinese efforts to open up N. Korea? China built a bridge that extends to N. Korea in hopes of opening up its market but N. Korea refuses to accept it, and the bridge doesn't extend to reach N. Korea soil. Chinese officials even once invited Kim Jong Il (previous NK leader) to Liaoning province to display China's progress and woo him to open up his markets, but he refused. You think China can just control NK as we like? China doesn't have any military bases in NK, but USA has many bases in SK, so who are you to compare China with USA? But USA does not care about peace and constantly pressurised N. Korea into possible war. USA keeps sending warships and aircraft carrier battlegroup to East Asia to provoke China and NK. This place is our home, not USA's yet USA keeps taking provocative actions instead of peaceful ones. If war breaks out in Asia, it will be Chinese, Japanese and Koreans that will be dying, not so much USA people, so who are you to judge Chinese people on our views? We are the ones living here in East Asia so we have a stake in its continued peace.
    2
  11045. +Ruata Lungchuang China does not have military bases in North Korea, and N. Korea needs strong a military since it is technically still at war with USA. It is N. Korea who chooses to militarize, not because of Chinese backing. The government has mentioned many times that N. Korea is not under Chinese control and its reckless actions are its own decisions. North Korea was product of Soviet Union (just like Communist China from Marxism) and South Korea was product of USA. N, Korea tried to unify Korea again after the humiliating division, and almost succeeded (90% unified) but USA declared war on N. Korea and pushed them back past 38 parallel to China's border (Liaoning province) Reluctantly, China joined in Korean war to prevent USA from controlling entire Korea. You can see from this, that N. Koreans feel that USA declared war on them, even when technically, it was internal civil war within Korea, and should not have foreign intervention. China only joined in Korean war because USA joined it, and Chinese forces did not push past 38 parallel in to S. Korean territory. No peace treaty has been signed, so how is N. Korea ever going to attract foreign investment and normalize itself? So you can talk about your own opinions and Chinese people's hypocrisy, but I can't give my own views? I don't mock or insult you, so why do you look down on Chinese people not being aware of the reality? Like I said, we are the ones living here in East Asia, and we have the most to lose if war breaks out in East Asia. East Asia has been peaceful past 30 or so years and there have been much progress, with developing economies in S. Korea, Japan and China (and Taiwan). All of these countries will be affected if war breaks out in Korean peninsula.
    2
  11046. China ranks top in the world in reading, science and mathematics according to PISA.
    2
  11047. American MSM focus on other countries only if it's of interest to the rich US corporations agenda.
    2
  11048.  @yslee1401  But Meng Wanzhou is on Canadian soil, not American soil, and Meng did not break any Canadian laws while in Canada.
    2
  11049.  @blitz12399  "The US wasn’t arming Ukraine, If they were Ukraine would have been better equipped." Since you like to bring up alternative examples from out of nowhere, then isn't the U.S arming Taiwan by selling weapons to the island?
    2
  11050.  @andiye6019  The Diaoyu Islands were historically part of China until the Japanese invaded and occupied it during the First Sino-Japanese War in early 1895, between the Qing dynasty of China and the Empire of Japan. After the Japanese surrendered at the end of WWII, Japan signed an agreement to relinquish all previously occupied lands, yet why wasn't Diaoyu Islands returned back to its original owner?
    2
  11051.  @rufanuf1  You said: "As it grows rich from joining in global capitalism will it use it's wealth for good or for bad?" China is using our newfound wealth for peaceful purposes, such as building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, ports, airports,_ etc in other developing countries. The Belt and Road Initiative is a prime example of China's various infrastructure projects located across the global. You said: "It seems mostly right now China's rulers wish to spit in the face of those that supported its rise back onto the global stage." How so? Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, etc, cheap and affordable to Americans. Think about the billions of dollars that Americans have saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to the affordability of Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursuits, like cars, housing, luxury brands, or necessities like rent, hospital bills, etc. Isn't that the reason why so many Americans often flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money? How is this "spitting in the face of those that supported it"?
    2
  11052.  @rufanuf1  You said: "It's likely China will become isolated once again a bit like N Korea, and now it seems Russia. Either that or it will go for global domination," Seems like at this point, you're just projecting negative outcomes of China onto the future that's all, without any basis in reality. Right now, China is opening up, our industrial factories are restarting, and shipments of Chinese goods are resuming. Chinese tourists are packing our bags, and Chinese international students are planning to resume their studies overseas, then how is China being isolated? Decoupling at this point between China and the West is virtually impossible at this point. As for global domination, my gosh, where ever did you ever get such an idea? Where in China's 5,000 years of history has global domination ever been in mind? The irony is that you've established earlier that it is Western (and particularly the US) that domination exists, yet you somehow project on to China what the US is doing?
    2
  11053.  @rufanuf1  "神州 Shenzhou That's a long post to make a "snide" remark," Look, you've been making derogatory remarks against me, claiming my perception of global reality is flawed, and that I'm revealing my ignorance, among other such insults. Why? Just because my views happen to differ from yours? I've cited numerous examples to illustrate my point, whereas you've not data to support yours. You just seemingly make claims without bothering to support them with evidence. You said: "However humanity and civilization was not built during the measly "5000 years" of Chinese accumulated "political experience"." China's 5,000 years of history is not enough? Then what on Earth makes you think 200 years of American history is enough to build humanity and civilization? What sort of double standards is this? You're only taking into account the past 100-200 years of human history, and ignoring the past 1000-2000 years of human history? Then you're being somewhat myopic in the sense that you're only looking at events short-term, instead of long-term. You said: "The US has barely no history at all! (And NO I am not American) But they have done more to lift the world out of poverty in the last 200 years than any other nation on Earth including helping China along the way!" Again, where's your data? According to the World Bank, China's poverty alleviation efforts have resulted in an unprecedented number of people being lifted out of poverty . And you're not even American yourself, yet you keep on singing their praises while ignoring their negative outcomes.
    2
  11054.  @rufanuf1  "神州 Shenzhou Sorry not only have you NOT proved any of my statements wrong." I already did. Especially that statement of yours that "the mindset of communism, which has demonstrated itself to limit innovation and creativity throughout human history" has been proven wrong with the Soviet launch of Sputnik. You said: "Do you honestly think someone should retort to your academia with more academia of their own to contest your defense of your political point?" Then honestly speaking what else do you respond with? You respond to my acadamia with more of your insults and derogatory remarks against me for my views, even though I've cited sources to substantiate my points where possible You said: "I use broad statements because they are my broad real life experiences of nearly 60 years and those experiences define my point of view," Pray tell, have you actually been to Russia or China and experienced life here for yourself?
    2
  11055.  @rufanuf1  You said: "Having a good grasp on history is fine, but it's of little use in a political debate, yet that is the method your trying to use" Arguably, there is no greater teacher than history itself. History shows us what works, what didn't and what mistakes were made. If we look at the political systems of human societies for the past 1000-2000 years, virtually all of them gravitated towards an authoritarian form, where political power is concentrated in the nobles (aristocracy), priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy). Western-style democracy actually has a history of failure, and Athens, Sparta and Greece had early forms of democracy that weren't successful. Democracy itself wasn't even popular outside of Greece, and didn't spread throughout the rest of the ancient world (whom preferred authoritarian forms of governance). Modern Liberal Democracy is a different breed from ancient democracies, but this means that it only has 100-200 years of history, and hasn't undergone the test of time, unlike say, China's 5,000 years of strong central government rule. You said: "In many ways I am demonstrating to you that the upbringing of someone in a western democracy allows us to have an opinion beyond what our schools or textbooks teach us." If that's really the case, then why is it you are unable to accept the fact that China is doing well under a non-Western democratic government such as the Chinese government? I thought you should be able to accept different points of views, yet you seem unable to accept my view (which obviously differs from yours)? You said: "Reciting facts is not creative, its closer to "indoctrinated"." Reciting facts is citing scientific proof which can be verified.
    2
  11056.  @rufanuf1  You said: "Have you ever considered to challenge your own beliefs? Are you self reflective enough?" You're describing the fundamental Marxist philosophy of Dialectical Materialism. Karl Marx believed that for every argument (or thesis) is there is an opposing dialectical counter-argument (or antithesis) and the two will combine to form a new argument (a synthesis). Materialism _is the belief that our surroundings shape our ideas, and its the opposite of _Idealism (which is the belief that ideas shape our environment). So Dialectical Materialism is the pitting of arguments against counterarguments using facts gleamed from the environment, not from ideas. "Remember I am only telling you what I see with my eyes. Prove me wrong...show me you have a thought process that goes beyond your ability to read." Then tell me, what do you see with your eyes? It's apparent from your snide remarks that you don't consider me an equal, then all information that I've presented will amount to nothing if your mind refuses to listen.
    2
  11057.  @rufanuf1  You said: "At one point I even said you seemed to almost show some humility (I think now I was wrong)." I was being humble, but when you kept on hurling derogatory remarks against me for my views, and making ad hominen fallacies (i.e attacking me personally, instead of attacking my points) then why should I continue to be humble in the face of such snide remarks? If you don't respect someone, why should you expect to be shown respect in return? You said: "Correct China is not a free market and the world is slowly waking up to that fact." China never claimed to follow the principles of a free market economy, it's people like you who claim China copied the Western business model, when this is clearly not the case. In fact, the West claims to follow free market principles, yet NATO countries are imposing a price cap on Russian oil, instead of letting market forces determine the price of oil, then who is the one going against their own principles here? You said: "The CCP are basically taking all the vulnerability's in the western model and trying to exploit them to gain power." Well, then shouldn't the West focus on patching up those vulnerabilities, instead of singling out China? China never even proclaimed to follow the Western model in the first place, it's your Western countries that chose this model.
    2
  11058.  @rufanuf1  Excuse me, but what's wrong with sharing a holiday resort with 50 Russians? Aren't Russians people as well? Or are you implying that you should have the whole resort to yourself? And what's wrong with Chinese spitting contests held all over the world? I thought you were all about freedoms yet why is it when Chinese people do things, you take offense against us? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for study, work and play. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending coin on your tourist industry. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. Yet what makes you think Chinese people aren't free, or are suppressed under the government?
    2
  11059.  @rufanuf1  I'm being as humble as can be. For example, I've never resorted to hurling derogatory remarks against you for your views, but you've responded with personal insults, attacking me personally instead of attacking my views. I've also noticed that in your other posts to others on this comment thread, you made numerous snide comments against them as well. You keep on painting China as being against the West, but China today is currently at peace and not at war with any countries. Instead of making war upon others, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, etc in other developing countries. Whereas the US has been involved in Iraq War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Yemen War, even in the 21st century, yet you're saying China can't be responsible with our new found power?
    2
  11060.  @rufanuf1  While it's true that empires may entropy and decay throughout human history, the next form of government often follows the same authoritarian form of governance as in previous forms. Democracy was never actually popular in the ancient world outside of Greece. Even when peasants overthrew kings, oftentimes, they simply put another king in power, rather than grant democracy and voting rights to the vast majority of people. It's because history has shown such authoritarian systems to be stable if those in power are able to rule competently. And mind you, many of these authoritarian empires lead long lives, spanning at least a century or more. Here's some examples: Akkadian Empire (180 years), Armenian Empire (618 years), Babylonian Empire (1166 years), British Empire (300+ years), Egyptian Empire (473 years), etc. Therefore, I find it unrealistic to equate only the past 200 years of Western Democracy as somehow being reflective of the past 1000-2000 years of human history. My question is why look at history short-term instead of long-term?
    2
  11061.  @rufanuf1  Also, you claim that the West should "start applying the "eye for eye" "dog eat dog" doctrine of the Chinese" but when has that ever been part of Chinese doctrine? In actuality, Chinese government promotes win-win cooperation which are mutually beneficial as well as policies like "Common Prosperity" yet why is it you take such a negative view of Chinese policies?
    2
  11062.  @rufanuf1  You keep on claiming that somehow China will abuse its new found power, but where in China's history has world domination been in mind? During the Ming Dynasty for example, The Chinese navy was powerful and had sailed to Africa, India and the Middle East, but nowhere did China found any overseas colonies. In fact, it was the later Western colonial powers that started colonizing other countries, so why is it that you project onto China what Western powers have been doing for centuries?
    2
  11063.  @rufanuf1  So at least both of us agree on the subject of low approval rates in Western democracies at the moment. Then honestly speaking, why continue to support a political system that produces such inept leaders in the first place? On the other hand, throughout history, many authoritarian systems have produced great leaders (even in Europe) and even today, President Putin and President Xi enjoy high approval from Russians and Chinese.
    2
  11064.  @rufanuf1  China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, etc to map out China's future in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. Our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is an advantage of China's form of governance. Whereas in the United States for example, the POTUS have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only make short-term plans instead of long-term plans, spanning, say 10 years or more for America's future. This is a disadvantage of the US form of governance.
    2
  11065.  @rufanuf1  It's astounding how you keep on accusing Russia and China of "trying to empire build" while downplaying the US hegemonic rule. And you're not even American yourself, yet you rush to justify their wars? Why the double standards here?
    2
  11066.  @rufanuf1  So you've admitted that the current hegemony exists? Then why are you accusing China and Russia of "trying to build empire" while justifying the wars in which the current hegemon waged? Yet you cannot see the double standards where you accuse another country of "potentially" becoming a hegemon, while defending the current one?
    2
  11067.  @rufanuf1  I did answer you question, my answer was "Where I studied English is not important. Western countries adopt the same view towards China and perceive our country as "the enemy"," Just look at your posts, you accuse China of the possibility of "global domination" while you overlook what the US is doing across the globe. You said: "The Aussies have been insulting their ancestors for centuries, the Brits just laugh at their overt nationalism. That is humility and I see that as something seriously lacking in Chinese culture," Why on Earth should Chinese culture be more like Australian culture and British culture? Our ancestors were actual people that lived, worked, and died in these very lands that we call China today, why should we repay our ancestor's hard work and sacrifice with insults? It clearly makes no sense why you think Chinese should try and be like Westerners.
    2
  11068.  @rufanuf1  You said: "That is another product of the political culture and system of the country." So Australian culture and British culture is the product of their political culture and system of their government? Such cultures that insults ancestors and takes no pride in patriotism? Then why should China adopt Western-style democracy if it imparts such a decadent culture onto their peoples? In fact, both of us agreed that the inept leaders of the West are a product of their political system, then all the more reason why China should not adopt a Western-style democracy isn't it? Why should China adopt a political system that produces such incompetent leaders?
    2
  11069.  @rufanuf1  I've noticed that you've never actually answered my question about the tragic loss of life in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and Yemen, being somehow "justified" by the US just because its not over territorial claims. Millions of Iraqis have been killed as a result of the Iraq War, yet you claim its justified by the US just because its not a grab at territory.
    2
  11070.  @rufanuf1  Because the US hegemony has caused untold suffering in various wars such as Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Yemen War, and yet the huge death toll is just casually brushed aside by you just goes to show your double standards. Instead, you speak about hypothetical scenarios about Russia and China "trying to empire build" while ignoring the current world hegemon's activities.
    2
  11071.  @rufanuf1  The Chinese government rules China because it's a meritocracy, where politicians are promoted base on performance. For example, President Xi Jinping has around 40 years of political experience under his belt, so that's why many Chinese feel that he's competent enough to govern our country of 1.5 billion (certainly no easy feat). Whereas in democracy, it's a popularity contest for the politician with the most charisma, and that's how Trump got elected in 2016, despite having no prior political experience. It happened once in 2016, then it can happen again in 2024. What then are the benefits of such a political system?
    2
  11072.  @rufanuf1  So you agree about China being all set to resume our previous status as a superpower? At least we have something in agreement.
    2
  11073.  @rufanuf1  Why is it that many Westerners aren't able to accept the rise of China? All good things eventually come to an end, and nobody says that the West has to be the dominant power and that's the end of the story. If China can someday surpass what the West has achieved, then we should strive to achieve this eventual goal.
    2
  11074.  @rufanuf1  It's no secret that Chinese are among the world's most intelligent and diligent of peoples. Chinese are no stranger to hard work, such as being rickshaw drivers, laborers (coolies), chefs (of Chinese restaurants), farmers, laundromat workers and other stereotypical Chinese blue-collar jobs. Even in white-collar jobs, Chinese can be doctors, lawyers, engineers, computer programmers, scientists, etc. There is literally no job too low or too high that Chinese aren't willing to do, or aren't qualified for.
    2
  11075.  @rufanuf1  Yet why is it that many people in the West (but not all) think of Chinese as being unable to govern ourselves? With our 5,000 of history as well as being among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, China is one of the most successful countries in terms of longevity
    2
  11076.  @rufanuf1  Even if you look at China's history, China never had a policy of founding overseas colonies. Even during the Ming Dynasty, China had a powerful navy that visited other countries, and yet China did not found any overseas colonies, unlike the later European colonial powers.
    2
  11077.  @rufanuf1  Good news. Chinese President Xi spoke to Zelenskyy over the phone, indicating China's commitment to bring a peaceful resolution the Ukraine conflict.
    2
  11078.  @klhilde  Take smartphones for example, and Chinese companies dominate the Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019, according to this source: mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html 1st Place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) And even if Hong Kong is unavailable to sign business deals, Chinese companies can always sign deals elsewhere, say in Singapore for example, and the deal will still pull through. You think Hong Kong is the only place in the world to sign deals, is that it?
    2
  11079.  @klhilde  Business in China still continues as usual, even if Hong Kong collapses. In China there are so many business startups every day, and China has world's 2nd highest number of unicorns (startups with a current valuation of US$1 billion or more) Source: List of unicorn startup companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unicorn_startup_companies 1. United States (127 unicorns) 2. China (104 unicorns) <-- 3. India (23 unicorns) 4. South Korea (9 unicorns) 5. United Kingdom (8 unicorns) 6. Indonesia (4 unicorns) The top unicorns are mostly dominated by China and USA: 1. Ant Financial ($150 billion) (Chinese) 2. Bytedance ($78.0 billion) (Chinese) 3. DiDi ($56 billion) (Chinese) 4. WeWork ($45 billion) (American) 5. Airbnb ($38 billion) (American) ... But where are all the startups from Hong Kong you tell me?
    2
  11080.  @ThomasRosehands  Were your family promoting separatism in Hong Kong?
    2
  11081.  @ginger_breadman  You said: "”build and take over the foreign infrastructure” … there, I fixed it." Which foreign infrastructure has been taken over by China completely? The fact is that the infrastructure is built in other countries and remains very much the property of the country itself.
    2
  11082.  @yslee1401  Many Chinese in Australia are feeling unwelcome, in fact, there's a rise in a number of racially motivated attacks singling out Chinese (and also other Asians like Japanese, Koreans, etc) in Australia.
    2
  11083.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Putin just pushed the traditionally neural Finland to join the NATO." By doing so, Finland has lost all pretense of neutrality, and is making and unnecessary enemy of Russia, when it could have elected to remain as a neutral mediator just like China.
    2
  11084.  @CyrusJanssen  Cyrus, I'm sure you know about how China is portrayed in the west and found such portrayal to be vastly different from reality. Yet when it comes to how they portray Russia, you believe what they say about Russia?
    2
  11085.  @stunningandbrave2520  "Isn't Cyprus' message quite as consistent as you've been preaching? So you have been proven wrong again Shenzhou." Cyrus message is primary about if China and the US cooperates, than the whole world benefits. There is no mention what Russia's stance will be in Cyrus message, so how have I been proven wrong?
    2
  11086.  @MarkYeung1  One can be a Jew and still be neo-Nazi. There are records of Jews that aided the Germans during WWII, and even Western media has reported on Ukraine having a problem with such an ideology. The thing about Russia's Victory Day is that the Soviet Union suffered the most casualties out of WWII (just like Chinese casualties at the hands of Japanese) and the Soviets also inflicted the most damage on to Germany during WWII.
    2
  11087.  @MarkYeung1  Zelenskyy supports the Azov Battalion which consisted of neo-Nazis. Even Western documentaries have documented the rise of this ideology in Ukraine, and yet when it comes to 2022, suddenly they are quiet about the Azov Battalion previous activities?
    2
  11088.  @stunningandbrave2520  "神州 Shenzhou >so how have I been proven wrong? By your hostile reaction to his post."_ Could you explain how has my reaction hostile towards Cyrus Janssen? Did perhaps I threaten or coerce him in any way? You said: "Clearly you want him to have "correct" opinions beyond those of " if China and the US cooperates," Did I ever said that. Cyrus is clearly entitled to his own opinions, I was merely voicing my own point of view that's all. How's that being hostile?
    2
  11089.  @stunningandbrave2520  Hostile can be defined as using threatening or coercive words towards Cyrus Janssen. The use of profanities and vulgar language may also indicate a hostile reaction. You said: "You went straight to the accusatory, hostile style that you use against all enemies of the CCP. Example: "Cyrus, I'm sure you know about how China is portrayed in the west and found such portrayal to be vastly different from reality. Yet when it comes to how they portray Russia, you believe what they say about Russia?" Where is the hostility in this example? All I'm asking is a simple question that's all. It's apparent that you're unable to find any concrete examples of hostility from me, which is probably the reason why you refuse to define hostile, (i.e 神州 Shenzhou I don't have to define "hostile.") so that you can go on accusing me of something I've never expressed.
    2
  11090.  @4x4r974  You said: "Nobody ever in the US talks about China." Are you serious? China is literally plastered all over the headlines of American news media. How many times did Trump mention China?
    2
  11091.  @camt8804  "Shenzhou. I will not be lectured to by a separatist like you." Lol, where have I shown to be a separatist? You on the other hand, claimed that Chinese diplomat Zheng Xiyuan was dragged by embassy staff into the grounds and beaten, which just goes to show that you can't even be bothered to accurately check the facts first, before feigning sympathy.
    2
  11092.  @camt8804  Where did I ever mention anything about Hong Kong "expats" living in China? You're just throwing a red herring after I've shown that you can't be bothered to check the video to before claiming that "embassy staff dragged Zheng Xiyuan into the grounds and beat him" like you said.
    2
  11093.  @ChuckUstaad  China has 5,000 years of history and is among one of the world's oldest "continuous" civilizations still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia have since succumbed to history. For all of its history, China has always been governed by a strong central government, under the leadership of the Emperor of China, surrounded by ministers in the Imperial Court. History shows that China is governed best under such a system, then why should China abandon this system and adopt "Western-style" democracy? Just look at the state of "democracy" in the West, and why should China attempt to emulate that? Because Westerners say so?
    2
  11094.  @MikeTrainormusic  "buying up all of our property during a housing crisis; Yeah, we don't like communism" If your country puts up its property for sale to foreigners, and if Chinese buyers are interested and willing to purchase those property, then why are you blaming Chinese? I thought the West believed in free-markets after all.
    2
  11095.  @ClaudioCarrera-j6o  If you claim they are lies, why not attempt to refute my points instead of labelling me a wumao?
    2
  11096.  @prw56  "神州 Shenzhou Oh yea, I know they're building. Those ghost cities full of tofu buildings made that very clear," Chinese ghost cities are filling up with occupants. For example, The Daily Zhengzhou was once labelled China's largest ghost city, but today, Zhengzhou has a population of 12,600,574 inhabitants and a total GDP of 1.014 trillion (RMB) in 2018.
    2
  11097.  @zackk4969  How did China become the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people, if China has a culture of "eating baby?" What's the name of the renowned Chinese writer in Chinese characters?
    2
  11098. @Mwaniki Mwaniki Why don't you explain how exactly is World Health Organization is in China's pocket when USA contributes more money to WHO than China? Shouldn't the WHO be in USA's pocket, given that USA is its largest funder?
    2
  11099.  @MrHotMonkey  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    2
  11100. Peng Shuai is clearly safe and she has appeared on IOC video call expressing her desire for her personal privacy to be respected. But the WTA is behaving like the paparazzi and demanding that she appear in public to bare her private affairs for all the world to see.
    2
  11101.  @TheConfusedTaco  "神州 Shenzhou what happened in tiananmen Square June 4th 1989?" According to an article by Gregory Clark, the eyewitnesses say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies (By Gregory Clark)
    2
  11102.  @valenrn8657  You said: "Recognising Crimea's referendum is also applicable to Taiwan" Where is Taiwan's referendum then? Since there is no referendum, then by default, according to Taiwan's constitution, the island is part of China.
    2
  11103. At 4:24 Geraci said: "China should limit purchases of gas and oil from Russia." At 8:44 Geraci said: "We have to rely on Russian gas, we cannot do without it." ... Typical Western example of "Do as I say, not as I do"
    2
  11104.  @dwaynebarnaby3598  China has inducted the world's first operational anti-ship ballistic missile, a "carrier killer" capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, known as the DF-21D. Video: /watch?v=p-cEunmqXM8 The DF-21D is capable of targeting aircraft carrier strike groups out in the open ocean, from the safety of the land. It is capable of carrying both nuclear or conventional warheads, launching from land-based mobile launcher, flying up high above the stratosphere, using its advanced maneuverability to avoid incoming anti-missile defences from below. It's even capable of last-minute terminal guidance, making minute adjustments to its trajectory at hypersonic speeds, just seconds before impact.
    2
  11105.  @blackopal3138  What makes you think China is sinking? Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. Here is compiled list of what Western journalists have to say about China's economy 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. ... But its already 2019, and China's economy is still going strong, so why continue to believe China is sinking? When Western propaganda been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    2
  11106.  @thomasranjit7781  That's precisely why China develops advanced missile technologies, thermonuclear warheads, hypersonic delivery systems, longest range ICBMs and so on. So that USA will find it impossible to use nuclear option on China and still emerge unscathed. And India can't even defeat its own neighbour Pakistan, let alone China.
    2
  11107.  @samfkt  Look at the rise in anti-Asian hate crimes for example. The Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism has revealed that anti-Asian hate crime increased by a whopping 339% last year compared to the year before, with New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles and other cities surpassing their record numbers in 2020. Source: NBC News: Anti-Asian hate crimes increased 339 percent nationwide last year, report says. And look at the Russophobia against Russians. Russian chess players and athletes are being fired, Russian composers, musicians, conductors, dancers, artists are being ostracized in the West.
    2
  11108. Lai only received 40% of the votes, so how can you claim "Democracies are called Legitimate Governments because they truly represent the WILL of the People" when Lai has less than 50% of the votes cast?
    2
  11109. We are in the midst of a global tectonic shift towards a more multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, rather than the old uni-polar world dominated by the voice of USA and it's allies.
    2
  11110. 事实上西藏是喜马拉雅山脉科技最先进的地区。
    2
  11111. If your country have loose gun laws, then psychopaths have easier time committing mass shootings at schools. Its much easier to commit crime in USA, because ordinary people have access to guns. If you introduce strict gun laws, then psychopaths and criminals have harder time doing their thing.
    2
  11112. @UltimateShamrock January 6th, 2021, Capitol Hill, Washington.
    2
  11113. It should be noted that the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has more warships than the United States Navy (USN), and that while the USN forces are spread out all over the globe, the PLAN strength is mostly concentrated in South China Sea and East China Sea. Taiwan island is also located close enough to the mainland such that the PLA Rocket Force (PLARF) is able to bring their anti-ship missiles to bear if conflict breaks out.
    2
  11114. China lifting 500 million out of poverty since 1980s, is equivalent to lifting a number roughly equal to half the entire population of Africa (1.2 billion) out of poverty, in decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. It has been termed "unprecedented" in human history and unlikely to be repeated again by any other country.
    2
  11115. Modern China was built by sweat, blood, toil and sacrifice of Chinese people to turn it from dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, into economic juggernaut today. But people like you left China during the hard times, instead of staying to make China into what it is today.
    2
  11116.  Giovanni Sanchez  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    2
  11117.  Giovanni Sanchez  The US Army lost the Vietnam War against starving communist Vietnamese peasants and they did not win the Korean War against the Communist North Koreans. Even in the Middle East, the US army fought against a bunch of military insurgents but took 15 long years of fighting and still haven't ended the war. The American soldier's child back home can easily grow up with their parents for 15 years, and yet USA still hasn't won. China has inducted the world's first operational anti-ship ballistic missile, a "carrier killer" capable of carrying both conventional and nuclear warheads, known as the DF-21D. Source: Anti-ship Ballistic Missile wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-ship_ballistic_missile#China The US aircraft carriers are going to be expensive sitting ducks for our anti-ship ballistic missiles, which can target moving carriers from the safety of land-based mobile launchers. Each missile has thrusters that help it avoid anti-missile defenses and even terminal guidance capabilities, able to make minute adjustments to its trajectory just seconds before impact. Video: China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile youtu.be/p-cEunmqXM8
    2
  11118.  @kalitech2026  You said: "The US would never attack China without provocation" The USA launched 59 Tomahawk missiles against Syria and recently they assassinated a high-ranking Iranian General Soleiman, what makes you think USA would not attack without provocation when they have a history of doing so?
    2
  11119.  @patrickdempsey4034  Why? Because I bring up China's positive achievements? Why is anyone saying anything remotely positive about China being labelled as working for the CPC?
    2
  11120.  @patrickdempsey4034  Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain and wasn't fully returned. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us. About the South China Sea, the North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    2
  11121.  @mingkao1  Firstly, go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of all the territory Taiwan claims (wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg )
    2
  11122.  @patrickdempsey4034  The so-call International Court that ruled on South China Sea, the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) wasn't even an official UN agency, unlike the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The Permanent Court of Arbitration rents space in the same building as the UN’s International Court of Justice, but the two organisations are not related. Source: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1989486/united-nations-stresses-separation-hague-tribunal Since the arbitration was made by a non-official UN agency, then China reserves the right not to adhere to it's ruling.
    2
  11123.  @mmakshak  "神州 Shenzhou Why don't you look into YouTube about how peaceful China is to their neighbours?" Along with Russia, China has the most neighbours in the world at 14 neighbouring countries Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Russia, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar (Burma), Laos, Vietnam and North Korea. But China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, which country is China currently at war with, you tell me?
    2
  11124.  @mmakshak  Under old Chinese laws, it was legal to harvest organs from prisoners on death row, but it was only with the express permission of the prisoner or their family members. In my opinion, the prisoners are already sentenced to death, so at least the organs will be put to good use saving someone's life, rather than being wasted and buried together with the body after death. But since 2014, China has abolished the practice of harvesting organs from executed prisoners, and the number of transplants in China are low and organ waiting lists long. Source: The Economist: China ends the practice of harvesting organs from executed prisoners economist.com/graphic-detail/2014/12/30/organ-harvest
    2
  11125.  @mmakshak  About Intellectual Property, China applies for more patents than any other country in the world and we also have the world's largest number of granted patents, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators. Patent applications for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (1,542,002 patents) 2. United States (597,141 patents) 3. Japan (313,567 patents) 4. South Korea (209,992 patents) 5. European Patent Office (174,397 patents) 6. Germany (67,898 patents) ... Source: World Intellectual Property Indicators wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Indicators#Patents Patent grants for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (432,147 patents) 2. United States (307,759 patents) 3. Japan (194,525 patents) 4. European Patent Office (127,603 patents) 5. South Korea (119,012 patents) 6. Russian Federation (35,774 patents) ...
    2
  11126.  @mmakshak  About "interference in the affairs of other countries" China observes a policy of non-interference in other countries, it's the USA that's going around poking its fingers in the Middle East (Iraq, Afghanistan, etc) and South America (Venezuela, Cuba, Bolivia, etc) and now wants to interfere in China's domestic affairs in Xinjiang. Yet you want to complain about China interference in other countries?
    2
  11127.  @patrickdempsey4034  Why do you want a revolution in China and for Chinese to overthrow our government and establish Western brand of democracy? The collapse of the communist party of China will plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why'd you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China? China's political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    2
  11128.  @FullPerspective  "Shenzhou. I never said Iceland was not involved with WW2 why do you keep trying to manipulate the text?" Did I ever said you said Iceland was not involved with WW2? Then who's trying to manipulate the text here? The fact is that you claimed "Many countries has not been at war for more than 100 year, and have also not invaded anyone." yet here you are struggling to just name 5 of such countries. You said: "A geographical and national identity is not the same, just ask the Greeks and Macedonians, but you should know that too when it comes to China and Taiwan." Taiwan island is a province of China, both geographically as well as nationally. Even till today, Taiwan calls itself the Republic of China. You said: "Do you not understand yet that the word PEACE means more than just "not being in a official war"?" But the basic meaning of peace is still the same, that a country is not at war with any other. Therefore, there's nothing wrong when I repeatedly defended the claim that China is currently at peace and not at war with any country. You said: "the word peace has 2 MEANINGS CAN YOU GET THIS TO SINK THROUGH YOUR HEAD PLEASE," But since we are talking about a country (i.e China) then peace has a specific meaning when referring to a country, in that as to whether the country is at war or not. And in China's case, China clearly fits the definition of peace.
    2
  11129.  @FullPerspective  You said: "When I therefore say that China is not a peaceful country it is obvious that I am referring to the FIRST definition of peace which is "free from disturbance; tranquil." With such a definition then no country in the world is at peace. Because no country in the world is free from any disturbance nor are they tranquil. Disturbances come in the form of conflicts, be it small scuffles or wars. Disputes over economic trade with other countries are surely a form of disturbance. Natural disasters such as volcano eruptions, earthquakes, wild fires, typhoons, etc certainly count as a form of disturbance isn't it? I don't even need to go further than the end of 2019 to see that countries all over world face a global disturbance that shut down businesses, closed down borders, brought air-traffic to a screeching halt, and brought protestors out into the streets. So in effect, there's basically no country in the world that fits your first definition of peace. Therefore, it's pointless to talk about your first definition of peace. When talking about countries, it's the second definition that applies, and China clearly fits the definition of being at peace.
    2
  11130.  Current Channel  What happened to the American Free Market? What abou the Rule of Law? youtu.be/Tt2tYwleWqU
    2
  11131.  Current Channel  Schellenberg was caught attempting to smuggle 222 kg of methamphetamines (about a refrigerator's worth of meth) through vehicular tires. Under Chinese law, the punishment for smuggling drugs is death penalty, yet Schellenberg (being a Canadian citizen) was given just 15 years. Yet Schelleberg wasn't satisfied that he escaped the death penalty for smuggling and gotten off with just 15 years, and he decide to appeal the case? Then the new court decide to sentence Schelleberg to death, because that's the original penalty for smuggling over 1kg worth of drugs.
    2
  11132. Aside from these figures alone, China also has weapons like hypersonic missiles (DF-ZF) and anti-satellite missile capabilities which India currently lacks.
    2
  11133.  @Vivek_Z  Yes. I'm glad that there are some Indians like you that recognise that people's mind have been colonized, and they need to learn to break free of this. Of course it's up to Indians themselves to realize their own destiny, but unless they can successfully decolonize their minds (and constitution, institutions, judicial systems, etc) their actions will continue to serve the colonizer's interests instead of the Indian interests of Indians.
    2
  11134. As long as conflict does not break out in the Taiwan Strait, the US will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise.
    2
  11135. Another commonly mistranslated Chinese word is Xuānchuán (宣传). It means "propaganda" in English, but it also means dissemination of public information when used in the context of the government. Since the word "propaganda" has a negative connotation associated with it, so most English-language news just translate it as propaganda when actually has a different meaning in a different context.
    2
  11136.  @woa2193  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    2
  11137.  @3333juul  About the Social Credit System, many foreigners often complain Chinese people spit in public, smoke in non-smoking areas, jump queues, disobey traffic rules, jay walk, drive on wrong side of the road, speed through red lights, etc when not all Chinese people are like that. We Chinese feel embarrassed that such bad people represent China overseas, so the government is considering a social credit system to discourage such bad behaviour and promote better behaviour instead. This will be a meritocratic system where good behaviour is rewarded and bad behaviour penalised. But if such people persist with bad behaviour, until their scores fall to become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisances of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again.
    2
  11138. China's Tianwen-1 is preparing to "spy" on Mars and see what those Martians are up to.
    2
  11139.  Cipher Crypto  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    2
  11140.  @manolsen4868  Why not ask the Uighurs in China? The population of Uighurs in China has grown from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 …… Yet the West still speaks of Uighur genocide? When the population of Uighurs in China actually tripled in size over the years?
    2
  11141. +christuffer said: "The world would still be in the primitive dark ages if it wasn't for Britain." The sciences, mathematics, astronomy of Britain had historical roots from Asia, and technology like crossbows and gunpowder came from China. The British Empire brutalized the entire global by colonizing other lands, importing slaves from Africa to do laborious work, causing genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, occupation of their lands and plundering resources like gold from Africa and Asia. During British rule of India, British made use of Indian troops to fight Nazi Germany, (which the war had nothing to do with India) Winston Churchill was a racist against Indians and he deliberately caused a famine in Bengali, by stockpiling food for British troops and causing 4 million Indians to starve to death. When the British first colonized India, India was a wealthy country with 25% GDP, but when the British left India, its GDP had fallen to 4% British also wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China didn't want to sell it, so they waged two bloody wars with China (the 1st war made use of Indian troops) and forced Chinese to buy opium from them, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to spread the addiction throughout rest of China, and Hong Kong was stolen and made a British colony. And that's not covering what Britain did to America, to Africa, to Australia. Otherwise, why is it most of the world speaks English today?
    2
  11142. The China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has created at least 75,000 jobs for Pakistanis, and is expected to create as many as 700,000 more new job opportunities for local people by 2030. Also, Sri Lanka's debt is only 10% Chinese, and the remaining 90% of Sri Lanka's debt is owned by the West, Japan and India.
    2
  11143. If Filipinos have fighting pride, then why do you want to involve your allies in your own territorial disputes? What's there to be proud of when you have to rely on American soldiers risking their lives and dying for "rocks" in the South China Sea for Philippines sake? If Filipinos take pride in themselves then shouldn't it be Filipino soldiers themselves willing to die for their claims instead?
    2
  11144. Because there is always the possibility that your ally may not fight for you. For example, Russia had a military intervention in Crimea and annexed it from Ukraine, but the USA did nothing about it except impose sanctions on Russia that's all. So why Filipinos think that the USA would be willing to go to war with China for Philippines sake? What sort of "fighting pride" is this, where you get your allies to die for "rocks" in the South China Sea?
    2
  11145. Mercouris reported this news at the time when the Moskva was still putting out the fire, it's a given that news change and gets updated over time.
    2
  11146. WenLi Yang Why not include fantasy? ROTK is famous for being a blend of fantasy and history, so it won't be the same, if it's too realistic.
    2
  11147.  Naikomi  Did user Ink Bold even mentioned anything about Europe at all in his/her comment? He/she talked mostly about the plight of Asian Americans like Japanese Americans, so isn't it clear that it's about the United States?
    2
  11148.  Naikomi  The term "White Caucasians" is somewhat outdated, but it also refers to Caucasians living in Middle East, North Africa (i.e Egypt), Australia, New Zealand. Even the people of India are somewhat predominantly Caucasoid, but it's clear from Ink Bold's comments that he/she was mainly specifying white Americans. That's why he/she's talking about Taiwanese Americans , Japanese Americans or other Asian Americans. Why are you seemingly offended even when he/she never mentioned Europe in his/her comment?
    2
  11149.  @ph-free-blogger  China was at one point, but today, China is not a province of Mongolia. Whereas Taiwan's constitution states that the island is part of China, and countries all over the world recognize the One China policy that Taiwan is part of China.
    2
  11150.  @张继科の铁粉  Taiwanese aboriginal's ancestors descended from China's southeast coast some 5,000 years ago, which is around the start of 5,000 years of Chinese history. Aren't Chinese in the mainland today the same people as was 5,000 years ago? As for Vietnamese people, they literally look indistinguishable from Chinese. There's this trafficking case in 2019, where 39 Vietnamese victims suffocated while in the back of lorry attempting to smuggle them into Essex in the UK. The Essex police initially thought the 39 victims were all Chinese and you can still find articles online of this mistaken identity.
    2
  11151.  @张继科の铁粉  "Taiwanese aboriginals are more closely related to Polynesian people like Moari in New Zealand (Maori ancestors actually came from Taiwan)" Well, it just means that Maori ancestors came from Taiwan, and the ancestors of Taiwan aborigines came from mainland China some 5,000 years ago (around the start of Chinese civilization). Regardless of whoever the inhabitants are, the territory of Taiwan island is regarded as part of China under Taiwan's own constitution.
    2
  11152.  @billinsf88  Agreed, this @mark yeung claims Carrie Lam admitted that it was a mistake, but had no proof, and she apologised for her mishandling of the extradition bill (not that the extradition bill was a mistake) but @mark yeung sees nothing wrong with allowing a Hong Kong murderer loose and denying justice for the victim's family.
    2
  11153.  @MarkYeung1  You repeatedly stated several times that the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo, and that "warmonger" Beijing doesn't consider it, then why is Beijing apparently allowing the status quo to continue? Isn't that an example of Beijing taking the people of Taiwan's feelings into consideration?
    2
  11154.  @henrytep8884  You said: "Shenzhou. I’m talking about the total investment of the belt and road versus the revenue is generating currently." That's not what you said, you specifically said (and I quote your words) "Also show me where the belt and road initiative is finally paying off?? Where?" So it's clear that you're asking for a specific section, not the total investment of the BRI, why are you suddenly changing the goalpost?
    2
  11155.  @henrytep8884  "Shenzhou. The Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) sighted 48 Chinese fishing vessels around the Philippines Economic Exclusion Zone in the South China Sea on June 30," Which area of the EEZ were those fishing vessels spotted? China's government actually imposed a fishing ban on the South China Sea to allow fish to replenish. The ban lasts from May 1 to Aug 16 every year and since the report says its June, that means China's SCS fishing ban was in effect.
    2
  11156. French eat snails and horsemeat, British eat rabbit stew and Australian eat kangaroo meat, so what's the big deal?
    2
  11157. @Anu아누 You Koreans also eat dog meat where its known as "Gaegogi" (개고기, "dog meat") so what's the problem? Source: Dog meat consumption in South Korea wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_meat_consumption_in_South_Korea
    2
  11158.  @pattycakez4527  China has the world's largest population that's why people rather migrate out. America had very loose immigration laws, as long as an immigrant have family member or relative who's American citizen, then they are themselves eligible for US citizenship. That's why many Asians, Mexicans, Muslims, etc marry American citizens in order to qualify for citizenship and import their relatives over to the USA.
    2
  11159.  @Hanabis924  The Azov Battalion have been given free rein by the Ukrainian government to conduct genocide on the ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Luhansk. The Russian language is banned in those regions and shelling by both sides has resulted in the deaths of some 14,000 civilians in those two region. Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that was set in motion since the 2014 coup d'etat of Ukraine's government by USA.
    2
  11160.  @GonzoTehGreat  As for the claims of cultural genocide, China had been lobbying for UNESCO to recognize Uighur culture as a UNESCO Intangible Heritage. Go to UNESCO Website and search for "Uighur Muqam of Xinjiang" and it turns out that it was China that lobbied for Muqam to be inscribed in 2008 (3.COM) on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity (originally proclaimed in 2005). So isn't China doing the opposite of "cultural genocide" by registering Uighur culture as a UNESCO Intangible Heritage?
    2
  11161.  @christophercooper2208  Because the East Turkestan Islamic Movement is a terrorist organization consisting of Uighur separatist that want to create a country that did not exist before. The term "East Turkestan" was coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists, including Nikita Bichurin, who intended the name to replace the common Western term for the region, Chinese Turkestan. So it's just an attempt to rebrand historically Chinese territory that's all.
    2
  11162.  @christophercooper2208  France itself literally has re-education camps for terrorists. According to The Times article entitled: France fights terror with camps for re-education France will send radicalised Islamists to re-education centres under a €40 million plan to tackle extremism, which the prime minister says is the biggest threat to the nation since Hitler. The suspects will be taught their patriotic duties and forced to undergo psychological treatment in an attempt to counter jihadist indoctrination. So you're against China having re-education centres when that's exactly what France has? Why the double standards here?
    2
  11163.  @rpg1663  I suggest you watch Oliver Stone's 2016 documentary "Ukraine On Fire" to learn more about the seeds of fascism that were planted in Ukraine during Nazi Germany, and have gone unpunished, giving rise to a new breed of Ukrainian ultra-nationlist neo-nazis. Even when NATO had snapped pictures of Ukraine soldiers displaying Nazi emblems as part of their military insignia, and when users pointed them out on social media, those pics were removed.
    2
  11164.  @christophercooper2208  It's the first time you've heard of French re-education camps? Go check out The Times article entitled: France fights terror with camps for re-education Taken from the article: France will send radicalised Islamists to re-education centres under a €40 million plan to tackle extremism, which the prime minister says is the biggest threat to the nation since Hitler. The suspects will be taught their patriotic duties and forced to undergo psychological treatment in an attempt to counter jihadist indoctrination.
    2
  11165.  GEO NEO  Imperial Japan refused to surrender even after 2 atomic bombings by the USA, and US soldiers didn't even invade the Japanese mainland. It was actually the Soviet invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria that was the last campaign fought of WWII that finally caused Japan to surrender. Source: Soviet invasion of Japanese-occupied was the last campaign fought of WWII wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Manchuria So if anything, we should be thanking the Communist Party of the Soviet Union for causing Japan to surrender and finally putting an end to WWII.
    2
  11166.  GEO NEO  The USA did not help China enter the World Trade Organization. When the WTO was founded in 1995, China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate our country as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because the United States, European countries, and Japan requested that China first reform various tariff policies, including tariff reductions, open markets and industrial policies. That's why China had a late entry into WTO in 2001, instead of being a WTO founding member in 1995. Because USA and it's allies posed obstacles to China's entry into WTO. Yet you're saying China should be grateful for the USA acting as a barrier for China's entry into WTO in 1995?
    2
  11167. China is the world's largest exporter of high-tech products. Here's hi-tech exports for 2022 1. China ($769 billion) 2. Germany ($223 billion) 3. Hong Kong, China ($194 billion) 4. United States of America ($166 billion) 5. Vietnam ($122 billion) 6. South Korea ($985 billion) 7. France ($957 billion) 8. Singapore ($94 billion) 9. Netherlands ($92 billion) 10. Mexico ($85 billion) ... Source: TheGlobalEconomy
    2
  11168. It's a shame the Let's Talk China session by Gweilo 60, Barrett, JaYoe Nation, Reporterfy Media, etc every weekend has stopped.
    2
  11169.  @paddyharrigan1530  那你还学中文干嘛呢？ 为啥不学英语，日本语和韩语呢？
    2
  11170.  @JessieSong0301  Some employees may crave respect and recognition more than receiving a higher paycheck.
    2
  11171. If you look at history, many human societies gravitated towards authoritarianism and oligarchies. Political power is held not in the hands of many, but in the hands of the few elites, like nobles (aristocracy), priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy) or other authoritarian forms. Such political systems were popular, because they were stable and they worked! The elites were oftentimes well-educated and politically aware to make important decisions regarding the country's future, while the ignorant, uneducated masses were kept away from politics. Democracy has long history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, even Republic of Rome fell. These proto-democracies did not succeed and democracy was never popular outside of Greece in the ancient times. Modern Western democracy has a history of 100-200 years so it doesn't necessarily mean it will be successful in future.
    2
  11172. Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. Here is compiled list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. But its already 2019, and China's economy is still going strong, despite all expectations of failure. Can't you see Western predictions about Chinese economy failing have been proven consistently wrong from almost 30 years already?
    2
  11173. Japanese forces committed wartime atrocities such as Rape of Nanjing, Unit 731 and "comfort" women, so much that even South Koreans victims protest outside Japanese embassy over comfort women issue. During the Rape of Nanjing, Japanese solders butchered unarmed Chinese men for sport, and many Chinese women were gang raped, their bodies were left naked and mutilated, with their genitals bayoneted or having sharp sticks of bamboo shoved in. Young children and the elderly weren't spared, and Japanese soldiers cut open young children's bodies in order to better rape them. Pregnant women had their swollen bellies bayoneted after being raped, and the unborn fetus ripped open from their wombs.
    2
  11174. +Haruka ino What about Unit 731 then? During unit 731, the Japanese conducted human experiments on Chinese prisoners, including men, women and children. Prisoners were infected with various diseases, and subject to live vivisection, often without anesthesia. Japanese performed invasive surgeries into prisoners, organs were removed, limbs amputated, and then reattached to opposite sides of the body, all while the subject is kept alive. There are prisoners who even had their stomachs removed and their esophagus reattached to the intestines, presumably to see how long humans can survive without the stomach. The women had it worst during Unit 731. There were experiments with sexually transmitted diseases, by first injecting prisoners and forcing them at gunpoint to spread the infection to other prisoners. Women were raped and impregnated (sometimes by Japanese themselves) and then vivisected at various stages to study the effects of diseases on their organs or on their pregnancy. Some Japanese scientists even raped prisoners and then had experiments conducted on unborn children they fathered with female prisoners there. I mean, can you imagine if you are woman prisoner in Unit 731? Or that you are a man injected with STD and forced to have sex at gunpoint to spread it to other prisoners? Why not inject everyone with STD, instead of forcing prisoners to spread STD by sex? Chinese people only wanted to defend our lands that's all, and protect our homes and loved ones. But the Japanese invaded our territory, stole our lands, killed our men, raped our women and then conducted inhuman scientific experiments on our children.
    2
  11175. +Haruka ino How is it the same comment? And even South Korea victims (now in their 80-90s) protest outside the Japanese embassy because of the "comfort" women issue.
    2
  11176. pepsi sisu2 猴子们又在吵架啊～
    2
  11177.  @tongeen China is currently at peace and not at war with any country (since our last conflict in 1979). Right now, many countries all over Asia regard China as their biggest trading partner, so how is that akin to bullying?
    2
  11178.  @tongeen  "Then stop trying to take over Taiwan and all of south Cina sea." Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, etc) as part of their territory, as well as territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Bhutan, Myanmar, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Look up the Map of Republic of China to see the extend of Taiwan's claims. ... (Source: Wikipedia: File: ROC Administrative and Claims) Since Taiwan can claim all of mainland China, then can't the mainland claim Taiwan as well? In fact, the 1992 consensus shows that Taiwan's acknowledge the One China principle that there is only One China and that Taiwan is a part of it. As for the South China Sea, The Republic of China (Taiwan) published the 11 Dash Line in 1948, encompassing a wide swath of the South China Sea and PRC's 9 Dash Line is derived from Taiwan's 11 Dash Line. So if anything, it was the Nationalist KMT that claimed a larger area of the South China Sea than mainland China today under the CPC.
    2
  11179.  @tongeen  You said: "Let Tibet go they are not Chinese." Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, back when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. Centuries later, the Manchurian conquerors also made Tibet part of Qing Dynasty China. Even though Tibet briefly broke free of China in 1912, they were eventually reunified with the mainland by 1952. So what makes you claim Tibet is not Chinese? Tibet was a part of China since even before Christopher Columbus arrived in America.
    2
  11180.  @tongeen  The US did. But they were dropped on the Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians, mainly women, children, the elderly, and men who were unfit for frontline duty. Those were civilian targets, not military, and the vast bulk of Imperial Japanese Army remained largely unaffected. That's why Imperial Japan refused to surrender even after those 2 bombings, it was only after the Soviet Union invaded Japanese-occupied Manchuria, did Imperial Japan finally surrendered. It was the last battle fought of WWII, and if not for the Soviet Union, we would be speaking German and/or Japanese today.
    2
  11181.  @tongeen  Earlier you claimed that the Tibetans are not Chinese, yet the Tibetan language is part of the same language family, namely the Sino-Tibetan language family.
    2
  11182. For videos on the progress of China's reusable rocket launch system, I recommend Dongfang Hour.
    2
  11183.  @kammonkam4905  "You evaluate a policy by its outcome, not by "culture"." In other words, are you saying Western countries like Canada and USA can just throw away their "culture" of freedom of speech and right to protest, and just impose a vaccine mandate for everyone in their countries? Of course not, you'll have to factor in each country's individual culture, and China's Confucian cultures is about valuing the elderly. It's regrettable that some elderly cannot get medicine and visit hospitals, but can you imagine how much more serious the situation would be if Shanghai had not implemented lockdown and just allowed the virus to roam free and claim more elderly lives? How am I racially stereotyping? You're Chinese but when did I ever mention anything about race here in this thread? On the other hand you calling it "fortune cookie trope" sounds like something a racist would say.
    2
  11184.  @一个说话大声的中国人  Well said. More virus transmissions means higher chances of mutation, and higher possibility of newer, deadly variants emerging. For example, the Delta variant of Covid-19 was first detected in India, so it's possible that just allowing the virus to spread rampant in a country with a huge population might result in newer, deadlier, more transmissible variants emerging.
    2
  11185. I watched Oliver Stone's 2019 documentary, Revealing Ukraine (available on YT) where Oliver interviewed Medvedchuk and his wife, and it turns out that Putin is godfather to his children. He's a politician no doubt, but he seems to really care about his country and what Western powers did to de-industrialize Ukraine. Just search the documentary title here on YT for people wanting to know more about him.
    2
  11186.  @wrongchannel2780  Agreed. I wonder has that ol jack burton guy ever talked to former inmates, drug addicts, gamblers, about being allowed to "ruin their own lives"? At such a young age too?
    2
  11187.  Comrad Civil  If China can someday surpass the United States as the premier world superpower in the future, then why not Canada realign their interests to prepare for the future? Why stick with a sinking ship?
    2
  11188.  @cbulk1402  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w Yet there is growing anti-China sentiment instead of resentment towards the United States? What is going on in the world here?
    2
  11189. 终有一天～人类会住在火星上。 There will be a day when mankind lives on Mars.
    2
  11190. We were talking about emulating Scandinavia's political system, not seizing their actual territory.
    2
  11191. +Tommy O Donovan It was a Chinese Civil War and Chinese were killing Chinese (just like in American Civil War where Americans killed Americans) Chairman Mao may not be a good governor, but he was an excellent tactician and able to unify China under communism (which the previous KMT administration failed to unify China under democracy) If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be divided into various provinces, ruled by individual warlords, and constantly fighting among ourselves, instead of the united country China is today. A country is strong if unified and weak if divided and fighting among ourselves.
    2
  11192.  @westerntaiwan6893  Spain is always welcome to reject all China's donations and manufacture their own 100% accurate Covid-19 test kits if they want.
    2
  11193.  @Sean-giang  I presume that you mean "happy" when you use the word gay.
    2
  11194.  @syncmaster915n  It's true that that US General had to make two phone calls to his Chinese counterpart regarding the possibility of a potential nuclear strike. But I suspect it's done mostly to clarify any misunderstandings and to reassure China.
    2
  11195.  @freedumb_3.0  Bribed someone for what? If it was a personal matter in his family, then it has been settled, so how does that constitute an offense in which he has to be convicted?
    2
  11196.  @MarkYeung1  Putin evacuated those Ukrainian children to relative safety in Russia, away from the warzone in Ukraine. Putin has since returned some 387 children back to Ukraine and in good hands of their family and relatives.
    2
  11197.  @freedumb_3.0  Daniels had signed a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) meaning that she wasn't supposed to say anything about it. If she went public with the information despite having previously signed a NDA, then under the law, she was the one who broke the agreement here.
    2
  11198.  @MarkYeung1  But I doubt the prices are the same for street food in China as compared to in Canada.
    2
  11199. The Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) is fueling Sinophobia in the West.
    2
  11200. Egypt refused because accepting those displaced Palestinians would mean Israel can simply take over Gaza and not allow the displaced Palestinians to return home.
    2
  11201. Exactly. China has hatched 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, etc, to chart the country's direction. Our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans bloom and come to fruition for 2025, 2030, 2040, and beyond. Whereas the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can't make long-term plans (say 10 years or more) for America's future.
    2
  11202.  @timmyg44  At least it shows that President Xi is aware of the problems China is facing and that the Chinese government is working to fix them. But for comparison, what is US President's New Years message? That he's eaten pasta and chicken parmesan (and let's not forget his favorite, ice-cream).
    2
  11203.  @timmyg44  Everyone got the variant that is less harmful today. But in the beginning the strain had a higher mortality rate, and China took decisive action to report the unknown pneumonia-like illness to the World Health Organization by Dec 2019 (hence giving its name) as well as taking measures preventing its spread. Had the government not done so, there would invariably be more deaths in China.
    2
  11204. Most young people today are already glued to their phones even while out in public. AR glasses and other such devices could possibly facilitate better integration of cyberspace with reality. Whereas in the U.S's cases, they seem more interested in creating a virtual reality that exists separately.
    2
  11205.  The Snurger  Chairman Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Chairman Mao couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he'll wish for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    2
  11206.  @yslee1401  Why would Meng even want to go to the USA? USA is suffering from a pandemic crisis (400,000 Covid-19 deaths), a healthcare crisis (shortage of PPE and hospital beds), an economic crisis (50 million unemployed), a social crisis (George Floyd/BLM protests) even a climate crisis (California wildfires/hurricanes) and to top it all off, a political crisis (Capitol Hill Insurrection), so why the heck would Meng Wanzhou even want to travel to the USA? Your conspiracy theory is out of wack that's all.
    2
  11207. Russia already won the war. Now, it just needs to win the peace.
    2
  11208.  @bartonlee3594  If you look at your posts, a number of them have the (edited) tag attached to them, whereas none of my posts have such a tag, so why are you accusing me of editing my posts?
    2
  11209. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑
    2
  11210. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  11211. Most of the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  11212.  @MarkYeung1  "But Chinese are not like Shenzhou who criticize you as a colonialist." I never called Himanshu Gurjar a colonialist, I said that the colonial mentality has clouded his vision, to see his Pakistani not as brothers, but as enemies. Even now, you refuse to see the root cause of the conflict between India and Pakistan. Who drew up India's and Pakistani borders? Answer: Britain when they partitioned the country.
    2
  11213.  @ArmenFirmen  If you claim Uighurs are persecuted by Chinese authority, then why does Chinese media celebrate Uighur culture? Uighurs in Xinjiang can be seen dressed in traditional clothing, celebrating Uighur traditions, Uighur cuisine, singing Uighur songs, dancing and playing traditional Uighur instruments.
    2
  11214.  @DonAl_Capone  You said: "神州 Shenzhou India and Pakistan do not have a shared history." Pakistan and India do have a shared history right up to 1937. Pakistan was previously part of British India (much like Bangladesh was). It's the colonial mentality that's trying to divide the people in South Asia.
    2
  11215.  @vikasthakur2139  "神州 Shenzhou Why british had taken permission from china." Because British had recognized China's suzerainty over Tibet in the 1907 Convention Between Great Britain and Russia. The Governments of Great Britain and Russia recognizing the suzerain rights of China in Thibet. Article II. In conformity with the admitted principle of the suzerainty of China over Thibet, Great Britain and Russia engage not to enter into negotiations with Thibet except through the intermediary of the Chinese Government.
    2
  11216.  @MarkYeung1  "Meanwhile, two-way trade between Russia and China in 2022 reaches ¥1.69 trillion (US$ 235.9 billion)," China's trade with USA reached $758.4 billion in 2022, which is more than Russia's trade with China in 2022 so does that mean China is more aligned with USA than with Russia? Of course not. Your comparison using trade doesn't make sense.
    2
  11217.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "The USA is not at war." The US is at war with Syria, Yemen, etc. what are you talking about? USA recently launched Operation Prosperity Guardian in the Red Sea and have launched missiles against the Houthis. "If USA and Russia are at war, which side's economy would China choose?" That depends on how the war started. Otherwise, China would most likely be a neutral party and continue trading with both sides just like what China is doing with Ukraine and Russia.
    2
  11218.  @MarkYeung1  "And Ukrainians can see that and they're entitled to their feelings." As are Chinese and Indians. If Zelenskyy's advisor can make such derogatory remarks about the intellectual potential of Chinese and Indians, then why should Chinese and Indians support Ukraine? At least Russian officials don't make such remarks towards China and India.
    2
  11219.  @MarkYeung1  "Shenzhou. USA is not at war with Syria." The government of Syria does not approve of the presence of US troops in its territory, how is that not at war? Also, the US is technically still at war with North Korea, since there's no peace treaty signed to signal an end to the Korean War. You said: "USA is also not at war with Russia." But you asked me the question "If USA and Russia are at war, which side's economy would China choose?" and I've answered succinctly. You said: "USA is attacking the Houthis" Where are the Houthis located? In Yemen, therefore isn't that an act of war?
    2
  11220.  @thisiskevin1000  About the Soviet Union, back in 1917, Russia was once the poorest country in Europe under a corrupt Tsar regime, but after the communist revolution by the Bolsheviks, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become the strongest country in Europe, both economically and militarily (that's why NATO was formed).
    2
  11221.  @Dr_stone666  The Chinese government rushed to built a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised. Video: Huoshenshan: the hospital built in 10 days in China over coronavirus outbreak youtu.be/l2QfufpwfdY Kudos to the Chinese construction workers who worked hard to build those hospitals. China also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. Video: Time-lapse video shows how Leishenshan hospital completed in 12 days youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk But what's India doing to contain the virus?
    2
  11222.  @Renaissance861  Italian Doctor Giuseppe Remuzzi (the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan) said that he found evidence of Covid-19 in Northern Italy (Lombardy) since November 2019, which was before the outbreak began in Wuhan, so why are you calling it our disease? Even till today, scientists are unable to establish the true origin of Covid-19.
    2
  11223.  @riteshgoel5750  Dr Li Wenliang was spreading rumours about the coronavirus being SARS (which is clearly untrue, Covid-19 is not SARS) so the government stepped in to stop the spread of unproven rumours that's all. And who said that Chinese Communist Party detained him and tortured him? Dr Li only signed a document not to spread unproven rumours and he returned to work shortly afterwards. What makes you think he was detained and tortured? China had informed WHO of a new coronavirus strain back in 31st Dec 2019, and by 11th January 2020, China had sequenced Covid-19 genome and shared the information with WHO, so why makes you think China did not inform WHO until mid-January?
    2
  11224.  @Dr_stone666  China has embarked on clinical trial for coronavirus vaccine Source: China embarks on clinical trial for coronavirus vaccine straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/china-embarks-on-clinical-trial-for-coronavirus-vaccine
    2
  11225.  @Renaissance861  "神州 Shenzhou he was bribed by the chicoms" Where's your proof he was bribed?
    2
  11226.  @Renaissance861  Why resort to hurling racist insults (like chinass nincompoop) against me for my views, just because mine happens to differ from yours? I don't resort to hurling personal insults against you for your views, I asked for proof, but you resort to personal insults, when you lacking evidence of your own?
    2
  11227. Mickey G Africa is quite rich in resources and raw materials, but until Africans learn how to effectively harness it themselves, its resources will remain inaccessible, and African nations will continue remain poor as result. It's no use blaming other countries for making use of resources that African countries are unable to make use of themselves. China imports raw materials from Africa and exports finished goods to Africa, simply because Africans unable to make those same products themselves. But does that mean that Africans do not benefit from this arrangement? Africans still get access to technology like mobile phones, computers, electronic appliances and so on. They are not at the stage where they can make their own goods, but at least the roads and infrastructure form the basis of eventual African industrialization. After China build those infrastructure, many overseas educated Africans are returning home to develop their homeland. It should also be noted that unlike Western colonialism, African nations are not being forced to do business with China and Africans still have negotiating power over their own resources, unlike with Western colonialism. Western powers have been one-sidedly looting Africa for centuries, whereas Chinese arrangement is mutually beneficial for decades.
    2
  11228. From Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) it appears that the sex was consensual, since she had previously known Zhang Gaoli before he became vice premier. She wrote: "You said in those seven years, you never forgot about me, and you will treat me well etc... I was terrified and anxious. Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed*... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I *renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well." She's clearly had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, but there wasn't any suggestion of sexual assault in her post.
    2
  11229.  @zackk4969  It's the Western country's athletes loss if the Western countries decide to boycott the 2022 Beijing Olympics. More gold medals for China, Russia and other countries then.
    2
  11230.  @MarkYeung1  "Shenzhou. China thinks the 2 Republics should belong to Ukraine." Where does China say that? And the argument was about stalemate, but what stalemate are you talking about when Ukraine cannot retake Crimea and the two republics?
    2
  11231.  @Notorious_biggest  The Chinese government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and halt production, close tourist attractions, imposing lockdown, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and contain the virus. Now it's finally paying off as the virus is under control and China is reopening our economy. But in Western countries like US and UK, their economies are far *too precious to sacrifice *so human health has to be sacrificed instead. Trump wants to reopen the economy by Easter and Boris Johnson is relying on "herd immunity" to pull through. So human health has to be sacrificed instead of the economy.
    2
  11232.  @Notorious_biggest  China is sending medical supplies and medical experts to countries hit by COVID-19. Source: China sends medical supplies, experts to help Italy battle coronavirus uk.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-italy-respirators/china-sends-medical-supplies-experts-to-help-italy-battle-coronavirus-idUKKBN2101IM Source: China delivers first batch of medical supplies to Iran news.cgtn.com/news/2020-02-29/China-delivers-first-batch-of-medical-supplies-to-Iran-OtyUa6M4Cs/index.html Source: China donates medical supplies to Philippines to combat COVID-19 china.org.cn/world/Off_the_Wire/2020-03/21/content_75842380.htm Source: China flies more medical supplies to Indonesia thejakartapost.com/news/2020/03/24/china-flies-more-medical-supplies-to-indonesia.html
    2
  11233.  @Notorious_biggest  Technological innovation has enabled a company in Guangdong to produce 1,000 face masks in one minute. Video: Ultra-high-speed Mask Production Line Put into Use in south China City youtube.com/watch?v=_jWt-4YKBq4
    2
  11234.  @Notorious_biggest  China had given Spain a list of approved Chinese suppliers to buy from, but Spain choose to buy from unapproved company, Bioeasy which wasn't on the list of approved vendors. So why blame China when Spain choose to buy from unapproved vendor that's not on the list?
    2
  11235.  @seasant6  Beijing is listening to those complaints and have taken steps to rectify the issue. Russian biathlete Valeria Vasnetsova was initially complaining about insufficient food served her Covid-19 quarantine, but two days after her rant, her meals have since improved. Russia's biathlon team spokesperson said her meals now include salmon, cucumbers, sausages and yoghurt and that the biathlete was already smiling.
    2
  11236. Don't be discouraged Andy. Even if out of a thousand anti-China people, if you managed to convince a single one to rethink his/her anti-China views, and to seek out more information about China apart from what the anti-China Western MSM says, it's a already a small victory in itself.
    2
  11237.  @u.a5351  It's our country, our rules. I remember that even the United States separates parents from kids by deporting more than half a million parents who were illegal immigrants, since 2009 according to Washington Post.
    2
  11238.  @fukushimaisrevelation2817  During the 19th century, Britain had air pollution problems, there was even a Great Smog of London. During the 20th century, Americans were also not happy about the Industrial pollution in the 1960, but since then, Britain and America have cleaned up their air quality. Whereas China only industrialized some 50 years ago in comparison, so of course there will be pollution as a byproduct of industrialization. But give it a few more decades and China would have cleaned up our air, just like the USA and UK did for theirs. For example, China built the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy. This makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity. Countries by Hydropower electricity 2018 1. China (1,229 TWh) 2. Brazil (414 TWh) 3. Canada (382 TWh) 4. USA (294 TWh) 5. Russia (184 TWh) 6. Norway (139 TWh) 7. India (130 TWh) 8. Japan (88 TWh) 9. Venezuela (70 TWh) 10. France (62 TWh)
    2
  11239.  @fukushimaisrevelation2817  China is continually building new hydroelectric sources right now even as we speak. Apart from the Three Gorges Dam (world's largest hydroelectric power station) China also recently unveiled the world's 2nd largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Baihetan Dam (白鹤滩大坝) in southwest China's Sichuan. There are videos available on YouTube on China's hydroelectric powerstations. China not only dominates hydropower, but China also dominates solar power. China is the world's largest producer of solar panels as well as being the world leader in its deployment. Here's a list of countries by solar power generation List of Countries by Solar Power Generation in 2018 1. China (177,500 GWh) 2. United States (97,118 GWH) 3. Japan (71,688 GWH) 4. Germany (46,164 GWH) 5. India (30,732 GWH) 6. Italy (23,230 GWH) 7. United Kingdom (12,921 GWH) 8. Spain (12,520 GWH) 9. Australia (12,081 GWH) ...
    2
  11240.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Polls show that majority of Canadians support diplomatic boycott of the Olympics." But for what reason? Because the Justin Trudeau government is emulating the Joe Biden administration in “taking the same measure as the US," and denying any diplomatic presence in Beijing? But the Biden administration just flipped on their stance to not send officials, yet Canada just blindly follow the stance to not send diplomats?
    2
  11241.  @ewchi-m4n012  Well in that case, currently the territory of the Tibet Autonomous Region is part of the People's Republic of China today, as recognized by the UN countries.
    2
  11242.  @ewchi-m4n012  Again, how is Taiwan doing better than the mainland? Mainland China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers. Taiwan used to be one of Four Asian Tigers but since democracy was introduced to Taiwan, it's economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving for jobs in the mainland or Singapore Video: How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents | Insight | CNA Insider "From the '90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreements on policy matters. This produced less effective policy making. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be more conservative in Taiwan, so they do not enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou, Research Fellow, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica. ... Video: How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents | Insight | CNA Insider
    2
  11243.  @ewchi-m4n012  Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to mainland China? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland? Yet you still claim that Taiwan is doing better than the mainland?
    2
  11244.  @ewchi-m4n012  Besides smartphones, Chinese companies also dominate the civilian drone industry and Chinese company DJI is world's largest civilian drone-maker according to the following source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland? Yet you still claim that Taiwan doing better than the mainland?
    2
  11245.  @ewchi-m4n012  About computers, China is home to many of the world's fastest supercomputers, such as the Sunway TaihuLight (神威·太湖之光) that was once the world's fastest supercomputer in 2018. China also dominated the list of top 500 world's fastest supercomputers. Distribution of supercomputers in the TOP500 list by country (as of November 2021 1. China (173) 2. United States (149) 3. Japan (32) 4. Germany (26) 5. France (19) 6. Canada (11) 7. United Kingdom (11) 8. South Korea (7) 9. Russia (7) 10. Italy (6) ... Source: TOP500 But where are all the supercomputers by Taiwan as compared to mainland China? How can Taiwan hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland? And yet you claim Taiwan island is doing better than the mainland?
    2
  11246.  @ewchi-m4n012  China has also produced many successful Internet companies like Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, JD, ByteDance (Tik Tok), Meituan, Suning dotcom, Shein, NetEase, Kwai, Pinduoduo, Trip dotcom, Sina Corp, and many more. ... Source: Wikipedia: List of largest Internet companies But where are the famous Internet companies from Taiwan to compare with the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland? Yet you claim Taiwan island is doing better than the mainland? Even in terms of politics, Taiwan just recently lost influence as the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua switched their recognition of Taipei to Beijing.
    2
  11247.  @ewchi-m4n012  China's Sunway Taihulight supercomputer was built using homegrown technology. Apart from fast supercomputers, mainland China also has the world's largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen and Taiwan's hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are very fast, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even successfully balanced a coin on its edge while in a train traveling at 350 kph for a long period of time. High Speed Railway (HSR) Construction by Country in 2019 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. France (3,870 km) 4. Germany (3,596 km) 5. Japan (3,422 km) 6. Russia (2,026 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,997 km) 8. Italy (1,697 km) 9. South Korea (1,481 km) 10. Finland (744 km) ... Source: Video: High-Speed Railway (HSR) Construction by Country (1965-2019) Yet you claim Taiwan is doing better than the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    2
  11248.  @ewchi-m4n012  China actually bought an estimated 1.1 trillion dollars ($1,100,000,000,000) worth of U.S debt to help the U.S tide itself over the 2008 financial crisis. And according to Fortune Global 500, an annual ranking of the top 500 corporations worldwide as measured by revenue, Chinese companies dominate the list. Top 10 countries with the highest revenues top 500 companies, as of August 2021 according to Fortune Magazine. 1. China (135) 2. United States (126) 3. Japan (53) 4. France (28) 5. Germany (27) 6. United Kingdom (22) 7. South Korea (15) 8. Switzerland (13) 9. Canada (12) 10. Netherlands (11) ... Source: Wikipedia: Fortune Global 500 But where are the famous companies from Taiwan island as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland? Yet you claim Taiwan is doing better than the mainland?
    2
  11249.  @ewchi-m4n012  Because it appears you cannot sufficiently explain how exactly is Taiwan island doing better than the mainland. I've repeatedly ask you for famous companies from Taiwan, and thus far, you only named a handful at the most, whereas Chinese companies are dominating virtually every list there is.
    2
  11250.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou ctrl c + ctrl v" I cited numerous sources where possible to support my arguments about Chinese companies dominating various industries, yet you still claim Taiwan is doing better than the mainland, without really citing anything substantial to support your arguments. Instead, you accuse me of copying-and-pasting.
    2
  11251.  @ewchi-m4n012  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space Not even Taiwan island has send people into space. Yet you claim Taiwan is doing better than the mainland?
    2
  11252.  @ewchi-m4n012  Here are the Top 10 countries/regions with the highest number of billionaires: 1. United States - 724 2. China - 698 (626 mainland, 71 Hong Kong, 1 Macau) 3. India - 140 4. Germany - 136 5. Russia - 117 6. Hong Kong - 71 7. Brazil - 65 8. Canada - 64 9. United Kingdom - 56 10. Italy - 51 ... Source: Forbes Magazine Yet you claim Taiwan is doing better than mainland China?
    2
  11253.  @ewchi-m4n012  As for visitors, China was the world's 4th most visited destination according to World Tourism Rankings. Most visited destinations by international tourist arrivals 1. France (89.4 million) 2. Spain (82.8 million) 3. United States (79.7 million) 4. China (62.9 million) 5. Italy (61.6 million) 6. Turkey (45.8 million) 7. Mexico (41.3 million) 8. Thailand (38.2 million) 9. Germany (38.9 million) 10. United Kingdom (38.7 million) ... Source: World Tourism rankings In the Asia-Pacific region, mainland China was also the most visited destination. Asia-Pacific Region 1. China (62.9 million) 2. Thailand (38.2 million) 3. Japan (31.2 million) 4. Malaysia (25.8 million) 5. Hong Kong, China (29.3 million) 6. Macau, China (18.5 million) 7. Vietnam (15.5 million) 8. India (17.4 million) 9. South Korea (15.3 million) 10. Indonesia (13.4 million) Yet you claim Taiwan is doing better than the mainland?
    2
  11254.  @ewchi-m4n012  But negotiations had indeed taken place between mainland China and the United Kingdom, that's why the U.K does not recognize Taiwan, instead it recognizes Beijing as the capital of China. The U.K also adheres to the One China policy that Taiwan is part of China, and Taiwan is unable to get the U.K to recognize Taiwan, so what more needs to be said? Taiwan is clearly not an independent country if they allow mainland China to dictate their foreign policy as I have shown.
    2
  11255.  @ewchi-m4n012  But once again, selling arms to a certain region does not necessarily prove that the region is an independent country, and I've already gone over the various points in which Taiwan is not an independent country. Even the fact that polls have revealed that only a small minority (5.6%) want independence and that the vast majority (87%) want to maintain the status quo (that Taiwan is part of China) shows that Taiwan do not seek independence and any move to declare independence is seen as changing the status quo. You said: "And china has sold weapons to many guerilla groups and rebelions all around the world," Could you cite me one example of China selling weapons to such guerilla groups?
    2
  11256.  @ewchi-m4n012  Since you said: "I know you chinese had idealized this thing for years." then I take it you are not Chinese yourself, then what is your purpose in supporting Taiwan independence? Mainland China has made it clear that military action would be taken against Taiwan if they declare independence, and polls have shown that only a minority want independence. You literally have no dog in this fight, you're just seemingly egging on Taiwan separatists to do something that they'll end up regretting.
    2
  11257.  @ewchi-m4n012  I suggest you look up former Taiwan TV host, Dr. Huang Chih-Hsien who has had her Taiwan citizenship revoked in 2019 because she expressed her "pro-reunification" view. Taiwan may not be the Western democracy that many in the West think it is.
    2
  11258.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou think what u want bro, as i say, part of china but never a sole country," Well, exactly my point, Taiwan is part of China and never it's own sole country. I'm glad that you have come to this agreement at least that Taiwan is not an independent country. You said: "u are insulting ur own people refering them as dirt poor, starving peasants," Because that's what the communists were, and they were up against one of the most well-funded, well-armed armies that is the KMT during the Chinese Civil War. And yet the communists emerged victorious in the mainland, then isn't this an example of David versus Goliath? How is that insulting?
    2
  11259.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  So if Peng Shuai accuses a high ranking communist member of sexual assault, then may I ask if there's evidence available? From what I understand, even CNN can't independently verify Peng Shuai's claims.
    2
  11260.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  From what I understand, the Western legal system assumes that a suspect is innocent until proven guilty, yet when it comes to China, why are Western MSM seemingly claiming China is guilty until proven innocent?
    2
  11261.  Maria Aldery  US-China relations are deteriorating, potentially leading to outright war and Cyrus Janssen is fighting for peace by pushing back against the Western MSM narrative, yet you rather resort to personal insults against him for his peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls"? If the Chinese government is somehow paying people to promote that message then isn't that a positive thing for the world? To desire peace instead of war?
    2
  11262. Indeed, I would love for Cyrus to talk about Chinese history before 1978. Chairman Mao made numerous contributions to China, but this has often been neglected in Western discourse. Many expats today know about modern China after Deng Xiaoping's reforms in the late 1970s but few know about Mao Zedong's contributions to China before that.
    2
  11263.  @Grendelmonster8u  Ancient Chinese were using paper banknotes long before Americans even used cash. Also, use of credit cards didn't meant that Americans were rich. Credit cards were invented so that after a worker spends his last paycheck and runs out of cash, they can continue spending beyond their means thanks to the inventions of the credit card. That's how debts get racked up.
    2
  11264.  @Grendelmonster8u  You said: "If I text that government is bad and should be overthrown or make fun of the government, I’m not going arrested or scolded." Tell that to Julian Assange and Edward Snowden.
    2
  11265.  Tom Collins  Source: Huawei overtakes Apple as world No. 2 smartphone seller reuters.com/article/us-huawei-revenue-idUSKBN1KL0BN
    2
  11266.  @matthewmorgan7106  About Communism versus Capitalism, it's no secret today that Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. That's because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, hospitals, schools, for everyone on Earth. Yet we still have starving people, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to affordable healthcare. Because capitalism means that the goods/services go towards the one able to pay for them. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." The Earth's resources are finite and capitalism is exhausting its resources, whereas communism seeks to better distribute the limited resources available according to needs.
    2
  11267.  @matthewmorgan7106  Look at Russia and back in 1917, Russia was once the poorest country in Europe under the corrupt Tsar regime, but after the communist revolution by the Bolsheviks, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become the strongest country in Europe surpassing it's neighbours both economically and militarily (that's why NATO was formed). And it was achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
    2
  11268.  Gaylord Manlove  Source: German IT watchdog says 'no evidence' of Huawei spying thelocal.de/20181216/german-it-watchdog-says-no-evidence-of-huawei-spying Germany's IT watchdog has expressed scepticism about calls for a boycott of Chinese telecoms giant Huawei, saying it has seen no evidence the firm could use its equipment to spy for Beijing, news weekly Spiegel reported. "For such serious decisions like a ban, you need proof," the head of Germany's Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Arne Schönbohm, told Spiegel, adding that his agency had no such evidence.
    2
  11269.  Gaylord Manlove  About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    2
  11270.  @matthewmorgan7106  Why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, and supports the communists right to rule the mainland. I mean, you're talking about a hypothetical scenario had the communists not succeeded, yet the KMT still lost the mainland to the CPC. And you still say that China will be far more powerful, technologically advanced fairer and more harmonious? Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: White Terror (Taiwan) wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Terror_(Taiwan) But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Source: Taiwan Miracle wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_Miracle Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Now Taiwan's economy is stagnant, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising, and Taiwan graduates are leaving the island to seek jobs in mainland China or Singapore.
    2
  11271. In China, the Chinese government controls the Chinese companies for China's benefit, reining in companies when they gone too far. In the United States, the U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    2
  11272. Can't tell if kaspetto really means it, or is being sarcastic.
    2
  11273. Agreed. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today.
    2
  11274.  @dyong888  It's part of the "cancel culture" phenomena that's pervading society today. A long-term subscriber or supporter, cancelling subscription or withdrawing support based to someone based on a political stance he or she took.
    2
  11275.  @Kevin-sc3ro  Beijing won the bid to host the 2022 Winter Olympics, then what seems to be the problem with Beijing hosting the Olympics? It's your athletes loss if your countries choose to boycott the 2022 Beijing Olympics. More gold medals for China then.
    2
  11276.  @Kevin-sc3ro  Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that the cost of living in the USA is lower than it would be. Think a about the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent elsewhere on things like cars, housing, luxury goods, rent, tuition fees and so on. Isn't that why many Americans often flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money?
    2
  11277.  @fireturkeyfly11  The Great Chinese Famine was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in mass starvation. In 1958, the Yellow River flooded which coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. In July 1958, the peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 m3/s (790,000 cu ft/s) with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kg/m3 (57 lb/cu ft), 14× and 24× their mean annual values, respectively. This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages and was reported as the most severe flood since 1933.
    2
  11278.  @fireturkeyfly11  Under Chairman Mao, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Under Mao Zedong, China's growth in life expectancy at birth nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980. Infant mortality under Mao nearly halved, and iliteracy rates nearly halved. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%.
    2
  11279.  @hannesRSA  How is China bankrupting countries and taking their infrastructure? Chinese President Xi Jinping has pledged to waive debts for the least developed African countries that have both high debt burdens and diplomatic ties with China. Speaking at the opening of a summit with African leaders in Beijing, Xi said his country would offer an extra $US60 billion ($83 billion) in financing to African countries. Source: China waives debt, promises 'no imposition of will' on African nations smh.com.au/world/asia/china-waives-debt-promises-no-imposition-of-will-on-african-nations-20180904-p501nr.html "In addition, for Africa's least developed countries, heavily indebted and poor countries, landlocked developing countries and small island developing countries that have diplomatic relations with China, the debt they have incurred in the form of interest-free Chinese government loans due to mature by the end of 2018 will be exempted," Xi said.
    2
  11280.  @karmayeshi5042  You're accusing me of being brainwashed? Have you actually been to Tibet yourself? Here's a vlog by Canadian tourist (Vafa Anderson) in Lhasa in 2016. He took the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) and explains how each carriage comes equipped with its own emergency oxygen tank, because of the low-oxygen environments in the mountainous Himalayas. Video: Welcome to Lhasa youtu.be/J-TfN56ETVM (by Vafa Anderson) In the video, you can see many religious Tibetans praying, performing full-body kowtows, and spinning those "prayer tops" in their hands, and he also introduced the audience to Tibetan cuisine in Lhasa.
    2
  11281. Why are people so interested in where Cyrus receives money from? Are you like his tax collector or something?
    2
  11282.  @eugenenieh8930  I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for the best experience.)
    2
  11283. The Chinese Communist Party has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc, to map out China's direction and future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc, and set specific goals for China to achieve by then. For example: -China plans to eliminate poverty and become innovation hub by 2020. -China plans to world leader in Artificial Intelligence systems by 2030. -China plans to ban fossil fuels, and non-electric cars by 2040 -China plans to have a military force equal to that of USA by 2050. Source: Xi Plans to Turn China Into a Leading Global Power by 2050 bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-11-23/china-chopstick-debacle-puts-dolce-gabbana-s-future-at-stake But what does Taiwan government plan for the island in 10 years time? Taiwan leaders can't be leaders forever so they need to step down eventually, and therefore, Taiwan only makes short term plans instead of long term.
    2
  11284. Taiwan's pro-independence DPP just suffered major lost in the midterm elections yesterday, so doesn't this show that the people of Taiwan don't want independence? Even the pro-independence Taiwan President Tsai just tendered her resignation after this humiliating defeat!
    2
  11285. China built two of the world's fastest supercomputers Sunway TaihuLight 神威·太湖之光 and Tianhe-2 天河-2 and in 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers as compared to USA's 144 out 500. China surpasses USA in Supercomputer usage on Top 500 list cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/
    2
  11286.  Tee Tee  I at least had hopes for Singapore government to make a wise strategic decision, but it appears that even Singapore's government has been duped by Western anti-Russian propaganda. I heard Singapore slapped sanctions on Russian banks.
    2
  11287.  @hangtuah888  Agreed. I could also make the same argument for the Singapore government being mostly dominated by a single race (i.e Singaporean Chinese). But I had hopes that Singapore government were smarter than that, and have long shrugged off the "colonial mentality" (that you mentioned earlier). I have great respect for the views of Kishore Mabubani (who's originally of Pakistani descent) but it seems like the "decolonization of the mind" still isn't complete in either Singapore or Malaysia. Russia and China (and also credit to India for abstaining from the UN vote) are fighting for a more multi-polar world dominated by different voices, rather than the current uni-polar world dominated by USA and the West. I hope more ASEAN country's governments watch Brian's channel and learn about the geopolitics that's affecting the region.
    2
  11288. ​ @roby7444  "神州 Shenzhou Australia has alot of uranium" But does Australia have the necessary uranium enrichment technology to refine nuclear fuel for its subs? Also, Australia is a non-nuclear country, so any transfer of such technology or sales of nuclear materials would be in violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty.
    2
  11289.  @MarkYeung1  "For example, none of the NATO members militarily help Britain during the Falkland War in 1982." Because neither side had formally declared war on each other. If there was a formal declaration of war, then Finland and Sweden would have to participate in NATO's next war.
    2
  11290. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  11291. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    2
  11292. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  11293. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    2
  11294. 觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    2
  11295. 觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  11296.  @migrisongs7439  Is India comfortable with Canada?
    2
  11297.  @andrenogueira5058  You boasted earlier that "In Western countries you are not kidnaped, tortured, murdered for disagreeing." yet I have already proven your statement wrong with the case of Assange. He exposed the crimes committed by the West, yet it was he who was punished for revealing this info. Assange is kept in horrible conditions in a U.K prison and his wife and family are not allowed to visit him. His appearance is described as being haggard, and the decline in his mental health is putting him at risk of potential suicide. And this is happening a Western country, even as we speak.
    2
  11298.  @MarkYeung1  Industry statistics to show that lobster producers in Australia are selling millions of dollars’ worth of the crustaceans to China. Figures released by the Western Rock Lobster Council (representing a major Australian lobster producer) have shown a sharp rise in exports of 300 tonnes of lobsters from Western Australia to China. Also, you said "China’s government imposed tariffs of 116–218% on bottled Australian wine imports through 2026." but that's tariffs NOT sanctions, and you can still buy Australian wine in China.
    2
  11299.  @rais1953  You said: "but there is widespread opposition to it in Australia." Polls indicate that around 70% of Australians support acquiring nuclear submarines under AUKUS. Lowy's poll found 33% of respondents were "strongly in favor" of Australia obtaining the submarines, while another 37% were "somewhat in favor." Only 11% were "strongly against" the move while 17% were "somewhat against" it. This is despite the fact that China is Australia's biggest trading partner, yet Australia is hopping on board the U.S anti-China stance without regard for Australia's own interests.
    2
  11300.  @andrenogueira5058  You boasted earlier that "In Western countries you are not kidnaped, tortured, murdered for disagreeing." yet I have already proven your statement wrong with the case of Assange.
    2
  11301.  @andrenogueira5058  If you want to talk about prison populations, then it's actually the United States that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate, and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity, that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back onto the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Funny thing you said about poetry, China is literally promoting Chinese poetry by launching a "Read a Poem" campaign. You said: "Even those poor medical staff that warned about the virus were immediately kidnaped and a poet was summoned to the police and her social networks' accounts totally erased." What's the name of the medical staff that warned about the virus? As far as I know, China had reported a mysterious pneumonia-like illness in Dec 2019 to the WHO. By 5th Jan 2020, China had identified the specific strain out of millions in record time, and by 12 Jan 2020, China had sequenced its genome in record time and shared the information with the rest of the world. Whats the name of the poet who was summoned to the police and her social network accounts erased?
    2
  11302.  @rais1953  Agreed. Have you seen the AUKUS Parody Video by thejuicemedia? Australia is unable to fuel, maintain or deploy nuclear subs, so Scot Morrison literally chained Australia's long-term defense policy to the United States.
    2
  11303. @Chew The U.S is setting a trap by playing the Taiwan card, so mainland China needs to proceed cautiously to avoid falling into it. Your reasons (1) and (2) indicate that U.S is in decline and will eventually wane to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise, by which then support for Taiwan independence would evaporate. And the reason for (3) is because Taiwan has (perceived) U.S support, but once that dries up, all those provocations and bullying would amount to nothing as long as mainland China doesn't get provoked.
    2
  11304. He's been impeached twice, sentenced to 40 over counts of felony and now this. What else are they going to throw at him next?
    2
  11305. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    2
  11306.  @youtubeshadowbannedme  Have you actually been to Xinjiang and see how prosperous it is? Here's a short 1-min clip of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China. Video: Drone Aerial Night View of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China youtu.be/MkhORviAhDI
    2
  11307.  @Ethan-vj5mt  Here's the full 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China. Video: 新疆乌鲁木齐灯光秀抖音首发 youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA
    2
  11308. Come to think of it, all those news about "user's data leaks and privacy being compromised" stem from Western social media like Facebook (Meta), Twitter, Instagram, etc.
    2
  11309. +Ranvir Singh CPEC projects create more than 30,000 jobs for Pakistani workers so why is that a bad thing for China to invest in developing Pakistan? Pakistan is India's "brother" created back when British India was first partitioned, so why continue fighting among yourselves? India even support Bangladesh independence from East Pakistan, which is why Pakistan is suspicious of India's intent. CPEC offers a rare opportunity for both your countries to finally mend your relations and contribute to building up Pakistan's economy. China and India are both Pakistan's neighbors, so why do you want to see the country fail? If Pakistan collapse, both China and India will be flooded by refugees.
    2
  11310.  @dannyw985  Imperial Japan censored information of Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings from reaching it's frontline troops and breaking morale. By bombing the Japanese cities, USA mostly killed Japanese civilians, women, children, the elderly, men unfit for active military duty, whereas the vast majority of Japanese military strength remained unaffected.
    2
  11311. Is your profile pic an Indian flag 🇮🇳 shaped like a coronavirus particle?
    2
  11312. The 19th Century belonged to Britain. The 20th Century belonged to the U.S The 21st Century will inevitably belong to China.
    2
  11313.  JarJarBinks  China is investing Artificial Intelligence and we even tested AI judge via chat app. Video: AI judges via chat app: the brave new world of China's digital courts youtu.be/yuUN6VfWF-Q Artificial-intelligence judges, cyber-courts, and verdicts delivered on chat apps – China is encouraging digitization to streamline case-handling within its sprawling court system using cyberspace and technologies like blockchain and cloud computing.
    2
  11314.  JarJarBinks  About Artificial Intelligence systems, China recently unveiled the world's first AI news anchor. Video: World's first AI news anchor debuts in China youtu.be/MHPI1uH9llU Video: Xinhua unveils world's first female AI news anchor youtu.be/5iZuffHPDAw
    2
  11315.  Damian609  You seem to anti-government in your views, then perhaps consider this simple question: Who do you think is qualified to lead the country? The People or The Government? If you selected The People, then why do countries till need a government for?
    2
  11316.  Damian609  About life-long leadership, US presidents eventually have to step down after 4-8 years when their term is over, and therefore they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. Look at America's long time problems, like its rising debt and healthcare costs, and no US president can possibly hope to solve America's woes in just 4-8 years. The presence of US term limits and lack of long-term plans is hindering America. Whereas in China, the Chinese government has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's direction and future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc, and to set specific goals for China to achieve. By abolishing the presidential term limit, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come into fruition in the future. -By 2020, China plans to eliminate poverty completely and establish moderately prosperous society. -By 2025, China plans to transform our manufacturing industry to incorporate high-end technology. -By 2030, China plans to be world leader in Artificial Intelligence -By 2035, China plans to be key innovative, scientific power and establish moderately socialist society. -By 2040, China plans to ban all fossil fuel powerplants and all non-electric vehicles for greener future. -By 2045, China plans to be world leading space nation, having established a space elevator. -By 2050, China plans to have surpassed the USA as global superpower, economically and militarily. Source: Xi Plans to Turn China Into a Leading Global Power by 2050 bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-17/xi-to-put-his-stamp-on-chinese-history-at-congress-party-opening So can't you see that term limits is actually bad for America, because it prevents your leaders from making long term plans? How to solve America's problems in just a mere 4-8 years? That's why most American leaders only tackle immediate problems faced by America, and ignore the long-term problems.
    2
  11317. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  11318. @Ben Shen Agreed that the society as a whole has to prove itself and China has done that. Modern China was built by the blood, tears and sacrifice of the Chinese people to turn China from dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, into an economic powerhouse, the world's factory (Made in China) a growing scientific and technological power today. While the Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again, which government body is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectancies across China, India, Europe and USA. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm And it had all been achieved under CCP leadership, despite Western anti-communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success.
    2
  11319. @HKZ P Those statistics were published by World Tourism Rankings and they themselves choose to include tourists from Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan in their findings. But does this mean that those territory are somehow not part of China?
    2
  11320. @HKZ P Which stuff did I make up? Actually China has so many successes, but many Western media refuse to acknowledge them, and constantly paint China in negative light. I mean, China has even sent people into space! In 2008, China conducted our very own "spacewalk" where a Chinese taikonaut (Chinese astronaut) left the interior of the Shenzhou-7 神舟-7 spacecraft and ventured into the vacuum of space. Video: China Shenzhou 7 Space Walk Live!! Full Success! youtube.com/watch?v=gMxQEHfU6hM China is the 3rd country in the world to independently send people into space, apart from USA and USSR. China is also the 1st in Asia to do so, and even Japan, Korea, India (and even Taiwan) have not conducted manned space missions of their own.
    2
  11321. Many Chinese are optimistic and look forward to a brighter future ahead. However, many in the West are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    2
  11322. I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumuqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang. Video:youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion:Watch in HD fullscreen for the best experience)
    2
  11323.  @xerozero976  US Dollar is global currency because USA is world's largest economy. But economists predict that China's economy will surpass the USA's in the foreseeable future, so by then, the Chinese Yuan would start to gain popularity.
    2
  11324. @Dio Y If Taiwan is the real China, then why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland and solidify the communists' right to rule the mainland.
    2
  11325.  @xerozero976  China actually bought an estimated 1.1 trillion dollars ($1,100,000,000,000) worth of U.S debt to help USA tide itself over the 2008 financial crisis. Source: China owns about $1.1 trillion in U.S. debt investopedia.com/articles/investing/080615/china-owns-us-debt-how-much.asp
    2
  11326. Indian government knows that once Bhutan gives up its territorial claims, Indian troops no longer have any reason to be on Chinese territory. Besides, investment in infrastructure will lead to better trade and relations between Bhutan and China.
    2
  11327.  @Vysair  Freedom to travel? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    2
  11328. China did even better, China did not found any overseas colonies, nor seized lands like what Western colonial powers did.
    2
  11329.  @yslee1401  Oh yes, Huawei is stopped from doing business with North Korea or Iran! Definitely not because the USA slapped sanctions on NK or Iran, oh not that! Canada is actually playing the hero and saving Meng from the evil clutches of the CPC after all! It all makes perfect sense now, why didn't I think up such a conspiracy theory myself?
    2
  11330.  @yslee1401  Source: In Philippines, police inquiry finds no evidence of Huawei spying for Beijing scmp.com/news/asia/southeast-asia/article/3011195/philippines-police-inquiry-finds-no-evidence-huawei-spying Philippine authorities on Tuesday said there was no evidence Huawei engages in spying for Beijing, based on the initial results of an inquiry into espionage allegations against the Chinese telecommunications giant.
    2
  11331.  @marcusrakyat8891  The 14th Dalai Lama was a traitor to his people and a CIA agent, being funded by CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas to oppose the mainland government.
    2
  11332. Good News, Gonzalo Lira is alive and well. Video:youtu.be/R2yeSOcNlgE
    2
  11333.  @xipingpingpooh2543 About 5G in China, China conducted the world's first 5G remote surgery on test animal. The doctor is located some 50km away from the operating theater, using robotic arms to operate on a test animal and remove its liver. Video: China completes world’s first 5G remote surgery in test on animal youtu.be/yFR61jjL1vo A surgery team from the Chinese PLA General Hospital conducted a liver removal on a laboratory animal by remotely controlling robotic arms via 5G technology. Video: Chinese medical team completes 5G-enabled remote surgery test youtu.be/vWRnGIcUp4M 5G technology has been successfully used in a remote animal surgery experiment. In the operation, doctors in Beijing (北京) offered guidance to surgeons in Suzhou (苏州) city more than 1,000km away. Two surgeons used the 5G network to control a mechanical arm in an operation on an animal. The surgery took 60 minutes and was described as safe and smooth. Video: 5G Technology used in remote surgery experiment in China youtu.be/R3hDzwO3wSo This is a world first, and no other country has performed remote surgery over a 5G network as China has done so far.
    2
  11334.  @xipingpingpooh2543  Huawei has unveiled its new Kirin 990 chipset, the world's first 5G-integrated chipset, at the IFA (Internationale Funkausstellung Berlin) 2019 in Berlin, Germany on Friday. Video: Huawei introduces Kirin 990, the world's first 5G-integrated chipset youtu.be/TNKtG3t22Po The Kirin 990 series includes two models, the Kirin 990 and the Kirin 990 5G. The Kirin 990 5G is the smallest and one of the most energy-efficient 5G mobile phone chips in the industry.
    2
  11335.  @blimpusa  I spoke Mandarin in Hong Kong and some Hong Kong people treated me coldly. But when I open my mouth and speak English, many Hong Kong people started warming up.
    2
  11336.  @Yellow1964  You said: "many billionaires, even more than US." That is False. The USA has more billionaires than China. Here's a list of countries by number of billionaires and USA has more billionaires than China. Per Forbes 1. United States (614 billionaires) 2. China (389 billionaires) 3. Germany (107 billionaires) 4. India (102 billionaires) 5. Russia (99 billionaires) ... Per Business Insider (2020) 1. United States (585 billionaires) 2. China (373 billionaires) 3. Germany (123 billionaires) 4. India (119 billionaires) 5. Russia (10 billionaires) ... Source: List of countries by number of billionaires wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_billionaires
    2
  11337. The world's largest open-air concentration camp has morphed into a death camp.
    2
  11338.  @wynnhorton1208  Native Americans are also a backwards lot, but Caucasian Americans still integrate them into American culture isn't it? And leaving the Uighurs alone and walling Xinjiang off doesn't solve the problem, instead it probably exacerbate the situation, by allowing Xinjiang to become festering haven for Islamic radicals, in which to launch terrorist attacks against the mainland. So why should China follow your suggestion? And just because Tibetans are not Han, does not mean that they aren't Chinese citizens. Look at America and USA has Caucasian Americans (white), African Americans (black), Latin Americans (brown), Asian Americans (yellow) and Native Americans (red) and they are all Americans. Similarly, China has over 50 ethnic groups including Han, Tibetan, Uighur, Manchu, Mongolians, and even some Koreans in Northeastern China. But as long as they are born on Chinese soil, they are all Chinese nationals isn't it?
    2
  11339.  @bunnie1294  Exactly. Many of these anti-China people haven't even set foot into China and see what life is like here for themselves, yet they already hate China, because the biased Western media consistently paint a negative image of our country.
    2
  11340. +Zhaoxun Yan 说得好，他可能是美分。
    2
  11341.  @mrkaizagaming2652  If you don't want Wikipedia, another article entitled The Treaty Limits of the Philippines (By ResearchGate) also shows Philippines maritime boundary in the Treaty of Paris and it DOES NOT include the South China Sea Islands as within Philippine territory.
    2
  11342.  @axisense8651  I've got the guts to present China's point of view regarding the South China Sea issue. The Philippines parked a rusty vessel in the Second Thomas Shoal in order to stake a claim, periodically sending in supply ships to reinforce the decaying hull of the Sierra Madre. How's that following the rule of law?
    2
  11343.  Andrew Ski  Michael Spavors has been convicted with espionage charges and sentenced to 11 years in jail. Michael Korvig has also been charged with espionage. It's clearly different from the "kidnapping" of Meng Wanzhou by Canadian authorities.
    2
  11344.  @edwardspriggs5076  What's your assessment then?
    2
  11345.  @lisaedwards1359  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    2
  11346.  @laserraiset3300  In all your posts, all you seem to do is look down on China's achievements that's all.
    2
  11347.  @bockscar1  I have read your source, and it says that "the enemy has begun to employ a new and most cruel bomb, the power of which to do damage is, indeed, incalculable, taking the toll of many innocent lives" but nowhere does it explicitly say that it is referencing the the atomic bombings of Japanese cities. You are just inserting your own assumptions here and passing it off as truth that's all.
    2
  11348.  @freedomlife3623  "More people aware of the Taiwan situation and support your country" Actually, most countries in the world recognize Taiwan as part of China. Even just recently, the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua switch recognition of Taipei to Beijing.
    2
  11349.  @Apollonos  "神州 Shenzhou Of course the CCP is not to blame for the weather, but it is responsible for the poorly built dams that are collapsing and drowning hundreds of people. The CCP allows corrupt contractors to save money by building weak dams with too much sand and not enough concrete." Do you have evidence that those dams are poorly built? Dams in China are built to withstand a certain water capacity, but heavy rains and floods have caused water levels to rise beyond the dams specified capacity then of course the dam will collapse if it goes beyond its expected capacity. And do you have evidence that the Communist Party corrupt contractors to save money by building weak dams? You said: "This would not happen in my country, because government inspectors check the work of contractors." How many dams does your country have, you tell me? China is home to nearly 22,000 dams that are over 15 metres (49 ft) in height, that's about half the world's total that having been constructed in China since the 1950s. Does your country have more than half the world's number of dams to inspect? You said: "If a contractor tried to cut costs by building a sub-standard dam, they would be arrested and thrown in jail for endangering public safety. China apparently doesn't have inspectors." China is literally home to half of all the world's dams and you're claiming China doesn't have inspectors? Seriously? China is home to the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam and you're claiming China doesn't have inspectors? Video: National Geographic: The Largest Dam in the World https://youtu.be/j3J196bLP5E You said: "China has seen some of the worst plagues of disease, earthquakes, storms, and even swarms of locusts destroy hundreds of millions of livestock and destroy millions of acres of farmland. So China is not doing very well with food right now." China is literally the world's largest agricultural producer, producing more rice, wheat, cotton, lettuce, onion, cabbage, green bean, green pea, cauliflowers, eggplant, potato, spinach, carrots, turnips, pumpkins, sweet potato, pear, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruit, tomato, watermelons, chestnuts, peanuts, walnuts, than any other country in the world. List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities https://wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_producing_countries_of_agricultural_commodities If there is famine in China, then countries that depend on Chinese agricultural imports will be the first one affected as China halts the export of produce. You said: "It is estimated that Mao killed between hundreds of thousands to 20 million Chinese. Compared to that, Chiang kai-shek was an amateur." Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine that was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he'll wish for fair weather and bountiful harvests because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. You said: "You say that Taiwan is suffering under democracy. According the the most recent reports, Taiwan has the 8th largest economy in Asia and the 18th in the world." Because Taiwan's economic boom was built under authoritarian single-party rule by Chiang kai-shek and the KMT, it is under democracy that Taiwan's economy has since fallen. Taiwan used to be one of Four Asian Tigers but since democracy was introduced to Taiwan, it's economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving for jobs in the mainland or Singapore Video: How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents | Insight | CNA Insider youtu.be/P3BCnPb8qHY?t=110 "From the '90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreements on policy matters. This produced less effective policy making. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be more conservative in Taiwan, so they do not enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou, Research Fellow, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica You said: "You ask if there is something preventing Taiwan from joining the U.N. The answer is yes. The thing that is preventing Taiwan from rejoining the U.N. is China." So that means Taiwan isn't independent after all since you admit that mainland China is preventing Taiwan from joining the U.N as an independent country. And if you read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. You said: "but when mainland China became a member in 1971, Taiwan lost their seat in the U.N. due to bullying by China." Bullying by China? It was the United Nations countries that democratically voted to recognize the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 as China and to kick the Republic of China 🇹🇼 out of the United Nations in 1971. The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the UN General Assembly Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The poll results were as follows: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting ... Source: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_2758 Since PRC won the vote with two thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, and recognized the People's Republic of China (PRC) as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" from the United Nations. So your countries democratically voted to recognize PRC as China and to kick Taiwan out, how is that "bullying by China"? You said: "Lithuania just opened a Taiwanese embassy." Where's this official Taiwan embassy in Lithuania? Does it have the name Taiwan Embassy on the building indicating that it's an official Taiwan embassy? You said: "Long live Taiwan! Down with China!" So you're just anti-China that's all and you want China to fail is that right?
    2
  11350.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou "Good governence'. Yes, that's the key. Mao understood that best." Under Chairman Mao, China's population nearly doubled in size from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Under Mao, China's life expectancy at birth nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980, and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al. 1984; Coale1984; Jamison 1984; Banister 1987; Ravallion 1997; Banister and Hill 2004). Under Mao, China's infant mortality rate plunged from 195 deaths per thousand births in 1950 to 55 per k in 1980. Under Mao, China's illiteracy rate was nearly halved and by 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%, and it has been described as _"The Single Greatest Educational Effort in Human History".
    2
  11351.  @junebug8485  "神州 Shenzhou I would define good governance as a place where one man's opinions doesn't warrant widespread censorship." Well, that's your own definition then, and your definition clearly differs from mine (which is that good governance means a government is able to deliver what the people want) I mean, comparing two scenarios: (1) The government censors but is able to deliver what the people want (2) The government doesn't censor, but is unable to deliver what the people want, then it's clear that (1) still represents good governance, while (2) doesn't. You can have zero censorship, but if your government is unable to deliver, then in my opinion it's not good governance. You said: "If you need to censor your own people then that's a sign you want more control over them and therefore you aren't for what the people want - but rather your own hold on power. Therefore the current Chinese government does not represent a form of democracy." Holding on to power yes. But again, if your government is able to deliver what the people want, then isn't that an indication of good governance (and therefore a form of democracy)? According to a long-term survey by Harvard University and Ash Center, around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Chinese government. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. You said: "Let me ask you this: If we are truly a bad form of government and the people don't get what they want, how has this same system not collapsed or been through a regime change in over 230 years?" Perhaps in the early stages, for the first 100-200 years, America's government was able to deliver what the people want and most Americans enjoyed a good quality of life probably around 1950s. However, in recent years, the U.S system has become a plutocracy (i.e a government of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%) instead of a democracy, and subsequent U.S administrations are increasingly unable to deliver what the Americans truly want.
    2
  11352.  @bartonlee3594  Even President Xi Jinping has recognized Chairman Mao's contribution to China and mentioned it in his 2013 speech (which formed the basis of Xi Jinping Thought). In surveying the history of China, Xi argued it is "Marxism–Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought that guided the Chinese people out of the darkness of that long night and established a New China." And, as to the future, "the consolidation and development of the socialist system will require its own long period of history... it will require the tireless struggle of generations, up to ten generations." ... Source: Wikipedia: Xi Jinping Thought
    2
  11353.  @bartonlee3594  China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt eventually crumbled. China has witnessed the birth and death of many nations, the rise and fall of numerous empires, and yet China has survived the oftentimes violent course of history to modern times relatively intact. China's history has shown that China benefited from a strong centralized government, which China still enjoys today. China's current political system under President Xi and the Communist Party closely emulate the ancient system of rule by the Emperor and Imperial Court. If such a strong central government system proved successful for China for the past millennia, then is there really a need to abandon such a system that works, and adopt Western style democracy? If anything, China is living proof that not all countries have to adopt Western style democracy to be successful.
    2
  11354. Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  11355. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  11356.  @keithborjes312  Trump will eventually have to step down, and then what's next? The USA lacks a long-term strategy against China, because US presidents have to step down after 4-8 years, and are thus, unable to make long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. Whereas Chinese government has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's direction and future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc, and to set specific goals for China to achieve. Here are some of China's goals include (but there may be more than this): -By 2020, China plans to eliminate poverty completely and establish moderately prosperous society. -By 2025, China plans to transform our manufacturing industry to incorporate high-end technology. -By 2030, China plans to be world leader in Artificial Intelligence -By 2035, China plans to be key innovative, scientific power and establish moderately socialist society. -By 2040, China plans to ban all fossil fuel powerplants and all non-electric vehicles for greener future. -By 2045, China plans to be world leading space nation, having established a space elevator. -By 2050, China plans to have surpassed the USA as global superpower, economically and militarily. By abolishing the presidential term limit, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come into fruition in the future. But the US presidents can't make long term plans, because they are limited by their term limits, and the two US parties constantly fight one another, sabotaging each other's plans, instead of fighting for America's future.
    2
  11357. 老实说 翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人对中国有偏见，已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  11358. China strives to attain win-win cooperation. The U.S sees everything as a zero sum game.
    2
  11359.  Chuck O  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    2
  11360.  @johanhirte9661  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up Maps of Yuan Dynasty and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Tibet broke free of China in 1913 but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951, that's why the Seventeen Point Agreement was signed in 1951.
    2
  11361.  @johanhirte9661  Tibet broke free of China in 1913 but wasn't recognised as an independent country (even by the then League of Nations) and it was reincorporated back into China by 1951. Tibet only had 38 years of de facto rule before returning to the mainland, even the United States today recognise Tibet as part of China, so does Germany, India, etc. And about being forced to sign that agreement, according to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid. According to Tibetologist Melvyn Goldstein: Their feeling of duress derives from the general Chinese threat to use military force again in Central Tibet if an agreement was not concluded. However, according to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid - Tibetologist Melvyn Goldstein. Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement#Repudiation_of_the_agreement
    2
  11362.  @johanhirte9661  And what genocide of Tibetans are you talking about? The population of Tibetans in China from 1953 to 2010 actually doubled in size from 3 million to 6 million. That's because Tibetans aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Tibetans in China from 1953 to 2010 1953 : 3,640,125 1964: 2,501,174 1982: 3,821,950 1990: 4,593,072 2000: 5,416,021 2010: 6,282,187 ... Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    2
  11363.  @johanhirte9661  Today, Tibet is recognised as part of China, even the United States recognise Tibet as part of China, and so on does Germany for crying out loud. Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    2
  11364.  @johanhirte9661  The drop in Tibetan population in 1953 - 1964 was due to the 1959 Tibetan Uprising, because the 14th Dalai Lama was a tool of the CIA. The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government (Beijing) and that led to the 1959 Tibetan Uprising. We know this today because declassified CIA files have exposed that a total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) …… Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Costs So here we have concrete evidence that the 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the USA to engage in separatist activities against the Central People's Government.
    2
  11365.  @johanhirte9661  "神州 Shenzhou Well u think he was a separatist." The 14th Dalai Lama was a CIA tool, and those declassified CIA documents revealed that he received funding from the CIA to conduct separatist activities. The Americans did not care about Tibetan independence, they only wanted to undermine communist countries. In his 1991 autobiography Freedom in Exile, the 14th Dalai Lama criticized the CIA for supporting the Tibetan independence movement "not because they (the CIA) cared about Tibetan independence, but as part of their worldwide efforts to destabilize all communist governments". In 1999, the Dalai Lama claimed that the CIA Tibetan program had been harmful to Tibet because it primarily served American interests, claiming "once the American policy toward China changed, they stopped their help".
    2
  11366.  @yueyue1973  If you want to talk about sports then take the Olympics for example and China bags plenty of gold medals at the Olympics.
    2
  11367. The company that ordered the tanker to transfer oil to North Korean vessels was actually Taiwan-based charterer, Billions Bunker Group Corp so you can't blame mainland China for actions of Taiwan company
    2
  11368. During peace talks in Istanbul, Putin even withdrew Russian forces outside of Kiev as a gesture of goodwill in order to create favorable conditions for peace talks.
    2
  11369. That's the difference between looking for partners (China) and looking for puppets (USA).
    2
  11370. +General S. Patton U.S does not violate the rights of its own citizens on same footing as CCP? Snowden exposed that USA was tapping into communication lines and monitoring people's private conversations, so how is that much different from our system? Falun Gong practitioners are practicing ancient Chinese culture? Qigong widely practiced throughout China outside of Falun Gong. Falun Gong was only founded in 1992 by Li Hongzhi (less than 30 years ago) whereas Qigong has thousands of years of history, so isn't it obvious Falun Gong hijack Qigong practices to use in their new religion, which has been classified by some people as a cult. The leader, Li Hongzhi is very charismatic and influence his followers to believe he is immortal and can cure cancer. Some of his followers with early stage cancer, which is potentially treatable, have been encouraged to donate their savings to his cause, instead of seek medical treatment with doctors. RYB Education Institution is run by US-listed group and is a private company (not owned by the government) so how is it the government's fault and why you attribute its actions to that of the CPC? You are attributing the blame onto the wrong people, since the company is not government-run. Source rt.com/news/410862-us-run-nursery-china-abuse/ "Nail houses" are result of people who refuse to give up their property even when they have been offered 5 times the market rate for their houses. All they are doing is slowing progress of China, since roads have to be built around these places because they want more money for their houses. If you claim government is abusing citizen rights, then why not the government simply bulldoze these houses instead of listening to their requests? China's nail houses theguardian.com/cities/gallery/2014/apr/15/china-nail-houses-in-pictures-property-development
    2
  11371. China is developing medical exoskeletons to help paraplegics regain the use of their legs. Video: China-made exoskeleton robot gives hope to paraplegics youtu.be/3_o8nthlIIA
    2
  11372.  Soul Traveller  Thanks for the update on Top Smartphone Brands in India. It's changing all the time, but the constant remain is Indians love Chinese smartphone brands.
    2
  11373.  @DheerajKumar-bh2tv  Xiaomi was started in 2010. Today it's one of the world's most popular smartphones. In India, it's number one. Video: How Xiaomi broke out of China to go global | CNBC Reports youtu.be/291DlKa7iIU
    2
  11374. At that time, China was hit by the Great Chinese Famine, which was partially due to poor weather conditions, causing flood and drought, destroying crops and causing famine and starvation. Even Mao Zedong can't possibly control the weather if it doesn't want to be cooperative.
    2
  11375.  @calinyx  Taiwan island inalienable part of China. Even in the 1972 Shanghai Communique, the United States formally acknowledged that "all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China". and that Taiwan is a part of China.
    2
  11376.  @maicholaa7482  A supercomputer in China found that a young vaper in hospital for a “mysterious pneumonia” in the United States last summer could be a victim of coronavirus. thestar.com.my/tech/tech-news/2020/04/09/chinese-supercomputer-and-american-doctors-clash-over-ai-coronavirus-diagnosis-of-young-us-vaper
    2
  11377.  @sophienben-achour5450  Except for chartered flights, no international passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since its lockdown on January 23, People's Daily learned exclusively from the Hubei Airport Group Company. Source: No international commercial passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since lockdown: Airport authority news.cgtn.com/news/2020-07-11/No-international-passenger-flights-departed-from-Wuhan-since-lockdown-S2T0tDumyc/index.html
    2
  11378.  @maicholaa7482  China has launched a rocket carrying its Chang’e-5 robotic spacecraft to the Moon to collect and bring back lunar soil – the first such mission by any country since the 1970s. Video: China launches Chang’e-5 mission to bring back rocks from moon youtu.be/yT3enRxy3o0
    2
  11379. War tactic include aspects, like how China manufacture our own weapons, ammunition, tanks and fighter planes, whereas India relys on purchasing military equipment from foreign countries. During times of war, China can replenish ammunition and make more tanks and jets to replace losses, but India would have to depend on importing them from USA and Russia, and subjected to market price. These countries can always jack up the price, knowing that India has no choice but to buy their weapons.
    2
  11380.  @bartonlee3594  "You create an echo chamber of people who all agree with each other..." Cyrus Janssen has always been consistent in his message that "if the U.S and China cooperate, then the whole world benefits." Then is there something wrong with people agreeing with this positive message?
    2
  11381.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou I agree with that message" See? Even you agree with Cyrus message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" between the US and China, so what echo chamber are you going on about? As for Russia, they've been raising concerns over NATO's eastward expansion right up to Russia's doorstep, so after realising that his words had fallen on deaf ears, Putin finally decided to act.
    2
  11382.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou The Donetsk is part of Ukraine." Exactly, and yet the Ukrainians were shelling their own territory for 8 years. The UN recorded a death toll of 10,000 from the Ukraine civil war in Donetsk and Lughansk. Which is probably why why those two regions decided to break away. As for Crimea, the 2014 Crimean Referendum revealed that an overwhelming majority (97 percent) voted to join the Russian Federation. "The CPC is not gaining any international kudos for its tacit support of Dictator Putin in this war." China has put forth a 12-point peace process to bring an end to the conflict in Ukraine, of which Putin has agreed with, and President Xi has even made a phonecall to Zelenskyy. Resolving a conflict requires speaking to both sides, and China is the best bet to a peaceful resolution in Ukraine. Or are you saying that the world doesn't want peace in Ukraine?
    2
  11383.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou I'm not demanding. I'm just asking." Where's the question mark (?) in your statement, if you claim to be asking, not demanding? I've answered your earlier questions about disagreeing with Chinese nationalists that want outright war (like Admiral Luo) but in return, you've just kept on calling me a typical nationalist, because it's apparent that your perception of me is not going to change regardless of my answer. Then why should I answer to your demands?
    2
  11384.  @bartonlee3594  About you constantly harping on me being a nationalist, I am Chinese after all and China is my motherland. Who's going to care about China's interests, if not Chinese? Who wants the most to see China succeed if not Chinese? Who else can defend China if not Chinese? You don't care about China, nor our people, nor can you stand to see China succeed that's all. Yet when I defend China, you call me nationalist?
    2
  11385. That Chinese grandma was probably snickering at granddad during the Chinese tea ceremony. Or at her age she could be secretly hiding a cough or a sneeze, but laowhy just want to paint Chinese in negative light that's all.
    2
  11386. I agree. Why not ask South Koreans and Japanese people too, if they like Hip Hop culture? So far nobody seems to like hip hop or hold it in high regard.
    2
  11387.  @GMK189-f2k  If Taiwan was truly independent, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations as an independent country? Is there some force preventing Taiwan from joining the UN like an independent country can?
    2
  11388. -When China was strong, Japan much copied Chinese culture and language, including Chinese characters. -When Portugese Jesuits visited Japan, Japan obtained guns from them, as well as Portuguese words like Pan (Bread), Kappa (Raincoat), Tempura (Fried food), etc. -Now America is strong, so Japan copied English words like Kohi (Coffee), Aisu Kurime (Ice Cream),Sofuto Kurimu (Soft Cream) Anime, Baiku (Bike), Biru (Beer), Buruma (Bloomers), Doraibā (Driver), Konpyuta (Computer), Pinchi (Pinch), Faito (Fight), Keki (Cake), Imeji (Image), Konbini (Convenience Store), Terebi (Television), Tabako (Tobacco), etc.
    2
  11389.  @tuppenceworth5485  Singapore is the only South East Asian country to have slapped sanctions on Russia. No other SEA country (i.e Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, Philippines, etc) have done so. Singapore's move earned it a place on Russia's list of "unfriendly countries".
    2
  11390.  @robertglover-e6y  Migration of Chinese to the U.S is because American immigration laws are loose. An immigrant with a family member or relative who's a U.S citizen, is themselves eligible to apply for citizenship. Whereas in China, immigration laws are much stricter.
    2
  11391.  @skizmo1905  You said: "The westerners see it for what it really is... without the lies of the CCP." Have those Westerners actually lived through what Chinese people in China have experienced in the past few decades? Previously, China was a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving nation in the past, but fast forward till today, and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (or the largest if you go by GDP PPP), the factory of the world (i.e Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the communist party of China, despite what the West has been saying about China all this while.
    2
  11392.  @Mohawkwarrior999  So you're admitting that NATO in this conflict? But by all accounts, Ukraine is not a member of NATO, yet why is NATO involved?
    2
  11393. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  11394. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  11395. Agreed. When the perception of China is good, then it raises the standing of Asians as a whole. But when China is demonized, then the perception towards Asians suffers as well.
    2
  11396. Agreed. Most younger folk tend to be glued to their screens even while out in public. Instead of trying to stop it, why not facilitate integration of cyberspace with real space?
    2
  11397. In Xinjiang, the Uighurs workers drive cotton-harvesting tractors and harvest truckloads of cotton from the fields through machines, yet Western allegations of forced labour in Xinjiang cotton still persist. Video: Xinjiang, China’s top cotton producer youtu.be/ocVn5Cn101M
    2
  11398.  @MarkYeung1  There's proof in Hong Kong that foreign powers were aiding the rioters, helping organise the rioters to manufacture petrol bombs and devising strategies against the Hong Kong police. Some rioters could even be seen waving United States 🇺🇲 flags or United Kingdom 🇬🇧 flags amongst the crowds. As for the 2008 Tibetan Unrest, why would so-called "monks" resort to violence, hurling rocks, overturning police vehicles, breaking into Han businesses, looting and burning down people's houses? And it happened across several areas of Lhasa, Qinghai, Gansu, Sichuan, making authorities suspect it was a coordinated attack.
    2
  11399.  @eatmoreburgers5918  There was clearly a leak: US billionaires pay little to no taxes, leaked documents reveal | DW News youtu.be/6wrGfAFnr1M Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why American monopolies like Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon, dominate their respective industries and eliminated competition from smaller American firms, stifling innovation through competition. China's anti-monopoly crackdown is targeting anti-competitive practices in companies like Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, so that smaller companies can compete with the big through innovation.
    2
  11400.  @eatmoreburgers5918  In China, the Chinese government is cracking down on tax evasion among high-income celebrities. Examples include high-profile actress Zheng Shuang was ordered to pay 299 million yuan ($46 million) in overdue taxes, late fees and fines. In 2018, Fan Bingbing, an A-list star in China, was found guilty of tax evasion and ordered to pay more than 800 million yuan in overdue taxes, late fees and fines. Whereas in the United States, even after it has been exposed that some American billionaires like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffett, Geoge Soros paid little to no taxes, the U.S government doesn't seem interested in going after these American billionaires, they rather investigate the whistleblower who leaked the info.
    2
  11401.  @eatmoreburgers5918  "and either way that's no proof of us corporations using the gov to go after countries." One example is American companie Tesla eyeing Bolivia's lithium mines for itself, so the U.S government overthrew the democratically-election leader of Bolivia, Evo Morales, in order to gain access to Bolivia's lithium mines. Elon Musk even tweeted: "We will coup whoever we want! Deal with it." Video: Elon Musk BACKS Bolivian Coup Against Morales youtu.be/zvqTAs2qrEo
    2
  11402.  @eatmoreburgers5918  You said: "But hillary clinton was not nearly as corrupt as Donald trump made her out to be" Even through your own words, you admit that Clinton was corrupt (just "not nearly as corrupt") but then what actions has been taken to punish Clinton for corruption? I mean, corruption is corruption, are you saying that in the United States, if someone is "not nearly as corrupt" as it was made out to be, that you can be let off the hook? And the fact that most Americans turn a blind eye (most even forgotten about Clinton's corruption) and claiming "turns out it was nothing" is only emboldening the corrupt people in the U.S system. You said: "Corporations do have too much influence in US politics and most American agree with that, but to say they control the gov. is ridiculous." Here's another example of rich U.S corporations controlling the U.S government. Donald Trump is banned from Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc after the 6th Jan Capitol Hill riots, even though Trump was still legally the POTUS at that time. This is testament to the amount of power the rich U.S corporations have over the U.S government, given that they can effectively silence the then President of the United States by banning his account.
    2
  11403.  happy gekko  said "I see that S Korea is superior to China in IT, engineering, military tech, chemical industries etc" China is home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight 神威·太湖之光 and Tianhe-2 天河-2 and in the 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source: China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ How is S. Korea superior to China in IT then?
    2
  11404.  happy gekko  China is home to many of the world's largest Internet companies like Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, Meituan-Dianping, NetEase_ etc, but how many Korean Internet companies are there? Source: List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies
    2
  11405.  @luciferlam6556  Because the USA kept on slapping sanctions on North Korea (just like USA slap sanctions on Iran and Russia too), that's why N. Korea's economy is crippled because of USA's actions. China wants to invest in N. Korea and help develop North Korea's economy, but we can't do anything because of the unreasonable US sanctions on North Korea. Any country is going to suffer if USA choose to slap economic sanctions on them, isn't it? As for South Korea, following the Korean War, South Korea remained one of the poorest countries in the world for over a decade and its GDP was was $79 lower than that of some sub-Saharan African countries! South Korea only prospered because Americans kept on funneling money towards S. Korea, and establishing US military bases on Korean soil. Whereas, China establish zero military bases in North Korea. Every country must spend money on defense budget. But South Korea don't have to spend so much money on defense (because of US base presence) whereas N. Korea have to spend money to defend itself (against USA). Furthermore, the USA send money to develop S. Korea, while slapping sanctions N. Korea and preventing China from helping develop N. Korea. And lastly, why is Korean Peninsula even divided in the first place? Why not leave Korea as a single unified country, instead of dividing it into North Korea (USSR) and South Korea (USA)? Wasn't USA partially responsible for the division of Korea today?
    2
  11406. Greek democracy believes that ordinary people should be allowed to choose and elect their leaders. Confucius taught that the relationship between ruler and subject should be virtuous. Rulers are expected to rule benevolently, and in return, the subjects are expected to adhere to the ruler's commands.
    2
  11407.  @markemailonly3114  What sort of mental gymnastics did you had to jump through just to avoid taking responsibility for what you said? That fact that you acknowledge special privileges being granted to ethnic minorities like Uighurs, already refutes your claim that China is treating every Uighur just like other Chinese, since not every Han has access to the same benefits that Uighur have. Some Han do (like in Guizhou) but the vast majority of Han do not enjoy the same privileges as Uighurs, so how is China treating Uighurs the same as Chinese? Also, I never said that "China is certainly doing the opposite of Nazi Germany, its treating every Uyghur just like other Chinese," are in conflict with "Uyhgur's own unique culture and history are not appreciated enough and priority for their preservation be given by the state." nor do they contradict each other, what I'm saying is that your point jumps from here to there, and you're moving the goalpost each time I have your argument cornered. Just like claiming Uighur culture and history are not appreciated enough nor are they being preserved, I've long proven this wrong by showing that Uighur writing is on the Renminbi note, and that China applied for Uighur Muqam of Xinjiang to be recognized as an intangible cultural heritage in UNESCO, I've long refuted these two points. But then you just keep jumping to another point again and again that's all.
    2
  11408.  @markemailonly3114  About the point that Uighurs are treated as Chinese people, again, that's because the Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth, and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (national language of China) and Chinese history . And I used the Hawaiins in Hawaii being American citizens, learning English and American history as another example. The funny thing is that first you said you point is that Uighurs are treated as Chinese people, then now you claimed your point has always been that the Uighur languages was not given primary status and an option not given to them to choose to have Uighur as the primary language. All you are doing is moving the goal post once I've cornered your argument, look at one stage you even said that the Uighur own unique culture and history are not appreciated enough and priority for their preservation be given by the state, but I've already shown how China put Uighur language in the Renminbi note, as well as laboring intensively to apply for Uighur Muqam culture in Xinjiang to be recognized as an intangible cultural heritage under UNESCO. But you just repeatedly changed your point and then claiming that that's been your point all along, after I've shown how China is taking steps to appreciate and preserve Uighur culture. That's why you're using mental gymnastics to jump out of a tight spot each time you are cornered.
    2
  11409.  @Aikúsoul  "神州 Shenzhou China literally lost against Japan in WW2" Everyone knows that Imperial Japan surrendered at the end of WWII, so how did China lost against Japan? Today, China is not under Imperial Japanese control, so clearly the Japanese lost the war against China, what historical revision are you trying to pull off here?
    2
  11410. @Jose Galvao Apparently China suffers no great loss without laowhy, so why should China cater to laowhy then? What? You think dressing up in Chinese clothing and speaking few phrases of Mandarin is enough to impress Chinese to accept you?
    2
  11411.  @angxiang3186  "神州 Shenzhou Your views are already cast ~ u r a simpleton to measure linearly." More insults. You're the one claiming Singapore is never any nation's vassal, yet Singapore is the only South East Asian country to have slapped sanctions on Russia against its own interests. You naively quote Singapore's politicians words that it's about so-called "principles" yet Singapore does not do the same to the U.S what they did with Russia? It just shows Singapore's double standards when it comes to upholding it's "principles". What benefit does Singapore sanctioning Russia even achieve for Singapore? It just puts Singapore on Russia's list of "unfriendly countries" that's all. There was no bad blood earlier between the two countries, but now Singapore's actions is playing right into the U.S hands. Yet you're calling me a simpleton just for pointing this out?
    2
  11412. The unipolar world is dying and in its place, the multipolar world is being born, with Russia and China ushering in its birth.
    2
  11413.  @MarkYeung1  Maybe that attendent in Canada couldn't speak English and thought you should be able to communicate in Mandarin? I mean I cannot speak on behalf of Canada if their attendant refuse to serve you, but what I do know is that there's a saying: "You can take the Chinese out of China, but you can't take the China out of Chinese."
    2
  11414.  @MarkYeung1  Let's make one thing clear, the anti-Asian hate crimes against people of Asian descent in Vancouver were not because of the Communist Party of China. Because none of the Asian victims were communist party members, some weren't even Chinese they were other Asians like possibly Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese, etc. Yet these victims were still attacked because of their race, not because of the Communist Party. So when you said you can love a country without loving the ruling party, this doesn't seem to be the case in Vancouver, where Asian people were attacked even when they aren't communist party members.
    2
  11415. Many Hong Kong people (but not all of them) tend to have the colonial mentality. Colonial mentality is the internalized perception of ethnic or cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization. Such people display an ingrained preference for Anglo-Saxon culture over other "non-white" culture, including their own. Decolonization of Hong Kong will not be complete without decolonization of the Hong Kongers' minds
    2
  11416.  @Tespri  So if historical buildings (Great Wall of China) and Chinese festivals (Chinese New Year) don't count as culture, then what counts as culture? Chinese food perhaps? If that's the case then did you know that there are more Chinese restaurants in the US now then there are McDonald's outlets in the world?
    2
  11417.  @Tespri  Look, you're the one claiming (and I quote your earlier words) "whatever remnants of Chinese culture is destroyed", yet whenever I bring up Chinese historical monuments, Chinese festivals, Chinese food, etc, you just dismiss them as not being part of Chinese culture? Then what exactly is Chinese culture in your eyes? Clearly Chinese culture exists including from historical times, but you're just turning a blind eye to our culture that's all.
    2
  11418.  @Tespri  "I'm talking about technology, infastructure, philosophy, government etc..." Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation under bad weather conditions without Sun/Stars easier. And Gunpowder has revolutionized warfare. China has infrastructure that the West doesn't even have. China is home to the world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. China has many philosophers from various schools of thoughts, from Confucius (孔子) and Mencius (孟子) to Laozi (老子) and Mozi (墨子). Many of these philosophy originated in the Spring and Autumn period (春秋) and Warring States period (战国时代), during a period known as the Hundred Schools of Thought (诸子百家). Throughout 5,000 years of history, China has always existed been under a strong central government under the Emperor and the Imperial Court. Even today, China's government still exists under a strong central government under President Xi Jinping and the communist party. There is nothing in the West like China's government.
    2
  11419.  @Tespri  "Shenzhou. and none of those were done by current government but feudal society 500-years ago. Moden khina is nothing" Modern China has transformed from a once poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy (or the world's largest by GDP PPP), the factory of the world (Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China. How is this "nothing"?
    2
  11420. @Kiwi Stover Trumps tariffs are unpopular, even among American companies and farmers, so the next POTUS is likely to reverse Trump's policies. This is not the first time something like this can happen. For example, the previous Obama administration had the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) which had been in the works for 8 years, yet President Trump just cancelled TPP and withdrew USA, simply because he don't like Obama (Obama humiliated him with his birth cert) So the next US president might just reverse Trump's policies too. Given his policies unpopularity.
    2
  11421.  @mystickyclips35  The "stimulus money" isn't free and doesn't just come out of nowhere. It comes from American tax payer reserves and if it gets depleted throughout course of the trade war then American taxes will rise to maintain the farmers money.
    2
  11422.  @mystickyclips35  Chinese workers make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys clothing, sneakers, cheap so that inflation in America kept to minimum and cost of living in America is lower than it should be. Think of the billions of dollars Americans saved on living expenses over the years thanks to Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursuits like cars, luxury brands, housing, etc. By cutting off Chinese trade from your economy, Americans will suffer higher living expenses, especially if they have to pay more taxes to support American farmers with "stimulus money"
    2
  11423.  @mystickyclips35  You mock Chinese goods, then consider this question: Are American workers themselves willing to work for the same low pay as Chinese workers? If not, then prices of American goods will be higher as compared to Chinese goods and Americans will face higher cost of living as well as needing to pay tax to support farmers with stimulus money.
    2
  11424. Alright then, guess I sort of misread your statement there.
    2
  11425. coptic777 So where's your source for world's earliest gear and cog then? You still haven't answered my question, despite dismissing my Wikipedia source.
    2
  11426. It is clear that sanctions do not work on North Korea. Why continue to pursue sanctions if it doesn't have any effect? North Korea is targeting US military bases in South Korea and Japan, and Chinese government can't do anything about it. The steps needed to reduce tensions lies in the withdrawal of US forces from the above countries, which means that USA is the answer here. No amount of Chinese sanctions on North Korea is going to have any appreciable effect here.
    2
  11427.  @martinusv7433  About humanitarian efforts in China, according to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 6.5% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China And its all been achieved under the CCP leadership.
    2
  11428. ​ @martinusv7433  "Let us talk about art, classical music, literature in contemporary China" Chinese art has arguably the oldest continuous tradition in the world, marked by an unusual degree of continuity within. The National Art Museum in Beijing, China, ranks among the world's most visited art museum right up there with the world famous Louvre in Paris, France, receiving almost numbers of annual visitors. Source: List of most visited art museums wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_visited_art_museums Tradition Chinese landscape painting (shānshuǐ 山水 "Mountains and Water") captures the beautiful Chinese landscape, the towering mountains, the jagged cliffs, the sparse trees, cascading waterfalls, shrouded in mists. It's difficult to properly describe the beauty inherent within artistic works and the amount of effort that goes into producing such works of art. This videos is an example of Chinese mountain painting being brought to life by talented Chinese artist. Video: Landscape Traditional Painting in Chinese Art youtube.com/watch?v=NdT_Z1WXCC8
    2
  11429. @daniel Architeldo If Taiwan was the "real China" then why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lost the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳? During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage compared to the Kuomintang. The KMT had massive wealth (taxed from peasants), superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists' right to rule China.
    2
  11430.  @MarkYeung1  What's wrong with buying Chinese apartments? Today China is a country of homeowners with more than 90% of households owning homes (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations (Huang et al., 2020). ... (Source: National Library of Medicine) ... This achievement is in sharp contrast to the recent decline of homeownership rate in the U.S., Western Europe and other developed countries. According to the source, the rate of homeownership in the U.S. has dropped to the lowest point since 1965 at 63% in 2017 (US Census Bureau, 2018).
    2
  11431.  @billyehh  Yet it is Chinese citizens that receive the most flak for buying American farmland, when the statistics show its the Canadian citizens that own the most.
    2
  11432.  @MarkYeung1  "Our government doesn't want foreign buyers to buy houses excessively and drive up prices so that people cannot afford housing." Yet your government sees nothing wrong with Canadian citizens buying up huge swaths of American farmland? I though you were all about not discriminating against foreign ownership here?
    2
  11433.  @MarkYeung1  "Ask the buyers of Evergrande and Country Gardens apartments," It doesn't change the fact that China's home ownership rate is 90% whereas the U.S home ownership rate is only 63%. A greater percentage of Chinese own homes than Americans yet you're basing Chinese housing market on just two companies?
    2
  11434.  @sladewilson377  It's no secret that the U.S is in decline and China is rising. Many economists predict that China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's someday in the foreseeable future. The Russian ruble is ranked the best performing currency and China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, in African countries. The transition from a uni-polar world to a multi-polar world may be slow, but it's happening alright.
    2
  11435. Why don't the Indians settle their border dispute with Nepal instead of starting another with China? Video: 1 Indian killed, 4 injured after Nepal police fired near border area with Bihar youtu.be/SFW4-ViJ0_o
    2
  11436. +Yumeha Minakami Chinese crossbow invented in 6th century BC, long before the Gastraphetes, so won't the Greeks had time to copy Chinese inventions then? According to Wikipedia: Gastraphete, "There are no attestations through pictures or archaeological finds of the Gastraphetes" so how can you truly proved it exists? How can you prove it is independently occurring phenomena then? Crossbows weren't used throughout much of ancient history, prior to Chinese crossbow. so couldn't these people have learnt of the crossbow through trade with China? I have never claimed written characters are Middle Eastern invention. All I am talking about is crossbows, and you are the one unnecessarily bringing up bows and written language to detract from this conversation. Excuse me but did you actually watch the whole video you posted? Skallagrim also tested RIVETED mail around halfway through the video, specifically a reproduction of viking mail armor based on Gjermundbu find with RIVETED rings. Even the video's title is "Old vs. New - Bows and Crossbows tested on Butted and Riveted Mail Armor ("Chainmail")" so again, why am I wrong in claiming that a high powered arrow or crossbow bolt CAN penetrate mail armor, including RIVETED mail. Aside from blast furnace, so who invented the "Cupola Furnace" then? Who invented "Cast Iron"? What about the "Puddling" process to produce "Wrought Iron"? You claim everything else I said is wrong, then why don't you prove it, instead of just dismissing my research just like that? I never said Chinese invented iron, because iron comes in various grades, so a poor quality iron weapon would be susceptible to high grade bronze weapon. Do you actually know these things about metallurgy? I don't understand you here, you want to talk about "technological inventions," not seafaring capabilities so why are you introducing sea voyages into this discussion? Chinese people could simply be feeling the need not to explore and remained close to the coast that's all. If you claim Indian ships are most sophisticated, then why not produce evidence, instead of just claiming so? I have shown evidence of much of Chinese naval inventions, but you just keep ignoring what I said and dismissing my research. About Chinese history, I never said the other ships don't exist, all I am saying is that Red Cliff Naval Battle was merely a candidate for being one of the largest naval battles in history. Does that mean I deny other candidates or other naval battles? Why are you purposely misreading my statements? Every country have their own warship, and Chinese ships were in the form of "castle ships" during that time, so what am I saying wrong? Also piracy in Asia only emerged (or became significant) after 9th century AD, so why are you factoring piracy into this issue, set in Han dynasyt 200 BC to 200 AD? Aren't we limiting the time period to around the Three Kingdoms period, or are you suddenly including all of China's long history here? During Han dynasty, there weren't any records of piracy. Paper is still more popular than Papyrus. Why aren't we still using papyrus today then, if you look down on paper? Its cheaper, its easier to make and has several other advantages over papyrus. As for paper money being more convenient than gold and silver, how is this statement wrong? China didn't have enough gold and silver to circulate throughout the country, so of course it made it more convenient to use paper money instead of gold. Imagine today, modern countries would also have insufficient gold and silver to circulate among its citizenry, so why is China wrong for foreseeing the problems of the modern age, back when paper money was first invented? I have shown I am not wrong, when I said paper money is more convenient. Imagine today, if your country is short of gold and silver, because it is being circulated as currency today. Counterfeiting currency existed before paper money was made. No matter what material currency is made off, it can always be faked. I have been clear and precise in my statements, I make arguments to the best of my knowledge and support them with facts, dates and logic, whereas you appear to just dismiss my arguments without consideration. Mail armor is not the BEST armor in the world, and its usage declines approximately at the time of rise of high powered arrows and crossbows.
    2
  11437.  @Shadowless_Kick  Do you have evidence that Hu Jintao did not return and vote, and that the TV mixed earlier videos with later events?
    2
  11438.  @Shadowless_Kick  "I could not find any video showing his activity after the incident. " Footage of Hu Jintao's return is available online.
    2
  11439.  @jasonleetaiwan  "The PRC would have to be an open democracy before you could compare the differences between them." Why does whether a country is democratic or not a factor? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    2
  11440.  @jasonleetaiwan  "A guy posted picture of a get together with too many people and said something like he was breaking the law." What's the name of that guy and was he really breaking the law? We are still currently in the midst of a pandemic and there could be limits on group sizes in Beijing that the man was disobeying.
    2
  11441. @Christopher Jacobs China's political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot). Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western MSM constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    2
  11442.  @jasonleetaiwan  But China's political system has transformed our once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    2
  11443.  @jasonleetaiwan  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: Wikipedia: White Terror (Taiwan) But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Source: Wikipedia: Taiwan Miracle Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    2
  11444.  @jasonleetaiwan  "神州 Shenzhou the point is that if you implemented the ROC system on mainland China, you would see it reach its full potential."_ What makes you assume that China would be a better under the ROC system? The Republic of China 🇹🇼 lost the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan. During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage; they were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were lousy, and they had far fewer numbers (only 50 communist members in 1921) over the Kuomintang. The KMT on the other hand, had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training, and far superior numbers over the the communists. Securing victory against the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT. Yet the communists survived all KMT attempts to wipe them out, employing strategies like "Long March" (长征) and despite KMT's initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communist's right to rule China.
    2
  11445.  @bostonbruinsfanboy  The Communist Party of China transformed China from a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country into the world's 2nd largest economy, whereas the KMT only did so with Taiwan (and through authoritarian means too). Yet why is it people keep on advocating for mainland China to abandon our system (which works) for a Western style democracy that doesn't work in Taiwan island? As for GDP per capita, China has to host the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion, so if you divide our GDP by our enormous population, then of course you'll arrive at a lower GDP per capita for mainland China than for Taiwan. But like you said, cost of living is rising in Taiwan, and the stagnant wages aren't helping them. Also, why mention Jason? Is it because you're unable to debate me that you tell me to debate him instead?
    2
  11446.  @jasonleetaiwan  Under Chairman Mao, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Under Mao, China's life expectancy at birth nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al.). Infant mortality rates were halved under Mao and so was adult illiteracy rate. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43% under Mao.
    2
  11447.  @jasonleetaiwan  You said: "but some how you think Chiang started it just because the CCP had smaller numbers. I never said that, I clearly stated that Chiang started dividing China by deliberately purging communists during the 1927 Shanghai Massacre. You're the one saying CPC was planning to overthrow the KMT government by force, but the communist strength was just 50 members in 1921, so how to overthrow by force? You said: "It's their intention and not their numbers. They were not a benevolent group of people." The Communists promised to take power from the corrupt landlords and redistributed it back to the peasantry (whom at that time, made up the majority of China's population) whereas it's the KMT that protected the corrupt landlords and continued taxing the peasants again and again. And there's also the case where the U.S sent some $750 million in aid to the KMT, but the KMT just pocket the money for themselves, until U.S President Truman made a remark about it. You said: "They were starting uprisings in Shanghai with the aim of taking military control of China." That was AFTER the April 12 1927 Shanghai Massacre where Chiang purged 5,000 - 10,000 communists, effectively declaring war on the communists. You think the communists are just going to suffer thousands of deaths of their comrades by Chiang and not do anything about it? It's clearly Chiang that started the Chinese Civil War, yet you refuse to accept this fact, and somehow insisted Mao divided and weakened China before and after WWII.
    2
  11448.  @jasonleetaiwan  You said: "The KMT troops switched sides because their generals made deals with the CCP after losing their positions in the Legislative Yuan thus removing them from power." So why'd those KMT generals lose their positions in the Legislative Yuan? And the communists actually accepted the KMT generals that switched sides, whereas Chiang was purging communists left and right, so who is the one truly responsible for dividing up China and starting the Chinese Civil War if not Chiang? You said: "The CCP's legacy is undermining the democracy China had by making deals with these people." Whoever said that the KMT stood for "democracy"? The KMT literally fired their generals (who spoke up against them) and it was the communists who accepted them into their ranks, so who is democratic here? If the KMT truly stood for democracy, then why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 if they had the support of the people?
    2
  11449.  @jasonleetaiwan  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Of course he divided China by having an army in the first place that was fighting with the central government." Once again, because Chiang kai-shek started purging thousands of communists during the Shanghai Massacre, that's when the KMT declared war on the communists and you expect the communists to just lie down and die? In fact, it should have been a piece of cake for the KMT to wipe out the communists, yet through sheer grit and determination, the communists survived all KMT attempts to wipe them out, employing tactics such as the Long March 长征 to break free of KMT encirclement and regroup. This tactical retreat had seen communist forces reduced from 69,000 (October 1934) to just 7,000 (October 1935), while the KMT had a strength of over 300,000. You said: "And Mao was a traitor to China because he discouraged his generals from fighting the Japanese like Zhu De." So was Chiang a traitor to his people, because even after the Japanese invaded Manchuria in 1931, he continued purging communists (our fellow Chinese ) instead of meeting the invaders head-on? That it took a kidnapping and negotiations by CPC diplomats to finally get Chiang to ally with the communists against the Japanese invaders? You said: "The CCP also gave intelligence to the Japanese where the Nationalists troops were." Do you have actual concrete evidence that the CPC really did this? You said: "If they had lost, this all would have been exposed but instead you think they are heroes for sneaking up from behind later after Chiang did the real work defending China." Once again, Chiang refused to meet the Japanese invaders head on when they invaded Manchuria in 1931, and it took the communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu to negotiate for Chiang's release (even after what he did to the communists) to finally form an alliance between the KMT and the communists against the Japanese invaders. Also, we've already established that even after the Japanese surrendered at the end of WWII, the communists had a strength of 1,200,000 (July 1945) whereas the KMT had a strength of 2,000,000 (June 1946). So the KMT still outnumbered the communists even after WWII, and yet they still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants?
    2
  11450. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou HOW ABOUT HUMANS? ARE THEY ANIMALS TO YOU?" No, why would I even suggest that? Your questions just come out of the blue and the topic has nothing even to do with humans and animals, yet why are you suddenly bring this up?
    2
  11451. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou RE-READ THE FOLLOWING PASSAGE:" Again, that doesn't explain away the members of the Church having scandals. Even recently, the Pope himself has to apologize for the evil committed at Canada's indigenous population.
    2
  11452. @comment sense You said: "IF YOU CAN TREAT DOGS LIKE THAT, THEN WHY CAN'T GOD TREAT YOU LIKE THAT?" If Westerners can treat lobsters like that, then who are you to impose your own beliefs onto me? Everything is relative and nobody is perfect, then who are you to judge me based on your own perception of what's acceptable and what's not?
    2
  11453. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou DOES CAPITAL LETTERS BOTHER YOU?" No, I just stated that it's a sign of weakness and insecurity that's all.
    2
  11454. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou GO READ YOUR CHINESE HISTORY BOOKS." China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    2
  11455.  @michaelmoore1637  If you want to talk about countries not living under the rule of law, just look at the United States drone strike in Afghanistan, killing Afghan civilians (including women and children) and the U.S court ruled that the U.S General responsible for ordering the attack "did not do anything wrong."
    2
  11456.  @michaelmoore1637  The USA is literally bombing and killing Muslims through wars in the Middle East, yet you want to complain about what happened in China over 30 years ago? A more recent incident would be the Americans who arrived in Capitol Hill on Jan 6, 2021 with real political grievances that they believe weren't addressed, so why don't you talk about that instead of events over 30 years ago? And the U.S General who ordered the drone strike in Kabul, killing Afghan civilians (including women and children) has been found to have done nothing wrong by U.S court, so is that really rule of law?
    2
  11457.  @kalitech2026  Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions?
    2
  11458.  @kalitech2026  The Chinese government is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending after the USA: Countries by Research and Development spending 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($275.0 billion) 3. Japan ($165.7 billion) 4. Germany ($118.8 billion) 5. South Korea ($91.6 billion) 6. India ($66.5 billion) 7. Brazil ($38.0 billion) 8. United Kingdom ($44.8 billion) 9. Russia ($42.6 billion) 10 France ($38.4 billion) ... Source: List of countries by research and development spending wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending#List In the West, researchers often have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    2
  11459.  @zhanganxin  Tik Tok is by Chinese company Bytedance. So those Tik Tok users are bashing China while using a Chinese media platform.
    2
  11460. Think of it as a boxing match between the U.S and China, except that the U.S is busy punching himself, while China is busy doing push-ups to get stronger.
    2
  11461. Many of Brian's new subscribers follow him for his debunking of Western propaganda towards Russia, but are surprised when they learn of his debunking of the same propaganda towards China. Whereas long-term subscribers to Brian's channel already know this.
    2
  11462.  @kaixiang5390  About China's immigration policy, China is the country with the world's largest population at 1.4 billion people, so competition for schools, jobs, resources is very intense and China doesn't really need more immigrants. What China does is to only accept the bare minimum number of immigrants and no more than absolutely necessary. Residence priority is given to those with something outstanding to contribute to China, such as doctors, lawyers, engineers, scientists, researchers, etc. and lower priority is given to immigrants who are refugees, drunks, deadbeats, dissidents, drug addicts, traffickers, sex tourists (sexpats), and other such immigrants. Other countries are welcome to pick up these immigrants, but China's policy is not to accept them.
    2
  11463.  @kaixiang5390  John Cena made a mistake on public broadcast, and he regretted it and made an apology (in Mandarin no less). Because according to Taiwan's constitution , Taiwan is part of China and since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, Taiwan is part of China under their constitution, and Taiwan is not a country (unless said country is China).
    2
  11464.  @swanie360  "神州 Shenzhou China's EEZ (Exclusive Economic Zone) isn't recognised in international law" The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) recognizes a country's EEZ, which extend 200 NM from the baseline. Within this area, the coastal nation has sole exploitation rights over all natural resources. In casual use, the term may include the territorial sea and even the continental shelf. So why you claim China's EEZ in the Paracel Islands isn't recognized? You said: "Otherwise offer historical evidence that these island belong to China, especially the Spratly islands." In the 14th century Song Dynasty work, Zhu fan zhi by Zhao Rugua, the names Qianli Changsha (千里長沙, lit. "Thousand mile-Long Sands") and Wanli Shichuang (萬里石床 lit. "Ten-thousand mile-Rock Bed") refered to Paracel and Spratly respectively. The Yuan dynasty work Daoyi Zhilüe by Wang Dayuan considers that Shitang (石塘) to be the same as Wanli Shitang (萬里石塘, lit. "Ten-thousand mile-Rock Embankment"), which starts from Chaozhou and extends to Borneo, west to Côn Sơn Island off Vietnam and down as far as Java. The History of Yuan uses the terms Qizhouyang (七洲洋, "The Ocean of Seven Islands") and Wanli Shitang, which are taken to mean Paracel and Spratly respectively. In the Mao Kun map from the Zheng He's voyage of the early 15th century, groups of islands were named as Shitang (石塘), Wansheng Shitangyu (萬生石塘嶼), and Shixing Shitang (石星石塘), with Shitang to mean Paracel. Another Ming text, Haiyu (On the Sea), uses Wanli Shitang to refer to Paracel and Wanli Changsha for Spratly. During the Qing dynasty, a set of maps refer to Paracel as Qizhouyang (Shitang became Spratly, and Changsha became Zhongsha), while a book Hai Lu (Illustrations of the Sea) refers to Paracel as Changsha and Spratly as Shitang. A sea chart prepared in the Daoguang era, Yiban Lu (Particular Illustrations) by Zheng Guangzu, uses Xisha to refer to Paracel. Xisha became the standard name used in China in the 20th century, and was used in 20th century maps published by the Republic of China, for example in 1935, and the 1947 11-dash line map which claimed Paracel and Spratly as its territories. You said: "Using your logic anything the Indian ocean belongs to India? I don't think so." All I'm saying is that majority of the Paracel Islands fall within 200 NM of China's geographic baseline, so it's within China's EEZ then why are you misinterpreting it to become Indian Ocean belonging to India? How is that my logic?
    2
  11465.  @NoChinaforever17  Imperial Japan committed numerous wartime atrocities like Nanjing Massacre, Unit 731, and comfort women issue. During the Nanjing Massacre, Japanese soldiers butchered Chinese men for sport, and held contest to see who could rack up the most kills. Chinese women were gangaped and killed, their bodies mutilated, their you-know-what bayoneted or having sharp sticks of bamboo shoved in. The young and elderly weren't spared, and Japanese soldiers cut open babies to do them. Japanese forced families to perform acts of incense; Sons were forced to do their mothers and fathers to daughters. Pregnant women were gangaped and had their swollen bellies stabbed, the unborn fetus torn from their wombs and bayoneted right before their eyes. Source: Nanjing Massacre wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanjing_Massacre#Massacre What did Chinese people do to deserve this? All Chinese people wanted to do was to defend our lands, and protect our homes and loved ones from the Japanese invaders, who stole our lands, plundered our wealth, killed our men and gangaped our women.
    2
  11466.  @NoChinaforever17  China is home to two of top five world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) and Tianhe-2 (天河-2) and in 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Video: Sunway TaihuLight named world's fastest supercomputer youtu.be/KEdsrT1mFAU Source: China surpasses US in supercomputers usage on Top500 list cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion).
    2
  11467.  @NoChinaforever17  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    2
  11468.  @NoChinaforever17  Go ask the Korean Comfort Women what they think about Nanjing Massacre and see whether they like Japan.
    2
  11469.  @NoChinaforever17  Because South Korea has low birth rate and aging population (like Japan) so South Korea desperately needs migrant workers to support your aging population. Source: South Korea Needs More Immigrants koreaexpose.com/south-korea-employment-permit-system-harms-migrant-workers-and-country/ Because you Koreans aren't willing to work for jobs that Chinese migrant workers are willing to do. You should be thanking migrant workers that Korea is able to function normally.
    2
  11470.  @NoChinaforever17  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    2
  11471.  @NoChinaforever17  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    2
  11472.  @lotuseater7247  Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals for everyone on the planet. Yet we still have starving people, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, because under capitalism, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." The Earth's resources are finite and capitalism seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources, whereas communism is dedicated to distributing resources according to needs.
    2
  11473.  @mayurk8697  Really? So you've been to US prisons, but have you actually been to Chinese prisons?
    2
  11474.  @mayurk8697  "That damn nation is on the verge of revolution" It appears that you've confused China with USA, especially as elections draw nearer.
    2
  11475.  @hazadus3  Then there are those pre-existing conditions which no matter how healthy and fit you keep yourself, you can still suffer from, like cancer, hypertension, leukaemia, hereditary diseases, and so on. There's also the ultimate disease of all, called old age, which affects everyone eventually. Even you and me will eventually grow old one day. Then there are also healthy young people, who still succumb the coronavirus, and there are also very old patients who miraculously recovered from the brink of death from Covid-19. Why should people's freedom be prioritised over people's lives? Because of the lure of money?
    2
  11476. Frankly speaking though, Trump is one of the few U.S presidents to not start a hot war during his term. In fact, Trump facilitated the U.S withdrawal from Afghanistan, although Trump administration didn't carry it out, it was Biden administration that botched the withdrawal.
    2
  11477.  @normantang7456  Agreed, almost everyone agrees that the U.S needs to get out of Afghanistan, but not on the way it was handled. The U.S's democratic experiment has failed in Afghanistan, after 20 years and pouring trillions of dollars, the democratically elected Afghan government collapsed like a house of cards, the elected Afghan president Ghani fled with cars full of American cash, and the 300,000 strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban without a fight. If anything, this shows that imposing Western-style democracy onto an unwilling country doesn't necessarily mean the country will be successful as a Western democracy.
    2
  11478.  @MarkYeung1  China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: Wikipedia: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities
    2
  11479. 한국어로변역하는인간 I was elaborating on R wi's post on talking about human rights to the Arabic countries.
    2
  11480.  @DeySouravOfficial.  Yes, China actually helped Vietnam gain independence from France. During the 1st Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons (ranging from artillery guns to rifles and machine-guns), ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help Vietnam fight the French for independence. Video: First Indochina War wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Indochina_War#China From 1950 to 1954, the Chinese government shipped goods, materials, and medicine worth $43 billion (in 2019 dollars) to Vietnam. From 1950 to 1956, the Chinese government had also shipped 155,000 small arms, 58 million rounds of ammunition, 4,630 artillery pieces, 1,080,000 artillery shells, 840,000 hand grenades, 1,400,000 uniforms, 1,200 vehicles, 14,000 tons of food, and 26,000 tons of fuel to Vietnam.
    2
  11481.  @lissendegn950  About chips, Chinese scientists have developed a new type of brain-inspired chip, creating a riderless autonomous bicycle that can detect and track targets, avoid obstacles, and is self-balancing. Video: Chinese scientists develop new type of brain-inspired chip youtu.be/my7CXcYw-ss The chip was developed by a research team in China's Tsinghua University
    2
  11482. But one of the benefits is that the cost of living in America is kept lower than it would have been. Think about the amount of money Americans have saved over the years thanks to access to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent elsewhere such as rent, schooling, healthcare and so on. As for fostering dependence on other countries which gave them leverage over US policies, I've never heard of any other country influencing US's foreign policies. ... (Except Israel.)
    2
  11483.  @vanpho7741  You said: "Before 1975, those islands belonged to Vietnam. Stop lying." Do you have evidence of your claims? Phạm Văn Đồng served as president of Vietnam, how is he a traitor like you claimed? Vietnam PM recognized the Spratly and Paracels as historically Chinese, now you want to go back on your own words?
    2
  11484.  Narglar Wing  Hyper ethnonationalism? Many Chinese people warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors (just ask the expats here). But however, many Westerners are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands with suspicion? Yes, the West learnt lots of technology from China, I've been telling others. But I've met many anti-China people Westerners who refuse to acknowledge it, they constantly insist that China only copies technology that's all.
    2
  11485. Chinese people make cheap product like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, clothing, sneakers, etc, so that inflation in other countries is kept to a minimum and the cost of living is lower than it should be. Think of the millions of dollars people in other countries have saved over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on things like cars, housing, getting married, or paying school fees, college tuition, doctor's fees, etc.
    2
  11486. Chinese products are cheaper because of lower wages, but are Americans themselves willing to work for same low wage as Chinese workers? If not, then the prices of Americans goods are going to be more expensive, due to their higher salaries.
    2
  11487. Russia and China are calling for peace, while the U.S continues to send military equipment to Israel. Who is the true warmonger here?
    2
  11488. In U.S/Western culture, wearing a mask is perceived as being selfish, like you are protecting yourself from infection by other people. In Chinese/Asian culture, wearing a mask is seen as being polite, like you are protecting others from catching your infection. The different cultures affect the perception of wearing masks in both cultures.
    2
  11489.  @Birch37  "神州 Shenzhou no it's not perceived that way at all." Explain then why Asians were attacked simply for wearing a mask in public. Coronavirus Hate Crime: Asian Lady Attacked For Wearing Mask In New York City Subway youtu.be/08QojgjUPiI
    2
  11490.  @Birch37  "Shouldn't China focus on getting its population out of poverty and becoming a first world country? Maybe in 50 years think about being a super power?" Can't China attempt to achieve all three of those goals at the same time? Lifting billions out of poverty and achieving a moderately prosperous society in China would also position China to become a super power someday in the future, especially since it's no secret today that America is in decline, and China is rising. But it's as though you can't stand to see China succeed that's all, which appears to be the reason why you lash out at China.
    2
  11491.  @mrstar1038  Nuclear powered subs are one step towards nuclear armed subs. If Australia don't want to be threatened by nuclear weapons, then why did Australia join AUKUS in the first place? Simply don't acquire nuclear subs if you don't want to be a potential nuclear target.
    2
  11492.  @stunningandbrave2520  Anbang Insurance Group and CEFC China Energy were found to be breaking the law, how does that indicate that the state was behind the downfall of those companies?
    2
  11493. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  11494. +Andrew Ross Under communism, Mao Zedong help to unify China, which the previous Kuomintang administration failed to achieve. Under the KMT adminstration, China was fractured into different provinces and ruled by individual warlords, and even Tibet broke away from China. But thanks to Mao, China was finally unified, instead of divided and fighting amongst ourselves.
    2
  11495.  @Andy-P  As I've mentioned previously (and you agreed) Taiwan economic growth flourished under the authoritarian single-party KMT leadership, then what makes you think Taiwan doesn't want to return to economic growth? Hong Kong is proof that mainland China can tolerate multiple political systems existing within its borders.
    2
  11496.  @Andy-P  Didn't you also see Hong Kong on that list, ranking 6th in the world in number of billionaires? So what makes you think Taiwan will be sacrificing their income if they join China? If anything, it looks as though you're just trying to drive a wedge between Taiwan and mainland China that's all with your statements.
    2
  11497.  @Andy-P  Average person's wealth also doesn't mean that the person is better off. Cost of living also factors into play and mainland China has (generally) a lower cost of living than Taiwan. Food is cheap. Water, gas and electricity is cheap. Transportation is cheap (given that the goal of hi-speed rail is not about making profit). Whereas in Taiwan, not only is the cost of living expensive, but Taiwan's wages are also stagnant.
    2
  11498.  @Andy-P  In Taiwan's latest election, Lai Ching-te only garnered 40% of the votes, yet he became the next President even though he failed to garner at least 50% of the Taiwanese votes.
    2
  11499. december 老实说翻墙后，就觉得不少西方人太无知，在评论里喜欢喷中国但不喜欢讲道理。
    2
  11500. Bob The Buider At least President Xi Jinping is taking steps to curb corruption in the communist party. There are also a number of power limiting measures in place, such as age limit, so that communism officials will eventually step down some day.
    2
  11501.  @antonysmyth2464  East Germany was under the Soviet Union, not Russia. Also, ever since the USSR's dissolution, the border has moved back to Russia, yet NATO has expanded right up to Russia's doorstep.
    2
  11502. 阿三整天喜欢喷中国而已～对自己国内问题没有兴趣。
    2
  11503.  @MarkYeung1  Virtually every state have national security laws (including the United States with the 6th Jan Capitol Hill riots) so that's why Hong Kong now has one as well, to prohibit any act of treason, separatism, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government. And the Hong Kong people literally voted for their own government, in the 2017 Hong Kong Chief Executive election, Carrie Lam won the majority vote with 777 votes out of the 1,200 member Election Committee (which the committee consist entirely of Hong Kong groups) so what makes you think Hong Kong people cannot vote out their government?
    2
  11504. @TRUTH EXPRESS Don't Western chefs boil lobsters alive? If you accept that then who are you to criticise China's culinary culture?
    2
  11505. @TRUTH EXPRESS Pigs have been found to be more intelligent than dogs, yet pork is consumed all over the world isn't it? When animals are regarded as livestock in a certain culture, then who are you to mock their culinary culture?
    2
  11506. @TRUTH EXPRESS Some people choose to keep pigs (and even lobsters) as pets, then who are you to tell others what animals are considered pets or farm animals?
    2
  11507. @TRUTH EXPRESS Rabbits are considered pets in most of the world, yet British have rabbit stew recipes, then are you saying that the British don't know the difference between pets and food?
    2
  11508. @TRUTH EXPRESS You said: "神州 Shenzhou yes, some people eat rabbits," So you agree that some people eat animals that others would consider as pets. And you've also seen nothing wrong with Western chefs boiling lobsters alive, then who are you to complain about China's culinary culture?
    2
  11509. @TRUTH EXPRESS "神州 Shenzhou you can have your own standards compared to whom ever, no problem." Then who are you to judge China's culinary culture? In fact, China's population represents 18% of the world's entire population, while the West (i.e USA, UK, EU, Canada, Australia, NZ all combined) only make up 14% of the world's entire population. So if anything, Chinese people outnumber the people living in Western countries, so who's standard is closer to the "international standard"?
    2
  11510. @TRUTH EXPRESS Taiwan has been ruled by authoritarian single-party KMT for more than half its life. For decades, the KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed or executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived), imposing martial law on Taiwan for 38 years which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world"at that time. But Taiwan flourished under authoritarian KMT rule, resulting in the Taiwan Miracle. Only when democracy was introduced in the 1990s to Taiwan, did economic growth became more modest.
    2
  11511. @TRUTH EXPRESS Dog meat is consumed in South Korea too, so are you going to criticise Korean culinary culture as well?
    2
  11512. ​ @MarkYeung1  According to NBC News, Chinese President Xi Jinping expressed willingness to speak to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, according to the head of the E.U. Where did you get the news that Xi refused to talk to Zelenskyy? Also, NBC news say the West has rejected China's peace plan, then why is the West so opposed to peace in Ukraine?
    2
  11513.  @item6931  You said: ">how is china totalitarian? Xi successfully had the constitution changed to remove term limits," Germany doesn't have term limits for German Chancellor, so are you claiming that Germany is totalitarian as well?
    2
  11514.  @item6931  You said: "Russia still has to sell it so cheap to China that it makes no money for its war machine." According to NYPost, Russian oil and gas revenues, the mainstay of state coffers, rose 22.5 percent in February. Budget income from oil and gas sales reached 521.2 billion rubles ($6.9 billion) in February, compared to 425.5 billion in January. You said: "It will not help China if it does something silly like invade Taiwan: then it will find itself in exactly the same position as Russia." Then EU countries won't be able to buy LNG from China at all, how are they going to survive the upcoming winter? Also, most major countries in the world recognize the One China policy that Taiwan is part of China, so how can a country invade itself?
    2
  11515.  @item6931  Well, NATO hasn't even talked to Russian President Putin at all, then what kind of peacemaker are they as compared to China?
    2
  11516.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Don't forget, Russia started this war." The conflict had been ongoing since the 2014 coup d'etat (by the US) ousting the Ukrainian President Yanukovych and installing their own Washington-friendly candidate into power in Kiev. Putin had made clear Russia's concerns over NATO's eastward expansion right up to Russia's doorstep, but after realizing that for years his words had fallen on deaf ears, Putin decided to act.
    2
  11517.  @bartonlee3594  So you acknowledge that territorial shifts happen all the time, then what business is it of Americans and Europeans if some random city called Kupyansk lies on which side of the border? And what's wrong with being patriotic? A patriot is someone who loves his country and is willing to do things for it. China is much maligned in the West, then what's wrong with me taking up a stance to defend my country? Won't you do the same for your own country?
    2
  11518. China's approach to dealing with Covid is to save lives at the expense of businesses. The United State's approach to dealing with Covid is to save businesses at the expense of lives.
    2
  11519. +Superb Media Content Creator Compare with motorcycles for example. They travel much faster than these mini electric cars and offer zero protection against crashes, yet they are legally allowed on the road? At least this car has some protection, and isn't as fast as a motorcycle on the highway.
    2
  11520. +Aristophanes Why do you want mainland China to collapse? China is world's 2nd largest economy, and if China collapse, the rest of the world will undoubtedly be sent into recession, so it is in other country's interest that China doesn't collapse isn't it?
    2
  11521.  @MarkYeung1  "Under one country two systems, only "patriots" can rule Taiwan. ie people that are loyal to the CCP." Patriots who are loyal to China, and don't think of separating Taiwan from the mainland.
    2
  11522. But when Russia invaded Ukraine and annexed Crimea, America did nothing, except to impose severe sanctions on Russia (which President Trump is reconsidering)
    2
  11523. Mattias Koskela Agreed, so in the same way, USA would be unlikely to participate in actual China-India war today, if such thing were to happen.
    2
  11524.  @chozer1  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    2
  11525.  @user-bp3ou2dq2q  "But the cost would be the destruction of the island," The mainland does not intent to nuke Taiwan (that would be insane and serves no real purpose). A possible scenario is the People's Liberation Army learning a thing or two from the Russian special military operation, and focusing on demilitarizing Taiwan, targeting their airbases and military facilities first. "Tech shock for China" There would be an initial disruption to Taiwan's chipmaking industry. But once Taiwan is fully reunified with the mainland, the mainland would probably gain full access Taiwan's chips once production resumes. In fact, Taiwan exporting of chips to the mainland would probably be better streamlined and simplified after reunification. "economic shock (global sanctions)" Global as in the entire world? Probably the West would slap sanctions on China (as they did for Russia) but as for the developing world (i.e South America, Africa, Middle East, etc) they might still continue doing business with China. We shouldn't think of the West (which only represents 14% of the global population) as the entire world. "political cost" Indeed Chinese wouldn't be comfortable killing our brothers and sisters in Taiwan, but the mainland resolve to see Taiwan reunified with the mainland is strong. Additionally, if reunification is successful, it would show off the capabilities of the People's Liberation Army, and finally the West would get the message that China is not to be trifled with. With so many media claiming that China's Army is untested in combat, the successful reunification with Taiwan would be prove them wrong, and provide a boost to PLA's reputation a miltary force. But in the end, I share your opinion that such an outcome is not preferable for either Taiwan or the mainland. Hopefully the people in Taiwan realized that U.S is merely stoking separatist activity in the island and using the island as a chess piece to contain the mainland's rise.
    2
  11526.  @crusoerob8550  In this day and age, what makes you think Chinese cannot comment here? Have you heard of Liziqi's YouTube channel, which broke the Guinness World Record for "The most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube"?
    2
  11527.  @rr7369  "神州 Shenzhou are you kidding me? "Those who know how to govern..."" The Americans previously elected Donald Trump for president even though he has zero political experience prior to being president. Whereas Chinese President Xi Jinping has around 30-40 years political experience in comparison, that's why many people in China believe that Xi is competent enough to govern a country of 1.4 billion people (certainly no easy feat). That's what I meant by letting those who know how to govern, govern.
    2
  11528.  @rr7369  "神州 Shenzhou Why are you only talking about the US? I know they are bad." Because the USA is influencing European countries, U.K, Canada and Australia to take anti-China stances. It's no secret today that U.S is in decline and China is rising. Many economists believe that China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's sometime in the foreseeable future, but the USA is desperately trying to stop this by rallying it's allies to contain China's rise. "I'm European... we didn't have a war since WW2..." Neither has China since our last conflict in 1979. China's People's Liberation Army (world's largest land army) hasn't had any actual combat experience since 1979, whereas the U.S Army is invading Middle Eastern countries and dragging their allies (Australia, Britain, Canada, EU, etc) into endless conflicts. Even regarding USA shambolic withdrawal of Afghanistan, President Biden didn't even consult U.S allies stationed in Kabul before pulling out. Yet U.S allies seemingly want to follow the U.S into another conflict, this time with China?
    2
  11529.  @rr7369  "神州 Shenzhou Dude... you are still talking about the US! Is all of that just copy&paste?" Look at India, the world's 2nd most populous country after China, and also the world's largest Western-style democracy and why hasn't India surpassed China if their governing system is supposedly superior? Also, do you deny that the U.S influences Australia, Canada, UK, EU countries into taking up anti-China stances that don't serve their interests, only the U.S interests? It's evident that the U.S is the real threat to global peace and stability, dragging their U.S allies into one war after another, and now although the U.S pulled out of Afghanistan, they are planning to start another with China, and influencing their allies to do the same.
    2
  11530. ​ @rr7369  "And of course democracy is better than totalitarianism, because the people are happier and FREE!" You're saying that people in India (world's largest democracy) are happier and free compared to people in China? Let's take for example women's position in India and China. An Indian woman's life expectancy is 71 years, whereas in China it's 79 years, so a Chinese woman lives 8 years longer than an Indian woman. In China, female literacy is 95% , in India it's 65%. The risk of a woman dying in childbirth is 8 times higher in India than in China. Yet you're claiming that because of "democracy" an Indian woman in India is happier and free compared to a Chinese woman in China? You said: "I'd rather be poor and free than rich and controlled by a dictator!" Not everyone is so lucky as to be born in European country like you, without having to worry about food, clothing, having access to education, healthcare, even just basic security. Why don't you go and live in India and taste what true poverty is like before spouting off such statements? Do you even know what's it like to eat dirt to survive? China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, similar to India (world's largest democracy) yet look at how far China has come under the leadership of the Communist Party of China compared to India under their Western-style democracy? "神州 Shenzhou And again US, US, US.... you are obsessed." It's clear that you know the U.S is influencing it's allies like UK, Canada, Australia to adopt an anti-China sentiment in order to contain China's rise. And it's not even in your countries interests, it's in the U.S interest to do so. The U.S abandoned it's allies when they choose to unilaterally withdraw from Afghanistan (without consulting any other world leader) and now USA seeks to start another war with China and dragging it's allies into it.
    2
  11531.  @rr7369  Which other people is as competent as the Communist Party of China in governing our country? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    2
  11532.  @rr7369  Earlier you literally said (and I quote your words) "China has a history of 5000 years and is still lagging behind most other much younger countries!" now you're claiming "China doesn't have 5000 years of history."? You're literally contradicting what you said earlier and stumbling over what you previously said.
    2
  11533.  @rr7369  How about you explain your contradiction when you previously said China has 5000 years of history and now China doesn't have 5000 years of history? If you looked back at China's history, we have always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court. China has historically benefited from having a strong central government, and the current political system under the communist party closely emulates the system of the past, then can't China allow this system to continue? Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period, but fast forward till today and look at how far China has come as the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳. China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having the world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along, then honestly is there really a need to change our government system when it clearly works for China?
    2
  11534.  @rr7369  Now you're just hand waving away your contradiction by claiming you did not include a 😉, but the fact remains that you said China has 5000 years of history, but now contradict yourself by claiming China doesn't have 5000 years of history, then aren't you stumbling over your own words? And China's history is telling us that our country has always been historically governed under a strong central government under the Emperor and the Imperial Court, then can't China continue with such a political system? You said: "China has not benefited from the central government... they were responsible for it being dirt-poor and war-torn!" How? During the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period when China was (technically) a democracy, China was a dirt-poor, war-torn starving country. When back when Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. The KMT tried several times to wipe the communists and they nearly succeeded if not for Mao's strategem, the Long March, in which communist forces travelled incredible distances to evade the KMT and brought the communists back from the brink of extinction at the hands of the KMT. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today. You said: "China having the largest population in the world should make them number 1, not number 2!" India 🇮🇳 has the world's 2nd largest population in the world after China, as well as the world's largest democracy, then why isn't India number 1 or number 2 then? Why hasn't India even overtaken China, you tell me? You said: "Also, looking at GDP per capita, China is ranked 100! That's even worse than countries like Thailand etc!" That's an unfair comparison between China and Thailand. Looking at a GDP per capita basis, since China has the world's largest population, then if you divide our GDP by our enormous population, then of course China's GDP per capita would be low, as compared to Thailand. But if you compare the world's 2 most populous countries, then the GDP per capita of China is 10 times that of the GDP per capita of India (despite China having a larger population than India). You said: ""Made in China" is telling people they get a cheap product, "Made in Germany" is a sign for quality!" Not everyone in the world can afford a Made-in-Germany product, given their hefty price tags. Chinese workers make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, gadgets, clothing, toys, sneakers cheap so that the cost of living in other countries is kept lower than it should be. Think about the billions of dollars people in other countries have saved on living expenses, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other things like cars, luxury brands, housing, rent, tuition fees, etc. I mean, isn't that why many Americans flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money? You said: "Spending money in R&D doesn't automatically result in inventions... many Chinese companies still just copy foreign brands." Let's look at smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Vivo, Realme, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Here's a list of the Top 10 Mobile Phone Brands in World 2021 Ranking List (according MBA Skool) Top 10 Mobile Phone Brands in World 2021 Ranking List Rank 1. Samsung (South Korean) Rank 2. Huawei (Chinese) Rank 3. Apple (American) Rank 4. Xiaomi (Chinese) Rank 5. Oppo (Chinese) Rank 6. Vivo (Chinese) Rank 7. LG (South Korean) Rank 8. ZTE (Chinese) Rank 9. Lenovo (Chinese) Rank 10. Realme (Chinese) ... Source: MBA Skool You said: "And having a big army and spending lots of money on the military is NOT something to be proud of!" Why not? China has learned long ago that a big country with a weak army will only tempt other countries to take invade and take advantage of our country. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us. Now with a strong military, foreign countries like Britain and Japan think twice about invading China and stealing our territories. You said: "So what is your criteria that the government is working? And even if I were to agree, that it does WORK... my point is that it would WORK BETTER without the CCP!" I've already listed my criteria and stood by my arguments. And you claim that it would "WORK BETTER without the CCP!" but where's your proof? China has never been more powerful than we are today under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, then is there really a need for China to abandon a political system that clearly works for our country?
    2
  11535.  @rr7369  "Wrong... China would be a flourishing democracy like Taiwan!" How is Taiwan flourishing? Taiwan used to be one of Four Asian Tigers but since democracy was introduced to Taiwan, it's economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving for jobs in the mainland or Singapore Video: How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents | Insight | CNA Insider youtu.be/P3BCnPb8qHY?t=110 "From the '90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreements on policy matters. This produced less effective policy making. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be more conservative in Taiwan, so they do not enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou, Research Fellow, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica You said: "You mean invaded once more!" Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, back when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territories into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during the Qing Dynasty. Tibet broke free of China in 1912 but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951. I mean, even today, when people refer to the People's Republic of China and draw the map of China, Tibet Autonomous Region is considered part of China. You said: "Democracy alone is not enough, you need good leaders." Well, China has a good leader and President Xi Jinping has shown to be a strong and competent leader, willing to tackle to mountain of corruption inherent within the Communist Party, then what's wrong with China following our own political system? You claimed "China having the largest population in the world should make them number 1, not number 2!" then why hasn't India (world's largest democracy and 2nd most populous country) surpassed China? The problem with liberal democracy for countries with huge populations is that the votes can swing heavily. Look at the 2016 Presidential elections in the USA and already around 80,000 votes swung the election in favor of Donald Trump, then in a huge population democracy like India, the problems are magnified even further. Since China has found a political system that apparently works for our country, then is there really a need for China to abandon our system for Western-style democracy like India? You said: "They are successful BECAUSE they COPY!" How'd you think Japan or South Korea developed and industrialize then, if they didn't copy? I remember previously Japanese companies was copying Western companies, especially in the automotive industry, where their cars tended to be based on European or American models. For example, the 1917 Mitsubishi Model A was based on the Fiat A3-3 design. In the 1930s, Nissan Motors' cars were based on the Austin 7 and Graham-Paige designs, while the Toyota AA model was based on the Chrysler Airflow. _Ohta built cars in the 1930s based on Ford models, while Chiyoda and Sumida, a predecessor of Isuzu, built cars resembling General Motors products 1935 _Pontiac, and 1930s LaSalle. Japanese companies have since come a long way, and likewise, Chinese companies have come through as well. Chinese car companies like FAW Group, Dongfeng, SAIC Motor, Chang'an, Geely, BYD, etc are now producing higher quality vehicles. You said: "Bulls**t! Those countries haven't invaded ANYONE after WW2 and they even wouldn't do so, if China were without any army." Those countries had a history of invasion PRIOR, then why can't China build up an army to defend ourselves in case of the scenario of foreign invasion (as it has often happened in Chinese history) I mean, you have heard of China having 5,000 years of history right? You even previously mentioned (and I quote your words): "There have been many dynasties in "China"s history and their borders have been completely different from what we call China today. They all crumbled and/or where defeated!" then you're supporting China's need for an Army after all. You said: "Just like the US is never going to attack, unlike what many Chinese politicians claim!" Firstly, how can you say for certain the future that the U.S is never going to attack? Do you have powers of precognition, or a magical crystal ball to gaze into the future? Secondly, it is literally thanks to China's military acting as a deterrent to make the USA reconsider any potential invasion of China, then that's why a large country like China needs a big army. You said: "Where is your proof that I couldn't do a better job than the CCP?" Did I ever said you couldn't do a better job? Why are you asking me this question then? You're the one claiming that your point is that it would "WORK BETTER without the CCP!" then I'm asking you for prove to backup your claim. But you answered my question with a question of your own?
    2
  11536.  @rr7369  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China. Taiwan was actually better off under authoritarian single-party KMT rule than they are today under democracy. ... The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet.
    2
  11537.  @rr7369  "神州 Shenzhou so you think all of the world should be ruled by authoritarian single-party governments?" Did I ever indicated such? I'm saying that Taiwan's great economic success was built upon authoritarian single-party rule, under the KMT leadership and Chiang kai-shek's dictatorship, not because of Western-style democracy. So since that's the case, then why can't China continue our political system under the Communist Party of China when it has proven to be successful thus far? I mean, look at India (world's largest democracy and the world's 2nd most populous country) and they are nowhere near the level of China's development, then this goes to show that not all countries have to adopt Western-style democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. You said: "Like North Korea etc? Don't hear you bragging about how great they are doing..." North Korea was actually once more economically developed than South Korea (which was dirt-poor and had GDP lower than sub-Saharan African countries) but the U.S slapped crippling sanctions on the DPRK, while pouring U.S aid into South Korea. The United States’ $35 billion investment in economic foreign assistance has helped the Republic of Korea (ROK), once one of the poorest nations, become the world’s 12th largest economy according to Borgen Project: How Has U.S. Foreign Assistance Has Helped South Korea You said: "Are you really this stupid? After every war/invasion someone is declared "ruler" of the losing party just to sign whatever the winners demand!" Then why not get all the non-Native Americans, Canadians and Australians to get out of America and Australia and leave the lands to the Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals? I mean, Tibet was part of China since longer than the entire colonial history of America, then why should we give up our ancestral lands?
    2
  11538.  @rr7369  Here's a video of modern day Lhasa, Tibet, China (filmed by WildFilmsIndia) and you can see how developed Lhasa has become under communist party rule. Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, and modern technology like cars, telephone cables, computers, smartphones, WiFi, the Internet, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like https://youtube.com/watch?v=3zIQlZopTPo Even the poorest Tibetan farmer can afford a smartphone, connect to the Internet and shop online in Taobao and have his purchases shipped all the way to Tibet in the Himalayas. Because Tibet is part of China after all.
    2
  11539.  @rr7369  "神州 Shenzhou Once again... it would still be a lot better with democracy and without the CCP!" Again, how? Look at Tibet's surrounding neighbors like Bhutan and even India (the world's largest democracy) and Tibet Autonomous Region is far more advanced than it's neighbors, despite Tibet being under the Communist Party of China.
    2
  11540.  @rr7369  Here's Canadian tourist visit to Lhasa and he took the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) and explains how each carriage comes equipped with its own emergency oxygen tank. https://youtube.com/watch?v=J-TfN56ETVM He remarks how much Lhasa has changed in 10 years since he last visited. Throughout the video you can see many religious people worshipping, praying, spinning those "prayer wheels" and performing full-body kowtows on the ground, so how exactly is Tibetan culture being threatened?
    2
  11541.  @basshunterdota625  How is China expansionist? China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    2
  11542. @Gatlin Grove The United States only nuked Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing Japanese civilians like women, children, old men and women, while the able-bodied Japanese soldiers were still away from the cities. Japan refused to surrender to USA, even after two US atomic bombings, and US soldiers didn't even invade the Japanese mainland. The last campaign fought of WWII was actually the Soviet invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria, which finally resulted in Japanese surrender in 1945. Source: Soviet invasion of Manchuria was the last campaign of the Second World War wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Manchuria So isn't it thanks to Communist Russia that finally ended WWII with the Japanese surrender?
    2
  11543.  @jimgraham6722  You said: "All countries use opinion polls and that is better than not using them. But in the end polls are easily manipulated, they are just about opinions not choices." And if the majority of Chinese people polled by Harvard University and Ash Center in their survey express support for the Chinese government, then how is that not a form of democracy in and of itself? Your definition of democracy is that "Democracy means the government of a country always reflects the needs of a clear majority of the country." that means China fits your definition of a democracy.
    2
  11544.  @jimgraham6722  You said: "The government there is dominated by a 'president for life', so people have no say.." Are you sure? President Xi Jinping put forth his policy of zero covid, but after a fire in Xinjiang claimed some lives of people under lockdown leading to small protests against the policy,, the Chinese government decided to loosen some of the restrictions. Is this not an example of the Chinese government listening to what the people say?
    2
  11545.  @icemike1  You said: "Like rare earth minerals are infinite" Rare Earth Metals can always be recycled from electronic waste. However, hydrocarbons that burnt up as fuel cannot be recycled.
    2
  11546.  @drmodestoesq  Those people starved to death because of the Great Chinese Famine 1959-1961, where bad weather conditions such as drought and flood caused the destruction of crops and poor harvests. Even Mao Zedong can't be possibly control the weather isn't it?
    2
  11547.  @MarkYeung1  Yes, China's successful strategy to become the biggest trading partner of many countries in the region, has made them reluctant to jump on board the anti-China stance by America. Taiwan's biggest trading partner is mainland China of course.
    2
  11548. Do you have evidence that she's frightened? Peng Shuai has previously appeared in public, attending dinners and youth sports award ceremonies, and she's even seen with Yao Ming and so on.
    2
  11549. Donald Trump said he would label China a currency manipulator, but after meeting with our president at Maralargo, he changed his stance complete. "They're not currency manipulators," President Trump told The Wall Street Journal during press conference in the Oval Office in 2017, and then went on to explain how Beijing hasn't been manipulated the yuan for months
    2
  11550. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning. China's Coming Financial Meltdown 2019. BBC. China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. NYT. Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak 2021 Bloomberg. Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize 2022. Bloomberg China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n 2023. Bloomberg. No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    2
  11551. The Philippines coastguard opened fired on Chinese fishing vessel and killing 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hung Shih-Cheng, but Chinese coastguard don't open fire on your Philippines vessels and kill your people.
    2
  11552. During WW2, Imperial Japanese forces invaded Korea, China and South East Asian countries like Malaysia, Singapore and Philippines, commiting atrocities like Rape of Nanjing, Unit 731 and comfort women issue, even in the Philippines. How many Filipinos have been raped and killed by Japanese soldiers?
    2
  11553.  @Alwaysonbanisland  Singapore could have chosen a wiser path, perhaps taking a neutral stance instead of taking the initiative to slap sanctions on Russia (which allowed Russia to list her as "unfriendly"). There is no need to create enemies when there were none before. In fact, none of the other ASEAN countries slapped sanctions on Russia, and thus they weren't given the unfriendly label unlike Singapore. Singapore abstaining from voting to suspend Russia also came a little too late.
    2
  11554. It's because many Americans have been showned a skewed view of China by their media.
    2
  11555.  @MarkYeung1  It's because their media has been consistently portraying China in a a negative light.
    2
  11556.  @MarkYeung1  Because many of them have been brainwashed by their media about China.
    2
  11557.  @TrickOrRetreat  You said: "China have no friends left in Asia, well ofc N korea 😏 it's time for the world to shut the CCP down." China is the largest trading partner in many Asian countries, why would Asian countries want to join the West in overthrowing the Communist Party of China? The CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China?
    2
  11558. ​ @dorianlindberg1662  You said: "I really hope that China doesn't end up annexing Taiwan as it has proven unfavorable in Hong Kong(understandably). It is always nice to have a nation free of direct government control and instead have laws in place to defend it's citizens." Even John Oliver admits that even though Chiang kai-shek was a brutal dictator, Taiwan was able to modernize and develop under KMT martial law,, and Taiwan under Western brand of democracy is actually suffering from parliament fights and government brawls. Taiwan's previous success was built upon authoritarian leadership not on Western brand of democracy.
    2
  11559.  @TrickOrRetreat  "You clearly don't have any clue how China operates. china emptied the sea for fish" China is arguably the only country to impose fishing ban on coastal waters (covering the Bohai Sea, the Yellow Sea, the East China Sea and the South China Sea) to allow the fish time to recover, improve marine ecology and maintain sustainable fishing. Video: China starts summer-long annual fishing ban in coastal waters youtu.be/fni7WYro_Cc
    2
  11560.  @TrickOrRetreat  You said: "They go to Africa offering to build a road, and suddenly they cut down all forest and leave. All that's left is a road ending blind in the middle of nowhere." Which road in Africa are you talking about? Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China youtu.be/TtduKDpy4oc China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    2
  11561.  @TrickOrRetreat  "China just promised to work together with America on environmental issues at cop 26. I literally laughed out loud. China only say s**t like that for cheap points, and will keep finding new ways to pollute." It was literally Donald Trump that withdrew the United States from the 2015 Paris Climate Accord, how can the world trust the U.S when their president can just flip on their commitments and change U.S climate policies with different U.S presidents?
    2
  11562.  @TrickOrRetreat  China built the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/j3J196bLP5E
    2
  11563.  @christt6809  "Why not letting the other choose for you what you want? Did your parent keep choosing for you how to live your life?" The question should be why let Westerners (i.e USA, UK, Canada, Australia, etc) tell Chinese how to govern our country? I mean, China's political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so? Why should China listen to what Westerners telling Chinese how to govern our country? "According to you, they should, since they have more experience and knowledge about life than you." China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. "What about getting inform and getting implicated yourself in politic?" If you want to participate in politics in China, then you apply to join the Communist Party of China and pass their strict criteria. The top 5% of students in all schools get recruited to join the communist party where they serve 1 year of probation and after which, they can participate in political decision making and garner votes from other politically experienced communist members. But again, why should ordinary people participate in political decision making? I already outlined several reasons why it's a bad idea.
    2
  11564.  @christt6809   You said: "Remember, it is the CCP that as bring China in absolute poverty before they finely give some economic liberty to the Chinese." The Communist Party did not bring absolute poverty to China. China's poverty was caused by the Century of Humiliation at the hands of foreigners. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us. "The KMT that you praise was a nightmare of oppression... and again, when you start from the absolute bottom, you can only go up." Yes, but you can't ignore the fact that Taiwan's economy flourished and experienced massive economic growth during authoritarian single-party KMT rule of Taiwan. After democracy was introduced, Taiwan's economy has since stagnated, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are seeking employment opportunities abroad. Even at 8:20 of John Oliver's video, you can see Taiwan government brawling and throwing water balloons and pig guts at each other, it an indication of Taiwan suffering under democracy. "Progess seems pretty big when you start from starvation... maintaining a balanced economy is a lot more complicated." So which other country started from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past and transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy today like China has? Look at India (the world's largest democracy) and why hasn't India surpassed China, despite being a Western style democratic country unlike China?
    2
  11565.  @OriginalPiMan  "Taiwan's economy is undoubtedly punching well above its weight." Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Here's Top 10 Mobile Phone Brands in World 2021 Ranking List according to MBA SKOOL. Top 10 Mobile Phone Brands in World 2021 Ranking List Rank 1. Samsung (South Korean) Rank 2. Huawei (Chinese) Rank 3. Apple (American) Rank 4. Xiaomi (Chinese) Rank 5. Oppo (Chinese) Rank 6. Vivo (Chinese) Rank 7. LG (South Korean) Rank 8. ZTE (Chinese) Rank 9. Lenovo (Chinese) Rank 10. Realme (Chinese) ... Source: MBA Skool But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    2
  11566.  @OriginalPiMan  "神州 Shenzhou Question: Are you breaking the law to comment here, or are you given permission to leap the Great Firewall as a paid propagandist?" You are demonstrating the fallacy of false dichotomy by presenting two options and seemingly forcing me to pick one, when it's possible that other options exist. The way you present your question is to force me to make one of two choices, A or B, when it's possible that other choices like C exist and so on.
    2
  11567. ​ @MarkYeung1  Democracy doesn't just have one definition and there are actually different definitions of what democracy really is. China actually have our own system of democracy, that is just different from the Western brand of democracy (i.e liberal democracy). China's government power is given by the people, and power is used for the people.
    2
  11568. No matter what Carrie Lam does, the Hong Kong protestors will find fault with her. Lam has formally withdrawn the HK extradition bill, yet the HK protests still continue for what? Lam said she's open to dialogue, but the protestors don't want to talk. So more authoritarian measures are needed by the HK government.
    2
  11569. Anderson 你们台湾政府不是说过你们会收回大陸吗？ 已经过了几十年了，但为什么还没动手呢？
    2
  11570.  @elijahfreeman5299  Had Zelenskyy truly cared for the people of Ukraine, he would have sued for peace long ago (instead of leading his country and people to ruin) and there had been plenty of opportunities to do so earlier. In March 2022, Russian forces had Kiev surrounded, but Putin had decided to withdrew his forces from Kiev as a gesture of goodwill in order to create favorable conditions for peace talks. But then Boris Johnson torpedoed those peace talks.
    2
  11571. China builds infrastructure in other countries. United States takes over infrastructure in other countries.
    2
  11572. The government of Syria doesn't approve of the U.S military presence on its territory.
    2
  11573.  @gioraus  Harm what minorities in Xinjiang? The population of Uighurs in Xinjiang have actually grown by 16% since 2010.
    2
  11574.  @gioraus  The info is readily available. The population of Uighurs in China was 10,069,346 in 2010 and by 2020, it had grown to 11,774,538.
    2
  11575.  @ZoltanDeluxe  China reported the emergence of a mysterious outbreak we would later call COVID-19 on 31st December 2019 to WHO. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China bought the West time to deal with virus but the West squandered it nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    2
  11576.  @xerozero976  Building what wall against the USA? Cyrus Janssen is helping Westerners understand China better, so isn't he building bridges, (not walls) between China and the West? If your assumptions are correct, and Cyrus is allegedly being paid to promote this same message by the Communist Party of China (supposedly), then what's wrong CPC promoting the positive message of "building bridges, not walls"? Isn't it to both China's and the West's interest if we cooperate to tackle global issues? Or are you implying that you rather see China and the West go to war?
    2
  11577.  @yslee1401  What's Meng's residence even got to do with the topic? Meng is still obstructed from performing her full duties as Huawei's CFO, because she's under house arrest. Because USA wants to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride that's all.
    2
  11578.  @Shilanga-w2k  Did I even made any stereotypes in my comment? All I did was link Jimmy Kimmel's interviewing ordinary American passers-by on the street whether they can point out a country (any country) on the world map, that's all. Did you see the video link? As for just naming a country, of course naming any country is easy, but as the interview shown, pointing them out on the world map isn't as easy as it sounds. You claimed that everyone you know can name a country, but can they point it out on the world map?
    2
  11579. Kishore is most knowledgeable about ASEAN, but gets less accurate the further the geographical region from ASEAN. When it comes to Ukraine and Russia (also Gaza and the Middle East) he tends to follow the Singapore perspective (which follows the Western perspective).
    2
  11580.  @christianmarriott3696  But that appears to be what you are doing, coming to America's defense I mean. Thus far, you didn't make any critical comments about America, but when others like me do, it's as though you suddenly leaped to America's defense, even though you've previously stated that you're British, not American. Also regarding your previous comment about countries going through an authoritarian period, China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. Yet why are you seemingly wanting China to "see the light and evolve culturally into the enlightened way of Democracy" when China is performing well today without Western democracy?
    2
  11581.  @PyroMax  Measure CFC levels and find the source of it? Don't you know just how big the Earth's atmosphere is? That the atmospheric winds can always changing and you can't just pin point where a source of CFC is being emitted from? You make it sound so easy to monitor which company in China is illegally producing CFCs, when the reality is more difficult than that. And like I said, the ozone layer hole is gradually closing up, according to data from NASA, so what seems to be the problem then?
    2
  11582.  @PyroMax  Because Hawaii is a group of islands in the Pacific Ocean, which is not the same as whole of mainland China. There are way more factories in China as compared to factories in Hawaii, so what makes you think monitoring CFC levels in mainland China is as easy as monitoring CFC in Hawaii? And the ozone layer hole will eventually close up according to NASA data, so what seems to be the problem then?
    2
  11583.  @valuedcustomer8922  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    2
  11584. It's the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (phobia of the West being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th Century, many have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic civilization state like China eventually surpassing the U.S someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    2
  11585. Because ads cost money, they are coming out of the price tag of the products (i.e the products have to factor in advertisement costs) so in fact, customers are paying for the advertisements, which are there to persuade us to buy the product itself.
    2
  11586.  @LiterallyMe2022  Lol, even Taiwan doesn't respect the South China Sea ruling, calling it "completely unacceptable."
    2
  11587.  @superduper5514  Why would the Phillipines want to go to war with mainland China over Taiwan? What's Taiwan to you?
    2
  11588.  @wom_Bat  You're the one who first brought up Russian Olympic Committee here, yet now you're accusing me of making a false equivalency? Earlier you said: "神州 Shenzhou like the ROC? I guess since the Olympics dont recognize Russia it's not a country?" which is basically you making a false equivalency fallacy here.
    2
  11589.  @wom_Bat  Also, why don't you answer my earlier question of why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations as an independent country? Is there some force preventing Taiwan from joining the UN like an independent country can?
    2
  11590.  Patrick Kok  Instead of Western movies, Asians should watch more Asian movies, whether its Korean dramas, Japanese anime or Chinese movies. Why not be proud of our own unique Asian culture? The world's largest outdoor film studio is actually located in China, so China is striving towards being a film superpower as well. Video: The Largest Outdoor Film Studio is Actually in China youtu.be/pWjsD-tJ9ss
    2
  11591. Chinese is among world's oldest most 'continous' languages still alive today, whereas other great ancient languages like Latin and Egyptian hieroglyphics have been classified as "dead" languages long ago.
    2
  11592. China is primarily testing this drone for disaster relief, not military missions.... ...yet.
    2
  11593.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "They would rather lean on the West." Australian journalist Julian Assange was incarcerated in Belmarsh prison in London for revealing the truth about the Afghanistan War and Iraq War, yet you're saying that the Australians have a negative impression of Chinese government (their biggest customer) and would rather lean on the West?
    2
  11594. U.S sending HARM missiles to Ukraine is going to do more harm than good.
    2
  11595.  @fcl3294  You said Mao said: “When there is not enough to eat people starve to death. It is better to let half of the people die so that the other half can eat their fill.” (大家吃不饱，大家死，不如死一半，让另一半人能吃饱) The original and complete quote from Mao was: "要完成计划，就要大减项目。1078个项目中还应该坚决地再削减，削减500个。平均使用力量是破坏大跃进的办法。大家吃不饱，大家死，不如死一半，另一半人吃饱。" Translation: "To complete the plan, we need to drastically cut projects. The (existing) 1,078 projects should be further, determinedly cut, by another 500. Using our power (resources) averagely is a way to sabotage the Great Leap Forward. “When there is not enough to eat, people starve to death. It is better to let half the people die so that others can eat their fill.” He said this in March, 1953, when talking about 第二季度生产安排 (production arrangements for second season) that year. So, this is not about distributing food, or whatever misinformed or deliberately misinforming individuals believe to be about the great famine that came years later (again, pay attention to the fact that Mao said this in 1953 when there was no large-scale food shortage whatsoever). I suspect that that Frank Dikotter did not put the quote into its original context, most likely omitting the sentence right before the “when there is not enough to eat” part. Also, in the quote, Mao was actually talking about cutting plans, not adding on to them in the Great Leap Forward.
    2
  11596.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Taiwanese per capita income is FOUR TIMES higher than the mainland." I've already explained the reasoning. Mainland China is home to the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion, whereas Taiwan island's population is a tiny fraction, at 23 million as compared to the mainland. Per capita means per person, so if you divide the mainland's GDP by our enormous population, then of course you'll arrive at a lower GDP per capita for the mainland as compared to Taiwan island. Which part do you not understand? India is the world's 2nd most populous country after China, and their population is increasing, but if their GDP cannot keep up, then the GDP per capita might shrink. Whereas if China's population shrinks while our GDP continues to increase, then the calculations for our GDP per capita will increase as a result of a smaller population.
    2
  11597.  @bartonlee3594  Population numbers MATTER when you're calculating per capita GDP. Because per capita means per person, so when you divide mainland China's GDP by our enormous population, of course you'll arrive a smaller GDP per capita than that of Taiwan island's smaller population. Also, I've already mathematically shown that if China's population decreases while our GDP remains the same, then China's per capita GDP will increase with a smaller population. Same explanation with India and the African countries, if their populations grow while their GDPs remain constant, then the GDP per capita will be lower. Which part of my explanation do you not comprehend?
    2
  11598.  @kvm1992  Previously under the Republic of China 🇹🇼, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today under the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    2
  11599. +Hector Vega Egypt today is nothing like the Egyptian empire in the past.
    2
  11600.  @hamiorg  There's was an anti-Chinese era in which America portraited Chinese as the 'Yellow Peril' and especially comics had Chinese villains like Fu Manchu (who wants to make all Caucasian women slaves to Chinese) and the Mandarin. Lo Pan in Big Trouble in Little China comes to mind.
    2
  11601.  @hamiorg  Why did you suddenly bring up Chinese heroes in those movies when you clearly asked me for Chinese villains? What was your point? And why did you suddenly started hurling personal insults against me (like dumbass, twit, dips**t, brainwashed, idiot, etc) just because my views happen to differ from yours? I have been nothing if not polite towards you, but you resort to making ad hominem attacks against me.
    2
  11602.  @prophetcitrus9638  Surveys have shown that only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan. Source: Polls show only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/2156237/what-would-us-do-if-beijing-decided-take-taiwan-force
    2
  11603. Isn't Patriotism the glue that binds peoples of a nation together? America also has their own patriotic slogans like "Make America Great Again!","America First" or "God Bless the United States of America!". If I were American myself (which I am not) my chest would probably swell with pride upon hearing those words.
    2
  11604.  @markgreen8045  You said: "Also, between Oct. 1 and 4, CPC’s air force flew nearly 150 war planes into Taiwan’s airspace; the 56 fighters, bombers and submarine hunters." When did People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) send fighters into Taiwan airspace at all? PLAAF fighters flew in international airspace, they didn't fly into Taiwan airspace, show me the evidence that they flew into Taiwan airspace like you claimed.
    2
  11605.  @markgreen8045  I'm also waiting for you to show how is Cyrus a warmonger, when his message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" is consistent in his videos. If you're claiming that he's spreading the CPC's message, then honestly speaking, isn't such a positive message good for the rest of the world? The alternative message (of going to war) is unthinkable and would be a disaster for the world, if US and China go to war.
    2
  11606.  @markgreen8045  So you've seemingly come to your senses at last? There are many others like you that had been tricked by Western MSM. Just because the BBC or the New York Times feature Cyrus and other expats in China, portraying them as so-called "communist party shills" but they don't have actual evidence of them being paid. Not only that, the Western MSM twist these expats words to support their anti-China narrative, when most of their videos just showcase ordinary life in China. There are so many others in the West, that have been led astray by Western MSM to already harbor a negative impression of China, without even setting foot in our country and seeing what life is really like here for themselves. And everyone who offers a different, more positive view of China is seemingly labelled as a so-called "communist party shill" in order to disregard their arguments.
    2
  11607. China deals with competition through self-improvement. US deals with competition by slapping sanctions on its competitors.
    2
  11608.  @farzana6676  Those territories are a part of China. Even during his visit to Beijing, the Anthony Blinken outright stated that the US does not support Taiwan independence.
    2
  11609.  @farzana6676  Even Taiwan's constitution states that the island is part of China. And US diplomat Anthony Blinken said that the US supports One China principle that there is only One China and Taiwan is a part of it.
    2
  11610.  @MarkYeung1  "Taiwan is free from communist rule" Incorrect. For example, Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can. Also, Taiwanese athletes can only compete in the Olympics under the name "Chinese Taipei", so how is Taiwan free?
    2
  11611.  @MarkYeung1  Hong Kong is ranked among the world's freest, according to many Indices of freedom. The Economic Freedom of the World ranks Hong Kong at number one with 8.91 while the Index of Freedom in the World gives Hong Kong a rating of 8.81.
    2
  11612.  @farzana6676  You said: "In fact Taiwanese government should be the only recognized government of China." But the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lost the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and fled to Taiwan, then why should the government of Taiwan be the only recognized government of China? They aren't even located in mainland China for crying out loud.
    2
  11613. New York actually got their cases from Europe, not Asia. New research indicates that the coronavirus began to circulate in the New York area by mid-February, weeks before the first confirmed case, and that travelers brought in the virus mainly from Europe, not Asia. “The majority is clearly European,” said Harm van Bakel, a geneticist at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, who co-wrote a study awaiting peer review. Source: Most New York Coronavirus Cases Came From Europe, Genomes Show nytimes.com/2020/04/08/science/new-york-coronavirus-cases-europe-genomes.html A separate team at N.Y.U. Grossman School of Medicine came to strikingly similar conclusions, despite studying a different group of cases. Both teams analyzed genomes from coronaviruses taken from New Yorkers starting in mid-March.
    2
  11614.  @jane29jeng  "If only chinese didn't eat bats like the rest of the world." The bat soup coronavirus origins myth have long been debunked by experts. Source: Is bat soup a delicacy in China? We debunk a rumour on the origin of the coronavirus observers.france24.com/en/20200203-china-coronavirus-bat-soup-debunk-videos-viral-palau-indonesia Videos of Asian people selling or eating bats have been circulating on social media since news broke of the coronavirus outbreak in China, with claims that bats are a possible origin of the new virus. The FRANCE 24 Observers team investigated six of the most-shared videos. Five were filmed outside China, in Palau and Indonesia. None of the videos had any documented link to the outbreak.
    2
  11615.  @lorellaldos5263  "Shenzhou. China has been colonized by western countries between 1839 til 1949 or something." China (as a whole) was never colonized by the Western countries. Parts of China like Hong Kong and Macau became Western colonies yes, but not the entirety of China. Russia was one of the eight nations that invaded China during the Boxer Rebellion period. Even if you use the excuse "oh that was easy, lets go there too" that's still an invasion of China regardless. You said: "Russia ended up helping China especially when the Japanese invaded 1937." Imperial Japan invaded the Chinese province of Manchuria in 1937, how exactly did Russia help China in 1937?
    2
  11616. Turns out that according to a Chinese satisfaction survey conducted by Ash Center of Harvard University, around 80-90% of Chinese citizens are support the Chinese government. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    2
  11617. Gopnik Conscript During Unit 731, Japanese soldiers performed live vivisection on Chinese prisoners without anesthesia, freezing limbs and amputating them, sometimes attaching them to opposite sides of the victims body. Sometimes, organs like the stomach were removed, and the gullet attached directly to the intestines just to see how long humans can survive without the stomach. Sexually Transmitted Diseases were tested, by injecting prisoners and forcing them at gun point to spread the disease to other prisoners, and then vivisected alive to study the effects of STDs. Women were raped and impregnated and were vivisected during various stages of pregnancy to study the effects of STDs on unborn fetuses. Japanese scientists themselves even participated in rape and then conducted experiments on babies they fathered with female prisoners themselves. Imagine if you were a woman captive during this time. Or imagine you are injected with STD and then forced to have sex to spread it to other prisoners. I mean, why not just inject every prisoner with the STD in the first place?
    2
  11618. Peter Byrne Your source said "Ethan Gutmann, former Canadian politician David Kilgour and lawyer David Matas claims China is performing 60,000 to 100,000 organ transplants a year." But in 2015, there were 126,670 organs transplanted worldwide. So how could China have made almost as many organ transplants as the rest of the world (USA, UK, France, Germany, India, etc) all put together? Where does China get the necessary number of doctors to perform as many transplants as the rest of the world? Source:126,670 organs transplanted annually (2015) transplant-observatory.org/
    2
  11619. Peter Byrne How is it they done extensive research? The number of organ transplants in China is about 10,000. Yet Kilgour, Matas, and others just blatantly exaggerate it to 100,000 transplants, even when the number of organ transplants worldwide in 2015 is around 120,000? Where do they get even such figures in the first place? And you people just believe these figures they produced?
    2
  11620. Peter Byrne What extensive research have they done? All they did was exaggerate the figure of 10,000 organ transplants in China to 100,000 transplants, even when the number of transplants in the entire world in 2015 was about 126,000. Where does China get all the doctors necessary to conduct almost as many transplants as the rest of the world put together? And you just believe the figures they published just like that? As for verifying transplants in China, the government already allowed experts from World Health Organisation to verify transplants in China. The international community and the WTO have even applauded China's organ transplantation achievements, but rumours still persist that China continues to harvest organs from prisoners, spread by the Falun Gong people. Source Experts refute claims about Chinese secrecy regarding organ transplants at Geneva congress xinhuanet.com/english/2017-09/10/c_136598143.htm
    2
  11621.  @theheavenlyoption  "神州 Shenzhou just do a search on youtube with islands south china sea." Since 1975, Vietnam has established 49 outposts spread across 27 features in the Spratly Islands. Vietnam has also built 24 pillbox-like fortifications on undersea reefs, so are those the military bases you are talking about?
    2
  11622.  @yslee1401  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwan welcomes Hong Kongers" Taiwan has no asylum laws and the Hong Kong fugitives that fled by speedboat to Taiwan were actually considered illegal immigrants. Taiwan issued a statement that anyone entering Taiwan should do so through "legal passage" implying that the Hong Kong fugitives by boat were entering Taiwan illegally.
    2
  11623. One of the latest example are the separatists in Balochistan, Pakistan, funded by the US to specifically target Chinese infrastructure being build there, infrastructure which would improve the lives of the local people. Brian from the New Atlas has covered this.
    2
  11624. +Backpacker One64 I don't see what's wrong with my statement for you to include (sic) in it. The event was in 2016, 2 years ago, so I used the past tense "took" instead of "take" so what's wrong with my statement? I meant that until 2016, China was ruled by authoritarian single-party KMT, and under KMT leadership, Taiwan progressed rapidly. Did you know Taiwan had been under martial law for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time? How is Taiwan considered a democracy when it was mostly ruled by KMT for much of its life?
    2
  11625. The Hong Kongers voted 300+ seats for those pro-democracy candidates, but many of them are green and politically inexperienced (some even admitted to being first-timers), so they're going to experience first-hand what it's like to actually govern Hong Kong (and clean up the mess left by the Hong Kong protestors) for once.
    2
  11626.  @Mikoyuu71  Philippines never went to the ICJ. The tribunal arbitration was performed by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which is NOT an official UN agency unlike the ICJ. So why are you claiming that UNCLOS is an international UN body when the PCA is not an official UN agency? The fact is that Philippines signed up to the Code of Conduct on South China Sea, and violated it by seeking out 3rd party arbitration instead of resolving disputes bilaterally.
    2
  11627.  @ronwaldoilagan6045  "Shenzhou. . An agreement must be followed." What's the name of the agreement then? Philippines signed up to the Code of Conduct which stipulated that countries will resolve territorial disputes bilaterally, yet Philippines violated that agreement and instead chose 3rd party arbitration in the Hague. "it was your government that initially militarized and constructed artificial islands." Prove it. I've stated that Vietnam built the first artificial island on Spratly Island in 1976. Two years later, the Philippines militarized Thitu Island in 1978. China is a late-comer to the island building scene, only begining construction in 2014, so how is China the first? "ruining the marine environment" China actually impose a fishing ban on the South China Sea that lasts from May to Sept, in order to allow fishes to reproduce and replenish their stock. Philippines is the one protesting China's fishing ban, yet now you're accusing China of ruining the marine environment?
    2
  11628.  @Avertus123  Mandarin Chinese is the world's 2nd most spoken language by number of speakers. Top 10 Languages By Total Number Of Speakers 1. English (1.348 billion) 2. Mandarin Chinese (1.120 billion) 3. Hindi (600 million) 4. Spanish (543 million) 5. Standard Arabic (274 million) 6. Bengali (268 million) 7. French (267 million) 8. Russian (258 million) 9. Portuguese (258 million) 10. Urdu (230 million) ... Source: Babbel
    2
  11629.  @AQuietNight  You said: "Other countries will be building up their industrial bases and China will have much more competition and few people to sell to." Are other countries (lets say American) workers willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers? If not, then the prices of Made-in-America goods will be higher than Made-in-China goods. Chinese goods are going to remain more competitive than say American goods. You said: "As reserves drop China will have to devalue the Yuan." If China devalues the Yuan, it means that Made-in-China goods will be cheaper than say Made-in-America goods, so isn't this a good thing for China?
    2
  11630.  @AQuietNight  You said: "Competition is happening now, examples being India and Vietnam." How are India and Vietnam going to ship their Made-in-India and Made-in-Vietnam goods all the way to EU and the USA? China is home to many of the world's busiest ports (i.e Shanghai, Ningbo-Zhoushan, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Qingdao, Tianjin) in order to ship Made-in-China goods at competitive prices. How can India or Vietnamese ports match Chinese ports in terms of sheer volume of traffic?
    2
  11631. Western MSM will no doubt, frame this protest negatively, that Chinese government is "oppressing" their students.
    2
  11632.  @Jordie-c4k  "according to the Financial Times the picture looks bleak." Haven't we also heard the same since 1990 from The Economist, Bloomberg, BBC and the other Western media in my list above? Yet despite their predictions, China's economy is still going strong 3 decades later.
    2
  11633.  @Jordie-c4k  You said: "Tariffs will make it impossible to export over capacity and dump it in Europe and the USA." Not to worry, because China can always export to Russia. Many Western companies have been pulling out of Russia, leaving a vacancy that is being filled with Chinese products. In fact, Chinese carmakers have rushed to fill in more than half of Russia's car market in terms of sales after most Western counterparts left. Also in exchange, Russia is selling its gas to China at affordable prices, after Western European countries themselves choose to stop buying cheap Russian gas, and instead resort to importing expensive LNG from the USA.
    2
  11634.  @Jordie-c4k  "but the margins will be lower and the lack of foreign investment and the lower margins will affect innovation." Foreign investment flows into China increased to CNY 580.19 billion in January-August of 2024 from around CNY 500 billion in the previous period. (Source: Trading Economics: China Foreign Direct Investment) Also, how will lower margins affect innovation? According to World Intellectual Property Indicators, China applied for more patents, trademarks and industrial design than any other in the world. Innovation is not driven primarily by profit margins.
    2
  11635.  @Jordie-c4k  I disagree with your second comment. Firstly, Chinese officials are more concerned about the ordinary people's opinions, than of pleasing President Xi Jinping. For example, during the pandemic, Beijing was planning to roll out a vaccine mandate, but cancelled the idea after receiving a huge online backlash from Chinese netizens. Same thing goes for China's economy. Secondly, China is NOT the old USSR. Today in China, everyone has a camera phone to take videos, as well as access to social media.
    2
  11636.  @-AchmadPrayogiRafsanjani  Look at Islam's bad reputation overseas. Of all the world's religions like Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism, Christianity, Islam, you don't often hear news about Buddhist extremists or Hindu extremists or Taoist extremists and so on. It's Muslim extremists that often make front line news, and the West is ignoring Muslim extremism because of their political correctness culture protecting ethnic minority groups. I am not the one who create Islam's bad reputation, Islam creates its own bad image itself over the world. China is educating our youth to be studious and industrious which are positive Chinese virtues and teaching Uighurs Mandarin Chinese (world's most spoken language by number of speakers) and about China's glorious history and to sing patriotic songs to cultivate sense of belonging to China. Don't American kids also learn English at school, American history and sing patriotic American songs too? How is what China doing any different?
    2
  11637.  @ritikasharma4578  Who is filled with hatred? Look at Islam's bad international reputation outside of Islamic countries. There are so many religions in the world like Taoism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Christianity, but it is Islam that most people worldwide associate with extremism. This is not my doing, Islam brought this own reputation upon itself. Then why can't China reform these Uighur extremist and provide free education and job skills training to prepare these Uighurs for the work force?
    2
  11638.  @ritikasharma4578  China is imparting positive Chinese virtues like being studious and industrious, to help reform the Uighurs to become productive members of society. Whereas the West is doing nothing, and it is estimated that around 4,000 people have left their homes in the West to migrate to ISIS. Many have become jihadist fighters in the apparent hope of achieving martyrdom. Source: Why Are Westerners Attracted to ISIS? theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/07/isis-foreign-fighters-political-pilgrims/399209/ If you do nothing about it, then obviously nothing will change, but if you do something to stop these extremists flocking to join the terrorists (like what China is doing) that you can reduce the number of potential recruits for terrorist organizations.
    2
  11639. Problem is that continuing to ignore the China haters, will allow their numbers to swell until it becomes too big to ignore.
    2
  11640.  @eltyjamessmith3482  So you are willing to argue in defense against a Vietnamese politician who so clearly broke his word, upon discovery of rich oil and gas deposits in South China Sea, and use greed as an excuse to justify its actions?
    2
  11641. ​ @eltyjamessmith3482  While the communists had indeed received support from Soviet Union, the nationalist Kuomintang (Taiwan) had also received US military aid to help them fight the communists. But the KMT were notoriously corrupt, having pocketed some 750,000,000 dollars worth of US military aid, until even US President Harry Truman made a remark about it and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves." Source: Wikipedia: Kuomintang Also, it was United Nation's own decision to kick out Republic of China (Taiwan) and to recognize the People's Republic of China (China) as China, through a democratic voting process back in 1971. According to United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1668, any proposal to change the designated representation of China at the UN would require a two-thirds majority vote and the poll results were 61 in favor, 34 against it, 7 abstaining and 2 non-voting. Next, the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response and the results were 76 in favor, 35 against it, 17 abstaining and 3 non-voting as shown in the following map. Source; Map of results of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Voting_res_2758.png As you can see, the US voted against PRC so how did USA betray ROC? The resolution was then passed on 25 October 1971, and recognized the People's Republic of China (PRC) as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed the collective representatives of Chiang Kai-shek and the Republic of China from the United Nations. So PRC is recognized as the legitimate authority over China through a democratic voting process by UN countries, in which PRC won with two-thirds majority vote over ROC.
    2
  11642. +anuj gupta Since when does China have dispute with Singapore? Singapore is not a claimant to South China Sea Islands at all, so why are you making up malicious lies?
    2
  11643. The United States sees: -Saudi Arabia as their gas attendant. -India as their tech support. -China as their factory worker. ... and they act surprised when our countries start thinking independently and making decisions serving our country's interests.
    2
  11644.  Charles Schmidd  Have Canadians themselves considered why they seemingly hate a country that they've never been? Look at Canadian expats in China, like Gweilo 60 and Daniel Dumbrill, they visited China and opened their minds to what China is really like.
    2
  11645.  Charles Schmidd  Why don't you want Canadians to set foot in China and see what life is like here for themselves?
    2
  11646. Meanwhile, the U.S is printing more dollars out of thin air.
    2
  11647.  @readyandwaitingwithasupris3693  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    2
  11648.  @findandgetanything  Why don't you show me Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed the declaration and when was it signed? If not, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    2
  11649.  @readyandwaitingwithasupris3693  About receiving funding, the Chinese government is pouring funds into R&D, and China already has world's highest R&D spending according to the following source: Countries by Research and Development spending 1. China ($553.4 billion) 2. United States ($511.1 billion) 3. European Union ($379.0 billion) 4. Japan ($165.7 billion) 5. Germany ($118.8 billion) 6. South Korea ($91.6 billion) 7. India ($66.5 billion) 8. France ($60.0 billion) 9. United Kingdom ($44.8 billion) 10. Russia ($42.6 billion) ... Source: List of countries by research and development spending wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending#List In the West, researchers often have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    2
  11650.  @AmitSingh-vi8jk  It was Tibetans themselves who signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) for short in 1952, affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So why should China give up our ancestral lands? Why don't you get Americans to give up Hawaii and Guam in the Pacific Ocean, so far away from the American mainland?
    2
  11651.  Moonland Almond  Again, what genocide? The population of Uighurs in China has nearly quadrupled from 3 million (1953) to 11 million (2020) according to ethnic group censuses.
    2
  11652.  @ericye7763  我在让他们看真正理由于香港抗议。
    2
  11653. @Dr _11 According to eyewitnesses in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053
    2
  11654. Peter Lee What makes you think China is a prison? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    2
  11655.  SirVixIsVexed  Murdered own people? China was undergoing Chinese Civil War in the 20th century, so of course Chinese were killing Chinese. Just like in American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans. Or Vietnamese killing Vietnamese in Vietnam War. Or Koreans in Korean War or any civil war for that matter. Which Civil War does not have people killing their own people?
    2
  11656.  @matthewmorgan7106  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA. The test is given every three years to 15-year-olds around the world and measures their knowledge in reading, science and mathematics. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    2
  11657.  @Andrew-ib7gs  Because you said Xiangjiang instead of Xinjiang, then why is it when I corrected you, you labelled me a troll? You can criticise Barrett's Chinese proficiency, then why get mad when I criticise yours? You're throwing stones at Barrett's Chinese proficiency, but crack when I criticise you spelling Xiangjiang instead of Xinjiang? Since when is accessing YouTube in China breaking the law? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    2
  11658.  @Andrew-ib7gs  As for HK accounting for 22% of Chinese GDP 30 years ago, and being less than 2% today, by bringing up China's phenomenal economic growth over the last 30 years, you're basically admitting that China's economic growth occurred under authoritarian CPC rule. Since you claim China is not a Western brand of democracy. So the logic is, since China's phenomenal growth for 30 occurred under the CPC rule, then should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Why abandon a system that works for China and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so? You said Hong Kong's economy made up 22%of Chinese GDP 30 years ago, well that's because Hong Kong was a British colony before the 1997 handover. That means that Hong Kong thrived as a British colony and only began to decline after the 1997 handover. So given that the mainland is successful under the CPC, while Hong Kong is suffering under their current government, wouldn't you agree that Hong Kong would be better governed were fully returned back to China rather than having their own separate government? Look at prosperous Shenzhen in the mainland, just across from Hong Kong and Shenzhen’s economic growth surpassed Hong Kong's in 2017. Source: Shenzhen surpasses US$338 billion GDP mark in 2017, beats Hong Kong and Singapore’s growth scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2128310/shenzhen-88-cent-hi-tech-growth-roll-hit-y2tr-2017 Shenzhen is roughly the same economic size as Singapore and Hong Kong, but recorded nominal output of 2.2 trillion yuan (US$338 billion) in 2017 thanks to its booming hi-tech sector. Over 40% of the output came from “innovative” businesses such as internet, biotech and telecom. And that's despite Shenzhen being under communist party rule, while Hong Kong is suffering under its own democratic government.
    2
  11659.  @sebg5145  Why not attempt to refute my points, instead of accusing me of being part of the 50 cent party?
    2
  11660.  @matthewmorgan7106  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    2
  11661.  @matthewmorgan7106  Besides fast trains, China is home to two of top five world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) and Tianhe-2 (天河-2) and in 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Video: Sunway TaihuLight named world's fastest supercomputer youtu.be/KEdsrT1mFAU Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion).
    2
  11662.  @wmjohns881  How's that Fake rationalisation? First you said China muzzled the whistle-blower, now you're saying China didn't? If China had not muzzled the whistle-blower, they would spread panic throughout Wuhan, causing more people to flee Wuhan and infect more people, so didn't China do the right thing by muzzling the whistle-blower? And back in 2019, there was no confirmation of human to human transmission of the coronavirus. The first human-to-human transmission case in China was confirmed only on 20th Jan 2020 and that's when the government began implementing quarantine measures in Wuhan shortly after. Source: China confirms human-to-human transmission of coronavirus (dated to January 20th 2020) theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/20/coronavirus-spreads-to-beijing-as-china-confirms-new-cases So why is China responsible for the global contagion? Had the whistle-blowers not been muzzled, more people would have fled Wuhan and gone on to infect more people.
    2
  11663.  @Andrew-ib7gs  There was no indication of the coronavirus being highly transmissible back in 2019. The first human-to-human transmission case in China was confirmed only on January 20th 2020 and that's when the government began locking down Wuhan shortly after. Source: China confirms human-to-human transmission of coronavirus (dated to January 20th 2020) theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/20/coronavirus-spreads-to-beijing-as-china-confirms-new-cases
    2
  11664.  @Andrew-ib7gs  "神州 Shenzhou You're so full of it Wumao." Why do you always resort to verbally insulting people, just because my views happen to differ from yours? There was no confirmation of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus prior to January 20th 2020. That was the date that the China first confirmed human-to-human transmission. Source: Aljazeera: China confirms human-to-human transmission of new coronavirus (dated to January 20th 2020) aljazeera.com/news/2020/1/20/china-confirms-human-to-human-transmission-of-new-coronavirus And it was the Spring Festival (world's largest annual human migration) so what makes you think China could stop everyone from travelling during the Chinese New year period? When there's no solid proof of human to human transmission until January 20th? And about your last statement, China clearly learns from mistakes and it's the Western countries that don't seem to learn from them.
    2
  11665.  @matthewmorgan7106  Laowhy86 isn't even living in China, what makes you think he knows China better than someone who actually grew up here?
    2
  11666.  @Andrew-ib7gs  Carrie Lam herself won the three-way 2017 Hong Kong Chief Executive election, garnering 777 votes out of the 1200-member Election Committee (which consist entirely of Hong Kong groups). What's the definition of democracy? That people get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders? Then Hong Kong is clearly a democracy, since Beijing doesn't cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections, it's the Hong Kong people who vote for their government. About pesticide drones, the DJI MG-1S revolutionizes the way in which farmers can utilize drones to manage and take care of their crops. Video: DJI MG-1S - Agricultural Wonder Drone youtu.be/P2YPG8PO9JU But Hong Kong clearly lacks innovation, it's been relatively stagnant ever since the democratically elected HK government took the over. No foresight and no action taken to advance HK's development. The people of Hong Kong consume mainland produce, drink water from the mainland and rely on mainland power grid for at least 23% of its electrical needs. Besides, you're not even a Hong Kongers yourself, you're from the UK, so what do you mean by "Our Democracy"?
    2
  11667. Here's the Chinese way to explain the Ukraine/Russia war in the form of a family drama to help clear up confusion about the situation: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), taking several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and generously left her with a lot of family property as well as paying off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (i.e NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain degree, (but) she was enraptured with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and someday dreams of marrying into the NATO family, and of surrounding and constricting her ex-husband. The village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the NATO family, because she was high-maintenance and loved to splurge money. Even his many wives did not want her into the family, yet they still encouraged her to join the family. In truth, the village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex husband and wife conflict, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift a finger and partake in the actual fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would have to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this helps clear up any confusion in the Ukraine/Russian war and puts it on a more relatable level.
    2
  11668. Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous affair with a much older man has been exposed, and she's expressed a desire for personal privacy in a videocall with IOC. But the WTA would have none of that, and they are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see, instead of respecting her wish for privacy.
    2
  11669.  @williamplayfair364  I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and while Peng Shuai was emotional and had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several years in fact, there are no allegations of sexual assault in her post. She even wrote in her post that the sex was consensual. Peng Shuai wrote: Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well. So according to Peng Shuai's post, she consented to sex so it turns out that the allegations of sexual assault made by WTA are not true after all.
    2
  11670.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou I don't recall which statement it was." Why don't you pay attention to what you wrote? You've accused me multiple times of saying things that I never said. I clearly said: "British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea…" yet you're supposedly correcting me by saying that it was UK? Why don't you pay more attention to what you wrote?
    2
  11671.  @johnnyrommel4113  You're the one who brought up Individualism versus Collectivism, I'm pointing out that Individualism is dividing Americans that's all. Even your actions, you just claim "I'm not one of those people, they have no rights!" _ But if you ask one of those people, they'll say you are the ones in the wrong here. It appears you Americans only seem to know how blame others, scapegoat others and wash your own hands clean that's all. Then how is America ever going to unite their own people, when Americans only seem to think about themselves and not their fellow Americans? Just like you continually ignore the 49% that voted for Trump, they aren't going to disappear overnight and ignoring them is only going to breed resentment among them, and further divide Americans. It's very simple to get rid of guns, just amend the constitution that's all. I mean, the American Constitution has remained unchanged for the last 100 or so years. Political systems are living entities and should evolve with the times, yet the USA is suffering from political stagnation. There is ineffective leadership, hesitation, stalemate, loss of identity, failure to provide social cohesion. There is increased scapegoating (blaming China for America's woes) and victimisation (claiming USA is a victim of China). Even you constantly try to wash your hands off them claim Americans aren't like that, refusing to acknowledge the 49％ who voted for Trump.
    2
  11672. 其实，新加坡也算是一党专政下的民主国家。 虽然一党专政，但它毕竟是通过议会斗争的手段获得执政地位，以政策制定能力和履行能力说服选民投它的票。新加坡政府意识到，一个执政党抑或说一个政府，如果有良好的“业绩”，让人民获得幸福、安全和有尊严，谁管一党专政还是多党执政？因此，新加坡政府在创造“业绩”方面下了许多功夫。 所以说，新加坡经验也可作为一党专政下清廉政府的良好典范。
    2
  11673. Australia fancies itself as one of the Big Boys of the West, like USA, UK, Canada, and the EU. But upon closer inspection, Australia is just not as strong economically as USA or EU, nor militarily as USA or NATO, so it's not in Australia's interests to be the "U.S deputy sheriff in Asia". Furthermore, Australia is probably closer to China than Europe and the USA, and would be in the frontlines if conflict breaks out in Asia over Taiwan island.
    2
  11674.  @Joeyknows924  "why dont you take veto power away from China and Russia ?" Why don't you do the same to USA, UK and France?
    2
  11675.  @Joeyknows924  You said: "Shenzhou. last 3 counties are democracies ?" Are you sure they are democracies? Take UK for example and did the people of Britain vote for their PM, Rishi Sunak? What was the vote result for Sunak?
    2
  11676. ​ @Joeyknows924  So the British people did not elect Rishi Sunak then how can you call UK a democracy? By your logic, China is also a democracy, because President Xi Jinping is an elected member of the communist party and he recently won his third term election.
    2
  11677.  @dobermanmacleod  Trump's words are designed to sound like music to the MAGA audience. But even after he came to power, he still continues the US foreign policy as before.
    2
  11678. Here's a short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China. (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience) Video: youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA
    2
  11679. The CCP has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc, to map out China's direction and our future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition. But US presidents have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only make short-term plans. So they can't make plans for America's future spanning more than 10 years, because there's no guarantee that they will remain in power that long, and the next POTUS can always cancel the previous presidents policies.
    2
  11680.  @MarkYeung1  If Ukrainian army captured Russian tanks, then why is Zelenskyy demanding that NATO send Ukraine more tanks and aircraft? If the Ukrainians are winning, then why is Zelenskyy calling for NATO to intervene if they are winning against the Russians?
    2
  11681.  @MarkYeung1  Russia did not attack Chernobyl, where's the damage that Russia inflicted on Chernobyl, you tell me? Answer: There's none! Russian forces merely negotiate with Ukrainian forces in Chernobyl and allowed them to continue their normal operating procedures for Chernobyl. You yourself didn't even know that Mariupol is located in Donetsk in Eastern Ukraine. You claim Russia attacked Odesa but this isn't true, then where are you getting your information from? Yet you claim Chinese don't know the truth, when you've been lied to by the Western MSM? Did you watch the video of Ukrainian Army torturing Russian POWs? There was an outrage in Chinese media over the issue, but many in West haven't heard of this obscure piece of news.
    2
  11682.  @MarkYeung1  Someone in here didn't even know that Mariupol is located in Donetsk in Eastern Ukraine. Someone also claimed Russia attack Odessa which is untrue that's all, yet he still claims Chinese get information from Chinese media? Chinese media actually give more details about the Ukraine crisis than Western MSM.
    2
  11683.  @MarkYeung1  The Russian military is conscripting because they foresee an increasing need for military manpower to maintain their de-militarization and de-nazification of Ukraine once their initial phase of the military operation is over. They foresee that the scattered Azov remnant might launch attacks in Ukraine cities after receiving NATO weaponry such as stinger missiles and Javelin rocket launchers (that could potentially target civilian airplanes).
    2
  11684.  @heidibenner1577  In ancient times, people switched from using gold and gemstones, to paper money today. What makes you think we are doomed if we use digital currency?
    2
  11685.  @heidibenner1577  BTW, China's digital currency does not require access to the Internet to be used.
    2
  11686.  @Music4567able  Agreed with your comments regarding @mark yeung. Some in Hong Kong still suffer from a "colonial mentality" after being a British colony for over 150 years. Even though Hong Kong has been physically decolonized from Britain, the "decolonization of the mind" is still in progress. Only once the mind has been decolonized, can the people of Hong Kong truly break free from their colonial past.
    2
  11687.  @DemosBrutus  I simply quoted Kishore Mahbubani words that's all. Did you even read my post?
    2
  11688.  @davethebrahman9870  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    2
  11689.  @akashkrishnat481  I specifically said that China is at peace and not at war with any country. I mean, which country is China currently at war with, you tell me? The People's Liberation Army (world's largest land army) hasn't had any actual combat experience since our last conflict in 1979. As for border disputes, which neighbour has China declared war with? China has settled boundary dispute approximately of 20,000 km with 12 countries out of the 22,000 km and is yet to settle about 2,000 km of boundary involving India and Bhutan. -In 1961, Nepal and China signed border agreement. -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1991, USSR and China signed Sino-Soviet border agreement. -In 1992, Laos and China signed border agreement. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border agreement. -In 2011, Tajikistan ratified a 1999 deal to cede 1,000 km2 of land to China and China also cede over 28,000 km2 of Tajikistani territory. China has had 21 talks with Bhutan and 19 talks with India but still fail to settle our countries borders. So any failure to reach a border settlement is not from a lack of trying on our part.
    2
  11690.  @pfemke553  Russia is already the world's largest country by landmass, for what reason will the Russia want more, more, more and more? As for Africa, Russia's trade with African countries is primarily to sell Russian products, not transport natural resources from Africa to Russia. Crimea was historically part of Russia before the Bolsheviks transferred Crimean oblast to Ukraine to mark the 300 anniversary of Ukraine joining the Soviet Union. After the USSR 1990 dissolution, Ukraine became independent and many ethnic Russians in Crimea found themselves stranded in a separate country from the motherland, which is why the Crimean referendum revealed that an overwhelming majority of Crimeans want to join the Russian Federation.
    2
  11691. World Peace? China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country (since our last major conflict in 1979) and instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is enacting regime change by bombing those countries and cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now USA is targeting Assad of Syria and Maduro of Venezuela.
    2
  11692. The importance of political education in Hong Kong schools should not be underestimated. Some people (but not all) in Hong Kong still suffer from remnants of the "colonial mentality" of worshiping Anglo-Saxon culture while harboring a disdain for anything non-white. Even after physical decolonization, the "decolonization of the mind" needs to happen to heal the mental damage inflicted by the colonizer on the minds of the colonized.
    2
  11693.  @df9440  China released waters from dams in order to relieve the flooding in Henan, who said that it was the cause of all the deaths? Source: China Blasts Dam To Divert Massive Flooding That Has Killed At Least 25 npr.org/2021/07/21/1018764692/china-blasts-dam-to-divert-massive-flooding-that-has-killed-at-least-25
    2
  11694.  @df9440  雨水也可以进入水库，与泥水混合后进入隧道。所以见到黄色浑水不代表是泄洪的水。
    2
  11695.  @df9440  我说的只是有可能浑水可能是雨水混合了其他污染物，仅此而已。
    2
  11696.  @df9440  没证据就别说了，为什么还提到其他莫名其妙的事?跟题目有什么关系？
    2
  11697. Agreed. Yet the media in the west still labels Huawei a state-owned company, when in actual fact, it's employee owned.
    2
  11698.  @SB-qo7qf  The first Indian PM Nehru had acknowledged that Tibet is part of China and that stance has not changed over the years, so how is it not India-Chinese borders?
    2
  11699.  @christianrodm  Yes, I said they maintain eye contact and aren't shy or looking away, but I clearly never said anything about maintaining a long duration like you are claiming in your argument isn't it? So isn't the whole premise of your argument wrong, since you seem to be inserting the element of duration into my argument, which is clearly not the case here? Look, you even said "that people lying may use MORE direct eye contact," here.
    2
  11700.  @christianrodm  "those are words that convey that the person is doing something/not doing something else," The people being filmed are not just maintaining eye contact, they are talking, dancing, singing with gestures, etc, so why do you claim they aren't doing something else? And you are the one who brought up duration first (I never said anything about duration) so how does your argument even stand at all? Also, like I said, nobody here is talking about "lying" we were just talking about how their smiles looked fake that's all. Look at how the conversation went. Rio Agosta: The inmates smiles never reach their eyes 陳方糖: 真的很棒 (Really awesome) CommaCam: Good catch. I noticed this too. mikei mikei: _Rio Agosta fake smiles... _ 神州 Shenzhou: They maintain eye contact and aren't shy or looking away from the camera, so why do you still think that it's fake? ... Then you suddenly jutted into the conversation talking about duration of eye contact and lying. But who here ever said anything about lying? We were talking about their fake smiles here.
    2
  11701.  @andrenogueira5058  Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of the Great Chinese Famine caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Mao himself couldn't control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because his objective is to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. About China's involvement in Vietnam, during the First Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons, ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla force with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help the Vietnamese fight for independence. From 1950 to 1954 the Chinese government shipped goods, materials, and medicine worth $43 billion (in 2019 dollars) to Vietnam. From 1950 to 1956 the Chinese government shipped 155,000 small arms, 58 million rounds of ammunition, 4,630 artillery pieces, 1,080,000 artillery shells, 840,000 hand grenades, 1,400,000 uniforms, 1,200 vehicles, 14,000 tons of food, and 26,000 tons of fuel to Vietnam.
    2
  11702.  @huunguhuynh5687  So many Yin Yang ☯ Symbols.
    2
  11703. +suraj sharma India is China's 7th largest export market, not the 2nd. China's top trade partners are: 1st - United States: US$388.1 billion (18.3% of total Chinese exports) 2nd - Hong Kong: $292.2 billion (13.8%) 3rd - Japan: $129.5 billion (6.1%) 4th - South Korea: $94.7 billion (4.5%) 5th - Germany: $65.8 billion (3.1%) 6th - Vietnam: $61.6 billion (2.9%) 7th - India: $58.9 billion (2.8%)
    2
  11704.  @andrenogueira5058  About the South China Sea Islands, China had claimed those islands in the SCS back when the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) published the 11-Dash Line in 1947. The People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 later removed two dashes to arrive at the 9-Dash Line claim, and other countries did not protest China's claims. In fact, the North Vietnam PM Pham Van Dong had formally acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese, in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. Source: Wikipedia:1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai Only when deposits of gas reserves were discovered in South China Sea, did Vietnam suddenly change their minds and started claiming those Chinese islands for themselves.
    2
  11705.  @andrenogueira5058  About the "continuous threats on Taiwan" well, the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lost the mainland to the _People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan, and even till today, Taiwan still maintains the claim that all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) are all part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Source: Wikipedia: ROC Administrative and Claims So since Taiwan can claim all of mainland China, then can't mainland China claim Taiwan as well? As long as Taiwan doesn't declare independence, the mainland will not resort to use of the military option in our reunification attempts
    2
  11706.  @andrenogueira5058  About the Korean War, Korea was once a single unified country during the Joseon Dynasty, until the Imperial Japanese invaded and occupied Korea for 35 years, after which Korea was (needlessly) divided into North Korea (by Soviet Union) and South Korea (by the United States). North Korea was the stronger country on the peninsula and they wanted to end this humiliating division of their homeland, and they nearly succeeded in doing so. By Sept 1950, Korea was 95% unified under the North, until the U.S suddenly declared war on North Korea and pushed them back to the 38 Parallel Line of Separation and into actual North Korean territory above the line, and up to China's doorstep with Korea. China then had no choice but to intervene and help the North Koreans push the U.S forces back to the 38 Parallel.
    2
  11707.  @YakuzaSRC  You said: "ignored China-India tensions, while saying China isn't at war." Well, is China and India currently at war with each other? When was the declaration of war between both countries? Otherwise, the fact remains that China is currently not at war with any country.
    2
  11708.  @YakuzaSRC  You said: "Last time, on Cyrus's livestream when I tried to ask something for Cyrus to answer, I was abused by the audience here." Do you actually have proof that the audience here is the exact same audience as was present during Cyrus' livestream?
    2
  11709.  @YakuzaSRC  You said: "When they were trying to build a road through Doklam pleatue in Bhutan in secret," Donglang was part of China based on the Anglo-Chinese Convention of 1890. The territorial boundary between Sikkim and Tibet was delineated in the Article I of the treaty in the following manner: The boundary of Sikkim and Tibet shall be the crest of the mountain range separating the waters flowing into the Sikkim Teesta and its affluents from the waters flowing into the Tibetan Mochu and northwards into other Rivers of Tibet. The line commences at Mount Gipmochi on the Bhutan frontier, and follows the above-mentioned water-parting to the point where it meets Nipal territory" . — Anglo-Chinese treaty of 1890 Also, what has India even got to do with Donglang when it's clearly not part of Indian territory?
    2
  11710.  @YakuzaSRC  There are articles published debunking the allegations of China's so-called "debt trap" diplomacy. One such research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country.
    2
  11711.  @YakuzaSRC  I find that the mentality of many Indians (but not all) tends to get very emotional when China and Chinese are mentioned. For example, the statement that "Anything China claims as it's own, must be theirs..." could just as well apply to India. After all, if India can claim Goa, Manipur, Sikkim, Nagaland, Jammu & Kashmir as part of Indian territory historically, then likewise, can't China do to the same for Chinese territories like Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, even the Donglang Plateau? We even have the treaties as proof.
    2
  11712.  @YakuzaSRC  "神州 Shenzhou India has a security pact with Bhutan, due to which it has to look into its security issues." Sounds like Bhutan is a pawn of India, if they allow a foreign country like India to dictate their foreign policy. You said: "And Dolkam is very near the Indian border. So, India has every right to be concerned." The irony is that India has literally been building roads at the China border all this time. They even have a Border Roads Organisation that builds roads at the China border for crying out loud, yet when Chinese road workers build roads in the Chinese territory of Donglong, India sent army soldiers to block Chinese road construction.
    2
  11713.  @YakuzaSRC  Backstabbing? It was Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai that had formulated The Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence (和平共处五项原则) to define China-India relations and which formed the basis of the Panchsheel Agreement. But in 1959, the 14th Dalai Lama led a failed rebellion in Tibet and fled to India, the Indian PM Nehru choose to provide asylum to him instead of handling him over back to China. This created suspicion in China towards India's motives regarding Tibet. About the events leading up to the 1962 Sino-Indian War, not only did India provide shelter to Chinese fugitive, the Dalai Lama, but Chinese government had proposed settling our border disputes diplomatically, but the Indian PM Nehru would have none of it. Instead Nehru pursued his aggressive Forward Policy of building military outposts at our disputed border, even going beyond the internationally recognized line. There were eventually 60 of such outposts, including 43 beyond the line and on actual Chinese territory. In the end, China had no choice but to react militarily to defend our sovereignty against Indian invaders entering Chinese territory. You said: "Most Indian now have innate dislike for the Communist system of government." Because the Indian Media try to downplay Nehru's aggressive Forward Policy of building military outposts at our disputed border (and on actual Chinese territory)_ while taking credit for "Hindi Chini Bhai Bhai" when it was derived from Zhou Enlai's Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, while neglecting to mention China's numerous attempts to settle our border dispute diplomatically. Yet when Chinese workers build a road on Chinese territory in Donglong, the Indian Army rushed in to block Chinese road construction in our own territory.
    2
  11714.  @YakuzaSRC  Those deaths were due to starvation because of the Great Chinese Famine which was caused by a number of factors such as bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    2
  11715.  @YakuzaSRC  You said: "But you will simply deny them, or call me names for saying that, and say I have been watching western propaganda." That's rather presumptuous of you. Did I ever call anyone here by names that would lead you to make presumptions of what my response will be?
    2
  11716.  @YakuzaSRC  You asked: "Show me examples where people have been able to overturn some of the government policy," Just recently, Beijing decided to drop a proposed vaccine mandate after the online backlash from Chinese netizens. The proposed mandate required people to show proof of vaccination if they wanted to enter crowded public venues in Beijing, but this proposal has been scrapped (as of July 8 2022) after criticism from residents. Whereas in comparison, some of the Canadian truckers protesting over a similar vaccine mandate, have had their bank accounts frozen by the Canadian government.
    2
  11717.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou Pull the records after 2010" The latest info is that population of Uighurs in China is 12,123,000 in 2017, so what Uighur genocide are you talking about? Where's your proof?
    2
  11718.  @mmm6214  Funny how China has fast charging smartphone, yet in the video, Cyrus claimed that Apple makes the most innovative products.
    2
  11719.  @magnetospin  You said: "It reaffirms people's beliefs that China is an authoritarian state. Only authoritarian constantly ask people to agree with them." Lol, what has mansana's statement even got to do with whether or not China is an authoritarian state? Is mansana a member of the CPC or something? And if you disagree, what will happen to you? How's that authoritarianism?
    2
  11720. Uchiha Madara Back then, India also supported Bangladesh Independence from Eastern Pakistan, much to Pakistan's suspicion, so why are you acting like India has Pakistan's interest in mind? India caused Pakistan to lose its territory of Bangladesh, yet you claim India gave Pakistan land?
    2
  11721.  @ChiefCabioch  "that's why NATO exists." NATO was formed in response to Soviet Union's military might, but after the USSR collapsed, NATO no longer serves any interests (except the U.S interests in maintaining their hegemonic rule)
    2
  11722.  @ChiefCabioch  I don't understand why you feel the need to boast when many Americans themselves appear to angry with the 2nd Amendment. Many Americans are mourning the loss of life after Uvalde shooting, yet you claim the right to bear firearms is angering Chinese? Where did you get such an impression? Also, why do wish ill of China and think nothing about reducing our prosperous country to rubble and smoldering ashes? Chinese people make up 20% of the world's population so why'd you want to wipe out a fifth of humanity?
    2
  11723.  vlADOLF PUTLER  Previously, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into a British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    2
  11724.  @ChiefCabioch  How am I rewriting history? After WWII, United States was still a manufacturing economy and could produce their own goods, whereas China was still mostly a rural, agricultural country after WWII, and both countries weren't dependent on one another. Fast forward till today and USA has lost its manufacturing economy while China has become the world's factory (i.e Made in China) and both countries' economies are intimately intertwined. So how will a large conventional war (with China no less) benefit the US economy? Since you claim that I'm rewriting history, then why don't you point out which part of history am I wrong here?
    2
  11725.  @ChiefCabioch  Where's your evidence that many companies left China? I at least quoted an article that China was the world's largest recipient of foreign investment, whereas what evidence have you quoted?
    2
  11726.  @ChiefCabioch  "But if you use google for your searches, you will not get the truth" So you're claiming that Google search results are not the truth? That I agree with, but did I ever specified that I use Google for my search results?
    2
  11727.  @ChiefCabioch  "神州 Shenzhou I'm not "claiming" anything, I'm telling you what's a FACT," Exactly what FACTs have you provided? I'm still waiting for your evidence that many companies left China, whereas I have quoted an article indicating that China was the world's largest recipient of foreign investment, whereas what evidence have you provided?
    2
  11728.  @ChiefCabioch  Factual advise? I never specified that I use Google to search, then why are you giving me advice on something I never said I used?
    2
  11729.  @ChiefCabioch  You don't even bother to answer my questions, yet you're demanding answers out of me? You just wrote an entire paragraph about how Chinese are "hate-filled" and "ingratitude" and that you have no qualms reducing China into ruble and smoldering ashes? Then if you ask me, the one filled with hate here is you, not me. Like the part about nukes, you keep on accusing China of threatening to nuke Japan, when the U.S is the only country in the world to have launched nuclear strikes against another country (against Japan of all countries) then why the sudden feigned concern that China will do the same? Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    2
  11730.  @ChiefCabioch  So earlier you accused me of being lazy, yet when I bothered to look up Nike and Apple's production in China, it turns out they hadn't left China like you claim, you just handwave it aside, even though apparently you're the one too lazy to even do proper research? Then how can you make the claim that companies are leaving China, yet be unable to furnish proof when I ask for it? Also, how is Taiwan an independent country? Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, even Taiwan's own constitution says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to its constitution or a formal declaration of independence, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. You said: "China's agreement in 97 at the return of Hong Kong was a Lie, they never intended on leaving it alone" The 1997 Sino-British Declaration is only valid for 50 years, which means that by 2047, Hong Kong will be considered fully returned back to China once the Sino-British Declaration expires, so can't the mainland lay the groundwork? I mean, it's the British that took Hong Kong away from China in the first place, yet they impose on China conditions just for the return of what is originally Chinese territory?
    2
  11731. Under Chinese laws, organs are only harvested from prisoners on death row, and only with the prisoner's prior consent. The organs are taken after execution, and then given to the prisoner's immediate family members or close relatives. Since such prisoners are sentenced to death, then why would they wake up afterwards with stitches?
    2
  11732.  @pewpew9711  Those high school kids who haven't even graduated yet aren't even of the legal voting age themselves, so why do their political opinions matter? They haven't even stepped out into the real working world of adults in Hong Kong, nor have they been exposed to real world politics, so why should the Hong Kong government bow down to the demands of these "underaged voters"?
    2
  11733. Pakistan was once part of British India, but the British partioned British India to form a separate sovereign state Pakistan whom been fighting with India even till today. Furthermore, India support Bangladesh independence from West Pakistan, creating another independent country. A country is strong if it is united and weak when divided and fighting among themselves. Once you lose control of your territories, they may become thorn in your side. This is why China fight so hard to hold on to our territories.
    2
  11734.  @dragonknightleader1  "神州 Shenzhou Why would having military grade semiconductors being built by a foreign nation be a good thing?" That's precisely the reason why China started developing our own domestic semiconductor industry, and how Chinese company SMIC achieved a breakthrough in 7nm chip fabrication.
    2
  11735.  @elliekwong3180  "Wait until China could turn the deserts into productive lands." Chinese scientists have found a way to convert sand to soil, by developing a paste made of plant cellulose, that when added to sand, helps retain water, nutrients and air. The paste is non-toxic, eco-friendly and affordable. Video: Chinese scientists find way to convert sand to soil youtu.be/idjegdl0L3Y After being treated with the technology, a 1.6-hectare plot of sand in Inner Mongolia has been transformed into fertile land since April (2016). The plants demand the same amount of water as those grown in regular soil, but require less fertilizer and bear higher yields. The cost of converting the sand is between 3,300 USD to 6,00 USD per hectare
    2
  11736. Many Chinese Singaporean grew up learning English, so a fair number of them have been brought up on Western propaganda demonizing their original homeland China. Many Mandarin-speaking Chinese Singaporeans been mocked for speaking Chinese (the term "Chinese Helicopter" comes to mind) but now that China is rising, Singapore government sees the need to strengthen learning Mandarin.
    2
  11737.  @markchan8110  Explain the origins of the derogatory term "Chinese Helicopter" (recorded in Oxford Dictionary) it was used to degrade a Chinese-educated person who spoke poor English. As a mainlander, I open my mouth and spoke Mandarin in Singapore and many Singaporeans could detect the mainland accent so some of them treated me coldly. But when I open my mouth and speak English, many Singaporeans warmed up to me. If anything, this is indicative of the mental damage inflicted by colonization on the mindset of the colonized. The British may have physically vacated Singapore, but the subservient colonial mentality of many Singaporeans still persists and needs time to heal. "Decolonisation of the Mind" takes a long time to heal.
    2
  11738.  @joeyxiaoqio8867  You said: "They should have listened to Singapore which strikes perfect balance from many super powers by maintaining neutrality" And what did Singapore say? Singapore literally sanctioned Russia, how's that for striking a perfect balance and maintaining neutrality?
    2
  11739. Tik Tok's servers are actually located on American soil (and Singapore) and the Chinese government certainly doesn't have access to that data.
    2
  11740.  @MarkYeung1  Well, Taiwan used to enjoy better relations with mainland until the change in their government lead to deteriorating Taiwan-mainland relations. So was this change for the good, or for the worse?
    2
  11741. Its true that China has seen outstanding progress this 5 years under president Xi Jinping's leadership. But there are specific age restrictions in place to prevent individuals within the party from accumulating too much power. So eventually President Xi would have to step down someday, but at least some of Xi insights can be preserved in this manner for future generations.
    2
  11742.  @ivanthegreat2.070  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china
    2
  11743.  @ivanthegreat2.070  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    2
  11744.  @publicdomain3378  China publishes more scientific and technical journal articles in physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences, than any other country in the world. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_scientific_and_technical_journal_articles Countries by published scientific papers in 2016: 1. China (426,165 articles) 2. United States (408,985 articles) 3. India (110,320 articles) 4. Germany (103,122 articles) 5. United Kingdom (97,527 articles) 6. Japan (96,536 articles) This implies that a growing number of scientific discoveries are being made in Chinese-language papers. So Chinese researchers hold the advantage here because they have access to Western English language research papers, but Western scientists might have difficulty with Chinese-language papers because of the language barrier.
    2
  11745. These foreigners sound kinda like the serpentza and laowhy of Thailand.
    2
  11746.  @ann-ie4hc  You've lost a lot of money trying out strategies found in online tutorials, then why are you asking for trading advice here? Is this some sort of scam?
    2
  11747.  @ann-ie4hc  Let me get this straight, you've lost money following online tutorials, yet you're asking for trading advice online from complete strangers?
    2
  11748. Frankly speaking, Trump was one of the few U.S Presidents who did not start a new hot war. In fact, Trump facilitated the withdrawal of U.S troops from Afghanistan, although his adminstration did not carry it out, and it was Biden that botched the withdrawal. And if people look at Biden's history, Biden did not oppose the U.S invasion of Afghanistan, wheres Trump spoke out against U.S invasion of Afghanistan.
    2
  11749. +Peter Ellacott But the Mesopotamian civilization is no longer around today, whereas Chinese civilization is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today. Even their written script (Sumerian Cuneiform) has fallen out of use today, whereas Chinese characters have been continuously in use since 1200 BCE, and is still widely used today. Chinese government is not perfect, but at least they fight for China's interests over the South China Sea. China claimed the SCS islands back in 1947, when Republic of China published the 11 dash line. Back then, nobody protested China's claim, not the Vietnamese, not the Philippines, not even the USA. Look, the USA even sent warships to help China reclaim South China Sea Islands and liberate them from Japanese rule. One of this ships was the USS Decker (DE-47) and was renamed ROCS Tai Ping 太平 by the Chinese navy. One of the reclaimed islands (Itu Aba island) was renamed to Taiping island in honor of the ship.
    2
  11750. +Kev S China has produced inventions such as the Four Great Inventions 四大发明. Paper and Printing have helped many people record and transmit knowledge more easily. The Compass enabled safer navigation and explorations, and Gunpowder has revolutionized the way modern battles are fought.
    2
  11751. +maca6 How to better understand nature, if we aren't allowed to fiddle with it ourselves? We won't learn anything by doing nothing, and the mysteries of nature will remain mysteries unless we illuminate them. Just because we aren't fiddling with human genes, doesn't mean that nature herself isn't fiddling with our genes, each time humans breed. Like I said previously, human procreation is completely random and spontaneous affair, you might get a "superior" baby or an "inferior" baby. It's all up to chance, and it doesn't always mean that if you let nature takes its course, you will automatically end up with "superior" all the time. However, knowing the triggers and switches can help increase the odds of producing babies with less defects
    2
  11752.  @richarde.halliburton8022  As for Japan's industrialisation, it occurred much earlier than China and Korea, and it occurred without democracy. During the 19th century, Japan began industrialising and modern under the authoritarian imperial rule of Japanese Emperor Meiji (of which the Meiji Restoration was named after him). Emperor Meiji abolished the Samurai class (because they no longer serve any practical use) which was famously shown in the movie The Last Samurai (starring Tom Cruise). That's why Japan became the most powerful country in Asia at the start of WWII, because their industrialisation occurred much earlier than China and Korea. And once again, Japan's industrialisation occurred without democracy during Meiji Restoration, so what makes you think democracy is the cause of economic miracles?
    2
  11753.  @jacksins1431  Agreed with you that an authoritarian form of government suites China best (as it has for thousands of years of Chinese history, during the reign of Emperors and the Imperial Court). China should follow our own path to success, rather than just blindly copy Western brand of democracy. Just look at India (world's largest democracy) and both China and India were once dirt-poor countries in the past, but China has surpassed India in numerous fields, which goes to show democracy isn't a requirement for success.
    2
  11754.  @richarde.halliburton8022  Taiwan and Japan prospered under the authoritarian rule of KMT and Emperor Meiji (respectively) it wasn't because of democracy that they prospered. Today, both Taiwan's and Japan's economy are stagnating under democracy, while mainland China's economy is bigger than theirs, so why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Look at India, the world's largest democracy and why hasn't India surpassed China, despite being a democracy? History has shown that Taiwan, South Korea, Japan all prospered under the authoritarian, not democracy. There is no requirement that being a Western democracy grants economic success, and China is living proof of this.
    2
  11755.  @richarde.halliburton8022  So it's just a coincidence that Taiwan abandoned martial law and adopt Western democracy, that Taiwan's economy began stagnating as it is today? Taiwan used to be one of Four Asian Tigers but since democracy was introduced to Taiwan, it's economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving for jobs in the mainland or Singapore Video: How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents | Insight | CNA Insider youtu.be/P3BCnPb8qHY?t=110 "From the '90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreements on policy matters. This produced less effective policy making. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be more conservative in Taiwan, so they do not enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou, Research Fellow, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica Yet you claim it's all a coincidence that because of democracy, Taiwan's economy wasn't as prosperous as it was during the authoritarian single-party KMT rule?
    2
  11756.  @richarde.halliburton8022  Towards the end of the Chinese Civil War, when KMT fled the mainland, Chiang kai-shek began transferring mainland gold reserves from Shanghai to Taipei, which form the basis for Taiwan's currency. In 1948, President of the Kuomintang (KMT) government, Chiang Kai-shek was losing the civil war in north-east China against the Communists. He began planning a retreat to Taiwan and he intended to take the gold reserves with him. Source: How one man took China’s gold mining.com/web/how-one-man-took-chinas-gold/ Estimates of how much was moved differ between sources, ranging from between 3 million – 5 million taels (113.6 tons – 115.2 tons). In The Archives of Gold published in 2010, Dr Wu Sing-yung, outlines how his father (head of finance for the KMT government) helped to mastermind the operation that saw over 4 million taels of gold be moved from Shanghai to Taiwan. One tael is 37.2 grams. So KMT in Taiwan had an injection of capital to kick-start it's economy, whereas the CPC in the mainland were in ruins, devastated by Japanese invasion and civil strife. So how can you just claim that Taiwan is successful while the mainland isn't, when the KMT transfered China's gold reserves from the mainland to Taiwan? This action made Taiwan richer and the mainland poorer. Yet under communist party rule, mainland China has long surpassed Taiwan economically, militarily and politically today. Today, mainland China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    2
  11757.  @augustuswoods4548  So YouTube automatically deleting comments doesn't qualify as censorship, but when China does it, it's censorship? Then you've already exposed your biased double standards between China and the West when it comes to censorship. Censorship is necessary because words can mislead and incite riots. Just look at the January 6th Capitol Hill riots because of inflammatory words uttered by the then President of the United States, and it can be seen that censorship is necessary. About Whataboutism, you're the one first brought up Native Americans, then why is it Whataboutism when I talk about the occupied lands of America? Just like when I bring up Tibet, you brought up your so-called parody of the Communist regime in China, isn't that a form of Whataboutism, since you did not address my point about the central government improving the lives of Tibetans? And what Tibetan cultural genocide are you talking about? If you go to Tibet, the street signs are in Tibetan language, the shop signboards have Tibetan language, the restaurant menus are written in Tibetan, so what culteral genocide are you talking about? Here's a video of a visit Tibetan schools where lessons are taught in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese. Video: Visiting a Tibetan Middle School 探访西藏当地的一所中学 youtu.be/pSWaFsLgEpU
    2
  11758.  @augustuswoods4548  How am I redirecting and obfuscating? You mentioned Tiananmen Square Massacre (those are your own words) and I have already cited sources that it's a Myth propagated by the British, since all verified eyewitness accounts say that nothing happened inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 and the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. That is the topic we were talking about, isn't it? The Tiananmen Square Massacre? I have been focusing on the Tiananmen Square Massacre, citing Jay Matthews that no one died that night in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 as well as a Wikileaks example by Chilean diplomat (Carlos Gallo) who said that there was no mass firing into the crowds inside Tiananmen Square. “A Chilean diplomat provides an eye-witness account of the soldiers entering Tiananmen Square: He watched the military enter the square and did not observe any mass firing of weapons into the crowds, although sporadic gunfire was heard. He said that most of the troops which entered the square were actually armed only with anti-riot gear — truncheons and wooden clubs; they were backed up by armed soldiers.” A following cable stated: “A Chilean diplomat provides an eye-witness account of the soldiers entering Tiananmen Square: Although gunfire could be heard, he said that apart from some beating of students, there was no mass firing into the crowd of students at the monument.” Source: wibailoutpeople.org/2017/04/21/wikileaks-confirms-it-tiananmen-square-massacre-was-a-myth/
    2
  11759.  @richarde.halliburton8022  So now that you admitted that non-democracies like mainland China can do well, then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so? When China has been far more successful under our current political system? And if you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of the their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of ROC Administrative and Claims. Source: ROC Administrative and Claims wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. So Taiwan can claim all of the mainland, then why can't mainland China claim Taiwan as part of our territory? Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    2
  11760.  @kammonkam4905  If you claim China is low-balling, and that the numbers are actually higher, that means your reinforcing the need for Shanghai to take precautions to prevent unnecessary deaths, so you're supporting the Shanghai lockdown isn't it? Then we are in agreement here.
    2
  11761.  @jordandthornburg  So just because you have some people on video saying, means that it's true? Only people who tested positive are being isolated, what's the point of mixing negative testing people with positive testing people?
    2
  11762.  @jordandthornburg  So you knew that "Of course it doesn’t make sense" yet why are you jumping to such conclusions? You said you've seen the video and heard them talking right? Then could you perhaps tell me the exact words that person spoke on the video, so that I can verify it?
    2
  11763.  @jordandthornburg  "神州 Shenzhou you never asked me for proof yet. You denied it before i gave proof and this is what usually happens when I say stuff from pro CCP people on the web." When did I ever denied it? Could you quote me my words saying that I denied it before you gave proof? All I'm asking for is what are the names of the people saying that, so that I can research and verify what you said. But since you're unable to find the names, then perhaps could you tell me exactly what words was the person saying, after you've seen the video and heard them talking?
    2
  11764.  @icefrost5355  你在讲什么？
    2
  11765.  @icefrost5355  你到底想说什么？完全看不懂你的意思。
    2
  11766. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    2
  11767. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    2
  11768. China is a meritocracy where politicians who fulfill their promises get elected into power. The U.S is a democracy where politicians who make promises get elected into power.
    2
  11769. German Chanceller Angela Merkel Served 4 terms while President Xi is only entering his 3rd term in office.
    2
  11770. Here's the Chinese way to explain the Ukraine/Russia war in the form of a family drama to help clear up confusion about the situation: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), taking several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and generously left her with a lot of family property as well as paying off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (i.e NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain degree, (but) she was enraptured with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and someday dreams of marrying into the NATO family, and of surrounding and constricting her ex-husband. The village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the NATO family, because she was high-maintenance and loved to splurge money. Even his many wives did not want her into the family, yet they still encouraged her to join the family. In truth, the village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex husband and wife conflict, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift a finger and partake in the actual fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would have to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this helps clear up any confusion in the Ukraine/Russian war and puts it on a more relatable level.
    2
  11771.  @CohnAlex  What makes you think Chinese don't have freedom to protest? China sees on average some 500 protests daily. In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass protests to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 protests (or an average of 493 protests daily) in 2010.
    2
  11772.  @vegamoonlight  Many expats used to have a similar negative opinion of China before, until they actually set foot in China and see what life is like here for themselves, before changing their opinion of China.
    2
  11773.  indiasuperclean6969  India has my condolences for the recent train derailment killing hundreds of passengers. Hope the ones responsible for this tragedy face justice.
    2
  11774. +Timothy Martino China can support 20% of the world's population, with only 7% arable land, and yet still have surplus agricultural produce to export to other countries. We have the world's largest pig farms and sheep farms. China's fishing industry accounts for 1/3 of the world's fish production. Our fish farms account for 2/3 of the world's aquaculture production. Yet you still think America feeds the whole world and that you can easily starve China to death?
    2
  11775. Agreed. Hollywood and American MSM also form one of the factions, and their job is to mislead and deceive the public masses, by painting a negative image of China to their audiences.
    2
  11776.  @Bitchslapper316  Did Brian himself tied the entire Ukrainian population to Nazis? Clearly not every Ukrainian is a Nazi, but Nazism certainly exists among the Ukrainian National Guard, even Western MSM like the BBC confirmed this (they even did documentaries on militant Nazism in Ukraine at 2:40 of the video) The thing is Western MSM is aware of this Nazism, yet they deliberately blurred up the Red Eagle Nazi symbol at 5:30 of the video. What's your problem with Islamists? Not all Islamists are radicals, and the difference is that Russian Army clearly have the radical ones in check, not left to control their whole National Guard like in Ukraine. And what has Stalin and Mao even got to do with this?
    2
  11777.  @dandanbroken8459 我是从看了很多日本动漫用这词来骂人，就慢慢发现这词的来源自中国的《史记·秦始皇本纪》中“指鹿为马”的故事。
    2
  11778.  @mechinizer6911  With the rate that new and better smartphones are coming out each year, why do you need a Chinese smartphone to last for so long then? And if you really follow the smartphone industry, you'll realize China even manufactures Apple iPhones and Samsung phones as well, which are of high quality. And even Huawei recently overtook Apple as the world's 2nd largest smartphone maker, only behind Samsung at number one, which implies more people in the world own Huawei phones than Apple phones. Source: Huawei Overtakes Apple to Become Second Biggest Smartphone Maker bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-03/huawei-again-overtakes-apple-as-global-smartphone-market-tanks In home appliances, China's Haier ranks 1st among the household appliance brands, surpassing even Western brands like Whirlpool and Eletrolux. Source: Top 5 Major Home Appliance Brands in the World liveind.com/top-5-major-home-appliance-brands-in-the-world/12024 top5ofanything.com/list/02df276c/Major-Home-Appliance-Brands-in-the-World So your experiences appear to be highly exaggerated in your attempt to blacken Chinese goods that's all, when statistics show China is move up the quality line.
    2
  11779. Hopefully nothing will happen to the CFO of Tik Tok, like what happened to Meng Wanzhou of Huawei.
    2
  11780.  @SteveIceT01  In fact, Tik Tok's servers are located on the United States, Ireland, Norway as well as Singapore and Malaysia.
    2
  11781. 但是为什么你觉得中国必要跟着美国民主呢？中国都不是美国，美国也不是中国。中国应该走自己的路，不要盲目的跟着美国。
    2
  11782. What if during wartime, you encounter an unlabelled fuel container/canister? How to identify the fuel then?
    2
  11783.  @sara.cbc92  Ancient Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by the rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (fine china) which were in great demand throughout the ancient world. There is an ongoing Hanfu Movement (汉服运动) to bring back the Chinese Hanfu pursued by the young people in China, many whom are proud of Chinese culture and 5000 years of history. Video: Hanfu, the Chinese traditional clothing chased by the young youtu.be/7v_DGXtQ110
    2
  11784.  @AutoAllan  I read on Bloomberg that Vancouver city in Canada has seen an surge in anti-Asian hate crimes, targeting people of Asian descent (including Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese and other Asians) even more than in the top 10 most populous U.S. cities combined. So much such that the city been given the nicknamed the "Anti-Asian Hate Crime Capital of North America" according to Bloomberg.
    2
  11785.  @junebug8485  You asked" "Sure, name one Chinese company that's widespread and everyone uses its product" Haven't you heard of Chinese drone company, DJI? They are the top civilian dronemaker in the world.
    2
  11786.  @junebug8485  "Sure, name one Chinese company that's widespread and everyone uses its product." Top 10 Drone Companies in the world in 2020 (according to Global Brands) 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Yuneec (Chinese) 4. Kespry (American) 5. Autel Robotics (Chinese) 6. Skydio (American) 7. Insitu (American) 8. Delair (French) 9. EHang (Chinese) 10. Aerialtronics (The Netherlands)
    2
  11787.  @junebug8485  Top 10 Mobile Brands in World (according to Global Brands) 1. Samsung (South Korean) 2. Apple (American) 3. Huawei (Chinese) 4. Xiaomi (Chinese) 5. Oppo (Chinese) 6. Vivo (Chinese) 7. Motorola (Chinese) 8. Lenevo (Chinese) 9. LG (South Korean) 10. Nokia (Finnish) ... Source: Top 10 Mobile Brands in World (according to Global Brands)
    2
  11788. Indeed. It's just like how in a 2-party system like USA, the Democrats and Republicans seem to blame each other for America's problems, and claim credit when things go right. Whereas in China, the Communist Party has no one the blame and that's why they continually strive to improve.
    2
  11789.  @srishtimishra19  You Indians allowed Britain to partition British India in 1947, creating a sovereign country Pakistan. Then Indians supported Bangladesh independence of East Pakistan, creating another sovereign country and inccuring Pakistan suspicion of India's activities. Each separation only weakens the once strong country. That's why China fight so hard to holding-hands on to the our territories like Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, etc. Because we don't want to end up like India and Pakistan, two brother states fighting each other, while the British are secretly laughing at the situation in South Asia.
    2
  11790.  @LisbonLion7  The Hundred Flowers Campaign encouraged citizens to openly express their opinions of the Communist Party of China. "Let a hundred flowers bloom!" was Chairman Mao's slogan.
    2
  11791.  @oceanbreeze89  In other words, you're saying that Taiwan is being controlled by the PRC and is unable to enter the United Nations like an independent country can? That means that Taiwan isn't independent after all, since there is something controlling it and preventing them from joining the UN. Even at the Olympics, athletes from Taiwan can compete under the name "Chinese Taipei" this shows you that Taiwan isn't independent after all.
    2
  11792.  SS3 Super  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    2
  11793.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  Why should I the Communist Party of China go when its doing an excellent job governing China? China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    2
  11794.  Jancy Varghese  So why India can claim Goa, Sikkim, Jammu & Kashmir, etc then why can't China reclaim Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, etc? Those were part of China's territory so why you apply double standards here?
    2
  11795.  @rajeshnayak9199  Look at India claim Sikkim, Jammu & Kashmir, Tripura, Manipur, Goa, etc then why can't China reclaim Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong? Why the biased double standards against China? Look at Indians complaining about their so-called "Pakistan Occupied Kashmir" there was even a recent border dispute between India and Nepal in which Nepalese police open fired and killed 1 Indian near Bihar.
    2
  11796.  @bhattaneel  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. And who says that Tibet demography has changed until Tibetans are outnumbered? Ethnic population of Tibet -90% Tibetan -8% Han -0.3% Monpa -0.3% Hui -0.2% others So how are Tibetans outnumbered in Tibet?
    2
  11797.  Jancy Varghese  India claimed Sikkim, Jammu & Kashmir, Goa, Tripura, Manipur, etc then why can't China claim Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong etc? Why the biased double standards against China? The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) for short on 1952, so it was the Tibetans who affirmed Chinese sovereignty over Tibet.
    2
  11798.  @satishramteke7955  Why should Chinese government have to go? The Communist Party of China has done an excellent job governing China so why should Chinese people overthrow our government and establish democracy? Because you say so?
    2
  11799.  Atma 01  How is China provoking Nepal against India? India is the one with border problems against Nepal, against Pakistan (their so-called "Pakistan Occupied Kashmir") and even border dispute with China, so who's the provocateur here? And what "Tibetan President" are you talking about? Which Tibetans voted for this "President" you tell me? And which country recognise this so-called "Tibetan President"? You're claiming that I'm bias when you clearly said "little Nepal" instead of "little dispute" so why didn't you specify which you were referring to?
    2
  11800.  @PasscodeAdvance  The Republic of China (Taiwan) claims more territory than People's Republic of China. Not only do they claim all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) but also territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Source: Map of ROC Administration and Claims wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg
    2
  11801.  @Srikar-on9ib  Firstly, China does not claim all of Arunachal Pradesh, only a small part of the region known as Tawang, which is historically part of Tibet that's all. Chinese diplomat even offered a deal to India and make concessions in Aksai Chin if India cedes part of Tawang in Arunachal Pradesh. Source: China ready to make concessions in Aksai Chin if India cedes part of Tawang in Arunachal Pradesh? zeenews.india.com/india/china-ready-to-make-concessions-in-aksai-chin-if-india-cedes-part-of-tawang-in-arunachal-pradesh_1982943.html But India just rejected China's offer and gave no counter proposal of their own to solve the territorial dispute. Since you clearly said (and I quote): "神州 Shenzhou I for one recognise China's claim over Tibet, does that mean that you recognise China's claim over Tawang of Arunachal Pradesh, since it's historically part of Tibet?
    2
  11802.  @whtkngofc  "神州 Shenzhou reunified? You mean stolen right"? Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. Read the history. So why should China give up our ancestral lands of Tibet when it's an inalienable part of Chinese history? Look, even the Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) for short on 1952, affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there's a document signed by Tibetans that Tibet is part of China after all.
    2
  11803.  @Srikar-on9ib  Even Indian PM Narendra Nehru had said that "China did not enter Indian territory" so how did China cross the LAC into Indian territory? You're just anti-China that's all and biased against China.
    2
  11804.  Atma 01  Look at what India did to its borders: ‪1947 annex Kashmir ‬ ‪1949 annex Manipur ‬ ‪1949 annex Tripura ‬ ‪1951 hitting south Tibet ‬ ‪1954 annex Nagaland ‬ ‪1961 annex Goa‬ ‪1962 annex karapani of Nepal‬ ‪1962 attack China‬ ‪1971 annex Turtuk of Pakistan ‬ ‪1972 annex Tin Bigha of Bangladesh‬ 1975 attack and annex Sikkim 1983 attack Mauritius ‬ ‪1987 invade Sri Lanka ‬ ‪1990 attack Bhutan ‬ ‪2006 annex Dooars of Bhutan ‬ ‪2013 annex Moreh of Burma ‬ ‪2017 attack China ‬ ‪2017 attack Bhutan ‬ ‪2018 invade Maldives‬ ‪2020 attacking one Chinese soilder with plenty of soilders first‬ ‪2020 break the border deal that made by China and India and said they killed 5 Chinese soilder Yet you claim China push Nepal into dispute with India? Where's your proof? You just trying to blame China for the border dispute between India and Nepal when its up to your countries to solve your border dispute? And the 14th Dalai Lama is certainly not elected by anyone, so what "Tibetan President" are you talking about? When was 14th Dalai Lama's election (if any?) What was the poll results? Then how is the 14th Dalai Lama a "Tibetan President" when he wasn't even elected? And the Tibetan Government in Exile isn't even formally recognised by any other country, what are you even talking about? The Central Tibetan Administration is not recognised as a sovereign government by any country and they receive their funding from the CIA so isn't this an attempt by USA to interfere in China's sovereignty over Tibet? The CTA is not recognised as a sovereign government by any country, but it receives financial aid from governments and international organisations for its welfare work among the Tibetan exile community in India. In October 1998 the Dalai Lama's administration acknowledged that it received US$1.7 million a year in the 1960s from the US Government through the Central Intelligence Agency, which had also trained a guerrilla force at Camp Hale in Colorado. Source: Wikipedia: Central Tibetan Administration
    2
  11805.  @digital945  Why you Indians allow the British to partition British India into two countries on 1947, forming a separate sovereign country, Pakistan? Next you Indians supported Bangladesh independence from East Pakistan, forming another sovereign country and incurring Pakistan suspicion towards India. Each separation only weakens the once strong country and once separated, you can't control those territory and they may grow to become thorn in your side. That's why China fight so hard to hold on to our territory of Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, etc. Because we don't want to end up like India and Pakistan; Brother states that constantly fight among yourselves, while Britain secretly laughs at the situation in South Asia.
    2
  11806.  @Srikar-on9ib  "Your country crossed the LAC and set up camps in Indian territory" That's not true, according to Indian PM Narendra Modi, who said: "China did not enter our territory, no posts taken." Why are you deliberately anti-China and spreading falsehoods?
    2
  11807.  @rickeydu8742  My point is that the population of Uighurs in China nearly quadrupled from 3 million (1953) to 11 million (2020), yet the Western claims of Uighur genocide still persist
    2
  11808.  @vihodanyet  Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why American monopolies like Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple dominate their respective industries and eliminated competition from smaller American firms, stifling innovation through competition in the process. China's anti-monopoly laws are clamping down on anti-competitive practices in Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, etc so that smaller companies can emerge in the market, resulting in innovation through competition.
    2
  11809. There's nothing wrong with the 3D world, what China's Metaverse aims to do is to facilitate integration of cyberspace with real space. However, the U.S's Metaverse aims to create a separate cyberspace from real space.
    2
  11810. China builds infrastructure. USA bombs infrastructure.
    2
  11811. Carrie Lam won the 2017 Hong Kong election, garnering over 700 votes out of the 1200 member Election Committee (which consist of Hong Kong groups)
    2
  11812. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 China is the world's most populous country, so statistically, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    2
  11813.  NEO GEO  China is investing in robotics and automation to make up for our aging population. China is already the world's largest automation market, and with further investment into Artificial Intelligence systems and 5G technologies, why is it unfathomable to you that China can some day surpass the United States as the premier world superpower in the future?
    2
  11814.  Vikash kumar  Source: WHO team says theory Covid began in Wuhan lab ‘extremely unlikely theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/09/wuhan-laboratory-leak-covid-origin-theory-unlikely-says-who-team The World Health Organization team that visited Wuhan to investigate the origins of the coronavirus pandemic has all but dismissed a theory that the virus leaked from a laboratory, while giving some credence to China’s focus on the possibility of transmission via frozen food.
    2
  11815. @🤡 Chairman ☭ Meao 🍑 Look at Miami building collapse and you want to complain about China's infrastructure? Video: Surfside building collapse: Death toll rises to 32 as 4 additional victims recovered youtu.be/664FV_lQia4
    2
  11816.  @tonypeterson5316  Because Presidential term limits were abolished in China in 2018, after Deng, Jiang and Hu have completed their 2 terms.
    2
  11817.  @tonypeterson5316  "why was China so poor? Why were so many living under poverty? Why was their military so outdated?" More of your incessant questions. Much of China's vast wealth was plundered by Western powers during the Century of Humiliation. During the 19th Century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so the British wages two wars with China and forced us to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Chinese port cities like Hong Kong was taken and made in to a British colony, in order to spread the addiction throughout the rest of China. (Even after the 1997 return of Hong Kong to China, China had to agree to the Sino-British Declaration in order for Britain to handover what's originally China's) There were several other events, such as the sacking of the Old Summer Palace (圆明园). The Old Summer Palace was home to many of China's exquisite artworks – sculptures, porcelain, jade, silk robes, elaborate textiles, gold objects, but was looted by the French and British soldiers and are now located in 47 museums around the world, according to UNESCO. Then we have the Boxer Rebellion, where Eight Nations (Germany, Japan, Russia, Britain, France, the United States, Italy, and Austria-Hungary) formed an alliance to invade China, kill our men, plunder our wealth and carve up China's territory like a pie (in that infamous French Cartoon) and serve it to themselves. It's a combination of these factors that resulted in China's wealth being looted and our country descending into poverty and our military becoming outdated.
    2
  11818.  @tonypeterson5316  I mean, are you even Chinese yourself in the first place? Otherwise, why do you harbor so much intense hatred towards Mao Zedong, such that you would ignore his achievements for China? Why would a foreigner take such a negative view of the founding father of another country?
    2
  11819.  @monkbro5321  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  11820.  @andrethorpe6183  "Like all cultures, our western way of life will fade into obscurity with the passage of time. It is the cycle of life....Old civilizations fade away in time." China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt and Mesopotamia eventually succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of empires, the rise and fall of numerous other nations, and yet China has survived the arduous passage of history to modern times relatively intact.
    2
  11821.  @raymondhoffman3587  Did your friend break the law in Hong Kong, until the police had to install an app on his phone to monitor him? During the Hong Kong riots, the mask-wearing rioters were throwing bricks, petrolbombs, breaking glass windows and setting fire to shops, so perhaps was your friend involved in those acts of violence, vandalism or arsonism?
    2
  11822.  @raymondhoffman3587  About elections in Hong Kong, previously before the 1997 return, Hong Kong was under the authoritarian colonial rule of Britain, during which the people of Hong Kong did not get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders for 150 years as a British colony, so it's actually thanks to the One Country, Two Systems policy put forth by the mainland, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections.
    2
  11823.  @raymondhoffman3587  About the ability to continuously serve as leader, China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US short term leadership.
    2
  11824.  @storage4539  The right to self-determination granted by the UN on imperial colonies applies to those who were previously independent. But Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    2
  11825.  @raymondhoffman3587  I didn't really ask whether he's a mainlander, I'm asking did he break the law? Or is he living in one of thosee Covid-19 hotspot regions?
    2
  11826.  @storage4539  Who said that PLA soldiers were disguised as Hong Kong Police? The PLA troops stationed in Hong Kong did emerge from their barracks, but only to help sweep the roads and clean up the mess and damage made by Hong Kong rioters in the wake of their acts of destruction of public property.
    2
  11827.  @raymondhoffman3587  "神州 Shenzhou Not sure why they HAVE to accept a new tyranny from an old." So you've acknowledged that before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was previously under the tyrannical rule of colonial Britain (during which there was practically no elections) for over 150 years. Then why honestly should Hong Kong suddenly be governed by Western-style democracy, given that their history has never been one of democracy? How is this what-about-tism, when I've been talking about Hong Kong's history all this time?
    2
  11828.  @storage4539  Well, Hong Kong was taken from China by the British during the 19th century, so when Hong Kong was returned back to China on 1997, can't China remove Hong Kong from the UN, since it's part of China? As for changing the political structure of Hong Kong, the British ruled Hong Kong under authoritarian colonial rule for 150 years, during which Hong Kong practically did not enjoy democracy while it was a British colony, it was actually during the period of Hong Kong's 1997 return to mainland that Hong Kong people finally get to vote under the One Country, Two System Policy. You said: "The problem with Article 45 is the portion you chose to skip. "....The ultimate aim is the selection of the Chief Executive by universal suffrage upon nomination by a broadly representative nominating committee in accordance with democratic procedures." I have read that line, but what's seems to be the problem? It just states that universal suffrage is the ultimate aim, but since there is no deadline, then basically there is no promise of granting universal suffrage to Hong Kong. It just states that that's a aim (a goal) that's all, not a promise. And the point remains in the earlier portion of Article 45, that Beijing (aka the Central People's Government) reserves the right to appoint the Hong Kong Chief Executive in light of the actual situation in Hong Kong. So China isn't actually violating the Hong Kong Basic Law, nor the Sino-British Declaration by appointing the Chief Executive. You said: "During one of the riots, an officer in HK police uniform was yelling at another policeman saying "you don't deserve to be a soldier" in Mandarin." What's the name of that officer who yelled such a line? Do you actually have proof that those words were from the HK police officer or was it from just one of the passers-by that happens to speak Mandarin? So according to your logic, because Joshua Wong speaks in English (albeit brokenly and with a heavy accent) it means that he's an Western spy?
    2
  11829.  @storage4539  The Hong Kong Police Force did a remarkable job during the 2019 Hong Kong protests, since despite the violence (i.e firebombing and the throwing bricks) perpetuated by the Hong Kong rioters, there were 0 deaths by the HKPF. Compared to previous Hong Kong riots under British Rule, such as the 1967 Hong Kong riots (51 deaths) and the 1956 Hong Kong riots (59 deaths). This is a testament to how far the HKPF has come since after the 1997 handover, and demonstrates the incredible restraint exhibited by the HKPF, that there were 0 deaths by them, even when faced with the violence of the Hong Kong rioters.
    2
  11830.  @storage4539  If the British truly wanted to give democracy to the Hong Kongers, then why didn't they do so for all 150 years Hong Kong existed as a British colony? Instead they only did so near the end and just before Hong Kong's 1997 return to mainland China. Article 45 clearly states that the Central People's Government (aka Beijing) reserves the right to appoint the Hong Kong Chief Executive in light of the actual situation of Hong Kong. Also, there is no stated deadline for universal suffrage in Article 45, so it's just an aim (a goal), not a promise of universal suffrage. Therefore China isn't violating Hong Kong Basic Law nor the Sino-British Declaration in any way. And you don't even know the name of the two HK officers then how can you prove that they are PLA soldiers? According to HKPF recruitment criteria, you must be a Hong Kong permanent resident that has lived in Hong Kong for the last seven years and you must be able to speak Cantonese fluently, so doesn't this rule out the possibly that those two are from the PLA?
    2
  11831.  @storage4539  Have you seen the video of an elderly 65-year old Hong Kong man getting hit by a stray brick thrown by Hong Kong rioters? Or the one where rioters doused a man in flammable liquid and lit him on fire? Or rioters hurling petrol bombs at Hong Kong police. Yet miraculously, there were 0 deaths by the HKPF during the 2019 Hong Kong riot, it just goes to show that despite the violence of the protestors, the HKPF demonstrated incredible restraint and still treated them as humans.
    2
  11832.  @storage4539  So despite the violence exhibited by the 2019 Hong Kong rioters, the HKPF demonstrated tremendous patience and there were 0 deaths by the HKPF, indicating the HKPF treated the protestors like humans, why do you keep on saying that they don't treat HK people as humans? If you want to look at real dehumanization, look at the African Americans getting shot/killed by U.S police, such as George Floyd, Ahmaud Abbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks, and so on.
    2
  11833.  @storage4539  But you've been consistently claiming HKPF don't treat the protestors as human, yet there are 0 deaths by the HKPF during the 2019 Hong Kong riots, then this already shows that HKPF at least value the protestor's lives. Whereas the African Americans have been killed/shot at the hands of U.S Police officers, and the killers of while George Floyd's killer was arrested, the others like Ahmaud Abbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brookes did not have their killers arrested. And what video of Shenzhen policeman kneeing on a woman's head? Shenzhen policemen don't even carry guns about in person.
    2
  11834.  @storage4539  Turns out that the woman named Cheng wanted to review the security footage and the Luohu district police published a statement for the incident, saying that the officer did not let Cheng review the CCTV footage with them due to privacy reasons. However, Cheng, who was drunk, then pushed and hit the officer, who then retrained her with 'his bare hands' after she failed to stop attacking the policeman. A separate CCTV footage published on Tuesday shows the verbal argument between the woman and the police officer escalating into a physical altercation as they pushed and hit each other. In any case, the woman is alive, showing the restraint of the police officer, unlike the African Americans like George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks who were shot/killed at the hands of US officers.
    2
  11835.  @storage4539  Why are we suddenly talking about Shenzhen police? When the fact remains that HKPF treated the 2019 protestors like humans and there were 0 deaths by the HKPF despite the violence by the protestors? Yet you constantly claimed that HKPF dehumanised the protestors, but the fact that there were no deaths by the HKPF says otherwise. And even you admitted that the woman in Shenzhen did not die, whereas you can't say the same for George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks and other African American victims.
    2
  11836.  @storage4539  But whoever said that we are honoring Hong Kong police brutality in HK? I've already shown that Hong Kong police demonstrated considerable restraint so much such that there were 0 deaths by the HKPF during the 2019 Hong Kong riots compared to while Hong Kong was previously under British colonial rule. Yet you repeatedly claimed that Hong Kong police dehumanised the protestors, but this is clearly not the case since there would be deaths of protestors if they were dehumanised by the HKPF. You also claimed earlier that somehow PLA troops were part of the HKPF, but you have no proof, you can't even give me the name of the Hong Kong officers, and just hearing Mandarin being spoken doesn't quite count as proof. I mean, if the Hong Kong officers spoke English, does that mean that they are suddenly American soldiers or British soldiers (or soldiers from any English-speaking country) in disguise? HKPF clearly stated in their recruitment criteria that you must be a Hong Kong permanent resident that has lived in Hong Kong for the last seven years and be able to speak Cantonese fluently. And even if you bring up Cheng's encounter with the Shenzhen police to compare with George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks, etc, the end result is that the Cheng survived, compared to the African Americans getting shot/killed by American police, so which police force is really the one dehumanising others?
    2
  11837.  @storage4539  I watched that video (105-你不配做軍人), it shows a policeman in HKPF police gear, speaking to what appears to be a civilian wearing a grey shirt. But do you actually have evidence that the man wearing a grey shirt is a Hong Kong policeman? He could just be an ordinary person on the street who only understands Mandarin Chinese, and the Hong Kong policemen spoke to him in Mandarin that's all. So you don't have the soldiers names, then why are you jumping to conclusion that PLA soldiers are in the HKPF? According to HKPF recruitment requirements, you must be a Hong Kong permanent resident that has lived in Hong Kong for the last seven years and you must be able to speak Cantonese fluently if you want to join the HKPF. Again, I bring up the actual deaths of African Americans at the hands of American police officers, like George Floyd, Ahmaud Abbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks, that's an prime example of U.S officers dehumanizing the people they arrest. But compared to that, there were 0 deaths by HKPF during the 2019 Hong Kong riots, which is a testament to the restraint shown by the HKPF, yet you've repeatedly claim the Hong Kong police dehumanize the protestors when this is clearly not the case. Even Cheng did not die in the Shenzhen police scenario, unlike George Floyd.
    2
  11838.  @storage4539  I said that despite the violence perpetrated by the 2019 Hong Kong protestors, the HKPF demonstrated great restraint, that's why there were 0 deaths by the HKPF during the 2019 Hong Kong riots. But you've repeatedly claimed that the HKPF were dehumanising the protestors when this isn't true, because otherwise why were there zero deaths by the HKPF if they were allegedly dehumanising the protestors like you claimed? I brought up African Americans such as George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks, dying at the hands of American police to show that their police dehumanise the people. Whereas you brought up the Shenzhen police, yet Cheng is clearly alive, not death like George Floyd and the others. Names are important because they help humanise the person you are talking about. So I take it that you have no evidence that the civilian in grey is from HKPF in that video you told me to watch, then why are you jumping to the conclusion that PLA soldiers are in the HKPF? According to HKPF recruitment requirements, you must be a permanent resident of at least 7 years and be able to speak Cantonese fluently to join the HKPF. Yes I even heard a woman speaking Mandarin in the video. You know who else besides mainlanders who speak Mandarin? People from Taiwan speak Mandarin too, so again, how can you jump to the conclusion that PLA soldiers are in the HKPF without proof?
    2
  11839.  @storage4539  I've already stated that the HKPF demonstrated incredible restraint and as a result, there were 0 deaths by the HKPF during the 2019 Hong Kong riots, yet you've repeatedly claimed that the HKPF were dehumanizing the protestors? Then why is it there weren't any deaths by the HKPF during the 2019 riots? Compared to the deaths of African Americans like George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks at the hands of American police? Even in Shenzhen police video, Cheng did not die, but you can't say the same for the African Americans. So I take it you don't have proof that the civilian man in grey is from the HKPF? Then why jump to conclusions that he is from PLA and he is in HKPF? If you watch the video, the woman narrating is speaking in Putonghua (Mandarin) herself, and given the traditional Chinese characters subtitles, it's probably a someone from Taiwan filming the incident. So you can't discount the fact that there are other Mandarin speaking regions in the world, such as Taiwan, possibly Singapore and some ASEAN countries.
    2
  11840.  @storage4539  Once again, I'm talking about humanizing, whereas you're talking about dehumanizing. You repeatedly said that the HKPF dehumanized the 2019 protestors, but if that was the case, then why are there 0 deaths by the HKPF despite the violence of the protestors? If you're claim about dehumanizing is true, then the deaths of African Americans like George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks at the hands of American police would be a real case study in seeing how police dehumanize the people, not the case with Shenzhen police. Cheng is still very much alive after all. I'm still waiting for your evidence of that the man in grey shirt seen in that video as being a HKPF member. Since I've already previously stated the HKPF recruitment requirement of being a Hong Kong permanent resident for at least 7 years and being fluent in Cantonese, this already rules out the possibility of the man in grey being part of the HKPF.
    2
  11841.  @storage4539  1) So were the people filming the video speaking in Mandarin too, so what does that prove? You still failed to show evidence that the man in gray t-shirt is a HKPF officer, yet you jumped to conclusions that PLA soldiers are in HKPF 2) Did he really said that "You deserved to be a soldier"? That means he wasn't a soldier and that he deserved to be one? But since you have no evidence that the man in gray shirt is HKPF then what's the point of this? 3) The gray t-shirt guy salute could have been a Taiwan Army soldier salute, or Singaporean Army Salute or who knows? And if his salute wasn't the British salute of HKPF, then are you saying the man in gray isn't a HKPF member?
    2
  11842.  @storage4539  Yes, Hong Kong Police Recruitment website clearly states that officers should be able to read and write Chinese and speak fluent Cantonese. Therefore, since the man in gray shirt didn't seem to be able to speak fluent Cantonese, then it's most likely he wasn't recruited by the HKPF. Then why are you claiming PLA soldiers joined the HKPF when you've presented zero evidence thus far?
    2
  11843.  @storage4539  "神州 Shenzhou The only standards we have in the discussion are officially from the US Justice Dept." Who are you to dictate which standards to use in this discussion? The fact remains that in Shenzhen, Cheng did not die, and there were 0 deaths by the HKPF during the 2019 Hong Kong riots, despite the violence perpetrated by the Hong Kong rioters, so isn't this an example of the restraint exhibited by the HKPF and how Hong Kong police aren't dehumanizing the protestors (since there were 0 deaths)? Whereas you can't say the same for African Americans that have died at the hands of U.S police like George Floyd, Ahmaud Abbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks. So you've agreed that you're dehumanizing the Shenzhen woman by not referring to her by name? And not once have you actually mentioned the African Americans who died at the hands of U.S police, so if anyone is dehumanizing anyone, it appears to be you, since you don't even seem bothered by the fact that George Floyd, Ahmaud Abery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks died, whereas Cheng did not, and there were 0 deaths by HKPF in 2019. You said: "The gray-shirt guy was not a HK policeman." That means your whole argument of "PLA solders disguised as HK police" has been disproven. What more needs to be said about whether he was a soldier or what he said, since the man in gray-shirt is not a HK policeman?
    2
  11844.  @storage4539  So since you agreed that I never mention police brutality then why are we talking about police brutality then? All I've mentioned is that there are 0 deaths by HKPF, that even in Shenzhen, Cheng survived, whereas you can't say the same for African Americans like George Floyd, Ahmaud Abery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks among others. What do you need a guideline for? What homework are you talking about? This is not school, this is real life. All this time, you've never actually bothered to mention the Shenzhen woman's name even once, it's almost as if you're the one dehumanizing her. Even the African Americans who died at the hands of U.S cops, not once did you actually refer to them by name, so if anyone appears to be dehumanizing people, it appears to be you, not the HKPF like you accused them of earlier. But you already stated that the grey-shirt guy is not a Hong Kong policeman in that video, so how can you claim he was disguised as a policeman? Was the grey-shirt guy in Hong Kong police uniform? Then your whole basis of PLA soldiers being disguised as Hong Kong Police has already been disproven, especially since you've agreed that the HKPF recruitment site listed being able to speak Cantonese as one of the requirements for signing on in the Hong Kong police, so how is the man in grey disguised as a Hong Kong policeman?
    2
  11845.  @storage4539  Well, what's wrong with only having facts, not judgement? The fact remains that there were 0 deaths by HKPF during 2019 Hong Kong riots, despite the violence by the protestors and even in Shenzhen, Cheng survived. Whereas you can't say the same for African Americans like George Floyd, Ahmaud Abbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks among others. Just simply laying down facts that's all, what homework are you talking about when this isn't school? I mean, you're claiming the HKPF are dehumanizing the Hong Kong protestors then why is it there were 0 deaths by HKPF during the 2019 Hong Kong protests? And you simply refused to mention the Shenzhen woman's name, nor the African Americans who died at the hands of U.S police, then isn't that dehumanizing them? How is the man in grey disguised as a Hong Kong policeman? The whole basis of your claim that PLA soldiers are disguised as HKPF is already dismantled given that he's not even disguised as a police officer in the video.
    2
  11846.  @storage4539  Again, I'm just pointing out the fact that there've been 0 deaths by the HKPF despite the violence by the Hong Kong protestors in 2019. Whereas you can't say the same for African Americans like George Floyd, Ahmaud Abery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks among others, at the hands of U.S police. It's just a statement, nothing more to it. Well, you first accused the HKPF of dehumanizing the protestors, yet there were 0 deaths by the HKPF in 2019. And I believe I've already elaborated the reason why you appear to be dehumanizing people by constantly referring to Cheng as the Shenzhen woman, instead of using her name. Even for the African Americans, you just called it "the American cases" instead of using their names. You said: "I think you don't know the meaning of the word disguise. It means taking on an identify from someone else. The grey-shirt is a PLA soldier." But how is the man in grey disguised as a Hong Kong policeman? How has he taken the identify of a HKPF when he's clearly not in uniform and is just wearing a grey shirt? Already this dismantles the whole argument of you claim that PLA soldiers are disguised as HKPF, even the Hong Kong police recruitment website clearly stated speaking fluent Cantonese is a requirement, like you agreed earlier.
    2
  11847.  @storage4539  The Hong Kong Police did exhibit incredibly restraint during the 2019 Hong Kong riots, despite the violence perpetrated by the protestors, that's why there were 0 deaths by the HKPF during 2019, whereas you can't say the same for George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks and other African Americans at the hands of American police. And you claimed that I made judgements such as treated them as humans, but you're the one who talked about dehumanising the HKPF. In fact, you're the one who brought up "police brutality" when I never talked about it. How would I know if the U.S policemen demonstrate a high level of discipline? I'm not here to discuss discipline, all I did was point out that there were 0 deaths by the HKPF during 2019, compared to the deaths of African Americans at the hands of U.S police. I never made any judgement of a high level of discipline for the U.S police, so what's the point of you bringing it up? I brought up George Floyd because his death was in 2020, during the same period as the 2019-2020 Hong Kong riots, yet you're bringing up events in 2014 (and even 1989) many years and decades ago? And the deaths under British colonial rule of Hong Kong is even earlier, because of the colonizers mindset over the colonized people. My counter argument to your claim that Hong Kong police were dehumanising thr protestors was to point out that there were 0 deaths by the HKPF during 2019 Hong Kong riots. And only now than you started using their names? All this time you've been calling her that Shenzhen woman and you refused to mention the African Americans names then it almost sounded like you were dehumanising them, that's my observation that's all. And I've been spelling Arbery correct all this time, what are you talking about? According to your definition, then simply insulting others like calling them expletives like the son of a female dog, is considered dehumanisation in your eyes? What about calling someone a cartoon bear like Winnie the Pooh for example? Is that considered dehumanising? And again, since we all know that the man in the grey shirt is not a Hong Kong Policeman, then why'd you jump to the conclusion that PLA soldiers are disguised as Hong Kong police? You even quoted Hong Kong Police recruitment website stating that Cantonese fluency is a requirement, so that already rules out the man in grey.
    2
  11848.  @storage4539  "神州 Shenzhou Your argument has been the HK Police showed "restraint" and "discipline"... Then how did you know the HK Police demonstrated a high level of discipline?" I did mention restraint but I never mentioned discipline. Did I ever said that the HKPF demonstrated a high level of discipline? All I said was that the HKPF did exhibit incredible restraint during the 2019 Hong Kong riots, that's why there was 0 deaths by the HKPF, whereas you can't say the same for George Floyd and the other African Americans. You said: "You didn't know the US cases you mentioned were not riots or protests, right? Also, please google how Ahmaud Arbery was killed and you may want to omit his case the next time." That makes it even more tragic given that deaths resulted from individual cases. Ahmaud Arbery was shot while jogging. You said: "The Shenzhen case is more relevant if you want to talk about police brutality of which you don't have the capacity to discuss." Again, I never mentioned police brutality, in fact it was you who brought it up, when I never talked about it. Even you agreed about it when you said: "神州 Shenzhou Yes, I agree that you never mention police brutality." And as for Ahmaud Abery, what difference does it make as long as people know who I'm referring to? I don't even understand your logic how is misspelling someone's name make them less human? It's not as though we are calling Jews "Rats" or Tutsi as "cockroaches". For example, the Ukrainian President Zelenskyy has many different spellings of his name like Zelensky or Zelenskiy on different media, but how's that equal to dehumanizing a person? You said: "You still don't understand the meaning of the word "disguise"." Since we all know that the man in the grey shirt is not a Hong Kong Policeman, then why'd you jump to the conclusion that PLA soldiers are disguised as Hong Kong police? You even quoted Hong Kong Police recruitment website stating that Cantonese fluency is a requirement, so that already rules out the man in grey. In fact I think the person who's really disguised here is you. You're pretending to praise PLA actions in 1989, while you're ever so reluctant to talk about U.S police killings of African Americans, then why continue this pretense?
    2
  11849.  @storage4539  Search my posts I never actually mentioned discipline, I did mention restraint, since there were 0 deaths by the HKPF despite the violence by the 2019 Hong Kong protesters. But you can't say the same for the African Americans like George Floyd, Ahmaud Abery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks. Did I ever made such a reply to Rosalynn Chow? There is no record of such a reply in my Internet archive, so why are you making stuff out of nowhere? As for the concept of "dehumanizing", clearly we are using Ahmaud Abery's name, even if misspelled. But you earlier you never actually referred to the Shenzhen woman by name in the first place, so it appears that you're dehumanizing her by not using her name that's all. I mean, didn't you say earlier that examples of dehumanizing is by calling the Jews "Rats" or Tutsi as "cockroaches"? Then how is misspelling Abery's name constitute dehumanizing when we are using a human name to refer to him, even if misspelled? So how is my argument ridiculous when your logic of dehumanizing is misspelling someone's name? You asked: "Huh, seriously? I have been saying these were unjust and illegal killings" You didn't really say that, you were contemplating whether they were unjust or illegal that's all, and you didn't really confirm it. You've actually barely talked about those cases. So why pretend that you're for the Communist Party of China, when all you do is talk about 1989 when there's an opportunity for you to condemn the African American killings? Why pretend that you support the PLA when it's apparent that you don't? This is what it means to be disguised. And again, since the man in grey is not even disguised as a HKPF, you're claim that PLA soldiers are disguised as HKPF doesn't even hold water. Joining the Hong Kong police force requires that one be fluent in Cantonese (like you quoted earlier) so how is the man in grey disguised as HKPF?
    2
  11850.  @storage4539  I searched the whole comment thread and I never posted such a comment to Rosalynn Chow, what are you talking about? I mentioned that the Hong Kong Police Force demonstrated restraint such that there were 0 deaths by HKPF but I never mentioned discipline. You said: "I think you are right that I didn't exactly use the words unjust and illegal on the US cases." It's like you're so quick to condemn HKPF, and also the Shenzhen police, but you're so reluctant to talk about the killings of African Americans by the American Police. Look at the number of times you bring up HKPF and Shenzhen police as compared to the U.S, and it's apparent that you're reluctant to talk about them. You said: "Am I reluctant to talk about US police killings of African Americans? Please confirm." Well, just look at the number of times you mentioned George Floyd and the other African Americans, compared to constantly talking about HKPF and the Shenzhen police case. You said: "So, on your great mind, not mentioning victims' names is dehumanizing." In a sense, by not doing so you're not treating the victims as human so it does fit into the logic. You said: "Meanwhile, continuously misspelling victims name is not." Even if misspelled, those are still human names and are clearly attempts to humanize the victims by using their name. You said: "Of course, I am for CCP. No CCP, no China!!" That's just you pretending. You're so reluctant to talk about the killings of African Americans, while talking about HKPF so why pretend that you're for the Communist Party of China (CPC)? You can't even use the correct acronym. And again, since the man in grey is not even disguised as a HKPF, you're claim that PLA soldiers are disguised as HKPF doesn't even hold water. Joining the Hong Kong police force requires that one be fluent in Cantonese (like you quoted earlier) so how is the man in grey disguised as HKPF?
    2
  11851.  @storage4539  I mentioned restraint but not discipline, and I've already admitted that the Hong Kong Police force demonstrated restraint as there are 0 deaths by the HKPF during the 2019 Hong Kong riots. Nowhere did I ever made any such comment to @Rosalynn Chow, you're just making things up that's all. Look at the number of times you bring up HKPF and Shenzhen police as compared to the U.S, and it's apparent that you're reluctant to talk about them. Here's a golden opportunity to denounce the killings of George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks, yet you are clearly reluctant to talk about them, instead you constantly draw attention to HKPF and even the Shenzhen police, so aren't you relunctant here? You said: "Please also explain why not mentioning victims' names constituents dehumanization." From Quora: Is it dehumanizing to refuse to say someone's name? Why or why not? Responses: "A persons name is their identity, the very first given to them from their parents or someone else who probably thought through the meaning and specialness of that name and the person before bestowing it on them. To refuse to/to disregard someone’s name, therefore, is like ignoring/disregarding their personhood. It is disrespectful." "Your name is your identity, Yes I believe it is dehumanizing if you refuse to utter the name of the individual. It also shows that you have no sympathy or empathy for the person." You said: "Of course, I am for CCP. No CCP, no China!!" You can't even get the name of the Communist Party of China (CPC) right. The name in Chinese is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) in which Zhōngguó (中国) means China and Gòngchǎndǎng (共产党) means Communist Party. So the correct name of the party is the Communist Party of China (CPC), not the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). So please stop pretending that you're for the CPC, you're reluctant to talk about the killings of African Americans, instead you rather bring up HKPF and the Shenzhen police. I can see through your disguise. And again, since the man in grey is not disguised as a Hong Kong police, then your claim that PLA soldiers are disguised as Hong Kong police doesn't hold water, given that one of the recruitment criteria is speaking fluent Cantonese (like you specified earlier). And can you prove that the man in grey is specifically a PLA soldier, not a Taiwan army soldier, Singapore army soldier, or some other soldier that also speaks Mandarin? And do you have evidence that the other Hong Kong policeman is a PLA soldier himself? Otherwise, the whole video is merely speculation on your part that PLA soldiers are disguised as Hong Kong police.
    2
  11852.  @storage4539  I followed your instructions, but the only result is from a website called: KZpost but that's clearly a different website, not YouTube so how does that even serve as evidence? You can't link to another website and claim that it's from YouTube when the URL is a different website altogether. Is there something wrong with quoting Quora? Your question was: "Please also explain why not mentioning victims' names constituents dehumanization." and so Quora has answered it as such. Your question is asking for an explanation so what has 5 out of 7 even got to do with it, since all you're asking for is an explanation on how not mentioning victim's names constitutes dehumanization? As for "your name is your identity" where does it say that misspelling the name constitutes dehumanizing? I'm still using their human name after all, even if misspelled. Whereas for a while you refused to use Cheng's name, you just keep calling her that Shenzhen woman that's all. You're reluctant to talk about the U.S police killings of African Americans (you barely even mentioned their names). I mean, if you're really "for the Communist Party" you had plenty of opportunity to denounce the U.S killings, yet you rather bring up Shenzhen police even though Cheng survived, so aren't you just pretending to be for the CPC? And twice, you misspelled CPC as CCP, when the name is clearly the Communist Party of China, so why continue this pretense that you're for the CPC when it's apparent that you aren't? You keep talking about disguises, then it appears that you're the one in disguise here and pretending to be what you are not. As for speaking Cantonese fluently, it's clearly written in the HKPF website that that's one of the requirements during recruitment. And since the man in grey is not disguised as a Hong Kong police, how can you claim PLA soldiers are disguised as Hong Kong Policemen? You can't even prove that the man in grey is a PLA soldier, not some other soldier that also speaks Mandarin, so your claim that PLA soldiers are disguised as Hong Kong policemen are all just speculation without proof.
    2
  11853.  @storage4539  Because it's clearly not the same website as YouTube. This KZ Post website you referred me to, how would I know if what it displayed was exactly the same as in YouTube? It's possible that the website was created to mimic the content on YouTube, but it doesn't mean that what is written there is what is written on YouTube. So if there's nothing wrong with using Quora, then I was merely using it to answer your question: "Please also explain why not mentioning victims' names constituents dehumanization." What has the majority of the answers on Quora even got to do with this? You asked for an explanation, and that's exactly what I offered; an explanation. Again, I still used Abery's name even if misspelled, so how is that dehumanizing? But the fact that for the longest time, you refused to even call that Shenzhen woman by her name, Cheng, is an example of you attempting to dehumanize her (as explained on Quora). Human names can be misspelled (take Zelenskyy for example, it has been spelled as Zelenskiy or Zelensky depending on different media). But it's still attempting to use the person's name, which you didn't. "1) On your mind, my continuous calling out of police brutality in the those cases you kept mentioning in the US means "reluctant" to talk about it?" I've already explained it, here's what I said: "Look at the number of times you bring up HKPF and Shenzhen police as compared to the U.S, and it's apparent that you're reluctant to talk about them." "Look at the number of times you bring up HKPF and Shenzhen police as compared to the U.S, and it's apparent that you're reluctant to talk about them." "2) On your mind, not speaking Cantonese disqualifies someone to fake a HK policeman." Because Hong Kong Police recruitment website clearly stated that one of the requirements for joining the force is to speak fluent Cantonese, so how is that man in grey disguised as a Hong Kong police? It's apparently you just jumping to conclusions that he's disguised as a policeman without proof. "3) You acknowledged that the gray shirt guy was a soldier, but you are uncertain of his allegiance." I never said that, I just said that you that the man in grey is a PLA soldier, not some other soldier that also speaks Mandarin. Again, please stop pretending that you actually support the Communist Party of China, when you've been using the incorrect acronym all this time. You're just pretending to be a CPC supporter that's all, so if talking about people being disguised, you would qualify. You asked: "Should we denounce police brutality, which includes unjust killings, regardless of country?" Once again, I never said anything about police brutality, it's you who brought it into the conversation. I merely pointed out that there had been 0 deaths by HKPF in 2019, and Cheng was alive, whereas you can't say the same for George Floyd and the others. You asked: "So on your mind, it is ok to condemn police brutality, including unjust killings, in the US, but it is not OK to condemn police brutality, including killings, in HK and China?" But we've made it clear that there were 0 deaths by HKPF during the 2019 Hong Kong riots, and even in Shenzhen, Cheng did not die isn't it? And again, I'm not talking about police brutality, it's you who've keep on trying to bring it up again and again.
    2
  11854.  @storage4539  You said it was done by third parties? Then how can you be sure if some third party didn't edit the comments to insert posts that weren't there before? Since this KZ Post is a different a website other than YouTube, it doesn't represent what was posted on YouTube, if third parties can create comments in them. "You are funny. It means your explanation is questionable, including netizens on Quora." But you asked for an explanation, and I gave it to you. Your question was (and I quote your previous words): "Please also explain why not mentioning victims' names constituents dehumanization." and I have explained exactly that. Your question has been answered with my explanation, so what has the majority of the questions in Quora even got to do with this, when your question has been answered? "Discussions are about making points, FYI. There are more points against than supporting your argument. It means your so-called "explanation" is not convincing." That's a discussion, but you just asked for an explanation why not mentioning victims' names constitutes dehumanization, and I have explained how it's dehumanizing not to use people's names. "One of the 5.5/7 counter arguments challenging your so-called "explanation":" They challenged it yes, but you asked for an explanation, which I have given to you. "Which sentence is the most important one? I think it is the first: "Your name is your identity." Therefore, you seem to have accepted the explanation, so I believe I have thus answered your question of: "Please also explain why not mentioning victims' names constituents dehumanization." "On your mind, why not uttering a name is not as severe as purposely misspelling a name and continuously denying a mistake?" I thought I have answered this before: because I am at least attempting to use that person's human name (even if misspelled) whereas not mentioning that person's name is in a sense dehumanizing (as I've explained many times) You said: "On your mind, my continuous calling out of police brutality in the those cases you kept mentioning in the US means "reluctant" to talk about it. Why?" Because you mentioned the Hong Kong Police Force and the Shenzhen Police far more than you mentioned U.S Police. "Arbery is Ukrainian? Last time I checked, he was AMERIAN." Did I ever said Arbery is Ukrainian? All I said was that Human names can be misspelled, using an Ukrainian name as an example. "You need to speak Cantonese to fake a policeman? You cannot fake a policeman if you don't speak Cantonese? Could you show me where you find it in the HK Police web site." How else are you going to fake a Hong Kong Policeman, if you can't speak Cantonese? You yourself said: "神州 Shenzhou "Language Proficiency Requirements...AND be able to read and write Chinese and speak fluent Cantonese." From the HK police recruitment site." "You and I are using VPN, which is illegal in China," Who said that VPN is illegal in China? There are many foreign companies that come to China and set up shop here, and may of them require access to Western websites like Facebook, Google, etc, so the government issue VPN license for these companies to operate in China. So how is VPN illegal in China? So please stop pretending to be what you are not. And talking about people being disguised, I've already explained that you would qualify as such. "How did Arbery die? How did the US police kill him? In HK, how many policemen were killed?" You claim you have VPN, then don't you already know the answers to all these questions yourself?
    2
  11855.  @storage4539  I've been answering your questions all this time, yet all you seem to do is ask more questions incessantly, without even bothering to answer questions of mine. Since your haven't given any proof, I take it you have no proof that the guy in grey is disguised as a Hong Kong Police Force. How is VPN illegal in China when people can use VPN providers that are approved by the government in China?
    2
  11856.  @storage4539  "神州 Shenzhou "then don't you already know the answers to all these questions yourself?" Are my answers yours too? Please confirm." What are your answers? You don't give me your answers, then how am I to confirm whether my answers are yours?
    2
  11857.  @storage4539  Because you asked for an explanation to your question: "Please also explain why not mentioning victims' names constituents dehumanization." Since you have repeatedly said "Your name is your identity." that means you've accepted the explanation, right? Then what more needs to be said? "There are overwhelming arguments countering his." But you asked for an explanation and that's exactly what I gave you. You never asked for arguments countering it, you just asked to explain why not mentioning victims' names constitutes dehumanization that's all. Since you've accepted "Your name is your identity" that means you've accepted this explanation. "Because you mentioned the Hong Kong Police Force and the Shenzhen Police far more than you mentioned U.S Police." I admired your imagination and lies." How am I lying when you clearly mentioned the HKPF and Shenzhen police far more than the U.S Police? "I also have said police brutality in HK and Shenzhen. Why you are reluctant to talk about it? Black lives matter to you, but Chinese lives don't matter to you. Why do you so racist against your own people? Are you ashamed of being Chinese?" I already said that there were 0 deaths by the HKPF during the 2019 Hong Kong protests, and even the Shenzhen woman, Cheng survived, so why are you accusing me of saying Chinese lives don't matter to me? "It seems quite frequent that you don't know what a rhetorical question is." All I'm asking is did I ever said Arbery is Ukrainian that's all. "Yes, human names can be misspelled," So again, how is that dehumanizing when I'm using his human name? "Yes, it is for a REAL policeman. Please show me the requirements for a FAKE policeman on the HK Police recruitment site. This Cantonese argument is laughable. First time I've ever heard someone needs to have a credential to fake something. Your logical thinking needs an improvement." Obviously if you want to fake a Hong Kong policeman, then the requirement is to speak Cantonese fluently otherwise how are you going to fake a Hong Kong Policeman? The logic is so simple, yet you're the one claiming my logical thinking needs an improvement? "But I am not a company and I don't have a company license like you." You've obvious never been to China, who said VPN is illegal in China? I mean, which person has been arrested just for login into YouTube while in China? You're just pretending to support the CPC (which you've used the wrong acronym earlier) so if anyone is disguised, it's you. "What is your definition of disguise and pretending? It's been a question unanswered by you for weeks." I've already use you as an example of disguise and pretending. And you never seem to answer my questions, yet you constantly demand answers out of me to yours? "Arbery wasn't killed by the police. You've been lying." He was. Arbery was killed by Gregory McMichael who worked as a Glynn County Police Department officer. "Another lie. You didn't spell Arbery correctly all this time." I did. And again, I've used his human name, so how is that dehumanizing? "I admire your comparison of "0 deaths by the HKPF" vs. 59 deaths and 51 deaths in 1956 and 1967 respectively." Thanks. First compliment out of you, since all you've done is insult me time and time again for my views. "It shows you didn't know the history when policemen and innocent citizens were among the death numbers you proudly presented here." I never said that policemen and innocent citizens were among the death numbers, all I'm doing I pointing out the death tolls that's all. "Why you lied about the numbers?" Which numbers did I lie about? "There was a riot in 1981 and 0 deaths." Well, that's good news then. It shows that Hong Kong riots were progressing towards better restraint from 1967 (51 deaths) to 1956 (59 deaths) to 1981 (0 deaths) and 2019 (0 deaths) "Per your genius logic, is it a testament to how far the HKPF has come since BEFORE the 1997 handover, and demonstrates the incredible restraint exhibited by the HKPF?" I never said that there weren't other riots before the 1997 handover, so why are you making such a mountain out of a molehill?
    2
  11858.  @storage4539  My post is there, it's just that YouTube doesn't allow me to share links about Tiananmen Square massacre being a myth.
    2
  11859.  @storage4539  According to Jay Mathews, reporter for The Washington Post, as far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square and all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully.
    2
  11860.  @mhow4967  Yes, no one can change the skin colour that we were born with. If Hong Kongers look themselves in the mirror, they will see what the rest of the world sees, a Chinese person. Even if they adopt Anglo Saxon culture inside them, it just means that they are a like banana (white inside, but yellow outside).
    2
  11861. The Kubuqi desert solar power plant doesn't use solar panels, instead it uses mirrors to focus the Sun's rays to heat up the top of the tower containing molten salt, which then heats up steam to drive turbines and generate electricity.
    2
  11862.  @Carbuncle0168  Liziqi's channel has the Guinness World Record for "The most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube" at more than 2.4 billion views[a] and 16 million subscribers, as verified on 21 August 2021.
    2
  11863. @Sheriff Lobo "especially those that die in collapsed buildings" Reminds me of the tragic Miami Building collapse video:youtu.be/kKG5f0tAuM0
    2
  11864. @Sheriff Lobo China literally built more skyscrapers in the world than any other. According to Skyscraper Center Countries by number of 150m+ buildings 1. China (2,569) 2. United States (839) 3. United Arab Emirates (305) 4. Japan (268) 5. South Korea (266) ... Source: Skyscraper Center
    2
  11865. +stan wong True. In fact, Singapore has been ruled by authoritarian single party PAP for its entire nation life for more than 50 years.
    2
  11866.  @112313  Agreed. Australia is ostensibly an anti-Asian hotspot and while not all Australians hold anti-Asian sentiments, Scott Morrison adopts the same anti-China stance as USA. Even though Australia is located closer to Asia than America and China is Australia's biggest trading partner. It's sad that this anti-China sentiment has spilled over to affect South East Asians in Australia as well as Asian Australians.
    2
  11867. Funny how China gets accused of being aggressive just for building roads at our side of the border. Meanwhile, India's Border Roads Organization has 18 projects along the border with China.
    2
  11868. One is looking for new partners (China) while the other is looking for new puppets (USA).
    2
  11869.  @patricksmith1626  Why do you want Chinese people to remove the Communist Party of China? The CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China?
    2
  11870. Tide Pods Why you keep on repeating the same point that I can't deny that ROC has its own government, military, etc? When did I ever denied such a thing? Could you quote me the exact words I used, claiming that I deny ROC having its own government, military and democracy?
    2
  11871. Huawei's HiSilicon chip design unit has overtaken Qualcomm and shipped more smartphone semiconductors in China than Qualcomm in the first quarter of 2020 for the first time ever, according to a new research report. Source: Huawei's chip unit overtakes Qualcomm as China's top semiconductor player for the first time cnbc.com/2020/04/29/huawei-reportedly-overtakes-qualcomm-as-chinas-top-semiconductor-player.html The unit, known as HiSilicon, shipped 22.21 million smartphone processors in the first quarter of 2020, roughly in line with the number shipped in the same period last year, according to a new report by China-based CINNO Research. Huawei's HiSilicon managed to increase its market share to 43.9%, from 24.3% in the first quarter of 2019.
    2
  11872. China will not use nuclear weapons first, unless we are first attacked with nuclear weapons, according to No First Use policy regarding nuclear weapons.
    2
  11873.  @vegahimsa3057  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    2
  11874.  @vectorsky6523  You're Indian but you obviously don't care about Chinese people, that's why you continue to propagate rumors that the coronavirus started in wet market in Wuhan, even when it's long disproven. Source: Coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, Chinese scientists say scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3051981/coronavirus-did-not-originate-wuhan-seafood-market-chinese Analysis of genomic data from 93 samples of the novel coronavirus suggests it was imported from elsewhere.
    2
  11875. +Nick Sanfilippo He is refering to Baizuo 白左 or "White Left"
    2
  11876.  @brexitgreens  "神州 Shenzhou Can't compare China to Russia." I'm not comparing them country to country. I'm suggesting that since Cyrus is aware of Western anti-China propaganda, painting China in a bad light, he should also be aware of Western anti-Russian propaganda doing the same for Russia. Cyrus has broken through the anti-China propaganda, but has he done the same for the anti-Russian propaganda? It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling russophobic and sinophobic sentiments in the West against Russia and China. And it's having the effect of pushing both countries closer together than we've ever been, and the China-Russia relationship is rock solid.
    2
  11877.  @jaimemartinez9792  Since the Communist Party of China has done an excellent job transforming China from a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure, then why can't majority of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China?
    2
  11878.  @jaimemartinez9792  So those rich officials became rich because of Capitalism, then why can't China follow more Communistic principles of allocating and redistributing wealth to the poorer regions? Like the Eastern China became rich because of ports and trading, the Communist Party of China is now spreading that development to Western China (Tibet, Xinjiang, etc) through the Belt and Road Initiative. And the Great Chinese Famine was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Chairman Mao Zedong can't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he'll wish for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    2
  11879.  @jaimemartinez9792  China did not stole Japanese high speed train technology, Japanese companies agreed to transfer technology as part of the terms of setting up shop here in China. China paid money to purchase the technology and now you're accusing China of stealing hi-speed rail technology? Did I ever said that Chinese invented hi-speed rail? China's economy is a mix of state-owned and non-state owned companies. Huawei for example, is not a state-owned company and is entirely employee-owned. But the Chinese government is what controls the corporations from getting out of hand. For example, capitalism favors monopolies like how Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon dominate their respective industries and eliminated competition from smaller American businesses. Whereas in China, there are anti-monopoly laws to clamp down on anti-competitive practices in the industry, even Jack Ma of Alibaba is being investigated under anti-monopoly law.
    2
  11880.  @jaimemartinez9792  Nobody point a gun and force foreign companies to transfer technologies, if they don't want to, they are always welcome to pack their bags and take their business elsewhere outside of China. But when they legally agreed to transfer technology as part of the terms of setting up shop here in China, how's that considered stealing? I mean, do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions like _Paper, Printing, Compass and Gunpowder? _ And China's current economy is a mix of state-owned and non-state owned companies, so why did you claim all companies are state-owned when that is simply not the case?
    2
  11881. A recent survey for kids showed: Chinese kids' dream: Astronaut American kids' dream: YouTuber Source: American Kids Want to Be YouTube Stars While Chinese Kids Want to be Astronauts, Survey Shows nextshark.com/survey-youtube-stars-astronauts/
    2
  11882. Yes. The feelings of Americans today at the thought of the USA in decline, is probably akin to what Chinese people felt back then during the fall of Qing Dynasty China.
    2
  11883.  Danny Johnson  The Americans absorbed Nazi propaganda apparatus after Germany's WWII surrender and applied Joseph Goebbels propaganda apparatus to "demonise" the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Even today, American propaganda is so much more effective than Chinese propaganda, because hardly anyone believes Chinese propaganda, whereas many Westerners believe American anti-China propaganda.
    2
  11884.  Asx Aaszx  The US CDC tested America's blood samples dating back to Dec 13th 2019, and detected the presence of Covid-19 antibodies in their blood. This implies Covid-19 was present in America much earlier than the Wuhan outbreak, in order for antibodies to be developed. Source: COVID-19 may have been spreading in the US at least a month before first case was reported, CDC study says usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/12/01/covid-cdc-study-says-virus-us-weeks-before-first-case-reported/6475864002/
    2
  11885. @Dio Y Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    2
  11886. Even the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  11887. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  11888. @Pat Heung You said: "@Ahsun C The comments on here appear to be still up. Well, they appear to me." This is the first comment you posted on this thread. You'll need to log out of your account and return to this comment thread in order to see whether your earlier comments are posted or not. Alternatively, you could concurrently open a separate different web browser (i.e Firefox, Chrome, Microsoft Edge, etc) and return to this page without logging in to see if your comments appear or not.
    2
  11889.  @Shadowless_Kick  You said: "Watch this more complete video and let me if you still think it’s my imagination or not." It's clearly your imagination all right. You can literally write fiction and weave stories to turn a simple scene into a sinister plot.
    2
  11890.  @Shadowless_Kick  You said: "meaning that Xi asked the two men to pressure Hu to leave without first asking Hu if he wanted to leave or not" I watched the video (link:youtu.be/h5Z-r_7FCXM ) and when Xi talked to the younger of the two men (presumably Hu's grandson), Hu Jintao was also listening in on the conversation between Xi and the young man. If Xi had told the young man to escort Hu to leave, Hu Jintao would have objected upon hearing this conversation, but he didn't. You said: "And you can see in the video that Hu did not want to leave even after the aided came to pressure him to leave." While there was some initial reluctance, Hu Jintao briefly tapped Xi's shoulder and said something, to which Xi responded by nodding his head. Hu did the same with Li Keqiang, who also nodded in response, so it's most likely something that the three of them agreed upon. Afterwards, Hu was escorted away without putting up any trouble. You said: "I am just telling you the consensus of majority of overseas Chinese," Do you have evidence that the majority of overseas Chinese came to such a consensus?
    2
  11891.  @Shadowless_Kick  Whatever President Xi said to the young man is clearly within earshot of Hu Jintao. And yet Hu did not object even after hearing this conversation. Also, if you claim Hu knew how to control himself in front of the delegates, then why'd he insist on taking that white paper in front of them? Hu Jintao briefly tapped Xi's shoulder and said something, to which Xi responded by nodding his head. Hu did the same with Li Keqiang, who also nodded in response, so it's most likely something that the three of them agreed upon. Afterwards, Hu was escorted away without putting up any trouble. I can read overseas Chinese media websites, but that only represents the Chinese who posted comments. There are overseas Chinese that do not post comments on websites, then how can you claim that the majority of overseas Chinese criticize and condemn what Xi did to Hu?
    2
  11892.  @Shadowless_Kick  Comments cannot be taken as actual polls, they only represent those people who posted comments, while those who didn't aren't taken into account. Furthermore, a single person can make multiple accounts to post the same critical comment, so measuring public opinion by comments is inaccurate to say the least. Yet you're telling me that the majority of overseas Chinese came to such a consensus, through comments?
    2
  11893.  @Shadowless_Kick  The fact that one person can open multiple accounts proves that using comments as a gauge of public opinion is entirely inaccurate. Because there could be many people that feel nothing is wrong, so they don't feel compelled to comment unlike those who do feel the need to comment. So your claim that the majority of overseas Chinese came to such a consensus lacks evidence.
    2
  11894.  @Shadowless_Kick  There are over 40.3 million overseas Chinese, how can you claim that a majority of them come to a such consensus about Hu being escorted out due to political reasons, based off comments alone? We've already run through how Internet users can make multiple accounts to post the same comment, then it already shows that your method of counting them is flawed.
    2
  11895.  @bill4056  Agreed, but it's still kinda tedious to leave and return. What I usually do is to open two separate windows from two separate browsers (i.e Firefox & Chrome). I'll use Firefox to post my YouTube comment, and then switch to Chrome (while signed out of YouTube), refreshing to check if my Firefox comment can be seen by everyone.
    2
  11896. Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    2
  11897. If animal testing is forbidden, then how are scientists going to test out effects of new drugs? Directly on people?
    2
  11898.  @item6931  Not even Chinese basketballer Yao Ming? He was born in Shanghai and is quite famous even in the West.
    2
  11899.  @okismokipoki  You said: "If you take womd out of the discussion russian military would get plowed by NATO in less then a week." Is that why some 100 foreign mercenaries were killed in a NATO training facility located in Yavoriv, Ukraine, near the border with Poland by 30 Russian missiles? The NATO facility couldn't even detect those incoming Russian missile, and hundreds of mercenaries perished as a result of their negligence. (Wait a minute, what's a NATO training facility doing inside Ukraine in the first place, if Ukraine was not a NATO members?)
    2
  11900.  @okismokipoki  Didn't you read about how 30 Russian missiles slammed into a NATO military training facility in Yavoriv, Ukraine and killing hundreds of foreign mercenaries? If NATO was that advanced, then why didn't they see the Russian missiles coming?
    2
  11901. China already controls Inner Mongolia, so Mongolians may fear complete assimilation back into China, if war between Russia and China break out.
    2
  11902. + Kal Kungyab If Tibet supposedly has a case for independence, then why do UN countries like USA, Russia, UK, France, etc, all accept Chinese sovereignty over Tibet? Nobody ever raises issue of Tibetan sovereignty at all during all those UN summit. Even today, the Rohigya refugee crisis affecting Myanmar is of greater interest to UN countries, than Tibetan's independence isn't it?
    2
  11903.  @creditcard3466  "Have you seen any Asian culture that we adopt in England?" Hey, wasn't Tea invented in China, and don't you British love your tea like Americans do their coffee?
    2
  11904.  @FAILkipedia  Where's the actual footage of Russian mobile crematoriums then?
    2
  11905.  @FAILkipedia  So you're just going to jump to conclusions without actual evidence? Why would Russia ask the UN Security Council for an inquiry into Buca if they were supposedly behind it them?
    2
  11906.  @FAILkipedia  Russia has more powerful cluster missiles, why'd would they use the Soviet era Tochka-U? And the missile was launched from Ukrainian-controlled territory into Kramatorsk.
    2
  11907.  @EStepan0v  Indeed. After Nazi Germany surrendered at the end of WWII, the Americans absorbed Germany technology. Like the German Airforce (Luftwaffe) had such successful aircraft designs, that the Allies copied it. Even Nazi V2-Rocket scientists were put to work on NASA's moon landing missions. It probably goes without saying that Goebbel's propaganda apparatus was dismantled in Germany and used by Americans to craft anti-Communist propaganda during the Cold War (and now against China and Russia). That's probably why American propaganda is so effective, because they learned their techniques from Goebbels's propaganda machine.
    2
  11908.  @fclopez1  You said: "The totalitarian dictatorship in the PRC was imposed on the mainland people by the CCP at the end of a gun." So why did ROC 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to PRC 🇨🇳 had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. That should already demonstrate KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, as well as demonstrate Chinese mainlanders choosing CPC over KMT. What more needs to be said?
    2
  11909.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "without term limits, the leadership power will be subject to abuse." Look at German Chancellor Angela Merkel and she's been in power for 16 years whereas Chinese President Xi Jinping has only been in power for 8 years since 2013, yet hardly anyone is complaining about Merkel's lack of term limits, yet so many Westerners are complaining about Xi's? Why the biased double standards here towards China?
    2
  11910.  @noobacegamer6255  You said: "This still does not answer my question" Question? I looked up your previous posts and there was no question mark (?) so did you ask any question? You said: "We chose to not use our country’s name" Because you can't, because Taiwan is part of China and the athletes from Taiwan in the Olympics have to compete under the name "Chinese Taipei". Because Taiwan is an inseparable part of China, as even written on Taiwan's constitution itself.
    2
  11911.  @christopherhamlin6139  "神州 Shenzhou The name of the tribunal is clearly stated in my previous post." This is what you wrote: " Specifically, On 12 July 2016, an independent arbitral tribunal established under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) published a clear and binding ruling on China’s claims vis-à-vis the South China Sea. " But where is the name of this arbitral tribunal and are you sure it is a legitimate UN-agency?
    2
  11912.  @christopherhamlin6139  After doing some research, it turns out that the name of the "independent arbitral tribunal" that did the 2016 ruling is the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA). But the PCA is itself not an official UN agency, turns out that it only rents the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) but the two organizations are not related. Source: SCMP: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal Since the tribunal ruling was by PCA, a non-UN agency, then how can you claim that it's ruling is endorsed by the United Nations?
    2
  11913.  @christopherhamlin6139  Did you check out North Vietnam PM Pham van Dong's 1958 diplomatic letter to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai where he acknowledged that the Spraty and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese? The diplomatic note is available for viewing on Wikipedia. In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. Source: Wikipedia: File:1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai
    2
  11914.  @christopherhamlin6139  The United Nations clarified on its Chinese microblog yesterday that the tribunal that ruled against China’s historic claims over the disputed South China Sea was not a UN agency. The statement came amid apparent public misunderstanding of the tribunal’s operations. The UN said the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, which issued the decision on the case on Tuesday, operated out of the same building, the Peace Palace, as the UN’s primary justice branch, the International Court of Justice, but the two agencies were unrelated. ... Source: SCMP: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal Since the tribunal ruling was by PCA, a non-UN agency, then how can you claim that it's ruling is endorsed by the UN?
    2
  11915.  @christopherhamlin6139  The content of Pham Van Dong's 1958 diplomatic note to Premier Zhou Enlai is as follows: "Comrade Prime Minister, We have the honour to bring to your knowledge that the Government of the DRVN recognizes and supports the declaration dated 4th September, 1958 of the Government of the PRC fixing the width of the Chinese territorial waters. The Government of the DRVN respects this decision and will give instructions to its State bodies to respect the 12-mile width of the territorial waters of China in all their relations in the maritime field with the PRC. I address to you, comrade Prime Minister, the assurance of my distinguished consideration". Source: Wikipedia: File:1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai So North Vietnam PM Pham had acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were within Chinese territorial waters, in the 1958 diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou.
    2
  11916.  @christopherhamlin6139  "神州 Shenzhou If you were writing a thesis then your research would be much better." But I explicitly stated that I'm not writing one. I just quoted North Vietnam PM Pham Van Dong's diplomatic letter to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai acknowleding that Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese. Whereas you didn't even know that that the independent arbitral tribunal that ruled on the South China Sea isn't even an official UN agency.
    2
  11917.  @christopherhamlin6139  You asked: "Who was Ho Chi Minh and what did he say about China." He was the founding father of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and he formed the Việt Minh to fight for Vietnam's independence from the French, during the First Indochina War. During the First Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons, ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla force with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help Vietnam fight for independence. From 1950 to 1954 the Chinese government shipped goods, materials, and medicine worth $46 billion (in 2021 dollars) to Vietnam. From 1950 to 1956 the Chinese government shipped 155,000 small arms, 58 million rounds of ammunition, 4,630 artillery pieces, 1,080,000 artillery shells, 840,000 hand grenades, 1,400,000 uniforms, 1,200 vehicles, 14,000 tons of food, and 26,000 tons of fuel to Vietnam. ... Source: Wikipedia: First Indochina War If anything, Ho Chih Minh should be grateful for the Chinese aid given to Vietnam to help them fight for independence from the French.
    2
  11918.  @christopherhamlin6139  You don't even bother to do research yourself. I mean, you didn't even know that the "independent arbitral tribunal" that made the 2016 ruling on the South China Sea isn't even an official UN agency and the UN has stressed that while the Permanent Court of Arbitration shares the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice, the two organizations are unrelated. Yet you're claiming that the UN endorsed the ruling when it wasn't so?
    2
  11919.  @christopherhamlin6139  I've already shown that China provided a wealth of aid ranging from weapons, ammo, artillery pieces and shells, explosives to food, fuel and everything needed to the Viet Minh forces to help them fight for independence. If anything, Ho Chih Minh literally owes China a debt that they can never repay. And China never even bothered once to send Vietnam the bill for the amount of aid provided.
    2
  11920.  @andrenogueira5058  "神州 Shenzhou The UN said: "China, pack up and get out of the South China sea!" When did the UN ever said that? The independent arbitral tribunal that did the 2016 ruling on the South China Sea is not even an official UN agency, the Permanent Court of Arbitration only shares the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice, but the two organizations are not related. Source: SCMP: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal
    2
  11921.  @andrenogueira5058  Malaysia didn't even claim the South China Sea. In 2011, former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad stated that China was not a threat to anyone and was not worried about aggression from China.
    2
  11922.  @andrenogueira5058  The United Nations clarified on its Chinese microblog that the tribunal that ruled against China’s historic claims over the disputed South China Sea was not a UN agency. The statement came amid apparent public misunderstanding of the tribunal’s operations. The UN said the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, which issued the decision on the case on Tuesday, operated out of the same building, the Peace Palace, as the UN’s primary justice branch, the International Court of Justice, but the two agencies were unrelated. ... Source: SCMP: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal So how can you claim "神州 Shenzhou The UN said: "China, pack up and get out of the South China sea!"
    2
  11923.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "One letter is not enough - neither is a map from centuries ago." Who do you think you are to determine what is enough and what isn't? I've already shown that China actually opened the Paracel Islands to tourism for vacationers to go diving and windsurfing, and even get married at the church on one of the islands. Sansha City on Woody Island, the biggest of the Paracels, is home to a community of 1,500 residents complete with a school, a police station and a court. Then what more proof do you require? Also, what map from centuries ago are you talking about? The diplomatic letter is dated to 1958, that's less than 100 years ago, isn't it? You said: "International law is. International courts' rulings are. " But it wasn't the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that did the arbitral tribunal ruling , it was the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) that did the ruling. And the United Nations has clarified that the PCA is not an official UN agency, unlike the ICJ, the two only share the same office space in the Hague that's all, but they are unrelated.
    2
  11924.  @andrenogueira5058  "The point is: China unlawfully took over territory which is not its and further militarized it, threatening and attacking by-passers while it plundering someone else's resources." China controls twelve islands in the South China Sea, whereas Vietnam occupies twenty-one islands on which it has built runways, piers, barracks, storage tanks, and gun emplacements. Malaysia and the Philippines have five and nine sites respectively, occupied by naval detachments. All have built runways capable of launching military aircraft, yet you just accuse China of militarizing the region? ... Source: Insider: The South China Sea will be the battleground of the future
    2
  11925.  @andrenogueira5058  "You got me curious: what did the the mirror say?" You're the one claiming: "神州 Shenzhou The UN said: "China, pack up and get out of the South China sea!" but I have already shown that the UN clarified on its Chinese microblog that the tribunal that ruled against China’s historic claims over the disputed South China Sea was not a UN agency. The statement came amid apparent public misunderstanding of the tribunal’s operations. The UN said the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, which issued the decision on the case on Tuesday, operated out of the same building, the Peace Palace, as the UN’s primary justice branch, the International Court of Justice, but the two agencies were unrelated. ... Source: SCMP: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal But it's apparent that you cannot refute this point, you just pretend to speak on behalf of the UN that's all, without citing anything to substantiate your claim. Even the 1958 diplomatic letter between Vietnam PM Pham and Chinese Premier Zhou, you can't even refute it, so you just dismiss it that's all.
    2
  11926.  @andrenogueira5058  "1. Do all Chinese tourists carry guns and operate missiles?" Since Pham van Dong has acknowledged in his 1958 diplomatic letter to Zhou Enlai that the Spratly and Paracel Islands are Chinese territory, then can't China deploy missiles to territory that we control in the Paracel Islands? Vietnam occupies twenty-one islands in the South China Sea, on which it has built runways, piers, barracks, storage tanks, and gun emplacements. Malaysia and the Philippines have five and nine sites respectively, occupied by naval detachments. All have built runways capable of launching military aircraft, yet you just accuse China of militarizing the region? ... Source: Insider: The South China Sea will be the battleground of the future
    2
  11927.  @andrenogueira5058  "2. Why are Chinese tourist sinking fishing vessels? Is it the way they entertain themselves?" Which fishing vessel has been sunk by Chinese? On the other hand, a Vietnamese fishing vessel (QNG90617) had been fishing illegally in waters near the Paracel Islands and had refused to leave after repeated warnings from the Chinese coastguard, instead it rammed into the Chinese coastguard ship. Not only Vietnam, but the Phillippines coastguard patrol boat (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) shot to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng (洪石成). But which Vietnamese/Philippine fishing vessel been shot by Chinese coastguard? Answer: None! You said: "3. What about plundering the seas? Is it a competition to see who can destroy most fish at a faster pace?" Now you're resorting to "what-aboutism"? China isn't destroying fish just for the sake of it, the fish caught are used to feed our enormous population of 1.4 billion people. In fact, China has imposed an annual fishing ban in the South China Sea since 1999, as part of our efforts to promote sustainable marine fishery development and improve marine ecology, giving the fish a period to recover. Not even Philippines nor Vietnam have imposed such a fishing ban in the South China Sea, unlike China. You said: "4. What about under-sea mining? is it a complementary activity with full-board or you pay extra?" More what-aboutism from you? If China has the capacity to mine the deep-sea for rare earth metals, then can China do that? China is responsible for around 80-90% of rare earth metal production in the world, which are used in many technologies like batteries, DVDs, LEDs, solar cells, wind turbines, lasers, etc.
    2
  11928.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "check out the horizon, I'm arriving on that carrier coming from the South." The "carrier-killers" of the People's Liberation Army Rocket Force will be there to greet you. China has inducted the world's first operational anti-ship ballistic missile, known as the DongFeng-21D. The missile is launched from a land-based mobile launcher and has a maximum range exceeding 1,450 km, so it's able to hit a target (such as an aircraft carrier) out there in the sea from long range. The DF-21D has an onboard guidance and navigation system that enables it to maneuver to avoid U.S anti-missile defenses located below and is even capable of terminal guidance, allowing last-minute small adjustments to its trajectory just seconds before impact. There's a video illustrating China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile on YouTube, that you can check out. You said: "Welcome to the new era: brute-force - Chinese's reason." You're the one claiming to visit the South China Sea islands in a carrier here, then aren't you the one employing brute force here? You said: "Farewell panda style, we are now officially a gorilla." The U.S does exhibit some of the simian behavior you described, given that they keep on sending warships to the South China Sea.
    2
  11929.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "the military bases built up by other nations were built as a defense from/reaction to the Chinese aggressive military built up." If you follow the timeline, other nations had already built airstrips (capable of launching military aircraft) much earlier than the People's Republic of China. For example, Vietnam built its airstrip on Spratly Island in 1976, making this the first runway in the Spratly island group. In 1978, the Philippines incorporated Thitu Island after airstrip construction had already begun. In 1983, Malaysia built an airstrip atop Swallow Reef. The Nationalist Chinese government 🇹🇼 occupied Itu Aba in 1946, but did not begin constructing its airstrip until 2006, and construction finished in 2008. Mainland China 🇨🇳 is the most recent Spratly claimant to build an airstrip, which it began on Fiery Cross Reef in late 2014. ... Source: Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative: Air power in the South China Sea If anything, mainland China is actually a late-comer to building airstrips in the South China Sea, and even Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia, etc, built airstrips earlier than China. Yet the West kept silent about other nations building bases, but makes noise when it comes to China? You said: "That is what "peaceful China" achieved: the militarization of a former de-militarized region of the globe." See the timeline I described above, it turns out Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia, etc had built airstrips capable of launching military aircraft in the South China Sea long before the late-comer, mainland China made any such moves of our own. You said: "And more: Vietnam and the Philippines do not sink Chinese fishing vessels while China does sink foreigner vessels." Again, I'm asking you which fishing vessel have been sunk by the Chinese? I literally shown that the Phillippines coastguard patrol boat (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) open fired and shot to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng (洪石成), but has Chinese coastguard shot to death any Vietnamese or Filipino fisherman? Answer: None!
    2
  11930.  @andrenogueira5058  "In addition, the Spratly islands are much closer to the Philippines and Brunei: they weren't Vietnamese to start with, so those letters mean absolutely nothing - as the arbitrary UN court ruling supported." The Spratly Islands weren't part of the Philippines either as per the 1898 Treaty of Paris that Spain signed with America. Look up the Map of the Treaty Limits of the Phillippines by ResearchGate and the Spanish and Americans drew up Philippines territorial boundaries which did not include the Spratly Islands as within Philippine territory. The Philippines, on the basis of historic right of title, claims that its territorial sea extends to the limits set forth in the colonial treaties, which define the extent of the archipelago at the time it was ceded from Spain to the U.S. in 1898. The line drawn around the archipelago marks the outer limits of the historic territorial seas of the Philippines, which will be referred to here as the Philippine Treaty Limits. ... Source: The Treaty Limits of the Philippines - ResearchGate So of course the Spratly weren't Vietnamese to begin with (according to Vietnam PM Pham Van Dong's diplomatic letter) neither was it Phillippines territory (according to the 1898 Treaty of Paris). Also, what arbitrary UN court ruling are you talking about? The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is not an official UN agency, it only shares the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) but the two organizations are not related. ... Source: SCMP: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal
    2
  11931. Chinese people greatly admire Indian's treatment and worship of animals such as dogs and cows. In India, cow's lives more valuable than people's lives and it is acceptable defend cows from other people and to kill these people in the name of animals. Animal life much more important than human life in India, so Indians must protect them at all costs. 😂😂😂 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/29/modi-condemns-rise-mob-violence-beef-eaters-india Chinese people would rather live as animal in India, than as lowly human in China. That's why India forever number one in the world.
    2
  11932.  @command_unit7792  This Western fetish for Asian women is sometimes called "Yellow Fever" and the stereotype has been seemingly propagated by historical Hollywood videos often portraying Asian women as prostitutes or damsels in distress needing rescue by Western male leads.
    2
  11933. Chinese make up 20% of the world's population after all. Yet many Hollywood flicks lacks Asian representation, and Asian actors (Chinese, Japanese, Koreans) often get casted into clichéd roles like martial artist, triad thugs, nerdy but socially inept guy, hackers etc. Asian actresses are often casted as damsels in distress (to be saved by white male lead) or prostitutes, massage parlor workers, and other sexualised roles. Then there's 'white-washing' where characters of Asian descent are played by white actors. Hopefully, China's influence on Hollywood will shift their target demographics and possibly help grant more roles to aspiring Asian actors/actresses.
    2
  11934.  @huluqi3972  Not everything is measured in black and white. Chinese believe in attaining a balance of opposing forces. For example, the Yin-Yang symbol (☯) has a small black dot in the white, and also a small white dot in the black.
    2
  11935. Also, international law acknowledges armed resistance against the occupying power.
    2
  11936. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  11937.  @johnvalor6198  It was also featured in a report entitled: Peace For Ukraine published by Brave New Europe authored by former UN Secretary General. On March 28, Putin, as a sign of goodwill and in support of the peace negotiations, declared readiness to withdraw troops from the Kharkov area and the Kiev area; this apparently occurred even before his public announcement. ... (Source: Brave New Europe: Peace For Ukraine)
    2
  11938.  @HK-zf7op  Russia has made repeated calls for an impartial UN investigation into the massacre that happened on that village on the outskirts of Kiev.
    2
  11939.  @HK-zf7op  You said: "I doubt you have ever been to Russia or Ukraine and if you think Russian troops havn't committed atrocities then I cant help a fool." Have you ever been to Russia or Ukraine yourself, before calling others a fool? The Katyn massacre was by the former Soviet Union and Russia today is no longer the Soviet Union of the past. Malaysia Airline MH17 was shot down over Ukrainian territory, why are you pinning the blame on Russia?
    2
  11940. MsSuperFerry But you clearly said "Being poor in the West is earning ten times as much per day, at least in my country." so aren't you implying that being poor in the West is being rich in China and India? Those are your words after all. The British not only ruled violently over the Indians, but during that time, they also wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but had nothing of interest to offer China, so they waged two bloody wars with China (sometimes, using conscripted Indian troops against China) and forced Chinese people to buy opium from them, which we didn't want, because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to spread the addiction throughout rest of China, and Hong Kong was made into British colony as a result. Since when did India embraced socialism/communism/maoism (except for small groups of insurgents)? As for China, under President Xi Jinping, the government is now following a ideology of "socialism with Chinese characteristics". Although China is embracing Western capitalism, China should follow our own political path to success instead of just blindly copying Western form of government.
    2
  11941.  @larrythao1414  Hong Kong government is elected by the people of Hong Kong and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections. The Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam won the 2017 election garnering 700 votes out of the 1200-member Election Committee (which consists entirely of Hong Kong groups) and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections.
    2
  11942.  @larrythao1414  "神州 Shenzhou wrong. The deal during the handover is that china promises to stay out of hongkong's election until 2047." And China has honored the agreement. After all, Beijing doesn't cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections, Hong Kong's votes are all cast by the people of Hong Kong themselves, so what are you talking about? Name me an instance where Beijing interfered in Hong Kong's elections, you tell me.
    2
  11943.  @Andrew-ib7gs  Hong Kong government is elected by the people of Hong Kong, Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections, all votes casted are by the people of Hong Kong themselves. If there is a small circle elections where the legislative is always pro-Beijing, then what's wrong with these businesses and tycoons being pro-Beijing and voting in favour of the mainland? Hong Kong is a democracy, they choose their leaders themselves so what's wrong when they choose a pro-Beijing candidate?
    2
  11944.  @Andrew-ib7gs  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA. The test is given every three years to 15-year-olds around the world and measures their knowledge in reading, science and mathematics. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    2
  11945.  @larrythao1414  The definition of "Democracy" is when people get to participate in elections and vote their leaders into power. Beijing merely appoints the Hong Kong Chief Executive (as per Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45) but like I said Beijing doesn't get to choose which candidate gets elected in the end, neither does Beijing cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections and its the Hong Kong votes that elect their leaders. Therefore Hong Kong clearly fits the definition of a democracy, since the Hong Kong people cast votes to elect their leaders.
    2
  11946.  @Andrew-ib7gs  Previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under the authoritarian rule of colonial Britain, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong while it was a British colony. It's only during the period of Hong Kong's handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    2
  11947.  @larrythao1414  Yes, they got denied to run, but again the definition of democracy is that the people participate in elections to vote for their leaders and Hong Kong is clearly a democracy, since all Hong Kong votes were cast by the people of Hong Kong, and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections. So how is Hong Kong not a democracy, when their leaders are voted in by their own people? It's normal in a democracy that candidates get disqualified, like if a candidate runs out of money, or doesn't fit the criteria (e.g too young to run for elections) so Hong Kong is clearly a democracy, since the people of Hong Kong voted for their leaders.
    2
  11948.  @larrythao1414  There are three constitutional qualifications that a US president must meet: be at least 35 years old, be a natural-born citizen of the U.S., and have lived in the U.S. for at least 14 years. If a nominee is found to not meet all three of these qualifications, he or she is disqualified from being president, and their nomination must be rescinded. So USA have their criteria, Hong Kong has their own criteria. But since USA and HK hold elections where the people elect their leaders, then both USA and HK fit the definition of democracy. What's the definition of democracy? That the people get to vote for their leaders and since Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections, then Hong Kong fits the definition of democracy.
    2
  11949.  @Andrew-ib7gs  If you really lived in Hong Kong for over 30 years, then you realised that Hong Kong actually held more elections AFTER the 1997 handover, than they ever did for 150 years as a British colony! Isn't it thanks to mainland China that the people of Hong Kong finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before?
    2
  11950.  @Andrew-ib7gs  About President Xi Jinping being premier for life, China has put forth numerous 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's direction and future in 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans through till completion. Whereas in the United States for example, the U.S presidents have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only make short-term plans for America's future, instead of making long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more.
    2
  11951.  @larrythao1414  The 4 candidates did not met requirements, some were separatists pushing for Hong Kong independence, so they were eventually disqualified. Countries should have strict requirements for presidents, otherwise someone like Donald Trump can just waltz into the White House and wreak havoc for the next few years. But again, "democracy" means that the people elect their own leaders and since Beijing doesn't cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections, then Hong Kong clearly fits the definition of a democracy isn't it?
    2
  11952.  @asphyxia4135  India's Global Hunger Index is lower than Pakistan and even below North Korea. Source: India falls to 102 in hunger index, 8 ranks below Pakistan timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/india-falls-to-102-in-hunger-index-8-ranks-below-pakistan/articleshow/71606116.cms
    2
  11953.  @creddesignmatters6855  You asked: "But who adjudicates on ‘how able’ you are, and who decides what your needs?" Let's use China's poverty alleviation as an example. In the below video, communist party members visit the rural areas, keep track of poor families, monitor income levels, conduct local meetings to vote and listen to poor people's complaints, and then brainstorm ideas to lift them out of poverty. Who is poor and who is no longer poor is decided by their neighbours (they probably know best) and other villagers democratically through voting. Video: China's war on poverty youtu.be/nuaJGPZCBYU It may not be the best system, but its a democratically way to decide who's poor and who isn't.
    2
  11954.  @creddesignmatters6855  Chinese universities produce the most STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) out of any other country in the world. Countries With The Most STEM Graduates 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/02/02/the-countries-with-the-most-stem-graduates-infographic/ This implies that China is going to play a much larger role in the STEM fields, given the sheer number of graduates produced in these fields.
    2
  11955.  @rykellim  Lol, I would like to see if this new President Trump 2.0 will be able to complete his/her predecessor's campaign promise to build a wall at the US-Mexico border. Or maybe if President 3.0 will. America today is suffering from what's called 'political stagnation' whereas believe it or not, China's modern political system has undergone many changes in just a century. China was once 'democratic' when Dr. Sun Yatsen overthrew the Qing dynasty and established Republic of China from 1912-1949. But during this period, China was in chaos, we lost control of Tibet and China was divided into various provinces ruled by warlords. Even the Japanese attacked China during this weak period in our history, and in the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realizing a unified China. Next, China tried 'communism' under Mao Zedong and Mao succeeded in unifying China (where the previous administration failed to achieve, even after 37 years!) and proclaimed People's Republic of China in 1949. But while Mao was excellent tactician, he was a poor governor and his disastrous policies eventually lead to Mao making self-criticism and stepping down as state chairman. In 1970s, Deng Xiaoping introduced 'capitalist' reforms when it turned out that communist market system wasn't working and with the reforms, China's economy grew rapidly. But with economic prosperity came pressure to adopt Western democracy, which Deng felt China wasn't ready for yet, so he ordered the People's Liberation Army to quell the protests of 1989. In the end, Deng went to his grave without ever admitting to the events of 1989. Currently, China is pursuing "socialism with Chinese characteristics" under President Xi Jinping, and its still too early to know if it will be successful or not. But I have shown that China's political system has seen much change in just under a century. All of the above mentioned Chinese leaders had/have some vision of China in which they wanted to achieve, and all of them are/were fiercely patriotic to China. But in contrast, US appears to be undergoing "political stagnation" where there is increased scapegoating (blaming China for America's woes) and victimization (claiming America is victim of Chinese trade) and so on. Frequent change of leaders does not always mean that its for the better and instead the leaders may reverse each other's policies.
    2
  11956. China is helping Philippines by supplying weapons free of charge to Philippines authorities to help them with anti-drug abuse operations and also to combat the radical extremists hiding out in their islands.
    2
  11957. This Cambodian kid knows multiple languages like English, French, Mandarin, etc, but the other countries all seemingly ignored him, except for Chinese government deciding to sponsor his education in China.
    2
  11958.  @buddha199115  About racism in India, I remember the tragic case of the murder of Nido Taniam in 2014. He was a 20-year old student from Arunachal Pradesh, so while he was an Indian national, physically he has East Asian features. He was beaten to death in a brawl in New Delhi, presumably just because he looked Chinese, and even Time Magazine featured a story on him.
    2
  11959.  @neil6958  What harm has democracy done? What good has democracy done that you think China should abandon our political system and adopt Western liberal democracy? China's political system has shown to be viable for our country, so why should China switch to liberal democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    2
  11960.  @neil6958  What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationthailand.com/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    2
  11961.  @neil6958  About Innovation in China, China is world's most populous country, so statistically speaking, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    2
  11962.  @neil6958  China publishes more scientific research papers than any other country in the world. For the first time, China has overtaken the United States in terms of the total number of science publications, according to statistics compiled by the US National Science Foundation (NSF). Source: China declared world’s largest producer of scientific articles nature.com/articles/d41586-018-00927-4 The agency’s report, released on 18 January, documents the United States’ increasing competition from China and other developing countries that are stepping up their investments in science and technology.
    2
  11963.  @neil6958  If you want to talk about prison populations, then it's actually America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate
    2
  11964.  @tomspencer1364  But Dr Li Wenliang was spreading rumours about the coronavirus being SARS (which is clearly untrue, Covid-19 is not SARS). And at that time, it's too early to determine whether the coronavirus is related to SARS, there needs to be medical work to investigate the coronavirus, to arrive at designation of SARS-2. Another thing is that had Dr Li Wenliang didn't want to spread the information. In his private WeChat group, he wrote "Don't circulate the information outside of this group, tell your family and loved ones to take precautions." (大家不要外传，让家人亲人注意防范)
    2
  11965.  @tomspencer1364  China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    2
  11966.  @tomspencer1364  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    2
  11967.  @tomspencer1364  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    2
  11968.  @tomspencer1364  And Deng Xiaoping is a Communist party member, so isn't China's success brought up under the leadership of the Communist Party of China? But why are many Westerners ever so reluctant to give credit to the CPC where credit is due?
    2
  11969.  @tomspencer1364  China's political system has been through immense change. China once tried democracy when Dr. Sun yatsen (Sun Zhongshan) overthrew the Qing Dynasty China in 1911 and established the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949). But back then China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. Next, China tried communism under Mao Zedong and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today. But Mao was an excellent strategist, not a good governor and that led to China's failed economic policies. Next China tried Socialism with Chinese Characteristics under Deng Xiaoping which successfully transformed China from a dirt-poor country into an economic juggernaut today. But with economic reform comes political pressure, and it was Deng who ordered the People's Liberation Army into Tiananmen Square. Deng died without ever admitting to sending the PLA to Tiananmen Square. Today, China is following Xi Jinping Thought under President Xi Jinping, and its still too early to tell what's going to happen. The thing is, China's political system is constantly evolving with the times, whereas in USA, the U.S constitution has remained unchanged for 150 years.
    2
  11970.  @tomspencer1364  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. Through it all, China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    2
  11971.  @tomspencer1364  So since China under authoritarian rule, has successfully controlled the Covid-19 crisis (far better than many Western democracies) then what's wrong with letting the Communist Party remaining in power in China? So-called "bottom up rule" can be destructive as well, because ordinary people are fickle and they make poor voters for several reasons: -Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (i.e. They may not turn up to vote, or they submit blank votes) -Ordinary people may base their vote on emotions, not logic (i.e. Many British don't like immigrants, so majority voted for Brexit) -Ordinary people are susceptible to foreign influences (i.e. Russian interference in US elections) -Ordinary people may simply lack awareness of the country's real political situation, to make informed decisions regarding the country's future. There's a host of other problems associated with democracy, so why not let those who know how to govern, govern? That's what China is doing and look at how successful China is.
    2
  11972. Nobody thought Donald Trump would even get a single term as US President, but look where he is today? Prior to Trump's election, Obama even said: "At least I will go down as President" and now he has to eat his own words.
    2
  11973. Much of South Korea's progress occurred under the dictator Park Chung Hee, so why is "democracy" even needed. Even Taiwan spent most of its life under single-party authoritarian KMT rule, and progressed rapidly under it so why implement "democracy" for its own sake? Only in 2016 did an opposition party (DPP) took over from KMT, but look at Taiwan's economy being in a slump because of that.
    2
  11974. Well said. The choice whether the conflict continues or not, rests on Zelenskyy's shoulders, not Putin's or Biden's. But Zelenskyy want's to use Ukrainians as a meat shield and prolong the conflict to maximise loss of lives.
    2
  11975.  @zetristan4525  "Bhutan (as presented here) represents the spirit and modest governance for happy living and citizens' wellbeing." Since the 1960s, the Bhutanese military have expelled over 100,000 Bhutanese of Nepali origins (around 40% of Bhutan's population at the time). No Bhutanese refugees have been allowed to return to Bhutan despite negotiations taking place. Sounds like the Bhutanese government only supports the well being of a certain percentage of its population that's all.
    2
  11976. Chinese government and workers rushed to built a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised. Video: Huoshenshan: the hospital built in 10 days in China over coronavirus outbreak youtu.be/l2QfufpwfdY Kudos to the Chinese construction workers who worked hard to build those hospitals. China also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. Video: Time-lapse video shows how Leishenshan hospital completed in 12 days youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk
    2
  11977.  @naniy7736  China notified the WHO of a strange new virus in 31st Dec 2019 and there were no indication of human-to-human transmission back in 2019. The first human-to-human transmission case in China was confirmed only on 20th Jan 2020 and that's when the government began implementing quarantine measures shortly after. Source: China confirms human-to-human transmission of coronavirus theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/20/coronavirus-spreads-to-beijing-as-china-confirms-new-cases (Dated to 20th Jan 2020)
    2
  11978. Western culture: Individual's interests at the expense of the community's interests Chinese culture: Community's interests at the expense of the individual's interests.
    2
  11979. @The button man Be prepared to answer your peers' questions like "Why on Earth would you want to move to China of all places?"
    2
  11980. @The button man 你的中文很好。
    2
  11981. ​ @Andy-P  "Be disgusted all you like." France itself had re-education camps (look it up) if you want to be disgusted, shouldn't you be with something that actually happened in France, rather than a potential action that has not happened in Taiwan island? You said: "The UN went to Xinjiang but not allowed free access." In her statement, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Michelle Bachelet was able to visit Kashgar prison and the Kashgar Experimental School, a former vocational training center, among other places, so what makes you think she was not allowed free access?
    2
  11982.  @Andy-P  You said: "Considering the hundreds of camps and hundred of thousands of Uighurs been to them." Do you actually have solid evidence that there were hundreds of camps and hundred of thousands of Uighurs been to them? Also since you've acknowledged that France had re-education camps, then why are you disgusted with China?
    2
  11983.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou It's the scale of the Chinese camps. Shenzhou and what happens in them. The UN have just released a report." Nowhere in the UN Human Rights Council report is there any mention of the "scale of the Chinese camps" so could you point me to where it mentions the scale? Much of the report is just "allegations or risks" instead of evidence.
    2
  11984.  George Haskas  China is the world's 3rd country to independently send people into space, after USA and USSR. In 2008, China conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut (Chinese astronaut) exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft and ventured into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtube.com/watch?v=9PAkbT4kTpI&t=280 This makes China the 3rd country in the world to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space. China is also the first Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, India, etc, have not conducted manned space missions of their own thus far.
    2
  11985. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  11986.  @educateyourself3872  "far better than putting your trust in the US”. It’s right above in the comments." That's "putting your trust in the US" so it's you putting your trust in the US. You specifically said I said they "trusted the US" then why can't you quote me the exact words I wrote, saying that they "trusted the US"?
    2
  11987.  @educateyourself3872  "putting your trust in someone or something is extremely close to trusting someone." But it is not the same words. You clearly said I said that they "trusted the US" yet you cannot quote me my exact words, it's all based off your own interpretation of my words. And you're accusing me of changing my words when you can't even quote me my original words.
    2
  11988. Surely even Trump Corporation is fair game right? Let's force Trump to choose between his country or his business. After all, its only 4-8 years as US president, while his business is his life outside of politics.
    2
  11989.  @yct3369  While Communism is not strictly Chinese culture, Karl Marx's ideology does share similarities with Confucius' belief of Datong (大同 "The Great Unity") where people did not only love their own parents and children, but others as well. People also secured the living of the elderly until their ends, let the adults be of use to the society, and helped the young grow. Those who were widowed, orphaned, childless, handicapped and diseased were all taken care of. People disliked seeing resources being wasted but did not seek to possess them; they wanted to exert their strength but did not do it for their own benefit. In short, the Chinese Great Unity concept shares many similarities with communist ideals of Marxist-Leninism.
    2
  11990. The Kubuqi desert solar power plant uses mirrors not solar panels. The mirrors focus the Sun's rays (like a magnifying glass) to heat up the top of the tower containing molten salt to thousands of degrees Celsius which is then used to generate power. Molten salt is used because it can absorb and retain heat energy for a long time. Even after the Sun sets, the molten salt heated throughout the day is still able to produce electricity even at night.
    2
  11991. Besides Osama, USA also invades countries in Middle East and cut off their heads (Muamar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, etc) and then install US puppets to replace them.
    2
  11992.  RYAN SEACREST  The United States also stole German patents after WWII. At the start of WWII, American tanks were largely inferior to German tanks, but after Nazi surrender, the Americans absorbed German Tank (Panzer) technology and that's why American tanks are powerful today. The German Airforce (Luftwaffe) had such successful designs that the Americans incorporated them into their aircraft. Even Nazi V2 Rocket Scientists were put to work on NASA Moon landing missions. Source: One of the greatest ripoffs of all time was the US theft of German patents after WWII wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/patents.html
    2
  11993.  @bruceplenderleith838  "神州 Shenzhou do you have evidence that it wasn't?" I did not make the assertion that it wasn't moved, you're the one asserting that the rocket part was moved, then why should I provide evidence that it wasn't moved? The lack of scotch marks could be explained since the Tochka-U has a cluster munitions warhead, meaning that it explodes in the air and scatters shrapnel above a region. That also explains the lack of craters since this is a missile, not an artillery shell. The rocket part is also smoking hot when it was filmed, so6how'd do you move it while it was still hot? It also looks quite heavy and might need some heavy lifting to move.
    2
  11994.  @bruceplenderleith838  So you have no evidence that the rocket was moved? Then we both agree that the direction it's pointing helps determine its point of origin. The direction that the rocket is pointing is northeast, which suggests that the missile may have arrived from the southwest, which is the direction of Ukrainian controlled territory such as Dobropillia. So it's possible that this attack on Kramatorsk was orchestrated by Ukrainian forces themselves.
    2
  11995. The West needs an off-ramp in Ukraine, instead they continue climbing the escalation ladder.
    2
  11996. China's approach to dealing with Covid is to sacrifice business to save lives. The United State's approach to dealing with Covid is to sacrifice lives to save businesses.
    2
  11997. Nabium Then what about Breaking Bad ? Of course every country has good shows and bad shows, but if shows like Transformers very popular, because they feature Hong Kong, then why can't Chinese people enjoy what we want? What is the big deal with you? Every country has its own censorship laws but what makes you think Chinese people can't watch videos that we are determined to watch? As you said, other countries have their own censorship laws too. The relation between Chinese people and Peking Man was made by a Westerner (as I have quoted) so why am I wrong for quoting him? Why don't you quote sources of your own then, if you want to counter my point? What's it got to do if China's opening up is only economic? No one says every country has to open up if we don't want to. Don't you have Chinese tourists and students visiting your countries? Why are you claiming China doesn't open up then?
    2
  11998. Hali Where in my posts did I talk about how many people around the world want to live in China?
    2
  11999. Nabium I have shown that countries all have their own degree of censorship, whether its USA, UK, Canada, etc. Even your country has censorship laws in place against hardcore porn, so why are you blaming China's censorship, just because it is to larger degree than yours? Guam is part of US territory, but the people aren't allowed to vote for Presidential Elections, similar to other US territories like Puerto Rico. So I have at least shown that the US Press Freedom Index is "incomplete" in the sense that not all of US media in all its territories are taken into account. You said previously that "the whole of the Norwegian people, chose to censor porn." but how do you know that? Do 100% of the Norwegian people choose to censor porn, or is it the majority only? If its only the majority, then why do you claim the whole of Norway choose to do so? Also, you said previously that: " Transformers and the Walking Dead are not going to open anyone's eyes about other cultures. " But USA has this "Zombie Apocalypse" obsession, evident in their shows, movies, video games and Halloween costumes, so why is The Walking Dead series not introducing China to American culture? Similarly, Transformers is about giant robotic aliens, common in Japanese "mech" culture, so why is it not introducing Chinese to Japanese "mech" culture? Where is your logic here? Before claiming "刘晓波 died in jail", you said: "Your government is imprisoning and even killing people with differing opinions." so why did you make that earlier statement then? Your sources about Falun Gong Organ Harvesting is mostly speculation without actual evidence. China performs about 10,000 organ transplants but people like Ethan Gutmann just grossly exaggerates the figure from 10,000 to 100,000? And you just believe what he says without proof? "We are looking at not 10,000 transplants per year in China, but something more like 60,000 to 100,000 transplants a year in China." - Ethan Gutmann According to the following source, the estimated number of organ transplants worldwide in 2015 was about 126,670 so you mean China suddenly has the capability to perform 100,000 transplants by ourselves? Where do we get all the doctors to perform a number of transplants almost equal to that of the rest of the world? Source: Estimated number of organ transplants worldwide in 2015 statista.com/statistics/398645/global-estimation-of-organ-transplantations/ Why don't you step back from your biased view of China, and take a look at the figures carefully?
    2
  12000. ARVIN How are the people of China absolutely isolated from the rest of the world? Don't you see so many Chinese tourists in your countries? What about Chinese international students studying in your universities? You mean the whole world is defined by the Internet alone, and also You tube, which is just a video-sharing website? You tube does not represent the entire world now doesn't it? I still stand by my original statement that "China is not altogether isolated, or disconnected from the rest of the world. World events have shaped China, and so has China shaped world events similarly."
    2
  12001.  @kammonkam4905  So if your claim is that China under-reported, that there are more Covid deaths than what's being reported, then all the more there is this need for lockdown in Shanghai. Can you imagine how much worst the situation would be if Shanghai did not implement lockdown, and just let the virus spread rampantly and claim more elderly lives?
    2
  12002.  @kammonkam4905  So if according to you, the number of cases in Shanghai is greater than what's being reported, then it further reinforces the need for Shanghai to take necessary to prevent unnecessary deaths isn't it? Your argument is basically in favor Shanghai's need for lockdown, if you claim that there are more deaths than what's being reported. "On the other hand, the unnecessary strain on the medical system, the deaths and desperation caused by the siege and the inhumanity and social harm of subjecting 26 million people to prolong imprisonment is clear." It would be a far worst strain on the medical system if Shanghai had not implemented lockdown, and just allowed the virus to spread uncontrollably and overwhelm the medical system. Just look at Hong Kong's medical system getting swamped, and so you're basically arguing in favor of the need for Shanghai to take necessary precautions including lockdown.
    2
  12003.  @kammonkam4905  1) I'm calling it a lockdown, you're calling it siege, when nobody is starving (according to Cyrus' guest, Frank Tsai) so what siege are you talking about? And can you imagine how much worst it would be if Shanghai had not implemented lockdown at all? "What do you based that on?? !!" How many times do I have to repeat it? Didn't you read my last paragraph? Just look at Hong Kong's medical system getting swamped.
    2
  12004. Joe Biden is going to have his work cut out for him, in reunifying a divided America. Over 70 million Americans voted for Trump.
    2
  12005.  @Tenchinu  As Chinese myself, I personally found many Hollywood movies to be severely lacking in Asian actors. Asian actors (Chinese,Japanese, Koreans) are simply underrepresented in Hollywood, often casted into cliche roles like martial artist, triad thug, nerdy but social inept guy, hacker, etc. Asian actresses often get roles as damsel in distress (to be saved by Caucasian male lead) or prostitutes, dragon ladies, massage parlor workers, other sexualized roles etc. Also, there's also "white-washing" of Asian characters, that is, the casting of Caucasian actor/actress to portray a character of Asian descent on film. Hopefully, China's influence on Hollywood will shift its target demographic and grant more prominent roles to aspiring Asian actors/actresses.
    2
  12006. laowhy clearly said that the property is in his wife's name, then why is laowhy doing the paperwork in China, while his wife is in America? He complains incessantly about how difficult it is for foreigners to get stuff done in China, then why don't he let his wife do the paperwork instead?
    2
  12007.  @jane29jeng  New York actually got their cases from Europe, not Asia. New research indicates that the coronavirus began to circulate in the New York area by mid-February, weeks before the first confirmed case, and that travelers brought in the virus mainly from Europe, not Asia. “The majority is clearly European,” said Harm van Bakel, a geneticist at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, who co-wrote a study awaiting peer review. Source: Most New York Coronavirus Cases Came From Europe, Genomes Show nytimes.com/2020/04/08/science/new-york-coronavirus-cases-europe-genomes.html A separate team at N.Y.U. Grossman School of Medicine came to strikingly similar conclusions, despite studying a different group of cases. Both teams analyzed genomes from coronaviruses taken from New Yorkers starting in mid-March.
    2
  12008.  @tingli3403  Hong Kong was once a thriving port city under British rule, while mainland China was still dirt poor at that time. Today however, times have changed and Hong Kong has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan and is facing increasing competition from upcoming mainland cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian, etc. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage And this is inspite of mainland cities being under authoritarian CCP rule, and Hong Kong being under their own democratic government rule. No wonder why the Hong Kong people feel like they're being left behind, as mainland cities start surpassing Hong Kong.
    2
  12009.  @dedoshucos  China applies for more patents than any other country in the world and we also have the world's largest number of granted patents, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators. Patent applications for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (1,542,002 patents) 2. United States (597,141 patents) 3. Japan (313,567 patents) 4. South Korea (209,992 patents) 5. European Patent Office (174,397 patents) 6. Germany (67,898 patents) ... Source: World Intellectual Property Indicators wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Indicators#Patents Patent grants for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (432,147 patents) 2. United States (307,759 patents) 3. Japan (194,525 patents) 4. European Patent Office (127,603 patents) 5. South Korea (119,012 patents) 6. Russian Federation (35,774 patents) ...
    2
  12010. More people in Taiwan need to wake up and realize that USA doesn't really care about Taiwan democracy, as long as they can use Taiwan as a chesspiece to contain the mainland's rise that's all. The U.S abandonment of Afghanistan and NATO's refusal to put boots on the ground to defend Ukraine should sound alarm bells that Taiwan might face the same abandonment by USA if conflict breaks out between Taiwan and the mainland.
    2
  12011. She is the modern "Helen of Troy" except that it's her visit that launched a thousand warships, certainly not her face
    2
  12012.  @aungyelin959  Zheng He was Hui Muslim.
    2
  12013.  @WeCube1898  What genocide? China's population in the 1950s was around 500 million, but has since tripled in size to 1.4 billion people today, making China the world's most populous country.
    2
  12014.  @tengteng4076  So you look down on farmers? They till the land to provide food to feed people, yet you look down on this occupation?
    2
  12015.  @tengteng4076  The Mongols used Chinese Character Yuan元 to denote Yuan Dynasty so how's it not Chinese? Just like the Manchu's use Chinese Character Qing清 to denote Qing Dynasty. They didn't call the Yuan Dynasty and Qing Dynasty as Mongol Empire or Manchu Empire, they adopted Han Chinese culture and they proclaimed themselves Emperors of China. So you admitted earlier that China had not colonized a single country that means you consider those territory as part of China. Based on your earlier words.
    2
  12016.  @tengteng4076  Video: China never invade nor colonize other countries or territories. Martin Jacques 中国从不入侵也从不殖民 youtu.be/XDX8nQIEhJY
    2
  12017.  @tengteng4076  You've been demanding answers out of me to your questions, but you refuse to answer any questions of mine, then why should I answer your question?
    2
  12018.  @tengteng4076  I mean, you yourself admitted earlier that China had not colonized a single country (those are your earlier words) so it's clear that you don't consider those places as countries, then we are certainly in agreement in this regard.
    2
  12019.  @laser-tv2jq  The same applies to United States as a country of many states, then why can't the comparison be made between U.S and China only?
    2
  12020.  @tomaszzap9574  The history of Russia begins with the histories of the East Slavs. The traditional start date of specifically Russian history is the establishment of the Rus' state in the north in 862, ruled by Varangians. So Russia's history is at least more than a thousand years old.
    2
  12021.  @edwardcano8936  No one knows what the future brings, but one thing's for sure: the current US-dominated unipolar world is unfair, it favors only a few select countries, at the expense of the global majority. Russia and China would at least provide balance, such as an alternative viewpoint. I mean, nobody says that the US has to be on top all the time. Why not give other countries a chance to shine on the world stage?
    2
  12022. "Madness is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results" - said a famous German.
    2
  12023.  @nathanremix5800  If the land belonged to Malay not Chinese, then why did Malaysia give up its land to form independent sovereign country Singapore? It's the Malay's folly to do such a thing.
    2
  12024.  @raven2dove  The Taiwan authorities said they were not informed of Pelosi's visit prior to her announcement, what makes you think they invited her? Also, Taiwan island was not included as one of the destinations on Pelosi's itinerary, she just basically sneaked into Taiwan.
    2
  12025.  @johnround8311  Seems like the whole ordeal is concluding soon. Meng is finally released and put on the first flight back to China, while Huawei pays a fine. And as for the 2 Michaels, Spavor is convicted of espionage and sentenced to 11 years imprisonment, while Korvig is similarly being charged with espionage. The whole ordeal appears to be reaching it's conclusion soon.
    2
  12026.  @tkam9  Hey, why isn't your comment being shown on my screen?
    2
  12027.  @zilun  But if say if he didn't finish his 2nd term? And even if he did, its not impossible for US presidents to reverse previous president's policies. For example, Barack Obama had the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) deal, which had been in the works for 8 years, yet it was cancelled by President Trump when he took office, because Trump don't like Obama (Obama humiliated Trump with his birth cert)
    2
  12028. 为什么西方人对中国有如此偏见？
    2
  12029.  @suppeeps5393  If you're talking about prison populations, then it's actually the United States that's home to the world's largest prison incarceration rate, and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back onto the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons.
    2
  12030. Hong Kong is dependent on mainland China for electricity and Hong Kong imports 23% of its total electricity needs from the mainland's electrical grid. Source: Wikipedia: Electricity sector in Hong Kong: Interconnection with China wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_Hong_Kong#Interconnection_with_China
    2
  12031.  @mayureshnaik2257  Tibet is part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Tibet broke free of China in 1913 but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951 so why should China release our ancestral lands? Hong Kong was taken from China by the British. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    2
  12032. @Zinclead 49 Sikkim referendum was held when Indian Army troops were occupying Sikkim so obvious Sikkim was pressured to vote to become part of India. Source: 16th May 1975: The Kingdom of Sikkim and its Annexation with India eurasiantimes.com/sikkim-history-india-annexed/ Goa, Manipur and Nagaland were integral part of India, then why can't China claim Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, Hong Kong, etc as integral part of our country? Why abuse vulgarities against me for my views, just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    2
  12033.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Mao's insistence on maintaining high grain export quotas in the face of clear evidence of poor crop output during the great leap forward were responsible for the famine." The local provincial governments had grossly inflated the crop yield that they reported to Mao Zedong, making it seem as though the harvest was good. Mao Zedong even personally visited those fields, but the local governments had workers transfer stalks of grain from dying fields to healthy fields before Mao walked by, giving off the impression that there was going to be a bumper harvest. That's why Mao Zedong thought there was surplus grain to export to other countries in exchange for machinery imports.
    2
  12034.  @MarkYeung1  How could Mao Zedong have known the true situation of the famine when the local provincial governments grossly inflated their crop yield in their reports to Mao? They kept on over-reporting their crop harvests to Mao, that's why Mao believed there was surplus grain to export. Even when Mao Zedong himself personally visited those fields, the local officials had workers transfer stalks of grain from dying fields to healthy fields in order to give Mao the illusion of a bumper harvest.
    2
  12035.  @MarkYeung1  The Great Chinese Famine was caused by bad weather conditions like floods which destroyed crops and resulted in poor harvest. The 1958 Yellow River Flood coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops, and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. Even Mao Zedong couldn't have the power to control the weather.
    2
  12036.  @lisa.e5776  "Mao, and he and his wife had been executed by CPC for what had been done." Actually, Mao Zedong's body has been preserved at the mausoleum in Tiananmen Square. The memorial hall today remains a popular destination in Beijing, and is often visited by foreign dignitaries and communist party officials. On 29 Sept 2019, President Xi Jinping along with other politburo members visited the mausoleum. The venue opens at 7 am in the morning and public members line up since 5 am to pay their respects to the founding father of the People's Republic of China.
    2
  12037.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Yang claims that local party officials were indifferent to the large number of people dying around them, as their primary concern was the delivery of grain," There you go, straight from the horse's mouth. It's clearly the local provincial governments that were indifferent to the famine, that's why they grossly inflated crop figures to Mao and focused on delivering grain even though their fields were dying. That's why Mao Zedong thought there was surplus grain in order to export to pay back debts to USSR. Mao did not open the state granaries because the reports by the local party officials indicate that there was surplus grain. Also the term "Mao's slaughter" is disingenuous since those people starved to death because of famine yet it's being classified as slaughter?
    2
  12038.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Mao clearly knew the status of the starvation. Yet he refused foreign aid, which led to more deaths." According to A Study of China's Great Famine by Wei Xiong, Princeton University, grain imports increased dramatically from 66.3 thousand tons in 1960 to 5.81 million tons in 1961, and that's after Mao became informed of the famine in 1961. The high level of net grain imports continued in the following five years, so it's quite possible that Mao did not know the true extent of the famine (i.e because the local party officials over reported the crop figures) and that once it was known, Mao Zedong began importing grain. The article also cites that local officials who had better knowledge of the famine did not report accurately to Mao. After the Xinyang Accident broke out in late 1960, Mao asked his colleagues to visit different regions of the country to collect information about the famine. Mao even asked his security guards to visit their home villages and report back to him what they saw there. This indicates that Mao might have been concerned that his colleagues were not telling him the truth, and he had to rely on his personal guards as trusted informants.
    2
  12039.  @MarkYeung1  There's no denying that the 1958 Yellow River Flood coincided with the Great Leap Forward. In July 1958, the peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 cubic metre per second with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kilogram per cubic metre which is 14x and 24x their mean annual values, respectively. How is this not unusual when those values are 10 times higher than normal?
    2
  12040.  @MarkYeung1  The flood affected regions destroyed crop harvests that were meant to be exported to other regions of China. In addition to the 1958 Yellow River flood, northern parts of China were experiencing drought. In 1959, drought caused significant crop failures in Shaanxi (where output declined by more than 50 percent) and Hubei (where it fell by 25 percent). The following year Shanxi, Hebei, Shandong and Henan provinces suffered prolonged droughts, their production falling by more than half. China’s southern and coastal provinces also endured 11 major typhoons. In 1961 the northern provinces again suffered months of drought, while those in the south endured more flooding. ... (Source: Alpha History: The Great Chinese Famine) Also, Hong Kong literally imports most of its food from mainland China, yet you're claiming that many people in Guangdong area had to escape to Hong Kong?
    2
  12041.  @MarkYeung1  Even Yang claims that local party officials were to blame, since they were grossly inflate the crop yield in their reports to Mao. And Mao wasn't exporting grain for fun, he's doing it to repay the debt to the Soviet Union, and since the reports indicated surplus grain, that's why Mao decided to export the grain. Thus, the evidence indicates that Mao was uninformed of the true state of the famine until later. According to the A Study of China's Great Famine by Wei Xiong, Princeton University, the grain imports increased dramatically in 1961, that's must be when Mao Zedong finally learned about the true state of the famine. Originally, the Great Leap Forward was supposed to last 5 years, yet it was cut short to 4 years (1958-1962) because Mao finally learned that the local officials had over reported the crop yield from his security guards that were sent to visit different regions to collect information. The article also found it difficult to establish the premise that Mao could accept the loss of the lives of millions of people as a cost of the GLF. First, different from Stalin, peasants were the constituent base of Mao. Repeated riots after widespread famines led to the eventual fall of several dynasties in Chinese history, which Mao knew by heart. Equipped with this knowledge, how could Mao not react if there was a famine going on in China? After all, Mao's goal is to make China strong enough to resist foreign influence, not weaken China with famine.
    2
  12042.  @MarkYeung1  Also, Mao Zedong began importing grain after 1961, but the United States had grain embargos on China, preventing Western sales of food grain to China from countries like Australia and Canada. So it's not that Mao did not want to import grain, it was the US embargo that prevented Australia and Canada from exporting grain to China.
    2
  12043. ​ @MarkYeung1  "Shenzhou. why did Mao took 3 years to act for importing grains?" I've already told you the reason why. At the start, the local provincial governments inflated the crop figures in their reports to Mao, so Mao thought there was surplus grain to export to repay debts to the Soviet Union. Mao himself even personally visited the regions and went on tours of the fields, but the local party officials had workers transfer stalks of grain from dying fields to healthy fields that Mao passed by, thus giving off the impression of a bumper harvest. That's why Mao Zedong was kept ignorant of the true state of the famine until 3 years. According to A Study of China's Great Famine by Wei Xiong, Princeton University, grain imports increased dramatically from 66.3 thousand tons in 1960 to 5.81 million tons in 1961, and that's after Mao became informed of the famine in 1961. After the Xinyang Accident broke out in late 1960, Mao asked his colleagues to visit different regions of the country to collect information about the famine. Mao even asked his security guards to visit their home villages and report back to him what they saw there. This indicates that Mao might have been concerned that his colleagues were not telling him the truth, and he had to rely on his personal guards as trusted informants. Have you actually been reading my posts at all? Or are you just predisposed to pin the blame solely on Mao since that's the way you've been taught to think?
    2
  12044.  @blimpusa  What Uighur genocide? Ethnic minorities in China like Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchu, etc aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 … Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups So what Uighur genocide are you talking about?
    2
  12045.  @blimpusa  Where do you get this figure of "1 million Uighurs" in detention? Turns out this figure came from 2 dubious sources, one of which only interviewed 8 Uighurs on what their estimated number of Uighurs in re-education schools were, and then they extrapolated the figure to arrive at the figure of 1 million Uighurs in detention. Source: Claims that China has detained millions of Uyghur Muslims are based largely on two studies. A closer look at these papers reveals US government backing, absurdly shoddy methodologies, and a rapture-ready evangelical researcher named Adrian Zenz. thegrayzone.com/2019/12/21/china-detaining-millions-uyghurs-problems-claims-us-ngo-researcher/ While CHRD states that it interviewed dozens of ethnic Uyghurs in the course of its study, their enormous estimate was ultimately based on interviews with exactly eight Uyghur individuals.
    2
  12046.  @Joe-pc3hs  China has built at least 35,0000 mosques, which is more than France's 2,300 mosques, America's 2,106 mosques and UK's 1,600 mosques. Even on the per capita basis, Chinese Muslims still have more than triple the amount of mosques that their Western peers have.
    2
  12047.  @epicfap36  Peng Shuai is clearly safe and she's been avoiding the public eye but Western media is behaving like paparazzi and trying to expose her private life for all the world to see.
    2
  12048.  @tsuikr  China's digital Renminbi allows short term visitors to China to enjoy the convenience of WeChat/Alipay, without the requirement of setting up a Chinese bank account.
    2
  12049.  @edgelord8337  I'm afraid you're correct in that I don't recognize you, sorry for that. I'm usually on the expat in China channels, but recently the Russo-Ukraine conflict is making headlines everywhere, and that's how I've ended up here. Brian is also very informative on his channel, even if not exclusively about China.
    2
  12050.  @gregbrogan9061  The 1992 Consensus was when Taiwan and the mainland agreed to the One China Policy, that "there is only One China" and that "Taiwan is part of China." And since you admitted that ROC borders haven't been amended, that means according to their constitution, Taiwan still claims all of mainland China, then again, can't the mainland claim Taiwan as part of our territory?
    2
  12051.  @gregbrogan9061  You said: "Even Chinese in Taiwan and Hong Kong hate the PRC. If the PRC is so great, why do your own Chinese brothers hate you so much!?" I'm glad you acknowledge the simple fact that the people in Taiwan and Hong Kong are Chinese. But wheres your evidence that the Chinese in Taiwan and Hong Kong hate the PRC? According to 18:17 of John Oliver's poll, the majority of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo. And the status quo (according to Taiwan's constitution) is that Taiwan is part of China, since no amendments have been made to Taiwan's constitution.
    2
  12052. 其实开始的时候，武汉市政府蛮不称职的，所以要怪就怪武汉市政府。
    2
  12053.  @DuraStop  Historically, Ukraine was part of many empires, including the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, the Austrian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union. Putin said that Ukraine's modern borders were drawn by Bolsheviks, and it included a huge chunk of previously Russian territory (i.e Crimea, Donetsk, Lugansk, etc) so Ukraine never really existed historically as a nation of its own. But if you search for the full transcript of Putin's televised address, he said: "It is not in our plans to occupy the Ukrainian territory."
    2
  12054. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt, have long since faded to history.
    2
  12055.  @Waverlyduli  You're saying that China is promoting a Han ethno-dictatorship? If that's the case then why is it the Chinese government confers special privileges to ethnic minorities in China? For example, ethnic minorities (i.e Tibetan, Uighurs, Manchu, Mongols, etc) aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Ethnic minorities also enjoy special tax exemptions, priority in healthcare, free education for up to 15 years (9 years for Han), government bursaries and special education admission advantages. For example, if a Han candidate needs say 600 points to qualify for a certain university degree, then an ethnic minority candidate needs only say 400 points (easier to qualify) for the exact same course. This is the complete opposite of what a Han-supremacist state would do, by offering privileges to ethnic minorities instead of the Han majority.
    2
  12056.  @Waverlyduli  I watched Cyrus Jannsen's videos, and the consistent message he is sending is to promote peaceful cooperation between USA and China. That's the positive message Cyrus is promoting, and if you're claiming that he is somehow spreading the same peaceful message as the Communist Party of China, then frankly speaking, isn't that good thing for the world? I mean, it's no secret today that U.S-China relations have deteriorated to their lowest point in decades, and the possibility of a hot war erupting between USA and China would not only be deleterious for both our countries, but for the whole world as well.
    2
  12057.  @Waverlyduli  So you're saying that Western Media allows the fabrication of lies and fake news in it's content, because it's unregulated, whereas Chinese media is regulated by the government to weed out lies and fake news? And again, it's no secret today that U.S-China relations have deteriorated to their lowest levels in many decades, so a positive message promoting peace and cooperation like Cyrus' message is actually good for diffusing tensions. Because the alternative message (of promoting war) is simply unthinkable, it's going to be deleterious for the world if war breaks out between USA and China.
    2
  12058.  @Waverlyduli  Firstly, I'm not sure if you are familiar with Asian naming, but the family name goes first, so for Xi Jinping, his surname is Xi, not Ping. So it's President Xi, not Mr Ping. Secondly, about East China Sea, the Diaoyu Islands were historically part of China, but were taken and occupied by Japan during the war. After the Japanese WWII surrender, Japan relinquished all its previously occupied territory, yet why wasn't the Diaoyu Islands returned back to China?
    2
  12059.  @Waverlyduli "神州 Shenzhou Stop spreading lies, Mr Ping." By continually using the wrong surname for Xi Jinping (even after being informed of the proper surname) it just goes to show your racist behavior against Eastern naming convention. And which lies have I spoken? You claim China is Han-ethno supremacist then why are ethnic minorities in China conferred such privileges that even Han don't get to enjoy? And Cyrus Janssen's message is a positive one for the one, one of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" and promoting understanding and cooperation between USA and China. Because the alternative message (one of promoting war) is simply unthinkable. A hot conflict between USA and China would not only be deleterious to both USA and China, but for the whole world as well.
    2
  12060.  pipper donnie  If you're comparing China to a fascist nation like Nazi Germany, then Hitler promoted racial supremacy and demonized the Jews as inferior races through antisemitism. If China was truly behaving like Nazi Germany, then we should be seeing similar racial supremacy promoting Han while demonizing the ethnic minorities (i.e Tibetans, Uighurs, etc) as inferior in Chinese media. But I watched Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV, and they proudly showcase ethnic minority culture, language, festivals, cuisine, traditional clothing, traditional instruments, song and dance. Ethnic minorities aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want, and the ethnic minority population in China actually increased over the years. Chinese media promoting ethnic minority culture today is the complete reverse of what fascist Nazi Germany did when they demonized the Jews as inferior in Nazi media.
    2
  12061.  pipper donnie  You said the People's Republic of China is never Chinese Culture, but if you look at history, China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. Throughout its history, China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. The current political system of China under President Xi Jinping and the Communist Party of China closely emulates the governing style of the Emperor and the Imperial Court of ancient China, at least more closely than a Western style democracy. This shows that not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    2
  12062.  @Waverlyduli  Are you perhaps describing yourself when you said that?
    2
  12063.  @Waverlyduli  How am I obfuscating reality when all my arguments are based on fact, data and evidence? Whereas all you done is hurl accusations without substanciating your claims that's all.
    2
  12064.  @Waverlyduli  What 2016 court ruling? There are so many courts and so many rulings in 2016 then how do you expect me to know what you're talking about?
    2
  12065.  @Waverlyduli  Whoever said communism is a race? You're calling Xi Jinping by the improper name Mr Ping, when his surname is Xi, not Ping, then you're being racist against Asian names (even after being told that it's the wrong format).
    2
  12066.  @Waverlyduli  So since you admitted that Democracy is a foreign system imported by Asian countries, then can't China import communist ideology? I've already shown that throughout China's 5,000 years of history, China had been under authoritarian rule of the Emperor and the Imperial Court, so China's current system closely emulates the governing system of the China's ancient past, at least compared to Western style democracy. Also communist ideology has transformed poor countries into superpowers. For example, before 1917, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe at that time, dominated by peasants, whose traditional household economies were extremely inefficient compared to agriculture in Western Europe or the United States. Only about 15% of the population lived in towns, and fewer than 10% worked in industry. Russian was technological backward and lagged far behind advanced capitalist countries like Great Britain and Germany. But after the 1917 Communist Revolution by the Bolsheviks, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe during its heyday, both economically as well as militarily (that's why NATO was formed in response to Soviet Union's rising military might). The Soviet Union also made numerous advances in science and technology. According to Wikipedia: List of countries by largest historical GDP the Soviet Union was the world's 2nd largest economy from 1960 - 1990 Such an ideology that transformed arguably once Europe's poorest country into its strongest, so how is communist ideology is demonstrated to have failed comprehensively?
    2
  12067.  @luodeligesi7238  Because those neighbors think it's cool to be part of the EU or NATO, when those organizations are actually created by the United States to further their U.S hegemonic interests.
    2
  12068.  @MarkYeung1  So you are in support of the mainland interference in Hong Kong's affairs through backing the Hong Kong government going after property tycoons? But doing so might be viewed in a negative light by Western MSM, not to mention some Hong Kong people who don't want Beijing's interference in Hong Kong's affairs. Such anti-China forces would take this opportunity to drive a wedge between Hong Kong and the mainland. What other sources of revenue can offset the lost of Hong Kong government revenue? Hong Kong has been called a "tax haven" for corporations, who pay little to no tax to set up shop in Hong Kong, that's why Hong Kong government needs to seek out alternative sources of revenue, such as the sale and taxation of land. Hong Kong government is not going to to starve itself by going after the property tycoons and biting the hand that feeds it.
    2
  12069.  @MarkYeung1  How? The mainland lets Hong Kong to have their own separate government from the mainland. Previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under the authoritarian rule of colonial Britain, during which Hong Kong people did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong while it was a British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's handover that Hong Kong people finally get to vote for their favorite leader. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    2
  12070.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Make it 19 percent. It is a start. You won't see anyone protesting on the streets." But increasing Hong Kong's taxes would make Hong Kong less attractive for foreign investment. What makes Hong Kong a tax haven is that there is a 0% tax rate on all foreign-sourced income. Meaning if you own a company that is incorporated Kong Kong and are a non-resident and all the income is derived from outside the country, then you have no tax obligations.
    2
  12071.  @MarkYeung1  Hong Kong clearly have their own separate government from the mainland, what are you talking about? Hong Kong government IS NOT the mainland government in Beijing. Hong Kong has their own separate currency, Hong Kong dollars instead of Renminbi. Hong Kong have their own separate judicial courts from the mainland. Hong Kong have their own separate passport from the mainland passport. Please explain how Hong Kong doesn't have their own separate government. Carrie Lam won the three-way 2017 Hong Kong Chief Executive election by garnering 777 votes out of the 1,200 Election Committee (which consist entirely of Hong Kong groups) and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections. So how does Hong Kong not have democracy? The basic premise of democracy is that citizens can vote for their favorite leaders in elections, and that is precisely what Hong Kong has.
    2
  12072.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Before 1997, Hong Kong people trust the colonial government's authority, that's why they didn't ask for democracy or independence," Many in Hong Kong are suffering from the mental damage inflicted by colonization on the mindset of the colonized. The British may have left Hong Kong after the 1997 handover, but many in Hong Kong still retain the subservient colonial mindset that accompanies colonization. While there is physical decolonization in Hong Kong, the decolonization of the mind takes time to heal. The Communist Party of China doesn't have much trust among the young Hong Kong people, because much of Chinese modern history wasn't taught in Hong Kong schools. Students in Hong Kong learn ancient Chinese history at school, but the curriculum stops just at the start of the Opium Wars during the 19th century, so many Hong Kong youth are unaware of the Century of Humiliation that the mainland suffered at the hands of foreign powers.
    2
  12073.  @MarkYeung1  Beijing does not cast any votes in the 1200 election, those votes were all cast by Hong Kong groups themselves, so explain how does Hong Kong not have democracy? Hong Kong clearly have their own government separate from the mainland, please explain how Hong Kong government is the same as the mainland?
    2
  12074.  @MarkYeung1  "but most of the vote casters have political and business connections to China. This is not full democracy." Because mainland China is Hong Kong's largest trading partner then why can't the voters cast votes that promote more business between Hong Kong and the mainland? And what is "full democracy"? Hong Kong voters cast votes and elect their leaders, it's already a huge improvement over back when Hong Kong was under the authoritarian colonial rule of Britain for 150 years during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy.
    2
  12075.  @MarkYeung1  Who says many Chinese youth are not aware of the Great Leap Forward (大跃进) and Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution (无产阶级文化大革命)? Just login to Baidu (Chinese Wikipedia) and they have entries for 大跃进 and 无产阶级文化大革命, so what makes you think Chinese youth aren't aware of these?
    2
  12076.  @Daylightmotion  According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore hrw.org/asia/singapore Singapore’s political environment is stifling. Citizens face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. In 2017, the country tightened the already strict limits on public assemblies contained in the Public Order Act, which requires police permits for any “cause-related” assembly outside the closely monitored “Speakers’ Corner.” Now doesn't that sound exactly like China?
    2
  12077.  @Darkademic  You said: "because "proper" Marxism was a catastrophic failure and is unsustainable." Take Russia for example. Before the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe. Tsarist Russia was comprised overwhelming of peasants and only about 15% of the population lived in towns and fewer than 10% worked in industry. Agriculture provided the livelihood for 80% of the population, and Russia was technologically backward compared to advanced capitalist countries like Great Britain and Germany. But after the Bolsheviks came to power, the new Soviet Union rapidly developed to become arguably the strongest country in Europe during its heyday. The Soviet Union was the largest economy in Europe, and presumably the 2nd in the world, just behind USA. In terms of military, the Soviet Union had the most military might of any European country. The Soviets also made numerous scientific and technological advancements, such as launching the world's first satellite, Sputnik-1. Such a philosophy transformed what was arguably the poorest country in Europe into its strongest, how then can Marxism be classified as a catastrophic failure?
    2
  12078.  @Darkademic  You said: "Unfortunately I think China is currently moving away from freedom and towards authoritarianism... The effects are already being seen... youth unemployment is very high," Isn't youth unemployment is an example of more freedom, not authoritarianism? Had China been moving towards authoritarianism, then the government would be forcibly assigning jobs to the youth, instead of allowing them more freedoms to choose what they want to do. How does your logic make sense here?
    2
  12079.  @Darkademic  "And again, I don't agree that China has any more "civilizational continuity" than anywhere else in the world. Modern China has far more in common with modern Western countries than it does with ancient China (and modern Western countries have more in common with modern China than with ancient Rome, Egypt etc.)." Modern countries are of course similar to each other, because of modern interaction, trade and communication with each other. Civilizational continuity is more like a state's own "link to it's past" that's continuously being preserved by its government. China does share similarities with other modern states, but at the same time, China cherishes its established link to the past, and the government sees itself as a keeper of Chinese civilization.
    2
  12080.  @Darkademic  "Because ~40 years ago China abandoned socialism and embraced capitalism to a significant degree." Nope, China did not abandon socialism and it remains one of the core principles of the China's government policy, merely with "Chinese Characteristics" as an addendum. China may have participated in the global marketplace, but ultimately the Chinese government retains control over the internal markets and this is what's responsible for China's rise. For example, back then the foreign companies like Apple or Nike wishing to start a business in China have to agree to the condition to "transfer technology" to local Chinese companies. Or alternatively, agree to partner up with a local Chinese company in order to do business in China. These are clearly government imposed conditions, yet they were readily accepted by Apple and Nike who wanted access to the potential of China's enormous market. Therefore, it's actually socialism (i.e government control) over China's internal market that enabled China's rise in the end. Otherwise, Western companies have been investing in other huge population countries like India or continents like Africa, yet none were as successful as China's rise. Had the success been due to capitalism, then China's success should be easily replicated in other countries like India or the African continent.
    2
  12081. Organizations funded by foreign governments and interfering in your country's elections is certainly not democracy at work.
    2
  12082. +Donald Kasper Education in China China has become a top destination for international students. As of 2013, China is the most popular country in Asia (surpassing even Japan and South Korea) for international students, and ranks 3rd overall among countries. As of 2018, the country has the world's 2nd highest number of top universities. Innovation in China According to Global Innovation Index, China was ranked 25th in 2016, 22nd in 2017, and 17th in 2018. Following this trend of improvement, China could become among the top 10 most innovative countries by 2020 Science and Research in China China has overtaken the U.S. in terms of the number of scientific papers published, according to the Science and Engineering Indicators report issued by the U.S. National Science Foundation, producting 426,165 peer-reviewed science and engineering articles in 2016, as compared to the USA's 408,985 papers. China is also home to the world's fastest supercomputer, Sunway TaihuLight 神威·太湖之光 as well as the world's 2nd fastest supercomputer, Tianhe-2. In a recent Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat the USA, with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Supercomputers help scientists and researchers to compute solutions to complex equations and are invaluable to research.
    2
  12083.  @YinZhiLong  The Hong Kong Police are so busy dealing with the HK protestors and rioters and their manpower and resources are all tied up so how to spare the manpower and resources to conduct proper investigation into their deaths? Why don't you ask the HK protestors to stop protesting, so the HK police can look into their deaths? Total blackout in MTR station? Then how do you know who started beating who? And unless MTR security camera can still function in complete darkness, then what's the point of releasing the footage? If its a total blackout like you said, then is there power supplied to the cameras to continue recording?
    2
  12084.  @ezmode946  Modern China was built by the sweat, blood, tear and sacrifice of the Chinese people and our government, to turn China from dirt-poor, war-torn starving country in the past, into a modern economic powerhouse, the world's factory (Made in China), a growing scientific and technological power, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, and China today has strong global prescence as well as being influential player of world politics. And it's all been achieved under CCP leadership, which the Western anti-Communists been constantly denouncing all the time. So why continue to believe the Western propaganda, when China is thriving under CCP leadership?
    2
  12085.  @drpk6514  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Mozambique, Tanzania, Zimbabwe. Whereas the United States is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, etc even in the 21st century. The USA is bombing those Middle Eastern countries and destroying lives and property (Iraq Body Count Project reported some 200,000 civilian deaths) and leaving families broken, jobless and homeless so many of them flock to join the terrorist's cause. Why don't you open your eyes to the true contributors to terrorism? China is doing the world a favour by preventing these Uighurs from joining terrorist cause and can't you see it?
    2
  12086.  @drpk6514  You keep on repeating that people hate China, then where's your proof? According to World Tourism Rankings, China is world's 4th most visited country, after France, Spain and the United States, seeing some 60.7 million international tourists in 2017. Source: World Tourism Rankings wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings China is also the most popular Asian tourist destination surpassing even other Asian destinations like Japan, Korea, India, Thailand, Singapore, etc. So why do you keep on claiming that people hate China? Where's your proof?
    2
  12087.  @michaelloedel750  You can't even spell my name correctly in the first place. Or perhaps are you referring to some other user by the name of Shenzou?
    2
  12088.  @cx9882  That's not the same as wearing Muslim headveil which can obscure facial identification at checkpoints. Even many Western countries banned the Muslim headveil too in their countries, so why can't China do too? Source: Hijab by country wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijab_by_country -Austria: In 2017, a legal ban on face-covering Islamic clothing was adopted. Headscarves were also banned in 2019 from primary schools. In 2019, Austria banned the hijab in schools for children up to ten years of age. -Belgium: As of 2015, Belgium has specific bans on face-covering dress, such as the Islamic niqab or burqa. -Bulgaria: In 2016, a ban on the wearing of face-covering Islamic clothing in public was adopted -Kosovo: Since 2009, the hijab has been banned in public schools and universities or government buildings. -Denmark: In 2018, the Danish government passed a law prohibiting people to wear "attire and clothing masking the face in such a way that it impairs recognizability". -France: In 2010, a ban on face covering targeting especially women wearing chador and burqa, was adopted. -Germany: In 2017, a ban on face-covering clothing for soldiers and state workers during work was approved. -Latvia: In 2016, a ban on the wearing of face-covering Islamic clothing in public was adopted -Netherlands: In January 2012 enacted a ban on face-covering clothing was enacted. -Norway: in 2018 the Norway parliament voted to ban the burqa in schools and universities
    2
  12089.  @Lu5ck  China has kidnapping and child-trafficking problems (as I highlighted previously) so why can't the government install better security measures like barbed wire into our schools and kindergartens?
    2
  12090.  @MrRedmer  Why'd you keep on bringing up Nazi propaganda? China is NOT Nazi Germany so what's your point? And you just going to blatantly ignore the numerous terrorist attacks in Xinjiang, that I brought up previously? In the footage below, Uighurs rioters in Urumqi just suddenly attack random Han passers-by and stab them with knives. They overturn vehicles, set them on fire, broke into Han business stores, loot them and then set them on fire. Video: Uighur people riot and break into Han store youtu.be/j1gbwrLXYDM But of course not all Uighurs were rioters (only those who've been brainwashed by Islamic radicalism) and there were numerous accounts of Uighurs helping Han victims flee the rioters. But thanks to the government today, there have been no more terrorist attacks in Xinjiang since this education program started. Yet you claimed Xinjiang was peaceful place over 15 years ago? You yourself never been to Xinjiang, yet talk as if you know the place?
    2
  12091.  @Max-is4qu  Why harvest organs from kindergarteners? Who would want kindergarteners organs that haven't even grown yet? Don't you even use your brain to think before you post?
    2
  12092.  @knowitall5913  I've been to Minnesota, Iowa, Kentucky and visited New York, Last Vegas, San Francisco, etc. I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, yet I was appalled at the sheer amount of Western anti-China propaganda out there. Whenever I bring up China's achievements, some Westerners just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill, or told me to "Go back to China if you like it there." They act like they know China better than me, even though I literally grew up in China and they have never actually set foot in China and see what life is like here for themselves.
    2
  12093.  @chrishannis1  When I spoke Mandarin (instead of Cantonese) in Hong Kong, some Hong Kong people treated me coldly, but when I open my mouth and speak English to them, many Hong Kong people started warming up. It's like they look down on mainland China, when we were poor, yet now that mainland China is flourishing, they still retain the same colonial mindset under British colonial rule?
    2
  12094.  @chrishannis1  If you're glad about Chinese achievements, you should see China's world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours.
    2
  12095. Western MSM: "Ukraine is winning the war, Russia is surrendering soon!" Also, Western MSM: "Zelensky is asking for more NATO weapons!"
    2
  12096. China desires stability in Hong Kong, so why would the mainland government cause instability in Hong Kong? Hong Kong will eventually be fully returned back to China by 2047 anyway without the mainland lifting a finger, so why would the mainland stage protests in Hong Kong?
    2
  12097. For people who want proof it should be called the CPC and not CCP, the actual name of the party is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where Zhōngguó (中国) means China and Gòngchǎndǎng (共产党) means Communist Party. Therefore, it should be called the Communist Party of China (CPC), not the Chinese Communist Party, CCP.
    2
  12098.  user-fk8nl5hn1v  Why Cyrus include sponsors in his videos then?
    2
  12099.  @stunningandbrave2520  You said: "Most of his vids don't have sponsors, so your argument is flawed." If Cyrus was truly being paid by China then there will be no need for sponsors at all. But the fact Cyrus has sponsors in at least some of his vids, just goes to show he isn't.
    2
  12100.  @item6931  So I take it that you can't refute my point, so you resort to ad hominen attacks against me, instead of attacking my points? If he was paid by China, why include sponsors at all in his vids?
    2
  12101.  @item6931  The point is why would Cyrus accept sponsors in his videos, if he was supposedly paid by China? What's the point of having any sponsors in his videos at all, if he's already being paid?
    2
  12102. My family very low income and can't even afford traditional 茶叶蛋 tea leave egg snack.
    2
  12103.  @laserraiset3300  Russia is the world's largest exporter of wheat, are you sure the food prices in Russia are more expensive than in the EU?
    2
  12104.  @MarkYeung1  If Russia is doing badly in Ukraine, then why was Bakhmut captured?
    2
  12105.  @laserraiset3300  Did you know that people living in former Soviet Union states experienced a drop in life expectancy after the USSR dissolution? This meant that people lived longer lives in the Soviet Union than after its dissolution.
    2
  12106.  @bartonlee3594  So you speak Germany? Why is it that many Germans aren't raising questions about Nordstream?
    2
  12107.  @laserraiset3300  Why are the European farmers protesting then, while Russian farmers are still living life as normal?
    2
  12108.  @bartonlee3594  One thing's for sure, both India and China have not condemned Russia's special military operation in Ukraine, so this appears to be one area in which India and China have the same stance. Also, more countries have applied to join BRICS, like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Indonesia, Egypt, etc.
    2
  12109. It's the Tortoise and the Hare. NATO (the Hare) is slapping sanctions on Russia and pouring lethal aid into Ukraine, and they've basically exhausted their sanction options and are running out of lethal aid to send, before the finish line. Whereas Russia (the Tortoise) is slowly and steadily grinding down resistance and making progress towards the finish line.
    2
  12110. The Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, Europe, USA and India. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    2
  12111.  @nathanzhang9872  我创造这频道让我跟你说话，难道你还不懂我的意思吗？
    2
  12112.  @DZ477  What US donations? China has not received Covid-19 aid from the US government. Video: China says it has not received COVID-19 aid from U.S. government youtu.be/08jGgTuXTuw "US officials have said on several occasions that they will provide 100 million US dollars in anti-epidemic assistance to countries including China. I don't know if other countries have received it but I tell you clearly so far, China has not received any money or materials donated in the name of the government." - Geng Shuang, Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson.
    2
  12113. Prior to PRC, the Republic of China (1911-1949) was also governed by authoritarian single-party Kuomintang, and not a Republic. No elections ever occurred during KMT administration of China, and ROC was divided into several provinces controlled by individual warlords. Even Tibet broke free of ROC's rule in 1911 and KMT failed to recapture it even after 38 years of ruling China. But Mao Zedong managed to unify China (which the previous KMT administration failed to do so) under communism and founded PRC in 1949. Tibet was finally brought back to China in 1951, so isn't the communist party more competent than the KMT with regards to unifying China? I know the Western anti-communist media always label communism and Mao as bad, but if not for Mao, China today would still be fragmented and ruled by individual warlords (like shown in the uploaders video)
    2
  12114.  @Schmuney  About the Social Credit System, many foreigners often complain Chinese people spit in public, smoke in non-smoking areas, jump queues, disobey traffic rules, jay walk, drive on wrong side of the road, speed through red lights, etc when not all Chinese people are like that. We Chinese feel embarrassed that such bad people represent China overseas, so the government introduce social credit system to discourage such bad behaviour and promote better behaviour instead. This is a meritocratic system where good behaviour is rewarded and bad behaviour penalised. But if such people persist with bad behaviour, until their scores fall to become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisances of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again.
    2
  12115.  @Schmuney  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. All verified eyewitness present in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 said that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: The Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We’re ‘Remembering’ are British Lies globalresearch.ca/tiananmen-square-massacre-is-a-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies/5386080 (By Gregory Clark) The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing’s iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time — among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    2
  12116.  @Schmuney  According to Jay Matthews, reporter for The Washington Post, as far as can be determined from the available evidence, No one died that night in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 and all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. Source: Myth of Tiananmen archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php
    2
  12117. Agreed. President Biden is looking backward and wants to return USA back to 1950, back when USA was just emerging as superpower. Whereas President Xi is looking forward and wants to take China to 2050 and bring about a prosperous society for the world.
    2
  12118.  @MarkYeung1  You asked "Do you think US and Russia can cooperate?" I watched NBC interview with Russian President Putin and several times, he expressed interest in cooperating with the USA through dialogue, but the NBC interviewer tried to paint him in a negative light that's all. Video: Exclusive: Full Interview With Russian President Vladimir Putin youtu.be/m6pJd6O_NT0
    2
  12119. I don't think communism is to blame here. Marvel/Disney/Hollywood are basically corporations that are driven by capitalism to cater to China's government in order to turn a profit, so shouldn't it be capitalism that's to blame here, not communism?
    2
  12120.  @topsuperseven7910  Have you been to China and seen what life is like there for yourself?
    2
  12121.  @NathanaelHowland  Which part of our vast country of China did you visit?
    2
  12122.  @DelapazTotong  YT has been shadow benning many posts lately.
    2
  12123.  @Erakius323  "The Donbas is part of Ukraine." The War in Donbas had been ongoing since 2014 as an aftermath of the Euromaidan revolution in Ukraine. The Donetsk and Luhansk republics held referendums where about 90% voted for independence from the Ukraine. According to UN figures, since 2014 some 14 000 people in Donbas have been killed as a result of shelling in Donbas.
    2
  12124.  @Erakius323  "How would Ukraine be taking such losses? Their on the defensive." Why is Ukrainian Army resorting to conscripting women, the young and the elderly to become soldiers then? Ukraine launched a ground offensive previously how did that go? In fact, the Ukraine offensive resulted in a net gain of territory for Russia. You said: "And they have better equipment and training." Better equipment as in Leopard Tanks, Bradly fighting vehicles and Challenger tanks? Those vehicles were deployed in the ground offensive yet photos have emerged of those vehicles being destroyed. As for training, Ukrainian soldiers are receiving just weeks of training before being sent to the front lines. Whereas Russia manufactures its own tanks and tank production in Russia has stepped up since the special military operation and mobilized Russian soldiers are given months of training.
    2
  12125.  Gus YAO  According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Wikipedia: Poverty in China
    2
  12126.  Gus YAO  It's true that some corrupt Chinese officials spend their money overseas on property. But at least under President Xi Jinping, the anti-graft campaign in China has extended overseas and more than 1,300 fugitives, including 307 corrupt government officials, were repatriated to face trial in China as the National Supervisory Commission made progress in promoting law enforcement cooperation with other countries. Source: Over 1,300 fugitives hiding overseas repatriated to China in 2018 straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/over-1300-fugitives-hiding-overseas-repatriated-to-china-in-2018 The commission said 1,335 fugitives were brought back to China in 2018, with over 3.5 billion yuan (S$702 million) in ill-gotten gains recovered. The number of fugitives and amount of funds recovered rose by 3 per cent and 261 per cent, respectively, year-on-year.
    2
  12127.  Gus YAO  Besides supercomputers, Chinese scientists also built quantum computing machine that is 24,000 times faster than international counterparts and 10-100 times faster than the first electronic computer, ENIAC. Source: World's First Quantum Computer Made By China fossbytes.com/worlds-first-quantum-computer-made-by-china/ The quantum computer is built by a team of Chinese scientists working at the University of Science and Technology of China, at Hefei in Anhui province. The researchers believe that quantum computing could excel the processing power of supercomputers. Pan Jianwei, a quantum physicist, and an academician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said that quantum computing makes use of quantum superposition principle for ultra-fast parallel calculation and simulation capabilities.
    2
  12128.  Gus YAO  Why Japan, Korea and India don't have their own space stations in orbit you tell me? It's more than 40 years yet those Asian countries haven't launched spacestation, nor have they soft-landed on the Moon? And I asked you which year did Indian "sharma" land on the Moon, yet you refuse to answer, because No Indian has ever landed on the Moon. Source: No Indian has ever put a step on moon. quora.com/Who-was-the-first-Indian-on-the-moon So why you continue lying when no Indian ever stepped on the Moon? You messed up so instead of admitting your mistake, you're claiming that I am embarrassed? Why should I be embarrassed for telling the truth?
    2
  12129.  @shaulsharabi2637  Trump is unlikely to get 2nd term. Trump's tariffs are unpopular among American companies and farmers, so why would they vote for him again? China's tariffs were carefully calculated to target central U.S states farmers to turn those voters against Trump. Furthermore, Trump will probably make another try for his wall at the US-Mexico border if he gets elected 2nd term, so are you sure you want him again as president?
    2
  12130. @Gatlin Grove Hong Kong had been under authoritarian British colonial rule from 1841-1997, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before?
    2
  12131.  @Andy-P  A KMT win on the next Taiwan election, might work to diffuse cross-strait tensions between Taiwan and the mainland.
    2
  12132.  @Andy-P  It doesn't have to be a China take over. President Xi had offered to President Ma to allow Taiwan to keep their government, keep their elections, their passports, currency, even keep their army, but Taiwan would be considered fully reunified with the mainland. That's the beauty of the One Country, Two System policies, it allows different systems to exist within the borders of China.
    2
  12133.  @christinechen6322  US shouldn't interfere with China's internal relations.
    2
  12134.  @stunningandbrave2520  Since according to you, any civilization that produced gold is nothing unique, then likewise the invention of the silicon chip is nothing unique as well isn't it?
    2
  12135. ​ @billyehh  China is investing in robotics and automation to make up for rising labour costs. Already, China is the world's largest market for automation. Asia's first fully automated port is in Qingdao, China, which is more efficient than human labour and is even capable of working at night in complete darkness. This is the kind of advantage that China enjoys that other Asian countries will have a hard time replicating.
    2
  12136. Long-term FPV users are one day going to think they are the real deal, and start running into people and colliding into them.
    2
  12137. Trump's tariffs won't last forever you know. Eventually, even President Trump will have to step down as US president once his term limits are over, and the next US president might just start reversing Trump's policies and lift the US-China tradewar, thus possibly resulting in future economic boom for China as US-China relations resume their previous pre-tradewar levels. Who knows?
    2
  12138. +Ashutosh Sharma China built the world's fastest supercomputer Sunway Taihulight 神威·太湖之光 as well as the world's 2nd fastest supercomputer Tianhe-2 天河-2 and in the 2017 Top500 supercomputers survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers as compared to USA's 144 out of 500. China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance Source: cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/
    2
  12139. Ashutosh Sharma In 2008, China became the 3rd country in the world to conduct our very own "spacewalk", where the Chinese astronaut exited the spacecraft Shenzhou-7 and ventured into the vacuum and low gravity of space. Even India has not conducted a "spacewalk" of its own thus far. China Shenzhou 7 Space Walk Live!! Full Success! Video: youtube.com/watch?v=gMxQEHfU6hM
    2
  12140. +Ashutosh Sharma No, these are my own words. China has even launched our prototype spacestations like Tiangong-1 天宫-1 in 2011 and Tiangong-2 天宫-2 in 2016. Here is a video of a Chinese astronaut giving a "space lecture" onboard the Shenzhou-10 spacecraft while docked to Tiangong-1 directly to her students on the ground, and demonstrating simple micro-gravity experiments to our children. Chinese teacher in space gives space lecture directly to her students on the ground. video: youtube.com/watch?v=OUAuZnpoZ58 By doing this, we are showing future generations of Chinese and imprinting upon their young minds, that China is a modern space nation, and that Chinese people are capable of making the same achievements as the Westerners. So for what reason shouldn't I be happy for my country? But are you happy yourself? From your angry words towards China, somehow you don't seem too thrilled even with democracy in your home country. Instead, it looks like you are angry at China for our successes that's all.
    2
  12141. +Ashutosh Sharma You never answered by previous questions of "why India doesn't even want to sign the NPT, but still wants to get into the NSG?" Yet you want me to answer all your questions when you never answered mine? What killing of alive babies are you even talking about? Abortions happens all over the world, are you going to tell all of them not to abort babies? Look, even in India there are ongoing abortions. Abortions may be legal in India, but 60% are unsafe: Study source: timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/abortions-may-be-legal-in-india-but-60-are-unsafe-study/articleshow/60946913.cms You are talking about Tiananmen Square Incident? Those university students protestors were naive and they live in a world of education and textbook ideals and have not experienced working life in the real world. The students have been protesting for months, but many left before the actual PLA was called in. Otherwise, how to disperse these crowd of idealistic students? Some of the PLA troops refused to open fire upon the unarmed crowd, some of the PLA troops panicked and fired off at students. Others refused to shoot, but were mobbed by angry students who stole their guns and used it against them. You think the whole situation is purely black and white? There are many grey areas, some PLA troops were mobbed to death for refusing to open fire, other PLA troops were shocked and so on. But most of China has since moved on from the Tiananmen Incidents, only people like you suddenly care so much about Chinese, when your own countries has had worst riots than China. I mean, wasn't there a riot in India about some India guru raping his female followers back in 2017? List of Riots In India source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_riots_in_India The 14 Dalai Lama was funded by the US CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas against the Chinese communist government, so isn't the Dalai Lama a traitor to his people, having sold out his country in exchange for foreign aid? A total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program by the CIA. China had lost control of Tibet in 1912 (when Dr. Sun Yatsen overthrew the Qing dynasty) but Tibet was returned to China back in 1951 under the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet 十七条协议 where the Tibetans affirmed Chinese sovereignty over Tibet.
    2
  12142.  @violatedmonkey  So he is admitting that China has electricity then? Green energy too?
    2
  12143.  @0IIIIII  "神州 Shenzhou BBC is from an democratic government, has a reputation for integrity and impartiality and doesn’t take sides" But BBC destroyed their journalistic integrity by applying gray filter to Jason Lightfoot's video of China, and doctored the green trees to appear gray. How is it you refuse to believe this evidence of BBC deliberately portraying China in a negative light? Video: BBC Caught Manipulating Photos in Article about “Chinese Disinfo,” Then Deleting It youtu.be/eS8EceIa1MQ
    2
  12144.  @d9918  I literally gave you the name of the document itself. I have done enough to present my case.
    2
  12145.  @ryanshiflett2178  Then why did you say earlier that mask wearing was common sense, when Western culture perceives masks as being selfish? Also, what do you mean by "神州 Shenzhou right.. but is that wrong though?" Are you saying that it's right or wrong?
    2
  12146.  @justify3733  "神州 Shenzhou They are not reluctant." Even with shortage of masks, many Westerners don't wear cloth masks, scarf masks and other improvised material masks, so they don't seem not reluctant to me.
    2
  12147.  @ryanshiflett2178  If it were common sense to wear a mask during a pandemic, then why do Westerners still need to be persuaded to do so? That shows it's not common sense (at least in the West) like you said.
    2
  12148.  @ryanshiflett2178  But it's clearly not common sense, otherwise why do Westerners still need to be persuaded? Even when Covid-19 struck Hong Kong, many Westerners refused to wear masks. Quora: Why don't Westerners in HK like to wear face masks amid outbreaks of the Wuhan coronavirus? quora.com/Why-dont-Westerners-in-HK-like-to-wear-face-masks-amid-outbreaks-of-the-Wuhan-coronavirus? This shows that it's not common sense and that Westerners need to learn to wear masks. Because mask wearing is just not in Western culture.
    2
  12149.  @ryanshiflett2178  Do you know what the meaning of common sense is? If mask-wearing during a pandemic was common sense then why is it that many Westerners had to be persuaded to wear masks? Because Westerners learnt from Easterners to wear masks, that shows that mask wearing was foreign in Western cultures and had to be introduced.
    2
  12150.  @ryanshiflett2178  So-called Western "scientific evidence" have been saying that "masks don't work". Here's one example: Source: The Healthy American: Science Says Healthy People Should Not Wear Masks thehealthyamerican.org/masks-dont-work “How can a person be forced by any business or government entity to wear a mask (which affects the respiratory system) without having a physical exam by a licensed doctor who approves such an action?” ~ Peggy Hall Science Says Healthy People Should Not Wear Masks Masks reduce intake of oxygen, leading to carbon dioxide toxicity Germs are trapped near your mouth and nose, increasing risk of infection Wearing a mask causes you to touch your face more frequently There is no scientific evidence that supports healthy people wearing masks Masks obscure your facial features and impede normal social interaction Masks make it hard for hearing-impaired people to understand you Masks symbolize suppression of speech (This is what so-called American scientific articles are telling Americans.)
    2
  12151.  @ryanshiflett2178  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    2
  12152.  @ryanshiflett2178  Then why aren't Americans following CDC advice? If it was really common sense like you said, then why do Westerners still need to be persuaded to wear masks in the first place?
    2
  12153.  @ryanshiflett2178  Dr Peter Forster, a geneticist Cambridge University has identified 3 Covid-19 strains (A, B, C) Type-A is believed to have leaped from bats to humans (animal-to-human transmission) and Type-B is mutated from Type-A and found predominantly in China while Type-C is mutated from Type-B and found predominantly outside China, in places like Singapore. Video: No proof that Covid-19 originated in Wuhan: Peter Forster youtu.be/AQQf2yoymu0 The interesting thing is that the Europe and America suffer predominantly from Type-A virus (animal-to-human transmission) and Type-A is predominantly found outside East Asia, in Europeans and Americans.
    2
  12154.  @ryanshiflett2178  So aren't you admitting that it isn't common sense (at least in the West) since Americans need to be persuaded to wear masks? That's the crux of this discussion, but you're acting like mask wearing was in Western culture, when they learned that wearing masks works from Eastern countries. Source: Marketwatch: Why do so many Americans refuse to wear face masks? Politics is part of it — but only part marketwatch.com/story/why-do-so-many-americans-refuse-to-wear-face-masks-it-may-have-nothing-to-do-with-politics-2020-06-16
    2
  12155.  @ryanshiflett2178  Therefore, you agreed that mask wearing wasn't common sense in Western culture pre-Covid19, and they only learnt mask wearing from the Eastern countries, that's exactly what I was trying to say all along that mask wearing was foreign to Western culture and had to be introduced into the Western culture. Yet earlier you said it was common sense?
    2
  12156.  @ryanshiflett2178  So you admitted that mask wearing had to be introduced into Western culture, because there was no pre-Covid19 culture of mask wearing in the West, so how's it common sense to wear masks in the West? You're just agreeing to my point that Western culture didn't have a culture of mask wearing until 1 year ago in 2020. So how's it common sense?
    2
  12157.  @ryanshiflett2178  Since you have long admitted that it is "technically true" that means you supported my argument that wearing masks isn't common sense (at least in Western culture) the Westerners only started wearing masks in 2020. That is, mask wearing in the West has a mere history of 1 year. Vaccines were invented in China, during the 10th century with inoculation of smallpox. The Chinese also practiced the oldest documented use of variolation, dating back to the 15th century.
    2
  12158.  @ryanshiflett2178  "神州 Shenzhou no, I never said mask wearing is not presently common sense in western culture." You just said that Westerners did not wear masks pre-Covid19, that's admitting that Western culture didn't wore masks until 2020. That's only 1 year of history that Westerners been wearing masks, so how's it common sense in Western culture to wear masks? Mask wearing literally had to be introduced into the West by the East. We are talking about culture, which is a set of behaviour built up historically over the years, so again, what's wrong with my saying that Western culture didn't include mask-wearing? Culture is connected to history, so why are you saying that it has nothing to do with the past?
    2
  12159.  @ryanshiflett2178  But we are talking about Western culture, and the term "culture" implies a set of behaviour built up historically over the years, and since you agreed that mask wearing was only part of Western culture for 1 year (since 2020) then what's wrong with my saying that mask wearing is foreign to Western culture and was introduced only recently by Eastern culture? This shows that mask wearing wasn't common sense in Western culture at least, until recently. That's the point I have been saying all long since the beginning.
    2
  12160.  @ryanshiflett2178  Looking at historical context, wearing masks during a pandemic was common sense in Eastern culture (for example, during the SARS outbreak in mainland China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea) but it wasn't common sense in Western culture during the same period of time. All I'm saying is that donning masks wasn't part of Western culture and they had to learn it from Eastern culture. Wearing masks in the West only happened recently in the last 1 year, since 2020, before that, there wasn't any culture of wearing masks during a pandemic in the West.
    2
  12161.  @sebg5145  So during the Covid-19 pandemic of 2020, why aren't many Americans wearing masks?
    2
  12162. You can't trust Trump to make a deal, he'll just overturn whatever you claim and slap more sanctions, on Iran, on Russia, on North Korea, on Venezuela, and any country that displeases the USA.
    2
  12163.  @paul-hh9oc  Because you logic doesn't make sense! Chinese characters are older than the birth of Jesus Christ, and if you claim Tamil Language is older than Chinese characters then who gave Tamil language? Also, the oldest Tamil-Brahmi inscriptions dated to 500 BC, whereas the oldest Chinese characters found were inscriptions on oracle bones dating to 1200 BC. So Chinese characters are actualler older than Tamil written language.
    2
  12164. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  12165. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  12166. Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  12167.  @Kitchguy  46 percent of Americans polled said that they want a No-Fly Zone over Ukraine.
    2
  12168. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead. But what game will India be playing?
    2
  12169. ​ @AravatAi I thought Chess was invented in Persia.
    2
  12170. Farming is the profession that feeds the world, so why are you despising it so much? Where does most of your food come from if not from farmers?
    2
  12171.  @Jeff-ej4wp  Search online for "Meng Pleaded Not Guilty". You've repeatedly accused Meng of being a criminal, well what crime did she allegedly commit?
    2
  12172.  @Jeff-ej4wp  What statement? Meng clearly pleaded not guilty, was released on placed on the first flight back to China. And you still haven't identified what crime she allegedly commit.
    2
  12173. As long as Taiwan doesn't make any move to formally declare independence, then mainland China will not make any move on the island, and continue trading with Taiwan. It's just that a minority of separatists in the island are being encouraged by the USA to move towards independence that's threatening the peace on the Taiwan Strait.
    2
  12174.  @jon-unicorn-doxxer  I'm not sure about the actual Asian American statistics, but according to the following source: Only 5% of characters in 2017's top 10p - grossing films were of Asian descent, with just 4 of the movies featuring an Asian lead character. And 37 of those top 100 movies had no Asian actors at all. Video: Hollywood's Asian Problem youtu.be/0L6IRJExiG0 And as far as I know, Chinese film studios does not any quota on actors, many of our Chinese films feature huge mass of background actors. And it's not just mainland Chinese, there's also Chinese Malaysian actress like Michelle Yeoh and even Japanese actors like Takeshi Kaneshiro that starred in Chinese films like Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and Red Cliff. But the thing is, Hollywood film makers that want their films to do well in China, might be tempted to cast their own Asian American actors in order to attract Chinese audiences. In short, Hollywood still have the power to cast their own actors in their films, but hopefully Chinese influence can shift their target demographics to cast more Asian actors.
    2
  12175.  @jon-unicorn-doxxer  Foreign films in China, like Avengers and Fast and Furious didn't feature any 1 or 2 Chinese actor to be included. And while the percentage of the revenue cut in China may be 25%, but due to China's enormous movie market, producers are still willing to accept these terms for their films to be screened in China, because the potential payoff is huge. And "Crazy Rich Asians" didn't do well in China, because they featured an all Asian cast (which is already the norm for many Chinese movies) So Crazy Rich Asians can't really use its casting alone as its selling point. Plus the story (based on the author's original book) was more or less about Singapore than actually China. There is planned sequel based on the second book, 'China Rich Girlfriend' that may do better than its predecessor.
    2
  12176.  @jon-unicorn-doxxer  Maybe the formula should be "more" Asian actors, not "all" Asian actors.
    2
  12177.  @emilianopimentel4076  So you overlook the U.S when it comes to IP theft?
    2
  12178.  @normaaliihminen722  He's saying that the US Navy is spread thin all over the world, whereas the People's Liberation Army Navy (world's largest navy by number of ships) is mostly concentrated in the South China Sea and East China Sea region.
    2
  12179. @NoRockinMansLand If you claim to be telling the truth, then what's the name of this Chinese company? What's the name of the chairman who issued the apology? What's the name of the other Chinese company that violated the shutdown order? What are the names of the 2 managers that were arrested?
    2
  12180.  @Disconnect17  Did Chinese ever told Westerns to abandon their political system and to take up China's political system? Many Chinese believe that our political system is best for China, and we do not actively seek to impose our political system on other countries. But if others want an alternative political system to Western democracy, then they are always welcome to adopt from China's political system. China has faced a real crisis in the form of the Covid-19 pandemic. The pandemic is like a global test that everyone has to take. China studied extremely hard for the exam and passed the exam with flying colours and we are now celebrating our graduation ceremony. Whereas Western countries did not study for the test (even though they had additional time) and they accused China of cheating, yet now they are blatantly copying China's homework after having labelled China's answers as "draconian".
    2
  12181.  @danpress7745  You said: "Certainly, the democracies have done and do bad things, but it the democracies where people seek entery into. Again, Why?" Because Western countries have such loose immigration laws. Take the United States for example, as long as a foreigner has a family member or relative who's a U.S citizen, they are themselves applicable to become American citizens. That's why many foreigners marry Americans for citizenship, then they can import their entire families into the U.S (much to the disgruntlement of many Americans). Because immigration brings along with it social problems like language barriers, differing customs, and inability to assimilate into their host country's culture, and so on. That's why if you talk to any American, they tend to have strong views regarding immigration. Another reason is because the Western countries go to war in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc, and those conflicts destroy homes and create unstable governments and refugees. With nowhere else to turn to, refugees travel to the very Western democracies that made war on their homelands, because they are the only ones who accept them. I pretty sure that given the opportunity, refugees would very much prefer staying in their homelands, except that war has made that impossible and that's why they travel to the West. If only the U.S and the West did not involve themselves in war in other countries, that would have prevented the creation of refugees in the first place.
    2
  12182.  @danpress7745  You said: "Immigration to the US is a positive. They bring their strength to the US." Immigrants may also bring their weaknesses to the U.S, as well as creating social problems like language barriers, differences in religion, different cultures, and a reluctance for immigrants to assimilate into their host country. You said: "We are richer - better because of immigration" Richer in diversity maybe, but in terms of wealth, if your immigrants are mostly poor refugees, then the money they bring into the U.S is probably negligible. Most immigrants apply for low-wage jobs, much to the disgruntlement of local workers who might view the immigrants as "stealing their jobs". You said: "By far MOST native-born Americans support immigrants." Have you talked to native-born Americans? From you post, it appears that your family are immigrants that have been granted U.S citizenship, so have you actually been in contact with native-born Americans? You said: "Moreover, refugees choose the US and other democracies, they do not choose China or Russia." I've previously answered this point, I pointed out because Western countries have such loose immigration laws compared to China. So the refugees feel like they stand a better chance at obtaining U.S citizenship than Chinese citizenship. And also there's the fact that China has to host the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people, so China has no real need for additional manpower.
    2
  12183.  @danpress7745  1. Even though the Mongols did conquer Song Dynasty China, it was the Mongolian ruler Kublai Khan (descendant of Genghis Khan) who abandoned his nomadic Mongol ways and adopted Han culture, proclaiming himself Emperor of Yuan Dynasty China (instead of just Mongol Empire). Kublai Khan slept in the Imperial Palace (under a permanent roof), whereas Genghis Khan purportedly never slept under a permanent roof his entire life and was a true Mongolian Nomad. Kublai Khan wasn't and he had been Sinicized. So China was practically a continuous civilization, even while under foreign rule, such as Mongols (Yuan Dynasty) and Manchurians (Qing Dynasty) since those foreign rulers practically assimilated into Han culture.
    2
  12184.  @danpress7745  If you're fascinated by history, then if you look back upon 1000-2000 years of human history, most societies gravitated towards authoritarian systems of government where political power is held by a minority of people, such as nobles (aristocracy), priests (theocracy), or kings and emperors (monarchy). Such authoritarian political systems were predominant throughout the ancient world, because they were stable, and simply because they worked! The society's elites were oftentimes well-educated and politically experienced enough to make decisions regarding the country's direction, while the ignorant masses were kept far away from politics. Whereas if you look at the history of democracy, then it has a long history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, even the Republic of Rome eventually felled. They were the closest thing the ancient world has to democracy, and they weren't successful, and democracy wasn't even popular elsewhere in the world apart from Greece. Modern Liberal Democracy is a different breed altogether, but that means it only has some 100-200 years of history and is no guaranteed to be successful in the future.
    2
  12185.  @danpress7745  For the Gulf War, the U.S used a testimony by a young girl (Nayirah) claiming that Iraqi soldiers were dragging babies out of incubators and leaving the babies to die, but it turns out that this story was concocted to be used as rationalization to support Kuwait in the Gulf War. Also, it wasn't the Afghanistan who orchestrated the attack on the U.S. It turns out that Osama bin Laden was in Pakistan all along, and that it was actually Saudi Arabian citizens who were behind 9/11. Yet the U.S invaded Afghanistan and occupied it for nearly 20 years, before pulling out in a shambolic way, after pouring trillions of dollars into the Afghan war effort. And what a chaotic withdraw it was, such that billions of U.S military hardware were abandoned and fell into the hands of the Taliban, making them probably the most well-armed insurgent group.
    2
  12186. @D0MINIC7 The thing is that Britain itself did not recognize Tibetan independence from China. -In 1906, the British signed the Convention Between Great Britain and China Respecting Tibet (Chinese: 中英續訂藏印條約) concerning Tibet, in which Britain agreed not to annex Tibet or interfere in Tibet's political affairs. -In 1914, the British signed the Convention Between Great Britain, China, and Tibet, Simla in which the British recognize Chinese suzerainty over Tibet. These treaties show that Britain regarded Tibet as part of China and should have consulted China before drawing the McMahon Line. Even today, India still sticks to the McMahon Line instead of negotiating a new border with China that is mutually acceptable.
    2
  12187. @Blackpersontd2345 Quite a number of people on this thread agree with me, and I've also illustrated a few examples of this mindset. Decolonization of a country will not be complete without "decolonization of the mind" as well. If not, then the colonizer still lives in the minds of the local people and continue to subconsciously influence their decisions and direct their actions.
    2
  12188. @truthreal3378 "Upholding them is no more colonial than China enforcing Qing-era maps to justify modern claims." Because those Qing-era maps were drawn up by Chinese ourselves with established historical boundaries, whereas India's claim came from old British maps, and the British are foreigners to this region. Seriously, some white guy from far, far away comes here to Asia and draws some lines on a map, ignoring existing historical boundaries between neighbors, and the Indians take the map as the absolute law, and refusing to negotiate with local neighbors? I mean, look at the African countries for example. How unnaturally straight and squarish the borders between Africa countries are. Their borders were artificially drawn up by their colonial masters, and even after the colonizers left, those artificial borders keep the different African nations at odds with each other and divided among themselves. You said: "why does it dismiss Tibet’s agency in signing treaties, and why did it unilaterally annex Tibet without a referendum or negotiation?" Because Tibet was already part of China before the British arrived in Asia. Tibet became part of China since 800 years when the Mongols conquered both the Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territories into Yuan Dynasty China. Even you've acknowledged that Tibet was part of Qing Dynasty and that it broke away after Qing fell, so can't China reclaim our historical territories? Also, it was the Tibetans themselves who signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet.
    2
  12189. As Chinese myself, I personally found many Hollywood movies to be severely lacking in Asian actors. Asian actors (Chinese,Japanese, Koreans) are simply underrepresented in Hollywood, often casted into cliche roles like martial artist, triad thug, nerdy but social inept guy, hacker, etc. Asian actresses often get roles as damsel in distress (to be saved by Caucasian male lead) or prostitutes, dragon ladies, massage parlor workers, other sexualized roles etc. Also, there's also "white-washing" of Asian characters, that is, the casting of Caucasian actor/actress to portray a character of Asian descent on film. Hopefully, China's influence on Hollywood can grant more prominent roles to Asian actors/actresses.
    2
  12190. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  12191. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  12192.  @christianempire3909  When did Mao Zedong mass murdered people? Those people died of starvation, because of the Great Chinese Famine, which was also caused by bad weather conditions like drought and flood causing destruction of crops and poor harvest. Even Mao Zedong can't possibly control the weather isn't it?
    2
  12193.  @blaisetzu  Explain what you mean by "the conditions are not ideal"? Take the Hanfu Movement (汉服运动) for example, it's a homegrown, grassroots cultural movement promoting Han Chinese fashion. The Korean Hanbok and Japanese Kimono had their roots from the Chinese Hanfu. Also, Tiktok is a culture of sharing short-length videos that's popular among the youth, and you can find many videos of people wearing Hanfu uploaded onto Tiktok.
    2
  12194. Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous relationship with a much older man has been exposed and she has expressed a desire for personal privacy, but the WTA is demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see.
    2
  12195.  @TheDecree93  "神州 Shenzhou thanks for the info and thanks for the message you sent me on why Taiwan is its own independent country." When did I ever send that message to you? If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    2
  12196. Ultra-nationalists and neo-Nazis in Ukraine have been shelling and genociding ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Luhansk (collectively known as Donbas) and killing some 13,000 civilians in those region over the course of 8 years. Russia is not starting a war, it is ending one that was started in since the 2014 coup d'etat of Ukrainian government by USA and NATO.
    2
  12197.  @phyybalance2601  The best course of action to end the war is for Ukrainian president Zelensky to surrender and put an end to the slaughter of his people. It's clear by now that for all their talk, NATO and USA aren't going to send troops to defend Ukraine, and Ukraine's application to join NATO is unlikely to be approved, because that would mean NATO would be obliged to send troops to defend Ukraine if it was a NATO member. So with Ukraine having no way to defeat Russia, the best course of action would be to surrender. But by Zelensky refusing to surrender, he's only prolonging the war unnecessarily. By arming citizens with rifles and rocket launchers, he's trying to maximise the civilian casualties. By removing the age restrictions for conscription, Zelensky is effectively enlisting child soldiers to fight and die for his refusal to surrender.
    2
  12198.  @paradoxine6287  If you don't want Wikipedia, then an article entitled The Treaty Limits of the Philippines (by ResearchGate) also denotes Philippines maritime boundary by the 1898 Treaty of Paris, in which the South China Sea is not included within Philippine territory.
    2
  12199.  @BINI_Maloi_Colet  Why not attempt to refute my points instead of hurling insults against me for my views?
    2
  12200.  @defaultname354  "Shenzhou. since when was Paris a power in anything ?" Paris is merely the location in which the Treaty of Paris is signed, not that the country that the city is located in has the power to enforce the treaty or anything.
    2
  12201. +Matt Right The Philippines took the SCS case to the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which is NOT an official UN agency, unlike the International Court of Justice, which is an official UN agency, so why you claim the ruling was made by an UN court?
    2
  12202.  @nowonmetube  Is there something wrong when such a statement is made by a Chinese guy?
    2
  12203.  @TacticalMayo  Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and its "allies.)
    2
  12204. In 2013, China landed our very own lunar spacecraft and rover on the Moon, marking the first soft landing on the Moon after almost 40 years of neglect by NASA. The Moon is still our closest neighbor in space, and there is still a lot that we don't know about our natural satellite. Shouldn't the human race attempt to colonize the Moon first instead of attempting to reach Mars?
    2
  12205.  @chronokoks  But it's not illegal, which person has been arrested just for login into YouTube while in China, you tell me? There are even Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV operating on YouTube, then how is YouTube banned in China?
    2
  12206.  @chronokoks  Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself? And about Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    2
  12207.  Gaylord Manlove  About solar & wind, Besides dominating hydroelectricity, China is home to the current largest photovoltaic power station in the world, the 850 MW Longyangxia Dam Solar Park in China. The largest floating solar farm in the world is located in Huainan City in Anhui province, Eastern China. Video: World's largest floating solar farm in E China youtu.be/qKpYH5SYUeo
    2
  12208.  @solonavi3928  "神州 Shenzhou all the more to stand by the principle of "being bigger and invading a smaller country is wrong"." If Singapore really stood by its principles, then it would be vehemently against the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999. Singapore should also oppose the Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Yemen War, yet why didn't Singapore slap sanctions on the bigger countries invading the smaller countries?
    2
  12209.  @solonavi3928  You said: "The other commenter I was replying to was trying to implied how similar singapore is to China and like you say we are different and I was trying to tell him that." So clearly, you're the one nit-picking here, yet you're accusing me of nit-picking? And you've made all manner of accusations against China (such as not being inclusive) that have been debunked by Gwen T and me in my previous posts.
    2
  12210.  @qingdaocitizen7957  There's another fake Chinese account, calling him/herself "Chongqing Citizen" and is just as anti-China as you.
    2
  12211. Agreed. The question is not whether China will rise peacefully, but whether China will be allowed to rise peacefully by the West.
    2
  12212.  @Naikomi95  You said: "Brics, the all the coalition of failed states" Yet countries all over the world are applying for membership into BRICS.
    2
  12213.  @Naikomi95  34 countries have expressed an interest in joining BRICS in one form or another. In addition to Turkey, they include countries such as Pakistan, Malaysia, Thailand, Nigeria, Cuba, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Venezuela, Bolivia, Syria, Kazakhstan and Bangladesh.
    2
  12214.  @Naikomi95  Because China and Russia do not have a military alliance. Since you changed the topic, I take it you have no answer to my question I presented above?
    2
  12215.  @Naikomi95  Looks like you've admitted that you're the one crying after all. You're desperate that's why you keep on changing topics.
    2
  12216. It's the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of the West being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today.
    2
  12217.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "Hong Kong can ONLY VOTE FOR approved candidates for elections." That is in accordance with Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條) which states the following: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." - Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 So the Central People's Government (i.e. Beijing) reserves the right to appoint Hong Kong's Chief Executive as per Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45.
    2
  12218.  @rogerdodger8415  Hong Kong's Basic Law was decided between Britain and mainland China during the 1997 handover, through the Sino-British Declaration, so the terms of the handover were agreed upon by Britain and China.
    2
  12219.  @rogerdodger8415  The Henan flooding is a natural disaster and Chinese emergency response teams are on their way to rescue people trapped under debris, how can you blame the Communist Party of China for bad weather?
    2
  12220.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "CHINA AGREED to take it before the court. THEN WHEN THEY LOST, they said it was illegitimate!!" Where did China agreed to take it before the court? On 19 February 2013, China declared that it would not participate in the arbitration. On 7 December 2014, a white paper (source:Source:documentcloud.org/documents/2165478-phl-prc-china-note-verbale.html ) was published by China to elaborate its position.
    2
  12221.  @rogerdodger8415  Your Lowy Institute source refers to the Hague Tribunal as "international legal tribunal" but you yourself admitted that PCA is Not an official UN Agency unlike the International Court of Justice (ICJ), yet why does Lowy Institute refuse to use the actual name of the Tribunal, the Permanent Court of Arbitration? They are trying to misguide people into thinking the tribunal was performed by the ICJ, when it was by non-UN agency like PCA Also, clearly outlined that USA doesn't even ratify UNCLOS yet they are claiming the right to conduct Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOPS) in South China Sea, goes to show it's hypocrisy that's all. Since Washington refuses to ratify UNCLOS, then why should Washington be concerned with Beijing's EEZ?
    2
  12222.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou Ahhh. But it IS a crime. Had you just continued negotiations..." Didn't you read China's white paper that you linked? Point 5 says: "China and the Philippines have not yet had any negotiation designed to settle their relevant disputes in the South China Sea." so what continued negotiations are you talking about? Instead of settling disputes through negotiations, Philippines choose to unilaterally take the issue to court, violating its 2002 Declaration on Code of Conduct of South China Sea and without even informing China of it's decision to do so. So how's it a crime?
    2
  12223.  @rogerdodger8415  If the landlord comes to your house, claims that it's his property, wants to kick you out (because you haven't been paying rent for months) and he has the title deeds to the place, then that's certainly not a crime. Even your court that rejected the claim doesn't have jurisdiction over the issue, and Western media are trying to frame the Permanent Court of Arbitration as the International Court of Justice, (calling it UN tribunal, Hague tribunal, International Court, etc) when it turns out that the PCA is not an official UN agency (like you admitted earlier) unlike the ICJ, then China reserves the right not to adhere to a non-UN agency ruling. Furthermore, China publicly stated that we won't participate in the hearing through our white paper.
    2
  12224.  @rogerdodger8415  So where's Philippines "title deeds" to the property? China has issued many historical evidences to support our claim, where's Philippines historical evidence? China first claimed South China Sea Islands back in 1947 when Republic of China published the 11 Dash Line (of which the 9 Dash Line by People's Republic of China is based on) and nobody objected to this claim, not Vietnam, not the Philippines, not even the USA. The Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence in 1946 that the Spratlys was not Philippine territory, both to not anger Chiang Kai-shek in China and because the Spratlys were not part of the Philippines per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America. The Philippines gained independence in 1946, but when nationalists within the Philippine government wanted to claim the Spratlys, their American advisors discouraged them. The Spanish-American treaty of 1898 made it clear that the western limit of the Philippine islands did not include the Spratlys, Source: Page 11 War Or Peace in the South China Sea? by Timo Kivimäki, https://books.google.com/books?id=CNVf9R_L5FAC&pg=PA11&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
    2
  12225. +LEFT4BASS Why is enforcing that One Child policy on the population at large considered a bad idea? China is world's most populous country as compared to South Korea, so why compare China to S. Korea? China had much more poor people to lift out of poverty, so what makes you think you can apply what S. Korea did to China? Also, S. Korea's rapid advancement occurred uder the S. Korean dictator, Park Chung Hee, who introduced martial law in S. Korea and made the government authoritarian. But under his dictatorship, S. Korea rapidly modernized and that's why Park has been ranked by the public as the greatest South Korean president but he still remains a controversial figure for his dictatorship. If you want to compare China's situation, a better example would be India, the world's 2nd most populous country. India today is suffering from overpopulation, high child mortality rates, high child malnutrition, etc (similar problems faced by China back then) India tried to introduce population control measures (India's mass sterilization) but failed, and that's why India is plagued by overpopulation problems. China would most likely have ended up like India if we didn't introduced population control measures of our own. "The biggest problem the one child policy is just what this video described." When China was undeveloped country, we suffered from 3rd world problems (starvation, poverty, high birth rate, etc) Now that China is developed country, we suffer from 1st world problems (rising costs, high birth rate, aging population, etc) so what is the big deal here? Other developed countries, like Japan for example, also have low birth rates and aging population, even when they did not have a One Child Policy, so what is the link between that policy and the problems you described? " A two child policy would have provided a lot more replacement workers, but still shrunk the population." How do you know for sure that a two child policy would still shrunk the population? With 1 child, families need only concentrate their resources into raising him or her into adulthood, but with 2 child, the resources would be split in half. So China might possibly remain mired in poverty with a 2 child policy, according to this logic. China today is prosperous and is the world's 2nd largest economy, so why do you think that there are dark days ahead? Look at some of China's scientific progress for example. China build one of world's fastest supercomputers, Sunway Taihu Light : 神威·太湖之光 and in 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, as compared to USA's 144 out of 500. China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/
    2
  12226. +LEFT4BASS What makes you think population density is the decisive factor here? True, China has a lot of people and a lot of land, but what makes you think all of our land and resources is being utilized at once? China's land is so vast, you think all the untapped resources are immediately available at our disposal straight away? And like it or not, China still have a larger population of poor people to lift out of poverty than S. Korea, isn't it? According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an amazing feat considering that China is world's most populous country yet achieving 96% literacy and 6% poverty. China would not have been able to accomplish this, if not for the One Child Policy reducing our birthrate, so that available resources can be used to lift single-child families out of poverty. Wikipedia: Poverty in China Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China "And the reason the one child policy was such a bad idea was because it helped China in the short run, but in the long run, it’s going to hurt China a lot." What makes you sure that the One Child Policy will hurt China a lot in the long run? You mean you have seen the future and predicted that is will hurt China a lot? Look at Japan and other developed countries having similarly low birth rates and aging populations, and they did not have One-Child Policy of their own, so where is the link to the One Child policy hurting China's future? I mean, your statements are superficial and don't elaborate or go into detail. Like you said S. Korea advanced rapidly without One-Child Policy and just simply expect the same thing to happen to China? China is China, S. Korea is S. Korea, so why you think what works for S. Korea will work for China? About China's economy going to suffer, Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. Here is compiled list of what Western journalists have been saying about China's economy for decades 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. Buts its already 2018, and China's economy is still going strong so at some point, you should realized Western propaganda is simply biased against China's economy, and have been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years! Why do you still continue to believe China has a dark future, given all your failed predictions about China?
    2
  12227.  @jhunvlogs3304  So do you support Federal Republic of Mindanao independence from the Philippines then?
    2
  12228.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  China treats our nuclear waste to internationally acceptable safety standards before releasing it.
    2
  12229.  @CyrusJanssen  Cyrus if you claim Israel has a "right to self-defense" then shouldn't you also acknowledge Palestine's right to armed struggle against the occupying power? After all, armed resistance against the occupying power is a fact that is acknowledged by international humanitarian law conventions.
    2
  12230. China is already the world's largest producer of renewable energy. China built the world's largest hydroelectric power station, Three Gorges Dam to produce clean green energy to fuel our growth. As of December 2017, China had the largest stock of plug in electric vehicles, and our electric bus industry dominates the world. Source:Wikipedia Electric car use by country But of course, these policies will take time to have an effect on cleaning up pollution in China.
    2
  12231.  @ArghyadeepPal  I watched CGTN, Xinhua news, New China TV and they usually talk about China's achievements, launching new Beidou satellite into orbit, launching a new high-speed rail line, etc. And they invite foreigners to give their viewpoints. Then I watch Western media like Fox News, CNN and BBC and they constantly talk negative things about China, so which are the trolls here?
    2
  12232.  @追寻造物主  大哥，30％精度不代表用多了会比较准确。
    2
  12233.  @chaospilot2142  You live in Germany? How do you feel about the Muslim refugees, fleeing their own conflict-ridden Islamic countries, to seek refuge in your country? Do these Muslims refugees attempt to assimilate into your predominantly Christian country's religion and culture? Or are they under no pressure to adapt to their host country, and instead they proliferate their religion in your lands? Many Caucasian families in Europe are shrinking (low birth rates, high divorce rates) and Muslims refugees are bringing their entire families (and their families are big, especially with 4 wives) over to Germany and displacing your local population demographics. There was even an anti-Muslim protest in Dresden at one point over the rising number of Muslims in your country. Video Germany at odds over its growing Muslim population youtube.com/watch?v=1Cf6dtq0zTc I mean, why are your Western countries bending over backwards to accommodate Muslims? Are they somehow superior to you, that you allow them free reign in your country to do as they please? The German people are hard working and excel at engineering, so why not impart some of these virtues to these Muslim refugees? Likewise, Chinese government is imparting Chinese attributes (like being industrious and studious) onto the Uighurs here.
    2
  12234.  @brotherrefort2492  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    2
  12235.  @phlei95014  "神州 Shenzhou Tokyo was in total ruin," But Tokyo was already previously modernized (compared with other developed Western nations during that era) because of the 19th century Meiji Restoration which occurred under authoritarian rule of Japanese Emperor Meiji. Remember, Japan was Asian's strongest economy and military at the start of WWII, that's why Imperial Japan was able to occupy much of Asia, because of the Meiji Restoration. You're talking about destroyed buildings in Tokyo, but that was after Japan had already modernized under Emperor Meiji.
    2
  12236.  @phlei95014  Chairman Mao is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country, where even the previous Nationalist KMT failed to achieve during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) failed to achieve for 37 years. If not for Mao Zedong, China would most likely still be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong and unified country we are today.
    2
  12237.  @Andy-P  From what I heard, the Taliban promised amnesty to those who previously helped in the U.S occupation of Afghanistan. Also recently, during a conference, Ursula von der Leyen outright stated that "Our goal is not just to freeze, but to seize the (Russian) assets." which is outright theft of a country's foreign reserves. This is perhaps going to speed up de-dollarization.
    2
  12238. China and Russia don't mind sharing the whole world with USA, but apparently, USA is fighting to defend and continue its global hegemony.
    2
  12239.  @mmm6214  I suggest you read Forbes: Why Google Is Quitting China (2010) and it was because Google lost the majority market share to Chinese company Baidu. Baidu also introduced several innovative search features customized for local tastes, while Google fumbled around.
    2
  12240.  @channyvu9798  White means also means "death" and is the colour of mourning in Chinese culture, which means the protest is bound to fail.
    2
  12241.  @yslee1401  Source: Forbes: No, COVID-19 Coronavirus Was Not Bioengineered. Here’s The Research That Debunks That Idea forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2020/03/17/covid-19-coronavirus-did-not-come-from-a-lab-study-shows-natural-origins/
    2
  12242.  @demon2others  The Bald Eagle is balding.
    2
  12243.  @MarkYeung1  "several countries are actively helping Putin by buying Russian oil and gas. And you know which countries we are talking about." In June 2024, the EU was the largest importer of Russian LNG, purchasing 54% of Russia’s total exports. EU natural gas imports from Russia surged by 27% year-on-year in the first half of 2024 and sent EUR 8.7 billion in revenues to Russia. When it comes to pipeline gas, the EU was also the largest buyer, purchasing 39% of Russia’s pipeline gas.
    2
  12244.  @MarkYeung1  That's because China, India and Turkey are buying Russian oil, refining it and re-selling it to the EU (at a profit too). A study from the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) has found that while China, India and Turkey have ramped up Russian oil imports, they've also increased exports of refined products to the European Union. The CREA figures show that the EU has been the biggest importer of Russian refined products, with Australia next. The highest proportions of imported oil products were diesel (29%), jet fuel (23%) and gasoil (13%). According to the study, Western nations that banned Russian oil have together imported nearly $46 billion worth of oil products from China, India, Turkey, etc.
    2
  12245.  @MarkYeung1  It's the EU countries that circumvented their own price cap (or ban) on Russian oil by purchasing Russian oil products from China and India. Furthermore, they are doing this all for the sake of a country that's not even a NATO member. Yet the EU countries continue to send military aid to Ukraine, which only prolongs its inevitable defeat while also allowing USA to fund their military complex.
    2
  12246.  @CaptainGrimes1  Chiang was obsessed with maintaining power, he forbade the use of local languages in Taiwan and, during a period known as the ‘White Terror’, his party was responsible for the imprisonment of 140,000 Taiwanese. These people were taken captive for their alleged opposition to the KMT. At this time, anyone openly criticizing the ruling party was deemed a Communist sympathizer.
    2
  12247.  Tom Collins  Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    2
  12248. Rule No. 1: Don't March on Moscow. Rule No. 2: Don't Bluff Beijing. Rule No. 3: Don't Test Tehran. Rule No. 4: Don't Worship Washington.
    2
  12249.  @MarkYeung1  "Shenzhou. The police were known to under report the numbers." The organizers of those protest are far more likely to overinflate the numbers than the police under reporting them. Hong Kong police have to deploy sufficient vehicles, manpower, barricades, etc for the protest, so they have to be accurate in their numbers. Whereas the organizers claim unbelievable figures of 1 million or 2 million. For comparison, the population of the Gaza Strip in Palestine is 2.2 million (2022 estimate), yet the organizers say that there are 1-2 million protestors?
    2
  12250.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "The voices of Hong Kong people could not have been clearer. Did China listen?" Again, those people were protesting against the extradition bill (which was put forth by Carrie Lam) so what has mainland China even got to do with this? Mainland China did not put forth the bill, it was Carrie Lam who introduced the bill because a Hong Konger had strangled his pregnant girlfriend and flew back to Hong Kong alone, leaving behind her body in Taiwan for the authorities to discover. How many Hong Kong protestors even know about the murder case in Taiwan by that Hong Konger? Also, Carrie Lam announced on 4th Sept that she was withdrawing the extradition bill, yet why is it that the Hong Kong riots continued even after the extradition bill was scrapped?
    2
  12251.  @MarkYeung1  "Shenzhou. What was China's response to the protest in June 2019?" Look, I've been answering your questions all this time, but why haven't you answered any of mine in return? I've previously asked why Hong Kong people continued rioting even after Carrie Lam abandoned the extradition bill on 4th Sept 2019, but instead of answering my questions you continue to ask more? China opposed the riots as disrupting stability in Hong Kong and causing damage to public property. Such violent actions indicate characteristics of color revolutions and signs of terorism among the mobs. It's quite possible that the Hong Kong rioters had received funding from overseas to continue their actions.
    2
  12252.  @MarkYeung1  "Many of the demands are also pointing toward Beijing, such as democratic reforms. What did Beijing say about it?" Where does the June 2019 Hong Kong riots talk about democratic reform in Beijing? Their demands were limited to Hong Kong, and the abolishment of the extradition bill. Yet even when Carrie Lam scrapped the extradition bill on Sept 2019, why did the people of Hong Kong continued rioting? Ultimately, the Hong Kong extradition bill was an internal affair within Hong Kong, and Beijing did allow Hong Kongers to protest and riot for 1 whole year before taking action. It's a shame though, because without the extradition bill, that Hong Konger who strangled his pregnant girlfriend in Taiwan and flew back to Hong Kong, leaving her body for the Taiwanese authorities to discover, has evaded justice altogether.
    2
  12253.  @MarkYeung1  Point out which of the Five Demands was a call for democratic reform in Beijing? You're claiming it was all over Hong Kong media, then why can't you point out where was it calling for democratic reforms in Beijing? Also, why is it that you constantly demand answers out of me, while refusing to answer any of my questions?
    2
  12254. I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    2
  12255. 别的国家也有克隆过动物，为何只怪中国？
    2
  12256. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  12257.  @ColoniaMurder20  Those ancient gold artifacts found in Indonesia and Philippines could be the result of trade with India. Just like there are also Chinese artifacts like pottery fragments found in waters around the South China Sea. Those Buddhist Temples in Thailand, Indonesia, Cambodia, Myanmar was because of spread of Buddhism to the region, and Gautama Buddha himself was born in region that corresponds to modern day Nepal, not India. Sanskrit was the predominant written language of Buddhist texts and that's how the written language in those countries was influenced. So it was mostly influenced by Buddhism, not so much Indian civilization.
    2
  12258.  @ColoniaMurder20  The Kingdom of Tondo was a major trade hub which had established a shared monopoly (togehter with Maynila) on the trade of Chinese goods throughout the rest of the Philippine archipelago, making it an established force in trade throughout Southeast Asia and East Asia. Early travellers from monarchical cultures who had contacts with Tondo included the Chinese, Portuguese and the Spanish. There was hardly any Indian influence in it
    2
  12259. ​ @ColoniaMurder20  It's you who is trying so hard to remove Chinese influence from Southeast Asia. But it's an undeniable fact that China has made an indelible mark on Southeast Asia. I mean, just look at all the Chinatowns across Southeast Asia, in regions like Brunei, Cambodia, East Timor, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, etc.
    2
  12260.  @fireturkeyfly11  "you will understanding why China is not allowed in ISS, because ISS is a civilian, international operations." China's Space Agency is also a civilian organization and China is a part of the international community, yet why is China not allowed on board the ISS. Even Russia is allowed on the ISS, but not China?
    2
  12261. China provides invaluable data about consumers, their preferences, their purchases, their movements, their dislikes, their lifestyles, all to help those big tech companies plan their next product.
    2
  12262. Matt, as an American yourself, did you vote for Joe Biden for President in the 2020 election over Donald Trump?
    2
  12263.  @CyrusJanssen  Cyrus, as an American yourself, did you vote for Joe Biden for President in the 2020 election over Donald Trump?
    2
  12264.  @a04a27  According to your source, even with this Nov. 17 case identified, doctors can't be certain the individual is "patient zero," or the very first individual to have been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Who knows? Maybe the November 2019 Italy Covid-19 cases may have brought the coronavirus from Lombardy, Italy to Wuhan, China, and the Chinese government happens to be the first to have detected it.
    2
  12265.  @vegahimsa3057  Source: Theory that Coronavirus Escaped from a Lab Lacks Evidence the-scientist.com/news-opinion/theory-that-coronavirus-escaped-from-a-lab-lacks-evidence-67229 The pathogen appears to have come from wild animals, virologists say, and there are no signs of genetic manipulation in the SARS-CoV-2 genome.
    2
  12266.  @vegahimsa3057  Japanese have reported that Covid-19 might even have originated in the US. A report from a Japanese TV station that suspected some of the 14,000 Americans died of influenza may have unknowningly contracted the coronavirus has gone viral on Chinese social media, stoking fears and speculations in China that the novel coronavirus may have originated in the US. Source: Japanese TV report sparks speculations in China that COVID-19 may have originated in US en.people.cn/n3/2020/0223/c90000-9661026.html The report, by TV Asahi Corporation of Japan, suggested that the US government may have failed to grasp how rampant the virus have gone on the US soil.
    2
  12267.  @vegahimsa3057  The coronavirus did not originate at a seafood market in the central Chinese city of Wuhan as previously thought, scientists say. Source: Chinese scientists say coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market news.com.au/world/asia/chinese-scientists-say-coronavirus-did-not-originate-in-wuhan-seafood-market/news-story/4a9446377ed0d94e63ea184d008a2e5b The disease, which has claimed the lives of more than 2400 people worldwide, was instead imported from elsewhere, said researchers from Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden under the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Institute for Brain Research.
    2
  12268.  @zackk4969  You said: "Chiina is a thief, a cheater, and a liar" but haven't you heard what the former Director of CIA and U.S State Secretary Mike Pompeo said? He said: "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole!"
    2
  12269.  @sara.cbc92  "神州 Shenzhou Lol, funny wumao. Taiwan makes some of the best tech out there." Take smartphones for example, and mainland China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Vivo, Realme, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Here's a list of the Top 10 Mobile Phone Brands in World in 2021 according to MBA Skool. Top 10 Mobile Phone Brands in World 2021 Ranking List Rank 1. Samsung (Korean) Rank 2. Huawei (Chinese) Rank 3. Apple (American) Rank 4. Xiaomi (Chinese) Rank 5. Oppo (Chinese) Rank 6. Vivo (Chinese) Rank 7. LG (Korean) Rank 8. ZTE (Chinese) Rank 9. Lenovo (Chinese) Rank 10. Realme (Chinese) ... Source: mba SKOOL:Top 10 Mobile Phone Brands in World 2021 Ranking List But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    2
  12270. ​ @The-Crazy-Coonass  Uber's "infrastructure" was using U.S credit cards to pay, using Google Maps to navigate, whereas Didi allowed WeChat/Alipay and used local services, how did Uber leave the infrastructure to Didi? Video: Why Uber Failed in China youtu.be/KAsKPwfkiDw?t=158
    2
  12271.  @aimer3042  Is it wise for USA to half funding to World Health Organization while we are in the midst of a pandemic crisis the likes the world has never seen before?
    2
  12272.  @黄婷婷-y6w  Taiwan doesn't even contribute a cent to the World Health Organization, so why WHO kick mainland China out and let Taiwan in?
    2
  12273. Agreed. At the moment, Netanyahu is only lashing out emotionally and not thinking it through logically. Like what's the end goal if IDF does launch a ground offensive into Gaza? What objectives does the ground offensive hope to achieve in Gaza?
    2
  12274.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "One country 2 systems. Why did China ask Hong Kong to get rid of Android?" Hong Kong Apple users resort to riot and violence, because they think Apple is unquestioningly superior, then why can't mainland China take actions to stop riot and violence?
    2
  12275.  @MarkYeung1  Joshua Wong encourage the United States to slap sanctions on Hong Kong how is he a friend to Hong Kong and the mainland?
    2
  12276. Perhaps the U.S sees India as "the next potential threat" after China and Russia, and deliberately sow chaos in India's neighboring countries like Sri Lanka, like what they did in Ukraine against Russia.
    2
  12277.  @MarkYeung1  "China is the largest food importer in the world." China has the largest agricultural importer, but again, that doesn't directly translate into being a food importer. Here's a Video: Top 15 Countries By Food Imports 1960-2018 ( % of Merchandise Imports ) youtu.be/M3LyAXiLCgc In 2018: 1. Guinea-Bissau (50.69) 2. Benin (47.81) 3. Yemen (46.93) 4. Eritrea (45.55) 5. Kiribati (40.7) 6. Sierra Leone (32.57) 7. Afghanistan (32.27) 8. Equatorial Guinea (31.8) 9. Comoros (31.45) 10. Timor-Leste (30.22) 11. Cabo Verde (30.2) 12. Djibouti (29.32) 13. Sao Tome and Principe (29.21) 14. Samoa (28.43) 15. Antigua and Barbuda (27.77)
    2
  12278.  @abbotsful  Like I said, rice is a staple in many countries, then other countries that depend Chinese rice will be severely affected if there is a food shortage in China. It appears that you come from a country that doesn't depend on rice, but what makes you think you can speak on behalf of the world? And if China was truly dependent on Australian coal then how could China afford to ban Australia coal imports (since last year in 2020) if we supposedly depend on it? It shows that China can continue without Australian coal imports. If a country can afford to ban something and continue, then the country truly isn't dependent on that import. And if you want to bring up coal imports, and claim that the world doesn't depend on China for food, then one thing you depend on China for is products. Because China is the factory of the world (Made-in-China) after all.
    2
  12279.  @Andy-P  You said: "The Chinese savers had done nothing wrong so the Canadian example isn't the same." The Canadian truckers participating in the "Freedom Convoy" demonstration have done nothing wrong either, for what reason did the Canadian government freeze their bank accounts?
    2
  12280.  @宋庆-i4m  So if you consider Republic of China 🇹🇼 constitution invalid that means that People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 constitution is valid, and that Taiwan is part of China under the PRC constitution. Either way, both ROC and PRC consider Taiwan an inalienable part of China.
    2
  12281. There is racism in America against Asian, whether the Caucasians continue to deny it or not. Even the prestigious Harvard is ranking Asian Americans lower than they should be, for fear of their schools being overwhelmed by Asians. Harvard Rated Asian-American Applicants Lower on Personality Traits nytimes.com/2018/06/15/us/harvard-asian-enrollment-applicants.html
    2
  12282.  @klubcj  Singapore's food is heavily sanitized by the government, i.e less salt, less oil and other healthy options which may subtract from its taste.
    2
  12283.  @BrianPYL  Well said. I find that Mao Zedong is oftentimes poorly understood among Western discourse. Many only seem interested to latch on to the famine's death toll, and ignore all other accomplishments by Mao in laying the foundation of the China. Just like that guy responding "no" because he's incapable of thinking beyond a single event.
    2
  12284.  @MA-fg5hz  According to Canada's extradition treaty (Treaty on Extradition Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America) A person may be extradited from Canada only if the alleged criminal conduct in question, and for which the extradition is requested, is recognized as criminal by both countries. So which crime did Meng Wanzhou commit in Canada that is recognised as criminal by both countries? Where's the evidence of Meng's crimes?
    2
  12285.  @MA-fg5hz  So Meng is not on trial then why is she detained? She is being hindered in her work as Huawei CFO because USA is trying to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride. And where's the evidence of Meng's bank fraud? According to Canada's extradition treaty (Treaty on Extradition Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America), Article 9, Section 3: "When the request relates to a person who has not yet been convicted, it must also be accompanied by a warrant of arrest issued by a judge or other judicial officer of the requesting State and by such evidence as, according to the laws of the requested State, would justify his arrest and committal for trial if the offense had been committed there, including evidence proving the person requested is the person to whom the warrant of arrest refers." Otherwise, Meng's being unlawfully detained for 2 years without any evidence of her crimes. Meng is literally kidnapped without ransom.
    2
  12286.  @intothewrx  Previously, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule, during the which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of HK. It's only during the period of Hong Kong's 1997 handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as British colony?
    2
  12287.  @intothewrx  Which part of Sino-British Declaration did China break? Under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, Hong Kong has their own separate government from the mainland government. Beijing does not participate in Hong Kong's Chief Executive elections. For example, Carrie Lam won the 2017 HK Chief Executive election, garnering over 700 votes out of the 1200-member election committee, and Beijing does not cast any votes all they do is appoint the Chief Executive that's all. Explain which part of Sino-British Declaration did China violate.
    2
  12288.  @intothewrx  The Hong Kong extradition bill was proposed because of a certain incident. A Hong Kong guy named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, and stuff her body in her suitcase, before flying back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice for his crime, but Hong Kong has no extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. Source: The Murder Case That Lit the Fuse in Hong Kong nytimes.com/2019/06/15/world/asia/hong-kong-murder-taiwan-extradition.html That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to Hong Kong extradition laws. Do the HK protestors even know what they are protesting for? Have they read the bill and understood its contents in their entirety?
    2
  12289. The Kubuqi desert solar power plant can even produce power at night after the Sun goes down. It uses mirrors to focus the Sun's rays to heat up molten salt positioned at the top of the central tower, which is then used to turn water to steam to drive turbines. The molten salt is able to retain heat long after the Sun goes down, so the power plant can produce electricity even at night.
    2
  12290. +Vision 20/20 In its early years as a nation, Singapore also had pollution problems such as littering, spitting in public, people cutting queues. Even the Singapore River was at one time. massively polluted, so what's the big deal? Eventually, Singapore cleaned up itself, so likewise, China is doing the same by cleaning up pollution in China. For example, China built the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam, to supply China with clean renewable energy. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtube.com/watch?v=b8cCsUBYSkw But of course it will take time to clean up pollution in China, just like it did for Singapore, considering that China has a larger population and more land to clean up.
    2
  12291.  @KobeBeefBryan  About Chinese immigration to U.S, China has world's largest population and there's a possibility that not enough resources, not enough schools, not enough jobs for every single person in China. With such high student population, competition for top schools and higher education is fierce and intense here in China. Some students unable to qualify for local university so they may choose to study abroad in Western countries (especially if their parents have $$$). Some graduates unable to find a job in China, so they may seek employment opportunities outside of China. That's why your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese students, competing with your local students in tests, exams, for university places and even job offers when they graduate. If they can't find a job in your country, they are always welcome to come back to China (thus saving China the resources needed to train this student to university level) and bringing foreign knowledge and technology to our shores. If they managed to find a job in your country, they are depriving a local graduate of a job, and if they rise to high position in corporate or government sector, they may be approached by the Chinese Communist party as a potential spy in your country. Whichever way you look at it, China wins.
    2
  12292.  @Leo-hr7yq  Wasn't Adolf Hitler elected in a democracy, because he preyed on German people's resentment towards the humiliating Treaty of Versailles and he promised to make Germany great again? Similarly, wasn't Donald Trump elected in a democracy, because he preyed on American's resentment against China and seduced gullible voters with false promises of making America great again?
    2
  12293.  @chisauking  "I once witnessed a girl being bullied by his boyfriend or triad member. Over 100 people also saw this but not one came to offer help. I couldn't accept this, so I went up to intervern" From your channel, it appears that you teach Chinese martial arts, so of course you feel confident in handling the bully in case a fight breaks out. But not everyone in Hong Kong knows martial arts and triad members are not to be trifled because who knows if they'll come after your family, grandparents or so on.
    2
  12294. Back then, nobody thought communist China would ever succeed or become successful or become a global player. When Soviet Union collapse and lost control of its satellite states, everyone expected China to follow suit and fragment into different provinces. But despite all that, China defied all expectations and we survived long after the Soviet dissolution and still remained united, when the Soviet Union is no more. Despite some of the communist party's disastrous earlier policies, our population doubled in size, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rate doubled, all under the guidance of CCP. According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39% Today, China is world's 2nd largest economy, protected by world's largest land army, the PLA and our military budget is world's 2nd largest. What did Taiwan achieve for "China" ? Taiwan ruled China for 50 years, yet achieved nothing of utmost importance. Today, Taiwan is not even recognized as independent, and many countries all over the world acknowledge Taiwan as part of China, under the One China Policy.
    2
  12295.  @intothewrx  So how did China not respect the Sino-British declaration? Today, Hong Kong clearly has their own government separate from the mainland and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections, all Beijing does is appoint the Hong Kong Chief Executive, so how exactly did Beijing interfere in Hong Kong's elections?
    2
  12296. In March 2022, Russian forces had Kiev surrounded but later Putin decided to withdrew Russian forces from Kiev as a gesture of goodwill, to create favorable conditions for peace talks with Ukraine. Talks that were later torpedoed by Boris Johnson.
    2
  12297. During the Korean war, PLA troops were mostly poorly trained peasants, our weapons were crappy, our air-support was nonexistent, our supply lines were overextended, and we only had North Korean troops for allies (Soviet Union mostly provided tank support) Whereas South Korea had the combined armies of USA, UK, Canada, Australia, Philippines, New Zealand, Turkey, France, etc. Their soldiers were seasoned and well trained, their weapons superior to the PLA, and they had the advantage of air and naval support with Japan providing material support. Yet the combined powers of 16 countries STILL failed to win the Korean war? Even with PLA's crappy equipment, our poorly trained soldiers, our lack of air support, our overextended supply lines, and with only North Korean soldiers for allies?
    2
  12298. Jose Francisco Bano Because the South China Sea Islands weren't fully explored and this is water not land, so which country in the world draws solid lines in water? At that time, Republic of China didn't follow Western system so how can you force coordinates on us?
    2
  12299. Jose Francisco Bano When did both agreed to leave the area? Philippines did not even consult China, yet Philippines just choose to settle this dispute through 3rd Party arbitration, instead of bilateral negotiations with China?
    2
  12300. +Jose Francisco Bano Why Scarborough shoal can not be claim by any country because it is a shoal? Philippines agreed to Declaration of Conduct of Parties of South China Sea and the Philippines Minister for Foreign Affairs Win Aung signed the declaration in 2012. One of the points mentioned is as follows: 4. The Parties concerned undertake to resolve their territorial and jurisdictional disputes by peaceful means, without resorting to the threat or use of force, through friendly consultations and negotiations by sovereign states directly concerned, in accordance with universally recognized principles of international law, including the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea; Source:Declaration of Conduct of Parties of South China Sea asean.org/?static_post=declaration-on-the-conduct-of-parties-in-the-south-china-sea-2 But Philippines and China did not even conduct any bilateral talks, and Philippines straightaway jump to 3rd party arbitration by court, without informing China of its decision to take the matter to court? The Philippines navy even deliberately grounded a WW2-Era rusting ship, BRP Sierra Madre atop the Second Thomas Shoal in 1999, and began removing Chinese markers to those islands. The Chinese government have offered to repair the vessel to send it on its way, but the Philippine navy refuse to remove the ship, and is reenforcing the hull to prevent the ship from falling apart.
    2
  12301.  Tranquility TenThousand  In China, the Chinese government owns the Chinese military for China's benefit. Whereas in the United States, the U.S military-industrial complex owns the U.S government to wage wars in the Middle East for profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    2
  12302.  @cchannel7857  Cyrus has stated in his email that he's been very busy lately. It's not uncommon among business practices for payment details to be worked out at a later date after the initial business proposal, so what exactly are you trying to say? The end goal is that Cyrus declined payment in the end.
    2
  12303.  @cchannel7857  Cyrus could have forgotten because he was simply too busy (like he said in his email) that's why payment details weren't worked out earlier. Furthermore, he has shown that the payment didn't go through, so what's your point then?
    2
  12304.  @cchannel7857  Remember serpentza's claim that Dune movie posters in China excluded black actress Sharon Ducan-Brewster? Turns out it was false and was debunked as people showed pictures of Dune movie posters featuring Sharon, then how trustworthy is serpentza given that this blatant lie has been exposed?
    2
  12305.  @David-og7di  Cyrus' motivation is to promote peace and understanding between USA and China, because it's becoming increasingly clear that US-China relations are deteriorating which could potentially result in war (which would be disastrous for the world) Because Western MSM are trying to paint China in the worst possible light in order to "justify" a potential war with China, and that's why Cyrus' message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" is very important, so much such that forgoing payment for CGTN to license his video seems minor in comparison. The message may sound corny yes, but if US and China truly went to war, people would have been wishing they paid attention to how they landed up in yet another war.
    2
  12306.  @ThoreVeldur  Putin dropped criminal charges against Prigozhin after he agreed to relocate his forces to Belarus. Putin has also forgiven the members of Wagner Group that participated in the march towards Moscow.
    2
  12307.  HellBlazerMNE07  What makes you think the people in China are slaves? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study and/or play. I mean, everyone has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your countries and spending coin on your tourism industry. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. In 2019, China had the most outbound tourists of any other in the world, yet you think the people are slaves?
    2
  12308.  @shambhutekar5797  You said: "China even announced a tariff exemption for 97% of exports from Bangladesh." Isn't that a good thing for Bangladesh? Currently, 3095 Bangladeshi products enjoy duty-free access to Chinese market under Asia-Pacific Trade Agreement (APTA). With the new announcement, 97% of Bangladeshi products will join this zero-tariff club from July 1 that raised the numbers of Bangladeshi products with zero duty access to Chinese market to 8,256. You said: "The Maldivian Government leased out Islands of Feydhoo Finolhuto China until 2066 for $4 million." The islands are leased for Chinese companies to develop into a tourist resort. According to Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, the Feydhoo Finolhu resort appears largely complete as of August 2020, but the wharf is modest and seems intended for civilian vessels, presumably ferrying guests who fly in to nearby Male. Small villas line the shore all around the island, while the only larger buildings are the small cluster near the harbor. These are presumably the administrative buildings and shops for the resort. And dozens of bungalows line piers over the reef itself. The island has even been planted with small groves of palm trees. And there is very little room left to build anything else, whether civilian or military. All in all, Feydhoo Finolhu has every indication of being a commercial resort. And in 2066, the 50-year lease would expire, the Feydhoo Finolhu island would be returned to Maldives. So doesn't Maldives stand to benefit in the long run? You said: "Sri Lanka meltdown exposes China loan policy" I already pointed out that China only makes up 10% of Sri Lanka's foreign debt, the remaining 90% comes mostly from the West, Japan and India, yet you're blaming China for Sri Lanka's woes?
    2
  12309. The Yellow Peril mindset never truly died out in the West, it just changed target from Japan to China.
    2
  12310.  @xerozero976  Do you have actual evidence of their corruption? I gave you examples of China's anti-corruption crackdown, you just dismiss my points as ridiculous that's all. And when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign, but after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    2
  12311.  @xerozero976  You said 744,000 people were displaced, and 63.46 million were affected, but where did you get your bloated figure of 53 million homeless? You clearly said 53million homeless, so where does it say that the people affected are homeless, you tell me?
    2
  12312. China has around 7% arable land, yet China can support 20% of the world's population.
    2
  12313.  @valuedcustomer8922  You're not even Chinese yourself, what'd you care about people living in China?
    2
  12314.  @GMK189-f2k  U.S's military expenditure is more than the next seven countries combined!
    2
  12315.  @MH-il1lk  You said: "You are quoting a man who uses "Let's say," "most people," without scientific evidence." Those words have to be taken in context. He uses "Let's say" to refer to the top 2% of people (i.e the geniuses) and even there, China enjoys a 4.3 to 1 advantage. He uses "most people" to refer to the fact that majority of people are average and fall within the center of the bell curve. Please read the article again carefully.
    2
  12316. Unfortunately, Indonesia's welcoming of Russia might face the same possible reaction from NATO countries, as China is now facing. Hopefully Indonesia won't bow and back down in its chosen stance, just like China, against Western pressure.
    2
  12317. @Al Castill Previously, Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region used to be plagued by terrorist attacks perpetrated by misguided Ughurs such as the 1992 Ürümqi bombings, the 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings, the 2010 Aksu bombing, the 2011 Hotan attack, 2011 Kashgar attacks, and the 2014 Ürümqi attack Source: 1992 Ürümqi bombings wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_bombings Source: 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings wikipedia.org/wiki/1997_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_bus_bombings Source: 2010 Aksu bombing wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Aksu_bombing Source: 2011 Hotan attack wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Hotan_attack Source: 2011 Kashgar attacks wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Kashgar_attacks Source: April 2014 Ürümqi attack wikipedia.org/wiki/April_2014_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_attack But thanks to the government program in Xinjiang, there have been no more terrorist attacks in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region since.
    2
  12318. @Al Castel Hong Kong literally held more elections AFTER the 1997 handover back to mainland China, than they ever did for 150 years as a British colony. Besides, the Sino-British Declaration will expire 50 years after the 1997 handover. So if you fast forward to 2047, Hong Kong will eventually be fully returned back to China and be under the rule of the Communist Party of China anyway in the future. I mean, shouldn't a part of a country be under the control of the country's government? That's the case in most countries, China is the only country that allows multiple political systems (Hong Kong's democratic government and the mainland's Communist government) to exist within our borders.
    2
  12319.  S W  As of June 2020, 226 of the world’s 500 most powerful supercomputers were located in China, a figure which doubled that of its nearest competitor, the United States, which accounted for an additional 113 supercomputers. Source: Number of top 500 supercomputers worldwide 2019-2020, by country statista.com/statistics/264445/number-of-supercomputers-worldwide-by-country/
    2
  12320. Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors (just ask the expats here). However, many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly treating Chinese in their lands as unwelcome.
    2
  12321.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou RT was horrendously bias. Reporting non existant shelling," Didn't you see those ruined houses in Donbas and the death bodies of civilians living in those regions? The figure of 14,000 killed over the cost of 8 years in Donbas comes from UN sources and from the Ukrainian government themselves, so what makes you think those shelling are non-existent? You said: "I try to get both sides. The Russian side is just pure propaganda. In my opinion while certain Chinese media is very biased others aren't and are more of a mix." Since you considered Russian and Chinese media, have you also considered the opinion that perhaps the Western MSM like CNN, BBC, etc are biased towards Russia and China as well? Just look at Western MSM coverage of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and there's no opinion being presented from the Russian perspective and providing a fair balance to understanding the conflict from both sides. The EU banning RT will further exacerbate this imbalance of views. I recommend watching some Ukrainian documentaries like Oliver Stone's 2016 Ukraine on Fire documentary, and also John Mearsheimer's Why is Ukraine the West's Fault? here on YouTube. They touch on the history and the rise of fascist/ultra-nationalist/neo-Nazi movements in Ukraine, the 2014 coup d'etat in Ukraine ousting Yanukovych and the U.S and NATO installing their own pro-Washington government in Ukraine.
    2
  12322.  @stunningandbrave2520  Tsai Eng Wen actually resigned after her party's poor showing in the last elections. Whereas Kuomintang (KMT) won several major races, including in the capital Taipei. Time will tell in the next Taiwan election (in 2024) if KMT or DPP will win.
    2
  12323. Over 50 years ago, nobody thought that China would ever be successful, nor play an important role in global politics, yet look at where China is today.
    2
  12324.  @lyhthegreat  "神州 Shenzhou china did tried to cover up the existence of the virus...the doc who sounded out got silenced by the ccp." Which doctor are you referring to?
    2
  12325.  @lydiawhite8320  "they have an old map that show some part you called China Sea belong to Philippines which now called West Philippines Sea." Lol, not only I call it the South China Sea but the rest of the world does. The so-called West Philippine Sea is not the internationally recognized name for the region. The sea is know internationally as the South China Sea, so why are you trying to make it sound like I'm using incorrect nomenclature?
    2
  12326. Westerners don't understand how Asian politics work. If China truly surrounded by enemies, then why China's largest trading partners apart from USA, are Japan, South Korea and ROC (Taiwan)? Japan and Korea have seen many Chinese tourists and China has seen many Korean and Japanese tourists as well. Largest Trading Partners of China en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_trading_partners_of_China Tourism in South Korea en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourism_in_South_Korea Tourism in Japan en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourism_in_Japan Tourism in China en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourism_in_China With such strong links to each other, our countries are extremely unlikely to go to war with each other, with the sheer amount of businesses and tourists located in each other countries respectively.
    2
  12327.  @jp95js  But why do you call the Chinese Communist Party when it has the name Zhongguo 中国 "China"? I mean, you call it the United States of America, not the American United States, so why don't you do the same for the Communist Party of China?
    2
  12328.  @jp95js  Because WHO's Phase Two wants to investigate previously investigated sectors like the Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market, as well as the Wuhan Institute of Virology and ignore the results of the Phase One investigation, that's why China rejected a 2nd phase study, when they ignore the results of the 1st phase. China is the only country to have undergone WHO Covid-19 origins investigation, no other country has had WHO investigated their countries for the possible origins of the coronavirus, despite other leads, like Barcelona sewers having traces of Covid19 before Wuhan outbreak, or the U.S mysterious vaping illness and possibly Fort Detrick. If U.S was truly uninvolved, then an WHO investigation into Fort Detrick would help dispel rumors and clear the U.S's name. Unless the U.S has something to hid.
    2
  12329.  @hyc1266  Yes, some Americans have even eaten roadkill.
    2
  12330.  @jp95js  In Vietnam, it's Communist Party of Vietnam. -In Cuba, it's Communist Party of Cuba. -In North Korea, it's the Worker's Party of Korea. (different name, but the format is the same). -In Venezuela, it's Communist Party of Venezuela. -In the former Soviet Union, it's the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. -In former West Germany, it's the Communist Party of Germany. -In Australia, it's the Communist Party of Australia. -In Canada, it's the Communist Party of Canada. -In Britain, it's the Communist Party of Britain. -In the USA, it's the Communist Party USA. ... Yet why is it when it comes to China, suddenly you claim it's the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) instead of the Communist Party of China (CPC)?
    2
  12331.  @repardation7409  "神州 Shenzhou CCP was the name they gave themselves, until a few years go." If what you say is true, then perhaps the Chinese to English translation was inaccurate. The more accurate translation is Communist Party of China (CPC) because the name Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) has Zhōngguó (中国) "China" inside.
    2
  12332.  @MarkYeung1  "is that why Taiwan enjoys 3 times more Gdp than mainland?" Mainland China's GDP is $14.72 trillion, Taiwan's GDP is $689 billion so how is Taiwan's GDP 3 times more than the mainland?
    2
  12333.  @repardation7409  "神州 Shenzhou This list is *completely wrong:*" You literally shown that some communist party names were correct then aren't you contradicting your own statement that my list is completely wrong? Secondly, none of your corrected names indicate a departure from the usual naming convention of "communist/socialist party of X". The Communist Party of Korea (Korean: 조선공산당; Hanja: 朝鮮共產黨; MR: Chosŏn Kongsandang) was a communist party in Korea in 1925 and the naming convention remains the same, so the Communist Party of China (中国共产党) should be the same isn't it?
    2
  12334.  @doflamingo8366  Honestly speaking, I've heard many Filipinos complaining online about Chinese businessmen taking over their businesses in the Philippines, but hardly any mention of U.S privatizing their lands. I'm glad to at least hear from you an example of a Filipino recognizing U.S interference in their politics.
    2
  12335.  @cokezzz8249  Why are you bringing up events from over 30 years ago?
    2
  12336.  @matpk  About China's leader for life, China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US short term leadership.
    2
  12337.  @MarkYeung1  So the US has a National Security Law, then why can't Hong Kong have National Security Law as well? It's actually written in Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 (香港基本法第二十三條) that Hong Kong shall enact laws to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government, or theft of state secrets, to prohibit foreign political organizations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region, and to prohibit political organizations or bodies of the Region from establishing ties with foreign political organizations or bodies
    2
  12338.  @MarkYeung1  In 1958, the Yellow River flood coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. The flood water level was so high that it rose up to the top of the levee in several places. This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. It was reported as the most severe flood since 1933.
    2
  12339.  @MarkYeung1  The fact that China has prospered far better than ever since 1989, already shows that China chose the right path then what "correction" needs to be made?
    2
  12340.  @albundy7991  You said: "Taiwan is the only living memory of what Chinese culture was.." What makes you think Chinese culture is destroyed? China has 5000 years of history and culture, and many historical structures like The Great Wall of China, the Forbidden City, The First Emperor's Tomb, the Terracotta Army, The Grand Canal (oldest and longest artificial river) are in the Chinese mainland, how is Taiwan the only living memory of what Chinese was? I mean, does Taiwan have the Great Wall of China in them? Then why do Westerners keep saying Taiwan has more Chinese culture than the mainland?
    2
  12341.  @michaelkatz275  Because U.S's Covid-19 response is about sacrificing lives to save businesses. Whereas China's Covid-19 response is about sacrificing businesses to save lives.
    2
  12342.  @Saurabh_Utter-Pradesh  Nehru's aggressive "Forward Policy" had 60 such outposts, including 43 outposts which were beyond the McMahon Line and in actual Chinese territory.
    2
  12343. There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    2
  12344.  @MarkYeung1  How is the Communist Party of China to blame for how Westerners treat Chinese abroad? Look at the rise in anti-Asian hate crimes being committed against people of Asian descent (i.e Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese etc) and these people aren't even communist party members themselves. In fact many of them haven't even been to China and yet some Westerners (but not all) are using this opportunity to take out their frustrations on Asians. China's rise will raise the reputation of Chinese abroad, but if Western MSM continually demonize China, then obviously the reputation of Chinese abroad will suffer.
    2
  12345. One disadvantage Russia faces, is that Chinese engineers know plenty about Russian military hardware (at least, the ones Russia sent over to China) but Russian engineers may not know the same about China's.
    2
  12346.  @luodeligesi7238  My analogy does not claim that the ex-husband wants the ex-wife to return to him. Putin has stated that Russia does not intend to occupy Ukraine. Many experts also believe that Russia couldn't occupy Ukraine if it wanted to. So the ex-husband paying off more than 200 billion in debts for her is not considered "accommodating"? And the thing is that when you're married, you share ownership of things. During USSR period, many Soviet soldiers have been deployed to Ukraine (the frontline of USSR facing NATO) and the Soviet military also stationed thousands of nuclear weapons on Ukrainian soil. When the USSR collapsed in 1991, Ukraine became the world's third‐​largest nuclear power almost overnight. The "children" were a clearly product of marriage, how'd you think Russians get into Eastern Ukraine? For example, Crimea was never a part of Ukraine history, it's because of the divorce that border lines were not properly drawn after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. And Russia never posed a threat to Ukraine after the USSR dissolution, but Ukraine dreams of marrying into the village bully's harem, even though it's apparent by now that the village chief was just using Ukraine to open up a path to her ex-husband's doorstep. The village chief and his many wives have no intention of ever allowing Ukraine to marry into their family, because that would mean they would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband.
    2
  12347.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  You said: "In his early days he would brag about Chinese weaponry and compare it to US weaponry.. Shenzhou is from the PLA." Early days? I've had this YouTube account since 2011, whereas your account was created in 2021, so how would you know what I wrote about in my early days? And do you actually have evidence that I am from the PLA to make such an accusation about me?
    2
  12348. ​ @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  I've never heard of ​Senior Sergeant Tom Croydon before, what are you talking about? And you accused me of being from the People's Liberation Army, well do you have actual proof to backup your claim?
    2
  12349.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  "神州 Shenzhou you've agreed to it in the past." When did I ever agreed to being from the PLA? Now you're just making accusations that you can't even support that's all.
    2
  12350. But you'll need an alternative, if you want to keep an equal distance from both. Isn't that how it works?
    2
  12351. @Huai Danny How does a man and woman getting divorced undermine my argument as being sexist? Are you suggesting that I should have made it a same-sex marriage? In virtually every part of the world, a man and woman getting married is regarded as the norm, and getting divorced is becoming increasingly accepted. It's almost as if you're unable to logically refute the analogy, so you just play the sexist card and label it misogynistic.
    2
  12352. @Huai Danny While those traits may be considered derogatory, but how is it sexist and misogynistic? Are you one of those Social Justice Warriors (SJWs) who pounce onto anything regarding politically incorrect and label them as misogynistic and so on? That you're unable to refute my point logically so you resort to calling it sexist?
    2
  12353. @Huai Danny You said: "Some people in the West are capitalising on this analogy to promote their gender politics... I wholeheartedly agree. It's cynical and completely misses the point." You wholeheartedly agree, yet here you are literally joining them by imposing your own gender politics onto the analogy yourself. Yet you claim you're not "one of those SJWs" when your behavior matches exactly that of those SJWs criticizing anyone who says anything politically incorrect, do you see the hypocrisy of your own words? You said: "So why the hell are you feeding the d**n trolls?!" You know who's really feeding the trolls here? It's the one who caves into their demands, and is forced to modify their analogy just because those trolls pounce on anything politically incorrect. I'm not feeding those trolls, I still stand by the analogy itself, because this is how you show defiance in the face of the PC trolls and SJWs. Modifying the analogy is literally waving a white flag in surrender to demands of those trolls, wouldn't you agree? You said: "Okay, buddy. Good luck with whatever it is you think you're accomplishing." I'm just giving an analogy here for crying out loud. A story to help ordinary people relate better to the Russo-Ukraine crisis in the form of a family drama. That's what I'm trying to accomplish You said: "But please don't fool yourself into thinking it's about geopolitical clarity or international understanding. It ain't." The meaning behind the story is evident, I'm sure everyone understands it on a fundamental level, and that's why you're apparently unable to criticize the accuracy of the dynamics in the analogy. The only thing you can critique is the so-called "sexist" nature of the analogy, but that doesn't change the fact that the analogy speaks for itself. You're literally imitating the behavior of those trolls and SJWs that you despise, by imposing your own gender politics into the analogy and avoiding the point that the analogy is making.
    2
  12354. @Huai Danny You said: "But, no... you want to dig your heels in because you're apparently too lazy (or perhaps too unimaginative) to come up with a less incendiary analogy. Pathetic." More insults. Here's another analogy taken off Weibo to explain Russia's behavior: Before I went to sleep, my wife on Douyin was complaining to me: "This Russia is such a bad country. If Ukraine wants to join NATO, it is their business and freedom, Russia has no right to intervene. This is just an excuse for Russia to invade Ukraine." I said nothing, got out of bed and went to the kitchen, before returning to bed with knife in my hand. I told my wife: "Let's go to sleep." Upon seeing the knife, my wife sat up abruptly in bed and looked at me with wide eyes. "What are you doing? Sleeping with a knife?!" she exclaimed. I replied: "Don’t worry about it, let’s go to sleep. Besides, me sleeping with a knife is none of your business and it is my freedom." My wife said: "You're crazy! How can I sleep when you are lying next to me with a knife? What if you accidentally cut me?" I replied: “Well, you don’t even trust your own husband, how can you expect Russia to trust Ukraine? Sleeping with a knife is like Ukraine joining the NATO." .... (End of analogy) .... So are you going to impose your gender politics into this analogy as well?
    2
  12355.  @ladodah  Well, then it appears we are both in agreement that Chairman Mao didn't murder those people, they starved to death as result of the Great Chinese Famine. It was bad weather conditions like the 1958 Yellow River flood, that caused destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvests and mass starvation. As for the falsified data, I've made it clear that it was local provincial governments that grossly exaggerated crop yields to Mao when he inspected the fields, and the locals even transplanted healthy crops from dying fields to healthy fields, to give the illusion of a bumper harvest, that's why Mao thought there was sufficient grain to export. Then how is Mao the cause of the famine, when the provincial government duped him with bloated figures of crop yield? I read your last paragraph that you quoted from Wikipedia, and while yes, there's man-made errors, but there's no claim that Mao was the cause of the famine like you claimed earlier.
    2
  12356.  @putianren  I just hope you open your eyes to the apparent discrimination in your words against Americans (as a people). We shouldn't discriminate against people's race/nationality like American, Russian, Chinese, etc. Yes, I'm a little disappointed with Cyrus because he bought into that whole "Xi Jinping needs to secure his 3rd term" narrative, but that's not because of his nationality as an American.
    2
  12357.  @chowcheebai1139  You're from Hamburg? From your name, I had initially thought that you were from Singapore.
    2
  12358. Thailand was never historically colonized, so I thought Thai people are immune to the "colonial mentality" that plagues the people of former colonies. Like when British India made Indian troops fight in WWII against the Nazis and die for Anglo-Saxon wars, this appears to be the same thing that those Thai are doing, by going to fight for Ukraine.
    2
  12359.  @addminustraitor8514  Prophet Muhammad married Aisha when she was six, and had sexual intercourse with her while she still remained pre-pubescent at the age of nine lunar years. This fact has been recorded many times in Sahih ahadith. Source: Pedophilia in the Qur'an https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Pedophilia_in_the_Qur%27an So why can't Chinese government remove all the extremist elements from Islamic teachings and stop the Uighurs from following down the path of Islam radicalism? Uighurs weren't even originally Musims in the first place, they had their own traditional Uighur culture before the Islamic invaders conquered Xinjiang and converted the natives to Islam.
    2
  12360.  @jigsaw5976  As long as Chinese government teaches a version of the Koran that has all the "extremist elements" removed from the Koran, then I don't mind not having read the Koran itself. Look at the West, and they just let Muslims do whatever they want, and that's why so many extremist arise and then migrate to join the terrorists. It is estimated that around 4,000 people have left their homes in the West to migrate to ISIS. Many have become jihadist fighters in the apparent hope of achieving martyrdom. Source: Why Are Westerners Attracted to ISIS? theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/07/isis-foreign-fighters-political-pilgrims/399209/ If through re-education, Chinese government can stop these Uighur extremists from joining the terrorist's causes and provide free education to these Uighurs and training in job-skills to prepare them for the workforce, then the government is doing a good deed, reforming these extremists or potential extremists into productive members of society.
    2
  12361.  @ericferguson9989  You're saying Mao killed 60 billion people, but it was during Chinese Civil War, so of course, Chinese were killing Chinese. Just like in American Civil War, Americans killed Americans. Or Vietnamese killing Vietnamese in Vietnam War. Or Koreans in Korean war. Or any civil war for that matter.
    2
  12362. Chinese people tend to be nationalistic yes, but you can also hear American patriotic slogans like "America First", "Make America Great Again" and "God Bless the U.S.A." If I was American, I too would probably swell with pride on hearing those words.
    2
  12363.  @TheFivegoodemperors  That's because no other country has as many outbound tourists as China. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are also positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more That's why you can't find any other example of other countries with foreign police exchange to help with translation, because there just aren't enough tourists. For example, how many Italian tourists are there actually in the USA/UK? Enough to justify having Italian police on exchange in USA/UK? And what makes you think if US/UK police were sent to China, that they would be labelled as foreign imperialist spies and killed by a mob? Which foreigner has been mobbed in China?
    2
  12364.  @TheFivegoodemperors  That's probably because Germans, Americans and French tourists in Italy can always communicate using a common language like English. However, many Chinese tourists still struggle with English even till today, so Chinese police officers can help assist Italian officers in language barrier issues, involving Chinese tourists, international students, etc. How does my arguments not make sense? China is still the world's largest source of outbound tourists and international students as I mentioned before.
    2
  12365.  @TheFivegoodemperors  Even if you're not talking about English, the fact remains that Mandarin Chinese is the world's most spoken language by number of speakers, regardless of quiche other language you compare it to. And what if learning a few basic phrases are insufficient to explain the issue involving Chinese tourists? Much better to have Chinese police officers on hand to better explain differences in countries laws. I mean, you're not even Italian yourself and if the Italians are okay with Chinese police officers then what concern is it of yours over Sino-Italian relations? Is it because you can't stand to see China built up better relationships with European countries?
    2
  12366.  @TheFivegoodemperors  Did you watch the uploader's video? Only 10 Chinese officers were sent to Italy for 3 weeks, to help with the peak season in Italy for Chinese tourists, so is this really that much of a drain of officers and resources? Chinese police may have official authority, but I'm not entirely sure about this program, perhaps the Italian officers can temporarily confer authority onto Chinese officers to help deal with Chinese tourists during the peak season. Nobody said that Chinese officers only helps tourists from China, they can also assist Italian police to deal with people from other countries, say for example, overseas Chinese such as Chinese Americans, Chinese Singaporeans, Chinese Malaysians, Chinese Europeans, etc. We Chinese make up 20% of the world's population after all. Europe is growing closer to China, but other Western countries like America, Canada and Australia aren't though. And you personally seem to be against Sino-Italian relations, since you've been nothing if but extremely negative so far, so it looked as though you were against China growing relations with Europe. Have you heard of the Belt and Road Initiative? An overland route meant to connect China with Europe and bring development to all those landlocked countries in between?
    2
  12367. China wants to make Asia strong through the Belt and Road Initiative, by building infrastructure in developing countries like Pakistan, Kazakhstan, other -stan countries, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Maldives, etc. China has always welcome India to come onboard the BRI to share in the mutual progress and prosperity. But even if New Delhi rejects this offer, Beijing will respect New Delhi's decision.
    2
  12368. Criminal? He's literally the founding father of the People's Republic of China, and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country, where even the previous Republic of China (1912-1949) failed to achieve for 37 years.
    2
  12369. He's literally the People's Republic of China's founding father, and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country, where even the previous Republic of China (1912-1949) failed to achieve for 37 years. If not for Mao, China today would most likely still be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the unified country we are today.
    2
  12370.  @VeenSauce  said "Mainland china will always struggle to be as innovative with a boot on its people's back." As the world's most populous country, statistically speaking, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to carry out said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large Populations Have More Geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Taken from the above: Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    2
  12371. As of 2015, China is the 4th most visited country in the world, after France, United States, and Spain, with 56.9 million international tourists per year, so why claim nobody likes China? Chinese workers work hard to make all your computer products, your smartphones, your electronics, your appliances, toys, clothing, sneakers, etc, at affordable prices, so that inflation in your countries is kept low, and the cost of living is lower than it should be. Think of the millions of dollars people in other countries have saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. For example, why do you Americans love Walmart for their prices?
    2
  12372. +Brett Demauna Pollution is a problem in China, but China is tackling this problem by planning to ban coal power plants and also non-electric vehicles. Already in 2017, China sold more electric cars than Western countries. Source:Wikipedia:Electric car use by countries
    2
  12373. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country (since our last major war in 1979) but this does not mean China is weak. If you treat China as the enemy, then likewise, China will treat you like one as well. If you threaten our homes and loved ones, we will fight back to protect our sovereignty
    2
  12374. Donald Trump wasn't the cause, he's a symptom of American dissatisfaction. As much as you try to singularly pin the blame on him, Trump did not start any new wars while he was in power, and Trump was interested in making deals with other world leaders.
    2
  12375. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  12376. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    2
  12377. Censorship exists because Words can mislead and incite riots, like Trump's tweets leading to January 6th Capitol Hill riots in Washington, until even Facebook, Instagram, Twitter banned Trump's social media accounts. And that's even while Trump was still technically POTUS at that time. In China, the government controls the media, but in USA the social media websites can ban the POTUS social media account. That's the amount of power that US corporations wield.
    2
  12378.  @everythingandmore5537  It's no secret today that Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are too efficient, we can theoretically produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the planet. Yet we still have starvation, homelessness, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, because under capitalism, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." The Earth's resources are finite and capitalism seeks to exhaust them, communism is dedicated to distributing resources according to needs.
    2
  12379. Majority of these Hong Kong protestors are high school kids, haven't even graduated school, yet they think they know how to best govern Hong Kong? Their teenage minds haven't matured, and they haven't stepped out into the real working world of adults, so what do they even know about real world politics? And they're quite organized and employ tactics, almost as if some foreign power is secretly training these idealistic teens and funding the Hong Kong protests from behind the scenes.
    2
  12380.  @wonjinum2258  The THAAD coverage doesn't even protect Seoul, the capital of South Korea, so why deploy THAAD then, if not to make a political statement against China then? THAAD is like a long-range spyglass (for USA) to peer deep into Chinese territory that's why China is against THAAD deployment in S. Korea. And what Chinese defense/spying systems close to our neighboring countries are you talking about?
    2
  12381.  Beast Mode  "Apple has stated on the news today that they are going to find somewhere else to do manufacturing." That means the cost of Apple's new iPhones are going to increase, unless those new workers can compete with the wages of Chinese workers. The quality won't be the same as the current quality by Made-in-China iPhones.
    2
  12382. The American Dream is about how poor immigrants to America can hopefully strike it rich one day, and move up the social ladder to a higher rung. That's why they allow virtually any immigrant into the country. The Chinese Dream is the eventual rejuvenation of our nation, and for that, China needs what's called "human capital", such as scientists, researchers, businessmen, entrepreneurs, and people who actually contribute back to China. That's why our immigration laws tend to be stricter.
    2
  12383.  @inkbold8511  Agreed. Before Nixon's 1972 visit to China, there was virtually no communications or diplomatic ties between USA and China as back then the U.S did not recognize PRC 🇨🇳 as China, instead they recognize ROC 🇹🇼 in Taiwan as China. During the Great Chinese Famine, Mao Zedong was unable to import food from countries like Australia, because the U.S placed embargo against China.
    2
  12384.  @The5thBranch  Since there's currently no PLA troop buildup at the border with Taiwan in the Taiwan Strait (unlike the Russian troop buildup at its border with Ukraine) then why'd you claim earlier that President Xi is preparing to attack Taiwan? There's no evidence to suggest an impending attack on Taiwan by the mainland.
    2
  12385.  User 01  Even though many former colonies have been physically decolonised, but for many of the locals the "decolonization of the mind" still needs to take place. I recommend this definition of decolonization of the mind by Dr. Tone Rawlings. Decolonizing the mind = the act of recognizing the methods of colonization, of understanding that our every decisions are influenced by our colonized mindsets, and of tracking the colonized operating system to transmute self-limiting stories into a gateway to liberation. It’s the journey of why, how, and with what your heart and mind has been colonized. It enables you to be present and recognize the colonizer’s ideas in the moment. It is a developing of a witness to the trauma programming. It is a developing of a process to question your actions/reactions and to reframe past memories so that one can release the strangle of trauma and self-limiting stories that keeps us trapped reliving the past and keeps us from authentic creation of a future. - Dr Tone Rawlings. More Indians need to recognise the symptoms of the colonial mindset if India wants to truly break free of its colonial past.
    2
  12386.  @The5thBranch  I already know the answer to the question I posed to you and I have answered it myself. There is currently no PLA troop buildup at the Taiwan Strait (unlike the Russian troop buildup at its border with Ukraine) so there's no evidence of an impending attack on Taiwan by President Xi.
    2
  12387.  @The5thBranch  "神州 Shenzhou 39 fighter planes incursions into Taiwan Safe Zone airspace 3 weeks ago." Those PLA Airforce fighters flew in international airspace not into the actual airspace over Taiwan island. Taiwan's air defense identification zone (ADIZ) actually extends into the mainland, but the concept of an ADIZ is not defined in any international treaty and is not regulated by any international body. Also, if you follow the flightpath of those PLAAF fighters, they flew closer to mainland China than Taiwan island, so again, how is this evidence of an impending attack on Taiwan by President Xi?
    2
  12388.  @quekjoseph836  Since you acknowledged that China have our law and Canada have theirs then why can't China deal with the two Canadians under Chinese law? You don't really care about those Canadians anyway, and they were arrested after Meng was detained in Vancouver, so Canada started this whole mess to begin with and they know exactly how to resolve this stalemate. And with regards to Canadian law in Canada, Meng had her rights violated, her smartphone and devices were confiscated by Canadian border authorities and the contents searched illegally. She wasn't allowed to speak to her travelling companion nor was she allowed to call her lawyer for advice at the airport, so it's actually Canadian border authorities that's violating their own laws in their territory. Source: Meng's 'rights were violated' by border services: Botting garybotting.com/publications/articles/dr--gary-botting-mengs-rights-were-violated-by-border-services-botting
    2
  12389.  @yslee1401  50 km is quite a distance, why do you keep on bring up the distance?
    2
  12390.  @NathanielTanFL  President Trump? Didn't he almost start a fresh war with Iran? After the Saudi Arabia oil attack?
    2
  12391.  @teresabaker-carl9668  Good news for America then, if Trump has so far avoided war with Iran. But what happens when Iran makes another push again? The Iran Supreme Leader appears to to see American lack of action against it as a possible sign of US weakness, and may decide to make another move again. Who knows? Not that I support war by the way. And this whole fiasco with US and Iran started because Trump pulled out of the Iran Nuclear Deal in the first place, and started imposing sanctions against Iran.
    2
  12392.    "modern China is only 70 years old, still too immature on a political level." Immature? China has a wealth of political experience to draw upon, from political literature, military textbooks and governing manuals. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    2
  12393.  @hmong_keeb_kwm  The thing is, should we take this Chinese unity for granted? Now that China is rising again, outside forces are trying to sow disunity among Chinese, whether its among the Tibetans, the Uighurs or through the Hong Kong protests. Our 5000 year old Chinese civilisation (which has survived long after the Mesopotamian, Egyptian Empire and Roman Empire have crumbled) always prioritise internal stability over all other threats. A country is strong if unified and weak if divided and fighting among ourselves, and there are foreign powers who would love to see China crumble and fracture into several different countries. Society is being held together because Chinese people believe in One China, that's how China has survived over the violent course of time to modern times relatively intact.
    2
  12394. Arguably Tibetans in China today enjoy better life than their counterparts outside of China. Located in Himalayas, Tibet mostly isolated from rest of the world throughout history, but thanks to Qinghai railway built by Chinese through difficult mountainous terrain, Tibet is accessible to rest of world and growing tourism industry has sprung up in Tibet. Growing food in Tibet very difficult since the mountain soil is poor and low rainfall, so the government introduced greenhouses to Tibet to increase agricultural yield. Of course Tibet suffered during Cultural Revolution but so did the rest of China and afterwards, the government has helped rebuild many Tibetan temples that were destroyed during the revolution. Many modern amenities like roads, streetlamps, schools and universities were built to modernize Tibet and Tibetans today can enjoy access to water, electricity, gas, plumbing and electronics like smartphones, computers and Internet access. Thanks to convenience of Internet, Tibetans today can browse websites, shop online and have purchases delivered to Tibet, because it is part of China after all. So for above reasons my opinion is that Tibetans today enjoy better standard of life than they did before.
    2
  12395. Innermost dishonorabu dishspray
    2
  12396. China today is hardly considered communist. In fact, its said that China is more capitalist than even some Western countries.
    2
  12397.  @zackk4969  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"?
    2
  12398.  @zackk4969  What genocide in Xinjiang? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    2
  12399.  @zackk4969  The Population of Uighurs in China actually tripled in size from 3 million (1953) to 10 million Uighurs (2010) so again, what genocide are you talking about?
    2
  12400.  @jayztv3345  Taiwan also shares the claim that the South China Sea Islands are part of China.
    2
  12401.  @AvanguardInvinsible3740  Philippines intentionally grounded a ship on the Second Thomas Shoal. China offered to help repair the damaged vessel and get it back to the sea, but Philippines refused and instead they send supply ships to reinforce the decaying hull of the BRP Sierra Madre, how's this not stealing territory?
    2
  12402.  @mathewg5884  Second Thomas Shoal has no artificial islands, what are you talking about?
    2
  12403.  @wlakongpake  Looks like you're the one living in imagination land, since you can't refute any of my previous points.
    2
  12404.  @mathewg5884  The simple fact that Philippines had to intentionally crash and park a rusty ship there just goes to show that it's not Philippine territory.
    2
  12405.  @wlakongpake  Still stuck in imagination land? Why don't you comment on the rusty ship that the Philippines intentionally parked and is reinforcing with supply ships?
    2
  12406.  @Filipinoshospitality  Where's your old map?
    2
  12407.  @wlakongpake  So that rusty ship is imagined by China? Why is Philippines sending supply ships to reinforce the rusting hull of the Sierra Madre?
    2
  12408.  @nixtrope  I quote sources to support my argument, you can't refute my points so you resort to hurling personal insults against me?
    2
  12409.  @dextercadelina7953  Republic of China (now Taiwan) first drew up the 11 Dash Line in 1947. Even the USA acknowledged the 11 Dash Line, and the Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence in 1946 that the Spratlys was not Philippine territory, both to not anger Chiang Kai-shek in China and because the Spratlys were not part of the Philippines per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America.
    2
  12410.  @JuliaInes-bp8mf  In 1999, Philippine president Joseph Estrada promised that the grounded vessel would be towed away. In 2014, the Chinese government asked the Philippines to remove the grounded ship. In 2017, China and the Philippines established a gentlemen's agreement that the status quo be maintained for the South China Sea, as both sides tried to strengthen their relations. Under the status quo agreement, no construction materials are allowed to fortify the Sierra Madre. But the Philippines has violated this agreement and sent supply ships to reinforce the rusting hull of the grounded vessel.
    2
  12411.  @JuliaInes-bp8mf  Regarding the 9-Dash Line, the Vietnam PM Pham van Dong had formally accepted that the Spratly and Paracel Islands as within Chinese territorial waters in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. (Source: Wikipedia: File: 1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai)
    2
  12412.  @nixtrope  You stand for the Philippines, then can't I stand for China? You've been calling it the "West Philippine Sea" but that's not the internationally recognized name for the sea. The region is known internationally as the South China Sea. As for territorial waters, the 1898 Treaty of Paris marked out Philippine's maritime boundary and they did not include the South China Sea as within Philippine boundary.
    2
  12413.  @nixtrope  What's the name of the 2016 arbitral tribunal? You're constantly calling me a bot, when you can't even give the actual name of the organization that made the ruling?
    2
  12414.  @BatAskal  "Shenzhou. Where were you in Hague in 2016 to explain that again?" In 2012, the Philippines had signed a Code of Conduct on the South China Sea to resolve territorial disputes through friendly consultations and negotiations by sovereign states, but by bring the matter to the Hague, Philippines had violated the code of conduct by involving 3rd party arbitration.
    2
  12415.  @BatAskal  Philippines violated the Code of Conduct, and now you're accusing China of violating it? Philippines choose not to settle the territorial dispute bilaterally, instead choosing 3rd party arbitration then China has the right to refuse arbitration. In 2006, China made a declaration in accordance with Article 298 of Section 3 of Part XV of UNCLOS not to allow the convention to rule over matters of sovereignty. Many countries including the United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, France, Canada, and Spain had made similar declarations so China is not alone in refusing 3rd party arbitration.
    2
  12416.  @dextercadelina7953  In 1999, Philppines president Joseph Estrada promised that the grounded vessel would be towed away. In 2014, the Chinese government asked the Philippines to remove the grounded ship. In 2017, China and the Philippines established a gentlemen's agreement that the status quo be maintained for the South China Sea, as both sides tried to strengthen their relations. Under the status quo agreement, no construction materials are allowed to fortify the Sierra Madre. But the Philippines went against this agreement and sent supply ships to reinforce the rusting hull of the grounded vessel.
    2
  12417.  @IanpaulParanga  "1734 maurillo velarde map that's the map that wins against china. Imagine 1734 against 1947 of china. Fact vs. imagination." 1734 Maurillo Velarde Map was drawn up by the Spanish for the Philippines. Drawn by foreigners who had no knowledge of local geography and political boundaries, so how's that a concrete claim? Being colonizers, of course the Spanish would try and incorporate more territory into their colony, whereas the 9-Dash Line was drawn up by local Chinese who lived in the region.
    2
  12418.  @alucard6675  Pag Asa Island (Thitu Island) was inhabited by fishermen from Champa in present-day Vietnam and the Chinese, not the Philippines. After the Japanese WW2 surrender, the island was returned to Republic of China, and Chinese officials placed national markers on the major islands, drew up detailed maps of them, renamed them, and published the Location Map of the South China Sea Island. But in 1971 there was a typhoon so the Chinese garrisons withdraw to Taiping Island to avoid the storm. The Philippines saw this empty space and organized the troops to land on the island on 29 July and renamed the island "Pag-asa Island". So the Island was originally Chinese before it was seized by the Philippines after a storm.
    2
  12419. The state governments literally have to bid among themselves for limited medical supplies.
    2
  12420.  GEO NEO  During the Korean War, the People's Liberation Army were mostly dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving peasants. Their supply lines were overstretched, there was no air support and they only had North Korean soldiers for allies. Whereas South Korea had the support of United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, France, Greece and 10 other countries. They had superior weapons, adequate air support and with Japan nearby providing logistical support. Yet those 16 nations still did not win the Korean War against the PLA? With our overstretched supply lines, lack of air support and with only North Korean soldiers for allies?
    2
  12421.  @yuanfangli9272  You said: "However, China does not have an army, only the CCP army, so this is a problem, a big problem." Why is having the People's Liberation Army being loyal to the Communist Party of China a problem, a big problem? Look at Myanmar having military coup where the army overthrew the government and plunge Myammar into chaos and civil strife, and do you want the same thing to happen to China, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country?
    2
  12422.  @hectoOut  "On the other hand Chinese immigrants move to America and would be treated as fair and equal." The Chinese Exclusion Act literally barred Chinese immigrants from attaining Chinese citizenship in the United States.
    2
  12423.  @hectoOut  Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, even Taiwan's own constitution states that Taiwan is part of China. According to their constitution, Taiwan claims all of mainland China (incl. Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, etc) as part of their territory, as well as intersecting territorial claims with Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Taiwan can claim all of mainland China, then can't the mainland also claim Taiwan? Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. You said: "Your pet project in Ukraine is a big failure that you cannot talk with people using a big stick." What pet project in Ukraine? China is friends with both Ukraine and Russia. China is sending humanitarian aid to Ukraine, as well as continuing to do business in Russia, so what pet project are you talking about?
    2
  12424.  @sreeniv09  China has settled boundary dispute approximately of 20,000 km with 12 countries out of the 22,000 km and is yet to settle about 2,000 km of boundary involving India and Bhutan. -In 1961, Nepal and China signed border agreement. -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1991, USSR and China signed Sino-Soviet border agreement. -In 1992, Laos and China signed border agreement. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border agreement. -In 2011, Tajikistan ratified a 1999 deal to cede 1,000 km2 of land to China and China also cede over 28,000 km2 of Tajikistani territory. China has 21 talks with Bhutan and 19 talks with India but still fail to settle our countries borders.
    2
  12425.  @sreeniv09  You said: "Boundry disputes are not settled I think more disputes are created recently also with their friendly countries like Australia , US etc." Which boundary dispute does China have with Australia and the U.S?
    2
  12426. The unfortunate thing is that the term Wolf Warrior has become a derogatory term used by the West towards Chinese diplomats. Many in the West probably never even watched the movie themselves.
    2
  12427. China invented the paper banknote, now China is revolutionising digital currency, and one day in the future, the digital Renminbi might topple the US Dollar.
    2
  12428.  @fireiron369  "due to nothing having changed since the time of Mao... and historically what I’m saying has been the case for the past 70 years." Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself? China has changed drastically since Chairman Mao era, yet why do you seem to think China is still stuck in the past 70 years?
    2
  12429.  @fireiron369  "神州 Shenzhou I meant politically not economically." Politically, the Communist Party of China has undergone many reforms, such as changes to the 1-Child Policy to 2-Child and now 3-Child Policy. Between 1982 and 2018, the constitution stipulated that the president could not serve more than two consecutive terms and in 2018, presidential term limits were abolished. The Chinese constitution has also been amended to enshrine Xi Jinping Thought, it goes to show that reforms are ongoing within China's political system.
    2
  12430.  @LouisTsuiful  当别人看到咱们的同话，就觉得咱们是BOT，你懂不懂？
    2
  12431.  @LouisTsuiful  但你说的话和我是一模一样，所以那些外国人都以为咱们是BOT就违背目的了。
    2
  12432. ​ @LouisTsuiful  老实说如果你想你的英文进步，那你要敢干写出英文话哦，要对你自己的话有自信。
    2
  12433.  @dougm9759  Love your comment!
    2
  12434.  @buckygoldstein9256  If you can boast about Taiwan surpassing PRC in technology, then can't I bring up mainland China's tech prowess? China has even launched people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft, making China the 3rd country in the world to independently send humans into space. But has Taiwan launched anyone into space independently? You said: "You were claiming that the world didn't recognize Taiwan because China could provide products to the world better." Because that's true. In the past, Made-in-Taiwan products was commonplace, now it's been largely replaced by Made-in-China products. And isn't that not the reason why the world chooses to recognize Beijing over Taipei?
    2
  12435.  @buckygoldstein9256  You said: "神州 Shenzhou You can bring up what you want." About China's tech prowess, China even conducted our first extra-vehicular activity (EVA) where a Taikonaut (i.e Chinese Astronaut) exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into the vacuum of outer space (aka "spacewalk"). The Shenzhou 7 EVA made the Chinese space program the third in the world to have conducted an EVA other than the Soviet Union and the United States. Source: YouTube: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk Yet you boasted that Taiwan's technology has surpassed the PRC? Why hasn't Taiwan conducted any EVA of their own? You said: "I told you some bad things the US did and I asked you to come up with something the bad the PRC did." That I did. Didn't you read about the bad things I wrote about China previously? You said: "One would think you could have at least come up with the "Gang of Four", everyone knows about them." Likewise, one would think you could have at least come up with America's importing African slaves to pick cotton, or the genocide of Native Americans and occupation of their lands even till today. You said: "If you can't be truthful, you're not worth talking to." Excuse me, but who are you to tell me what to talk about? You never mentioned the American genocide of Native Americans either, then who are you to tell me what talk about? You said: "Chiang said that about communism being a disease of the heart." I believe Chiang was wrong when he said that. It's capitalism that seeks to shrink workers wages in order to skim off a higher profit margin. Capitalism doesn't care about American workers, they'll just as likely move their manufacturing base elsewhere to China or other low wage countries in order to maximise profits. Where is the "heart" in capitalism, you tell me? Communism is the belief that the means of production should be in the hands of the workers (i.e proletariat), which is a far more humane way to distribute wealth than to allow a few capitalists to control the means of production. I really don't understand what Chiang meant when he said it's a disease of the heart when communists are the ones fighting for the poor, the weak and those unable to fight for themselves.
    2
  12436.  @buckygoldstein9256  "神州 Shenzhou The "bad" things you listed weren't very bad." Arguably the same could be said of the "bad" things you listed for America. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it seems like the U.S is a threat to global peace and stability. You said: "Russia is suppose to be one of the 2 great super powers in the world and they have to get their electronics from China and the best they can send China is wood." Well, the same could be said of the United States, it's supposed to be the world's superpower, yet they have to get their electronics from Taiwan island so what's the big deal then? You said: "However, 4 private capitalist companies have also done that. SpaceX, Virgin Galactic, Blue Origin and Axiom Space. That doesn't make China's accomplishment any less notable. It just shows what capitalism can do." So while Amazon workers were struggling to keep their jobs, incurring injuries at twice the rate of its rivals, their efforts were what put Jeff Bezos into space? For what purpose exactly? Also, since you boasted that Taiwan's technology has surpassed that of the mainland, then why hasn't Taiwan sent anyone into space like the mainland?
    2
  12437.  @buckygoldstein9256  You said: "If the PRC wanted to be really great they would help their neighbors instead of threatening them." China is investing in many countries as well as building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, ports, airports in our neighbors like Pakistan, through the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which has generated around 75,000 jobs for locals in Pakistan. Even in Laos, we recently opened the China-Laos Railway (Boten–Vientiane railway) to connect the Laos capital Vientiane and the northern town of Boten on the border with Yunnan, China. You said: "One neighbor they could help is North Korea, They could help NK be as great and productive as South Korea, or maybe even as productive as China." I find it ironic that you would accuse China of "not doing enough" to help North Korea, when China is already North Korea's biggest trading partner. But the problem is that the U.S slapped crippling sanctions on North Korea and stymied its economic growth. After the Korean War, North Korea was actually the more prosperous country on the Korean Peninsula, while South Korea was poor and had a GDP lower than some sub-Saharan African countries. With the U.S sanctions in place, China is limited in the amount of trade we can conduct with North Korea. If you really wanted North Korea to improve, you should ask the U.S to lift those sanctions on North Korea then. You said: "Tell me something bad the PRC did and I'll tell you more bad things the US did." I already know plenty of the bad things that the U.S did, and since I've already highlighted some bad things China has done, I see no further need to continue responding to your demands.
    2
  12438.  @buckygoldstein9256  You don't think the Americans importing slaves from Africa to pick cotton or causing the genocide of Native Americans and continued occupation of their lands (even till today) is bad? Because these actions had far wider repercussions than what you just mentioned isn't it?
    2
  12439.  @buckygoldstein9256  You said: "Do you think that is just capitalism? Because if you do we could talk about that." Capitalism is a heartless ideology, it's the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the end goal being the depletion of the Earth's resources, if left unchecked. That's because our modern industries are too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, homes, schools, hospitals, etc, for virtually everyone on the planet. Despite this abundance, we still have on this planet, starving people, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to affordable healthcare, and so on. Because under capitalism, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that resources should be distributed according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" (German: Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen). The Earth resources are limited, and we should be prioritizing distribution of resources to those that most urgently need it. What's the point of capitalists hoarding profit? Can they take their profits into the afterlife? Yet, people like Chiang said "communism is a disease of the heart" well, I most certainly don't agree. It's capitalism that seeks to shrink worker wages in order to skim off a higher profit margin for themselves, while communism seeks to make the workers own the means of production.
    2
  12440.  @buckygoldstein9256  About China's tech prowess, China has even launched space stations into orbit. Tiangong-1 (天宫一号, "Celestial Palace-1"') was China's first prototype space station which orbited Earth from September 2011 to April 2018, serving as both a crewed laboratory and an experimental test bed to demonstrate orbital rendezvous and docking capabilities. In 2013, there was even a "space lecture" where a teacher live streamed experiments in microgravity environments to her students on the ground below. Yet you boasted that Taiwan's technology has surpassed the PRC's? Where is Taiwan's space station as compared to the mainland's?
    2
  12441.  @buckygoldstein9256  Contrary to popular belief, Libya under Muammar Gaddafi was arguably Africa's most prosperous democracy, before the Libyan War reduced the prosperous nation to a shadow of it's former glory. All Libyans were allowed to take part in local committees meetings, and at times Colonel Gaddafi was criticized. In fact, there were numerous occasions when his proposals were rejected by popular vote and the opposite was approved and put forward for legislation. When the Japanese invaded Manchuria in 1931, (8 years before the start of WWII when German invaded Poland) the Americans were content to let Imperial Japan conquer more and more Chinese territory. The U.S only gotten involved in WWII against Japan, because Pearl Harbor was bombed, not for China's sake, and the Flying Tigers did not fight the Japanese until after Pearl Harbor was attacked. In total, China fought Japan for 14 years (1931-1945) with 11 years alone, while the U.S fought Japan for 3 years (1942-1945) with Chinese aid.
    2
  12442.  @ernestosamuelsen6984  Evil? China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. And warmongers like you are the reason why USA is so eager for war. China does not want war, but that does not mean China is weak. China is not afraid of war, and we will fight to defend our sovereignty and protect our homes and loved ones from the invaders from the other side of the Pacific Ocean.
    2
  12443.  @AlexSmith-ln1tv  Yes, it's probably even better since the digital currency can't be printed by forgers as fake notes. There are also mechanisms in place to protect against digital forgeries.
    2
  12444.  @CyrusJanssen  Frankly speaking, Trump is one of the few U.S president that did not start any new hot war during his term. Trump actually arranged for the U.S withdrawal from Afghanistan (which Biden eventually botched).
    2
  12445.  @jeffreyhinds6440  According to the following graph, when the British first arrived on India's shore in 1820s, India's share of the global GDP was around 20%. By the time the British had left, India's share had been reduced to 4%. Where did India's previous wealth gone? India was arguably better off without British colonial rule introducing Western brand of democracy to them. Graph: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA_Middle_East.png
    2
  12446. What about the thieves that stole America and Australia from the Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, and occupy those lands even till today?
    2
  12447. Agreed. Actors are just actors after all, not politicians, political commentators, analysts, experts. They may lack political awareness of the state the country is in, but they wield powerful influence over their fan base, and the words coming out of their mouths are treated as gospel by their fan base.
    2
  12448.  Hutomo Riyadi  Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that the cost of living in America is kept to a minimum. Think about the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursuits like cars, housing, luxury brands, school fees, tuition fees and so on. That's why many Americans flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices. Because it saves them money.
    2
  12449.  @Jayzylyn  "Probably should stop buying China made product for now." America is actually dependent on China for almost 80% of its medicines, which is especially important given the current situation. Fox Business reports that according to FDA estimate at least 80 percent of active ingredients found in all of America’s medicine come from abroad, primarily from China. And it’s not just the ingredients, China wants to become the world’s dominant generic drug maker. So far Chinese companies are making generic for everything from high blood pressure to chemotherapy drugs. 90 percent of America’s prescriptions are for generic drugs. Source: U.S. is Dependent on China for Almost 80% of Its Medicine saraacarter.com/u-s-is-dependent-on-china-for-almost-80-of-its-medicine/
    2
  12450.  @MYSG-nc6wp  "Shenzhou. My country doesn't stop me from speaking up," But this is what Human Right's Watch has to say about Singapore. Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. ... (Source: Human Rights Watch: Singapore)
    2
  12451. The root cause of this is Capitalism, which allows the rich developed countries to buy up and hoard the Covid-19 vaccines, leaving behind little to none for the poorer developing countries. Communism is the belief that resources should be distributed according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs (German: Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen)" Had we been living in a truly communist society, then scarce resources like vaccines should be distributed according to needs (i.e the poorer developed countries have priority access to vaccines) under the principles of Marxist philosophy.
    2
  12452.  @KIMJUNGEUNism  About liberal democracy, what makes you think allowing ordinary people to participate in political decision-making is a good idea? Ordinary people are fickle and they make poor voters for several reasons: -Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (i.e. They may not turn up to vote, or they submit blank votes) -Ordinary people may base their vote on emotions, not logic (i.e. Many British don't like immigrants, so majority voted for Brexit) -Ordinary people are susceptible to foreign influences (i.e. Russian interference in US elections) -Ordinary people may simply lack awareness of the country's real political situation, to make informed decisions regarding the country's future. There's a host of other problems associated with democracy, so why not let those who know how to govern, govern? That's what China is doing and look at how successful China is.
    2
  12453.  @ericcartmann  I mean, look at the West, and Western governments are bending over backwards to accommodate Muslims far too much. The Muslim refugees are fleeing their conflict-ridden Islamic nations, and flooding Western countries like USA, France and Germany, and they are under little pressure to assimilate into their predominantly Christian host countries, much to the disgruntlement of local Americans and Europeans. Instead, Muslim immigrants pursue their own traditions like Muslims men marrying multiple wives, and Muslim women continuing to wear Muslim headveil while in public, and secretly, many Americans and Europeans are angry that Muslims are under little pressure to adopt their host country's cultures, but they remain fearful of voicing their honest opinions for fear of being labelled as "racist" (even when Islam is not a race) or "Islamophobe" (fear of Islam) because of a culture of "political correctness". The Muslims take Westerner's silence as acceptance of their ways and thus, they are under little pressure to change and assimilate into your countries.
    2
  12454.  @saimalishahid1406  You live in Saudi Arabia? Then why the government there don't allow women to drive? Women in Saudi Arabia have to be escorted everywhere by male family member or relative when they go out in public. It's like women in Saudi Arabia are being treated like kids instead of adults.
    2
  12455.  @thenutbrothers8726  If you read your source carefully, the independent tribunal has zero evidence to support its claims of forced organ harvesting. It's claim is that “The Tribunal has had no evidence that the significant infrastructure associated with China’s transplantation industry has been dismantled—and absent a satisfactory explanation as to the source of readily available organs—concludes that forced organ harvesting continues till today,” said the chair of the tribunal. So you mean you have no evidence that infrastructure associated with China's transplantation industry being dismantled, some how means you can conclude that forced organ harvesting continues today? What sort of logic is this?
    2
  12456.  @thenutbrothers8726  Once again, your tribunal only jumped to the conclusion that there is organ harvesting in China, simply on the basis that "no evidence of the practice having been stopped" What sort of reasoning is this? What evidence of organ harvesting has this independent tribunal presented thus far?
    2
  12457.  @mohammadpanjshiripanjshiri6963  A child learns faster than an adult, because they are at the correct learning phase of their life, that's why schools cram lots of information into children at an early age. But if you grow past the schooling age without attending school, your learning capabilities would be severely hampered as an adult and that's why some of these Uighurs take longer than necessary to learn to make the bed. And China is not the United Kingdom, so why are you comparing China to UK then? Why are you a refugee fleeing your own conflicted Islamic country to UK? Do you adopt the Christian traditions of your host country, the UK?
    2
  12458.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Resources I meant fossil fuel energy resources." Even in fossil fuel energy resources, China is ranked among the Top 15 countries with proven oil reserves out of 100+ countries, so what makes you think China has minimal fossil fuel energy resources?
    2
  12459. +Devilion901 It was Indian troops that entered Chinese territory to obstruct PLA road construction efforts at Doklam. Doklam lies on the China-Bhutan border, not the China-India border, so how did Indian troops get there? By trespassing into Chinese territory uninvited. Also, Doklam is not claimed by India, so why India send its troops to foreign land in the first place?
    2
  12460. +Aryavarta Bharat So isn't that an example of Indian troops invading territory that it does not claim for itself? The Doklam issue should be settle by Bhutan and China bilaterally, without Indian interference.
    2
  12461. The government has produced evidence in the form of a 1890 treaty (Convention of Calcutta) to support our claims to Donglong. But what evidence has Bhutanese government ever shown to support its claims? And India just blindly support Bhutan claims without proof?
    2
  12462.  Anonymous Panacea  "No one should be able to tolerate that for the sake of an economy." The United States is able to tolerate authoritarian regimes with human rights issues such as Saudi Arabia and Israel as their allies, so can't the U.S do the same with China despite our differences? Clearly the U.S is not driven by human rights, but they are willing to use it as an excuse to sanction China that's all.
    2
  12463.  @ขวดงึก-ฏ6ษ  Here's the most jaw-dropping aerial drone view of beautiful Shanghai in just 3 minutes. Video: youtu.be/1cC-j4_NtvE?t=6 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    2
  12464. People wanting to climb Chomolungma (Zhūmùlǎngmǎ 珠穆朗玛峰) aka Mount Everest, have found that the infrastructure on the Tibet side of the Himalayas is more developed than the infrastructure on the Nepal side.
    2
  12465. @Madhur Gupta How is China linked to terrorism? China doesn't even have entry in the Wikipedia: State-sponsored terrorism page. Source: State-sponsored terrorism wikipedia.org/wiki/State-sponsored_terrorism
    2
  12466. Foreigners always complain Chinese people rude, spit in public, jaywalk, jump queues, disobey traffic laws, litter, etc, so why can't Chinese government implement social credit system to discourage such behavior? If their score falls too low, then they will be not allowed to buy air tickets and fly to other countries to make nuisance of themselves. Not permanently of course, at least until their score improves.
    2
  12467.  @b3arwithm3  The US? They do have the highest number of cases after all.
    2
  12468.  @kristinheartknaan  No problem. I just felt that only a few people are putting forth China's point of view regarding the South China Sea dispute.
    2
  12469.  @hoetato4193  Imported cases are actually the easiest case to deal with, because they arrive at the airport and get quarantined for 14 days first so if they test positive for Covid-19, then it's easier to control, rather than local cases which can easily get out of control.
    2
  12470.  @aesthetical9068  Video: Repatriation of over 1.4 million Chinese students stranded abroad by Covid-19 creates dilemma youtu.be/e4DApaFsVKU And USA is currently the world's epicentre of Covid-19, seeing more cases than Spain, Italy, France and Germany combined, so of course China doesn't want any more flights from America than absolutely necessary
    2
  12471.  DSki Dski  In China, the Chinese government controls the Chinese companies for China's benefit, reining in companies when they gone too far. Whereas in the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    2
  12472.  DSki Dski  Is what the Chinese government doing not to the benefit of the Chinese people? Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why the American monopolies like Apple, Google, Facebook, and Amazon dominate their respective industries and eliminated competition from smaller American firms, stifling innovation through competition in the process. China actually has an anti-monopoly law to clamp down on anti-competitive practices in Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, and this is to the people's benefit as smaller companies can emerge in the market to cater to such customers.
    2
  12473. 这频道比其他西方媒体好的很多。
    2
  12474.  Steve Bingham  Here's British-Australian cyclist Jerry Grey, who has traveled to Xinjiang five times and bicycled across several provinces of China, on Xinjiang. Video: Xinjiang: From the eyes of an Australian British who cycled across China youtu.be/-jlUy2DR8TQ
    2
  12475. 我们要继续努力，为中国创造更美好的未来。🇨🇳 We must continue our efforts to build a better future for China. 🇨🇳
    2
  12476.  @truthseekerodinson5094  Ukraine is not a democracy. Freedom House, a nonpartisan think tank that ranks democracies, has labeled Ukraine “a transitional or hybrid regime” in one recent report and “partly free” in a second report. Even the Economist Intelligence Unit, has pegged Ukraine as a “hybrid regime.” Ukraine banned opposition media and arrested opposition leaders like Medvedchuk.
    2
  12477.  @matthewburgess1406  "神州 Shenzhou maybe because China has directly threatened Australia with ballistic and nuclear warheads over some comments about the treatment of the Uyghur people" Australia is literally buying nuclear submarines through the AUKUS deal with US. (snubbing France in the process), making Australia a potential target for nuclear strikes. China did not threaten Australia, all we did is point out this fact. If Australia don't want a giant nuclear target painted on themselves, then just don't buy nuclear subs is all.
    2
  12478.  @stephenguy3901  "China is another authoritarian regime so that doesn't surprise me" Well, India is the world's largest democracy and they didn't condemn Putin. Yet why are you claiming that the Democratic countries of the world condemn Putin?
    2
  12479.  @soundbite290  Hong Kong had been under authoritarian British colonial rule for more than 100 years, and during that period, Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy under British rule. Virtually no elections were ever held by Hong Kong people while it was British colony, only the period of the Hong Kong handover to mainland China, did the people of Hong Kong finally get to vote for their favorite leaders. So isn't this a vast improvement over their earlier status as a British colony?
    2
  12480.  @jtf873  What he was trying to suggest is that it you are an enemy then that can be a danger but at least you know where you stand. But if you are a friend then you will be destroyed because that's the way it operates.
    2
  12481.  @jtf873  "it was allegedly dealing with Vietnam, and what people think regarding the leaders in the South and their end." And did you know what happened to South Vietnam? They were an ally, yet the US pulled out of Vietnam and left the South to their fate (i.e the Fall of Saigon). Same thing again happened in Afghanistan, where USA's Afghan allies were abandoned after the US's shambolic withdrawal from Kabul (i.e the Fall of Kabul). People have even compared the photo of US Chinook helicopter lifting off from Saigon in 1975 with a recent photo of another lifting off in Kabul in 2021. It just goes to show that the saying (whatever its origins) is apt. "To be an enemy of the US is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal."
    2
  12482.  @soshyaldistansingh6628  Singapore and Malaysia are both former British colonies, so they it's inevitable that the people have a certain degree of colonial mentality. What I was saying is that from my experience, the colonial mentality is more prominent in Singapore than in Malaysia. Like you said, the British education in Singapore created a class of people who think and act like the Brits, and look down on those who weren't British educated.
    2
  12483.  @ItsJustCartier  First you claim there is a genocide, now you're claiming that there are re-education camps? Which is it? Genocide or Reform?
    2
  12484. In chess, if you don't choose your moves carefully, then your opponent will start choosing them for you.
    2
  12485. Like the Yin-Yang symbol☯. There is a small white dot in the black half as well as a small black dot in the white half, representing interconnectedness and the harmony of opposing forces.
    2
  12486.  @MarkYeung1  The 2 Michaels aren't "arbitrary detentions". Michael Spavor has been convicted in court of espionage and sentenced to 11 years in prison. Michael Kovrig was also later charged with espionage.
    2
  12487.  @MarkYeung1  What has Nelson Mandela even got to do with this topic? Why do you keep jumping around from topic to topic when cornered?
    2
  12488.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "In Hong Kong what will happen to it ?" Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    2
  12489.  @peterhanssens7260  "From the get go, do you think that the CCP has any intention of respecting the conditions of the agreement of 1984 over time?" Previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong during this period. Only during the period of Hong Kong's 1997 handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, where they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony? Even today, Hong Kong clearly have their own government separate from the mainland, and people of Hong Kong even held a 2019 election resulting in landslide victory for pro-democracy groups. If you go and read Taiwan's constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of territory Taiwan claims. Source: Map of ROC Administrative and Claims wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    2
  12490.  @peterhanssens7260  Previously Hong Kong was a thriving port city under authoritarian British colonial rule, while the mainland was still dirt-poor at that time. At the time of Hong Kong's 1997 handover, Hong Kong's GDP made up 20% of China's economy. However, fortunes have reversed today Hong Kong makes only 2% of China's GDP, as Hong Kong falls behind other mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan, and is facing increasing levels of competition from other upcoming port cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Dalian, Xiamen. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports No wonder why the people of Hong Kong slowly feel like they are being left behind as more and more mainland cities start surpassing Hong Kong. Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Even if reunification isn't done by military force (that's a possibility that's on the table) Taiwan might eventually be assimilated back into mainland China through economic and cultural connections. Not to mention many of the older people in Taiwan have families in the mainland. President Xi Jinping has offered to extend the One Country, Two Systems Policy to include Taiwan as well, allowing Taiwan to rejoin the mainland, but at the same time, allowing some degree of autonomy (such as allowing Taiwan to keep their own separate government) and for the mainland to keep the ours. But Taiwan rejected President Xi's offer and did not made a counter offer of their own.
    2
  12491.  @peterhanssens7260  What's all this warmongering, paranoia talk by you, constantly painting China as aggressive? Hong Kong will be fully returned back to China by 2047 (after the Sino-British declaration expires after 50 years after the 1997 handover), so what's wrong with Hong Kong becoming "another mainland city?" What's wrong with this term "another mainland city"? Look at prosperous Shenzhen in the mainland, just across from Hong Kong and Shenzhen’s economic growth surpassed Hong Kong's in 2017. Source: Shenzhen surpasses US$338 billion GDP mark in 2017, beats Hong Kong and Singapore’s growth scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2128310/shenzhen-88-cent-hi-tech-growth-roll-hit-y2tr-2017 Shenzhen is roughly the same economic size as Singapore and Hong Kong, but recorded nominal output of 2.2 trillion yuan (US$338 billion) in 2017 thanks to its booming hi-tech sector. Over 40% of the output came from “innovative” businesses such as internet, biotech and telecom. And that's despite Shenzhen being under communist party rule, while Hong Kong is suffering under its own democratic government. If you claim said that Taiwan should hold a plebiscite, then shouldn't you also get the opinion of all of mainland Chinese that Taiwan is part of China? You say the great majority of the Chinese community in Greater Vancouver consider themselves Taiwanese, then why are they in Vancouver, Canada? From what you said so far, you don't sound like you're Chinese yourself, why are you involving yourself in China's internal affairs in HK and TW? If war breaks out between Taiwan and the mainland, that would be a resumption of the Chinese Civil War, therefore it's an internal civil war within China. Japan is bound by WWII surrender treaty (Article 9 of the Japanese constitution) to not declare war on any other country (except in self-defence) so why would they join in a hypothetical war within China, when their constitution forbids the declaration of war? Why would South Korea also join the hypothetical war within China? Doing so will weaken South Korea's forces, making it ripe for their neighbour North Korea to reunify Korea. South Korea is most concerned with North Korean forces, why would they waste their forces on a hypothetical internal civil war within China? And why would U.S support Taiwan against mainland China? China is USA's biggest trading partner, what does Taiwan have to offer USA that they would declare war with mainland China?
    2
  12492.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "not recognising the decision of the World Court in Le Hague" What's this "World Court in Le Hague"? You keep on changing the name of the organisation from "International High Court in the Hague" to " High Court of the Hague"_ to "World Court of Le Hague" do you actually know the name of the organisation? The arbitral ruling was conducted by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which is a non-UN agency it only shares the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Source: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1989486/united-nations-stresses-separation-hague-tribunal The United Nations clarified on its Chinese microblog yesterday that the tribunal that ruled against China’s historic claims over the disputed South China Sea was not a UN agency. The Permanent Court of Arbitration rents space in the same building as the UN’s International Court of Justice, but the two organisations are not related. So why are you confusing the PCA with the ICJ when the two organisations are unrelated? The PCA doesn't have the same level of jurisdiction over sovereignty issues as there ICJ, so since the arbitral ruling was made by a non-UN agency, then China reserves the right not to adhere to PCA's ruling.
    2
  12493.  @peterhanssens7260  But the arbitration court that the Philippines submitted their claim to is NOT the International Court of Justice, it's the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which is classified as a non-UN agency, so why do you keep on bringing up the ICJ when it wasn't them that did the tribunal ruling? Since the ruling was made by non-UN agency like PCA, then China reserves the right not to adhere to it's ruling. Yet you keep bringing up the ICJ for what? The two organisations aren't related, they only share the same office space in the Hague that's all.
    2
  12494.  @haroldshipman5419  You said: "When China gets nuked no one will care." Why do you not care if China gets nuked, wiping away 20% of the world's population and turning out country into a ruined wasteland? You have shown that you're anti-China you care absolutely nothing about Chinese lives.
    2
  12495.  @haroldshipman5419  Then you can kiss the two detained Canadians goodbye if Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou gets extradited to the USA. Recent news is that Meng Wanzhou is going to be released soon.
    2
  12496.  @thevirusfactory2332  Huawei CEO Ren Zhengfei already responded how can Huawei steal American 5G when Huawei's 5G infrastructure is way more advanced than America's? America can barely even provide 4G coverage to many of it's territories.
    2
  12497.  @thevirusfactory2332  "神州 Shenzhou BOYCOTT EVERYTHING CHINA" Why don't you start at home by ridding your house of all Made-in-China products? Get rid of your computers, electronics, smartphones, appliances, TVs, refrigerators, toys, clothing, sneakers, etc anything that's Made-in-China. Check your electronics for Made-in-China parts and get rid of them all, since you want to boycott everything China.
    2
  12498. Where is Saddam Hussein's chemical weapons then? After Iraq war, no trace of WMDs were even found to be in Iraq's possession, so what is the motive for USA invading Iraq then? Now USA is claiming Syria has chemical weapons too? And what makes you think installing democracy isn't bad, when it results in bloodshed and civilian casualties? During Vietnam War, USA use napalm to burn out villages and chemicals like Agent Orange to destroy foliage to expose the Viet Cong, but it result in lingering effects on Vietnamese civilians. And what makes you think USA is responsible for South Korea and China responsible for Vietnam? Every country is responsible for itself. Look at USA invade Iraq and Afghanistan, and are those countries any better than they were before? In Civil War people die, just like in American civil war, so why are you blaming China for civil war? Today, China is not at war with any country, and is peaceful for 30 years since our last war in 1979. And killing people who disobey the government is part of capital punishment isn't it? Even the USA sentence criminals to death for disobeying the government laws so if you claim that this is bad, then why USA have capital punishment too? And you think all religion are good is that it? Why can't Chinese government take measures to curb religions that are disruptive to daily life? If you don't control the religion, then the religion will control your people isn't it? And regarding loans, China runs a business, not a charity. Why is it you think giving charity to people will help them? If you give someone a fish, they live for a day. If you teach him to fish, then they live for way longer. China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, schools, hospitals, hotels, shopping centers, powerstations and telecommunication projects, so that African nations can prosper. Isn't that much better than just giving charity?
    2
  12499. Chinese workers make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, clothing, sneakers, etc, cheaply so that the cost of living is lower than it should be. Think of the millions of dollars people in other countries have saved over the years on living expenses, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on things like cars, housing, getting married, or paying school fees, college tuition, doctor's fees, etc.
    2
  12500.  @mfernandez4869  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China, and incorporated those territory into the Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty. Tibet broke free of China in 1912, but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951.
    2
  12501.  @distinctga5811  You said: "In the West, unlike China, diversity of thought is fostered." Then why is it people who say positive things about China or Russia are being labelled as communist shills or Putin-bots if there was so-called diversity of thought? I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, and I was appalled at the sheer amount of anti-China sentiment exhibited in the West. Whenever I bring up China's achievements under the CPC, many Westerners (not all) just laugh at me, called me "brainwashed" or a shill, and some even took it step further and told me to "Go back to China if you like it there!" (this coming from people who never actually set foot in China themselves)
    2
  12502.  @michaelkatz275  "神州 Shenzhou It looks as if this time though the Western journalists may hit the bull's eye." They have been missing the bull's eye for nearly 30 years, what makes you think they will hit it this time?
    2
  12503.  @pedroelso8801  Why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage compared to the Nationalist KMT, who had massive wealth (taxed from peasants), superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all their initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates the KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communist's right to rule China.
    2
  12504.  @distinctga5811  You said: "The ownership and influences are extremely diverse because EVERYONE can get on and say what they want." Tell that to Assange. And if that's the case, then the former President of the United States, Donald Trump, won't be banned from Facebook, Twitter, etc, why why keep up the facade that it is independent?
    2
  12505. China's strategy has produced many successful Chinese companies like Huawei, Lenovo, Xiaomi, ZTE, Oppo, Haier, DJI, Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, JD, China Mobile, China Railway Construction, Sinochem, China Construction Bank, Agricultural Bank of China, ICBC, State Grid Corporation, Sinopec Group, China National Petroleum, PetroChina, State Construction Engineering, China Minmetals, Ping An Insurance, Shenhua Energy, Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, and this list is not exhaustive. List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks Fortune Global 500 wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_Global_500 Forbes Global 2000 wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Global_2000 So if China can continue to churn out successful companies for China, then why is there a need to open up our economy more? Why give advantages to foreign companies wanting a bigger slice of China's market? We should develop our own companies locally to be capable of rivaling that of US companies, so that the profits remain in China instead of going to foreign companies.
    2
  12506.  @himanshusingh5214  China is no stranger to innovation. Ancient Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions 四大发明 which have greatly influenced the rest of the world. Paper and Printing made recording and transmission of knowledge much easier. The Compass made navigation much easier and journeys more safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought.
    2
  12507.  @himanshusingh5214  The Westerners believe in "free market" system, which is likened to a wild, untamed river, flowing to and fro according to market forces. Would you let the river flow unchecked and cause widespread destruction to your markets? Because that is what happens in a free market, and that's why USA let its market get flooded with cheap Chinese goods, and US companies are allowed to escape to low labour countries like China and Vietnam and set up here. The Chinese government's approach is to "tame the river" by building a "dam" and controlling the river in order to maximise the benefits to China. China has a large market which is why many foreign companies want a slice and our own fledgling Chinese companies would surely perish if exposed directly to global competition from Western companies, so the government "shields" them and provide a home advantage to local companies to allow them to compete with foreign companies. For example, China block Western websites like Facebook, Google, YouTube, etc, and develop our own equivalents, like Weibo, Baidu, YouKu, etc, so as to deny profits to the foreign companies. Once our local companies become strong enough, they can slowly start expanding to foreign markets outside of China. Huawei and Lenovo are two examples of Chinese companies that have expanded to overseas markets. China's approach is apparently very successful, because the above listed Chinese companies are products of China's strategy. Those companies I mentioned would probably not exist today, if not for the government strictly limiting foreign companies in China.
    2
  12508.  @himanshusingh5214 Why should China have a free market? Look at what free market system did to USA, flooding their markets with Chinese goods. If China open the floodgates completely, foreign companies will flood and dominate our markets, strangling our local Chinese companies. So why can't we regulate the number of foreign companies entering China?
    2
  12509.  @himanshusingh5214 Also this is different from Qing dynasty, where China was completely cut off from the rest of the world. Today, we are not "walling ourselves off completely from the river" instead, we are "building a dam, and only letting a trickle of the river" enter China, in controlled doses that's all.
    2
  12510.  @himanshusingh5214  How is what I am saying equivalent to what Qing did? I am not claiming China should close off ourselves completely, I am saying China should regulate our market ourselves in a planned economy in order to maximise the benefits to China. I am clearly describing that China should not adopt a "free market" system, and I clearly stated my reasons for not doing so, such as letting foreign companies flood our markets, and strangling our local companies. I mean, Chinese companies like Huawei, Lenovo, Xiaomi, Alibaba, Tencent, etc, wouldn't exist today, if not for Chinese goverment offering home advantages to local companies to enable them to compete with foreign companies. Why can't we continue on this path then? We should be developing our own local companies to be capable of rivaling that of US companies, so that the profits remain in China instead of going to foreign companies.
    2
  12511. Himanshu Singh  You have been repeating the same point again consistently since your first post here. Don't you have any thing to contribute to the discussion at all? How is what I am saying equivalent to what Qing did? I have already made my previous points as clear as possible. The Qing Dynasty lost to British because they lagged behind in military technology. But modern China is not Qing Dynasty and we are working hard to improve our military technology. The People's Liberation Army is the world's largest land army and it to act as a deterrent so that other countries like Britain and Japan think twice before invading China again like they did in the past.
    2
  12512. Himanshu Singh Again, you keep making the same point again, without going into actual detail. How is CCP being similar in thinking to Qing dynasty? Qing dynasty was complacent and neglected military development, that's why China was invaded by technologically superior British and Japan. The CCP learns from the Qing dynasty's mistakes, that's why they channel funds into developing our military and in fact, the PLA is funded by the world's 2nd largest military budget. For example, the PLA Navy has completed 2 aircraft carriers of our own, the Type 001 Liaoning 辽宁 in 2012, and recently in 2017, the Type 001A aircraft carrier, and still have 2 more carriers in production. China also commissioned a new guided missile destroyer, the Type 055 with displacement of 12,000 tons, equipped with 130 mm deck gun, 2x 64-cell Vertical Launch System quad packs, anti-ship cruise missiles, land attack cruise missiles, anti-aircraft missiles, anti-ship missiles, anti-submarine rockets and torpedos, and many more. China's Type 055 Guided Missile Destroyer youtube.com/watch?v=oaVp04Sn3ag&t=143 So how exactly is China not learning from the world?
    2
  12513.  @himanshusingh5214 How exactly are you saying your point in different wordings? You never elaborated how CCP is similar to Qing dynasty at all. The Qing dynasty neglected their military that's why Britain and Japan invaded, but how is modern China neglecting our military? For example, China is investing heavily into military drone technology and we unveiled our very own combat UAV, the Caihong 彩虹 (Rainbow) series. The CH-4 has been compared to the US Reaper combat drone and is capable of firing air-to-ground missile from altitude of 5,000 meters allowing it to be able to fire from a position that provides wider viewing area, while staying outside of effective range of most anti-aircraft guns. The newer CH-5 series is even capable of linking and cooperating with CH-3 and CH-4 drones. China unveils its answer to US Reaper drone how does it compare youtube.com/watch?v=Oe7o9grEf-Q So how exactly is what modern China doing like Qing dynasty?
    2
  12514. "The West is an empire of lies!" - Vladimir Putin Western Imperialism was built through colonization of natives, now it's latest incarnation is to use natives as tools to overthrow their own government.
    2
  12515. China is helping other countries by sharing information about Covid-19, sending PPE like masks, gloves, goggles, faceshields, gowns, and so on to affected countries. USA is hijacking PPE from other countries.
    2
  12516. +BoloYung Why are you insulting me personally now? I do not insult you or mock your intelligence. I merely pointed out that other countries have done the same thing to Chinese people in their lands, so why can't China do the same to people living in our lands? Like Allan Kamen said, every country ssupport their own culture and people first. Since when is Chinese culture banned in China? Chinese people celebrate Chinese New Year and Chunyun 春运 "Spring Travel" period has been called the world's largest annual human migration in the world, even more than Christmas travel period. What about Qingming Jie 清明节 where Chinese people visit our ancestors graves to clean up and pay respects? What about Mid-Autumn festival and eating mooncakes? Chinese culture has 5000 years of history and no single man or government in China was able to wipe out all of China's rich culture. According to UNESCO, China is ranked 2nd in number of World Heritage Sites at 52, behind Italy/Rome at number 1 with 53, so why do you claim that the government is trying to ban everything Chinese?
    2
  12517. Even if you listen to the Mandarin interpreter translating his words, she deliberately ask different questions as if prompting him to read out from a script.
    2
  12518.  @timlin3243  "神州 Shenzhou of course he’s not paid personally by Xi Baozi. But this white Wumao is doing some business inside the WALL." Inside the Wall? So you're saying that anyone that does business inside China is somehow paid by the Chinese government? That's virtually every company in the world, from Apple, Nike, Tesla, Walmart, etc, you name it, they all do business inside China, so they are all "white wumaos"? How does your logic make sense then?
    2
  12519.  @Andy-P  Russia is ending an ongoing conflict that began 8 years prior.
    2
  12520.  @Andy-P  So you're supporting the prolonging of the war? And Ukraine is still heavily outmatched by Russia, they have hypersonic missiles such as Kinzhal (Dagger) and Zircon for crying out loud.
    2
  12521. The bully also tries to get his fan girls to ostracize the other guy. Tik Tok is the latest victim.
    2
  12522.  @ayushkarn5972  Indus Valley Civilization forms much of modern day Pakistan (of which India has recognized as a separate country altogether) so if anything, the Indus Valley is part of Pakistan's history.
    2
  12523.  @michaelmoore1637  "神州 Shenzhou those so called grievances go to the very heart of the problem." That they are. China has summarized the deterioration of the Australia-China relations into 14 grievances, and presented them as a starting point to improve Australia-China relations. While these 14 grievances were basically ignored, hopefully with the ousting of Scott Morrison (who was clearly anti-China) and the ushering in of Anthony Albanese could see improved Australia-China relations. You said: "That is not going to happen in another five thousand years of Chinese history." Well, China has survived 5,000 years of history, perhaps China might survive another. Who knows?
    2
  12524.  @clintpot8521  Protect their citizens health? People in China literally have a longer life expectancy at birth than people in the United States, who's countries citizens are healthier?
    2
  12525. There's a Chinese saying that goes: "Lifting a stone to throw it at others, only to drop it on your own feet." (搬起石头砸自己的脚)
    2
  12526.  @rexwu7849  Speaking of "prison systems" it's actually the United States that's home to the world's largest prison incarceration rate, so much such that the U.S government periodically releases convicts back on the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons.
    2
  12527.  Charles Schmid  What Uighur genocide? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size, because ethnic minorities in China (Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchu, etc) aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) and can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    2
  12528.  Charles Schmid  Investigate the mysterious pneumonia like illness near Fort Detrick in the USA and who knows, you'll might find answers to the origin of the coronavirus in China from the USA.
    2
  12529.  Charles Schmid  Why not USA allow WHO to investigate Fort Detrick, to show that it's so-called "fake news"?
    2
  12530. The culture of vandalism was imported from the West, and it was displayed prominently in the 2019 Hong Kong riots where protestors vandalized public property, damaged traffic lights, smashed windows and threw molotov cocktails.
    2
  12531. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  12532. Joboy Pinoy 2 Really? You mean sending temporary warships patrols to South China Sea is going to do anything to stop the government from building islands and fortifying them with anti-ship missiles and SAMs? What the USA does is only temporary and the warships need to return to home base eventually. But our islands, missiles and bombers are in the South China Sea, 24/7 all year round.
    2
  12533. Agreed. China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US short term leadership.
    2
  12534. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    2
  12535. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  12536. Even the United States of American accepts that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  12537. Even the USA accepts that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  12538. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  12539. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    2
  12540. Even the US agrees that Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  12541.  @user-gi3uw2th6m  Yes. History has much to teach, if only students would listen to what it says. Throughout 5,000 years of history, China has accumulated thousands of years of historical books, miltary textbooks, political literature and governing manuals on how to successfully govern a populous country like China. It's this wealth of political experience, that guides our leaders hands in planning for the future of our country.
    2
  12542. Brian, you said Russia was expelled from the UN Human Rights Council, but your article says that Russia was merely suspended which merely suggests a temporary ban, but not a permanent expulsion from the UN Human Rights council. Which one is correct?
    2
  12543. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiments in the West against Russia and China. And it's having the effect of bringing both Russia and China closer together than we've ever been.
    2
  12544.  @anwaydas817  "But chinese people must change their mindset on indian caste system open defecation etc." You want Chinese to change our mindset? I can't possibly control what other people choose to say. There's so many China haters who say horrible things (like @Sikorsky Yeee who said "so all Chinese eat bats dogs cats and even aborted babies okay h enough talk now go bring the momos you small eyed weird looking alien") But do I ask you people to change your mindset? I don't expect you to control how other people think about China or choose to say about China.
    2
  12545.  @anwaydas817  Look at the sheer volume of anti-China comments directed against Chinese people. China has made numerous achievements, yet Western media tends to overlook positive things about China. For example, China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    2
  12546.  @commentatortea3650  Agreed, the Russians invented the hypersonic weapon technology, but the Americans are unwilling to call it a "Sputnik Moment" (ironically, Sputnik-1 was the world's first satellite launched by the Soviet Union), yet when China does it, the U.S is out to paint China in a bad light. Worst of all, the U.S can test hypersonic weapons of their own (which failed btw) and nobody cares about U.S admitting to testing hypersonic weapons.
    2
  12547.  @ne0ge049  The United States spent 20 years and wasted trillions of taxpayers dollars to replace the Taliban with the Taliban. The US left behind billions of dollars of U.S military equipment in Afghanistan, an amount equivalent to around 7 Gerald Ford class aircraft carriers worth of U.S military equipment left behind for the Taliban.
    2
  12548.  @ne0ge049  Russia has the Zircon hypersonic weapon, China has tested the DF-ZF seven times in the past, but where's the US hypersonic weapon? And the Pentagon clearly announced the US hypersonic test failed.
    2
  12549. I never said Chinese drones are better than Israeli drones, but China is capable of producing our own domestic combat-capable UAVs for deployment in mountainous terrains like Himalayas, whereas India has to rely on purchasing drones from other countries. Combat drones also free up PLA troops to be deployed elsewhere and even if destroyed, they don't cost any PLA soldier's life and more drones can always be made. As for China's forces, China has also built railways and transports in Tibet to help them arrive at the frontlines. China has also conducted live fire tests in Tibet, deploying artillery, howitzers, mortars, multi-launch rocket systems, etc. during this test. Video:Chinese Army carries out military exercise on Tibet plateau youtube.com/watch?v=a8bNgIckr10
    2
  12550. Why do you think Tibetan population is unfriendly? China has helped to modernize Tibet as I have mentioned previously, so what makes you think that Tibetans will turn against China? Where do Tibetan separatists get their weapons from out there in the mountains? About constantly claiming that Chinese forces will be a continent away from the front line, history has shown that prior to the eruption of war, both sides of warzone will first start to pile up with troops and outposts will be built nearby and supplylines established. During the 3 month long Doklam standoff, PLA troops took the opportunity to fortify our position at Doklam and if a conflict between India and China breaks out, it won't just occur spontaneously. There will usually be a initial build up time when both sides start preparing our forces and building bases to prior to the outbreak of war. During this period, the PLA will start planning supply lines ahead of the conflict.
    2
  12551. I really want to know why you think Tibetans will revolt against China. I mean, you have elaborated on many points, except that one. Have you actually been to Tibet and asked the opinion of the locals there? Otherwise why can't I ask this question? And prior to any war, which country can deploy all its forces before starting a war?
    2
  12552.  @Alan_One1  Why are you hurling vulgarities against me? When did I ever said anything about communism?
    2
  12553.  @Carbuncle0168  Take global Covid-19 vaccine distribution for example, Covid-19 are in scarce supply, and because of capitalism, the developed countries buying up and hoarding the Covid-19 vaccines for themselves and leaving little to none for the developing countries. Had we hypothetically been living in a communistic society instead of capitalistic, then the Covid-19 vaccines would be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." It is better to have some people in all countries vaccinated, then to have all countries in some countries vaccinated.
    2
  12554.  @maicholaa7482  You can't even "copy and paste" the correct name of the Communist Party of China, Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) you just claim it's CCP when the correct name is CPC. Because the Zhōngguó (中国) in the name clearly means China.
    2
  12555.  @messire9837  Did I ever said anything about hegemonic?
    2
  12556.  @theraven5850  You said: "China is a very strong country but on your own you're not very threatening. The USA is threatening but only because of their tech and their allies." I don't understand. Do you actively want China to become threatening? China does not seek global hegemony like the West, so China sees no need to form threatening alliances. By repeating the U.S strategy of forming military alliances like NATO, AUKUS, 5 Eyes, (perhaps The QUAD?), then isn't China following in the U.S hegemonic footsteps? China mainly focuses on economic alliances like BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Initiative (SCO). Although SCO has some security element to it, it's mostly about internal anti-terrorist cooperation between our countries, not a military alliances like NATO, AUKUS, etc.
    2
  12557. China had put forth numerous 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans to map out China's direction and future in 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition. Whereas in the USA, the U.S presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so their leaders can only make short-term plans for America's future, instead of long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more.
    2
  12558.  @gulamog5041  Did I ever said anything about the Communist Party of China here in this thread? Then why are you accusing me of being a CPC troll?
    2
  12559.  @parnamsaini4751  "神州 Shenzhou Like that ah?" Yes, like that... ah.
    2
  12560. It's no secret today that the U.S is in decline and China is rising. Since the 19th century, many have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the U.S someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    2
  12561. @purushprakriti channel Why don't you Indians settle your border dispute with Nepal instead of starting another with China? Nepalese policemen open fired and killed 1 Indian near Bihar over India-Nepal border dispute. Video: 1 Indian killed, 4 injured after Nepal police fired near border area with Bihar youtu.be/SFW4-ViJ0_o
    2
  12562.  @PyroMax  Chinese ground-launched missile even destroyed a satellite in orbit at an altitude of 865 kilometres (537 mi). Source: 2007 Chinese anti-satellite missile wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Chinese_anti-satellite_missile_test
    2
  12563.  @yslee1401  "China vetoed Taiwan’s application." Therefore, you've just shown that Taiwan is not an independent country after all, since mainland China exerts political control over it. In fact, during the Olympics, the athletes from Taiwan can only compete under the banner "Chinese Taipei", so how are they an independent country?
    2
  12564. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Chinese civilization is even older than the birth of Christ!
    2
  12565. Because political dialogue is full of subtle nuances and possible interpretations, so much such that even the "translators" themselves are called "interpreters". Any wrong translation of a President words can have serious consequences (including war) which is why interpreters are still needed to avoid misunderstandings.
    2
  12566.  @paulfri1569  It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    2
  12567.  @paulfri1569  What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study and/or play. Before 2019, everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending coin on your tourist industries. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese businesses like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, DJI, etc are expanding overseas, and Chinese investors are buying up land and property in other countries. So what makes you think Chinese aren't free? Chinese can literally be found all over the globe, we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    2
  12568.  @andrenogueira5058  Usually when there's a ongoing genocide, there would be a mass exodus of refugees flooding the neighboring regions. For example, Jewish refugees from Germany during WWII, or Rohingya refugees from Myanmar, or Afghan refugees from the U.S shambolic withdrawal from Kabul. Yet when it comes to Xinjiang, there are no mass Uighur refugees flooding the neighboring regions, that would be an telltale sign of genocide. So why the West continue to believe those claims?
    2
  12569. Many Indians (but not all) tend to have the Colonial Mentality of worshipping Anglo Saxon culture, while harboring disdain for any "non-white" culture (including their own).
    2
  12570.  @Damo-ml3fc  Contrary to popular world opinion, getting vaccinated or not is still largely the choice of the individual in China. Like elderly folk elsewhere, Chinese elderly aren't exempt from the same fear of vaccines that drives other elderly people (including some young people too) so perhaps there needs to be better education to inform those people.
    2
  12571. Funny how these think tanks are funded by the makers of actual tanks (i.e the military-industrial complex).
    2
  12572. Agreed, even Japanese Fukushima residents are protesting their government's decision to dump irradiated waters into the sea. They spent 10 years slowly rebuilding their reputation and demand for their products, now that's about to take a hit because of Japanese government decision to dump the irradiated water.
    2
  12573. Hong Kong was taken by British from China. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    2
  12574.  @zhugeliang3905  Australia is a non-nuclear country, so if they refine the uranium, that would be in violation of Nuclear Non-Proliferation.
    2
  12575. Still wrong! The Xi 习 in Xi Jinping 习近平 sounds more like "See"
    2
  12576. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my You go on about genetics and how the Japanese are supposedly superior to Chinese, then why hasn't Japan sent humans into space? In October 2003, Chinese astronaut Yang Liwei (杨利伟) became the first person sent into space on board Shenzhou-5 by the Chinese space program.
    2
  12577. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my So since Japan has no space station to call their own, does that means China beat Japan in space technology? Then what makes you claim Japanese have superior genetics?
    2
  12578. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my Speaking of household appliances, Chinese company Haier ranks top in the world in revenue in 2021 according to Statista. In 2020, six household appliances manufacturers worldwide surpassed 10 billion U.S. dollars in revenue with Haier Smart Home leading the ranking with around 36 billion U.S. dollars. The other companies with annual revenues north of 10 billion U.S. dollars are LG, Whirlpool, Midea, BSH Home Appliances, and Electrolux.
    2
  12579. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my "神州 Shenzhou try to make an appliance that works before stepping on mars please." Didn't you read my previous post? Chinese household appliance company Haier ranked top in 2020 in terms of revenue. Additionally, China has landed on Mars, on 2021 and China's Zhurong rover began exploring the Martian landscape. Why hasn't Japan achieved the same feat of landing on Mars?
    2
  12580. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my You're analogy only works when a person lacks blood. But China literally has the world's largest population and we certainly aren't short on blood at the moment. No matter how well-distributed the "blood" in USA is, they are certainly short of it.
    2
  12581. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my You said building space stations is easier than making chips, yet only three countries have launched space stations?
    2
  12582. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my "神州 Shenzhou do you know how you can prove your greatness? answer = make better quality products." Didn't I already shown that Chinese household appliance company Haier ranks top in the world in terms of revenue?
    2
  12583. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my China's Tiangong station makes use of our own domestically produced space-level chip, how is it a foreign part? It was specifically designed and assembled by China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporate for space use.
    2
  12584. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my Earlier you claimed that "building a sky scraper, space station, etc. is much easier than computer chips." then why haven't more countries built space stations if it were a piece of cake to do so, compared to computer chips?
    2
  12585. When a lie gets repeated so often that eventually the lie starts to think it isreal.
    2
  12586. Ukraine is supporting the ultra-nationalists like the Azov Battalion that's carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Luhansk and Donetsk. Over the last 8 years, over 13,000 people have been killed in the Donbas region by shelling (by both sides). Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that began since the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukovych by USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine.
    2
  12587. +kelly hu Excuse me, but who is the one that first brought up Singapore into this discussion? And you are blaming me now for bringing up other countries? Why apply double standards between you and me in this discussion? If you blame CPC leaders for not declaring their income, then what about US president Trump, who promised during his campaign to reveal his tax details upon assuming office? Up till now, President Trump did not release his own tax details. I never said the Chinese government is uncorrupted, but the CPC is already pursuing anti-corruption crackdowns and arresting various high ranking "tigers" for corruption, as often reported in the news. When did I claim that the Chinese people are the real boss? It is only you who believe that countries future lies in its citizen's hands, when in fact, it is the Chinese leaders that are leading the country. Also, like I said, India is world's largest democracy and a multi-party government, but still equally corrupted. So doesn't this statement alone, dismantle your entire argument about how a multi-party system will not suffer from corruption?
    2
  12588. China wanted to negotiate our border peacefully with India, and Zhou Enlai proposed the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence 和平共处五项原则 to define Chinese-Indian relations. But Indian PM Nehru refuse to negotiate and proposed an aggressive "Forward" policy of building military bases at our disputed border.
    2
  12589.  @steveman888  The problem is by ASEAN refusing to recognize the current Myanmar military government, they are in fact aiding the western forces. You're correct that the before the military coup, the previous Myanmar government had foreign involvement by NGOs. Even Aung San Suu Kyi has received money from the National Endowment Democracy, this should already sound off alarm bells. So ASEAN is playing right into the western hands by supporting those foreign funded Myanmar opposition.
    2
  12590. Ren is a property tycoon and also a member of the communist party, he is a real troublemaker and been accused of not paying taxes.
    2
  12591. +Jolo Makinano German tanks, such as the Tiger tank, were feared and respected throughout the battlefield and almost always destroyed American or British tanks in one on one tank fights. America had weaker tanks that were often destroyed going toe to toe with German tanks and had a propsensity to light up in flames when hit. The Sherman tanks especially were given grim nicknames like "Zippo" (after the lighter) or "Tommycooker". Rockets were invented in China, during 10th century Song dynasty China and there are numerous manuals such as Wujing Zongyao 武經總要 and the Huolongjing 火龍經 describing Chinese rockets in detail. The American Abrams tanks made use of the M256 120 mm (4.7 in) smoothbore cannon developed by Rheinmetall AG of Germany for the Leopard 2, so its a clear case of America making use of German Panzer technology. The German MG42 Machine Gun was arguably the best for its time - the fastest with a distinct buzz-saw sound that instilled fear in every allied soldier.
    2
  12592. +kira zeno What if that foe is located further, like on the surface of the Moon for example? Then you'll still need longer distance. In 2010, China also inducted the world's first operational anti-ship ballistic missile, a "carrier killer" capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, known as the DF-21D. It's launched from a land-based mobile launcher and capable of targeting enemies out at sea, flying high above the stratosphere, highly maneuverable enough to evade anti-missile defenses, and archiving hypersonic speeds of up to Mach 10 (or 10 times the speed of sound) in the terminal stage. China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile 1080pHD video: youtube.com/watch?v=p-cEunmqXM8
    2
  12593.  @jessicaw8682  The closest term for "whateverworkism" is probably "pragmatism".
    2
  12594.  @danfisher7458  I only post when I have the free time to do so, what makes you think this is a full time job?
    2
  12595.  @mnbr6884  "神州 Shenzhou That's 1958 and only one country." Are you implying that whether it's 1958 or 2022, that Vietnam is allowed to change its mind as and when it pleases? Not just Vietnam alone, but the Americans had reminded the Philippines that Spratlys were not part of the Philippines as per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America. The Philippines, on the basis of historic right of title, claims that its territorial sea extends to the limits set forth in the colonial treaties, which define the extent of the archipelago at the time it was ceded from Spain to the U.S. in 1898. (Note: the border limits does not include the Spratly Islands as within Philippine territory) .... Source: ResearchGate: The Treaty Limits of the Philippines
    2
  12596. Turkiye: "Look at China, look at Russia, they are just issuing statements, they are just condemning, but the real thing is action. We should see something in practice." ... Meanwhile, Turkiye continues to allow oil to flow to Israel.
    2
  12597. I think it's important to learn another language, regardless of the choice.
    2
  12598.  @zackk4969  If that's really the case, then why is China currently the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people? What's the name the renowned Chinese writer in Chinese characters?
    2
  12599. US Government Credit Rating has just recently been downgraded.
    2
  12600.  @christopherkucinski2383  Japanese eat raw uncooked fish that contains bacteria and they eat live uncooked octopus tentacles in comparison to Chinese cooked food. You're just anti-China that's all.
    2
  12601.  @christopherkucinski2383  Why do you want Chinese people to overthrow our government? That would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, making our country vulnerable to invasion like when Japan invaded China during Sino-Japanese War. You're just anti-China that's all and you care absolutely nothing for China's interests nor do you wish to see China succeed.
    2
  12602. Why can't Muslims support China over India? Look at what India is doing to Pakistan for example. In comparison, the Chinese government helps Muslims to go on their pilgrimage. Source:Chinese government goes to great lengths to help Muslims go on the Hajj dailymailnews.com/2017/08/15/chinese-government-goes-to-great-lengths-to-help-muslims-go-on-the-hajj/
    2
  12603. During Dalai Lama rule over Tibet, Tibet was backward and brutal theocracy, where 95% of population were slaves and the 5% elite were slave owners, but under Chinese government, Tibet was modernized and Chinese workers built infrastructure, roads, streetlamps, houses, schools, universities, hospitals, and granted homes running water, gas and electricity. Tibetans and Uighurs today have access to modern technology, like cars, smartphones, computers, the Internet, WiFi, mobile phone coverage (even in such remote region) And look at what Indian Army did in Kashmir. "The frequent rape of Kashmiri Muslim women by Indian state security forces routinely goes unpunished. Many women have become victims of rape and sexual assault in the conflict." And you still think: "Exactly. That's why I don't understand why Muslims hate India and support China." But go on, label me as dishonest and ignorant, because I am Chinese and therefore "brainwashed". You apparently seen my comments before, and I put plenty of thought and logic into them and quote examples, but because I am Chinese and therefore, viewed as ignorant and dishonest by you. Jai Hind! जय हिन्द !
    2
  12604.  @googlerwunn7344  You asked "Do you know what a spoiled brat is?" Someone who refuses to answer questions, while constantly demanding answers out of others. Someone who can't even refute simple arguments like Americans (majority of them anyway) are responsible for electing their politicians into power, for example. You said: "Spoiled brats are the enemy of China." Agreed. You asked: "Do you know why I'm asking you all these silly questions?" Because such behavior is reminiscent of a spoiled brat?
    2
  12605.  @googlerwunn7344  If you want your questions answered, then why not answer my questions? I mean, I asked first, yet you respond to my questions with more questions?
    2
  12606.  @googlerwunn7344  Didn't I previously told you where I was from?
    2
  12607.  @hudziszeq  "神州 Shenzhou Go spreading your CCP propaganda in China, nobody believes you here." Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself? Western anti-China propaganda is poisoning their audiences minds about China, even when many of them never actually set foot in China at all.
    2
  12608. Cyrus Janssen is preaching exactly about the so-called "freedom given by the USA" being taken away through this behavior towards TikTok. Whatever happened to the concept of a "free market" in the USA? If they can't adhere to their own principles then they have no right to question China's policies.
    2
  12609.  @theWebmasterify  You said: "I love China, its hard working people and culture, but it saddens my heart when I see those people suffering because the CCP and local officials messed up and that they then don't have the balls to be honest and help as much as they can." There's plenty of footage of Chinese rescue workers and People's Liberation Army soldiers helping out the flood affected regions in Zhengzhou as best they can. Otherwise, how else do you think they could've done better? .... You said: "but rather try to keep their face, lie about death counts (have you seen the flooded tunnel video and the covered buses? I'm sure you did), " By now, we all seen the flooded tunnel video and the covered buses yes, but how does that serve as evidence that the CPC is intentionally lying about death counts? Did you counted more bodies than what was reported? ... You said: "and intentionally not warn people when they opened the dams, because they didn't want to pay compensation." The PLA has warned local people of possible dam collapse, what makes you think local people weren't warned when they open the dams? Opening the dams is to prevent the collapse of the dam (which would result in more deaths) so isn't releasing flood waters to prevent dam collapse a better option?
    2
  12610.  @adoreslaurel  About the South China Sea, China first claimed the South China Sea Islands back in 1947, when Republic of China 🇹🇼 published the 11 Dash Line (of which the 9 Dash Line by People's Republic of China 🇨🇳) is based upon and nobody objected to China's claim. Not Vietnam, not the Philippines, not even the USA. The US Navy even gave American warships to ROC, such as the USS Decker which was renamed ROCS Taiping (太平) by Chinese Navy to help China liberate the South China Sea Islands from Japanese occupation. One of the South China Sea Islands was even renamed Taiping Island, in honor of the warship that liberated it. The North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had also formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    2
  12611.  @adoreslaurel  What makes you think Chinese people are completely locked out from the rest of the world? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationthailand.com/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    2
  12612.  @adoreslaurel  I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion:Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience) So many expats in China are visiting Xinjiang, have recorded and posted their experience in Xinjiang on YouTube, what makes you think foreigners can't visit Xinjiang and see how prosperous the region is becoming?
    2
  12613. +Aubrey Fletcher The British did not grant Hong Kong people any rights. I mean, when did Hong Kong held any elections of its own, while under British rule? Only after Hong Kong broke free of British rule, did the Hong Kong people finally held elections of their own, so why are you claiming "where they still have rights from Britain"
    2
  12614. Traditional Chinese Medicine also takes a more holistic approach to cure illness, such as taking into account the liver, the kidneys, and other organs, because TCM sees the entire human body as a whole. Whereas Western doctors often prescribe antibiotics to combat common flu, but it also kills the good bacteria in the body as well as weakening the human immune system.
    2
  12615.  @abyyy490  Taiwan’s total troop strength, which stood at 164,000 in 2021, saw reductions of 5,492 personnel in 2022, 4,706 in 2023, and 1,801 in the first half of 2024. Projections for fiscal year 2025 indicate a further decline of 5,486 personnel — equivalent to about 11 battalions. If these trends continue, Taiwan’s active-duty force could drop to approximately 145,000 troops.
    2
  12616.  @abyyy490  Countries by patent applications (2023) 1. China (1,642,582) 2. USA (518,791) 3. Japan (414,479) 4. South Korea (288,001) 5. Germany (133,140) ... Countries by trademark applications (2023) 1. China (7,417,473) 2. USA (849,951) 3. Russia (543,692) 4. India (496,326) 5. Germany (441,310) ... Countries by industrial design applications (2023) 1. China (882,809) 2. USA (69,076) 3. Germany (64,986) 4. Italy (60,486) 5. South Korea (60120) ... (Source: World Intellectual Property Indicators)
    2
  12617. +唐詩 唐詩 "神州 Shenzhou But what you've said above is not what China really said nor Taiwan" According to the following source in 2014, President Xi Jinping brought up the idea of "One Country, Two Systems" Policy to then Taiwanese President Ma Ying-jeou. But President Ma flatly rejected the idea, saying it was "unacceptable" because it would cost the island its sovereignty. While Xi stressed that peaceful reunification and the "one country, two systems" formula were the best ways to bridge the cross-strait political divide, he also hinted at flexibility. He said that before applying the formula, Beijing would "fully consider the real situation in Taiwan, opinions and suggestions from various sectors of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and take into account benefits and other arrangements for Taiwanese people". In a statement hours later, Ma refused to accept the suggestion, saying Taiwan - as the Republic of China - had been a sovereign country for 103 years, and "the government insists on maintaining the status quo of no reunification, no independence and no use of force" as well as the "1992 consensus that allows the two sides to have a separate interpretation of the term of China". Source: 'One country, two systems' right formula for Taiwan, Xi Jinping reiterates scmp.com/news/china/article/1601307/one-country-two-systems-right-formula-taiwan-xi-jinping-reiterates
    2
  12618. +PRCseparatedChina Taiwan The Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China 中华人民共和国香港特别行政区基本法 was adopted on 4 April 1990 by the Seventh National People's Congress and signed by President Yang Shangkun, so why do you claim there was no this law during the handover? China has not changed this HK law for 50 years, so why are you claiming things that you yourself can't even backup?
    2
  12619. +Jonathan Swarnapati Your grandfather is the older generation of people in Taiwan, not the younger generation.
    2
  12620. +Kaleidoscope Both N. Korea and S. Korea agreed to participate in the 2018 Winter Olympics in PyeongChang and they even sent a single unified team at the 2018 World Team Table Tennis Championships. So how is this not a sign that they regard the possibility of a unified Korea, instead of 2 different countries? As for Hong Kong, under Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 香港基本法第四十五條: -The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government So what is China doing wrong in Hong Kong? The HK Chief Executive is elected by an Election Committee (consisting of HK businesses and groups) and all Beijing does is to approve the candidates that's all.
    2
  12621. +Kaleidoscope Since when is the Olympic team the result of Trump? The unified Korean team was because South Korean President Moon approach North Korean Kim Jung-Un in Pyongyang, not because of of Trump. And who says both side can only achieve unification only when one of them give up their governing regime? Look at Hong Kong handover to China, and we allowed One-Country Two-Systems, allowing Hong Kong to keep their own government and for the mainland to keep ours. You claim Democracy is vulnerable? Then surely its a sign that democracy is not the best system for governance isn't it? Why then continue such vulnerable system? Your system's flaw is your system's flaw. Also, that's apart of China's agreement with Britain during the Hong Kong handover and according to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條) "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." So all Beijing does it approve the HK candidates that are elected by the Election Committee. I mean, the most basic element of democracy, is that people get to vote for their favorite leader, and as far as I know, the HK Chief Executive is voted in by HK. For example, HK's current Chief Executive Carrie Lam 林鄭月娥 won the 2017 Chief Executive election with 777 votes of the 1200 votes, so in the end it is HK that does the voting not China.
    2
  12622.  @brandonjohnson4849  A lot of nations also do business in Hong Kong and Macau too, so what's the difference? And USA still hasn't formally recognized Taiwan. Although Beijing formally protests the selling of US arms to Taiwan, China has also been actively wooing the Taiwan in reunification, through economic means, by attracting millions of unemployed undergraduates from Taiwan to seek jobs in the mainland. Thus, there is a certain risk that China is able to convince Taiwan that reunification is better than conflict. Then its possible that US weapons in Taiwan would end up in our possession, which is something USA does not want, because USA banned sales of US weapons to China. Thus, the USA is restricted to selling low grade weapons to Taiwan to avoid this risk of its weapons falling into our hands.
    2
  12623. Meanwhile, Putin is not a gangster, but the democratically elected president of Russia.
    2
  12624. Ukraine's next election is already overdue. Meanwhile, Russia has successfully conducted its election.
    2
  12625.  @heromixzen6941  There's other candidates on the ballot paper as well as international observers monitoring the election. How's that not an election?
    2
  12626. What's wrong with China having a Wall? Isn't the Great Wall of China part of Chinese history and culture?
    2
  12627.  @gmw3083  Yes, the sensorship is getting worst here and sorry for spamming. But at least 1 comment got through.
    2
  12628. Another was to believe that America is their ally.
    2
  12629.  @brendagordon4571  Now that at least 300 seats in Hong Kong government consist of pro-democracy members, then shouldn't the anti-government protestors cease their protesting? After all, the government now has majority pro-democracy, so shouldn't the Hong Kong protests stop?
    2
  12630.  @mitobozillman6067  Many of those pro-democracy candidate voted into those 300+ seats are politically inexperienced (some even admitted to being first-timers) so they're going to to be in for a difficult time governing Hong Kong (especially cleaning up the mess left behind by the HK protestors and rioters)
    2
  12631.  Conscience Observer  My source is from Western news source and actual witnesses in Tiananmen Square during the night of June 1989. Here's another source by Jay Mathews, a reporter for The Washington Post and he says: "The problem is this: as far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square." Source: The Myth of Tiananmen https://archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php
    2
  12632.  @Darkademic  "Not even the official Chinese statistics claim that no student protesters died." Which student protestors died that night on June 3rd and 4th 1989? According to my source from Jay Mathews of The Washington Post : _Most of the hundreds of foreign journalists that night, including me, were in other parts of the city or were removed from the square so that they could not witness the final chapter of the student story. Those who tried to remain close filed dramatic accounts that, in some cases, buttressed the myth of a student massacre._
    2
  12633.  @Darkademic  But which of those figures are actually "student protestors" and how many of them died in Tiananmen Square on the night of 3rd and 4th June 1989? Because there exists various accounts that while tanks did indeed entered Tiananmen Square, the students were eventually allowed to leave the Square peacefully. There are many false witness accounts which were later proven wrong. For example: a Qinghua University student described machine guns mowing down students in front of the Monument to the People’s Heroes in the middle of the square. The New York Times gave this version prominent display on June 12, just a week after the event, but NO EVIDENCE was ever found to confirm the account or verify the existence of the alleged witness. Another account: Student leader Wu’er Kaixi said he had seen 200 students cut down by gunfire, but it was later proven that he left the square several hours before the events he described allegedly occurred. (So the student left before the supposed massacre) CBS correspondent Richard Roth’s story of being arrested and removed from the scene refers to “powerful bursts of automatic weapons, raging gunfire for a minute and a half that lasts as long as a nightmare.” Black and Munro quote a Chinese eyewitness who says the gunfire was from army commandos shooting out the student loudspeakers at the top of the monument. So the gunfire was from commandos shooting out the student's loudspeakers at the top of the monument, not that students are being shot at.
    2
  12634.  @runninggames771  I have seen you're source and there is no indication that the students were in Tiananmen Square like you are claiming. Tiananmen Square is a huge flat square with no trees in the background so where exactly was this footage supposedly taken? Also, I see a burning bus in the background and it could be the the one being described in my source: Let's go back to those photos of the burning buses. The popular view is that they were torched by angry protesters after the shooting began. In fact they were torched before. The evidence? Reports of charred corpses being strung up beneath overpasses (one photographed by Reuters remains unpublished), and photos of badly burned soldiers seeking shelter in nearby houses. Soldiers in that kind of situation tend to go out with guns blazing – just ask the good citizens of Fallujah, Iraq. And why do these so called student protestors have access to Molotov cocktails? Who's been supplying these kids with weapons of rioters?
    2
  12635.  @thejeffinvade  "the majority of the killing happened by troops pushing its way into the square." Do you have proof of your claims? Because all verified witnesses (including Jay Mathews himself) agreed that the student protestors in Tiananmen Square were allowed to leave peacefully that night on June 4 1989.
    2
  12636.  @thejeffinvade  So, why were highschool kids blocking the entrance to Tiananmen Square then? They're so young, yet they already think they somehow know how to govern the whole country already? Better than Deng Xiaoping? And why were there buses set on fire? Who give highschool students weapons like Molotov cocktails?
    2
  12637.  @thejeffinvade  So you're saying People's Liberation Army soldiers had such excellent marksmanship and night vision, that they would shoot a highschool girl, standing inside the building next to a window? Your story sounds made up in order to garner sympathy. And if the tank's orders were to enter Tiananmen Square, then why would they shoot a girl in a building then?
    2
  12638.  @thejeffinvade  Once again, your story about PLA troops shooting at a highschool girl onlooker in a building sounds extremely fishy, given that PLA tanks were ordered into the square according to you. There's a lot of fake stories made up by anti-China Western propaganda.
    2
  12639.  @thejeffinvade  "it's Deng's duty to do a better job at governing" How much better of a job could Deng possibly do? Herealized China's communist market just wasn't working out, so he switched to capitalist market and look how far China prospered under his lead. And yet this students somehow think that they know how to govern a country as large as China?
    2
  12640.  @thejeffinvade  Those PLA soldiers in the truck were shooting into the air (warning shots) so how is that considered getting shot at? If soldiers on a truck (higher elevation from the street) are aiming at fleeing people, then their weapons would be pointing downward, not upward isn't it? Why you don't stop to consider the actual situation first? Like I said earlier, why would PLA troops shoot the head of a little girl in a building window, while at night in darkness? You don't even make sense with your logic, yet you are telling me to face facts?
    2
  12641.  @thejeffinvade  "神州 Shenzhou The prosperity that Chinese people achieved in the past 30 years can't justify the bloodshed." You want to talk about bloodshed? Since 1989, there have been no more major riots in China since then and Had China adopted democracy, there will still be ongoing bloodshed because of riots and further loss of lives. Look at India (world's largest democracy) for example and they have riots nearly every year, resulting in more blood shed over 30 years. Source: List of riots in India wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_riots_in_India But how many major riots China have after 1989? None! So why you claim the bloodshed is not justified then?
    2
  12642.  @TulekBehar  Ukraine has been supporting ultra-nationalists, neo-nazis (such as the Azov Battalion) who've been genociding the ethnic Russians living in the Donetsk and Luhansk region (collectively known as Donbas). Over the course of 8 years, there's been shelling (by both sides) resulting in the deaths of 14,000 civilians, of which 80% are in Donbas region. Putin is not starting a war, he's putting to an end to one that was set in motion since the 2014 coup d'etat of the Ukrainian government by the United States and installing their own puppet government after the coup.
    2
  12643. Outwardly, USA expressed support for Japan dumping irradiated Fukushima waters. But inwardly, USA has maintained a ban on imports of farming and seafood products from the region near Fukushima. Yet JaYoe Nation thinks Chinese are just being racist against Japanese, when the real two-faced racist is outwardly supporting Japan's decision, but inwardly banning seafood imports from Fukushima?
    2
  12644.  @mlight6845  Because it's not two countries. Taiwan island inalienable part of China, even Australian recognise the One China policy then what's the message of Australia sailing warships through the Taiwan Strait? Also, China gave advance notice of the live fire exercise, what do you mean it was done without warning?
    2
  12645. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of the West being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th Century, many have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western domanance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the USA someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    2
  12646.  @tjallingdalheuvel126  The colonizers not only colonized lands, but they also colonized the local people's minds, through cultural interaction and education systems. Even after the colonizer left, the local people's minds remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. This is the essence of the colonial mentality that continues to affect people living in the former colonies.
    2
  12647.  @hangtuah888  He's not talking about "Marilyn Monroe".
    2
  12648. Why are you calling it by it's improper name? It's proper name is Covid-19 as designated by WHO, not Chinese Virus.
    2
  12649.  @JDManiacSport  No one knows the exact origin of the coronavirus. There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    2
  12650.  @MarkYeung1  "Taiwan also modernized that way." Like I said earlier, Taiwan's modernization occurred under authoritarian single-party rule of the Kuomintang. For decades, the KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, and imposed martial law for 38 years (which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time). Political dissenters in Taiwan were imprisoned or killed by the KMT during this period in Taiwan known as White Terror (白色恐怖). Yet under authoritarian single-party rule, Taiwan rapidly modernized and its economy flourished, It's when Western-style democracy was introduced to Taiwan in the 1990s, that Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Today, Taiwan's economy has stagnated. Taiwan's wages are stagnant, their cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are gradually seeking jobs overseas such as in mainland China. "Taiwan's GDP is almost 3 times than that of mainland China." Taiwan's GDP WAS almost 3 times that of mainland China. Today, mainland China has the 2nd largest economy in the world, with a GDP of $17.96 trillion, whereas Taiwan's GDP is ranked 21st in the world at $791.61 billion.
    2
  12651.  @MarkYeung1  "Taiwan has been democratic for 30 years already." But as mentioned, Taiwan's modernization occurred under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, not under Western-style democracy. In fact, Taiwan's economic growth became more modest in 1990s after Western-style democracy was introduced. You said: "The economy has been doing well." Taiwan's economic growth has stagnated. Wages are stagnant and according to surveys, 9 in 10 workers in Taiwan are not satisfied with their salaries. It also doesn't help that the cost of living in Taiwan is rising and some young Taiwanese are resorting to buying near-expired food (at a discount) in order to cope with the soaring cost of living.
    2
  12652.  @MarkYeung1  "Taiwan's GDP is still 3 times that compare with the mainland." You're wrong. Taiwan's GDP is only $791.61 billion whereas mainland China's GDP is $17.96 trillion USD, so how does that make Taiwan's GDP 3 times that of the mainland's? Where did you learn your mathematics? Also, according to the New York Times, there are approximately 1 million to 2 million Taiwanese — nearly 10% of the island's population — are estimated to live and work on the mainland.
    2
  12653. ​ @MarkYeung1  Take smartphones for example, and mainland China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, OPPO, Vivo, Realme, Transsion, Honor etc. Top 10 best mobile brands in the world in 2024 1. Samsung (South Korean) 2. Apple (American) 3. Xiaomi (Chinese) 4. Vivo (Chinese) 5. Transsion (Chinese) 6. OPPO (Chinese) 7. Honor (Chinese) 8. Motorola (Chinese) 9. Realme (Chinese) 10. Huawei (Chinese) ... Source: Top 10 best mobile brands in the world in 2024 by 91 Mobiles But where are the famous smartphone brands from Taiwan island?
    2
  12654.  @ubermenschen3636  serpentza claims he knows more about China than Chinese, because serpentza and c-milk spent months motor-biking across the country, while Chinese are busy studying or working.
    2
  12655.  @isaacvitela5131  You said: "Simply getting the collar on sri lanka and its economy is all they need" If you look at the pie chart of who owns Sri Lanka's debt, their debt is mostly owned by market borrowings (39%), Asian Development Bank (14%), Japan (12%), World Bank (11%), China (10%), India (2%) and others (11%) according to the Sri Lanka Ministry of Finance. So China only makes up 10% of Sri Lanka's debt, while the remaining 90% is owned by the West (including Japan and India) then how is it China getting the collar on Sri Lanka?
    2
  12656.  @Cueil  You asked "is there any country the belt and road has actually helped besides china?" The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is the flagship project of Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). The very latest development recorded shows that Pakistan’s exports to China crossed $1.605 billion in the first five months of 2022, up 5.42% year on year and a meta-analysis research study shows that CPEC has generated 80,000 jobs so far in different projects commenced since 2013, and has a potential to create a total of 1.2 million direct jobs through its currently agreed projects.
    2
  12657.  @revenants.6992  "Sri Lanka would like a word with you" According to the Sri Lanka Ministry of Finance, Sri Lanka's debt is mostly owned by market borrowings (39%), Asian Development Bank (14%), Japan (12%), World Bank (11%), China (10%), India (2%) and others (11%). What is it about Sri Lanka that they would like to have a word with me?
    2
  12658.  @7coyotl772  You said: "how are they gonna fund it when china's banks are failing robbing their own people of money they had for years" Firstly, China is home to many of the world's largest banks such as China Construction Bank, ICBC, AgBank, Bank of China, Postal Savings Bank of China, Bank of Communications, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank (China), China Minsheng Bank, Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, China CITIC Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Huaxia Bank, Bank of Beijing, China Guangfa Bank, Bank of Shanghai, Bank of Jiangsu, China Zheshang Bank_ and many more! ... Source: Wikipedia: List of largest banks So you're saying every one of those banks are robbing people of money they had for years? Secondly, assuming what you said is true, then doesn't it imply that those banks now have to money to fund those projects in Africa and other developing countries? So how does your logic make sense?
    2
  12659.  @7coyotl772  You said: "Chinas been putting on a front forever obviously coping the western format of trying to expand getting rid of all ethnic groups in Asia that isn't han Chinese" If that was really the case, then why is it ethnic minorities in China aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) and they can have as many kids as they want? In fact, the ethnic minority proportion of the population in China has grown from 6.1% in 1953, to 8.04% in 1990, 8.41% in 2000, and 8.49% in 2010.
    2
  12660.  @sirvidia  They are citizens of China, so they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (world's most spoken language by number of speakers) Chinese history and singing patriotic songs about China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth and they learn English at school, American history and sing patriotic songs about America. I mean, America consists of Caucasian Americans (white), African Americans (black), Hispanic/Latin Americans (brown), Asian Americans (yellow) and Native Americans (red). Despite their different "colours," they are all Americans aren't they?
    2
  12661. Jimmy Kimmel tests American passers-by on the street if they can name a country on the world map. Video: Can You Name a Country? youtu.be/kRh1zXFKC_o
    2
  12662.  Molly Wop Chainsaw  "神州 Shenzhou In 1983 during the Cold War with the Soviets America almost got nuked." Yeah, almost like you said. But China is not the Soviet Union, in 1964 the government signed a "No First Use" policy regarding nuclear weapons. This means that China will not preemptively strike any country with nukes, unless we are ourselves struck with nukes first. Source: No First Use wikipedia.org/wiki/No_first_use
    2
  12663.  Giovanni Sanchez  I disagree with the nuclear war claim, because back during the Cold War, the USA and USSR were at loggerheads, yet there was no hot nuclear war (although it came close during Cuban missile crisis). Today's USA and China's relations weren't as bad as during the Cold War, where there was really almost no contact at all. In fact, today's society is very interconnected, and this makes it harder for a hot nuclear war to surface
    2
  12664.  @everythingandmore5537  Why do you want Chinese people to overthrow our government? The CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China?
    2
  12665.  Giovanni Sanchez  What changed your mind?
    2
  12666.  @everythingandmore5537  "神州 Shenzhou Why not put a vote to ordinary Chinese." A long term Harvard University study has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. Source: Harvard survey finds Chinese satisfaction with govt rises china.org.cn/china/2020-07/17/content_76281590.htm
    2
  12667. The most salient thing is that Meng is finally released and put on the first flight back to China. Some level of compromise by all sides is necessary in order to reach an agreement to secure Meng's return back to China.
    2
  12668. Isn't cutting off water, food and electricity to Gaza considered a crime?
    2
  12669. China is 1st country in the world to successfully mount an electromagnetic railgun onto a mobile platform, like a navy vessel, and to have successfully test-fired it out at sea. Even the USA is unable to get its experimental railgun out of its land testing facility and onto actual sea trials.
    2
  12670.  @chrishamlin5863  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last conflict in 1979. On the other hand, the US is involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Afghan War, even in the 21st century.
    2
  12671. Taiwan politics is complicated and its political parties are color coded, with BLUE representing parties in favor of eventual reunion with the mainland (such as KMT) and GREEN representing parties in favor of independence (such as DPP). Therefore, not everyone in Taiwan wants independence, since people can always change their votes from DPP to KMT and back and forth. So people can't just make blanket statements that all Taiwan people want independence.
    2
  12672. On the other hand, not many Americans are being encouraged to explore the China forests. Chinese probably know more about America than Americans do about China.
    2
  12673. There needs to be more of such logical, rational ways to view China in the West, apart from what Western MSM is offering.
    2
  12674.  @MarkYeung1  China and India currently have not declared any war with each other. And Indian PM Narendra Modi publicly stated that "Chinese troops did not enter Indian territory," so what Chinese aggression are you talking about? Video: ‘China didn’t enter our territory…’: PM Modi at all-party meet on Ladakh clash youtu.be/eLlkDGaz6gU
    2
  12675.  @nicolew9604  老实说翻墙之后就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  12676.  @DontUputThatEvilOnMe  Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    2
  12677.  @DontUputThatEvilOnMe  Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    2
  12678.  @silverjuly9339  People like to believe negative rumours, like many Westerners readily believe negative news about China, but why is it that when I speak about positive achievements of China, many Westerners aren't likely to believe it?
    2
  12679.  @tammystewart10  Elon Musk recently opened Tesla's first overseas "giga-factory" in Shanghai not too long ago. China also sold more light-duty plug-in EVs than any other in the world. Top-selling light-duty plug-in electric vehicle global markets 1. China (7,861) 2. Europe (5,647) 3. United States (2,349) 4. Germany (1,382) 5. California (1,072) 6. France (786) 7. United Kingdom (747) 8. Norway (647) 9. The Netherlands (390) 10. Sweden (356) 11. Japan (349) ... Source: Wikipedia: Electric car use by country
    2
  12680.  @EstanislaoSantino-xk8uz  If we were blind to it, then why are we talking about their wrong doings here on YouTube?
    2
  12681. That's why you have state-controlled corporations in China. To prevent those two problems from occurring.
    2
  12682. One of NASA's Skylab solar panels also malfunctioned during its operation.
    2
  12683.  @Andy-P  You said: "They are allowed to protest in the UK." The Hong Kong protestor hung an insulting picture of President Xi Jinping at the entrance of the consular. This would be intolerable and unacceptable for any diplomatic and consular missions of any country. Therefore, the Chinese Consular condemns this deplorable act with strong indignation and firm opposition. However, violence should not be tolerated and the incident should be investigated. But until actual evidence emerges, shouldn't the Chinese consular be considered innocent until proven guilty under British law? What makes you think that the CPC are behind this? Do you have proof that the attackers are actual communist party members? Also, can you imagine a similar situation in which a protestor hunging up a insulting picture of the late Queen Elizabeth II? Oh right, anti-monarchy protestors were arrested by the British police, as the protestors shouted against the crown, heckled royals marching by and carried anti-monarchists signs — and in one case, a blank sheet of paper. So it's not really true when you said: "They are allowed to protest in the UK"
    2
  12684. China: Turning Cyberspace into Realspace. America: Turning Realspace into Cyberspace.
    2
  12685. The most common news about users' personal information being leaked stem from Western corporations like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram leaking their users data (sometimes even outright selling users data to buyers). China doesn't want that to happen in China, that's why the government is stepping up protection of users data.
    2
  12686.  @srytv1624  If you want to talk about prison incarceration, it's actually the United States of America that has the world's largest prison population. And what makes you think the Tibetans and Uighurs aren't living a happy life under the CPC? Have you actually been to Tibet Autonomous Region and Xinjiang and seen what life is for them?
    2
  12687.  @srytv1624  "神州 Shenzhou that doesn't approve china to build military islands" When Vietnam built the first airstrip on the Spratly Islands in 1976, the United States didn't raise any alarm bells. Two years later, the Philippines built its airstrip on Thitu Island in 1978 and still, the US overlooked it. China is actually a late-comer to building airstrips in the SCS, yet you're singling out China?
    2
  12688. Since its separated from UN agency, then it does not represent UN's view, since the Permanent Court of Arbitration is not an official UN agency. Also, about 60 countries worldwide have been identified to support China's stance (marked in RED) compared to 5-8 countries supporting Philippines stance (marked in BLUE) according to the following map. Source:Map of countries support China's stance over Philippines stance thediplomat.com/2016/07/who-supports-china-in-the-south-china-sea-and-why/
    2
  12689. China has been too kind to the Philippines. The Philippines intentionally grounded a vessel (Sierra Madre) onto the Second Thomas Shoal. China offered to help repair the vessel and get it back to the sea, but Philippines refused. Instead, Philippines sent supply ships to reinforce the decaying hull of the vessel in order to stake their claim.
    2
  12690.  @MarkYeung1  Mainland China holds the largest number of Hong Kong expatriates according to Wikipedia: Hong Konger.
    2
  12691.  @niyarao2962  Doctor can't help the patient now, the patient needs brain transplant.
    2
  12692.  @niyarao2962  Then why is Narendra Modi copying China's Made-in-China brand and wants to promote manufacturing in India with the Make-in-India label?
    2
  12693.  @niyarao2962  Besides smartphones, Chinese companies manufacture the best civilian drones in the world. Chinese company DJI is world's largest civilian drone-maker according to the following source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 top10drone.com/top-drone-companies/ But where are the famous companies from India compared to China?
    2
  12694.  @ActualJusticeWarrior  At 4:30 , why do you think China was better pre Communist Party? China was dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past under the Republic Of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) where China was divided into various warring provinces controlled by individual warlords and even Japan invaded China during this weak period of Chinese history. It was Mao Zedong and the Communists who succeeded in herculean task of reunifying our divided country and founded the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949.
    2
  12695. Agreed. Let the one who started the fire, be the one to put out the fire in the end.
    2
  12696.  @宋庆-i4m  What do you mean by "start a new country", if you agree that there is only One China? And whose territory are you using? If you're using China's territory in Hunan province then you'll have to fight the People's Liberation Army if you want to start acts of separatist in China.
    2
  12697. @反共 我从来没题到印度人，你跟我说着些话干嘛？
    2
  12698. After watching this, I believe United States secretly being controlled by warmongers who profit from involving USA in wars. 1. They profit from deployment of THAAD in S. Korea, so they encourage more deployment. 2. They profit from Iron Dome deployment in S. Korea, so they encourage more deployment. 3. They profit from sending tactical nuclear weapons to S.Korea, so they encourage it. 4. They profit from aircraft carrier strikegroup deployment in peaceful East Asian waters, so they encourage more deployment. 5. They profit from deploying long range strikecraft to Guam and Okinawa. ... ... All these deployment of military assets only goes into filling the pockets of these warmongers.
    2
  12699. Taka Masuda Japanese forces committed wartime atrocities during WW2 such as Rape of Nanjing, Unit 731 and "comfort" women. During Rape of Nanjing, Japanese solders butchered unarmed Chinese men for sport and many Chinese women were gang raped. Their bodies were left naked and mutilated, with their private parts bayonetted or having sharp sticks of bamboo shoved in. Young children and the elderly weren't spared, and Japanese soldiers cut open young children's bodies to rape them. Pregnant women had their swollen bellies bayoneted after being raped, and the unborn fetus ripped open from their wombs.
    2
  12700. About culture, look at Chinese culture today, and modern Chinese people adopt modern Western clothing, technology, buildings, etc. But do Chinese people suddenly feel our culture is losing or being threatened in any way? Cultures change throughout the course of history, and modern China is one example of that. Just like Westerners in the past adopted Chinese inventions, like paper, compass and especially gunpowder.
    2
  12701.  @tomtube1012  Not just in mainland China, but public order and social stability needed to be restored in Hong Kong, in order for economic growth to continue there. This is the basis of the National Security Law.
    2
  12702. KarlW Therefore people can't just say using Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, etc is banned and illegal in China. As for Chinese apps, in many ways they have surpassed American apps. For example, using WeChat, people can book appointments, hail a cab, shop online, make purchases, pay for it, have them delivered to your doorstep, etc, all using a single app. But you won't get this level of integration with Western apps like WhatsApp.
    2
  12703.  GTA and Apple channel  "神州 Shenzhou Chinese fool" Why resort to hurling personal insults against me for no reason?
    2
  12704.  @stunningandbrave2520  Defence industry engineers in southwestern China have built a small infrared search-and-track system that can pick up the heat signature of a fast-moving aircraft from 300 km.
    2
  12705.  @1210cool  According to eyewitness present in Tianamen Square Jun 1989, nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053
    2
  12706.  I'll figure it out  What's wrong with my name? I am Chinese so what's wrong with using Chinese username then?
    2
  12707.  @mety9042  "神州 Shenzhou China killed their own people in Mao revolution" It was during Chinese Civil War, so of course Chinese were killing Chinese. Just like in American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans. Or Vietnamese killing Vietnamese in Vietnam War. Or Koreans in Korean war, or any civil war for that matter.
    2
  12708. Many in Singapore still suffer from the "colonial mentality". Even though Singapore has been physically decolonized, the "decolonization of the mind" needs to happen in order to reverse the mental conditioning inflicted by the colonizers on the minds of the colonized. Only then can the people truly be free.
    2
  12709.  @toddfarkman2177  I watched Hollywood movies and there's a surprising lack of representation of Asian Americans in them in my opinion. The few roles starring Asian actors/actresses often get casted into stereotypical Asian roles like prostitutes, damsels in distress, awkward nerd boy, triad gang members etc. And the Asian male actors don't seem to "get the girl" it's oftentimes the Caucasian make lead that gets the girl in the end. Some Asian roles get casted by Caucasian actors/actresses portraying Asian people, such as the Scarlet Johanson as the protagonist in Ghost in the Shell. Or Tilda Swinton as "The Ancient One" in Marvel's "Doctor Strange" for example. It was Bruce Lee who attempted to break the mold Hollywood had imposed on Asian actors, and he was at most partially successful, but he has since passed away, and Hollywood stereotypes are reappearing with his absence.
    2
  12710.  @toddfarkman2177  If you watched any news about the Atlanta shooting of 8 people, then statistics show that there have been nearly 3,800 hate crimes against Asian Americans in 2020. I don't understand why some Americans are so reluctant to classify the crimes as racially-motivated, when it occurs to people of Asian descent. Why are you so quick to dismiss allegations of hate crimes against Asians? I remember in Atlanta there was a shooting of African American (Rayshard Brooks) by police officers and it was quick to be classified as racially motivated against people of African descent. But when majority of Asian Americans are the victims, suddenly it's easily dismissed as not a hate crime?
    2
  12711.  @bartonlee3594  No, Beijing distanced itself from him. As for Wolf Warrior diplomats, Western diplomats have made numerous inflammatory remarks regarding the Chinese territory of Taiwan and have gotten away with it, yet complain about Chinese diplomats?
    2
  12712.  @bartonlee3594  What kind of word is "obstained"? And you didn't even know that China abstained in the UN vote regarding the Crimea Referendum, then why'd you claim China voted in favor of it?
    2
  12713.  @item6931  India, the world's largest democracy did not vote to condemn Russia either. And what makes you think the conflict was unprovoked? It was because NATO was expanding eastwards right up to Russia's doorstep, yet you call it "completely unprovoked"?
    2
  12714.  @item6931  It's astonishing how now you keep on associating the CPC with Mongols, when earlier, whenever Taiwanese native aborigines are mentioned, you go the extra mile to differentiate them from Han Chinese. Now you're calling the CPC Mongols, then aren't you being somewhat racist in your comments? Also, the reality should be that Meng Wanzhou was first taken hostage by Canada. Canada eventually released Meng (since there was no named crime) and China eventually decided to release Spavor and Korvig as a gesture of good will. And who says Jack Ma is in prison? The latest news is that he's been made an honorary professor at a top Hong Kong University.
    2
  12715.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "神州 Shenzhou My friend, I totally agree with that statement. I have always rejected USA imperialism." Same here. I agree with this statement and am completely opposed to US Imperialism in whatever form it takes. You said: "Think about that YOU, too, can become a free-thinker with no boot on his neck." Every word I've spoken comes from my heart. What makes you seem to think I have a boot on my neck?
    2
  12716.  @item6931  My source is Reuters: Exclusive: U.S. warships sail near South China Sea islands claimed by Beijing (dated May 27, 2019) The U.S. officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Higgins guided-missile destroyer and the Antietam, a guided-missile cruiser, came within 12 nautical miles of the Paracel Islands, among a string of islets, reefs and shoals over which China has territorial disputes with its neighbors.
    2
  12717.  @item6931  Source: Business Insider (2020): The guided-missile destroyer USS Mustin sailed within 12 nautical miles of Woody Island and Pyramid Rock in the Parcel Islands during a freedom-of-navigation operation, CNN reported Thursday, citing a defense official.
    2
  12718.  @bartonlee3594  China is interested in peace, that's why President Xi listened to both Putin and Zelenskyy and offered to act as a mediator. In fact, China sent a peace talks delegation to visit Ukraine to hopefully bring about a peaceful resolution to the conflict.
    2
  12719.  @khangnguyenthaiduy9129  You said: "There is no denying that Sri Lanka has fallen in debt and the one that holds Sri Lanka debt is China." China holds only 10 percent of Sri Lanka's debt. The remaining 90 percent of Sri Lanka's debt is held by Japan, India and the West, yet you only single out China?
    2
  12720.  @khangnguyenthaiduy9129  So you're admitting that Sri Lanka stands to benefit in the long run by leasing Hambantota Port to Chinese companies to develop for 99 years? Then how is this similar to what Britain did to Hong Kong? What Britain did was colonisation, controlling every aspect of Hong Kong, including education, trade and politics, and it's done to an entire port city. Whereas Hambantota Port is merely leased to Chinese companies to develop.
    2
  12721.  @elenamoulin3252  "Why then is it ok for you to have Baltic states and Finland in NATO?..." Firstly, no, it is NOT OK for me. NATO is most certainly not a defensive organization and I am personally against any expansion of NATO. Secondly, I was responding to a statement to stop the conflict in Ukraine, and the only way to do that is to address Russia's security interests (which in this case, involves Ukraine) so it means no Ukraine entry into NATO.
    2
  12722.  @tomvanaarle2622  You said: "Any European country can choose to join NATO, that has allways been the case and still is," Really? Why can't Russia join NATO then? Russia is located in Europe after all and has submitted a request to join the organization.
    2
  12723.  @dutchtravelguy7306  You said: "Neither can Russia dictate what countries want to join which alliance." Yet Russia has to preserve its own security interests. So if your country chooses to join a military alliance that is hostile towards Russia, then don't be surprised if military actions are taken towards your country. The same thing happened when the Soviet Union put missiles in Cuba so close to USA.
    2
  12724.  @SoulfulInspirations-xz6kk  You said: "Strange how it's only Ukraine’s entry into NATO that is problematic for Putin. When the resource poor Lithuania and Finland joined there was no problem." Russia is the largest country by landmass. Russia already has more resources like oil, gas and minerals than it knows what to do with, for what reason would they want more resources? Ukraine is the 2nd largest country in Europe (after Russia) so its entry into NATO would enable the deployment of missiles to such a wide expanse at Russia's border and posing a threat to Russia's security interests.
    2
  12725.  @elenamoulin3252  Ukraine's security and territorial integrity would have been secured had it chosen NOT to join NATO and threaten Russia's security interests.
    2
  12726.  @joseglenn20  China has inducted the world's first operational anti-ship ballistic missile, a "carrier killer" capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, known as the DF-21D. The DF-21D is capable of targeting aircraft carrier strike groups out in the open ocean, from the safety of the land. DF-21D is capable of carry both nuclear or conventional warheads, launching from land-based mobile launcher, flying up high above the stratosphere, using its advanced maneuverability to avoid incoming anti-missile defences from below and it's even capable of last-minute terminal guidance, making minute adjustments to its trajectory at hypersonic speeds, just seconds before impact.
    2
  12727.  @kelvinpang438  According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore (Source: hrw.org/asia/singapore ) "Singapore’s political environment is stifling. Citizens face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. In 2017, the country tightened the already strict limits on public assemblies contained in the Public Order Act, which requires police permits for any “cause-related” assembly outside the closely monitored “Speakers’ Corner.”" - Human Rights Watch: Singapore Now doesn't that sound similar to China's form of government? Singapore been ruled by authoritarian single-party PAP for over 50 years, just like China been ruled by authoritarian single-party CCP for 70 years.
    2
  12728.  @sethtan6306  Exactly, Singapore’s authoritarian single-party PAP dictatorship provides economic stability for Singapore and that's why Singapore is so prosperous despite being in a stifling political environment for over 50 years. Just like China is prosperous under authoritarian single-party CCP rule for 70 years. I heard in Singapore, you can get arrested for gathering in groups of 4 or more on grounds of illegal assembly.
    2
  12729.  @sethtan6306  Did I lament the lack of Western democracy? I have been saying all along that Singapore’s system is similar to China's political system all along. Isn't it obvious in my previous comments? You're the one rashly jumping to your own conclusions, and putting words in my mouth when I never said such things.
    2
  12730.  @jimmychow9092  I've seen those Hong Kong rioters and they resort to violence, arsonism, vandalism, hurling petrol bombs, breaking building windows, security cameras, traffic lights, and damaging HK MTR stations, setting shops on fire and planting improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and stabbing policemen in the neck. The Hong Kong Police are the ones maintaining peace and order in Hong Kong, not those violent Hong Kong rioters.
    2
  12731. American presidents can only make short-term plans for America, because they will eventually have to step down when their term limits are over, after 4-8 years, so they can't make long-term plans for USA spanning, say 10 years or more. On the other hand, Chinese government has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's direction and future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc, and to set specific goals for China to achieve. By abolishing the presidential term limit, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come into fruition in the future.
    2
  12732. Mao Zedong seized the lands from the corrupt landlords (i.e Kuomintang) and redistributed the land to the peasantry,
    2
  12733.  @tbz707  I watched serpentza's video and if the email leak was true, that means that Cyrus Janssen had previously published his video entitled: "Americans Don't Know The Truth About China" and that CGTN approached him to ask for permission to publish HIS video on their CGTN website. Then how is he being paid by the Chinese government to influence people wrong when it was CGTN that published his video with his permission?
    2
  12734. @mav "神州 Shenzhou oh.. the 100s of secret facilities in.china aren't ?" What secret facilities are you talking about? BBC journalists visited the re-education centres in Xinjiang and couldn't find anything amiss. The trainees can even go home during the weekends.
    2
  12735.  @abbotsful  "神州 Shenzhou if he's getting paid by the CPC to make content favourable to the CPC..." But Cyrus Janssen made his video first and it was CGTN that approached Cyrus to ask for permission to publish HIS video (entitled: "Americans Don't Know The Truth About China" ) on their CGTN website, so he wasn't paid to make those videos. You seemingly gotten the timeline mixed up here.
    2
  12736.  @abbotsful  Since Cyrus Janssen has denied it in his latest video (with his email as evidence) then do you actually have evidence that he was paid?
    2
  12737.  @abbotsful  "神州 Shenzhou yep same tactic, say something anti CPC, get taken and held incommunicado until you agree to make some ** statement." I remember back when anti-China trolls were demanding "Where's Fan Bingbing?" and she later reappeared issuing a statement that she's was being investigated earlier and has been fined for tax evasion. Later the anti-China trolls switched to "Where's Jack Ma?" and now that Jack Ma has reappeared in the public view, they switch to a different target now. It's the same tactic that's proven ineffective again and again by such anti-China trolls.
    2
  12738.  @abbotsful  How would you know whether their statements are bul**hit? What anti-CPC statement did Fan Bingbing say, you tell me?
    2
  12739.  @abbotsful  Why don't you tell me exactly what anti-CPC statement that Fan Bingbing said? I mean, you claimed that it was the same tactic and are seemingly accusing me of being gullible, then can't you quote me Fan Bingbing's anti-CPC statement like you claimed?
    2
  12740.  @abbotsful  So your comment was deleted? That means that censorship does exist on Western social platforms like YouTube after all, yet so many Westerner's I talked to boasted of "freedom of speech" and lack of censorship on Western social platforms. As for Peng Shuai, it turns out that IOC had an video call with her. It turns out that she's fine and she wants her privacy to be respected. Yet Western media would appear to have none of that, and are trying to expose her private life for all the world to see, instead of respecting her privacy.
    2
  12741.  @abbotsful  "A channel or platform owner can decide what they want on the channel they own." So it appears that your dissatisfaction is with YouTube policy itself? It is clearly within Cyrus Janssen's right to delete comments on his channel (as per YouTube policy) but you said "Note: it wasn't deleted by youtube but by Cyrus or someone he is working with, given the speed and accuracy of the censorship," but how does Cyrus Janssen have the time to accurately find your comment and delete it? It's nearly humanly impossible, it's more likely that YouTube deleted your comment, not Cyrus Janssen or someone he is working with. How exactly does someone he's working with even delete comments on his channel?
    2
  12742.  @abbotsful  "Why can't she talk to the WTA, that's the league she plays in." The WTA have an anti-China stance and it's very likely that had Peng Shuai talked to WTA, they would blow the issue even further out of proportion and make it political, instead of respecting her personal privacy, that's one reason why. "what's happening with the case against Zhang Gaoli?" Again, this is the same tactic I mentioned earlier, of anti-China trolls demanding "Where's Fan Bingbing?" or "Where's Jack Ma?" or "Where's Peng Shuai?" switching to a new name each time. It's obvious that such people are doing such things because of their anti-China stance.
    2
  12743.  @abbotsful  "神州 Shenzhou exactly, he is working with some arm of the CPC. I normally wouldn't go so far as to make such an accusation but it's the only answer I can see." Again, how exactly can someone he's allegedly working for with even delete comments on his channel? And earlier, you said it's because of the speed, but how can Cyrus possibly delete your comments so quickly, when it's not even humanly possible? It's impossible for Cyrus to monitor his comment thread 24/7 and delete your comment near instantaneously, it has to be YouTube itself. And mind you, since you claim "A channel or platform owner can decide what they want on the channel they own." that means you are apparently disatisfied with YouTube policy itself since it is within Cyrus' means to delete comments (as permitted by YouTube policy).
    2
  12744.  @abbotsful  "Why would youtube delete a link to a youtube video?" Why not? Some YouTube videos are demonetized (for various reasons) and YouTube sees no incentive to allow links to YT videos that aren't monetized (or benefit them in any way). Or perhaps you've repeatedly spam the same link until YT algorithm flags it as spam?
    2
  12745.  @abbotsful  "神州 Shenzhou She made a serious accusation against Zhang, that's what started this, there's no switching. This is what you need to focus on." So where's this serious accusation against Zhang by Peng Shuai? Peng Shuai had explained in an email to WTA that she's fine and resting at home, and that her allegation of sexual assault was not true. She alsso criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent. If WTA truly respected Peng Shuai, they would heed her wish for her personal privacy to be respected.
    2
  12746.  @abbotsful  "The issue is blowing up because of the actions the CPC is taking to cover up the crimes of Zhang. The silence is deafening." Do you actually have proof of the crimes of Zhang to support your accusation against him? Where's the actual claim by Peng Shuai of sexual assault?
    2
  12747.  @abbotsful  "Where's your evidence the WTA has an anti-China stance?" Steve Simons of the WTA has clearly received an email by Peng Shuai that she's fine and that the allegations of sexual assault weren't true, yet they continue to not respect Peng Shuai's wishes for personal privacy, and they are bringing politics into the matter, by threatening to suspend tournaments in China over her issue. It's like the paparazzi that's trying dig up information about someone's private life.
    2
  12748.  @abbotsful  How can a single person or organisation work with Cyrus Janssen's channel to censor comments on his channel? The way you claimed that it was the "speed and accuracy" in which your comment was deleted, that's clearly not humanly possible, it was deleted by Youtube. And again, it's YouTube policy itself to allow an channel owner to delete comments on his channel, so you are seemingly blaming YouTube policy itself since deletion of comments is within the rights of the channel owner.
    2
  12749.  @abbotsful  Could you direct me to Peng Shuai's claim that she was sexually assaulted? Since you want to talk about this then where's Peng Shuai's claim that she was sexually assaulted?
    2
  12750.  @abbotsful  "神州 Shenzhou no I blame CPC, stop repeating the same arguments" How is the CPC to blame when it is YouTube policy to allow channels to delete comments? The way you claimed that the "speed and accuracy" of the deletion makes it impossible for any human to delete your comment, it's YouTube that deleted it yet you're trying vainly to blame the CPC for YouTube policy?
    2
  12751.  @abbotsful  How has my argument failed? Firstly, you claimed "A channel or platform owner can decide what they want on the channel they own." that's part of YouTube policy for sure, then if your comment was deleted, it was because YouTube affords channel owners that option. Secondly, you claim "given the speed and accuracy of the censorship" but it is clearly humanly impossible to delete your comment with such speed and accuracy. And since you are unable to prove how other people can access Cyrus Janssen's account, then it's clearly YouTube that deleted your comment. Yet through it all, why are you seemingly trying to blame Cyrus for YouTube policy of allowing deletion of comments?
    2
  12752.  @abbotsful  I read the translated version of Peng Shuai's post on Reddit, but could you point out to me where are the allegations of sexual assault, supposedly made by Peng Shuai?
    2
  12753.  @abbotsful  1. So apparently you are resigned to the fact that "A channel or platform owner can decide what they want on the channel they own." then it's clearly part of YouTube policy and if you are still complaining, it's because of the YouTube policy. 2. So you you can't prove it? And I already your question of _ "Why would youtube delete a link to a youtube video?"_ so it's clearly possible for it to happen. And since your reasoning was "given the speed and accuracy of the censorship" then it's impossible for humans to delete your comment with such speed and accuracy and this means YouTube was behind the deletion. 3. You said: "I'm not blaming the policy, the policy is what makes it possible to do this" That statement already indicates that your blaming the YouTube policy, why are you contradicting yourself?
    2
  12754.  @yerri5567  In which instance did PLAAF aircraft flew closer to Taiwan than the mainland?
    2
  12755.  @Kingofthehill84  And oil tankers can sprung a leak out there in the ocean, leading to environmental damage and also loss of money.
    2
  12756. It's a cycle of inbreeding by the same few sources that's sustaining the Uighur genocide narrative by the West. Just a poke and the whole narrative falls apart like a house of cards.
    2
  12757.  @2012Prada  Even the toilet paper that is in high demand nowadays is Chinese invention. With Chinese invention of paper, came inventions like paper lanterns, paper umbrellas and paper banknote (which made business transactions easier since merchants need not carry around lots of metal coinage and precious stones) Mankind's first aviation was in the form of paper kite, and even hot air balloons were invented in China, and were known as Sky Lanterns (天灯) or Kongming Lanterns (孔明灯) Here is beautiful video of RISE Lantern Festival in Las Vegas, celebrated with Chinese Sky Lanterns. Video: youtu.be/SNtwlBbBdb4?t=10 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    2
  12758.  @byunghwara  What new invention do you want me to talk about? China invented the world's first passenger drone. Video: World’s First Passenger Drone Unveiled In China | NBC News youtu.be/B7Hm-rmLQcU
    2
  12759.  @MarkYeung1  If I am Zelenskyy, I would listen to President Xi (instead of listening to President Biden) and start suing for peace. There was an opportunity for peace talks between Ukraine and Russia in Nov 2022 by Turkiye, but Zelenskyy was ill-advised by Boris Johnson (of all people) to continue resisting.
    2
  12760.  @MarkYeung1  "Mr. Shenzhou said he had excellent approval ratings among Russians. He will do well after the troops withdrawal." That was according to surveys in Russia. Also since the survey indicates that majority of Russians support Putin's actions in Ukraine, why would they support a withdrawal of troops?
    2
  12761.  @rolyrodriguez1000  "That is hipccritical when China also wants to go into Taiwan." Since when did mainland China ever said that it wants to go into Taiwan?
    2
  12762.  @MarkYeung1  So if you've got no problems with Britain police arresting those protestors, then why do you go on incessantly when Hong Kong police do the same?
    2
  12763.  @egns1700  "神州 Shenzhou my friend ignore those bigots they never read or understand anything of the world they always hear it from from" Yes. Those people only listen to one-side of the story and ignore the other side, and they resort to hurling insults against others that take a different point of view from them.
    2
  12764.  @egns1700  "神州 Shenzhou i always listen to different views because thats the way to solve things like misunderstandings etc" Exactly. The way to clear up misunderstanding is to talk things out before it becomes too late. If two of your friends are having an argument, would you only listen to one side of the story, while ignoring the other side? Or hear out both sides equally? This is precisely the kind of behavior that some people on this thread adopt.
    2
  12765. Jefe Hoptosh Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when Mongolians conquered both Tibet and Song Dynasty China and made it part of Yuan dynasty China. Just like when the Manchu people conquered Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia and incorporated those territory (including Manchuria) into Qing dynasty China. You mean you want to apply Geneva convention to Genghis Khan and to the Manchu people for what they did to make those territories part of China?
    2
  12766. Just like U.S politicians will fight Russia to every last drop of Ukrainian blood.
    2
  12767. +ジョーさん said "Imagine you were a Chinese man but everyone else insisted you were Japanese" So its the same with Taiwan being inseparable part of China. You are Chinese and calling yourself a new term like "Taiwanese" isn't going to change who you really are. The truth is that you are Chinese and has always been so, like you said. ジョーさん said "China used economic leverage to force other countries to accept its One-China Principle," Excuse me, but the One China Policy was first passed by KMT (now Taiwan) under the ROC constitution in 1947 in Nanjing. Even after the communists overthrew the KMT and Mao founded People's Republic of China in 1949, ROC's nationalist government continued to claim legitimacy as the government of all of China. Later, the KMT a modified the "One China" principle to what is known as the "1992 Consensus". Under this "consensus", both governments "agree" that there is only one single sovereign state encompassing both mainland China and Taiwan, but disagree about which of the two governments is the legitimate government of this state. Are you sure that you really live in Taiwan, if you don't even know the history of the One China Policy?
    2
  12768. +ジョーさん The thing is, all of Taiwan's prosperity occurred under the authoritarian KMT rule (similar to China's progress occurring under authoritarian CCP rule) Only in 2016 (2 years ago) did another party (DPP) finally took over KMT at the reins, and since then Taiwan's economy has been in a slump. Its because the newcomer party (DPP) doesn't have the same governing experience as KMT, and if I'm not wrong, there was even violence breaking up in the Taiwan Parliament with members throwing chairs and furniture at each other. Massive fight breaks out in Taiwanese parliament youtube.com/watch?v=kXmPDLRt6hA Whereas the CCP doesn't act like that. There may be infighting among the various CCP political factions, but when an agreement is made, they go along with implementing the policy efficiently. But back to Taiwan, how can the people of Taiwan trust such people to be your government? Because the West thinks that every country should adopt democracy? Look at President Trump making use of his charisma to seduce votes from gullible Americans with false promises of making America great again. Is such as system really good for the USA, as for Taiwan? In my opinion, Politics should be about doing what's right, not necessarily what's popular. Sometimes the popular thing may not be right, and the right thing may not be popular. Democracy, reduced to its basic elements, is all about doing what's popular, not necessarily what's right. Why do you let the ordinary people who aren't politically savvy, vote for such important decisions regarding your countries future? Why not let the people who know how to govern govern?
    2
  12769. The USA is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, etc, even in the 21st century. The USA is bombing those countries and cutting off their heads (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now, Assad of Syria and Maduro of Venezuela are at risk of US attempts to enact regime change. Whereas China today is not at war with any country (since our last major war in 1979) and instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, and also African countries like Kenya, Nigeria, Chad, Sudan, etc, building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc.
    2
  12770.  @MarkYeung1  According to SCMP (i.e Hong Kong-based newspaper) there's the title Taiwan proves to be unwelcoming for many Hong Kong activist. The island shows it true face with proposed “nine don’ts” list, released in error by immigration agency prohibiting campaigning, employment and media interviews for people from Hong Kong .
    2
  12771.  @MarkYeung1  I've been to Luohu Commercial City in Shenzhen, it's a place often frequented by Hong Kongers, with multiple levels of stores and customers often like to bargain for a cheaper price. A common tactic is to ask how much an item is, then say "Too expensive" and walk out without buying. Maybe that shopkeeper saw you attempting to use the same tactic which is why the shopkeeper said not to waste time.
    2
  12772. +Rohan Waghmare Since when do those countries become automatically part of Chinese territories? If you are talking about Hambantota port in Sri Lanka, then it was only leased to China for 99 years. Once 99 years is over, the debt would have been fully repaid, and the port will be returned to Sri Lanka's control.
    2
  12773.  @slovackoinfo  "神州 Shenzhou The Communist government has been in China since 1949." And it was the communist government that imposed the condition that foreign companies setting up shop in China have to transfer technology or alternatively partner up with local Chinese company, and this was what brought success to China. Left on their own, Western companies couldn't care less about developing China. You asked: "Why not from the USSR?" There were joint Sino-Soviet companies that were established, but they weren't as common. Also, you've never actually elaborated how exactly it was that the West developed China at all.
    2
  12774. 中国制造 Made in China But people like laowhy just blindly claim China has very very high cancer rates (at 7:55 of the video) without consulting factual evidence. According to my previous source, China has only sees 181 cases per 100,000 whereas USA has 300.2, Canada 252.1, Australia 314.1, France 300.4, German 223.2, Britain 317, Japan 201.1 and South Korea 262.4. Even Mexico has only 128.4 cases per 100,000.
    2
  12775. CapnTates I clearly listed the cancer rates worldwide in my global cancer map source, and although China has higher rates of certain types of cancers such as stomach cancer, the overall cancer rate is still significantly lower than many Western countries like USA, Canada, Australia, Europe, etc.
    2
  12776. CapnTates According to Global Cancer Map, for lung cancer out of every 100,000 people, China sees average 33.5 cases compared to USA's 42.1 so how is this way more lung cancer? And also the overall cases of cancer in China is still significantly lower than Western countries.
    2
  12777. Carolyn Jackson That's because those countries (grouped together) are among the world's most populous nations. China, India, Indonesia, Brazil, Pakistan, Nigeria, etc, have high populations so naturally there are more cancer cases. In my source, the cancer rate is calculated out of every 100,000 people in the country, so despite China's large population, less there is significantly less cases than in, say every 100,000 people in USA for example.
    2
  12778. +Peter Gray Chinese people manufacture products like smartphones, personal computers, appliances, electronics, sneakers and clothing cheaply so that the cost of living in other countries kept low. Think of the billions of dollars, people have saved over the years on living expenses thanks to affordable Chinese goods. You complain China produce crap, but then demand for Chinese goods remain high enough that people continue buying our goods, because they have helped people save money over the course of years.
    2
  12779.  @SPLITSLEEVE  You said mainland China has not treated Taiwan as a province, then why is it Taiwan cannot modify their constitution and declare independence? Why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations as an independent country? Is there something preventing Taiwan from joining the UN like an independent country?
    2
  12780.  @aksbeixhev  "They are Chinese, grown up in a society based on democracy and freedom of speech." Actually, Taiwan spent most of its life under authoritarian single-party rule of the KMT. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    2
  12781.  L Lk  Exactly. China also publishes more books than any other country in the world. According to UNESCO, this is an important index of standard of living, education, and of a country's self-awareness. Books published per country per year 1. China (440,000 books) 2. United States (304,912 books) 3. United Kingdom (184,000 books) 4. Japan (139,078 books) 5. Russia (101,981 books) ... Source: Books published per country per year wikipedia.org/wiki/Books_published_per_country_per_year
    2
  12782. In Ukraine, the real people supporting genocide are the ultra-nationalists like Azov battalion. In Xinjiang, the real people supporting genocide are the Uighur separatists like Arslan.
    2
  12783. Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous relationship with a much older man has been revealed, so Peng Shuai has been avoiding the public eye and she has expressed a desire for personal privacy in a video call with IOC. But the WTA is trying to pry into her personal affairs and demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see.
    2
  12784.  @adabellana77  "She disappeared and now denies everything, clearly she was threatened by the regime of her country" I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and she has had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationsship with a much older man, spanning several years in fact, but where are the allegations of sexual assault in her post? In fact, Peng Shuai had previously known Zhang Gaoli since 7 years ago, and she actually consented to sex in her post.
    2
  12785.  @adabellana77  I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and it turns out that the sex was consensual. Peng Shuai wrote: "Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well." So according to her, she consented to sex, then where are the allegations of sexual assault in Peng Shuai's post?
    2
  12786.  @maynardyorke  "神州 Shenzhou a better life would happen instead of the CCP," Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past (similar to India, world's largest democracy) but fast forward till today and look at how far China has come under the leadership of the Communist Party of China? China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the CPC, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. China has found a political system that best suits China, has proven to be viable and extremely successful to boot, then why do you wish for the failure of the CPC? That would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, possibly sending China back to square one, so why'd you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China?
    2
  12787.  @yslee1401  Of course! Why didn't I see this? Meng Wanzhou was arrested in Canada to escape the clutches of the CPC! It all makes absolutely sense now! Why didn't I think up such a conspiracy theory myself?
    2
  12788. Even the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  12789.  @gwx11  What 50 cents? When did I ever said anything about the Chinese Communist Party here in this thread at all?
    2
  12790. I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    2
  12791. What about US pop culture catchphrases like "F**K THE POLICE" which is extremely popular? All it does is promote lack of respect for authority and make policemen job much more difficult.
    2
  12792. There is actually Chinese term for SJWs called báizuǒ 白左 (lit. "White Left") to refer to those "libtards" that argue for causes without any actual conviction behind their arguments. They are arguing just to "feel good" about themselves that's all. Who knows, they themselves may secretly dislike Hip Hop culture (as do many others) but they will still persistently defend it, in order to be "politically correct".
    2
  12793. Many foreigners in China have remarked that there is oftentimes no PC in China. Here are some examples: "No POLITICAL CORRECTNESS in CHINA!" (by serpentza) youtube.com/watch?v=yNNFccVgdiU "Chinese People Aren't Politically Correct" (by PrimeInChina) youtube.com/watch?v=XeA1vnE3LdE "Politically Correct in China? Good luck with that." (by Gweilo 60) youtube.com/watch?v=FzIbYG7OfIU
    2
  12794. Tim Horn Your behavior matches that of SJWs. You lack any conviction in your argument and in fact you even admitted to not being a fan of Hip Hop yourself, yet you still advocate defending hip hop? Just to appear "politically correct" ? Just to make yourself "feel good" ? This is prime SJW attitude right here folks... Why can't everyone just be truthful about things here? If someone is obviously fat and unattractive by societal standards, but still thinks she's pretty, why do you people continue to kid yourself and say she's pretty? Just to appear politically correct? Look at what SJWs have done to your societies here. You continue defending something for the sake of looking good that's all, even if you secretly dislike it yourself.
    2
  12795. +Tim Horn SJWs are people who fight for causes that they themselves lack deep seated conviction and engaging in disingenuous arguments. They argue for the sake of appearing "politically correct" that's all, in order to raise their personal reputation. Since you already admitted that you are not into Hip Hop culture (which many other people in this section have expressed similar dislike as well) then why are you even fighting to defend it at all? Why can't Chinese government ban things that are obviously detrimental to our society? Hip Hop songs contain many lyrics about sex, violence, drugs and a life of crime, so why can't we stop it from being broadcasted on television? Adults know well enough to steer clear of crime, but young kids don't, and they often want to imitate this to appear "cool". So why can't China ban it in our country for those reasons? People like you fighting to defend a cause that you yourselves lack conviction, now that is part of the definition of SJWs. Your behavior is similar to those LGBT activists who aren't themselves LGBT (may even secretly dislike it themselves) but want everyone to enjoy themselves and be left alone. For what? Because its the politically correct thing to do? Why don't you people just be honest with yourselves here, instead of faking it and defending them for sake of political correctness? Hip Hop songs lyrics themselves already promote degeneracy, and combined with several other factors to subconsciously influence generations over time. Catchphrases like "F**k the Police" and "Thug Life" only promote lack of respect for authority, and encourage people commit crimes and abuse drugs. Its your Western countries choice (and funeral) if you want to continue degrading societal values, but don't expect China to follow suit.
    2
  12796.  @jackchiu7560  Yeah. Many Americans (but not all) seem to think that simply having the power to vote out their leaders is democracy in itself. But if the new leader isn't giving Americans what they want, instead it's doing the bidding of the 1%, then USA is a plutocracy, not a democracy.
    2
  12797. The United States has Adrian Zenz. China has Daniel Dumbrill. Let the propaganda and debunking wars begin!
    2
  12798.  @tomster7574  How is calling a man who puts on a female wig and dresses as female a man considered lunacy? The lunatics are the ones who insist on following the proper gender pronouns. Just like how is dressing laowhy up in Chinese clothing and speaking few phrases of Mandarin, enough to consider him Chinese?
    2
  12799.  @tomster7574  You can't refute my points so you just claim I am rambling that's all? What have you contributed to the discussion thus far?
    2
  12800.  @johnblasiak607  China has world's 2nd largest economy, but if you look at China's GDP per capital, then we are considered developing country isn't? And why can't Chinese buy up property in other countries? If you put your land up for sale, then can't Chinese investors buy your real estate?
    2
  12801.  @johnblasiak607  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    2
  12802. China today is hardly communist. In fact, China is said to be more capitalist than some Western countries.
    2
  12803. Even American diplomats like Jake Sullivan and Anthony Blinken display such arrogance towards China, their MSM journalists are basically the same.
    2
  12804. Hopefully the people of Taiwan are smarter than that. The elections next year in Taiwan will help determine if the people of Taiwan want cross-strait relations to improve (under KMT) or deteriorate further under the current government in Taiwan.
    2
  12805. +suraj sharma Brahmos is joint project between India and Russia, and India requires Russia express permission in order to sell Brahmos to Vietnam.
    2
  12806. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    2
  12807. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  12808. As stated in Republic of China's own constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  12809.  @echelon2k8  "神州 Shenzhou Again, China saying that they are being neutral whilst trading with both sides as though this war isn't happening when they know it is happening whilst other nations are condemning and sanctioning Russia for what is happening is de facto supporting Russia during this time." But that's exactly what neutral countries do, they continue trading with both Russia and Ukraine as though there is nothing happening. Other nations condemn Russia, that's their own business, but China is neutral unlike those other countries, so how does your logic even make sense that China is not neutral? You said: "Not only helping them, but helping themselves. They also plan to benefit out of this in more ways than one with their desire to act as a mediator." Because that's what neutral countries like China do, we strive towards win-win cooperation not slapping sanctions against Russia just because others say so. I really don't see you logic on how you can claim China is not neutral when China is clearly not picking a side between Russia and Ukraine. You said: "It doesn't matter if they're a quarter, an eighth or a sixteenth, they're still Chinese, unless they're not Chinese." So even if they are 1/32 or 1/64 or 1/128 Chinese, it means they are still Chinese? Unless they are not Chinese? What sort of troll logic is this? Obviously there are more than two options, but you're just trying to limit the number of options to just yes or no. You said: "It doesn't require a ''life story" worth of an answer to the question, a simple yes or no would suffice for what is being asked." It does require tracing your lineage and as well as various other factors just to answer this question. Just like Russian-Ukraine history goes back many years and Russians and Ukrainians were originally one people. You said: "Yes, if they have no other real choice in order to ethically act otherwise, which apparently they don't, I completely agree with you." So you've just agreed that EU countries continue to buy Russian gas, then why are you harping over China choosing to not slap sanctions over Russia? You said: "Private companies, such as McDonald's, etc, who 'choose' whether or not they want to pull out of Russia at this time is separate from the government mandated sanctions of these countries." It's because the EU governments slap sanctions on Russia that's why McDonald's and other companies choose to pull out of Russia and that the ordinary Russian civilians are suffering as a result of sanctions (that don't work btw). And again, those ethnic Russians living in the West are being discriminated against because of their race, such as Russian athletes, sportsmen, chess players, musicians, composers, conductors, dancers, artists, and so on. So aren't the West literally targeting anyone of Russian descent here in these witch-hunts? You said: "Making an accusation that China is not neutral is different from making an accusation that China is deliberately giving Russia the ability to get around their sanctions, even if this is what they are actually doing." It's the same because you have no evidence to substantiate your argument. Furthermore, you've just agreed that EU countries continue to purchase Russian gas, because they depend on it to survive through the winter. You said: "I said let me know when the US starts starts supporting dictators that unlawfully invade other sovereign democratic countries." I already gave it previously, you've just choose to ignored it because you can't refute it. You said: "Again, not one elected by the people." Take the last Hong Kong Chief Executive election in 2017. Carrie Lam won the three-way election garnering 777 votes out of the 1,200 Election Committee (which consist entirely of Hong Kong groups) so how have the Hong Kong people not elected their leader when the elections results indicate so? You said: "They're a puppet government of Beijing which won't allow anyone to govern Hong Kong who isn't being controlled by them from above." Hong Kong government is a separate government from Beijing, and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong elections, they only appoint the HK Chief Executive as per Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45, (香港基本法第四十五條) which states that: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." You said: "The people of Hong Kong after all their protests did not choose to be targeted as terrorists just for protesting what they thought was injustice against them." Some Hong Kong rioters were literally throwing petrol bombs at Hong Kong police officers, they even doused an elderly man in flammable liquid and ignited him, as well as threw bricks that killed an elderly Hong Kong cleaner. You said: "China is now in a state of ongoing non-compliance with the Joint Declaration." The Sino-British Joint Declaration IS Hong Kong Basic Law, and Article 23 states that Hong Kong shall enact laws to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against Beijing, so this Hong Kong National Security Law is in accordance with Hong Kong Basic Law and therefore, the Sino-British Joint Declaration as well. You said: "Which is why the Hong Kong government is a puppet government and why they have basically ignored Hong Kong's legally binding handover treaty with Britain." Hong Kong Basic Law was written by the British, and it's under Article 45 that Beijing clearly reserves the right to appoint the Hong Kong Chief Executive, so how is mainland China ignoring the Joint Declaration? You said: "Through a military offensive in which large numbers of combatants of one political entity aggressively enter territory governed by another." But it is still entirely within the same country of China, so how can a country invade itself?
    2
  12810.  @echelon2k8  China being neutral means that China maintain good relations with both Ukraine and Russia, instead of caving into pressure and taking sides in a conflict just because other countries choose to sanction one or the other. Neutral countries also don't choose to condemn a country just because others exert pressure to do so. Chinese media like CGTN facilitate discussion from Ukrainian side, Russian side, even Chinese observers and so on, so how is China not neutral in this regard? In fact, the Russian's side of the conflict is absent in NATO media as RT news and Sputnik Radio are blocked in EU and they need VPN to access it. "whilst most other nations have denounced and/or sanctioned them for the invasion that they started is not being neutral." Neutral countries do not condemn or sanction other countries just because others do so, that would be akin to taking a side in the conflict, and that's not the Chinese stance, China's stance is neutrality after all. "What, you seriously want to say that they're being neutral because they've been doing that prior to..." Neutral because China has been trading with Russia prior to and during the conflict, so that's how neutrality is maintained isn't it? "Seems I now have to ask you this question as well: Did Russia invade the Ukraine or not, yes or no?" Again, that's another false dichotomy where you deliberately limit the answer to two options so I won't be sucked into answering this question.
    2
  12811.  @echelon2k8  Tell me why should a neutral country like China, be forced to condemn Russia? Just because other countries choose to do so, doesn't mean that China has to follow them. China is clearly neutral country, that's why China continue to trade with both Ukraine and Russia. Even you admitted that EU countries still purchase Russian gas in order to tide themselves over the winter, yet you still harp on China for what reason?
    2
  12812.  @echelon2k8  "神州 Shenzhou Thought so" I guess that means you finally accept the fact that China is a neutral country after all, and that China shouldn't have to condemn a country just because other countries do. I'm glad we have come to such an agreement.
    2
  12813.  @talkinghead8014  There are some Australians who complain about Chinese buying up their land and property. But why put them up for sale in the first place?
    2
  12814. You're calling me a wumao? Did I ever mentioned the Chinese government in my post?
    2
  12815.  @mohd.adnankhan7670  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, it was only detected by Chinese government. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    2
  12816. North Korea tests a hypersonic missile. USA, Japan, South Korea freak out and slap sanctions on North Korea. Also, USA tests a hypersonic missile 4 times. Nobody bats an eyelid.
    2
  12817. +Thomas Eddison I am glad that you think so. Indeed, both USA and China are the top two economies, and if war were to break out between our countries, then the rest of the world's economies would be hit and would most likely be sent into recession. Our countries should avoid that scenario at all costs. Regarding planet exploration, it is indeed a better pursuit than war, but it's too bad that USA and China can't cooperate together in this field because NASA is forbidden from working with CNSA (Chinese NASA) according to US law. Space exploration should be for all mankind, and no one should be ostracised from this endeavour. Even the former Soviet Union Russia is allowed to work with NASA, but not China. It's like China isn't even regarded as part of this planet at all, and it breaks my heart as Chinese.
    2
  12818.  @perrychrispy1  Do have evidence that they are tortured? That Uighur boy seemed happy to speak Mandarin and name the People's Republic of China as his homeland.
    2
  12819. 完全感受到这套电影的美妙，当年在电影院看的时候，我已把「功夫」列为他的最佳影片，因为他拍出了我童年的幻想。
    2
  12820. 其实我们的祖国有素质高的人 只不过素质低的人有点多 而且奇葩被爆出来了…
    2
  12821.  @stunningandbrave2520  You said: "I am overjoyed that Xi has no term limits." China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 15-year plans, 20-year plans, etc to map out China's direction and future in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long-term planning. Whereas the U.S Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only make short-term plans instead of long-term plans (say 10 years) for America's future. This is the disadvantage of US's short-term planning.
    2
  12822.  @stunningandbrave2520  "Like I said, democracy exists, therefore if it has a tendency to fail, it also has a tendency to succeed." Well, authoritarianism also exists, and in fact, it's has been proven to be successful for 1000-2000 years of human history, existing far longer than the 100-200 years of modern liberal democracy.
    2
  12823.  @x7j4  You asked "If you were attacked repeatedly on your frontyard by your neighbor, would you call the police?" So call the police then. Take the matter to court; to the ICJ or the ICC. Why haven't they done that? Instead of calling the police, they choose to retaliate physically.
    2
  12824. Like that monster from Dungeons and Dragons, Beholder.
    2
  12825.  @aeoliaschenberg5880  Coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, Chinese scientists say analysis of genomic data from 93 samples of the novel coronavirus suggests it was imported from elsewhere. Source: Coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3051981/coronavirus-did-not-originate-wuhan-seafood-market-chinese
    2
  12826.  @ikapuchino  "神州 Shenzhou what about SARS-CoV-Guangdong?" What is that?
    2
  12827.  @aeoliaschenberg5880  A geneticist from Cambridge University, Dr Peter Forster and his team have identified 3 Covid-19 strains (A, B, C) Type-A is believed to be strain that leaped from bats to humans (animal-to-human) and Type-B is mutated from Type-A and found predominantly in China, while Type-C is mutated from Type-B and found outside China in places like Singapore. Video: No proof that Covid-19 originated in Wuhan: Peter Forster youtu.be/AQQf2yoymu0 The interesting thing is that the Type-A (animal-to-human) is found predominantly outside East Asia, in USA and Europe.
    2
  12828. 说真的，我并不同意中国在历史上是一个不追求霸权的国家。其实直到清末，中国都是一个追求霸权的国家。但是，随着时间的推移中国所追求的霸权发生了变化。和日不落帝国的全球领土霸权，美国的全球军事经济的霸权是不一样的。中国追求的渐渐变成了文化上的霸权，换句话说中国追求的是“以德服人”，用文化同化周围的邻邦，以展现自己文化的优越性。 现在，我相信中国不会是一个追求霸权的国家，特别是领土扩张武力威胁。主要是因为近代的100年对中国的影响特别特别的巨大。中日战争，彻底让中国从受害国的视角上明白了战争的残酷。中国是世界上最会从历史中找经验，学习并且“以史为镜”的。
    2
  12829. +Ashutosh Kumar You can't refute my points so you just label others as kids instead? Like what has the poor rural Chinese got to do here, when it will be PLA troops doing the fighting? The Chinese government has monetary reserves in our banks, and it will most likely be used to finance a war, not the poor rural Chinese.
    2
  12830. +Alan's Saladbar China's 5000 years of history and culture is too expansive to be wiped by any man, any party, or government. Even the 1st emperor of China, Qin Shihuangdi, was against Confucianism, and burned books of Confucius teachings and buried Confucian scholars alive (The latter is allegedly). Even the Mongolians and Manchu people conquered China, and tried to wipe out Chinese culture, but ended up assimilating into Chinese culture. So why you think everything has been undone during the Cultural Revolution?
    2
  12831. Ukraine is not a democracy. Freedom House, a nonpartisan think tank that ranks democracies, has labeled Ukraine “a transitional or hybrid regime”. Even the The Economist Intelligence Unit in its 2021 Democracy Index also pegged Ukraine as a “hybrid regime.”
    2
  12832. Hong Kong Education system teaches ancient Chinese history, but stopped short of teaching the Opium Wars or the Century of Humiliation faced by China, so many Hong Kong youth grow up unaware of recent Chinese history.
    2
  12833. The United States has double standards. When Saudi Arabian crown prince tortured and killed a journalist (Khashoggi), President Trump stands in support of the Saudi Arabian prince and called the journalist "an enemy of the state". Even after Trump, the new Biden Administration doesn't seem interested in taking the issue with Saudi Arabia.
    2
  12834.  @MaxMax-to5ss  He's been saying positive things about the West, but you people just overlook it, and claim he isn't saying anything positive about the West. As for the two Canadians in China, how do you expect him to get in touch with the Chinese police, given that he's currently living in Canada, not China? Because he's living in Canada, it affords him the opportunity to speak to lawyers about Meng Wanzhou's unlawful arrest, that's what his recent videos have been about. But how do you expect Cyrus Janssen to talk about the two Canadians when he's not living in China?
    2
  12835. President Xi actually offered to extend the One Country, Two Systems policy to include Taiwan, allowing Taiwan to keep their separate government, currency, passport, (even keep their army!) but be considered reunified with China. It would be akin to the hypothetical example of North Korea and South Korea agreeing to reunify as a single country, Korea, while allowing both sides to keep their respective governments. But former Taiwan President Ma rejected President Xi's offer and did not offer a counter proposal of his own for reunification.
    2
  12836. Nobody actually knows what's really going to happen once lockdown is finally lifted. Even Trump is assembling a task force to advise how to go about reopening the economy. Nobody has reopened yet so China is actually paving the way and showing other countries how to go about reopening the economy.
    2
  12837. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    2
  12838. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑
    2
  12839. My arguments are built upon facts and logic, with links to support everything I said, whereas people like wisdomleader2017 just claim that Chinese media says this, without even providing a link, so who are you going to believe here? I have shown USA is the world's most protectionist country as compared to China, that China has the world's largest automotive industry. I have shown that China leads Japan in the electric car industry, that BYD Auto is a global recognized brand in 2015. I did brought up the China's highspeed railway, but it is to show an example of how China's hi-speed rail surpassed Japanese Shinkansen so why can't China eventually surpass Japan in automotive industry? Like I mentioned earlier, Japan initially copied Western car designs in 1930s, but Japan has surpassed some American automotive brands. So why people like wisdomleader2017 continue to believe China's automotive industry will never surpass Japan? Why don't you people focus on attacking my points, instead of attacking me personally like what planetzito is doing? If you suspect me of being 50 cent party member, then can you provide evidence for your claims?
    2
  12840. EricRamos My arguments are built upon facts and logic... but apparently yours are based on hurling insults and attacking me personally instead of my points.
    2
  12841. Perhaps ostensibly it suggests that many Chinese understand the United States, better than Americans who understand China.
    2
  12842. Japanese government actually have to fork out money and pay their own companies to shift out of China and return to Japan, so not all Japanese companies will comply. And moving back to Japan means wages are higher and the Japanese market not as big as China's enormous market.
    2
  12843. Johnny Rodriguez So isn't that the same as saying Americans have zero chance of dialogue with NK, if not for China's efforts at getting NK to come to the table? All of Trump's name calling and sanction slapping did nothing to bring NK to the table at all, only Chinese efforts made Kim visit Beijing. If Trump were really so capable, then why didn't Kim just visit Washington straightaway, rather than come to Beijing? As for China's reduced tariffs, you are reading it wrongly, China reducing tariffs on foreign automobiles means USA will face more competition from other carmakers if they want to enter Chinese automotive industry (which is the world's largest automotive industry). And China reducing automotive tariffs, doesn't mean that our tariffs on US soybeans have been reduced.
    2
  12844. Johnny Rodriguez So doesn't that mean USA would not have any talks with NK, if not for China? It all boils down back to my very first point, that American NEEDS China if they ever want proper dialogue with North Korea. History has shown this, even during the Six Party Disarmament Talks.
    2
  12845. Johnny Rodriguez Then why does Trump constantly announce during his public speeches that China's cooperation is essential for denuclearization along the Korean peninsula? Isn't it clear that America needs China if it ever wants to talk to NK at all? As for president Xi's tariff reduction, it applies to automotive industry that's all. China's retaliatory tariffs against US soybeans and other products are still in place isn't it?
    2
  12846. Why are you accusing me of being Chinese government agent? All I did was ask some questions which you yourself failed to answer, and it only leads back to my initial point that Americans NEED China if they ever want dialogue with North Korea. You can't refute my initial point at all, so you resort to insulting me? If not for Beijing, Washington won't even have a snowball's chance in hell to enter dialogue with Pyongyang. If you think USA doesn't want talks, then why not exercise your military option then? Who's stopping you from exercising your last option?
    2
  12847. Many Filipinos tend to have the "Colonial Mentality," which is the internalized perception of inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization. Such people tend to worship Anglo-Saxon culture are inherently superior over other cultures (including their own). Even after being "freed" from colonization, the minds of many Filipinos remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters.
    2
  12848.  @caleblee1780  What makes you think Chinese people lack freedom of information? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study and play. Everybody has heard of Chinese tourists visiting their lands as well as Chinese international students enrolling in their universities and studying the same topics as their local peers. In fact, China is the largest source of international tourists and international students, yet you're claiming the government is keeping people ignorant of different ideas?
    2
  12849.  @jackssrv  China's fish farms dominate the world's aquaculture, and we are home to world's largest deep-sea fish farming facility, Shenlan 1. Video: China’s first deep-sea fish farm opens for salmon breeding youtube.com/watch?v=NrdC7ZvfGj0 and we have even help Norway (another great fishing nation) to build world's first offshore fish farm. Video: Built by China! World's first offshore fish farm in Norway youtube.com/watch?v=MAC5l8HD-mE
    2
  12850.  @jackssrv  China can support 20% of world's population with only 7% arable land. Rice farmers ingeniously cut steppes into hills for their rice padi, and even deserts can be converted into arable land. Video: This Ingenious System Brings Water to the Chinese Desert youtube.com/watch?v=8rQAXaaU1v8 Video: New technology in China turns desert into land rich with crops youtube.com/watch?v=cazVrq9v1mE
    2
  12851. Mohit Khanna If Bhutanese government wants to claim that territory, then where is its proof of ownership? Bhutan doesn't even maintain diplomatic relations with any UNSC members, meaning it does not have foreign relations with USA, UK, France and Russia as well, not just China alone. Even North Korea has more foreign relations than Bhutan in this aspect. Just look at maps of foreign relations for N. Korea and for Bhutan to see my meaning. What then, makes Bhutan's territorial claims more valid, then China's then? Our government already produced maps including the treaty of 1890, but Bhutanese government, as far as I know, has not produced any substantial evidence. Normally, sending military troops into other country's territory is grounds for an act of war. The Chinese government actually being rather lenient by making multiple repeated requests for Indian government troops to withdraw from our territory. The Modi regime is already forced to give up its "swagger" and to look for a face-saving way to withdraw. The usual blusters of India’s present Army Chief have disappeared in the last few weeks. Even some Indian analysts are admitting that Narendra Modi’s foreign policy is disastrous.
    2
  12852. Aniruddh Joshi China doesn't claim all of Arunachal Predesh, only Tawang. The government has offered to cede Aksai Chin to Indian government, in exchange for Tawang region of Arunachal Predesh. Indian government however, has rejected the offer and is yet to offer counterproposal of its own. http://economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/china-ready-to-cede-land-for-part-of-arunachal-pradesh/articleshow/57440754.cms The government is already being lenient by tolerating Indian troops presence in Chinese territory for more than 2 months already. All this is doing is delaying construction efforts because of Indian government's attempts to hinder Chinese progress.
    2
  12853. +Adityaa Chaubey Who is being unreasonable here? You are the one keep insulting me and calling derogatory terms, just because my beliefs are different from yours. Chinese government have produced solid evidence and you discredit it immediately, but Bhutanese government produce no evidence, and you expect me to believe it? You are the one being biased and mocking me ceaselessly, when you have produced no evidence of your own. Chinese government even notified Indian government in advance prior to our activities in Donglong, sending two notifications, but Indian government did not respond. Indian government only responded by sending Indian troops into Chinese territory in order to obstruct construction. Source: ( thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/india-notified-of-road-work-china/article19447848.ece )
    2
  12854. Mohit Khanna The government is actively taking steps avoid war, yet you people are actually eager for war to break out in Donglong, over territory that India doesn't even claim for itself? China has naval bases in Djibouti for our submarines. Our navy has has 68 submarines with mixture nuclear and conventional power ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Liberation_Army_Navy_Submarine_Force ) whereas Indian navy only has 15 submarines ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Navy ) Furthermore, China big trading partners with USA and Europe, so these countries may not take kindly to Indian blockade Chinese goods. War will not help either of our countries in any way, except to hinder Asia's progress. Soon the BRICS summit will be held, and our countries should take the time resolve this issue peacefully. We should be cooperating to resist Western influences, not fighting amongst ourselves.
    2
  12855. Aniruddh Joshi PLA troops may have inadvertently crossed LOC a number of times, just like Indian army. But ultimately, we withdraw our troops in the end to prevent outbreak of conflict. In Ladkah, it is unknown which side started the stone pelting, but there are reports of stones thrown from both sides. Ladakh incident is in response to Indian troops entering our territory for months, isn't it? As far as I know, Indian government made no such requests for project withdrawal from Kashmir. But Chinese government has made multiple repeated requests for Indian government withdrawal of troops from our territory, before proceeding to negotiations.
    2
  12856. +Adityaa Chaubey Even if you dismiss it from being Chinese website, the end of article also says "The U.S. has not taken a side so far. State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauertsaid on July 18 that the U.S. is concerned about the ongoing situation there, saying both sides should work together to try to come up with some better sort of arrangement for peace." This means USA is at most, neutral to the conflict. As for Hiramatsu's statement, it could be ambiguous, because it is talking about unilaterally change status quo by force and could also perhaps refer to Indian troops entering Chinese territory by force. Where exactly does Japan say it does not recognise Doklam as Chinese territory? If you agree with that guy only on one specific section, then did you quote his entire comment? including the "Chinese are inferior race, and China is a disease which needs to be treated." It's obvious that you insult and mock Chinese people constantly, just because our views differ from yours. Pakistan is nuclear-capable state, unlike Afghanistan, Israel, etc. so it's unlikely that they will attack a nuclear state when Kashmir mainly concerns India and Pakistan. They will most likely remain neutral. Russia is neutral to both of us, but India also hold military drills with USA and Japan. If India grows too close to USA, then Russia will grow further from India. USA fighter jets and missiles are going to cost a bomb for India and possibly hurt its economy. China manufactures our own weapons locally, so it is cheaper for long term war, unlike India which has to purchase its weapons subjected to market prices. India cannot officially export Brahmos to Vietnam without Russia approval, since it is joint project between both countries. On 5 August 2017, Indian External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Raveesh Kumar said Vietnam’s Foreign Ministry has already rejected the reports of India sales of Brahmos to Vietnam.
    2
  12857. +Adityaa Chaubey Your first link is not working for me. It says " The web service to this account has been limited temporarily! " According to your Forbes Article on India's GDP, "We must, of course, take such macroeconomic predictions with the necessary pinch of salt" so no one knows how its going to play out. Furthermore, it assumes that there is peace and stability in India and no war with China, in order to make that prediction. Trump is only expected to sell the drones to India, and according to the article, India made its participation “contingent on receiving billions and billions and billions of dollars in foreign aid.” India has been identified as being the top recipient of US economic aid according (timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/India-top-recipient-of-US-economic-aid/articleshow/48093123.cms ) Regarding Brahmos, you are only using words like "likely" meaning that the sales is unconfirmed and both spokepersons have addressed the issue in this article (idrw.org/brahmos-not-sold-to-vietnam-india/ ) According to above article "Raveesh Kumar official spokesperson of the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) in India has clarified that India has not supplied supersonic Brahmos Cruise missiles to Vietnam and spokesperson for Vietnam’s External Affairs also has clarified he had not confirmed the sale and just talked about defence and strategic relations with India and was misquoted by Vietnamese media." Israel only widely believed to possess nuclear weapons according to the Wikipedia. If whole world sure of Israel possessing WMD, then why isn't Israel labelled as one? Lastly, I did not threaten to ask North Korea to launch nuclear attack on Japan. I only said Chinese cooperation is essential to containing the North Korean missile threat. What has that post got to do with this post? Why are you putting words in my mouth? You are the one claiming "Chinese people are inferior, and that China is disease which needs to be cured" so why all you do is mock China, our people, our government and so on? Chinese people are among worlds most diligent and intelligent people, as recognized by most of world's other races. Our government is not perfect, but it has done much to lift China out of poverty and turn our country into economy juggernaut. Even now, the government is defending our sovereignty claims, backed by historical evidence, while Indian troops are trespassing into territory that India doesn't even claim as its own. If war breaks out in Donglong, which I hope it doesn't, Indian troops will be labelled as invaders, while PLA troops will be defending our lands.
    2
  12858. +Adityaa Chaubey Bhutan is does not even maintain any diplomatic relations with any of the UNSC members like Russia, USA, UK, France and China, yet it somehow wants India and Japan to be part of UNSC? Doesn't that mean that its being a puppet of India then? What makes you think the UNSC members will accept Bhutan's decision, when it doesn't even have an embassy in any of our countries? Bhutan narrowly avoided being dragged into a unwanted war with China and India, over Doklam/Donglong, so why would Bhutan want to consult India for help again? China did not mention anything about withdrawal of Bhutan troops (because there were no Bhutan troops present at Doklam) but the government requested withdrawal of Indian troops from Doklam. So isn't apparent that India is the one trying drag Bhutan into unwanted war with China? Bhutanese troops weren't even present in Donglong during the standoff
    2
  12859. +Aniruddh Joshi What makes you claim that "the whole world" saw it according to India's viewpoint at all? According to nytimes.com/2017/07/26/world/asia/dolam-plateau-china-india-bhutan.html Bhutan has felt uncomfortable from the start and does not want to be caught in the middle when China and India are taking potshots at each other. Bhutan does not want to be the bone in a fight between two dogs. You really think Bhutan will be completely unaffected if such a war between India and China erupted, over a mere border dispute, which doesn't even concern India at all? India is the one potentially starting a war, but invading territory that it does not claim for its own and obstructing PLA road construction here. If war had broken out, Indian troops will be the invaders on foreign soil, whereas PLA troops will be fighting to defend our territory from the invaders.
    2
  12860. +Adityaa Chaubey In 1960, Zhou Enlai proposed that India drop its claim to Aksai Chin and China would withdraw its claims from NEFA. That way, both our countries will have sovereignty over territory already controlled by our countries. But Nehru rejected this proposal and refused to negotiate further. Zhou Enlai visited New Delhi 4 times, whereas Nehru only visited Beijing once, so who is more sincere in settling our border disputes here? Nehru pursued an aggressive "Forward" policy of building military outposts at our disputed border. There were eventually 60 such outposts, including 43 north of the McMahon Line, so which country is the one provoking the other one here? Zhou Enlai even proposed a 20 KM demilitarized zone, and withdrew Chinese troops, but Nehru continued to occupy territory that PLA troops had vacated. Who doesn't know whose history well here? Why was Nehru building so many military bases at our disputed border, instead of sitting down to settle border negotiations once at for all? You claim China has no solid evidence support claim to Donglong, then what claim does India have for McMahon line? It was signed by British India and Tibet, which India doesn't recognize as a sovereign state, so why is McMahon line legal? According (tibetjustice.org/materials/treaties/treaties12.html ) Great Britain recognized the suzerainty rights of China over Tibet and agreed not to enter into negotiations with Tibet except through the intermediary of the Chinese Government. But the British broke their agreement and bypassed Chinese intermediary to signed McMahon line directly with Tibet, when Britain itself doesn't recognize Tibetan sovereignty. So why is McMahon line still valid when Britain ignored Chinese input completely?
    2
  12861. "Tried and true" comes with time. Remember that Japanese car brands weren't all that great initially, and had a poor reputation before becoming what they are today. Chinese car brands will get there someday (if they hadn't already).
    2
  12862.  @Esquera123  You said that TMSC will build a chip plant in Arizona desert (of all place). But who is going to work in these chip plants? Who's going to maintain all the machinery in those chip plants? The US domestic semiconductor manufacturing workforce has declined precipitously, down 43 percent from its peak employment levels in 2000. At the same time the US semiconductor industry’s workforce attrition rate is substantial and turnover rates are high. Simply put, even if you build a chip plant in Arizona, USA doesn't have the necessary manpower themselves to run those wafer fab plants effectively.
    2
  12863.  @Esquera123  You said I could continue to talk about China's achievements, so that's why I'm continuing to do so. Besides renewable energy, China is also home to the largest electric vehicle market in the world. Countries by electric vehicle usage (2019) 1. China (3,349,100) 2. United States (1,452,900) 3. Norway (370,800) 4. Rest of the world (318,960) 5. Japan (300,000) 6. France (274,100) 7. United Kingdom (235,700) 8. Germany (230,750) 9. Netherlands (207,900) 10. Canada (147,100)
    2
  12864.  @Esquera123  American leaders have to step down from power after 4-8 years so they can only make short-term plans for America's future, instead of long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. Whereas China has produced 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans etc to map out China's future. Our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050.
    2
  12865.  @Esquera123  Keep boasting as a way of mocking? Then you should be able to handle more of China's achievements over the years, yet you've given up already? And it appears you've thrown in the towel about the whole Arizona chip plant, which you yourself brought up, but are unable to answer the many technical and logistical issues that accompany such an endeavor.
    2
  12866.  @Esquera123  "The US and Taiwan friendship forever." Mainland Chinese have been taught since young to regard the people of Taiwan as part of the family. Whereas most Americans can't even point out where Taiwan island is on the world map. What makes you think US will continue to support Taiwan forever? Americans care more about issues closer to home, such as the border, immigration, rising cost of living, student debt and other issues plaguing America, than they do about an island that many of them can't even locate on the world map. "Taiwan is important to the world, especially TSMC." So if somehow Taiwan no longer had TSMC, does that mean that the world no longer considers Taiwan important? Doesn't mean it is no longer in US's interests to defend that island? Because mainland China's stance is that even if Taiwan no longer had wafer fabrication plants, Taiwan will still be a part of China.
    2
  12867. Chinese government also offer more subsidies for electric cars on our roads, for greener environment and bluer skies.
    2
  12868. Erick Cisneros Chinese don't want a trade war, and we believe trade war has no winners, only losers. But that does not mean China is weak and we will retaliate with our own measures if necessary.
    2
  12869. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    2
  12870. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  12871.  @Camcolito  Chinese workers are certainly doing Americans a favour by making products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that the cost of living in America is kept lower than it should be. Americans flock to Walmart because it's cheap, because Chinese workers are paid less than American workers, yet that guy @Thomas Jamison claims that it's the US government that raised all those people in China out of poverty. China is currently under "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics" where China is in the primary stage of socialism and needed to engage in economic growth before pursuing a more egalitarian form of socialism, with the eventual goal being communism (as described in Marxist orthodoxy). Because *capitalism is killing the planet,*it's the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." The Earth's resources are finite and where capitalism seeks to exhaust them in the name of profits, communism seeks to distribute resources according to needs.
    2
  12872.  @firmaith  "Responsive is affected through procedure, but also externally verified through non partisan agencies" There's a survey by World Economic Forum, posing the question of: "Do you think your country is on the wrong track or right direction?" to citizens of various nations and here are the survey results: China: 10% Wrong Track, 90% Right Direction. Saudi Arabia: 20% Wrong Track, 80% Right Direction. India: 24% Wrong Track, 76% Right Direction. Russia: 42% Wrong Track, 58% Right Direction. Canada: 50% Wrong Track, 50% Right Direction. (Canada is split 50/50) Australia: 55% Wrong Track, 45% Right Direction. Great Britain: 63% Wrong Track, 37% Right Direction. United States: 65% Wrong Track, 35% Right Direction. ... Source: World Economic Forum: Which countries are on the right track, according to their citizens? So it appears that the majority of the people polled in China feel that China is on the right direction, which suggests that the Chinese government is able to deliver what the people want. Whereas in the U.S and many Western democracies, it appears that a significant number of people polled seem to think their countries are on the wrong track. Could it be said then that China is more democratic than those Western democracies?
    2
  12873. ​ @Logos-Nomos  "let Taipei return to rule the nation of China!" But why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) even lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan in the first place? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite these advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and fled to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates the KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communist's right to rule China. Yet you're calling for Taipei to return to rule all of China?
    2
  12874.  @RayCromwell  Chinese universities produce the most STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) out of any other country in the world. Countries With The Most STEM Graduates 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/02/02/the-countries-with-the-most-stem-graduates-infographic/ This implies that China is going to play a much larger role in the STEM fields, given the sheer number of graduates produced in these fields.
    2
  12875. Visit Shanghai to see 10s of years of China's history. Visit Beijing to see 100s of years of China's history. Visit Xi'an to see 1000s of years of China's history. Visit Shenzhen to see the future.
    2
  12876.  @elijahfreeman5299  They don't necessarily have to. That's the beauty of China's 1 Country, 2 Systems principle. China is willing to allow multiple different political systems to coexist within its borders, that's why Hong Kong and Macau have their own separate governments governing their respective regions, while still being considered as part of China. The same could be extended to Taiwan.
    2
  12877. "What's wrong with free trade with products and services between our countries?" Here's an analogy: The global economy is just like a raging, untamed river. Economic forces shift and flow wildly, and a "free trade" policy means you just open your markets and allow anything to happen. That's why USA gets flooded with Chinese goods, and US corporations relocate outside of USA, and hire Chinese labour because its cheaper. But China on the other hand, is "taming the river" and controlling its destructive effects on our local markets. Our local companies are unable to compete in a global market, so we protect them at home and slowly let them gain experience locally, until they are able to venture out on their own. Huawei is one such local company that is beginning to penetrate other markets overseas. So isn't this a much better approach, then just adopting "free trade" and allowing economic forces to flow unchecked?
    2
  12878.  @alanoh3069  There was no indication of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus back in 2019. The first human-to-human transmission case in China was confirmed only on 20th Jan 2020 and that's when the government began implementing quarantine measures shortly after. Source: China confirms human-to-human transmission of Sars-like virus ft.com/content/15e474cc-3b2a-11ea-a01a-bae547046735 The government is acting based on actual information gleamed from the ground. Not rumours and hearsay.
    2
  12879.  Ganda Gandara  Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that the cost of living in India is kept to a minimum. Think about the billions of dollars Indians have saved on living expenses over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursuits like cars, motorcycles, housing, luxury brands, school fees, tuition fees, and so on.
    2
  12880. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  12881. Greater China dominates global microchip production, controlling around half of the worldwide export market. Here's a list of countries/states by integrated circuit exports in 2019: 1. Hong Kong, China ($134,483 million) 2. Mainland China ($102,187 million) 3. Taiwan, China ($100,408 million) 4. South Korea ($79,082 million) 5. Singapore ($76,868 million) 6. Malaysia ($44,794 million) 7. United States ($40,099 million) 8. Japan ($27,791 million) 9. Vietnam ($26,084 million) 10. Philippines ($18,991 million) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by integrated circuit exports
    2
  12882.  @cjthebeesknees  Censorship on YouTube is really getting worse.
    2
  12883. Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous affair with a much older man has been exposed, and she's expressed a desire for personal privacy in a videocall with IOC. But the WTA would have none of that, and they are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see, instead of respecting her wish for privacy.
    2
  12884. @Unbroken How is supporting China akin to supporting the spread of a virus? With regards to Covid-19, China observes a strict zero Covid policy and thanks to that, China has a comparatively lower number of Covid cases and deaths despite having 20% of the world's population, compared to the United States having 4% of the world's population but home to 25% of the world's Covid-19 cases and deaths.
    2
  12885.  @Andy-P  Taiwan’s minimum wage has stagnated for such a long time that the government needs to raise it by two to three times to meet the cost of living or catch up with other advanced economies, including the 27 European Union (EU27) countries. - The New Lens
    2
  12886.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou China is looking to be self-sufficient in everything and is having more state control." Many countries (including the U.S) are looking towards self-sufficiency and having more state control (see Wikipedia: Protectionism) so does that mean that they are following the North Korean model?
    2
  12887.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Check and balance refer to the feedback and limitations on the executive decisions of the government." What checks and balances were applied to the controversial abortion law? The US Supreme Court has overturned the constitutional right to an abortion by reversing Roe v. Wade. Thousands protested the Supreme Court's decision to overturn this law and opinion polls show that a majority of Americans want abortion legal in all or most cases.
    2
  12888.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "If the Chinese government wants it done, they simply will do it." Last year, Beijing had initially planned to implement a vexed mandate, but scrapped the idea after facing intense backlash online by Chinese netizens to the mandate, so how is this the Chinese government simply doing what it wants? On the other hand, in Canada there were Canadian truckers protesting against mandates, but the Canadian government responded by freezing the trucker's bank accounts.
    2
  12889.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Even if it turns out to be a failure financially or economically or structurally, the government doesn't have to bear responsibility for it." Are you serious? The Chinese government clearly bears all responsibility for any failures. Who else is there to blame in a one-party system, you tell me? Whereas in the United States for example, the two parties often blame each other for America's failures, while taking credit for any successes. In the end, what responsibility is there for their government to bear? For example, the given the shambolic withdrawal of U.S troops from Afghanistan after nearly 20 years, and after pouring trillions into Afghanistan, who bears the responsibility? No one, it appears.
    2
  12890.  @bartonlee3594  "Great analysis, my friend." Mark Yeung claimed that there are checks and balances in the United States, yet the U.S Supreme Court is able to overturn the constitutional right to an abortion by reversing Roe v. Wade, then how is this a good analysis?
    2
  12891.  @bartonlee3594  "True. The fiscal aspects of infrastructure need to be accounted for." The U.S government is unable to account for where all the weapons and money that they send to Ukraine goes to. Also, the U.S is unable to account for the appearance of the white powdery substance in the White House.
    2
  12892.  @bartonlee3594  "Yes, very strange how he likes the Imperial China of old." What's so strange about liking a political system that has served China successfully for 5,000 years? History has much to teach us, if only we would listen to it. And history is telling China that a governing system consisting of a strong central government is the correct way to go for China. Is there any reason why China should abandon this system and adopt Western-style democracy?
    2
  12893.  @bartonlee3594  "True. you can't count on natural resources and endless infrastructure projects forever." Well, then why not tell the U.S to stop depending on Saudi oil and other natural resources then? There are plenty of countries outside of the West, that are willing to purchase Saudi Arabian oil and also Russian oil. Also, there is an endless need for infrastructure projects across the world, as more developing countries become developed, then how is it that you can't count on them? Africa, South America and South East Asia are rising and China is seeking win-win cooperation with those countries, whereas the U.S only sees a zero sum game.
    2
  12894.  @Andy-P  "North Korea has completely de-coupled. I'm only saying that is the direction I think China is taking." North Korea is only forced to do so, because the U.S slapped sanctions on their country and stymied their economic growth. If you examine it carefully, N.Korea's goal is not de-coupling, in fact, N. Korea has been calling upon the U.S for sanctions to be lifted from it. In other words, North Korea wants to do more business with other countries, not de-couple.
    2
  12895.  @Andy-P  Chinese can buy land in the West because Westerners put their lands up for sale, and the Chinese are purchasing those lands legally. Whereas in China, all land belongs to the Chinese people, so at the most, the government grants a 70-year lease. So if anything, it looks as though China's system is better, because it ensures that our lands won't become the property of other countries.
    2
  12896.  @Andy-P  You said: "Yes. If you only read CCP media.." Most of my information presented here comes from Western sources like the National Institutes of Health, The New Lens, Global Trade Alert, Wikipedia and so on.
    2
  12897.  @bartonlee3594  "given that he doesn't have access to global data (censored in China)." I've literally cited Western sources like the National Institutes of Health, The New Lens, Global Trade Alert, Wikipedia and so on, but you just continue to ignore my sources and claim I don't have access to global data.
    2
  12898.  @barryford1482  For your information, Falun Gong followers even held a parade in New York City, celebrating the Chinese victims of the Sichuan Earthquake back in 2008 Video: Falun Gong - Celebrates the deaths of Chinese victims of the Sichuan Earthquake in a NYC parade youtu.be/1bvydC-Biyc
    2
  12899.  @barryford1482  The problem is that much of the West choose to do nothing about these cults, claiming "freedom of speech/religion." But when China tries to do something, it gets labelled in a bad light by the West.
    2
  12900.  eQuilibrium 2  Well,  @Barry Ford  himself did claim that his country Australia was not stolen or invaded it was settled, so you might be right there.
    2
  12901.  @djunasidharta3812  China has history of cults, even back during Qing Dynasty China (1850—1864) there was a man, Hong Xiuquan (洪秀全) who proclaimed himself "Son of God" and "Brother to Jesus" and rallied support from cult followers to overthrow the Qing government, resulting in one of the bloodiest rebellions in history, the Taiping Rebellion (太平天国运动) where an estimated 30-50 million dead. All because of one man and his huge cult following. This is one reason why China is very strict on cults today.
    2
  12902.  @barryford1482  Previously, Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region used to be plagued by terrorist attacks perpetrated by misguided Ughurs such as the 1992 Ürümqi bombings, the 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings, the 2010 Aksu bombing, the 2011 Hotan attack, 2011 Kashgar attacks, and the 2014 Ürümqi attack Source: 1992 Ürümqi bombings wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_bombings Source: 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings wikipedia.org/wiki/1997_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_bus_bombings Source: 2010 Aksu bombing wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Aksu_bombing Source: 2011 Hotan attack wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Hotan_attack Source: 2011 Kashgar attacks wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Kashgar_attacks Source: April 2014 Ürümqi attack wikipedia.org/wiki/April_2014_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_attack But thanks to the government program in Xinjiang, there have been no more terrorist attacks in Xinjiang since.
    2
  12903.  @barryford1482  I showed people this short 3-min video of Ürümqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience).
    2
  12904.  @hyc1266  The thing is that Islamic countries can promote Islam in their lands, just like Christian countries can promote Christianity in theirs. But since China is currently atheist under the Communist Party of China, then it should be a given that China will promote atheism in our lands. If Religious countries can promote their religion, then atheist countries should be allowed to do the same with atheism.
    2
  12905. China is home to world's fastest supercomputer, the Sunway Taihui Light 神威·太湖之光 and during a 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source:China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance https://www.cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/
    2
  12906.  @ne0ge049  Didn't General Mark Milley made a phone call to his Chinese counterpart (General Li Zuocheng) where he assured him that the U.S will NOT attack China?
    2
  12907.  @Carbuncle0168  The world's first quantum computing machine youtu.be/Vw1bKuSe49A
    2
  12908.  @Carbuncle0168  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar (Burma), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a Map of all the territory Taiwan claims (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg )
    2
  12909.  @ianofliverpool7701  Why people keep on asking Cyrus Janssen how much he was paid? Are like his tax collector or something? Does he have to file his income tax return to you or something?
    2
  12910.  @Carbuncle0168  "神州 Shenzhou that just mean that Taiwan is Legitimate government of all China." Then why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the Communists right to rule China.
    2
  12911.  @andreipopescu349  If you're referring to serpentza's latest video, you should at least know by now that serpentza and c-milk have a history of lying, (i.e he lied that Dune movie posters in China omitted black actress Sharon Ducan-Brewster, and it has since been debunked.) What makes you think that his latest accusations against Cyrus are true then?
    2
  12912. @Sheriff Lobo "神州 Shenzhou Cyrus Janssen's message is clear and that is that he wants money." Cyrus Janssen's message is that he's promoting peace and cooperation between the US and China, how is it not apparent? His positive message of "Building Bridges, Not Wars" is clearly better than the alternative of potential war, promoted by the U.S military industrial complex. You said: "If he wasn't he wouldn't seek money from patreon." Is that so? So many YouTube Channels (many of whom are unrelated to matters pertaining to China or USA) also seek money from Patreon so all of them want money is that what you're saying? Then you're describing virtually every YouTube channel.
    2
  12913.  @David-og7di  "Taiwan doesn't need Pooh bears agreement. ..it is already independent." If Taiwan was truly independent like you claim then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations or the World Health Organization? Is there some force that's preventing Taiwan from joining the UN or the WHO?
    2
  12914.  @David-og7di  You said: "神州 Shenzhou because Chinese made stuff is only half as good" Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone brands like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, Realme, OnePlus, and so on. Here's a list of Top 10 Mobile Phone Brands in World 2021 according to MBA Skool. Top 10 Mobile Phone Brands in World 2021 Ranking List Rank 1. Samsung (South Korean) Rank 2. Huawei (Chinese) Rank 3. Apple (American) Rank 4. Xiaomi (Chinese) Rank 5. Oppo (Chinese) Rank 6. Vivo (Chinese) Rank 7. LG (South Korean) Rank 8. ZTE (Chinese) Rank 9. Lenovo (Chinese) Rank 10. Realme (Chinese) ... Source: MBA Skool: Top 10 Mobile Phone Brands in World 2021 Ranking List Interestingly, where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? Can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of mainland China?
    2
  12915. @Sheriff Lobo "神州 Shenzhou Shenzhou I'm going to submit the form to the CRA. They can determine that for themselves. Canada's tax law is similar to that of my country." So apparently, you're not even a Canadian citizen yourself then why are you so concerned with his income tax details in Canada? It clearly doesn't affect you, yet earlier you already convicted him of being engaged in tax fraud? And now you're saying it's up to the Canadian authorities?
    2
  12916. @Sheriff Lobo "神州 Shenzhou the leaked emails shows he is solicited to make videos for CGTV and he takes payment directly from CGTN." If you're referring to serpentza's latest video, you should know that serpentza has a history of lying to his audiences (i.e. like when serpentza and c-milk lied about Dune movie poster in China omitting black actress Sharon Duncan Brewster, which has since been debunked.) Additionally, serpentza has previously pulled off a similar "email leak" with Jayoe Nation, the Barretts, which have also been similarly debunked, so is there really any credibility to serpentza's latest video about Cyrus Janssen?
    2
  12917.  @dflatt1783  "神州 Shenzhou Cyres's actions include spreading false narratives created by the CCP for money. How does that promote peace? It promotes hostility." It promotes peace because it helps Americans (and other Westerners) to better understand China, instead of Western MSM attempting to "manufacture consent" for war. Remember when former U.S president Bush invaded Iraq on suspicion of harboring Weapons of Mass Destruction? It turns out that there were no evidence of WMDs in Iraq, which defeats the goal of the invasion in the first place. Now it appears that Western MSM is trying to drum up support for potential war against China, with "human rights issues" being the new fake WMDs claim.
    2
  12918.  @David-og7di  "神州 Shenzhou er....nope. KMT lost due to CKS being unable to reign in venal regional warlords." So during the Chinese Civil War, the KMT had a massive army and funding from the United States, yet they still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? Then it demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, as well as cementing the communists' right to rule China. And China's current political system has shown to be viable (and extremely successful to boot, just look at the successful handling of Covid19 in China, compared to Western democracies) then is there really a need to abandon our political system and adopt the Western brand of democracy? Not all countries have to adopt Western brand of democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    2
  12919. @Sheriff Lobo "神州 Shenzhou the CRA have formal powers to compell financial information over. The application of taxing statutes is predicated by facts and evidence." Yes, but once again, you aren't Canadian yourself apparently, then what business is it of you to submit someone else's income tax forms on his behalf? Since you claim it's up to Canadian authorities to determine whether he's acted fraudulently based on the information or the veracity of evidence contained in the videos, then why are you already claiming he's guilty when you said: "神州 Shenzhou he's engaged in tax fraud."?
    2
  12920. @Sheriff Lobo Why'd you claim that "he's engaged in tax fraud." then you walk back your claims saying that it's up to the Canadian authorities to determine whether he's acted fraudulently based on the information or the veracity of evidence contained in the videos? It's like you're already presuming Cyrus is guilty when even you admit that the information needs to be verified first.
    2
  12921. @Sheriff Lobo "神州 Shenzhou the leaked emails shows he is solicited to make videos for CGTV..." I watched serpentza's video about the leaked emails, and if the emails are real, it turns out Cyrus Janssen had earlier published a video entitled: "Americans Don't Understand The Truth About China", and it was actually CGTN that requested to publish his video on CGTN website. So Cyrus wasn't really solicited to make videos for CGTN, it was CGTN that requested to publish HIS video that's all, not that he was making videos for CGTN.
    2
  12922.  @dflatt1783  "神州 Shenzhou There are no suicide nets in US factories." Those suicide nets in factories in China were part of U.S companies like Apple and Nike after they came to China and set up shop here. China had virtually no factories at that time when Deng Xiaoping introduced economic reforms, and the poor working conditions were a result of American corporations like Apple and Nike, even the Chinese government has fined Apple numerous times for their poor working conditions.
    2
  12923.  @dflatt1783  The same reason they are here and not in USA is because the U.S government allows it. Then what's your point? That the U.S companies had poor working conditions for Chinese workers? Then we are in agreement, and the Chinese government fined Apple several times for poor working conditions.
    2
  12924. @UCN76XDz-nbMLgK1gCfTpnJw "神州 Shenzhou the leaked emails shows he is solicited to make videos for CGTV..." Actually, if the email was true then it's actually CGTN that approached Cyrus Janssen for permission to publish HIS video entitled: "Americans Don't Know The Truth About China" so how is that proof that he's making videos for CGTN?
    2
  12925.  @CyrusJanssen  There's no rush, take your time to formulate your response. The problem with people like serpentza is that they constantly churn out such videos only to be debunked later. There's really no end to the amount of debunking to do.
    2
  12926.  @dflatt1783  "神州 Shenzhou Name a specific company NOW that has poor working conditions for Chinese workers in the US please." Hundreds of U.S companies make use of prison labor, directly or through subcontractors including Microsoft, Boeing, Starbucks, Victoria's Secret and others. They are paid wages of $1 an hour working for the government, or $6 an hour working for private. That's the prison labor that is occurring in the USA, in which USA is accusing China of.
    2
  12927.  @dflatt1783  1. The USA literally funds revolutionary forces to overthrow governments through the National Endowment for Democracy 2. The USA is not willing to take responsibility for dronestrike killing an Afghan family in Kabul (including women and children). The U.S general just apologise and there's no consequence for his decision. 3. The USA has no accountability after they lost a 20-year war in Afghanistan, pouring trillions into the war and leaving behind billions of dollars of U.S military equipment for the Taliban. 4. Image is more important to the USA, because Biden has to "act tough" on China even though it's at the expense of Americans if US-China relations deteriorate further.
    2
  12928.  @dflatt1783  "One day your regime will understand the folly of rigidness when governing people. It will be a hard lesson." China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    2
  12929.  @dflatt1783  神州 Shenzhou Prisoners in the US are not subcontracted to work for any private industry. That is incorrect sir. Video: Prison labor booms in US as low-cost inmates bring billions youtu.be/CySzoJFkTA8
    2
  12930.  @dflatt1783  1. Then why are you accusing China of what USA is clearly doing? 2. The U.S. called the errant attack that killed 10 family members in Afghanistan a "tragic mistake." But nearly a month later, no compensation has been sent. 3. The U.S has basically lost (or not won) every war after WWII, from Vietnam War to Korean War (stalemate) and now Afghan War. Where's the accountability to justify USA spending trillions of dollars fighting wars on other countries turf? 4. About so-called IP theft, those American companies choose to come to China and they agreed to transfer technologies as part of the terms of setting up shop here in China. China did not point a gun at American companies and force them to hand over their technology, if they refused, then they could simply pack up and take their business out of China. But they readily agreed to transfer technology to China, the how is that considered IP theft?
    2
  12931.  @dflatt1783  "Plus if we don't like our leader he will be gone. It's called democracy." That's why American politicians are more concerned about "appearances" and popularity polls than they are about solving the fundamental problems faced by ordinary Americans today. "About the military equipment, without parts and skilled technicians it won't run for long. You are as ignorant as the average American. Try harder." It's not really my problem, it's the average American taxpayers money that's goes into the U.S weapons abandoned for the Taliban. Yet where's the "accountability" for American tax payers money being basically "gifted" to the Taliban?
    2
  12932.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Since people believe that it's up to CRA to determine whether Cyrus has done anything untoward, why are people acting like he's already guilty when it is yet to be proven? It's like people are taking the matter into their own hands, without giving Cyrus the benefit of the doubt.
    2
  12933.  @dflatt1783  "神州 Shenzhou Ahhh arrogance. There it is. How long has the CCP been in power?" China celebrated our 70th anniversary with a huge parade. Previously under the "democratic" Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) China was a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country. But fast forward till today, and the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 (1949~) has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made-In-China) having world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    2
  12934.  @dflatt1783  "With authoritarianism it took China 5000 years to pull itself out of the gutter onto the curb." Britain was colonial superpower during 19th century but was eventually overtaken by USA in 20th century. But prior to that, China (and also India) had been economic superpower for 1800 years and we made up 25% of the world's GDP share, according to world leading British economist, Angus Maddison. So since China has been successfully governed for millennia under authoritarianism then can't China continue with our current political system? Not all countries have to adopt Western brand of democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    2
  12935.  @shenanigan111  Why not attempt to refute my points instead of seemingly resorting to insults against me for my views? I mean, over 70 years ago, nobody thought China would succeed yet fast forward till today and look at how far China has prospered under the leadership of the Communist Party of China? It's like many Westerners are unwilling to accept the success of China's governing system, and saying anything even remotely positive about China to the West has become a taboo.
    2
  12936.  @dflatt1783  "神州 Shenzhou burying it's citizens along the way by the tens of millions." Then why is China currently the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people? And if you want to talk about prison populations, it's actually the United States that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes, the U.S government releases convicts back onto the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons.
    2
  12937.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvests and mass starvation. I mean, even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. Chairman Mao is the man who eventually succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country after the Communist Revolution and founded the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949, whereas the previous Nationalist KMT government failed to do so for 37 years during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949). If not for Mao Zedong, we won't even have a unified China today to even talk about, that's how important Chairman Mao is to China.
    2
  12938.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Since you brought them up, serpentza and c-milk have a history of lying to their audiences. For example, they claimed that the Dune movie posters in China omitted black actress Sharon Duncan Brewster. But this has since been debunked because the movie posters in China do show that actress in them, so what makes you seem to think serpentza and c-milk are reliable in their narrative?
    2
  12939.  @JHeb_  "People like this will probably suffer a lot of social lynch after the collapse of CC///P, when a lot of hidden truth will be uncovered and officially admitted." Why do you want the Communist Party of China to collapse? The CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic thing to happen to China? Because many Westerners can't stand to see China rising under our own political system?
    2
  12940.  @JHeb_  "Incredible how dedicated he is to this belief." You want to know why? Because I see the deteriorating U.S-China relations and that we are on the path to potential war, which would not only be bad for our countries, but also for the world. Cyrus Janssen's message is clear: "Build Bridges, Not Walls" and the way to go about building bridges is to help people understand what the other side is thinking. As for Cyrus being "one-sided", he's an American after all, and he can't possibly change China's political system. But what Americans can do is advocate for change to U.S' seemingly warmongering attitude, to bring US-China relations back onto the path of peace, not war.
    2
  12941.  @JHeb_  "神州 Shenzhou I explained it in more detail in a comment that is constantly being deleted." So apparently YouTube is constantly deleting your messages? So much for those boasts of "freedom of speech" that I've often heard from anti-China people, it's clear that censorship exists in YouTube. But so many people rather act blind to that fact, and just blame China when censorship does exist in many countries and social media platforms.
    2
  12942.  @JHeb_  You said: "Basically its about common history knowledge and consequence, that every major tot///alitarian power eventually collapsed and for CC///P it will be not different." China has 5,000 years of history whereas the Western brand of democracy (i.e Liberal Democracy) has like what? Only 100-200 years of history? Then that doesn't automatically mean that such a system will be successful. In fact, if you look at thousand of years of human history, most of humanity lived under an authoritarian government of sorts, where political power was concentrated in the hands of the few, be it the nobles (aristocracy), the priest (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy). Such political systems were predominant because they were stable and they worked.
    2
  12943.  @JHeb_  "As long as CC///P causes terror among multiple min///orities and social groups, by various bru///tal ways, it is a thre///at to the well-being and progress of humanity as a whole." Ethnic minorities in China enjoy special privileges over the Han. Ethnic minorities like Tibetans, Uighurs, Manchus, Mongols, etc, are exempted from the One-Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Ethnic minorities enjoy special tax exemptions, priority in healthcare, free education for up to 15 years, government bursaries and so on, over the Han. Even in applying for university course, if a Han candidate needs say 600 points to qualify for a certain university course, then an ethnic minority needs only say 300 points (easier to qualify) for the exact same course.
    2
  12944.  @JHeb_  "Major difference is that YouTube is not a state-run media. It is private company." That means that the private corporations control the social media. And you know what drives corporations? Profit, not morals. In China, the Chinese government controls the Chinese corporations for China's benefit, reining in our companies when they strayed too far. Whereas in the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit, at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    2
  12945.  @JHeb_  "I love how Ch///ina always says that they are the one that wants peace and everyone else is a bully. Every tota///litarian government wants nothing else but peace. But only on their conditions." On their conditions? Who's the country from halfway across the globe, "imposing their conditions" onto China's internal affairs in Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Taiwan? Answer: the United States. Just like the United States "imposed democracy" onto Afghanistan for 20 years, yet after U.S abandoned Kabul, the democratically-elected Afghan President Ghani fled the country with truckloads of U.S cash, and the 300,000 strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban in weeks with barely any resistance.
    2
  12946.  @dflatt1783  Do you or your 7 year old niece even know about thousands of years of human history? Western brand of democracy (Liberal Democracy) is rather new to history, having around 100-200 years of history, whereas for 1000-2000 years, countries overwhelmingly had authoritarian forms of government (i.e monarchy, aristocracy, theocracy) and many were successful far beyond the 100-200 years of Western democracy. For example: Achaemenid Empire, Aksumite Empire, Armenian Empire, Neo-Assyrian Empire, Babylonian Empire, Byzantine Empire, Egyptian Empire, and so on. History is telling us that authoritarian systems were the norm throughout most of human history, whereas Liberal Democracy only has some 100-200 years of history, that's not an automatic guarantee of a successful political system. Even right now, we can see Liberal Democracy is seemingly tearing at the seams.
    2
  12947.  @dflatt1783  You really believe those organ harvesting rumors? Tell me, why hasn't any world leader like U.S President Biden, Canadian PM Trudeau, Russian President Putin, French President Macron, Australian PM Morrison, German Chancellor Merkel, Indian PM Modi, (or any other world leader) spoke to Chinese President Xi about those organ harvests?
    2
  12948.  @JHeb_  Tibet is part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Tibet broke free of China in 1913 but wasn't recognised as an independent country and it was reincorporated back into China by 1951.
    2
  12949.  @JHeb_  Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us. And go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    2
  12950.  @dflatt1783  "神州 Shenzhou No immediate response? That Taiwan thing was a gut punch." You can't even name me any world leader who takes the organ harvesting rumors seriously. And go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China under their constitution. Since there hasn't been any amendments, then Taiwan is part of China under their constitution.
    2
  12951.  @seekthetruth1478  If you watched serpentza's video, then if the emails were true, then Cyrus Janssen had previously published his video entitled: "Americans Don't Understand The Truth About China" earlier, and it was CGTN that approached him to ask for permission to publish HIS video on their website. Yet the anti-China people are twisting the order of events when it was Cyrus own video that CGTN asked for permission to publish.
    2
  12952.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  "神州 Shenzhou Mao ordered for sparrows to be killed which is a natural predator of locusts." But Chinese farmers kept insect-eating livestock like chickens and ducks and our rice fields had insect-eating frogs and fishes. Sparrows are not the only natural predator of locusts.
    2
  12953.  @dflatt1783  "神州 Shenzhou I bet it burns you up that you can't control the narrative outside of your own borders. Maybe one day the CCP will take over the world!" This is what many Westerners are afraid of. It's the combination of Red Scare (fear of communism) and Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West. Since the 19th century, many have grown so thoroughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States as the world's largest economy, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    2
  12954.  @dflatt1783  "神州 Shenzhou That's funny that 'Taiwan is a part of China'. I don't see the US doing hostile fly overs over Iowa." I don't see mainland _People's Liberation Army Airforce (PLAAF) fighters flying over Taiwan island. PLAAF jet fighters flown in international airspace after all.
    2
  12955.  @dflatt1783  You said: "I don't see the UK building fake islands (or is that fake too? lol)." The United Kingdom kicked off the natives of Chagos Islands to build a military base FOR THE U.S.A. Even the International Court of Justice recently ruled the U.K occupation of Chagos as illegal. Video:youtu.be/Vb5OKrYzZp8?t=25
    2
  12956.  @dflatt1783  "神州 Shenzhou Who does Taiwan's government answer to? Not the CCP." If you claim Taiwan is independent and does not answer to the CPC, then why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations or the World Health Organization? Is there some force that's preventing Taiwan from joining the UN or the WHO?
    2
  12957.  @MarkYeung1  Mainland PLAAF fighter jets clearly flew over international airspace, and if you measure the distance of their flight, they were actually closer to mainland China than Taiwan island. It's the aerial equivalent of "freedom of navigation" of airspace.
    2
  12958.  @JHeb_  You sent me a link to a video in which you have administrative power over all the comments. So I will not post there, because of the possibility that you may decide to erase my comments in that video's comment section. However, I will respond to those responses you put there.
    2
  12959.  @MarkYeung1  How so? Polls indicate that majority of the people of Taiwan want the status quo to continue, not independence.
    2
  12960.  @JHeb_  In your other post, you wrote: "First of all, democracy started in ancient Greece." And it is shown that Greek democracy failed. Spartan democracy failed, Athenian democracy failed, even the Republic of Rome eventually crumbled. These earlier "proto-democracies" weren't successful and modern Western democracy only has 100-200 years of history, so it's not guaranteed to be successful. Look at U.S democratic experiment in Afghanistan and it failed after 20 years and pouring trillions into Afghanistan, the democratically elected Afghan president Ghani fled with truckloads of U.S cash and the 300,000 strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban in weeks with barely any resistance.
    2
  12961.  @MarkYeung1  "You didn't not mention that Hong Kong and Beijing governments did not respond to the peaceful demonstration of Hong Kong." Didn't Carrie Lam cancelled the Hong Kong Extradition Bill? Yet the Hong Kong rioters still became violent and therefore the Hong Kong National Law was enacted and now Hong Kong is a peace. Article 23 of Hong Kong Basic Law (香港基本法第二十三條) also supports the National Security law to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government (i.e Beijing).
    2
  12962.  @MarkYeung1  Since you and I both agree that majority of the people of Taiwan want the status quo to continue, then the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China and since there hasn't been any amendments, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Only a minority of the people of Taiwan want independence.
    2
  12963. Russian MiGs are sometimes known as "Flying Coffins" due to the number of crashes over the years. 1993 – two MiG-29s of the Russian Air Force collided in mid-air. 17 Oct 2008 – a MiG-29 crashed in southern Siberia. 5 Dec 2008 – a MiG-29 lost part of its tail section due to corrosion and crashed in southern Siberia. 2010 – a MiG-31 crashed in the Perm Krai. 6 Sept 2011 – a MiG-31 on a training mission crashed in the Perm Krai. 4 June 2015 – a MiG-29 fighter crashed and was completely destroyed. 5 July 2015 – a MiG-29 crashed near Krasnodarsk reportedly due to a fire onboard. 14 Nov 2016 – a Mig-29 crashed in the Mediterranean while attempting to land on aircraft carrier. The Indian Air Force also buys Russian MiGs and lost half of its pilots to deadly MiG crashes. 15 Jul 2013 – A MiG-21 crashed while landing at Uttarlai airbase. 8 Nov 2013 – A MiG-29 crashed near Jamnagar minutes after it took off. 27 May 2014 – A MIG-21 crashed in Bijbehara area of Anantnag district in Kashmir. 31 Jan 2015 – A MiG-21 crashed west of Jamnagar city on into a mangrove forest. 8 May 2015 – MiG-27 crashed in West Bengal’s Tantipara area. 24, 2015 – A MiG-21 crashed near a village in Budgam district of Jammu and Kashmir. 2016 – A MiG 27 crashed in Jodhpur, Rajasthan. There is a reason why Chinese government decided build our own jet fighters instead. I got nothing against Russian military hardware and it is thanks to Russian jets that China has the foundation necessary to manufacture fighter jets of our own.
    2
  12964. whk wole China has also helped provide financial support to USA as well. For example, China bought $1.2 trillion dollars ($1,200,000,000,000) worth of US debt to help USA tide over the 2008 financial crisis and to recover from it faster.
    2
  12965. @North Korea Is Best Korea Even the United States recognize Taiwan as part of China since the 1972 Shanghai Communique and does not challenge this position. "On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique... The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position." ... Source: The Diplomat: Shanghai Communique
    2
  12966. @North Korea Is Best Korea The 1972 Shanghai Communique pledged that the United States "acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China" and that the United States Government does not challenge that position. Even till today, the United States maintains the position that Taiwan is part of China.
    2
  12967. @North Korea Is Best Korea I've already refuted it, I pointed out that in 1971, the UN countries democratically voted to recognize PRC as China and to kick Taiwan out of the UN Security Council.
    2
  12968. @North Korea Is Best Korea China is a firm supporter of the United Nations in its role in addressing global challenges, upholding peace and security, and promoting common development, according to China's permanent representative to the United Nations, Zhang Jun. In a press briefing on China's Security Council presidency for the month of August, Zhang said that the United Nations is a banner of multilateralism and a symbol of collective strength and that its role will remain irreplaceable no matter how the international situation may change. However, he said, the United Nations does not exist in a vacuum. The strength of the world body originates from the support and contribution of its member states. ... Source: China is a firm supporter of UN: Chinese UN ambassador
    2
  12969.  @ayi3455  "神州 Shenzhou yet China put the blame on USA or to other countries as origin of the virus" Just because China was the first to identify the mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019, doesn't necessarily mean that China is the origin of the coronavirus. For example, traces of Covid-19 have been found in Barcelona sewers in Spain, since before the outbreak in Wuhan then can't China ask me other countries to investigate the virus origins in their lands?
    2
  12970. +Aniruddh Joshi Chinese government has produced maps and historical documents of Doklam, as well as 1890 agreement to support our claims, unlike Bhutan. If India is making advances to reclaim its territory, then it better act fast, before Pakistan solidifies its foothold. Otherwise, Pakistan currently controls it and is currently developing it together with China. We are simply the businessmen there. Our projects are business venture between Pakistan and China, and is primarily to improve Pakistan's economy. As Pakistan is neighbor to both our countries, wouldn't it serve India's interest if Pakistan becomes more developed and stable? You claim India to be civilized nation, yet you send troops into disputed territories to "solve" problems and avoid all diplomatic channels with China? Aren't you the one being hypocritical here about India's actions?
    2
  12971. As far as I know, Chinese government really gifted those shipment of weapons to Philippines "free of charge" and President Duterte has expressed gratitude to China for the shipment of weapons. It is no secret that Philippines has many domestic issues and sometimes a firmer approach is needed to rid the country of problems. You people living in developed countries are unaware of such realities but people like Duterte know what's life like in Philippines and the obstacles preventing the country from progressing beyond poverty. Why blame the president when he was lawfully elected by the people of Philippines? Duterte has to deal with reality of armed extremists groups hiding out in Philippines' many islands and jungles so it is apparent that any help from China, even in the form of weapons is much appreciated by Philippines authorities.
    2
  12972. +Ryan Lajara Since exactly when does USA follow UN and the international law? For example, the USA suspected Iraq of harboring Weapons of Mass Destruction, but UN did not agree to let Iraq be invaded. So US President Bush formed a coalition to invade Iraq in 2003, resulting in mass civilian causalities. The Iraq Body Count project estimated over 100,000 Iraqi civilians causalities as result of Iraq war. In the end, no WMD was ever found in Iraq. The then UN Secretary General, Kofi Annan, called the US invasion of Iraq as not in conformity with the UN charter and was illegal. If China wanted Asia for itself, then why is China building infrastructure to help developing economies to grow, like Pakistan Economic Corridor project, and even in Africa as well? China has pledged billions of dollars to aid African development, building roads, railways, schools, hospitals, hotels, shopping centers, football stadiums, and telecommunication projects. You claim China want ASIAN hegemony, but China does not have any overseas military bases (except for the one in Djibouti). In contrast, USA wants WORLD hegemony, which is why it has over 500+ military bases even in Okinawa Japan, South Korea and of course, the Philippines. Source: Wikipedia: List of countries with overseas military bases en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_overseas_military_bases So, its because of the above reasons, why I believe USA is the greater evil, since it wants to maintain its global hegemony at all costs.
    2
  12973. +Ryan Lajara Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990, during the start of the Gulf War. But I am talking about the 2nd Iraq war (the one in 2003) when President Bush ordered invasion of Iraq on suspicion of harboring WMD. Chemical weapons were found in Gulf War (1990) but as far as I know, USA did not find any new evidence of WMD during Iraqi war (2003), which was the basis for the US invasion. Even today, USA is still at war with Middle East countries, whereas China is not at war with any country currently, so why do you still China as the greater evil here? Why you believe because a coalition of states support a country, tells that it is not a very evil move? During WW2, Germany, Japan and Italy formed the Axis powers, means that it is not a evil move? What about further back in history, during Boxing Rebellion in China, where 8 nations (USA, UK, France, Russia, Italy, ... ... even Japan) invaded China to steal our territories, plunder our wealth, kill our men and even rape our women? After the Rebellion, China's territory was carved up like a pie and given to the victorious countries. Just because more Allies group together, means that it is not evil? What logic is this? I have never said what China does is for free. China runs a business, not a charity and in such business arrangements, both sides agree on the terms of the transaction, so both sides benefit. China is not forcing those countries to do business if they don't want to. But what about European colonialism in Africa, in which they colonize Africa and plunder it of its resources, while importing African slaves to work in their countries? What about genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, so that Europeans can occupy their lands and live in those countries? Isn't that the much greater evil here? What makes you think having US bases in their territory, means that the US treated them well? In South Korea, there is prostitution for US servicemen stationed there and in Okinawa Japan, the US servicemen can rape the local Okinawans with impunity, and the Japanese government can't do anything about it. Source: Thousands protest at US bases on Okinawa after Japanese woman's murder theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/19/thousands-protest-at-us-bases-on-okinawa-after-japanese-womans Also, Philippines was once Spanish colony, but Americans promised to grant Philippines independence. After Spanish defeated, Americans refuse to grant Philippines Independence and fought to conquer the country instead. This resulted in Philippine American war of 1899. The Americans massacred men, women, children, prisoners and captives, active insurgents etc. After the whole thing, 4,000 American soldiers died, 20,000 Filipino Soldiers died, and a whopping quarter million Filipino civilians died as a result of this war. The Philippine American War youtube.com/watch?v=bN2wrZGcs8s Thus, its because of the above reasons, why I claim USA is the greater evil. You may think that these wars are in the past, but look at America today, and isn't it still at war with Middle East countries? What makes you think USA won't start another war again? China today is at peace, and instead of waging war, we are helping poorer countries in Africa and Asia to develop their countries, so how is China considered the greater evil here? There are some sovereignty disputes, but it is bloodless and there hasn't been any outright war, unlike USA and the Middle East.
    2
  12974.  @yslee1401  Look at Taiwan parliament members fighting among themselves, throwing furniture and water balloons (they actually prepared those?) Taiwan is suffering under democracy, whereas mainland China is thriving. Video: Taiwanese parliament broke out into a water balloon and chair-throwing brawl youtu.be/mMvkusAI9DM
    2
  12975.  @billyehh  "神州 Shenzhou You are correct about the Chinese people." But not about the American diplomats (like Jake Sullivan, John Kirby and Anthony Blinken) whenever they speak about China? What sort of double standards is this? You forgive the Wolf Warrior diplomacy exhibited by US diplomats, but not for Chinese? There is palpable anti-China sentiment growing in the West and you think it's all imagined by China? As for being insulting to Western leaders, I've lost count of the amount of times such insults were hurled at Chinese leaders, yet you don't even take them into consideration when you accuse China of Wolf Warrior Diplomacy.
    2
  12976.  Gregory Jones  Many foreigners often complain Chinese people spit in public, smoke in non-smoking areas, jump queues, disobey traffic rules, jay walk, drive on wrong side of the road, speed through red lights, etc when not all Chinese people are like that. We Chinese feel embarrassed that such bad people represent China overseas, so the government introduce social credit system to discourage such bad behaviour and promote better behaviour instead. This is a meritocratic system where good behaviour is rewarded and bad behaviour penalised. But if such people persist with bad behaviour, until their scores fall to become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisances of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again.
    2
  12977. I think sports shouldn't be politicized.
    2
  12978. China's approach is to build actual physical infrastructure, so that the corrupt officials can't get their hands on the money. The West's approach is to give generous amounts of donations to Africa, which often end up disappearing into pockets.
    2
  12979.  @peorakef  What makes you think liberal democracy is good for ROC or PRC or whatever you wish to call China? Back then, Nobody expected the communist CPC to succeed against the "democratic" KMT, yet the "democratic" KMT still lost the mainland to poorly trained, ill-equipped, heavily outnumbered communists and had to flee to Formosa. And from then on, Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: White Terror (Taiwan) wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Terror_(Taiwan) But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Source: Taiwan Miracle wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_Miracle Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. So isn't Taiwan actually successful because of its authoritarian single-party KMT rule, which jailed and killed political dissidents? How's that any different from mainland China under the CPC?
    2
  12980. China is currently at peace and not at war with any countries (since our last major war in 1979). But USA has been involved in Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, etc, and US's strategy is to cut away the country's heads (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then install their own US puppet governments in place. Now USA is eyeing Syria and the Assad Regime seems to be next on the list.
    2
  12981. Philippines maritime boundary is drawn up in the 1898 Treaty of Paris, which DOES NOT include the South China Sea Islands as within Philippines territory. (Source: Wikipedia: File: Ph boundary in Treaty of Paris 1898)
    2
  12982.  @jeremywolfe6929  Mongolia relinquished control after the Yuan Dynasty.
    2
  12983. +Bruce Leroy China is home to the world's fastest supercomputer, the Sunway TaihuLight 神威·太湖之光 as well as the world's 2nd fastest supercomputer, Tianhe-2 天河-2. During a recent Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance Source: cnet (dot) com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ China is also home to the world's largest high-speed railway network, with more track length that the rest of the world put together. During Chinese New Year, it used to take days of traveling to return to your home province, but thanks to hi-speed rail, the commuting time has been shortened from days to hours.
    2
  12984. The Chinese researchers at the University of Science and Technology of China at Hefei in Anhui province in China have also built a quantum computer of our own that is 24,000 times faster than international counterparts. Chinese scientists have successfully built the world's first quantum computing machine that is claimed to be 24,000 times faster than its international counterparts. youtube /watch?v=Vw1bKuSe49A China hits milestone in developing quantum computer ‘to eclipse all others Source: scmp (dot) com/news/china/policies-politics/article/2092635/china-hits-milestone-developing-quantum-computer
    2
  12985. As for Donald Trump, he clearly did not win the popularity vote, yet why is he elected president? Simple question that's all.
    2
  12986. +Bruce Leroy Pfft. Didn't Westerners themselves invent the concept of Libtard and numerous other insults against Liberals? You really think Americans have "choice" simply because you can vote? You spouted an entire list of "progressive" goals to achieve, but have you truly met any of them sufficiently? I mean, just because its called "progressive" doesn't automatically mean that it is progressing in the right direction. Liberalism encompass a wide range of topics, from democracy, workers rights to LGBT rights, to Feminism and many more topics impossible to cover entirely so I will just touch on a few. Feminism: Feminism in the West has become more like male-hating than true gender equality. Women are encouraged to dominate their men in relationships and in the workplace, sometimes acting downright aggressive to men. Young, beautiful girls are encouraged eat whatever they want, to get tattoos and piercings, to act "unladylike", to grow fat and unattractive, and yet, the Western media will tell them that men will desire them and find them attractive. If they are attracted by your looks, then they are "shallow" people and they don't deserve you. Are you sure that's what you want for society? LGBT rights: Homosexual marriage is encouraged and same-sex couples can adopt children. Is this really considered progressive? By destroying the basic family unit (man + woman + any kids they had together) many social problems have been created. What happens to those adopted kids at school if they get bullied/made fun of? How will they grow up with such a different mindset of a family? Workers Right: People are always asking for more rights, more pay, less work, more healthcare, etc. The impact of this is that America becomes less and less productive and competitive overall as a nation. Who pays for all those improvements? In time, your jobs will start flowing to Chinese and other lower paid workers, because of American workers higher salaries and so on. Democracy: (When a court declares a law unconstitutional, the citizens may override that ruling by popular vote) This line cracks me up. So you mean laws made by qualified lawyers can suddenly be overturned because of popular vote? Who is more qualified to pass laws, the judges and lawyers, or the ordinary citizen? Why you people obsessed with "democracy" seem to think that the most popular vote is right? In my opinion, politics should be about doing what's right, NOT what's popular. Sometimes, the popular thing may not be right, and the right thing may not be popular. Democracy is only doing what's popular, not necessarily what's right. Look at Brexit for example. You mean just because the British held a referendum and voted to leave the EU, means that Britain must leave the EU? Why don't you let the politicians decide the future of the country, instead of leaving it in the hands of the common people? Do the common people know enough about politics to make such important decisions regarding the country's future? My final statement is simply stating your parties entire list of goals, doesn't automatically mean that it will accomplish anything. Have you people achieved any of the goals you set out to do?
    2
  12987.  The Snurger  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    2
  12988.  Ed Gein  North Korea has actually seen much change and development, over the last few decades. The one major obstacle that's holding back NK's development is the crippling sanctions that USA slapped on the DPRK.
    2
  12989. One possibility reason is that the U.S is gradually losing its competitive edge and does not know how to react to China's rise, so it's response is to destroy all its competitors.
    2
  12990.  @ltw5667  Hong Kong apartments can be quite claustrophobic I agree.
    2
  12991.  @blitz12399  According to the New York Times, America's homelessness crisis is getting worse and the number of homeless people living outside shelters is increasing. Some of them live in encampments which have propped up in parks and other public spaces across major cities.
    2
  12992.  @blitz12399  I've watched a documentary about Homeless in America, and there are American citizens (not migrants) having to sleep in a car because they have been evicted due to being unable to afford rent with the rising cost of living, gas prices, etc.
    2
  12993.  @blitz12399  Have you actually visited one of those old Soviet era apartments yourself and seen what life is like living there? While not luxurious, it met the housing needs of many Russians and in some cases, it can forge a sense of community among residents. If not, there are also modern Russian buildings built recently and equipped with many modern amenities.
    2
  12994.  @blitz12399  That 0.1% only happens to be the homeless people recorded at homeless shelters, still there are homeless people that live outside the shelters, in various encampments and public spaces, (or in a car, like in that homeless documentary I watched) and these numbers are not well-documented. And what do you mean by "Nice try?" At least in Russia, the state is still obliged to give permanent shelter for free to anybody who needs better living conditions or has no permanent registration. This is because the right to shelter is still included in the constitution.
    2
  12995.  @blitz12399  650,000 out of a total population of 333 million is more than 0.1%. Seems like you've gotten your own estimation wrong in the first place, then how can you keep on saying "Nice try" when you're not even accurate in your figures? Had you said 0.2% then of course it would include those in homeless encampments and other living conditions. But you've clearly said 0.1% not 0.2%.
    2
  12996.  @blitz12399  Those old-Soviet style buildings may be old and dilapidated, but at least it's a roof over their heads and it surely beats living out in the streets or a car like the homeless in the United States. As for standard of living, the cost of living in Russia is certainly cheaper than living in the U.S, especially given the rising food and gas prices in the latter.
    2
  12997. Americans are patriotic and proud of their country. Likewise, why can't Chinese be nationalistic and proud of our own country as well? Nationalism is what binds a country together, and even USA has patriotic slogans like "America first!", "Make America Great Again!" and "God Bless the United States of America!". If I were American, my chest would probably swell with pride upon hearing those slogans. But I'm not American, and China has made great progress to turn from 3rd world, dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, into a 1st world, economic power, protected by world's largest land army (People's Liberation Army) and able to influence global politics. Why can't Chinese be proud of our achievements? Its not easy to transform a poor country into an economic power, yet instead of being recognized for our achievements, the West constantly mocks China because our political system is different from theirs?
    2
  12998. +wendef ung You said earlier that "China is expanding its military base world wide" but China only has a single overseas base in Djibouti, whereas USA has over 400 military bases in Okinawa Japan, South Korea, Philippines, etc. so isn't USA the bigger threat than China? Wikipedia: List of countries with overseas military bases wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_overseas_military_bases
    2
  12999.  @nemod.8310  China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having the world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    2
  13000.  @MarkYeung1  Well, why didn't a crowded world class city like Hong Kong vaccinate their elderly then? Contrary to popular world opinion, China doesn't have a vaccine mandate (unlike the truckers in Canada for example). And now that it's too late to start vaccinating the elderly, the best course of action is lockdown to prevent more unnecessary deaths.
    2
  13001.  @MarkYeung1  It's too late, cases are already spreading in Shanghai and with only 62% elderly vaccinated, lockdown is the best course of action. The house is on fire, you don't start thinking about how to prevent the fire, you'll have to first put out the fire. So when it happens to a world class crowded city like Hong Kong, it's just embarrassing, but when it happens to Shanghai, it's unacceptable? Why the seemingly double standards here?
    2
  13002.  @MarkYeung1  So you're admitting that Canada has taken authoritarian measures like imposing a vaccine mandate, whereas in mainland China there's no vaccine mandate? Yet why do Westerners claim that they have freedoms over Chinese when they have such mandates?
    2
  13003.  @MarkYeung1  You said it's unacceptable for a crowded, world class city like Shanghai, yet for Hong Kong, you just said it's embarrassing, that's all, so why the difference in treatment between Shanghai and and Hong Kong?
    2
  13004.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou When it comes to protecting the lives citizens during a health crisis, government need to be decisive." Sadly, there are still around 100 cases of Canadians dying from Covid, right now even as we speak, whereas China take decisive steps to save as many lives as possible through lockdown.
    2
  13005.  @WatchingMindlesslySince2006  Turns out it was all just a big misunderstanding. In a tweet, the Chinese embassy in Paris clarified that the incidents of patients being left to die after being abandoned by care workers occurred in Spain, not France. 北京随即解释说是这是“误解”，并否认所有“对法国抗击疫情的负面评论”。面对法国舆论的巨大批评，中国大使馆也出面解释说，文章实际上是针对西班牙的，因为三月底，西班牙部队在类似的养老部门里发现了死亡例子。但是因为文章使用了法国专门护理不能自理的老人机构的缩写词“ 老人院（Ehpad）”，这一缩写很少在法国以外使用，因此，被认为是指发生在法国养老院里，其中包括法国外长。 最后，法国外长表示，北京的反应“消除了所有的误解，并重申了在新的多边主义中合作的必要性”。 Translation: Beijing immediately explained that it was a "misunderstanding" and denied all "negative comments about France's fight against the epidemic." In the face of huge criticism from French public opinion, the Chinese embassy also came forward to explain that the article was actually aimed at Spain, because at the end of March, Spanish troops found examples of deaths in similar pension departments. However, because the article uses the French acronym "Ehpad", a French acronym for specialized care for the elderly who cannot take care of themselves, this acronym is rarely used outside of France, so it is considered to refer to the occurrence in French nursing homes, including the French foreign minister. In the end, the French foreign minister said that Beijing's response "dispelled all misunderstandings and reaffirmed the need for cooperation in the new multilateralism".
    2
  13006.  @WatchingMindlesslySince2006  Just because Chinese embassy used a French acronym EHPAD doesn't necessarily mean China was referring to France. The Chinese Embassy even issued a statement explaining the use of this acronym by French media to refer to medical nursing homes in other countries. Here it is: 另外，我馆文章中关于“养老院”的描述引自媒体对其他欧洲国家的报道，并不涉及法国。法国媒体也广为使用“EHPAD”指各国医疗养老院。比如，《巴黎人报》4月18日在推特上就曾使用，称“新冠肺炎疫情中，加拿大一家EHPAD被护理人员抛弃”。该词也被LCI等多家媒体使用。 Translation: In addition, the description of the "nursing home" in the article of our library is quoted from the media reports on other European countries, and does not involve France. French media also widely use "EHPAD" to refer to medical nursing homes in various countries. For example, Le Parisien used it on Twitter on April 18, saying that "an EHPAD in Canada was abandoned by paramedics during the new crown pneumonia epidemic." The term is also used by several media outlets such as LCI.
    2
  13007.  @MarkYeung1  You seem to have forgotten that many vaccines require at least 2 doses,* which have to be taken 21 days apart for the Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine, and 28 days apart for the Moderna/Spikevax vaccine and Sinovac. Please be informed yourself.
    2
  13008.  @MarkYeung1  China had the Covid-19 situation largely under control, that's why many elderly in China do not see the need to vaccinate. Wheres in Canada, the virus is allowed to spread uncontrollably (sadly average of 100 Canadians are dying to Covid every day) that's why elderly see the need to vaccinate.
    2
  13009.  @MarkYeung1  The fact that it takes 2 doses spread out over 21/28 days and a further 2 weeks to become fully vaccinated, means that it's currently too late to start vaccinating the elderly population in Shanghai, now that cases are surging. The priority should be to lower the number of cases, and that's why ultimately, lockdown is still necessary for Shanghai. Once the situation is under control, then vaccinating the elderly can be carried out, since it's a tedious and time-consuming process spanning at least a month or more.
    2
  13010.  @kammonkam4905  I just gave the truckers protesting against vaccine mandates as an example of Canadian vaccine mandates that's all, and that some of the truckers bank accounts were purportedly frozen. But China doesn't have a vaccine mandate that's why some elderly in China are not vaccinated.
    2
  13011.  @MarkYeung1  Are you sure you got vaccinated when you didn't even know that it takes 21-28 days to get 2 doses to get fully vaccinated? And now you're saying that Shanghai people should have gotten vaccinated 4 to 5 weeks earlier, that means it takes at least a month to get sufficient levels of antibodies, so why are you telling me to get informed when you yourself are apparently uninformed?
    2
  13012.  @TheNewGreenIsBlue  "Did Jurassic Park teach us NOTHING! lol." Jurassic Park is a work of fiction for crying out loud, what has fiction got to do with reality?
    2
  13013.  @TheNewGreenIsBlue  Works of fiction like Jurassic Park_ had their authors deliberately exaggerate the negative effects of humanity's actions primarily for entertainment purposes and to attract readership of their books. But it doesn't necessarily mean that what happens in the book is reflective of reality.
    2
  13014. China donated 1,000 ventilators to New York, when even their own government is not helping NYC, the epicentre in USA.
    2
  13015. The United States separated parents from their kids by deporting more than half a million parents who were illegal immigrants since 2009 according to Washington Post. Source: The U.S. has deported more than half a million parents since 2009. washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/09/21/this-is-what-would-happen-to-the-children-of-11-million-illegal-immigrants-if-president-trump-deported-them/
    2
  13016.  @rontsang4308  Chinese ambassadors who "stand up to them and make sure you don’t allow them the last word" are labelled as "Wolf Warriors" by the Western MSM, even though they are just doing what American diplomats like Jake Sullivan and Anthony Blinken have been doing all along towards China.
    2
  13017.  @rontsang4308  Speaking to Americans on our behalf, means our ambassador has to present China's nuanced viewpoint that respects all involved parties. China's stance is about peaceful cooperation and promoting mutual prosperity, and China won't be able to achieve this if our ambassadors follow in the footsteps of "standing up to them". That's American-style diplomacy, representing America's aggressive stance of putting American interests ahead of others. But that's not the stance that China wants to adopt for ourselves, so China's ambassador needs to phrase his remarks carefully to reflect our stance.
    2
  13018. This hubris by American MSM journalists is also evident in American diplomats like Jake Sullivan's and Anthony Blinken's condescending attitude towards China during meetings.
    2
  13019. +Ji-Hoon Moon President Trump has stated many times publicly, that China's cooperation is essential to containing the North Korean missile threat. So it is unlike that USA would want antagonize trade relations with China, with the risk of losing China's support for North Korean denuclearization.
    2
  13020. +Ji-Hoon Moon President Trump promised to label China currency manipulator, but after Maralargo Meeting between President Trump and President Xi Jinping, Trump did not label China a currency manipulator after coming to an agreement. What do you have against communism? Chinese government is no longer Marxist, and is considered to be more capitalist than Western nations. The government is not perfect, but it has done much by helping modernize China through its policies. If Chinese people can surivive on 10 dollars a day, then what's wrong with using that as the poverty line basis in China? Nobody every said every country should follow Western democracy or Western definition of poverty.
    2
  13021. Ji-Hoon Moon Why assume I in America and immersed American culture? Modern China was built by the sweat, blood, toil and sacrifice of Chinese people through invasion, famine, war and revolutions, to turn China from dirt poor country, into modern economic power. It wasn't easy and there were many failures and mistakes, but the government pulled China through and turned China into force to be reckoned with. Few decades ago, nobody thought communist China would ever succeed and play important role in global affairs, but we did. Who are you to look down Chinese people's efforts and belittle our achievements? We have shown that democracy not always needed to succeed as nation.
    2
  13022.  @MarkYeung1  Because it's a "loophole" under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty that nuclear power submarines aren't banned. So a non-nuclear country like Australia can potentially reverse-engineer the ability to acquire weapons-grade nuclear material through nuclear submarines. It's kinda like when Hong Kong government proposed the Hong Kong Extradition Bill to cover up the "loophole" that allowed a Hong Kong man to murder his pregnant girlfriend in Taiwan and stuff her body in a suitcase, while he flew back to Hong Kong and evaded extradition by Taiwan authorities.
    2
  13023.  @MarkYeung1  That's because Annex I of Hong Kong Basic Law states that the Hong Kong Election Committee shall be composed of 1,500 members, so Beijing is only acting in accordance with Hong Kong Basic Law. Before this, the Hong Kong people did not get to even vote, while Hong Kong was still a British colony for 150 years.
    2
  13024.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "For those who voted, there was only one candidate approved by China. " That's in accordance to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條) which states: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." Therefore, Beijing (aka Central People's Government) reserves the right to appoint the Hong Kong Chief Executive as per Article 45.
    2
  13025.  @MarkYeung1  The Taiwan youth seems to have forgotten that previously Taiwan had been ruled by the authoritarian, single-party Kuomintang (Guomindang) during which Taiwan experienced its greatest economic prosperity. However, once democracy was introduced to the island in the 1990s, Taiwan's economy stagnated, wages became stagnant, cost of living is rising, youth unemployment is rising, then why did Taiwan adopt democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    2
  13026.  @fightback397  "Just ask commom Australians if they really feel threatened by the " yellow peril " or " the communist threat " ." According to the Sydney Morning Herald, Asian-Australians have reported almost 400 racist attacks since the beginning of the pandemic, according to a survey. Osmond Chiu, a fellow at independent progressive thinktank Per Capita, authored the survey in collaboration with the Asian Australian Alliance and Being Asian Australian. "There definitely has been an increase," he said, noting that compared to similar data from the United States, there have been a higher proportion of racist incidents against Asian-Australians than Asian-Americans. The survey has so far documented 386 racist incidents, including abuse, physical intimidation and spitting. The survey also revealed that roughly 90% of racist incidents were not being reported to police and the vast majority were perpetrated by strangers in public places.
    2
  13027.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "no more democracy or freedom now in Hong Kong." Previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong had been ruled by authoritarian British colonial rule during which the people of Hong Kong had no democracy and virtually no elections were held in Hong Kong while it was a British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    2
  13028.  @jp95js  The International Court of Justice DID NOT RULE in the South China Sea ruling. The so-called "Hague Court" that did the ruling was the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which itself isn't an official UN agency, it only shares the same office space as the ICJ in the Hague, but the two organizations are unrelated. So why are you bringing up the ICJ when it was the PCA that made the South China Sea ruling? What gave you the impression that it was the ICJ that did the ruling?
    2
  13029.  @jp95js  What's this "U.N arbitration court" you are talking about? The Permanent Court of Arbitration is not an UN agency it only rents space in the same building as the UN’s International Court of Justice, but the two organisations are not related. Source: Permanent Court of Arbitration is not a United Nations agency https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Permanent_Court_of_Arbitration So why are you bringing up the International Court of Justice when it was the Permanent Court of Arbitration (a non-UN agency) that did the ruling? What gave you the impression that it was the ICJ? Since the ruling was conducted by non-UN agency, then China reserves the right not to adhere to its ruling.
    2
  13030.  @jp95js  "神州 Shenzhou Five years ago, Beijing blithely dismissed an international tribunal landmark ruling..." What international tribunal? The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is not a UN-agency it only rents space in the same building as the UN’s International Court of Justice (ICJ), but the two organisations are not related. So why'd you bring up the ICJ for, when it was a non-UN agency like PCA that did the ruling? So since the ruling was conducted by non-UN agency, then China reserves the right not to adhere to its ruling. You said: "There is no doubt that Freedom Of Excises/sailing rights by those navies will continue and there is nothing the PLA can do to stop it." The USA can only temporarily send their warships to the South China Sea, whereas China is building permanent islands on the South China Sea. The US warships can't stay in the South China Sea permanently, eventually they'll have to eventually return to their homebase to refuel, whereas China is constructing permanent islands and fortifying them in the South China Sea. Imagine after 10 years time, China would have completed 10 years of island building and fortifications in the South China Sea, whereas the USA would have conducted 10 years of Freedom of Navigation exercises, but nothing tangible to show for all their years of patrol.
    2
  13031.  @jp95js  "神州 Shenzhou Five years ago, Beijing blithely dismissed an international tribunal landmark ruling..." What international tribunal? The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is not a UN-agency it only rents space in the same building as the UN’s International Court of Justice (ICJ), but the two organisations are not related. So why'd you bring up the ICJ for, when it was a non-UN agency like PCA that did the ruling? So since the ruling was conducted by non-UN agency, then China reserves the right not to adhere to its ruling. You said: "There is no doubt that Freedom Of Excises/sailing rights by those navies will continue and there is nothing the PLA can do to stop it." The USA can only temporarily send their warships to the South China Sea, whereas China is building permanent islands on the South China Sea. The US warships can't stay in the South China Sea permanently, eventually they'll have to eventually return to their homebase to refuel, whereas China is constructing permanent islands and fortifying them in the South China Sea. Imagine after 10 years time, China would have completed 10 years of island building and fortifications in the South China Sea, whereas the USA would have conducted 10 years of Freedom of Navigation exercises, but nothing tangible to show for all their years of patrol.
    2
  13032.  @jp95js  So you've been previously involved in some bar fights yourself, but again what did it resolve? How does physical violence help to resolve anything? Why not use words to talk things over like adults, rather than using fists to resolve issues? Physical violence clearly doesn't resolve anything, yet you seem to advocate violence against people who bring up China's positive achievements? Since you have admitted that you haven't, nor will you ever go to the People's Republic of China, then how can you claim to know what life is really like here for yourself, when you've never been? What gave you such a negative impression of a place in which you never actually set foot in? (Just like earlier, why did you mention the International Court of Justice when it was non-UN agency like Permanent Court of Arbitration that conducted the South China Sea ruling? What made you think it was the ICJ instead of the PCA?) If you claim that the Communist Party of China covered up the coronavirus, then why did China report to the World Health Organization of a "mysterious pneumonia" like illness on 31st Dec 2019? By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. So what makes you claim that China covered up the virus? And about allowing the coronavirus to be exported out of China, the Chinese government had lockdown Wuhan so why would the government do that if they wanted to allow the coronavirus to be exported? Why lockdown Wuhan if that was their purpose all along?
    2
  13033.  @jp95js  Because at that time, World Health Organizations had not designated Covid19 as a pandemic, since the number of cases at that time were few. But China did not claim other countries were "racist" for doing so, where did you get such information from? And China clearly lockdown Wuhan and except for chartered flights, no international passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since its lockdown on January 23, according to Hubei Airport Group Company. So you haven't actually set foot in mainland China and seen what life is like here for yourself, then how can you claim to know what happens in side China when you've never been? You already harbor negative opinions about a country that you never set foot into, then who has been feeding you such negative opinion about a country that you've never been? I can show you a short 2 min clip of 11 cities in China. Beautiful Night View of China 2016 11 cities in 2 minutes youtu.be/WyH7Af4Dt7E You said: "I have seen a Vid on Youtube of some silly White Foreigner who got attacked in a bar by a crowd of Chinese after he said things about the CCP they didn't like." Could you link me this video on YouTube of a Caucasian expat getting attacked in a bar by a crowd of Chinese? And again, how does physical violence resolve conflicts? Did your bar fight in J Bay South Africa help to resolve anything at all?
    2
  13034.  @jp95js  Which serpentza video are you referring to? So you've seen a video of serpentza getting attacked in a bar by a crowd of Chinese, then can you link me that video in which he got attacked? And it's similar how you described your personal experience in a bar fight in J Bay South Africa, against a Caucasian South African man, when serpentza himself is a Caucasian South African man. You said: "And from February last year= China' Foreign Ministry accuses USA of 'racism against Chinese Nationals, also manufacturing and spreading panic' with coronavirus travel ban, evacuations" I found one Reuters article entitled: China accuses U.S. of racial discrimination over visa cancellations dating to September 10, 2020 (updated to one year ago) It says: China on Thursday accused the United States of political persecution and racial discrimination and said it reserves the right for further reaction, after Washington said it had revoked the visas of more than 1,000 Chinese students and researchers it had deemed security risks. But what has this article even got to do with the coronavirus? It was the USA revoking Chinese students VISAs.
    2
  13035.  @jp95js  "神州 Shenzhou I remember the Vid of the bashing was on an ADV podcast." Hold on a minute. You're now claiming that it's a podcast? But earlier you said (and I quote your earlier words): "I have seen a Vid on Youtube of some silly White Foreigner who got attacked in a bar by a crowd of Chinese after he said things about the CCP they didn't like." but now you're claiming it's just some podcast you heard from ADV? Since it's a podcast then does it show actual footage of serpentza getting attacked in a bar by a crowd of Chinese? Or is it perhaps just some story that serpentza made up to malign Chinese?
    2
  13036.  @jp95js  So you're claiming an ADV podcast showed a Caucasian guy getting attacked by a crowd of Chinese? Does that podcast have actual footage of that event, or isn't it possible that serpentza cooked up that story to malign Chinese people?
    2
  13037.  @jp95js  Let me get this straight, first you claimed you saw a vid on YouTube of "some silly White Foreigner" who got attacked in a bar by a crowd of Chinese. Next, you claimed: "It's in a SerpentZA Vid" but then you claim you remember "the Vid of the bashing was on an ADV podcast." Now you're claiming "It came off WeChat or something..." well why do you keep on changing your sources? You stated that you saw a Vid on YouTube, then why can't you link me the actual footage of serpentza getting attacked by a crowd of Chinese, which was exactly what you claimed earlier?
    2
  13038. Didn't President Trump promise to bring coal power back to America, and he even withdrew USA from the 2017 Paris Climate Accord, so that USA doesn't have to control its CO2 emissions?
    2
  13039. That adds a whole new meaning to being "mind-blown".
    2
  13040. There's clearly insufficient evidence of an ongoing genocide in Xinjiang. Even the International Criminal Court (ICC) has asked for more evidence before it will be willing to open an investigation into claims of genocide against Uighur people by China. Source: The Guardian: ICC asks for more evidence on Uighur genocide claims
    2
  13041.  @violatedmonkey  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Which country is the real threat to global peace and stability here?
    2
  13042. Herr Wolf What rubbish are you talking about? What about European genocide of Native Americans and importing slaves from Africa to work for them? Why don't you tell all non-native Americans get out of the Americas and return those lands to the natives then? Japan invaded Korea and occupied it for 50 years, all the while discouraging Korean language and culture, while promoting Japanese culture. During WW2 Japan also invaded Singapore and Philippines and forced the locals to sing Japanese national anthem and promote the study of Japanese languages. So in what way do you think America and Japan didn't violently oppress people and erase their cultures?
    2
  13043. TalesOfGod What fabrication are you talking about? I used Western sources to support my claims so why are you dismissing them as communist party fabrication altogether? In 1951, Tibetan government signed an agreement (Seventeen Point Agreement) acknowledging China's sovereignty over Tibet, so what on earth makes you people think that Tibet is not legal part of China? Just because China is communist automatically means China is wrong here? Are you implying that every country has to follow Western democracy is that what you are trying to say?
    2
  13044.  @MarkYeung1 "Russia also has rich bosses." Yet Russians aren't the ones going on strike. In fact, Russia has become Europe's largest economy and the fifth in the world in terms of purchasing power parity.
    2
  13045.    When the Japanese invaded Manchuria in 1931, the Nationalist KMT leader Chiang kai-shek was reluctant to face them, instead he continued to purge communists (our own fellow Chinese) instead of meeting the Japanese invaders. Until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng had to kidnap Chiang and force him to ally with the communists against the Japanese. This incident was later known as the Xi'an Incident (西安事变) wikipedia.org/wiki/Xi%27an_Incident#Negotiations_and_release Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was thanks to communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release and to form a united front against the Japanese.
    2
  13046.  @merrick6195  What makes you think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists chinadaily.com.cn/a/201810/04/WS5bb5bab5a310eff303280b2e.html Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all. I think many Westerners are the ones perceiving Chinese as less than human. Anti-China sentiment is growing in the West, racially-motivated attacks against people of Asian descent are on the rise, and people of Asian descent are getting shot and killed, yet authorities are reluctant to label it as a hate crime.
    2
  13047.  @merrick6195  I find it very ironic that on one hand, you want Chinese people to be allowed to express our views freely, yet on the other hand, you call Cyrus a traitor to democracy, for expressing a view that differs from yours. Isn't that rather "un-democratic" of you? Does anyone else see the sheer irony here?
    2
  13048.  @dinesh50448  Source: No, the coronavirus is not a biological weapon washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/04/26/no-coronavirus-is-not-biological-weapon/
    2
  13049.  @merrick6195  You said: "The chinese are raised to believe that as long as its for the greater good of the bigger population it is ok to sacrifice their human rignts." Firstly, this belief has proven to be true and has actually manifested in reality, through China's lockdown of Wuhan, sacrificing human rights to preserve human lives, for the greater good of China. People in Wuhan couldn't go out during lockdown and elsewhere in China, everyone was forced to wear masks against our human rights. But thanks to our temporary sacrifice of human rights, China now has Covid-19 under control, Wuhan's lockdown was eventually lifted and the Wuhanese held a massive pool party to celebrate the end of lockdown. This further reinforces the idea that sacrificing human rights for the greater good actually works, and we in China are now reaping the benefits. …… Secondly, what's wrong with Chinese having our own beliefs different from the West? In the West, people rather sacrifice human lives to preserve human rights, many people refuse to wear masks, many protest against lockdown infringing on human rights, and other such actions. If Westerners believe that human rights are more important than human lives (the greater good) then that's your beliefs, why can't Chinese have our own beliefs?
    2
  13050.  @merrick6195  About the re-education centres, the Muslims in China are Chinese citizens by birth (it says so on their Resident Identity Card) and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (national language of China) Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth (it says so on their ID) and they learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America. Terrorism is caused by joblessness, poor education and people harboring resentment. Many terrorist attacks happen while the terrorist is in the terminal stage, once the extremist has reached the end of his/her rope and starts shooting and killing people. By then, it's far too late, people have already been killed, so why not attempt to root out the problem of terrorism in the initial stages? If you study all terrorist behaviour data, then you can spot the conditions for extremism and identify the high risk potential terrorists groups, and hopefully prevent them from deteriorating further into extremism. Just like shootings by gunman, many neighbours or relatives know about the suspects radicalism, but choose to do nothing until the gunman starts shooting and killing people, which by then, it's already too late. By educating those potential high risk groups, future tragedy could potentially be averted, lives could be preserved and the potential extremist can rejoin as a productive member of society. It's really reinforces the belief of sacrificing human rights to preserve human lives, for the greater good of China, so why can't China teach our own people our own policies?
    2
  13051.  @merrick6195  If you want to talk about prison populations then it's actually America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate
    2
  13052.  @merrick6195  "神州 Shenzhou no. Because if you believe in equality, you wouldn't be supporting dictatorship." Equality has many different definitions, just like Dictatorship has many. In China, there is "dictatorship of the proletariat". where the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit. Whereas in USA, the U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit, waging wars in the Middle East to control the oil and not caring as the bottom 50% of lower income Americans become poorer through the decades. Rich people control everything in the USA and get away with growing inequality, whereas in China, even the rich have to bow down to the government's authority if they overstep their boundaries. This is what is meant by equality and dictatorship, nothing is being done about growing inequality in the USA, while something is being done to lift poor people out of poverty in China to close the income gap. And the point is that don't you find your actions ironic, where you want to promote Chinese speaking freely, yet you condemn Cyrus simply for voicing his opinion? One that happens to differ from yours? You're literally being a dictator yourself by trying to impose your views onto Cyrus Janssen, yet you're calling him a traitor to democracy and supporting dictatorship? How much more obvious should the irony be for you to see? …… You said: "Anyone who respects human rights would not stand watching other people treated as animals." Why don't Westerners start at home, by treating people of Asian descent with respect, instead of being less than human? Look at the rising racially-motivated attacks against people of Asian descent, and you want to lecture China on how not to treat people like animals? Simple basic decency is lacking, yet you want to talk about higher orders of treatment?
    2
  13053.  @merrick6195  "神州 Shenzhou First, mask wearing could be promoted as it is a public health measure. And it does not harm the intrinsic human rights." So why are many Westerners ever so reluctant to wear masks, claiming that it infringes on their basic human rights? Asian society has a culture of mask-wearing, something that was missing in the West until quite recently. In the West, wearing a mask in public is seen as selfish, because you appear to be protecting yourself from other people's infection. This can be seen in the way many Westerners spit on people who wear masks or tried to pull them off. Whereas in Asian culture, mask-wearing is seen as being polite, that you are trying to prevent others from catching your flu. This supports the belief of sacrificing human rights to preserve human lives for the greater good. And if you support mask-wearing, then you are reinforcing this idea of sacrificing human rights for the greater good, isn't it? …… You said: "How can this be compared to forcing people to stay home when they have a low risk of spreading the infection?" Because while they may not spread the infection themselves, the infection might spread to them, if they go out and mass gather in public (especially without a mask). All it takes is just one single infected person among a group of uninfected person for Covid-19 to spread, so why allow the group of people gather in the first place? Again, this supports the belief about sacrificing human rights to preserve human lives. By staying at home, you are helping the greater good of society at the cost of your rights.
    2
  13054.  @merrick6195  You said: "They are not being educated, they are forced to stay in the centre and they cannot communicate with the outside world. They cannot leave the centre until they are deemed 'well-educated.'" Xinjiang's re-education centers are boarding schools, where students can take the weekends off to visit their homes and family members, who said they aren't allowed to leave? Chartered buses are available every weekend to take students back to their home village, even BBC footage shows students queueing up to board buses, yet you claim they aren't allowed to leave? Which concentration camp allows its inmates to be go home during the weekends, you tell me? Video: youtu.be/OrfBIH8d9Wc?t=181
    2
  13055.  @merrick6195  About China's leader for life, China has hatched many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's political system. Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US political system.
    2
  13056.  @jacwi8719  Ambassadors from 50 countries have voiced support to China's position on Xinjiang issues. Video:youtu.be/lhwBnn-Qm-Q Ambassadors from 50 countries to the UN at Geneva (UNOG) have co-signed a letter to the president of the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) and the High Commissioner for Human Rights to voice their support for China's position on issues related to its Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.
    2
  13057.  @dinesh50448  President Xi Jinping has shown to be a strong and competent leader, capable of governing our country of 1.4 billion people (certainly no easy feat), guiding China through the Covid-19 situation and emerging successfully after it. Then why can't we leave President Xi at the helm to continue charting China's future? China has many long term goals, for example the Belt and Road Initiative proposed by President Xi, that will take many decades (possibly centuries) to complete, and if successful, would change the world drastically from today. By abolishing presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. In the USA, where US Presidents step down after 4-8 years because of term limits, they can't plan 10-years ahead, because there is no guarantee that their plans will remain. Look at Trump cancelling Obama's Trans Pacific Partnership deal (which experts believe would greatly USA if it had proceeded with it) it shows that you can't truly make long term plans with term limits unlike China can. And look at India's current leader Narendra Modi, burying his head in the sand amidst the escalating out-of-control Covid-19 situation in India. Yet there's nary a protest against Modi for his mishandling of Covid-19, doesn't that imply majority of Indians bow down to Modi?
    2
  13058.  @valuedcustomer8922  USA has 4% of the world's population, but 25% of the world's Covid-19 cases, I think these expats would probably prefer living outside of the USA at the moment.
    2
  13059. We should be speaking out against Zionism itself, but not against the Jewish people. Because not all Jews are Zionists and not all Zionists are Jews.
    2
  13060. Why not build brand new apartments for the homeless in UK to live in then? Look at 1:52 of the video, and you can see the government building resettlement villages to house these people, instead of making them climb the ladder to reach their high altitude village in the mountains. I'm sure British government has the funds to built new houses too right?
    2
  13061.  @Cosmo1093  Dr Peter Forster from, a geneticist Cambridge University has identified 3 Covid-19 strains (A, B, C) Type-A is believed to have jumped from bats to humans (animal-to-human transmission) and Type-B is mutated from Type-A and found predominantly in China while Type-C is mutated from Type-B and found predominantly outside China, in places like Singapore. Video: No proof that Covid-19 originated in Wuhan: Peter Forster youtu.be/AQQf2yoymu0 The interesting thing is that the Europe and America suffer predominantly from Type-A virus (animal-to-human transmission) and Type-A is predominantly found outside East Asia, that is, in Europeans and Americans.
    2
  13062.  @Cosmo1093  Did I ever said that Europe/Italy is the origin? Then how could I have contradicted myself? Whereas you clearly said the virus spread from China -> Italy -> New York, and now you quoted a source saying China spread to Americans? And according to your 2nd source, nothing is confirmed yet more questions are raised for example, The Cambridge study also raised some new questions. The first strain isolated and reported by Chinese scientists was actually younger than the original type that caused the outbreak. Why the US had more strains genetically closer to a bat virus than Wuhan has prompted heated debates in the research community.
    2
  13063.  Joanne Lowrey  The bat soup coronavirus origins myth have debunked and Wuhan Seafood Market has been debunked of selling snakes, rats, bats, dogs and cats. Source: Are there really dogs, snakes, rats and bats for sale at the Wuhan market where coronavirus originated? observers.france24.com/en/20200204-china-debunked-coronavirus-dogs-snakes-rats-bats-wuhan-market-indonesia In short, these videos weren’t filmed in Wuhan or, indeed, anywhere else in China. Instead, they were filmed 3,400 kilometres away in Indonesia.
    2
  13064. +PROF. PARADOX Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, porcelain (precious china) were in great demand by Western civilizations and the Silk Road was set up to bring these goods to the West. Chinese also had the Four Great Inventions 四大发明 which have influenced much of the world. Paper and Printing made the recording and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation less hazardous and more reliable, and Gunpowder has influenced the way modern warfare is fought.
    2
  13065.  Edmund Kemper  Why are you deliberately using the improper name for Covid-19? Look at all those racially-motivated attacks against Asian Americans (Asian Canadians, Asian Australians, Asian Europeans, etc) because American politicians like Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo choose to refer to the virus by it's improper name. Video: Asian Americans face discrimination in wake of the coronavirus youtu.be/t_IyTxRNUYk
    2
  13066. 我们要继续努力，为中国创造更美好的未来。🇨🇳 We must continue our efforts to build a better future for China. 🇨🇳
    2
  13067.  @MarkYeung1  China might suffer in the short-term if Trump was re-elected in 2020. But Trump's re-election would magnify the consequences of Trump on America by another 4 more years, and in that regard, China benefits long-term. Meng was eventually going to be released one day regardless, because she was unlawfully detained by Canada.
    2
  13068. Qing MIAO 老实说，我可怜那些港人当英国的狗还当出了优越感。
    2
  13069.  @少棠丁  "神州 Shenzhou Excuse me are you saying that it's not a sign that shows democracy at it's finest?" How is Taiwan parliament members throwing water balloons and pig guts at 8:20 showing democracy at it's finest? In the mainland, the Communist Party of China makes a plan and proceeds with it.
    2
  13070.  @nihilistlemon1995  "神州 Shenzhou better be a barbarian in a fun place than being in boring China." Why do you think China is boring? China has even launched people into space. On Oct 15, 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person launched into space by the Chinese space program through Shenzhou-5 spacecraft (video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw ) then isn't this exciting?
    2
  13071.  @nihilistlemon1995  You said: "watching China annual military parade and annual communist party anniversary is a great way to knock yourself to sleep." The People's Liberation Army is the world's largest land army, here's the military parade marching with music from a video game. Video: Chinese Army - The Best Hell March 60th Anniversary HD youtu.be/---g-f_I2yQ
    2
  13072.  @Legacy241  If in the future, China can someday surpass the United States as the premier superpower, then why can't China strive to achieve this goal? 50 years ago, nobody thought that China would ever be successful, nor play an important role in global politics, yet look at where China is today. China does not force other countries to borrow from our banks, but if developing countries want a loan, then Chinese banks are happy to offer loans. Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China youtu.be/TtduKDpy4oc China has done much to improve Africa in just decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    2
  13073.  @Legacy241  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    2
  13074.  @Legacy241  Isn't nationalism the glue that binds a country's people together? Over 70 years ago, nobody thought that China would ever be successful or become a world power and play an important role in global politics, yet look at where China is today. Previously under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949), China was dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today under the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    2
  13075.  @Legacy241  In 2016, China launched world's 1st quantum satellite, named Micius, (墨子) into orbit and demonstrated that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere, smashing the previous record held on Earth. Video: China's Quantum satellite achieves 'spooky action' at record distance youtube.com/watch?v=4QlcKuxDGrs Quantum entanglement (in a nutshell) is when two subatomic particles become an "entangled pair", able to influence their quantum states (won't go into detail here) seemingly regardless of the distance involved. One particle could be on the surface of the Earth, and the other on the surface of the Moon, and theoretically, they can still influence each other with no information (known to current science) passing in between them. The longest record for quantum entanglement on Earth is 143 km in at experiment in the Canary Islands. But China has allowed two stations (Delingha and Lijiang station) located 1200 km apart to communicate directly, through our quantum satellite, thus breaking the previous record and showcasing that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere. And as far as I know, this is a world first, and China is the first to launch quantum satellite into space.
    2
  13076.  @Legacy241  Earlier you said "China claims international waters to distrupt local countries" but which international waters are you referring to? Here's a Map of International Waters and which international waters (marked in DARK BLUE) is China allegedly claiming, you tell me? Source: Map of International Waters wikipedia.org/wiki/File:International_waters.svg
    2
  13077.  @Legacy241  Why should mainland China strive to be like Taiwan? Look at mainland China and we are the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    2
  13078. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  13079.  @lorellaldos5263  "it seems unrealistic that China would have developed a chip that is "a thousand times" better than anything else, because it would make everything else ad adsordun. All the chip stocks will crash (but they don't)." Not everything has to do with the chip market. China could have developed such a chip, but simply made it unavailable for sale that's all. All countries reserve the best chips for their own use in, for example, miltary applications, not for selling them on the market.
    2
  13080.  @MarkYeung1  The blackouts were caused by a number of factors, such as the world reopening and the demand for Chinese goods surging and the factories making them need a lot more power. Government policy to make China carbon neutral resulted in slower coal production, and as demand for electricity rose, so did coal prices. But government kept electricity prices cheap, so some coal-fired plants were unwilling to operate at a loss. But the blackout problems have since been resolved by November 2021, and China went for an entire year without importing Australian coal in 2022. Only in 2023 did China resumed importing Australian coal. So if anything, this shows that the blackouts were not linked to Australian coal.
    2
  13081. Why don't people just come visit China and see for themselves whether China is really poor or not? Here is a short 2 min video showcasing 11 of China's cities at night. Video: Beautiful Night View of China 2016 youtube.com/watch?v=G7ZRa-w9xyA
    2
  13082. Western economist are always saying China is on the verge of economic collapse since 1990s. Look at what Western journalists have to say about China's economy 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. Clearly, Western propaganda is biased against China's economic success and has been consistently proven wrong for almost 30 years, so why believe all those Western rumors about China being on the verge of banking collapse? Western economists haven't been right about their predictions of Chinese economy for almost 30 years.
    2
  13083. Here's inside video into Chinese BYD mask factory. Video: China: Factory produces 5 million masks a day in bid to supply shortfall youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw?t=17
    2
  13084.  Bersama Hikmah  This factory in the eastern Chinese city of Rizhao (日照) has been busy pumping out 3,000,000 masks a day. Video: Inside China's Biggest Mask Factory youtu.be/Gc074FxOBA4?t=11
    2
  13085. Follow the rule of law? The Philippine government intentionally grounded a vessel (Sierra Madre) onto the Second Thomas Shoal. China offered to help repair the vessel and get it back to the sea, but Philippines refused. Instead, Philippines sent supply ships to reinforce the decaying hull of the grounded vessel. How's this following the rule of law?
    2
  13086.  Steve Freeman  Tulane virologist Robert Garry, PhD, and a team of researchers analyzed the genome sequence of the novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and found no evidence that the virus was made in a laboratory or otherwise engineered. Video: Virologist explains origins of COVID-19 youtu.be/YLykxJqTBpU
    2
  13087.  Steve Freeman  You claimed Covid-19 is a "bioweapon," then why would President Xi Jinping release this so-called bioweapon" inside Wuhan and kill our own people? Why would President Xi lockdown Wuhan and stopped all international flights coming out of Wuhan, if Covid-19 is a bioweapon that was intended to be spread? Your conspiracy theory of the virus being a bioweapon is clearly full of holes.
    2
  13088. Probably because Saudi Arabia agreed to price their oil in Dollars, and other countries just went along with it.
    2
  13089.  @fclopez1  If that NBA manager can actively promote political agenda in Hong Kong, then why can't China ban the NBA? About the 1 million Uighurs, turns out this figure came from 2 dubious sources, one of which only interviewed 8 Uighurs on what their estimated number of Uighurs in re-education schools were, and then they extrapolated the figure to arrive at the figure of 1 million Uighurs in detention. Source: Claims that China has detained millions of Uyghur Muslims are based largely on two studies. A closer look at these papers reveals US government backing, absurdly shoddy methodologies, and a rapture-ready evangelical researcher named Adrian Zenz. thegrayzone.com/2019/12/21/china-detaining-millions-uyghurs-problems-claims-us-ngo-researcher/ While CHRD states that it interviewed dozens of ethnic Uyghurs in the course of its study, their enormous estimate was ultimately based on interviews with exactly eight Uyghur individuals.
    2
  13090.  @yslee1401  So how is it scripted and choreographed when they're showing what life is really like in China?
    2
  13091.  @everythingandmore5537  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    2
  13092.  @MrPurge11  So where's this post on Weibo made by Peng Shuai on allegedly sexual misconduct? As far as I know, even CNN is unable to independently verify this claim, and Peng Shuai has since released a statement that her allegation of sexual was not true, yet Western MSM aren't convinced and still trying to pursue the matter?
    2
  13093.  @charlieqin1083  "神州 Shenzhou My point is at least 100M Chinese people in the countryside are still living in poverty." But what has that got to with whether or not China is a superpower? The US has people living in poverty too, yet the US is a superpower isn't it?
    2
  13094.  @charlieqin1083  Another thing is that a poor person in China isn't likely to eat sandwich or hamburger. Those are Western food, more likely a poor person in China would eat a bowl of noodles or steamed buns, so is your comparison really appropriate?
    2
  13095.  @NiceOne-f5x  The thing is you're using Western storytelling with the Western version of a dragon. In Western culture, the dragon is the personification of the Seven Sins. The typical dragon sleeps (sloth) on a pile of gold (avarice), abducts the princess (lust), is jealous (envy) and arrogant (pride) and lastly, breathes fire (wrath). A prince slaying the dragon symbolizes a man overcoming the sins. Whereas in Chinese storytelling, the Chinese dragon 🐉is a wise and benevolent spiritual being, a symbol of the Chinese Emperor, bringing fortune and prosperity as well as having control over rain and fostering harmony.
    2
  13096.  @yslee1401  There was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square in June 1989. A Chilean diplomat (Carlos Gallo and his wife) were visiting Beijing at that time and provided eyewitness account of the events unfolding inside Tiananmen Square. He did not observe any mass firing of guns inside the Square, and he said that the troops entering the Square were armed with mostly truncheons and wooden clubs (i.e anti-riot gear).
    2
  13097. Just tune in to CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) media, and they promote ethnic minority culture in China, such as festivals, cuisine, traditional clothing, dancing, singing, playing traditional musical instruments, etc. That's why Chinese media is saying, that China promotes ethnic minority culture.
    2
  13098.  @dingding6745  US sanctions are ineffective. USA sanctions Cuba, North Korea, Venezuela, Iran and numerous others yet they never caved in to the US demands.
    2
  13099. +Panda Bear Humanity has always been evolving through procreation, a completely random splicing of human genes, a chaotic mixing of parents genes, generating billions of traits and attributes, and possibly removing old defects and creating some new defects in the process. But it is a slow and chaotic process, taking billions of years for evolution to produce distinguishing characteristics. But if people have the technology to create humans with perfect immune systems and superhuman capabilities, then what's wrong with that? With CRISPR, we can speed up the process and tailor made the next stage of humanity's development sooner. If the superior humans can outlive the ordinary inferior humans (that's us) then it will be up to them to pass on the human race into the future. Why should us inferior humans be allowed to halt the progress of the superior humans? They have immunity to diseases and superior capabilities, then why can't they be allowed to lead the future of humanity?
    2
  13100. There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, it was only detected by Chinese government. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    2
  13101. The merchants of death are reaping huge profits.
    2
  13102. VR aims to completely isolate the user from real space and immerse him/her in cyberspace. That's the U.S's version of Metaverse. AR aims to combine both cyberspace with real space. That's China's version of Metaverse.
    2
  13103. Putin has already won the war. Will Trump be able to win the peace?
    2
  13104.  @michaelkatz275  Higher tariffs actually hurt the ordinary Americans, because it increase the prices of everyday goods coming into America from China.
    2
  13105. +nitz vision I never said that. Why do you only think stupid and weak countries join Belt and Road Initiative? Many other countries have expressed support for OBOR, such as UK and European countries, as well as ASEAN countries like Singapore. China offers loans out of Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank in order to help out poorer countries with insufficient capital. They can always repay those loans once their economies begin to take off.
    2
  13106. +Global Thinker What is with your weird house and doorstep analogy? China builds roads within our doorstep, not mines and tanks. And it is Indian's troops that are currently stationed in Chinese territory and doorstep, so why can't the government request India withdraw its forces from our territory? India currently does not claim Doklam/Donglong, so how is that considered India's doorstep? Why are you mocking me about sky is green? I provided evidence and links support my claim, but you provide only story about houses and neighbors to this discussion. +Alex Johnson I have stated twice (now thrice) previously, that China does not claim Bhutan as part of China. Why don't you read my posts before posting redundant arguments? President Xi Jinping and President Durterte of Phillipines are settling our disputes peacefully through diplomatic means, so isn't that much better than war of any sort? +ANUPAM RASTOGI It is bilateral issue between Bhutan and China, but is only made more complicated by Indian troops intervention. Why don't India withdraw its troops from Chinese territory first, and observe as neutral party, without taking sides in this bilateral issue? PLA troops may have erroneously entered Indian territory, but they withdrew in the end. Why don't Indian troops in China do the same as well, so we can maintain peace in the region? +Sam D All you do is insult me. When did I insulted you at all? If you have nothing to contribute, then why post at all? You have not even attempt understand Chinese point of view too, and I am explaining it to hopefully prevent war from erupting. +dibyendust Chinese diplomats have engaged with India many times, and even notified India ahead of our activities in the region. One of our requests was for Indians army to withdraw its troops from our territory is all, yet you still claim China has war frenzy? +Aurora Hawk We don't want war, and would prefer peaceful dialogue instead. Better to to talk things out peacefully, instead of resort to violence. It is other people that childishly joke about war and nuclear weapons.
    2
  13107. +Dishant Malhotra I provided reasonable arguments that why I think war between our countries is no joking matter, but these people insult and ridicule me or detract from the issue by bringing up Pakistan and Tibet and so on. India recognizes Pakistan as independent nation (since British India partition) and India also recognizes China's sovereignty over Tibet (since India does not bring up Tibet during United Nations discussions) so why bring these topics up? Some "world platform" this is, when you tube people joke about wars, insult each other, avoid diplomatic channels, tell stories about neighbors and doorsteps and don't provide evidence to back up claims.
    2
  13108. +nn bhardwaj What is purpose of building roads southeast of China? That region already has plenty of roads and railways, so whats the need to connect them further? On the other hand, poorer regions in Western China often lack access to rest of China's prosperity, so why not develop those area instead? Bhutan only claims that territory, but has not yet produced any evidence to support its claim to that Donglong at all. So because Bhutan claim our lands, means we aren't allowed to build roads in our territory? +ANUPAM RASTOGI According to that link, it uses Google Earth to define borders of China, India and Bhutan, but how is Google Earth any more accurate at defining boundaries than Chinese maps? Which country in the world can claim territories using Google Earth as evidence? It is just a program that can be updated by anyone to suit their needs, but who uses it politically in territorial dispute? What is known, is that China occupied Donglong for years, despite Bhutan claiming it. Both our countries have signed agreements in 1988 and 1998 to maintain the status quo. Donglong was under Chinese control before, and now, Donglong remains under Chinese control, so how has the status quo been broken at all? Bhutan never did control Donglong, despite claiming it as part of Bhutan. It should also be noted, that China has explored various diplomatic channels to resolve the issue, but India has so far, shown a non-negotiation attitude. Even in this video, Chinese government strives for peaceful resolution to the issue, but Indian government has not said much. There has been 13 official statements by Chinese government, while Indian government has only 3 official statements, implying a lack of willingness to negotiate. But at least I am glad you appreciate our efforts in other countries. Of course China has an agenda for developing those nations (which country in world doesn't?) but I would like to stress that we are offering infrastructural development to those countries. I am proud of my culture of course, as are many Indian people proud of theirs as well. CPEC issues ultimately boils down to territorial dispute between Pakistan and India. Chinese workers simply are building roads in POK, and China does not claim POK as part of China. When the projects are complete, Chinese workers will vacate the area and leave it to Pakistan (or whoever the real owner is) In my opinion, it would be best if Pakistan and India could mend their issues and settle their differences, so that the whole region can progress smoothly. China only "blocks" India's entry into NSG, possibly because of Pakistan. Like I mentioned above, China and India would possibly face less conflicts, if Pakistan and India were on better terms. Even as UNSC member, we have hardly used veto power and interfered with affairs of other countries. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_veto_power#Most_common_users
    2
  13109. +ANUPAM RASTOGI How is constructing road considered disturbing the status quo? Donglong has always been under China's control, so building roads there suddenly changes the status quo and disturbs the peace? Are you implying Indians sending their troops into Chinese territory is not considered disturbing the peace at all? China also wants peace and tranquility in Donglong, which is why there have been repeated requests for Indian soldiers to withdraw from the area. If India have nothing against CPEC, then Chinese workers should be allowed to develop Pakistan according to terms of CPEC. Why going through POK considered unnecessary aggression? Chinese workers are only there temporary to build roads, and they will withdraw once the project is complete. Chinese government using Indian's non-NPT is merely as an excuse, since Pakistan is also non-NPT, yet the government is supporting Pakistan's entry into NSG, but not India's. The reason therefore, has to be because Pakistan is against India's entry. There are few possible ways for India to enter NSG. 1. Pakistan and India mend relations, until Pakistan gives China the green light to approve India's entry to NSG. 2. India waits until China completes CPEC and therefore doesn't depend too much on Pakistan anymore, and allow India's entry into NSG. 3. India, somehow, shows that it a much more valuable ally to China, than Pakistan. Then Chinese government could possibly approve of India's entry into NSG. This may sound cold and political, but that is how the government works. There is no place for kindness in field of international politics. China has been ever suspicious of India ever since PM Nehru granted asylum to 14th Dalai Lama after he fled from Tibet, which could have drove the government to Pakistan. +Sam D China does not run charity, which is why the government expects to recover the initial investment and to profit from additional interest. Which bank in world, doesn't make money from charging interest for its loans? Sri Lanka and other poor countries probably tried getting loans from IMF or World Bank, but either the loans aren't approved, or the loan amount is insufficient for proper economic development. China is taking a huge risk here, investing in these poorer countries with unstable government countries for long term. So of course, Chinese banks have to cover the risk involved to make the investment worthwhile. How do you know if Sri Lanka would not be able to pay off its loans in future? Once the Maritime Silk Road is complete, it is expected that more ships will call upon Sri Lankan Harbor, and its economy will improve. What is the purpose of these developments at all, if not to improve the country's economy? It may take 20 years or more to pay off the loan, but it will eventually be paid, and the port and infrastructure will belong to their owners. If you want successful examples, then it would be China's investments in Africa. China has built many new roads, railways, schools, hospitals, shopping centers and telecommunication projects. In Algeria, there is 1,000 km freeway built by Chinese workers. In Angola there is Benguela Railway, and in Djibouti there is newly completed railway to replace the old one.
    2
  13110. +Ashish Bagade It was Indian's troops that entered Chinese territory, yet you want PLA get out when Indian government constantly ignore Chinese government requests to withdraw? +dibyendust This thread started by me, so what's wrong with me commenting here? 1. The video itself already reports Chinese government's adherence to peaceful resolution of the situation. At the 0.17 mark, it says "China urged India to immediately pull back the trespassing troops to Indian side of the boundary and call upon them to swiftly address the situation in a proper manner to restore peace and tranquility in border region" If the Indian MEA and spokesperson and Foreign minister made it very clear that it is bilateral issue, then why are Indian troops inteferring with Bhutan-China issue at all? 2. What has China's support of Pakistan and CPEC got to do with Bhutan-China-India issue? If India is so against CPEC roads in POK, then why don't India send its troops over to POK and obstruct road construction there, like what it is doing here in Donglong? 3. How is this a ploy? China is issuing official statements to reduce tensions, but Indian troops are present in Chinese territory. Are you people really so eager for war and for Indian Army and PLA troops to die over this dispute? 4. I have never claimed that every Chinese investment is going to be completely successful. Chinese investments has had some successes and some failures, but the fact remains that Sri Lanka now has a port in its city. Whether the port change ownership, the port is still physically located in Sri Lanka, so how is it a bad thing for Sri Lankan economy? 5. China imports manpower, machinery and cement to Pakistan because Pakistan is unable to produce enough engineers for itself. Pakistan plans to train more engineers to slowly take over CPEC Chinese engineers in future, and is also planning to double its cement production to meet the demands of CPEC. According to your source, Chinese companies are only "renting the land" to develop it by building hydroelectric powerplants there. What has Japan and South China Sea got to do with this issue now? Japan does not claim any of the South China Sea Islands, so what is your point here? The tension was generated when Indian troops entered Chinese territory, so how do you expect tensions to simmer down when it due to presence of Indian troops? The government has made repeated requests for Indian troops to withdraw to promote stability in that region. India has also taken in 14th Dalai Lama, which killed many Chinese during the 1959 uprising. How is the deaths of Indians justified here, but not the deaths of Chinese? +Sam D If you say China controlled by Pakistan, then isn't India controlled by Bhutan by sending its troops into Chinese territory? So World Bank disapprove loans to Pakistan, means Pakistan should forever remain poor and undeveloped? Pakistan has terrorists because its economy is poor and the terrorist ranks are swelling with people unhappy in life. China's approach to terrorism is to build up Pakistan's economy, so that more people find work, instead of joining the terrorists. So after 99 years, the port will still return to Sri Lanka, once the debt is paid off, isn't it? Why are you people so short sighted and only concerned with immediate gains? +ANUPAM RASTOGI Phillipines did not went to ICJ, they went to Permanent Court of Arbitration, which is not an agency of United Nations, so why should China heed the court's decisions? I have so many questions to answer, so who are you to demand answers out of me for simple things you could have researched yourself? Chinese troops still withdrew from Indian territory in the end, but Indian troops haven't withdrew from Chinese territory. If you grant refuge to 14th DL, then you can't expect Chinese government forgive you for that. If India forever provide refuge, the you are bound to antagonize someone along the way. Why don't India provide asylum to US fugitive Edward Snowden who was whistleblower of CIA then, and see if USA doesn't become hostile to you? China was granted permanent membership at UNSC during its creation, and nothing except amendment to UN charter, could ever kick a UNSC permanent off its position. China also one of world's cradle of civilization, with history spanning 5000 years and considered to be one of world's continuous countries still alive today, whereas other civilizations like Rome and Egypt have faded to history. Chinese people also do not want war with India, and the best way to avoid war, is for Indian troops to withdraw from Chinese territory since this is bilateral issue between Bhutan and China. India can always participate as neutral observer, without actively supporting any side in this dispute.
    2
  13111. +Connie F Who on earth uses Google Map as evidence to determine territorial boundaries? You think sovereign territories can be decided by a computer program so easily? Our government has produced maps and treaties supporting our claim, so where is Bhutan evidence to prove that Donglong belongs to them? Using Google Maps? Chinese military installations are there to protect road construction in these regions from terrorists attacks and possible sabotage. The government spends lots of money developing the region and building roads, so of course, PLA troops are assigned to protect our assets in the region. Who knows what India's intentions are regarding Tibet. India appears to outwardly support Chinese sovereignty over Tibet, but when 14th Dalai Lama fled to India after failed uprising in 1959, PM Nehru granted asylum to 14th DL, which makes China suspicious towards Indian intentions. Recently, India also "dangled" 14th DL just out of China's reach in Arunachal Pradesh, as if taunting China, so this makes Chinese even more suspicious India's intents regarding Tibet.
    2
  13112. Pradeep What has genetics of Chinese race got to do with this at all? I don't insult these people, but it is they that attack me personally, instead of my points. I use citations and reasoning to support my points but these people (Indians I assume) mock me and hurl insults. I deal with logic, while these people deal with emotion. If what you say is true, then I could also say that the testosterone in Indians are making them aggressive and violent, instead of logical. Just look at frequency of riots in India for example in this source: Wikipedia: List of riots in India
    2
  13113. ANUPAM RASTOGI Indeed, India is extremely diverse culture, and there are various sub-culture within each culture. Indians speak variety of dialects, over 1600 like you said, but somehow entire country manages communicate points across. China too is similar to that regard, in that we has many different dialects like Cantonese, Min, Teochew, etc, of which Mandarin is only one dialect. Although mutually unintelligible, they all share the same written form of Chinese characters. As two of worlds most populous countries, both India and China have problems relating to population, such feeding our people as well as being overwhelmed by our population. With such large student population, there is fierce competition for top schools and higher education institutions. There is fierce competition for jobs with such large workforce as well as other social issues like housing and so on. Both India and China should work to tackle issues common to both our countries, instead of going to war over territorial issues.
    2
  13114. +Ashish Bagade China is building roads in Donglong in order to provide a second road that allows Indian pilgrims to reach Kailash Mansarovar, and also possibly, Lhasa in Tibet. This road that we are building is expected to connect to Yadong country and even Lhasa. The normal way is extremely congested and uncomfortable, so building a second road will relieve congestion and make pilgrimage possibly less dangerous. These is no way that the roads are being built for express purpose of war. War in Asia will only hurt our growing economies, and India's and China's economies will lose all our progress if such a conflict were to break out in Asia.
    2
  13115. China only halted Indian pilgrims from reaching Lhasa recently because of security concerns of Indian troops invading Chinese territory and obstructing road construction in Donglong. I have never thought Indians dumb or implied that they are not as smart, so why are you putting words in my mouth? You people mock and ridicule me ceaselessly, yet believe I hold the same ill will to you? I have stated very clearly that Chinese people don't want war, and explained and quoted much physical evidence supporting China's claim over Donglong, but you people constantly dismiss my points, without proof of your own. Where is evidence showing Bhutan's claim over Donglong at all? Donglong is difficult terrain, so the roads there snake through the landscape to adapt to terrain. How can you claim that the road is heading towards Bhutan at its current position? Mountainous route will bend according to terrain so until the road is completed can its destination be known. I don't understand this derisive attitude of you people. China doesn't want war, since it will destroy our all the progress we made over the years, so why do you constantly claim China going to war. Why Indian government deliberately send troops into Chinese territory and obstruct road construction, claiming it as a path to war? Are you people really looking forward to a real war happening between our countries?
    2
  13116. Indian government been building roads along our borders for many years already, and even has organization called Border Roads Organization (BRO) specializing in this, so why can't Chinese government built roads within our own territory? (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/govt-gives-more-powers-to-bro-for-roads-along-china-border/articleshow/60147975.cms )
    2
  13117. Look up China's home ownership rate. Today, China is a country of homeowners with more than 90% of households owning homes (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations (Huang et al., 2020). In comparison, the US home ownership rate was 63% in 2017.
    2
  13118. That's a good point. Just how much of America's GDP actually comes from its military buildup and not its economic areas?
    2
  13119.  @rcyadav9746  Why Republic of China not the People's Republic of China? The ROC lost the mainland to the PRC and had to flee to Taiwan, so the ROC lost the right to rule China, while the PRC is recognized by countries all over the world as the real China. Even recently Naura severed its diplomatic relations with Taipei and switched it's recognition of China to Beijing.
    2
  13120.  @pomni8696  Source: German IT watchdog says 'no evidence' of Huawei spying thelocal.de/20181216/german-it-watchdog-says-no-evidence-of-huawei-spying "For such serious decisions like a ban, you need proof," the head of Germany's Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Arne Schönbohm, told news weekly Spiegel, adding that his agency had no such evidence.
    2
  13121.  @ken-yo2hz  Did I said anything about the Chinese Communist Party here in this thread so far?
    2
  13122.  @yawokyere8416  Russia's and China's rise are bringing about a tectonic shift in geopolitics, facilitating a transition towards a more multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (i.e the U.S's). The U.S fears the lost of their hegemonic control, so it does whatever it can to contain other rising powers.
    2
  13123.  @yurig2530  "Shenzhou. Apparently you are not a programmer. There everything starts with 0." But when people lay down rules, they start with Rule No. 1, not Rule No. 0.
    2
  13124.  @yurig2530  But people start counting from 1, not 0. When laying down rules, the first rule starts with Rule No. 1, not Rule No. 0.
    2
  13125.  @jakexgold3879  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Which country do you think is the real threat to global peace and prosperity here.
    2
  13126.  @Rusty571000  About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    2
  13127.    Underground? China has underground hi-speed rail technology far more extensive than USA ever had. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    2
  13128.  @zyp85  Why don't you claim that the U.S should ban the sales of guns then?
    2
  13129.  @kammonkam4905  Even outside of China, women have been historically subjugated in most societies throughout the ancient world. Confucius was born during a chaotic period of Chinese history, with numerous warring states fighting among each other for control, and it's in this background that Confucius developed his philosophies. Lu Xun was highly acclaimed by the Chinese government after 1949, when the People's Republic of China was founded, and Mao Zedong himself was a lifelong admirer of Lu Xun's writing. As a communist, Mao had similarly denounced Confucius as a “regressive pedant and feudal” but if anything, history has shown that Confucian values just can't be separated from China.
    2
  13130.  @kammonkam4905  I'm still waiting for you to give me the name of this 94 year old woman. It's like you can't refute my points, so you start bringing in other topics in your attempts to derail the discussion that's all. I mean the way you describe Chinese as "goons in Hazmat suits" clearly displays your anti-China view, so why pretend that you're not anti-China when you clearly are?
    2
  13131.  @jeffreykalb8810  Over 50 years ago, nobody expected "communist" China to ever succeed or play important role in the world. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1990s, everyone expected China to soon follow. But China survived all expectations of failure and today China is world's 2nd largest economy, the world's manufacturing hub, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd largest military budget and China has strong global presence. So why do Westerners still predict China's economic failure?
    2
  13132.  @TheFivegoodemperors  China actually helped Vietnam gain independence from France. During the First Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons (ranging from artillery guns to rifles and machine-guns), ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help Vietnam fight for independence from France. Source: First Indochina War wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Indochina_War#China From 1950 to 1954, the Chinese government shipped goods, materials, and medicine worth $43 billion (in 2019 dollars) to Vietnam. From 1950 to 1956, the Chinese government had also shipped 155,000 small arms, 58 million rounds of ammunition, 4,630 artillery pieces, 1,080,000 artillery shells, 840,000 hand grenades, 1,400,000 uniforms, 1,200 vehicles, 14,000 tons of food, and 26,000 tons of fuel to Vietnam. Yet, some Vietnamese nationalists seemed to have conveniently forgotten China's aid to Vietnam during their independence and some even claimed that Vietnamese liberated themselves from France all by themselves.
    2
  13133. Me too. Its very realistic
    2
  13134. A multi-polar world will be dominated by multiple voices, rather than the current uni-polar world dominated by a single voice, namely the U.S's and it's "allies."
    2
  13135.  @paul-hh9oc  Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, clothing, sneakers, etc, cheaply so that inflation in other America kept to a minimum, and the cost of living in the US is kept lower than it should be. Think of the millions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursuits like cars, housing and luxury brands, or to pay for things like school fees, tuition fees, doctors fees, hospital bills, etc.
    2
  13136. Why do you want China's economy to crash? As the world's 2nd largest economy, China's economic collapse would send shockwaves throughout rest of the world and global stocks would plummet, possibly result in a global recession, as Chinese investment dries up, and Chinese companies close down and fire their employees. Therefore, isn't it in your country's best interests to continue supporting China's economy? To avoid the above described catastrophic scenario?
    2
  13137.  @JerjerB  It's fine if you want to live your lifestyle in your country. But China is not your country, so why are you virtue signalling here?
    2
  13138.  @robinfrost5561  In India, you see some beggars or drunkard along the streets, yet these people are allowed to make political decisions regarding the country's future? Why allow ordinary people to vote in political decisions that will affect the country's future? Ordinary people may not necessarily vote responsibly (e.g they fail to turn up to vote) or they may make decisions based on emotions not logic (e.g. Many British don't like foreigners, so they voted for Britain to leave the EU) Or they may lack political awareness of the country's situation, or they may simply be easily influenced by foreign powers (e.g Russian interference in US elections) Why not allow the people who know how to govern, govern? That's what China did, and look how much China is ahead of India. The Indians have been brainwashed into thinking that "democracy is the best form of government" when China is living proof that not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful.
    2
  13139. +Parm Mohan Today, China is the 3rd country in the world (after USA and USSR) to independently send people to space, during the Shenzhou missions. China conducted our 1st "spacewalk" in 2008 during the Shenzhou-7 神舟七号 mission, where a Chinese astronaut exited the interior of the spacecraft while in space and ventured outside of the spacecraft into the vacuum of space, making China the 3rd country to conduct spacewalk. China Shenzhou 7 Space Walk Live Video: youtube.com/watch?v=gMxQEHfU6hM China is also the 3rd country to launch spacestations of our own, such as the Tiangong-1 天宫一号 in 2011, and Tiangong-2 天宫二号 in 2016. Chinese astronauts even conducted a space lecture to Chinese kids down on the ground, and demonstrated simple low-gravity experiments of weightlessness. Chinese Astronaut gives Space Lecture to her students on the ground, directly from space Video: youtube.com/watch?v=OUAuZnpoZ58 China is the 1st Asian country to do this, and even Japan, Korea and India have set to send their own people to space by themselves, or launch space stations of their own.
    2
  13140. 法轮功活了那么久，肯定有中央情报局在后面支持。
    2
  13141.  @chadleach6009  Can't one be proud of both China and the Communist Party of China?
    2
  13142.  @chadleach6009  "Yeah, who are the Americans committing genocide against?" Muslims in the Middle East. The U.S drone strike in Kabul killed 10 Afghan civilians (including women and children) yet the U.S General responsible for ordering the drone attack was found to have not violated any laws according to the Pentagon.
    2
  13143.  @chronokoks  You said: "Taiwan is the real China" If that's the case then why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and escaped to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily), they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Wiping out the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT, yet despite all their initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China.
    2
  13144.  @chadleach6009  How? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    2
  13145.  @chadleach6009  No justice has been done for the 10 Afghan civilians (including women and children) killed as a result of the U.S drone strike, how's that not a genocide? The U.S General responsible for ordering the drone attack was left off with just a warning, so the lives of 10 Afghan civilians mean next to nothing to the Americans? And Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history, so why should China give up our ancestral territories?
    2
  13146.  @chadleach6009  The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet, then what's your point then? Even today, countries all over the world including USA, UK, Canada, Australia, European countries, India, Japan, Korea, etc recognise Tibet as part of China, then why should China give up our territory? Because Westerners say so?
    2
  13147.  @chadleach6009  I'm glad you basically acknowledged that Taiwan is part of China, since you consider China to be in a state of Civil War after all. But is China currently at war with any country? If not, then China can be said to be at peace, since our People's Liberation Army troops haven't had any actual combat experience since our last conflict in 1979.
    2
  13148. If President Trump wants to claim credit for North Korea denuclearization, then why didn't Kim Jung Un just visit Washington directly instead of coming to Beijing?
    2
  13149. 老实说，翻墙之后，就觉得美国人太无知，已经被美媒绑架了。
    2
  13150. @Chloé Gaquerre You're just anti-China that's all. Look at USA hijacking a shipment of medical supplies bound for Germany from China, described as an act of modern piracy. Video: Berlin authorities accuse US of 'piracy', saying mask shipment was diverted at Bangkok Airport youtu.be/1QxJoAv5EFo
    2
  13151. @Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad Those Uighurs in Turkey are always welcome to come back to China if they want to see their kids. Their kids are in Xinjiang so they'll know where to look for them.
    2
  13152.  @katong1953  Great elaboration. Perhaps China should bring up the U.S Chips and Science Act to the next World Trade Organization meeting as being anti-competitive in nature.
    2
  13153. 用隐藏式字幕翻译就可以吧。
    2
  13154.  SS  Video: Mahathir talks about China and Malaysian politics youtu.be/yjl7d0Ongn4
    2
  13155.  @currentchannel3452  So you claim Cyrus is paid by China to promote his peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" then isn't that a positive thing for the world? U.S-China relations have deteriorated to their lowest points in months, and a potential hot war would not only be deleterious for both our countries, but for the rest of the world as well, so promoting the alternative message of war is simply unthinkable.
    2
  13156.  @ZappyOh  "神州 Shenzhou ... Well, it is still something that should be discussed." You're welcome to start your own video about the dangers of autonomous vehicles. In fact, we already have autonomous drones that utilize Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered navigation and operational software.
    2
  13157. United States: "We will be boycotting the 2022 Beijing Olympics." Other 5 Eyes countries: "Us too!" United States: "SIKE! We will be sending 18 officials to attend the Olympics!" Other 5 Eyes: "Wait…what? How are we going to explain our boycott to Beijing now? Why are we even following the US anyway?"
    2
  13158. @tjwcoast It is megalomania when your country makes up just 4% of the world's population, yet seeks to preserve its own hegemonic interests over the rest of the world.
    2
  13159. Wet Markets provide fresh food and produce at affordable prices to people in China, and many other countries in Asia, Africa, South America have wet markets too, so why should China close our wet markets?
    2
  13160.  @ytfp  serpentza is quite dishonest at times and there was one video where he complimented a Chinese in pharmacy in Taiwan saying that "You speak good English". But after he left the pharmacy, he complained to cmilk that that person's English was horrible afterwards.
    2
  13161.  @greasyfingers9250  We do know that serpentza left his home country, as though he does not fit in South Africa. He also does not fit in China with his attitude. I watched serpentza's videos and he always seems to blame the environment, the people, the culture, the government, etc for his problems. Anything but himself. It's as though he has this "white privilege" mentality and expects the world to accommodate his expectations.
    2
  13162.  @wisdomleader85  Initially, serpentza don't seem to fit into his home South Africa (which was why he left SA). When he comes to China, he always seems to be blaming the environment, or the people, or the culture, or the government, etc in his videos about China. He blames everything else except himself, and he somehow seems to expect countries to cater to him, instead of serpentza assimilating into his host countries cultures. It's like somehow he has this "white privilege" mentality and expect other countries to meet his expectations. It is clear that serpentza isn't compatible with China, and from his mannerism and his behavior, he looks like he would fit into Western country like Britain for example. So why does he continue to live here in China?
    2
  13163.  @wisdomleader85  Chinese do critize on local issues like spitting in public and so on, but serpentza takes it a step further. For example, I made earlier point about serpentza pretending to praise a Chinese for speaking good English in Taiwan, but he later admitted to laowhy that he spoke bad English. And there's one time where serpentza complained about all the train stations signs in China were in Chinese, not English, even the public announcement seems to get on his nerves. It's clear that serpentza is not suitable for China, so why does he bother living in China when it appears to be such torture for him? Nobody point a gun at serpentza and force him to live in China. He is apparently able to leave his homecountry in South Africa, then why not move to Britain or some other Western country which seems to suit him better?
    2
  13164.  @wisdomleader85  I believed the "whataboutism" here in this thread first emerged with your post that "@神州 Shenzhou Yeah, I suppose Chinese who criticize other fellow Chinese for bad habits also have "white privilege"." and then going on to quote a video interviewing Chinese views about spitting in public. Therefore, since you yourself turned to "whataboutism" then why can't I post that video by Westerner exposing serpentza as a fraud?
    2
  13165.  @wisdomleader85  serpentza was clearly talking about the Chinese guy's English in both cases about "good" and "bad" so how exactly is it taken out of context? And it wasn't just me who noticed it, but several others in the videos have also made similar remarks about it, so how am I inciting "unnecessary abomination in the audience."?
    2
  13166.  @wisdomleader85  How exactly did I kept repeating that he had "white privilege" for criticizing China? I only mentioned "white privilege" once in this entire comment thread, before you mentioned it yourself in your "whataboutism" about Chinese people doing the same thing. So isn't it you who first brought up "whataboutism" by bringing in Chinese people doing the same thing?
    2
  13167.  @wisdomleader85  Do you actually have evidence that I am part of this group of people to spread pro-government propaganda? And how is it that my talking about serpentza is suddenly linked to pro-government propaganda now? Nobody here mentioned anything about CCP until you suddenly bring up the topic yourself. And you were the one who suddenly brought up that video about Chinese criticising other Chinese, so isn't it a clear case of Whataboutism started by you?
    2
  13168.  @wisdomleader85  I watched serpentza's videos and he doesn't seem to make any close Chinese friends. He always seems to hang out with other expats like laowhy and prozzie, expanding his circle of expat friends, instead of building a circle of local Chinese connections. If he had put in effort to make local Chinese friends then who knows, maybe one of them might help him land a proper job in China. But serpentza doesn't want to assimilate into Chinese culture and constantly portrays himself as foreigner and seemingly putting up walls with Chinese people.
    2
  13169.  @gregsoul  There is nothing politically wrong with my phrasing of that statement. Most of the world's major countries recognise Taiwan as part of China under the One China Policy. Even in ROC's constitution its written that Taiwan is part of China. Therefore why does that statement require correction? The term "Taiwanese" is referring to the Taiwanese Aboriginals who were in Formosa before Chinese people took over the island so what's inherently wrong with my referring to that person as Chinese in Taiwan?
    2
  13170.  @wisdomleader85  Why does everything has to be political? I mean, didn't you yourself posted a video of foreigners interviewing Chinese people's opinions? Then why doesn't serpentza do the same thing then with his Chinese friends? Is it because serpentza doesn't have close Chinese friends himself, despite being in China for more than a decade already? And your whataboutism with the CCP is blatantly obvious as you constantly try and drag the conversation to include the CCP, when the topic is about serpentza. For example, didn't you write the following statement earlier? "The things you accuse Winston of lying about (presuming they're true) are nothing comparing to what the CCP lies about everyday." So isn't this another example of your whataboutism? You even implied that I am part of the group that is pro-government propaganda, without any proof yourself, so why are you purposely trying to steer this conversation to talk about the CCP then?
    2
  13171.  @wisdomleader85  That statement is clearly not from here, and its taken from some other thread. If that other thread's topic happens to be political in discussion, then what's wrong with bringing up that statement in that other thread? You appear to be comparing apples to oranges, by taking statements from some other thread and applying it here, when in this thread, there wasn't any mention of politics (until you started bring up the CCP). I mean, if you want to continue that discussion in another thread you are always welcome to reply on that comment thread elsewhere. But why are you bringing up comments taken from somewhere else and then applying it here? You are taking statements out of context and somehow using it to justify you hijacking this comment thread to talk about the CCP? I mean, you still have zero proof that I am working for the communist party like you blatantly claiming. Where in that statement you quoted did I ever mention the Chinese Communist Party? Why are you seemingly so obsessed with the CCP?
    2
  13172.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Look at how well Taiwan (no communism), Singapore (no communism), Hong Kong (before communism) were/are doing." Taiwan's economic success was achieved by the authoritarian single-party Kuomintang government. The KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, and Chiang kai-shek purged dissidents and political rivals, imposing martial law on Taiwan for 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Yet Taiwan flourished under KMT rule. Singapore has been under authoritarian single-party PAP rule for 57 years, much like how China has been under CPC rule for 72 years. Singapore's founder Lee Kuan Yew was a dictator who exiled/jailed Singapore dissidents. Yet Singapore flourished under PAP rule. And Hong Kong's success was achieved while it was a British colony under authoritarian rule, during which Hong Kong people did not get to vote for their favorite leaders for 150 years. If anything, this shows that a strong centralized government suits Chinese people best, not Western-style democracy.
    2
  13173. As a Chinese and a non-American myself, I actually supported Trump's 2020 re-election over Biden's. I wanted another 4 more years of Trump for the USA, since Biden's true stance towards China is unknown.
    2
  13174.  @urbanistgod  Aztec Empire, Inca Empire, Indian Empire, Achaemenid Empire, Akkadian Empire, Babylonian Empire, Byzantine Empire, Egyptian Empire, Chinese Empire, British Monarchy, French Monarchy, etc, Most of history has been under authoritarian rule, so what makes you think "democracy" is the best system, when it has long history of failure and is unpopular outside of Greece?
    2
  13175.  @urbanistgod  China has always been under authoritarian rule and it worked for 5000 years of Chinese history. China has access to a wealth of knowledge in the form of political literature, military textbooks, governing manuals, etc, on how to govern the world's most populous country, and authoritarianism it worked for China. An authoritarian dictatorship can implement massive plans like building walls and monuments, transitioning the economy, because there is the option to just bulldoze the opposition.
    2
  13176. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  13177. +Captain Midnight If you claim Japanese people are anti-war, then why their PM Shinzo Abe visit the Yasukuni Warshrine memorial, where Class-A Japanese war criminals are housed, in order to pay their respects to their ancestors? Japanese have also modified their historical textbooks to leave out gruesome details of their atrocities in order to "whitewash" their history as shown in this link en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_history_textbook_controversies What atrocities are Chinese government committing now that rivals that of Japan during WW2? China don't invade your countries to rape your women, unlike what Japan did during WW2. Ethnic minority groups in China actually treated better than Han Chinese, because they aren't subject to One-Child Policy, and can have as many kids of their own. As ethnic minorities, they enjoy special tax exemptions, healthcare and educational bursaries. For example, if qualifying for higher education, if Han Chinese need say 500 points to qualify, ethnic minority (like Tibetan, Uighur, Mongolian, etc) need only 300 points (easier to qualify) for the same course as Han Chinese. Do you actually watch any Chinese movies to know what you are talking about? There are also Chinese movies which portray Japan in positive light. For example, in Lou Ye's Purple Butterfly 紫蝴蝶 in 2003, there is a romance between Chinese girl and Japanese student in Japanese controlled Manchukuo. In Jet Li's 2006 Huo Yuanjia 霍元甲 there is an honorable Japanese samurai, who realizes that his superiors had poisoned Huo Yuanjia and called out on their treachery. Why are you acting like all Chinese films portray Japanese as the devil?
    2
  13178. +Captain Midnight Those Monks are involved in political separatist movement masterminded by Dalai Lama, who is using these monks to support his political cause while he is in exile in India. People like Labrang Jigme also exaggerate their torture, such as saying he was "beaten" up for 2 days, but look at him and do you see any visible bruises on his body? Or is he making up propaganda for Westerners to wield against China? He also doesn't represent what every Tibetan think of Chinese government. Chinese government only relocate Tibetans because their old houses were extremely backward, lacking facilities like plumbing, electricity and gas, so the government renovate those houses to modernize them and make living more comfortable for Tibetans. Monasteries may have been destroyed during Cultural Revolution, but the communist party has long admitted to Mao's adverse policies and begin rebuilding the Tibetan monasteries destroyed during the revolution. The Monasteries also serve as tourist attractions, and because of this, Tibet has a growing tourist industry, thanks to the Qinghai railway built to connect the normally isolated Tibet to the rest of the world. Tibet is open for tourism today and not isolated from the rest of the world, thanks to Qinghai railway. Only Tibetan's suspected of being separatists have their passport revoked, but otherwise, Tibetans can travel to India on pilgrimage to see the 14th Dalai Lama. There are also Tibetan students studying abroad, in countries like South Korea and Japan as part of exchange program between our countries.
    2
  13179.  Fishka Grishka  The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    2
  13180.  Fishka Grishka  "神州 Shenzhou ethnic Chinese 1.5 billion do math" Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 PISA in all 3 subjects; reading, science and mathematics. Here's the 2018 PISA rankings. PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment
    2
  13181.  @johanhirte9661  In 2016, the BCI (Better Cotton Initiative) received $1 million in unrestricted funds from USAID. If you go to USAID website, they claim to be an independent Federal Government agency, but they receive overall foreign-policy guidance from the US Secretary of State and are a key component of US foreign policy and national security. youtu.be/_s6UDgf4e0E?t=80
    2
  13182.  Fishka Grishka  You didn't even know that the total population of Uighurs in the world is 13 million, yet you just claim 40 million Uighurs? Where did you get your population data?
    2
  13183.  Fishka Grishka  The Chinese government is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending after the USA: Countries by Research and Development spending 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($275.0 billion) 3. Japan ($165.7 billion) 4. Germany ($118.8 billion) 5. South Korea ($91.6 billion) 6. India ($66.5 billion) 7. Brazil ($38.0 billion) 8. United Kingdom ($44.8 billion) 9. Russia ($42.6 billion) 10 France ($38.4 billion) ... Source: List of countries by research and development spending wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending In the West, researchers often have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    2
  13184.  @johanhirte9661  "神州 Shenzhou So if you audit a cotton factory. How to find out if the worker is a prisoner prisoner and forced labor or not !?" You check their records, how many workers your company hired? How much are they paid? Are their wages satisfactory? Does your company offer overtime payment (especially for harvest season) schemes for workers? Visit the worker's dormitories, are the working conditions tolerable? What's the turnover rate like? Are the workers eating regularly? If you choose to only ask a few people some questions, then I'm sad to say your audit is not considered a proper audit. Auditors are professionals who know exactly what to look for, your company can even hire external professional auditors to conduct audits of your cotton factory.
    2
  13185.  @johanhirte9661  China applies for more patents than any other in the world and we also have the world's largest number of granted patents, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators. Patent applications for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (1,542,002 patents) 2. United States (597,141 patents) 3. Japan (313,567 patents) 4. South Korea (209,992 patents) 5. European Patent Office (174,397 patents) 6. Germany (67,898 patents) ... Patent grants for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (432,147 patents) 2. United States (307,759 patents) 3. Japan (194,525 patents) 4. European Patent Office (127,603 patents) 5. South Korea (119,012 patents) 6. Russian Federation (35,774 patents) ... Source: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Indicators
    2
  13186. Mistakes are unavoidable, what's needed is to learn from mistakes. But when stuck in a hole, the first thing that should be done is to stop digging.
    2
  13187. +The Centre Indian army troops illegally crossed over the border at Sikkim and trespassed into Chinese territory to obstruct PLA road construction, so why is this considered threatening peace? The standoff has been resolved with Indian troops withdrawal, so in the end there was no conflict. India and China have border dispute, but so far, not single bullet been fired over our borders for 40 years, so isn't that a sign of peace?
    2
  13188. nguyen khanh Those seas are known globally as the South China Sea and East China Sea respectively.
    2
  13189. +nguyen khanh China does not claim the seas, only the islands in it. Chinese records mentioned South China Sea Islands since the Song dynasty and there regions around those islands are littered with Chinese cultural artifacts such as pottery fragments from Tang, Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties. So China has historical claim to those islands in the seas, but not the Sea itself of course.
    2
  13190. +nguyen khanh Qing dynasty did government them and included those islands as part of China's territory. Also, if those "territory" belonged to Vietnam, then why did France have to invaded them and annex them into Vietnam? Because it was controlled by China, that's why. Qing dynasty dealt with France as it was colonial power. Vietnam was not independent back then, so how do you expect Qing emperor to deal with the Vietnamese king when it was considered a colony of France? I have shown you proof of Phan Van Dong's letter, then if you call him a traitor, then why is he your leader in first place? Of course its old document over almost 60 years ago, but it is still from your Vietnamese leader, so why isn't it official? It was published in Vietnamese newspaper, so how is it not official at all here? Nobody in the world wants to see a rising China, so they all take sides with anyone opposing China. For example, USA and Vietnam weren't really allies, but because they have China as common enemy. But does this mean your countries are correct? China has these proof and even today, Paracel Islands is being developed as tourist destination, and tourists can go diving and windsurfing there, even get married on one of the churches there. So in the end, who really has control of Paracel Islands? China Promoting Tourism for Paracel Islands nytimes.com/2016/05/29/world/asia/south-china-sea-tourism.html
    2
  13191.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou USA has also explicitly expressed that there will be consequences for China's actions." But Pelosi's visit was a provocation, of which President Xi specifically told President Biden during a phone call, and yet the U.S allowed her to proceed with the visit, and then feign outrage over China's actions?
    2
  13192.  @MarkYeung1  Many in Hong Kong (but not all) suffer from a "colonial mentality" which continues to afflict former colonies. Even though the British physically decolonized from Hong Kong, the "decolonization of the mind" needs to happen in order the heal the mental damage that colonizer inflicts on the colonized.
    2
  13193.  @MarkYeung1  Decolonization will be only be successful if the people of Hong Kong learn to recognize and deconstruct the colonizer's intent pervading their thoughts, preferences and values. Otherwise, no matter how much the British decolonize from Hong Kong, the people will still continue to serve Western interests if the mind remains colonized. You said: "Explicitly, Basic Law stated that Hong Kong Chief Executive has to be accountable to BOTH." Could you point out where in Hong Kong Basic Law does it explicitly state that?
    2
  13194.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "2 million Hong Kong people went to the street to protest against the government." Do you have confirmation that there was really 2 million? The Hong Kong Police deployed on the ground estimated only some 338,000 people followed the protest's original route. You said: "Was it reported by CGTN or People's Daily?" Since there is no actual confirmation that there were 2 million, why would they report unverified news? Also, in May, 2.9 million local residents signed a petition to support the HK National Security law. And on July 2, an online petition signed by 1.65 million local residents was presented at the doorstep of the U.S. Consulate in Hong Kong against U.S. interference in Chinese and Hong Kong affairs. But was this piece of news reported in Western MSM?
    2
  13195.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou yes. Indeed 2 million Hong Kong people marched on June 16th 2019 to protest. It was widely reported and the numbers were closed enough." Where did you get this figure of 2 million? The Hong Kong police forces present on the ground only estimated some 338,000 people that followed the protest's original route, so where did the figure of 2 million come from?
    2
  13196.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "My family was in Hong Kong that day for a family wedding, so we saw it first hand." So, did you personally counted 2 million Hong Kong protestors? The Hong Kong Police were there at the ground in order to maintain order, so they need to accurately estimate how many protestors turned up, and they estimated that some 338,000 people followed the protest's original route.
    2
  13197.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Even if 338000 showed up (I can assure you it'smore than that)" How can you assure me that it's more than that? Did you personally counted 2 million Hong Kong protesters? Otherwise, where did this figure of 2 million pop out from, when the Hong Kong Police on the ground estimated that only some 338,000 people followed the protest's original route.
    2
  13198.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou I am not stirring up old wounds now that the extradition bill has been scrapped." The Hong Kong Extradition Bill was proposed because a Hong Kong man (named Chan) traveled to Taiwan with his pregnant girlfriend (named Poon), and then proceeded to strangle her to death before flying back to Hong Kong alone and leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. The man has since confessed to his crime, and Taiwan wanted to extradite this Hong Kong murderer to face justice, but Hong Kong realized that they have no existing extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to convict Chan for crimes that occurred outside of Hong Kong (in this case, Taiwan). That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the extradition bill so that this loophole won't be exploited in the future. But do the Hong Kong protestors even read the bill and understood its contents in its entirety? Now that the extradition bill has been scrapped, a Hong Kong murder roams free, and there is no justice for the victim's family.
    2
  13199.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "I just want to let you know why some (but not all) Hong Kong people have the colonial mentality." Some people in Hong Kong still have the colonial mentality but think they don't. During the Hong Kong 2019 protests there were people waving United States flag 🇺🇸 and the Great Britain flag 🇬🇧 among the crowds. You said: "Most Hong Kong people including myself love China, and you know that." We've spoken a few times, and every time, you've been incessantly praising the Anglo Saxon culture while seemingly looking down on non-white culture. That's the "colonial mentality" at work here. Unless people can learn to recognize the colonizer's intents pervading their thoughts, preferences and values, and learn to deconstruct them, then their minds remain colonized, even though their physical surroundings have been decolonized.
    2
  13200.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "During colonial period, protest like these WERE REPORTED IN ENGLAND. This is why some Hong Kong people (but not all) would rather have colonial rule rather than being part of China." But the Hong Kong protests WERE REPORTED in mainland China as well, and CGTN has several videos on the Hong Kong protests. So how does this make some people in Hong Kong rather have colonial rule rather than being part of China?
    2
  13201.  @loksky7583  During the Suharto Government in Indonesia (world's largest Muslim population country), the Chinese in Indonesia were labelled as the "Chinese Problem" _(Masalah Cina). Expressions of Chinese culture through language, religion, and traditional festivals were banned and the ethnic Chinese were pressured to adopt Indonesian-sounding names. So some Chinese Indonesian have Chinese ancestry but were pressured to change their names and turn their backs on their Chinese heritage. Seems like the West don't care about how Chinese are treated in Muslim countries, but they "care" about how Muslims are treated in China.
    2
  13202.  @autodidact537  Westerners been polluting the Earth since 200-300 years ago, back when the Industrial Revolution started in 1700-1800s. Whereas China's industrialisation only started some 40 years ago in comparison.
    2
  13203.  @paradoxine6287  There are literally zero Chinese bases inside the Philippines, but you can't say the same for US bases in the Philippines. Who's the real colonizer here?
    2
  13204.  @paradoxine6287  A lot? Name at least 5 of these bases then.
    2
  13205.  @MarkYeung1  How do I not get what Hong Kong heritage is? For 150 years as a British colony, Hong Kong never truly enjoyed democracy and freedoms, it was only during the 1997 handover period that Hong Kong finally get democracy and freedoms, so is that part of Hong Kong heritage?
    2
  13206.  @MarkYeung1  Hong Kong reunification wasn't successful because of those protestors seen waving USA 🇺🇲 flags and UK 🇬🇧 flags among the crowds. The Hong Kong National Security Law aims to target these groups and root out any foreign connections that these people have. Otherwise, they will fester and erupt in another destabilising Hong Kong riot possibly some time in the future. Likewise, whether Taiwan can fully reunify with the mainland depends on how widespread the Western foreign influence is in Taiwan. My personal opinion is that as long as USA remains a superpower, then Taiwan will never fully reunify with the mainland. Mainland China must surpass the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future, only then will Taiwan possibly be rid of the Western influence preventing reunification.
    2
  13207.  @MarkYeung1  Democracy and freedom were NOT part of Hong Kong heritage until the 1997 handover period. Hong Kong actually held more elections AFTER the 1997 handover than they ever did for 150 years as a British colony. So how's it a Hong Kong heritage?
    2
  13208.  @MarkYeung1  "NOT destabilising China, and NOT collusion with foreign powers." I previously explained how destabilising it is for mainland China when it's gateway to the West, Hong Kong is destabilised because of 2019 Hong Kong riots. Even after Chief Executive Lam cancelled the Hong Kong Extradition Bill, the Hong Kong protestors continued until more than 1 year, so something had to be done about Hong Kong riots and that's where Hong Kong National Security Law was proposed, to target those US 🇺🇲 and UK 🇬🇧 flag wavers who are likely to be in collusion with foreign forces.
    2
  13209.  @MarkYeung1  But the very act of giving Hong Kong democracy and freedom is precisely makes Hong Kong more susceptible to foreign influence and becoming a tool of the West. Because after the 1997 handover and the One Country, Two Systems policy, Hong Kong has been infiltrated by Western anti-China forces, so the only way to clear Hong Kong of foreign influence is to introduce the Hong Kong National Security Law.
    2
  13210. Macron has a history of making controversial statements, but ultimately capitulating to whatever the US tells him to do.
    2
  13211.  @GM6.7  China is investing in less developed countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, and also African countries like Nigeria, Angola, Chad, Sudan, etc, building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, schools, hospitals, shopping centers, ports, dams, airports. China has possible done much to improve the lives of Africans in mere decades, as compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. Here are 10 infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Poty Sudan-Khartoum Railway Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China Video: youtube(dot)com/watch?v=TtduKDpy4oc
    2
  13212.  @yslee1401  Recently, the US Congress passed the H.R. 1157 to authorize more than $1.6 billion in five years, just to badmouth China. How much of it did you receive? Because that's all you seem to do in your posts.
    2
  13213. ​ @digreziapartners2148  "terrible for black people" Look at African Americans getting shot/killed by police officers like George Floyd, Ahmaud Abbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks, and so on, sparking off Black Lives Matter protests across the country, and you want to point fingers at China?
    2
  13214.  @digreziapartners2148  Here's video of African Shaolin Monk apprentices training in Shaolin Kung Fu at the Shaolin Monastery in China. Video: African apprentices learn KungFu at Shaolin Temple youtu.be/e9IEaN9YAH4 China treating Africans with a level of respect often not afforded in Western countries. The problem is that you only see the bad sides of China and not the good side.
    2
  13215.  @digreziapartners2148  "神州 Racism is something so much worse in China than in the US." Take ethnic minorities in China for example and ethnic minorities (i.e Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchu, etc) are exempted from the One-Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Ethnic minorities in China enjoy special privileges over the Han, such as tax exemption, priority in healthcare, free education for up to 15 years (9 years for Han), government bursaries and education admission advantages. For example, if Han applicant needs say 600 points to qualify for a certain university degree, then an ethnic minority applicant needs only say 300 points (easier to qualify) for the exact same university course.
    2
  13216.  @digreziapartners2148  "神州 Shenzhou asian boss, very impartial source." I'm glad you feel that way about Asian Boss, I do feel that they do a good job at being impartial and representing multiple sides of the conversation.
    2
  13217.  @digreziapartners2148  "神州 Shenzhou cool, what is the Rate of these people and women doing jobs such as middle and higher Management?" One particular individual that stands out is Hua Chunying of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, she's done at excellent job in exposing the BBC lies about China, in my opinion. video:youtu.be/L0oo8PsUKrA
    2
  13218.  @stopwarstop7334  You said: "You communist party betrayed your own Chinese people by calling the Soviet." The KMT called upon the US for military aid, and the U.S send hundreds of millions of dollars (at 2:10 of Cyrus' video) But the KMT was corrupted and pocketed some $750,000,000 worth of U.S military aid, until even U.S President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves" Even at 2:40 of Cyrus' video, Chiang kai-shek had the nickname "Cash my Check" given to him by Americans.
    2
  13219.  @stopwarstop7334  Then why is it at the Olympics, athletes from cannot compete under the name Republic of China? Instead, Taiwan can only compete under the name "Chinese Taipei" then it goes to show that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  13220.  @Sp3ll633  So you claim mainland China have no control over Taiwan island, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like a free and independent country can? Is there something controlling Taiwan and preventing them from joining the UN?
    2
  13221.  @Sp3ll633  So you're admitting that Taiwan is prevented from joining the United Nations because of mainland China? Then congratulations, you've just proven that Taiwan just isn't an independent after all, it's part of China. Even at the Olympics, Taiwan cannot compete under their own name, they have to use the name "_Chinese Taipei"_ if they want to compete in the Olympics.
    2
  13222.  @Sp3ll633  It's only a matter of time before the remaining few countries stopped recognizing Taiwan altogether. Just recently, the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua switched their recognition from Taipei to Beijing.
    2
  13223.  @Sp3ll633  Which other country has done a veto? The fact that Taiwan cannot join the United Nations already shows that Taiwan is not independent. Even at the Olympics, athletes from Taiwan can only compete under the name "Chinese Taipei" then how exactly is Taiwan independent? Taiwan's influence is decreasing, just look at the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua switching recognition of Taipei to Beijing.
    2
  13224.  @Bratt77  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2020 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 11 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 … So what genocide are you talking about when the population of Uighurs in China actually grown from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020?
    2
  13225.  @Bratt77  Some 45 countries (including Islamic countries like Pakistan, UAE and Saudi Arabia) expressed support for China's activities in Xinjiang. 70 countries emphasized that non-interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states is an important principle of the UN Charter, and this includes China's internal affairs.
    2
  13226.  @Bratt77  You can't refute my point that the population of Uighurs in China tripled in size from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020, so you start calling me a communist shill? Why not attempt to attack my points instead of attacking me personally?
    2
  13227.  @Bratt77  If you're claiming that the CPC doesn't control Taiwan, then why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations? Is there something preventing Taiwan from joining the UN like an independent country could?
    2
  13228.  @Bratt77  But the population of Uighurs in China actually tripled in size so what genocide are you talking about?
    2
  13229.  @Bratt77  You don't like Chinese government, but China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    2
  13230.  @Bratt77  "神州 Shenzhou ya China" Congratulations, you've just shown that Taiwan isn't independent after all when the mainland can prevent Taiwan from joining the UN like an independent country can. Yet why do you claim that mainland China doesn't control Taiwan? Even at the Olympics, athletes from Taiwan can only compete under the name "Chinese Taipei" then it goes to show that Taiwan isn't independent after all.
    2
  13231.  @Bratt77  Why should I wish I was Taiwanese? China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    2
  13232.  @Sp3ll633  About the South China Sea, you should go and look at Taiwan's constitution before you talk about the mainland's claim over the South China Sea Islands. The Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) had claimed the South China Sea under the 11-Dash Line Map they published in 1947. Whereas People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 removed two dashes to arrive at the 9 Dash Line Map. Even now, Taiwan ROC still maintains the claim over mainland China, as well as the 11-Dash Line yet you want to complain about PRC's 9-Dash Line?
    2
  13233.  @Sp3ll633  So according to you, Taiwan doesn't even have control over their own constitution, then you've just proven Taiwan isn't independent after all, if they don't even have sovereignty over their own constitution, isn't it? And Taiwan still actively maintains the 11 Dash Line claim, what makes you think that they don't? Even the arbitration tribunal ruling on the South China Sea, Taiwan denounces the tribunal’s decision as "completely unacceptable"
    2
  13234.  @Sp3ll633  We've already shown that Taiwan cannot join the UN, and even at the Olympics, athletes from Taiwan can only compete under the name "Chinese Taipei", then Taiwan clearly isn't independent. I mean, even you've shown that Taiwan doesn't even have control over their own constitution for crying out loud, they can't just formally declare independence without incurring serious consequences, that just proves even further that Taiwan is not an independent country after all. And did you read about Taiwan rejecting the arbitration tribunal's ruling in the South China Sea? That's because even till today, ROC Taiwan maintains it's 11 Dash Line claims which encompasses a wider territorial claim than even than PRC's 9 Dash Line.
    2
  13235.  @catmandu6776  Taiwan is slowly losing influence, even just recently the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua switched recognition of Taipei to Beijing. Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out is due to perceived U.S military support. But as the USA continues to decline and China continues rising, there will eventually come a day where USA has declined to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise. At which point Taiwan's backing will evaporate and reunification will be inevitable. It's only a matter of time and China is as patient as can be.
    2
  13236.  @catmandu6776  So mainland China offering a better economic deal to the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua so much that they switched recognition of Taipei to Beijing, is considered "bullying" in your eyes? And most major countries (including the United States) also recognise that Taiwan is part of China since the 1972 Shanghai Communique. On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia... The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position. ... Source: The Diplomat: The Shanghai Communique: An American Foreign Policy Success, 45 Years Later
    2
  13237.  @catmandu6776  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, doesn't it appear that the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here? If you claim Taiwan is a free and independent nation, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there something that's preventing Taiwan from joining the UN like a real independent country? Why is it that Taiwan cannot formally declare independence without risking serious consequences?
    2
  13238.  @catmandu6776  How is China suppressing and murdering our own people? Isn't China the country with the world's largest population today? Chinese can travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending coin on your tourism industry. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, are expanding overseas, and Chinese investors are buying up real estate in many countries around the world. So what makes you think Chinese people are suppressed? Chinese can be found all over the world today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all. Obviously China is not perfect either, but there are many achievements in China to be proud of. For example, China is home to the world's largest high speed rail network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen in terms of track length. Previously it took several days just to travel from the city back to one's hometown, but thanks to the advent of high-speed rail, the commuting time has been cut down to mere hours instead of days.
    2
  13239.  @viper2148  Vaccines were invented by Chinese, the concept of Variolation was the method of inoculation first used to immunize individuals against smallpox (Variola) with material taken from a patient or a recently variolated individual, in the hope that a mild, but protective, infection would result.
    2
  13240.  @viper2148  Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought.
    2
  13241.  @viper2148  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    2
  13242.  @viper2148  War results in bloodshed, tragic lost of lives and property. Look at former US President Bush invading Iraq on suspicion of harbouring Weapons of Mass Destruction, but later no WMDs were found in Iraq after the Iraq War. But what is the cost of Iraq War? According to (Source:iraqbodycount.org ) it's estimated 200,000 Iraqi civilians killed as a result of Iraq War, so isn't it a good thing that China isn't currently at war?
    2
  13243.  @Chermaine99  Singapore is going to have lockdown soon. Source: Singapore to Close Schools, Most Workplaces With Rising Virus Cases bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-03/singapore-pm-says-more-steps-coming-on-virus-lee-speaks-at-4pm Singapore will impose stricter measures, that will include closing most workplaces and move to full home-based learning in schools, amid rising cases of local coronavirus infections.
    2
  13244. Peng Shuai is trying to lay low and avoid the public eye for a while until this all blows over, and she has expressed her desire for personal privacy during a video call with IOC. But the WTA is trying to pry into her personal affairs and demanding she appear in public and bare her private life for all the world to see.
    2
  13245. Gonzalo Lira is alive and well. Video:youtu.be/R2yeSOcNlgE
    2
  13246.  @Gnomezonbacon  Tiananmen Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According to Gregory Clark, the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    2
  13247.  @architech02  The Philippines Coastguard (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) shot to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng (洪石成). But which Filipino boat have been fired upon by Chinese Coastguard? Ans: None!
    2
  13248.  @chrishannis1  Before the Communist Revolution, Cuba was a dirt-poor country, but after the revolution, Cubans enjoy better health care than before under their communist government. Video: Cuba: Before and After the Revolution - The Story of When Michael Parenti Visited Cuba youtu.be/YIqm075vC1A
    2
  13249.  @qingdaocitizen7957  Those Western medical equipment like gloves, goggles, masks, gowns and PPE are literally Made-in-China. And in the news, it's Western vaccines like Astrozenica and Johnson & Johnson that are making headlines for unwanted side effects, not Sinopharm and Sinovac (of which both latters been approved by the WHO).
    2
  13250.  @fuemoua8345  China first claimed South China Sea Islands back in 1947 when Republic of China 🇹🇼 published the 11 Dash Line (of which the 9 Dash Line by People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 is based on). Back then, nobody protested about China's claims, not Vietnam, not Philippines, not even the USA. USA even sent US warships (i.e. USS Decker) to help China reclaim the SCS islands, and the USS Decker was renamed ROC Taiping (太平). One of the SCS Islands was even renamed Taiping Island in honour of this ship. Also, in Hawaii only US citizens could vote to join USA, the local aboriginals in Hawaii weren't allowed to vote, unless they agreed to become US citizens themselves (by which then, they'll vote to join). The voting in Hawaii was already rigged in favour of joining the USA. And the people in Guam don't even get to vote in US Presidential elections, just like the people in Puerto Rico can't vote in US Presidential elections.
    2
  13251.  @samthomas1457  The Russian army is fighting carefully in order to minimize civilian casualties, even if it means Russian soldiers will be the one taking more hits.
    2
  13252.  @juancarlosalonso5664  Peng Shuai has expressed her desire for privacy in her personal affairs, yet Western MSM are demanding that she appear in public to explain her private life for the world to see. Why can't they respect her wishes?
    2
  13253. In the past, China experienced brain drain. Today, it appears that it's the U.S that's experiencing this brain drain due to anti-China sentiment, while China is reversing its brain drain through offering economic opportunities to overseas Chinese.
    2
  13254.  @fl338  Since you agreed that Cyrus Janssen is an U.S citizen, then can't Cyrus criticize his home country of the United States? Why do you take issue with this? China is for Chinese people to improve ourselves. Cyrus cannot change China, but he can change the United States, since that is his home country. You said: "Cryus stated a few months ago while he was living in Canada, that he had to bring his children to the US to get them registered. That would not be needed if they were born in the US." According to Chinese Embassy in the U.S, a child born outside of the United States to one U.S. citizen parent and one non-U.S. citizen parent may be entitled to citizenship, providing the U.S. citizen parent had been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for five years, at least two years of which were after s/he reached the age of fourteen. So it's possible that this is the scenario that Cyrus faces.
    2
  13255. Indian media seemingly uses the word "Disengagement" to make it sound less humiliating. Chinese media boldly uses the word "Withdrawal".
    2
  13256.  @Van_frederick  "神州 Shenzhou no one is buying ruble." Did I ever said people are buying ruble? "Any country in Russia that gets paid in foriegn currency has to convert it to rubles as mandated by the Russian government that's why the ruble is "up"." Well, then you've just admitted that countries are buying rubles if they have to convert their foreign currencies to rubles. Thanks for admitting to that fact. "Russia is paying for imports using gold. The ruble is back up because there is nothing else in Russia to use." Meanwhile, USA is paying for stuff using dollars backed by nothing. It's like Wild. E Coyote running off a cliff on to mid-air even though there's no ground beneath him. It's only a matter of time before reality catches up to him. Whereas the ruble is backed up by commodities like gold like you said. Even if you claim nothing else, Russia is literally the largest export of wheat, and Russia might even make it mandatory for "unfriendly countries" to purchase Russian wheat in rubles.
    2
  13257.  john doe  You're American? Why your government just let Muslims refugees flood your country, after fleeing from their own conflict-ridden Islamic countries? Instead of the Muslim immigrants adapting to American culture, your government is allowing them to build mosques, like in Spoysylvania County, Virginia for example. Video: Anti-Muslim ranters ganged up on a Muslim man at a town hall meeting youtube.com/watch?v=INy4gaUrCL4
    2
  13258. Check out some of China's Memes (including political ones) here List of Internet phenomena in China wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Internet_phenomena_in_China
    2
  13259. Eastern China like Shanghai is well developed because of coastal region and Shanghai is well-known seaport. But Western China like Xinjiang and Tibet are located inland and therefore not so well-developed. The government is actively building roads and infrastructure to link to poorer regions in the Western China and help distribute China's wealth more evenly.
    2
  13260. If you want Chinese get out of Tibet, then why not tell non-native Americans get out of America and leave the lands to the natives? Tibet was part of China since 800 years when Mongols conquered it and made it part of Yuan Dynasty China, whereas European colonization of Americas occurred only 600 years ago. China had Tibet for longer than America's entire history as a nation, so why should China relinquish our claims when America is still currently occupied lands?
    2
  13261. How does someone even sue an entire country and expect compensation? I wish China could sue the rest of world for using our inventions like paper, compass, gunpowder, crossbows, banknotes, etc. We'll be rich beyond our wildest dreams.
    2
  13262. Even the United States recognizes that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    2
  13263. Even the United States acknowledged that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    2
  13264.  @stunningandbrave2520  What collapsing country? Even the IMF expects China to grow by 5.2% this year and 4.5% next year. J.P Morgan forecast China's 2023 GDP growth to be 4.8%. So what collapsing country and downward trajectory are you talking about? ... And speaking of being surrounded in a country, have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    2
  13265.  @stunningandbrave2520  Revised down doesn't mean negative growth. The end result is China's economy is experiencing positive growth by those revised percentages, how does that indicate that China is on a downward trajectory and is collapsing? You haven't visited China then how can you claim I am surrounded in a collapsing country? For your information, according to World Tourism Rankings, China is the world's fourth most visited country, so there are plenty of foreigners visiting China.
    2
  13266.  @yslee1401  China publishes more scientific research papers than any other country in the world. For the first time, China has overtaken the United States in terms of the total number of science publications, according to statistics compiled by the US National Science Foundation (NSF). Source: China declared world’s largest producer of scientific articles nature.com/articles/d41586-018-00927-4 The agency’s report, released on 18 January, documents the United States’ increasing competition from China and other developing countries that are stepping up their investments in science and technology.
    2
  13267.  @mypahrizal335  Bat soup actually isn't a delicacy in China (especially not Wuhan) and the bat soup coronavirus origins myth have been debunked as coming from South East Asia instead. Source: Is bat soup a delicacy in China? We debunk a rumour on the origin of the coronavirus observers.france24.com/en/20200203-china-coronavirus-bat-soup-debunk-videos-viral-palau-indonesia Videos of Asian people selling or eating bats have been circulating on social media since news broke of the coronavirus outbreak in China, with claims that bats are a possible origin of the new virus. The FRANCE 24 Observers team investigated six of the most-shared videos. Five were filmed outside China, in Palau and Indonesia. None of the videos had any documented link to the outbreak.
    2
  13268.  @strnglhld  "Actually, the post said he forced her to have sex with him. This is RAPE" Where does it say in Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) that he forced her to have sex with him? In fact, according to her post she actually consented to sex and they continued their relationship after having previously broken it off 7 years ago.
    2
  13269. CurtW1962 If you don't want Chinese to manufacture your products, then are the American workers themselves willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers? If not, then the cost of your products will increase, and all those cheap Walmart prices that Americans love so much will be gone and the cost of living in America will increase.
    2
  13270. Steve Linseeds You Americans want to make trade fair? How do you expect China to do that with USA constantly threatening to impose sanctions on other countries? The United States is the most protectionist country in the world with over 800 of such policies, compared to China's 200-300 protectionist policies.
    2
  13271. Steve Linseeds Loose gun laws in America use make it easier for people to commit crimes like armed robbery and so on. Because of this, law enforcement officers will sometimes shoot first and ask questions later because of the possibility of the suspect being armed with guns. Not to mention making it easier for all those mass school shootings by armed gunmen. How do you expect policemen to properly enforce the laws if the criminals have access to firepower equal to theirs?
    2
  13272.  @kinosyk  Remember China only industrialised some 40 years ago, whereas the West industrialisation began hundreds of years ago, back during the Industrial Revolution.
    2
  13273.  @knowitall5913  No, I'm simply pointing out that anti-China sentiment is brewing in Australia. If you refuse to acknowledge the anti-China sentiment in Australia, then the problem cannot be solved if you don't even recognise that there's a problem going on.
    2
  13274.  @MarkYeung1  So some Westerners can choose to "Boycott Chinese Goods!" but when Chinese consumers boycott Nike, H&M, NBA, Vitasoy for their support of Hong Kong riots and alleged forced labour in Xinjiang cotton, then it leaves a negative impression of China on Westerners? Why the double standards?
    2
  13275.  @MarkYeung1  Mainland Chinese who visited Canada have been abducted by the Canadian authorities such as Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou. Why not Canada release Meng Wanzhou and put on the first flight back to China if you think mainland Chinese should visit Canada?
    2
  13276.  @MarkYeung1  Are you really sure you are living in Canada when statistics show that anti-China sentiment is brewing in Canada? What makes you think Chinese mainlanders are uninformed? Could you prove how you think mainlanders have misconceptions about Canada like you said?
    2
  13277.  @yslee1401  The population of Uighurs in Xinjiang has increased by 16% since 2010.
    2
  13278.  @chrishannis1  China has survived without adopting Western brand of democracy, then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    2
  13279.  @deschan2246  China has 5000 years of history and Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the ancient world wore loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by the rest of the world that a lucrative trade route had sprung up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china) which were in great demand throughout the ancient world.
    2
  13280.  @joeburns88  Britain was colonial power in 19th century, and was eventually overtaken by the United States in 20th century. But China (and also India) had been a economic power for 1800 years prior to that, according to world leading British economist, Angus Maddison. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA_Middle_East.png And it looks as though China is set to dominate the 21st century, if you follow the above trend. So China did not take 5K years to get it together, China is merely returning our former glory is all.
    2
  13281.  @deschan2246  In 2016, China launched world's first quantum satellite, Micius, (墨子) into orbit and demonstrated that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere, smashing the previous record held on Earth. Video: China's Quantum Satellite youtube.com/watch?v=4QlcKuxDGrs Quantum entanglement (in a nutshell) is when two subatomic particles become an "entangled pair", able to influence their quantum states (won't go into detail here) seemingly regardless of the distance involved. One particle could be on the surface of the Earth, and the other on the surface of the Moon, and theoretically, they can still influence each other with no information (known to current science) passing in between them. The longest record for quantum entanglement on Earth is 143 km in at experiment in the Canary Islands. But China has allowed two stations (Delingha and Lijiang station) located 1200 km apart to communicate directly, through our quantum satellite, thus breaking the previous record and showcasing that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere.
    2
  13282.  @deschan2246  In 2018, China launched world's 1st full spectrum hyperspectral satellite for environmental monitoring at Taiyuan Satellite Launch Center, North China. Video: China launches world's first full spectrum hyperspectral satellite for environmental monitoring youtube.com/watch?v=AgYhHaNcjPc This satellite is China's most advanced satellite to date, and capable of performing full range of analysis, thanks to its hyperspectral imaging capabilities. It's advance that it can detect chemical compositions, from atmospheric aerosols, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon dioxide, methane, blooms, water quality, thermal drainage of nuclear power plants, land vegetation, and many more.
    2
  13283.  @dzheyd9609  "Shenzhou. then why million people protest in Hong Kong?" It begins when a Hong Konger (named Chan) flew to Taiwan with his pregnant girlfriend (named Poon) and then proceeded to strangle her to death before flying back to Hong Kong alone and leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. He has since confessed to his crime, and the Taiwan authorities wanted Hong Kong to extradite him to Taiwan to face justice, but Hong Kong realized that there was no proper procedure to do so. Since the crime occurred in Taiwan, Hong Kong's own courts were unable to prosecute him for crimes committed outside of Hong Kong. So HK's Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed an extradition bill to cover up this legal loophole. But then people started protesting and rioting against this extradition bill without first reading its contents, and now that the bill has been scrapped, there's no way to extradite him to Taiwan to face justice for his crimes.
    2
  13284. According to your example, then why should S.K again risk a repeat of the ordeal in 2017, by angering China?
    2
  13285.  @Mr2ee  Excuse me, but who exactly started the trend of "punishment by economy" ? Wasn't the USA famous for slapping sanctions on North Korea, or Iran Nuclear Deal or Russia and any country that displeases it?
    2
  13286.  @sophienben-achour5450  The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Source: Seventeen Point Agreement wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet.
    2
  13287. Chinese government should develop artificial intelligence (AI) killer robots, shape them like Terracotta Warriors, then ship them throughout the world as Chinese cultural artifacts to be displayed in museums and awaken them when the time is right. (I'm kidding of course)
    2
  13288. If China can top US economy by 2025, then why can't China do that? Who says the top economy spot is reserved only for USA and no other country?
    2
  13289. Few decades ago, Chinese people were dirt poor, starving and had no money to spend at all. But after switching from communist market to capitalist, many of us are exposed to consumerism and finding out we actually have money to spend on things.
    2
  13290.  @johncasey5594  You said: "What if Europeans never spent the money and took the risk to explore the oceans, we would have never discovered the Americas." The Americas existed long before Europeans colonized it. Now the Native Americans have become the minority within their own lands.
    2
  13291.  @jonlamontagne  You said: "神州 Shenzhou America did not exist until 1776 when the Constitution was signed." America clearly existed before 1776, you're just conflating the continent of America with the United States. I merely pointed out that America existed before Europeans colonized it, it's just your own hubris to think America would never have been discovered.
    2
  13292.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou China does give massive subsidies to industry." China is not the only country using subsidies. Global Trade Alert, which tracks government policies that affect world trade, assembled an inventory of 18,137 corporate subsidies awarded by China, the European Union (EU) and the United States since November 2008, with most of them in the latter two regions. In other words, the bulk of subsidies were actually awarded by the EU and USA according to Global Trade Alert.
    2
  13293.  @jenimarai1906  "神州 Shenzhou Are You Getting Paid to put this Comment by Copy Pasting.." Is there something wrong with me citing links to support my arguments?
    2
  13294.  @nitin2779  Excuse me, but your BBC video was 2 months ago, dated to 21 Jan 2020 (back when WHO haven't yet named the coronavirus) but now that Covid-19 has a proper name, why are you still referring to it by it's improper name, "Chinese Virus"? And I'm not talking about the virus being racist because it's selective (it isn't) but I'm talking about the humans being racist against Asian Americans (or Asian Canadians, Asian Australians, Asian Europeans, etc) who've become the target of racially-motivated attacks. Video: Asian Americans see racism, discrimination amid coronavirus panic youtu.be/Vc7y7TQe_Dg
    2
  13295.  @hkfoo3333  To be honest, I heard those words from Cyrus during the early days of the special military operation about a year ago. Perhaps Cyrus has changed his view recently?
    2
  13296.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou I saw the uTube video. I don't there was enough evidence for a prosecution or it wasn't serious enough." Well, why was this incident not reported in Western MSM? There's no mention in Western news about this Chinese woman being attacked by Hong Kong separatists and having death threats sent to her workers in shop in Manchester. Chinese Embassy issued a statement but British authorities did not response.
    2
  13297. WION = We Indians Only Negative (about China). BBC = British Bashing China CNN = China Negative News
    2
  13298. Nobody wins in a trade war, and the government is retaliating with light tariffs tentatively to probe US reactions and give them time to consider whether they want to give up, or to fully commit to this trade war.
    2
  13299. China seeking partners, while US seeking puppets.
    2
  13300.  @ronnylim7907  Earlier you asked: "@Lite Rung she is a common girl?" And now you asked : "But saying she is a common chinese girl?" But who in this thread ever said Liziqi IS a common Chinese girl? Lite Rung said Liziqi shows what a common Chinese girl is, nobody here said Liziqi IS a common Chinese girl.
    2
  13301. We could be witnessing the end of the tyranny of the Petrol Dollar.
    2
  13302.  @stusanderson3111  Just search "Lhasa" on YouTube, and many expats have visited Lhasa in Tibet Autonomous Region and filmed religious people praying, spinning those prayer tops and prayer wheels, and even performing full-body kowtows on the ground. Then what makes you think the Buddhists are harassed?
    2
  13303.  @stusanderson3111  You said that the world recognised Tibet as a separate nation in before the 1950s but which country recognised Tibet as independent? Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Tibet broke free of China in 1913 but wasn't recognised as an independent country, even the then League of Nations did not recognise Tibet as an independent country. In 1951, it was the Tibetans themselves who signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. But later the 14th Dalai Lama sold out to the Americans and we have proof from declassified CIA files that the 14th Dalai Lama accepted CIA funding to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government. Source: Wikipedia: CIA Tibetan program And what satellite evidence are you talking about? Could you name a specific example of a Buddhist monastery being desecrated in China?
    2
  13304.  @stusanderson3111  What makes you seem to think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending coin on your tourism industries. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their local peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE are expanding overseas, and Chinese investors are buying up real estate in many countries. So what makes you think Chinese aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the world, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    2
  13305.  @stusanderson3111  Foreign companies that come to China and set up shop here, often require access to Western websites like Facebook, Google, etc, to operate while in China, so the government issue VPN license for these companies. Five-star hotels that cater to foreigners here have VPN access so they can cross the firewall. Even our college students usually require access to Western literature for their research so our colleges have VPN access as well.
    2
  13306.  @stusanderson3111  It's your own country's laws if students vandalize info posters, but have you actually been to China? There's hardly any cases of vandalism going on in our country.
    2
  13307.  @stusanderson3111  Huawei's 5G infrastructure is arguably the most advanced in the world, and many Western 5G companies are just aren't able to keep up, so that's one reason why they ban Huawei 5G in their country. But this plan will backfire, as Huawei will eventually lay down the groundwork and foundation of new 5G technologies, while the West would have to play catch up.
    2
  13308.  @stusanderson3111  Despite China's poor passport recognition in the world, and additional VISA restrictions in some countries, tell me which country in the world does not have Chinese tourists at all? I mean, before 2019, Chinese tourists made over 100 million trips abroad, and this makes China the world's largest source of outbound tourism before 2019. I mean, haven't you notice tour groups increasingly offering tours in Mandarin Chinese in order to cater to Chinese tourists in your lands?
    2
  13309.  @stusanderson3111  "神州 Shenzhou now let's talk about your phones" Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: MBA Skool: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019
    2
  13310.  @stusanderson3111  What makes you think the average Chinese citizen doesn't have access to the Internet without the firewall? China is home to the most Internet users in the world. Here's a list of the countries with the most Internet users List of countries by number of Internet users 1. China (1,010,740,000 users) 2. India (833,710,000 users) 3. United States (312,320,000 users) 4. Indonesia (212,354,070 users) 5. Brazil (160,010,801 users) 6. Nigeria (136,203,231 users) 7. Bangladesh (129,180,000 users) 8. Russia (124,000,000 users) 9. Pakistan (118,800,000 users) 10. Japan (117,400,000 users) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by number of Internet users
    2
  13311.  @stusanderson3111  So you're just complaining about Chinese tourist behavior, but that means that you admit that there are Chinese tourists all over the world? That there are Chinese international students studying in Western schools and universities? That there are Chinese businesses expanding overseas, and Chinese investors buying up real estate in other countries? Then what makes you think Chinese aren't free?
    2
  13312.  @stusanderson3111  Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself? Or since Chinese people are literally everywhere in the world, have you stopped to talk to one of us Chinese people on how life is really like here in China?
    2
  13313.  @stusanderson3111  Besides smartphones, Chinese companies also dominate the civilian drone industry. Here's a list of the Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019. More than half are Chinese companies. Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019
    2
  13314.  @stusanderson3111  Who said athletes were told not to state their views? In fact many athletes had a good time during the Beijing Olympic, but when they try to tell their friends back home, their social media accounts were suspended. For example, American freestyle skier Aaron Blunck's Twitter account was suspended after he praised the 2022 Beijing Olympics, so who's the real censor here?
    2
  13315.  @stusanderson3111  The Beijing Olympics are already over then what's the point of bringing up the athletes village housing being damaged? And if you want to talk about Chinese construction, China is home to world's largest number of skyscrapers according to Skyscraper Center. Countries by number of 150m+ Buildings 1. China (2,710) 2. United States (848) 3. United Arab Emirates (310) 4. South Korea (272) 5. Japan (269) 6. Malaysia (140) 7. Australia (136) 8. Indonesia (128) 9. Thailand (124 ) 10. Canada (122) ... Source: Skyscraper Center
    2
  13316.  @stusanderson3111  You said: "while you have a ski jump right next door to nuclear power station" No, they’re not nuclear plant towers. The cooling towers behind the big air ramp are part of the former Shougang Steel Mill and now form a stunning, if perplexing, backdrop to the world’s first permanent big air facility. In fact, the area has been renovated to include offices and a museum, among other things after the Winter Olympics. It's like you didn't even bother to fact check before you started maligning China.
    2
  13317.  @stusanderson3111  Actually, Beijing has made Olympic history by becoming the first city in the world to host both the Summer Olympics (2008) and the Winter Olympics (2022), so isn't that what the Beijing Olympics will be known for?
    2
  13318.  @stusanderson3111  Did you not realise that those towers were cooling towers before you jumped to conclusions about it being a nuclear plant? What made you think it was a nuclear power station next to the ski ramp? Also many countries that previously hosted the Olympics often found that the Olympic infrastructure built eventually fell into disuse and neglect after the Olympics are over. At least by using Beijing twice as a venue for the summer and winter Olympics, China is helping conserve building materials in the process. Did you also know that the 2022 Beijing Olympics was powered by renewable energy?
    2
  13319.  @stusanderson3111  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China has actually grown from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China Yet the Western allegations of Uighur genocide still persist? When the population of Uighurs in China actually tripled in size over the years?
    2
  13320.  @stusanderson3111  But if you actually bothered to do fact-check, you'll find that those cooling towers next to the ski ramp were not from a power station, this has already been debunked so why didn't you bother to do actual research? And what genocide, given that I've already shown the population of Uighurs in Xinjiang actually tripled in size from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020? You don't even answer any of my questions, yet you constantly demand that I answer your questions?
    2
  13321.  @stusanderson3111  One prime example of Chinese construction is the world's largest single-terminal airport, the Beijing Daxing International Airport (北京大兴国际机场) in Beijing after just 4 years of construction. The starfish shaped design means that every one of the spokes has the same distance from the central hub, and the airport won the award of best airport by hygiene measures in Asia-Pacific in 2020 by Airports Council International. Have you seen videos of this airport in Beijing? It's expected to relief the traffic congestion problems by Beijing's other airport.
    2
  13322.  @stusanderson3111  China literally has the world's largest number of skyscrapers according to Skyscraper Center. Countries by number of 150m+ Completed Buildings 1. China (2,710) 2. United States (848) 3. United Arab Emirates (310) 4. South Korea (272) 5. Japan (270) 6. Malaysia (140) 7. Australia (136) 8. Indonesia (128) 9. Thailand (124) 10. Canada (122) ... Source: Skyscraper Center
    2
  13323.  @sunatarosuna1560  It's apparent that the U.S weaponized "human rights" against countries that they perceive as enemies. But for U.S allies like Saudi Arabia and Israel, even though they violate human rights many times, the U.S overlook their atrocities because U.S is buddy-buddy with the Saudis and Israelis. So the U.S don't really care about "human rights" as long as they can use it against their perceived enemies.
    2
  13324. Brian is the true Brain.
    2
  13325. China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain. Whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    2
  13326.  Dark of the knight  Come, on, I'm not that famous. Besides, all I did here in this thread was make a joke about Trump that's all.
    2
  13327. Why the ROC lose the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan?)
    2
  13328.  @l.u.rehuher3714  The Chinese People's Liberation Army is world's largest land army and China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank has commanded healthy respect from international observers, as its performance parameters are equal to many top Western designs (like the Russian T-90 and the US M1 Abrams), and the Type 99 also packs a few unique tricks of its own. Source: China's Deadly Type 99 Tank vs. Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/chinas-deadly-type-99-tank-vs-russias-t-90-americas-m-1-17836 China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank was even featured in our 70th anniversary National Day parade. Video: China's new generation main battlefield tanks revealed in National Day Parade youtu.be/Ec4Bu2orKTk
    2
  13329.  @l.u.rehuher3714  Besides our tanks, China also have advanced artillery, like the PLZ-05 (PLZ-52) self-propelled howitzer that is ranked among the Top 5 Self-propelled Howitzers in the world. Video: Top 10 Self Propelled Howitzers in the world 2017-2020 youtu.be/AQBcIRwg2fg?t=474 The PLZ-05 is capable of firing a full range of Chinese 155 munitions and having maximum range of fire of 30km (with standard projectiles) and 39km (with rocket-assisted projectiles) the PLZ-05 armour protects against small arms fire and artillery shell splinters. Maximum rate of fire is about 8-10 rounds per minute and on board ammunition supply is about 30 rounds. Powered with 8V51-Cooled Turbocharged Diesel, it can produce an output of 800 horsepower with a maximum road speed of 55 kmph and can achieve a maximum cruising range of 550 km. Video: 10 Most Powerful Howitzer in the World (2019) | Most Effective Tracked Artillery Systems youtu.be/V4UpNJi0HeY?t=360
    2
  13330.  Tom Goddard  The Chinese government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and halt production, closing tourist attractions, imposing lockdown, banning mass gatherings, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and contain the virus. Now it's finally paying off that the virus is under control in China and we are cautiously reopening our economy. Video: Let Wuhan's sacrifice not be in vain youtu.be/YH6JjdANIPY But in Western countries like US and UK, their economies are far too precious to sacrifice so human health has to be sacrificed instead. Donald Trump wants to reopen the economy and Boris Johnson is relying on "herd immunity" to the pull through. So human lives have to be sacrificed instead of the economy.
    2
  13331.  @flaminmongrel6955  Before the start of WWII, the Japanese invaded Chinese province of Manchuria in 1931 (8 years before Germany invaded Poland) and the Westerners were content to let Japan conquer more and more Chinese territory. USA did not want to join WWII, it's only because Pearl Harbour was bombed by Japanese, that USA joined WWII, so it wasn't for China's sake.
    2
  13332.  @flaminmongrel6955  Back then, China did not banned international flights, because there are foreigners in China wanting to get out of China, so why should China ban international flights and stop all foreigners from leaving China if they want to? You're just anti-China that's all and biased against China, so you pin all the blame on China instead of your own country's response to the pandemic.
    2
  13333.  @flaminmongrel6955  What few days later? Can't you be more specific? China locked down all domestic traffic internally by end January 2020 but foreign travel remained open till end of March, because like I said, what if foreigners living in China wanted to get out of China to go back home? You're just trying to pin the blame on China for your own countries mishandling of the crisis. I mean, Western countries allowed many citizens back to their home and many don't even follow proper quarantine procedures for returning citizens. For example, the first reported Covid-19 case in USA was from an American who've been to China and was returning to the USA.
    2
  13334.  @rodrigom.salamanesjr.976  Why not attempt to refute my points instead of hurling personal insults against me for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    2
  13335.  @ianfischer8813  After Japanese surrendered in 1945, the communists had a strength of 1,200,000 (July 1945) whereas the KMT had a strength of 4,300,000 (June 1946) so the KMT still outnumbered the communists by at least 3 times! Source: Chinese Civil War wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Civil_War Yet despite this numerical superiority, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa? And mind you, this was after the Japanese had surrendered in 1945, so there was no more fighting the Japanese. So doesn't this demonstrate KMT's sheer incompetence in their right to rule the mainland?
    2
  13336.  @ianfischer8813  Weakened? But the KMT still had a strength of 4,300,000 (June 1946) compared to the communists strength of 1,200,000 (July 1945) so the KMT still heavily outnumbered the communists by at least 3 times! Yet the KMT still lost the mainland to heavily-outnumbered, ill-equipped, poorly-trained, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Formosa? And mind you, this was after the Japanese surrendered in 1945, so there was no more fighting the Japanese soldiers. Then since KMT lost the mainland, why should Taiwan be allowed to rule the mainland then?
    2
  13337.  @ianfischer8813  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution then Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    2
  13338.  Fail Zero USA 1776  My poll came from US PEW research center. And who said that YouTube is banned in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so? And as far as I know, US President Trump agreed to honor the One China policy after receiving phonecall from President Xi Jinping. Source: Trump Tells Xi Jinping U.S. Will Honor ‘One China’ Policy nytimes.com/2017/02/09/world/asia/donald-trump-china-xi-jinping-letter.html
    2
  13339.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  "神州 Shenzhou okay buddy. After I land I'm going to report him to the university." If your professor suffers consequences just for his remarks, then it's only going to prove that there's no true freedom of speech in the West after all. You'll be proving his point that the West is crap (according to your claim of what he said)
    2
  13340.  @brexitgreens  Perhaps you could elaborate on this source of information, this "personal signals impossible to manipulate" in which you draw your information about Russia from? Everyone draws their information from somewhere, but Western media banning RT News and Sputnik Radio is only presenting one side. Thanks for sharing your equation, mine is China > Russia > the West (as a state, not as people). China and Russia had long been subjected to Western anti-Sino & anti-Russo propaganda, so people who found out that the real China wasn't like the West described, should keep an open mind as to Western portrayal of Russia as well.
    2
  13341.  @brexitgreens  Western propaganda is very insidious, they know how to prey on people's personal prejudice and shape events to frame other countries in a negative light. Even against Chinese, if you talk to many Americans, many of them harbour bad experiences with Chinese tourists or claim that Chinese are stealing their jobs or intellectual property (like @Senior Sergeant Tom Croydon here claims) and the Western MSM knows how to capitalise on this to stir up anti-China sentiment. The same goes for Russians, the Western propaganda capitalise on your anti-Russian prejudice, in order to paint a negative version of events and even though you know that Western MSM is lying about China, you are tempted to believe what Western MSM says about Russia as true. Because of this, many Russians are suffering from the sanctions, and Russian athletes, sportsmen, dancers, artists, musicians, composers are being discriminated against if they refuse to condemn their own country.
    2
  13342.  @brexitgreens  Off-topic junk? JaYoe Nation literally stated in his post (and I quote his words): "It's important to see ALL sides of an issue in order to have a clear impression of the whole." So I don't understand why you are continually accusing me of going off topic. Aren't we presenting different parts of the issue? The only seemingly off-topic part is you bringing China in, when the issue is more about Ukraine and Russia.
    2
  13343.  @ziggyzugg  Ukrainian ultra-nationalist neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion have been killing 13,000 Ukrainians since the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukovych by USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine. Russia is literally putting an end to the Ukrainian civil war that's been going on the past 8 years.
    2
  13344. China has the world's largest population, so statistically speaking, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality.
    2
  13345. Chinese are among the most intelligent and diligent of peoples. Chinese are no strangers to hard work, from blue-collar jobs such as laborer (coolies), rickshaw drivers, farmers, chefs (esp. Chinese restaurants), laudromat workers. As well as white-collar jobs such as doctors, lawyers, dentists, engineers, programmers, scientists and so on. There is no work that Chinese aren't qualified or unwilling to do.
    2
  13346. China able to support 21% of worlds population with only 7% arable land, and still have surplus food for export. China also has world's largest output of pork and mutton in order to feed our enormous population. In seafood, China fishing industry is 2/3 of the world's and in aquaculture, China's fish farms make up 1/3 of farmed seafood worldwide.
    2
  13347.  @MarkYeung1  The Taiwanese badminton team won Gold in Tokyo Olympics 2021, but suffered 2 years of poor results later. That's why the people of Taiwan island were happy that they managed to win Gold.
    2
  13348.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Don't forget, Taiwan can't even compete under its national flag. Is it fair?" Taiwan island inalienable part of China, and the IOC has agreed to only allow the island's athletes to participate under the banner of "Chinese Taipei" with no mention of the name Taiwan, nor showing of the ROC flag or playing of the ROC national anthem. It's part of the conditions that Taiwan's government has agreed to in order to send its athletes to compete in the Olympics.
    2
  13349. Yes, it's as though they are saying: "The link goes back to me, therefore I am the source of those evidence!"
    2
  13350.  @chrisbell238  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country (since our last conflict in 1979), whereas the US has been involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Afghan War, even in the 21st century. Also, didn't China informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia-like illness on 31st Dec 2019?
    2
  13351. You Americans have multiple parties, and they constantly blame each other for America's woes (rising debt, healthcare, military budget) and after 4-8 years, the US presidents have to step down, so they can't make plans for America spanning more than 10 years. Can't you see that America's problems need at least 10-20 years to address, and no single POTUS is able to solve all of America's woes, given his short presidential term? Whereas in China, the Communist Party of China has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 15-year plans, 20-year plans, etc, to map out China's direction and future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc, and to set specific goals to achieve by then. By abolishing the Chinese Presidential Term Limit, our leaders can remain in power to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition. The USA plans short term, whereas China plans long term.
    2
  13352. Singapore imposing sanctions on Russia didn't seem like a wise course of action. Singapore is the only ASEAN country to have done so, and in response, Russia included Singapore on a list of "unfriendly countries."
    2
  13353.  @ryannverano6452  Chinese fisherman have been fishing around Spratly Islands since history. In the Song Dynasty work Zhu fan zhi by Zhao Rugua, the name "Thousand Li Stretch of Sands" (Qianli Changsha, 千里長沙) and the "Ten-Thousand Li of Stone Pools/Beds" (Wanli Shitang 萬里石塘, or Wanli Shichuang 萬里石床) refer to Paracel and Spratly respectively. Wanli Shitang is also recorded in the History of Yuan to have been explored by the Chinese during the Mongol-led Yuan dynasty and may have been considered by them to have been within their national boundaries. The Mao Kun map dating from Zheng He's voyage of the early 15th century, Shixing Shitang (石星石塘) refers to the Spratly Islands.Another Ming text, Haiyu (海語, On the Sea), uses Wanli Changsha (萬里長沙) for Spratly and noted that it is located southeast of Wanli Shitang (Paracels). Source: Mao Kun Map wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MAO_KUN_MAP-19.jpg
    2
  13354.  @ryannverano6452  I gave you an example of Philippines Coastguard (patrol boat Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) shooting to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman Hong Shicheng (洪石成) but which Filipino fishermen been shot by Chinese coastguard? None! Your Philippines coastguard killed a Chinese fisherman, but no Filipino fishermen was shot by Chinese coastguard.
    2
  13355.  @ryannverano6452  Look at American-Philippine War. The Americans promised Philippines independence from Spain, but after signing 1898 Treaty of Paris USA betrayed the Filipinos and claim Philippines as an American colony, resulting in American-Philippine War where 4,000 American soldiers died but 20,000 Filipino soldiers died, and a whopping 250,000 Filipino civilians died. Video: The Philippine American War-The Shocking Truth youtu.be/bN2wrZGcs8s In the end, Philippines became an American colony.
    2
  13356.  @ryannverano6452  So you're saying that those 56 Palestinian children bombed by Israel were all paid victims? Those 200 Palestinian civilian deaths were orchestrated by Hamas? Or is it an excuse for Joe Biden to sell $735 million weapons sale to Israel?
    2
  13357.  @ryannverano6452  So according to you, Chinese historical evidence is not credible, but somehow your Filipino history is? Why the biased double standards?
    2
  13358.  @ryannverano6452  Taken from Page 11 of War or Peace in the South China Sea? (by Timo Kivimäki): The Philippines gained independence in 1946, but when nationalists within the Philippine government wanted to claim the Spratlys, their American advisors discouraged them. The Spanish-American treaty of 1898 made out clear that the western limit of the Philippines islands did not include the Spratlys, and the United States was not keen to carry the cost of a Philippine irredentist adventure that might bring conflict with Chiang kai-shek regime in China. Source: War or Peace in the South China Sea? (by Timo Kivimäki) Page 11 books.google.com/books?id=CNVf9R_L5FAC&pg=PA11&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false So the Spratly islands weren't part of the Philippines since the 1898 Treaty of Paris.
    2
  13359.  @fcl3294  We were talking about Tiananmen Square Massacre itself, why are you shifting the goalpost elsewhere to the streets leading to the square? As for Tankman, we now know from the cameraman himself that his widely-publicised photo was taken from his hotel window the day AFTER the riots, and the tanks were going away from, not into, the Square.
    2
  13360.  @sayaandyangsaya2756  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    2
  13361.  @MarkYeung1  你搞错了，示威不是200万人，香港警方估计有10万-20万人而已。 One extradition bill, hundreds of thousands of protesters scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/3013929/one-extradition-bill-hundreds-thousands-protesters-why-hong
    2
  13362.  @kirakamu9246  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳. Mao and the communists had succeeded in reunifying our divided country, where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. It was during Chinese Civil War, so of course Chinese were killing Chinese. Just like during the American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans. Or Vietnamese killing Vietnamese during Vietnam War. Or Koreans during Korean War or any civil war for that matter. When Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    2
  13363.  @kirakamu9246  Every stereotypical blue-collar Chinese job you think of has a element of hard work associated with it. Coolies, railroad workers, rickshaw drivers, chefs (of Chinese restaurants), laundromat workers, farmers, grocery stall owners, literally any hard working job you can think of, you'll find Chinese workers willing to do work for it. That's what poor people do, they take up jobs to save up money and eventually lift themselves out of the poverty. It's a set of virtues that makes Chinese people successful at what we do.
    2
  13364.  @kirakamu9246  Why can't a country have culture despite having 9 different languages? India has a total of 179 languages and 544 dialects, so what's your problem with a country speaking different languages? Switzerland has four national languages: German, French, Italian and Romansh, means that Switzerland has no culture? I don't understand your logic here. Shouldn't it be more languages = more culture?
    2
  13365.  @nicholaslee5473  About success rate, popularity or profit of Chinese restaurants compared to McDonald’s, there are literally more Chinese restaurants in USA alone than all the McDonald's, KFCs, Pizza Huts, Taco Bells and Wendy's in America combined, how is that not proof of success or popularity? Here's a list of the most popular takeaway option and Chinese food comes in second just after pizza. Pizza is top in 44 countries, including India and Germany, while Chinese food is second, coming top in 29 countries, including Britain and America. Sushi is third - the most-searched-for takeaway in 10 countries, including Sweden and unsurprisingly, Japan. The World's Most Popular Takeaway Choices 1. Pizza - 44 (countries it's the most-searched-for takeaway) 2. Chinese - 29 3. Sushi - 10 4. Fish and Chips - 6 5. Fried Chicken - 5 6. Indian - 4 7. Korean - 3 8. Thai - 2 …… Source: The World's Most Popular Takeaway Choices dailymail.co.uk/travel/escape/article-9167101/Pizza-worlds-favourite-takeaway-meal-Chinese-Britain-America.html
    2
  13366.  @lyuuy1520  Before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under British colonial rule and the 1956 HK riots resulted in 59 deaths while the 1967 HK riots resulted in 51 deaths. That's some British police brutality for you. Yet after the handover back to mainland China, today's 2019 HK riots resulted in zero deaths thus far by the Hong Kong police, so aren't the police showing incredible restraint here? Despite being under severe stress every day dealing with the HK protestors, enduring physical and mental fatigue after months of protests and facing public humiliation by the masses?
    2
  13367.  @MarkYeung1  Meng did not violate any of Canada's laws, yet she was unlawfully detained by Vancouver authorities. Meng was not permitted to speak to a lawyer and her laptop, phone and devices were unlocked and the contents searched illegally.
    2
  13368.  @neilhallam8028  Those cities are gradually being filled up, as millions of people migrate from the rural countryside to the urban centers.
    2
  13369. Hong Kong is dependent on the mainland for food, water and even electricity. About 70% of Hong Kong's water demand is met by importing water from the Dongjiang River in neighbouring Guangdong province in the mainland. Hong Kong electrical grid is interconnected with the China Southern Power Grid of Mainland China. Hong Kong imports 23% of its total electricity needs from the mainland. Source: Water supply in Hong Kong wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_supply_and_sanitation_in_Hong_Kong Source: Electricity sector in Hong Kong wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_Hong_Kong#Interconnection_with_China So how exactly is Hong Kong going to separate, when they rely on the mainland for basic necessities?
    2
  13370.  @Stopinvadingmyhardware  The US is most certainly not going to risk any of its higher tier weapons ending up in China, if conflict breaks out over the Taiwan Strait, therefore they don't send the most advanced weapons to Taiwan. One example of a lower tier weapon is the Volcano mine system, which is only in use by a handful of others around the world.
    2
  13371.  @MarkYeung1  Taiwan used to be one of Four Asian Tigers but since democracy was introduced to Taiwan, it's economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving for jobs in the mainland or Singapore Video: How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents | Insight | CNA Insider youtu.be/P3BCnPb8qHY?t=110 "From the '90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreements on policy matters. This produced less effective policy making. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be more conservative in Taiwan, so they do not enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou, Research Fellow, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica
    2
  13372.  @Andy-P  China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US short term leadership. This is one reason why USA is in decline and China is rising. The USA can't seem to get their act together and they lack a long term strategic goal against China. He who fails to plan, plans to fail.
    2
  13373.  @MarkYeung1  Evergrande's Company chairman Hui Ka Yan stressed during a meeting on Sunday that no one at Evergrande would be allowed to "lie flat", urging employees to fight day and night so that sales can be resumed and debts repaid, Evergrande said in a statement. "With the company resuming construction work at full steam, the group plans to deliver 115 projects in December," Hui said in the statement. "With five days left this month, we must go all out to ensure we meet the goal of delivering 39,000 units this month." The statement said Evergrande had resumed cooperation with more than 80% of decoration companies and long-term suppliers, having signed 6,869 contracts with material suppliers. Additionally, China's central bank said it would safeguard the legal rights of home buyers.
    2
  13374.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "The amount of foreign investment of United States (and China) means nothing to most of us." Since you're living in Canada, of course it doesn't mean much to you. But for people living in USA and China, we are the world's 2 most largest economies and more foreign investment entering our countries means our businesses will grow and prosper, so of course it matters to us. You said: "As you have pointed out already, many foreign companies wound up leaving China for various reasons." Again with the pessimistic attitude, I don't understand how you can claim to be an optimist by nature. Those foreign companies left China because Trump's tariffs made it difficult to sell Made-in-China goods to the 300 million consumers in USA. But if China can transform our 1.4 billion population into consumers ourselves, then we'll be the largest consumer market in the world (if we aren't already) and this will woo foreign companies to come back to China.
    2
  13375.  @MarkYeung1  Because US-China relations are deteriorating, even Australia, Canada and the rest of the 5 Eyes countries have deteriorating relations with China, and they just blindly jump on board President Biden's call to boycott the Beijing Olympics, yet now it appears that the USA is backtracking on their diplomatic boycott applying for 18 officials to attend the Olympics in Beijing. Yet those 5 Eyes countries just blindly follow the USA.
    2
  13376.  @wally6193  America's immigration laws are too loose. As long as an immigrant have a family member or relative who's an American citizen, they are already eligible for US citizenship. That's why many Mexicans, Muslims and Asians marry Americans for US citizenship, so they can bring their entire families over. Because US immigration laws are too loose. Whereas China has strict immigration laws, since we are world's most populous country. China only accept the bare minimum number of immigrants and no more than absolutely necessary. Priority citizenship is given to those who have something to contribute to China, like doctors, lawyers, engineers, scientists, researchers, businessmen, entrepreneurs, and so on. Lower priority citizenship is given to refugees, drunks, drug-addicts, dissidents, deadbeats, traffickers, and other such people.
    2
  13377. China's Covid-19 response: sacrifice businesses to save lives. The U.S. Covid-19 response: sacrifice lives to save businesses.
    2
  13378.  Charles Schmidd  So you have no proof of your own? Then why are you accusing mine of fake news?
    2
  13379. Tibet was historically part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty China and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Source: Map of Yuan Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/04/yuan.jpg Source: Map of Qing Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/06/f114660d2bf5452994135c4c.gif Even today, countries all over the globe recognise Tibet Autonomous Region as part of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳.
    2
  13380.  @richarde.halliburton8022  How about the U.S drone bombing and killing children and an Afghan aid worker (who was loading bottles of water, not explosives into a vehicle)? All the U.S general did was apologize and that's the end of the story.
    2
  13381.  @payfra  Hong Kong electrical grid is interconnected with the China Southern Power Grid of Mainland China. Hong Kong imports 23% of its total electricity needs from the mainland. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_Hong_Kong#Interconnection_with_China
    2
  13382. In the Past, USA did not care about their U.S allies during their shambolic withdrawal from Afghanistan In the Present, USA isn't putting boots on the ground to defend Ukraine, nor impose a No-Fly Zone. In the Future, will USA send troops to defend Taiwan in a conflict with the mainland? Given their Past and Present actions?
    2
  13383. It's called the International Space Station even former Soviet Russia can contribute supplies to ISS, yet why our country China is forbidden from working with the ISS? Space exploration should unite all humans, not ostracise us Chinese people.
    2
  13384.  @FreeSpeech-z6j  "Façade Diplomacy" best describes the United States of America, not China.
    2
  13385.  @YM-ay24S  Which part of China did you lived in?
    2
  13386. China is reviving the "Mandate of Heaven" doctrine in which a competent leader is allowed to stay in power, to maximise the benefits to China, whereas an incompetent leader will be eventually overthrown by rebellion, all part of Heaven's decree. This doctrine may be ancient, but it has successfully guided China for 5000 years of history.
    2
  13387.  @Aramsa-Khan  His name 酒鬼 means "Drunkard" in Chinese.
    2
  13388.  @CyrusJanssen  When you said: "I'm not a communist," I'm wondering is it because you genuinely aren't supportive of communism itself, or is it out of peer pressure as many Westerners been demonising this ideology?
    2
  13389.  @CyrusJanssen  I fully respect your beliefs, it's just that similar to how Western MSM tries to demonise China, it also tries to do the same to "communistic/socialist" countries like Cuba, Venezuela, and especially North Korea. I applaud people who broken through Western MSM negative portrayal of China (certainly no easy task), but I would encourage people to take it one step further and apply the same skeptism of Western MSM portrayal of Cuba, Venezuela, DPRK etc as they did for China. After all, why is USA so intent on painting these smaller countries as "threats to democracy" and demonising their governments and political systems? Could it be that contrary to popular perception, these countries actually prefer their current government and political systems? What is motivating the USA to keep spending money putting these countries down? I agree that being a global citizen, trying to understand and get along with as many people, is a noble goal. A good starting point is figuring out why some things are portrayed bad in the first place and then perhaps expanding from there.
    2
  13390. China's Covid approach is to sacrifice business to save lives. The United State's Covid approach is to sacrifice lives to save businesses.
    2
  13391.  @robertmiller2173  NZ, Australia, Japan, SK make up the Global North countries but they are a minority. The fact is that many Global South (which compose the world's majority) either abstained or are in support of Russia's special military operation.
    2
  13392.  @andrenogueira5058  The communists legitimacy to rule China is even supported when UN countries democratically voted to recognize the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 as China, while kicking the Republic of China 🇹🇼 out of the UN Security Council. The UN Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the UN Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The poll results were: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained ... Source: Wikipedia: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 Since the PRC won the vote with two-third majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971 and recognized the PRC as "the only legitimate representative of China to the UN" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" from the UN. In other words, the UN countries democratically voted to recognize the communist's legitimacy over China in the UN.
    2
  13393. Didn't Trump said he'll win the trade war in a week?
    2
  13394.  @maximusbrandon9971  Trump's tariffs won't last forever and he will eventually have to step down as US president, and the next US president might just start reversing Trump's policies and lift the US-China trade war, thus restoring US-China trade relations back to their previous pre-tradewar levels. Who knows?
    2
  13395. China has done much to help ease tensions between North Korea and USA. It is these two countries that are constantly raising tensions in Korean peninsula by testing missiles and sending warships and aircraft carriers groups to the otherwise peaceful East Asia. The government can at the most, act as a mediator between the conflict between USA, North Korea and South Korea in order to settle their issues.
    2
  13396.  @allistairneil8968  Today China is a country of homeowners with more than 90% of households owning homes (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations (Huang et al., 2020). This achievement is particularly impressive and is in sharp contrast to the recent decline of homeownership rate in the U.S., Western Europe and other developed countries. Singapore has a home ownership rate of 88.9% which is around the same rate as China's.
    2
  13397.  @allistairneil8968  Germany has a home ownership rate of 49.6 percent, making Germany one of the countries with the lowest home ownership rate in Europe. You said: "I have never seen a homeless person in Singapore, whereas in China I have, in Shanghai, Urumqi, Nanning and Hong Kong." This is anecdotal, and just because you haven't seen any in Singapore, doesn't mean that they don't exist. On YouTube, there's a video of a 82-Year-Old Living At a HDB Void Deck in Singapore.
    2
  13398.  @allistairneil8968  "神州 Shenzhou No they are both repressive regimes, but the CCP are considerably worse." China sees on average some 500 protests every day. The number of annual protests has grown steadily since the early 1990s. In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010. (That's an average of 493 protests every day in China in 2010) Singaporeans are not allowed to protest.
    2
  13399.  @allistairneil8968  In 2022, there was a one-man protestor holding up a "smiley face" cardboard sign in front of a police station in Singapore and he was charged. Yet you think the CPC is considerably worst?
    2
  13400. ​ @allistairneil8968  He's a Singaporean Chinese, named Jolovan Wham, and he was sentenced to one-week jail term, just for holding up a smiley face placard in front a police station. Yet you think the CPC is considerably worst than the PAP?
    2
  13401.  @allistairneil8968  So it appears that you rather just insult this person's name rather than blame their government? Then how can you claim that the CPC is considerably worst than the PAP?
    2
  13402.  @allistairneil8968  I mean, you can't even protest in Singapore at all, whereas in China there are some 500 protests every day, according to the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
    2
  13403.  @allistairneil8968  "I claim these fact to be true only to annoy you." So they aren't true then, since you are only doing it out of petty feelings.
    2
  13404.  @allistairneil8968  So it appears that you cannot refute my points, and you're only claiming those to be true out of spite. What's your beef with the Communist Party of China, when in Singapore, you cannot even hold up a placard of a smiley face in front of a police station?
    2
  13405. Honestly speaking, it is the African government that is impeding the continent's progress. Here is a video about Chinese complaining to his African (Congolese I think) college about the conditions in Africa, The Chinese company was contracted to build a railway 6 months earlier, but hasn't started AT ALL, due to lack of government approval. Africa had railways since 1930s (something China didn't have at that time) yet the people did not learn how to maintain it. The infrastructure experience wasn't passed on, and the lines deteriorated after Africa was freed from colonial rule 50 years ago. Video:We Wuz Kings A Chinese Man Is Angry At Black Africans For Being Incapable Of Building Anything! youtube.com/watch?v=mtsa0MT2H4I Whether you people want to call Chinese people as colonizers or not, Chinese companies are still being contracted to help develop Africa. And if you want the brutally honest Chinese opinion of Africa, that this man's opinion is about as frank as possible.
    2
  13406. Deren Bong Chinese workers help build infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, schools, hotels, hospitals, shopping centers, football stadiums, powerstations, and telecommunication projects in African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Angola, etc, so how is that not empowering the African people? With the recent growth and economic improvement, more Africans students are returning to Africa after studies abroad in order to bring their skills and industry home.
    2
  13407.  @pollumG  Agreed, and truth be told, Hong Kong experienced great economic progress under authoritarian British colonial rule, and its after Hong Kong handover to mainland China, did its economic began to fall behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Ningbo, etc.
    2
  13408.  @Something-tz2vw  Look at a map, look at where those island are. Notice the biggest island in the Spratly? That's Taiping Island, a real island that's claimed by the Republic of China. So Taiping Island is closer to the Spratly Islands than Palawan island of the Philippines. Because Taiping Island is literally one of the Spratly Islands, it was named in honor for the ROC warship (ROCS Taiping) that was sent by the ROC to liberate those islands from Japanese occupation during WWII.
    2
  13409. They "defend the democracy" with the blood of innocents too
    2
  13410. @Sheriff Lobo The American Arms Industry is the Military Industrial Complex youtu.be/oFKLlEsD0Rc
    2
  13411. @Sheriff Lobo "神州 Shenzhou a guy with 1k subs is an impartial source for proving your source." That's a good thing isn't it? To have an impartial source proving my point?
    2
  13412. @Sheriff Lobo Smaller American arms dealers are still part of the U.S military industrial complex, isn't it? And you literally admitted that my source was impartial, so isn't that a good thing? We want impartial sources, not partial sources.
    2
  13413. 终有一天中国和台湾统一。
    2
  13414.  @primeroultimo  If you're talking about protectionism, then the United States is the world's most protectionist country from 2008-2013 according to Global Trade Alert having taken over 800 protectionist measures during this period. The European Union had taken over 300 protectionist measures, whereas China only taken 200-300 of such measures in comparison over the same period. Source:https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Protectionism#Current_world_trends
    2
  13415.  @primeroultimo  Well, that just implies that the USA is not a "free market" after all, when farmers, companies and special interest groups can ban products and "exert control" over the market and economy. And like my earlier article shown, the USA is world's most protectionist country having taken over 800 of such measures compared to China's 200-300 measures over the same period.
    2
  13416.  @MarkYeung1  Because the majority of the people in Shanghai aren't protesting. Contrary to what Westerners (and what some overseas Chinese) think about China, you are allowed to protest in China. Some people in Shanghai have demanded release (and some gotten it) but the figure is quite small, probably around two dozen at the most. The majority of the people in Shanghai aren't protesting.
    2
  13417.  @MarkYeung1  It may come as a surprise to many Westerners (as well as overseas Chinese brought up by Western media) that the government in China actually listens and responds to the citizens. For example, Beijing recently scrapped China's first covid vaccine mandate proposal after the online backlash from Beijing residents in response to the measure. In contrast, some Canadian truckers protesting vaccine mandates during the "Freedom Convoy" had their bank accounts frozen by the Canadian government.
    2
  13418.  @p.f.886  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    2
  13419.  @DZ477  "China stole masks from Canada, Australia, UK and the US" Where's proof of your accusations? Chinese bought those masks legally and paid cash for them. Money was flowing out of China into your countries with each purchase, so how was that stealing?
    2
  13420. 世界没有什么客观的视频。
    2
  13421. Ren Zhiqiang is a member of the Communist Party of China himself.
    2
  13422. Another quote is "In order to pick up the heavy gun, we must let go of our children". So many people today can hug their children today, thanks to those who picked up guns.
    2
  13423.  @leehyunsong7001  If our lawyers commit crimes in China then they will be investigated under Chinese laws. But Meng was arrested in Canada even when she did not break any Canadian law and the USA thus far, hasn't released any information on her alleged crime.
    2
  13424.  Naikomi  I've showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China, and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD fullscreen for the best experience)
    2
  13425. Westerners have been polluting the Earth for 200-300 years ago, since the start of the Industrial Revolution back in 17th century, whereas China only recently industrialized 30-40 years ago, so why don't USA look at its carbon footprints from many years ago?
    2
  13426. So should Chinese people start complaining about Americans making use of Chinese inventions? Chinese people invented the Four Great Inventions 四大发明 each of which have gone on to influence the world in their respective sectors. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and distributing of knowledge easier. The Compass has made global navigation easier and safer. And gunpowder has gone on to revolutionize modern warfare. But do Chinese people complain about Americans making use of Chinese technology? Do Germans complain to Americans about making use of their German Engineering?
    2
  13427. PLA Navy may be untested in battle, but that does not mean that Chinese people aren't ready to defend our sovereignty and protect our homes and loved ones from the invaders from across the Pacific Ocean.
    2
  13428.  Edmund Kemper  You need a 50¢ donation, is that what you are saying?
    2
  13429. The two parties, Republicans and Democrats in the USA are more interested in fighting each other and sabotaging each other's plans, rather than solving America's problems. Each side tries to take credit for any success, while pinning the blame on the other party for America's woes. Whereas in China, the Communist Party of China has no other party to blame, so they have to shoulder responsibility for policies.
    2
  13430.  @stupidtreehugger  Ancient Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions 四大发明 which have greatly influenced the rest of the world. Paper and Printing made recording and transmission of knowledge much easier. The Compass made navigation much easier and journeys more safer and Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought.
    2
  13431.  @NordpolYpsilon  If serpentza and laowhy are honest about China, then they honestly don't like China. I mean, they hardly speak any Mandarin themselves and they don't make any local Chinese friends, instead they hang out with other expats like prozzie, instead of building local connections. They are building a circle of expat friends, not a circle of local Chinese friends. Their Mandarin proficiency sucks and you can't have decent conversations with them in Chinese about various everyday topics that Chinese people are interested in! Have you really not seen the way they behave, their mannerisms and even their facial expressions when they talk about China? They clearly don't love China so how is that being honest?
    2
  13432. A joint survey by Harvard University and Ash Center has revealed that around 90% of Chinese support the Chinese government. Whereas Lai only received 40% of voters support in Taiwan.
    2
  13433.  @jp95js  President Xi Jinping never stated that he wants CPC to rule Taipei. President Xi actually offered to extend the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy to include Taiwan. This means Taiwan can keep their political system and their elections, only that it fully embrace the idea that Taiwan is part of China under the 1C2S policy. But Taiwan rejected this offer and did not offer a counter proposal of their own.
    2
  13434.  @jq9805  The term CCP isn't really accurate. The name of the party is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where Zhōngguó (中国) means China and Gòngchǎndǎng 共产党 means Communist Party. So the more accurate term should be the Communist Party of China (CPC) instead of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Because Zhōngguó 中国 refers to China, not Chinese.
    2
  13435.  @martinfiedler4317  You said: "Both, the ROC and the PRC are sovereign countries. There is no "China" above either one of them under international law." In 1971, the UN voted to recognize the People's Republic of China as "China" and to kick Taiwan out of the UN Security Council. Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The vote was 76 in favor (of PRC), 35 against and 17 abstaining. Since PRC won the vote with two-thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971 and recognized the PRC as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and ROC was kicked out.
    2
  13436.  @theo1216  You speak about a war breaking out between mainland China and Taiwan, but is there a build-up of People's Liberation Army troops at the mainland/Taiwan border in the Taiwan Straits (like Russian's troop build-up at its border with Ukraine)? If not then why are you convinced there will be war between the mainland and Taiwan? And what makes you think I can't type Tiananmen Square? Tiananmen Square is one of China's largest parade square, where Mao Zedong proclaimed the founding of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 back in 1949, and where the portrait of Chairman Mao is hung.
    2
  13437. It sounds nice on theory but doesn't necessarily work during implementation. Given any large group of people, there are only a minority of intellectuals (who know way more about politics than the average person) yet because of 1 Person, 1 Vote, they have the same democratic power in an election, as the next person (who knows nuts about politics). Why not let people who know how to govern, govern? That's what China is doing.
    2
  13438.  @jaimemartinez9792  What is the Chinese way? Chinese way is not 1 Person 1 Vote, our country has always been under the authoritarian rule of Emperors and the Imperial Court.
    2
  13439.  @CharlieDoodleGirl  Many of the athletes who attended the Beijing Olympics have positive things to say about the event. For example, U.S. Olympic skier Aaron Blunck said praised the Beijing Olympics, but was unfortunately suspended from Twitter as a result of his praise.
    2
  13440. @sunflower Are you somehow trying to change the actual definition of genocide? The population of Uighurs in China grew from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020, so what genocide are you talking about? You're not kidding when you said you can see the back of your head after rolling your eyes so hard, it's because your head is empty that's why your eyes can see right through to the back of your head.
    2
  13441.  @taysikuu1748  Agreed. Sadly the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset never truly died off after the Japanese surrender. Even today, there are surges of anti-Asian hate crimes in the West, targeting anyone of Asian descent, including Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese, etc. If China rises, then the perception and standing of Asians also rise with it. If China is demonized, then all Asians suffer demonization as well.
    2
  13442. +Dragon Cocplayer In Chinese, 精虫 (Jīng Chóng) would translate to as "Sperm".
    1
  13443. Cooperation is better between the nations than confrontation.
    1
  13444. puchy110 I am glad to hear your view. I just hope the Japanese can be as open minded as you. As far as I know, China has never once invaded Japan (although the opposite is true) since China has all the resources that Japan lacks. By relying heavily on US protection, Japan's army has become inadequate to deal with rising regional disputes. Imagine 50 years later and Japan's military is just as dependent on the US as it was 70 years ago, and China and S. Korea militaries are getting stronger each year. US military ultimately serves the interest of America only. If a war with China is too costly, US may choose not support Japan. The chance of a war between China and Japan is quite low. China wants resources that Japan does not have, but Japan has high technology and trade would be more beneficial than outright war.
    1
  13445. puchy110 I agree and hopefully China does not decide to follow the path of Japan during WW2. China has already extended peaceful talks with ASEAN over these issues. The problem is, the US is also sending destroyers into those waters, as well as surveillance planes which are provoking to China and may jeopardize the talks.
    1
  13446. +puchy110 But if US has a contingency plan, then why is it sending destroyers, surveillance planes and even stealth bombers into that region? China has a big navy, but so far, no Chinese warship has been reported entering the South China Sea region. In fact, the only military assets deployed there belong to the US.
    1
  13447. +puchy110 The US has its own agenda here in Asia. US has been selling arms to Philippines, Vietnam and India in an attempt to surround and contain China's growth. Why does US object to a peaceful rise of China? What does it have at stake in East Asia? Also, surveillance planes and stealth bombers aren't ships that take a long time to arrive. Sending stealth bombers into Chinese airspace is only going to end up provoking China.
    1
  13448. +puchy110 Yeah, I don't envy Taiwan's current position. I suppose it could try for a "one-country, three-systems" sort of ruling, but I also doubt that would work. China tolerates Hong Kong because it is small and has no army, but Taiwan is a full fledged country with an army.
    1
  13449. +SJKCC Anyone can see that Korea today is shadow of former self compared 1000 years ago. Half of Korea's land and resources are locked up in North Korea and South Korea has only 2/3 whole population of Korea. Also, China's land and population has greatly expanded beyond Sui dynasty long ago. What makes you think Korea capability is still what it was 1000 years ago? Even non-Chinese agree that it's highly unlikely S. Korea is going to win against China.
    1
  13450. +인효빈 According to your source, Youtube is "blocked" in China, but it does not say anything about Youtube being "banned" in China. So why you claim Chinese government banned Youtube?
    1
  13451. +인효빈 There is big difference between "blocked" and "banned" here, so who is the baby here that can't even distinguish between simple words?
    1
  13452. Tyrone Rips Up Cats Kang In my opinion, Korean language sounds like bad case of diarrhoea and flushing toilet. And President Trump has repeatedly stated in his public addresses, that China's cooperation is essential to containing the North Korean missile crisis, so it is unlikely that he wants to nuke China at all. Otherwise, American would have to start manufacturing their own goods at expensive prices, due to their higher wages.
    1
  13453. Tibetans, like other Chinese minority also not subjected to One-Child policy. Only Han Chinese in cities get that.
    1
  13454. Nathan Jones CPC may have made mistakes in the past but they have learnt from it and now China is much better.
    1
  13455. Nathan Jones If Chinese people want political reform, they must get first get elected into local congress, then they rise through the ranks of CPC until they eventually become president or obtain some other high ranking post. This way, people can be sure the candidate knows the political system inside out.
    1
  13456. Nathan Jones Lot's of other countries have one party system. If you look at S. Korea, Taiwan and Singapore, one party had power most of the time and this allows them to implement policies that benefit the country long-term. Our system is quite similar to those system. 1.3 billion people voting may not be the best idea. Not all of them know what is politics and what is the best for the country. In the US election, 2 million can already skew the votes so imagine the effect with China's 1.3 billion population. The whole country could fracture like the Soviet union.
    1
  13457. +Nathan Jones Owlman Chan is right. In China, you can't change the government, but the policies can change according to what the CPC feel is the best for China. The CPC is the exact same party that went through Mao's policies that resulted in disaster. As a result, the CPC changed its policy to include capitalism and China's economy has improved greatly as a result. It is better to be pragmatic and change if an ideology doesn't work, then to be stubborn and ignore the ideology's flaws. China is no longer communist, but neither is it democratic. It changes its system to suit China's needs.
    1
  13458. Nathan Jones​ Maybe its because the comment that started this thread is very offensive to Chinese people, especially if you don't know Chinese political history.
    1
  13459. Nathan Jones Not every country is governed the same way. Your country's political system is different from other countries' like the US. So China's governing system is different as well.
    1
  13460. Nathan Jones China's political system is just not democracy then. Shouldn't people be open to alternative methods of governance? Governing methods change over the years. Colonialism was once acceptable in the 18th century but is now considered severely outdated.
    1
  13461. Nathan Jones​ Not everyone votes but those that do vote have at least dedicated a good amount of time to studying China's political situation and have the competence to vote responsibly. It's just different system is all.
    1
  13462. Nathan Jones No, what I'm saying is that politics is not children's game. You have to be responsible if you want to vote for the nation. Can't anyhow vote, or do protest votes (null votes) and end up screwing up the system. The CPC accepts people from all backgrounds. Farmers, herders, industry workers, educated people, people who been overseas and minority ethnic groups. To rise you have to gain support from majority of these people and these are people that are committed to improving China. Total CCP membership is over 85 million. It's a different system and I won't say that it is perfect but so far, it has worked for China. I agree that you can't represent all 1.3 billion people but the system instead focuses on willing groups who vote responsibly for the nation.
    1
  13463. Kory Toombs As far as I know, PRC has nukes and ROC doesn't, so Owlman Chan assumed that you meant China was going to nuke Taiwan to retake it. What were you trying to say then?
    1
  13464. Kory Toombs But does PRC want to be democratic? The ROC already has difficulty balancing DPP and KMT parties with its population and it will have to handle an additional 1.3 billion people in the mainland.
    1
  13465.  Vapor Tight Bunghole  No. Look at Trump blaming China, blaming WHO, blaming medical workers for "backdoor" pilfering of medical supplies. He's blaming everyone but himself.
    1
  13466. +Norwegian733 The same with China during the Sino-Vietnamese war. China fought from city to city up to Hanoi but withdrew because it was to prove a point that the Soviets couldn't effectively send aid to Vietnam. China had also promised not to use its navy in the war. China did not win in Korean war and neither did the Allies as it ended in a ceasefire. Technically, N.Korea and S.Korea are still at war up to today. There was no true "home" advantage as the US had turned Japan into a repair and refueling station that is more accessible than mainland China. As for casualty statistics, it was China and N.Korea versus Allies (US, UK, Turkey, Australia, Canada, France...etc). China was not a powerhouse then but it already proved that it could force a stalemate with so many other countries.
    1
  13467. Taiwan president is using Trump to start war with China. Trump is also looking for reason to go to war with China over lost jobs in US so they use Taiwan as an excuse. This is not looking good for peace in Asia.
    1
  13468. US has biggest military spending it the world. It has to acquire some "return on investment" from such a big expenditure if you know what I mean.
    1
  13469. If USA has 78,000 troops in the region, and N. Korea's missiles can't reach US mainland, then why not withdraw those forces from East Asia instead? Trump has promised to reduce USA military spending in NATO, so why not reduce military spending in East Asia as well? Furthermore, N. Korean citizens only support Kim Jong Um, because Kim uses USA as propaganda for the citizen focus of anger. By withdrawing US troops, Kim no longer has an outlet for N. Korean's anger, and they will turn on him instead.
    1
  13470. Trump realizes that presidents have great power over domestic issues like banning refugees and so on. But international issues are on a whole new level.
    1
  13471. Western society was built on backs of African slavery, genocide of natives, occupation of their lands and exploitation of other country's resource. Sciences, astronomy and mathematics all originated in Asia, but Westerners only record "white" people as the true intellectuals. Technology like gunpowder, paper, compass etc originated in East Asia but Westerners have claimed them as their own and use them against Asians and Africans. Westerner's resources don't come from own lands, they are plundered from occupied territories and through coloniaiisation of Africa, America, Australia and Asia.
    1
  13472. +Kevin C Most Western media tend to portray negative aspects of China and ignore the positive things.
    1
  13473. Chris Read Tibet actually improved under China. Tibet is mountainous, inaccessible region, so Chinese built a railway to allow easier access to the region. The old Dalai Lama practices serfdom which Chinese abolished because it also included horrible punishments such as cutting off hands.
    1
  13474. Hopefully China and US can both come to a mutually beneficial trade agreement.
    1
  13475. +Donald Kasper China will negotiate if you give her a chance. China and US are each other's biggest trade partners and cutting off trade will only hurt each other's economies. True, China's products are getting more expensive which is why China is expanding other sectors by investing in places like Pakistan and South Africa. Why would the Chinese government have short tempers and want to go nuclear when they signed a no-first-use policy for nuclear weapons? US is the one who refuses to sign it. China is not North Korea.
    1
  13476. Blue Tsunami That is between Hong Kong and the CCP. What has it got to do with the US?
    1
  13477. China Uncensored is not a good source of information on China. The best information source is from the locals or CCTV news or others news like BBC etc... A good, relatively unbiased channel would be Chanel News Asia in Singapore.
    1
  13478. Trump has been to China and Taiwan many times as businessman and knows that cooperation would be better than confrontation between China and US.
    1
  13479. Anderson A. The disadvantage of democracy is that it creates division among the government. US has been greatly divided by the Trump election, with mass protest, airports obstruction and people refusing to obey his orders. China may had some bad leaders and good leaders but ultimately, people follow the government enough to allow it to carry out reforms to turn China into its current status. Division among the people is serious in a country with that population size and could result in collapse like Soviet Union.
    1
  13480. +Najmah Chant You could use Google translate or learn some Chinese ^^
    1
  13481. +Ggg Gg China invaded itself?
    1
  13482. ***** I think you need to study more Chinese history first.
    1
  13483. ***** Most of China's historical invasions occurred when China was under Mongolians or Manchu rule. Han Chinese are mostly peaceful and uninterested in conquest.
    1
  13484. +Ggg Gg You can look at maps of China during Yuan Dynasty (Mongolian) and Qing Dynasty (Manchu) and compare them to maps of dynasties under Han Chinese like Song and Ming Dynasties.
    1
  13485. Lets hope the talks between President Trump and President Xi will proceed smoothly and result in policies mutually beneficial to both parties. Indeed, American will prioritize its own interest first and so will China, so hopefully we can reach a middle ground that is acceptable for all parties. Cooperation between our countries is always better than confrontation.
    1
  13486. Actually, North Korea only threatens US military bases in South Korea, Okinawa Japan and Guam. Where is China's involvement in this conflict between NK and USA at all? USA withdrawing its forces from the above territories would do more to reduce tensions in Korean peninsula than anything China does.
    1
  13487. Chinese also do not broadcast their military technologies to the world. That's why no one knows what it's true capabilities are.
    1
  13488. Shirghazay Cowboys You have no proof of that. Why cover up weapons technology if people have nothing to be afraid of?
    1
  13489. As a spoken language, most words have only 1 or 2 syllables (sounds) so you can cram lots of words into a certain sound limit (i.e. How many ideas can you express in a 8-syllable limit in English? You can probably squeeze in more words in Mandarin or Cantonese) As a written language, complex words occupy roughly the same space as simple words. So if you're getting a tattoo, the word " 智 " is more space efficient than "Wisdom" (although getting a tattoo is not wise!) Chengyu (成语) are 4-character idioms that compress an entire story into a few words. For example, 井底之蛙 means the frog at the bottom of a well, which refers to someone who ignorant of anything aside from the world of their own. However, in terms of writing speed, Chinese characters tend to suffer because of their complexity. For example, the Chinese word for police is 警察 which has 34 strokes in total, so yeah, it's a pain to write.
    1
  13490. If you want China exert economic leverage on N. Korea, then of course it would take time slowly implement, instead just slapping instant economic sanctions (like what Western powers do) and pushing the unstable state over the edge. Remember that this is nuclear-capable state, not like most Middle East countrys, and needs be handled gingerly.
    1
  13491. The US is a formidable force today but not forever. Rome was once power but it must fall someday. Ming Dynasty China was once a powerful country at one time but it fell to Qing Dynasty. True power does not last forever. China has been there before and is a living proof.
    1
  13492. +Eric T Exactly. Like what would happen if someday, someone created something better than democracy but is somehow against it? Like lets say, an ideology where you can elect your government but in return, you will have to obey him or her like a god? That goes against the principles of free speech but it allows the leader to carry out changes unhindered. Will the people embrace it willingly or resist it violently?
    1
  13493. Actually, Chinese government has been slowly withdrawing support from North Korea over the years. This issue actually only involves North Korea, South Korea and USA, not China. China can only provide neutral grounds for these countries to talk over and discuss their differences.
    1
  13494. Actually, China already planned ahead of time to punish North Korean missile testing, but held off until the meeting with President Trump. Then during the meeting, President Xi Jinping appeared "convinced" by President Trump and agree to put pressure N.K in return for better trade deals with USA. That could be a reason why the talks went smoothly. So now, North Korea thinks China is punishing them because of USA, and Trump thinks he managed to convince China of N. K threat and China gets better trade deals with USA. Furthermore, Trump did not mention anything about Taiwan or SCS issue, so this is a pretty sweet deal in my opinion ~😁😁
    1
  13495. James Russell China's formal claim was in 1947 and back then, Philippines, Vietnam etc did not protest at all. Then after a few years those countries began taking over territory and suddenly Western media paints China in demonic light for reclaiming those territories back
    1
  13496. James Russell The Western media hardly ever describes other countries activities in the area, such as Vietnamese building barracks, gun emplacements and airstrips that can launch military aircraft, long before China built its bases there. Regarding the current situation, China and the ASEAN countries have at least agreed to shelf the issue aside for the time being and focus on joint development instead.
    1
  13497. ShadowSlayer US invades existing islands instead of creating them.
    1
  13498. James Russell Native Hawaiians fought for independence from the Americans but lost. The other Pacific islands also had their own inhabitants.
    1
  13499. Arden B. There is nothing wrong USA no longer being world leader in 7 years, neither is there anything wrong with US dollar no longer being world currency. There will simply be new world leader and new world currency is all, and the world will go about its own business.
    1
  13500. United States actually has largest prison population in world, and apparently still growing. The prisons are already packed to full capacity, so their solution is put more offenders on probation, and less criminals go to jail because of space constraints.
    1
  13501. +Anthony Omega2 USA is invitation for criminals? Are you perhaps saying that America was originally haven for many criminal settlers, seeking refuge elsewhere, and that their descendants form bulk of US society today? Also what do you mean by saying "every crime done in USA are from immigrants or their descendants, unless you are a Native American"? What qualifies as Native American? Being a citizen before 9/11? Because you mentioned God later, I thought you are saying US prison incarceration rate somehow linked to religion or repentance and so on. Ordinary weapons like knife, bat, sticks etc still don't compare on same level as a firearm, even of smallest caliber. With guns, you can rob banks, kill people, threaten/force people (even rape at gunpoint) etc, at greater capability. Its also easier detect guns than for ordinary weapons, which could be anything. Passing a simple gun control law in US could do wonders to reduce number of high-end violent crime. But freedom is such that once people experience it, no way are they going to give up their right to bear arms.
    1
  13502. +Anthony Omega2 Some Americans may not take kindly to your comments about America being descended from mainly criminals. Its true USA has high prison population, but its due mainly to USA's policies, not their origins as a nation. Some Americans, like African and Asian Americans were brought there as slaves or worker immigrants too.
    1
  13503. Anthony Omega2 You said explicitly said "(not all immigrants)" in your 6th comments, that means you do not think all immigrants are criminals. Why do you outright deny what you just posted?
    1
  13504. +Anthony I don't understand, What is purpose of inserting "(not all immigrants)" in your comment then? Its from your 6th post, so why are you making it out like I said it myself? I only said "mainly" because you said "(not all immigrants)" so why you attribute everything to coming out of my mouth? Since now you said: "True, not all immigrants came to America seeking criminal intent. " that means you believe "MAJORITY" instead, which is why I used the word "Mainly" to reflect this.
    1
  13505. Trump got many business in China so going to war with China is no good for his family business.
    1
  13506. +Mewmewmew:3 Maybe South Koreans prefer America's solution to N. Korean problem instead? which is to send aircraft carrier strike group to Korean peninsula and possible trigger war here in east Asia.
    1
  13507. +Mewmewme:3 China has been always against North Korean missile testing. North Korea acquired its nuclear technology from Soviet Russia.
    1
  13508. +Mewmewmew:3 Chinese government is also against the companies that sell material to N. Korea. Furthermore, China makes lot of weapons for other countries like Pakistan and Iran. So it is quite possible that Pakistan or Iran chose to sell/supply N. Koreans with weapons made in China. Chinese government has no ability to interfere with the affairs of what Pakistan does with its scientists.
    1
  13509. +theylied1776 I have read your link, and although China's trade generally expanded with NK, China had "complied with United Nations sanctions and stopped buying North Korean coal, a major source of hard currency for Pyongyang." Also taken from the article are "(Chinese) imports of coal dropped 51.6 percent in the first three months of 2017." and "China had not imported any coal from North Korea since Beijing imposed a cutoff on Feb. 19". Depending on exact details that President Trump and Xi had discussed, China had still compiled with UN sanctions accordingly. It was also implied in the article that "some economists believed it possible for Chinese businesses to import coal on an off-the-books basis, using transactions that would not be recorded by customs officials...But since mid-February, Chinese coal traders have said that their business has virtually vanished." In other words, we adhered to what we promised, and discontinued importing coal from NK. President Trump only wanted "tougher sanctions by China on NK" and China delivered exactly that. The term "tougher sanctions" is subject to debate of course. Depriving NK of coal (a major source of income for NK) and sticking to the sanction, already satisfies the "tougher sanctions" condition.
    1
  13510. +theylied1776 Where in the article does it say two weeks? According to article, "China has not imported any coal from North Korea since Beijing imposed a cutoff in Feb 19" That means the government's coal sanctions are still in effect, even till today. How is that not considered honoring our agreements? If the sanctions don't work, then it's not China's fault when we upheld our end of the bargain. Did China promised that the sanctions will work? No. But we agreed to impose tougher sanctions on NK and we delivered exactly that, and not just only for two weeks too.
    1
  13511. edition.cnn.com/2017/02/19/asia/china-coal-north-korea-ban/index.html According to above source: "China says it will halt all coal imports from North Korea, starting Sunday and FOR THE REST OF 2017, amid growing tensions on the Korean Peninsula following Pyongyang's most recent missile test last week." That means China's coal sanctions still in effect
    1
  13512. You asked for single article and I delivered exactly that, just like China. President Trump asked for "tougher sanctions on NK" and China's coal sanctions are still in place until end of this year.
    1
  13513. theylied1776 China agreed to "tougher sanctions" and that's what we given. China did not promise that the sanctions will work. Other types of trade may increase, but China still sanctions coal until the end of the year as the government said.
    1
  13514. Every political leader phrase their wording carefully so that media can't twist it for own purpose. What matters most is that there is agreement by both sides and no outright confrontation.
    1
  13515. ***** China's new world order does not necessarily mean that China wants to be number one. China just wants to play a bigger role in the world and be allowed to defend its sovereignty. China is no longer like what it was 40 years ago.
    1
  13516. ***** The CCP is the same party that brought China up from a war-torn country to a modern economic power and potential rival to the US in only 40 years. Not many countries can achieve such a similar feat.
    1
  13517. ***** Good for Germany then. But the standards are getting higher as the years pass. Is Germany a possible match for the US today? CCP had to raise China into its modern status from the so called "shet hole" that you described so I believe that it's an incredible achievement for a non-Western country.
    1
  13518. ***** You didn't have to be so rude. How is the world going to hell when US and China have an agreement and are on at least talking terms now? Only fear mongers see bad things when the two countries are making up. I never said China was perfect. There's still room for development but it is a lot better than it was 40 years ago.
    1
  13519. ***** China is no longer fully communist but neither is it democratic. China follows its own system of government. So far it has worked so why do you insist that China is evil? Must every nation follow democracy?
    1
  13520. ***** You are rude person. Of course democracy and communism have advantages and disadvantages. It is just ideology. A good government would adopt the system to suit the country's needs,which is how society progresses. There is no such thing as a perfect form of governance.
    1
  13521. *****​ You actually sound depressed here. What's wrong with China and US working together instead of fighting. Cooperation is better than confrontation of any sorts. I've studied both Chinese history and recent world history so what is wrong way of thinking? You are welcome to disagree with me but there's no need to insult people. This is just my opinion thats all.
    1
  13522. +Lee Sk John. East and West Germany and North and South Vietnam were fortunate that they united earlier. The people now identify themselves as Germans and Vietnamese. Unfortunately, North and South Koreans have been separate so long that they see themselves more as different peoples the more the division goes on. Same goes for China and Taiwan.
    1
  13523. Lee Sk John Indeed. Much of Taiwan progress is during KMT leadership. It may have some corruption and so on, but at least it is experienced.
    1
  13524. +Joe Burns China doesn't let bad relations affect trade. China's biggest training partners after the US are Japan, S Korea and Taiwan.
    1
  13525. Joe Burns China retake because it has historical claim to those islands. China and ASEAN countries have agreed to shelf the issue aside and focus on economic growth instead.
    1
  13526. China don't want war too. Young people die and China has seen many deaths since long ago.
    1
  13527. BrianYYH The PLA does not control the CPC. China's government now is more socialist and its economy is more capitalist. As for N Korea, China supports denuclearization of N Korea.
    1
  13528. BrianYYH  DPRK's nuclear threats are usually directed towards US bases in S Korea, Japan, Okinawa etc. If US pulls out these bases from the region, US saves military troops lives and equipment and DPRK maybe more willing to talk about denuclearization.
    1
  13529. BrianYYH What I’m saying is US will prevent a war with N. Korea by pulling those military bases out of S.Korea and Japan. US stands a better chance of successful negotiation with N. Korea if they show US forces leaving those places. US can just start first with base removal in S.Korea, then get N. Korea to agree to denuclearization. Then follow up with Japan airbase and then you can get N. Korea to completely disarm. This will save on a war that will cost troops lives and equipment.   As for China pollution, CPC already knows it and is issuing fines to the companies responsible. It is those companies that do not follow anti-pollution law and illegally contribute more to pollution. CPC has also invested in renewable energy and is currently the world’s top renewable energy producer.   China has historical claim to the South China Seas and its dispute is with ASEAN, not the US. China is also not obstructing traffic flow in the region. Transport ships sail through those waters daily and commercial airplanes can still fly unmolested over the region to reach Japan and S.Korea. China and ASEAN countries have agreed to temporarily shelf the SCS disputes to focus instead on economic trade. Only the US is the one sending its warships into the region.
    1
  13530. Clement Yang Actually, Taiwan government KMT started killing Communists first and US prevented N Korea from unifying Korea. China only joined N Korea later because it was N Korea ally.
    1
  13531. +rr 22 But it was civil war and should not have foreign interference. UN recognised does not automatically mean that the Korean approve. Remember that Korea was united under Joseon dynasty and was divided into North (Soviets) and South (USA). Why was there division in first place?
    1
  13532. +rr 22 China and ASEAN countries have decided to shelf the problem aside temporarily and focus on other areas of interaction.
    1
  13533. +Clement Yang So that means KMT is justified in killing 10 000 communist members first during the Shanghai Massacre? Remember that KMT was corrupt and looks down on peasants at that time. +rr 22 The CPC is the same party that raised China from a war-torn country into a modern economic power that is potential rival to the US. It may be corrupted, but President Xi Jinping is taking steps to curb corruption. But the CPC is most efficient as there are few barriers to getting projects done. Its just a different political system is all.
    1
  13534. Nick Sanfilippo As teacher, you shouldn't be saying such disrespectful things to another Chinese. Chinese teachers are people to be respected and in turn, they show the respect to other people. You may have learnt Chinese language but you do not fully understand Chinese culture.
    1
  13535. Nick Sanfilippo As Chinese, what I can say is that the longer this division occurs, the more harmful for people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. If you look at other countries with historical divisions, like East and West Germany (after WW2), or North and South Vietnam, they were divided, but later reunified within 20-40 years. As such, new generation of people consider themselves fully German, or fully Vietnamese respectively, which is good for the people. If you look at countries that are still separated, like North and South Korea, the people are only going to drift further and further apart. Korea was once one whole country but after 70+ years of division, the new generations of people start seeing themselves as separate peoples, which is tragic. The same thing is happening in China and Taiwan. The separation will only harm future generations of Chinese.
    1
  13536. Nick Sanfilippo I agree with most of your points regarding Taiwan's history, but I would also like to point out that the Dutch also only controlled a small portion of Taiwan like the Chinese and Qing dynasty China was perhaps, the first to formally incorporate Taiwan as a prefecture of China. Taiwan's first inhabitants were indeed the aboriginals, but I would say Chinese culture greatly influenced them throughout the course of history. Japanese, Dutch and other countries also influenced their lives undeniably, but perhaps to a lesser degree. Singapore and Malaysia were never a part of Qing dynasty China, so the Chinese government does not claim what rightfully does not belong to China. PRC may not have contributed to Taiwan's nation building at all, but I could also say North and South Koreas were built by different Korean government, but in the end, they were still two halves of once unified Korea. Its the same with PRC and ROC, they were built by different governments but were once part of Qing dynasty China. You are correct in that the communists and KMT had little foreign intervention during Chinese civil war, except at the last crucial part, when the government was poised to reclaim Taiwan but were prevented from doing so by the sudden presence of US aircraft carriers. President Truman had ordered the US Navy into the straits of Taiwan, effectively preventing the unification of China. You call communists the red scourge, but bear in mind that Chinese people merely wanted the unification of China. I could also say the same for the Viet Cong (North Vietnamese) and North Koreans as well. These people were only fighting to unify a country that shouldn't have been divided in the first place.
    1
  13537. +Sung dae Han Indeed. Other than mainland China, there is Hong Kong and Taiwan. We may not get along but all of us consider ourselves to represent China and we do not allow politics to affect business. China's 5 biggest trading partners are USA ($512 billion) Hong Kong ($401 bil), Japan, S. Korea and Taiwan (198 bil).
    1
  13538. +Sung dae Han China had been fighting the Japanese since 1937, during 2nd Sino-Japanese war, about 5 years prior to the Japanese bombing of Pearl harbor. That means the Western powers (League of Nations) ignored Japanese aggression for 5 years and allowed Japan to claim more and more territory of China, only joining the war in 1942. So the USA wasn't really joining the war to help China, they were doing it because of Pearl Harbor. USA may have fought Japanese for 3 years with Chinese help (1942-1945) but China has been fighting Japanese forces for about 8 years (1937-1945) with 5 years without Allied help and 3 years with Allied force. Western media is only proud to portray themselves as saviors when China has been slowly weakening Japanese forces for years before they joined the war.
    1
  13539. Hanayo Please eat me China is not taunting its neighbors. China and the ASEAN countries have agreed to set aside the dispute for the moment and focus instead on joint developments that mutually benefit both parties
    1
  13540. +Troll Boss I agree that One China policy should be settled by PRC and ROC. But remember that Trump accepting the Taiwan phone call could indicate a possible change in policy as a president. American presidents have been observing this practice for 4 decades already.
    1
  13541. USA can afford sanction Russia before, but China is not Russia and is big trading partner with United States.
    1
  13542. Eric Logan Other countries also buy Chinese products like Australia, UK, Japan and so on. I don't know about Mexico's economy though.
    1
  13543. +Test Test US still has trade with Mexico, but introducing tariffs to Mexican goods may provoke trade war between US and Mexico. Trump’s treatment of Mexicans makes it too easy for China to acquire new allies. China’s development with South Africa is new, but China is expert at building infrastructure like roads, schools, electricity and plumbing which will benefit Africa eventually. China and US relations will depend a lot on TPP and what Trump chooses to do with it.
    1
  13544. Test Test China's development with Africa is only considered new with regards to only 30-50 years, not 100+ years like the Western presence in Africa. As for putting money into Africa, I was referring to Xi Jinping pledging $60 billion into South Africa. I can't say for sure what the Kenyan's or Ghana people think about Chinese investors, but this is from my own perspective. By TPP, I was only aware recently that Trump had cancelled the TPP. TPP excluded China but that did not mean that China could have joined in later.
    1
  13545. The N. Korean people currently believe that they are at war with USA, and they support Kim Jong Um because they are fearful of the US. So why not USA take initiative to withdraw its US troops from South Korea, Okinawa Japan and the rest of East Asia? That will destabilize Kim's support base and when the citizens see that USA is no longer threatening them (from N. Korean's citizen perspective) they will slowly start to turn on their leader.
    1
  13546. I know United Airlines has the legal authority to remove passengers, but they could have at least, stopped the man from boarding in first place, not while he is already seated. I don't know if they pick Asian minority group because they think Asian minority are more compliance or less likely to bring up a fuss, compared to other races, but doing that itself is seemingly racist.
    1
  13547.  @WreckItRolfe  That's exactly what I wrote.
    1
  13548. The authorities probably picked him because he was Asian and therefore, more compliant and less likely to kick up a fuss, but it appears they made a bad choice.
    1
  13549. Do people actually know how close the Diaoyu Islands are to Japan? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/07/Senkaku_Diaoyu_Tiaoyu_Islands.png
    1
  13550. InoueMasao But the territory is illegally occupied by the Japanese during WW2. After the war, they should have been returned to their rightful owners.
    1
  13551. +InourMasao Imperial Japan had designated the islands as part of Taiwan when Taiwan was under Japanese occupation. So after the surrender it should have been returned as part of Taiwan territory.
    1
  13552. InoueMasao I've already given you answer, why you keep calling them theories and dismissing them? Since you know the dates then why rely on me to search them? China at that period was still divided and undergoing Mao's reform. In the end, China has to look after its national territory sooner or later.
    1
  13553. InoueMasao Like I said that Japan had made the Senkaku islands part of Taiwan during WW2 1945 but you keep insisting on denying it and dismissing it as a theory. How do we know when is the exact date that the islands became part of Taiwan? It was only found out after the signing of the Treaty of San Francisco in 1951 that Japan had placed the islands under Taiwan. What is the exact date then? I only brought up China because you asked why China was divided. You are the one not appreciating my comments. Why do you need me to explain things to you when you prefer to read your Japanese textbooks?
    1
  13554. China's population should not be underestimated. The population of China is equivalent to the population of North America, South America, Australia, New Zealand, and all of Western Europe -- combined. We shall be our own allies.
    1
  13555. Leron Benari US has to liberate Chinese occupied land (maybe Japan) to achieve victory so China would do well to make full use of PLA to occupy territory. As for blockade, China grows all its food locally and makes about 80% of weapons. It is disadvantaged but not crippled. If it holds out long enough, support for the war might wane enough for US to withdraw. China needs to play defensive here.
    1
  13556. Shirghazay Cowboys That has always been China's way. In true war you need all the manpower you can get. Also, China one-child policy created gender imbalance so there are more men than women in China.
    1
  13557. Leron Benari But how will US reclaim lands without setting foot on it? China will use PLA to occupy territory.
    1
  13558. Leron Benari Yes but China will send PLA to occupy islands outside of China. (eg Japan, Okinawa etc) US needs to free these territory and can't do it without landing. US can bombard the islands but still need to set foot on it to free it. Of course US won't invade mainland like what they do during WW2 Japan mainland. I am talking about occupied territory outside of mainland.
    1
  13559. Leron Benari​​ That is if American can bring it's powerful navy over in time. It takes time to bring the fleet over and China has advantage of being close by. PLA also has cruise missiles that can be launched from the safety of the land. If China wants to invade it would use all available assets. But of course I don't support war. This is only hypothetical.
    1
  13560. +Tao Liu I agree that a big population requires better control over the people. Qing’s army consisted of poorly trained Han conscripts who resented Manchu rule and the British had vastly superior firearms, ships etc. However, modern PRC is much different from Qing dynasty. The PLA is trained, well-equiped modern army loyal to the CPC. China’s food source could be disrupted by war, which is why every country has emergency stockpile in case of war or disaster. China has been stockpiling rice, iron ore, barrels of oil and various other supplies. I mentioned 80% of weapons being manufactured indigenously not stockpiled, but I agree that it is not perfect and the shortfall would have to come out from allies like Pakistan. US can enforce a naval blockade, but China also does business with many other inland countries unless the US can enforce sanctions against it. Aircraft, ships and tanks take a long time to build, but China is known as the manufacturing hub of the world. China has entire manufacturing cities like Shenzhen that cater quite exclusively to building products. The CPC just needs an efficient organization of manpower to make full use of it. China also has experience in building infrastructure (which is why they build roads in Africa) so it depends on how well the US can disrupt the transport system. China’s navy is inferior, but it can make use of defensive outposts along the South China Sea as bases to support its navy and air force. Some bases have anti-aircraft gun emplacements and surface to air missiles. There are airstrips for military craft to land and refuel if needed. As for war support, I agree that it depends on how PRC’s actions are perceived. Another thing to note is that China and US economies are linked. Cutting economic ties with China would result in increased prices of products in the US, which would affect the normal livelihood of people each day. Under CPC, the whole Chinese population is ultilised for war, being assigned to factories, growing food etc. As for launching attacks, PRC’s best choice would be Taiwan. This is because PLA has already trained extensively in exercises involving an invasion of Taiwan, so it won’t take years to prepare. US may be able to send carriers to the region but I still believe the video is biased in favour of the US. Aircraft carriers are powerful, but they are vulnerable to things like a sneaky submarine torpedo or anti carrier missile. If I was a Chinese general, I would focus on sending submarines and bombers to take out the aircraft carriers because they represent the morale of the US. As for cruise missiles, China has many, many missiles pointed at Taiwan. It would be foolish to think that PRC invested so much money into these weapons without a reliable tracking system. I don’t claim to be a military expert. PRC may succeed in some areas and lose in other areas that I mentioned above. Strictly speaking, no video in Youtube will ever show PRC winning against the US because such an outcome is simply not acceptable by netizens and will only anger them and result in less views. In real life, mistakes can happen on both sides and ultimately, it depends on the number of victories and losses from both sides.
    1
  13561. +Tao Liu I brought up the Qing dynasty in order to compare it’s army with the PLA. PLA may not be as advanced as the US, but it is still a modern army, not WW2 era. I was focusing on PLA’s attributes like loyalty to CPC and so on, not on the numbers. The US air force and Navy are indeed massive, but remember they are limited by the time it takes to deploy them to the warzone. About 40% of US navy assets are deployed in Asia, while China has close to 100% of its navy ready. In the Gulf War, the Iraq Army had more combat experience than PLA but perhaps not more sophisticated equipment. The war in Kuwait was perhaps US last known successful war, but the next wars were not so successful strategically. The US Army is equipped with all the best and latest gear they can be stymied by lightly armed insurgents that fight with their hearts not with hardware in the battles following the Gulf War. In a war, trade is risky because of possible sabotage and China will seek alternatives to naval trade. You look down on Chinese infrastructure capability but China can build roads and railways if needed during war time. During WW2, the Chinese helped build roads like Ledo road that allow supplies to enter from the West because the naval routes were blocked off. China already has a railroad linking to Russia. Russia may choose to remain neutral to the war, but it has a history of supplying weapons to countries in conflict with the US. In a war of attrition, China has self-sufficiency in food production, emergency stockpiles, 80% home manufactured weapons and possible inflow of weapons from Russia. So how much more prepared can China get? Regarding China’s manufacturing, China not only manufactures low quality products but also technology like vehicles and high speed railway trains. China’s automotive industry churns out more vehicles than the US (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automotive_industry#By_country) and China has the most expansive and complex high speed railway in the world. China even has hi speed rail projects in the UK to help them connect the country together. As for global arms sales, they do not reflect a country’s ability to manufacture arms for itself during war. China’s airstrip is only one of many that are possibly being built. China can quickly establish more bases in the region if needed, as shown them overtaking other bases built by other nations in the region. They may not cover the whole sea, but the SAMs and gun emplacement provide strategic cover in that region to support China’s navy. PLA has been planning possible retaking of Taiwan for many years already. PLA has many training exercises simulating an invasion of Taiwan so I doubt it would take as long as a month to prepare. PRC knows time is of the essence in this war with the US. Examples like PRC landing only 2 brigades of troops are only speculation and we won’t know how capable PLA is on invading Taiwan and how much of its forces is it willing to deploy. PRC is capitalist, but during war, the whole country literally goes to war. Chinese has this saying that translates to “Can there be a home without a country?” Chinese people know what’s at stake if they allow the US to land on Chinese soil, as all their hard work building the nation will be destroyed. Sure, some may choose to escape, but CPC would be extremely harsh on them. You can look down on Chinese submarines, but they have shown the ability to stalk US carriers a number of times from the following sources. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/nov/13/20061113-121539-3317r/ http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/news/a18094/a-chinese-submarine-stalked-an-american-aircraft-carrier/ The submarines have demonstrated an ability to surface within torpedo range undetected from the carrier and its escorts. Sorry, but you can’t convince me that PRC’s 1000+ missiles pointed at Taiwan are all unreliable. Why would the PRC spend so much money on the missiles and train PLA in Taiwan retaking exercises if they weren’t going to deploy them at all? I’ve already said that no Youtube video will ever show China winning because nobody will think it will. In this video alone, there is hardly any reference to what China’s navy is doing. There is no point constantly telling me to refer to this video alone. You have to rely on other sources outside and make your own decision.
    1
  13562. +Tao Liu The Gulf war was fought by a coalition but this time US may not have the same allies. Japan, S.Korea and Taiwan are China’s biggest traders after the US. For NATO allies to support they would have to go by land, through the Iraq, Iran and possibly Russia. And I keep saying “modern” because it PLA is modern, no use denying it. 40% of US navy is based on size not tonnage. US navy tonnage is unequally distributed so why would it be a comparison? If you want to compare tonnage then you should look at the locations of the aircraft carriers in the world . Why can’t PLA be both conventional and guerrilla? PLA was formed from the Communist forces fighting the Japanese and made use of guerrilla tactics to defeat the Japanese. With its size, it doesn’t need to resort to guerrilla warfare, but that does not mean it won’t use it if needed. If you want to compare conventional warfare, then the Korean war would suffice. China and US and its allies were facing off in a conventional warfare and the US were stymied and unable to achieve complete victory. You still look down on Chinese infrastructural capacity and I had already given examples of China during WW2 had no naval trade because of Japanese navy, but still built roads to receive supplies from allies. Back then China’s infrastructure was poor but now it is among the most well-connected in the world so the roads and railroads now would be much better. China has great experience building railroads and is even helping South Africa with roads so why is China’s infrastructure building so looked down upon? So if China has poor harvest in one year, it would draw upon its stockpile. If the harvest was good, there is no need to take from the stockpile and if possible, it could even store the surplus. Why do you separate these two activities from each other when China can make use of both? After US bombings, China is not stupid and will also repair the broken infrastructure. In China alone there are many, many paths to destroy so even if one road is inaccessible, China could rely on other paths to transport supplies. Like it or not, China produce 80% of its arms locally and can even import arms through landlines from Russia. Like I said, Russia may not participate in the war, but even during WW2, the Soviets and Nazis traded with each other secretly so why won’t they do the same with China? And I’ve already said what has China’s arms exports got to do with being able to produce enough locally? The fact that nations buy the weapons already shows that they aren’t of low quality. And you underestimate Chinese island building. Why then is the world so alarmed at Chinese base building? Vietnam and Philippines had bases there long before China but China’s base building is the only one in the news. Is it because of the speed it was built? The SAM and gun emplacements are only there to support the PLA N strategically in the South China Sea. PLA N is still the main fighting force. PRC’s preparation of invasion of Taiwan should not be underestimated. It will take time but PRC leaders know time is of the essence here, with the US looming on the horizon. PRC doesn’t have many amphibious assaults vehicles because Taiwan is within range of its missiles so it would most likely use ballistic missiles to soften up targets. PRC may not even use a land invasion force and will only send the PLA through air or even by sea to occupy Taiwan once the defences are down. The US civilians can prepare for war, but will the entire population support the war? US has a history of losing wars because its civilians want out of the war. Stalking still means that the Chinese submarine was able to keep pace with the Carrier. The point is also whether the US ships were able to detect the submarine before it surfaced within torpedo range. Also, which submarine travels slowly while exposed to the surface during war time? Most Chinese like it when people look down on its military capabilities. This is because of according to Sun Zi’s Art of war, you should let the army think you are weak, and let arrogance be their downfall.
    1
  13563. Lu Kang holds the burden of peaceful relations between the US and China on his shoulders.
    1
  13564. According to Wikipedia: Economy of the United States United State's main import partners are: China: 21.5% Canada: 13.2% Mexico: 13.2% Japan: 5.9% Germany: 5.5% Where is Korea ranked in USA import market?
    1
  13565. I don't understand what do you mean by "They exports their own goods to China so their factories in China can make their own products." Why export goods out only to import them back again? Also from Wikipedia: Economy of the United States United State's main export partners are: Canada: 18.6% Mexico: 15.7% China: 7.7% Japan: 4.2% Where is correlation between exports to China and imports from China here? South Korea is 6th and Japan is 4th, but China is still 1st. So USA imports more products from China than they do for Japan and South Korea, unlike what some of these people claim otherwise.
    1
  13566. Vitamin C Why are you so low as to keep adding insults to your posts? I don't insult you at all in my posts. In the end, 21.5% still represents Chinese products imported into USA. Why care about which country deals with China at all? When you import from China, it is still Chinese product isn't it? Look at the Made in China or Product of China on those goods.
    1
  13567. +Vitamin C It still means it came from China isn't it? It has "Made in China" label attached to the product. You are the one constantly trying differentiate the small details. If the Samsung phone came from Vietnam, than it will have "Product of Vietnam" too, wouldn't it? Who said anything about Samsung being a Vietnamese or even Chinese company for that matter? Lastly, USA and Europe is not the biggest mobile phone market. According to Wikipedia: List of countries by number of mobile phones in use Number of Mobile Phones in country United States: 327,577,529 Germany: 107,000,000 United Kingdom: 83,100,000 France: 72,180,000 *Total for USA and Europe: 589,857,529 China: 1,321,930,000*
    1
  13568. 别理他。这种人就像只野狗吠叫。 ╮(︶▽︶)╭
    1
  13569. Golfgang Motzy Mozart Why you keep repeating your insults towards Chinese people?
    1
  13570. +Pahahaha Chopsticks were original invention by ancient Chinese since 6000 years ago. Japanese chopsticks usually are tapered and sharper at the tip (possibly more dangerous) as well as shorter than Chinese chopsticks. Korean chopsticks usually made of metal, which can be slippery, which is why they are flattened in shape. The metal also tends to be heavy on the fingers and wrist, not to mention that Korean chopsticks are even shorter than Japanese because of additional weight of metal.
    1
  13571. Korea today only shadow of its former glory. 1/2 of Korea's land and resources locked up in North Korea and inaccessible to South Korea. 1/3 of Korean population lives in N. Korea. Today, the north relies on China for trade, while the south relies on USA for defense. If cannot even unify own country, how can you even think of going to war with other countries?
    1
  13572. +한국 Encounter China is the world's 2nd largest economy, so who how can Netherlands even be considered more powerful a country than China, because of trade, cultural, political, financial network? Where is Netherlands in this list of world's largest banks (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks ) at all? In terms of culture, China has 2nd most number of world UNESCO heritage sites, only behind Italy (Rome) at number one (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Heritage_Site#Territorial_division ) So how does Netherlands have more culture than China? China is home to world's largest hi-speed railway network as well as world's fastest supercomputer, Sunway Taihu Light 神威·太湖之光. China is 3rd nation in the world, other than USA and Soviet Russia, to independently conduct "spacewalk" during Shenzhou-7 mission in 2008. We even landed our own lunar rover on the Moon in 2012, when it has been neglected by NASA for almost 40 years. So what do you Koreans even know about China at all?
    1
  13573. Chinese banks funded many infrastructure projects across the globe, including Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh and even in South Africa like Djibouti, Angola, Nigeria, etc. Chinese don't let bad relations affect our economic links with other countries and China's top trading partners in the world according to (worldstopexports.com/chinas-top-import-partners/ ) are USA, Hong Kong (if considered country), Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, etc. even when we have disputes with almost all of them. China has ghost towns yes, but the lack of people is mainly due to their rural locations. Slowly these cities are being filled up as the government offers incentives to entice people to come and live in these towns. Here is a list of 5 former ghost cities that have slowly become populated over the years. (vagabondjourney.com/5-chinese-ghost-cities-came-alive/ ) People like you have only a narrow and fixed view of China, assuming it to be static and unchanging, when in reality, China's environment is changing constantly and adapting to newer circumstances experienced in the 21st century.
    1
  13574. +김우성 Why resort to using racial slurs against Chinese people?
    1
  13575. The Koreans didn't even have any written history during Goguryeo period. Korean scholars have to consult Chinese archives of Goguryeo in order to find out more information about Goguryeo history. China has had more than 500 books published about Goguryeo's history, such as records of their government, their armies, etc. Korean claim that the name came from Goguryeo, automatically means that it belongs to them, when Goguryeo ended in 668 AD and Goryeo appeared only in 918 AD?
    1
  13576. +Ridgeway The map of Goguryeo encompasses Northeastern China and North Korea, so exactly how is Goguryeo considered South Korean Kingdom? Just Google "Goguryeo Map" and you can straightaway tell that it isn't a South Korean kingdom. South Korean Kingdoms would be Baekje and Silla, not Goguryeo. Lastly look at Korea today, divided in 1/2, with 1/3 population living in N. Korea. The North dependent on China for trade and the South dependent on US for defence. Korea today is not powerful and united as it once was thousand years ago. Anyone can obviously compare the past with present and see this.
    1
  13577. +Ridgeway We have evidence to support our statements, from the map of Goguryeo and historical records of Goguryeo written by ancient Chinese, about their government, their lifestyle, etc all long before Korea even conceived itself as a nation. Remains of walled towns, fortresses, palaces, tombs, and artifacts have been found in North Korea and Manchuria. Some ruins are also still visible in present-day China, for example at Wunü Mountain. Ji'an is also home to a large collection of Goguryeo era tombs, including what Chinese scholars consider to be the tombs of Gwanggaeto. Where is South Korea historical evidence to support its claim that Goguryeo is part of South Korea? Are there any historical ruins of Goguryeo located in South Korea? If not, how can South Koreans claim Goguryeo as part of their history?
    1
  13578. +Ridgway You mean all the Goguryeo ruins, fortresses, walled towns, tombs, etc being found on Chinese soil is all propaganda? Where is South Korea's archaeological evidence to claim Goguryeo is South Korean kingdom? The only link Koreans have is just Korea's name that's all, so how is that sufficient proof at all? Don't Koreans have any other proof, other than Korea's name that's all?
    1
  13579. +Ridgway You are also avoiding my comment on the lack of Goguryeo ruins in South Korea, or even the map of Goguryeo itself. What more evidence do you need? I already proven that Japanese regarded Goguryeo as separate from the other two of the so-called "Three Korean Kingdoms", but it is you refuse to wake up and see the mounting evidence against you. Look at Goguryeo's historical beginning in Northeast China, before spreading down south to Sillia and Baekje according to this video (youtube.com/watch?v=3viLPxGVc2M )
    1
  13580. +Ridgway I have also proven that Japan regarded Goguryeo as separate from "Three Korean Kingdoms", but it is you who continue ignore my statement. Even my video link (youtube.com/watch?v=3viLPxGVc2M ) showed Goguryeo's origins in Northeastern China, before they spread downwards towards Sillia and Baekje, so how is it even considered Korean kingdom at all? You said the same point 4 times but it failed to prove anything. Are their any Goguryeo ruins located in South Korea? No. Does the Goguryeo map encompass more territory from China or Korea? China. But people like you keep repeat the same old point 4 times again and again. You keep saying Korea is named after it, but it is not sufficient to prove that it belongs to Korea, when historical and archaeological evidence says otherwise.
    1
  13581. Why don't Koreans reunify their divided country first, instead constantly making fun of Chinese? 1/2 Korea relies on China for trade and other 1/2 relies on USA for protection. 1/3 of entire Korean population is starving in North Korea, so aren't there more pressing issues for Koreans?
    1
  13582. Turkey Wine Trump will want to do that, but he will first have to convince the MNCs that I mentioned in my previous post. Like I mentioned, MNCs are by the very nature, not bound to any one country. Trump will have to find ways to attract them to the US.
    1
  13583. Turkey Wine Why is China ripping you off? China makes cheap products like smartphone, computer, sneakers etc affordable so the cost of living is lower. Think of all the money people saved buying cheaper goods.
    1
  13584. Turkey Wine The government has raised the quality of Chinese products since then to ensure better safety. If not, many countries would have boycotted Chinese products long ago and China would never had gotten the economic development it enjoys today. The government was new to product quality control at that time and has slowly developed a better framework for product safety to ensure that Chinese goods can still be sold.
    1
  13585. Turkey Wine Actually, producing fake rice is more costly than producing real rice. All those fake food scares after the milk powder scandal were made by people wanting to capitalize on China's fake food scandal. So far, there have been no confirmed reports of fake rice poisoning cases, so its safe to conclude that it was a hoax. Different people have different expectations of working conditions. Chinese workers live close to the workplace and food and housing are provided. As for child laborers, China forbids children under 16 from working, but some families are so poor that children will want to work to make ends meet.
    1
  13586. I did mentioned he was a crazy leader, so why is USA trying to push him off the edge? Trump would indeed save the USA more money on maintenance and upkeep of military bases in those regions. As for South Korea, do you really think their army is insufficient to deal with N. Korea? Trump is focused on getting NATO to increase its expenditure to relief USA military costs, but why is he not doing the same for his Asian allies like Japan and S. Korea? Why not explore different options instead of sticking to the same method that does not seem to work?
    1
  13587. If nations do not try alternative methods or approach a problem differently, then they are bound to be stuck with the same results. Chinese government tried Soviet Communism once but the communist markets failed to take off. So Deng Xiaoping introduced market reforms and opened up our markets to capitalism and China has improved since. The important thing is to recognize when something just isn't working for you and to try something else instead. I do not follow American politics but one clear view is that Trump promises, but he may not deliver what he promised. Trump visited Asian and reaffirmed military cooperation with Shinzo Abe of Japan, not making Japan pay for USA defense. But Trump was extremely strict with Angela Merkel of Germany, insisting that they increase military spending on NATO. So there is political motives behind his promises. USA only follows those 3 options but hardly consider tactical withdrawal. Why not withdraw a few troops first then sit down and negotiate with N. Korea to abandon their nuclear program in return for more US troop withdrawal? This will save US military expenditure in the region and bring USA military out of range of N. Korea. It will also force N. Korean leader to find an alternative focus to vent its frustration on instead of the USA.
    1
  13588. +Mpower330csl That's why I mentioned that USA doesn't necessarily have to withdraw ALL its troops at once. USA could try withdrawing about 20-30% of its troops in the region, then promise N.K more withdrawal only if USA sees physical proof of N.K nuclear disarmament. This is part of bargaining process to encourage N. K to abandon its ambitions. If it fails, USA will at least have less military expenditure, forcing S. K to learn to defend themselves. Furthermore, do you really look down on S. K's military? They are consistently ranked among the top 10 militaries in the world. The Korean war should also be considered a civil war, ultimately to be decided by N. K and S. K themselves. Otherwise, is USA going to constantly keep propping up S. K's military its whole life? This is a chance for USA to reduce its own military expenditure in the region and to get S. K and Japan to increase their military spending. I understand many Americans are upset at NATO's over reliance on USA for military aid, so why not apply the same thing here in East Asia? North Korea's ambition is to reunify Korea, or perhaps open up its trade and it can't do that if there are US bases in S.K and that both USA and N. K are in a state of war.
    1
  13589. +Motoko Cheng Well you are entitled to your own opinion. Its true that our government controls the market, but if the government decides to open the market, it will be in a controlled release to reduce impact on local companies. World economy can be likened to a wild, untamed river. It can be beneficial but it also can be harmful to people. Our government carefully monitors and introduces policies to protect our local industries from being overwhelmed by external companies. Western governments have a free market so they are exposed to unpredictable conditions, which is why they are being flooded with Chinese goods. So, our government has kept the local companies booming, but is slowly releasing the valve to allow a more free market, but while still being under government protection. Its not a perfect system, but it has helped us in the past. Of course, the river analogy is overly simplified, but its the closest analogy I could think of. The slowdown is to cushion for a soft landing, not a hard landing like all those previous reports said.
    1
  13590. +Atmsk US has a history of invading countries for resources like oil. Maybe they want to capture a share of the resources in the area?
    1
  13591. +Haeternam That too. Still it shows that large numbers of low quality Allied tanks can still stand up to high quality Nazi tanks and you shouldn't underestimate numbers.
    1
  13592. I don't like Herodotus War history is never irrelevant, whether in ancient times or WW2 or modern times. That's why people study the history of war. That was internal dispute. Many PLA troops refused to obey orders at that time. This is an army that is united against foreign threats to stability and will defend their homes, not invade another country.
    1
  13593. I like how race, gender, violence natures, social deviancy, criminal statistics, US citizenship, and even political views, factor into whether someone will commit such crime. The list just keeps getting longer and longer.
    1
  13594. In the video, Chinese consists of both Mandarin and Cantonese Dialects, which are mutually unintelligible. There are many more dialects and other difficult languages such as Japanese, Korean and Vietnamese have roots in Chinese, meaning if they are difficult, then Chinese is even more difficult. Chinese words are short but tonal eg, Ma can mean mother, horse, scold or ant depending on its pronunciation. To English speakers, it can be very confusing
    1
  13595. China attacking TW would be a bad decision. China regards TW as a rebellious "brother". Attacking it will only demoralize its own Chinese troops while more dangerous threats (like Japan and S.Korea) will move into position to attack PRC. The ROC only wants to get rid of the CCP and wants to minimize losses to the Chinese people. Let them come to you instead. If lets say, PRC decides to invade Japan, will S.Korea and Taiwan send aid to Japan? S.Korea and Japan have bad history together and furthermore, N.Korea can help PRC against S.Korea. TW was once occupied by Japanese troops so is it still willing to send aid to Japan? Will the Japanese even trust the Taiwan Chinese forces that come help them? Remember that these countries are unified only by the U.S presence. Fragile alliances will crumble if you can exploit their weak bonds. Okay, seriously now, please do not start WW3 China! You should become best friends with these countries instead! Peace out!
    1
  13596. +sangram desai Our relationship with South East Asian countries are bilateral relations and do not concern India. China is building in Pakistan occupied Kasmir as part of CPEC. Since you support CPEC then why are you complaining? Pakistan will start repaying only once the project is complete and they can earn profit from the high traffic volume from the pipeline and railway tax.
    1
  13597. +skywalker jake. People's views do not necessary reflect what their government thinks, but sadly, I found that more Indians hate China as well as Chinese citizens.. Why? Chinese are merely businessmen and Chinese operations in POK are merely business. China doesn't claim POK as part of our territory and when we are finished with our projects, we will vacate that region and leave it for whomsoever claims it. You're right, it's not just about the money, its about helping China build relations with other countries. Economic progress also improves relations between countries so its more than just a business transaction, we are building bonds between countries and linking them through trade.
    1
  13598. +skywalker jake. From my history about POK, Jammu and Kashmir was a princely state that was not originally part of either India or Pakistan. After the partitioning of India, J & K was reluctant to join either side and wanted to remain independent, but Pakistan invaded it. The leader was technically forced to either join India, or fend off the invaders on their own, so they joined India under pressure so that the Indian army will repel the intruders. But the "liberation" did not happen, which is why POK exists till today. POK has existed for almost 70 years (as old as Pakistan as a nation) and Indian government has made almost no attempt to claim POK for India. So how important is J & K to India? It is your territory by agreement, but India has not tried to reclaim it. This is just a brief summary of the history though. Like I mentioned, other regional neighbors have recognized the benefits CPEC has on Pakistan and the surrounding region. Afghanistan wants to play a role in CPEC (dawn(dot)com/news/1289978) and so does Iran (dawn(dot)com/news/1285404). China vetoing mashood is only at Pakistan's request and China doesn't really care about Mashood, but we do care about our relationship to Pakistan. Just like I mentioned China doesn't care about POK or claiming POK as its own, we are just doing business there according to CPEC and when we are done, we will leave and the benefits of the infrastructure, pipelines and so on all go to the owner of the land, not China. In summary, most of India's problems with China lie with Pakistan. For China-India relationship to truly progress, India would have to mend its broken relations with Pakistan. Don't blame China for problems that have been occurring between Pakistan and India for decades. We are just trying to develop the region and don't really care about geo-politcial issues between other countries.
    1
  13599. +skywalker jake Of course, China also benefits from this deal. We are running a business here, not a charity. CPEC is also expected to boost China's economy through supplying of cement and steel, as well as Chinese engineers being sent over to construct the infrastructure. But like I said, the finished buildings and infrastructure belongs to the owner of the lands, which is currently held by Pakistan. China will have trade access to Gawadar port, but will have to pay Pakistan for the use of the railway, and Pakistan can generate profit through the high volume of traffic of goods. CPEC has risks from terrorism and sabotage no doubt, but it is a risk that both Pakistan and China (actually, more risky for China) are willing to take to lay the foundation for improved economic relations in the region. Iran and Afghan may or may not join CPEC, but if the lines and railroads are running smoothly and without terrorist incident, then sooner or later, they might want to get involved. If the CPEC becomes a vital artery of Pakistan, then their government may finally become more strict on their terrorist crackdowns, since now it involves their vital trade route. Like I said, vetoing and protecting the terrorist is a politically motivated move by China to support Pakistan. China is not well known for using veto on UN decisions as China has used the least number of vetos (11 times)as a permanent member of UN, compared to US (70+ times) and Russia (100+ times). Clearly, China doesn't really interfere in international politics, and mostly uses veto for Pakistan's sake. So it all boils down to the relationship between India and Pakistan. If India wants that terrorist, India should get on Pakistan's good side, so that Pakistan would give China the green light not to veto and so on. India and Pakistan's relations may have deeply frayed, but hopefully economic ties would mend the relation between India and Pakistan. It is not impossible, as Germany and Britain have long made up since WW2 and their economies are as strong as ever. China has also privately advised Pakistan to tone down its hostility against India and work together for mutual benefit. Anyway, like you said, we are just two random people. But at least, we should look towards the future. Pakistan is going to be our neighbor for a long time in the foreseeable future, so shouldn't we work together instead of cause instability to the region? How long will India and Pakistan continue to fight each other? CPEC at least is an attempt to improve trade and relations in the region and future generations of Pakistanis, Chinese and maybe even Indian people will benefit from the project.
    1
  13600. +skywalker jake I understand that, as allies of USA, India will follow Western mindset towards terrorism, which is to use force against force. But that only solve the problem temporarily, and soon, another organization like ISIS will take up the mantle against US and other nations once again. This is short term solution and forms endless cycle. Terrorism tend to take place in impoverished regions, so Chinese approach is different. We help develop the country infrastructure and economy first, helping to destroy the breeding ground for terrorism to grow from. That's why China has One Road, One Belt initiative, helping connect the poorer countries and CPEC is one of the first steps. Yes, Pakistan is taking a loan, and also the building materials and engineers come from China, stimulating China's business. But once the projects are complete, Pakistan will generate revenue through high volume of traffic of the railroads and pipeline, and slowly repay the loan. It may take many years like 10-30 years (my random estimate), but it will eventually be repaid. I've already gave many reasons for China's vetoing. It's Pakistan's idea, and China is uninterested in India-Pakistan politics and only interested in completing CPEC. I could also say that India has been harboring 14th Dalai Lama who is wanted by Chinese authorities since 1959. Talking to the Chinese government won't do India any good and India would have to take up this issue with Pakistan. And no, I'm not a Buddhist, I am atheist/agnostic but I follow the traditional Chinese culture like worshiping my grandparents and so on.
    1
  13601. +skywalker jake Regarding the international resolution to Philippines and China, it was conducted by Permanent Court of Arbitration, which is not an agency of UN so how can it be termed international? China reserves the right not to accept the court's resolution since it is not UN. I already said that China is only building on those disputed territory, but not claiming POK as part of China. Why repeat the same old points? It could have easily been Pakistani engineers instead of Chinese working and would it have made any difference? If India was so concerned about the Kashmir locals, then shouldn't India have liberated POK long ago instead of leaving it for about 70 years? (about as old as Pakistan) Its alright if you don't share Chinese views about terrorism but do you have to be so rude about it? USA has been trying to solve the problem of terrorism for decades to no avail, so why not try an alternative approach? When countries are linked together by railroad and trade, will terrorists be so radical as to destroy their own country's economy? Will the government of the country tolerate terrorists disrupting their own life artery? Terrorist recruit from poor and impoverish families to join in their ideologies. Increase economic trade and jobs will reduce the number of available people for terrorist to recruit, so yes, in a sense its all about money. Regarding Dalai Lama, Chinese government has been requesting his handover from India since 1959, but India has refused for 50 years, so now India complains when China vetos Azhar in 2016-2017? Why do some Indians only think of themselves only and that they are always right? Can't Indians see from a perspective outside of their own? How are they going to get along with neighbors in the future? Just because you don't share my same views doesn't mean you have to call my thinking delusional and so on. We won't know whether CPEC reducing terrorism works or not until it is complete in the future and unless we try, we will never get to the future.
    1
  13602. +sangram desai Its true that the leaders of terrorist groups may be educated, but its the poor desperate people that join these extremist organizations. Terrorist leaders promised their followers large sums of money to their families or inculcate extremists visions of the afterlife. Even in Europe and US, the extremists are people who are dissatisfied with the government or jobless or etc. So wouldn't improving economic progress of the country reduce the likelihood of people being recruited into extremism? Terrorist leaders don't blow themselves up, only their poor desperate followers do. If POK is Indian territory, then India should either negotiate with Pakistan or take it back by force years ago. India had about 70 years to reclaim POK from Pakistan but has not done so even till today and of course Pakistan will try ways and means of claiming ownership over what it sees as its territory. For example, why is Pakistan considered a thief when it shares the same history as India prior to the partition? It is not a thief stealing your valuables, it is your distant blood brother, who shares the same mother (British India) as India and is claiming territory based on that blood relation. As Chinese, we do not really care about India and Pakistan's enmity towards each other, as long as we can do business. Pakistan and India have a long historical feud that is impossible for China alone to fix, but we can at least develop economies and link countries by trade to reduce conflicts.
    1
  13603. +skywalker jake I don't know why you keep bringing up those same few points. Does China claim POK as its own? No. but we are there to build infrastructure according to CPEC so we have no choice but to be there to help Pakistan build it according to CPEC. The primary issue is still between Pakistan and India to settle. China is not the only selling weapons to Pakistan, USA has been selling weapons and missiles to Pakistan for decades, so why doesn't India complain to USA too? Since India recognize Pakistan as an independent state, then our interactions with Pakistan is a bilateral relation between sovereign countries. India also supported Bangladesh in its independence war from Pakistan, despite it primarily being a internal civil war fought within Pakistan. The Indian intelligence agency collaborated with Indian Army and began training a Bengali guerilla outfit called the Mukti Bahini. In international terms, this could be considered interfering in a civil war so that war was not really imposed upon India. The war resulted in Pakistan losing more of its territory which could be a reason why Pakistan saw India's involvement as a hostile act. As for the Dalai Lama winning a Nobel peace prize, Obama also won the prize, despite involving America in another war so whats the point of peace? The 14th Dalai Lama has already been exposed as working with CIA in separatists attempts from China (Wikipedia: CIA Tibetan program). Quoted from Wikipedia, the 14th Dalai Lama criticized the CIA for supporting the Tibetan independence movement "not because they cared about Tibetan independence, but as part of their worldwide efforts to destabilize all communist governments". The Dalai Lama also claimed that the CIA Tibetan program had been harmful for Tibet because it was primarily aimed at serving American interests, and "once the American policy toward China changed, they stopped their help" This is supported by the fact that once President Nixon visited China and opened China's market to the world, USA stopped caring about Tibetan independence. Today, USA as part of UN, recognises China's sovereignty over Tibet. Back to India and Pakistan. You have a right to defend India's view but what's wrong with looking at the views of other countries? How is India going to mend its relations with Pakistan if it constantly looks out for itself only? China may appear outward to chase money only, but at least we are contributing to build the world economy. Its alright if you say my views on terrorism are naive, but how else does India propose to solve the problem of terrorism? Using force like USA? Wasn't ISIS a product of wars in the Middle East?
    1
  13604. ***** I believe it was implemented in India for a while before being discontinued. India also has other population birth control methods like sterilisation and so on.
    1
  13605. +skywalker jake Well its sad that we can't come to an agreement. I agree that Chinese way of doing things is less democratic compared to India's, but things can get done faster our way. In India, whenever there is major project, the government needs to get consent of many people including those on the ground level, and so there will be a long delay, but in Chinese process it is faster because the government just proceed despite protests. Otherwise major projects like Three Gorges Dam would have taken very long time because of many factors. Its just our Chinese way. I'm glad that you also see USA as seemingly warlike and we need other countries to balance it on the global scene. I admit that China doesn't know as much about terrorism between India and Pakistan, but Pakistan has been cooperating with China on extremism in Xinjiang, so the exists a possibility that Pakistan could work with India on settling their terrorists issues. Majority of China and India issues lie with Pakistan, so improving relations with Pakistan would definitely improve China's relation with India. Anyway, I work as engineer in Shenzhen and I learnt most of my English from Hong Kong, so it follows British English instead of American or Australian English. Nice talking to you too.
    1
  13606. +skithedesert Doing whats right and whats popular can be very different. Look at Trump, being voted into power because he promise block Muslims entering USA, and building wall at Mexico border. Just because Trump got voted in, because he is popular (even when he lost popularity vote -_- ), does it means he is right? No. Politics should be more than just doing what is popular.
    1
  13607. Its not just USA that tend have anti-Chinese sentiments. When I visited Perth in Australia, there also anti-Chinese sentiments held by Australians. But even worst, if Chinese/Asian race is perceived as sexual fetish race by other people.
    1
  13608.  @Anonymous-df8it  Kinda like that. Except that many Chinese characters are more complex than the figure 8, so following the wrong stroke order can make Chinese characters look very weird.
    1
  13609. +Tibor Malinsky Chinese Characters were derived from Oracle Bone Script long ago. They were initially carved into bone, but eventually people starting using brushes with ink to write them. You can google for pictures of Oracle Bone script to get an idea of what they looked like. New characters are formed by combining parts (called radicals) to form words with meaning. For example, papa, sounds like 巴巴(baba), Add father(父) on top and it becomes 爸爸 (bàba). Uranium, sounds like 由(yóu) and is a metal (金) so it becomes 鈾(yóu). Florine sounds like 弗(fú) and is a gas (气) so the word is 氟 (fú). Second, you can use two characters to represent the meaning of a new word. Telephone is called 電話(Electric Voice) and Computer is called 電腦(Electric Brain). These are just some examples of how new words are created.
    1
  13610. +Tibor Malinsky Well, it depends on whether you want Chinese people to be able to recognize your new words or not. Other than that, you can make Chinese characters as complicated or as simple as you want.
    1
  13611. The population of China is equivalent to the combined population of the former Soviet Union, plus Pakistan, Afghanistan, Finland, Poland, Slovakia, Romania, and Hungary. Oh, and all of Southeast Asia, Japan, and both Koreas. Source: http://www.theatlantic.com/china/archive/2013/08/a-surprising-map-of-the-world-shows-just-how-big-chinas-population-is/278691/
    1
  13612. +Morgan Burt That is because China can afford to choose only the best out of 1.3 billion to form PLA. Furthermore, 1/3 of 1.3 billion already forms the largest army in world that can rival US and NATO. As rejecting recruits, this is a common problem faced by all the world's military, including the US.
    1
  13613. Morgan Burt That essentially the same as rejecting recruits either way. Only for different reasons. China has been recently lowering its standard too. Either way, PLA has large pool to choose from.
    1
  13614. +Solomon Sheckelstein Taiwan has long given up hope on reuniting with China. It now hopes more for independence.
    1
  13615. 你已经懂了汉语，为什么还说学日语难了？
    1
  13616. +Otto 那为什么学日语很难？你已经懂了三千多汉字。比那些没学过汉语的学生好。
    1
  13617. ***** China's most recent claim was in 1947, after Philippines independence in 1946. How is that considered hundreds of years ago? If Philippines has objections then why didn't they voice it out in 1947 when China made the claim? This only makes China look like bad guy here and the Western media is biased against China.
    1
  13618. kwazooplayingguardsman The 1947 claim is based on the older century map. so do you say it was claimed in 12th century, or in 1947? China has been making consistent claims throughout the years so which year do you want to be the official one? Like the others said, US did not ratify UNCLOS and French never had control over the Spratlys.
    1
  13619. Anjelica Parana The use of past maps is to simply solidify the foundation for China's claim in 1947, that's all. I can't possibly remember every historical map of China.
    1
  13620. The North Korean situation is still largely an issue between North Korea, South Korea and USA, not China. North Korea threatens USA bases in S. Korea, Okinawa Japan, and Guam, not China. What can the government do? Chase away all these US bases here? China can at most attempt to mediate talks between N.K, S.K and USA to arrive at a peaceful solution.
    1
  13621. +Pitch BLK Lets hope Trump doesn't flip again after he acknowledged the policy.
    1
  13622. Pitch BLK Yes, the sanctions imposed on Russia was because of Putin annexing Crimea. Its important to know why the sanctions were there in the first place.
    1
  13623. ***** China uses Simplified Chinese characters, not Traditional Chinese characters
    1
  13624. ***** Traditional Chinese is used for things like business signboards and Chinese calligraphy, not CPC members.
    1
  13625. ***** You mean the glory days of Mao Zedong? Mao was the one who introduced Simplified Chinese characters in an effort to improve literacy. Why would the CPC members use traditional Chinese then?
    1
  13626. ***** I think you have China confused with N Korea and Japan.
    1
  13627. +sykeo123 You know only things from biased Western Media. N.Korea's leader is way more fascist than Chinese President Xi Jinping. The suicide rate in Japan (and S.Korea) is much higher than that of China's (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate) Surprisingly, despite Japan's diverse adult industry, about 40% of Japanese are virgins, while Chinese are losing their virginity at much younger ages due to more liberal attitudes.
    1
  13628. ***** I never mentioned anything about China's economy or GDP or "strength". Why are you suddenly talking about this?
    1
  13629. ***** What propaganda have I said? You are the one saying things about China.
    1
  13630. ***** You are very rude person. I didn't even say anything like that about China and you jump to all these conclusions about me.
    1
  13631. ***** I am not so low and childish as to insult and judge people I know nothing about. The same thing applies to nations as well.
    1
  13632. ***** Nope. All I'm saying is that you need attitude adjustment before you want people to take your posts seriously.
    1
  13633. Trump is triggering global crises like Syria and North Korea, because he has failed with domestic policies back in America and is trying to divert attention away.
    1
  13634. ***** Chinese people have accepted Manchu and Mongol rule as part of China's history. Kublai Khan chose to abandon Mongol culture and call his empire Yuan dynasty of China. Chinese dress have also changed over the dynasties, like how Qing China dress (Qipao) is different from Han dynasty dress (Hanfu) so dress culture is not criterion for being Chinese. Modern Chinese wear Western clothing so it means we are Westerners? I also don't understand why are you are so rude to use derogatory terms and racist slurs against us.
    1
  13635. ohmytin I didn't assume you were American. I was just pointing out a possible move for the US. Maintaining military bases in other countries like in Japan and S. Korea is expensive, especially if the countries don't pay for the upkeep. China is working hard to raise the living standards of the remaining poor people. Building the bases is a way to safeguard China's economic future as billions of dollars flow through that region and most of it belongs to China.(Source:https://static.businessinsider.com/image/54e66f606bb3f77c0a018299/image.jpg)
    1
  13636. ohmytin China has been victim of Japan so it is unlikely that China will follow the path of Japan. You are taking my words and deliberately interpreting it wrongly.
    1
  13637. BuildersUS The conflicts in Iran and Afghanistan in the early 21st century are thought to be the most financially expensive wars in history, with a cost to the United States of $6 trillion. Most countries would not define China's market as a free market. The government controls what goes in and out of China to protect local companies. US and other countries may have contributed to China's growth, but it was done on Chinese terms.
    1
  13638. Mewmewmew:3 China is part of UN but maintains bilateral relations with N. Korea separately. China needs fuel and N. Korea is a supplier. China has no control over N . Korea nuclear program. China is against the companies supplying N. Korea with nukes. China sends defectors back as a sign of goodwill to N. Korea. Like I stated, China is working with S. Korea to a peaceful reunification of Korea.
    1
  13639. +Mewmewmew:3 China knows of this and is against the nuclearization of N.Korea. Chinese authorities are currently investigating into the matter. -Chinese embassy spokeswoman Fang Hong said Hongxiang Industrial Development Co was being investigated for "illegal behavior" and "economic crimes." -She said China had a "clear and consistent" position of opposing North Korea's development of nuclear weapons. -While China is North Korea's sole major ally, it disapproves of its nuclear and missile programs and was angered by its latest nuclear test. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-nuclear-usa-idUSKCN11W1SL I specifically mentioned in my second post that China is against the companies supplying N. Korea with nukes.
    1
  13640. Ancient Korea used to use Chinese characters (Hanja) but they found it too difficult so they came up with a new language (Hangul). Ancient Vietnamese also used Chinese characters in the past. Nowadays they aren't used at all but you can find ancient texts written in Chinese characters.
    1
  13641. The resources of the South China Sea rightfully belong to East Asian countries. Some will go to China, some to Japan, some to S.E countries but the US wants a piece of this delicious pie. US is the only non-claimant and wants to make China seem like the aggressor.
    1
  13642. +Claire AwesomeSauce I am giving you alternative view. Why else is there a territorial dispute over South China Sea? US has a history of invading countries for oil so why would US ignore the rich South China Sea? Why deploy more than half the US navy assets to that region? US has already send warships, surveillance planes and even stealth bombers. You call this a "mild" presence? China doesn't even have a single military ship there. China and Japan are great trading partners of each other so why would they want war with each other? China and Japan are competing for resources but the US is constantly interfering for what reason? Does it want a share of the bounty? There are so many other conflicts going on in the world and the US chooses to focus on Asia instead? What is the US real agenda here?
    1
  13643. But China, Japan and ASEAN countries are big trading partners of each other. Billions of dollars of trade flows through this region so why would they jeopardize it by starting a war? http://static.businessinsider.com/image/54e66f606bb3f77c0a018299/image.jpg The US has a history of inventing excuses to invade countries to steal resource. Like how Bush claimed Iraq harbored WMD and invaded it only to find no evidence of WMD. More than half of US navy assets have been deployed to South China Sea and planes like stealth bombers have been sent to the area. Is this region really that conflicted when so much trade flows through daily? Most likely the US wants to harness some of that regions resources for itself.
    1
  13644. Violentaye China never want to be number one in the world. China's main goal is peace and stability after many years of invasion, famine and revolution. China is not interested in spreading "communism" like the Soviets and the US with democracy. On the other hand, The US is constantly trying to be number one. Involved in Gulf war, Iraq War and even Afghan War. It then departs with resources and leave all the Middle East countries in a ruined mess. Please Trump, don't come to Asia and turn us into another Middle East. Asia is becoming more economically powerful and the US doesn't want it to rise so it keeps sending warships, aircraft carriers, submarines and bomber planes to that region. This is no way to "maintain peace" in that region.
    1
  13645. Violentaye Okay then one question: Why is Peace not attractive, lowers value of humanity and equated with being a pussy?
    1
  13646. +John henry Chinese people have working hours similar to Japan and Korea, maybe less so we are not slaves. China is also against N Korea nuclearization but trades to prevent a collapse of N Korea resulting in mass refugees to both China and S Korea.
    1
  13647. +Oliver Adkinson That's because of the one-China policy that's been in place for decades. Previous presidents respected that policy. The US is also sending warships and stealth bombers into the South China Sea to provoke China.
    1
  13648. Lion Dragon CPC doesn't always use violence to settle problems like it did before. CPC members have more freedom to criticize policies, as long as the criticisms are constructive and well-grounded.
    1
  13649. Hangul may be easier to learn but I heard that there more ambiguities generated with Hangul compared to Hanja (Chinese characters).
    1
  13650. South Korea and Taiwan may not be on good enough working terms with Japan to warrant joining in the conflict. They may choose to discretely send aid or choose to do nothing.
    1
  13651. +Kieran Jo Alright, you make a fair point, so I apologize for calling you shallow and naive. You happen to pop into the conversation at a bad time and I didn't give you any chance to discuss anything before bringing out the name-calling so... my bad. I only noticed once I read the backlog. I sort of reacted instinctively to your statement. The thing is, in my opinion, East Asia is a chess board with pieces scattered all over and poised to strike if anyone of them makes a move. N.Korea is poised to invade S.Korea, China can "legally" invade Taiwan, Japan has many old enemies, etc... As I said, having all of them join forces against China is a possible scenario but still unlikely in the event of war. China needs to make sure that scenario never happens if it goes to war.
    1
  13652. +Joe Burns China signed No-First-Use nuclear policy, so it will only use nukes if it were attacked with it first. If US got nuked by China, its because it launched the first nuke against China.
    1
  13653. Joe Burns China's last war was in 1979 and has been peaceful since for over 3 decades.
    1
  13654. 中国人曾经懂得受苦，但是美国人忘了什么是受苦。中美如果要打贸易战，就知道哪个国家能忍受。
    1
  13655. +Canadian Sikh If China was like Britain, then many people outside of China, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore will be speaking Chinese (Mandarin) as an official language like how English is today.
    1
  13656. +iheb ammar I agree with you. There is just too much going on in the world for any one country to play police to. The best of intentions can still result in the greatest harm.
    1
  13657. Veronica Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since Neolithic times (4th millennium BCE), while rest of world still wore loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas.
    1
  13658. Haha I feel the same way, just use the Hanyuan Pinying only. Ni hao ma? Hua wen shi hen rong yi de! Something like that
    1
  13659. +ChaosFireBit They should. But the Japanese signed the treaty after WW2 to give up all its occupied territories.
    1
  13660. Fart Inhaler China has historical claim to these territories 70 years ago. At that time, no other countries objected to Chinese control over these territories and only recently did the disputes over the sovereignty arise.
    1
  13661. Fart Inhaler Exactly. Without inhabitants, it would be fundamentally different from what Britain and US did to inhabited countries. China did not just assumed it was, they made a proclaimation and no other countries objected at that time. What do you mean historical claims mean nothing? China controlled that region even before the resources were discovered. China's handling may not be good but otherwise it will lose its historic claim. Vietnam was the first to built bases, barracks, gun emplacements and airstrips in the region so why is China being blamed for militarizing the region?
    1
  13662. Fart Inhaler If scientific evidence is insufficient then what would constitute hard evidence? Pieces of Chinese pottery found on those islands? Written reports by Chinese historians? Indeed, there was no interest in the region 60 years ago. China would prefer that there was no dispute today in that region. Fishing in the area was shared by all the neighbouring countries. But Philippine and Vietnamese coast guard began chasing away Chinese fishermen. Indonesian coast guard even illegally detained fishermen and blew their ships up. Why is China claiming the region 60 years ago considered in the same category as US colonisation of America and the British empire? This is considered relatively recent compared to those eras.
    1
  13663. "Terrorism" can be combated by military force, but it is only short term solution, and organisations like ISIS will pop up to resume the cycle of conflict. Only way to truly break terrorism in long term is to have economic prosperity.
    1
  13664. xD But the US and China are big trading partners with each other.
    1
  13665. Aaron Hoppitt China does not have huge import tax on US goods. The value of the tax depends on specific goods, but they are generally low and the same as those that US charges on Chinese goods. Lots of other countries have high tax on US goods. For example, in S.Korea, Iphone is extremely taxed because they want locals to buy Samsung (Korean brand). If you look at Japan and Korea car industry, they prefer home brands like Toyoda and Hyundai and there is hardly any US cars there because their governments tax US car imports. On the other hand. American car brands like Ford and General Motors sell well in China. Tax laws on imports are different in different countries. As for Apple being sued, I'm not an expert in China copyright laws but I know China's ones are different from the US. Apple got fined multiple times for tax evasion, poor worker conditions and illegally selling Chinese author books on online store. Remember that Apple is MNC doing aggressive competitive business in China and wants to cut cost and dominate Chinese market and may resort to underhand actions.
    1
  13666. @owen coleman And why are you commenting on my comments, only to verbally insult me? I don't resort to insulting you just because your views differ from mine. I have responded to your posts with logic and cited sources, but all you seem to do throw ad hominem attacks against me.
    1
  13667. The Infamous Vicious Phenom 74 War may be inevitable, but people have choice to choose peace instead. China too, has been involved in wars in the past, but we have been peaceful during the last 30 or so years. USA, even till 21st century, is still involved in wars across the globe.
    1
  13668. Chinese people don't want war, but we will fight back if you threaten our homes and loved ones.
    1
  13669. President Bush invaded Iraq on suspicion of WMD but found no proof. The UN Secretary General Kofi Ahnan actually said the war was illegal but Bush proceeded with invasion. US then cut off the country's head and left the place in a ruined mess afterwards. China will not let the same thing happen here. Through blood and sweat, Chinese people have turned this country from a poor, war-torn country into an economic power and we will not let US take it all away.
    1
  13670. ***** I believe people should at least make an effort to understand how other political systems are run before assuming that they are inferior.
    1
  13671. ntdonat Indeed. An interesting parallel to US capitalism is that Chinese economy is more capitalist than most capitalist countries, despite the government having communism in its name. It is good for political systems to learn from one another instead of proclaiming which one is better, like when Deng Xiaoping introduce capitalism to Chinese economy.
    1
  13672. I think you mean ancient Japanese is written from top to bottom, right to left so in a sense, yes it is read backwards. Manga books opens in the opposite direction from English books if you noticed.
    1
  13673. Taiwan risks creating WW3 if it declares independence. If Taiwan declares independence, China will have the excuse to "quell" a rebellious state. US, Japan, and S.Korea all observe 1-China policy so if they interfere, they will be breaking the policy and declaring war with China. If they remain neutral, they can still trade with the victor afterwards.
    1
  13674. China has also landed a rover on the Moon, when NASA has been neglecting it for about 30 years. China has also conducted independent spacewalks and constructed the largest radio telescope on the Earth. China also plans to put a man on the moon as well as reach the dark side of the Moon. Hopefully this might spur some friendly competition from NASA.
    1
  13675. Human Era sounds more scientific and unbiased than Before Christ and After Christ.
    1
  13676. ***** Are you going repeat same point? Why not blame USA instead when North Korea conquered 95% of Korea before US intervened? At least Korea will be united by Koreans themselves instead of by foreign power intervention. NK today developed nuclear weapons because it is still at war with USA. If US did not intervene in against NK, then NK today has no reason to acquire nukes and build more weapons. Korea would be unified, and not at war with any country.
    1
  13677. ***** Like I said, NK invest heavily in nuclear weapons because USA declare war against NK. Otherwise if USA did not intervene, Korea today will be unified by Koreans themselves and not at war with any country. The money spent on missile tests would instead go to other areas like economic growth. Today, nobody wants business with NK because it still at war with USA. How to normalise relations with rest of world? One moment you said not live in past, but you keep insulting my grandfather. Our soldiers died on our regional turf, Korean soldiers died protecting their land, but USA troops died on foreign soil in other country's internal civil war.
    1
  13678. ***** I answered with "Today, nobody wants business with NK because it still at war with USA. How to normalise relations with rest of world?" If you have nothing more to contribute then no point continuing this discussion. You only seem interested in insulting people and their grandparents. I do not insult you or your grandparents, wherever you came from.
    1
  13679. ***** Once again, you are only interested in insulting people's grandfathers. What about when N. Korea conquered 95% of Korea before US intervened in civil war? What about USSR creating NK and USA creating SK? Ultimately, N. Koreans are still Koreans whether like it or not. Half of Korea is prosperous but the other half isn't, so what is whole Korea's real situation? S. Koreans still have families in NK and same for N Koreans having relatives in the south. Why don't you blame the countries that divided Korea in first place and prevented its unification by Koreans themselves?
    1
  13680. ***** Is insult Chinese people all you know, until you ignore all other factors? Tell me which East Asian country in world is still war with USA? Would your company want do business with country still at war with USA? Of course not. In 2016, North Korea approached Washington to talk about signing peace treaty, but it failed. USA declared war with NK after NK conquered 95% of Korea. So if there's no USA intervention, then Korea will reunited. There be no need for huge military or nuclear weapons and companies will still set up business there since there is no looming US threat. Korea would be much different than it is today. And you still want blame China as sole reason for current state of Korea?
    1
  13681. +Pauly Love All day I am glad you found my post useful. Yes it is true that China usually drag our foot regarding imposing sanctions on NK, but the most recent plans were executed rather quickly, especially after the Trump-Xi meeting. It is possible that these initiatives were planned ahead, and executed at the precise moment when it would benefit China. The Chinese government knows we are slowly losing influence over NK, as previous NK leader, Kim Jung Il (current leader's father) was frequent visitor to China, but Kim Jung Un (current leader) has not visited China at all since coming into power. We need to do something to re-exert our influence, but we also mustn't appear too aggressive in our initiatives. So we disguise our approach, by making the plans coincide with after the US meeting, to deflect blame from China. From what Trump has said, it appears that China may have also benefited by the promise of better trade deals with USA. Timing is extremely important when implementing new policies. For example, Trump implementing the Muslim ban from Middle East countries met with fierce negative response from many people. However, if let's say Trump implement this policy only after a terrorist attack (whether in US or somewhere else) then maybe (just maybe) he could have gotten a better response, and possibly better support for his policy. It may be cold-hearted, but its the dirty part of politics. Trump implementing his policy at the wrong time could result in lesser support for it.
    1
  13682. If you compare Japanese to English then Hiragana is like lower-case alphabets ( a, b, c ... x, y, z). Basic form. Katakana is like upper-case alphabets (A, B, C ... X,Y,Z). For foreign words. And Kanji is all those symbols, emoticons, abbreviations; LOL, OMG, ;), &, $, ♂, etc So if you apply Japanese sentence structures to English you will get this: 2day, I met this HAWT ♀! & I was like (0_0)? OMG I'm so GONNA ask her 4 her phone #! LOL JKJK ;) Anyway, CYA L8R @ school V(^.^)V & peace out! Just a little joke guys, don't take it too seriously.
    1
  13683. +Joey Ouyang That's not a good name to use.
    1
  13684. The problem with the English alphabet is that they are based on "sounds". People can mispronounce and the whole word changes over time. For example, Dog was originally a subset of "hund" or hound and probably derived from French "dogue" or German "Dogge". Nowadays people spell it as dawg or doge(that dumb meme) so who knows what it will be in a few hundred years from now.
    1
  13685. If you are a hardcore learner, you can learn both. Try Hiragana and Katakana first which are simpler, then learn Chinese Characters and then finally Kanji which are harder. It's definitely easier when you know how the Kanji words are derived from Chinese characters.
    1
  13686. Kanji and Chinese Characters are visually indistinguishable (although Chinese has some simplified characters) However, the difference lies in how they are pronounced and used. For example in Chinese. 木 -> tree, 爫 -> represents a hand grasping. So 采 -> Pick up (Hand plucking grass/shrub) 采 is pronounced Cai in Mandarin. Vegetable is also called Cai so they denote using 艹 -> grass to form 菜 -> Vegetable Kanji also uses.菜 called sai (as in yasai). But because it is borrowed, the history of the word may not be taught. Here's another example 子 -> Child, 老 -> Old person So 孝 -> Filial (Old parent supported by Child) Add in 文 -> culture, we get 教 -> Teach (Elder talking to Child about Culture) Kanji uses the same characters with almost equal meanings. But the pronunciation is different Other words are very similar in pronunciation 失敗 -> Failure, Shibai (Mandarin), Shippai (Japanese) 電話 -> Telephone, Dianhua (Mand), Denwa (Jap) 準備 -> Prepare, Zhunbei (Mand), Junbi (Jap) Bottom line is that learning Chinese radicals (木,爫,子,艹,文) will help to understand why Kanji is written as it is. Suddenly the Kanji becomes less intimidating when you can see the links of its components. 
    1
  13687. Ah, you're comparing English and Spanish written and spoken forms I presume? Yes, the relationship is similar, but I think an English or Spanish person can still recognize whether a word is English or Spanish i.e. "complicated problem" and "problema complicado". Hanzi and Kanji forms are indistinguishable by themselves i.e.( 漢字 and 漢字, 失敗 and 失敗 and so on) Its probably because alphabetical systems are there to help you pronounce words in a certain language like C - A - T or わたし(watashi). Kanji and Hanzi do not follow alphabets like Hiragana and Katakana. So we will have to follow different rules for them.
    1
  13688. +tk42missing Comparing China to American and British is like comparing apple to orange. Why assume that Chinese will follow in same footstep as those countries? Our mindset and Western mindsets are fundamentally different. For example, religion in the West tends to be absolutes; You are either Christian or Muslim and will wage Crusade of Jihad to wipe each other out. But in China, many different religions coexist relatively peacefully together. Chinese can choose to follow Taoism, Buddhism, even Islam and Christianity or even mixed religion. China is even expected to have the world's largest Christian population by 2025, despite being officially atheist. Britain and American have reached such a state, because, in my own opinion, there is a lack of competition from other countries. Britain still has Germany to be its rival, but USA no longer has Soviet Union to keep it on its toes. NASA used to plan missions to the moon but has stopped for 40 years because of lack of funding, and also lack of Soviet competition. Hopefully China's recent moon landings will spur NASA back to plan more moon missions. +EvolutionismAnti-Science Lie Its extremely difficult to debunk the theory of evolution, since it has already been well-established. But WW2 examples of what Japanese did to us, and what German Nazis did to Jews is not what evolution is about. That is Fascism, the belief of racial superiority over other races, not evolution. It is only become evolution in the sense, if Japanese succeeded in wiping us Chinese off the face of the planet or if the Nazis managed to do the same thing to Jews. Otherwise, it is not evolution.
    1
  13689. It is clear that sanctions do not work on North Korea. Why continue impose sanctions, knowing that it wouldn't work? North Korea targets US military bases in South Korea and Okinawa Japan. If USA withdrew its troops and military hardware from East Asia it would do more to ease tensions along Korean peninsula, than any sanctions China could ever impose on N. Korea at all. If same method doesn't work after so many years, why not try a different approach instead?
    1
  13690. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  13691. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  13692. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  13693. Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  13694. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  13695. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China as stated in Republic of China's own constitution.
    1
  13696. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  13697. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  13698.  @johnssenli  Baerbock insists that China should stop supporting Russia, but China knows that if Russia collapses, then NATO will have China next in its sights.
    1
  13699.  @garam6555  You said: "taiwan has been more portuguese and dutch and japanese than it's ever been chinese. in the past." Taiwan's history has been inextricably linked to the mainland before the Portuguese, Dutch and Japanese even colonised Taiwan. Here's a brief history of Taiwan. Video: Brief History of Taiwan youtu.be/tXTZuZWTSPo?t=220
    1
  13700.  @garam6555  "神州 Shenzhou .. not many chinese on taiwan a hundred and fifty years ago," Taiwan in historic records -230 AD Wu Kingdom of Three Kingdoms Era China sent an experdition to a large island called Yizhou. -Early 7th Century, Sui Dynasty send expedition to Liuqiu Island -Traditional interpretation is that Yizhou, Liuqiu refer to Taiwan. Some argue it's Okinawa -By 9th Century, Han Chinese fishermen settled in Penghu Islands in the Taiwan Strait, close to Taiwan -1281 AD, Kublai Khan after failed Yuan Dynasty invasion of Japan, officially set up administration on the Penghu Islands ... https://youtu.be/tXTZuZWTSPo?t=304 You said: "most would agree that taiwanese could consider themselves quite independent by now" If Taiwan consider themselves quite independent, then why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there something preventing Taiwan from joining the UN?
    1
  13701.  @garam6555  "神州 Shenzhou yes, china's permanent membership (with veto)" The United Nations countries democratically voted to recognize People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 (PRC) as China in 1971 and to kick the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (ROC) out of the UN permanent membersship. The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the UN General Assembly Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The poll results were as follows: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting ... Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_2758 Since PRC won the vote with two-third majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971 and recognized the People's Republic of China (PRC) as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" from the United Nations. So the UN countries democratically voted to recognize PRC 🇨🇳 as China on the UN permanent members and kick the ROC 🇹🇼 out of the UN permanent membership.
    1
  13702.  @garam6555  "神州 Shenzhou you won't want to know the level of economic coercion involved in the 1971 vote," So you're claiming that there exists economic coercion in 1971 by China? At that time, China wasn't the economic juggernaut we today, China was still largely a dirt-poor agrarian country in 1971. Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms only came much later around 1978, so how could China exert economic coercion on the 1971 vote, you tell me? How does your timeline even make sense? I've shown that in 1971, the majority of UN countries democratically voted to recognize PRC 🇨🇳 as China in the UN permanent membership, and kick the ROC 🇹🇼 out of the UN.
    1
  13703.  @garam6555  "神州 Shenzhou "economic coercion' was a bit polite, is 'inducement' or 'bribary' better?, basically the cpc went around a lot of little countries with voting rights and promised them anything." But we are talking about back in 1971, and China wasn't the economic juggernaut we are today, we were still a poor agrarian country in during the 70s, so where does the CPC even find the money to "bribe" other nations to vote in favor of China?
    1
  13704.  @garam6555  "神州 Shenzhou you're myopic" How am I short sighted? You can't refute my points so you resort to hurling personal insults against me for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours? We're talking 1971 and at that time, China was not the economic juggernaut we are today, after Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms in 1979, so how could China afford to bribe the vote in 1971?
    1
  13705. Houthis are waging a war of attrition just like Russia.
    1
  13706. Actually, the government wanted to punish North Korean, because N. Korea launched missiles to coincide with 2017 9th BRICS summit hosted by China in Xiamen, presumably in defiance against Chinese government. Since president Trump already wants to impose sanctions on DPRK, then Chinese government will also make use of this golden opportunity to punish N. Korea missile testing defiance, under the guise of cooperating with USA. This way, president Trumps "thinks" he somehow managed coerced China, and Chinese government gets an excuse to punish DPRK for its behavior during BRICS summit. It's a case of two birds one stone or 一举两得 in Chinese.
    1
  13707. +Randy Rush Nobody force you to listen to me if you don't want to. Why do you comment at all if you are uninterested in what I have to say?
    1
  13708. @@USA11111 Because the U.S dollar is backed by nothing, and they can just print money with impunity.
    1
  13709.  @drmodestoesq  China signed No-First-Use treaty regarding nuclear weapons, meaning that we will not attack with nuclear weapons, unless we ourselves are attacked by nukes. Whereas USA signed no such treaty and can preemptively strike any country with nukes. So if a nuclear war were to begin, China won't be the one starting it.
    1
  13710.  Arabic Reja  What genocide regime? Isn't China currently the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people?
    1
  13711.  @cba4389  The Japanese surrender treaty in 1945 stated that Japan will relinquish all previously occupied territory that they took during the war, so how does China belong to Japan? Whereas Taiwan's constitution states that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. If Taiwan is truly an independent country, then why Taiwan cannot declare independence without serious consequences? Is there something controlling Taiwan and preventing them from amending their constitution?
    1
  13712.  @cba4389  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  13713.  Toma Rogers  About Capitalism versus Communism, it's no secret today that Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."
    1
  13714. Russia's goal is to oppose US hegemony, and it needs China as an ally against USA. So why Indians still believe Russia will side with India over China? What has India got to offer Russia?
    1
  13715. +Total War Fan You like Russia more than USA, but the important question here, is whether USA and Russia even want to support India by going against China, who is their biggest trading partner.
    1
  13716.  WatsAp☦️⑴⑵⑹⑼⑻⑻⑶⑵⑷⑶⑼  How come you have the same profile pic as Cyrus Jansen?
    1
  13717.  @peterchu8701  Why doesn't your comment appear properly on this post?
    1
  13718.  @DiogoJ1  There's such an intricate history between Russia and Ukraine, that reducing it to what you described doesn't do the Russo-Ukraine history justice. Even Putin himself said that Russians and Ukraines were originally one people if you trace their origins. When the USSR dissolved, formerly Russian territory like Crimea had found themselves part of Ukraine (because of lines drawn up by the Bolsheviks), so this is more than just an ex that can't resort to leaving the ex-wife alone. Furthermore, the ex-wife had been abusing her two children (Donetsk and Lugansk) for 8 years with violence, and Russia is putting an end to it.
    1
  13719.  @GenSec_Sauronych  Hey, why is it that your comment isn't showing up on my screen?
    1
  13720.  @GenSec_Sauronych  Alright. This time your comment does appear on my screen, and I agree fully with your sentiments. It's just kinda strange that your comment disappeared the first time round. Probably some censorship going on in YouTube.
    1
  13721. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it seems like the U.S is a threat to global peace and stability.
    1
  13722.  @MarkYeung1  But the United States vetoed the earlier UN Security Council resolution (proposed by Russia), calling for an immediate, durable and full ceasefire, and to stop attacks against civilians. Later the US also vetoed a Brazilian led UN resolution calling for ceasefire too.
    1
  13723. The timeline is the missing piece of contextual information that Western MSM just aren't including in their reports of Buca. The West just wants to jump to conclusions without even going through proper forensic and investigation to get to the bottom of the issue.
    1
  13724.  @rebelmango2141  The two republics, Donetsk and Lughansk (collectively known as Donbas) had been shelled by Kiev since the War in Donbas began in 2014, and for the past 8 years since 2022, some 14,000 people have been killed in Donbas region. Mind you, the people living there are supposed to be recognized Ukrainian citizens, yet they have been mercilessly targeted by Kiev for 8 years. Russia proposed the Minsk Agreements to mediate the situation, include a ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, release of prisoners of war, constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas and restoring control of the state border to the Ukrainian government. However, Ukraine did not uphold their end of the agreement, and continued shelling the Donbas region. After realizing that his words had fallen on deaf ears in the West for decades, Putin finally decided to act and he launched the special military operation in Ukraine to liberate the people in Donetsk and Lughansk.
    1
  13725.  @rebelmango2141  Because Boris Johnson arrived in Istanbul and scuttled the peace talks. Where did David Arakhamia ever said that nothing was signed?
    1
  13726.  @rebelmango2141  I've already shown you the interview where Putin showed the draft. Your only argument is to dismiss everything that I've said that's all.
    1
  13727.  @rebelmango2141  The NYT published the text of the draft peace agreement developed in the spring of 2022 by the Ukrainian and Russian delegations. The publication contains three documents: the draft agreement of April 15, which was handed over to Putin, the communique of March 28-30, and a translation of the draft agreement of March 17, which Kiev handed over to its Western partners. The first page of the contract dated April 15 and the appendix with a list of military equipment to it coincide with the document that Putin showed in June 2023.
    1
  13728.  @rebelmango2141  What does it matter if Putin or NYT publish the draft? Perhaps Putin wasn't at liberty to disclose the full contents of the draft between Russia and the Ukraine delegation? Yet the fact remains that I've given you proof, you've just continued to dismiss my proof that's all.
    1
  13729.  @rebelmango2141  Given part of the story? What's the entire story then? You yourself only choose to see half of the story from the Ukrainian side, while dismissing everything from the Russian side. Putin has stated that he considers Russians, Ukrainians and Belarussians as one people, namely the descendants of ancient Rus. And his words are true, because many Russians have family in Ukraine, just like many Ukrainians have family in Russia. Taken together, Ukrainian and Russian culture share far more similarities than differences. This whole conflict began with the 2014 Maidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) which ousted the Ukrainian President Yanukovych from power illegally, and installed a US pupet government in Ukraine, which then made plans for Ukraine to join NATO. NATO was formed initially in response to the Soviet Union's military might, but even after the USSR's dissolution in 1990s, NATO kept on expanding eastwards right up to Russia's doorstep. Russia will not tolerate Ukraine joining NATO, as it poses an existential crisis to Russia. (Much like the US did not tolerate Soviet missiles being deployed to Cuba in 1962.) Had Ukraine chosen to remain a neutral country, maintaining relations with both Russia and the West, then it's highly likely the conflict in Ukraine won't be happening today. But time and time again, Russia's concerns were ignored by the West, and after realizing that for decades his words had fallen on deaf ears in the West, Putin had no choice but to launch the special military operation.
    1
  13730.  @rebelmango2141  What's the West and Ukraine's narrative then? That Putin woke up one day and decided to invade Ukraine for no reason? Please give us the complete story then.
    1
  13731.  @rebelmango2141  What's the West and Ukraine's narrative then? That Putin woke up one day and decided to invade Ukraine for no reason?
    1
  13732.  @rebelmango2141  What's Ukraine's narrative then? That Putin woke up one day and decided out of the blue to invade Ukraine for no apparent reason? Please give us the complete story then.
    1
  13733.  @rebelmango2141  What's Ukraine's narrative then? That Putin woke up one day and decided to launch the special military operation for no apparent reason? Please give us the complete story.
    1
  13734.  @rebelmango2141  What's Ukraine's narrative then? Please give us the complete story according to your view.
    1
  13735.  @rebelmango2141  What's Ukraine's narrative then? That Putin woke up one day and decided for no reason to invade Ukraine? Please give us the complete story then.
    1
  13736.  @rebelmango2141  What's Ukraine's narrative? That Putin woke up one day and decided to invade Ukraine out of the blue? Please give us the complete story according to your view then.
    1
  13737.  @rebelmango2141  What's the West's narrative then? That Putin woke up one day and decided out of the blue to attack Ukraine? Please give us the complete story according to your view.
    1
  13738.  @rebelmango2141  What's Ukraine's narrative then? Putin woke up one day and decided out of the blue to attack Ukraine for no reason?
    1
  13739.  @rebelmango2141  So? Yanukovych was the democratically elected president of Ukraine, so he ought to make deals in Ukraine's interests. And had he not been ousted from power, then its highly likely Ukraine and Russia would still be on good terms today, since Ukraine won't be applying to join NATO.
    1
  13740.  @rebelmango2141  The pro-Maidan protestors chased the pro-Russian protestors into the Trade Unions House in Odessa, and then set fire to the building. 42 victims died in the fire while 200 were injured. And it was all orchestrated by the US in an attempt to remove Yanukovych from power illegally.
    1
  13741.  @rebelmango2141  Have you watched the documentary titled "Ukraine on Fire" by Oliver Stone? It helps explain the events of Euromaidan and how it's responsible for the conflict in Ukraine today.
    1
  13742.  @rebelmango2141  In that documentary, the Euromaidan protestors chased the pro Russian protestors into the Trade Unions House in Odessa, and then set fire to the building, resulting in 42 victims perishing in the fire. How's this a "right to protest"?
    1
  13743.  @rebelmango2141  In that documentary, the Euromaidan protestors chased the pro Russian protestors into the Trade Unions House in Odessa, and then set fire to the building. How's this a "right to protest"?
    1
  13744.  @rebelmango2141  Those protestors barricaded people in the trade union building and then set fire to it. How's this considered "the right to protest"?
    1
  13745.  @rebelmango2141  Those protestors barricaded people in the trade union building and then set it alight. How's this considered "the right to protest"?
    1
  13746.  @rebelmango2141  During the Maidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) the protestors blockaded people inside the Trade Unions house in Odessa, before setting it ablaze from outside and trapping the people inside. How's this considered "the people's right to protest"?
    1
  13747.  @rebelmango2141  During the Maidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) the protestors trapped people inside the Trade Unions house in Odessa, before setting it ablaze from outside.
    1
  13748.  @rebelmango2141  In that documentary, those protestors chased people inside the Trade Unions house in Odessa, before setting it ablaze from outside and trapping the people inside.
    1
  13749.  @rebelmango2141  The documentary goes over the details of the Maidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US). During one protest, the pro EU protestors chased the pro Russian people into the house of trade union in Odessa, before setting the building ablaze and trapping the people within.
    1
  13750.  @rebelmango2141  In that documentary, it covers WWII era Ukraine have Nazi collaborators and how the ideology hasn't been fully eradicated in Ukraine. The ideology has been capitalized by the US to create the Maidan Revolution, in which protestors chased people into the house of trade union in Odessa, before setting the building ablaze and trapping the people within.
    1
  13751.  @rebelmango2141  That documentary goes into detail about Ukrainian collaborators with Germany during WWII, and sowing the seeds of fascism in Ukraine. The ideology has been capitalized to create the Maidan Revolution in which people were trapped inside the trade house of unions in Odessa by arsonists.
    1
  13752.  @rebelmango2141  So they weren't "protestors" right? Therefore, the Maidan Revolution was an unlawful coup ousting Yanukovych.
    1
  13753.  @rebelmango2141  So they certainly weren't "protestors" right? Therefore, the Maidan Revolution was a coup ousting Ukrainian President Yanukovych and installing a US pupet in his place
    1
  13754.  @rebelmango2141  So they certainly weren't "protestors" right? Therefore, Euromaidan was an illegal coup.
    1
  13755.  @rebelmango2141  So they certainly weren't "protestors" right? Therefore, the ousting of Ukrainian President Yanukovych was illegal.
    1
  13756.  @rebelmango2141  So they certainly weren't "protestors" right? Then Euromaidan was illegal.
    1
  13757.  @rebelmango2141  So how can you call them "protestors"? They were armed combatants participating in overthrowing Yanukovych.
    1
  13758.  @rebelmango2141  Article 111 of the Ukrainian Constitution states that the President of Ukraine may be removed from office through impeachment procedure by the Ukraine parliament. Ukraine parliament voting results were 328 out of 450, which is 73%. What's needed is a three-quarters vote (i.e 338 votes) in Ukraine's parliament to convict the president and remove them from office. Therefore Yanukovych's removal from power was unconstitutional.
    1
  13759.  @rebelmango2141  Euromaidan was orchestrated by the US. We know this because of recordings of Victoria Nuland talking to Geoffrey Pyatt on who will be the next leader of Ukraine. The candidate they approved of ended up becoming the next Ukraine President so how can you claim that was no proof the US was involved?
    1
  13760.  @rebelmango2141  Recordings of Victoria Nuland talking to Geoffrey Pyatt on who will be the next leader of Ukraine. The candidate they approved of ended up becoming the next Ukraine President so how can you claim that was no proof the US was involved in the Maidan Revolution?
    1
  13761.  @rebelmango2141  Audio recordings of Victoria Nuland talking to Geoffrey Pyatt on who will be the next leader of Ukraine. The candidate they approved of ended up becoming the next Ukraine President so it's apparent that the Maidan Revolution was orchestrated.
    1
  13762.  @rebelmango2141  Putin is clearly well-versed in Russian and Ukrainian history. The territory that constitutes Ukraine today was historically part of many empires, including the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, the Austrian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Tsardom of Russia and of course, the Soviet Union. In fact, the name Ukraine is derived from the old Slavic term for 'borderland' as is the word krajina. Territories such as the Crimean oblast was historically part of Russia before it was transferred to Ukraine in 1954 to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine joining with Russia. Which part of Putin's history is wrong, you tell me?
    1
  13763.  @rebelmango2141  If the US considers Soviet missiles being deployed to Cuba as an existential threat, then why is it unfathomable to you that Russia would consider Ukraine joining NATO as an existential threat? It's no secret that NATO is there specifically to target Russia, so there's no way Russia will tolerate Ukraine joining NATO. For the same reason that the US didn't tolerate Soviet missiles being deployed to Cuba in 1962. Yet NATO has expanded eastwards into 13 countries, right up to Russia's doorstep and Russia's concerns of NATO expansion were never taken seriously by the West. After realizing for years that his words had fallen on deaf ears in the West, Putin finally had no choice but to launch the special military operation.
    1
  13764.  @rebelmango2141  Ukraine's parliament vote is just 328 which is 73% when what's needed is a three-quarters vote (i.e 338 votes). So the vote was short of 10 votes in order to remove Yanokovych from power.
    1
  13765.  @rebelmango2141  "any credible historians disagrees" Show me the real history of Ukraine and Russia then. At this point, you're just dismissing my points because you can't refute them. You yourself only choose to see half of the story from the Ukrainian side, while dismissing everything from the Russian side, then how can you claim to have the full story?
    1
  13766.  @rebelmango2141  "Crimea is technically Turkeys before Russia." See? Even you admit that Crimea was part of Russia before it was part of Ukraine. Also after a 1991 referendum with the Crimean authorities pushing for more independence from Ukraine and closer links with Russia, the Republic of Crimea was formed. But in 1995, the Crimea Republic was forcibly abolished by Ukraine with the Autonomous Republic of Crimea established firmly under Ukrainian authority. In 2014, following the events of Maidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) the people in Crimea wanted nothing to do with Kiev, so they held a referendum in which an overwhelming majority (96%) voted to join the Russian Federation.
    1
  13767.  @rebelmango2141  Can't I take Putin's word? I've fact checked his claims and historical dates, and found them to be accurate. You claim Putin's history is incorrect, but you cannot even furbish evidence, and even you admitted that Crimea was historically part of Russia before it was transferred to Ukraine, so how's that incorrect? If anything, it looks as though you're thoroughly determined to dismiss everything coming from Russia's side, then are you sure you can claim to have the complete story?
    1
  13768.  @rebelmango2141  Why can't Yanukovych run to Russia? You close one eye whenever there's US involvement during Euromaidan, yet you're faulting a democratically elected Ukrainian President for seeking safety in Russia?
    1
  13769.  @rebelmango2141  "I've refuted everything Russia's side is nonsense revisionism" Clearly you did not. Ukraine was historically part of Tsardom of Russia and also the Soviet Union, and Crimea was historically part of Russia before the USSR transferred it to Ukraine. Where have you refuted anything? And according to the 2014 Crimean Referendum, an overwhelming majority (96%) of Crimeans voted to join the Russian Federation.
    1
  13770.  @rebelmango2141  In the same way US will not tolerate Soviet missiles in Cuba, then Russia will not tolerate Ukraine joining NATO. And it's quite apparent that NATO is targeting Russia, then can't Russia respond to a hostile threat that's expanding towards it. In fact, Putin told Oliver Stone that he floated the possibility of Russia joining NATO to President Bill Clinton when he visited Moscow in 2000. Russia is part of the European culture after all and he couldn't imagine his own country being in isolation from Europe. In fact, Russia joining NATO would help EU countries balance against the US, and also remove the existential threat that NATO poses towards Russia. In fact, Putin made many statements that suggested he was favorable to the idea of Russia joining NATO.
    1
  13771.  @rebelmango2141  It was part of Turkey, but then after that it became part of Russia, so how is this refuting anything? Also the 2014 Crimean Referendum results indicate that an overwhelming majority (97%) of Crimeans voted to join the Russian Federation.
    1
  13772.  @rebelmango2141  "Because he lies and historians disagrees. It was historically part of Turkey before that." Again, how has it being historically part of Turkey change the fact that it became part of Russia later? It's apparent that you cannot refute his history, in fact you even admitted that Crimea was historically part of Russia. So why go on about only giving a half side of the story, when it's you who simply refuse to acknowledge the Russian side of the story?
    1
  13773.  @rebelmango2141  "Part of Ukraine was part of Tsardom Russia and they wanted to leave but the Soviets wouldn't allow them to." Show me which part of Ukraine was part of Tsardom Russia and where have they indicated that they wanted to leave?
    1
  13774.  @rebelmango2141  "Russia can't claim ownership when it wasn't theirs to begin with so they have as much claim as Ukraine" Actually Russia at first didn't really want to claim Crimea. When the USSR dissolved in 1991, Russia let go of Crimea and didn't do anything when Ukraine forcibly abolished the Crimea Republic and annexed Crimea to become part of Ukraine in 1995. Russia didn't claim Crimea for the next 23 years, until the 2014 Crimean Referendum results indicated that an overwhelming majority (97%) of Crimeans voted to join the Russian Federation.
    1
  13775.  @rebelmango2141  "How has it being historically Russia change the fact it became part of Ukraine." I never said it didn't became part of Ukraine. As I've stated previously, Crimea was transferred by the USSR to Ukraine in 1954. But you can't change the fact that Crimea was historically part of Russia before it became part of Ukraine.
    1
  13776.  @rebelmango2141  "Ukraine declared itself an independent republic within a federative Russia as early as March 1917, rather than in the wake of the October Revolution" So that's way before the Soviet Union was founded on 1922. And it's even before the October Revolution later in that same year, so how can you claim "but the Soviets wouldn't allow them to" when the Soviet Union wasn't even formed yet? In fact, the its autonomy was later recognized by the Russian Provisional Government.
    1
  13777.  @rebelmango2141  "Russia admit the referendum was rigged" But I though you dismiss everything coming out of Russia, now why are you claiming they admit it was rigged? Could you show me the statement made by Russia?
    1
  13778.  @rebelmango2141  "Okay? Irrelevant point historically it was part of Ukraine too." It was historically part of Russia too, as even you admitted, so what exactly have you refuted?
    1
  13779.  @rebelmango2141  Then what exactly are you refuting? Crimea was historically part of Russia before it was transferred to Ukraine in 1954. After 1991, Republic of Crimea was formed before it was abolished by Ukraine in 1995 and absorbed into Ukraine. And the 2014 Crimea Referendum has revealed that an overwhelming majority (97%) of Crimeans voted to join the Russian Federation.
    1
  13780.  @rebelmango2141  Where's the Russian statement that the Crimean Referendum was rigged? I mean, all this time you've been dismissing everything Russia says when it doesn't conform to your own view, but you suddenly claim that they claim the referendum was rigged? Where is this admission from Russia?
    1
  13781.  @rebelmango2141  So in 1991, Crimea declared itself independent, calling itself the Republic of Crimea. But Ukraine won't allow it and the republic was forcibly abolished and absorbed into Ukraine in 1995, then is that any different from Ukraine declaring itself an independent republic within a federative Russia as early as March 1917?
    1
  13782.  @rebelmango2141  "Girkin said a majority of the local administration, law enforcement and army were opposed to it." Where does Girkin get his info that a majority of the local administration, law enforcement and army were opposed to it?
    1
  13783.  @rebelmango2141  "Girkin stated that under his command, the rebels collecte deputies into the chambers, and had to forcibly drive the deputies to vote [o join Russia" He stated that the deputies were driven to vote, but he never said they had to vote to join Russia. That part was added into his words.
    1
  13784.  @rebelmango2141  Girkin served in the FSB for 18 years from 1996 to March 2013, but by the time of the 2014 Crimean Referendum he wasn't authorized to give public statements for Russia.
    1
  13785.  @rebelmango2141  Look, you wrote: "and had to forcibly drive the deputies to vote [o join Russia" but from the actual source interview, he only said that the deputies were forced to vote, but he never said they had to vote to join Russia. You used a bracket "[" because you took it off Wikipedia, in which the [to join Russia] part is added on, and it wasn't part of his actual words.
    1
  13786.  @rebelmango2141  So I take it that you've acknowledged that Ukraine was historically part of Russia during the Tsardom of Russia, and also the Soviet Union? And that Crimea was historically part of Russia before it was transferred by the USSR to Ukraine in 1954 to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia? Then how can you continue to claim Putin's history is wrong, when you've refuted nothing thus far?
    1
  13787.  @rebelmango2141  Also, Crimea is not the only one wanting to get away from Ukraine, but the two oblasts, Donetsk and Lughansk (collectively known as Donbas) had wanted nothing to do with Kiev anymore and started to declare themselves independent states. This led to the War in Donbas in which some 14,000 people in Donbas have been killed.
    1
  13788.  @rebelmango2141  Had Yanukovych remained in power in Ukraine, then it's highly likely that the Ukraine conflict won't be happening today. NATO poses an existential threat to Russia, and yet NATO has been expanding eastwards into 13 countries, right up to Russia's doorstep. Just like US won't tolerate Soviet missiles in Cuba, Russia too will not tolerate Ukraine joining NATO. But Russia's concerns on NATO expansion have been ignored by West until Putin found that he had no choice but to launch the special military operation.
    1
  13789.  @rebelmango2141  "That's called plausible deniability" I'm saying he never said they were forced to vote to join Russia. The part that says [to join Russia] is added to his sentence. Even when you took the text off Wikipedia, you didn't completely remove the bracket "[" so if anything, you clearly know that those weren't his actual words, they were added in.
    1
  13790.  @rebelmango2141  "He said it on Russian TV" Igor Girkin was debating Nikolai Starikov on NeuroMir TV, which is Russian alternative media, not the official Russian TV. Both speakers were allocated speaking time, and Girkin was answering Starikov's claims that 3 factors led to Crimea unification being successful, of which Starikov said that the Crimean law enforcement agencies supported unification. Girkin claimed only a few agencies were on the side of the citizens, most of them remain loyal to Kiev and thus were reluctant to participate in the referendum. Girkin said that the milita collected the deputies and brought them into the hall so that they could vote, but he never said that they were forced to vote to join Russia.
    1
  13791.  @rebelmango2141  "He said it on Russian TV" Igor Girkin said it on NeuroMir TV, which is Russian alternative media, not the official Russian TV. He was debating Nikolai Starikov and Girkin said that the militia collected the deputies and brought them into the hall so that they could vote, but he never said that they were forced to vote to join Russia. That last part [to join Russia] was added onto his words in Wikipedia.
    1
  13792.  @rebelmango2141  You said: "Again part of Ukraine and not willingly unless we're justifying imperialism and empire." So when in 1991 Crimea held a referendum to declare themselves independent and form the Republic of Crimea, but Ukraine did not allow it, and by 1995, the Republic of Crimea was abolished and absorbed into Ukraine, then aren't you justifying this as well? You said: "He claims Crimea is only Russia's and starts history when it's convenient" When did he ever said Crimea is only Russia's? He said Crimea was part of Russian history (and even you admitted to it) and since Turkiye is currently not claiming Crimea, then why can't he start the history at a relevant period? You saying Russia belongs to Mongolia but since Mongolia currently doesn't claim Russia, then what's the whole point of bringing it up when it's not relevant?
    1
  13793.  @rebelmango2141  You said: "Again part of Ukraine and not willingly unless we're justifying imperialism and empire." So when in 1991 Crimea held a referendum to declare themselves independent and form the Republic of Crimea, but Ukraine did not allow it, and by 1995, the Republic of Crimea was abolished and absorbed into Ukraine, then aren't you justifying this as well? You said: "He claims Crimea is only Russia's and starts history when it's convenient" When did he ever said Crimea is only Russia's? He said Crimea was part of Russian history (and even you admitted to it) but since Turkiye is currently not claiming Crimea, then what's the point of bringing up Crimea being part of Turkiye's history? You saying Russia belongs to Mongolia but since Mongolia currently doesn't claim Russia, then what's the whole point of bringing it up when it's not relevant?
    1
  13794.  @rebelmango2141  ​ You said: "Again part of Ukraine and not willingly unless we're justifying imperialism and empire." So when in 1991 Crimea held a referendum to declare themselves independent and form the Republic of Crimea, but Ukraine did not allow it, and by 1995, the Republic of Crimea was abolished and absorbed into Ukraine, then aren't you justifying this as well? You said: "He claims Crimea is only Russia's and starts history when it's convenient" When did he ever said Crimea is only Russia's? He said Crimea was part of Russian history (and even you admitted to it) but since Turkiye is currently not claiming Crimea, then what's the point of bringing up Turkiye?
    1
  13795.  @rebelmango2141  "Why do you think Putin is making historical arguments because he wants conquest" Russia is already the world's largest country in terms of land area. Russia literally have more land than they know what to do with. The reason Putin is making historical arguments is because Ukraine's and Russia's histories are intricately linked and is explaining the background relations that led to the situation today. Had he truly been interested in conquest, then why'd he wait until 2022 to launch the operation, instead of beginning in say 1991 when USSR was dissolved. Or why didn't he launch the operation in 2014 when the Maidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) ousted Yanukovych? Instead, Russia has continually called for Ukraine to settle the Donbas War peacefully, such as through the Minsk Agreements, calling for ceasefire and withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line? Yet Ukraine had renegaded on the Minsk Agreement and continued the War in Donbas.
    1
  13796.  @rebelmango2141  ​_"Why do you think Putin is making historical arguments because he wants conquest"_ Russia is already the world's largest country in terms of land area. Russia literally have more land than they know what to do with. The reason Putin is making historical arguments is because Ukraine's and Russia's histories are intricately linked and is explaining the background relations that led to the situation today. Had he truly been interested in conquest, then why'd he wait until 2022 to launch the operation, instead of beginning in 2014 when the Maidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) ousted Yanukovych? Instead, Russia has continually called for Ukraine to settle the Donbas War peacefully, such as through the Minsk Agreements, calling for ceasefire and withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line? Yet Ukraine had renegaded on the Minsk Agreement and continued the War in Donbas.
    1
  13797.  @rebelmango2141  ​_"Why do you think Putin is making historical arguments because he wants conquest"_ Russia is already the world's largest country in terms of land area. Russia literally have more land than they know what to do with. The reason Putin is making historical arguments is because Ukraine's and Russia's histories are intricately linked and is explaining the background relations that led to the situation today. Had he truly been interested in conquest, then why'd he wait until 2022 to launch the operation, instead of beginning in 2014 when the Maidan Revolution ousted Yanukovych? Instead, Russia has continually called for Ukraine to settle the Donbas War peacefully, such as through the Minsk Agreements, calling for ceasefire and withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line? Yet Ukraine had renegaded on the Minsk Agreement and continued the War in Donbas.
    1
  13798.  @rebelmango2141  ​_"Why do you think Putin is making historical arguments because he wants conquest"_ Russia is already the world's largest country in terms of land area. Russia literally have more land than they know what to do with. The reason Putin is making historical arguments is because Ukraine's and Russia's histories are intricately linked and is explaining the background relations that led to the situation today. Had he truly been interested in conquest, then why'd he wait until 2022 to launch the operation, instead of back in 2014? Instead, Russia has continually called for Ukraine to settle the Donbas War peacefully, such as through the Minsk Agreements, calling for ceasefire and withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line? Yet Ukraine had renegaded on the Minsk Agreement and continued the War in Donbas.
    1
  13799.  @rebelmango2141  ​_"Why do you think Putin is making historical arguments because he wants conquest"_ Russia is already the world's largest country in terms of land area. Russia literally have more land than they know what to do with. The reason Putin is making historical arguments is because Ukraine's and Russia's histories are intricately linked and is explaining the background relations that led to the situation today. Had he truly been interested in conquest, then why'd he wait until 2022 to launch the operation, instead of in 2014? Instead, Russia has continually called for Ukraine to settle the Donbas War peacefully, such as through the Minsk Agreements, calling for ceasefire and withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line? Yet Ukraine had renegaded on the Minsk Agreement and continued the War in Donbas.
    1
  13800.  @rebelmango2141  ​_"Why do you think Putin is making historical arguments because he wants conquest"_ Russia is already the world's largest country in terms of land area. Russia literally have more land than they know what to do with. The reason Putin is making historical arguments is because Ukraine's and Russia's histories are intricately linked and is explaining the background relations that led to the situation today. You really think Putin just woke up one day and decided on conquest?
    1
  13801.  @rebelmango2141  "Ukraine and Russia are different not the same as Putin claims" Not the country. Putin said that Ukrainians, Russians and Belarussians are the same people, being the descendants of ancient Rus. Many Ukrainians have family in Russia, just as many Russians have family in Ukraine. He's talking about the people, not the countries.
    1
  13802.  @rebelmango2141  "Check Putin's myths about Ukraine" It's an article written by Mikhail Zygar, who is a journalist, writer and filmmaker. But he's clearly NOT a historian, so what makes you think his article is reliable when talking about Ukrainian and Russian history? Why not get an actual Russian or Ukrainian historian to comment? I mean, didn't you say earlier that "Any historian disagrees with him" yet here you are quoting a journalist with an agenda? "or or Putin's warped idea of Russian history" This time it's an article by Olga Khvostunova, another journalist and NOT a historian, so how can you make the claim that "any credible historians disagrees" without even quoting an actual historian?
    1
  13803.  @rebelmango2141  "It's most likely Ukraine would have become a dictatorship the way Yanukovych was going for Russia similar to Belarus." Ukraine today isn't even a democracy for crying out loud. Zelensky's term as President of Ukraine has ended, yet why hasn't he called for fresh elections in Ukraine to choose a new President? Instead, Zelensky has abolished the opposition media in Ukraine and consolidated all TV platforms in Ukraine into one state broadcast. Talk about Yanukovych dictatorship, you already have an actual one in Ukraine (Meanwhile, Russia has successfully conducted its elections in March 2024.)
    1
  13804.  @rebelmango2141  "It's most likely Ukraine would have become a dictatorship the way Yanukovych was going.."_ Lol, Ukraine today isn't even a democracy for crying out loud. Zelensky's term as President of Ukraine has ended, yet why hasn't he called for fresh elections in Ukraine to choose a new President? Instead, Zelensky has abolished the opposition media in Ukraine and consolidated all TV platforms in Ukraine into one state broadcast. (Meanwhile, Russia has successfully conducted its elections in March 2024.)
    1
  13805.  @rebelmango2141  "It's most likely Ukraine would have become a dictatorship the way Yanukovych was going.." Ukraine today isn't even a democracy. Zelensky's term as president has ended, yet why hasn't he called for fresh elections in Ukraine to choose a new President? Instead, Zelensky has abolished the opposition media in Ukraine and consolidated all TV platforms in Ukraine into one state broadcast. Talking about a hypothetical Yanukovych dictatorship when there's an actual one in Ukraine at the moment! (Meanwhile, Russia has successfully conducted its elections in March 2024.)
    1
  13806.  @rebelmango2141  "The referendum was about restoration of the Crimean Autonomous SSR abolished in 1945 which Ukraine granted" After the Crimea autonomous republic was dissolved in 1945, Crimea became an oblast of the Russian SFSR. Crimea was then transferred to the Ukrainian SSR in 1954 to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia. So as Putin said, Crimea was historically part of Russia before it was transferred to Ukraine. You said: "Putin saying it's historically Russia is a blood and soil argument for imperialism in 1991." Russia didn't want Crimea in 1991. After the USSR dissolution and Ukrainian independence, the majority ethnic Russian Crimean peninsula was reorganized as the Republic of Crimea, after a 1991 referendum with the Crimean authorities pushing for more independence from Ukraine and closer links with Russia. In 1995 the Republic was forcibly abolished by Ukraine with the Autonomous Republic of Crimea established firmly under Ukrainian authority. So the "imperialism" in 1991 wasn't coming from Russia's side, it was coming from Ukraine's side. Source: History of Crimea (1991–2014) You said: "Russia recognized it as Russia also he ignores the Turkish part in his essay" Because the modern nation of Türkiye as they prefer now has only existed since 1920 and Crimea was part of the Ottoman Empire from 1441 to 1783. Also, since Turkiye currently doesn't claim Crimea then what's the point of bringing it up?
    1
  13807.  @rebelmango2141  "The referendum was about restoration of the Crimean Autonomous SSR abolished in 1945 which Ukraine granted" After the Crimea autonomous republic was dissolved in 1945, Crimea became an oblast of the Russian SFSR. Crimea was then transferred to the Ukrainian SSR in 1954 to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia. So as Putin said, Crimea was historically part of Russia before it was transferred to Ukraine. You said: "Putin saying it's historically Russia is a blood and soil argument for imperialism in 1991." Russia didn't want Crimea in 1991. After the USSR dissolution and Ukrainian independence, the majority ethnic Russian Crimean peninsula was reorganized as the Republic of Crimea, after a 1991 referendum with the Crimean authorities pushing for more independence from Ukraine and closer links with Russia. In 1995 the Republic was forcibly abolished by Ukraine with the Autonomous Republic of Crimea established firmly under Ukrainian authority. So the "imperialism" in 1991 wasn't coming from Russia's side, it was coming from Ukraine's side. You said: "Russia recognized it as Russia also he ignores the Turkish part in his essay" Because Tukiye currently doesn't claim Crimea, so what's the relevance of bringing it up?
    1
  13808.  @rebelmango2141  "The referendum was about restoration of the Crimean Autonomous SSR abolished in 1945 which Ukraine granted" After the Crimea autonomous republic was dissolved in 1945, Crimea became an oblast of the Russian SFSR. Crimea was then transferred to the Ukrainian SSR in 1954 to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia. So as Putin said, Crimea was historically part of Russia before it was transferred to Ukraine. You said: "Putin saying it's historically Russia is a blood and soil argument for imperialism in 1991." Firstly, Russia didn't want Crimea in 1991. After the USSR dissolution and Ukrainian independence, the majority ethnic Russian Crimean peninsula was reorganized as the Republic of Crimea, after a 1991 referendum with the Crimean authorities pushing for more independence from Ukraine and closer links with Russia. Secondly, it was Ukraine that wanted Crimea. In 1995 the Republic of Crimea was forcibly abolished by Ukraine with the Autonomous Republic of Crimea established firmly under Ukrainian authority. So isn't that imperialism on Ukraine's part, not Russia's? You said: "Russia recognized it as Russia also he ignores the Turkish part in his essay" Because Tukiye currently doesn't claim Crimea, so what's the relevance of bringing it up?
    1
  13809.  @rebelmango2141  "The referendum was about restoration of the Crimean Autonomous SSR abolished in 1945 which Ukraine granted and the Crimean parliament declared itself a constituent part of Ukraine so no." After the USSR dissolution and Ukrainian independence, the majority ethnic Russian Crimean peninsula was reorganized as the Republic of Crimea, after a 1991 referendum with the Crimean authorities pushing for more independence from Ukraine and closer links with Russia. In 1995 the Republic of Crimea was forcibly abolished by Ukraine with the Autonomous Republic of Crimea established firmly under Ukrainian authority. So isn't that imperialism on Ukraine's part, not Russia's? Source: History of Crimea (1991–2014) You said: "Russia recognized it as Russia also he ignores the Turkish part in his essay" Because Tukiye currently doesn't claim Crimea, so what's the relevance of bringing it up?
    1
  13810.  @rebelmango2141  After the Crimea autonomous republic was dissolved in 1945, Crimea became an oblast of the Russian SFSR. Crimea was then transferred to the Ukrainian SSR in 1954 to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia. So as Putin said, Crimea was historically part of Russia before it was transferred to Ukraine. You said: "Putin saying it's historically Russia is a blood and soil argument for imperialism in 1991." Firstly, Russia didn't want Crimea in 1991. After the USSR dissolution and Ukrainian independence, the majority ethnic Russian Crimean peninsula was reorganized as the Republic of Crimea, after a 1991 referendum with the Crimean authorities pushing for more independence from Ukraine and closer links with Russia. Secondly, it was Ukraine that wanted Crimea. In 1995 the Republic of Crimea was forcibly abolished by Ukraine with the Autonomous Republic of Crimea established firmly under Ukrainian authority. So isn't that imperialism on Ukraine's part, not Russia's? You said: "Russia recognized it as Russia also he ignores the Turkish part in his essay" Because Tukiye currently doesn't claim Crimea, so what's the relevance of bringing it up?
    1
  13811.  @rebelmango2141  You said: "Putin saying it's historically Russia is a blood and soil argument for imperialism in 1991." Firstly, Russia didn't want Crimea in 1991. After the USSR dissolution and Ukrainian independence, the majority ethnic Russian Crimean peninsula was reorganized as the Republic of Crimea, after a 1991 referendum with the Crimean authorities pushing for more independence from Ukraine and closer links with Russia. Secondly, it was Ukraine that wanted Crimea. In 1995 the Republic of Crimea was forcibly abolished by Ukraine with the Autonomous Republic of Crimea established firmly under Ukrainian authority. So isn't that imperialism on Ukraine's part, not Russia's? You said: "Russia recognized it as Russia also he ignores the Turkish part in his essay" Because Tukiye currently doesn't claim Crimea, so what's the relevance of bringing it up?
    1
  13812.  @rebelmango2141  "The referendum was about restoration of the Crimean Autonomous SSR abolished in 1945 which Ukraine granted and the Crimean parliament declared itself a constituent part of Ukraine so no." With the dissolution of the Soviet Union and Ukrainian independence the majority ethnic Russian Crimean peninsula was reorganized as the Republic of Crimea, after a 1991 referendum with the Crimean authorities pushing for more independence from Ukraine and closer links with Russia. In 1995 the Republic was forcibly abolished by Ukraine with the Autonomous Republic of Crimea established firmly under Ukrainian authority. - History of Crimea (1991–2014) you said: "Russia recognized it as Russia also he ignores the Turkish part in his essay" Because Tukiye currently doesn't claim Crimea, so what's the relevance of bringing it up?
    1
  13813.  @rebelmango2141  You said in an interview on 22 January 2015, but it wasn't an interview, it was a debate between Igor Girkin and Nikolai Starikov on Russian alternative media Neuromir TV, not the actual official Russian TV. And his words only said that the deputies were led to the voting booths, but he never said they had to vote [to join Russia]. That last part was added in at the end of his words, and even you tried unsuccessfully to remove the brackets, but you left behind a "[o" as evidence that you changed the text.
    1
  13814.  @rebelmango2141  "No Putin is doing it because he's an imperialist for a while now the year 800 has nothing to do with today." Had Putin been imperialist, then why'd he allow the War in Donbas to continue for 8 years since 2014? Why Putin tried to stop the fighting in Donbas through signing the Minsk Agreements which include a ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, release of prisoners of war, constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas and restoring control of the state border to the Ukrainian government? At the most, Putin was concerned with how ethnic Russians were being treated in Donbas. Funny how you claim the year 800 has nothing to do with today, yet you keep on harping on Putin for not mentioning the Turkish part in his essay. What has Turkiye even got to do with Crimea today?
    1
  13815.  @rebelmango2141  "No Putin is doing it because he's an imperialist for a while now the year 800 has nothing to do with today." Had he been imperialist, then why'd he allow the War in Donbas to continue for 8 years since 2014? Why Putin tried to stop the fighting in Donbas through signing the Minsk Agreements which include a ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, release of prisoners of war, constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas and restoring control of the state border to the Ukrainian government? Funny how you claim the year 800 has nothing to do with today, yet you keep on harping on Putin for not mentioning the Turkish part in his essay. What has Turkiye even got to do with Crimea today?
    1
  13816.  @rebelmango2141  "No Putin is doing it because he's an imperialist for a while now the year 800 has nothing to do with today." Russia is already the world's largest country in terms of land area and they have more land than they know what to do with, so what makes you think Putin is an imperialist? Had he been imperialist, then why'd he tried to stop the fighting in Donbas through signing the Minsk Agreements which include a ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, release of prisoners of war, etc? At the most, he was concerned with how ethnic Russians were being treated in Donbas. Funny how you claim the year 800 has nothing to do with today, yet you keep on harping on Putin for not mentioning the Turkish part in his essay. What has Turkiye even got to do with Crimea today?
    1
  13817.  @rebelmango2141  Russians, Ukrainians and Belarussians share much in common and are descendent from ancient Rus. Together, their people formed the state of Kievan Rus (of which modern day Kiev was the center). They have the same family not because they were forced into the USSR, but because Ukraine was already part of Tsardom of Russia before the Soviet Union was even formed. Also, the name Ukraine is derived from the old Slavic term for 'borderland' as is the word krajina. How can you say that there's barely anything in common between them?
    1
  13818.  @rebelmango2141  "The same reason as you thinking Putin is with the difference facts agree with him." Yes the historical facts agree with Putin, I'm glad you've admitted it. Crimea was historically part of Russia (and even you admitted it) and the oblast was transferred to Ukraine in 1954 to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia. The 2014 Crimean Referendum resulted in an overwhelming majority (97%) of Crimeans voting to join the Russian Federation.
    1
  13819.  @rebelmango2141  "It's war and under Ukrainian constitution they can be postponed kinda hard when they're occupied." That means Ukraine is currently not a democracy, since the President's term has ended and there's no call for fresh elections. Because Zelensky knows exactly how unpopular he is right now, and then calling for elections would be the end of his political career. And funny how you quote the Ukrainian constitution when it suits you, but ignore it when the vote to remove Yanukovych from power was 10 votes short of attaining the required three-quarters vote. You said: "Do you think Russian elections are fair with everything that's happening to the opposition" Apart from Putin, there were 3 other candidates on the ballot paper to vote for in the Russian elections. Also, Russia invited international observers from 36 countries (including 30 national parliaments, as well as 5 international organizations) to monitor Russia's presidential vote.
    1
  13820.  @rebelmango2141  That means Ukraine is currently not a democracy, since the Zelensky's term has ended and there's no call for fresh elections. Because he knows exactly how unpopular he is right now, and then calling for elections would be the end of his political career. And funny how you quote the Ukrainian constitution when it suits you, but ignore it when the vote to remove Yanukovych from power was 10 votes short of attaining the required three-quarters vote. You said: "Do you think Russian elections are fair with everything that's happening to the opposition" Apart from Putin, there were 3 other candidates on the ballot paper to vote for in the Russian elections. Also, Russia invited international observers from 36 countries (including 30 national parliaments, as well as 5 international organizations) to monitor Russia's
    1
  13821.  @rebelmango2141  Ukraine was never a democracy even before the war. The Economist Intelligence Unit assesses nations' democratic status in its annual Democracy Index and the 2021 index concluded that Ukraine was a "hybrid regime." Similarly, nonpartisan think tank Freedom House described Ukraine as a "hybrid or transitional regime" in its 2021 Nations in Transit report and gave the country a democracy percentage of 39.2 percent. And funny how you quote the Ukrainian constitution when it suits you, but ignore it when the vote to remove Yanukovych from power was 10 votes short of attaining the required three-quarters vote. You said: "Do you think Russian elections are fair with everything that's happening to the opposition" Apart from Putin, there were 3 other candidates on the ballot paper to vote for in the Russian elections. Also, Russia invited international observers from 36 countries (including 30 national parliaments, as well as 5 international organizations) to monitor Russia's
    1
  13822.  @rebelmango2141  Ukraine was never a democracy even before 2022. The Economist Intelligence Unit assesses nations' democratic status in its annual Democracy Index and the 2021 index concluded that Ukraine was a "hybrid regime." Similarly, nonpartisan think tank Freedom House described Ukraine as a "hybrid or transitional regime" in its 2021 Nations in Transit report. You said: "Do you think Russian elections are fair with everything that's happening to the opposition" Apart from Putin, there were 3 other candidates on the ballot paper to vote for in the Russian elections. Also, Russia invited international observers from 36 countries (including 30 national parliaments, as well as 5 international organizations) to monitor Russia's
    1
  13823.  @rebelmango2141  Putin is actually the more moderate one in the Russian government, there are more hardcore people calling for greater escalation. And regarding the peace talks in Istanbul, the Ukraine delegation claimed they could not negotiate while Russian soldiers were near Kiev, so Putin withdrew the forces surrounding Kiev as a gesture of goodwill, to create favorable conditions for talks. And you talk about Russia losing to Ukraine, when the 4 oblasts of Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporisa and Kherson have held referendums to join the Russian Federation? You said: "There was nothing happening to ethno Russians." Go and watch Patrick Lancaster, whose been filming the War in Donbas since 2014, and how can you claim there's nothing happening to ethnic Russians there? Pro Russian media outlets have been suppressed (and you still think Ukraine is a democracy) and even in 2017, a new Law on Education was passed which restricted the use of Russian as a language of instruction in Ukraine. The act is clearly aimed at eliminating the Russian language from as many spheres of community life in Ukraine as possible, especially from education and the media.
    1
  13824.  @rebelmango2141  Putin is actually the more moderate one in the Russian government, there are more far-right calling for greater escalation. And regarding the peace talks in Istanbul, the Ukraine delegation claimed they could not negotiate while Russian soldiers were near Kiev, so Putin withdrew the forces surrounding Kiev as a gesture of goodwill, to create favorable conditions for talks. And you talk about Russia losing to Ukraine, when the 4 oblasts of Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporisa and Kherson have held referendums to join the Russian Federation? You said: "There was nothing happening to ethno Russians." Go and watch Patrick Lancaster, whose been filming the War in Donbas since 2014, and how can you claim there's nothing happening to ethnic Russians there? Even in 2017, a new Law on Education was passed which restricted the use of Russian as a language of instruction in Ukraine. The act is clearly aimed at eliminating the Russian language from as many spheres of community life in Ukraine as possible, especially from education and the media.
    1
  13825.  @rebelmango2141  Had he been imperialist, then why'd he tried to stop the fighting in Donbas through signing the Minsk Agreements which include a ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, release of prisoners of war, etc? And regarding the peace talks in Istanbul, the Ukraine delegation claimed they could not negotiate while Russian soldiers were near Kiev, so Putin withdrew the forces surrounding Kiev as a gesture of goodwill, to create favorable conditions for talks. And you talk about Russia losing to Ukraine, when the 4 oblasts of Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporisa and Kherson have held referendums to join the Russian Federation? You said: "There was nothing happening to ethno Russians." Go and watch Patrick Lancaster, whose been filming the War in Donbas since 2014, and how can you claim there's nothing happening to ethnic Russians there?
    1
  13826.  @rebelmango2141  "That's just false again Crimean parliament recognized it as a constituent of Ukraine." It's true. The Crimean parliament voted to bring in a President (Yuriy Meshkov) in 1994, which the Kiev government denounced as unconstitutional. On 17 March 1995, the Ukrainian Parliament intervened in Crimea, scrapping the Crimean Constitution and removing Meshkov and scrapping the office of President for his actions against the state and promoting integration with Russia. Almost 4,000 Ukrainian soldiers and police officers were sent to Crimea. Meshkov was removed from power after Ukrainian special forces had entered his residence, disarmed his bodyguards and put him on a plane to Moscow. If anything, abolishing the Republic of Crimea was imperialism on Ukraine's part, not on Russia's.
    1
  13827.  @rebelmango2141  "You keep avoiding the question who sent him." Igor Girkin was on a debate with Nikolai Starikov on Russian alternative media Neuromir TV, who knows he could have gone to the debate himself. And you're clearly disingenuous, the part saying that they were forced to vote [to join Russia] was added on to the back of Girkin's words, and you forgot to remove the brackets completely, leaving behind "[o" as evidence that you changed the text.
    1
  13828.  @rebelmango2141  Look, this could all have been avoided if Ukraine simply made the formal declaration Not to join NATO. It's a non-defensive organization that have been involved in wars in the Middle East, and Russia has expressed concerns that NATO been expanding eastward into 13 countries right up to Russia's doorstep and posing an existential threat to Russia. Ukraine would have benefited greatly by remaining a neutral country balancing between Russia and the West, instead of throwing its lot in with the West and going against its next door neighbor.
    1
  13829.  @rebelmango2141  Igor Girkin said he was in charge of the only unit of Crimean militia, the Spetsnaz company which carried out combat missions, so what's the point of you asking me who sent him to Crimea? You said: "Yes because given the underlying context that's the logical conclusion." So now you're admitting its merely conclusion (more like supposition) then why'd you lied earlier claiming "Those were his actual words"? And if you didn't change anything, then how do you explain the "[o" that you left behind as evidence that you changed the original text? The original text had brackets around [to join Russia] added on to his words.
    1
  13830.  @rebelmango2141  "So the guy in question had a secret agenda and that's why Ukraine did it reasonable. No it's not imperialism" Yuriy Meshkov was the only elected president of the Republic of Crimea that was eventually disposed by Ukraine, how's that not imperialism? He secured victory in the second round of the 1994 Crimean presidential elections, with 72.9 percent of the votes and became the sole president of the republic. Ukraine did not tolerate this so in 1995, the Ukrainian parliament scrapped the Crimean Constitution, abolished the post of president and moved to depose and exile Meshkov from the country. Ukrainian special forces entered Meshkov's residence, disarmed his bodyguards and put him on a plane to Moscow. It just shows that you only look at one side of the argument that's all, and dismiss everything else that does not conform to your point of view.
    1
  13831.  @rebelmango2141  "So the guy in question had a secret agenda and that's why Ukraine did it reasonable. No it's not imperialism" Yuriy Meshkov was the only elected president of the Republic of Crimea that was eventually disposed by Ukraine, how's that not imperialism? He secured victory in the second round of the 1994 Crimean presidential elections, with 72.9 percent of the votes and became the sole president of the republic. Ukraine did not tolerate this so in 1995, the Ukrainian parliament scrapped the Crimean Constitution, abolished the post of president and moved to depose and exile Meshkov from the country. Ukrainian special forces entered Meshkov's residence, disarmed his bodyguards and put him on a plane to Moscow.
    1
  13832.  @rebelmango2141  "So the guy in question had a secret agenda and that's why Ukraine did it reasonable. No it's not imperialism" Yuriy Meshkov was the only elected president of the Republic of Crimea that was eventually removed from power by Ukraine, how's that not imperialism? He secured victory in the second round of the 1994 Crimean presidential elections, with 72.9 percent of the votes and became the sole president of the republic. Ukraine did not tolerate this so in 1995, the Ukrainian parliament scrapped the Crimean Constitution, abolished the post of president and moved to depose and exile Meshkov from the country. Ukrainian special forces entered Meshkov's residence, disarmed his bodyguards and put him on a plane to Moscow. It just shows that you only look at one side of the argument that's all, and dismiss everything else that does not conform to your point of view.
    1
  13833.  @rebelmango2141  "So the guy in question had a secret agenda and that's why Ukraine did it reasonable. No it's not imperialism" Yuriy Meshkov was the only elected president of the Republic of Crimea that was eventually disposed by Ukraine, He secured victory in the second round of the 1994 Crimean presidential elections, with 72.9 percent of the votes and became the sole president of the republic. This was unacceptable to Ukraine and in 1995, the Ukrainian parliament scrapped the Crimean Constitution, abolished the post of president and moved to depose and exile Meshkov from the country. Ukrainian special forces entered Meshkov's residence, disarmed his bodyguards and put him on a plane to Moscow. It just shows that you only look at one side of the argument that's all, and dismiss everything else that does not conform to your point of view.
    1
  13834.  @rebelmango2141  "So the guy in question had a secret agenda and that's why Ukraine did it reasonable. No it's not imperialism" Yuriy Meshkov was the only elected president of the Republic of Crimea that was eventually ousted by Ukraine, Meshkov had secured victory in the second round of the 1994 Crimean presidential elections, with 72.9 percent of the votes and became the sole president of the republic. This was unacceptable to Ukraine and in 1995, the Ukrainian parliament scrapped the Crimean Constitution, abolished the post of president and moved to remove and exile Meshkov from the country. Ukrainian special forces entered Meshkov's residence, disarmed his bodyguards and put him on a plane to Moscow. How is this not imperialism on the part of Ukraine?
    1
  13835.  @rebelmango2141  "I already addressed everything from the talks to Minks to the withdrawal" Clearly you did not. There's no mention of the Minsk Agreements in any of your posts, what are you talking about? In this whole thread, all mentions of the Minsk Agreements are made by me. Most of the time you just make claims in which you cannot support, all the while dismissing my points as false even after I provided proof.
    1
  13836.  @rebelmango2141  "Yeah a ceasefire for something Putin started" It's quite apparent now that Putin did not start it. The conflict in Ukraine began in 2014 with the War in Donbas with Kiev shelling the oblasts of Donetsk and Lughansk, in which 14,000 have been killed over the course of 8 years. Russia sought peace through the Minsk Agreements of which Ukraine renegaded upon, and after realizing that his words had fallen on deaf ears in the West for decades, Putin finally had no choice but to launch the special military operation in Ukraine.
    1
  13837.  @rebelmango2141  "Yeah a ceasefire for something Putin started" It's quite apparent now that Putin did not start it. The conflict in Ukraine began in 2014 with the War in Donbas with Kiev shelling the oblasts of Donetsk and Lughansk. Russia sought peace through the Minsk Agreements of which Ukraine renegaded upon, and after realizing that his words had fallen on deaf ears in the West for decades, Putin finally had no choice but to launch the special military operation in Ukraine. "he didn't follow specifically the point about foreign troops to leave ukraine" You know that Russian troops have always been present in Ukraine, in the naval base in the city of Sevastopol in Crimea. A 1997 treaty partitioned the Soviet Black Sea Fleet allowing Russia to continue basing its fleet in Sevastopol with the lease extended in 2010. So it's apparent that Russia cannot concede to the point about having its troops leave Ukraine.
    1
  13838.  @rebelmango2141  "Yeah a ceasefire for something Putin started" The conflict in Ukraine began in 2014 with the War in Donbas with Kiev shelling the oblasts of Donetsk and Lughansk. Russia sought peace through the Minsk Agreements of which Ukraine renegaded upon, and after realizing that his words had fallen on deaf ears in the West for decades, Putin finally had no choice but to launch the special military operation in Ukraine. "he didn't follow specifically the point about foreign troops to leave ukraine" You know that Russian troops have always been present in Ukraine, in the naval base in the city of Sevastopol in Crimea. A 1997 treaty partitioned the Soviet Black Sea Fleet allowing Russia to continue basing its fleet in Sevastopol with the lease extended in 2010. So it's apparent that Russia cannot concede to the point about having its troops leave Ukraine.
    1
  13839.  @rebelmango2141  "Yeah a ceasefire for something Putin started" The conflict in Ukraine began in 2014 with the War in Donbas with Kiev shelling the oblasts of Donetsk and Lughansk. Russia sought peace through the Minsk Agreements of which Ukraine renegaded upon, and after realizing that his words had fallen on deaf ears in the West for decades, Putin finally had no choice but to launch the special military operation in Ukraine. "he didn't follow specifically the point about foreign troops to leave ukraine" You know that Russian troops have always been present in Ukraine, in the naval base in the city of Sevastopol in Crimea. A 1997 treaty partitioned the Soviet Black Sea Fleet allowing Russia to continue basing its fleet in Sevastopol with the lease extended in 2010. So it's apparent that Russia cannot concede to the point about having its troops leave Ukraine.
    1
  13840.  @rebelmango2141  "he didn't follow specifically the point about foreign troops to leave ukraine" You know that Russian troops have always been present in Ukraine, in the naval base in the city of Sevastopol in Crimea. A 1997 treaty partitioned the Soviet Black Sea Fleet allowing Russia to continue basing its fleet in Sevastopol with the lease extended in 2010. So it's apparent that Russia cannot concede to the point about having its troops leave Ukraine.
    1
  13841.  @rebelmango2141  "The point is Russia sent them to have a sham referendum in favor of Russia." Crimea always had Russians troops stationed there. The Russian Black Fleet is stationed in Sevastopol city in Crimea, and they were allowed to operate there according to 1997 treaty. And you claim its a sham, but the fact remains that majority of the citizens of Crimea voted overwhelmingly (97%) to join the Russian Federation. After all, ethnic Russians make up the majority of Crimea's population, and even if Girkin said that the authorities were loyal the Kiev, the ordinary Crimean wanted out. And since we've proven that the [to join Russia] part was added on to his words, therefore it's not his actual words and that you tried dishonestly to make it seem as though he said then by attempting to remove the brackets. But you failed and left a "[o" as proof that you edited the original text.
    1
  13842.  @rebelmango2141  "Yuri Meshkov's primary political agenda was to establish much closer ties with the Russian Federation, potentially leading to the reunification of Crimea with Russia." Precisely. Because Crimea was historically part of Russia, before the Soviet Union transferred the oblast to Ukraine to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia. The majority of population of Crimea speaks Russian (84%) and that's why even you used the word reunification to indicate that Crimea was historically part of Russia being transferred to Ukraine. As for the political agenda, the Republic of Crimea declared itself and independent state, therefore they reserve the right to choose their own path, even if it means aligning more with Russia than Ukraine. Meshkov is the elected president of Republic of Crimea, and he wants Crimea to have closer relations with Russia, then it's Crimea's choice as sovereign nation. But Ukraine did not respect Crimea's sovereignty and their right to make choices. That's why Ukraine in 1995 scrapped the Crimean Constitution, abolished the post of president and moved to exile Meshkov from the country. If anything, this is Ukraine clearly trampling on the democratic rights of the Republic of Crimea, so how's this not imperialism?
    1
  13843.  @rebelmango2141  ​ "Yuri Meshkov's primary political agenda was to establish much closer ties with the Russian Federation, potentially leading to the reunification of Crimea with Russia." Precisely. Because Crimea was historically part of Russia, before the Soviet Union transferred the oblast to Ukraine to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia. The majority of population of Crimea speaks Russian (84%) and that's why even you used the word reunification to indicate that Crimea was historically part of Russia being transferred to Ukraine. In 1991 the Republic of Crimea declared itself and independent state, therefore they reserve the right to choose their own path, even if it means aligning more with Russia than Ukraine. Meshkov is the elected president of Republic of Crimea, and he wants Crimea to have closer relations with Russia, then it's Crimea's choice as sovereign nation. But Ukraine did not respect Crimea's sovereignty and their right to make choices. That's why Ukraine in 1995 scrapped the Crimean Constitution, abolished the post of president and moved to exile Meshkov from the country. If anything, this is clearly trampling on the democratic rights of the Republic of Crimea, so how's this not imperialism on Ukraine's part?
    1
  13844.  @rebelmango2141  ​ "Yuri Meshkov's primary political agenda was to establish much closer ties with the Russian Federation, potentially leading to the reunification of Crimea with Russia." Because Crimea was historically part of Russia, before the Soviet Union transferred the oblast to Ukraine to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia. The majority of population of Crimea speaks Russian (84%) and that's why even you used the word reunification to indicate that Crimea was historically part of Russia being transferred to Ukraine. But Ukraine did not respect Crimea's sovereignty and their right to make choices. That's why Ukraine in 1995 scrapped the Crimean Constitution, abolished the post of president and moved to exile Meshkov from the country. If anything, this is clearly trampling on the democratic rights of the Republic of Crimea, so how's this not imperialism on Ukraine's part?
    1
  13845.  @rebelmango2141  ​ "Yuri Meshkov's primary political agenda was to establish much closer ties with the Russian Federation, potentially leading to the reunification of Crimea with Russia." Because Crimea was historically part of Russia, before the Soviet Union transferred the oblast to Ukraine to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia. The majority of population of Crimea speaks Russian (84%) and that's why even you used the word reunification to indicate that Crimea was historically part of Russia being transferred to Ukraine. But Ukraine did not respect Crimea's sovereignty and their right to make choices. That's why Ukraine in 1995 scrapped the Crimean Constitution, abolished the post of president and moved to exile Meshkov from the country. If anything, this is clearly trampling on the sovereign rights of the Republic of Crimea, so how's this not imperialism on Ukraine's part?
    1
  13846.  @rebelmango2141  ​ @rebelmango2141 ​ "Yuri Meshkov's primary political agenda was to establish much closer ties with the Russian Federation, potentially leading to the reunification of Crimea with Russia." Because Crimea was historically part of Russia, before the Soviet Union transferred the oblast to Ukraine to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia. The majority of population of Crimea speaks Russian (84%) and that's why even you used the word reunification to indicate that Crimea was historically part of Russia being transferred to Ukraine. But Ukraine did not respect Crimea's sovereignty and their right to make choices. That's why Ukraine in 1995 scrapped the Crimean Constitution, abolished the post of president and moved to exile Meshkov from the country. So how isn't this imperialism on the part of Ukraine? They are overriding the sovereignty of Crimea with what they did.
    1
  13847.  @rebelmango2141  ​ "Yuri Meshkov's primary political agenda was to establish much closer ties with the Russian Federation, potentially leading to the reunification of Crimea with Russia." Because Crimea was historically part of Russia, before the Soviet Union transferred the oblast to Ukraine to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia. The majority of population of Crimea speaks Russian (84%) and that's why even you used the word reunification to indicate that Crimea was historically part of Russia being transferred to Ukraine. But Ukraine did not respect Crimea's sovereignty and in 1995, Ukraine scrapped the Crimean Constitution, abolished the post of president and moved to depose and exile Meshkov from the country. How is this not imperialism on the part of Ukraine?
    1
  13848.  @rebelmango2141  "What was he doing as president seeing as you skipped the part of what he was doing tlit proves my half story point" He's the President of the Republic of Crimea, and he wanted closer ties with Russia, given that Crimea was historically part of Russia before being transferred to Ukraine. What's wrong with that? Republic of Crimea had declared itself and independent state and it was free to make its own policies and decisions. But in 1995, Ukraine scrapped Crimean Constitution, abolished the post of President and removed Meshkov from power, just goes to show imperialism on the part of Ukraine.
    1
  13849.  @rebelmango2141  "Clearly you ignored it there' is was there a point in Minks about foreign troops leaving cause I made two references to it" When did you made two references to Minsk Agreements? I've searched through the whole comment thread and you never made any post about the Minsk Agreements.
    1
  13850.  @rebelmango2141  "Kinda strange Prigozhin and Girkin both say this whole thing was orchestrated by Russia with Girkin taking credit for Donbass both having ties to the government" Prigozhin is the leader of the Wagner Mercenary group, how's that considered having ties to the government? Same for Girkin, he may have been FSB for 18 years from 1996 to March 2013, but by the time of 2014, he was in charge of the only unit of Crimean militia, the Spetsnaz company.
    1
  13851.  @rebelmango2141  Look, the Republic of Crimea had declared itself an independent state in 1991. It's first and only President was Meshkov, having been elected in 1994, and as the leader of the country, he had the right to decide which policies to pursue that were in the interests of his country. And given that Crimea was historically part of Russia before being transferred to Ukraine, Meshkov sought to establish good relations with Russia, their motherland, since majority of the population of Crimea were ethnic Russians. But Ukraine would not accept this, that's why in 1995, Ukraine scrapped Crimea's constitution, abolishing the post of President, and removed Meshkov from power. This is basically an act of overriding a country's rights to make its own political choices, so how's this not Imperialism on Ukraine's part? It's apparent that you're the one only seeing half the story and refusing to acknowledge the other half and dismissing everything from the other side that's all.
    1
  13852.  @rebelmango2141  Look, the Republic of Crimea had declared itself an independent state in 1991. It's first and only President was Meshkov, having been elected in 1994, and as the leader of the country, he had the right to decide which policies to pursue that were in the interests of his country. And given that Crimea was historically part of Russia before being transferred to Ukraine, Meshkov sought to establish good relations with Russia, their motherland, since majority of the population of Crimea were ethnic Russians. But Ukraine would not accept this, that's why in 1995, Ukraine scrapped Crimea's constitution, abolishing the post of President, and removed Meshkov from power so how's this not Imperialism on Ukraine's part? It's apparent that you're the one only seeing half the story and refusing to acknowledge the other half and dismissing everything from the other side that's all.
    1
  13853.  @rebelmango2141  Look, the Republic of Crimea had declared itself an independent state in 1991. It's first and only President was Meshkov, having been elected in 1994, and as the leader of the country, he had the right to decide which policies to pursue that were in the interests of his country. And given that Crimea was historically part of Russia before being transferred to Ukraine, Meshkov sought to establish good relations with Russia, their motherland, since majority of the population of Crimea were ethnic Russians. But Ukraine would not accept this, that's why in 1995, Ukraine scrapped Crimea's constitution, abolishing the post of President, and removed Meshkov from power, so how's this not Imperialism on Ukraine's part? It's apparent that you're the one only seeing half the story and refusing to acknowledge the other half and dismissing everything from the other side that's all.
    1
  13854.  @rebelmango2141  Look, the Republic of Crimea had declared itself an independent state in 1991. It's first and only President was Meshkov, having been elected in 1994, and as the leader of the country, he had the right to decide which policies to pursue that were in the interests of his country. And given that Crimea was historically part of Russia before being transferred to Ukraine, Meshkov sought to establish good relations with Russia, their motherland, since majority of the population of Crimea were ethnic Russians. But Ukraine would not accept this, that's why in 1995, Ukraine scrapped Crimea's constitution, abolishing the post of President, and removed Meshkov from power, so how's this not Imperialism on Ukraine's part?
    1
  13855.  @rebelmango2141  The Crimean parliament proclaimed self-government on 5 May 1992 and passed the first Crimean constitution together with a declaration of conditional independence on the same day. Source: Wikipedia: History of Crimea (1991–2014) The Republic of Crimea even elected their own president Meshkov in 1994, but the Ukraine didn't accept this, so in 1994, Ukraine scrapped the Crimean constitution, abolishing the post of president and removed Meshkov from power. And this was achieved by sending 4,000 Ukrainian troops to Crimea, how's this not imperialism on the part of Ukraine?
    1
  13856.  @rebelmango2141  Blood and soil justifications? Ukraine sent 4,000 troops to Crimea to remove President Meshkov from power, abolishing the post of president and scrapping Crimea's constitution. If you claim Russian troops in Ukraine is imperialism, then why is it you ignore what Ukraine did in Crimea as imperialism?
    1
  13857.  @rebelmango2141  "Because Crimea already acknowledged itself as a container of Ukraine." When did Crimea ever made such an acknowledgement? You don't provide sources, dates or articles to support your argument, whereas I've shown that the Crimean parliament proclaimed self-government on 5 May 1992 and passed the first Crimean constitution with a declaration of conditional independence on the same day. But when Crimea elected a president representing Crimea's interests, Ukraine sent 4,000 troops to scrap Crimea's constitution, abolish its president post, and remove Meshkov, then isn't this clamping down on Crimea's political rights?
    1
  13858.  @rebelmango2141  "Yeah the history argument is a blood and soil justification." What's Ukraine's claim to Crimea then? They sent 4,000 Ukrainian troops to scrapped the Crimean constitution, abolish the post of President and remove their elected president, and absorbed the Republic of Crimea into its fold. How is this justified, whereas the 2014 Crimean Referendum to join the Russian Federation not?
    1
  13859.  @rebelmango2141  "So bad faith it wasn't because they had a president but what the president was doing" The Crimean President was doing what's in Crimea's interests, which is to grow closer ties with its neighbor, Russia, of which much of its population (mostly ethnic Russians) also consider their motherland. Remember, Crimea was historically part of Russia before it was transferred to Ukraine in 1954, so many Crimeans have familial ties to Russia. Same with Ukraine, it's in Ukraine's interests to forge closer relations with their neighbor, Russia. Had Yanukovych remained in power in Ukraine, then it's highly likely that the Ukraine conflict won't be happening today.
    1
  13860.  @rebelmango2141  Look, if Ukraine truly considered Crimea as part of its territory, then why'd did Ukraine cut off the major water supply to Crimea? The North Crimean Canal provided 85% of Crimea's water supply but Ukraine shut down the canal in 2014 and the water flow to Crimea became a trickle. In fact, it's thanks to the Russian special military operation in March 2022, that the canal was finally unblocked and the water once again flowing to Crimea.
    1
  13861.  @rebelmango2141  Wagner is a mercenary group and had Wagner been funded by the Russian government, then Prigozhin wouldn't have found the opportunity to mutiny against their funders. Yet Wagner did, showing that it's not funded by the Russian government. Spetsnaz are special forces in many post-Soviet states, and although spetsnaz is a Russian term, it can also be used by other post-Soviet states to refer to their own special forces. Igor Girkin was quoted saying: "I was in charge of the only unit of Crimean militia, the spetsnaz company which carried out combat missions." so he's referring to Crimea's special forces.
    1
  13862.  @rebelmango2141  "In September 1991, the Crimean parliament declared state sovereignty for Crimea as a constituent part of Ukraine." The Crimean parliament did not have the authority to make this decision, because according to USSR law, "On the procedure for resolving issues related to the withdrawal of a union republic from the USSR" from (3 April 1990) this issue could only be resolved via a referendum. The Crimean parliament proclaimed self-government on 5 May 1992 and passed the first Crimean constitution together with a declaration of conditional independence on the same day. A referendum to confirm the decision was not held until 1994 due to the opposition from the Kiev government. The Crimean parliament voted to bring in a President in 1993, which the Kiev government denounced as unconstitutional. In 1994 Crimea elected the Yuriy Meshkov as President, but in 1995, Ukraine scrapped the Crimean constitution, abolished the post of President and remove Meshkov from power, even though he was elected president.
    1
  13863.  @rebelmango2141  "Because it was annexed if Russia wants it they should provide for them." This shows that the Ukraine government doesn't really care about the people of Crimea if they could so easily cut off the water supply to them. You keep saying the referendum was a sham (without proof) but if it was a sham then Ukraine would still continue to supply water, because they consider Crimea as part of their territory. But the fact that they so quickly cut off the water supply, shows that Ukraine doesn't really regard the people of Crimea as their fellow citizens. "It never would have been blocked if Russia didn't annex it to begin with" The 2014 Crimea Referendum revealed that a majority of Crimeans wanted to rejoin the Russian Federation, so Russia merely obliged them. Also, it's thanks to Russia's special military operation in 2022 that the canal has been unblocked and the water flow to Crimea resumed.
    1
  13864.  @rebelmango2141  "In September 1991, the Crimean parliament declared state sovereignty for Crimea as a constituent part of Ukraine." The Crimean parliament did not have the authority to make this decision, because according to USSR law, "On the procedure for resolving issues related to the withdrawal of a union republic from the USSR" from (3 April 1990) this issue could only be resolved via a referendum. The Crimean parliament proclaimed self-government on 5 May 1992 and passed the first Crimean constitution together with a declaration of conditional independence on the same day. A referendum to confirm the decision was not held until 1994 due to the opposition from the Kiev government.
    1
  13865.  @rebelmango2141  "Because it was annexed if Russia wants it they should provide for them." This shows that the Ukraine government doesn't really care about the people of Crimea if they could so easily cut off the water supply to them. You keep saying the referendum was a sham (without proof) but if it was a sham then Ukraine would still continue to supply water, because they consider Crimea as part of their territory. But the fact that they so quickly cut off the water supply, shows that Ukraine doesn't really regard the people of Crimea as their fellow citizens. "It never would have been blocked if Russia didn't annex it to begin with" The 2014 Crimea Referendum revealed that a majority of Crimeans wanted to rejoin the Russian Federation, so Russia merely obliged them. Also, it's thanks to Russia that in 2022 that the canal has been unblocked and the water flow to Crimea resumed after 8 years of being blocked by Ukraine
    1
  13866.  @rebelmango2141  "Because it was annexed if Russia wants it they should provide for them." This shows that the Ukraine government doesn't really care about the people of Crimea if they could so easily cut off the water supply to them. You keep saying the referendum was a sham (without proof) but if it was a sham then Ukraine would still continue to supply water, because they consider Crimea as part of their territory. But the fact that they so quickly cut off the water supply, shows that Ukraine doesn't really regard the people of Crimea as their fellow citizens.
    1
  13867.  @rebelmango2141  "Because it was annexed if Russia wants it they should provide for them."_ This indicates that the Ukraine government doesn't really consider the people of Crimea as their own, if they could so easily cut off the water supply to them. Even if you claim the referendum was a sham, then Ukraine would have still continue to supply water, because they consider Crimea as part of their territory. But the fact that they so quickly cut off the water supply, shows that Ukraine doesn't really regard the people of Crimea as their fellow citizens. "It never would have been blocked if Russia didn't annex it to begin with" The 2014 Crimea Referendum revealed that a majority of Crimeans wanted to rejoin the Russian Federation, so Russia merely obliged them. Also, it's thanks to Russia that in 2022 that the canal has been unblocked and the water flow to Crimea resumed after 8 years of being blocked by Ukraine
    1
  13868.  @rebelmango2141  "Crimea was legally transfered Crimean parliament recognized itself as a constituent of Ukraine there's no counter to this" The Crimean parliament did not have the authority to make this decision, because according to USSR law, "On the procedure for resolving issues related to the withdrawal of a union republic from the USSR" from (3 April 1990) this issue could only be resolved via a referendum. Even if you it was transferred, the Crimean parliament proclaimed self-government on 5 May 1992. A referendum to confirm the decision was not held until 1994 due to the opposition from the Kiev government. The Crimean parliament voted to bring in a President in 1993, and Meshkov was elected in 1994. But by 1995, Ukraine scrapped Crimea's constitution, abolished the post of President, and removed Meshkov. This is clearly goes against the electoral wishes of the Crimean people and their ability to make their own choices.
    1
  13869.  @rebelmango2141  "No it wasn't in Crimea s interest. If they considered it motherland why didn't they vote to join in 1991" The Republic of Crimea voted in a President Meshkov, but in 1995, Ukraine scrapped Crimea's constitution, abolished the post of President and removed Meshkov from power. And Ukraine never considered Crimea's interests, look, they even cut off the water supply to Crimea by blocking the North Crimean Canal that provided 85% of Crimea's water supply.
    1
  13870.  @rebelmango2141  "It's highly they would have turned into another Belarus" At least Belarus has stable relations with their neighbor Russia, whereas look at Ukraine today and what has Ukraine gained by dealing with the West? Ukraine not only lost the Crimea Oblast, but also Donetsk, Lughansk, Kherson and Zaporiza. Had Yanukovych remained in power in Ukraine, it's likely that these oblasts (including Crimea) would have remained part of Ukraine.
    1
  13871.  @rebelmango2141  "Yeah Belarus is also an authoritarian dictatorship." You think Ukraine is a democracy? Zelensky's term as President of Ukraine has ended, yet why hasn't he called for fresh elections in Ukraine to choose a new President? Instead, Zelensky has abolished the opposition media in Ukraine and consolidated all TV platforms in Ukraine into one state broadcast.
    1
  13872.  @rebelmango2141  "They wouldn't have done that if Russia didn't annex everything else is irrelevant and addressed" That's sounds like how Israel tries to justify its operations in Gaza, blaming it on Oct7. But nevertheless, Ukraine cutting off the water supply to Crimea (whom they view as their own territory) clearly indicates that Ukraine government doesn't really care about the people of Crimea if they could so easily cut off the water supply to them. In fact, cutting off Crimea's water supply could be an indication that the referendum was valid, hence Ukraine sought to exact some sort of punishment onto the people of Crimea for voting to join Russia. Anyway it's good that since 2022, Russia has restored the water supply back to Crimea.
    1
  13873.  @rebelmango2141  "So you're saying Ukraine can't make decisions for itself it should just accept Russia as it's master while being poor in Russia's economic bloc" No I'm saying Ukraine should foster good relations with its neighbors, especially Russia. Develop good relations with Russia, don't apply to join NATO that would pose an existential threat to Russia. In fact, Ukraine would benefit the most if it remained a neutral country, balancing relations with Russia and the West for Ukraine's own interests. That's why during Yanukovych time and before 2014, Crimea was still very much a part of Ukraine, and so was Donetsk, Lughansk, Kherson, Zaporisza etc. Because Yanukovych knew how to develop good relations with Russia, this is called diplomacy.
    1
  13874.  @rebelmango2141  Ukraine was never a democracy even before 2022. The Economist Intelligence Unit assesses nations' democratic status in its annual Democracy Index and the 2021 index concluded that Ukraine was a "hybrid regime." Similarly, nonpartisan think tank Freedom House described Ukraine as a "hybrid or transitional regime" in its 2021 Nations in Transit report.
    1
  13875.  @rebelmango2141  No, it's because you claimed "They wouldn't have done that if Russia didn't annex everything else is irrelevant and addressed" which is exactly like you justifying a retaliation because an event happened. Had Ukraine truly considered Crimea to be their territory, then they wouldn't have cut off the water supply to their own people in Crimea.
    1
  13876.  @rebelmango2141  "Why especially Russia if their neighbor is being aggressive why should they be nice." How was Russia being aggressive? Under Yanukovych and before 2014, Ukraine gets to keep Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporiza, Kherson, as part of their territory. Today under Zelenskyy, those oblasts are no longer under Ukraine control, so you can't see the point of having good relations with your neighbors?
    1
  13877.  @rebelmango2141  "I've yet not been told how it's existential for Russia" NATO is a non-defensive organization that's been involved in wars in the Middle East, and is clearing singling out Russia as a target. Just like the US considered Soviet missiles being deployed to Cuba as an existential threat, Russia also considers it such if Ukraine joins NATO. Had Ukraine simply stated formally that it won't be joining NATO, then much conflict could have been avoided.
    1
  13878.  @rebelmango2141  Look, Ukraine cutting off the water supply to Crimea dealt a great blow to Crimea's economy, so why would the people of Crimea continue to think they want to be part of Ukraine after their water supply was blocked? It's apparent that for all its talk, Ukraine doesn't really view the people of Crimea as their own, and they sought to exact punishment upon Crimea for voting to join Russia.
    1
  13879.  @rebelmango2141  "Ukraine has been at war since 2014 so l." So you're saying Ukraine hasn't been a democracy since 2014? That's true, because Yanukovych was the last democratically elected President of Ukraine, before the 2014 Maidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) ousted him and replaced him with a US pupet. We know this from audio recordings of Victoria Nuland talking to Geoffrey Pyatt on who will be the next leader of Ukraine. The candidate they approved of ended up becoming the next president, so since then, Ukraine has never been a democracy. "Again your Crimea argument is nonsense if it's not under their control why should they give anything" That means you agree Ukraine doesn't really consider Crimea as part of their territory, nor do they consider the people of Crimea as their own people. So why should Crimea want to rejoin Ukraine given how their water supply has been cut off by them?
    1
  13880.  @rebelmango2141  "Ukraine has been at war since 2014 so l." So you're saying Ukraine hasn't been a democracy since 2014? That's true, because Yanukovych was the last democratically elected President of Ukraine, before the 2014 Maidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) ousted him and replaced him with a US pupet. We know this from audio recordings of Victoria Nuland talking to Geoffrey Pyatt on who will be the next leader of Ukraine. The candidate they approved of ended up becoming the next president, so since then, Ukraine has never been a democracy.
    1
  13881.  @rebelmango2141  "Again your Crimea argument is nonsense if it's not under their control why should they give anything" That means you agree Ukraine doesn't really consider Crimea as part of their territory, nor do they consider the people of Crimea as their own people. So why should Crimea want to rejoin Ukraine given how their water supply has been cut off by them?
    1
  13882.  @rebelmango2141  "There's no evidence they were doing that to Russia and it is defensive" NATO has expanded eastwards into 13 countries surrounding Russia, so it's obvious that NATO is singling out Russia as a target. And NATO is certainly not a defensive organization, they bombed Yugoslavia in 1999 even though Yugoslavia didn't attack any NATO member and Article 5 wasn't activated. So we have a non-defensive organization like NATO encroaching onto Russia's borders, so why shouldn't Russia consider the organization an existential threat?
    1
  13883.  @rebelmango2141  You said: "Yes as I said you're saying Ukraine should just be subservient to Russia or else" No, like I said earlier, I'm saying Ukraine should foster good relations with its neighbors, especially Russia. Develop good relations with Russia, don't apply to join NATO that would pose an existential threat to Russia. In fact, Ukraine would benefit the most if it remained a neutral country, balancing relations with Russia and the West for Ukraine's own interests. That's why during Yanukovych time and before 2014, Crimea was still very much a part of Ukraine, and so was Donetsk, Lughansk, Kherson, Zaporisza etc. Because Yanukovych knew how to develop good relations with Russia, this is called diplomacy.
    1
  13884.  @rebelmango2141  You said: "Yes as I said you're saying Ukraine should just be subservient to Russia or else" No, like I said earlier, I'm saying Ukraine should foster good relations with its neighbors, especially Russia. Develop good relations with Russia, don't apply to join NATO that would pose an existential threat to Russia. In fact, Ukraine would benefit the most if it remained a neutral country, balancing relations with Russia and the West for Ukraine's own interests. That's why during Yanukovych time and before 2014, Crimea was still very much a part of Ukraine, and so was Donetsk, Lughansk, Kherson, Zaporisza etc. Because Yanukovych knew how to develop good relations with Russia, this is called diplomacy.
    1
  13885.  @rebelmango2141  "Again why should Ukraine provide for a place not under their control" How would the Crimeans feel if Ukraine had cut off their water supply? It shows that Ukraine doesn't welcome back Crimea if they don't care about the people having access to water, then how can Ukraine continue to claim Crimea as part of their territory?
    1
  13886.  @rebelmango2141  What exactly has Ukraine gained by aligning itself with the West completely? They've lost territory oblasts of Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaproriza and Kherson. Democracy? Ukraine has been labelled as "hybrid or transitional regime" by Western institutions like Freedom House and The Economist Intelligence Unit. Economic progress? What economic progress has Ukraine gotten from the West? In fact, post-soviet Ukraine inherited much of the Soviet Union's industrial capability and Ukraine was arguably one of the more advanced post-Soviet states. Now look at the economic state of Ukraine today. You keep saying Ukraine shouldn't be subservient to Russia, then why should they be subservient to the West?
    1
  13887.  @rebelmango2141  Yugoslavia did not attack any NATO member, so there was no Article 5. Yet NATO bombed Yugoslavia in 1999, doesn't that prove that NATO is not a defensive organization? They can attack others without being attacked first, then how's that a defensive organization?
    1
  13888.  @rebelmango2141  "Ukraine wasn't a neutral country it was economically controlled by Russia." What has Ukraine gained economically by aligning itself with the West completely? Post-Soviet Ukraine had inherited much of Soviet Union's industrial capacity, and post-Soviet Ukraine was arguably one of the most industrially advanced of the post-Soviet states. Yet where has all that Ukrainian industrialization gone?
    1
  13889.  @rebelmango2141  "Yes your argument is Ukraine shouldn't do anything that benefits it if it upsets Russia" Russia is Ukraine's neighbor, there's no changing that fact. Russia has expressed concerns about NATO's eastward expansion and there's no way Russia would tolerate Ukraine joining NATO. All Ukraine needed to do was to declare that they won't join NATO, and then the relationship would remain beneficial for both Russia and Ukraine. Look, even during Yanukovych time, Ukraine get to keep Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporiza, Kherson, but look at under Zelensky now and Ukraine has lost all those oblasts.
    1
  13890.  @rebelmango2141  "They would have had water if it was part of Ukraine after annexation they don't have that obligation I don't agree with this absurd logic" Then all the more the Crimeans aren't going to want to return to Ukraine given that Ukraine was the one who cut off their water supply. It shows that Ukraine doesn't consider Crimea as part of their territory, nor the people there as their own. Anyway, it's good that in 2022, Russia has managed to remove the blockage and restore the water supply back to Crimea. That's certainly going to boost Crimea's view of Russia more.
    1
  13891.  @rebelmango2141  "Yes your argument is Ukraine shouldn't do anything that benefits it if it upsets Russia" Russia is Ukraine's neighbor, there's no changing that fact. Russia has expressed concerns about NATO's eastward expansion and there's no way Russia would tolerate Ukraine joining NATO. All Ukraine needed to do was to declare that they won't join NATO, and then the relationship would remain beneficial for both Russia and Ukraine. Look, even during Yanukovych time, Ukraine get to keep Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporiza, Kherson,
    1
  13892.  @rebelmango2141  "Yes your argument is Ukraine shouldn't do anything that benefits it if it upsets Russia" Russia is Ukraine's neighbor, there's no changing that fact. Russia has expressed concerns about NATO's eastward expansion and there's no way Russia would tolerate Ukraine joining NATO. All Ukraine needed to do was to declare that they won't join NATO, and then the relationship would remain beneficial for both Russia and Ukraine.
    1
  13893.  @rebelmango2141  "Yes your argument is Ukraine shouldn't do anything that benefits it if it upsets Russia" There's no changing the fact that Russia is Ukraine's neighbor. Russia has expressed concerns about NATO's eastward expansion and Russia wouldn't tolerate Ukraine joining NATO. All Ukraine needed to do was to declare that they won't join NATO, and then the relationship would remain beneficial for both Russia and Ukraine. Look, even during Yanukovych time, Ukraine get to keep Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporiza, Kherson,
    1
  13894.  @rebelmango2141  "That's just false Ukraine was one of the poorest post Soviet states compared to those in the EU" I'm comparing with the post Soviet states. Of all the post Soviet states, Ukraine was the most industrially advanced compared to Belarus, Estonia, Kazakhstan, etc. But what's the point of your comparison with those in the EU? Even after Ukraine aligned itself with the West, Ukraine's economy has only gone down since.
    1
  13895.  @rebelmango2141  "aligning with Russia isn't good for the economy" Ukraine experienced the majority of its industrialization while under the Soviet Union. The Ukrainian SSR was the only Soviet republic other than Russia manufacturing various types of automobiles and automotive parts with a former annual output of more than 200 thousand units. But after the agreement with the EU, most car production in Ukraine now involves assembly of European, Korean and Chinese brands. In April 2018 the Ukrainian carmakers association UkrAutoProm stated that the automotive industry in Ukraine worked at only 2% of their capacity, while the output of motor vehicles was nearly 98% less than that in March 2008. How then exactly has Ukraine's economy developed under the EU?
    1
  13896.  @rebelmango2141  "Russia's concerns are nonsensical." It's precisely this kind of thinking that led to the conflict in Ukraine today. People like you constantly viewing Russia as "the enemy," and dismiss all its concerns as nonsense, and continue to antagonize Russia. When you keep on treating them as enemy, how do you expect them to treat you like a friend?
    1
  13897.  @rebelmango2141  "if you have to pick between do what Russia says or be invaded or join NATO and don't worry about that" It's precisely because Ukraine made moves to join NATO that Russia was alarmed and led to the launching of the special military operation in 2022. Because people like you constantly dismiss the concerns of Russia, and paint them as the adversary with absolutely no redeeming qualities, then how can you expect Russia not to treat you in kind? Look, during Yanukovych time, Ukraine could get to keep Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporiza, Kherson, but fast forward till today and under Zelensky, not only has Ukraine lost those oblasts, but what exactly has Ukraine gained by aligning itself with the West completely?
    1
  13898.  @rebelmango2141  Fact is that Russia is a powerful country located in the region of Eastern Europe, and that Russia is here to stay, and won't go away just because you DON'T like Russia. You claim Yanukovych was a Russian stooge, well, the same can be said of Zelensky being one for the West. But under Yanukovych, Ukraine had peaceful relations with Russia, got to keep Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, but what has Zelensky gotten for Ukraine? 8 years of civil war in the Donbas, with Ukrainian shelling Ukrainian, is this your idea of "economic progress" by aligning with EU and the West?
    1
  13899.  @rebelmango2141  "Wanna talk about the cost that industrialization came with." Everything has a cost, and that includes industrialization. But the fact is that Ukraine SSR was one of the most advanced industrially, and remained so even until post-Soviet, where Ukraine's industry and economy began to stagnate. And of course Ukraine was in conflict after 2014, because the Maidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) ousted Yanukovych (arguably the only Ukrainian president able to make peace with Russia) and that's why you have conflict. I mean, you keep implying that Ukraine's economy has developed with the EU, but how exactly?
    1
  13900.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends" For decades Russia has been trying to engage in peaceful relations with West, but it's just that you've close your eyes to them, and view everything they're doing in a hostile light. For example, in 2001, following 9/11, Putin reached out to George W. Bush and even shared Russian intelligence that they had with the US, which proved vital to the US forces in Afghanistan. But sadly, the acts were not reciprocal, and time and time again, Russia's concerns about NATO expansion kept on falling on deaf ears in the West, as people dismiss Russia.
    1
  13901.  @rebelmango2141  "You know that cost was a famine with a million people right." Industry and Factories don't just pop out of nowhere. You'll need workers to work in the factories, and since most industrializing nations are from agricultural nations, the workforce has to come from the farm workers. Also, since workers need to eat, but do not produce food like farm workers, then the strain on food become worst. Throw in some bad weather conditions like drought, and famine is the result.
    1
  13902.  @rebelmango2141  "Ukraine wasn't going to join NATO because of Crimea and the Donbass since NATO wants defined borders so this logic falls apart immediately" Well, why don't Ukraine put that down in writing formally that Ukraine wasn't going to join NATO? The thing is NATO hasn't stopped welcoming Ukraine, even though Ukraine stands no chance of joining like you said, NATO continues to encourage Ukraine to go against Russia, sending military aid and making Ukrainian soldiers fight Russia, instead of having NATO soldiers do that.
    1
  13903.  @rebelmango2141  " it's still people like you defending coercion and imperialism" I am defending diplomacy and peace. Had Yanukovych remained in power, Ukraine would get to keep its territories of Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc. On the other than, you are promoting conflict by telling Ukraine to ignore Russia's concerns, thus resulting Ukraine getting devastated, losing a significant portion of its population, losing its economic growth, not being considered "Western Democracy", I mean it's clear that you don't have Ukraine's interests in mind. Had Zelensky truly had Ukraine's interests in mind, he would be suing for peace.
    1
  13904.  @rebelmango2141  In fact, Russia at one point had expressed interest in joining NATO. During a series of interviews with filmmaker Oliver Stone, Putin told him that he floated the possibility of Russia joining NATO to Bill Clinton when he visited Moscow in 2000. He said it was hard for him to visualize NATO as an enemy and he said: "Russia is part of the European culture. And I cannot imagine my own country in isolation from Europe and what we often call the civilized world." In fact, Russia joining NATO would help get rid of the existential threat that it poses to Russia.
    1
  13905.  @rebelmango2141  "This doesn't address anything other countries didn't have this issue while industrializing" Because when the Western countries industrialize, they inadvertently created famines in the colonies their held, because farm workers became industrial workforce and the food supply is affected, not to mention bad weather conditions affecting food supply. But the fact remains that post-Soviet Ukraine was among the most industrialized of the Post-Soviet states whereas what economic progress has Ukraine had with the EU?
    1
  13906.  @rebelmango2141  "Why should Ukraine do whatever Russia wants." Since you said Ukraine wasn't going to join NATO, then why not put that down in paper and reassure Russia's concerns? You yourself said they didn't want to join, why don't they make it clear to Russia? It would have help avoided a lot of misunderstanding and it's likely the situation in Ukraine today won't be as serious. You said: "The population wants to join that's why." Did Ukraine held a referendum asking the population if they want to join NATO? How can you make such a claim then?
    1
  13907.  @rebelmango2141  "Because Russia doesn't get to dictate what Ukraine does or not I said they want to join but they couldn't." You yourself said Ukraine couldn't join NATO, then why not Ukraine formally announce that they will not join NATO? That would have cleared up misunderstandings and it's likely Ukraine-Russian relations won't be as frayed as they are today. I mean, look at Ukraine today and they are no closer to joining NATO. Yet NATO keeps on encouraging Ukraine with false promises that they will accept Ukraine one day, when this is just using Ukraine to fight against Russia, instead of having NATO soldiers do that. "There was no misunderstanding only Russia seeking control." Russia stated many times that they consider NATO's eastward expansion as an existential threat. Ukraine declaring formally that they will not join NATO will be helping clear up this misunderstanding.
    1
  13908.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends don't do that people like you defending imperialism" It's because of people like you, constantly dismissing Russia's concerns, that led to the conflict in Ukraine today. I am advocating for diplomacy and peace. Had Yanukovych remained in power, it's likely Ukraine-Russian ties won't be as frayed as they are today. Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still remain part of Ukraine today, had Ukraine played their cards right and engaged in proper diplomacy with Russia But people like you constantly view Russia as "the enemy", allowing for absolutely no reconciliation and repairing of damaged ties, instead seeking to cut ties entirely. And where has such a way of thinking gotten Ukraine? Nowhere! What has Ukraine gained from aligning itself with those ideas that you spoke of? They've lost Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc. Economically, Ukraine has no economic growth like it had before. Politically, Ukraine isn't even considered by Western institutions to be a democracy, they instead view Ukraine as a "hybrid regime." Honestly, what benefit to Ukraine is there to speak of by dismissing Russia's concerns?
    1
  13909.  @rebelmango2141  "The population wants to join that's why. Opinion polls tell me they want to" Since you're convinced that the population wants Ukraine to join NATO based off opinion polls, then why won't you believe that the majority of Crimeans want Crimea to join the Russian Federation? The Crimea even held a referendum in which an overwhelming majority (97%) voted to join the Russian Federation.
    1
  13910.  @rebelmango2141  "Did that industrialization help post Soviet Ukraine the answer is no" Of course the industrialization helped. Post Soviet Ukraine was capable of making its own automobiles. Ukraine's car companies were all created during the Soviet Union. But what has Ukraine aligning itself with the EU ever done for Ukraine economically and politically? Ukraine's economic growth has stagnated and instead of making their own automobiles, they now make cars for other brands instead of their own. And politically, the Western institutions like Freedom House and The Economist Intelligence Unit conclude that Ukraine is a "hybrid or transitional regime" so what benefit is there to speak of for Ukraine aligning with the West?
    1
  13911.  @rebelmango2141  Since you claim Russia claiming Crimea is "imperialist" then what's Ukraine's claim to Crimea? You said Crimea was legally transferred to Ukraine, but that transfer was by the Soviet Union, so if you're claiming the Soviet Union is imperialist, then isn't Ukraine staking its claim to Crimea from the Soviet transfer? Isn't this also imperialism on Ukraine's part?
    1
  13912.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends don't do that people like you defending imperialism" It's because of people like you, constantly dismissing Russia's concerns, that led to the conflict in Ukraine today. I am advocating for diplomacy and peace. Had Yanukovych remained in power, it's likely Ukraine-Russian ties won't be as frayed as they are today. Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still remain part of Ukraine today, had Ukraine played their cards right and engaged in proper diplomacy with Russia But people like you constantly view Russia as "the enemy", allowing for absolutely no reconciliation and repairing of damaged ties, instead seeking to cut ties entirely. And where has such a way of thinking gotten Ukraine? Nowhere! What has Ukraine gained from aligning itself with those ideas that you spoke of? They've lost Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc. Economically, Ukraine has no economic growth like it had before. Politically, Ukraine isn't even considered by Western institutions to be a democracy, they instead view Ukraine as a "hybrid regime." Honestly, what benefit to Ukraine is there to speak of by dismissing Russia's concerns?
    1
  13913.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends don't do that people like you defending imperialism" It's because of people like you, constantly dismissing Russia's concerns, that led to the conflict in Ukraine today. I am advocating for diplomacy and peace. Had Yanukovych remained in power, it's likely Ukraine-Russian ties won't be as frayed as they are today. Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still remain part of Ukraine today, had Ukraine played their cards right and engaged in proper diplomacy with Russia But people like you constantly view Russia as "the enemy", allowing for absolutely no reconciliation and repairing of damaged ties, instead seeking to cut ties entirely. And where has such a way of thinking gotten Ukraine? Nowhere! What has Ukraine gained from aligning itself with those ideas that you spoke of? They've lost Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc. No economic growth to speak of. And politically, Ukraine isn't even considered by Western institutions to be a democracy, they instead view Ukraine as a "hybrid regime." ?
    1
  13914.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends don't do that people like you defending imperialism" It's because of people like you, constantly dismissing Russia's concerns, that led to the conflict in Ukraine today. I am advocating for diplomacy and peace. Had Yanukovych remained in power, it's likely Ukraine-Russian ties won't be as frayed as they are today. Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still remain part of Ukraine today, had Ukraine played their cards right and engaged in proper diplomacy with Russia But people like you having such an adversarial view of Russia, allowing for absolutely no reconciliation and repairing of damaged ties, instead seeking to cut ties entirely. And where has such a way of thinking gotten Ukraine? What has Ukraine gained from aligning itself with those ideas that you spoke of? They've lost Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc. No economic growth to speak of. And politically, Ukraine isn't even considered by Western institutions to be a democracy, they instead view Ukraine as a "hybrid regime."
    1
  13915.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends don't do that people like you defending imperialism" Defending Imperialism? I am advocating for diplomacy and peace. Had Yanukovych remained in power, it's likely Ukraine-Russian ties won't be as frayed as they are today. Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still remain part of Ukraine today, had Ukraine played their cards right and engaged in proper diplomacy with Russia But people like you having such an adversarial view of Russia, allowing for absolutely no reconciliation and repairing of damaged ties, instead seeking to cut ties entirely. And where has such a way of thinking gotten Ukraine? What has Ukraine gained from aligning itself with those ideas that you spoke of? They've lost Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc. No economic growth to speak of. And politically, Ukraine isn't even considered by Western institutions to be a democracy, they instead view Ukraine as a "hybrid regime."
    1
  13916.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends don't do that people like you defending imperialism" Defending Imperialism? I am advocating for diplomacy and peace. Had Yanukovych remained in power, it's likely Ukraine-Russian ties won't be as frayed as they are today. Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still remain part of Ukraine today, had Ukraine played their cards right and engaged in proper diplomacy with Russia But people like you viewing Russia always as "the enemy" allowing for absolutely no reconciliation whatsoever that has led to conflict in Ukraine today. And where has such a way of thinking gotten Ukraine? What has Ukraine gained from aligning itself with those ideas that you spoke of? They've lost Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc. No economic growth to speak of. And politically, Ukraine isn't even considered by Western institutions to be a democracy, they instead view Ukraine as a "hybrid regime."
    1
  13917.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends don't do that people like you defending imperialism" Defending Imperialism? I am advocating for diplomacy and peace. Had Yanukovych remained in power, it's likely Ukraine-Russian ties won't be as frayed as they are today. Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still remain part of Ukraine today, had Ukraine played their cards right and engaged in proper diplomacy with Russia But it's people like you constantly dismissing Russia's concerns that has led to conflict in Ukraine today. And where has such a way of thinking gotten Ukraine? What has Ukraine gained from aligning itself with those ideas that you spoke of? They've lost Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc. No economic growth to speak of. And politically, Ukraine isn't even considered by Western institutions to be a democracy, they instead view Ukraine as a "hybrid regime."
    1
  13918.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends don't do that people like you defending imperialism" Defending Imperialism? I am advocating for diplomacy and peace. Had Yanukovych remained in power, it's likely Ukraine-Russian ties won't be as frayed as they are today. Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still remain part of Ukraine today, had Ukraine played their cards right and engaged in proper diplomacy with Russia On the other hand, it's your way of thinking, of constantly dismissing Russia's concerns that has led to the conflict in Ukraine today. What exactly has Ukraine gained from such a way of thinking? They've lost Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, they have no economic growth to speak of, and politically, they aren't even considered a democracy. What exactly has Ukraine gained by following your way of thinking?
    1
  13919.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends don't do that people like you defending imperialism" Defending imperialism? I am advocating for a diplomatic and peaceful approach, you're advocating for antagonism and dismissing Russia's concerns. Had Yanukovych remained in power, it's likely Ukraine-Russian ties won't be as frayed as they are today. Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still remain part of Ukraine today, had Ukraine played their cards right and engaged in proper diplomacy with Russia On the other hand, it's your way of thinking, of constantly dismissing Russia's concerns that has led to the conflict in Ukraine today. What exactly has Ukraine gained from such a way of thinking? They've lost Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, they have no economic growth to speak of, and politically, they aren't even considered a democracy. What exactly has Ukraine gained by following your way of thinking?
    1
  13920.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends don't do that people like you defending imperialism" Defending imperialism? I am advocating for a diplomatic and peaceful approach, you're advocating for antagonism and dismissing Russia's concerns. Had Yanukovych remained in power, it's likely Ukraine-Russian ties won't be as frayed as they are today. Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still remain part of Ukraine today, had Ukraine played their cards right and engaged in proper diplomacy with Russia. On the other hand, what exactly has Ukraine gained from following your way of thinking? They've lost Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, they have no economic growth to speak of, and politically, they aren't even considered a democracy.
    1
  13921.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends don't do that people like you defending imperialism" I am advocating for a diplomatic and peaceful approach, you're advocating for antagonism and dismissing Russia's concerns. Had Yanukovych remained in power, it's likely Ukraine-Russian ties won't be as frayed as they are today. Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still remain part of Ukraine today, had Ukraine played their cards right and engaged in proper diplomacy with Russia. On the other hand, what exactly has Ukraine gained from following your way of thinking? They've lost Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, they have no economic growth to speak of, and politically, they aren't even considered a democracy.
    1
  13922.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends don't do that people like you defending imperialism" Where did you get your portrayal of Russia from? From Western media? I am advocating for a diplomatic and peaceful approach, you're advocating for antagonism and dismissing Russia's concerns. Had Yanukovych remained in power, it's likely Ukraine-Russian ties won't be as frayed as they are today. Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still remain part of Ukraine today, had Ukraine played their cards right and engaged in proper diplomacy with Russia. On the other hand, what exactly has Ukraine gained from following your way of thinking? They've lost Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, they have no economic growth to speak of, and politically, they aren't even considered a democracy.
    1
  13923.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends don't do that people like you defending imperialism" It's because of people like you, constantly dismissing Russia's concerns, that led to the conflict in Ukraine today. I am advocating for diplomacy and peace. Had Yanukovych remained in power, it's likely Ukraine-Russian ties won't be as frayed as they are today. Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still remain part of Ukraine today, had Ukraine played their cards right and engaged in proper diplomacy with Russia But people like you constantly view Russia as "the enemy", allowing for absolutely no reconciliation and repairing of damaged ties, instead seeking to cut ties entirely. And where has such a way of thinking gotten Ukraine? Nowhere! What has Ukraine gained from aligning itself with those ideas that you spoke of? They've lost Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc. Economically, Ukraine has no economic growth like it had before. Politically, Ukraine isn't even considered by Western institutions to be a democracy, they instead view Ukraine as a "hybrid regime." Honestly, what benefit to Ukraine is there to speak of by dismissing Russia's concerns?ons to be a democracy, they instead view Ukraine as a "hybrid regime." ?
    1
  13924.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends don't do that people like you defending imperialism" I am advocating a path of peace and diplomacy for Ukraine, by taking into consideration its neighbor, Russia's concerns. It's highly likely that Ukraine won't be such a sad state today had Yanukovych remained in power, and the oblasts of Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still be a part of Ukraine today. How is this way of thinking bad? On the other hand, what has Ukraine gained from following your way of thinking? They've lost Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, they have no economic growth to speak of, and politically, they aren't even considered a democracy.
    1
  13925.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends don't do that people like you defending imperialism" It's because of people like you, constantly dismissing Russia's concerns, that led to the conflict in Ukraine today. I am advocating for diplomacy and peace. Had Yanukovych remained in power, it's likely Ukraine-Russian ties won't be as frayed as they are today. Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still remain part of Ukraine today, had Ukraine played their cards right and engaged in proper diplomacy with Russia But people like you constantly view Russia as "the enemy", allowing for absolutely no reconciliation and repairing of damaged ties, instead seeking to cut ties entirely. And where has such a way of thinking gotten Ukraine? Nowhere! What has Ukraine gained from aligning itself with those ideas that you spoke of? They've lost Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc. Economically, Ukraine has no economic growth like it had before. Politically, Ukraine isn't even considered by Western institutions to be a democracy, they instead view Ukraine as a "hybrid regime." Honestly, what benefit to Ukraine is there to speak of by dismissing Russia's concerns?ons to be a democracy, they instead view Ukraine as a "hybrid regime." ?
    1
  13926.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends don't do that people like you defending imperialism" It's because of people like you, constantly dismissing Russia's concerns, that led to the conflict in Ukraine today. I am advocating for diplomacy and peace. Had Yanukovych remained in power, it's likely Ukraine-Russian ties won't be as frayed as they are today. Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still remain part of Ukraine today, had Ukraine played their cards right and engaged in proper diplomacy with Russia But people like you constantly view Russia as "the enemy", allowing for absolutely no reconciliation and repairing of damaged ties, instead seeking to cut ties entirely. And where has such a way of thinking gotten Ukraine? Nowhere! What has Ukraine gained from aligning itself with those ideas that you spoke of? They've lost Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc. Economically, Ukraine has no economic growth like it had before. Politically, Ukraine isn't even considered by Western institutions to be a democracy, they instead view Ukraine as a "hybrid regime." Honestly, what benefit to Ukraine is there to speak of by dismissing Russia's concerns?ons to be a democracy, they instead view Ukraine as a "hybrid regime." ?
    1
  13927.  @rebelmango2141  "Maybe Russia should stop portraying itself as an enemy by antagonize meaning not letting them coerce friends don't do that people like you defending imperialism" It's because of people like you, constantly dismissing Russia's concerns, that led to the conflict in Ukraine today. I am advocating for diplomacy and peace. Had Yanukovych remained in power, it's likely Ukraine-Russian ties won't be as frayed as they are today. Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still remain part of Ukraine today, had Ukraine played their cards right and engaged in proper diplomacy with Russia But people like you constantly view Russia as "the enemy", allowing for absolutely no reconciliation and repairing of damaged ties, instead seeking to cut ties entirely. And where has such a way of thinking gotten Ukraine? Nowhere! What has Ukraine gained from aligning itself with those ideas that you spoke of? They've lost Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc. Economically, Ukraine has no economic growth like it had before. Politically, Ukraine isn't even considered by Western institutions to be a democracy, they instead view Ukraine as a "hybrid regime."
    1
  13928.  @rebelmango2141  Crimea was historically part of Russia before it was transferred by the Soviet Union to Ukraine. The majority of the people in Crimea are ethnic Russians and they have historical roots in the motherland. Furthermore, Ukraine has made it clear that they doesn't care about Crimea if they can cut off the water supply to Crimea, so why would Crimea continue to accept being under Ukrainian rule, you tell me? And you're claiming Russia claims Crimea because of "imperialism", well Ukraine's claim to Crimea is even shakier, it's because Soviet Union transferred Crimea to Ukraine, then if you claim the Soviet Union is imperialist, then isn't Ukraine also, since they adhere to the transfer?
    1
  13929.  @rebelmango2141  "Because they shouldn't capitulate to Russia's demands." Based off what? Your own sense of virtue? Russia is their neighbor like it or not, and since you agreed that Ukraine couldn't be joining NATO, then why not put that down on paper? So much unnecessary bloodshed could have been avoided had Yanukovych remained in power. Not to mention that Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc, would still be part of Ukraine today, had Ukraine "capitulated" to Russia's "demands". Now they have next to nothing.
    1
  13930.  @rebelmango2141  "Ukrainian soldiers are choosing to fight stop taking agency away from them" No they aren't. The best soldiers are gone, and what's left behind are the young and the elderly, including women. They are fleeing the frontline in droves, because Zelensky refuses to do what's in Ukraine's best interest and sue for peace. And people like you are encouraging Ukraine to continue fighting and expending lives unnecessary because of some belief that Russia is "the enemy."
    1
  13931.  @rebelmango2141  "Ukrainian soldiers are choosing to fight stop taking agency away from them" No they aren't. The best soldiers are gone, and what's left behind are the young and the elderly, including women. They are fleeing the frontline in droves, because Zelensky refuses to do what's in Ukraine's best interest and sue for peace. And people like you are encouraging Ukraine to continue fighting.
    1
  13932.  @rebelmango2141  "You're advocating for the Chamberlain way of appeasement it doesn't work." No, it's proven fact that when Yanukovych was in power, Ukraine still had control over Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, etc. Yet you're calling this "capitulating to Russia's demands?" Look what happens when Ukraine does the opposite. They've lost those oblasts, they have no more economic growth to speak of, and politically, they aren't even considered a democracy. Worst, they stand no chance of entering NATO, and yet NATO is encouraging them to continue fighting Russia with Ukrainian soldiers, instead of having NATO soldiers do that.
    1
  13933.  @rebelmango2141  "I know you scoff at the idea of sovereignty and blame the victim for the actions of the abuser I don't" Sovereignty? Ukraine lost its during the 2014 Maidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) with the ousting of Yanukovych. We know this from audio recordings of Victoria Nuland talking to Geoffrey Pyatt on who will be the next leader of Ukraine. The candidate they approved of ended up becoming the next president, so since then, Ukraine has never had agency. I advocate a viable, diplomatic peaceful path for Ukraine, whereas you push for Ukraine to continue on a path to its own destruction, based off your own sense of virtue.
    1
  13934.  @rebelmango2141  "Rusich is authoritarian Ukraine isn't also they didn't have economic growth before" Russia has successfully conducted its elections in March 2024. Apart from Putin, there were 3 other candidates on the ballot paper to vote for in the Russian elections. Also, Russia invited international observers from 36 countries (including 30 national parliaments, as well as 5 international organizations) to monitor the Russian elections. Whereas Zelensky's term as President of Ukraine has ended, yet why hasn't he called for fresh elections in Ukraine to choose a new President? Instead, Zelensky has consolidated all TV platforms in Ukraine into one state broadcast, effectively abolishing the opposition media. "also they didn't have economic growth before" Their economic growth was due to Soviet industrialization in Ukraine, and since aligning itself with the West, Ukraine has no economic growth of which to speak of. So again, how does it benefit Ukraine to align itself with the West completely?
    1
  13935.  @rebelmango2141  "Ukrainian soldiers are choosing to fight stop taking agency away from them" No they aren't. The best soldiers are gone, and what's left behind are the young and the elderly, including women. They are fleeing the frontline in droves, because Zelensky refuses to do what's in Ukraine's best interest and sue for peace.
    1
  13936.  @rebelmango2141  "Rusich is authoritarian Ukraine isn't also they didn't have economic growth before" Russia has successfully conducted its elections in March 2024. Apart from Putin, there were 3 other candidates on the ballot paper to vote for in the Russian elections. Also, Russia invited international observers from 36 countries (including 30 national parliaments, as well as 5 international organizations) to monitor the Russian elections. Whereas Zelensky has reached the end of his term, yet why hasn't he called for fresh elections in Ukraine to choose a new President?
    1
  13937.  @rebelmango2141  "Rusich is authoritarian Ukraine isn't also they didn't have economic growth before" Russia has successfully conducted its elections in March 2024. Apart from Putin, there were 3 other candidates on the ballot paper to vote for in the Russian elections. Whereas Zelensky has reached the end of his term, yet why hasn't he called for fresh elections in Ukraine to choose a new President?
    1
  13938.  @rebelmango2141  "Because you don't cave to blackmail as the saying goes give them an inch they'll take a mile." What give an inch they'll take a mile? Ukraine literally held more territory under Yanukovych (your so-called Russian stooge) that they do under Zelensky today. During Yankovych time, Ukraine controlled Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporizka and Kherson._ But under Zelensky today they are under Russian control so are you sure Zelensky's doing the right thing? Yanukovych was the last time Ukraine elected a president that actually cared for Ukraine's interest, why can't I bring him up?
    1
  13939.  @rebelmango2141  "Because you don't cave to blackmail as the saying goes give them an inch they'll take a mile." What give an inch they'll take a mile? Ukraine literally held more territory under Yanukovych (your so-called Russian stooge) that they do under Zelensky today. During Yankovych time, Ukraine controlled Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporizka and Kherson._ But under Zelensky today they are under Russian control so under which president has Ukraine lost more territory? Certainly not Yanukovych, he was the last time Ukraine elected a president that actually cared for Ukraine's interests.
    1
  13940.  @rebelmango2141  "Because you don't cave to blackmail as the saying goes give them an inch they'll take a mile." What give an inch they'll take a mile? Ukraine literally held more territory under Yanukovych (your so-called Russian stooge) that they do under Zelensky today. During Yankovych time, Ukraine controlled Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporizka and Kherson._ So under which president has Ukraine lost more territory? Certainly not Yanukovych, he was the last time Ukraine elected a president that actually cared for Ukraine's interests.
    1
  13941.  @rebelmango2141  "Because you don't cave to blackmail as the saying goes give them an inch they'll take a mile." What give an inch they'll take a mile? Ukraine literally held more territory under Yanukovych (your so-called Russian stooge) that they do under Zelensky today. During Yankovych time, Ukraine controlled Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporizka and Kherson._ But under Zelensky today they are under Russia so which president made Ukraine lose more territory?
    1
  13942.  @rebelmango2141  "Zelensky capitulating isn't what the population wants but good Russian talking points" Prove it, how you know that's what the population wants? The Ukrainian Army is so short of manpower that conscription squads are resorting to pressing people on the streets into service in the frontline. You claim that Ukraine is a democracy, well why don't Zelensky call for fresh elections to see if the Ukrainians want him for another term?
    1
  13943.  @rebelmango2141  So the Soviet Union claiming Crimea is illegal imperialism, but then transferring Crimea to Ukraine is legal and therefore not imperialism? How does this make sense? It's thanks to the Soviet Union that Ukraine has a claim to Crimea, yet you're claiming one is imperialism and one isn't?
    1
  13944.  @rebelmango2141  You called Yanukovych a Russian stooge, then can you explain why is it under his presidency, Ukraine held more territory than they do today under Zelensky? During Yankovych time, Ukraine controlled Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporizka, Kherson, but Ukraine no longer does so under Zelensky, so how is this give an inch they'll take a mile?
    1
  13945.  @rebelmango2141  "Rusich is authoritarian Ukraine isn't also they didn't have economic growth before" Russia has successfully conducted its elections in March 2024. Apart from Putin, there were 3 other candidates on the ballot paper to vote for in the Russian elections. Also, Russia invited international observers from 36 countries (including 30 national parliaments, as well as 5 international organizations) to monitor the Russian elections. Whereas Zelensky has reached the end of his term, yet why hasn't he called for fresh elections in Ukraine to choose a new President?
    1
  13946.  @rebelmango2141  "Because you don't cave to blackmail as the saying goes give them an inch they'll take a mile." What give an inch they'll take a mile? Ukraine literally held more territory under Yanukovych (your so-called Russian stooge) that they do under Zelensky today. During Yankovych time, Ukraine controlled Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporizka and Kherson._ But under Zelensky today they are under Russian control so are you sure Zelensky's doing the right thing? Yanukovych was the last time Ukraine elected a president that actually cared for Ukraine's interest, why can't I bring him up?
    1
  13947.  @rebelmango2141  "Rusich is authoritarian Ukraine isn't also they didn't have economic growth before" Russia has successfully conducted its elections in March 2024. Apart from Putin, there were 3 other candidates on the ballot paper to vote for in the Russian elections. Also, Russia invited international observers from 36 countries (including 30 national parliaments, as well as 5 international organizations) to monitor the Russian elections. Whereas Zelensky has reached the end of his term, yet why hasn't he called for fresh elections in Ukraine to choose a new President?
    1
  13948.  @rebelmango2141  "Because you don't cave to blackmail as the saying goes give them an inch they'll take a mile." What give an inch they'll take a mile? Ukraine literally held more territory under Yanukovych (your so-called Russian stooge) that they do under Zelensky today. During Yankovych time, Ukraine controlled Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporizka and Kherson._ But under Zelensky today they are under Russian control so are you sure Zelensky's doing the right thing? Yanukovych was the last time Ukraine elected a president that actually cared for Ukraine's interest, why can't I bring him up?
    1
  13949.  @rebelmango2141  Russia invited international observers from 36 countries, (including 30 national parliaments, as well as five international organizations) to come to Russia and monitor the presidential election. Whereas Zelensky hasn't called for fresh elections.
    1
  13950.  @rebelmango2141  So you're saying that Zelensky can postpone elections indefinitely? Then how can people claim Ukraine is a democracy when Zelensky can postpone elections indefinitely? The longer that Ukrainian citizens cannot take part in elections, as either voters or candidates, the more this will undermine the legitimacy of Zelensky's government.
    1
  13951.  @rebelmango2141  "Yeah and under Yanukovych they were a vassal state" They had sovereignty under Yanukovych, held control over Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, as well as the ability to pursue policies that were beneficial to Ukraine. But their sovereignty was lost after the 2014 Maidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) ousting Yanukovych, and installing a US pupet government in its place. Now Ukraine is being encouraged by NATO to fight Russia, even though Ukraine stands no chance of entering NATO.
    1
  13952.  @rebelmango2141  "Everything described is happening in Russia regarding conscription." Russia hasn't had the need to mobilize additional troops since 2022, whereas Ukraine is still mobilizing troops in 2024, through conscription squads pressing people on the streets into service in the frontline. Many Ukrainians are fleeing overseas to escape being drafted into the frontline.
    1
  13953.  @rebelmango2141  "It's more than just about territory also sovereignty" Sovereignty? Ukraine lost that during the 2014 Maidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) with the ousting of Yanukovych. We know this from audio recordings of Victoria Nuland talking to Geoffrey Pyatt on who will be the next leader of Ukraine. The candidate they approved of ended up becoming the next president, so since then, Ukraine has never had agency. Whereas during Yanukovych time, Ukraine had both territory as well as sovereignty to pursue its own policies beneficial for Ukraine.
    1
  13954.  @rebelmango2141  Rusich is authoritarian Ukraine isn't also they didn't have economic growth before" Russia has successfully conducted its elections in March 2024. Apart from Putin, there were 3 other candidates on the ballot paper to vote for in the Russian elections. Also, Russia invited international observers from 36 countries (including 30 national parliaments, as well as 5 international organizations) to monitor the Russian elections. Whereas Zelensky has reached the end of his term, yet why hasn't he called for fresh elections in Ukraine to choose a new President?
    1
  13955.  @rebelmango2141  "Because you don't cave to blackmail as the saying goes give them an inch they'll take a mile." What give an inch they'll take a mile? Ukraine literally held more territory under Yanukovych (your so-called Russian stooge) that they do under Zelensky today. During Yankovych time, Ukraine controlled Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporizka and Kherson._ But under Zelensky today they are under Russian control so are you sure Zelensky's doing the right thing? Yanukovych was the last time Ukraine elected a president that actually cared for Ukraine's interest, why can't I bring him up?
    1
  13956.  @rebelmango2141  Rusich is authoritarian Ukraine isn't also they didn't have economic growth before" Russia has successfully conducted its elections in March 2024. Apart from Putin, there were 3 other candidates on the ballot paper to vote for in the Russian elections. Also, Russia invited international observers from 36 countries (including 30 national parliaments, as well as 5 international organizations) to monitor the Russian elections. Whereas Zelensky has reached the end of his term, yet why hasn't he called for fresh elections in Ukraine to choose a new President?
    1
  13957.  @rebelmango2141  "Because you don't cave to blackmail as the saying goes give them an inch they'll take a mile." What give an inch they'll take a mile? Ukraine literally held more territory under Yanukovych (your so-called Russian stooge) that they do under Zelensky today. During Yankovych time, Ukraine controlled Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporizka and Kherson._ But under Zelensky today they are under Russian control so are you sure Zelensky's doing the right thing? Yanukovych was the last time Ukraine elected a president that actually cared for Ukraine's interest, why can't I bring him up?
    1
  13958.  @rebelmango2141  "Because you don't cave to blackmail as the saying goes give them an inch they'll take a mile." What give an inch they'll take a mile? Ukraine literally held more territory under Yanukovych (your so-called Russian stooge) that they do under Zelensky today. During Yankovych time, Ukraine controlled Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporizka and Kherson._ But under Zelensky today they are under Russian control so are you sure Zelensky's doing the right thing? Yanukovych was the last time Ukraine elected a president that actually cared for Ukraine's interest, why can't I bring him up?
    1
  13959.  @rebelmango2141  "Because you don't cave to blackmail as the saying goes give them an inch they'll take a mile." What give an inch they'll take a mile? Ukraine literally held more territory under Yanukovych (your so-called Russian stooge) that they do under Zelensky today. During Yankovych time, Ukraine controlled Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporizka and Kherson._ But under Zelensky today they are under Russian control so are you sure Zelensky's doing the right thing? Yanukovych was the last time Ukraine elected a president that actually cared for Ukraine's interest, why can't I bring him up?
    1
  13960.  @rebelmango2141  "Because you don't cave to blackmail as the saying goes give them an inch they'll take a mile." What give an inch they'll take a mile? Ukraine literally held more territory under Yanukovych (your so-called Russian stooge) that they do under Zelensky today. During Yankovych time, Ukraine controlled Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporizka and Kherson._ But under Zelensky today they are under Russian control so are you sure Zelensky's doing the right thing? Yanukovych was the last time Ukraine elected a president that actually cared for Ukraine's interest, why can't I bring him up?
    1
  13961. The Xí 习 in Xí Jìnpíng 习近平 is actually closer to "See".
    1
  13962. Sapak chuyun Use Google translate or some other Chinese pinyin pronouncing program. Xi sounds closer to "C" or "See" than "She".
    1
  13963.  @sofiyagrober2180  Of course it's a myth. There is no real Russian soldier called "General Winter", but nevertheless, the winter season plays a role and contributes substantially to the military failures of both Napoleon's and Hitler's invasions of Russia. The difference is that Russians fundamentally understand (and also respect) the winter conditions during warfare, and have used the season to their advantage, compared to the Western Europeans often failing to factor winter into their strategies. Now, "General Winters" is going to pay the Europe a visit, and unless the EU can get their winter preparations in order, things are not going to end well for them.
    1
  13964. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  13965. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  13966. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  13967. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms whereas Chinese President Xi Jinping is only entering his 3rd term.
    1
  13968. Chinese President Xi Jinping is only entering his 3rd term in office, whereas German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms and would have done a 5th.
    1
  13969. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  13970. According to its constitution, Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  13971. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  13972. I don't think the Ukrainian Neptune cruise missiles hit the Russian cruiser Moskva, otherwise why are there no crew casualties and that that the crew could safely evacuate the ship?
    1
  13973.  @LouisTsuiful  Agreed. On 17 November, Peng Shuai wrote an email to WTA claiming that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent, so this checks in with her latest statement that the allegations of sexual assault are false.
    1
  13974. @Baldassare "She doesnt have a choice, she had to pretend that she is trying to lay low." Do you have evidence she doesn't have a choice and that she had to pretend she is trying to lay low? She has expressed a desire for personal privacy during the video call with IOC, but the WTA are behaving like the paparazzi and trying to dig up details of her private life, instead of respecting her wish for privacy.
    1
  13975.  @strnglhld  "Wrong. She specifically said that he forced her to have sex without her consent. Try again." I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and she had previously known Zhang Gaoli seven years ago, before he became a Politburo Standing Committee member and they had sex before. Three years ago they met up and have sex again and it was consensual. She wrote: You said in those seven years, you never forgot about me, and you will treat me well etc... I was terrified and anxious. Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well. So according to Peng Shuai's post, the sex was consensual so where did she said that he forced her to have sex with him without consent? That's why Peng Shuai is denying the allegations of sexual assault, because there were none in her post.
    1
  13976.  @lodzalater8169  Did you read Peng Shuai's post (full version available on Reddit)? Where are the allegations of sexual assault in her post? Could you point it out to me?
    1
  13977. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  13978. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  13979. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution,
    1
  13980. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  13981. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  13982. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms while Chinese President Xi is entering his 3rd term.
    1
  13983.  @JackRichardsonM8  More like by NATO's expansion right up to Russia's doorstep.
    1
  13984. 老实说翻墙之后就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  13985. China has done much to develop Africa's infrastructure in the short span of a few decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  13986. Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongolians conquer Tibet and Song dynasty China and made them part of Yuan Dynasty China.
    1
  13987. Many Chinese hold optimistic attitudes and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    1
  13988. There is a video on YouTube by Chinese Ministry Of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) where spokesperson Hua Chunying states that BBC is NOT TRUSTED even in the UK, but YouTube automatically deletes my comment if I post the youtube link. Search on YouTube for "MOFA: BBC is not trusted even in the UK" by CGTN.
    1
  13989.  @tomtube1012  I too, tried to post YouTube link to video by CGTN where Ministry Of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) spokesperson Hua Chunying states "BBC is NOT TRUSTED even in the UK", but YouTube automatically deletes my comment if I post the link.
    1
  13990. America has never been ever more divided than before. Whether it's between the Democrats and the Republicans, or those who are pro-Trump or against Trump, or the Left Wing or Right Wing (till today, I still don't understand the definition of those terms), Americans are drifting further and further apart from each other, when this virus calls for unity instead.
    1
  13991. Agreed, the government is more like Imperial China, where an emperor ruled the country with a royal court of advisors at his side.
    1
  13992. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  13993. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  13994. Even the United States recognizes that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  13995. Countries all over the globe acknowledge the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  13996. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  13997. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  13998. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  13999. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  14000. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14001. @gregpeterson3144 China has the world's largest smartphone market by number of users, so in time, the ecosystem of apps will start to develop for HarmonyOS and it doesn't really matter that the OS has no share in the U.S, given how massive the market in China is.
    1
  14002. Chinese workers help manufacture products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, clothing, toys, shoes, sneakers, to help lower the cost of living in other countries. Think of the billions of dollars people in other countries saved over the years on living expenses thanks to affordable Chinese goods. If we consider trade barriers and tariffs, the fact is that the USA is the most protectionist country in the world, with over 800 of such protectionist policies, whereas China has only about 200-300 of such policies.
    1
  14003. Tibet is part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty. Tibet broke free of China in 1913 but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951 so why should China give up our ancestral lands?
    1
  14004.  @beahumanbeingfirst  Xinjiang was part of China since before Islam itself was born and it was known as Xiyu (西域) under the Han dynasty. Older English-language reference works often refer to Xinjiang as "Chinese Turkestan" and the name "East Turkestan" is a fake name created by Russian sinologist Hyacinth to replace the term "Chinese Turkestan" in 1829. Who gives these foreigners the right to rename historically Chinese territory?
    1
  14005.  @thisiskevin1000  New Zealand followed a zero Covid policy, and they cited Covid-19 as the reason but China has a zero Covid-19 policy just like NZ, so what's the excuse for NZ then?
    1
  14006. North Korea isn't really targeting Chinese cities, so the government sees no need to "stop" North Korea. North Korea targets US military bases in South Korea and Okinawa Japan, so why not USA withdraw its forces from those regions instead? That would probably do much more to reduce tensions along Korean peninsula than any sanction China could ever impose on North Korea. Its obvious that sanctions aren't working, so why not try a different approach instead?
    1
  14007. +자유로운 영혼 "China illegally invaded Korea during the Korean civil war" then USA also illegally invaded Korea during Korean Civil War. After Japanese surrender, Korea was divided into North (Soviet Union) and South (USA) and N. Korea wanted to unify this humiliating divide, and N. Korea almost succeeded (90% unified) but then USA joined in illegally and push N. Korea back to China's doorstep (Liaoning province). So the People's Liberation Army joined in and push USA and S. Korea back to 38 parallel (line of separation between N. and S. Korea) So PLA did not venture past 38 parallel and set foot on S. Korean soil as far as I know.
    1
  14008.  @abhijitsen2197  China is home to many of the world's largest banks such as _ Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, China Construction Bank, Agricultural Bank of China, Bank of China, Postal Savings Bank of China, Bank of Communications, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank (China), China Minsheng Bank, Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, China CITIC Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Huaxia Bank, Bank of Beijing, China Guangfa Bank, Bank of Shanghai, Bank of Jiangsu, China Zheshang Bank_ and many more. Here's a List of the Number of banks in the top 100 by total assets: 1. China (19 banks) 2. United States (11 banks) 3. Japan (8 banks) 4. United Kingdom (6 banks), France (6 banks), South Korea (6 banks) 5. Canada (5 banks), Germany (5 banks) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of largest banks But where are the famous banks in India as compared to China?
    1
  14009.  @abhijitsen2197  Learn what from India? Earlier you boasted that Indian digital platforms growing at a faster rate than China, but you failed to even name a company from India that compares to Chinese companies like Alibaba, Tencent, Huawei, Xiaomi, DJI, yet you still want China to learn from India? Learn what?
    1
  14010.  @abhijitsen2197  Earlier you said: "megaproject many of them have failed," but which Chinese megaproject do you claim have failed? For example, China is home to the world's largest high-speed network, surpassing even the Japanese Shinkansen in terms of track length. Our high speed trains are fast, the journeys smooth and enjoyable, and passengers even balanced coins while the train is traveling at 350 kmph. Here's a List of countries by High Speed Rail Length in 2019: 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. France (3,870 km) 4. Germany (3,596 km) 5. Japan (3,422 km) 6. Russia (2,026 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,997 km) 8. Italy (1,697 km) 9. South Korea (1,481 km) 10. Finland (744 km) ... Source: YouTube: High-Speed Railway (HSR) Construction by Country (1965-2019)
    1
  14011.  @abhijitsen2197  "神州 Shenzhou what you are claiming is true, but please find out if your railway project is making profits," That's because of socialist policies to keep our train fares low and affordable to the masses, that's why our railway companies are not turning a profit at the moment. Capitalism seeks to extract a profit from workers and customers, but socialism aims to make life better for the people. Look at the rich capitalist Western countries like in United Kingdom for example, the subway fare in London (London Underground) is quite expensive for London commuters because the companies need to make profits. You said: "if sealink to Hongkong is being used as projected," The Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge is a long term project to connect those 3 major cities on the Pearl River Delta, and the usage of the bridge peaked in May 2019 with a flow of 148,546 vehicles*, while December 2018 saw the highest number of passenger trips – *2,217,855 – via the Hong Kong port, so what makes you think the bridge is not being utilized? You said: "tourism have failed last three years," Tourism failed everywhere for the last three years because of the pandemic, yet why do you single out China? You said: "out of country projects like Cpak in Pakistan" The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has generated around 75,000 jobs for locals in Pakistan. Chinese labor makes only 17.5% of the total number of labor currently working on CPEC while 82.5% labor included Pakistani citizens. So how is CPEC a failure?
    1
  14012.  @abhijitsen2197  "神州 Shenzhou learn how to live with freedom, learn how a free mind thinks," What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, before 2019, everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting their lands and spending coin on their tourist industries. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students studying the same topics as their local peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, DJI, etc, are expanding overseas, whereas you earlier boasted that Indian digital platforms growing at a faster rate than China, but you failed to even name a company from India that compares with Chinese tech firms, then why are you telling China to learn from India? You said: "China is slowly becoming a failed state." Previously China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving in the past, much like India. But fast forward till today and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made-in-China) having world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military expenditure. And it was all achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, so what failed state are you talking about? You said: "learn to find out the true strength of the self. Learn to find the light within you." Ask you this question: Why India followed Western-style democracy, yet they are unable to surpass China under the CPC? India is world's 2nd largest population so your workforce is comparable to China's. Republic of India 🇮🇳 was founded in 1947, 2 years earlier than the founding of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949. Many Indians speak English (preferable for Westerners) whereas many Chinese today still struggle with English. India is Western democracy, China isn't. Yet despite all these advantages, why is India unable to surpass China? You tell me to find the light, but you can't even name any Indian company that compares to Chinese companies, why is that so?
    1
  14013.  @abhijitsen2197  How am I to accept what you said, when you can't even name any company from India that compares to the likes of Chinese companies like Alibaba, Tencent, Xiaomi, Huawei, DJI, etc? Look, China has even sent people into space for crying out loud. In October 2003, Yang Liwei (杨利伟) became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program through Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. This made China the third country to independently send humans into space after the USA and the Soviet Union. Yet you still claim China needs to learn from India? Learn what? Chinese tourists have been all over the world, every country has heard of them in their lands. Many Chinese students have studied overseas in other countries, and when they come home to the mainland, they bring their knowledge with them back to China. Yet you just claim China is becoming a failed state? Based on what?
    1
  14014.  @abhijitsen2197  Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. Yet you're claiming China is "only being number one in population with no contribution"?
    1
  14015.  @abhijitsen2197  With the Chinese invention of paper came other Chinese paper inventions like paper lanterns, paper umbrellas, and even the paper banknote. Paper money made business transactions easier since merchants need not carry around lots of metal coinage and precious gems to serve as currency) Mankind's first aviation was in the form of paper kites and hot air balloons, that were first invented in China. As for Ink, the so-called "India Ink" was actually invented in China, yet it was only named Indian Ink because of the British. Since you brought up Indian introducing zero, well did you know that Chinese mathematicians invented negative numbers? Negative numbers appear for the first time in history in the Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art 《九章算術》 which in its present form dates from the period of the Han Dynasty (202 BC – 220 AD). The mathematician Liu Hui (c. 3rd century) established rules for the addition and subtraction of negative numbers. Yet you claim China is "only being number one in population with no contribution"?
    1
  14016.  @abhijitsen2197  Not just negative numbers, but Chinese mathematicians also made numerous contributions to algebra, geometry, number theory and trigonometry. For example, the oldest known decimal multiplication tables (using a base of 10) are the Tsinghua Bamboo Slips (清华简) written on bamboo strips dating to about 305 BC, during China's Warring States period. In the calculations of Pi (π), Chinese mathematicians approximated π to 7 digits In the 5th century AD, while Indian mathematicians made a 5 digit approximation. Chinese astronomers also contributed to mankind's understanding of the heavens above. For example, the supernova which created the Crab Nebula (now known as SN 1054) was observed by ancient Chinese astronomers and recorded, but it is absent in Islamic and Indian texts. Yet you claim China is "only being number one in population with no contribution"?
    1
  14017.  @abhijitsen2197  Numbers were derived from Arabic, and the origins of algebra can be traced to the ancient Babylonians. Besides negative numbers and multiplications tables, Chinese mathematicians also developed the determinant, that's used in matrix multiplication. Determinants were first used in the Chinese mathematics textbook The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art 《九章算術》 Chinese scholars, around the 3rd century BCE. Even the Gaussian elimination method in mathematics was invented in China in Chapter Eight: Rectangular Arrays of this book. Chinese astronomers made numerous contributions to mankind's understanding of the heavens above. The Chinese astronomer Geng Shouchang of the Han Dynasty (202 BC – 220 AD) invented the Armillary Sphere (known as celestial globes 渾象) in China in 52 BC, to assist the observation of the stars and in aiding calendrical computations and calculations. The Han dynasty polymath Zhang Heng (78–139 AD) was the first to apply motive power to the rotating armillary sphere by a set of complex gears rotated by a waterwheel which in turn was powered by the constant pressure head of an inflow clepsydra clock, the latter of which he improved with an extra compensating tank between the reservoir and the inflow vessel. Yet you claim China is "only being number one in population with no contribution"? Also, Gautama Buddha himself was born in Nepal (Lumbini), not India. China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Egypt, Mesopotamia and even Rome has succumbed to history.
    1
  14018.  @abhijitsen2197  You're referring to British economist Angus Maddison's graph of Global Contribution to World's GDP by major economies from year 1 to 2003? In that graph, China's controlled 26% - 35% of the world's economy from 1-1800 AD. Britain was colonial power during the 19th Century but was eventually overtaken by the United States in 20th Century after WWII. But if you pay attention to the end of the graph, it looks as though China is all set to dominate the 21st Century according to Angus Maddison's graph. Yet earlier you claim China had no contribution, and that China is slowly becoming a failed state? Even today, Chinese astronomers are continuing the tradition of contributing to mankind's understanding of the heavens above. For example, China is home to the world's largest radio telescope, known as FAST (Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope) and nicknamed Tianyan (天眼,) "Eye of the Heavens" to scan the celestial heavens for signs of extraterrestrial life.
    1
  14019.  @abhijitsen2197  Buddhism isn't even popular in India, (it's mostly Hindu and Islam today) and many Buddhist shrines, monasteries, icons have been destroyed in India, whereas it thrived in China after arriving from Nepal. And while there is surviving archaeological evidence of Babylonian mathematicians in the form of clay tablets (like you said), there is no physical archaeological evidence of the Ramayana myth at the moment. You said: "You have wiped out your values from the past. Sorry." Could you explain how has China wiped out our values from the past? Take ancient writing scripts for examples and Chinese characters constitute arguably the oldest continuously used system of writing in the world, having been used since 1200 BC. Today, Mandarin Chinese is the world's most spoken language by number of speakers, whereas other ancient langauges like Egyptian Hieroglyphs, Sumerian Cuneiform (i.e Mesopotamia language) and Latin (spoken in Rome) are considered "dead langauges" since they are no longer "alive and evolving" with the times, and no new words been added into their vocabularies.
    1
  14020.  @abhijitsen2197  Usage of Mandarin Chinese is only going to grow further with the rise/return of China back to it's previous superpower status. Not bad for an ancient language of a civilization like China's to survive the passage of time to see widespread modern use today. Archaeologists have uncovered ancient Chinese characters (Oracle Bone Script) since 1200 BC, whereas in comparison the earliest Sanskrit inscriptions date only to around 100 BC. And for all your claims of astronomical observations, there is no archaeological uncovered evidence for the Ramayana today. Also, what makes you claim China's values from the past have been wiped out? China is home to many historical monuments, such as the Great Wall of China, the Forbidden City, the First Emperor's Tomb (Qin Tomb), the Grand Canal (world's longest artificial river) and many more historical monuments. According to UNESCO World Heritage, China ranks 2nd in the world in number of UNESCO Heritage sites at 56 sites, just behind Italy. World Heritage Sites by country (as of July 2021): 1. Italy (58 sites) 2. China (56 sites) 3. Germany (51 sites) 4. France (49 sites) 5. Spain (49 sites) 6. India (40 sites) 7. Mexico (36 sites) 8. United Kingdom (33 sites) 9. Russia (30 sites) 10. Iran (26 sites) ... Source: UNESCO World Heritage Site
    1
  14021.  @abhijitsen2197  Every language was spoken from a very long time back, and this includes old Chinese. The earliest confirmed evidence of the Chinese script yet discovered is the body of inscriptions carved on bronze vessels and oracle bones from the late Shang dynasty (c. 1250–1050 BC). The earliest of these is dated to around 1200 BC. But the earliest archaeological evidence of Sanskrit dates back to around 207 AD. Additionally, India wasn't the first place Sanskrit was recorded, it was Syria. You said: "The Indus valley civilization script cannot be read." The Indus Valley Civilization forms much of modern day Pakistan, not India. India has recognized Pakistan as its own country separate from India, just like Gautama Buddha was born in Nepal, not India. Not only are there Chinese historical monuments like the Great Wall, Forbidden City, Terracotta Army, but silk was much throughout the ancient world, so much such that a lucrative trading route had sprouted, spanning across Eurasian and the route was named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, porcelain (aka fine china) that was in great demand throughout the ancient world.
    1
  14022.  @abhijitsen2197  If you look up depictions of ancient Chinese clothing, our nobility wore luxurious silk robes with long flowing sleeves since the 4th millennium BC, and this material was so popular throughout the ancient world that Chinese silk was in high demand throughout the rest of the world. Chinese Hanfu (汉服) have even inspired other East Asian country's clothing like the Japanese kimono and the Korean hanbok.
    1
  14023.  @abhijitsen2197  Much of the Indus Valley Civilization is located in modern day Pakistan (which India has recognized as being a separate country from themselves) so you're praising that the ancient Pakistani were cultured and advanced? Then Pakistan has much to be proud of the Indus Valley civilization, which is part of their history after all. Like Pakistan, China has thousands of years of history and employed advanced drainage systems. -The latest archaeological discoveries found that the Chinese used drainage system in urban areas at least 2,200 years ago, since the discovery of a 2,200-year old sewage system in Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, the capital city of Qin Dynasty (221 BC – 206 BC). -A section of a sewage pipe in the photo was discovered when Chinese archaeologists unearthed a Han Dynasty (221BC – 206AD) city site in Chongqing’s Yongchuan District. The remaining area of the ancient city measures about 400,000 sqm. -During the technically most advanced Song Dynasty (960 – 1279), Chongqing had 18 major water stations serving the metropolis’ water supply and drainage needs. -A long-buried Tang Dynasty garden has been excavated in mid-July 2012 in Chengdu at a construction site. The unearthed elements of the more than 1,000-year-old garden include 18 ancient tombs, 1 pond, 1 well, a number of Buddhist statues and ceramics articles, as well as a 90-m long drainage tunnel. The winding drainage was built with bricks, 1,6 m in depth with width vary from about 6 m to less than 1 m. Source: View Of China: Advanced drainage System in the Ancient Beijing
    1
  14024.  @abhijitsen2197  So by your own words, you admit that there is current no physical archaeological evidence of Sanskrit existing earlier than 207 AD. Whereas Chinese characters (Oracle Bone Script) have been uncovered since 1200 BC, and there are even earlier archaeological evidence. For example, the Jiahu Symbols (贾湖契刻符号) which consist of 16 distinct markings on prehistoric artifacts found in Jiahu, a neolithic Peiligang culture site found in Henan, China, and excavated in 1989. The Jiahu symbols are dated to around 6000 BC, even earlier than the Oracle Bone Script (1200 BC) Also, there is also no archaeological evidence that the Ramayana is anything more than a myth at the moment.
    1
  14025.  @abhijitsen2197  So it appears we are in agreement that the earliest written script of Sanskrit dates back to around 207 AD, whereas Chinese characters have existed since 1200 BC. Also, Sanskrit today is considered dead language, since it's no longer evolving with the times, and no new words have been added to its vocabulary. Much like other dead languages like Egyptian Hieroglyphs, Sumerian Cuneiform and Latin (used in Roman Empire). Whereas Chinese characters are still widely used today by 1.4 billion people, and is alive and evolving with the times. New characters and new words are being added to Chinese vocabulary as Chinese continue to speak and write, and refine our language. I personally think that it's an achievement for an ancient civilization language to survive to modern times and continue to grow. Also, much of the Indus Valley Civilization lies in Pakistan (a country that India has recognized as being separate from itself). A huge chunk of the Indus River literally flows through Pakistan, so Pakistan has every right to be proud as birthplace of the Indus Valley Civilization. You said: "Do you know that your Chinese traveller took back a elephant and a big load of books, no gold ,silver, diamond nothing. That shows China had many things to learn from India." Correction: from Pakistan not India, since the majority of Indus Valley Civilization lies in Pakistan, and India has long recognized Pakistan as a separate country from India. Just like Gautama Buddha was born in Nepal and Buddhism arrived in China from that country, not from India, where Indian Buddhism is almost non-existent (compared to Hinduism and Islam).
    1
  14026.  @abhijitsen2197  You said: "To coexist we believe all living beings are the same, we are not superior." I have met Indians online that do not espouse those views, they seem to think Indians are superior to others (especially against Chinese). Such Indians boasted about: "Indian digital platforms growing at a faster rate than China." yet when questioned about which Indian company can compare to Alibaba, Tencent, Huawei, Xiaomi, DJI they gone all silent. They also claim many of China's mega projects are failing, that "China is slowly becoming a failed state." that China has lost all our values, and China has number one population but made no contributions. Such people are clearly anti-China in nature. No matter what I say, these people constantly look down on China's achievements while they have nothing substantial to support their arguments.
    1
  14027.  @abhijitsen2197  But it's clearly an empty boast, not criticism. Even after I asked which company from India can compare with the likes of Alibaba, Tencent, Huawei, Xiaomi, DJI, etc all I've received is silence. Such Indians look down on Chinese as inferior, they ridicule Tik Tok and DJI drones as "toys", and they claim China is becoming failed state, that China lost all our values, that China is number one in population but with no contribution, how is this criticism even productive? Look, almost every positive achievement I've made about China, such Indians twist it into a negative portrayal of China, wouldn't you say such Indians are anti-China? You said: "Our problem with China is in the border, you have entered into our territory." Indian PM Narendra Modi has publicly stated that Chinese troops did not enter Indian territory, and that no outposts were taken in a public address, so why are you claiming China entered into Indian territory? You said: "Otherwise if we get together the World will be on their knees and obey." Such an arrogant "superior" attitude that you want the rest of the world to obey you. Aren't you contradicting yourself when you said: "To coexist we believe all living beings are the same, we are not superior."?
    1
  14028.  @abhijitsen2197  "神州 Shenzhou India gave away permanent un sit to China, treated you as brother but in 1962 you attacked India." Wrong, the permanent seats were for the UN's 5 founding members (i.e United States, United Kingdom, France, Russia and China) and China's seat wasn't India's to give away. Also before 1962, Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai had visited New Delhi and proposed the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence (和平共处五项原则) to Indian PM Nehru to define Sino-Indian relations. But instead of sitting down to negotiation, Nehru pursued an aggressive "Forward Policy" of building 60 military outposts at our disputed border. There were even 43 Indian military outposts that were built beyond the internationally recognized border, and onto actual Chinese territory. Having exhausted all peaceful options, China had no choice but to defend our sovereignty.
    1
  14029.  @abhijitsen2197  Indian PM Jawaharlal Nehru had recognised Tibet as part of China then how is Tibet the reason for war? Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    1
  14030.  @abhijitsen2197  According to ThePrint: India never had an offer to become permanent UNSC member — this is a fact. The BJP is now propagating an old theory that Nehru declined an offer to join the UNSC as a permanent member and “gifted” the spot to China. This theory, which often finds mention in common talk, is without any basis. The simple fact is that no official offer was ever made to Nehru or the Indian government to become a permanent member of the UNSC. At best, there were ideas, floated by US officials, which suffered premature deaths. Also, Indian PM Nehru had the aggressive "Forward Policy" that built 60 Indian military outposts at [he disputed border with China, with 43 of those outposts extending beyond the internationally recognised border and into actual Chinese territory. So China had no choice but to defend our sovereign territory.
    1
  14031.  @miracleman8022  "神州 Shenzhou mao killed a lot of people brotha." It was Chinese Civil War, of course Chinese were killing Chinese. Just like during the American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans. Or Vietnamese killing Vietnamese during Vietnam War. Or Koreans during Korean War or any civil war for that matter.
    1
  14032.  @nightmark2120  You said: "Where's your proof about Filipinos inside mainland China working?" Figures from the Philippines government in 2009 shows that mainland China has become the top destination for Filipino maids seeking work overseas as Chinese families are willing to employ them for better household services and for their fluency in the English language. Based on records from the Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs, there were about 12,254 overseas Filipinos in mainland China. Most of them live in cities such as Beijing (2,492), Chongqing (164), Guangzhou (4,564), Shanghai (4,264) and Xiamen (7,707). As for Hong Kong, Filipinos constitute the largest ethnic minority in Hong Kong, numbering approximately 140,000, many of whom work as foreign domestic helpers. You said: "I can whole heartedly say if Filipinos or asean community choose between China or US they will US, it's not even close." China is literally the largest trading partner of many ASEAN countries. In the Philippines, China and USA each make up around 15% of total Filipino exports. Furthermore, it's not China that's forcing the Philipines to choose, it's the USA that's forcing Philippines to pick one and not the other.
    1
  14033.  @nightmark2120  It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. Many experts predict that China's economy is going to surpass the United State's economy sometime in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, China is not the one forcing ASEAN to pick a side, whereas the U.S is the one forcing ASEAN countries to pick a side and ASEAN countries choose not to.
    1
  14034. +Shivish Shukla So... why can't someone who's neither Pakistani nor Chinese nor Indian, yet still express support for China, based on the figures shown from this video? Must they be Pakistani to do so? Why can't people here make their own choice, base on given facts and figures, regardless of whatever nationalities they are?
    1
  14035.  @alvaro0317  Which part of our vast country of China did you visit?
    1
  14036. +Robert Hardy The thing about polls is that they can change. Taiwan political parties are colour coded, with BLUE representing those in favor of eventual reunification with the mainland (such as KMT) and GREEN representing those in favor of independence (such as DPP). Polls can always shift around according to public perception, and who knows maybe the voting with favor BLUE again one day. Or People's Republic of China could simply send more mainlanders to Taiwan's demographic and slowly skew the votes in favor of BLUE.
    1
  14037.  @YuuSHiiiN  Agreed. Previously before Tsai came to power, Taiwan had warm relations with the mainland under Ma Ying-jeou, only with Tsai did relations between the mainland and Taiwan deteriorate to our current level.
    1
  14038. Video: Facts tell: Hubei's three steps to recover from Covid-19 youtu.be/s80M55LUfLw?t=100 If you're the owner of a small business, the government will reduce your taxes and ensure your profits are maximised. The government will also actively help you resume production and recover to levels before the outbreak as soon as possible.
    1
  14039.  @Leiska86  "Shenzhou. How is NATO not a defensive alliance?" In 1999, NATO attacked Yugoslavia even though Yugoslavia did not invade any NATO countries. Article 9 has not been trigged in any way, so how then is NATO considered a defensive alliance?
    1
  14040.  HellBlazerMNE07  "It was formed because of the atrocities the Soviet Union (Russia) was committing and to be a defense against it," What atrocities? The Soviet Union fought against the Nazis during WWII and Russians suffered the most casualties than any other nation (China included) during WWII. Not only that, but the Soviets also inflicted the most damage upon the Germans during WWII.
    1
  14041.  @rap3208  "Shenzhou. NATO was formed first, the Warsaw Pact was formed in answer to the NATO threat." Precisely. NATO was formed because of Soviet Union's military rise. Warsaw Pact followed later as a response to the NATO threat.
    1
  14042.  @Leiska86  That doesn't prove NATO is a defensive alliance. NATO did not have the backing of the UN Security Council to use force in Yugoslavia. Also, your claim of "unanimous support among NATO members (everyone can veto)" doesn't prove that the alliance is defensive at all. You're saying that NATO members can just vote to intervene in another country's internal affairs? That means its not defensive in nature, especially when NATO wasn't attacked in the first place.
    1
  14043.  @Leiska86  You said: "BTW, Russia gave their approval to start the bombings at the time, even though they use the conflict as an anti-NATO talking point today." Russia is not a member of NATO, so how can Russia's actions affect NATO's decision to bomb Yugoslavia? The fact remains that NATO is not a defensive organization, since they can unilaterally decide who to bomb even though no NATO members have been attacked.
    1
  14044.  @Leiska86  You said: "I'd say that's a decent track record all things considered." NATO's bombing of Yugoslavia caused damage to bridges, roads and railway tracks, as well as to 25,000 homes, 69 schools and 176 cultural monuments. Furthermore, 19 hospitals and 20 health centers were damaged, including the University Hospital Center Dr Dragiša Mišović. (Sounds like what the IDF is doing to Gaza right now) How does this even make one consider NATO a defensive organization at all?
    1
  14045.  @Leiska86  So whether Russia commented or not, the fact remains that NATO is not a defensive organization, since they can just decide to attack another country (without NATO being attacked first). Bringing up Russia or that NATO members decide among themselves whether to intervene or not, doesn't change the non-defensive nature of the alliance.
    1
  14046.  @mynick80  If Ukraine is democratic, why is Zelenskyy not going to hold an election next year? Why has Zelenskyy shut down the opposition media?
    1
  14047. ​ @mynick80  How is this a stupid question? Earlier you boasted that Ukraine is democratic and freedom of speech is well developed there, then why has Zelenskyy banned the opposition media there? Why isn't Zelenskyy holding an election next year?
    1
  14048.  @mynick80  You said: "Long term goal is democratization" So you're admitting that Ukraine is not democratic? Then why are you claiming I'm asking a stupid question?
    1
  14049. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14050. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  14051. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14052. 觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14053. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  14054. 觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  14055.  @stunningandbrave2520  Germany's Chancellor had no term limits either.
    1
  14056.  @stunningandbrave2520  China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 15-year plans, 20-year plans, etc to map out China's direction and future in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long-term planning . Whereas the U.S Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only make short-term plans instead of long-term plans (say 10 years) for America's future. This is the disadvantage of US's short-term planning.
    1
  14057.  @stunningandbrave2520  "神州 Shenzhou I like how they got rid of the "Four Olds" though." What are the Four Olds and what makes you think they are gone from China? China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest continuous civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome and Egypt have succumbed to history. China has many historical monuments, like the Great Wall of China, Forbidden City, Qin Emperor Tomb, Terracotta Army, Grand Canal (world's longest artificial river) and many more historical sites.
    1
  14058. This Cambodian multilingualist, who can speak English and Espanol, wasn't even noticed by the Western tourists (they don't care about Cambodians in general) and it was up to Chinese to notice his talent and sponsor his education.
    1
  14059.  @yslee1401  I literally gave you proof in the form of verified eye witness accounts inside Tiananmen Square testifying to the fact that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square in 4th June 1989, what more do you need? It should be remembered that Chile at that time was ruled by Gen. Augusto Pinochet, who was came to power through a coup (orchestrated by the US) in Chile, so Chile was certainly no friend of China at that time. Yet his observations indicate that no one died that night in Tiananmen Square June 1989
    1
  14060.  @yslee1401  I literally gave you proof in the form of verified eye witness accounts inside Tiananmen Square testifying to the fact that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square in 4th June 1989, what more do you need? It should be remembered that Chile at that time was ruled by Gen. Augusto Pinochet, who was pro-Washington, so Chile was certainly no friend of China at that time. Yet his observations indicate that no one died that night in Tiananmen Square June 1989
    1
  14061.  @yslee1401  I literally gave you proof in the form of verified eye witness accounts inside Tiananmen Square testifying to the fact that there was no one died inside Tiananmen Square in 4th June 1989, what more do you need? It should be remembered that Chile at that time was ruled by Gen. Augusto Pinochet, who was friendly to Washington, so the Chilean diplomat had no reason to cover up for China. Yet his observations indicate that was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square.
    1
  14062.  @yslee1401  I literally gave you proof in the form of verified eye witness accounts inside Tiananmen Square testifying to the fact that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square in 4th June 1989, what more do you need? It should be remembered that Chile at that time was ruled by Gen. Augusto Pinochet, who was pro-Washington, so Chile was certainly no friend of China at that time
    1
  14063.  @yslee1401  I already gave you proof in the form of verified eye witness accounts inside Tiananmen Square testifying to the fact that there was no one died inside Tiananmen Square in 4th June 1989, what more do you need? It should be remembered that Chile at that time was ruled by Gen. Augusto Pinochet, who was friendly to Washington, so the Chile was no friend of China's at that time.
    1
  14064.  @yslee1401  I've already given you verified eyewitness accounts testifying that no one died that night inside Tiananmen Square June 1989, what more needs to be said? It should be remembered that Chile at that time was ruled by Gen. Augusto Pinochet, who was friendly to Washington, so the Chile wasn't an ally of China at that time.
    1
  14065.  @yslee1401  I've already given you verified eyewitness accounts testifying that no one died that night inside Tiananmen Square June 1989, what more do you want? It should be noted that Chile at that time was ruled by a leader who was friendly to Washington, so the Chile wasn't an ally of China at that time.
    1
  14066.  @yslee1401  Look, I've given you verified eyewitnesses accounts whom were present inside Tiananmen Square in June 1989, and they revealed that no on died that night on 1989/06/04 inside Tiananmen Square, what more do you want? It should be noted that Chile at that time was ruled by a leader whom was friendly to Washington, and Chile wasn't an ally of China at that time.
    1
  14067.  @yslee1401  Look, I've given you verified eyewitnesses accounts whom were present inside Tiananmen Square in June 1989, and they revealed that no on died that night on 1989/06/04 inside Tiananmen Square, and that the student protestors were allowed to leave the square peacefully. It should be noted that at that time, Chile was ruled by a leader who was a US pupet, and Chile wasn't an ally of China at that time.
    1
  14068.  @yslee1401  Those verified eyewitness accounts are present there in Tiananmen Square on the day itself, how can their testimonies mean nothing? The Chilean diplomat, Reuters correspondent and Spanish TVE television crew all said that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. You said: "A video says it all" If you're referring to the Tankman video, we now know from the camera man himself that his that his widely-publicised photo was taken from his hotel window the day AFTER June 4th, and the tanks were going away from, not into, the Square. Also, if you watch the full video, the tank stopped in front of Tankman, and he climbed the tank and bashed on the tank hatch, before he was led away by a soldier.
    1
  14069.  @yslee1401  Where did he mentioned that if Tiananmen Sqaure massacre happened? He said that the students protest lasted many months and then they left. In fact, he's talking about deaths reported from riots in the US
    1
  14070.  @yslee1401  What makes you claim no video link means no proof? Clearly, there's other proof in the form of accounts by verified eyewitness present inside Tiananmen Square June 1989, that you simply refuse to accept that's all.
    1
  14071.  @yslee1401  Who are you to arbitrarily decide that video link means no proof? We already shown you eyewitness accounts, but you choose to ignore it means you refuse to look the proof in the eye that's all.
    1
  14072.  @yslee1401  I've gave you proof from the testimonies of eyewitnesses present inside the Square, and you've just dismissed it because you're content to view China in negative light that's all.
    1
  14073.  @yslee1401  Given that you're quite knowledgeable of such an old Taiwan series, are you perhaps a Chinese that somehow ended up in Australia? And it sounds like you're quite advanced in your age too.
    1
  14074.  @rafaelcordero8002  You asked more than one question, yet you said: "i have a question for you"? Ukraine is vital for grain shipment to Africa. Ukraine is being edged on by the US to go against Russia, even though there's no mutual defense treaty between them. And the Ukraine conflict is literally affecting the rest of the world even as we speak, but hardly anyone cares about the Philippines at this point in time. Also, the West Philippine Sea is not the international recognized name for that region. It is known internationally as the South China Sea.
    1
  14075.  @nosum223  Following international law? The Philippines had international grounded a vessel (Sierra Madre) onto the Second Thomas Shoal. China had offered to repair the vessel and get it back to the sea, but Philippines refused. Instead, Philippines is sending supply ships to reinforce the rusting hull of the grounded vessel. How's this in accordance with international law?
    1
  14076.  @8thsheet407  The authors of the following article have found that 70 countries expressed support for China's stance on the South China Sea, compared to 5-7 countries that support the Philippines stance. (Source: The Diplomat: Who Supports China in the South China Sea and Why)
    1
  14077. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14078. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  14079. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14080. Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14081. Even Taiwan's own constitution acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14082.  @ashpatel2505  "And what kind of world order China is building? Yes it includes Russia, North Korea!" Lol Russia and North Korea ARE a part of this world that we live in, are they not? Why should we exclude them from world affairs just because the West says so? Russia is the world's largest country by landmass, are you saying you want to pretend like they don't exist in this new world order? This is clearly your colonial mentality that's subconsciously directing your way of thinking to be aligned with that of the Anglo-Saxon. And didn't I mention earlier that just like China, India does not condemn Russia's special military operation in Ukraine? Yet you criticize China while praising India.
    1
  14083. +Total War Fan ???
    1
  14084. Source: Mainland China troops and police NOT PART of Hong Kong police operations: channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/hong-kong-protests-mainland-china-troops-11989352
    1
  14085. China has the world's largest ship building companies. In fact, the world's largest 24,000 TEU class container ship, COSCO Kawasaki 397, has embarked on a trial voyage.
    1
  14086. Also, when did I ever claimed that China doesn't fathom racism? And calling me by racial slur is considered giving me a dose of my own medicine? When did I ever hurl racial slurs at you now?
    1
  14087. Tibet and Xinjiang were part of China since 800 years ago, when Mongolians conquered them and incorporated them into Yuan Dynasty China.
    1
  14088.  @MarkYeung1  Same thing, the new Australian PM Anthony Albanese can talk to President Xi Jinping on resolving Sino-Australian issues. The former Australian PM Scott Morrison was somewhat anti-China.
    1
  14089.  @Andy-P  Those so-called 14 "demands" were grievances, NOT demands, they represent China's side of the deteriorating relations between Australia and China, and could act as a starting ground for further negotiations to improve our relationship. If both sides want to salvage a relationship, then of course we have to know what the other is thinking, and China merely laid bare the grievances that were undermining the relations.
    1
  14090. China has the world's longest range ICBM, the DF-41, with a range of 13,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the US LGM-30 Minuteman with its range of 13,000 km. How will the mountain range pose a problem to China, if Chinese misiles can literally fly over the Himalayas?
    1
  14091.  @william_marshal  Besides drones, take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html
    1
  14092.  @william_marshal  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours.
    1
  14093.  @william_marshal  Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions?
    1
  14094.  @william_marshal  Besides fast trains, China is home to one of Top 5 world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) Video: Sunway TaihuLight named world's fastest supercomputer youtu.be/KEdsrT1mFAU Source: China surpasses US in supercomputers usage on Top500 list cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion).
    1
  14095.  @william_marshal  About technology in China, China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  14096.  @william_marshal  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    1
  14097.  @william_marshal  Some people got nothing to contribute to debate, except for insulting other people for different views.
    1
  14098.  @william_marshal  Can't I bring up China's positive achievements? All you do is hurl insults against me for my views that's all, you don't contribute anything to debate, except insults.
    1
  14099.  @william_marshal  You're the one lacking an argument, all you done is waste other people's time, yet you tell me to stop wasting your time?
    1
  14100. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14101.  @MarkYeung1  According to Freedom House, Singapore’s parliamentary political system has been dominated by the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) and the family of current prime minister Lee Hsien Loong since 1959. The electoral and legal framework that the PAP has constructed allows for some political pluralism, but it constrains the growth of opposition parties and limits freedoms of expression, assembly, and association.
    1
  14102.  @MarkYeung1  For example, Halima Yacob, the current President of Singapore is unelected and no votes were cast to elect her into power. So how exactly is Singapore an example of why "democracy and freedoms" work for Chinese people? Also, China has 8 other parties other than the CPC and they are Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang, China Democratic League, China National Democratic Construction Association, China Association for Promoting Democracy, Chinese Peasants' and Workers' Democratic Party, China Zhi Gong Party, Jiusan Society, and Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League ... (Source: Wikipedia: List of political parties in China)
    1
  14103.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou The largest number of Hong Kong expatriates will always be in mainland China for obvious reasons." Yes, because those Hong Kong expatriates visited mainland China and found the mainland's progress much to their liking. You said: "Many of them settled in the United Kingdom, United States and Canada, not to mention Singapore and Taiwan." Those numbers hardly affect anything and it still doesn't change the fact that mainland China holds the largest number of Hong Kong expatriates, far more than United Kingdom, United States, Canada, Singapore and Taiwan island. You asked "Is there a reason why?" During the 2019 Hong Kong riots, there were many Hong Kongers who resort to violence, vandalism, breaking shop windows, hurling molotovs, shooting arrows, and other unlawful activities, and they fear reprisal from the law for their actions, which is one possible reason why they fled Hong Kong. However, mainland China remains host to the largest number of Hong Kong expatriates.
    1
  14104.  @MarkYeung1  Singapore is not a democracy. We all know that. It is a system where a small elite of the family of Lee Kuan Yew deceased run the show. Unless you submit and are chosen, you have no say in the system regardless if you are citizen or not. It has no right to free speech and expression. Any public criticism is roundly crushed and if serious enough punished through their selected legal system. There are no free newspapers, no free media and everyone is closely surveilled day and night. They can do this because it is a small island. ... Singapore Blogger Gopalan Nair.
    1
  14105.  @Zsharma1  America also blocked Huawei and Canadian government arrested Huawei CFO (and CEO's daughter) Meng Wanzhou, even though Meng did not break any Canadian laws while in Canada.
    1
  14106.  @wlkbeastmode-issiap.346  China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores. Yet most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    1
  14107.  @Zsharma1  Chinese government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and stop production, impose lockdown, close tourist attractions, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and contain the virus. 1,000-bed hospital and 1600-bed hospital were built in Wuhan, medics from all over country boarded planes to fly to Wuhan and medical supplies poured into Wuhan to help the doctors and nurses there. Now it's finally paying off and China is slowly restarting our economy. Video: Xi Jinping: 'People's safety and health always come first' youtu.be/G_hiIpEXpTg But look at Western countries like US and UK, their economies are too precious to sacrifice so human health has to be sacrificed instead. Trump wants to get the economy back on track ASAP and Boris Johnson is relying on herd immunity. The American healthcare workers look overwhelmed, tired, ill-equipped, facing shortage of masks, gloves, goggles, faceshields, PPE suits, ventilators. The worst thing is that state governments have to bid for the medical supplies and compete with one another.
    1
  14108.  @bartonlee3594  Everyone's talking about Biden and the GOP here, why'd you suddenly bring up Chinese "nationalists" loving Putin? And funny how you keep talking about "echo chambers" when you're basically agreeing with them on Biden and the GOP.
    1
  14109.  @wheresmyeyebrow1608  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, and the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact.
    1
  14110.  @wheresmyeyebrow1608  Take Chinese characters for example and Chinese characters constitute the oldest continuously used system of writing in the world, having been used since 1200 BCE and today, Mandarin Chinese is the most spoken language in the world by number of speakers. Whereas other ancient scripts like Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia) Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered dead languages today, because they are no longer evolving, and no new words being added to their vocabulary. Source: Chinese characters wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_characters
    1
  14111.  @Harthorn  China is a Western name given to our country named after Qin Dynasty. Of course China was not called China during Warring States period because Western English hasn't existed yet to call it China.
    1
  14112.  @Harthorn  Ancient Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has revolutionised modern warfare.
    1
  14113.  @Harthorn  China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been governed for 5000 years. Our leaders have access to a wealth of political experience in form of political literature, military textbooks and government manuals in how to govern the world's most populous country so what makes you claim China was never China? Don't Chinese still write using Chinese characters today, whereas Sumerian Cuneiform, Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs have since fallen out of use?
    1
  14114.  @Harthorn  What makes you claim Chinese inventions are no longer hold relevance today? People today are still using Chinese inventions up till today isn't it. With Chinese invention of paper, came inventions like paper lanterns, paper umbrellas and paper banknote (which made business transactions easier since merchants need not carry around lots of metal coinage and precious stones) Mankind's first aviation was in the form of paper kite, and even hot air balloons were invented in China, and were known as Sky Lanterns (天灯) or Kongming Lanterns (孔明灯) Here is beautiful video of RISE Lantern Festival in Las Vegas, celebrated with Chinese Sky Lanterns. Video: youtube.com/watch?v=SNtwlBbBdb4&t=10 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  14115.  @ZeldaZiplock  Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    1
  14116.  @ZeldaZiplock  During Sino-Vietnam War, the People's Liberation Army fought all the way to Hanoi and the Vietnamese were powerless to halt the Chinese advance on their capital. It was only through China deciding to withdraw from Vietnam that Vietnam could finally breath. On 6 March, China declared that the gate to Hanoi was open and that their punitive mission had been achieved. On the way back to the Chinese border, the PLA destroyed all local infrastructure and housing and looted all useful equipment and resources (including livestock), severely weakening the economy of Vietnam's northernmost provinces.
    1
  14117. It was a Chinese Fire Drill, so that's why she need to know "How many seats?" the vehicle had. (I'm joking of course)
    1
  14118. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14119. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14120. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution,
    1
  14121. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14122. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14123. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms while Chinese President Xi is entering his 3rd term.
    1
  14124.  @item6931  "神州 Shenzhou China's EVs don't go without Australian lithium. China misbehaves (high probability)? No China EVs lol" The lithium mined in Australia first needs to be refined and processed elsewhere. And when it comes to processing lithium, China is in a league of our own and China's share of the market for lithium-ion batteries is estimated to be as high as 80 percent. So if not for China, Australia's lithium would remain unprocessed.
    1
  14125. ​ @stunningandbrave2520  Although 3640 EVs have caught fire in China in the first quarter of the year, this is nothing compared to the tens of thousands of petrol cars in China that caught fire every single year.
    1
  14126.  @item6931  You said: "Without Australian lithium you have nothing to process." China can always obtain lithium from other sources such as Africa. China can also obtain lithium domestically from brine which can be found in salt lakes in Tibet, Xinjiang, Qinghai and Inner Mongolia. But Australia will have a hard time processing its lithium without China.
    1
  14127.  @jonathanhe7676  You said: "Here’s a hint: it isn’t Taiwan that’s threatening to militarily invade and risk a nuclear war." Is there a buildup of People's Liberation Army troops in the Taiwan Straits between Taiwan and the mainland (like what's happening with Russian troop buildup at it's border with Ukraine)? If not, then who's threatening a military invasion?
    1
  14128.  @stopwarstop7334  "Tell me about the weapons China have pointing on Taiwan." So let me ask you, is there a build-up of People's Liberation Army soldiers at the mainland/Taiwan border in the Taiwan Strait (like the build-up of Russian soldiers at its border with Ukraine)? If not, then do you have any evidence that mainland China is going to invade Taiwan island?
    1
  14129.  @chinadollfmd  Villain? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, doesn't it look as though the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here?
    1
  14130.  @ronaldgosiengfiao9663  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. All verified eyewitness accounts present in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 said that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: The Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We’re ‘Remembering’ are British Lies globalresearch.ca/tiananmen-square-massacre-is-a-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies/5386080 (By Gregory Clark) The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing’s iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time — among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    1
  14131.  Alex The Awesome  USA does not protect, look at 2014 when Russia had military intervention in Crimea and annexed it from Ukraine, and all Washington did was impose sanctions on Moscow that's all. No US-Russia war, and Crimea is now part of Russia. So what makes you think USA will go to war with China? Even Philippines has said that USA is unreliable ally because they did nothing when China reclaimed Scarborough Shoals.
    1
  14132. Historical Economic Predictions about China: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2021 Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  14133. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14134. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  14135. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14136.  @dialecticcoma  This is the first time I made this comment, where in the past 2 years have I posted the exact comment as this?
    1
  14137. Rare earths are key components used in high tech devices, such as smartphones, digital cameras, computer hard disks, LED lights, flat screen TVs, computer monitors, EV batteries, solar panels, wind turbines,_ and any other high tech device you can think of. And China is home to 80% of the world's rare earth production.
    1
  14138. Many Chinese tend hold optimistic views and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners (but not all) tend towards being pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    1
  14139. China has world's largest internet population (in fact, the 2nd most common language in the Internet is Chinese, after English) and everybody wants access to China's markets, be it automobile, smart phone, etc, so what makes you think the rest of the world will always look down on China?
    1
  14140. China focus on domestic issues, instead of intervening in other country's internal problems. The U.S intervenes in other country's internal problems, instead of focusing on their own domestic issues.
    1
  14141.  @Nein9nein9nein  According to China's 2018 White Paper on Protecting Freedom of Religious Belief, China has nearly 200 million believers and more than 380,000 clerical personnel. China's 5 major religions are Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism, and Protestantism. -There are 222,000 Buddhist clerical personnel and over 40,000 Taoist clerical personnel. -There are 20 million Muslims with about 57,000 clerical personnel. -Catholicism and Protestantism have 6 million and 38 million followers, with 8,000 and 57,000 clerical personnel respectively. At present, there are about 144,000 places of worship registered for religious activities in China: -33,500 Buddhist temples (including 28,000 Han Buddhist temples, 3,800 Tibetan Buddhist lamaseries, and 1,700 Theravada Buddhist temples) -9,000 Taoist temples. -35,000 Islamic mosques. -6,000 Catholic churches and 60,000 Protestant churches. There are approximately 5,500 religious groups in China, including seven national organizations which are Buddhist Association of China, Chinese Taoist Association, China Islamic Association, Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association, Bishops' Conference of Catholic Church in China, National Committee of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement of the Protestant Churches in China, and China Christian Council.
    1
  14142.  @Nein9nein9nein  According to China's 2018 White Paper on Protecting Freedom of Religious Belief, China has nearly 200 million believers and more than 380,000 clerical personnel. China's 5 major religions are Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism, and Protestantism. -There are 222,000 Buddhist clerical personnel and over 40,000 Taoist clerical personnel. -There are 20 million Muslims with about 57,000 clerical personnel. -Catholicism and Protestantism have 6 million and 38 million followers, with 8,000 and 57,000 clerical personnel respectively. At present, there are about 144,000 places of worship registered for religious activities in China: -33,500 Buddhist temples (including 28,000 Han Buddhist temples, 3,800 Tibetan Buddhist lamaseries, and 1,700 Theravada Buddhist temples) -9,000 Taoist temples. -35,000 Islamic mosques. -6,000 Catholic churches and 60,000 Protestant churches.
    1
  14143.  @Nein9nein9nein  According to China's 2018 White Paper on Protecting Freedom of Religious Belief, China has nearly 200 million believers and more than 380,000 clerical personnel. China's 5 major religions are Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism, and Protestantism. -There are 222,000 Buddhist clerical personnel and over 40,000 Taoist clerical personnel. -There are 20 million Muslims with about 57,000 clerical personnel. -Catholicism and Protestantism have 6 million and 38 million followers, with 8,000 and 57,000 clerical personnel respectively.
    1
  14144.  @Nein9nein9nein  According to China's 2018 White Paper on Protecting Freedom of Religious Belief, China has nearly 200 million believers and more than 380,000 clerical personnel. -There are 222,000 Buddhist clerical personnel and over 40,000 Taoist clerical personnel. -There are 20 million Muslims with about 57,000 clerical personnel. -Catholicism and Protestantism have 6 million and 38 million followers, with 8,000 and 57,000 clerical personnel respectively. At present, there are about 144,000 places of worship registered for religious activities in China: -33,500 Buddhist temples (including 28,000 Han Buddhist temples, 3,800 Tibetan Buddhist lamaseries, and 1,700 Theravada Buddhist temples) -9,000 Taoist temples. -35,000 Islamic mosques. -6,000 Catholic churches and 60,000 Protestant churches. There are approximately 5,500 religious groups in China, including seven national organizations which are Buddhist Association of China, Chinese Taoist Association, China Islamic Association, Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association, Bishops' Conference of Catholic Church in China, National Committee of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement of the Protestant Churches in China, and China Christian Council.
    1
  14145.  @Nein9nein9nein  What are you talking about? China has nearly 200 million believers and more than 380,000 clerical personnel. There are 222,000 Buddhist clerical personnel and over 40,000 Taoist clerical personnel. There are 20 million Muslims in China with about 57,000 clerical personnel. Catholicism and Protestantism have 6 million and 38 million followers, with 8,000 and 57,000 clerical personnel respectively.
    1
  14146.  @yslee1401  Vietnamese PM Pham van Dong had acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were Chinese territory in a diplomatic note he sent to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." ... (There's even a photograph of this diplomatic note in this source: Wikipedia: File: 1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai)
    1
  14147.  @ColoniaMurder20  You're Filipino right? Free the Philippines from the Americans!
    1
  14148. Anne-droid Most likely they were cast out. Like the documentary said, to apply for eunuch, you had to first castrate yourself to prove your loyalty, then take the imperial exam. If you failed, then you maybe rejected from entering imperial service. Here's an example from Wikipedia: "On 30 January 1406, the Yongle Emperor expressed horror when the Ryukyuans castrated some of their own children to become eunuchs in order to give them to the emperor. The Yongle Emperor said that the boys who were castrated were innocent and did not deserve castration, and he returned the boys to Ryukyu and instructed them not to send eunuchs again." So, as harsh as it seems, in ancient China, eunuchs can still be rejected from serving in the imperial court, despite being castrated already.
    1
  14149. Anne-droid I'm afraid I don't have the answers to all your questions, but it was almost guaranteed that rejected eunuchs would be treated harshly when they returned home. Failing the imperial exam is already considered dishonorable to their families. Eunuchs had power inside the Imperial city, but outside it, they were despised worst off than women (Gender inequality was rampant in most medieval societies) Sons were prized as heirs to the family line, daughters could still get married off to arranged political marriages and to secure wealth, but a eunuch couldn't produce any children and carry on the family line, and were probably reduced to slave labor. This was probably the unfortunate reality at that time.
    1
  14150.  @quekjoseph836  The late Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore's founder) was a dictator who tolerated no dissent and he jailed or expelled dissidents and political rivals (like Francis Seow萧添寿) so what makes you think Singapore isn't under one party ruling? Yet such a huge crowd turn up at Lee's funeral, because he was a benevolent dictator. Then what's wrong when China has benevolent dictator like President Xi Jinping, when it has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot)? I find that people from Singapore tend to treat Chinese from the mainland with disdain and look down on our political system when Singapore has been governed by authoritarian single-party PAP for 55 years just like China has been ruled by CPC for 71 years.
    1
  14151.  @yslee1401  Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-graft campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign, but after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    1
  14152.  @quekjoseph836  Who said you can talk bad about your president in Singapore? According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore ( hrw.org/asia/singapore ) Singapore’s political environment is stifling. Citizens face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. In 2019, parliament passed a sweeping “online falsehoods” law that permits a single government minister to order the “correction” or removal of online content. The rights of the LGBT community are severely curtailed. So doesn't Singapore's authoritarian political system under PAP, sound very similar to China's political system under the CPC? Are you sure you're from Singapore when Singaporeans can't protest at all? Yet you don't even know this? Apart from the PAP, Singapore's opposition parties sucks, they are deliberately kept weak and inept, so that Singaporeans continue to vote for the PAP during elections. For 55 years, Singaporeans have been voting for the PAP all this while, isn't that the same as China being under the rule of CPC for 71 years?
    1
  14153.  @yslee1401  Corruption in China is punished severely too. Over one hundred officials of provincial-ministerial level and above have been implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China, which began after the 18th Party Congress in 2012. Source: Officials implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China (2012–2017) wikipedia.org/wiki/Officials_implicated_by_the_anti-corruption_campaign_in_China_(2012%E2%80%932017)#:~:text=Over,2012 But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? Didn't Trump paid $750 in taxes to the US government, but paid $200,000 in taxes to China? (Thank you Trump!)
    1
  14154.  @quekjoseph836  Singapore has a list more than 100 banned websites, who said you can access any applications in the world? Are you really a Singaporean, when you don't even know about censorship in Singapore? In July 2006, mrbrown's weekly column in newspaper Today was terminated after he highlighted the immediate price hikes after the 2006 Singapore general elections. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said mrbrown's column had ‘‘hit out wildly at the government and in a very mocking and dismissive sort of tone’’ and Minister for Information, Communication and the Arts sent a letter saying his article could undermine national stability, and that it was "not the role of journalists or newspapers in Singapore to champion issues, or campaign for or against the government". That's a prime example of government censorship in Singapore, isn't Singapore's political system similar to China's in this regard? And who says you can't log into Facebook, YouTube and Google while in China? There are many expats in China posting videos of daily life in China, like Gweilo 60, Barrett, Daniel Dumbrill, Nathan Rich, Alex Absolute, JaYoe Nation, and so on. Source: Internet censorship in Singapore wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_Singapore And Singapore been ruled by authoritarian single-party PAP for 55 years just like China has been ruled by CPC for 71 years. What's the point of having an election when you Singaporeans always vote for the PAP? For 55 years? Lastly, even Singapore dissidents like Amos Yee, became a fugitive in Singapore after he criticise Singapore's founder, Lee Kuan Yew, Source: Singaporean teen dissident granted US asylum yahoo.com/news/singaporean-teen-dissident-granted-us-asylum-020859504.html
    1
  14155.  @quekjoseph836  China block Facebook, Google and YouTube in order to deny them access to China's Internet market (the world's largest) and to allow our local Chinese companies like Weibo, Baidu and Youku to survive foreign competition and thrive. That's why there are so many Chinese companies like Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, Youku, bilibili, Weibo, and so on. Whereas Singapore allow Facebook, Google and YouTube to dominate so much that Singapore don't have any strong Singaporean companies to compete with these US companies. In fact, Facebook, Google and YouTube literally have a monopoly in Singapore without any competition from Singaporean companies.
    1
  14156.  @yslee1401  Look at US corruption where Trump nominated candidate, Justice Amy Coney Barrett was sworn into the U.S Supreme Court in just weeks after her nomination. Looks like Trump will have another supporter on the Supreme Court when they finally get around to trying him for crimes. Yet you still want to talk about corruption in China, even when there's ongoing anti-graft campaigns in the communist party?
    1
  14157.  @yslee1401  "神州 Shenzhou And China does anti-corruption by making CCP officials more corrupt." You're clearly unable to refute my points, you reached the stage where you're just biased against China that's all and posting comments that make no sense.
    1
  14158.  @quekjoseph8156  About feeding our population, China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. Source: Fishing Industry in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishing_industry_in_China China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_producing_countries_of_agricultural_commodities Whereas Singapore can't even feed its small population and they need to import food from overseas and to import water from neighbouring countries like Malaysia.
    1
  14159.  @yslee1401  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. All verified eyewitness accounts present in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 sat that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    1
  14160.  @yslee1401  According to Jay Matthews, reporter for The Washington Post as far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 and all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. Source: The Myth of Tiananmen: And the price of a passive press (By Jay Mathews) archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php
    1
  14161.  @pranjalverma3501  Wet meat shops? What are those?
    1
  14162.  surojeet chatterjee  French eat snails and horsemeat, British eat rabbit stew and Australians eat kangaroo meat, so why mock Chinese eating habits?
    1
  14163.  Sky Lazar  A mysterious respiratory illness has hit Fairfax County in USA. This was reported in USA back in mid-2019. Video: Third death confirmed after respiratory outbreak at Fairfax County assisted living facility, 63 resi youtu.be/GM-gzm_sOM0
    1
  14164.  surojeet chatterjee  It's already been debunked by experts that coronavirus is Chinese lab made. Tulane virologist Robert Garry, PhD, and a team of researchers analyzed the genome sequence of the novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and found no evidence that the virus was made in a laboratory or otherwise engineered. Video: Virologist explains origins of COVID-19 youtu.be/YLykxJqTBpU
    1
  14165.  surojeet chatterjee  The Bat Soup coronavirus origins myth have long been debunked by experts. Source: No, Coronavirus Was Not Caused by 'Bat Soup'–But Here's What Researchers Think May Be to Blame health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/coronavirus-bat-soup
    1
  14166.  surojeet chatterjee  You're just anti-China that's all. Look at other virus outbreaks like Bird Flu, Swine Flu, H1N1, MERS (Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome) or other virus outbreak occur regardless of Chinese eating habits. Because virus mutation is a random act of nature and new strains are always emerging anytime, anywhere. But you just blame China even though science has proven that the virus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, Chinese scientists say analysis of genomic data from 93 samples of the novel coronavirus suggests it was imported from elsewhere. Source: Coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, Chinese scientists say scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3051981/coronavirus-did-not-originate-wuhan-seafood-market-chinese
    1
  14167. What the West needs in Ukraine right now is an off-ramp, yet all they have is an escalator.
    1
  14168. Agreed. At least under President Xi there are crackdowns on corruption within the communist party and more than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption in China. But when's the last time a country like USA had a crackdown on corruption?
    1
  14169. Agreed. Corruption afflicts every country to a certain degree, but at least under President Xi there are crackdowns on corruption within the communist party and more than 100,000 people have been implicated for corruption in China, including over 120 high-ranking officials, including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders. But when's the last time a country like USA had a crackdown on corruption?
    1
  14170. Agreed. Corruption affects every country to a certain degree, but at least under President Xi there are crackdowns on corruption within the communist party and more than 100,000 people have been implicated for corruption in China, including over 120 high-ranking officials, including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders. But when's the last time a country like USA had a crackdown on corruption?
    1
  14171. +a b said "in fact the Tienanmen Square protests had started as the funeral of Deng Xiaoping" Deng Xiaoping was still alive at the time of the 1989 Tiananmen Square Incident. In fact, Deng was in charge, and it was he who ordered the People's Liberation Army to quell the protestors. Some PLA troops had refused to open fire upon the unarmed protestors, other troops panicked and fired their guns into the crowds. Some PLA troops refused to fight back, but were mobbed by angry protestors who took their guns and used it against them. In the end, Deng Xiaoping went to his grave without ever admitting to the Tiananmen Incident. It just goes to show that every Chinese leaders made mistakes of some sort, whether it is Dr Sun Yatsen, or Chiang kai-shek or Mao Zedong or Deng Xiaoping, they all made mistakes, because they were clearly human. But it is clear that each Chinese leader had some individual vision of China that they wanted to achieve, and many would claim that they were patriotic. Otherwise, why each of them fight so hard for China's sake? But you people are foreigners to Chinese history, and just treat all Chinese leaders like demons or angels, instead of looking at history from a neutral and purely objective point of view. For example, those Tiananmen Square pro-democracy student protestors, they were still young, idealistic and still studying at that time, living in a enclosed world of education and textbook ideals, and have not yet stepped into the real world of working adults. They haven't yet entered the work force, or get a job, apply for housing and start a family, yet they believe they know how to govern the country at such young age already?
    1
  14172. +AgarTron China has long history of benevolent rulers being respected and tyrannical leaders eventually being overthrown. If the a bad leader is in charge, you think the ordinary citizens won't rise to overthrow the leaders? That's been happening since ancient times in China and elsewhere in the world. President Xi Jinping is at least willing to tackle the corruption problem evident in the communist party, which even previous Chinese presidents like Hu Jintao and Jiang Jiemin refused to tackle. If you don't start anti-corruption campaigns with someone, then how are you ever going to deal with corruption? I mean, look at USA and when is the last time USA had an anti-graft crackdown of its own? In my opinion, Hilary Clinton is corrupt politician, and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his presidential campaign. But after Trump became president, no further action been taken against Clinton! Once again, I am talking about Chinese civilization, not our governing system. I mean, China was even conquered by Mongolians and Manchurians, but still, Chinese civilization is Chinese civilization, and those foreign rulers of China eventually assimilated into Chinese culture. For example, Chinese Characters have been continuously in use since 1200 BCE, and today, Mandarin Chinese is the most spoken language in the world. But other ancient languages like Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia), Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs have since become 'dead' languages.
    1
  14173. +g The communists government is an atheist entity and why should bearing firearms be allowed at all? In America its easy to commit crimes like robbery due civilian access to guns. Sometimes the policemen shoot the African American suspect first and ask questions later, because of the possibility of the suspect being armed with firearm. And look at all those tragic school shooting in USA by armed gunmen. So much could be done about the situation of loose American gun laws, but nothing being done, because Americans refuse to surrender their rights to bear firearms. List of school shootings in the United States wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_school_shootings_in_the_United_States
    1
  14174. +Scott Tangent Would someone who can type out good English like me, still work for a miserable 50 cents per post? With my excellent command of the English language, why would I still choose a Chinese username, instead of posing as a Western account? That would make little sense to a 50 cent member isn't it?
    1
  14175. +BungyStudios I can't understand the context of your statement at all. Which comment of mine (i made so many comments here) are you replying to?
    1
  14176. Madara Uchiha I personally support President Xi's anti-corruption campaigns within the communist party. No government is completely free from corruption and there should be always be regular anti-graft crackdowns. But tell me when was the last time a country like USA had an anti-corruption crackdown of its own? For example, in my opinion, Hilary Clinton is probably corrupt politician, and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential Campaign. But after Trump became president, no further action had been taken against Clinton since.
    1
  14177.  @TesterBoy  Jiang Jieshi was ruthless in his rule over Taiwan, and he jailed and imprisoned his political opponents (whether real or perceived) in a period of Taiwan known as "White Terror". How am I misinformed then? Didn't Taiwan progress rapidly under KMT single-party rule? Why is it Taiwan's economy today is in a slump because of DPP? The DPP is green and inexperienced political party, unlike the battle-hardened, politically experienced KMT, so why the people of Taiwan voted such a government to rule them? Here's a video of Taiwan government members resorting to violence in parliament, and throwing water balloons and furniture at each other. Video: Massive fight breaks out in Taiwanese parliament youtube.com/watch?v=kXmPDLRt6hA
    1
  14178.  @z26837129  那如果你不喜欢那些台中国人呆在你国家，为什么还不把他们赶出台湾呢？
    1
  14179.  @rohitrai8814  What propaganda are you talking about? Taiwan was ruled by authoritarian single-party KMT for more than half its life, as I have shown, and under KMT rule, Taiwan rapidly industrialized and prospered. How is that not true? Can you actually refute my points
    1
  14180.  @ohneon1998  "What people worry is China's ambition to lock their neighbors with them." China has offered to extend the One Country, Two Systems Policy to include Taiwan as well, allowing Taiwan to keep their government and for the mainland to keep ours, while remaining as a single unified China. No other country today has ever tolerated having multiple political systems within its borders except China. It is as though North Korea and South Korea agree to unify as single country Korea, but both are allowed to keep their respective governments. As for KMT, while it was totalitarian, Taiwan experience great economic progress and development under its single-party rule and only after the DPP took over, that Taiwan's economy is in a slump today. The green and inexperienced DPP is not the battle-hardened politically experienced KMT of the past, so that's why Taiwan is suffering from poor leadership today. Why then, do you seem to think Taiwan is making progress?
    1
  14181.  @ohneon1998  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when Mongolians conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated them into Yuan Dynasty. The Manchu people did a similar thing centuries during the Qing Dynasty. Also, Republic of China (Taiwan) still claims all of the mainland (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, include territory that is currently under the control of present-day Mongolia, Burma/Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Source: Map of ROC Administrative and Claims wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg
    1
  14182.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou I don't buy that for a second, have her make a statement out of the CCPs grasp else little more than hostage plays." The IOC has held a second video call with Peng Shuai, where she reconfirmed that she is safe and well, given the difficult situation she's in. Video: IOC holds second call with Chinese tennis star Peng Shuai | The World youtu.be/mPRPW08RB7k The WTA also received an e-mail from Peng who "expressed her shock for WTA's unfair decision to suspend all tournaments in China."
    1
  14183.  @fhps7987  "神州 Shenzhou what happened in Tienanmen. Help me remember." China held our 70th anniversary on Tiananmen Square with a massive parade. Video:youtu.be/2n7ARpAMeFU
    1
  14184.  @jvgpix9459  Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    1
  14185.  @ACP099  "Did you see or hear that video? I didn't and I don't know anyone who can prove there was a conversation." So did you read Peng Shuai's original post on Weibo then? Then why do you presume that there were allegations of sexual assault?
    1
  14186.  @V01DIORE  Not just the 2nd IOC video call, but the WTA received an e-mail from Peng who "expressed her shock for WTA's unfair decision to suspend all tournaments in China." So clearly, there are open communications between WTA and Peng Shuai after all.
    1
  14187. @Ming Do you actually have evidence of rape? Then why are people jumping to conclusions when there's no basis for this case?
    1
  14188.  @charlesfavell3350  "神州 Shenzhou Hi Wumao 👋 The Genocidal CCP thanks you" What genocide are you talking about? Isn't China the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people?
    1
  14189.  @charlesfavell3350  You can't refute my points so you just label me 50¢ for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours? Why not attempt to refute my points instead of attacking me personally?
    1
  14190.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Here’s a video of what actually happened in Tienanmen, gun wounds?" Tiananmen Square Massacre is a myth propagated by the British. According to Gregory Clark, several eyewitness present inside Tiananmen Square say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    1
  14191.  @V01DIORE  神州 Shenzhou Having a large population doesn’t undo the genocide of the Uyghurs, Tibetans, What genocide of Uyghurs and Tibetans? The population of Uyghurs in China has tripled from 3,640,125 in 1953 to 11,774,538 in 2020. The population of Tibetans has tripled from 2,775,622 in 1953 to 7,060,731 in 2020, so where's your evidence of genocide? And you still believe those organ harvesting rumors? Why didn't Obama or Trump or even Biden ever bring up the so-called organ harvesting issue to President Xi?
    1
  14192.  @V01DIORE  About Christians in China, some experts believe that China is on track to become world's largest christian country possibly by 2025. Video: China Will Be the Biggest Christian Nation youtu.be/z7atox9HWFw
    1
  14193.  @V01DIORE  Here's the graph for the population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 ... Here's the graph for the population of Tibetans in China from 1953 to 2020 1953: 2,775,622 1964: 2,501,174 1982: 3,821,950 1990: 4,593,072 2000: 5,416,021 2010: 6,282,187 2020: 7,060,731 ... So what genocide are you talking about when the population of Uighurs and Tibetans have been shown to have increased over the years?
    1
  14194.  @V01DIORE  神州 Shenzhou Who reported that data, China? Nevertheless keeping them in concentration camps and harvesting their organs is pretty much proven absolute. Where's the real data if you don't believe data from China? And where's the proof of concentration camps and harvesting organs? You said there's proof of organ harvesting then why doesn't US President Biden, Russian President Putin, German Chancellor Merkel, Canadian PM Trudeu, French President Macron, Indian PM Modi, or any other world leader bring up the issue with President Xi Jinping?
    1
  14195.  @V01DIORE  According to Jay Mathews, reporter for the The Washington Post as far as can be determined from the available evidence, No One died that night in Tiananmen Square and all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully.
    1
  14196.  @V01DIORE  "creepy staged photos"? That's already evidence that Peng Shuai is attending small events what more proof needs to be verifiable?
    1
  14197. ​ @charlesfavell3350  Again, what genocide are you talking about? I've quoted figures for the tripling of Uighur and Tibetan populations in China, and some experts predict China would become the world's most Christian country by possibly 2025. Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  14198.  @V01DIORE  About China "persecuting Christians", did you know which company in which country is the world's largest printer of the Holy Bible? Answer: Nanjing Amity Printing Company in China! producing an average of 70 Bibles per minute. They recently celebrated their 200 millionth Bible printed so far, in which over 85 million have been supplied to churches in China, with the rest exported to 147 countries and regions.
    1
  14199.  @V01DIORE  You seem to like getting your misinformation about China from this China Uncensored Channel. But China Uncensored is anti-China in nature, I remember Chris Chappel claiming that that Nanjing War Memorial Museum sells "war-time rape-theme p0rn" (at the last statement of this video:youtu.be/xBW1lQw_WrI ) But everyone knows that such explicit material is banned in China.
    1
  14200.  @charlesfavell3350  "神州 Shenzhou You still didn't answer my Question is there anything that the Genocidal CCP does wrong?" Again, how do you prove that the Communist Party of China is genocidal, given that I have shown figures that Uighurs and Tibetan populations in China actually tripled in size? The premise of your question is already warped, there is no evidence of genocide, given that the population of ethnic minorities in China have increased.
    1
  14201.  @V01DIORE  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  14202.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou The EU demands verification more than hostage plays." And who is the EU to make demands out of China? China is not a member of EU, what jurisdiction does the EU have over China? It's like another organization ASEAN demanding the know the whereabouts of Julian Assange from UK.
    1
  14203.  @charlesfavell3350  "神州 Shenzhou Still going Round and Round by sidestepping my Question is there anything that the Genocidal CCP does Wrong ? " You yourself can't even prove the claims of genocide wrong, the populations of Uighurs and Tibetans have since tripled in China, then you can't even frame your question correctly, yet you still demand answers out of me?
    1
  14204.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou How many bibles printed is utterly irrelevant to the situation in question and your abundant separate responses are bugging YouTube’s notification system." Then what evidence have you to support your claims of genocide against Christian's?
    1
  14205.  @V01DIORE  Go an check what Wikileaks says about Tiananamen Square, it says there was no bloodshed
    1
  14206.  @V01DIORE  The so-called debt-trap diplomacy by China has already been debunked by experts such as the Lowy Institute report published by Chatham House that China’s “debt-trap diplomacy” is a myth. Take Sri Lanka’s Hambantota Port. It is portrayed as the case par excellence for China’s debt-trap diplomacy. The conventional account is that China lent money to Sri Lanka to build the port, knowing that Colombo would experience debt distress and Beijing could then seize it in exchange for debt relief, permitting its use by China’s navy. This narrative is simply incorrect. The project was proposed by former Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa, not Beijing, as part of his government’s corrupt and unsustainable development program.
    1
  14207.  @charlesfavell3350  "神州 Shenzhou OK just for a second let's drop the Genocidal part for a second Is there anything that the CCP does wrong ?" Now you're being more reasonable by dropping the label "Genocidal" (given that the populations of Uighurs and Tibetans in China have since tripled in size). If you asking what the Communist Party of China does wrong, it has to be propaganda. Chinese propaganda clearly sucks and needs improvement. Hardly anyone believes Chinese media, even when they drawn upon data and statistics. On the other hand, Western propaganda is very effective. Many audiences blindly believe Western anti-China propaganda, even when it's unsubstantiated by actual proof. Chinese propaganda should learn a thing or two from Western propaganda, because our media are unable to bridge the gap between the reality in China against what is portrayed in the West.
    1
  14208.  @charlesfavell3350  "Oh I almost forgot here's another 50 cents Wumao 🙃" Since that comment was not addressed to anyone in particular, I'm assuming you're calling the OP, @Inmortal Joe a Wumao?
    1
  14209.  @V01DIORE  神州 Shenzhou Ah yeah who is the EU to demand China not to take a tennis player hostage?! What right do they have?! No, what right does EU have to pry into the privacy of Peng Shuai, given that she has expressed her desire for personal privacy? It's like ASEAN or some other region organization demanding to see proof that Julian Assange or Edward Snowden is okay.
    1
  14210.  @V01DIORE  神州 Shenzhou Put before they happen to be the ones taken along with the rest, though likely more Uyghurs, Tibetans I've already shown that the population of Uighurs and Tibetans in China actually tripled in size, so again what genocide are you talking about? You have no proof of your claims.
    1
  14211.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Navy or not they hold the ports over them." Experts from Lowry Institute have debunked the debt-trap diplomacy, but because you're apparently biased against China, you just dismiss their points that's all.
    1
  14212.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou You mean western propaganda is so good western people go over their firewall to tell China how great and not ethnically atrocious their country is despite the facts?" No, because Western propaganda convinces their audiences in their demonisation of China until people like you are already judging China even when you haven't been there yourself. As for ethnic genocide, I've already shown that the population of Uighurs and Tibetans in China actually tripled in size, but you given nothing to support your claims of genocide.
    1
  14213.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Ah yeah what right do the EU have to pry into Peng Shuai's privacy as a hostage?!" I mean, is Peng Shuai an European citizen? Is China a member of the European Union? Then what hostage taking are you even talking about? If the EU was so concerned about Chinese citizens being taken hostage, why didn't the EU demand for Meng Wanzhou's release from unlawful detention by Canada? That's the true hostage taking.
    1
  14214.  @V01DIORE  "WHO definitively not bribed praising China....Funny enough those who follow money are in with the CCP including their officials who’s meant to be communist." Lets follow the money then. The United States is the largest contributor to the World Health Organization at $893 million, compared to China's $86 million contribution to WHO. So if anything, the WHO should be in America's pocket, given that USA contributes 10 times more money than China to the WHO, yet you're claiming that China somehow bribed the WHO?
    1
  14215.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Most western people don’t even think about China," Did you heard about how many times Trump mentioned China in his speeches? If most Western people don't even think about China, then why are you all complaining about what happens in China? Western countries have many problems to solve themselves, why not solve your own domestic problems instead of focusing on China? Unless your politicians are somehow trying to redirect attention from your own country's problems towards China.
    1
  14216.  @V01DIORE  So we have established that Peng Shuai is clearly not an European citizen, then who gives the EU the right to pry into Peng Shua's personal privacy? The irony is that you accused China of being a "totalitarian surveillance state" yet the EU and the WTA are behaving like the paparazzi in demanding that Peng Shuai appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see. The sheer irony of it all!
    1
  14217.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Stop trying there’s literal recorded evidence." "神州 Shenzhou I literally gave you footage at the time and location of the event." So we have footage of Peng Shuai attending small parties and opening ceremonies, then why won't you believe Peng Shuai is safe and merely keeping a low profile? We have footage and photos of her after all.
    1
  14218.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Neither the Uyghurs European but don’t mean we can’t call it out," And again, what genocide of Xinjiang are you talking about, when the population of Uighurs in China literally tripled in size? I showed people this short 3-min video of Ürümqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for the best experience)
    1
  14219.  @V01DIORE  " It’s is quite likely she is being held hostage as to why there is demanded verification. The so called call for privacy even left the dash in it seemingly quickly drawn out forgery." I keep asking you for evidence from that E-mail that Peng Shuai is held hostage, but you have nothing. Instead you ignore Peng Shuai's pleas for her personal privacy to be respected because you're not doing this out of concern for Peng Shuai, you're just using her as a pawn to malign China that's all.
    1
  14220.  @V01DIORE  About "taking organs" why do you still continue to believe those organ-harvesting rumors? Has any world leaders like US President Biden, Russian President Putin, German Chancellor Merkel, Canadian PM Trudeu, French President Macron, Indian PM Modi, ever bring up the issue of organ harvesting to Chinese President Xi? Then why continue to propagate rumors without proof?
    1
  14221.  @V01DIORE  China's ghost cities are slowly being filled up. For example, in 2011, London’s Daily Mail reported that Zhengzhou was China’s largest ghost city. But today, Zhengzhou has a has a population of 10,120,000 inhabitants, and had a GDP of 1,014 billion(RMB) in 2018.
    1
  14222.  @V01DIORE  It's no secret today that the U.S is in decline* and China is rising. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many Westerners (but not all) have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very notion of China, a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country surpassing the United States someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many Westerners to fathom.
    1
  14223.  @V01DIORE  "Compounded by the evergrande problem China is in quite some trouble." There's some good news coming out of Evergrande, they managed to avoid a default by paying a bond coupon before the weekend’s deadline. Video: China's Evergrande avoids default after paying overdue interest youtu.be/gLfKKAjiLAs
    1
  14224.  @V01DIORE  神州 Shenzhou You even admit there are ghost cities, What China is doing is actually building cities in advance of anticipation of demand, so that as the people living in the rural countryside of China migrate to the urban centers to find jobs, they would have prefabricated cities to live in. Here's a video of Zhengzhou youtu.be/jFdLkgDS-QE once the largest ghost city in China that has been filled up since.
    1
  14225.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou While I'm not quite communist I despise capitalism, nevertheless China is an abomination." About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    1
  14226.  @V01DIORE  "What people are finding about China is how corruptly infected it is by atrocity. It is the notion of such with concentration camps for forced labour...." But where do these news about "concentration camps for forced labour" surface from? Take the allegations of forced cotton harvesting in Xinjiang for example, the Uighur workers literally drive cotton harvesting tractors harvesting truckloads of cotton from the cotton fields in Xinjiang. Yet Western allegations of forced labor in Xinjiang still persist? Video: Xinjiang, China’s top cotton producer youtu.be/ocVn5Cn101M
    1
  14227.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou In the video you can literally see the infrastructure rot, a waste. You’d have to demolish, rebuild and refurbish such costly" Infrastructure rot is something that occurs due to time. Just look at the rotting infrastructure in the United States for example. And you don't have to demolish to rebuild, it's a matter of proper maintenance that's all.
    1
  14228.  @V01DIORE  Communism may be impossible to fully realize, but that doesn't mean we can't approach to be as close to it as possible. Take the unequal global Covid-19 vaccine for example, and because of capitalism, rich developed countries are buying up and hoarding Covid-19 for themselves, leaving little to none for the poorer developing countries. Pharmaceutical companies are driven by profit to make vaccines for the rich, because that's what happens in our currently capitalistic society. Communism is the belief that scarce resources should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" (German: Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen) Had we been living under a truly communistic world instead, then the vaccines would distributed according to countries that urgently need it the most (i.e poorer developing countries) As World Health Organization Director Tedros (the guy you alleged is bribed by China) once said: "It is better to vaccinate some people in all countries, than to vaccine all people in some countries." I believe this reflects the essence of allocating resources according to needs.
    1
  14229.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Much too much, rot. You can’t get rid of what’s innate." This nihilistic way of thinking is the reason why many Westerners tend to have pessimistic and have a gloomy outlook of the future. Because apparently your Western institutions of democracy are failing, since it's not delivering what ordinary people want. Whereas in China, just ask around and many Chinese tend to hold optimistic attitudes and look forwards to a bright future a head.
    1
  14230.  @V01DIORE  I would argue that China's infrastructure construction is arguably among the best in the world. Take bridges for example, and China is home to many of the world's tallest, highest and longest bridges. Source: Wikipedia: List of Longest Bridges, List of Highest Bridges, List of Tallest Bridges Video: World's longest sea bridge! Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge to boost logistics youtu.be/3gLzWXxQkKs
    1
  14231.  @V01DIORE  Why do you keep referring to China Uncensored time and time again, when all they produce is negative news about China? Why don't you come to China and see what life is like here for yourself, instead of believing what Western media's negative portrayal of our country? Here's video of vlogger Raz Galor visiting Xinjiang cotton farmers Video: What I saw in Xinjiang working as a Cotton Farmer youtu.be/67pU0Ybovnc Seems like the cotton farmers in Xinjiang are quite modern and technologically advanced, making use of automated self-driving tractors and pesticide spraying drones to aid in their cotton fields. Yet why do Western allegations of supposed forced labor in Xinjiang cotton still persist?
    1
  14232.  @V01DIORE  "You mean buying up and hoarding like China did with masks before telling anyone it was infectious?" Well, your countries put those masks up for sale then can't Chinese fork out our hard-earned money to buy those masks and ship them back to China? Because China urgently needed those masks at that time so look at the amount of lives saved thanks to those masks that arrived in China. And if your own countries government failed to spot the growing spread in China (Wuhan lockdown, building temporary hospitals, etc) then it's your own country's lack of foresight, why blame China for your country's actions? China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 7th Jan 2020, China had isolated the coronavirus strain out of millions in record time, and by 11th Jan 2020, China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. The distinguished medical journal The Lancet had worked with China and published 5 articles warning the West to take necessary precautions against this new coronavirus strain, but many Westerners just ignored it. Now they seek to blame China for their own government's failure to handle the Covid-19 situation in their lands.
    1
  14233.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou The truth of nihilism(s) are irrelevant, of truth in general it is cold and deathly, I will not fool myself otherwise as I did before." Then why don't you come to China and see the truth for yourself, of what lies beyond the Western anti-China portrayal of our country? Here's a short 2-min video of 11 Chinese Cities in China. Video: Beautiful Night View of China 2016 11 cities in 2 minutes youtu.be/WyH7Af4Dt7E It's clear that you have found yourself fooled before, then why not come to China and see whether what Western MSM says about China is true or not?
    1
  14234.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou It has about the place. They are sound. I do not trust the CCP," Many people in China actually support the Communist Party of China. According to a survey by Harvard University and Ash Center, the majority of people polled, some 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the CPC. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    1
  14235.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou They covered it up for ages, and tried to cover it up for even longer, don’t talk such rubbish." So you believe the conspiracy that somehow "China Covered Up The Coronavirus!" then why would China suddenly reveal about a mysterious pneumonia-like illness to the World Health Organization on 31st December 2019? Why would China supposedly cover it up only to reveal it later? Your theory makes no sense, it's just an attempt on your part to blame China for your countries failure to handle the Covid-19 situation in your countries. "If you are going to talk of hoarding then don’t be a hypocrite." How am I a hypocrite by pointing out that your countries put masks up for sale to Chinese buyers? Chinese fork out our hard earned money to buy those masks and ship them to China to help control the outbreak in Wuhan, and we succeeded, just think of how much worst this could be if there masks weren't available to stem the spread in Wuhan. This sound like another attempt on your part to blame China for buying what your countries put up for sale. "Though it is true many governments underestimated it, but the time was fraught." And how much more fraught time would be for China to identify, isolate and sequence the Covid-19 genome? Yet you're accusing China of a cover-up?
    1
  14236.  @V01DIORE  Recently, the U.S CDC tested American blood samples dating back to 13th December 2019, and they detected the presence of Covid-19 antibodies. This implies that Covid-19 was in U.S earlier than previously thought, since it takes at least 2 weeks for a infected person to develop antibodies. Researchers came to this conclusion after the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention analyzed blood donations collected by the American Red Cross from residents in nine states. They found evidence of coronavirus antibodies in 106 out of 7,389 blood donations. The CDC analyzed the blood collected between Dec. 13 and Jan. 17. So if we look at 2 weeks before the earliest date on 13th Dec 2019, that means that Covid-19 was in the USA since at least late Nov 2019. This begs the question: why didn't the USA sound the alarm about Covid19? The U.S has arguably the best doctors, the best medical facilities, the best medical expertise, so they are well-equipped to detect a new coronavirus strain. Yet it was up to China with our inferior medical facilities to detect this new coronavirus strain?
    1
  14237.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou I have already told you why, I don’t plan on being made the honourably hostage in their hostage diplomacy" This is how powerful Western propaganda is, to portray China so negatively, to demonize our country so much, that people like you already harbor an extremely negative view of China, without even bothering to set foot in China to see what life is like here for yourself. And nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    1
  14238.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou They are coerced into saying so, it is a totalitarian government." Again, where's your evidence that they are coerced into saying so? You still failed to show evidence from that E-mail that Peng Shuai is held hostage like I asked earlier. It's as though any evidence that contradicts what you claim is automatically dismissed, then the problem clearly lies with you.
    1
  14239.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Because they could no longer cover it up as it got too large spread." Covid-19 was spreading in the USA earlier (as shown from U.S CDC testing American blood samples for antibodies) yet the USA didn't report this mysterious pneumonia-like illness to WHO, then how can you claim it got too large to cover up in China? Again, there is no basis to your conspiracy theory of "China Covered It Up" when China clearly first reported the virus to the WHO. "You are being a hypocrite for seeing it right to get Chinese people on CCP order to buy masks before the WHO stating it infectious vs western countries to buy necessary materials for future application because of said Chinese caused virus." Chinese did not start buying masks until the WHO stated human-to-human transmission was confirmed, then how is China to blame when your countries put those masks up for sale? Simply Don't sell masks if you don't want Chinese to buy them, why blame is China to blame for buying masks that we need to contain the Wuhan outbreak? As for buying necessary materials for future application, this is should have been thought out by your own governments, how's China to blame for your Western countries failure to plan ahead? And who said Chinese caused this virus? It was first detected in China but it doesn't necessarily mean China caused it. According to U.S CDC, it was circulating in U.S soil since at least Nov 2019, yet why didn't USA report the emergence of a new coronavirus strain? Instead it was left up to China to detect it?
    1
  14240.  @V01DIORE  Here's Tulane virologist Robert Garry, PhD, and a team of researchers analyzed the genome sequence of the novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and found no evidence that the virus was made in a laboratory or otherwise engineered. Virologist explains origins of COVID-19 youtu.be/YLykxJqTBpU
    1
  14241.  @V01DIORE  You yourself said earlier that "神州 Shenzhou Most western people don’t even think about China," Then where does all this vehement anti-China rhetoric suddenly sprung up from? How can Westerners go from supposedly not even thinking about China, to becoming convinced about how bad China supposedly is, especially without even setting foot in China and seeing what life is like here for themselves? This clearly isn't organic, clearly there's some force that's propelling ordinary people in the West to become anti-China, towards a country that many of them never been, and it's the Western anti-China propaganda that's driving up paranoia about China. As long as you are unwilling to visit China to see what life is like here for yourself, then you'll continue to be fooled by the Western MSM about China.
    1
  14242.  @HiredGoonage  It's ironic that you link an article about mass surveillance in China, yet the WTA is prying into Peng Shuai's private affairs instead of respecting her wishes for personal privacy. Can't you see the sheer irony of it all?
    1
  14243.  @charlesfavell3350  So now that I mentioned that Chinese propaganda clearly sucks, why don't you mention something positive that the Communist Party of China does? It's only fair that you say something good about the CPC after I said something bad about it, right?
    1
  14244.  @greabo9544  Have you ever talked to any Chinese person about the social credit system in China at all?
    1
  14245.  @kd5055  "神州 Shenzhou Oh so her previous Relationship with an older man has been revealed 🤔 so its okay for her to be kidnapped, her post regarding her complaint against a senior CCP thug is all irrelevant."_ Who says that she's kidnapped? Peng Shuai is resting at home and she wrote an email to WTA saying that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    1
  14246.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Likely because China covered it up such as I said was before December, remember the doctor who has been silenced?" You're referring to Doctor Li Wenliang? He was spreading rumours about the coronavirus being SARS (which is clearly untrue) he wrote that "There are 7 confirmed cases of SARS at Huanan Seafood Market." (华南水果海鲜市场确诊了7例SARS) so the authorities stepped in to curb the spread of unproven rumours that's all. But that was in 30th Dec 2019, and China had reported the emergence of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019, so again, how does that qualify as a cover up?
    1
  14247.  @V01DIORE  Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested? So many foreign companies come to China and set up shop here and many of them require access to Western websites like Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, so the government issue VPN license to these companies.
    1
  14248.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou The rating are kinda silly in any realistic nation," Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. Chinese people's lives are improving everyday, why is it inconceivable to you that the Harvard University and Ash Centre survey revealed that majority of Chinese people support the Communist Party?
    1
  14249.  @HiredGoonage  So we know that Covid-19 was circulating in the USA since possibly Nov 2019, yet it was left up to China to sound the alarm of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019? Then why do still insist that China covered it up when it was regarded as the flu in the USA? If not for China, the US would have never known about the existence of Covid-19 in their lands.
    1
  14250.  @V01DIORE  As for China "hoarding", once the Covid-19 situation was under control in Wuhan, China did not hoard masks, our factories have since started churning out masks to send to other countries. This factory in the eastern Chinese city of Rizhao (日照) has been busy pumping out 3,000,000 masks a day. Video: Inside China's Biggest Mask Factory youtu.be/Gc074FxOBA4?
    1
  14251.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwan sent multiple emails to the WHO in late 2019" Taiwan sent their email to World Health Organization on 31st Dec 2019, that's the same date that the mainland reported the mysterious pneumonia-like illness to the WHO, so what's your point?
    1
  14252.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou They still don’t, most family I know hold no such stance. I am telling them otherwise though." But you yourself admitted that you never actually been to China, then how can you tell people about a country that you never actually visited? And since you never actually visited China, why do you harbor such a vehement anti-China stance, without even setting foot in our country? Where does the source of this anti-China sentiment stem from? Ans: China Uncensored. It's obviously "poisoning your views" towards China.
    1
  14253.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Answer the question please, are you:" You are employing the fallacy of false dichotomy, limiting a response to only one of two options, where other options may exist.
    1
  14254.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou The doctor was taken and claimed to have covid, then said to have died from it," This doesn't change the fact that Dr Li had his post on 30th Dec 2019, and China had reported the emergence of a mysterious pneumonia-like illness to WHO on 31st Dec 2019, so how does it indicate that China supposedly covered up the virus?
    1
  14255. ​ @V01DIORE  "You may have gotten industrialism but what was lost was something else greater. " What exactly did China lost? China has transformed from a previously dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into an economic juggernaut, the world's factory, a growing scientific and innovation power protected by world's largest land army. Then why is it inconceivable to you that majority of people support the Communist Party of China, as revealed in the Harvard University and Ash Center study?
    1
  14256.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou So they didn’t buy masks to hoard in the beginning that such countries required for when it spread?" China had a shortage of masks and the beginning of the Wuhan Outbreak, that's why overseas Chinese bought masks (that your countries put up for sale in the first place) to ship them back to China. It's thanks to the masks that China was able to limit the spread of coronovirus and China has since recovered and is now churning out masks to send to other countries. Regarding faulty equipment, you have to admit that when the pandemic became more widespread, the demand for masks and PPE was so great that even Chinese factories struggled to produce enough PPE to meet the demands of the world. As a result, quality control suffered as China needed to urgently meet the enormous demand, but China has since stepped up with stricter QC measures regarding outgoing PPE.
    1
  14257.  @HiredGoonage  "神州 Shenzhou The Covid 19 Virus came right out of the Covid Wuhan Bat Virus facility and the whole world knows it." I've already debunked this previously with the Tulane Virologist video. Even the World Health Organization team visited Wuhan Institute of Virology and they all but dismissed the possibility of a lab leak as highly unlikely. More likely it's the Western world's inability to deal with the Covid-19 situation adequately so they are trying to deflect blame away from their governance onto China.
    1
  14258. @Ming "神州 Shenzhou rabbit cpc scammer" Which part of my argument is a scam? Why don't you attempt to refute my points instead of hurling personal insults against me for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    1
  14259.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwan was the first to acknowledge human to human transmission as both the WHO and CCP official is denied," I read the Taiwan email dated to 31st Dec 2019. The contents are as follows: News resources today indicate that at least seven atypical pneumonia cases were reported in Wuhan, CHINA. Their health authorities replied to the media that the cases were believed not SARS; however the samples are still under examination, and cases have been isolated for treatment.I would greatly appreciate it if you have relevant information to share with us. Thank you very much in advance for you attention to this matter. Best Regards But where in Taiwan's email was there acknowledgement of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus?
    1
  14260.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou I admitted it so and I went over why already. I can read the news, data, recordings and history." But you've never actually been to China (as you admitted) and seen what life is really like here for yourself, then yet you already harbor an anti-China stance without ever being to this place? "China uncensored had enlightened me to the uncensored insidious dealings of China." Why do you trust a channel like China Uncensored that's vehemently anti-China in nature? You've been poisoned by that channel to hate a country that you've never actually set foot into, and now you want to spread this malice to other Westerners?
    1
  14261.  @HiredGoonage  "Lol at the WHO investigation everybody knows they were hampered by China." How? The WHO Team paid a visit to the Wuhan Institute of Virology's national biosafety P4 laboratory and the overall professionalism of the institute impressed them. During the visit, they looked at research work, security measures of the laboratory, and discussed international scientific cooperation and anti-epidemic efforts.
    1
  14262.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Freedom, integrity, not being disappeared" Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  14263.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou So you are claiming A?" Again, this is part of your fallacy of false dichotomy, you make a presumption that if something is not B, then it's A. It's a fallacy used by disingenuous people to restrict others into selecting only one of two options, when there might be more options available.
    1
  14264.  @V01DIORE  神州 Shenzhou Everywhere had a shortage of damn masks after China brought and shipped them off covertly only to sell faulty equipment back. I've already explained this point several time. You said bought that is true. Overseas Chinese forked out their hard earned money to buy masks that your countries put up for sale, and they ship them back to China to help fight the outbreak in Wuhan. It was a success, the Wuhan situation has stabilized. Who knows how many more people would have been infected if not for those masks that China urgently needed in Wuhan. As for faulty equipment, Chinese mask factories were suddenly swamped by the enormous demand for masks globally, that's why Chinese factories began ramping up mask production. This factory produces 5,000,000 masks a day in a bid to supply shortfall. Video: China: Factory produces 5 million masks a day in bid to supply shortfall youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw Unfortunately, due to the urgent demand, the quality control in some factories suffered as a result, but the Chinese government has since responded by stepping up better QC measures to guard against faulty equipment.
    1
  14265.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou To prove you are not a wumao tell me an insulting thing about Xi’s appearance." Well, personally I think it would be better for our leader's personal health if he watches his weight better. Now that I've said that, could you say something positive about the Communist Party of China? It's only fair that you return the gesture.
    1
  14266.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Their actions to monitor status of people coming into the country and quarantine any fitting the criteria is such acknowledgement." Virtually every other mainland China neighbor was doing that, monitoring status of people coming into their territory, how is that acknowledgement of human-to-human transmission? And it's not a confirmation though, the confirmation of human-to-human transmission of Covid-19 was made by mainland China on 20th Jan 2020. Video: China confirms human-to-human transmission of new coronavirus youtu.be/XPbdMRXQhdE (dated to 20 Jan 2020)
    1
  14267.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou I can trust the data and recordings that coincide with the reality of the situation." How can you trust China Uncensored when all they put out about China is negative in nature? Since you never actually set foot in China and seen what life is really like here for yourself, you have been poisoned by China Uncensored into harboring a vehemently anti-China narrative without even having been here and confirming it for yourself. Earlier you spoke that "I will not fool myself otherwise as I did before." so it means that you have been fooled before, yet why are you willingly continuing to play the fool for China Uncensored then, instead of finding out what China is really like by visiting our country?
    1
  14268.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Free to travel but also links to espionage using familial links in the mainland to blackmail information. Yeah… the tourists don’t have the best reputation." So you regard Chinese tourists, Chinese students, etc, in your country as having links to espionage? That we are Chinese spies? Who is responsible for spreading fear and paranoia about Chinese to you, if not China Uncensored? It's literally poisoning you to hate anyone of the Chinese race that's all, how is this good for you mindset? Did your earlier words of "I will not fool myself otherwise as I did before." mean nothing, given that you only learn about China through China Uncensored, instead of actually setting foot in our country?
    1
  14269.  @HiredGoonage  Why are you spreading anti-China sentiment through labelling of China? Look at all those racially-motivated attacks against Asian Americans because American politicians like Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo choose to refer to the virus by it's improper name. Video: Asian Americans face discrimination in wake of the coronavirus youtu.be/t_IyTxRNUYk
    1
  14270. @Ming "神州 Shenzhou I would never argue with a troll.. they never see the light , just spew random cpc messages to. taint anything they west says" Because Western anti-China MSM is deliberately painting a negative image of China and "demonising" our country, then can't I offer a different point of view? Have you actually been to China and seen the massive improvements to people's lives under the leadership of the Communist Party of China? Then how can you claim to have seen the light?
    1
  14271.  @V01DIORE  "But can say China's history is rich and I like some manhua...." Since I've honored your request and made a remark about President Xi's appearance, then why don't you honor my request to say something positive about the Communist Party of China? It's only fair that you return the favour after all, why can't you say something positive about the CPC? As for China's rich history, China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  14272.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou And the western countries forked over their hard owned money for what they brought of which you found fault in doing, so making you hypocritical" Some of those money were from overseas Chinese after they bought masks that your countries put up for sale, and I have already explained that faulty equipment were due to the massive global demand for masks, so some quality control suffered as a result. Some Chinese companies choose to open mask factories during this period and take advantage of the demand to produce fake equipment. But the Chinese government has since stepped QC measures to deal with the issue. Also, how am I hypocritical when I have explained how China isn't hoarding PPE, instead we are sending it to countries that need them?
    1
  14273.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou 20th of jan was wayyy too late." Because it takes time to confirm human-to-human transmission, you expect China to magically know everything there is to be know about Covid-19 immediately? It was called the novel coronavirus at one stage, because it was still relatively new to science. I find it ironic that you complain about China's handling of Covid-19, when it had been circulating undetected in the US (as shown in US CDC blood samples) but you excuse the US actions.
    1
  14274.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou I never asked you to say anything positive about the west's leadership" Yes, but I'm the one asking you to name something positive that the Communist Party of China has done, after I have honored your earlier request, so why can't you honor mine? You want to talk prove neither of us are government agents, well I've already proven mine by honoring your request, so why don't you honor mine to say something positive about the CPC, to prove that you're not a government agent? It's only fair.
    1
  14275.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou You already made the contradictory statements and I will not go over it again." What contradictory statements? You said China "hoarded" but I have clearly shown that China send masks to other countries once the situation in Wuhan stabilized, so how am I being hypocritical?
    1
  14276.  @HiredGoonage  "神州 Shenzhou nothing against Chinese people it's your s**t evil government that's the problem" Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  14277.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou It doesn’t really take time to do so when it’s spreading like wild fire," Spreading like wild fire doesn't necessarily confirm that it's human-to-human transmission, it could have been traveling through contact surfaces, or through contaminated food, or some other forms of transmission. And China didn't even have Covid-19 testing kits at the time of Wuhan Outbreak, it is unrealistic to expect so much out of China, given that the novel coronavirus was new to science at that time. "They even held a feast gathering yet knowing of the problem." Where's the evidence that they know of the problem before holding a feast gathering? January 2020 was around the period of the Spring Festival, so people were celebrating the festivals, but you just claim everyone in China suddenly know everything there is to know about Covid-19 almost instantaneously? That's unrealistic isn't it? And again what cover-up are you talking about? You expect China to magically know everything about the coronavirus, but obviously time is needed to ascertain the attributes of the virus. Just like this new Omicron variant, at this point in time, the transmissiblity of it is not well understood, and scientists need at least 2 more weeks to gather information. And 20th Jan 2020 is just 3 weeks after 31st Dec 2019, so why do you claim it doesn't really take time to do study it?
    1
  14278.  @HiredGoonage  "神州 Shenzhou Dirty China goes out and buys everything in poor nations when they are down and out." China needs raw materials to fuel our growth, so while our companies buy resources from developing countries, our businessese also offer to build infrastructure to help developing countries develop themselves. Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China youtu.be/TtduKDpy4oc China has done much to help develop African countries in just decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  14279.  @HiredGoonage  "Dirty China is getting ready to invade Taiwan while old man Biden is asleep at the wheel" Where's the evidence that mainland China is going to "invade" Taiwan? Is there a massive buildup of People's Liberation Army forces near the straits of Taiwan? President Xi Jinping is committed to peaceful reunification of Taiwan with the mainland. And if you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution, so how can China possibly invade our own country?
    1
  14280.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Makes no difference what you say now, it is certain you are just an agent of the Chinese government," What's your proof? You gave me weird numbers like 365718 & 353355, how am I supposed to know the meaning of those seemingly random numbers?
    1
  14281.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Before that you really feign ignorance?" I really don't know what's the meaning of random numbers like 365718 & 353355 yet you claim they are nuclear launch codes? Could you prove it to me that they are?
    1
  14282.  @V01DIORE  Earlier, why'd you said: "though if you are expecting me to compliment the communist party you might as well be asking me to compliment hitler." ? I could say he helped the industrialization of Germany after WWI and now the term German Engineering is well-known for it's quality. But why is it that you admit that you're unable to compliment the Communist Party of China?
    1
  14283.  @HiredGoonage  "神州 Shenzhou they've been bullying Taiwan for years and Taiwan wants nothing to do with them. Always flying in their airspace, always having the Navy crossing the line." Since when did mainland planes flew into Taiwan airspace? Mainland planes flew within international airspace and were actually closer to the mainland than they were to Taiwan island, yet you're claiming the mainland flew into Taiwan airspace? As for having the Navy crossing the law, the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) sailed within mainland and international waters, what are you talking about?
    1
  14284.  @HiredGoonage  " Always flying in their airspace" From what I understand, national airspace covers a state's territory and territorial waters which extend 12 nautical miles from the coast. But mainland planes never came within 100 miles of Taiwan, so how can you claim that the mainland flew planes in Taiwan's airspace? Video:youtu.be/gyLsU2JSa-E
    1
  14285.  @polynesianwarrior2166  Well said. Logically thought out and well-argued. This is the piece of information that's sadly missing in the West today.
    1
  14286. @Ming "神州 Shenzhou no point if it's under The Vanished ... likewise the million Uighur that Vanished ..." So you're just saying that 1 million Uighurs just vanished off the face of the Earth like that? Where do you even get the figure of 1 million Uighurs from? Out of nowhere?
    1
  14287. @Ming "神州 Shenzhou 1 million, conservative , by using data from different source , from the police officers that got reports stolen," Conservative? So you're saying more than 1 million Uighurs vanished? Using data from different sources, but it turns out that this figure of 1 million came from just 2 sources, one of which only interviewed 8 Uighurs on what their estimated number of Uighurs in re-education schools were, and then they extrapolated the figure to arrive at the figure of 1 million Uighurs in detention. A report by the Grayzone goes into detail how the figure of 1 million came about: While CHRD states that it interviewed dozens of ethnic Uyghurs in the course of its study, their enormous estimate was ultimately based on interviews with exactly eight Uyghur individuals.
    1
  14288. @Cliff Chang "神州 Shenzhou I don't know it's purely ignorant or you're simply selling your soul and promoting propaganda for CCP." How am I ignorant when I quote factual evidence to support my arguments, whereas other people just attack me personally (like you) for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours? "Peng Shuai is safe and freedom is guaranteed? So why her weibo is taken down and why is she not participating in any of the international tournaments?" Peng Shuai's 彭帅 Weibo account is still up (I just checked). If you read her original post (or the translation from Reddit) it's apparent that she's had a difficult time emotionally, with a tumultuous, on-and-off affair with a much older man, and now she just wants to lay low for a while until this all blows over, Participating in international tournaments is important yes, but her mental state of mind is far more important than any tournament. Many athletes have taken time off from tournaments, when they've become embroiled in a scandal, and Peng Shuai's previous affair with a much older man is by traditional Chinese standards, still a rather shameful affair which is possibly why she want's her privacy to be respected. "Video shot in China can't prove anything, if I hold you at gun point I can make you say anything I want you to say." Do you see any gun being pointed at Peng Shuai in those video? Especially when she attended the youth awards ceremony? Then why are you making up claims that aren't there? "People has their right to receive all kind of information and use their own judgement to determine it's true or false." People like Peng Shuai also have their rights to personal privacy, yet why is WTA and EU trying to pry into her personal life and demand that she bare her private affairs for all the world to see, instead of respecting her wishes? "Government works for its people, not people work for their government." Chinese government has done a lot for our people, but the same can't be said of many Western democracies. Harvard University and Ash Center recently conducted a survey that revealed around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    1
  14289.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Also I did compliment The Communist Party of China." You didn't, otherwise why'd you say: "though if you are expecting me to compliment the communist party you might as well be asking me to compliment hitler." This shows that you didn't compliment the Communist Party of China.
    1
  14290. @Ming "神州 Shenzhou not 8 man.. do you know how many now live in Turkey , Taiwan, Singapore, UK, America ?" Ajit Singh from Grayzone has found that the claims of 1 Million Uighurs in detention stemed from 2 sources. One is Adrian Zenz (an anti-China far right activist) and also CHRD interviewing just 8 Uighurs on what they think the number of people detained are, and they extrapolated the figure to arrive at 1 million. Video: Grayzone author Ajit Singh on misinformation about Xinjiang youtu.be/1_JBEb6OMiw
    1
  14291. @Ming "then why don't they give access to ANYONE , to explore the areas ? " Who says that people aren't allowed to visit Xinijang Uighur Autonomous Region? Here's a video of Singaporean visiting Ürümqi , Xinjiang's capital in China. Video: Singaporean in XinJiang Series Part 1 - Urumqi seeing is believing China youtu.be/QTWQIqFddfg
    1
  14292.  @V01DIORE  Redeem myself? I've already honored your earlier request, but you haven't honored mine to say something positive about the Communist Party of China. Yet you claim to have complimented the CPC but you didn't, I've not heard you said anything positive about the Communist Party of China thus far. As for those cryptic numbers, ask any ordinary person and nobody knows what those numbers mean. You said that it's nuclear launch codes but could you prove that they are?
    1
  14293.  @V01DIORE  " hypocritical as far as I see (about China being totalitarian, about hoarding" When have I ever been hypocritical about China's so-called "totalitarian" system? The ironic thing is that many Westerners accuse China of being a surveillance state, yet here the WTA and EU are demanding that Peng Shuai appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see, instead of respecting her wishes for personal privacy. As for "hoarding", I've already explained that although overseas Chinese bought masks (that your countries put up for sale) and ship them to China, China has since recovered and is shipping masks to other countries, so what "hoarding" are you even talking about? Hoarding what, you tell me?
    1
  14294. @Cliff Chang You translated Peng Shuai's words wrongly, she said 你发生关系 which means have a relationship, not have sex "Also Peng Shuai's Weibo is accessible only when you have direct link for it." So her account wasn't taken down, why do you claim it was?
    1
  14295. @Cliff Chang "Peng Shuai never personally said anything about wanting to have privacy." On 21 November 2021, the IOC said Peng had spoken to Thomas Bach, Emma Terho and Li Lingwei in a video call and said she "is safe and well, living at her home in Beijing, but would like to have her privacy respected at this time"; "You say there's a survey showing high support rate? Try to do that survey in North Korea and you will get a 100% support rate." Maybe it's because in your hypothetical example, the people in North Korea support their government? The North Korean government has shown to do a good job handling Covid-19 after all, that's probably why they garner support. But again, this doesn't detract from the fact that the Harvard University and Ash Center survey revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China.
    1
  14296. @Ming Here's a video of modern day Lhasa, Tibet, China (filmed by WildFilmsIndia) and you can see how developed Lhasa has become under communist party rule. Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, and modern technology like cars, telephone cables, computers, smartphones, WiFi, the Internet, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo (By WildFilmsIndia) Even the poorest Tibetan farmer can afford a smartphone, connect to the Internet and shop online in Taobao and have his purchases shipped all the way to Tibet in the Himalayas. Because Tibet is part of China after all.
    1
  14297. @Cliff Chang I read Peng Shuai's post again, the line is 既然你根本不打算负责,为何还要回来找我,带我去你 家逼我和你发生关系? (Since you are not going to be responsible at all, why come back to me and take me to your house and force me to have a relationship with you?)
    1
  14298. @Cliff Chang Peng Shuai's account on Weibo is clearly still up, who are you to claim that it's taken down when it's not? And you told me to search Peng Shuai on any Chinese search engine and I did so on Baidu and it returned around 10 million relevant results yet you claim she's "wiped off" the Internet? Go and search her name on Baidu. "Also, the IOC video call is controversial and cannot verify anything. First of all, there's only a photo claiming a video call was hosted, neither the video record nor a transcript was released." Because Peng Shuai has expressed her desire for privacy, that's why the IOC did not release the video record or transcript to in order to preserve her privacy.
    1
  14299. @Cliff Chang You said: "Secondly, a video call cannot verify she is not being controlled, someone could be around her to force her to follow the script." Do you have evidence that she is being controlled? Do you have evidence that someone is around her forcing her to follow the script? Otherwise it's just your speculation that's all. "Thirdly, Peng Shuai is a tennis player and IOC is not a tennis association. If anyone is to verify Peng Shuai's status it should be WTA, not IOC. IOC is doing this just as a show for winter olympic." What has Peng Shuai being a tennis player and even got to do with this? Peng Shuai is also a Chinese citizen then what has the WTA even got to do with her status? I could also say that WTA is politicising sports in order to sabotage the 2022 Beijing Olympics and get more countries to boycott it, isn't this a possible motivation for the WTA? "How do you believe a survey like this to be fair?" Because Chinese people's lives are improving. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. As long as the communist party can continue to deliver economic growth, many people in China continue to support it. Why is this inconceivable to you?
    1
  14300. @Ming I shown people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA
    1
  14301. @Ming Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    1
  14302. @Ming Here's a video of Canadian tourist visit to Lhasa and he took the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) and explains how each carriage comes equipped with its own emergency oxygen tank. Video: Welcome to Lhasa - Exploring the City (By Vafa Anderson) youtu.be/J-TfN56ETVM He remarks how much Lhasa has changed in 10 years since he last visited. Throughout the video you can see many religious people worshipping, praying, spinning those "prayer wheels" and performing full-body kowtows on the ground, so what makes you think the hearts and minds of Tibetan folk aren't with the central government?
    1
  14303.  @Cursed_Mark  "So, by your own logic, you are unable to judge anywhere that you haven't traveled to." No, in that statement you quoted, all I said was "But you've never actually been to China (as you admitted) and seen what life is really like here for yourself" where did I say you are unable to judge anywhere you haven't been to? "Again by your own logic, that lack of trust should also be consigned to any source that's vehemently pro-China. Like yourself." Again, in that statement you quoted, I'm just asking him "Why do you trust a channel like China Uncensored that's vehemently anti-China" that's all, and he never really answered, so what "lack of trust" are you talking about?
    1
  14304.  @Cursed_Mark  "Yes, copy-and-pasted hyperbolic rhetoric which parrots the party line does seem to work on certain people." You mentioned the party line, (which I presume is you are referring to the Communist Party of China). But from what I heard, the Communist Party of China hasn't said a word regarding Peng Shuai's case, so what is the party's line when nothing has been spoken about Peng Shuai? "And that same post has been repeated verbatim throughout this channel, so now all you have to do is copy-and-paste your sycophantic response to it." Why can't I agree with his point? It appears Logically thought out and well-argued after all. There is indeed a rabid sinophobic sentiment growing in the West, and anyone can see that US-China relations are deteriorating, so he offers an explanation why it is so. I mean, don't you notice the sheer number of rabid sinophobic posts here on this comment thread?
    1
  14305. @Ming Here's Where's Poppy's visit to Lhasa. She visited Jokhang Temple, one of the most sacred temples in all of Tibet, bustling with earnest local pilgrims since the early days. She also watched monks debate at Sera Monastery and tried some delicious local Tibetan food Video: First Day in Lhasa, Tibet youtu.be/3WetplXVVUo So what makes you think the hearts and minds of the people in Tibet aren't with the central government?
    1
  14306. @Ming "神州 Shenzhou tibetans are denies access to pension, health care and only can have education if it's in mandarin.." Tibetans in China enjoy special privileges over Han, for example, tax exemptions, free education up to 15 years, government bursaries, and exemption from the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want! The population of Tibet in China actually tripled in size from 1 million in 1951 to 3 million in 2019.
    1
  14307. @Ming Video: Visiting a Tibetan Middle School 探访西藏当地的一所中学 youtu.be/pSWaFsLgEpU The students in that school speak Mandarin as well as Tibetan language.
    1
  14308. @Ming Video: Tibet Singer sings in Tibetan language at Qinghai University - loving you by 更桑卓玛 youtu.be/2X5LLCVgBzI So many videos of Tibetans using their language in Tibet, yet you're saying educated Tibetans can't have an education?
    1
  14309.  @V01DIORE  "Also the compliment was literally in the comment a sentence after what you quoted." Where's the compliment on the Communist Party of China like I asked? Something positive about the CPC, that's what I requested, yet I don't see any compliment about the CPC in the sentence after. I have honored your request, yet it appears that you've refused to honor mine, yet you're accusing me of being a government agent? I mean, what's the point of you sending those numbers? They don't contribute anything to the discussion at all, just detract that's all.
    1
  14310.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou "China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court" backwards old age totalitarian admitted before" Yes I did previously mention China has always been under authoritarian rule, but how am I being hypocritical like you accused me of? And you claim it's a "backwards" and "old age" but apparently it's a successful system given that it's survived even till today in China. "Already went over hoarding just admit it already." No you didn't. Previously, overseas Chinese bought masks (that your countries put up for sale) and shipped them to China where it is urgently needed. Now that China has the Covid-19 situation under control, China is clearly not hoarding masks, we are shipping them to various countries around the world. Some were faulty equipment because of the surge in global demand for masks as Chinese factories struggled to keep up, quality control slackened, but has since been restored. So how am I being hypocritical about hoarding? You can't even point out the hypocrisy at all "神州 Shenzhou "free education up to 15 years" is a privilege?" Yes, that's something that the ethnic minorities enjoy that the Han do not. Han only have a 9-year compulsory education funded by the government that's all.
    1
  14311.  @frielleainsworth71  神州 Shenzhou Not just in public, bring her to America too... For what? Her home, her career, her friends are all in China.
    1
  14312. @Ming "神州 Shenzhou Yes American democracy has lots of problems, but I am not sure this propaganda onslaught is going to work and to be honest the propaganda organs are starting to sound a bit North Korean." You're right that American democracy appears to be failing and collapsing on itself, and that clearly Chinese propaganda sucks and needs improvement. I did mention this earlier how many audiences hardly believe Chinese media, even thought CGTN often quote data and statistics. On the other hand, Western propaganda is very effective. Many audiences blindly believe what Western MSM says about China, even when it's unsubstantiated by proof.
    1
  14313. @Ming Also, here's a Tibetan Singer Ah Lan (阿兰) singing a Tibetan song (Tibetan Plateau) in both Tibetan language and Mandarin Chinese. Video: alan 阿蘭(阿兰) - 青藏高原 Tibetan Plateau 藏/中文版 Tibetan and Chinese version (2020環球綜藝秀) youtu.be/jJfCI3FL9WI I mean, earlier you said you have talked to 60 Tibetan friends, but have they actually returned to Tibet to see how Tibet is prospering under the leadership of the Communist Party of China? Have they visited Tibetan schools and colleges and talked to the students there?
    1
  14314.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Oh I see YouTube didn’t notify me eh? The compliment to be exact after the quotation was" I read that quote and the Communist Party of China wasn't even mentioned at all, so clearly, you failed to honor my request that you say something positive about the CPC, whereas I have honored your earlier request.
    1
  14315.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou You previously denied that China was totalitarian, backwards of any civilised society in a dystopian manner" Where did I previously denied that China was all those things you said? Could you please quote me my words where I denied China was those things you said? As for old age, China's political system is ancient I agree, but certainly not backwards, since Chinese political system has done very well for China in the modern world too. For example, China's government has done well in controlling the Covid19 situation in our country, while it is spreading rampantly in Europe and the United States. "I never said that it wasn’t successful but merely abominably abhorrent." Abominably abhorrent? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like it's the United States that's being abominably abhorrent, all in the name of supposed "democracy". Did you see the U.S dronestrike killing an Afghan family of 10 (including children) and the U.S General in charge of ordering the strike faced no several consequences for his mistake?
    1
  14316.  @V01DIORE  "Not going over masks again you literally contradicted yourself but refused to admit it" Again, how did I contradict myself about China's "hoarding"? Here's videos of China doing the opposite. Video: Chinese donate half a million masks to Italy to aid coronavirus fight youtu.be/tQQa7RUKXzs Video: Half a million masks sent from China arrive in Spain youtu.be/nWcTx9ip_Qk Video: Chinese community in Rio de Janeiro donates 150,000 masks to local hospital youtu.be/arsnDRk0kqM
    1
  14317.  @V01DIORE   @V01DIORE  You said: "Makes sense that education is a privilege to people so indoctrinated." About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA in all three subjects: reading, science and mathematics. PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment
    1
  14318. ​ @V01DIORE  "but as for being backwards you denied that in the previous comment saying “you claim it’s “backwards” and “old age but apparently”… wouldn’t need the “but” if you agreed with it." "Backwards" and "Old Age" have different meanings and associations. China is old age in the sense that we are a 5,000 year old ancient civilization. But China is certainly not backwards, we are advancing in fields of science and development. For example, China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE
    1
  14319.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou I’m not going ages back for the totalitarian thing quote because it was more than inferred by the denial of obvious ethical atrocities of which there is both data and recordings to," So you have no quote of mine where I claimed China was totalitarian? Then clearly you can't accuse me of being hypocritical when I clearly never denied China was authoritarian. And what obvious ethical atrocities are you referring to? I've previously shown data that the populations of Uighurs and Tibetans in China actually tripled in size from 1953 to 2020 just look back to those graphs I presented previously:
    1
  14320.  @V01DIORE  Here's the graph for the population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 ... Here's the graph for the population of Tibetans in China from 1953 to 2020 1953: 2,775,622 1964: 2,501,174 1982: 3,821,950 1990: 4,593,072 2000: 5,416,021 2010: 6,282,187 2020: 7,060,731 ... So what genocide are you talking about when the population of Uighurs and Tibetans have been shown to have increased over the years?
    1
  14321.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Already told you about the masks." Yeah, that you're unable to show how I'm hypocritical about China's "hoarding" here's more mask videos: Video: China sends face masks, medical supplies to South Korea youtu.be/sTFaRqppOtg Video: Chinese donate 70,000 masks to Japan to aid COVID-19 fight youtu.be/cYkYHauUmwo Video: China donates 200,000 surgical masks to the Philippines youtu.be/jyXgmPX8VXU ... This is literally the opposite of China "hoarding" so how am I being hypocritical?
    1
  14322.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou That doesn’t make you any less indoctrinated or avoid that you said it was a privilege," Why do you claim I am indoctrinated because I'm educated? And it's a privilege for ethnic minorities to have 15 years of free education as compared to 9 years of free education for Han, so how is it not a privilege? When applying for university course, if a Han candidate needs say 600 points to qualify, then an ethnic minority needs only say 300 points (easier to qualify) for the exact same university course. Do ethnic minorities in the United States get educational privileges? Many African Americans for example, get marginalized at school and denied educational opportunities (for various reasons) are their government policies to help the ethnic minorities in the US for example as compared to China?
    1
  14323.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou The technology is cool but you know that’s not what I meant by backwards and old age. It’s like having a monarchal feudal system in place for a country with flying cars, yes the flying cars would be cool but the monarchal feudal system isn’t." Well, even though other countries like Britain and Japan have become Western-style democracies, they still keep the monarchy as a remnant, like the British Royal Family and the Japanese Emperor for ceremonial purposes. I personally think that it's cool that Chinese civilization can survive for 5,000 years of history (where other ancient civilizations eventually succumbed to history) and make it to the modern era, without adopting a Western brand of democracy. It goes to show that not all countries have to adopt Western style democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  14324.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou “China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court" Yes, that's why I said, but again how am I being hypocritical? You said: "神州 Shenzhou You previously denied that China was totalitarian, backwards of any civilised society in a dystopian manner" but thus far, you failed to quote me my words that I deny China is those things you said. However, I would like to point out that China certainly isn't "backwards" because I've shown examples of science and technology developing in China. Besides fast trains, mainland China is home to one of Top 5 world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) Video: Sunway TaihuLight named world's fastest supercomputer youtu.be/KEdsrT1mFAU
    1
  14325.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Copy pasting previous stuff I see, we already went over that and why that doesn’t prove anything." You can quote supposed date and videos, then why can't I go over previous stuff I said that you refused to acknowledge? I've shown that the population of Uighurs and Tibetans in China tripled in size from 1953 to 2020, so what genocide are you talking about then?
    1
  14326.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Already went over masks stop bringing it up." So I presume that you're unable to prove any alleged hypocrisy of China when it comes to "hoarding" since I've demonstrated several videos where China is donating masks to other countries. China even donated ventilators to New York, who urgently needed it at that time. Video: Chinese donate 1,000 ventilators to U.S., says New York governor youtu.be/x_D5Ggj69Rw
    1
  14327.  @V01DIORE  Speaking of Flying Cars, have you seen the world's first passenger drone that's invented by Chinese company? Video: World’s First Passenger Drone Unveiled In China | NBC News youtu.be/B7Hm-rmLQcU I mean, China is a demonstration that countries can innovate and advance scientifically and technologically whatever the political system. China is living proof that not all countries have to adopt Western brand of democracy to succeed, and personally, I find it cool that a 5,000-year old civilization like China has survived the vigorous tests of history and survive into the modern era relatively intact, whereas other ancient civilizations like Egypt, Rome and Mesopotamia have since crumbled to history.
    1
  14328.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Finally something new and interesting. But CCP still needs to fix the system." There are many new and interesting technologies happening in China. Especially regarding drone technology, here's video of an amazing holographic drone show in China Video: the most amazing drone holographic light show in China - 超震撼无人机编队表演集合 youtu.be/BjRb6u_PQwQ Since China's political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then why should CPC fix a system that's clearly not broken, you tell me? In fact if we want to talk about failing systems, it's the Western democratic institutions that are slowly crumbling and falling apart.
    1
  14329.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou I already did I needn’t go over it again and again." So I presume you're unable to point out the hypocrisy of China's "hoarding" given that I've shown many videos of China donating masks to other countries? That means you concede on the point of "hoarding" hypocrisy since you can't prove it.
    1
  14330.  @V01DIORE  You said: "I like the history too… but what the CCP has turned China into is something that shouldn’t be," How is China something that shouldn't be, under the Communist Party of China? China's 5,000 years of history has been under authoritarian central government rule, under the leadership of Emperors and the Imperial Court. China's current political system closely emulates the political systems of ancient China, so if anything, the CPC is keeping in Chinese tradition of having a strong central government in charge. In contrast, China never had a Western-style democratic system throughout thousands of years of history, so the Western brand of democracy is clearly foreign to China as a form of government.
    1
  14331.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou I did acknowledge it look when you last used it. I also talked about how it does not refute the genocide China does." How can there be a genocide when clearly, the population numbers of Tibetans and Uighurs are increasing even as we speak?
    1
  14332.  @frielleainsworth71  "神州 Shenzhou so the west media would shut up about it already...I don't know if you're stupid enough to understand what I mean..." You really think the Western Media would shut up about China just because Peng Shuai is brought to the U.S? Remember the U.S Olympic Gymnast team scandal involving the coach Larry Nassar and his sexual abuse of young girls, of which complaints submitted to FBI have been ignored for decades? Why should China send Peng Shuai to the USA given their reputation of ignoring sexual abuse of their own U.S gymnasts?
    1
  14333.  @V01DIORE  You said: "It feels like the current China is husk of what it was (culturally), it feels… artificial, fake, just a facade for the party." Could you explain how is China a husk of what we were culturally? China has many historical buildings like The Great Wall of China, The Forbidden City, The Terracotta Army, Qin Emperor (1st Emperor of China) Tomb, The Grand Canal (world's oldest and longest artificial river) and many more historical sites. Here's some videos of China's historical sites in 4K, since apparently you like history. Video: The Great Wall of China in 4k youtu.be/EotbKqZmBuY Video: Forbidden City, Beijing, China in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/R9vcSWb6mug Video: Terracotta Army, Xian, China in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/VhIouznYlvo Yet you're claiming China is a husk of what we were culturally?
    1
  14334.  @V01DIORE  "The amount of urns don’t fit the death statistics," I've heard about many people using the large numbers of urns as evidence that death statistics aren't true, but the amount of urns doesn't prove that death statistics are fabricated and I shall explain why. During the Jan 2020 lockdown in Wuhan, many delivery services were halted, and this includes funereally services like delivery of urns as the whole city entered lockdown. This results in a build-up of urns waiting to be delivered to family members, and that's why there were huge urn deliveries in order to clear this backlog of urns accumulated as a result of disruptions caused by the lockdown. Therefore, the huge numbers of urns doesn't prove that there were statistically more deaths due to Covid-19, given this simple explanation.
    1
  14335.  @V01DIORE  About ghost cities, I went over that already that they are slowly being filled up. For example, in 2011, London’s Daily Mail reported that Zhengzhou was China’s largest ghost city. But today, Zhengzhou has a has a population of 10,120,000 inhabitants, and had a GDP of 1,014 billion(RMB) in 2018. Here's a video of Zhengzhou youtu.be/jFdLkgDS-QE a city that was once China's largest ghost city in 2011 according to Western news.
    1
  14336.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Proved it ages ago" Which Age? The Stone Age? Bronze Age? Why is it you claim China is a husk of what we were culturally? The Forbidden City in Beijing is ranked the world's most visited palace surpassing even Western palaces by sheer volume of visitors. List of most visited palaces and monuments 1. Forbidden City (Beijing, China): 17,000,000+ visitors per year 2. St. Peter's Basilica (Vatican City): 11,000,000 visitors per year 3. Palace of Versailles (Versailles, France): 8,100,000 visitors per year 4. Lincoln Memorial (Washington DC, USA): 7,804,683 visitors per year 5. Colosseum-Forum-Palatine Hill Circuit (Rome, Italy): 7,650,519 visitors per year ... Source: Wikipedia: List of most visited palaces and monuments
    1
  14337.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou UK had the Magna Carta and got rid of the power of the monarchy for a reason." China is not the United Kingdom, and since China's political system clearly works for our country, then is there really a need to abandon our political system and adopt Western style democracy? China is living proof that not all countries have to adopt Western brand of democracy. The problem arises when you try and impose a Western brand democracy onto another country. Look at India, the world's 2nd most populous country after China and despite India being the world's largest democracy, why hasn't India surpassed China in various fields?
    1
  14338.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Not with stifled population growth they ain’t, nor the construction crisis." It's not so much the slowing population growth that's a factor, it's more of the migration of millions of people from the rural countryside into the urban centers that's a driving force for filling up China's cities. As for Chinese construction, China is home to more skyscrapers than any other in the world. Countries by number of skyscrapers in 2020 1. China (2055 skyscrapers) 2. United States (800 skyscrapers) 3. Japan (251 skyscrapers) 4. United Arab Emirates (251 skyscrapers) 5. South Korea (220 skyscrapers) 6. Australia (109 skyscrapers) 7. Canada (108 skyscrapers) 8. Thailand (104 skyscrapers) 9. Indonesia (102 skyscrapers) 10. Malaysia (91 skyscrapers) ... Video: Countries with Most Skyscrapers (1960-2020) youtu.be/g8BRy-dyY6Y
    1
  14339.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Probably about the genocide and masks" Again, what genocide and what mask hoarding? I've already shown that the Uighur population in China actually tripled in size from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. And I've shown several videos of China donating masks to other countries, so what "hypocrisy" of China's hoarding is there to even talk about? Here's some more videos, this time of China donating vaccines to other countries: Video: China-donated vaccines arrive in Malaysia youtu.be/x_X5dHWI1ck Video: China-donated COVID-19 vaccines arrive in Philippines youtu.be/7BlV-5dFNxU Video: China donates 500,000 vaccine doses to Somalia youtu.be/Ird1IIyaqow
    1
  14340.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou “works” yeah I mean nazi germany “worked”" "works" is present tense, but "worked" is past tense, so China's political system clearly "works" for our country (even till today) where's Nazi Germany "worked" (according to you). Then what's the point of your statement? China was previously a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made-in-China) having world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  14341.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou The amount of skyscrapers built with tofu dreg I wonder." Seems like all you like to do is throw mud on China's achievements it appears. China's infrastructure construction is arguably the best in the world. For example, China is home to many of the world's longest bridges, tallest bridges and highest bridges: Video: World's longest sea bridge! Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge to boost logistics youtu.be/3gLzWXxQkKs Video: China has built the world's highest bridge youtu.be/lIVo-ZaBkjg Video: The Tallest Bridge In The World Cost $147 Million youtu.be/CdT0ZJJv6ws
    1
  14342. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14343. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14344. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  14345. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms and would have done a 5th if she didn't voluntarily withdrew her candidacy in the last German election. Whereas Chinese President Xi is only entering his 3rd term.
    1
  14346. Chinese President Xi is only entering his 3rd term, whereas German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms and would have done a 5th if she didn't voluntarily withdrew her candidacy in the last German election.
    1
  14347. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14348. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14349.  @dihu7958  China's life expectancy did increased under Chairman Mao Zedong, why can't I redeem Chairman Mao? He's is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, he succeeded in reunifying our divided country where the previous Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) failed to achieve for 37 years. When Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" ROC 🇹🇼 China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Chairman Mao, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  14350. Chinese: "Welcome to China!" Americans: "Go back to China! (or whatever country you came from!)"
    1
  14351.  @ChillDfect  So far, all you've given is just your own personal anecdote. There are so many expats that come to China and remarked on how Chinese welcomed them to China. Whereas if a Chinese goes to America, he or she may be met with unwelcoming glares from the locals, including some who would tell us to "Go back to China!"
    1
  14352. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑 。
    1
  14353. But this Tahir leave his wife and kids behind? And your daughter calls you bad, because you never came back, and instead run away to USA isn't it?
    1
  14354. +Dumbledores Army As far as I know, the Chinese Agent who spoke to Tahir was a Uighur as well so how was he being racist against his own kind here? And when did the agent told the daughter that her mother would be jailed because he studied abroad? You people are just making up imaginary statements without any proof of your own.
    1
  14355. +Dumbledores Army "I mean Han Chinese are allowed to study everywhere abroad but him not." Excuse me, but Tahir himself studied abroad in Israel isn't it? So why are you just jumping to conclusions and blaming CCP for his choice to abandon his family? That Uighur agent choose to join the CCP on his own accord (its very difficult to qualify to become a member of the Chinese Communist Party, and many applicants often get rejected) so how is he being forced into this line of work? You mean Americans don't keep track of other Americans whom are suspected of being involved in terrorist activities? Or Britain, Canada, France, etc, for that matter?
    1
  14356. America is doing to Tik Tok what they did to Huawei; banning them because they are successful Chinese companies.
    1
  14357. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14358. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14359. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  14360. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14361. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, if you read its constitution.
    1
  14362. Red Scare (fear of communism) and Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) is fueling Sinophobic sentiments in the West towards Chinese.
    1
  14363.  @MarkYeung1  In that televised address, Putin publicly stated that Russia has no plans to occupy Ukraine. ... Source: Bloomberg: Transcript: Vladimir Putin’s Televised Address on Ukraine
    1
  14364.  @MarkYeung1  In that televised address, Putin publicly stated that Russia has no plans to occupy Ukraine. ... Source: Transcript: Vladimir Putin’s Televised Address on Ukraine
    1
  14365.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou So, Putin was lying when he said that." Do you have evidence Putin was lying when he said Russia has no plans to occupy Ukraine? Additionally, when the Russian forces vacated the Mayor of Bucha tweeted that "All is well" and made no mention of anything bad happening. Yet after the Ukrainians took over, suddenly they are scapegoating Russia?
    1
  14366.  @MarkYeung1  Chernobyl region is not occupied by the Russian Army, what are you talking about?
    1
  14367.  @MarkYeung1  CGTN reported that, but I'm asking you where did Putin lied when he said Russia has no plans to occupy occupy Ukraine? So far, all those places you described have all been vacated by Russian forces.
    1
  14368.  @jesusisjerryallahistom  But are those NBA games watched by Chinese getting paid for? If anything it's probably the VPN providers in China who profit the most in this fiasco.
    1
  14369.  shin chan  But who shot first? Who started the US-China trade war? Before Donald Trump, there was no trade war until he came to power.
    1
  14370.  @jesusisjerryallahistom  NBA is in a lose-lose situation. Either they lose their principles or lose money. And if American influence is so successful like you said, then why can't American rescue NBA from this crisis? Has President Donald Trump come out to say anything about NBA banned in China?
    1
  14371.  @jesusisjerryallahistom  It's more like USA is unable to influence China to ease the NBA ban, whereas China can influence NBA to watch their tweets from now on.
    1
  14372.  @jesusisjerryallahistom  I also heard that Blizzard Activision also banned an e-sports player (Chung Ng Wai) for a year and confiscated his prize money, after he shouted "Free Hong Kong, the revolution of our times!" on public broadcast of his game tournament.
    1
  14373. Do you perhaps happen to know if George Yeo thinks in English or in Chinese inside his head? Why then do you boast that Yeo "understands Chinese history on a strategic level way deeper than most ordinary Chinese intellectuals."? No offense to the man himself, but I'm sure even ordinary Chinese students have a firmer grasp of Chinese history than him.
    1
  14374.  @amg5656  The Soviet Union fought against the Nazis during WWII. Russians suffered the most casualties of WWII (even higher than China's death toll under the Japanese), but the Soviets also inflicted the most damage unto the Germans during WWII. If not for the Soviet Union, all the people of Europe would be speaking German (apart from the Germans themselves of course)
    1
  14375. Russia, China and the rest of BRICS are developing a currency pegged to the dollar. While the US Dollars is pegged to nothing, and the US can print dollars with impunity.
    1
  14376.  @BURGATRON  What "West Philippines Sea" are you even talking about? I don't see it's name anyway on the recognised world map. As for Donglong, it was India that agreed to pull out of Donglong and even till today, the People's Liberation Army troops continue to patrol that region. Source: PLA troops patrolling Doklam to exercise sovereignty: China economictimes.com/news/defence/pla-troops-patrolling-doklam-to-exercise-sovereignty-china/articleshow/60974831.cms
    1
  14377. It's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs". (German: Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen) The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits.
    1
  14378.  @strnglhld  "Because she DID say that he raped her. She said that they had relations without her consent." That's a serious accusation, do you have evidence that she said that he raped her? I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and she'd known Zhang Gaoli seven years ago before he became a Politburo Standing Committee member and she actually consented to sex in the end, this was what she wrote: "Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well." So according to Peng Shuai's post, the sex was consensual, so where's did she say that she was raped or had relations without her consent?
    1
  14379.  @wonjinum2258  President Trumps tariffs won't last forever. Once Trump steps down from being US President, what if the next US President decides to reverse Trump's policies, and lift the US-China trade war? This would possibly result in a future economic boom for China, and US-China trade relations resume their pre trade war levels.
    1
  14380.  @머쓸이  The United States clearly lacks a long-term strategy against China. On the other hand, the Chinese government has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's direction and future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc, and to set specific goals for China to achieve. Also, by abolishing the Chinese presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. But American Presidents lack this luxury, since US presidents are forced to step down after 4-8 years, when their presidential term ends, and thus, US presidents can only make short-term plans for America's future, instead of long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more.
    1
  14381.  @bbokdoong  Then if you got problems with China, why not complain to Chinese embassy then? Why bash China when it is South Korea taking the US side? If you treat China like enemy, then Chinese people will treat you like one as well.
    1
  14382. @HYUNWOO JUNG How is North Korea affected by China? N. Korea's econom is crippled because of America slapping sanctions on it (just like USA slap sanctions on Iran Nuclear Deal and Russia) Any country slapped with sanctions is going to suffer economically. China wants to help develop North Korea and open its economy up, but we can't do anything helpful because of US sanctions.
    1
  14383.  @bbokdoong  Excuse me, but since you can bash China, then similarly why can't I bash South Korea as well? I mean you are the one picking a fight with China with your post isn't it? If South Korea is 3rd party, then South Korea should be neutral party, instead of purposely taking sides isn't it?
    1
  14384.  @teddington95  If you take a look at history, human society is full of kings, emperors and other monarchs. Democracy on the other hand, has a long history of failure and was unpopular outside of Greece. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, and even Republic of Rome eventually fell. Whereas most of the rest of the world adopted monarchy, because it is stable and simply because it worked! Modern Western democracy has a short history of maybe 200-300 years that's all, so its no guarantee that it's going to be successful. Whereas China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has always been under dictatorship rule (and it worked for China) so why can't China continue under our own system them? Not every country has to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  14385.  leotube39  The Chinese PLA forces did not venture far from the 38th parallel dividing the North and South. But earlier the US forces pushed North Korean troops (which had initially literally 99% unified Korea) back past the 38th parallel and right to China's doorstep (Liaoning province) I mean, the Korean War is internal civil war and should be fought by Koreans (North and South) themselves. If Korea was unified because of foreign power United States, then Korea would become another US lapdog.
    1
  14386.  leotube39  About Trump's reelection, from what I understand, President Trump's ratings are low and Trump's tariffs are extremely unpopular among American businesses and farmers. So it's highly likely that the next POTUS might reverse Trump's unpopular policies and lift the trade war. His opposition would want to do the exact opposite of what Trump is doing in order to win at the polls.
    1
  14387.  leotube39  You can't refute my points so you resort to abusing racial slurs against me is that it? The North Koreans requested Chinese aid against the USA and N. Korea was China's ally so we came to their aid so that's why Chinese troops were sent to Korean peninsular. It was the USA who first choose to declare war on North Korea and invade Korean soil, pushing the North forces back to the 38th parallel and beyond, so shouldn't you be blaming the USA for interfering in internal civil war in Korea? Even today, Chinese troops have withdrawn from North Korea and there are ZERO Chinese bases in North Korea, whereas South Korea still has American bases and troops stationed there. So what's all this talk about PLA troops being on the Korean peninsula then, when there are US troops stationed there?
    1
  14388.  @draculwarmz96  Hong Kong's status as thriving port city has been surpassed by rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan, as well as facing increasing levels of competition from other upcoming mainland cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian, etc. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports Source: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage And this is in spite of mainland cities being under communist party rule, while Hong Kong is suffering under its own democratic government. No wonder why the people of Hong Kong feel like they're being left behind as mainland cities start to surpass Hong Kong.
    1
  14389.  @LiuXiang411  Sadly, it's the majority of American citizens themselves that voted those US politicians into power.
    1
  14390.  @MarkYeung1  President Xi Jinping has shown to be a strong and competent leader, then what's wrong with having him as President in order to maximise the benefits to China?
    1
  14391. Since you vehemently oppose China's solution, then what do you propose yourself to solve the problem? Westerners are literally bending over backwards and over accommodate the Muslims. Refugees are fleeing their conflict ridden Islamic countries and flooding Western countries and are under little pressure to adapt to their predominantly host countries culture, much to the chagrin of locals. Instead of assimilating, Muslims continue their practices like Muslim men taking on multiple wives and Muslim women wearing headveil out in public, and secretly many Westerners are angry at this, but can't voice their true opinion for fear of offending someone's political correctness and being labelled as racists and Islamophobe. The Muslims take Westerners silence as accept of their cultures, which is why most Muslims are under little pressure to assimilate into their host countries.
    1
  14392.  @rv8804  Whoever said anything about a mass murder at Tiananmen Square? According to Jay Mathews of The Washington Post, as far as can be determined from the available evidence, NO ONE DIED that night in Tiananmen Square, and all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. Source: The Myth of Tiananmen archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php
    1
  14393.  @ericcartmann  China blocking rare earth exports would mean the prices of rare earth increases outside of China. Chipmakers and wafer fabs will find it increasingly expensive and difficult to operate due to high costs of rare earths and will want to come to China to access the plentiful and affordable rare earth within China. Because these companies pursue profit over all else, and China is the more profitable rare earth supplier.
    1
  14394.  @Tam55511   Google left China of their own accord, because they were losing their market share to Baidu. According to Forbes, Google's market share climbed from 15% (mid-2006) to 31% (2010) but Baidu's market share increased from 47% (mid-2006) to 64% (2010) which is a huge lead. Source: Forbes: Why Google Is Quitting China forbes.com/2010/01/15/baidu-china-search-intelligent-technology-google.html Furthermore, Baidu offers several popular features for Chinese market as compared to Google, so that's why Google choose to exit the Chinese market voluntarily after failing to secure a market in China.
    1
  14395.  @richarde.halliburton8022  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14396.  @richarde.halliburton8022  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  14397.  @richarde.halliburton8022  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14398.  @richarde.halliburton8022  Even the United States recognize that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14399. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14400. ​ @LGB-FJB If you don't understand how racist it is to compare a yellow cartoon bear with small eyes to an Asian man, then you're beyond help.
    1
  14401. ​ @LGB-FJB If you don't understand the racist connotations behind comparing a yellow cartoon bear with small eyes to a Chinese, then you're beyond help.
    1
  14402. ​ @LGB-FJB You're using a yellow cartoon bear with small eyes to refer to a Chinese?
    1
  14403. ​ @LGB-FJB It's racist to compare a yellow cartoon bear with small eyes to the Chinese president. Like comparing Obama to King Kong.
    1
  14404. ​ @LGB-FJB It's as racist as comparing Obama to King Kong.
    1
  14405. @ You're comparing the Chinese president to a yellow cartoon bear with small eyes, can't you see the racial stereotyping?
    1
  14406. @LGB-FJB You're comparing a Chinese to a yellow cartoon bear with small eyes.
    1
  14407. @LGB-FJB So you think comparing Obama to King Kong is not rasist?
    1
  14408. @MarcoMasseria  Because having yellow skin and small eyes are common Asian stereotypes and it so happens that Winnie the Pooh has these features.
    1
  14409. @MarcoMasseria Because having yellow skin and small eyes are common Asian stereotypes and it so happens that Winnie the Pooh has these features.
    1
  14410.  @namelesssnitchy  It's useless for the U.S to try and stop the transition of the world from uni-polar to multi-polar.
    1
  14411.  @MarkYeung1  If you read up on the Sino Vietnam War, the U.S actually instigated China to punish Vietnam for their invasion of Kampuchea (Cambodia), which was why when U.S president Jimmy Carter asked Deng Xiaoping about Vietnam, he replied: "The child is getting naughty, it is time he got spanked" (小朋友不听话，该打打屁股了).
    1
  14412.  @MarkYeung1  The U.S had encouraged China to punish Vietnam for their invasion of Cambodia. That's why Vice Premier Deng replied: "The child is getting naughty, it is time he got spanked" (小朋友不听话，该打打屁股了) to U.S President Kennedy.
    1
  14413.  @CalvinK300  China knows that if Russia falls, the next NATO target will be China.
    1
  14414.  @MarkYeung1  If the West wants China to be a mediator in the Russo-Ukraine conflict, then they should be wooing China with incentives, instead of threatening China with sanctions.
    1
  14415.  @MarkYeung1  When President Jimmy Carter asked Vice Premier Deng Xiaoping on how he plans to handle Vietnam, Deng's response was "The child is getting naughty, it is time he got spanked" (小朋友不听话，该打打屁股了). That's how the Sino-Vietnam War started because USA promised to develop economic relations with China if China do that.
    1
  14416.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou no. those resistant fighters were surrounded and forced to surrender." But the Azov Battalion choose to surrender, whereas Zelenskyy wanted those Azov soldiers to fight to the death, prolonging the war unnecessary. Zelenskyy deliberately choose to arm civilians with rifles and weapons, thus maximizing the civilian casualties. Zelenskyy even removed the age restrictions for conscripts, basically allowing child soldiers to fight, so shouldn't the shame be upon Ukraine's leader?
    1
  14417.  @t1990322  Tibetans born in China are granted Chinese citizenship the moment they are born, aren't they Chinese citizens?
    1
  14418.  @t1990322  Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14419. 轮子只靠黑中国吃饭。
    1
  14420. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  14421.  @timothychung4811  Perhaps your sentence needs to be phrased better? You said: "I don't get this video or who is saying such c**p," which sounds like you don't understand this video at all, and that you think Cyrus is talking rubbish.
    1
  14422. 战忽局同志辛苦了。
    1
  14423.  @yepperooyepperoo5800  What circular economics are you talking about? As for cheap goods, Chinese workers make products (like smartphones, computers, appliances, electronics, clothing, sneakers, toys, etc) cheap, so that inflation in America is kept to minimum and the cost of living in America is lower than it should be. Think of the billions of dollars Americans saved on living expenses over the years thanks to Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursuits like cars and luxury brands.
    1
  14424.  @yepperooyepperoo5800  When the USA manufactures stuff, mobile phones were hugely overpriced and mostly unaffordable to the masses. But after being outsourced to China, mobile phones became cheaper and affordable to the masses. So if cell phones were to return to USA, the pricing would be beyond the range of what most Americans can even afford.
    1
  14425.  Beast Mode  It's no secret that the U.S is in decline and China is rising. Time is on China's side and China just needs to avoid getting suckered into an unnecessary war. As long as peace prevails, the U.S will decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise anymore.
    1
  14426.  @tomvanaarle2622  Believe it or not, even after all that's happened, Russia is still supplying gas to Ukraine, even as we speak! That's why Russia has never formally declared war on Ukraine, it's a special military operation that's all.
    1
  14427.  @junebug8485  The Nayirah testimony is not the only hoax that the U.S uses to justify support for war. The U.S also claimed that Iraq possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction to justify the U.S invasion of Iraq, yet no WMDs were ever found in Iraq. According to Iraq Body Count, some 200,000 Iraqi civilians have been killed as a result of the war in Iraq.
    1
  14428.  @junebug8485  The Nayirah testimony is not the only hoax that the U.S uses to justify support for war. The U.S also claimed that Iraq possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction to justify the U.S invasion of Iraq, yet no WMDs were ever found in Iraq.
    1
  14429.  @junebug8485  Not just the Nayirah testimony. The U.S also claimed that Iraq possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction to justify the U.S invasion of Iraq, yet no WMDs were ever found in Iraq.
    1
  14430.  @tomvanaarle2622  Believe me, you won't like it when Russia formally declares war on Ukraine. Up till now, Russian forces have only mobilized an expeditionary force for the special military operation in Ukraine, while the bulk of their armed forces remains in Russia. And there's still the fact that Russia continues to supply Ukraine with gas, even till today. Which country at war would do that with the enemy?
    1
  14431.  @user-fb2me3th6z  If anything, it's actually the United States that's crying about China all the time. Eventually, the U.S will decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise anymore, so that's why the U.S is making all the noise it can today towards China.
    1
  14432.  @user-fb2me3th6z  If anything, it's actually the United States that's crying about China all the time and unable to deal with it.
    1
  14433.  @user-fb2me3th6z  Who's really crying here? If anything it's coming from the U.S, because U.S is unable to deal with China's rise.
    1
  14434. If anything, it's actually the United States that's crying about China all the time. Eventually, the U.S will decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise anymore, so that's why the U.S is making all the noise it can today towards China.
    1
  14435.  @tomvanaarle2622  Because Russia has clearly not mobilized the full extent of its army towards Ukraine, that's why it's an expeditionary force. And Ukraine is literally siphoning off Russian gas that flows through the pipeline passing through Ukraine from Russia to the EU countries And it appears you're unable to refute my points, so you've started hurling accusations that I'm being paid by Putin?
    1
  14436.  @tomvanaarle2622  Because Russia has clearly not mobilized the full extent of its army towards Ukraine, that's why it's an expeditionary force. And Ukraine is literally siphoning off Russian gas that flows through the pipeline passing through Ukraine from Russia to the EU countries.
    1
  14437.  @tomvanaarle2622  Because Russia has clearly not mobilized the full extent of its army towards Ukraine, that's why it's an expeditionary force. And Ukraine is literally siphoning off Russian gas that flows through the pipeline passing through Ukraine.
    1
  14438.  @tomvanaarle2622  We are in the 21st century and you can literally look up news about Ukraine siphoning off Russian gas passing through the pipeline to the EU. And you can't refute my points so you've resorted to hurling accusations of me being somehow paid by Putin?
    1
  14439.  @tomvanaarle2622  We are in the 21st century and you can literally look up news about Ukraine siphoning off Russian gas passing through the pipeline to the EU
    1
  14440.  @tomvanaarle2622  Look up news about Ukraine siphoning off Russian gas passing through the pipeline to the EU.
    1
  14441.  @tomvanaarle2622  Go and look it up, Russia is supplying gas to Ukraine even as we speak.
    1
  14442.  @tomvanaarle2622  Ukraine has been siphoning Russian gas flowing through the pipeline on the way to EU.
    1
  14443.  @akashkrishnat481  Mongolia has since given up on reclaiming their former territories. You're from India right? If India sees no problem claiming "historical territory" like Goa, Manipur, Sikkim, Nagaland, Jammu & Kashmir, then can't China claim Tibet for those same historical reasons?
    1
  14444.  @tomvanaarle2622  I literally gave you proof, but you just refused to accept it that's all.
    1
  14445.  @danfisher7458  China is already North Korea's biggest trading partner. I'm sure Chinese companies would love to conduct even more business with DPRK, if not for UN slapping sanctions on North Korea. If the UN lifts those sanctions, China and North Korea would most likely expand business relations with each other even further.
    1
  14446.  @bignoseYeu  If you want to talk about prison populations, then it's actually the United States has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity, that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons.
    1
  14447.  @rightsdontcomewithpermits7073  Take skyscrapers for example. China literally built more skyscrapers than any other in the world, according to Skyscraper Center. Countries by number of 150m+ Buildings 1. China (2,919) 2. United States (857) 3. United Arab Emirates (311) 4. South Korea (273) 5. Japan (270) 6. Malaysia (262) 7. Australia (140) 8. Indonesia (128) 9. Canada (124) 10. Thailand (124) ... Source: Skyscraper Center
    1
  14448.  @bignoseYeu  China's "ghost cities" are slowly being filled up as millions of people migrate from the rural countryside to the urban centers. For example, in 2011, London's Daily Mail reported that Zhengzhou was China's largest “Ghost City.” But fast forward till today and Zhengzhou is home to a population of 12,600,574 inhabitants with a total GDP of 1.014 trillion (RMB) in 2018.
    1
  14449.  @bignoseYeu  China's ghost cities are being filled up over the years, as millions migrate from the rural countryside to the urban centers. For example, in 2011, London's Daily Mail reported that the city of Zhengzhou was China's largest ghost city. But today, Zhengzhou is home to a population of 12 million inhabitants with GDP of 1.014 trillion (RMB) in 2018.
    1
  14450.  @bignoseYeu  China's ghost cities are being filled up over the years, as millions migrate from the rural countryside to the urban centers. For example, in 2011, London's Daily Mail reported that the city of Zhengzhou was China's largest ghost city. But today, Zhengzhou is home to a population of 12,600,574 inhabitants.
    1
  14451.  @bignoseYeu  You asked: "Unlike the uyghurs in China that get send to "reeducation camp" for what reason?" Xinjiang used to be plagued by numerous terrorist attacks such as the 5 February 1992 Urumqi Bombings, 1997 Urumqi bus bombings, 2008 Kashgar attack, July 2009 Urumqi riots, 2010 Aksu bombing, 2011 Hotan attack, 2011 Kashgar attacks, April 2014 Urumqi attack,_ etc, mostly by misguided Uighurs. The re-education program is meant to de-radicalize those people and since then, there hasn't been any terrorist attack in Xinjiang since. It shows that China's method to deal with terrorists is to educate them with skills and vocational training so that they'll join back as productive members of society.
    1
  14452.  @bignoseYeu  You asked: "Unlike the uyghurs in China that get send to "reeducation camp" for what reason?" Xinjiang used to be plagued by numerous terrorist attacks such as the 5 February 1992 Urumqi Bombings, 1997 Urumqi bus bombings, 2008 Kashgar attack, July 2009 Urumqi riots, 2010 Aksu bombing, 2011 Hotan attack, 2011 Kashgar attacks, April 2014 Urumqi attack,_ etc, mostly by misguided Uighurs. The re-education program is meant to de-radicalize those people and since then, there hasn't been any terrorist attack in Xinjiang since.
    1
  14453.  @bignoseYeu  You asked: "Unlike the uyghurs in China that get send to "reeducation camp" for what reason?" Xinjiang used to be plagued by numerous terrorist attacks such as the 5 February 1992 Urumqi Bombings, 1997 Urumqi bus bombings, 2008 Kashgar attack, July 2009 Urumqi riots, 2010 Aksu bombing, 2011 Hotan attack, 2011 Kashgar attacks, April 2014 Urumqi attack,_ etc. The re-education program is meant to de-radicalize those people and since then, there hasn't been any terrorist attack in Xinjiang since.
    1
  14454.  @rightsdontcomewithpermits7073  Not only does China build skyscrapers, but China has arguably the world's best infrastructure construction. China is home to many of the world's longest, tallest and highest bridges, breaking many world records. Source: Wikipedia: List of longest bridges, Wikipedia: List of longest bridges, Wikipedia: List of highest bridges.
    1
  14455.  @rightsdontcomewithpermits7073  China is home to the world's largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen High speed rail in terms of track length. Our high speed trains are very fast, the journeys smooth and enjoyable, and passengers even balanced a coin on its side on a train travelling at 350 kph without the coin tipping over. High Speed Railway Construction by Country (2019) 1. China ( km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. France (3,870 km) 4. Germany (3,596 km) 5. Japan (3,422 km) 6. Russia (2,026 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,997 km) 8. Italy (1,697 km) 9. South Korea (1,481 km) 10. Finland (744 km) ... Source: Video: High-Speed Railway (HSR) Construction by Country (1965-2019)
    1
  14456.  @rightsdontcomewithpermits7073  China also built the Beijing Daxing International Airport (北京大兴国际机场) in just 5 years of construction, spanning 700,000 square metres (7,500,000 sq ft), earning the title of the world's largest single-building airport terminal. The airport is planned to be able to handle 120 - 200 million passengers a year, which, if capacity were fully used, would make it the world's busiest airport by passenger traffic, surpassing Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport by far.
    1
  14457.  @rightsdontcomewithpermits7073  Is insulting Chinese infrastructure the only thing you are capable of?
    1
  14458.  @rightsdontcomewithpermits7073  China also built the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply clean, renewable energy and reduce our reliance on fossil fuels.
    1
  14459.  @danfisher7458  North Koreans have travelled to China for educational or exchange purposes, what makes you think they can't travel to China?
    1
  14460.  @bignoseYeu  I've literally shown you proof that China's ghost cities are filling up. Pudong was initially one of the first ghost cities of China, but now it's a prominent global financial district of Shanghai, so its apparent that time is needed to slowly fill up these cities. China still has a lot of rural people migrating to the urban centers every year.
    1
  14461.  @bignoseYeu  What recent leaks? The Human Rights Council Chief (Michelle Bachelet) visited Xinjiang and issued a statement about raising concerns about the application of counter-terrorism and de-radicalisation measures in Xinjiang, and China has responded that those vocational training centers have been dismantled.
    1
  14462.  @danfisher7458  What documentary is that? Are you sure you can thrust what the documentary says?
    1
  14463.  @bignoseYeu  Even the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Michelle Bachelet had already visited Xinjiang and raised concerns regarding the vocational training centers, what more do you demand?
    1
  14464.  @bignoseYeu  What are the names of the 50 cities you claim were ghost cities? I've already made my point that millions of rural migrants are traveling to the urban centers and slowly filling up those cities over time. For example, Kangbashi, Ordos City in Inner Mongolia was the archetypal ghost city 10 years ago, but 91% of homes in the district are occupied today.
    1
  14465.  @bignoseYeu  Bachelet said that because of the Covid bubble they weren’t able to meet everyone. But with the people she was able to speak to, it was in an unsupervised manner. Also, those education centers impart vocation skills to Uighurs, granting them better employment prospects upon graduation.
    1
  14466.  @bignoseYeu  The population of Uighurs in China has nearly quadrupled from 3 million (1953) to 11 million (2020). That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    1
  14467. @Matheus Froehlich China's propaganda can't hold a candle to the United States propaganda. Hardly anyone believe Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV, even though they present data drawn from primary sources. Whereas Western propaganda is very effective. Almost everyone just blindly believe what Western MSM says about China even when its unsubstantiated by proof.
    1
  14468. @Matheus Froehlich Hardly anyone believe Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV, even though they present data drawn from primary sources. Whereas Western propaganda is very effective. Almost everyone just blindly believe what Western MSM says about China even when its unsubstantiated by proof.
    1
  14469.  @bignoseYeu  You said: "thats what China does best" If China's propaganda were that good, then why is it China is having a hard time convincing Western audiences? Whereas American MSM just say something negative about China and many Western audiences just gobble up the information.
    1
  14470.  @bignoseYeu  You said: "thats what China does best" If it were that good, then why is it China is having a hard time convincing Western audiences? Whereas American MSM just say something negative about China and many Western audiences just gobble up the information.
    1
  14471. @Matheus Froehlich If it were that good, then why is it China is having a hard time convincing Western audiences?
    1
  14472. @Matheus Froehlich "The fact that you and the rest of the world see china as the new good guy is just sad" How so? China's rise has been extraordinary and yet relative peaceful compared to the rise of other powers such as Britain (19th century), USA and Soviet Union (20th century), then isn't this cause for celebration? If China can someday overtake the United States someday in the foreseeable future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this eventual goal of ours?
    1
  14473.  @bignoseYeu  It implies that Western allegations of an Uighur genocide are unfounded, given that the population of Uighurs in China nearly quadrupled from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. About the One Child Policy, in the past China was still dirt-poor country, suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems at that time. Why allow families in China to raise multiple kids, only for them to starve to death, succumb to childhood diseases, and having not enough food, not enough hospitals, and not enough schools to send them all to? Why not make families focus all available resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood, and get him into a good school? According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Look at India, world's 2nd largest population country, and India is suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems that China once suffered from in the past.
    1
  14474.  @bignoseYeu  Indeed, you're correct that most Americans don't believe Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV, Global Times, you name it! Then why do you seem to claim that propaganda is "what China does best" when nobody believes Chinese media? Doesn't the reality contradict your statement?
    1
  14475.  @bignoseYeu  Indeed, you're correct that most Americans don't believe Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV, Global Times, you name it! Then why do you seem to claim that propganda is "what China does best" when nobody believes Chinese media? Doesn't the reality contradict your statement?
    1
  14476.  @bignoseYeu  "神州 Shenzhou people in America don't believe mainstream media anymore." Then why do you believe the allegations of ongoing genocide in Xinjiang, given that the population of Uighurs has nearly quadrupled in size?
    1
  14477.  @bignoseYeu  Have you read the report by the independent source The Grayzone on the allegations of millions of Uighurs in detention? Turns out that this figure of one million came from two highly dubious studies, one of which only interviewed 8 Uighurs on what they each think the number of Uighurs detained is, before extrapolating the results to arrive at one million in detention. The claim that China has detained millions of ethnic Uyghurs in its Xinjiang region is repeated with increasing frequency, but little scrutiny is ever applied. Yet a closer look at the figure and how it was obtained reveals a serious deficiency in data. While this extraordinary claim is treated as unassailable in the West, it is, in fact, based on two highly dubious “studies.” The first, by the US government-backed Network of Chinese Human Rights Defenders, formed its estimate by interviewing a grand total of eight people. Source: The Grayzone: China detaining millions of Uyghurs?
    1
  14478.  @bignoseYeu  Have you read the report by the independent source The Grayzone on the allegations of millions of Uighurs in detention? Turns out that this figure of one million came from two highly dubious studies, one of which only interviewed 8 Uighurs on what they each think the number of Uighurs detained is, before extrapolating the results to arrive at one million in detention. While CHRD states that it interviewed dozens of ethnic Uyghurs in the course of its study, their enormous estimate was ultimately based on interviews with exactly eight Uyghur individuals. ... Source: The Grayzone: China detaining millions of Uyghurs?
    1
  14479.  @bignoseYeu  Have you read the report by the independent source The Grayzone on the allegations of millions of Uighurs in detention? Turns out that this figure of one million came from two highly dubious studies, one of which only interviewed 8 Uighurs on what they each think the number of Uighurs detained is, before extrapolating the results to arrive at one million in detention.
    1
  14480.  @bignoseYeu  Then what oppression are you referring to? Even the International Criminal Court (ICC) has asked for more evidence before it will be willing to open an investigation into claims of genocide against Uighur people by China.
    1
  14481.  @bignoseYeu  Then what oppression are you referring to? Even the ICC has asked for more evidence before it will be willing to open an investigation into claims of genocide against Uighur people by China.
    1
  14482.  @bignoseYeu  Then what oppression are you referring to? Even the International Criminal Court (ICC) said there is still insufficient evidence and has asked for more evidence before it will be willing to open an investigation.
    1
  14483.  @bignoseYeu  You said: "Even th ETAA has lots of info on this subject." The name "East Turkestan" is a literally a fake name coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists (including Nikita Bichurin) who intended the name to replace the common Western term for the region, Chinese Turkestan. It's a separatist movement of a country that has never actually existed at all, instead it's part of Chinese territory.
    1
  14484.  @bignoseYeu  "神州 Shenzhou the ICC either denied or confirmed" So why don't Westerners present their evidence to the ICC? And we've already discussed this before that the UN Human Rights Commissioner (Michelle Bachelet) visited Xinjiang, so what more do you want? China also invited Mike Pompeo to visit Xinjiang and see for himself that there are no human rights violation, but Pompeo declined this invitation.
    1
  14485.  @bignoseYeu  "神州 Shenzhou check the Xinjiang leaks." Those Xinjiang documents contain a lot of grammatical mistakes and it doesn't even conform with CPC's official format. Most likely it was originally written in English and then translated poorly into Chinese.
    1
  14486.  @bignoseYeu  "神州 Shenzhou maybe not millions but thousands of them." I thought you said "神州 Shenzhou people in America don't believe mainstream media anymore." then why do you believe the allegations of Uighur genocide without proof?
    1
  14487.  @bignoseYeu  You said: "When has CCP invited Pompeo. Send links" Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying invited U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to come to China and visit Xinjiang to see for himself that there are no human rights violations against the region’s Uighur Muslim minority. ... Source: Reuters: China foreign ministry says Pompeo welcome to visit Xinjiang
    1
  14488.  @bignoseYeu  Is there something wrong with using a VPN?
    1
  14489.  @bignoseYeu  "神州 Shenzhou "Chinese turkestan"?" That's the original name that Westerners used to refer to Xinjiang, before Russian Turkologists came up with a replacement name called East Turkestan. So in essence, it's actually foreigners renaming actual Chinese territory to create the illusion of a separatist history, when there was never such a country all along, it was historically part of China.
    1
  14490.  @bignoseYeu  You asked: "Isn't it illegal in China?" Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for youself?Hotels catering to foreigners in China offer VPN services to clients during their stay. Universities in China provide VPN access for students that need to access Western sources for their research. Many foreigner companies that come to China and set up shop here require access to Western websites like Facebook, Twitter, Google, in order to operate, so the government issue VPN license to these companies.
    1
  14491.  @bignoseYeu  What makes you say that VPN is not available to the people of China? Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like for yourself? I mean, nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    1
  14492.  @bignoseYeu  VPNs actually offer several benefits to users, such as increased privacy, and preventing data throttling and avoiding bandwidth throttling. Sometimes when booking flights or hotels online, using a VPN to make like your in another country may grant you access to cheaper or better deals on such websites.
    1
  14493.  @bignoseYeu  But what makes you think VPN is illegal in China, when our hotels provide VPN services? Our university campuses have VPN service for students needing to access Western research papers, so who said VPN is illegal in China?
    1
  14494.  @bignoseYeu  Chinese video blogger 李子柒Liziqi has a YouTube channel with more than 2.7 billion views and 16 million subscribers (as verified on 21 August 2021) Her channel even broke the Guinness World Record for "The most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube". Yet you claim VPN is illegal in China?
    1
  14495.  @bignoseYeu  Chinese video blogger 李子柒 Liziqi has a YouTube channel with more than 2.7 billion views and 16 million subscribers (as verified on 21 August 2021) Her channel even broke the Guinness World Record for "The most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube". Yet you claim VPN is illegal in China?
    1
  14496.  @bignoseYeu  Have you heard of LiZiQi? She is a Chinese vlogger on YouTube that broke the world record for "The most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube".
    1
  14497.  @bignoseYeu  Statistics show that around 31% of Chinese Internet users use VPN in 2017. Those government approved VPNs with backdoor access applies to companies and corporations rather than individuals.
    1
  14498.  @bignoseYeu  VPNs help provide increased data privacy to users while surfing the Internet, and in some cases, allow for better deals when booking air tickets, train fares, or hotels.
    1
  14499.  @bignoseYeu  "神州 Shenzhou so what you are telling me, that i cant get VPN of my choice." Did I ever say that?
    1
  14500. ​ @bignoseYeu  "神州 Shenzhou if the government has a backdoor access to VPN companies, they have access to any individual" Explain how is that so? It's like you just irrationally jump to conclusions about China without actually setting foot in China and seeing what life is like here for yourself.
    1
  14501.  @bignoseYeu  I mean, what's your point? We've already established that people in China can access YouTube through VPN, then what's your point?
    1
  14502.  @bignoseYeu  "神州 Shenzhou so basically its illegal to have VPN thats not approved the Government" Like I said those government approved VPNs with backdoor access applies to companies and corporations rather than individuals. Did you even read what I wrote?
    1
  14503.  @bignoseYeu  "神州 Shenzhou yea but there no point in using a vpn if the government has control over it." Why? So many companies come to China to set up shop and they applied for VPN license from the government gotten it approved, so what's your point?
    1
  14504.  @bignoseYeu  "神州 Shenzhou which means the government has access to all your data. Even if you use a vpn" Didn't Wiki Leaks and Snowden revealed the same behavior by the United States government?
    1
  14505.  @bignoseYeu  "神州 Shenzhou yea but most people in the US dont use a VPN. Thats why the NSA had access to everything" Well, that's exactly my point that VPNs offer better privacy protection compared to Internet users who don't use VPN. So you are arguing in favor of more widespread VPN usage then? Then we are in agreement here.
    1
  14506.  @bignoseYeu  "神州 Shenzhou not talking about companies or corporations" But like I said, the law that VPNs must provide the government with backdoor access to be approved, applies to companies and corporations rather than individuals. Did you actually read my comment?
    1
  14507.  @bignoseYeu  "神州 Shenzhou and most companies and corporations use VPNs because of China firewall to a access websites geo-blocked in China" That's correct. Every country have their own list of banned websites, not just China alone. For example, there exists a list of websites blocked in the United Kingdom.
    1
  14508.  @bignoseYeu  Why are we even talking about VPNs in the first place? Weren't we talking about alledged Uighur genocide in China, yet the data shows that the population of Uighurs in China has nearly quadrupled in size from 3 million (1953) to 11 million (2020) according to ethnic population census? Seems like you can't refute my point, so you suddenly bring up VPNs for no reason.
    1
  14509.  @bignoseYeu  "I never disagreed on that point" I'm glad that we have at least come to the agreement on something.
    1
  14510.  @bignoseYeu  "神州 Shenzhou well how do most people in China access YouTube??" Using VPN of course.
    1
  14511. Taiwan wasn't even listed as a destination on Nancy Pelosi's trip to Asia and she had to sneak into the island in the middle of the night.
    1
  14512. Taiwan wasn't even listed as a destination on Nancy Pelosi's trip to Asia and she had to sneak into the island in the middle of the night.
    1
  14513. Taiwan wasn't even listed as a destination on Nancy Pelosi's trip to Asia and she had to sneak into the island in the middle of the night.
    1
  14514. Taiwan wasn't even listed as a destination on Nancy Pelosi's trip to Asia and she had to sneak into the island in the middle of the night.
    1
  14515.  @andrenogueira5058  Western Journalists have long been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2022, and China's economy is still going.
    1
  14516. @Teringventje During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue buying Chinese silk, porcelain and drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  14517. @Teringventje What makes you think Hong Kong is light years ahead of the mainland? China today is the world's 2nd largest economy and still growing, whereas Hong Kong's economy is ranked 34th in the world and is currently in a recession. Source: Hong Kong plunges into deep recession theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/31/hong-kong-plunges-into-deep-recession
    1
  14518. @Teringventje China has produced many successful Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, ZTE, LENOVO, DJI, Haier, Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, NetEase, Meituan-Dianping, Bank of China, ICBC, AgBank, China Construction Bank, Ping An Insurance, Sinopec Group, China National Petroleum, China Minmetals, China State Construction, and the list goes on. Many of these companies have successfully made it onto business magazines like Forbes Global 2000 and Fortune Global 500 Sources: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies Forbes Global 2000 wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Global_2000 Fortune Global 500 wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_Global_500 But where are all the famous companies from Hong Kong you tell me? How can Hong Kong possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic might of the mainland?
    1
  14519. +Edin743 What Taiwan democracy? Taiwan was ruled for nearly its entire life by authoritarian single-party KMT. Only in 2016 (2 years ago) did another political party (DPP) took over the KMT at the reins. Much of Taiwan's great progress and prosperity occurred under KMT dictatorship. Even South Korea had that S. Korean dictator, Park Chung Hee, whom led a period of rapid economic growth in S. Korea, sometimes called the Miracle on the Han River. Park has been ranked by the public as the greatest South Korean president but he still remains a controversial figure for his dictatorship and authoritarian ways.
    1
  14520.  @zackk4393  Chloe Zhao is just a director. Haven't you heard what the former Director of CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo said? "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole!"
    1
  14521. + Mahesh Kumar B R I clearly mentioned that China's anti-satellite weapons are meant to take out Indian Army's satellite out of orbit. Can't you read?
    1
  14522. + Sachin Sreenivasan The Brahmos Missile is a supersonic missile, whereas China has hypersonic missiles like DF-ZF that capable of traveling up to Mach 10 (or 10 times the speed of sound, hence the term hypersonic missile)
    1
  14523. +Prabakar Santanam India's Kali weapon is only capable of a single use so far. The PLA Rocket Force can always fire multiple volleys of ICBMs in rapid succession, while the KALI is inactive due to its coolingdown period.
    1
  14524.  @kunalsharma9087  China has successfully tested a cutting-edge hypersonic aircraft, Xingkong-2 (星空-2) or Starry Sky-2. Video: Military News: China tests hypersonic aircraft Starry Sky-2 youtu.be/aVWQ2uOCepU Starry Sky-2 was launched using a rocket and the aircraft rides shockwaves generated by its hypersonic flight and the test craft maintained speeds above Mach 5.5 for more than 400 seconds, reaching a top speed of 7,344 kmph. Experts say that the aircraft's speed and unpredictable trajectory will challenge modern missile defense systems.
    1
  14525.  @MarkYeung1  The United States has 4% of the world's population, yet is home to more than 25% of the world's Covid-19 cases and deaths. Surely that's more important news compared to Hong Kong's death rate.
    1
  14526.  @MarkYeung1  Here's a question for you to ponder: If the Chinese MSM really portray the USA in a negative light, then why is it many Chinese still travel to the United States, if Chinese media only show negative coverage of USA? Where does the impetus for Chinese to travel to USA come from?
    1
  14527. China has anti-ship ballistic missiles like DF-21D (nicknamed "carrier killer") A US carrier costs about $15 billion dollars, compared to only about $1 million dollars for each DF-21D. Here is video animation of DF-21D in action Video:China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile youtube.com/watch?v=p-cEunmqXM8
    1
  14528.  @daomingjin  You said: "When a country is destroyed and it's government reformed it becomes a new country." Since when is China destroyed? Are there no more people living in China? No more buildings? Then how can you make the absurd claim that China stopped being a country? Because the Nationalist KMT are no longer in power? Who gives the KMT the right to decide China's sovereignty and legacy, given that they lost the mainland to the Communist Party of China?
    1
  14529.  @daomingjin  You said: "When a country is destroyed and it's government reformed it becomes a new country." Since when is China destroyed? Are there no more people living in China? No more buildings? Then how can you make the absurd claim that China stopped being a country? Because the Nationalist KMT are no longer in power? Who gives the Nationalist KMT the right to decide China's sovereignty and legacy, given that they lost the mainland to the communists?
    1
  14530.  @daomingjin  You said: "When a country is destroyed and it's government reformed it becomes a new country." Since when is China destroyed? Are there no more people living in China? No more buildings? Then how can you make the absurd claim that China stopped being a country? Because the Nationalist KMT are no longer in power? Who gives the Nationalist KMT the right to decide China's sovereignty and legacy, given that they lost the mainland to the CPC and had to flee to Taiwan island?
    1
  14531.  @daomingjin  Since when has China been destroyed? Are there no more people living in China? No more buildings? Then how can you make the absurd claim that China stopped being a country? Because the Nationalist KMT are no longer in power? Who gives the KMT the right to decide China's sovereignty and legacy, given that they lost the mainland and had to flee to Taiwan island?
    1
  14532.  @daomingjin  The point that HDsharp was trying to make is that Europe is not the same as China. After all, Chinese also migrated to the West, but does that suddenly mean they stopped being Chinese? There's this old saying: "You can take the Chinese out of China, but you can't take China out of the Chinese." Chinese culture resides in their hearts wherever they go. Chinatowns have sprung up all over the world, in virtually every major city, because the Chinese bring along their culture with them when they leave the mainland.
    1
  14533.  @MegaBanne  "The Chinese economy has collapsed." 1990. China's economy has come to a halt. The Economist 1996. China's economy will face a hard landing. The Economist 1998. China's economy’s dangerous period of sluggish growth. The Economist 1999. Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. Bank of Canada 2000. China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. Chicago Tribune 2001. A hard landing in China. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas 2002. China Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. Westchester University 2003. Banking crisis imperils China. New York Times 2004. The great fall of China? The Economist 2005. The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. Nouriel Roubini 2006. Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? International Economy 2007. Can China avoid a hard landing? TIME 2008. Hard Landing In China? Forbes 2009. China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. Fortune 2010: Hard landing coming in China. Nouriel Roubini 2011: Chinese Hard Landing Closer Than You Think. Business Insider 2012: Economic News from China: Hard Landing. American Interest 2013: A Hard Landing In China. Zero Hedge 2014. A hard landing in China. CNBC 2015. Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. Forbes 2016. Hard landing looms for China. The Economist 2017. Is China's Economy Going To Crash? National Interest 2018. China's Coming Financial Meltdown. The Daily Reckoning. 2019. China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? BBC 2020. Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. NY Times 2021 Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. Bloomberg 2022. China Surprise Data Could Spell Recession. Bloomberg. 2023. No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. Bloomberg ... But it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  14534.  @MegaBanne  "The Chinese economy has collapsed. You guys really are clueless." 1990. China's economy has come to a halt. The Economist 1996. China's economy will face a hard landing. The Economist 1998. China's economy’s dangerous period of sluggish growth. The Economist 1999. Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. Bank of Canada 2000. China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. Chicago Tribune 2001. A hard landing in China. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas 2002. China Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. Westchester University 2003. Banking crisis imperils China. New York Times 2004. The great fall of China? The Economist 2005. The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. Nouriel Roubini 2006. Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? International Economy 2007. Can China avoid a hard landing? TIME 2008. Hard Landing In China? Forbes 2009. China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. Fortune 2010: Hard landing coming in China. Nouriel Roubini 2011: Chinese Hard Landing Closer Than You Think. Business Insider 2012: Economic News from China: Hard Landing. American Interest 2013: A Hard Landing In China. Zero Hedge 2014. A hard landing in China. CNBC 2015. Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. Forbes 2016. Hard landing looms for China. The Economist 2017. Is China's Economy Going To Crash? National Interest 2018. China's Coming Financial Meltdown. The Daily Reckoning. 2019. China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? BBC 2020. Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. NY Times 2021 Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. Bloomberg 2022. China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n. Bloomberg. 2023. No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. Bloomberg ... But it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  14535.  @OptimalToast  About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    1
  14536.  @OptimalToast  You said: "Asian immigration was at an all time high, correct me if I'm wrong, but they made up the major group of immigrants, Chinese being a big portion." Yes, it was this huge influx of Chinese immigrants that contributed to local Australians' fear of being overrun by Asians and this formed the basis of the Yellow Peril mindset. You said: "This notion of 'yellow peril' isn't a mainstream thing, unless you're claiming all Asians are Chinese." I never said that all Asians are Chinese. But other Asians like Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese, etc are being lumped together and facing the same anti-Asian discrimination in Australia, that's why I used Asian instead of Chinese. You said: "In general, Australians don't dislike Chinese, we dislike the government," If that were the case, then how do you explain the anti-Asian hate crimes being committed against ordinary Asians in Australia? Even Asian Australians are being targeted, even though they certainly aren't communist party members themselves.
    1
  14537.  @iwanagohome326  "神州 Shenzhou Vietnam now forgive and forget," But strange, the Vietnam never forgave China from 1000 years ago, yet they forgive the USA. Today China is Vietnam's biggest trading partner, yet some Vietnamese nationalist still harbour anti-China sentiment, yet they easily forgive USA. It just doesn't make sense at all, US propaganda is really so powerful.
    1
  14538.  @RedHanded1969  Singapore has been ruled by authoritarian single-party PAP for its entire life as a nation. For 54 years, the People's Action Party ruled Singapore with an iron fist, and Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore's founder) was a dictator who tolerated no dissent, jailed and exiled dissidents and political rivals (Francis Seow for example). But it was under this authoritarian leadership that Singapore transformed from sleepy fishing village to a modern world-class country today, punching above its weight over many of its neighbours like Malaysia, Indonesia, etc. Singapore has opposition but Singapore's opposition suck, no one truly believes that they'll make a fine government, their job is exist to ensure that Singaporeans vote for the PAP. Singapore been ruled by authoritarian single-party PAP for 54 years, just like China been ruled by authoritarian single-party CPC for 71 years, then why can't China continue under authoritarian rule? It works, just like how Taiwan was successful under authoritarian single-party KMT rule. Why fix what isn't broken? Nobody said every country has to be adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  14539.  @RedHanded1969  The number of wealthy Chinese people has overtaken the number of rich Americans for the first time, according to a report by Credit Suisse. Source: China overtakes US in rankings of world’s richest people theguardian.com/business/2019/oct/21/china-overtakes-us-in-rankings-of-worlds-richest-people The bank’s annual wealth survey found there were 100 million Chinese people among the world’s top 10% of richest people, compared with 99 million in the US. About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA. The test is given every three years to 15-year-olds around the world and measures their knowledge in reading, science and mathematics. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    1
  14540.  @RedHanded1969  How is mainland China less productive that Taiwan? Mainland China has world's largest population and (statistically) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  14541.  @RedHanded1969  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA. The test is given every three years to 15-year-olds around the world and measures their knowledge in reading, science and mathematics. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    1
  14542. Hopefully more people in Taiwan wake up to the fact the USA doesn't care about Taiwan, as long as they can use the island as a chess piece to contain the mainland's rise.
    1
  14543.  @vietnguyen4312  But the Communist Party of China can manage the population successfully. According to a Harvard University study, around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China.
    1
  14544. ​ @Viet Nguyen But the Communist Party of China can manage the population successfully. According to a Harvard University study, around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China.
    1
  14545.  @firmaith  Ukraine had been supporting ultra-nationalist neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion that's carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Lugansk and Donetsk (referred collectively as Donbas) and some 13,000 people have been killed in the Donbas region by shelling by both sides over the course of 8 years. Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that began since the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukovych by USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Kiev.
    1
  14546.  @firmaith  "Russia still maintains Manchuria." Not all of Manchuria. China controls Inner Manchuria, while Russia controls Outer Manchuria. Just like China controls Inner Mongolia, while Mongolia is Outer Mongolia. I've a feeling that Ukraine might share the same fate, being divided with Eastern Ukraine falling under Russian control, and perhaps Poland absorbing Western Ukraine. Only time will tell. "And the navy China is building now is ridiculous, a thousand small ships." The People's Liberation Army Navy is the world's largest navy by number of ships, and since China is mostly patrolling South China Sea, then what's wrong with the employing the strategy of smaller ships to patrol the SCS? Only the U.S Navy wanting to maintain global dominance invests in having huge capital ships, which represent a significant drain on the U.S resources. "China benefitted from the American presence and your only reply is, China didn’t ask." You yourself admitted that the US benefits from it too, yet in another sentence you complained it cost the US more to maintain shipping lanes in the Pacific than it cost China, then can't I point out the fact that China did not ask for it? I even proposed a mutually beneficial solution, that USA withdraw their warships froom the SCS and leave the Chinese navy to protect our shipping lanes ourselves.
    1
  14547.  @vietnguyen4312  Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Even Taiwan doesn't have any famous smartphone companies like the mainland. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019
    1
  14548.  @billyhe2724  "神州 Shenzhou then why there is still homelessness problem?" Even Taiwan hasn't solved it's homelessness problems, so you expect the mainland to solve it 100%? Why hasn't a developed country like America solved their homeless problems? You said: "Millions of migrant workers left their property behind to seek economic opportunities elsewhere." Yeah, but these migrant workers still have their laojia (老家 "hometown") to return to where they can stay if they are unable to find work elsewhere.
    1
  14549.  @vietnguyen4312  "神州 Shenzhou China is not ready to even attempt reunification. Simple as that." I'm glad you appear to agree ostensibly that Taiwan will eventually reunify with the mainland, once the CPC improves by 4x and the mainland transitions into becoming a developed country from a developing country. The mainland is currently in the process of improvement, the quality of living is rising in China every day, and I too, wish for the CPC to improve by 4x or 8x or as much as possible. Glad to see you agree that Taiwan should eventually be reunified with the mainland, no matter how long it takes to get there. "A regime change would definitely hep the cause." How? The collapse of the CPC would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in China, so how would such a catastrophic event like regime change help the cause?
    1
  14550.  @firmaith  Why is it that you think just because Zelenskyy is Jewish, that he is not supporting Nazis? As I've said, there were people who were Jewish and yet they collaborated with the Nazis during WWII, being Jewish doesn't mean he is immune from supporting Nazis.
    1
  14551.  @didiermontagnier6114  If you claim Taiwan is an independent country, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there something controlling Taiwan and preventing them from formally declaring independence and joining the UN like an independent country can?
    1
  14552.  @ritachong2992  The U.S military industrial complex is laughing all the way to the bank, as Biden pledges more lethal aid to Ukraine.
    1
  14553.  @didiermontagnier6114  "There is no US military presence on Taiwan or anywhere near it..." The USA has confirmed that there are at least 39 U.S military personnel stationed in Taiwan island. Active-duty deployments now include 29 Marines as well as two service members from the Army, three from the Navy and five from the Air Force, according to the Pentagon's Defense Manpower Data Center.
    1
  14554.  @firmaith  "Maybe 0.02 %...Although it is indeed possible that Zelensky is a Nazi. It’s incredibly unlikely." Now instead of using his Jewish heritage, you're resorting to "probability" to claim that it's "incredibly unlikely" instead. But the Azov Battalion is literally incorporated into the Ukrainian National Guard, so all the probabilities in the world don't change the fact that Zelenskyy literally allows Nazis in the Ukrainian National Guard.
    1
  14555.  @firmaith  Apart from the Nazis, Putin has also stated back in February that he wants a written assurance that NATO will not continue their expansion eastwards (i.e that Ukraine not be allowed to join NATO). In fact, many NATO members like France and Germany, were reluctant to admit Ukraine into NATO membership (citing Ukrainian government corruption concerns), yet they've refused to put that down in writing to reassure Putin. After realizing that his words have fallen on deaf ears for years, Putin finally decided to act.
    1
  14556.  @didiermontagnier6114  Taiwan's Air Defense Identification Zone literally extends into mainland China's territory. Furthermore, if you trace the flight path taken by the People's Liberation Army Airforce fights, they actually flew closer to the mainland than to Taiwan, if you measure the distance.
    1
  14557.  @firmaith  But those are just statistics and probability. They predict possibilities, but the fact remains that Zelensky made the Azov Battalion part of the Ukrainian National Guard, even though he is Jewish, so for all your statistics, it doesn't change the fact that Zelensky is supporting Nazis. All the statistics in the world don't change anything once something is confirmed.
    1
  14558.  @firmaith  Russia did not invade the Donbas. Putin had declared that Donetsk and Lugansk were independent republics, shortly before Russian forces rushed to the aid of those two republics, after the latter two endured 8 years of shelling from the Azov battalion stationed there.
    1
  14559.  @firmaith  Responding to your question about being attacked by a gang and a Nazi offers to help, what if the Nazi was the root cause of the conflict? That the gang was actually targeting the Nazi all along? That's the scenario between Russia and Ukraine today, and the reason for Putin's military operation.
    1
  14560. Government controls corporations in China. Corporations control the government in America.
    1
  14561. Look up the Map of International Waters and the South China Sea is clearly not international waters.
    1
  14562.  @CA50716  I am Chinese and proud of China and what it's become. Can't I engage in debate and argument to defend China's side? I use logic and cite sources where necessary, but thus far I've been met with endless insults and verbal abuse. Such people choose to attack me personally, instead of attacking my points, yet can't I point it out?
    1
  14563. Bullying? The Philippines coastguard shot dead a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng. Whereas which Filipino fisherman has been shot by the Chinese coastguard? Answer: None!
    1
  14564.  @alloomis1635  Yes, like Nancy Pelosi made deals with TSMC Chairman Mark Liu in order to enrich herself at the expense of the people of Taiwan.
    1
  14565.  Karen Xitler  Hong Kong is already freed from British Colonial Rule.
    1
  14566.  Karen Xitler  Hong Kong is already freed from Britain
    1
  14567.  Karen Xitler  Hong Kong is freed after returning to mainland China.
    1
  14568.  Karen Xitler  Hong Kong is already freed.
    1
  14569.  Karen Xitler  Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  14570. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  14571. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  14572. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  14573. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14574. 我觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  14575. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14576.  @perrychrispy1  That Uighur kid seems proud to speak Mandarin, and declare his homeland to be People's Republic of China, so what makes you think they are being tortured and held against their will?
    1
  14577.  @perrychrispy1  Of course, in every classroom there will always be those troublemakers. And if you disobey Chinese laws, then you will be punished under Chinese laws isn't it? Those Uighur people attending classes don't look like they are being tortured, instead China is imparting positive Chinese virtues like being studious and industrious to them.
    1
  14578.  @lethallizard963  Once again, I have never said that Uighurs are immigrants, and that my stance is that Uighurs are Chinese citizens. Where did I ever said Uighurs are immigrants in my posts on this thread?
    1
  14579.  @brandonandreas4659  I agree that Uighurs are not illegal immigrants and that they are Chinese citizens. And the OP statement said nothing about illegal immigration so what's your point?
    1
  14580.  @immortaltyrant2474  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, as well as African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Ghana, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Afghan War, Iraq War, Libyan War, Syrian War, etc, even in the 21st century. The USA is bombing those countries and enacting regime change by cutting off those country's "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Trump just narrowly avoided starting a fresh war with Iran recently.
    1
  14581.  @brandonandreas4659  said "US not giving their own citizens this kind of treatment" America has the world's largest prison incarceration rate, and its prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity, that US government sometimes releases convicts back onto the streets in order to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate Having such a huge prison population represents a significant drain in the country's resources in upkeep and maintenance. Even worst, many former convicts are unable to find proper employment and return to the life of crime and wound up behind bars again. At least in China, the schools are teaching Uighurs Mandarin Chinese (most spoken language in the world by number of speakers) and jobskills, so that they can graduate and become productive members of society, instead of being misguided by terrorism.
    1
  14582.  @brandonandreas4659  If you have committed a capital offense in China, then China observes capital punishment and you will be sentenced to death for your crimes. At least this frees up space in Chinese prisons and allows resources to be spent elsewhere (like on the economy) instead of being tied up in sustaining such a huge prison population like in the USA. Imagine how much American taxpayers money being put into upkeep of the world's largest prison population.
    1
  14583.  @lethallizard963  Have you seen the hellish conditions in US border detention camps? After separating parents from kids by deporting them, the kids are sent to detention centres. Source: globalnews.ca/news/5429194/trump-migrant-detention-rationale-experts/ The conditions at the station in Clint, Texas, included inadequate food, lack of medical care and older children trying to care for toddlers. In one case, attorneys said a two-year-old boy without a diaper was being watched by older kids. Several had the flu. Many were separated from extended family members like aunts and uncles who had brought them to the border; others were teenage moms with babies. There have also been deaths at the detention centres. Six children have died since last year after being detained by border agents. At least two are believed to have died of complications from the flu, including a 16-year-old who was left to sleep on a concrete bench inside a Border Patrol station. In contrast, the Uighur children in Chinese schools are each given their own beds, a classroom to study and learn and a spacious courtyard to play during free time. And it was revealed by journalists that both adults and children get the weekend off to return to their villages (which may be quite remote in Xinjiang) and be with their families, and will resume school activities after the weekend.
    1
  14584. +BayanTheOne How is Taiwan the rightful successor of the imperial China, not PRC? During Chinese Civil War, the communists were mostly poorly equipped, untrained peasants and had much fewer numbers, while the Nationalist Kuomintang had wealth, superior equipment and training, and superior numbers, yet the KMT lost the mainland to communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? This demonstrates gross incompetence on KMT's right to rule China.
    1
  14585. ジョーさん The people of Taiwan voted for KMT, because despite its authoritative policies, Taiwan actually grew rapidly and progressed economically under single-party KMT dictatorship. The new party, DPP, is still rather green and inexperienced, and not used to dealing the CCP in the mainland, whereas the battle-hardened, politically-experienced KMT has made many dealings with CCP and knows how to properly govern Taiwan's policies. This is why a democratic system simply doesn't work, because ordinary people who vote are usually just too fickle, emotional, or unable to take voting responsibly and aren't politically knowledgeable enough to make important decisions regarding the country's future. That's how Trump got elected, by preying on gullible American's feelings with false promises of making America great again. In my opinion, politics should be about doing what's right, not what's popular. Sometimes, what's popular may not be right, and what's right may not be popular. Democracy, at its most basic element, is about doing what's popular, not necessarily what's right.
    1
  14586. The issue is actually between North Korea, South Korea, and USA, not China. At the most, Beijing can only act as mediator to this dispute, and arrange for dialogue between both Koreas and USA. If Trump wants to claim credit for China's efforts, then why didn't Kim just approach Washington directly, instead of coming to Beijing?
    1
  14587. If your company support anti-gay protests, then homosexual customers will boycott your brand. If your company supports anti-semitism, then Jews will boycott your brand. So if your company support anti-China protests then naturally, Chinese will boycott your brand.
    1
  14588.  @Lassitudeman  You're literally fighting against China, by supporting Hong Kong separatism from the mainland. So Chinese customs will boycott your company label, just like Jews will boycott a company that promotes anti-semitism.
    1
  14589.  @Lassitudeman  The Hong Kong rioters (mostly youths) are destroying the city that their parents and grandparents worked hard to build, resorting to violence, arsonism, vandalism, hurling petrol bombs, breaking building windows, security cameras, traffic lights, and damaging HK MTR stations, setting shops on fire, and so on. If your company support these anti-China protests in Hong Kong, then Chinese will boycott your brand, plain and simple.
    1
  14590. Western countries have been polluting the Earth for 200-300 years, since the Industrial Revolution began in 1700s-1800s. Whereas China only recently industrialized in the past 50 years. In fact, studies have shown that the US is the largest historical emitter of CO2 to date.
    1
  14591.  @Merlinever  Are you saying that the U.S before, never colonized the Americas or imported slaves from Africa, caused genocide of Native Americans, occupy their lands even till today, and plundered their natural resources like gold?
    1
  14592.  @Merlinever  If slavery ceased to exist, then why are American prison laborers paid such low wages? And the occupation of American lands continues even till this day.
    1
  14593.  @killerbee8892  What has Genghis Khan even got to do with Merlinever's statement that the U.S today is not the U.S before?
    1
  14594.  @Merlinever  The prison wages is even lower than what plantation owners paid to their slaves, yet you're saying slavery ceased to exist? And the occupation of American lands continues even till this day.
    1
  14595.  @Merlinever  A report published by the American Civil Liberties Union in June 2022 found about 800,000 prisoners out of the 1.2 million in state and federal prisons are forced to work, generating a conservative estimate of $11bn annually in goods and services while average wages range from 13 cents to 52 cents per hour. Five states – Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi and Texas – force prisoners to work without pay. The report concluded that the labor conditions of US prisoners violate fundamental human rights to life and dignity. ... (Source: ‘Slavery by any name is wrong’: the push to end forced labor in prisons"_ - 27 Sept 2022 The Guardian)
    1
  14596.  @Merlinever  "And what exactly do you mean by "American lands"?" Basically all of North America and South America. Their lands are still being occupied even till this day.
    1
  14597.  @anonp2958  If you want to talk about prison populations, then it's actually America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons.
    1
  14598. Seems like America is only interested in how much they can make use of your country to contain China's rise,
    1
  14599. Western countries have been polluting the Earth since 200-300 years ago, back when the Industrial Revolution began. China in comparison, only industrialized in the last 40 years or so.
    1
  14600. Anthony Stewart Since everyone have a right to an opinion like you said, then why can't aweebunny have his own post?
    1
  14601. The British eat RABBIT stew too. What is wrong with that? Really?
    1
  14602.  @fazole  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" ROC, China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Chairman Mao, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  14603.  @709zzy  "Maybe they could simply claim the soil " Trump: Rare earth? Pfft! I shall claim common earth instead, since its far less rare!
    1
  14604. "The empire, long divided, must unite."
    1
  14605.  @sunnyinmilkyway2114  No, it's the Westerners who want to divide China by targeting Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong. Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China.Xinjiang was part of China since Han Dynasty (200 BC) and it was known as Xiyu (西域). Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  14606. @Chishio Chishio You're saying that he works for the Chinese government, but Cyrus' message is about peaceful cooperation between the US and China, then isn't this a positive message for the world? Would you prefer to listen the warmongering messages from the West?
    1
  14607. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14608. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14609. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14610. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14611. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14612. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14613.  @Carbuncle0168  I can speak both English and Chinese, yet what makes you think I'm working for a meager 50¢ per post? Why not attempt to address my points rather resorting to insults against me for my views?
    1
  14614. Chinese workers manufacture cheap goods like smartphones, computers, appliances, electronics, sneakers, clothing, etc so that inflation in America is kept to a minimum and the cost of living in America is lower than it should be. Think of the millions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on finer or important things like cars, houses, school fees, college tuition, getting married, etc.
    1
  14615.  @stephenstrange4239  During the 19th century, Britain was a colonial superpower. By the 20th century, the U.S overtook Britain to become the world's superpower. But before that, from 1-1800 AD, it was actually China (and India) who was an economic power that made up around 23% of the world's share of GDP (according to Angus Maddison). Given that at the height of China's naval might during Zheng He's voyages, China did not found any overseas Chinese colonies, why do you presume that China will eventually follow in the U.S footsteps of imperialism sooner or later?
    1
  14616.  @stephenstrange4239  I'm saying that even at the height of China's naval might during Ming Dynasty and Zheng He's expeditions, China still did not found overseas colonies, then what makes you presume China will follow the Western Imperialism? China's history literally speaks for itself here.
    1
  14617.  @stephenstrange4239  You said: "historically, large countries did not get into colonization.also might be that older cultures that were still vibrant didnt colonize" Precisely my point. China was a large country with old culture and didn't colonize, so what makes you think China will start colonizing like the smaller countries like England, Belgium etc did? You said: "but Tibet needs freedom or China still dsnt have the moral highground on this." Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, back when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China, and Genghis Khan incorporated those territories into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during the Qing Dynasty. Just look up maps of Yuan and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was historically part of China, so why should we give up our ancestral lands? Because you say so?
    1
  14618.  @stephenstrange4239  Well, isn't India currently eyeing the Pakistan territory of Kashmir (of which they call "Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir" all the time)? If India can claim Goa, Manipur, Nagaland, Sikkim and Kashmir for historical reasons, then can't China claim Tibet for the same historical reason? Why should China give up our ancestral land of Tibet just because you say so?
    1
  14619.  @stephenstrange4239  The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (in Chinese: 中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议; in Tibetan: བོད་ཞི་བས་བཅིངས་འགྲོལ་འབྱུང་ཐབས་སྐོར་གྱི་གྲོས་མཐུན་དོན་ཚན་བཅུ་བདུན་) affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging that Tibet is part of China, then why should China give up our ancestral land of Tibet? Because you say so?
    1
  14620. Are you sure the world isn't laughing with apprehension at the possibility of WW3?
    1
  14621.  @fhrjrfbffhjdbffkekdkfnn  Agreed. People often claim you have "freedom of speech" in America, but the anti-China atmosphere in the U.S has festered so much, such that saying positive things about China might net you the term "communist party shill" by some. I hope Cyrus and his family remains safe, and that the anti-China attitudes online by Americans don't translate to actual physical violence on the ground, against people with differing views.
    1
  14622.  @cryptonite2806  You said: "But here we fight when attacked" Yes, Western countries would fight Russia to the last Ukrainian, since it's not your own soldiers fighting Russia. By now it's apparent that NATO and USA have made it clear that for all their talk and cheerleading, they aren't going to send troops to defend Ukraine and neither are they going to impose a No-Fly Zone over Ukraine. Ukraine's application to join NATO is unlikely to be successful, since it would mean NATO is obliged to send reinforcements to defend Ukraine if it were a member, so how is Ukraine going to get out of this mess? By refusing to surrender, Zelenskyy is only prolonging the war to maximise casualties. By releasing prisoners and arming civilians with rifles and rocket launchers, Zelenskyy is trying to cause chaos and maximise the civilian casualties. By removing the age restrictions for conscription, Zelenskyy is effectively enlisting child soldiers to fight and die for his refusal to surrender.
    1
  14623.  @katong1953  UT censorship is the worst. Perhaps you should have wrote: The US is led by a parade of 🤡.
    1
  14624.  @katong1953  US is led by a parade of 🤡.
    1
  14625. I watched Oliver Stone's 2019 documentary, Revealing Ukraine and he interviewed Medvedchuk and it turns out that Putin is godfather to his children. He's a politician no doubt, but he seems to really care about his country and what Western powers did to plunder Ukraine of its resources.
    1
  14626. Biden hasn't uttered a single word regarding Meng's arrest, it's like USA doesn't care what happens to Meng, nor does USA seem interested in the stalemate that it's ally Canada has with the Huawei CFO arrest.
    1
  14627. Agreed. Seems like Western countries are blaming China for fixing internal problems that some Western countries face domestically themselves and are unable to fix.
    1
  14628.  @geoeconomics5629  "Shenzhou. Wrong answer Do you know what they do in Pentagon ?" They themselves don't even know what they are doing! Nor can they make long term plans. Tell me, who's going to be the American President this November? How to make a 10 year plan for America, when their Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years?
    1
  14629.  Dark of the knight  Which part of our vast country of China did you visit? Which wet market you went to that sold sicked pork? Did you try to buy pork at discount prices?
    1
  14630.  @UltraGamer9999999999  So when I quote expert, you just either blame my sources as biased or fake news? Dr Peter Forster, a geneticist Cambridge University has identified 3 Covid-19 strains (A, B, C) Type-A is believed to have leaped from bats to humans (animal-to-human transmission) and Type-B is mutated from Type-A and found predominantly in China while Type-C is mutated from Type-B and found predominantly outside China, in places like Singapore. Video: No proof that Covid-19 originated in Wuhan: Peter Forster youtu.be/AQQf2yoymu0 The interesting thing is that the Europe and America suffer predominantly from Type-A virus (animal-to-human transmission) and Type-A is predominantly found outside East Asia, in Europeans and Americans. So could it be possible that Americans brought the Type-A (animal-to-human) strain to Wuhan?
    1
  14631. Soviet Union launched world's first satellite, put the first man into orbit, launched the world's first space station and numerous other space achievements. USA put a man on the moon, therefore they "won" the space race?
    1
  14632. Chinese people manufacture cheap products like smartphones, computers, electronics, so that the cost of living in other countries is kept lower than it should be. Think of the millions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses, thanks to Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on finer things like cars, houses, getting married, college tuition, etc.
    1
  14633. Kirk Crawford You think Americans are much better off making these items in America? Are American workers themselves willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers? If not, then the cost of living in America is going to increase due to higher American wages.
    1
  14634. Hosea Hernandez During his campaign, Donald Trump wanted to label China as currency manipulators, but after meeting with President Xi in Maralargo, he changed his mind completely. "They're not currency manipulators," President Trump told The Wall Street Journal during a 2017 press conference in the Oval Office, and then went on to explain how Beijing hasn't been manipulating the yuan for months.
    1
  14635. +Over Infinity Why are you accusing me of being 50 cent army? When did I even mention the Communist Party of China here in this comment thread?
    1
  14636. +Barindra Bal India can't even handle Pakistan on its own, and Pakistan will willing go to war with India for China's sake.
    1
  14637.  @brianlove8413  "神州 Shenzhou Sure mindsets don't change quickly," So if you agree with my statement (that mindsets are difficult to change), then why'd you claimed that my statement is untrue?
    1
  14638.  @stunningandbrave2520  "To say such a thing, are you referring to Han.. or??" Mainland China actually grants special privileges to ethnic minorities like Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchu, etc over Han. Those ethnic minorities in China enjoy priority in healthcare, free education for up to 15 years (9 years for Han), tax exemption, government bursaries, and so on.
    1
  14639. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  14640. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14641. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  14642. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms whereas Chinese President Xi Jinping is only entering his 3rd term.
    1
  14643. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  14644. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  14645. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  14646. So you're implying that Hong Kong can enact "draconian" laws as long as they declare a state of emergency in Hong Kong?
    1
  14647.  @michaeljames2349  You said: "Russia is supposed to be the second most powerful military in the world and they can’t even take Ukraine." Do you have any idea how big Ukraine is? It is the second-largest European country after Russia, yet Russia has already incorporated the 4 oblasts of Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia. Not bad for the world's second most powerful military. Meanwhile, the world's most powerful military lost the Afghan War to a bunch of insurgents after nearly 20 years and pouring trillions of dollars in aid to Afghanistan. Also, the world's most powerful navy is unable to protect ships passing through the Red Sea, instead the vessels are forced to make a huge detour. (Except for Russian and Chinese ships who are granted safe passage through the Red Sea) "Also don’t blame Ukraine for attacking Russian positions after being attacked." No, I'm blaming them for the indiscriminate targeting and killing of Russian civilians in the border town of Belgorod.
    1
  14648. @kjnljlljj High-tech, but can the users operate them? Javelin anti-tank missile systems to Ukraine are not effective due to the complete lack of technical support, and the Ukrainian soldiers make use of Google Translate to read instructions.
    1
  14649. Which of the above types of people are you?
    1
  14650. Russia withdrawing its troops won't end the conflict, it would be the Minsk Accords all over again, with the West simply buying more time to rearm Ukraine.
    1
  14651. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  14652. What genocide are you talking about? Isn't China currently the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people?
    1
  14653.  @travisconfer2255  The population of Uighurs in China has nearly quadrupled in size from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in China aren't subject to the One China policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Here's a graph illustrating this. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group censuses (1953–2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 ... Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China So what genocide of Uighurs are you talking about, when the population of Uighurs in China actually grew?
    1
  14654.  @travisconfer2255  I've just shown that the population of Uighurs in China nearly quadrupled from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020, yet you can't refute my point, so you hurl accusations against me for my views?
    1
  14655.  @travisconfer2255  "神州 Shenzhou you're either naive because you live in china and do t see what's really going on" Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself? The Communist Party of China has transformed China from a previously dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's fatory (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western MSM constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  14656.  @travisconfer2255  "神州 Shenzhou you're either naive because you live in china and do t see what's really going on" Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  14657.  @travisconfer2255  "神州 Shenzhou what are you a CCP member? because there is proof" Where's the proof? Even the International Criminal Court (ICC) is expected to rule there is insufficient evidence against China and has asked for more evidence before it will be willing to open an investigation into such claims.
    1
  14658.  @travisconfer2255  "神州 Shenzhou what are you a CCP member? because there is proof" Even the ICC is expected to rule that there is insufficient evidence against China, and it has asked for more evidence before it will be willing to open an investigation into such claims.
    1
  14659.  @travisconfer2255  You said: "or you know and are supportive and that would make you just as evil" A long-term survey by Harvard University and Ash Center has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. So are you saying that 80-90% of Chinese that support the government are in your words, "evil"?
    1
  14660. Peng Shuai wants to keep a low profile, that's why she's been avoiding the public eye for weeks. She has appeared in IOC video call, expressing her desire for personal privacy, but the WTA is demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see, instead of respecting her wish for privacy.
    1
  14661. Georgia's President (who was born in France) has refused to recognize the election result, and says she will not be stepping down from her position at the end of her term. And she says she's doing it all in the name of "democracy."
    1
  14662.  @paulbaskerville2748  Chinese media censors the news about People's Liberation Army soldiers (if any) that supposedly died at the border with India, because China is focusing on de-escalation of conflict, while Indian media is doing the opposite. The Indian Media treat the Indian Army soldiers that died (mostly to succumbing to freezing temperatures and high attitudes at Ladakh) as martyrs, and this stir up anti-China sentiment among Indian nationalists, resulting in boycotting Chinese goods as well as thrashing and burning of Chinese goods (which only hurts India). So that's the advantage of censorship in China, the government did not release the number of PLA soldiers killed (if any, and the families can hold private funerals without attracting too much attention) whereas the Indian media treat the Indian Army soldier's death as martyrs and stoke the Indian nationalist sentiments against China and Chinese. Whereas many Chinese remain neutral towards India, instead of harboring hate for the deaths (if any) of PLA soldiers.
    1
  14663.  @paulbaskerville2748  In India, the Indian media frame the Indian soldiers that perished at the border as martyrs (even though they succumbed to high attitudes and freezing temperatures) and this stokes the anti-China sentiment among Indian nationalists, resulting in boycotting Chinese goods and burning Made-in-China products, then how on Earth is this a good thing for China-Indian relations? The problem with "bottled-up anger" is that it can be directed at targets that aren't the cause of such anger. The people could have bottled up anger because of unhappiness with their standards of living and their government's inability to address their problems, so they take out their frustrations on China and Chinese people. The government may also use this opportunity to redirect blame away from their failures onto a convenient scapegoat. So why should China follow India? A war between China and India does not benefit either side and it will be to the USA's benefit if both China and India start fighting each other. So China's aim is de-escalation of conflict and this means censorship of news of PLA troops that died at the border (if any). Can you imagine how Chinese nationalists will react if they learn of PLA soldiers dying at the border (if any)? There would be a rise in anti-Indian sentiment among Chinese if China releases the death toll of troops (if any) at the border, so it's thanks to censorship that many Chinese aren't as anti-Indian as they could be.
    1
  14664.  @paulbaskerville2748  "神州 Shenzhou I am surprised with all the problems the ccp have that they haven't ." Again, it's because releasing the news of PLA soldiers that died (if any) at the border would only inflame anti-India sentiment among Chinese nationalists (like how Indian media is stoking anti-China sentiment among Indian nationalists) that's why China is censoring such news (if any) in order to de-escalate the conflict. Because if both sides continually escalate the conflict, it could potentially start a real hot war between China and India, which is to our countries detriment, and it's in the U.S interests. You said: "Already locked down city's people are starving soon China will be in full famine . all ready people are in the dark and freezing in there homes and no way to cook .mass uninployment and government workers can't buy food and pay rent having to Borow money to pay the claw back"" China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export to other countries. China literally ranks first in agricultural production, believe me if China is starving then the first sign is that countries all over the world stop receiving agricultural produce from China. As for the power shortage, that only lasted a couple of weeks at the most, now power has been restored to homes all over Northern China, and people have moved on to other more important issues, yet you are still "left in the dark" (pun intended)? It just sounds like all the news you get about China is only negative in nature that's all, it's as though you want China to fail and not succeed with a different political systems from yours that's all.
    1
  14665.  @paulbaskerville2748  Do those people who lived in Hong Kong and now in Taiwan have a WeChat account? Otherwise what makes you think that people in the mainland can't get a hold of people in Hong Kong or Taiwan? Xi'an is under lockdown yes, but city officials are securing food and groceries for residents. Video: China's Xi'an ensures food supply amid COVID-19 resurgence youtu.be/6qrCS0gJaTo And what sexual misconduct and kidnapped and rape are you talking about? You just jump from topic to topic without any reasoning just to discredit China that's all.
    1
  14666.  @paulbaskerville2748  In China, if the light bulb still works (and is shining brightly in fact) then why is there a need to change the light bulb? Why fix what isn't broken? Look at the United States for example, they can change the light bulb every 4 years, but the light bulbs are faulty and don't work, then what's the point of such a system of changing the light bulb? China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US short term leadership.
    1
  14667.  @paulbaskerville2748  "神州 Shenzhou a few truck loads mostly meat next to no vegetables and only enough for 1/4 of the people at least it is beter than earlier this year delivery in dump trucks that they halled the body's away in and it was not raped ." Maybe it's because the residents in Xi'an can still go out and shop for groceries themselves, so not many delivery trucks are needed? Video: How do residents in Xi'an go grocery shopping during COVID-19 lockdown? https://youtu.be/0MYEsLY0D9M And you talk about delivery in dump trucks that they halled the bodies away in, where did you over hear this piece of news from? How do dump trucks have enough capacity to deliver groceries and take away bodies? Why not just use a normal truck? You make this vehemently anti-China allegations against China, but look at the New York using refrigerator trucks to store dead bodies from Covid-19, and that's the real tragedy here. Video: Bodies of Covid-19 victims in New York stored in refrigerated trucks months after death https://youtu.be/sKSC8m4eQ5o
    1
  14668.  @paulbaskerville2748  You said: "The girl tennis player. That interview was totally staged ." The girl tennis player as in Peng Shuai? I've read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and she has had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several years in fact. But where are the allegations of sexual assault in her post? Could you point out where in her post did she say she was raped? Peng Shuai had written an email to Steve Simon of WTA which stated that she was resting at home and that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent. You said that the interviewer was totally staged, but do you have evidence that it was staged? Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there's an ongoing anti-corruption campaign to crackdown on the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But when is the last time a country like USA had an anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign, but after he became president, no further action has been taken against Clinton for corruption. As for fentanyl, China has been arresting drug smugglers. A court in northern China sentenced a fentanyl trafficker to death and eight others to jail on November 7. It was the first big joint fentanyl bust between China and the United States.The nine were sentenced after pleading guilty to manufacturing and smuggling the opioid to the US in a public trial in Hebei province. Video: Fentanyl trafficker in China sentenced to death https://youtu.be/DrABhGDoJJ8 The hero doctor as in Li Wenliang? Dr Li's post was on 30th Dec 2019 but the next day, China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. So it's only a difference of 1 day that's all.
    1
  14669.  @paulbaskerville2748  Again what evidence of delivering groceries and hauling bodies away in dump trucks are you talking about? Why not just use ordinary transport trucks instead of garbage disposal trucks? If anything, I've shown New York using refrigerator trucks to store bodies, but you got not evidence of your claims. And what food at astronomical prices beyond the reach of ordinary people are you talking about? There's a adequate food supply in Xi'an. video:youtu.be/6qrCS0gJaTo
    1
  14670.  @paulbaskerville2748  I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and it turns out that she consented to sex. Peng Shuai wrote: "Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well." So where are the allegations of sexual assault in Peng Shuai's post?
    1
  14671.  @paulbaskerville2748  "神州 Shenzhou wach the video how many women walk around shopping centers with two body gards that they are scared of" I watched Singaporean newspaper, Lianhe Zaobao interview Peng Shuai (video:youtu.be/ZF9Owb9uSOE ) during at an International Ski Federation cross-country skiing event in Shanghai where she once again denied that she had made any accusations, saying in Mandarin "I have never said or written that anyone has sexually assaulted me, I have to clearly stress this point", and that there had been misunderstandings about her post on Weibo.
    1
  14672.  @paulbaskerville2748  What tall body guards? In that Singaporean Newspaper Lianhe Zaobao interview with Peng Shuai in Shanghai that was former NBA player Yao Ming walking, so what tall body guard are you talking about? And if you read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) it says that she consented to sex and there are no allegations of sexual assault in her post. On 17th November, Peng Shuai wrote an email to Steve Simon of WTA, which stated that she was resting at home and that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    1
  14673.  @paulbaskerville2748  "神州 Shenzhou nice try even the chineas people don't trust the chineas government." Actually, according to a long-term study by Harvard University and Ash Center, it has been revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. And Peng Shuai has already told Singaporean Newspaper reporter that the allegations of sexual assault were false, and even if you read her post, she consented to sex and there was no allegation (you're welcome to point out where in her post did she say she was raped).
    1
  14674.  @paulbaskerville2748  "神州 Shenzhou when u hold a gun to someone head and ask them a question they will say what ever u want ." So do you have evidence that a gun was held to her head? Or to people's head while they take the survey? Then why are you jumping to conclusions without proof? You said: "With women lib black lives matters woke and the me to movements going to fare and destroying and dividing the west and helping in its destruction. China playes its part by killing kids by dumping fentanyl in to the west . " Those movements are of YOUR OWN DOING, how is China to blame for the divisions in the West today? You believe in "freedom of speech" well that's what you get. The West is suffering from overinflated rights and diminished responsibility of taking responsibility for what's being said. The rights of feminists conflict with the rights of misogynists. The rights of LGBT conflict with the rights of the homophobic. The rights of ethnic-minorities versus the rights of the ethnic-majority. Those who are pro abortion versus those who are against abortion. Pro-Vaccine versus Anti-Vaxxers. The Left Wing versus the Right Wing. All these movements are tearing apart the fabric of American society from within, that's what happens when you have an unregulated media, yet you're somehow blaming China and fentanyl for your woes? You said: "I live simply have 5 to 10 of everything I want or nead" Not every American or Westerner is as lucky as you, many people have been plunged into poverty because of the pandemic, yet U.S strategy is to save businesses over saving lives. Where's China's approach is to save lives over saving businesses. You said: "As long as the ccp dumps propaganda and lies to the west I will do my part to correct them ." What correction have you done? I have refuted your points by quoting articles, but what have you cited to support your arguments? You said: "Hopefully she will have a better fate then the hero doctor that tried to warn the world" Dr Li post was on 30th Dec 2019 and the next day, China had reported a mysterious pneumonia-like illness to the WHO on 31st Dec 2019, so it's just a difference of 1 day isn't it? Also, if you read Dr Li's post he didn't want to spread the information, he wrote : "Don't circulate the information outside of this group, tell your family and loved ones to take precautions" (大家不要外传，让家人亲人注意防范) but someone took screenshot of his post and uploaded it to Chinese social media.
    1
  14675.  @paulbaskerville2748  "神州 Shenzhou this is all cut and paste from other ccp propaganda people. I didn't see the gun but body language and she checked with the two body guards when she was speaking." So you have no evidence of a gun being pointed at her? Then it's just your own speculation without proof that's all. Are you a body language expert? Otherwise you literally have no proof that she's being forced in any way, except for your own speculation that's all. I mean, how do you even prove that those two tall people are her bodyguards? According to the interview that Singapore newspaper Lianhe Zaobao (video:youtu.be/ZF9Owb9uSOE ) the tall person is former NBA player Yao Ming, so what bodyguards are you talking about?
    1
  14676.  @paulbaskerville2748  "U say the power plants are all up and running look at the satellite view of last year and this year China is a lot darker ."_ NASA's satellite view of China is dimmer last year (2020) because of Covd-19, but where's the data that it's same in 2021? But despite the dimmer lights, China was actually the only major economy in 2020 to see positive economic growth, whereas all other major economies contracted during 2020. You said: "The ccp no matter what u say are pure evil and all the properganda u try and fake stuff u try u want proof u can't recognize it .evin the chineas people don't trust the ccp government and are hesitant to get the shot." China has vaccinated 82.5% of our population of 1.41 billion against COVID-19 so what hesitancy to get the shot are you talking about? You just shoot off your mouth without proof that's all and you can't even back up your claims with actual evidence. You said: " .so have a nice bat sandwich and some stolen fish and as the kids say eat poop" Now you're just making racial remarks against Chinese people's eating habits that's all, you've revealed your true colors that's all, that you're racist against Chinese.
    1
  14677.  @paulbaskerville2748  "神州 Shenzhou China doesn't come head on they use there fisherman the militia as there attack dogs." So now you're against Chinese fishermen and labelling them as dogs? Look at Phillipines coastguard Maritime Control Surveillance 3001 shooting to death a 65-year old fisherman Hong Shi-cheng (洪石成). But which Philippines fishing vessel been shot to death by Chinese coastguard? None! You said: "attacking countries waters invading countries waters stealing fish. now countries sink them by the thousands." Stealing fish? Fish is not the property of any country then how can you accuse Chinese fishermen of stealing fish? Those fishing grounds in the South China Seas have been the traditional fishing grounds of Chinese fishermen for centuries, why should our fishermen give up their ancestral fishing grounds? You said: "the ccp are like bad aliens that say we come in piece then eat u and then kill u." You said Chinese fishermen and you previously made racist remarks about Chinese eating habits then you're just demonising China and our people that's all, so you're blatantly anti-China.
    1
  14678.  @paulbaskerville2748  "神州 Shenzhou it might be because of the Olympics the blue sky . the ccp stops manufacturing while they are on so the world dousent see all the normal smog and pollution." China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/j3J196bLP5E
    1
  14679.  @paulbaskerville2748  Why'd did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in the first place? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lose the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates the KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, and cements the Communists right to rule China. And speaking of claiming waters, it was Republic of China 🇹🇼 that published the 11 Dash Line claim to the South China Sea Islands back in 1947. The People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 removed two dashs and this resulted in the 9 Dash Line, but the ROC continued to claim 11 Dash Line so aren't they the claiming more territorial waters here?
    1
  14680.  @paulbaskerville2748  Who says that fish is property of whomsoever? Fish is fish, if the fish swim from Indian Ocean to South China Sea, then how can you accuse fisherman of stealing fish? There's no such law against stealing fish, you're just making up laws to accuse China of crimes that don't exist! Show me which law in the world says that fish is property of XYZ country? There's no such law! Also, the bat soup coronavirus origins have long been debunked by experts, it turns out that the bat eating videos were filmed in Panau, an island close to Indonesia, so why are you making racist remarks against Chinese eating habits? If you want Chinese to expand our diet then why are you against Chinese fishermen expanding their fishing grounds?
    1
  14681.  @paulbaskerville2748  When Imperial Japan invaded Manchuria, the Nationalist KMT Generalissimo Chiang kai-shek was reluctant to fight the Japanese, instead he continued purging communists (our fellow Chinese brethren) instead of meeting the invaders head on. Until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng had to kidnap Chiang and get him to ally with the communists against the Japanese. This incident was later known as the Xi'An Incident (西安事变) Video:_Xi'an Incident_ youtu.be/QDJMAJHySNs Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was thanks to Communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release. Chiang was initially opposed to negotiating with a Communist delegate, but withdrew his opposition when it became apparent that his life and freedom were largely dependent on Communist goodwill towards him. Only then did the KMT and the Communists unify to fight the Japanese invaders.
    1
  14682.  @paulbaskerville2748  The bat soup coronavirus origins have already been debunked as having been filmed in wet markets outside of China, in Panau Island near to Indonesia. Experts from World Health Organization arrived in Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market and their findings indicate that Covid-19 entered the market from elsewhere, and they also visited the Wuhan Institute of Virology and all but dismissed the lab leak theory as "highly unlikely". And you constantly make racist comments about Chinese eating habits, but when Chinese people turn to fish and our fisherman expand their fishing grounds, you complain because you're just anti-China that's all. Again, 8where's the law that says fish is property of some country? Fish is fish, there is no laws against stealing fish in the sea, you're just trying to accuse China of committing crimes that don't even exist. I mean, it's clear that you're against Chinese people's eating habits, Chinese fishermen, Communist Party of China, and so you're just anti-China that's all.
    1
  14683.  @paulbaskerville2748  Rewrite history? China claimed the South China Sea back when the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) published the 11 Dash Line back in 1947. Even after ROC retreat to Taiwan, they still maintain the 11 Dash Line claim even till today, whereas the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 removed two dashes and that's why we have the 9 Dash Line claim. Yet you support ROC 🇹🇼 11 Dash Line but not PRC 🇨🇳 9 Dash Line just shows your biased double standards that's all. Another thing about the Nationalist KMT losing to a bunch of communist peasants, let's look at the period after Japan's WWII surrender. After the 1945 Japanese surrender, the KMT had a strength of 2 million (regular), 2.3 million (militia) (June 1946). Whereas the Communists had a strength of 1.2 million (regular) 2.6 million (militia) (July 1945) after the Japanese surrender. So in total, the KMT still outnumbered the communists and yet they still lost the mainland and had to flee to Taiwan? And mind you, this was after 1945, so there was no more fighting the Japanese.
    1
  14684.  @paulbaskerville2748  "神州 Shenzhou the wto is corrupt and in the pockets of the ccp" Are we talking about the World Health Organization (WHO) or the World Trade Organisation (WTO)? Where's your evidence of corruption? In fact, the United States is the biggest contributor to WHO, having contributed $893 million compared to China's $86 million during the same period. So since the USA contributes 10 times more money to the WHO than China, then if anything, it sounds like WHO would be in the US pocket instead of China's pocket. And again, where's the law that says fish in the seas are the property of any country? Fish is fish and there is no laws against stealing fish in the seas, so why are you accusing China of a crime that doesn't exist?
    1
  14685.  @paulbaskerville2748  "神州 Shenzhou u stuck and lies don't prove any thing the Un denied china's clames to the 9 dash line and found in favor of the Philippines." Where did the United Nations ever denied China's claims to the 9 Dash Line? The United Nations has clarified its relationship with the tribunal in The Hague that gave its verdict on the South China Sea Arbitration. The UN issued a statement on the Chinese micro-blogging platform Weibo, as well as its official website, saying that its principle judicial organ, the International Court of Justice, has had no involvement in the case. Video: UN: Arbitration tribunal not a UN organ youtu.be/eYHsMVrfUx8 So why are you claiming that the UN denied China's claims in the South China Sea? And you constantly mock China, Chinese people's eating habits, Chinese fishermen and so on, all the while praising Taiwan, but Taiwan also oppose the tribunal ruling that ruled in favor of the Philippines, because Taiwan ROC 🇹🇼 maintains their 11 Dash Line claim over the South China Seas.
    1
  14686.  @paulbaskerville2748  I cite evidence to support my arguments, but you just run your mouth off without proof. I've shown that UN clarified that it's not related to the tribunal, the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) only shares the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice (ICJ), but the two organisations are not related. The PCA isn't even an official UN agency unlike the ICJ. And you said that the WHO is corrupt and in China's pocket but where's your proof? The fact remains that the USA contributes 10 times more money to WHO than China (USA's $893 million versus China's $86 million) so if anything, it sounds like WHO would be in the US pocket, not China's.
    1
  14687.  @paulbaskerville2748  "神州 Shenzhou yes the Hage." I'm still waiting for you to quote me evidence that the UN denies China's 9 Dash Line claims. The arbitration tribunal in the Hague that did the verdict on the South China Sea is the Permanent Court of Arbitration which is not an official UN agency unlike the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The PCA only shares the same office space in the Hague as the ICJ, but the two organisations are not related. The Permanent Court of Arbitration rents space in the same building as the UN’s International Court of Justice, but the two organisations are not related Source: SCMP: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal Since the arbitration was conducted by a non-official UN agency, then China reserves the right not to adhere to it's decision. Also, you claimed the WHO (or WTO, which is it?) is corrupt, but the United States contributes 10x more money to WHO than China. USA contributes $893 million to WHO compared to China's $86 million in the same period, so if anything, shouldn't the WHO be in the USA's pocket, not China's?
    1
  14688.  @paulbaskerville2748  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, the USA appears to be threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  14689.  @paulbaskerville2748  Let's get this straight, you don't care nuts about China, our people nor our government. You constantly mock Chinese people's eating habits, but when Chinese try to diversify through fishermen expanding their fishing grounds, you complained about Chinese fishermen being thieves. But there's no law that says fish are property of any one country in the seas, yet you're accusing Chinese fishermen of a crime that does not exist. Otherwise, you're welcome to show me which laws say that fish in the sea belong to any one country. I've noticed that you don't even bother to refer to Peng Shuai or Dr Li by name, you just call them tennis player and hero doctor, because you can't be bothered to remember Chinese names, so you're just blatantly anti-China that's all. Over 70 years ago, nobody expected "communist" China to succeed. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and look at how far China has come under the leadership of the Communist Party of China. China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. Then is there really a need for China to abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Our system clearly works for our country.
    1
  14690.  @paulbaskerville2748  "神州 Shenzhou the Hage found favor of the Philippines. the ccp has poised the Un and the who" The Hague is home to many tribunals and courts, but the arbitration tribunal that did the verdict on the South China Sea is the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which is a non-UN intergovernmental organization, unlike the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The PCA only shares the same office space in the Hague as the ICJ, but the two organisations are not related. You keep complaining about People's Republic of China's 🇨🇳 9 Dash Line, but again that was based on Republic of China 🇹🇼 11 Dash Line which retreated to Taiwan Island, even they reject the arbitration tribunal's ruling on the South China Sea. Video: Taiwan Rejects South China Sea Ruling on Itu Aba https://youtu.be/z0sKML5KRx0 Also, why'd did the ROC 🇹🇼 even lose the mainland to the PRC 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? The Nationalist KMT had massive wealth, superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet despite all these advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? And I'm still waiting for your evidence that the Communist Party of China has poisoned the WHO (and now the UN?) The United States is the largest contributor to the WHO so if anything, shouldn't the WHO be in the U.S's pockets instead of China's?
    1
  14691.  @paulbaskerville2748  Russian President Putin actually had positive words to say about China. He said China is the largest trade partner for Russia, despite the decline in global economy, the trade turnover is increasing between Russia and China, setting a record. He also said China is a highly reliable for Russia, not just politically, but also strategically as well and China is delivering on all undertaken commitments Video: President Putin on Taiwan: 'China does not need to use force' https://youtu.be/M82E3WYjXgk And again, China has arrested and sentence fentanyl trafficker to death, but again you're just disregarding anything good that China does
    1
  14692.  @paulbaskerville2748  China making infrastructures is much better than USA making war. Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China https://youtu.be/TtduKDpy4oc China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  14693.  @paulbaskerville2748  "神州 Shenzhou what the usa doesn't understand is some countries Have to have a strong leadership that is brutal on any desent. Like in the case of the talaban the infighting and dividing in to religious sects ." Yes, that's how the Taliban in Afghanistan governs, through various tribes and factions and possibly with a chief to mediate feuds and act as a unifying figure. The point is that the U.S democratic experiment has failed in Afghanistan, after nearly 20 years and pouring trillions of dollars into the Afghan war effort. The U.S tried to force democracy but in the end, all their democratic institutions in Afghanistan collapsed like a house of cards. The democratically elected Afghan President Ghani fled the country with carloads of U.S cash (because of corruption) and the 300,000-men strong Afghan Army had surrendered to the Taliban in weeks with barely any resistance on their part. If anything, this shows that you can't force democracy onto countries and expect it to succeed. So when it comes to China, China has found a political system that works for our country then is there really a need to abandon this system and adopt a Western-style democracy? You said: "Even politicians on different sides like fish face and his side and xi with his backers even though they are the ccp Xi gose after fish fase side .but with the incompetent childish actions of Xi his supporters are supporting fish face side ." I don't understand why Westerners feel the need to insult politicians physical appearance when they aren't even your countries leaders. Yes, there are factions within the Communist Party of China, it consist of 90 million communist members (about the population size of Germany) after all. But once a decision is made by the party then the CPC presents a united front outside. And every communist member votes on each decision made. You said: "The usa is run by the rich and powerful they keep the people divided and controlled and poor killing the middle class by getting rid of good paying middle class jobs and replacing them with minimum wage jobs ." Yes, in the USA, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans. Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why American monopolies like Facebook, Google, Amazon, Apple, dominate their respective industries and either eliminated or bought out the competition from smaller American films, also stifling innovation through competition in the process. Whereas in China, the Chinese government controls the Chinese corporations for China's benefit, reining in companies when they strayed too far. For example, China has anti-monopoly law and is clamping down on anti-competitive practices by Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, to take these companies down a notch, freeing up market space so that smaller Chinese firms can emerge and compete with the bigger companies in innovative ways. You said: "Construction jobs still pay good but now housing prices are so high the young can never afford to buy one . A lot of young have given up like in China the laying flat movement is growing." This is a problem that the China needs to address. Regarding rising housing prices, President Xi Jinping said that "Housing is for living in, not for speculation" (房子是用来住的、不是用来炒的) it is believed that market speculations has causing housing prices to rise beyond the reach of young couples seeking to apply for a house, and I hope the government addresses this issue. You said: "I would like to see all countries working together to build a moon base and colonize Mars and Venice" China has previously sent people to space and even landed on the Moon. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIviKg4Mduw
    1
  14694.  @paulbaskerville2748  "神州 Shenzhou ware did you go I won" You did not post anymore comments after my last comment 2 days ago, then is there a need for me to respond? You said: "Stolen fishy fishy fishy" Again, there's no law indicating that fish are property of any one country, then how can a country steal fish? And I'm still waiting for you to quote United Nations denying China's 9 Dash Claim, because the Hague arbitration tribunal (Permanent Court of Arbitration) is a non-official UN agency it only rents space in the same building as the UN’s International Court of Justice. And you claim to support Taiwan island, well the Republic of China 🇹🇼 has the 11 Dash Line claim compared to the 9 Dash Line by the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and even Taiwan objects to the arbitration tribunal ruling. China Evergrande Group said in its Wechat account that 91.7% of its national projects have resumed construction after three months of effort. And President Xi Jinping's words regarding Evergrande is that "Homes are for living in, not for speculation!" what makes you claim that Xi stole the money?
    1
  14695.  @paulbaskerville2748  "神州 Shenzhou so if they are not pirates and stealing fish then why are hundreds of fishing boats from China being sunk by most countries in there waters . 800 to 1000 of them" You claim up to 1000 fishing boats from China are being sunk? Where do you get this info? Indonesia has been blowing up fishing vessels yes, but most of them are from Vietnam (142), the Philippines (76), Malaysia (49), but only 1 from China. https://youtu.be/Moenc22eFT8
    1
  14696.  @paulbaskerville2748  Evergrande has resumed construction of 63 projects in the southern Pearl River delta, spanning 15 sites from the city of Guangzhou to locations in Foshan, Qingyuan, Yangjiang and Zhaoqing, according to a subsidiary. You said: "Some of my coments are being deleted. Or not geting through." You're saying that YouTube is deleting your comments or they aren't getting through? That means that censorship does exist even on Western platforms like YouTube after all, then why'd you complain about censorship in China when every countries has censorship to a certain degree?
    1
  14697.  @paulbaskerville2748  神州 Shenzhou Argentina 300 USA 300 Taiwan 20 stuf like that Again, do you have evidence to substantiate your claims? Argentina sunk 1 Chinese fishing vessel, Lu Yu Yuan 10 squid fishing boat, but where are the hundreds of boats supposedly sunk?
    1
  14698.  @paulbaskerville2748  Also, I'm still waiting for you evidence that China has poisoned the UN and the WHO. The United States is the largest contributor to WHO, having contributed 10 times more money to WHO than China (US's $893 million vs China's $86 million) then if anything, it sounds like the WHO should be in the US pocket not China's. And the Permanent Court of Arbitration is not even an official UN agency, it only rents the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice, but the two organizations are unrelated. So where's your evidence that UN denies China's 9 Dash Line claim? And Taiwan Island's 11 Dash Line claim is even larger than the mainland's 9 Dash Line claims, even Taiwan rejected the arbitration tribunal's ruling.
    1
  14699.  @paulbaskerville2748  First you complain about Chinese eating habits like eating bats (even though those batsoup videos were filmed in Panau, an Island near Indonesia, not in China). But when Chinese fishermen expand our food diversity and fishing grounds, you chastise Chinese fishermen. It's apparent that you're just anti-China that's all, no matter what. I've asked you for evidence to substantiate your claims, but you give nothing, only just spout more anti-China claims without proof.
    1
  14700.  @paulbaskerville2748  What language are you even speaking?
    1
  14701.  @paulbaskerville2748  Hey, we've talking for a while now and it's evident from your words that you're just anti-China that's all, you care absolutely nothing for China's interests, nor do you actually want China to succeed. But it's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set and many economists firmly believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's economy sometime in the foreseeable future, with estimates ranging from 2025 to 2028. That's why United States wants to demonise our country in order to "manufacture consent" for Western audiences to go to war with China.
    1
  14702.  @paulbaskerville2748  Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-corruption crackdowns to deal with the mountain of corruption within the communist party. Over one hundred officials of provincial-ministerial level and above have been implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China, which began after the 18th Party Congress in 2012. But when is the last time a country like the United States had an anti-corruption crackdown of it's own? Hilary Clinton is corrupt politician, and Donald trump promised to jail her during his presidential campaign. But after he became president, no further action has been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    1
  14703.  @paulbaskerville2748  The corruption had seeped into the Communist Party because of Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms in late 1970s. Previous Communist Party leaders like Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao let the corruption fester, but it was Xi Jinping that had the resolve to root out corruption in the party and China is better off for it. Over one hundred officials of provincial-ministerial level and above have been implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China, which began after the 18th Party Congress in 2012. Source: Wikipedia: Officials implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China (2012–2017)
    1
  14704.  @paulbaskerville2748  About humans going to the moon and colonizing Mars, China has even sent people in to space. On 15 October 2003, Yang Liwei (杨利伟) became the first person launched into space by China, on board the Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft, making China the third country in the world to independently send humans into space, after the USA and USSR. And again, what CPC coverup when China had reported to the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019? Dr Li's report was only 1 day earlier, on 30th Dec 2019, so what CPC coverup are you talking about?
    1
  14705.  @paulbaskerville2748  Xi'an officials who are deemed to have failed at controlling the virus in their region are regularly sacked or reprimanded. There is a sense of crisis among many government officials in Xi'an to meet the people's expectations, so again, how am I harmful to the Chinese people? The harmful one is you, mocking Chinese eating habits and complaining about Chinese fishermen expanding their fishing grounds, yet now you're suddenly concerned about food in Xi'an? You can go and dry your crocodile tears, because you don't truly care about Chinese people.
    1
  14706.  @paulbaskerville2748  Speaking of humans going to the Moon, in 2019, China became the first country to land on the Moon's far side (i.e the side of the Moon that always faces away from the Earth) through lunar lander Chang'e 4 (嫦娥四号) and lunar rover Yutu-2 (玉兔二号 "Jade Rabbit-2) . Other countries haven't attempted this because it's difficult to directly communicate with lunar rovers on the far side of the Moon, because communication needs direct line of sight. So China solve this problem by launching a relay satellite, Queqiao (鹊桥 "Magpie Bridge") to allow communications between the Earth and the lunar rover on the Moon's far side.
    1
  14707.  @paulbaskerville2748  "神州 Shenzhou that is good hopefully mankind will survive long enough to start working together instead of fighting" China want's to cooperate with the West on space, but did you know that China is forbidden from working together with NASA? Because of this, Chinese astronauts aren't even allowed on board the International Space Station. Why call this space station "International" when it is off limits to Chinese people (about a fifth of humanity)? I mean, space exploration should be for all mankind's benefit, yet China is being ostracized by others from participating in this important endeavor because of U.S policy? I mean, even the former Soviet-Union, Russian scientists and cosmonauts can work with NASA, but not Chinese scientists and taikonauts (Chinese astronauts)?
    1
  14708.  @paulbaskerville2748  Copying? China is literally the first country to land on the far side of the Moon through the use of a relay satellite, no other country has achieved this level of technological sophistication to land on the far side. And why call it "International" Space Station, when a fifth of humanity (i.e Chinese people) are barred from working on board the ISS? The West have no problems allowing Russian scientists and cosmonauts on board the ISS, but somehow, Chinese scientist and taikonauts are forbidden? No wonder why China want's to change the world order, because the current one is unfair that's why. And you know what's China's solution to not being allowed on board the ISS? It's to build our own Chinese space station, Tiangong (天宫 "Heavenly Palace"). Already the core module of the Chinese space station, Tianhe (天和) has been launched into orbit and Chinese taikonauts have been sent to prepare the space stations for operation. You said: "Who do u think got China in to the wto and the Un" When the World Trade Organization was founded in 1995, China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate our country as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because the United States, European countries, and Japan requested that China first reform various tariff policies, including tariff reductions, open markets and industrial policies. That's why China had a late entry into WTO in 2001, instead of being a founding member of WTO in 1995. Because the USA and it's allies posed hurdles to China's entry into WTO, so you think Westerners "let" China into WTO? As for the United Nations, China is a charter members of UN and is one of five permanent members in the UN Security Council, so what's there to talk about?
    1
  14709.  @paulbaskerville2748  Congratulations to Russia for landing on Venus surface. China has even landed on Mars, after launching Tianwen (天问) Mars lander on 23 July 2020 and Zhurong (祝融) Mars rover deployed on Mars on 10 Feb 2021. As for India, you claimed they have less crashes but the most recent Indian lunar lander, Chandrayaan-2 crashed into the Moon on 6 Sept 2019, which is tragic loss. You said: "Like I sead China is developed its own stuff it should be the better one and work with all countries. Instead of Xi and his childish incompetence tantrums ." What childish incompetence tantrums? China wanted to work with the West, but the U.S policy forbids NASA from working with China, so how is it China's fault that the USA refuse to work with China? Yet despite China being banned from working with NASA, China has accomplished feats like launching space stations into orbit, landing on the Moon, landing on Mars, and even bringing home lunar rock samples for study. And it's all been achieved without working with NASA You said: "If he was smart he would of got the pipelines in converted the coal plants to natural gas then built wind and solar plants so China has a stable electricity." Let's get this straight, fossil fuels like coal plants are actually more stable than wind and solar power (which depend on the weather conditions and day-night cycle). Furthermore, China actually dominates the world in both wind power and solar power generation already. I've made a playlist on my channel showcasing China's wind and solar power generation. Countries by Wind Power in 2018 1. China (366,000 GWh per year) 2. United States (277,729 GWh per year) 3. Germany (111,590 GWh per year) 4. India (60,311 GWh per year) 5. United Kingdom (57,115 GWh per year) 6. Spain (50,836 GWh per year) 7. Brazil (48,479 GWh per year) 8. Canada (32,170 GWh per year) 9. France (28,167 GWh per year) ... Countries by Solar Power in 2018 1. China (177,500,000 MWh per year) 2. United States (97,118,000 MWh per year) 3. Japan (71,688,000 MWh per year) 4. Germany (46,164,000 MWh per year) 5. India (30,732,000 MWh per year) 6. Italy (23,230,000 MWh per year) 7. United Kingdom (12,921,000 MWh per year) 8. Spain (12,520,000 MWh per year) 9. Australia (12,081,000 MWh per year) ....
    1
  14710.  @paulbaskerville2748  China's manufactures more solar panels than any other country in the world and in 2019, China made around 80% of the world's supply of solar panels. In a remote desert near the Tibetan Plateau in Northwest China, millions of solar panels produce enough electricity to power a midsize American city. This project, one of the largest solar farms ever built, uses raw materials, solar panels, and battery technologies that are produced in China. Not just solar panels, but China also manufactures more wind turbines than any other country in the world at more than half of the world's new wind power capacity. Additionally, China's Mars lander Tianwen (天问) landed on Mars and made China the third country in the world to successfully soft land on the Red Planet and China's Mars rover Zhurong (祝融) sent its first images of the Martian landscape back to Earth.
    1
  14711.  @paulbaskerville2748  What makes you think Peng Shuai isn't free? We have pictures and footage of Peng Shuai attending dinners and attending awards ceremonies for youth athletes what makes you claim Peng Shuai isn't free? Peng even said in a email to Steve Simon of WTA that she was resting at home and that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    1
  14712.  @paulbaskerville2748  It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have gotten used to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United State some day in the future, is simply too frightening for many (but not all) to fathom.
    1
  14713.  @paulbaskerville2748  We already previous discussed Peng Shuai, but you can't refute the points I brought up, then why are you switching the topic to her after you failed to refute my points?
    1
  14714.  @paulbaskerville2748  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here. If anything, it seems like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  14715.  @paulbaskerville2748  Because Canada just detained Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou even though she did not violate any Canadian laws while in Canada. Meng's rights were violated by the Canadian border authorities; she wasn't told for what reason they were detaining her, and she wasn't allowed to contact her lawyer beforehand for advice before following the border authorities. Her smartphone and laptop were confiscated, and their contents unlocked and searched illegally by the border authorities. Even after nearly 3 years of arbitrary detention, Meng pleaded not guilty before Canada finally put her on the first flight back to China. That's why many Chinese harbor negative impression of Canada. Imagine the same thing happening to any Chinese in Canada, getting abducted and detained for no rhyme or reason by the Canadian authorities.
    1
  14716.  @paulbaskerville2748  What "crime" did Meng Wanzhou do, to warrant nearly 3 years of arbitrary detention by Canada? Meng did not break any Canadian laws while in Canada, meanwhile the two Canadians in China were charged with espionage. And what has Meng living in her mansion even got to do with it? You expect China to provide two mansions for the two Canadians, what are you talking about? Meng Wanzhou appeared in Canadian court several times, and she pleaded not guilty and Canada just let her go after wasting nearly 3 years detaining her. Most other countries just charge a fine or something to that effect, but Canada couldn't think up of a crime, so they spent 3 years fabricating some crime to accuse Meng of? And Meng's rights were violated by the Canadian border police; she wasn't allowed to contact her lawyer to ask for advice before following the authorities, her smartphone and laptops were confiscated, and their contents unlocked and searched illegally by the border authorities.
    1
  14717.  @paulbaskerville2748  If Meng had gone to the USA, that would probably spell the end of her hope to return to China. I mean, even former U.S President Trump had publicly said that he's willing to use Meng as a "bargaining chip" to negotiate his trade deal with China from a position of strength, then why Canada willingly let itself be used as a pawn by the USA against China? Meng did not commit any crime (even now, you can't even name her crime) and her rights were violated when her electronic devices were confiscated, unlocked and contents searched illegally by the Canadian border authorities. Meng pleaded non guilty, and Canada just let her go, after wasting nearly 3 years arbitrarily detaining her at the U.S behest. And again, what's the point of your mentioning Meng living in a mansion? That mansion was purchased, whereas the two Michaels in China were arrested on charges of espionage, so you're expected China to build mansions for them?
    1
  14718.  @paulbaskerville2748  Meng Wanzhou did not willingly stay in Canada, she was detained by the Canadian border authorities, otherwise she would have boarded the first flight home back to China. If anything, Meng's flight path didn't even cross the USA at all. From September to December 2018, Meng traveled to France, Britain, Ireland, Poland, Singapore, Japan and Belgium. All seven countries are having a bilateral agreement on extradition with the U.S, yet they did not detain Meng, it was only when Meng stopped in Canada did Canada agree to do the U.S dirty work. I mean, face it, you can't even name Meng's so-called "crime" at all. Meng has pleaded not guilty and Canada just let her go, after wasting nearly 3 years detaining Meng on USA's behest. And the U.S doesn't really care about Meng. Former president Trump had said he was willing to use Meng as a "bargaining chip" against China that means he's not really interested in Meng's so-called "crime" as long as he gets to benefit out of using her arrest against China. The U.S got Canada to detain Meng in order to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride that's all.
    1
  14719.  @paulbaskerville2748  You can't even name Meng's so-called "crime", yet you're accusing me of "lies and properganda" because you can't stand to see China succeed that's all. I've already previously discussed Chinese government's fentanyl crackdown, you can't refute my points so you just bring them up again that's all.
    1
  14720.  @paulbaskerville2748  We've been over this already. In 1947, the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) published the 11 Dash Line that Taiwan island still pursues today, and was inherited by the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 after the KMT fled to Taiwan island. But PRC removed two dashes, that's why we have the 9 Dash Line today. And we have previously established that the arbitration tribunal that did the verdict on the South China Sea is the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which is a non-UN agency and it only rents space in the same building as the UN’s International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Hague. But the two organisations are not related, and they have different levels of jurisdiction over sovereignty. Didn't we gone over this before?
    1
  14721.  @paulbaskerville2748  You said: "soon no more Xi" President Xi Jinping has shown to be a strong and competent leader, able to govern a country of 1.4 billion people (certainly no easy feat) and guiding China through the pandemic, then why should China get rid of a leader that works for China? Look at the quality of leaders that Western democracies have produced, like Donald Trump, Boris Johnson, Scott Morrison, etc, then is there really a need for China to get rid of a competent leader like Xi Jinping?
    1
  14722.  @paulbaskerville2748  The coal shortage was felt all over the world, not just in China alone. And the energy shortage in China began on Nov 2021, whereas China had previously imposed a ban on Australian coal on Nov 2020, so that was 1 year earlier, so how is the ban on Australian coal the cause of power shortage in China? Anyway, the power shortages in China have since been resolved, even without lifting the ban on Australian coal.
    1
  14723.  @paulbaskerville2748  Besides, didn't I already mention China being the largest producer of Solar Power and Wind Power? Here's the data again: Countries by Wind Power in 2018 1. China (366,000 GWh per year) 2. United States (277,729 GWh per year) 3. Germany (111,590 GWh per year) 4. India (60,311 GWh per year) 5. United Kingdom (57,115 GWh per year) 6. Spain (50,836 GWh per year) 7. Brazil (48,479 GWh per year) 8. Canada (32,170 GWh per year) 9. France (28,167 GWh per year) ... Countries by Solar Power in 2018 1. China (177,500,000 MWh per year) 2. United States (97,118,000 MWh per year) 3. Japan (71,688,000 MWh per year) 4. Germany (46,164,000 MWh per year) 5. India (30,732,000 MWh per year) 6. Italy (23,230,000 MWh per year) 7. United Kingdom (12,921,000 MWh per year) 8. Spain (12,520,000 MWh per year) 9. Australia (12,081,000 MWh per year) ....
    1
  14724.  @paulbaskerville2748  Here's the countries by Hydropower electricity and once again, China ranks top in the world in hydroelectric power, since the Three Gorges Dam is the world's largest hydroelectric power station. Countries by Hydropower in 2018 1. China (1,229.42 TWh) 2. Brazil (414.11 TWh) 3. Canada (382.11 TWh) 4. USA (294.42 TWh) 5. Russia (184.03 TWh) 6. Norway (139.79 TWh) 7. India (130.07 TWh) 8. Japan (88.61 TWh) 9. Venezuela (70.77 TWh) ...
    1
  14725.  @paulbaskerville2748  You want to talk about childish incompent leaders then just look at Western democracies electing leaders like Donald Trump, Boris Johnson, Scott Morrison and they are far more incompetent. Look at Joe Biden, he was confident that the US withdrawal from Afghanistan would be a great success, but look at how chaotic the withdrawal from Afghanistan was. Joe Biden didn't even consult US allies troops stationed in Afghanistan before unilaterally withdrawing US troops from Afghanistan.
    1
  14726.  @paulbaskerville2748  Westerners have been polluting the Earth since 200-300 years ago, back when the Industrial Revolution started in 1700-1800s. Whereas China only recently industrialised some 40 years ago in comparison, yet China already dominates the world in solar power, wind power and hydroelectric power generation.
    1
  14727.  @paulbaskerville2748  Again, the global shortage in coal was felt all over the world, not just in China alone. India experienced coal shortage, USA experienced coal shortage, European countries experienced coal shortage, just like China. And China banning Australian coal was on Nov 2020, whereas the energy shortage was on Nov 2021, that's 1 year after so the ban wasn't the cause of the coal shortage in China. Because other countries in the world experienced it as well.
    1
  14728.  @paulbaskerville2748  Now you're just feeding your anti-China hate that's all. Earlier you mocked Chinese eating habits, but when Chinese fishermen expand their fishing grounds, you still complain. Now you're complaining about China banning Australian coal, yet when China dominates the renewable energy production in the world, you complain about China coal pollution. It's apparent that you're just anti-China that's all, and anything China does is automatically wrong in your biased eyes.
    1
  14729.  @paulbaskerville2748  When you compare population against carbon dioxide emissions, then China's CO2 emissions per capita is actually lower than the next biggest CO2 emitter, the United States. China's is 7.38 tonnes of CO2 per person, whereas in the United States, it's 15.52 tonnes of CO2 per person.
    1
  14730.  @kail1507  Abe been Japan's prime minister since 2006 (14 years) Western Media: "Huzzah! Respect for Japanese PM! Long live Japanese PM!" Xi Jinping been China's President since 2013 (7 years) Western Media: "Boo! Down with China! Down with President for life!"
    1
  14731. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14732. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14733. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14734. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  14735. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14736. Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14737. Even Taiwan's own constitution acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14738.  @yehenry2281  That money is going to be laundered and recycled back into the bank accounts of corrupt Western elites.
    1
  14739. From what I head, many Amazon product commenters seem to be hired by their own companies to give good reviews of their company's products and bad reviews to rival companies' products.
    1
  14740. Another myth that some Westerners (not all) believe is the organ harvesting myth in China.
    1
  14741. Apart from the Social Credit System, some Westerners still believe the organ harvesting rumors in China.
    1
  14742.  @thiambengkhor2647  Agreed. Once U.S relocates Taiwan's chip manufacturing to the American mainland, then Taiwan is of no further importance to the U.S, and they are far less likely to commit American troops to defend Taiwan. If anything, the country that cares the most about Taiwan is mainland China itself.
    1
  14743. Exactly. Netanyahu wasn't even popular before Oct 7, but he's using that attack to distract away from his political problems.
    1
  14744. polifatts Japan today is a US puppet, its military no longer as powerful, and reduced to mere "self-defense" force and its economy is currently in a slump, whereas China is in defiance of USA, and PLA is world's largest land army and our economy is world's 2nd largest. So how is Japan most successful Asian country?
    1
  14745. Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitor (just ask the expats here). However, many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly viewing Chinese in their lands with suspicion.
    1
  14746.  @romanceidiot  Well said. If China rises, then the reputation of Chinese (as well as other Asians) is raised as well. However, if China is demonized, then Chinese will also suffer. Some also suffer from the "colonial mentality" of worshiping Anglo-Saxon culture while harboring a disdain for any non-white culture (including their own). I also find it hypocritical of mark yeung to assign blame to China, when China has remained neutral in the Russo-Ukraine conflict. China has sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine and called for peaceful negotiations to end the war, whereas the United States sent weapons and military aid to Ukraine to prolong the war.
    1
  14747.  @msimon6808  "神州 Shenzhou All that 'freedom' and 'liberty' stuff is poison." Just look at how the fabric of American society is being torn apart. Americans have never been more divided that they are today, and it's enacting a steep toll on their sense of unity. If China were to behave like the U.S, I'm pretty sure China would have fragmented into several smaller states, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong and unified country we are today.
    1
  14748.  @MicahisaRAT2  China offered to organize any potential peace talks on Ukraine to Russia. China is neutral in the Ukraine issue, and China has sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine, whereas the NATO countries are sending lethal aid to Ukraine and prolonging the war. If anything, isn't the NATO being the warmonger here?
    1
  14749. ​ @Joshua_N-A  It's actually a good idea to have the PLA loyal to the communist party. Because in Asia, there have been military coups (i.e. in Thailand and more recently Myanmar) where the military overthrew the government and seize political control, plunging the country into chaos and civil strife in the process. By ensuring PLA remains loyal to the party, the Chinese government is ensuring continued peace in China.
    1
  14750. USA don't put tariffs on anything? America is world's most protectionist country with over 800 of such measures. China in comparison has only about 200-300 of such measures. Source: Map of countries with the most protectionist measures en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Protectionist_measures_taken_2008–2013_according_to_Global_Trade_Alert.png
    1
  14751. Chinese propaganda clearly sucks and needs improvement. Hardly anyone believes Chinese propaganda, despite the fact that Chinese media often quote data and statistics from primary sources. On the other hand, Western propaganda is very effective, almost everyone blindly believe what Western MSM says about China, even though its unsupported by actual evidence.
    1
  14752. If it's called the International Space Station, then why are Chinese astronauts not allowed on board this so-called "International" space station? Why is China excluded?
    1
  14753.  @Greego-z1z  Cyrus Janssen's video message is about improving relations between China and the U.S. (i.e Building Bridges, Not Walls, between the two countries). Since you claim that Cyrus is the ambassador for the CPC, are you saying that CPC is promoting this very same positive message?
    1
  14754. In 2005, China submitted an application for Uighur culture (Uyghur Muqam of Xinjiang) to be recognized as a UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage and it was inscribed by 2008. Yet media in the west claims China is trying to wipe out Uighur culture?
    1
  14755. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14756.  @kamroneshkqobilov1040  Contrary to what some people believe, the conflict in Ukraine didn't began on Feb 2022, it had been ongoing since 2014. Oliver Stone has a documentary entitled "Ukraine on Fire" and I highly recommend it as a starting point for people interested in knowing the root cause of the conflict.
    1
  14757.  @naniy7736  China can afford to build "thousand-bed hospitals" in days, yet USA only has "tents" even after they had months to prepare? China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html Why did so many countries watch the epidemic unfold for weeks as though it was none of their concern?
    1
  14758.  @Zurcwind  Is there something wrong with my copy-pasting this comment? Chinese government and workers rushed to build the thousand-bed hospitals in days, whereas USA had months to prepare (Italy and Iran were struck earlier) and all President Trump did was downplay the virus. And now US has erected "tents" to treat the patients.
    1
  14759.  @3eason40  America is actually dependent on China for almost 80% of its medicines, which is especially important given the current situation. Fox Business reports that according to FDA estimate at least 80 percent of active ingredients found in all of America’s medicine come from abroad, primarily from China. And it’s not just the ingredients, China wants to become the world’s dominant generic drug maker. So far Chinese companies are making generic for everything from high blood pressure to chemotherapy drugs. 90 percent of America’s prescriptions are for generic drugs. Source: U.S. is Dependent on China for Almost 80% of Its Medicine saraacarter.com/u-s-is-dependent-on-china-for-almost-80-of-its-medicine/
    1
  14760.  A D  "You people"? The Chinese people eating bat-soup causing Covid-19 claim has been debunked. Source: Is bat soup a delicacy in China? We debunk a rumour on the origin of the coronavirus observers.france24.com/en/20200203-china-coronavirus-bat-soup-debunk-videos-viral-palau-indonesia
    1
  14761.  @laus7080  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  14762. @Coleen West What makes you think Chinese people lack freedoms? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  14763. @Coleen West Previously Hong Kong was under British authoritarian colonial rule, in which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's 1997 handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy? When they had none before, for 150 years as British colony?
    1
  14764. @Coleen West Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  14765.  J Fitz  How do Chinese movies underrepresent Anglo-Saxon people? Anglo-Saxons aren't a majority in China so they get understandbly less exposure in Chinese movies.
    1
  14766.  Charles Schmidd  You're the most hardcore Western funded CIA-wumao, you're literally everywhere.
    1
  14767. It's like the story of the Tortoise and the Hare. NATO (Hare) is throwing everything at Russia and pouring weapons into Ukraine, exhausting themselves before reaching the finish line. While Russia (Tortoise) has weathered the brunt of the sanctions placed on it, yet is still making incremental progress towards the finish line.
    1
  14768.  @cchannel7857  Capitalism has enacted its toll on the people of Hong Kong and increased inequity. Hong Kong is home to both the mega rich and the mega poor. About 93 billionaires live in Hong Kong, and 1 in 7 residents are millionaires. But at the same time, 1 in 5 people in Hong Kong lives under the city’s poverty line and the richest households can make 44 times what the poorest family can scrape together. Because capitalism allows the Hong Kong property tycoons to control the scarce supply of land, and raise real estate prices to be beyond the reach of Hong Kong couples seeking to apply for an apartment. Hong Kong government doesn't earn revenue from taxing businesses (i.e Hong Kong is a tax haven for capitalists) so the government earns revenue from taxing land sales, that's why they don't feel an obligation to keep land prices down, because that would mean less income for the government.
    1
  14769. In order for peace to prevail in this world, we need to dismantle the U.S Military-Industrial Complex, that has infiltrated various think-tanks and media in order to stoke fear and spread paranoia about other countries, so that U.S allies buy more U.S weapons.
    1
  14770.  Moonland Almond  Taiwan is an inalienable part of China. Even Taiwan's own constitution says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, nor any formal declaration of independence, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  14771.  @wesleynichols1873  "神州 Shenzhou But you seem to misunderstand, mainland China belongs to Taiwan as that's the original land of them." If it belongs to them, then why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, communists were at a severe disadvantage compared to the Nationalist Kuomintang, whom btw had massive wealth (taxation of peasants), superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite the KMT's initial advantages, they still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communist's right to rule China.
    1
  14772.  潘poon  If Taiwan can claim all of mainland China as part of their territory, then likewise, the mainland can also claim Taiwan island as part of our territory. As the saying goes: "what's good for the goose is good for the gander."
    1
  14773. NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM Mao Zedong was only human, and made mistakes like one. Pre-Mao China was a dirt-poor, war-torn and starving country. China was divided into various provinces ruled by warlords, and China lost control of provinces like Tibet and Xinjiang. The KMT (Nationalists) ruled mainland China from 1912-1949 but still failed to unify all China, despite ruling China for almost 40 years. But in 1949, Mao Zedong managed to unify China under communism, and founded People's Republic of China in 1949, and succeeded where the previous KMT administration had failed. Although Mao made some disastrous policies during his rule, without him, China would probably still be fragmented into different provinces and fighting amongst ourselves even till today.
    1
  14774.  @stevechmiel6016  That's why I said China welcome Westerners as visitors. China has strict immigration laws because China has to host the world's largest population, so frankly speaking, China has no real need for immigrants. At the most, China's immigration policy prioritizes attracting foreign talent, or overseas born Chinese seeking to return to the homeland, so that the social fabric of society remains stable. Whereas the U.S immigration laws are loose, and virtually any immigrant who has a family member or relative who's American, are already themselves eligible to apply for U.S citizenship. That's why many immigrants marry Americans for citizenship so they can import their families over. This policy has resulted in changes to local population demographics in USA, upsetting the social fabric much to the disgruntlement of some Americans (not all) that dislike immigrants. I hope you can see that both China and USA's immigration policy have their own strengths and weaknesses.
    1
  14775. ​ @canuck21  That's why like I said, China welcome Westerners as visitors, for the reasons explained above. China already has to host the world's largest population, so there's no real reason why China should accept more immigrants than absolutely necessary. Our immigration policy has strict requirements that foreigners need to meet, if they wish to apply for Chinese citizenship. Whereas in Western countries, they need a supply of cheap labor, that's why many Western countries open the floodgates to immigrants, and social issues have arose as a result of immigrants stealing jobs (whether real or perceived) or not assimilating into their host country's culture. Whether real or perceived, these are the social problems accompany immigration, that cause disgruntlement among locals.
    1
  14776.  @hyc1266  Agreed. China already has a huge labor force ourselves, so there's no real need to employ low-wage foreign workers. China's universities are also training the world's largest number of STEM graduates at 4.7 million according to World Economic Forum. The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates (2016) 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United Sates (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: World Economic Forum So China only admits the bare minimum number of immigrants and no more than absolutely necessary. Priority citizenship is offered to overseas born Chinese wanting to return to the motherland (most ideal for reintegration), and perhaps to foreigners with something positive to contribute to China.
    1
  14777.  @canuck21  "神州 Shenzhou Why do you even need to point out that China is welcoming to visitors?" Why can't I as Chinese, point out that China is welcoming to visitors? There was a volunteer shouting "Welcome to China!" to welcome the athletes during the Beijing Winter Olympics opening ceremony. Whereas in contrast, there have been Westerners (butt not all) who tell Chinese in their lands to "Go back to China!" As for the immigrant policy, I believe I have previously outlined the reasons why China doesn't really need immigrants.
    1
  14778.  @canuck21  You said: "You're not getting my point about immigration either but it's not surprising how slow you are. Very typical of someone with limited understanding of the world." More insults? What makes you seem think I have limited understanding of the world? I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, that's why we are having this conservation in English. But have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  14779.  @canuck21  "神州 Shenzhou Yes, I have been to China before." Which part of our country of China did you visit? If you've truly been, then you would have realize that many Chinese warmly welcome foreigners to our land as visitors. You said: "Based on your comments you seem to have little understanding of the big picture." Again, you seem to be belittling me, even though I've explained that I studied English and traveled to the West before. Which part of my comments demonstrates little understanding of the "big picture"?
    1
  14780.  @canuck21  "神州 Shenzhou I visited Beijing, Xi'An and Shanghai. I never said Chinese people were not welcoming to visitors." If you visited those cities, then why'd you said: ""神州 Shenzhou Why do you even need to point out that China is welcoming to visitors?" I mean, can't I point out this point that both of us seem to agree on? You said: "The emphasis is on the word visitors. This again shows that you are still not grasping the point." That's what I've been saying all along. Visitors. How am I not grasping the point? I've previously elaborated my views on visitors and immigrants You said: "Maybe your English still needs work." Again with the belittlement. So my current standard of English does not appear to meet your high requirements, but the point was that you accused me of being "someone with limited understanding of the world." then what has my English proficiency got to do with it? If anything, the fact that I'm a Chinese speaking to you in English clearly demonstrates a fair level of understanding of how the world works. I mean, you mock my English proficiency and that I somehow "don't understand the big picture," then how's your Mandarin proficiency for comparison? You've claimed to been to some Chinese cities, but how proficient are you in the Chinese language?
    1
  14781.  @canuck21  Yes, we are not discussing in Mandarin and neither am I mocking you on your Mandarin proficiency (if any). However, it's apparent that my English proficiency is not up to your insanely high standards, such that you would rather attack my command of the English language, rather than address my points. You said: "It's really you having weird reasoning." Moving from belittling my English proficiency to now attacking my reasoning? In what why is my reasoning weird? I've outlined my stance towards visitors and immigrants in previous comments and won't repeat them again, yet it seems you're unable to point out where exactly is my reasoning flawed, just seemingly continuing to attack my English and reasoning that's all. You said: "And no, knowing a foreign language does not automatically means one understands the world. What weird thinking you have there." How is this thinking weird? Learning a foreign language grants one a better understanding of the world, since it allows for access to information from alternative foreign sources. It's like you seem to think the world only speaks one language and that's it. You said: "Again, your views on visitors and immigrants shows that YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND." That's what you've been repeating again and again, telling me that I don't understand, and again you refuse to elaborate, you just criticize my English proficiency is all. We are beginning to see a pattern here. You said: "I understand that China doesn't need immigrants and I'm not arguing that China does. The fact that you keep saying that shows you don't get it." Then we are in agreement, since that's the stance I've adopted all along. So how am I not getting it (like you keep saying)? You said: "The point is that you have no reason to brag that China is welcoming to visitors because which country isn't?" The U.S for starters, isn't really that welcoming towards Chinese visitors. That's the whole reason why I posted this comment, yet now you're claiming I have no reason for such a post? You said: "You even used the Olympics to brag how welcoming the Chinese are. Like really? The Olympics?" Is there something fundamentally wrong with using the Olympics as an example of Chinese hospitality? You said: " The whole point of the Olympics is the show a face so of course you're going to be welcoming at the Olympics" Yes, but that's one example, and it also happens outside of the Olympics. I mean, you've previously stated that you've been to Beijing, Xi'An and Shanghai, and that you never said Chinese people were not welcoming to visitors. So it's not just limited to the Olympics. ... And lastly, you made the claim that I'm slow, that it's typical of someone with limited understanding of the world, and that I have no understanding of "the big picture" and now even resorting to mocking my English proficiency, then it's as though you're just hurling ad hominem attacks against me that's all. Why not resort to attacking my points instead of attacking me personally?
    1
  14782.  @kasperknutsen8283  "神州 Shenzhou china is a machine country" China is home to world's largest automation market, and investing heavily into Artificial Intelligence systems. Video: China International Robot Show defines the future of robotic industry youtube.com/watch?v=Sj8lK65fJic&
    1
  14783.  @kasperknutsen8283  Statistically speaking, as world's most populous country, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to carry out said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and China has 4 geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Taken from the above: Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  14784. Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, clothing, sneakers, etc, cheap and affordable, so that the cost of living in other countries is lower than it should be. Think of the millions of dollars people in other countries have saved over the years on living expenses, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on luxury brands, cars, housing, or necessities like school fees, doctors fees, tuition fees, etc.
    1
  14785. Yeah, there's a lot of holes in the timeline of Bucha, such as why'd the mayor of the Bucha didn't know about the existence of those bodies, if they've been just lying there for weeks, and still tweeted that "all is well" after the Russians left.
    1
  14786. You foreigners always complain Chinese people are rude, spit in public, smoke in public, jaywalk, jump queues, disobey traffic laws, and so on, so what the government is attempting to do is to discourage such undesirable behavior through this social credit system. And if your score falls too low, you will not be able to purchase air tickets to leave the country and make a menace of yourself overseas.
    1
  14787. Tell that to Huawei and soon to be, TikTok.
    1
  14788. +Mayur Dawani China manufacture own weapons, while India relies on importing foreign military equipment. During wartime, China can always make more weapons, ammunition, tanks and fighter jets, but India would have to import its weapons from USA and Russia, and subject to their prices, which they will probably increase, since they know India has no other choice.
    1
  14789. What if you encounter a beautiful woman named Mao? Or if you are a girl, a handsome man named Mao?
    1
  14790. +Remco van Vliet Why would I want that?
    1
  14791. @Anthony M Post Soviet states have been tricked with the promise of economic improvement when if they join the EU, but the deals offered are not in favour of their own countries. Putin has wanted assurance that NATO would not expand eastward (i.e that Ukraine will not be allowed to join NATO). Many NATO countries like France and Germany are reluctant to admit Ukraine into NATO (citing concerns over Ukraine government corruption) but they refused to put that down in writting to reassure Putin. After realising that for years, his words had fallen on deaf ears, Putin finally decided to act.
    1
  14792.    Singapore has been governed by the same political party for their entire life. For 55 years, the People's Action Party ruled Singapore with an iron fist. Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore's founder) was a dictator who tolerated no dissent and jailed or exiled dissidents and political rivals. Yet under PAP leadership, Singapore transformed from sleepy fishing village to a world class country today. When Lee Kuan Yew died, masses of people turned up for his funeral. Doesn’t Singapore sound similar to China being under the CPC control for 71 years?
    1
  14793.    Name one case? Look what happened to Singapore dissident Francis Seow under the dictatorship of Lee Kuan Yew. He lived in exile from Singapore after facing lawsuits from Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore's first Prime Minister. He became embroiled in the politics surrounding the role of the Law Society. He had envisaged a restoration of the role of the Law Society to comment on legislation that the government churned out without any meaningful parliamentary debate, to which Lee took special exception. As a result, Lee caused special legislation to be passed that deprived the Law Society of any power to comment on legislation unless specifically asked to by the government. Just before the election, on 6 May 1988, Seow was detained without trial under the Internal Security Act for 72 days. He was accused of having received political campaign finance from the United States to promote democracy in Singapore. According to his account, he was subjected to torture, including sleep deprivation and intensely cold air conditioning. Did you actually study Singapore history and see what happens to Singapore dissidents like Francis Seow? You don't even do research, yet accuse others of being a laughing stock? I already shown that Lee Kuan Yew was a dictator who tolerated no dissent and jailed or exiled dissidents and political rivals. And there's the fact that Singapore has been governed by authoritarian single-party PAP for 55 years just like China has been governed by authoritarian single-party CPC for 71 years. You can't deny the similarities.
    1
  14794.    I already name you one case of Singapore dissident, Francis Seow. According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore ( hrw.org/asia/singapore )： Singapore’s political environment is stifling. Citizens face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. So doesn't Singapore's political system sound very similar to China's political system? What freedom to protest in Singapore are you talking about? You don't even bother to do research, yet you're accusing me of being a laughing stock when you don't even know Singapore's political system is authoritarian in nature?
    1
  14795.    What's wrong with pointing out the similarities between Singapore's and China's political systems? You post such a long-ass comment trying differentiate Singapore's political system from China's, yet you're telling me to go do something with my life? In addition to calling me a laughing stock? There's this Singapore social worker and activist Jolovan Wham, arrested by Singapore police, just for holding up a cardboard board with a "smiley face" outside a police station in Singapore. Source: Aljazeera: Singapore activist in court over one-man ‘smiley face’ protest aljazeera.com/news/2020/11/23/singapore-activist-charged-over-one-man-smiley-face-protest
    1
  14796.    So you're agreeing that Singapore's Internal Security Act is authoritarian? Then we are in agreement that Singapore is under the authoritarian rule of the PAP (for 55 years) just like China is under the authoritarian rule of the CPC (for 71 years). China has very strict drug laws too, I'm bit disputing the differences, I'm pointing out the similarities between Singapore's and China's political systems that's all.
    1
  14797.    What's wrong with my character, my actions and my words? I'm comparing the similarities between Singapore's and China's political systems that's all and I quote sources to support my arguments where possible. I don't resort to hurling personal insults against my opponent, just because their views happen to differ from mine, yet you're resorting yourself mocking me for my views? All I'm saying is that Singapore's political system is similar to China's and listing out the similarities that's all. What's the problem with that?
    1
  14798.    So if you agree that Singapore's Internal Security Act is the law, then you're agreeing that Singapore is under the authoritarian rule of the PAP, which is exactly what I'm saying, so we are in agreement after all. Then how exactly are you pointing out differences when you're points agree with mine that Singapore's government is authoritarian, similar to China's?
    1
  14799.    "神州 Shenzhou And I'm quoting there's no similarity so what's wrong with that?? You call these insults??" Your points literally support mine, I even shown an example of Singapore dissenter, Francis Seow and Lee Kuan Yew arrested him, to which you can't refute. I cited Human Rights Watch: Singapore (hrw.org/asia/singapore ) showing that Singapore’s political environment is stifling. Citizens face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. I even gave an example of a protester arrested for showing smiley face on cardboard outside a police station in Singapore. Yet you refuted my points with verbal insults like calling me a laughing stock (when I'm the one doing research and citing sources) and a hypocrite. You can't refute my points that Singapore's system is authoritarian like China's, so you resort to verbally insulting your opponent instead of refuting my points?
    1
  14800.    Every protest in Singapore has been met with crackdown by the authoritarian government. Even Singapore police are issuing warnings against possible protests over the situation in Myanmar. Source: Police warn against plans to protest in Singapore over situation in Myanmar channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/police-warn-against-protest-plans-singapore-over-myanmar-14119078 So doesn't Singapore's political system sound similar to China's political system?
    1
  14801. Peta Gonkyi Chinese people also been using pots and pans since thousands of years ago. The Chinese Wok is the king of all metallic cooking vessels, able to perform wide variety of cooking methods such as stir-frying, steaming, pan frying, deep frying, poaching, boiling, braising, searing, stewing, making soup, smoking and roasting nuts.
    1
  14802.  @barrywhite1770  But again how are democracies always are more stable in the long run (like you boasted earlier)? One need only look back at civilization history to find that most countries gravitated towards traditionally authoritarian forms of government where political power is often concentrated not in the hands of the masses, but instead in the hands of the few elites, such as nobles (aristocracy), priests (theocracy), or kings and emperors (monarchy). Such authoritarian forms of government were dominant throughout history because they were stable and because they worked! The elites were often politically savvy enough to make important decisions regarding the country's future, while the ignorant masses were kept far away from politics. In fact, democracy has a history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, even the Republic of Rome fell. All these proto-democracies were some variant of democracies, yet they were historically unsuccessful. In fact, democracy wasn't even popular outside of Greece, in say, African countries, the Middle East and Greater EurAsia and South East Asia, virtually the rest of the world outside of Europe. Modern Western-style democracy is a different breed from earlier forms of democracy, but that means it has only around 100-200 years of history. In fact, most of human history has been under authoritarian rule, for 1000-2000 years, not the last 100-200 years.
    1
  14803.  @orangebanana845  Hong Kong was taken from China by the British. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Hong Kong was made into a British colony to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even after Britain renounced ownership over its former colonies, Hong Kong was not even fully returned back to China. Instead, China had to sign a declaration with Britain for them to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  14804. ​@Robert Flores said "Hong Kong will be independent trust me" Hong Kong depends on the mainland for food, water and electricity. About 70% of HK water demand is met by importing water from the Dongjiang River in neighbouring Guangdong province. Hong Kong electrical grid is interconnected with the China Southern Power Grid of Mainland China. Hong Kong imports 23% of its total electricity needs from the mainland. So how is Hong Kong going to gain independence then?
    1
  14805. In Aesop's Fable of the Tortoise and the Hare, NATO is the Hare, mocking Russia for making slow progress, while throwing all its sanctions on Russia while pouring military aid to Ukraine. Until NATO exhausted all available options and the finish line is nowhere in sight. Meanwhile, Russia is the Tortoise, slowly grinding down the enemy's strength and not playing all its cards right at the beginning.
    1
  14806.  Raymond Seow Soo Huai  EPOCH = Everybody P**ses On CHina NTD = Never Trusted Deceiver RFA = Really False Americans?
    1
  14807. Chinese companies dominate the 2019 Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands according to this source: mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html Top 10 Global Mobile Phone Brands in 2019 1st Place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French)
    1
  14808.  @mosquitobight  Why do you want Chinese people to remove Communist Party of China from power, and introduce democracy and fair multiparty elections? China's political system has thus far, shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  14809. Rohi Maity Why don't you explain Nehru's actions then? Zhou Enlai visited New Delhi 4 times, whereas PM Nehru only visited Beijing once. Zhou also proposed that India drop its claim to Aksai Chin and China would withdraw its claims from Tawang (so that occupied territories will become part of each countries territory) but Nehru rejected this proposal. You claim India has weakest army at that time, then why did Nehru aggressively build military bases at our disputed border, as part of his Forward Policy?
    1
  14810.  @mathewg5884  And Philippines recognize Taiwan as part of China, so he's clearly a Chinese fisherman. And like I said, what brute force, when no Filipino fisherman has been shot to death by the Chinese coastguard?
    1
  14811.  @Todd-rk2lb  Both Taiwan and mainland China maintain the claim of the South China Sea being part of Chinese territory.
    1
  14812.  @mathewg5884  But those Filipino weren't killed, unlike the 65-year old Chinese fisherman Hong Shicheng. So who's using brute force here?
    1
  14813.  @rhannightowl173  Republic of China claimed the South China Sea Islands by publishing the 11-Dash Line in 1947 and back then, even the Americans reminded the Philippines at their independence that the Spratly Islands wasn't Philippines territory.
    1
  14814.  @jm97117  Self defence could have been achieved by water cannon, not by actual gunfire, resulting in the death of a 65-year old Chinese fisherman. Also the Bailintag island is not within Philippines maritime boundary as per the 1898 Treaty of Paris. (Source: Wikipedia: File: Ph boundary in Treaty of Paris 1898)
    1
  14815.  @philipodina9573  Social Credit Score is another myth, just ask any Chinese whether such a system exists in China.
    1
  14816.  @pinkyramos620  Philippines parked a grounded vessel onto the Second Thomas Shoal, and continues to reinforce the hull of the rusting vessel, and refuses to remove it, then who's the one bullying here? And a 65-year old Chinese fisherman was shot to death by Philippines coastguard, meanwhile no Filipino fisherman has been shot to death by Chinese coastguard.
    1
  14817.  @jm97117  The 2016 arbitral ruling was made the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which is NOT an official UN agency, unlike say the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Since the ruling was not made by an official UN agency, then China reserves the right not to adhere to its ruling.
    1
  14818.  @nixtrope  Shameless? It's the Philippines that parked a rusty vessel on the Second Thomas Shoal in an attempt to change the status quo there. In 1999, Philippine president Joseph Estrada promised that the vessel would be towed away. In 2014, the Chinese government asked the Philippines to remove the grounded ship. In 2017, China and the Philippines established a gentlemen's agreement that the status quo be maintained for the South China Sea, as both sides tried to strengthen their relations. Under the status quo agreement, no construction materials are allowed to fortify the Sierra Madre. Yet the Philippines went back on their word and sent supply ships to reinforce the rusting hull of the grounded vessel, in violation of the agreement.
    1
  14819.  @nixtrope  The fact remains that 65-year old Chinese fisherman Hong Shicheng was shot dead by gunfire from the Philippines coastguard. Yet people accuse China of brute force.
    1
  14820.  @littlesenorita1488  The Spanish changed Philippines boundary in the 1898 Treaty of Paris where it no longer included the Spratly Islands as part of its territory. And the Republic of China published the 11-Dash Line in 1947.
    1
  14821.  @nixtrope  Of course, you don't care if a Chinese fisherman is shot by the Philippines coastguard, you just brush it off like his life doesn't matter. Yet there aren't any Filipino fisherman that have been shot by Chinese coastguard.
    1
  14822.  @littlesenorita1488  "the 1734 Murillo Velarde Map... While there was no legal basis for China's expansive claims on the other hand." 1734 Murillo Velarde Map was drawn up by Spanish for the Philippines. Drawn up by foreigners who had no knowledge of the local geography and political boundaries (and without consulting neighboring countries) so how's that a legal claim? As a colonizer, of course the Spanish would want to draw large boundary for their colony, but how does that make it legal? Meanwhile, China's claims are based on historical claims and drawn up by local Chinese officials.
    1
  14823.  @rhannightowl173  Both Taiwan and PRC consider themselves China. Taiwan goes by the name Republic of China and the 65-year old fisherman's name is Chinese (Hong Shicheng) written in Chinese characters (洪石成). As for what response, like I said, there's always the option of water cannon, rather than actual gunfire resulting in death of the fisherman. Meanwhile, no Filipino fisherman have been shot to death by Chinese coastguard.
    1
  14824.  @broernztyt  According to an article: Who Supports China in the South China Sea and Why published by The Diplomat, the authors found that 70 countries support China's stance in the South China Sea, compared to the 5-7 countries that support Philippines' stance.
    1
  14825.  @broernztyt  "What kind of civilization is China today? Stone aged civilization," China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witness the rise and fall of various other countries, yet China has survived to modern times relatively intact. Today, China is also an advanced space nation, having successfully landed a lunar lander (Chang'e-6) on the far side of the Moon.
    1
  14826.  @sv4527  "神州 Shenzhou then why are they bullying their smaller neighbouring countries?" Because the USA thinks that they're so powerful that's why they bully Canada and Mexico. And they wage wars in the Middle East such as Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, Pakistan War, and so on.
    1
  14827. Source: China on course to become 'world's most Christian nation' within 15 years telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/10776023/China-on-course-to-become-worlds-most-Christian-nation-within-15-years.html At least in China, you must register your Christian religious belief with the government first, and as long as you are registered Christian and you obey Chinese laws while in China, then you can do what you want.
    1
  14828. +Total War Fan Go ahead. Be my guest. At least President Xi gets things done, whereas PM Modi direct Indian nationalist anger outward towards China, instead of focusing on dealing with India's internal problems.
    1
  14829. +Shay and Both Russia and China share common goal of opposing US hegemony, but some Indians still believe that Russia is allies with India for India's sake, when Russia is only helping India to oppose USA that's all. They still believe that USA and Russia will join with India against China, when in reality every country has its own goals.
    1
  14830. You really believe those organ-harvesting rumors? I mean, no world leader has ever approached President Xi Jinping about allegations of organ harvesting, not Obama, not Trump, not Biden, not Canadian PM Trudeau, German Chancellor Merkel, French President Macron, British PM Johnson, Russian President Putin, Indian PM Modi, or any world leader for that matter, so why'd you still believe in rumors of ongoing organ-harvesting in China?
    1
  14831.  @ReallyBadJosy  The problem occurs when people in power think they can fight against this inevitable transition (from a unipolar world to a multipolar world). They've gotten used to the idea they'll always be in power, and thus they control the MSM and other sources of information in order to keep others thinking the same way.
    1
  14832.  @yslee1401  "Tiananmen Square massacre in 4 June 1989" That's a myth. A Chilean diplomat (Carlos Gallo and his wife) was visiting Beijing at that time and he provided eyewitness account of the events unfolding inside Tiananmen Square. He did not observe any mass firing of guns inside the Square, and he said that the troops entering the Square were armed with mostly truncheons and wooden clubs (i.e anti-riot gear). The truth was that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square June 1989.
    1
  14833.  @yslee1401  "Xinjiang-concentration camps disguised as rehabilitation centres." Another myth. People have visited the geographica coordinates corresponding to the sites from satellite pictures and found them to be schools, dormitories, elderly folk homes, and other civilian structures. -The "detention center" (geographic coordinates: 38.8367N, 77.7056E) claimed by ASPI, is actually an old folks home in Markit county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang -The "detention center" (geographic coordinates: 38.9950N, 77.6682E) claimed by ASPI, is actually an elementary school in Yantaq township, Markit county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang. -The "detention center" (geographic coordinates: 39.8252N, 78.5501E) claimed by ASPI, is actually a logistics park in Bachu county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang. -The "detention center" (geographic coordinates: 38.9046N, 77.6153E) claimed by ASPI, is actually a middle school in Markit county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang.
    1
  14834.  @yslee1401  "Xinjiang-concentration camps disguised as rehabilitation centres." Another myth. People have visited the geographical coordinates corresponding to the sites from satellite pictures and found them to be schools, dormitories, elderly folk homes, and other civilian structures. The "detention center" (geographic coordinates: 38.8367N, 77.7056E) claimed by ASPI, is actually an old folks home in Markit county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang. The "detention center" (geographic coordinates: 38.9950N, 77.6682E) claimed by ASPI, is actually an elementary school in Yantaq township, Markit county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang. The "detention center" (geographic coordinates: 39.8252N, 78.5501E) claimed by ASPI, is actually a logistics park in Bachu county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang. The "detention center" (geographic coordinates: 38.9046N, 77.6153E) claimed by ASPI, is actually a middle school in Markit county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang.
    1
  14835.  @yslee1401  "Xinjiang-concentration camps disguised as rehabilitation centres." Another myth. People have visited the geographica coordinates corresponding to the sites from satellite pictures and found them to be schools, dormitories, elderly folk homes, and other civilian structures. -Coordinates: (38.8367N, 77.7056E) is actually an old folks home in Markit county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang. -Coordinates: (38.9950N, 77.6682E) is actually an elementary school in Yantaq township, Markit county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang. -Coordinates: (39.8252N, 78.5501E) is actually a logistics park in Bachu county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang. -Coordinates: (38.9046N, 77.6153E) is actually a middle school in Markit county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang.
    1
  14836.  @yslee1401  "Xinjiang-concentration camps disguised as rehabilitation centres." Another myth. People have visited the geographical coordinates corresponding to the sites from satellite pictures and found them to be schools, dormitories, elderly folk homes, and other civilian structures. -Coordinates: (38.8367, 77.7056) is actually an old folks home. -Coordinates: (38.9950, 77.6682) is actually an elementary school. -Coordinates: (39.8252, 78.5501) is actually a logistics park. -Coordinates: (38.9046, 77.6153) is actually a middle school.
    1
  14837.  @yslee1401  Tibet was historically part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongolians conquered the Kingdom of Thibet and also Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. Manchurian conquerors did the same thing centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Tibet briefly broke free of China in 1912, but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951. Today, countries all over the world acknowledge that Tibet is part of the People's Republic of China.
    1
  14838.  @yslee1401  Even the BBC report on Xinjiang showed that the trainees in the vocational training centers are allowed to take the weekends off to go home and be with their families. The government even charter buses to pick up the trainees and send them home (which may be located several kilometers away in remote regions, given that this is Xinjiang we are talking about)
    1
  14839.  @chenalyx  Agreed. BBC even resorted to using a filter lens while reporting on China, making the trees in China look less green and giving the sky in China an eerie colour.
    1
  14840. China don't mind sharing rulership of the world with others through global governance. But it is USA that insists on maintaining its global hegemony.
    1
  14841.  @Hanabis924  It just goes to show that despite how some people boast about freedoms in the West, they still require vaccine mandates whereas China doesn't have such a vaccine mandate, contrary to popular opinion in the West.
    1
  14842.  @Hanabis924  Why don't you outright name these "coercive ways" rather than just making insinuations about China without proof? The fact remains that China did not impose a vaccine mandate (which is why many elderly are vaccinated) whereas you can't say the same about Canadian truckers being slapped with a vaccine mandate. "Bank accounts were frozen because of dark money possibly coming from the United States. It's potential fraudulent transactions." So you're saying that Canadians had their accounts frozen based on "potential" fraud? In other words, the crime itself is unproven? Isn't that alarming for a country like Canada that prides itself on freedoms and rule of law? "You are making it sound like every trucker had their bank accounts frozen." I did say "purportedly," I never said that every trucker had their bank accounts frozen. But shouldn't those Canadian truckers have the right to protest under their constitution, without having their bank accounts frozen based on unproven crimes?
    1
  14843.  @Hanabis924  Could you outright name these "coercive ways" rather than just making insinuations about China without proof? The fact remains that China did not impose a vaccine mandate whereas you can't say the same about Canadian truckers being slapped with a vaccine mandate. "Bank accounts were frozen because of dark money possibly coming from the United States. It's potential fraudulent transactions." So you're saying that Canadians had their accounts frozen based on "potential" fraud? In other words, the crime itself is unproven?
    1
  14844.  @Hanabis924  Perhaps you could outright name these "coercive ways" that you said earlier, rather than just making insinuations about China without proof? "So it isn't just frozen without notice." I never said it was frozen without notice, I said it was frozen even though their crimes are unproven?
    1
  14845. But Taiwan is not recognized as another nation by many UN countries (including USA) so China will be engaging in a civil war that's all. If USA intervenes, then the USA will be disrupting an internal civil war of China and would be regarded as the aggressor.
    1
  14846. IoC already shown that Peng Shuai is fine and that she wants her personal privacy to be respected. But the WTA is behaving like the paparazzi and demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see.
    1
  14847.  @vcerocks3287  "神州 Shenzhou Oh really I wonder how much privacy she wished when she went public with the sexual assault/harassment allegations." Could you point out Peng Shuai's sexual assault allegations? I read Peng Shuai's translated post on Reddit, and she has had a tumultuous, on-and-off relation with a much older man, spanning several years, but could you point me to the allegations of sexual assault in her post? And it turns out Peng Shuai wrote an email to WTA, explaining that the allegations of sexual assault aren't true, and she criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    1
  14848.  @ventorix  Singapore is finally closing schools and most workplaces. Source: Singapore to Close Schools, Most Workplaces With Rising Virus Cases bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-03/singapore-pm-says-more-steps-coming-on-virus-lee-speaks-at-4pm Singapore will impose stricter measures, that will include closing most workplaces and move to full home-based learning in schools, amid rising cases of local coronavirus infections.
    1
  14849. "The West is an Empire of Lies" - Vladimir Putin
    1
  14850. China's "expanding field of influence" is facilitating the global transition towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, rather than the uni-polar world dominated by a single voice, that of the U.S and their allies.
    1
  14851.  @Dip-t1q  Cyrus Janssen's videos have the message of Building Bridges, Not Walls between the U.S and China, and that if the U.S and China both cooperate, the whole world benefits. Are you saying that the Chinese government supports this positive message? Then isn't it a good thing for the world?
    1
  14852.  @Dip-t1q  Cyrus Janssen's videos have the message of Building Bridges, Not Walls between the U.S and China, and that if the U.S and China both cooperate, the whole world benefits. So you're saying that the CPC endorses this positive message?
    1
  14853.  @seekthetruth1478  The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is not an official UN agency, it only shares the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Therefore, China reserves the right not to adhere to the PCA's ruling, given that it's not an official UN agency.
    1
  14854.  @seekthetruth1478  Have you actually been to Tibet Autonomous Region and seen what life is like there for yourself?
    1
  14855.  @stunningandbrave2520  You said: "Wait, you don't adhere to UNCLOS." China is a signatory to UNCLOS and ratifies it. However, the United States does NOT ratify UNCLOS then what gives the U.S the right to claim Freedom of Navigation operations in the name of UNCLOS, when it doesn't even ratify that document?
    1
  14856.  @stunningandbrave2520  "lol Tibet is practically Han population now." The population of the Tibet Autonomous Region consists of 86% Tibetan, 12.2% Han and 0.8% others, so how is it practically Han population now?
    1
  14857.  @seekthetruth1478  "China was one of the first countries that signed UNCLOS in December 1982, and ratified the Convention in 1996" China ratified UNCLOS but China also made a clear declaration in accordance with the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea in 2006 to exclude compulsory arbitration on sovereign disputes and maritime delimitation. Many countries including the United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, France, Canada, and Spain had made similar declarations to reject any of the procedures in Article 298 of UNCLOS. The United States does NOT ratify UNCLOS yet the US conducts so-called Freedom of Navigation operations in the name of UNCLOS, when they don't even ratify it?
    1
  14858.  @stunningandbrave2520  "Search for "taiwan straight international waters"." Search for a "Map of International Waters". There is No map of international waters/high seas, that marks the Taiwan Strait as international waters. Even the South China Sea is not included as part of international waters in any maps of this sorrt.
    1
  14859.  @stunningandbrave2520  Search for a "Map of International Waters". There is No map of international waters/high seas, that marks the Taiwan Strait as international waters.
    1
  14860.  @stunningandbrave2520  Look up "international waters" and those maps do not mark the Taiwan Strait as international waters.
    1
  14861.  @stunningandbrave2520  "Then what is China doing there? Get out and leave them alone." The Taiwan Strait is a 180-kilometer (110 mi; 97 nmi)-wide strait and falls within mainland China's exclusive economic zone, since it's within 200 nautical miles of the mainland's shoreline. So why can't China be within our EEZ?
    1
  14862.  @stunningandbrave2520  You said: "This position has drawn strong objections from the United States, Australia, France and Taiwan."" US, Australia and Taiwan Island all consider the island as part of China. During his visit to Beijing, the US Diplomat Anthony Blinken reiterated the US position on the One China principle, saying that the US does not support Taiwan independence.
    1
  14863.  @HarrySerpanos  China's interests is in mutual development. If other countries benefit from development then their middle class grows and could become a potential market for Chinese products. It certainly differs from the US's zero sum game approach.
    1
  14864.  @drezzy5  China also built a great deal of the world you live in today.
    1
  14865.  @floras2030  What makes you think Chinese vaccines are ineffective? China has two vaccines that have been approved by the World Health Organization so why should China ask the West for "help"? I mean, look at the surge in Omicron cases in the United States, threatening to overwhelm their healthcare system, yet you're saying China should ask for help from the West? China has actually done a better job in containing the coronavirus and limiting the number of deaths compared to USA. USA has only 4% of the world's population, yet they are home to 25% of the world's Covid cases and Covid deaths.
    1
  14866.  @floras2030  Sinovac offers 94% efficacy against the Omicron variant after the 3rd booster shot. Research has shown that the vaccine had doubled the neutralising antibody positive rate against the Omicron variant. And New Zealand also has a zero COVID policy, they literally entered lockdown after detecting 1 Covid-19 case, then can't China do the same? Look at the surge in the United States in the number of Covid-19 cases, threatening to overwhelm their healthcare system, and can you imagine the same thing happening in China? Then can't China take necessary precautions to curb the spread of Covid-19 in our country?
    1
  14867.  @floras2030  What makes you think I'm being paid to post here? I cite statistics to support my argument, but you just dismiss my points altogether. If you want to talk about prison populations, then it's actually America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons.
    1
  14868. Washing another's feet is culture that's practiced (even in the Christian Bible) so how can culture be degrading?
    1
  14869.  S. Young  Yes. Foreigners often say that China lacks culture, but how exactly? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history.
    1
  14870.  S. Young  Yes. Many of these China-heaters/bashers have probably themselves never set foot in China and see what life is like here for themselves.
    1
  14871. Japan and South Korea are reluntant to join on board the U.S's CHIPS act.
    1
  14872.  @xpro2009  You said: "A lifestyle choice. More than cultural; the benefits and convenience of modern ways/methods and technology." China is a modern nation with all the convenience of technology such as smartphones (i.e Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, etc), social media (i.e WeChat, Weibo, Douyin, Bilibili), mobile payment (i.e Alipay and WeChat pay), Internet companies (i.e Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, ByteDance, etc) and even electric vehicles (i.e BYD, Geely, SAIC Motor, etc). China is even home to the world's largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Passengers can ride on a train travelling up to 350 kmph and even balance a coin on its edge on the window sill and the coin will not topple for a long time. This is a testament to China's advancement in high-speed technology. But where are all the famous companies from the Philippines in comparison? If anything, it boils down to the "colonial mentality" that's effectively holding back the people of the Philippines.
    1
  14873.  @xpro2009  "And so are the surveillance system with social credit scoring." Surveillance in China is necessary because China has such a huge population at 1.4 billion people, whereas the police force in China is only around 3.6 million (2018) which equated to rate of 258 officers per 100k population in China. That's below the international median of 300 officers per 100k according to UN, so by implementing surveillance system, it helps ease the shortage of officers needed to monitor the public and maintain order. Thanks to the surveillance system and advanced facial recognition system, the crime rate in China has fallen drastically, and people feel safe to walk around the streets in China. Even girls can walk around safely at night at 3 am in the cities. As for the Social Credit system, it's just a myth. Closest equivalent is a credit rating for people wishing to apply for credit cards (much like the rest of the world) which is based on a person's finances. But there's no such system tied to "social credit".
    1
  14874.  @xpro2009  "And so are the surveillance system with social credit scoring." Surveillance in China is necessary because China has such a huge population at 1.4 billion people, whereas the police force in China is only around 3.6 million (2018) which equated to rate of 258 officers per 100k population in China. That's below the international median of 300 officers per 100k according to UN, so by implementing surveillance system, it helps ease the shortage of officers needed to monitor the public and maintain order. Thanks to the surveillance system and advanced facial recognition system, the crime rate in China has fallen drastically, and people feel safe to walk around the streets in China. Even girls can walk around safely at night at 3 am in the cities. As for the Social Credit system, it's doesn't actually exist. Closest equivalent is a credit rating for people wishing to apply for credit cards (much like the rest of the world) which is based on a person's finances. But there's no such system tied to "social credit".
    1
  14875. +Leroy Jenkins Japan is bound by 1945 WW2 surrender treaty never to declare war against another country, except in self defense. Besides China has North Korea to defend against South Korea and Japan, and unlike those countries, NK is a nuclear capable country. US mainland is difficult to invade, but China has worlds longest range ICBM, the DF-41, with an operational range betweem 12,000 KM and 15,00 KM, surpassing the range of the US LGM-30 Minuteman which has a reported range of 13,000 km. Here is a video animation of the DF-41. Video:China missile tests DF-41 launch from railroad train youtube.com/watch?v=h2kjMctT8yU
    1
  14876.  @nigelhaywood9753  What parallel reality? I've provided evidence to support my arguments, but you (like that Raumance guy) just dismiss my points without citing any support for your own argument.
    1
  14877.  @ThatBigBlackClock  According to a report entitled Peace in Ukraine, authored by former UN Secretary General and published by Brave New Europe. On March 28, Putin, as a sign of goodwill and in support of the peace negotiations, declared readiness to withdraw troops from the Kharkov area and the Kiev area; this apparently occurred even before his public announcement.
    1
  14878.  @Raumance  The US-led invasion of Iraq (a sovereign country) has been deemed illegal by the then UN Secretary General Kofi Annan. "I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN charter. From our point of view and from the charter point of view it was illegal." - UN Secretary General Kofi Annan.
    1
  14879.  @nigelhaywood9753  Just because they specifically asked, doesn't mean that they have to join. Russia perceives Nato's eastward expansion as a threat. Much like how during the Cold War, the US would not tolerate Soviet Union missiles in Cuba (i.e Cuban Missile Crisis).
    1
  14880.  @tanyaforostyan7069  "Shenzhou. go back to your textbooks to figure out when Luhansk and Donetsk was invaded by ruzzia before writing none sense." Luhansk and Donetsk were literally PART of Russia since the Russian Empire. The two oblasts were also part of the Soviet Union. After the 2014 Maidan uprising, Luhansk and Donetsk had a referendum in which the majority in the two oblasts supported independence, but Ukraine countered by shelling Donbas, resulting in estimated 13,000 killed in the two oblasts, according to UN figures.
    1
  14881.  @Raumance  "Shenzhou. That has nothing to do with Russia invading Ukraine." Neither has Hitler anything to do with Putin, but you suddenly brought up "Shenzhou. Hitler invaded into sovereign nations." then can't I bring up the US-led invasion of Iraq?
    1
  14882.  @ThatBigBlackClock  "Shenzhou. Youre quting a former UN General report while all the quote says is "Putin declared" followed by some completely BS story." I've quoting a report by people present on the ground during the Ukrainian-Russian peace negotiations in March 2022. You're quoting a report by American think-tank that is far away from the conflict in Ukraine and wasn't there during peace negotiations. Yet you dismiss my source while expecting me to somehow believe yours? Like your first objective: 1. Russian forces have not abandoned their objective to encircle and capture Kyiv, but it's apparent that Russia has given up on this objective. Where's your evidence that they haven't?
    1
  14883. ​ @Raumance  Brave New Europe published a report entitled: Peace For Ukraine, authored by a former UN Assistant Secretary-General which indicates that Putin withdrew their forces from Kiev as a gesture of goodwill. On March 28, Putin, as a sign of goodwill and in support of the peace negotiations, declared readiness to withdraw troops from the Kharkov area and the Kiev area; this apparently occurred even before his public announcement. ... (Source: Brave New Europe: Peace For Ukraine).
    1
  14884.  @Raumance  "Shenzhou. Yes Hitler's promise to not attack the Soviet Union is directly related to your naivety about just believing what people say without ability to think if it's true." No it's not. Because like I said, Hitler is NOT Putin, and the Soviet Union clearly fought against the Nazis during WWII, so how does your logic even hold water? You're saying that just because Person A said something to Person B, it means Person B, Person C, etc, are like Person A? How does this make sense?
    1
  14885.  @tanyaforostyan7069  " Also there was no “goodwill” in russian withdrawal from Kiev...WHAT evidence???" On March 28, Putin, as a sign of goodwill and in support of the peace negotiations, declared readiness to withdraw troops from the Kharkov area and the Kiev area; this apparently occurred even before his public announcement. ... (Source: Brave New Europe: Peace For Ukraine).
    1
  14886.  @nigelhaywood9753  What in the world makes you think I enjoy being called naive? They resort to hurling personal insults against me for my views, just because my views happen to differ from theirs. I've lost count of the number of times I cited a report by Brave New World: Peace For Ukraine where it's stated that Putin withdrew Russian forces from Kiev as a gesture of goodwill and in support of the peace negotiations. This report was authored by 3 people: -Michael von der Schulenburg, a former UN Assistant Secretary-General, who worked for over 34 years for the United Nations, and shortly for the OSCE, in many countries in war or internal armed conflicts often involving fragile governments and armed non-state actors. -Hajo Funke, Professor Emeritus for political sciences of the Otto-Suhr-Institute/ Freie University Berlin. -General (ret.) Harald Kujat, the highest ranging German officer of the Bundeswehr and at NATO. Are they also calling these 3 people naive then?
    1
  14887.  @nigelhaywood9753  What in the world makes you think I enjoy being called naive? They resort to hurling personal insults against me for my views, just because my views happen to differ from theirs. I've lost count of the number of times I cited a report by Brave New World: Peace For Ukraine where it's stated that Putin withdrew Russian forces from Kiev as a gesture of goodwill and in support of the peace negotiations.
    1
  14888. Even the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14889. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  14890. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14891. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  14892. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14893. 我觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  14894.  @immi8419  "Dont get my wrong i love China but this guy is too positive, but thats how he makes his money so i understand" If that's really how he makes his money, then why does Cyrus still have to include sponsors in his video?
    1
  14895.  @immi8419  "but most of my Russian friends are really not positive about it, and none of them want to live there." Russians living in the Global North face various forms of discrimination, whether they are Russian ballet dancers, music composers, orchestra conductors, artists, chess players, tennis players, etc. They get banned from performances, competitions, sports events, are their lives really better outside of Russia?
    1
  14896.  @immi8419  You're only talking about "the ones you know" but that doesn't account for all the Russians living outside of Russia. Let me give you an example. Russians residing or travelling through Germany are having their vehicles seized by the authorities.
    1
  14897.  @immi8419  Had Cyrus Janssen been truly "making money" posting such videos about China, then won't he make a lot more money by posting videos that reflect the mainstream narrative and gain tons of followers?
    1
  14898. +Gregor Jerman China claimed the Spratly Islands when Republic of China published the 11 Dash Line in 1947. Philippines was independent in 1946, and the Americans reminded them that the Spratlys was not Philippine territory as outlined in the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America. Look, even the Americans supported China's claim back then. Also, when ROC published 11 Dash Line back in 1947, there weren't any discoveries of oil deposits and other natural resources in SCS, so why did you claim China changed suddenly after founding out? China claimed SCS islands in 1947, without knowledge of the resources within that area.
    1
  14899. +rider23332 I'm not acting tough. During the Korean War, Chinese PLA troops were mostly poorly trained conscripts, our weapons were crappy, our supply lines overextended, our air and naval support non-existent, and we only had North Korean troops for allies. Whereas South Korea had the combined might of USA, UK, Canada, France, Australia, Turkey, +10 other countries. Their troops were well trained, well equipped, had access to air and naval support, and with Japan providing logistical support nearby. Yet the combined armies of 16 countries still FAILED to defeat China and N. Korea? With our crappy equipment and poor training? With only N. Korean troops for allies?
    1
  14900. Many Westerners rather give credit to Chinese people rather than give credit to the government for lifting millions of people out of poverty.
    1
  14901.  @jansg405  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  14902.  @jansg405  Because China is the world's most populous country at 1.4 billion people, so obviously there will be more people migrating out of China than into China. Just like India, the world's 2nd most populous country, the most immigrants in the world often come from China and India.
    1
  14903.  @jansg405  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  14904.  @hyc1266  It's a duopoly then, instead of a monopoly. Look at American smartphone makers, Apple has eliminated all the smaller American competitions. Whereas China has smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html
    1
  14905.  @hyc1266  Then there's Amazon, Facebook and other American monopolies. Yes, perhaps no smaller American companies can afford to sue them but I heard Google is being sued for anti-competitive practices.
    1
  14906. It's quite possible that the ordinary American has no power to stop the U.S going to war. It's American leaders that arbitrarily decided to send lethal aid to Ukraine, the ordinary American didn't even get to vote on what happens to their taxpayers money being sent to one of Europe's most corrupt countries. The ones who can avert war are most likely the people of Taiwan, more of whom need to wake up and realize that the U.S doesn't care about democracy in the island as long as they can use it to contain the mainland's rise.
    1
  14907. It's quite possible that the ordinary American has no power to stop the U.S going to war. The ones who can avert war are most likely the people of Taiwan, more of whom need to wake up and realize that the U.S doesn't care about democracy in the island as long as they can use it to contain the mainland's rise.
    1
  14908. The ones who can truly avert war are most likely the people of Taiwan, more of whom need to wake up and realize that the U.S doesn't care about democracy in the island as long as they can use it to contain the mainland's rise.
    1
  14909. The ones who can truly avert war are most likely the people of Taiwan, more of whom need to wake up and realize that the U.S doesn't care about the island as long as they can use it to contain the mainland's rise.
    1
  14910. It's quite possible that the ordinary American has no power to stop the U.S going to war. It's American leaders that arbitrarily decided to send lethal aid to Ukraine, the ordinary American didn't even get to vote on what happens to their taxpayers money being sent to one of Europe's most corrupt countries.
    1
  14911. It's American leaders that arbitrarily decided to send lethal aid to Ukraine, the ordinary American didn't even get to vote on what happens to their taxpayers money being sent to one of Europe's most corrupt countries.
    1
  14912. Indians will also exclaim "Jai Hind" too in their own language.
    1
  14913.  @4637812648  The guy above me mentioned Snowden and Julian Assange so why don't you go after him then for mentioning American dissidents?
    1
  14914. @Eric Lee According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china
    1
  14915. @Allen Janco USA has history of recession from Great Depression to 2008 Financial Crisis. And with regards to Covid-19, USA has has surpassed China in number of Covid-19 cases with over 80,000 cases and a huge economic toll on American families with a record 3.2 million filing for unemployment benefits. Video: US Cases Of Coronavirus Pass China As Unemployment Claims Rise youtu.be/XB-ZQpC42EQ
    1
  14916.  @iswearshewas1866  China did not create the virus, the Wuhan virology lab conspiracy has long been debunked by experts. Source: The Wuhan Virus Is Not a Lab-Made Bioweapon foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/29/coronavirus-china-lab-mortality-virology-wuhan-virus-not-bioweapon/
    1
  14917.  @4637812648  The US is now the new epicentre of the global coronavirus pandemic and had more Covid-19 cases than any other nation, even ground zero China. Video: US now has world's most coronavirus cases, surpassing China youtu.be/A8v3GYnlXww 85,505 people in the USA were infected with Covid-19, and at least 1,288 died as of 27th March 27. New research suggests the disease could take more than 80,000 lives in the country. The daily death toll could soar to 2,300 as the US epidemic hits its peak, possibly in April. The outbreak is also ravaging the US economy.
    1
  14918.  @abarrolugos8818  Is there something wrong with me using VPN?
    1
  14919.  @abarrolugos8818  Here's a look inside Chinese BYD mask factory. Video: China: Factory produces 5 million masks a day in bid to supply shortfall youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw
    1
  14920.  @abarrolugos8818  This factory in the eastern Chinese city of Rizhao (日照) has been busy pumping out 3,000,000 masks a day. Video: Inside China's Biggest Mask Factory youtu.be/Gc074FxOBA4?t=11
    1
  14921.  @nikmon3591  China is donating medical supplies to other countries affected by Covid-19. Video: Jack Ma donates 500,000 coronavirus testing kits and 1,000,000 masks to the US youtu.be/t4it58bem6I Video: Chinese donate half a million masks to Italy to aid coronavirus fight youtu.be/tQQa7RUKXzs Video: Chinese donate 70,000 masks to Japan to aid coronavirus fight youtu.be/cYkYHauUmwo Video: 300,000 China-donated masks arrive in Belgium youtu.be/B0oxcoh9rDo
    1
  14922.  @nikmon3591  Some of China's medical supplies are donations while others are purchased, so why are you deliberately writing them all off as selling? And masks are in high demand right now, you expect China to just keep on donating masks until we run dry? About the faulty test kits to Spain, China has offered Spain a list of approved Chinese suppliers to buy from, but Spain choose to buy from unapproved company, Bioeasy which wasn't on the list of approved vendors. So why blame China when Spain choose to buy from unapproved company not on the list of approved Chinese vendors? Video: Spain: 'Flawed' test kits weren't purchased directly from China youtu.be/OaXc-e1_E_8
    1
  14923.  @nikmon3591  "Oh sorry china that they didn't leave their priorities in treating and protecting their citizens.." The Chinese government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and halt production, closing tourists attractions, banning mass gatherings, imposing lockdowns all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and combat the coronavirus. Now its finally paying off that the virus is under control in China and we are cautiously reopening our economy. But in Western countries like US and UK, their economies are far too precious to sacrifice so human health has to be sacrificed instead. Trump wants to reopen the country by Easter and Boris Johnson is relying on "herd immunity" to pull through. So human lives have to be sacrificed instead of the economy.
    1
  14924.  @nikmon3591  Why don't you explain why USA hijacked a shipment of medical supplies bound for Germany from China, if you look down on Chinese faulty medical supplies? Video: German Official: US hijacked supply of masks in Bangkok youtu.be/7_58an4yIhw
    1
  14925.  @kriszy15  China has lifted 700 million people out of poverty in just 40 years, whereas the whole rest of the world only lifted 150 million by comparison. Video: Historical achievement: Take 700 million out of poverty youtu.be/CljWffPgmG8 "China has lifted 728 million people out of poverty by international standards. The whole rest of the world has only lifted 152 million." - John Ross, Well-known columnist in UK, Former Deputy mayor of London.
    1
  14926.  @risegursv5925  UNESCO and World Bank are international organisations so what's wrong with my quoting their statistics? Wikipedia also quote from those international organisations, so if you don't believe Wikipedia then go to their official website then. Source: UNESCO Sites in China - China - UNESCO World Heritage Centre whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/CN Source: World Bank China worldbank.org/en/country/china
    1
  14927.  @risegursv5925  "神州 Shenzhou Do you say UNO" Did I ever said anything about UNO?
    1
  14928.  @kriszy15  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china
    1
  14929.  @kriszy15  My Wikipedia source stems from the World Bank itself, here's the data directly from the World Bank. Source: Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day (2011 PPP) (% of population) - China data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.DDAY?locations=CN I given you facts and figures detailing China's poverty alleviation efforts, you just refuse to believe that China lifted 700 million out of poverty by international standards, because you're anti-China that's all. Video: How China lifted 700 Million out of Poverty - Africa can do it too youtu.be/yeo_bzbrrmo
    1
  14930.  @kriszy15  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    1
  14931.  @stunningandbrave2520  Why should China do that? China knows that if Russia falls, then NATO will have China next in its sights.
    1
  14932.  @miliba  Because Western anti-China propaganda is deliberately painting negative image of China and "demonising" our country, which is why China needs to keep Western anti-China mediation out.
    1
  14933.  18.Siddhant kumar  Why hasn't India (world's largest democracy) surpassed China yet? Have Indians asked themselves this question, instead of picking on China?
    1
  14934.  @azn898  How is the CPC responsible for all worldwide Covid-19 deaths? Your Western countries failed to take necessary precautions and are blaming China for Western government's catastrophic failure to contain the Covid-19 in their lands, when China has been successful in containing the coronavirus situation?
    1
  14935.  @miliba  The Communist Party of China has transformed China from a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  14936.  18.Siddhant kumar  What makes you think democracy is the best form of government? If democracy doesn't seem to work for your country, would you be inclined to try an alternative system of government? In the past, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country under the so-called "democratic" Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) but today under the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 (1949~) China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. Whereas India is still struggling under Western brand of democracy. If a political system doesn't seem to work, why not try out an alternative form of government instead?
    1
  14937.  18.Siddhant kumar  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of high-speed railway lines Why hasn't India's infrastructure matched up to China's? The Indian trains are overloaded, passengers sit on the roof or hang by the sides.
    1
  14938.  18.Siddhant kumar   Look at Wikipedia: List of railway accidents and incidents in India and the trains in India can derail and injure/kill passengers and Indian government don't care.
    1
  14939.  18.Siddhant kumar  Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time.
    1
  14940. youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE
    1
  14941.  @johnj2587  How else to lift our people out of poverty? Chinese laborers have been saving up millions of pennies over the decades, to eventually lift millions of people out of poverty into the middle class. Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that the cost of living in America is kept lower than it should be. Think about the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent elsewhere on things like cars, housing, luxury brands, rent, tuition fees, and so on. Isn't that why many Americans flock to Walmart because of their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money to spend elsewhere?
    1
  14942.  @johnj2587  What makes you seem to think Winnie the Pooh t-shirts are somehow banned in China? If you search Chinese online shopping websites like Taobao for Winnie the Pooh (小熊维尼) merchandise, they are available for purchase on Taobao. Here's the search entry for Winnie the Pooh (小熊维尼) on Taobao: taobao.com/list/product/%E5%B0%8F%E7%86%8A%E7%BB%B4%E5%B0%BC.htm
    1
  14943.  @johnj2587  Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? There's even a Winnie the Pooh ride in Shanghai Disneyland, yet you thought Winnie the Pooh was banned in China?
    1
  14944.  @johnj2587  Before the communist revolution in China, the peasants worked like slaves on the fields that the rich landlords (the Kuomintang) taxed peasants heavily. Peasants had no rights to own land or to send their kids to school, and under the so-called "democratic" Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949), China was dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past. But after the communist revolution, Mao Zedong and the communists seized the lands from the corrupt landlords and redistributed it to the dirt-poor peasants. For the first time, peasants were given access to education, women were granted equal rights to education and our lifespans improved drastically under Chairman Mao. Today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  14945.  @johnj2587  In China, the top students (or top 5%) from every school in China are selected to join the Communist Party of China and contribute their brainpower to the Chinese government. Once they join the party they are put on probation for 1 year, before becoming a full-fledged communist member and advancing through the ranks by garnering votes from other politically experienced communist members. Whereas in the USA, someone with no political experience (like Donald Trump) can become a President of the United States, so how's such a system a good political system? Why not let people who know how to govern, govern? That's what China is doing.
    1
  14946.  @miliba  "神州 Shenzhou Do you know that simply being on Youtube is deeply offending your commie government?" Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    1
  14947.  @johnj2587  Every peasant family in China has their own lands that belong to them, after the communists seized those lands from corrupt landlords and redistributed it to the dirt-poor peasants. Every Chinese family has a laojia 老家 (old home/family) that we can return to, so what makes you think land wasn't given to the poor? And throughout China there are numerous nail houses 钉子户 where the homeowner refuse to sell their home, and the government just leaves them alone and just develop the surrounding regions. So what makes you seem to think farmers are forced off their property (property given to them by the communists after the communist revolution)? Source: China's nail houses: the homeowners who refuse to make way – in pictures theguardian.com/cities/gallery/2014/apr/15/china-nail-houses-in-pictures-property-development
    1
  14948.  @johnj2587  "Also only select family are part of top brass in CCP." Communist members are selected based on meritocracy (being promoted or demoted according to deeds/merit) not by family relations, what are you talking about? And the bottom 95% weren't the top-scorers in our schools so they'll have to find some other means to join the communist party if they want to participate in politics. Unless you have demonstrated good knowledge, then you won't be allowed to participate in political decision-making, its only the top minds of every school gets selected to join the communist party. President Xi Jinping has shown to be a strong and competent leader, capable of guiding China through the Covid-19 pandemic and emerging victorious, then why can't he be allowed to govern China? Competent people should govern China, not like in USA where a candidate with zero political experience (like Trump) can become president and decide the fate of Americans.
    1
  14949. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14950. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  14951. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14952. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14953. Even the United States recognizes that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14954. Even the USA acknowledges the One China policy that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14955. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14956. Even the United States acknowledges the One China policy that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14957. Even the USA acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14958. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  14959.  @niaMah1363  He yawns because he's pretending to be asleep since he cannot face the truth. Nothing will wake up someone who is pretending to be asleep.
    1
  14960.  @paulfri1569  If that's really the case, then why aren't poor European migrants included as well? European miners were granted access to gold mines, while the colonial authorities levied a special tax on Chinese immigrants and from which other immigrants were exempted. How were the Chinese immigrants poor if they could afford to pay those taxes?
    1
  14961.  @paulfri1569  "神州 Shenzhou Red China has protectionism like this today" The United States is the most protectionist country in the world. According to data from Global Trade Alert, the US has taken over 800 protectionist measures since 2008, and the European Union has over 300 protectionist measures, while China is only in the range of 200-300. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Protectionism)
    1
  14962.  @perrychrispy1  China is home to worlds largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world-class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented with balancing small objects on their edges, like coins, smartphones, pens, etc, in a train traveling at 350 kph and the objects remained undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period. Here is a video of the experiment. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE
    1
  14963.  @gusdamro  Who do you think you are to say who won and who lost? You mean I have to acknowledge all his points? I have shown that authoritarian regimes like Soviet Union had innovation such as launching the first satellite Sputnik-1, the first man in space, Russian Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, and the first space station, Salyut-1. And he also says ridiculous things like the entire concept of Superheroes like Iron Man and Batman only could’ve been invented in a free thinking society. Superheroes existed long before America was even born. The first known superhero tale was probably Gilgamesh from the Epic of Gilgamesh, an ancient Mesopotamian poem. China also had the Romance of the Three Kingdoms 《三国演义》featuring heroic figures like Liu Bei, Guan Yu, and so on. So its pure arrogance to assume that USA gave birth to superheroes isn't it? Or that superheroes can only be created in a free-thinking society. Why don't you help him to refute my points if you think his points are valid?
    1
  14964.  @KuangWen0  If you really know history like I do then you should know that under Chairman Mao, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Life expectancy at birth under Mao nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980, and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al. 1984; Coale1984; Jamison 1984; Banister 1987; Ravallion 1997; Banister and Hill). Infant and child mortality rate was halved under Mao. Illiteracy rate in China was halved under Mao. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%, and they have been steadily decreasing since. China’s literacy success has been described as “perhaps the single greatest educational effort in human history” (Peterson, 1997). These are the statistics that show how Chairman Mao came about to be respected by the people of China. It's mostly the overseas Chinese that hold a negative opinion of our founding father, because they don't understand the true extent of what Mao Zedong did for China. If not for Mao, China today would most likely still be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves like during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period, instead of of the strong unified country we are today as the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳. For this reason, I will always respect Mao Zedong for the sacrifices he did for China.
    1
  14965.  @KuangWen0  我哪里没有逻辑?你自己能提到四小龙来跟中国比,那我为什么不能提到国民党时期? You yourself bring up the Four Dragons for comparison, then why can't I do the same with the Nationalist Kuomintang period? I've even explained the reasoning China's GDP per capita is smaller than the Four Dragons is because we have the largest population in the world, so if you divide our GDP by our enormous population, then of course China's GDP per capita is lower. So how am I not using logic?
    1
  14966.  @KuangWen0  没人说人口少GDP就高，你连GDP人均都算不清楚，而且你楼上不是把四小龙跟中国比吗？四小龙，菲律宾，缅甸，越南的人口都比不过中国只有印度能算在眼里。我国和印度同为世界上人口最多的国家之一，都有着古老的文明。如果你说印度改革开放，为什么还没跟中国追到？ 我已经说了毛时代创造了人均寿命增长的世界奇迹。按照世界银行公布的数据，1960年中印两国人民的预期寿命相近，但在那个十年时代，中国的预期寿命突然大幅度增长，很快大幅度超过印度。据统计,1949年前中国人寿平均数是35岁，世界人寿平均数是47岁。1949年-1976年,毛泽东时代短短27年，中国人寿平均数提高到65岁，世界人寿平均数是57岁。据统计,1949年前中国人寿平均数是35岁，世界人寿平均数是47岁。1949年-1976年,毛泽东时代短短27年，中国人寿平均数提高到65岁，世界人寿平均数是57岁。 也就是说，中国人，在毛泽东时代，从比世界平均少活12年，提高到比世界平均多获8年。12+8=20，也就是说，在毛泽东时代，中国人均寿命，相对国际平均水平，提高了20岁！外国人可以不去捏造事实和杜撰神话，可以更全面地了解毛泽东在中国得到人民广泛支持的原因——抛开诸如取得真正的民族独立等问题，而只是从生存这一事实来考虑。如果有人能够让你多活31年，那么毫无疑问，他值得你尊重！
    1
  14967.  @KuangWen0  中国一些所谓的知识分子也亦步亦趋紧跟西方步伐妖魔化毛泽东。但事实显示，1949-1976年中国取得了人类史上最伟大的社会成就。西方试图掩盖中国1949-1976年所取得的史无前例的社会成就的方法，是一种典型的扭曲手法，即以一些个例扭曲整体形势。比如，著有《毛泽东时代的大饥荒》的荷兰学者冯克（Frank Dikotter）就据此称毛泽东时代的中国为“人间地狱”，但事实证明，现实与其说法截然相反。人类史上从未有如此多的人如中国1949-1976年所做的一样，如此快速地提高其社会地位。 比较中国与另一个最大的发展中经济体——印度的预期寿命趋势，1947年，印度取得独立，当时该国人口的预期寿命为32岁。中国人在1949年新中国成立时的预期寿命为35岁——比印度高出3岁。到了1978年，中国改革前的最后一年，中国人的预期寿命为67岁，印度为55岁——差距扩大到12岁。差距明显加大并不是因为印度的表现糟糕——预期寿命在32年中增长了22岁，而是因为中国的表现极为出色——预期寿命在29年中提高了32岁。这意味着，在改革前，中国人的预期寿命每年增加1岁多——年均增幅高达2.3%。 需要指出的是，与人类历史上的其他主要国家相比，中国在1949年后的30年中的预期寿命增长率是最快的。我们可以举例说明： 在1880年后的30年中，美国每年预期寿命增幅为0.9%（主要是受内战后恢复的推动，在一段时间内出现急剧增长）。 在1871年后，英国的预期寿命出现了一段快速增长时期，其每年增幅不到1.0%。 日本预期寿命的增长较为显著，而且是在二战后经济恢复中实现快速增长的国家，在1947年后的29年中，预期寿命的年均增幅为1.3%。 因此，中国在1949-1978年期间所取得的2.3%预期寿命增幅远高于这些国家按照正常标准计算得出的结果，它的表现是前所未见的出色。
    1
  14968.  @KuangWen0   谁说要是毛泽东还活着在，我即上不了大学？早在1945年，毛泽东就明确地指出，在80%的人口中扫除文盲，是新中国的一项重要工作。1949年底，在毛泽东直接关怀下召开的第一次全国教育工作会议决定：新中国的教育是新民主主义的教育，主要任务是提高人民文化水平，培养国家建设人才，肃清封建的、买办的、法西斯主义的思想，发展为人民服务的思想。 1950年6月，毛泽东又在中共七届三中全会上提出：“要有步骤地谨慎地进行旧有学校教育和旧有社会文化的改革工作。” 根据这些方针，中国国对旧的教育制度和教学组织进行了改革。人民政府收回了教育主权，改造了全国30余万所大中小学，使之纳入社会主义的办学轨道。之后，有了基本生活保障的人民，终于可以把自己的孩子送去上小学了。
    1
  14969.  @KuangWen0  总的来说，因为毛泽东在带领中国人民推翻外国长达一个世纪的压迫与带领中国走向民族复兴道路的过程中所发挥的作用，他在中国历史上占有一个独特的位置。他也在人类史上占有一个特殊的位置——历史与国际比较显示，人类史上从未有如此多的人如中国1949-1976年所做的一样，如此快速地提高其社会地位。这是西方与中国一些所谓的知识分子试图借历史虚无主义，抹黑中国1949-1976 年间所取得的社会成就的原因。
    1
  14970.  @KuangWen0  我说的是实际数据和统计数据，你在谈论你自己的轶事，英文叫“anecdotal evidence” 所以怎么来比呢？毛主席领导下，预期寿命、识字率都有所提高，我已经给了你数据，你还说数据没有可比性，还继续说你家里的事？谁会相信你？ 为什么我不能把中国和印度比？ 印度和中国都是世界上人口最多的国家，为什么要一定把大陆与香港和台湾相提并论？四大小龙人口无法与中国人口相媲美。 1950年中国婴儿死亡率很高，但毛泽东将中国婴儿死亡率降低了一半到1980年。在毛泽东领导下，中国的人口几乎翻了一番，从 1949 年的 5.4 亿增加到 1979 年的 9.69 亿。但看来你是一个不看数据的人，只看轶事的人。
    1
  14971.  @KuangWen0  以前我的祖父母是穷农民，但毛泽东从富有的腐败地主手中夺取土地，分给农民，就开始有自己的地盘。过去农民都不准上学，或是没有钱读书，但毛泽东改变了这，让农民优先上学，我父母就能上学成为工程师。所以我永远感谢毛泽东对贫困阶层的贡献。 但说出自己的故事有什么意义呢？你有自己的故事，我有我的，邓小平也有他的。与其谈论故事，不如看看数据和统计数据呢？可是看来你就是一个看轶事不看数据的人。 中国妇女地位提高是争议最少的毛泽东的遗产之一，西方评论员也承认毛泽东时期的努力大幅度提高了妇女的社会地位。毛泽东的名言“妇女能顶半边天”已经成了名言。毛泽东因为出身农家，所有对中国底层妇女的悲惨生活并不陌生。1927年毛泽东在考察了湖南农村几个县以后得出结论说：中国妇女除了要和男人一样受政权、族权、神权的支配外，还要受夫权的支配，妇女一生被这“四权”压弯了腰。 1949年10月1日新中国成立，妇女事业迎来新纪元，全国积极开展废娼运动，清除残害妇女的封建遗毒；开展婚姻法宣传，提升妇女的主体地位；开展扫盲运动，提升妇女素质；开展普选运动，推动妇女走上政治舞台。从1949年到1978年的30年间，党和国家十分重视妇女在政治、经济、文化、教育等领域的参与，使妇女真正成为国家、社会、家庭和自己的主人。 毛泽东强调，“中国的妇女是一种伟大的人力资源，必须发掘这种资源，为了建设一个伟大的社会主义国家而奋斗。”而对于妇女参加生产劳动，不仅社会上仍有传统偏见，连妇女自身也存在思想障碍，许多妇女不愿下地劳动，认为“相夫教子”才是正统。毛泽东指出，“没有扫除文盲，没有进小学、中学、大学，妇女还不可能彻底解放。”
    1
  14972.  @KuangWen0  你甚至不回答我的问题，但你不断要求我回答你的问题，还说我胡说？我已经把我的家族史告诉了你，但你仍然表现得好像我从未回答过你的任何问题，那我为什么要继续回答你不断的问题呢？ 现在你突然变成了一个看数据的人啊？你没看清楚我说的是祖父母父母上学的时代吗？你说的是1980年，但我说的是1949年之前。民国时期几乎没有农民教育，新中国成立后，农民教育更加重要。能达到50%的人在学校接受教育，已经蛮不错你不觉得吗？ 很明显你不欣赏我对你问题的回答，那我为什么还要继续回答你的问题呢？ 毛主席的许多成就我都说了不少。预期寿命、识字率、婴儿死亡率， 多说到有完没完，但你还不信那我没办法了。你说我胡说八道，那我就懒得回答你的问题了。 印度，非洲都是人口多的国家，像中国一样，所以我为什么不能跟他们比呢？你有没有看过印度非洲的预期寿命、识字率、婴儿死亡率吗？为什么偏偏要跟台湾香港比呢？人口少当然比较容易让人们摆脱贫困。
    1
  14973.  @c.g.5580  Orders for ventilators are pouring in and China is working 24/7 making ventilators. Video: China is working 24/7 to make ventilators youtu.be/kJ81HY_M-zI Ventilators can determine if some Covid-19 patients live or die. Doctors from Italy to the US desperately need them and orders at factories are pouring in. "There's literally no country in the world that doesn't want to buy a ventilator from China right now. We have tens of thousands of orders waiting. The issue is how fast we can make them." - Li Kai, Director of Beijing Aeonmed
    1
  14974. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  14975.  @antoncla8622  China has over 50 ethnic groups including Han, Tibetan, Uighur, Manchu, Mongolians, and even some Koreans in Northeastern China, so how to represent all 50+ different ethnic group cultures?
    1
  14976.  @antoncla8622  Therefore, since China is 90% Han Chinese, then why can't China promote Han culture? Those Tibetans, Uighurs, etc, are all Chinese citizens by birth so they learn Mandarin Chinese (world's most spoken language by number of speakers) Chinese history and singing patriotic songs about China. I mean, don't Hawaiians in Hawaii also learn English at school, American history and sing patriotic songs about America? The Native Americans too?
    1
  14977.  @antoncla8622  How is China being oppressive? By educating Uighurs, Tibetans in Mandarin Chinese (the language of business in China) teaching them Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their motherland? If China was Muslim country then of course, we should study the Koran, pray at mosques and sing Muslim hymns, but China is an atheist state so why can't we promote atheism then? Muslim countries like Pakistan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, etc all promote Islam in their own countries (at the expense of other cultures and religions) isn't it?
    1
  14978.  @antoncla8622  China has world's largest Internet population by number of users and Chinese is the 2nd most common language in the Internet today, so what makes you think Chinese Internet is not open? Source: List of countries by number of Internet users wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_Internet_users#List Source: Top 10 Internet Languages internetworldstats.com/stats7.htm
    1
  14979.  @mana2ashida150  What makes you think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all
    1
  14980.  @mana2ashida150  Didn't Edward Snowden of Wikileaks exposed US government spying activities on its allies as well as monitoring American citizens conversations for keywords relating to terrorism?
    1
  14981.  @mana2ashida150  Previously, Hong Kong was a thriving port city while as British colony, while the mainland was still dirt-poor at that time. Today however, fortunes have reversed and Hong Kong has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan and is facing increasing levels of competition from other upcoming mainland cities like _Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian, etc. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports Source: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage And that's despite mainland cities being under communist party rule, while Hong Kong is suffering under its own democratic government. No wonder why the people of Hong Kong feel as though they are being left behind as mainland cities start surpassing Hong Kong.
    1
  14982.  General G. Washington  China has to host the world's largest population, so its possible that there are simply not enough resources, not enough schools, not enough jobs for everyone in China. With such a huge student population, competition for top schools and higher education is extremely fierce and intense here in China. Some students unable to apply for local universities, so they may choose to study abroad (especially if their parents have $$$) Some graduates unable to find work in China, so they seek employment opportunities abroad as well. That's why Western countries are positively flooded with Chinese international students, competing with local students in tests, exams, for university spots and even job offers when they graduate. If overseas Chinese can't find a job in the West, they are always welcome to come back to China (thus saving China the resources needed to train this student to university degree) and bringing foreign knowledge and technology to our shores. If overseas Chinese find a job in your country, they are depriving a Western graduate of a job, and if they rise to high position in corporate or government posts, then they might get approached by the communist party to be recruited as a spy in Western countries. Whichever way you look at it, China wins.
    1
  14983.  General G. Washington  When did I ever said millions of people lack "basic" resources? According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china
    1
  14984.  @pest1234  Who are you?
    1
  14985.  @mana2ashida150  Take smartphones for example, Chinese smartphone companies dominate the 2019 Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands according to this source: mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) But where are all the famous companies from Hong Kong?
    1
  14986.  @antoncla8622  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  14987. Actually, studies have shown that more fossil-fuel vehicles have caught fire than electric vehicles.
    1
  14988. India is literally eying Pakistan territory in Jammu & Kashmir, the so-called "Pakistan Occupied Kashmir". How would you feel if Chinese wished J&K independence, since that's what you're calling for the Chinese province of Taiwan?
    1
  14989. ​ @samirsapher521  "how illegally PoK and LoC is operating" The so-called "Pakistan Occupied Kashmir" is basically part of Pakistan today, and India is the one eying Pakistan territory. As for the "Line of Control" the land was given to India by whom? By the British Imperialists who just draw the McMahon Line without even bothering to consult India's neighbors including China?
    1
  14990.  @kaibotski4939  "I wish Taiwan would be the legitimate government of China so obviously the Chinese population wouldn't be so negatively view by the world." Then why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all their advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the Communists' right to rule China. And even if had ROC succeeeded, that doesn't automatically equal to not viewing China negatively. Look at Russia, the Soviet Union has since collapsed, yet the Western world still views Russia with negativity. Even U.S immigration lists Russia nationals as "homeless"
    1
  14991.  @suryacheed  "1. land locked 2. in between 3 nuclear powers 3. one of them is expansionist and other is full of terrorists." The "expansionist" country you are referring to is clearly India right? The one that's clearly eyeing Pakistan territory, always calling it "Pakistan Occupied Kashmir" all the time.
    1
  14992.  @suryacheed  "Mate yes he went to China. The real china. The place you are talking about is not china it's people's republic of china." If that's so then why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all their advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the Communists' right to rule China.
    1
  14993.  @ShivdeepDhaliwal  Here's a video of modern day Lhasa, Tibet, China (filmed by WildFilmsIndia) and you can see how developed Lhasa has become under communist party rule. Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, and modern technology like cars, telephone cables, computers, smartphones, WiFi, the Internet, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo (By WildFilmsIndia) Even the poorest Tibetan farmer can afford a smartphone, connect to the Internet and shop online in Taobao and have his purchases shipped all the way to Tibet in the Himalayas. Because Tibet is part of China after all.
    1
  14994.  @ShivdeepDhaliwal  Here's a video of a Canadian tourist visit to Lhasa and he took the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) and explains how each carriage comes equipped with its own emergency oxygen tank. Video: Welcome to Lhasa - Exploring the City (By Vafa Anderson) youtu.be/J-TfN56ETVM He remarks how much Lhasa has changed in 10 years since he last visited. Throughout the video you can see many religious people worshipping, praying, spinning those prayer wheels and performing full-body kowtows on the ground, so how exactly is religion in Tibet impacted?
    1
  14995.  @samirsapher521  "神州 Shenzhou China wasn't even China at that time republic of China used to include Taiwan..." China was clearly China under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) which claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a Map of all the territory ROC claims (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) "how you hypocrites called it Chinese Taipei" It's the ROC government that calls themselves "Chinese Taipei" who are you calling hypocrites? "as for PoK its called PoK for a reason" Because Indians are eying Pakistan territory in Kashmir, that's why they call it POK, because you are eying another country's territory. "Around 7% of Pok has Hindu population what about them" In other words, are you saying 93% of the population is Muslims? Then isn't it clearly Pakistan territory, since they control it? "and its a shame people like you call PoK Pakistan's territory." Because currently it's under the control of Pakistan, and India is the one drooling over Pakistan territory (that's why you call it POK) then why is it a shame? If India has the capability, then why not India retake the so-called POK from Pakistan?
    1
  14996.  @hyc1266  Agreed. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today.
    1
  14997. Over the course of decades, the population of Uighurs in China actually grown from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020, yet the Western claims of alleged "genocide" still persist.
    1
  14998. China is the 4th most popular tourist destination in the world, after France, USA and Spain, and we are the most visited Asian country in the world, beating other destinations like Japan and Korea, so why do you claim nobody likes China?
    1
  14999.  @okt3667  In Doklam standoff, the Indian Army troops eventually withdrew from Doklam whereas PLA troops continue to patrol that area even till today. Also, what has Doklam got to do with China's technology like anti-satellite missiles and DF-41 (world's longest range ICBM) and our CH-4 combat UAVs?
    1
  15000.  @shubhamsuryawanshi658  China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank has commanded healthy respect from international observers, as its performance parameters are equal to many top Western designs (like the Russian T-90 and the US M1 Abrams), and the Type 99 also packs a few unique tricks of its own. Source: China's Deadly Type 99 Tank vs. Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/chinas-deadly-type-99-tank-vs-russias-t-90-americas-m-1-17836 China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank was even featured in our 70th anniversary National Day parade. Video: China's new generation main battlefield tanks revealed in National Day Parade youtu.be/Ec4Bu2orKTk
    1
  15001.  @shubhamsuryawanshi658  Indian Su30 detected China's Chengdu J-20 5th generation stealth fighter, because the J-20 was on training mission and they equipped with special "radar-reflectors" (Luneburg lens) attached to enlarge and conceal its true radar cross section during peacetime operations. Even the US Airforce equip their F-22 and F-35 with this radar reflectors during peacetime for safety and training purposes, due to the potential for accidents and identification from other aircraft or ground installations. Source: Luneburg lens: Radar reflector wikipedia.org/wiki/Luneburg_lens#Radar_reflector Of course, during actual wartime, our J-20 stealth fighters won't be equipped with this radar reflectors used during peacetime. Only 3 countries in the world have flown full-size stealth combat aircraft demonstrations and they are United States (in 1977), Russia (in 2010) and China (in 2011). Even today, only 2 countries have active stealth fighters serving operationally in our airforce and they are USA and China. Source: Stealth Aircraft wikipedia.org/wiki/Stealth_aircraft#Manned China's Type 99 or ZTZ-99 is 3rd generation battle tank that is ranked among the World's Top 10 Main Battle Tanks, with advanced features including: -a fully stabilised smoothbore gun with autoloader, capable of firing anti-tank sniper missiles, and speculated to be able to penetrate the armour of the US M1 Abrams at close range with tungsten rounds. -Composite armour hull with front portion and turret protected by explosive reactive armour that resist enemy shell penetration. -A multi-layered radar system that detects and denotates incoming enemy missiles before impact. -A laser warning receiver that warns the tank commander that the tank is being painted by hostile lasers. Source: China showcases Type 99 Battle Tank youtu.be/ktniek01Xyw Source: Top 10 Most Powerful Tanks youtu.be/M3n6q_dTjfk?t=385 And its up there with the fastest to boot, equipped with turbo-charged engine providing a maximum road speed of 50 mph (80 kph).
    1
  15002.  @shubhamsuryawanshi658  It's possible that Jordan may be selling off the Chinese CH-4B drone, because Jordan aims to replace the CH-4s with the more advanced Chinese made drones like perhaps, the CH-5, with a wingspan of 21 metres, a payload of 1,000 kg, able to carry 16 missiles at a single time, a maximum takeoff weight of over 3 tonnes, a service ceiling of 9 km, an endurance of up to 60 hours and a range of 10,000 km. Video: China's homegrown CH-5 drone holds live-fire drill youtu.be/HcETgSM_AAY I and unable to find any examples of Iran exporting Chinese weapons to substantiate your claim and which Chinese missile did not hit the target near Indonesia? China has inducted the world's first operational anti-ship ballistic missile, a "carrier killer" capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, known as the DF-21D. Video: China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile youtu.be/p-cEunmqXM8 The DF-21D is capable of targeting aircraft carrier strike groups out in the open ocean, from the safety of the land. The DF-21D is launched from land-based mobile launchers and flies high up into the stratosphere, using its advanced maneuverability to avoid interception by anti-missile defenses below, before falling at hypersonic speeds (above Mach 20) The warhead is even capable of terminal guidance, making last minute adjustments to its trajectory just seconds before impact.
    1
  15003.  @shubhamsuryawanshi658  China has hypersonic missiles like the DF-ZF, which have been tested 7 times already and travels at speeds between 4,000 and 7,000 miles per hour. Source: China Successfully Tests Hypersonic Missile freebeacon.com/national-security/china-successfully-tests-hypersonic-missile/ U.S. intelligence officials have assessed that China plans to use the glider to deliver nuclear weapons through increasingly sophisticated missile defenses. The DF-ZF also could be used as part of a conventional strategic strike weapon capable of hitting targets around the world within an hour. Can the United States scramble fighters to intercept China's hypersonic missiles, that can strike anywhere on Earth within an hour? Can they even detect China's hypersonic missile launch and deduce its intended target within an hour?
    1
  15004.  @shubhamsuryawanshi658  Chinese missiles have even demonstrated the capability to take out satellites in orbit. In 2007, a ground launched missile took out a faulty satellite in orbit at an altitude of 865 kilometres (537 mi), with a mass of 750 kg, by traveling with a speed of 8 km/s in the opposite direction. It was launched with a multistage solid-fuel missile from Xichang Satellite Launch Center or nearby. Source: 2007 Chinese anti-satellite missile test wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Chinese_anti-satellite_missile_test
    1
  15005.  @shubhamsuryawanshi658  Where's your anti-satellite weapon? You Indians only know how to talk big, but do nothing when it comes to implementation. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India in the past, but today, China has advanced tanks, stealth fighters, hypersonic missiles, etc. Our 5th generation stealth fighter Chengdu J-20 was equipped with radar reflectors during peacetime training mission, yet Indian media boast that their Su30 can detect J-20 and you just blindly believe it? China even manufacture our own combat UAVs like the Caihong (彩虹) series mentioned earlier and also the Wing Loong ll (翼龙-2) showcased at Dubai Airshow in 2017. Video: UAE: China's AVIC showcases upgraded Wing Loong ll drone at Dubai Airshow youtu.be/omU_olbV3gc Video: Wing Loong ll UAV demonstrates multiple missiles firing youtu.be/bTr_zPbvELU?t=5 Whereas India crashed their expensive Israeli-made drone at the Chinese border. Source: Indian drone crashes after entering Chinese airspace scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2123252/indian-drone-crashes-after-entering-chinese-airspace
    1
  15006.  @shubhamsuryawanshi658  Congratulations on India's 2019 Anti-satellite test. This comment thread was posted over 1 year ago, at the time when India had not tested any anti-satellite weapons. And the T-90 is Russian tank design, India is only granted the license to build T-90, but Russia may suddenly decide to withdraw the license. Can you explain how is India's Arjun Mk 2 better than China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank? The Arjun Mk 2 has poor firepower, their rifled 120 mm gun is inferior to the Type 99's smoothbore 125 mm cannon. Smoothbore is the way to go for modern tanks. India also dropped the LAHAT missile which is a bad move and the indigenous new missile is still being tested, leaving the lousy APFSDS round, which only has 300 mm penetrative and as compared to China's Type 99 penetration of 600 mm. Both tanks have explosive reaction armor and composites, but the Arjun Mk 2 has poorer coverage as much of the turret is uncovered as compared to the Type 99. The Type 99 is also among the world's fastest tanks, with 1500 hp engine, but only weighing 52 tonnes, while the Arjun Mk 2 has 1400 hp engine and weighs 68 tonnes. Besides, if China and India fight, it would most likely be over the Himalayas, and mountainous terrain is not as suitable for heavy tanks. As a response, China developed a Light Tank, the Type-15 which is suitable for mountainous terrain deployment like in Tibet, Donglong (Doklam) and in the Himalayas. Video: China's New Light Tank So Fast youtu.be/Fia_O_47IQk Video: China's Newest Tank, the Type 15 Makes Parade Debut youtu.be/NrQM7x5-myA On the other hand, Indian Army lacks a proper light tank to engage China on the mountainous Himalayas battlefield. Video: Indian Army shows interest in Light Tanks for defense along the border youtu.be/IljAqpDVytA
    1
  15007.  @shubhamsuryawanshi658  Where's news about India's 6th generation fighter? China has reportedly begun 6th generation fighter development, and has made important breakthroughs in designing and developing several key components, including next-generation engine, planning to field it in the 2025–2030 time frame. Source: Sixth Generation Jet fighter wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth-generation_jet_fighter#China The HAL Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) is an Indian programme to develop a fifth-generation fighter aircraft, not 6th generation. As for world's most powerful satellite, China's Gaofen 4 (高分-4), launched on December 28, 2015 from Xichang in central China, on a CZ-3B/Long March 3 rocket, to a geosynchronous orbit 22,000 miles above the Earth. Source: Gaofen 4, The World's Most Powerful GEO Spy Satellite, Continues China's Great Leap Forward Into Space popsci.com/gaofen-4-worlds-most-powerful-geo-spy-satellite-continues-chinas-great-leap-forward-into-space/ The Gaofen 4 is the world's most powerful GEO spy satellite. It has a color image resolution of slightly less than 50 meters (which is enough to track aircraft carriers by their wake at sea) and a thermal imaging resolution of 400m (good for spotting forest fires). It may also have a lower resolution video streaming capacity. Because of its round-the-clock coverage of Chinese territory and near aboard, Gaofen 4 can provide instant coverage of earthquake or typhoon hit areas to support humanitarian relief. It will also allow China to monitor strategic foreign sites such as WMD facilities and naval bases inside its observation box. China's Gaofen-5 (高分-5) is the world's first full spectrum hyperspectral satellite for environmental imaging launched into space. Video: China Launches World's First Full Spectrum Hyperspectral Satellite for Environmental Imaging youtu.be/AgYhHaNcjPc
    1
  15008.  @shubhamsuryawanshi658  Where's India self produced combat drone? China has combat UAVs like the Caihong-5 (彩虹-5) and the Wing Loong 2 (翼龙-2) and even supersonic spy drones like the DR-8 and the Sharp Sword stealth drone (which is capable of firing air-to-ground missiles), unveiled during our 70th Anniversary National Day of the founding of the People's Republic of China. Source: China unveils supersonic spy drone during National Day military parade rehearsal scmp.com/news/china/military/article/3027534/china-unveils-supersonic-spy-drone-during-national-day-military Source: China reveals new supersonic drone washingtontimes.com/news/2019/sep/18/chinas-supersonic-dr-8-done-revealed/ Source: China Showcases Stealthier Sharp Sword Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle Configuration thedrive.com/the-war-zone/30111/china-showcases-stealthier-sharp-sword-unmanned-combat-air-vehicle-configuration And about Donglong (Doklam) it is Chinese territory, not Indian territory, so why are Indian troops doing on Chinese territory you tell me? And PLA troops are still patrolling in Donglong, whereas Indian troops have withdrawn from Donglong. Source: PLA troops patrolling Doklam to exercise sovereignty: China economictimes.com/news/defence/pla-troops-patrolling-doklam-to-exercise-sovereignty-china/articleshow/60974831.cms Source: 1,000 Chinese soldiers reportedly still in Doklam a month after border stand-off ended scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2114265/1000-chinese-soldiers-reportedly-still-doklam-month
    1
  15009.  @shubhamsuryawanshi658  Why don't you provide sources to support your claims? China's first sub-meter high-resolution optical transmission stereo-mapping satellite, Gaofen-7 (高分-7) has successfully launched at the Taiyuan Satellite Launch Center. Video: China Launches First Sub-Meter Class Satellite into Space youtu.be/T88gLyiNrgc With a new level of resolution and the highest positioning accuracy in China, it can draw stereoscopic maps with fewer than one meter's (sub-meter) error for Chinese topography and even the whole world.
    1
  15010.  @shubhamsuryawanshi658  Kali 5000? China is home to the world's most powerful laser, the Shanghai Superintense Ultrafast Laser Facility, at a whopping 5.3 Petawatts. Video: China's Superintense Laser Could Create Matter From Energy youtu.be/8aux0Vs5w0o?t=27 The current record holding laser currently resides in China, at the Shanghai Superintense Ultrafast Laser Facility. In 2016, it set the bar with a 5. 3 million billion Watts of power, or 5.3 Petawatts. But its a peaceful laser experiment, designed to demonstrate Einstein's equation (e=mc^2) and create matter from energy.
    1
  15011.  @shubhamsuryawanshi658  How is Donglong Bhutan's territory? Chinese government has produced Maps showing that Donglong is part of China, such as the Convention of Calcutta signed in 1890: Under Article 1, the boundary of Sikkim and Tibet was defined as the crest of the mountain range separating the waters flowing into the Teesta River in Sikkim and its tributaries from the waters flowing into the Tibetan Mochu River and northwards into other rivers of Tibet. The line commenced at Mount Gipmochi on the Bhutan frontier, and followed the above watershed to the point where it met Nepali territory. Source: Convention of Calcutta wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_of_Calcutta#Provisions So Donglong is within China's side of Mount Gipmochi and clearly Chinese territory. What evidence has Bhutan produced to support its claims to Donglong? How is Aksai China considered Indian territory? Aksai China is a Turkic word with Aksai literally means "white brook" and China referring to China. Why you Indians want to claim Chinese territory as your own?
    1
  15012.  @shubhamsuryawanshi658  Besides China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank and Type 15 Light Tank, China has powerful artillery pieces like our PLZ-52 self-propelled howitzer, ranked among the Top 5 Self-propelled Howitzer in the world. Video: Top 10 Self Propelled Howitzer in the world youtu.be/AQBcIRwg2fg?t=473 China also have some of the world's top Multi Launch Rocket Systems (MLRS) systems like the SR-5, AR3 and the WS-2 MLRS system. Video: Top 10 Multi Launch Rocket Systems in the world youtu.be/66ETMGNrh98
    1
  15013.  @shubhamsuryawanshi658  What map? Donglong is part of China and not even Indian territory, so why Indian troops are on Chinese territory? You Indians talk so much, why don't you cite actual sources instead of just talking? Even your first Indian PM Nehru recognise Tibet as part of China, why do you claim that Tibet is different country? In Aksai Chin, Aksai means "White Brook" and the Chin refers to China, so why you Indians want to claim Chinese territory as your own? About the South China Sea, the North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    1
  15014.  @shubhamsuryawanshi658  Besides our impressive tanks, the PLA also regularly conduct live-firing exercises in Tibet and Xinjiang mountainous terrain, with our artillery pieces, howitzers and MLRSs, as shown in the following videos: Video: Chinese Army Carries Out Miltary Exercise on Tibetan Plateau youtu.be/a8bNgIckr10 Video: Chinese Artillery Troops Conduct Live Fire Exercises youtu.be/sDNIVHmQork
    1
  15015. I don't think a Biden administration will reverse the U.S ban on Huawei, Tik Tok, WeChat etc nor will Meng Wanzhou (Huawei's CFO) be released anytime soon. A Biden Administration will undoubtedly attack China on the so-called "human rights" front on issues such as Xinjiang and Hong Kong, because that's where Democrats draw their support from voters.
    1
  15016.  @teepee8479  As a Chinese and a non-American myself, I actually supported Trump's 2020 re-election over Biden's. Trump hardly paid any taxes to USA, but thank you Trump for paying taxes to China. I actually wished for another 4 more years of Trump for the United States.
    1
  15017. forbidmyname It's not only business and many tourists come to visit famous Chinese monuments like Great Wall of China, Forbidden City, Tomb of 1st Chinese emperor, terracotta army and so on. Many also come here to study and China has become the top destination for international students in Asia, beating other Asian countries like Japan and South Korea in terms of number of international students.
    1
  15018. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15019. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15020. Taiwan island is an inseparable part of China
    1
  15021. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15022. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15023.  @agent1.618  There are many viruses like Bird Flu, Swine Flu, H1N1, MERS, and other virus outbreaks that still occur regardless of wet markets. So why should China change our eating habits, when virus mutation is random in nature and can occur anywhere, anytime, regardless of Chinese eating habits?
    1
  15024.  @wafiameher3501  I'm Chinese, so why can't I defend Chinese eating habits? I mean, Chinese cuisine is delicious and people all over the world have proclaimed their love of Chinese food. Want something flavorful? Try our Sweet & Sour Pork. If you want something meaty, we have Peking Duck. If you want something light, we have Dim Sum Dumplings. If you're in a hurry, just grab convenient Baozi (Pork Bun) and eat it on the go. If you like mild spicy, care to try our Kung Pao Chicken? If you like very spicy, dare to try our Mapo Tofu? If you are vegetarian, we have vegetarian Springrolls. And we are tofu heaven. If you like rice, we have Fried Rice. If you like noodles, we have Chow Mein. If you like porridge, we have Congee. If you like soups, we have Hotpot. If you like seafood, well you're in luck, because Chinese love seafood too. Food is life, and no culture celebrates food as much as Chinese culture, whether it is the preparation of food or its consumption.
    1
  15025.  @rpg1663  Capitalism is ultimately about earning profits for the few select people at the top, not so much improving people's lives. During the 19th Century Industrial Revolution, the capitalists seek to shrink worker wages in order to skim off a wider profit margin for themselves, while workers slaved away under poor conditions and are paid a pittance for their effort and contributions. And the Industrial Revolution was when capitalists began polluting our environment. Here's a video of the time-lapse history of global CO2 emissions by humans (1751-2008) youtu.be/SAhZ1fA1AJs Our CO2 emissions pre-Industrial Revolution were far, far, lower that post-Industrial Revolution.
    1
  15026.  user-bz4tw3bu9u  China has actually written off debt from many developing nations, how's that a mark of debt trap diplomacy?
    1
  15027. How to define exactly what is "equal" contribution in the Belt and Road Initiative? All business transactions are not equal, and every company seeks to make profit. But the transaction is agreed upon by both parties. In the case of Pakistan economic corridor project, Pakistan lacks the necessary engineers and building materials like cement to build infrastructure, so what China is doing is sending engineers to build infrastructure and supplying cement of our own, while Pakistan is doubling its cement production, and doubling university enrollment for engineers. In the future, when Pakistan has enough engineers and cement, then Pakistan can start taking over the work of Chinese in CPEC. But in the meantime, Pakistan is having infrastructure built by Chinese engineers and Chinese cement, while it is preparing its own engineers and cement production to take over in future.
    1
  15028. It's India's choice not to come on board OBOR, and China respects India's decision. But that does not mean India's neighbors don't want Chinese business. China is making Asia strong, by building infrastructure in less developed countries like Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Maldives, as well as African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Angola, etc.
    1
  15029. Frankly speaking, Trump is actually one of the few U.S President that did not start any new hot war during his term. In fact, Trump actually facilitate U.S withdrawal from Afghanistan through negotiation with Taliban (however, it is Biden that carried out the botched withdrawal). Before he became president, Biden has previously supported wars in Middle East.
    1
  15030.  @wnklee6878  "神州 Shenzhou True. But Biden follows rules (of the Deep State), while Trump is a lose cannon." But is following rules (of the Deep State) better? The Deep State is ultimately what controls the United State's warmongering attitudes, so following it means continuing America's warmongering attitudes. Where's Trump like it or not, was one of the few U.S presidents who did not start a new hot war, doesn't this represent a change from the usual path by the Deep state?
    1
  15031.  Kitty Cat  Still, Trump is one of the few U.S President that did not start any new hot war during his term. He came close to, but he didn't.
    1
  15032.  @gulamog5041  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  15033.  @yuanfangli9272  It's a good thing that the People's Liberation Army is loyal to the Communist Party of China, because look at Myanmar having a military coup and the army overthrew their government, plunging the country into civil strife. At least in China, the PLA is loyal to the CPC.
    1
  15034. Trump won't be in charge forever, and he will eventually be forced to step down once his presidential term limit is reached. China is patient and if our president can't cut a deal with Trump, then there's always the next US president to work with. President Xi abolished the term limits after all, so it's likely he'll remain in power long after Trump steps down. Who knows, maybe the next POTUS might just start reversing Trump's policies and lift the whole US-China trade war, thus possibly resulting in future economic boom for China, as US-China trade relations resume their previous pre-tradewar levels. Who knows?
    1
  15035.  @87aggietim  Why can't I be on YouTube? Nobody will come arrest you for logging onto YT while in China.
    1
  15036.  @87aggietim  When did you ever asked about freedoms in China here in this thread?
    1
  15037.  @87aggietim  What makes you think Chinese people lack freedom? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending coin on your economies. Your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. So what makes you think Chinese people lack freedoms? Chinese people can be virtually found all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all. Go to your neighborhood and see how many Chinese nationals you can find. Or go to your local university and ask your local students how they feel about the "Chinese competition"
    1
  15038.  @87aggietim  "神州 Shenzhou My point is that you cannot have a good economy and economic growth that lasts when you have a government that oppresses it's people." Hong Kong was ruled by authoritarian British colonial rule for more than 150 years, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy, and the British ruthlessly quelled the 1967 Hong Kong protests. But Hong Kong experienced massive economic growth as British colony and Hong Kong was a thriving port city and global finance hub, all while being under authoritarian British colonial rule. So who says you can't have good conomy and economic growth under authoritarian regime?
    1
  15039.  @87aggietim  said: "Look at Taiwan they have a great economy." Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party Kuomintang rule for more than half its life! For decades, the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist, and KMT leader Chiang kai-Shek was dictator who jailed and executed his dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and Chiang impose martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan flourished and rapidly modernized, resulting in Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹) Between 1952 and 1982, Taiwan economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 and 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 and 1986 and the percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 and 1986. And it was all achieved under authoritarian single-party KMT rule. Only when democracy was introduced to Taiwan (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan if KMT did not introduce political reforms) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest in 1990s. Today Taiwan's economy is in a slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is high, and Taiwan graduates are seeking job opportunities abroad, such as in mainland China or in Singapore. So what makes you think you can't have economic growth cannot under authoritarian rule? KMT authoritarian rule worked for Taiwan, then if it's not broken, why fix it?
    1
  15040.  @87aggietim  The Soviet Union had many technological advancement during its day. For example, the first satellite in space was Soviet Sputnik-1 and the first man in space was Russian Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, and the first space station launched into space was Soviet Salyut-1. And these technological advancements occurred under authoritarian Soviet Union rule isn't it?
    1
  15041.  @87aggietim  What articles did you sent? I have not seen you post any articles here on this comment thread, nor did you mention anything about the freedoms of people under CCP. Stop pretending that you sent any articles or that I have to get back to you on something you clearly never asked before.
    1
  15042.  @87aggietim  What are you talking about? What articles did you sent on this thread? I've looked through this thread multiple times and not once did you send any article like you are claiming. Quit trying to act as though you sent articles when you clearly didn't.
    1
  15043.  @87aggietim  What about Chinese human rights? I have already answered you that Chinese tourists and Chinese students can be found all over the world. I have shown that Hong Kong and Taiwan were actually ruled by authoritarian British colonial rule and Kuomintang rule respectively, and that was how they prospered. I even shown that Soviet Union was capable of technological advancement like launching world's first satellite Sputnik-1, world's first man in space was Russian Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, and the first space station was Soviet Salyut-1.
    1
  15044.  @87aggietim  Then you started claiming to have sent some "articles," when you clearly did not post any articles on this comment thread, so who are you trying to fool here? You didn't post any articles here like you are claiming, so why are you demanding answers to your "articles" when you didn't post anything? Go and have your eyes checked please.
    1
  15045.  @87aggietim  Soviet Union was great because it was under authoritarian rule. Its economy collapsed because it started introducing democracy, so why should China follow Soviet Union's path and introduce democracy then? Soviet Union fell apart because of democracy, not communism. Also, the Salyut program followed this with five more successful launches of seven more stations. The final module of the program, Zvezda (DOS-8) became the core of the Russian segment of the International Space Station and remains in orbit.
    1
  15046. ​ @87aggietim  Hong Kong and Taiwan were ruled by authoritarian British colonial rule and Kuomintang rule respectively, and that was how they prospered. Hong Kong had been British Colony for more than 100 years and during that period, Hong Kong prospered, not because it was a democracy. And Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party Kuomintang rule for more than half its life! Chiang kai-Shek was dictator who jailed and executed his dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and Chiang impose martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Yet that was how Taiwan prospered.
    1
  15047.  @87aggietim  You clearly did not sent any articles here in this thread, so who are you trying to fool with your non-existent articles? You are pretending to have sent "articles" when you clearly didn't so what do you hope to achieve by consistently claiming that you sent articles? I don't see any articles at all, despite you constantly claiming to have sent some. Go and book an appointment with your optician or doctor and see if they can help you with your "articles"
    1
  15048.  @87aggietim  You said 40 million Chinese were killed in the Cultural Revolution? Where did you get such bloated figure from? China's population in 1965 was 706,590,947 and by 1975, it had risen to 905,580,445, having increased by 198,989,498. So does the alleged 40 million killed during the Cultural Revolution really impact China all that much? Source: populationpyramid net/china/1965/
    1
  15049.  @87aggietim  You never sent me any articles at all, so why are you constantly claiming that you did, when you have posted zero articles on my comment thread? Where on this thread did you post any articles like you keep claiming to? Anyone can see here that you did not even provide a single article at all, so what's your point here?
    1
  15050.  @PatriFerri  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  15051.  @matthewmorgan7106  Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why Apple, Google, Facebook and Amazon dominate their respective industries and eliminated competition from smaller American firms, stifling innovation through competition. China actually has an anti-monopoly law to clamp down on anti-competitive practices in the industry, even Jack Ma of Alibaba is being investigated under China's anti-monopoly laws.
    1
  15052.  @Andrew-ib7gs  Why do you resort to fallacies like hurling ad hominen attacks against the Barretts and Cyrus Janssen instead of attacking the points they brought up?
    1
  15053. Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Tibet broke free of the mainland in 1913 but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951, so why should China give up our ancestral lands?
    1
  15054.  @engr_rioja  Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) for short in 1952, affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there is legal document binding Tibet to China isn't it? Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CCP, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    1
  15055.  @Conserpov  Indeed. I've also watched RT on Odysee or Rumble from time to time, just to hear the Russian side of events (which is important if we want to bring balance to the one-sided Western MSM's portrayal of events in Ukraine)
    1
  15056. I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  15057. Journalist: "How long will it take the Ukrainians to be trained to operate these new weapons?" Defense Official: "Oh, it's not going to take long...just a matter of days, maybe 25 days tops... that's still in days right?"
    1
  15058. Nick Sanfilippo China is often the largest trade partner in those countries you mentioned. If they dislike China so much, then why they do business with China?
    1
  15059. China's ghost cities are slowly being filled up. For example, in 2011, London’s Daily Mail reported that Zhengzhou was China’s largest ghost city. But today, Zhengzhou has a has a population of 10,120,000 inhabitants, and had a GDP of 1,014 billion(RMB) in 2018. Don't believe me? Here's a short 4min video of beautiful Zhengzhou: youtu.be/jFdLkgDS-QE?t=8 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  15060. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military budget. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western media constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  15061. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military budget. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western media constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  15062. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military budget. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western media constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  15063. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑
    1
  15064. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15065. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  15066. Those Hong Kong vandals spoke typical Hong Kong Cantonese, not Mandarin Chinese, so how can they be mainland Chinese, from PLA or PAPF?
    1
  15067.  @raymondchoon  Those Hong Kong vandals and arsonists spray paint anti-China slogans like "Chinazi" and they broke into the mainland Chinese stores in HK, like _Xiaomi, Huawei, Oppo, Bank of China,z etc and set fire to them, why would they be mainland Chinese you tell me? Every Hong Kong Police and rioters footage depict them speaking Cantonese, not Mandarin Chinese.
    1
  15068.  @raymondchoon  Where does Hong Kong Police spare the manpower to disguise themselves as vandals and arsonists? Hong Kong Police manpower and resources are already stretched to the limit dealing with the HK protestors so how to spare the manpower to conduct this vandalism against Hong Kong public property?
    1
  15069. theylied1776 What's the point of having US engineers, if the railgun never left the testing facility, even after more than 12 years of research? As for the Chengdu J-20, Chinese engineers have developed a domestic turbofan engine, the WS-15, specifically for use in replacing Russian engines in the J-20.
    1
  15070. theylied1776 The rocket was ancient Chinese invention, not American. What about Americans using Chinese inventions like paper, compass and gunpowder then? Chinese people don't complain about Westerners using Chinese inventions.
    1
  15071. theylied1776 The rocket was used in Song dynasty China and much historical evidence supports that it was invented in China.
    1
  15072. theylied1776 An illustration and description in the 14th century Chinese Huolongjing by Jiao Yu shows the oldest known multistage rocket. This was the 'fire-dragon issuing from the water' (火龙出水, huǒ lóng chū shuǐ), used mostly by the Chinese navy.
    1
  15073. theylied1776 Also, back in your original post, you talk about how China took 13 years, but the result was an aircraft carrier that made a maiden voyage into the ocean. What about USA spending over 12 years (from 0:28 of the video) developing the railgun, but it hasn't yet managed to mount a railgun on a naval vessel?
    1
  15074. Justin Watson Why are you being so rude here? When did I say anything about Chinese being ungrateful at all here? All I did was highlight that USA hasn't gone anywhere with the railgun, even after more than 12 years.
    1
  15075. Actually not millions, not billions, but trillions of dollars. The F35 program is world's most expensive military program, costing about 1.45 trillion dollars of taxpayers money. Just for comparison, China owns about 1.2 trillion dollars of US debt as of 2017.
    1
  15076. JustinWatson Even Donald Trump criticised the insane costs of the Lockheed Martin F-35 program, claiming that it was out of control didn't he? As for China, the PLA Air Force has inducted the Chengdu J-20 into service and is not stopping there, and beginning work on a new 6th generation fighter. Why do you accuse me of lying, and even told me to "shut my dirty Chinese mouth", calling me some rich little kid that wanna talk bad and bite the hands that fed me. When did I ever made any personal attacks against you at all?
    1
  15077. China is reviving the "Mandate of Heaven" where a competent leader is allowed to stay in power, to maximise the benefits to China, and an incompetent leader will be eventually overthrown by the common people, as part of Heaven's will. Only that this is more modern version that's all.
    1
  15078. In June 1989, there were no deaths in Tiananmen Square itself. Jay Mathews, an author and education columnist with the Washington Post reported that "As far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square. All verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully."
    1
  15079. Look at the sheer amount of anti-China vitriol spewed by the Western propaganda. Western anti-China media constantly paint China in negative light and "demonise" our country, even when China is sending medical supplies all over the world.
    1
  15080.  @CuongNguyen-le5ic  According to WTO website on disputes; the USA, EU and China had seen the following number of dispute cases; United States: 131 cases as complainant, 165 cases as respondent European Union: 102 cases as complainant, 95 cases as respondent China: 22 cases as complainant, 43 cases as respondent. So isn't it the United States of America that have seen over hundred dispute cases and even European Union that have seen about a hundred dispute cases. China has seen barely even 50 dispute cases in comparison. If you don't believe me, you can go to WTO website directly and count the number of dispute cases yourself. Here is the link to WTO website on dispute settlement. Source: wto(dot)org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_maps_e.htm
    1
  15081. So why can't China have overseas bases as well, since India has so many overseas bases?
    1
  15082. +yash7106 yeah, but why India feels encircled by "string of pearls" when China only has one base in Djibouti, Africa, that's all?
    1
  15083. +yash7106 But according to your source, String of Pearls is just "theory" that's all, and could be just be imagined threat. If you look at List of Countries with Overseas Bases, China only has one base (currently) located in Djibouti that's all, as compared to India's 6 overseas bases. Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_overseas_military_bases
    1
  15084.  @justmyedits6596  I'm saying that if you go ask a Chinese person in China, one who has never watched American media, on his/her idea of a Russian person, it might turn out be a blue-eyed blonde as well. Without any influence from American media at all.
    1
  15085.  @nivasg5495  China is home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight 神威·太湖之光 and Tianhe-2 天河-2 and in the 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source: China surpasses US in supercomputer usage cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/
    1
  15086. What West Philippine Sea? There is no West Philippine Sea on the globe, but there does exist a South China Sea. Also, Taiwan claims an even larger area (11-Dash Line) of the South China Sea as compared to mainland China (9 Dash Line)?
    1
  15087.  @budenskarinderia  There is no internationally recognized region in the world called the West Philippine Sea. However, there is a South China Sea, and Taiwan claims a larger swathe of the SCS than mainland China.
    1
  15088.  @HoneyboyDominguez-dw8if  Lol, even Taiwan doesn't recognize the 2016 Arbitral Ruling in favor of the Philippines, calling it "completely unacceptable" and "non-legally binding." And the fact remains that there's no internationally recognized region called the West Philippines Seas, only the South China Seas.
    1
  15089.  @ceruleanshroom  Haven't you heard of the Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident where a Taiwanese fishing boat tried to ram a Philippines Coastguard and in response, the coastguard open fired and killed 65-year old Taiwanese Hong Shicheng (洪石成)?
    1
  15090.  @zhugbu  Taiwan doesn't even recognize the 2016 tribunal ruling, calling it "completely unacceptable" and "non-legally binding."
    1
  15091.  @zhugbu  So you're saying Taiwan doesn't follow rule of law, since they don't recognize the 2016 tribunal ruling? Then why is Philippines congratulating Taiwan when Taiwan claims the 11 Dash Line?
    1
  15092. Gaurav Dey Shaurya is actually ballistic missile, not cruise missile. It will only achieve hypersonic speed at the end stage, but is vulnerable to interception before attaining hypersonic speed. A cruise missile will attain its maximum speed shortly after launch and maintain that speed throughout its journey, which is why they are called cruise missiles.
    1
  15093.  @auroragb  You want to bring up the Four Asian Tigers? South Korea's success occurred because it was under authoritarian rule of S. Korean dictator Park Chung Hee. When Park came to power in 1961, South Korea was a dirt-poor country (poorer than some Sub-Sahara African countries) and it's per capita income was only US$72.00 and North Korea was actually the greater economic and military power on the peninsula. One of Park's main goals was to end the poverty of South Korea, and lift the country up from being a 3rd World economy to a 1st World economy via etatist methods, and Park is credited with playing a pivotal role in the development of South Korea's tiger economy by shifting its focus to export-oriented industrialisatio, which resulted in the Miracle on the Han River (漢江의 奇蹟) and put S. Korea on the world map. But Park grew increasingly dictatorial (especially after 1971). In 1972, Park declared martial law and amended the constitution into a highly authoritarian document called the Yushin Constitution which was tantamount to an abolishment of the former Constitution, and granting him immense political power. During this time political opposition and dissent was constantly repressed and Park had complete control of the Media and Military. Source: Wikipedia: Park Chung Hee In summary, Park is a controversial figure for his dictatorship and undemocratic ways. He created and sustained the Miracle on the Han River, which reshaped and modernized South Korea, but was criticized for his authoritarian way of ruling the country and for prioritizing economic growth and contrived social order at the expense of civil liberties. Nevertheless, S. Korea became a Tiger Economy because of his authoritarian rule.
    1
  15094.  @auroragb  As for the last 2 Asian Tigers, I have already elaborated that Hong Kong prospered because it was under authoritarian British colonial rule, and that Singapore has been under authoritarian single-party PAP rule for its entire life as a nation. Can't you see that the Asian Tigers grew under authoritarian rule, not the so-called "Western democracy" that the West has been promoting all along? Likewise, China has been under authoritarian single-party CCP rule for 70 years, and look at how much progress China has made under authoritarian rule. Why you Singaporeans been brainwashed by Western media into somehow thinking that Western democracy is the best political system, when Singapore is not a Western democracy, and its progress was possible because of authoritarian single-party PAP rule?
    1
  15095.  @auroragb  All of those Asian Tigers performed well and like I elaborated earlier, all of them advanced under their respective dictatorships (Lee Kuan Yew, Park Chung Hee, Chiang kai-Shek, British colonial rule) so what's your point? You failed to indicate how exactly did democracy and liberalism played a role in the rise of those Asian Tigers. Take Taiwan for example, and after democratizing, Taiwan's economy suffered greatly as explained below "From the '90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreements on policy matters. This produced less effective policy making. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be more conservative in Taiwan so they do not enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou Research Fellow Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Video: How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents youtube.com/watch?v=P3BCnPb8qHY&t=110
    1
  15096.  @auroragb  Besides Beijing, Shanghai has grown into a global financial center and transport hub, with the world's busiest container port and renowned for its Lujiazui skyline, and museums and historic buildings along The Bund, the City God Temple and the Yu Garden. Here is a short 3 minute aerial video of magnificent Shanghai: youtube.com/watch?v=1cC-j4_NtvE&t=6 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience) No wonder why Hong Kong fears being left behind as mainland port cities are overtaking them. And Shanghai achieved all this while being under authoritarian communist party rule, which the Western anti-Communist propaganda been denouncing all this while. And those 4 Asian Tigers all progressed rapidly under authoritarian dictatorships, so why follow Western democracy? Because Westerners says so? Not every country has to follow Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  15097.  @auroragb  Where does it show that this disagreements are over China policies? Once again, you are making up false claims that you yourself without any proof, just like you did with an imaginary time limit for granting universal suffrage under Article 45. Your arguments lack substance and only try to twist the situation to blame the mainland for Taiwan and Hong Kong faults. I mean, both Taiwan and Hong Kong GDP growth was highest when there was no democracy, when Taiwan was under authoritarian single-party KMT rule and HK under authoritarian British Colonial rule. Their economies only suffered with the introduction of democracy, so why fix what isn't broken?
    1
  15098.  @auroragb  And It was United Nation's own decision to kick out Republic of China (Taiwan) and to recognize the People's Republic of China (China) as China, through a democratic voting process back in 1971. According to United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1668, any proposal to change the designated representation of China at the UN would require a two-thirds majority vote and the poll results were 61 in favor, 34 against it, 7 abstaining and 2 non-voting. Next, the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response and the results were 76 in favor, 35 against it, 17 abstaining and 3 non-voting Source; Wikipedia: China and the United Nations Since the poll results favored China (with two-thirds majority vote each time) the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, and recognized the People's Republic of China (PRC) as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed the collective representatives of Chiang Kai-shek and the Republic of China from the United Nations. So it was UN countries that democratically voted to recognize PRC as the real China and to kick ROC out of the UN Security Council. Your UN countries literally voted to legitimize CCP.
    1
  15099.  @auroragb  And it's not just BJ and SH that are successful. Here is a short 2 minute video of beautiful night view of 11 Chinese cities. Video: 🇨🇳Beautiful Night View of 11 Chinese Cities in 2 Minutes - 中国大陆11座城市美丽夜景 youtube.com/watch?v=mzR8Scsd33g These mainland cities are are successful under CCP authoritarian rule, while HK and TW are suffering under their own democratic rule. Imagine if HK was returned fully to mainland China (Hong Kong will be fully part of China by 2047, when the Sino-British declaration expires) and if Taiwan was reunified with the mainland. Then these provinces will also enjoy much greater prosperity under mainland rule, as I have demonstrated in mainland Chinese cities.
    1
  15100.  @auroragb  Taiwan is part of China under the One China Policy, as agreed by both Taiwan and mainland China government. And the Republic of China claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Manchuria, etc) as well as territory under the control of modern day Mongolia, Burma/Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Source: Map of ROC Administrative and Claims wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg Since ROC can claim all the above territory, then why can't PRC claim Taiwan as well?
    1
  15101.  @auroragb  Look at prosperous Shenzhen on the mainland, just across from Hong Kong, and Shenzhen is a technological mecca and China's version of Silicon Valley. Here is a short 2 minute aerial video of Shenzhen: City of the Future youtube.com/watch?v=45X0Q1d6Jwk&t=3 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience) In Shenzhen you can find the latest gadgets, smartphone devices, cameras, drones, automation, robots, IT, Artificial Intelligence systems, software and hardware. Chinese company DJI (world's largest civilian drone maker) holds a competition in Shenzhen for Chinese college graduates to compete in robotic battles and the winners of this contest get awarded a job offer to work in DJI. Video: China's High-Stakes Robot Wars youtube.com/watch?v=qrhvZhPaxQ4 How is Hong Kong going to compete with Shenzhen, just one of many rising mainland cities?
    1
  15102.  @auroragb  Virtually all the new buildings in Zhengzhou are newly constructed, what "original construction" are you referring to? How does tearing down unoccupied buildings attract new residents you tell me? And Zhengzhou is not the only "ghost city" that filled up, The Wujin diestrict of Changzhou has been called a Ghost City by the China Youth Daily and other Chinese and international publications. But is it really? Video: Changzhou, China Ghost City? youtube.com/watch?v=oEhytPP-FQA Changzhou A Short Timelapse youtube.com/watch?v=1DvrkOOeNqc Investing money into real estate isn't really a waste of resources, since sooner or later, housing will always be in demand as world populations grow larger and in China's case, more people from the rural countryside migrate to the cities to find jobs. I mean, even in Singapore, there are always new housing estates being launched in order to cater to its people's demand for houses. And it is The People who will be occupying these cities eventually, so why do you claim that these cities do not serve the people of the nation? Your arguments are literally born out of sheer spite for China's success, rather than putting any serious thought behind your comment, that's why your points are easily shot down.
    1
  15103.  @auroragb  If you claimed that they are the same entity, then why not dissolve your own government then, since they are the same as the people? Why have governments then, if people are capable of ruling themselves according to your logic?
    1
  15104.  @auroragb  When did I avoid your question about ghost cities? I clearly said that there are other Chinese ghost cities which haven't been filled up yet didn't I? And about Zhengzhou, the increase in population in 7 years obviously came from the influx of rural migrants to Zhengzhou to find jobs, so what else needs to be said about rural migrants you tell me? And you are the one avoiding my question since I first asked you who is more qualified to rule the country, The People or The Government. And I did ask you another question previously to dissolve your government and this is what I wrote: "@Steve Liu If you claimed that they are the same entity, then why not dissolve your own government then, since they are the same as the people?" You keep saying the question is not answerable, when I clearly given you 2 choices: The People or The Government. You can even modify them to be more specific, like The Ordinary People or The Government in charge but it is clear that this question is answerable. You're just not answering it because you would pick The Government either way.
    1
  15105.  @auroragb  What "most democracies" are you talking about? Look at India, world's largest democracy for example, and it only has a literacy rate of 74%, which means that over 25% of Indians are illiterate, yet they are allowed to participate in political decisions that will affect India's future? Every 1 in 4 Indians has not graduated from school, so why do Indians allow them to participate in voting then? Because their British colonial masters told them democracy is the best? And there are so many problems with democracies like I mentioned earlier, on how the ordinary people just aren't qualified to participate in politics. Look at Brexit, Donald Trump's election, Indian politics, etc, and what makes you think democracy is the best form of government you tell me? You mean you're just going to claim that these problems "don't exist" so they don't need to be solved?
    1
  15106.  @auroragb  And why do you have such a low opinion of Chinese construction? Besides hosting 50% of the world's tallest buildings, China also has the world's most skyscrapers at 1,651, followed by USA with 737 and Japan with 240. Source: 10 countries with the most skyscrapers equity.media/2018-countries-most-skyscrapers/ Wikipedia: List of cities with the most skyscrapers wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_with_the_most_skyscrapers
    1
  15107.  @auroragb  Besides skyscrapers, China also boasts impressive bridge construction and China is home to many of the world's longest, highest and tallest bridges. Sources: List of longest bridges wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest_bridges List of highest bridges wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest_bridges#Completed_bridges List of tallest bridges wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_bridges#Completed Video: Half of world's 100 highest bridges are here in China's Guizhou youtube.com/watch?v=gnIfbXT3ZrM World's longest sea bridge! Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge to boost logistics youtube.com/watch?v=3gLzWXxQkKs China is the father of the world bridge youtube.com/watch?v=8zjgx51x1yc
    1
  15108.  @auroragb  Again, who is asking you to dissolve people? I clearly never asked you to dissolve people, you are the one deliberately distorting the meaning of "dissolving the government" to the insane notion of "dissolving people," just to avoid answering the question. It's crazy what lengths you go to, twisting words just because you are unable to answer the simple question I've posed to you. And you claimed the people are capable of governing themselves, so again, why do you need a government then, since you seem to think ordinary people can govern themselves? Why spend money and resources electing a government, when ordinary people can govern themselves according to your logic? Since when is CCP forced onto Hong Kong and Taiwan? Hong Kong has its own separate government from the mainland, under the One Country, Two Systems policy, proposed by China, so how is CCP forced onto Hong Kong? The Hong Kong Chief Executive is elected by Election Committee which consist entirely of Hong Kong groups, and all Beijing does is appoint the Chief Executive that's all and Beijing does not get to vote in Hong Kong's elections. So how is CCP forced onto Hong Kong like you claimed? Hong Kong is legally part of China, and China can always abolish the Hong Kong government and fully reclaim Hong Kong as part of China (which would happen by 2047) but China is allowing Hong Kong to have their own separate government from the mainland, so again, how is Hong Kong forced to accept CCP? And Taiwan has their own separate government, so who is forcing CCP onto Taiwan? The mainland also once offered to extend to One Country, Two Systems policy to include Taiwan as well, allowing Taiwan to keep their government and for the mainland to keep ours, yet remaining as a single unified country. No other country in the world is willing to tolerate having multiple political systems existing within their borders, except for China. There are no Democratic countries that have more than one political system within their borders.
    1
  15109.  @auroragb  Besides skyscrapers and bridges, China is also home to world's largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable and passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coin, pen and mobile phone on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE Before the advent of high-speed rail, during Spring Festival, people in China return to our home province to celebrate the Chinese New Year with family and friends, and the whole journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high speed rail, the commuting time has been reduced from days to mere hours.
    1
  15110.  @RaginYak  Chinaman? Why you yourself stoop to using borderline racist terms to address me? The Tibetan language is a member of the Sino-Tibetan family of languages and this is a fact. Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Tibet broke free of China in 1913 but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951, so what'swrongwith China's claim to Tibet? Even if you draw the Map of the People's Republic of China today, Tibet Autonomous Region is clearly regarded as part of China.
    1
  15111.  @RaginYak  You mock Chinese goods as junk? Take smartphones for example, Chinese smartphone companies dominate the 2019 Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands according to this source: mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French)
    1
  15112.  @samuelboucher1454  "神州 Shenzhou They have over 50 ethnic groups which they are trying re-educate as Han" Look at the United States and American is home to Caucasian Americans (white), African Americans (black), Hispanic/Latin Americans (brown), Asian Americans (yellow) and Native Americans (red). Despite these different "colours" they are all American citizens as long as they are born in America, isn't it? Likewise, China has 50+ ethnic minority and they are all considered Chinese citizens as long as they are born in China. Even the Tibetans in TAR and the Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth. And who says they are being re-educated as Han? Mandarin Chinese (world's most spoken language by number of speakers) is not actually a Han language at all.
    1
  15113.  @RaginYak  "神州 Shenzhou The mountain climber shows again another proof of Tibet being Independent" What sort of logic is this? What makes you think a couple of mountain climbers are proof of independence? It was the Tibetans that signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet 中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议 in 1951 affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So China had both historical claims as well as modern claims to Tibet. Not some mountain climbers.
    1
  15114.  @RaginYak  You mock Chinese goods as junk, but take a look at the Top Selling Smartphone Brands in India and Chinese companies dominate that list. Top 10 Most Popular Smartphone Companies in India 1. Samsung (South Korean) 2. Xiaomi (Chinese) 3. OnePlus (Chinese) 4. Apple (American) 5. Vivo (Chinese) 6. Oppo (Chinese) 7. Lenovo (Chinese) ... Source: Top 10 Most Popular Smartphone Companies in India walkthroughindia.com/hot-trends/top-10-most-popular-smartphone-companies-in-india/ Source: Four of the top five smartphone brands sold in India are Chinese qz.com/india/1675443/xiaomi-oppo-vivo-realme-indias-favourite-smartphone-brands/
    1
  15115.  @samuelboucher1454  Look at China today and China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  15116.  @RaginYak  Anything wrong with Wikipedia? The 14th Dalai Lama was a traitor to his people and a CIA agent, who conspired with America against China, receiving funding from the CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas to engage in separatist activities against the communist party. Declassified CIA documents have even proven this to true. A total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) Training (US$855,000) Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) Source: CIA Tibetan Program wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Costs
    1
  15117.  @samuelboucher1454  And what is mainland China doing to Hong Kong? Look at prosperous Shenzhen in the mainland, just across from Hong Kong and Shenzhen’s economic growth surpassed Hong Kong's in 2017. Source: Shenzhen surpasses US$338 billion GDP mark in 2017, beats Hong Kong and Singapore’s growth scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2128310/shenzhen-88-cent-hi-tech-growth-roll-hit-y2tr-2017 Shenzhen is roughly the same economic size as Singapore and Hong Kong, but recorded nominal output of 2.2 trillion yuan (US$338 billion) in 2017 thanks to its booming hi-tech sector. Over 40% of the output came from “innovative” businesses such as internet, biotech and telecom. And that's despite Shenzhen being under communist party rule, while Hong Kong is suffering under its own democratic government. Look at Tibet Autonomous Region and Chinese workers modernised Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephones, smartphones, The Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Here's a video by WildFilmsIndia showing modern day life in Tibet and its simply not what they expected. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you think Tibet looks like youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo You talked about Chinese government cracking down on underground Christian churches and what's wrong with that? If you are a Christian in China, then you should register yourself with the proper Chinese authorities. I mean, as a atheist Chinese citizen myself, why should unregistered Christians be allowed to worship in underground churches in China? What have they got to hide?
    1
  15118.  @RaginYak  What do you know about Chinese history? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  15119.  @RaginYak  I have shown that 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas to engage in separatist activities against the communist government, and exposed the declassified CIA files. The Dalai Lama even criticised the CIA, saying that America was not actually supporting Tibetan independence, they just wanted to destabilise communist governments. In his 1991 autobiography Freedom in Exile, the 14th Dalai Lama criticized the CIA for supporting the Tibetan independence movement "not because they (the CIA) cared about Tibetan independence, but as part of their worldwide efforts to destabilize all communist governments". Source: CIA Tibetan program wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Criticism In 1999, the Dalai Lama claimed that the CIA Tibetan program had been harmful to Tibet because it primarily served American interests, claiming "once the American policy toward China changed, they stopped their help". This is supported by the fact that after President Nixon's visit to China, USA stopped caring about Tibetan independence. Today, countries all over the world recognise TAR as part of the People's Republic of China, and if you draw the Map of China, Tibet is clearly part of China. The Seventeen Point Agreement is a legally binding agreement affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet, signed by the Tibetans in 1951. In his autobiography, the Dalai Lama states that the Tibetan delegates claimed they were forced 'under duress' to sign the agreement... Their feeling of duress derives from the general Chinese threat to use military force again in Central Tibet if an agreement was not concluded. However, according to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid.
    1
  15120.  @RaginYak  About self-immolations in Tibet, as of 5 June 2017 there have been 148 or so self-immolations reported in Tibet since 27 February 2009. That number is nothing compared to the number of self-immolations in India: as many as 1,451 and 1,584 self-immolations were reported there in 2000 and 2001, respectively. And that's only in a single year in India, whereas those in Tibet occurred over a period of 8 years (2009-2017) so isn't the self-immolation in India much more serious than in Tibet, China? And Tibet has a population of over 3,000,000 so why should majority of Tibetans bow down to the 100 or so Tibetans who self-immolated?
    1
  15121.  @RaginYak  Look at how prosperous TAR is today, there are Tibetan Buddhist monks conducting rituals, Tibetans swinging "prayer" wheels, pilgrims performing full-body kowtows, counting rosary beads, and so on. Video: Lhasa: Life inside Tibet's sacred capital youtu.be/RG2rivR-FxM Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like (By WildFilmsIndia) youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo I mean, have you even been to Tibet and see what life is like there for yourself?
    1
  15122.  @samuelboucher1454  Apparently, you're just a China-hater, harboring extremely negative views of China and don't want to see China succeed that's all.
    1
  15123.  @RaginYak You can't refute my points so you start resorting ad hominem attacks against me for my views? I have cited numerous sources to support my arguments, whereas what exactly have you done to support yours?
    1
  15124.  @RaginYak  I scrolled through your comments and you are inconsistent and illogical with your points while providing hardly any sources to support your argument. What "mountain climbers prove that Tibet is independent"? I've cited the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet 中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议 signed in 1951, affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet, so China has both historical as well as modern claims to Tibet Autonomous Region, what have you actually done to refute this? You brought up Tibetans self-immolations? Only 148 self-immolations over a period of 8 years and somehow, you ignored the rest of Tibet's 3 million population that aren't protesting under communist party rule? About 14th Dalai Lama, I've already cited declassified CIA files showing how much money was paid to fund the training of Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the communist party. And you have nothing to say to this?
    1
  15125.  @RaginYak  That's because Tibet temporarily broke free of Chinese control in 1913 but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951. The National Geographic showed Tibetan flag in 1934 issue, but did any country recognise Tibetan sovereignty at that time? Even the then League of Nations didn't recognise Tibetan independence, they marked the region of Tibet as "colonies of members" as shown in the following map Source: League of Nations member states (note: Tibet is coloured light-blue, indicating that its a colony of member) wikipedia.org/wiki/File:LN_member_states_animation.gif
    1
  15126.  @RaginYak  Look at the Tibetan diaspora in India and they are suffering in poverty, while the 14th Dalai Lama is touring the world and giving speeches. Who's funding the 14th Dalai Lama travels and campaigns? The CIA? Why isn't the 14th Dalai Lama doing anything to improve the situation of Tibetan diaspora in India? Whereas look at how much Tibet has developed under the communist party rule. Even the poorest Tibetan farmer owns a smartphone and can shop online in Taobao for supplies and have them shipped all the way out to Tibet. Because Tibet is part of China after all.
    1
  15127.  @RaginYak  You can't refute my points so you start hurling verbal insults against me for my views? How is this being logical when you choose to attack me personally instead of attacking my points? I cited so many sources, yet you're continually unable to refute my points, so you start hurling insults against me instead.
    1
  15128.  @RaginYak  Japan did not conquer all of China, so please get your facts straight. And Japan today is always welcome to take another shot at invading China like they did during Sino-Japanese War. The People's Liberation Army (world's largest land army) will be ready to defend our country from the Japanese invaders this time.
    1
  15129.  @RaginYak  Japanese Govt sort permission from Tibetan Govt? Japan is out there in the East China Sea, while Tibet is landlocked in the Himalayas, how do you expect Japan to occupy China from the Tibetan front you tell me? How to get Japanese troops to the Himalayas to occupy China from the Tibetan front you tell me? And once again, Tibet broke free of China in 1913, but was eventually reunited with the mainland by 1951, so how does this prove Tibetan independence then? Mountain climbers seeking permission, does not prove a country's independence, just like National Geographic magazine showing Tibetan flag does not. Agreements like the Seventeen Point Agreement are what validates sovereignty. And you're waiting for what? I'm still waiting for your responses to my earlier questions too, but you bring up irrelevant stuff because you're unable to refute my points. So you start attacking me personally instead of attacking my points.
    1
  15130.  @RaginYak  What YouTube taking down your comments? Look at the number of comments you posted and you're blaming "CCP cyber militia" for the dissappearance of your comments?
    1
  15131.  @RaginYak  Look at Tibet when it was under Dalai Lama rule. Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CCP, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    1
  15132.  @RaginYak  Which recognised government or world leader even recognised Tibetan independence today? Does US president Trump talk to Chinese President Xi about Tibetan independence? Does Russian President Putin or German Chancellor Merkel or British PM Johnson or Canadian President Trudeu or Indian PM Modi or Japanese PM Abe or any other world leaders talk to Beijing about Tibet? No, they have accepted that Tibet is part of China and the world recognised Map of the People's Republic of China includes Tibet as part of China.
    1
  15133.  @theraven5850  China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/b8cCsUBYSkw This makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity, some 856.4 billion kilowatt hours a year – more than double the amount produced by Brazil, in second place. The top three is completed by Canada, which produces 376.7 billion kilowatt hours a year. Source: China produces the most electricity from hydroelectric power weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/
    1
  15134.  tarin tarin  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  15135.  @marou1445  Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (national language of China) Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth and they learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America. Why can't China teach Chinese citizens Mandarin Chinese and Chinese history?
    1
  15136.  @ohsehun6470  The Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth so why can't they receive a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (national language of China) Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China? Aren't the Hawaiins, Puerto Ricans and Native Americans considered American citizens, and they learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America?
    1
  15137.  @Tacit_Tern  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    1
  15138. Deleting your Twitter account and possibly target your Patreon, it sounds like a page right out of the U.S playbook, for certain countries to ban RT and Sputnik Radio, as well as taking Russia out of the SWIFT payment. The similarities are uncanny.
    1
  15139. +Dumbledores Army Who is discriminating against ethnic minorities here? Ethnic minorities in China like Uighurs aren't subjected to the One-Child Policy (unlike Han Chinese) and they can have as many kids as they want. Ethnic minorities enjoy special privileges, tax exemption, healthcare, and education bursaries, such as free education for up to university. For example, when applying for university courses, if Han Chinese need 600 points to qualify for a particular course, Uighurs need only 400 points (easier) to apply for the same course in university. Have you actually been to Xinjiang and see how much cities like Urumqi have improved under Han Chinese? Who builds the roads, the streetlamps, the houses, the bridges, plumbing, gasworks and other infrastructure in Xinjiang? Who opens business in Xinjiang and attract investors and tourists to visit Xinjiang? You talk about "intercultural competence" but what makes you think other cultures are equally capable?
    1
  15140. +Dumbledores Army You were the one who mentioned "intercultural competence" in the first place, so what does it mean? Does it mean some cultures are competent and others aren't?
    1
  15141. When the Soviet Union fractured, everybody expected Communist China to follow suite. But China didn't and instead grew to become ever more powerful instead.
    1
  15142.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou who say the Chinese people don't want free internet?" Do you have a survey to support your claim? Because most Chinese netizens are continuing to work with whatever Internet restrictions China has. You said: "Many parts of China have free internet as their governments listen to their people." What seems to be the problem then?
    1
  15143.  @stunningandbrave2520  In 1971, the UN voted to recognize People's Republic of China as "China" and to kick Taiwan out of the UN Security Council. Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The vote results were: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained ... Source: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 Since PRC won the vote with two-thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, recognized the PRC as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" (referring to Taiwan) from the United Nations.
    1
  15144.  @item6931  In 1971, the UN voted to recognize People's Republic of China as "China" and to kick Taiwan out of the UN Security Council. The voting results were 76 in favor, 35 against and 17 abstained. As a result, the UN recognizes PRC as China and removed Taiwan from the UN Security Council.
    1
  15145. Even the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15146.  @farhanaf832  Mao Zedong had proposed a negotiated settlement of the boundary, and that both sides disengage and withdraw 20 kilometres (12 mi) from present lines of actual control. But when Chinese forces withdrew, Nehru use this opportunity to occupy territory that is actual Chinese territory.
    1
  15147.  @MarkYeung1  So has there been any Chinese protest over Internet restrictions? Then it means that majority of Chinese don't have any problems with Internet restrictions. Also, congratulations, you've just proven that the Chinese government does listen to the people through your Example.
    1
  15148.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou There's no question that internet freedoms have deteriorated after the National Security laws. Multiple surveys have backed it." Quote me one of this numerous surveys then.
    1
  15149.  @bartonlee3594  See? mark yeung just gave you an Example of the Chinese government listening to the people's concerns about its zero policy and now China is reopening to the world. Yet you keep on claiming that people in China are afraid of the government.
    1
  15150.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou You completely failed to provide evidence why mainland Chinese people don't want internet freedoms." You said about Chinese taking to the streets to protest the zero policy, but since there are no Chinese protest over Internet restrictions then isn't that already proof? I mean, have you heard of Chinese vlogger Liziqi? Her YouTube channel has more than 2.7 billion views and 16 million subscribers, as verified on 21 August 2021, which is a Guinness World Record for "The most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube".
    1
  15151.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou You completely failed to provide evidence why mainland Chinese people don't want internet freedoms." You said about Chinese taking to the streets to protest the zero policy, but since there are no Chinese protest over Internet restrictions then isn't that already proof?
    1
  15152.  @MarkYeung1  "Beijing government completely failed to address Hong Kong (a part of China) people's requests for democracy and freedoms." Because Hong Kong has their own government separate from mainland China, so how is it Beijing fault? The Hong Kong Chief Executive is voted in by the Election Committee, which consist entirely of Hong Kongers and Beijing does not cast any vote in Hong Kong's election.
    1
  15153.  @MarkYeung1  "Even after 2000000 people peacefully marched on the street." Are those 2 million people still marching in the streets of Hong Kong? No? Then doesn't it show that Hong Kong's issues have since been resolved? On the other hand, have you seen the widespread protests in the Western democratic country of France?
    1
  15154.  @bartonlee3594  "Yes, and I think this is the main reason that most people in Taiwan vote for pro-independence parties now." Actually, the pro-independence DPP suffered a major setback in the last election, until Tsai Ing Wen resigned. On the other hand, the pro-reunification KMT won several major races, including in the capital Taipei. The next Taiwan election in 2024, might even see a KMT victory which would hopefully ease the cross strait tensions.
    1
  15155.  @bartonlee3594  "(which is one reason they use VPNs, even though they are against the law in China)." Who said VPNs are against the law in China? Didn't mark yeung already refute this when he said it is legal to purchase VPN in China?
    1
  15156.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Once people have had a taste of democracy, they always like it. China should try it too!" Taiwan had been under authoritarian rule for more than half its life. For decades, the authoritarian single-party KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, and General Chiang kai-Shek (like you said) was a dictator who jailed/executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But Taiwan's economy flourished under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, resulting in the Taiwan Miracle. Taiwan's GDP grew by 360 percent between 1965 and 1986, earning it a place as one of the Four Asian Tigers/Dragons for its rapid economic growth. Only in the 1990s, when democracy was introduced to Taiwan (because the U.S would cut off weapons supply to Taiwan if the KMT didn't comply with political reforms) that Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Today, Taiwan's economy is stagnant, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising, and Taiwan graduates are seeking jobs in mainland China. Why then should mainland China adopt the Western style democracy that Taiwan has?
    1
  15157.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "And the crackdown/repression of free-thinking in Hong Kong has boosted this trend." Hong Kong is ranked top among the world's freest in many Indices of Freedom. The _Economic Freedom of the World Index gives Hong Kong a top score of 8.91, while Index of Freedom in the World gives Hong Kong SAR a score of 8.81. You said: "Don't you find it ironic that the KMT, originally an anti-PCP party, is now the only party supporting unification now?" Not really, because KMT has always maintained the claim to China, and this includes Taiwan as part of China. Their stance regarding reunification has never changed.
    1
  15158.  @bartonlee3594  The government grants VPN licenses to foreign companies like Apple, Nike, etc, that set up shop in China but require access to Western websites to operate, so how are VPNs illegal? Even Chinese universities have VPN to allow students access to Western research papers for citation.
    1
  15159.  @MarkYeung1  Britain's monarchy coronation ceremony was marred by British protesting chanting "Not My King". After all, Charles was not unelected (even though Britain is a democracy) and yet the British police arrested these protestors. And even in France, there are ongoing protests against Macron's pension reform. Macron did not even put the reform up to a vote, he exercised his powers to circumvent democracy and sign the reform into law, which angered many French workers.
    1
  15160.  @bartonlee3594  The Taiwan Economic Miracle occurred not because of democracy but because of authoritarian KMT rule. Land reforms by the Kuomintang government abolished the landlord class, thus freeing up peasants who, with the help of the state, increased the agricultural output dramatically. Just like in mainland China, Chariman Mao Zedong seized the lands from landlords and redistributed it to the peasants. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Taiwan Miracle) Only in the 1990s when democracy was introduced to Taiwan, did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Today, Taiwan's economy is stagnant, and worker wages aren't able to keep up with rising cost of living in Taiwan. Taiwan’s minimum wage has stagnated for such a long time that the government needs to raise it by two to three times to meet the cost of living or catch up with other advanced economies, including the 27 European Union countries. ... (Source: The News Lens: Taiwan’s Wages Are So Low Because Business Profits Are Too High)
    1
  15161.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "And Taiwan is MUCH RICHER than China on a per capital basis, as you well know, I'm sure." That's because mainland China has the world's largest population at 1.4 billion. So on a per capita basis, if you divide China's GDP by our enormous population, then of course mainland China's GDP per capita is much lower than Taiwan island (of whom only has a population of 23 million). Look at the world's most populous democracy, India for example, and China's GDP per capita is six times higher than India's.
    1
  15162.  @bartonlee3594  "Yes Mas, He knows stuff. But he always parrots the PCP party line. He is not a free-thinker." I've substantiated my argument with various articles to illustrate how I arrived at my views. But it seems that whenever you're unable to counter my points, you start resorting to ad hominen attacks against me, instead of attacking my views.
    1
  15163. ​ @bartonlee3594  "..without locking up or harassing citizen for disagreeing with the government. Japan, South Korea, and many other rich countries come to mind here." Haven't you heard of South Korean dictator Park Chung hee? During his rule, Park began a series of economic reforms that eventually led to rapid economic growth and industrialization, now known as the Miracle on the Han River, giving South Korea one of the fastest growing national economies during the 1960s and 1970s. But in 1972, Park declared martial law and introduced the highly authoritarian Yushin Constitution, and political opposition and dissent was now constantly repressed. Park ruled South Korea as an authoritarian dictator, and remains a controversial figure in modern South Korean political discourse and among the South Korean populace in general. While some credit him for sustaining economic growth, which reshaped and modernized South Korea, others criticize his authoritarian way of ruling the country (especially after 1971) and for prioritizing economic growth and social order at the expense of civil liberties and human rights. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Park Chung Hee)
    1
  15164.  @bartonlee3594  So Taiwan's GDP per capita is higher than mainland by virtue of Taiwan's lower population (23 million) compared to the mainland (1.4 billion) then what's your point?
    1
  15165.  @bartonlee3594  "And afterward, once a middle-class, urban citizenry had been created, these new wealthy citizens started DEMANDING DEMOCRACY." But Taiwan's economy flourished under authoritarian KMT dictatorship, then why fix what isn't broken? KMT was forced to implement political reforms because the U.S would cut off weapons supply to Taiwan if the KMT continued on its single-party rule. Then how can you claim that it's the demand of the people of Taiwan? It's like you think all political systems have to adopt Western democracy, while ignoring the success that some authoritarian systems have achieved.
    1
  15166.  @bartonlee3594  "And afterward, once a middle-class, urban citizenry had been created, these new wealthy citizens started DEMANDING DEMOCRACY." But Taiwan's economy flourished under authoritarian KMT dictatorship, then why fix what isn't broken? KMT was forced to implement political reforms because the U.S would cut off weapons supply to Taiwan if the KMT continued on its single-party rule. Then how can you claim that it's the demand of the people of Taiwan?
    1
  15167.  @bartonlee3594  Not only did Taiwan flourished under KMT rule, but like I said, South Korea also flourished under S. Korean dictator Park Chung hee. Yet you used South Korea as an example of having top-down economic planning (build roads, hospitals, infrastructure) without locking up or harassing citizen for disagreeing with the government? You never actually looked up South Korea's history didn't you? Before using it as an example?
    1
  15168.  @bartonlee3594  North Korea has a low population, but did you forget that North Korea has been heavily sanctioned, and its economic growth has stymied as a result? Then of course N. Korea's GDP per capita is going to be lower, despite having a smaller population. Also, the difference in population size between N. Korea and S. Korea/Taiwan is smaller than the difference between mainland China's and Taiwan island's.
    1
  15169.  @bartonlee3594  You mentioned Japan as an example of "having top down economic planning without locking up or harassing citizens for disagreeing with the government". But Japan's industrialization occurred earlier than South Korea and Taiwan island. Japan's modernization began during the Meiji Restoration after Emperor Meiji (of which the era is named after) restored practical imperial rule to Japan after the end Tokugawa shogunate. Among the political reforms Emperor Meiji implemented was the abolishing of the Samurai class (who served the various shoguns) which led a series of riots from disgruntled samurai, leading into civil war between the newly formed Imperial Japanese Army and the samurai remnants. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Meiji Restoration) So what makes you claim Japan and South Korea had top-down economic planning without locking or harassing citizens? I've refuted your point using South Korean dictator Park Chung hee and Japanese Emperor Meiji.
    1
  15170.  @bartonlee3594  Since I've mentioned Taiwan, South Korea and Japan, did you know the even Singapore (one of the Four Asian Tigers) also industrialized under the authoritarian rule of the PAP? For 57 years, the PAP ruled Singapore with an iron fist, and Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore's founder) was a dictator who jailed/exiled dissidents and political rivals. Yet Singapore flourished under authoritarian PAP rule, transforming from a sleepy fishing nation, into a world-class country surpassing many of its regional neighbors in quality of living. So what makes you think that every country has to adopt Western-style democracy to be successful? China found success with our political system and it works for China, then why abandon such a system to adopt Western-style democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    1
  15171. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  15172.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou My point about per capita GDP is merely that it measures total economic output for a nation divided by the number of citizens who live there." Well, that's literally the point I made, and you're just copying it. And since we both know that mainland China has a far larger population than Taiwan island, it's a given that China's GDP per capita would be lower than Taiwan's. As for North Korea, I've already stated that N. Korea is under sanctions, so even if China helps, there's only so much than Chinese companies can do with those sanctions in place. If only the sanctions were lifted, that would allow more Chinese companies to invest in N. Korea, probably build roads, railways, highways, etc, and further develop their country.
    1
  15173.  @bartonlee3594  Earlier you wrote: "You can have top-down economic planning (build roads, hospitals, infrastructure) without locking up or harassing citizen for disagreeing with the government. Japan, South Korea, and many other rich countries come to mind here." but again, haven't you heard of South Korean Dictator Park Chung hee? Why did you assume that South Korea's development was under democracy instead of an authoritarian dictator?
    1
  15174.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou Again, as I said, when countries get rich, they evolve into democracies. It will happen to China too in the near future." China has survived 5,000 years of history without ever adopting Western-style democracy, then what makes you think it will happen to China in the near future? China has always been under the authoritarian rule of a strong centralized government in the form of Emperors and the Imperial Court, and the current system under the Communist Party of China closely emulates China's ancient system. Why then, should China abandon this system (that works) just to adopt Western style democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    1
  15175.  @bartonlee3594  "Yes, this particular country got its start in development as a dictatorship." Then why'd you include South Korea as an example of a country that developed without locking up or harassing citizen for disagreeing with the government? It just goes to show that you didn't study this country's history before claiming that it developed without an authoritarian government. "Japan and many others did not. You don't need repression by your government tl develop." Japan first developed under the authoritarian imperial rule of Japanese Emperor Meiji. The Meiji Restoration was the start of Japan's modernization, and Emperor Meiji introduced political reforms like abolishing the Shogunate and the Samurai Class, which lead disgruntled samurai to stage a rebellion in Japan. So how is Japanese modernization an example?
    1
  15176.  @bartonlee3594  "Taiwanese citizens are about three times richer than mainland Chinese citizens" Mainland China has more billionaires than Taiwan island. Taiwan only has 45 billionaires while the mainland has 440 billionaires. So from this, it can be said that mainland Chinese are richer than Taiwanese citizens. You said: "Per capita GDP is a good is a much better measure of wealth than total GDP." Per capita GDP doesn't factor in the cost of living. The cost of living in the mainland is (generally) lower than in Taiwan island. Food is cheap in China, so is water, gas and electricity (especially since China is importing Russian gas at a discount) whereas the cost of living in Taiwan is high, and their wages are stagnant. Taiwan’s minimum wage has stagnated for such a long time that the government needs to raise it by two to three times to meet the cost of living or catch up with other advanced economies, including the 27 European Union (EU27) countries. ... (Source: The News Lens: Taiwan’s Wages Are So Low Because Business Profits Are Too High)
    1
  15177.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Western sanctions did not create this disaster." Well, why don't the West lift those sanctions on North Korea then? Chinese companies want to invest in N. Korea and build infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, etc, and improve the quality of life of N. Koreans, but they can't do much with those sanctions in place.
    1
  15178.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou Meiji restoration was the BEGINNING of democracy in Japan" The Meiji Restoration occurred under the authoritarian rule of Japanese Emperor Meiji (of whom the era takes its name after). The feudal era of the Daimyo and Shoguns.was abolished and power was consolidated and restored to the Imperial Family, so how is this a democracy?
    1
  15179.  @bartonlee3594  Since I've shown that countries like South Korea and Japan had actually industrialized under authoritarian leadership of South Korean Dictator Park Chung hee and Japanese Emperor Meiji, then I take it that your statement about "You don't need repression by your government tl develop." is untrue? Then why should China abandon our current system under the CPC and adopt Western-style democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    1
  15180. Even the United States of America has acknowledged that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China. Where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence then?
    1
  15181.  @bartonlee3594  If you retain the belief that Japan and South Korea industrialized under democracy, instead of under authoritarian rule of Park Chung hee and Emperor Meiji (as I've illustrated) then it appears that we would have to agree to disagree after all.
    1
  15182. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  15183.  @bartonlee3594  About countries expressing different viewpoints, why then is Russia not allowed to express their viewpoint in the West? For example, RT News and Sputnik Radio are banned in EU, and Russians are finding it difficult to travel to EU due to the strict Schengen VISA requirement. Then how are ordinary Russians going to get their voices heard in the West?
    1
  15184.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou In my own view, I have clearly shown that all countries, when a middle-class develops, become democratic." And I have refuted this, using Singapore as an example of a high-income country that has remained authoritarian even till today. The single-party PAP government has governed Singapore for 57 years with no change in government, (much like how China has been governed by the CPC for 72 years.) Another example is Saudi Arabia being a high-income country that is still governed by an absolute monarchy where the King is both the head of state and government. It's true that you and I disagree about several things, but I believe I provided concrete examples that counter your argument, especially when your arguments use very broad strokes such as claiming all countries must become democratic. When this is clearly not the case in reality, so why should China abandon our political system (that works for us) and adopt Western style democracy?
    1
  15185.  @bartonlee3594  Emperor Meiji is an emperor (for crying out loud), which means Japan was a monarchy, not a democracy, during the Meiji Restoration period, which marked the beginning of Japan's modernization. Furthermore, you've specifically said that countries can develop without locking up or harassing citizen for disagreeing with the government, but even during the Meiji Restoration, the disgruntled Japanese Samurai rebelled after the Samurai class was abolished, so isn't this a prime example of Japanese citizens disagreeing with the Meiji government? Yes, you and I disagree about several things here, but I've elaborated in detail how South Korea was modernized by South Korean dictator Park Chung hee, and how Japan was modernized by Emperor Meiji. Both modernizations occurred under authoritarian rule, not democracy, yet why'd you include them in "countries that developed without locking up their citizens?"
    1
  15186.  @bartonlee3594  Earlier you brought up the North Korean facing "its second major famine in three decades," then wouldn't you agree with me that the priority is to save Korean lives by lifting sanctions and sending food to starving people in that country? I'm sure Chinese companies could help alleviate the shortage of food in N. Korea, but their hands are tied due to the sanctions. Surely you and I can both agree on saving lives by sending food to starving people in N. Korea at least?
    1
  15187.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou Singapore is a democracy, my friend." "Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. ... (Source: Human Rights Watch: Singapore) So doesn't Singapore's political system sound remarkably similar to China's? And in which year did the PAP lose an election? The PAP has been governing Singapore for its entire life, for 57 years, much like how the CPC has governed China for 72 years. And the fact that Saudia Arabia is a middle-high income country governed by an absolute monarchy already deconstructs your entire argument.
    1
  15188.  @bartonlee3594  So if you agree that RT should not be censored in the West, then have you protested about that?
    1
  15189.  @bartonlee3594  "it bends to the will of the people. The CPC could do the same thing if the Princeling Class wasn’t afraid of the Chinese citizenry." What makes you think the CPC doesn't? In 2022, Beijing wanted to implement a vax mandate, but scrapped the idea after backlash from Chinese netizens. Whereas the Canadian Truckers protesting over mandates had their bank accounts frozen by the Canadian government.
    1
  15190.  @bartonlee3594  "it bends to the will of the people. The CPC could do the same thing if the Princeling Class wasn’t afraid of the Chinese citizenry." What makes you think the CPC doesn't? In 2022, Beijing wanted to implement a vax mandate, but scrapped the idea after backlash from Chinese netizens. Whereas the Canadian Truckers protesting over mandates had their bank accounts frozen by the Canadian government.
    1
  15191.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou Have you ever been to Singapore? I used to live there." So who voted for Halima Yacob, the current President of Singapore? How can Singapore be considered a democracy when the President of Singapore wasn't elected into power? Ai Weiwei is a Chinese dissident, not a Singaporean dissident. Whereas Francis Seow was one, and he wasn't allowed to return to his country. PAP may lose ground, but it doesn't change the fact that Singapore has been under PAP for 57 years, much like China being under the CPC for 72 years. Also, I've quoted Human Rights Watch view that "Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive and their citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly" so by claiming Singapore is a democracy, are you saying that HRW is wrong in their assessment of Singapore? You said: "it bends to the will of the people. The CPC could do the same thing if the Princeling Class wasn’t afraid of the Chinese citizenry." What makes you think the CPC doesn't? In 2022, Beijing wanted to implement a V-mandate, but scrapped the idea after backlash from Chinese netizens. Whereas the Canadian Truckers protesting over mandates had their bank accounts frozen by the Canadian government. As for Saudi Arabia, the lower class people have risen to become middle income (even high income) and yet Saudi Arabia is still an absolute monarchy, so how does your analysis that middle-class people want democracy? It throws your entire argument off.
    1
  15192.  @bartonlee3594  Are you saying you disagree with Human Rights Watch's assessment of Singapore? Here is what HRW says: Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. The government has aggressively enforced a sweeping “online falsehoods” law that permits government ministers to order the “correction” or removal of online content. - Human Rights Watch: Singapore You've said that you used to live in Singapore, that means you lived in a country with an overwhelming repressive political environment (according to Human Rights Watch), yet you're claiming Singapore is a democracy?
    1
  15193.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "The South China Sea is in international waters..." Who says that the South China Sea is in international waters? Look up any Map of International Waters, and the SCS is not considered international waters.
    1
  15194.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Singapore IS A DEMOCRACY." Halima Yacob, the current President of Singapore is unelected and no one voted her into power, then how can Singapore be a democracy? You said: "No books are banned there." Wrong. There are 32 books banned in Singapore. (Source: Wikipedia: List of books banned by governments) You said: "No one will be arrested for criticizing the Lee dynasty." Wrong. Singapore dissident, Amos Yee, uploaded a video on YouTube criticizing Singapore's founder, Lee Kuan Yew, and was arrested by the Singapore police. You said: "As I mentioned, Chinese dissident art is on display in the galleries there." Like I said, Ai Weiwei is a mainland Chinese dissident, not a Singaporean dissident, then what does it prove? Singaporean dissidents like Amos Yee were arrested for criticizing the Lee dynasty.
    1
  15195.  @bartonlee3594  Who are you to demand answers out of me? You've never answered my questions, yet you demand I answer your questions? Like with Saudi Arabia for example, you claim your analysis still stands, but your analysis is "middle-income people want democracy", but Saudi Arabia is a high/middle-income country, and yet it's ruled by an absolute monarchy. Another question you've had not answered is about North Korea. You suddenly bring up North Korea's famine, then I asked you wouldn't you agree with me that the priority is to save Korean lives by lifting sanctions and *sending food *to starving people in that country? (This reminds me of another post, in which you asked me whether I disagreed with Chinese nationalists, and I replied that I disagree with those that want war between U.S and China. Yet you still claim I don't answer your questions?)
    1
  15196.  @bartonlee3594  What's the name of this Arbitral Tribunal? China made a declaration in 2006 in accordance with the Convention, to exclude compulsory arbitration on sovereign disputes and maritime delimitation. Many countries including the United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, France, Canada, and Spain had made similar declarations of their own. Also, by approaching this unnamed Tribunal, Phillippines had violated the 2002 Declaration of on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea, which stipulated that border disputes should be resolved bilaterally (country to country) instead of through third party arbitration.
    1
  15197. ​ @bartonlee3594  Earlier you claimed that the South China Sea is in international waters, but I've looked up various Maps of International Waters, and the SCS is not marked as international waters. Could you show me a map that actually shows that the SCS is in international waters as you claimed?
    1
  15198.  @bartonlee3594  "Criticizing the government is dangerous under an authoritarian state." Tell that to Amos Yee, a Singaporean dissident who was arrested after uploading a video on YouTube criticizing Singapore's founder, Lee Kuan Yew. Yet you still boast that Singapore is a democracy? When the President of Singapore is not elected as in Halima Yacob's case?
    1
  15199.  @bartonlee3594  "When you live in an authoritarian state, criticizing your own government can have bad consequences for people." No, it happens even to Western democracies. For example, Australian citizen Julian Assange is imprisoned just for exposing the U.S monitoring its allies activities. Edward Snowden is another example, and he's an American fugitive for exposing global surveillance programs run by the Five Eyes.
    1
  15200.  @bartonlee3594  "Nationalists do not ever criticize their own government." We've already gone over this in another post. I disagree with Chinese nationalists who want war between China and the U.S. You even replied that you know of no such nationalists who want war, so I responded with the example of PLA Navy Admiral Luo Yuan (罗援).
    1
  15201.  @bartonlee3594  "When you live in an authoritarian state, criticizing your own government can have bad consequences for people." No, it happens even to Western democracies. For example, Australian citizen Julian Assange is imprisoned just for exposing the U.S monitoring its allies activities. Edward Snowden is another example.
    1
  15202. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, even the U.S acknowledges that.
    1
  15203. 轮子只靠黑中国吃饭。
    1
  15204.  @bartonlee3594  Turns out that the arbitral tribunal that conducted the South China Sea ruling was made by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), which is not an official UN agency, unlike say the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Since the ruling was made by a non-official UN agency, then China reserves the right not to adhere to its decision.
    1
  15205.  @bartonlee3594  You claimed that the South China Sea is in international waters, but if you look up the Map of International Waters, the SCS is not marked as international waters. Could you show me a map that actually shows that the SCS is in international waters as you claimed?
    1
  15206.  @bartonlee3594  Vietnam PM Pham Van Dong had recognized that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic note he wrote the Chinese premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. ... (Source: Wikipedia: 1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai)
    1
  15207.  @bartonlee3594  It's blatantly obvious that you do not respect my opinion at all, why pretend that you do? You've been repeating the same claim that you respect my opinion, only to turn around later and tell others that you don't.
    1
  15208.  @bartonlee3594  How can you possibly claim to respect my opinion, only to do the exact opposite in your next post? Why pretend to respect my opinion when it's apparent that you don't?
    1
  15209.  @bartonlee3594  It's obvious that you don't respect all opinions. You've been repeating the same line again and again, then why pretend that you respect all opinions?
    1
  15210.  @bartonlee3594  You didn't post anything to me for 2 days, why should I respond? You keep on saying that you respect my opinion but its apparent that you don't and in your next post you do the exact opposite.
    1
  15211.  @bartonlee3594  Tell that to Singaporean dissident Amos Yee, who uploaded a video to YouTube criticizing Singapore's founder Lee Kuan Yew and got arrested. Yet you claim Singapore is a democracy? When the President of Singapore, Halima Yacob is unelected?
    1
  15212.  @bartonlee3594  Well, why'd you wrote: "神州 Shenzhou You have suddenly gone silent here." then? I am not a full-time internet entity, so why are you expecting responses from me when there none from you?
    1
  15213. China has been providing data to the best of its ability. What China opposes is the apparent politicization of the virus origins by the West.
    1
  15214.  Beast Mode  Who said I never said nothing back? Did you read my comment?
    1
  15215.  @Andy-P  Yeah I responded to Beast in this thread, but he claims that I didn't. As for cut & paste, sometimes the same question deserves the same answers.
    1
  15216.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou Me too... sometimes I respond the same answer." Since you yourself admit to "cut & paste" yourself, why'd you highlight it as attribute of mine? "I see you responding so often on China issues." Yeah, because many Westerners (but not all) appear to have misconceptions of China that are different from the reality in China, so I usually post on such channels that offer a different view from the Western MSM take on China. "How many hours a day do you spend doing this - if you don't mind me asking?" About a couple of hours each day. Maybe a bit more if the topic is interesting. How'd about you?
    1
  15217.  @jasonbaxter3658  So you can do 80% of what you want to do, then how are you ever going to beat the coronavirus when your lockdown is only 20%? Might as well not do a lockdown and your results will be the same.
    1
  15218.  @junebug8485  China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia-like illness on 31 Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020, China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain and by 11th Jan 2020, China had sequenced Covid-19 genome and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid onto their shores, but the West just squandered it.
    1
  15219.  @junebug8485  What coverup? China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia-like illness on 31 Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020, China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain and by 11th Jan 2020, China had sequenced the virus genome and shared the information with WHO.
    1
  15220.  @junebug8485  The American CDC tested American blood samples dating back to 14 Dec 2019, and detected the presence of covid antibodies. If it takes around 3 weeks for an infected person to develop antibodies, that means the virus was present in America at least in Nov 2019. Yet it wasn't America that reported this virus but China?
    1
  15221. Wait, I thought China is going to be the 3rd to retrieve lunar samples, apart from USA and the old Soviet Union. Haven't USA compared their lunar samples with USSR's sample and found any difference?
    1
  15222.  @ne0ge049  America has 4% of the world's population but is home to 25% of the world's Covid-19 cases, yet you want to talk about the country with plenty of viruses?
    1
  15223. Even Hollywood plays a part in getting people to hate Russia. I can't remember the last time a Russian was portrayed in a positive light on the silver screen.
    1
  15224. +Simon The government supports unification of Korea, but any unification should be done by Korean themselves, without USA interference. You say China secretly support North Korea, but China doesn't even have any military bases in North Korea, whereas South Korea is host to US military bases. How can proper unification occur at all, when foreign powers like USA are actively stationed in South Korea? China has always supported peaceful unification of Korea, but it is North Korean missile testing and USA sending warships and aircraft carrier strikegroups from other side of the globe that is escalating tensions in the region. So what can China do about this at all? North Korea seems target US military bases in South Korea and Okinawa Japan. Chinese government can't do anything about those, and USA choosing withdraw its troops from those territories, would contribute more to easing tensions in Korean peninsula, than any sanctions China could ever impose on North Korea. The government is only agreeing to sanctions now to punish N. Korean missile test during BRICS that's all, but it is not trying to push North Korea over the edge into outright war in East Asia.
    1
  15225. +Simon The Sunshine policy adopted by South Korea was good attempt mend relations, but it was probably USA that cast a shadow over it. USA did not support that policy as President Bush had called North Korea an "Axis of Evil". Soon afterwards, South Korean leadership was replaced in 2008, and the policy was discontinued, which pleased USA. Next year in 2009, North Korea began its nuclear missile testing. I can't speak for North Korea, but it is most likely they saw South Korea's new leader attempting to placate its relations with USA. USA also probably has an interest to keep Korea divided. Like I mentioned previous, while China has no military base in N. Korea, S. Korea is host to some 28,500 American soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines in S. Korea. If Korea was unified, USA would be forced withdraw its forces from Korea, losing strategic region against China in East Asia. No one can predict whether a unified Korea will side with China or USA, but China is regional neighbor, whereas USA is on other side of the globe. Historically, Korea was unified country under Joseon dynasty, but after Japanese conquered it and was defeated, Korea was suddenly divided into North Korea (USSR) and South Korea (USA). North Korea emerged in a superior position during that period and while you consider it an invasion by North Korea, they saw it as civil war to reunify Korea. How can a country invade itself? Are the North and South separate sovereign countries or just halves of a single country? Who gives foreigners the right to decide divide a unified country just like that? North Korea almost succeeded in unifying Korea (about 90%) but then USA joined the Korean War (which should have been internal civil war, decided by Koreans) against it, and pushed it all the way back, past the 38 parallel and into North Korean territory. When USA and S. Korean forces was at the doorsteps of China, did China finally intervened because we did not want another US puppet like Japan. And lastly, China could probably easily solve this problem by invading N. Korea and annexing it as part of China, and through development, modernize N. Korea to modern standards. USA wouldn't protest such invasion by China against US enemy. S. Korea might protest, but it would torn between N. Korea who is enemy, but is part of Korean territory, and China who is foreign invader of Korea, but attacking S. Korea's enemy. Ultimately, S. Korea might even welcome Chinese invasion of N. Korea. But China wouldn't do that, because it damage reputation and relations with Korea. Assassinate Kim also doesn't automatically mean N. Korea will install Chinese puppet. Look at Kim killing his uncle and half-brother to foil Chinese attempts to control N. Korean leadership. Installing a puppet is not easy, and even then the "puppet" may not be accepted by the people. Look at USA cutting of the heads of countries in Middle East (Gaddafi, Saddam Husein, etc) and installing their own US puppets. In the end, the situation is not improved significantly.
    1
  15226.  @mage9825  Corruption is a universal phenomena, and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But under President Xi Jinping's anti-corruption campaign, more than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption including over 120 high-ranking officials, including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders. But when is the last time a country like the United States had an anti-corruption campaign of their own?
    1
  15227. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15228. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15229. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  15230. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15231. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China..
    1
  15232. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China if you read its constitution.
    1
  15233. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China...
    1
  15234. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.....
    1
  15235. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15236. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15237. Did Vietnam war lasted so long? Vietnam war lasted about 8 years but has already ended. Meanwhile, USA wars in Middle East have been going on for 15 years with no visible end in sight.
    1
  15238. According to washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/study-iraq-afghan-war-costs-to-top-4-trillion/2013/03/28/b82a5dce-97ed-11e2-814b-063623d80a60_story.html The US wars in Middle East cost taxpayers estimated $4 trillion to $6 trillion. Just for comparison, China owns about $1 trillion dollars of US national debt, so imagine how much richer US would have been, if it hadn't involved itself in wars in Middle East.
    1
  15239.  real balance  About the so-called "1 million Uighurs in detention" where do you get this figure of 1 million? Turns out this figure came from 2 dubious sources, one of which only interviewed 8 Uighurs on what their estimated number of Uighurs in re-education schools were, and then they extrapolated the figure to arrive at the figure of 1 million Uighurs in detention. Source: Claims that China has detained millions of Uyghur Muslims are based largely on two studies. A closer look at these papers reveals US government backing, absurdly shoddy methodologies, and a rapture-ready evangelical researcher named Adrian Zenz. thegrayzone.com/2019/12/21/china-detaining-millions-uyghurs-problems-claims-us-ngo-researcher/ While CHRD states that it interviewed dozens of ethnic Uyghurs in the course of its study, their enormous estimate was ultimately based on interviews with exactly eight Uyghur individuals.
    1
  15240.  @svetoslavpp  Which Canadian law did Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou (and the CEO's daughter) broke, you tell me? Meng was arrested in 2018 and its already 2020 and still her case hasn't concluded? What have Canadian authorities been doing for the last 2 years? Just trying to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride that's all. Anti-China sentiment is growing in the West, look at all those racially-motivated attacks against Asian Americans (Asian Canadians, Asian Australians, Asian Europeans, etc) because American politicians like Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo choose to refer to the virus by it's improper name. Video: Asian Americans face discrimination in wake of the coronavirus youtu.be/t_IyTxRNUYk So please don't act like the West actually welcome Chinese (like China welcome Westerners as visitors) even Western anti-China media constantly paint negative image of China and "demonise" our country.
    1
  15241.  @IdeaBoxful  Unilateral opinions? In 1971, the United Nations countries democratically voted to recognise People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 as China and to kick Taiwan (Republic of China) 🇹🇼 out of the UN. The United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The poll results were as follows: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting Source: Voting results of UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Voting_res_2758.svg So since PRC won the two-thirds majority vote, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, recognized the People's Republic of China (PRC) as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed the collective representatives of Chiang Kai-shek from the United Nations. So the UN countries democratically voted to recognise PRC as China, what unilateralism are you talking about?
    1
  15242.  @Nesher92  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  15243.  @Nesher92  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    1
  15244.  @Nesher92  In 2016, China completed world's largest radio telescope, the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) also known as Tianyan (天眼 'Eye of the Heavens'). The 1,650-foot-wide dish was built in China's Guizhou Province and will help scientists learn more about the universe's early days, detect low-frequency gravitational waves and hunt for signals that may have been produced by distant alien civilizations. Source: China Finishes Building World's Largest Radio Telescope space.com/33357-china-largest-radio-telescope-alien-life.html The larger the radio dish, the more sensitive it is to picking up signals from space and FAST's potential to discover an alien civilization will be 5 to 10 times that of current equipment, as it can see farther and darker planets. Video: FAST: The World's Largest Telescope | A China Icons Video youtu.be/7SRV3rnULO0 How can Taiwan or Hong Kong possibly hope to compete with the sheer power of the mainland?
    1
  15245.  Taiga Hiiragi  Uighurs in Xinjiang aren't kidnapped, they're receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (national language of China) Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China. The Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth after all and they learn essential job skills to help prepare them eventually for the workforce. Video: A look at vocational education and training programs in Xinjiang youtu.be/Hb4v7g6yM0Y
    1
  15246.  @quekjoseph8156  Mankind's first unmanned aerial vehicle was either the kite (invented in China) or the hot air balloon (also invented in China). With Chinese invention of paper, came inventions like paper lanterns, paper umbrellas and paper banknote (which made business transactions easier since merchants need not carry around lots of metal coinage and precious stones) Mankind's first aviation was in the form of paper kite, and even hot air balloons were invented in China, and were known as Sky Lanterns (天灯) or Kongming Lanterns (孔明灯) Here is beautiful video of RISE Lantern Festival in Las Vegas, celebrated with Chinese Sky Lanterns. (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience) Video: youtu.be/SNtwlBbBdb4?t=10
    1
  15247.  @quekjoseph8156  Ancient Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions?
    1
  15248.  @quekjoseph8156  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  15249.  @quekjoseph8156  SG Yahoo News? Singapore has under the authoritarian single-party rule of PAP for their entire life as a nation. For 55 years, the People's Action Party ruled Singapore with an iron fist, and Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore's founder) was a dictator who tolerated no dissent to his rule, jailing and expelling Singapore dissidents (like Francis Seow). Doesn't Singapore's political system sound similar to how China has been governed by CPC for 74 years?
    1
  15250.  @quekjoseph8156  So why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, as well as CPC's right to rule the mainland.
    1
  15251.  @quekjoseph8156  According to your Hot Air Balloon Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_air_balloon#History A precursor of the hot air balloon was the sky lantern (simplified Chinese: 孔明灯; traditional Chinese: 孔明燈). Zhuge Liang of the Shu Han kingdom, during the Three Kingdoms era (220–280 CE), used these airborne lanterns for military signaling. Ancient Chinese invented gunpowder and gunpowder weapons like handcannons, handgrenades, fragmentation bombs, landmines, naval mines, exploding cannonballs, rocket launchers, multi-launch rockets, and of course, fireworks. Americans celebrate the 4th of July with Chinese inventions, and world's oldest conformed surviving firearm is the Heilongjiang 黑龙江 handcannon, manufactured no later than 1288. Source: Heilongjiang hand cannon wikipedia.org/wiki/Heilongjiang_hand_cannon A 14th-century military treatise, the Huolongjing (Fire Dragon Manual), describes hollow cast iron cannonball shells filled with gunpowder. The wad of the mine was made of hard wood, carrying three different fuses in case of defective connection to the touch hole. Source: Landmine wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_mine#Gunpowder Chinese records tell of naval explosives in the 16th century, used to fight against Japanese pirates (wokou) wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_mine#History Source: The earliest rocket launchers documented in imperial China consisted of arrows modified by the attachment of a rocket motor to the shaft a few inches behind the arrowhead. wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket_launcher#History Source: The first multiple rocket launchers were made during the mediaeval Chinese Song dynasty. wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_rocket_launcher#History
    1
  15252.  @quekjoseph8156  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    1
  15253.  @quekjoseph8156  China has inducted the world's first operational anti-ship ballistic missile, a "carrier killer" capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, known as the DF-21D. Video: China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile youtu.be/p-cEunmqXM8 The DF-21D is capable of targeting aircraft carrier strike groups out in the open ocean, from the safety of the land. The DF-21D is launched from land-based mobile launchers and flies high up into the stratosphere, using its advanced maneuverability to avoid interception by anti-missile defenses below, before falling at hypersonic speeds (above Mach 20) The warhead is even capable of terminal guidance, making last minute adjustments to its trajectory just seconds before impact.
    1
  15254.  @quekjoseph8156  The USA did not help China enter the World Trade Organisation. When the WTO was founded in 1995, China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate our country as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because the United States, European countries, and Japan requested that China first reform various tariff policies, including tariff reductions, open markets and industrial policies. Thats why China had a late entry in to WTO in 2001 instead of being a founding member of WTO in 1995. Because USA and their allies posed obstacles to China's entry into WTO.
    1
  15255.  @quekjoseph8156  When the Japanese invaded Manchuria in 1931, Chiang kai-shek of the KMT refused to meet the Japanese invaders, instead he continued purging communists (our own fellow Chinese) until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap Chiang and force him to ally with the communists against the invaders. This incident was later known as the Xi'an incident (西安事变) Source: Xi'an Incident wikipedia.org/wiki/Xi%27an_Incident#Negotiations_and_release Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was thanks to communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release, that he lived to fight against the Japanese.
    1
  15256.  @quekjoseph8156  Why do you keep on saying "Pls. Pls. Pls." in your responses? If you think you're being polite, you certainly aren't. And the Japanese refused to surrender even after 2 atomic bombings by the USA, the U.S bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed Japanese civilians, women, children, the elderly, and men unfit for active military duty. The vast majority of Japanese military strength remained largely unaffected by the atomic bombings, that's why Japan refused to surrender. The last campaign fought of WWII was the Soviet invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria that finally caused Japan to surrender. So if anything, we should be thanking the Communist Party of the Soviet Union for ending WWII.
    1
  15257.  @quekjoseph8156  And you have literally proven my point that USA did not help China enter the WTO. I mean, what has the World Trade Organisation even got to do with political events happening inside China? What the heck? It's not the World Political Organisation, it's the World Trade Organisation, so what has political events within China even got to do with China wanting to be a founding member of WTO in 1995? Instead, China had a late entry into WTO in 2001, because the USA posed obstacles to China's entry. And you have just proven this point. It's not because China didn't want to join WTO (we applied for the predecessor afterall) but it's just that USA make use of "political events" in China to pose a barrier to China's entry into a economic organisation. I mean, imagine this scenario where USA wants to (re)join the World Health Organization, but imagine that because of the January 6th Capitol Hill riots, US (re)entry was somehow blocked. I mean, what's the link between political events and (re)joining a health organisation? Just like what has political events in China even got to do with joining a trade organisation?
    1
  15258.  @quekjoseph8156  Why do you keep saying "Pls. Pls. Pls."? It's being condescending rather than being polite when you keep using it. And why couldn't China join WTO in 1995 when it was first founded, instead China had a late entry into WTO in 2001? If USA and their allies didn't obstruct China, we would be a founding member of WTO in 1995, instead of having a late entry in 2001. And look at the number of WTO disputes USA has, compared to China. Go to WTO website on dispute settlement ( wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_maps_e.htm ). The USA, EU and China have the following number of dispute cases as complainant and respondent: United States: 131 cases as complainant, 165 cases as respondent. European Union: 102 cases as complainant, 94 cases as respondent. China: 22 cases as complainant, 43 cases as respondent. Source: Map of disputes between WTO Members wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_maps_e.htm Therefore, USA has had more than 100 cases as complaint and respondent, the EU has about 100 of each, whereas China doesn't even have 50 of either.
    1
  15259.  @quekjoseph8156  Aggressive? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    1
  15260.  @bradparker1020  A long time Harvard University survey showed that estimated 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. Source: Harvard survey finds Chinese satisfaction with govt rises china.org.cn/china/2020-07/17/content_76281590.htm Grassroots officials were also rated far more as "problem solvers" and "concerned with the difficulties of ordinary people" and far less as "beholden to the wealthy" and "only concerned about their own interests" by the end of the study, which was released last week by Harvard's Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation.
    1
  15261.  @alicejyi4705  "神州 Shenzhou china means R.O.C, not P. R. O. C" If China means ROC 🇹🇼 then why did the ROC lose the mainland to the PRC 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? Even in the United Nations, the UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the UN General Assembly Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The poll results were as follows: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting Since the PRC won two-thirds majority vote, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971 and recognized the People's Republic of China (PRC) as the only legitimate representative of China to the UN and removed the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek from the UN.
    1
  15262. China has helped build infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, schools, hospitals, hotels, shopping centers, football stadiums and telecommunication projects in African countries. With the recent growth and economic improvement, more Africans students are returning to Africa after studies abroad in order to bring their skills and industry home.
    1
  15263. I also recommend CGTN: A voice from Taiwan, China: Liu Xin speaks to Huang Chih-Hsien.
    1
  15264. When Russia sent a military intervention into Crimea and annexed it from Ukraine, all the USA did was impose sanctions on Russia that's all. Why do people think USA will go to war with China over Taiwan then?
    1
  15265. Dew Drops So the US retaliation only comes years after Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine? Then what makes you think that it is a fact that the war will spread to South China Sea?
    1
  15266. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15267. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  15268. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15269. Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15270. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15271. According to its own constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15272. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its own constitution.
    1
  15273. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  15274.  @niahma3494  Study and discipline in early life, is an investment into the child's future. There are party-going people who grow up regretting that they didn't pay more attention in school.
    1
  15275.  @chozer1  So why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet despite their numerous advantages, they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the Communists' right to rule the mainland.
    1
  15276. @nationalghost About democracy, why do you allow ordinary people to participate in political decisions that will affect the country's future? Ordinary people may know how to vote responsibly (e.g. they do not turn up to vote) or they may make decisions base on emotions not logic (e.g. Many British don't like foreigners, so they vote for Britain to exit EU) or they may simply lack political awareness or be easily influenced by foreigners (Russian interference in U.S Elections) Why not let the people who know how to govern, govern?
    1
  15277. @nationalghost Dr. Sun Yatsen did not truely believe in democracy. In the whole Republic of China era (1911-1949), only 2 elections were ever held by KMT, so what makes you think ROC was a democracy you tell me? And Taiwan had been ruled by authoritarian single-party KMT for more than half its life, and Chiang kai-Shek was a brutal dictator who jailed and executed many dissidents and political rivals during White Terror But Taiwan flourished under authoritarian single KMT rule, resulting in Taiwan Miracle. Only when democracy was introduced did Taiwan's economy began to slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving to find job opportunities abroad, such as in Mainland China or in Singapore for example.
    1
  15278. @nationalghost You brought up the connection between innovation and political freedom. Using a non-China example, the Soviet Union was communist, yet they achieved much innovation especially in the realm of space exploration. For example, the first satellite in space was Russian Sputnik-1, the first man in space was Russian Cosmonaut, Yuri Gagarin, and the first space station was Soviet Salyut-1. This shows that innovation is still possible despite a country having an authoritarian system, like USSR being communist. Therefore, what makes you think democracy is somehow necessary for innovation?
    1
  15279. @nationalghost China is world's 3rd country to independently send people into space, after USA and USSR. Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program through Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtube.com/watch?v=tIviKg4Mduw China is the first Asian country to achieve independent human spaceflight, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, India, etc, have not conducted manned space missions of their own. China is helping make Asians proud by showing that Asians are just as capable of achieving equally impressive feats as Westerners.
    1
  15280. @nationalghost About 5G, China conducted the world's first 5G remote surgery on test animal. The doctor is located some 50 km away from the operating theater, using robotic arms to operate on a test animal and remove its liver. Video: China completes world’s first 5G remote surgery in test on animal youtube.com/watch?v=yFR61jjL1vo
    1
  15281. ​@nationalghost In 2016, China completed world's largest radio telescope, the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) also known as Tianyan (天眼) 'Eye of the Heavens.' The 1,650-foot-wide dish was built in China's Guizhou Province and will help scientists learn more about the universe's early days, detect low-frequency gravitational waves and hunt for signals that may have been produced by distant alien civilizations. Source: China Finishes Building World's Largest Radio Telescope space.com/33357-china-largest-radio-telescope-alien-life.html The larger the radio dish, the more sensitive it is to picking up signals from space and FAST's potential to discover an alien civilization will be 5 to 10 times that of current equipment, as it can see farther and darker planets. Since its trial operations began in 2016, China's radio telescope has discovered 44 new pulsars, which are a type of solar phenomena in which a rapidly rotating star emits radiation periodically (like some sort of "cosmic lighthouse" if you will) Video: 44 pulsars identified by China's FAST telescope youtube.com/watch?v=t9nySMjiUzw
    1
  15282. @nationalghost Shanhai's Hongqiao Station is getting super-fast 5G coverage. The current 4G network is too slow for the major railway hub, which handles over 330,000 passengers daily. The next-generation mobile system will allow passengers to access data much faster and 5G will also help users connect with robots in the station. Video: Shanghai’s Hongqiao train station to be the world’s first offering 5G coverage Video: youtube.com/watch?v=FSAEoBiX2-Y
    1
  15283. @nationalghost China's first 5G-based remote surgery took place in Sanya, Hainan. The 3-hour surgery was performed on a patient suffering from Parkison's disease. Hainan-based doctor Ling Zhipei controls the surgical instruments 3,000 km away in Beijing through a 5G network and successfully implanted a deep brain stimulation in the patient. Video: Doctor performs China's first 5G surgery on human brain youtube.com/watch?v=qiZrWx51zp0
    1
  15284. @nationalghost China is world's 3rd country to launch space stations into orbit, after USA and USSR. Tiangong-1 (天宫一号) was China's first prototype space station launched in 2011, followed by Tiangong-2 in 2016. There was even a "space lecture" by Chinese taikonaut demonstrating simple micro-gravity experiments in space on board Tiangong-1 to her students directly on the ground below Video: Chinese teacher in space gives lecture to her students youtube.com/watch?v=OUAuZnpoZ58 Thorough this, we are teaching our kids, and future generations of Chinese, that China is both an ancient civilization, as well as a modern space nation, capable of achieving equally impressive feats as Westerners. Why should Asians consider ourselves inferior to Westerners? We should at least see ourselves as equal to Westerners and work hard to try and achieve the same accomplishments they did. Unless you remove this misconception that Westerners are somehow better than Chinese, then as a Chinese you'll never free yourself from this bondage imposed by Westerners upon you. You as Chinese will always see yourself as inferior.
    1
  15285. @nationalghost In 2011, China conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut (Chinese astronaut) exited the Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft and ventured into outer space, making China the world's 3rd country to conduct extravehicular activity in space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtube.com/watch?v=9PAkbT4kTpI&t=280 China is the first Asian country to achieve such a feat, and even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted spacewalks of their own. China is showing the world that Asians as just as capable of matching Westerner's achievements in space.
    1
  15286.  @sojuscrimestats  No problem. It's good to always keep learning.
    1
  15287. @technacul  "Infrastructure to extract raw materials." China has built infrastructure that enables people in Africa to travel and visit different places, not purely for extracting raw materials only. "China is going to meddle in its own way"
    1
  15288. ​ @merlinbotha363 China is home to many of the world's highest bridges, longest bridges and tallest bridges. List of highest bridges 1. Duge Bridge (China) 2. Sidu River Bridge (China) 3. Puli Bridge (China) 4. Jin'an Bridge (China) 5. Yachi River Bridge (China) ... List of longest bridges 1. Danyang–Kunshan Grand Bridge (Mainland China) 2. Changhua–Kaohsiung Viaduct (Taiwan, China) 3. Kita–Yaita Viaduct (Japan) 4. Tianjin Grand Bridge (Mainland China) 5. Cangde Grand Bridge (Mainland China) ... List of tallest bridges 1. Millau Viaduct (France) 2. 1915 Canakkale Bridge (Turkiye) 3. Pingtang Bridge (China) 4. Husutong Yangtze River Bridge (China) 5. Yavuz Sultan Selim Bridge (Turkiye) ...
    1
  15289. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15290.  @zlonewolf  You said: "there are also 1000x more gas cars than EV." The NHTSA calculated the number of fires per billion miles travelled by gas cars and EVs, not by the number of each car. So it doesn't matter whether there are more gas cars than EVs, since the calculation uses per billion miles travelled.
    1
  15291.  @tooltalk  "The average age of vehicles on the road today are 12.5 years compared to EV's 3.5 years." If we match the EV's age to be as old as gasoline vehicles, it's possible that older batteries may be more susceptible to fires. But depending on the technology, some EVs opt for swapping out empty batteries for a fully-charged battery. This means batteries are constantly renewed after each use.
    1
  15292.  @tooltalk  "What nonsense is this? sodium is a potential placement for low energy dense, cheap batteries for ESS, not for EVs" That's for ordinary sodium-ion batteries, but I'm talking about solid-state sodium-ion batteries.
    1
  15293. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15294. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  15295. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15296. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  15297. Its their own website's fault to allow creation of accounts without verifying where the user is from in the first place. They creating a bulletin board then of course people will be attracted to sign up to post messages there. If you want to control the flow information, then you'll need forum moderators, forum watchdogs, filtering systems and other forms of censorship, otherwise users are just going to post whatever they want.
    1
  15298.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "The locals in here tell me they don't look down on Chinese," Just because the locals in Canada told you they don't look down on Chinese, doesn't mean that they don't. Who will honestly tell someone "I look down on your race." right to your face? Of course, they secretly do it behind your back, not tell it in front of your face.
    1
  15299.  @MarkYeung1  Anti-Asian discrimination is on the rise in Canada, with reports of discriminatory incidents more than tripling over the last year, according to a new study from U of T Mississauga. Source: Anti-Asian discrimination on the rise in Canada, says UTM sociologist utm.utoronto.ca/main-news/anti-asian-discrimination-rise-canada-says-utm-sociologist The study launched in April 2020 with an online survey of 700 Chinese respondents living in Canada. About 11 per cent of respondents indicated that they had experienced incidents of discrimination since the start of the pandemic. Preliminary results from a second survey conducted in early 2021 revealed a sharp rise in discriminatory experiences. Reports more than tripled over the past year, up from 11 per cent in April 2020 to more than 35 per cent in early 2021. This is study conducted by research group in Canada, not just opinions of local people telling you that they don't look down on Chinese.
    1
  15300.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Not surprisingly, many more Chinese move to Canada than Canadians move to China." Obviously. Because the population of Canada is 37 million, whereas the population of China is 1.4 billion. The bigger population country will obviously see more locals immigrating to the other countries. While a smaller population country is less likely have people migrate towards a bigger population country. And about arbitrary arresting people for political purposes, the Canadians arrest Meng Wanzhou, even though Meng did not break any Canadian laws while in Canada, so who are Canadians to tell China not to do what Canadians have done to Huawei CFO?
    1
  15301.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "put the Canadian government on an impossible situation." What do you mean impossible situation? Simply put Meng Wanzhou on the first flight back to China if the Canadian government wants China to reconsider releasing the two Canadians. The solution to this stalemate is so simple, just release Huawei CFO, how's that an impossible situation?
    1
  15302.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Meng lives in a luxury mansion, while the 2 Michael's are in a dark cell with no lawyers." I don't understand, what has whether a detainee lives in a luxury mansion or a jail cell even got to do with his or her conviction? Conviction is conviction, China is under no obligation to house the 2 detained Canadians in luxury mansions, what is the meaning behind your logic?
    1
  15303.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Canada had extradition agreement with the US." A total of 111 countries have signed extradition treaties with the U.S., and dozens among them received extradition requests, but none of them followed through on this ridiculous idea, until Meng entered Canada. Source: Canada the only country willing to detain Huawei CFO: Chinese diplomat news.cgtn.com/news/2020-09-05/Canada-the-only-country-willing-to-detain-Huawei-CFO-Chinese-diplomat-TxrPEnTnUs/index.html From September to December 2018, Meng traveled to France, Britain, Ireland, Poland, Singapore, Japan and Belgium. All seven countries are having a bilateral agreement on extradition with the U.S. Canada was the only one that helped the U.S. government in this kind of dirty game. …… So if Canada chooses to follow through with this US extradition request, when 7 other countries with extradition treaties with USA choose not to do so, then Canada brought this upon themselves.
    1
  15304.  @AlphaQ922  The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  15305.  @AlphaQ922  Tibet was historically part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty China and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Source: Map of Yuan Dynasty images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/04/yuan.jpg Source: Map of Qing Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/06/f114660d2bf5452994135c4c.gif
    1
  15306.  @AlphaQ922  The Uighurs in Xinjiang are receiving free education, uniform, textbooks, they aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want, so what genocide are you talking about? Even when applying for university courses, if Han candidate needs 600 points to qualify for a certain degree, then Uighur candidate needs only 400 points (easier to qualify) for the same course, so Uighurs enjoy an admission advantage over Han when it comes to applying for university degrees.
    1
  15307.  @wolfwanker6196  How many 50¢ have you given away so far? If you accuse everyone who says positive things about China, then you're going to be broke in no time.
    1
  15308.  @valeenoi2284 You're saying 100's of millions starved to death in China back during 50's? China's population in 1950s was around 500 million, so you're saying that China lost more than 20% of our population? Then why is China currently the country with the world's largest population at 1.4 billion people? During 1960–2015, the population grew to nearly 1.4 billion. Under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. So Europe and America took 200 to 300 years of capitalism, this begs the question: how many people died because of capitalism? What is the global death toll of capitalism? How many workers starved to death in poor working conditions since the Industrial Revolution in 1700-1800s? How many wars started because countries like Japan were eyeing China's resources because of capitalism? Many Westerners are eager to denounce the deaths under communism but reluctant to take a look at the death toll of capitalism. Even today, capitalism is killing people under Covid-19, as countries like USA and India rather sacrifice lives to save businesses. Whereas China's response to Covid-19 is to sacrifice businesses to save lives. As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  15309.  @huangcc72  If you want to talk about prison populations then it's actually America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate So statistically speaking, you're more like to get arrested in the USA than in China, based on the statistics.
    1
  15310.  @huangcc72  You asked "why so man highly educated Chinese people, rich men or even CCP officials want to immigrate to US or other countries?" Because China is the country with the world's largest population that's why some people want to immigrate out of China. With such a huge student population, competition for top schools and higher education is extremely fierce and intense here in China. Some students unable to apply for local universities, so they may choose to study abroad (especially if their parents have $$$) because of fierce competition in China. Have you ever tried sitting for the Gaokao 高考 in China? Some corrupt rich people or communist party officials made their filthy wealth in China, and now with President Xi Jinping's anti-corruption campaign, many corrupt officials are attempting to flee to USA and other countries, buying up property in other countries so that the corruption money can't be traced back to them. But the government is expanding the anti-corruption drive to catch corrupt officials who fled overseas. Source: China hunting 10 'foxes' in Australia as part of corruption afr.com/world/china-hunting-10-foxes-in-australia-as-part-of-corruption-crackdown-20150423-1mr7t3 crackdown
    1
  15311.  @coderelease9145  China choose not to publicise the number of PLA soldiers who died in the China-India border clash, because doing so will stir up anti-India sentiment among Chinese and possibly lead to escalation of conflict with India. Look at Indian media publicising the deaths of Indian soldiers, leading to rising anti-China sentiment in India, as Indians boycott/destroy Chinese goods (they are hurting themselves in the end). China is benefiting from what's called constructive opaqueness, whereas India is suffering from destructive transparency.
    1
  15312.  @huangcc72  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA in all 3 subjects: reading, mathematics and science. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    1
  15313.  @coderelease9145  Had China revealed the number of PLA soldiers who died in the Sino-Indian border clash, that would only stir up anti-India sentiment among Chinese, so what practical good will that accomplish? Look at Indian media painting the Indian soldiers who died as martyrs and generated anti-China sentiment among Indians, resulting in protests and mass boycott/destroying of Chinese goods, how's that productive in any way? A conflict between China and India would not be in either country's interest, so isn't it in our best interests to de-escalate conflict between our countries? Of course, the PLA soldiers who died in Sino-Indian conflict will be privately honored by their families and friends, but there is no need to give an actual death toll when it serves no purpose, except to escalate conflict.
    1
  15314.  @coderelease9145  Who said that the border belonged to India? Indian PM Narendra Modi publicly stated that: "Chinese troops did not enter Indian territory and no posts were taken" so how was the conflict started by China, you tell me? Source: 'China did not enter our territory, no posts taken’: PM at all-party meet on Ladakh clash hindustantimes.com/india-news/chinese-troops-did-not-enter-our-territory-says-pm-modi-at-all-party-meeting-on-ladakh-standoff/story-QGgGUyL3sVRYB7mp3Y8bBI.html
    1
  15315.  @huangcc72  "神州 Shenzhou You must be kidding. China is so great that they can't even build more universities for students?" Chinese universities produce the most STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) out of any other country in the world. Countries With The Most STEM Graduates 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/02/02/the-countries-with-the-most-stem-graduates-infographic/ This implies that China is going to play a much larger role in the STEM fields, given the sheer number of graduates produced in these fields. Yet China has to host the world's largest student population, obviously not every student in China can qualify for local universities, that's why they apply for studies abroad.
    1
  15316. @UCeYSyu4gWocMwpl9rkvVf3A Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  15317.  @theJAFOreport  So you just proven that there's a limit to freedom of speech in Canada when Trudeu administration passed that transgender protection law. Thanks for proving my point.
    1
  15318.  @huangcc72  You said: "just tell me why Chairman Xi's daughter studied abroad and don't want to go back to China even after graduated?" President Xi's daughter graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree in 2014 and has since returned to China. As of 2015, she is living in Beijing, so what are you talking about? She returned to China after graduation.
    1
  15319.  @theJAFOreport  It basically means that using the wrong gender pronouns can be classified as a hate crime against transgender people if they don't identify with that gender. That means encroachment of freedom of speech, since you can't call a person whose every cell contains the male chromosomes (YX) as a him, because he identifies as a her.
    1
  15320.  @namelesssnitchy  China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    1
  15321.  @muhdazrif4795  "Btw I'm from asean we dont like China and america so much. Many asean preferr Japan" During WWII, Imperial Japan had committed warcrimes atrocities in ASEAN countries like Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, yet why would ASEAN countries prefer Japan? How are Japanese more naturally inclined towards a win-win situation?
    1
  15322.  @pierremarel  Furthermore, you claim Vietnam actually own those islands, but if we take the Paracel Islands for example, it's clearly China that owns it. China even open up the Paracel Islands to tourism, and vacationers can go diving, windsurfing and even get married at the church on one of the islands. Sansha City on Woody Island, (the biggest of the Paracels) is home to a community of 1,500 residents complete with a school, a police station and a court. A five-day cruise aboard a 10,000-ton boat that stops at Yinyu Island, Quanfu Island and Yagong Island is now popular with couples who want tropical-themed wedding photographs but cannot afford Bali or Hawaii. So in how is it that Vietnam owns the Paracels you tell me?
    1
  15323.  @pierremarel  "神州 Shenzhou > I am not disputing the historical and legitimate rights for China to redeem HKG but underlining China’s “change of tone”" Since both of us agree that Hong Kong is historically part of China, but was taken by the British after the Opium Wars, then shouldn't it be that Hong Kong adopts the same governing system as the mainland after the 1997 handover? Surely Beijing reserves the right to determine the governing system of Hong Kong, why is it left up to British (and other foreigners) to determine how Hong Kong political system should be run? I mean, no other country in the world allows multiple political systems to exist within its borders, China is the only country in the world that allows One Country, Two Systems policy. A comparison would be like North and South Korea agreeing to unify as a single country (Korea), yet allow both the North and South to keep their respective governments.
    1
  15324.  @petersinclair3997  "神州 Shenzhou Nearly, OK. The Opium deans had existed for centuries." Well, could you show me an example of an Opium den earlier than 1800s? You said: "China was a province." China a province of what? Qing Dynasty China?
    1
  15325.  @pierremarel  Previously before 1997, Hong Kong was under the authoritarian rule of Britain, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy, and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong while it was a British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote for their favorite leaders. So isn't it thanks to the One Country, Two Systems policy that Hong Kong people finally get democracy, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    1
  15326.  @pierremarel  "2. China is not finished building its military force." The Opium Wars, Boxer Rebellion and Japanese invasion of China have shown that a big country with a weak army (like China was at that time) would invite invasion from foreign powers like Britain and Japan. During the Boxer Rebellion for example, many Chinese wanted foreigners to get out of China, yet Eight Nations (i.e Germany, Britain, France, the United States, ... and even Japan) formed an alliance to invade China, loot our wealth and kill Chinese in our own lands. There were also widespread cases of raping of Chinese women, and hundreds of Chinese women and girls committed suicide to avoid a worst fate at the hands of the Allies during the Boxer Rebellion. Chinese territory was divided up and given to the 8 Nations, there's this famous French cartoon of China being carved up like a pie and served to the Allies. If anything, this reinforces the need for a big country like China to have a strong military to serve as deterrent against potential invaders. Otherwise a big country with a weak military will only have our territories seized and taken from us. You said: "Please give it another 30 years as per your leader (President Xi Jinpin) stated and envisioned during the 100th anniversary of the CCP." What did President Xi stated and envisioned during the 100th anniversary of the Communist Party of China? The rejuvenation of the Chinese Civilization?
    1
  15327.  @pierremarel  "神州 Shenzhou > Listen, I really enjoy having a discussion with you." Same here. I want to learn why is it you think that way. For example, why is it you think Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines do not “occupy” but actually own the islands in the South China Sea? Whereas when it comes to China, those islands are occupied and not owned? There's clearly a double standard between the way you view Vietnam, Malaysia and Philippines' claims against China's claims. You said: "But what strikes me is that you leave no room for a fair and critical assessment of China’s policies and foreign strategy, as if it was a forbidden territory." Did I leave no room for discussion? I'm not telling others to shut up or anything like that, so am I really obstructing a fair and critical assessment of China's policies? You're always welcome to say your piece. You said: "But wait … do you actually have access to free speech?" Free speech is defined differently in different countries. Of course, if we are using racial slurs (like the N-word against African Americans) and other derogatory terms, then there is a limit to what people can or cannot say in public.
    1
  15328.  @phongphong4742  In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Phạm Văn Đồng, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958.
    1
  15329.  Beast Mode  Americans don't even want to put boots on the ground to defend Ukraine, yet you want to put more soldiers in Taiwan?
    1
  15330. @comment sense Socialism literally fights for those without power, it's capitalism that seeks to extract a profit from workers and hoard the nation's wealth for themselves. And about doing weird things, did you know that Americans in Florida eat roasted bat?
    1
  15331. @comment sense Agreed that resources are limited. Capitalism seeks to exploit the resources in pursuit of profit, overproducing goods and unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the end goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the planet! Yet despite modern advances, we still have starving people in the world, homelessness, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, how come? Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford them. Whereas Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" (German: Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen) Had we been living under communist/socialist system, then our limited resources would be distributed according to those who need them most urgently. It's the socialist systems that care about issues like homelessness, illiteracy, affordable healthcare, starvation, whereas capitalists only see profit and nothing else.
    1
  15332. @comment sense About better quality products, capitalism only cares about quality if the capitalists can turn a profit. Previously, many products like televisions, refrigerators, appliances, mobile phones were built to last for decades, but because capitalists found that this business model simply wasn't profitable, because they'll no longer be making money after you bought their product. So capitalists now deliberately made products that last only a few years, so that consumers need to keep on buying their products. This is also very wasteful especially with the Earth's limited resources.
    1
  15333. @comment sense About better quality products, in the past, many products like televisions, refrigerators, appliances, mobile phones were built to last for decades, but because capitalists found that this business model simply wasn't profitable, because they'll no longer be making money after you bought their product. So nowadays, products are built to last only a few years sot that consumers continually need to buy new products to replace old products. This is also very wasteful since resources are limited.
    1
  15334. @comment sense About the farmer and the weeds, under socialism, the entire ecosystem is taken into account, and even weeds have their uses, such as holding the soil firm, providing habitats for beneficial organisms, and thereby contribute significantly to natural and biological control of some insect pests. Certain weeds also make nutritious food or fodder, possible attracting grazing animals and restoring their habitats. The farmer may be poor, but surely he has enough to feed himself and his family, and get to enjoy the beautiful forests and the company of nature. Whereas under capitalism, the farmer seeks to maximise the crop yields in pursuit of greater profits, so after multiple harvests, the soil may become depleted of nutrients and grow infertile over time. The farmer then seeks to create more arable land, through methods such as deforestation; cutting/razing down forests to make space for more farmland. The end result is the eventual depletion of the Earth's resources, all in pursuit of profit.
    1
  15335. @comment sense The Earth's resources are indeed limited I agree. Under capitalism, there is no regard for sustainability, nor welfare of the workers, nor the environmental impact. It's the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, with the end goal being the eventual depletion of the Earth's resources. It's a pity, because our modern industrial capabilities allow us to produce enough food, medicine, houses, schools, for everyone on the planet. Yet we still have starving people, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to adequate healthcare. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs". Imagine if we had a system that distributes material needs according to the urgency. Look no further than the unequal global distribution of Covid-19 vaccines. Rich developed countries are buying up and hoarding the vaccines (which is in scarce supply) leaving little to none for the poorer developing nations.
    1
  15336. @comment sense The Earth's resources are indeed limited I agree. Under capitalism, there is no regard for sustainability, nor welfare of the workers, nor the environmental impact. It's the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, with the end goal being the eventual depletion of the Earth's resources. It's a pity, because our modern industrial capabilities allow us to produce enough food, medicine, houses, schools, for everyone on the planet. Yet we still have starving people, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to adequate healthcare. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs". Imagine if we had a system that distributes material needs according to the urgency.
    1
  15337. @comment sense Firstly, I specifically said weeds are great for other uses, such as holding the soil firm, providing habitats for beneficial organisms, and so on. Secondly, I also said some weeds are edible, such as watercress and kangkong (Ipomoea aquatica) both of which I personally have eaten as vegetables, but are often classified as weeds in other countries.
    1
  15338. @comment sense In the entire world, every one of our products no longer last as long as they used to in the past. TVs, refrigerators, home appliances, even simple electronic devices like earphones, computer mouses, keyboards, don't last as long as they used to. Because capitalists want their customers to continue buying more of their products, so they deliberately shorten the life-spans of their products. Not only that, when a device like your smartphone or earphone gets broken/damaged, most people would just buy a replacement, because capitalism has made the cost of buying a new product cheaper than fixing/repairing broken devices. This is wasting the Earth's resource, since you are consuming more resources by buying a replacement, rather than fixing the broken device.
    1
  15339. @comment sense Of course Karl Marx knows that resources in this world are limited, that's why we as humans living on the planet should be prioritizing sustainability and minimizing waste. Capitalism seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, even going so far as to make it cheaper to manufacture a new product from scratch, to replace a broken device rather than fixing it. This has led to a "throwaway society" where people buy brand new replacements rather than fix stuff that's broken, necessarily increasing waste and consumption of the Earth's resources.
    1
  15340. @comment sense Karl Marx knows that resources in this world are limited, that's why we as humans living on the planet should be prioritizing sustainability and minimizing waste. What capitalism seeks to do is to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, even going so far as to make it cheaper to manufacture a new product from scratch, to replace a broken device rather than fixing it. This has led to a "throwaway society" where people buy brand new replacements rather than fix stuff that's broken, necessarily increasing waste and consumption of the Earth's resources.
    1
  15341. @comment sense Resources in this world are indeed limited, that's why we as humans living on the planet should be prioritizing sustainability and minimizing waste. What capitalism seeks to do is to deplete the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, even going so far as to make it cheaper to manufacture a new product from scratch, to replace a broken device rather than fixing it. This has led to a "throwaway society" where people buy brand new replacements rather than fix stuff that's broken, necessarily increasing waste and consumption of the Earth's resources.
    1
  15342. @comment sense Marx knows that no one possibly works harder than the proletariat (i.e workers). The employees are the lifeblood of the economy, driving forth production, yet they are paid a meager wage by their employers which mathematically isn't equal to the amount of work they've contributed. I mean, if employers paid employees salaries that are equal to the amount of output they generate, then there would seriously be no profit. That's why no employer will hire an employee if they can't make more money than they can pay them. Employers will only employ you, if they can extract more work, time (or brainpower, manpower, etc) out of you, then the salary that they've offered you for the job. So if the end of the day, if you as a worker feel as though you've been ripped off by your boss, that you've being paid less than what you contribute to your work, well you're absolutely right. Your labour (as Marx puts it) has been exploited. Karl Marx theorized this as "Exploitation of Labour"
    1
  15343. Agreed that resources are limited. Capitalism seeks to exploit the resources in pursuit of profit, overproducing goods and unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the end goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the planet! Yet despite modern advances, we still have starving people in the world, homelessness, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, how come? Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford them. Whereas Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" (German: Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen) Had we been living under communist/socialist system, then our limited resources would be distributed according to those who need them most urgently. It's the socialist systems that care about issues like homelessness, illiteracy, affordable healthcare, starvation, whereas capitalists only see profit and nothing else.
    1
  15344. @comment sense It's not just a matter of supply and demand, the whole system is rigged. Employees don't get to choose whom they work for, their entire survivability falls upon them finding a job, and every employer is only going to hire an employee when they know that they can extract more time, energy, brainpower, manpower, than whatever salary they choose to pay them. As for starting their own business, they'll need capital to achieve just that, by which they would become the very thing that continues to exploit labour
    1
  15345. @comment sense It's not just a matter of supply and demand. Employees don't get to choose whom they work for, their entire survivability falls upon them finding a job, and every employer is only going to hire an employee when they know that they can extract more time, energy, brainpower, manpower, than whatever salary they choose to pay them. As for starting their own business, they'll need capital to achieve just that, and that's how the cycle of capitalism repeats itself endlessly.
    1
  15346. @comment sense Firstly, I never said fixing things didn't consume resources, but its a fact that fixing a broken item consumes less of the Earth's limited resources than manufacturing an entirely brand new replacement. Fabricating an new product requires more raw materials extracted from the Earth than fixing a pre-existing product, and it also costs fuel and time to transport the finished product from factory to customer all the same. Additionally, fixing a product at the most entails fabricating a certain part compared to the whole thing. And if the repair is successful, you wouldn't have to throw away your old product now that it's fixed, whereas buying a new replacement not only consumes more resources, but also turns your old product into waste. Again, it's because capitalism has made manufacturing a replacement cheaper than fixing a broken product, but it's all being done at the Earth's expense.
    1
  15347. @comment sense The problem when you start a business making products that are built to last for decades instead of just years, is that such a business model is less profitable compares to business models that shorten the lifespans of their products. Customers may actually like your product that can last longer, but because you are no longer earning profits decades after your customer bought you product, you won't earn as much as the business model with shortened product lives. Additionally, a long-lived product is actually beneficial in reducing pollution and the exploitation of the Earth's limited resources, whereas while a short-lived product is more profitable, constant manufacturing enacts a greater toll on the Earth's environment and the depletion of its resources. All because of capitelism.
    1
  15348. @comment sense It's apparent that you've demonstrated only a rudimentary understanding of Karl Marx's teachings. Labor is cheap because capitalistas are constantly attempting to shrink worker wages in order to skim off a larger profit margin for themselves and accumulate capital over time. That's why employers hire employees when they can extract more time, energy, etc from the worker than the salary they pay them. Karl Marx believed that capitalism can't possibly be the end product of humanity's development. It's too inhuman, too unfeeling, lacking empathy and consideration for welfare of humanity as a whole. Even though it has brought about great advancement of science of technology, it's primary pursuit is still profits, even at the expense of the environment, the Earth's resources and their eventual depletion. Marx believed there must be a more humane, more efficient allocation of the limited resources of this Earth. How is it we can have the mega rich as well as the starving, the homeless and the illiterate all living on this same planet? Shouldn't there be a better distribution of all our available resources, where they can do the most good?
    1
  15349. @comment sense So I take it you're unable to refute my point that employees don't get to choose their employers? Because you suddenly switched from employees choosing to employers choosing, which is not the point, the point was that the entire survivability of employees hinges upon them finding a job, whereas employers can always choose to hire an employee when they know that they can extract more time, energy, brainpower, manpower, than whatever salary they choose to pay them. It's because you've been raised with a capitalistic way of thinking, which prizes profit at the expense of everything else, including welfare, the environment, the Earth's limited resources, etc.
    1
  15350. @comment sense The fact that capitalism has made the production of a product much cheaper than fixing a broken product is creating unnecessary waste as well as increasing necessary consumption of the Earth's limited resources. Whether cheaper or not, the customer's choice to buy replacements is harming the Earth more than choosing to fix a broken item. Because at the end of the day, a successfully fixed item is made whole and usable again at minimal consumption of resources, whereas buying a brand new replacement costs the resources needed to make a new product, and it generates waste in the form of the broken old item.
    1
  15351. @comment sense Toyota or Honda can lasting 20 years is only a few years more than the 15 years average of a car's lifespan. But if you try making television sets, refrigerators, (or even just earphones) that last for decades, you're going to run into problems because even though customers are happy in buying your product, you aren't making profit compared to a business model which shortens the lifespan of products.
    1
  15352. @comment sense It's apparent that you only have the most superficial understanding of Karl Marx's teachings. Both you and I agree that resources are limited in this world, so the ultimate priority is to conserve resources as much as possible, and invest in sustainable alternatives. This is opposed to capitalism, which seeks to overproduce products in pursuit of profits, whether by shrinking worker wages to skim off a larger profit margin, or at the expense of the environment, with the end result being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. I've already gone through several examples explaining how capitalism actually harms the environment through unnecessary consumption of resources and unnecessary creation of waste, but you just dismiss everything because you cannot come up with any good arguments for capitalism, other than the "strong eat the weak". If left unchecked, the strong are going to consume all of this world that we live in, then who's going to continue living on this planet? Why not explore alternative systems that prioritize welfare of people and a sustainable system? Capitalism is the reason why Earth's climate is changing, have you seen the amount of CO2 emissions since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution some 200-300 years ago during 1700-1800 AD which was around the time capitalism began to make its effects known.
    1
  15353. @comment sense Look, both of us at least agree that Earth's resources are limited. So why on Earth should we continue on this path, allowing the strong to hoard resources, while the weak to suffer? Because as we've argued, that is precisely how kapitalism operates, why not seek a more sustainable model that attempts to limit further consumption of resources, while distributing the current wealth more evenly among poorer people? Communism is the belief that resources should be allocated according to needs.
    1
  15354. ​@comment sense "神州 Shenzhou i heard some people in china crying unfairness." Indeed, China has a divide between the rich and the poor (brought on by kapitalism) so now President Xi Jinping proposes the policy of "Common Prosperity" in order bridge the income gap, by connecting Western China (i.e Xinjiang, Tibet, etc) to the more prosperous Eastern port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guandong, through the Belt and Road Initiative, in order to spread the wealth from East to the West. You said: "the weak shrink and the strong grow. that is how the world works." But does it always have to be that way? It seems like you're just resigned to your fate, just letting the strong grow while the weak shrink. Why not attempt change instead of just giving in to your fate?
    1
  15355.  @JVideos618  Yes, I find it hilarious. But my preference is towards discussion, rather than making fun of the usernames of others.
    1
  15356. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou Can China compete with USA?" China is literally the world's factory, everything is Made-in-China nowadays so what makes you think China cannot compete with the United States? Chinese workers work hard to make products such as smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, clothing, sneakers, cheap so that the cost of living in America is kept lower than it should be. Think about the millions of dollars Americans save on living expense over the years, thanks to affordable Chinese good. You think American workers can compete with Chinese workers?
    1
  15357. @comment sense You said: "CHINA'S SELF CENTEREDNESS ---> CHINA'S COLLAPSE." China focus on improving our internal situation in life everyday, so how will that be China's collapse? On the other hand, the United States rather focus on other country's internal situation, rather than solve America's woes such as inflation, rising food and gas prices, gun control, lack of affordable healthcare. In fact, many Chinese are optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead, whereas in contrast, many Americans tend to be pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    1
  15358. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou the rich contribute more. that is why people pay them more. the poor contribute less, that is why people pay them less." That's what kapitalism has taught you to think. Poor people often work multiple jobs at a time, it is their hands that arguably contribute the most to society's progress, whether its manufacturing stuff, constructing buildings, even maintenance of our streets, our sewers, our plumbing, electricity lines, or ferrying people to work everyday through taxis, buses, trains, and so on. What exactly do the rich people contribute to society that compares to what the poor people do? The rich profit at the expense of workers' labors.
    1
  15359. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou CHINA'S PROBLEMS HAVE MANY LAYERS. THE MOST FUNDAMENTAL ONE IS ATHEISM. ATHEISM TEACHES THERE IS NO GOD." Well, China is officially atheist under the Communist Party of China, but what exactly has some mysterious entity up above ever done for China or for Chinese people, that we should worship it so? I mean, Islamic countries promote Islam in their lands, while Christian countries do the same with Christianity in their lands, then cannot there exist a country that promote atheism as well? Imagine the possibilities of an atheist country, with on science and technology while getting rid of outdated superstitions that may hinder progress. One where the citizens concentrate on finding real solutions and improving oneself, rather than leave it all up to faith and the hands of fate. There is this phrase in Chinese: 世上没有从天而降的英雄，只有挺身而出的凡人。 which translates to: "There are no heroes falling from the sky in this world, only ordinary people who step forward." which means we shouldn't depend on the heavens to help us, the true heroes are those who step up to the challenge.
    1
  15360. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou CHINA'S PROBLEMS HAVE MANY LAYERS. THE MOST FUNDAMENTAL ONE IS ATHEISM." Well, China is officially atheist under the Communist Party of China, but what exactly has some mysterious entity up above ever done for China or for Chinese people, that we should worship it so? I mean, Islamic countries promote Islam in their lands, while Christian countries do the same with Christianity in their lands, then cannot there exist a country that promote atheism as well? Imagine the possibilities of an atheist country, with on science and technology while getting rid of outdated superstitions that may hinder progress. One where the citizens concentrate on finding real solutions and improving oneself, rather than leave it all up to faith and the hands of fate. There is this phrase in Chinese: 世上没有从天而降的英雄，只有挺身而出的凡人。 which translates to: "There are no heroes falling from the sky in this world, only ordinary people who step forward." which means we shouldn't depend on the heavens to help us, the true heroes are those who step up to the challenge.
    1
  15361. @comment sense What exactly has some mysterious entity up above ever done for China or for Chinese people, that we should worship it so? There is this phrase in Chinese: 世上没有从天而降的英雄，只有挺身而出的凡人。 which translates to: "There are no heroes falling from the sky in this world, only ordinary people who step forward." which means we shouldn't depend on the heavens to help us, the true heroes are those who step up to the challenge.
    1
  15362. @comment sense So what do rich people like Jeff Bezzos contribute? And it's not the rich people who are actually talented or innovative, it's the R&D sector that's dominated by scientists and researchers that are responsible for the advancement of technology. Even you yourself admitted that the rich people look for talent, so aren't you contradicting yourself here?
    1
  15363. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou in this world, the strong grow and the weak shrink since resources are limited, do you agree?" Didn't we discuss this already before? We both agree that the Earth's resources are limited, so the priority should be to limit further consumption of resources, switch to more sustainable models, and to divide up the existing wealth into a better distribution system that ensures that every human gets what they need. But you can't even come up with a proper counterargument, you just fatalistically accept the outcome without resistance, because that's what kapitalism has taught you to do.
    1
  15364. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou china is world's factory because china has a large population and cheap labor." China not only has the world's most manpower, but we also have the most brainpower statistically speaking. Larger populations have more geniuses after all, and since China has 4x the population of the United States, there should be 4x more geniuses in China compared to the U.S if you go by statistics. Consider two bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the United States. If we take the top 2% which say, produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal. ... Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large Populations Have More Geniuses So what makes you seem to think Americans can compete with Chinese? Where do Americans get their products from if not from China?
    1
  15365. @comment sense Imagine the possibilities of a truly atheist country, one that devotes time, energy and resources into advancing technology and humanity's understanding of science, instead of outdated superstitious practices that hinder progress. Where people focus on self-improvement and taking action, rather than leaving it to faith and the hands of fate to decide for us. That encapsulates the feeling behind the Chinese saying that "There are no heroes falling from the sky in this world, only ordinary people who step forward." There is no guarantee that religious people will always do good. I mean, some of the most heinous crimes on this planet were committed by people who hijacked religious for their nefarious purposes.
    1
  15366. @comment sense So? That's the brilliant people themselves contributing to society, why is it you cannot make a case for what rich people contribute to society? It's like you cannot form a cohesive argument, so you just throw everything and hope that something sticks.
    1
  15367. @comment sense If there's really not enough food, then why is there is food wastage? Shouldn't we redesign the global resource distribution system so that there is no food wastage, and that the resources go to those who urgently need them?
    1
  15368. @comment sense Chinese universities produce the most STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) out of any other country in the world. Countries With The Most STEM Graduates 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates This implies that China is going to play a much larger role in the STEM fields, given the sheer number of graduates produced in these fields. So what makes you think China cannot compete with America?
    1
  15369. @comment sense About science, China literally publishes more research papers than any other in the world. Here's a list of countries by number of scientific publications in 2020. 1. China (744,402) 2. United States (624,554) 3. United Kingdom (198,500) 4. India (191,590) 5. Germany (174,524) 6. Italy (127,502) 7. Japan (127,408) 8. Canada (121,111) 9. Russia (119,195) 10. France (112,838) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by number of scientific and technical journal articles
    1
  15370. @comment sense China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. Source: Wikipedia: Fishing Industry in China China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: Wikipedia: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities
    1
  15371. @comment sense So I take it you cannot explain how exactly do rich people like Jeff Bezzos contribute to societ? Is that why you keep on bringing up Huawei (which is 100% employee owned)? China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 So what makes you seem to think China cannot compete with America?
    1
  15372. @comment sense "Quantity has a quality all its own." - Joseph Stalin.
    1
  15373. @comment sense Don't Western countries also need to import food/grains from other countries as well?
    1
  15374. @comment sense Don't Western countries also need to import food/grains from other countries as well?
    1
  15375. @comment sense If Taiwan was truly independent, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations? Is there some force preventing Taiwan from joining the UN like an independent country can?
    1
  15376. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15377. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  15378. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15379. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  15380. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  15381. +Paul Harrison Since the 1970s, China has been investing heavily in African countries like Nigeria, Angola, Kenya, etc, and building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, schools, hospitals, hotels, shopping centers, powerstations, telecommunication projects, etc. China has done much to develop Africa in decades compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries
    1
  15382. 要是战忽局的，用英语评论比较好对吗？
    1
  15383. Did Gal Gadot spoke Mandarin in Wonder Woman?
    1
  15384.  @peterjones5243  Tiananmen Square is where Mao Zedong proclaimed the People's Republic of China back in 1949, where the portrait of Mao is hung, so what's your point?
    1
  15385.  @Andrew-oj3pv  Modern China was built by the sweat, blood, tears and sacrifice of the Chinese people and the government to turn China from a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) a growing scientific and technological power, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under CCP leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success.
    1
  15386.  @elanor2123  "You're saying that the Weibo post she posted was fake? No, it was true word by word," I read Peng Shuai's post on Weibo (full translation available on Reddit) and where are the allegations of sexual assault? Could you post her exact words accusing the CPC official of sexual assault, since you claim it was true word by word? It turns out Peng Shuai actually consented to sex, this was what she wrote: Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well. (带着七年前对你的情感同意了。是的就是我们发生性关系了。感情这东西很复杂, 说不清,从那日后我再次打开了对你的爱,后来与你相处的日子里,单从你人相处你是一个很好很好 的人) So where are the allegations of sexual assault in Peng Shuai's post?
    1
  15387.  @worldofenigma1  Not only does China print the most Bibles in the world, but China is on track to have to have the world's largest population of Christians by 2025-2030 (according to Christian websites and sources). So clearly, a significant portion of the Bibles printed in China are going to people in China.
    1
  15388. Westerners always complain Chinese tourists are rude, noisy, about poor traffic in China, with cars running red lights and people jaywalking, spitting in public and other undesirable social behaviors. What this system hopes to achieve is to limit such people from traveling overseas and flying to other countries, at least until their behaviors improve and their social score becomes more acceptable.
    1
  15389. Eric Sarnoski That's a rare comment, as many Westerners often expressed negative opinions about Chinese tourists. Nevertheless, one benefit of China's social credit system is that Chinese people exhibiting such undesirable social behaviors are only limited to China, and not allowed to fly out of the country until their score (and behavior improves) Its not a automatic dead end if your score falls below what is acceptable and there are ways to improve one's social score.
    1
  15390. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15391. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  15392. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15393. Even the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15394. 觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15395. Countries all over the world recognize that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15396.  @invictustheshark8547  Why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland.
    1
  15397. Georgia's President (who was born in France) has annouced that she would not recognize the election results and has vowed not to step down. And she does so all in the name of "democracy."
    1
  15398. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15399.  @ActualJusticeWarrior  At 4:30 , why'd you think every country was better before communism? Before the 1917, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe and technologically backward compared Western Europe and USA, but after the 1917 Communist Revolution, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe both militarily and economically.
    1
  15400.  @davyboy9397  Why do you think China was better pre Communist Party? Before the Communist Revolution, China was dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past under the Republic Of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) where China was divided into various warring provinces controlled by individual warlords and even Japan invaded China during this weak period of Chinese history. It was Mao Zedong and the Communists who succeeded in herculean task of reunifying our divided country and founded the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949. So why do people still think China was better pre-Communist?
    1
  15401.  @roberthold5624  Before the 1917 Communist Revolution, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe at that time. Only about 15% of the population lived in towns, and fewer than 10% worked in industry. Agriculture, provided the livelihood for 80 percent of the population and was dominated by peasants, whose traditional household economies were extremely inefficient compared to agriculture in Western Europe or the United States. But after the 1917 Communist Revolution by the Bolsheviks, the new Soviet Union rapidly became arguably the strongest country in Europe at that time, both economically as well as militarily (that's why NATO was formed in response to Soviet Union's rise). The Soviet Union was even the world's 2nd largest economy from 1960-1985 during it's heyday. So why does the uploader seem to think that every country was better pre-Communist? That's the gist of what I'm asking him.
    1
  15402. The more Nato aids Ukraine, the more territory Ukraine loses.
    1
  15403. But if people somehow think that Cyrus is being influenced by the Communist Party of China (CPC) to spread his peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" then isn't that a positive message for the world? U.S-China relations have declined to their lowest point in decades, promoting the alternative message of war is an unthinkable thing to people wanting a peaceful world.
    1
  15404. The U.S continuing to send officials to the island is only going to inflam tensions on the Taiwan Strait. No one in the Asia-Pacific wants war, it's the U.S that wants to start one in the region in a bid to contain China's rise.
    1
  15405.  @QuentinKLEau  There isn't really a Chinese ban on Australian coal. According to CNBC article dated to Jun 30 2022, China has finished clearing a backlog of stranded Australian coal amounting to over $1 billion according to China customs data, and Chinese coal buyers just aren't choosing to buy any more. The reasons for not buying is that our coal inventories have been building up, local coal production has increased, and there are now higher supplies from exporters such as Russia purchased at a discount.
    1
  15406.  @QuentinKLEau  Russia is selling gas at a discount to countries friendly to it (such as India and China) so it's understandable for China to seize upon this deal.
    1
  15407. Most of the world is capitalistic is where the means of production are controlled by the bourgeois (aka private owners) and capitalists constantly seek to shrink worker wages and prolong working hours in order to skim off a wider profit margin for themselves. A small group of people (i.e the board of directors) makes all the major decisions on what to produce, how to produce and what to do with the profits (which they mostly take for themselves) and the workers of the company have no say. What you described sounds remarkably similar to communism, where the proletariat (i.e Workers) own the means of production. The workers are their own bosses, they get to decide what to produce and what to do with the fruits of their labour and how to divide up the profits among themselves.
    1
  15408. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15409. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15410. German Chancellor Merkel served 4th terms, while President Xi is only entering his 3rd.
    1
  15411. President Xi Jinping is entering his 3rd term, but German Chancellor Angela Merkel served her 4th term.
    1
  15412. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served her 4th term while President Xi Jinping is entering his 3rd term.
    1
  15413. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China...
    1
  15414. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China......
    1
  15415. German Chancellor Merkel served 4th terms, while President Xi is only entering his 3rd.
    1
  15416. +Michael Nelson Look at America having the largest prison incarceration rate in the world. America's prisons are so full and overcrowded, that the US government sometimes release inmates back on the streets to relieve the overcrowding problem. Most of these ex-convicts find it difficult to get a job with their criminal record, and many wind up back in prison instead. What sort of freedom is this?
    1
  15417.  @hangar17  Why are you accusing me of being CCP mouthpiece? My article is from Tech Times, so how exactly did Chinese state media twisted his words in the article, you tell me?
    1
  15418.  @canto_v12  Exactly. The 5 demands are just that; demands. Carrie Lam is open to dialogue with Hong Kong protestors, but if they don't want to negotiations, then what is the protestors endgame?
    1
  15419.  @canto_v12  The most important objective right now for Carrie Lam is to restore peace, how to talk in details about IPCC and electoral reforms? And didn't the Sino-British declaration said that there should be no changes to Hong Kong's electoral system for 50 years so how is Carrie Lam going to promise electoral reforms, when Hong Kong is literally "burning" under the rioters?
    1
  15420. Source: Wikipedia: List of Longest Bridges wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest_bridges Look at how many of the world's longest bridges China has.
    1
  15421. Venezuela's food crisis is because oil makes up more than half of Venezuela's GDP, and the USA slapped oil sanctions on Venezuela, effectively 'halving' its GDP and crippling its economy, causing food prices to skyrocket.
    1
  15422.  @freetibet8140  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a Map of all the territory Taiwan claims (Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File: ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  15423. +韩宇 Agreed with what you said. In traditional Chinese culture, usually the family wealth go to the eldest son (even if there are daughters older than him). Perhaps Chinese families will begin sharing the wealth between the two children, or the elder daughter would have accumulated enough wealth on her own to support herself, if the family inheritance goes to the son.
    1
  15424. Jaber Martini Chinese people is not a race, and there are over 50 ethnic minority groups living in China, apart from the Han Chinese, and they include Tibetans, Uyghurs, Mongolians, Manchurians and even some Koreans.
    1
  15425.  @jonathanortega2805 Look at religions causing Holy Wars, Crusades and Jihad! Why can't China ban them in our country? China is teaching Muslims (and Christians) to put the country 1st and their religion 2nd .
    1
  15426.  @eyetube33  "@神州 Shenzhou that is up to the citizens to decide not the government" What makes you think the citizens themselves know how to decide? Citizens don't always make the best political decisions, because they are fickle, they make decisions based on emotions, or they simply lack political awareness. Look at Brexit Referendum in Britain for example, and you think you should let citizens decide, not the goverment?
    1
  15427. For those people who say China's One-Child Policy resulted in more boys than girls: Look at India, the world's 2nd most populous country. India did not have birth control policies and yet, India ALSO has more boys than girls! (India's gender imbalance ratio of 1.12 which is close to China's 1.15.) So why you think China would have more equal numbers of boys and girls WITHOUT One-Child Policy? Even a populous country like India still have gender imbalance ratio, even without One-Child Policy.
    1
  15428.  @aghileshemdani3144  "..when Muslim Marry with westerns their children will bé more assimilated than his father or mother Muslim." Under Islamic laws, if a non-Muslim wants to marry a Muslim, he/she has to covert to Islam if the couple is to be married.
    1
  15429.  @aghileshemdani3144  China has a shortage of women, and single men in China are willing to fork out money to purchase brides to marry. I am against the non-consensual kidnapping of women, but if it is consensual and done through legal means, then I don't see the problem with Chinese men buying brides. It helps solves China's falling birth rates as well as helping the bride family receive the money they need.
    1
  15430. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15431. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  15432. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15433. Even Taiwan's own constitution acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15434. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15435. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  15436.  @garethhahahah2037  "But some countries are already moving to refine this stuff." Yeah, but can they refine rare earth metals as cheaply and efficiently as China? If not, then the Made-in-Elsewhere products would be more costly to produce, than Made-in-China products. Given the nature of capitalism, they won't let this happen and therefore, decoupling from China is virtually impossible.
    1
  15437.  @TacticalMayo  It's not going to happen. Other countries cannot compete in China's level of rare earth metals production. Their refining process is less efficient than China's and the cost of Made-in-Elsewhere products will be higher than Made-in-China products.
    1
  15438.  @garethhahahah2037  "But they will care more about environment and want their people to having a living wage." India is home to many of the world's most polluted cities, like Bhiwadi and Delhi what makes you think "they will care more about environment"? And are Indians willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers? If not, then the costs of Made-in-India goods will be higher than Made-in-China's. "Richer countries can do like China have done with things like steal and subitise it" China did not steal the production method for rare earth metals. Foreign companies agreed to transfer technology (or to pair up with a local Chinese companies) as part of the terms for setting up business in China. "It just take time and prices for something might go up for a little times as production is scaled up in other countries." But it's virtually impossible for other countries to scale up production to the same levels as China. China and India have the world's largest workforces after all, and India can't replace China for the reasons I stated above.
    1
  15439.  @garethhahahah2037  _"Then you have the genocides happening in China and companies don't want to be seen linked to that like Nike and H&M, " The population of ethnic minorities in China have actually grown over the years, what genocide are you referring to?
    1
  15440.  @garethhahahah2037  "Fear and uncertainty over things and laws the China government is doing and so on are all putting some people off investing." According to Reuters, China was the largest recipient of foreign direct investment (FDI) in 2020, receiving $163 billion in inflows compared to the $134 billion attracted by the United States according to a report by United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
    1
  15441.  @garethhahahah2037  The population of Uyghurs have grown over the years, what genocide are you talking about? Which minority is being targeted for organ harvesting? Have you actually been to Inner Mongolia and seen what life is like there? Inner Mongolia still uses the Mongolian script, while Outer Mongolian (aka Mongolia itself) uses the Cyrillic alphabet.
    1
  15442.  @garethhahahah2037  China is switching to automation to make up for a declining workforce, so who knows, perhaps by 2100, China's automation would allow us to manufacture competitively. Already, China is the world's biggest market for automation, can you imagine how China would be in 2100? Last year, for the whole year of 2022, foreign direct investment flows to China reached around 189.1 billion U.S. dollars, an increase of around 12 percent compared to the previous year. So if anything, it looks as though foreign investment in China is continuing to increase
    1
  15443.  @garethhahahah2037  You said: "China is the only country in the world that you can book a date that you want a Organ transplant and if your body rejects it they do it again." No, there are other countries that permit re-transplantation of organs if your body rejects it. According to American Kidney Fund, if your new kidney fails, you canalso get evaluated for another kidney transplant. If you are healthy enough, you can have more than one kidney transplant. ... Source: American Kidney Fund
    1
  15444.  @garethhahahah2037  "China is the only country in the world that you can book a date that you want a Organ transplant and if your body rejects it they do it again." No, there are other countries that permit re-transplantation of organs if your body rejects it. According to American Kidney Fund, if your new kidney fails, you can also get evaluated for another kidney transplant. If you are healthy enough, you can have more than one kidney transplant.
    1
  15445.  @garethhahahah2037  What are the figures for the Uighur population in the past couple of years? Also, instead of looking up "camps" on Google Maps, people have actively visited the ground coordinates of those satellite images and found those places to be schools, old-folks homes, warehouses and so on.
    1
  15446.  @garethhahahah2037  Locations that had been marked as "concentration camps" by some Western media and an Australian institute were found to be administration buildings, nursing homes, logistics centers or schools. "The 'detention center' of Turpan city mentioned in the report is actually a local administrative building; the 'detention center' of Kashi is, in fact, local high school buildings.
    1
  15447.  @pokapig3425  It does consist of some talent, not just dedication alone. There are people who are talented and can pick up multiple languages easily. Then there are others who spend a long time mastering a single language, yet still can't achieve it. It's really a case of Talent versus Dedication.
    1
  15448. It's simple, President Trump will eventually have to step down, when his presidential term is over. The next US president might just start reversing Trump's tariffs and lift the US-China trade war. President Xi abolished the term limit, so you can bet he will still be guiding China when Trump's tariffs are gone. How can US presidents with their 4-8 years term limit, make any long-term plans and strategies against China spanning 10 years or more?
    1
  15449.  @srouji6  What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, everyone has heard of Chinese tourists spending money in your countries. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese students, studying the same topics as their peers. So why you think Chinese people aren't free then? We can be found virtually all over the globe (since we make up 20% of the world's population after all)
    1
  15450. Google Translate is quirky when it comes to translating Chinese into English. In her original post she wrote 带我去你家逼我和你发生关系? which means "take me to your house and forcefully start a relationship with you" but Google Translate is is translated to "forced to have sex with you" and that's where all the misunderstanding comes about.
    1
  15451.  @dagsmoko3889  According to World Intellectual Property Indicators, China applies for more patents than any other country in the world and we also have the world's largest number of granted patents. Patent applications for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (1,542,002 patents) 2. United States (597,141 patents) 3. Japan (313,567 patents) 4. South Korea (209,992 patents) 5. European Patent Office (174,397 patents) 6. Germany (67,898 patents) ... Source: World Intellectual Property Indicators wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Indicators#Patents Patent grants for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (432,147 patents) 2. United States (307,759 patents) 3. Japan (194,525 patents) 4. European Patent Office (127,603 patents) 5. South Korea (119,012 patents) 6. Russian Federation (35,774 patents) ...
    1
  15452.  @dagsmoko3889  About Education in China, China has been a top destination for international students and as of 2013, China was the most popular country in Asia for international students and ranked third overall among countries. Source: China ranks 3rd among countries that host the most international students, according to Institute of International Educational usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/2013/10/08/explore-the-worlds-top-universities As of 2018, the country had the world's second-highest number of top universities, after the United States. China surpassed the U.S. with the number of universities including in the 2020 CWTS Leiden Ranking edition (204 vs.198). Source: China has world's second-largest number of top universities china.org.cn/china/2018-08/16/content_58887220.htm
    1
  15453.  @dagsmoko3889  "神州 Shenzhou Are they allowed to leave?" Unless international students commit crimes while in China, then they are free to leave. China is now the leading destination globally for Anglophone African students Source: China tops US and UK as destination for anglophone African students theconversation.com/china-tops-us-and-uk-as-destination-for-anglophone-african-students-78967 According to the most recent statistics by the Ministry of Education, the total number of international students in Chinese higher education was 492,185 (including 258,122 degree students) in 2018. China has overtaken the UK (hosting 458,520 international students in 2018 according to Study in UK) to become the host of second largest international student population. Source: theconversation.com/china-tops-us-and-uk-as-destination-for-anglophone-african-students-78967
    1
  15454. They stir up domestic issues in order to keep their local population divided, while also uniting them in their foreign policy against China.
    1
  15455.  @zackk4969  "The three evil regimes that killed most of their people..." Westerners have killing other people, causing genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, occupying their lands even till today, importing African slaves to labor for them. The demographics of entire continents have been irreversibly changed because of Western colonialism, yet you want to complain about China and Russia?
    1
  15456.  @zackk4969  "The Chiinese search engine, Baidu, is a liar! If you search Chloe Zhao & Oscar, It says Sorry, cannot find any results. Shame on you, Chiina!" I searched Chloe Zhao on Baidu, and she even has her own Baidu page, what are you talking about?
    1
  15457.  @zackk4969  I did exactly that, and Baidu returned around 400k results, so what are you talking about?
    1
  15458.  @zackk4969  Now you're moving the goalpost. First you said: Sorry, cannot find any results, now you're admitting that there are 400k results on Baidu? Why are you moving the goalpost after you've been proven wrong?
    1
  15459.  @zackk4969  The People's Liberation Army hasn't had any actual combat experience since China's last conflict in 1979, so isn't China currently at peace? Look at the number of wars the U.S started. The United States has been at war for about 225 of the 243 years since its inception in 1776.
    1
  15460.  @zackk4969  The Diaoyu Islands belonged to China originally, until Japan invaded them and occupied them during the war. At the end of WWII, Japan signed the surrender to relinquish their claims to all their previously occupied territory, then why wasn't Diaoyu Islands returned back to China?
    1
  15461.  @zackk4969  You literally admitted that you had 400k results when you claimed "神州 Shenzhou Well none of the 400k result said" then are you digging a hole by claiming that there is no results?
    1
  15462.  @zackk4969  I entered the search term in Baidu, and I found 1.3 million results, so what are you talking about?
    1
  15463.  @zackk4969  What genocide of Xinjiang Uighur people? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  15464.  @zackk4969  There are literally Chinese articles indicating who won the academy awards of best picture and best director this year, what are you talking about? And what's your point anyway about bringing up this director?
    1
  15465.  @zackk4969  How is Zhao Ting a sensitive word when I can clearly say it? And why are Cyrus and China to blame? If anything, shouldn't it be YouTube policy that's to blame if you claim it's a sensitive word?
    1
  15466.  @zackk4969  Again, what genocide of Xinjiang Uighur people? The population of Uighurs in China from actually tripled in size from 3 million (1953) to 10 million (2010). Even in 2018, the population of Uighurs in China grew to 12.7 million so what genocide are you talking about?
    1
  15467. Macron wanted NATO boots on the ground in Ukraine too. He's seeking WWIII
    1
  15468.  @calinyx  Funny how you boasted about YouTube's "freedom" to discuss any topic, yet all your comments regarding organ harvesting from prisoners have been shadowbanned and aren't visible to the public. And to answer your question, it has become easier for organ transplantation in China because the awareness of organ donation in China has grown over the years and being supported by the public, as more people are signing up to be organ donors after their death. Additionally, advances in computer technology in China have also helped identify and match organ donors with their respective recipients faster, resulting in shorter waiting times for patients.
    1
  15469.  @blimpusa  "神州 Shenzhou We love the Chinese diaspora here in Australia." Asian-Australians have reported almost 400 racist attacks since the beginning of Covid-19 to the country's leading survey of anti-China racism. The survey has documented 386 racist incidents, including abuse, physical intimidation and spitting. The survey also revealed that roughly 90% of racist incidents were not being reported to police and the vast majority were perpetrated by strangers in public places. Source: Sydney Morning Herald: Almost 400 anti-China attacks since pandemic began smh.com.au/politics/federal/almost-400-anti-china-attacks-since-pandemic-began-20200607-p550a8.html
    1
  15470.  @rosszografov614  "神州 Shenzhou Don't believe that Oz media propaganda: That anti China sentiment is growing in Australia." Asian-Australians have reported almost 400 racist attacks since the beginning of Covid-19 to the country's leading survey of anti-China racism. The survey has documented 386 racist incidents, including abuse, physical intimidation and spitting. The survey also revealed that roughly 90% of racist incidents were not being reported to police and the vast majority were perpetrated by strangers in public places. Source: Sydney Morning Herald: Almost 400 anti-China attacks since pandemic began smh.com.au/politics/federal/almost-400-anti-china-attacks-since-pandemic-began-20200607-p550a8.html
    1
  15471.  @jy3ster  I have been to Perth before and yes, there is anti-China sentiment in Australia, even before Covid-19.
    1
  15472.  @Jj-gi2uv  Agreed, China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  15473.  @rosszografov614  My SMH article quotes an independent progressive thinktank Per Capita, in collaboration with the Asian Australian Alliance and Being Asian Australian. "There definitely has been an increase," Osmond Chiu said, noting that compared to similar data from the United States, there have been a higher proportion of racist incidents against Asian-Australians than Asian-Americans. Also, the survey specifically states that 90% of racist incidents were not being reported to police and the vast majority were perpetrated by strangers in public places. So while you may not see any racist activity in your neighbourhood, that doesn't mean they aren't happening, as they aren't being reported.
    1
  15474.  @rosszografov614  I'm talking about actual racist attacks against Asian Australians and that 386 racist incidents (including abuse, physical intimidation and spitting) have committed against Asian Australians. What's this even got to do with turning Chinese against the Communist Party of China? This is actual Australian racist behaviour against Asian Australians, how's this a plot to against the CPC? And I gave a survey to support my arguments, whereas you just claim you have 25 years of experience as your argument? And the survey noted that roughly 90% of racist incidents were not being reported to police and the vast majority were perpetrated by strangers in public places. So just because you don't see them on your street, doesn't mean that it's not happening elsewhere.
    1
  15475.  @rosszografov614  You asked: "How can there be an increase, when most Chinese citizens and students left, a long time ago?" Because the almost 400 attacks were done on Asian Australians, not Chinese citizens or students, so why is it inconceivable that there's an increase in racist attacks against Asian Australians? And you said that you worked for 25 years in the research industry? Yeah right, your lack of experience is certainly showing. The fact remains that I quoted a source to support my arguments, whereas all you given me is your own anecdotal evidence that's all. 90% of racist incidents were not being reported to police and the vast majority were perpetrated by strangers in public places, so just because you don't see it happening, doesn't necessarily mean it doesn't exist.
    1
  15476.  @blimpusa  Which agreement did China did not agree with? Using the Sino-British declaration for example, Hong Kong today has their own government separate from the mainland. Hong Kong has their own separate judiciary system. Hong Kong has their own separate passport (Hong Kong passport) and their own currency (Hong Kong dollars) so how exactly did China violate the Sino-British declaration?
    1
  15477.  @intothewrx  You posted such a long comment here, yet you can't be bother to read other people's long comment?
    1
  15478.  @blimpusa  According to WTO website on dispute settlement, the USA, EU and China have the following number of dispute cases as complainant and respondent: United States: 131 cases as complainant, 165 cases as respondent. European Union: 102 cases as complainant, 94 cases as respondent. China: 22 cases as complainant, 43 cases as respondent. Source: Map of disputes between WTO Members wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_maps_e.htm Therefore, USA has had more than 100 cases as complaint and respondent, the EU has about 100 of each, whereas China doesn't even have 50 of either.
    1
  15479.  @wrongchannel2780  From my conversations with him, mark yeung is a Chinese living in Canada with strong ties to Hong Kong.
    1
  15480. It's the Yellow Peril mindset (the fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so thoroughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the thought of a non-Western country like China eventually surpassing the USA someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    1
  15481.  @呆丸螂死全家  China wasn't originally named China before, there were many names to describe Chine previously.
    1
  15482.  @Andy-P  You said: "神州 Shenzhou The Chinese & Indian ones certainly did." The Chinese and Indian ones weren't really aberrations per se, because China and India were historically economic powers from 1-1800 AD. It's the rise of the West that's a historical aberration, and the rise of China and India are merely our countries returning to our previous superpower status.
    1
  15483.  @Andy-P "神州 Shenzhou No need to import western goods then?" It's not China that wants to decouple from the West, it's the West that wants it. But decoupling at this point in time is virtually impossible to achieve, given that China controls 90% of the world's rare earth metals production. Rare earths are used as components in high technology devices, including smart phones, digital cameras, computer hard disks, fluorescent and light-emitting-diode (LED) lights, flat screen televisions, computer monitors, and electronic displays.
    1
  15484.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou No need to import western goods then?" It's not China that wants to decouple from the West, it's the West that wants it. But decoupling at this point in time is virtually impossible to achieve,
    1
  15485.  @AQuietNight  "神州 Shenzhou As I said: Income distribution" Yes, the U.S has huge income inequality and nothing seems to be done to address this issue. On the other hand, President Xi has vowed to reduce the income gap through common prosperity.
    1
  15486.  @AQuietNight  "神州 Shenzhou China has more to lose if it loses it's export market than the U.S. has to gain by importing from China." China is the world's factory, there's always a demand for Chinese goods by the rest of the world. Even if you exclude the US, Chinese goods are in demand in emerging economies in South America, Africa, Middle-East and South East Asia. Whereas where is the U.S going to get their products from if they decouple from China? No other country in the world can match China as the world's factory.
    1
  15487.  @Andy-P  Unclogging and reopening closed rare earth mines in the West is a slow process, not to mention the extraction process might only produce small yields of rare earths, compared to China's rare earth production. Also, will Western people tolerate the pollution that's a byproduct of rare earth production?
    1
  15488.  @Andy-P  You said: "China has already used the rare earths option on Japan in the past." Are you certain that China has exercised the rare earth option on Japan? Analysis of Japanese port data from the Japanese Ministry of Finance shows that there was no uniform drop in Japanese imports of Chinese rare earths. Similarly, a 2012 article in The Chinese Journal of International Politics cites Japanese and US news media to demonstrate that Japanese officials and businesses had been aware since mid-August 2010 of Chinese plans to reduce their worldwide rare earths exports. The studies suggest that any decline in rare earth exports to Japan in the latter half of 2010 was more likely the result of China’s earlier decision to cut worldwide rare earths exports.
    1
  15489.  @AQuietNight  Are American workers willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers? If not, then the cost of Made-in-US goods will be higher than Made-in-China goods. Combined with inflation and the rising cost of fuel and food in the U.S, those Made-in-US goods are going to have a harder time finding buyers than Made-in-China goods. And if American products can last 60-80 years, then how are the American companies going to make money? The fact remains that there's always a demand for Chinese goods, so even if U.S somehow decouples from China, China can still export our products to developing economies like in South America, Africa, Middle East, ASEAN countries, etc. But if the U.S stops importing from China, then they would lack access to affordable goods, making the cost of living in the U.S much higher.
    1
  15490.  @AQuietNight  Even though U.S Federal Reserve spends a lot on Social Security, it doesn't yield the desired results, as the bottom 50% of lower income Americans have had their standards of living remained unchanged for the past 40 years (source: Prof Kishore Mabubani). Since it's apparently ineffective in the US, what makes you think President Xi will follow the West and start implementing social security programs in China?
    1
  15491.  @AQuietNight  Excuse me, but didn't you say earlier that: "The Yuan will have to rise in value"? That means the RMB that people saved after retirement will be worth more, so aren't you contradicting yourself here?
    1
  15492. The Lone Wolf China's initial tariffs on soybeans and other US imports remain unchanged isn't it?
    1
  15493.  @borisnegrarosa9113  "Shenzhou. Show us proof of that "armada " That's right, you can't." We have proof from documentation of Zheng He's naval voyages. Mementos of Zheng He's voyages can be found in the places he visited. Also seven large sunken ships were found in the sea near Dongsha Island, which were confirmed to belong to Zheng He's fleet. Yet despite having such a huge naval fleet at that time, China did not seek to conquer overseas territory nor to found overseas colonies. Because there are 0 overseas Chinese colonies.
    1
  15494. I didn't laugh one bit at the sidekick's jokes. That's just not enough chemistry between Trevor and him, they don't bounce off each other well enough.
    1
  15495.  @niyarao2962  So India can claim Goa, Sikkim, Jammu & Kashmir, Tripura, Manipur, etc then why can't China claim Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong and so on? India use historical basis for their claims then can't China use historical basis as well?
    1
  15496.  @giteshmalhotra7645  It was the Tibetans who signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) for short on 1952, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet, so it was Tibetans that signed that document.
    1
  15497.  @giteshmalhotra7645  How much do you know about Chinese history? Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  15498.  @stephencalvert8298  Why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa? During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage; they were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were lousy, and they had far fewer numbers (only 50 communist members in 1921) over the Kuomintang. The KMT on the other hand, had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training, and far superior numbers over the the communists. Securing victory against the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT. Yet the communists survived all KMT attempts to wipe them out, employing strategies like "Long March" (长征) and despite KMT's initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan). This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland.
    1
  15499. During Covid, Vancouver experienced a whopping 717% increase in anti-Asian hate crimes, earning it the title as the anti-Asian hate crime capital of North America
    1
  15500. At the finals, President Trump will have to step down after 4-8 years when his term is over. The next US President might just start reversing Trump's policies and lift the US-China trade war. No more tariffs President Xi Jinping abolish the term limits, so he can remain long after Trump's tariffs are over.
    1
  15501.  suburben yobbo  The Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again, which government body is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, India, Europe and USA. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm And about India, India has the world's highest infant mortality rate. Source: economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/india-had-worlds-highest-child-mortality-rate-in-2015-lancet-study/articleshow/69338346.cms
    1
  15502.  suburben yobbo  As the country with world's largest population, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, so there should be 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Taken from the above: Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  15503.  suburben yobbo  China is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending and catching up fast to the United States. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($451.9 billion) <-- 3. European Union ($379.0 billion) 4. Japan ($165.7 billion) 5. Germany ($118.8 billion) 6. South Korea ($91.6 billion) In the West, researchers offend have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    1
  15504. @ForrestSCS What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  15505. @mav Before 2019, according to China outbound tourism statistics, Chinese tourists made over 100 million overseas trips and 99.99% of them returned back to China. Chinese tourists actually constitute the largest outbound tourists of any country in the world.
    1
  15506.  @TacticalMayo  Sounds like you're the one trying to cope till you throw up. It's no secret that the US is in decline and China is rising.
    1
  15507.  Pain Zer0  Actually, the so-called "debt trap" by China is merely a myth according to an article published in The Atlantic by authors Deborah Brautigam and Meg Rithmire. Their research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country. Source: The Atlantic: The Chinese ‘Debt Trap’ Is a Myth (By Deborah Brautigam and Meg Rithmire)
    1
  15508.  Pain Zer0  Actually, the so-called "debt trap" by China is merely a myth according to an article published in The Atlantic by authors Deborah Brautigam and Meg Rithmire. Their research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country.
    1
  15509.  Pain Zer0  According to an article published in The Atlantic by authors Deborah Brautigam and Meg Rithmire, their research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country. ... Source: The Atlantic: The Chinese ‘Debt Trap’ Is a Myth (By Deborah Brautigam and Meg Rithmire)
    1
  15510.  @laksiwmthdb9947  You said: "The whole world did it too, but you seem very sure of the whole history but are you really? Shall we point out the atrocities done from your side? Those even being practice to this very day?" Could you point out which part of the whole history is not true? I've never said that the whole world didn't do such things, but can't I point out what the U.S did?
    1
  15511.  @user-fb2me3th6z  China was previously conquered by foreign factions like Mongols and Manchurians throughout our history yes, but eventually these foreign rulers gave up their own culture and adopted Han Chinese culture and assimilated into China. For example, Kublai Khan (descendant of Genghis Khan) choose to give up his nomadic Mongol ways and proclaim himself Emperor of Yuan Dynasty China and slept under a permanent roof in the Chinese Imperial Palace. Whereas his nomadic ancestor, Genghis Khan purportedly never slept under a permanent roof his entire life.
    1
  15512.  @ttomtkh  "神州 Shenzhou iro brother my ass, it all bulls**t" Pakistan has been helping China ever since our founding and they are an ally unlike any other. Over the course of decades both our countries have built the bond until we are iron brothers (铁巴) and it's the West that's trying to drive a wedge between our brotherhood.
    1
  15513.  @kingofmean5890  China has built at least 35,000 mosques, more than France's 2,300, America's 2,106, and Great Britain's 1,600. Even on the per capital basis, Chinese Muslims still have more than triple the amount of mosques their Western peers have. Yet you're claiming those Turkish Muslims in Eastern part of China had their religious views stopped?
    1
  15514.  @kingofmean5890  Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway ... Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  15515.  @ttomtkh  Pakistan has been helping China ever since our founding and they are an ally unlike any other. Over the course of decades both our countries have built the bond until we are iron brothers (铁巴) and it's the West that's trying to drive a wedge between our brotherhood.
    1
  15516.  @ttomtkh  Go talk to Pakistani people on how Chinese view them. Chinese literally call Pakistani our iron brothers, it's the West that's trying to drive a wedge between our countries.
    1
  15517.  @johnlay3040  "神州 Shenzhou Don't overlook the fact that these people you are arguing with are the victims of western propagandas and fake news." That's true, but there are Westerners who initially thought the worst of China, but had the courage to visit our country and were surprised to discover that China wasn't what the Western MSM painted it out to be, and became angry and disappointed at how Western MSM pulled the wool over their eyes in the West. Only by engaging with such people, could we stand a chance to make them reconsider their views.
    1
  15518.  @johnlay3040  "神州 Shenzhou Don't overlook the fact that these people you are arguing with are the victims of western propagandas." That's true, but there are Westerners who initially thought the worst of China, but had the courage to visit our country and were surprised to discover that China wasn't what the Western MSM painted it out to be, and became angry and disappointed at how Western MSM deceived them. Only by engaging with such people, could we stand a chance to make them reconsider their views.
    1
  15519.  @johnlay3040  That's true, but there are Westerners who initially thought the worst of China, but had the courage to visit our country and were surprised to discover that China wasn't what the Western MSM painted it out to be, and became angry and disappointed at how Western MSM deceived them. Only by engaging with such people, could we stand a chance to make them reconsider their views.
    1
  15520. One reason for the U.S-China trade deficit is the difference in spending culture between China. In Chinese culture, people are encouraged to be frugal and to save up money for a rainy day, whereas American culture is about consumerism, over consumption and buying things that they don't really need. This results in a trade deficit.
    1
  15521. Canada is fast becoming the common enemy of BRICS, by detaining Huawei CFO, sanctioning Russia, and now expelling Indian diplomats.
    1
  15522.  @LULU-zi1ih  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China under the One China policy.
    1
  15523. @michael douglas Nothing wrong with state-owned companies. In China, the government controls the companies for China's benefit. Whereas in America, its actually the reverse, and US corporations control the US government for, profit, war, oil, by increasing US military spending. Don't Americans often complain that the Zionists are controlling their government for example?
    1
  15524.  Dalin Zhong  About "hiding the truth," remember that Western MSM is always watching China for any "signs of weakness" (any whatsoever) to exploit and frame China negatively. The Western MSM aren't interested in the truth, they will twist any event to inflict the maximum PR damage to China. Like it or not, some level of censorship is still necessary in China to maintain control.
    1
  15525.  Dalin Zhong  That's why the Hukou system, although antiquated, is still necessary at times, to stop rural people from migrating to Beijing or Shanghai and flooding those cities. In America, it happens all the time, where a fresh graduate from countryside travel to New York and can't find a job, can't find an apartment or afford rent, end up homeless on the streets. Other countries have these problems, but China should solve our problems our own way, not just blindly copy the West.
    1
  15526.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou So far the elections in Hong Kong results in incompetent Chief Executives (even you have to agree on it)." This implies that maybe (just maybe) democracy is not for Hong Kong after all. Perhaps democracy just doesn't suit Hong Kong at all, because previously, Hong Kong actually flourished under authoritarian British colonial rule for 150 years as a British colony, and now Hong Kong is suffering under democracy. Because Hong Kong had no previous history of democracy, the people have no idea who, how and what to vote for in politics, the Hong Kong governors had no previous experience of governing, and they don't know how to plan for Hong Kong's future. Look at prosperous Shenzhen in the mainland, just across from Hong Kong and Shenzhen’s economic growth surpassed Hong Kong's in 2017. Source: Shenzhen surpasses US$338 billion GDP mark in 2017, beats Hong Kong and Singapore’s growth scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2128310/shenzhen-88-cent-hi-tech-growth-roll-hit-y2tr-2017 Shenzhen is roughly the same economic size as Singapore and Hong Kong, but recorded nominal output of 2.2 trillion yuan (US$338 billion) in 2017 thanks to its booming hi-tech sector. Over 40% of the output came from “innovative” businesses such as internet, biotech and telecom. And that's despite Shenzhen being under communist party rule, while Hong Kong is suffering under its own democratic government.
    1
  15527.  @MarkYeung1  Imagine that in 1997, if Hong Kong had been fully returned to China, under communist party rule, then perhaps (just perhaps) Hong Kong would be as prosperous as Shenzhen is today in the mainland under communist party rule.
    1
  15528.  @catmandu6776  Of all those 40 cities that could host a summer Olympics, how many of them can (and have) hosted both the Summer Olympics and Winter Olympics like Beijing has in 2008 and 2022 respectively? And earlier you complain about China using Beijing twice (i.e you said: "神州 Shenzhou wonder why a country the size of China would use the same city to host the Olympics for a second time?") yet you have a big country like USA has used Los Angeles twice for the Olympics?
    1
  15529.  @catmandu6776  You said: "I don't care that Beijing hosted the Olympics again but boasting about it as some great thing, is nonsense." I merely stated that Beijing is officially the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both the Summer Olympics (2008) and the Winter Olympics (2022), how is that nonsense? You said: "Every city that I listed for a winter Olympics in the US could also host a summer Olympics. They absolutely have the infrastructure to do so." Well, why didn't they do so? Instead, it's Beijing that broken Olympic history as the first city to host both the Summer and Winter Olympics. You said: "And again, when a city in the United States host an Olympics, they do so on their own without federal funding." Well, that's a shame for the U.S then. In my opinion, hosting an Olympics should be the honor of the entire country, not just a single state/province that bears the burden of hosting the event.
    1
  15530.  @catmandu6776  Why did you cut off the tail end of my statement, instead of quoting the whole sentence? The full sentence is: "In my opinion, hosting an Olympics should be the honor of the entire country, not just a single state/province that bears the burden of hosting the event." Since it's the country that hosts the Olympics, shouldn't the country bear the financial burdens, not just the single state/province, as in the United States? Also, why is it you seem to think Beijing being the first city in Olympic history to host both the Summer and Winter Olympics is "nonsense"? Even though you boasted America could easily have done that, they haven't done so.
    1
  15531.  @catmandu6776  "神州 Shenzhou incorrect. It is not the country that hosts the Olympics... It's the city that hosts the Olympics not the country." Didn't you made it all about the country when you said: "@神州 Shenzhou wonder why a country the size of China would use the same city to host the Olympics for a second time?" In fact, my first post on this comment thread was about Beijing being officially the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both the Summer and Winter Olympics, it's you who suddenly made it about the country, instead of the city. You said: "The United States doesn't need to use the same city in back to back Olympics especially only 14 years apart. Why would you when you have so many other options? " But since you believe that it's not about the country hosting the Olympics, then why do you care when a city hosts the Olympics twice? Both of us agreed that Los Angeles hosted the Olympics twice, then can't Beijing be the first to host both the Summer and Winter Olympics without being regarded as "nonsense" by you? And what's the time frame of 14 years even got to do with the argument? Countries all over the world bid for the Olympics, if USA took 44 years for Los Angeles to host the Olympics, it means that other countries won the bid during that period that's all. You said: "I said the United States has many cities capable of hosting both the winter and summer Olympics but I didn't say they should." And I'm saying Beijing is the first city to actually host both the Winter and Summer Olympics, where even US cities haven't done so, despite having the infrastructure (according to you). Since USA decided not to, then Beijing takes the award of being the first to do so. Yet you look down on it and claim it's "nonsense"?
    1
  15532.  @catmandu6776  Why is bringing up the fact that Beijing is officially the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both the Summer and Winter Olympics not something to celebrate over? No other city in the world has achieved this, even though you claim USA is capable of it, USA hasn't done so, then can't I point out this fact? It's as though you can't stand to see China succeed that's all. You said: "It is absolutely about the city hosting and not the country." Then why'd you made it about the country when you said: "@神州 Shenzhou wonder why a country the size of China would use the same city to host the Olympics for a second time?" I mean, I did not even mention countries in my first post here, you're the one who started bringing countries into the equation. You said: "The United States just happens to be one of the very few countries that do not use federal funds to bid or host an Olympic games." By bringing up the country of the United States, you're literally contradicting your earlier claim that it's about the city hosting and not the country. You asked: "I'll ask you again... is Beijing the only city in China worth showing the world?" Since you stated that it's about the city hosting and not the country, then can't Beijing host both the summer and winter Olympics? You keep saying its all about the city, then why'd you keep on mentioning the country?
    1
  15533.  @catmandu6776  Looking back on this thread, this is my 1st comment on this thread: "Agreed. And now Beijing is officially the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both the Summer Olympics (2008) and the Winter Olympics (2022)." This is your 1st comment on this thread and your response to mine: "@神州 Shenzhou wonder why a country the size of China would use the same city to host the Olympics for a second time?" So clearly, you made it about the country, not the city, when my original post was about Beijing, not China. Yet now you are lecturing me that "神州 Shenzhou incorrect. It is not the country that hosts the Olympics... It's the city that hosts the Olympics not the country."? When you're the one literally making it about China and not Beijing? ... Additionally, you can boast about Los Angeles and Lake Placid hosting the Olympics twice, then can't I celebrate Beijing breaking Olympic history by being the first city to host both the Summer and Winter Olympics, where U.S cities haven't (even though you claim they have the infrastructure)?
    1
  15534.  @catmandu6776  But you explicitly said that's incorrect, it's not the country that hosts the Olympics, it's the city that hosts the Olympics not the country. Even my 1st comment on this thread did not mention any country, you're the one making it about the country in your 1st comment, so aren't you just a walking bag of contradictions? And neither did I boast about Beijing hosting multiple Olympics, I merely pointed out that Beijing is officially the first city in Olympic history to host both the Summer and Winter Olympics, that's all. Yet you claim this is "nonsense" when it's something that even the United States cities haven't achieved (despite having the infrastructure according to you)?
    1
  15535.  @catmandu6776  "神州 Shenzhou it's not the country that hosts." Then why'd you made it about the country when you replied: "@神州 Shenzhou wonder why a country the size of China would use the same city to host the Olympics for a second time?" I never made it about the country until you did, my 1st comment here was "Agreed. And now Beijing is officially the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both the Summer Olympics (2008) and the Winter Olympics (2022)." so I never said anything about the country, you're the one that's basically contradicting yourself here. You said: "The Olympic committee and process honors the city and that's why every Olympics bears the name of the host country." So you're saying that the International Olympic Committee selects the city itself? Then is there a problem that Beijing was selected twice for the Summer Olympics and the Winter Olympics? And since you have no problems talking about LA and Lake Placid hosting the Olympics twice, then what's the problem with Beijing being the first city in Olympic history to host both the Summer and Winter Olympics? No other cities have done so, despite the you claiming U.S cities have the infrastructure to do so, it was Beijing that did it. Yet why did you label it nonsense?
    1
  15536.  @catmandu6776  But I wasn't talking about the country, only the city. I even specifically said in my 1st comment here that "Agreed. And now Beijing is officially the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both the Summer Olympics (2008) and the Winter Olympics (2022).". In fact, you're the one who made it about the country when you said: "神州 Shenzhou wonder why a country the size of China would use the same city to host the Olympics for a second time?" now you suddenly turn around and said: "神州 Shenzhou incorrect. It is not the country that hosts the Olympics... It's the city that hosts the Olympics not the country.". So if anyone is contradicting themselves, it's apparently you. So the IOC accepted the bid for Beijing to host, then what's wrong with Beijing hosting twice? Since you accepted that LA and Lake Placid can host the Olympics twice, then can't Beijing do the same? You said: "Wonder why a country the size of China would choose the same city to host the Olympics again. It doesn't work that way in the United States." China is obviously not the United States, and neither is the U.S China, so why are you seemingly imposing the U.S standards onto China? If I'm not wrong, even Japan has hosted the Olympics in Tokyo twice. You said: "I think it's nonsense for people to be boasting about it." But Beijing has broken ground and made Olympic history by being the first to have the honor of hosting both the Summer and Winter Olympics, of which no other city have done so before. Even when you boasted that U.S cities have the infrastructure to host both types of Olympics, ultimately it was Beijing that was the first city to achieve this, so why is it nonsense?
    1
  15537.  @catmandu6776  "神州 Shenzhou I don't care that you were only talking about the city. I was talking about the country and I have made it very clear why I was talking about the country." But you later said: "神州 Shenzhou incorrect. It is not the country that hosts the Olympics... It's the city that hosts the Olympics not the country." so why'd you made it about the country, when I was originally talking about the city, Beijing? Everyone can see on this post, that I originally talked about the city, Beijing, it's you who started bringing up the country, China, yet you can't wrap your heard around this? You said: "I do not care about cities hosting two or even three times. I DO NOT CARE." Then why'd you said: "神州 Shenzhou wonder why a country the size of China would use the same city to host the Olympics for a second time? You want to spin it like it's a good thing but it's really not." All I said was that Beijing is officially the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both the Summer and the Winter Olympics. You said: "With that said, I believe that it was a failure on the part of China. The same city hosting only 14 years apart? By the time LA host the Olympics in 2028, it will have been 44 years since LA last hosted and 2 other American cities have hosted since then." How is that a failure on the part of China? Whether it's 14 years or 44 years, depends on which city won the bid by the IOC. You yourself agreed that Olympic Committee accepted the bid for Beijing, then isn't it remarkable that in just a short span of 14 years, Beijing was able to host the Olympics twice? And both a Summer and Winter Olympic to boot. You said: "China had a golden opportunity to show the world more of their vast country and put another city on display for the world to see but failed to do so. They failed to do so, because Beijing is the only city in China that is capable of hosting an Olympics." But you yourself said that it's the city that hosts the Olympics, not the country. Also, do you have evidence that Beijing is the only city in China that is capable of hosting an Olympics? Otherwise, it's just your own speculation, just like your claim that U.S cities have the infrastructure to host both the Summer and Winter Olympics. You said: "That's not something to celebrate. It's sad really. I would be embarrassed if the Olympics was hosted within the United States twice in a 14 year time frame and same city was selected to host both times." Your feelings of embarrassment appear to be your own. Getting selected twice in just 14 year time frame as compared to a 44 year time, demonstrates that the city won the bid by the IOC in such a short time, and Beijing took it a step further by being the first in Olympic history to host both the Summer and Winter Olympics, that even U.S cities have not achieved despite having the infrastructure (according to you). How's that not a call for celebration?
    1
  15538.  @torukmakto7855  China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html Why did so many countries watch the epidemic unfold for weeks as though it was none of their concern?
    1
  15539.  @DZ477  China notified the World Health Organization of a unknown coronavirus strain on 31st Dec 2019. By 12th January 2020, China had sequenced Covid-19 genome and shared the information with the WHO. Your Western countries had months to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. China had mere weeks to prepare. Source: China bought the West time to deal with virus but the West squandered it straitstimes.com/opinion/china-bought-the-west-time-the-west-squandered-it
    1
  15540.  @DZ477  Dr Li Wenliang was spreading rumours about the coronavirus being SARS (which is clearly untrue, Covid-19 is not SARS) so the government stepped in to stop the spread of falsehoods that's all. And Dr Li wasn't arrested, he merely signed a form agreeing not to spread unproven rumours that's all and he returned to work afterwards.
    1
  15541.  @DZ477  No, Dr Li Wenliang clearly called it SARS at first. Dr Li posted his comment on a private WeChat group among his colleagues and he actually told them not to reveal the information to the public. But someone from the group took screenshot of his post and made it known to the public. _Li Wenliang's messages in the "Wuhan University Clinical Medicine 2004" WeChat group on 30 December 2019_ (CST 17 : 43) Li: There are 7 confirmed cases of SARS at Huanan Seafood Market. Li: (Picture of diagnosis report) Li: (Video of CT scan results) Li: They are being isolated in the emergency department of our hospital's Houhu Hospital District.
    1
  15542.  @torukmakto7855  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  15543.  @torukmakto7855  America is actually dependent on China for almost 80% of its medicines, which is especially important given the current situation. Fox Business reports that according to FDA estimate at least 80 percent of active ingredients found in all of America’s medicine come from abroad, primarily from China. And it’s not just the ingredients, China wants to become the world’s dominant generic drug maker. So far Chinese companies are making generic for everything from high blood pressure to chemotherapy drugs. 90 percent of America’s prescriptions are for generic drugs. Source: U.S. is Dependent on China for Almost 80% of Its Medicine saraacarter.com/u-s-is-dependent-on-china-for-almost-80-of-its-medicine/
    1
  15544. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15545. Most of the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15546. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15547. I agree. In truth, China's initial tariffs on soybeans and other US imports remain unchanged so far
    1
  15548.  @peekaboopeekaboo1165  What's going to happen to those Palestinians displaced overseas? Will they be allowed to return home is a two state solution is achieved?
    1
  15549.  @peekaboopeekaboo1165  What about those displaced Palestinians whose homes were on land now occupied by Israel? Many of them even continue to keep the house keys till this day.
    1
  15550. Do you have evidence that the communist party of China did this? Otherwise, did you read Peng Shuai's post (you can find the translated version on Reddit)? She previously had a tumultuous on-and-off relation with a much older man, spanning several years, but there were no allegations of sexual assault in her post.
    1
  15551.  @LouisTsuiful  难道你不懂英文，就重复我说的话？
    1
  15552. +Vishal Kumar CPEC project in Pakistan make use Chinese engineers and materials, because Pakistan does not have sufficient engineers and cement. Pakistan already planning double cement production to meet CPEC demands, and training more engineers to handle CPEC. Majority of CPEC jobs also go to Pakistan people according to (tribune.com.pk/story/1429131/cpec-provides-jobs-30000-pakistanis/ )
    1
  15553. +Desham Pravesh I don't see how China will become a hostage of Pakistan because of CPEC. For India admission into NSG, you need unanimous support of all 48 member nations of NSG, and about 9 other countries also oppose India's admission. USA's approach to dealing with terrorism is invade country, and in process kill many innocent people, making the locals angry and join the terrorists in revenge. For example, the rise of ISIS is credited to USA's constant interventions in Middle East Wars. For US, its only short-term solution, until another terrorist cell pops up to replace the one destroyed. China's approach different from USA. People join terrorists because they are poor, jobless, unhappy and angry with USA, own government etc. So China tries develop Pakistan economies, so that more people find work, and the terrorists will have ever shrinking pool of recruits willing to join them. This is long term solution that aims to solve/reduce problem of terrorists by improving the country's economic and thus, improving stability in the region.
    1
  15554. +Desham Pravesh If you think US navy does not control the sea lanes, then why have there been up to 4 reports of US destroyers colliding with civilian vessels in this year alone, such as the USS Fitzgerald, USS John McCain, etc. It's obvious that US Navy is stepping up its patrol routes, probably with inexperienced sailors which led to collisions. This type of collision is serious, and can possibly create scandal or even war, if say, a US destroyer collides with Chinese warship. The Hambantota port in Srilanka is for economic trade, even the Sri Lanka government does not allow Chinese military vessels to dock there, so why is it considered a military base? Besides roads, ports and railas, CPEC also invests in energy for Pakistan, including the building of various powerplants to fuel Pakistan's growth. And in South Africa, China built various roads, railways, schools, hospitals, hotels, stadiums, shopping centers and telecommunication projects. Lastly, the LEMOA agreement between India and USA, will not only affect China, but possibly Russia as well. Russia is against US attempts to encroach on its territory, which forms basis of China-Russia relations, and by growing closer to USA, India could potentially grow further from Russia. Soon the BRICS summit will held in China, and our countries should be cooperating to resist Western influence in our countries, not fighting over territorial disputes and growing closer to the West.
    1
  15555. +Desham Pravesh According to this source (therichest.com/rich-list/rich-countries/lets-sea-the-10-biggest-navies-in-the-world/ ) India actually has the 7th largest navy in the world. The world's largest is US Navy, followed by Russian Navy, PLA Navy (China), Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force, Royal Navy (UK), French Navy and finally, Indian Navy.
    1
  15556. +Desham Pravesh According to (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Navy ) under Operational fleet as of August 2017 Indian Navy has 1 aircraft carrier, 11 destroyers, 14 frigates, and 15 submarines. Japanese Self-defense Maritime force has 4 helicopter carriers, 26 destroyers, 10 frigates, 19 submarines. So how is India really considered 4th largest navy in the world? It should be USA, Russia, China, Japan and then India in terms of navy strength. Like jim kuan said, If India has the "naval strength" you claimed, then where is the exercise of control? If Indian naval power was so capable, then why isn't its presence being felt more keenly?
    1
  15557. +Desham Pravesh That link you keep sending me, only represents the Future of the Indian Navy, not the present. The Wiki I used is dated to Indian Navy's Operational fleet as of August 2017 so why do you keep insisting that it is outdated? Its as close to the present as it can get. The INS Vikrant is under construction in your wiki, and the submarines are still being planned or under construction as well.
    1
  15558. +Desham Pravesh Its not even 2018 yet, so why are you constantly posting possibilities in the future. Even the your wiki "Future of the Indian Navy" clears indicates that these vessels are only being planned and have not been fully incorporated into Indian Navy. There could be various reasons it not being reflected in "Indian Navy's Operational fleet as of August 2017" There could be delays, bribery of officials, and unforeseen circumstances and so on. The Scorpene class submarines are undergoing trials, but that doesn't mean that it is operationally ready. That's why it has been listed as "Future" not "Present" so why are you relying on data that only potentially represents Indian Navy in the future, and not the present Indian Navy data?
    1
  15559. Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15560. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15561. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  15562. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15563. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15564. Even Taiwan's own constitution acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15565. I've been to some European restaurants and even in the toilet, you are obliged to tip the staff. Pay 1 Euro, just for them to guide you to your cubicle in the toilet!
    1
  15566.  @zzm2405  So in Berlin did you also encounter staff in the restroom, waiting for you to tip them (1 euro minimum) just to show you to your cubicle?
    1
  15567.  @naniy7736  Video: China: Factory produces 5,000,000 masks a day in bid to supply shortfall youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw?t=17
    1
  15568. Frankly speaking, Trump is actually one of the few U.S President that did not start any new hot war during his term. In fact, Trump actually facilitate U.S withdrawal from Afghanistan through negotiation with Taliban (however, it is Biden that carried out the botched withdrawal). Before he became president, Biden has previously supported wars in Middle East.
    1
  15569. American: "Why don't you immigrants go back to where you came from?" Immigrant: "Because the U.S destroyed my homeland and forced me to become a refugee."
    1
  15570. "Any regime that has a "president-for-life" is illegitimate." President Xi Jinping has only been in power for 6 years, yet already he's considered president-for-life? What about German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who's been in power for 13 years?
    1
  15571.  @MarkYeung1  "Let's say if Turkey for some reason decided to invade the Palestine Friday morning. Can Palestine defend itself?" Again you're conflating the right to self-defense with the right to armed struggle against an occupying power. Like when Imperial Japan occupied the Chinese province of Manchuria during WWII, are you saying that Japan has the right to self-defense with their forces occupying Manchuria?
    1
  15572.  @MarkYeung1  Of course Koreans have the right to armed struggle when they were occupied by Japan. Just like Japanese-occupied parts of China had the right to resist Japanese occupation. On the same note, Palestine has the same right to armed struggle against the occupying forces of the IDF.
    1
  15573. Hampering of exports? Russia agreed to the Ukraine grain deal, only if EU promised to allow Russia to export their own grain to feed the rest of the world.
    1
  15574. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15575. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15576. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15577. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15578. Yes, Chinese soldiers too big to fit in our own tanks, so instead we hire Americans to drive them. PLA held livefire exercises, involving tanks, artillery, armored carriers, etc, to scare off Indian soldiers in Donglong, and they were all driven by skinny Americans because our own soldiers too big to fit in.
    1
  15579. A recent survey for kids showed: Chinese kids' dream: Astronaut American kids' dream: YouTuber …… Source: Chinese kids want to be astronauts while American kids want to be YouTubers shanghai.ist/2019/07/19/chinese-kids-want-to-be-astronauts-while-american-kids-want-to-be-youtubers/
    1
  15580.  @voiceofreason6515  "神州 Shenzhou That's what a reasonable person would think when reading your comment," And a blind person would accuse me of saying that Taiwan stagnated because of a lack of freedoms, yet when asked to quote those words, he cannot do so. So I take it that you're unable to quote me my words saying that Taiwan stagnated because of lack of freedoms?
    1
  15581.  @joincoffee9383  "神州 Shenzhou lots of times, the increasing in exports has not much to do with the dictatorship," The Taiwan Miracle was a result of policies by the KMT dictatorship, for example, the land reforms that removed the landlord class and created a higher number of peasants who, with the help of the state, increased the agricultural output dramatically. However, the government imposed on the peasants an unequal exchange with the industrial economy,. Several government bodies were created and four-year plans were also enacted in Taiwan, so it's clearly the KMT government that's responsible for Taiwan's economic growth.
    1
  15582.  @joincoffee9383  "Money is important but it’s not everything, you should understand if you are a human." Economic growth is not everything of course, but when economic growth is absent, then how can one even talk about other issues like sense of freedom? Take the United States for example, and according to Kishore Mahbubani, the bottom 50% of lower income groups have grown poorer these past 40 years, yet the U.S still preaches on about "freedom and human rights"?
    1
  15583.  @joincoffee9383  "神州 Shenzhou so you are saying once an authoritarian system always an authoritarian system?" I'm pointing out that Taiwan was at its most economically prosperous under the authoritarian single-party rule of the KMT (whom btw, imposed martial law on the island for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Since the authoritarian system clearly worked for Taiwan, then why fix what isn't broken?
    1
  15584.  @joincoffee9383  You said: "You have some slave mentality there my friend. Wake up, you don’t have to be forever a slave," Why do Voice of Reason and you adopt such condescending attitudes towards me, just because I expressed views that differ from yours? I pointed out that Taiwan was economically prosperous under authoritarian rule, and I also pointed out that mainland China's political system has shown to be successful for our country, yet you and Voice of Reason accuse me of having a "slave mentality"? Just for pointing out a system that worked for Taiwan island and works for mainland China? Not all countries have to adopt Western liberal democracy to be successful, and China is living proof of this. Why do you accuse people who disagree with you as being of a slave mentality?
    1
  15585.  @joincoffee9383  "神州 Shenzhou KMT's level of achievement, comparing to who or what" KMT's achievement in Taiwan compared to the DPP in Taiwan today. Much of Taiwan's economic prosperity occurred under authoritarian, single-party KMT rule and yet it was replaced by Western style democracy, after which Taiwan's economy began to stagnate, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and so on.
    1
  15586.  @joincoffee9383  "神州 Shenzhou China has the highest Gino index." That's incorrect, it's South Africa that has the highest gini coefficient. China has the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people, so obviously not everyone in China will have the same level of prosperity. President Xi's campaign of "Common Prosperity" aims to bring China's wealth from the rich Eastern port cities (i.e Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, etc) to the landlocked Western Regions (i.e Tibet, Xinjiang) through the Belt and Road Initiative.
    1
  15587.  @joincoffee9383  "神州 Shenzhou The Taiwan "economic prosperity" may not be due to authoritarian system." Go and read up on the Taiwan Miracle it was because of KMT land reform laws, abolishing landlords and freeing up peasants to increasing agricultural output. However, the government imposed on the peasants an unequal exchange with the industrial economy, with credit and fertilizer controls and a non monetary exchange to trade agrarian products (machinery) for rice. With the control of the banks (at the time, being the property of the government), and import licenses, the state oriented the Taiwanese economy to import substitutive industrialization. This shows that KMT dictatorship was responsible for Taiwan's economic prosperity.
    1
  15588.  @joincoffee9383  "神州 Shenzhou why fix it if it's not broken?? It was broken." It wasn't. Taiwan survived for most of its life under authoritarian rule, during which they experienced the most economic growth under KMT rule then why is there a need to change its system? Even now, look at the mainland and China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    1
  15589.  @joincoffee9383  You asked: "神州 Shenzhou were the Four Asian Tigers all authoritarian system nations?" South Korean dictator Park Chung Hee began a series of economic reforms that eventually led to rapid economic growth and industrialization, now known as the Miracle on the Han River, (漢江의 奇蹟). When Park first came to power in 1961, South Korea was a dirt-poor, its per capita income was only US$72.00 (lower than sub-Saharan African countries) and it was North Korea that was the greater economic and military power on the peninsula. One of Park's main goals was to end the poverty of South Korea, and lift the country up from being a Third World economy to a First World economy via statist method. Park is credited with playing a pivotal role in the development of South Korea's tiger economy by shifting its focus to export-oriented industrialisation. But Park was also a dictator especially during his later year. In 1972, Park declared martial law and introduced the highly authoritarian Yushin Constitution, where political opposition and dissent was constantly repressed and Park had complete control of the military, and much control over the media and expressions of art. Park is a controversial figure in modern South Korean political discourse, credited for sustaining the Miracle on the Han River, which reshaped and modernized South Korea, while also criticized for his authoritarian way of ruling the country. Source: Wikipedia: Park Chung-hee
    1
  15590.  @joincoffee9383  You asked: "神州 Shenzhou were the Four Asian Tigers all authoritarian system nations?" Hong Kong's economic growth was achieved while it was under authoritarian British colonial rule, during which virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong while it was a British colony. Only when Hong Kong was returned back to mainland China in 1997 did Hong Kong people finally had the opportunity to vote for their favorite leaders, under the One Country, Two System policy. So technically speaking Hong Kong's economic growth occurred under the authoritarian British colonial system. As for the last tiger, Singapore has been under the authoritarian single-party PAP rule for their entire life as a nation. For 56 years, the People's Action Party ruled Singapore with an iron fist, and Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore's founder) was a dictator who jailed/exiled dissenters and political rivals (whether real or perceived) but under PAP leadership, Singapore has prospered from a sleepy fishing village nation into a world class country today, compared to neighboring ASEAN countries.
    1
  15591.  @voiceofreason6515  You said: "The world is not black and white or has to spelled out word for word for people to understand." The problem is that people like you see things in black and white. The fact that China's political system has shown to be successful without adopting a Western style democracy irks people like you. To you, it's every country is either a Western Style democracy or it isn't. You said: "Your whole text taken together had the meaning I’m saying." It's apparent by now that you're simply unable to quote me my words saying Taiwan stagnated because of a lack of freedoms (else you would have done so by now). Because I never said such things, I clearly pointed out that Taiwan's economy prospered under authoritarian single-party rule of the KMT. The only time I've mentioned Taiwan stagnating was when it became a democracy, so how's that even got to do with a lack of freedoms?
    1
  15592. Many Westerners (not all) believe that their countries are democratic, just because they get to cast their votes during elections. But if their governments aren't able to deliver what the people want, then this is just procedural democracy that's all.
    1
  15593.  @kuga7423  Chinese know first-hand the debilitating effects of addictive substances and how much they can weaken a country. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything from the West, so the British waged war and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint.
    1
  15594. The Nationalists wanted control of China for themselves, and the Japanese were invading China and occupying territories. If they ally, then whose going to control captured territories? Its like if Shanghai was captured, then do the Nationalists control it or the Japanese? The Nationalists weren't going to share China with Japanese (or the Communists for that matter)
    1
  15595. "Well, obviously Japanese would have to return all of Chinese holdings to the nationalists." Then what will Imperial Japan stand to gain from an alliance with the Nationalists? Japan invaded China, Korea, Philippines, SE Asia, because they wanted to rule those countries isn't it? What's the point of taking Chinese territory by force, and then giving it back to the Nationalists from the Japanese viewpoint?
    1
  15596. +Mamabishh According to the following source, there is high percentage of child malnutrition in Jaintia Hills, yet India government is encouraging more women to give birth to more than two? Can these women even afford to support two children even with the incentives? Its rather inefficient in my opinion, that you have this system where you have more child births, which drain more of India's resources and instead of solving the problem, only causes more child malnutrition instead. Over 60% children in Meghalaya malnourished timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/guwahati/Over-60-children-in-Meghalaya-malnourished/articleshow/22110509.cms About family planning, what percentage of families actually take family planning seriously? You said families should want more but also know when to stop, but it doesn't mean people will follow your instructions to the letter. If every family wants more children, then you will be in trouble because it leads to more child malnutrition and there just aren't enough schools in India to send all those kids to. So why waste more resources on incentives when it doesn't solve the problem of not enough food and schools?
    1
  15597. +Crab Synth So the maid with 11 kids, did all her kids survive to adulthood? Did they attend school and graduate to find a job? Or did about 1/2 of them die because of child malnutrition, or not enough schools and healthcare? Imagine an alternative scenario, if that maid had only a single child to raise. She could have lavish all those resources (which would be spent raising 11 kids) on raising a single, healthy, educated kid to adulthood.
    1
  15598.  @Don-sx5xv  The problem is BRICS doesn't have the same miltary obligations as NATO's Article 5, calling upon all members to react to a member being attacked. In fact, India even hijacked a BRICS summit to bring up its border dispute with China.
    1
  15599.  @snakevenom56  Personality, I think Brazil and South Africa were included into BRICS so that apart from representing the EurAsian landmass (Russia, India, China) they have also have a finger in South America (Brazil) and Africa (South Africa) as well.
    1
  15600. Agreed. After the USSR dissolution, NATO effectively serves no interest, except the US's.
    1
  15601. China has demonstrated anti satellite capabilities in 2007, by taking out a satellite in orbit using missile launched from the ground. How will the rest of the war pan out if PLA takes Indian army satellites out of commission?
    1
  15602. 韋龍 ROC claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, etc) as part of their territory. ROC also claims parts of Mongolia, Burma, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan as part of its territory. So who is the cult organization here? Who lost the Chinese civil war in reality but still believes that it controls the territory of Qing Dynasty China? Source: Map of ROC Administrative and Claims en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg
    1
  15603.  The New Nazis  Taiwan island inalienable part of China.
    1
  15604.  @spafon7799  What makes you think the CPC cripples them? It was Mao Zedong that decided China should not be left behind in the space race (he said: "我们也要搞人造卫星"; lit. 'We too need satellites')
    1
  15605.  @stusanderson3111  That's because Spain and French aren't really China's true rival, if you go by the OP's logic.
    1
  15606.  @stusanderson3111  Chinese immigrants have settled all over the world. Located in virtually every major city in the world is a Chinese district where people can gather to appreciate Chinese culture and sample Chinese cuisine. These districts are more commonly known as "Chinatowns" and they are everywhere! Have you been to your nearest Chinatown? The shop signs and restaurant menus in these Chinatowns contain Chinese characters in them. I mean, Chinese make up to 20% of the world's entire population after all. Learning Chinese language and culture helps one to connect better with up to a fifth of humanity on the planet. Especially now that USA is in decline and China is rising, our language is only going to become more prominent in the future.
    1
  15607.  @stusanderson3111  I mean, everyone has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your lands and spending money on your tourist industries. Tour guides are offering guides in Mandarin Chinese and Chinatowns exist in virtually every major city in the world where they have menus written in Chinese.
    1
  15608.  @Darkknight-dn4wc  Remember back in 2014, Russia had that military intervention in Crimea and annexed it from Ukraine, and all Washington did was impose sanctions on Moscow that's all. No US-Russia war. So what makes you think America is willing to go to war with mainland China over Taiwan? Most of the UN countries (including USA) recognise Taiwan as part of China under the One China policy, so if Taiwan declares independence, then it would be regarded as an internal Civil War within China (or the continuation of the Chinese Civil War) so why would UN slap sanctions on an internal war within China?
    1
  15609.  @deadjosh13  Taiwan was where the Kuomintang retreated to after they lost the mainland to communists, so why can't China reunify our country as One China?
    1
  15610. Before there was 加油, there was an even older term called 万岁.
    1
  15611.  @Jamrock151  Agreed. Modern India was actually recently unified by the British when they drew India's border. But I got the info from Angus Maddison's study, which classifies India as such.
    1
  15612.  @zikoza4829  My bad. You are correct, it is around 23% individually for India and China and combined together, India and China made up almost half of the world's GDP at that time from 1-1800 AD, before the British came along.
    1
  15613.  @walterwayne3081  Agreed. The China-India border was arbitrary drawn by the British and named after Henry McMahon, ignoring the preexisting historical boundaries and without consulting all involved parties. It's basically a colonial remnant, yet the McMahon line still remains as a dispute today between China and our neighbor, India.
    1
  15614.  @kumarsatyam5634  Who says Google, Facebook and YouTube banned in China? Can you link a source saying that those websites are banned in China?
    1
  15615. Peng Shuai is trying to lay low and avoid the public eye for a while until this all blows over, and she has expressed her desire for personal privacy during a video call with IOC. But the WTA is trying to pry into her personal affairs and demanding she appear in public and bare her private life for all the world to see.
    1
  15616.  @calvinblue894  Is there something wrong when a country becomes pro-China? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  15617.  @calvinblue894  I've been to Singapore before and from my experience, some of the locals there (but not all) can be quite anti-China. When I speak Mandarin to the locals, Chinese Singaporeans can detect the mainland accent in my voice and some start treating me coldly, knowing that I'm from the mainland. But when I open my mouth and speak English, many Singaporeans start warming up.
    1
  15618.  @ArchesBro  Singapore actually appears to be US ally to China (at least, this is my personal view). Reason being that U.S Aircraft Carriers can dock in Singapore's naval base on their way to the South China Sea. Singapore also ordered four American F-35 fighter jets for their airforce, thus Singapore is supporting the U.S Military-Industrial complex by doing so.
    1
  15619.  @ArchesBro  I heard Singapore has pre-ordered or is in the process of buying at least four American F-35 fighter jets from the US military, although I'm not sure whether the transaction has taken place or in still in the works. Either way, I agree with you that such a purchase means that Singapore is tying their defense cooperation to the United States, since it makes them dependent on U.S maintenance of such advanced aircraft. You said: "Anyway, I'm disappointed that Peng Shuai appears to be pinned down by the Chinese government. Sexual misconduct is not limited to China." Peng Shuai has denied the allegations of sexual assault. I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and it appears that she consented to sex, and that she didn't make any allegations of sexual assault in her post. Peng Shuai wrote: "Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well." So according Peng Shuai's post, the sex is consensual and there appears to be misunderstanding in the Western media of sexual assault, when she did not make any such allegations. On 17th Nov, Peng Shuai confirmed this through an email to Steve Simon of WTA, saying that she was at home resting, that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about
    1
  15620.  @ArchesBro  Isn't nationalism the glue that holds a country's people together, especially during times of crisis? In the USA, there are many nationalistic slogans like "Make America Great Again!", "America First!" or "God Bless the United States of America!" because who else is going to fight for America, if not Americans themselves? But we need to distinguish between nationalism and patriotism. Patriotism is a love of country and devotion to a particular way of life, which one believes to be the best in the world but has no wish to force upon other people. Nationalism however, is a belief that not only is one's country's system and way of life is superior to all others in the world, but seeks to impose this system onto others at other's expense. I personally believe China's political system, while not perfect, it has shown to be viable for our country and extremely successful to boot. You said: "China is closing itself off from the world right now because it is about to experience intense economic pressure from the housing market bubble starting to pop and shrinking population." I don't feel that China is closing ourselves off. Next year, China is hosting the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics, inviting athletes from countries to visit Beijing. UN figures show China was the largest recipient of new foreign direct investment in 2020, overtaking the US for the first time. The Chinese economy brought in 163 billion dollars compared to the 134 billion attracted by the United States. Video: China overtakes US as top country for foreign investment | DW News youtu.be/o-VHewwSz3A If anything, China is only closing ourselves off because the government observes a Zero Covid policy, while most of the rest of the world don't. Other than that, how is China closing ourselves off?
    1
  15621.  @ArchesBro  "神州 Shenzhou That WTA email seems extremely suspicious and unbelievable. A" Because that is an English translation of what Peng Shuai's email to WTA was in Chinese. A Singapore newspaper Lianhe Zaobao has interviewed Peng Shuai at a skiing event in Shanghai where Peng Shuai again denied the allegations of sexual assault, saying in Mandarin: "I have never said or written that anyone has sexually assaulted me, I have to clearly stress this point", and that there had been misunderstandings about her post on Weibo. Here's the video: youtu.be/ZF9Owb9uSOE Peng Shuai has also clarified that she wrote the email to Steve Simon in Chinese, and her English skills weren't good enough to translate the Chinese into English. She did mention that the Chinese media translation of her email was accurate in expressing her original wishes. You said: "Also the video that was released of her in the restaurant was suspicious with the date printed on a piece of paper posted at the entrance and a clip of the guy discussing what the date was." I don't understand, how's that suspicious? Peng Shuai has been filmed in public attending dinners and award ceremonies for youth atheletes. She was also filmed by Singaporean media reporter at an International Ski Federation cross-country skiing event in Shanghai with former athletes such as Yao Ming in attendance, so it's clear that she's not "missing" nor is she not going out in public.
    1
  15622.  @ArchesBro  You said: "In the original post of hers, she doesn't allege rape, but that she didn't have a choice because of the power dynamic and she was pressured to have sex she didn't want, writing that she cried the entire time." Peng Shuai was initially upset at the beginning but she didn't cry the entire time because she had known Zhang Gaoli since before he became a Politburo Standing Committee member, and she recalled her feelings for him since seven years ago and that's why she consented to sex in the end. After that, she renewed her love for him and Zhang treated her well according to her words. Here's Peng Shuai's post again: Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well. We talking about recent history, as well as ancient eras. You educated me on so many topics, and we had discussions about economics, politics. We never ran out of things to talk about. We played chess, sang, played table tennis, played pool and also played tennis together. We always had endless fun. It was as if our personalities fit perfectly together. Here's a read through of the entire post by Peng Shuai video:youtu.be/cvTUvvePJYg You said: "This whole incident has totally destroyed the Chinese government's credibility" How did it destroy the Chinese government's credibility? As far as I know, the Chinese government has remained mostly silent on the issue of Peng Shuai and has not publicly commented on the issue. The closest comment said by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson is that "China opposes the politicization of sports." You said: "Atleast in the USSR they were trying something new, socialism, and they thought it would work... until it didn't and it was a disaster" I don't believe the USSR was a disaster. Before the 1917 Communist Revolution, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe at that time. Only about 15% of the population lived in towns, and fewer than 10% worked in industry. 80% of Russia was agrarian, dominated by peasants whose traditional household economies were extremely inefficient compared to agriculture in Western Europe or the United States. Russia was technologically backward and lagged behind the more advanced Western European countries before the communist revolution. After the 1917 Communist Revolution by the Bolsheviks, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe at that time, both economically as well as militarily (that's one reason why NATO was formed in response to USSR's growing military might). The Soviet Union was also the world's 2nd largest economy (after the United States) during it's heyday from 1960 to 1965. Source: Soviet Union was world's 2nd largest economy from 1960-1965 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_largest_historical_GDP#By_average_values_of_GDP_(nominal) Such an ideology that transformed what was once arguably the poorest country in Europe to its strongest, and yet many Westerners only seem to look a the negative side of Marxism and communist ideology. The USSR eventually collapsed in late 1990s because they tried to adopt Western-style democracy and economic reforms too quickly.
    1
  15623.  @ArchesBro  "神州 Shenzhou Lol, the Olympic Committee is incredibly corrupt. Most likely the Chinese government gave the International Olympic Committee (IOC) a lot of money, so they get to host it." That's a serious accusation, do you actually have evidence that the Chinese government gave the IOC a lot of money so Beijing gets to host it? If not, then I'm afraid it's just your speculation without proof that's all. You said: "You don't believe me that CHina is closing itself off from the world? Im sure you know the rest of Chinese people arent allowed to use the internet the rest of the world uses, like YouTube. The Chinese government specifically created their internet system to prevent Chinese people from getting information from the outside world." I cited the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics because it's an example of China opening up Beijing to international athletes from all over the world, so if China was closing up then Beijing wouldn't bother to host the Olympics at all. As for the Internet, China literally has the world's largest number of Internet users at 1 billion users. Here's a List of countries by number of Internet users: List of countries by number of Internet users 1. China: 1,010,740,000 users 2. India: 833,710,000 users 3. United States: 312,320,000 users 4. Indonesia: 212,354,070 users 5. Brazil: 160,010,801 users ... Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_Internet_users#Table As for YouTube, nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so? You asked: _"If China's system was successful, why is China so poor per capita compared to the entire region other than India? This can be explained by mathematics. China has to host the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people. So if you're comparing GDP per capita, then if you divide our GDP by our enormous population, then of course you arrive at at low GDP per capita for China. The same goes for India having the world's 2nd largest population and that's why the GDP per capita for India is very low when you divide it by its enormous population. Because China and India are the world's 2 most populous country in the region. But what's interesting is that China managed to achieve a higher GDP per capita than India, despite India being a Western-style democracy and China having a larger population than India.
    1
  15624.  @ArchesBro  You said: 'Taiwan was liberated when the US ordered Japanese soldiers to return to the mainland and their economy boomed when the former government of China fled there." Taiwan's economic boom was achieved under authoritarian KMT rule. Taiwan had been under single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: White Terror (Taiwan) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Terror_(Taiwan) But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    1
  15625.  @ArchesBro  You said: "The Korean peninsula was involved in multiple conflicts and the Korean war in 1950 and it is still dramatically more wealthy than China." Korea was once a single unified country during Joseon Dynasty, until the Japanese invaded it and occupied it. After the 1945 WWII Japanese surrender, Korea was (needlessly) divided into North Korea (USSR) and South Korea (USA) and till today, the two Koreas have failed to reunify. By claiming the Korean Peninsula is dramatically more wealthy than China, are you comparing the per capita of both North and South Korea together? Also, initially S. Korea was dirt-poor country under democracy, and their economic boom was achieved under S. Korean dictator Park Chung-hee, who began a series of economic policies that brought rapid economic growth and industrialization to the nation that eventually became known as the Miracle on the Han River. (漢江의 奇蹟). When Park first came to power in 1961, S. Korea's per capita income was only US$72.00 and N. Korea was the greater economic and military power on the peninsula due to the North's history of heavy industries. One of Park's main goals was to end the poverty of S. Korea, and lift the country up from being a Third World economy to a First World economy via etatist methods, using the Soviet Union and its Five Year Plans as a model. Park is credited with playing a pivotal role in the development of South Korea's tiger economy by shifting its focus to export-oriented industrialisation. But despite his modernizing of S. Korea, Park was also a dictator. On 1972, Park declared martial law and amended the constitution into a highly authoritarian document, called the Yushin Constitution and during this time, political opposition and dissent was constantly repressed and Park had complete control of the military, and much control over the media. You can read more about Park here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Park_Chung-hee Suffice to say, S. Korea's industrialization and economic boom was achieved mostly under authoritarian dictatorship of Park Chung-hee
    1
  15626.  @ArchesBro  You said: "Japan's cities were completely burned by US firebombing and nuclear attacks before they surrendered, and they are dramatically more wealthy per person." Japan's industrialization occurred much earlier than either China's or Korea's. Japan first modernized during the Meiji Restoration (明治維新) and this was achieved not through democracy but under the authoritarian monarchy of Emperor Meiji (for which the period is named after). The individual powers held by feudal lords in the Shogunate (feudal lords) were consolidated under the Japanese Emperor, and as Japan rapidly industrialized, many old Japanese traditions (such as the Samurai Class) were abolished as they were seen as obsolete. Meiji Restoration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meiji_Restoration (The disenfranchised Samurai class rebelled against this and you can watch Tom Cruise in Hollywood's The Last Samurai where the remaining Samurai fought against an increasingly modern Imperial Japanese army) Suffice to day, Japan actually modernized way earlier than China and Korea, that's why shortly after Meiji Restoration, Imperial Japan became Asia's most powerful economy and military at the start of WWII. After WWII, Japan's economy suffered yes, but because Japan had a history of industrialization, they were able to bounce back quickly. And it should be noted that Japan's industrialization occurred under authoritarian monarchy of Japanese emperor, not under democracy. You said: "The answer is simple, with Russian influence, they tried socialism under that moron Mao and it destroyed the country's economy," Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. Back when Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  15627.  @judyhawkins6584  Kishore appears to be equating ASEAN with the EU, applying Asian thinking to a Western organisation. While he is no doubt knowledgeable about ASEAN, China's political system and the US's preconceived views about China, when it comes to Ukraine and Russia (also Gaza and the Middle East) he tends to follow the Singapore perspective (which largely follows the western perspective).
    1
  15628.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Certain "inconvenient truths" (ie the Tiannamen massacre) are not mentioned in the school books." Wikileaks cables from the United States embassy in Beijing have shown there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square back in June 1989. A Chilean diplomat (Carlos Gallo) and his wife were visiting Beijing at that time, and they provided eyewitness accounts to the events unfolding in Tiananmen Square. The couple said they were able to enter and leave the Square several times and were not harassed by troops. They remained with students by the Monument to the People's Heroes until the final withdrawal. The diplomat said that there were no mass shootings of students in the Square or at the monument.
    1
  15629.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Can you explain social and economic justice to hundreds of thousands of Chinese homebuyers," Today China is a country of homeowners with more than 90% of households owning homes (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations (Huang et al., 2020). Hong Kong's home ownership rate is just 51.5% in comparison.
    1
  15630.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Chinese housing is one of the most expensive in the world. Should these Chinese people vote for a different party?" Hong Kong is literally ranked world's 2nd most expensive property market in the world. Hong Kong's home ownership rate is just 51% compared with 90% for mainland China. Has voting for a different party ever solved Hong Kong's housing price problem at all? Then what's the use of Western-style democracy?
    1
  15631.  @bartonlee3594  "Yes, authoritarian states all repress free-thinking and the free exchange of ideas. Hence they are not "democracies" by any measure." Chinese President Xi (and also Russian President Putin) enjoy high level of approval from Chinese (and Russians respectively), doesn't this fit the definition of a government of the people, by the people, for the people? On the other hand, many Western leaders are experiencing abysmally low levels of approval, does this mean that their government aren't able to deliver what the ordinary people want?
    1
  15632.  @bartonlee3594  "authoritarian states all repress free-thinking and the free exchange of ideas. Hence they are not "democracies" by any measure." Surveys in China (and also in Russia) have indicated a high level of approval for Chinese President Xi (and Russian President Putin respectively), doesn't this fit the definition of a government of the people, by the people, for the people? In contrast, many Western leaders are experiencing historically low levels of approval from their own citizens.
    1
  15633.  @MarkYeung1  "Shenzhou. (Mainland) Chinese housing is one of the most expensive in the world with respect to corresponding personal income." Yet Homeownership in China is among the highest in the world, with rates exceeding 90% (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations (Huang et al., 2020).
    1
  15634.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Hong Kong housing was expensive already during British rule, but after returning to China, it is getting a lot worse." Yeah, because all those Western-style "freedoms, democracy and elections" did not resolve the fundamental housing issue faced by Hong Kongers. All it did was turn Hong Kong into a tax haven for foreign corporations. Since the Hong Kong government could not earn much revenue from corporate tax, they relied on taxing the sale of property to earn money. So when the Hong Kong property tycoons jack up land prices, the Hong Kong government close one eye, since land sales also means more revenue for the government. You said: "Should the people vote for a different leader? Hong Kong leaders have done a poor job so far." Voting doesn't solve the issue. As you said, land price was already expensive under British rule, and it became worst after the 1997 handover, when Hong Kongers finally get to vote for their leaders thanks to One Country, Two Systems. Imagine if Hong Kong had been under mainland government rule, then the home ownership rate might have gone up, instead of being just 51% for Hong Kong
    1
  15635.  @MarkYeung1  What makes you think Singapore has more freedoms and democracy than Hong Kong? Since its founding, Singapore has been ruled by authoritarian single-party PAP for 58 years (its whole life), much like how China has been ruled by CPC for 74 years. It's the same political party in charge of the country for decades.
    1
  15636.  @MarkYeung1  According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. - HRW: Singapore Doesn't Singapore's system sound very much like China's? Yet you're claiming that Singapore has more freedoms and democracy than Hong Kong?
    1
  15637.  @MarkYeung1  There are 8 other political parties in China apart from the CPC, and they are: -Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang (RCCK) 中国国民党革命委员会 (民革) -China Democratic League (CDL) 中国民主同盟 (民盟) -China National Democratic Construction Association (CNDCA) 中国民主建国会 (民建) -China Association for Promoting Democracy (CAPD) 中国民主促进会 (民进) -Chinese Peasants' and Workers' Democratic Party (CPWDP) 中国农工民主党 (农工党) -China Zhi Gong Party (CZGP) 中国致公党 (致公党) -Jiusan Society (JS) 九三学社 -Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League (TDSL) 台湾民主自治同盟 (台盟)
    1
  15638.  @MarkYeung1  "opposition parties can run... This is certainly not a one party state like North Korea or the PRC." So when have the opposition party ever been in power in Singapore? Even in the last election like you said, the PAP secured 61% so the PAP remains in power, as they have for the past 58 years, just like how China has been ruled by CPC for 74 years.
    1
  15639.  @MarkYeung1  "Shenzhou. one day opposition parties will be in power." The opposition in Singapore are weak, they exist primarily to make the PAP look good, and that's the reason why the PAP keeps them around. Strong opposition candidates once existed, but the PAP either sued them or exiled them, leaving behind the weaker candidates. Singapore's strength lies in the long-term PAP leadership, allowing Singapore to make long-term plans spanning 5-years, 10-years, 20-years, etc, because the PAP is always in power. Much like how China is able to make long-term plans because the CPC is expected to remain in power long term. Whereas if you look at the US for example, the American president have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only make short-term plans for America, instead of long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. It's one of the reasons why China is gradually winning in the geopolitical arena. Back then, even Taiwan's economy flourished under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, resulting in the Taiwan Miracle like I mentioned earlier. Taiwan's economic growth became more modest after the introduction of Western-style democracy, and now Taiwan's economy is stagnating under the DPP.
    1
  15640.  @Jonosan  Article 45 clearly states that the selection methods are subject to change in light of the actual situation in Hong Kong "The method for selecting the Chief Executive shall be specified in the light of the actual situation in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and in accordance with the principle of gradual and orderly progress." - Article 45. Given that 2019 was a year of rioting for Hong Kong, then Beijing reserves the right to make changes to the method for selecting the Chief Executive as per Article 45.
    1
  15641.  @Jonosan  You said: "In the year 2024, we find ourselves halfway through, yet democratic reforms have not only stalled but have also deteriorated." Did Article 45 ever specified a deadline to implement universal suffrage? Universal suffrage is mentioned as an eventual goal, but there's no deadline that Beijing has to stick to.
    1
  15642.  @MarkYeung1  New Zealand's Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has announced a nationwide lockdown after the country confirmed one coronavirus case. That's basically the same approach as China's Zero Covid Policy.
    1
  15643. You claimed Taiwan is independent then where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed the declaration and when was it signed? If not, then Taiwan is part of China according to their own constitution.
    1
  15644. China's solar power plant can even generate electricity at night.
    1
  15645. China's solar power plant can even produce power at night, thanks to molten salt technology retaining excess heat accumulated during the day to continue generating electricity long after the Sun has gone down.
    1
  15646. China's solar power plant can even continue to produce power at night, thanks to molten salt technology.
    1
  15647.  @yatarookayama8329  Watch “China in Africa: An African Perspective” by Gyude Moore to learn how the Africans view China.
    1
  15648.  @avalagum7957  About the 9 Dash Line, the Vietnamese PM Pham van Dong had acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands as Chinese territory in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. Source: Wikipedia: File:1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai
    1
  15649.  @kcg7861  With Chinese invention of paper, came inventions like paper lanterns, paper umbrellas and paper banknote (which made business transactions easier since merchants need not carry around lots of metal coinage and precious stones) Mankind's first aviation was in the form of paper kite, and even hot air balloons were invented in China, and were known as Sky Lanterns (天灯) or Kongming Lanterns (孔明灯) Here is beautiful video of RISE Lantern Festival in Las Vegas, celebrated with Chinese Sky Lanterns. Video: youtu.be/SNtwlBbBdb4?t=10 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  15650.  @kcg7861  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  15651.  @kcg7861  Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple were asked by lawmakers if they believed China steals technology from US companies. 3 of the 4 answered no whereas Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook said yes. Video: Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple respond to Congress about whether China steals US technology youtu.be/v6whxZm1ubQ
    1
  15652.  @kcg7861  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA. The test is given every three years to 15-year-olds around the world and measures their knowledge in reading, science and mathematics. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    1
  15653.  @kcg7861  Chinese universities produce the most STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) out of any other country in the world. Countries With The Most STEM Graduates 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/02/02/the-countries-with-the-most-stem-graduates-infographic/ This implies that China is going to play a much larger role in the STEM fields, given the sheer number of graduates produced in these fields.
    1
  15654.  @kcg7861  What reformat camps? Chinese people are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (national language of China) Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China. Just like Americans learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America.
    1
  15655.  @kcg7861  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    1
  15656.  @kcg7861  Look, China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  15657.  @kcg7861  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft interior and ventured out of the spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    1
  15658.  @yslee1401  Have you actually been to Xinjiang and see how prosperous it is? I showed people this short 3-min video of Beautiful Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience) Video: 新疆乌鲁木齐灯光秀抖音首发，请安静的看完 youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA
    1
  15659. Not only did PRC reject the ruling, but even ROC (Taiwan) rejected the ruling. According to Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs: The award rendered by the tribunal at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the South China Sea arbitration is completely unacceptable to the government of the Republic of China. The tribunal’s decisions have no legally binding force on the ROC.
    1
  15660.  @Smiler2724  What about it?
    1
  15661. More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), and took several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and left her with a lot of family property. After that, the ex-husband also paid off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain point, (but) she was smitten with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and dreams of someday marrying into the NATO family. But the truth is that the village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the family. After all, she was high-maintenance and loved to pocket his money (corruption). His many wives also didn't want Ukraine to join family, but in front of Ukraine, they were all smiles and encouraging her to join. The village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex-husband and wife quarrel, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Because of that, Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift an actual finger and partake in the fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would be obliged to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this analogy taken off Weibo helps puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict into perspective and on a more relatable level.
    1
  15662. It harkens back to the Yellow Peril mindset, which is the perception that Asians pose an existential danger to the Western world.
    1
  15663. According to Global Trade Alert, the U.S is the world's most protectionist country, having taken over 800 protectionist measures since 2008. The EU has over 300 protectionist measures, whereas China's is in the range of 200-300. (Source: Wikipedia: Protectionism: Current world trends)
    1
  15664. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15665. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15666. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  15667. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  15668. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  15669. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China according to its constitution. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  15670. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15671.  @D_2_M  China seeks win-win cooperation, whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    1
  15672. I hope those people watching the Fox News guy shouting: "You can stick your autonomy France!" realize who's the real puppet master.
    1
  15673.  @lainiwakura1776  Can't the Chinese government block Shang-Chi because of comments made by the lead actor? Disney's Mulan actress Liu Yifei also made a statement that she supports the Hong Kong Police, and this made some Westerners hysterical and threatened to boycott Mulan over remarks made by the lead actress. So can't China boycott Shang-Chi over comments that the lead actor made?
    1
  15674.  @physika  China only resent the fact that European countries are letting themselves be used as pawns by the U.S to maintain their hegemonic rule, through the use of NATO expansion to contain Russia (and possibly turning their sights onto China next).
    1
  15675. This question is for all those Christians and followers of Christ: Do you think Covid-19 is a plague sent by your God to punish mankind? After all, according to the Bible, your God has a history of punishing mankind through sending plagues of locust, fire, etc like the poor people of ancient Egypt.
    1
  15676.  @djunasidharta3812  Seems as though if your government don't control religion, then religion will start controlling your country. We some sort of regulating body to overseer religion, else religion will control the people. As for Brhm-a, are you perhaps referring to the Brahmin? The highest caste of the Indian caste system?
    1
  15677.  @moundercesar3102  In other words, the U.S is projecting onto China what they themselves are doing.
    1
  15678. 轮子只靠黑中国吃饭。
    1
  15679. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  15680. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15681. 轮子只靠黑中国吃饭。
    1
  15682.  @laserraiset3300  "神州 Shenzhou invented paper milleniums ago," And paper is still very much in use today, for thousands of years. Whereas modern computers have only been in use for tens of years in comparison. Everyone in the world has used paper at one point in their life, but not everyone in the world has access to a computer.
    1
  15683.  @laserraiset3300  The reason why the American dollar gain prominence was not because of electricity, internet, tv, radio, fridge, but it's because Saudi Arabia made a deal to price its oil in U.S Dollars. Oil is in demand all over the world, so countries obtain U.S dollars because it enables them to purchase Saudi oil, and this has contributed to the Dollar's longevity as the global reserve. However, recently Saudi Arabia is changing its mind, and allowing countries to purchase oil in other currencies, such as Indian rupee, Russian ruble and Chinese renminbi. This could potentially lead to a rise in an alternative currency to the global reserve.
    1
  15684.  @laserraiset3300  "神州 Shenzhou paper is not modern technology such as computers, planes," Correct. Paper has been in use for millennia, far more than the few decades of modern technology like computers, planes, etc. More people have used paper than have used computers. Not everyone has flown on a plane, but every country uses paper currency, which was invented in China.
    1
  15685.  @laserraiset3300  Western countries couldn't have build the modern world without paper isn't it? Even Chinese inventions like the Compass, helped sailors navigate through bad weather (and that's how Christopher Columbus found America) and Chinese invention of gunpowder allowed the West to colonize America.
    1
  15686.  @laserraiset3300  Western countries couldn't have build the modern world without paper isn't it? Even Chinese inventions like the Compass, helped sailors navigate through bad weather (and that's how Christopher Columbus found America) and even Americans celebrate the 4th of July with Chinese invention of fireworks.
    1
  15687.  @laserraiset3300  "神州 Shenzhou saudi arabia not only oil producers and who invented drill deep technologies, oil refine technologies" -The technique of oil drilling through percussion or rotary drilling has its origins dating back to the ancient Chinese Han Dynasty in 100 BC, where percussion drilling was used to extract natural gas in the Sichuan province. ...(Source: Wikipedia: Drilling Rig) -The use of petroleum in ancient China dates back to more than 2000 years ago...In addition, the Chinese were the first to record the use of petroleum as fuel as early as the fourth century BCE. By 347 CE, oil was produced from bamboo-drilled wells in China. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Petroleum) The earliest record of well drilling dates from 347 AD in China. Petroleum was used in ancient China for "lighting, as a lubricant for cart axles and the bearings of water-powered drop hammers, as a source of carbon for inksticks, and as a medical remedy for sores on humans and mange in animals." In ancient China, deep well drilling machines were in the forefront of brine well production by the 1st century BC. The ancient Chinese developed advanced sinking wells and were the first civilization to use a well-drilling machine and to use bamboo well casings to keep the holes open. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Well drilling) _ In ancient China, gas resulting from the drilling for brines was first used by about 400 BC. The Chinese transported gas seeping from the ground in crude pipelines of bamboo to where it was used to boil salt water to extract the salt in the Ziliujing District of Sichuan._ ... (Source: Wikipedia: Natural gas) The Chinese have been using brine wells and a form of salt solution mining as part of their civilization for more than 2000 years. The first recorded salt well in China was dug in the Sichuan province around 2,250 years ago. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Salt Well)
    1
  15688.  @laserraiset3300  "神州 Shenzhou sailors used observations of the Sun and stars to navigate" True, but what happens during bad weather, such as foggy conditions or when clouds obscure the sky and prevent navigators from finding out the position of the Sun and stars? That's where the Chinese invention of the Compass comes in handy.
    1
  15689.  @laserraiset3300  But what happens when fog and clouds obscure the sky and make navigation by Sun/stars impossible? That's where the Chinese invention of the compass comes into play, and made navigation possible, even under bad weather conditions.
    1
  15690.  @laserraiset3300  Wrong. Modern ships still use compass. Despite advancements with GPS, the compass is still a valuable tool. Many airplanes and ships still use highly advanced compasses as navigational instruments. Source: NatGeo
    1
  15691. Of all the ASEAN countries, only Singapore slapped sanctions against Russia.
    1
  15692. Actually, the Xi 习 in Xi Jinping 习近平 is pronounced more like "C" or "see"
    1
  15693. Michael S. "Anyways learning your language is much more difficult...The only other languages you'd have a hard time with are the ones with lots of characters, like Japanese, and ancient Egyptian or Sumerian." China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilizations still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since faded to history. The Chinese written language has been continuously in use since 1200 BCE whereas other ancient languages like Sumerian Cuneiform, Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered "dead" languages today. About speaking broken English in America, don't the local Americans consider these people who speak broken English as "non-Americans" or "foreigners"? Your Russian, Romanian and Chinese neighbours, do the local Americans consider them to be Americans? Have they bothered to learn English well and attempt to assimilate into American culture, rather than retain their own culture? If they didn't, then local Americans will tend to consider them foreigners living in America (even when they lived in USA for 30 years like you said) Since the same thing happens in USA, then why can't I say laowhy and serpentza don't consider China their homeland, or Chinese people their fellow countrymen? Integration is a matter of choice and effort, and people who don't make an effort (like those Russians, Romanians, Chinese in America that you mentioned), they aren't making attempts to Americanize themselves. That's why Americans tend to get frustrated with those people. Its the same in China. You said "Plus Mandarin is super super super difficult." Then likewise, I can also say English is super super super difficult. Difficulty is relative. Most Chinese can't speak English well, even Japanese and Koreans tend to speak horrible English. Look at the Russians and Romanians you mentioned having difficulty with English while in America. Wouldn't you say English is a difficult language too?
    1
  15694. +Michael S. Exactly. Most Americans (but not all) start labeling people who look exotic or speak broken English as foreigners in America and its the same thing in China. Just like those Russians and Romanians you mentioned, they are bound to be considered foreigners by Americans (whether they voice it or not) because of their poor English, despite living in USA for 30 years. The thing about USA is that there is so much stuff you simply cannot say and everyone is afraid speaking openly, because of a new phenomenon called "political correctness". This PC culture means people can't voice their true opinions, because its not the politically correct thing to do. For example, progressives in USA advocate LGBT rights, and people who speak out against LGBT get "shamed" (even when it might be their true opinion) The Transgender bathroom issue can be open to possible abuse by male sexual predators dressing up in order to sneak into women's bathroom. But because LGBT rights is considered "progressive" that many Americans join in without considering the possible consequences. But enough about America and I don't want to open a can of worms about LGBT issues. And yes, Chinese people aren't known for being politically correct. Its true that China has a common goal. Americans have the American Dream, where any poor immigrant to America can some day, strike it rich and become successful. The Chinese Dream is the eventual rejuvenation of China and in fact, the CCP put up many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 15-year plans, 20-year plans etc, to map our China's future in 2020, 2030, 2040 and to achieve specific goals by then. In my opinion, its much better to have a plan and a goal to achieve and to slowly work towards it. About learning a new language, it helps when in your entire environment, everyone is speaking it. Because America is so diverse, not everybody speaks English and that may account for why people speak broken English in America. Whereas in China, everything is in Chinese, including the signs, the menus, the stations names, yet serpentza and laowhy still only have basic understanding of Chinese language? Even after living in China for 10-15 years? Even their Chinese wives have to speak English to them (probably most of the time too) because they themselves refuse to integrate into actual Chinese culture. Especially while living in Chinese soil. If they were living in American soil, then I'll have nothing to say about that.
    1
  15695. Michael S. Its not just the language alone, its the fact that serpentza and laowhy don't make an effort to understand Chinese culture enough (language is merely the means to better understand Chinese culture) and all I want is to promote better understanding between our cultures is all. Sure, their lack of Mandarin proficiency won't impact Mandarin-speaking Chinese here much. But on the other hand, their English will influence their subscribers's opinion of China, and like I said recently, most of their latest videos have been largely negative about China, and frankly, I'm sick of them constantly complaining about China while residing in China. For example, one of serpentza's quirks is that he creates this whole "evil uncle" conspiracy, highlighting Chinese people looking at him and labeling them for staring at him. But look at serpentza, he dresses in a suit and sunglasses, (while the other Chinese around him are dressed casually) and he speaks loudly in unfamiliar English to his phone. So Chinese people are bound to stare at him (because of his dress and his language) and then he tags them as "evil" in his videos. Over the years, I've come to the conclusion that these two people don't mean China any good, and they mean China harm instead. Every video, they won't hesitate to criticise (even over the most minor issues) and yet, their subscribers continue to praise them (Patreon members make donations too) Its your America's choice if you want to call people who blame foreigners as "racists". But lets get real here, some of America's problems stem from just readily accepting immigrants into their country. For example, Muslims refugees often immigrate to America. But many Muslims continue to retain their religious beliefs like wearing Muslim veils for the women, instead of adapting to America's majority Christian religion. This creates social tensions, but the Americans can't voice their opinion (because they will be labelled as Islamophobes for doing so). Why can't people just be honest with themselves? Why hide behind the need to appear "politically correct"? Also, as far as I know, no Chinese blames serpentza for China's internal problems like pollution, corruption, food poisoning, etc. Chinese people are well aware of these problems and taking steps to fix it (such as the government planing to ban all non-electric cars by 2040 for example). But then, laowhy and serpentza will continue to nitpick and find faults with everything we do. About hating your neighbour because he has a nicer car or a nice house, I don't think Chinese people envy serpentza's or laowhy's position. They don't have Chinese citizenship, they drive modest cars and they live in apartments where the Immigration Department can call upon to inspect their VISAs. Also its not that Chinese people don't want to "work together" with serpentza and laowhy, but how to work together when serpentza and laowhy refuse to assimilate into Chinese culture? For example, does serpentza and laowhy ever team up with a local Chinese (who isn't their wives) to make a video together? Some Chinese subscribers drop by and appear in their videos once in a while, but you never get to hear their views. In the end, serpentza, laowhy, prozzie tend to stick to the same old groups instead. Like I said previously in my last paragraph: They themselves refuse to integrate into actual Chinese culture, especially while in Chinese soil. If they were on American soil instead, then I'll have nothing to say.
    1
  15696. The truth is that the United States couldn't stand to see a Chinese company like Huawei succeed and dominate 5G (the foundation of the next tech revolution) so U.S got Canada to arrest Meng in order to strike and economic blow against China and wound Chinese national pride in the process.
    1
  15697. Even though her party lost the election, Georgia's French-born President refuses to step down, all in the name of "democracy."
    1
  15698. Many Chinese have been overseas as tourists and students, so it can be said that Chinese more about the West, than the West know about China.
    1
  15699. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15700. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15701. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  15702. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15703. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, if you read its constitution.
    1
  15704. Actually, the Xi 习 in Xi Jinping 习近平 sounds closer to "C" or "See" than "She"
    1
  15705. China focuses on its domestic affairs, instead of focusing on other countries' internal affairs. U.S ignores its domestic affairs, instead it focuses on China's (and other countries') internal affairs.
    1
  15706.  Marshmallow Man  I showed people this short 3 min video of Urumuqi, Xinjiang's capital in China, and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! Video:youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD full screen for the best experience)
    1
  15707.  @dustyeyer3573  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. Chinese civilization had existed centuries long before the birth of Jesus Christ himself, and we have been governing ourselves just fine without divine intervention.
    1
  15708. War? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  15709. +Koninkrijk der Nederlanden "If Taiwan is annexed by China, then the USA has less power at the South China Sea." Taiwan also claims South China Sea Islands as part of its territory, when Republic of China published the 11-dash line back in 1947. USA supported ROC's claim and even sent US warships to SCS to help ROC liberate Japanese occupation of those islands. The USS Decker (DE-47) is one of such ships sent to aid ROC, and it was renamed ROCS Taiping 太平 under ROC navy. One of the South China Sea Islands was named Taiping Island in honor of the ship that liberated it from Japan.
    1
  15710.  @CitsVariants  lol if he's a communist, why is he getting sponsorship for his videos from a corporation?
    1
  15711.  @CitsVariants  Why would a communist be getting video sponsorship from a corporation?
    1
  15712.  @MarkYeung1  So you agree that there needs to more control over the social media platforms as to limit it's negative influence on children? That's what Chinese government is doing through restricting video game hours for minors under 18yrs. And who are you referring to by whistle-blower in China?
    1
  15713.  @MarkYeung1  The problem is that while China is willing to learn from America's mistakes, many Americans absolutely refuse to learn from China's successes. Especially regarding Covid-19, Chinese government's handling demonstrates its competence, yet Americans are unwilling to learn from China's success, only to assign blame to China. Video: Once upon a virus... youtu.be/Q5BZ09iNdvo
    1
  15714. So if Disney's Mulan was boycotted after the lead actress Liu Yifei made remarks supporting the Hong Kong Police, that means that Chinese can also boycott Shang-Chi based on remarks the lead actor made.
    1
  15715. In USA, "Thug Life" is often seen as "cool" but all it does is encourage American youth to commit robberies, experiment with drugs and sex, which may land them up in jail. Why'd you think USA has world's largest incarceration rate? Their prisons are congested and filled to the max, so much that sometimes inmates are released back on the streets, in order to relieve the overcrowded situation. Its your Western country's funeral, if you want continue blindly ignoring this problem and let your societal values deteriorate.
    1
  15716. Like I said, you Westerners can continue acting blind to the obvious and constantly cook up various excuses claiming that there's absolutely no correlation at all between high incarceration rates, high number of drug abuse, violent crime in America, with "Hip Hop" culture. You people are just defending hip hop because it is the "politically correct" thing to do. True, all those drugs activities and crimes existed before advent of Hip Hop, but it is this Hip Hop culture that exacerbates this "Thug Life" mentality and makes it look "cool" to young Americans. They are encouraged to drop out of school, commit robberies, experiment with drugs and sex, which may land them up in jail. Adults know about all the dangers, but young kids don't and teenagers want to act cool and rebellious by taking up life of crime this way.
    1
  15717. Firstly, the doctors and pharmaceutical companies also manufacture beneficial drugs for mankind, but they only prescribe the drugs, not advise you to abuse drugs. Its songs like Hip Hop culture that are encouraging kids to abuse drugs, not the doctors, so why blame the doctors? You people resort to insulting me, when your own logic doesn't add up at all? Sex is part of our biology, but what happens when it results in unwanted teenage pregnancies and unmarried mothers or uncommitted young parents? You people seriously believe that just because sex is good and part of human nature, means no problems and complications can arise from it? Can't you see the consequences instead of just resorting to insulting me that's all? I already stated that yes, many crimes and drug abuses existed before Hip Hop was invented, but again Hip Hop makes this problem even worst. But you people want to appear "politically correct" so you just overlook this problem that is afflicting your society and find various other excuses to blame, instead of address the obvious point.
    1
  15718. Like I said, its entirely your Westerners choice (and funeral) if you want to continue letting things go on like this. You speak of falling crime statistics, doesn't change the fact that USA has highest incarceration rate in the world. But you people rather act blind and constantly invent new excuses instead.
    1
  15719. Why copy my text into your comments? It just makes it difficult to read that's all. You still haven't explained what we should blame the doctors when they are merely prescribing drugs. It's hip hop music that encourages people to abuse drugs, and it is explicitly said in many of their song lyrics.In fact, it's usually the doctors who advocate safe sex and contraceptives, but which hip hop song ever sings about condoms? Why blame doctors then? People in poverty and broken families listen to hip hop, because it helps them escape. But hip hop encourages them to commit robbery and experiment in drugs to escape their lives. Why are you people acting blind to the obvious and constantly invent excuses? Or blame people like doctors of all people to blame? Hip hop musicians make money off promoting such vulgar songs, and you choose to blame doctors instead? Like I said, you people can invent all sorts of excuses to direct blame away from the root of the problem, but don't expect China to follow the Western if they want to degrade their societal values.
    1
  15720. I don't copy your text like what you keep doing to me. As for blaming the doctors, Swiss doctors have prescribed heroin as part of the rehabitation process for drug addicts, and the program has apparently met with success in Switzerland, so why you people keep insisting on blaming the doctors then? Where is your logic here? Why you people say stuff like "something as simple as smoking weed, a plant, something that harms no one, not even yourself" ? Even if it doesn't harm yourself physically, it can lead to addiction and possible turn people towards crime, so why you people fail to see the psychological harm, and continue justifying these actions? Even Hip Hop lyrics subconsciously influence people's thinking, with "f**K the police" being a prime example. As you shown, hip hop songs that promote contraception are extremely rare, and unpopular too. Songs featuring drugs, violence, sex are most popular, so why you people fail to notice something so simple? Nobody remembers any songs promoting condoms, because they are unpopular. On the other hand, hip pop artistes make millions composing songs about deviant behavior here. You people are just constantly cooking up various excuses for hip hop, while trying to direct the blame onto doctors instead. Westerners can always lead their country to ruin, but don't expect China to follow suit.
    1
  15721. +Juan Redcorn Again, why do you even think that blaming the doctors is the right thing to do? If kids or teenagers abuse drugs, you just blame the doctors for prescribing it? Not the whole education system? Not the hip hop culture that encourage drug abuse in the first place? How do you even expect you logic to make sense here? The doctor is just someone who prescribe the drug, he doesn't force you to take it. Hip Hop songs are played everywhere, and you don't even have to be avid listener of hip hop to know which ones are popular. The popular ones about sex, drugs, violence and a life of crime are popular and can be heard everywhere. Why'd you think a phrase like "F**K THE POLICE" which happened so long ago, but still popular today that you can still hear it now and then?
    1
  15722. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15723. No doubt, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  15724. Indeed, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15725. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, no doubt.
    1
  15726.  @sc1338  Imperial Japan committed numerous wartime atrocities like Nanjing Massacre, Unit 731, and comfort women issue. During the Nanjing Massacre, Japanese soldiers butchered Chinese men for sport, and held contest to see who could rack up the most kills. Chinese women were gangaped and killed, their bodies left exposed and mutilated, their nether regions bayoneted or having sharp sticks of bamboo shoved in. The young and elderly weren't spared, and Japanese soldiers sliced open the bodies of babies to do them. Japanese forced families to perform acts of incense; Sons were forced to do their mothers and fathers to daughters. Pregnant women were gangaped and had their swollen bellies stabbed, the unborn fetus torn from their wombs and bayoneted right before their eyes. Source: Nanjing Massacre wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanjing_Massacre#Massacre What did Chinese people do to deserve this? All Chinese people wanted to do was to defend our lands, and protect our homes and loved ones from the Japanese invaders, who stole our lands, plundered our wealth, killed our men and gangaped our women.
    1
  15727. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15728. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15729. German Chancellor Merkel served 4th terms, while President Xi is only entering his 3rd.
    1
  15730. President Xi Jinping is entering his 3rd term, but German Chancellor Angela Merkel served her 4th term.
    1
  15731. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served her 4th term while President Xi Jinping is entering his 3rd term.
    1
  15732. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China..........
    1
  15733. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.....
    1
  15734. German Chancellor Merkel served 4th terms, while President Xi is only entering his 3rd.
    1
  15735. According to the tale, Alibaba was the man who opened the cave of loot by the 40 thieves, so why is Alibaba considered a thief then?
    1
  15736. +David Miller Maybe you heard wrongly. Perhaps you stolen something from Saudi Arabian store that is from Alibaba Group and that's why the storeowner shouted Alibaba! (meaning he took my Alibaba product!) Yes, I think this explains it rather well.
    1
  15737. +David Miller Nowhere in the world does it ever say Alibaba means theif in Saudi Arabia. And in the tale of Alibaba, he was not considered one of the 40 thieves.
    1
  15738. +David Miller I am not living in the United States so why should I check my IP address in the first place? If you really are part of US cyber security then you aren't even doing a good job identifying who is in USA and who isn't.
    1
  15739. +David Miller I think you need to do a better job identifying who is living US and who isn't.
    1
  15740. Chinese government make many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans to map out China's long term future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc, because our leaders can remain in power long enough to implement those plans. But because you have democracy, then your leaders will have to eventually step down someday, so how can they make long term plans spanning decades? Look at USA, having only 4-8 year presidential term, so they make short term plans instead of long term plands.
    1
  15741. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15742. @TacticalMayo Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15743. China is purchasing Russia oil at a discount and then selling it to European countries at a profit.
    1
  15744.  @renemagritte8237  Communists transformed pre-1917 Russia from arguably the poorest country in Europe into arguably the strongest in Europe, as the Soviet Union. Initially, Tsarist Russia was dominated by peasants and only about 15% of the population lived in towns, and fewer than 10% worked in industry. But as the Soviet Union, it had the most powerful military in Europe as well as having the largest economy of Europe during its heyday. The Soviets also made various scientific and technological advancements during its time, such as launching the world's first satellite, Sputnik-1, into orbit.
    1
  15745.  @jager6863  Russia did not start WW2, but they indeed put an end to it. The last campaign fought of WW2 was the Soviet invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria, which finally caused Imperial Japan to surrender at the end of WW2. If not for the Soviets, then the world would be speaking German (and Japanese). Same with China, who had the 2nd most causalities out of WWII. Yet Soviet and Chinese allied supported has been seemingly all but forgotten in the West today.
    1
  15746.  @oleksii_klochko  "Shenzhou. Are you earning rubles by telling lies?" No but I'll bet you are.
    1
  15747.  @renemagritte8237  You lived 27 years? During Tsarist Russia era, the average Russian was only expected to live to around 30 to 35 years. But during the Soviet Union, the average Russian was expected to live up to 73 years, literally double the lifespan from before! Your increased lifespan is thanks to the Soviet Union.
    1
  15748.  @brianbetz7030  Imperial Japan refused to surrender even after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Furthermore, those are civilian targets, meaning that Japanese civilians were killed such as women, children, the elderly and men who were unfit for active military duty, while the Japanese military remain largely unaffected.
    1
  15749.  @oleksii_klochko  And it's thanks to the Soviet Union that there was progress and improvements in healthcare so that Russian lifespans literally doubled from Tsarist times. You just refuse to give credit to the Soviet Union where credit is due.
    1
  15750.  @oleksii_klochko  Remember, the Soviet Union had a far larger population at 285 million to take care of, compared to Finland's population of 5 million. Yet you give credit to Finland's government for their progress and healthcare for a smaller population, but not for Soviet government for the larger Soviet Union population?
    1
  15751.  @oleksii_klochko  Larger populations actually require more resources and more planning to support. But when utilized effectively, they become a engine for a country's economic development. The Bolsheviks transformed Tsarist Russia from once arguably the poorest country in Europe, into the strongest country in Europe as the Soviet Union. During its heyday, the USSR had the largest economy of any European nation, greater than even that of Germany. In terms of military, the USSR also had such military might that it resulted in the creation of NATO. The Soviet Union also made numerous advances in science and technological innovation such as launching Sputnik, the world's first satellite, and the first man in space was Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin.
    1
  15752.  @oleksii_klochko  Lack of education? The Soviet Union launched the world's first satellite, Sputnik-1 on 4 Oct 1957. The world's first man in space was Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, in April 1961. Are you saying that you didn't know this?
    1
  15753. Kira Yamato's Gundam
    1
  15754.  JustEnd  "神州 Shenzhou it is banned." That just means it is blocked, not banned. You can still access Western websites like Facebook, Youtube, etc, using VPN so what's your point? Don't you know the meaning of the word "banned"?
    1
  15755. Even in America, mosques are being built on American soil like in Virginia and not all the Americans are happy about it. Video: Anti-Muslim ranters ganged up on a Muslim man at a town hall meeting youtube.com/watch?v=INy4gaUrCL4
    1
  15756. Tiangong-1 was launched in 2011, with only expected operational lifespan of 2 years. Its already 2018 and the spacestation has long been decommissioned and reentry to Earth is the natural conclusion at the end of its service. Just like when American spacestation Skylab made news headlines when during its reentry in 1979.
    1
  15757.  @ryanshiflett2178  You said: "The best wall of defense we have is to get people vaccinated and then as time goes on, people will either get vaxxed or get infected." Again, vaccines alone are insufficient, even Cyrus Janssen got vaccinated and set got infected, so what do you mean by get vaxxed or get infected? You can still get infected even though you are vaccinated. There is clearly another line of defense that is to minimise transmissions as much as possible in order to reduce the likelihood of newer, deadlier, more transmissible variants emerging and this is the additional line of defense that China is undertaking.
    1
  15758.  @ryanshiflett2178  Since both you and I agree that vaccines alone are insufficient, that implies additional measures need to be taken, since vaccines alone are not enough to do the job. That's where reducing transmissions rates comes into play, because by doing so, the chances of newer, more deadly strains emerging becomes less with lower rates of transmissions. Additionally, even after you've been infected with Covid-19, it doesn't grant you immunity to the virus, because there are cases of people who've been infected and recovered from Covid-19 only to be reinfected later. Again, the best method is to reduce transmission as much as possible. Because if you just let the virus spread and mutate into newer strains, you'll never see the end of this pandemic, so how can you just talk about "moving past this pandemic"?
    1
  15759.  @ryanshiflett2178  1) I clearly said ineffective in curbing the spread, as even 70-80% vaccinated countries are reporting surges in Omicron variants. But you're strawmanning my argument by talking about higher defense against COVID effects, which wasn't the gist of my original statement. 2) I never said that herd immunity is zero infections. But the rise of a newer, deadlier, more transmissible variant (e.g. Delta variant compared to earlier variants) renders herd immunity moot, since more people can die from this new variant if it proves to be more lethal than previous variants. 3) You said: "Replying with “but there are cases where xxx happened” is a logical fallacy, you are pointing out the EXCEPTION, not the rule." How is it a logically fallacy to point out an exception to a rule? If anything, an exception literally proves that a rule is really not a rule after all, isn't it?
    1
  15760.  @ryanshiflett2178  1) So you misread my comment (which is about vaccines being ineffective in curbing the spread of Covid-19) and instead of refuting my point, you introduce your own point. This is you employing the "strawman fallacy" which has the impression of having refuting an argument, when the real subject of the argument was not addressed or refuted, but instead replaced with a false one (i.e your own point). 2) The fact that you admit Delta is deadlier than other strains even if marginally so, doesn't counteract my point. Deadlier is deadlier and that what the Delta variant is compared to previous strains. Additionally, Delta isn't the last variant and most likely Omicron isn't going to be the last variant. Again, my point is that herd immunity can be rendered moot when newer, deadlier variants emerge and cause more deaths. The best step is to minimise the chance of mutations, which can be achieved by reducing the number of transmissions and this is the path that China is undertaking. 3) You're asking me to go read a book on logical fallacies and critical thinking, when you're employing the "strawman fallacy" in the first point 1)?
    1
  15761. @Winnie the Flu China today is minimising the transmission of Covid-19 through lockdowns and curbing its spread. It's actually the United States that's just allowing Covid-19 to spread among its populace and new strains are arising as a result of this. Who is the real so-called "virus factory" here by allowing transmission?
    1
  15762.  @munmunwinchester  I believe I never said anything about long-term lockdown. Lockdowns are used to curb the spread of Covid-19, once that is complete, the cities can open up and the people return back to normal (with added precautions). Look at Wuhan today and they have reopened after lockdown once no more Covid-19 cases have been detected.
    1
  15763.  @MarkYeung1  Vaccines alone aren't sufficient, because newer Covid-19 strains are emerging as long as there's transmission. The best step is to limit transmissions as much as possible, thus reducing the likelihood of mutations resulting in possibly more virulent and lethal Covid-19 variants.
    1
  15764.  @Youdontshushh  About nukes, China is home to the world's longest range ICBM, the DF-41 with operational range between 12,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the US LGM-30 Minuteman range of 13,000 km. Video: China missile test DF-41 launch from railroad train youtu.be/h2kjMctT8yU
    1
  15765. @Francis America's nuclear carriers don't need to refuel, but they are still limited by the need to feed its crew members and pilots, so what's your point then? Not only does China have anti-ship ballistic missiles like the DF-21D "Carrier Killer," we also have a bigger variant, called DF-26, which has extended range, able to target US military bases in Guam. Hence the nickname "Guam Killer" Video: China's DF-26 ballistic missile drill sends 'clear message' to the US youtu.be/Y5f-qvnabHY The new Chinese DongFeng-26 ballistic missiles can hit the US territory of Guam. The mid-range missile can travel up to 5,740km (3,570 miles) and its in-flight maneuverability makes it easier to hit moving targets like aircraft carriers.
    1
  15766.  PTP120122  What makes you think I'm being paid to post these comments?
    1
  15767.  @jklok  Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (world's most spoken language by number of speakers) Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth and they learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America.
    1
  15768.  @soundmind4083  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15769.  @soundmind4083  Exactly. There is actual recorded footage of misguided Uighurs commiting acts of terrorism in China as shown here. (Warning: Footage may be disturbing for some viewers) Video: Liu Xin discusses CGTN's documentary on China's Xinjiang youtu.be/h2yMjbB1q24?t=174
    1
  15770.  @quanyuan6760  Taiwan has to fork out so much money for those pricey American fighters, whereas China manufacture our own tanks, missiles, fighters, warships, submarines, and other military equipment ourselves. China manufacture our very own 5th generation stealth fighter, the Chengdu J-20, and out of the entire world, only 3 countries have successfully flown full-size stealth combat aircraft demonstrations and they are United States (in 1977), Russia (in 2010) and China (in 2011). As of January 2020, the only combat-ready stealth aircraft in service are 3 from USA and 1 from China. Source: Stealth Aircraft wikipedia.org/wiki/Stealth_aircraft#Manned
    1
  15771.  @pointingoutpoints3661  Consider this question: Does Taiwan have a formal Declaration of Independence document? Who signed this document and when was it signed? Otherwise, if you refer to Taiwan's constitution then it clearly says that Taiwan is part of China under ROC's constitution. And did I denounce Taiwan's purchasing of US weapons? I merely said that Taiwan is paying money for American military equipment, whereas mainland China can manufacture our own weapons, tanks, missiles, etc"
    1
  15772.  @jklok  Changing the subject? The OP is about Taiwan using American weapons, yet you can change the topic by bringing up Uighur receiving education in Xinjiang? And the Uighur students are given the weekend off from school to be at home with their loved ones, and the school charters buses to take the Uighurs back to their home villages (which may be remote, especially in an area the size of Xinjiang) so what's your point then?
    1
  15773.  @pointingoutpoints3661  Taiwan's constitution was written in 1946 true, but till today there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, and ROC considers itself China, so Taiwan is part of China. And there's no formal Declaration of Independence document signed by Taiwan, so Taiwan is not an independent country. And you accused me of "denouncing the buying of any weapons from USA" in your post addressed to @Sound Mind. China manufacture our own tanks like the Type 99 Main Battle Tank which has commanded healthy respect from international observers, as its performance parameters are equal to many top Western designs (like the Russian T-90 and the US M1 Abrams), and the Type 99 also packs a few unique tricks of its own. Source: China's Deadly Type 99 Tank vs. Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/chinas-deadly-type-99-tank-vs-russias-t-90-americas-m-1-17836 China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank was even featured in our 70th anniversary National Day parade. Video: China's new generation main battlefield tanks revealed in National Day Parade youtu.be/Ec4Bu2orKTk
    1
  15774.  @czi125  The government rushed the construction of a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised, so what makes you think the government nothing about COVID-19? COVID-19 is still new to medical science and there currently exists no available cure so the only known way to recover is for the infected body to naturally develop antibodies to resist the virus and the doctors and nurses can't help you much there.
    1
  15775.  @w1z4rd9  Is there something wrong with my using vpn? And China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank has commanded healthy respect from international observers, as its performance parameters are equal to many top Western designs (like the Russian T-90 and the US M1 Abrams), and the Type 99 also packs a few unique tricks of its own. Source: China's Deadly Type 99 Tank vs. Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/chinas-deadly-type-99-tank-vs-russias-t-90-americas-m-1-17836 China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank was even featured in our 70th anniversary National Day parade. Video: China's new generation main battlefield tanks revealed in National Day Parade youtu.be/Ec4Bu2orKTk
    1
  15776.  @w1z4rd9  "神州 Shenzhou you are an idiot." Why resort to hurling personal insults against me for my views?
    1
  15777. @Francis China has hypersonic missiles like the DF-ZF, which have been tested 7 times already and travels at speeds between 4,000 and 7,000 miles per hour. Source: China Successfully Tests Hypersonic Missile freebeacon.com/national-security/china-successfully-tests-hypersonic-missile/ U.S. intelligence officials have assessed that China plans to use the glider to deliver nuclear weapons through increasingly sophisticated missile defenses. The DF-ZF also could be used as part of a conventional strategic strike weapon capable of hitting targets around the world within an hour.
    1
  15778.  @B3CUMaBRO  Isn't Taiwan part of China right now? Go and read Taiwan'a own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China under the One China policy. Did Taiwan wrote a formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it written? If not, then by default, Taiwan is part of China as written under their own constitution.
    1
  15779.  Nick Bennett  China's missiles cost a fraction the cost of Nimittz-class aircraft carrier so if our missiles can sunk it and its fighter fleet, then it's totall worth it.
    1
  15780.  @ivancheng9195  Why do you want to destroy the Communist Party of China? Because it has been very successful in governing China?
    1
  15781.  @Tekhelet75  Uighurs in Xinjiang are not 华人, that's a term reserved for overseas Chinese. But Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens (中国人) since Xinjiang is part of China, so why can't they receive a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (the national language of China) Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China? Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth and they learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America. Are you overseas Chinese yourself, since you use the term Chinese 华人 instead of Chinese national 中国人?
    1
  15782.  @Tekhelet75  You claim Taiwan is never not independent, then when is Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed the declaration and when was it signed? If not then according to Taiwan's constitution, Taiwan is part of China, since their constitution remains unchanged.
    1
  15783.  @waynemuldrow4066  Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese weapons and inventions?
    1
  15784.  @adamzz9908  You just contradicted yourself you know? First, you asked: "Uighurs are 中国人 so how are they treated differently from normal 汉族?" and next you said the Communist Party of China wants to make the next generation of Uighurs to think like Normal Chinese ethnic (汉族) so how are Uighurs treated differently from normal 汉族, you tell me? I mean, Mandarin Chinese (汉字) is the national language of China, so what's wrong teaching both 汉族 and Uighurs Mandarin Chinese? What's wrong with teaching Uighurs Chinese history, just like teaching 汉族 Chinese history? We are all Chinese nationals (中国人) after all! Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region was part of Han dynasty China (200 BC) even before Islam itself was born and the Uighurs weren't even originally Muslims in the first place and Uighurs had their own vibrant culture before the Islamic invaders conquered the region and converted the Uighurs to Islam. Just search online for pictures of "Uighurs girls" and see how beautiful they look garbed in their traditional Uighur costume. Why Islam wants cover up Uighur women's natural beauty with the ulgy, black, Muslim headveil? That's not the true Uighur culture. Who said that Uighurs aren't allowed to travel between cities? You lived in China for 6 years, then which part of our vast country did you visit? There are Uighurs living outside of Xinjiang. Beijing has a population of Uighur people. As of 2007, Beijing has both first generation Uighurs who arrived in Beijing and second generation Uighurs who perceive of themselves as Beijingers. Source: Uyghurs in Beijing wikipedia.org/wiki/Uyghurs_in_Beijing So why do you claim that Uighurs can't travel to other cities in China?
    1
  15785.  @adamzz9908  Why don't you correct your own contradiction, when you asked: "Uighurs are 中国人 so how are they treated differently from normal 汉族?" and next you said the Communist Party of China wants to make the next generation of Uighurs to think like Normal Chinese ethnic (汉族)? Normal Chinese learn Mandarin Chinese (the national language of China) at school and they learn Chinese history and since Uighurs born in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region are Chinese citizens by birth, then what's wrong teaching Uighurs Chinese? I've shown that Uighurs can be found in Beijing, who said that Uighur travel to other parts of China is restricted? And take a look at beautiful Uighur culture in Kashgar, Xinjiang. Video: New life for ancient city of Kashgar youtu.be/IrvaeJ5y8lI The ancient city of Kashgar is one of the most popular tourist destinations in China. In 2015, it officially became a national 5-A tourist attraction, the highest level granted by the government. Living conditions in Kashgar have also greatly improved over the past few years.
    1
  15786.  @ishwardevi134  United States copied German technologies after WWII. At the beginning of WWII, American tanks were largely inferior to German tanks, but after the German WWII surrender, Americans absorbed German Panzer (Tank) technology and that's why American tanks are so powerful today. The German Air Force (Luftwaffe) had such successful aircraft designs that the Americans copied them. Even German V2 Rocket Scientists were put to work on NASA Moon landing missions. Source: One of the greatest ripoffs of all time was the U.S theft of German patents after World War II 456fis.org/GREAT_PATENTS_HEIST.htm
    1
  15787.  @adamzz9908  Those Uighurs in re-education schools were potential terrorist recruits and thanks to the re-education program that they are returning back on the right path. Here's a look at vocational education and training programs in Xinjiang. Video: A look at vocational education and training programs in Xinjiang youtu.be/Hb4v7g6yM0Y Here's a look inside a high school in Xinjiang (by 安妮古丽) and how are the Uighurs in Xinjiang being oppressed? They are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese, Chinese history and so on. Video: 【安妮古麗】新疆的學校有啥不同？古麗畢業記錄最後的校園時光，你覺得咋樣？youtu.be/h3U-lKnMLwE
    1
  15788.  @serialcarpens290  Javelin missiles? China has inducted the world's first operational anti-ship ballistic missile, a "carrier killer" capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, known as the DF-21D. Video: China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile youtu.be/p-cEunmqXM8 The DF-21D is capable of targeting aircraft carrier strike groups out in the open ocean, from the safety of the land. The DF-21D is launched from land-based mobile launchers and flies high up into the stratosphere, using its advanced maneuverability to avoid interception by anti-missile defenses below, before falling at hypersonic speeds (above Mach 20) The warhead is even capable of terminal guidance, making last minute adjustments to its trajectory just seconds before impact.
    1
  15789.  @mrjean9376  America and Russia copied their weapons from Germany by theft of intellectual property after WWII. At the start of WWII, American tanks were largely inferior to German tanks, but after German WWII surrender, the Americans absorbed German Panzer (Tank) technology and that's why American tanks are so powerful today. The German Air force (Luftwaffe) had such successful designs that the Americans and Russians copied them. Even German V2 Rocket Scientists were put to work by NASA and Soviet Union during the space race. Source: One of the greatest ripoffs of all time was the theft of German patents after World War II 456fis.org/GREAT_PATENTS_HEIST.htm
    1
  15790.  @cooliipie  Why are you deliberately calling it by it's improper name, Chinese Virus, instead of its proper name, Covid-19? Look at all those attacks against Asian Americans (Asian Canadians, Asian Australians, Asian Europeans, etc) because American politicians like Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo choose to refer to the virus by it's improper name. Video: Asian Americans face discrimination in wake of the coronavirus youtu.be/t_IyTxRNUYk
    1
  15791.  Stop Cry  China paid Russia to purchase those technologies yes, so what's your point? Money is flowing out of China to Russia with each purchase.
    1
  15792.  @adamelam6385  The People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) is Asia's largest navy home to the world's largest number of submarines and still growing. We have 2 operational aircraft carriers with 2 more currently under construction in our shipyards.
    1
  15793.  @bigmedge  "神州 Shenzhou yea but most of the Chinese military hardware has been exposed as non-working" How? Here's China's People's Liberation Army military drill in Tibet Autonomous Region: youtu.be/IWXeET8V8T8 yet you're claiming most of Chinese military hardware isn't working?
    1
  15794.  @bigmedge  "神州 Shenzhou yea but like China’s electronics , most of their research papers are rip-offs of previously published work from other countries" Where's evidence of your claims? Here's the Top 20 Countries publish Scientific and technical journal articles From 2000 TO 2019 youtu.be/GtzYFoAldwA _Countries by Scientific and technical journal articles in 2020 1. China (720,147) 2. United States (481,210) 3. India (220,142) 4. Germany (177,747) 5. Italy (157,414) ...
    1
  15795.  @andrew_Gaming  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwan is NOT under China," Then why is it Taiwan hasn't formally declared independence? Why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations as an independent country? Is there something preventing Taiwan from joining the UN like an independent country can? You said: "Also why does Taiwan have its own president?" China is unique in that we allow multiple systems to exist within our borders under the One Country, Two Systems policy. For example, Hong Kong has their own Chief Executive, yet Hong Kong is part of China (after the 1997 handover)
    1
  15796.  @andrew_Gaming  "so technically the westerners are not using Chinese weapons and inventions but ancient chinas inventions." So they are using ancient Chinese inventions, then I'm glad that at least you agree with me on this point at least.
    1
  15797.  @francotiradorfilipino9057  "神州 Shenzhou What about chinas claim to the south china sea then," China had claimed the South China Sea islands back in 1947 when the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) published the 11 Dash Line. The People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 removed two dashes and that's how the 9 Dash Line came to be. Nobody objected to China's claims back then, even the Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng wrote a diplomatic letter to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, acknowledging that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese. Here is the letter:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg
    1
  15798. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15799. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  15800. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15801. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15802. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, if you read its constitution.
    1
  15803. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15804. What a strange coincidence that all you people all know the exact same guy! Something fishy is going on
    1
  15805.  @Joe-ul3gh  Read The Return of Industrial Warfare by Royal United Services Institute, it goes into detail how the West is unable to match Russia's industrial manufacturing capabilities.
    1
  15806. This reminds me of why Google left China because they lost majority market share to Baidu. While Google's market share climbed from 15% in mid-2006 to 31% in 2010, Baidu's shared increased its market share from 47% in mid-2006 to 64% in 2010, which is a significant lead. In the end, Google decided to withdraw from mainland China after losing majority market share to Baidu.
    1
  15807.  @zackk4393  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the USA is the one constantly lying about starting wars as well as a threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  15808.  @zackk4969  Our People's Liberation Army hasn't had any actual combat experience since our last conflict in 1979 for crying out loud. And if you want to talk about liars, then remember when former U.S President Bush invaded Iraq on suspicion of harbouring Weapons of Mass Destruction, but no WMDs were ever found in Iraq?
    1
  15809.  @themountain59  There are other newer surveys that indicate a similar level of optimism among Chinese about the future. For example, Ipsos Prediction Survey 2025 revealed that 87% of people in China surveyed are optimistic that 2025 will be a better year than it was in 2024.
    1
  15810.  @iloveporkandchicken4718  What do you mean late? You mean there is a time limit to commenting?
    1
  15811.  @ryanmeinecke8260  What shift are you talking about?
    1
  15812.  Jay  So when China teaches our kids Mandarin Chinese, Chinese characters, Chinese history and to sing patriotic songs about China, it is considered "reeducation?" Don't Americans also teach their kids English, American history, and to sing patriotic songs about America? Even the Native Americans? Isn't this "reeducation" as well?
    1
  15813.  Jay  China recently banned all meat exports from Canada, and the Canadian meat industries are already hurting bad. So are you sure you want the United States to just stop doing business all together with China? And the government does allow journalist to come to Uighur Schools (such as the report by BBC journalist John Sudworth) so who says that the government does not allow journalists into those schools?
    1
  15814.  Jay  Are you sure you don't snatch them from their homes and parents? The U.S. has deported more than half a million illegal immigrant parents from their kids since 2009. Source: The U.S. has deported more than half a million parents since 2009. washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/09/21/this-is-what-would-happen-to-the-children-of-11-million-illegal-immigrants-if-president-trump-deported-them/ At least in China, the kids are receiving a proper Chinese education and once they have graduated, they can be reunited with their parents. Whereas those US kids with deported parents will not be able to see their parents.
    1
  15815.  @Sputterish  Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth so what's wrong with teaching our citizens Mandarin Chinese, Chinese history and to sing patriotic songs about China? The Islamic invaders taught the Uighurs the glory of Islam, so why can't China teach our own citizens Chinese culture?
    1
  15816.  @lhakpabhuti1983  How is Chinese government real terrorist? China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Mozambique, Tanzania, Ghana, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, etc, even in the 21st century! The USA is bombing those countries (Iraq Body Count Project reported some 200,000 civilian casualties) and destroying families and property, leaving families broken, homeless, jobless and harbouring animosity against the USA, so with nothing more to lose, many of them flock to join the terrorist's cause. Can't you see who is the real terrorist government here?
    1
  15817.  @xxxzz8413  With the advent of the Internet, all this information is easily available online. Why accuse me of being 50 cents for citing sources?
    1
  15818.  @xxxzz8413  You are always welcome to attempt to refute my points with proof, since you claimed that there are counter studies. And it doesn't take much time to search for web links, it's just a simple search, so why do you think people have to be 50 cent to come up with this information? You say you don't have time, but here you are posting on YouTube. Why not attempt to refute my points instead of accusing me of being 50 cents then?
    1
  15819.  @editor4578  神州 Shenzhou so China is perfect then? Let's just check your objectivity... Let me ask does the current regime do anything wrong? Well, China's propaganda clearly sucks hard and urgently needs improvement. Many audiences refuse to believe Chinese media, even though they quote data and statistics. Whereas Western anti-China propaganda is very effective. Many audiences blindly believe Western anti-China MSM, even when it's unsubstantiated by proof.
    1
  15820.  @editor4578  "神州 Shenzhou so you don't even consider the possibility that she was coerced or forced to change her position?" There doesn't seem to be any evidence that she was coerced or forced to change her position. I read Peng Shuai's original post on Weibo, and while it's clear she has had a roller-coaster of a relation with a much older man, spanning several years, there was no allegations of sexual assault in her post. "And you simply saying that she wants to keep a low profile and is safe does not make it so." We've seen pictures of Peng Shuai attending small gatherings as well as appearing on video call with IOC, expressing her desire for personal privacy, so this evidence supports her behavior of keeping a low profile. "Why has she stopped communicating about her original grievances?" It's already embarrassing that her previous relation with a much older man has been revealed (it's considered shameful by traditional Chinese culture standards) so it's possible she's waiting for this whole thing to blow over and that's why she's laying low and expressing a desire for privacy. But the WTA won't let her have any of it, and they are trying to pry into her private affairs by demanding that she appear in public.
    1
  15821.  @charlesfavell3350  "神州 Shenzhou Bud he wasn't attacking China just the Genocidal CCP You know the government that abuses its own citizens" What genocide are you talking about? Isn't China the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people?
    1
  15822.  @charlesfavell3350  "神州 Shenzhou 2 Wumaos patting each other on the back for defending a CCP official who likes to rape young woman" Do you have evidence that Peng Shuai was raped? Then why are you already jumping to conclusions without proof? I thought Western law stipulated that a suspect is innocent until proven guilty, isn't it?
    1
  15823.  @charlesfavell3350  "Naw Shenzhou is probably just another useful tool (Wumao) for the CCP" Why don't you attempt to refute my points instead of labelling me a Wumao for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours? You already labelled 2 others as Wumao, just because we hold differing views, then maybe the problem lies with your inability to understand another point of view.
    1
  15824. @Arkangel Flights "神州 Shenzhou um the 26 women never disappeared lol. " Neither has Peng Shuai, we clearly have footage and photos of her attending small gatherings and appearing in a video call expressing her desire for privacy. But those 26 women complained to FBI who ignored their complaints for years.
    1
  15825. @Arkangel Flights "神州 Shenzhou um the Chinese government deleted her posts, kidnapped her, brainwashed her. It's possible that she herself deleted her posts. As for kidnapped her, where's your proof of kidnapping when Peng Shuai is resting at home and merely keeping a low profile after her previous affair with a much older man has been revealed?
    1
  15826. @Arkangel Flights "神州 Shenzhou yeah she said all those things right next to 6 other Chinese politicians. Plus we all know all China does is lie so this 99 percent a lie too." Who are those 6 other Chinese politicians? It is apparent that you're just anti-China that's all, when you claim all China does is lie.
    1
  15827.  @haguetroller8554  "神州 Shenzhou if she wasn't a tennis star her organ would have been harvested by CCP" You really believe those organ harvesting rumors? Which world leader like US President Biden, Russian President Putin, German Chancellor Merkel, Canadian PM Trudeu, French President Macron, Indian PM Modi, or other world leader have ever brought up allegations of organ harvesting to Chinese President Xi?
    1
  15828. @Arkangel Flights "神州 Shenzhou "clearly have photos" CCP trying to show she is fine but we all know it is a mask. She is forced to look okay and good when she really isn't." She's probably having a difficult time emotionally, after her previous affair with a much older man has been exposed, and I understand her desire to just lay low and avoid the public eye for some time, taking some time off to straighten up and get her affairs in order. But the WTA is behaving like the paparazzi and demanding that she appear in public to bare her private affairs, instead of respecting her wish for privacy.
    1
  15829.  @haguetroller8554  "神州 Shenzhou these has been proved by a Chinese citizens..." Which Chinese citizens? Why don't world leaders like US President Biden, Russian President Putin, German Chancellor Merkel, Canadian PM Trudeu, French President Macron, Indian PM Modi, or other world leader have ever brought up allegations of organ harvesting to Chinese President Xi?
    1
  15830.  @charlesfavell3350  "Don't bother arguing With Shenzhou...trying his best to manipulate facts while defending The CCP and the sexual abuse of a young woman" I'm also trying to find out the truth, do you have evidence of Peng Shuai being sexually abused? I read Peng Shuai's post on Weibo, and while she has had a tough time, there is no allegations of sexual assault, so where's the basis for your arguement to proceed?
    1
  15831.  @polynesianwarrior2166  Well said. I remember anti-China trolls were calling for "Where's Jack Ma?" and it turns out he was just laying low for a while, and he has resurfaced on a cruise in Balearic waters.
    1
  15832. @Arkangel Flights "神州 Shenzhou I don't who those 6 chinese politicians are. And I am not anti china, I am anti CCP. I don't have anything against chinese culture and the common people of china. I just hate the CCP dictatorship and its human rights abuses." China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  15833. @Arkangel Flights "I know you will say this guy is a "lying." But he himself has been to china and he shows actual evidence of CCP torments." laowhy86 has a history of lying to his audiences and I can prove it. Together with serpentza, laowhy86 both made a video claiming that the Dune movie posters in China excluded black actress Sharon Ducan-Brewster. But this has since been debunked and the Dune movie posters in China do feature Sharon in them. Video: youtu.be/5WsAEk7Dmk4 So the two of them lied to their audiences, then what makes you think they are trustworthy?
    1
  15834.  @bugsygoo  You said: "And I have already searched for Peng Shuai on the Chinese internet. I was blocked. Like everyone else." Chinese Internet? I just searched Peng Shuai (彭帅) on Baidu and Baidu returned around 10,500,000 relevant results (百度为您找到相关结果10,500,000个) so what do you mean you were blocked?
    1
  15835. @Arkangel Flights "神州 Shenzhou you have conflicts with 14 countries right now." China is currently at peace, which country is China currently at war with? None! China has settled boundary dispute approximately of 20,000 km with 12 countries out of the 22,000 km and is yet to settle about 2,000 km of boundary involving India and Bhutan. -In 1961, Nepal and China signed border agreement. -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1991, USSR and China signed Sino-Soviet border agreement. -In 1992, Laos and China signed border agreement. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border agreement. -In 2011, Tajikistan ratified a 1999 deal to cede 1,000 km2 of land to China and China also cede over 28,000 km2 of Tajikistani territory. China has 21 talks with Bhutan and 19 talks with India but still fail to settle our countries borders. Clearly, it's not from a lack of trying on China's part.
    1
  15836. @Arkangel Flights "神州 Shenzhou so are you telling me saddam Hussein and Muammar were great people?" Under Muammar Gaddafi, Libya was arguably Africa's Most Prosperous Democracy. Everyone is involved in every decisions. Tens of thousands of people take part in local committee meetings to discuss issues and vote on everything from foreign treaties to building schools, according to the New York Times. Gaddafi proposed the creation of a gold-backed African currency (the Gold Dinar) that would unite African economies, and free Africa from the oppression of the U.S dollar. But the U.S would have none of this, so that's why the USA invaded Libyan and assassinated Gaddafi, and now Libya is a ruin of what it formerly was, and slave traders openly sell slaves in Libya's market.
    1
  15837. @Arkangel Flights You said: "You have shown no respect to your soldiers when 40 of then died at Galwan valley, you guys simply rejected any were killed." China never said no one was killed at Galwan Valley, the government simply did not release figures of death tolls on the Chinese side. I mean, what's the point of releasing the death toll? Look at Indian media, they said 20 Indian soldiers died at Galwan Valley (they succumbed to the high attitudes and freezing temperatures at Ladakh) and the Indian people were in an uproar, trashing and burning Chinese goods on protest as anti-China sentiment rose in India. This is dangerous and could possibly escalate into outright war at our border. What the Chinese government wants is de-escalation of conflict so they censor news about any People's Liberation Army soldiers perishing at Galwan Valley. Can you imagine the uproar by Chinese people if more people knew that possibly 40 PLA soldiers? Anti-Indian sentiment would grow in China, possibly worst than the anti-China sentiment in India, then why should China release the death toll figures, you tell me? It's actually thanks to Chinese censorship over Galwan Valley, that anti-Indian sentiment is not so widespread in China. But the death toll of Indian soldiers spurred anti-China sentiment in India, so you can see the disadvantage of free media in India.
    1
  15838. @Arkangel Flights You said: "You invaded Tibet through some stupid claim too." Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Tibet broke free of China in 1913 but wasn't recognised as an independent country and it was reincorporated back into China by 1951, so is the claim stupid in your view?
    1
  15839. @Arkangel Flights "神州 Shenzhou Wait so you are saying free media is bad???" In a sense yes. Because Indian media is unregulated, the Indian media is stoking Indian nationalism by martyring the deaths of Indian soldiers, and this resulted in Indians trashing Chinese products and increased anti-China sentiment, resulting in escalation of tensions at the border, possibly leading to open conflict (which would not be in both our country's interest. Whereas in China's regulated media, since the death toll is not released, many Chinese do not harbor anti-Indian sentiment, so this results in de-escalation of tension at the border, so isn't Chinese censorship beneficial in this regard? " So to protect China's image it is better to make sure that the families, the people of china, have no idea about the soldiers who sacrificed for their countries." The PLA soldier's families and relative can hold their own private funerals, but like I asked earlier: What's the point of releasing death toll figures? Perhaps a some time later, when the Sino-Indian tensions have cooled, then death toll figures could be released to the public, but as of right now, what's the purpose of releasing those figures publicly? That would only stir up anti-Indian sentiment among Chinese (like what's happening in India with anti-China sentiment) then how would this be beneficial to our countries? "And Indians have every right to trash chinese products and boycott your goods." Well, technically they can destroy Chinese goods that they already paid for and it's their choice to boycott Chinese goods. But what concerns me is the rising anti-China sentiment in India, possibly targeting Chinese citizens (or people who look Chinese) in India. This is the problem with stirring up anti-China sentiment in other countries. "You guys have time and time tried to invade them." Actually, even Indian PM Modi has publicly said that "Chinese troops did not enter Indian territory and no posts were taken" so what invasion are you talking about? Video: No One Entered Indian Territory: PM Narendra Modi's Big Message To China Over LAC Standoff youtu.be/5xlQwO8tWmM
    1
  15840. @Arkangel Flights "神州 Shenzhou can u prove his other videos to be a lie though?" laowhy86 has also lied about Xinjiang Tik Tok (Douyin) videos having a "secret code" using emojis and dates. However, if you search up the original video ID of those Xinjiang Tik Tok videos, there were no emojis on the video, and were possibly digitally added into laowhy86's videos. Video: The most ridiculous evidence of genocide in Xinjiang youtu.be/hLNJaODz8Ak
    1
  15841. @Arkangel Flights You said: "I applaud India for taking in Dalai Lama when China gruesomly invaded Tibet claiming it as their own." Did you know that the 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and a traitor to his people? The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government (Beijing). Declassified CIA files have exposed that a total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) Source: CIA Tibetan program So here we have concrete evidence that the 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the USA to engage in separatist activities against the Central People's Government.
    1
  15842. @Arkangel Flights "神州 Shenzhou Um, but don't you think Indian media will obviously trash china if their soldiers were killed?" That's why I agree earlier that "Free media is bad" it allows the Indian media to hype up Indian nationalism against China. Look at Chinese censorship and there's virtually no anti-Indian sentiment (even though 40 PLA soldiers were allegedly killed) so I've demonstrated the benefits of having a regulated media in China and the disadvantage of an unregulated media in India. "PM Modi said that to calm the nerves of his people and the chinese invasion was a failure because 40 chinese troops were killed. But it was still a invasion from china." Firstly, it didn't really calm the Indians, because anti-China sentiment is still rampant among many Indians. And secondly, since PLA troops did not enter Indian territory, what Chinese invasion are you talking about? Where's your proof that Chinese troops entered Indian territory? Even PM Modi clearly said that China didn't enter Indian territory. ‘China didn’t enter our territory…’: PM Modi at all-party meet on Ladakh clash youtu.be/eLlkDGaz6gU
    1
  15843. @Arkangel Flights "神州 Shenzhou Yeah I know that. And it makes sense. He knew that china wanted to invade his country and he did everything in his power to stop it. But he failed. I don't blame him for that. Good evidence but it really doesn't prove any point." Firstly, Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, *acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging that Tibet is part of China. Secondly, the 14th Dalai Lama accepted CIA money to engage in separatist activities against the central government, and this is in violation of UN Charter that countries mustn't interfere in another countries politics. How does this not prove any point?
    1
  15844. @Arkangel Flights Did you see my video about laowhy86 lying about "secret codes" through emojis in Uighur Tiktok (Douyin) videos? Here's another video debunking his lies: Video: RE: Secret coded videos - Xinjiang Emoji videos debunked - Emojigate - Arslan Hidayat - Laowhy86 youtu.be/qC3Vk4-MKQI
    1
  15845.  @HavokMakerX  Nobody will come arrest you just for logging into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    1
  15846.  @HavokMakerX  Horrific regime? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  15847.  Bart  "神州 Shenzhou many..." Many what?
    1
  15848.  @joeidaho5938  Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-corruption crackdowns to deal with corruption. But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign. But after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    1
  15849. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15850. Even the United States of America acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15851. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15852. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  15853. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  15854. 轮子只靠黑中国吃饭。
    1
  15855. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15856. Chinese workers come to African countries like Nigeria, Angola, Kenya, etc, to help build roads, railways, highways, infrastructure, schools, hotels, hospitals, shopping centers, football stadiums, telecommunication projects, to make African society better. China has done much in Africa in decades, compared to what Westerners did in Africa for centuries.
    1
  15857.  @stopwarstop7334  Chinese fighter jets flew in international airspace in fact if you trace the flight path, the People's Liberation Army Airforce fighters flew closer to mainland China than Taiwan island.
    1
  15858.  @venonymous254  If you want to talk about prison, then it's America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets in order to ease the overcrowded situation of it's prisons.
    1
  15859.  @venonymous254  What Uighur genocide? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2020 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 11 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 ... So what genocide are you talking about when the population of Uighurs in China has actually grown over the years?
    1
  15860.  @SuperJustice47  That would be falling into the same trap that is currently affecting Iran through those foreign sponsored protestors.
    1
  15861. Before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was British Colony, and the 1956 HK riots resulted in 59 deaths while the 1967 HK riots resulted in 51 deaths, all while under British colonial rule. Yet after the handover back to mainland China, today's 2019 HK riots resulted in zero deaths thus far, so aren't the HK police showing incredible restraint? Despite facing severe stress everyday, mental and physical fatigue after months of protests, and public humiliation by the crowds?
    1
  15862.  @alexmonroe1027  As far as I know, China issued neutral statements to Russian military intervention in Geogia and Crimea. The Chinese government did not defend nor attack Russia for its intervention.
    1
  15863. @HKZ P How is that being "hypocritical"? Chinese government never welcomed dissidents, so how is it hypocritical to imprison them if they break the law? In my experience, dissidents are loudmouths who only know how to criticise policies, but offer no solution of their own. They spread resentment or cause panic and social unrest.
    1
  15864. @HKZ P You mean Trump is going to wait until all the evidence was in? The CIA already released footage of the Saudi Arabian Crown Prince's involvement in murder of journalist. And then why hasn't USA released information about Huawei CFO Meng's alleged "crimes" before issuing the warrant for Canada to detain her? Where is the proof of her crimes?
    1
  15865. @HKZ P You also said PRC is murdering dissidents? Then can you show proof of murder? Because earlier you said they were just imprisoned that's all.
    1
  15866.  @qtkingdom5527  Under Chinese laws, it was legal to harvest organs from prisoners sentenced to death only with the prior permission of the criminal or the family. At least the healthy organs will be used to save someone's else's life, instead of being wasted and buried with the body, rotting away under the earth.
    1
  15867.  @qtkingdom5527  I never said that the poor are getting those organs, I said that at least the healthy organs will be used to save someone's else's life. Otherwise what? The criminal will still be executed, and if the healthy organs aren't harvested, it will be wasted and rotting away under the earth. Who is the one not being realistic here?
    1
  15868. Exactly, China respects Ukraine's sovereignty as well as Russia's security concerns about Nato's eastward expansion. Putin has welcomed China's peace proposals, but the United States rejects this peace plan.
    1
  15869.  @Bilangumus  In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, reining in companies when they gone too far. Whereas in the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    1
  15870.  @basiazm  It's true. I suggest watching Oliver Stone's 2016 documentary Ukraine On Fire to learn how the seeds of fascism were planted in Ukraine by Nazi Germany. There's other recommended video materials like Why is Ukraine the West's Fault? Featuring John Mearsheimer by the University of Chicago and Vladimir Pozner: How the United States Created Vladimir Putin by YaleUniversity, if you want to learn about the history of Russo-Ukraine relations.
    1
  15871. China has learnt from the West that social media is out of control there (as agreed upon by Piers Morgan)
    1
  15872.  @vitaliibraslavets  About the South China Sea, the North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    1
  15873.  @vitaliibraslavets  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  15874. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15875.  @alexk5483  When Hong Kong was still a British colony, there was no democracy, and no elections were ever held by Hong Kong people while under British rule. It's only during the period of Hong Kong handover to mainland China, did the people of Hong Kong finally get to vote for the first time. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that people in Hong Kong can finally vote in elections?
    1
  15876.  @paperclip3908  The thing is, Hong Kong flourished under authoritarian British rule previously, and its only after the Hong Kong handover to mainland China, when people of Hong Kong get to vote for the first time, did Hong Kong's economy began to suffer.
    1
  15877.  @Junqfan  The Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam was voted for into power after winning the 2017 election garnering over 700 out of the 1200 member Election Committee (which consists entirely of Hong Kong groups) and is appointed by the Central Government. So isn't HK a democracy since their leaders are voted in by Hong Kong people?
    1
  15878. @J Doe What makes you think Chinese people are cloistered? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, every country in the world has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting their lands and stimulating their economies. Your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with international exchange students from China, studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese business and firms are growing more powerful (Huawei, Lenovo, Xiaomi, Oppo, ZTE, etc) and Chinese investors are buying up property and real estate in other countries. So why you think Chinese people are cloistered then? We make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  15879. @J Doe More than any country, China has the world's most outbound tourists, which is why more and more countries are catering to Chinese tourists, offering tours in Mandarin, etc, to cash in on Chinese tourists. Even in education, your Western schools and universities are flooded with Chinese students, and many Chinese students compete with your local students for university spots, in examinations and also for jobs when they graduate. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 So what makes you think Chinese people are oppressed like you claim? Even in the Internet, Chinese language is the 2nd most common language in the Internet, only behind English at number one, so why you claim that Chinese people can't discuss things on the Internet? There are so many Chinese websites and forums where Chinese discuss issues so why you claim Chinese can't discuss issues on the Internet? Source: Top Ten Internet Languages (Chinese is 2nd) internetworldstats.com/stats7.htm Seriously, have you even stepped out onto the street (wherever you live) and grab a Chinese person in your area and talked to them? Why you think Chinese people are oppressed then?
    1
  15880. @J Doe So your business partner friend cried when President Xi became as powerful as Mao. But he is just one person and that was his/her view that's all. And how would you know many in China feel the same? Have you been to China yourself and ask many Chinese yourself? Then how would you know?
    1
  15881. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  15882.  @CJ-Fortes_Atque_Fidelis  The thing is, China didn't bomb Xinjiang into smithereens, instead the government choose re-education, and Uighurs that were at risk of radicalism were sent to vocational training schools to pick up a job skill so that they can graduate and contribute back to society. This is clearly different from the path taken by the IDF.
    1
  15883.  @CJ-Fortes_Atque_Fidelis  China sent those fanatics to re education centers and vocational training camps to pick up a job skill. so that they can graduate and contribute back to society. This is clearly different from the path taken by the IDF.
    1
  15884.  @Betty-bj1ur  "as they should Chinese bot." So you support the continued bombing of hospitals, refugee camps, UN schools in Gaza with weapons from the United States?
    1
  15885. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  15886.  @dallasreid2781  没解决?你最近有来过新疆吗？
    1
  15887.  @Joeyknows924  Where did you get your figures for 1.2 million Tibetans dying? The population of Tibetans in China has grown over the years, from 2.7 million Tibetans in 1953 to 7 million Tibetans in the 2020 consensus. Have you been to the Tibetan Autonomous Region and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  15888.  @Joeyknows924  The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. It was signed by plenipotentiaries of the Central People's Government and the Tibetan government on 23 May 1951, in Zhongnanhai, Beijing. The 14th Dalai Lama ratified the agreement in the form of a telegraph on 24 October 1951.
    1
  15889.  @opakular  You said: "Uyghurs are not happy, successful or thriving... and denied the right to freely practice their religion and express their culture." Are you serious? In Xinjiang, the Uighurs celebrate their culture by dressing up in their Uighur ethnic clothing (i.e the chapan and the doppa) while serving up Uighur cuisine such as naan (Uighur flatbread), pilaf rice, and mutton kebabs (skewers). If you visit the Grand Bazaar in Xinjiang, you can find many Uighurs singing and dancing while playing traditional Uighur instruments such as the Dutar lute. How is that denying Uighurs the right to practice their religion and express their culture? Have you actually been to Xinjiang and seen what life is like there for Uighurs yourself?
    1
  15890. Taiwan is selling their trump card (TMSC) off to the United States, after which Taiwan would not longer have any worth to risk U.S troops losing their lives over.
    1
  15891.  @hugok3340  Take smartphones for example, and mainland China has produced many successful smartphone companies like _Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Oppo, Realme, and so on. Here's a List of Top Ten Smartphone Brands in 2021 1. Samsung (South Korean) 2. Huawei (Chinese) 3. Apple (American) 4. Oppo (Chinese) 5. Vivo (Chinese) 6. Xiaomi (Chinese) 7. LG (South Korean) 8. Lenovo (Chinese) 9. ZTE (Chinese) 10. Alcatel-Lucent (Chinese, formerly French) ... But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  15892.  @hugok3340  Besides smartphones, Chinese companies also dominate the civilian drone industry and Chinese company DJI is world's largest civilian drone-maker according to the following source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019
    1
  15893.  @hugok3340  Using a per capita basis is unfair, because China has the world's largest population at 1.4 billion people. So if you divide our GDP by our enormous population, then of course you'll arrive at a GDP per capita that's smaller than Taiwan Island, with their smaller population. Whereas if you compare China's GDP per capita with that of India's (i.e the world's 2nd most populous country after China), then China's GDP per capita is ten times bigger than that of India's
    1
  15894. 说实话翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见
    1
  15895. About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can theoretically produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starvation, homelessness, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs.
    1
  15896. @Ben Benito Americans can put their presidents on their paper currency, then can't China do the same with Mao Zedong? Chairman Mao is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country, where the previous Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) failed under the Nationalist Kuomintang administration.
    1
  15897.  @TPELaoY  You said: "Pleeeease save me the ancient Chinese wisdom lecture. China’s economy is faltering." Here's what western magazines have been saying about China since 1990: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  15898.  @TPELaoY  You said: "Pleeeease save me the ancient Chinese wisdom lecture. China’s economy is faltering." Here's what western magazines have been saying about China since 1990: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  15899.  @TPELaoY  "Pleeeease save me the ancient Chinese wisdom lecture. China’s economy is faltering." You rather trust what western journals been saying about China's economy since 1990? 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  15900.  @halholland1637  "Piss-off the rest world? Good plan!" That's precisely what the US plan is towards the Global South, i.e the global majority.
    1
  15901.  @KhanhNguyen-hi7sw  There are only hundreds of thousands of protestors in Hong Kong, not a million people protesting. Why are you purposely exaggerating the figures of the protestors?
    1
  15902.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "Firstly, the Qing government was Manchu not Chinese. You dont see a French calling himself a Roman or claiming Roman territory do you. What a joke." After conquering China proper, the Manchus identified their state as "China", equivalently as Zhōngguó (中國; 'middle kingdom') in Chinese and Dulimbai Gurun in Manchu. The emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including, among other areas, present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, and Tibet) as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that only Han areas were properly part of "China". The government used "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their state in official documents, including the Chinese-language versions of treaties and maps of the world. Source: Wikipedia: Qing Dynasty So how was the Qing government not Chinese? They literally identified their state as China, as Zhongguo the Middle Kingdom. Both China and Qing were used interchangeably in their official documents, treaties and maps of the world.
    1
  15903.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "Firstly, the Qing government was Manchu not Chinese. You dont see a French calling himself a Roman or claiming Roman territory do you. What a joke." After conquering China proper, the Manchus identified their state as "China", equivalently as Zhōngguó (中國; 'middle kingdom') in Chinese and Dulimbai Gurun in Manchu. The emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including, among other areas, present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, and Tibet) as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that only Han areas were properly part of "China". The government used "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their state in official documents, including the Chinese-language versions of treaties and maps of the world. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Qing_dynasty#Names So how was the Qing government not Chinese? They literally identified their state as China, as Zhongguo the Middle Kingdom. Both China and Qing were used interchangeably in their official documents, treaties and maps of the world.
    1
  15904.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "1: The island now known as Taiwan was inhabited and ruled by the aborigines for approximately 30,000 years." But today the island now known as Taiwan is inhabited by Chinese, and their government's constitution clearly acknowledges that Taiwan is part of China. Similar to how Australian aborigines and Native Americans once ruled Australia and America, but today they no longer rule themselves. "2: When the Dutch arrived in 1626 most of the population of Formosa were the Yuanzhumin or Gaoshan people (who have no DNA link back to China)" According to Huang et. al (2022), Austronesian speakers in Taiwan, such as Ami and Atayal, derive their ancestries from a Late Neolithic Fujianese source (66.9–74.3%). Liu et. al (2023) stated that the ancestors of Taiwanese Austronesians originated from the southeastern coasts of Neolithic China. So apparently, there is some DNA link back to China for Taiwanese arboriginals.
    1
  15905.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  Taken directly from the US Department of State website: The U.S. and Taiwan enjoy a robust unofficial relationship. The 1979 U.S.-P.R.C. Joint Communique switched diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing. In the Joint Communique, the U.S. recognized the Government of the People’s Republic of China as the sole legal government of China, acknowledging the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  15906.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "China has never controlled Singapore or Formosa so yes they are the same." They are not the same because while Singapore was never historically part of China, Taiwan was indeed historically part of China. It was part of Qing Dynasty China (even if you claimed only 20%) and later you stated that the ROC (i.e Republic of China) fully controlled Taiwan, so how can you claim China has never controlled Taiwan?
    1
  15907.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "The Manchu government controlled about 20% of the island but they were not Chinese." Look up Qing Dynasty. After conquering China proper, the Manchu government literally identified their state as China, calling it Zhongguo (i.e The Middle Kingdom) and the Manchu emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including, among other areas, present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, and Tibet) as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages. Look, even the Manchu government used both "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their state in their maps and official documents, so how on earth were the Manchu government not Chinese? You said: "Like I already said, you do not see the French trying to claim Roman achievement although they were once Roman. Think about it." What has French or Roman even got to do with this at all? Look, even today in China the Manchu minorities identify themselves as Chinese citizens, so why are you imposing your Western thinking of French and Roman onto Eastern thinking of Manchu and Chinese?
    1
  15908.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "Japan was the first foreign country to take full control of Taiwan." After Japanese surrender at the end of WWII, Japan relinquished its occupation over all previously occupied territory, and now the ROC (i.e Republic of China) is in control over Taiwan. You said: "The Manchu were not ethnically Chinese but this point is irrelevant as Japan were the first to conquer Taiwan." The Manchu government identified China as as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that only Han areas were properly part of "China". Isn't that the same with America having different races such as African Americans, Anglo-Saxon Americans, Asian Americans, Native Americans, yet they are all regarded as Americans? And even if you claim Japan were the first to conquer Taiwan, the fact remains that Japan has relinquished their control after their WWII surrender, and that the Republic of China (ROC) is in control of the island today. And ROC's constitution claims that they are China, and that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  15909.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "The Manchu government... were not Chinese." Look up Qing Dynasty. After conquering China proper, the Manchu government literally identified their state as China, calling it Zhongguo (i.e The Middle Kingdom) and the Manchu government used both "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their state in their maps and official documents, so how on earth were the Manchu government not Chinese? You said: "Like I already said, you do not see the French trying to claim Roman achievement although they were once Roman. Think about it." What has French or Roman even got to do with this at all? Look, even today in China the Manchu minorities identify themselves as Chinese citizens, so why are you imposing your Western thinking of French and Roman onto Eastern thinking of Manchu and Chinese?
    1
  15910.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "The Manchu government controlled about 20% of the island but they were not Chinese." After conquering China proper, the Manchus identified their state as "China", equivalently as Zhōngguó (中國; 'middle kingdom') in Chinese. The Manchu government used "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their state in official documents, including the Chinese-language versions of treaties and maps of the world. So how was the Manchu government not Chinese? You said: "Like I already said, you do not see the French trying to claim Roman achievement although they were once Roman. Think about it." What has French or Roman even got to do with this at all? Look, even today in China the Manchu minorities identify themselves as Chinese citizens, so what's your point in bringing up the French or Roman? You're just comparing apples to oranges here that's all.
    1
  15911.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  After conquering China proper, the Manchus identified their state as "China", equivalently as Zhōngguó (中國; 'middle kingdom') in Chinese. The Manchu government used "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their state in official documents, including the Chinese-language versions of treaties and maps of the world. So how was the Manchu government not Chinese? You said: "Like I already said, you do not see the French trying to claim Roman achievement although they were once Roman. Think about it." What has French or Roman even got to do with this at all? Look, even today in China the Manchu minorities identify themselves as Chinese citizens, so what's your point in bringing up the French or Roman? You're just comparing apples to oranges here that's all.
    1
  15912.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "The Manchu government controlled about 20% of the island but they were not Chinese." The Manchu government identified their state as "China", i.e Zhōngguó the Middle Kingdom, how were they not Chinese? The Manchu government even used "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their state in official documents, including the Chinese-language versions of treaties and maps of the world. So how was the Manchu government not Chinese? You said: "Like I already said, you do not see the French trying to claim Roman achievement although they were once Roman. Think about it." What has French or Roman even got to do with this at all? Look, even today in China the Manchu minorities identify themselves as Chinese citizens, so what's your point in bringing up the French or Roman?
    1
  15913.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  The Manchu government *identified their state as "China", as Zhongguo the Middle Kingdom, so how were they not Chinese? The Manchu government even used "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their state in official documents. So how was the Manchu government not Chinese? You said: "Like I already said, you do not see the French trying to claim Roman achievement although they were once Roman. Think about it." What has French or Roman even got to do with this at all? Today, the Manchu people regard themselves as Chinese citizens, so what's your point?
    1
  15914.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "The Manchu government controlled about 20% of the island but they were not Chinese." The Manchu government literally called their state "China" as in ZhongGuo, i.e The Middle Kingdom, so how are they not Chinese? The Manchu government used both "China" and "Qing" interchangeably in their official documents, so how is Manchu government not Chinese? You said: "Like I already said, you do not see the French trying to claim Roman achievement although they were once Roman. Think about it." What has French or Roman even got to do with this at all?
    1
  15915.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "The Manchu government controlled about 20% of the island but they were not Chinese." The Manchu government literally called their state "China" as in ZhongGuo, i.e The Middle Kingdom, so how are they not Chinese? The Manchu government used both "China" and "Qing" interchangeably in their official documents, so how is Manchu government not Chinese?
    1
  15916.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  The Manchu government literally called their state "China" as in ZhongGuo, i.e The Middle Kingdom, so how are they not Chinese? The Manchu government used both "China" and "Qing" interchangeably in their official documents, so how is Manchu government not Chinese? You said: "Like I already said, you do not see the French trying to claim Roman achievement although they were once Roman. Think about it." What has French or Roman even got to do with this at all?
    1
  15917.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  The Manchu government identified their state "China" as in ZhongGuo, i.e The Middle Kingdom, so how are they not Chinese? The Manchu government used both "China" and "Qing" interchangeably in their official documents, so how is Manchu government not Chinese?
    1
  15918.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  I've already stated earlier how the Manchu government identified their state as "China", using both "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their official documents, so how are they not Chinese? The Manchu even rejected the idea of a Han-only China, and defined China as a multi-ethinic state, so it doesn't matter if China is ruled by Han or by Manchu, it is still China regardless. And what has the French and Roman even got to do with China? You're just comparing apples to oranges that's all with such a claim.
    1
  15919.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  I've already stated earlier how the Manchu government identified their state as "China", using both "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their official documents, so how are they not Chinese? The Manchu even rejected the idea of a Han-only China, and defined China as a multi-ethinic state, so it doesn't matter if China is ruled by Han or by Manchu, it is still China regardless.
    1
  15920.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "Like I already said, you do not see the French trying to claim Roman achievement although they were once Roman. Think about it." What has French or Roman even got to do with this at all? Just because the French think like that, doesn't mean others think the same. For example, today in China, the Manchu identify themselves as Chinese citizens. You said: "Japan was the first foreign country to take full control of Taiwan." Even if you claim that, they weren't the last to rule the island. After Japanese surrender, Japan has relinquished control over all its formerly occupied territory, and today the island is under the ROC (i.e Republic of China) government, of which under their constitution, they claim that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  15921.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "Like I already said, you do not see the French trying to claim Roman achievement although they were once Roman. Think about it." What has French or Roman even got to do with this at all? Just because the French think like that, doesn't mean others think the same. For example, today in China, the Manchu consider themselves as Chinese citizens, so what's your point?
    1
  15922.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  According to The Diplomat: Shanghai Communique: An American Foreign Policy On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia. The Vietnam War was still raging when the Communique was signed but there has been no major war in the Asia-Pacific since that time. The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position. Source: The Diplomat: Shanghai Communique: An American Foreign Policy Since US doesn't challenge that position, it means the US accepts China's position that Taiwan is a part of China.
    1
  15923.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "Japan was the first foreign country to take full control of Taiwan." Even if you claim that, they weren't the last to rule the island. After Japanese surrender, Japan has relinquished control over all its formerly occupied territory, and today the island is under the ROC (i.e Republic of China) government, of which under their constitution, they claim that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  15924.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  Look up Wikipedia: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) The UN interpretation is: On 21 September 2007, the UN General Assembly rejected Taiwan's membership bid to "join the UN under the name of Taiwan", citing Resolution 2758 as acknowledging that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  15925.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "China has never controlled Singapore or Formosa so yes they are the same." Again they aren't the same, because Singapore was never historically part of China. Whereas Taiwan is historically part of China, during Qing Dynasty (of whom the Manchu government used "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their state in their official documents) and also later when the ROC (i.e Republic of China) rules the island even till today, after the Japanese WWII surrender in which Japan relinquished control over all their formerly occupied territory.
    1
  15926.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "The fact is that there are no internationally treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China." In the 1972 Joint Communique with the PRC, the United States "acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China" and "does not challenge that position." Therefore, it's not just People's Republic of China's (PRC) position, it is also the position of the Republic of China (ROC). And to top it off, in the communique the US doesn't challenge that position (either PRC's or ROC's) so they don't oppose the position that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  15927.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  According to the Wiki page on United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) Under the section Interpretations, Under United Nations, On 21 September 2007, the UN General Assembly rejected Taiwan's membership bid to "join the UN under the name of Taiwan", citing Resolution 2758 as acknowledging that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  15928.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  According to the Wiki: UN Resolution 2758 (XXVI) On 21 September 2007, the UN General Assembly rejected Taiwan's membership bid to "join the UN under the name of Taiwan", citing Resolution 2758 as acknowledging that Taiwan is part of China. That's why Taiwan is unable to join to the United Nations, because of Resolution 2758 acknowledging that Taiwan is part of China, and that China's seat in the UN Security Council is taken by the People's Republic of China.
    1
  15929.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "Like I already said, you do not see the French trying to claim Roman achievement although they were once Roman. Think about it." What's there to think about? Just because the French don't try to claim Roman achievement doesn't mean that the same thing applies to China. As I've stated earlier, the Manchu government itself uses both "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their state in official documents, so what's the point in bringing up the French?
    1
  15930.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "We are in 2024 not 1972 my friend. lol" Previously you brought up Qing Dynasty from 1750, and Taiwan aborigines from 30,000 years ago to support your point, now you're talking about the present and ignoring what came before? You said: "There are no internationally treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China. Evidence below: "The Government of the United States of America acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China."" But as you clearly quoted , it is clearly stated that Taiwan is part of China. So how can you claim that there are no internationally treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China? It's stated there clearly.
    1
  15931.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "There are no internationally treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China" Here's one according to the UN's Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties, Handbook ... _regarding the Taiwan Province of China, the Secretary-General follows the General Assembly’s guidance incorporated in resolution 2758 (XXVI) of the General Assembly of 25 October 1971 on the restoration of the lawful rights of the People’s Republic of China in the United Nations. The General Assembly decided to recognize the representatives of the Government of the People’s Republic of China as the only legitimate representatives of China to the United Nations. Hence, instruments received from the Taiwan Province of China will not be accepted by the Secretary-General in his capacity as depositary._ ... Source: Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties Handbook (published by UN).
    1
  15932.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "There are no internationally treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China" Here's one according to the UN's Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties, Handbook ... regarding the Taiwan Province of China, the Secretary-General follows the General Assembly’s guidance incorporated in resolution 2758 (XXVI) of the General Assembly of 25 October 1971 on the restoration of the lawful rights of the People’s Republic of China in the United Nations.... Hence, instruments received from the Taiwan Province of China will not be accepted by the Secretary-General in his capacity as depositary. ... Source: Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties Handbook (published by UN).
    1
  15933.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "There are no internationally treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China" Taiwan is defined as a province of China as stated in the UN's Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties Handbook regarding the Taiwan Province of China, the Secretary-General follows the General Assembly’s guidance incorporated in resolution 2758 (XXVI) of the General Assembly of 25 October 1971 on the restoration of the lawful rights of the People’s Republic of China in the United Nations.... Hence, instruments received from the Taiwan Province of China will not be accepted by the Secretary-General in his capacity as depositary. ... Source: Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties Handbook (published by UN).
    1
  15934.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "There are no internationally treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China" Taiwan is defined as a province of China as stated in the UN's Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties Handbook ... -regarding the Taiwan Province of China, the Secretary-General follows the General Assembly’s guidance incorporated... -Hence, instruments received from the Taiwan Province of China will not be accepted by the Secretary-General in his capacity as depositary. ... Source: Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties Handbook (published by UN).
    1
  15935.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  "Shenzhou. A handbook means nothing." The Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties Handbook was published by the United Nations, how does that mean nothing? And Taiwan is defined as a province of China as stated in that handbook. ... -regarding the Taiwan Province of China, the Secretary-General follows the General Assembly’s guidance incorporated... -Hence, instruments received from the Taiwan Province of China will not be accepted by the Secretary-General in his capacity as depositary. ... Source: Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties Handbook (published by UN).
    1
  15936.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "There are no internationally recognized treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China and you have failed to prove otherwise." Look, you wrote "that state Taiwan is part of China." So that means the words "Taiwan is part of China" has to be stated in the document right? And clearly, those exact words are stated in the US/PRC One China Policy and you've admitted to it several times already. You wrote: "The Government of the United States of America acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China." So clearly, the words "Taiwan is part of China" is stated in that document.
    1
  15937.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "There are no internationally treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China." You've said that so many times, yet it's clear that the words "Taiwan is part of China" are stated in the 1982 US/PRC One China Policy. You wrote: "The Government of the United States of America acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China." and it's clear that the words "Taiwan is part of China" are stated in the document you quoted.
    1
  15938. ​ @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "The fact is that there are no internationally treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China" The words "Taiwan is part of China" are clearly stated in the 1982 US/PRC One China Policy. You wrote: "The Government of the United States of America acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China." and it's apparent that the words "Taiwan is part of China" have been stated in the document you quoted.
    1
  15939.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "The fact is that there are no internationally treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China" The words "Taiwan is part of China" are clearly stated in the 1982 US/PRC One China Policy. Look, you wrote: "The Government of the United States of America acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China." and it's apparent that the words "Taiwan is part of China" have been stated in the document you quoted.
    1
  15940.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  The handbook represents long-standing UN convention regarding Resolution 2758 that Taiwan is part of China. Even UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was following UN standard protocol when he stated: "The position of the United Nations is that the People's Republic of China is representing the whole of China as the sole and legitimate representative Government of China... The resolution (General Assembly Resolution 2758) that you just mentioned is clearly mentioning that the Government of China is the sole and legitimate Government and the position of the United Nations is that Taiwan is part of China." — UN General Secretary Ban Ki-moon. You said: "UN resolution 2758 does not even mention Taiwan." It recognized that the People's Republic of China is the sole and legitimate representative Government of China and doesn't recognize the government in Taiwan. That's why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations, because they are no longer recognized.
    1
  15941.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "As of 12/12/2025 there are no internationally recognized treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China and you have failed to prove otherwise." In other words, you're saying the words "Taiwan is part of China" have to be stated in the document? Then you've already proven your own statement wrong, since those words (Taiwan is part of China) are indeed stated in the 1982 US/PRC One China Policy. Look, you even quoted the document and stated those exact words yourself: Evidence below: "The Government of the United States of America acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China." ... Therefore, the words "Taiwan is part of China" have been stated in the document you quoted, so your claim that "there are no internationally recognized treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China" has been proven wrong.
    1
  15942.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  The handbook represents long-standing UN convention regarding Resolution 2758 that Taiwan is part of China. Even UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was following UN standard protocol when he stated: "The position of the United Nations is that the People's Republic of China is representing the whole of China as the sole and legitimate representative Government of China... The resolution (General Assembly Resolution 2758) that you just mentioned is clearly mentioning that the Government of China is the sole and legitimate Government and the position of the United Nations is that Taiwan is part of China." — UN General Secretary Ban Ki-moon.
    1
  15943.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  The handbook represents long-standing UN convention regarding Resolution 2758 that Taiwan is part of China. Even UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was following UN standard protocol when he stated: "The resolution that you just mentioned is clearly mentioning that the Government of China is the sole and legitimate Government and the position of the United Nations is that Taiwan is part of China." – UN General Secretary Ban Ki-moon. You said: "UN resolution 2758 does not even mention Taiwan." It recognized that the People's Republic of China is the sole and legitimate representative Government of China and doesn't recognize the government in Taiwan. That's why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations, because they are no longer recognized.
    1
  15944.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  The handbook represents long-standing UN convention regarding Resolution 2758 that Taiwan is part of China. Even UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was following UN standard protocol when he stated: _"The resolution that you just mentioned is clearly mentioning that the Government of China is the sole and legitimate Government and the position of the United Nations is that Taiwan is part of China." You said: "UN resolution 2758 does not even mention Taiwan." It recognized that the People's Republic of China is the sole and legitimate representative Government of China and doesn't recognize the government in Taiwan. That's why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations, because they are no longer recognized.
    1
  15945.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  The handbook represents long-standing UN convention regarding Resolution 2758 that Taiwan is part of China. Even UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was following UN standard protocol when he stated: "The resolution that you just mentioned is clearly mentioning that the Government of China is the sole and legitimate Government and the position of the United Nations is that Taiwan is part of China."
    1
  15946.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  The handbook represents long-standing UN convention regarding UN Resolution 2758 that Taiwan is part of China. Even UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was simply following UN standard protocol when he stated: " the position of the United Nations is that Taiwan is part of China." You said: "UN resolution 2758 does not even mention Taiwan." It recognized that the People's Republic of China is the sole and legitimate representative Government of China and doesn't recognize the government in Taiwan. That's why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations, because they are no longer recognized.
    1
  15947.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  The handbook represents long-standing UN convention regarding UN Resolution 2758 that Taiwan is part of China. Even UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was simply following UN standard protocol when he stated: "the position of the United Nations is that Taiwan is part of China." And mind you, the handbook was published in 2003.
    1
  15948.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "UN Resolution 2758 is internationally recognized the handbook is not." The handbook represents long-standing UN convention regarding Resolution 2758 that Taiwan is part of China. Even UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was following UN standard protocol when he stated: "The resolution that you just mentioned is clearly mentioning that the Government of China is the sole and legitimate Government and the position of the United Nations is that Taiwan is part of China."
    1
  15949.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "UN Resolution 2758 is internationally recognized the handbook is not." The handbook represents the long-standing UN convention regarding UN Resolution 2758 that Taiwan is part of China. Otherwise, why is it that Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there some forces that's controlling it and preventing Taiwan's entry into the UN? Even UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was simply following UN standard protocol when he stated: "the position of the United Nations is that Taiwan is part of China." And mind you, the handbook was published in 2003.
    1
  15950.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "As of 12/12/2025 there are no internationally recognized treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China and you have failed to prove otherwise." In other words, you're saying the words "Taiwan is part of China" have to be stated in the document? Then you've already proven your own statement wrong, since those words (Taiwan is part of China) are indeed stated in the 1982 US/PRC One China Policy. Look, you even quoted the document and stated those exact words yourself: Evidence below: "The Government of the United States of America acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China." ... Therefore, the words "Taiwan is part of China" have been stated in the document you quoted, so your claim that "there are no internationally recognized treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China" has been proven wrong.
    1
  15951.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "As of 12/12/2025 there are no internationally recognized treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China and you have failed to prove otherwise." In other words, you're saying the words "Taiwan is part of China" have to be stated in the document? Then you've already proven your own statement wrong, since those words (Taiwan is part of China) are indeed stated in the 1982 US/PRC One China Policy. Look, you even quoted the document and stated those exact words yourself: Evidence below: "The Government of the United States of America acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China." ... Therefore, the words "Taiwan is part of China" have been stated in the document you quoted, so your claim that "there are no internationally recognized treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China" has been proven wrong.
    1
  15952.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "China also has no historical claim, of Taiwan and you cannot prove otherwise." You've already mentioned that Qing Dynasty had declared Taiwan as a province of Qing in 1895, and the Manchu government used both "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their state in their official documents, so isn't that China's historical claim to Taiwan? You said: "Japan was the first country to take full control of Taiwan and you cannot prove otherwise." Yet Japan gave up on Taiwan after its surrender in 1945 at the end of WWII, relinquishing control over all their previously occupied territory. And today, the Republic of China calls itself China and has taken control over Taiwan island. You said: "The latest 1982 US/PRC One China Policy agreement only mentions Chinas position. It does not declare that Taiwan is part of China and you cannot prove otherwise." The words "Taiwan is part of China" is clearly stated in that document, therefore, it has proven your claim that "There are no internationally treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China" wrong, since those exact words are stated in the document you quoted. You said: "Taiwan was only added to the PRC constitution in 1978 and you cannot prove otherwise." So? A country's constitutions can be modified as time goes on. For example, Puerto Rico, Samoa, Guam and Hawaii were added into the US constitution later.
    1
  15953.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "As of 12/12/2025 there are no internationally recognized treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China and you have failed to prove otherwise." In other words, you're saying the words "Taiwan is part of China" have to be stated in the document? Then you've already proven your own statement wrong, since those words (Taiwan is part of China) are indeed stated in the 1982 US/PRC One China Policy. Look, you even quoted the document and stated those exact words yourself: Evidence below: "The Government of the United States of America acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China." ... Therefore, the words "Taiwan is part of China" have been stated in the document you quoted, so your claim that "there are no internationally recognized treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China" has been proven wrong.
    1
  15954.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "The latest 1982 US/PRC One China Policy agreement only mentions Chinas position. It does not declare that Taiwan is part of China and you cannot prove otherwise." The words "Taiwan is part of China" is clearly stated in that document, therefore, it has proven your claim that "There are no internationally treaties, policies or agreements that state Taiwan is part of China" wrong, since those exact words are stated in the document you quoted. You said: "Taiwan was only added to the PRC constitution in 1978 and you cannot prove otherwise." So? A country's constitutions can be modified as time goes on. For example, Puerto Rico, Samoa, Guam and Hawaii were added into the US constitution later.
    1
  15955.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "China also has no historical claim, of Taiwan and you cannot prove otherwise." You've already mentioned that Qing Dynasty had declared Taiwan as a province of Qing in 1895, and the Manchu government used both "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their state in their official documents, so isn't that China's historical claim to Taiwan? You said: "Japan was the first country to take full control of Taiwan and you cannot prove otherwise." Yet Japan gave up on Taiwan after its surrender in 1945 at the end of WWII, relinquishing control over all their previously occupied territory. And today, the Republic of China calls itself China and has taken control over Taiwan island. You said: "Taiwan was only added to the PRC constitution in 1978 and you cannot prove otherwise." So? A country's constitutions can be modified as time goes on. For example, Puerto Rico, Samoa, Guam and Hawaii were added into the US constitution later.
    1
  15956.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "How is your husband going? Please day hello for me." What husband are you talking about? I am a man and it's clear that you've gotten me confused with someone else. You said: "Historically the CCP recognized Formosan independence." Firstly, that's a suggestion, not an formal recognition of Taiwan Independence. Also, Mao Zedong had stated the he supported Taiwan independence from the Japanese, nowhere was it mentioned anything about Taiwan independence from China. Also, Mao's interview was in 1936, whereas by 1949, the ROC had lost the mainland to the CPC and retreated back to Taiwan island, while still claiming to be the real "China." So while ROC still exists in Taiwan, the PRC decided to include Taiwan into its constitution. You said: "What a joke. Hardly what you call a long history." You've already stated yourself that Qing had some degree of control over Taiwan island since 1750, so isn't this proof that Taiwan was part of Chinese history at least during the Qing Dynasty? Also, the Manchu Government used both "China" and "Qing" to refer to their state in their official documents.
    1
  15957.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "The Qing government were not Chinese." After conquering China proper, the Manchus identified their state as "China", equivalently as Zhōngguó (中國; 'middle kingdom') in Chinese. The emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including, among other areas, present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, and Tibet) as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that only Han areas were properly part of "China". The government used "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their state in official documents, including the Chinese-language versions of treaties and maps of the world. So how was the Qing government not Chinese? You said: "The Qing never controlled Taiwan." Earlier, you said that Qing had some degree of control over Taiwan. You said: "They only declared Formosa a Province of the Qing in an attempt to illegitimise Japan's true conquering of the island." And so begins China's historical claim over Taiwan. Declaring Taiwan as a province of Qing (or China interchangeably) marked the beginning of China's historical claim over Taiwan.
    1
  15958.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: "I asked you which countries signed the handbook. Please list the countries that signed the handbook? It is NOT an official document." The handbook is not for signature, you think it's some sort of autograph book? It is an official document since it's available on the United Nations Treaty Collection website. You said: "The UN handbook is not even published by the UN." The Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties Handbook is available on the UN website, specifically the United Nations Treaty Collection
    1
  15959.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: _"Tell me, what official internationally recognized and signed document states that Taiwan is part of China?" Didn't I answer this multiple times already? The words "Taiwan is part of China" are stated in the 1982 US/PRC One China Policy. You even quoted the text: "The Government of the United States of America acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China." and the words "Taiwan is part of China" are stated in the document you quoted.
    1
  15960.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  According to the United Nations Meetings Coverage and Press Releases (dated 23 May 2024) Daily Press Briefing by the Office of the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General Question: Two questions about two parts of the world, and by the way, is summer over? The first, about your comment on China and Taiwan. You said the resolution of 1971. From what my history, from what I remember, is that’s the resolution that changed Taiwan to China, to communist China, right? The Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China. Is that what you’re referring to? And what does that mean in this context? Spokesman: Well, it means in terms of our standing on Taiwan as a province of China. Stephane Dujarric, spokesperson for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres
    1
  15961.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  According to the United Nations Meetings Coverage and Press Releases (dated 23 May 2024) Daily Press Briefing by the Office of the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General Question: Two questions about two parts of the world, and by the way, is summer over? The first, about your comment on China and Taiwan. You said the resolution of 1971. From what my history, from what I remember, is that’s the resolution that changed Taiwan to China, The Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China. Is that what you’re referring to? And what does that mean in this context? Spokesman: Well, it means in terms of our standing on Taiwan as a province of China. (The above answer was given by Stephane Dujarric, spokesperson for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres)
    1
  15962.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: _"Tell me, what official internationally recognized and signed document states that Taiwan is part of China?" So the words "Taiwan is part of China" have to be stated in the document? Those words are stated in the 1982 US/PRC One China Policy. You even quoted the text: "The Government of the United States of America acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China." and those words are clearly are stated in the document you quoted.
    1
  15963.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: _"Tell me, what official internationally recognized and signed document states that Taiwan is part of China?" The words "Taiwan is part of China" are stated in the 1982 US/PRC One China Policy. You even quoted the text: "The Government of the United States of America acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China." and those words are clearly are stated in the document you quoted.
    1
  15964.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  You said: _"Tell me, what official internationally recognized and signed document states that Taiwan is part of China?" So the words "Taiwan is part of China" have to be stated in the document? Those words are stated in the 1982 US/PRC One China Policy. You even quoted the text out loud and those words (i.e "Taiwan is part of China") are stated in the document you quoted.
    1
  15965.  @ResearchFirst-z7j  "Tell me, what official internationally recognized and signed document states that Taiwan is part of China??" I've already told you. The words "Taiwan is part of China" are stated in the 1982 US/PRC One China Policy. You even quoted the text, and the words "Taiwan is part of China" are stated (as the last five words) in the document you quoted.
    1
  15966.  @abbotsful  If there was to be a food shortage in China, then the countries that depend on Chinese produce would be the first to feel the pinch, as China either halts or recalls the export of produce elsewhere.
    1
  15967.  @abbotsful  The countries that depend on Chinese agricultural imports will be the first to be affected by any potential food shortage in China, as China halts or recalls our produce exports.
    1
  15968.  @abbotsful  How does trade deficit factor into my point? The countries that depend on Chinese agricultural produce will somehow be saved because of trade deficit? That doesn't appear to be the case.
    1
  15969.  @abbotsful  Because some countries depend on Chinese agricultural imports, so if there is to be a food shortage in China, China can simply halt all shipments of food (X) overseas in order to feed our own population.
    1
  15970.  @abbotsful  Over half of China's agricultural imports is actually soybeans (which is mostly used as animal feed) so China isn't really the largest importer of food. Here's a Video: Top 15 Countries By Food Imports 1960-2018 ( % of Merchandise Imports ) youtu.be/M3LyAXiLCgc In 2018: 1. Guinea-Bissau (50.69) 2. Benin (47.81) 3. Yemen (46.93) 4. Eritrea (45.55) 5. Kiribati (40.7) 6. Sierra Leone (32.57) 7. Afghanistan (32.27) 8. Equatorial Guinea (31.8) 9. Comoros (31.45) 10. Timor-Leste (30.22) 11. Cabo Verde (30.2) 12. Djibouti (29.32) 13. Sao Tome and Principe (29.21) 14. Samoa (28.43) 15. Antigua and Barbuda (27.77)
    1
  15971.  @samuel-ie5xl  One of your demands, specifically that all those rioters arrested by police be set scot free, is simply too much. Why should Hong Kong Police release these criminals who vandalise walls, damage public property, breaking windows, security cameras, traffic lights and so on? Why not talk about the terms face to face, instead of rioting with no end in sight?
    1
  15972.  @pronukespontaneous8090  The Hong Kong extradition bill was proposed because of a certain incident. Some Hong Kong guy named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, and stuff her body in her suitcase, then flew back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body for the authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to Taiwan to face justice, but Hong Kong discovered that there's no existing extradition treaty between Hong Kong and Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. That's why Carrie Lam introduced the ammendments to the Hong Kong extradition bill, to cover up this legal loophole. Do the protestors even understand what they are protesting about? Have they read the amendment bill and understood its contents in their entirety?
    1
  15973. Israel even targets its own hostages being held in Gaza
    1
  15974. It was British India's decision to partition itself into two countries, creating Pakistan and India. Pakistan is now its own independent country (as recognized by India) has been China's friend and ally since then. For example, Pakistan has hopped onboard China's Belt and Road Initiative, whereas China also invited India to join but India rejected China's decision.
    1
  15975.  @nicholaspardo30  If you want to talk about prison populations, then it's actually America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity, that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts out onto the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons.
    1
  15976.  @andrenogueira5058  The U.S invaded Iraq and Afghanistan, yet there was no punishment meted out against it. In Afghanistan, the U.S occupied the land for nearly 20 years, during which they imposed Western Style democracy on to the country. But the U.S's shambolic withdrawal from Kabul proved the democratic experiment a failure in Afghanistan, and the democratically elected Afghan President Ghani fled the country with carloads of U.S cash. The 300,000-strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban in just weeks with minimal resistance, and the U.S abandoned $7 billion worth of U.S military hardware for the Taliban. Seems like you're just projecting onto China with the Renminbi, what the U.S is doing with the Dollar. It's just your conjecture that China will follow in the U.S footsteps that's all. What economic sanctions on Australia? There exists Chinese tariffs on Australian wine and barley, but these are not the same as sanctions. Are you conflating the two terms together? Also, the World Health Organization visited the Wuhan Institute of Virology and they've all but ruled out the possibility of a lab leak as highly unlikely, so why are you hurling accusations that have already been debunked?
    1
  15977.  @andrenogueira5058  The U.S invaded Iraq and Afghanistan, yet there was no punishment meted out against it. In Afghanistan, the U.S occupied the land for nearly 20 years, during which they imposed Western Style democracy on to the country. But the U.S's shambolic withdrawal from Kabul proved the democratic experiment a failure in Afghanistan, and the democratically elected Afghan President Ghani fled the country with carloads of U.S cash. The 300,000-strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban in just weeks with minimal resistance, and the U.S abandoned $7 billion worth of U.S military hardware for the Taliban. It's just your conjecture that China will follow in the U.S footsteps that's all. What economic sanctions on Australia? There exists Chinese tariffs on Australian wine and barley, but these are not the same as sanctions. Are you conflating the two terms together?
    1
  15978.  @UMAKEMESMILESWACKIN  So far, Kharkiv and Izium are under Russian control
    1
  15979. @R Sarabin My snipers? You're referring to snipers from the People's Liberation Army? Why would China pit snipers against Russian artillery?
    1
  15980. @R Sarabin Are you sure the Russians are getting a bloodied nose? Ukraine is no match for Russia's hypersonic missile, Kinzhal (Dagger) which travels are more than 10x the speed of sound, so fast that a plasma bubble forms around the warhead, absorbing radar and masking its speedy approach, and striking Ukrainian ammo and fuel depots with precision.
    1
  15981.  @UMAKEMESMILESWACKIN  Do you actually have actual footage of the massacre in crossing the river?
    1
  15982.  @UMAKEMESMILESWACKIN  Watch RT news on Odysee or Rumble, it turns out that the Russia's Ministry of Defense has published footage of forces destroying a Ukrainian pontoon crossing. You can see the actual bombing of the bridges. But it appears that Ukraine drone filmed their own destroyed bridge and claimed that it was a Russian pontoon bridge that was destroyed by Ukrainian forces.
    1
  15983.  @UMAKEMESMILESWACKIN  If RT is a joke then why is it banned in the EU? You're only getting your information from one side instead of hearing from both sides. This is not the first time the Ukrainians claim that they destroyed Russian vehicles when it turns out that it was Russians who destroyed Ukrainian vehicles. Remember Ukrainians claiming they shot a Russian helicopter down over Snake Island? Turns out it was a Ukrainian chopper that was shot down by Russian forces instead. We know this because the helicopter was releasing para-troops over Snake Island, when the island is under the control of Russia, so it was a Ukrainian helicopter.
    1
  15984.  @UMAKEMESMILESWACKIN  If RT is a joke then why is it banned in the EU? You're only getting your information from one side instead of hearing from both sides.
    1
  15985.  @UMAKEMESMILESWACKIN  This is not the first time the Ukrainians claim that they destroyed Russian vehicles when it turns out that it was the other way round. Remember Ukrainians claiming they shot a Russian helicopter down over Snake Island? Turns out it was a Ukrainian chopper that was shot down by Russian forces instead. We know this because the helicopter was releasing para-troops over Snake Island, when the island is under the control of Russia, so it was a Ukrainian helicopter.
    1
  15986.  @UMAKEMESMILESWACKIN  I get information from multiple sources. Turns out the so-called "massacre" had its death toll inflated by the Ukrainians. Those tanks claimed to be destroyed were actually resting in guard formation. Defense Politics Asia does a good job debunking the Ukrainian propaganda here:youtu.be/MKX1MKW5wjE
    1
  15987.  @UMAKEMESMILESWACKIN  I get information from multiple sources. Turns out the so-called "massacre" had its death toll inflated by the Ukrainians. Those tanks claimed to be destroyed were actually resting in guard formation (and you don't see smoke coming out of it.) I suggest you watch a YT channel named Defense Politics Asia for an analyst into the pontoon bridge destruction.
    1
  15988.  @UMAKEMESMILESWACKIN  Search YT for this video: [ Luhansk Front ] Ukrainian Forces destroy pontoon bridge near Bilohorivka - explained. (By Defense Politics Asia)
    1
  15989.  @laserraiset3300  Those people starved to death because of the Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather like flood and drought, destroying crops and resulting in poor harvest. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't that right?
    1
  15990.  @MarkYeung1  "China is sending dozens of warplanes over Taiwan daily." When did Chinese warplanes flew over Taiwan? Chinese warplanes flew over international airspace and were closer to the mainland than over Taiwan.
    1
  15991.  @dagsmoko3889  "It is China, not the US that has created the latest mess in the Solomon Islands" Those rioters in Solomon Islands Chinatown decide to attack Chinese people and shops, yet somehow China is to blame for all this?
    1
  15992.  @miguelisip8122  You said: "Communism that time was an existential threat." Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the endgoal being the depletion of the Earth's resources. Communism is the belief that goods should be distributed according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" (German: Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen)
    1
  15993.  @miguelisip8122  You said: "Yes the US has faults in relation with other countries but we need to admit that US leadership makes the world a safer place." China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  15994.  @stopwarstop7334  You said: "China is the only one bullying around in the SEA region acting like barbarians building artificial islands in the South China Sea saying it's theirs" Wrong, there are other SEA countries like Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines that get into maritime disputes with each other, and they are also building artificial Islands.
    1
  15995.  @stopwarstop7334  The People's Republic of China claims 9 Dash Line, but the Republic of China claims 11 Dash Line, so isn't Taiwan the one claiming more of the South China Sea than the mainland?
    1
  15996.  @stopwarstop7334  The 11 Dash Line is published by the Republic of China 🇹🇼 on 1945 and they haven't relinquished their claim. Even Taiwan Island still maintains the claim of the the 11 Dash Line, and that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution as well.
    1
  15997.  @stopwarstop7334  "神州 Shenzhou nobody is building artificial island in the South China Sea except China okay. Proof evidenve if there is." Read the article: Vietnam Quietly Builds Up 10 Islands in South China Sea by VOA news.
    1
  15998.  @ThatBoomerDude56  "神州 Shenzhou China tried to utterly destroy its thousands of years worth of tradition and history while it was in the middle of being a completely failed state with tens of millions starving." China's 5,000 years of history and culture are far too expansive to "utterly destroy". China has many historical monuments like The Great Wall of China, Forbidden City, Qin Emperor Tomb, Terracotta Army, The Grand Canal (world's oldest and longest artificial river) and many more historical sites. Here's some videos of Chinese historical monuments. Video: The Great Wall of China in 4k - DJI Phantom 4 youtu.be/EotbKqZmBuY?t=20 Video: Forbidden City, Beijing, China in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/R9vcSWb6mug Video: Terracotta Army, Xian, China in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/VhIouznYlvo
    1
  15999.  @ThatBoomerDude56  "The only thing that allowed it to prosper was its implementation of capitalism." About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    1
  16000.  @dagsmoko3889  "神州 Shenzhou You'd better check out Chinese/ccp approved business activity there, especially mining and logging on Malaita." It's their own Solomon government that approved such business activity, why are you somehow trying to blame it on the Chinese/CPC? "Check out the influence of the ccp on the decision to break with Taiwan in favour of China, and the effect it had on the Malaitans." What exactly does Taiwan offer the Malaitans when compared to mainland China?
    1
  16001.  @ThatBoomerDude56  You said: "China is a simple child among the adult nations of the world." China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  16002.  @ThatBoomerDude56  You said: "People who are called "China haters in the USA" don't actually hate China. They just hate the fascist Chinese "Communist" Party." How does that explain the anti-China hate crimes committed against ordinary people of Asian descent (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, etc) in America, Australia, Canada, etc? These ordinary Asians are certainly not members of the Communist Party of China, yet they are being singled out and discriminated against by other Americans, Australians, Canadians, etc.
    1
  16003.  @stopwarstop7334  Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a Map of all the territory Taiwan claims (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Taiwan still maintains the 11 Dash Line claim, they even protest the Hague Tribunal ruling in favour of Phillipines.
    1
  16004.  @stopwarstop7334  So you admitted that Vietnam is building artificial islands in the South China Sea? Then I have refuted your claim that "神州 Shenzhou nobody is building artificial island in the South China Sea except China okay. Proof evidenve if there is."
    1
  16005.  @stopwarstop7334  You said: "Chinese reclamation work is especially upsetting to Vietnam because China controls the full Paracel island chain, also claimed by Vietnam." I looked up the Paracel Islands UNCLOS EEZ and majority of those islands lie within 200 NM of China's geographic baseline, (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracel_Islands#UNCLOS_EEZ ) so what's wrong with China claiming the Paracel Islands?
    1
  16006.  @stopwarstop7334  Why does the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 have to ask Republic of China 🇹🇼 for permission to claim on their behalf? The ROC has the 11th Dash Line, while the PRC has the 9 Dash Line, since Taiwan still have the 11 Dash Line claim then why can't mainland China have the 9 Dash Line?
    1
  16007.  @stopwarstop7334  So the majority of Paracel Islands are within 200 NM of China's geographic baseline, then can't China claim the Paracel Islands as part of UNCLOS EEZ? Why did you claim it's within Vietnam EEZ but not China's EEZ?
    1
  16008.  @ThatBoomerDude56  "神州 Shenzhou So they didn't tear down the wall. Big deal. I'm not talking about bricks and buildings. If the wall & buildings are the sum total of Chinese culture to you, that is a sad commentary on either Chinese culture or your appreciation of it." Apart from historical buildings, Chinese celebrate many historical festivals such as Spring Festival (Chinese New Year), Lantern Festival, Qingming (Grave Sweeping) Festival, Dragonboat Festival, Double Seventh (Chinese Valentines Day) Festival, Mid-autumn Festival, and so on. Here's some video of Chinese festivals in China. Video: Dragon Boat Races Celebrate China's Ancient Past | National Geographic youtu.be/YlPExNPyPwQ Video: Lantern Festival celebrated across China youtu.be/XnXzQ-p-DpY Video: How modern Chinese celebrate the Qingming Festival youtu.be/mFGYrPNXaLg
    1
  16009.  @ThatBoomerDude56  "But most Chinese in the United States get along with everyone around them just fine. You are believing sensationalist media hype." Chinese get in the United States get along with everyone around them just fine, but it's the anti-China haters that target Chinese (as well as people of Asian descent). Yet you are excusing their racist actions by claiming that most anti-China haters hate the Communist Party of China. Then why are they taking out their anger on ordinary Asians who are not part of the CPC. How do you explain this anti-China hate crimes against individuals, not the CPC?
    1
  16010.  @ThatBoomerDude56  "神州 Shenzhou It's sad that you deny Chinese history." I've already explained that China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today. Throughout our long history, China's political system is authoritarian, under the leadership of the Chinese Emperor and the Imperial Court. Because China has always had a system of a strong central government, whereas China had never been truly governed by a Western brand of democracy, so should China abandon our system (that works), and adopt Western style democracy?
    1
  16011.  @ThatBoomerDude56  "神州 Shenzhou Because of capitalism, the amount of starvation in the world has dramatically declined over the past two centuries despite the increasing world population." Well, the amount of starvation in developed Western countries dramatically declined, but sadly the starvation in poorer, developing countries remained the same, if not worsened. For example, India used to rarely have famines, but when it became a British colony, there were several famines under British colonial rule, because British made Indian farmers grew opium instead of crops to feed themselves.
    1
  16012.  @ThatBoomerDude56  You said: "Because capitalism creates wealth that did not previously exist, as nations have industrialized, their populations have stabilized and have even started to decline in many cases." This is a myth. Wealth wasn't really created (nor did it previously not exist) it was the capitalistic exploitation of less developed countries by the more developed countries (i.e USA, Australia, Britain, Canada, EU countries) for colonies, natural resources, slaves, all the while restricting those countries from developing. For example, by 1800s, over a 100 million kg of silver had been stolen from Latin America and inserted in the European economy, first into Spain and then into the rest of Europe as payment from Spain's debt. To maintain the extraction of wealth from the colonies, the rich nations kept the poor nations in a state of dependency. The rich nations assigned poor nations a particular resource for extraction (such as bananas) creating a mono-culture revolving around this one resource, trapping them in a locked economy and denying them opportunity for expansion.
    1
  16013.  @ThatBoomerDude56  While it's possible that humans may never attain true communism, it doesn't mean we should not strive towards such a system. Lets take the unequal global distribution of Covid-19 vaccines for example. Because of capitalism, rich developed countries are buying up and hoarding Covid-19 vaccines for themselves, leaving little to no vaccines for the poorer developing countries. Pharmaceutical companies are motivated by profits because of capitalism, and they sell their vaccines to the countries that can afford to fork out more money. Communism is the belief that resources should be distributed according to needs. As the Marxist slogan goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" (German: Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen). Had we been living in a truly communistic society, the Covid-19 vaccines would have been distributed according to needs, and the poorer countries that desperately need them would get vaccines and this would be a more efficient way to combat the coronavirus. As Tedros from WHO said: "It's better to have some people in all countries vaccinated, than to have all people in some countries vaccinated.". It's evident that capitalism is actually prolonging the pandemic.
    1
  16014. ​ @ThatBoomerDude56  " -- forced millions of people to put tremendous effort into destroying all semblance of the 5,000 years of tradition, philosophy, art, and culture of China" Haven't you seen the videos about historical buildings the Great Wall of China, the Forbidden City, the Terracotta Army, the Grand Canal? Or of Chinese festivals like Spring Festival (Chinese New Year), Dragonboat Festival, Lantern Festival, Qingming (Grave Sweeping) Festival, and so on? Why then do you claim 5,000 years of tradition, philosophy, art, and culture of China is "utterly destroyed"? China has many philosophers such as Confucius (孔夫子) Mencius (孟子), Mozi (墨翟), Laozi (老子) just to name a few. China has many schools of thinking such as Confucianism, Taoism, Mohism, Legalism, as well as military textbooks, just take the Sun Zi's The Art of War 《孙子兵法》 it's a famous thousand-year old military textbook that's still being taught in modern military academies (including West Point). Then what makes you think Chinese culture is "utterly destroyed"?
    1
  16015.  @ThatBoomerDude56  You said: "Fortunately, much of the ancient tradition and culture of China survives in the nation of Taiwan..." Where's the equivalent of the Great Wall of China on Taiwan island? Or take the recent Hanfu Revival Movement (汉服复兴运动) where young Chinese dress up in traditional Han clothing (汉服 Hanfu) and you don't see many people in Taiwan proudly wearing Han clothing, because wearing such a clothing may be taken as being pro-mainland. Video: Beautiful Traditional Costume: Han Chinese Clothing (Hanfu) youtu.be/T6CucJxiWec?t=5 Yet you claim Taiwan island has more of the ancient tradition and culture of China than the mainland? Where's the Hanfu movement in Taiwan as compared to the mainland?
    1
  16016.  @ThatBoomerDude56  About Chinese culture, the annual Spring Festival (Chinese New Year) migration is |regarded as the world's largest annual human migration surpassing even the Christmas migration by sheer volume of traffic as Chinese return to our home province for the new year's. Video: Chinese New Year travel: the world’s largest annual human migration youtu.be/wffxHRrljsQ So more people in China celebrate Chinese New Year than people celebrating Christmas in the rest of the world combined! Yet you're claiming China’s 5,000 years of history, culture and tradition is "utterly destroyed"?
    1
  16017.  @ThatBoomerDude56  I don't understand why you claim China's 5,000 years of history, tradition and culture is "utterly destroyed beyond semblance" when there's Chinese New Year, Lantern Festival, Hanfu Revival Movement, The Great Wall of China, Terracotta Army, The Forbidden City, and so much of it remaining. The Forbidden City in Beijing in fact, is the world's most visited palace, surpassing even Western palaces by sheer volume of visitors. Most Visited Palaces in the World 1. Forbidden City (Beijing, China): 17,000,000 visitors per year 2. St. Peter's Basilica (Vatican City): 11,000,000 visitors per year 3. Palace of Versailles (Versailles, France): 8,100,000 visitors per year 4. Lincoln Memorial (Washington D.C, United States): 7,804,683 visitors per year 5. Colosseum (Rome, Italy): 7,650,519 visitors per year ... Video: Comparison: Most Visited Palaces and Monuments youtu.be/54ugTVUDho4
    1
  16018.  @ThatBoomerDude56  "神州 Shenzhou Again you equate the existence of buildings with "culture." It's really sad that you have no appreciation of actual culture and art." China's museums are among the most visited museums in the world, here's a list of the most-visited museums in the world: 1. Louvre (France Paris): 2,700,000 visitors per year 2. National Museum of China (Beijing, China): 1,600,000 visitors per year 3. Tate Modern (London, United Kingdom): 1,433,000 visitors per year 4. Shanghai Science and Technology Museum (Shanghai, China): 1,351,000 visitors per year 5. Vatican Museums (Vatican City): 1,300,000 visitors per year 6. British Museum (London,United Kingdom ): 1,275,000 visitors per year 7. Museo Reina Sofía (Madrid, Spain): 1,248,000 visitors per year 8. Russian Museum (Saint Petersburg, Russia): 1,203,324 visitors per year 9. National Gallery (London,United Kingdom): 1,197,000 visitors per year 10. Natural History Museum (London, United Kingdom): 1,197,000 visitors per year 11. Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York City, United States): 1,125,000 visitors per year 12. Hunan Museum (Changsha, China): 1,130,000 visitors per year 13. Shanghai Natural History Museum (Shanghai, China): 1,040,000 visitors per year 14. Zhejiang Museum (Hangzhou, China): 1,108,000 visitors per year 15. National Taiwan Science Education Center (Taipei, China): 1,082,000 visitors per year ... Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-visited_museums#List Yet what makes you claim the China's history, tradition and culture is utterly destroyed beyond semblance? And you claim Taiwan island has more ancient culture than the mainland? How? Where's the Hanfu Movement in Taiwan as compared to the mainland?
    1
  16019. ​ @ThatBoomerDude56  "神州 Shenzhou So all you do is reinforce what I said. Culture is a living thing." I've already brought up Spring Festival (Chinese New Year), Lantern Festival, Dragonboat Festival and other festivals, but you just refused to acknowledge them. Or just take the Hanfu Revival Movement in China for example, more and more young people are dressing up in traditional Hanfu and bringing it back in fashion. Video: Young people in China want traditional Han clothing back in fashion youtu.be/cip9DA1UvHk But where's the Hanfu Movement in Taiwan island as compared to the mainland? Yet you claimed Taiwan has basically more ancient tradition and culture of China than the mainland? How?
    1
  16020.  @ThatBoomerDude56  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  16021.  @dagsmoko3889  "Cyrus is a ccp mouthpiece doing the ccp's work;" If we give you the benefit of the doubt, are you saying that Cyrus Janssen's message of "Build Bridges, Not Walls" is the same message as the Communist Party of China? Then isn't that a positive message for the world? Cyrus is clearly concerned that U.S-China relations are deteriorating and this could potentially lead to outright war between the two powers (which would be a disaster for the world) so isn't Cyrus doing good here by helping spread awareness of this worst case scenario and how to avoid it?
    1
  16022.  @dagsmoko3889  "神州 Shenzhou China offers unsustainable logging, environmental degradation and bugger all for the local people, similar with their mining." China offers infrastructure development to Solomon Islands, and the unrest in Malaita were the result of economic woes. As for political interference, what does the everyday local care about Taiwan, when mainland China has clearly more told offer in terms of development and infrastructure? And what debt does the Solomon Islands have with China?
    1
  16023.  @ThatBoomerDude56  "神州 Shenzhou All superficial compared to the 5,000 years of Chinese culture and philosophy." If you look at 5,000 years of Chinese culture and philosophy, China has always been under the authoritarian rule of Emperors and the Imperial Court (and in sense, we still are today). Throughout Chinese history, China was always governed under a strong central government, and the current system under President Xi Jinping and the Communist Party of China closely emulates the political system of China's history. At least far more than the Western brand of democracy, China was in no way democratic during it's entire history, then is there really a need to abandon our political system and adopt a Western style democracy? I mean, just look at India, the world's 2nd most populous country after China and the world's largest democracy, and why hasn't India surpassed China if you claim the Western brand of democracy is superior?
    1
  16024.  @ThatBoomerDude56  So why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan island? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang under Chiang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants, and had to flee to Taiwan island. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China. Yet why do you claim Taiwan should have been the rightful government of the mainland China also?
    1
  16025.  @dagsmoko3889  "神州 Shenzhou Cyrus is trying to help the ccp fool the world about China's stealth war and military actions and intentions." China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here. And it still doesn't change the fact that Cyrus' message is one of peace, of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" and if you claim that's the message the CPC is sending, then isn't that a good thing for the world? A war between U.S and China would be a disaster for the world.
    1
  16026.  @dagsmoko3889  "神州 Shenzhou The mou they've signed up to with China will see them take on a lot of debt. They haven't seen much economic good or sustainable development to date." China does not force other countries to borrow from our banks, nor does China tell them how much to borrow, it's up to each individual governments how much they wish to loan from China. But Chinese banks must be offering favorable terms and interest rates, if developing countries would rather borrow from China banks rather than Western institutions like the IMF or the World Bank.
    1
  16027. ​ @RamonChiNangWong078  A bully? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  16028.  @bradlys4978  You said: "Read and learn who is the most judgemental and racist. it's not the west. it's China. Who is the bully? think" Westerners are literally judging China from afar, even though many of them never actually set foot in China and seen what life is like for themselves. They assume Chinese people are oppressed under our government yet you're claiming China is the judgemental one? As for being racist, one need not look any further than the sheer number of anti-Asian hate crimes being committed against Asian Americans, Asian Australians, Asian Canadians, etc in comparison to anti-Anglo Saxxon hate crimes in China. Yet you're claiming China is the racist one? As for bullying, China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the USA is the real bully here and a threat to global peace and stablity.
    1
  16029.  @RamonChiNangWong078  "神州 Shenzhou lol, that's lots of Debt traps China have build." A Lowry Institute report published by Chatham House has debunked the myth of China's debt traps. You said: "I'm not from the US, but damn, you wumao defenders like to blame the US for every thing" You were claiming about "punching China for being a bully" but the real threat to global peace and stability here is clearly the United States, then why are you seemingly blaming China?
    1
  16030.  @RamonChiNangWong078  "神州 Shenzhou damm, you mainlanders likes to believe you're the good guys. so have you ever been outside the comfort of your first world city?" The problem is why do you seem to think China is the bad guy? I've had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, and I was appalled at the sheer volume of anti-China propaganda in the West. Whenever I bring up China's positive achievements under communist party leadership, many Westerners (but not all) just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill, and some even told me to "Go back to China if you like it there!" even though many Westerners haven't actually been to China before.
    1
  16031.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou Ben Pang read his comments and tell me that again sir. I have been to China and have allot of respect for them." So you're claiming China is judgemental and racist, simply because comments by one Ben Pang? Do you have proof that Beng Pang represents all of China? Then how can you claim China is judgemental and racist, because of comments by Ben Pang? I've used examples of how Westerners judge China from afar, with many having never been to China. As for being racist, just look at the rising numbers of anti-Asian hate crimes committed against Asians in Western countries, compared to the anti-Western hate crimes by people in China. You said: "they just throw racist comments. I'm not even German and he is calling me a Nazi." Does one have to be German to be a Nazi? There are instances where non-Germans have been arrested for possession of Nazi materials, for example a British boy from Cornwall had downloaded Nazi materials and been arrested.
    1
  16032.  @bradlys4978  You said: "then he thought I was from different nations and started making racist comment about those nations. He still does not even know me yet continues to be racist. There are plenty also like him on this channel. Makes it hard to communicate with so much hate. I left China 3 years ago. How can you be racist to your own people. He didn't even ask if I was Chinese. But I am." I've read your words and according to you, this Ben Pang made racist comments about other nations right? And Ben Pang apparently doesn't know that you're Chinese right? Then how do you know if Ben Pang is a Chinese mainlander in the first place? Giving you the benefit of the doubt, if we assume that Ben Pang is a Chinese mainlander, how can a Chinese be racist to our own people when he doesn't even know you're Chinese? You mentioned he made racist comment about those nations, but could you point out what racist comment Ben Pang made towards China or Chinese people like you?
    1
  16033.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou no I said the Chinese comments on this channel. Not the people of China." No, you clearly said China, this was what you wrote: "Read and learn who is the most judgmental and racist. it's not the west. it's China. Who is the bully? think" so clearly you're referring to our country and calling us judgemental and racist, when clearly it's the many Westerners that try to judge China from afar, without having set foot in our country and seeing what life is like here for themselves.
    1
  16034.  @bradlys4978  "Also I guess you are right about the Nazi thing. It does not have to be German thing. but I am not white or German." So did you exhibited behavior similar to Nazis? Also isn't the fact that you associate Nazi with being "white or German" indicates borderline racist behavior on your part?
    1
  16035.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou I told him that. I said I think you are American pretending to be Chinese acting badly to give them a bad name. I said the people of CHINA ARE NOTHING LIKE YOU. Go back and read my friend." So according to your words, you think Ben Pang is American pretending to be Chinese and deliberately acting badly to give China a bad name? But that's not proof of Ben Pang being either American or Chinese, it's just what you suspect that's all. And if you know that he's American, then he isn't Chinese, so why are you claiming China is judgemental and racist based off this Ben Pang's comment?
    1
  16036.  @bradlys4978  You said: "I don't think the Chinese as a whole are racist just lots of people on this channel. But as time goes on I am starting to think they might be more racist than I thought." That's fairly reasonable, but the flaw in your thinking is how do you know whether the "people on this channel" are Chinese nationals ? Like Ben Pang for example, you have no proof that he's Chinese mainlander, and you suspect that he's American trying to make Chinese look bad. If what you suspect is true, that's an American being racist, not a Chinese. Since you repeated confirmed that you've been to China previously, then you'll at least have a grasp of how people in China are like. But after you left and log onto this channel, why do you assume that the people on this channel are Chinese without proof? I don't understand this logic, you've physically been to China and interacted with Chinese people here, yet you think that the people on this channel are Chinese without proof?
    1
  16037.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou I did not say anything racist. trust me my friend I don't respect that or support that." Many racist people often say that they're not racist. It's like an Anglo-Saxon saying "I'm not racist, some of my best friends are African American." as an excuse, it doesn't mean that such people aren't racist. I mean, according your description, Ben Pang called you a Nazi (which is an ideology) but you assume he thinks you're German (a nationality/race) so why do you seemingly associate anyone who is a Nazi must be German (or white)? It's borderline racist thinking to think Nazis must be Germans.
    1
  16038.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou I don't know what he is. but some one that is that negative only spreading hate and making China look that bad can not be a China supporter." Then it's best not to jump to wild conclusions whether Ben Pang is Chinese (or even American) without proof. It's like you're using him as an excuse to think Chinese are judgemental and racist, when it's apparent that you've been to China and interacted with people here yourself. You said Ben Pang said racist things about other countries, but I read his comments here, did he say anything racist? He said that US officials sanction IOC officials for attempting to investigate warcrimes by the USA, and that USA has 800 overseas miltary bases whereas China has less than a handful of bases overseas, which are facts not being racist.
    1
  16039.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou Media and reinforced negative remarks with no valid info to be given unlike you." Whose "Media" did he use? And specifically what racist remark did Ben Pang made against other countries? "But I also feel the media has been making Chinese more negative also in the past 3 years with it's propaganda." It's because of Red Scare (fear of communism) and Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many Westerners have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the notion of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many in the West to fathom.
    1
  16040.  @bradlys4978  You said: "I think the two sides causing unneeded tensions with each other has made neutral people like me deal with unreasonable name calling by Chinese people on this channel and also many more other channels." You mentioned "unreasonable name calling by Chinese people" on this channel, but again, how do you know if such people are Chinese mainlanders in the first place? It's like you're jumping to conclusions who these people are, and then claiming China is judgemental and racist (those are your words) but you don't even know the background of these commenters on this channel, you're just assuming that they're Chinese mainlanders that's all. "It seems more and more that the Chinese are becoming the negative ones and the west is slowing down and making more valid arguments lately." Many Chinese have been overseas as tourists and international students, and we've seen the sheer amount of anti-China propaganda in the West, and the judging of China from afar by Westerners, many of whom never actually set foot into China and seen what life is like here for themselves, then how to become cynical of whatever the Western media says? I too had the opportunity to study abroad and I too was appalled at the anti-China sentiment in the West. Whenever I bring up China's positive achievements under the Communist Party to Westerners, many of them (but not all) just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill, and told me to "Go back to China if you like it there!" and they act like they know more about China even though they've never actually been. I don't know of any valid arguments that the West been making lately. It's apparent that America is in decline and China is rising, and the USA is just trying to get its allies to contain China's rise that's all.
    1
  16041.  @bradlys4978  Those names like Eddie Cheang and Ben Pang, they don't sound like Chinese mainlander names at all, they sound more like South East Asian Chinese living in ASEAN countries like Malaysia, Singapore, etc, then how do you know if they are Chinese from the mainland?
    1
  16042.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou Its odd that you don't have a problem with racist Chinese but you have a problem with someone pointing out when a Chinese is racist." Well how do you even know whether someone is a Chinese to even label them racist in the first place? I've been asking you for evidence that Ben Pang is Chinese mainlander, but you have no proof. In fact at one point, you even thought he was American pretending to be Chinese, yet now you're accusing me of having a problem with someone pointing out when a Chinese is racist, when I'm merely trying to establish facts? And I keep asking you what racist comment that Ben Pang made, you only said "Media" (whose media?) and "reinforced negative remarks" but that doesn't qualify as racist. On this comment thread, Ben Pang talked about 800 U.S miltary bases and U.S sanctioning IOC officials for investigating war crimes, and while these are certainly negative about the U.S, they certainly aren't racist. In fact, the only thing pertaining to racist behaviour here is when you associate Nazis with Germans (and being white). Ben Pang called you a Nazi and you immediately assumed it's because you thought he thought you were German, that's already borderline racist behaviour isn't it?
    1
  16043.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou Because he is not the only one. There are many Chinese with the same attitude as he has. Yet your talking to me about it? strange." But you've repeatedly said that you've previously been to China and talked to Chinese people here, then how can you be sure that there are many Chinese with the same attitude? Do you have proof that all those posts made by negative Chinese are in fact Chinese people? Then how can you claim China is judgemental and racist? "I like to pick the negative one to comment to. I usually read the comments and make a remark to the one's that usually spread hate." Firstly, if you support the fact that many people can say negative things about China, then similarly, can't people also point out negative things about the West and other countries? You repeatedly said that Ben Pang made "racist comments" but I scrolled through this comment thread and where did he ever made such a racist comment against other countries? Could you please point them out for me? "There is plenty if you look. Don't look with your eyes closed. actually read all the comments my friend, just scroll and pick a random spots. you will see the many Chinese spreading hate and war messages." Take Ben Pang for example, he's pointing out that USA has 800 bases around the world, and while this is a negative view, it isn't racist or warmongering, because those bases do exist whether he comments on them or not. He also said US should stand trial for war crimes first, and I mean, this is negative about the US, but certainly not racist, so what racist comment did Ben Pang made? And do you even have proof that Ben Pang is a Chinese mainlander in the first place? I looked like you assumed he was American pretending to be Chinese and spreading hate, then why are you seemingly falling for this trap yourself, and assuming Chinese are like that? I thought you repeatedly said that you've previously been to China and talked to people here. I mean, point out what comment made here supposedly made by Chinese that's spreading hate and war messages? I pick @cheongseek sam and he says: "let's get the facts right, China has been the keeper of peace while the American led Anglo-Saxon groups were busy killing Muslims... For more than 40 years the Chinese have not involved in any war" then what's wrong with his post, assuming that he is indeed Chinese?
    1
  16044.  @bradlys4978  Fake News. Bridgestone is NOT withdrawing from China, they operate 2 tyre plants in China, one in Huizhou another in Shenyang. Bridgestone is closing the one in Huizhou and consolidating its manufacturing to Shenyang, it doesn't mean that Bridgestone is pulling out of China. According to Tyrepress: As part of the global footprint restructuring announced as part of its Mid Term Business Plan (2021-2023), Bridgestone Corporation is shutting one of the two truck tyre plants it currently operates in China. It will close the Bridgestone (Huizhou) Tire Co., Ltd. (BSHZ) facility by the end of 2021, consolidating its manufacturing footprint into the Bridgestone (Shenyang) Tire Co., Ltd. (BSSY) plant. This is what happens when you read news off anti-China YouTube websites like China Reports, China Insights, China Uncensored, and so on instead of reading actual news.
    1
  16045.  @bradlys4978  "Lets not forget that China invaded Tibet in 1951" Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Tibet broke free of China in 1913 but wasn't recognised as an independent country and it was eventually reincorporated back into China by 1951.
    1
  16046.  @bradlys4978  According to Tire Technology International article entitled: In accordance with its mid-term business plan, Bridgestone has announced it will consolidate the manufacturing of truck and bus radial tires in China. The company will cease truck and bus tire production at its Huizhou factory. In future, all truck and bus radial tire production operations will be carried out at Bridgestone’s Shenyang factory as the company seeks to rebuild its earning power and enhance strategic growth investments. So Bridgestone isn't withdrawing from China, they're only closing one factory in Huizhou and consolidating their manufacturing in Shenyang. This is the real news you should be reading, not from anti-China channels like China Reports, China Insights, China Uncensored, and so on.
    1
  16047.  @bradlys4978  "At one point because Taiwan was part of China and left it 80+ years ago it now has to be bullied by China?" How has Taiwan left China? If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. And the Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet.
    1
  16048.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou what about the other companies that pulled out of China?" Companies open and close all the time (that's part of the nature of doing business), what other companies do you want to talk about? "You may be right and I do agree the Channel is a biased Channel. But I trust it more than the state run media of China. They don't cover any negative news about China." So did I quote any Chinese media when I talked about Bridgestone? I believe I quoted Tyrepress and Tire Technology International when talking about Bridgestone and they certainly aren't Chinese media. And since according to those sources, Bridgestone isn't withdrawing from China, then what negative news is there for Chinese media to talk about?
    1
  16049.  @bradlys4978  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    1
  16050.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou that's what I mean. Chinese media does not talk about stuff like that." I searched "普利司通关闭惠州厂" on Chinese media and found articles by 中国汽车报 (China Automotive News) so what makes you think Chinese media doesn't talk about this? And you've already gotten the wrong information that Bridgestone is withdrawing from China, then why are you suddenly talking about Chinese media? Nike: Since when did Nike left China? Nike has 109 factories in China as of 2019 Apple: Since when did Apple left China? Apple has 51 suppliers based in China and Hong Kong in 2020. Samsung Electronics: Samsung shut down it's 2 factories in China, because Samsung’s market share fell below 1% in the country, it had to scale back production and it no longer makes financial sense for Samsung to manufacture phones in China. LG Electronics: Since when has LG left China? In 2020, LG Display has started production at its second factory for OLED TV panels. The China factory is currently producing 48-inch panels. .... The rest you can find out yourself.
    1
  16051.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou LG Electronics is one of the topmost Non Chinese TV brands." Nowhere in your first paragraph have you proven that LG left China. In 2019, LG announced the opening of a new OLED panel production plant in Guangzhou, China. The mega factory will be capable of manufacturing ten million large-size OLED panels per year, so how has LG left China? Also the full article for Samsung is: Samsung actually shut down its last remaining smartphone factory in China this year. As of 2019, the company is not making any phones in the People’s Republic. It previously had two factories in China but as Samsung’s market share fell below 1% in the country, it had to scale back production. It no longer makes financial sense for Samsung to manufacture phones in China. So Samsung left China because their market share fell below 1%. "leading Nike to open additional factories in less developed countries such as Indonesia and Vietnam." Nike factories in Indonesia - 38 factories. Nike factories in Vietnam - 105 factories. Nike factories in China - 109 factories So again, how has Nike left China? You claim "Sorry but you are wrong." but you're the one claiming Bridgestone left China when they merely closed their Huizhou factory and consolidated their manufacturing to Shenyang
    1
  16052.  @bradlys4978  Who said Puma has left China? Puma has 222 suppliers manufacturing around 90% of their apparel, footwear and accessory products. Asia remains their strongest sourcing region, and China and Vietnam are the main supplier countries.
    1
  16053.  @bradlys4978  "I typed companies that left China and that is what google told me. tell them that. sorry if you don't like what they said. tell google." Because many Western media is unregulated, that's why fake news spread like wildfire and infected many viewers minds, especially when they don't bother to check beyond the surface, and this has poisoned many people's mindsets towards China. Whereas Chinese media is regulated by the government to weed out the fake news and curb the spread of unproven rumors. Like it or not, it's apparently a system that works for China. "Other things I just don't believe and know it's bad information about china. Like that stupid Channel called The Specifications" That's one example yes. I also checked out the channel you linked, China Reports - The BL and just a glance at their news are overwhelmingly negative about China. I also found other similar-sounding channels like: -China Insights (overwhelmingly negative news about China) -China Observer (overwhelmingly negative news about China) -China Uncensored (overwhelmingly negative news about China) ...
    1
  16054.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou Peng Shuai: How China censored a tennis star. so this is good honest news." Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous relationship with a much older man has been revealed. She recently had a video call with IOC where she expressed the desire for privacy, yet the WTA is demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see. "Just like Dr Li Wenliang, who was hailed a hero for raising the alarm about the coronavirus in the early days of the outbreak, then censored off all Chinese media." As far as I know, Dr Li Wenliang is still being hailed as a hero inside China. In April 2020, Dr Li was posthumously awarded the May Fourth Medal by the government, so who said he is censored off all Chinese media? Have you actually log into Chinese media to confirm your claims? "now I look at you as dishonest and a fool for believing what you say." Seriously? My previous remarks were honest as can be, and even you have checked them out and found most of them to be true. Whereas you were claiming Bridgestone is pulling out of China, when they only closing down their Huizhou plant and consolidating their manufacturing to Shenyang, so who is the one being dishonest and seemingly a fool here? "I said all media is twisting the truth. you say China is right, no they are not always right either." Since you were patient enough to listen to my side of the story, I will also reciprocate the favor by listening to you. Could you point to me an example of an article of news by Chinese media that is not correct? "Please think before you make comments." I put a lot of thought into my comments and phrasing them to specifically attack the points brought up, not attack the commenter himself. But you're making it very difficult to do so, especially when it appears that you hardly put any thought into your comments, like when you thoughtlessly "googling companies that left China" and just shooting your mouth off without proof. Perhaps you should take your own advice into consideration yourself. "China is the worst news to spread propaganda and hate." That sentence can be interpreted as Chinese news suck at spreading propaganda and hate, and this I agree with. Chinese news are the worst at spreading propaganda hate. Chinese news tends to (generally) focus on China's achievements and it doesn't have the hate-spreading effect like Western media has. Also, many people hardly believe Chinese media, even though they quote data and statistics from primary sources, it shows that Chinese propaganda clearly needs improvement. Whereas Western propaganda is the best news to spread propaganda and hate. Almost everyone blindly believe Western anti-China propaganda, even though it's oftentimes unsubstantiated by evidence or from primary sources. And Western media is the best at hate-spreading especially against China, so much such that Western discourse is suffused with anti-China sentiment.
    1
  16055.  @bradlys4978  Here's video of China honoring 14 fallen healthcare workers as martyrs and Dr Li is pictured in it https://youtu.be/PJkCGT80eqY
    1
  16056.  @bradlys4978  "China's BRI project." The Specifications is clearly anti-China like you said earlier. Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China youtu.be/TtduKDpy4oc China has done much to improve Africa in just decades, compared to what Western countries had been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  16057.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou You mean after she reveled to the world she was being sexually assaulted by that old government official. She vanished." I have read Peng Shuai's post (you can find the translated version on Reddit) and she has had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several years in fact, but where are the allegations of sexual assault in her post? Could you please point out where in her post did she say that she was sexually assaulted? And Peng Shuai hasn't vanished. She's been seen in public attending dinners and award ceremonies for youth athletes. Peng Shuai even wrote an email to WTA saying that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent. "In Canada sexually assaulting someone doesn't make it a relationship...China this is the way of officials. normal! you people are sick!" Where's evidence that Peng Shuai was sexually assaulted? You don't have any evidence of that, then why are you seemingly jumping to conclusions about Chinese officials without proof? You're just giving in to your anti-China tendencies and looking down on our country that's all with your words.
    1
  16058.  @bradlys4978  "Dr Li was so censored at the beginning it was crazy" Because at the beginning, nobody knows what the mysterious illness was, so information had to be controlled to curb the spread of unproven rumours. Dr Li's post was on 30th Dec 2019, but China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. So Dr Li's post was only one day earlier.
    1
  16059.  @bradlys4978  You said: "Your claims are twisted and false." Like I said, I put plenty of thought into my posts and cite data where appropriate, but all you seem to do is run your mouth off and make accusations without proof, like when you accused Bridgestone of withdrawing from China, when they merely closed down one of their two tire plants in China. You just seemingly regurgitate Western anti-China news without bothering to verify them beforehand yet whenever I bring up relevant information, you repeatedly accuse my claims of being twisted and false, then what sort of person are you?
    1
  16060.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou The WHO was corrupt and Paid by China to be a lap dog." Where's proof of such a claim? If we look at WHO funding, then the United States is the largest contributor to WHO at $893 million in 2018-2019 as compared to China's contribution at $86 million. Countries that contribute the most to the World Health Organization in 2018-2019 1. U.S ($893 million) 2. U.K ($434 million) 3. Germany ($ 292 million) 4. Japan ($214 million) 5. Canada ($100 million) 6. Norway ($86.4 million) 7. China ($86 million) .... So if anything, the WHO should be in USA's pocket, given that the USA literally contributes 10 times more money to WHO than China, yet you claim the WHO is in China's pocket? How? "Many countries do not support them due to their poor handling of the epidemic and it's lies. They have been proven to be working for Chinas interests only and not the safety of the world." The World Health Organization is the world's foremost authority when it comes to pandemics, the problem is that many countries ignore WHO's advice and then when the pandemic goes out of control in their countries, they start blaming the WHO, and China for their own government's inability to handle the Covid-19 situation in their countries. "More Chinese propaganda and cover ups. even you admit it was covered up in the beginning." When did I ever admit it was covered up in the beginning? Dr Li's post was on 30th Dec 2019, but China had reported the novel coronavirus to WHO by 31st Dec 2019, so it's a difference of 1 day only. China had published 11 journals in the science magazine The Lancet warning other countries of this novel coronavirus, but Western countries ignored it. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them.
    1
  16061.  @bradlys4978  "here are 2 links that show her saying sexual assault!!!" Your first link is from Xianzi, but not Peng Shuai, where is her actual claims of sexual assault? Your second link doesn't even have Peng Shuai mentioning sexual assault, what are you talking about? "Pull your head out of Xi Jinping's ass and quit being so blind to facts. More China lies and covers ups!!" Where's her allegations of sexual assault? I read Peng Shuai's post (you can find the translated version on Reddit) and she has had a rocky, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several years in fact, and while she was emotional in her post, she did not mention any allegation of sexual assault in her post. "Twist the truth all you want, I hear clearly what she said." On 17 Nov, Peng Shuai had written an email to WTA claiming that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. The email also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    1
  16062.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou Yes and none of them are completed. They are over budget and the countries are not see the gains that China promised." The projects take time to complete. One recently completed BRI project was the China-Laos Railway that just opened a couple of weeks ago after 5 years of construction. "The method of building China had shows no environmental care and is very damaging." For many poor developing countries, fossil fuels like coal is still very cheap and affordable compared to renewable energy like solar power and wind power, so China is offering these developing countries infrastructure development that best suits their ability to afford maintaining such infrastructure. "Only China workers make money on the Jobs." Chinese workers, architects and engineers are arguably more experienced in building infrastructure, than say African or local workers in developing countries. Not every local worker is experienced enough to build the modern infrastructure, so it's up to the companies if they want to hire Chinese workers or not. Another issue is that developing countries may lack the engineers required for such projects, so Chinese engineers are hired and in the meantime, countries can build up their engineer numbers. For example, Pakistan plans to double its numbers of engineer graduates in the future. "and the interest rate is too high to be fair." Some of these developing countries have terrorist activity, internal civil strife and unstable governments, so Chinese banks assess the risk involved in loaning to these countries, and they charge interest rates according to how risky the project is. But as high as the interests are, nobody point a gun at these countries and force them to borrow from Chinese banks, they can always borrow from Western organizations like IMF or World Bank, if they find Chinese interest rates unfair.
    1
  16063.  @bradlys4978  "Find me positive feed back from a non Chinese source about the BRI project!!!!" Here's Gyude Moore speaking about China’s expanding presence in Africa at the Paulson Institute's Contemporary China Speakers Series on March 5, 2019. Video: Gyude Moore: “China in Africa: An African Perspective” youtu.be/P5uzxV8ub9k
    1
  16064.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou That is only 1 project out of more that 100. That gets a 1% grade, that's a big fail." What are you some kind of high school teacher for China or something? Grading China like that, didn't you watch my video about African Gyude Moore speaking about China’s expanding presence in Africa at the Paulson Institute's Contemporary China Speakers Series on March 5, 2019. Video: Gyude Moore: “China in Africa: An African Perspective” youtu.be/P5uzxV8ub9k "The Pakistan people are upset with China and are protesting. This is news I just seen today!." Yeah, I bet you got this news from China Uncensored right?
    1
  16065.  @bradlys4978  "You tell lies and only half truths at best. You try make the picture look perfect by covering up 80% of it. the rest of the picture you don't show looks horrible." I have proven myself time and time again with my words. In my posts, I cite data, statistics, articles where appropriate (even you admitted that I checked out earlier) and I draw from a wide variety of sources, whereas you just seemingly blurt out untruths out of nowhere, i.e Bridgestone withdrawing from China (even though they're only closing 1 out of 2 tire plants in China). I mean, earlier you've admitted to just typed companies that left China and that is what Google told you, then you just absolve yourself of all blame? You even said: "here are 2 links that show her saying sexual assault!!!" but I watched those 2 links and they don't even show Peng Shuai saying sexual assault at all in them, I've read Peng Shuai's original post (available translated on Reddit) and while she has had a roller-coaster of a relationship with a much older man, spanning several years in fact, there is no allegation of sexual assault in Peng Shuai's post. So who is the one really spreading lies here? "the small bit of good that China has done does not compare to the bad." China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  16066.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou You make claims but most of you data is just what you say. send links to back up your claims." I already did, but you apparently don't. Like earlier you claimed "The WHO was corrupt and Paid by China to be a lap dog." but where's your proof? If we look at WHO funding, the USA is the biggest contributor to WHO sending $893 million in 2018, whereas China only contributed $86 million during the same period, so how is the WHO in China's pocket? If anything, won't the WHO be in USA's pocket instead of China's? "I showed you links to the tennis player yet you just deny and don't send me links to your statements" Those links don't even quote Peng Shuai's actual words (the first one interviewed someone else rather than Peng Shuai) but if you go to the translated version of Peng Shuai's post, there are no allegations of sexual assault (could you point them out?). On 17 November, Peng Shuai wrote an email to WTA that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    1
  16067.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou Did you watch the video I sent???? it clearly talked about her sexual allegations to that old man." Peng Shuai has had a previous sexual affair with a much older man yes, and from what we know, it was a rocky relationship, on-and-off and it took place over the course of several years. But where is the allegation of sexual assault? You said: "In Canada sexually assaulting someone does not make it a relationship." but you've repeatedly failed to show me where' the line she says that is sexual assault.
    1
  16068.  @bradlys4978  "The USA has been finding new was to disappoint and upset many nations." Just take Biden's "botched" withdrawal from Afghanistan for example. The U.S democratic experiment failed in Afghanistan, after nearly 20 years and pouring trillions of dollars into Afghanistan. The democratically elected Afghan President Ghani fled the country with carloads of U.S cash. The 300,000-strong Afghan Army had surrendered to the Taliban in weeks with minimal resistance, and the U.S abandoned billions of dollars worth of U.S military equipment in Kabul. If anything, this shows that not all countries want to adopt a Western-style democracy as in the case of Afghanistan. The worst thing is that Western allies (Canada, Australia, UK, EU countries) are being dragged into these wars and sacrificing your own soldiers lives dying on foreign soil. And now the U.S has switched its attention to China and are U.S allies going to blindly follow U.S lead again? "I think If China stops threatening to invade Taiwan it will soon look better to the world" When did Beijing threatened to invade Taiwan? President Xi Jinping has publicly spoken that he supports the peaceful reunification of Taiwan with the mainland, so what threat of invasion are you talking about?
    1
  16069.  @bradlys4978  "神州 Shenzhou I know where I stand. pull all investments I have out of China..." So in your words, you want China to fail is that it? The idea of China's economy eventually surpassing the United State's someday in the future, it scares you so much that a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China can overtake the USA sometime in the future, so you wish for China's failure and downfall that's all. Then you are only fueling the Red Scare (fear of communism) and Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset after all. "China does not fit my morals of business ideas I want to support." China is peacefully building infrastructure, whereas the United States is bombing countries and killing people, so perhaps it's the warmongering US military-industrial complex whose business model you want to support? "China will sink without any support from the world. It is an import export economy." China is addressing this problem by attempting to boost domestic spending. The USA has 300 million consumers, but if China can transform our 1.4 billion population into consumers ourselves, then China would be the largest market in the world (if we aren't already) Additionally, China is investing into self-sufficiency such as developing our own domestic chips instead of relying on imports. "You are costing China lots of money by your attitude. good luck with your lies and China's success." No, I'm helping China by debunking lies that you spread (such as Peng Shuai's allegations of sexual assault, when she never said such a thing in her post.) I've also debunked your claims of Bridgestone withdrawing from China, when they merely closed 1 out of 2 tire plants in China. I mean, it's as though you believe your own lies, because you appear to inherently want China to fail and you can't stand to see China succeed that's all, that's the source of your resentment towards China. "I'm out and feel I should support better people." You never actually supported me in the first place at all, so it's of no loss to me. "I 1005 support the Boycott for the Olympics, especially now after conservations with many Chinese people." Like I said earlier, how do you proof that the people you're talking to are Chinese people? And if you support 100% boycott of Beijing Olympics, that means your country shouldn't send their athletes either, so go ahead and tell Canadian athletes not to participate. More gold medals for China then. "I lost a lot of respect for China. 3 years ago I was proud to have spend time in China. Now I am embarrassed to say I was even there." China doesn't really care what you think about our country. You had the opportunity to visit China and talk to local people and formed your opinion, yet after you leave, you have no proof that you're even talking to Chinese online. China doesn't need this sort of "ambassador" like you, who spew unproven lies (like just googling "countries that left China" that's all) and label Chinese as judgemental and racist without proof.
    1
  16070.  @bradlys4978  The problem with you quoting Western media is that oftentimes it's unregulated and unverified. Nowadays, almost anyone can put on a journalist cap and film whatever they want, and audiences just gobble up the news. Whereas in China, the media is regulated to weed out fake news and they quote data and statistics from primary sources.
    1
  16071. More expensive U.S knife too.
    1
  16072. Justin Watson Which country has USA actually conquered then? Iraq? Afghanistan? Vietnam? Korea?
    1
  16073. LesterTheMolestor Why are you being so rude here? All you seem to do is redirect blame at other things like ROE for America's military failures. Doesn't change the fact that America did not win in Vietnam or defeat North Korea in Korean war. And how much oil did America actually take from the Middle East through those wars with them?
    1
  16074.  @uponreflection7336  So Trump banned travel from China, then why is USA the epicentre of Covid-19 with over 400,000 cases and 14,000 deaths?
    1
  16075.  Every Word Is A Made-Up Word  China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China bought the West time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    1
  16076.  @uponreflection7336  That's because there was no actual indication of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus back in 2019. This is a new virus strain so you think people automatically know everything about Covid-19? The first human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus in China was confirmed only on 20th Jan 2020 and that's when the government began implementing quarantine measures shortly after. Source: China confirms first human-to-human transmission of virus; 3 dead, over 225 infected msn.com/en-in/news/world/china-confirms-first-human-to-human-transmission-of-virus-3-dead-over-225-infected/ar-BBZ9mxv (Dated to 20th Jan 2020) The government is acting based on actual information gleamed from the ground, not rumours and hearsay.
    1
  16077.  @uponreflection7336  The government rushed to built a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised. Video: Huoshenshan: the hospital built in 10 days in China over coronavirus outbreak youtu.be/l2QfufpwfdY Kudos to the Chinese construction workers who worked hard to build those hospitals. China also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. Video: Time-lapse video shows how Leishenshan hospital completed in 12 days youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk But USA had 3 months to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but did nothing.
    1
  16078.  Every Word Is A Made-Up Word  That's just how the food is prepared isn't it? Look at how foie gras is prepared by forcefeeding goose/duck until its liver swells to several times its normal size. Look at how lobsters are boiled alive every day and nobody complains.
    1
  16079.  @sayhellotopigeon3083  So since lobsters are boiled alive, then what's wrong different culinary practices all over the world? I'm not complaining about seafood freshness, in fact I love fresh seafood so what's wrong different culinary practices?
    1
  16080.  @sayhellotopigeon3083  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  16081.  @sayhellotopigeon3083  Is it morally right to torture a duck/goose by force feeding it until its liver swells to several times its normal size before harvesting? Because that's how foie gras is made. So what's wrong with different culinary practices?
    1
  16082.  @sayhellotopigeon3083  "Then why did Italy not perk up its cases early December?" Maybe Italy didn't know they were under attack from a new coronavirus strain. Maybe it was China that finally detected the emergence of a strange new virus and notified the WHO. Till today, scientists are unsure of the exact place of origin of Covid-19. Chinese scientists have agreed that the coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, it was imported from elsewhere. Source: Coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, Chinese scientists say scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3051981/coronavirus-did-not-originate-wuhan-seafood-market-chinese Analysis of genomic data from 93 samples of the novel coronavirus suggests it was imported from elsewhere.
    1
  16083.  @jackcoolidge8123  How is World Health Organization China centric? Look at 1:40 of the video and it says that USA is the largest contributor to WHO funding. USA contributes about 400 million dollars to WHO, whereas China only contributes about 40 million dollars to WHO, yet Trump is claiming WHO is China biased?
    1
  16084.  t1tacal  "神州 Shenzhou China's fault. China will pay." H1N1 broke out in America and killed many people in the world, because USA did not do anything about it. So why should China pay?
    1
  16085.  t1tacal  China had informed the World Health Organization of mysterious new virus strain on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had isolated the strain and identified it and by 7th Jan, China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. realclearpolitics.com/2020/03/14/china_bought_the_west_time_the_west_squandered_it_504523.html
    1
  16086.  t1tacal  "神州 Shenzhou Me and the rest of the world is all." What makes you think you can speak on behalf of the rest of the world? You're just anti-China that's all.
    1
  16087.  t1tacal  China is donating medical supplies to other countries affected by Covid-19. Video: Jack Ma donates 500,000 coronavirus testing kits and 1,000,000 masks to the US youtu.be/t4it58bem6I Video: Chinese donate half a million masks to Italy to aid coronavirus fight youtu.be/tQQa7RUKXzs Video: Chinese donate 70,000 masks to Japan to aid coronavirus fight youtu.be/cYkYHauUmwo Video: 300,000 China-donated masks arrive in Belgium youtu.be/B0oxcoh9rDo
    1
  16088.  @jackcoolidge8123  Where's your evidence? I've already debunked your thermal imaging on satellites. Source: Debunked: This image doesn't show 'extent of corpse burning in Wuhan' euronews.com/2020/02/13/debunked-this-images-doesn-t-show-extent-of-corpse-burning-in-wuhan
    1
  16089.  @jackcoolidge8123  Your source doesn't say whether the urns were filled or not. And there are people in Wuhan dying everyday because of other causes (cancer, disease, old ages, car accidents, etc) besides Covid-19, so it's not necessarily that these urns are for Covid-19 victims. You just refuse think critically and just blame China because your anti-China that's all.
    1
  16090.  @jackcoolidge8123  China kicked out American journalists, because earlier, the Trump administration imposed new rules on Chinese reporters, including a 100 reporter cap from five state-run media outlets. The outlets had 160 reporters in total, meaning 60 would be sent back to China.
    1
  16091.  @jackcoolidge8123  Source: U.S. says to reduce employees at Chinese media; China hints of response reuters.com/article/us-usa-china-media-state-idUSKBN20P2PR
    1
  16092.  @jackcoolidge8123  In your source, those WSJ journalists were using racist headlines like "China is the real sick man of Asia" The expulsions by China’s Foreign Ministry followed widespread public anger at the headline on the Feb. 3 opinion piece, which referred to China as “the real sick man of Asia.” The ministry and state-media outlets had repeatedly called attention to the headline in statements and posts on social media and had threatened unspecified consequences. “Regrettably, what the WSJ has done so far is nothing but parrying and dodging its responsibility,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said at a daily news briefing Wednesday. “The Chinese people do not welcome those media that speak racially discriminatory language and maliciously slander and attack China.” If that Australian national support racism against China with such a title like "China is the real sick man of Asia" then why should this racist Australian remain in China? Here's the original WSJ headline that started all this. wsj.com/articles/china-is-the-real-sick-man-of-asia-11580773677
    1
  16093.  @jackcoolidge8123  They used a racist term ("Sick Man of Asia") to describe China so why should we tolerate racism against Chinese? And the bat soup coronavirus origins myth have long been debunked by experts. Source: Is bat soup a delicacy in China? We debunk a rumour on the origin of the coronavirus observers.france24.com/en/20200203-china-coronavirus-bat-soup-debunk-videos-viral-palau-indonesia And China expelled 3 journalist because of their racist behaviour, but USA set a a 100 reporter cap from five state-run media outlets. The outlets had 160 reporters in total, meaning 60 would be sent back to China. Source: China expels journalists from multiple US media groups ft.com/content/d689c498-6875-11ea-800d-da70cff6e4d3
    1
  16094.  @jackcoolidge8123  The term "Sick Man of Asia" has eventually evolved to become a racist term against China and Chinese people. Just like how the meaning of the word "g@y" has evolved from to its current derogatory meaning today. And there are so many racially-motivated attacks against Asian Americans (or Asian Canadians, Asian Australians, Asian Europeans, etc) because American politicians like Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo choose to refer to the virus by it's improper name, Chinese virus, instead of its proper name, Covid-19. Video: Asian Americans face discrimination in the wake of the coronavirus youtu.be/t_IyTxRNUYk
    1
  16095.  @jackcoolidge8123  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  16096.  @jackcoolidge8123  Dr Peter Forster, a geneticist at Cambridge University has identified 3 Covid-19 strains (A, B, C) Type-A is believed to have leaped from bats to humans (animal-to-human transmission) and Type-B is mutated from Type-A and found predominantly in China while Type-C is mutated from Type-B and found predominantly outside China, in places like Singapore. Video: No proof that Covid-19 originated in Wuhan: Peter Forster youtu.be/AQQf2yoymu0 The interesting thing is that the Europe and America suffer predominantly from Type-A virus (animal-to-human transmission) and Type-A is predominantly found outside East Asia, in Europeans and Americans. Source: Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes pnas.org/content/early/2020/04/07/2004999117 which we have named A, B, and C, with A being the ancestral type according to the bat outgroup coronavirus. The A and C types are found in significant proportions outside East Asia, that is, in Europeans and Americans. In contrast, the B type is the most common type in East Asia.
    1
  16097.  @MetalheadAndNerd  "神州 Shenzhou You act as if the Chinese government cared about normal people" He's a well-connected communist member and a property tycoon to boot. How's he a normal person?
    1
  16098.  @Notorious_biggest  Where's your evidence that he's missing, when he is being investigated by the authorities in China?
    1
  16099.  @Notorious_biggest  Where's your evidence that he's missing?
    1
  16100.  @Notorious_biggest  I already showed you that he's being investigated, so where's your evidence that he's missing?
    1
  16101.  @Notorious_biggest  You can't produce any evidence of him being missing? Then looks like you lost the argument.
    1
  16102.  @minzcha5937  If he's missing then how why is he under investigation by the government? How can Chinese government investigate a "missing" person you tell me?
    1
  16103.  @Notorious_biggest  Here's a look inside Chinese BYD mask factory producing 5,000,000 masks a day. Video: China: Factory produces 5 million masks a day in bid to supply shortfall youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw?t=17
    1
  16104.  @Notorious_biggest  This factory in the eastern Chinese city of Rizhao (日照) has been busy pumping out 3,000,000 masks a day. Video: Inside China's Biggest Mask Factory youtu.be/Gc074FxOBA4?t=11
    1
  16105.  @Notorious_biggest  Technological innovation has enabled a company in Guangdong to produce 1,000 face masks in one minute. Video: Ultra-high-speed Mask Production Line Put into Use in south China City youtube.com/watch?v=_jWt-4YKBq4
    1
  16106.  @Notorious_biggest  Video: Positive Vibes | 1,000 masks per minute: World's fastest mask-making machine now in operation youtu.be/8zrs4MYgMBc The world's fastest mask making machine was put into operation producing 1,000 protective masks per minute. It's expected to produce more than 1.2 million masks daily with the machine running round the clock.
    1
  16107.  @Notorious_biggest  Orders for ventilators are pouring in and China is working 24/7 making ventilators. Video: China is working 24/7 to make ventilators youtu.be/kJ81HY_M-zI Ventilators can determine if some Covid-19 patients live or die. Doctors from Italy to the US desperately need them and orders at factories are pouring in. "There's literally no country in the world that doesn't want to buy a ventilator from China right now. We have tens of thousands of orders waiting. The issue is how fast we can make them." - Li Kai, Director of Beijing Aeonmed
    1
  16108.  @Notorious_biggest  Many companies across China have been fully devoted to the production of masks and protective clothing to ensure an adequate supply of necessary materials in the battle against the novel coronavirus epidemic. Video: _Chinese companies speed up protecting clothing production _ youtu.be/yDOPezgxk3A
    1
  16109.  @Notorious_biggest  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  16110. It's like how you are required to input your Date of Birth when creating a new game account, so the company can check your age. The system is still rather new, and there are some possible loopholes in the system, so the government and companies are still ironing out the kinks.
    1
  16111.  @yslee1401  Like I said earlier, of course this is still not enough and China's poverty alleviation efforts are still ongoing until everyone in China is lifted out of poverty. I mean, China is home to 1.4 billion people and it's certainly no easy feat to lift everyone out of poverty. But it appears you just don't want to see China succeed that's all.
    1
  16112.  @yslee1401  How many mainland Chinese call mainland China home? Over 1.4 billion, meaning that 3 million in USA make up less than 0.01% of China's population. Also, the USA is an immigrant nation, meaning that it has loose immigration criteria. As long as a foreigner has a family member or relative who is an American citizen, then he or she is eligible for US citizenship. That's why there are Chinese who marry American just to attain US citizenship, so that they can bring their families over (much to the disgruntlement of the local Americans). In fact, mass immigration creates its own social problems in USA, as the local Americans feel their populations are being displaced by foreigners who refuse to "integrate" into traditional American society. Immigration Whereas China has no real need for immigrants. China already has such a huge population, why would China need more people? China don't need any more foreign workers, we already have plenty of local workers. That's why China has a strict immigration criteria. Also, why attract Westerners from USA, UK, Canada, Australia, NZ? Different culture and different language will create social problems as well as difficulty in them fitting into China. Instead, China is attracting overseas Chinese to return to their homeland, bringing with them the knowledge they learned from overseas. Having the same culture and same language means that overseas Chinese have an easier time integrating back into Chinese culture, than say Westerners. See the difference between Western and Chinese immigration policy?
    1
  16113.  @yslee1401  "if China is so great, why would the rich ones migrate out?" Who says they're migrating out? According to the Hurun Global Rich List 2024, China housed the highest number of billionaires worldwide in 2024. In detail, there were 814 billionaires living in China as of January. By comparison, 800 billionaires resided in the United States.
    1
  16114.  @yslee1401  "if China is so great, why would the rich ones migrate out?" Who says they're migrating out? According to the Hurun Global Rich List 2024, China housed the highest number of billionaires worldwide in 2024. In detail, there were 814 billionaires living in China as of January. By comparison, 800 billionaires resided in the United States. You said: "Real Estate in London, Sydney and Vancouver have been heavily skewed due to the influx of mainlanders gobbling up prime properties." Those countries choose to put up their property for sale, then can't mainland Chinese fork out their money to buy those property? Why blame mainland Chinese for purchasing what your countries put up for sale? You said: "And Huawei’s CFO had a mansion in Vancouver, staying there after being arrested with a myriad of Apple products." Meng Wanzhou wasn't planning on staying in Canada, she was transferring planes at Vancouver International Airport en route to Mexico from Hong Kong. Also, Meng Wanzhou was arrested in Canada, even though she did not violate any of Canada's rules. Her rights were violated when the Canadian authorities who forced her to unlock her phone, laptop and devices, which had their contents searched illegally. Furthermore, she wasn't allowed to contact her lawyer to ask for legal advice during her detention.
    1
  16115.  @yslee1401  You said: "Real Estate in London, Sydney and Vancouver have been heavily skewed due to the influx of mainlanders gobbling up prime properties." Those countries choose to put up their property for sale, then can't mainland Chinese fork out their money to buy those property? I thought your countries believed in free market capitalism? You said: "And Huawei’s CFO had a mansion in Vancouver, staying there after being arrested with a myriad of Apple products." Meng Wanzhou wasn't planning on staying in Canada, she was transferring planes at Vancouver International Airport en route to Mexico from Hong Kong. Also, Meng Wanzhou was arrested in Canada, even though she did not violate any of Canada's rules. Her rights were violated when the Canadian authorities who forced her to unlock her phone, laptop and devices, which had their contents searched illegally. Furthermore, she wasn't allowed to contact her lawyer to ask for legal advice during her detention.
    1
  16116.  @hyc1266  I personally think that when a colony is forced to fight for their independence (i.e the Irish, Singapore, even USA) from their colonial masters, they will learn to treasure their hard-won independence, and the process of fighting helps decolonize the people's minds. But if independence was just given to them (like in India, or Hong Kong's return to China) by the colonizers without a fight, then the people retain their colonial mentality, since there was no actual fighting involved. I hope my meaning comes across: it seems fighting for independence helps shake off the colonial mentality, whereas just simply being granted independence without a fight, retains the colonial mentality among the colonized people.
    1
  16117.  @violatedmonkey  There's nothing wrong with the fictional character, Winnie the Pooh, but comparing President Xi Jinping to that character is a racist caricature, because it's comparing an Asian man to a Yellow bear with small eyes.
    1
  16118.  @violatedmonkey  Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China youtu.be/TtduKDpy4oc China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  16119.  @violatedmonkey  The AUKUS deal means that Australia will receive nuclear submarines from the US and the UK, even though Australia is a non-nuclear country and also a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) that forbids the spread of nuclear weapons/technology to non-nuclear states. If Australia wants to become a nuclear country, then they become potential targets for nuclear strikes, that's all. If Australia choose to embark on the path to becoming a nuclear power then naturally, they'll become a target for potential nuclear strikes themselves.
    1
  16120.  @violatedmonkey  China has nuclear submarines and nuclear missiles, because China is a nuclear state whereas Australia isn't. And Australia obtaining nuclear-powered submarines makes it significantly easier for the U.S to equip Australia with nuclear weapons and submarine-launched ballistic missiles when Australia has the submarines. Only nuclear-armed countries have nuclear submarines, and a nuclear submarine is one tasked to launch a second-round nuclear strike in a nuclear war. So Australia acquiring nuclear submarines makes it a potential target for a nuclear strike, and if Australia embarks on the path to nuclear statehood, then it will naturally become a target as well. AUKUS also undermines the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) by exposing a potential loophole where non-nuclear states can purchase nuclear submarine technology potentially acquire access to weapons-grade nuclear materials.
    1
  16121.  @violatedmonkey  About the South China Sea, the North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    1
  16122.  @violatedmonkey  Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou has pleaded "Not Guilty" and the U.S dropped charges against Meng, then how did she admit to her crimes?
    1
  16123.  @andrenogueira5058  Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi, there are ongoing anti-corruption campaigns to deal with corruption within the communist party. More than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption in China, and the campaign netted over 120 high-ranking officials, including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders. But when is the last time a country like the USA had an anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hilary Clinton is corrupt politician, and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his presidential campaign. But after he became president, no further action has been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    1
  16124.  @andrenogueira5058  At least under President Xi there is an anti-corruption crackdown that's resulted in more than 100,000 people being indicted for corruption in China. But when is the last time a country like the USA had an anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hilary Clinton is corrupt politician, and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his presidential campaign. But after he became president, no further action has been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    1
  16125.  @andrenogueira5058  At least under President Xi there is an anti-corruption crackdown that's resulted in more than 100,000 people being indicted for corruption in China. But when is the last time a country like the USA had an anti-corruption campaign of its own?
    1
  16126.  @andrenogueira5058  Americans have never been more divided than they are today, over issues such as abortion, gun control, vaccine mandates, and many more issues. A member of a key CIA advisory panel (Barbara Walter) has said that the U.S is 'closer to civil war' than most would like to believe. You said: "Notably, these tensions are happily fueled by Russians and Chinese - as any tension in the US makes them joyful. Russia and China are permanently spicing things up in any democratic country, it's their way of being "peaceful"." It's actually a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of the West being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiment in the West today towards Russia and China. This combination has resulted in many Americans looking to Russia and China as the cause of America's woes, when it's apparent that it's self-inflicted by the U.S. You said: "As for Chinese corruption I actually do." Could you present your examples of how the anti-corruption crackdowns are actually purges? In fact, many Chinese support the anti-corruption crackdowns because of them targeting officials that have been bribed or abused their power.
    1
  16127.  @andrenogueira5058  So I take it that you have no actual examples of how the anti-corruption crackdowns are actually purges, and you just made the claim based off what Western MSM is telling you? As for corruption in the United States, just look at Hunter Biden's "laptop from hell", and has all the incriminating evidence to put Joe Biden's son behind bars for a long time. Yet the Western Media attention is hardly focused on this blatant example of corruption. You said: "Note: Asia is not China, China is only part of Asia - so don't even try to equate China with Asia, it is a no go." Did I ever stated that? I merely pointed out that the Red Scare/Yellow Peril mindset is fueling Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiment in the West today towards Russia and China. Another point to note is that China literally makes up a huge part of Asia and its the birthplace of East Asian civilization which makes up much of Japanese and Korean culture. You said: "Mostly I'm sorry for those Russians and Chinese suffering under these abominations and their respective mafias." The Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiment in the West literally target Russians and Chinese people ourselves not our respective governments. Russophobia is evident in how Russian tennis players, football club owners, chess players, ballet dancers, musicians, composers, conductors, and other artists, are getting banned in the West. Wimbledon Stadium even banned all Russian and Belorussian athletes from participating in its competitions. Sinophobia is evident in the rise in hate crimes in the West. being committed against those of Asian descent, including Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, etc. In some cases, the increase of such incidents rose by 300% And mind you, this is phobia is directed against ordinary people who are Russians/Belorussian and Chinese/other Asians living in the West, not against the respective governments of Russia and China.
    1
  16128.  @andrenogueira5058  China's propaganda is clearly lacking and doesn't hold a candle to that of the West. Many people have a hard time believing what comes out of Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV, even though they actually cite date and statistics from primary sources. Whereas Western propaganda is very effective. Almost everyone blindly believe whatever Western MSM like BBC, CNN, Fox News, etc says about China, even though it's oftentimes unsubstantiated by fact. But if you want to look at statistics, a survey by Harvard University and Ash Center has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86% to 93% between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. ... Source: China Daily: Harvard survey finds Chinese satisfaction with govt rises That's because under the Communist party, China has since transformed from a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China products) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military expenditure. You said: "That is exactly what China and Russia are experimenting:" Before the 1917 communist revolution, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe at that time, with agriculture providing the livelihood for 80% of the population and was dominated by peasants, whose traditional household economies were extremely inefficient compared to agriculture in Western Europe or the United States. Only about 15% of the population lived in towns, and fewer than 10% worked in industry. Russia was also technologically backward and lagged far behind advanced capitalist countries like Great Britain and Germany. But after the 1917 Bolshevik revolution, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe at that time, both economically as well as militarily (that's why NATO was formed in response to rising Soviet Union might). The Soviet Union was the world's 2nd largest economy from 1960 to 1985, and the Soviets made various contributions to science and technology during its hey day. Such an ideology that transformed pre-1917 Russia from arguably Europe's poorest country into its strongest as the Soviet Union. Yet you just denounce this ideology without attempting to understand its success?
    1
  16129.  @andrenogueira5058  "神州 Shenzhou Let me tell you about those "phobias"." I don't know how you can somehow attribute the Red Scare and Yellow Peril mindset in the West as somehow being the work of Chinese. Russophobia in the West is banning Russian tennis players, football club owners, chess players, ballet dancers, musicians, composers, conductors, and other other artists, just for being Russian. Even Wimbledon banned Russian athletes just for being Russian. Same thing with the anti-Asian hate crimes against Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese, etc in the West, they are being targeted base on their race. That's why I find it funny you accuse me of saying Asia is China, when it's basically Westerners that regard all Asians as Chinese when they commit such hate crimes. And mind you, these are ordinary Russians/Belarussian and Chinese/other Asians, not the governments of our respective countries.
    1
  16130.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "Of course what the party doesn't say is that for half a century the party's mismanagement and failed policies were the main cause for poverty and even famine." Mao Zedong didn't murder those people, they starved to death because of the Great Chinese Famine, which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    1
  16131.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "1. Chinese regime showed its true colors, down-playing internal repression and doubling up on external aggressiveness - undermining the free-world societies, threatening them, attempting to corrupt and pervert them." China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    1
  16132.  @andrenogueira5058  "2. In the process, it ruins its own economy, sending millions of Chinese citizens backwards." Poverty alleviation has been the forefront of communist party polices. According to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty; China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to 0.7% in 2015, as measured by the percentage of people living on the equivalent of US$1.90 or less per day in 2011 purchasing price parity terms, which still stands in 2022. ... Source: Wikipedia: Poverty in China Granted, some people may be facing economic difficult and risk slipping back into poverty, but measures are being taken to prevent that. Xu Jianmin, an official from the National Rural Revitalization Administration, said that up to now, 65% of those monitored have eliminated the risk of returning to poverty, and support measures have been implemented to the rest 35%, and the risk of them returning to poverty will be eliminated following a period of hard work.
    1
  16133.  @iknowyoubetter2028  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  16134.  @iknowyoubetter2028  China offered Spain a list of approved Chinese suppliers to buy from, but Spain choose to buy from unapproved company, Bioeasy, which is not on the list of approved suppliers, so why blame China when Spain choose to buy from unapproved company not on the list?
    1
  16135.  @iknowyoubetter2028  Here's a look inside Chinese BYD mask factory. Video: China: Factory produces 5 million masks a day in bid to supply shortfall youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw?t=17
    1
  16136.  @happyhappynuts  Even Indian PM Narendra Modi publicly stated that Chinese troops did not enter Indian territory and no posts were taken. That implies Indian troops must have entered Chinese territory. Source: ‘China did not enter our territory, no posts taken’: PM at all-party meet on Ladakh clash hindustantimes.com/india-news/chinese-troops-did-not-enter-our-territory-says-pm-modi-at-all-party-meeting-on-ladakh-standoff/story-QGgGUyL3sVRYB7mp3Y8bBI.html The Chinese neither entered our territory nor has any post been taken over by them, underscored Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the all-party meet to discuss the border incident along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in eastern Ladakh where 20 Indian soldiers died in the line of duty in brutal hand-to-hand combat with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA).
    1
  16137.  @happyhappynuts  Those are the words of the Indian PM Narendra Modi himself, publicly stating that Chinese troops did not enter Indian territory and no posts were taken, so it must have been Indian troops entering Chinese territory. China is peaceful, but that doesn't mean we let foreigners invade our territory, we will fight back if provoked. Also, Indian Army has stated that 17 Indian troops succumbed to the sub-zero temperatures and high-altitude terrain along the China-India border at Ladakh. In a statement, the army said: "Indian troops who were critically injured in the line of duty at stand-off location and exposed to sub-zero temperatures in the high-altitude terrain have succumbed to their injuries, taking the total that were killed in action to 20. Source: news.sky.com/story/20-indian-soldiers-killed-in-border-clashes-with-china-says-army-12008124 As for the South China Sea, the North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    1
  16138.  @happyhappynuts  Video: China never invade nor colonize other countries or territories. Martin Jacques youtu.be/XDX8nQIEhJY
    1
  16139. Research has shown that a majority of people in China support the Chinese government. A long-term study by Harvard University and Ash Centre has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    1
  16140. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. We are home to ancient monuments like The Great Wall of China, The Grand Canal (World's longest artificial river) The Forbidden City, The First Chinese Emperor's Tomb, The Terracotta Army and many more.
    1
  16141.  @psingh2463  Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous relationship with a much older man has been exposed and she has expressed a desire for personal privacy, but the WTA is demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see.
    1
  16142. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16143. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  16144.  @freeride202  China built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. This makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity, some 856.4 billion kilowatt hours a year – more than double the amount produced by Brazil, in second place. The top three is completed by Canada, which produces 376.7 billion kilowatt hours a year. Source: China produces the most electricity from hydroelectric power weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/
    1
  16145.  Charles Schmidd  You said: "BOYCOTT EVERYTHING CHINA" You should start at home today, gather all your Made-in-China products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, TVs, etc and get rid of them. Also check your products for Made-in-China components and get rid of them.
    1
  16146.  Charles Schmidd  Have you destroyed all your Made-in-China products like smartphones, computers, electronics, TVs, appliances, etc? Even those containing Made-in-China components, especially rare earth metals (of which China controls 90% of all rare earth metals production) found in computer memory, DVDs, hard disks, digital cameras, magnets, lasers, fiber optics, fluorescent lighting, LEDs, flat screen TVs, monitors, rechargeable batteries, solar panels, wind turbines, jet engines, rocket engines, superconductors, etc. Every product ever containing rare earth metals from China, be sure to dispose of them if you want to decouple from China.
    1
  16147.  @mlai2546  That's exactly what the USA accused China of; Of potentially abusing the extradition the now-scrapped Hong Kong Extradition Bill. Yet here we have the USA abusing it's own extradition bill with Canada with Meng Wanzhou. The USA is the one accusing countries of doing things that they themselves are doing, can't you see the hypocrisy of the USA?
    1
  16148.  @mlai2546  So what exactly is Meng Wanzhou's crime? Did Huawei CFO violate US sanctions on Iran? But Canada also violated sanctions with Iran too, yet USA ignore this but target China instead? It's obvious that USA target Huawei in order to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride.
    1
  16149.  @yslee1401  Source: Forbes: No, COVID-19 Coronavirus Was Not Bioengineered. Here’s The Research That Debunks That Idea forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2020/03/17/covid-19-coronavirus-did-not-come-from-a-lab-study-shows-natural-origins/
    1
  16150.  @kanokano3530  Exactly, Meng had her smartphone and devices confiscated at the airport in violation of her rights, and without the Canadian border authorities even telling her about her supposed crime, neither was she shown the arrest warrant. It's a politically motivated attack by USA in order to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride.
    1
  16151.  @kanokano3530  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  16152.  @D1it4FN  "That's why I'm saying you must be wrong. Or if you are right, there must be extenuating circumstances that nullify that section." What sort of circumstances? The USA arm twisting Canada to comply with the extradition? Corruption in the Canadian court system to allow the arrest of Meng Wanzhou when her warrant wasn't even ready yet?
    1
  16153.  @D1it4FN  "神州 Shenzhou I'm actually not aware of her travel itinerary before she was detained in Vancouver." I thought Westerners often boast they have access to all the knowledge in the world. And why did Canada comply with the USA extradition, even though Meng been in Japan and Mexico (US allies which have extradition treaty) and wasn't arrested? The expert they brought to speak said they didn't even know who Meng Wanzhou is, before agreeing to US extradition, it's because Canada did not do their homework on Meng.
    1
  16154.  @D1it4FN  So you're biased against foreigners who come to your country and commit crimes, then did Meng Wanzhou break any Canadian laws while in Canada? Even regarding the HSBC issue, did she commit the so-called crime while she was in Canada? Because even if Meng is accused of lying to a HSBC executive in Hong Kong in August 2013, she did not come to Canada and commit that crime in Canada. What's wrong with Meng Wanzhou being a citizen of China? Are you trying to say that you're against the citizens of China then?
    1
  16155.  @D1it4FN  USA has never been Canada's friend. Look at USA arm twisting Canada to proceed with detaining of Meng Wanzhou, and USA practically ignores Canada after getting you to arrest Meng. You obey USA and what did USA reward you with? Nothing, they just let the case drag on for 2 years, because US plan is to deteriorate Canada-China relations to their current level today and Canada just fall into this trap by USA. The Western "Yellow Peril" mindset never died out. Since 19th century, Westerners have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-liberal democratic country like China eventually surpassing the West someday in the future, is simply too frightening for Westerners to fathom.
    1
  16156.  @yslee1401  Dollar sign? The USA is the country that's weaponizing the US Dollar. Source: Bloomberg: How the U.S. Has Weaponized the Dollar bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-09-06/how-the-u-s-has-made-a-weapon-of-the-dollar
    1
  16157.  @D1it4FN  USA trade war with China is based on jealousy of Apple losing its ranking to Huawei. Because it's not just Huawei that's targeted, even Tik Tok (world's most downloaded app) is getting banned in USA (unless they get bought by US companies) and even WeChat and AliPay are getting targeted by USA, so how's this not US jealousy of Chinese companies success? Source: Forbes: TikTok Is The Most Downloaded App Worldwide, And India Is Leading The Charge forbes.com/sites/rebeccabellan/2020/02/14/tiktok-is-the-most-downloaded-app-worldwide-and-india-is-leading-the-charge/?sh=689f58ec7266
    1
  16158.  @D1it4FN  About Innovation in China, we are world's most populous country, so statistically speaking, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  16159.  @yslee1401  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  16160.  @D1it4FN  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w So which country should you really be afraid of, you tell me? It's like you Canadians are actually blind to the true warmonger of the world.
    1
  16161.  @songsabai3794  Canada arrested Meng Wanzhou first, before China arrested the two Canadians. Canada started this whole mess with Huawei CFO, and they know exactly how to end this stalemate, just release Meng Wanzhou first if they want China to consider releasing the two Canadians. But Canada needs to get the green light from Trump if they want to release Meng, and until then, they are stuck in this trap set by the USA, to deteriorate Canada-China relations until their current levels today.
    1
  16162.  @songsabai3794  Meng has a Hong Kong passport and a mainland passport, because the PRC passport is not as powerful as the HK passport, and travelling with mainland passport is not as convenient as with HK passport, because of the additional need to apply for VISA in certain countries.
    1
  16163.  @D1it4FN  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty and Qing Dynasty and you can see that Tibet is clearly part of Chinese history. Source: Map of Yuan Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/04/yuan.jpg Source: Map of Qing Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/06/f114660d2bf5452994135c4c.gif The Diaoyu Islands were part of China until the Japanese invaded and occupied those islands during the war. After Japanese WWII surrender, Japan signed a treaty to relinquish all their occupied territory, yet the Diaoyu Islands weren't returned to their rightful owner. Go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  16164.  @D1it4FN  About the South China Sea, the North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. Here is the note: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that? And Canada has seen many of its children killed within it's borders. Many of the aboriginals in Canada have been killed by Anglo-Saxon. Source: Decades of missing Indigenous women a 'Canadian genocide' – leaked report theguardian.com/world/2019/may/31/canada-missing-indigenous-women-cultural-genocide-government-report “We do know that thousands of Indigenous women, girls and 2SLGBTQQIA (two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered, queer, questioning, intersex and asexual) people have been lost to the Canadian genocide to date,” said the report.
    1
  16165.  @D1it4FN  About infrastructure in China, China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    1
  16166.  @D1it4FN  Many Chinese citizens warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors just ask the expats like Gweilo 60, Barrett, Daniel Dumbrill, Blondie in China, Alex Absolute, Cyrus Janssen, about how Chinese welcome foreigners to our lands as visitors. But many Westerners regard Chinese in their lands with suspicion and treat Chinese citizens like enemies. I mean, look at you for example, hating Meng Wanzhou because she's Chinese. You admitted that you're biased against Meng because you said (and I quote your words) "Moreover, she is a citizen of China. That makes her Chinese. When I speak of her as Chinese, I speak of her as a citizen of China." But what's wrong with being a citizen of China? Yet you act like Canadians have a leg up on citizens of China? You already discriminate against citizens of China, so how is this an advantage?
    1
  16167.  @yslee1401  Just ask the expats living in China (like Gweilo 60, Barrett, Daniel Dumbrill, Nathan Rich, Alex Absolute, JaYoe Nation,) how many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors. But anti-China sentiment is growing in the West, and many Westerners are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands with suspicion and making Chinese unwelcome in the West.
    1
  16168.  @D1it4FN  China treats native Tibetans far better than Canada treats Aboriginals. Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    1
  16169.  @D1it4FN  The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Source: Seventeen Point Agreement wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Look at the Map of China and Tibet Autonomous Region is clearly part of China, where's your imaginary line separating Tibet from the rest of China?
    1
  16170.  @D1it4FN  You claimed Taiwan is independent then where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? If not then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  16171.  @D1it4FN  "Taiwan claims independence." Could you show me where does Taiwan claim independence? Where is Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? If not, then since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  16172.  @D1it4FN  You said: "I could not find a map with Tibet on it." But earlier you said: " 神州 Shenzhou funny, I look at a map can I see Tibet with a line around it that represents a border. Beside that line I see the word China." so aren't you contradicting yourself here?
    1
  16173.  @brennencox516  Previously, Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region used to be plagued by terrorist attacks perpetrated by misguided Ughurs such as the 1992 Ürümqi bombings, the 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings, the 2010 Aksu bombing, the 2011 Hotan attack, 2011 Kashgar attacks, and the 2014 Ürümqi attack Source: 1992 Ürümqi bombings wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_bombings Source: 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings wikipedia.org/wiki/1997_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_bus_bombings Source: 2010 Aksu bombing wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Aksu_bombing Source: 2011 Hotan attack wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Hotan_attack Source: 2011 Kashgar attacks wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Kashgar_attacks Source: April 2014 Ürümqi attack wikipedia.org/wiki/April_2014_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_attack But thanks to the government program in Xinjiang, there have been no more terrorist attacks in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region since.
    1
  16174.  @D1it4FN  You said: "If you Google map of Asia you will not find Tibet on it." That means under international laws, countries have accepted that the Tibet Autonomous Region is part of China, so what seems to be the problem? I mean, isn't California part of the United States? Then why is the idea of Tibet being part of China so unfathomable to you Westerners? Look, even the Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet, so there's this legally binding agreement showing that Tibet is part of China.
    1
  16175.  @yslee1401  Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  16176.  @D1it4FN  According to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid. "Their feeling of duress derives from the general Chinese threat to use military force again in Central Tibet if an agreement was not concluded. However, according to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid." - Tibetologist Melvyn Goldstein. Source: Seventeen Point Agreement wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement#Repudiation_of_the_agreement
    1
  16177.  @D1it4FN  Did you know that the 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and a traitor to his people? The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government (Beijing). Declassified CIA files have exposed that a total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) Source: CIA Tibetan program wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Costs So here we have concrete evidence that the 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the USA to engage in separatist activities against the Central People's Government.
    1
  16178.  @D1it4FN  China has even launched space stations into orbit, the world's 3rd to do so after USA and USSR. China's first prototype space station, Tiangong-1 was launched in 2011, followed by Tiangong-2 in 2016. There was even a "space lecture" where Chinese taikonaut in space gave a lecture to her students on the ground from onboard Tiangong-1, demonstrating simple micro-gravity experiments in space. Video: Chinese teacher in space gives lecture to her students on the ground below youtu.be/OUAuZnpoZ58 By doing this, we are showing our kids (and future generations of Chinese) that China is both ancient civilization as well as a modern space nation, capable of achieving equally impressive feats as the Westerners in space. China is no longer the sick man of Asia, in fact, China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, and India have not launched space stations of their own into orbit.
    1
  16179.  Narglar Wing  But you Canadians literally put up your lands for sale to Chinese buyers, then why can't Chinese buyers purchase those property legally? Chinese buyers fork out our hard-earned money to pay for the purchase of real estate in Canada, because Canada allows it, so why blame Chinese buyers for buying lands that are for sale?
    1
  16180.  @kanokano3530  These people like Narglar Wing, he blames Chinese buyers, but not American buyers when they buy up Canadian property (which they put their land for sale) yet he still calls me a Chinese ultra nationalist, yet he ignores the Americans buying Canadian property.
    1
  16181.  @D1it4FN  Here's video of Canadian tourist visit to Lhasa and he took the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) and explains how each carriage comes equipped with its own emergency oxygen tank. Video: Welcome to Lhasa - Exploring the City (By Vafa Anderson) youtu.be/J-TfN56ETVM He remarks how much Lhasa has changed in 10 years since he last visited. Throughout the video you can see many religious people worshipping, praying, spinning those "prayer wheels" and performing full-body kowtows on the ground.
    1
  16182.  @D1it4FN  Here's a video of Tibetan singer Alan (阿兰) singing in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese. Video: alan 阿蘭(阿兰) - 青藏高原 Tibetan Plateau 藏/中文版 Tibetan and Chinese version (2020環球綜藝秀) youtu.be/jJfCI3FL9WI
    1
  16183.  @D1it4FN  In 2016, China launched world's 1st quantum satellite, named Micius, (墨子) into orbit and demonstrated that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere, smashing the previous record held on Earth. Video: China's Quantum satellite achieves 'spooky action' at record distance youtube.com/watch?v=4QlcKuxDGrs Quantum entanglement (in a nutshell) is when two subatomic particles become an "entangled pair", able to influence their quantum states (won't go into detail here) seemingly regardless of the distance involved. One particle could be on the surface of the Earth, and the other on the surface of the Moon, and theoretically, they can still influence each other with no information (known to current science) passing in between them. The longest record for quantum entanglement on Earth is 143 km in at experiment in the Canary Islands. But China has allowed two stations (Delingha and Lijiang station) located 1200 km apart to communicate directly, through our quantum satellite, thus breaking the previous record and showcasing that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere. And as far as I know, this is a world first, and China is the first to launch quantum satellite into space.
    1
  16184.  @yslee1401  China is helping build infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, ports, airports, etc in African countries. China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  16185.  @yslee1401  Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China youtu.be/TtduKDpy4oc China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  16186.  @yslee1401  About allegations of debt trap, Chinese President Xi Jinping has pledged to waive debts for the least developed African countries that have both high debt burdens and diplomatic ties with China. Speaking at the opening of a summit with African leaders in Beijing, Xi said his country would offer an extra $US60 billion ($83 billion) in financing to African countries. Source: China waives debt, promises 'no imposition of will' on African nations smh.com.au/world/asia/china-waives-debt-promises-no-imposition-of-will-on-african-nations-20180904-p501nr.html "In addition, for Africa's least developed countries, heavily indebted and poor countries, landlocked developing countries and small island developing countries that have diplomatic relations with China, the debt they have incurred in the form of interest-free Chinese government loans due to mature by the end of 2018 will be exempted," Xi said.
    1
  16187.  @yslee1401  So it's like nothing China does is ever good in your biased eyes? Why can't China offer our Covid-19 vaccines to developing countries? It's not like Western countries are offering their vaccines to help poor countries. Canada even prebought enough vaccines for 5-7 times its population. Imagine 1 Canadian having 5 vaccines, whereas elsewhere, 10 Africans have to fight for access to 1 vaccine.
    1
  16188.  @yslee1401  Great before Puyi? During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  16189.  @yslee1401  So why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, as well as strengthened the communist party support and their right to rule over the mainland.
    1
  16190.  @yslee1401  Singapore has been governed by authoritarian single-party PAP for their entire life as a nation. For 55 years, the People's Action Party ruled Singapore with an iron fist, and Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore's founder) was a dictator who tolerated no dissent and jailed or exiled dissidents (like Francis Seow) or political rivals. But under the PAP, Singapore transformed from sleepy fishing village nation into a world class city today. Because they were under authoritarian single-party PAP rule for 55 years. Doesn't that sound similar to how China has been under Communist Party rule for 71 years?
    1
  16191. @Tenzin Dhondup The population of Tibetans in China actually tripled in size, from 2 million in 1953 to 6 million in 2010. Population of Tibetans in China from 1954 to 2010 1953: 2,775,622 1964: 2,501,174 1982: 3,821,950 1990: 4,593,072 2000: 5,416,021 2010: 6,282,187 ... Even the population of Uighurs in China tripled from 3 million in 1953 to 10 million in 2010. Population of Uighurs in China from 1954 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 ... Source:https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  16192. @Tenzin Dhondup Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo (By WildFilmsIndia)
    1
  16193. Putin's de-Nazification of Ukraine was never about Jews, even Putin never mentioned anything about Jews, it's because of the rise of ultra-nationalists and neo-Nazis like the Azov Battalion in Ukraine Army, that's been genociding ethnic Russians living in Donetsk and Luhansk by shelling those regions for 8 years since the 2014 coup of Ukraine's president by USA and NATO. But Western MSM response to Putin's de-Nazification is to link it to Jews, when it was never about Jews, it's about the genocide of ethnic Russians in those two regions.
    1
  16194. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16195. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16196. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  16197.  @bartonlee3594  To make up for the falling birth rate, China is investing heavily in robotics and automation. In fact, China is already the biggest market for automation, ensuring that China's economy will remain competitive even if the population declines.
    1
  16198.  @bartonlee3594  This is not the first time that the CIA has intervened in the internal affairs of other countries. Take the 14th Dalai Lama for example, he accepted US money to carry out separatist activities in Tibet Autonomous Region. Declassified files has revealed that a total of 1,735,000 US dollars (equivalent to $17,044,700 in 2023) was devoted to the Tibetan program in 1964.
    1
  16199.  @bartonlee3594  "Shenzhou. I was giving you credit for posting that list." You said the list "was/is very priscient" meaning that whatever was written did came true eventually. It didn't.
    1
  16200.  @bartonlee3594  Navalny was in poor health condition and died of a blood clot, where's your proof that he was deliberately killed? Otherwise it appears that you're just hurling accusations without proof. He was actually due to be exchanged with the US for Russian prisoners in that prisoner swap deal that took place between US and Russia, so why would he be deliberately killed like you been claiming?
    1
  16201.  @bartonlee3594  About "begging" for North Korean munitions, didn't the US literally asked South Korea to lend 500,000 artillery shells in support of Ukraine? And while it was Russia that decided to use the strategy of attrition, the conflict in Ukraine actually began in 2014 with the war in Donbass, in which the UN figures estimated some 14,000 people were killed in Donetsk and Lughansk. No wonder why the two republics later voted to join the Russian Federation (as did Crimea in 2014)
    1
  16202.  @bartonlee3594  As I've stated, Navalny wasn't even popular among Russians. According to Levada Center, the number of those who approve of Navalny has also fallen, from 20% in 2020-2021 to 9% in January 2023, while 57% disapproved of his activities, and 23% had never heard of him.
    1
  16203.  @bartonlee3594  Families in China will obviously still have children, but like I said, the falling birth rate can be made up for with China's huge investment into robotics and automation. Automation of Chinese factories will help ensure that China remains a competitive manufacturing hub to rival India's huge population size in the future.
    1
  16204.  @bartonlee3594  Shanghai's home ownership rate is around 67.47%. For comparison, the United State's home ownership rate is 65.6%, so Shanghai's home ownership rate is higher than the entirety of the USA. Also, Shanghai is just one city in China, and young people can always apply for houses in other less expensive Chinese cities like Chengdu, Chongqing, Hangzhou, Wuhan, etc.
    1
  16205.  @bartonlee3594  Instead of forcing people to answer a Yes/no question, why don't you show me proof that he was deliberately killed? As I've stated, Navalny died of blood clot, and he wasn't even popular among Russians, with a survey result indicating 9% approve, 57% disapprove, and 23% had never heard of him. Navalny was also supposed to be exchanged with US for Russian prisoners in that prison swap deal between US and Russia, so if anything, he was far more useful alive.
    1
  16206.  @bartonlee3594  Instead of forcing people to answer a Yes/no question, why don't you show me proof that he was deliberately killed? As I've stated, Navalny died of blood clot, and he wasn't even popular among Russians, with a survey result indicating 9% approve, 57% disapprove, and 23% had never heard of him.
    1
  16207.  @bartonlee3594  Show me evidence that Putin had a hand in killing him first. Otherwise, you're just hurling accusations without proof, and expecting Yes/no answers for complex situation.
    1
  16208.  @bartonlee3594  Robots are the answer to China's manufacturing woes. And as I've stated, families will continue to have children regardless. Isn't the reason you brought up China's falling birthrate is to compare it to India's economy? I've already answered that China's investment in automation and robotics will make up for this.
    1
  16209.  @bartonlee3594  "Ask any young person who is not rich if they can afford to buy a property in Shanghai." Of course a young person who's not rich will have difficulty buying property in the big cities, be it Shanghai or New York, what's the point of your question? But it doesn't mean that that same young poor person can't afford houses in other less expensive Chinese cities like Chengdu, Chongqing, Hangzhou, Wuhan, etc.
    1
  16210.  @bartonlee3594  Russia did not start the war. The conflict in Ukraine began in 2014 with the Maiidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) to overthrow the pro-Russian Ukraine leader Viktor Yanukovych. The next day, the Ukrainian parliament voted to remove Yanukovych from office by 328 lawmakers to 0 (about 73% of the parliament's 450 members). But according to Ukraine's constitution, a three-fourths majority vote is needed (i.e 338 lawmakers to make 75%) so the removal of Yanukovych was illegal according to Ukraine's constitution. Protests against the coup began in Donetsk and Lughansk and Crimea also did not want to be a part of this new Ukraine, so Crimea held a referendum in which an overwhelming majority (96%) voted to join the Russian Federation. For the next 8 years, Ukrainian forces continued to shell the Donbas region, resulting in an estimated 14,000 killed in Donbas. In 2022, Russia recognized Donetsk and Lughansk as independent republics and intervened to defend the two republics.
    1
  16211.  @bartonlee3594  MH17 was downed over eastern Ukraine where the Donbas war had been ongoing since 2014. The place was a warzone, yet Ukraine was allowing civilian aircraft to fly over the airspace over eastern Ukraine. Also, there are no fragments of any Buk missile debris (such as the missile engine for example) found at the scene. Eyewitness on the ground did not observe the characteristic vapor trails left by Buk missiles flying through the air, but they did heard the loud noise of a fighter jet in the sky. It's possible that MH17 was hit by an air-to-aid missile fired from a Ukrainian jet fighter.
    1
  16212.  @bartonlee3594  Censorship clearly exists in the America/Europe Internet. Even on YouTube, a number of your comments here have been shadowbanned already.
    1
  16213. ​ @bartonlee3594  Historically, Ukraine's territory has contested, divided, and ruled by a variety of external powers for the past 600 years, including the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, the Austrian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Tsardom of Russia and lastly the Soviet Union. In fact, the name Ukraine is derived from the old Slavic term for 'borderland' as is the word krajina. Crimea oblast was actually Russian territory but was transferred to Ukraine to commemorate the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's entry into the Soviet Union. When Ukraine gained independence in 1991 with the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Crimea wanted to be granted more autonomy instead of being part of Ukraine. Crimea shared far more historical roots with Russia than with Ukraine, and after the Maiidan Revolution in 2014 (orchestrated by the US), Crimea wanted no part of it and held a referendum in which the overwhelming majority (96%) voted to join the Russian Federation. The central Ukraine government opposed this and for the next 8 years, Ukrainian forces continued to shell the Donbas region, resulting in an estimated 14,000 killed in Donbas. In 2022, Russia recognized Donetsk and Lughansk as independent republics and intervened to defend the two republics.
    1
  16214.  @bartonlee3594  So you're claiming Russia is in trouble for going to North Korea for munitions, then what about the US lending 500,000 rounds of artillery shells from South Korea?
    1
  16215.  @bartonlee3594  "No one is taught about that in the schools. Same with the cultural revolution." Have you ever attended school in China? Even Baidu has entries for the The Great Leap Forward (大跃进) and The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution (文化大革命) who said these aren't taught in school?
    1
  16216. Hong Kong was once a prosperous port city under authoritarian British colonial rule (while the mainland was still poor in the past) but today, fortunes have reversed and Hong Kong has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan, as well as facing increasing levels of competition from other upcoming mainland port cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports Source: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage#2012%E2%80%932017 And that's despite mainland port cities being under the rule of the communist party, whereas Hong Kong is suffering under democracy. No wonder why the people of Hong Kong fear that they are slowly being left behind as mainland cities start surpassing Hong Kong.
    1
  16217.  @intothewrx  So how exactly did China not honor the two systems? Previously, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the time of the 1997 handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leader. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    1
  16218.  @intothewrx  The Hong Kong extradition bill was proposed because of a certain incident. A Hong Kong guy named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, and stuff her body in her suitcase, before flying back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice for his crime, but Hong Kong has no extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. Source: The Murder Case That Lit the Fuse in Hong Kong nytimes.com/2019/06/15/world/asia/hong-kong-murder-taiwan-extradition.html That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to Hong Kong extradition laws. Do the HK protestors even know what they are protesting for? Have they read the bill and understood its contents in their entirety?
    1
  16219.  @rufanuf1  About "stealing ideas", it's not as though Chinese have never invented anything of our own. Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions which have revolutionized the world we live in. Paper and Printing have made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge much easier. The Compass has made navigation through bad weather conditions much easier. And Gunpowder has made a huge impact on the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions?
    1
  16220.  @rufanuf1  About "stealing ideas", it's not as though Chinese have never invented anything of our own. Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (Paper, Printing, Compass, Gunpowder )which have revolutionized the world we live in. But do Chinese complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions?
    1
  16221.  @rufanuf1  You said the Egyptians were using papyrus long before China existed, but today the world is using paper not papyrus. And it appears that you look down on Chinese inventions, claiming that _ "it was going to be discovered regardless,"_ then why didn't Anglo Saxons invented the compass then? And Chinese used gunpowder for making fireworks (that America uses to celebrates every 4th of July).
    1
  16222.  @criteriumprovidus4360  You said: "But why don't you explain the "Twain miracle" or the Hong Kong "miracle" afraid to admit that it was due to western civilization." Because both the Taiwan Miracle and Hong Kong Miracle were the result of authoritarian rule, not Western-style democracy. Previously while Hong Kong still a British colony, Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and the people of Hong Kong did not vote for their leaders. Only during the period of Hong Kong's handover, did Hong Kong people finally get to vote for their favorite leaders, under the One Country Two Systems policy set forth by China. Before that, Hong Kong sure as hell was under the authoritarian colonial rule of British for at least 200 years. Yet Hong Kong flourished as a prosperous port city under such authoritarian rule. (As for the Taiwan Miracle, I've elaborated in detail how this was achieved under the authoritarian single party rule of KMT, not because of Western-style democracy.)
    1
  16223.  @criteriumprovidus4360  You said: "because something last for a very long time it doesn't mean that is necessarily good - Human civilization has advanced more in the last 100 years than all civilizations combined." Western-style democracy actually has a history of failure. For example, Athenian democracy failed. Spartan democracy failed. Greek democracy failed, and even the Republic of Rome eventually crumbled. These early prototypes of democracy weren't successful, and democracy itself wasn't even popular outside of Greece, and didn't spread throughout the rest of the ancient world. Modern liberal democracy only has around 100-200 years of history, and is not guaranteed to be successful long-term. Whereas China has 5,000 years of history in which a strong central government (i.e the Emperor and the Imperial Court) ruled, so why should China abandon our political system that works and adopt Western style democracy? It's rather short-sighted to only take the last 100-200 years of human history and ignore the past 1000-2000 years of human history.
    1
  16224.  @rufanuf1  "神州 Shenzhou Numerous times now you have revealed your ignorance to me" How have I done that? I've, gone into China's 5,000 years of history, being ruled by a strong central government (i.e Emperor and Imperial Court) and how this is Chinese Heritage as represented by the current Chinese government. I've pointed out how Taiwan had flourished under the authoritarian single-party KMT, and only after democracy was introduced, did Taiwan's economic growth slowed. Meanwhile, you yourself admitted that you "were not taught the intricacies of Chinese history at school." so who is revealing their ignorance here?
    1
  16225.  @rufanuf1  You said: "I don't look down on anyone based on their race." Throughout this whole comment thread, you've made numerous disparaging remarks regarding Chinese people and our inventions. It appears you've never even heard of the Four Great Inventions of China, yet you're claiming that I'm revealing my ignorance? You said: "I realize that China are excelling in some areas (drones for example) but still not "their" invention." Ancient China made use of unmanned aerial vehicles such as the Sky Lanterns (also known as Kongming Lanterns) which was mankind's first hot air balloon, from as early as the 3rd century BC.
    1
  16226.  @rufanuf1  You said: "the mindset of communism, which has demonstrated itself to limit innovation and creativity throughout human history" Are you serious? The Soviet Union invented and launched the world's first satellite, Sputnik-1. The first man in space was Soviet cosmonaut, Yuri Gagarin on board Vostok-1. The USSR even launched the world's first space station, Salyut-1. Are you living in some alternative history, that you won't even know of these achievements made by the USSR?
    1
  16227.  @rufanuf1  You said: "My education taught me to be objective and simply observe. You cant learn objectivity from history books." History has so much to teach us, if only we would listen. China has 5,000 years of history and has thus accumulated a wealth of political experience, garnered through various Chinese political literature, governing manuals or military textbooks, on how to best govern a country as populous as China. China has always been ruled by a strong central government (i.e Emperor and Imperial Court) then why should China abandon this system that works for China, and instead adopt Western-style democracy? Even Taiwan Miracle occurred under the authoritarian single-party KMT rule. Even Hong Kong Miracle occurred while Hong Kong was under the authoritarian rule of Britain. You claim to be objective, yet why is it you cannot counter any of my points? Instead you make snide remarks against me for my views? Just because my views differ from yours?
    1
  16228.  @rufanuf1  You said: "90%+ of everyday innovation has come from and out of something called the industrial revolution." Do you actually have data to support your boast? Chinese not only invented paper, but also the paper banknote. Before that, merchants often have to carry excess coinage or precious stones for trading, but with the Chinese invention of the banknote, paper currency started circulating and made its way to the West. (Also, during the Industrial Revolution, the majority of European countries were actually still monarchies, not democracies.)
    1
  16229.  @rufanuf1  "A way of life literally invented by the west and begrudgingly taken up by Russia and the East. Otherwise you would still be farming cabbage by hand." Before 1917, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe at that time. Only about 15 percent of the population lived in towns, and fewer than 10 percent worked in industry. Agriculture provided the livelihood for 80 percent of the population and was dominated by peasants, whose traditional household economies were extremely inefficient compared to agriculture in Western Europe or the United States. Russia was also technologically backwards compared to advanced capitalist countries like Great Britain and Germany. But after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe, both economically and militarily (that's why NATO was formed in response to rising Soviet military might). The USSR was the world's 2nd largest economy from 1960 to 1985. The Soviets also made numerous advances in science and technology, such as launching Sputnik into orbit before the Americans did. Such an ideology that transformed Russia from arguably what was once Europe's poorest country into its strongest as the Soviet Union, and yet you're claiming that the mindset of communism has demonstrated itself to limit innovation and creativity throughout human history?
    1
  16230.  @rufanuf1  You said: "Even the Sputnik example is a poor one, because YES the Russian got there first but only in an event created by the US!" An event? You're referring to the Space Race? Everyone knows the Soviet Union kicked off the Space Race. Public interest in space travel originated in the 1951 publication of a Soviet youth magazine and was promptly picked up by US magazines. Yet you're claiming its the US that created this event? You said: "You can win a race but who created the arena?" Well, aren't people generally more interested in who won the race, rather than who created the arena? And the Space Race arena was literally created by the USSR.
    1
  16231.  @rufanuf1  So I take it that you have no data to support your boasts? I've already gave examples of Chinese inventions like paper, compass, gunpowder, but you just dismiss them. You spoke of the Industrial Revolution, but did you know that ancient Chinese metallurgists invented the blast furnace (500 BC), cupola furnace (403-221 BC), finery forge (300 BC) as well as the puddling process that converted pig iron to wrought iron, long before it was developed in England during the 1780s.
    1
  16232.  @rufanuf1  So I take it that you have no data? I've already gave examples of Chinese inventions like paper, compass, gunpowder, but you just disregard them. You spoke of the Industrial Revolution, but did you know that ancient Chinese metallurgists invented the blast furnace, cupola furnace, finery forge as well as the puddling process that converted pig iron to wrought iron, long before it was developed in England during the 1780s?
    1
  16233.  @rufanuf1  "Shenzou I don't know if your Chinese or not (I don't like to make assumptions) , but you really do need to wake up to your flawed perceptions of global reality." Flawed perceptions of global reality? You're the one claiming that the mindset of communism to have demonstrated itself to limit innovation and creativity throughout human history, yet I've already proven that statement wrong with the Soviet launching Sputnik, Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, Soviet Space Station Salyut, then who is the one with flawed perceptions of global reality here? What objectivity have you demonstrated at all, except to look down on Chinese inventions and Soviet inventions?
    1
  16234.  @rufanuf1  You said: " The world as it is today, civilization as it is today is NOT a product of Chinese Innovation or Chinese culture." Chinese inventions HAVE contributed to global development, such as the Four Great Chinese Inventions, or the Paper banknote, or the blast furnace, and so on, but the fact that you constantly deny Chinese achievements is indication that you're not being objective here. You said: "On the contrary, nearly anything positive that's improved the quality of life on this planet for individuals ANYWHERE came out the west (and particularly the US) domination of the world over the last 200 years." Not more of your unsubstantiated claims. China's poverty alleviation efforts have lifted an unprecedented number of people out of poverty in China. According to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty; China's poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015, as measured by the percentage of people living on the equivalent of US$1.90 or less per day in 2011 purchasing price parity terms, which still stands in 2022.
    1
  16235.  @rufanuf1  You said: "Either way today, and in the most recent generation and in this century, all China has largely been is the worlds factory," With those words, you've just contradicted your earlier claim that (quoting your words): "The world as it is today, civilization as it is today is NOT a product of Chinese Innovation or Chinese culture." The fact that China is the factory of the world, means that Chinese innovation and Chinese culture (especially work culture) is what contributed to global development, then can't you realize your contradictory statements? You said: "That may not be any bad thing, but rest assured China was asleep and may well of stayed asleep if it wasn't for the invitation to the party offered by other developed capitalist nations in the last 50 years or so." What invitation are you talking about?
    1
  16236.  @rufanuf1  You said: "The obvious fear today in the west, is that Chinese rulers (not necessarily it's people,) accepted the invitation to that party with hostile intentions." What invitation are you talking about? If you're talking about China joining the UN, then it's because UN countries democratically voted to recognize the People's Republic of China, and to kick Taiwan out of the UN Security council through voting. Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The UN voted: 76 voted for, 35 voted against, 17 abstained. Since China won the vote with two-thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, and recognized the PRC as China, while kicking the RoC out of the UN Security Council.
    1
  16237.  @rufanuf1  You said: "On the otherhand the way you dress them up as being purely Chinese successes as if China resides alone on this planet I do find amusing." Look who's talking. You're the one boasting that (quoting your own words): "On the contrary, nearly anything positive that's improved the quality of life on this planet for individuals ANYWHERE came out the west (and particularly the US)" so who's the one dressing up as being purely Western successes? It's like you're accusing me of doing what you yourself are doing here. You said: "Its just a shame you cannot recognise the simple fact that in order to do that they have had to COPY western capitalist business models to do so." That's where you are incorrect. China did not copy Western business models. For example, experts agree that China is not a free market, because the Chinese government exerts a degree of control over the market. Also, there are a number of state-owned Chinese companies, so what makes you claim China had copied Western business models? You said: "神州 Shenzhou lol you are funny. Im not in any disagreement with SOME of the facts your stating." Funny how you never actually expressed this feeling.
    1
  16238.  @rufanuf1  You said: "The problem is your poltical have not been persuing those ideas for the benefit of Chinese citizens," How is it not to the benefit of Chinese citizens? Poverty alleviation is at the forefront of Chinese government policy, and Chinese citizens have benefited greatly from the government's economic policy. The quality of life in China has improved so much that recently, studies have shown that Chinese citizens life expectancy is now higher than that of Americans. The US life expectancy at birth is now at 76.1 years, versus 77.1 for China. You said: "you only need to consider the plight of People like Jack Ma too see that." Jack Ma had proposed a deal that would benefit Ant Financial at the cost to ordinary Chinese citizens, so what's wrong when the CPC tries to take him down a notch? Jack Ma was acting in his own interests, not for ordinary Chinese citizens interests.
    1
  16239.  @rufanuf1  I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, but I was appalled at the sheer amount of anti-China sentiment in the West. It's like whenever I bring up China's positive achievements to Westerners, they laughed at me, calling me "indoctrinated" or tell me to "Go back to China if you really like it there". Even though many of these Westerners have never actually set foot inside China and seen what life is like here for themselves. (Granted, not everyone in the West behaved like this, but more are behaving increasingly so.)
    1
  16240.  @rufanuf1  So it appears that both of us are in agreement that yes, all societies ultimately move towards an authoritarian state, then why can't it be assumed that authoritarian forms of government are the norm? It was clearly the norm for the past 1000-2000 years of human history, whereas democracy has only been prominent for the past 100-200 years of human history. Granted, there were earlier "prototype democracies" like in Athens, Sparta, Greece, but even those systems eventually crumbled. The Republic of Rome for example is no longer around, whereas China has 5,000 years of history and has survived the test of time.
    1
  16241.  @rufanuf1  Excuse me, but what's wrong with sharing a holiday resort with 50 Russians? Aren't Russians people as well? Or are you implying that you should have the whole resort to yourself? It's like you're deliberately de-humanizing Russians as non-human, then aren't you being somewhat racist here? And what's wrong with Chinese spitting contests held all over the world? I thought you were all about freedoms yet why is it when Chinese people do things, you take offense against us? I mean, Chinese people are free to travel overseas for study, work and play. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending coin on your tourist industry. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. Yet what makes you think Chinese people aren't free, or are suppressed under the government?
    1
  16242.  @rufanuf1  How have my historical lessons been unscientific? The fact remains that the vast majority of ancient nations adopted authoritarian forms of government (i.e aristocracy, theocracy, monarchy etc) then how's that "cherry picking"? And the Soviet Union made numerous advances to science and technology, with their launching of Sputnik, of Yuri Gagarin being the first man in space, and launching Soviet space station, Salyut, so doesn't this already prove your statement wrong?
    1
  16243.  @rufanuf1  You said: "For example why on Earth should western countries allow property ownership for citizens or companies of nations that do not reciprocate?" For your information, foreigners are allowed to purchase property in China. The essential requirement is that foreigners have to have studied or worked in China for at least one year on a residence permit. Foreigners are allowed to only own one residential property for dwelling purposes in China.
    1
  16244.  @rufanuf1  Also, you claim that the West should "start applying the "eye for eye" "dog eat dog" doctrine of the Chinese" but when has that ever been part of Chinese doctrine? Look at Chinese media, and the Chinese government promotes win-win cooperation which are mutually beneficial. Where did you get the idea that China is about "eye for an eye" and "dog eat dog"? How much do you actually know about Chinese culture?
    1
  16245.  @rufanuf1  What makes you think "authoritarian" governments are one step closer to decay than democratic ones? From what I can gather, Putin enjoys a high approval rating in Russia. In March 2023, over 80 percent of Russians approved of activities of the Russian President Vladimir Putin. Same thing with China. According a long-term study by Harvard University and Ash Center, around 80-90 percent of Chinese citizens support the Chinese government. On the other hand, Western democracies are facing low approval ratings, be it President Biden, Canadian PM Trudeu, French President Macron, German Chancellor Olaf and so on.
    1
  16246.  @rufanuf1  What makes you think "authoritarian" governments are one step closer to decay than democratic ones? From what I can gather, Putin enjoys a high approval rating in Russia. In March 2023, over 80 percent of Russians approved of activities of the Russian President Vladimir Putin. Same thing with China. According a long-term study by Harvard University and Ash Center, around 80-90 percent of Chinese citizens support the Chinese government. Whereas the approval ratings of many Western democracies are at an all time low.
    1
  16247.  @rufanuf1  What makes you think "authoritarian" governments are one step closer to decay than democratic ones? From what I can gather, Putin enjoys a high approval rating in Russia and its the same thing with China. According a long-term study by Harvard University and Ash Center, around 80-90 percent of Chinese citizens support the Chinese government. Whereas the leaders of Western democracies are experiencing low approval from their populations.
    1
  16248.  @rufanuf1  Where I studied English is not important. Western countries adopt the same view towards China and perceive our country as "the enemy", and somehow incapable of governing ourselves, then where does this sense of superiority come from? China has found success having a political system with a strong centralized government, then why is it many Westerners (but not all) are unable to accept China's rise?
    1
  16249.  @rufanuf1  Claiming that authoritarian rule shows a 100% track record of failure (which is false by the way, because monarchies still exist, like for example, Saudi Arabia), doesn't mean that modern democracy will be successful either. If we look at the closest historical approximation to modern democracy, the most famous example is the Republic of Rome, and it too eventually crumbled, so there is no guarantee that democracy will be successful.
    1
  16250.  @rufanuf1  Another point to note is that Western democracies have also started wars, such as the Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Yemen War and so on. Even in 1999, NATO bombed Yugoslavia (even though Yugoslavia did not invade NATO) then why is it that you seemingly overlook wars started by the West? Western democracies are just as capable of starting wars as authoritarian systems.
    1
  16251.  @rufanuf1  So you're saying that US wars in the Middle East are somehow "justified" just because it's not over territorial claim? That the tragic loss of life in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen, is okay, just because it's not over territory grab? Then what "humanitarian reason" are you talking about? Take for example the Iraq War, and according to Iraq Body Count, some 200,000 Iraqi civilians lost their lives as a result of the US war in Iraq. You said: "they are states lead by authoritarian rulers harboring terrorists" If you're referring to Osama bin Laden, he was arrested in Pakistan, not Afghanistan. Furthermore, after his death, the US continued to occupy Afghanistan for 20 years, then what sort of justification is this?
    1
  16252.  @rufanuf1  So you're saying that Western democracies get incompetent leaders because they deserve it? Then why are you continuing to praise such a system that produces such inept leaders in the first place? And it's funny how you hype up the Russia and China as somehow "trying to empire build" when Russia and China are at the most striving only for regional dominance, and it's the US that wants to preserve their global hegemonic status. And you downplay the US's wars, even though you yourself aren't even American.
    1
  16253.  @rufanuf1  So Western democracies get incompetent leaders because they deserve it? Then why are you continuing to praise such a system that produces such inept leaders in the first place? And it's funny how you hype up the Russia and China as somehow "trying to empire build" when it's the US that struggling to maintain its hegemonic rule, through wars in the Middle East (that you conveniently downplay).
    1
  16254.  @rufanuf1  So Western democracies get incompetent leaders because they deserve it? Then why are you continuing to praise such a system that produces such inept leaders in the first place? And it's funny how you hype up the Russia and China as somehow "trying to empire build" when it's the US that's involved in wars in territories from across the Pacific Ocean. And you're not even American yourself, yet you rush to defend the US involvement in wars?
    1
  16255.  @rufanuf1  Why do you keep on claiming Russia and China are "trying to empire build" while overlooking the US involvement in wars across the globe? You're not even American yourself, yet you consistently defend their every involvement in war? And you project on to Russia and China what the US is currently doing?
    1
  16256.  @rufanuf1  The negative consequence of the democratic form of leadership can also be very negative, if the person in power wants war. Didn't US President Bush invade Iraq on suspicion of Iraq harboring weapons of mass destruction? But no WMDs were ever found in Iraq, so it's clear that democratic form of government can result in negative consequences.
    1
  16257.  @rufanuf1  What wonderful thing about democracy? Western democracy has caused wars in the Middle East, of which the US does not take responsibility for, then whats so wonderful about that? Instead, you hype up the potential of Russia and China "trying to empire build" while ignoring the misdeeds of the current hegemon.
    1
  16258.  @rufanuf1  What wonderful thing about democracy? Western democracy has caused wars in the Middle East, of which the US does not take responsibility for, then whats so wonderful about that? Instead, you hype up the potential of Russia and China "trying to empire build" while ignoring what the US is currently doing?
    1
  16259.  @rufanuf1  You said: "Now tell me what the CCP does wrong, has done wrong. Publish it here for the world to see please." China's development has resulted in air-pollution due to over reliance on fossil fuels, which have resulted in smog in our cities. After receiving complaints by citizens, the government built the world's largest hydroelectric power station, the Three Gorges Dam, in order to supply China with clean, renewable energy and to reduce dependence on fossil-fuels. Now that I've said that, could you perhaps say something positive about the CPC?
    1
  16260.  @rufanuf1  What wonderful thing about democracy? Western democracy has caused wars in the Middle East, of which the US does not take responsibility for, then whats so wonderful about that? Instead, you paint Russia and China out to be the enemy here?
    1
  16261.  @rufanuf1  China's development has resulted in air-pollution due to over reliance on fossil fuels, which have resulted in smog in our cities. After receiving complaints by citizens, the government built the world's largest hydroelectric power station, the Three Gorges Dam, in order to supply China with clean, renewable energy and to reduce dependence on fossil-fuels. Now that I've said that, in return could you perhaps say something positive about the CPC?
    1
  16262.  @rufanuf1  China's development has resulted in air-pollution due to over reliance on fossil fuels, which have resulted in smog in our cities. After receiving complaints by citizens, the government built the world's largest hydroelectric power station, the Three Gorges Dam, in order to supply China with clean, renewable energy and to reduce dependence on fossil-fuels.
    1
  16263.  @rufanuf1  One thing that the government has done wrong is to pollute the airs of our cities. But the government is rectifying the problem by investing heavily in electric vehicles. Now that I've said that, in return could you perhaps say something positive about the CPC?
    1
  16264.  @rufanuf1  If you claim that one good thing about Western democracies is the ability to point out mistakes, but if no action is being taken to correct said mistakes, then how exactly is the Western democracy going to evolve? In the West, they've reached a state where they produced incompetent leaders that have no solutions to problems presented to them. All they seem to do is blame China for their own problems.
    1
  16265.  @rufanuf1  If you claim that one good thing about Western democracies is the ability to point out mistakes, but if no action is being taken to correct said mistakes, then how exactly is the Western democracy going to evolve? In the West, they've reached a state where they produced incompetent leaders that have no solutions to problems presented to them. All they seem to do is redirect blame elsewhere.
    1
  16266.  @rufanuf1  It's no secret today that the West is in decline and China is rising. You see it in the everyday news and even you agree that the leaders in the the West are incompetent for their role. Then why is it that you seem to think democracy is the best form of governance?
    1
  16267.  @rufanuf1  If we draw upon the wisdom of history, the West today appears to resemble the Republic of Rome during its decline, with all those incompetent leaders, the decadence and the social and moral decay of Rome. If democracy can fix these problems, why isn't it appearing to do so?
    1
  16268.  @rufanuf1  If we draw upon the wisdom of history, the West today appears to resemble the Republic of Rome during its decline, with all those incompetent leaders, the decadence and the social and moral decay of Rome. Why isn't democracy able to fix this?
    1
  16269.  @rufanuf1  Just look at what Western countries education teach their young kids. Social values are being perverted and conservative norms are being overturn.
    1
  16270.  @rufanuf1  In 19th century, Britain was superpower. In 20th century, the US overtook Britain as a superpower But from 1-1800 AD, China (and also India) was a superpower. Now in the 21st century, China is all set to resume our previous status as a superpower.
    1
  16271.  @rufanuf1  Why is it that many Westerners aren't able to accept the rise of China? China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and look at how far China has come under the leadership of the CPC. Today, China is the world's 2nd largest economy (or the largest if you go by PPP), the world's factory, having strong scientific and engineering basis, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army.
    1
  16272. I can already see the endgame. President Trump eventually have to step down when his term is over, and the next POTUS might just start reversing Trump's policies and lifting the US-China tradewar, thus restoring US-China trade relations to their previous pre-tradewar levels. Meanwhile, President Xi abolished the term limits, so he'll still be guiding China, long after Trump's tariffs are gone.
    1
  16273.  @klhilde  China is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending and catching up fast to the United States. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($451.9 billion) <-- 3. European Union ($379.0 billion) 4. Japan ($165.7 billion) 5. Germany ($118.8 billion) 6. South Korea ($91.6 billion) In the West, researchers offend have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products. How can Hong Kong even hope to compete with the sheer economic might of mainland China?
    1
  16274.  @ThomasRosehands  You said: " You can say you love the country & hate the government in America with no repercussions. We were harassed for doing the same in China" Doing the same by saying you love the country and hate on the government in America? Of course you can. No one will harass you for saying you hate on the government in America while in China. In fact, some people may even agree with you on this.
    1
  16275.  @yslee1401  Sri Lanka's Hambantota port may have been leased to Chinese companies to develop for 99 years. But in 99 years time, the lease would have expired and the port would be returned to Sri Lanka, so Sri Lanka benefits in the long run. Same goes for Pakistan's Gwadar Port, Lao's high-speed railway, and so on. Those infrastructure are literally located in those countries themselves, so how can China take over them?
    1
  16276.  @yslee1401  "in the 5 eye and many advanced European countries, freedom of speech is embedded in the constitution." Why then did the European countries banned RT and Sputnik news? Why was Australian journalist Julian Assange detained in a UK prison just for reporting the truth on the Afghanistan and Iraq war?
    1
  16277.  @ThomasRosehands  "Oh God are Panda Ping proxies this dim... And my conversation is with Han Shen not his proxies." What makes you think I'm somebody's proxy? And why'd you include the term Panda Ping in front of the term? Is it because I am Chinese, so you call me Panda Ping as a racist insult? Also, the conversation first began with me asking you "Were your family promoting separatism in Hong Kong?" so why are you claiming that I'm hijacking the conversation?
    1
  16278. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  16279. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  16280.  @jb3883  "神州 Shenzhou incorrect .. soveit/china atrocities are as common as west, the difference is one can speak in west n killed/imprisoned in the soviet/china" If that's the case, then why is the United States home to the world's largest prison population? And why isn't Julian Assange in jail just for exposing the U.S monitoring activities on its allies?
    1
  16281.  @item6931  "Cyrus Janssen >Putin by far! I gave your post a like!!!! 😊" Well, doesn't this prove that Cyrus is most certainly not paid by the Chinese government then?
    1
  16282.  @item6931  You said: "lmao his post referred to Russia, not China!" It's no secret that Russia-China relations have steadily grown a lot closer since 2022, so if Cyrus were paid by China, then why would he be posting bad things about Russia's President then? You said: "To answer your question you would have to talk to his accountant: I have no idea how he makes his money." Then why do you (and others) keep on insinuating that Cyrus is somehow paid by China? When he clearly includes sponsors in his videos?
    1
  16283.  @item6931  mark yeung's logic here is to employ a false equivalence (or false equivalency) which is an informal fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning.
    1
  16284.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Some Chinese are drug addicted, does it mean I am a drug addicted because I am Chinese???" Once again, another excellent example of the false equivalence fallacy, in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning. Seems like you're an expert in listing out
    1
  16285.  @blimpusa  Anti-China sentiment is growing in Australia, even though Australia is located closer to Asia than America and China is Australia's biggest trading partner. Yet Australian politicians like Scott Morrison are fanning the flames of racism against China and following US's anti-China stance.
    1
  16286.  @blimpusa  You said: "We love our Chinese diaspora here in Australia." Asian-Australians have reported almost 400 racist attacks since the beginning of Covid-19 to the country's leading survey of anti-China racism. The survey has documented 386 racist incidents, including abuse, physical intimidation and spitting. The survey also revealed that roughly 90% of racist incidents were not being reported to police and the vast majority were perpetrated by strangers in public places. Source: Sydney Morning Herald: Almost 400 anti-China attacks since pandemic began smh.com.au/politics/federal/almost-400-anti-china-attacks-since-pandemic-began-20200607-p550a8.html
    1
  16287.  @blimpusa  The survey was conducted by independent progressive thinktank Per Capita, in collaboration with the Asian Australian Alliance and Being Asian Australian and has documented 386 racist incidents, including abuse, physical intimidation and spitting. "There definitely has been an increase," Osmond Chiu said, noting that compared to similar data from the United States, there have been a higher proportion of racist incidents against Asian-Australians than Asian-Americans. The survey also revealed that roughly 90% of racist incidents were not being reported to police and the vast majority were perpetrated by strangers in public places. So just because you don't see anything happening in your neighbourhood, doesn't necessarily imply that racist incidents against Asian-Australians aren't happening.
    1
  16288.  @blimpusa  You said: "We love our Chinese diaspora here in Australia." and I have contributed a survey showing an increase in racist attacks against Asian Australians, so what exactly have you contributed? Nothing, you just ignored the source I provided, while having no source of your own.
    1
  16289. China's reaction to competition = self-improvement. US's reaction to competition = sanction the competition.
    1
  16290.  @MarkYeung1  Where did Ukraine display Russian tank? For your information, Ukraine's army uses Russian Soviet-era tanks.
    1
  16291. Capitalism is what enables rich developed countries to buy up all the vaccines and hoard them, leaving little to none for the developing countries. Communism is the belief that resources should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs (German: Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen)"
    1
  16292.  @camt8804  According to statistics, the number of foreigners entering China in the first half of 2024 leaped by more than 150%, thanks to China extending VISA-free travel to 15 countries, namely Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Malaysia, Switzerland, Ireland, Hungary, Austria, Belgium, Luxmbourg, New Zealand, Australia, and Poland.
    1
  16293.  @davis7428  In the Zheng Xiyuan incident, the protestors illegally entered the Chinese Consulate-General in Manchester and endangered the security of the premises, and he only acted in self-defense. How does this equate to "acting like they are kings and queens"? As for the Brendan Kavanagh incident, what's the name of the Chinese government official?
    1
  16294.  @camt8804  You said: "Wow, it looked from the video like the embassy staff dragged Zheng Xiyuan into the grounds and beat him." Zheng Xiyuan (Chinese: 郑曦原) is a Chinese diplomat who served as the China's Consul General in Manchester. Yet you said he was dragged into the grounds and beaten? It's apparent that you don't really understand the context of the video that you watched, you're just pretending to care in order to portray Chinese consul members in a negative light that's all.
    1
  16295.  @davis7428  Watch the full video footage. Nathan Rich does an excellent analysis of the incident with footage from different angles. Turns out that the protestors rushed to the gate to pull out consulate staff and prevent them from returning to the consulate grounds. Additionally, a consulate security guard wearing a vest and helmet was deliberately tripped by the protestors to the ground, surrounded and repeatedly kicked by the protestors. This footage was not shown in the media, either being zoomed or cropped out to hide the protestor's actions. The protestor with the long hair (named Bob) had entered the consul grounds and was repeatedly punching a consulate member (wearing a red jacket) on the ground. The other consulate staff were trying to free him from Bob's grasp, and at no point in time was Bob ever lying on the ground in the footage.
    1
  16296.  @davis7428  Also, since you brought up Brendan Kavanagh, well can you tell me the name of the Chinese official involved in the Brendan Kavanagh incident?
    1
  16297.  @MikeTrainormusic  China had discovered a new strain of covid in Wuhan, reported its findings to the WHO and took necessary countermeasures, how's that considered "attacking"? As for interfering in elections, it's your own media that's refusing to cover the attempt on Trump's life while simultaneously promoting Kamala Harris. And if you put your own property up for sale, then can't Chinese buyers purchase those property if its for sale?
    1
  16298.  @camt8804  "This is core to the dignity of all Chinese people and you should have the shame to apologise." You're the one claiming that the Chinese diplomat Zheng Xiyuan was dragged by embassy staff into the grounds and beaten, yet you're asking me to apologize? You've clearly shown that you don't care about checking facts first and just feign sympathy in order to "virtue-signal" that's all.
    1
  16299.  @camt8804  "Shenzhou. LOL you deleted your comment about expats " I clearly made no such comment. Had I made such a comment, then other people would have also called me out on it long ago. Yet it appears you're the only one doing so, and then claiming I deleted the comment when I asked where have I said such a thing.
    1
  16300.  @camt8804  This is truly absurd. You're accusing me of being a separatist, based on some made-up comment about Hong Kong "expats" living in China, of which you're now claiming that I have deleted? It's simply ridiculous, when have I ever advocated for Hong Kong separatism in all my posts? It's all just a red herring to distract from you claiming that "the embassy staff dragged Zheng Xiyuan into the grounds and beat him."
    1
  16301.  @camt8804  This is truly absurd. You're accusing me of being a separatist, based on some made-up comment about Hong Kong "expats" living in China, of which you're now claiming that I have deleted? It's simply ridiculous, when have I ever advocated for Hong Kong separatism in all my posts?
    1
  16302.  @camt8804  Throughout my posts, I have been constantly advocating for peaceful reunification of Taiwan island with mainland China, so why would you suddenly accuse me of supporting separatism in Hong Kong? When confronted, you just claimed that I deleted some comment I supposedly made about Hong Kong "expats". It clearly doesn't make sense why you think I would suddenly change my stance completely on separatism.
    1
  16303.  @camt8804  "Shenzhou. You've been fun wumao." This is just rich. First you claim I'm a separatist peddling western lies, now you're labelling me a wumao? Looks like you can't even make up your own mind on what to call me, let alone checking the facts accurately before claiming a Chinese diplomat was dragged by embassy staff into the grounds and beaten. You're just doing this to "virtue-signal" that's all.
    1
  16304.  @camt8804  Again, what post are you talking about? You're labelling me a Hong Kong separatist based off some made-up post that I've supposedly deleted? Who's going to believe that I'm a separatist after all my posts? You're just trying to distract from your earlier comment on the Chinese diplomat being dragged by embassy staff that's all.
    1
  16305.  @camt8804  You said that I "deleted" my post, then can you tell me what was written on this post before it was deleted? Had I been truly advocating for Hong Kong separatism in such a post then wouldn't I have been called out by others long ago?
    1
  16306.  @LawasSarawak  That davis guy can't even name the Chinese officials that "walk around demanding things from people."
    1
  16307.  @zackk4969  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"? Video: Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' youtu.be/DPt-zXn05ac
    1
  16308.  @zackk4969  “Diary of a Madman”.《狂人日记》 is a work of fiction by Lu Xun, then why are you confusing fiction with reality?
    1
  16309.  @zackk4393  But according to Wikipedia: A Madman's Diary, the diary form was inspired by Nikolai Gogol's short story "Diary of a Madman", as was the idea of the madman who sees reality more clearly than those around him. It's a work of fiction, not based on a true story.
    1
  16310.  @zackk4393  Synopsis: The story was inspired from a fiction entitled “Diary of a madman” written by Nikolai Gogol in 1834. As the title suggests, the story outlines a diary written by a madman. The allegory was conveyed by a first-person narrator. source:wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Madman%27s_Diary#Synopsis
    1
  16311. They fear revenge from those countries that they have wronged.
    1
  16312. Vote Trump for 2nd term, and maybe he might make another try for the wall at the US-Mexico border like he promised. Maybe he might succeed this time.
    1
  16313. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16314.  @dnivaranamaratis How's that genius? Advertisements and sponsors in videos actually put off viewers who don't want to watch those advertisements and discourage viewership. Already you can find comments on channel claiming that the advertisements are annoying and that they've unsubscribed because of that, then how is that a genius alibi?
    1
  16315.  @valenrn8657  DW is German state-owned media, don't trust what it says. Also, it appears that by 2014, Ukraine had resumed exports to Russia according to World Bank figures.
    1
  16316.  @valenrn8657  Deutsche Welle, abbreviated to DW, is a German public, state-owned international broadcaster *funded by the German federal tax budget.
    1
  16317. The Pound Sterling was the global reserve back when Great Britain was the world's largest economy in the 19th century. It was replaced by the U.S Dollar when the United States overtook Britain as the world's largest economy in the 20th century. It's only a matter of time before China's economy surpasses the U.S's economy in the 21st century, and with that, the Reminbi is expected to become a global reserve.
    1
  16318. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国很傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16319.  @jp95js  But Hitler's NAZI Party sycophants promoted war NOT peace. What the Barretts, Jayoe Nation, Jason, Gweilo 60 and Cyrus Janssen are promoting is peace and understanding of China. If anything, it's Western MSM like 60 Minutes Australia that's trying to manufacture consent for war with China, among its audiences.
    1
  16320.  @zackk4969  Zhao a film-director is already a God to you? Then you'll freak over hearing what the former U.S Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, has to say about lying, cheating and stealing.
    1
  16321.  @jp95js  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc,) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a Map of all the territory Taiwan claims (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  16322.  @dwaynebarnaby3598  Chinese 'Star Wars' laser gun appears to set fire to objects at a distance Video: /watch?v=07XpBUzlxxE This Lithium powered laser gun appears to set fire to objects several hundred metres away
    1
  16323.  @dwaynebarnaby3598  The People's Liberation Army Rocket Force won't just launch a single missile at an aircraft carrier strike group, we'll launch a whole barrage of missiles and saturate the area. And launch multiple waves of missiles for good measure.
    1
  16324.  @dwaynebarnaby3598  China is home to many of the world's largest banks, such as China Construction Bank, AgBank, Bank of China, ICBC, Bank of Communications, Postal Savings Bank of China, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank (China), Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, China CITIC Bank, China Minsheng Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Hua Xia Bank and many more. Source: Wikipedia: List of largest banks
    1
  16325.  @dwaynebarnaby3598  The US destroyers and frigates anti-missiles ammunition are limited out at sea and you can't guarantee 100% anti-missile defense. Whereas the PLA Rocket Force can continually launch salvo after salvo of anti-ship missiles from the safety of the land. Video: /watch?v=Nr6YoE5TtOI&t=139
    1
  16326.  sanjay chauhan  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  16327.  sanjay chauhan  Why do you not have respect for CPC? The government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and half production, closing down tourist attractions, imposing lockdown, banning mass gatherings, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and combat the coronavirus. Now it's finally paying off that the virus is under control in China and we are slowly reopening out economy. But in Western countries like US and UK, their economies are far too precious to sacrifice so human health has to be sacrificed instead. Trump wants to reopen USA by Easter and Boris Johnson wants to rely on "herd immunity" to pull through. So human lives have to be sacrificed instead of the economy.
    1
  16328.  @foxycon9059  Chinese scientist determined that the coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market. Analysis of genomic data from 93 samples of the novel coronavirus suggests it was imported from elsewhere. Source: Coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, Chinese scientists say scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3051981/coronavirus-did-not-originate-wuhan-seafood-market-chinese So what has China's wet markets even got to do with the coronavirus?
    1
  16329.  @foxycon9059  The Wuhan Wet Market doesn't even sell exotic animals, its a Seafood Market (like those in Japan and Korea) not a Bat meat market. So why should China close our wet markets?
    1
  16330.  @amitpatilamit  Actually, if you look at the Top 10 Highest Grossing Films in China, they are all Chinese-made (except for Avengers: Endgame which was a global hit).
    1
  16331.  @johanhirte9661  "神州 Shenzhou U forgot to mention that “communist” is just included with no meaning" Till date, no country in the world has achieved true "communism" (i.e A classless, stateless, moneyless society). Communism is a goal that "communists" strive towards. Even the former Soviet Union never claimed that their country had attained communism, the Soviets called their country the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), and that communism was a goal for the USSR to strive towards. Likewise, the Communist Party of China never claimed that China is communist, but it remains an eventual goal. So there is meaning behind the name "communist" in the CPC. You said: "and that the Chinese “communist” party is not socialist or communist at all." Communism is an eventual end goal of the party, and socialism is defined as a "transition" stage for China to achieve before embarking towards eventual communism. Socialism has multiple interpretations, and the one China has chosen is "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics", which was coined by Deng Xiaoping. Deng's theory stipulated that China was in the primary stage of socialism due to its relatively low level of material wealth and needed to engage in economic growth before it pursued a more egalitarian form of socialism, which in turn would lead to a communist society (as described in Marxist orthodoxy). In other words, China is not yet communist nor exactly socialist (i.e we are still in the primary stage, and need to engage in economic growth first).
    1
  16332.  @samfkt  "but if you look 100-200 years ago, EU and even USA is more and more "open-minded" than before" The U.S literally had the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 which suspended Chinese immigration to America and declared Chinese immigrants ineligible for U.S citizenship. But that still doesn't change the fact that anti-Asian hate crimes surged by 339% in USA last year. "you know the fact that Russia themselves did many harm to their own people throughput the whole history?" Russia is not the one banning Russian musicians, conductors, athletes, artists, now it's the EU, UK and USA that's doing that right now. "I can name you atleast 50-100 names (Russians vs Russians)." And there are 5,000+ sanctions on Russia, as well as banning Russian musicians, composers, artists, etc, by the West. "Russian leaders almost never cared about their own composers, musicians, artists, culture etc." That's a bold statement, do you have proof to supplement such a claim? "Putin is said to be "cheap" and not very rich on paper but in reallity he is indeed the richest man on the world (no doubt)." Where's your proof that Putin is the richest man in the world? "Those sanctions are prevention methods because they think they could support the ongoing war" Sanctions don't work, they only harm the ordinary Russians and make life difficult for them. "and all the money is frozen (not stolen, Russians also frozed some west stuff like the airplanes, huge amount of them, that was their answer to those sanctions etc.)" Russia can't even access their money to pay back loans (and is unfairly labelled as "having defaulted") so how's that not stolen? And Russia only froze stuff because it was done to them first (by your admission). "Many of those "fired" ones openly approved the invasion and wore the "Z" tshirts or whatever etc." Russian conductor Valery Gergiev was sacked because he refused to speak out against the Russia-Ukraine conflict, but that's not the same as openly approving of it. And there are many Russian atheletics, skaters, tennis players that are being banned from competitions, just because of they are Russian.
    1
  16333.  @samfkt  The U.S literally had the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 which suspended Chinese immigration to America and declared Chinese immigrants ineligible for U.S citizenship. "you know the fact that Russia themselves did many harm to their own people throughput the whole history?" Russia is not the one banning Russian musicians, conductors, athletes, artists, now it's the EU, UK and USA that's doing that right now. "Putin is said to be "cheap" and not very rich on paper but in reallity he is indeed the richest man on the world (no doubt)." Where's your proof that Putin is the richest man in the world? "and all the money is frozen (not stolen, Russians also frozed some west stuff like the airplanes, huge amount of them, that was their answer to those sanctions etc.)" Russia can't even access their money to pay back loans (and is unfairly labelled as "having defaulted") so how's that not stolen? And Russia only froze stuff because it was done to them first (by your admission). "Many of those "fired" ones openly approved the invasion and wore the "Z" tshirts or whatever etc." Russian conductor Valery Gergiev was sacked because he refused to speak out against the Russia-Ukraine conflict, but that's not the same as openly approving of it. And there are many Russian atheletics, skaters, tennis players that are being banned from competitions, just because of they are Russian.
    1
  16334. Taiwan will be destroyed when the US Congressman would rather bomb TMSC than seeing Taiwan reunified with the mainland.
    1
  16335.  724warlord  According to Jay Matthews, reporter for The Washington Post, as far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square and all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. Source: The Myth of Tiananmen https://archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php
    1
  16336. There are sources claiming that Vietnam built islands in South China Sea, long before China too.
    1
  16337.  @hkccp  "神州 Shenzhou do you have proof of it ?" The ultra-nationalist, neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion are literally part of the Ukraine National Guard and they are conducting genocide of ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Luhansk (collectively known as Donbas). Over the course of 8 years, an estimated 14,000 civilians have been killed in Donbas by shelling from both sides. Russia is not starting a war, it's putting an end to the war started since the 2014 coup d'etat of Ukraine's government by USA.
    1
  16338.  @hkccp  NATO bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade during their bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999, killing 3 Chinese journalists and outraging the Chinese public. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman did an excellent job telling the West off when they told China to support NATO's side.
    1
  16339.  @hkccp  But there hasn't been any shelling of Taiwan islands by the mainland since the Taiwan Strait crisis in 1958. But you can't say the same for Ukraine ultra-nationalist, neo-nazis that's been genociding ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Luhansk for 8 years. Have you watched Oliver Stone's 2016 Documentary Ukraine on Fire (available on YouTube)? It goes into detail how fascism got rooted in Ukraine during Nazi Germany period, and how fascism has gone unpunished and allowed to surface from time to time in Ukraine.
    1
  16340. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16341.  @KH-cs7sj  You said: "Your view on human right is quite narrow." Did I ever mention my view on human rights here in this thread? Then how can you claim that my view is quite narrow? If by hogs you are referring to the "kapitalist pigs" then we are in agreement that they have grown beyond the need for subsistence, which you have defined as "supporting oneself at a minimum level". But China's view is that if this simple human need is absent, then all other human rights pale in comparison. What's the point of being able to vote, if you don't have access to infant formula for your babies?
    1
  16342.  @KH-cs7sj  "神州 Shenzhou I inferred your view on human rights based on how you are content with satisfying basic needs." Did I ever said that I'm content with satisfying basic needs? I never even said anything about my own view in this thread, yet you just jump to conclusions without knowing anything of my views? You said: "If anything, it shows how US is willing to deploy its military to help its people with basic day-to-day needs." The U.S military have also been deployed in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, which don't really offer much to American people in terms of basic day-to-day needs. You said: "On the contrary, I remember poisonous milk powder was a big problem in China up until recently and Chinese parents still don't trust homemade formula brand until now." The Sanlu Milk Scandal was in 2008, that's litearlly 14 years ago, how is that considered recent? The shortage of milk powder in the U.S is a recent thing, but why are you bring up events from over a decade ago and calling it recent?
    1
  16343.  @KH-cs7sj  You said: " 400k depositors of Henan banks lost all their deposit totalling 30 billion yuan" Those money have not been lost, they are frozen due to links to financial corruption. On July 12, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission announced it would start reimbursing account holders, with deposits of up to 50,000 yuan ($7,400) being the first to be returned. You said: "four Chinese women were beaten to death in Tangshan and the government still haven't disclosed whether they are alive." What are the names of those four Chinese women who were allegedly beaten to death? You said: "But at least the society as a whole reckons and corrects the mistake." What corrections have been made to U.S police services after the death of George Floyd? Other African Americans like Breonna Taylor and Rayshard Brooks have been killed by the police still.
    1
  16344.  @srisivaraman8063  If that's so, then why is it many Chinese people tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead, whereas many Westerners tend to be pessimistic and have a gloomy outlook of the future?
    1
  16345. @comment sense I've already discussed this point with you. The Earth's resources are indeed limited but under capitalism, there is no regard for sustainability, nor welfare of the workers, nor the environmental impact. It's the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, with the end goal being the eventual depletion of the Earth's resources. It's a pity, because our modern industrial capabilities allow us to produce enough food, medicine, houses, schools, for everyone on the planet. Yet we still have starving people, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to adequate healthcare. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs". Imagine if we had a system that distributes material needs according to the urgency.
    1
  16346. @comment sense You said: "what do people need you ask? people need a car, a truck, food, a house, etc." Yes, but even though our manufacturing capability is able to make enough food, cars, housing, schools, hospitals, etc, why is it we still have starving people, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to affordable healthcare, and people who have to worry about rising gas prices? Isn't there are better way to redistribute the Earth's limited resources rather than let capitalism do the dividing?
    1
  16347. @comment sense You said: "those who are talented and work hard better keep up because there are people looking for free stuff." Low-income groups work harder than anyone else, sometimes taking on multiple jobs just to stay afloat, and their contributes to society are immense whether its just keeping our streets cleans, growing our food and delivering food, fixing and maintaining pipelines and electricity cables, building houses, etc. The capitalist way of thinking has taught you to despise people who are poor, to tell you that they deserve what they deserve.
    1
  16348. @comment sense You said: "those who are talented and work hard better keep up because there are people looking for free stuff." Low-income groups work harder than anyone else, sometimes taking on multiple jobs just to stay afloat, and their contributes to society are immense whether its just keeping our streets cleans, growing our food and delivering food, fixing and maintaining pipelines and electricity cables, building houses, etc.
    1
  16349. @comment sense You said: "can't they innovate? what is keeping them away from innovation?" There's many factors at play. Firstly, low income groups often have to work multiple jobs, who has the time to innovate when they are so busy putting food on the table? Secondly, the capitalist society is designed such that capital is needed to kickstart innovation, and that is something that many low-income groups simply lack. Lastly, education plays a factor, and many low income groups are unable to afford the expensive school fees necessary for a higher education to broaden their minds. In short, money is the problem here. Education is the cornerstone of economic and social development, which is why Marxists argue in favour of free, decent education for everyone – so that individuals and society as a whole can maximise the potential for improving our lives through innovation, efficiency and imagination.
    1
  16350. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou so what you are saying is that those people with low income due to little abilities should get all the free stuff according to their needs from the hard work of those with abilities." There are indeed low income people who have little abilities (like for example, the elderly and the handicapped) and its apparent that their needs are oftentimes greater than those of young healthy workers. The thing is why should humanity be so heartless towards these people? Everyone grows old eventually, and people with handicap didn't ask for this advantage. Communism is proposing is to "meet their basic needs," of these disadvantaged people that's all. Surely human progress has advanced to the point where we can prioritise the welfare of less fortunate people, rather than constantly pursue profits?
    1
  16351. @comment sense You said: "perhaps you can spread your communism to the whole world so oil producing countries can give you free oil according to your needs." According to your logic, if communism "was spread to the whole world", that means the entire world's needs are factored and the entire world's resources are distributed according to who needs it most urgently (according to the principles of communism). In today's scenario, Sri Lanka is currently facing a severe oil crisis (of catastrophic proportions) so imagine the lives that could be saved if resources were allocated to those who truly need it most and cannot afford it.
    1
  16352. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou giving resources to elderly and handicapped people are charity work." And is there something fundamentally wrong and inhuman about charity work? Why should the poor grow poorer while the rich have more money and resources than they can afford to spend? There's something clearly wrong with this system called capitalism, that seeks to deplete the Earth of resources all in mindless pursuit of profits. When we all eventually die, can we take our profits into the afterlife? Why not seek a better more efficient distribution of resources compared to the current system under capitalism? This is why Karl Marx did not believe capitalism to be the end goal of humanity's development. It's too inhumane, too unfeeling, and mindlessly pursuits profit while neglecting other more meaningful factors.
    1
  16353. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou giving resources to elderly and handicapped people are charity work." And is there something fundamentally wrong and inhuman about charity work? Why should the poor grow poorer while the rich have more money and resources than they can afford to spend? There's something clearly wrong with this system called capitalism, that seeks to deplete the Earth of resources all in mindless pursuit of profits. When we all eventually die, can we take our profits into the afterlife? Why not seek a better more efficient distribution of resources compared to the current system under capitalism?
    1
  16354. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou giving resources to elderly and handicapped people are charity work." And is there something fundamentally wrong and inhuman about charity work? Why should the poor grow poorer while the rich have more money and resources than they can afford to spend? This is why Karl Marx did not believe capitalism to be the end goal of humanity's development. It's too inhumane, too unfeeling, and mindlessly pursuits profit while neglecting other more meaningful factors.
    1
  16355. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou you may think you are poor, but there are people even poorer than you are." The greatest change doesn't come from poor people giving people even poorer their hard earned money. The greatest change comes from rich people giving poor people enough to meet their basic needs (at virtually no cost to themselves). Studies have shown that if the top 1% of richest people in the world gave away half their assets to the bottom 50% of low income groups, the 1% will still be the world's richest, while the improvement of living standards to the bottom 50% would be life-changing.
    1
  16356. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou You are talking about how great communism is for the whole world. China now occupies south china sea." Because we currently do not live in world of communism, we live in one of capitalism, so it's unrealistic to expect China to adhere to the principles of communism when the rest of the world don't. Communism only works when everyone is in agreement with its principles, much like democratic elections only works if voters are well-informed and make rational decisions when casting their votes, instead of irrational voting based off emotions.
    1
  16357. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou did i say charity work for the elderly and the handicapped people are wrong?" Looking at your earlier comments, this appears to be your stance, when you said (and I quote your own words): "THE STRONG GROW AND THE WEAK SHRINK." but if it's not your stance, then does that mean you agree with the basic principles of communism? Then we are in agreement. You said: "what i said was do you treat everyone as a charity case?" Of course not. There is the first part of the Marxist saying which is "From each according to his ability," Marx intended the initial part of his slogan, to suggest not merely that each person should work as hard as they can, but that each person should best develop their particular talents. Have you ever felt that your contribution to society could be greater if you were doing work that you actually enjoyed? If one derives pleasure from contributing to a certain aspect of human society, then it no longer becomes work. Work is when people have to perform this task in order to pay their bills and put food on the table, because we live under the dictates of capitalism.
    1
  16358. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou do what you want. every country reaps what it sows." Looks like you've retreated to repeating your defeatist mantra (like you did in that other thread where we discussed the same topic). Have you wondered why is it people are just so afraid to discuss Marxism and communism in the West? Many people who intensely hate Karl Marx's teaching have admitted that they don't even have a clue about his teachings, nor have they read his books.
    1
  16359. @comment sense You said: "if you are weak, then japan and usa kick your butte." That's what happened to China for the past century, we were humiliated by Western powers and Japan, who carved up Chinese territory like a pie and served it among themselves (like in that infamous French cartoon). A big country with a weak army will only invite invaders to our lands, so China's response is to build up our military capabilities to act as a deterrent against potential invaders.
    1
  16360. @comment sense Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA in all three subjects: reading, science and mathematics. PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment
    1
  16361. @comment sense It's apparent that you only have the most rudimentary understanding of Marxist theory, you just think it's bad without actually justifying it, when it's capitalism that's responsible for the world's problems today. If you think Marxism is so deplorable, then why do you rely on China to manufacture all your Made-in-China goods?
    1
  16362. @comment sense It's apparent that you only have the most rudimentary understanding of Marxist theory, you just think it's bad without actually justifying it, when it's kapitalism that's responsible for the world's problems today. If you think Marxism is so deplorable, then why do you rely on China to manufacture all your Made-in-China goods? If capitalism is so great, why does the U.S still depend on China to manufacture their goods?
    1
  16363. @comment sense Chinese universities produce the most STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) out of any other country in the world. Countries With The Most STEM Graduates 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates This implies that China is going to play a much larger role in the STEM fields, given the sheer number of graduates produced in these fields.
    1
  16364. @comment sense It's not Marxist countries that are begging capitalist countries for help, it's capitalist countries like the USA that relies on China for their Made-in-China products, so your question should be in reverse.
    1
  16365. @comment sense I don't know why you keep on insisting that Marxist countries are begging capitalist countries. Isn't NATO begging China to cut off trade with Russia? Isn't Europe begging Russia not to cut off the Russian gas tap? It's like you got the world's situation in reverse here.
    1
  16366. @comment sense So why then do countries continue to rely on China to manufacture their products?
    1
  16367. @comment sense You asked "WHICH COUNTRY PRODUCES THE MOST HIGH TECH PRODUCTS IN THE WORLD?" Top 10 by High-Tech Product Exports (2019) 1. China ($731,890,595) 2. Hong Kong SAR, China ($330,093,815) 3. Germany ($210,082,307) 4. South Korea ($192,789,656) 5. United States ($156,365,524) 6. France ($117,814,412) 7. Singapore ($115,446,548) 8. Japan ($111,020,443) 9. Malaysia ($90,395,903) 10. Netherlands ($85,690,573) ... Source: YouTube: Top 20 Country by High-Technology Exports (1989-2019) (High-technology exports are products with high R&D intensity, such as in aerospace, computers-office machines, electronics-telecommunications, pharmacy, scientific instruments, electrical machinery, chemistry, non-electrical machinery, armament.)
    1
  16368. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou major retailers in canada are all american companies." But they still make use of Made-in-China products, so why do capitalist countries continue to rely on China? Isn't this the opposite of you claiming marxist depending on capitalist countries?
    1
  16369. @comment sense You asked: "WHICH COUNTRY PRODUCES THE MOST HIGH TECH PRODUCTS IN THE WORLD?" I typed your question into Google, and it replied "China is the top country by high-technology exports in the world. As of 2020, high-technology exports in China was 757,682 million US dollars that accounts for 26.57% of the world's high-technology exports." So there's the answer to your question.
    1
  16370. @comment sense I searched "Does Canada rely on China to manufacture their products" and Google replied: "The welfare of Canadians is enhanced by importing consumer goods from China. The imports of intermediate and capital goods, particularly electrical equipment, are important inputs to Canadian production." So it appears that Canada does rely on China for products like electrical equipment after all.
    1
  16371. @comment sense You said: "神州 Shenzhou i do not think you are really bright." You can't even formulate a proper argument against me regarding Marxist teachings, yet you continue to insult me as not being bright?
    1
  16372. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou my comments have been censored." So censorship does exist even on Western platforms like YouTube after all.
    1
  16373. @comment sense You said: "let me put it this way though. usa really needs china because no other countries can provide cheap labor. mexico labour are just as expensive as usa, india's labour are just as expensive as usa. south american labour are just as expensive as usa. only china has cheap labour." You've literally just contradicted your earlier statement when you said: "神州 Shenzhou CHEAP LABOUR ARE FOUND WORLD WIDE. TONS OF CHEAP LABOR WORLD WIDE." Which is it?
    1
  16374. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou you keep on saying that china has high technology," That's because you asked me the question: "WHICH COUNTRY PRODUCES THE MOST HIGH TECH PRODUCTS IN THE WORLD?" and I simply answered. You said: "but if china has a high technology then how come china has to send their students to usa to study science" Because China already produces the most STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) out of any other country in the world at 4.7 million per year. So some Chinese students are unable to qualify for entrance into local Chinese universities, so they choose to study abroad, in Western schools and universities. But it doesn't change the fact that China produces more STEM graduates than any other in the world.
    1
  16375. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou how long ago was that article written?" Dated to September 2020, the article's title is The Canada-China Global Commerce Picture and Supply Chain Links by Government of Canada.
    1
  16376. @comment sense Why are you contradicting yourself, when you boasted earlier: "神州 Shenzhou CHEAP LABOUR ARE FOUND WORLD WIDE. TONS OF CHEAP LABOR WORLD WIDE." now you're claiming _"usa really needs china because no other countries can provide cheap labor."? Which one is it?
    1
  16377. @comment sense Speaking of train tracks, China is home to the world's largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are very fast, the journeys smooth and enjoyable. Passengers even tried balancing a coin on its edge while in a train traveling at 350 kph and the coin remained balanced. Countries by High-Speed Railway Construction (2019) 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. France (3,870 km) 4. Germany (3,596 km) 5. Japan (3,422 km) 6. Russia (2,026 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,997 km) 8. Italy (1,697 km) 9. South Korea (1,481 km) 10. Finland (744 km) ... Source: YouTube: High-Speed Railway (HSR) Construction by Country (1965-2019)
    1
  16378. 说的对，翻墙之后就觉得西方媒体对中国很傲慢与偏见，很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，和他们讲道理也讲不到。
    1
  16379. KenBrownfield Trump would have to convince the Americans to support his dictatorship, like how Putin convinced Russians to support him.
    1
  16380.  stephen kroll  Where does it say that the Africans in the video never left Guangzhou?
    1
  16381.  Dark of the knight  Look at all those racially-motivated attacks against Asian Americans (and Asian Canadians, Asian Australians, Asian Europeans, etc) because American politicians like Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo choose to refer to the virus by it's improper name, Chinese virus, instead of its proper name, Covid-19. Video: Asian Americans face discrimination in wake of the coronavirus youtu.be/t_IyTxRNUYk
    1
  16382.  @asdfmeny  It's not racism, Chinese people fear the virus, not other races. Before the epidemic, Chinese treat foreigners very well and during Wuhan lockdown, there was some discrimination against people from Hubei province (but it's not racism against fellow Chinese). But now that Covid-19 is ravaging Europe, and USA is the epicentre, and some Nigerians tested positive for Covid-19, suddenly means that all previous goodwill Chinese had towards foreigners is forgotten and suddenly Chinese are racist?
    1
  16383.  Dark of the knight  So how have I been racist then? I merely stated that both Chinese and foreigners are equal under the law in China and many other overseas Chinese returning to China also undergo mandatory 14 day quarantine. Even till today there is some discrimination against people from Wuhan (which is not racist) but when it involves foreigners (African, Caucasian etc) suddenly its a matter of racism?
    1
  16384.  Dark of the knight  Video: Asian woman attacked with acid outside her home in New York youtu.be/_XizsaCNaHc A 39-year-old Asian woman from New York City suffered severe burns across her body after someone sneaked up behind her as she was throwing out the trash and splashed her with acid.
    1
  16385.  Dark of the knight  "There are people who push nationalism narrative when it can ultimately be ultimately racist in a sense yet call himself not racist." Which part of my comment has been nationalistic, you tell me? The part where I said that people from Wuhan get discriminated too by other Chinese? Or the part I where I said Chinese fear the virus, not other races?
    1
  16386.  Dark of the knight  What logic is this? How is my commenting on China-related videos equal to me promoting nationalism? Which comment of mine here in this thread promotes nationalism, you tell me? When I said that some Chinese discriminate against people from Hubei province and that returning overseas Chinese have to be quarantined for 14 days?
    1
  16387.  Dark of the knight  Africans travel to non-African countries and whenever they encounter problems, some start playing the Race Card when things don't go their way. Who invented the Race Card if not Africans?
    1
  16388.  Dark of the knight  You know who invented the Race Card and blames other races whenever things don't go there way? Africans! I never said anything about Africans purging Chinese (I don't even know why you brought it up) I said Africans travel to non-African countries and whenever they face difficulties, some of them play the Race Card, because its the easiest option to absolve themselves of all blame. You don't even bother to read my posts properly, who said anything about Africans purging Chinese out of Africa?
    1
  16389.  @jaydee6268  America is actually dependent on China for almost 80% of its medicines, which is especially important given the current situation. Fox Business reports that according to FDA estimate at least 80 percent of active ingredients found in all of America’s medicine come from abroad, primarily from China. And it’s not just the ingredients, China wants to become the world’s dominant generic drug maker. So far Chinese companies are making generic for everything from high blood pressure to chemotherapy drugs. 90 percent of America’s prescriptions are for generic drugs. Source: U.S. is Dependent on China for Almost 80% of Its Medicine saraacarter.com/u-s-is-dependent-on-china-for-almost-80-of-its-medicine/ Even medical masks are mostly Made in China and the USA urgently needs our masks during this difficult period. Source: The U.S. Needs China’s Masks, as Acrimony Grows nytimes.com/2020/03/23/business/coronavirus-china-masks.html American front-line medical personnel are running desperately short of masks and protective equipment as they battle the coronavirus outbreak. China, already the world’s largest producer of such gear by far, has ramped up factory output and is now signaling that it wants to help.
    1
  16390.  @jaydee6268  Medical-Industrial Complex? That sounds far better than a Military-Industrial Complex that promotes warfare.
    1
  16391.  @jaydee6268  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    1
  16392.  @jaydee6268  If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. In fact, Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Source: Map of ROC Administrative and Claims wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. And since Taiwan can claim all of mainland China, then why can't mainland China claim Taiwan as well?
    1
  16393.  @jaydee6268  What makes you think PRC will a be sore loser and start a nuclear war? China signed a No First Use (NFU) policy with regards to nuclear weapons, meaning that China will not use nukes unless we are ourselves attacked with nukes first. China declared our NFU policy in 1964, and has since maintained this policy. Source: No first use wikipedia.org/wiki/No_first_use Whereas the USA did not sign such a policy and they can launch a preemptive nuclear strike against anywhere in the world, presumably without legal consequences. So if there is to be a nuclear war, China won't be the one starting it.
    1
  16394.  @jaydee6268  "神州 Shenzhou Actually I thought I said the opposite:" You said earlier (and I quote your words) that: "I highly doubt the conflict will escalate to nuclear war unless the PRC is a sore loser." but I have already shown that PRC subscribe to No First Use policy in which China will not use nuclear weapons unless we are ourselves attacked with nukes first. So how would PRC be a sore loser?
    1
  16395.  @jaydee6268  Why did the ROC 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to PROC 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, as well as solidifying the Communists right to rule the mainland.
    1
  16396.  @jaydee6268  About nuclear weapons, China is home to the world's longest range ICBM (Intercontinental Ballistic Missile), the DongFeng-41 (东风-41), with operational range between 12,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the US LGM-30 Minuteman range of 13,000 km. Video: China missile test DF-41 launch from railroad train youtu.be/h2kjMctT8yU?t=13
    1
  16397.  @jaydee6268  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: White Terror (Taiwan) wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Terror_(Taiwan) But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Source: Taiwan Miracle wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_Miracle Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Today, Taiwan's economy is stagnating, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising, and Taiwan graduates are seeking employment opportunities abroad, such as in mainland China or Singapore.
    1
  16398.  @jaydee6268  Article 4 of the Constitution of the Republic of China (Taiwan) 🇹🇼 reads the following: The territory of the Republic of China according to its existing national boundaries shall not be altered except by resolution of the National Assembly. Source: Constitution of the Republic of China (Taiwan) law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=A0000001 Since there is no amendments to ROC's constitution by resolution of the National Assembly, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  16399.  @jaydee6268  China's DongFeng-41 (东风-41) ICBM even has MIRV (Multiple Independent Reentry Vehicle capability, meaning that each missile contains 6 to 10 warheads that can independently target different sites. Video: China's DF-41 ICBM The World’s Longest range Nuclear Missile youtu.be/6NzwzpMyuAc?t=60 So just 5 of these DF-41 babies can theoretically target up to 30-50 different sites.
    1
  16400.  @jaydee6268  China has inducted the world's first operational anti-ship ballistic missile, a "carrier killer" capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, known as the DF-21D. Video: China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile youtu.be/p-cEunmqXM8 The DF-21D is capable of targeting aircraft carrier strike groups out in the open ocean, from the safety of the land. The DF-21D is launched from land-based mobile launchers and flies high up into the stratosphere, using its advanced maneuverability to avoid interception by anti-missile defenses below, before falling at hypersonic speeds (above Mach 20) The warhead is even capable of terminal guidance, making last minute adjustments to its trajectory just seconds before impact.
    1
  16401.  @jaydee6268  Taiwan has no nuclear weapons, what are you talking about? In 1972 the US President ordered nuclear weapons to be removed from Taiwan and this was implemented by 1974. As for China's military, the People's Liberation Army is world's largest land army and China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank has commanded healthy respect from international observers, as its performance parameters are equal to many top Western designs (like the Russian T-90 and the US M1 Abrams), and the Type 99 also packs a few unique tricks of its own. Source: China's Deadly Type 99 Tank vs. Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/chinas-deadly-type-99-tank-vs-russias-t-90-americas-m-1-17836 China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank was even featured in our 70th anniversary National Day parade. Video: China's new generation main battlefield tanks revealed in National Day Parade youtu.be/Ec4Bu2orKTk
    1
  16402.  @jaydee6268  Besides the DF-21D "Carrier Killer" Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile, China also has DF-26 ASBM, which is a bigger variant with extended range, able to hit the US territory of Guam. Hence, DF-26 is nicknamed "Guam Killer." China's new Dongfeng-26 ballistic missile can hit the US territory of Guam. Video: China's DF-26 ballistic missile drill sends 'clear message' to the U.S. youtu.be/Y5f-qvnabHY The mid-range missile can travel up to 5,740km (3,570 miles). It's in-flight maneuverability makes it easier to hit moving targets like aircraft carriers. This DF-26 drills are seen as a message to the US about China's growing military power.
    1
  16403.  @jaydee6268  So you want to see China's modern military technology? China has hypersonic missiles like the DF-ZF, which have been tested 7 times already and travels at speeds between 4,000 and 7,000 miles per hour. Source: China Successfully Tests Hypersonic Missile freebeacon.com/national-security/china-successfully-tests-hypersonic-missile/ U.S. intelligence officials have assessed that China plans to use the glider to deliver nuclear weapons through increasingly sophisticated missile defenses. The DF-ZF also could be used as part of a conventional strategic strike weapon capable of hitting targets around the world within an hour.
    1
  16404.  @jaydee6268  The DF-17 is the first hypersonic glide vehicle-equipped missile intended for operational deployment ever tested. Source: Introducing the DF-17: China’s Newly Tested Ballistic Missile Armed With a Hypersonic Glide Vehicle thediplomat.com/2017/12/introducing-the-df-17-chinas-newly-tested-ballistic-missile-armed-with-a-hypersonic-glide-vehicle/
    1
  16405.  @jaydee6268  China has successfully tested a cutting-edge hypersonic aircraft, Xingkong-2 (星空-2) or Starry Sky-2. Video: Military News: China tests hypersonic aircraft Starry Sky-2 youtu.be/aVWQ2uOCepU Starry Sky-2 was launched using a rocket and the aircraft rides shockwaves generated by its hypersonic flight and the test craft maintained speeds above Mach 5.5 for more than 400 seconds, reaching a top speed of 7,344 kmph. Experts say that the aircraft's speed and unpredictable trajectory will challenge modern missile defense systems.
    1
  16406. Scot Morrison was vehemently anti-China in his policies for Australia. Hopefully the new Australian PM would do a good job mending Australia-China relations.
    1
  16407. 太牛逼了。
    1
  16408. In fact, China is the largest printer of Christian Holy Bibles in the world.
    1
  16409. Brian said Russia was expelled from the UN Human Rights Council, but his article linked says that Russia was merely suspended which merely suggests a temporary ban, but not a permanent expulsion from the UN Human Rights council. So which one is correct? Was Russia expelled or suspended from the UNHRC?
    1
  16410. I thought an Englishman would tell you that you're Chinese, not English.
    1
  16411. You appear to be born and raised in environment of liberal Western Ideology, so of course you would think its the best, just like a Chinese born and raised in traditional environment would feel. But I would say that East Asian traditions ("Confucianism") have guided China for thousands of years, making China one of world's oldest 'continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations following democracy, like Greece and Rome have since faded to history. This just my opinion that's all.
    1
  16412. USA is concerned with so-called human rights violation in China, but apparently they are unconcerned with actual human rights violation going on in Saudi Arabia.
    1
  16413.  @chrishamlin5863  You yourself appear to hold such a low opinion of Chinese people yourself.
    1
  16414. Trump's bluff got called by China. He has literally no cards to play, because China makes the cards.
    1
  16415. I think it's Philippines that is playing the victim here. When the Philippines gained independence from America, they drew their national boundaries and did not include the Spratly islands as within Philippines national territory. But in the 1970s, Philippines President Marcos suddenly began incorporating those islands as part of Philippines.
    1
  16416. It's apparent that U.S is in decline, and China is rising. Since the 19th century, many Westerners have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much that the notion of China someday overtaking the United States is too frightening for many to fathom.
    1
  16417. SiaWeiSong You sound like you never been to China recently. Here is a short 2min video about 11 Chinese cities and how far China progressed. Video:Beautiful Night View of China 2016 youtube.com/watch?v=G7ZRa-w9xyA
    1
  16418. 现代的英国、法国、德国、西班牙、… 还算是罗马文明吗？已经分成别的国家了，为什么还算是罗马的延续？
    1
  16419. SkateTrooper Latin is still a dead language regardless, because it is no longer "evolving" and no new words in Latin being created and there aren't any native speakers with Latin as 1st language. Western people today do not dress like they did during Roman and Greek civilizations, but Chinese people still wear traditional clothing like qipao and cheongsam during Chinese New Year. China was also conquered by Mongolians and Manchu people, but those foreign rulers been slowly assimilated into Chinese culture. For example, Kublai Khan, a descendant of Genghis Khan, choose to forsake his Mongolians culture and adopt Chinese culture by proclaiming himself emperor of Yuan dynasty China. China had other weapons besides chariots. Chinese engineers invented the traction trebuchet and also the crossbow which spread to the West during medieval times and enabled even the unskilled peasant to fight against skilled archers in medieval Europe.
    1
  16420.  Giovanni Sanchez  What changed your mind?
    1
  16421.  @johnnyrommel4113  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w So which country do you think is the greater threat to global peace and stability?
    1
  16422.  Giovanni Sanchez  You love Chinese history, but don't like the Communist Party of China? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  16423.  Giovanni Sanchez  The Roman Empire has since fallen and fractured into UK, France, Germany, Turkey, Algeria, Egypt, etc, whereas Chinese civilization is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, what are you talking about? Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? And about Westerners being raised to think communism is bad, look at the transformation of Russia for example. Before the communist revolution in 1917, Russia was once arguably the poorest country in Europe, compared to the richer, developed Western Europe countries. Russia was once full of dirt-poor peasants, suffering from starvation under a corrupt Tsar, and Russia was technologically backward compared to the more developed Western Europe countries for sure. But after the 1917 Communist Revolution by the Bolsheviks, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe both militarily and economically. The Soviet Union was world's 2nd largest economy from 1960-1985 during its heyday, and even the Western European countries formed NATO because of how strong the Soviet Union had become under the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. Source: Soviet Union was world's 2nd largest economy from 1960-1985 wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_largest_historical_GDP#Overview_of_the_ten_largest_economies So why are you convinced that communism is evil, given such an amazing transformation in Russia, from arguably once the poorest country in Europe, to the strongest country in Europe, until NATO had to be formed against the Soviet Union? Such an amazing ideology, yet you Westerners demonise communism despite it's massive success?
    1
  16424.  Giovanni Sanchez  The most powerful empires were the Mongol Empire, the Persian Empire, the Caliphate, etc, of which majority were governed under authoritarian rule, not Western brand of democracy, so what's your point? You love Chinese 5000 years of history, that was all under the authoritarian rule of Emperors and the Imperial Court, because Chinese civilization has always been most successful under authoritarian rule (as we still are today), then why can't China continue under our current political system, when it has proven to be successful for our country? And have you no logical refute to the fact that Marxism-Lenism transformed Russia from arguably the poorest country in Europe at that time before 1917, to arguably the strongest country in Europe, both economically and militarily (that's why NATO was formed) after the Communist revolution? Other than claiming "Marxism and Communism" is evil? Why can't you formulate a proper argument in response to what Marxism-Lenism has achieved in Russia? It's a well-known fact today that Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." The Earth's resources are finite, and where capitalism seeks to exhaust them in the pursuit of profits, communism is dedicated to distributing resources according to needs.
    1
  16425.  Mitchell Edgecomb  China is building hydroelectric powerstations in Tibet to supply clean, renewable energy to Tibetan homes for warmth during chilling winters, electricity for lighting, appliances and electronics. Here's a List of hydroelectric powerstations in Tibet Autonomous Region: Ngari Hydro Power Station[1] 阿里水电站 Pangduo Hydro Power Station[2] 旁多水电站 Zhikong Hydro Power Station 直孔水电站 Bayu Hydro Power Station 巴玉水电站 Dagu Hydro Power Station 大古水电站 Jiexu Hydro Power Station 街需水电站 Zangmu Hydro Power Station 藏木水电站 Jiacha Hydro Power Station 加查水电站 Lengda Hydro Power Station 冷达水电站 Zhongda Hydro Power Station 仲达水电站 Langzhen Hydro Power Station 朗镇水电站 Changbo Hydro Power Station 昌波水电站 Suwalong Hydro Power Station 苏洼龙水电站 Batang Hydro Power Station 巴塘水电站 Lawa Hydro Power Station 拉哇水电站 Yebatan Hydro Power Station 叶巴滩水电站 Boluo Hydro Power Station 波罗水电站 Yanbi Hydro Power Station 岩比水电站 Gangtuo Hydro Power Station 岗托水电站 ... Source: List of hydroelectric powerstations in Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region
    1
  16426.  Charles Schmid  China has the Covid-19 situation under control, it's the Western democracies that has Covid-19 spiraling out of control in their countries.
    1
  16427.  Charles Schmid  Who neglected to take precautions of their own? Western democracies!
    1
  16428.  @mingkao1  I gave you the Map of territory claimed by Republic of China 🇹🇼 (wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) and it shows that Taiwan is clearly part of China. Both PRC 🇨🇳 and ROC subscribe to the One China Policy that there is only 1 country, not 2 sovereign countries representing China, and it is also agreed upon that Taiwan is part of this country China. It's just not agreed upon who is the real ruler of China that's all.
    1
  16429.  @patrickdempsey4034  Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-graft campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign, but after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption. Also, China's current political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  16430.  @mmakshak  Apple knew a supplier was using child labor but took 3 years to fully cut ties, despite the company's promises to hold itself to the 'highest standards,' report says. businessinsider.com/apple-knowingly-used-child-labor-supplier-3-years-cut-costs-2020-12
    1
  16431.  Marshall Applewhite  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  16432. 说实话翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16433.  @FullPerspective  "These islands where not recognized as being Chinese by Malaysia, the Philippines, Netherlands, the US and countless of other countries." The Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence in 1946 that the Spratlys was not Philippine territories as per the 1898 Treaty of Paris that Spain signed with USA. The Treaty Limits of the Philippines defines the maritime and territorial boundaries of the Philippines, which does not include the Spratly Islands. ... (Source: ResearchGate: The Treaty Limits of the Philippines) "The fact that China claimed the islands in 1947 does not alone give them right to them." It gives China a claim to the islands. Also in 1917, China was still being governed by the Nationalist Kuomintang which later fled to Taiwan island. And Taiwan Island today still maintains the claim to the 11 Dash Line, whereas the People's Republic of China has reduced it to the 9 Dash Line. "There is countless of land claims and disputes all over the world over territories, but what makes a country of peace which prevent war, is that the country will NOT lay hold of claims to territories where there is a dispute unless there is a INTERNATIONAL agreement allowing them to do so" As far as I know none of the claimants in the South China Sea are at war with each other, not China, not Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, etc. Which of those countries is China at war with? "The Spratly and Parcel Islands are not internationally recognized as belonging to China, nor is a lot of border dispute territories with India." The border dispute between China and India was created because after India was colonized by Britain, a British cartographer named Henry McMahon, arbitrarily drew up India's borders with China without consideration for existing historical boundaries, and yet till this day, India vehemently adheres to the McMahon Line (drawn by British) instead of looking at how the border existed historically.
    1
  16434.  @FullPerspective  "The Spratly and Parcel Islands was found, known and discovered long before 1947....The Islands was found by the UK in 1843 largely uninhabited." -In the Song Dynasty work Zhu Fan Zhi 诸蕃志 by Zhao Rukuo 趙汝适;, the name "Thousand Li Stretch of Sands" (Qianli Changsha, 千里長沙) and the "Ten-Thousand Li of Stone Pools/Beds" (Wanli Shitang 萬里石塘, or Wanli Shichuang 萬里石床) to referred to Paracel and Spratly respectively. History of Yuan (元史) also records Wanli Shitang referring to the Paracel Islands. The Mao Kun (茅坤) map dating from Zheng He's (鄭和) voyage also depicts islands at the bottom right depicting the Spratly Island. "There was no indication of these Islands belonging to China, they are far closer to the Philippines and Malaysia." See above. Also the Paracel Islands is within 200 NM of China's geographic baselines, so it's well within China's exclusive economic zone (EEZ).
    1
  16435.  Current Channel  Xiaomi was started in 2010. Today, it's one of the world's most popular smartphones. In India, it's number one. Video: How Xiaomi broke out of China to go global | CNBC Reports youtu.be/291DlKa7iIU
    1
  16436.  Current Channel  Huawei is 100% employee owned, by 96,000 current and former staff, leaving exactly 0% in the hands of the Chinese government. youtu.be/HAffWwL1E-Q Huawei does get government subsidies for doing R&D, but it's negligible compared to Huawei's revenue from sales. Huawei does get government tax cuts, but it's comparable to American companies. Chinese government agencies do offer loans to some Huawei customers abroad, but customers must repay those money, so it's not a gift.
    1
  16437.  Current Channel  Where is evidence that Meng Wanzhou lied about Huawei? Huawei was very successful, so the US government arrest Huawei CFO in order to strike a blow against Chinese companie and wound China's national pride.
    1
  16438.  Current Channel  Huawei overtakes Apple to become world's No. 2 smartphone seller youtu.be/6yKcTj05EiI
    1
  16439. China also has anti-satellite missile technology and demonstrated the ability to take out a satellite in orbit using ground launched missiles. This will undoubtedly impact modern military tactics greatly by cutting off flow of information.
    1
  16440. Aircraft carriers alone, doesn't determine whether a country will win or not. What about all the other factors and numbers the video discussed?
    1
  16441.  @hink0027  Well said. They want to sanction Chinese goods and prevent Chinese from earning money, yet they want China to buy their Western goods and to earn Chinese money.
    1
  16442.  @D.P.617  I'm frankly disappointed with Singapore's government choosing to slap sanctions on Russia. Sanctions don't help anyone and neither do they actually work. Sanctions make life more difficult for the ordinary Russians and I thought the Singapore government were smarter than that, to be able to seem through Western propaganda. There's this Chinese post on Weibo: 俄乌之战，目前听到最简单、最精辟之语: 美国点火💣 俄罗斯开火💥 乌克兰着火🔥 印度观火🌋 中国降火❤‍🔥 台湾玩火♨️ 还有……新加坡引火上身 🙀 The Ukraine war: American litted the fire Russia started the fire Ukraine caught fire India looking at the fire China putting down the fire Taiwan is playing with fire Singapore gets itself on fire
    1
  16443.  @martinfiedler4317  The status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to its constitution, then by default Taiwan is part of China and any move to declare independence would be taken as changing the status quo (an outcome that many people in Taiwan do not support.)
    1
  16444. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16445. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  16446. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16447. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  16448. 觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  16449. 觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16450.  @billyehh  Manufacturers may be diversifying but China remains the factory of the world. For example, Apple supplier Foxconn has pulled out of a $19.5 billion chip making plant deal with India.
    1
  16451. +Norsemen88 Democracy has long history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, Republic of Rome fell. Modern democracy only has 100-200 years of history, and it's no guarantee that it will survive in future. But China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history.
    1
  16452. Norsemen88  What do you mean China did nothing under 2000 years of imperial rule? Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions 四大发明 which have greatly influenced history. Paper and Printing made recording and transmission of knowledge much easier. The Compass made navigation much easier and journeys more safer and Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. Yet you claim China did nothing for 2000 years of imperial rule? China has long survived the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 and today China is world's 2nd largest economy, so why do you still say China is going to collapse?
    1
  16453. @Norsemen88 Where would the West be today if not for Chinese inventing Paper and Gunpowder? With paper, information spread more quickly thanks to this inexpensive material and paper banknote help speed up business transactions and made it less of a hassle to carry metal coinage and precious stones. Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, porcelain (precious china) were in great demand by Westerners and a trade route was even set up and named Silk Route in honor of the precious material. Besides Gunpowder, Chinese also invented handcannons, handgrenades, fragmentation bombs, landmine, naval mines, exploding cannonballs, rocket launchers, multi launch rocket systems and of course fireworks. There was even an ancient Chinese flamethrower capable of launching continuous stream of flame just like the ones used in WWII. Your Western society was built upon the backs of African slavery, genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, occupation of their lands even till today, plundering resources like gold, from the Native Americans, Asia (India, Hong Kong, Singapore, etc) and Africa. Westerners are rich today because you are sitting on a pile of wealth thanks to your ancestors stealing from Asia, Africa, America and Australia. Yet you still call Chinese people your "friends"? As for democracy, I have shown that it has a history of failure, just like when Republic of Rome fell, so there's no guarantee that it will succeed in future, given the history of democracy. Whereas Chinese civilization has survived 5000 years through violent course of history and is still alive today and we are the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's manufacturing hub, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, and a potential rival to the USA.
    1
  16454. +Norsemen88 said "神州 Shenzhou The only reason china has developed is because we let you join the WTO" China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate us as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because United States, European countries, and Japan requested that China first reform our economic policies. The United States imposed additional conditions on China, and when China joined the WTO, we agreed to considerably harsher conditions than other developing countries. So the USA is clearly no friend of China, despite you people claiming to want to "help" China. Look at President Trump just unilaterally slapping tariffs on steel and aluminum like that, without even going through the official WTO channels? China has submitted complaints to WTO over the US tariff measures on Chinese goods. Source: China files WTO complaint over the United States’ tariff measures on Chinese goods wto.org/english/news_e/news18_e/ds543rfc_05apr18_e.htm
    1
  16455. +Norsemen88 Where would the West be today if not for gunpowder, helping Britain colonize America, Africa, Asia and Australia? Thanks to Chinese invention of gunpowder, you Westerners were able to subjugate other continents, giving you an advantage over Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, and allow you import slaves from Africa to do laborious work for you. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners using our inventions? Your lands are not your own, they belong to Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals. Your resources are not your own, they are stolen from Native Americans, from Africa and Asia. Your science, mathematics, and astronomy actually have roots in Asia (India) and technology like gunpowder actually came from China. So aren't you Westerners stealing other people's lands, resources and ideas yourselves?
    1
  16456. +Norsemen88 You Westerners have been taught that Caucasian history is superior over all others, that Caucasian culture is superior to Asian culture, African culture, Native American culture and Australian Aboriginal culture, but look at the truth of what you did to Asia, Africa, America and Australia? Yet you still believe yourself that the West is superior because of innate abilities? In 19th century, Britain was colonial superpower, but was overtaken by USA in 20th century. But China had been a superpower for 1800 years prior to the 19th century (according to Angus Maddison) so what makes you think US supremacy will last? China is rising rapidly and many scholars believe that the 21st century would belong to the Asians. Global GDP from 1 - 2000 AD (by Angus Maddison) wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA_Middle_East.png
    1
  16457. +shockwave2291 China today is hardly communist and some scholars believe China is in fact more capitalist than even some Western countries. And Chinese people have been governing ourselves for 5000 years without democracy, so why is there a need to adopt democracy then, when it has history of failure. Chinese dynasties have fallen and risen again, divided and unified again, and China has survived the violent course of history relatively intact to the modern day. For example, Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, Northeastern China, Southern China, Hong Kong, Hainan Island, etc, are all part of China today, whereas the Roman Empire has fragmented into individual countries like United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Turkey, Egypt, etc. And Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. Here is compiled list of what Western journalists have to say about China's economy. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? But its already 2018, and China's economy is still going strong, despite what those Western economists say. It shows that Western predictions about China's economy have been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years! Yet you still think China's economy is about to collapse?
    1
  16458. +nowisthetimetochange China survived 5000 years of authoritarian rule, so why can't we continue this form of government, since history has shown it to be successful? I mean, many other ancient human societies adopted a system when political power is concentrated in the few instead of the many, whether it is nobles (aristocracy) priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy). Throughout history, such systems were popular and common, because they were stable and they worked! So why can't China follow this system when it has been successful for thousands of years? I agree that it wasn't a smooth history either, and we were invaded by Mongolians and Manchu. But in the end, the Mongolian and Manchu rulers assimilated into Chinese culture and that's why territories like Inner Mongolia and Manchuria are part of China today. And Chinese "empire" today is consists of Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, Northeastern China, North China, Southern China, Hong Kong, Macau, Hainan Island, etc. so we have survived the violent course of history relatively intact. But look at Roman Republic having since fallen and disintegrated into various countries like United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Turkey, Israel, Egypt, etc.
    1
  16459. +Rajshri Ingle "it is the largest democracy in the world, and we are trying to unite with Pakistan." Why Indians even allow Britain to partition British India in 1947 into two sovereign countries, India and Pakistan? And then India supported Bangladesh independence from East Pakistan, creating another sovereign country, and making Pakistan suspicious of India's intentions. You Indians willingly gave up your own original territories to form Pakistan and Bangladesh, and once you lost control of them, they may exist to become a thorn in your side. That's why China fight so hard to retain control of Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong and exert control over Taiwan. We don't want Taiwan declare independence and we end up fighting each other, like what India and Pakistan are doing today today. A country is strong if unified, and weak if divided and fighting amongst ourselves. The difference is that India willingly gave up its land to form Pakistan and Bangladesh, but China still fights to retain control over our territories.
    1
  16460. +Rajshri Ingle That's because Indian leaders like Gandhi and Nehru were mostly pacifist, and frankly speaking, they were pushovers, so they allowed the British and Jinnah to divide British India into Pakistan and India. Had you a strong leader that insisted that British India remained unified after independence, then so much unnecessary bloodshed and wars between India and Pakistan, could have been avoided altogether, had Indians insisted on remaining unified after independence. But its no use now, and Pakistan is its own sovereign country. Why not cooperate together to make Asia great, instead of fighting among yourselves? Why not mend relations with your brother state Pakistan? For example, Pakistan has come onboard China's Belt and Road Initiative for mutual prosperity, and China has extended the invitation for India to join in BRI. But thus far, India has rejected this invitation and China respects this decision.
    1
  16461. After WW1, the Western powers gave away Chinese province of Shandong (which had been captured by Germany during WW1) to Japan, instead of back to China, even when China was part of the Allies during WW1.
    1
  16462. China controls 80-90% of the world's rare earth metals production, which are used in high tech devices, that's why decoupling from China is simply impossible, as even Western diplomats have admitted.
    1
  16463. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16464.  @intothewrx  In the past, Hong Kong was once a prosperous port city under authoritarian British colonial rule, while the mainland was still dirt-poor at that time. However, fortunes have reversed today and Hong Kong has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan and is facing increasing levels of competition from other upcoming mainland port cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian. Source: Wikipedia: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports Source: Wikipedia: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage#2012%E2%80%932017 No wonder why the people of Hong Kong feel like they are being left behind as mainland cities start surpassing Hong Kong.
    1
  16465.  @parkerhughes434  "神州 Shenzhou Just curious, what happens to you in China if you speak out against a political official that doesn't align with the governments self promoted image?" As long as your criticism is valid and possibly substantiated by proof (i.e corruption, forced evictions, unpaid wages, environmental degradation, etc) then the authorities will look into the matter. But personal insults and verbal abuse for no rhyme or reason aren't tolerated. "Like an athlete speaking out against an official due to their previous relationship or a comedian making jokes about Xi Jinping, what happens?" If you're referring to Peng Shuai's relationship with a much older man, again, this is her private matter with him, and doesn't have anything to do with the West. Peng Shuai has expressed her desire for her privacy to be respect, but it appears that Western MSM are demanding that she bare her life details for all the world to see. As for a comedian making jokes about Xi Jinping, this isn't tolerated. It's similar to disrespecting your parents, or a well respected figure, for the sake of fun, not for any valid criticism.
    1
  16466.  @parkerhughes434  "Why not? And if someone has an issue with an ideology in itself, where there's no substantiated proof and as is simply a subjective opinion, are they able to speak their minds?" I am talking about Personal Insults and Verbal Abuse (which you clearly quoted: 神州 Shenzhou "But personal insults and verbal abuse for no.rhyme or reason aren't tolerated.") against a person, not an ideology, but now you are changing it to someone having an issue with an ideology in itself? "Also, if hypothetically Peng Shuai did not wish to have privacy and continued to detail her relations with a government official, would the CCP allow her to speak further?" Peng Shuai can always send emails to WTA (and she has done so) and the CPC actually doesn't really care about Peng Shuai's private affairs (it's other country's media that's pressing Peng Shuai for details), but if the WTA is trying to politicize the issue by threatening to pull China tournaments then it's clearly politicizing the issue.
    1
  16467.  @parkerhughes434  "Can't disrespecting someone for the sake of fun be rooted in valid criticism? Also, what makes parents or respected figures exempt from disrespect or general criticism? I'm assuming they are the ones who decide?" Every country has their own sensitive topic that cannot be discussed in public. For example, the Communist Hammer and Sickle ☭ flag is banned in those former USSR countries like Ukraine, Lithuania, and also Indonesia. The Nazi Swastika 卍 is banned (outside of historical context) in Germany, France, Austria. China has our own sensitive topics and is no different in this regard.
    1
  16468.  @parkerhughes434  "神州 Shenzhou So you can't make personal insults or verbally abuse anyone in China without getting in trouble?" Against governmental figures mostly. It's similar to how In America, if an Anglo-Saxxon person walks into an African American neighbor and starts using the N-word to refer to people of African descent, they will inevitably get into trouble of some sort. "And the ideology segment is more of an extension of my question. For example, of you make fun of someone's political beliefs and ideology, is that a personal insult or verbal abuse?" "Make fun" as in mock or insult someone's beliefs? Then it would qualify as personal insult or verbal abuse, like degrading someone's religion or culture. "Also in regards to Peng Shuai, the CCP would allow her to keep posting publicly on Weibo if she wanted to? Her silence on social media and her public appearances have been her personal choice?" "Why ask the same question again since I've already answered it with "Peng Shuai can always send emails to WTA (and she has done so)"? Peng Shuai's previous relationship with a much older man has been revealed, so naturally she wants to keep a low profile and avoid the public eye for a while, until this all blows over.
    1
  16469.  @parkerhughes434  "神州 Shenzhou Americans disagree with those countries laws as well. It's the people who decide was is socially correct, not the government." But who are Americans to tell other countries laws are wrong? Those countries are not America after all, it's their country, their rules. Just like it's our country, our rules for China. You said: "China seems to have many sensitive topics that are illegal to talk about. That is very foreign to Americans because the United States is the king of sensitive topics, we just don't get into trouble for talking about them publically." There are things in America that are illegal to do, that can be done in China. For example, I've been to USA before and I found that in many states, you can't walk around in public with a open bottle or can of an alcoholic beverage, or the police will come arrest you. But you can do that in China, no problem.
    1
  16470.  @parkerhughes434  "Why are government officials exempt from personal insults or abuse?" The same way African Americans are exempted from personal insults or abuse from being called the N-word by non-African descent people. Yet oftentimes, many African Americans often use that same word to refer to their fellow people of African descent, there is clearly this exemption that exists in America. It's the same reasoning in many countries, including China. "Alright, and this is illegal to do in China?" According to China's Policies And Practices On Protecting Freedom Of Religious Belief, in exercising their right to free religious belief, believers should not interfere in the lawful rights of other people, or force others to believe in any religion. Believers should not discriminate against non-believers or believers of other religions. No one shall use religion to interfere in the lawful rights and interests of citizens. Believers should respect public order, customs, cultural traditions and social ethics in exercising their freedom of religious belief. "And I keep asking the Peng Shuai question because you are not answering it." I did answer it several times, but it's apparent that you refuse to accept my answer. And you even phrased it as a hypothetical example that's all, how to know for sure what's going to happen in such a hypothetical example? "I'm going to go ahead and believe it's safe to assume the CCP is not allowing her on Weibo or any social media for that matter, given her silence on all platforms. And is only given permission to send emails and make public appearances until approved by the CCP." Your assumption has a flaw because Peng Shuai has a Facebook account and she isn't responding on Facebook (which is beyond the Chinese government's control) either. Therefore it's far more likely that Peng Shuai is merely keeping silent on her own accord. "You must understand that this is very very foreign to an American." Even though there's clearly a flaw in your assumption, why do you think this very very foreign to Americans? Didn't the former U.S President Trump had his Twitter account banned, even until today?
    1
  16471.  @parkerhughes434  "That's a right we have, we can publically disagree with any law from any country we want... Overall, who are countries to tell Americans what we can or can't say?" Then why people like Edward Snowden (or Julian Assange of Wikileaks) exposed the U.S spying on it's allies, and monitoring their citizens conversations for keywords relating to terrorism, get treated as U.S fugitives? "This is true, but these laws are decided at the state level, just like how in some states it is safe to buy marijuana while in others it is not, but yes still an overwhelming majority prohibits public consumption of any drug including alcohol." It's the same in China, in the sense that most laws are decided at the state level, and supported by overwhelming majority of the public in China. If there's dissatisfaction or grievances, including corruption, forced evictions, unpaid wages, environmental degradation, ethnic protests, etc, then the public protest and the government pays attentions. "Now that's an interesting analogy for you to make, are you saying that public intoxication is as important to the Chinese public as freedom of expression is to the United States public?" Excuse me, but when did I ever mention anything about "public intoxication"? All I said was that in China, you can walk around with an open can/bottle of beer that's all, and nobody will come arrest you for it.
    1
  16472.  @parkerhughes434  "Unlike insulting the CCP in China, It's not illegal to say the N-word in the United States." Then why don't you go into the the African American neighborhood and say the N-word to people of African descent? Go ahead and film yourself doing that. Since according to you, that's basically insulting the African Americans, then it has the same level as someone insulting the Communist Party of China for no apparent reason. "the people control social change in the United States unlike China where it is controlled by the government." That's apparently not true. Look at the Black Lives Matter protests and what social change in the United States did that achieve? Americans got a nice new road, but otherwise, the situation of African Americans in the USA is the same. And from what I understand, polls shown that majority of American adults (around 63%) want universal healthcare for all, but this doesn't seem to be happening. "Are you really trying to say the Chinese government arrests and punishes people because criticism is like the N-word to them?" Now you're switching back to criticism when we had been talking about verbal abuse and personal insults all along? I've already explained earlier that as long as the criticism is valid and possibly substantiated by proof (i.e corruption, forced evictions, unpaid wages, environmental degradation, etc) then the authorities will look into the matter. But once again personal insults and verbal abuse for no reason aren't tolerated. "So it is illegal to criticize and degrade someone's beliefs in China, especially the CCP's, got it." You had previous quoted my whole text on China's Policies And Practices On Protecting Freedom Of Religious Belief what has that got to do with beliefs in the CPC? Why are you seemingly drawing random conclusions out of nowhere? "And about Peng Shuai, yes my question is hypothetical, but that doesn't detract from you avoiding the question in the first place. And that question, what would happen if Peng Shuai wanted to keep speaking on social media? Would the CCP step in to stop her or would they allow it? I think we all know what they would do, and you are just playing ignorant." Since you admitted that your question is hypothetical, then there's no true answer because it's impossible to know what the CPC would do in your hypothetical scenario. You can't prove that the CPC would step in to stop her or whether they would allow it, because it's a hypothetical scenario. "And why would Peng Shuai begin posting on Facebook, a banned website in China, when the CCP most definitely now has their eye on her? " Peng Shuai already has a Facebook account what do you mean by begin posting on Facebook? And since you claim it's banned website in China then all the more why wouldn't Peng Shuai post on Facebook? But the fact that she hasn't, clearly implies that Peng Shuai is trying to avoid the public eye and keep a low profile, so does your assumption work? "Yes Twitter, a private company, banned Trump from their platform as is their right. The United States government did not ban him because they do not have that right." So you're admitting that the corporations have the so much power, as to silence the former U.S President Trump (back when he was the still the POTUS)? Then this is a difference of power. In China, the Chinese government controls the Chinese corporations for China's benefit, reining in companies when they gone too far. Whereas in the U.S, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    1
  16473.  @parkerhughes434  Not just Julian Assange or Edward Snowden, there was this U.S Marine Corps lieutenant colonel Stuart Scheller who was fired after he posted a video demanding accountability from military leaders over the botched evacuation of Afghanistan. Video: Marine Officer Court-Martialed For Afghanistan Comments youtu.be/Kh_dB9tgNMQ I don't understand why you can continually preach about America's supposed "freedom of speech" when there's evidence to show that's not really the case. "What about political grievances, such as putting stricter term limits on Xi Jinping or lowering the government censors? How can the public share these grievances if they are being regularly silenced and censored?" While it's true that President Xi Jinping has removed the presidential term limits, but he still needs to be re-elected after every term of 4 years to keep his position. And the public can always go onto political forums in China if they want to discuss these issues with their provincial governments. And I really don't understand what you mean, which person in China has been silenced and censored for political grievances about President Xi's term limits? "are you saying that walking around with an open can/bottle of beer is as important to the Chinese public as freedom of expression is to the United States public?" No, I'm just saying it's something that you can do in China that you can't do in many American states, that's all. As for freedom of expression in China, I've already given examples that in China you can display the Communist Hammer and Sickle ☭ flag and the Nazi Swastika 卍 flag, which you can't do in some other countries like Germany, France, Austria, or Ukraine, Lithuania, Indonesia. It just goes to show that different countries have different levels of freedom of expression.
    1
  16474.  Moonland Almond  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China has nearly quadrupled from 3 million (1953) to 11 million (2020). That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    1
  16475. China is all about win-win cooperation for mutual gain, while the United States sees everything as a zero sum game.
    1
  16476.  @michaelkatz275  "The U.S. constitution has been in existence for more than 200 years." But it's remained pretty much unchanged. When is the last time the U.S made an amendment to it's constitution? Change is necessary to reflect to the times, even in the People's Republic of China, there have been amendments to our constitution. But the U.S's constitution has remained stagnant.
    1
  16477. In my opinion, it is those poor countries choice of which banks they want to acquire loans from. If they disdain and distrust the Western banks, then that means that they trust (or at least prefer) Chinese banks over them that's all. Otherwise, why they choose Chinese banks over Western banks, if our interest rates are so unfavorable as you claimed?
    1
  16478. Roshan Chachane But those countries still choose to acquire loans from Chinese banks after all. Because they live in volatile environment and no Western bank is willing to approve loans to Sri Lanka and Pakistan. You mock our bank's loans, but in the end, those countries still choose to borrow China, because we are willing to loan to them in the first place.
    1
  16479. Rolando Ariaga China supplies Chinese workers, because the local workers aren't qualified or experienced enough to build infrastructure projects themselves. China also supply building materials like cement because those countries aren't able to supply it themselves. For example, Pakistan doesn't have enough engineers or cement for CPEC, so Pakistan is planning to train more engineers from its universities and to double cement production. In the meantime, Chinese workers and cement are imported from China so that construction can begin, while Pakistan trains more manpower and produce more building materials to eventually take over in the future.
    1
  16480. Rolando Ariaga If low skilled workers can do a better job than local workers, then Chinese companies reserves the right to hire whomever they want. Its their business after all.
    1
  16481. You said you want to support your workers, but in your scenario, Walmart is going to suffer heavy losses and having to fire their own employees because of your actions.
    1
  16482. It is apparent that sanctions have had no effect on dissuading North Korea denuclearization, so why continue imposing sanctions knowing that it won't work? North Korea is targeting US military bases in South Korea and Japan, so what do you expect Chinese government to do about US bases? USA withdrawing its troops from those bases would do more to ease tensions along Korean Peninsula, than any sanctions China could ever impose. If same method doesn't seem to work, why not try different approach instead? Its crazy to expect repeated sanctions on North Korea is going to change its mindset.
    1
  16483. Since the 19th century, many have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many (but not all) to fathom.
    1
  16484. In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, whereas in USA, the U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit.
    1
  16485.  @viper6680  Therefore Singapore can be considered a single-party dictatorship under PAP, for more than 50 years already. In Singapore, you can be arrested for gathering in groups of 4 or more as "illegal assembly".
    1
  16486.  @michaelkatz275  So you're saying that those countries are swamped by a million Russians? Then why isn't the huge influx of Russians causing immigration and social problems in those countries?
    1
  16487. +Wenli Yang Ancient Chinese invented the crossbow Nu 弩 and also a variant of it, called the Repeating Crossbow 诸葛弩 (Zhuge Nu, named after Zhuge Liang) so a submachinegun crossbow isn't too far off the mark. As for mechanical horses and oxen, China did not have anything like that, but the closest equivalent is the unmanned crossbow chariot. This chariot doesn't require a driver, since the horse's tails are on fire, and the crossbows are triggered by rope connected to the wheels in such a way, that it will fire, after the wheel travels a certain distance.
    1
  16488. Capitalism is killing the planet, it's the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits at the expense of the environment with the eventual goal being the depletion of the Earth's resources. Communism is the belief that resources should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" (German: Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen)
    1
  16489. If you look at human history, most societies follow a dictatorship in which political power is held by a few people, whether its nobles (aristocracy), priests (theocracy), kings and emperors (monarchy). Its because such people are politically savvy enough to make important decisions regarding the country's future compared to the masses, making such forms of government stable. So why can't China pursue a form of government that many human societies in the past have gravitated to? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since faded to history. Chinese people have been governing our country ourselves for a very long time and will continue to govern ourselves, drawing upon experience from thousands of years of Chinese political literature.
    1
  16490.  @francisarinze6928  I don't have any particular link, but perhaps you could follow Prof Zhang Weiwei, who describes China's model of governance as a combination of Eastern meritocracy with Western democracy, a system he terms "Selection + Election" Selection: Candidates must take and pass various exams & tests to prove their competence (derived from the ancient Chinese Imperial Examination system) Election: Candidates must also prove persuasive enough to sell their policies to other communist party members, and garner sufficient support for their reforms (derived from Western process of election)
    1
  16491. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  16492. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China according to its constitution.
    1
  16493.  @item6931  Those people died during the Great Leap Forward because of bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it?
    1
  16494.  @item6931  Those people starved to death because of floods. In 1958, the Yellow River flooded which coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward, and this flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. Mass starvation ensued as a result of the Yellow River flood, and even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather.
    1
  16495.  @ph-free-blogger  "Taiwan just haven't got round to updating the 1947 constiution yet" So where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence then? Since there are no amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China according to its constitution.
    1
  16496.  @tearsyu5429  If those separatists want to declare independence, then they should get off the Chinese territory of Taiwan and claim some other plot of land for themselves. Because Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  16497.  @ColoniaMurder20  The current Taiwanese aborigines are descended from farmers from mainland China that migrated to the island some 5,000 years ago. Around 5,000 years ago, farmers from the southeast Chinese coast settled on the island. These people are believed to have been speakers of Austronesian languages, which dispersed from Taiwan across the islands of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The current Taiwanese aborigines are believed to be their descendants. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan.)
    1
  16498.  user-fk8nl5hn1v  If it was, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the UN? What's preventing it from doing so?
    1
  16499. ​ @ColoniaMurder20  "神州 Shenzhou we all know, how han chinese annihilated our ancestors in South China.. in our history Austronesian people in Maritime in Southeast Asia arrived during 4000 years ago" Han Chinese didn't exist 4,000 years ago. The Han Dynasty was founded in 220 BC and that's where the characteristics of Han emerged.
    1
  16500.  @ColoniaMurder20  "do you know why spanish took formosa island before? it's becuz of same people in Philippines Islands" Do you know why Han Chinese took Taiwan island? It's because of Qing Dynasty China under Manchurians, who declared China to be multi-ethnic state, and dismissed the idea of a "Han-only" China. After conquering "China proper", the Manchus identified their state as "China" (中國, Zhōngguó; "Middle Kingdom"), and referred to it as Dulimbai Gurun in Manchu (Dulimbai means "central" or "middle," gurun means "nation" or "state"). The emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, Tibet and other areas) as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that "China" only meant Han areas. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Qing dynasty)
    1
  16501.  @ColoniaMurder20  "and if you're han chinese.. you should know the conquest of han chinese in South China during ancient times." And if you're Filipino, you should know about American-Phillippine War leading to the death of 16,000-20,000 Filipino soldiers and 200,000–1,000,000 Filipino civilians, and the end result being Philippines becoming an American colony. Why remember so far back to ancient time, but forget what the Americans did to your people? (Also, like i said, Han Dynasty was in 220 BC which was around 2,200 years ago, not 4,000 years ago)
    1
  16502.  @ColoniaMurder20  "and how han chinese envy us becuz of our ancestors were great seafaring people" Great seafaring people? Haven't you heard of the Seven Voyages of Chinese Admiral Zheng He, sailing across the Indian Ocean?
    1
  16503.  @ColoniaMurder20  "神州 Shenzhou yes, we came from South China during ancient times" So your distant ancestors were from mainland China? And your ancestors migrated to South East Asia 5,000 years ago, long before there was any concept of Han Chinese in the first place (Han Dynasty was 220 BC) yet you're pinning the blame on Han Chinese? You said: "so you claiming all nation in Southeast Asia as part of China as well?" I never said that. However, the South China Sea islands are claimed by China. You said: "and also you claiming history of Austronesian people are part of China like how china claimed Tibetan people" Tibetans and Chinese do belong to the same Sino-Tibetan family of languages.
    1
  16504.  @chocomilo1628  "神州 Shenzhou wikipedia bro really" Wikipedia has its sources. The Dapenkeng culture in Taipei dated back to between 4000 and 3000 BC, and the inhabitants cultivated rice and millet, so most scholars believe this culture is not derived from the Changbin culture, but was brought across the Strait by the ancestors of today's Taiwanese aborigines, speaking early Austronesian languages.
    1
  16505.  @noname-dk7ri  The aborigine people living in Taiwan were descended from farmers from mainland China that arrived on the island some 5,000 years ago. Around 5,000 years ago, farmers from the southeast Chinese coast settled on the island. These people are believed to have been speakers of Austronesian languages, which dispersed from Taiwan across the islands of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The current Taiwanese aborigines are believed to be their descendants. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan)
    1
  16506.  @noname-dk7ri  You said: "Why do you request Taiwan? If China does not claim Taiwan as its own, everything will be solved." Taiwan was part of China since Qing Dynasty, so why should mainland China give up our territorial claims? Even today, the Republic of China 🇹🇼 claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory. Then can't the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 claim Taiwan?
    1
  16507. At 1:32:06 it appears that many South East Asian countries like Malaysia, Indonesia, The Philippines, etc, also voted against Russia, despite being part of the Global South (except Singapore which is part of the Global North)
    1
  16508. Even athletes from Taiwan can only compete in the Olympics under the name "Chinese Taipei". Because Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  16509.  @songrunner3027  "China is doomed. The next few years will vindicate that prediction." 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis. 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell Recession. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  16510.  @songrunner3027  "China is doomed." 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis. 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell Recession. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  16511.  @henrytep8884  Regarding the South China Seas, the Vietnam PM Pham Van Dong had accepted that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were Chinese territory, in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." ... (Source: Wikipedia: File:1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai)
    1
  16512.  @henrytep8884  Vietnam PM Pham Van Dong had accepted that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were Chinese territory, in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. ... (Source: Wikipedia: File:1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai)
    1
  16513.  @henrytep8884  Vietnam PM Pham Van Dong had accepted that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were Chinese territory, in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." ... (Source: File:1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai)_
    1
  16514.  @henrytep8884  "Shenzhou. THE PHILIPPINES has lost 3.6 million kilograms of fish due to the presence of Chinese fishing vessels in the West Philippine Sea," Where is the West Philippine Sea? There is no such sea called the West Philippine Sea, but there exists an internationally recognized sea known as the South China Sea. Also, does the Philippines claim all of the South China Sea in its entirety? Then how can they pin the blame on Chinese fishing vessels who are in areas in the South China Sea not claimed by the Phillipines
    1
  16515.  @henrytep8884  "Mr. Perez asked the government not to downplay the importance of fish products sourced from the West Philippine Sea. He said that if the area is managed well and limited to Filipino use, it can provide more than the government’s current estimate of 7% volume catch equivalent to P19.1 billion." But this unrecognized West Philippine Sea (i.e South China Sea) doesn't belong to the Philippines, there are other countries vessels fishing in the area, including Chinese, Vietnamese, Indonesian. If the entire South China Sea is limited to Filipino use, then it's they who will be stealing fish from China, Vietnam, Indonesia and others.
    1
  16516.  @henrytep8884  "Mr. Perez also raised concerns on the destruction of coral reef ecosystems in the Spratly Islands caused by China’s reclamation and dredging activities." Like I mentioned above, the Spratly Islands is not part of Philippines territory according to the 1898 Treaty of Paris, in which Phillippine's maritime boundaries are drawn which does not include the Spratly. You said: "An international tribunal issued a ruling in July 2016 that rejected China’s claim over the West Philippine Sea" What's the name of this international tribunal that issued the ruling?
    1
  16517.  @henrytep8884  You said: "Shenzhou. More than 200 Chinese fishing vessels were spotted anchored at Whitsun Reef, a disputed territory in the South China Sea," Whitsun Reef is part of the Spratly Islands, and the Spratlys is not within the Phillippines maritime boundaries, which were drawn up in the 1898 Treaty of Paris. The Republic of China 🇹🇼 (now Taiwan) published the 11-Dash Line in 1947 laying claim to the Spratly Islands. You said: "The fishing vessels were not seen conducting fishing activities," Even better, it shows that Chinese vessels were present there but not fishing at all.
    1
  16518.  @henrytep8884  "Shenzhou. lol you haven’t even gotten to the Korean yet huh." Because South Korea doesn't claim any fishing grounds in the South China Seas. The fishing ground in the Yellow Sea is located between mainland China and the Korean Peninsula so there's bound to be some overlap of fishing grounds between our countries.
    1
  16519.  @henrytep8884  Look, even your post says (and I quote your earlier words) "However, the EEZs declared by South Korea and China overlap in some parts of the Yellow Sea, a narrow body of water whose width ranges from 740 to 1,074 kilometers." Did you even read what you posted?
    1
  16520. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16521. Why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage; they were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were lousy, and they had far fewer numbers (only 50 communist members in 1921) over the Kuomintang. The KMT on the other hand, had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training, and far superior numbers over the the communists. Securing victory against the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT. Yet the communists survived all KMT attempts to wipe them out, employing strategies like "Long March" (长征) and despite KMT's initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan). This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland.
    1
  16522.  @Hanabis924  You said: "That doesn’t mean you label the whole country as nazi lovers." The ultra-nationalist, neo-nazi Azov Battalion is literally part of the Ukraine National Guard and have genociding the ethics Russians in Donetsk and Luhansk. According to UN figures some 13,000 civilians have been killed as a result of shelling (by both sides). Can you imagine if the neo-nazi elements of in your country manage to make it into your country's National Guard? This was the reason why an overwhelming majority of Crimeans voted to be join the Russian Federation, because they don't want to be ruled by the Ukrainian government installed by USA after the 2014 coup d'etat of Ukraine's government by NATO.
    1
  16523.  @GonzoTehGreat  If you disagree with the ethic group census in China, then perhaps you could offer your own statistics to counter mine?
    1
  16524.  @GonzoTehGreat  So you disagree with the ethic group statistics that the Uighur population in China actually increased from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020, then where is your alternative source? Could you show statistics that the population of Uighurs in China has decreased, instead of grown in size? China has even extended a formal invitation to invite Mike Pompeo to visit Xinjiang and see for himself that there are no human rights violations in Xinjiang. But Pompeo declined China's invitation to visit Xinjiang and insisted that there's genocide without proof. You claimed that genocide has a wider meaning, referring to destroying their culture and communities. But when I watch Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV, and they actually promoted Uighur culture, festivals, cuisine, traditional clothing, playing traditional instruments, song and dance. So how is China destroying Uighurs cultures when Chinese media is proudly showing off Uighur culture on their screens? How's that genocide?
    1
  16525.  @Hanabis924  While I agree that there was shelling on East Ukraine by both sides, both sides aren't losing the same amount of people. According to UN figures on the Donbas war, 80% of civilian casualties have occurred on rebel-held regions (Source: Aaron Maté And Richard Sakwa from The Greyzone). Majority of civilian deaths were ethnic Russians and the Russian language is being banned (at least in Eastern Ukraine). The Minsk agreement was signed to stop the fighting in Donbas and institute constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas. But Ukraine did not upheld their end of the Minsk agreement and continued their shelling of Donbas. In 2014, Crimea had a referendum and majority of those polled voted to join the Russian Federation (96.77%). And in Crimea, Ukrainians are allowed to retain their Ukrainian citizenship, however Russian citizenship is necessary to retain state jobs, such as those in teaching and health care, as well as to renew or obtain essential documentation such as passports, marriage licenses, driver’s licenses and vehicle registrations. Given that Crimea is de facto part of Russia, Ukrainians living in Crimea are considered foreign migrants as if they were living in Russia. Putin has publicly stated that Russia does not plan to occupy Ukraine, his objectives were to demilitarised and de-nazify Ukraine. Putin had previously asked for assurances that NATO would not expand eastwards (i.e that Ukraine not be allowed to join NATO). Many NATO countries also did not want Ukraine to join NATO, yet they refused to put that down on paper and assure Putin, and that's why Russia had their military intervention in Ukraine. If Ukrainian President Zelenskiy truly cared about his people, he would surrender Ukraine in order to minimise the civilian casualties, instead of forcing his people to die for his refusal to surrender. It's apparent by now that for all their talk, NATO and USA aren't going to send troops to defend Ukraine. Ukraine application to join NATO is unlikely to be fully approved, because that would mean NATO is obliged to send reinforcements to defend Ukraine, so I can't see that happening. By arming civilians with rifles and rocket launchers, he's attempting to maximise the civilian casualties. By removing the age restrictions for conscription, Zelenskiy is effectively enlisting child soldiers to fight and die for his refusal to surrender.
    1
  16526.  @GonzoTehGreat  So you dispute my ethnic census showing the growth of the Uighur population in China, then where's your alternative source? You don't have any source showing the statistics of the Uighur population in China? Not only did China invite Mike Pompeo, China also invited EU diplomats to visit Xinjiang and see for themselves that there are no human rights violations in Xinjiang. And there have been many YouTubers who visited Xinjiang and posted their videos on the life of the Uighurs without supervision. Check out Noel Lee's A Singaporean in Xinjiang series. Or numuves channel, he specifically travelled to Xinjiang to find those so-called concentration camps in Xinjiang. And again, what genocide by destroying culture? Just tune to any Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV and they showcase Uighur culture for all the world to see, including Uighur festivals, Uighur cuisine, Uighur traditional clothing, Uighur playing traditional instruments, Uighurs singing and dancing. How is this akin to destroying the Uighur culture?
    1
  16527.  @GonzoTehGreat  So you can't refute my point that according to China's ethnic population census, the Uighur population has since tripled in size? You can't refute the fact that China has extended invitations to Mike Pompeo and EU diplomats to visit Xinjiang and see that there are no human rights violations there? You claimed that foreigners need to be supervised if they visit Xinjiang, yet I've cited YouTubers who visited Xinjiang without supervision, and could not find any so-called "concentration camps". And you claimed that the term genocide has wider meaning, which includes destroying culture, but just look at Chinese media and they are promoting Uighur culture, festivals, cuisine, traditional clothing, traditional instruments, song and dance, then how does your allegations of genocide in Xinjiang still stand? Even according to a Guardian article, the International Criminal Court (ICC) claims that there is insufficient evidence against China and asks for more evidence on Uighur genocide claims before it will be willing to open an investigation into claims of genocide against Uighur people by China. The international criminal court (ICC) has asked for more evidence before it will be willing to open an investigation into claims of genocide against Uighur people by China, but has said it will keep the file open for such further evidence to be submitted. ... Source: The Guardian: ICC asks for more evidence on Uighur genocide claims
    1
  16528.  @GonzoTehGreat  So you literally have no evidence of genocide, you constantly dismiss my sources while being unable to produce your own. You dismiss the fact that China has been inviting Mike Pompeo and EU diplomats to visit Xinjiang and see for themselves that there are no human rights violations occurring there. China even extended an invitation to UN Human Rights Chief to visit Xinjiang, so what makes you claim China is trying to hide anything? I have shown that people have visited Xinjiang and uploaded their videos of their visit on to YouTube, so what makes you think foreigners who visited Xinjiang have to be supervised? Since the ICC has stated that there is insufficient evidence and have asked for more evidence before it will be willing to open an investigation into claims of genocide against Uighur people by China, then why are you jumping to conclusions that there's genocide in Xinjiang? Even if you're claiming China is destroying the culture, there's so many Chinese media showcasing Uighur culture, cuisine, festivals, traditional clothing, traditional instruments, song and dance, so how is China destroying their culture?
    1
  16529.  @GonzoTehGreat  "Where did I say this?" I never said that you said it, it's just that you're jumping to conclusions about genocide in Xinjiang, when the population of Uighurs in China tripled in size from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020, according to the ethnic consensus. You claim that China's statistics are unreliable (without giving a reason why) but you're unable furnish any sources of your own. You stated that genocide isn't just about deaths, it has a wider meaning referring to destroying their culture, yet if you watch Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV, they put Uighur culture on display for all the world to see, so how is this definition of a "cultural genocide" make sense at all? And if there was evidence, then why is it that the International Criminal Court stated there is insufficient evidence against China, and has asked for more evidence before it will be willing to open an investigation into claims of genocide against Uighur people by China?
    1
  16530.  @GonzoTehGreat  Earlier you said: "Genocide isn't just about deaths. It has a wider meaning and refers to the destruction of a people, obviously by killing them, but also by destroying their culture.." but when you turn on Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV and they proudly display Uighur culture, Uighur festivals, Uighur cuisine, Uighur traditional clothing, Uighur playing traditional instruments, Uighurs singing and dancing. So where is this so-called "cultural genocide"? You repeatedly dismissed Chinese ethnic consensus as unreliable but you never really explained why you claim it's unreliable, you just claim it is that's all. And as for Chinese media being biased, they are literally showcasing Uighur culture for all the world to see, then your point about "cultural genocide" doesn't really hold water, given that China is actively promoting Uighur culture, isn't it? And since according to ICC, there is insufficient evidence to warrant an investigation into claims of Uighur genocide, then according to Western rule of law, the suspect is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, yet why do many Westerners seem to believe genocide (whether cultural or not) is ongoing when there's insufficient evidence?
    1
  16531.  @GonzoTehGreat  What about China lobbying to recognise Uighur Muqam culture as UNESCO Intangible Heritage (since 2005 and finally granted in 2008)? This goes against the accusations of "cultural genocide" of China destroying the Uighur culture, if the government is lobbying to preserve it as intangible heritage.
    1
  16532.  @GonzoTehGreat  "神州 Shenzhou I've already addressed this in earlier replies, but I suggest you re-read my entire reply, not just the part you quoted." First you asked me to quote you, now you're asking me to re-read your entire reply? This is what you wrote: "FYI - Genocide isn't just about deaths. It has a wider meaning and refers to the destruction of a people, obviously by killing them, but also by destroying their culture via brainwashing, re-education and the dilution thru immigration. The CCP is responsible for carrying out all of these against the Uyghurs." So you're clearly jumping to conclusions about genocide in Xinjiang when there's insufficient evidence, even the ICC has asked for more evidence before it will be willing to open an investigation into claims of genocide against Uighur people by China. You said the census data is unreliable because it comes from a source with a vested situation in the situation, but the census was taken since 1953 before all these allegations of genocide appeared in the West. Furthermore, you're accusing Chinese census/media of having a vested interest, then shouldn't you apply the same standards to Western MSM reporting on the so-called allegations of genocide as having vested interests of their own? Just like you quoted I shouldn't trust Russian or Ukrainian reports, then shouldn't you extend the same to Western media as to what you did for Chinese media? As for Chinese media, the point remains that CGTN, CCTV, etc are showcasing Uighur culture, festivals, traditional clothing, playing traditional instruments, song and dance. You claim it's because of vested interests, but Chinese media ("state media" as the West calls it) is promoting Uighur culture, and telling Chinese that's its okay to appreciate Uighur culture, and for Uighurs to continue to celebrate their culture, so doesn't this go against the so-called "cultural genocide" narrative? Then there's the fact that China applied got Uighur culture to be recognised as part of UNESCO Intangible Heritage, so it appears that China is doing the reverse of cultural genocide, it's actually preserving it and promoting it.
    1
  16533.  @GonzoTehGreat  "神州 Shenzhou Now, you're deliberately misquoting me." Hey, did you edit your comment and changed what you said? You clearly said "The CCP is responsible for carrying out all of these against the Uyghurs." but now you've edited it to "The CCP has been accused of carrying out all of these against the Uyghurs."? Why'd you constantly ask me to quote your words yet after I quote them, you edit you comment and claim that I'm misquoting you?
    1
  16534.  @GonzoTehGreat  Look at your comment, it clearly has the (edited) tag attached next to it which wasn't there before. You've asked me to quote your words, and after I did that, you edited your comment and then accuse me of misquoting your words. Why resort to such dirty tricks such as asking me to quote your words and then editing your post?
    1
  16535.  @GonzoTehGreat  No, I clearly quoted your original words that you asked for. But you edited your comment, and changed the meaning of your words and then accused me of misquoting your words. Why resort to such dirty tricks like editing your comment and then accusing me of misquoting your words? I just looked over your ~20 (?) replies and counted about 13 of your posts with the (edited) tag attached. So more than half of your posts have been edited then what's the point of you asking me to quote your words, when you can just edit them at will, and claim that I misquoted you? Even if you claim that the Uighur genocide is not your point, your other point about Chinese ethics census and Chinese media being unreliable (because of vested interests you say) then can't the same be applied to Western MSM's negative portrayal of China, because they have a vested interest to demonise China to their audiences back home?
    1
  16536.  @GonzoTehGreat  Because you clearly edited your comment after I quoted the original words, in order to make it look like I misquoted you, that's why there's the (edited) tag next to your comment. Why resort to such dirty tricks like editing your comment and then accusing me of misquoting your words?
    1
  16537.  @GonzoTehGreat  Look, you just edited your latest comments again. Even earlier, you posted those same words to @Dan & Jo earlier, you wrote: "FYI - Genocide isn't just about deaths. It has a wider meaning and refers to the destruction of a people, obviously by killing them, but also by destroying their culture via brainwashing, re-education and the dilution thru immigration. The CCP is responsible for carrying out all of these against the Uyghurs." so why accuse me of misquoting your words, when you can just edit your comment and made it look like such? Again how is the evidence unreliable, just because it's from Chinese ethnic census or Chinese media? The Chinese census started back in 1953 long before the accusations of genocide and it clearly shows that the Uighur population in China have tripled in size over the years. Because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. And as for Chinese media, even if you claim it's unreliable, there are many expats that have visited Xinjiang and posted their videos on to YouTube (such as Noel Lee and numuves) and again their videos show Uighurs celebrating their culture, festivals, cuisine, traditional clothing, playing traditional instruments, song and dance. And then there's the fact that China applied for Uighur Muqam culture to be recognised as a UNESCO Intangible Heritage, so what cultural genocide are you talking about? And how did I shift the argument? You're claiming that Chinese statistics and media are unreliable because they have vested interests, then I'm saying that the same could be said of Western MSM having the vested interest to demonise China to their audiences back home. I mean, where do all the allegations of Uighur genocide stem from, if not Western media?
    1
  16538.  @Hanabis924  Russia is not part of Donbas so how can Russia implement the Minsk agreement? And I've already stated that there was shelling on both sides in Donbas so how is it one sided? Majority of the civilian casualties (80%) were on the rebel-held territories, and the ultra-nationalist, neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion have been shelling their own civilians in Donbas for 8 years, killing some 14,000 civilians. And the Ukraine government just close one eye to the them. You said: "96.77% from 125% registered voters" but where did you get your 125% from? The official result from the Autonomous Republic of Crimea was a 97% vote for integration of the region into the Russian Federation with an 83% voter turnout, and within the local government of Sevastopol there was also a 97% vote for integration of the region into the Russian Federation with an 89% voter turnout. According to you, Putin "claims 4 things: 1. Ukraine really belongs to Russian" but in actuality Putin said that the people in some parts of Ukraine, specifically the southwest, have called themselves Russian historically. Places like Crimea were never really part of Ukrainian history, and modern Ukraine's boundaries had been drawn by the Bolsheviks (who did it in a way that was extremely harsh on Russia). "2. Ukraine has been "hijacked by the West", That's true. There was a coup d'etat in 2014 ousting Ukrainian President Yanukovych by the USA, and the USA installed their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine. 3. Neo-Nazis run the country (which is false since the far right only got < 2% of the vote and no seats and the President is Jewish heritage). Putin said that banderites (Ukrainian ultra-nationalists) and neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion have infiltrated the Ukrainian National Guard, and carried out genocide against ethnic Russians in Donbas region, he never said that the neo-nazis run their government. And Zelenskyy being of Jewish descent doesn’t mean that their military does not have neo-Nazis. Just like America has a President of African descent doesn't necessarily mean that the U.S police doesn't have racism among its ranks. The Azov Battalion literally conduct marches with torches reminiscent of Nazi Germany marches and they even have Nazi symbols that were used by the Nazi SS. What's the 4th thing Putin claimed? Putin has made it clear that he wanted assurances that NATO would not expand eastwards (i.e that Ukraine not be allowed to join NATO). Yet his words fell on deaf ears and NATO continued expanding by incorporating 13 other countries. The purpose of this Ukraine conflict is to demilitarise Ukraine and de-nazify it of the neo-nazis and ultra-nationalists that's been carrying out genocide on ethnic Russians in Donbas region. You said: "If Putin really cared about civilians, he wouldn't bomb and shoot them (12 people at a bakery died because of Russian bombing)" Did you listen to Putin's speech? Russia wants to minimise civilian casualties, but the Ukrainian neo-nazis and ultra-nationalists are parking their artillery and multi-launch rocket vehicles in civilian areas and forcing the Russian Army to target those facilities. There's many fake news by Ukrainian government, such as the missile that slammed into a building in Kyiv and left a gaping hole in the apartment, that turned out to be an Ukrainian BUK missile that malfunctioned and hit their own apartment. You said: _"Russia woudln't break their promise TWO times for evactuations." Russia did allow for civilians to evacuate, its the Ukrainian ultra-nationalists that bombed the evacuation tracks and obstructed civilians from evacuating. There was even a negotiator from the Ukraine side that was assassinated by ultra-nationalists before he could negotiate with Russia. You said: "You're saying that Zelenskiy is maximizing civilian casualties is just wrong and demeaning to those that want to protect their county from being invaded by Russia." How am I wrong to point out Zelenskyy is maximizing civilians casualties by refusing to surrender? Do you see any way for Ukraine to turn the tides against Russia? It's apparent by now that NATO and USA aren't going to put their soldiers boots on ground and defend Ukraine. Ukraine's application to join NATO is unlikely to succeed, because that would mean NATO is obliged to send reinforcements to defend Ukraine and I just can't see that happening. So isn't Zelenskyy refusing to surrender just prolonging the war to maximise civilian casualties? You said: "Seems you are failing to see why the Ukrainians are putting up a resistance." Because they have no choice. Ukrainian men up to age 60 are forcefully conscripted because Zelenskyy refuses to surrender. By arming civilians with rifles and rocket launchers, Zelenskyy is attempting to maximise the civilian casualties. By releasing prisoners and arming them, Zelenskyy is attempting to sow chaos and make it difficult for Russians to distinguish the military from civilians. By removing the age restrictions, Zelenskyy is effectively enlisting child soldiers to fight and die for his refusal to surrender.
    1
  16539.  @thelegittaco974  Russia is always going to be regarded as the "big baddie" in the West, no matter what Putin does. NATO was created in response to rising Soviet military might, but after the USSR dissolution, NATO no longer serves any interests, except perhaps the U.S interests in maintaining global hegemony. In fact, Russia had once applied to join NATO is safeguarding the regional interests of Europe, but NATO flat out rejected Russia's entry into NATO. Yet at the same time, NATO is expanding eastwards in an attempt to surround Russia.
    1
  16540.  @repardation7409  神州 Shenzhou try 70 Try what 70?
    1
  16541. The problem arises when their wars are funded by printing dollars.
    1
  16542.  @ForOdinAndAsgard  "@神州 Shenzhou Historically only the Dutch were allowed to trade opium with China, get your facts together." Where did you obtain your facts? Wasn't Franklin D. Roosevelt's grandfather was an opium seller too?
    1
  16543. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16544. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  16545. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16546. Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16547. Even Canada acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16548. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16549. President Trump acknowledge the One China Policy after a phone call made to President Xi Jinping, so how is China wrong in claiming Taiwan? The most powerful man in the most powerful country acknowledged Jerusalem as capital of Israel, but he never even acknowledge Taiwan is independent.
    1
  16550.  GEO NEO  Let's get this straight, the USA nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki, mostly killing Japanese civilians; women, children, the elderly, and men unfit for active military duty. The vast majority of the Japanese military strength remained unaffected by the US bombings of Japanese cities, that's why Imperial Japan clearly refused to surrender even after 2 atomic bombings by the USA. It was actually the Soviet Invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria that was the last campaign fought of WWII that finally caused Japan to surrender, so if anything, we should be thanking the Communist Party of the Soviet Union for putting an end to the war.
    1
  16551.  GEO NEO  Grateful for what? The US atomic bombs on Japanese cities mostly killed Japanese civilians including women, children, the elderly, and the vast majority of Japanese military strength remained unaffected, so that's why Imperial Japan refused to surrender even after 2 bombs. It was the Soviet Union who fought the last campaign of WWII that finally got Japan to surrender, so shouldn't we be grateful to the Communist Party of the Soviet Union for putting an end to the war?
    1
  16552.  GEO NEO  USA and it's allies posed obstacles to China's entry into WTO, that's why we had a late entry in 2001, instead of being a WTO founding member back in 1995 when it was first founded. Because USA and it's allies thwarted China's attempt to join initially, so why should China be grateful to the USA?
    1
  16553.  @JessieSong0301  Patronising? Those employees aren't looking down on their boss, they just crave respect and recognition more than receiving a higher paycheck. I mean, what's the point of working for higher pay when you feel like you aren't getting the respect you deserve?
    1
  16554. 说真的，翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人太无知，已经被美媒洗脑了。怪不得中国为什么要设防火墙，就是因为外国弱智太多，免得把中国污染了。
    1
  16555. What national leader are you talking about? Also, Singapore joined the West in sanctioning Russia in 2022 and making an enemy out of Russia. Singapore is the only ASEAN country to have done so and in response, Russia put Singapore on a list of "unfriendly countries."
    1
  16556. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16557. +Daniel Vedberg Sekulic The Japanese also remember their wars by enshrining Class-A Japanese warcriminals in Yasukuni shrine after what they did during the war, and not just China, but Koreans themselves are also against the enshrinement of Japanese warcriminals in Yasukuni. I mean, why reward such people's behavior by enshrining their remains and worshiping them
    1
  16558. +Daniel Vedberg Sekulic Those people in China died from starvation, because of the Great Chinese Famine, of which is partially due to the weather conditions causing floods and drought, killing off crops, which was beyond Mao's control as a human. Also, Mao Zedong accomplished what the previous Kuomintang administration failed to achieve, that is to unify China under one banner, making him the founding father of the People's Republic of China. Which country would disrespect its own founding father? And that doesn't change that fact that Koreans are also protesting about Yasukuni shrine. I mean, even Emperor Hirohito himself is against the enshrinement of the Class-A Japanese warcriminals at Yasukuni. There is also a group claiming to represent Taiwanese aborigines led by politician Kao Chin Su-mei attempted to visit Yasukuni Shrine, with the purpose to request the removal of their relatives from the shrine, but were refused and they were blocked from entering Yasukuni by Japanese protesters and police.
    1
  16559. +Daniel Vedberg Sekulic What warcrimes did Mao Zedong actually commit? Those people died because of starvation, not because of warcrimes, so why sort of question are you asking here to warrant an answer from me? Since its my opinion, then why can't I be entitled to my own opinion? I have already shown that is not just the Chinese protesting about Yasukuni, but also the Koreans and a group representing Taiwanese Aboriginals. I never said anything about PLA being better than KMT here at all, so why are you talking about PLA and KMT here suddenly? I never said China has corruption, and in fact, China had corruption during KMT adminstration of mainland China (1912-1949) Before that, the Qing Dynasty (before 1912) had corruption in the government as well. Before Qing dynasty, the Ming dynasty was also heavy on corruption. You are correct that China has been this way, since the dawn of human civilization. But you are wrong that only be ruled by Power of Force, not belief, not cultural or social views. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since faded to history. But if this formula is successful to China's longevity as a civilization, then why can't China continue to follow our own path to success? Nobody says every country has to adopt Western democracy to be successful, and China is living proof of that. You claim I avoided your question, then aren't you also avoiding my question of "Which country would disrespect its own founding father?" Germany (Federal Republic of Germany) existed before Hitler so he isn't the true founding father of the nation of Germany here. I talk about founding fathers, but you talk about war heros and founding father of the 3rd Reich which are different matters from a nation's founding father. For example, Mao Zedong's face is emblazoned in all our banknotes, just like Americans have their presidents faces in their notes. Because those people are of great significance to the country. Like I said, which country would disrespect its own founding father? Can you actually name a country in the world that will disrespect is own founding father?
    1
  16560. +Daniel Vedberg Sekulic When did I said anything about ending China's Imperial Rule here? I am talking about the beginning of the Chinese Civil War, and it was KMT who started the civil war, when Chiang Kal Shek started purging communists during Shanghai massacre of 12 April 1927 (also known as "White Terror") Who started the Chinese Civil war then, if not Chiang Kal Shek? Mao Zedong managed to unify China from its warlordism, in which the previous KMT administration failed to acheive during Republic of China era (1911-1949) You talked about those millions of Chinese deaths, but they were during a civil war, so of course Chinese will be killing Chinese. Its like the American Civil War, where Americans killed Americans, isn't it? The first president of Finland is Kaarlo Juho Ståhlberg, not Tsar Alexander the 2nd. Cambodia's Khmer Rouge was overthrown by Vietnam, and the People's Republic of Kampuchea. Suffice to say, Pot Pol is not the founder of Cambodia. And like I said, Mussolini and Hitler are not the founder of Italy and Germany. Why don't you do the actual research to find out which country's founders are? Dalai Lama himself signed the Tibetan treaty, and Chinese did make new seals for the Tibetans, but these were just personal seals with each delegate's name carved on them. Other than this, there were no forged government seals. And it was the DL himself to accepted the Seventeen point agreement making Tibet part of China.
    1
  16561. +Daniel Vedberg Sekulic I am having a hard time following your English. The 17 Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet was signed by the Dalai Lama in 1951, in which the Chinese Civil war was already ended or at a stalemate after 1949 when Mao proclaimed China as the PRC. The Dalai Lama had in his possession the seal of the governor of Eastern Tibet but chose not to use it. That seal, however, was not the official seal of the Tibetan government, so not using it did not lessen the validity of the agreement. How did China betray the treaty by seizing and annexing Tibet? Tibetan government already signed the 17 Point Agreement, so what was there for PLA to seize? The Chinese civil war was messy period, and there were indeed many other factions fighting each other for control of China, besides the KMT and the PLA. But the fact remains that Chiang Kal Shek STARTED the war with the PLA by purging communists during Shanghai massacre. And since PLA emerged victorious and gained control over China, then why did you claim earlier that Mao directed unlawful war in China? China during this warlord period is so messy but its thanks to PLA that China is finally reunified again and the KMT failed to unify China at all during 1912-1949. Even Tibet broke free of China's rule in 1912, but was eventually brought back to China in 1951, after signing 17 Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet. Since you want to claim Chiang Kal Shek didn't do the killings, then I can also claim Mao Zedong didn't do the killings, those people starved to death under the Great Chinese Famine. I mean, you claim all this bad things of Mao Zedong, but if not for him, China would still be divided and fighting among ourselves and fragmented into various states like Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, etc. A country is strong when it is unified, and weak when its divided and fighting amongst themselves, like during warlord period. That was why a Japan was able to invade China and capture territories, because China is divided and fighting among ourselves. Even when the Japanese attacked, Chiang Kal Shek refused to ally with the communists against the Japanese, and two of his subordinates Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng had to kidnap him, in order to force Chiang into an alliance with Mao, and this incident is known as the Xi'an Incident. Otherwise, Chiang would have never allied with Mao against the Japanese.
    1
  16562. +Daniel Vedberg Sekulic Did you just copied an entire wall of texts (from somebody's argument) and just hope to explain why the treaty is illegal? Why don't you actually read what you posted instead and come up with your own argument? Accord to your post,"However, according to international law, this DOES NOT invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid." Since there was no physical violence against the signatories (Tibetan government and Dalai Lama) then isn't the treaty considered valid then? Why is it one moment you claim "The use of newly-made personal seals instead of official governmental seals was not legal." then when earlier you claimed "That seal, however, was NOT the official seal of the Tibetan government, so not using it DID NOT lessen the validity of the agreement." Aren't you contradicting yourself here? And PLA tropps did not initiate "physical violence" so as long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid isn't it? That's clearly what you said earlier. The government did not "alter the existing political system in Tibet." Tibet has its own political system and a new Dalai Lama in Tibet, so how exactly did China alter the political system in Tibet? Can you explain how China did not honor these commitments? According to statistics, Tibet's population was 1.14 million in 1951, but it has tripled to roughly 3.18 million Tibetans in 2014, and the population demographics are about 90% Tibetans and 8% Han Chinese. So why do you claim "As a result, Tibetans are now vastly outnumbered by Chinese migrants who receive preferential treatment in education, jobs and private enterprises." when Tibetans are still the majority in Tibet? Where's your statistical proof? Source:Facts & Figures: Tibet's population is.china-embassy.org/eng/zt/ChinasTibet/t427565.htm I have shown that over decades, Tibetans only had about 100 or so self-immolations. Look at India with over 1,000 self-immolations occurring every year. Isn't that a much more serious self immolation? You mean just because 100 Tibetans choose to self-immolate, means the 3,180,000 Tibetans must all listen to their demands is that it? What makes you think Tibetan self-immolators represent all of Tibetan's views? The United Nations still recognize that Tibet is an autonomous region of China. I mean, if you think that they don't, then why doesn't US President Trump bring up Tibet during his meetings with Chinese President Xi? Why don't Russian President Putin, or German Chancellor Merkel, or British PM Theresa May, bring up the issue of Tibetan independence to President Xi? When people draw the map of People's Republic of China, Tibet is always included as part of China. The Central Tibetan Administration is not even recognised as a sovereign government by any country (not USA, UK, France, Russia, Germany, China... even India, its host country) so what makes you think people will listen to its voice? If you want to know how Tibetans feel about China, then why not ask the Tibetans INSIDE Tibet, not the Tibetans OUTSIDE Tibet? Source:Central Tibetan Administration wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Tibetan_Administration The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) is a NON-GOVERNMENT organization, so it does not have the same powers as a country's government and therefore, cannot legally recognize Tibet as Independent. Even Britain and Russia had recognized China's suzerainty over Tibet in 1907 , Great Britain and Russia engage not to enter into negotiations with Tibet except through the intermediary of the Chinese Government, so how was Tibet recognized as its own independent state then? Can you provide actual Source:The Governments of Great Britain and Russia recognizing the suzerain rights of China in Thibet tibetjustice.org/materials/treaties/treaties12.html
    1
  16563. +Daniel Vedberg Sekulic You said you quoted actual parts of both those who are Tibetan in exile as well as law makers, but how do you expect me to know who said what, if you don't label them at all? I have read and pointed out contradictions in your statement (such as saying on moment that "The use of newly-made personal seals instead of official governmental seals was not legal." then the next moment that "That seal, however, was not the official seal of the Tibetan government, so not using it did not lessen the validity of the agreement." So how do you expect me to know who said what when you don't label them? You claimed the Tibetans claimed duress when PLA troops occupied Tibet, but you said so yourselve that "However, according to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid." So since the PLA troops occupied that territory, but did not resort to violence against the signatories, then the agreement is still valid, according to your words. How did China broke our agreement? Could you be more specific about which part that China did not honor our agreement? The Panchen Lama was delegated by the Daial Lama to sign the agreement, and the Dalai Lama even sent a letter indicating his acceptance was also sent to Beijing in the form of a telegram on 24 October: "The Tibet Local Government as well as the ecclesiastic and secular people unanimously support this agreement, and under the leadership of Chairman Mao and the Central People's Government, will actively support the People's Liberation Army in Tibet to consolidate national defence, drive out imperialist influences from Tibet and safeguard the unification of the territory and the sovereignty of the Motherland." -Telegram from Dalai Lama to Beijing on 24 Oct 1951. I did not copied my statements about building universities and other modern technology from any source, and they are my own statements. Tibet has 5 universities and they were all established ONLY after they became part of China in 1951. That means under the Dalai Lama rule, there were NO universities in Tibet at all, Source:List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet The Tibetan Flag is illegal, because Tibet is autonomous region of China, and not its own independent country. I mean, which country formally recognize Tibet as independent? I have shown that even Great Britain and Russia recognized China's suzerainty over Tibet, so when was Tibet ever independent? Does President Trump of USA recognize Tibet as Independent? Does Russian President Putin? Does German Chancellor Merkel? Does British PM Theresa May? I mean, you claim China's occupation of Tibet is illegal, then why aren't USA, Russia, UK, etc, bringing up the issue of Tibet, during all those UN summits and meetings? You said the Tibetans get heavily discriminated by the Chinese government but how? I have shown that the population of Tibet has tripled from about 1 million in 1952 to about 3 million in 2014, with 90% of the population being Tibetans and only 8% Han Chinese. Its because Tibetans are exempted by the One-Child Policy (which only affect Han Chinese) and they can have as many children as they want. Tibetans enjoy special healthcare benefits and educational bursaries. For example, if Han Chinese require, say 600 points, to qualify for a university course, then Tibetans need only 400 points (easier) to qualify for the same course as Han Chinese. Tibetans also enjoy free education up to university and special tax exemptions that Han Chinese do not get to enjoy. So how exactly are Tibetans discriminated? In Religion? Here is a video about a foreigner's experience in Lhasa, Tibet, and you can see that so many Tibetans are prostrating themselves in prayer. The guy has been to Tibet before 10 years ago, and he remarks upon how much Tibet has changed, being more touristy now. Video:Welcome to Lhasa Tibet - Exploring the City (by Vafa Anderson) youtu.be/J-TfN56ETVM?t=301 I mean, if you really think that the 17th point agreement is illegal (and you believe you have enough evidence to prove your case) then why doesn't anyone directly confront the Chinese government about 17th point agreement then and bring China to court? Nobody stopping your countries from bringing up Tibet issue to the International Court of Justice for example. And in virtually every map of PRC drawn, Tibet is always included as part of China.
    1
  16564. +asd That's exactly the problem with the Westerners. They despise people who live off welfare, like Muslim refugees, but also cannot tolerate hardworking Chinese (or other Asians) who migrate to their country, but work to eat. They claim international Chinese students are displacing their Caucasian graduates in school, and Chinese scientists, researchers, programmers and doctors, are displacing their Caucasian peers in the same field. I was quite shocked to discover that even the prestigious Harvard discriminate against Asian Americans applicants and rated them lower than others on traits like positive personality, likability, courage, kindness and being widely respected. Harvard Rated Asian-American Applicants Lower on Personality Traits nytimes.com/2018/06/15/us/harvard-asian-enrollment-applicants.html
    1
  16565. I would even wager than Chinese know more about the United States than Americans know about China.
    1
  16566.  @tongeen  The communists have transformed China from a previously poverty-stricken, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy (in fact, the world's largest economy by purchasing parts parity) the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest military, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the CPC.
    1
  16567.  @tongeen  Communists have transformed China from a previously poverty-stricken, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy (in fact, the world's largest economy by purchasing parts parity) the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest military, the People's Liberation Army.
    1
  16568.  @tongeen  In 1951 the Tibetan themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Even the 14th Dalai Lama ratified this agreement through telegraph later that same year. Countries all over the world recognize Tibet as part of China when they draw the map of China.
    1
  16569.  @tongeen  You said: "Too bad, Japan lose to the US in WW2" Imperial Japan refused to surrender even after Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It was the Soviet Union's invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria that was the last campaign fought of WWII, and finally brought about Japan's surrender in 1945. So if not for the Soviet efforts during WWII, we would be speaking German and/or Japanese today.
    1
  16570.  @Time4Peace  Recently, Shenzhen had to undergo lockdown too because of Covid (Omicron variant too) and yet they have successfully brought cases down to zero and reopened. So if anything, it just shows it's possible to maintain a zero covid policy as long as it's properly implemented in China.
    1
  16571. ​ @Time4Peace  "Therefore the elderlies must all (with exceptions on medical ground) be vaccinated first and then the rest of the population." That's basically a vaccine mandate in itself, but contrary to popular Western opinion, China does not impose mandatory vaccination. "Studies also show that those who are vaccinated are less likely to pass the virus to others and if they get the virus" It's basically the same as a zero Covid policy, you are less likely to spread the virus if you have zero cases. "You cannot keep keep the population open without such preparation." It is possible to do so, and Shenzhen had managed to control the outbreak (Omicron variant too) and reopen. "It's not life vs business but life vs livelihood." Once again, the lost of income and money is regrettable. But money loss can be earned back later. But once those elderly lose their lives, then no amount of money can buy back lives that have been lost.
    1
  16572.  @Time4Peace  "Therefore the elderlies must all (with exceptions on medical ground) be vaccinated first and then the rest of the population." That's basically a vaccine mandate in itself, but contrary to popular Western opinion, China does not impose mandatory vaccination. "You cannot keep keep the population open without such preparation." It is possible to do so, and Shenzhen had managed to control the outbreak (Omicron variant too) and reopen. "It's not life vs business but life vs livelihood." Once again, the lost of income and money is regrettable. But money loss can be earned back later. But once those elderly lose their lives, then no amount of money can buy back lives that have been lost.
    1
  16573.  @kammonkam4905  "Stop gaslighting the non Chinese here with your cultural exceptionalism and racial stereotype. I am Chinese and your fortune cookie trope makes me cringe" Seriously, I never actually brought up race here, and here you blatantly using Asian stereotypes yourself like "fortune cookie" and accusing me of being racist?
    1
  16574.  @Time4Peace  "神州 Shenzhou If some nations can get 95% to 98% of elderlies vaccinated without vaccination mandate, why not China?" China has the world's largest population at 1.4 billion people, and our elderly population is dispersed all over the country, whether it's on a remote village in the mountains, or a vast farmland in the rural countryside. Just because other countries are capable of achieving it, you expect the same of China? Furthermore, from what I understand, in Western countries the virus was allowed to spread rampantly, so it's possible that the elderly felt the urgency to vaccinate themselves. Whereas in China, the government had handled the initial Covid-19 situation so well, then perhaps some elderly did not feel the urgency to vaccinate, as compared to their counterparts in the West.
    1
  16575.  @matpk  Chinese passport isn't particularly strong, the Western passport is typically stronger.
    1
  16576. 说得对，其实开始的时候，武汉市政府蛮不称职的，但中央的防疫已经救了他一命，但他还是忘恩负义。
    1
  16577.  @mechinizer6911  You keep on saying all those foreign companies are leaving China. But China's production of rare earths is cheaper than USA and if China bans export of rare earth, those same companies will find it increasingly expensive and difficult to operate with the high prices of rare earths in USA. China's affordable rare earth would prove an incentive for those companies to return to China to set up shop here.
    1
  16578.  Cyber Clown  Anti-China sentiment is growing in Australia, even though Australia is located closer to Asia than America and China is Australia's biggest trading partner. Yet Australian politicians like Scott Morrison are fanning the flames of anti-China sentiment and following US's anti-China stance. Do Australians themselves know that they will be at the frontlines if conflict breaks out in Asia?
    1
  16579. ROC (Taiwan) claims all of mainland China, (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, etc) as part of its territory. Taiwan claims territory belonging to modern day Mongolia, Burma/Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan as part of its territory. Source:Map of ROC administrative and claims wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg
    1
  16580. The Leader China can support 20% of worlds population with only 7% arable land, and still have surplus for export to other countries.
    1
  16581. 峻松宁 其实，不只是要翻出来，也要懂英文才能理解西方媒体对中国的傲慢与偏见。
    1
  16582. Agreed. Some people can see through Western anti-China propaganda, but still fall victim to Western anti-Russia propaganda. Others can see through Western anti-Russia propaganda, but still fall victim to Western anti-China propaganda. It takes a rare individual like Brian Berletic to see through both the anti-China and anti-Russia propaganda by the West.
    1
  16583. "Any countries not willing to participate are threatened with many sanctions." But isn't USA the country that impose sanctions on North Korea, on Iran Nuclear deal, on Russia annexing Crimea, etc? Even now, President Trump just unilaterally slap tariffs on steel and aluminum, without going through the proper World Trade Organization channels, and many countries are lodging complaints to WTO about US's tariffs.
    1
  16584. ​ @7Dorie Yet Canada is making enemies everywhere. From arresting Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou, to accusing Indian government of assassination, to imposing sanctions on Russia. Canada has literally made enemies with half the BRICS member countries.
    1
  16585. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiment in the West against Russia and China. And it's having the effect of pushing both our countries closer together than we've ever been.
    1
  16586.  Karen Xitler  Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chine Famine, caused by bad weathers conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests for China.
    1
  16587. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  16588. Agreed. In Chinese culture, in the case where a person really wants to insult someone else, the insult is usually accomplished through more indirect and subtle means.
    1
  16589. +Vinh Bảo It is Vietnam's choice to send mail order brides to other countries, including Western countries, so why can't China take advantage of Vietnam to solve our gender imbalance issue?
    1
  16590. If it weren't for the One Child Policy, China today would be just like India, suffering from overpopulation, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, insufficient food to feed our huge population, insufficient schools to send our kids to. But Western people have the privilege of being born into a country with enough food to eat, safety and security from threats, access to education, healthcare, etc, yet they still want to criticize the One-Child Policy from a morally high ground?
    1
  16591. +Gorden Sek Prior to the British Opium war, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want Western goods, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China, and forced Chinese people to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to pump the poison throughout rest of China, and Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. I mean, why the British people can do whatever they want to other countries? Look at Britain colonizing America and Australia, causing genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, and then occupying their lands (till today) plundering resources like gold, and importing slaves from Africa to labor for them. That's why most of the world speaks English today, because Britain forced other nations and cultures to learn their language.
    1
  16592. +O mg 你的话好感动哦，但有可能她听不懂中文，所以就置若罔闻。
    1
  16593.  @fictionaddiction4706  What's the point if your family is still dirt poor and unable to feed multiple kids? In the past China was still dirt-poor country, suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems at that time. Why allow families in China to raise multiple kids, only for them to starve to death, succumb to childhood diseases, and having not enough food, not enough hospitals, and not enough schools to send them all to? Why not make families focus all available resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood, and get him into a good school? That's a where One-Child Policy comes into place. According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Look at India, world's 2nd largest population country, and India is suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems that China once suffered from in the past.
    1
  16594.  @sleeptimestory01  About the One Child Policy, in the past China was still dirt-poor country, suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems at that time. Why allow families in China to raise multiple kids, only for them to starve to death, succumb to childhood diseases, and having not enough food, not enough hospitals, and not enough schools to send them all to? Why not make families focus all available resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood, and get him into a good school? According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Look at India, world's 2nd largest population country, and India is suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems that China once suffered from in the past.
    1
  16595.  @juliie007  A birth rate of 2.2 still runs the risk of China being overwhelmed by our population, it was One Child Policy that arrested China's birth rate and allowed poor families to raise a single healthy child into adulthood and enroll him in a good school. There are always ways to solve the gender imbalance problem. For example, lonely rural Chinese men are purchasing mail-order brides from places like Vietnam at prices of ¥20,000. Source: Business Insider: Rural Chinese Men Are Buying Vietnamese Brides For $3,200
    1
  16596.  @lilyslimegacha8399  "神州 Shenzhou OMG imma girl and reading this sounds sooo sexism" Look at India, world's 2nd largest population country and India has higher gender imbalance ratio of 1.08 compared to China's 1.06. And that's without population control policies in India, so its the culture that promoted the idea of gender, not the One Child Policy.
    1
  16597.  @lilyslimegacha8399  "神州 Shenzhou … still not a good excuse" China was dirt-poor country suffering from high child malnutrition, high illiteracy, high child mortality, why should China allow families to raise multiple kids, only to be unable to feed them, clothe them, send them to hospitals, send them all to school? Why not devote all available resources into raising a single, healthy child into adulthood and enroll him in a good school?
    1
  16598. Turns out Trump has a good idea about how the Mafia works and therefore will apply it to the rest of the world.
    1
  16599. Turns out Trump has a good idea about how the mafia works and therefore will apply it to the rest of the world.
    1
  16600. Well, if foreign companies want to come to China and set up shops, parks and a Disneyland in Shanghai, then it is almost expected that such companies have to cater to local tastes. Just like when Chinese immigrants left for America and set up Chinese restaurants there, they adapt Chinese cuisine to local tastes, birthing a whole new category of Chinese food called American Chinese. It's the same when American companies come to China.
    1
  16601.  @Jasmineisnotonfire  About censorship of flags, in other countries, the Nazi Swastika 卍 flag is banned, for example in France, Germany, Austria, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, when taken outside of historical context. Even the Communist Hammer-and-Sickle flag of the former Soviet Union is banned in some countries like Ukraine, Germany, Hungary, Indonesia, etc. But in China for example, you can display the Communist Hammer-and-Sickle flag proudly and no one will come arrest you for this. Besides, you can always watch Top Gun in its original length in the USA (in Netflix or other streaming websites I presume), what's the big deal when movies get edited to be shown outside of the USA? You can still watch the original in your country. About American manufacturing moving a lot of their jobs to China because its cheaper, that's just part of capitalism. After a job interview of two candidates, if one candidate is willing to work for lower pay than the other, the company hiring will choose the candidate with lower salary right?
    1
  16602. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16603. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16604. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16605. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, if you read its constitution.
    1
  16606. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China, if you read its constitution.
    1
  16607. If you read its constitution, Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16608. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16609. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China, no doubt about it.
    1
  16610.  @stoa7302  Exactly. In China, the Chinese government controls the corporations to rein in their power from time to time. Whereas it's the reverse in America, and it's the corporations that control the government.
    1
  16611. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  16612.  @ICreatedU1  Why'd you deliberately leave out the first part of my sentence? That other guy said that he had a bad reputation of not paying his attorneys, so even if you quote all the money in the world, if he doesn't pay his lawyers well, then shouldn't it be rather easy to land him in jail? Why keep bringing up rich and powerful people when the point remains that he was a cheapskate? You said: "You make it sound like "bad reputation" is enough to land anyone in jail, as if money, power and political clout were utterly insignificant." Once again, did you read my full sentence? I said that he has a bad reputation when it comes to paying his attorneys, so why bring up money, power, etc when the point was that he was stingy in paying his attorneys?
    1
  16613.  @ICreatedU1  You said: "Another gem of yours. "I hear you don't like to eat broccolis..." Did you even read what he wrote in that other post that I was referring to? You most likely can't because its been sensored, but he was calling out Putin was "arresting" the opposition. But now he's cheering on the same thing that's happening in the USA, so how is this a fallacy on my part? If you haven't even read his other post, then please don't act as though you know the context of the conversation when you clearly don't. After all, you do seem to have a habit of taking specific lines of mine out of context.
    1
  16614.  @freedumb_3.0  You claimed that he paid hush money to an adult actress, but was he doing it for his own personal reasons? Like perhaps he doesn't want his family finding out? If so then how is this an offense liable to getting him convicted?
    1
  16615.  @SenorJuan2023  By "election interference" you're probably referring to the now debunct "Russiagate." The Mueller report never found conclusive evidence of a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign. The full John Durham report said the FBI should never have launched an investigation into alleged Russian collusion with the Trump campaign, given the slim evidence.
    1
  16616.  @SenorJuan2023  By "election interference" you're probably referring to the now debunct "Russiagate." The Mueller report never found conclusive evidence of a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign and the full John Durham report said the FBI should never have launched an investigation given the slim evidence.
    1
  16617.  @SenorJuan2023  If by "election interference" you're probably referring to the now debunct "Russiagate." The Mueller report never found conclusive evidence of a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign.
    1
  16618.  @SenorJuan2023  If by election interference, you're referring to alleged Russian collusion with the Trump campaign, then the Mueller report never found conclusive evidence any collusion. The full John Durham report even said that the FBI shouldn't have initiated an investigation given the slim evidence.
    1
  16619. Even the United States acknowledged that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16620. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16621.  @freedumb_3.0  "Shenzhou. If someone covers up hush money payments... that could also be considered illegal... This is what Trump did, which is illegal.. Daniels claimed she was paid hush money to keep quiet about an affair with Trump," Trump wasn't even named as a defendant in Daniel's lawsuit, and it turns out it wasn't he who paid the hush money, it was his former attorney Michael Cohen that did so. So how does that constitute an offense in which he has to be convicted?
    1
  16622.  @freedumb_3.0  "You are also ignoring the fact that his lawyer went to jail for the same crime that he was charged with." Because it was Cohen who paid the hush money to Daniels and covered it up, not Trump. Even you said that the if someone covers up hush money payments, that could also be considered illegal, and that Daniels claimed she was paid hush money to keep quiet about an affair with Trump. But like I said, it was Cohen who did that, not Trump.
    1
  16623.  @freedumb_3.0  "Then there is the matter of him stealing money from his charity." Trump has agreed to pay $2 million to 8 separate charities for his misuse of charitable funds. And according to US law, a candidate having a criminal record doesn't affect his eligibility. You said: "One side wants to charge him for those crimes, and the other side is willing to overlook those crimes." Have you considered the fact that some people on side that wants to charge him is also politically motivated to do so? For example, Jan 6 was 4 years ago, why is the media suddenly focusing on it after Trump announced his candidacy?
    1
  16624.  @freedumb_3.0  Hitman? Nobody was killed what are you talking about? Cohen was the one who paid the hush money to Daniels and covered it up, not Trump.
    1
  16625.  @freedumb_3.0  And my statement is that according to US law, a candidate having a criminal record doesn't affect his eligibility as a presidential candidate.
    1
  16626.  @freedumb_3.0  Again, because it was Cohen who paid the hush money to Daniels and covered it up, not Trump.
    1
  16627.  @MarkYeung1  Again, it's because Ukraine is in a warzone and Putin evacuated those children to safety in Russia. Some of these children are orphans, so Putin is offering to accept them as Russian citizens. And if he was creating obstacles for their return, then why has Putin returned 387 children back to Ukraine? The ICC is not part of the UN, how can it speak on behalf of the UN regarding Putin? Whereas the International Court of Justice (ICJ) is a recognized UN agency, that's why South Africa is making that case to the ICJ regarding the conflict in Gaza.
    1
  16628.  @freedumb_3.0  Again, the court ruled that it was Cohen that paid the hush money and covered it up, not Trump.
    1
  16629.  @freedumb_3.0  Trump did not pay the hush money and covered it up, it was Cohen that did it.
    1
  16630.  @freedumb_3.0  His lawyer was the one who paid the money and covered it up, not him. Show me where did he ordered for the money paid to be covered up.
    1
  16631.  @MarkYeung1  Because Ukraine is in a warzone and Putin evacuated those children to safety in Russia. Some of these children are orphans, so Putin is offering to accept them as Russian citizens. And if he was creating obstacles for their return, then why has Putin returned 387 children back to Ukraine? Also that court that issued the arrest warrant for Putin is itself not part of the UN, so it doesn't represent the UN views. It's the ICJ that's the recognized UN organization and that's why South Africa is presenting its case on the conflict in Gaza to the ICJ.
    1
  16632.  @MarkYeung1  Some of those children that Putin evacuated are orphans, so Putin is offering to accept them as Russian citizens. And if they have parents/relatives, Putin is returning them to Ukraine as he has already done for 387 children. Also that court that issued the arrest warrant for Putin is itself not part of the UN, so it doesn't represent the UN views. It's the ICJ that's the recognized UN organization and that's why South Africa is presenting its case on the conflict in Gaza to the ICJ.
    1
  16633.  @Leo-n7o1e  Iran received Putin with full military honors, soldiers on horses/camels, and fighter jets flew by trailing smoke in the colors of the Russian flag 🇷🇺. Developing countries are welcoming Russian foreign minister visit to their nations. Many countries are also applying to join the BRICS, of which Russia is the chairman this year in 2024. Doesn't sound like the country is being isolated at all. Probably in the west maybe, but not on the world stage.
    1
  16634.  @effusivefugitive  Yeah I couldn't care less about the hush money too, it's his private affair but the media is trying to call attention to it to stoke resentment against him. As for the subversion of an election, didn't the Durham report conclude that there was no collusion with Russia during his presidential campaign in 2016?
    1
  16635. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16636.  @effusivefugitive  Yeah I couldn't care less about the hush money too, it's his private affair. Trials take time yes, but don't you find it convenient that suddenly, all those charges against him suddenly appear right after he announced his candidacy in the upcoming US presidential election? As though it's been expedited for political reasons.
    1
  16637.  @prestonyoung3807  It could take years yes, but why all those charges against him suddenly appear right after he announced his candidacy in the upcoming presidential election? It's as though the process been expedited for political reasons to coincide with election season in the US.
    1
  16638.  @barquerojuancarlos7253  It's funny how some Westerners accused Russians of having "mobile crematoriums," yet despite this technology, the Russians somehow couldn't get rid of the bodies in Buca, and had left them lying strewn on the streets for the Ukrainian forces to "discover" and incriminate Russia. It makes no sense.
    1
  16639.  @MarkYeung1  Carnivals like the Richmond Night Market are basically "tourists traps" where street vendors deliberately jack up the prices of what would have been otherwise cheap street food, and the carnival exists for a limited period. Whereas in China, not only is the street food cheap and tasty, it's available virtually all year round.
    1
  16640.  @MarkYeung1  If you really had many street food restaurants or food courts in Toronto that are cheaper than carnivals, then why do people still flock to carnivals like Richmond Night Market, since you claim it's available all year round? In China, not only is the street food cheap and tasty, it's available virtually all year round. You can't say the same for in Canada or the United States.
    1
  16641.  @MarkYeung1  There's this Canadian vlogger, Trevor James, (The Food Ranger) who does vlogs on the various cuisines of different countries and he definitely had a blast in China because of the cheap and tasty street food, available all year round. In his visit to Xinjiang, the Uighur samosa (烤包子) was so irresistible that he had to have seconds. Video: BEST Street Food in China | PLUMP and DEEP Tandoori Bao's on the Silk Road! youtu.be/RUGNrv596O8 (By the Food Ranger)
    1
  16642.  @MarkYeung1  The Food Ranger even visit Beijing and ate jianbing (煎饼) and Peking Duck. Video: DEEP Chinese Street Food Tour in Beijing, China | BEST Unknown Street Foods + PEKING DUCK youtu.be/jKXOh5wrzK4 (By the Food Ranger)
    1
  16643.  @MarkYeung1  You should come to China (home of Chinese cuisine) and enjoy the Chinese food here. It's authentic, cheap and available all year round, why should I spend money to come to Canada just to eat Chinese food?
    1
  16644.  @MarkYeung1  But even you admitted that the Canadian Food Ranger, Trevor James, can't find certain food not available in Canada. The variety of Chinese cuisine in China is much greater than in Canada. Cheaper and tastier too, not to mention that it's available outside of carnivals, unlike in Canada.
    1
  16645.  @MarkYeung1  Hong Kong food culture is actually from the Cantonese food culture from the Guangdong province. In fact you can actually find Cantonese cuisine in Guangdong province that's cheaper than in Hong Kong.
    1
  16646.  @MarkYeung1  But aren't we talking about Chinese/Asian food, not Canadian food? You can find Sichuan Rabbit Head on the street in Chengdu, as Trevor has found. Video:youtu.be/BviguZMY9AE
    1
  16647.  @MarkYeung1  Guangdong province is literally the origin of Cantonese cuisine, and the best province for authentic Cantonese cuisine, as compared to Hong Kong, which had Western influences introduced into their food culture while it was a colony in the past. And yes, Guangdong food is certainly cheaper than Hong Kong food.
    1
  16648.  @MarkYeung1  Is there something wrong with eating Rabbit head? Rabbit meat is eaten in the West, even Britain and Canada have rabbit stew recipes.
    1
  16649.  @MarkYeung1  But the rabbit head literally contains rabbit meat itself, so why is it horrible? It shows that when an animal is killed for its meat, nothing goes to waste.
    1
  16650.  @topsuperseven7910  So the People's Republic of China isn't a century old yet, but Hong Kong will eventually by fully returned back to China by 2047 (once the Sino-British declaration finally expires 50 years after the 1997 handover). By 2049, China is expected to have surpassed the United States both militarily and economically, so Taiwan would have no US ally and reunification between Taiwan and the mainland is largely believed to be inevitable.
    1
  16651.  @topsuperseven7910  It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set, and many economists predict that China's economy will surpass the United State's economy in the foreseeable future. It's many Westerners that are living in denial of the thought of country like China eventually surpassing the USA someday in the future. Taiwan can't even govern themselves properly, you think they stand a chance of taking on the mainland? Why hasn't the Nationalist Kuomintang that fled the mainland to Taiwan, fulfilled their promise to someday retake the mainland?
    1
  16652.  @topsuperseven7910  China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period, but today under the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 (1949~) China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made-in-China) having world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-China propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  16653.  @Charles-tt3jr  "神州 Shenzhou I will not allow to tell me what I should consider and what not!" You won't allow to tell yourself what you consider and what not? I'm just asking whether you consider the Confucius Institutes (孔子学院) as NGOs that's all. It's a simple question.
    1
  16654.  @Charles-tt3jr  Did I ever dictate what you said? All I'm asking is whether you consider the Confucius Institutes as NGOs, a simple question is all.
    1
  16655.  @Charles-tt3jr  Please quote me where did I ever dictate what you said? All I'm asking is whether you consider the Confucius Institutes as NGOs, a simple question is all.
    1
  16656.  @madrigale6396  Personally, I hope Mongolian government sees the value in preserving and promoting the Mongolian script among it's populace. Hopefully the ethnic Mongolians in China could impart some teaching experience.
    1
  16657. Fear of China and Russia has been driven in part due to the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West)
    1
  16658. Russophobia and Sinophobia in the West are driven in part by the Red Scare and Yellow Peril mindset.
    1
  16659. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China surpassing the West, is too frightening for many to fathom.
    1
  16660.  Dumb & Dumber  Hong Kong has been freed of the Hong Kong rioters that were sponsored by the USA.
    1
  16661.  Dumb & Dumber  Hong Kong is already free from the rioters.
    1
  16662. Even the United States acknowledged that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16663.  @timmyg44  At least it shows that President Xi is aware of the problems China is facing and that the Chinese government is working to fix them. But for comparison, what is President Biden's New Years message? That he's eaten pasta, chicken parmesan and we mustn't forget ice cream too!
    1
  16664.  @timmyg44  At least it shows that President Xi is aware of the problems China is facing and that the Chinese government is working to fix them. But for comparison, what is President Biden's New Years message?
    1
  16665.  @timmyg44  It shows that President Xi is aware of the problems the country is facing. But if you compare that to the New Years message from Biden, he's seemingly unaware of America's woes and instead talks about having eaten pasta, chicken parmesan and ice cream.
    1
  16666. China: Turning fantasy into reality. United States: Turning reality into fantasy.
    1
  16667. China's Metaverse aims to turn fantasies to reality. The U.S's Metaverse aims to turn reality into fantasies.
    1
  16668. China is transforming cyberspace into reality. The U.S is transforming reality into cyberspace.
    1
  16669.  @CyrusJanssen  When errors like "@UCtK9Hi%F0%9F%98%828pr8fr8L_rfgyBaMQ" appears, it means that the original comment has been deleted at the time you posted your reply.
    1
  16670.  china is in decline  More like Taiwan is a county of China
    1
  16671.  @edmurks236  "神州 Shenzhou Russ doesnt even like the Chinese he called them "rat f**kers"" That's such a derogatory term to refer to our people
    1
  16672.  @petersinclair3997  Taiwan was part of China since Qing Dynasty. If you look up a map of Qing Dynasty, Taiwan is part of their territory.
    1
  16673.  @petersinclair3997  "No. However, both China and Taiwan were provinces of Manchuria." The Manchu conquerors of Qing Dynasty used the name "China" or "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their country. After conquering "China proper", the Manchus identified their state as "China" (中國, Zhōngguó; "Middle Kingdom"), and referred to it as Dulimbai Gurun in Manchu (Dulimbai means "central" or "middle," gurun means "nation" or "state"). The emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, Tibet and other areas) as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that "China" only meant Han areas. They used both "China" and "Qing" to refer to their state in official documents. In the Chinese-language versions of its treaties and its maps of the world, the Qing government used "Qing" and "China" interchangeably. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Qing Dynasty)
    1
  16674. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  16675. Even the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16676. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  16677. The true double standard is that the U.S had many illegal invasions of countries yet wasn't sanctioned by the UN the likes of which Russia is being subjected to today.
    1
  16678. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16679. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16680. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  16681. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16682. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16683. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16684. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16685. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  16686.  @sirvidia  Look at what happened to journalists in Muslim countries Saudi Arabia and the Crown Prince can get away with murdering journalists like Khashoggi. Thank heavens she was doing journalism in China and not in Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia. And my point still stands, she is breaking Chinese laws while on Chinese soil.
    1
  16687.  @SonuOfBostonia  President Trump deported illegal immigrant parents and put their kids detention camps. It was also reported that dozens of children living in migrant detention centres did not have access to basic sanitary supplies such as soap and toothpaste. Source: globalnews.ca/news/5429194/trump-migrant-detention-rationale-experts/ Lawyers who visited facilities described squalid conditions to the Associated Press. The conditions at the station in Clint, Texas, included inadequate food, lack of medical care and older children trying to care for toddlers. In one case, attorneys said a two-year-old boy without a diaper was being watched by older kids. Several had the flu. Many were separated from extended family members like aunts and uncles who had brought them to the border; others were teenage moms with babies. There have also been deaths at the detention centres.
    1
  16688.  @d3rpypanda208  China is providing free education and job skills training to prepare these Uighurs for the workforce. Under traditional Muslim beliefs, most parents don't send their kids to school to receive a proper education, instead they stay at home all day and read the Quran (Islamic Holy Book) until they grow old enough to help their parents sell kebabs by the roadside. That's why many of them are adults, because their parents refuse to send their kids to school during the schooling age.
    1
  16689.  @TheFozzir   It's our country, our laws. Why come to China and break our laws by passing off as a tourist when you're a journalist?
    1
  16690.  @SonuOfBostonia  You were the one who said Trump did not create detention camps and I have cited Trump's detention centres, yet you don't even acknowledge it? And Chinese journalists don't go to America and air out their dirty laundry, so why are you imposing American journalists behavior on Chinese journalists?
    1
  16691.  @wisopr1993  What truth? Who is that mysterious voice on board the train? They just record some unnamed voice, distorted it and as pass it off as an Uighur and you believe it to be the truth?
    1
  16692.  @sufansufan5224  China is providing free education to these Uighurs and teaching Uighur kids Mandarin Chinese, Chinese history and singing patriotic songs about China. I mean, don't American kids also learn English at school, American history as well as singing patriotic songs about America?
    1
  16693.  @TheFozzir  How is this human rights abuse? China is providing free education and job skills training to these Uighurs (who harbor extremist tendencies) and setting them on the right path as productive members of society, instead of letting extremist thoughts cloud their views. How many thousands of lives will be saved thanks to China reeducating these Uighurs?
    1
  16694.  @SonuOfBostonia  Where's your evidence to prove Muslims are being electrocuted? What about those poor parentless kids in US detention centres being forced to fend for themselves and even some deaths in those facilities? And Hong Kong was taken from China by the British. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even after Britain renounced ownership over it's former colonies, Hong Kong wasn't even fully returned back to China.
    1
  16695.  @lisaishere0919  It's our country, our laws. You can try going to Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia and complain about politics and Islam and see if the authorities come after you.
    1
  16696.  @TheFozzir  If you disagree with China's methods, then what exactly do you propose to solve the problem? Look at the West and it is estimated that around 4,000 people have left their homes in the West to migrate to ISIS. Many have become jihadist fighters in the apparent hope of achieving martyrdom. Source: Why Are Westerners Attracted to ISIS? theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/07/isis-foreign-fighters-political-pilgrims/399209/ If you do nothing about it, then obviously, nothing will change and more Western people become radicalised and flock to join the terrorist's cause. What China is doing is preventing such misguided people from being led astray by extremism by giving them a proper Chinese education (being taught Mandarin, Chinese history, singing songs to cultivate a sense of nationalism) so that when they graduate, their employment options are broader, rather than choosing terrorism.
    1
  16697.  @sufansufan5224  Many of the schools are newly constructed (as shown in the video) so does the choice really matter? Most Uighur parents even refused to send their kids to school to receive a proper education, instead they stay at home and read the Quran all day. Look at the graph at 8:00 for example, and Uighur preschool enrollment increased by 148% and Xinjiang preschool enrollment increased by 82% so isn't this a good sign? Before this program started, Uighur preschool enrollment rates were abysmally low, because Uighur parents aren't sending their kids to school in the first place.
    1
  16698.  @lCaranorl  It was proven false that there was a massacre in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, and all eyewitnesses say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053
    1
  16699.  @sufansufan5224  Education is mandatory in China, and all citizens must attend school for at least nine years, known as the nine-year compulsory education, which is funded by the government. Compulsory education includes six years of primary education, starting at age six or seven, and three years of junior secondary education (junior middle school) for ages 12 to 15. So why can't we force these kids to enroll in school? Their parents aren't doing these kids a favor by not sending them to school.
    1
  16700.  @sufansufan5224  US President Trump separates parents from kids, by deporting illegal immigrant parents and then housing their kids in detention camps with horrible conditions. it was reported that dozens of children living in migrant detention centres did not have access to basic sanitary supplies such as soap and toothpaste. Source: globalnews.ca/news/5429194/trump-migrant-detention-rationale-experts/ The conditions at the station in Clint, Texas, included inadequate food, lack of medical care and older children trying to care for toddlers. In one case, attorneys said a two-year-old boy without a diaper was being watched by older kids. Several had the flu. Many were separated from extended family members like aunts and uncles who had brought them to the border; others were teenage moms with babies. There have also been deaths at the detention centres. So who can guarantee in that school there are no child abuse, or even worse children being killed?
    1
  16701.  @billt7283  Who was that mysterious voice on board the train? VICE News just distort the voice of someone and claim that it was made by "Uighur" and you people just believe this? This journalist even masquerade as a tourist in China, so she is actually breaking Chinese laws while in China.
    1
  16702.  @Aniketshyam  Why don't the Indian PM tell the Indians when to pee and when to s**t? At least China's mass surveillance and Social Credit System can catch those misbehaving Chinese who do those unsavory things in public, and then penalize them. But in India, the people are so free that they can defecate everywhere, anytime they want.
    1
  16703.  @sidwu6022  那你来说一说谁为了上YT被抓到? 那你来说一说谁为了上YT被抓到?你所说的治安条例是什么呢？说出来听听吧。
    1
  16704.  @sidwu6022  我也问过你谁为了上YT被抓到坐牢，你为什么不回答我的问题呢？
    1
  16705.  @sidwu6022  其实很多人已经翻墙了很多次，都没被警察抓到坐牢。更何况的是很多老外来到中国，可是还需要上FB、YT、谷歌、etc，也学我们翻墙，但也没被抓，那你还有什么好说呢？
    1
  16706.  @sidwu6022  西方也有很多人非法下载音乐，但为什么西方警察还不抓呢？明明是犯法，但很少人被抓，所以还有什么好说呢？
    1
  16707.  @awanderingmonk828  The Uighur reporting this is a liar. She crossed the border illegally into neighboring Kazakhstan and Kazakhstan government wanted to deport her back to China (which is what you do to illegal immigrants) so she desperately cooked up a false story of being a staff at Xinjiang reeducation school and described fake atrocities to slander China and draw international attention to her plight.
    1
  16708.  @VergilDarkslayer  Still no evidence even after searching? It's been years since Donald Trump was elected president, yet no single move being made against Clinton for corruption?
    1
  16709.  @VergilDarkslayer  About democracy, why do people think that allowing ordinary people to participate in political decision-making is a wise idea? There are several flaws in allowing ordinary people to vote in elections. -Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (e.g they may not turn up to vote or they may submit blank votes) -Ordinary people may base their votes on emotions, not logic (e.g Many British don't like immigrants, so majority voted for Brexit) -Ordinary people are susceptible to foreign influence (e.g Russian interference in US elections) -Ordinary people may simply lack political awareness of the country's situation, to make informed decisions about the country's future. Why not let those who know how to govern, govern? That's what China is doing and look at how successful China's political system is. The Chinese Communist Party is a meritocracy in which our leaders are promoted based on performance, not popularity like in a democracy. Video: TED talk: Eric X Li: A tale of two political systems youtu.be/s0YjL9rZyR0
    1
  16710. China is already home to the world's largest telescope on Earth. The Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST, also known as "Eye of the Heavens" 天眼) has more than 2.5 times more sensitive than the Arecibo Observatory, which means that FAST can see fainter sources from farther away. FAST also has a greater effective collecting area (71,000 square meters), than the 305-meter-wide Arecibo (50,000 square meters).
    1
  16711. A recent survey for kids showed: Most Chinese kids' dream: Astronaut Most American kids' dream: YouTuber Source: nextshark.com/survey-youtube-stars-astronauts/
    1
  16712.  @manu3939393  What makes you think YouTube is banned in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    1
  16713.  @tohrasup  The USA has only 4% of the world's population but is home to 25% of the world's Covid-19 cases.
    1
  16714.  @manu3939393  Banned means that it's illegal to access YouTube and you will get arrested for doing so, but which person in China has been arrested just for logging into YouTube while in China? What you meant was that YouTube was simply blocked in China that's all, but people can still access YouTube through VPN service. VPN services are cheap and accessible to many regular people in China, and it actually provides enhanced privacy protection for users, so what makes you think YouTube is banned in China? It clearly isn't, and nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    1
  16715.  @manu3939393  So according to your Cambridge definition, is YouTube forbidden in China? Obviously not. Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so? There are even Chinese YouTube channels like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV, and so on in YouTube, so how is YouTube forbidden in China, according to your definition? So many foreign companies come to China and set up shop here, and they require access to Western websites like Facebook, YouTube, Google to operate while in China, so the government issue VPN license to these companies. Of course the government will crackdown on illegal VPN providers, but as long as you use one of the government-approved VPN providers in China, then the government will leave you alone. But you may get arrested if you use illegal VPN providers while in China. And VPNs aren't terribly expensive in China, it's affordable to anyone who can afford an Internet subscription.
    1
  16716.  @manu3939393  Haven't you heard of 李子柒Liziqi's YouTube channel? Her YouTube channel has more than 2.3 billion views and 15.2 million subscribers, as verified on May 12th 2021, which is a Guinness World Record for "the most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube".
    1
  16717.  @manu3939393  You clearly stated the Cambridge definition of banned is "to forbid" so is YouTube forbidden in China? Obviously not, no one will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, so how is YouTube banned/forbidden in China? You said: "神州 Shenzhou Man I never said that people get arrested for it, stop twisting my words." but did I ever said you said people get arrested for logging into YouTube while in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, those are my words, not yours. CGTN, CCTV and Xinhua News do exist for Chinese people on YouTube, no one is stopping Chinese from watching those channels on YouTube. And the government monitors VPN providers and crackdown on those illegal VPN providers, but as long as you use a government-approved VPN provider in China, then the government will leave you alone. Also, what do you mean by "Are you this delusional to think they don't have a requirement for these providers to look into the data?!" As long as you have VPN in China, you can access Western websites like Facebook, YouTube, Google, how will the government restrict you from accessing those websites if you use a government-approved VPN? VPN improves privacy, this is true. I never said that you said VPN is expensive, I'm the one saying that VPNs aren't terribly expensive and beyond the reach of ordinary people. According to the following chart, around 90 million VPN users in China have accessed restricted social networks. blog.gwi.com/chart-of-the-day/90-million-vpn-users-in-china-have-accessed-restricted-social-networks/
    1
  16718.  @yslee1401  China has to host the world's largest population, so its possible that there are simply not enough resources, not enough schools, not enough jobs for everyone in China. With such a huge student population, competition for top schools and higher education is extremely fierce and intense here in China. Some students unable to apply for local universities, so they may choose to study abroad (especially if their parents have $$$) Some graduates unable to find work in China, so they seek employment opportunities abroad as well. That's why Western countries are positively flooded with Chinese international students, competing with local students in tests, exams, for university spots and even job offers when they graduate. If overseas Chinese can't find a job in the West, they are always welcome to come back to China (thus saving China the resources needed to train this student to university degree) and bringing foreign knowledge and technology to our shores. If overseas Chinese find a job in your country, they are depriving a Western graduate of a job, and if they rise to high position in corporate or government posts, then they might get approached by the communist party to be recruited as a spy in Western countries. Whichever way you look at it, China wins.
    1
  16719. China's farms are so efficient that China can feed 21% of world's population with only 7% arable land, and still have surplus food to export to other countries. Chinese farmer achieve this feat by cutting terraces into hills and mountains to create more arable land to grow rice. China is also world's leader in terms of agricultural output such as vegetables and has world's largest pig farm and sheep farm. In seafood industry, China provides 62% of the world's farmed fish and about 1/3 of world's entire commercial fishing industry. This is why China, for much of history, has maintained the world's largest population
    1
  16720. United States talk the Walk. China walks the Talk.
    1
  16721.  @ChiefCabioch  The so-called Chinese "debt trap" has actually been debunked by experts. In an article published by The Atlantic by Deborah Brautigam and Meg Rithmire, their research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country.
    1
  16722.  @ChiefCabioch  China's so-called "debt traps" have long been debunked. There's an article in The Atlantic entitled: The Chinese ‘Debt Trap’ Is a Myth by Deborah Brautigam and Meg Rithmire.
    1
  16723.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou My fiend, most of them died because of Mao's policies." That's just an Western accusation in their attempt to pin all the blame on Chairman Mao. There was a Yellow River flood which coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. In July 1958, the peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 m3/s (790,000 cu ft/s) with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kg/m3 (57 lb/cu ft), 14× and 24× their mean annual values, respectively. The flood water level was so high that it rose up to the top of the levee in several places. This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. It was reported as the most severe flood since 1933. You said: "Did you know that he had venereal disease when he died?" What has that got to do with Chairman Mao's contributions to China?
    1
  16724.  @bartonlee3594  About Intellectual Property, in 2020, China had the most patent grants worldwide with 530,127 patents granted to resident and non-resident companies or organizations. The United States followed with 351,993 granted patents the same year. Countries with the most patent grants in 2020 1. China (530,127) 2. United States (351,993) 3. Japan (179,838) 4. Republic of Korea (134,766) 5. European Patent Office (133,706) 6. Russian Federation (28,788) 7. India (26,361) 8. Canada (21,284) 9. Brazil (20,407) 10. Australia (17,778) ... Source: Statista: Ranking of the 20 countries with most patent grants
    1
  16725.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "The Ant debacle shows otherwise, in my view." Ant Financial's IPO deal would have not only added risk to the financial system, but there was growing concerns over Ant's complex ownership structure. The deal would have made 21 individual shareholders richer by at least $1 billion, further strengthening the capitalist control. The Chinese government wrested control away from the capitalists through the cancellation of the IPO deal. You said: "Also, the Evergrande and other construction-company near bankruptcies show that government housing policy has been a disaster." Home ownership in China has literally reached more than 90% (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019) and at the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations (Huang et al., 2020). So how is China's government housing policy been a disaster? The problem arises when there are too many houses bought for speculation on property prices, without anyone living in them. As President Xi Jinping said: "Houses are for living in, not for speculation! (房子是用来住的、不是用来炒的！)" so there needs to be government intervention to stop over speculation of housing prices. You said: "We DO have major monopolies in China that drag down economic growth while ratcheting up government debt." Yes, what needs to be done is to identify such bad actors and for government intervention to stop those monopolies and capitalists from attaining too much power (like they have done so in the West). You said: " The long-term policy of throwing money at new infrastructure no longer has much validity, in my view." Could you elaborate why you think so? Infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, are tangible assets that improve connectivity and contribute to improvement of living standards, so why are you of the view that they no longer have much validity? I'm willing to hear you out.
    1
  16726.  @ericreed4535  Besides having more STEM graduates than any other, China has also published more scientific research papers than any other in the world. List of countries by number of scientific and technical journal articles (2020) 1. China (744,042) 2. United States (624,554) 3. United Kingdom (198,500) 4. India (191,590) 5. Germany (174,524) 6. Italy (127,502) 7. Japan (127,408) 8. Russia (119,195) 9. France (112,838) 10. Canada (121,111) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by number of scientific and technical journal articles
    1
  16727.  @ericreed4535  In 2020, China had the most patent grants worldwide with 530,127 patents granted to resident and non-resident companies or organizations. The United States followed with 351,993 granted patents the same year. Countries with the most patent grants in 2020 1. China (530,127) 2. United States (351,993) 3. Japan (179,838) 4. Republic of Korea (134,766) 5. European Patent Office (133,706) 6. Russian Federation (28,788) 7. India (26,361) 8. Canada (21,284) 9. Brazil (20,407) 10. Australia (17,778) ... Source: Statista: Ranking of the 20 countries with most patent grants
    1
  16728.  @ericreed4535  In 2020, China summited more industrial design applications than any other in the world. Top 10 Countries by Industrial Design Applications in 2020 1. China (752,339) 2. Korea (64,00) 3. Turkey (42,073) 4. Germany (35,764) 5. France (29,572) 6. Italy (25,058) 7. Japan (22,392) 8. United States (21,686) 9. United Kingdom (21,361) 10. Iran (14,896) ... Source: Index Mundi: Industrial design applications, resident, by count - Country Ranking
    1
  16729.  @bartonlee3594  First you said: "The Ant debacle shows otherwise, in my view." now you're claiming "The crackdown on the financial sector has not been all bad, in my view." then what exactly is your view? It's like you can't even formulate an intelligent response regarding Ant Financial, just claiming it's a debacle without elaboration. You said: "HOW DOES ALL THAT SPELL SUCCESS?" Your point was that "government housing policy has been a disaster." but I've literally pointed out that China has around 90% home ownership (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) so how is the government housing policy been a disaster? Instead you just spew an entire rant on Evergrande that you copied from somewhere? Looking at all those square brackets [ ] in your post, did you just copy and paste a whole wall of text off Wikipedia? Corruption is a universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-corruption campaign to crackdown on corruption within the party. More than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption, including over 120 high-ranking officials, including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders, in President Xi's anti-corruption campaign.
    1
  16730.  @bartonlee3594  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal. ... Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses
    1
  16731.  @bartonlee3594  As the world's most populous country, China has statistically, the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses
    1
  16732.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "But you have to think of QUALTIY rather than QUANTITY of patents. Look at the figure for Japan, for example. it's just HUGE given the population of that country." Did you just contradicted yourself here? The first sentence claims it's about quality not quantity, yet in your next sentence, you literally pointed out how HUGE Japan's figure is, then what's your point when you're gushing over Japan's huge figure? China's figures still dwarfs Japans either way. And the number of patents coming from Taiwan Island didn't even make it to among the Top 10, so how is that impressive?
    1
  16733.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "The Great Leap Forward caused starvation that killed a lot of people." The Great Chinese Famine was caused by bad weather conditions like the 1958 Yellow River Flood (mentioned above) that submerged over half a million acres of crops, resulting in bad harvests and mass starvation. Also there were droughts in 1960 that further reduced grain in China, and the U.S also imposed embargoes on food exports to China, further exacerbating the starvation. You said: "Mao was unhinged in the last years of his life." More of your ad hominem attacks against Chairman Mao? Just like your earlier statement about "Did you know that he had venereal disease when he died?" what has this even got to do with his contributions to China? It's like you're just attacking him personally instead of debating seriously. You said: "the state introduced a system of compulsory state purchases of grain at fixed prices to build up stockpiles for famine-relief and meet the terms of its trade agreements with the Soviet Union." Well, isn't it good to build up a stockpile for famine-relief? Also the local provincial governments had grossly exaggerated the crop yields to Mao and lied to him. When Mao personally visited the fields, the local governments had men secretly transplant stalks from dying fields to healthy fields whenever Mao walked by, giving the illusion of a bumper harvest, so Mao thought there was sufficient grain to export to pay back the Soviet Union for machinery imports. So is it really Mao's fault when he was lied to by the provincial governments? You said: "Attempts were made to enhance rural education and the status of women (allowing them to initiate divorce if they desired) and ending foot-binding, child marriage and opium addiction." Well, isn't that good? During the Cultural Revolution, the peasants in the rural countryside could finally get an education thanks to Mao Zedong, and women too were granted the rights to education, divorce rights as well as getting rid of horrible traditions like foot-binding. As Mao said: "Women hold up half the sky" (妇女能顶半边天) Mao Zedong is the reason why China today is a strong and reunified country today as the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, instead of the weak and divided country that was the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949). Yet Mao is poorly understood in the West today, they deliberately frame his policies as evil as part of the Red Scare (fear of communism) mentality.
    1
  16734.  @missf4681  Are you talking about how AIDS came from the United States? Yes, we are still dealing with the last one.
    1
  16735.  @bartonlee3594  Which of my posts did I double-posted?
    1
  16736.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou Perhaps you didn't grasp my phrase. There is not contraction there." Who said anything about contraction? I pointed out how you contradicted yourself when you said it's about quality rather than quantity, and you used Japan as an example claiming that it's huge.
    1
  16737.  @missf4681  the World Health Organization sent an investigation team into Wuhan and visited the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and their report basically rules out the lab leak theory as highly unlikely.
    1
  16738.  @missf4681  WHO sent an investigation team into Wuhan, visited the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and their report basically rules out the possibility of a leak as highly unlikely.
    1
  16739.  @missf4681  ​The findings by the WHO investigation team that visited Wuhan, indicate that the possibility of it was highly unlikely. Go read the report.
    1
  16740.  @bartonlee3594  You said contraction, but I'm pointing out your own contradiction here (which I will not repeat again).
    1
  16741.  @bartonlee3594  Hey, why did you edit your post to make it such that you claimed you double posted?
    1
  16742.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou You edited YOUR post." Where did I do that? None of my posts have the (edited) tag attached to them, so why are you accusing me of editing my post? It's your post that has the (edited) tag attached to it.
    1
  16743.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "I was pointing out BOTH the good and the bad of fintech policy." Actually you didn't. You just claim the Ant Financial issue was a debacle (without bothering to explain) whereas I have pointed out how Ant's IPO would have made a few people richer by at least a billion, and possibly further widen the income gap in China. Apart from that, it's like you copied chunks of text off Wikipedia (without bothering to remove the square brackets "[ ]") and just post it in your comment.
    1
  16744. China is neutral to both Ukraine and Russia and is sending humanitarian aid to Ukraine as well as continuing to trade with Russia. There are few other candidates that could offer to act as a mediator between Ukraine and Russia.
    1
  16745. China took 4 decades to become a manufacturing hub. Trump wants to industrialize USA in just 4 years!
    1
  16746. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16747. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  16748.  @vikasthakur2139  "神州 Shenzhou Why british had taken permission from china." Because British had recognized China's suzerainty over Tibet in the 1907 Convention Between Great Britain and Russia. Here's what the convention stated: _ The Governments of Great Britain and Russia recognizing the suzerain rights of China in Thibet_ Article II. In conformity with the admitted principle of the suzerainty of China over Thibet, Great Britain and Russia engage not to enter into negotiations with Thibet except through the intermediary of the Chinese Government. But Britain drew up the MacMahon Line without consulting an intermediary of the Chinese government.
    1
  16749.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Please tell us, if the countries remained one, what would the upheaval and violence become." What we do know is that there was much unnecessary bloodshed as a result of the British partition between India and Pakistan. Even you admitted this earlier when you said: "神州 Shenzhou Between 500000 and 2 million people died as a result of the partition Between India and Pakistan." so wouldn't it have been better if British India had not been partitioned?
    1
  16750.  @ArmenFirmen  People in Xinjiang have travelled to the actual ground coordinates that correspond to satellite images of detention camp, and found the locations to be schools, residences, dormitories and so on. Also, China has built at least 35,000 mosques, more than France's 2,300, America's 2,106 and Britain's 1,600.
    1
  16751. ​ @jaishankar1917  "神州 Shenzhou Yeah you are right. Pakistan and India have a shared history. So whats the problem?" The problem is that the "colonial mentality" is driving a wedge between these two brother states, and has led to unnecessary bloodshed and resulted in the current division of South Asia. Compared to East Asia, mainland China fights hard to hold on to our territories of Xinjiang, Tibet, Hong Kong, Taiwan, so that we don't end up like India and Pakistan; Brother states fighting among themselves, while the British are smiling.
    1
  16752.  @hodam9687  Pakistan and India clearly share the same history. Look up Pakistan's history and India's history and there's mention of the Indus Valley Civilization, the Vedric Era, and British India. Also, the same blood runs between Pakistani and Indian. For example, are there not Muslims living in India? Likewise, are there not Hindus living in Pakistan? Using religion as a means to distinguish Pakistani and India is one of the methods the British colonists use to create divisions among the once unified country.
    1
  16753.  @hodam9687  Chinese, Japanese and Koreans do share the same blood. Genetic studies have revealed an ancestor of Han Chinese, Japanese and Koreans dating to 3000 – 3600 years ago during the Shang Dynasty. Also, genetics have shown Pakistani and Indians to have many similarities, so why is it you're trying to claim that you don't share the same blood? The genetic data proves it. Much like Ukrainians and Russians share the same Slavic ancestry. But of course, Chinese, Japanese and Koreans are different in other forms, much like Pakistani and Indians are different, despite sharing the same blood.
    1
  16754.  @bartonlee3594  Because Cyrus Janssen is an American citizen, not a Chinese citizen. China is not his country after all, and there's nothing he can do to change China's shortcomings. Whereas as a U.S citizen, he can criticize his own government and change it for the better, so he puts out these videos.
    1
  16755. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  16756.  @MarkYeung1  "If the Taiwanese people hold a referendum and vote for independence, " If the referendum were held right now, then it's most likely that only a minority support independence. Most of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo right now, and the status quo (according to ROC's constitution), is that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  16757.  @MarkYeung1  "Shenzhou. That means China contributed way more to Russia than it contributed to Ukraine." China is also trading with Ukraine. During the last 26 years the exports of China to Ukraine have increased at an annualized rate of 21%, from $73.4M in 1995 to $10.4B in 2021. But you cannot expect exactly equal trade between China and either Ukraine and Russia.
    1
  16758. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16759. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  16760. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16761.  Jon Doe  U.S. President Donald Trump says China pays the tariffs he has imposed on $250 billion of Chinese exports to the United States. But that is not how tariffs work. China’s government and companies in China do not pay tariffs directly. Tariffs are a tax on imports. They are paid by U.S.-registered firms to U.S. customs for the goods they import into the United States. Importers often pass the costs of tariffs on to customers - manufacturers and consumers in the United States - by raising their prices. U.S. business executives and economists say U.S. consumers foot much of the bill through rising prices. Who pays Trump's tariffs, China or U.S. customers and companies? Source: reuters(dot)com/article/us-usa-trade-china-tariffs-explainer-idUSKCN1SR1UI
    1
  16762.  @yapandasoftware  Hong Kong was literally stolen from China by the British. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China wasn't interested in what the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and force Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want, because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain finally renounced its ownership over its former colonies, Hong Kong wasn't even fully returned back to China. China had to sign a 50-year declaration with Britain, just for them to handover what originally belongs to China.
    1
  16763.  @yapandasoftware  said "神州 Shenzhou I don't care. Qù tā mā de" Now you're just sounding childish and resorting to vulgarity. Hong Kong was a thriving port city precisely because it was under authoritarian British colonial rule for over 100 years, during which Hong Kong never enjoyed democracy, and virtually no elections were even held by the people of Hong Kong, while they were a British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover to mainland China, did the people of Hong Kong finally get to vote in elections regularly for the first time, So isn't it thanks to China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy, when they enjoyed no democracy under authoritarian British colonial
    1
  16764.  @yapandasoftware  You talk about Hong Kong independence, but how to achieve such a feat, when Hong Kong is dependent on the mainland for food, water and even electricity? About 70% of HK's water demand is met by importing water from the Dongjiang River in neighbouring Guangdong province. Hong Kong electrical grid is interconnected with the China Southern Power Grid of Mainland China and Hong Kong imports 23% of its total electricity needs from the mainland. Sources: Wikipedia: Water supply and sanitation in Hong Kong Wikipedia: Electricity sector in Hong Kong Thus, it is unlikely Hong Kong will gain independence due to reliance on the mainland for its basic utilities.
    1
  16765.  @yapandasoftware  What about defense then? Hong Kong will need its own army if they want independence. Who's going to form the HKmilitary force? The HK youth today are so pampered that you think they are willing to get conscripted into the HK military? They're more likely to protest military conscription. Hong Kong will also need to establish its own defense budget, which means money must be allocated towards building up its army and frankly speaking, Hong Kong economy is in a slump today, so can they even afford the additional expenses needed to field its own military? Source: Wikipedia: Military of Hong Kong Hong Kong currently enjoys the protection of the People's Liberation Army (world's largest land army) and Hong Kong does not need a defence budget, neither does it needs forced military conscription, since it is under the mainland army protection. So what makes you think Hong Kong can just suddenly declare independence then?
    1
  16766.  @yapandasoftware  I am doingresearch and presenting you with questions to ponder regarding Hong Kong's independence. I don't resort to childishly hurling insults and profanities against you just because your views differ from mine. You think declaring independence is such an easy thing, that you can just snap your fingers like Thanos and it will happen?
    1
  16767.  j a  Can you prove that the 6.4% figure isn't real then? And while $5 saved each time seems little, Americans have been saving billions of $5 dollars over the decades already thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Also, in your example, American companies find cheaper alternatives, but there are currently no other countries with the business infrastructure to manufacture goods with good price over quality, as China. Additionally, if the trade war keeps up, China could possibly retaliate with tariffs of our own too. For example, China makes up 70-80% of the world's rare earth materials production, which are a vital component across various technologies like microchips, LCD and plasma screens, fiber optics, lasers, batteries, solar panels, high-performance magnets, alloys, petroleum refining, diesel additives, and so on. China could possibly retaliate against U.S tariffs by restricting its rare earth materials supply.
    1
  16768.  j a  1) So you can't prove the 6.4% figure wrong? Then what is China's economic growth rate you tell me? 2) United States will be fighting for the 20-30% of the rare earth materials and there would be insufficient amounts of rare earths to meet the demand that USA is used to. 3) American companies and farmers are suffering under Trump's tariffs today, because they bear the brunt of the tariffs, and it will trickle down to affect the consumers (Americans themselves) 4) How many of your products are actually Made in Vietnam, Malaysia, India, Korea, etc, as opposed to Made in China? Do those countries have enough ports to ship the goods all the way across the Pacific Ocean to US's shores?
    1
  16769.  @yapandasoftware  said "Nobody is ever going to invade Hong Kong because they want Hong Kong's business." Hong Kong was colonized by the British and was later invade by Imperial Japan and occupied. So what makes you think Hong Kong won't ever get invaded? If anything, an independent Hong Kong would view mainland China itself as a threat and would want defenses of its own isn't it? You see, I present logic and facts, whereas you're just dismissing my claims and hurling insults against me that's all.
    1
  16770.  Duke Of Prunes  China's economy has already surpassed the U.S. economy in terms of GDP by PPP. It all depends on the method of calculation you use to determine who's economy is the biggest.
    1
  16771.  j a  Vietnam, Malaysia, and India are all located across the Pacific Ocean from America, so these countries will need infrastructure like ports capable of transporting huge volume of goods to America. China is home to many of the world's busiest ports, like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan, Qingdao, Tianjin, Dalian, Xiamen, and even Hong Kong, because a lot of Chinese goods get shipped out to America and elsewhere. Source: Wikipedia: List of busiest container ports Wikipedia: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage How can Vietnam, Malaysia, and India even hope to replace China as America's chief exporter of goods? They lack the extensive business infrastructure that China has developed over the years.
    1
  16772. Many Singaporeans (not all) still suffer from the "colonial mentality" which is imposed by the colonizer on the minds of the colonized. Even if there is physical decolonization, a "decolonization of the mind" needs to happen in order to undo this mental enslavement.
    1
  16773. US will do anything to keep its military outpost (disguised as a country) located right in the heart of the Arab world.
    1
  16774. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16775. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  16776. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16777. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16778. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  16779. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  16780. 轮子只靠黑中国吃饭。
    1
  16781. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  16782. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16783. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  16784. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16785.  @BlockedTruth 1979 Taiwan Relations Act was not signed by the CPC. It's funny how China is only granted permission to enter the WTO by signing this agreement, when China had aimed to be founding member of WTO in 1995, but this entry was thwarted by the U.S. That's why China had a late entry into WTO in 2001 instead. Also, if you go the US State Department Website on U.S relations with Taiwan, it says that US does not have diplomatic relations with Taiwan and that they do not support Taiwan's independence.
    1
  16786. The U.S is funding color revolutions in Myanmar, Thailand and Kazakhstan in South East Asia and Central Asia. This is part of the U.S strategy to surround Russia and China, attempting to destabilize neighboring countries in order to contain China's rise.
    1
  16787. Chinese economic relations with N. Korea are bilateral issue, and different from the agreed UN sanctions. Remember that N. Korea is nuclear-capable state, and the government doesn't want push the country over the edge and create conflict in growing East Asia. Our economies are at stake here in East Asia if war breaks out here. US deploys forces to those regions, but because of that, S. Korea and Japan do not have to spend as much on their military, as compared to USA. Its the same situation as in US military support in NATO. Those countries spend less on their military due to presence of US military assets to defend them. Why not USA withdraw forces from S. Korea and Japan (doesn't have to be 100%, maybe 50% or even 20%) and then use this excuse to coax N. Korea into abandoning its nuclear program. S. Korea and Japan will be alarmed and increase their defense budget, and USA benefits from reduced military expenditure (similar to reduce expenditure in NATO). Afterall, sanctions clearly do not seem to work on N. Korea. Lastly if Guam is truly US territory, then why are the people of Guam not allowed to vote during US elections? Guam is not one of the 50 states of USA, possibly because US government afraid the people of Guam would vote for independence if given the chance to do so.
    1
  16788. +Crazy Asian Who are you calling naive? How do you know it won't work at all? Trump is planning withdraw US troops and military assets from NATO, so why are US military bases in South Korea and Okinawa Japan any different? Will US lose credibility if it withdrew forces from NATO? No, so why is it different from East Asia? South Korea and Japan both signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty, so who says they will develop nuclear weapons because US withdraw troops? Why would Americans see the withdrawal as cowardly, if USA can use the withdraw to prompt North Korea into signing an agreement? For example, USA can withdraw 20% of its forces, then agree to withdraw the rest, only if North Korea agrees to complete denuclearization. If it doesn't agree, USA would at least save 20% of its East Asian military expenses, and it will coax South Korea and Japan into spending more money on their army. What USA controlling wars? USA is involved in wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and other Middle East countries even in 2000s. East Asia doesn't have any war at the moment, so why USA interfering with East Asia? Does USA want to turn peaceful East Asia into conflicted Middle East, and hurt our growing economies here? So why are the "happy" people in Guam not allowed to vote during American elections? How do you know if they are happy or not?
    1
  16789. +Crazy Asian Why do you keep mocking me being naive? Trump may not truly withdraw from NATO, but he is negotiate better terms for USA in NATO. NATO represents military interest of several countries, so how is it completely different from US military bases in South Korea and Japan? USA is not obliged to defend NATO countries if American citizens are unhappy about US military expenditure in NATO. That's one of reason Trump supporters voted for him in the first place right? Where is the lost of face from reducing US military expenditure in NATO? What proof do you have of Japan and S. Korea developing nuclear weapons once US troops withdraw? Both of them are NPT signatories, so where are they going to acquire nuclear weapon technology supplies from? Who will supply them with nuclear weapons? North Korean missiles can't even reach US mainland, so where is the inherent threat to US way of living? The closest that US mainland has ever come to being in great danger, was during Cuban Missile crisis, so what is the threat level faced by USA today? You think N. Korea won't be wiped off the map, once it attack USA? USA still suffers from occasional terrorists attack within its own soil. By sending its troops to Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, it is only destroying the lives of Middle Eastern countries, and therefore, the ranks of the terrorists swell with more and more poor people unhappy with USA. Even when one terrorist cell brought down, another rises in its place. Look at Taliban once being trained by CIA, which then rebel against USA. Even ISIS is said to be product of US constant intervention in Middle East. Guam has been on a quest for self-governance since 1980s. However, the federal government rejected the version of a commonwealth that the government of Guam proposed. Even the United Nations is in favor of greater self-determination for Guam and other such territories. Can't you see that USA is purposely keeping Guam as part of its territory, without making it a proper state of America and even giving it the right to vote to voice its opinions? I use "our" to refer to East Asia, not America. If war breaks out in East Asia, it will be millions of Chinese, Japanese and especially Koreans dying, while Americans will still be relatively safe in US mainland. USA is the one sending its warships and military assets halfway across the globe unnecessarily to possibly declare war in Asia. China will not let USA turn peaceful Asia into battleground like the conflicted Middle East and destroy our decades of progress achieved here.
    1
  16790. +Crazy Asian Why do you constantly insult me? How is having military bases in South Korea and Japan contribute to "national security"? US soldiers in Okinawa bases sometimes rape the local Okinawans, but the Japanese government can't do anything about it. And there is alot of prostitution going on in US miltary bases in S. Korea, which the S. Koreans do not appreciate. What has this got to do with security of US mainland at all? If Guam is truly US territory, then why aren't Guam citizens allowed to vote for US president, like rest of American states? Its not even considered a commonwealth, like Puerto Rico, so what exactly is Guam, if not a territory held captive by US federal government? Those babies born in Guam may have US passport, but they still lack the ability to participate in US politics through voting. What has me being Chinese got to do with my political views about Guam? Do you discriminate people's political views by their race and their people? Chinese government has made multiple repeated requests for Indian troops to withdraw from our territory. The government has also given India a deadline to act, otherwise, there will be possibly military consequences, such as deployment of more PLA troops, attack helicopters and Multi-Rocket Launcher vehicles to the area. You think our government is like Trump, just deciding to bombard Syria airbase with 59 Tomahawk missiles, just like that? Some Chinese politicians are moving their families out of China, because of pollution issues, or because of corruption crackdown tracing the source of their wealth. It is not simple affair, but regardless, they are still CPC members and are still expected to participate in China's politics.
    1
  16791.  @Dr_stone666  A Chinese vaccine has been approved for human testing in Wuhan. Source: Chinese Vaccine Approved for Human Testing bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-18/chinese-vaccine-approved-for-human-testing-at-virus-epicenter
    1
  16792. This begs the question: Why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all their advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the Communists' right to rule China.
    1
  16793. Under Belt and Road Initiative, the government is not going to stop at Europe alone, and is actually planning to connect virtually the entire world using railway, even Africa, and the Americas, with World Land Bridge. schillerinstitute.org/strategic/2016/0825-sandmark-yemen/world_land-bridge-map.jpg But of course it will possibly take many decades and centuries before this dream can be fully realized.
    1
  16794. If the ships are out of range of China's land missiles during a sea blockade, then China also has Anti-ship Cruise Missiles launched from submarines according to the following article. China Unveils New Submarine-Launched Anti-Ship Cruise Missile thediplomat.com/2016/04/china-unveils-new-submarine-launched-anti-ship-cruise-missile/
    1
  16795. +Leonard Since when did China even came close to implementing a sea blockade at all? Right now merchant vessels can pass through Chinese seas without any hindrance. As far as I know, the only country that ever successfully implemented a naval blockade is USA during the Cuban missile crisis, so who's to say that USA won't do the same to China here?
    1
  16796. Mickey G If you really live in Africa, then you should know that Africa is rich in resources and probably one of worlds richest reserves of natural resources. But all that natural wealth still remains unaccessible to majority of Africans if they are unable to tap into those resources themselves. African countries could one day be extremely powerful if they could harness their own resources effectively instead of relying on foreign nations to extract them. China is still growing and is hungry for resources that African nations have, but it should be noted that Chinese conduct business transactions with African nations to acquire those resources, which is fundamentally different from Western colonialism. China also help build much infrastructure in Africa, such as roads, railways, schools, hospitals, hotels, shopping centres, football stadiums and telecommunications facilities. These are fundamental to the development of any nation and China has done much to develop Africa in decades, compared to what Westerners did in Africa for centuries.
    1
  16797. Agreed. But sadly the reverse isn't true, and USA hasn't bothered to learn anything from China. Many Westerners (but not all) seem to consider it beneath themselves to learn from a non-Western country.
    1
  16798. In US pop culture, catchphrases like "F**K THE POLICE" are extremely popular, and only promote lack of respect for authority and make policemen lives more difficult.
    1
  16799.  Karen Xitler  Japan is the only country to become the target of nuclear attacks, are you sure the Japanese want hypersonic nukes?
    1
  16800.  @efeocampo  Most of Brian's sources stem from Western MSM as well, so he's literally using Western articles/websites to debunk Western propaganda. Yet people still accuse him of being a shill, when he's just simply reading out what's available on Western websites.
    1
  16801.  @MHiggins  China has world's largest population, so there is a possibility that there are not enough resources, not enough schools and not enough jobs for everyone in China. With such huge student population, competition for top schools and higher education is extremely fierce and intense here in China. Some students unable to qualify for local university, so they may choose to study abroad (especially if their parents have $$$) Some Chinese graduates may also be unable to find jobs here so they may seek employment opportunities outside of China. That's why your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, competing with them in exams, for university spots and even job offers when they graduate. If Chinese overseas graduates can't find jobs in your country, they are always welcome to come home to China (thus saving China the resources needed to train this student to university degree locally) and bringing foreign knowledge and technology to our shores. If they find a job in your country, then they deprive a local graduate of a job, and if they rise to high position in corporation or your government, then they might get approached by CCP and potentially recruited as a spy in your country. Whichever way you look at it, China wins.
    1
  16802.  @MHiggins  Hong Kong was literally stolen from China by the British. During 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period in Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout the rest of China. Even after Britain renounced ownership over it's former colonies, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China and China had to sign a 50-years declaration with Britain, just for Britain to handover what was originally China's.
    1
  16803.  @MHiggins  Democracy? Hong Kong had been ruled by authoritian British colonial rule for over 100 years! During this period, Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong while they were a British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover to mainland China, did the people of Hong Kong finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders, so isn't it thanks to China that Hong Kong can enjoy democracy under the One-Country Two-Systems policy?
    1
  16804. Biden told Xi during a video call that: "The U.S does not support Taiwan independence. I take there remarks seriously" Also.. Biden Administration: "Let's remove the line that U.S does not support Taiwan independence from our website" China: "Why the mixed signals?"
    1
  16805. China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020, China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time, and by 12th Jan, China had sequenced the Covid-19 genome and shared the information with the WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them
    1
  16806.  @FireFox-ch2tu  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16807. ​ @FireFox-ch2tu If you disagree with my post, why not point out where I am wrong? No one else on this thread seems to have done so, in fact it seems that lots of people agree given the amount of likes my post here has received.
    1
  16808. ​ @FireFox-ch2tu More Chinese leaving China than Indians leaving India could be because Chinese are now rich enough to travel, whereas many Indians remain impoverished and unable to leave their country even if they want to, how does that make "my argument fall flat?"
    1
  16809. @FireFox-ch2tu Since Trump came to power, China has been experiencing a "reverse brain drain." It used to be that Chinese intellectuals migrated from China to the USA (meaning China experienced brain drain). However, thanks to Trump's MAGA policies, many overseas Chinese intellectuals are no longer feeling safe, and some have opted to return to China, bringing their skills and knowledge to the homeland, reversing the trend of brain-drain.
    1
  16810. @FireFox-ch2tu Since Trump came to power, China has been experiencing a "reverse brain drain." It used to be that China experienced brain drain back when China was poor and intellectuals migrated out of China. Now Trump's MAGA policies are making overseas Chinese return back to China, bringing their skills and knowledge with them.
    1
  16811. @FireFox-ch2tu China has been experiencing a reverse brain drain since Trump came to power. Chinese intellectuals used to migrate out of China back when China was poor, however, Trump's MAGA policies have reversed this trend as many overseas Chinese intellectuals have opted to return to the homeland, bringing along their skills and knowledge.
    1
  16812. ​ @FireFox-ch2tu You said: "your argument that indians go to west because of western gloating falls flat when you see chinese that talk about china being so great leaving it and going to the "enemy" to live" Since when was that my argument? Could you quote me my words where I said that Indians go to west because of western gloating? Also, just because you claim Chinese talk about China being so great leaving it and going to the "enemy" to live, doesn't change my argument that many Indians have the colonial mentality, so please explain exactly how does my argument fall flat? We're talking about Indians, then why are you bringing up Chinese and claiming my argument falls flat?
    1
  16813.  @joesmith9139  You said: "you can research similar topics on the net if interested: how are Europeans keeping it green. I am a European living in Asia atm, and the difference in mentality is simply mindblowing." China built the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy. This makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity. Countries by Hydroelectricity Generation (in TWh) in 2023 1. China (1,225.995) 2. Brazil (428.653) 3. Canada (364.196) 4. United States (236.321) 5. Russian Federation (200.866) ... Yet earlier you said Europe works on addressing climate change "much more than China."? How so?
    1
  16814.  @joesmith9139  Let's get this straight. The West that have been emitting greenhouse gases since 200-300 years ago when the Industrial Revolution began in 1700-1800 AD. Whereas China's industrialization only began some 40 years ago in comparison, so how fair is your comparison? In fact, if you look at cumulative CO2 emissions, it's actually the United States that is the largest producer of CO2, not China. Another point to note is that China is the world's factory. Everything is Made-in-China these days, even the stuff that Europeans buy. If the manufacturing were done in Europe then it's CO2 emissions would be higher in Europe, but since the manufacturing is done in China, then the CO2 emissions comes from China instead of Europe. Because Europe outsourced its manufacturing, thus its CO2 emissions as well.
    1
  16815.  @joesmith9139  Not only did China build the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, but China is also the world's largest producer of solar panels and also solar power. The Xinjiang solar farm in China has just become the world’s largest solar farm, with an installed solar capacity of 5GW. The power plant is able to produce so much power that it could, in theory, power the entirety of Luxembourg or Papua New Guinea for an entire year. The world's 2nd largest solar farm is also in China, the Golmud Solar Park, with an installed solar capacity of 2.8 GW. In context, a single gigawatt could power one million UK homes for an hour, or around 100 million LED light bulbs. Countries by solar power generation 1. China (584.150 TWh) 2. United States (238.120 TWh) 3. India (113.410 TWh) 4. Japan (109.360 TWh) 5. Germany (61.560 TWh) ... Yet you're claiming Europe works on addressing climate change "much more than China."?
    1
  16816.  @joesmith9139  Because Europe shifted their manufacturing to China, and their greenhouse gas emissions becomes China's instead. How's this a fair comparison?
    1
  16817.  @joesmith9139  Because Europe's factories have relocated to China. So their carbon emissions become China's.
    1
  16818.  @joesmith9139  Because Europe's carbon emitting factories have left Europe and come to China.
    1
  16819.  @joesmith9139  "The EU is able to have lower emmissions while maintaining a higher quality of life." Because they move their factories to China, and then blame China for carbon emitted.
    1
  16820.  @joesmith9139  "The EU is able to have lower emmissions while maintaining a higher quality of life." Because the EU moved their factories to the developing world (including China), and then point fingers at the developing world for contributing to climate change.
    1
  16821.  @joesmith9139  Because the EU moved their manufacturing plants to China, and then blame China for contributing to climate change.
    1
  16822. @ "The EU is able to have lower emmissions while maintaining a higher quality of life." Because the EU moved their factories to the developing world (including China), and then point fingers at the developing world for contributing to climate change.
    1
  16823.  @topsuperseven7910  You said: "The next thing will be removing the CPC regime in China. They will be successful at that too." Why do you want the CPC to be removed from power? The CPC's removal would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China?
    1
  16824. Yes, this is the source: American billionaires got $434 billion richer during the pandemic cnbc.com/2020/05/21/american-billionaires-got-434-billion-richer-during-the-pandemic.html
    1
  16825.  @logomoko78  The Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (national language of China) Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth and they learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America.
    1
  16826. Americans often lament that the 1% control the 99%.
    1
  16827.  @blafonovision4342  It's actually American "diplomats" (if they can even be called such) such as Jake Sullivan, John Kirby and Anthony Blinken, that are doing Wolf Warrior Diplomacy. Chinese diplomats like Wang Yi are making peace deals instead.
    1
  16828. USA: "China builds infrastructure so that they can take over it!" Also, USA: "Panama Canal was built by America, it belongs to us!"
    1
  16829.  @EzraFieldsofStrawberry  Where do you get this figure of 1 million Uighurs? Turns out this figure came from 2 dubious sources, one of which only interviewed 8 Uighurs on what their estimated number of Uighurs in re-education schools were, and then they extrapolated the figure to arrive at the figure of 1 million Uighurs in detention. Source: China detaining millions of Uyghurs? Serious problems with claims by US-backed NGO and far-right researcher ‘led by God’ against Beijing thegrayzone.com/2019/12/21/china-detaining-millions-uyghurs-problems-claims-us-ngo-researcher/ While CHRD states that it interviewed dozens of ethnic Uyghurs in the course of its study, their enormous estimate was ultimately based on interviews with exactly eight Uyghur individuals.
    1
  16830.  @EzraFieldsofStrawberry  You linked me a source, claiming the Communist Party of China "pursued policies leading to more than one million Muslims (the majority of them Uyghurs) being held in secretive internment camps without any legal process." Did you read the source you linked me?
    1
  16831.  @EzraFieldsofStrawberry  "This link describes the logistics of mass internment, even including a leaked government document (I am sure you would refute its legitimacy and/or its translation)" The logistics of mass internment of 1 million people are staggering. 1 million people is about the population of Manhatten Island, how do you expect the government to house such a huge population of detainees in Xinjiang, without any trace? About the translation of the document, people on Reddit have already pointed out the numerous grammatical mistakes (Source:reddit.com/r/Sino/comments/ec2dui/great_example_of_all_the_grammar_mistakes_noted/ ) in the document. It appears as if the documents was first written in English before being Google translated poorly into Chinese, making it seem like it was fabricated evidence to attack China.
    1
  16832.  @EzraFieldsofStrawberry  "Preface: They say there is no ethnic/religious component to what is happening and say it is about combating "terrorism." That excuse sounds the same as the excuses the United States gave for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. I can't buy that excuse, especially with the mountain of evidence that proves otherwise." Why do you think it isn't combating terrorism? Previously, Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region used to be plagued by terrorist attacks perpetrated by misguided Ughurs such as the 1992 Ürümqi bombings, the 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings, the 2010 Aksu bombing, the 2011 Hotan attack, 2011 Kashgar attacks, and the 2014 Ürümqi attack Source: 1992 Ürümqi bombings wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_bombings Source: 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings wikipedia.org/wiki/1997_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_bus_bombings Source: 2010 Aksu bombing wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Aksu_bombing Source: 2011 Hotan attack wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Hotan_attack Source: 2011 Kashgar attacks wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Kashgar_attacks Source: April 2014 Ürümqi attack wikipedia.org/wiki/April_2014_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_attack But thanks to the government program in Xinjiang, there have been no more terrorist attacks in Xinjiang since. This implies that the government is really "combating terrorism" and it works because there's no more terrorist attacks in Xinjiang since. So why do you believe that it's not combating terrorism? Because USA gave the same excuses for Afghanistan and Iraq? Former US President Bush had invaded Iraq on suspicion of harbouring Weapons of Mass Destruction, but after invading Iraq, no evidence of WMDs were found. Turns out that the vial of suspicious powder they were waving about, was common detergent powder, not evidence of WMDs. Given US history of fabricating evidence to justify wars in the Middle East, isn't it possible that USA is doing the same thing to China by fabricating evidence in order to stir up anti-China sentiment among Americans?
    1
  16833.  @EzraFieldsofStrawberry  "1. Increased population doesn't disprove genocide, genocide is more than killing of people, it is eradication and assimilation of a culture. Naturally population increases over time so that isn't surprising that it would increase." About eradication and assimilation of culture, if you go to Xinjiang and look around, the Uighur language is still very much in use throughout the region. Street signs, shop signs, even restaurant menus have Uighur language written on them in Xinjiang. Uighur culture is celebrated across Xinjiang through festivals, dances traditional clothing, Uighurs musical instruments, even Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV prominent feature Uighur culture in the spotlight. Even the Chinese Renminbi bill contains Uighur language, as one of the minority languages, this shows China's commitment to preserving ethic minority languages and traditions. If there was really a cultural genocide going on in Xinjiang, why would Chinese media prominent feature Uighur culture in the spotlight? …… You said: "Increase in GDP could indicate that wealthier people are moving to the region rather than minority populations becoming better off." That's a possibility, yes. But let me then ask you this, what do these wealthier people do with their money after moving to Xinjiang? They spend their money in Xinjiang, sampling Uighur cuisine, invest in businesses, hire local Uighurs, buying local produce, and so on. Money is flowing into Xinjiang from rest of China regardless. …… You said: "The regions with the biggest growth and wealth increase, have Uygher vastly in the minority (Ürümqi is ~13% Uygher)." For a long time, China's development strategy is to let a few places become rich first, before gradually spreading the wealth towards the more impoverished regions. It's easier to a few people out of poverty first before distributing the wealth, rather than trying to lift everyone out of poverty at once. China did this by allowing the port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, to develop first, before developing the more landlocked regions like Xinjiang and Tibet. Same thing that China is letting Urumqi develop first before gradually spreading the wealth into the more remote regions of Xinjiang.
    1
  16834.  @EzraFieldsofStrawberry  "神州 Shenzhou There are many photos showing these facilities and the people being detained." Yeah, satellite imagery from space which doesn't show the actual ground conditions. ASPI (Australian Strategic Policy Institute) has uploaded the coordinates of suspected detention sites, but film crews visited those actual locations and found that they were schools, residences and in some cases, 5-star apartments. (youtu.be/v_XI-aiCa34?t=335 ) …… You said: "Your statement is akin to questioning the Holocaust (many Holocaust survivor groups have condemned China's actions)." The problem is, there is no concrete evidence of actual genocide (whether cultural or not) in Xinjiang, unlike there is for the Holocaust, who are these Holocaust survivors to condemn China without even verifying the situation on the group first hand? Just some satellite imagery and people already jump to the conclusion that genocide is happening in Xinjiang? The Holocaust resulted in many Jews refugees fleeing Germany and flooding the neighbouring countries. If there really was the equivalent of a holocaust in Xinjiang, then you should be seeing the surrounding countries bordering Xinjiang swamped by Uighur refugees. Yet this isn't the case, there is no Uighur refugee camp providing asylum to Uighur refugees in the neighbouring countries bordering Xinjiang, so what concrete evidence is there of a Holocaust in Xinjiang?
    1
  16835.  @EzraFieldsofStrawberry  "If it is the United States government that is falsifying the document, you would think that they would fake it using someone who actually speaks Chinese, rather than Google Translate. The United States has all the resources to fake it authentically." I would like to point out that I did not suggest that the United States was behind this supposed fabrication of leaked documents, I merely suggested that the leaked documents contains many grammatical errors, almost as if this document was poorly translated from English to Chinese through Google translate.
    1
  16836.  @EzraFieldsofStrawberry  "神州 Shenzhou You're refutation is from state media and obviously it is biased." If you make such a claim, then I can always claim that Western MSM is also biased when reporting on China, they refuse to show the true situation of Xinjiang, they keep up the genocide narrative (whether cultural or not) because they want to demonise China and paint negative image of our country. …… You said: "I have seen images from inside the camps too." Okay, which image from inside the camp did you see? What are the ground coordinates of that camp?
    1
  16837.  @EzraFieldsofStrawberry  I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  16838. @Allen Janco Then why @NoToRiOuS said: "神州 Shenzhou you're literally everywhere" when he's only following my comment history? Of course he'll find me when he's stalking my comment history.
    1
  16839.  @Blindswordsman1994  Look at the US Captain of infected aircraft carrier who has been dismissed from his position after informing the government about the worsening infection on board the aircraft carrier. Video: U.S. Navy fires captain who sought help for virus-stricken ship youtu.be/Im18TI4uuWQ
    1
  16840.  @Notorious_biggest  But it's stalking when you deliberately follow my comment history and then accuse me of being everywhere. What sort of logic is this?
    1
  16841.  @Notorious_biggest  "神州 Shenzhou when did I say I followed ur comment history fool?" Did I ever accused you of saying that you followed my comment history? Could you quote me my words saying that I said that you said you followed my comment history?
    1
  16842.  @Notorious_biggest  Yes I said you deliberately follow my comment history. But I specifically asked you "Did I ever accused you of saying that you followed my comment history? Could you quote me my words saying that I said that you said you followed my comment history?"
    1
  16843.  @Notorious_biggest  Look all you done is hurl personal insults against me (calling me fool and idiot) for my views, instead of attempting to refute my points so why don't you attack my points instead of attacking me personally for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    1
  16844.  @Notorious_biggest  The government rushed to built a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised. Video: Huoshenshan: the hospital built in 10 days in China over coronavirus outbreak youtu.be/l2QfufpwfdY Kudos to the Chinese construction workers who worked hard to build those hospitals. China also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. Video: Time-lapse video shows how Leishenshan hospital completed in 12 days youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk
    1
  16845.  @Notorious_biggest  Who's the one sidetracked by claiming that I am everywhere? You're just resorting to hurling personal insults against me for my views that's all.
    1
  16846.  @Notorious_biggest  You don't have even contribute anything to the discussion, you just resort to hurling personal insults against me for my views which happen to differ from yours.
    1
  16847.  @Notorious_biggest  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  16848.  @Notorious_biggest  Here's a look inside Chinese BYD mask factory. Video: China: Factory produces 5 million masks a day in bid to supply shortfall youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw?t=17
    1
  16849.  @Notorious_biggest  This factory in the eastern Chinese city of Rizhao (日照) has been busy pumping out 3,000,000 masks a day. Video: Inside China's Biggest Mask Factory youtu.be/Gc074FxOBA4?t=11
    1
  16850.  @Notorious_biggest  Video: China: Shanghai mask factory ramps up production as demand skyrockets due to coronavirus youtu.be/8q3sAcS8kOs
    1
  16851.  @vaquero3578  "神州 Shenzhou because he said something critical about the state..."_ Ren Zhiqiang called President Xi a clown, how's that being critical of the state? At least supplement criticism with either something constructive or point out something that needs improvement, but he just insult people for no apparent reason. And do you have any evidence that he's dead?
    1
  16852.  @liftingweights  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  16853.  @liftingweights  Granted, the Communist Party of China is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  16854.  @liftingweights  It's not just Italy that has earlier cases, even New Jersey mayor has tested positive for Covid-19 and claims he had Covid-19 back in November 2019, before the outbreak in Wuhan. The mayor of Belleville, New Jersey, Michael Melham said he tested positive for coronavirus antibodies, adding that he contracted the novel coronavirus in November, over two months before the first confirmed case was reported in the U.S. Video: U.S. mayor claims he contracted COVID-19 in November youtu.be/Ht9hlc5MbEM
    1
  16855.  @liftingweights  Why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage; they were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were lousy, and they had far fewer numbers (only 50 communist members in 1921) over the Kuomintang. The KMT on the other hand, had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training, and far superior numbers over the the communists. Securing victory against the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT. Yet the communists survived all KMT attempts to wipe them out, employing strategies like "Long March" (长征) and despite KMT's initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan). This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland.
    1
  16856. Australia thinks of itself as one of the Big Western Powers, like the US or EU. However, Australia doesn't have the economy (nor military) as the US/EU, and yet they want to take on China?
    1
  16857. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16858. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16859. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  16860. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16861. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16862. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16863. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16864. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16865. According to its constitution, Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16866. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16867. According to its constitution, Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16868. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms and would probably have done a 5th, yet Chinese President Xi Jinping is only entering his 3rd term.
    1
  16869. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms whereas Chinese President Xi Jinping is only entering his 3rd term.
    1
  16870. I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for the best experience.)
    1
  16871. Move Forward should name change to Move Aside.
    1
  16872. Agreed. Nobody force that man to leave China for USA but himself, leaving behind his wife and kids. Then he blames Chinese government for his family breakup? Why didn't he bring his wife and kids along, and bring them up in America? The Chinese agent (who was Uighur) even persuade him to come back, but he refused so his choice is made.
    1
  16873. +YoutubeUser +Dumbledores Army Nothing wrong with leaving your family temporary to study overseas. But after your studies are done, why you abandon your wife and daughter back at home? Why not take them with you, or come back to them? That's why his daughter call him "bad person" and his wife divorced him after he moved to the USA. Because Tahir himself choose to cut his ties to his family.
    1
  16874. +Dumbledores Army Look at USA, and Americans constantly mock their own President Trump, mock his policies, his hairstyle, target his wife and kids for lewd jokes (especially poor Ivanka Trump) then how is that respecting the leaders of your country?
    1
  16875.  @FireRupee  Why did he abandoned his wife and kids in the first place? And he blame Chinese government when he choose to leave China? And that guy on the other line welcome him to come back to China, so if he refused, then it's his choice not to return.
    1
  16876.  @FireRupee  Have you actually been to Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region and see what life is like there for yourself? Here's an account by Australian-British who cycled across China including Xinjiang. Video: Xinjiang: From the eyes of an Australian British who cycled across China Link＞youtube.com/watch?v=-jlUy2DR8TQ
    1
  16877.  @igrsu  China has laws for mandatory education for our kids, so why can't we take the Uighurs out of being taught the Quran and put them into actual schools? Look at 8:00 and the preschool enrollment for Uighurs jumped by a whopping 148% and the Xinjiang preschool enrollment jumped by 82%, when Uighur enrollment had been abysmally low before This shows Uighur parents aren't sending their kids to school, so why can't China send them to school then? It's our country, our laws.
    1
  16878. @Timing Fire The U.S. has deported more than half a million parents since 2009, according to Washington Post. Source: washingtonpost com/news/wonk/wp/2015/09/21/this-is-what-would-happen-to-the-children-of-11-million-illegal-immigrants-if-president-trump-deported-them/
    1
  16879. @Timing Fire Look at the graph at 8:00 of the video and it shows Uighur preschool enrollment increased by a whopping 148% and that in Xinjiang, preschool enrollment increased by 82%. This meant that Uighurs in Xinjiang had not been sending their kids to school during the preschool age, which is why Uighur preschool enrollment was abysmally low.
    1
  16880.  @Madame702  The problem arises when the United States is following in British footsteps by weaponizing the U.S Dollar as the British did using their currency to control and manipulate countries. Hopefully China doesn't won't follow in this path, we should be better than that.
    1
  16881.  @CyrusJanssen  The question is why is it many countries don't trust China's government to hold the main reserve currency? Whereas now we have concrete examples of the United States freezing over $300 billion of Russia's foreign reserves, not to mention Afghanistan's $7 billion that's also frozen. It makes no sense that countries can still trust the U.S government to hold their reserves.
    1
  16882.  @rpg1663  But you're literally contradicting yourself when you said having the biggest GDP is far from being what dictates the world's reserve currency, yet in the next sentence you said China would need almost 5 times the USA GDP, so you're still counting it by the GDP in the end.
    1
  16883.  @fukushimaisrevelation2817  The world is currently flawed with it's pursuit of a fiat currency, but this was facilitated by capitalism, overproducing goods and seeking profits at the expense of the environment. However, if you study what communism truly is, a communist society is one which is classless, stateless, and effectively cashless. Because in a truly communist society, goods are doled out according to needs, not purchased by people with cash. It's in a capitalist society that allows goods to go to people who have the money to afford it. Take the unequal distribution of Covid-19 vaccines for example. The rich developed countries are buying up and hoarding all the Covid-19 vaccine, leaving little to none for the poorer developing countries. For example, Canada has pre-bought enough Covid-19 vaccines to vaccinate 5-7 times its population. Imagine 1 Canadian having access to 5 vaccines, whereas elsewhere, 10 Africans have to fight for access to 1 vaccine. This is because in a capitalist society the goods go to those who can afford it. Had instead we've been living in a truly communist society, then the scarce vaccines supply would be distributed according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" (German: Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen) Like Tedros of the WHO said, it's better to have some people in all countries vaccinated against the virus, than to have all people in some countries vaccinated.
    1
  16884.  @monicagomez4616  I agree. The U.S Dollar is backed by nothing, and yet the U.S Federal Reserve continues printing like nobody's business. The Dollar is sustained by other people's "belief" in the currency that's all. It's kinda like Wilde Coyote chasing Road Runner off a cliff, only to find that he's running on mid-air and it's only a matter of time before gravity "catches up" to him and reality comes crashing down.
    1
  16885.  @youcantalwaysgetwhatyouwan6687  Take Internet languages for example, and Mandarin Chinese is the 2nd most common language in the Internet just after English. Most Common Internet Languages in 2022 by users 1. English (1,186,451,052) 2. Mandarin Chinese (888,453,608) 3. Spanish (363,684,593 ) 4. Arabic (237,418,349) 5. Indonesian/Malaysian (198,029,815) 6. Portuguese (171,750,818) 7. French (151,733,611) 8. Japanese (118,626,672) 9. Russian (116,353,942) 10. Germany (92,525,427) ... Source: Optimational: What Are the Top 10 Most Popular Languages Used on the Internet by 2022? So why is it inconceivable to you that Mandarin Chinese might someday become a dominant language? China's economy is expected to surpass the United States someday in the foreseeable future, so why not Mandarin Chinese someday too?
    1
  16886. China learned alot from Soviet Union collapsing and losing control of its satellite states. For China to remain united, China needs a strong and centralized government with a capable leader at its helm.
    1
  16887. +Nathaniel Dance The DPP from 2000-2008 were in minority government and the DPP won less than 25% of the seats (38.2% vote share) in the new Legislative Yuan while its presidential candidate, former Kaohsiung mayor Frank Hsieh, lost to KMT candidate Ma Ying-jeou by a wide margin (41.55% vs. 58.45%). And didn't all of Taiwan's great progress and development occurred under single party authoritarian KMT rule? Since Taiwan was progressing under a dictatorship, then why did Taiwan see a need to implement democracy then? Because the West said so? And what has democracy even done for Taiwan, except made its parliament more inefficient? There was even this fight in the Taiwan parliament, like that kennedy Chong mentioned earlier, where parliament members threw chairs and furniture at each other. Video: Massive fight breaks out in Taiwanese parliament youtube.com/watch?v=kXmPDLRt6hA
    1
  16888. America has two-party system and they both blame each other for US's current woes. The Chinese government is only increasing the animosity between Trump supports and anti-Trump people.
    1
  16889.  @tiarnan9793  The poverty figures were published by reputable organization like World Bank so they won't choose to publish those figures if they are inaccurate and risk damage to their reputation. And according to World Bank, China lifted 800 million people out of poverty from 1981 to 2015. Just for comparison, the entire population of African continent is about *1.2 billion*, so China lifted a figure equal to HALF of Africa's entire population out of poverty in just decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. Video: Historical Achievement: Take 700 Million People out of Poverty youtube.com/watch?v=sfNXK791kwA "China has lifted 728 million people out of poverty by international standards. The whole of the rest of the world has only lifted 152 million right?" - John Ross Well-known columnist in UK, Former Deputy Mayor of London
    1
  16890.  @dustyeyer3573  China has pollution problems yes, because of our over reliance on coal power, so Chinese government is making the switch to renewable green energy, and China built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, Three Gorges Dam, to supply China with clean renewable energy to fuel our growth. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtube.com/watch?v=b8cCsUBYSkw This is has resulted in China producing more hydroelectric power than any other country in the world, producing 858 billion kilowatt hours a year. But of course, it will take time to make the switch from fossil fuels to renewable green energy. 1. China (858 billion kilowatt hours) 2. Brazil (411 billion kilowatt hours) 3. Canada (373 billion kilowatt hours) 4. United States (276 billion kilowatt hours) 5. Russia (164 billion kilowatt hours) 6. Norway (140 billion kilowatt hours) Source: China is the world’s largest producer of the hydroelectricity. https://ceoworld.biz/2015/10/14/top-10-countries-that-produce-the-most-hydroelectricity/
    1
  16891.  @tiarnan9793  Besides dominating hydroelectricity, China also dominates in solar power, and the current largest photovoltaic power station in the world is the 850 MW Longyangxia Dam Solar Park, in Qinghai, China. China is also home to world's largest floating solar farm in Huainan City, Anhui, East China. Video: World's largest floating solar farm in E China youtube.com/watch?v=qKpYH5SYUeo
    1
  16892.  @tiarnan9793  Besides dominating solar power, China also dominates wind energy, and the Gansu Wind Farm located in China is world's largest wind farm, with a 7,965 Megawatt capacity. Source: Wikipedia: Wind Energy: Wind Farms wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power#Wind_farms Switching from fossil fuel to renewable energy is no easy feat, but at least China is showing great efforts to make the switch. President Trump on the other hand, promised to bring coal power back to USA and withdrew America from the 2017 Paris Climate Accord and no longer restricting US CO2 emissions.
    1
  16893.  @Klaruza  Chinese in Indonesia were referred to as the "Chinese problem" (Masalah Cina) and Chinese Indonesians have become "the typical scapegoat" in situations where widespread discontent and social unrest becomes violent. Expressions of Chinese culture through language, religion, and traditional festivals were banned and the ethnic Chinese were pressured to adopt Indonesian-sounding names. There were even racial riots in Indonesia, resulting in mass rape of Chinese women (some girls as young as 11 years old) and they were gang raped in front of their families, by as many as 10 men. Indonesian rioters also broke into Chinese stores to loot and burn their property to the ground. Even today, many Chinese in Indonesian have lost their original Chinese names because of Indonesian government policy.
    1
  16894.  @ewchi-m4n012  Taiwan is an inalienable part of China. If you go and read Taiwan's constitution, it says that that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's nor any formal declaration of independence, then Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  16895. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China. If you go and read Taiwan's constitution, it says that that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's nor any formal declaration of independence, then Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  16896. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China. If you go and read Taiwan's constitution, it says that that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's nor any formal declaration of independence, then Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  16897.  @ewchi-m4n012  Mainland China is investing into semiconductors of our own, yet you still claim that Taiwan is doing better than the mainland, but where's your proof? Besides smartphones, Chinese companies also dominate the civilian drone industry and Chinese company DJI is world's largest civilian drone-maker according to the following source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland? Yet you still claim that Taiwan doing better than the mainland?
    1
  16898.  @ewchi-m4n012  Taiwan has soaring house prices, oftentimes beyond the reach of young wage-earners in Taiwan, until even the Taiwan central bank governor suggested that young people consider renting a house until they can afford to purchase one. So what good does an average person in Taiwan being richer than a mainlander, when the cost of living in Taiwan is higher than many mainland cities? Anyone who's been to China knows that the cost of living in here is (generally) cheaper. Food is cheap, so is clothing, rent, train fares, bus fares, carpooling, or you can even rent a bike if you don't like the other modes of transport. And with regards to the so-called "housing bubble", President Xi Jinping's remark is that "Houses are for living in, not for speculation." (房子是用来住的、不是用来炒的。)
    1
  16899.  @ewchi-m4n012  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. This makes China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk But why hasn't Taiwan sent people into space as compared to the mainland? Yet you claim Taiwan is doing better than the mainland?
    1
  16900.  @ewchi-m4n012  Of course the cost of living in Tier 1 cities like Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, is higher than in other lower tiered cities, but the Tier 2 cities (i.e Changsha, Suzhou, Xi'an, Xiamen, Chongqing, Tianjin, Qingdao, Ningbo, Kunming, etc) have a drastically lower cost of living compared to Tier 1, and in some cases, the Tier 2 living standards are almost on par with Tier 1 (except for the noticeable lack of foreigners). Also, I don't know what apartment your Chinese neighbors lived in Shanghai, but just looking off YouTube videos about apartment in Shanghai, there's a wide range of prices and some of them are really good for the price. Again, having more money in Taiwan doesn't necessarily translate to being richer, because the higher cost of living in Taiwan than mainland cities (apart from the Tier 1 cities) means that they spend more on food, clothing, rent, transport, and other daily necessities, compared to in mainland China. Wage stagnation in Taiwan also plays a factor. After the 1997 economic crisis, Taiwan’s minimum wage flatlined for a period lasting a decade from 1997 to 2007. Taiwan used to have a higher minimum wage than South Korea’s, but this changed after 2005, when Taiwan’s wages stagnated to such an extent that it could no longer keep up with South Korea. In fact, Taiwan’s minimum wage was twice as high as South Korea from the late-1980s through to the mid-1990s, but the situation has reversed today where South Korea’s minimum wage is now double that of Taiwan’s. Yet you still claim Taiwan is doing better than the mainland? You said: "And who cares if someone says the houses are for something if most of the market is oriented to investments." I'm sure the young wage-earners in Taiwan would care if the affordability of housing prices are within reach, rather than having housing prices soar due to speculation.
    1
  16901.  @ewchi-m4n012  China has even landed on the Moon. In 2013, China landed our very own lunar spacecraft and lunar rover (Chang'e 3 嫦娥-3 and Yutu 玉兔 "Jade Rabbit") on the Moon, making China the world's 3rd nation to make a soft-landing on Earth's celestial neighbor. In October 2015, the Jade Rabbit set the record for the longest operational period for a rover on the Moon. The rover's ground penetrating radar found evidence of at least 9 distinct rock layers. Video: China moon landing video: 'Jade Rabbit' rover soft-lands on lunar surface Through this, China is showing that Chinese people are capable of achieving equally impressive feats as Westerners in space. Yet you claim Taiwan is doing better than the mainland?
    1
  16902.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou and same to the young chinese when they found they can't afford a house alone." So does this mean that you're contradicting your earlier statement that "And who cares if someone says the houses are for something if most of the market is oriented to investments."? Does this mean that you agree with President Xi's remark that "Housing should be for living in, not for speculation"?
    1
  16903.  @ewchi-m4n012  China has even launched space stations into orbit, the world's 3rd to do so after USA and USSR. China's first prototype space station, Tiangong-1 was launched in 2011, followed by Tiangong-2 in 2016. There was even a "space lecture" where Chinese taikonaut in space gave a lecture to her students on the ground from onboard Tiangong-1, demonstrating simple micro-gravity experiments in space. By doing this, we are showing our kids (and future generations of Chinese) that China is both ancient civilization as well as a modern space nation, capable of achieving equally impressive feats as the Westerners in space. China is no longer the sick man of Asia, in fact, China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, and India have not launched space stations of their own into orbit. Yet you claim Taiwan is doing better than the mainland?
    1
  16904.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou obviously i agree with that statement," Well, you never actually stated outright that you agreed with Xi's statement. In fact, looking back on our long conversation, it appears that you've almost never agreed with anything I wrote. It's like you harbor disdain for China's achievements under communist party leadership, and seemingly resort to smearing China's success at every opportunity. You said: "So if i say that china is is doing better than taiwan" But you never actually said that, you've been saying the reverse, that Taiwan is doing better than the mainland, without actually citing evidence. The most was you mentioning a handful of Taiwan companies, when it is the mainland companies that are dominating lists in reality. You said: "That thing could have succeded but now the taiwanese people want to mantain the status quo." And the status quo is that Taiwan is part of China, since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution nor has there been any formal declaration of independence. Such a declaration would be akin to changing the status quo which is a result that the majority of the people of Taiwan do not want. In the long run, the status quo leans towards reunification, because of China's immense economic growth facilitating economic integration of Taiwan with the mainland, and as long as peace prevails, it's inevitable that Taiwan will fully return back to China in the future. Time is on the side of reunification. You said: "And in all countries you can find affordable hosuing if you take the right opportunities when they appear," Well, why then did you bring up your Chinese neighbors remarks about a way more expensive and very crappy apartment in Shanghai had you known about such a thing? You should know about the range of houses, yet you seek to mock China at every opportunity.
    1
  16905.  @ewchi-m4n012  China is the world's first to land on the far side of the Moon. China's Chang'e-4 (嫦娥四号) achieved the first soft landing on the far side of the Moon, on 3 January 2019, using a relay satellite Queqiao (鹊桥 'Bridge of Magpies') The Chinese lunar rover Yutu-2 (玉兔二号 'Jade Rabbit 2') explored the Von Kármán crater on the Moon's far side, and even conducted experiments on the Moon such as growing cotton seeds on the Moon (first biological matter to be grown on the Moon) Through this, we are showing that Chinese people are just as capable as Westerners in space achievements, and that we are also pioneers in space exploration.
    1
  16906.  @ewchi-m4n012  If you claim Taiwan has total autonomy, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations? Is there some force that's preventing Taiwan from joining the United Nations like an independent country can? Why is it Taiwan cannot amend their constitution and formally declare independence without incurring serious consequences?
    1
  16907.  @ewchi-m4n012  You said: "but that doesn't give them the right to impose your authority to another place where most of it's people want them out." Do you actually have evidence that most of the people of Taiwan want out? You said that the people of Taiwan want to maintain the status quo, and the status quo like I said before many times, is that Taiwan is part of China under Taiwan's constitution. Any more to formally declare independence would be seen as changing the status quo, an outcome that the majority of the people of Taiwan do not want.
    1
  16908.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou and why are you involving the west? I've never compared china to the west." Well, because we've been comparing about Taiwan and the mainland many times now, and you don't seem to have anything of substance to support your claim that Taiwan is better off than the mainland, apart for a handful of companies from Taiwan to compete with mainland companies that dominate various lists. It's like you don't even know the actual situation of Taiwan, yet you claim that they are richer. Look up _"Taiwan's wage stagnation" and Taiwan’s minimum wage has stagnated for such a long time that some say the government needs to raise it by two to three times just to meet the cost of living or catch up with other advanced economies, including the 27 European Union (EU27) countries. But even if the government agree with an increase, it still barely meets Taiwan’s basic living expenses.
    1
  16909.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou Because of the chinese pressure, and that serious consequences will be from China in the from of a possible invasion." Congratulations, you've just proven that Taiwan isn't an independent country after all. I mean, they don't even have sovereignty over their own constitution, and they can't join the UN like an independent country can because of mainland pressure, so they aren't as "autonomous" as you claimed earlier, since the CPC exerts a level of control over the island.
    1
  16910.  @ewchi-m4n012  As for your wage comparison, what does your use of percentage achieve? 39.52% higher? 28.80% lower? Do people spend more money on rent than they do on food and groceries? What about transportation costs like bus fares, train fares, or the option to rent bicycles cheaply?
    1
  16911.  @ewchi-m4n012  More than 20% of Taiwanese under the age of 40 say they lack savings and 65% report they are in debt, according to new survey findings from a Taiwanese job site, highlighting the growing generational wealth gap here. Conducted by the job search website "yes123," the survey further revealed that only one-third of respondents said their income exceeds their expenses, while the rest said their income either only met their monthly needs or fell below them. Nearly half of all debt was attributed to tuition fees, followed by debt linked to loans, credit cards and vehicle expenses, according to respondents. Some 41.8% of respondents said their debt was high enough that they felt economic pressure. Source: VOA: Survey Shows Young Taiwanese Lack Savings, Are Highly Indebted
    1
  16912.  @ewchi-m4n012  China has even landed on Mars. On May 14 2021, China successfully landed our Mars Rover Zhurong (祝融) on the red planet as part of the Tianwen-1 (天问-1) space mission. This makes China the third country to successfully soft-land a spacecraft on Mars and establish communications from the surface, after the Soviet Union and United States. Yet you claim Taiwan is doing better than the mainland? Why hasn't Taiwan landed on Mars like mainland China has?
    1
  16913.  @ewchi-m4n012  We've already proven that Taiwan is not an independent country, because the Communist Party of China literally dictates the Taiwan constitution and prevents them from joining the UN like an independent country can. If your country don't even have sovereignty over your own constitution, and allow the CPC to dictate your constitution, then your country clearly isn't independent after all, it's part of China. That's why even till today, Taiwan's constitution states that Taiwan is part of China, and that it is unable to declare independence without incurring serious consequences. Even the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the rest of the UN countries recognize Taiwan as part of China, who are you trying to kid here?
    1
  16914.  @ewchi-m4n012  -Comparing Taipei with Chengdu, you would need around 24,351.61¥ (108,210.09NT$) in Taipei to maintain the same standard of life that you can have with 18,000.00¥ in Chengdu (assuming you rent in both cities). -Comparing Taipei with Changsha, you would need around 25,123.43¥ (111,639.81NT$) in Taipei to maintain the same standard of life that you can have with 15,000.00¥ in Changsha (assuming you rent in both cities). -Comparing Taipei with Xi'an, you would need around 24,992.77¥ (111,059.19NT$) in Taipei to maintain the same standard of life that you can have with 13,000.00¥ in Xi'an (assuming you rent in both cities). -Comparing Taipei with Qingdao, you would need around 24,372.80¥ (108,304.25NT$) in Taipei to maintain the same standard of life that you can have with 13,000.00¥ in Qingdao, Shandong (assuming you rent in both cities). -Comparing Taipei with Tianjin, you would need around 24,401.64¥ (108,432.43NT$) in Taipei to maintain the same standard of life that you can have with 16,000.00¥ in Tianjin (assuming you rent in both cities).
    1
  16915.  @ewchi-m4n012  By respecting the One China Policy, that means they acknowledge that Taiwan is part of China, that even Taiwan's constitution recognize Taiwan as a part of China. The fact that Taiwan cannot join the United Nations as an independent country shows that it's not independent and that the communist party exerts a level of control over Taiwan. Even in the Olympics, athletes from Taiwan can only compete under the banner of "Chinese Taipei". The People's Republic of China has our own constitution yes, but recently there have been amendments as of 2018, so what makes you claim China cannot amend our constitution? You asked: "why the taiwanese don't have the PRC nationality?" China is special in that we permit multiple governing systems to exist concurrently within our borders under the One Country, Two Systems policy. For example, Hong Kong has their own separate government, their own separate currency, separate passport, but Hong Kong is part of China. Same thing applies to Taiwan having their separate government, currency and passport, yet Taiwan is part of China under the One China policy. You said: "Or have to pay taxes to Peking?" Hong Kong citizens do not have to pay tax to Beijing either. This is part of China's special arrangement allowing separate governments and financial systems within our borders, yet those territories (i.e Hong Kong and Taiwan) are considered part of China (under 1 Country, 2 System and 1 China policy respectively).
    1
  16916.  @ewchi-m4n012  But you're trying to compare the people in Taiwan as somehow being richer than the mainland, yet you don't factor in the various cities in China then what's the point of your comparison? It's apparent that your earlier boast about the people of Taiwan being richer than the mainland is unable to be verified.
    1
  16917.  @ewchi-m4n012  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Yes it's verified bc the minimum wage in the richest city of taiwan is higher than in the richest city in china" That comparison is all wrong. You should be comparing the minimum wage of the poorest city in Taiwan with the highest wage in the richest city in mainland, if you want to boast that the people in Taiwan as somehow being richer than the mainland. Therefore, your comparison doesn't qualify, since you're comparing the minimum wage in the richest city of Taiwan.
    1
  16918.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou No, because in the case of hong kong and macau, can have a certain degree of self governance, but the central government control their foreign affairs" Well, it's the same with Taiwan. You've literally admitted this earlier that the central government in mainland China (i.e Beijing) literally controls Taiwan's foreign affairs, that's why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can. That means Taiwan is not an independent country after all, since the central government in Beijing controls Taiwan's foreign affairs. You said: "And even if the ccp "changes" the laws of taiwan as you are saying, that doesns't mean that the island will comply," Then why Taiwan cannot amend their constitution and formally declare independence without incurring serious consequences? This shows that Taiwan is not independent if they don't even have sovereignty over their own constitution.
    1
  16919.  @ewchi-m4n012  The United Kingdom for all intents and purposes, still recognize the One China policy that Taiwan is part of China, so we have already proven that the central government in mainland China (i.e Beijing) literally controls Taiwan's foreign affairs, that's why Taiwan is not officially recognized by the U.K. Therefore, Taiwan is not an independent country as we have discussed.
    1
  16920.  @ewchi-m4n012  The population of Taipei (2.6 million) makes up around 11% of Taiwan island's entire population (23 million). Whereas the population of Shanghai (26 million) makes up only 1% of mainland China's entire population (1.4 billion). Therefore, you're not comparing equivalents if you're comparing 11% of Taiwan's population with 1% of the mainland population.
    1
  16921.  @ewchi-m4n012  The United Kingdom recognizes the One China Policy that Taiwan as part of China, this already indicates the mainland's control over Taiwan's foreign affairs (as you've admitted earlier). No matter what Taiwan does, they cannot get the United Kingdom to officially recognize Taiwan, so isn't this an indication that Taiwan is not independent after all?
    1
  16922.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou yes, because if a country with 23 million inhabitants falls behind one of 2.6 million" What country of 23 million and one of 2.6 million are you talking about? Taiwan is not a country, it's part of China (as we've both agreed in the beginning), and by 2.6 million, are you referring to Taipei when you said one of 2.6 million? But Taipei is a city in Taiwan island, so I don't understand what the point of your comparison is. The fact remains that Taipei's population makes up 11% of Taiwan island's population, while Shanghai's population makes up 1% of the mainland's population. So you're not comparing equivalents if you're comparing 11% of Taiwan's population with 1% of the mainland population.
    1
  16923.  @ewchi-m4n012  You said: "神州 Shenzhou And that is when you fail, because china is a country way poorer than taiwan," I've previously pointed out that China has the world's 2nd largest number of billionaires according to Forbes Magazine, but you're unable to refute this fact. You said: "with provinces with wages below 200$." Again, wages doesn't necessarily translate to being rich or poor, it all depends on the cost of living in the provinces. Food, rent, clothing, utilities, public transport, etc are certainly cheaper in the Chinese provinces with wages below 200$. You said: "And i didn't mean 2.6, but 1.4 billion and 23.5 respectively," Once again, all you've shown is that 11% of Taiwan's population in Taiwan have a lower cost of living than 1% of mainland China's population in Shanghai. But you have not shown how the people of Taiwan are richer than the mainland, when you're comparing 11% of Taiwan with 1% of the mainland. However, if you've compared the poorest Taiwan city with the richest mainland city, then there could be a case for your argument, but since you didn't do that, your claim is therefore unverified.
    1
  16924.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou You aren't responding my question." Did you asked a question? I checked your previous comments and you did not ask any question, (since you there's no question mark) then why accuse me of not responding to your question when you didn't ask any? We've already shown that Taiwan's foreign affairs are controlled by the mainland, since even the United Kingdom does not recognize Taiwan even if Taiwan somehow wants them to, instead the UK recognizes Beijing as China, and adheres to the One-China policy that Taiwan is part of China. Even Taiwan's constitution reflects the claim that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  16925.  @ewchi-m4n012  You said: "Yes, there obviously are more billionaires in china, but if we compare it to the percentage of the population, acording to forbes magazine china have 539 billionaires and taiwan 51." Then how can you claim that mainland China is way poorer than Taiwan when we have more billionaires that Taiwan? You said: "We've already confirmed that the the minimum wage in taiwan leaves more money to spend, than in china even with the increased cost of living." No, that's only for Taipei, which represents 11% of the Taiwan's population, compared to Shanghai, which represents only 1% of the mainland's population. So what about the other 89% of Taiwan's population and 99% of mainland China's population? You said: " with the minimum wage in all of taiwan, $912, we can see that the cost varies in 200$," You specifically said: "with provinces with wages below 200$.", so I am referring to the cost of living in those provinces being cheaper. I've already previously shown this and I'll repeat it again: -Comparing Taipei with Chengdu, you would need around 24,351.61¥ (108,210.09NT$) in Taipei to maintain the same standard of life that you can have with 18,000.00¥ in Chengdu (assuming you rent in both cities). -Comparing Taipei with Changsha, you would need around 25,123.43¥ (111,639.81NT$) in Taipei to maintain the same standard of life that you can have with 15,000.00¥ in Changsha (assuming you rent in both cities). -Comparing Taipei with Xi'an, you would need around 24,992.77¥ (111,059.19NT$) in Taipei to maintain the same standard of life that you can have with 13,000.00¥ in Xi'an (assuming you rent in both cities). -Comparing Taipei with Qingdao, you would need around 24,372.80¥ (108,304.25NT$) in Taipei to maintain the same standard of life that you can have with 13,000.00¥ in Qingdao, Shandong (assuming you rent in both cities). -Comparing Taipei with Tianjin, you would need around 24,401.64¥ (108,432.43NT$) in Taipei to maintain the same standard of life that you can have with 16,000.00¥ in Tianjin (assuming you rent in both cities).
    1
  16926.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou they say that belongs to china, but not to the ccp." But UK does not recognize Taipei as the capital of China, instead they recognize Beijing. And since they recognize the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China, that means they acknowledge China s sovereignty over Taiwan.
    1
  16927.  @ewchi-m4n012  You said: "So they can consider that china is divided in 2 right now" That means UK considers Taiwan not as it's own separate country, but clearly part of China, so why do you keep on claiming Taiwan is independent? Even the UK recognize Taiwan as part of China, and we've already proven that Taiwan's foreign policy is controlled by the mainland, since Taiwan cannot get UK to recognize Taipei over Beijing.
    1
  16928.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou because i put that in comparisson to the countries population." No, you only compared 11% of Taiwan's population with 1% of mainland China's population, what about the remaining 89% of Taiwan's population and the 99% of mainland population? I've already pointed out different provinces have different costs of living, comparing Taipei with Chengdu, Changsha, Xi'an, Qingdao, etc. who have lower cost of living.
    1
  16929.  @ewchi-m4n012  Taiwan used to be one of Four Asian Tigers but since democracy was introduced to Taiwan, it's economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving for jobs in the mainland or Singapore "From the '90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreements on policy matters. This produced less effective policy making. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be more conservative in Taiwan, so they do not enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou, Research Fellow, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica Source: YouTube: How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents | Insight | CNA Insider
    1
  16930.  @ewchi-m4n012  Look, we've shown that Taiwan's foreign policies are controlled by the mainland, such that even the United Kingdom recognises Beijing over Taipei and also acknowledged the One China policy that Taiwan is part of China. Adding the fact that Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can, goes to show that Taiwan is not independent. Even you admitted earlier that the mainland exerts control over Taiwan.
    1
  16931.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou unofficialy speaking, but in reality yes they are different countries" But we've shown that countries all over the world recognize the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China (even you acknowledged the UK does show) and even Taiwan's own constitution states that Taiwan is part of China, and there remains the fact that Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can. That means Taiwan is certainly not independent.
    1
  16932.  @ewchi-m4n012  Taiwan has no official embassies in Australia, Canada, United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the rest of the European countries. Neither does Taiwan have official embassies in Japan, Korea, Vietnam, Thailand, etc, nor in the Middle East, so aren't you proving once again that the mainland indeed controls Taiwan's foreign policy? Even at the Olympics, why is it athletes from Taiwan can only compete under the name "Chinese Taipei"?
    1
  16933.  @ewchi-m4n012  But the fact that Taiwan has no official embassies in virtually every country in the world, already proves that the mainland controls Taiwan's foreign policy. Even if you claim other countries send diplomats to Taiwan, they still recognize Beijing over Taipei, because of the mainland's control over Taiwan's foreign policy, and they still adhere to the One China policy that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  16934.  @ewchi-m4n012  Polls have revealed that only a small minority of the people of Taiwan (5.6%) want independence, in fact the vast majority of the people of Taiwan (87%) want to maintain the status quo. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Any move to amend Taiwan's constitution and declare independence would be taken as changing the status quo which is an outcome that the majority of the people polled do not want.
    1
  16935.  @ewchi-m4n012  "And the only impediment is that china blocks any attempts to get the red light to be a member of the UN." Once again, you have proven that the mainland controls Taiwan's foreign policy so how has Taiwan met the so-called "requirements to do so"? And the UK and other nations all recognize Beijing over Taipei, they don't have any official Taiwan embassies, then Taiwan has clearly not met the requirements to be considered independent.
    1
  16936.  @ewchi-m4n012  Selling weapons to a certain doesn't necessarily mean that territory is independent. For example, many countries has been selling/giving weapons to Syrian rebels to fight against the Syrian government, but that doesn't mean that rebel-held parts of Syria are independent. In fact, sending those weapons to Taiwan is encouraging separatist activities in Taiwan which may potentially result in the next conflict between the U.S and China, yet many Western countries are continuing down this path.
    1
  16937.  @ewchi-m4n012  I mean, how are you actually related to Taiwan, that you would encourage Taiwan independence? Many people predict that the next hot conflict would possibly be over Taiwan, because mainland China has repeated stated that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and its a red line. Yet people like you are seemingly encouraging Taiwan to start a war that will not benefit them.
    1
  16938.  @ewchi-m4n012  Countries apart from China have fought civil wars of their own, most prominent is the American Civil War, where Americans were killing Americans. Or Vietnamese killing Vietnamese during the Vietnam War, or Koreans during Korean War, or any civil war for that matter. Likewise, the Chinese Civil War was fought over control over China, and it hasn't truly ended after the KMT lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Taiwan. If conflict does breaks out between the mainland and Taiwan, then it would be seen as a resumption of the Chinese Civil War. Imagine a hypothetical timeline of the American Civil War, in which instead of the North defeating the South and proclaiming the United States of America, imagine that some foreign power (maybe Britain) intervened to prevent the reunification of USA and we are left with two countries, North U.S and South U.S. Both sides claim to be the real U.S and that would be the scenario China faces today. Taiwan needs to reunify with the mainland as a matter of national interest of China.
    1
  16939.  @ewchi-m4n012  Again, just because region received weapons, doesn't necessarily mean that said region is independent. During the First Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons, ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla force with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help the Vietnamese fight for independence. From 1950 to 1954 the Chinese government shipped goods, materials, and medicine worth $43 billion (in 2019 dollars) to Vietnam. From 1950 to 1956 the Chinese government shipped 155,000 small arms, 58 million rounds of ammunition, 4,630 artillery pieces, 1,080,000 artillery shells, 840,000 hand grenades, 1,400,000 uniforms, 1,200 vehicles, 14,000 tons of food, and 26,000 tons of fuel to Vietnam. But it doesn't mean that said region is independent until they actually won their independence. As we have discussed before, Taiwan is not independent and hasn't met the requirements to do so.
    1
  16940.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou and that thing is intervening too, so isn't changing anything." But who said anything about intervening changing anything? The point remains that sending military aid to a region doesn't qualify it as being independent. And I still don't understand how you can claim "Yes they have all the requirements" when we've already shown that Taiwan cannot join the UN like an independent country can. Countries like the UK still recognize the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China, and recognize Beijing over Taipei, so how can you still claim they've met all the requirements?
    1
  16941.  @ewchi-m4n012  But Taiwan is not one of such legitimate country, since we've already shown that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution, and the fact that Taiwan's foreign policies are controlled by the mainland (by your admission.)
    1
  16942.  キャない  People like you and @Ewchi-M4n0 are the ones trying to promote Taiwan separatism, which could result in war between mainland and Taiwan (or a resumption of the previous Chinese Civil War that hasn't truly concluded), leading to loss of live and destruction of property. Much like NATO planning to fight Russia down to the very last drop of Ukrainian blod.
    1
  16943.  キャない  People like you and @Ewchi-M4n0 are the ones trying to promote Taiwan separatism, which could result in war between mainland and Taiwan (or a resumption of the previous Chinese Civil War that hasn't truly concluded), leading to loss of live and destruction of property.
    1
  16944.  キャない  Are people like you and Ewchi-M4n0 trying to provoke a possible war between Taiwan and the mainland by supporting separatism in the island?
    1
  16945.  キャない  Are you and Ewchi trying to provoke a war between Taiwan and mainland China?
    1
  16946.  @ewchi-m4n012  Taiwan isn't a sovereign country, they cannot even amend their constitution for crying out loud, how is that sovereign? You said: "And explain how taiwan foreign policy is controlled by the mainland" I've already did. Taiwan cannot get the United Kingdom to recognize Taipei over Beijing, and neither can Taiwan join the UN as an independent country can. That just proves Taiwan is not an independent country after all.
    1
  16947.  @ewchi-m4n012  I've already shown that only a minority (5.6%) in Taiwan want independence, whereas the majority (87%) want the status quo to continue. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Any move to formally declare independence would be taken as changing the status quo, an outcome that majority of the people in Taiwan do not want. Yet it seems you're under the false belief that Taiwan is independent.
    1
  16948.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou and they have a constitution, the roc constitution of the 40s." And the ROC 🇹🇼 constitution states that Taiwan is part of China, and they even claimed all of mainland China 🇨🇳 (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Wikipedia has a map of all the territory that the ROC claims: Source: Wikipedia: ROC Administrative and Claims And we've already shown that Taiwan cannot get the UK to recognize Taipei over Beijing.
    1
  16949.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou the status quo means that they are a soverign country" The status quo under Taiwan's constitution, is that Taiwan is part of China. Any move to amend their constitution or formally declare independence would be taken as changing the status quo, which is an outcome the majority of the people of Taiwan do not support.
    1
  16950.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou Yes they are part of china, but not of the People's republic of china." Given our endless arguments, I'm willing to settle for both of us coming to an agreement at least, that Taiwan is part of China. I am glad both of us are in agreement over this issue at least. As for not yet being (fully) part of the People's Republic of China, it's only a matter of time before reunification of Taiwan with the mainland occurs. Taiwan's ability to resist reunification stems from perceived U.S support. But it's no secret that the U.S is in decline and China is rising. As long as peace prevails, the U.S will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge mainland China's rise, by which then Taiwan's backing will evaporate and reunification becomes inevitable. Time is on the mainland's side, and the continuation of the status quo will further facilitate the economic integration of Taiwan with the mainland.
    1
  16951.  キャない  Yeah, it's a joke that the separatists in Taiwan would ever stand a chance against the People's Liberation Army if war breaks out between Taiwan and mainland China. Hopefully the separatists realized that they are outmatched and outgunned by the mainland.
    1
  16952.  @ewchi-m4n012  If anything, the crisis in Ukraine has revealed that for all its talk, the U.S isn't going to actually put boots on the ground to defend Ukraine. Hopefully the separatists in Taiwan wake up to the fact that the U.S doesn't care about Taiwan, as long as they can use it as a pawn to contain the mainland's rise.
    1
  16953.  @ewchi-m4n012  If anything, the crisis in Ukraine has revealed that for all its talk, the U.S isn't going to actually put boots on the ground to defend Ukraine. Hopefully the separatists in Taiwan wake up to the fact that the U.S doesn't care about Taiwan, as long as they can use it as a chess piece to contain the mainland's rise.
    1
  16954.  @ewchi-m4n012  If anything, the crisis in Ukraine has revealed that for all its talk, the U.S isn't going to actually put boots on the ground to defend Ukraine. Hopefully the separatists in Taiwan wake up to the fact that the U.S is using the island as a chess piece to contain the mainland's rise.
    1
  16955.  @ewchi-m4n012  If anything, the crisis in Ukraine has revealed that for all its talk, the U.S isn't going to actually put boots on the ground to defend Ukraine. Hopefully the separatists in Taiwan realize that the U.S won't do the same for Taiwan.
    1
  16956.  キャない  The People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) just recently launched our third aircraft carrier, the Type 003 Fujian (福建) named after the province that many of Chinese in Taiwan originated from. Its size classifies it as a super carrier, and it's equipped with the new electromagnetic catapult launch system (CATOBAR) that allows it to launch heavier aircraft that the earlier ski-jump designs of our previous aircraft carriers, the Liaoning and Shandong.
    1
  16957.  @ewchi-m4n012  You said: "just like the vietnam war or the afghanistan war" And we know how the Vietnam War and Afghan War abruptly ended, with American soldiers pulling out of those two countries in the Fall of Saigon (1975) and the Fall of Kabul (2021) respectively, and abandoning their South Vietnamese and Afghan allies in the process. Hopefully the separatists in Taiwan realize that the same thing might happen with the U.S towards Taiwan. "and still the russians are struggling to advance." From what I understand, Russian forces have already captured several Ukrainian cities like Maripol, Severodonetsk, Lysychansk, Melitopol, Kherson, and some of which are already hoisting the Soviet Flags, issuing Russian passports and accepting Russian currencies as legal tender.
    1
  16958. ​ @Cueil  "神州 Shenzhou using that logic parts of china belong to japan and england... and give mongolia back to its people." Japan and England are always welcome to try today and take back those places they stole from China. But know they would have to face the might of the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, if they intend to carve up China like a pie among themselves. Same goes for Mongolia if they want to attempt to recreate their empire.
    1
  16959.  @Cueil  "神州 Shenzhou Chinas model is successful for the Han Chinese" Are you sure? The ethnic minorities (i.e Tibetan, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchu, even Koreans) in China enjoy special privileges over the Han, such as tax exemption, priority in healthcare, free education for 15 years (9 years for Han), government bursaries and special education admission advantages. For example, if a Han candidate needs say 600 points to qualify for a certain university course, then ethnic minority candidate needs only say 400 points (easier to qualify) for the exact same course. Ethnic minorities in China are also exempted from the One Child Policy, meaning that they can have as many kids as they want. In fact, ethnic minorities proportion of the population in China has grown from 6.1% in 1953, to 8.04% in 1990, 8.41% in 2000, and 8.49% in 2010. ... Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    1
  16960.  @prettypants4824  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwan is the real china" If they are the real China, then why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lost the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan then? During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage, compared to the Nationalist Kuomintang, who had wealth (taxed from peasants) had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communist's right to rule China.
    1
  16961.  @ewchi-m4n012  You did not win any arguments, both of us came to the agreement that Taiwan is part of China (by your admission) so all your earlier claims of Taiwan being its own independent country are voided. Additionally, you stopped replying after my last comment to you, so I presumed you agreed with my points.
    1
  16962.  @desertmoonlee6631  Which part of our vast country of China did you visit? Many Chinese in fact tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead, whereas in contrast, many in the West (but not all) are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    1
  16963.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou no, bc you finished the debate, as i said my position hasn't changed," Correct, I finished the debate because there was no more response from you after my last comment. And your position has clearly changed. Both of us have at least come to the agreement that Taiwan is part of China (by your admission).
    1
  16964.  @ewchi-m4n012  "神州 Shenzhou Well, no, china is a territory, but taiwan is a country," That's not what you said earlier, you admitted that Taiwan is part of China. Here's your earlier words: "神州 Shenzhou Yes they are part of china, but not of the People's republic of china." And since that the Chinese Civil War has resulted in the KMT losing the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and having to flee to Taiwan, then if anything, it just demonstrates their gross incompetence to govern China, while cementing the communists right to rule China.
    1
  16965.  @ewchi-m4n012  Speaking of ctrl c ctrl v, China's top chipmaker, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp has made a breakthrough in manufacturing 7 nanometer chips, despite U.S sanctions. As a result, SMIC has likely advanced its production technology by two generations, defying US sanctions intended to halt the rise of China’s largest chipmaker.
    1
  16966.  @ewchi-m4n012  Don't you find information like this fascinating. That somehow, despite the U.S sanctions on chips, Chinese companies like SMIC are able to leapfrog by two generations and fabricate semiconductors using 7 nm technology?
    1
  16967.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  "神州 Shenzhou payment terms were discussed one month later. The logic makes no sense." Why not? It is not uncommon for payment for business transactions to be made later.
    1
  16968.  @David-og7di  According to Statista: Cumulative CO2 emissions worldwide 1750-2019, by country the United States is the world's largest CO2 emitter when you factor in the Industrial Revolution. Cumulative carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel combustion worldwide from 1750 to 2019, by major country 1. United States (410.24 billion metric tons) 2. China (219.99 billion metric tons) 3. Russia (113.88 billion metric tons) 4. Germany (91.98 billion metric tons) 5. United Kingdom (77.84 billion metric tons) ... Source: Statista: Cumulative CO2 emissions worldwide 1750-2019, by country
    1
  16969.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  "神州 Shenzhou payment terms were discussed one month later. The logic makes no sense." Why not? Cyrus Janssen had stated that he's very busy recently. He took some time to respond to CGTN's initial proposal to ask for permission to publish his video entitled: "Americans Don't Know The Truth About China" so it's possible that Cyrus was simply too busy and that's one possible reason why payment details were worked out later.
    1
  16970.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401 But since the end result was that Cyrus choose not to accept payment from CGTN, then does the payment terms even matter if the payment wasn't made at all?
    1
  16971.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Peng Shuai is expected to make a public appearance later to clarify the issue. She's probably avoiding the public eye at the moment because of the attention drawn by her accusation of sexual assault, so she's trying to protect her privacy, yet Western MSM are demanding her private life be exposed for the world to see (kinda like the paparazzi).
    1
  16972. @Nicolau Poceiro Do you have evidence that the voice is not her's? There's footage of Peng Shuai attending diners and award ceremonies for youth, and there was even a second video call between Peng Shuai and the IOC. She's probably just laying low for a while and avoiding the public eye until this whole matter goes away that's all.
    1
  16973. @Nicolau Poceiro "神州 Shenzhou Oh, that was not my idea. A commentator said that the voice might not have been hers," Does that commentator have evidence that the voice is not hers though? We have footage of Peng Shuai appearing in public, attending diners and award ceremonies for youth athletes. "Does she have health problems?" It's possible that she's suffering emotionally after having her previous affair with a much older man being revealed, and it may impact her health and mental health especially, which could be an explanation why Peng Shuai wants to lay low for a while and avoid the public eye. "Thinking about it, it would have been rather stupid for her to make such accusations on her social networks." Agreed, that's an unwise decision by Peng Shuai, there are many more appropriate channels to choose from. Now this private issue between Peng Shuai and Zhang Gaoli has been hijacked by Western MSM and the WTA, and seemingly blown out of proportion.
    1
  16974. +XAlpaca Zeu Corruption is universal phenomena but at least under President Xi, there are ongoing anti-corruption crackdowns in the CCP. But when is the last time USA had an corruption crackdown of its own? In my opinion, Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician, and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his presidential campaign. But after he became president, no further action being taken against Clinton.
    1
  16975. +Chirm Music China was having Chinese Civil War at that time, so of course Chinese people killed Chinese and China won. Just like in American Civil War, Americans killed Americans and America won. What sort of double standards are you applying here? And did you see how USA caused genocide of Native Americans, occupied their lands today, and imported slaves from Africa to do laborious work for them? Look, the European colonization of the Americas has one of the highest death tolls in the world. List of Wars by Death Toll wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_and_anthropogenic_disasters_by_death_toll As for free speech, what about Wikileaks whistleblower Edward Snowden, who's now a US fugitive and seeking asylum in Russia? What about USA funding bad and corrupted states like Saudi Arabia, where these is severe human rights violations (such as women not being allowed to drive)? Didn't President Trump just turn a blind eye to the Saudi Arabian Crown Prince and dismiss his involvement in the murder of a journalist? Trump 'stands with' Saudi Arabia and defends crown prince over Khashoggi theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/20/trump-saudi-arabia-jamal-khashoggi-crown-prince At least China supplies humanitarian aid to North Korea (such as food and medical supplies) but the USA just keep on slapping sanctions on DPRK and cause famine of its citizens. What about USA being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Libyan War, Afghan War, etc, bombing cities, killing civilians, destroying property, and causing those people to be homeless, jobless and without family, so they flock to join the terrorists. That's why when you eliminate one terrorist cell, another pops up back in its place. To me, all those unnecessary loss of lives by USA is much more serious than some repressed free speech or cracking down on dissidents or whatever.
    1
  16976. +Chirm Music Also, did you see Taiwan's midterm election where the pro-independence DPP suffered a major defeat and lost two of its major posts to the opposition? Even the pro-independence Taiwan President Tsai just resigned! because of this humiliating defeat, so doesn't that mean that the majority of people of Taiwan don't want independence? Since they voted against Tsai?
    1
  16977.  @kulturlemur  Dr Li Wenliang wasn't thrown into prison, he merely signed a form agreeing not to spread unproven rumours that's all and he returned to work afterwards.
    1
  16978. If you want to participate in political decision making in China, then you'll have to be the top 5% of your school or sector in order to join the communist party. There on you'll be put on probation for 1 year, before becoming a fully fledged member and then able to vote for policies that determine the course of China's future. In China, if you want to participate in political decision making, you'll have to devote your entire life to it.
    1
  16979. 谁啊？不认识你～
    1
  16980. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  16981. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16982. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  16983. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  16984. Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16985. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16986. Even Taiwan's own constitution acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  16987. Koreans like you like to fabricate history and claim that "Korean" countries defeated China, classifying Jin dynasty as Korean and so on.
    1
  16988.  @Andrew-ib7gs  So you're okay with criticising the Barrett's Chinese proficiency then why label me a troll for criticising your misspelling of Xinjiang as Xiangjiang? Even if you're trying to strawman the argument to misspelling an English word, why can't I criticise your English spelling (without being labelled as a troll), given that you're okay criticising the Barrett's Chinese proficiency? All I did was correct your misspelling that's all.
    1
  16989.  @Grendelmonster8u  Funny how you accuse the government in China of "seeing everything," yet people like Julian Assange and Edward Snowden have exposed the U.S monitoring it's allies activities. Even the SWIFT system is merely a means for the U.S government to monitor every transaction made using U.S Dollar.
    1
  16990.  @Grendelmonster8u  Funny how you accuse the government in China of "seeing everything," yet the SWIFT system exists as a means for the U.S government to monitor every transaction made using U.S Dollar. Who are you kidding?
    1
  16991.  @Grendelmonster8u  It's funny how you accused the government in China of seeing everything you do, yet Edward Snowden of Wikileaks has exposed the U.S monitoring their citizens conversations for keywords relating to terrorism. You have no proof of your accusations about China, and yet there is proof of U.S government monitoring.
    1
  16992. Gonzalo Lira is alive and well. Video:youtu.be/R2yeSOcNlgE
    1
  16993. China has 5000 years of history of rising and falling dynasties, and is considered one of the world's oldest "continous" civilizations still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have long since faded to history.
    1
  16994. +Uchiha Madara You clearly said: "神州 Shenzhou P R O P A G A N D A you're telling the half truth" So all I asked is which part is untrue that's all.
    1
  16995. Who is against reality here? Look at Tahir's daughter calling him a bad dad over the phone. Is it because he abandoned his wife and kids back in Urumqi to go study in Israel and never came back?
    1
  16996.  @sebg5145  China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/b8cCsUBYSkw This makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity, some 856.4 billion kilowatt hours a year – more than double the amount produced by Brazil, in second place. The top three is completed by Canada, which produces 376.7 billion kilowatt hours a year. Source: China produces the most electricity from hydroelectric power weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/
    1
  16997.  @matthewmorgan7106  Chiang kai-Shek even served in the Japanese Army from 1909 to 1911. He purged communists from KMT and their removal of Communists from within the ranks allowed him free reign to give himself what amounted to dictatorial power over much of China. Source: 11 Things You Should Know About Chiang Kai-shek https://theculturetrip.com/asia/taiwan/articles/11-things-know-chiang-kai-shek/ When the Japanese invaded Manchuria, Chiang refused to face the Japanese invaders, until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap him to get him to ally with the communists in a united front against the Japanese. (Xi'an Incident) Additionally, the Communists actually saved his leadership, and it’s often forgotten that without the Communists’ help, Chiang would never have survived as a political force, since was the communists who convinced the officers to release Chiang and allow him to take control of the government once again. Chiang’s efforts against the Japanese gained him some influential friends. And although the Communist General Mao was responsible for much of the damage inflicted upon the Japanese, it was Chiang who got the credit mainly from Britain and the US. When civil war broke out in China, Chiang expected help from the allies, but after a long campaign against both the Japanese and the Germans, the US and Britain were reluctant to get involved in a civil war. His Western ‘friends’ literally abandoned him. He suppressed local culture in Taiwan (White Terror) and was responsible for the imprisonment of 140,000 Taiwanese. These people were taken captive for their alleged opposition to the KMT. At this time, anyone openly criticizing the ruling party was deemed a Communist sympathizer. He held the Taiwan presidency for 25 years. He held the Taiwan under a permanent state of martial law, thus ensuring his power was absolute. In fact, the constitution only allowed for two terms in power, but with martial law as his excuse, Chiang could rule indefinitely.
    1
  16998.  @matthewmorgan7106  Chairman Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong can't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he'll wish for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism, not weaken China. Under Chairman Mao's leadership, China's population actually doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US So clearly, China has succeeded under the Communists whereas India hasn't surpassed China despite adopting Western brand of democracy, so why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    1
  16999.  @matthewmorgan7106  About the phrase: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." just look at global Covid-19 vaccine distribution. Rich countries are buying up all the vaccines making them unavailable for developing countries who desperately need it. For example, Canada has prebought enough Covid-19 vaccines for 5-7 times its population! Source: Canada the biggest hoarder of COVID-19 vaccine pre-orders in First World, NGOs say nationalpost.com/news/world/canada-the-biggest-hoarder-of-covid-19-vaccine-pre-orders-in-first-world-ngos-say Imagine 1 Canadian has access to 5 Covid-19 vaccines. Whereas 10 Africans have to fight over access to 1 vaccine. That's the cold and unfeeling nature of capitalism at work, where capitalists who can afford to hoard scarce supplies do so at the expense of others. Communism is the belief that every scarce resource should be allocated according to needs. Had we been living in communistic world, the scarce vaccine supply would go to those in urgent need, rather hoarded by the rich countries. But we live in a capitalistic world, not a communistic world.
    1
  17000. They don't realize just how racist it is, to use a yellow-tone bear with small eyes to refer to an Asian man. It's like calling Barack Obama King Kong.
    1
  17001. They don't realize just how racist it is, to use a yellow-tone bear with small eyes to refer to an Asian man.
    1
  17002. What was Scott Morrison thinking? It's like he doesn't know his own country's previous ties to France, before agreeing to enter a deal with USA. The funny thing is that the Joe Biden seems to have forgotten Morrison's name, he called him "that fella down under".
    1
  17003. China's Metaverse aims to transform cyberspace into real space. The U.S's Metaverse aims to transform real space into cyberspace.
    1
  17004. 逆境出人才。 Turn Adversity into Opportunity.
    1
  17005.    One restaurant in Beijing is making use of wheat straws obtained from the deep countryside in central China, to replace plastic straws. Video: Wheat straws: China's biodegradable alternative to plastic youtu.be/8tyK3FZviso They cost the same as plastic straws, are just as effective and completely biodegradable. And customers in the restaurant are supporting the move too.
    1
  17006.  @zilun  But for those who refuse to bring their own, then bamboo paper might prove to be a suitable alternative. Just like the use of wheat straws to replace plastic straws in that restaurant in Beijing.
    1
  17007.  @anthonyfuqua6988  "When Great Britain gave Hong Kong back to China in 1997. China promised it would remain free and capitalist. But last year democracy in Hong Kong died with the national security law." Mainland China did. But then the 2019 Hong Kong riots happened, then can't Beijing introduce Hong Kong National Security Law to stabilse Hong Kong (as it is today)? Hong Kong was long overdue for a National Security law anyway, even USA has their own National Security Law.
    1
  17008.  @anthonyfuqua6988  "I am behind Taiwan. Communist China have never set foot on Taiwan." If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  17009.  @MindyMa  You said: "Having CCP members threaten nuclear war toward Taiwan (ROC) several times a year surely is not a mindset most Americans comprehend." Show me where did the Communist Party of China ever threaten nuclear war over Taiwan (ROC)? Several times a year you say?
    1
  17010. @Dmon ! "Why do you act like Taiwan would choose a socialist party? Taiwan is not China, nor do they want to be." Taiwan's constitution claims that Taiwan is part of China. Go and read it. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their constitution.
    1
  17011.  @sarafoxy  You said: "Yes. Unfortunately China is the main anti peace force in the world right now." China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  17012. @Dmon ! "神州 Shenzhou are you too deluded to accept the fact that the majority of the Taiwanese people DONT think Taiwan is part of China?" At 18:17 John Oliver quotes polls for the people of Taiwan which state that 87% of them want to maintain the status quo. And as far as I know, the current status quo of Taiwan according to its own constitution, is that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  17013. @Dmon ! "神州 Shenzhou CCP clown conflates a poll about them not wanting hassle with them supporting China lmfao." I quoted actual polls at 18:17 of John Oliver videos which indicate that 87% of the people of Taiwan support the status quo (which according to Taiwan's constitution, is that Taiwan is part of China.) Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution, and that majority of the people of Taiwan want the status quo to continue. So you're unable to refute this simple point of mine?
    1
  17014. @Dmon ! If you claim Taiwan is an independent country, then why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations? A true independent country would be able to join the UN, yet is there some force that's preventing Taiwan from joining the UN?
    1
  17015. @Dmon ! If you claim Taiwan is an independent country, then where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? If not, then since there hasn't been any changes to Taiwan's constitution, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  17016. @Dmon ! Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar (Burma), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a Map of all the territory Taiwan claims (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg )
    1
  17017. @Dmon ! You said: "China butted in between an extradition bill between Hong Kong and Taiwan." The Hong Kong Extradition bill was proposed because of a certain event. A Hong Kong guy (named Chan) had murdered his pregnant girlfriend in Taiwan, and flew back to Hong Kong to evade the Taiwan authorities. Taiwan wanted Hong Kong to extradite this murderer to answer for his crimes in Taiwan, but Hong Kong discovered that it had no extradition treaty, and that's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the extradition bill to cover up this loophole. Do the Hong Kong protestors and rioters even know what the extradition bill is? Did they read it's contents in their entirety before taking to the streets to protest? Since the extradition bill has been cancelled, a Hong Kong murderer is allowed to roam free, and there is no justice for the victim's family members.
    1
  17018. @Dmon ! "神州 Shenzhou burden, a true independent country can also join the WHO," So has Taiwan joined the World Health Organization? Since Taiwan hasn't joined the WHO, then Taiwan is not a true independent country, according to you, since they cannot join the UN and the WHO.
    1
  17019. @Dmon ! "but you CCP trash instead pressure organisations and other countries to not do so." So you're admitting that Taiwan cannot join the United Nations and the World Health Organization, then it further reinforces my point that Taiwan is clearly not independent, since they cannot join the UN and the WHO like a true independent country could. Just like my earlier point that according to John Oliver polls (at 18:17 ) majority of the people of Taiwan want the status quo to continue, and the current status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  17020. @Dmon ! "神州 Shenzhou if China is so great, why won't you let these people decide what THEY want to do instead of forcing an action upon them?" China's current political system has shown to be viable (and extremely successful to boot) then why should China abandon our political system and adopt a Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    1
  17021. @Dmon ! "神州 Shenzhou useless burden, if the extradition bill was only between Hong Kong and Taiwan, then that murderer wouldn't be walking free..." The Extradition Bill was drafted up by Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam, and she choose to include the mainland in the draft (and why not?) then how is mainland China to blame? If had instead of Taiwan, the Hong Kong murderer choose to commit his crime in the mainland and flee to Hong Kong, then it would have been the same isn't it? Because the extradition bill has been scrapped, a Hong Kong murderer now roams free, and there's no justice for the victim's family members. But you're just trying to pin the blame on the Communist Party of China, because you can't refute my points
    1
  17022. @Dmon ! Why do you resort to hurling personal insults against me for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours? We both agree that according to John Oliver's poll at 18:17 the majority of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo. And the current status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. So instead of refuting this point of mine, you use crude vulgar words to insult me personally that's all?
    1
  17023. @Dmon ! "神州 Shenzhou how s**t is your life that you also don't want to acknowledge that Hong Kongs government is made up of pro CCP trash who even try to their futures by trying to invalidate/imprison their pro democracy opposition?" Hey, don't blame me for Hong Kong's system, blame the Western brand of democracy. Under such a system, Hong Kong is supposed to have a pro-Communist Party side isn't it? Then why blame me when that's part of the Western democracy which allows an opposition party? You're seemingly blaming me for the flaws of Western brand of democracy that's all.
    1
  17024. @Dmon ! "Thankfully Taiwans government isn't made up of pro CCP trash too" In 2006 the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) of Taiwan refused to renew the broadcasting licenses of media outlets supporting the KMT opposition, then why do you feign outrage in Hong Kong when Taiwan is literally doing the same thing to their opposition? Why the seemingly biased double standards here?
    1
  17025. @Dmon ! "神州 Shenzhou how s**t is your useless life that you keep regurgitating the poll when I literally told you that the poll of people wanting status quo DOES NOT MEAN TAIWANESE PEOPLE WANT TO BE PART OF MAINLAND CHINA" Hey that's not what you said, you said (and I quote your earlier words) "神州 Shenzhou are you too deluded to accept the fact that the majority of the Taiwanese people DONT think Taiwan is part of China?" Why'd suddenly you include the word mainland?
    1
  17026. @Dmon ! You said: "I already told you that the poll doesn't reflect whether Taiwanese citizens want to be part of China or not." Again, according to Taiwan's constitution, Taiwan is part of China and since according to John Oliver's poll that majority of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo, then it shows that the people of Taiwan want to continue the status quo that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. How have you refuted this point at all?
    1
  17027. @Dmon ! "神州 Shenzhou imagine how much better off the rest of Asia would be if shi**ole China didn't exist to hinder them..." China is currently the world's second largest economy and a major economic engine for world, especially Asia. China's economic growth has benefited many Asian countries (many of whom have China as their largest trading partner) then why are you claiming China is hindering the Asian countries? China's rise literally represents Asia's rise on the global stage.
    1
  17028.  @sarafoxy  "神州 Shenzhou last time I checked China is threatening to take over Taiwan. Take some responsibility." According to Taiwan's constitution, Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a Map of all the territory Taiwan claims (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Since Taiwan can claim the mainland, then can't mainland China claim Taiwan? Take some responsibility for what you are saying.
    1
  17029. @Dmon ! "神州 Shenzhou why don't you want to admit how s**t your life is that all you can do is try and make excuses and push half truths?" Half-truths? You're the one boldly claiming TAIWAN IS AN INDEPENDENT COUNTRY yet why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations and the World Health Organization? Then Taiwan is clearly not an independent country, isn't it?
    1
  17030. @Dmon ! "神州 Shenzhou You keep spewing excuses and cherry picking what to respond to and ignoring the facts that show how trash China is..." Trash? China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    1
  17031. @Dmon ! "Clown, I listed multiple examples of why the rest of Asia would be better off if China didn't exist. Are you going to keep ignoring them?" Why resort to verbal abuse against me for my views, just because my views happen to differ from yours? If not for mainland China, then Hong Kong would still be British colony today had the 1997 Hong Kong handover not happened because of mainland China. And the rest of the countries have multiple intersecting claims in the South China Sea, so what is your point then? "Are you too useless to compound that countries can form trading partners with other countries if China didn't exist?" None of the other countries in Asia have risen to the level that China has, so China's economic growth literally brings about prosperity and recognition to Asia. Clearly, China's growth is what's driving Asia's economic growth, yet you're claiming the rest of Asia would be better off if China didn't exist?
    1
  17032.  @anthonyfuqua6988  "神州 Shenzhou That's because Taiwan also claims to be the sole legitimate government of China. The constitution is saying that it is a part of the PRC." If Taiwan was the sole legitimate government of China, then why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all their advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the Communists' right to rule China.
    1
  17033.  @anthonyfuqua6988  "神州 Shenzhou Why not let Taiwan vote for its government? Because it would be 95%-5% in favor of continuing as the Republic of China or Taiwan." I don't understand your first point, does this not happen in Taiwan? Doesn't Taiwan clearly hold elections for their government (in which the latest, the DPP won the majority vote)? Then what do you mean by letting Taiwan vote for its government? As for your second point, it's true that a huge majority of the people of Taiwan support the status quo (in favor of continuing as the Republic of China ) that means the people of Taiwan agree that Taiwan is part of China under ROC's constitution.
    1
  17034. @Dmon ! "神州 Shenzhou how s**t is your life that you don't want to admit how trash the CCP is?" More crude language and personal insults. Previously, China was a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past under the ROC, but fast forward to today, and China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made-In-China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  17035.  @anthonyfuqua6988  Earlier you said: "The last 70 years Taiwan has built an amazing economy and transitioned from a dictatorship under Chiang Kai-Shek into a representative democracy." Taiwan's success was clearly built upon authoritarianism. Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    1
  17036.  @anthonyfuqua6988  Earlier you said: "I know his corporate bosses wanted him to apologize but I'm tired of everything having to be censored because Hollywood wants to make money in China." China is arguably the largest movie market for Hollywood outside of the USA and that's why Hollywood wants to make money in China and cater to Chinese tastes. But China doesn't force Hollywood to do that, they did so of their own accord. If anything is to be blamed, then shouldn't you be blaming the capitalists since they are the ones who want to make money here?
    1
  17037.  @anthonyfuqua6988  "神州 Shenzhou Cut the s**t." Such crude language? Majority of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo to continue. And the status quo, according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. This is the point that you are unable to refute all along.
    1
  17038.  @anthonyfuqua6988  Earlier you complained about John Cena apologising because of Hollywood wanting to make money in China, than this is the result of capitalism that you praise in Hong Kong and in Taiwan, then can't you see the hypocrisy in your words?
    1
  17039.  @anthonyfuqua6988  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    1
  17040.  @anthonyfuqua6988  "神州 Shenzhou I complain about the authoritarian bent of the Chinese regime." Authoritarian? China never point a gun at Hollywood, they want to make money in China, so they cater their films to suit Chinese tastes then how is it authoritarian? It's clearly the fault of capitalism that drives Hollywood's actions then why blame China?
    1
  17041.  @anthonyfuqua6988  The Taiwan constitution clearly state that Taiwan is part of China and since John Oliver's polls indicate that majority of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo, that means they want to remain part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  17042.  @anthonyfuqua6988  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the USA is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  17043.  @anthonyfuqua6988  About China's "president for life" China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US short term leadership.
    1
  17044.  @anthonyfuqua6988  What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Before 2019, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  17045.  @anthonyfuqua6988  "神州 Shenzhou Yes and ask the people of Taiwan if they want to be part of China." Taiwan IS a part of China under Taiwan's constitution and since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, it is part of China, then why should I ask the people of Taiwan if they want to be part of China? They already are! And how would China even invade ourselves?
    1
  17046.  @anthonyfuqua6988  What concentration camps are you referring to? USA has Guantanamo Bay Detention Center in operation. As for Tibet, it was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and made those territory part of Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet. Tibet broke free of China in 1912 but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1952, when the Tibetans signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet.
    1
  17047.  @anthonyfuqua6988  Again, about John Cena apologizing because Hollywood wants to make money in China, that's a byproduct of capitalism because capitalists are willing to do anything to make profits. China doesn't point a gun at Hollywood, they are always welcome to depict their videos as they please elsewhere, but if they want to be shown in China, then they will be subject to Chinese laws while in China. Yet you rather blame China when it's the work of capitalism at play here?
    1
  17048.  @anthonyfuqua6988  Previously, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered under authoritarian single-party Kuomintang rule, and it's now suffering under the Western brand of democracy, the Taiwan parliament fight among themselves , throwing water balloons (they actually prepared those ahead?). The question is that since Taiwan worked well under authoritarianism, then why abandon their system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Video: Taiwanese parliament broke out into a water balloon and chair-throwing brawl youtu.be/mMvkusAI9DM
    1
  17049.  @anthonyfuqua6988  "神州 Shenzhou Tibet was independent until 1959." Tibet was part of Yuan Dynasty China and Qing Dynasty China, just look up maps of China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Even ROC Taiwan claimed Tibet, Mongolia, etc, according to it's constitution yet you're suddenly conveniently ignoring and seemingly blaming China for everything? And the Tibetans themselves sign the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1952, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet.
    1
  17050.  @anthonyfuqua6988  If there was really concentration camps for Uighurs, then where are the Uighur refugees? During the Holocaust there was an influx of Jew refugees fleeing Germany. Myanmar had that Rohingya crisis and its neighbors have Rohingya refugees. When the U.S pulled out of Kabul, there were Afghan refugees fleeing Afghanistan... But where are the Uighur refugees if there was supposedly concentration camps for Uighurs in China?
    1
  17051.  @anthonyfuqua6988   According to Tibetologist Melvyn Goldstein, according to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid. "Their feeling of duress derives from the general Chinese threat to use military force again in Central Tibet if an agreement was not concluded. However, according to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid." - Tibetologist Melvyn Goldstein
    1
  17052.  @fireturkeyfly11  Negative news? It's apparent that US-China relations are deteriorating and this could potentially lead to a war scenario, which would not only be disastrous for China and US, but also for the rest of the world. Because Western anti-China propaganda is deliberately painting China in a negative light and "demonising" our country, in order to justify launching a war against China to Western citizens. Yet you claim I'm brainwashed when you apparently can't see how badly Western media is making China out to be?
    1
  17053.  @Kevin-sc3ro  From your words, it appears that you look down on Chinese athletes, China's gold medals and even Chinese workers who work hard to make products cheap so that the cost of living in America is lower than it should be. It's thanks to affordable Chinese goods that Americans saved money on living expenses, but you chose to degrade Chinese workers with insulting terms, then how long will Americans survive without Chinese goods?
    1
  17054.  @rsdch  Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Chairman Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    1
  17055.  @rsdch  Chinese media is regulated by the government so that fake news is weeded out, but in the United States, the media is unregulated and this result in explosion of fake news spreading like a cancer among Americans. Look to the 6th Jan Capital Hill riots for example of fake news infecting Americans.
    1
  17056.  @fireturkeyfly11  No, it's really is because Western MSM is anti-China in nature. I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad in the West, and I was appalled at the sheer amount of anti-China propaganda in the West. Whenever I try to bring up China's positive achievements under the Communist Party of China, many Westerners (but not all) just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill, and told me to "Go back to China if you like it there!" Even though many of these people never even set foot inside China and see what life is like here for themselves.
    1
  17057.  @fireturkeyfly11  For example, the once reputable Western media like the BBC have been caught applying "gray filters" in their portrayal of Wuhan, sparking uproar in China over the lack of journalistic integrity of the BBC. Surely you can spot the sheer amount of Western anti-China propaganda out there, how is this an imagining that the world is against China? And you're claiming Chinese are behaving like "spoilt children" and "throwing a tantrum" over the unfair portrayal of China by Western media?
    1
  17058.  @fireturkeyfly11  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" ROC, China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the PRC in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  17059.  @fireturkeyfly11  Here we have the reputable media BBC deliberately applying "gray filters" to a vlogger in China, making the green trees in the background appear grey (Video:youtu.be/3gI7AZFx5Q0 ) and how is this fair journalism? It literally destroys the BBC reputation for journalistic integrity.
    1
  17060.  @fireturkeyfly11  "神州 Shenzhou what you said is right, and what I said about you is also right." I cited examples to support my argument, but thus far you have not cited anything to support yours, then what makes you claim what you said about me is right? This is what you wrote about me earlier: "神州 Shenzhou you don't hear your master Xi clearly: the Party does not promote negative news, not fake news. You are brain washed to muddle then together." But where's your evidence to support your claim that I'm brainwashed to muddle them together?
    1
  17061.  @fireturkeyfly11  "神州 Shenzhou I have already told you. Read my earlier statements." Hey, I have exposed the BBC anti-China propaganda when they applied "gray filters" to make the green trees in China appear gray, this is clearly a malicious act for the once reputable BBC to paint China in a negative light and their should be a public outcry over their journalistic integrity. But what evidence have you quoted to support your claims about me? Earlier you said: "神州 Shenzhou you don't hear your master Xi clearly: the Party does not promote negative news, not fake news. You are brain washed to muddle then together." But where's your evidence to support your claim that I'm brainwashed to muddle them together? You just hurl accusations against me without proof?
    1
  17062.  @fireturkeyfly11  "神州 Shenzhou go and listen to his speech in the previous people Congress meetings. You should know that better." Could you point out what is wrong with President Xi's speech in the previous NPC & CPPCC meetings? President Xi has outlined a future for China, striving to achieve a "moderately prosperous society" through lifting millions of people out of poverty and into the middle class. He is concerned with environmental protection and protecting China's ecology. He will also not tolerate any foreign powers attempting to promote separatist activities in China's internal affairs, in Hong Kong, Xinjiang, Tibet, Taiwan, etc. Also, where does President Xi Jinping's speech show that I muddle fake news and negative news together?
    1
  17063.  @fireturkeyfly11  "That’s not my point. My point is that ‘all the crows appear black anywhere in the world’. Chinese news outlets are not innocent too." Alright, then could you show me an example from Chinese news? I've already shown an example of the once-reputable BBC clearly adding "gray filters" to make green trees in China appear gray, but thus far, you've given nothing to support your claims. And that's not your point, you said (and I quote your words) "神州 Shenzhou what you said is right, and what I said about you is also right." but so far, you've shown nothing to show what you said about me is right. "Is just that your mind is so twisted you can’t see the other side:" I literally quoted an example from the other side, from the once-reputable BBC applying "gray filters" then why accuse me of not being about to see from the other side? Have you yourself actually been to China and "seen from the other side" yourself? "a bird that’s been caged for so long she does not know how to fly even when the cage is removed." You're like someone viewing China with tainted glasses (possibly by the BBC) and even after the glasses have been lifted, you've been so used to seeing China with tinted glasses that you just cannot see China for what it is, through untainted lenses.
    1
  17064.  @fireturkeyfly11  You said: "There are so many things going right and so many more things go wrong in China internally. The whole core system in the society is corrupt." Yes, China has problems just like every other country. Corruption is a universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree and President Xi Jinping has vowed to tackle the mountain of corruption inherent with the communist party. Several high ranking and low ranking communist officials have been arrested for corruption, but when is the last time a country like the United States had a corruption crackdown of it's own? For example, Hilary Clinton is corrupt politician, and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his presidential campaign. But after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption. "The Party is trying to patch this and that but never the core issues." So what are the core issues? Tackling poverty? The Communist Party has lifted millions of people out of poverty into middle-income class. Granted it's not perfect, but it shows the CPC's commitment to tackling the core issues. Tackling corruption? President Xi Jinping has anti-corruption crackdowns like I mentioned earlier. Tackling pollution? China has built the world's largest hydroelectric power station, Three Gorges Dam to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: Largest Dam in the World youtu.be/j3J196bLP5E "It is majority of common Chinese people suffer, big time." Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself? Life is improving everyday in China. According to a recent Harvard University and Ash Center study, around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    1
  17065.  @mikef6399  Indeed. Imperial Japan committed numerous wartime atrocities like Nanjing Massacre, Unit 731, and comfort women. During the Nanjing Massacre, Japanese soldiers butchered Chinese men for sport, and held contest to see who could rack up the most kills. Chinese women were gangaped and killed, their naked bodies left exposed and mutilated, their groins bayoneted or having sharp sticks of bamboo shoved in. The young and elderly weren't spared, and Japanese soldiers sliced open the bodies of babies to violate them. Japanese forced families to perform acts of incense; Sons were forced to do their mothers and fathers to daughters. Pregnant women were gangaped and had their swollen bellies stabbed, the unborn fetus torn from their wombs and bayoneted right before their eyes. What did Chinese people do to deserve this? All Chinese people wanted to do was to defend our lands, and protect our homes and loved ones from the Japanese invaders, who stole our lands, plundered our wealth, killed our men and gangaped our women.
    1
  17066.  @achillesrodriguezxx3958  About the South China Sea, the North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    1
  17067.  @achillesrodriguezxx3958  China isn't the only one building islands in the South China Sea, Vietnam is also constructing artificial islands in the South China Sea. Video: Vietnam builds islands in South China Sea businessinsider.com/vietnam-building-islands-in-south-china-sea-2016-5 Vietnam has started projects mostly within the past two years of constructing islands. Altogether, the Center for Strategic and International Studies' Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative has documented 10 sites of Vietnamese construction throughout the region.
    1
  17068.  @achillesrodriguezxx3958  Scarborough shoals was part of China since a 1279 Yuan dynasty map and subsequent surveys by the royal astronomer Guo Shoujing carried out during Kublai Khan's reign established that Scarborough Shoal (then called Zhongsha islands) were used since the thirteenth century by Chinese fishermen. Why should China give up our ancestral fishing grounds then?
    1
  17069.  @achillesrodriguezxx3958  South Vietnam eventually lost to North Vietnam when the mighty US army lost the Vietnam War to starving communist Vietnam peasants and pulled out South Vietnam, abandoning it to their fate, so why is North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng statement suddenly invalid?
    1
  17070.  @achillesrodriguezxx3958  "神州 Shenzhou So are you gonna say my country singapore is" historically Chinese" and say its a part of the PRC just because my ancestors immigrated from there?" No, I am not saying that Singapore is historically Chinese just because your ancestors immigrated from China. Singapore was not part of any Chinese Dynasty, but the South China Sea Islands (Spratly and Paracel) were historically part of China, so why can't China reclaim our ancestral fishing grounds? Also your county Singapore is not a claimant in the South China Sea Islands, so why are you so fixated against China's claims to the South China Sea?
    1
  17071.  @achillesrodriguezxx3958  "So technically, China invaded South Vietnam and not North Vietnam" North Vietnam eventually defeated South Vietnam and since they agreed that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese, then why can't China reclaim our ancestral territory then? And North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese.
    1
  17072.  @achillesrodriguezxx3958  After Japaness WWII surrender, they signed the 1945 treaty (Potsdam Declaration) to relinquish control over all their occupied territories and limit Japanese sovereignty to the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, and Shikoku as part of the terms of the surrender treaty, so it was Japan who signed the treaty to cede the lands they occupied back to China. Japan also occupied Singapore during the war, so are you suggesting that Singapore should be given back to Japan? I mean, earlier you made the statement "神州 Shenzhou So are you gonna say my country singapore is "historically Chinese" and say it's a part of PRC" when I never said such a thing.
    1
  17073.  @achillesrodriguezxx3958  Singapore and China actually share many similarities in our political system. For example, Singapore has been ruled by authoritarian single-party government for its entire life as a nation. For over 50 years, the People's Action Party (PAP) has ruled Singapore with an iron fist and Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore’s founder) was a dictator who jailed or exiled his dissidents and political rivals. But under authoritarian single-party PAP rule, Singapore flourished from once being a sleepy fishing village nation, into a first-class country with among the highest standards of living in the world. Likewise, China has been under authoritarian single-party CCP rule for 70 years and China has since transformed from once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into an economic powerhouse today, the world's factory (Made in China) a growing scientific and technological power, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army.
    1
  17074.  @achillesrodriguezxx3958  "PRC is exploiting the 200 mile maritime rule rule to expand... Sooner or later you will start claiming islands further south and it will become my country's conflict soon" Which islands south are within 200 nautical miles of Singapore, in which China can (supposedly) exploit to infringe upon Singapore’s territorial sovereignty? Can you name me those islands within 200 NM of Singapore in which China can supposedly launch a territorial claim? If not, then doesn't that mean that you are simply fear-mongering without any proof of your claims? And while mainland China did indeed confiscate military equipment from Singapore Army, we later released them back to Singapore. Your ships stopped at Hong Kong port and are subject to Hong Kong Semi Autonomous Region laws while docked in Hong Kong. China’s Foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said China is currently verifying the related details when asked if Singapore has to contact the Chinese Foreign Ministry for the release of the vehicles. Source: China comments on SAF armoured vehicles and equipment seized, as SAF sends officers to Hong Kong straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/saf-team-on-their-way-to-hong-kong-to-address-security-of-seized-equipment "All people and goods entering Hong Kong Special Administrative Region should follow the laws of the SAR. I'd like to reiterate that the Chinese government firmly opposes any of the countries that has diplomatic ties with us to have any form of official exchanges with Taiwan, including defence exchanges and cooperation," said Mr Geng in response to another related question. Your ship docked at our harbour then you should obey our laws.
    1
  17075.  @achillesrodriguezxx3958  "There's a reason singapore maintains ties to Taiwan because many of the Chinese here are descendents of the KMT who fled China after the takeover" Are you sure this is the case? The KMT fled the mainland in 1949, whereas Singapore already had a significant Chinese population as early as 1826, more than a century earlier. The Chinese quickly formed the majority of the population in Singapore, by the census of 1826 there were already more Chinese (6,088) than Malays (4,790) excluding Bugis (1,242) and Javanese (267). The Chinese became the dominant group by the 1830s (the largest ethnic group at 45.9% in the 1836 census), and by 1849, 52.8% of the total population of 52,891 were Chinese. The Chinese population reached over 70% of the total by 1901 and has stayed there since. Source: Chinese Singaporeans wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Singaporeans#1819–1937 So what makes you claim that many of the Chinese in Singapore are descendents of the KMT who fled the mainland? Are you really a Chinese Singaporean if you don't even know your background history?
    1
  17076.  @achillesrodriguezxx3958  Why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 even lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 then? Nobody expected the Chinese communists to triumph over the KMT, yet here we are today.
    1
  17077.  @achillesrodriguezxx3958  China first claimed South China Sea Islands back in 1947 when Republic of China 🇹🇼 published the 11 Dash Line Map. The People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 9 Dash Line is based upon the ROC's 11 Dash Line, so even during your grandfather's time, ROC claims South China Sea Islands. The USA supported China's claim and they gave ROC a destroyer, USS Decker (DE-47) which was renamed ROCS Tai Ping (太平) to help liberate the SCS islands from Japanese occupation. One of the SCS islands was renamed Taiping Island by ROC, in honor of the vessels that liberated it.
    1
  17078.  @EmperorCQX  "神州 Shenzhou Well as a fellow Singaporean I will reply to both of you guys" But you only highlighted my name in your post instead of both. You said: "Overall I am sure that China will not claim any island that is of Singapore’s sovereignty" That's exactly what I said, because Achilles said that China will expand beyond the 200 NM and infringe upon Singapore’s sovereignty. And about the South China Sea, the North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    1
  17079.  @EmperorCQX  "I believe Achilles is not against the rise of China but rather unsure whether we have a friendly giant or an aggressive one due to its early inception as uncooperative (post Deng's administration)" Achilles has been against China's rise at the beginning, so what makes you think he isn't? He's been supporting every other country (Philippines, South Vietnam, even Japan) over China so how is he not against China, you tell me? I mean, China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  17080.  @EmperorCQX  "The only thing that I am worried is the attitude of Chinese news (sounded demanding) and local beliefs that Singapore is anti-China which is prominent when my parents made a visit to my fiance's family." I've visited Singapore before, and while generally most Singaporeans are polite, there are some of those anti-Chinese Singaporeans (who are Chinese themselves) that simply look down on mainlanders. They berate mainlanders just for opening our mouths and speaking Mandarin (even though Mandarin is one of Singapore’s national languages) and say that Chinese are not welcome in Singapore. They complain about Chinese "foreign talent" stealing their jobs, even the low-paying jobs like bus-drivers, construction workers, train operators, etc. It's because many Singaporeans themselves aren't willing to work for low wages, that's why foreigners (including Chinese) take up these jobs. So are the local beliefs that Singapore is anti-China, unfounded? Some Singapore news also tend to be anti-China in some regards too.
    1
  17081.  @EmperorCQX  "神州 Shenzhou That is incorrect, most Singaporeans are not Anti-Chinese" Firstly, did I say anything incorrect? Did I ever said that "Most Singaporeans are Anti-Chinese?" I never said that "Overall, Singaporeans are Anti-Chinese" I only said that some anti-Chinese people exist in Singapore so why are you making it such that I'm painting all Singaporeans as anti-Chinese? Secondly, if your own Singapore workers demand higher wages than the "foreign talent" (even in higher skilled capabilities) then why can't companies hire mainland Chinese workers? Some unsatisfied Singaporeans even blame Chinese workers for willing to work for lower wages than them.
    1
  17082.  @EmperorCQX  "Thirdly I do not see any news agency backed by our government is Anti-China... China state media said that Singapore is an ally of the US which had already twisted the facts and that is only one of examples." Singapore IS an ally of the US, so who's twisting facts here? For example, the USA regularly sends US aircraft carrier strike groups to the South China Sea waters and these warships dock at Singapore’s Changi Naval Base. And how does Chinese state media portray Anti-Singapore message? Here is a cooperation between Singapore and China on construction of cities in China. Video: Singapore is building a city in China youtu.be/iP11XeIV1ZA Video: How has Sino-Singapore Guangzhou Knowledge City changed in two years? youtu.be/0Ao5UH1j10Q So what Anti-Singapore Chinese state media are you talking about?
    1
  17083.  @EmperorCQX  "神州 Shenzhou 神州 Shenzhou 神州 Shenzhou 神州 Shenzhou It is incorrect, as you already stated 'some Singaporeans' and we both understand the case - thus can it be used as an argument in my initial discussion as a justifying means for the attitude of anti Singapore on the grass root level?" Yes, I said 'some Singaporeans' but I clearly never said that all Singaporeans are Anti-Chinese, so why are you making it such that I'm painting all Singaporeans as anti-Chinese? I never said anything incorrectly (look, I even said that" generally most Singaporeans are polite") so why are you making me out as painting all Singaporeans as anti-Chinese? And it's not just anti-Chinese sentiments in jobs, there are some Singaporeans landowners who refuse to rent apartments to Chinese nationals. Source: In Singapore, Vitriol Against Chinese Newcomers nytimes.com/2012/07/27/world/asia/in-singapore-vitriol-against-newcomers-from-mainland-china.html Source: 'No Indians No PRCs': Singapore's rental discrimination problem bbc.com/news/world-asia-26832115
    1
  17084.  @EmperorCQX  "In fact when I read 'berate for speaking Mandarin,' who told you that? I speak Mandarin all the time same as most Singaporeans who have the proficiency to do so. I was never berated by anyone." That's exactly the kind of double standards that I'm talking about. When Singaporeans speak Mandarin, nobody cares, but when Chinese national does it, some Singaporeans are against mainlanders speaking Mandarin? What biased double standards is this? Here's a video of Singaporean scolding a Chinese worker from China, just for speaking Mandarin in Singapore. Video: Singaporean scolds worker from China for not speaking English youtu.be/ygm-SoTU6aQ So why the double standards here? And I never said that all Singaporeans are Anti-Chinese (though you have repeatedly tried to paint that stance onto me) I clearly said that only 'some Singaporeans' are Anti-Chinese that's all (and I illustrated using examples) so how am I incorrect, you tell me? "I mentioned on my very first post to you, the social problems brought into our society, is without any groundless accusations" When did you ever said this? You said that "The only thing that I am worried is the attitude of Chinese news (sounded demanding) and local beliefs that Singapore is anti-China, which is very prominent when my parents made a visit to my fiance's family." so where did you ever said that the social problems brought into society, is without groundless accusations? I've already given some examples of how mainland Chinese are discriminated in jobs and housing (and even just speaking Mandarin in Singapore) yet you continually dismiss my claims that's all. "And does that justify a nation wide brain washing by Chinese backed media (I forgot which CCTV but it was aired on TV with misleading info)" Excuse me, but you can't even remember which Chinese backed state media you are talking about, then what makes you think that there's nation wide brainwashing of Anti-Singapore stance by Chinese state media? Where's your proof? You forgot? Then how to respond to your claim when you can't even provide adequate proof of your claims?
    1
  17085.  @EmperorCQX  You said "There is no point in trying to be righteous how about multiple scams that Chinese citizens initially had on local populace.... One of many social problems" https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/victims-china-officials-impersonation-scam-cheated-s188-million-jan-nov-2019-police I have read your article but whoever said that Chinese citizens are behind the China officials impersonation scams? Where does it say that the scammers are Chinese citizens as detailed in your source? You're just being biased against Chinese citizens that's all and hurling groundless accusations against us mainlanders. Upon doing further research into China officials impersonation scam, it's actually revealed that Malaysian scammers are behind the China officials impersonation scam, so why are you so quick to blame Chinese citizens for this particular scam? You assume that just because it's a "China official impersonation scam," means that Chinese citizens are behind the scam? Here are the sources showing that Malaysians are behind the scam. Two Malaysian men have been arrested for their suspected involvement in a series of China officials impersonation scams, the Singapore Police Force (SPF) announced at a press conference Source: 2 Malaysians arrested in China officials impersonation scam syndicate; S$590,000 seized channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/2-malaysian-men-arrested-in-china-officials-impersonation-scam-10384422 Source: Malaysian man nabbed over China officials impersonation scams involving more than $200k straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/malaysian-man-nabbed-over-china-officials-impersonation-scams-involving-more Police arrested a third Malaysian man for his suspected involvement in an impersonation scam that took place in 2017 and cost a woman almost $5.4 million. Source: Singapore impersonation scam: Woman lost about $5.4 million, police arrest Malaysian man ibtimes.sg/singapore-impersonation-scam-woman-lost-about-5-4-million-police-arrest-malaysian-man-28798 So why blame Chinese citizens when it Malaysians that are behind the China officials impersonation scam? You're just biased against Chinese mainlanders that's all, by jumping to conclusions that Chinese citizens are behind the scam.
    1
  17086.  @EmperorCQX  "神州 Shenzhou 神州 Shenzhou 神州 Shenzhou 神州 Shenzhou 神州 Shenzhou 神州 Shenzhou 神州 Shenzhou 神州 Shenzhou 神州 Shenzhou 神州 Shenzhou You see, that's the thing, you are trying to illustrate your point by using small amount of cases of bad individuals to make a stand point." Because I never said that all Singaporeans are Anti-Chinese, I clearly only said 'some Singaporeans' so that's why I only use a small amount of cases to illustrate my point. Otherwise, how else am I going to prove my logic, you tell me? I never said that "Overall, Singaporeans are Anti-Chinese" it was you who made such a claim yourself. And there really is double standards, because you Singaporeans don't get ridiculed for speaking Mandarin, but somehow, some Singaporeans ridicule mainlanders just for speaking Mandarin? There clearly exists a double standard, so why are you constantly denying it then? I mean, I'm the one illustrating some anti-Chinese bias by Singaporeans, whereas you said that Chinese state media is Anti-Singapore, yet you can't even quote a single example of how exactly is Chinese backed media Anti-Singapore. You conveniently forgot which CCTV it is, then apparently the problem lies with you, not me. I give examples of anti-Chinese behaviour expressed by some Singaporeans, but you've given me nothing about Anti-Singapore sentiment by Chinese state media. It wasn't in your first post? Another mistake it seems? You said "the social problems brought into society, is without groundless accusations" then is there anything wrong when I bring up the case of Singaporean scolding a Chinese worker from China for not speaking English? It is a grounded accusation after all, yet you still keep saying I'm incorrect? You said: "And please for goodness sake, it was last year when I was watching local TV in China, as I was there to watch the entire program." You watched the entire program on local TV in China? Then why can't you remember the name of the documentary that you watched completely? I mean, you've given me nothing to work with, no title, no program, so how do you expect me to find out the contents of the program you watched, you tell me? You're making an accusation on China being Anti-Singapore based on a single program, then you automatically assumed that Chinese state media is Anti-Singapore? You said: "So you are telling me that the Anti - China Singapore sentiment is not true in China? Oh boy, this do not need any proof, there is a substantial amount in China and both you and I know that." Firstly, what is Anti - China Singapore sentiment? Do you perhaps mean Anti China-Singapore relations sentiment? Because I've shown earlier that Chinese media praising the Sino-Singapore Guangzhou Knowledge City partnership, yet you still insist that Chinese backed media is Anti-Singapore? Why don't you give me the example? You forgot? But you watched the entire program you said. I mean, why don't you ever offer any example (whatsoever) of Anti-Singapore sentiment expressed in China? I mean, I've given you numerous examples of anti-Chinese sentiments expressed in Singapore, but you given me nothing. Just talk without proof. And once again, I'm not saying that all Singaporeans are Anti-Chinese, I'm only saying 'some Singaporeans are Anti-Chinese' that's all.
    1
  17087.  @EmperorCQX  Why don't you respond to the topic of "Chinese official impersonation scams" that you yourself brought up? You apparently think that the scam was perpetrated by Chinese citizens, when I already shown that it was actually Malaysians that were behind the China officials impersonation scam, so why are you blaming Chinese citizens when it was revealed that Malaysian scammers were actually were behind it? Two Malaysian men have been arrested for their suspected involvement in a series of China officials impersonation scams, the Singapore Police Force. Source: 2 Malaysians arrested in China officials impersonation scam syndicate; S$590,000 seized channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/2-malaysian-men-arrested-in-china-officials-impersonation-scam-10384422 Source: Malaysian man nabbed over China officials impersonation scams involving more than $200k straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/malaysian-man-nabbed-over-china-officials-impersonation-scams-involving-more Here's the direct source from the Singapore Police Force. In November 2017, a victim of a China Officials Impersonation scam lost about S$5.4 million to scammers after she was led to believe that she had to surrender all her monies to the authorities to assist in investigations. Police investigations revealed that she delivered her money to different strangers at various locations in Singapore over a one-week period. The suspects then left Singapore after committing the crime. On 14 May 2018, one of the suspects, a 31-year-old Malaysian man, was arrested in Kuala Lumpur for his suspected involvement in the scam. With the assistance of the Royal Malaysia Police, the suspect was brought back to Singapore on 15 May 2018. He will be charged in court on 16 May 2018 with dishonestly receiving stolen property. Source: Malaysian Arrested for Involvement in China Officials Impersonation Scam police.gov.sg/media-room/news/20180515_malaysian_arrested_for_involvement_in_china_officials_impersonation_scam_cad In June 2018, the Police received reports from at least six victims of China officials impersonation scam. The victims received phone calls from scammers claiming to be from the Chinese authorities, and that the victims were the subjects of a criminal probe in China. The scammers instructed them to either transfer their monies to other bank accounts or pass cash to a ‘police officer’ for investigation. Further investigations revealed that the victims lost S$208,600 in total, and the funds were all delivered to a man who was believed to have carried cash out of Singapore. Through follow-up investigations, officers from the Commercial Affairs Department established the identity of the 25-year-old Malaysian man, but he had already fled Singapore. On 12 July 2019, with the assistance of the Royal Malaysia Police, the man was arrested in Kuala Lumpur for his suspected involvement in the scams and brought back to Singapore on 13 July 2019. Source: Malaysian Arrested for Involvement in China Officials Impersonation Scam police.gov.sg/Media-Room/News/20190714_malaysian_arr_for_china_official_impersonation_scam_cad
    1
  17088.  @EmperorCQX  "神州 Shenzhou Excuse me? I did respond to that." Apparently you didn't, you made no more mention of the China officials impersonation scam after I shown that Malaysians were behind the scam, not Chinese citizens like you so accused. Why'd you automatically think that Chinese citizens were behind the scam?
    1
  17089.  @EmperorCQX  "神州 Shenzhou I did, please check" I logged out of my 神州 Shenzhou account and return to this comment thread and nowhere did you actually respond to me after I revealed that it was actually Malaysians that were behind the scam, instead of Chinese citizens like you accused. I mean, why'd you jump to conclusions and suspect that it was Chinese Citizens behind the scams in the first place?
    1
  17090.  @karmayeshi5042  Here's a video of modern day Lhasa, Tibet, China (filmed by WildFilmsIndia) and you can see how developed Lhasa has become under communist party rule. Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, and modern technology like cars, telephone cables, computers, smartphones, WiFi, the Internet, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo (By WildFilmsIndia) Even the poorest Tibetan farmer can afford a smartphone, connect to the Internet and shop online in Taobao and have his purchases shipped all the way to Tibet in the Himalayas. Because Tibet is part of China after all.
    1
  17091.  @karmayeshi5042  Who said that Tibetan are minority in Tibet? The demographics of Tibet is composed of the following: Ethnic composition of Tibet -90% Tibetan -8% Han -0.3% Monpa -0.3% Hui -0.2% others So how exactly are Tibetans outnumbered in Tibet? And China has constructed numerous hydroelectric powerstation in Tibet, like Ngari Hydro Power Station[1] 阿里水电站, Pangduo Hydro Power Station[2] 旁多水电站, Zhikong Hydro Power Station 直孔水电站, Bayu Hydro Power Station 巴玉水电站, Dagu Hydro Power Station 大古水电站, Zangmu Hydro Power Station 藏木水电站, Jiacha Hydro Power Station 加查水电站, Lengda Hydro Power Station 冷达水电站, and so on. Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region
    1
  17092.  @karmayeshi5042  I was talking about religion in Tibet in my previous comment, did you even read my comment? As for killing millions of Tibetans, the Tibetan population in China has steadily grown over the years, because ethnic minorities in China aren't subject to the One Child Policy (that Han Chinese are subject to) so Tibetans can have as many children as they want. Here's statistics for the population of Tibetans in China from 1953–2010. Population of Tibetans in China from 1953–2010 1953: 2,775,622 1964 : 2,501,174 1982: 3,821,950 1990: 4,593,072 2000: 5,416,021 2010: 6,282,187 Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Population_of_China_according_to_ethnic_group_in_censuses_1953%E2%80%932010 So the number of Tibetans in China has increased over the years, what killing millions of Tibetans are you talking about? As for the self-immolation, just because a hundred Tibetans decide to self immolate, sudden means that all 6 million Tibetans want to be free? What sort of logic is this? And the 150 self-immolators occurred from 2009 to 2017 over a period of 8 years. But look at self-immolation in India and as many as 1,451 and 1,584 self-immolations were reported there in 2000 and 2001, respectively. The practice continues, notably in India: as many as 1,451 and 1,584 self-immolations were reported there in 2000 and 2001, respectively. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-immolation And mind you, that's over a thousand self immolations in 1 year, compared to mere hundred self immolations in Tibet over a period of 8 years, so which is more urgent? These 150 Tibetan self immolations don't represent all 6 million Tibetans living in China, why should Chinese government bow down to these hundred or so self immolations then?
    1
  17093.  @karmayeshi5042  False data? Where's your actual data then, since all you done is dismiss my sources and insult me as brainwashed? I cite sources to support my arguments, but you give absolutely nothing to support your arguments. 6 million Tibetans on 1950? Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so how to sustain a population of 6 million Tibetans in 1950s? Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CCP, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    1
  17094.  @karmayeshi5042  Who are you to tell me not to bring up certain topics to support my arguments. At least I gave numerous sources to support my arguments, but all you done is dismiss my sources and insult me as brainwashed, even when you given zero evidence to support your claims so who do you think you are? Here's a another video of foreign girl (Where's Poppy) visiting Lhasa and you can see that religion is alive and well in Tibet, with numerous religious Tibetans praying, preforming full-body prostrates and spinning "prayer tops" and Tibetan monks performing debates inside temples. Video: First Day in Lhasa, Tibet youtu.be/3WetplXVVUo (By Where's Poppy) Aftee reading your comments, I can tell that you're just anti-China and biased against China that's all, you care absolutely nothing for China's interests nor do you wish to see China succeed.
    1
  17095.  @karmayeshi5042  You think every Tibetan wants to grow up as either Tibetan monk or yak farmer? Why should Tibetans be cut off from the modern world because of your old-fashioned views? You want Tibet to remain dirt-poor and cut off from the modern world, just because Tibet was like that in the past? It's thanks to China building the first Tibetan colleges in Tibet that allow Tibetans to expand their jobs. Why should Tibetans only be monks or farmers, cut off from the outside world? Because you say so? Here's a list of Tibetan universities. -Tibet University (西藏大学) -Tibet Minzu University (西藏民族学院) -Tibet Vocational Technical College (西藏职业技术学院) -Tibet Police Officers Institute (西藏警官高等专科学校) Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet So why should Tibetans remain backward and cut off from the modern world, just because you say so?
    1
  17096. Without the protestors wearing masks, Hong Kong Police tear gas will be more effective. No more picking up and throwing teargas cannisters back.
    1
  17097. @John Davis Huawei Technologies Co holds 56,492 active patents on telecommunications, networking and other high-tech inventions worldwide, according to Anaqua’s AcclaimIP, so why do you claim Huawei stole technologies? Source: Huawei Has 56,492 Patents and It's Not Afraid to Use Them bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-14/huawei-has-56-492-patents-and-it-s-not-afraid-to-use-them
    1
  17098. @John Davis Chinese smartphone brands actually dominate the 2019 Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands according to this source: mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html Top 10 Global Mobile Phone Brands in 2019 brands: 1st Place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) This shows that Chinese technology is getting better and better everyday.
    1
  17099. 老实说整体是过去15年到20年多数台湾人的薪水没有任何提高，实际收入没有增加，经济是下滑的、社会是分裂的、政治是冲突的，这也是为什么台湾很多老百姓抱怨不满，各种各样的问题。
    1
  17100.  @nathanb5579  China has offered to extend the "One Country, Two Systems" policy to include Taiwan, to allow them to keep their own government, while allowing the mainland to keep ours, while being a unified China. No democractic country in the world ever had such a policy where they tolerated two different systems to exist within its borders. It's as though North Korea and South Korea agree to unify under a single Korea, while allowing both to keep their own respective governments. But Taiwan rejected this offer and did not offer a counter proposal of its own.
    1
  17101.  @hangtuah888  It's sad that ordinary citizens don't bother to gather information. It's even sadder when the country's government get duped by Western media, as it shifts us back away from a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, to a uni-polar world dominated by the voices of USA and the West. I heard that even Malaysia has denied entry to a Russian-flagged tanker to dock at its port.
    1
  17102. Agreed. Many Westerners (but not all) seem to think the Communist Party of China controls absolutely everything in China. But the fact is it's actually the local municipal governments of Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Shanghai, etc, that handle outbreaks in their cities.
    1
  17103.  @Yitphin  Back in 2021, Twitter had suspended the account of the POTUS after the events of Jan 6th, even though he was still technically the POTUS at that time.
    1
  17104. Some other Asian countries like Japan and Singapore aren't implementing a vaccine mandate either, so it doesn't necessarily mean that a mandate is the solution here.
    1
  17105.  @syafsmith5085  Singaporeans shouldn't let down their guard, just because there hasn't been a more than 100 jump in cases. The situation can always change overnight.
    1
  17106.  @syafsmith5085  Source: Singapore to Close Schools, Most Workplaces With Rising Virus Cases bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-03/singapore-pm-says-more-steps-coming-on-virus-lee-speaks-at-4pm Singapore will impose stricter measures, that will include closing most workplaces and move to full home-based learning in schools, amid rising cases of local coronavirus infections.
    1
  17107.  @robezy0  Singapore's PM is literally imposing partial lockdown on the country. Video: Singapore to close most workplaces for one month youtu.be/HawLDWSL-lc
    1
  17108.  @syafsmith5085  "Singapore has never had a more than 100 jump in cases in one day unlike other countries." Singapore's health ministry on Sunday (April 5) confirmed 120 more Covid-19 (coronavirus) cases, the most new infections reported in a single day for the city-state. Source: Singapore reports 120 new coronavirus cases in record daily jump thestar.com.my/news/regional/2020/04/05/singapore-reports-120-new-coronavirus-cases-in-record-daily-jump
    1
  17109.  @syafsmith5085  "Singapore has never had a more than 100 jump in cases in one day unlike other countries." Source: Singapore reports 106 new cases of COVID-19, with 52 linked to existing channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/singapore-new-covid-19-cases-apr-7-moh-existing-clusters-12617084 Singapore reported 106 new COVID-19 cases on Tuesday (Apr 7), bringing the national total to 1,481, the Ministry of Health (MOH) said in its daily update.
    1
  17110.  @robezy0  Because there are asymptomatic cases in Singapore where people exhibit no symptoms but spread Covid-19 unknowingly. That's why wearing a mask helps reduce the spreading of asymptomatic infection. Source: 10 patients in S'pore got virus from those without symptoms: Study straitstimes.com/singapore/health/10-patients-in-spore-got-virus-from-those-without-symptoms-study
    1
  17111.  @robezy0  Even with a lockdown (Singapore government uses euphemism of circuit breaker) there are still many who flout the the new rules) Source: COVID-19: Fines, prosecution in court for repeat offenders of 'circuit breaker' measures channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/covid-19-fines-prosecution-for-repeat-offenders-safe-distancing-12624402
    1
  17112.  @syafsmith5085  "Singapore has never had a more than 100 jump in cases in one day unlike other countries." Source: Singapore reports record spike of 142 new COVID-19 cases; channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/covid-19-singapore-new-cases-linked-clusters-s11-dormitory-12621514
    1
  17113.  @joshlewis575  Cyrus Janssen's message that if U.S and China cooperate, then the whole world benefits from this cooperation. Are you saying that Cyrus' message of peaceful cooperation is the same talking point as the CPC? Then isn't this a positive message for the world?
    1
  17114. Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous relationship with a much older man has been exposed and she has expressed a desire for personal privacy during the videocall with IOC. But the WTA is demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see, instead of respecting her wishes for privacy.
    1
  17115.  @MarkYeung1  Humanitarian War? NATO's bombing campaign caused damage to 25,000 homes, 69 schools and 176 cultural monuments. Furthermore, 19 hospitals and 20 health centers were damaged, including the University Hospital Center Dr Dragiša Mišović. Not to mention the use of depleted uranium ammunition by the NATO forces. In total, between 9 and 11 tonnes of depleted uranium munitions were dropped across all of Yugoslavia, with payloads delivered by A-10 Thunderbolts and Tomahawk cruise missiles. How's this considered "humanitarian intervention"? Given that Yugoslavia did not bomb any NATO member and Article 5 wasn't activated, this proves that NATO is not a defensive organization (since they can bomb other countries even if NATO members weren't attacked first), then doesn't this make the organization a threat towards Russia, of whom NATO has been expanding eastwards towards?
    1
  17116.  @MarkYeung1  Humanitarian War? NATO's bombing campaign caused damage to 25,000 homes, 69 schools and 176 cultural monuments. Furthermore, 19 hospitals and 20 health centers were damaged, including the University Hospital Center Dr Dragiša Mišović. Also notably was the considerable usage of depleted uranium munitions. In total, between 9 and 11 tonnes of DU munitions were dropped across all of Yugoslavia, with payloads delivered by A-10 Thunderbolts and Tomahawk cruise missiles. How's this considered "humanitarian intervention"? Given that Yugoslavia did not attack any NATO member first, then how does this make NATO a defensive alliance? They can bomb whoever they want to, regardless of Article 5, then doesn't this make the organization a threat towards Russia, of whom NATO has been expanding eastwards towards?
    1
  17117.  @MarkYeung1  Vietnam had launched a full-scale invasion of Kampuchea (i.e Cambodia) in 1978. China had tried to mediate peace talks between the two sides, however the two governments could not reach a compromise. In the end, the Vietnamese overthrew the UN recognized Government of Kampuchea, and occupied Cambodia. Cambodia is China's ally at that time, so the China launched a punitive mission into Vietnam, aiming to capture the capitals of its border provinces in order to force its withdrawal from Cambodia.
    1
  17118.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "If China was justified to invade Vietnam, then why did it have to withdraw so quickly." Because it's a punitive mission where the primary objective is to punish Vietnam for their occupation of Cambodia. China had no intention to occupy Vietnam, which was why Beijing had declared that the gate to Hanoi was open and then withdrew afterwards. "Vietnam had occupied Cambodia for many years afterward. Your logic doesn't make sense." Vietnam's occupation of Cambodia would have been even longer had China not launched this punitive expedition. The majority of diplomats and analysts concluded that China's long-term strategy was to stretch Vietnamese resources by having the Vietnamese divert their resources from other problems to the border conflict. China's operation successfully forced Vietnam to withdraw units such as the 2nd Corps, from the invasion forces of Cambodia to reinforce the defense of Hanoi. Through this expedition, China also strengthened its relations with ASEAN countries – particularly Thailand and Singapore – due to their fear of Vietnamese aggression. Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew wrote in 2000: "The Western press wrote off the Chinese punitive action as a failure. I believe it changed the history of East Asia."
    1
  17119.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Several former Yugoslavia countries have even joined NATO" It's a process called balkanization. NATO bombed Yugoslavia into smaller pieces, and then absorbed the pieces into itself, resulting in NATO enlargement and further encroachment towards Russia. Therefore, how are you not able to see NATO's expansion towards Russia as an aggressive move? We've already demonstrated that NATO can bomb countries even though no NATO member was attacked, and that doing so actually creates opportunities to add more countries into NATO's fold.
    1
  17120.  @MarkYeung1  It's not just my assumption, it's also the view of the majority of diplomats and analysts, having concluded that China's long-term strategy was to stretch Vietnamese resources by having the Vietnamese divert their resources from other problems to the border conflict. The Vietnamese government had to spend money on maintaining a military presence at the Chinese-Vietnamese border, as well as on supporting its pupet government in Cambodia, so it represented a drain on Vietnam's scarce resources and economic conditions were bad throughout Vietnam. Like I said, take it from Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, who wrote in 2000: "The Western press wrote off the Chinese punitive action as a failure. I believe it changed the history of East Asia." Had China's not launch its expedition, Vietnam may think it able to just launch an invasion on another country with impunity and occupy it like it did with Cambodia, so it's possible that China's expedition dissuaded Vietnam/
    1
  17121.  @MarkYeung1  It's because USA and EU countries continue to send billions of dollars in military aid to Ukraine, that's why Ukraine keep on fighting a losing war. Earlier you mentioned North Korean ammunition and Iranian drones assisting Russia, but you neglect to mention the tanks (i.e Abrams, Leopard, Challenger, etc) and missiles (ATACMS, Javelins, etc) that NATO countries are sending to Ukraine (let alone the _F-16 fighter jets). Clearly, the conflict in Ukraine is being prolonged due to continued NATO shipments to Ukraine.
    1
  17122.  @Ben-mw9vz  Arms shipments do prolong wars, they increase a losing country's capacity to continue fighting against inevitable odds. If you take away the military aid, then Ukraine would be forced to surrender. But because USA and EU continue sending pledging more support for Ukraine, that's why the conflict will continue, when Zelenskyy should be suing for peace. As for "Tenacity," look up Ukraine conscription officers going door-to-door to round up as many young Ukrainian men as they can get. Sadly, even older men are being recruited and given just weeks of training before being sent to the front. Not to mention the Ukrainians migrating abroad to escape conscription. Russia doesn't need more land, but what Russia wants is regional security. As I've elaborated, NATO is expanding eastwards towards Russia's borders, and NATO is most certainly not a defensive organization. Ukraine applying to join NATO was the last straw. Had Ukraine remain a neutral buffer zone between Russia and NATO, then Russia would not be forced to launch this special military operation. Russia doesn't need more land, but if the conquered land can be turned into a buffer zone against NATO, then that's what Russia will do. Just like US doesn't tolerate Soviet missiles in Cuba, neither will Russia tolerate NATO in its region.
    1
  17123.  @Ben-mw9vz  Arms shipments do prolong wars, they increase a losing country's capacity to continue fighting against inevitable odds. If you take away the military aid, then Ukraine would be forced to surrender. But because USA and EU continue sending pledging more support for Ukraine, that's why the conflict will continue, when Zelenskyy should be suing for peace. As for "Tenacity," look up Ukraine conscription officers going door-to-door to round up as many young Ukrainian men as they can get. Sadly, even older men are being recruited and given just weeks of training before being sent to the front. Not to mention the Ukrainians migrating abroad to escape conscription.
    1
  17124.  @Ben-mw9vz  Arms shipments do prolong wars, they increase a losing country's capacity to continue fighting against inevitable odds. If you take away the military aid, then Ukraine would be forced to surrender. But because USA and EU continue sending pledging more support for Ukraine, that's why the conflict will continue, when Zelenskyy should be suing for peace. Russia doesn't need more land, but what Russia wants is regional security. As I've elaborated, NATO is expanding eastwards towards Russia's borders, and NATO is most certainly not a defensive organization. Ukraine applying to join NATO was the last straw. Had Ukraine remain a neutral buffer zone between Russia and NATO, then Russia would not be forced to launch this special military operation. Russia doesn't need more land, but if the conquered land can be turned into a buffer zone against NATO, then that's what Russia will do. Just like US doesn't tolerate Soviet missiles in Cuba, neither will Russia tolerate NATO in its region.
    1
  17125.  @MarkYeung1  The Japanese invasion of China is fundamentally different from Russia's special military operation. Firstly, China wasn't historically part of Japan, whereas Ukraine was historically part of Tsarist Russia as well as the Soviet Union later. Crimea Oblast was originally Russian territory, but was transferred to Ukraine to celebrate the 300th anniversary of Ukraine entering the Soviet Union. Many Ukrainians in Crimea speak Russian and in the 2014 Crimean Referendum, the overwhelming majority (96%) voted to join the Russian Federation. This is vastly different compared to the Japanese invasion of Manchuria (which was on 1931, not 1937 like you claimed).
    1
  17126.  @MarkYeung1  Because in 2014 Ukraine, there was Maiidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) resulting a coup that replaced the Russia-friendly Ukrainian President Yanukovych, with a US pupet government. Before 2014, Ukraine was a largely neutral country that served as a buffer between NATO and Russia. But after the coup, the Russian language was banned in Western Ukraine and Crimea wanted out, which was why the 2014 referendum resulted in Crimea joining the Russian Federation. From 2014 onwards, Ukraine launched an internal civil war in Donetsk and Luhansk (it's own territorials) against the Russian-speaking Ukrainians living there. According to UN statistics, some 14,000 people have been killed in the War in Donbas. You speak of homes being burnt, civilians killed and families torn apart, well it was ongoing in Donbas since 2014. And by their own Ukrainian forces no less. The Minsk Agreements were meant to bring an end to the bloodshed, but the agreement was not followed through. In the end Russia decided to recognize the two republics Donetsk and Lughansk and launch a special military operation to bring an end to a long, ongoing war.
    1
  17127.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "That's why the Chinese government refused to surrender to the more powerful Japanese army" The Chinese government at that time was the Kuomintang (KMT) led by Chiang kai-Shek and he was reluctant to meet the Japanese invaders head on. Chiang actually served in the Imperial Japanese army and spent two years, which was why he didn't want to fight the Japanese. Instead, he continued to purged CPC members (our own fellow Chinese) which was deeply unpopular among many groups in China, until two of his subordinates Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, decided to kidnap Chiang to get him to ally with CPC against the Japanese. This incident was the Xi'An incident, and many people had wanted to execute Chiang. It was thanks to CPC members Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release that Chiang finally agreed to ally with CPC to fight against the Japanese invaders. Otherwise, he would have continued purging his own fellow Chinese rather than face the Japanese invaders.
    1
  17128. ​ @MarkYeung1  "The United States provided $25 million dollars of military aids to China in 1940 and $125 million dollars of land lease funds in 1941," That US military aid was largely pocketed by the Kuomintang. KMT officials had hoarded the material, armament and military-aid funding provided by the US, and the corruption had gotten so bad that even US President Truman made a remark about the hoarding and wrote that the "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", having taken $750 million in US aid. "That's one of the reasons why your ancestors and my ancestors survived the war." My ancestors survived by remaining in the motherland and fighting for China, not from depending on so-called US military aid. There are other Chinese that left the mainland to seek a new life elsewhere, they may be your ancestors. Or perhaps your ancestors may be the KMT who fled to Taiwan island after they pocketed the US military aid, well then it might be true. "44 million Ukrainians are grateful that USA and other countries are providing military aids so that Ukrainians can fight for their survival." The longer the conflict in Ukraine is prolonged, the more territory Ukraine loses (i.e Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporiza, etc) until there may not even be a Ukraine existence at the end of the SMO. The only way Ukraine can survive is if Zelenskyy sued for peace and the US and NATO stopped sending military aid to Ukraine and prolonging the inevitable.
    1
  17129.  @MarkYeung1  "The United States provided $25 million dollars of military aids to China in 1940 and $125 million dollars of land lease funds in 1941," That US military aid was largely pocketed by the Kuomintang. KMT officials had hoarded the material, armament and military-aid funding provided by the US, and the corruption had gotten so bad that even US President Truman made a remark about the hoarding and wrote that the "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", having taken $750 million in US aid.
    1
  17130.  @MarkYeung1  "The United States provided $25 million dollars of military aids to China in 1940 and $125 million dollars of land lease funds in 1941," That US military aid was largely pocketed by the Kuomintang. KMT officials had hoarded the material, armament and military-aid funding provided by the US. It had gotten so bad that even US President Truman made a remark about the hoarding and wrote that the "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", having taken $750 million in US aid. "That's one of the reasons why your ancestors and my ancestors survived the war." My ancestors survived by remaining in the motherland and fighting for China, not from depending on so-called US military aid. There are other Chinese that left the mainland to seek a new life elsewhere, they may be your ancestors. Or perhaps your ancestors may be the KMT who fled to Taiwan island after they pocketed the US military aid, well then it might be true. "44 million Ukrainians are grateful that USA and other countries are providing military aids so that Ukrainians can fight for their survival." The longer the conflict in Ukraine is prolonged, the more territory Ukraine loses (i.e Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporiza, etc) until there may not even be a Ukraine existence at the end of the SMO. The only way Ukraine can survive is if Zelenskyy sued for peace and the US and NATO stopped sending military aid to Ukraine and prolonging the inevitable.
    1
  17131.  @MarkYeung1  "The United States provided $25 million dollars of military aids to China in 1940 and $125 million dollars of land lease funds in 1941," That US military aid was largely pocketed by the Kuomintang. KMT officials had hoarded the material, armament and military-aid funding provided by the US. It had gotten so bad that even US President Truman made a remark about the hoarding and wrote that the "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", having taken $750 million in US aid. "44 million Ukrainians are grateful that USA and other countries are providing military aids so that Ukrainians can fight for their survival." The longer the conflict in Ukraine is prolonged, the more territory Ukraine loses (i.e Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporiza, etc) until there may not even be a Ukraine existence at the end of the SMO. The only way Ukraine can survive is if Zelenskyy sued for peace and the US and NATO stopped sending military aid to Ukraine and prolonging the inevitable.
    1
  17132.  @MarkYeung1  That money provided by the US largely went into the pockets of the Kuomintang. KMT officials had hoarded the material, armament and military-aid funding provided by the US. It had gotten so bad that even US President Truman made a remark about the it and wrote that the "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", having taken $750 million in US aid. "44 million Ukrainians are grateful that USA and other countries are providing military aids so that Ukrainians can fight for their survival." The longer the conflict in Ukraine is prolonged, the more territory Ukraine loses (i.e Crimea, Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporiza, etc) until there may not even be a Ukraine existence at the end of the SMO. The only way Ukraine can survive is if Zelenskyy sued for peace and the US and NATO stopped sending military aid to Ukraine and prolonging the inevitable.
    1
  17133.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "The United States provided $25 million dollars of military aids to China in 1940 and $125 million dollars of land lease funds in 1941," That money provided by the US largely went into the pockets of the Kuomintang. KMT officials had hoarded the material, armament and military aid funding provided by the US. It had gotten so bad that even US President Truman made a remark about the it and wrote that the "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", having taken $750 million in US aid.
    1
  17134. +Willard Lentz Its still a business deal agreed upon by both parties. The quality of our products depends on the amount of money Americans are willing to fork out. What they pay is what they get, so don't blame China if the quality is not up to American's standards. But since demand for Chinese goods is still at all time high, it can be said that China's products are of reasonable quality for the price, in order to maintain the demand.
    1
  17135.  @rais1953  I found that survey you are referring to. In the survey of 1,094 respondents, although 55% thought the AUKUS arrangement would further inflame relations with China, 62% believed Australia was correct to pursue the nuclear submarine deal with the US and the UK, while 54% agreed with the statement: “The Aukus partnership is in Australia’s best security and economic interests.” So overall, even though they are concerned with worsening relations with China, there is still support for AUKUS among Australians according to that poll.
    1
  17136. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17137. Even the U.S acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17138. United States: "We will not be sending officials to the Beijing Olympics!" Other 5 Eyes countries: : "Us too!" United States: "Just kidding, we will be sending at least 18 officials to attend the games in Beijing." Other 5 Eyes countries: : "Wait... what? Why'd we jump on the boycott bandwagon? How do we explain our stance to Beijing now?"
    1
  17139. In fact, Xi Jinping had once addressed Joe Biden as "my old friend" (in Chinese) according to an interpreter during a 2021 virtual meeting between the two leaders. But Joe Biden pushed back against this expression.
    1
  17140.  @dennisp8520  Battery technology will improve as time goes by. Better capacity, shorter charging times, lesser problems. Scientists are constantly working around the clock to improve the performance of today's batteries. Furthermore, it is renewable. But gasoline and other fossil fuels? The Earth will eventually run out of fossil fuels one day in the future, so what's the point of having gasoline cars? Sure, you have faster refuelling times, but what happens when the Earth's fuel deposits are finally depleted? All the advantages of fossil fuels will be disregarded when the reserves dries up and there is zero fossil fuel. So why not invest in renewable green energy then?
    1
  17141.  @dennisp8520  Current Battery technology isn't fully renewable yes, but scientists are working to extend battery life, and also attempting to recycle battery components and materials. Maybe one day in the future, batteries would become fully recyclable and renewable. Once again, combustible sources from fossil fuels would eventually run out one day. Even the Earth's natural gas reserves are limited, and once they run out, where are we going to get our sources? You said "If something is drastically inferior it can't succeed, especially when it's also more expensive." The difference in levels of technology can slowly be breached over time, and cost is merely a factor of economics. I mean, won't fuel prices rise significantly as the Earth's reserves starts getting depleted too? And what happens when fossil fuels finally run out one day? All the money in the world won't buy you fuel once its source has been depleted. I agree that Nuclear Fuel is possibly the best solution thus far, but Nuclear Fission energy comes with its own set of complications. The best source would probably be Nuclear Fusion and scientists all over the world are working on creating stable Nuclear Fusion reactors.
    1
  17142.  @dennisp8520  You're talking about steam combustion? What fuel is used to heat the water to become steam? It's fossil fuels right? Otherwise, how to extract energy from steam without input of energy first? And simply claiming "we won't be running out of fossil fuel for X amount of years" is merely postponing the issue that's all. Sooner or later, the issue will arrive on our doorsteps, so instead of waiting for that day to come, why not prepare our technology ahead of time? For example, China has the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam, to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and produce green energy to fuel our growth. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtube.com/watch?v=b8cCsUBYSkwnd
    1
  17143. TheGolfdaily If you think people really died at Tiananmen square, then its up to you to believe what you want. Why don't you name the exact death toll figure if that is what you believe? As for students being run over by tanks, how stupid do you think these students are? They are presumably able-bodied at their age, to be able to sidestep from a moving tank, (especially since tanks' engines can be heard from very far away) so why you presume that they will run over willingly? They obviously know that they don't stand a chance against a tank, (especially when they are unarmed) so if they stand still and expect to survive being run over, then they are courting death by doing so. Regarding Tiananmen Square location itself, according to Jay Mathews, former Beijing bureau chief for the Washington Post said "as far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square". He goes on to conclude: A few people may have been killed by random shooting on streets near the square, but all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. Hundreds of people, most of them workers and passersby, did die that night, but in a different place and under different circumstances. Since you want to compare Mongols with Chinese, and Britain with India, Pakistan, Afghanistan etc, then let me ask you this question. Did the Indians, Pakistanis, Afghan people, etc, suddenly became British? Since you claim that Chinese became Mongols? Who can define what is meant by nobility? Western society was built upon the backs of African slavery, genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, occupation of their lands, and brutal colonization of India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, etc. and plundering of resources like gold from Asia and Africa. Westerners may be rich, but it is not obtained by noble means. Who's blood, sacrifice and sweat is being used to build Western society here? China does not consider itself the only nation on the planet, but why don't you test some Westerners like Americans on how much they know about world geography? Why don't you ask whether Americans whether they consider themselves the center of the world or not? Yet you accuse Chinese people of acting like a spolit 7-year old brat? Would China be where it is today, if everyone acted like a spoilt brat, instead of working to lift China out of poverty? Also, what about your claim that Lee Kuan Yew didn't oppress the freedom of individuals in his country? Besides Amos Yee, there is another Singapore dissident, Francis Seow who was a Singaporean-born American writer, political dissident who lived in exile from Singapore after facing lawsuits from Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore's first Prime Minister.
    1
  17144. +TheGolfdaily You didn't mention anything about Western industrialization, only "early adoption of Western advances in modern thinking" Also, 250 years ago, Japan was still in the middle of the Tokugawa shogunate rule (Edo period) and Japan only opened up to the West around the Meiji Restoration period, and it was still under Imperial dictatorship under Emperor Meiji, If the West truly cared, then why did they give Shandong Province to Japan (which had been captured by Germans after WW1) instead of returning it to China? The West pressured Japan out of Geneva Convention, but that only meant Japan was "free" to commit horrible atrocities outside of the convention, such as the Rape of Nanjing, Unit 731 experiments and forcing "comfort" women to service Japanese soldiers. Even today, South Korean "comfort" women are protesting outside Japanese embassy. As far as I know, USA only cut off oil to Japan around 1941, prior to that, Japan had already invaded Manchuria since 1931 and occupied it for 10 years prior to USA imposing its oil embargo. USA was the world's largest supplier of oil (even Japan wanted it) at that time, yet you claim they couldn't send aid? Hitler and Nazi Germany invaded Poland at the start of WW2 in 1939, which was 8 years later than the Japanese invasion of Manchuria. Trouble was brewing in Germany yes, but in Asia, China and Japan were already at war. In truth, every country cares for itself, and USA is no exception, and likewise, China is no exception here. Nobody cares for China, except Chinese. Nobody can defend China from invaders, except Chinese. Nobody wants to see China succeed, except for Chinese. People like you claim to have China's interest in mind, but it is apparent that you don't and you truly do not want to see a powerful China. For example, China appears to be following good examples of dictatorship, like Lee Kuan Yew of Singapore. Like I mentioned earlier, Singapore’s political environment is stifling and citizens continue to face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, etc, etc. so why are you accusing China of following a wrong example of dictatorship? Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when Mongolians conquered it and incorporate it as part of Yuan dynasty China. Tibet was part of China right up to 1912 and was incorporated back in 1951, so why should China free it?
    1
  17145. TheGolfdaily Similarly, I also wish well for China, and for China to follow our own unique path, instead of just blindly copying Western democracy, just for the sake of it. Nobody says every country has to follow Western democracy to be successful, and China is living proof of that. China survived 5000 years of history without adopting democracy, so why is there a sudden need to adopt it? As for human rights in China, Chinese people have access to food, housing, education, basic healthcare, modern amenities like smartphone, computers, WiFi, Internet, etc. and can travel overseas to visit other countries (Every country knows of Chinese tourists in their lands) so exactly how bad is Chinese human rights, if people are appear to be happy with the current level? China maybe under a dictatorship, but the communist party has shown remarkable level of pragmatism and flexibility. For example, in 1970s, Deng Xiaoping introduced capitalist economic reforms, because the communist market system just wasn't working out under Mao Zedong. For decades, China also had One-Child Policy, meaning Chinese families restricted to having only 1 child per couple, but in 2016, China now has a Two-Child Policy. The government has even shown that it is willing to make amends to the party's constitution, showing its flexibility in adapting to changes. On the other hand, countries like United States appear to be suffering from "political stagnation". The loose gun laws in USA have long been controversial topic, but apparently, US citizens are unwilling to surrender their right to bear firearms, despite periodic instances of mass shootings by gunmen, including the most recent one in Florida. This is just my personal opinion that's all, and its up to Americans what they wish to do in their country.
    1
  17146. TheGolfdaily China was once democratic, when Dr.Sun Yatsen overthrew the Manchu government in 1912 and established the Republic of China. How was that 250 years ago? Did Japan invade China 250 years ago? Japan did invade Korea (when it was tributary state of China) in late 1500s by Toyotomi Hideyoshi, but they withdrew from China in the end. When Sun established ROC under the Kuomintang (Nationalists), China was divided into various provinces and each ruled by individual warlords (even Tibet broke free of Chinese rule). As for Japan, it first began modernising during Meiji Restoration, under Emperor Meiji, which was how such small nation became powerful, despite being a dictatorship at that time. During WW1 and WW2, Imperial Japan was dictatorship, under Emperor Hirohito, whereas ROC was democratic under KMT, but divided into many states. This was how Japan was able to invade China, because China was democratic, but divided, whereas Imperial Japan was dictatorship but united, and no longer under the old shogunate system. Why you claim I don't read history books? How does claim Japan invaded China with 5000 years of history, help support your point about emperor and democracy here? The West did not care about multiple Japanese invasions of China. During WW1, Dr. Sun requested help from the West, but Westerners laughed at the notion of China adopting democracy. The Allies even gave away the province of Shandong (which been captured by Germans) to Japan, instead of back to China, even when China was part of the Allies. Dr. Sun died without seeing a unified China. China also been fighting Japanese since 1931, which was 8 years before Hitler invaded Poland at start of WW2. The West was content to let Japan claim more and more Chinese territories and lies, until Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, finally spurring USA into the war. USA only fought Japan for 3 years (1942-1945) with China's help too, whereas China been fighting Japan for 11 years (since 1931) without US/Western help. The West has never been China's friend, and USA only fought because Pearl Harbor was bombed. Why are you acting like USA has been acting in China's interests during WW2?
    1
  17147. TheGolfdaily Modern China was built by sweat, blood, toil and sacrifice of Chinese people to turn it from 3rd world country to 1st world, so why do you claim China is oppressing the population? Lee Kuan Yew was also harsh against his critics, and Singaporeans can be jailed for criticizing him. Look at Singaporean critic Amos Yee, who is being sentenced to jail for speaking out against Lee Kuan Yew. During his time, Lee Kuan Yew did not tolerate dissidents and banished them from Singapore, and even after his death, there appears little chance of dissidents being allowed to return to Singapore. Source:No sign of welcome home for Singapore's dissidents cnbc.com/2015/03/27/after-lee-no-sign-of-welcome-home-for-singapores-dissidents.html So what makes you think Lee Kuan Yew didn't oppress the freedom of individuals? Didn't he control the media and use force to get his way too? But look at how much Singapore prospered from the little fishing village that it once was? If you look at 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, the protestors idealistic students who were anti-Deng (Deng Xiaoping was the one who introduced capitalist reforms to replace China's communist market) and what would have happened if Deng stepped down? Would China be as prosperous as it is today? Why don't you take a good hard look at the issue, instead of blindly following Western propaganda? The Mongols once ruled China 800 years ago, but it was Kublai Khan, grandson of Genghis Khan, that decide to abandon his Mongolian culture and proclaim himself emperor of Yuan dynasty China. The Mongols knew next to nothing about governing a country as big as China. They were nomadic horsemen, so who grows the food necessary to feed the empire? They live in temporary houses called Yurt, so who is going to plan the towns and routes? They know nothing of bureaucracy, so who keeps the empire running smoothly? Han Chinese farmers, workers, scholars, accountants, and bureaucrats were the ones running the empire, not the Mongols. Exactly who is behaving like a spoilt kid here? Who is discussing real historical events in a calm and sensible manner, using logic and examples to back up points, and who is making broad, sweeping statements without showing any understanding of the issue at hand? I don't mock or insult you for your views, so why are you resorting to attacking me personally instead of my points?
    1
  17148. +TheGolfdaily I merely answered your question of "How many different opposing Political parties are there in China" that's all. If you complain that mainland China is "single party" then ROC (Taiwan) has been for almost its entire life by authoritarian, single-party government, (KMT). Only in 2016, did another political party (DPP) took over KMT. Taiwan had been under martial law for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time, but Taiwan progressed immensely during this period of authoritarian KMT rule. Similarly, South Korea had the dictator, Park Chung Hee, who help bring modernize South Korea from who served as the President of South Korea from 1963 to 1979. Park has been ranked by the public as the greatest South Korean president but he still remains a controversial figure for his dictatorship. But would South Korea have prospered if not for Park? In the same way, Singapore been ruled its entire life by authoritarian, single-party government (PAP) for over 50 years. According to Human Rights Watch ( hrw.org/asia/singapore ) "Singapore’s political environment is stifling. Citizens continue to face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad legal provisions on security, public order, morality, and racial and religious harmony. The government silences and punishes critics by using defamation laws and the archaic offense of “scandalizing the judiciary.” The media are regularly censored, particularly for discussions of domestic politics" Singapore's political environment sounds similar to China right? But both Singapore (under PAP), ROC (under KMT) and PRC (under CPC) progressed rapidly under this authoritarian single-party system, so if the system works for China, then why is there a sudden need to adopt democracy? Because people like you say so?
    1
  17149. TheGolfDaily China has about 8 opposing political parties and they are: 1. The Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang (中国国民党革命委员会) 2. China Democratic League (中国民主同盟) 3. China Democratic National Construction Association (中国民主建国会) 4. China Association for Promoting Democracy (中国民主促进会) 5. Chinese Peasants' and Workers' Democratic Party (中国农工民主党) 6. China Zhi Gong Party (中国致公党) 7. Jiusan Society (九三学社) 8. Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League (台湾民主自治同盟)
    1
  17150. TheGolfDaily When did I ever said "people really died at Nanjing by the Japanese Imperial Army"? Can you quote me the exact words I used claiming that I said such thing? There were also older folk and young children at Nanjing, so why you presume they were all able-bodied? Did everyone in Nanjing had weapons to fight against even foot soldiers? When did I presume Japan has massacred all those innocent people? Can you quote the words I used claiming that Japan has massacred all those innocent people? In 2003, Zhang Lianhong, professor of Nanjing Massacre Research Center in Nanjing Normal University, published an article in Beijing Daily, in which he used historical fact to show that the population of Nanjing urban area was between 367,000 and 467,000, and the overall Nanjing population was between 535,000 and 635,000 to refute the 200,000 population claim. Source:Data Challenges Japanese Theory on Nanjing Population Size china.org.cn/english/2003/Dec/83437.htm There were many testimonies by foreigners living in Nanjing that the Japanese committed mass rape. Here is a documentary where narrate the events of Nanjing through foreigner accounts. Video:'Nanking' with Woody Harrelson - Full Movie youtube.com/watch?v=jfkk-GtM_sI
    1
  17151. TheGolfdaily Since you know Rape of Nanjing is real, then why are you asking me for evidence of it then? During Rape of Nanjing, Japanese soldiers went from door to door, searching for girls, with many women being captured and gang raped, filling the city with naked bodies, sometimes mutilated with their private parts stabbed with bayonets or sharp pieces of bamboo. Pregnant women were not exempted from rape and murder, and after being raped, their swollen bellies were stabbed and the fetus exposed. Young children and elderly folk were also not spared, and if the children were too small, the Japanese soldiers cut them open in order to rape them. What crime has China committed then that equals to that of Japanese soldiers? According to Chinese laws, unlawful assembly will be met with force so what is this "crime" that China broke you tell me? Did Chinese government resort to rape like what Japanese soldiers did? Long ago, when China first discovered Japan, it was a starving, tribal society, so Chinese people taught Japanese how to grow rice to feed themselves, how to cultivate silk to cloth themselves, and even how to read and write Chinese characters. China did not invade Japan (although Mongols tried but failed) but Japan repaid China by invading our lands, stealing our territories, killing our men and raping our women.
    1
  17152. TheGolfdaily Why don't you provide some actual evidence of the massacre at Tiananmen Square, instead of claiming Chinese deny own history? That's what I asked you since a few comments ago isn't it? According to this source, Over the last decade, many American reporters and editors have accepted a mythical version of that warm, bloody night. They repeated it often before and during Clinton’s trip. On the day the president arrived in Beijing, a Baltimore Sun headline (June 27, page 1A) referred to “Tiananmen, where Chinese students died.” A USA Today article (June 26, page 7A) called Tiananmen the place “where pro-democracy demonstrators were gunned down.” The Wall Street Journal (June 26, page A10) described “the Tiananmen Square massacre” where armed troops ordered to clear demonstrators from the square killed “hundreds or more.” The New York Post (June 25, page 22) said the square was “the site of the student slaughter.” The problem is this: as far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square. Source:The Myth of Tiananmen cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php So why are you talking about a massacre in Tiananmen Square? Its obvious that you don't respect what I said (despite claiming to) when I asked for how many people you think died at Tiananmen Square, and you mirror my questions with the Rape of Nanjing instead.
    1
  17153. TheGolfdaily So how many people died at Tiananmen Square itself then? You video does not show how many people died at Tiananmen Square, unlike you keep saying. It just shows bloody pictures which could easily be anywhere in the world, instead of Tiananmen. Also, you said previously that Lee Kuan Yew didn't oppress the freedom of individuals in his country? Then what about LKY dissidents like, Francis Seow who been banished from the country? So far, this exchange is just nothing but you constantly thinking imposing your thinking onto China and Chinese people that's all, calling us spoilt 7-year old brats. After the 1989 protests, there have been no other major democracy movement in China, so what makes you think it will be our future? The Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, and many people though China will follow suit, but China is still going strong even today. thanks to strong central government. Like I said previously, countries like PRC, Singapore, ROC, etc all progressed rapidly under authoritarian single party goverments, of CPC (PRC), PAP (Singapore) and KMT (ROC) so aren't they examples of alternative forms of governments that have met with success? China should follow our own path to success and adopt a government system best suited to our country, instead of blindly following the West, just because of the preconceived notion that Western form of government is the best. Why don't you wake up to reality today, instead of listening to Western propaganda? Western anti-communist propaganda will stop at nothing to portray communism in negative light consistently.
    1
  17154. TheGolfdaily At the beginning, all I did was answer your question of "Just tell me, How many different opposing Political parties are there in China???" You did thanked me (your welcome) and later claim that you are not trying to dictate China and you are spending your time having exchange with people because you wish well for China and not the opposite. But it is clear that this exchange hasn't been about you wishing well for China, only to impose your view onto Chinese people, and claiming we behave like a spoilt 7 year old kid ("Grow the hell Up!," you said previously) So how exactly are you even respecting other people's viewpoints here? I don't resort to insulting you, simply because your views differ from mine, I even ask you reasonable questions, like "Why you think Lee Kwan Yew didn't oppress the freedom of individuals in his country?" but all you done is ignore them, and continued to hate on China ("Free Tibet!" you said). Today Tibet is recognized as an autonomous region of China, by United Nations countries like USA, Russia, France, India, UK, Germany, etc, since nobody brings up the issue of Tibetan sovereignty with Beijing during all those UN summits/meetings. When you draw the map of PRC, Tibet is clearly included as part of China. Why don't you read up on the previously discussed issues and form your own opinion, rather than just blindly follow Western propaganda? Why not look at issues from multiple angles, instead of labeling other people as spoilt 7-year olds? 鸟儿唱歌不是因为他们有了答案，而是因为它们有歌要唱。 A bird does not sing because it has an answer. It sings because it has a song.
    1
  17155. Just like Nicki Minaj tweet about Covid-19 vaccine side-effect affecting her as-of-yet unidentified cousin's friend in Trinidad, and garnering widespread support from anti-vaxxers, until even the WHO had to issue a statement against her.
    1
  17156. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17157.  @roshannashor3045  当年日本也逐渐变成了发达国家，经济一度还要超过美国，西方媒体也没有这么报道过日本。（美国媒体确实渲染过日本的经济威胁，但是绝没有这么系统地妖魔化过日本。而日本在西欧媒体中的描述一致都非常好。）中国的意识形态和政治体制，在西方看来就是“邪恶”的。西方的学界、媒体界、政界，已经在批苏联的过程中形成了一套对批判这种政治体制和意识形态的系统性的叙事，并且谁不按照这个叙事讲话，谁就是『助纣为虐』，就是『邪恶的』，就会职业性、社会性地死亡。
    1
  17158. Or burnt as kindling for Europeans who did not agree to buy Russian gas with rubles.
    1
  17159.  @rusty1491  Why will I get flagged as hate speech?
    1
  17160.  @Blessedone333AZ  Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending coin on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands.
    1
  17161. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17162. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17163. ALLAHbless RUSSIA China have many historical monuments still standing today, like Great Wall of China, The Forbidden City, the Tomb of 1st Emperor of China and his terracotta army, the Grand Canal. According to UNESCO, China ranks 2nd in the world, in the number of world heritage sites at 52, only behind Italy/Rome at number 1 with 53 sites.
    1
  17164. A recent survey for kids showed: Most Chinese kids' dream: Astronaut Most American kids' dream: YouTuber Source: nextshark.com/survey-youtube-stars-astronauts/
    1
  17165. +Ranvir Singh Regarding Chinese "ghost cities", China still has millions of people in countryside, and every year about 100,000 people from rural areas shift into urban areas to fill up these apartments in cities. But of course, this is not immediately and such cities will take time to fill up completely. One example is Zhengzhou in Henan province, China's largest ghost city in 2011, but today has population of 9,378,000 inhabitants. Source: Zhengzhou Ghost City Alive! newgeography.com/content/002159-zhengzhou-ghost-city-alive Source: 5 Chinese Ghost Cities that Came Alive vagabondjourney.com/5-chinese-ghost-cities-came-alive/
    1
  17166. I don't understand why you claim Chinese people are dog eaters so they won't win against India. What is the logic here?
    1
  17167. +Mudit Singh Are you perhaps referring to Indians then? Look at how many Indians barking here without anything substantial.
    1
  17168. Chinese people in the video have already expressed their own opinion to the reporter. They don't find that Xi Jinping is becoming too powerful, but the reporter keeps digging for the answer he wants to hear that's all.
    1
  17169. China had sent Spain a list of approved Chinese suppliers to buy from, but Spain choose to buy from unapproved company, Bioeasy, l which wasn't on the list of approved suppliers, so it wasn't China's fault that Spain choose to buy from unapproved companies.
    1
  17170.  @koreanmarco  Here's a short 2-min video of the beautiful night view of 11 Chinese cities in China Video: 中国大陆11座城市美丽夜景_Beautiful Night View of 11 Chinese cities in 2 Minutes_ youtu.be/mzR8Scsd33g (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  17171.  @koreanmarco  Have you been to China? Our capital, Beijing is popular tourist destination famous for ancient monuments like The Great Wall of China, Forbidden City, Summer Palace, Temple of Heaven, as well as modern architecture like National Stadium, National Centre for the Performing Arts, CCTV Headquarters, Galaxy SOHO and so on. Here's a short 4-min video of Beijing. Video: A Glance at Beijing 坐标北京 youtu.be/-UuJxmU6OCQ (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  17172.  @崔小非  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17173. If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  17174.  Damian609  But why do you think The People can somehow govern the country? Why involve ordinary citizens in elections? Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (e.g. they refuse to turn up to vote) or they may make decisions based on emotions instead of logic (e.g. The British don't like immigrants so they vote for Britain to exit the EU) Or they may simply lack political awareness to make important decisions regarding the country's future, and they may be susceptible to foreign influence in casting votes. Why not let the people who know how to govern, govern?
    1
  17175.  Damian609  Then what is USA doing about corruption? Corruption is universal phenomena and all countries suffer from corruption to a certain degree. At least under Chinese government there are ongoing anti-corruption campaigns under President Xi Jinping, but when is the last time USA had an anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hilary Clinton is corruption politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his presidential campaign. But after he became president, no further action being taken against Clinton for corruption.
    1
  17176.  Damian609  Where is your evidence that President Xi is corrupt? President Xi's anti-corruption campaign even extends overseas to catch corrupt Chinese officials who have fled the mainland. Source: Sydney-based former bank chief Lai Mingmin surrenders to China's anti-corruption drive abc.net.au/news/2018-06-23/chinese-man-surrenders-to-chinas-anti-corruption-drive/9902268 Since President Xi Jinping has shown to be strong and capable of governing a country of 1.4 billion (certainly not an easy feat) then personally I see nothing wrong with leaving him in power to maximise the benefits to China. Strong, competent leaders are hard to come as it is, and it would be a shame for them to step down because of term limits.
    1
  17177.  Damian609  You're clearly unable to refute my points about long term leadership, that's why you labelled my points bs and resorted to calling me brainwashed. The United States clearly lacks a long term strategy against China, and America's woes like rising debt and healthcare costs and much too big to be solved by any American president in just 4-8 years! I mean, where does America see itself in 10 years time? How about 20 years time?
    1
  17178. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  17179.  @GSP-76  From what I understand, semiconductor fabrication requires copious amounts of water. During a period of drought in Taiwan, TMSC's wafer fabs took a hit to their production. Yet strangely, the US is relocating TMSC wafer fabs to arid Arizona. A desert of all places.
    1
  17180.  @GSP-76  TSMC deserves credit where credit is due for their breakthroughs in manufacturing chips. But I've also heard talk that after 2 nm chips arrive around 2025, scientists believe we may be approaching the limit of just how small chips can be made. There's a supposed theoretical limit to the number of transistors that can be packed onto a wafer, when approaching 1 nm and below, and it is believed that Moore's Law (i.e the number of transistors on a chip will double every year) will be broken if scientists are unable to surpass this limit.
    1
  17181.  @Music4567able  There's merit to what you suggest, but also bad things as well. Signing a contract doesn't automatically mean that overseas students will fulfil their end of the bargain, there are numerous examples of Chinese studying abroad who choose to renegade on their scholarships and refuse to return to China after completing their studies. Then China's response is forbid these renegade scholars from ever setting foot in China, but in the process denying our country access to the foreign knowledge these students gleamed overseas. Your second suggestion of diverting resources from scholarships to R&D also has merit. However, by doing so China runs the risk of "closing up our country" if we stop learning about the West completely. That's one of the problems plaguing the USA education system. Many Chinese students know about America from overseas studies, however, many American students hardly know anything outside of America.
    1
  17182.  @Music4567able  There's still exists the possibility of overseas students breaking their scholarship bond and choosing not to return to China after completing their studies. Then, there's the fact that China's response is to ban these scholars from returning to China, which only shuts China off from the knowhow that these students learned in the US. Increasing domestic R&D spending in China is a good idea too, I agree. But however, just throwing money at R&D alone isn't going to cut it. Our research centres require foreign talent (such as returning overseas students) to teach our local scientists and researchers how to go about performing R&D, and how to improve the quality of our research. Alternatively, the government could invest more money into attracting foreign talent to set up research centres in China.
    1
  17183. The thing is that mainlanders make up the majority of revenue income for Cathay Pacific, yet the cabin crew treat mainlanders the worst.
    1
  17184. @Ben Shen What makes you think Chinese learning potential is being held back? The Chinese government is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending and catching up fast to the United States. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($451.9 billion) <-- 3. European Union ($379.0 billion) 4. Japan ($165.7 billion) 5. Germany ($118.8 billion) 6. South Korea ($91.6 billion) In the West, researchers offend have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    1
  17185. Taiwan island inalienable part of China.
    1
  17186. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17187. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17188. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  17189. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17190. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17191. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, if you read their constitution.
    1
  17192. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17193.  @shmuelba1  About half of Jewish people around the world today identify as Ashkenazi, meaning that they descend from Jews who lived in Central or Eastern Europe. Most of the Jews in Israel belong to such a group and all of them have at least two passports, one for Israel and one from their country of origin, be it USA, Russia, Ukraine, UK, Canada, etc.
    1
  17194.  @shmuelba1  About half of Jewish people around the world today identify as having descended from Jews who lived in Central or Eastern Europe. In fact, the majority of the Jews in Israel belong to such a group, and all of them have at least two passports, one for Israel and one from their country of origin, be it USA, Russia, Ukraine, UK, Canada, etc. Even you said earlier that the Jews immigrated to Israel during the British Mandate.
    1
  17195.  @shmuelba1  Judaism is a religion. About half of all Jewish people around the world today identify as having descended from Jews who lived in Central or Eastern Europe, which means they aren't native to Palestine lands. Even you said earlier that the Jews immigrated to Israel during the British Mandate.
    1
  17196.  @shmuelba1  Judaism is a religion. About half of all Jewish people around the world today identify as having descended from Jews who lived in Central or Eastern Europe.
    1
  17197.  @credenza1  You mentioned rape (a serious allegation indeed) but do you have any evidence of this? Why haven't any victims or witnesses come forth and testify against Hamas? In fact, many of the hostages released reported being well treated by Hamas.
    1
  17198.  @martinjerald6000  "If Hamas is as concerned as you are, it will release all the hostages to end the sufferings of gazans" Hamas is willing to release hostages if Netanyahu would agree to extend the ceasefire. However, Netanyahu doesn't seem to care about the lives of the hostages, and he has resumed the indiscriminate targeting of civilian hospitals, refugee camps and schools.
    1
  17199.  @credenza1  You mentioned rape (a serious allegation indeed) but do you have any evidence of this? Why haven't any victims or witnesses come forth and testify against Hamas?
    1
  17200.  @credenza1  You mentioned rape (a serious allegation indeed) but do you have any evidence of this?
    1
  17201.  @credenza1  You mentioned rape (a serious allegation indeed) but why haven't any victims or witnesses come forth and testify against Hamas?
    1
  17202. @HKZ P "@神州 Shenzhou Where is the data that Taiwan was included in the numbers?" According to the following source: According to reports from Taiwan's CTnews, the number of visits by Taiwan residents to the Chinese mainland from January to October in 2018 increased by more than 220,000 compared to the same period in 2017, and Chinese mainland has seen more than 4 million trips by Taiwan residents for the first time in 2018. It is thought that this number will continue to grow in 2019. A survey conducted by the Taiwan's transportation department shows that Taiwan's outbound tourism from January to October 2018 increased in general compared to the same period in 2017. Among the most popular places for this outbound tourism was Chinese mainland. In total, from January to October 2018, more than 3.52 million trips were made by Taiwan residents to the mainland, which is an increase of 6.85 percent over 2017. Although it is important to note that this figure incoporates people making multiple trips over the period. It had been estimated by Taiwan's tourism industry that the number of trips made by Taiwan residents to the mainland in 2018 would breakthrough the psycholologically important 4 million number for the first time. Chinese mainland sees 4 million visits by Taiwan residents in 2018 ecns.cn/news/society/2019-01-03/detail-ifzcitha9949844.shtml
    1
  17203. @HKZ P "@神州 Shenzhou Great! Oppressive fascism in space." What's wrong with space exploration? China has even launched spacestations of our own into orbit! Tiangong-1 天宫-1 was China's first prototype space station launched in 2011, followed by Tiangong-2 in 2016. There was even a "space lecture" where Chinese taikonaut conducted a lecture while in onboard Tiangong-1 directly to her students on the ground below, demonstrating simple low-gravity experiments in space. Video: Chinese teacher in space gives lecture directly to her students on the ground youtube.com/watch?v=OUAuZnpoZ58 We are showing our kids and future generations of Chinese, that China is a modern space nation, capable of achieving equally impressive feats as Westerners. China is the 3rd country in the world to launch space stations into orbit, besides USA and USSR. China is also the 1st in Asia to achieve such a feat, and even Japan, Korea, India, Singapore (and even Taiwan) have not launched spacestations of their own into orbit.
    1
  17204. @HKZ P I've given you Taiwan tourists to mainland statistics, so now you have nothing more to say about it? You can't refute my points so you resort to taking potshots at China? "@神州 Shenzhou Your public school system is atrocious." China has also become a top destination for international students. As of 2013, China is the most popular country in Asia for international students, surpassing Japan, Korea, and Singapore, and China ranks 3rd overall among countries for international students destinations. China, Australia, the United Kingdom, Germany and France all attract more than 100,000 international students each year, according to Institute of International Education data. China continues to be the most popular destination in the region, though, ranking third among countries that host the most international students, IIE reports. Source: Explore the World's Top Universities usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/2013/10/08/explore-the-worlds-top-universities
    1
  17205. @HKZ P China is also home to two of the world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway TaihuLight 神威·太湖之光 and Tianhe-2 天河-2. In the 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, as compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source: China outguns US in top supercomputer showdown zdnet.com/article/now-china-outguns-us-in-top-supercomputer-showdown/
    1
  17206. @HKZ P I have already shown you the link from Taiwan's CT News, a survey by Taiwan's transportation department, as well as quoted World Tourism Rankings, in my previous comments. What more do you want? You demand evidence, yet act blind when presented with the truth? As for China's education system, according to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is impressive, considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining a literacy rate of 96.4%. Source: Adult literacy rate in China from 1982 to 2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china/ If you combine this with the fact that China is ranked 3rd most popular destination in the world for international student, then I would claim China's education system, while not perfect, is among the most efficient in the world, to be able to achieve 96.4% literacy in just 30 years with the world's most populous country.
    1
  17207. @HKZ P Did you know China is also home to the world's longest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail? In the past, during Chinese New Year, people in China would travel to our home province to be with our families and the journey used to take several days. But with hi-speed rail, the commuting time has been reduced from days to mere hours! Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines Our trains are world class, the journeys are smooth and efficient. You can even balance small objects like a coin, stationery, a smartphone, an inverted water bottle near the window of a train traveling at 350 kph, and they would remain undisturbed for a long period. Here is one such video: Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE
    1
  17208. @HKZ P I've already shown you the links about Taiwan tourists to the mainland, yet you choose to ignore them, even when its right in front of you. And what difference does it make? Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan tourists are still visiting the mainland, so why are you reiterating the same, stale point? "@神州 Shenzhou Does your propaganda about adult literacy rates include the 200 - 600 million unregistered people?" Your video source is dated to 2011 which is 8 years ago, so its not necessarily the 200 - 600 million unregistered people is exact. Can you provide a more recent source? "@神州 Shenzhou Yes. The trains on the east coast are nice. I have been on them. Too bad you can't use them if you are poor or your social credit score isn't high enough." China's high-speed rail has been heavily subsidized by the government so that its fares are as low as possible for poor people. As for those with low social credit scores, don't foreigners often complain about how Chinese people are rude, noisy, misbehave in public, refuse to give up seats, jaywalk and so on? Not all Chinese people are like that, and with the social credit system, people are penalized on their bad behavior, but if they persist until their score becomes unacceptable, then they will be barred from public transport, or from purchasing plane tickets to fly to other countries and make nuisance of themselves overseas. At least until their score improves.
    1
  17209. @HKZ P "@神州 Shenzhou None of this changes the fact that Taiwan, Tibet, Eastern Turkmenistan and Hong Kong don't want the CCP running their country." Didn't the people of Taiwan voted against the pro-independence DPP in the latest Taiwan midterm elections? The DPP suffered major defeat at the polls, losing 2 important posts to the KMT opposition, and even the pro-independence Taiwan President Tsai herself resigned, after this humiliating defeat. So doesn't this imply that majority of Taiwan people don't want independence? Given that they voted against Tsai. As for Tibet, the lives of many Tibetans have steadily improved under CCP rule. Back when Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves, and the remaining 5% were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil was infertile, receiving little rainfall, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the population. Starvation and crime was commonplace, stealing was punished by amputation of limbs and even skinning. There's even this Tibetan drum called damaru that is made from human skulls, with drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. But since 1951, under CCP rule, Tibet has modernized when Chinese workers built infrastructure like roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity. Tibetans were introduced to modern technology like cars, smartphones, computers, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from TaoBao) and so on. The first Tibetan universities opened in Lhasa after 1951 and Chinese workers built hydroelectric powerstations to harness green energy to power Tibetan cities. Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through difficult terrain and low oxygen environment, to connect the normally isolated Tibet to the rest of the world. Tibetans can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibetan tourist industry has even sprung up. Sources: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Therefore, I would say most Tibetans are happy to be under CCP rule. From what I described above.
    1
  17210. @HKZ P Besides space stations, China also launched the world's first quantum satellite Micius 墨子 in 2016, which are supposedly unhackable, due to quantum encryption, and have also proven that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere, and smashing the previous record held on the ground Video: Quantum satellite achieves 'spooky action' at record distance youtube.com/watch?v=4QlcKuxDGrs Quantum Entanglement (in a nutshell) is when two subatomic particles become "entangled" and gain the ability to influence each other's "quantum states" (won't go into detail what it is), seemingly regardless of the distance involved. One particle could be located on the surface of the Earth, and the other on the surface of the Moon, and theoretically, they can still influence each other's quantum states. The previous record for the longest distance of Quantum Entanglement on Earth was 143 km in an experiment carried out in the Canary Islands. But China has broken that record and allowed two stations, Lijiang and Delinghua stations, located 1200 km apart from each other to communicate, through quantum satellite.
    1
  17211. @HKZ P "@神州 Shenzhou. CCP rule is definitely not better than self rule. No matter how much you wish it to be so. You are a brainwashed CCP troll." I have given evidence to support my claims, whereas all you done is ignore evidence or selectively recognize them when necessary. You complain about me cherry picking, when you yourself do the same thing? Where exactly does it say "Taiwanese visiting the mainland were counted as foreign visitors"? And I have given my thoughts about Tibet, cited evidence and provided reasons why many Tibetans support the CCP rulership. You can't refute my points so you start attacking my "attitude" instead of attacking my points about Tibet? Look at how much Lhasa has progressed under CCP leadership. This Canadian visitor to Lhasa marvels at how much Tibet has changed since his last visit in 2006 Video: WELCOME TO LHASA TIBET - EXPLORING THE CITY - EP #025 youtube.com/watch?v=J-TfN56ETVM About the One-Child Policy, since its abolishment, the government has started to register unregistered citizens and will provide them with household registration permits and various social benefits such as medical insurance and access to basic education. Source: China to register unregistered citizens chinadaily.com.cn/china/2015-12/09/content_22675371.htm
    1
  17212. @HKZ P "@神州 Shenzhou. Great for you. Too bad your government can't spend that money on getting you clean air." China has pollution problems yes, and its primarily because of our coal powerplants, which produce a lot of smog (even the air in Hong Kong is bad) so the government is switching to green sources of energy. For example, China built the Three Gorges Dam (World's largest hydroelectric powerstation) to supply China with clean, renewable source of energy to fuel our growth, and making China the world's largest producer of clean hydroelectricity. The Largest Dam in The World youtube.com/watch?v=b8cCsUBYSkw China produces the most electricity from hydroelectric power, some 856.4 billion kilowatt hours a year – more than double the amount produced by Brazil, in second place. Source: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/ Of course, switching from coal power to renewable energy is not easy, and it will take some time to make the switch, but at least Chinese government is making efforts to do so. On the other hand, US president Trump promised to brink coal power back to USA, and he even withdrew USA from the 2017 Paris Climate Accord, thus USA does not have to limit its CO2 emissions.
    1
  17213. @HKZ P Ah finally, you are starting to include logic in your views, instead of just blindly parroting the biased Western media. Isn't it better and more enjoyable to discuss in detail, rather that post personal insults against me (such as labeling me a brainwashed CCP troll) and other one-liners? I don't resort to insulting you personally, just because your views happen to differ from mine. Regarding the Three Gorges Dam, yes, initially there were much opposition by environmentalist, ecologists, and archaeologists (because of archaeological dig sites) near Three Gorges Dam. But the advantage of an authoritarian system, is that the government can just 'bulldoze' the opposition and push ahead with construction of the dam, so that we can reap the benefits of renewable energy earlier. If China were democratic, the Three Gorges Dam project would be mired in protests, lobbying, and numerous other delays. I mean, every actions has its pros and cons, but if China hadn't constructed that dam, we would be burning the equivalent of 25 million tons of crude oil or 50 million tons of coal! Therefore, I personally think the Three Gorges Dam was worth it. You are always welcome to differ. Agreed, the government impose environmental rules on CO2 emissions, but bribery and corruption often allows many factories to skirt those rules. This needs to be addressed through anti-corruption crackdowns by the Chinese government but there are many, many factories in China (China is manufacturing hub of the world after all) And many other countries sign the 2017 Paris Climate Accord, not just PRC. I personally think its childish that USA wouldn't want to remain in accords, just because another country is not adhering to the rules. Solar panels may be expensive to produce, but trees don't generate electricity to power our cities like solar panels. Besides, solar panels can also be placed in regions where trees are unable to grow (such as on a lake) In fact, China is home to the world's largest floating solar farm, in Huainan City in Anhui, Eastern China and the 40-megawatt power plant is the world's largest in terms of its capacity. World's largest floating solar farm in East China youtube.com/watch?v=qKpYH5SYUeo Water can helps cool down the panels and thus improve its efficiency and the middle of the lake is one place where you are very unlikely to find trees growing there.
    1
  17214. @HKZ P I mean, China is obviously not perfect of course and there are many flaws, but to constantly concentrate on the negatives while ignoring the positives results in an extremely unbalanced view in my opinion. If you truly don't care about the articles, then why is it you have written so much about China? It's as if you desperately want to have see only the negatives of China that's all, and you shut your eyes and ears to any article that even remotely mentions anything about good things in China. I mean, the world is not just "black and white" after all. For example, Tibet has been part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongolians first conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China, and then incorporated them into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchurians did the same thing centuries later, during the Qing Dynasty. And I have already given my own personal views about Tibet, when it was under 14th Dalai Lama rule, and how much Tibet has improved under CCP rule. But what are your own personal views about Tibet? You keep on bringing up Tibet, then what's your personal take on the situation?
    1
  17215. @HKZ P "@神州 Shenzhou Free Tibet, free Eastern Turkmenistan and free Hong Kong. They don't want you there so leave." Can you actually prove that they don't want CCP there? There are some protests in those territories, but majority of the people in Tibet, Xinjiang and Hong Kong all accept CCP rule. Take the Hong Kong 2014 protests (Umbrella protest) for example. During the protests there were tens of thousands of HK people protesting. about 20-40K protests in Occupy Central movement. But that is small figure compared to the entire population of 7 million Hong Kong people, so how can you claim that HK don't want CCP there? And if you look at those HK protestors, majority of them were naive university students, who've been cloistered in a world of education, raised on textbook ideals and perfect ideologies. They've not yet even stepped out into the real working world as adults, find a job, get married, settle down and raise a family, yet they already think they know how to govern the country already? Look at the leader of the HK protestors and how young is he? Look at the rest of Hong Kong, and most of them went about their own daily lives, some of them even grumbling at the obstruction by the idealistic student protestors. Those are the real HK people, with jobs to do, mouths to feed, kids to raise and so on isn't it? So why are you basing what HK people think from the minority (the 20,000-40,000 protestors), instead of the majority (7,400,000 other HK people) As for the bulldozing over other people's opinion, China is an authoritarian country not a democracy, and I have given numerous logical reasons for bulldozing over the environmentalists, ecologists, archaeologists, etc, so how am I mentally unfit to comment on the PRC? If not for the Three Gorges Dam, we won't be enjoying clean renewable energy like we are today, instead, we might be burning huge amounts of fossil fuels or the project might still be "stuck" because of protests and lobbying to protect those lands. On the other hand, what logic have you provided thus far? Have you anything to say about China's floating solar farm? All you seem to do is insult me and mock me for my views, without offering any of your own views at all.
    1
  17216. @HKZ P Besides space stations and quantum satellites, China is also home to the world's largest radio telescope, the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) also known as Tianyan 天眼 (Eye of the Heavens) and the radio telescope will help scientists learn more about the universe's early days, detect low-frequency gravitational waves and hunt for signals that may have been produced by distant alien civilizations, China Finishes Building World's Largest Radio Telescope https://www.space.com/33357-china-largest-radio-telescope-alien-life.html The larger the dish, the more sensitive the telescope is to detecting signals from outer space, and FAST's potential to discover an alien civilization will be 5 to 10 times that of current equipment, as it can see farther and darker planets. Since its trail operation began in 2016, FAST has identified 44 new pulsars, which are highly magnetized rotating neutron stars that emits beam of electromagnetic radiation towards Earth. 44 pulsars identified by China's FAST telescope youtube.com/watch?v=t9nySMjiUzw
    1
  17217. @HKZ P Can you actually prove that they don't want CCP there? Take the Hong Kong 2014 protests (Umbrella protest) for example. During the protests there were tens of thousands of HK people protesting. about 20-40K protests in Occupy Central movement. But that is small figure compared to the entire population of 7 million Hong Kong people, so how can you claim that HK don't want CCP there? And if you look at those HK protestors, majority of them were naive university students, who've been cloistered in a world of education, raised on textbook ideals and perfect ideologies. They've not yet even stepped out into the real working world as adults, find a job, get married, settle down and raise a family, yet they already think they know how to govern the country already? Look at the leader of the HK protestors and how young is he? Look at the rest of Hong Kong, and most of them went about their own daily lives, some of them even grumbling at the obstruction by the idealistic student protestors.
    1
  17218. @HKZ P "@神州 Shenzhou. Just give the Hong Kong people a referendum with international observers." Why should China do that? Look at Brexit referendum and how much headache British government is in right now? Why should China go looking for trouble where none exists?
    1
  17219. ​@HKZ P I asked for evidence yes, but how is telling China to conducting a referendum in HK evidence? A referendum can go either way, (like in Scotland for example) so you claiming a referendum does not constitute evidence that HK people don't want the CCP isn't it? Where's the evidence in the HK protests then? You failed to produce any evidence of your own, so you just claim "call a referendum" and claim that as "evidence"?
    1
  17220. @HKZ P How are you right and I am wrong? I have shown numerous evidence and cited many sources, whereas all you done is make demands and shut your eyes and ears to anything good that China does. And Beijing is not under any obligation to anyone, to conduct a referendum in HK, so why should a referendum be conducted? An unconducted referendum can go either way, so it does not constitute proof that HK people don't want the CCP isn't it? And what about your arguments about solar panels? China's floating solar farm does not deprive trees of places to grow isn't it? And I have already listed the benefits of the construction of Three Gorges Dam as a clean renewable source of energy that the government push ahead with, despite protests from environmentalists, ecologist and archaeologists. Otherwise, we would not be reaping the benefits of Three Gorges Dam today. I think I know what you are up to, you are jealous that China is doing so well under authoritarianism, and you want to break up China. That's why you keep talking about Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, etc, because you want People's Republic of China to fragment into different provinces (just like when Britain voted to leave the EU). A country is strong if it is unified, not when it is divided and fighting amongst ourselves. Look at United States and it is a union of 50 states, that's why its so strong. Look at former Soviet Union and it was strong until it broke up. So why do you want PRC to fragment into smaller states? Because you are jealous? I mean, you've been constantly insulting me and mocking me, demanding answers out of me, meanwhile you close your eyes to anything I say about China so who is the brainwashed one here? China has grown from dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, into an economic juggernaut, the factory of the world and a potential rival to the USA. All achieved under the CCP rule, so why can't Chinese people continue to support the CCP if it is able to maintain economic growth?
    1
  17221. @HKZ P "@神州 Shenzhou You are just giving Western people an EXTREMELY negative view of Mainlanders" Western society was built upon the backs of African slavery, genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, occupation of their lands even till today and plundering of resources like gold from Africa and Asia (India, Hong Kong, Singapore) etc. That's why Westerners are so rich today, because they're sitting on a pile of wealth obtained from Africa, America, Australia and Asia. Yet you still want to talk about freeing Tibet, Xinjiang and Hong Kong? Tibet was part of China for longer time than the entire colonial history of America, so why don't you tell those non-Native Americans to get out of America and leave the lands to the Native Americans then? And Xinjiang was part of China before Islam ever arrived at the region, and Hong Kong was part of China until the British stole it from China. During 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want what Westerners had to offer, so the British waged two bloody wars with China and force China at gunpoint to open our markets to opium, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was like poison to our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to spread the addictions throughout rest of China, and Hong Kong was taken and made into British colony. Even when Britain renounced control over its former colonies, HK was not fully returned to China during the handover!
    1
  17222. @HKZ P Besides supercomputers and quantum satellites, China also built quantum computing machine that is 24,000 times faster than its international counterparts and 10-100 times faster than the first electronic computer, ENIAC. The researchers working at the University of Science and Technology of China, built the quantum computer in Hefei in Anhui province and they believe that quantum computing could one day dwarf the processing power of supercomputers. Source: World’s First Quantum Computer Made By China — 24,000 Times Faster Than International Counterparts fossbytes.com/worlds-first-quantum-computer-made-by-china/ Source: China Builds World’s First Quantum Computing Machine techviral.net/china-builds-worlds-first-quantum-computing-machine/
    1
  17223. Ray Keller Invasion? Which country is China invading by building artificial islands?
    1
  17224. China claims South China Sea Islands back in 1947, when ROC first published the 11 dash line. None of those countries objected to China's claim, not Philippines, Vietnam, etc. North Vietnamese government formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese. When Philippines became independent, it did not include Scarborough Shoals and other islands west of Philippines as within its national boundaries. But slow those countries began encroaching into Chinese territories. If they had objected to China's claim to South China Sea Islands, why didn't they raise the issue back in 1947, when the map was first published? China is not the one invading any country here, it is others that are trying to steal pieces of Chinese territory claimed since then.
    1
  17225. +Midironica This is letter written by North Vietnam’s former Prime Minister Pham Van Dong in 1958, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam acknowledges that Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese. Diplomatic note from Pham Van Dong to Zhou Enlai en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg +Second One They were part of China's history, so why do you say geographically they aren't? Majority of Paracel islands lie within 200 NM of China's geographic baseline, so why can''t China claim Paracel Islands as part of China? Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracel_Islands#UNCLOS_EEZ The government has opened Paracel Islands for tourism, and tourists can go diving and windsurfing there, and young couples can even get married on the Islands. China Promoting Tourism for Paracel Islands nytimes.com/2016/05/29/world/asia/south-china-sea-tourism.html )
    1
  17226.  @TheRealCheckmate  Putin's goal is not Poland, he clearly stated that his goal is to demilitarised and de-nazify Ukraine. Putin had wanted assurance that NATO would not expand eastward (i.e that Ukraine will not be allowed to join NATO). Many NATO countries like France and Germany are reluctant to admit Ukraine into NATO (citing concerns over Ukraine government corruption) but they refused to put that down in writting to reassure Putin. After realising that for years, his words had fallen on deaf ears, Putin finally decided to act.
    1
  17227.  @jennychuang808  "神州 You are a “ 馬扁子" You can't refute my points so you resort to insults against me for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours? Why not attack my points instead of attacking me personally?
    1
  17228.  @TheRealCheckmate  Putin has been patiently tolerating NATO's expansion (into 14 countries already) for so many years already, and Putin had issued a paper explaining that he wanted assurance that Ukraine would not be allowed to join NATO. Yet why didn't NATO issued a paper or statement guaranteeing Ukraine would not join NATO, in order to assure Putin? In a televised address, Putin had stated that Russia had no plans to occupy Ukraine, so where all this talk about reforming the USSR come from? Putin's stated goal is the demilitarisation and de-nazification of Ukraine. Also the USA treat China and Russia as enemies then why expect Russia or China to cooperate with the US given their attitude? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the US is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  17229.  @TheRealCheckmate  Putin has been patiently tolerating NATO's expansion (into 14 countries already) for so many years already, and Putin had issued a paper explaining that he wanted assurance that Ukraine would not be allowed to join NATO. Yet why didn't NATO issued a paper or statement guaranteeing Ukraine would not join NATO, in order to assure Putin? In a televised address, Putin had stated that Russia had no plans to occupy Ukraine, so where all this talk about reforming the USSR come from? Putin's stated goal is the demilitarisation and de-nazification of Ukraine.
    1
  17230.  @jennychuang808  "神州 You are a “ 馬扁子" You can't refute my points so you resort to insults against me for my views?
    1
  17231.  @jennychuang808  You can't refute my points so you resort to insults against me for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours? Why not attack my points instead of attacking me personally?
    1
  17232.  @TheRealCheckmate  Putin has been patiently tolerating NATO's expansion (into 14 countries already) for so many years already, and Putin had issued a paper explaining that he wanted assurance that Ukraine would not be allowed to join NATO. Yet why didn't NATO issued a paper or statement guaranteeing Ukraine would not join NATO, in order to assure Putin? In a televised address, Putin had stated that Russia had no plans to occupy Ukraine, so where all this talk about reforming the USSR come from?
    1
  17233.  @jennychuang808  "You are a 馬扁子" Is that all you know how to do? Insulting me just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    1
  17234.  @jennychuang808  What makes you think I work for the Communist Party of China? Did I ever mention anything about the CPC here in this thread? I'm talking about Putin and Russia, why are you suddenly bringing up lockdown?
    1
  17235.  @jennychuang808  More insults? Is verbal abuse the only way you know how to communicate? Why not attempt to refute my points instead of accusing me of working for the CPC?
    1
  17236. @Pub Comrad Why do you want the mainland regime to be gone? China today is currently the world's 2nd largest economy, so CCP's collapse would send economic shock waves throughout world markets and possibly result in global recession as Chinese investments dry up and Chinese companies close down and fire their employees. So why do you want such a possible catastrophic event to occur
    1
  17237.  @yannik3229  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  17238.  @MarkYeung1  Did Hong Kong protestors apply for permit? If not, then sorry but people in Hong Kong can't protest without a permit.
    1
  17239.  @yannik3229  China Uncensored is Falun Gong media in order to paint a negative image of China and "demonise" our country.
    1
  17240.  @MarkYeung1  This year is going to be the 100th anniversary of the Communist Party of China. Maybe Hong Kong protestors can try applying for the permit next year or some other year.
    1
  17241.  @ramanathans5679  Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? Here's a short 2-min video of 11 cities in China. Video: 🇨🇳Beautiful Night View of 11 Chinese Cities in 2 Minutes - 中国大陆11座城市美丽夜景 youtu.be/mzR8Scsd33g (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  17242.  @tbcreative562  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According to Gregory Clark, all verified eyewitness accounts say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies (By Gregory Clark) ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053
    1
  17243. If you are humble boy and only earn enough to survive, then it is thanks to affordable Chinese goods, that the cost of living in your country is kept low, and enables you to save on living expenses.
    1
  17244. +Ivo fonsi According to statistics, China manufactures about 70-80% of the entire world's products, so its not far off saying that almost everything is made in China. As for Chinese immigrating out of China, it should be noted that China is world's most populous country, and it is likely that China does not have enough resources to support everyone equally. To China, the rest of the world is severely underpopulated, so there is no urgent need to stop Chinese from leaving China. Many Chinese also leave to study in overseas university and to seek employment opportunities elsewhere. There are also some corrupt Chinese that are on the run from corruption crackdown, so they hide in other countries, and buy up property in order to hide the money outside of China. But the government is also taking measures to get other countries to surrender such people back to China. I never said I am better than you or something like that. I only said that Chinese goods have helped kept people to save money on living expenses. Even if you completely boycott buying Chinese goods altogether, the presence of cheap goods in your country will affect the market prices of other similar goods and therefore lower their prices in order to successfully compete with Chinese goods. This is economic theory by the way.
    1
  17245. +Ivo fonsi China also not paradise and there are problems like environmental pollution and corruption still plaguing the country. But the government is also taking steps to curb pollution, by banning non-electric cars, investing in renewable energy and reducing reliance on fossil fuels like coal plants (which burn dirty and create unwanted smog) The government also taking steps to tackle corruption issues, even those who have fled the country overseas. But of course, these measures take time to implement China's economy is 2nd largest in world, and its growth is driving much of the world economy today. If China's economy suddenly collapses, much of the world will be sent into recession, like America's 2008 financial crisis. Therefore, it is probably in other countries interest that Chinese government continue to maintain economic growth.
    1
  17246. +Steven James DeBlasi Even in United States Military there are ongoing cases of rape. Rape within the US military has become so widespread that it is estimated that a female soldier in Iraq is more likely to be attacked by a fellow soldier than killed by enemy fire. Rape in the US military: America's dirty little secret theguardian.com/society/2011/dec/09/rape-us-military
    1
  17247. +Steven James DeBlasi When did I ever said that women treated better in China than in Western democracies? Can you quote me the exact words I said? When did I mention anything about authoritarian political system actually better than democratic system? You are already making up assumptions about me that's all, when I haven't even talked about anything yet. You claim people instinctively crave freedom, is that why USA is having trouble with gun laws, since under US laws, citizens have the right to bear firearms? Taking away such a "liberty" would be considered going against freedom, which is why the US government has been unable to implement any successful gun laws. In the US, it is easier to commit crimes such as robbery due to easy access to guns by the populace. In other countries with stricter gun laws like China, it is much harder to commit such crimes because of scarcity of firearms, so why should China sudden follow the USA's own version of liberty? Chinese citizens enjoy safety because of gun control, and not every form of "liberty" is beneficial. Otherwise, how do you explain the fact that USA has world's highest prison population, even more than China? Guns being so easily available, only encourage more criminal acts, and makes life of policemen much more dangerous when suspects are more likely to carry guns?
    1
  17248. Steven James DeBlasi Firstly when ever did I even said that "women in China are treated better"? You are the one putting words in my mouth when I clearly did not say such words at all. Seriously, when in my comments did I even mention "women" and "China" in same comment at all, before you started blatantly accusing me of saying so? Also now, when did I personally state that the China or the Communist Party of China are better than the USA here? Just by pointing out single specific flaws or problems? Whenever did I said all those lies you claimed I said?? You are deliberately trying put words in my mouth when I haven't even mentioned anything about the Communist Party of China being better than USA. You are the one claiming here that China's overall system is system/society better than USA or at least no worse, just because of one or two specific aspects alone, not me. Who here judges the whole system based on two aspects? Why are you explicitly claiming things that I have never even said at all? I never did said that these two points alone make China better than USA. You did. Now you claim that Chinese education system lacks critical thinking, when you are the one blatantly making up untrue assumptions about me, not based on any actual things I said? You obviously already harbor unreasonable biased opinion towards me, simply because you are imposing your own biased view onto me and then suddenly label me 50c here. You mean anyone who talks about American flaws is automatically considered 50c? It is clear that you already have your own self-imposed negative impression of me based off imaginary statements made up in your mind about me. The only reason you refuse to quote me what I said was because I clearly said no such things in the first place.
    1
  17249. +Steven James DeBlasi I wrote that, because you were claiming Chinese government was imprisoning and jailing our own people. What is wrong with jailing our own people if they have committed crimes under Chinese laws? I only pointed out that USA has world's largest prison population as a fact, that even China does not match it, but how on Earth does it say that China is better than USA here? You are the one reading too much into my statements. As for rape in US army, it is also fact taken from an article, and I did not say anything about "women in China are treated better" so how is this grounds for blatantly accusing me of saying women in China are treated better? When did I even talk about women in China at all here before you started accusing me? All I did here was point out prevalence of rape in the US army, that's all. Now you suddenly claiming only three possibilities exist when comparing USA and China's political systems? Why do people like you only believe in absolutes, such as black and white? There is no government in the world that is absolutely "equal" to another government. Between China and USA, there are different aspects that are better or worse than each other, so why are you deliberately trying to shoehorn such a complex political entity as "government" into only three absolute possibilities with another government? There are infinite number of possibilities and scenarios where each government will fare better than the other, so why do you limit it to better, worst or equal? I think you are the one clearly lacking in critical thinking skills, if all you do is try to compare which government is better, worst or equal and only consider these possibilities. You think governments are fixed, static entities that somehow remain the same forever and don't change at all with time? How can you just conveniently stereotype governments into better, worst or equal, based on one or two aspects that's all?
    1
  17250. +Steven James DeBlasi Every country has its own laws regarding what's acceptable and what's not. What about Saudi Arabian government continuing to arbitrarily arrest, try, and convict peaceful dissidents? Dozens of human rights defenders and activists are serving long prison sentences for criticizing authorities or advocating political and rights reforms. Under Saudi Arabian Islamic Law, women aren't even allowed to drive. Yet nary a word is even mentioned about this, because USA is steadfast ally with Saudi Arabia because it is rich in oil. Human Rights Watch: Saudi Arabia hrw.org/middle-east/n-africa/saudi-arabia You really think this does not happen in "democratic" countries. What about democratic Singapore? According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore "Singapore’s political environment is stifling. Citizens continue to face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly. The government silences and punishes critics by using defamation laws. The media are regularly censored, particularly for discussions of domestic politics or positive depictions of LGBT people" Human Rights Watch: Singapore hrw.org/asia/singapore And yet Singapore still regarded as one of the most successful democracies worldwide. Doesn't its system sound suspiciously like China's, because Chinese government modeled our system over Singapore's? Once again you have shown to be believing only in Black and White that's all, when the whole world are actually shades of gray. Even you logic is A, B, C, which are all "absolutes" once again. You really think the whole world is consists of absolutes like A is always A, and B always come after A? Haven't you ever heard of "fuzzy" logic, that more closely mimics the real world, than your fixed absolute logic? I really don't understand how you are even demonstrating any "critical" thinking whatsoever here. Lastly, what makes you say the communist party of China is empirically bad? It does more harm than good to our people? The Chinese government is the same government that lifted 600 million people out of poverty, according to World Bank, as the one who ruled China during Mao's Red Communism period. You claim US government is not perfect, then why can't you see that China's government is not perfect as well? Just for comparison, the entire population of Africa is 1.2 billion people. So the communist government lifted a number of people roughly equivalent to 50% of the entire population of Africa out of poverty, in decades, as compared to what Western powers been doing to Africa for centuries. Such a phenomena has been termed "unprecedented" in human history, even by Western scholars, and it is said that such an event is unlikely to ever be repeated elsewhere on Earth. So how can you simply just claim that Chinese government has done more harm than good for Chinese people? How do you even measure such terms such as "harm" and "good" anyway?
    1
  17251. +Steven James DeBlasi I am not German person, but it while it can be said that there are people who would defend Nazi Party, just as there are also people who would defend it. There is no "right" or "wrong" in this world. The Nazi party was formed because of German people's resentment over the Treaty of Versailles, as well as the inflation and state of Germany after WW1. Adolf Hitler rose to power because he preyed on German's people's anger over the treaty, which led to him being elected to eventually become Chancellor of Germany. Under Nazi's leadership, Germany grew powerful and heavily industrialized, and its effects can still be felt today in the form of excellent German engineering in automobiles, such as Volkswagen, and the V-2 rocket, which although was a weapon, still formed the basis of NASA rocket systems that enabled America to land on the Moon. Of course everyone knows of the atrocities of WW2, but there is still no denying that Nazi Party also contributed to progress and development of Germany. But does that mean I support Nazism here? Of course not. But I am not denying that Nazis did contribute to Germany's successful development as nation. Only people who believe in Black and White like you, will want to label things as better, worse or equal. China's poverty numbers were derived from the World Bank, so are you claiming that the World Bank is inaccurate? According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012. China also has world's largest population, so reducing poverty from 88% to 6.5% is astonishing feat in itself. Besides poverty reduction, UNESCO has also measured Chinese literacy rate, and the adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. So how exactly again do you measure "harm" here?
    1
  17252. +Steven James DeBlasi Because I, unlike you, do not believe in absolutes such as good or evil. Who is the one that keep on shoehorning such antiquated concepts into a discussion about politics? There always two sides to history, so who are you to label terms such as "harmful" onto a government, simply because of your own personal beliefs? If the Nazis had won WW2, the world would have been much different place altogether and they would of course portray all the bad things Allies had done isn't it? So why can't people look at history from an objective point instead? You keep on claiming that I am propagandist or part of 50c party, but do you even read your source carefully? According to your source, the 50c party operate in Chinese social media and internet forums, like Weibo, etc. It does not mention anything at all about them venturing into Western websites like Youtube. So why are you assuming that I am 50c or propagandist of the communist party? You mean anyone who expresses support for the Chinese government must be from 50c party? You are the one clearly lacking in "critical" thinking skills, if you fail to see that 50c reside within Chinese social media and internet forums, NOT in Western media. Chinese government has corruption, but at least there are corruption crackdowns campaigns undertaken by the party to root out corruption. On the other hand, US government also has corruption, but what steps have ever been taken to address the issue? President Trump promised during his presidential campaign to release his tax details upon become president of United States, but so far, he has not kept his promise. What about Hilary Clinton, who is being investigated for corruption by CIA, but so far, not much news and progress is made about her previous activities? Corruption is universal phenomena, but at least the Chinese government is actively willing to tackle this huge monster of a problem.
    1
  17253. +Andy S I agreed with you. In my personal opinion, politics should be about doing what's right, not what's popular. Sometimes, the popular thing may not be right, and the right thing may not be popular. For example, British people had referendum whether to leave EU or not, and majority voted to leave the EU, but does that necessarily mean that it is the right thing to do? British PM David Cameron was against the separation, and he announced his resignation after hearing the results of the polling. As for China, China's One-Child Policy is extremely unpopular with Han Chinese, but it was put into effect in order to help prevent China being overwhelmed by massive population and having insufficient resources to support such large population. It did what it was supposed to do and was effective (almost too effective) in slowing down China's birthrate, and due to the declining birthrate, a new Two-Child Policy is introduced. China has 5000 years history and is one of world's oldest "continuous" civilizations still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Rome and Egypt have long since faded to history. China has over 3000 years of governing experience to draw upon, so I also don't understand why Westerners believe China should follow their governing systems when modern Western democracy only has history of about, say 200-300 years?
    1
  17254. What's so strange about that? China has "One Country, Two Systems" policy which allows different parts of China to have different passport. For example, Hong Kong has their own passport separate from the mainland, but Hong Kong is still part of China under the One Country, Two Systems Policy.
    1
  17255.  @NhanNguyen-pp6yw  China helped Vietnam gained independence from France. During the First Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons (ranging from artillery guns to rifles and machine-guns), ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help Vietnam fight for independence from France. Source: First Indochina War wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Indochina_War#China From 1950 to 1954, the Chinese government shipped goods, materials, and medicine worth $43 billion (in 2019 dollars) to Vietnam. From 1950 to 1956, the Chinese government had also shipped 155,000 small arms, 58 million rounds of ammunition, 4,630 artillery pieces, 1,080,000 artillery shells, 840,000 hand grenades, 1,400,000 uniforms, 1,200 vehicles, 14,000 tons of food, and 26,000 tons of fuel to Vietnam. But some Vietnamese nationalists conveniently forgotten Chinese aid to them and some even claimed Vietnam won their independence all by themselves.
    1
  17256. Many of the protestors were seen carrying US flags and UK flags.
    1
  17257. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  17258. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17259. China experienced brain drain in the past, as intellectuals leave China and migrate elsewhere. Trump's policies are reversing the brain drain in China, as overseas Chinese start to feel unwanted in the USA, and many are opting to return to the homeland and contribute their talents to China.
    1
  17260. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17261. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  17262. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17263. Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17264. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17265. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China as stated in Republic of China's own constitution.
    1
  17266. They also say they want a cease-fire in Gaza, but they still continue sending weapons to the IDF.
    1
  17267.  @blafonovision4342  When I think of Wolf Warriors, I think of American diplomats like Jake Sullivan, John Kirby and Anthony Blinken.
    1
  17268. It's a combination of the “Red Scare” (fear of communism) and the “Yellow Peril” (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so thoroughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    1
  17269.  @jpnewman1688  Brian talks about the puppet masters in all the time, in all his videos about the NED's influence in Thailand, Myanmar, Laos, etc.
    1
  17270.  @yslee1401  Of course! Putting Meng under house arrest protects her from the CPC's clutches! It all makes perfect sense now! Canada is playing the hero and actually protecting Meng from the CPC, who'd thought up such a conspiracy theory?
    1
  17271.  Gaylord Manlove  About dictatorship in China, the Chinese government has produced 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans etc, to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's political system. Whereas in the USA for example, the US presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short-term plans for America's future, instead of long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US's political system.
    1
  17272.  @yslee1401  China has produced many successful Internet companies like Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, Suning.com, Bytedance (Tik Tok), Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, Kuaishou, Trip.com, Pinduoduo, Sina Corp, Sohu, and so on. Source: List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies#List But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  17273.  @fake-news  "神州 Shenzhou It's so funny that her neighbor is the American ambassador of USA in Vancouver, Canada." The US ambassador in Canada is no friend to Meng Wanzhou. She didn't even break any Canadian laws while in Canada, yet USA still got Canada to arrest her without proof of her crime.
    1
  17274.  @fake-news  The US ambassador lives two houses next to Meng, but what did the US ambassador ever do? Did he/she stand up for Meng or appear in court to defend Meng? And have you been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? Meng Wanzhou was born in China and it's China that she considers home.
    1
  17275.  @yslee1401  Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  17276.  @yslee1401  Source: German IT watchdog says 'no evidence' of Huawei spying thelocal.de/20181216/german-it-watchdog-says-no-evidence-of-huawei-spying Germany's IT watchdog has expressed scepticism about calls for a boycott of Chinese telecoms giant Huawei, saying it has seen no evidence the firm could use its equipment to spy for Beijing, news weekly Spiegel reported. "For such serious decisions like a ban, you need proof," the head of Germany's Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Arne Schönbohm, told Spiegel, adding that his agency had no such evidence.
    1
  17277.  Gaylord Manlove  If you want to talk about the worst prison system then it's actually America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate
    1
  17278.  @yslee1401  France’s cybersecurity chief said his agency hasn’t uncovered any evidence of Huawei Technologies Co. spying via Europe’s communications networks. Source: There’s no proof to show Huawei was spying in Europe, France says theprint.in/world/theres-no-proof-to-show-huawei-was-spying-in-europe-france-says/357011/
    1
  17279.  @yslee1401  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. All verified eyewitness present in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 said that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Link: ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053
    1
  17280.  @yslee1401  "神州 Shenzhou yeah right. CNN reporter filmed red army tanks rolling over the head of the protestors" Could you show this CNN footage of tanks rolling over the protestors? If you're referring to the infamous Tankman photo, it has since been debunked according to my previous source. As for Tankman, we now know from the cameraman himself that his widely-publicised photo was taken from his hotel window the day AFTER the riots, and the tanks were going away from, not into, the Square.
    1
  17281.  @KeyboardWarrior  Mistakes do appear yes, I'll agree. Everyone is human after all. But if he did indeed make a mistake, then can't I point out his mistake without being labelled "nit-picking" by you?
    1
  17282.  @JD-yz4kr  At 20:15 , Brian said: "if they just cut economic ties with Taiwan, the country will gut itself" so is he saying Taiwan and mainland China will gut itself? No, I'm pretty sure Brian made a mistake that's all, but the point is that if Brian wants to go around catching other people for saying "Taiwan is a country" then he shouldn't be so careless to do the same himself. Because the anti-China trolls will be all over him, if he doesn't practice what he preaches.
    1
  17283. Here's inside video of Chinese BYD mask factory. Video: China: Factory produces 5 million masks a day in bid to supply shortfall youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw?t=17
    1
  17284.  @MiguelMendez-sd9xi  USA lost the Vietnam War to starving communist Vietnam peasants.
    1
  17285. Americans need to face the fact that without China, USA would have zero chance of dialogue with North Korea at all. Even the last time US and North Korea had a dialogue during the Six Party Talks, was held in Beijing. If Trump wants to claim all the credit for this, then why don't Kim just visit Washington directly for talks, instead of turning to Beijing?
    1
  17286. @CloudSheep "神州 Shenzhou bots must be stupid, it's really not hard to find out." Why don't you attempt to refute my points then? You claim you have unfettered access, then have you actually been on WeChat, Sina Weibo, Tencent QQ, Tencent Video, Xiao HongShu, Douban, Zhihu, Meituan, Toutiao, and DouYin (TikTok) and see what people think?
    1
  17287. Exactly. China's Metaverse aims to turn cyberspace into real space. Whereas the U.S's Metaverse aims to turn real space into cyberspace
    1
  17288.  @abbotsful  So you know about serpentza and c-milk lying about Dune movie posters in China, then how does that make the two of them trustworthy?
    1
  17289.  @abbotsful  "神州 Shenzhou no, read what I wrote, a different example please," A different example is laowhy86 claiming that Uighur videos on Tiktok contained secret emoji codes, but this has been debunked according this video: The most ridiculous evidence of genocide in Xinjiang youtu.be/hLNJaODz8Ak
    1
  17290.  @abbotsful  That's already 2 strikes for serpentza and c-milk attempting to mislead their audiences with lies. Yet their followers are vast, and they gobble up these lies because it feeds into their anti-China feelings.
    1
  17291.  @redfieldchris1217  The Chinese government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and halt production, impose quarantine measures, closing tourist attractions, banning mass gatherings, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives over the economy and contain the virus. Now that the virus is under control, it's finally paying off as China begins slowly restarting our economy. But in Western countries like US and UK, their economies are too precious to sacrifice so sadly human health has to be sacrificed instead. Donald Trump wants to reopen America by Easter, and Boris Johnson is relying on "herd immunity" to pull through. So it's too bad that Western countries seem to prioritise economy over human health.
    1
  17292.  @redfieldchris1217  The Chinese government rushed to built a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised. Video: Huoshenshan: the hospital built in 10 days in China over coronavirus outbreak youtu.be/l2QfufpwfdY Kudos to the Chinese construction workers who worked hard to build those hospitals. China also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. Video: Time-lapse video shows how Leishenshan hospital completed in 12 days youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk
    1
  17293.  @redfieldchris1217  About the Hong Kong problem being financed by America, I watched some Hong Kong protestors waving United States Flag 🇺🇲 and United Kingdom Flag 🇬🇧 among the crowds, so is it possible that some anti-China foreign power is trying to stir up trouble in Hong Kong and drive a wedge between Hong Kong and the mainland? I mean, the Hong Kong protests been ongoing for more than 6 months, so is it possible that some foreign power is secretly sponsoring the protests from behind the scenes?
    1
  17294.  @redfieldchris1217  Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  17295.  @redfieldchris1217  Previously, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule from 1841-1997, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's handover that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as British colony?
    1
  17296.  @Jimmy-er2mc  Actually, Chinese and other East Asians like Japanese and Koreans, are perhaps among the most intelligent and diligent people in the world, with rich histories and diverse cultures. Why can't East Asians just put aside our differences and form a united body that looks out for East Asian interests? I mean, the Soviet Union was a powerful force during its time. The United States consists of 50 states and the European Union consist of 28 countries. Even South East Asian countries have ASEAN to look for their interests, social why can't we have one for East Asia (China, Japan, Korea) as well?
    1
  17297.  @redfieldchris1217  Hong Kong will eventually be fully returned back to China by 2047 anyway, once the Sino-British declaration finally expires after 50 years after the 1997 handover. Chinese government is patient and there's no need to lift a finger and eventually Hong Kong will be fully returned back to China in the future.
    1
  17298.  @redfieldchris1217  In the past, Hong Kong was once a prosperous port city under British colonial rule, while the mainland was still dirt-poor at that time. Today however, fortunes have reversed and Hong Kong has since fallen behind rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhoushan, and is facing increasingly higher levels of competition from other upcoming mainland cities, like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian, etc. No wonder why some Hong Kong people feel like they're being left behind. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports
    1
  17299. Network speeds of over 1 Gigabyte per second? So you can download a file over a 5G network, say with filesize 6 GB, in just 6 seconds?
    1
  17300. It's astonishing that even after all they have done, the Israeli media continues to insist that its military is the "most moral army" in the world.
    1
  17301. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17302. lancerfour Beijing only approves which candidates can run for democracy, but in the end, it is Hong Kong citizens themselves that actually vote the person into power that's all.
    1
  17303. lancerfour Democracy means that the country's leaders are elected by the people. Hong Kong's leaders are elected by their people, so which part of this is not democracy? Beijing does not elect the next leaders of HK.
    1
  17304. lancerfour Hong-Kong people still get to elect their leaders. During elections periods, the people of HK gather to cast their votes as part of democracy and the candidate with the most votes wins. During 2017 Hong-Kong election, Carrie Lam won the majority vote at 777 out of 1200 votes, so how is this not democracy then? Why don't you explain precisely how this isn't democracy, instead of just comparing it to Russia all the time? No mainland Chinese people casted any vote, during HK elections isn't it?
    1
  17305.  @abuabdullah731  Why does Islam itself have a generally negative reputation worldwide, outside of Islamic countries? I didn't create this bad image of Islam, they brought this upon themselves. Mosques are being constructed in the West (in Spotsylvania County, Virginia for example) and some residents are not happy with this turn of events. Video: Man protests Mosque's construction youtube.com/watch?v=INy4gaUrCL4 Pinning the blame on me singularly won't make erase Islam's poor reputation. What fake names and scathing comments? I don't resort to hurling insults against people just because their views differ from mine.
    1
  17306. China built the world's fastest supercomputer, Sunway Taihulight 神威·太湖之光 as well as the world's 2nd fastest supercomputer, Tianhe-2 天河-2. China built the world's largest radio telescope, the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST) also known as Tianyan 天眼 or "Eye of the Heavens". China also built the world's largest high speed railway, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hispeed railway network and the rest of the world put together. Of course, China is not altogether perfect and there are many flaws of China, but Chinese people are no way inferior to Westerners. China has found success following our current form of government, so why are some Westerners telling Chinese how to behave in our own lands? Not every country has to follow Western Democracy to be successful and China is living proof of that.
    1
  17307. +nicodabastard "Dave Satun you live in a dictatorship your entire life is a lie you have been indoctrinated to be stupid and see your government as God's" Have you even been to China? Here is a short 2 min clip about 11 Chinese cities Video: Beautiful Night View of China 2016 youtube.com/watch?v=G7ZRa-w9xyA
    1
  17308. +Mirozen Melissa McQueen did not even post anything other than "Wu Mao has entered the chat" whereas Dave Satun has made multiple attempts to communicate (even if his English isn't good) so why blame him for his poor mastery of English? Why mock his English proficiency instead of responding to his points?
    1
  17309. +Mirozen You've no "complaints" about his English proficiency, then why did you said earlier that "He needs to master the sentence structure used by a native speaker of English." Even I myself don't claim to have mastered the sentence structure used by a native speaker of English, since English is not even my 1st language! But you said earlier that "his sentence structure shows that his native language is almost certainly Chinese" then perhaps could you enlighten me on how his sentence structure indicates his native language to be Chinese. In that comment you highlighted (I'm White, U r just one of the many self hating immigrants.....) he doesn't actually show anything that is specifically indicative of Chinese sentence structure. About Dave Satun's rudeness, initially he wasn't rude and didn't become rude until other users started hurling vulgarities at him and accusing him of being a wumao. If you pick on his posts being rude, aggressive, defensive, offensive, ignorant, etc, then what about the others who first started accusing him of being a wumao? His comment that "Google and FB are US military tools" is not what I would consider ignorant, since media is the backbone of any political propaganda campaign. He claims to be Caucasian, but it doesn't automatically mean English is his native language, as he could be French, German, Irish or from all manner of countries that Caucasians usually hail from. It certainly doesn't mean that someone has to be proficient in English to be Caucasian!
    1
  17310. +Mirozen First you said "He needs to master the sentence structure used by a native speaker of English" (now with an addition:) "if he expects people not to assume he's Wu Mao". Then later you mentioned that my English happens to be "Better than many native English speakers". This shows that even among native English speakers, there exists varying degrees of English proficiency so who can truly determine where the baseline for the English standard is, for a native speaker of English? YouTube is an informal Internet forum, and users may themselves have good English, but still choose to contract their sentences in their posts. Therefore you can't truly assume whether someone is good or bad in English online, until they demonstrate their true capabilities. Heck, scratch that, it may not even be the same user typing out the same posts each time. You mentioned that Dave Satun "drops" certain keywords in certain comments, then perhaps you could enlighten me to which words were supposedly dropped from his sentences? Also, dropping certain English words from sentence is not just restricted to Chinese, and even Spanish speakers sometimes do away with some words, and the English they speak becomes a sort of "broken" English (sometimes known as Pidgin English) But the term is not restricted to Chinese speakers attempting to speak English alone. About Dave Satun posting rude comments like "you are just one of the many self hating immigrants (white wannabes) living in Shitamerica", as far as I know, there is nothing truly pro-Chinese in that statement alone, so why are claiming it as such? And you seem to refuse to consider the abusive comments directed against him, such as 岷褪黨素菜1 posting "@Dave Satun you're retarded" or "@Dave Satun Fucking Wumao, good job 👏👏👏". Why is it that you single out Dave Satun's comments, but not the ones who are attacking him personally? I've read the entire comment thread a few times, and Dave Satun did not start using rude terms, until others started attacking him with vulgarities first. It just gives off the impression that you are somehow prejudiced against him that's all. About his point of people starving on the streets of L. A, I did a quick search, and about 44,000 people in L. A are homeless. I personally don't think that he is being ignorant in mentioning the situation in L. A, and you can't possibly think that all 44,000 people are homeless because of mental illness! ON THE STREETS -- a feature documentary on homelessness in L.A. Video: youtube.com/watch?v=WUsJcPc8g0A About him being a Caucasian but not a native speaker of English, so far, you have yet to produce evidence yourself, that his sentence structure in English mimics that of the Chinese sentence structure. All you seem to do is repeat the same point that his sentence structure follows that of the Chinese language, without ever explaining why or going in to detail. His comments are mostly about America and Taiwan (and I do agree with him that Taiwan is merely catering to US's interests, not for Chinese interests) so why do you claim that his comments on YouTube that give people a negative attitude towards China and the Chinese people?
    1
  17311. +Mirozen I'll try to shorten my posts. If you believe that "Even native speakers of English have variances in structure and vocabulary that are indicative of where they are from." then you can't possibly claim "He needs to master the sentence structure used by a native speaker of English". Since native speakers of English exhibit variances in structure, then there's no way to master something that exhibit such variances. Re:Paragraph (4) I did not say that you claimed EVERY post made by Satun was "pro-Chinese" all I said was "there is nothing truly pro-Chinese in THAT STATEMENT alone,". Because there really is nothing in that statement that is pro-Chinese, only anti-American that's all, so why did you claim he is posting pro-Chinese content? He's talking about immigrants in America, and somehow that is considered pro-Chinese by you? Actually, the better point is not him being insulted by being labelled a wumao its the fact that 岷褪黨素菜1 used clearly offensive terms like "You're retarded" and "Fucking" in his posts addressed to Dave Satun. Yet you seem blind to those blatantly offensive terms and instead you choose to focus on the term wumao instead? Why do you appear to selectively ignore other commenters' rudeness (岷褪黨素菜1 for example) and single out Dave Satun? Re:Paragraph (5) Homeless is one problem in LA but that does not mean starvation in LA does not exist. Here another source showcasing hunger in LA and according to Feeding America, more than 1 million children and teens in Los Angeles are eligible for subsidized meals and may be at risk of hunger, especially during the summer months. Of those, 650,000, more than half, are considered “food insecure.” Ending Childhood Hunger, Starting with Los Angeles http://sodexoinsights.com/ending-childhood-hunger-starting-with-los-angeles/ Starving to death in America is the same as starving to death in 3rd world countries. Starvation is starvation, death is death, and people die of starvation in 1st world and 3rd world countries. I personally wouldn't consider such remarks to be "ignorant", and its those who continue to look the other way of such plights in 1st world countries, that are truly ignorant. About claiming his sentence structure mimics/follows or is similar to Chinese sentence structure, I ask you HOW? How do you know that his sentence structure is similar to Chinese? Which examples show that his structure is similar to Chinese sentence structures? What are those missing "keywords" he dropped? You have consistently failed to prove how his sentence structure follows that of Chinese language and you refuse to name even a single example where his sentence structure follows Chinese instead of English. Dave Satun had said "Taiwan is a cheap brothel 4 americans" and "the real micro SHITaiwan backed by the US military" but how exactly do these comments give a negative impression of China? He didn't even mention China at all in those statements! Yet you claim his posts gives off the opposite of a positive impression of China? Where is the link to "China" in his words, when he himself did not even mention China at all? The thing is, why can't he post comments against a video that was describing the type of comments he was making? Why can't he limit his response to short remarks, inside of typing out long paragraphs like the both of us? It's possible his command of English isn't that good, and that's one possible reason why his responses are limited.
    1
  17312. +Mirozen 1st Paragraph: How do you know that his sentence structure appears to be from a person who speaks Chinese as their native language? What are those "keywords" you claims he dropped? You completely fail to elaborate exactly where does his sentence structure follows Chinese, you just keep on repeating that it is, without providing solid proof. Do you even know Chinese, and Chinese sentence structure at all? Or are you shooting off your mouth without proof? 2nd Paragraph: Again, you fail to elaborate how exactly is Dave Satun's comments pro-Chinese. He didn't even mention China at all, only Taiwan and America, and somehow you draw some insane conclusion that his comments are pro-Chinese? He didn't even mention "China" for heaven's sake, just talked about America and Taiwan, so where on Earth do you draw your senseless conclusions from? 3rd Paragraph: You have consistently failed to prove that his sentence structure is from a person who speaks Chinese as his native language, so what good does standing by your own stand do? You clearly ignored blatantly offensive words like "You're Retarded" and "Fucking" that were made by 岷褪黨素菜1 and instead picked on Dave Satun for his retaliation against 岷褪黨素菜1. He even clearly says he's white, but I'm sure your just going to ignore that as well. Dave Satun didn't use vulgarities initially, and only when others hurled such profanities against him that he began retaliating. And you posted the same set of points you made in the previous comment. Why repost it? I've already made my response to those points, so what does reposting them do any good? 4th Paragraph: You just say my additional information supports exactly what I've been saying? How? America has people starving, and 3rd world countries has people starving too, so how is that different? Previously, you have been adamantly claiming that being "homeless" and "starving" are different, and now you are suddenly accepting that America has people starving, once I shown my information? Starvation is starvation and death is death. Go tell those starving Americans that they are different from 3rd world people starving to death, and see if they label you as ignorant. 6th Paragraph: If I listen to someone who has learned Chinese Mandarin as a 2nd language, yes I can usually tell that Chinese Mandarin is not their native language. However, I won't be able to accurately tell whether his/her 1st language is English, French, German, Spanish, Russian, etc. Unless I know the other language as well, I won't proclaim that the speaker is a native speaker English or French or German, etc. Even in your examples, you fail to illustrate exactly how exactly you know Dave Satun's sentence structure follows that of Chinese sentence structure. 7th Paragraph: About Dave Satun being petty and insecure, I could say the same thing about 岷褪黨素菜1 for his/her use of vulgarities against Dave Satun (who was merely expressing his own views bluntly, without vulgarities) But its like this 岷褪黨素菜1 is somehow completely invisible to you, and you have completely ignored his/her provocative comments to Dave Satun, and just focused on picking on the latter. 岷褪黨素菜1 doesn't even address Dave Satun's comments before launching a profanity barrage against him. 8th Paragraph: 1) Its his own choice to post his comments after watching such a video. But where do these people who accuse him of being a wumao, get their impression of him from? They just watch some video posted by some guy and assume he's a wumao with zero proof of their own? 2) It could be he types short sentences because he's using his phone or some other device smaller than a PC. If you claim he does so to make money, then why isn't he responding to you? 3) Oh now you suddenly claim he shows an excellent command of English? Why the sudden abrupt change in view? Where does he demonstrate that he has excellent command of the English language? Enjoy your flight and safe journeys.
    1
  17313.  @kirb_erus  What makes you think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending money on your economies. Your Western schools and universities are positively flooded by Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Lenovo, ZTE, Oppo, etc, are expanding overseas and hiring your people, and Chinese investors are buying up property and real estate in your countries. So what makes you think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese people can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up a fifth of the world's population today. Go to your local neighborhood and how many Chinese nationals can you find? Or go to your local university and ask your local students how they feel about the "Chinese competition"
    1
  17314.  @dangerdan2592  So just because you saw a video of Chinese police handcuffing a guy, suddenly means that China is authoritarian? Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? Why do you judge all of China based on a single video?
    1
  17315.  @dangerdan2592  So you haven't actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? I mean, I've seen numerous instances of authoritarian police in USA, where the Caucasian American cop can just shoot the African American suspect first and ask questions later. That seems why more authoritarian isn't it?
    1
  17316.  @dangerdan2592  "神州 Shenzhou You also never answered my question. What don't you like about the Chinese government?" What I don't like about the government is the pollution in cities. China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Just search for "Largest Dam in the World" on Youtube. Now that I answered your question, could you tell me what do like about the Chinese government? It's only fair.
    1
  17317.  @trunginh2421  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  17318.  @trunginh2421  Granted, the Communist Party of China is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  17319.  @trunginh2421  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Wikipedia: Poverty in China And it's been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-China propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  17320.  @georgeinjapan6583  About the Social Credit System, many foreigners often complain Chinese people spit in public, smoke in non-smoking areas, jump queues, disobey traffic rules, jay walk, drive on wrong side of the road, speed through red lights, etc when not all Chinese people are like that. We Chinese feel embarrassed that such bad people represent China overseas, so the government introduce social credit system to discourage such bad behaviour and promote better behaviour instead. This is a meritocratic system where good behaviour is rewarded and bad behaviour penalised. But if such people persist with bad behaviour, until their scores fall to become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisances of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again.
    1
  17321.  @georgeinjapan6583  What makes you think "You don't even know your own score"? You can always log in to government website to check your social credit score and they list the criteria, so how exactly is it an opaque system?
    1
  17322.  @georgeinjapan6583  Have you login to government website to look at the criteria for China's social credit score? Of course, the criteria isn't certainly set in stone, it's always evolving to suit societal needs. But if not for the social credit system, then how else to tackle the problem of bad Chinese tourists behaviour? The government has tried numerous other means (like education for example) and they failed, so why can't the government implement social credit system to help discourage bad Chinese behaviour (spitting in public, smoking in non-smoking areas, jaywalking, disobey traffic laws) and help promote better social behaviour among people in China?
    1
  17323.  @georgeinjapan6583  Under the Social Credit System, citizens may be rewarded with points if we perform good deeds. Remember that video in which numerous passers-by ignored a little girl hit by truck? With the new social credit system in place, citizens who offer to lend a helping hand may receive points to their social credit score and this would hopefully instill good samaritan behaviour among citizens.
    1
  17324.  @georgeinjapan6583  What's your proposed solution to the problem of bad Chinese tourists behaviour then, since you apparently disagree with the Social Credit System? All you done is s**t on China's achievements, it's like you're just biased against China's success under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, that's all
    1
  17325.  @georgeinjapan6583  Granted, the Communist Party of China is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  17326.  @georgeinjapan6583  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  17327.  @georgeinjapan6583  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Wikipedia: Poverty in China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 Link: statista(dot)com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china
    1
  17328.  @georgeinjapan6583  So if I fail to convince you (even after I use logic and cite articles, statistics) does that mean that you simply refuse to admit that China is successful under the Communist Party of China? If you claimed that China did not need the CPC before, then why was China a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country under the previous "democratic" Republic of China (1912-1949)? Why did the ROC 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage; they were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were lousy, and they had far fewer numbers (only 50 communist members in 1921) over the Kuomintang. The KMT on the other hand, had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training, and far superior numbers over the the communists. Securing victory against the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT. Yet the communists survived all KMT attempts to wipe them out, employing strategies like "Long March" (长征) and despite KMT's initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan). This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland.
    1
  17329.  @georgeinjapan6583  Let's hear your thoughts, you disagree with China's Social Credit System, then how else do you propose to solve the problem of bad Chinese tourists behaviour? Many Chinese are ashamed that such bad Chinese tourists behaviour come to represent our country, so why can't the government implement social credit score to encourage good social behaviour and penalise bad behaviour? Could you please explain your reasoning behind your thinking? You quote 1984 and Animal Farm, but those books are clearly works of fiction written by authors who deliberately exaggerate the negative aspects of technology for entertainment purposes in order to attract readers. Why are you asking me to real more books of fiction and then claim that reality will follow in their predictions?
    1
  17330.  @georgeinjapan6583  So you're just ignoring my question of how else do you propose to solve the problem of bad Chinese tourists behaviour? You disagree with the Social Credit System, then what's your alternative solution then? I'm all ears for your input. You encouraged people to travel, then have you yourself actually set foot on China and see what life is like here for yourself? President Xi Jinping has shown to be a strong and competent leader, governing a country of 1.4 billion people (certainly no easy feat) then can't he remain in power to maximise the benefits to China? Good leaders are hard to come by after all, so can't Xi be allowed to govern China longer? I mean, look at German Chancellor Angela Merkel been in power for so long already, whereas other Western leaders have stepped down, yet nobody is complaining about German Chancellor being in power for so long.
    1
  17331.  @georgeinjapan6583  Take 20 years to pay off? So you want some Chinese to be in debt for decades? Or what if the fines are inconsequential and rich Chinese tourists can afford to pay the fines, so they don't mind committing bad social behaviour, because they can get away with paying the fine? I mean, here the Chinese government have come up with an innovative way to deal with bad social behaviour, through the social credit system, yet people like you dismiss it, because you're biased against China that's all. I have listed several reasons why I think the social credit system works, but you're unable to refute my points, you told me to read 1984 and Animal Farm which are merely works of fiction, in which the authors deliberately exaggerate the negative consequences of technology for entertainment purposes that's all. But the nature of fiction is that reality may not follow in their example.
    1
  17332.  @georgeinjapan6583  And you told people to travel more, but have you actually set foot on China and see what life is like here for yourself? China has lifted 700 million people out of poverty in just 40 years, whereas the whole rest of the world only lifted 150 million by comparison. And it's been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-China propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. "China has lifted 728 million people out of poverty by international standards. The whole rest of the world has only lifted 152 million." - John Ross, Well-known columnist in UK, Former Deputy mayor of London. Video: Historical achievement: Take 700 million out of poverty Link: youtube(dot)com/watch?v=CljWffPgmG8
    1
  17333. Chinese government is reviving the "Mandate of Heaven" doctrine, where a competent leader is allowed to stay in power, to maximise the benefits to China, while an incompetent leader will result in rebellion to topple the dynasty, as part of Heaven's decree. Although ancient, this doctrine has guided China successfully for 5000 years of history.
    1
  17334.  @fars7346  It's your funeral then, just like it's Ukraine's. In fact, Philippines' maritime boundaries were drawn in the 1898 Treaty of Paris and they DO NOT include the South China Sea Islands. (Source: Wikipedia: File: Ph boundary in Treaty of Paris 1898)
    1
  17335.  @olimpmarkcunanan  The United States promised to support Ukraine, but look at the toll that the Russian special miltary operation is having on Ukraine. Does Philippines want to be involved in a conflict in, say the Taiwan Strait, and end up like Ukraine?
    1
  17336.  @urbanlegendzero9750  The name West Philippine Sea is not internationally recognized. The region is known internationally as the South China Sea, and as I've stated, the Treaty of Paris laid out Philippines maritime boundary, which does not include the South China Sea. And if the "extended documentation" included those iselets, why drew up Philippines maritime boundary in the first place?
    1
  17337.  @urbanlegendzero9750  In 1999, president Joseph Estrada promised that the grounded vessel would be towed away. In 2014, the Chinese government asked the Philippines to remove the grounded ship. In 2017, China and the Philippines established a gentlemen's agreement that the status quo be maintained for the South China Sea, as both sides tried to strengthen their relations. Under the status quo agreement, no construction materials are allowed to fortify the Sierra Madre. Yet the Philippines went against the agreement and instead made use of supply ships to reinforce the rusting hull of the grounded vessel.
    1
  17338.  @i.p.0179  Republic of China (now Taiwan) first drew up the 11 Dash Line in 1947. Even the USA acknowledged the 11 Dash Line, and the Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence in 1946 that the Spratlys was not Philippine territory, both to not anger Chiang Kai-shek in China and because the Spratlys were not part of the Philippines per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America.
    1
  17339.  @rommelperalta6111  It's astonishing how you paint China as a dominant giant Golaith country when historically it was the United States that fought against Philippines and made Philippines into an American colony. Have you forgotten the war history so soon?
    1
  17340.  @urbanlegendzero9750  So you're saying in the first version Spain drew it out of colonialism? That means it's not truly Philippine territory, it's merely additional territory attached as a result of colonialism, then how's it a concrete claim? And just because the US ask that the water or sea around those islands or islets be added to Philippines that means it's accepted? The US is seeking to provoke a new conflict in Asia, of course they would attribute disputed territory towards Philippines in order to create unnecessary tensions. And the fact remains that the internationally recognized name for the region is the South China Sea. You're the one calling it the West Philippines Seas out of the blue, when it's not the internationally recognized name, yet you're accusing me of claiming it just because of names?
    1
  17341.  @urbanlegendzero9750  Under the status quo agreement, Philippine vessels may deliver “only water and food” to the BRP Sierra Madre, the grounded World War II-era warship. Thus, any attempt by the Philippines to bring in construction materials to fortify Sierra Madre would be in violation of the agreement. (Source: Duterte’s China ‘agreement’ on Ayungin prevented supply of construction material, says his spokesman by Philippine Daily Inquirer, Jane Bautista)
    1
  17342.  @axisense8651  I've long provided my side of the argument, but all you've done is ignored it. What gives Philippines the right to claim the territory then? According to the Treaty of Paris, Philippine's maritime boundary does not include the South China Sea. And the Philippines intentionally parked a rusting vessel on the Second Thomas Shoal and repeated refused to remove the vessel, in order to stake its claim there.
    1
  17343.  @urbanlegendzero9750  The UNCLOS tribunal at the Permanent Court of Arbitration concluded that Second Thomas Shoal do not generate an entitlement to a territorial sea, exclusive economic zone or continental shelf. Yet the Philippines intentionally grounded a rusty vessel onto the shoal, and refused to remove it.
    1
  17344.  @urbanlegendzero9750  You said: "Shenzhou. construction materials? Where the hell did you get that? From your own imagination again?" Even the Manila Standard has reported that repairs on the BRP Sierra Madre have begun. Why are you constantly accusing me of imagining things?
    1
  17345.  @urbanlegendzero9750  You said: "Shenzhou. but we never supplied any construction materials on the said vessel, my god xD." A team of reporters from The Inquirer visited the grounded vessel in late June 2022. At the time, the Navy-manned wooden boat Unaizah May 2, where the Inquirer was embedded, carried construction materials such as angle bars, welding electrodes and deck plates, aside from the food supplies. Aboard the BRP Sierra Madre—where a handful of sailors were stationed on a rotation basis to stake the country’s claim in that area—were signs of repair to keep the ship from falling apart. This is coming from reporters, yet you're claiming it's my imagination?
    1
  17346.  @michaelblue2965  Taiwan is where the former Republic of China government fled to after the Chines Civil War. Both ROC and PRC claim to be China (i.e One China principle) and the 11-Dash Line was drawn up by ROC and was revised to 9-Dash Line by the PRC.
    1
  17347.  @leonguererro-n8s  "The Spaniards came followed by the Americans and the Japanese." It's astonishing that Philippines was historically invaded by the Americans and the American-Philippine war resulted in the tragic deaths of some 250,000 Filipinos and Philippines was made into an American colony. Yet China without any history of invading Philippines, is now being portrayed as invader, instead of the US.
    1
  17348.  @fars7346  According to an article entitled Who Supports China in the South China Sea and Why published by The Diplomat, the author found 70 countries that expressed their support for China's position in the South China Sea, compared to the 5-7 countries that support Philippines stance.
    1
  17349.  @urbanlegendzero9750  Your own Philippine president Joseph Estrada made a promise in 1999 that the vessel would be towed away, now Philippines is backing out of the promise. As for construction materials, Philippine President Duterte made a gentleman's agreement with China not to supply construction materials, so again, the Philippines backed out of the agreement. (It's astonishing that earlier you said: "Shenzhou. construction materials? Where the hell did you get that? From your own imagination again? Shenzhou. but we never supplied any construction materials on the said vessel, my god xD.". But when faced with proof of construction materials, you're now saying: "Who are you to stop us resupplying contruction materials for the vessel?" The hypocrisy)
    1
  17350.  @urbanlegendzero9750  "Shenzhou. funny thing about that article is that the author is your very own people xD am I right?" The Diplomat is an Australian magazine owned by Japanese company and headquartered in Washington, D.C. Just because the authors of the article happen to have Chinese names, suddenly means that the Diplomat is unreliable? Why are you discriminating against the article because of Chinese names?
    1
  17351.  @belle_lustre  Philippines grounded a vessel and refuse to remove it, despite promising to do so. Philippines had a gentleman's agreement not to supply construction materials to the rusting vessel, yet again they violated the agreement and sent supply ships to reinforce the rusting hull of the grounded vessel. Yet when I bring up these issues, you hurl insults against others for their views.
    1
  17352.  @manueldelfin1152  So does Philippines want to become the next Ukraine?
    1
  17353.  @fars7346  "Shenzhou. As expected the article is made by By Wang Wen and Chen Xiaochen." What's wrong with the authors of The Diplomat article having Chinese names? Are you outright saying that you discriminate against Chinese people? The legal basis? It's the support from 70 countries according to the article, that provides the legal basis. "most of websites are linked to chinese websites" Again, what's wrong with Chinese websites? You can always use Google Translate if you need translation, why are you discriminating against the langauge?
    1
  17354. A war between nuclear powers is not joke. Mushroom clouds do not have a silver lining.
    1
  17355. ThatFlyGuy Every few years, Apple will produce a new iPhone model to stay ahead of its competitors, so why is there a need to make older iPhones models last many many years?
    1
  17356. +Sam Shyam Mao Zedong is only human and made mistakes like one. Mao Zedong managed to unify China under communism, which the previous KMT administration of China failed to accomplish. Under KMT rule, China lost control of Tibet, and our provinces were divided and ruled by individual warlords, and even Japan invaded China during this period. But where KMT failed, the communists managed to unify China, proclaim the People's Republic of China and retake Tibet as part of our country. That's why Mao Zedong's portrait is hung at Tiananmen Square in Beijing. Which country in the world would disrespect their founding father? If not for Mao Zedong unifying China, China today would probably still be fragmented and constantly fighting among ourselves. I mean, even the 1st American President, George Washington, killed many Americans during the American Civil War, where Americans killed Americans and America won in the end, yet Americans revere him as one of their founding fathers. Where did you get your figure of 60 million Chinese lives lost during Mao's rule? Even the WWII death toll was about 40 million, yet you claim more Chinese lives were lost during Mao's rule? In 1950s, China's estimated population was only about 600 million, so you mean to say China lost 10% of our population under Mao?
    1
  17357. +Sam Shyam Are you sure to spoke to real Tibetan refugees? Tibet is surrounded by mountains under treacherous low temperature and low oxygen environments, so the CCP stop the villagers from leaving the villages else they would die in the cold journey. What makes you think those people would even be able to trade their materials with other people? What version of history did you learn then? Mao Zedong did unified China and founded the People's Republic of China in 1949. Dr. Sun Yatsen founded the Republic of China in 1911 by overthrowing the Qing dynasty rulers, but China lost control of Tibet, and was divided and ruled by individual warlords. During the Japanese invasion of China, Chiang Kal-shek (Jiang Jieshi) refused to ally with the communists against the Japanese, and in fact, two of his KMT generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng had to kidnap Chiang and force him into a truce with the Communist party, an event known as the Xi'an Incident So wasn't Chiang initially reluctant to ally with the communists against the Japanese invaders? In fact, Chiang Kai shek started the entire Chinese Civil War when he purged thousands of communists during the 1927 Shanghai massacre and that started the whole Chinese Civil War that cost KMT control over the mainland and fleeing to Taiwan. You keep on saying Mao is responsible for this and for that, then why did under Mao Zedong, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates fell? According to the following source China's population (Year) 544,112,923 (1950) 598,574,241 (1955) 644,450,173 (1960) 706,590,947 (1965) 808,510,712 (1970) 905,580,445 (1975) Source: Population of China 1950 populationpyramid.net/china/1950/ So by the time of Mao Zedong's death in 1976, China's population had almost doubled from 544 million to 905 million. So why do you Westerners keep on blaming Mao Zedong for a supposed 60 million deaths (more than even WWII death toll) Why is China the world's most populous country today, if had supposedly we suffered more deaths than even WWII? You based what you know about Mao upon people who fled him? Not from those who remained in China? How is that a fair judgement of someone if you only know him through his dissidents you tell me?
    1
  17358. +Christopher Sean What wrong with the stuff I wrote?
    1
  17359. +Kianglek Tan Why are you hurling insults against me? Calling my mind rubbish? What do you want me to tell you that's new? You were the one claiming "The CCP now is not like it used to be, it's rubbish now" then you failed to elaborate, so why blame me for elaborating on my points?
    1
  17360. +Daltreicsha Moel "UN declared that Inland China would be China and Island China would be Taiwan." In the 1971, the United Nation countries voted to kick Taiwan out of the UN Security Council and to recognize People's Republic of China as China. The United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed on 25 October 1971, recognized the PRC as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" with 76 nations voting in favor, and 35 nations opposing, So how did UN declared Island China would be Taiwan?
    1
  17361. +The Page Squad Since you claimed "Mao even thanked Japan" then what where his exact spoken words?
    1
  17362.  @currentchannel3452  David Fincher’s 1999 movie《Fight Club》is based on Chuck Palahniuk's 1996 novel of the same name. China’s ending is actually closer to Palahniuk’s original vision for the ending of “Fight Club,” as written in his 1996 book. The book's author even confirms this in an interview. As Palahniuk told TMZ while reacting to China’s censorship, “The irony is that the way the Chinese have changed it is they’ve aligned the ending almost exactly with the ending of the book, as opposed to Fincher’s ending, which was the more spectacular visual ending. So in a way, the Chinese brought the movie back to the book a little bit.” Palahniuk also said it was interesting that suddenly everyone cared about a censored “Fight Club” ending when he’s spent nearly his entire career fighting censorship and bans when it comes to his books. “My books are heavily banned throughout the U.S.,” Palahniuk said. “The Texas prison system refuses to carry my books in their libraries. A lot of public schools and most private schools refuse to carry my books. But it’s only an issue once China changes the end of a movie? I’ve been putting up with book banning for a long time.”
    1
  17363.  @kaimingraymondchoi9909  If we go by your logic that the U.S is a free country since they can block anything they like, then isn't China also a free country since China can block anything we like as well?
    1
  17364.  @bbj7383  Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: https://www.mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  17365.  @bbj7383  Besides smartphones, Chinese companies also dominate the civilian drone industry and Chinese company DJI is world's largest civilian drone-maker according to the following source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: top10drone.com/top-drone-companies/ But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  17366.  @wordywordson6408   Here's a vid of modern day Lhasa, Tibet, China (filmed by WildFilmsIndia) and you can see how developed Lhasa has become under communist party rule. Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, and modern technology like cars, telephone cables, computers, smartphones, WiFi, the Internet, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo Even the poorest Tibetan farmer can afford a smartphone, connect to the Internet and shop online in Taobao and have his purchases shipped all the way to Tibet in the Himalayas. Because Tibet is part of China after all.
    1
  17367.  @solenoidnull9542  The West is in decline and China is rising.
    1
  17368.  @joshlewis575  The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the U.S. A total of 1,735,000 U.S. dollars (equivalent to $16,370,805 in 2022) was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964. How do you think Chinese government would react to a supposed religious leader bought off by the Americans?
    1
  17369.  @joshlewis575  The 14th Dalai Lama sold out to the Americans! A total of 1,735,000 U.S. dollars (equivalent to $16,370,805 in 2022) was devoted to the Tibetan program in 1964. How would China react to this foreign agent disguised as a "religious leader"?
    1
  17370. +Bolly Movies Effort what?
    1
  17371. Bolly Movies The government has incentives to entice people to shift into and fill up the apartments.
    1
  17372. China is also the 3rd country to demonstrate anti-satellite capabilities in 2007, by taking out a 750 kg satellite in orbit at altitude of 865 km, with a ground launched missile. If China takes out Indian military satellites in space, then the Indian army ground troops will be at disadvantage without satellite coordination.
    1
  17373. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17374. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  17375. +darren hescano The Filipino Coastguard shot to death a Chinese fisherman, 65-year old Hung Shih-cheng (洪石成) yet you want to complain about Filipino fishermen being harassed by Chinese military personnel? Which Filipino fishermen has been shot or killed by Chinese military personnel?
    1
  17376. Lt. Pyukumuku It was a Chinese fishing vessel versus a armed Philippine coastguard, so what death threats are you talking about?
    1
  17377.  @bockscar1  USA bomb two of Japan cities but still the Japanese clearly refused to surrender, so why USA claim they defeated Japan? The last campaign fought in WWII that led to Japanese surrender was actually the Soviet Union invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria that finally led to Japanese surrender. Source: Soviet Invasion of Manchuria was the last campaign of WWII wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Manchuria
    1
  17378.  @NaughtyNovaroo69  If you claim Taiwan is the real China then why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1919) lost the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China.
    1
  17379.  @abelgerli  "Europe and the world should cancel the unhealthy relation to China" China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    1
  17380.  @abelgerli  "Map destroyed the soul of the country. Family values and ethics of a mature civilization. Taiwan is the real China with values of Chinese culture preserved that Map has destroyed." China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. Taiwan's political system following a Western style democracy is actually a foreign concept to China, nowhere in China's history was there allowing ordinary people to participate in political decision-making. In fact, mainland China's authoritarian political system with President Xi Jinping and the Communist Party of China closely emulates the ancient political system of the Emperor and the Imperial Court.
    1
  17381.  @R_Alexander029  "Saying that Taiwan is part of China is like saying the sun revolves around the earth." If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a Map of all the territory Taiwan claims (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  17382.  @R_Alexander029  At 18:30 of John Oliver's video, the poll indicates that overwhelming majority (87%) of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Any declaration of independence by Taiwan would be considered changing the status quo, which is not what the majority of the people of Taiwan want, they prefer the status quo that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  17383.  @R_Alexander029  "神州 Shenzhou Then why would Mr. Xi threaten to invade by force a country full of people who want to be part of the main land?" Did President Xi ever made such a threat? Xi Jinping has stated many times that Beijing is committed to peaceful reunification with Taiwan, and since Taiwan's constitution considers Taiwan as part of China, then what invasion of another country are you talking about? "I think a more clear reflection of what the Taiwance people want is the politicians they elect and the views they hold which clearly fall closer to an independent Taiwan than a CCP ruled Taiwan." That's just your own speculation that's all. According to John Oliver's poll at 18:30 only a minority (5.6%) of people in Taiwan want independence, the overwhelming majority (87%) want the status quo to continue. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China, and any move to declare independence would be seen as altering the status quo, and this is not the wish of majority of the people of Taiwan.
    1
  17384.  @R_Alexander029  "神州 Shenzhou Recnetly on the 9th of October Mr. Xi said that "peaceful reunification" will be a relaised (after harassing Taiwan with aircraft)" So clearly Beijing's goal is peaceful reunification, when did President Xi Jinping ever said anything about invasion, you tell me? And mainland Chinese aircraft flew in international airspace so what harassment are you accusing PLAAF aircraft of? Even at 2:02 of Oliver's video, mainland Chinese aircraft were closer to mainland China than Taiwan. "Do you seriously believe Mr. Xi would respect the wishes Tawian to self govern themselves democratically?" Previously, President Xi Jinping once offered to extend the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy to include Taiwan. That means that Taiwan would be fully reunified with the mainland, but Taiwan would be allowed to keep their government, and the mainland would be allowed to keep ours (as in the case with Hong Kong with their government separate from the mainland). But the then Taiwan President Ma Ying-jeou rejected President Xi's offer and did offer a counter proposal of their own. "The status quo (existing status) of Taiwan is self democratic governance. And thats what the majority of Tawiance people wish." The status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China, and any move to declare independence is changing the status quo, an outcome that the overwhelming majority of Taiwan do not support.
    1
  17385.  @Apollonos  "Mainland China is now a disaster, thanks to the incompetent CCP. China's dams are collapsing. China is suffering from floods, famine and Covid." The world is suffering from climate change and this includes floods plaguing other countries then how is the Communist Party of China to blame for bad weather conditions? But Chinese government response has been swift rescue teams have been dispatched to affected areas for disaster relief. And what famine are you talking about when China can support 20% of the worlds population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export to other countries? If China was undergoing a famine, then other countries that depend on Chinese agricultural imports will be the first to feel it. You said: "Under the DPP, the independent country of Taiwan has become a thriving, prosperous democracy." Taiwan's success was actually built by the authoritarian single-party KMT rule. Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Even John Oliver acknowledges it at 6:25 of the video. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952-1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983-1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965-1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965-1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China. You said: "Taiwan has done a wonderful job of managing the Covid pandemic. The Taiwanese people are happy, prosperous and free." Taiwan is suffering under democracy, look at the Taiwan parliament members throwing chairs and water balloons at each other at 8:21 of John Oliver's video. And Taiwan only vaccinated 68% of their population, whereas mainland China vaccinated over 80% of our population. And if Taiwan was supposedly an independent country, then why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country could? Is there something preventing Taiwan from joining the UN? You said: "The DPP has demonstrated that is much more capable of governing a country successfully than the CCP. The people of mainland China would be much better off under the DPP than the CCP." The DPP can't even govern an Island well, let alone the mainland, what makes you think the people of China will be much better off under the DPP than the CPC? Mainland China is world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made-in-China) having world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now it's been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on U.S weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global prescence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between global powers. Just recently, the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua switched recognition of Taipei to Beijing.
    1
  17386.  @HitodamaKyrie  You could. The problem is that many history students in the West tend to know only the Taiwan side, but not the mainland side of the story.
    1
  17387.  @HitodamaKyrie  If you go and read Taiwan's constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. And according to polls, the majority of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo, and the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  17388.  @Apollonos  "神州 Shenzhou I don't like bullies or dictators-for-life, like Xi." About China's "dictators for life", China has put forth numerous 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long-term planning. Whereas in the United states for example, the U.S president have to step down after 4-8 years, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long-term plans spanning, say 10 years into the future. This is the disadvantage of U.S short-term leadership.
    1
  17389.  @Apollonos  What makes you think Chinese culture is destroyed and that the only Chinese culture and tradition that is left in the world is now in Taiwan? China has many historical monuments like The Great Wall of China, Forbidden City, Qin Emperor Tomb, Terracotta Army, The Grand Canal (world's oldest and longest artificial river) and many more historical sites. Here's some videos of Chinese historical monuments. Video: The Great Wall of China in 4k - DJI Phantom 4 youtu.be/EotbKqZmBuY?t=20 Video: Forbidden City, Beijing, China in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/R9vcSWb6mug Video: Terracotta Army, Xian, China in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/VhIouznYlvo Seriously, have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself, before you claim that Chinese culture is destroyed and that the only remaining Chinese culture and tradition that is left in the world is in Taiwan?
    1
  17390.  @HitodamaKyrie  "神州 Shenzhou I imagine it actually says Taiwan is China." The Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1919) lost the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan. During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China. You said: "Changing that would involve a declaration of independence which the mainland would likely use as an excuse for war." So Taiwan can't formally declare independence, then it just means Taiwan isn't independent after if there's something controlling Taiwan and preventing them from declaring independence. You said: "Taiwan is de facto independent already." If Taiwan was truly independent, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there something preventing Taiwan from joining the UN? Then how's Taiwan de facto independent? You said: "The status quo supports that. And we're talking about the people of Taiwan." So the status quo supports the fact that Taiwan cannot formally declare independent? And that Taiwan is part of China according to it's constitution? That means the majority of the people of Taiwan support the status quo that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  17391.  @Apollonos  Again, why can't you explain why you think that Chinese culture is destroyed and that Chinese culture and traditions in the world are in Taiwan? Chinese celebrate many historical festivals such as Spring Festival (Chinese New Year), Lantern Festival, Qingming (Grave Sweeping) Festival, Dragonboat Festival, Double Seventh (Chinese Valentines Day) Festival, Mid-autumn Festival, and so on. Here's some video of Chinese festivals in China. Video: Dragon Boat Races Celebrate China's Ancient Past | National Geographic youtu.be/YlPExNPyPwQ Video: Lantern Festival celebrated across China youtu.be/XnXzQ-p-DpY Video: How modern Chinese celebrate the Qingming Festival youtu.be/mFGYrPNXaLg Yet you're claiming Chinese culture is destroyed?
    1
  17392.  @HitodamaKyrie  "Your first bit of copy and paste text is irrelevant because we're talking about the independence of Taiwan in the present." How is it irrelevant? We were talking about Taiwan's constitution saying Taiwan is China, but the KMT lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan, so if anything, how does this support the claim that Taiwan is China? You said: "For the second bit, that's not how it works. China is not controlling Taiwan. It's threatening it. That vast majority of Taiwanese people just want to live their lives in peace." You have just illustrated that since Taiwan can't formally declare independence, they are being controlled. I mean, even in the Olympics, Taiwan cannot even participate as their own so-called "country" they have to use the name "Chinese Taipei" (seen at 10:30 of John Oliver's video) then how exactly is Taiwan independent when they can't even decide their own name at the Olympics? You said: "Joining the United Nations is not a requirement for being an independent nation." If anything, Taiwan not being able to join the United Nations shows that it's certainly not an independent country, isn't it? You said: "And as for something preventing Taiwan, yes there is something. China." Congratulations, you've just proven what I've been saying all along, that Taiwan isn't independent since mainland China prevents Taiwan from joining the United Nations. Taiwan can't even decide their own name in the Olympics, then how is Taiwan considered independent? You said: "Again, I'm fairly certain the constitution of Taiwan does not claim itself as "part of" China, but rather "China"" Go and read Taiwan's constitution again, please. Taiwan's constitution claims that Taiwan is part of China. Even if you claim Taiwan is China, their constitution clearly indicates that Taiwan is part of their territory, so in effect, Taiwan is part of China, no matter which way you try and twist it. You said: " And while I imagine that removing that claim would be pretty well supported, the PRC may very well use it as a casus belli which would involve war and death." Look at 18:30 of John Oliver's poll, it shows that only a minority of the people of Taiwan (5.6%) want independence and that a vast majority of the people of Taiwan (87%) prefer the status quo. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution, is that Taiwan is part of China, and a declaration of independence would be considered changing the status quo, a result that the majority in Taiwan do not support. You said: "Without some hope for a guarantee of a peaceful resolution, the "status quo" of denying the PRC is the middle ground that the Taiwanese people are effectively forced into." The status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China, and that's what the majority of the people of Taiwan polled prefer. Any move to declare independence would be considered changing the status quo, a result that's not supported by vast majority of the people of Taiwan, and even you admitted that Taiwan is unable to declare independence (or join the UN) because the mainland clearly controls Taiwan. Then Taiwan is not independent after all, since they are being controlled by the mainland, isn't it? You said: "Those 5000 years of "China" has seen it repeatedly break apart. Governments and Emperors are not what connects a people through history." China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. You said: "But hey, feel free to write your own essay on how if you take a situation out of context and apply faulty logic then China should totally have the right to conquer an independent people because once upon a time their ancestors lived in the same place and had an argument over how things should be done." How have I taken a situation out of context? I've shown that the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1919) lost the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan. I've shown that only a minority of people (5.6%) in Taiwan want independence, and that majority of the people of Taiwan (87%) prefer the status quo. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Any amendment to Taiwan's constitution (such as declaring independence) would be seen as changing the status quo and this is not what the majority of the people of Taiwan want. And we've already shown that any move by Taiwan to declare independence would be met with force from the mainland, then Taiwan is not independent after all, since they can't even pick their own name at the Olympics. I mean, I've given irrefutable proof that Taiwan is certainly not independent and is part of China. Even just recently, the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua switched allegiance and recognition of Taipei to Beijing.
    1
  17393.  @Apollonos  You said: "If Xi wants to resign and let Tsai Ing-wen and the DPP rule China, I would support that." But nobody in mainland China ever voted for Tsai and the DPP to rule our country, then why do you support the DPP ruling China? The DPP didn't even participate in the Chinese Civil War, it was the KMT that fought against the Communists, but they still lost the mainland and had to flee to Taiwan, so why do the DPP deserve to rule China, you tell me?
    1
  17394.  @HitodamaKyrie  "神州 Shenzhou Your canned responses are amusing. You've not irrefutably proven anything aside from your own bias." I use logic and cite examples to support my argument. Taiwan is unable to declare independence because of the mainland (even you have admitted such) and Taiwan is cannot join the United Nations because according to you, the mainland China is preventing them from doing so. This should already dispels the notion that Taiwan is independent, given that they are letting mainland China dictate what they can or cannot do. Even at the Olympics, Taiwan can't even decide their own name, they have to use the name 'Chinese Taipei' (seen at 10:30 of John Oliver's video) then what more proof is needed that Taiwan isn't independent? You said: "You repeatedly misunderstand or more likely intentionally misrepresent what that 87% in favor of maintaining the status quo bit means." How have I misunderstood or misrepresented what the 87% in favor of maintaining the status quo means? The status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Any move to amend its constitution or declare independence would be seen as changing the status quo, which is not what the majority of the people of Taiwan prefer. You said: "If a declaration of independence were a more viable option, then I suspect the "independence as soon as possible" percentage would be drastically higher." That's just your own speculation without proof that's all. According to the polls at 18:30, only a small number of people (5.6%) want independence, the majority of the people of Taiwan (87%) prefer the status quo. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China, any move to change the status quo (such as declaring independence) is not what the majority of the people of Taiwan desire. I mean, my arguments are well-grounded in reality, based off polls and other information, that's why I've presented a solid argument as to why Taiwan isn't independent, and that only a minority want independence, while the majority of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo (which is that Taiwan is part of China). My points reinforce each other, whereas it appears yours is based on speculation and what-ifs that's all. Yet you're accusing me of misunderstanding or misrepresenting the data gleamed?
    1
  17395.  @JaneDoe-ci3gj  As the first Western country to build diplomatic ties with the People’s Republic of China 🇨🇳, Sweden 🇸🇪 does not recognize the so-called Republic of China 🇹🇼, does not recognize Taiwan as a country, and it has been so since 9 May, 1950 when the diplomatic ties between China and Sweden were established.
    1
  17396. The communist party of China transformed China from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into an economic powerhouse today, the world's factory (Made in China) a growing scientific and technological power, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army.
    1
  17397.  @pinkfloyd19831  Communist North Korea was actually more successful country on the Korean Peninsula than South Korea, who had GDP lower than some Sub-Subsaran African countries. Only because U.S. foreign assistance has helped South Korea rise from poverty and the economic devastation of The Korean War. Source: How US foreign assistance has helped South Korea https://borgenproject.org/u-s-foreign-assistance-has-helped-south-korea/ The United States’ $35 billion investment in economic foreign assistance has helped the Republic of Korea (ROK), once one of the poorest nations, become the world’s 12th largest economy. Whereas USA slap crippling sanctions on North Korea and stymied its economic growth, so that's why North Korea is poor and South Korea is prosperous. Not because of ideology, but because of US favouritism.
    1
  17398.  @pinkfloyd19831  Hong Kong is successful because it was previously under authoritarian British colonial rule from 1841-1997, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before? And Singapore been ruled by authoritarian single-party PAP dictatorship for its entire life as a nation. For over 50 years, People's Action Party ruled Singapore with an iron fist and Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore’s founder) was a (benevolent) dictator who jailed and exiled his political rivals and dissidents. So what freedom are you even talking about?
    1
  17399.  @Raving_Rando  China has lifted 700 million people out of poverty in just 40 years, whereas the whole rest of the world only lifted 150 million by comparison. Video: Historical achievement: Take 700 million out of poverty youtu.be/CljWffPgmG8 "China has lifted 728 million people out of poverty by international standards. The whole rest of the world has only lifted 152 million." - John Ross, Well-known columnist in UK, Former Deputy mayor of London.
    1
  17400.  @ztezmaxim2683  Killing own citizens? China was undergoing Chinese Civil War at that time, so of course Chinese were killing Chinese people. Just like in American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans. Or Vietnamese killing Vietnamese in Vietnam War. Or Koreans in Korean War or any civil war for that matter.
    1
  17401.  @Awkci_gaming  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china
    1
  17402.  @zerefsunlimitedshipworks  The Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, Europe, USA and India. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  17403. Indeed. By the end of this war, Ukraine will probably be littered with NATO weapon remnants, and scavengers would make a living selling whatever they can scrap off to the black market.
    1
  17404.  @brianfoley4328  You said: "except that it has nothing to do with whether or not China knows how to operate a navy." I thought it's a given that China knows how to operate a navy. The People's Liberation Army Navy is the world's largest navy (by number of ships) so what makes you seem to think China doesn't know how to operate a Navy? You said: "or if just launching an Aircraft Carrier means that China is now a naval force to be reckoned with." The PLAN already operates 2 aircraft carriers (Liaoning and Shandong) this is the 3rd aircraft carrier (Fujian) that China is launching, so why are you acting like this is the first time China is launching an aircraft carrier?
    1
  17405. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17406. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  17407. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17408. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17409. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, if you read its constitution.
    1
  17410. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17411. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China....
    1
  17412. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, no doubt about it.
    1
  17413. No doubt about it, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17414. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  17415.  @junebug8485  You said: "神州 Shenzhou My point is that you side stepped it saying "we should look at it as good governance instead" which is not a definition of democracy but rather you being bias." How would you define good governance then? If the government is able to deliver what the people want, then isn't good governance a form of democracy in of itself? Isn't bad governance an example of the government being unable to deliver what the people want, and therefore not democracy?
    1
  17416.  @junebug8485  You said: "however here in the US what the government delivers is ultimately up to what the people want (hence living in a democracy)," I disagree. Take the U.S sending aid to Ukraine for example, how is this the will of the ordinary Americans? The U.S is sending millions of their taxpayers money to a country (that's known for its corruption) and isn't even a member of NATO for crying out loud, amid the rising food and gas prices are enacting a toll on the ordinary citizens lives. How is this a democracy when the U.S government isn't doing what the ordinary Americans want? So what if you have the ability to contact government officials? Do the government officials actually enact the change that you want? In China, there are similar channels in which ordinary Chinese can contact their local political representatives to lodge complaints, which are then taken note of in the local representatives performance. You said: "In my opinion, if no one seeks to change an issue then is it really worth delivering?" So you're saying Americans are pretty much satisfied with their lot in life then? Yet why is there unrest brewing across much of the Western democracies today? The U.S is clearly a plutocracy. Many Americans often lament how the 1% controls the 99%, and the rich Americans are able to influence U.S political decision-making through lobbying. For example, the U.S wages wars in the Middle East to control the oil at the will of the American oil companies (but at the expense of ordinary Americans).
    1
  17417.  @junebug8485  In 2017, the World Economic Forum answered the question: Which countries are on the right track, according to their citizens?_ The results were: China: 10% (Wrong Track), 90% (Right Direction) Saudi Arabia: 20% (Wrong Track), 80% (Right Direction) India: 24% (Wrong Track), 76% (Right Direction) Russia: 42% (Wrong Track), 58% (Right Direction) ... Canada: 50% (Wrong Track), 50% (Right Direction) <-- Canada is 50/50 Japan: 57% (Wrong Track), 43% (Right Direction) Australia: 55% (Wrong Track), 45% (Right Direction) United States: 65% (Wrong Track), 35% (Right Direction) Germany: 68% (Wrong Track), 32% (Right Direction) .... Source: WEF: Which countries are on the right track, according to their citizens? Judging from the above survey by WEF, it appears that the overwhelming majority of Chinese polled feel that China is on the right track, while the same cannot be said of the U.S and other Western democracies. This seems to imply that the Chinese government is able to deliver what the ordinary Chinese want, and that China might in fact be considered more democratic than even the United States. Thus, China appears to fit the definition of a democracy being a government of the people, by the people, for the people, whereas the U.S is a government of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%.
    1
  17418.  @bartonlee3594  The former German Chancellor served 4 terms (and would have gone on to a fifth if she didn't decide not to run in the last election) whereas President Xi is only entering his third term.
    1
  17419.  @junebug8485  "神州 Shenzhou Disliking a government party plays right into whether or not citizens think their government is on track (doing the right thing)," Read the WEF article carefully, the question is not whether the government is on track, it's which countries are on the right track, according to their citizens, not about disliking which government party. It's about the country as a whole, not about the government. Trump was democratically elected as Presidents by the American people, so if people surveyed feel that their country is on the wrong direction, it means that the government they voted into power is unable to deliver what the ordinary Americans want, so it's not a democracy in the sense that I've defined earlier. Also, the PRC having one government doesn't mean that the people are of one opinion. There still clearly exists opposition, even if only 10%, then how does your argument of one government, one opinion make sense at all? It just so happens that China's government is able to deliver what the people want, so the overwhelming majority of people surveyed think that China is on the right track. Then isn't this a form of democracy in of itself? You said: "You also need to take into consideration the type of people who were interviewed as well as the number of people interviewed," Opinion surveys cannot possible survey the entire population, so they take a sample size that's meant to represent the entire population. Mind you, this survey was published by reputable and respected organization, the World Economic Forum, so would they risk the damage to their reputation by being selective in their survey? Biden's Inflation Reduction Act is doing little to reduce inflation. Rising prices slowed temporarily because of falling gas prices at that time, rather than anything in this bill. Also, in the bill, the provisions on prescription medicines don't start until 2026, how does this bill help in the immediate period with the rising prices? You said: "And no, the PRC isn't "more democratic". You purposely dodge the fact that the US provides for it's people. Yes, the PRC does give the people what they need, and Yes the US does the same. This is why I called your argument bias in my first chat as you neglected to mention that the US provides for it's people as well and yet you completely left it out to advance your own personal argument." In my first statement, I wrote: However, if a government is able to consistently deliver what the people want (i.e China's) then doesn't it fit the definition of a democracy? so how is this statement wrong? Even you admitted that: "Yes the PRC does give the people what they want," and the survey results (90% Chinese believing China is on the right track) indicate that it's more consistent than say the 65% of Americans thinking that their country is on the wrong track. You said: "And no, there isn't any censorship in America, let me explain." There clearly is. Even on YouTube platform itself, it's apparent that censorship in America exists. Your explanation is the American social media is owned by private corporations, but these private corporations can still choose to censor comments and ban people's accounts, then how is this not censorship? For example, Trump's Twitter, Instagram and other social media accounts were banned after the Jan 6 Capitol Hill riots, during a period when Trump was still technically the POTUS. This just goes to show how much power the private companies have over even the American government. So how is the U.S not a plutocracy with a government of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%? The social media can just shut down people who disagree.
    1
  17420.  @junebug8485  You said: "Can it truly be called The "People's" Republic of China? Maybe instead itshould be "The Government's Republic of China"" China pursues a policy of a "People's democratic dictatorship" where no matter what the Chinese government does, it has to bow down to the demands of the people (or the proletariat, i.e "workers"). This is in stark contrast to a "dictatorship of the 1%" (or the bourgeoisie, i.e upper-class) which is what's happening in America today. No matter what the American government does, it has to bow down to the demands of the 1%, not to the demands of the people. That's why the fact remains that the U.S is a not a democracy with a government of the people, by the people, for the people, but a plutocracy with a government of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%. (On a side not, not only are democratic institutions failing in the U.S but also in other Western democracies like the UK, in which British PM Liz Truss recently tendered her resignation. Because Truss is unable to deliver what the British people want, can that truly be called a democracy? Compare the chaos of UK's parliament with the orderly 20th National Congress in China, discussing China's next step forward)
    1
  17421.  @bartonlee3594  China is not following word-for-word the ideology that Marxism-Leninism posits. China is adapting our own special historical circumstances (or material conditions) to formulate a governing system that works best for China. It just so happens that China has always benefited from a strong central government throughout our history, so the current system of President Xi and the Communist Party is designed to closely emulate the authoritarian rule of Emperors and the Imperial Court of China's long history. China's current political philosophy marries the Marxist-Leninist view of Socialism with characteristics of Chinese governance, forming a synthesis of that's commonly known as Socialism with Chinese Characteristics. The strong central government is an element of Chinese history that has been incorporated into Chinese governing philosophy, so it's not going away anytime soon. While communism for China might remain a distant endgoal for China, personally I don't think China will attain it, the closest would most likely be a sort of "Communism with Chinese Characteristics" rather than pure Communism.
    1
  17422.  @junebug8485  You said: "A government is the foundation on which a country is built." But a government is not the only foundation. Countries are also defined by people, cultures, ethnicity, history, and various other attributes. Read the WEF article, it clearly asks the question Which countries are on the right track, according to their citizens. For example, some Americans feel that America is heading in the wrong direction with the "woke" culture of supporting LGBTQ, BLM, immigration issues and so on. You said: "Regardless if you choose to believe it or not, America is defined as a democracy... In our constitution the first 3 words are "We the people of the United States"." So you're saying America is a democracy because it's in its name? Who is the one giving America this definition of democracy? North Korea calls itself the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea, so does this mean you agree that North Korea is a democracy as well? And why is it you accept America as a democracy because of its constitution, but when it comes to the People's Republic of China, you question it and suggest renaming it? Earlier you wrote: "Can it truly be called The "People's" Republic of China? Maybe instead itshould be "The Government's Republic of China"." so why the double standards here? You said: "The PRC's one government, one system influencing opinions makes a lot of sense." It doesn't. While media in China is controlled by the government, but opposition is still present. If it was truly one opinion, then there should be 100% agreement (which is not the case, it's around 80-90%). And clearly the government's actions have resulted in the improvement of lives of many Chinese. Poverty alleviation efforts by the communist party has lifted some 800 million people out of poverty, and living standards in China are rising for millions of people, that's why it can be taken as the Chinese government having delivered what the ordinary Chinese want. On the other hand, the fact that 65% of Americans that think their country is on the wrong track, indicates that the government is unable to deliver what the Americans want. You said: "My point is the individuals interviewed in these sample sizes were totally randomized." Exactly, so the sample size consists of randomized people from the pro-republican camp, the pro-democratic camp, and so on. But the survey results still indicate that 65% of Americans feel that the country is on the wrong track. You said: "For all you know, the WEF could have unknowingly taken the survey from a region the people there disagree with Trump's policies more than in other regions" Didn't you've just said earlier that the people interviewed in these sample sizes were totally randomized? So there are people from all walks of life interviewed, and yet the result was that 65% of Americans think that the country is on the wrong track. You said: "In the PRC there aren't sides when it comes to the government as there is only one," If that's the case, then the survey results should be 100% of Chinese agreeing in the survey, but the fact remains that opposition exists. The fact that 10% of the population said "no the country is not doing well", shows that more than one side exists. You said: "You claimed that the US does not give the citizens what they want. I responded with pointing out The Inflation Act, which gives the citizens what they want." But Biden's Inflation Act doesn't give citizens what they want, I've already explained as such. Even now, the U.S is sending another package of aid to Ukraine, despite the fact that it's one of the most corrupt countries, as well as not being a member of NATO in the first place, yet are Americans fine with this? You said: "The full statement is: "Yes the PRC does give the people what they want, and Yes the US also gives the people what they want". This contradicts with your claim that the PRC is more democratic as the US gives the people what they want as well, with more privilege on top of that." Read my first statement again, I wrote: "However, if a government is able to consistently deliver what the people want (i.e China's) then doesn't it fit the definition of a democracy?" I clearly use the word consistently to indicate that China is more consistent in delivering 90% of what the people want, whereas in the U.S, the 65% that think U.S is on the wrong track indicates that the U.S is not as consistent. You said: "And as I previously pointed out, there is no way to prove that the PRC citizens base their opinions off of their own thought as the government controls all means of information, and even the social media apps PRC citizens can use." Didn't you admit earlier that 10% of China's populous was brave enough to say "no the country is not doing well"? Then why are you claiming that there is no way to prove the that PRC citizens base our opinions off of their own thought, when there are clearly people that disagree? You said: "Twitter is not America, it is separate from what defines America itself." But Trump was the POTUS when his Twitter account was banned, it's a clear indication that censorship exists in America. Trump was tweeting out his disagreement with the results of the 2020 Presidential election, and that's why his account was suspended. And it's not limited to Twitter, many other users with a different view have found their accounts banned on YouTube, Instagram, and other social media sites, yet you're still claiming censorship doesn't exist in America? You said: "Twitter banning Trump does not mean that he is controlled by the one percent." The former POTUS Trump's voice has been silenced by a private company Twitter (i.e the 1%), how is Trump not being controlled by the 1%? Any politician who says something that the 1% do not like to hear may find themselves been banned or censored. Earlier you've even wrote that: "Twitter is owned by an individual, not America." and yet this one individual has the power to silence even the POTUS, so how does this not make U.S a plutocracy? You said: "Twitter is a company, America is a country." Yet this company has the power to control the democratically elected leader of the country, which goes to show how the U.S is clearly a plutocracy, with a government of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%. Earlier, you claim China's media is controlled by the Chinese government, but the U.S media is controlled by private corporations owned by the 1%. Currently, just 5 corporations control roughly 90% of America's media, which is how the 1% maintain their hold over American's citizens access to information.
    1
  17423.  @bartonlee3594  Communism indeed remains the center of China's growth, but like I said earlier, China will most likely fuse elements of the Chinese experience into Marx's vision of communism, resulting in "Communism with Chinese Characteristics" (much like the current "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics"). I know you are being sarcastic, but I mostly agree with your description of the necessary methods undertaken by Mao and other founders who oversaw the modernization of China's military. The Century of Humiliation has imparted lessons to China, that a big country with a weak military (i.e Qing Dynasty Army) will only invite foreign powers to invade, so a big country needs a strong military to act as a deterrent to potential aggressors. Mao wasn't actually supportive of the harsh repression of minority communities. In fact, in 1938, Mao Zedong actually criticized what's known as Han Chauvinism (大汉族主义) which portrayed Han (the ethnic majority of Chinese) as inherently superior to other ethnic minorities. Modern communist party policies actually tend to grant favorable status to ethnic minorities (such as Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchus etc) in education and so on. State control over private companies is necessary. Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why many American monopolies like Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon dominate their respective industries, having eliminated competition from other smaller American firms, possibly stifling innovation through competition in the process. In China, there are anti-monopoly laws, clamping down on anti-competitive practices in Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, etc. This helps "free up space" so that other smaller Chinese companies can emerge and compete with the more established companies, possibly promoting innovation through competition. While Deng Xiaoping's policies have resulted in economic growth for China, it also resulted in growing inequality between the rich and the poor. President Xi's hopes to rectify this problem through "Common Prosperity", by improving infrastructure connecting the wealthy Chinese port cities in the East (i.e Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, etc) with the less-developed land-locked regions in the West (i.e Tibet, Xinjiang), in order to more evenly distribute China's wealth.
    1
  17424.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "A good form of government doesn't have to censor their own people to uphold peace." Let's make one thing very clear. Censorship does exist in the U.S. Even on YouTube alone, accounts that offer a different point of view from the MSM are being demonetized, being shadow-banned, or having their subscriber count frozen, or just outright banning. The fact that Trump had his Twitter account banned, while he was still technically the POTUS at the time of his account being suspended, just goes to show the power the private corporations have over the American media. You said: "Let me ask you this: If we are truly a bad form of government and the people don't get what they want, how has this same system not collapsed or been through a regime change in over 230 years" The U.S election system can perhaps described as a value in a pipe that controls pressure. When thing goes bad in America, the pressure in the pipe builds up to a critical point, until an election is held (which is like turning the value) in order to release the pressure in the pipe. Elections in the U.S exist so that ordinary citizens can "let off steam" and relieve the pressure temporarily before the next build-up. That's how the U.S is able to survive for so long, by presenting the illusion to ordinary Americans that they have freedom of speech and the ability to change their governments, when the fact remains that the government is unable to deliver what the ordinary Americans want.
    1
  17425.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "A good form of government doesn't have to censor their own people to uphold peace." But censorship does exist even in the U.S. On YouTube alone, accounts that offer a different point of view from the MSM are being demonetized or banned. The fact that Trump had his Twitter account suspended, while he was still technically the POTUS at the time of his account being suspended, just goes to show the power that the private corporations have over the American politics. You said: "Let me ask you this: If we are truly a bad form of government and the people don't get what they want, how has this same system not collapsed or been through a regime change in over 230 years" The U.S election system can perhaps described as a value in a pipe that controls pressure. When thing goes bad in America, the pressure in the pipe builds up to a critical point, until an election is held (which is like turning the value) in order to release the pressure in the pipe. Elections in the U.S exist so that ordinary citizens can "let off steam" and relieve the pressure temporarily before the next build-up.
    1
  17426.  @bartonlee3594  "A good form of government doesn't have to censor their own people to uphold peace." Censorship does exist in the U.S. You said: "Let me ask you this: If we are truly a bad form of government and the people don't get what they want, how has this same system not collapsed or been through a regime change in over 230 years" The U.S election system can perhaps described as a value in a pipe that controls pressure. When thing goes bad in America, the pressure in the pipe builds up to a critical point, until an election is held (which is like turning the value) in order to release the pressure in the pipe. Elections in the U.S exist so that ordinary citizens can "let off steam" and relieve the pressure temporarily before the next build-up. That's how the U.S is able to survive for so long, by presenting the illusion to ordinary Americans that they have freedom of speech and the ability to change their governments, when the fact remains that the government is unable to deliver what the ordinary Americans want.
    1
  17427.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou Must disagree with part of that, for this reason. " Censorship does exists in the U.S, the most famous examples are Edward Snowden and Julian Assange. Assange exposed the criminals, yet it was him who was arrested while the criminals have gotten away. And even in the USA, there are certain topics that you cannot speak about. So many times, the comments in the YouTube section have been blocked, even though we know they exist. As for Hu Jintao, like you said, he is at an advanced age of 79, (same age as Biden) and has been seen in increasingly frail health in public in recent years, it's quite possible that such an elderly statesman needed to retire from the meeting halfway due to health reasons. The fact that Hu Jintao sat directly next to President Xi seems to indicate that there is no particular resentment between the two men. Hu Jintao attempting to reach for a document but prevented from doing so by Xi, could have simply been Xi telling Hu "Take it easy. Go and rest, I've got this covered." Hu Jintao managed a moment's stubbornness, before finally giving in and leaving the hall to go rest.
    1
  17428.  @bartonlee3594  Hu Jintao is at an advanced age at 79 years (same age as Joe Biden) and is in frail health. Also, Hu had to be escorted to his chair in the People's Hall just as he needed to be escorted out. Hu Jintao also looked dazed at the Party Congress, and President Xi even had to gently remind Hu to sit down afterwards. Also Hu was seated directly next to Xi in the Party congress, so isn't this a show of respect from Xi to Hu?
    1
  17429. American politicians make promise then get elected. Chinese politicians fulfil promises then get elected.
    1
  17430. US politicians make promise to get elected. Chinese politicians fulfil promise to get elected.
    1
  17431.  @plaguedoc7727  以前没出国的时候，听到国外的中餐不好吃肯定不相信了。出国了就知道事实的确如此。
    1
  17432.  @Brolaeggerdk  Photographs and videos show that the rocket part faces the northeast, which means that the missile may have arrived from the southwest, which is the direction of Ukrainian controlled territory such as Dobropillia. So it's possible that this attack on Kramatorsk was orchestrated by Ukrainian forces themselves.
    1
  17433. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  17434. Well, then you'll have one foot on a rising ship, and another foot on a sinking ship.
    1
  17435. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  17436. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17437. Even Taiwan's own constitution acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17438.  @nakiflo  There are lots of divisions that are keeping American families and communities apart. Abortion vs anti-abortion. Trump supporters vs anti-Trump people. Vexers and anti-vexers. Pro-firearms and anti-firearms. Left Wing vs Right Wing. These forces are tearing apart the fabric of American society.
    1
  17439.  @Darcon123  Many Westerners are listening to only one side of events. People like Cyrus are helping interpret events from an alternative point of view.
    1
  17440.  @maxwellmaggio7445  So stating Shinzo Abe's entire political career is considered complaining in your eyes?
    1
  17441.  @MarkYeung1  The problem lies in the ideology of Western democracy itself, not just America. Look at India, the world's largest democracy and they aren't doing as well as China, so perhaps this is an indication that not all countries have to adopt Western brand of democracy to be successful, and China is living proof of this. Otherwise, China would possibly turn out like India.
    1
  17442.  @abbotsful  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  17443.  @MarkYeung1  Whoever says that Taiwan has to abandon democracy and accept one party totalitarian rule? President Xi Jinping actually offered to extend the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy to include Taiwan, allowing Taiwan to retain their democratic system and for the mainland to keep the ours. Yet Taiwan has rejected this offer and hasn't offered any counter-proposals.
    1
  17444.  @johanhirte9661  Tibet being part of China is fundamentally different from Western definition of colonialism. Here's Martin Jacques explaining how China never invade nor colonize other countries or territories. Video: China never invade nor colonize other countries or territories. Martin Jacques 中国从不入侵也从不殖民 youtu.be/XDX8nQIEhJY
    1
  17445.  @johanhirte9661  Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Criticism
    1
  17446.  @johanhirte9661  Taken from above source: In his 1991 autobiography Freedom in Exile, the 14th Dalai Lama criticized the CIA for supporting the Tibetan independence movement "not because they (the CIA) cared about Tibetan independence, but as part of their worldwide efforts to destabilize all communist governments". In 1999, the Dalai Lama suggested that the CIA Tibetan program had been harmful to Tibet because it primarily served American interests, claiming "once the American policy toward China changed, they stopped their help ... The Americans had a different agenda from the Tibetans." During the Tibetan program's period of activity, some of its largest contributions to the CIA's interests in the region came in the form of keeping the Chinese occupied with resistance, never actually producing a mass uprising establishing independence for Tibet from Beijing. The program also produced a trove of army documents that Tibetan insurgents seized from the Chinese and turned over to the CIA in 1961 in what has been referred to as "one of the greatest intelligence successes of the Cold War". The CIA faced criticism for breaking promises regarding declassification, including some documentation regarding the support of Tibetan guerilla fighters in the 1950s until the early 1960s.
    1
  17447.  @johanhirte9661  "No matter as how bad Chinese propaganda paints the Lama." We have actual proof of 14th Dalai Lama receiving money from the CIA (as revealed in the declassified CIA files) to fund separatist activities in Tibet, and at the end of the day, the Americans abandoned their tool shortly after President Nixon visited China, and they have since stopped caring about the so-called independence of Tibet. Today, the United States recognizes Tibet as part of China, so does Canada, Australia, UK, France, Germany, India, Japan. And I have previously stated that about being forced to sign that agreement, according to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid. According to Tibetologist Melvyn Goldstein: Their feeling of duress derives from the general Chinese threat to use military force again in Central Tibet if an agreement was not concluded. However, according to international law, this does not invalidate an agreement. So long as there is no physical violence against the signatories, an agreement is valid - Tibetologist Melvyn Goldstein. Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement#Repudiation_of_the_agreement
    1
  17448.  @johanhirte9661  Martin Jacques has already elaborated in the video that China never invade nor colonize other countries or territories. Video:youtu.be/XDX8nQIEhJY Tibet was part of China since over 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated them into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu's did a similar thing with Tibet during the Qing Dynasty of China. Xinjiang was part of China since Han Dynasty (200 BC) and it was known as Xiyu (西域). Between the 2nd century BCE and 2nd century CE the Han Empire established the Protectorate of the Western Regions or Xiyu Protectorate (西域都護府) and the Western Regions during the Tang era were known as Qixi (磧西).
    1
  17449.  @johanhirte9661  And the Yuan (元) Dynasty was a Chinese dynasty, as the Mongolian Kublai Khan (grandson of Genghis) abandoned his babaric nomadic ways and adopted Chinese culture and language, living in a permanent housing in the palace as the Emperor of Yuan Dynasty China (whereas his grandfather Genghis purportedly never slept under a permanent roof his entire nomadic life). And Tibet was made part of the Yuan Dynasty. Tibet was part of Ming (明) Dynasty as the Tibetan leaders had their titles bestowed upon them by the Ming Court. For example the 3rd Dalai Lama was bestowed the right to rule Tibet by the Ming Prince of Shunyi. And in 1720, the Manchu leaders of the Qing (清) dynasty sent an expedition army to Tibet in response to the occupation of Tibet by the forces of the Dzungar Khanate, together with Tibetan forces under Polhanas of Tsang and Kangchennas, the governor of Western Tibet, they expelled the Dzungars from Tibet in 1720. Xinjiang was part of China before even Jesus Christ himself was born, during the Han (汉) Dynasty (200BC) and where was known as Xiyu (西域). Xinjiang had never been an independent country, even the so-called "East Turkestan" is a fake name coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists (including Nikita Bichurin) to replace another Western term, Chinese Turkestan. So historically, there was never any historical country called "East Turkestan". As for different languages, Tibetan language is part of the Sino-Tibetan family of languages, which is a family of more than 400 languages, second only to Indo-European in number of native speakers, and includes the vast majority of the 1.4 billion native speakers of Chinese languages, Burmese (33 million) and the Tibetic languages (six million).
    1
  17450.  @johanhirte9661  You said: "I don’t even say that these regions are not a part of China now." So does that mean you agree that Tibet and Xinjiang are part of China now? Then we are in agreement that those regions are part of China today, even USA acknowledges Tibet and Xinjiang as part of China, so does UK, France, Germany, Canada, Australia, etc. The Philippines 🇵🇭 have even been colonized by the Americans. The Americans had initially promised Philippines independence if they help them fight the Spanish. But after the Spanish surrendered, the Americans broke their promise and took the Philippines for themselves, resulting in the American-Philippine War in which 4,000 American soldiers died, but 20,000 Filipino soldiers died and a 250,000 Filipino civilians died. In the aftermath, Philippines became an American colony. Video: The Philippine American War-The Shocking Truth youtu.be/bN2wrZGcs8s You said: "As colonies and China is till today a colonial power which is suppressing other countries and take over control of their territory." Which other country has been suppressed by China? We know that Tibet and Xinjiang are historically part of China and those states independence has not been recognized. And if you want to bring up Taiwan, even Taiwan's constitution says that Taiwan is part of China. You said: "And Ur Interview with this guy doesn’t change that even a bit." Martin Jacques is a British journalist, editor, academic, political commentator and author, and he knows Chinese history far more intimately than most Westerners. If you disregard his views, then what make you dispute his claim that China never invade nor colonize other countries or territories?
    1
  17451. People of Taiwan need to wake up and realise that USA care absolutely nothing for Taiwan's interest, USA seeks to drive a wedge between Taiwan and the mainland and divide China to weaken our country, using Taiwan as a pawn against the homeland. In 2014, Russia had military intervention in Crimea and annexed it from Ukraine and all Washington did was impose sanctions on Moscow that's all. No US - Russia War. So what makes people of Taiwan think USA will go to war with mainland China over Taiwan?
    1
  17452. @ForrestSCS If China was really so weak, then why is America trying to divide China by bringing up Hong Kong, Xinjiang and Taiwan issues? If China is weak, then USA shouldn't care about China isn't it?
    1
  17453. @ForrestSCS The United States doesn't care about Taiwan, they're using Taiwan as a pawn to contain China's rise that's all, because it's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising, so the USA is desperately trying to reverse the inevitable and trying to maintain their global hegemony.
    1
  17454. @ForrestSCS Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western journalists predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for 31 years already?
    1
  17455. @ForrestSCS If you want to look at history, China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. Because this is what China's 5,000 years of history is telling us, that China functions best under a strong central government, like the Emperor and the Imperial Court of old. China's current authoritarian political closely emulates the ancient imperial system under President Xi Jinping and the Communist Party of China. And go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a Map of all the territory Taiwan claims (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  17456. @ForrestSCS You claim Taiwan "won their independence" then why is that Taiwan cannot join the United Nations and the World Health Organization? Since you claim it's independent, then where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence, you tell me? Unless there's something clearly controlling Taiwan and preventing them from joining UN or WHO, or declaring independence. You're the one who brought up history, and I'm telling that throughout China's 5,000 years of history, China has always been under the authoritarian central government of Emperors and the Imperial Court. This is what history is telling us, that authoritarian forms of government work for China, then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    1
  17457. China produces more STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) than any other in the world, it's no wonder that China is expected to start leading in this fields.
    1
  17458. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17459. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  17460. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17461.  @mmm6214  Wafer fabrication requires copious amounts of water (Taiwan's semiconductor fab was badly hit by drought) and yet the US is building those wafer fabs in Arizona of all place?
    1
  17462. Many in China are optimistic and look forward to a bright future. Many in the West are increasingly pessimistic and have a gloomy view of the future.
    1
  17463. Russia has yet to call upon the services of their most invincible soldier, General Winter, in this special military operation. Western European countries are woefully unprepared for the arrival of Winter, and this might bring victory for the Russians.
    1
  17464. +General S. Patton Every country have people being persecuted of some sort. Even in USA, Wikileaks founder and whistleblower, Edward Snowden, has become US fugitive and seek asylum with Russia.
    1
  17465. +Mystic_Rose I have previously covered the topic of working women, in that by working, they have less time to spend with their kids back home (that's why working dads often have to sacrifice family time for work, sad truth). Its possible that a husband can become sick and unable to work, but if he can still take care of the kids back home, then nothing wrong with women seeking work to support her family. And also, men themselves may not like women at the workplace too. Just saying... If one of the partners dies, there's also the possibility of remarriage or the extended family helping take care of the children.
    1
  17466. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17467. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17468. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17469. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17470. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17471.  @michaelkatz275  The so-called "debt-trap" diplomacy by China has been debunked by experts as a myth. According to The Atlantic, research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country, much less the port of Hambantota.
    1
  17472.  @michaelkatz275  The so-called "debt-trap" diplomacy by China has been debunked by experts as a myth. Research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country, much less the port of Hambantota.
    1
  17473.  @yvieanaysha5384  According to The Times article entitled: France fights terror with camps for re-education France will send radicalised Islamists to re-education centres under a €40 million plan to tackle extremism, which the prime minister says is the biggest threat to the nation since Hitler. The suspects will be taught their patriotic duties and forced to undergo psychological treatment in an attempt to counter jihadist indoctrination.
    1
  17474.  @sachinkadam2935  I quote sources to support my arguments, why not attempt to refute my points instead of claiming that Chinese don't know actual truths?
    1
  17475. To them, China fits into the whole narrative of Red Scare (fear of communism) and Yellow Peril (fear of being overrun by Asians).
    1
  17476.  @maicholaa7482  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    1
  17477.  @maicholaa7482  China has even launched space stations into orbit, the world's 3rd to do so after USA and USSR. China's first prototype space station, Tiangong-1 was launched in 2011, followed by Tiangong-2 in 2016. There was even a "space lecture" where Chinese taikonaut in space gave a lecture to her students on the ground from onboard Tiangong-1, demonstrating simple micro-gravity experiments in space. Video: Chinese teacher in space gives lecture to her students on the ground below youtu.be/OUAuZnpoZ58 By doing this, we are showing our kids (and future generations of Chinese) that China is both ancient civilization as well as a modern space nation, capable of achieving equally impressive feats as the Westerners in space. China is no longer the sick man of Asia, in fact, China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, and India have not launched space stations of their own into orbit.
    1
  17478.  @maicholaa7482  In 2016, China launched world's 1st quantum satellite, named Micius, (墨子) into orbit and demonstrated that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere, smashing the previous record held on Earth. Video: China's Quantum satellite achieves 'spooky action' at record distance youtube.com/watch?v=4QlcKuxDGrs Quantum entanglement (in a nutshell) is when two subatomic particles become an "entangled pair", able to influence their quantum states (won't go into detail here) seemingly regardless of the distance involved. One particle could be on the surface of the Earth, and the other on the surface of the Moon, and theoretically, they can still influence each other with no information (known to current science) passing in between them. The longest record for quantum entanglement on Earth is 143 km in at experiment in the Canary Islands. But China has allowed two stations (Delingha and Lijiang station) located 1200 km apart to communicate directly, through our quantum satellite, thus breaking the previous record and showcasing that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere. And as far as I know, this is a world first, and China is the first to launch quantum satellite into space.
    1
  17479.  @maicholaa7482  China has even landed on the Moon. In 2013, China landed our very own lunar spacecraft and lunar rover (Chang'e 3 嫦娥-3 and Yutu 玉兔 "Jade Rabbit") on the Moon, making China the world's 3rd nation to make a soft-landing on Earth's celestial neighbor. Source: China Lands On The Moon space.com/23968-china-moon-rover-historic-lunar-landing.html In October 2015, the Jade Rabbit set the record for the longest operational period for a rover on the Moon. The rover's ground penetrating radar found evidence of at least 9 distinct rock layers. Video: China moon landing video: 'Jade Rabbit' rover soft-lands on lunar surface youtube.com/watch?v=XpAwmVPT758 Through this, China is showing that Chinese people are capable of achieving equally impressive feats as Westerners in space.
    1
  17480.  @maicholaa7482  China is the world's first to land on the far side of the Moon. China's Chang'e-4 (嫦娥四号) achieved the first soft landing on the far side of the Moon, on 3 January 2019, using a relay satellite Queqiao (鹊桥 'Bridge of Magpies') Video: China is the First to land on the Dark Side of the Moon youtu.be/JWlxoU5DpLk The Chinese lunar rover Yutu-2 (玉兔二号 'Jade Rabbit 2') explored the Von Kármán crater on the Moon's far side, and even conducted experiments on the Moon such as growing cotton seeds on the Moon (first biological matter to be grown on the Moon) Video: Chinese space mission brings first seeds to life on moon’s surface youtu.be/Zu-G-MncYaw Through this, we are showing that we Chinese people are just as capable as Westerners in space achievements, and that we are also pioneers in space exploration. Why should Chinese people consider ourselves inferior to Westerners? We need to shrug off this misconception, else Chinese (and other Asians) will always be behind Westerners in achievements if our mindsets don't change.
    1
  17481.  @maicholaa7482  China successfully landed the Chang’e 5 probe on the moon’s surface on December 1, 2020. The probe’s moon lander and ascender vehicle touched down near the peak of Mons Rümker, a mountain in the Oceanus Procellarum region of the moon. Video: China successfully lands Chang’e 5 probe on moon to collect lunar samples youtu.be/bjnKxSAwaYw
    1
  17482. Singapore's ports actually hosts the US Aircraft Carriers that sail towards the South China Sea and increase tensions in that area.
    1
  17483.  @0shadowgrace0  "神州 Shenzhou are you for real? she claimed sexual assult and no one saw her for weeks." Where's the claims of sexual assault? I read Peng Shuai's post (you can find the full translation on Reddit) and she previously had a tumultuous on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several years in fact, but where are the allegations of sexual assault? On 17 November, Peng Shuai wrote an email to WTA claiming that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    1
  17484.  @hanhdoan9101  "神州 Shenzhou if she wanted personal privacy, why she post a multi-page essay on Weibo, a PUBLIC social media platform?" Maybe she wasn't thinking straight at that time of her post (or she could have been intoxicated at that time) and it's possible that she deleted the post afterwards after realizing her mistake. If you read Peng Shuai's post (you can find the full translation on Reddit) she was very emotional during her post (some users remarked she's a little childish) and while she described in detail her previous personal affair with a much older man, there are no allegations of sexual assault in her post (point them out to me if you can). Now that her previous affair has been revealed, Peng Shuai is probably trying to keep a low profile for a while and avoid the public eye until this all blows over. She has expressed her desire for personal privacy on video call with IOC, but it's just that the WTA is behaving kinda like the paparazzi and trying to pry into her private affairs, instead of respecting her wish for privacy.
    1
  17485.  @hanhdoan9101  "You brought me to your house and forced me and you to have relations." That's not an allegation of sexual assault, the full text is 带我去你 家逼我和你发生关系 and it means "take me to your house and forced a relationship between us." but it's not an allegation of sexual assault. 发生关系 just means have a relationship it doesn't necessarily translate to forced to have sex. And why is it inconceivable to you that Peng Shuai wants to keep a low profile after her previous relationship with a much older man has been revealed? She has expressed a desire for privacy in a video call with IOC, but the WTA are behaving like paparazzi and trying to dig up details of her private life for all the world to see.
    1
  17486.  @strnglhld  "I'll wait for your carefully crafted answer." See my answer above. 逼我和你发生关系 just means force a relationship between me and you, it's not an allegation of sexual assault. But the WTA twisted her words and she has wrote a email to WTA saying that the allegations of sexual assault were not true and she critized the WTA for releasing unverified information without her consent.
    1
  17487.  @strnglhld  "As would anyone when recounting a rape," There's information in Peng Shuai's post that she consented to the relationship and the whole affair spanned at least 3 years, before they broke up, so isn't it possible that she was emotional because of her failed relationship with a much older man? If you read Peng Shuai's translated post on Reddit, there's even people claiming where are the allegations of sexual assault?
    1
  17488.  @hanhdoan9101  1) If you read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) she actually consented to the affair. She had known Zhang Gaoli before he become vice premier at least 7 years since 2012 and this is what she wrote: "You said in those seven years, you never forgot about me, and you will treat me well etc... I was terrified and anxious. Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well." So while the relationship was forced, the sex was consensual and she agreed, so where are the allegations of sexual assault? 2) I've previously said that maybe she wasn't thinking straight at the time of her post (or perhaps she was intoxicated during the time of her posting) so it's possible she deleted her post after she realized what she has done. Under traditional Chinese mindset, having am affair with a much older man is considered embarrassing in nature, and why is it inconceivable to you that Peng Shuai want's to lay low for a while, until this whole issue blows over? Given how shameful it is to have her previous affair exposed, she has expressed her desire for privacy, but the WTA doesn't want to honor her wishes for privacy. 3) What's wrong with another person sharing the same opinion as me? So many people already jump to conclusions that Peng Shuai is missing (when we have footage of her attending dinners and awards ceremonies for kid athletes and even meeting Yao Ming) or that she is being coerced without even bothering to read Peng Shuai's post itself.
    1
  17489.  @hanhdoan9101  "神州 Shenzhou You literally said "she was forced to have a relationship with him" and also said "she consented to the affair." Those are two contradictory statements." That's why Peng Shuai was emotional in her post, and while she admits that the relationship was forced, she eventually consented to the affair and agreed to have sex (it's all in her post like I quoted earlier). But what is evident was that there was no allegations of sexual assault in her post (point it out if you can) and that 发生关系 just means have a relationship. That's where the misunderstanding arouse from. "Besides all these translation run-a-round is pointless because it doesn't change my opinion (or WTA's or the general public consensus) of what happened." If your opinion was already formed based on faulty data/translation, then why refuse to change your opinion, given that the basis for your allegations of sexual assault are shoddy? Nowhere in Peng Shuai's post did she claim sexual assault, but the WTA is deliberately politicizing the issue in an attempt to get more countries to consider boycotting the 2022 Olympic Games in Beijing, that's the motive behind WTA pushing the unproven claims of sexual assault. "Here is what happened: - The government noticed traction on the post on Weibo and took it down" Or it's possible she took down the post herself, if she realized what she has done. "- Peng all of a sudden disappeared (and no don't tell me she was embarassed and wants privacy for the 1,000th time)" Those were her very words. Peng Shuai expressed a desire for personal privacy during the video call with IOC, and now she has come out and reiterated her desire for privacy on video here. "- The government then staged all these photoshoots to make it look like she is happy and free (and don't try to tell me these are real. She is being forced and it's so obvious. It doesn't matter what we see in front of the camera. We know what's happening behind the camera)" This is your claim, then do you have evidence that the government staged all these photoshoots to make it look like she is happy and free? Do you have evidence that this are not real? I mean, I find it amusing that you refuse to believe evidence of Peng Shuai's very own words (quoted from her post, and from photoshoots of her attending dinners and awards ceremonies) but you readily believe that those photoshoots are staged without proof.
    1
  17490.  @hanhdoan9101  "Dr. Wenliang discovered covid and made an announcement about it, and then forced to retract his statement by the officials and accused of spreading rumors" Dr Li Wenliang's announcement was on 30th Dec 2019, and China had reported the emergence a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019 to the World Health Organization (just 1 day after Dr Li's announcement). By 5th January 2020, China had isolated and identified the coronavirus strain out of millions, and by 12th Jan 2020, China had sequenced Covid-19 genome and shared the information with WHO. So how is this evidence of China covering up whistleblowers when Dr Li's announcement was only 1 day earlier (30th Dec 2019) than when China reported the novel coronavirus to the WHO on 31st Dec 2019? China had shared any information gleamed about Covid-19 to the WHO, but many Western countries just ignored the warnings from China that's all, and they are trying to blame their own catastrophic handling of Covid-19 on China that's all. "It is completely sensible to doubt the authenticity of these photos of Peng. Not to mention in this video her eyes kept veering the right as she is reading from a script. It doesn't take a genius to conclude what is happening here." It's entirely possible that Peng Shuai was reading off a teleprompter positioned to the side. But again, wheres the evidence that the government stages these photoshoots of Peng Shuai attending dinners, award ceremonies for kid athletes and even talking to Yao Ming? And it doesn't change the fact that there are no allegations of sexual assault in Peng Shuai's post, and that although the relationship was initially forced, the sex was consensual in the end (as I pointed out in her post). Peng Shuai has repeatedly expressed her desire for personal privacy, in the video call with IOC and here in public, and these are her very words, not mine. Again, why is it you refuse to believe the evidence presented that there are no allegations of sexual assault, and that Peng Shuai is fine, attending public events, and wishes for privacy, while you grasp at straws about the photoshoots being staged by the government without proof?
    1
  17491.  @hanhdoan9101  Because Dr Li Wenliang's statement was "There are 7 confirmed cases of SARS at Huanan Seafood Market." (华南水果海鲜市场确诊了7例SARS), so he merely signed a form agreeing not to spread unproven rumours that's all, and Dr Li returned to work the next day. Actually, if you read Dr Li's post, he didn't intend to be a whistleblower, he wrote: "Don't circulate the information outside of this group, tell your family and loved ones to take precautions." (大家不要外传 让家人情人注意防范) But someone took screenshot of his private WeChat post and uploaded it to Chinese social media and that's why the authoritaries were called in to curb the spread of unproven rumours that's all. And it doesn't change the fact that while his post was on 30th Dec 2019, China had reported to the WHO of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019, the day after. "And no one cares about dinners, award ceremonies for kid athletes and no one cares about Yao Ming." I've been reading your posts and it's apparent that you just dismiss anything that doesn't support your claim, and just blindly grasp at straws that these photoshoots are staged by the government without evidence. I'm pointing out evidence that Peng Shuai is fine and attending dinners, etc but you just dismiss them as staged by the government without proof, then aren't you the one being unreasonably biased against China that's all? I mean you failed to point out Peng Shuai's claims of sexual assault in her post, I've pointed out that the sex was consensual (in her post) then what is your basis for your claims of sexual assault occurring? Then you try to switch topic to Dr Li, even though that case has nothing to do with Peng Shuai, because you're unable to produce evidence of sexual assault. This is the fallacy of false equivalence where you bring up unrelated topics, just today compare apples to oranges.
    1
  17492.  @hanhdoan9101  "神州 Shenzhou You know that I can just Google Dr. Li's story and see the complete details of his story" Then earlier why'd you ask me "神州 Shenzhou Can you explain to me why then was he summoned to the Public Security Bureau..."? I mean, you're the one asking me to explain it after all, and that's exactly what I did. "...rather than read your watered-down version right?" Watered-down? I literally quoted his exact words (even in Chinese no less) which Western media would give you the exact words Dr Li said? And I even cited his reluctance to circulate the information outside of his WeChat group (even in Chinese no less) you think Western MSM will quote that? In fact, it's more likely the opposite is true; that you'll get a more watered-down version of Dr Li's story from Western MSM, rather that the exact details I described. "And to remind you why I brought up his story. There is a common thread between Dr. Li and Peng. Both live in communist China that controls media and officials use forceful tactics to control people's behaviors," That's as common as all 1.4 billion people that live in China share, what's the point of you bringing up this thread? And your really think the Chinese government can control all 1.4 billion people in China? " Of course there is no evidence of Peng's photos being staged... So in this case we are probably not going to get the evidence that China is hiding." So where's this evidence that China is hiding evidence? This is the fear and paranoia that's gripping the Western countries, it's like the Red Scare (fear of communism) and *Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) all over again, where people are suspicious of Chinese without proof. "You think evidence is the only obstacle that is keeping us from believing the photos are staged?" No, I'm pointing out that you don't have evidence of those photos being staged by the government, then why jump to conclusions without proof? "Obviously WTA understands that too, therefore not being fooled by these predictable attempts. But who needs evidence when you have such obvious signs in front of you." The 2022 Beijing Olympics is coming up next year, so the WTA is trying to politicize sports in order to create ammunition for other countries to continue maligning China and to consider boycotting the 2022 Beijing Olympics. If the WTA truly cared about Peng Shuai, then they would respect her wish for privacy, instead of demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for the world to see. And what "obvious signs in front of you" are you talking about? You have already admitted that you have no evidence that those photoshoots were staged by the government.
    1
  17493.  @hanhdoan9101  You said: "And I've read the translation where she stated she was forced to have sex with him." Where is it? This is what you quoted from earlier: "神州 Shenzhou That afternoon I didn't give my consent and couldn't stop crying," she wrote. "You brought me to your house and forced me and you to have relations."" But where's the allegations that she was forced to have sex with him? I previously quoted her words from her post: "You said in those seven years, you never forgot about me, and you will treat me well etc... I was terrified and anxious. Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well." So it turns out that the sex was consensual so where is the part where you claim she was forced to have sex with him? That's why Peng Shuai has denied the allegations of sexual assault, because there aren't any in her post. "I wouldn't be surprised if officials posted on Reddit either with that specific translation where she was only forced into a relationship but consent to sex." Again, it's like every piece of evidence that goes against your narrative is automatically assumed to be staged/faked by the government, then where does this fear and paranoia come from? Do you have evidence that officials posted that specific translation on Reddit? "Just so you know, America social media is different than China social media. There are places on the internet you haven't combed through yet." Last I checked, Reddit is an American social news aggregation, web content rating, and discussion website, so yeah, it certainly is different. Also, have you combed through Chinese social media like WeChat, Weibo, Tencent QQ, Douban, Zhihu, Youku, DouYin, Toutiao, Meituan Dianping, and so on? "And you think I'm grasping for straws? What do I have to benefit from proving that Peng was assualted, kidnapped, and forced to make these videos?" You benefit from your continued maligning of China, even though you have no evidence of your claims, that's why you're grasping at straws, claiming the photoshoots are staged by the government (without proof) and now even presuming the Reddit translation was by officials (without proof). It's like you're just "conclusion shopping" where you already deemed China guilty, and just shop for evidence that supports your conclusion, all the while dismissing the mountain of evidence (i.e translations of her posts, footage of her attending dinners, etc) that goes against your narrative as faked.
    1
  17494.  @hanhdoan9101  "神州 Shenzhou I asked you explain Dr. Li's story so I can gauge how you explain it. Like I expected, you simplified" I literally gave you his words in Chinese and explained the reasoning behind it, because unproven rumors can cause panic and misinformation, especially in the medical industry. "And I saw in WESTERN MEDIA that he was reluctant to let it circulate outside Wechat because obviously he didn't want authorities to know that he knew" Which Western Media says he was reluctant to let it circulate outside Wechat because obviously he didn't want authorities to know that he knew? "And you are asking me what was the point of bringing up this common thread between Dr. Li and Peng?" Because this "common thread" is pointless, I mean, are you saying all 1.4 billion people of China share this common thread? Have you actually been to China and seen what life is really like here for yourself? "And China is trying to control all their citizens, why else will they have officials scrolling through social media, blocking keywords, taking down posts and threatening people to reverse their statements." If China was really trying to control all it's citizens, then why are Chinese people free to travel overseas for work, study or play? I mean, before 2019, everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending money on your economy. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with international Chinese students, studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese companies are expanding overseas, and Chinese investors are buying up land and property in other parts of the world, so what makes you think the government controls all it's citizens? "And where is the evidence that China is hiding evidence? I'll tell you what it is: resistance to letting Peng met with WTA," Peng Shuai has previously sent emails to the WTA, she sent one email to WTA on Nov 17, claiming that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent. "...clumsy attempts to show pictures and videos of her looking happy and safe, extremely poor acting on the part of the coach in the dinner video..." Again, since you can't prove that these photos and videos are staged, then it's just your own negative speculation without evidence that's all. I mean, "extremely poor acting"? That implies it was real behavior that's not being staged isn't it? "Peng looking off to the right of the camera as if she was reading a script. Since when do people need prompter to answer a simple question? When your friend asks you how you are, do you read off a notecard in front of you, "yes I am doing fine."" Maybe she's deep in thought and considering her response to the question, that's why she looked off to the side? Again, without evidence, why are you jumping to conclusions that she's reading off a script without proof? "Even though they are not evidence that directly proves the photos are staged, they are still suspicious activity that raises concern and doubt." Here's Singaporean newspaper Lianhe Zaobao reporter interviewing Peng Shuai at a cross-country skiing event in Shanghai. Peng Shuai denied she had made an accusation, saying in Chinese "I have never said or written that anyone has sexually assaulted me, I have to clearly stress this point", and that there had been misunderstandings about her post on Weibo. She confirmed she had written to the WTA denying making an allegation of assault. https://youtu.be/ZF9Owb9uSOE
    1
  17495.  @hanhdoan9101  "are you not familiar with those cases where a husband is suspected of murdering his wife but there was no evidence (fingerprints, weapons, etc) so he is acquitted of charges," So under Western law, there is a presumption of innocence where suspect is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Then why are you seemingly automatically assuming that the suspect is guilty when there's no evidence of the person's alleged crime? Peng Shuai has repeatedly denied the accusations of sexual assault (in her post, in her email to WTA, and now in that interview with Singaporean newspaper Lianhe Zaobao) then why jump to conclusions without proof? "So walk me through this claim that WTA is trying to politicize sports. Let's say Peng Shuai never posted anything on Weibo. So if WTA can't use this case, what else would they have done to politicize sports?" They might have found some other way to demonize China by picking up on another story and exaggerating it like they did with Peng Shuai. It's a hypothetical example by you that's all. "Or another option is, even if they met with Peng and it turns out that everything was true about the assault, what would WTA's next step be specifically with Peng that will directly lead to them politicizing sports?" Everything true about the assault as in Peng Shuai's denial of sexual assault or that that sexual assault really happened? "Yes I agree she admitted their affair and they had consensual sex PREVIOUSLY. But previous consensual sex doesn't prevent forced sex in the future." No, read again the translation by Peng Shuai, she had sex with him seven years ago, as well as after that, and both times were consensual, so what allegations of sexual assault are you talking about? "She said forced relations (forced sex) so even though they had consensual sex before, she said he forced her into sex this one time and yes forced sex is assault." Forced relations is not the same as forced sex, and where did she ever said he forced her into sex? Could you specifically quote me her words saying so? Because what Peng Shuai's post said is that the sex was consensual, she wrote: "Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you." Here's a video explanation of Peng Shuai's post and the translation by someone who knows Chinese: youtu.be/cvTUvvePJYg "And you missed my point about American vs Chinese social media. I mentioned that there are ways news is spread in America where Chinese officials cannot infiltrate and pretend to be a common citizen and make a post or take down posts like they do on Weibo." Well, then since Reddit is an American platform, then Chinese officials cannot infiltrate it and post that specific translation isn't it? "Saying Reddit is an American platform and rattling off that list of Chinese social media platforms doesn't support anything in this" But you just confirmed that Chinese officials cannot infiltrate American social media and since Reddit is an American platform, then the idea of Chinese officials infiltrating Reddit and post that specific translation is highly unlikely isn't it? As for the list of Chinese social media platforms, I've been on them, have you? Then why did you claim that "There are places on the internet you haven't combed through yet." when apparently you never been on Chinese social media? "And "I benefit from continue maligning of China?" You didn't answer my question. How am I benefitting?" You are benefiting by feeding your anti-China sentiment (and those surrounding you) by promoting falsehoods to people without any basis or any evidence. By constantly maligning China, you discourage other people from visiting China and finding out what life is really like here, and continuing this spreading this distrust of China. Once again, it's because you are "conclusion shopping." You want to arrive at a certain negative conclusion of China, so you disregard any evidence that goes against your narrative or try to twist them to suit your conclusion that's all.
    1
  17496.  @hanhdoan9101  "神州 Shenzhou If you are just going to dodge the question as to why you didn't include threat and coercion regarding Dr. Li then we are finished with this topic." I don't even know why we are talking about this topic at all when it has nothing to do with Peng Shuai. How do you even prove that Dr Li was threatened and coerced? And from the fact that he didn't want to circulate the information, it's possible that this was his intention all along, not to spread the information, but just that someone took screenshot of his post and uploaded it to social media. "And why should I tell you which western media it is?" So I take it that no Western media said such a thing? The funny thing is that you have no qualms dodging questions, yet you complain about me supposedly doing the same. "I have friends who live in China and each time they come visit in the States, they tell me it sucks to have to find ways to discuss forbidden topics but they manage to find ways to do it." Congratulations, you've just proven that China cannot control all 1.4 billion citizens and that people manage to find ways to do it. "And extremely poor acting DOES NOT imply real behavior. How did you even come up with that? Do you even know what acting is?" Acting is when something is staged, and poor acting implies that it wasn't staged after all, and it's possibly the real deal. "He is doing a poor job of trying to convince viewers that this video is recent therefore trying to disprove that Peng wasn't locked up somewhere." That means that he's a poor actor and it's adds credence to the possibility that the event wasn't staged. And do you even have evidence that Peng Shuai was locked up somewhere in the first place? Otherwise without evidence, why jump to conclusions without proof? "And why are you asking me questions I already gave you answers to?" Weren't you also asking me questions in which I already gave you answers to? "A suspect that has a history of violence of abuse towards his wife and one day his wife suddenly dies makes him look suspicious" So do you have evidence of Zhang Gaoli having a history of sexual assault? Even you claimed that seven years ago, the sex was consensual (you said: "Yes I agree she admitted their affair and they had consensual sex PREVIOUSLY.") that means Zhang doesn't have a history of sexual assault, so why is he even suspicious in the first place then? Otherwise, what's the point of your analogy, other than the fact that Western law has the presumption of innocence, where a suspect is innocent until proven guilty? Since you have no evidence of sexual assault, then are you seemingly jumping to conclusions that Zhang is guilty without proof? "The video interview looked shady" How was it shady? Was it shot in poor lighting or something? "And you can't prove Peng wrote those emails it could've been a government official." Peng Shuai has admitted that she wrote those emails to WTA Simon Steve in Chinese, (video: youtu.be/ZF9Owb9uSOE?t=150 ) and as for the English version, her English wasn't good enough to translate her words from Chinese into English. She also said the English version's meaning is not different from the one she wrote the Mr Simon personally and the message was in accordance with her own wishes. "And America is trying to demonize China?" Haven't you seen the sheer amount of American anti-China propaganda? I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, and I was appalled at the widespread anti-China propaganda in the West. Whenever I talk to locals and try to bring up China's positive achievements under the communist party, many Westerners (but not all) just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill, and some even took it a step further and told me to "Go back to China if you like it there!". And that's in spite of many Westerners never actually setting foot in China and seeing what life is like here for themselves. "And forced relation in her wording was forced sex. I saw the translation, and it was verbally translated to me. I'm not going to send it to you" Forced relations is not the same as forced sex, so you've been seemingly fed the wrong translation. And Peng Shuai eventually consented to the sex (as I quoted previously) and even in the video I linked earlier, Peng Shuai denies the allegations of sexual assault. "And I never said Chinese officials can't infiltrate Reddit. When did I say that?" You said that there are ways news is spread in America where Chinese officials cannot infiltrate and since Reddit is an American platform, then you're saying Chinese officials can't infiltrate Reddit then. "But there are other platforms used that they can't access...And that's the corner of Western media you haven't combed" What's these other platforms that you claim Chinese officials haven combed? On the other hand, have you actually been onto Chinese social media websites like I previously mentioned? "And you think my intention is to stop people from traveling to China?" Because that's what you're doing by promoting falsehoods to people without any basis or any evidence, in order to feed your anti-China sentiment. And it appears from your words that you're a student? Then why do you seemingly have such a negative image of China while still in a schooling age?
    1
  17497.  @hanhdoan9101  "神州 Shenzhou Dr. Li wrote all the details in his Weibo. My friend in China screenshot it and translate it as well so I've seen both Western and Chinese version that says the exact same thing" So what did his Weibo account say? Again, I don't even know why we are talking about Dr. Li when the topic was about Peng Shuai. I've already shown that his initial intention was that he didn't want the information to circulate outside of his WeChat group, but since you can't name the Western Media, then I assume you can't substantiate your claim he didn't want authorities to know that he knew. You said: "The reason I didn't want to tell you is because in two weeks when there is a news story about Chinese secret police infiltrating the publication and threatening the staff." How can Chinese secret police infiltrate a Western media publication and threatening the staff? Which Western media are you talking about that has been infiltrated by Chinese secret police? I thought earlier you mentioned that there are ways news is spread in America where Chinese officials cannot infiltrate. You said: "China uses strategies as social media moderation and threats/coercion to try to control them." But earlier you said you have friends who live in China and they managed to find ways to discuss forbidden topics, so you just proven that China cannot control all 1.4 billion citizens and that people managed to find ways to circumvent this. "Poor acting implies it wasn't staged? So whenever a movie critic says an actor had poor acting in a role, it's because that actually wasn't a movie but it was real life?" Now you're talking about a movie acting, but in an ordinary awards ceremony or dinner, if someone has poor acting that implies that it wasn't staged and quite possibly the real deal. This is what I mean by you grasping at straws that's all. "And just because someone does not have a history of sexual assault in the past doesn't mean they can't actually sexually assault someone in the future." This is a circular argument. You bring up your analogy of a "suspect that has a history of violence of abuse towards his wife and one day his wife suddenly dies makes him look suspicious." then when I ask for evidence of Zhang Gaoli having a history of sexual assault, you're unable to furnish evidence (you even admitted that "they had consensual sex PREVIOUSLY." so you switch to claiming he will do it in the future. Then what's the point of bringing up your analogy? "If someone steals for the first time and hasn't stolen anything before, does that mean he isn't guilty of stealing at the present time?" According to Western law's presumption of innocence, a suspect is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Since you have no evidence of Zhang Gaoli's crime, nor does he have a history of sexual assault, and Peng Shuai has already said that the allegations of sexual assault are false, then you have no grounds for you case against Zhang in the first place. "Yes the video was shady and had bad lighting." Actually, Peng Shuai was trying to shade her eyes from the Sun in the video, that's why it wasn't shady in the first place. And wait, the Sun? That means Peng Shuai is out in public, so how is it shady in the first place? "You can stop sending me links and bringing up her emails to WTA now. I already told you I believe they are staged by government and I gave my reasons two comments ago, so I'm not convinced no matter how many times you bring them up" That means you're just "conclusion shopping" that's all. You ignore the mountain of evidence and links that show Peng Shuai did not make allegations of sexual assault, and she's fine and attending dinners, awards ceremonies speaking with Yao Ming in broad daylight, then you're unreasonable biased against China that's all. "And America participates in many international affairs with China and makes several global scale business deals in the food, entertainment, and professional sports industries yet they are demonizing them...got it." Why is the American media painting such a negative image of China then, if it's not demonizing China? Why do people like you seemingly have a negative impression of China then? Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself? "And Chinese officials can infiltrate accessible American social media platforms (Reddit, Youtube, Twitter) etc but there are other platforms they can't" What platforms that they can't? "And should I tell you which platforms so you and your colleagues can attempt to infiltrate that?" Then how do you prove your previous statement that officials can't infiltrate those platforms if you can't name them? "And I have an anti-Chinese sentiment? Okay if I do, what do I receive in return for all these anti-Chinese sentiment propaganda that I supposedly doing?" Again, you promote hatred towards China among other people and this discourages them from coming to China to find out the truth. "Why does it matter if I'm in school or not? I have a brain, I can read, I can discern on my own" But you constantly ignore the mountain of links that I provided, then why at such a schooling age, do you already developed a one-sided view of events? You're clearly being biased at such a schooling age, then imagine what happens when you grow up and find out that you've been lied to all this while.
    1
  17498.  @hanhdoan9101  WTA is already politicising sports by suspending tournaments in China, over baseless claims of sexual assault, when there are none in Peng Shuai's post.
    1
  17499.  @hanhdoan9101  I'm not Steve Simon, how would I know what the next step of WTA would be? The point remains that WTA is politicising the issue by suspending tennis tournaments in China over baseless allegations of sexual assault, that Peng Shuai has repeatedly denied.
    1
  17500.  @hanhdoan9101  You seem so confident in jumping to conclusion that Zhang is guilty, you even cited an analogy of a husband with a history of violence and the sudden disappearance of his wife, even though according to you, Zhang has no history of sexual assault (even you admitted that the sex was consensual previously). When confronted with this, you switched to another analogy, this time of someone stealing for the first time and having actually stolen anything before, then what's the point of bringing up your analogy in the first place? If anything, under Western laws there is this presumption of innocence, where unless a suspect is proven guilty in a court of law, he is innocent until then. And there's already a mountain of links and evidence that Peng Shuai did not make any allegations of sexual assault, and she has repeatedly denied the allegations, but you just ignore this evidence that doesn't fit with your biased conclusions about the case that's all.
    1
  17501.  @hanhdoan9101  I don't like to speculate, that's precisely what you've been doing all along when you jumped to conclusions about Peng Shuai's case, and constantly ignore all the links and evidence I sent, and instead you suspect those photo shoots of being staged by government without proof, when it's all your speculation that's all. Furthermore, the WTA is already politicizing the issue by suspending tennis tournaments in China over baseless allegations of sexual assault, that Peng Shuai has repeatedly denied.
    1
  17502.  @hanhdoan9101  "神州 Shenzhou We are on the youtube comment section, not under oath in the court of law." Then why did you phrase it into such a formal sentence structure? I've previously expressed my reluctance to speculate, and I am under no obligation to fill in the blank in your sentence. I have previously said that I am not Steve Simon so I won't know the next step that WTA takes. However, the fact that WTA suspended tennis tournaments in China over baseless allegations of sexual assault, that Peng Shuai has repeatedly denied, is evidence that WTA is politicizing the issue.
    1
  17503.  @hanhdoan9101  I've answered your questions several times now, why don't you answer mine instead? I've previously asked you why'd you bring up the analogy of a husband with a history of violence and the sudden disappearance of his wife, when even you admitted that Zhang doesn't have a history of sexual assault? And why when confronted about it, you switched to another analogy this time of a thief that stole for the first time but doesn't have a history of stealing? WTA is politicising the issue, because the Peng Shuai has repeatedly denied the allegations of sexual assault, but the WTA went ahead and suspended the tournaments in China on baseless claims. Peng Shuai even wrote an email to WTA saying that the allegations of sexual assault were not true, and in the interview with the Singaporean newspaper, she said that she wrote the email herself and the English translation of her email was accurate.
    1
  17504.  @hanhdoan9101  1) So regarding your first analogy of the husband with history of violence, is there evidence that the people behind the photos/videos have a history of staging photos/videos? If not then, and without evidence of the photoshoots being staged, then why are people seemingly jumping to conclusions without proof? Also, although you did not use this example for Zhang, but that doesn't mean that this analogy cannot be applied to Zhang. Given that Zhang doesn't have a history of sexual assault (like you admitted earlier, the sex was consensual) then why people jump to conclusions that he's guilty without proof? 2) "I said no, just because they agreed to mutual sex in the past doesn't mean in the future he forced her to have sex." But if you read Peng Shuai's post carefully, they agreed to mutual sex in the past, and she also consented to sex in the latest encounter. Peng Shuai wrote: "Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well." And there's the fact that Peng Shuai has come out and denied the allegations of sexual assault. She wrote an email to WTA claiming that the allegations were false (and she confirmed the English translation of her email was accurate) as seen here (video: youtu.be/ZF9Owb9uSOE?t=150 ) she said her English wasn't good enough to translate her words from Chinese into English, but the English translation was in accordance with her wishes. (But you continually ignore the mountain of links because it doesn't fit your anti-China narrative that's all) ... 3) There is also the presumption of innocence under Western law, where until a suspect is proven guilty in a court of law, he is treated innocent. Given that you repeatedly failed to produce evidence of staged photoshoots, and that the allegations are repeatedly denied by Peng Shuai, there is virtually no basis for your argument at this point, given that you can't even prove the initial allegations of sexual assault existed in the first place.
    1
  17505.  @hanhdoan9101  I believed I covered this question of yours previously. "How does this politicize (aka pertain to government affairs)" That's one definition of the word politicize but it's not the definition I'm referring to. According to Oxford Dictionary: Verb: to politicize something is to make it become political in character. That's the definition I'm referring to.
    1
  17506.  @hanhdoan9101  It turns the whole issue political in nature. Hey, you previously stated that you're an American student right? And it appears you have many friends that live in China that you are in contact with. But have you tried asking your friends in China why do they keep on returning back to China, even after they arrived in the United States and experienced life there for themselves? Have you wondered why is it that American MSM seems to be out to get China and seemingly portray our country in a negative light to their audiences? I mean, you can't possibly be blind to the sheer amount of negative news about China out there, mostly coming from Western news sources, but have you possibly questioned why is this so? The United States likes to think of themselves as the "shining city on the hill" an example of Western-style democracy that other countries should strive to follow. But if this is the case, then why is it a non-Western style democracy like China can seemingly do well enough to potentially rival the USA in many fields such as economics, politics and even military? Shouldn't such an authoritarian system like China's be "doomed to fail" as it is often written in Western discourse on democracy? Then why is China seemingly succeeding where Western democratic institutions appear to be failing?
    1
  17507.  @hanhdoan9101  I believe I believed I covered this question of yours previously. I mean, it's no secret today that the United States is in decline and that China is rising. Many economists predict that China's economy is expected to surpass the United States someday in the foreseeable future. However, it's a combination of Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many Westerners have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States is simply too frightening for many (but not all) to fathom. The U.S does not want this to happen, and they're goal is to preserve their hegemonic rule for as long as possible, that's why Western MSM is suffused with anti-China news in order to paint a negative image of our country to their audiences. That's why U.S-China relations have been deteriorating to quite possibly their lowest point in years, because the U.S media doesn't want its audience to find out what China is really like.
    1
  17508.  @hanhdoan9101  Refer back to my previous posts. As U.S declines and China rises, there is a closing window of opportunity for the USA to deal a blow to China's economic growth, and that is by starting a small conflict with China (possibly over issues like Taiwan, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, etc) and that's why you often hear American news talk about this issues, even though frankly, these internal issues have nothing to do with the USA. The USA is hoping to drag China into a pointless conflict, that would cripple China's economic growth and buy a few more years of U.S hegemonic rule. That's the reason why Western media is painting China in a negative light in order to make their audiences think less of China and to support possibly going to war with China. That's what the USA did for Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Yemen War, etc, now they have China in their sights. But a war between USA and China would be disastrous for our countries, let alone for the rest of the world.
    1
  17509.  @hanhdoan9101  If you have the time to constantly ask questions in which I previously answered, then you should have time to find out the answer I wrote previously right?
    1
  17510.  @hanhdoan9101  "神州 Shenzhou I scrolled through all your posts and you didn't answer, but instead awkwardly tried to change the topic to economies and wars." I've repeatedly said many times, I'm not into speculation, and I'm not Steve Simon so I won't know what the next step WTA will take. Here's a video detailing China's response to WTA's suspension of tournaments in China. Video: Peng Shuai: China Rejects WTA's Politicization of Tennis Over Player's Safety youtu.be/tDGM-s39I9U "We have made clear our position, we are always firmly opposed to acts that politicize sports." - Wang Wenbin, Foreign Minstry spokesperson.
    1
  17511.  @hanhdoan9101  "神州 Shenzhou Okay thanks for answering Part 1. Could you now answer Part 2? " So clearly, you acknowledged that I answered your question, then how about you answer one of mine in exchange? I mean, it's only fair that you return the favor after I have done one for you. How's about you answer one of these earlier questions of mine: But have you tried asking your friends in China why do they keep on returning back to China, even after they arrived in the United States and experienced life there for themselves? Have you wondered why is it that American MSM seems to be out to get China and seemingly portray our country in a negative light to their audiences?
    1
  17512.  @hanhdoan9101  "神州 Shenzhou Actually you didn't answer" Hey, earlier you said: "神州 Shenzhou Okay thanks for answering Part 1." so you clearly acknowledged that I've answered your question, now why are you claiming I didn't? Since I have answered your question, how about you answer one of mine? It's only fair that you answer my questions after I did the same for you. "Speaking of changing the topic, previously you accused me of bringing up Dr. Li has a way to change the topic from Peng" So you can change the topic whenever you want, then can't I bring up other topics (since apparently we have reached a stalemate on the current discussion) as well? Even though Dr Li had nothing to do with the topic, I still responded by bringing up the fact that his report was on 30th Dec 2019 and by the next day, China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. So it's only a difference of one day that's all. Since I responded to your questions about Dr Li, (and according to you, I previously answered Part 1) then it's only fair that you answer one of mine isn't it?
    1
  17513.  @hanhdoan9101  I copy your responses so that it's easier to respond to what you said. You had acknowledged that I answered your question, but now you're claiming that I didn't, then it's kinda of unfair of you that's all. About "taking half a day to answer your question" I mean, I've been answering your questions to the best of my knowledge, but I'm not into speculation, I'm not Steve Simon and can't possibly know the next step by the WTA. However, you've made absolutely no attempt to answer any of my questions, yet you want to complain about the time I take to answer? As for your "real answer" again, that's just a blatant attempt by you to shoehorn my answer into a format that suits your argument, and forcing me to fill in the blank, then why should I walk into this trap if yours? You're fixing the format of the answer and forcing me to answer only a specific part through that format. And earlier you can change the topic by bringing up Dr Li, I humoured you by answering your questions about him (even though its unrelated), then can't I bring up new topics? I mean, it's apparent that you have a very negative opinion of China, you think that Chinese officials are "infiltrating" Western media, it's this fear and paranoia of China that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West, but why is this the case? Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself? You have friends from China yes? Have you asked them why is it they continually return to China if life was really as bad as Western media makes it out to be?
    1
  17514.  @hanhdoan9101  Well, acknowledging that I answered your question (at least Part 1) and then next claiming that I didn't answer your question, doesn't look good on you, especially given the fact that you refused to answer any of my questions presented, even after I have answered yours to the best of my knowledge. Yet you want to complain about me losing credibility when you're the one changing your mind? As for being hesitant to answer in your format and filling up the blank, I've already made it clear multiple times, I'm not into speculation, I'm not Steve Simon, how would I know what the next WTA step will be? That format is clearly meant to shoehorn and force my answer into a acceptable form for your argument, then why should I walk into that trap? You said: "The whole purpose of you coming to this Youtube video was to post comments refuting the sexual assault claim and convince people of the Western's anti-Chinese propaganda." Sorry I couldn't resist copying out this text of yours. Firstly that's not my whole purpose, I do login to YouTube to watch videos (just like everyone else). Secondly, I believe that I have refuted the allegations of sexual assault in Peng Shuai's post, she actually consented to sex. Peng Shuai wrote: Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well. (full translation of Peng Shuai's post available on Reddit) Additionally, Peng Shuai herself has repeatedly denied the allegations of sexual assault. On 17 November, Peng Shuai wrote an email to Steve Simon of the WTA saying that the sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng Shuai without her consent. Recently, Peng Shuai was interviewed by Singaporean newspaper Lianhe Zaobao and she denied the allegations again, saying in Mandarin "I have never said or written that anyone has sexually assaulted me, I have to clearly stress this point", and that there had been misunderstandings about her post on Weibo. Video:youtu.be/ZF9Owb9uSOE Thirdly and lastly, you say that I'm here to refute the allegations of sexual assault and convince people of the Western's anti-China propaganda. Then since I've completed the former, then what's your issue when I proceed with the latter in accordance with what you are saying?
    1
  17515.  @hanhdoan9101  According to your two definitions by Oxford Dictionary, I have fulfilled the requirements of (1): Say or write something to deal with or as a reaction to something. That's because I clearly wrote a response to your question, and therefore I have answered your question, by suddenly changing your claim to me having not answered, that only reflects badly on you, and certainly makes me less incentivized to continue answering your questions. I mean, why should I answer you question, having you acknowledged me answering it, only for you to suddenly reverse your claim and state that I didn't answer it? "And if you read carefully what I said, I said reason why you came on to this specific video regarding Peng Shuai, not Youtube in general." Well, I can say that I also came to this specific YouTube video to watch what CNN has to say about Peng Shuai, so that's already more than the two reasons you highlighted why I came to this specific YouTube video. You said: "Btw reposting the Weibo translation and interview links so that they are more recent in this comment thread or to spread the links won't help. People already know about Chinese media being staged." Actually, I referred people to Reddit (an American social media) and the interview links was by Singaporean Newspaper Lianhe Zaobao so what "Chinese media" are you referring to? How are Reddit and Singaporean newspaper media considered Chinese media? And we've already gone over the fact you have no evidence of "Chinese media being staged" even you previously admitted that you have no evidence, except for "the video looks shady" even though it's shot in bright daylight, as even Peng Shuai said. You asked: "Can you highlight whatever portion within my template is "trapping" or "shoehorning" you?" The part where you said: "I speculate they will______" Because I've made it clear that I'm not into speculation, I'm not Steve Simon so I won't know what the next step the WTA will take. The funny thing is that you said: "I tripled-checked and there is nowhere within that template that goes against what you have been advocating" but you don't even listen to me when I clearly stated multiple times that I don't want to speculate, so it's as if you never actually factored my considerations, yet you claim to have triple-checked. ... You said: "And you are more than welcome to try to convince people about Western anti-Chinese propaganda. Did I tell you to stop?" Alright then. Now that I have your permission to continue, lets start with one of your recent statements. Why did you seemingly assume that my reference to Reddit (an American media) and Lianhe Zaobao (a Singaporean Newspaper) are related to "Chinese media being staged"? They certainly aren't Chinese media, and both times, they refer to words that come from Peng Shuai's mouth (from her post, and from her interview with Singaporean reporter). In case you didn't know, Singapore is an ally of USA, the U.S Aircraft Carriers dock at Singapore's naval base in Changi on their journey to the South China Seas. So there is reason to believe Singapore's journalist interviewing Peng Shuai is not staged in China's favor. I recommend you watch the whole interview again here:youtu.be/ZF9Owb9uSOE instead of just brushing it off as "Chinese media" when it's actually Singaporean media.
    1
  17516.  @hanhdoan9101  "神州 Shenzhou Nope, I'm not going to take "I don't want to speculate" as an answer. I'll take it as a response but not an answer to the question I am asking." But according to the two definitions by Oxford Dictionary that you quoted, I have fulfilled the requirements of (1): 'Say or write something to deal with or as a reaction to something.' since I wrote something that's a reaction/response to your question. So according to Oxford Dictionary, I have answered your question. But why'd you acknowledge me answering your question, only to suddenly reverse the claim and state that I didn't? This reflects badly on you, and it certainly discourages me from answering any more questions, given that you can choose to change you acknowledgement of my answers as you please. You said: "And Lianhe Zaobao is a Singaporean newspaper that leans towards Beijing views so why should viewers have any reason to trust it?" Do you have evidence that Lianhe Zaobao leans towards Beijing views? Otherwise, Singapore is a U.S ally so why do you think their media is untrustworthy? You said: "Plus there is a huge population of Chinese residents in Singapore, and I'm sure many foreign agreements between Singapore and China;" Most of those Chinese residents in Singapore consider themselves Singaporeans, not Chinese nationals. And those foreign agreements between Singapore and China are trade agreements, since China is the largest trading partner of many countries in the region. But Singapore has military cooperation with USA, they allow U.S carriers to dock at their naval base, and Singapore even purchased U.S F-35 fighter jets. I mean, are you implying that just because a country has significant Chinese population that they are an enemy of the USA? Then this is the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mentality that you are exhibiting. You said: "you think just saying it's a Singaporean publication will make any impact?" Well, at least Lianhe Zaobao is certainly not Chinese media, and Singapore is a U.S ally, or at least neutral in the geopolitical conflict between U.S and China. You said: "And when I say Chinese media, I mean any piece of media released through the careful curation and moderation of the Chinese Communist Party." And Reddit is American media, not Chinese media, I specifically referred people to the translation of Peng Shuai's post on Reddit, as well as through Lianhe Zaobao, a Singapore media, so what Chinese media did I refer to? You said: "So for the template, let's take out "I speculate." " Then your phrase "I speculate they will______" becomes "They will______" and that turns the entire sentence from a speculation into something that really will happen in the future, so isn't that worst? I mean, I already stated multiple times, I'm not Steve Simon, how would I know what are the plans for the WTA and whether they will become certainty?
    1
  17517.  @garrygibbons2989  Yes she is, but she has no plans to. According to Singaporean Newspaper Lianhe Zaobao interview with Peng Shuai, she says in Mandarin that we are still in the midst of the pandemic and that she is am not competing in any events at the moment. She will attend games as per normal, but she doesn't believe in traveling overseas just to prove something. What does traveling abroad now even prove, that's what she said. https://youtu.be/ZF9Owb9uSOE?t=250
    1
  17518.  @nickiseb8910  Which country is China currently at war with you tell me? Our People's Liberation Army soldiers haven't had any actual combat experience since 1979. Instead, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc in African countries. China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, as compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  17519.  @epicureannerd8854  About you being an engineers, Chinese universities produce the most STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) graduates out of any other country in the world. Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/02/02/the-countries-with-the-most-stem-graduates-infographic/ Countries With The Most STEM Graduates 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ...
    1
  17520.  @nickiseb8910  Which country does China occupy? Tibet is part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China.
    1
  17521.  @epicureannerd8854  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  17522.  @nickiseb8910  Source: China overtakes US as Africa’s top trading partner businessdailyafrica.com/corporate/539550-850122-view-asAMP-weqnvxz/index.html
    1
  17523.  @epicureannerd8854  The Chinese government is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending and catching up fast to the United States. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($451.9 billion) <--- 3. European Union ($379.0 billion) 4. Japan ($165.7 billion) 5. Germany ($118.8 billion) 6. South Korea ($91.6 billion) In the West, researchers offend have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    1
  17524.  @nickiseb8910  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia.
    1
  17525.  @nickiseb8910  Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China youtu.be/TtduKDpy4oc
    1
  17526.  @presidentnotsure3273  The Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, Europe, USA and India. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  17527.  @nickiseb8910  China's infrastructure construction is arguably the best in the world and we are home to many of the world's longest and highest bridges. Sources: List of highest bridges wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest_bridges#Completed_bridges List of longest bridges wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest_bridges#Completed List of longest suspension bridge spans wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest_suspension_bridge_spans#Completed_suspension_bridges List of longest masonry arch bridge spans wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest_masonry_arch_bridge_spans List of longest arch bridge spans wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest_arch_bridge_spans#Completed_bridges List of longest cable-stayed bridge spans wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest_cable-stayed_bridge_spans#Completed_cable-stayed_bridges
    1
  17528.  @epicureannerd8854  China publishes more scientific and technical journal articles in physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences, than any other country in the world. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_scientific_and_technical_journal_articles Countries by published scientific papers in 2016: 1. China (426,165 articles) 2. United States (408,985 articles) 3. India (110,320 articles) 4. Germany (103,122 articles) 5. United Kingdom (97,527 articles) 6. Japan (96,536 articles) This implies that a growing number of scientific discoveries are being made in Chinese-language papers. So Chinese researchers hold the advantage here because they have access to Western English language research papers, but Western scientists might have difficulty with Chinese-language papers because of the language barrier.
    1
  17529.  @MarkYeung1  "the government should have listened to the PEACEFUL DEMONSTRATIONS and scrapped the extradition bill long ago." Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam scrapped the Extradition Bill by 23 October 2019. Yet the Hong Kong riots continued even after the extradition bill was scrapped until the Hong Kong National Security Law was imposed. Today, peace has returned to Hong Kong and the city can finally begin to recover, so isn't the National Security Law a good thing? Otherwise, who knows how long the Hong Kong riots will continue even after the extradition bill was scrapped.
    1
  17530.  @bobwatchit9636  Gunship diplomacy basically.
    1
  17531.  @MarkYeung1  China is in fact the biggest trading partner of those countries, how is that bullying?
    1
  17532.  @stunningandbrave2520  "神州 Shenzhou Is China committed to ending trade sanctions against Australia?" Well, why did Australia banned Chinese telecommunications companies Huawei and ZTE then?
    1
  17533.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou True, but he never ever points to anything good about America." Cyrus Janssen is a U.S citizen, so while he cannot change China's government, he can do his part to change the U.S government isn't it?
    1
  17534.  @stunningandbrave2520  About those "nuclear threats", if Australia doesn't want to be the potential target of a nuclear strike, then the solution is simple. Just don't acquire nuclear submarines in the first place! But if Australia chooses to get those nuclear subs, then don't blame others if they see your country as a potential nuclear target is all I'm saying.
    1
  17535.  @stunningandbrave2520  Your referring to Nordstream right? But why would Russia bomb Nordstream when they can simply turn off the tap? Shouldn't you be asking who benefits from bombing that pipeline? The US is able to benefit from shipping LNG gas to Europe, with the destruction of Nordstream.
    1
  17536.  @stunningandbrave2520  "神州 Shenzhou They are being acquired." So if you have no qualms about Australia acquiring nuclear submarines, then why are you complaining about Australia being subjected to nuclear threats? If Australia doesn't want to become a potential nuclear target, then simply don't get nuclear subs in the first place.
    1
  17537.  @MarkYeung1  Australia banning Chinese telecommunications company Huawei and ZTE left a bad impression of Australia on the Chinese people.
    1
  17538.  @MarkYeung1  Good News! President Xi Jinping spoke to Zelenskyy over the phone. This demonstrates China's commitment towards seeking a peaceful resolution to the conflict in Ukraine by listening to both sides of the story.
    1
  17539.  @bartonlee3594  But you yourself agreed with Cyrus message (you said: "神州 Shenzhou I agree with that message.") then what's wrong with other people also agreeing with Cyrus message? His message is one of peace, about Building Bridges, Not Walls between China and the US.
    1
  17540.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou My friend, Cyrus plays to the base (Chinese nationalists) and does not promote unity in any sense" If that's the case, then why is Cyrus posting on YouTube, if he's catering to Chinese nationalists? Also why is he using English instead of Chinese, if he were catering to Chinese nationalists? Also whoever says that Cyrus is promoting unity? He is promoting cooperation between USA and China, that's not the same as unity. Where did you get the idea of unity from?
    1
  17541.  @stunningandbrave2520  "Not specifically: gas supply more generally." So you're saying receiving LNG from the U.S is also dangerous right? Since they are after all, an aggressive power? As for turning off the tap, Russia is continuing to supply Germany (and many other EU nations) with gas even as we speak. Turning off the tap would result in less profits for Russia so why would it do that? On the other hand, who would want to sabotage the German-Russia relation by blowing up Nordstream? Who benefits except the US, who can now sell LNG at a higher price to Germany?
    1
  17542.  @stunningandbrave2520  "Because they are not carrying nuclear weapons: they are carrying nuclear fuel." Nuclear submarines are fueled by highly enriched uranium (HEU) the type that are also used in nuclear weapons, so if Australia acquires nuclear subs, then of course, Australia has a greater chance of becoming a potential nuclear target. "If you say they are a nuclear target, you cannot complain if they make you a nuclear target in return." Again, Australia becomes a nuclear target, because Australia is acquiring nuclear submarines. If Australia doesn't want to become such a target, then simply don't get nuclear subs in the first place.
    1
  17543.  @MarkYeung1  40 times throughout the years? It's because both President Xi and President Putin assumed office in 2012 in China and Russia respectively, so Xi and Putin had at least a decade to speak to each other multiple times. However Zelenskyy assumed office in Ukraine only in 2019, so President Xi has had less time to speak with him as compared to Putin. You mean you cannot do the math?
    1
  17544.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Huawei is banned in Australia the same reason why Facebook is banned in China." But Facebook is not an Australian company, why should Australia care to ban Huawei and ZTE?
    1
  17545.  @item6931  You said: "He is a typical internet vlogger (doesn't matter the views/ideology). You create an echo chamber of people who all agree with each other" Barton Lee has stated that he agrees with Cyrus Janssen's message. He also said "神州 Shenzhou I agree with much of what Cyrus says, yes."
    1
  17546.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou To summarize your point here: If you don't want to be invaded, don't get nukes in the first place." Sounds like a threat. ???" Who said Australia is being invaded? I said that if Australia doesn't want to become a potential target for nuclear strikes, then don't acquire nuclear submarines in the first place. And it's common sense, not a threat.
    1
  17547.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Do you ever disagree with your fellow Chinese nationalists. If so, can you give us an example?" Of course I do. For example, some Chinese nationalists want outright war with USA, but I want peace not war, which is why I agree with Cyrus' message of Building Bridges, Not Walls between China and the U.S.
    1
  17548.  @MarkYeung1  "36%! That's very very high." That's less than 50% of Australians polled.
    1
  17549.  @stunningandbrave2520  You said: "No. Because the U.S. is neither a dictatorship nor aggressive towards Australia." Look what happened to Australian journalist, Julian Assange who was imprisoned just for telling the truth of US monitoring activities on its allies. Also, China is not aggressive towards Australia, but Australia is increasingly so towards China.
    1
  17550.  @stunningandbrave2520  "And how do you propose they could do this?" It's simple. Simply don't acquire nuclear submarines in the first place. Just cancel the AUKUS deal since it does not benefit Australia in any way, instead it makes Australia a potential target for nuclear strikes if they acquire nuclear subs. "In any case, Congress has authorized the sale of hundreds of Tomahawk missiles to Australia, which actually can carry nuclear warheads" Cancel this deal then. Didn't Australia cancel a multi-billion dollar submarine deal with France? So it should have no problems doing it again.
    1
  17551.  @stunningandbrave2520  "Irrelevant to the Australian communications issue. Huawei and ZTE would just have to stop supplying spares and it stops working." Why would Huawei and ZTE do that? They are both companies, so they want to make profit by selling spares.
    1
  17552.  @item6931  "I know Barton Lee well enough here. He has an independent mind." But he explicited stated that he agreed with Cyrus message, despite claiming it's an "echo-chamber" of consensus. Then you're also saying that others who agreed have independent minds as well?
    1
  17553.  @stunningandbrave2520  So you're aware of how Julian Assange is being treated, then why do you not perceive the U.S as being aggressive to Australia? And what trade sanctions are you talking about? China imported 169,000 tons of beef from Australia.
    1
  17554.  @stunningandbrave2520  Look, you're the one asking me "And how do you propose they could do this?" but when I gave you my suggestion, you just claim "Neither you nor the party you represent determines Australian defense policy or acquisitions."? They why ask me in the first place?
    1
  17555.  @stunningandbrave2520  "Because it's not their decision. They will do whatever the CCP tells them to." It's the same with Australian companies, American companies and so on, if their respective government tells them to. Does that mean that you stop doing business with those companies?
    1
  17556.  @bartonlee3594  "Item69 Yes, and he refuses to answer my question: Name one instance in which you DISagree with CPC policy." When did you ask this question? I've combed through the whole post, and the question you asked was "Do you ever disagree with your fellow Chinese nationalists. If so, can you give us an example?" and I've already answered with "Of course I do. For example, some Chinese nationalists want outright war with USA, but I want peace not war, which is why I agree with Cyrus' message of Building Bridges, Not Walls between China and the U.S."
    1
  17557.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou YOU are the one who made that threat about Australia, not me." Did I ever made a threat about Australia being invaded? Could you quote me my exact words claiming that Australia is being invaded? All I talked about was that if you don't want to become a potential target for nuclear strikes, then simply don't get nuclear subs in the first place.
    1
  17558.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou I don't think any Chinese nationalists want outright was with USA. Can you name one such nationalist?" One such person is Admiral Luo Yuan (罗援). In December 2018, he proposed that a possible solution to tensions with the United States in the South China Sea would be to sink one or two United States Navy aircraft carriers to break US resolve. That would be tantamount to an act of war with the USA.
    1
  17559.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou Why do you think that nations who buy arms from foreign countries are a threat to anyone?" In Australia case, they are always welcome to purchase non-nuclear submarines (like the multi-billion submarine deal they had with France) but if they choose to acquire nuclear subs, that would be taken as a violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty, and Australia should also be prepared to face the consequences of becoming a potential nuclear target. If Australia doesn't want such a target painted on their back, then simply don't acquire nuclear subs in the first place.
    1
  17560.  @stunningandbrave2520  "神州 Shenzhou .... You are not a free-thinking person who can express his opinions without fear of his own government." Why do you make such assumptions out of people who take a different view from yours? In this comment threat I've expressed how I disagree with Chinese nationalists that want outright war (such as Admiral Luo Yuan) but it's because you're unable to accept a different view, that's why you label me nationalist.
    1
  17561.  @bartonlee3594  Speaking of "echo-chambers" it seems that we have a mini echo-chamber right here, consisting of you, Stunning and Brave, Item69 and mark yeung. All of you seem to agree and like each other points, whereas I'm the one that's presenting a different point of view here.
    1
  17562.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou My friend, I asked that question above, and you said you disliked nationalists who want war." You asked: "Do you ever disagree with your fellow Chinese nationalists. If so, can you give us an example?" so I responded that I disliked Chinese nationalists who want war. Later you asked "神州 Shenzhou I don't think any Chinese nationalists want outright was with USA. Can you name one such nationalist?" and I've named Admiral Luo Yuan (罗援). So I've been answering your questions all this time. You said: "But you DID NOT cite any actual CPC policies that you disagree with . That was my question." No, you didn't. I've combed through this comment thread and you never asked me to cite any CPC policy. Show me where in this thread did you pose such a question addressed to me.
    1
  17563.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou This is an echo-chamber of people who all support CPC policies. How can you possibly refute that? " Didn't you yourself agreed with Cyrus Janssen's message? Then you're contributing to the echo-chamber you speak of?
    1
  17564.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou But in America or Australia, you don't have to worry about government agents harassing you if you protest gov. policies. Not so in China." American newscaster, Tucker Carlson spoke out against U.S sending billions of dollars to one of the most corrupt countries in Europe, and yet he was fired. And we have Julian Assange still in prison (yes, he's in Belmarsh Prison) just for telling the truth of US monitoring activities on its allies. As for China, didn't Beijing recently gotten rid of the zero cove policy after protests in Xinjiang, and China is now reopening to the world? Isn't that an example of how protest changed the Chinese government's policies?
    1
  17565.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou But in America or Australia, you don't have to worry about government agents harassing you if you protest gov. policies. Not so in China." American newscaster, Tucker Carlson spoke out against U.S sending billions of dollars to one of the most corrupt countries in Europe, and yet he was fired. And we have Julian Assange still in prison (yes, he's in Belmarsh Prison) just for telling the truth of US monitoring activities on its allies.
    1
  17566.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou But in America or Australia, you don't have to worry about government agents harassing you if you protest gov. policies." American newscaster, Tucker Carlson spoke out against U.S sending billions of dollars to Ukraine, and yet he was fired. And we have Julian Assange still in prison (yes, he's in Belmarsh Prison) just for telling the truth of US monitoring activities on its allies.
    1
  17567.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou Yes you did. You wrote above that Australia will face consequences if it buys the military hardware." Where in that statement is there a threat of Australia being invaded? You're the one who claimed I made the threat of Australia being invaded, but I never said it was at risk of being invaded. ""神州 Shenzhou You claim that this is not a threat, but it obviously is: "ustralia doesn't want such a target painted on their back, then simply don't acquire nuclear subs" Again, where in that statement is there a threat of Australia being invaded? Remember, you wrote: "神州 Shenzhou To summarize your point here: If you don't want to be invaded, don't get nukes in the first place." Sounds like a threat. ???" but I never mentioned anything about Australia being invaded.
    1
  17568.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou But you never state any CPC POLICIES that you disagree with." Because you've never asked such a question out of me. In this whole comment thread, and you've never posed such a question to me, you just asked me "Do you ever disagree with your fellow Chinese nationalists." to which I've answered already. And then out of the blue, you suddenly said: "Yes, and he refuses to answer my question: Name one instance in which you DISagree with CPC policy." but it's apparent that you've never asked me this question at all.
    1
  17569.  @bartonlee3594  Mostly I agree with Cyrus, because like I said, he promotes the peaceful message of Building Bridges, Not Walls, between the U.S and China. But I disagree with Cyrus on his views of Russia being the aggressor, when it was NATO eastward expansion right up to Russia's doorstep that led to the special military operation.
    1
  17570.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou I asked if you disagree with any actual CPC POLICIES." You said no such thing. You did ask me "Do you ever disagree with your fellow Chinese nationalists. If so, can you give us an example?" and I've responded with Chinese nationalists that want outright war with the U.S as an example. You asked me to name one such nationalist and I gave Admiral Luo Yuan as an example. But throughout the whole post, you never asked me anything about CPC policies. Quote me the comment where you asked such a question.
    1
  17571.  @bartonlee3594  Look, I've already given you answers to your questions, but you haven't actually answered any of mine. I keep asking you where did I ever made the threat about Australia being invaded? But you cannot answer me, instead you talk about Australia being a nuclear target, but that's not a threat of Australia being invaded. Australia becomes a potential nuclear target because it made the decision to acquire nuclear submarines. If it doesn't want that, then simply don't get nuclear subs in the first place.
    1
  17572.  @bartonlee3594  Who are you to keep on demanding answers out of me? I've already answered you that I disagree with Chinese nationalists that want outright war (like Admiral Luo Yuan). But thus far, you haven't answered my question of where did I ever made the threat about Australia being invaded?
    1
  17573.  @bartonlee3594  Same here, I agree with Cyrus' message that if the US and China cooperate, the whole world benefits. But I disagree with Cyrus on his views of Russia being the aggressor, given even before 2022, Ukraine had been shelling Donetsk and Luhansk (collectively known as Donetsk) since 2014. And there's the fact that NATO has been expanding eastwards right up to Russia's doorstep.
    1
  17574.  @0rcryst  This is about a granny snickering so what has criticising a country or government even got to do with this topic at all?
    1
  17575. BearOwl Why are you blaming Japanese for having aversion to tattoos? This aversion to tattoos is shared by both Chinese and Japanese cultures so why blame our cultures for being what they are?
    1
  17576. The government set specific guidelines for the ban, such as "Absolutely do not allow persons or songs that are vulgar, tasteless, contradicting party ideology, scandalised, low class etc. If your song doesn't fit into all this, then it's likely to be allowed on Chinese media.
    1
  17577. Adrian Nelson America has world's highest incarceration rate and its prisons are filled to overcapacity. The US is also releasing some inmates back onto the streets in order to ease the overcrowding in its prisons.
    1
  17578. I like how you debunk Western propaganda using articles from Western news as well as visiting the official website of these places. Yet despite the freedom of speech in the West, many Westerners are unaware that their government is sponsoring these color revolutions.
    1
  17579.  @neil6958  NTD = New Tang Dynasty and they are an offshoot of falundafa (法轮大法) Media, just like Epoch Media Group. And I showed you pictures of "nail houses" (钉子户) to which you respond "sentimentality" (which I disproven above because she has named her price). Yet because you can't refute my points so you start calling me a bot?
    1
  17580.  @宋庆-i4m  You said: "You're do not live in Taiwan this is none of your business. why you ignore me?" Lol, did I even make any reference to Taiwan here in this thread?
    1
  17581. @jordie4423 How on Earth does Putin factor into Taiwan's elections? As for Asian democratic powerhouses cooperating with western economic powerhouses, didn't Lai Ching-te said that he seeks dialogue with the mainland?
    1
  17582.  @宋庆-i4m  Lol just because the video is talking about Taiwan, doesn't mean that my post has to be about Taiwan. Could you point out where in my OP did I ever mentioned Taiwan at all?
    1
  17583.  @johnsmith1953x  The development was jointly made by Ma's team and researchers from School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology in the US, was published online on the website of the journal "Nature" on January 3, 2024.
    1
  17584. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  17585. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17586. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17587.  @johnsmith1953x  What brand of PC is the Motz?
    1
  17588. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17589. -India is not a claimant to South China Sea Issue so what's it got to do with India? -Does India want hand over the Dalai Lama to Chinese custody? This issue is China's own internal issue with Tibet, and nothing to do with India after all. -CPEC is bilateral affair between Pakistan and China, and Pakistan is its own sovereign country as recognized by India. Take up it with Pakistan if you have any issues with it. -As for occupied territories, China is willing to enter negotiations and even to make concessions in Aksai China, if India cedes Tawang to China. Contrary to what you may think, China does not claim all of Arunachal Pradesh, only the Tawang province as part of South Tibet. Source:China ready to make concessions in Aksai Chin if India cedes part of Tawang in Arunachal Pradesh? zeenews.india.com/india/china-ready-to-make-concessions-in-aksai-chin-if-india-cedes-part-of-tawang-in-arunachal-pradesh_1982943.html
    1
  17590. Nagalakshmi Saladi If India can claim territory because of historical basis, then why can't China claim territory because of historical basis as well? Why the unfair double standards here?
    1
  17591. Nagalakshmi Saladi If you claim Mount Kailash in Tibet is Indian territory, then how exactly did India come to acquire this territory? Through forceful occupation and annexing it? Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when Mongolians conquered both Tibet and Song dynasty China, making them part of Yuan dynasty China.
    1
  17592. Why can't I ask you more questions? Because Mount Kailash is the name of Hindu God, automatically means Tibet is part of India? What logic is this? Tibet was conquered by Mongolians and Manchus, and incorporated into China since 800 years ago, so what makes you think Tibet is independent state? Even Indian PM Nehru recognize Tibet as an autonomous region of China, yet you claim Tibet is part of India? Prior to 1962 war, Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai wanted to negotiate our border dispute with India, so he visited New Delhi and proposed the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence 和平共处五项原则 to define China-India relations. But PM Nehru wasn't interested in negotiation, instead he pursued an aggressive "Forward" policy of building military bases at our dispute borders. some bases even protruding beyond the international line and into actual Chinese territory.
    1
  17593. Nagalakshmi Saladi Tibet was reincorporated back into China in 1951 and the Tibetan government signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet. Even Indian PM Nehru recognise that Tibet is autonomous region of China, yet you claim Mount Kailash is part of India since time immemorial? Where's your proof? Prior to the 1962, Zhou Enlai even proposed a 20 KM demilitarised zone and unilaterally withdrew PLA forces from the region to cool down hostilities. But Indian army did not withdraw and saw this as Chinese weakness and send in troops to occupy territory previously occupied by PLA troops. So which country here is eager for war here? You are simply biased against China that's all, and only see everything from Indian point of view.
    1
  17594. It is clear that you are simply biased against China, and see everything only from India's point of view that's all. Where is India's proof that Mount Kailash belongs to them? Because it is named after Hindu God? China has produced much historical evidence that Tibet belongs to China (such as Mongolians and Manchu people conquering it and making it part of Yuan dynasty China and Qing dynasty China respectively) and there is even a Seventeen Point agreement signed in 1951 by Tibetans, acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Even prior to the 1962, Zhou Enlai visited New Delhi 4 times in a year, but PM Nehru only visited Beijing once, so who is more eager to negotiate our borders here? You only see things from India's point of view and blame China for starting the war?
    1
  17595. Who is creating false history here when India claims Mount Kailash as part of its territory because of Hindu god? And it is historical fact that Tibet was part of China since Yuan dynasty. Even the title of Dalai Lama is bestowed upon Tibetan leaders, by a Ming Dynasty Chinese prince, so how is Tibet not part of China historically? If you China to settle issues with the 14th DL, then why don't India hand him over to Chinese custody? This issue is internal issue between Tibet and China and has nothing to do with India.
    1
  17596. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilizations still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have long since faded to history. How is China a rogue country when it has outlasted many other nations that have since succumbed to history? China has existed for thousands of years and it is likely to exist for thousands into the future, following this historical trend.
    1
  17597. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17598. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。轮子只靠黑中国吃饭。
    1
  17599. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17600. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17601. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  17602. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17603. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。轮子不许说中国的坏话。轮子只靠黑中国吃饭。
    1
  17604.  @Andy-P  Have you actually talked to the youth in China?
    1
  17605.  @Andy-P  But you've never spoken to any youths in China, so what makes you sure how they feel?
    1
  17606.  @Andy-P  No, you're claiming that Westerners can see the problems of China, even though people like you have never actually been to China and talked to the youth here. Yet you already make sarcastic quips.
    1
  17607. The mosquito only knows how to suck blood of others, waging wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for example.
    1
  17608.  @Yaro79  Russia external debt has been falling steadily to become one of the lowest in the world. Whereas Ukraine is unlikely to be able to repay its debt any time soon.
    1
  17609. If your country's army is not loyal to the government, then there will be possibility of military coup, just like in Thailand government.
    1
  17610. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  17611. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms and would have done a 5th if she didn't voluntarily withdrew her candidacy from the last German election. Whereas Chinese President Xi Jinping is only entering his 3rd term.
    1
  17612. Chinese President Xi Jinping is only entering his 3rd term, whereas German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms and would have done a 5th if she didn't voluntarily withdrew her candidacy from the last German election.
    1
  17613. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China....
    1
  17614. Agreed. Corruption afflicts every country to a certain degree, but at least under President Xi there are crackdowns on corruption within the communist party and more than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption in China, including over 120 high-ranking officials, including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders.
    1
  17615.  @robinmiller871  It's called projection. Projecting American guilt about African slavery, onto China.
    1
  17616.  @robinmiller871  It's called projection. Projecting American guilt about African slavery, onto China.
    1
  17617.  @lucdubois3927  "神州 Shenzhou if I want to talk about prison populations? That's not the subject," What is the subject then, if not prison populations? Didn't you agree to this topic when you said: "神州 Shenzhou comparing a prison populated with criminals..."?
    1
  17618.  @mariosuarez547  The United States banned Huawei on grounds of "protecting their national interests" then can't China do the same to protect our national interests? If you watch Nathan Rich's video entitled: The REAL Reason Facebook is banned in China! it turns out that terrorists in China had been using Facebook to coordinate their attacks in China, so China wanted Facebook to ban those accounts (since they too, violate Facebook policy). Facebook refused to comply so that's why they were banned in China.
    1
  17619.  @salakasto  Hey, why isn't your comment appearing on my screen?
    1
  17620.  LOSER Trump 2  China has a low number of Covid-related deaths, despite being the most populous country in the world. On the other hand, the USA has just 4% of the world's population yet they have over 25% of the world's Covid-19 cases and deaths.
    1
  17621.  LOSER Trump 2  Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of the Great Chinese Famine, caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Chairman Mao couldn't possibly control the weather, and even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    1
  17622.  @james_l4337  "神州 Shenzhou There's something called shadow banned. I can't see a lot of comments as well, because I'm also shadow banned" Indeed. Your comment is also shadow banned, but I can still access it on the notifications. I think the AI is picking out certain phrases or words that violate their policies and shadow-banning such posts that contain those words.
    1
  17623. China made Uighur culture into an UNESCO intangible cultural heritage.
    1
  17624. Apart from Russia, China has successfully tested a cutting-edge hypersonic aircraft, the Xingkong-2 (星空-2 "Starry Sky-2") launched using a rocket. The aircraft rides shockwaves generated by it's hypersonic flight and maintained speeds above Mach 5.5 (or 5.5 times the speed of sound) for more than 400 seconds, attaining a top speed of 7,344 kmph. Experts say the aircraft's speed and unpredictable trajectory will challenge modern missile defense systems. Video: Military news: China tests hypersonic aircraft Starry Sky-2 youtu.be/aVWQ2uOCepU
    1
  17625.  Cipher Crypto  China even debuted our very own Mars Lander. China completed a crucial landing test ahead of its 2020 Mars Mission, which plans to send a probe to the red planet in 2020 with the Long March 5 Rocket. The probe will take about 7 months to reach Mars and 7 minutes to land. Video: Mars Mission: China completes lander test for 2020 Mars Mission youtu.be/CmQkWnp0t-c
    1
  17626.  Cipher Crypto  About 5G, China conducted the world's first 5G remote surgery on test animal. The doctor is located some 50km away from the operating theater, using robotic arms to operate on a test animal and remove its liver. Video: China completes world’s first 5G remote surgery in test on animal youtu.be/yFR61jjL1vo This is a world first, and no other country has performed remote surgery over a 5G network as China has done so far.
    1
  17627. Filipinos have been mentally colonized. Such people reject their own language, culture and values as "backward" and try to fit themselves into the ideals and values of their former colonial masters. The mentally colonised do not adapt ideas to their own reality, instead they try to live in other people's reality. It's like Stockholm Syndrome.
    1
  17628. There's a term to describe the behavior of Filipinos. It's Colonial Mentality. Such people view their own culture, langauge and values as "backward" and try to adhere to the language, culture and values of their colonial masters. Even after being granted independence, the minds of the people remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. It's like a colonial version of Stockholm Syndrome.
    1
  17629. There's a term to describe the behavior of Filipinos. It's colonial mentality, which is an internalized perception among Filipinos that the culture, language and values of the colonizer are inherently superior over that of other cultures (including their own). Even after Philippines was granted independence, the minds of its people remain enslaved and loyal towards their former masters. Mental shackles remain even if the physical shackles are broken.
    1
  17630. India started construction 15 years ago on 73 important roads at our border, but still have 46 roads left unfinished. They even had special Border Roads Organization set up especially for this. (timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/govt-gives-more-powers-to-bro-for-roads-along-china-border/articleshow/60147975.cms )
    1
  17631. Salaam my brother, may peace be upon you.
    1
  17632. "East Turkestan" is a fake name coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists (including Nikita Bichurin) who intended the name to replace the common Western term for the region, Chinese Turkestan. There was historically no such country.
    1
  17633.  Edmund Kemper  It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set and many economists firmly believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's economy sometime in the foreseeable future.
    1
  17634.  NEO GEO  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    1
  17635.  @mc-lb9dk  China isn't decoupling the USA, China actually welcomes the USA on board the Belt and Road Initiative, it's just that USA doesn't want anything to do with BRI.
    1
  17636. More evidence regarding the Chinese ships selling oil to North Korea has surfaced. It seems that the oil tanker involved transferred its cargo on the order of its Taiwan-based charterer, Billions Bunker Group Corp and according to Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson, Hua Chunying, "In reality, the ship in question has, since August, not docked at a Chinese port and there is no record of it entering or leaving a Chinese port,"
    1
  17637.  @rioyoung1493  there is no spoken "Chinese" language alone, you have to define which dialect you are using, whether Mandarin, Cantonese, etc.
    1
  17638.  Razen Sakya  I clicked on the link you provided, but it doesn't work.
    1
  17639. During his presidential campaign, Donald Trump wanted to label China as currency manipulators. But after meeting with President Xi in MaraLargo, he completely flipped his stance. "They're not currency manipulators," President Trump told The Wall Street Journal during 2017 press conference in the Oval Office, and then went on to explain how Beijing hasn't been manipulating the yuan for months. Now President Trump is helping Chinese company ZTE, and tweeting "Too many jobs in China lost"? Can people see the trend here?
    1
  17640.  @UltraGamer9999999999  "Yeah Chinese nurse look totally fine" Did I ever said that Chinese nurse were unscathed? I only said that Chinese doctors and nurses look well-equipped in comparison to American healthcare workers looking ill-equipped and you literally just proved my point.
    1
  17641.  @UltraGamer9999999999  Look at the biased double standards between the mask imprint on American healthcare workers and Chinese healthcare workers. Video: youtu.be/XnFCnvrdhig?t=3946
    1
  17642.  @FirstNameLastName-vw7ol  China had informed the World Health Organization of mysterious new virus strain on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had isolated and identified the coronavirus strain and by 7th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. How did China cover up? Dr Li Wenliang was spreading rumours about the coronavirus being SARS (which is clearly untrue, Covid-19 is not SARS) and he himself haven't done the proper confirmation, so Chinese government step in to curb the spread of unproven rumours that's all. "The world didn't take it seriously because we were blindly watching bunch of idiots lying and silencing people and not realising the true scale of this!" What sort of lame excuse is this? You were just "blindly watching," instead taking preparations for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto your shores? You people knew Wuhan was under lockdown, you just ignored it and now you blame China for not warning you?
    1
  17643.  @FirstNameLastName-vw7ol  Trump actually praised China's efforts and transparency in handling the coronavirus outbreak, so what "blindly watching" are you talking about? Source: Trump praises China 'efforts and transparency' on Wuhan virus straitstimes.com/world/united-states/trump-praises-china-efforts-and-transparency-on-wuhan-virus
    1
  17644.  @PyroMax  Hey, why are you stalking me?
    1
  17645. Most of the world don't even recognize Taiwan at all, except as part of China.
    1
  17646.  @MarkYeung1  Speaking of Evergrande, there's some good news: the company managed to avoid a default with a $83.5 million payment just before the deadline.
    1
  17647.  @MarkYeung1  During the 2020 Tokyo Olympics there was also censorship of athletes crotches and Japan held firm on the ruling despite the backlash. This shows that every country has censorship of some sort.
    1
  17648.  @MarkYeung1  Evergrande Avoids Default With Last-Minute Bond Payment youtu.be/5ZoKq9Aw_S8
    1
  17649.  @MarkYeung1  Evergrande has avoided a default by with a $83.5 million payment just before the deadline. Video: Evergrande avoids default with last-minute payment youtu.be/TO2gc8tbfjo
    1
  17650.  @MarkYeung1  I'm showing you that there was censorship during the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. Why are you seemingly okay with Japanese censorship but against Chinese censorship then?
    1
  17651.  @MarkYeung1  The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government (Beijing). Declassified CIA files have exposed that a total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) So here we have concrete evidence that the 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the USA to engage in separatist activities against the Central People's Government.
    1
  17652.  @MarkYeung1  Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Costs
    1
  17653.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Censorship has universal guidelines." What universal guidelines are you talking about? There is no international standards on censorship, so what international guidelines are you referring to? I am pointing out Japanese censorship during the 2020 Tokyo Olympics, and if you're okay with it, then why are you against Chinese censorship then?
    1
  17654.  @MarkYeung1  But who are the Western countries to impose their "freedoms" onto China? China has worked with the developing world (i.e. African countries, South American countries, South East Asian countries) without interference in each other's political affairs, then who are the Western countries to interfere with China's internal political affairs?
    1
  17655.  @zackk4969  Only a director and film-maker? Why not take a look at what the former Director of the CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo said, that "We lied, We cheated, We stole." Video: Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' youtu.be/DPt-zXn05ac
    1
  17656.  @zackk4969  It's your own country's athletes loss if you decide to boycott the 2022 Beijing Olympics. More gold medals for China, Russia and other countries then...
    1
  17657.  @zackk4969  Then explain why China has the world's largest population at 1.4 billion people, if we "eat baby"? What's this renowned Chinese author's actual name in Chinese characters so that I can research it?
    1
  17658.  @zackk4969  Like I said, it's the Western athletes' loss if Western countries boycott the 2022 Beijing Olympics. More gold medals for China and other non-Western countries then...
    1
  17659.  @vijaynagaraj3674  "Vladivostok was never chinese (han), it was part manchuria which itself is occupied by China." It was the Manchus that conquered Ming Dynasty China and incorporated Manchuria into Qing Dynasty China. Just like earlier the Mongols conquered Song Dynasty China and incorporated Mongolia into Yuan Dynasty China, so it wasn't the Han Chinese that occupied those regions, it was those regions that choose to integrate Manchuria and Inner Mongolia into China.
    1
  17660.  @vijaynagaraj3674  The whole "China claiming Vladivostok" was exaggerated by Indian media such as WION TV blasting Beijing and attempting to portray China as having an insatiable appetite for territory. Times Now, one of the biggest Indian media outlets also published an article talking about Chinese expansionism in Russia, Nepal and Bhutan, but the truth is that Russia and China have resolved our border disputes. It was Indian media's attempt to inflame hatred for China among their Indian audiences.
    1
  17661.  @vijaynagaraj3674  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated their territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors did a similar thing with Tibet during Qing Dynasty China. Tibet broke free of China in 1913, but was eventually reincorporated back into China by 1951. Even the Indian PM Nehru had recognized Tibet as part of China, so did USA, UK, Australia, Canada, NZ, EU countries today. Just draw the Map of China and Tibet is clearly recognized as part of China today.
    1
  17662.  @vijaynagaraj3674  "神州 Shenzhou India has first hand experience of Chinese hunger for expansion. India got independence from British in 1947 and inherited the border." Before colonial rule, India was consists of several small individual kingdoms that were unified through British colonization, and India's borders were artificially drawn by their colonial masters. The McMahon line is one example, when Qing dynasty fell, the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) inherited Qing Dynasty's territories and fought to reclaim China's territories, yet ROC wasn't a party to discussions when McMahon Line was drawn. The British had recognized China's suzerainty over Tibet, and promised not to enter negotiations with Tibet except through the intermediary of the Chinese Government. According to Convention Between Great Britain and Russia (1907) The Governments of Great Britain and Russia recognizing the suzerain rights of China in Thibet. ... Article II. In conformity with the admitted principle of the suzerainty of China over Thibet, Great Britain and Russia engage not to enter into negotiations with Thibet except through the intermediary of the Chinese Government. Source: Convention Between Great Britain and Russia (1907) But when McMahon Line was drawn, it was done without any consultation from China by Britain and Tibet, and Britain had bypassed the Chinese intermediary and discussed with Tibet directly, which goes against their own convention.
    1
  17663.  @vijaynagaraj3674  Why don't you tell the non-Native Americans, Canadians, Australians, etc to Get Out of America and Australia and leave those lands to Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals then? Tibet was part of China for more than the entire colonial history of the United States. The First Indian PM, Jawaharlal Nehru had recognized Tibet as part of China, and even today, Tibet is recognized as part of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳. I mean, just look up the current map of China, and Tibet is clearly regarded as part of China. U.S Presidents like Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Barack Obama, George W Bush, etc, all recognize Tibet as part of China, ever since Nixon's visit to China. Also, Imperial Japan failed to conquer all of China during the 2nd Sino-Japanese War, whereas historically, the Mongols and Manchus conquered Song Dynasty China and Ming Dynasty China respectively. But even though China was conquered, the Mongols (in Inner Mongolia) and Manchus (Manchurai) eventually assimilated into Chinese culture, that's why their respective ruling periods over China were the Yuan Dynasty and Qing Dynasty. I mean, even India invaded and annexed Goa, Daman and Diu in 1961, about a decade after the Tibet was reincorporated back into the China in 1951. If you can accept India reclaiming those historically Indian territory, then can't you accept China reclaiming our historically territory of Tibet?
    1
  17664.  @vijaynagaraj3674  It appears that you have double standards. If you accept India claiming Goa, Daman and Diu through historical grounds, then can't China also do the same for Tibet? The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (Chinese: 中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议, Tibetan: བོད་ཞི་བས་བཅིངས་འགྲོལ་འབྱུང་ཐབས་སྐོར་གྱི་གྲོས་མཐུན་དོན་ཚན་བཅུ་བདུན) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves, acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Even back then Indian PM Nehru recognized Tibet as part of China, so did U.S presidents after Nixon, such as Bush, Obama, Trump, and even now Biden. Even other world leaders like British PM Johnson, French President Macron, Canadian PM Trudeau, Australian PM Morrison, German Chancellor Merkel (and now Olaf) they all recognize Tibet as part of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳. Just draw the Map of China, and Tibet is clearly regarded as part of Chinese territory.
    1
  17665.  @vijaynagaraj3674  By your logic, so since the majority of the people in Kashmir (which India calls "Pakistan Occupied Kashmir") are Muslims then that means Kashmir should belong to Pakistan right? Yet why is India eyeing Pakistan territory in Kashmir? And if you to accuse others of being a communist party member, then all those world leaders (including India's first PM Nehru) recognise Tibet as part of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 are they all communist members just for doing so?
    1
  17666.  @vijaynagaraj3674  "神州 Shenzhou Kashmir has always been part of India." So was Tibet a historical part of China! If you can accept India annexing Kashmir, Goa, Daman and Diu (also Manipur and many others) based on historical grounds, then can't you accept China claiming Tibet on historical grounds as well? I previously explained Tibet being historically part of China during the Yuan Dynasty and Qing Dynasty, so why are you applying double standards when it comes to India's historical claims compared to China's? And Pakistan is a sovereign country (as recognised by India) that shares the same parallel history as India right up to the 1947 partitioning of India forming two separate countries. India also supported Bangladesh independence from East Pakistan, causing Pakistan to lose their territory and forming another sovereign country, Bangladesh, and incurring Pakistan suspicion towards India. As for Kashmir, Pakistan has the same historical claim to Kashmir as India (they share the same history after all) and since the majority of the Kashmiris are Muslims, then they should belong to Pakistan right?
    1
  17667.  @vijaynagaraj3674  "神州 Shenzhou Kashmir has always been part of India. That's internal to India." "神州 Shenzhou India never annexed Kashmir." Such hypocrisy! You accept India's claim to Kashmir, Goa, Manipur, etc based on historical reasons but you won't accept China's claim to Tibet for the same historical reasons, then it's you who apply double standards with regards to India's and China's historical claims. You accuse China of being occupiers and expansionists, yet you conveniently overlook it when India does the same to Kashmir, Goa, Manipur and other states like Tripura and Nagaland.
    1
  17668. Jackson Hinkle and Alex Christoforou have been banned by YouTube? I watched those channels!
    1
  17669. Tibet and Xinjiang were conquered by Mongolians and incorporated into Yuan Dynasty China about 800 years ago during Mongol Empire.
    1
  17670. In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned corporations for China's benefit, reining them in when they stray too far. Whereas in United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit, at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    1
  17671.  @eatmoreburgers5918  Wasn't there a leak that revealed American billionaires like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffett, Geoge Soros, etc paid little to no taxes to the American government?
    1
  17672.  @eatmoreburgers5918  Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping there are ongoing anti-corruption campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the party. But when is the last time the United States have an anti-corruption campaign of their own? Hilary Clinton is corruption politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential Campaign, yet even after he became president, no action been taken against Clinton for corruption. And which of the American billionaires Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffett, Geoge Soros, have been punished for paying no tax? In China, the Chinese government controls the Chinese companies for China's benefit, reining in them when they gone too far. But in the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of the ordinary Americans, waging wars in the Middle East (Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Yemen War, etc) so that the U.S military industrial complex can justify a high U.S military budget.
    1
  17673.  @eatmoreburgers5918  You said: "Hillary did both and in my mind that makes her not innocent." The one with the wordplay here is you. You're basically admitting that Clinton is corrupt, then why hasn't any punishment been meted out to corrupt politicians like Clinton? It clearly shows that most Americans turn a blind eye (most even forgotten about Clinton's corruption) and claiming "turns out it was nothing" is only emboldening the corrupt people in the U.S system. You said: "doesnt mean the us is nearly as corrupt as the ccp and its corporations who rob the country through insurance fraud." In China, the punishment for fraud is the death penalty, and Chinese government have executed many individuals for fraud over the years. For example: -Zeng Chengjie was convicted of illegal fund raising 3.45 billion yuan, and defrauding 57,000 investors and sentenced to death. -Luo Yaping called the "Land Ma'am" was accused of embezzling 32.39 million yuan ($5.14 million) of public funds while she was working in Fushin city in the urban planning and land use department and sentenced to death. -Song Wendai was sentenced to death for illegally obtaining shares of the company and embezzling 87 million yuan ($13.87 million) in public funds and assets including gold and silver. -A 30-year-old Chinese woman Wang Caiping was sentenced to death for cheating investors of 100.11 million yuan ($16 million). -Wu Ying aka 'Rich Sister' was sentenced to death in December 2009 by the the Jinhua Intermediate People’s Court in Zhejiang for defrauding investors of about $60.2 million. -Wang Liming, a former accounting officer at China Construction Bank in the central province of Henan, worked with others to steal 20 million yuan ($2.4 million) from the bank using fake papers -Du Yimin was convicted of illegally raising 700 million yuan ($103 million). She is said to have promised investors high returns but instead used them to buy apartments, cars and other luxury goods for herself. She was sentenced to death by an intermediate court in March 2008, and was executed in August 2009. -Si Chaxian was found guilty of raising $24 million from 300 people and promising high returns. Si was executed in August 2009 on the same day as Du Yimin. -Ying Guoquan defrauded the government of 12 million yuan, which he gave to senior executives and was sentenced to death. -Wang Yang was sentenced to death in 2003. He was accused of raising about 253 million yuan ($37 million) by promising high interest rates and then using the funds for his personal expenses. -Wang Zhendong found guilty of defrauding investors of $416 million in an ant-breeding scheme was executed in October 2008. .... So clearly, in China, the Chinese government controls the corporations for China's benefit and reins in companies including the execution of individuals for fraud, whereas in the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the ordinary American's expense, getting away scot free with corruption.
    1
  17674.  @eatmoreburgers5918  "神州 Shenzhou also corporations banning trump from their accounts for his spread of terrible misinformation and constant inflammatory comments is hardly corruption." Read my statement, I said that is an example of rich U.S corporations controlling the U.S government, given that they can effectively silence the then President of the United States by banning his account.
    1
  17675.  @eatmoreburgers5918  The recent Pandora Papers leak also exposed widespread "tax evasion" through offshore bank accounts and assets in tax havens, by many world leaders including former British PM Tony Blair.
    1
  17676.  @eatmoreburgers5918  You said that almost everyone hated Trump, then why did Trump receive over 70 million voted for Trump during the 2020 election? That's nearly halve of all those who voted during that election.
    1
  17677.  @eatmoreburgers5918  But here you have an example of the rich U.S corporations controlling the U.S government by banning the account of then POTUS at that time. And the reason why Trump relied on Twitter is because Trump doesn't trust the U.S media to correctly report his words to the people, the U.S media will incorporate their own slant to his words (or twist his words altogether).
    1
  17678.  @eatmoreburgers5918  "神州 Shenzhou lol go look up his tweets and see if they are "twisting his words."" We can't now, because Trump's Twitter account has been banned. And at least we know that his earlier tweets represent Trump's words without Western MSM twisting his words. Yet now here we have an example of the power that the rich U.S corporations have over the U.S government where they can silence the then POTUS, yet here you are acting like the U.S corporations don't control the U.S government. Haven't you heard of how the 1% control the 99% in the USA? You said: "americans actually have good reason for making an alliance against china(human right violations. south china sea and its obvious abuse of international law, constant military threats towards the country of taiwan, cultural genocide, obvious games they play with international hostages to leverage power, constant trade fits if a country wishes to investigate something in china)" China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here, not China. And if you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of all the territory Taiwan claims (Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  17679.  @eatmoreburgers5918  "神州 Shenzhou yup just like half the peolpe in china tricked into thinking the ccp has any desire for the good of regular Chinese folk." But regular folk in China have seen our lives changed and vastly improved in the time that the Communist Party has been in power. Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made-In-China), having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. You said: "神州 Shenzhou i already tried to explain to you how companies can escape taxes without their home gov. really able to do anything about it. And btw don't act chinese companies arent doing the literal exact same, its an issue worldwide so its dumb to accuse foreign nations of a worldwide phenomenon." China's anti-corruption campaign has not only targeted corrupt officials inside the country, but has taken measures to track those who have fled overseas. Operation Sky Net, the global hunt for corrupt Chinese fugitives, has seen positive results since it was launched in 2014. Again, this is the example of how in China, the Chinese government controls the corporations for China's benefit, instead of the corporations controlling the government like in the United States. Video: China Footprint: Operation Sky Net hunts down corrupt officials hiding overseas youtu.be/hx4p7MsM0og You said: "Western societies information thrive off of research and reporting, even if it still sometimes comes out flawed. The ccp thrives off of propaganda and censorship." But in Western countries, literally anyone can put on a journalist cap and film something, pretending that they have done research, and this results in spreading of fake news (like a second pandemic) as well as incitement to cause riots, because the media is unregulated. Whereas in China, the news is regulated to weed out the fake news so that people can't just incite riots as they please. You said: "i would trust a system that isn't beholden to anything except reporting and view number rather than a system that encourages censorship of chinese criticism and blatant propaganda any day lol" But if Chinese media is controlled by the government (for China's benefit really) then Western MSM is controlled by the corporations, Wall Street, and the U.S military-industrial complex, who make use of MSM to further their agendas at the detriment of ordinary American citizens. Western MSM is not about truthful reporting, their news are more about sensationalism than actual journalism, and any journalist who speaks out against the general Western narrative might find their jobs threatened by their corporate employers.
    1
  17680.  @eatmoreburgers5918  How is it a lie? Go and read Taiwan's constitution, they claim all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Video:youtu.be/uqNA7WW3YFE Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan still claims those territory as part of theirs.
    1
  17681.  @eatmoreburgers5918  How am I being VERY nationalistic, just by showing that Chinese people's lives have vastly improved under the Communist Party of China? You're the one making the claim that "half the peolpe in china tricked into thinking the ccp has any desire for the good of regular Chinese folk." then where's proof of your claim? A joint Harvard University and Ash Center Study has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the CPC, yet you claim Chinese people are being tricked? You said: "your idea the the media is controlled by corporations is stupid af because western media doesnt work that way. corporations CANT control what the media dictates or else some other cometitor would expose them." American media is literally owned by conglomerates, why is this concept so hard to understand for you? The competitors of the conglomerates have long been since eliminated from the competition, so they are unable to "expose them". 6 major conglomerates (i.e Comcast, Walt Disney, 21st Century Fox, Time Warner, CBS, Viacom) hold interests in film production, cable and broadcast television, news, sports, music and online streaming. Video: Who Owns The Media? youtu.be/awRRPPE3V5Q
    1
  17682.  @eatmoreburgers5918  So you agreed that Taiwan claims all of mainland China, then why are you accusing me of lying? Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. And the fact that Taiwan is unable to declare independence, indicates that Taiwan is being controlled, and therefore, not independent. And yes, the Kuomintang once controlled the mainland, but the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 (1949~) and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan). During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates the KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the Communists rights to rule China.
    1
  17683.  @eatmoreburgers5918  "神州 Shenzhou i just wanted you to expose yourself that you werent telling the whole truth." I was telling the truth, Taiwan clearly claims all of mainland China under their constitution, and since there hasn't been any amendments or modifications to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan claims all of mainland China. Yet you accuse me of lying when I was simply telling the truth? You said: "The nation of Taiwan has to "claim china" in order for its safety from the CCP." Then according to your words, it clearly shows that Taiwan is being controlled by the Communist Party, since it is unable to declare independence without severe consequences from Beijing. So why are you claiming that Taiwan is a nation when it is clearly not independent? You said: "purposefully misleading people to support the face of the CCP? and in such a severe way(forcing a nation not to publicly claim sovereignty?)" Misleading? I literally shown that China has since transformed from a once dirt-poor country in the past into an economic juggernaut today under the Communist Party of China, then why can't I give credit where credit is due? And according to Taiwan's constitution, Taiwan claims all of mainland China, how am I misleading you when I'm telling you the truth? You said: "神州 Shenzhou btw suppressing a countries public claim to independance is very severe." Countries have been doing this, look at the Catalonia independence movement being suppressed by Spain. Or the California independence movement, which would require an amendment to the United States constitution. You said: "If the CCP could only actually enact any of their suppressive laws on its "territory" then it would be a "war for independance" of actual resistance and violent oppression." Then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations and the World Health Organization? If Taiwan was truly independent, and the CPC couldn't controll Taiwan, then Taiwan should have joined the UN and WHO long ago as an independent country, and yet Taiwan is unable to. So doesn't this show that Taiwan not independent? You said: "神州 Shenzhou Why do you openly mislead so much? this is why the things you say should be taken with such a grain of salt and you say your not heavily nationalistic lol." Why should what I say be taken with a grain of salt? Because I express a view that differs from yours? You said: "taiwans is being diplomatically, economically, and threateningly controlled by china." Because Taiwan is part of China after all, even Taiwan's constitution says that Taiwan is part of China. There is no declaration of independence by Taiwan. You said: "nobody non-nationalistic would attribute all of a countries success to purely their gov." But the communists are the primary reason why China is so successful today, then can't I give credit where credit is due? You said: "Unless you dont know the history of your own gov? The KMT never ruled china. The CCP and the KMT joined forces to defeat the original warlord government. but they still hated eachother. Nor did the outnumber the CCP" The KMT administered Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) but was eventually overthrown by the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 (1945~). And during the Chinese Civil War, the communists were heavily outnumbered there were only 50 members in the beginning of 1921, compared to million army strong KMT. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, heavily outnumbered, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan). This should already demonstrate KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China. You said: "The KMT eventually wanted to purge the communists(mainly CCP members) by limiting the amount on gov" The KMT actually did purge 5000-10,000 communists during the Shanghai massacre of 12 April 1927 and started the whole Chinese Civil War. And when the Imperial Japanese invaded Manchuria, Chiang Kai-Shek of the KMT was unwilling to meet the invaders head-on, instead he continued killing communists (our fellow Chinese brethren) until 2 of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap Chiang in order to get him to ally with the communists against the Japanese. This incident was known as the Xi'an Incident Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was thanks to communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release, which he then agreed to form a united front against the Japanese invaders. You said: "If you really believe what you are saying you need to stop sucking up whatever history the CCP gives you and actually do outside reading." I did outside reading, I read Wikiepdia: Chinese Civil War, Xi'An Incident and other articles on the Chinese Civil War, they all demonstrate that the incompetent KMT initially had massive wealth (taxed from peasants) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the dirt-poor, ill-equipped, outnumbered, starving Communist peasants, and yet despite these initial advantages, the KMT lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Taiwan. You said: "then they make it seem like the CCP was a bunch of outnumbered farmers with pitchforks who rose up against an incompetent gov." That's precisely what happened, the KMT despite their various initial advantages, lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor communists and had to flee to Taiwan. Back then literally nobody expected the communist's victory over the KMT, yet fast forward till today and look at how far China has come under the Communist party rule? From just 50 members in 1921, the CPC today is among the world's largest political parties today at 90 million members (about the population size of Germany) whereas the KMT has shrunk to a small political party in Taiwan. You said: "I mean the CCP has the good of the CCP in mind not the people. I dont know why you make it seem like im saying the CCP can never tdo good to the people as every gov." Because that's what you said, and I quote your earlier words: "神州 Shenzhou yup just like half the peolpe in china tricked into thinking the ccp has any desire for the good of regular Chinese folk." You said: "so much of what you say is wrong. western media is more than a few media corps A. and B. they dont come in and bar you from speaking about things." I literally just linked you a video shows how rich U.S corporations control the U.S media and those 6 conglomerates own everything in American media and don't face competition from smaller firms, because the smaller firms have been long since eliminated or gobbled up. And no, American Media does bar you from speaking about certain things that do not fit the U.S corporations agenda. According to American linguist and political activist, Noam Chomsky, the U.S media operate through 5 filters: ownership, advertising, the media elite, flak and the common enemy. Video: Noam Chomsky - The 5 Filters of the Mass Media Machine youtu.be/34LGPIXvU5M This is evident in how people like me, who offer a different view to the Western narrative, readily get dismissed by you as being "wumao" just for speaking positive things about China under the communist party, it goes to show how much control American media (and by extension, the U.S corporations) has over you, that you're unaware of how much U.S corporations control the U.S government and U.S media.
    1
  17684.  @eatmoreburgers5918  The whole truth is that Taiwan claims all of mainland China as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan's stance is that they claim mainland China, so why are you accusing me of lying? And since you agreed that ROC claims those territory for decades and cannot change this claim, that means you agree that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. So you're admitting Taiwan can't even declare independence? That means that Taiwan is being controlled by the Communist Party, and thus isn't an independent country isn't it? And most of the world acknowledge the One China policy that Taiwan is part of China. Even during the recent phone call Biden agreed that Taiwan is part of China. Even Trump agreed that Taiwan is part of China while he was still president, after a phonecall with President Xi.
    1
  17685.  @eatmoreburgers5918  I mean, why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 (1949~) and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, nobody expected a Communist victory, yet fast forward till today and look at how far China has gone under the communist party? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the Communists right to rule China.
    1
  17686. @HYUNWOO JUNG said "China needs to make efforts to change N.Korea first" Firstly, China has always wanted to do more business in N. Korea and open up N. Korea economy. But we can't do more with N. Korea, because the United States slapped heavy sanctions on N. Korea, and cripple their economy. Can't you see who is Korea's true enemy here?
    1
  17687. @HYUNWOO JUNG Who says business is impossible in North Korea? N. Korean companies are willing to do business overseas with the rest of the world, but the United States is constantly imposing crippling sanctions on N. Korean companies, and punish any companies found to be violating U.S sanctions. Don't you heard in the news about several companies being punished just for simply doing business with N. Korea? How do you expect N. Korea's economy to prosper with such sanctions in place?
    1
  17688. @HYUNWOO JUNG You know why N. Korea needs nuclear weapons? Because United States declared war with N. Korea and invaded Korean soil. So why should N. Korea give up its trump card you tell me? Also, everyone who is smart, knows that if North Korea ever launches an unprovoked nuclear assault against any other country, they will be annilated by USA and even China too. And there are so many other dictatorships countries in the world, like Saudi Arabia for example and many African countries. Yet businesses can still open shops in those countries. So why can't businesses do the same thing in North Korea then? Because the United States slap crippling sanctions on N. Korea that's why, and severely hinder its growth. I mean, which N. Korean missile is capable of hitting the US mainland you tell me? Why is N. Korea a threat then?
    1
  17689. @HYUNWOO JUNG Both North and South Korea territories are still Korean soil is it not? Then why can't North Korea attempt to unify Korea then? Its their Korean soil as well. Also, as far as I know, no Chinese PLA troops or Soviet Union troops were ever sent to N. Korea in 1948, and the invading force consists of N. Koreans themselves. And why are you being so defensive about USA, when it is clear that USA is one of the two culprits who divided the once unified Korea?
    1
  17690. @HYUNWOO JUNG N. Korea threaten the U.S? Look at North Korea's army and look at U.S. Army. How exactly is N. Korea a threat to USA? Can any of N. Korea's missiles fly halfway across the globe and attack the U.S mainland? Then how exactly is the N. Korea considered a credible threat to the mighty U.S.A you tell me? And about Chinese supporting N. Korea, N. Korea is our ally and they aided the communists during Chinese Civil War, so why can't China support N. Korea then? Chinese businesses want to do more business in N. Korea and help open up N. Korea's economy, develop its infrastructure and so on, but we can't do anything when US sanctions are limiting Chinese-North Korean cooperation.
    1
  17691. @HYUNWOO JUNG So wasn't the USA also breaking the international law by breaking into North Korea territory? The U.S forces pushed North Korea forces back past the 38th Parallel and deep into North Korean territory isn't it? They even pushed them back right up to China's doorstep with Korea in the Liaoning province, so who is the international law breaker here? Why is USA interfering in an internal civil war within Korea in the first place? Chinese troops were indeed sent after N.Korea request, because N. Korea is our ally and N. Korea aided the Chinese communists in mainland China during the Chinese Civil War, so Chinese PLA troops answered their request after all. And Korea would have been unified in the first place had the USA not first interfered in the Korean War itself. I mean, why is Korea even divided into North Korea (USSR) and South Korea (USA) in the first place? If there was no division of Korea, then there would be no need for unification. There would be no Korea War, and so many soldiers and civilians lives would have been saved. And Korean families would never have been separated and would be reunified today. Korea would have access to all available land and resources and without the U.S. crippling sanctions on N. Korea (since there is no Korean War), Korea would be an even greater Asian power today. But it isn't today. Because the USA is clearly one of the culprits behind the division of Korea. And China had nothing do with the division of Korea and the USA is clearly stymieing N. Korea's economy by slapping crippling sanctions. And worst, the Korean people are beginning to no longer see themselves as a once unified single country any more. I mean, its your country and your brother country here. Why you let your country arrive at this state?
    1
  17692. @HYUNWOO JUNG N. Korea killing their people? North Koreans are starving to death, because the United States slap sanctions on them and restrict their economic growth. How is N. Korea going to prosper when there are such sanctions in place? China is sending humanitarian aid in the form of food and medicine to N. Korea to help alleviate the problems, but our help is limited because of US sanctions. I mean you keep on blaming China, China, China, then what exactly is South Korea doing to help the North you tell me? It's S. Korea's own brother country that is suffering here, and China is trying to help, yet you keep on blaming China for mistakes that the Koreans are making? Who do you think you are? Why don't Koreans solve their own problems by themselves, instead of involving China and the US in their war? Who is suffering here but Koreans themselves? Like I said, which N. Korea missile can reach the US mainland you tell me? N. Korean missile technology is currently unable to reach the U.S mainland. And why would N. Korea want to start an unprovoked war with USA (which would result in N. Korea's annilation by USA and also by China) ? N. Korea is still technically at war with the USA, so why can't N. Korea keep missiles as their trump card? Did you know in 2016, it was revealed that North Korea approached the United States about conducting formal peace talks to formally end the Korean war? N. Korea want's the war to end, but USA won't let them sign a peace treaty and remove those sanctions. You've seem to show a shallow understanding of the situation on the Korean peninsula. Why don't you analyse the situation closely, instead of hurling ad hominen attacks against me?
    1
  17693. @HYUNWOO JUNG You aren't reading what I wrote. I said Korea should be unified by Koreans themselves. If North Korea succeeds, so be it. If South Korea succeeds (without US help) so be it. But an American-assisted South Korean unification is clearly an attempt to make Korea a US puppet and China will oppose it. As for N Korea being "hell" that's because USA declared war on N. Korea and and slap sanctions on it, that's why N Korea is so poor. Also, USA pump funds into South Korea and South Korea also enjoys US protection (US bases in South Korea) and can afford to spend less money on its military, whereas N Korea has to spent lots of money on defense against the USA. Every country has to invest money in defense, but South Korea can spend less on defense and channel funds to developing its economy instead. So it is clear that South Korea enjoys US favoritism and that's why its more prosperous than North Korea, which is technically still at war with USA and also limited by sanctions too.
    1
  17694. @HYUNWOO JUNG Nobody is ever ready for war. Was Poland ready for Germany invasion? The thing is that prior to Korean war, the North was more prosperous than the South. North Korea had stronger industry, a stronger military and higher GDP than South Korea prior to the war. South Korea on the other hand, was dirt-poor and had GDP lower than even some sub-Saharan African countries! That's why North Korea was able to conquer 99% of South Korea, before the USA declared war against it. And you are clearly a US puppet already. Look, all your words support the USA, and constantly defend US actions blindly. You're just regurgitating what your American masters told you that's all, instead of deeply analysing the political situation. You even begin to regard your own brother state as a separate country altogether, because the USA has been feeding you lies to develop enmity against your fellow Korean brothers. How is Korea ever going to reunify like that? You treat your own brother state as an enemy, because your American masters trained you to as well as to never attack your own master.
    1
  17695. @HYUNWOO JUNG France and UK declared war on Germany because Germany invaded another country Poland. But North Korea is trying to reunify its divided country so that isn't an invasion of another country isn't it? Its an internal civil war within Korea and it should be fought by the Koreans themselves isn't it? I mean, imagine an alternative history, when during the American Civil War for example, the North was just about to unify with the South and form the United States of America. But before that, suddenly a foreign power (say for example, Britain) decided to declare war on the winning side and prevent America from unifying. Then America would be stuck in a state where there are 2 Americas and both claiming to be the rightful America themselves. This hypothetical scenario is exactly the case Korea is facing today. Even today, Chinese troops have clearly withdrawn from North Korea, and there are ZERO Chinese military bases in North Korea. Whereas there is still a significant US base presence in South Korea, so aren't US troops the obstacle preventing Korean reunification? As for Chinese support to North Korea, I have already mentioned many times that Chinese businesses would love to expand N. Korea's economy and promote better business ties with N. Korea, but we can't do anything when US sanctions are in place. If Japanese industry remained in the North, then its too bad USA decided to make South Korea is own. I mean, why divide Korea up in the first place? You keep saying Korea was under Chinese political interference and you don't want to return to the darker times. But frankly, pre-WWII Korea (Joseon Dynasty) was a strong power while it was a unified country, able to access both the territories of the North and the South, and to use all available resources and manpower to full effect. But look at Korea now and its a shadow of its former self. Half of your land and resources are inaccessible to you, your Northern brethren are starving because of crippling US sanctions, and the South relies on US military presence for defense while the North relies on China for trade. Look at the sad state of Korea today and do you really think the Korea of the past was dark times?
    1
  17696.  @garymcmillan6943  China was once a poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and China has transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (world's largest by GDP PPP), the factory of the world (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China.
    1
  17697.  @garymcmillan6943  China has was once a poor, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and China has transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (world's largest by GDP PPP), the factory of the world (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the communist party.
    1
  17698.  @garymcmillan6943  The Communist Party of China did that.
    1
  17699.  @garymcmillan6943  Like I said, China's success has been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China.
    1
  17700.  @omertarikozkose9514  Beard is not forbidden in Xinjiang, only the unruly, crescent-shaped beard of Islam is discouraged. Besides, the Uighur men look more handsome clean-shaven and the Uighur women look beautiful without their faces being covered by the ugly black Muslim headveil. The Uighurs weren't even Muslims in the first place and they had their own vibrant Uighur culture before the Islamic invaders conquered the region and converted the natives to Islam.
    1
  17701. Western anti-China propaganda is especially insidious compared to Chinese propaganda. Hardly anyone believes what Chinese media says, even though they cite data and statistics from primary sources. Whereas almost everyone just blindly believe Western propaganda even it's unsubstantiated by evidence.
    1
  17702.  @zackk4393  But according to Wikipedia: A Madman's Diary, the diary form was inspired by Nikolai Gogol's short story "Diary of a Madman", as was the idea of the madman who sees reality more clearly than those around him. It's a work of fiction, not based on a true story. Then why are you confusing fiction with reality?
    1
  17703.  @zackk4393  A Madman's Diary Synopsis (Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Madman%27s_Diary#Synopsis ) The story was inspired from a fiction entitled “Diary of a madman” written by Nikolai Gogol in 1834.
    1
  17704. Even after Crimea rejoined Russia (which the Western media claims as an "annexation") the United States wasn't willing to go to war with Russia for Ukraine's sake. Instead all Washington did was slap sanctions on Moscow, and there was no U.S-Russia over Crimea. Likewise, the people of Taiwan island should also realize that the USA isn't going to go to war with mainland China over Taiwan, after what happened with Russia and Crimea.
    1
  17705. It's like the Tortoise and the Hare. NATO is playing the role of the Hare, going all out on slapping sanctions on Russia, and pouring military aid to Ukraine, while mocking Russia for "being too slow". But now, NATO has exhausted their sanction options, and is running low on weapons to send to Ukraine, after such a massive burst of speed. Meanwhile, Russia is playing the world of the the Tortoise, slowly wearing down enemy forces and making steady progress, while conserving its energy for when its most needed later.
    1
  17706.  @violatedmonkey  The AUKUS deal meant that Australia will receive nuclear submarines from the US and the UK, even though Australia is a non-nuclear country and also a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) that forbids the spread of nuclear weapons/technology to non-nuclear states. If Australia wants to become a nuclear country, then they become potential targets for nuclear strikes, isn't it?
    1
  17707.  @markemailonly3114  What "modern government created Uighur culture" are you talking about? This is the Uighurs celebrating their own culture, cuisine, festivals, traditional clothing, traditional instruments, song and dance and Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV help promote Uighur culture which also attracts tourists to visit Xinjiang. How is this not "appreciating" Uighur culture? And it appears that whenever I ask you to substanciate your claims, you keep on changing your point without bothering to provide evidence of your claims. Uighur language is being taught in schools in Xinjiang, in fact communist party officials posted to Xinjiang have to pick up Uighur language as part of their duty. The road signs, street signs, store signs, restaurant menus in Xinjiang contain Uighur writing in them, so obviously the Uighur kids are being taught their language in school.
    1
  17708.  @markemailonly3114  Earlier you complained about Uighur's own unique culture and history are not appreciated enough and priority for their preservation be given by the state. But in fact it was China that applied for Uighur Muqam of Xinjiang to be put on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity in UNESCO. So how is this not priority given to preservation of Uighur culture given by the state?
    1
  17709.  @markemailonly3114  "神州 Shenzhou again, all these are secondary to the preservation of language." And again, how is the Uighur language not being preserved? It's literally written in the Renminbi Note. If you go to Xinjiang, the road signs, the street signs, store signs, restaurant menu have the Uighur script written on them, and the Uighur kids are speaking the language, then what are you talking about?
    1
  17710.  @markemailonly3114  But Uighur language is clearly being taught in Xinjiang schools. I just searched "Xinjiang schools" on YouTube and the first result by Daniel Dumbrill visiting a Uighur public school in Xinjiang shows students in Xinjiang taking lessons in their language.
    1
  17711.  @markemailonly3114  Because Mandarin is the business language of China. Certain topics like science, technology, engineering, have very technical terms that are difficult to teach in Uighur language, so Mandarin actually helps expands the Uighur students world compared to their Uighur language. Additionally, when Uighurs travel outside of China on tour groups, most countries cater to Mandarin speaking Chinese tourists. Media like video games, movies, comic books like manga (Manhua) and anime (Dongman) are in Chinese, and learning Mandarin actually unlocks better accessibly to those media. Also, let's get this straight, your original point was (and I quote your own words) "神州 Shenzhou China is certainly doing the opposite of Nazi Germany, its treating every Uyghur just like other Chinese," but I've already shown instances where Uighurs enjoy privileges over Han such as education, tax exemption, healthcare, and so on. Then you changed your point to "Uyhgur's own unique culture and history are not appreciated enough and priority for their preservation be given by the state." when I already shown that China applied for Uighur Muqam culture of Xinjiang to be recognized as an intangible cultural heritage under UNESCO, Then now you changed your point to its taught as a second language right now? Why are you constantly moving the goalpost each time your argument is cornered?
    1
  17712. I think Obama's pivot to Asia was when the U.S started painting China as the (perceived) enemy.
    1
  17713.  @trygd100  You said: "I boycott any thing made in China." China is home to 90% of the world's rare earth metals production. Rare Earths are used in technology like magnets and super magnets, motors, metal alloys, electronic and computing equipment, batteries, catalytic converters, petroleum refining, medical imaging, colouring agents in glass and ceramics, phosphors, lasers and special glass. Since you're boycotting everything made in China, have you gotten rid of all your products that contain rare earths from China?
    1
  17714.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou I think this would be a logical move for China. It will be an effective weapon." What move by China are you talking about? I'm simply telling people who don't want to buy anything made in China to get rid of products containing rare earths produced in China, since China is responsible for 90% of rare earths production. The list includes: magnets and super magnets, motors, metal alloys, electronic and computing equipment, batteries, catalytic converters, petroleum refining, medical imaging, colouring agents in glass and ceramics, phosphors, lasers and special glass.
    1
  17715.  @msimon6808  You said: "神州 Shenzhou The American mines have been shut down. They can be reopened." Reopening previously shut mines is not as simple as you've made it out to be. You'll need to clear up any blockage, restore crumbling tunnels, reestablish power, and you'll need to rehire miners, train them again and so on. Furthermore, the mine's yield may not reach the levels it once was, and also the next step is to process the ore, which requires construction of relevant facilities and rehiring people with technical expertise. And still, even if they get the whole process running again, those rare earth production is still not going to be as cheap as rare earths from China. The price of your products will increase if you use your own rare earths.
    1
  17716.  @msimon6808  You said: "Good thing China is self sufficient in food and oil." China is buying cheap Russian oil and gas at a discount, while European countries are rationing energy, turning off streetlamps at night, restricting hot water showers to a minimum, even cutting down trees for firewood, especially as winter approaches. At one point, China was selling excess LNG bought from Russia to Europe at a hefty profit. As for food, China can support 21% of the world's population with just 7% arable land, and still produce surplus food to export to other countries. We are home to world's largest pig farms, sheep farms, goat farms and duck farms. China's fishing industry makes up one-third of the world's reported fish production as well as two-thirds of the world's reported aquaculture production. China ranks top in the world in agricultural production, producing more wheat, cotton, lettuce, cabbage, green bean, green pea, cauliflower/brocolli, eggplant, potato, spinach, carrots, cucumber, pumpkin, sweet potato, tomato, pear, grapes, peach, apple, plums, strawberries, kiwifruit, watermelon, chestnut, peanut, walnut, chili pepper, garlic, eggs, than any other in the world. Source: Wikipedia: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities
    1
  17717.  @Andy-P  Those people who want to boycott everything Made-in-China, it seems that they are motivated by a intense resentment towards China. It appears, they don't want to see China prosper and succeed, that's why they proudly claim to boycott China and support U.S decoupling from China (an impossible task, given China's rare earth production).
    1
  17718.  @Andy-P  You said: "Blame America. Yes that may be the problem." There's no denying that Trump's tarriffs on China (which have yet to be lifted) as well as the U.S chip ban contributed to the problem.
    1
  17719.  @TacticalMayo  "Show his content to Americans and watch the reaction you get. I promise you it's not good." Cyrus Janssen's message is about Building Bridges, Not Walls, between the US and China, and that if US and China cooperate, the whole world benefits. I've quite certain that many Americans don't want war (they're probably sick of it), and would rather see relations between US and China improve, so they might even react positively to Cyrus' message.
    1
  17720.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Maybe unemployment because the Chinese economy needs to allocate more wealth to the household..." Allocating wealth to the household doesn't improve unemployment, in fact it might even exacerbate it by incentivizing people not to work.
    1
  17721. Shenzhen (深圳) "Deep Drain" was once a wetland fishing village, but under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, it has transformed into a futuristic city, home to the latest technologies, smartphones, cameras, gadgets, drones, Artificial Intelligence systems, robotics, automation, 5G, electric vehicles and so on.
    1
  17722.  @Aikúsoul  You said: "US has been supporting Taiwan for a hundred plus years" You are technically correct, the U.S has been pouring U.S money in support of the Nationalist Kuomintang during Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period. But the KMT was so corrupt that even U.S President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption, and wrote that the wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", having pocketed $750,000,000 in U.S aid.
    1
  17723.  @Aikúsoul  "US has been supporting Taiwan for a hundred plus years" You are technically correct, the U.S has been pouring money in support of the Nationalist Kuomintang since the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period. But corruption was rampant in the KMT and they pocketed some $750,000,000 in U.S aid, that even U.S President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption, and wrote that the wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves".
    1
  17724.  @Aikúsoul  You said: "Well how did China lose war against Japan when they set their mind on it ?" Again, what lost war? Imperial Japanese surrendered at the end of WWII, so how did China lose the war against the Japanese? What alternative reality are you living in?
    1
  17725.  The Orange Stool Sample  Do Canadians even remember the occupations of the two Michaels? Compared to Meng Wanzhou, whom everyone knows is the Huawei CFO?
    1
  17726.  @lc5176  You said: "In the coming 1-2 decades china's workforce will shrink dramatically," China is investing into robotics and automation in order to make up for the predicted shortfall in workers in the coming decades. In fact, China is already the largest market for automation. For example, we recently unveiled the Asia's first automated container port in Qingdao in China. The Port of Qingdao has set a record in terms of operation efficiency, and can even work throughout the night in complete darkness. You said: "That combined with China's increasing authoritarianism is stifling innovation and foreign investment. Time is very much against China." Could you explain how is China's authoritarianism stifling innovation? Why do you seem to think authoritarianism stifles innovation? As for foreign investment, China literally overtook the USA as the world's largest recipient of FDI (foreign direct investment) in 2020, having brought in $163 billion in inflows, compared to $134 billion attracted by the United States, according to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
    1
  17727.  @Aikúsoul  That's correct. China took back our occupied territories from Imperial Japan, so how exactly did China lose the war against Japan? Can't you see the obvious flaw in your logic, or do you need others to point it out to you?
    1
  17728.  @Aikúsoul  "神州 Shenzhou The proof is online there’s no need to even question me anymore have a nice day" The online proof shows that Imperial Japan lost WWII and that China emerged victorious against the Japanese after WWII, so how exactly did China lose the war against Japan?
    1
  17729.  VICtorian071  Whats going to happen to Trump's tariffs when he steps down? What if the next POTUS starts reversing Trump's policies, and lifting the US-China trade war tariffs? From what I heard, Trump's tariffs are extremely unpopular among Americans and its likely to be changed when Trump steps down.
    1
  17730.  Scott Mayfield  It is the USA that just unilaterally slap tariffs on steel and aluminum, without even going through the proper WTO channels! Even countries like India, Mexico, Turkey, South Korea, etc have lodge WTO complaints against Trump's tariffs! Source: South Korea lodges WTO complaint about US tariffs rt.com/business/416972-korea-us-wto-complaint/ Turkey lodges complaint at WTO over new US tariffs dw.com/en/turkey-lodges-complaint-at-wto-over-new-us-tariffs/a-45149432 India takes U.S. steel tariffs complaint to the WTO reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-india/india-takes-u-s-steel-tariffs-complaint-to-the-wto-idUSKCN1IO1WP Mexico to file WTO complaint over US tariffs dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/article-5805255/Mexico-file-WTO-complaint-US-tariffs-ministry.html
    1
  17731.  Scott Mayfield  But why President Trump just unilaterally slap tariffs on steel and aluminum like that? Without going through the proper WTO channels? Just like why Trump can just ban Huawei like that then?
    1
  17732. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17733. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  17734. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17735. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  17736. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  17737.  @stunningandbrave2520  At least it shows that another person shares the same view as me. Aren't we all entitled to our own views?
    1
  17738.  @stunningandbrave2520  "Of course, but it also carries no weight." How does me agreeing with another person carry no weight? Lee Kai-Fu is a renowned Venture Capitalist known to be an expert on Artificial Intelligence, yet you're just discounting his views?
    1
  17739.  @stunningandbrave2520  The "appeal to authority fallacy" only applies when a person cites an authority figure who is not qualified to make reliable claims about the topic at hand. But Lee Kai-Fu is a renowned Venture Capitalist known to be an expert on Artificial Intelligence, so how does it carry no weight?
    1
  17740.  @stunningandbrave2520  Go ahead and find one such expert then. Like I said, the fallacy only applies if the expert is not qualified to make reliable claims about the topic at hand. But Lee Kai-Fu is from a reputable background.
    1
  17741.  @ernahubbard2062  The National People's Congress (NPC) is the highest organ of state power and the national legislature of China, and the NPC and CPPCC meet together during what's called the "Two Sessions" to discuss China's direction and future, how's that a rubber stamp? Video: Live: Special program on 2021 Two Sessions – China's top legislature, the National People's Congress youtu.be/P8pQ24-HETY
    1
  17742.  @ernahubbard2062  Pompeo made accusations of human rights violation in Xinjiang, but he declined China's invitation to visit Xinjiang so doesn't that suggest that Pompeo doesn't want to see for himself the truth in Xinjiang, and choose to continue his anti-China narrative without visiting Xinjiang? Besides Pompeo, China also invited European diplomats to visit Xinjiang. Source: China to invite European diplomats to Xinjiang reuters.com/article/us-china-xinjiang-exclusive-idUSKCN1R10QQ
    1
  17743.  @ernahubbard2062  The US government flag posts on Facebook which they see as "problematic." Source: White House ‘flagging’ posts for Facebook to censor over COVID ‘misinformation’ nypost.com/2021/07/15/white-house-flagging-posts-for-facebook-to-censor-due-to-covid-19-misinformation/
    1
  17744. Agreed. Westerners always complain about Chinese tourists misbehaving, about poor traffic in China, cars running red lights, people jaywalking, spitting in public, etc. With this system, if your score falls too low, then you won't be allowed to fly to other countries, at least until your behavior improves and your score rises to acceptable range.
    1
  17745.  @angxiang3186  So why didn't Singapore slap sanctions against the United States for their invasions? Instead, Singapore slap sanctions on Russia for a country that isn't even in Singapore's interests to do so. In the end, Singapore has been listed on Russia's list of "unfriendly countries" so isn't Singapore playing right in to the U.S hands?
    1
  17746.  @angxiang3186  If anything, the discrepancy in Singapore being willing to slap sanctions against Russia, but not against the U.S for their invasion, just proves that Singapore's so-called "principles" mean nothing, if they can disregarded at anytime. Singapore's actions have demonstrated that it remains a U.S vassal. After all, Singapore hosts U.S military aircraft as well as the U.S Navy Aircraft Carrier that sailed to the South China Sea.
    1
  17747.  @angxiang3186  You said: "神州 Shenzhou U appears more so as a simpleton" Why are you seemingly resorting to hurling personal insults against me? Just because my views happen to differ from yours? If Singapore was truly about "principles" then they would have slapped sanctions on the U.S for their invasion, much like what they did against Russia. How am I a "simpleton" for pointing out Singapore's double standards here? Singapore recognizes the One China policy that Taiwan is part of China, yet Singapore's military trained in Taiwan in defiance of the mainland's will? It's clear that Singapore being militarily tied to the U.S means that it's a vassal. You said: "The new world is evolving n dynamic ~ u see only matters fixated and not fluid." I pointed out how Singapore slapped sanctions on Russia, thus earning it a place on Russia's list of "unfriendly countries" and for Ukraine that isn't even of any interest to Singapore. The new multipolar world that's emerging will surely include Russia, but Singapore has already chosen sides against it.
    1
  17748.  @MarkYeung1  Many Hong Kong people (but not all) still retain the subservient "colonial mentality" that plagues the people of former colonies. Even though the British have physically decolonized from Hong Kong, the "decolonization of the mind" is still incomplete, as many Hong Kongers (but not all) still worship the West and harbor a disdain for anything non-Anglo-Saxon in nature.
    1
  17749.  @MarkYeung1  For example, I've been to Hong Kong before, and when I open my mouth and speak Mandarin, many Hong Kongers (but not all) started treating me coldly. However, when I open my mouth and speak English, many Hong Kongers started warming up to me. A similar thing happens with people from Taiwan Island and Singapore speaking Mandarin to Hong Kongers. But obviously not all Hong Kongers are like this, many have embraced their Chinese roots.
    1
  17750.  @MarkYeung1  Tibet Autonomous Region was the target of CIA separatist activities. Did you know that the 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and a traitor to his people? The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government (Beijing). We know this because declassified CIA files have exposed that a total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) Source: Wikipedia: CIA Tibetan program So here we have concrete evidence that the 14th Dalai Lama received American funding to engage in separatist activities against the Central People's Government. The same thing happened in Hong Kong during the 2019 Hong Kong rioters so the government needs to root out foreign intervention in Hong Kong, like what happened in Tibet with CIA training Tibetan guerrillas.
    1
  17751.  @MarkYeung1  If you want to talk about racism in Canada, then sadly there's a surge in anti-Asian hate crimes being committed against people of Asian descent in Vancouver. According to Bloomberg, Vancouver is the Anti-Asian Hate Crime Capital of North America. Last year, more anti-Asian hate crimes were reported to police in Vancouver, a city of 700,000 people, than in the top 10 most populous U.S. cities combined. With almost 1 out of every 2 residents of Asian descent in British Columbia experiencing a hate incident in the past year, the region is confronting an undercurrent of racism that runs as long and deep as the historical links stretching across the Pacific.
    1
  17752.  @MarkYeung1  If he refuse to serve you because you don't speak Mandarin, then how is he going to serve other non-Mandarin speaking customers? It's Walmart's problem if they hire such a person isn't it? And again, it's the "colonial mentality" that makes many Hong Kongers (but not all) look down on mainlanders and tend see themselves as superior, so there needs to be "decolonization of the mind" else the Hong Kongers won't be free of the trappings of Western colonialism.
    1
  17753. ​ @MarkYeung1  You said: "there's a video that Hong Kong police drive his motorcycle toward the peaceful protestors. He was not charged." I watched that video, and firstly those protestors weren't peaceful, at the beginning, one of the them pushed the motorcycle officer (very dangerous as the police officer lose control of his bike) and when the motorcycle circled around, several protestors charged at the motorbike and attacked the officer, so how can you claim the protestors were peaceful? And secondly the police officer was suspended and was investigated.
    1
  17754.  @MarkYeung1  You want to talk about racism against Africans, just look at the African Americans getting shot/killed such as George Floyd, Ahmaud Abbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks, sparking off Black Lives Matter protests across the USA. Yet which person of African descent has been attacked and killed by Chinese in China? The problem with racism is when it result in attack and even deaths.
    1
  17755.  @MarkYeung1  Of course not all HongKongers are violent, I always try to include a (but not all) when I describe such groups of people. And if you talk about Chairman Mao to Westerners, many of them (but not all) disregard the good that Mao Zedong did, they only remembered the harm which when you look at it, wasn't actually caused by him in the first place and there were clearly other factors involved. But what has Mao even got to do with this discussion?
    1
  17756.  @MarkYeung1  Those empty apartments are gradually being filled up over the years. For example, Zhengzhou was once considered China's largest "ghost city" according to London Daily Mail in 2011. Fast forward till today and Zhengzhou had a population of 12,600,574 inhabitants as of the 2020 Chinese census, and the city had a total GDP of 1.014 trillion (RMB) in 2018.
    1
  17757.  @Offensively-normal  "Spoken like a true Communist." Why is someone being labelled a communist just for pointing out that Hong Kong has no military, foreign alliances, natural resources, farmland, water and other essentials?
    1
  17758.  @MarkYeung1  "Everyone knows that.😅" Why is someone being labelled a communist just for pointing out that Hong Kong has no military, foreign alliances, natural resources, farmland, water and other essentials? Hong Kong has no army of its own. Hong Kong was defended by the British Army before the handover, and now by the People's Liberation Army after the handover. Hong Kong citizens are even exempt from serving in the Chinese army, even though Hong Kong is part of China. Did you know that Hong Kong derives most of its freshwater from Dongjiang in the Guangdong province in the mainland? Hong Kong also imports 23% of its electricity needs from mainland China.
    1
  17759.  @MarkYeung1  Colonial mentality is the internalized perception of ethnic or cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization. This mindset is prevalent among many in Hong Kong (but not all of them). Such people display a ingrained preference for Anglo-Saxon culture over other "non-white" cultures, including their own. For example, when I speak Mandarin in Hong Kong, some people treated me coldly. But when I open my mouth and speak English, many Hong Kong people started warming up to me.
    1
  17760.  @MarkYeung1  Singapore only pays Malaysia a meager 3 cents for 1,000 gallons of water from Malaysia, of course anywhere else its going to be more than that. But Singapore has an army in which comprised of coerced conscription of men once they reach 18 years of age. Hong Kong citizens don't even have to serve in the People's Liberation Army, even though Hong Kong is part of China. Furthermore, 99% of Hong Kong's food is sourced from mainland China since agriculture, farming and fishery are insignificantly small in Hong Kong. Hong Kong also imports 23% of its electricity needs from mainland China.
    1
  17761.  @MarkYeung1  Mainlanders literally consider the people of Hong Kong (and also the people of Taiwan) as our brothers and sisters. Go ahead, you can ask any mainlander whether Hong Kong and Taiwan are part of China, and virtually every mainland Chinese will say yes. However, this is one-sided and you cannot say the same for how the people of Hong Kong and Taiwan view mainlanders. Many Hong Kongers (and also Taiwanese) see themselves as separate from mainland China.
    1
  17762.  @MarkYeung1  "This is why hundreds of thousands stand out to protest the extradition bill," Many of them were carrying United Kingdom 🇬🇧 flag and even the United States 🇺🇸 flag among the crowds, because they have the "colonial mentality" (like I've previously described). They feel that Chinese culture (their own culture) is inferior to that of their colonial masters. The colonizer not only colonize lands, but they also colonize the people's minds, through interactions and education systems. Even after the colonizers left, the people's minds remains enslaved and loyal to their former masters.
    1
  17763.  @MarkYeung1  "But if you are wondering how come Hong Kong erupted into protest, that's why." Hong Kong erupted into protest over what? Carrie Lam proposed the Hong Kong extradition bill after a Hong Konger (named Chan) flew to Taiwan with his pregnant girlfriend, and then proceeded to strangle her to death before flying back to Hong Kong and leaving her body for the Taiwanese authorities to discover. He has since confessed to the crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite him to face justice, but Hong Kong doesn't have an extradition agreement with Taiwan. Furthermore, Hong Kong courts are powerless to convict him when the crime occurred outside of Hong Kong, and that's why Carrie Lam drew up the extradition bill. But then the Hong Kong protest erupted over the bill, and even when Carrie Lam withdrew the bill in Sept, the Hong Kong protests continued.
    1
  17764.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "We are not separatists, we are not rioters." Explain why were the Hong Kongers carrying American Flags 🇺🇸 and British Flags 🇬🇧 during the protests, if they weren't separatists or rioters? Or why were people breaking shop windows and looting, damaging traffic lights and public property and throwing Molotov cocktails at the Hong Kong police, if they weren't rioters.
    1
  17765. coptic777 Then perhaps could you tell me where was the world's oldest gear or cogwheel located?
    1
  17766. coptic777 The pyramids are not themselves gears or cogs, and neither has any evidence of gears been found at that site.
    1
  17767.  Trolls Sucksdonkeyballs  Lol, maybe the USA submarine bumped into Cthulu under the ocean and awaken him from his slumber. Who knows? USA certainly don't...
    1
  17768. Steven Goodkin What do you mean? China blocked coal imports from North Korea after President Xi Jinping met President Trump in Maralargo meeting. But it was insufficient to curb North Korean missile test and dissuade it from pursuing its nuclear ambitions. So isn't obvious that trade sanctions have little effect on North Korea? Why continue to pursue this path, knowing that sanctions did not affect North Korea for years?
    1
  17769.  @bjrnhjortshjandersen1286  Not only did America lost the Vietnam War to communist Vietnamese peasants, but the U.S also lost the 20-year Afghan War against a bunch of insurgents, after pouring trillions of dollars into the Afghan War effort and leaving behind billions of dollars of U.S weapons for the Taliban. The democratically elected Afghan President Ghani fled the country with carloads of U.S cash, while the 300,000 strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban in weeks with minimal resistance. Just like how the U.S has no political will to fight in those wars, they also won't do the same if war breaks out in the Taiwan Strait.
    1
  17770.  @bjrnhjortshjandersen1286  China has national strategic plan Made in China 2025 中国制造2025 which aims to move away from being the "world's factory". The industrial policy aims to upgrade the manufacturing capabilities of Chinese industries, growing from labor-intensive workshops into a more technology-intensive powerhouse.
    1
  17771.  @bjrnhjortshjandersen1286  Not only did America lost the Vietnam War to communist Vietnamese peasants, but the U.S also lost the 20-year Afghan War against a bunch of insurgents. Just like how the U.S has no political will to fight in those wars, they also won't do the same if war breaks out in the Taiwan Strait.
    1
  17772.  @bjrnhjortshjandersen1286  China is already the world's largest exporter of high-tech goods, how is that not successful? Here's a list of countries/regions by high-tech exports in 2018 1. Mainland China (731 billion) 2. Hong Kong SAR (330 billion) 3. Germany (210 billion) 4. South Korea (192 billion) 5. United States (156 billion) 6. Singapore (155 billion) 7. France (117 billion) 8. Japan (111 billion) 9. Malaysia (90 billion) 10. Netherlands (85 billion) ... Source: YouTube: Top 20 Country by High-Technology Exports (1989-2019)
    1
  17773.  @bjrnhjortshjandersen1286  "神州 Shenzhou It is important to look at the reasons why the USA gave up those wars." It's because the Americans were sick of war and their U.S soldiers dying on foreign soil, so for what reason would the U.S want to involve themselves in a conflict over the Taiwan Strait? You said: "You may consider what is the attitude of the Taiwanese people....would China gain much by using force against people that do not want to become subjects to the PRC?" China would finally put an end to the Century of Humiliation, during which China was carved up like a pie (as illustrated in that infamous French cartoon) and our territories served to various Western powers. China has accepted that some pieces are no longer recoverable (i.e Vladivostok) but China has managed to regain Hong Kong and Macau. Taiwan island remains the last unclaimed piece that the mainland would spare no expense to reunify it. You said: "Remember neither the Ming nor the Qing dynasties managed to conquer the whole island." The Kuomintang were able to conquer the whole island, and since the KMT defines its state as the Republic of China then Taiwan is without a doubt part of Chinese territory. Also, Japan today has relinquished all their claims to Taiwan island, but the ROC and the PRC have not. You said: "China has associated with Russia and it is seen as being similar." China is friends to both Russia and Ukraine. China opposes conflict and is sending humanitarian aid to Ukraine, but China is also continuing business with Russia. On the other hand, it's the NATO countries that are sending lethal aid to Ukraine and prolonging the conflict. You said: "This means there is a lot of distrust towards the PRC in the world." Actually, studies shown that the countries opposing Russia account for only 36% of the world's population. Around two-thirds of people live in countries that either neutral or sympathetic to Russia. You said: "Without global trust, it will never be possible for China to become an important country in the world." China is already an important country in the world, regardless of whether you think you trust us or not. China is making the headlines in newspapers all over the world, how can you claim China will never become an important country?
    1
  17774. This video is being narrated by laowhy, who is imposing his own "American viewpoint". Most Chinese, such as his wife, appear to find nothing wrong with the show. The show is meant to promote better China-African ties, so aspects of Chinese and African culture are bound to be depicted.
    1
  17775. Omar Omokhodion The show is showcasing African culture, so of course African culture will be featured.
    1
  17776. Canada has anti-mask laws at rallies too.
    1
  17777.  gaurav bhagat bhagat  You Indians love Chinese products, take smartphones for example and here are the Top 10 Mobile Phone Companies in India in 2019. Top 10 Mobile Phone Companies in India in 2019 1. Samsung (South Korean) 2. Xiaomi (Chinese) 3. Lenovo (Chinese) 4. Vivo (Chinese) 5. Oppo (Chinese) 6. LG (South Korean) 7. Apple (American) 8. Nokia (Finnish) 9. OnePlus (Chinese) 10. HTC (Chinese) Source: Top 10 Mobile Phone Companies in India for 2019 nextwhatbusiness.com/top-mobile-phone-companies-india Are you using Chinese smartphone right now? Why you continue to look down on Chinese products then?
    1
  17778.  @HannarrMontannarr  In high end technology, China is home to world's largest high-speed rail network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen and Taiwan's hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, very smooth and efficient, so much that you can balance small objects like coins, stationery, smartphones and inverted water bottles near the windows of a train moving at 350 kph and the objects will remain undisturbed for long period. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE
    1
  17779.  @HannarrMontannarr  About the CCP supposedly "stifling" economic growth and entrepreneurship in China, China has produced many successful companies like Huawei, Lenovo, Xiaomi, Oppo, ZTE, Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, DJI, Haier, Bank of China, AgBank, ICBC, China Construction Bank, State Grid, CSCEC, Sinopec, China Minmetals, CNPC, Shenhua Energy, Ping An Insurance, Midea Group, Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, and this list is not exhaustive. Many of these companies are among the top in their respective industries and have appeared on business magazines. Sources: List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies _List of largest banks_.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks Fortune Global 500 wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_Global_500 Forbes Global 2000 wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Global_2000 In contrast, where are all the famous Taiwan companies? And why aren't they doing as well as China? Yet you still think Taiwan is superior to the PRC in possibly every metric?
    1
  17780.  @martinusv7433  Chinese Classical Music has a long history in China too. Ancient Music scores have existed since Warring States Period (400 BC) and are still being played using traditional Chinese musical instruments like the Guzheng 古箏 or Chinese Zither. Here is a traditional Chinese song entitled High Mountain Flowing Water 《高山流水》played on the Guzheng and this track was even featured in the Sid Meier’s Civilizations 6 video game. Video: Guzheng - High Mountain Flowing Water 高山流水 youtube.com/watch?v=ffCKlqWOewo Other Chinese instruments include the Bamboo Flute dízi 笛子 and hearing its notes being played is already reminiscence of Asian culture and its a common musical instrument in many Chinese musical pieces, both classical as well as some modern songs too. Video: Endless Love on Bamboo Flute youtube.com/watch?v=WwSoOVmO4gk&t=55 Video: Chinese Bamboo Flute - Sad Music Instrumental That Will Make You Cry | Ancient Sad And Romantic youtube.com/watch?v=qfh8oMivcIQ&t=27 Lastly, we have the Chinese instrument erhu 二胡 which has often been nicknamed Chinese Violin and produces a soulful, beautiful, almost human-like sound that has been likened to hearing a weeping lady. Many classical Chinese musical pieces have been played with this instrument, and the instrument is versatile enough to play both sad and mournful music, as well as energetic, cheerful music too. Video: Erhu - Ballad of North Henan Province 豫北叙事曲 youtube.com/watch?v=7fdFGEg-9R8&t=50
    1
  17781.  @martinusv7433  According to World Bank, China has lifted 700 million out of poverty in just 40 years. Just for comparison, the entire population of African continent is about 1.2 billion people. So China lifted a number equal to HALF of Africa's entire population out of poverty in decades as compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. So why do you claim CCP isn't responsible for this? The whole of the rest of the world has only lifted a mere 150 million out of poverty in comparison. Historical Achievement: Take 700 Million People out of Poverty youtube.com/watch?v=onLbp4WMoz4 What makes you think the Chinese economy and literacy rate was so screwed up because of Mao Zedong? Before Mao Zedong came to power in 1949, China was dirt-poor, war-torn, illiterate, starving country under the previous KMT administration of China (Republic of China 1912-1949). China was divided into various provinces ruled by various individual warlords, we lost control of Tibet in 1912 and even the Japanese attacked China twice during this chaotic period. You know why China's literacy grew so rapidly? Its because China at that time was suffering from large population, high birth rate, high child malnutrition and high mortality, and there weren't enough resources, enough schools and hospitals to provide adequate healthcare. Why allow families to raise multiple kids, only for them to starve to death, or succumb to diseases in childhood? Why not focus all your resources into raising a single, healthy kid past childhood and get him into a good school? That's why China's literacy rate grew so rapidly because of the One-Child Policy. So how is the CCP not responsible for China's rise in literacy?
    1
  17782. ​ @martinusv7433  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China's history is too expansive to be wiped out by any single man, party or revolution. The Mongol (and later the Manchu) conquerors of China tried to wipe our culture, but ended up assimilating into Chinese culture and language, so what makes you think China is destroyed in 20th century? About "in contemporary China" aren't Chinese culture, language and music still being preserved today as shown in my previous videos? Why are you ignoring the fact that Chinese culture is still being practiced in China today? China became crippled in 19th century because Britain wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything that the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China, and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to spread the addiction through rest of China and Hong Kong was taken from us and made into British colony. When Britain renounced its former colonies, Hong Kong was not even fully returned back to China. So how is the Chinese Communist Party to blame for what the British did to cripple China in the 19th century?
    1
  17783.  @HannarrMontannarr  About Intellectual Property, every country copies technology from one another. Where'd you think Taiwan got their high end technology then? Even the USA copied German technology and stole German patents after WWII. At the beginning of WWII, American tanks were largely inferior to German tanks, but after WWII Nazi Surrender, the Americans absorbed German Panzer (Tank) Technology and that's why American tanks are so powerful today. The Nazi Airforce (Luftwaffe) had such successful aircraft designs that America incorporated those designs into its Airforce. Even Nazi V2 Rocket Scientists were put to work by NASA on their Moon landing missions. Source: One of the greatest ripoffs of all time was the US theft of German patents after WWII wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/patents.html Like I said, the PRC was NOT a member of the UN during the time of the Korean War in 1950s, and PRC only became a member of UN in 1970s, so why did you wrote "Lets not forge that china attack UN forces in korea, an organisation that it was a member of,"? You already got your historical facts about Korean War all mixed up in your statement here. According to journalist Fyodor Tertitskiy, documentation from 1945 suggests the Soviet government had no plans for a permanent division of Korea, and a Soviet-US Joint Commission met in 1946 and 1947 to work towards a unified administration. In 1946, the Soviet Union proposed Lyuh Woon-hyung as the leader of a unified Korea, but this was rejected by the US. At the final meeting of the Joint Commission in September 1947, Soviet delegate Terentii Shtykov proposed that both Soviet and US troops withdraw and give the Korean people the opportunity to form their own government. This was again rejected by the US. Source: Why Soviet plans for Austria-style unification in Korea did not become a reality nknews.org/2018/08/why-russian-plans-for-austria-style-unification-in-korea-did-not-become-a-reality So isn't the USA that seemingly refused to allow Korea to unify by themselves? Isn't it the USA that rejected the idea that both Soviet and US forces withdraw and give the Korean people the opportunity to form their own government? You said "The sole responsibility of the partition is on the USSR. The border was then agreed upon internationally." The Korean partition along the 38th Parallel was drawn by on August 10, 1945 by two young American officers, Dean Rusk and Charles Bonesteel, working on extremely short notice and completely unprepared, so they used a National Geographic map to decide on the 38th parallel. No experts on Korea were consulted, so what gives the Americans the right to just unilaterally draw up lines to divide the country? The Americans didn't even consult Koreans and just drew up the lines based on two US officers suggestions? The Korean War was internal Civil War within Korea, so what give the USA the right to intervene in this internal civil war inside Korea? Korean war should be settled by Koreans themselves, yet the USA just invade Korea and pushed the North Koreans past the 38th Parallel and into North Korean territory? China only joined the Korean War because North Korea was our ally and PLA troops did not enter South Korean territory. Which battles were fought on South Korean territory by PLA troops you tell me? Also, why is it the combined might of 16 armies failed to defeat China and North Korea? The PLA were mostly poorly trained peasants, our weapons were crappy, our supply lines overextended, we lacked air support, and we only had North Korean troops for allies. You said earlier that "China outnumbered the combined UN forces by 50%." but that is only a mere 1 to 1.5 ratio so how is that a significant advantage?
    1
  17784.  @HannarrMontannarr Something is rather fishy in the rankings. in 2017, China was ranked 77 and India ranked 81, and suddenly in 2018, India is ranked 78 and China is 87? Also, President Xi's anti-corruption campaign began since 2012, so its not just in 2017-2018 alone that China began this anti-corruption campaign. And what anti-corruption campaign did India actually do to suddenly lower its corruption index? About China overtaking the USA, the Chinese government has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's direction and future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc, and to set specific goals for China to achieve. Some of these goals include (but are not limited to): -By 2020, China plans to eliminate poverty completely and establish moderately prosperous society. -By 2025, China plans to transform our manufacturing industry to incorporate high-end technology. -By 2030, China plans to be world leader in Artificial Intelligence -By 2035, China plans to be key innovative, scientific power and establish moderately socialist society. -By 2040, China plans to ban all fossil fuel powerplants and all non-electric vehicles for greener future. -By 2045, China plans to be world leading space nation, having established a space elevator. -By 2050, China plans to have surpassed the USA as global superpower, economically and militarily. Xi outlines his vision to achieve ‘China Dream’ by 2050 http://www.atimes.com/article/xi-outlines-vision-achieve-china-dream-2050/ By abolishing the presidential term limit, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come into fruition in the future. Whereas in USA, their leaders have to eventually step down after their term limits ends after 4-8 years, and therefore US leaders can only make short plans for USA, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more for USA. How exactly has the CCP been a disaster for China? You think ROC wasn't tyrannical as well? Before the CCP came to power, Dr. Sun Yatsen overthrew the Qing Dynasty and established Republic of China (1912-1949) and during this chaotic period, China was divided into several provinces ruled by individual warlords. Tibet broke free of ROC and even the Japanese invaded China twice during this weak period in China's history. There were numerous famines as well, such as the 1920-1921 famine, 1928–1930 famine, 1936-1937 famine, 1942–1943 famine. But under Mao Zedong, China was finally unified (which the previous KMT administration of China failed to achieve even after 37 years!) under communism in 1949, and Tibet was finally returned to China in 1951, so how is CCP a disaster for China then? If not for Mao Zedong, China today would most likely still be divided and fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong, unified country we are today. I mean, what's your beef with the CCP? You claimed so many people were killed and starved by the CCP? Then why is China the world's most populous country today if our population supposedly suffered so much? The government even needed to introduced One-Child Policy to limit our population growth. The CCP has done a marvelous job transforming China from a dirt-poor, war-torn, illiterate, starving country, into an economic juggernaut today, the world's factory, the largest land army, as well as a major political player in the world today. I mean, what makes you think ROC would have done a better job than PRC, given that ROC failed to develop China significantly even after ruling the mainland for 37 years? Where's your proof of an alternate history of China achieving our success without the CCP you tell me?
    1
  17785.  @MarkYeung1  Your first words were (and I quote): "but you can't discriminate against one foreign ownership and allow another." Then in one of your later comments, you wrote: "Our government doesn't want foreign buyers to buy houses excessively and drive up prices so that people cannot afford housing." so isn't that discrimination?
    1
  17786.  @MarkYeung1  US Fixed Housing Affordability Index is at a current level of 87 (average household has to work 87 years with no other expenses to purchase an average home) yet you're claiming mainland China's housing is 3 times worse than USA? The US housing market is so unaffordable that over 75% of homes on the market are too expensive for middle class buyers, according to a report from the National Association of Realtors and Realtor.
    1
  17787.  @MarkYeung1  We were talking about Housing Affordability Index, where did this price to income ratio come from? You clearly said mainland China has an extremely housing affordability index at 9.0 which is 3 times worse than USA. But the Fixed Housing Affordability Index in USA is is at a current level of 87, so how is China's 3 times worst? You can't answer this question so you suddenly bring in price to income ratio? Canada's home ownership rate is 66%. USA's home ownership rate is 65%. Yet China's home ownership rate is 90%. So a greater percentage of Chinese own homes than Americans or Canadians according to those statistics.
    1
  17788. ​ @MarkYeung1 "In China, foreign housing ownership is not allowed, whether you are from USA or Russia." Says who? Foreigners can buy apartments in China by meeting the necessary requirements and following the process. This includes having one year of residence, owning only one property for personal use, and obtaining government approval. Where do you even get your information from? Yet you constantly accuse me of only obtaining information from Chinese media?
    1
  17789.  @happyzahn8031  The point was that the OP claimed that mainland China has an extremely housing affordability index at 9.0 which is 3 times worse than USA. Yet if you look up USA's housing affordability index, it is at a current level of 87, so how is China's 3 times worse?
    1
  17790.  @happyzahn8031  China's 83% home ownership is still higher than America's 50% home ownership rate. Also, in China the apartments are leased to people for 70 years, but once the lease expires after 70 years, all you need to do is renew the lease. This ensures that property in China always gets updated after 70 years, instead of the land becoming fallow and the property falling into disrepair after 70 years.
    1
  17791.  @MarkYeung1  "Chinese homes are MUCH More expensive than US or Canadian homes." Yet China has higher home ownership rate at 90% compared to 66% for Canada and 65% for the United States. "Chinese people are FORCED TO BUY the houses due to systemic incapability to invest the savings elsewhere" No one's forcing Chinese to buy the houses if they don't want to, its just that traditionally, Chinese investors have preferred real estate to the volatile domestic stock market that is driven more by retail sentiment than long-term institutional holders.
    1
  17792. jeffrman777 Chinese call such SJWs as baizuo 白左 which literally means "White Left" named after the liberal leftists.
    1
  17793. Its true though. Their earlier videos showcased both the good and bad things about China in a balanced way. But over the years, something changed in them, and the latest videos have started to become more negative. They give off the impression that they don't regard China as their home, nor do they consider Chinese people their fellow countrymen. It's like, they talk about China like its a strange foreign place, filled with people different from themselves, despite living in China for over 10 years and having taken Chinese wives as well.
    1
  17794. Many Chinese hold optimistic attitudes and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands with suspicion.
    1
  17795. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17796. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China..
    1
  17797. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17798. According to its constitution, Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17799. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17800. According to its constitution, Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17801. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms and would probably have done a 5th, yet Chinese President Xi Jinping is only entering his 3rd term.
    1
  17802. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms whereas Chinese President Xi Jinping is only entering his 3rd term.
    1
  17803.  @hermittmog8697  Canada missed out on the perfect opportunity to exert economic leverage, since China lifted the meat ban on our own. Now that the ban is lifted, it's going to be difficult for Canada to convince its meat sellers not to sell to China.
    1
  17804.  @hermittmog8697  Meng Wanzhou been arrested 1 year ago since 2018, but why hasn't her trial been put through? And her hearing is scheduled for January 2020 next year? Why need to wait so long just for that? Is it because there's no evidence of her crimes, so the USA needs time to manufacture evidence against Meng? Is USA doing this to strike an economic blow against Huawei, because Huawei is doing so well?
    1
  17805. @Matthew Li So what's this "leverage" that Canadian sellers have over Chinese buyers? Canada missed out on the opportunity to exert economic leverage to get something out of China, because China lifted the ban off our own. If Canada decided to halt the sales of meat to China, Canadian meat sellers probably won't be to happy to comply. And its not the US pork sellers that are complaining, its the American soybean farmers that are hurting.
    1
  17806. Bhutan is hardly the country to lead the rise of Asia. Everybody knows it's China that's behind the rise of Asia, yet Bhutan maintains no official relations with China, and hardly trades with China. Land-connectivity will be enhanced by China's Belt and Road Initiative, yet Bhutan is not a part of BRI. How then can Bhutan lead the rise of Asia if it refuses to ride the waves generated by China?
    1
  17807. +kam kiyum Uighurs were originally not Muslim and they have a culture of their own, before Islam came and made their women wear headveil. Just search for pictures of "Uighur Girl" and look at how beautiful they look in their traditional clothes. Why do you want to cover up their faces with Muslim headveil? Because Islam?
    1
  17808. +kam kiyum Religions were the cause of numerous religious wars such as the Crusades, Holy wars, Jihad, etc. China is also home to religions like Taoism, Buddhism, Confucianism (not real religion, but more a set of principles) and of course, Christianity and Islam. But there have been no major religious wars in China, because the government has been largely atheists and does not put any one religion above the others. About girls in bikini, and dictating what they wear, China does not go to Muslim countries and tell the women to throw off their headveils. If you live in Muslim country like Saudi Arabia, then you should adhere to Saudi Arabian laws. Likewise if you live in China, you should obey Chinese laws, and headveils are discouraged in China. You are free to wear whatever you want outside of China, but in China you are expected to follow our laws. Its our country and thus our laws after all.
    1
  17809. The measures taken by Wuhan's reopening is a glimpse at how other countries can go about reopening their economies after lockdown. No other country has reopened their economy after lockdown and China is paving the way forward in this area.
    1
  17810.  @Shadowless_Kick  "Hu is physically weak, but mentally strong enough to judge right and wrong." Are you his doctor or something? You said: "Majority of overseas Chinese, include many pro-government, pro-CCP folks, think it is so obvious that Hu was forced to leave to prevent him from showing objection to the result of the election" Do you have evidence that majority of overseas Chinese think this way? Even if we somehow give you the benefit of the doubt, the results of the election have to be respected by even Hu.
    1
  17811. The USA approved 60 billion of military aid to arguably the most corrupt country in Europe, Ukraine.
    1
  17812. @Christopher Jacobs You said: "The US is not perfect but to claim living in China is better is crazy." China has literally overtaken the U.S in life expectancy at birth for the first time, according to WHO data. Chinese newborns can look forward to 68.7 years of healthy life ahead of them, compared with 68.5 years for American babies. So why is it crazy to claim that living in China is better than the U.S given that you are expected to live longer here?
    1
  17813.  @bostonbruinsfanboy  It was the Communist Party of China that attracted Western investment, by actively making the conditions in China suitable for foreign investors. Also, it was CPC policy that any foreign companies setting up shop in China have to agree to transfer technology (or partner up with a Chinese company) that allowed China to develop into what it is today. Yet why is it you decide to discredit the CPC for their contributions to China? Western investors wouldn't have bothered with sharing technology if it weren't for CPC policy.
    1
  17814.  @jasonleetaiwan  You said: "In the first few decades after WW2, Japan and Germany were both open and had two of the best economies in the world." That's because both Germany and Japan were previously authoritarian as Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan during WWII. The Nazis transformed post Weimar government Germany into a force that's capable of taking on the Allied countries initially. The same goes for Imperial Japan, they first modernised during the Meiji Restoration (under Emperor Meiji) who abolished the Shogunate system and restored power to the Japanese throne. That's why Imperial Japan was arguably Asia's strongest nation at the start of WWII. So you can't really credit having an open system as the reason why countries develop and industrialise and this applies to Taiwan Island, Germany, and Japan.
    1
  17815.  @jasonleetaiwan  Did the PRC benefit from Mao economically? Not really." Chairman Mao is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  17816.  @jbently5303  The U.S have their own molds that's difficult to break free off. For example, if you say anything politically incorrect regarding LGBT, feminism, ethnic minorities, etc then the social justice warriors (SJWs) might come after you.
    1
  17817.  @bostonbruinsfanboy  So I take it you're unable to refute my points, so you resort to hiding behind Jason and making crass remarks against me? It's apparent that the CPC attracted Western investors to China and forced the sharing of technology (or partnering with local Chinese company) if Western companies want to set up shop here, so shouldn't credit for China's success go toward the Communist Party of China? Because it is government policy after all.
    1
  17818.  @bostonbruinsfanboy  So I take it you're unable to refute my points, so you resort to hiding behind Jason and making crass remarks against me? It's apparent that Western companies wouldn't have bothered to "share technology" with China, it was CPC policy that facilitated the transfer of technology.
    1
  17819.  @jasonleetaiwan  You said: "He also divided and weakened China before WW2" The Communist Party stood at only 50 members in 1921, how could Mao have divided and weakened China? I've previously shown that China was divided into several provinces ruled by individual warlords after Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the Qing Dynasty. The KMT ruled the Republic of China (1912-1949) for 37 years but failed to reunify it, until Mao came along and reunified our country, proclaiming the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949. That's why he's known as the founding father of PRC, because if not for Mao, China would most likely still be a weak and divided country, instead of the strong, unified country we are today.
    1
  17820. @Christopher Jacobs Hong Kong was taken from China by the British. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  17821.  @jasonleetaiwan  "神州 Shenzhou Having an army of 1.2 million troops is not a small number of troops in 1945." But 1945 is AFTER WW2. Earlier you clearly wrote: "He also divided and weakened China before WW2" but the communists only had a strength of 50 members in 1921, so how can you claim he divided and weakened China before WW2? Furthermore, although communists had a strength of 1.2 million (July 1945), the Nationalist KMT had a strength of 2 million (June 1946), so clearly the KMT outnumbered the communists. Yet despite their numerical advantage, the KMT still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants, and had to flee to Taiwan? And mind you, this was after the Japanese surrendered, so there was no more fighting the Japanese after 1945.
    1
  17822.  @jasonleetaiwan  "but Mao could have united the nation with Chiang without a shot fired by either side." But It was Chiang kai-shek that fired the first shot, starting the whole Chinese Civil War through purging some 5,000–10,000 communist members in what's known as the 1927 Shanghai Massacre. The KMT tried several times to wipe out the communists, and it's through sheer determination and Mao Zedong's strategy of the Long March (长征) that the communists survived by a slim margin. So even if you claim Mao could have united the nation with Chiang, it's apparent that Chiang will not tolerate the communists being in power. You said: "If Mao accepted, China would have been united with a system for eventual liberal democracy." But why does China have to have Liberal Democracy in the first place? China tried Western Style democracy for 37 years, during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period, but China wasn't even unified during this period. It was Mao Zedong and the communists that succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country and proclaimed the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949. Even Tibet (which the KMT failed to incorporate back into China) was finally reunified with the mainland in 1951. Since China's political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot), then is there really a need for China to abandon our current system and adopt Western-style democracy?
    1
  17823.  @jasonleetaiwan  You said: "They don't have a respectable place in history because you seem to think that winning a civil war makes you a good person in history, but it doesn't." The reason why the CPC doesn't have a "respectable place" in history, is only because Western anti-communist propaganda seeks to denounce our ideology. Over 50 years ago, nobody expected "communist China" to succeed, yet fast forward till today and look at how far China has come. China has since transformed from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending protected by the world's largest land army, the PLA, having the world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, how is that not a respectable history in itself?
    1
  17824.  @jasonleetaiwan  "神州 Shenzhou Yes, he divided and weakened China before and after WW2." Read my post on how the Chinese Civil War started. It started because Chiang kai-shek decided to purge thousands of communists during the 1927 Shanghai Massacre, so it wasn't Mao that divided and weakened China, it was Chiang's idea all along. You can't even seem to point out how Mao is responsible for dividing and weakening the country, when it's apparent that if not for Mao Zedong reunifying our divided country under the banner of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949, that China would still be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves as we were during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. And once again, China tried "liberal democracy" during that period and it didn't work out, so why do you insist China should become liberal democratic?
    1
  17825.  @jasonleetaiwan  "Also, when the PLA gained the upper hand, they were well equipped by the Russians" While it's true that the communists were supplied by the Soviet Union, at the same time, the United States was pouring U.S military aid to the KMT. But corruption was rampant within KMT ranks and it got so bad that even U.S President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", having pocketed some $750,000,000 in US aid. So it's apparent that the KMT had all the wealth, were equipped with U.S weapons and had a numerical superiority over the communists, yet the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, starving communists peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? You said: "and had former KMT troops that switched sides so the remaining KMT troops lost mostly to former KMT troops under CCP command." So this begs the question: "Why'd the KMT troops deserted their ranks and switch sides to the Communist Party?" Was it because the KMT leadership weas corrupt, decadent and incompetent, so much such that the KMT troops decided to join the communists against their former brethren?
    1
  17826.  @jasonleetaiwan  "Also, when the PLA gained the upper hand, they were well equipped by the Russians" While it's true that the communists were supplied by the Soviet Union, at the same time, the United States was pouring U.S military aid to the KMT. But corruption was rampant within KMT ranks and it got so bad that even U.S President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", having pocketed some $750,000,000 in US aid. So it's apparent that the KMT had all the wealth, were equipped with U.S weapons and had a numerical superiority over the communists, yet the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, starving communists peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? You said: "and had former KMT troops that switched sides so the remaining KMT troops lost mostly to former KMT troops under CCP command." So this begs the question: "Why'd the KMT troops deserted their ranks and switch sides to the Communist Party?"
    1
  17827.  @jasonleetaiwan  "Also, when the PLA gained the upper hand, they were well equipped by the Russians" While it's true that the communists were supplied by the Soviet Union, at the same time, the United States was pouring U.S military aid to the KMT. But corruption was rampant within KMT ranks and it got so bad that even U.S President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", having pocketed some $750,000,000 in US aid. You said: "and had former KMT troops that switched sides so the remaining KMT troops lost mostly to former KMT troops under CCP command." So this begs the question: "Why'd the KMT troops deserted their ranks and switch sides to the Communist Party?"
    1
  17828.  @jasonleetaiwan  "Also, when the PLA gained the upper hand, they were well equipped by the Russians" While it's true that the communists were supplied by the Soviet Union, at the same time, the United States was pouring U.S military aid to the KMT. But corruption was rampant within KMT ranks and it got so bad that even U.S President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", having pocketed some $750,000,000 in US aid.
    1
  17829.  @jasonleetaiwan  "神州 Shenzhou I was referring to late 1945 but you keep changing time periods to suit your arguments." Look, this is what you wrote earlier, you said: "He also divided and weakened China before WW2" and in your next post, you wrote: "神州 Shenzhou Having an army of 1.2 million troops is not a small number of troops in 1945." but that is AFTER WW2, so how am I changing the time period? Furthermore, you later said: "神州 Shenzhou Yes, he divided and weakened China before and after WW2." yet when I quoted time periods BEFORE and AFTER WW2, you accuse me of changing the time period?
    1
  17830.  @jasonleetaiwan  You said the communists were supplied by the Soviet Union, but similarly, the KMT was supplied by the United States. But the KMT were corrupt and pocketed around $750,000,000 dollars worth of U.S aid, so much until U.S President Truman made a remark about it and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", You said: "and had former KMT troops that switched sides so the remaining KMT troops lost mostly to former KMT troops under CCP command." So this begs the question: "Why'd the KMT troops switched sides to the Communist Party?"
    1
  17831.  @jasonleetaiwan  You said the communists were supplied by the Soviet Union, but similarly, the KMT was supplied by the United States. But the KMT were corrupt and pocketed around $750,000,000 dollars worth of U.S aid, so much until U.S President Truman made a remark about it and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves".
    1
  17832.  @jasonleetaiwan  The KMT was supplied by the United States, but corruption was rampant and the KMT had pocketed around $750,000,000 dollars worth of U.S aid. So much until U.S President Truman made a remark about it and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves". You said: "and had former KMT troops that switched sides so the remaining KMT troops lost mostly to former KMT troops under CCP command." So this begs the question: "Why'd the KMT troops switched sides to the Communist Party?"
    1
  17833.  @jasonleetaiwan  You said the Russians supplied the communists, but the United States supplied the KMT. In fact, the U.S sent some $750,000,000 worth of U.S aid to KMT, but they just pocketed the money, until even U.S President Truman made a remark about it and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves".
    1
  17834.  @jasonleetaiwan  You said: "and had former KMT troops that switched sides so the remaining KMT troops lost mostly to former KMT troops under CCP command." So this begs the question: "Why'd the KMT troops switched sides and joined the communists?" You said: "Regardless of the result and numbers, it was the CCP that divided China's armed forces for personal gain from the start." Again, how did the CPC divided China's armed forces from the start, when it was Chiang kai-shek that initiated a purge of thousands of communists during the 1927 Shanghai Massacre? And you said the CPC did so for personal gain? Then how do you explain the KMT pocketing some $750 million in U.S aid given to them by U.S President Truman?
    1
  17835.  @jasonleetaiwan  You said: "but rather it was Mao that refused to unite China voluntarily after WW2 to join a democratic Republic which China still isn't today. " You keep on repeating this point, but where's your proof? I've pointed out that Chiang started the whole Chinese Civil War with his purging of communist members, yet you've been blaming Mao all this time for something that Chiang started? Even when the Imperial Japanese invaded Manchuria in 1931, Chiang refused to meet the invaders, instead he continued his purging of communists (our own fellow Chinese), until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng had to kidnap Chiang to force him to change his policy. This incident is known as the Xi'An Incident. Source: Wikipedia: Xi'an Incident Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was actually thanks to communist goodwill by communist diplomats Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release. Only then, was Chiang willing to ally with the communists against the Japanese invaders. You said: "His place in history will be viewed as negative as soon as the PRC does not exist one day." Once again, Chairman Mao is the founding father of the People's Republic of China, and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist KMT administration failed for 37 years. I mean, literally nobody expected the communists to succeed, against a bigger enemy like the KMT, yet it's clearly the communists that are in control of China today, while the KMT lost the mainland and had to flee to Taiwan. If not for Mao, China would most likely still be the weak and divided country during the Republic of China period, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  17836.  @jasonleetaiwan  Look, earlier you wrote (and I quote your own words): "He also divided and weakened China before WW2." and later you've also wrote: "神州 Shenzhou Yes, he divided and weakened China before and after WW2." so we are talking about the time period before and after WWII. Yet why'd you keep on accusing me of changing time periods? Also, you keep repeating "Mao divided China, Mao divided China, etc" but you have nothing to show for it. Whereas I've shown how the whole Chinese Civil War began with Chiang kai-shek's Shanghai Massacre. If anyone's "dividing China," it's clearly Chiang when he began purging communists in 1927. I've also explained how when the Imperial Japanese invaded Manchuria in 1931, Chiang refused to meet the invaders head on, instead he continued purging communists, and was eventually kidnapped by two of his Generals (in what's known as the Xi'an Incident (西安事变) and it was actually thanks to communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release, that the KMT and communists finally formed a united front against the Japanese invaders. If anything, it was practically the communists who unified China. Source: Wikipedia: Xi'an Incident But you keep on repeating that Mao divided and weakened China when it's actually the opposite. Chairman Mao succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided homeland and proclaimed the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949. If not for Mao, it's possible China would still be a weak and divided country as we were during the KMT adminstration of the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949)
    1
  17837.  @jasonleetaiwan  You said: "Also, the CCP was planning to overthrow the KMT government by force," But the communists only had a strength of just 50 members in 1921, and the right-wing KMT still vastly outnumbered the communists so how were the CPC planning to overthrow the KMT by force? And mind you, the KMT justify their own rule over China by overthrowing the previous Qing Dynasty government, isn't it? You said: "so the Shanghai Massacre was prompted by that so Chiang was just responding to a physical threat to his government." Why the double standards here? It was clearly Chiang that divided China, when he started purging communists during the Shanghai Massacre, which started the whole Chinese Civil War, not Mao. Yet you just dismiss the purging of 5,000 - 10,000 communists as "just responding to a physical threat," without recognizing it as the reason why China is divided. Also, given the events of 1927, you think Mao Zedong will be foolish enough to trust Chiang, when he was the one purging communists? Also, you earlier mentioned KMT troops switching sides and joining the communists, then have you asked yourself "Why did those KMT troops switched sides?" If anything, it just shows that the communists were willing to accept KMT members, but Chiang kai-shek only wanted to purge communists. So who is really dividing China here? You said: "Are you being deliberately naive or do you not understand the history?" I have wrote paragraphs of my understanding of the events of the Chinese Civil War, citing various events and statistics and so on to support my argument. Whereas you just repeatedly blame Mao Zedong as "dividing and weakening China before and after WWII" without anything to support your argument. How did Mao divide and weaken China before and after WWII? If anything, Chairman Mao is the founding father of the People's Republic of China after successfully reunifying China after WWII.
    1
  17838. @comment sense "NO need to go to China to find out. " So without ever setting foot in China and seeing what life is like for yourself, you already harbor a negative opinion of our country? Then you are basically anti-China that's all, if that's your stance.
    1
  17839. @comment sense You would expect that a religious book like the Holy Bible would denounce any who don't believe in their God, but what has some mysterious entity whose existence is unproven ever done for the people of China, that we should believe in it?
    1
  17840. @comment sense Since you're sharing your psalms with me, there's this Chinese saying: "There are no heroes descending from the heavens, only ordinary mortals who step forth." (没有从天而降的英雄，只有挺身而出的凡人。) It means that we shouldn't rely on help from up above, instead the true heroes are ordinary people who rolled up their sleeves and enact change.
    1
  17841. @comment sense "没有从天而降的英雄，只有挺身而出的凡人。" "There are no heroes descending from the heavens, only ordinary mortals who step up to the challenge."
    1
  17842. @comment sense Corruption is a universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are anti-corruption crackdown to deal with corruption within the communist party. More than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption and the campaign netted over 120 high-ranking officials, including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders. And it is people that crackdown on corruption, not some mysterious entity up above. When is the last time a country like the United States had an anti-corruption crackdown of its own?
    1
  17843. @comment sense Corruption is a universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are anti-corruption crackdown to deal with corruption within the communist party. More than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption and the campaign netted over 120 high-ranking officials, including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders. But when is the last time a country like the United States had an anti-corruption crackdown of their own?
    1
  17844. @comment sense Under President Xi Jinping, there are anti-corruption crackdown to deal with corruption within the communist party. More than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption and the campaign netted over 120 high-ranking officials, including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders. But when is the last time a country like the United States had an anti-corruption crackdown of its own?
    1
  17845. @comment sense President Xi Jinping is actually taking measures to crackdown on corruption within the Communist Party and more than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption. It's up to humans to deal with corruption, and not put all our faith on some mysterious entity up above who's existence is as of yet, unproven scientifically.
    1
  17846. @comment sense President Xi Jinping is actually taking measures to crackdown on corruption within the Communist Party and more than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption.
    1
  17847. @comment sense Corruption is man-made, and it's up to people ourselves to deal with corruption. President Xi's anti-corruption crackdown has resulted in more than 100,000 people being indicted for corruption.
    1
  17848. @comment sense China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it seems like the U.S is a threat to global peace and stability.
    1
  17849. @comment sense What makes you think everyone automatically behave themselves? If the U.S behaved itself, it wouldn't have gotten involved in those wars in Asia and the Middle East, isn't it?
    1
  17850. @comment sense Even religious members of the Church aren't immune to corruption, the Church has been rocked by a series of sex scandals for crying out loud
    1
  17851. @comment sense China doesn't want war, but that doesn't mean China is weak. China is not afraid of war, and we will defend our sovereign territory from invaders seeking to carve up China's territory like a pie (as in that infamous French cartoon).
    1
  17852. @comment sense Lobsters ARE animals, what makes you think they aren't?
    1
  17853. @comment sense The one who is weak and insecure here is the one resorting to using capital letters in an attempt to hide their weakness here.
    1
  17854. @comment sense Strength is not a matter of making war, and neither is kindness for that matter. China's strength lies in developing infrastructure in other countries and not making war upon then, the one who lacks strength is the one constantly trying to provoke mainland China by sending representatives to Taiwan island.
    1
  17855. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou NO ONE IS PERFECT. EVERYTHING IS RELATIVE." Then why are you seemingly against the people of China and our government? You're the one hurling insults my way, while seemingly ignoring the sex scandals by members of the Christian church, then what's your point?
    1
  17856. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou WHO SAYS WARS ARE EVER WRONG?" Sun Zi's The Art of War 《孙子兵法》 believes that “The greatest victory is that which requires no battle.”
    1
  17857. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou USING CAPITAL LETTERS = HIDING WEAKNESS?" Because it shows that you are insecure of the strength of your own words, that you would resort to using capital letters in order to appear more dominating. But all it does is reveal your own inner insecurity about yourself.
    1
  17858. @comment sense "WHEN YOU TREAT ANIMALS LIKE LOBSTERS," Lobsters ARE animals, when were they ever not?
    1
  17859. @comment sense You said: "The fool say in his heart, 'There is no God.' They are corrupt; their acts are vile. There is no one who does good."" Tell that line to the victims that were sexually abused by members of the Church.
    1
  17860. @comment sense "The fool say in his heart, 'There is no God.' They are corrupt; their acts are vile. There is no one who does good."" Tell that line to the indigenous people in Canada who suffered under the Church and were buried in unmarked graves.
    1
  17861. @comment sense You said: "For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities," You're welcome to go and overthrow your own country's government if you like, but why are you telling me this? A study by Harvard University and Ash Center have revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese polled support the Chinese government. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    1
  17862. @comment sense "神州 Shenzhou THEN WHY DO YOU HAVE A MILITARY?" To protect China of course.
    1
  17863. @comment sense To protect China of course. Which country in the world doesn't have a military?
    1
  17864. @comment sense So if your god's followers are NOT perfect and never will be perfect, then is there a point for people to continue with your beliefs? Why are you so intolerant of other people's views?
    1
  17865. @comment sense Why should China follow the path that you set out for us? Who do you think you are?
    1
  17866. @comment sense So if I don't read the Bible, then I won't face so-called Judgement? Then why should people continue believing in your religion?
    1
  17867. @comment sense What makes you say that? Have you faced judgement before?
    1
  17868. @comment sense Have you faced judgement before? Then how can you claim no one can escape it?
    1
  17869. @comment sense How would you know whether some unproven entity actually controls all of us? Have you actually met the one of which you speak?
    1
  17870. @comment sense Why didn't he punish those members of the Church who were involved in sex scandals?
    1
  17871. @comment sense So you claim I can do whatever I want, then why are you trying to impose your will onto me and tell me what to do?
    1
  17872. @comment sense Why didn't he punish those members of the Church who were involved in sex scandals?
    1
  17873. @comment sense So in the meantime, those church members will be free to commit more crimes?
    1
  17874. @comment sense So those people can continue living to go on committing more crimes?
    1
  17875. @comment sense So he's just treating humans like agricultural produce and "harvesting" our souls when the time is right? Why do our souls belong to him?
    1
  17876. @comment sense Again, why should us humans "cultivate" our souls just for him to harvest it? And who's to say which souls are good to be harvested and which are bad to be burnt? If anything it sounds like exploitation is what it is.
    1
  17877. @comment sense How would you know that he created us? And even if he somehow did, it doesn't mean that we are somehow beholden to "cultivate" our souls to suit his desires, who is he to decide which crops are good to be harvested and which bad crops are to be burnt? If anything it sounds like a dictatorship of sorts.
    1
  17878.  @zhanganxin  Tik Tok is owned by Chinese company Bytedance. So those Tik Tok users are bashing China while using a media platform created in China and owned by Chinese company.
    1
  17879. @Shivam B Why did USA banned Huawei 5G network? Because Huawei's 5G is the most expansive network in the world?
    1
  17880.  @userman44  You said: "No, Communism put Chinese people in poverty." Previously under capitalist Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949), China was dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but after the Communist revolution, under the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 (1949~) China has transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  17881. @Shivam B Who said that YouTube is banned in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    1
  17882. @Shivam B "神州 Shenzhou yes I have heard of persons being arrested for no reasons" What are the names of people arrested just for login into YouTube while in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    1
  17883. @Shivam B The US Army lost the Vietnam War to starving Vietnamese communist peasants and USA did not win the Korean War. Even against the Middle East, the US Army been fighting a bunch of insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan for 15 years with no victory. Even the American soldier's child back home can easily grow up in 15 years, and still the parent did not win the war against some insurgents in the Middle East.
    1
  17884. @Shivam B  @Shivam B  Huawei has overtaken Apple as world's 2nd most popular smartphone brand according to article entitled Reuters: Huawei overtakes Apple as world No. 2 smartphone seller, gains ground in China
    1
  17885. @Shivam B "神州 Shenzhou US army if wanted at that time could have easily nuked your overlord" Then why didn't the USA done so? It shows US Army is incompetent without nuclear weapons, that's the US Army own choice not to deploy their full arsenal, then then lost the Vietnam War against starving communist Vietnamese peasants. During the Vietnam War, Americans dropped napalm bombs (remember 'Napalm Girl' photo? Who had her clothes burnt off and was running naked in the streets?) and torched Vietnamese villages to the ground. The Americans sprayed chemical defoliants like Agent Orange which cause birth deformities in Vietnamese children even 40 years after, and the American soldiers had sex with Vietnamese women and impregnated them, and then pulled out of South Vietnam and abandoned them to their fate.
    1
  17886. @Shivam B The then US President Bush accused Iraq of harbouring Weapons of Mass Destruction, but after the Iraq War, no evidence of WMDs were found so what was the Iraq War for? According to Iraq Body Count ( iraqbodycount.org ) there were some estimated 200,000 Iraqi civilians killed because of the Iraq War.
    1
  17887.  @1patbat  A long term Harvard University study has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. Source: Harvard survey finds Chinese satisfaction with govt rises http://www.china.org.cn/china/2020-07/17/content_76281590.htm
    1
  17888.  @MontanaCamp  "You just said you support communism ? Eat lead" About Capitalism vs Communism, it's no secret that Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can theoretically produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, for everyone on the planet. Yet we still have starvation, homelessness, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, because under capitalism, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." The Earth's resources are finite and while capitalism seeks to exhaust them, communism is dedicated to allocating resources according to needs.
    1
  17889. @Robert Wakeham "神州 Shenzhou still penicillin was the greatest invention and china didnt invent that …" Vaccines were literally invented in China. The earliest hints of the practice of variolation for smallpox in China come during the 10th century. Chinese also practiced the oldest documented use of variolation, dating back to the fifteenth century. Two reports on the Chinese practice of inoculation were received by the Royal Society in London in 1700; one by Martin Lister who received a report by an employee of the East India Company stationed in China and another by Clopton Havers. Source: Vaccine wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine#History
    1
  17890. @Robert Wakeham China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. China produces the most electricity from hydroelectric power, some 856.4 billion kilowatt hours a year – more than double the amount produced by Brazil, in second place. The top three is completed by Canada, which produces 376.7 billion kilowatt hours a year. Countries by hydroelectricity production (2012) 1. China (856 billion kwh) 2. Brazil (411 billion kwh) 3. Canada (376 billion kwh) 4. USA (276 billion kwh) 5. Russia (164 billion kwh) 6. Norway (140 billion kwh) 7. India (124 billion kwh) 8. Venezuela (81 billion kwh) 9. Sweden (78 billion kwh) 10. Japan (71 billion kwh) …… Source: Which countries produce the most hydroelectric power https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/
    1
  17891. @Robert Wakeham About China "cutting down siberia", China has massive reforestation initiatives to help green the Earth. The world's largest artificial forest is Saihanba National Forest Park (塞罕坝国家森林公园) located in China. Video: Saihanba, the world's largest man-made forest youtu.be/o5xdIVvFEeo Video: Two generations spent 55 years building world's largest man-made forest in Saihanba, N. China youtu.be/3RqsUD6fyGk
    1
  17892. @Robert Wakeham About greening the planet, the Maowusu Desert (毛乌素沙漠) is China's 5th largest desert, the size of Massachusetts and Connecticut combined, is now 80% afforested. Video: China's green growth miracle youtu.be/rDrbnsbVxlI Previously the forest coverage in Ejin Horo Banner was less than 3%. All these years of efforts, the forest coverage increased to above 90%
    1
  17893. @Robert Wakeham Chinese workers work tirelessly in Ningxia desert to stop desert encroachment through "straw checkerboards" in order to keep sand dunes from gaining ground. Stalks of dried grass are shoved into sand with a shovel in a checkerboard grid fashion. It's a simple method, but has shown to be effective in combating desertification. Video: China's wisdom in taming the desert youtu.be/YWIuqoi35Uw
    1
  17894. @Robert Wakeham Chinese scientists have found a method to convert sand to soil, using a blend of sand, water and a special kind of paste made from plant cellulose. Chinese researchers developed a paste made of plant cellulose, which helps retain water, nutrients and air. It's non-toxic, echo-friendly and affordable. Video: Chinese scientists find way to convert sand to soil youtu.be/idjegdl0L3Y After being treated with the technology, a 1.6+hectare sandy plot has been transformed into fertile land. The plants demand the same amount of water as those grown in regular soil, but require less fertilizer and bear higher yields.
    1
  17895. @Robert Wakeham China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  17896. @Robert Wakeham Westerners caused the extinction of the Dodo, Tasmanian Tiger and numerous other creatures, yet you want to complain about Chinese?
    1
  17897. @Robert Wakeham Video: Amazing China: Preservation Programs Save China's Endangered Species from Extinction youtu.be/ud_jKdI68eI
    1
  17898. @Robert Wakeham In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    1
  17899. @Robert Wakeham In 2016, China launched world's 1st quantum satellite, named Micius, (墨子) into orbit and demonstrated that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere, smashing the previous record held on Earth. Video: China's Quantum satellite achieves 'spooky action' at record distance youtube.com/watch?v=4QlcKuxDGrs Quantum entanglement (in a nutshell) is when two subatomic particles become an "entangled pair", able to influence their quantum states (won't go into detail here) seemingly regardless of the distance involved. One particle could be on the surface of the Earth, and the other on the surface of the Moon, and theoretically, they can still influence each other with no information (known to current science) passing in between them. The longest record for quantum entanglement on Earth is 143 km in at experiment in the Canary Islands. But China has allowed two stations (Delingha and Lijiang station) located 1200 km apart to communicate directly, through our quantum satellite, thus breaking the previous record and showcasing that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere. And as far as I know, this is a world first, and China is the first to launch quantum satellite into space.
    1
  17900. @Robert Wakeham Look at SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket debris falling onto a farm in Washington on April 2021. A pressure vessel from a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket stage fell on a man’s farm in Washington State last week, leaving a “4-inch dent in the soil,” Source: SpaceX rocket debris lands on man’s farm in Washington theverge.com/2021/4/2/22364582/spacex-rocket-debris-falls-farm-washington
    1
  17901. About South China Sea, the Vietnam Prime Minister Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese, in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Source: 1958 Diplomatic note from Pham van Dong to Zhou Enlai wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But later, Vietnam suddenly change its mind and started claiming the Paracel and Spratly Islands as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnamese politician can suddenly change their minds just like that?
    1
  17902.  @alexpop3883  said "Anything China will do is only good in short term." The Chinese government has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's direction and future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc, and to set specific goals for China to achieve. Some of these goals include (but are not limited to): -By 2020, China plans to eliminate poverty completely and establish moderately prosperous society. -By 2025, China plans to transform our manufacturing industry to incorporate high-end technology. -By 2030, China plans to be world leader in Artificial Intelligence -By 2035, China plans to be key innovative, scientific power and establish moderately socialist society. -By 2040, China plans to ban all fossil fuel powerplants and all non-electric vehicles for greener future. -By 2045, China plans to be world leading space nation, having established a space elevator. -By 2050, China plans to have surpassed the USA as global superpower, economically and militarily. Source: Xi Plans to Turn China Into a Leading Global Power by 2050 bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-17/xi-to-put-his-stamp-on-chinese-history-at-congress-party-opening By abolishing the presidential term limit, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come into fruition in the future. Whereas in USA for example, US presidents have to step down after 4-8 years when their term is over, so they can only make short-term plans for America's future, instead of long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more, for America.
    1
  17903.  @kaixiang5390  About Peng Shuai, I read Peng Shuai post (full translation available on Reddit) and while she had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man spanning years and was emotional over her breakup, there were no allegations of sexual assault in her post. In fact, Peng Shuai actually consented to sex, she wrote: "Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you."
    1
  17904.  @exiledintheus7251  Chinese workers help make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, sneakers, toys, clothing, etc, cheap, so that inflation in America is kept to a minimum and the cost of living in America is lower than it should be. Think of the billions of dollars Americans saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursues, like cars, luxury brands, housing, etc.
    1
  17905.  @fantared5263  So you told China to "p**s off" over a hypothetical example of Chinese troops and warships in the Solomon Islands (when even you admit there are currently none), yet you seemingly permit the U.S warships sailing to within 12NM of Chinese territorial waters in the Paracel Islands? The U.S has been doing this year after year, here's a list: 2022: USS Benfold sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands. 2021: USS John S McCain sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands. 2020: USS Barry sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands. 2019: USS Wayne E. Meye sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands. 2018: USS Higgins and USS Antietam sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands. 2017: USS Stethem sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands. 2016: USS Decatur sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands. 2015: USS Lassen sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands. ... If anything, shouldn't you be angry over what the USA is currently doing, rather than projecting what U.S is doing onto China?
    1
  17906.  @NoChinaforever17  You lose the argument a million times. South Korea and Japan are even having a trade war at the moment. Source: South Korea and Japan Trade War themacrotrend.com/south-korea-and-japan-trade-war/ On 1st of July 2019, Japanese government removed South Korea from the so-called “white list”, a list of preferred trading partners that do not need to get approval for certain export materials. In particular, Japan announced that it would tighten the export of chemicals that are critical for the South Korean semiconductor industry.
    1
  17907.  @julion89  China is officially atheist under the Communist Party of China. Ultimately, it is the government that maintains control over religion, and not the other way round.
    1
  17908.  @julion89  China is officially atheist under the Communist Party of China.
    1
  17909.  @julion89  Because China is officially atheist?
    1
  17910.  @julion89  Because China is officially atheist under the communist party.
    1
  17911. Because China is official atheist? ​ @julion89 
    1
  17912.  @julion89  "Shenzhou. Are you asking me or answering me?" I'm answering you. But what's your answer had it been a question?
    1
  17913. Even if President Trump found any "supposed violations," it unlikely that USA going do anything about it. China is USA's biggest trading partner, furthermore, Trump stated many times during public speech that China's cooperation is essential to containing the North Korean missile threat in Korean peninsula. Thus, it unlikely USA willing antagonize China during this crucial moment.
    1
  17914.  @wuppas  Chinese food is delicious and people all over the world have proclaimed their love of Chinese food. Want something flavorful? Try our Sweet & Sour Pork. If you want something meaty, we have Peking Duck. If you want something light, we have Dim Sum Dumplings. If you're in a hurry, just grab convenient Baozi (Pork Bun) and eat it on the go. If you like mild spicy, care to try our Kung Pao Chicken? If you like very spicy, dare to try our Mapo Tofu? If you are vegetarian, we have vegetarian Springrolls. And we are tofu heaven. If you like rice, we have Fried Rice. If you like noodles, we have Chow Mein. If you like porridge, we have Congee. If you like soups, we have Hotpot. If you like seafood, well you're in luck, because Chinese love seafood too. Food is life, and no culture celebrates food as much as Chinese culture, whether it is the preparation of food or its consumption.
    1
  17915.  @wuppas  "神州 Shenzhou You live in Canada" When did I ever said that I lived in Canada?
    1
  17916.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Is he allowed to criticize the government? I know you can do it in 🇺🇸." Tell that to Edward Snowden and Julian Assange.
    1
  17917. mercedescl Who says history says that the entire China belongs to Republic of China? The Communist forces drove the KMT out of China and the United Nations stopped recognition of ROC as the government of China.
    1
  17918. ​ @mayurk8697  China on the verge of revolution? Surveys in China have indicated that a majority of Chinese citizens support the government. I think you have China confused with the US, especially as the November election draws closer.
    1
  17919.  @mayurk8697  China on the verge of revolution? I think you have China confused with the US, especially as the elections draw nearer.
    1
  17920.  @icefrost5355  China is home to many of the world's largest banks including ICBC, China Construction Bank, AgBank, Bank of China, Bank of Communications, Postal Savings Bank of China, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank (China), Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, China CITIC Bank, China Minsheng Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Hua Xia Bank, Bank of Beijing, China Guangfa Bank, Bank of Shanghai, Bank of Jiangsu, China Zheshang Bank and so on. Source: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks#By_total_assets
    1
  17921. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17922. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  17923. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17924. Not all Italians can understand English too, so speaking English is is only marginally useful for Chinese tourists in Italy
    1
  17925. @Salam Yamaa Sending normal Chinese translator alone is inadequate, what if Chinese translator don't know Italian laws and Chinese laws? It's better to send Chinese police officers to study Italian and Italian laws, to assist Italian police officers.
    1
  17926. @Salam Yamaa "神州 Shenzhou do you think Chinese police can arrest detain italians" I never said that Chinese police can arrest or detain Italians. The Chinese police in Italy are there to help with cases involving Chinese tourists in Italy that's all. Because of language barriers.
    1
  17927. @Salam Yamaa Because like I said, ordinary Chinese translator may not understand Italian laws and Chinese laws, so why not send Chinese police officers? Do you even read my comment?
    1
  17928. @Salam Yamaa The Chinese police officers need to understand Italian law to explain the Italian law to Chinese tourists.
    1
  17929. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17930. 华为好呀华为美, 华为给我增智慧。
    1
  17931. Many mainland Chinese treat Hong Kong people as part of the family, a relative that studied overseas and has now returned. But sadly, some Hong Kong people treat mainlanders like unwanted relatives that they wished weren't related. Some Hong Kongers, not all of them.
    1
  17932. About the South China Sea, the North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    1
  17933. Mao Zedong did not kill those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong can't possibly control the weather isn't it?
    1
  17934.  @leonal522  Honestly speaking, China's propaganda isn't effective at doing its job. Hardly anyone believe what Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV, Global Times says, even though Chinese media often quote statistics and consult primary sources. On the other hand, American propaganda is very effective. Many people just blindly believe American propaganda even when it's unsubstantiated by facts. China's propaganda just can't hold a candle to America's, otherwise China wouldn't even need to be constantly defending its actions if our propaganda was that good.
    1
  17935.  @leonal522  Western countries have published political propaganda through mass media. Joseph Goebbels had assembled a propaganda machine promoting antisemitism during Nazi Germany, and after the Nazi's surrender, the Americans dismantled the Nazi propaganda apparatus and made use of it to craft American propaganda against the Soviet Union during the Cold War (and now against China).
    1
  17936.  @leonal522  Honestly speaking, China's propaganda isn't effective at doing its job. Hardly anyone believe what Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV, Global Times says, even though Chinese media often quote statistics and consult primary sources. On the other hand, American propaganda is very effective. Many people just blindly believe American propaganda even when it's unsubstantiated by facts. China's propaganda just can't hold a candle to America's, otherwise China wouldn't even need to be constantly defending its actions if our propaganda was that good.
    1
  17937.  @travisconfer2255  Didn't Wikileaks revealled that the U.S government spies on its allies as well as monitor their citizen conversations for keywords relating to terrorism? What makes you seem to think you are free in the West then?
    1
  17938.  @travisconfer2255  Edward Snowden has exposed that the U.S government spies on its allies and secretly monitor their citizens conversations for keywords relating to terrorism. What makes you think you are free?
    1
  17939.  @travisconfer2255  You have American oligarchs like Elon Musk attempting to purchase Twitter, yet you're complaining about Chinese Internet not being free?
    1
  17940.  @travisconfer2255  What makes you think you are free in the West? People gladly give away their personal information on Facebook, and Facebook has even been caught selling their users information.
    1
  17941.  @travisconfer2255  What makes you think you are free in the West? People gladly give away their personal information on Facebook, and they even have been caught selling this information to buyers.
    1
  17942.  @travisconfer2255  What makes you think you're free in the West? Did you know that the U.S government secretly monitors citizens conversations (as exposed by Snowden)?
    1
  17943.  @lissendegn950  Most the world uses Made-in-China products. Look at your computers, electronics, TVs, refrigerators, appliances, gadgets and they are either Made-in-China or contain Made-in-China parts.
    1
  17944.  @lissendegn950  Big business is leaving China? Elon Musk recently opened Tesla's first overseas "gig-factory" in Shanghai.
    1
  17945.  @lissendegn950  Video: Tesla breaks ground on gigafactory in Shanghai youtu.be/XWzWu6awC4w
    1
  17946.  @lissendegn950  Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html
    1
  17947.  Narglar Wing  What examples have Westerners learnt from China?
    1
  17948.  @proudeuropean2  What has Europeans willing to learn from China?
    1
  17949. The U.S accuses mainland China of a potentially banning microchips after a potential invasion of Taiwan island Meanwhile, the U.S's chip act literally bans chips to China. Projecting much?
    1
  17950. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17951. Even the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  17952.  @laserraiset3300  Kievan Rus existed before Ukraine too.
    1
  17953.  @laserraiset3300  Again, whenever the Chinese government prints Yuan, they have certain restraints, such as number of gold reserves, China's economy, and inflation caused by printing money. But the U.S government doesn't take such factors into consideration and they can print Dollarswith impunity.
    1
  17954.  @laserraiset3300  "ok why dollar is so popular worldwide ?" It's because oil-producing countries like Saudi Arabia made a deal to price Saudi oil in U.S dollars (aka the Petrol Dollar). Oil is a commodity that's very much in demand throughout the rest of the world, so this has contributed to the Dollar's longevity as a reserve currency. Because holding Dollars meant that you can buy Saudi Oil. However, recently Saudi Arabia allowing the purchase of oil through other currencies, such as Indian rupee, Russian ruble and Chinese renminbi, and this could spark a potential end to the Petrol Dollar.
    1
  17955.  @laserraiset3300  Kiev is older than Ukraine. In fact, some of Ukraine's territory like Crimea, was actually given to Ukraine by Khrushchev during the Soviet Union, and it was actually historically part of Russia.
    1
  17956.  @bartonlee3594  What makes you think he's beholden to Beijing? Cyrus just wants to see peaceful cooperation between the U.S and China (in which the whole world benefits) rather than confrontation (in which the whole world suffers).
    1
  17957. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17958. So sad that Taiwan need to rely on USA for protection. Once you have to rely on others to survive, then you inevitably become that country's puppet, and that's exactly what's going through with Japan and S. Korea. USA have military bases in Asia, such Okinawa Japan, South Korea, Philippines, etc, until these countries become US puppets. If you rely too much on others to survive, then what happens one day when your allies desert you?
    1
  17959. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17960.  @stunningandbrave2520  So why did Australia join AUKUS to acquire nuclear submarines, and then complain about nuclear threats? If you don't want your country to be the potential target of nuclear strikes, then simply don't get nuclear subs in the first place.
    1
  17961.  @zackk4393  But according to Wikipedia: A Madman's Diary, the diary form was inspired by Nikolai Gogol's short story "Diary of a Madman", as was the idea of the madman who sees reality more clearly than those around him. It's a work of fiction, not based on a true story.
    1
  17962.  @zackk4393  Synopsis: The story was inspired from a fiction entitled “Diary of a madman” written by Nikolai Gogol in 1834. As the title suggests, the story outlines a diary written by a madman. The allegory was conveyed by a first-person narrator. source:wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Madman%27s_Diary#Synopsis
    1
  17963.  @Soraviel  The Communist Party of China transformed China from a previously dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western MSM constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  17964.  @zilun  USA has a fragile economy, look at record 3.28 million Americans file for unemployment as Covid-19 pandemic shuts down US economy. Video: Record 3.3 million Americans file for unemployment benefits in past week youtu.be/fJgEua6Hvws
    1
  17965. Breaking News: The brave US aircraft carrier captain has been dismissed from his position after informing the US government about Covid-19 infection on board the aircraft carrier. A possible punishment for whistle-blowing?
    1
  17966.  @stunningandbrave2520  -The chairman of Anbang Insurance Group (安邦保险集团) was found guilty of fraud and embezzlement. -CEFC China Energy (中国华信能源) used a complex web of affiliated companies to facilitate fake deals, inflate trade figures, and obtain bank loans to fuel its aggressive expansion. -HNA Group Co declared bankruptcy after debt restructuring efforts failed. ... How does that indicate that the state was behind the downfall of those companies?
    1
  17967. ​ @stunningandbrave2520  Many of those companies have been found to be breaking the law, or were already encountering problems. For example, the chairman of Anbang Insurance Group was found guilty of fraud and embezzlement and HNA Group Co declared bankruptcy after debt restructuring efforts failed.
    1
  17968. ​ @stunningandbrave2520  Many of those companies have been found to be breaking the law, or were already encountering problems. For example, the chairman of Anbang Insurance Group was found embezzling money and HNA Group Co declared bankruptcy after debt restructuring efforts failed.
    1
  17969. ​ @stunningandbrave2520  Many of those companies have been found to be breaking the law, or were already encountering problems. For example, CEFC China Energy used a complex web of affiliated companies to facilitate fake deals, inflate trade figures, and obtain bank loans to fuel its aggressive expansion. And HNA Group Co declared bankruptcy after debt restructuring efforts failed.
    1
  17970.  @stunningandbrave2520 Many of those companies have been found to be breaking the law, or were already encountering problems. For example, CEFC China Energy used a complex web of affiliated companies to facilitate fake deals, inflate trade figures, and obtain bank loans to fuel its aggressive expansion
    1
  17971.  @after1001  Statistically speaking, as the world's most populous country, China has the most brainpower to come up with ideas and to make plans, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas to reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and China has 4 times the population of USA, so statistically speaking China should have 4 geniuses to every 1 American genius. Consider two standard bell curves, one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of people in the U.S. That is also true for the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large Populations Have More Geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html
    1
  17972.  @rv8804  Do you have proof that Western students are not getting full degrees from China? I've found some examples here: Video: 10 Reasons to Study in China - Brittney's story youtube.com/watch?v=_rdzLRv5zuQ Why Students study in Universities in China youtube.com/watch?v=ADCIz716v08
    1
  17973.  @rv8804  "神州 Shenzhou you don't need a wife and family to want to run for political office." But he wasn't running for political office, he was protesting. Look at the Hong Kong protest leader, and he's only a mere boy! He's some naive teenager, being swept up in the moment of fervor because of the Western anti-China propaganda. Now his bright future is completely ruined because of his involvement in the protests and is it truly worth it? You said "Also they are protesting the fact their ability to elect their own leaders is being taken away." As far as I know, Hong Kong is still a democracy and the people still get to elect their own leaders. The Hong Kong Chief Executive 香港特首 is elected by a special committee known as the Election Committee 选举委员会 which consists of Hong Kong groups. The mainland does not get to participate in HK elections and the current HK Chief Executive, Carrie Lam, won the 2017 polls, securing over 700 votes out of the 1,200 committee and all the mainland did was approve the candidate that's all. So what seems to be the problem here?
    1
  17974.  @rv8804  That's part of the agreement of Hong Kong's handover to China. According to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 香港基本法第四十五條: The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government So all that mainland Chinese government does is appoint the candidates after all. What is the mainland doing wrong here? The people of Hong Kong still get to elect their leaders and all the mainland does is approve the candidate that's all, as per Hong Kong Basic Law.
    1
  17975.  @rv8804  China is not doing anything wrong, we are observing the Hong Kong Laws that were drafted and acting according to the terms. And if you want "real democracy", during the Umbrella Protests there were about 200,000 HK protestors, whereas the entire population of Hong Kong is 7,000,000, so isn't it clear that majority of Hong Kong residents are fine with it? Why should the majority of Hong Kong give into the demands of the minority then you tell me?
    1
  17976. @bd z "naw china cant play, no pieces to make a move." China doesn't really need to do anything. Eventually, President Trump will have to step down when his presidential term is over and what if the next POTUS decides to reverse Trump's policies and lift the US-China tradewar, thus restoring trade relations between our countries to pre-tradewar levels? All that effort would have amounted to naught.
    1
  17977.  @AIRBORNEUSARMY-kl5ot  "神州 Shenzhou, U r so wrong at so many lvl. " You are always welcome to prove my points wrong. And YouTube isn't illegal in China, since nobody come arrest you if you log on to YT while in China. My sources come from all over the world, and you are always welcome to come refute my points if you disagree with me.
    1
  17978.  @Ron20042004 "神州 Shenzhou how many US companies are owned by the US government (SOE’s). See the difference." In China, the government controls the Chinese companies to benefit China, whereas in USA, the companies control US government for their own benefit. The defense industry control the government to declare war on Middle East country for oil, and Americans often lament how the Jews are controlling the US government. That's why US companies left America to set up shop in low wage countries like China or Vietnam. Because US companies are loyal to money, not country. Chinese companies are loyal to country, not money. China is investing overseas, but we are making sure to hire Chinese workers and stimulate our economy so China can become better. See the difference for youself
    1
  17979.  @Ron20042004  President Xi sent his daughter to Western university so that she can learn what Western government system and then bring her knowledge back to China. China clearly wins, because we are gaining knowledge about others and if Chinese studying in Western country get granted a job in the West (they deprive your local graduates of a job) and then rise to high government position, they can become potential future spies for recruitment by the CCP. And if they don't get a job overseas, they are always welcome come back to China (saving China the resources needed to train this student. Thanks a lot!) and bring their knowledge and technology to China. This process is called "reverse brain drain" and many Chinese graduates overseas are returning to China for a number of reasons: -President Trump’s trade war with China has certainly made many Chinese people feel less comfortable about living and working in the US. -It has also become more difficult to get a working visa for the US, thwarting many graduate students who get offers to work there but are forced to return home. -But by far the biggest attraction is homegrown opportunity. This is especially true in the tech space, where the Valley’s bright lights are being increasingly drowned out by mainland China’s tech hubs, such as Shenzen and Beijing. Source: China's reverse brain drain: Nation columnist straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/chinas-reverse-brain-drain-nation-columnist So once again, China wins, for the above described reasons.
    1
  17980.  @after1001  China is home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, Sunway Taihulight 神威·太湖之光 and Tianhe-2 天河-2 and in 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source: China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion). There, China has an edge over the USA when it comes to research using supercomputers.
    1
  17981.  @after1001  Besides dominating the world in supercomputers, China also unveiled exascale supercomputer prototype that can perform 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 calculations per second! and is able to quickly analyze massive volumes of data, which will have a profound impact on our everyday life. Video: China launches exascale supercomputer prototype youtube.com/watch?v=bPIvoVoUGMY
    1
  17982. It is apparent that sanctions simply do not work on North Korea, so why continue imposing sanctions if it doesn't work? North Korea is mostly targeting US military bases in South Korea, Okinawa Japan and also Guam, so what is Chinese government to do about this? If America choose withdrawing all/some of its troops from those bases, it would do much more to ease tensions along Korean peninsula than any sanctions China could impose. If imposing sanctions clearly do not work, then why not try a different approach instead? It's insane keep on repeating same method again and again, and somehow expect the result to be any different this time.
    1
  17983. China has long history of mining. Ancient Chinese miners drilled the world's first water wells, oil wells, salt wells, brine mines, even natural gas using methods like percussion drilling and borehole drilling, constructing derricks made from bamboo and using bamboo pipes to siphon gas.
    1
  17984.  @srouji6  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has seen the rise and fall of other nations, and survived the violent course of history to the modern day relatively intact, so what makes you think China is different?
    1
  17985. The more NATO supports Ukraine, the more territory Ukraine loses ..
    1
  17986. 25,000SubsWithOutAnyVideos Then why didn't Kim Jung Un just visit Washington directly if it was Trump's doing, instead of coming to Beijing? The last time USA and North Korea had disarmament talks was during Six Party Talks, which was held in Beijing. Without China, USA and North Korea have zero chances of entering dialogue, and just interact with each other by missile test and sanctions that's all.
    1
  17987. 25,000SubsWithOutAnyVideos President Trump also publicly stated China's cooperation is essential to containing the missile crisis on Korean peninsula. It is through these meetings that Beijing managed to extract word of denuclearization from Pyongyang, so why shouldn't China's efforts be recognised, if Trump wants to claim credit for this?
    1
  17988. Trump claims credit for China meeting with Kim Jong un Source:thetimes (dot) co (dot) uk/article/trump-claims-credit-for-china-meeting-with-kim-jong-un-6wv7n6mf0
    1
  17989.  @Andy-P  Taiwan is experiencing stagnant wage growth. According to Forbes article entitled "Why Taiwan's Wages Are Low For A Developed Asian Economy." Taiwanese can earn 1.2 to 1.3 times more pay in mainland China than at home for skilled, non-entry level jobs. Cost of living in mainland China is also (generally) much lower than in Taiwan.
    1
  17990. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  17991.  @Andy-P  Tencent is just shy of $80 billion behind TSMC. Also, you wrote that the Total Market Capitalisation by Country is:- Total market cap (in mil. US$) Total market cap (% of GDP) United States 49,653,000 194.5 China 10,889,318 65.1 Japan 5,474,985 126.7 India 4,276,000 120 ... So isn't mainland China in the lead here compared to Taiwan island?
    1
  17992.  @Andy-P  Found the rest of the info in Wikipedia: List of countries by stock market capitalization Total market cap (in mil. US$) Total market cap (% of GDP) 1. United States 49,653,000 194.5 2. Mainland China 10,889,318 65.1 3. Japan 5,474,985 126.7 4. India 4,276,000 120 5. Hong Kong, China 3,966,952 1,262. ... 12. Taiwan, China 2,007,560 267.1 So Mainland China is ahead of Taiwan in market capitalization
    1
  17993.  @Andy-P  Mainland China is also home to the world's largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Taiwan's hi-speed rail in terms of track length. High-Speed Railway (HSR) Construction by Country (2019) 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. France (3,870 km) 4. Germany (3,596 km) 5. Japan (3,422 km) ...
    1
  17994.  @Andy-P  Explain how will democracy and independent institutions will help the Taiwanese economy? Had they worked, then why is Taiwanese economy stagnating even under a Western-style democracy? Taiwan economy flourished previously under authoritarian single-party KMT rule (i.e Taiwan Miracle) then why fix what isn't broken?
    1
  17995.  @Andy-P  Common Prosperity (共同富裕) is the top priority. That's why a survey by Harvard University and Ash Center found that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Chinese government.
    1
  17996.  @Andy-P  With just 40% of the vote, not only did Lai Ching-te failed to secure a simple majority with at least 50% of the vote, but out of the 19 million registered Taiwan voters, only 72% of voters actually turned out to vote. That effectively means Lai garnered a meagre 28% of the entire registered vote for the election.
    1
  17997. "East Turkestan" is a fake name coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists (including Nikita Bichurin) who intended the name to replace the common Western term for the region, Chinese Turkestan. There was never historically such a country, it was just renaming of a Chinese region.
    1
  17998.  @ivyngo110  "Why did i know that , cause my people ( Vietnamese) they’re doing the same thing" Why are Vietnamese in Mexico crossing the border to go the America then?
    1
  17999.  @ivyngo110  "神州 Shenzhou if China were so great, why not going back to China ?" If you watch Cyrus' latest video, it turns out that many Chinese in America are returning to our homeland.
    1
  18000. Isn't modern science based upon ancient science and technology? Where would modern science be today if not for ancient science? Ancient science forms the foundation in which modern science is built upon isn't it? For example, rocket science would not be possible, if it weren't for the Chinese invention of the rocket now isn't it? Regarding Fusion Reactors, China also had our very "artificial sun" experiment at the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) in Heifi, China, setting a new world record for longest sustained nuclear fusion reaction by superheating hydrogen to form plasma at temperatures of over 90 million degrees (approximately three times hotter than the core of the Sun) for record-breaking 102 seconds, overtaking Germany's Wendelstein 7-X experimental fusion reactor. Source:China's Experimental Fusion Reactor Hits Major Milestone popsci.com/chinas-experimental-fusion-reactor-hits-major-milestone You want me to name one thing that is being used right now and have contribution from Chinese space agency? China launched the world's first quantum satellite, Micius, and demonstrated that quantum entanglement between two states can occur at distances above the stratosphere. Quantum entanglement is when two subatomic particles share their quantum states and can influence each other's states, seemingly independent of the distance involved. One particle could be on surface on the Earth, and the other on the surface of the Moon, and still, they can affect each other through entanglement. Scientist have been testing this distance to the limits and the longest distance ever recorded for Quantum entanglement effect on Earth is 143km along the Canary Islands. However China has shown that two stations located 1200km apart (Delingha station and Lijiang station) can communicate with each other through secure transmissions by quantum satellite. Video:Quantum satellite achieves 'spooky action' at record distance youtube.com/watch?v=4QlcKuxDGrs
    1
  18001. Ajay Singh China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilizations still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since faded to history. Also, I have never said China invented those modern inventions, all I said was that ancient Chinese inventions helped form the bedrock for modern inventions that's all. Chinese people may not have invented the wheel, but another significant invention in human history is the gear and the oldest cogwheels in the world were found in China dating back to 4th century BCE, which have been preserved at the Luoyang Museum of Henan Province, China. I never said China wasn't part of ITER or that China invented the fusion reactor, all I said was China's very own fusion reactor made a milestone in sustaining extreme fusion reaction temperatures for a record breaking 100 over seconds. Can you imagine anyplace on Earth sustaining temperatures three times hotter than the Sun, for over a minute? That's why it's called China's "artificial sun experiment". You previously claimed China has never triumphed Japan in any field, and I proven it wrong with China's hi-speed rail. You asked me to name a contribution from Chinese space agency, and I explained how China's quantum satellite satellite help prove that quantum entanglement works at distances above the stratosphere. Why are you being so dismissive of China's achievements in space, hi-speed rail, radio telescopes, quantum satellite and experimental fusion reactors? China is ancient civilization as well as modern space nation, so why can't Chinese take pride in our achievements? Asians are just as capable of achieving equally impressive accomplishments as Westerners.
    1
  18002. Bernard Lim China is also working on a space telescope of our own to rival Hubble Space Telescope with 300 times the coverage. With such a wide field of view, the space telescope could survey 40 percent of the cosmos in ten years. Zhou Jianping, the head of China's manned space program, noted that such a wide field-of-view would create a higher fidelity image to search for dark matter, dark energy, and exoplanets. Source:China's Answer To The Hubble Telescope popsci.com/chinas-answer-to-hubble-telescope
    1
  18003.  @antonysmyth2464  "Russian troops were at the NATO border from 1945 onwards." NATO was formed in 1949, so how was Russian troops at the NATO border in 1945? Where did you learn your history? Also, you're talking about the oppressed peoples of the USSR, yet it's Russians (and Belarusian) athletes, chess players, musicians, composers, etc, that are being oppressed so how's this Western freedom?
    1
  18004. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18005. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18006. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18007. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18008. Beijing is now the first city in the world to have the honor of hosting both the Summer Olympics (Beijing 2008) and the Winter Olympics (2022).
    1
  18009.  @MarkYeung1  Of course not everyone in Hong Kong is a separatist, but there are some small percentage of people in Hong Kong who support separatism that are causing trouble for everyone in Hong Kong. So if you're against those few Hong Kong separatists, does that means you support the Hong Kong National Security Law to root out separatism, secession, subversion, terrorism, and collusion with foreign organizations inside Hong Kong against the Central People's Government (aka Beijing)? After all, every state has its own National Security Law (even the USA used theirs during the 6th Jan Capitol Hill riots) and so does Hong Kong today.
    1
  18010.  @MarkYeung1  So we agree that not every Hong Konger is a separatist, but there still exist some percentage of separatists living in Hong Kong, and if we do nothing, those few Hong Kong separatists can grow in power (especially with foreign funding) and cause lots of trouble in Hong Kong for the rest of the non-separatist. That's why the Hong Kong National Security Law is needed to root out the separatists, else they will get away with their activities. You said: "National security laws are important, but with that kind of mentality it will be abused by China." Do you actually have evidence that the Hong Kong National Security Law will be abused by Beijing? Otherwise, this is just your own negative speculation without proof of it happening. Just like in 2019, the Hong Kong Extradition Bill was initially proposed by Carrie Lam because of some Hong Kong guy (named Chan), who took his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan, and then proceeded to strangle her to death, before flying back to Hong Kong alone and leaving the Taiwan authorities to find her body in the hotel. The man has since confessed to his crime, and Taiwan wanted to extradite this Hong Kong murderer to face justice for his crimes. But Hong Kong has no extradition treaty with Taiwan, that's why the Hong Kong Extradition Bill was proposed to cover up this legal loophole. But then the Hong Kong protestors caused the Extradition Bill to be scrapped, and now a Hong Kong murderer is loose and unable to be charged in Hong Kong court, because the crime occurred in Taiwan not Hong Kong.
    1
  18011.  @MarkYeung1  Those Hong Kong separatists are a small minority yes, but they made the most impact, stirring up troubles and threatening to separate Hong Kong from the mainland, so steps needed to be taken to root out separatism, secession, subversion, terrorism, and collusion with foreign organizations inside Hong Kong. And if Hong Kong didn't have foreign funding, then how could Ted Cruz fly all the way form the USA to come to Hong Kong and support the protests? Why was Joshua Wong photographed speaking with U.S senators? Clearly the Hong Kong National Security Law was necessary to clean up separatism in Hong Kong, even you agreed that Hong Kong needed a national security law.
    1
  18012.  @MarkYeung1  The fact that the Hong Kong Extradition Bill has been scrapped is a travesty, now the Hong Kong murderer (Chan) that committed his crime in Taiwan had gotten away scot free. And since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to seek justice for the victims family. Do the 2019 Hong Kong protestors even understand the significance of the Hong Kong Extradition Bill being scrapped? Now there's a loophole in the legal system where potential criminals can commit crimes in other states and then flee to Hong Kong, so what of this crime happens again?
    1
  18013.  @MarkYeung1  "Ask the Hong Kong people what drove them to the street? Ask them what do they worry about?" I already did, it's because of the evils of Capitalism in Hong Kong that allows the Hong Kong property tycoons to jack up real estate prices to be beyond the affordability of young Hong Kong couples seeking to apply for an apartment and settle down. The Hong Kong government closes one eye to the insane land sales, because Hong Kong is a tax haven for capitalists The Hong Kong government cannot tax businesses, so the government can only earn revenue from taxing land sales. So there's an incentive for Hong Kong government to overlook the rising land prices. The problems faced by young Hong Kong couples are the result of capitalism, not by Beijing. But the "colonial mentality" influenced the Hong Kongers (but not all) to blame Beijing for encroaching onto freedoms, when the freedom indices consistently list Hong Kong as among the world's freest, for example in Index of Freedom in the World (8.81) and Economic Freedom of the World (8.91).
    1
  18014.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Ask them why so many have left?" Although many of them still live in Hong Kong (7 million), mainland China holds the largest number of Hong Kong expatriates (472,900) although the Hong Kong diaspora can also be found in several English-speaking countries. Here's a list of where Hong Kongers can be found: Hongkongers: Total population (c. 7.33 million) Regions with significant populations 1. Hong Kong (7,234,800) 2. Mainland China (472,900) 3. United States (330,000) 4. Canada (215,775) 5. United Kingdom (145,000) 6. Taiwan (87,719) 7. Australia (86,886) 8. Macau (19,355) 9. Netherlands (18,300) 10. Japan (18,210) ... Source: Wikipedia: Hongkongers
    1
  18015.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Since capitalism is so evil, why don't you ask the Hong Kong government to scrap it?" Hey, I'm Chinese, but I'm not from Hong Kong, how can I ask the Hong Kong government to scrap capitalism? It's a decision that's up to the people of Hong Kong, who elected their government to decide, not for me as mainlander. All I did was point out how capitalism influenced the Hong Kong property tycoons to increase land prices to beyond the reach of young couples seeking to apply for an apartment and settle down in Hong Kong. You said: "You mainlanders think we are so evil. Like comments like colonial 走狗 towards HongKongers." Read my words again, I said that capitalism itself is evil, not that people from Hong Kong are evil in general. The word 走狗 doesn't really mean "evil" per say, it's English translation would be "lapdog" that someone who is influenced or controlled by another. In this case, it refers to those people are still trapped under the subservient "colonial mentality" not that they are evil. In fact, if you talk to mainlanders, most of us consider the people of Hong Kong as our fellow countrymen, it's only those few separatists that make up a small minority, but make a significant impact.
    1
  18016.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou You said the separatists in Hong Kong are making the most impacts, I disagree, and the Beijing government agrees with me." If the Beijing government agrees with you then why would Beijing implement the Hong Kong national security law to root out separatism in Hong Kong? It's clearly because Beijing thinks that separatists make an impact in Hong Kong (despite them being a minority) that's why they implemented the national security law in Hong Kong, yet you claim Beijing agrees with you? How does your logic stand? You said: "Do you notice the racist mainlanders are making the most impacts? Do you know why so many have left Hong Kong?" I don't even know how you think mainlanders can be racist towards our own fellow Chinese in Hong Kong. We are both, then how are mainlanders racist to people in Hong Kong? And you claim so many have left Hong Kong, but again, it turns out that mainland China holds the largest number of Hong Kong expatriates outside of Hong Kong. Here's the statistics again: Hongkongers: Total population (c. 7.33 million) Regions with significant populations 1. Hong Kong (7,234,800) 2. Mainland China (472,900) 3. United States (330,000) 4. Canada (215,775) 5. United Kingdom (145,000) 6. Taiwan (87,719) 7. Australia (86,886) 8. Macau (19,355) 9. Netherlands (18,300) 10. Japan (18,210) ... Source: Wikipedia: Hongkongers So if mainlanders were racist according to you, then why'd so many Hong Kongers immigrate to the mainland?
    1
  18017.  @MarkYeung1  Ukraine has lost its sovereignty since the 2014 coup d'etat, ousting former Ukrainian President Yanokovych and installing a US puppet in place.
    1
  18018.  @MarkYeung1  Ukraine has lost its sovereignty since the 2014 coup d'etat by the US, ousting former Ukrainian President Yanokovych and installing a puppet in place.
    1
  18019.  @item6931  Even MCF Energy can see who's really behind Nordstream. Why support countries that destroy pipeline infrastructure, rather than build them?
    1
  18020.  @item6931  Even MCF Energy can see who's really behind Nordstream, so can't it support countries that build infrastructure instead of those that target them?
    1
  18021. @TRUTH EXPRESS "神州 Shenzhou dogs considered as men's best friend is considered as a "standard" internationally." What "standard" internationally? Dogs are considered haram in Muslim law, who are you to dictate what is international standard?
    1
  18022.  @item6931  Not only that, but China is importing cheap Russian gas at a discount and then selling it to the West are at premium, hence bypassing the so-called "oil price cap" that was imposed on Russian oil by NATO.
    1
  18023.  @item6931  A more recent article from CNN Business, APR 17 2023, had the title: Russia’s oil exports are back to pre-war levels Moscow’s exports of crude oil and oil products rose in March to their highest level since April 2020, jumping by 600,000 barrels a day, the International Energy Agency (IEA) said in its monthly oil report Friday. The rise lifted Russia’s estimated revenue from oil exports to $12.7 billion last month.
    1
  18024.  @item6931  You said: "Did you know that China imports more than 40% of its LNG from AU alone?" China could always switch to cheap Russian gas delivered through pipeline, instead of importing LNG from AU ships.
    1
  18025.  @item6931  LNG ships are far more visible and vulnerable targets to piracy. Not to mention that USA, Canada, Australia have to ship LNG to Europe, which is far more costly then sending cheap Russian gas through pipelines. Speaking of which, Germany should listen to award-winning investigative journalist, Seymour Hersh's article on who was behind Nordstream, and who profits from its destruction.
    1
  18026.  @item6931  Also, Russian gas is delivered to China through the Power of Siberia gas pipeline which runs through Russia/China border. It's far more unlikely to sabotage this pipeline delivering cheap Russian gas to China, given its location.
    1
  18027.  @MarkYeung1  Good news. Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke to Zelenskyy in a phone call. This demonstrates China's commitment to peace and talking with both sides to reach a peaceful resolution to the conflict. This is in sharp contrast to the U.S opposing this peace plans, and continually sending military aid to Ukraine.
    1
  18028.  @item6931  "Hahaha I see that my last post here was shadow banned," Did you perhaps violate YouTube's terms of use in your post?
    1
  18029.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "He has family members in Kiev who had their apartment bombed by MIG aircraft." Those MiG aircraft turned out to be from the Ukrainian Air Force (whom also operates Russian/Soviet era aircraft). After all, how could Russian MIGs have flown so close to Kiev, Ukraine's capital, without being shot down by Ukraine's missile defenses?
    1
  18030.  @bartonlee3594  Throughout history, Ukraine's territory shifted hands many times and it was part of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, the Austrian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Tsardom of Russia, and of course the Soviet Union. In fact, the name of Ukraine is derived from the old Slavic term for "borderland".
    1
  18031.  @bartonlee3594  "Witness how Stalin starved the Ukraine during WWII." Ukraine had gotten involved with a certain fascist ideology during WWII and the Holocaust of Ukraine resulted in the murder of some 1.5 million Jews at the hands of these people.
    1
  18032. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18033. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18034. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18035. 觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18036. 觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18037. 说真的翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18038. 觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18039. 觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18040. ​ @d9918  Huawei has replaced Android OS with its own domestic HarmonyOS, and the Play Store has been replaced with Huawei App Gallery.
    1
  18041.  @d9918  Huawei AppGallery is Huawei's answer to Google's Play Store.
    1
  18042.  @d9918  App Gallery is Huawei's answer to Google's Play Store.
    1
  18043.  Gregory Jones  The rate of mutation of the coronavirus can be greatly slowed by preventing transmission of the coronavirus.
    1
  18044. I wouldn't want Twitter anyway, given that it's going against its own hate speech policy, and allowing posts by users calling for the "death of Russians". Who knows, one day in the future Twitter might do the same against Chinese (if they aren't already) no way I'm going to support Twitter at all.
    1
  18045. China never promised India that we will halt road constructions "forever". Its just that Winter is Coming and so is the upcoming BRICS summit. This is Chinese strategy, "retreat 1 step to advance 2 step" from Sun Zi's The Art of War.
    1
  18046.  @jeremyhoe3371  You said: "Everyone share the prosperity and wealth of the country economy." But that's precisely the principle of communist/socialist ideology, yet you're claiming China is in every way a capitalist country?
    1
  18047.  @jeremyhoe3371  You said: "Everyone share the prosperity and wealth of the country economy." but isn't this the goal of comunists?
    1
  18048.  @tftfgubedgukm7911  "神州 Shenzhou For all you know, Putin might want Taiwan for himself" If that's the case, then Taiwan can count on mainland China to defend Taiwan Island from being annexed by Russia. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China and the People's Liberation Army would do whatever it takes to ensure it remains so.
    1
  18049. Throughout Chinese history, if China is being ruled by tyrannical leader, the common people/peasants rise up to overthrow the current dynasty and establish a new dynasty. This is part of the "Mandate of Heaven" where a competent ruler will remain in power and an incompetent ruler will be ousted by the people. Many Chinese dynasties met their end at the hands of the common people but this principle has guided China for 4000-5000 years quite successfully.
    1
  18050. Mordant221 Exactly what do you know about Tiananmen incident? The protestors were anti-Deng (Deng Xiaoping introduced capitalism to replace China's communist market system) If such important Chinese leader like Deng was voted off, then where would China be today? China would have fragmented into different provinces, just like when Soviet Union collapsed and the satellite states broke free of Soviet rule. And if people were truly unhappy with the government, they would have organised more protests afterwards wouldn't they?
    1
  18051.  @MegumiFushiguro195  It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set and many economists firmly believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's economy sometime in the foreseeable future.
    1
  18052. In US pop culture, there are popular catchphrases like "F**K THE POLICE" and all it does is encourage lack of respect for authority and make policemen lives more difficult.
    1
  18053. +bungybooce Hip Hop got so many lyrics about drug abuse, sex, violence, so why can't I just pick one out? What about the catchphrase "Thug Life" that also encourage youths to commit crime, disrespect authority, indulge in violence, experiment with drugs and sex, because apparently, it is cool to do so? I am not alone in my opinion. Many other people in this comment section have expressed similar dislike towards Hip Hop as a whole as well. Look at what this original post is about.
    1
  18054. PMs as in Precious Metals? I think it's difficult because countries are unwilling to risk their own gold reserves (which may be needed to back their own local currencies).
    1
  18055.  @doeizen1092  Singapore politicians use euphemisms for "lockdown" because they want to avoid a repeat of people panic stockpiling. Video: Singapore to close most workplaces for one month youtu.be/HawLDWSL-lc
    1
  18056.  @fazotakeiteasy  Bitcoin is literally backed by nothing
    1
  18057.  @fazotakeiteasy  Are you one of those people paid to promote Bitcoin so as to increase its value?
    1
  18058.  @fazotakeiteasy  Then why did you claim earlier: "if you say bitcoin I will agree !"?
    1
  18059.  @fazotakeiteasy  Well, then I can also make a statement that China's Central Bank Digital Currency (i.e Digital Renminbi) might someday become an alternative to the USD in the future.
    1
  18060.  @fazotakeiteasy  You said: "Reason why the Renminbi will never be the world currency is because China wont be able to control it outside their borders." That's precisely the reason why Reminbi might became an alternative to the USD, because the U.S government has been weaponizing its currency against countries that disobey or go against the U.S. The fact that China won't be able to control the RMB outside of our borders, makes the RMB more attractive as an alternative to the tyranny of the U.S dollar. You said: "Then you have stability... the renminbi is not stable, doesn't have transparency, doesn't have the trust of people around the world "countries"." Renminbi is NOT Bitcoin. What you're describing is basically a cryptocurrency where it is highly volatile, a lack of transparency and isn't trusted by the rest of the world to be used as currency. At most only a handful of countries accept Bitcoin as actual payment during transactions, while Renminbi is certainly far more accepted around the world than crypto. Yet you think Bitcoin will do better than Renminbi as an alternative to the Dollar?
    1
  18061.  @fazotakeiteasy  You said: "Also keep in mind that the only reason that China has become a rich country is because the United States allowed it to happen." Not really, the only reason that China has become rich is because of Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms in the late 1970s, not because of the United States. How can the U.S affect communist party policy? If anything, it should be the Communist Party of China that should be credited with bringing economic prosperity to China, not the U.S You said: "All the industry, American companies that went to China ....helped the chinese economy grow for years!!!" Yes, but the American companies paid Chinese workers a pittance and housed them in poor working conditions. Statistics show that for every dollar of profit that American companies like Apple or Nike made in China, Chinese workers were only earning 10 cents (or less). Only through Chinese workers scrimping and saving up hundreds of thousands of 10 cents over the years, did China managed to lift some 800 million out of poverty.
    1
  18062.  @fazotakeiteasy  You said: "If American companies were to leave- china would be doomed." China has many companies of our own that make it onto lists like Fortune Global 500. In fact, China ranks 1st in the list with the most number companies on the Global 500 with USA ranking 2nd. List of the Top 10 countries with the highest revenues top 500 companies as of August 2022 1. China (145) 2. United States (124) 3. Japan (47) 4. Germany (28) 5. France (25) 6. United Kingdom (18) 7. South Korea (16) 8. Switzerland (14) 9. Canada (12) 10. Netherlands (11) ... Source: Fortune Global 500 So what makes you think China would be doomed if the U.S companies pulled out of China?
    1
  18063.  @fazotakeiteasy  You said: "Another point is that the world knows that the chinese make a lot of stuff... but the products that they make are are stolen and make of knockoff versions" The same could be said of the United States over a century ago. The U.S pirated much of U.K's IP during the 19th century and American factories turned out adulterated foods and willfully mislabeled products. When Charles Dickens first stepped off the boat in Boston in 1842, he found the city's bookstores rife with pirated copies of his novels, along with those of his countrymen and was stunned by the level of literacy piracy in the USA. American manufacturers, distributors, and vendors of food began tampering with their products en masse -- bulking out supplies with cheap filler, using dangerous additives to mask spoilage or to give foodstuffs a more appealing color. Candy was found to contain arsenic and dyed with copper chloride; conniving brewers mixed extracts of "nux vomica," a tree that yields strychnine, to simulate the bitter taste of hops. Pickles contained copper sulphate, and custard powders yielded traces of lead. Sugar was blended with plaster of Paris, as was flour. Milk had been watered down, then bulked up with chalk and sheep's brains. Hundred-pound bags of coffee labeled "Fine Old Java" turned out to consist of three-fifths dried peas, one-fifth chicory, and only one-fifth coffee. ... Food, of course, was only the beginning. In the literary realm, for most of the 19th century the United States remained an outlaw in the world of international copyright. The nation's publishers merrily pirated books without permission, and without paying the authors or original publishers a dime. In one industry after another, 19th-century American producers churned out counterfeit products in remarkable quantities, slapping fake labels on locally made knockoffs of foreign ales, wines, gloves, and thread. As one expose at the time put it: "We have 'Paris hats' made in New York, 'London Gin' and 'London Porter' that never was in a ship's hold, 'Superfine French paper' made in Massachusetts." ... Source: Archive Boston: A nation of outlaws
    1
  18064.  @fazotakeiteasy  You said: "Bitcoin will out perform any property, currency , commodity, treasury in the future." Are you sure you're not one of those people being paid to promote Bitcoin, when you write statements such as this? You said: "The Renminbi is just a piece of paper that is used to transact just like the dollar."" The Renminbi also has a digital form, the Digital Renminbi (aka Central Bank Digital Currency) that enjoys all the advantages of a paperless form of currency. China's Renminbi is trusted enough to be used in business transactions in many countries, but you can't say the same of Bitcoin, which is not accepted as actual payment for transactions in many countries. You said: "The dollar is the world currency because it's backed by the best, strongest, smartest economy, military." The U.S is in decline and China is rising. Many economists predict that China's economy is expected to surpass the United States someday in the foreseeable future. Does this also imply that the Renminbi might become an alternative to the world currency someday? Who knows? You said: "China wants to be democratic but it's a communist country therefore the renminbi will depreciate over time as it is and so will the dollar." Does a country have to adopt Western style liberal democracy to become successful? If anything, China's political system has shown that not all countries have to adopt Western-style liberal democracy to be successful.
    1
  18065.  @fazotakeiteasy  You said: "You can chose to be a fool and be proud of the renminbi or you can make a smart decision and research the blockchain, bitcoin network and make the switch." You're really starting to sound more and more like someone being paid to promote Bitcoin, given that you're resorting to hurling persona insults against others, just because our views are different. You said: "Bitcoin is volatile just like the rest of all the markets" That pretty much makes Bitcoin unsuitable as an alternative to the USD, because one of the requirements you outlined earlier was stability, an attribute that the Renminbi possesses that Bitcoin doesn't. In fact, the RMB is comparatively a stable currency in the emerging markets. ... Source: The Economist:The yuan has been one of the world’s most stable major currencies. You said: "Like I've said before... I don't care if you like bitcoin or not. It's your life not mine." Then why'd you resort to hurling personal insults against me for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    1
  18066.  @fazotakeiteasy  You said: "You can chose to be a fool and be proud of the renminbi or you can make a smart decision and research the blockchain, bitcoin network and make the switch." You're really starting to sound just like someone paid to promote Bitcoin. You're even resorting to hurling personal insults against me just (i.e calling me a fool) just because my views happen to differ from yours. You said: "Bitcoin is volatile just like the rest of all the markets" That already makes Bitcoin unsuitable as an alternative to the Dollar, because one of the requirements you outlined earlier was stability, which is an attribute that the Renminbi possesses that Bitcoin doesn't. In fact, the RMB is comparatively a stable currency in the emerging markets. You said: "Like I've said before... I don't care if you like bitcoin or not. It's your life not mine." Then why'd you resort to calling me a fool just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    1
  18067.  @fazotakeiteasy  Americans copied much of German technology after WWII. At the beginning of WWII, American tanks were largely inferior to German tanks, but after the Germans surrendered, the Americans absorbed German Panzer (tank) technology and that's why American tanks became powerful. The Nazi Airforce (Lufthwaffe) had such successful aircraft designs that the Americans copied it. Even Nazi V2-Rocket Scientists were put to work on NASA's Moon landing missions. Source: The Greatest Intellectual Property Theft in History: Operation Paperclip – The plunder of Germany’s scientific and industrial knowledge after World War Two.
    1
  18068.  @intothewrx  Bruce Lee was from a different era when USA was strong and China was weak. Now, it is clear that USA is in decline and China is rising, so why don't you ask Jackie Chan what the current winds are?
    1
  18069.  @intothewrx  Bruce Lee isn't around to observe China's rise in the modern world, so what makes you think his answer is still relevant today? Times are changing, what makes you think you can apply a dead man's answer to today's times?
    1
  18070.  @intothewrx  Why do you insist on words uttered by Bruce Lee during a bygone era? Jackie Chan has lived through that era and he has witnessed China's rise today so why don't you ask him whether he considers himself Chinese or not?
    1
  18071.  @intothewrx  What did Jackie Chan say?
    1
  18072.  @intothewrx  Why don't you respond to my earlier question: Could you explain how China broke the Sino-British declaration? Hong Kong today currently has their own government separate from the mainland. Hong Kong has their own separate judiciary system. Hong Kong has their own separate passport (Hong Kong passport) as well as separate currency (Hong Kong dollars). The Hong Kong people vote in elections for their favourite leaders and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections. So how exactly did China break the Sino-British declaration?
    1
  18073.  @intothewrx  Hong Kong was once a flourishing port city under British colonial rule, while the mainland was still dirt-poor in the past. But today, fortunes have reversed and Hong Kong has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan, and is facing increasing levels of competition from other upcoming port cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports Source: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage#2012%E2%80%932017 No wonder why the people of Hong Kong slowly feel like they are being left behind, as mainland port cities start surpassing Hong Kong.
    1
  18074.  @qinby1182  "神州 Shenzhou Hong Kong was once a flourishing port city under British colonial rule" This statement of mine still rings true. Which part of this statement is wrong? Also you said: "The slave trade was a flourishing business." This statement of yours is true too. Don't you know the definition of " flourishing"? Flourishing means thriving; prosperous, when does flourishing refer to whether something was detrimental or not? Flourishing simply means that a certain industry, region, etc is thriving, it doesn't refer to whether it's good or bad to certain groups of people, so what's wrong with these two statements?
    1
  18075.  @qinby1182  "No wonder why the people of Hong Kong slowly feel like they are being left behind, as mainland port cities start surpassing Hong Kong." This statement of mine still rings true. Which part is incorrect? You said: "It is about the economy stupid." Who are you calling stupid, when your statement literally supports my earlier statement?
    1
  18076.  @intothewrx  "神州 Shenzhou use your words" You're the one constantly posting the same post again and again.
    1
  18077.  @intothewrx  Why don't you answer my earlier questions if you want ask me questions?
    1
  18078.  @qinby1182  You said: "It is about the economy stupid." Who are you calling stupid, in that comment addressed to me?
    1
  18079.  @intothewrx  Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Hong Kong as compared to the mainland? How can Hong Kong possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  18080.  @MarkYeung1  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country, where the previous Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1917-1949) failed to achieve.
    1
  18081.  @MarkYeung1  "Chinese sanction on Australia is another example." What sanctions did China impose on Australia? It's true that China imposed tariffs on Australian wine and barley, but Australian wine can still be purchased in China, so what are you talking about?
    1
  18082. Matt Hoehn Even if such a railway existed between Washington and and Pyongyang, do you think Kim would even make use of it to visit Washington for disarmament talks? The last time USA and N. Korea had disarmament talks were during the Six Party Talks, and that was held in Beijing. The sanctions were UN sanctions not just by USA, and it required the agreement of all involved parties, including China's, for it to be binding. China opposed North Korea's missile testing which was conducted during the 2017 BRICS summit held in Xiamen, China, presumably showing N. Korea's defiance against China, so China agreed to sanctions as a way to punish N. Korea that's all. If Trump wants to take credit for that, then why does he often state that China's cooperation is essential to containing the missile crisis on Korean peninsula?
    1
  18083. Matt Hoehn How exactly is China being isolated? China is biggest trade partners with many countries, such USA Japan, Korea, etc, all despite China trading with N. Korea as well, so why do you claim China is being isolated for aiding the regime? Isolated by whom? The Korean missile crisis is primarily between North Korea, South Korea and USA, not China. China opposes N. Korea missile testing, but that does not mean China is threatened by it. North Korea does not threaten any Chinese cities so what threat are you talking about, that you want China to stop?
    1
  18084. Matt Hoehn How is North Korea a threat to China? Which Chinese cities are under threat by N. Korea missiles? N. Korea practically relies on trade with China to survive so why would China consider N. Korea a threat then? You said previously that China would be isolated for aiding the regime, but China has always been trading with N. Korea all along, and when was China ever isolated by other nations for doing so?
    1
  18085. Matt Hoehn If North Korea launches a nuke even against any country, then N. Korea will be wiped out as countries turn against it (USA, South Korea, Japan, even China) so why do you think N. Korea will actually launch a nuke at all, which will guarantee its own annihilation? You said previously that China would be isolated for aiding the regime, but China has been trading with N. Korea without being isolated by anyone. Even if China decides to go against the sanctions, would countries in the world cut off trade relations with China, their number one biggest trade partner? Their economies rely on China too much to cut off trade with China completely. Why do you insist China will be isolated then?
    1
  18086. Matt Hoehn If its "could have been" then how is North Korea missile a threat to China at all? So far, N. Korea has not launched any nukes, and its unlikely to ever do so (as it will be annihilated by countries including China) so do you really believe N. Korea's blustering? How do you know that these toughest round of sanctions will would label anyone supporting the regime with similar sanctions? Like I keep saying, China has been supporting N. Korea for many years already, yet other countries still continue to do business with China, despite China aiding N. Korea. So why do you keep insisting that China will become isolated because of N. Korea, when there hasn't been any proof of that so far? Even if China decides not to follow the latest sanctions, what makes you think other countries will completely cut off trade with China, given that China is biggest trading partner in many of these countries? Will they risk their own economies for the sake of China not upholding sanctions? Like I said early, the China followed the UN sanctions because China wanted to punish North Korean missile testing during the 2017 BRICS summit held in Xiamen, China, which China perceives as North Korean defiance against China. The UN sanctions were agreed upon by UN, not USA alone, so what has Trump got to do with this then, except taking credit for China's efforts?
    1
  18087. Matt Hoehn Like I keep saying, the sanctions were agreed upon by the United Nations members, not just United States alone. Just because Trump gave the speech, means that he can claim all the credit for the UN sanctions? Remember that China is UN security council member and can could always veto this UN decision if we choose to. China has done much better than Trump when it comes to getting North Korea to denuclearize. Beijing managed to extract word of Pyongyang's denuclearization from this meeting, compared to Trump's diplomacy by constantly calling Kim "rocket man" all the time. If Trump wants to claim all the credit for China's efforts, then why don't Kim just visit Washington directly for talks, rather than coming to Beijing? I mean, you talk about N. Korea being a threat to China and China supposedly being isolated by other countries for aiding N. Korea, but where is actual evidence for your claims?
    1
  18088. +Kevin Bacon President Xi Jinping is willing to tackle the mountain of corruption in the Communist party (which other previous Chinese leaders dared not touch) so we have anti-corruption crackdowns of our own.
    1
  18089. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了
    1
  18090. ​ @kyosokutai "Taiwan sits as living proof that democracy would probably make China truly prosper." Taiwan's economic success was the result of authoritarian, single-party Kuomintang rule for more than half its life. For decades, the KMT rule Taiwan with an iron fist and Chiang Kai-shek was a dictator, jailing or executing rivals and political dissenters in a period known as White Terror (Taiwan). The KMT also imposed martial law in Taiwan for 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Yet Taiwan's economy flourished under single-party KMT rule, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle. Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7% between 1952–1982, and at 6.9% between 1983–1986. Taiwan's GDP grew by 360% between 1965–1986. It's only when democracy was introduced to Taiwan in the late 1990s that Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. So it was authoritarian rule that made Taiwan one of the Four Asian Tigers/Dragons, not Western-style democracy.
    1
  18091. ​ @kyosokutai "Shenzhou. Taiwan does have a democracy and overall, are a lot more successful than the mainland is." A lot more successful? Mainland China has the world's 2nd largest economy (in fact, the largest economy if measured by GDP PPP), whereas Taiwan island's economy is ranked 22nd in the world. Mainland China is home to the world's largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Taiwan's hi-speed rail (and even Japan's Shinkansen) in terms of track length. Mainland China is the world's largest maker of electric vehicles, with Chinese company BYD surpassing even Elon Musk's Tesla in terms of sales (let alone Taiwan's car industry). Or take smartphones for example, and mainland China has produced many successful smartphone brands like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, etc. Top 10 Mobile Brands in the World (by Global Brands) 1. Samsung (South Korean) 2. Apple (American) 3. Huawei (Chinese) 4. Xiaomi (Chinese) 5. Oppo (Chinese) 6. Vivo (Chinese) 7. Motorola (Formerly American, bought over by Chinese) 8. Lenovo (Chinese) 9. LG (South Korean) 10. Nokia (Finnish) ... Source: Global Brands: Top 10 Mobile Brands in the World But where are all the successful smartphone companies from Taiwan island? Yet you're saying Taiwan is a lot more successful than the mainland is? Also, in the field of Artificial Intelligence, mainland China has Deepseek to compete with America's OpenAI. What has Taiwan got?
    1
  18092. ​ @kyosokutai "Shenzhou. Taiwan does have a democracy and overall, are a lot more successful than the mainland is." A lot more successful? Mainland China has the world's 2nd largest economy (in fact, the largest economy if measured by GDP PPP), whereas Taiwan island's economy is ranked 22nd in the world. Mainland China is home to the world's largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Taiwan's hi-speed rail (and even Japan's Shinkansen) in terms of track length. Mainland China is the world's largest maker of electric vehicles, with Chinese company BYD surpassing even Elon Musk's Tesla in terms of sales (let alone Taiwan's car industry). Or take smartphones for example, and mainland China has produced many successful smartphone brands like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, etc. Top 10 Mobile Brands in the World (by Global Brands) 1. Samsung (South Korean) 2. Apple (American) 3. Huawei (Chinese) 4. Xiaomi (Chinese) 5. Oppo (Chinese) 6. Vivo (Chinese) 7. Motorola (Formerly American, bought over by Chinese) 8. Lenovo (Chinese) 9. LG (South Korean) 10. Nokia (Finnish) ... Source: Global Brands: Top 10 Mobile Brands in the World But where are all the successful smartphone companies from Taiwan island? Yet you're saying Taiwan is a lot more successful than the mainland is? Also, in the field of Artificial Intelligence, mainland China has Deepseek to compete with America's OpenAI. What has Taiwan got?
    1
  18093. ​ @kyosokutai "Shenzhou. Taiwan does have a democracy and overall, are a lot more successful than the mainland is." A lot more successful? Mainland China has the world's 2nd largest economy (in fact, the largest economy if measured by GDP PPP), whereas Taiwan island's economy is ranked 22nd in the world. Mainland China is home to the world's largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Taiwan's hi-speed rail (and even Japan's Shinkansen) in terms of track length. Mainland China is the world's largest maker of electric vehicles, with Chinese company BYD surpassing even Elon Musk's Tesla in terms of sales (let alone Taiwan's car industry). Or take smartphones for example, and mainland China has produced many successful smartphone brands like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, etc. Top 10 Mobile Brands in the World (by Global Brands) 1. Samsung (South Korean) 2. Apple (American) 3. Huawei (Chinese) 4. Xiaomi (Chinese) 5. Oppo (Chinese) 6. Vivo (Chinese) 7. Motorola (Formerly American, bought over by Chinese) 8. Lenovo (Chinese) 9. LG (South Korean) 10. Nokia (Finnish) ... Source: Global Brands: Top 10 Mobile Brands in the World But where are all the successful smartphone companies from Taiwan island? Yet you're saying Taiwan is a lot more successful than the mainland is?
    1
  18094. ​ @kyosokutai A lot more successful? Mainland China has the world's 2nd largest economy (in fact, the largest economy if measured by GDP PPP), whereas Taiwan island's economy is ranked 22nd in the world. Mainland China is home to the world's largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Taiwan's hi-speed rail (and even Japan's Shinkansen) in terms of track length. Mainland China is the world's largest maker of electric vehicles, with Chinese company BYD surpassing even Elon Musk's Tesla in terms of sales (let alone Taiwan's car industry). Or take smartphones for example, and mainland China has produced many successful smartphone brands like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, etc. Top 10 Mobile Brands in the World (by Global Brands) 1. Samsung (South Korean) 2. Apple (American) 3. Huawei (Chinese) 4. Xiaomi (Chinese) 5. Oppo (Chinese) 6. Vivo (Chinese) 7. Motorola (Formerly American, bought over by Chinese) 8. Lenovo (Chinese) 9. LG (South Korean) 10. Nokia (Finnish) ... Source: Global Brands: Top 10 Mobile Brands in the World But where are all the successful smartphone companies from Taiwan island? Yet you're saying Taiwan is a lot more successful than the mainland is?
    1
  18095. China also has anti-ship ballistic missiles, like the DF-21 "Carrier Killer" which can be launched from the safety of the land, to target a ship in the ocean. Just search China's "Carrier Killer" missiles to see what I mean.
    1
  18096. If you want to consider thousands of strategic targets in India, then why even bother to label them as "strategic" targets at all? "Strategic target" implies that out of a huge number, you pick a smaller and manageable number of targets and attack them tactically for maximum benefit, isn't it? In my opinion, strategic targets would be important cites like supply lines, fuel depots, munitions dumps, etc, not monuments like the Taj Mahal. Why does China need to completely destroy the target? What does that achieve? As long as the strategic site has been crippled enough to be unable to support Indian troops or contribute to Indian war machine, then the missiles have achieved their objective. Why focus on destroying a single target, when the main objective is to win the war? In actual warfare, the PLA won't just use MIRV capable missiles alone. An attack could possibly be combined with stealth fighter runs (by Chengdu J-20s for example) or it could be used to soften up the target before a ground attack by Type-99 tanks and infantry. Afterall, the MIRV capabilities of the DF-21 is just one of the many military options that the PLA can choose to deploy during war that's all. Just like China's anti-satellite missiles can always be deployed to take out Indian military satellites in orbit, to put Indian Navy ships and ground troops at a disadvantage without satellite support from above. All these technological implements are designed to give China an edge over India during such a war scenario. As for China's "Carrier Killer" DF-21D, there are ways of locating Indian ships in Indian Ocean, such as using Over-the-Horizon Radars. Chinese military satellites in space may be able to spot the ships, or PLAN submarines in the Indian Ocean could reveal the ships locations to the missile launchers on land.
    1
  18097. If India mistook China's long range ballistic missile as nuclear attack, and launched a full scale nuclear retaliation, then it would be India's grave mistake to have launched a preemptive nuclear attack on China without first having been attacked by nuclear weapons from China. It would be India's fault for not first confirming that the attacks weren't made using nuclear weapons. As far as I know, Indian ATAGS are not yet in full operation. it was started in 2013 by DRDO to replace older guns in service, and took 4 years of development, yet ATAGS are still not operational in Indian Army, even in 2018. As for China, the PLA conducted live-fire exercises in Tibet using mobile artillery, howitzers, multi-launch systems, mortars, etc. according to the following video. Video:Chinese Army carries out military exercise on Tibet plateau youtube.com/watch?v=a8bNgIckr10 The Chengdu J-20 was inducted into PLA Airforce operational service in March 2017, and Chinese sources indicate about 30-40 of the fighters have been built. But of course, any military won't just give away the actual numbers of its military aircraft just like that. If you want to claim the DF-21D "Carrier Killer" is unproven, then why you just claim PAD anti ballastic missile can be modified for anti-satellite role just like that? Has your supposed Indian "anti-satellite" missile even been tested at all, like China's anti-satellite missile? Otherwise, how can you just claim India can modify its missile to be anti-satellite, without actual tests? China's testing of DF-21 has been observed and noted by military agencies of Russia and USA, so isn't there reason to believe this weapon poses a significant threat? OTH is just one of China's possibility to acquire targets, and China can always use submarines to help pinpoint the actual location of ships in Indian Ocean. PLA Navy also deployed many underwater sea drones (across South China Sea) so why can't these drones be deployed in Indian Ocean too? Speaking of drones, in mountainous combat scenario, the PLA can deploy aerial units like our very own combat UAVs, like the CaiHong-5, which has been compared to to USA's Reaper combat drone. During testing, the drone flew for about 30 hours, providing surveillance and carried missiles to engage targets, requiring little or no ground support. But India recently crashed its own Israeli-made drone in 2017 after violating Chinese airspace.
    1
  18098. How is it a mistake on China's part, if India is the one retaliating with full scale nuclear attack? If India mistook China's long range ballistic missile as a nuclear attack, and retaliated with nukes of their own, then straightaway, India is the one preemptively launching nuclear attack on China. If other artillery systems are under acquisition by India, that means its not available for military deployment yet isn't it? And what happens if during actual wartime, the Indian army is cut off from acquiring this equipment? In China's case, we can always make more tanks, fighters, artillery guns, ammunition, drones, etc ourselves to replace losses during wartime. Chinese submarines are still present in Indian Ocean, despite all those difficulties you claim they will encounter. If you think countries won't allow Chinese submarines movement for combat role, then likewise they won't allow Indian warships movement for combat role as well isn't it? You are just speculating about PAD being Indian ASAT, then that means there is no guarantee that India's ASAT will be successful. Also, you claim India and USA will share satellites, but what makes you so sure? Is there an actual written agreement showing that USA will share its sensitive military satellite data with India? As for your sources about J-20 production, how do you know the actual numbers of China's Chengdu J-20, unless you are the actual PLA Airforce general yourself? And what makes you think J-20 are incapable of flying over the Himalayas? The J-20 stealth fighter has been spotted at Daocheng Yading in Tibet, the highest civilian airport in the world after all. Although the CH-5 has not entered service yet, earlier versions like the CH-4 are active and have been exported to Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Iraq. CH-4 is capable of firing air-to-ground missile from altitude of 5,000 meters, therefore the aircraft can stay outside of effective range of most anti-aircraft guns. It also allow CH-4 to be able to fire from a position that provides wider viewing area. Chinese submarines remain the best option for scouting out Indian warships to be targeted by DF-21. China has also been developing a new submarine-launched anti-ship cruise missile, with range of about 290 km, which would put Chinese submarines at a safe distance from most anti-submarine warfare systems. Source:China Unveils New Submarine-Launched Anti-Ship Cruise Missile thediplomat.com/2016/04/china-unveils-new-submarine-launched-anti-ship-cruise-missile/ If you claim DF-21 has not been tested against a moving target, then I can also say India' PAD being modified to become ASAT weapon has not been tested at all too. Would you prefer Indian warships to be the DF-21D's first target? The DF-21 has undergone extensive testing outside of any combat situation to get to where it is today, wheres India's ASAT capabilities have not progressed at all.
    1
  18099. If India mistook China's DF-41 for a nuclear attack, then again, it is India's grave mistake, not China. Look at North Korea has been testing missiles (some of them flying over Japanese mainland) but nobody every mistook that as a nuclear attack and retaliate with full scale nuclear assault on N. Korea. China has demonstrated anti-satellite capabilities in 2007, and India has not yet, so why do you think China won't take out Indian Army satellites in space? If you are quoting the militarization of space treaty, then the treaty does not prohibit the placement of conventional weapons in orbit and thus some highly destructive attack strategies such as kinetic bombardment are still potentially allowable. If its a real war between China and India, I see no reason why China is not allowed to destroy Indian military satellites in space. Its impossible to know the exact figure of how many Chengdu J-20 are present in PLA Airforce, unless you are the PLA General himself. Also, J-20 is not just been conceived in a single year, it has already been in the works for many years, and since it is being prep to enter actual service, it could be possible that multiple aircraft were in production years before the J-20 being deployed into active service. Who knows except for the commander of PLA? Also, wasn't a J-20 spotted in Tibetan airport, indicating that the aircraft is at least capable of flying over Tibet to the Himalayas? China has advanced artillery of our own. China's PLZ-05 self propelled howitzer ranks among the Top 10 Howitzers in the world, together with PLZ-52 (which is export version). China's Multi Launch Rocket Systems (MLRS) are also consistently among the world's Top 10, such as SR-5, AR-3 and WS-2D, as shown in the following videos. In my personal opinion, I would say China's level of artillery support is possibly more advanced than India's. Video:Top 10 Self Propelled Howitzer in the World 2017 youtube.com/watch?v=AQBcIRwg2fg Video:Top 10 MLRS In The World 2017 youtube.com/watch?v=66ETMGNrh98 You appear to underestimate the stealth capabilities of Chinese submarines, which have been moving undetected and spreading out all over the world's seas and oceans. Back in 2007, a Chinese submarine surfaced while in a middle of a US Navy exercise, involving the US carrier, USS Kitty Hawk. Apparently, the Chinese submarine was undetected, and managed to surface within torpedo range of the aircraft carrier. But if Chinese submarines have anti-ship cruise missiles like shown in my previous source, then there will be no need to come so close to the aircraft carrier before opening fire.
    1
  18100. +Kunal Varshney North Korean missiles have flown over Japanese airspace before, but it has not been retaliated with full scale nuclear attack, so why do you still claim China's long range ballistic missile with be mistaken for nuclear attack by India? I mean, isn't this your own speculation on India's part? How can you prove India will mistake China's long range missile launch as nuclear attack and retaliate with nukes of its own? If China is at war with India, why would China not consider deploying anti satellite missiles? The benefit to China are many, and under the militarization of space, nuclear weapons are prohibited, but not conventional weapons. The PLA Airforce would not have pressed J-20 into service, if there isn't any significant numbers of it to be fielded during actual war. Otherwise, why press the J-20 into service if it isn't ready for actual deployment yet? The J-20 is also capable of landing on Tibetan airport, so why do you claim that it can't fly over Himalayas? So if you claim Chinese submarines need permission to pass through South East Asia straits, then won't Indian warships need permission to be there as well? And why do you think there is only one route through to Indian ocean? Brahmos missile is unable to target submerged submarines, so how much of a threat is it at all to Chinese submarines? Our subs can also be equipped with anti ship cruise missiles that can be launched while being safely out of range of many anti-submarine weapons. The thing about artillery, armor and other military hardware is that during wartime, China can always make more tanks, howitzers, fighters, drones, ammunition and equipment to replace losses. But India has to import weapons and ammunition from foreign countries like USA and Russia. If these countries suddenly decide to raise prices of their wares, India still has no choice but to buy their weapons from them.
    1
  18101. MickeyG Shooting down satellites in space is exceedingly difficult yes, which is why only three countries have achieved it thus far. But it is not altogether impossible, as demonstrated by China, Soviet Union and USA. Whether Indian Army relies on it or not, taking out Indian military satellites in space will deny them strategic satellite surveillance from the ground. During war, China will make use of such options if the benefits outweigh the costs. As for taking out Indian carriers, it offers strategic value in numerous ways. It boosts Chinese morale, while lowering India's, it shows that China's anti ship missile are effective, but if it fails, then it provides valuable data for Chinese military to improve on its design. Like the other guy said, the DF-21d has never been tested on a moving target, so won't this be an excellent opportunity to test it? If the DF-21 really lives up to its name, then it will also send a strong signal to other countries with aircraft carriers of their own, like USA, telling them that China is capable of targeting their aircraft carriers. Even if Indian aircraft carriers keep away from the shores, I have shown that Chinese submarines have submarine launched anti ship cruise missiles that could pose a threat to US carriers. Now instead of Taj Mahal, you are talking about Mumbai? Why not aim for real strategic targets like supply lines, fuel depots and ammunition dumps instead? Just like why do you bother calling it strategic sites when you considered thousands of sites earlier? Exactly how is it being strategic when you are considering thousands of sites as tactical targets?
    1
  18102. +Kunal Varshney Why is comparing NK with case of China laughable? Didn't Akin Khoo mentioned earlier that NK is technically still at war with the Allies? If India mistook China's long range ballistic missile as a nuclear attack, and retaliates with full scale nuclear assault, then it would be Indian's grave mistake to have attacked a country with nukes, without being attacked with it first, isn't it? I mean, its India's own fault for not noticing that it wasn't a nuclear assault, isn't it? About Chengdu J-20, you mentioned earlier that "producing 30 fighters in a 1st year is impossible...china have not yet set enough facilities for that...wait i will quote you articles regarding that..." and it has been sometime, yet you still haven't quoted me articles regarding that. Yet you now want me to provide source on J-20, when you haven't quoted me sources like you said you would? If you claim J-20 can't fly over Himalayas, then why was the J-20 photographed at Daocheng Yading airport in Tibet, which is the world's highest altitude civilian airport then? I am talking about Indian warships in the straits, not in South China Sea. They also will need permission from those countries if they want to be there to intercept Chinese submarines, isn't it? Why you think Chinese submarines (which are stealthily submerged) will need permission, when it is the clearly visible Indian warships located in the straits that will attract attention here? You think this video alone is enough to justify all entry routes? There is the 3rd option which longer and require more supplies, but China also has a submarine base in Djibouti to resupply Chinese submarines making the long trip. There are even plans to build another submarine base near Gwadar Port in Pakistan too. India may be able to import advanced weaponry from Russia and USA, but they will be subject to market prices, and the deliveries may take time to reach India. Also, India is unable to produce important components of some of its heavier military equipment. And the Indian ASAT capabilities have not been realized yet so far. And how can you prove that USA will be willing to share its sensitive military satellite data with India? Is there a written agreement stating that USA is willing to share satellite data with Indian military?
    1
  18103. +Kunal Varshney North Korea launched a missile directly at Japanese mainland, and you still want to ask what China will do if India launches Agni V towards China? Did North Korea get retaliated by full scale nuclear weapons? No it didn't, so why assume China will react like India and retaliate with full scale nuclear weapon? Why you assume India will retaliate with full scale nuclear weapon then? This point is brought up by you, so why don't you prove it yourself first that India will retaliate with nukes? The engine problems have largely been solved with the development of WS-15 engines, and the J-20 is still able to climb to Tibetan airport. As for production Here is a Chinese news article indicating that 15 new models have emerged. The sensitive nature of stealthfighters means that the PLA will not tell the public how many of such aircraft are at the PLA Airforce disposal. Source:mil.news.sina.com.cn/jssd/2017-06-14/doc-ifyfzfyz3941865.shtml India owns the water outside the strait? How exactly? You still need permission from those South East Asia countries if you want Indian warships to pass close to their waters. The Nicobar and Andaman Islands are wide, and Chinese subs have greater chance of sneaking through. Also, I did mention that China has submarine base located in Djibouti, so how many more are hidden throughout the oceans to resupply submarines passing through to the Indian Ocean? Its your opinion that you believe in your submarine detection capabilities. Then I should also be able to believe in the stealthiness of Chinese submarines, since they have been demonstrated to be able to surface in the middle of US Navy exercise (seemingly undetected) and within torpedo range of the USS Kitty Hawk aircraft carrier. You mean you can just discount a war of attrition between India and China and claim that it is out of this debate? Besides basic fighting equipment and advanced weaponry, China will most definitely deploy aerial units in mountainous combat scenario, such as our combat UAVs like CaiHong-3 and Caihong-4 (perhaps CaiHong-5 as well). These UAVs are unmanned, and even if destroyed there is no lost of Chinese lives in their destruction, so PLA soldiers can continue to enjoy our numerical advantage in the battle field. About ASAT, as far as I know, US and India did not sign any agreement regarding sharing satellite intelligence. Even if India agrees, will USA agree to share its satellite information with India, since India is also Russian ally as well? China not only has short range missiles, but missiles like DF-21 can also be deployed for land use. The DF-21 flies high above the stratosphere and has guidance system to help avoid anti-missile defenses and adjust its course. During reentry, the DF-21 is capable of achieving hypersonic speeds of up to Mach 10 or 10 times the speed of sound, in order to hit a target. Video:China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile youtube.com/watch?v=p-cEunmqXM8
    1
  18104. Who is the one keep repeating that point India will retaliate with nukes if China uses long range missile, when I have shown that despite North Korea launching missile over Japan islands, no nuclear retaliation was taken against it?
    1
  18105. Kunal Varshney You ask others to go ask experts, but are you even an expert yourself? Then how can you claim India will retaliate with full blown nuclear weapons, just because China launch long range missile? The North Korea is a recognized nuclear state, so what makes you think they are incapable of deploying nuclear warheads? NK is also still technically at war with South Korea and USA because no peace treaty has been signed. What makes you think Japan and NK don't have any previous history of war? During WW1 and WW2 period, Korea was under Japanese occupation for 35 years yet you still claim they have have no previous history of war? When did I "start claiming since japan didnt intercept NK missiles why india will try to intercept chinese missile" I never said anything about India trying to intercept Chinese missiles or not, all I am saying is whether India will retaliate with full blown nukes if China launches long range missile. You asked me earlier that "if india launches agni 5 towards china..will china assume it to be nuclear armed or conventionally armed" and I answered it by saying NK was not retaliated by nukes, even after launching a long range missile at Japan. I mean, this whole point is brought up by you, isn't it? So why don't you prove it yourself first that India will retaliate with nukes? I have already described a real scenario in which a long range missile launched into foreign airspace, did not trigger a nuclear retaliation. The burden of proof lies on you here to prove India will retaliate with nukes.
    1
  18106. Ashutosh Kumar Why are you certain that long range missiles won't be used? Even North Korea clearly launched a long range missile reaching Japanese islands, so what makes you think China won't do the same? Even if no warheads are deployed, launching long range missile will help test its range and its ability to reach targets isn't it? I have demonstrated that China has plenty of other assets besides ICBM. China has DF-21D "Carrier Killer" which can be used to target warships at sea, from the safety of the land. If it does manage to sink a carrier, it will be a tremendous morale boost for PLA, (and lower Indian morale) and it will also send a message to US carriers that China's DF-21D works. Even if it fails, it will provide valuable data for us to improve our missile capabilities. China also has numerous submarines that can help spot and paint targets for DF-21 deployment. Chinese submarines also can be equipped with submarine-launched anti-ship cruise missile, possibly posing a danger to US carrier strike groups, while putting Chinese submarines at a safe distance from most anti-submarine warfare systems. In mountainous combat scenario, China can deploy aerial units like our very own domestically made combat UAVs, such as Caihong-3, Caihong-4 and possibly even Caihong-5. The drones will provide valuable reconnaissance and are slightly more difficult to detect on radar, while being capable of equipping and firing air-to-ground missiles to engage targets. Even if they are destroyed, no PLA soldiers lives are lost, and it frees up the PLA soldiers to perform other urgent tasks elsewhere. Did I already mention that China has anti-satellite capabilities, and can theoretically take out Indian military satellites in space to put Indian ground troops at disadvantage without satellite comms and coordination? There is a possibility of a draw yes, but even in this simulation, China still has a marginal victory, due to many factors that I have provided recently. Even if its a draw, it will boost PLA's combat experience as well as act as a testing bed for all the new technologies. But in my opinion it is unlikely to be draw, and even the simulation agrees that China will have acquired some new territory.
    1
  18107. Nato was formed in response to Soviet Union's military might. After the dissolution of the USSR in 1990, Nato no longer serves any interest (except the US's).
    1
  18108.  @alive_twicedead_once34  You asked: "Are you aware of the tariffs and other trade restrictions on the U.S. by other countries?" The U.S is ranked the most protectionist country in the world, having taken over 800 protectionist measures since 2008 according to Global Trade Alert. EU countries have taken over 300 protectionist measures, whereas China's is in 200-300 range in comparison. And mind you, these protectionism measures by the US have long been taken before Trump first came to power in 2016.
    1
  18109.  @johnmcook1  You said: "Australia has significantly ramped up its production of rare earth minerals in recent years... Australia has become a key player in this sector as well..." Top Countries by Rare Earth Metal Production (Updated 2024) 1. China (240,000 metric tons) 2. United States (43,000 metric tons 3. Myanmar (38,000 metric tons) 4. Australia (18,000 metric tons) ... Source: Nasdaq In fact, Australia represents just 5% of the world's rare earth metals production.
    1
  18110. Cryptocurrency is basically just speculation on literally nothing. They have been used as ransom money for hackers (because it's untraceable) and by unsavory organisations to launder money. Bitcoin mining is also a requires huge drain on power that could have been used for other more productive ventures rather than mining cryptocurrencies.
    1
  18111. Depends on which "virus" you're referring to. I'm certain that masks doesn't protect against HIV.
    1
  18112.  @srouji6  China's export ban on rare earths will drive up the prices of rare earth globally, until the US chipmakers find it far too expensive to use rare earths in their chips, so they'll have to move to China if they want access to plentiful and affordable rare metals in China for their chips. These chipmakers run on profit after all, and where else to maximise profits except by coming to China?
    1
  18113.  @srouji6  And I clearly added that US chipmakers run on profit after all. Once China withhold rare earths stocks, the price of rare earths will increase until it becomes too expensive for US chipmakers to operate with US rare earths. Hence they'll need to come to China in order to access the rare earths needed for their chips.
    1
  18114.  @srouji6  Because American companies are clearly loyal to money, not country. Whereas Chinese companies are loyal to country, not money.
    1
  18115.  @srouji6  Pollution is a problem in China yes, because of China's reliance on coals, so China is slowly making the switch to renewable energy instead. For example, China built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam, in order to supply China with endless source of green energy to fuel our growth. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtube.com/watch?v=b8cCsUBYSkw But of course, the switch to renewable energy is not instantaneous and it will take China some time. On the contrary, I heard President Donald Trump is promising to bring coal plants back to America and he even withdrew USA from the 2017 Paris Accord, no longer restricting US CO2 emissions.
    1
  18116.  @learnfaster164  US servicemen stationed in Okinawa raped a local woman there and Japanese government can't do anything about US military bases in Okinawa. Even South Korea prostitutes are servicing US personnel, because S. Korea needs those US bases to defend against North Korea. Source: Wikipedia: Prostitutes in South Korea for the U.S. military wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitutes_in_South_Korea_for_the_U.S._military
    1
  18117. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The Chia 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  18118. ​ @ericcartmann  Chinese also help buy up 1.2 trillion dollars ($1,200,000,000,000) worth of US debt, so it can also be said that China is helping to save the US economy by buying off debt.
    1
  18119.  @crusoerob8550  China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  18120. The law of energy conversion is not as simple as you make it out to be.
    1
  18121.  @David-og7di  "神州 Shenzhou ok...thanks for the reply. In my country we don't need a government to advise us on what or how to think." NZ has a small, educated population, and that's why liberal democracy can flourish. Whereas take India (world's largest democracy) for example and why do they think allowing ordinary people to participate in political-decision making is a good idea? Ordinary people are fickle, and they make poor voters for several reasons: -Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (i.e they may not turn up to vote, or they submit blank votes) -Ordinary people may base their vote on emotions, not logic (i.e majority of British voted for Brexit, because they don't like immigrants) -Ordinary people are susceptible to foreign influence (i.e Russian influencing U.S 2016 election of Trump, through various fake social media accounts) -Ordinary people may lack political awareness of their country's situation in order to make informed decisions regarding the country's future. ... There's a host of other problems associated with liberal democracy, magnified further by huge population sizes (as in India). China's answer is to allow those who know how to govern the country to govern the country, and look at how far China has come under our own political system. Not all countries need to adopt Western democracy to be successful, and China is living proof of this.
    1
  18122.  @David-og7di  "神州 Shenzhou Maybe that is true in the US....bipartisan politics are very flawed but there are many more Western countries whose people laugh very hard when an attempt is made to coerce or persuade us towards something we find antipathic." That may be so in the U.S. But many Western countries (i.e UK, Canada, Australia, etc) and some Asian countries including Japan, are literally influenced by the U.S, and tend to side with the U.S over China issues. If you claim that people in Western countries "laugh very hard" when an attempt is made to coerce or persuade them, then why is it seemingly no Western country is willing to go against the U.S.A? If your country can truly laugh very hard in the face of U.S pressure, and take the opposite decision of what the U.S expects you to do, then your country certain isn't a U.S pawn. Otherwise, your country is a U.S pawn.
    1
  18123.  @David-og7di  "..if a television advertisement stated that brushing your teeth with The Great Wall Toothbrush was a patriotic act and that you should do that; we would be suspicious as patriotism has zero to do with dental care." I don't understand the point of your advertisement. If brushing with this "Great Wall Toothbrush" was a patriotic act (as I assume "Great Wall Toothbrush" is a Chinese brand) then you are clearly supporting local Chinese brands by buying this toothbrush. It's the same as how many Americans think buying Apple iPhone is a patriotic act since they are buying from American company. It's the same with Chinese people who buy Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, or other Chinese smartphone brands, because its supporting our local Chinese companies.
    1
  18124.  @storage4539  "We should give more leeway to fake news media like BBC, DW, NHK and France 24 in our motherland for them to spread sloppy news reporting." There's a huge risk of this backfiring, and people in China getting hoodwinked by foreign media (similar to what happened in HK riots) and starting conflicts on our own soil. This doesn't sound like a good idea, since it invites unnecessary risk, just for extremely minimal gain. I doubt Western audiences will somehow "trust" Chinese media more, just because we have foreign media in China. On the other hand, foreign media will gain a foothold in China in order to convince more people to their cause. "Then our party's media can easily debunk their lies not just in front of our countrymen but the world!" Aren't channels like CGTN already debunking Western media on YouTube? Those foreign news don't necessarily have to broadcast in China in order to be debunked, Chinese media can debunk them on Western media.
    1
  18125.  @David-og7di  You said: "I have hosted many Chinese home stays through university. They ALL applied for residency and had families etc. When I asked them why they did not wish to return to China, all said there were too many people, jobs of quality were hard to get, living spaces were small." China is the country with the world's largest population (at estimated 1.4 billion people). Obviously with such a huge student population, there's going to be fierce competition for top schools and universities, as well as for jobs when our students graduate. Some students are unable to qualify for local university so if parents have money, they send them abroad to study and get job overseas. But for your countries, this is perceived as increased competition from Chinese international students, and also for your local jobs once the Chinese students graduate, and this might results in anti-China sentiment chasing away Chinese graduates and encouraging them to return, bringing with them their knowledge to China. Australia for one, has a strong anti-China sentiment among their citizens towards Chinese immigrants, but I'm not sure about the case in NZ.
    1
  18126.  @rr7369  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, doesn't it sound like the USA is a threat to global peace and stability here?
    1
  18127.  @dinerocurioso  It makes no sense for Russian forces to painstaking avoid civilian casualties, only to sabotage their own efforts with Bucha. Also, Russian forces had weeks to "cover up evidence" and "bury the bodies", instead of stupidly leaving the bodies strewn haphazardly all over the place, in plain sight for the Ukrainian forces to "discover".
    1
  18128. China has settled boundary dispute approximately of 20,000 km with 12 countries out of the 22,000 km and is yet to settle about 2,000 km of boundary involving India and Bhutan. -In 1961, Nepal and China signed border agreement. -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1991, USSR and China signed Sino-Soviet border agreement. -In 1992, Laos and China signed border agreement. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border agreement. Only India and Bhutan refuse to sign border treaty with China. And its not from a lack of trying, China has 21 talks with Bhutan and 19 talks with India but still fail to settle our countries borders.
    1
  18129. +Jonathan Sterling North Korea already faces sanctions from the rest of the world, so what makes you think China's sanctions will have any further effect at all? The government already tried suspending coal imports to N. Korea and it only made Kim angrier, not more open towards nuclear disarmament.
    1
  18130. +Jonathan Sterling Chinese government always opposed North Korean missile tests and promotes peace and tranquility in the Korean peninsula. Just recently when China hosted the BRICS summit in Xiamen, N. Korea responded by testing a new hydrogen bomb. This shows that the government has no control over N. Korea's missile tests otherwise, why launch missiles when the important leaders of BRICS countries are meeting in China?
    1
  18131. +Jonathan Sterling It should be noted that China does not have any military bases located in North Korea at all, whereas USA maintain 28,500 American soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines in military bases in South Korea. So exactly how is China controlling North Korea here when we don't even maintain any military presence in North Korea? North Korea is its own sovereign country and its provocative actions are its own.
    1
  18132.  @jimgraham6722  About China's president for life, China has many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans to map out China's future in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. Whereas in the United States, the U.S Presidents can only plan short-term, because they have to step down after 4-8 years, and can't make long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more.
    1
  18133. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18134. Even the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18135. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18136.  @CaptainKremmen  "China has the majority of the world's coal-fired power plants." China is also the world's largest producer of renewable energy, be it solar, wind or hydroelectric. Over the years, China's electric grid may switch from fossil fuel to renewable energy.
    1
  18137. China has ambitious long-term projects, like 10-20 year plans to be largest economy in 2020, superpower by 2030, etc. These plans can't be achieved if the leader suddenly steps down after his term, and the next leader suddenly abolishes the plans, such as ongoing Belt and Road Initiative. For example, when Trump came to power, he abolished Obama's Trans Pacific Partnership, which been in the making for 8 years, simply because Trump don't like Obama (Obama humiliated Trump with his birth certificate) and all those taxpayers money invested in TPP suddenly went down the drain. In my opinion, China should avoid such similar scenario in our policies.
    1
  18138. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18139. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18140. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18141. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18142. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  18143.  @ABCXYZ-jk8me  轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  18144.  @zetristan4525  How am I adamant not to understand meaning? Corruption is a universal phenomena and governments all over the world suffer from it to a certain extent. But under President Xi Jinping, there is a massive crackdown on corruption in the communist party. The anti-corruption campaign has implicated over 120 high ranking officials (including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders). As of 2023, approximately 2.3 million government officials have been prosecuted. ... Source: Wikipedia: Anti-corruption campaign under Xi Jinping
    1
  18145.  @zetristan4525  How am I adamant not to understand meaning? Regarding corruption, it's is a universal phenomena and governments all over the world suffer from it to a certain extent. But under President Xi Jinping, there is a massive crackdown on corruption in the communist party. As of 2023, approximately 2.3 million government officials have been prosecuted in Xi's anti-corruption campaign.
    1
  18146. ​ @zetristan4525  You can criticize the CPC but can't I defend it? I mean, China was previously a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and China has transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy (largest by GDP PPP) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China.
    1
  18147.  @starrdust3625  If your government don't control religion, then religion will start to control your government. China is atheist by nature and of course churches in China follow Chinese laws while in China. Look at history, and the Christian churches always held power over the kings in the various kingdoms, so China is not letting Christianity dictate the government, instead it is the government that dictates Christianity while in China
    1
  18148.  @garxgar  It's our country, our laws. If you want to remained unregistered Christian in China, then the government will crackdown on those "underground" churches unless they register themselves properly. I'm sure Islamic countries also crackdown on Christians and promotes Islam in their country. Their county, their laws, our country, our laws. As an atheist Chinese citizen, I feel safer knowing that the government enforces proper registration of Christians and Muslims in our country, and does not allow their "beliefs" to dictate China. If you don't like it, you are always welcome to leave China and migrate to other countries. Once again, our countries, our laws.
    1
  18149. That must be what's called a "Freudian slip"
    1
  18150. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18151. The uploader's mindset is that children should grow up to become working adults to take care of their parents. China has a shortage of births, therefore a shortage of people to take care of the elderly. But what if advanced technology makes up for the shortfall in manpower to support an aging population? What if artificially intelligent robotic caregivers become available in the future, to supplant the lack of people needed to support the elderly?
    1
  18152. +Tina Some "smart" houses already have robots that take care of the house (clean the floor, do laundry, control the television, the lights, the radio, the air-conditioner etc) so it isn't hard to imagine applying the same process to taking care of the elderly.
    1
  18153. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18154. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18155. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18156. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18157. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  18158. Pentagon says $6.5 trillion dollars missing from US department of defense and unaccounted for after an audit Source: $6.5 trillion missing from Defense Department wnd.com/2016/08/6-5-trillion-missing-from-defense-department/
    1
  18159. World events have shaped China, now China is shaping world events.
    1
  18160. Even though Georgian Dream won the elections, Georgia's President (who was born in France) has annouced that she would not recognize the results and that she will not be stepping down. All in the name of "democracy."
    1
  18161. At first, the communist party was small and only had about 50 members initially in 1921, compared to the KMT's superior numbers. By many people's estimates, the communist party should have been wiped out during the Chinese Civil War, but instead, CCP survived from brink of extinction (through the Long March) and emerged to become one of the largest political parties today, with over 80 million members.
    1
  18162. Jun Kitami Agreed. Chiang Kai Shek was even detained by his subordinates (Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng) in order to get him to form an alliance with the communists against the Japanese, an incident known as the Xi'an incident. Otherwise, under his leadership, the KMT would possibly never have allied with the communists against the Japanese, thus depriving the KMT of allies against Japanese forces.
    1
  18163. Japanese forces led by Toyotomi Hideyoshi invaded Korea in 1592 while it was a tributary state of China, with the intention of conquering the Korean Peninsula and China. Upon receiving news of the Invasion, the Ming emperor mobilized and dispatched Chinese soldiers to Korea to help them fend off the invaders.
    1
  18164. The sheer arrogance and hypocrisy of the West against the humbleness and kindness of the East.
    1
  18165. The correct name should be the Communist Party of China (CPC) NOT the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The name of the party in Chinese is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where Zhōngguó (中国) means China and Gòngchǎndǎng (共产党) means Communist Party. So the correct acronym should be CPC instead of CCP.
    1
  18166. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18167. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18168. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18169. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18170. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  18171. 觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18172. 觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18173. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18174. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18175. ​ @jjstudios9766  North Korea needs nuclear weapons, because technically it is still at war with USA, so of course you'll need nukes to defend against USA isn't it? And thus far, the DPRK's missiles are incapable of reaching the US mainland, so why is USA treating DPRK like a threat then? It has been shown that sanctions are ineffective against North Korea, so why is the USA continuing sanctions when it clearly does not work?
    1
  18176. Deren Bong China is helping to bail Malaysia out of its 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) debt. In the first 7 years Malaysia will not have to pay anything - interest and repayment. Although the contract was awarded to China Construction Communications Company, there are terms that state it has to work with local partners.
    1
  18177. The United States lost to North Vietnam and did not defeat North Korea in Korean War. USA been fighting in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, etc for about 15 years, and still no end in sight. The US soldiers kids back home can grow up in this time frame, and USA still hasn't truly won its wars.
    1
  18178.  @rybread1346  All I did was point out that you can't really see what the journalists were doing in the dark, and that the mysterious voice could have possibly been faked, since it was distorted and unnamed. Why don't you attempt to refute my points instead of calling me a paid Chinese troll?
    1
  18179. USA is the one authorizing the Ukraine to strike Russian territory with its missiles, and you're saying it's Russia that's playing with fire here?
    1
  18180. Actually, the protest only consists of about 200,000 protestors, while the majority of all 7,000,000 HK population continue their lives as norml
    1
  18181. Anti-Chinese sentiment is growing in North America sadly, but China welcomes overseas Chinese returning back to the homeland. Be sure to brush up on your Mandarin Chinese skills, before taking the trip home.
    1
  18182.  @jamesjiang2766  China welcome overseas Chinese back home, but China is not immigrant country like USA. In my opinion, US citizenship laws are too loose, as long as foreigners have family relative who are American citizens, they are themselves applicable for US citizenship. That's why many immigrants marry Americans for US citizenship, so they can bring their family over. China's citizenship laws need to be strict, because we have large population and only accept the bare minimum number of immigrants and no more than absolutely necessary. Priority citizenship is offered to doctors, lawyers, businessmen, entrepreneurs, scientists, engineers or people who can contribute to China. Applicants who are refugees, drunks, deadbeats, dissidents, drug addicts, traffickers, sex tourists (sexpats) are given lowest priority for citizenship.
    1
  18183. Perhaps it makes sense in context, only because the West has clearly wronged China in the past during the Century of Humiliation, that they ask themselves such a question. After all, can you trust a country in which you've clearly wronged before?
    1
  18184. NATO is now doing the same to Ukraine with its membership.
    1
  18185. A long-term study by Harvard University and Ash Center has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. So does this mean that you are basically against the Chinese citizens as well as the government?
    1
  18186. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd highest military budget. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-China propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  18187. "Amateurs talk strategy. Professionals talk logistics."
    1
  18188. Chinese political system is constantly undergoing change, from Mao Zedong's Marxism, to Deng Xiaoping's Capitalism, and now, President Xi Jinping's Socialism with Chinese characteristics. If certain policies just don't work, then it is pragmatic to discontinue them, and if other policies work, then they should be continued. Changes made to Chinese constitution should be welcomed instead. In contrast, Western democracies have been undergoing severe political "stagnation" for several years, because of its refusal to make sweeping reforms. I mean, LGBT rights is one thing, but surely there are many more important priorities.
    1
  18189.  @PhiloSurfer  Colonial mentality is definitely present in all the former British colonies, whether it's India or the Philippines, Singapore or even Hong Kong. The colonizer not only colonized lands, but they also colonize the local people's minds through cultural interactions and education systems. Even after the colonizer left, the minds of many local people remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. "Singapore is an independent country, and Taiwan is not. That's why the Commonwealth idea is a compromise." The term "commonwealth" is strongly associated with the colonial powers. It might even be an attempt by Britain to retain some degree of control over its former colonies (of which Singapore happens to be one). I mean, Singapore itself is a member of the British Commonwealth, despite being an independent country, so how is the commonwealth a compromise?
    1
  18190.  @reebud  "all of those 56 ethnic group is considered as Chinese race." So you're saying Mongolians, Tibetans, Uighurs, Kazakhs (and even the Koreans living at China's doorstep with Korea) are all considered as Chinese race? Even when the Uighurs and Kazakhs have Caucasoid racial features, yet they are considered part of the Chinese race? So because Outer Mongolia was historically part of China, so are you saying they should join this Chinese commonwealth? Vietnam was historically part of China during Han Dynasty, so they should also join this Chinese commonwealth? Good luck trying to get Mongolia and Vietnam to join this Chinese commonwealth just because they were once historically part of China. And if Singapore themselves are unwilling to join this Chinese commonwealth, again what do you think the chances are that George Yeo would be able to convince Taiwan to join this Chinese commonwealth? It's as slim as getting Mongolia or Vietnam to join.
    1
  18191.  @reebud  Taipei Times published a scathing response to George Yeo's suggestion of a Chinese commonwealth. entitled: Maybe Singapore should join China The article suggests that perhaps Yeo should first conduct a survey in Singapore by asking how many Singporeans are willing for Singapore to form a “Chinese commonwealth” with China. If the majority approved, Yeo could then sell the idea to Taiwan.
    1
  18192. Craig Dillon China has world's longest range ICBM, the DF-41, with an operational range of 13,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the US LGM-30 Minuteman which has range of 13,000 km. The mountain range does not really protect India, if Chinese missiles can literally fly over beyond the Himalayas.
    1
  18193. In mountainous terrain combat scenario, the PLA can make use of aerial units like combat UAVs, such as domestically made Caihong-5 for strategic surveillance and reconnaissance missions. Its also capable of equipping air to ground missiles to engage in combat with ground units while in the air and has often been compared with the US Reaper drone. But in December 2017, Indian army crashed its Israeli-made drone while trespassing in Chinese airspace.
    1
  18194. China is 3rd country in the world to demonstrate anti-satellite capabilities by taking out a 750 kg satellite in orbit at altitude of 865 km, using a ground launched missile in 2007. China is the only Asian nation to demonstrate this capability, beating Japan, Korea, India, etc, in this region. If PLA destroys Indian military satellites in space, it will put Indian ground troops at a disadvantage without satellite communications and coordinations.
    1
  18195. 9th Army Why are you accusing me of lying? Which part of what I said is untrue?
    1
  18196. Satbir Singh Chinese missiles have Multiple Independent Reentry Vehicle (MIRV) capabilities in which a single missile can hold up to 5-10 warheads, allowing up to 5-10 targets to be targeted independently with each launch.
    1
  18197. India has not demonstrated any MIRV capabilities yet. China's missiles are capable of taking out satellites in space, and if PLA destroys Indian Army satellites in space, the Indian ground troops would be handicapped without satellite communications and coordination on the ground.
    1
  18198. 说的对 说的对！所以我前上面说的话都是战术武器，譬如彩虹无人机、东风弹道导弹、反卫星武器。
    1
  18199. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past. Today, and China is the world's 2nd largest economy (largest economy by GDP PPP), the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest research spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership.
    1
  18200. +Grimmm1234 Thanks. In my opinion, its good for game developer (CA) to experiment and try out other settings for a change, instead of churning out more of the same old settings all the time.
    1
  18201.  @bulkychalky9697  They stay for months, because education requires many months, even several years to properly educate children. Under traditional Uighur culture, most parents don't even send their kids to school, instead they just stay at home and read the Koran (Islam holy book) until they are old enough to help their parents tend to their kebab stalls by the roadside. That's why Chinese government is conducting compulsory education here.
    1
  18202.  @pedrosanchez455 said: "In China, those children are taken away from their parents and they have no say in their education or upbringing." The US has deported more than half a million parents since 2009 due to illegal immigration. Source: washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/09/21/this-is-what-would-happen-to-the-children-of-11-million-illegal-immigrants-if-president-trump-deported-them/ So what makes you think United States doesn't take away children from their parents?
    1
  18203.  @reymondsy395  "神州 Shenzhou isnt it Youtube banned in PRC?" No it isn't banned, since nobody will arrest you for accessing YouTube while in People's Republic of China.
    1
  18204.  @macgruber7948  "神州 Shenzhou Why is it that they were forced against their will to attend?" Under Chinese laws, all citizens must attend school for at least 9 years, known as the 9-year compulsory education, funded by the government. Compulsory education includes 6 years of primary education, starting at age six or seven, and 3 years of junior secondary education (junior middle school) for ages 12 to 15.
    1
  18205.  Gazi Lazlo  Would those "Uighur extremists" rather join ISIS and sacrifice their lives to promote terrorist's cause? It is estimated that around 4,000 people have left their homes in the West to migrate to ISIS. Many have become jihadist fighters in the apparent hope of achieving martyrdom. Source: Why Are Westerners Attracted to ISIS theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/07/isis-foreign-fighters-political-pilgrims/399209/ Chinese government is stopping these extremist from leaving Xinjiang and joining the terrorists in the Middle East. Look at how many Muslims from the West join ISIS because of radicalism, because Westerners are doing nothing about it. Thanks to Chinese efforts, there are less potential recruits for terrorists to radicalise in Xinjiang and lives are being saved in the West, because of China. But the Westerners do nothing about terrorism, and if you do nothing then of course, nothing will change.
    1
  18206.  @pedrosanchez455  The United States deported half a million illegal immigrant parents from their children since 2009 and there is NO solution for them to get reunited again. Whereas in China, the Uighur children are being given a proper Chinese education and once they completed their education, they will be reunited with their parents eventually. So how is what China doing any worst compared to USA deporting parents from their children? At least in China, the Uighurs will be reunited once their education is completed, whereas there is no solution to USA deporting illegal immigrant parents from their kids.
    1
  18207.  @bulkychalky9697  Xinjiang is part of China long before Islam itself was even born! Only later did the Islamic invaders conquered the region and converted the natives to Islam. Then why can't China convert the Uighurs back to Chinese (the word is Sinicize I believe) ? Xinjiang is part of China, and the Uighurs are Chinese citizens isn't it?
    1
  18208.  @bulkychalky9697  China is not the United States, so why are you comparing Chinese kindergarten with kindergarten in the U.S? Lots of Asian countries have barb wire along their schools, its to prevent trespassers and kidnappers from entering the premises and harming the kids or abducting them. And who says they aren't allowed to go home? At 29:17 the conversation between the kindergarten student and the journalist reveals that 13 students live on campus. So doesn't that imply that the rest of the students don't live in school, and that they return home once classes are over?
    1
  18209.  @bulkychalky9697  So you believed what the biased VICE News said about no parents were there to pick up their children, but you don't believe the actual words of the kindergarten girl being interviewed, that only 13 students lived on campus? What sort of biased mindset do you have against China?
    1
  18210.  @pedrosanchez455  Those half a million US-deported illegal immigrant parents from their kids don't have a choice which school their kids attend too. China is an atheist country, so why can't we promote atheism among our kids? Look at Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia and they promote Islam in their schools isn't it? Women aren't allowed to drive in Saudi Arabia, and women must be escorted at all times by a male relative or family member while in public, but these are Saudi Arabia's rules isn't it? Look at Indonesia, world's largest Muslim population country and Suharto banned expressions of Chinese culture through language, religion, and traditional festivals and the ethnic Chinese were pressured to adopt Indonesian-sounding names. But since it's Indonesian law, then Chinese have to obey isn't it? So why can't Chinese government give these Uighurs (who are Chinese citizens) a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese, Chinese characters and promoting atheism in our schools as well? And those Uighur parents don't educate their children, they just stay home all day and read the Koran, that's why some of them become radicalised and flock to join the terrorists in the Middle East and kill people. China is helping to do the world a favor by preventing Muslim extremism from developing among the Uighurs, whereas in the the West, it is estimated that around 4,000 people have left their homes in the West to migrate to ISIS. Why West allow those 4,000 people to join terrorism you tell me?
    1
  18211.  @bulkychalky9697  That woman's child is being given a proper Chinese education (since education is compulsory in China) whereas under traditional Uighur culture, most Uighur parents don't send their kids to school, many just sit at home and read the Quran (Islamic holy book) all day. That's why some Uighurs are being radicalised and flocking to join terrorists in Middle East like in Turkey for example. Source: Turkey’s military intelligence identifies 4,000 Turkish ISIL militants, 69 jihadist groups nordicmonitor.com/2019/04/turkeys-military-intel-identifies-4000-active-isil-turkish-militants-69-jihadist-groups/ If China has helped prevented these Uighurs with links to terrorism in Turkey from joining their extremist brethren in Turkey, then China has clearly done a good service in the fight against terrorism. China is giving the Uighurs a chance at a proper life, studying in school and graduating to become productive members of society, instead of a life of extremism.
    1
  18212.  @bulkychalky9697  Her parents are always welcome to come back to Xinjiang, China if they cared about their kid so much. Why go to Turkey, where there have been some 4,000 Turkish ISIL militants, and 69 jihadist groups? It's highly possible that she would be sent to a extremist school in Turkey and trained to become a terrorist and sacrifice her life and bright future for the terrorist's cause. Instead she is now safe and secure in Xinjiang school, receiving proper Chinese education, eating well, playing hard and studying hard to become productive member of society when she graduates. China has compulsory education, and all citizens must attend school for at least 9 years, known as the 9-year compulsory education, which is funded by the government and includes 6 years of primary education, starting at age 6 or 7, and 3 years of junior secondary education (junior middle school) for ages 12 to 15.
    1
  18213.  @bulkychalky9697  How was she treated harshly? And China is providing free education which is mandatory in China. All citizens must attend school for at least nine years, known as the nine-year compulsory education, which is funded by the government. Compulsory education includes six years of primary education, starting at age six or seven, and three years of junior secondary education (junior middle school) for ages 12 to 15. So what makes you think that there is no chance of getting her daughter back from school? Her child will be safe in China, away from the numerous terrorists factions that plague Turkey, and she will be studying Mandarin Chinese (world's most spoken language by number of speakers) and graduating to a better life, rather that sacrificing her life as a terrorist in Turkey. China is helping doing the world a favor by reducing the number of potential recruits for terrorists, and granting Uighurs better job opportunities after they have received a proper Chinese education.
    1
  18214.  @bulkychalky9697  Do you have evidence that she is being forced to eat pork or sing? Her daughter looks happy in the video singing, so what makes you claim that she is being forced to sing? You said before that the parents are treated harshly but could you elaborate how?
    1
  18215.  @bulkychalky9697  China's education system is has made China the world's 3rd most popular destination for international students and the most popular in Asian region, surpassing even Japan, Korea, Singapore, India, etc, according to Institute of International Education. Source: China ranks 3rd among countries that host the most international students usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/2013/10/08/explore-the-worlds-top-universities
    1
  18216.  @bulkychalky9697  China is atheist country, so why should our education system include Islamic teachings? If you go to Islamic countries then their educational systems might include Islamic teaching and they teach the glory of Islam to their students. But since those Uighurs are Chinese citizens, then what's wrong with giving them a atheist, Chinese education? We are imparting positive Chinese virtues like being studious and industrious, rather than wasting time praying 5 times a day, fasting for an entire month (not healthy for the body) and so on.
    1
  18217. +Chris Pyle What "Indians" ? Indians come from India, not America, like the Native Americans. The Native Americans may have fought wars but they still welcomed the foreign powers with peace pipes. But Western powers choose not to integrate with Native Americans, and instead forced them to integrate with themselves, losing their language and their traditions instead. What about African slaves forced from their homelands to do laborious work in America? What about Hispanic Americans, who were here well before the British, but treated as different from Caucasians? What about Chinese laborers helping build American railroads and infrastructure, but forbidden from acquiring citizenship by Chinese Exclusion Act? About Chinese 1 million deaths in 1950-51, in the end, China is still being ruled by Chinese, so what's your point here? According to the following source China's population was 556,613,000 in 1950 and in 563,000,000 in 1951 so what is the overall impact on China as a whole? Source populstat.info/Asia/chinac.htm
    1
  18218. chris leonard Westerners can't even pronounce Xi correctly, when in Mandarin it sounds much closer to the letter "C" or "see", rather than "she". Where the "h" sound comes from, I don't know...
    1
  18219. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18220. China prioritize saving lives at the expense of business. Whereas the West prioritize saving businesses at the expense of lives.
    1
  18221. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18222. Undoubtedly, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18223.  @christt6809  Under the authoritarian rule of Chiang kai-shek, Taiwan flourished and prospered under single party KMT rule and Taiwan was even one of the Four Asian Tigers (aka Four Asian Dragons) for their rapid economic growth. But since democracy was introduced to Taiwan, it's economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving for jobs in the mainland or Singapore. Video: How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents | Insight | CNA Insider youtu.be/P3BCnPb8qHY?t=110 "From the '90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreements on policy matters. This produced less effective policy making. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be more conservative in Taiwan, so they do not enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou, Research Fellow, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica
    1
  18224.  @christt6809  It's evident that Taiwan's prosperity and economic growth was achieved under the leadership of authoritarian single-party KMT, then is there really a need for Taiwan to adopt Western brand of democracy? As for the mainland, previously China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past but fast forward till today and China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    1
  18225.  @christt6809  "神州 Shenzhou It is interesting that I ask you a personal question, you dont awnser it, and just try to mislead me with Pro-Authoritarian video." How is a pro-authoritarian video misleading? I'm showing an example that Taiwan was more successful under authoritarian KMT rule, than they are under democracy today, just look at the Taiwan parliament brawling among themselves, throwing water balloons and even pig guts (at 8:20 ) and you really think I would like to be part of such a system?
    1
  18226.  @christt6809  You asked: "So again do you want your faith decide by you or by your government?" I am an agnostic person myself, but regarding your question about religion in China, if you are a Christian or Muslim or some other religious person, then as long as you register yourself with the proper agencies in China, then the government will leave you alone. There are approximately 5,500 religious groups in China, including seven national organizations which are Buddhist Association of China, Chinese Taoist Association, China Islamic Association, Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association, Bishops’ Conference of Catholic Church in China, National Committee of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement of the Protestant Churches in China, and China Christian Council. However, if a religious person refuses to register themselves properly then they might find themselves in a government crackingdown on those underground churches. I mean, unless they are Satanic worshipers or some other cult, then what do they have to fear from properly registering themselves with the government?
    1
  18227.  @christt6809  You asked: "How much implication do you want in politic? Also, is economy the only preocupation, and how those other preocupation could impede the economy." About Western brand of democracy, why do you think allowing ordinary people to participate in political-decision making is a wise idea? Ordinary people are fickle and they make poor voters for several reasons: -Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (i.e they might not turn up to vote, or they submit blank votes) -Ordinary people may vote based on emotions, not logic (i.e Many British people don't like immigrants, so majority of them voted for Brexit) -Ordinary people may be susceptible to foreign influence (i.e Russian social media accounts influenced Trump voters leading to Trump's election in 2016) -Ordinary people may simply lack political awareness of their country's situation to make such important decisions that will impact the country's future. ... There's a host of other reasons why allowing ordinary people to participate in political decision-making is a bad idea. My answer is why not let those who know how to govern, govern? That's what China is doing, and under the Communist Party leadership, China is improving everyday. To answer the second part of your question, while the economy is the primary consideration, but of course there are other concerns like rising inequality and achieving better work-life balance.
    1
  18228.  @christt6809  "What amout of your wealth are you ready to sacrify for them? How can you sent that message to a government who care only about is own agenda?" And what is the government's agenda? The Chinese Dream is the eventual rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. Millions of Chinese have been lifted out of poverty and into the middle class, because the goal of the government is to achieve a "moderately well-off society". And this means that the wealth of millionaires in China or people who've gotten rich through worker exploitation need to be re-channeled into helping lifting more people out of poverty. In China, the Chinese government controls the Chinese companies for China's benefit, reining in companies when they've strayed too far. However, in the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary American taxpayers.
    1
  18229.  @christt6809  You asked: "Also what make you believe they are that great of a leader? Do they realy work for the good a the nation?" President Xi Jinping has shown to be competent and able to guide China through the pandemic and still deliver economic growth to China (the only country to experience positive economic growth in 2020) then why can't China leave President Xi in power to continue governing our country? President Xi Jinping has at least 40 years of political experience and that's why many Chinese feel that he's qualified to lead the country. Whereas the former U.S President Trump has had zero political experience before he became president, yet the majority of Americans voted for Trump as president in 2016? Then why allowed ordinary people to participate in political decision-making when it will impact the country's future? China has found a political system that works for our country, then is there any reason why we should abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so? "They are so many crackdown on corruption that as become a way to eliminate political opponent." Corruption is a universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-corruption campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. Whether political opponent or not, if the opposition is corrupted, then why can't they get rid of the corrupted opposition? But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign, but after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption. "And you believe you should only look at the show and accept the result?" It's not just show, people in China's lives have greatly improved. Over 800 million people in China have been lifted out of poverty and into the middle class, and President Xi's corruption crackdown has removed many corrupt high ranking officials as well as smaller corrupted officials (we call them tigers and flies) and the ordinary people have felt the impact of less corruption in the government. So how is it only for show?
    1
  18230.  @christt6809  "神州 Shenzhou I'm glad to see that you trust your leader to give you the life you espect." Look at Donald Trump and did he deliver the results that Americans expect? Or even Joe Biden, look at his botched withdrawal of U.S forces from Afghanistan. I'm no miltary expert myself, but the proper methodology of withdrawal should be 1) Evacuate the civilians first, 2) Followed by military equipment, 3) Finally, withdraw the troops once everything else has been evacuated. But Joe Biden just evacuate the troops first, and leave the civilians and military equipment behind at the mercy of the Taliban. Yet Americans voted to elect such a President like Biden?
    1
  18231.  @christt6809  "The population should be able to say no when their decision do not please the majority." Politics should be about doing what's right, not what's popular. Sometimes, the popular thing may not be right, and the right thing may not be popular. For example, entering lockdown may not be popular for people, but it's what necessary to control the spread of the coronavirus. Wearing mask may not be popular, but that's what needed to combat the spread of Covid-19, just like getting vaccinated. It's a combination these methods that China is able to control to Covid-19 situation in our country, where it is spiralling out of control in the West, because of anti-vaxxers, anti-mask wearers and people protesting lockdowns. Like I said earlier, what's popular may not be what's right, and what's right may not be what's popular.
    1
  18232.  @christt6809  "Emotion for exemple, are the miror of our desire. Even emotional decision has a part of logic." What people desire may not necessarily be the best thing for themselves. Anti-Maskers, anti-vaxxers and people protesting lockdowns are putting their emotions over logic, and like my earlier example, the British voted to leave the EU, primarily because many British don't like immigrants. And if your country has a huge population with low literacy rates (i.e India) it becomes even harder to control when majority of your voters vote on emotions. "Spontaneity reveal truth that deep thinking sometime just can't." That does happen, but how often does it happen? It's a rare occurrence, almost akin to gambling. Choosing one's leaders concerns the future of the country and so much is as stake, then why leave it up to spontaneity? It makes no sense. "Consider the diversity of profession, life experience, religion, race, belief, occupation, etc..." The Communist Party of China is perhaps, one of the world's largest political parties at over 90 million members (about the population size of Germany) and it's membership is extremely diverse. Farmers, herdsmen and fishermen make up 26 million members; members identifying as workers totalled 7.2 million. Managers, professional and technical staff in enterprises and public institutions made up 12.5 million, 9 million identified as working in administrative staff and 7.4 million described themselves as party cadres. It's this diversity that reflects a microcosm of China, but the difference is that these people are communist party members that are politically qualified to make decisions regarding the country's future.
    1
  18233.  @christt6809  "神州 Shenzhou 90 million member? And what about the 1.3 billion other?" Look at India, the world's largest democracy and why hasn't India surpassed China, despite India being a Western brand of democracy? Because many Indian voters suffer from the same problems I highlighted earlier, they vote base on emotions, not logic, they don't understand the political situation of their country, and that's why India is in their current state. Since China has found a political system that clearly works for China, then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western style democracy like India? "Nobody choose the country they are born in. Why should they pledge allegence to a party that pretend representing them?" Apart from the Communist Party of China (CPC) 中国共产党（中共） there are 8 other political parties in China and they are: -China Zhi Gong Party (CZGP) 中国致公党（致公党） -Chinese Peasants' and Workers' Democratic Party (CPWDP) 中国农工民主党（农工党） -China Democratic League (CDL) 中国民主同盟（民盟） -Jiusan Society (JS) 九三学社 -China National Democratic Construction Association (CNDCA) 中国民主建国会（民建） -China Association for Promoting Democracy (CAPD) 中国民主促进会（民进） -Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League (TDSGL) 台湾民主自治同盟（台盟） -Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang (RCCK) 中国国民党革命委员会（民革）
    1
  18234.  @christt6809  You said: "Look how they let the housing bubble grow up during many years, despite many economist advice." Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a compiled list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for 30 years already?
    1
  18235.  @christt6809  You said: "Your government want to bring the chinese economy less dependent on export and more oriented on is internal market." Because the United States slapped tariffs on Chinese goods entering their country to make Chinese good more expensive to their 300 million American consumers. If China can somehow transform our 1.4 billion population into consumers ourselves, then China would be the largest consumer market in the world (if we aren't already). China cannot control what the U.S choosing to tariff Chinese goods, but China can control our internal market to boost consumer demand. You said: "Many foreign company leave China, du to the rise of the cost of labour and to spread more evenly their factory in the country around." Yes, Chinese wages are increasing leading to increased labor costs, so one possible solution is automation and robotics to help keep labor costs low. China is already the largest market for automation and China unveiled Asia's first fully automated port to help lower labor costs. China cannot stop companies leaving and setting up factories elsewhere. But if China can transform our 1.4 billion population into consumers, then China would be the largest consumer market, so factories are still enticed to sell their goods to China. Without U.S tariffs too.
    1
  18236.  @christt6809  You said: "Also, a growing number of foreign investor become affraid to invest in Chinese compagny." Video: China overtakes US as top country for foreign investment youtu.be/o-VHewwSz3A UN figures show China was the largest recipient of new foreign direct investment in 2020, overtaking the US for the first time. The Chinese economy brought in 163 billion dollars in investment compared to the 134 billion attracted by the United States.
    1
  18237.  @christt6809  Those parties can offer advise to the Communist Party of China on policies, they are there to help guide the CPC. And since such a system clearly works for China, then is there really a need to abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Look at India, the world's largest Western style democracy with 1.3 billion people and why hasn't India surpassed China? "If that system work, how do you explain a 90% approuval of the top leadership but only 11% of the local one, since the local is under the leadership of the top one?" Local provincial governments have the autonomy to run their own provinces and the central government in Beijing doesn't interfere with the local policies. However, if a local government has shown to be incompetent, then the higher-ups might step in and take over leadership of the local region. For example, during the outbreak in Wuhan, some Wuhan provincial government officials were found to be incompetent and fired from their posts and replaced by central government officials and the situation in Wuhan improved after that. But compare this system in China to the United States. Several local governors in the United States performed poorly in their handling of Covid19, and yet nobody is fired for their negligence in leading to USA topping the world in number of Covid19 deaths, shouldn't this sound off alarm bells that something is wrong with the system? And yet you seemingly expect China to abandon our system (that clearly works for China) and to adopt a Western brand of democracy?
    1
  18238.  @christt6809  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    1
  18239.  @christt6809  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a Map of all the territory Taiwan claims (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) So you are a Westerner yourself? Then why do you insist on imposing your own Western brand of democracy onto China? China has found a political system that clearly works for our country, then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western style democracy?
    1
  18240.  @NaughtyNovaroo69  "China is apart of Taiwan the country and only china the rebels not a country should surrender with no buts to Taiwan the country" Then why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while at the same time cementing the communists right to rule China.
    1
  18241.  @OriginalPiMan  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwan only still "claims" all of China because they know that reducing the claim to just the territory they currently control would be seen as a declaration of independence," So that means Taiwan clearly isn't independent, after all, since they can't even modify their constitution. And since there are no amendments, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Majority of the people of Taiwan want the status quo to continue, and the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution, is that Taiwan is part of China. Yet despite these 3 points, people are still telling me "Taiwan is independent" or "The people of Taiwan want independence" when this is clearly not the case.
    1
  18242.  @OriginalPiMan  "神州 Shenzhou The status quo is not getting invaded by China (and not being ruled by China). That's what over 80% of Taiwanese people are seeking to preserve." The status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then majority of the people of Taiwan prefer to remain as part of China, since that's what's written in their constitution like you said earlier and that "declaring independence" is effectively changing the status quo. "If China were to guarantee they wouldn't invade in response to a declaration of independence, then Taiwan would declare independence as quick as feasibly possible (currently requiring a referendum, that would easily pass)" This is all just speculation on your part. John Oliver's poll at 18:30 indicates that only a minority of the people of Taiwan (5.6%) want independence.
    1
  18243.  @OriginalPiMan  You said: "The status quo is that their constitution says one thing but the reality in Taiwan is something else: An independent nation." You claim Taiwan is an independent nation, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations and the World Health Organization? Is there some force preventing Taiwan from joining the UN and the WHO like an independent nation could?
    1
  18244.  @OriginalPiMan  "The point is that the average Taiwanese person is wealthier than the average Chinese person; that *per capita*, Taiwan is wealthier than China." On a per capita basis, mainland China has the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people, so if you divide our GDP by our enormous population, then obviously our GDP Per Capita would be smaller than Taiwan island. If you look at the GDP per capita of India (world's 2nd most populous country) it's far lower than China's GDP per capita. Also, I've previously asked you where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? Take drones for example and mainland China has produced many successful civilian drone companies like DJI, Yuneec, EHang, and so on. Top 10 Drone Companies in the world – 2020 (By Global Brands) 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Yuneec (Chinese) 4. Kespry (American) 5. Autel Robotics (American) 6. Skydio (American) 7. Insitu (American) 8. Delair (French) 9. EHang (Chinese) 10. Aerialtronics (Netherlands) But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland?
    1
  18245.  @OriginalPiMan  "神州 Shenzhou It's the declaration that would be changing the status quo. The independence is already there." So if the declaration is changing the status quo, then majority of the people of Taiwan are against the declaration of independence, since they prefer the status quo to continue. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution, is that Taiwan is part of China, since there are no amendments to it's constitution. And how is Taiwan independent when Taiwan cannot join the United Nations or the World Health Organization? Is there some force that's preventing Taiwan from joining the UN and the WHO like an independent nation could? "And it's not speculation. Just 5.6% want independence declared ASAP, sure (even fewer want unity)." Yes, only a minority of the people polled want independence, the majority of the people of Taiwan want the status quo to continue, which according to Taiwan's constitution, that Taiwan is part of China. "But almost 60% of the elected legislature have policies of wanting independence eventually, including the ruling Democratic Progressive Party." But you said earlier that (and I quote your words) requires a referendum, then what has the elected legislature even got to do with this? In short, it's just your own speculation after all, when only a minority (5.6%) of the people of Taiwan want independence.
    1
  18246.  @OriginalPiMan  "神州 Shenzhou I don't think anyone would argue that India is wealthier than China by any measure, and I never brought India up; they aren't relevant to the conversation." So you want to compare a per capita basis between Taiwan and the mainland, well I've already explained that the mainland has to divide our GDP by our enormous population, that's why our GDP per capita is lower than Taiwan. If you compare with India's GDP per capita, it's even lower than China, despite India being a Western style democratic country. And if you're looking for the biggest Taiwanese companies, then you're looking in the wrong industries. Taiwan's biggest companies are mostly in the fields of electronics and superconductors. Is that all Taiwan's got? Take banking for example, and China is home to many of the world's largest banks, including Bank of China, China Construction Bank, ICBC AgBank, Postal Savings Bank of China, China Bank of Communications, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank (China), China Minsheng Bank, Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, China China CITIC Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Huaxia Bank, Bank of Beijing, China Guangfa Bank, Bank of Shanghai, Bank of Jiangsu, China Zheshang Bank, and so on. Source: Wikipedia: List of Largest Banks But where's the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland?
    1
  18247.  @OriginalPiMan  "And on the topic of whether Taiwanese people actually want independence, you're being deliberately obtuse." How am I being obtuse? My arguments are grounded in facts, not speculation unlike yours. Clearly, Taiwan isn't independent since Taiwan cannot join the UN and the WHO like an independent country can. The polls indicate only a minority of the people of Taiwan (5.6%) want independence, and the majority want the status quo to continue. The status quo according to Taiwan's constitution, is that Taiwan is part of China, and any amendment to this would be seen as changing the status quo (in which majority of the people of Taiwan do not support) So how am I being obtuse? I have presented a solid argument based on facts, whereas yours is a hypothetical scenario based on speculations that's all. I mean, how can anyone predict what the result of a referendum/poll will be?
    1
  18248.  @OriginalPiMan  "神州 Shenzhou The style of government is not well correlated with the economic strength of the country, so the fact that India is a democracy is irrelevant." Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Even John Oliver mentions this at 6:20 mark of the video. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    1
  18249.  @OriginalPiMan  Take a look at Fortune Global 500, an annual ranking of the top 500 corporations worldwide as measured by revenue and Chinese companies dominate that list List of the top 10 countries with the highest revenues top 500 companies 1. China (135 companies) 2. United States (122 companies) 3. Japan (53 companies) 4. Germany (27 companies) 5. France (26 companies) 6. United Kingdom (22 companies) 7. South Korea (15 companies) 8. Switzerland (13 companies) 9. Canada (12 companies) 10. Netherlands (11 companies) ... Source: Fortune Global 500 But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? Only in electronics and semiconductors? "There are plenty of companies that will never get any companies on one of these lists, and yet no one questions the right to independence of most of those." Because those countries are independent whereas Taiwan clearly isn't independent (for reasons I've gone over several times) Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent nation could. Only a minority of people in Taiwan want independence (5.6%) whereas majority of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo to continue. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that *Taiwan is part of China,f any move to amend it's constitution and declare independence is changing the status quo, which the majority oppose. These are my arguments that are grounded on facts here, unlike your speculation.
    1
  18250.  @OriginalPiMan  "神州 Shenzhou You continue to be deliberately obtuse about their desire for independence." Again, how am I obtuse? The status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China, even you admitted that not amending their constitution is (and I quote your word) "aligned with the status quo desire of the vast majority of the population." You keep saying that the lived reality is that they are independent, then why Taiwan cannot join the UN like an independent country can? My arguments are well grounded in reality, whereas yours are speculation, that "Taiwan would declare independence as quick as feasibly possible (currently requiring a referendum, that would easily pass)" But only a minority of people in Taiwan want independence (5.6%) whereas the majority of the people of Taiwan want the status quo to continue. You brought up "60% of the elected legislature have policies of wanting independence eventually" but those are policies, not the referendum which you claim is required, so how is it not speculation? Another thing to I noted from you, is that whenever I bring up China's success, you attribute it to China also having the world's largest population. But India has the world's 2nd largest population, yet why India's economy nearly as successful as China, if it's population size that determines economic size? And when you started comparing GDP Per Capita, I've remarked that if you divide our GDP by our enormous population, you'll arrive at a per capita that's obviously less than Taiwan island. But suddenly, you just dismiss size as not a significant factor. It's like you have double standards, you claim China's success is because of population size (then why India doesn't hold up?) and yet you claim size is not a significant factor when it comes to comparing GDP per capita for China.
    1
  18251.  @OriginalPiMan  Apart from Chinese companies, mainland China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen and Taiwan's hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE
    1
  18252.  @OriginalPiMan  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwan can't join international organisations because one much larger country has the ability to prevent it..." Congratulations, you've just confirmed that Taiwan really isn't independent after all, since Taiwan cannot join the UN and there's a force preventing Taiwan from doing so. You see, this is what I mean by making an argument grounded in facts, yet why have you accused me (twice) of being obtuse? Even you admitted earlier that not declaring independence is (and I quote your words) "aligned with the status quo desire of the vast majority of the population." since the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. The speculative part is when you claimed "Taiwan would declare independence as quick as feasibly possible (currently requiring a referendum, that would easily pass)" even when the polls indicate only a minority of the people of Taiwan want independence (5.6%). Even when you said 60% of the elected legislature have policies of wanting independence eventually, but it all boils down to the requirement of referendum like you said, not whether the elective legislature have policies of wanting independence or not. Also, why is it you can attribute China's economic size to our population size (which according to your logic, India should be around the same economic size as China due to their world's 2nd largest population). However, when I bring up population size as the reason why our GDP per capita is lower than Taiwan island, you seemingly dismiss it as not significant?
    1
  18253.  @OriginalPiMan  Besides fast trains, mainland China is home to one of Top 5 world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) Video: Sunway TaihuLight named world's fastest supercomputer youtu.be/KEdsrT1mFAU But where are the supercomputers from Taiwan as compared to the mainland?
    1
  18254.  @OriginalPiMan  "Independence is whether or not the country is subservient to the laws of another country. Taiwan is not, therefore Taiwan is independent." But we've established several times that Taiwan is subservient to mainland China's laws, they can't declare independence or amend their constitution, neither can Taiwan join the United Nations, so Taiwan is clearly not independent after all, since they are subservient to mainland China's laws. Also, why'd you labeled me obtuse when I have shown that only a minority of the people of Taiwan want independence (5.6%) whereas majority of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Any amendments or declaration of independence would be changing the status quo, a scenario that majority of the people of Taiwan don't want. Whereas your argument is based on speculation that's all, yet you're calling me obtuse?
    1
  18255.  @OriginalPiMan  "And giving me a high score table of Chinese companies or infrastructure projects *is not relevant*." Earlier you can boast about Taiwan's economy punching above its weight, then can't I do the same for mainland China? China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  18256.  @OriginalPiMan  You can boast about Taiwan's economy and their electronics and semiconductor companies then can't I do the same for Chinese companies and infrastructure projects?
    1
  18257.  @OriginalPiMan  North Korea and South Korea are members of the United Nations, so is Ukraine and South East Asian countries. As for the South China Sea claims, what's that even got to do with this discussion?
    1
  18258.  @OriginalPiMan  "神州 Shenzhou These are countries that can't fully utilise their own territories because China or some other country also lays claim to that territory." But Ukraine and the two Koreas are recognised independent countries in the UN, whereas Taiwan Island isn't. Speaking of claimed territories, Taiwan claims in the South China Sea are more extensive than the mainland, they had the 11 Dash Line claim since 1947, as compared to mainland China's 9 Dash Line. Hong Kong has their own government (HK government) separate from the mainland, they have their own separate currency (HK dollars) their own separate passports (HK passports) and yet after 1997, Hong Kong is part of China, just like Taiwan is part of China. Many major countries in the world (i.e USA, UK, Canada, Australia, France, Germany, European countries etc) all recognise the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China, and there are Taiwan has no embassies in those countries.
    1
  18259.  @OriginalPiMan  "神州 Shenzhou @神州 Shenzhou With or without the north western portion of the line, the line is completely spurious," I assume you're talking about North and South Korea. The point is that the two Koreas are recognized as independent countries in the UN (so is Ukraine) and the People's Republic of China is recognized as holding China's seat in the UN, while Taiwan isn't recognized in the UN. "Taiwan has no de jure embassies, but more than a handful of defacto embassies." Those countries that have so-called "embassies" don't even recognize Taiwan as independent, they recognize Taiwan as part of China. For example, since the 1972 Shanghai Communique, the United States recognize the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China. According to The Diplomat explanation of Shanghai Communique: On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia... The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position. "And Hong Kong is not independent." Neither is Taiwan, we've already gone through how Taiwan cannot join the UN like an independent country can. Hong Kong is there to show that others can have all those things like separate government, separate currency, passport, but they still aren't independent, they are part of China like Taiwan is. "no one can be a politician in Hong Kong without approval from Beijing," That's in accordance with Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條) which states that: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." And you know who wrote Hong Kong Basic Law? Both mainland China and Britain, and the British approved it and allowed it.
    1
  18260.  @OriginalPiMan  "and the laws of the mainland supercede the laws of Hong Kong (despite the 50 year agreement as part the UK returning the territory 25 years ago)." Territory that was taken from China by the British, yet they seek to impose "conditions" for its return? During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  18261.  @OriginalPiMan  Nobody will come arrest people for simply logging into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    1
  18262. Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  18263.  Akimbo Soulassassin  "Chinese money is only worth 16 cents to the USD." That makes Chinese products cheaper to Americans, while making American products more expensive to Chinese. If Chinese Renminbi was the same value as US Dollar, then Chinese goods would be expensive, instead of more value-for-money that they are today. The Western countries decoupling from China, would mean that the cost of living in those countries are going to be higher.
    1
  18264.  Akimbo Soulassassin  But how are companies going to ship their products from India all the way to America? India lacks the infrastructure China has, take ports for example and China is home to many of the world's busiest ports. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports Source: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage But how is India going to match China's sheer volume of container traffic? China's infrastructure is what makes our products more affordable to the masses.
    1
  18265.  Akimbo Soulassassin  If China can someday surpass the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this eventual goal of ours?
    1
  18266.  Akimbo Soulassassin  It's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    1
  18267.  @sebg5145  China is currently following "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics" where China is in the primary stage of socialism and needed to engage in economic growth before pursuing a more egalitarian form of socialism, with the eventual goal being communism (as described in Marxist orthodoxy). China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: National Geographic: Big,Bigger,Biggest:Dam S02E08 youtu.be/j3J196bLP5E
    1
  18268.  @holboroman  With Chinese invention of paper, came inventions like paper lanterns, paper umbrellas and paper banknote (which made business transactions easier since merchants need not carry around lots of metal coinage and precious stones) Mankind's first aviation was in the form of paper kite, and even hot air balloons were invented in China, and were known as Sky Lanterns (天灯) or Kongming Lanterns (孔明灯) Here is beautiful video of RISE Lantern Festival in Las Vegas, celebrated with Chinese Sky Lanterns. Video: youtu.be/SNtwlBbBdb4?t=10 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  18269.  @cohendarwin5365  Western democracy is just procedural democracy. They spend time and money going through the motions of voting and elections, after which they call themselves a democracy just because they have completed these procedures.
    1
  18270. Britain had done much worst to China. During the 19th Century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything they had to offer, so the British waged two wars and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people.
    1
  18271. Britain did way more damage to China than the partition of India could ever make up for it.
    1
  18272. Britain did way worst to China than the partition of India could ever make up for it.
    1
  18273.  @elijahfreeman5299  The actual lesson is don't let yourself become a chess piece on the chess board between world powers. Zelenskyy experienced this firsthand when the Biden initially promised to support Ukraine "for as long as it takes." After the events of Oct 7, Biden now promises to support Ukraine "for as long as we can."
    1
  18274. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18275. Many in the Philippines and India tend to have "colonial mentality," thinking that Anglo-Saxon culture is inherently superior to other cultures (including their own). Colonizers not only colonized lands, but also the minds of the local people. Even after the colonizer left, the local people's minds remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters.
    1
  18276.  @xerozero976  You said: "Most big travel corporations are semi CCP mouthpiece…" I mean, that's because Chinese tourists are everywhere, everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending coin to stimulate your tourism industries. Travel corporations want to cater to this huge market and offer tours in Mandarin and organise Chinese tour groups. After all, China has the world's largest number of outbound tourists and travel corporations want a piece of the action. Source: China has the world's largest number of outbound tourists xinhuanet.com/english/2018-10/04/c_137511115.htm
    1
  18277.  @xerozero976  Which country is spreading bad rumours about China? US anti-China MSM is constantly painting China in a negative light and "demonising" our country yet you're accusing China of doing what the USA is doing?
    1
  18278.  @xerozero976  I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, and I was appalled at the sheer amount of American anti-China propaganda out there! Whenever I tried to bring up China's achievements under the communist party to Americans, many Americans just laughed at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill, or told me to "Go back to China if you like it there!"
    1
  18279.  @xerozero976  About Huawei intellectual property, Huawei holds 56,492 active patents on telecommunications, networking and other high-tech inventions worldwide, according to Anaqua, an intellectual property-management software firm. Source: latimes.com/business/la-fi-huawei-patents-telecom-20190614-story.html
    1
  18280.  @xerozero976  China applies for more patents than any other country in the world and we also have the world's largest number of granted patents, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators. Patent applications for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (1,542,002 patents) 2. United States (597,141 patents) 3. Japan (313,567 patents) 4. South Korea (209,992 patents) 5. European Patent Office (174,397 patents) 6. Germany (67,898 patents) ... Source: World Intellectual Property Indicators wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Indicators#Patents Patent grants for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (432,147 patents) 2. United States (307,759 patents) 3. Japan (194,525 patents) 4. European Patent Office (127,603 patents) 5. South Korea (119,012 patents) 6. Russian Federation (35,774 patents) ...
    1
  18281.  @xerozero976  You said "Nobody say good about the CCP…They don't like the CCP!" A long term study by Harvard University has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. Source: Harvard survey finds Chinese satisfaction with govt rises china.org.cn/china/2020-07/17/content_76281590.htm
    1
  18282.  @xerozero976  I gave you Harvard University study showing around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China, yet you just dismiss the Harvard survey, because you are biased against China that's all?
    1
  18283.  @xerozero976  Apart from patents, China publishes more research papers than any other in the world, over a wide range of topics such as physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences. Countries by published scientific papers in 2018: 1. China (528,263 articles) 2. United States (422,808 articles) 3. India (135,788 articles) 4. Germany (104,396 articles) 5. Japan (98,793 articles) 6. United Kingdom (97,681 articles) 7. Russia (81,579 8. Italy (71,240 articles) 9. South Korea (66,376 articles) ... Source: List of countries by number of scientific and technical journal articles wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_scientific_and_technical_journal_articles This shows that many Chinese scientist and researchers are making discoveries and publishing their findings, contributing to mankind's scientific advancements.
    1
  18284.  @xerozero976  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  18285.  @xerozero976  You said you have 10 years experience in China, well, which part of our vast country of China did you visit? Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors (just ask the expats) but many Westerners are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands with suspicion.
    1
  18286.  @xerozero976  You're blatantly biased against China, you said (and I quote your words) "China will never become a superpower over the USA!" because you care absolutely nothing for China's interests, nor do you actually want China to succeed. You said you have 10 years experience in China, well, which Chinese provinces did you visit in our vast country of China?
    1
  18287.  @xerozero976  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA. The test is given every three years to 15-year-olds around the world and measures their knowledge in reading, science and mathematics. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    1
  18288.  @xerozero976  China publishes more scientific research papers than any other country in the world. For the first time, China has overtaken the United States in terms of the total number of science publications, according to statistics compiled by the US National Science Foundation (NSF). Source: China declared world’s largest producer of scientific articles nature.com/articles/d41586-018-00927-4 The agency’s report, released on 18 January, documents the United States’ increasing competition from China and other developing countries that are stepping up their investments in science and technology.
    1
  18289.  @fcl3294  You can't refute my point about USA accusing China of potentially abusing the Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now scrapped) yet USA is abusing their extradition bill with Canada with Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou case, so you change the topic instead? Gui Minhai said that he had returned to mainland China and surrendered to the authorities of his own volition, he appeared to indicate that he was prepared to follow the course of justice in China, while waiving protection as a Swedish citizen.
    1
  18290.  @joannespluym6109  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18291.  @fcl3294  Murder? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. So which country is the real threat to global peace here?
    1
  18292.  @fcl3294  Every state has a National Security Law of its own, why can't China introduce the Hong Kong National Security Law? According to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 (香港基本法第二十三條) Hong Kong shall enact laws to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government, or theft of state secrets, to prohibit foreign political organizations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region, and to prohibit political organizations or bodies of the Region from establishing ties with foreign political organizations or bodies. So what's wrong with HK National Security Law? Even the USA is arresting those January 6th Capitol Hill insurrectionists using the US National Security Law, why can't China do the same for Hong Kong? … You said: "CCP apointed judges" The Trump nominated judge, Amy Coney Barrett, have been sworn into the US Supreme Court, in just weeks, setting a new record. Now it looks like Trump will have another supporter on the US Supreme Court in case he needs an ally during his legal battles.
    1
  18293.  @johanhirte9661  Every country has a National Security Law of their own. According to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 (香港基本法第二十三條) Hong Kong shall enact laws to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government, (Beijing) or theft of state secrets, to prohibit foreign political organizations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region, and to prohibit political organizations or bodies of the Region from establishing ties with foreign political organizations or bodies. So Beijing is merely doing what HKSAR was supposed to be doing all along, that is implementing a National Security Law.
    1
  18294.  @Shilanga-w2k  "神州 Shenzhou you agreed with a comment that was insulting," Look at the comment I agreed with. Andrew Chang wrote: "go to Hollywood and ask an AMerican to point out United States on a map" how was that insulting? All I did was link Jimmy Kimmel's interview, and near the end of that video, there was a little kid that could name many countries in the end, so how's that stereotyping? If anything, it sounds like you're the one stereotyping and you're just accusing me of what you're doing. I have shown a video evidence of at least some Americans being unable to point out countries on a map, but what you're describing is just anecdotal evidence that's all. I mean, did you literally give everyone you know a World Map and ask them to point out the countries? Otherwise, it's just your word only.
    1
  18295.  @blimpusa  His Chinese name was given by his Chinese wife, how's the Communist Party of China even involved in Cyrus' Chinese name?
    1
  18296. It's ironic how NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg accused China of prolonging the conflict in Ukraine by providing military aid to Russia (without proof). Yet it's NATO countries are sending military aid to Ukraine and prolonging the inevitable. And to top it all off, Ukraine is not even a member of NATO for crying out loud.
    1
  18297.  @zilun  Source: A New Jersey doctor is the first emergency physician to die from coronavirus in the US usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/04/02/coronavirus-first-emergency-doctor-dies-covid-19-us-nj/5110399002/
    1
  18298.  @floriankrause7203  So China ignored the first signs of the epidemic? Then why Italy had strange pneumonia cases in Lombardy, Italy since November 2019 long before the outbreak in Wuhan, China? Italy did not perform their own investigation in Lombardy on November 2019?
    1
  18299. Th captain of the ship has been dismissed from his position, just for informing the US government about Covid-19 infection on board the aircraft carrier. Video: U.S. Navy fires captain who sought help for virus-stricken ship youtu.be/Im18TI4uuWQ A possible punishment for whistle-blowing?
    1
  18300.  @floriankrause7203  So Lombardy, Italy had "strange pneumonia cases" on November 2019, so isn't there a possibility that Covid-19 was brought to China from Italy? Italy did not investigate the strange pneumonia cases in Lombardy, he just said it's on November 2019 so who knows, maybe Italy brought Covid-19 from Lombardy to Wuhan. Chinese scientists have investigated Wuhan and determined that Covid-19 did not originate in Wuhan. Source: Coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, Chinese scientists say scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3051981/coronavirus-did-not-originate-wuhan-seafood-market-chinese
    1
  18301.  @floriankrause7203  China broke 1000 confirmed cases at the end of January? Italy has the highest death toll in the world at over 14,000 deaths and Italy long surpassed China in infections and death. And about food production in China, China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. Source: Fishing Industry in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishing_industry_in_China China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_producing_countries_of_agricultural_commodities
    1
  18302.  @floriankrause7203  You clearly said that "there are lots of wild animals that are hunted rather than breed, like in Asia" so I am telling you that China home is the world's largest pig farms, sheep farms and duck farms, yet you still want to compare China's meat handling processing rules with the EU? Why don't you cite links to support your arguments, instead of telling me to check it out? And regarding hunting laws in the Europe, people still hunt for wild rabbits, catch them and eat them. According to the following source: Rabbit hunting is a tremendous amount of fun, and, of course, rabbits are one of the tastiest wild game meals to make an appearance on the dinner table. Hunting the Modern Cottontail Rabbit realtree.com/small-game-hunting/articles/hunting-the-modern-cottontail-rabbit People in the West still hunt game animals like quail, here's some tips on hunting quail. Hunting quail is a popular pastime. Many hunters go wild quail hunting because when cooked properly, they taste amazing. Source: How to hunt quail 101. wildernesstoday.com/quail-hunting/ So I can see in your words, the prejudice against Asian countries for hunting wild animals and eating them, when it is apparent that Western countries also hunt wild animals like rabbits and quail and consume them.
    1
  18303.  @christianmarriott3696  Hostility from China? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, shouldn't you from the United Kingdom, view the United States as a threat to global peace and stability here?
    1
  18304.  @matthewmartin7391  Take the unequal global distribution of Covid-19 vaccines for example. Because we live in a capitalistic world, the rich developed countries are buying up and hoarding the scarce Covid-19 vaccines, leaving little to no vaccines for the poorer developing nations. Take Canada for example, they pre-bought enough covid vaccines for 5-7 times their population! Imagine 1 Canadian having access to 5 vaccines, while elsewhere in the world, 10 Africans have to fight for access to 1 vaccine. Because under capitalism, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that scarce resources should be distributed according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" (German: Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen) Had we be living under true communism, then the vaccines would be allocated to those countries that urgently need it, such as the poorer developing nations. As Tedros Adhanom said, it's better to have some people in all countries vaccinated, than to have all people in some countries vaccinated.
    1
  18305.  @christianmarriott3696  "神州 Shenzhou I thought we were talking about Taiwan... You keep going off topic and constant criticism of USA is getting annoying.." We were, but you decided to make this about the USA when you keep on bringing up the U.S yet you're accusing me I of going off topic? And as far as I know, you're from the U.K not the U.S so why are you getting annoyed when I criticize the U.S? And the U.S's democratic experiment in Afghanistan has failed, after nearly 20 years and pouring trillions of dollars into Afghanistan, to replace the Taliban with the Taliban. The democratically elected Afghan President Ghani abandoned his country with carloads of U.S cash (because of corruption), and the 300,000-member strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban in weeks with minimal losses. If anything, this shows that you can't just force democracy onto a country and expect it to work. And what genocide are you talking about in China? Isn't China currently the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people? The U.S is committing genocide in the Middle East, just recently a U.S drone strike in Kabul killed 10 Afghan civilians (including women and children) and the U.S general responsible for ordering the attack was found not to have violated any laws, according to the Pentagon.
    1
  18306.  @matthewmartin7391  "神州 Shenzhou That hasn't rebutted anything I have said." Well, you never actually rebutted anything I said about Capitalism vs Communism, you just seemingly replaced it with your own straw-man argument. You said: "Communism is generally looked down upon by most due to what is the biggest hindrance to the system itself, Human Nature." That same statement can be applied to Capitalism as well, because Human Nature is clearly hindering the system and we've already quoted several examples, such the rich countries buying up and hoarding the Covid-19 vaccines and leaving little to none for the poorer developing countries. Isn't this a product of human nature as well? For example, didn't you complain about factories disappearing from the country and popping up in China? Isn't that a product of capitalism and of human nature?
    1
  18307.  @matthewmartin7391  Human societies has evolved from the slavery system (slave vs slave-owners) to the feudal system (serfs vs lords) and the newest iteration Capitalism hasn't changed the relationship between the classes, only giving them new terms, the Employee vs the Employer. The Employees have to contribute their time, effort and brainpower to the Employers, who'll then pay them a minimum wage, so that the employees can make a living. But this amount paid is surely less than the total time, energy and brainpower contributed by the employee, because otherwise the employer wouldn't pay the salary. Because the employer needs to make a profit, that's why they pay workers lower wages than the worker's actually contribution to the company. So if you as a worker, at the end of the day you feel as though you've been ripped off by your boss, you're absolutely right, and this phenonmena is called "labor exploitation". Furthermore, in the big corporations, all the big decisions of the companies (i.e what to produce, who to produce to, which direction to go, etc) are decided by a few members (namely the board of directors) instead of the vast number of employees in the corporation. Capitalism is where the employers seek to shrink worker wages as much as possible, in order to skim off a wider profit margin for themselves through private ownership of the means of production. It's just the nature of the beast, since capitalists continually need to make profits to avoid getting swallowed up by other capitalists. Communism believes that the proletariat (the working class) own the means of production, so that each person contributes and receives according to their ability and needs.
    1
  18308.  @matthewmartin7391  "神州 Shenzhou This type of gatekeeping of human innovation is apart of history for as long as we lived." If somehow by this statement, you think communists are inherently incapable of innovation, then there are examples to show otherwise. Take Russia for example, before the 1917 Communist Revolution, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe at that time, dominated 80% by peasants, whose traditional household economies were extremely inefficient compared to agriculture in Western Europe or the U.S. Only about 15%of the population lived in towns, and fewer than 10% worked in industry. Russia was technologically backwards compared to advanced capitalist countries like Great Britain and Germany. But after the 1917 Communist Revolution by the Bolsheviks, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe during it's heyday, both economically and militarily (that's why NATO was formed in response to Soviet Union's rising military might) The Soviet Union was the 2nd largest economy in the world after the USA from 1960 to 1990 according to Wikipedia: List of countries by largest historical GDP. The Soviet Union also made advancements in science and technology, they launched the world's first artificial satellite, Sputnik-1 in 1957. Such an ideology that transformed once arguably Europe's poorest country into it's strongest, and yet many Westerners hold a negative view of communism despite the promise and success it displayed.
    1
  18309.  @christianmarriott3696  You told me previously that you're from the United Kingdom, and not an American citizen yourself, yet why do you feel the need to come to America's defense?
    1
  18310.  @matthewmartin7391  "神州 Shenzhou Well the system that the russians had before was not capitalism." Well, you've just shown that Russia transformed from once arguably the weakest country in Europe, into it's strongest as the Soviet Union all without adopting capitalism. You said: "there was also widespread poverty and instability in the region," America also had poverty issues during the Cold War period, even President Johnson had announced a War on Poverty in 1960s, indicating the USA wasn't completely poverty free either, if there was need of such a poverty alleviation campaign in America at that time. You said: "I would say its pretty unfair to compare the soviet union to the west european countries as they suffered the brunt of the second world war interms of lose of critical infrastructure, which made them weak economically." In terms of total numbers, the Soviet Union bore an incredible brunt of casualties during WWII. An estimated 16,825,000 people died in the war, over 15% of its population. China also lost an astounding 20,000,000 people during the conflict.
    1
  18311.  @matthewmartin7391  That doesn't change the fact that it was the Communists that launched the world's first artificial satellite, Sputnik-1. And the Soviet space innovations did not end there, the first man in space was Soviet Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, and the first space station (of any sort) was the Soviet Salyut-1. If anything, it shows that a country run by a communist party is just as capable of innovating when necessary.
    1
  18312.  @matthewmartin7391  "神州 Shenzhou Communism sounds good in practice but it is not a good foundation to build a healthy economy off of." So if not a good foundation, would you be open to the concept of a country building it's foundation somewhere else, and then switching to communist/socialism ideology afterwards? "Eg, The Soviet Union (There was massive wealth inequality and corruption that was shown in the handling of east germany and themselves, poverty and human rights were all very stark issues in the USSR however this was not shown through government propaganda)" America had their War on Poverty campaign in 1960s, around the time of the Cold War period as well with the Soviet Union, indicating that poverty existed in America too. Also those problems like poverty and human rights violations can also be attributed to capitalist countries. Inequity is growing even in capitalist America today, USA has human rights violations like the most recent U.S drone strike in Kabul killing 10 Afghan civilians (including women and children) and the U.S General responsible for ordering the attack was found to have not violated any laws according to the Pentagon. I mean, these problems are common to both capitalist and socialist systems, but the fact remains that communist ideology transformed Europe's once arguably poorest country, into it's strongest as the Soviet Union during its heyday, yet the ideology of communism is seemingly demonized in the West, with most people unable to point out where exactly this demonization comes from.
    1
  18313.  @daviddoran3673  I showed people this short 3 min video:youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA of Urumiq, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang!
    1
  18314.  @normal_norm2627  Wumao (五毛) simply means 50 Cents. It refers to people who shill for China's government, supposedly being paid 50c per post on social websites.
    1
  18315. taniela Loketi Professor Zhang Weiwei (left side) sounds optimistic whereas Professor Zhang Lifen (right side) sounds pessimistic.
    1
  18316.  @tanielaloketi3538  Since when did USA take China as a friend? Just look at the sheer amount of anti-China vitriol spewed by American media.
    1
  18317.  @tanielaloketi3538  The Chinese government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and halt production, closing tourist attractions, imposing lockdown, banning mass gatherings, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and contain the virus. Now it's finally paying off that the virus is under control in China and we are cautiously reopening our economy. Video: Let Wuhan's sacrifice not be in vain youtu.be/YH6JjdANIPY But in Western countries like US and UK, their economies are far too precious to sacrifice so human health has to be sacrificed instead. Donald Trump wants to reopen the economy by Easter and Boris Johnson is relying on "herd immunity" to the pull through. So human lives have to be sacrificed instead of the economy.
    1
  18318. Ukraine is but a chess piece on the board between world powers.
    1
  18319.  @Ocelot  Those two cities? How many factories are there in those two cities alone? You really make it sound as though it's easy to pick out the illegal CFC emitters like it's a piece of cake. And NASA has revealed that the ozone layer hole is closing up, so what seems to be the problem then?
    1
  18320. After WW2, there should be no more wars, but then Cold War erupted between Soviet Union and USA, with proxy wars fought in Vietnam and Korea. After USSR dissolution, there should be no more wars, but USA still have Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, etc, even into 21st century. In my opinion, the American soldiers should be fighting to defend their country and dying on their own soil, instead of in Vietnam or Korea or Afghanistan or Iraq, so why do they travel across the Pacific ocean to fight wars in other countries lands? The US wars in Middle East cost estimated $4 trillion dollars of US taxpayers money. For comparison, China owns about $1 trillion dollars of US debt, so it is clear that US pumps a lot of money into waging wars halfway across the globe.The closest that the US mainland comes to being threatened was during the Cuban missile crisis, but America today has not been in danger since. Even North Korean knows that it will be annihilated if its missiles ever strike American property and personnel, so why is there need to resort to provocative actions in Korean peninsula?
    1
  18321. "Politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed." -Mao Zedong
    1
  18322. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18323. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18324. German Chancellor Merkel served her 4th terms while President Xi is only entering his 3rd term.
    1
  18325. President Xi Jinping is entering his 3rd term, but German Chancellor Angela Merkel served her 4th term.
    1
  18326. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18327. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China...
    1
  18328. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China............
    1
  18329. German Chancellor Merkel served 4th terms, while President Xi is only entering his 3rd.
    1
  18330.  @MarkYeung1  Good News, the U.S Secretary of State, Anthony Blinken has clarified that America does not support Taiwan independence, and the U.S State Department has restored a line to say U.S does not support independence for the island. It's careless remarks like those by Joe Biden that creates misunderstandings and could potentially trigger war.
    1
  18331.  @MarkYeung1  Good News. Anthony Blinken has clarified in a statement that America does not support Taiwan independence, and that U.S State Department has restored a line saying that it does not support the island's independence. It's because of careless remarks from leaders like Joe Biden, that create misunderstanding and could become a potential trigger.
    1
  18332. Facebook could be one of the worst creations of the Internet affecting our youth today. There's even a Chinese joke, that the name Facebook sounds like fēisǐ bùkě (非死不可) in Mandarin, which translates to "Must Die!" or "Have to Die!".
    1
  18333. The U.S maintains control over other countries by creating groupings like NATO, 5 Eyes, AUKUS, and the Quad, to keep member countries within the U.S orbit.
    1
  18334.  @tommohsien888  "while ignoring UN tribunal decision isn't hypocracy?" Who said it was a UN tribunal in the first place? It was the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) that ruled on the South China Sea, but the PCA isn't an official UN agency it only shares the same office space in the Hague as the ICJ. Since the ruling was made by a non-official UN agency, China reserves the right not to adhere to its ruling.
    1
  18335.  @gustavusadolphus1714  "das kapital or communist manifesto? Choose 1 garbage." Both are highly reputable books. Das Kapital is the most cited book in the social sciences published before 1950 and the Manifesto remains one of the world's most influential political documents.
    1
  18336.  @LiterallyMe2022  Lol, even Taiwan doesn't respect the South China Sea ruling, calling it "completely unacceptable" and that the tribunal’s decisions have no legally binding force on its government.
    1
  18337.  @Leevancliff-v8z  "Shenzhou. To deter the bully of the Philippines sea" There is no internationally recognized "Philippines Sea", but everyone knows it as the South China Sea. Also, haven't you heard of Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident where a Taiwanese boat tried to ram a Philippines Coastguard and in response, the coastguard open fired and killed 65-year old Taiwanese Hong Shicheng (洪石成)?
    1
  18338.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "Shenzhou. it's a common mistake with the ICJ/PCA thing, which is why I put "The Hague" first." You yourself made a mistake over the ICJ/PCA, yet instead of straight up apologising for it, you just decide to stop the debate on that, and instead demand someone to recommend a book? It just shows that you didn't read books yourself in the first place. "It's also pretty common that news, etc use "The Hague" over PCA." Because the news is trying to make people like you think it was the ICJ that made the ruling on the South China Sea, so they constantly refer to it as "international tribunal in the Hague". But since it's been shown that it was the PCA that did the ruling, then the PCA is NOT the ICJ and therefore, PCA doesn't have the same level of jurisdiction over territorial sovereignty as the ICJ. "You seem to have a bit of problem with your English understanding, it ain't your first language?" So you're now resorting to mocking my level of English proficiency? When you're the one who confused the PCA with the ICJ in the Hague in the first place?
    1
  18339.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "Well you can keep digging the long history British/France/Spain/Portugal/USA/etc colonisation and all the wrongs then]" Philippines was once an Spanish colony then an American colony next right? That explains why many Filipinos tend to suffer from colonial mentality. Colonial mentality is the internalized perception of ethnic or cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization. The colonizer not only colonized the land, but they also colonized the minds of the local people as well, through cultural education and education system. Even after the colonizers left, the minds of many of the locals remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. "So if China wants to use the "long history" to claim 10 dash lines," The 11 Dash Line was published by the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (now Taiwan) in 1947, which is just 2 years after WWII, how's that ancient history? And even till today, Taiwan maintains the claim to the 11 Dash Line, so are you saying the Philippines support Taiwan's claim over the South China Sea? "Maybe go make your own China's www/internet while you are at it and stop using the "western's www/internet" Since when does the Internet belong only to the West?
    1
  18340.  @Dragon-g9k7v  说实话翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18341. 说实话翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18342.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "Shenzhou. It's one thing to keep mum about what the island will be and it's another to tell the world it WON'T be militarized." President Xi Jinping told former President Obama that the South China Sea Islands won't be militarized if US would stop sending warships to the South China Seas and intrude on China's territorial waters in say the Paracel Islands. But year after year, the US continues to send warships into within 12 Nautical Miles of the Paracel Islands. 2023: The USS Hopper sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2022: The USS Benfold sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2021: The USS John S McCain sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2020: The USS Mustin sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2019: The USS Wayne E. Meyer sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2018: The USS Higgins and USS Antietam sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2017: The USS Chafee sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. ... Since the US did not uphold their end of the promise, that's why China had to militarize those islands to protect our sovereignty.
    1
  18343.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "Shenzhou. It's one thing to keep mum about what the island will be and it's another to tell the world it WON'T be militarized." President Xi Jinping told former President Obama that the South China Sea Islands won't be militarized if US would stop sending warships to the South China Seas and intrude on China's territorial waters in say the Paracel Islands. But year after year, the US continues to send warships into within 12 Nautical Miles of the Paracel Islands. 2023: The USS Hopper sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2022: The USS Benfold sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2021: The USS John S McCain sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2020: The USS Mustin sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2019: The USS Wayne E. Meyer sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2018: The USS Higgins and USS Antietam sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2017: The USS Chafee sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. ... Since the US did not uphold their end, China had no choice but to militarize those islands to protect our sovereignty.
    1
  18344.  @Leevancliff-v8z  Taiwan claims a larger territorial swath of the South China Sea through the 11 Dash-Line, compared to mainland China's 9 or 10 Dash Line, so are you claiming Philippines supports Taiwan's claim to the South China Sea?
    1
  18345.  @rafaelteodosio7637  1. According to The Diplomat: Who Supports China in the South China Sea and Why at least 70 countries support China's position on the South China Sea, compared to just 5-7 countries that support Philippines position. Even Taiwan island (i.e ROC) doesn't accept the 2016 South China Sea arbitration, calling it "completely unacceptable" and "non-legally binding." 2. Have Filipinos forgotten about the American-Philippines War in sadly, which over 250,000 Filipino civilians died while fighting against the Americans? Why then would Philippines want to allow the US to use them as a strategic place in a potential conflict over Taiwan? What's Taiwan to Philippines that they would go to war over it? 3. Philippines acknowledges the One China policy that Taiwan is a province of China, then how could Philippines congratulate them? How would Philippines feel if China congratulated the leader of the Federal Republic of Mindanao?
    1
  18346.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "I'm not ignoring those, I'm just too busy to double check it." So you're too busy to look up facts, then why are you demanding that someone look up recommend a book? And since we've shown that the PCA is not an official UN agency (unlike the ICJ) then China reserves the right not to adhere to its ruling after all. "The first 3 are in the 80s and the last 2 are in the 2000s. Times are quite different with those 2 "eras"." Who are you to decide which years constitute an era? If you're against China's building bases in the South China sea in the 2000s, then why you forgive Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia, etc, building bases much earlier than China?
    1
  18347.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "So far it's been CCP that's been barking and whining everywhere." So when mainland China doesn't accept the South China Sea arbitration, you mock China, but when Taiwan's government also doesn't accept the arbitration (calling it "completely unacceptable" and "non-legally binding") you just look the other way? Why you bring up the 2016 arbitration at all then if you don't want to be fair in how countries/states react to the ruling?
    1
  18348.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "What is China to you? Why do you want to go to "war" with so many people here." China is my home country as well as the world's 2nd largest economy (or largest by GDP PPP) so if China goes to war, lots of people will die, as well as causing the global economy to collapse. Yet what is Taiwan to the Philippines that they would risk WW3 by allowing US bases to station on their land? Did the Filipinos forgotten about the American-Philippine War?
    1
  18349.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "Just like China loves to say to US, "mind your own business and don't go poking into other's internal affairs" Then why is Philippines poking into China's internal affair with Taiwan? Philippines is the one not respecting China's internal affairs, by congratulating Taiwan. How would Philippines feel if China congratulated the Federal Republic of Mindanao?
    1
  18350.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "Guess what, we don't see Taiwan's ship ram-ing others" Haven't you heard of Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident where a Taiwanese boat tried to ram a Philippines Coastguard and in response, the coastguard open fired and shot to death a 65-year old Taiwanese Hong Shicheng (洪石成)? First you mistake the PCA for the ICJ, now you're turning a blind eye to Taiwan's actions?
    1
  18351.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "Shenzhou. Looks like your being gang up." He is not exactly being ganged up. He pretty much asked for it by commenting on most people's comment" Can't I present my point of view here? I use facts in my argument, yet many others here don't even bother to do research and then gang up on me just because my views differ from theirs?
    1
  18352.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "I kinda missed the "old" China, they weren't as "rich" as now and way less arrogant." So you're saying that you wish China would remain a poor country forever and never develop into the economic powerhouse that it is today?
    1
  18353.  @Dragon-g9k7v  It was Taiwan that first claimed the South China Sea by publishing the 11 Dash Line in 1947, back when it was still the Nationalist government of the Republic of China 🇹🇼 . The People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 came about later in 1949, after the ROC government fled the mainland to Taiwan. PRC modified the map to the 9 Dash Line, while Taiwan today maintains the claim to the 11 Dash Line. So how is Taiwan not arrogant? Had the Taiwan government remained in power in the mainland, it's highly likely that they would retain the claim to the South China Sea (as they still do today). Taiwan also rejected the 2016 South China Sea tribunal ruling, calling it "completely unacceptable" and "non-legally binding" so how is this not an example of Taiwan's arrogance?
    1
  18354.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "Don't forget that it was the opening up that made China richer, if China stuck to what they were doing all along, they would not had been rich." I don't understand, what has this even got to do with the discussion at all? China's opening up was made under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, so it shows that China's government is flexible enough to make changes when necessary in order to facilitate economic growth. On one hand, you talk about Taiwan becoming rich, but when mainland China does the same thing, you somehow imply that it's not Chinese government's own doing?
    1
  18355.  @uyenlopez539  "Shenzhou. But china is also a signatory party in the permanent court of arbitration." China had declared that it would not participate in the arbitration. In 2006, China made a declaration in accordance with Article 298 of Section 3 of UNCLOS, not to submit to third party arbitration regarding sovereignty disputes. Many countries including the United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, France, Canada, and Spain had made similar declarations not to accept third party arbitration, therefore China reserves the right not to adhere to the PCA's South China Sea ruling.
    1
  18356.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "Whatever Taiwan did, China/CCP doesn't have to follow right?" That's right. That's why mainland China adopted the 9 Dash Line instead of the 11 Dash Line that's claimed by Taiwan island even till today. "Don't keep making me repeat this.... TW have NOT been whining about it nor have they been sending ships ram-ing others or using water cannon." How many time's have I repeated the example of Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident where a Taiwanese boat tried to ram a Philippines Coastguard and in response, the coastguard open fired and shot to death a 65-year old Taiwanese Hong Shicheng (洪石成)? And the fact remains that Taiwan also rejected the 2016 South China Sea tribunal ruling, calling it "completely unacceptable" and "non-legally binding" so how is this not an example of Taiwan whining about it?
    1
  18357.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "What a joke. It's such a hypothetical thing and even if they were still ruling, there are SO MANY things that can happen that will change the outcome." That's why I wrote "highly likely" and the reason is because even after fleeing to Taiwan, the Taiwan government still maintains the claim to the 11 Dash Line even after losing all their power in the mainland. So why is my hypothesis a joke, when the fact is that Taiwan has never given up on its 11 Dash Line claim? You said: "no one will even remotely expect TW to become such a democratic country like they are today." Taiwan is not a country though, they still call themselves Republic of China 🇹🇼 meaning that they claim to be the same country as China (PRC 🇨🇳) Also, even after becoming democratic, Taiwan still maintains the claim to the 11 Dash Line, and Taiwan also rejected the 2016 arbitral ruling. So had Taiwan government retained in power in the mainland, it's highly likely that they will continue to maintain this claim (as they do till today).
    1
  18358.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "We know for a fact that Taiwan is NOT acting like a bully in SCS while having claims to it, just like the many other countries, Viet, MY, PH, Brunei, JP, etc [not gonna list them all]." You mentioned JP as in Japan right? Japan is NOT a claimant to the South China Sea, why are you including Japan in it? Also Taiwan is not a country, they claim to be Republic of China 🇹🇼 and since you accept Taiwan's 11 Dash Line claim, then can't PRC 🇨🇳 claim the 9 Dash Line as well? You said: "ONLY 1 country, China/CCP is acting like a bully." Indonesia has been exploding fisherman's boats that they confiscated, destroying fisherman's livelihoods how's that not an example of a bully? As I mentioned in the example of Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident, a Taiwanese boat tried to ram a Philippines Coastguard and in response, the coastguard open fired and shot to death a 65-year old Taiwanese Hong Shicheng (洪石成). How are these not examples of bullying given that they result in loss of life and fishermen's vessels? You said: "If you know what is a proper aircraft intercept [mind you, China/CCP is doing a very bad job at this even though it's pretty simple], China/CCP could EASILY do that with the ships in SCS" The People's Liberation Army Air Force has performed over 180 successful aircraft intercepts over the past two years in its efforts to defend China's airspace. You said: "WITHOUT having to ram or use water cannon" Chinese ships were subjected to more than 1,400 ramming raids by Vietnamese ships and in response the Chinese ships fired water cannons at those Vietnamese vessels. Also, China is just firing water cannons, while other countries coastguard have open fired on Chinese vessels like the Phillippine Coastguard in Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident.
    1
  18359.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "NOPE, on the contrary, it's is HIGHLY UNLIKELY. Once again you seem to fail to understand why I said "butterfly effect". "1 drop of change"" Explain where's this 1 drop of change going to come from? Since clearly there's no external stimulus to change their stance towards maintaining the claiming 11 Dash Line even after fleeing to Taiwan, then it's highly likely Taiwan would retain this claim (as they do today) had they remain in the mainland. Where's your 1 drop of change going to come from? "ESPECIALLY looking at what TW had been doing since KMT escaped to TW island till now." Taiwan still maintains the claim to 11 Dash Line, and their government also rejected the 2016 arbitration ruling, even after escaping to Taiwan island, so again where's this 1 drop of change going to come from? You talk about some obscure small possibility, whereas I've stated that its highly likely Taiwan will retain its claim had it remain in the mainland. KMT remaining in the mainland would have even less pressure and external stimulus to change their position regarding South China Sea. "What a joke this is. Let's put it this way, IF CCP is NOT threatening war for TW to be officially independent. They MAY have done it for official sake." Now you're using MAY? As in a "possibility"? Why haven't they not done so then? If TW cannot officially declare independence, then the simple reality is that TW is not independent after all, since they can't declare it as such. If you're claiming it is, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? What's preventing TW from doing so? "EVERYTHING in TAIWAN IS INDEPENDENT, own currency, Government, military, culture, etc." Hong Kong has their own currency, their own government, their own passport, etc, yet Hong Kong is recognized as part of China (since the 1997 HK handover). So having those things doesn't necessary equal to being an independent country, since Taiwan still goes by the name ROC. "Just like India have the other name which they use interchangeably," India is an independent country that's right. But Taiwan isn't, since even India recognizes the One China policy that TW is part of China. "CCP had NEVER conquered or OWN the TW island," Yet why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? What's preventing TW from doing so? The fact is that the CPC exerts control over TW island and prevent it from joining the UN, therefore, the island isn't independent after all. "TW may or may not still claim that BUT they don't send ships harassing others in SCS " How many time's have I repeated the example of Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident where a Taiwanese boat tried to ram a Philippines Coastguard and in response, the coastguard open fired and shot to death a 65-year old Taiwanese Hong Shicheng (洪石成)? "ONCE AGAIN don't circle back to the TW-PH ship accident, we've covered everything about it already," We haven't. This is the first time you actually acknowledge the incident, and the fact is that Taiwan boat tried to ram a PH coastguard. So why do you keep claiming that Taiwan ships don't ram others? "Looking at what TW did in the past till now and the "butterfly effect", it's a straight up NO" Again, where's this 1 drop of change going to come from? Even though Taiwan changed to a democracy, they still retain the claim to 11 Dash Line as well as rejecting the 2016 arbitration. You're banking so much change on the slim possibility of 1 drop of change that's all, whereas the default stance of Taiwan is to maintain its claim even after KMT fled to TW island. "How about this, you go and tell the CCP to give up power, let Taiwan TAKE BACK the mainland [current China]," The communists fought long and hard to retain control over China and chase the KMT out of the mainland to TW island why would the CPC just relinquish control? How about you tell Taiwan to allow reunification? "IF TW does what you said they would, I'll apologise." Will TW relinquish the mainland back to the communists if it turns out that they retain the claim to the 11 Dash Line?
    1
  18360.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "so far I did NOT say I accept TW's claim of "11 dash lines". I neither agree nor disagree with TW's claim in SCS." So if you neither agree nor disagree with Taiwan 11 Dash Line claims, then why can't you hold the same position for mainland China's 9 Dash Line? Taiwan claims an even larger swath over the South China Sea, so if you neither agree nor disagree, then why can't you do the same for mainland China's smaller claim? "Since TW is not forcing it [use of force] and willing to negotiate about it" Since when is Taiwan willing to negotiate about it? Taiwan clearly rejected the 2016 arbitration ruling, calling it "completely unacceptable" and "legally non-binding" then isn't it clear that it's not up for negotiation? "Go read the above many times, enough times for you to remember and understand it." The fact remains that China is a late-comer to the South China Sea claims, then if you can tolerate Vietnam and Philippines claims then why not China? Scale and speed has little to do with it, given enough time and resources, Vietnam and Philippines can also construct just as many islands as China. I mean could you tell me what's the "acceptable speed" of island construction then? An artificial island IS an artificial island, no matter whether it's built slow or fast. "You wanted a UN "thing", there you go "United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)"." UNCLOS is a set of rules, it depends on who's making the ruling. And the PCA is NOT an official UN agency. In fact your source deliberately doesn't even mention PCA, it just calls it "an arbitration tribunal" and "The tribunal" because they don't want to expose the fact that it wasn't an official UN agency (i.e the ICJ) that's conducting the ruling. ""Taiwan stated that they did not recognize the tribunal and insisted that the matter should be resolved through bilateral negotiations with other claimants." See this, BILATERAL NEGOTIATIONS" Why didn't you quote the whole sentence? The whole sentence is "Both the People's Republic of China and Taiwan stated that they did not recognize the tribunal and insisted that the matter should be resolved through bilateral negotiations with other claimants." Yet you deliberately left out China? "If Indo does that and it's wrong, CCP doing it makes it right? Besides CCP is doing it on a worst scale." Since when is CPC exploding fisherman's boats that were confiscated? And on a worst scale than Indonesia too? "ONCE AGAIN, how many times did Indo did what you've said and how many times CCP had done it" 2016: Indonesia blows up 23 foreign fishing boats to send a message. 2017: Indonesia blew up and sank 81 more fishing boats. ... A total of 488 ships have been blown up by Indonesia. More than half the boats — 276 — are from Vietnam, followed by vessels from the Philippines (90), Thailand (50), and Malaysia (41). How many times China has exploded boats? Zero. "Go read "Hainan Island incident", fighter jets are way more maneuverable than that signals intelligence aircraft. EVEN IF the US aircraft wants to crash into the fighter jet, it would FAIL terribly." Why on Earth are US intelligence aircraft flying over the Chinese territory of Hainan Island in the first place? Theses are specifically "reconnaissance planes" sent to spy on other country's territory, yet instead of making noise over it you are degrading the People's Liberation Army Air Force's successful repelling of these foreign aircraft? "Plainly FASLE. Go google it" I did. NBC, BBC, and Al Jazeera reported that Vietnamese vessels ram China ships 1400 times. "If you don't have another other case than "Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident" which happened in 2013, more than 10 years now." The fact that the incident occurred shows that Taiwan vessels had tried to ram other ships, so all your claims about them not doing is plainly FASLE.
    1
  18361.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "NOPE, on the contrary, it's is HIGHLY UNLIKELY. Once again you seem to fail to understand why I said "butterfly effect". "1 drop of change"" Explain where's this 1 drop of change going to come from? Since clearly there's no external stimulus to change their stance towards maintaining the claiming 11 Dash Line even after fleeing to Taiwan, then it's highly likely Taiwan would retain this claim (as they do today) had they remain in the mainland. Where's your 1 drop of change going to come from? "ESPECIALLY looking at what TW had been doing since KMT escaped to TW island till now." Taiwan still maintains the claim to 11 Dash Line, and their government also rejected the 2016 arbitration ruling, even after escaping to Taiwan island, so again where's this 1 drop of change going to come from? You talk about some obscure small possibility, whereas I've stated that its highly likely Taiwan will retain its claim had it remain in the mainland. KMT remaining in the mainland would have even less pressure and external stimulus to change their position regarding South China Sea. "What a joke this is. Let's put it this way, IF CCP is NOT threatening war for TW to be officially independent. They MAY have done it for official sake." Now you're using MAY? As in a "possibility"? Why haven't they not done so then? If TW cannot officially declare independence, then the simple reality is that TW is not independent after all, since they can't declare it as such. If you're claiming it is, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? What's preventing TW from doing so? "EVERYTHING in TAIWAN IS INDEPENDENT, own currency, Government, military, culture, etc." Hong Kong has their own currency, their own government, their own passport, etc, yet Hong Kong is recognized as part of China (since the 1997 HK handover). So having those things doesn't necessary equal to being an independent country, since Taiwan still goes by the name ROC. "Just like India have the other name which they use interchangeably," India is an independent country that's right. But Taiwan isn't, since even India recognizes the One China policy that TW is part of China. "CCP had NEVER conquered or OWN the TW island," Yet why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? What's preventing TW from doing so? The fact is that the CPC exerts control over TW island and prevent it from joining the UN, therefore, the island isn't independent after all. "TW may or may not still claim that BUT they don't send ships harassing others in SCS " How many time's have I repeated the example of Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident where a Taiwanese boat tried to ram a Philippines Coastguard and in response, the coastguard open fired and shot to death a 65-year old Taiwanese Hong Shicheng (洪石成)? "ONCE AGAIN don't circle back to the TW-PH ship accident, we've covered everything about it already," We haven't. This is the first time you actually acknowledge the incident, and the fact is that Taiwan boat tried to ram a PH coastguard. So why do you keep claiming that Taiwan ships don't ram others? "Looking at what TW did in the past till now and the "butterfly effect", it's a straight up NO" Again, where's this 1 drop of change going to come from? Even though Taiwan changed to a democracy, they still retain the claim to 11 Dash Line as well as rejecting the 2016 arbitration. You're banking so much change on the slim possibility of 1 drop of change that's all, whereas the default stance of Taiwan is to maintain its claim even after KMT fled to TW island. "How about this, you go and tell the CCP to give up power, let Taiwan TAKE BACK the mainland [current China]," The CPC fought long and hard to retain control over China and chase the KMT out of the mainland to TW island why would the CPC just relinquish control? How about you tell Taiwan to allow reunification? "IF TW does what you said they would, I'll apologise." Will TW relinquish the mainland back to the CPC if it turns out that they retain the claim to the 11 Dash Line?
    1
  18362.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "NOPE, on the contrary, it's is HIGHLY UNLIKELY. Once again you seem to fail to understand why I said "butterfly effect". "1 drop of change"" Explain where's this 1 drop of change going to come from? Since clearly there's no external stimulus to change their stance towards maintaining the claiming 11 Dash Line even after fleeing to Taiwan, then it's highly likely Taiwan would retain this claim (as they do today) had they remain in the mainland. Where's your 1 drop of change going to come from? "ESPECIALLY looking at what TW had been doing since KMT escaped to TW island till now." Taiwan still maintains the claim to 11 Dash Line, and their government also rejected the 2016 arbitration ruling, even after escaping to Taiwan island, so again where's this 1 drop of change going to come from? You talk about some obscure small possibility, whereas I've stated that its highly likely Taiwan will retain its claim had it remain in the mainland. KMT remaining in the mainland would have even less pressure and external stimulus to change their position regarding South China Sea. "What a joke this is. Let's put it this way, IF CCP is NOT threatening war for TW to be officially independent. They MAY have done it for official sake." Now you're using MAY? As in a "possibility"? Why haven't they not done so then? If TW cannot officially declare independence, then the simple reality is that TW is not independent after all, since they can't declare it as such. If you're claiming it is, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? What's preventing TW from doing so? "EVERYTHING in TAIWAN IS INDEPENDENT, own currency, Government, military, culture, etc." Hong Kong has their own currency, their own government, their own passport, etc, yet Hong Kong is recognized as part of China (since the 1997 HK handover). So having those things doesn't necessary equal to being an independent country, since Taiwan still goes by the name ROC. "Just like India have the other name which they use interchangeably," India is an independent country. But Taiwan isn't, since even India recognizes the One China policy that TW is part of China.
    1
  18363.  @Dragon-g9k7v  Explain where's this 1 drop of change going to come from? Since clearly there's no external stimulus to change their stance towards maintaining the claiming 11 Dash Line even after fleeing to Taiwan, then it's highly likely Taiwan would retain this claim (as they do today) had they remain in the mainland. Where's your 1 drop of change going to come from? "ESPECIALLY looking at what TW had been doing since KMT escaped to TW island till now." Taiwan still maintains the claim to 11 Dash Line, and their government also rejected the 2016 arbitration ruling, even after escaping to Taiwan island, so again where's this 1 drop of change going to come from? You talk about some obscure small possibility, whereas I've stated that its highly likely Taiwan will retain its claim had it remain in the mainland. KMT remaining in the mainland would have even less pressure and external stimulus to change their position regarding South China Sea. "What a joke this is. Let's put it this way, IF CCP is NOT threatening war for TW to be officially independent. They MAY have done it for official sake." Now you're using MAY? As in a "possibility"? Why haven't they not done so then? If TW cannot officially declare independence, then the simple reality is that TW is not independent after all, since they can't declare it as such. If you're claiming it is, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? What's preventing TW from doing so? "EVERYTHING in TAIWAN IS INDEPENDENT, own currency, Government, military, culture, etc." Hong Kong has their own currency, their own government, their own passport, etc, yet Hong Kong is recognized as part of China (since the 1997 HK handover). So having those things doesn't necessary equal to being an independent country, since Taiwan still goes by the name ROC. "Just like India have the other name which they use interchangeably," India is an independent country that's right. But Taiwan isn't, since even India recognizes the One China policy that TW is part of China. "CCP had NEVER conquered or OWN the TW island," Yet why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? What's preventing TW from doing so? The fact is that the CPC exerts control over TW island and prevent it from joining the UN, therefore, the island isn't independent after all. "TW may or may not still claim that BUT they don't send ships harassing others in SCS " How many time's have I repeated the example of Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident where a Taiwanese boat tried to ram a Philippines Coastguard and in response, the coastguard open fired and shot to death a 65-year old Taiwanese Hong Shicheng (洪石成)? "ONCE AGAIN don't circle back to the TW-PH ship accident, we've covered everything about it already," We haven't. This is the first time you actually acknowledge the incident, and the fact is that Taiwan boat tried to ram a PH coastguard. So why do you keep claiming that Taiwan ships don't ram others? "Looking at what TW did in the past till now and the "butterfly effect", it's a straight up NO" Again, where's this 1 drop of change going to come from? Even though Taiwan changed to a democracy, they still retain the claim to 11 Dash Line as well as rejecting the 2016 arbitration. You're banking so much change on the slim possibility of 1 drop of change that's all, whereas the default stance of Taiwan is to maintain its claim even after KMT fled to TW island. "How about this, you go and tell the CCP to give up power, let Taiwan TAKE BACK the mainland [current China]," The communists fought long and hard to retain control over China and chase the KMT out of the mainland to TW island why would the CPC just relinquish control? How about you tell Taiwan to allow reunification? "IF TW does what you said they would, I'll apologise." Will TW relinquish the mainland back to the communists if it turns out that they retain the claim to the 11 Dash Line?
    1
  18364.  @Dragon-g9k7v  Explain where's this 1 drop of change going to come from? Even losing all their power in the mainland and fleeing to Taiwan island, Taiwan still maintain the claim to the 11 Dash Line. then it's highly likely Taiwan would retain this claim (as they do today) had they remain in the mainland. Where's your 1 drop of change going to come from? "ESPECIALLY looking at what TW had been doing since KMT escaped to TW island till now." Taiwan still maintains the claim to 11 Dash Line, and their government also rejected the 2016 arbitration ruling, even after escaping to Taiwan island, so again where's this 1 drop of change going to come from? You talk about some obscure small possibility, but even with the big change of losing the mainland, Taiwan still maintains the claim to the 11 Dash Line. "What a joke this is. Let's put it this way, IF CCP is NOT threatening war for TW to be officially independent. They MAY have done it for official sake." Now you're using MAY? As in a "possibility"? Why haven't they not done so then? If TW cannot officially declare independence, then the simple reality is that TW is not independent after all, since they can't declare it as such. "EVERYTHING in TAIWAN IS INDEPENDENT, own currency, Government, military, culture, etc." Hong Kong has their own currency, their own government, their own passport, etc, yet Hong Kong is recognized as part of China (since the 1997 HK handover). So having those things doesn't necessary equal to being an independent country, since Taiwan still goes by the name ROC. "Just like India have the other name which they use interchangeably," India is an independent country that's right. But Taiwan isn't, since even India recognizes the One China policy that TW is part of China. "CCP had NEVER conquered or OWN the TW island," If that's that case then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? What's preventing TW from doing so? The fact is that the CPC exerts control over TW island and prevent it from joining the UN, therefore, the island isn't independent after all.
    1
  18365.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "NOPE, on the contrary, it's is HIGHLY UNLIKELY. Once again you seem to fail to understand why I said "butterfly effect". "1 drop of change"" It's this 1 drop of change is that's HIGHLY UNLIKELY. Where's this drop of change going to come from? If such a big change of losing the mainland and fleeing to TW island failed to change their 11 Dash Line stance, then where's this 1 drop of change going to come from? "What a joke this is. Let's put it this way, IF CCP is NOT threatening war for TW to be officially independent. They MAY have done it for official sake." MAY? As in only a "possibility"? Then the fact remains that TW is not an independent country after all, since they can't even declare independence. "EVERYTHING in TAIWAN IS INDEPENDENT, own currency, Government, military, culture, etc" Hong Kong has their own government, own currency, own passport, etc, yet Hong Kong is part of China. Having those doesn't necessarily mean independence, since China allows multiple systems to exist within its borders. "Taiwan still goes by the name ROC/Taiwan but mostly using Taiwan now." No. Even in the Olympics, Taiwan athletes can only compete under the name "Chinese Taipei" so how's that for independence? "Just like India have the other name which they use interchangeably, most of their locals know and use it as well." Locals may call India Bharat or other names, but those are words used locally. Internationally, India is known as Republic of India. Just like Taiwan is known internationally as Republic of China. "Once again, repeating myself here, TW may or may not still claim that BUT they don't send ships harassing others in SCS" How does this answer to the fact that "even after becoming democratic, Taiwan still maintains the claim to the 11 Dash Line"? Also, haven't you heard of Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident? "ONCE AGAIN don't circle back to the TW-PH ship accident, we've covered everything about it already," No we haven't. This is the first time you actually acknowledged the incident. The fact is that Taiwan vessel had attempted to ram a Philippine coastguard proves your statement that Taiwan doesn't ram others as plainly false. "Looking at what TW did in the past till now and the "butterfly effect", it's a straight up NO!!!. The likelihood of that happening is extremely close to ZERO [nothing is absolute zero %]." Where's your 1 drop of change going to come from? Taiwan experienced massive change when they fled the mainland to TW island, but they refuse to give up on their 11 Dash Claim, how can you claim some small drop of change is going to appear and change what a big change failed to do? "How about this, you go and tell the CCP to give up power, let Taiwan TAKE BACK the mainland" The CPC fought long and hard for the right to rule China and to chase KMT to TW island, why should CPC give up something fought so hard for? The CPC earned their right to rule the mainland. "IF TW does what you said they would, I'll apologise." Will TW be willing to relinquish control of the mainland back to CPC if you apologise?
    1
  18366.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "so far I did NOT say I accept TW's claim of "11 dash lines". I neither agree nor disagree with TW's claim in SCS." Yet when mainland China claims the 9 Dash Line, you disagree? Taiwan claims a larger area (11 Dash Line) and if you neither agree nor disagree, then you should apply the same position towards China's smaller claim. It's only fair that you treat both the same. "Go read the above many times, enough times for you to remember and understand it." The fact remains that Vietnam and Philippines were building islands earlier and that China was a late comer to the island building scene. Scale and speed has nothing to do with it, a claim is a claim regardless and an island built is built. Given enough time and resources, Vietnam and Philippines will eventually cover as much as China. "military equipment", "unlike the other claimants"." _ Taiwan occupies Itu Aba Island, on which it has constructed dozens of buildings for military use, protected by hundreds of troops and twenty coastal guns. Vietnam occupies twenty-one islands on which it has built runways, piers, barracks, storage tanks, and gun emplacements. Malaysia and the Philippines, as stated, have five and nine sites respectively, occupied by naval detachments. ... (Source: Business Insider: The South China Sea will be the battleground of the future) " Vietnam received "little international criticism and even support was because of the slower speed...."" Like I said above, speed has nothing to do with it. I mean, could you tell me what's the "acceptable speed" of island construction then? "You wanted a UN "thing", there you go "United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)"." UNCLOS is a set of rules, it depends on who's doing the arbitration. And the PCA is NOT an official UN agency. In fact, your source deliberately left out its name, calling it "an arbitration tribunal" and "The tribunal" because they didn't want audiences to know it was the PCA, not the ICJ that did the ruling. ""Taiwan stated that they did not recognize the tribunal and insisted that the matter should be resolved through bilateral negotiations with other claimants." See this, BILATERAL NEGOTIATIONS, NOT using force like CCP." Why'd you deliberately omitted China from the sentence? The whole sentence is "Both the People's Republic of China and Taiwan stated that they did not recognize the tribunal and insisted that the matter should be resolved through bilateral negotiations with other claimants."
    1
  18367.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "If Indo does that and it's wrong, CCP doing it makes it right? Besides CCP is doing it on a worst scale." Since when is CPC exploding boats like Indonesia is doing? And on a worst scale too? "ONCE AGAIN, how many times did Indo did what you've said and how many times CCP had done it." A total of 488 ships have been blown up by Indonesia. More than half the boats — 276 — are from Vietnam, followed by vessels from the Philippines (90), Thailand (50), and Malaysia (41). How many times China has exploded boats? Answer: Zero. Yet you're saying China is doing it on a worst scale? "the TW-PH ship accident have nothing more to talk about." The Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident shows that Taiwan has been sending ships to ram others. "Go read "Hainan Island incident", fighter jets are way more maneuverable than that signals intelligence aircraft." Why on are US intelligence aircraft flying over the Chinese territory of Hainan Island in the first place? Theses are specifically "reconnaissance planes" sent to spy on other country's territory, yet instead of making noise over it you are degrading the People's Liberation Army Air Force's successful repelling of these foreign aircraft? "Plainly FASLE. Go google it" I did. NBC, BBC, and Al Jazeera reported that Vietnamese vessels ram China ships 1400 times. "If you don't have another other case than "Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident" which happened in 2013, more than 10 years now." The fact that the incident occurred shows that Taiwan vessels had tried to ram other ships, so all your claims about them not doing is plainly FASLE.
    1
  18368.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "ONCE AGAIN, how many times did Indo did what you've said and how many times CCP had done it." A total of 488 ships have been blown up by Indonesia. More than half the boats — 276 — are from Vietnam, followed by vessels from the Philippines (90), Thailand (50), and Malaysia (41). How many times China has exploded boats? Answer: Zero. Yet you're saying China is doing it on a worst scale? "the TW-PH ship accident have nothing more to talk about." The Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident shows that Taiwan has been sending ships to ram others. "Go read "Hainan Island incident", fighter jets are way more maneuverable than that signals intelligence aircraft." Why on are US intelligence aircraft flying over the Chinese territory of Hainan Island in the first place? Theses are specifically "reconnaissance planes" sent to spy on other country's territory, yet instead of making noise over it you are degrading the People's Liberation Army Air Force's successful repelling of these foreign aircraft? "Plainly FASLE. Go google it" BBC, NBC, Al Jazeera have reported it too. "If you don't have another other case than "Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident" which happened in 2013, more than 10 years now." The fact that the incident occurred shows that Taiwan vessels had tried to ram other ships, so all your claims about them not doing is plainly FASLE.
    1
  18369.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "ONCE AGAIN, how many times did Indo did what you've said and how many times CCP had done it." A total of 488 ships have been blown up by Indonesia. More than half the boats — 276 — are from Vietnam, followed by vessels from the Philippines (90), Thailand (50), and Malaysia (41). How many times China has exploded boats? Answer: Zero. Yet you're saying China is doing it on a worst scale? "the TW-PH ship accident have nothing more to talk about." The Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident shows that Taiwan has been sending ships to ram others. "Go read "Hainan Island incident", fighter jets are way more maneuverable than that signals intelligence aircraft." Why on are intelligence aircraft flying over the Chinese territory of Hainan Island in the first place? "Plainly FASLE. Go google it" BBC, NBC, Al Jazeera have reported it too. "If you don't have another other case than "Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident" which happened in 2013, more than 10 years now." The fact that the incident occurred shows that Taiwan vessels had tried to ram other ships, so all your claims about them not doing is plainly FASLE.
    1
  18370.  @Dragon-g9k7v  A total of 488 ships have been blown up by Indonesia. More than half the boats — 276 — are from Vietnam, followed by vessels from the Philippines (90), Thailand (50), and Malaysia (41). China has exploded zero boats, yet you're saying China is doing it on a worst scale? "the TW-PH ship accident have nothing more to talk about." The Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident shows that Taiwan has been sending ships to ram others. "Go read "Hainan Island incident", fighter jets are way more maneuverable than that signals intelligence aircraft." Why on are intelligence aircraft flying over the Chinese territory of Hainan Island in the first place? "Plainly FASLE. Go google it" BBC, NBC, Al Jazeera have reported it too. "If you don't have another other case than "Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident" which happened in 2013, more than 10 years now." The fact that the incident occurred shows that Taiwan vessels had tried to ram other ships, so all your claims about them not doing is plainly FASLE.
    1
  18371.  @Dragon-g9k7v  A total of 488 ships have been blown up by Indonesia. More than half the boats — 276 — are from Vietnam, followed by vessels from the Philippines (90), Thailand (50), and Malaysia (41). China has exploded zero boats, yet you're saying China is doing it on a worst scale? "the TW-PH ship accident have nothing more to talk about." The Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident shows that Taiwan has been sending ships to ram others. "Go read "Hainan Island incident", fighter jets are way more maneuverable than that signals intelligence aircraft." Why on are intelligence aircraft flying over the Chinese territory of Hainan Island in the first place? "Plainly FASLE. Go google it" BBC, NBC, Al Jazeera have reported it too.
    1
  18372.  @Dragon-g9k7v  A total of 488 ships have been blown up by Indonesia. More than half the boats — 276 — are from Vietnam, followed by vessels from the Philippines (90), Thailand (50), and Malaysia (41). China has exploded zero boats, yet you're saying China is doing it on a worst scale? "the TW-PH ship accident have nothing more to talk about." The Guang Da Xing No. 28 incident shows that Taiwan has been sending ships to ram others. "Go read "Hainan Island incident", fighter jets are way more maneuverable than that signals intelligence aircraft." Why on are intelligence aircraft flying over the Chinese territory of Hainan Island in the first place?
    1
  18373.  @Dragon-g9k7v  "If Indo does that and it's wrong, CCP doing it makes it right? Besides CCP is doing it on a worst scale." Since when is CPC exploding boats like Indonesia is doing? And on a worst scale too? "ONCE AGAIN, how many times did Indo did what you've said and how many times CCP had done it." A total of 488 ships have been blown up by Indonesia. China has exploded 0 boats. Yet you're saying China is doing it on a worst scale? "Go read "Hainan Island incident", fighter jets are way more maneuverable than that signals intelligence aircraft." Why on are intelligence aircraft flying over the Chinese territory of Hainan Island in the first place? Hainan Island is recognized as part of China, yet you're saying that signal-intelligence aircraft are flying over Hainan Island?
    1
  18374.  @Dragon-g9k7v  I did some research into your earlier claim that "Will not be militarized, "someone" said,". It seems like you're implying that Xi pledged not to militarize the South China Sea and then broke it. But it turns out that according to Stapleton Roy, former US ambassador to China, Xi offered to Obama around 2014 to demilitarize the South China Sea, yet Obama rejected it. Instead, Obama stepped up naval patrols. China responded by proceeding with militarization. "Roy, who was in the meeting, explained to Mahbubani that in fact pretty much the exact opposite happened. When Obama raised the issue of the South China Sea, Xi proposed as a solution that they both agree to demilitarize the South China Sea, where neither China nor the U.S. would have military facilities in the area. Obama's response? They rebuffed China's offer and stepped up U.S. military patrols in the area." In short, Xi did not renege on a promise. His offer was effectively spurned by the U.S. Navy. Hope this helps clears up any miscommunication on pledges of non-militarization.
    1
  18375.  @wom_Bat  So if the Russian Olympic Committee is considered part of Russia, then that means Chinese Taipei is part of China then?
    1
  18376. Also, why isn't America spraying disinfectants along the streets? I've seen videos of less developed nations spraying disinfectants in public areas, but USA doesn't seem to be doing this, despite being the epicentre.
    1
  18377.  Patrick Kok  Studies have shown that Chinese (and also) other Asian people like Japanese and Koreans) are perhaps among the world's most intelligent and diligent peoples with rich histories and diverse cultures. But why Asians seem to continue worshipping the West and be under the misconception that we are somehow weaker? Source: Countries by IQ - Average IQ by Country 2020 worldpopulationreview.com/countries/average-iq-by-country/ We need to shrug off this misconception imposed on us and start seeing ourselves as equals instead.
    1
  18378. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18379.  @tyreemoss8990  What makes you think China has serious human rights violations? Chinese people free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your lands and spending coin on your economies. Your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your countries. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 China now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what human rights violations are you talking about? Chinese people can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  18380.  @tyreemoss8990  Eyewitness present in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: The Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We’re ‘Remembering’ are British Lies globalresearch.ca/tiananmen-square-massacre-is-a-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies
    1
  18381.  @tyreemoss8990  China is home to world's largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world-class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Some passengers even experimented by balancing small objects like coin, pen, mobile phones, on their edges, on a train traveling at 350 kph, and the balanced objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for a long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE Before the advent of high-speed rail, during Spring Festival, many people in China would return our home province to celebrate Chinese New Year with family, and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to High-Speed Rail, the commuting time has been reduced from days to mere hours.
    1
  18382.  @tyreemoss8990  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Chinese taikonaut (astronaut) Yang Liwei became the firsst person sent into space by Chinese space program onboard Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtube.com/watch?v=tIviKg4Mduw This makes China the world's 3rd country to achieve independent human spaceflight, after USA and USSR. China is also the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted manned space missions of their own. China is helping making Asians proud by showing that Asians are just as capable of achieving equally impressive feats as Westerners in space.
    1
  18383.  @MarkYeung1  In Russia, a poll by Levada Center found that 83% of Russians approve of Putin's actions as President of the Russian Federation. As for China, a Harvard University and Ash Center survey found that 80-90% of Chinese surveyed support the Communist Party of China.
    1
  18384.  @MarkYeung1  According to a survey, around 83% of Russians support Putin's actions as the President of the Russian Federation. Also, a Harvard University study has found that around 80-90% of Chinese support the Communist Party of China.
    1
  18385.  Meng WAZOO CRIMINAL  Why don't you use a picture of the two Michaels (which you claim Canadians remember) as your profile pic? Have you forgotten what they looked like?
    1
  18386.  @mq4365  Can you praise Putin without being labelled as a Putin puppet in the West?
    1
  18387. Why don't America acknowledge that it is actually an oligarchy instead of democracy, and that the top 1% of Americans control the rest?
    1
  18388. I'm pretty sure as well that the US was behind the former Pakistan President Imran Khan's removal from power.
    1
  18389. Like Daniel Dumbrill said: "They can keep throwing stories at us faster that can be debunked, that's not the hard thing to do, it's to just come up with a random story." It takes more effort to debunk such anti-China stories, then it is to come up with a random anti-China story.
    1
  18390. Prior to 1962 conflict, Chinese premier Zhou Enlai visited New Delhi to negotiate our border dispute and proposed the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence 和平共处五项原则 to help define China-India relations. But PM Nehru refused to sit down to negotiations, and even pursued an aggressive "Forward" policy of building military bases at our disputed border, with some bases even extending beyond the international line into actual Chinese territory.
    1
  18391.  @MarkYeung1  "Shenzhou. This is why Australians have such a negative impression of the Chinese government." For what? The fact that China is Australia's biggest trading partner? Why the Australians have a negative impression of their biggest customer?
    1
  18392.  @keemstarkreamstar7069  I use India as example, because China and India are world's 2 most populous countries with over 1 billion people. So how can you logical compare with European countries and expect China or India to be like that?
    1
  18393.  @harlequin2614  I am quoting examples to support my arguments, so what's your problem? You always welcome to attempt to refute my points if you want.
    1
  18394.  @keemstarkreamstar7069  EU is suffering Brexit and the USA is suffering Trump. And historically, Taiwan wasn't a democracy, it was ruled by authoritarian single-party Kuomintang for more than half its life! The KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist, and Jiang Jieshi jailed and executed his political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as "White Terror" 白色恐怖 and he impose martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: White Terror (Taiwan) wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Terror_(Taiwan) But under authoritarian KMT rule, Taiwan rapidly modernized, resulting in "Taiwan Miracle" 台灣奇蹟. Between 1952 and 1982, Taiwan economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 and 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 and 1986 and the percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 and 1986. All achieved under KMT leadership. So isn't Taiwan's authoritarian rule under KMT clearly similar to the mainland's great economic progress under China? What has democracy got to do with it? Taiwan actually became worse after democracy was forced on them by US (USA threatened to restrict arms sales to Taiwan, if it did not introduce democracy)
    1
  18395.  @iloveporkandchicken4718  Source: Indonesia's Mass Rape Victims Are Waiting for Justice That May Never Come vice.com/en_nz/article/vv5jab/hundreds-of-women-were-raped-during-the-may-98-riots-will-they-ever-see-justice
    1
  18396.  @iloveporkandchicken4718  You are Chinese in Indonesian and you can speak Bahasa Indonesia, because Indonesian government banned Chinese language and culture and force you to learn Bahasa Indonesia. So why can't Chinese government teach Mandarin to Uighurs in Xinjiang then?
    1
  18397. If you flip a coin, and Zeihan says the result is heads, you can bet your life savings it's tails. Just continue betting on the opposite of what Zeihan says, and you'll be a millionaire in no time.
    1
  18398. That's a lot of ships... But still not enough for China.
    1
  18399. Did buy your Huawei phone before the U.S ban took effect?
    1
  18400. You said Taiwan is independent then where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed the declaration and when was it signed?
    1
  18401. Taiwan's economy isn't doing well. Taiwan used to be one of Four Asian Tigers but since democracy was introduced to Taiwan, it's economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving for jobs in the mainland or Singapore Video: How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents | Insight | CNA Insider youtu.be/P3BCnPb8qHY?t=110 "From the '90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreements on policy matters. This produced less effective policy making. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be more conservative in Taiwan, so they do not enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou, Research Fellow, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica
    1
  18402.  @lincolnwikipedia4218  If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of all the territory that Taiwan claims (Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg )
    1
  18403.  @kushio214  Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  18404.  @kushio214  Besides smartphones, Chinese companies also dominate the civilian drone industry. Chinese company DJI is the world's largest civilian drone-maker according to the following source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 top10drone.com/top-drone-companies/ But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  18405.  @kushio214  About mainland China's GDP per capita being lower than Taiwan, that's because mainland China has to host the world's largest population. So if you divide our GDP by our enormous population, then of course you arrive at a lower GDP per capita for the mainland than it is for Taiwan. Take India (world's largest democracy) for example and their GDP per capita is even lower than China's, despite being a Western brand of democracy. As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  18406.  @kushio214  So comparing GDP per capita is fair, (because you can divide our GDP by our enormous population) but when I use China's population to our advantage, that's somehow unfair? You can bring up Japan and South Korea, then why can't I bring up India and USA? About technology in China, China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Taiwan's hi-speed railway and Japan's Shinkansen in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours.
    1
  18407.  @kushio214  So you can compare GDP per capita (by dividing our GDP by our enormous population) then can't I use China's population to our advantage? Chinese universities produce the most STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) out of any other country in the world. Countries With The Most STEM Graduates 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/02/02/the-countries-with-the-most-stem-graduates-infographic/ This implies that China is going to play a much larger role in the STEM fields, given the sheer number of graduates produced in these fields. In the grand scheme of things, China is only going to get better and better over the years. The HDI also compares two countries with the same level of GDP per capita that can end up with different human development outcomes, so isn't it linked to population size as well? Lastly, if you think that Japan or Taiwan could have built even longer train lines if they were the size of mainland China, then it's possible that their GDP per capita and HDI won't be as high as they are today, because of the sheer size of China's landmass. In 2003, China had 0km of high speed rail track, but today, China has more than double the track length of the rest of the world! Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    1
  18408.  @kushio214  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  18409.  @kushio214  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    1
  18410. China is at war with poverty. The United States is at war with poor people themselves.
    1
  18411. Elenskyy sounds like a girl's name. Elenskyy wears high heels. Elenskyy just can't get enough of NATO's big guns.
    1
  18412. Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    1
  18413. Despite China's impressive military arsenal, China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. The USA is bombing those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off those Middle Eastern countries 'heads' (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now it appears that Assad of Syria and Maduro of Venezuela are at risk of US regime change agenda.
    1
  18414.  @frogarcia354  China today is currently at peace, which country is China currently at war with? Our weapons are meant to defend our country in case we are ever attacked by foreign invaders. Besides, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc in African countries. China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, as compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  18415. Chinese call ourselves the Descendants of Dragons 龙的传人 because China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today (like a long serpentine dragon) whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome, and Egypt have long since faded to history.
    1
  18416. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms and would probably have done a 5th, yet Chinese President Xi Jinping is only entering his 3rd term.
    1
  18417. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms whereas Chinese President Xi Jinping is only entering his 3rd term.
    1
  18418. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China..
    1
  18419. ​ @AdamSahr-cj4kf  Nationalities can change. A person may choose to give up his or her citizenship (i.e Malaysian, Singaporean), but their ethnicity will always remain the same (i.e Chinese), regardless of nationality. For example, Albert Einstein gave up his Germany citizenship to become an American citizen.
    1
  18420.  @AdamSahr-cj4kf  I think both nationality and ethnicity are important. If I have to pick one however, I think nationality defines a person since it's linked to the land where he or she is born (or choose to migrate to) while ethnicity is something people have no choice over, they are born with that ethnicity. Still, people shouldn't hate the colour of the skin they were born with, it's part of our ancestry after all.
    1
  18421. About China, Japan, USA and Vietnam, in the end the Japanese surrendered to China in 1945, so who whooped who? And Vietnam is communist country today so isn't Vietcong the victor of that war?
    1
  18422. +rajesh yadav About Indians being "happier" compared to China, India ranks a low 122 among world’s happiest countries. Nations such as China (79), Pakistan (80), Nepal (99), Bangladesh (110), Iraq (117) and Sri Lanka (120) fared better than India on the following ranking in 2017. India ranks a low 122 among world’s happiest countries indianexpress (dot) com/article/india/india-ranks-a-low-122-among-worlds-happiest-countries-pakistan-nepal-fare-better-4578297/ Also, its a myth that Chinese Kung Fu is developed by India not China. Chinese martial arts have existed since the Warring States (and probably even earlier) and developed from a need for self-defense, hunting techniques and military training in ancient China. Hand-to-hand combat and weapons practice were important in training ancient Chinese soldiers. Chinese historical records, like Spring and Autumn Annals of Wu and Yue, the Bibliographies in the Book of the Han Dynasty, the Records of the Grand Historian, and other sources document the existence of martial arts in China for thousands of years. For example, the Chinese martial art of wrestling, Shuai Jiao predates the establishment of Shaolin Kungfu by several centuries. So why do you claim Indian buddhist monk developed Kungfu and India gave Buddhism to China? Chinese martial arts were developed even earlier than Buddhism. Also, as far as I know, Gautama Buddha was born in what constitutes modern day Nepal, not India. China film industry is the world's largest film market, that even Hollywood wants a slice of the pie. Look at many recent China and Hollywood movie collaborations like The Great Wall, Pacific Rim: Uprising and other such movies. Chinese film stars like Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Michelle Yeoh, Jet Li, etc are world famous, and there aren't as many Bollywood stars in Hollywood as compared to Chinese film stars in my opinion.
    1
  18423.  @hamiorg  Hey, you specifically asked for Chinese villains, and when I point numerous examples, you start accusing me of being victimised? As Chinese myself, I personally found many Hollywood movies to be severely lacking in Asian actors. Asian actors (Chinese,Japanese, Koreans) are simply underrepresented in Hollywood, often casted into cliche roles like martial artist, triad thug, nerdy but social inept guy, hacker, etc. Asian actresses often get roles as damsel in distress (to be saved by Caucasian male lead) or prostitutes, dragon ladies, massage parlor workers, other sexualized roles etc. Hopefully, China's influence on Hollywood can grant more prominent roles to Asian actors/actresses.
    1
  18424.  @hamiorg  And I already answered your question that the era is during the "Yellow Peril" when China (also Japan) was considered evil. The term was first coined by Kaiser Wilhelm ll of Germany in 1895, but it has been used to describe the racial threat posed to the West by the rising powers of the Far East, specifically China and Japan. Here's a seminar about the Yellow Peril. Video: The Yellow Peril: Images of Asians in American Film and Visual Culture youtu.be/AmME59hB-CE Just because you never heard of it, doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. Asian actor under representations is especially acute given that only 3 Asian Actors have ever won an Oscar. Ever. Video: Only 3 Asian Actors Have Won an Oscar...Ever youtu.be/0YZV8J_0nCw And why are you bring up Native Americans, Middle Easterners and others, when the topic is specifically about Chinese? Yet you are accusing me of being victimised when the topic is about Chinese villains?
    1
  18425.  @hamiorg  You just asked for the era only and I have given it as "Yellow Peril." Earlier you said that "It implies Hollywood has had an era of specifically targeting Chinese people by portraying them as villains when that doesn't seem to be true" and I have already answered by quoting the "Yellow Peril" so what more do you want? -The Cheat (1915) actor Sessue Hayakawa as "Burmese" ivory merchant -Charlie Chan at the Opera (1936) actor Warner Oland as Charlie China -The Mask of Fu Manchu (1932) actor Boris Karloff as Fu Manchu Then there's Zhang Ziyi as a villain in Rush Hour 2, there's Jet Li as a villain in Lethal Weapon 4, Donnie Yen as villain in Shanghai Knights, there's Jet Li again as villain in The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor, Chow Yun Fatt in Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End. And since this whole thread is about Chinese villains, why are you bringing up Mexicans, Native Americans, etc? Yet you're accusing me of being victimised?
    1
  18426.  @hamiorg  What do I care what you wrote to the OP? You weren't talking to me when you're talking to OP, the only part where you started talking to me was when you said that "It implies Hollywood has had an era of specifically targeting Chinese people by portraying them as villains when that doesn't seem to be true" and I already named it as the 'Yellow Peril' so why are you purposely ignoring what I wrote? How many times have I mentioned 'Yellow Peril' yet you still ask about the era? Since when did I ever named a couple of movies from the Stone Age (before 8700 BC)? You can't refute my points after I named several movies featuring Chinese villains, so you just ignore what I wrote? Yes, some of the Rush Hour hero's were Chinese, but you specifically asked for Chinese villains (which I have shown) so what's your point? And Chow Yun Fatt's character is still a villain in Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End even if not the main villain, so what's your point then? You can't refute my points so you start claiming that I am victimised? I have provided answers your questions but it's you who refuse to acknowledge anything that I wrote. Why resort to calling me the victim when you're the one who refuse to acknowledge my answers?
    1
  18427.  @hamiorg  How exactly have I lost the argument, you self-proclaimed victor? You asked for an era and I clearly named the 'Yellow Peril' yet you still denying what I answered. And since I quoted movies from decades ago, then why did you claimed that I claimed it from the Stone Age then? Yes, I said the term was first coined by Kaiser Wilhelm ll of Germany in 1895, but I never said that it only applied to 1895 isn't it? Just because a term is coined long ago doesn't mean that the term isn't used today. Rush Hour and Shanghai Knights are American action comedy films and yes while there were Chinese characters as heroes, you specifically asked for Chinese villains and I clearly gave the Chinese villains, so what's your point then? You asked for Chinese villains right? I never said anything about the first Rush Hour movie, so why are you bringing it up? Just like why you brought up Native Americans, Mexicans, etc, when the point is about Chinese? Why are you bringing up topics that aren't relevant to the main point? Chow Yun Fatt's character is a villain, how do you prove that he was an anti-hero?
    1
  18428.  @hamiorg  I have never said Hollywood has repeatedly victimised Asians, so why are you imposing your own preconceptions about me? I never said that Hollywood has repeatedly victimised Asians, you're the one asking for Chinese villains and I am providing you with answers. Yet you still mock my answers and started hurling personal insults against me for my views? I mean, did I ever said that Hollywood has repeatedly victimised Asians and made us villains? Can you quote me my exact words? Because I clearly never said Hollywood has repeatedly victimised Asians and made us villains so where did this idea come from inside your head?
    1
  18429.  @hamiorg  You're just a self-proclaimed victor, mindlessly claiming that I lost the argument and constantly denying the existence of the Yellow Peril. And I cited several movies featuring Chinese villains (you asked for it!) but you ignore my examples and constantly try to distract me by proclaiming that there are Chinese heroes. Yes there are Chinese heroes, but you asked me for Chinese villains isn't it? And you claimed that I am playing the victim? I never said that Hollywood has repeatedly victimised Asians and made Chinese the villains, you're the one asking me for Chinese villains here. And you resorted to hurling personal insults against me, such as dumbass, twit, dips**t, brainwashed, idiot and all manner of insulting terms.
    1
  18430.  @hamiorg  So what's your definition of an era? 10 years? 20 years? 50 years? Some people believe that "Yellow Peril" never ended and is in effect today, so what's your definition of an era then? And how do you define villain? If in a movie a group of Chinese gangsters accost the protagonist, does that make them the villains? I have answered all your questions to the best of my abilities but if you just going to ignore my evidence, and self-declare yourself the victor.
    1
  18431.  @hamiorg  And you're the one who said that I am playing the victim, but did I ever said that Hollywood has repeatedly victimised Asians and made us the villains? I clearly never said that, it's all inside your mind's view of me. You don't even know me yet your claiming that I am playing the victim here? My first point on this thread was about white-washing that's all. I personally want to see more Asian actors take up roles in Hollywood films that's all. Is Chinese playing a villain a role? Yes it is, and one of my favourite Chinese villain portrayal was Jet Li in Lethal Weapon 4. Video: Lethal Weapon 4 Jet Li fight scene youtu.be/eJeTSle5cN8 I love Jet Li's performance in that video as a villain, he literally made the protagonists afraid of him (which is what a villain should be) What I want to see is more Asian actor representation in Hollywood films that's all.
    1
  18432.  @hamiorg  Why can't I continue talking? And while other people in this thread talk about Chinese villains, that's not what I was talking about, I was talking about the lack of Asian representation in Hollywood films. For example, according to the following video: Only 5% of characters in 2017's top 10p - grossing films were of Asian descent, with just 4 of the movies featuring an Asian lead character. And 37 of those top 100 movies had no Asian actors at all. Video: Hollywood's Asian Problem youtu.be/0L6IRJExiG0 And in my opinion, playing Chinese villain is still an opportunity for Asian actors to shine.
    1
  18433.  @hamiorg  Perhaps it's because of "white-washing" where Caucasian characters are casted to play characters of Asian descent (e.g. Scarlet Johanson as protagonist in Ghost in the Shell or Tilda Swinton as The Ancient One in Doctor Strange) These acts are possibly depriving Asian actors the opportunity to play Asian characters. To gain acting experience and recognition for their efforts.
    1
  18434.  @hamiorg  Yes, especially those people who ask for an era, but cover their ears upon hearing answers like the Yellow Peril. Or those who asked for Chinese villains, and after I gave several examples, they start saying that there were Chinese heroes as well in those films. Then why ask for Chinese villains then?
    1
  18435.  @hamiorg  What makes you think the Yellow Peril had nothing to do with Hollywood? You never answered my question on how long you define an era, whether its 10 years, 20 years, or 50 years or whatever. Some people even believe that the Yellow Peril is ongoing till today so what makes you think it has nothing to do with Hollywood? And you said "Name the movies in succession, damn name 5 in a row at least" and you never specified that the movies had to be from Hollywood. And why did you suddenly bring up the Chinese as heroes when what you're asking for is Chinese villains? You accused me of "playing the victim" that Hollywood has repeatedly victimised Asians and made us into the villains, but did I ever said anything about being victims of Hollywood? Why don't you answer my questions first if you want me to answer yours? I clearly said answres some of your questions and I stated that Asian underrepresention in Hollywood is my own opinion that's all.
    1
  18436.  @hamiorg  Yellow Peril may have origins in ancient Greece, but the fact that it survives till today shows that it spans over thousands of years till today. Even Wikipedia has an entry on Yellow Peril and its relation to cinema. In the 1930s, Hollywood offered two contradictory images of Asian men: (i) The malevolent master-criminal, Dr. Fu Manchu; and (ii) The benevolent master-detective, Charlie Chan.[93] As a Yellow Peril villain, Fu Manchu is "Rohmer's concoction of cunning Asian villainy [that] connects with the irrational fears of proliferation and incursion: Racist myths often carried by the water imagery of flood, deluge, the tidal waves of immigrants, rivers of blood."[94] In 1936, when the Nazis banned his novels in Germany, because they believed him Jewish, Sax Rohmer denied being racist and published a letter declaring himself "a good Irishman", wherein he was disingenuous about the why of the Nazi book-ban, because "my stories are not inimical to Nazi ideals." Source: Cinema of the Yellow Peril wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_Peril#Cinema_of_the_Yellow_Peril The Mask of Fu Manchu (1932) reflects the white man's sexual-anxiety as the basis of Yellow Peril fear; thus Fu Manchu (Boris Karloff) urges his Asian army to "Kill the white man and take his women!" Incest, between father and daughter, is a recurrent theme in the narrative of The Mask of Fu Manchu, especially the ambiguous nature of the relationship between Fu Manchu and his daughter, Fah Lo See (Myrna Loy), an example of the unnatural sexuality of the yellow race. Emperor Ming the Merciless, nemesis of Flash Gordon, was another iteration of the Fu Manchu trope. Peter Feng calls him a "futuristic Yellow Peril", quoting a reviewer who referred to Ming as a "slanty eyed, shiny domed, pointy nailed, arching eyebrowed, exotically dressed Oriental". Likewise, Buck Rogers fought against the Mongol Reds (aka the Hans), who had conquered the U.S. in the 25th century. So its clear that Yellow Peril influenced Hollywood, yet you're constantly denying everything I said and even resorted to hurling personal insults against me (like dumbass, twit, dip**t, brainwashed, idiot) for my views? You asked for Chinese villains and I already mentioned numerous examples, yet you're bringing up Chinese heroes for what, when you yourself asked for Chinese villains? And did I ever said anything about Hollywood repeatedly victimising Asians and making us the villains? You haven't answered all my questions yet you still demand that I answer your question?
    1
  18437.  @hamiorg  You merely refused to acknowledge the Yellow Peril that's all, despite all the times I kept on posting it again and again.
    1
  18438. China doesn't want to be number one, like USA, It is a taxing, tiring and thankless position to be in.
    1
  18439.  @eod995  Does showcasing mainland military drills automatically make me a bot? The People's Liberation Army has tanks, missiles, helicopters, drones, artillery and so on, isn't a it much more impressive than this military display by Taiwan?
    1
  18440.  @dicksonw113  If you have weapons but don't test them out in drills, then how else would you know if they work? Check out this awesome 2018 mainland military drill. Video: Chinese Big Military Exercise 2018 (Missile Launch) youtu.be/ht3jNf66nbo The People's Liberation Army has tanks, missiles, helicopters, drones, radars, artillery, howitzers, multi-launch rocket systems, fighter jets, strategic bombers, warships, ICBMs, and so on. Our soldiers even train at night and conduct live fire exercises in complete darkness.
    1
  18441.  @bebisibeb  You mean every single video regarding the Taiwan/mainland issue? What's wrong with me commenting on these videos?
    1
  18442.  _Hellnaw_  "神州 Shenzhou How much did the ccp pay you everytime you use YouTube?" None, What makes you think I'm being paid by CCP to use YouTube?
    1
  18443.  _Hellnaw_  Who said YouTube is banned in China? Nobody will come arrest you for logging on to YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested for doing so?
    1
  18444.  @sac22833  So YouTube is merely blocked in China that's all, not banned isn't it? I mean, there are so many foreign companies that come to China and set up shop here, and many of them require access to Western websites like Facebook, YouTube, Google, Twitter, etc to operate, so the government issue VPN license to these companies. The polls were conducted by US think tank, Pew Research Centre and found that Americans have ranked Taiwan as their lowest concern on a list of eight issues to do with China. Source: Americans say Taiwan is the least of their worries about China scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2161734/americans-say-taiwan-least-their-worries-about-china
    1
  18445.  @sac22833  What has Taiwan even got to offer the USA? Look, back in 2014, Russia had that military intervention in Crimea and annexed it from Ukraine and all Washington did was impose sanctions on Moscow that's all. No US-Russia War. So would the Americans want to go to war with mainland China over Taiwan? The polls have shown that only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan. Do you have any more modern polls over Taiwan then? Since you keep on dismissing my poll? Who said that Chinese users are prevented from using YouTube? People in China can always access Western websites like Facebook, YouTube, Google, Twitter, etc using VPN, the same as foreign companies, so what makes you think Chinese people are prevented from accessing these websites? "The govt. can kick people out of the country, or imprison anyone on a whim" Don't other governments have the same power to deport foreigners out of their country too? USA also deported Chinese people from their country and look at Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou (who's also Huawei CEO's daughter) whose been arrested by Canada (on the USA's behest) for so long? USA has no evidence against Meng, yet Canada just detain her in order to strike an economic blow against our country.
    1
  18446.  @sac22833  "神州 Shenzhou The US didn't intervene in Crimea because it wasn't their interest in doing so." Then what's Taiwan even got to offer the USA, you tell me? You still haven't answered my question, you just keep saying polls results change, without offering another US poll on Taiwan. China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  18447.  @sac22833  "Now about Meng Wanzhou, the justice department have ton and tons of documents regarding her involvement of breaking the US sanctions on Iran." Where's this so-called tons and tons of documents regarding her involvement of breaking the US sanctions on Iran. Meng Wanzhou was arrested in December 2018 (2 years ago) yet even in 2020, her case still haven't been settled and USA presented zero evidence of her breach of US sanctions on Iran. It's obvious that USA has no evidence and is trying to buy time to manufacture evidence against Meng Wanzhou in order to strike an economic blow against China's economy through Huawei. You said: "Counter example of China, they arrested three Canadians, without a charge, without a court date, and without bail. If Meng had to choose between spending prison in China or Canada, she would definitely choose Canada. I think if you had to choose, you'd choose the Canadian prison over Chinese prison as well." Which 3 Canadians are you talking about? China has arrested some Canadians on charges of espionage, so why are you claiming that there was no charges? And what makes you claim that Meng Wanzhou would choose Canadian prison over Chinese prison? Meng Wanzhou is a VIP in China and would get much better treatment in China’s prison over the Canadian prison, so what's your basis for your claim?
    1
  18448.  @sac22833  "Now about the VPN, if China didn't want Chinese to use Facebook, Google, or Facebook they wouldn't block it." You said "Facebook" twice. And you said that if China didn't want Chinese to use those websites, they wouldn't block it, then pray tell, what would China do, you tell me? I mean, if China don't want Chinese to use those websites, they would block it, right? What's your logic? And besides, China have our own Chinese social media like Weibo, Baidu, Youku, etc, so is there really a need for Western websites like FaceBook, YouTube, Google, Twitter in China?
    1
  18449.  @sac22833  "神州 Shenzhou do you not read carefully? The US will intervene if they feel that China is a threat to them if they invade Taiwan" That's why I keep on asking you: "What's Taiwan even got to offer the USA, you tell me?" This is the third time I am asking you and you repeatedly failed to answer this question of mine. I cited polls showing that only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan, but you keep on dismissing it and you have given nothing to support your argument that's all. Most countries recognise Taiwan as part of China, even US President Trump has agreed to honor the One China policy after receiving phonecall from President Xi Jinping. Source: Trump Tells Xi Jinping U.S. Will Honor ‘One China’ Policy nytimes.com/2017/02/09/world/asia/donald-trump-china-xi-jinping-letter.html Since USA consider Taiwan part of China, then if Taiwan declares independence, it will be treated as an internal rebellion (or the continuation of the Chinese Civil War) and not an invasion of another country. Because Taiwan is part of China after all. And it takes 2 years for Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou to be extradited? I thought you said earlier that the justice department have ton and tons of documents regarding her involvement of breaking the US sanctions on Iran, so why is it taking 2 years? Why hasn't USA revealed the so-called documents pertaining to Meng's involvement in US sanctions? Is it because USA has no evidence and needs to buy time to manufacture evidence against Meng? To strike an economic blow to Huawei and China's economy? And what's the names of the arrested 3 Canadians which had no charge, no trial and no lawyers? You can't even name me the arrested Canadians so that I can read up on their cases, all you do is make accusations against China that you can't support. "Look what happened when some people show videos about what's really happening in Wuhan. They disappeared." Which person showing videos about Wuhan has disappeared, you tell me?
    1
  18450.  @sac22833  Why don't you answer my question of "What has Taiwan even got to offer the USA?" you tell me? I've been asking you this question for some time now, but you refuse to explain why, and even after I cited polls that indicate only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan, you just dismissed it without offering a counter poll of your own. Chen Qiushi has been suspected of contracting COVID-19 and has been quarantined because of it. He hasn't disappeared, so why are you claiming that he disappeared when he's merely being quarantined? Source: Citizen journalist covering coronavirus forcibly quarantined by government in Wuhan, say friends edition.cnn.com/asia/live-news/coronavirus-outbreak-02-08-20-intl-hnk/h_7db7078e5b48df6fe066f47a9b8182d8 I mean, if he keeps going to the front lines of the outbreak, then he's almost certainly bound to contract the coronavirus and quarantined. That does not mean that he's disappeared, so what's your problem then?
    1
  18451.  @sac22833  The Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor have been charged with spying in China, so how exactly are they arrested without charge like you said earlier? They have charged and the charge is espionage. Source: China charges Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor with spying scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3010517/china-charges-canadians-michael-kovrig-and-michael-spavor Former diplomat Michael Kovrig was charged with gathering state secrets, while businessman Michael Spavor was charged with stealing and providing secrets for overseas forces, foreign ministry spokesman Lu Kang told a press conference. Who's the third Canadian? You said that there were 3 Canadians arrested, so who's the third Canadian?
    1
  18452.  @sac22833  So, you've just shown that Chinese people can indeed, (contrary to popular belief) criticise the government, so what's your point then? Why do you foreigners claim that Chinese people can't criticise the government when you've just shown that Chinese people can indeed criticise the government?
    1
  18453.  @sac22833  Granted, the Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, Europe, USA and India. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  18454.  @sac22833  According to your source, the third Canadian, Sarah McIver is being held in China for working illegally, so why did you claim that those 3 Canadians were arrested, without a charge? You have already proven your own statement to be wrong, since the 3 Canadians are charged with 2 on espionage and 1 on working illegally. Your source even says that Ms. McIver’s detention does not appear to be further retaliation for Ms. Meng’s arrest, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said, so why are you continually associating their arrests with Huawei CFO, Meng Wanzhou? Hey, I thought you said that the justice department have ton and tons of documents regarding her involvement of breaking the US sanctions on Iran, yet why hasn't USA gotten the trial over with? Meng was arrested in December 2018 and its already 2020 and her case is still not over? And let me tell you that Meng is CFO (an important position in Huawei) so what's the point of being confined in her home supposed to mean? You presented zero evidence of her breach of US sanctions on Iran, and her detention is being done to strike an economic blow to Huawei and China's economy. Who cares about whether the conditions they are in? Meng is an important figure of Huawei and has much to offer to China, but what have those Canadians got to offer to Canada?
    1
  18455.  @sac22833  You've just shown that Chinese people can indeed, criticise the government, so what's your point then? And what about my question "What has Taiwan even got to offer the USA?" I've been repeatedly asking this question, because Taiwan doesn't seem to offer much interest to USA, in order to justify USA going to war with mainland China over Taiwan. Polls also indicated that only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan, as I cited earlier, but all you done is dismiss this poll, without offering a counter poll of your own. And the USA only allowed China into the World Trade Organisation, and they weren't out to help China. WTO was founded in 1995 and back then, China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate our country as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because the United States, European countries, and Japan requested that China first reform various tariff policies, including tariff reductions, open markets and industrial policies. That's why China had a late entry into WTO in 2001. So if not for USA and its allies, China would have been a founding member of WTO in 1995, instead of having a late entry in 2001. It's USA that was hindering China's success by blocking our entry into WTO first.
    1
  18456.  @sac22833  "Many countries also had economic miracles i.e Japan, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong. So don't say that the CCP did everything by itself, if you think so, then I suggest you take an economics class." Hong Kong and Taiwan aren't countries themselves, they're both considered part of China under the One Country, Two Systems policy and the One China policy respectively. And Hong Kong's economic miracle occurred in 19th century under the authoritarian rule of colonial Britain, in which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony from 1841-1997. Yet Hong Kong actually flourished under authoritarian British colonial rule for 150 years, transforming into a prosperous port city as a British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's handover back to mainland China in 1997, did the people of Hong Kong finally able to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy? When they had none before? For 150 years as British colony?
    1
  18457.  @sac22833  About Taiwan Economic Miracle, Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the Kuomintang ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: White Terror (Taiwan) wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Terror_(Taiwan) But under single-party KMT leadership, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, resulting in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986 and the percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And it was all achieved under single-party KMT rule. Source: Taiwan Miracle wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_Miracle Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced to Taiwan (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan if KMT did not introduce political reforms) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since Taiwan prospered under single-party KMT rule, then is there a need to adopt democracy then?
    1
  18458.  @sac22833  South Korea had that South Korean dictator, Park Chung hee (朴正熙). While seeking to bring South Korea into the developed world, Park began a series of economic policies that brought rapid economic growth and industrialization to the nation that eventually became known as the Miracle on the Han River. When Park came to power in 1961, South Korea's per capita income was only US$72.00 (poorer than even some sub-Saharan African countries) and North Korea was the greater economic and military power on the Korean peninsula. One of Park's main goals was to end the poverty of South Korea, and lift the country up from being a Third World economy to a First World economy via etatist methods and Park is credited with playing a pivotal role in the development of South Korea's tiger economy by shifting its focus to export-oriented industrialisation. South Korea became one of the fastest growing nations during the 60s and 70s as a result. However, Park became increasingly authoritarian later in his reign. In 1972, Park declared martial law and amended the constitution into a highly authoritarian document called the Yushin Constitution, effectively abolishing the former constitution and granting him power. During this time, political opposition and dissent was constantly repressed and Park had complete control of the media and military. You can read more about Park Chung hee, the South Korean dictator who lifted South Korea out of poverty, in the following source. Source: Park Chung hee wikipedia.org/wiki/Park_Chung-hee The point is, South Korea's economic miracle occurred under authoritarian rule of Park Chung hee, so is there really a need to adopt democracy then?
    1
  18459.  @sac22833  Singapore's economic miracle occurred under authoritarian rule and Singapore has been ruled by single-party PAP rule for its entire life as a nation. For over 50 years, the People's Action Party ruled Singapore with an iron fist and Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore’s founder) was a benevolent dictator who tolerated no dissent to his rule and either jailed or exiled his dissidents and political rivals. Many early Singapore dissidents have been exiled from Singapore, and his political rivals have been jailed to keep them from running in elections, since they have criminal records. But under authoritarian single-party PAP rule, Singapore flourished from a once sleepy fishing village nation, into a world-class country today and able to compete with many of her neighbouring South East Asian countries. All achieved under PAP leadership. Lastly, Japan's economic miracle occurred much earlier than the others. Japan's industrialisation occurred under the Meiji Restoration under the imperial rule of Emperor Meiji (in which the period was named after) and Japan was still under authoritarian imperial rule of emperors, right up to WWII. The Meiji Restoration discarded old Japanese traditions and the samurai class (which were seen as unnecessary and a burden on Japan's resources) were abolished and many remaining samurai rebelled and fought against an increasingly modernised Japanese army armed with firearms. You might have seen the movie The Last Samurai starring Tom Cruise, and that movie was set during the wake of the Meiji Restoration.
    1
  18460.  @sac22833  Go and read the Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China under the One China policy, so even Taiwan considers itself part of China. There have been no formal declaration of independence by Taiwan, no signed document whatsoever, so under Taiwan's laws, they are still part of China then. And Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore, Korea, and Japan all had their economic miracles under authoritarian rule, like I've elaborates in my mini economics class. South Korea flourished under the authoritarian rule of South Korean dictator, Park Chung hee, leading to the Miracle on the Han River, the Taiwan Miracle occurred under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Singapore has always been under authoritarian single-party PAP rule for over 50 years, Hong Kong flourished under authoritarian British colonial rule for 150 years, and Japan first industrialised during the Meiji Restoration under Japanese Emperor Meiji. That's why Imperial Japan was more technologically advanced than China, with fighter planes, tanks, warships, battleships and aircraft carriers during WWII. Since Japan had already industrialised without democracy before WWII, then democracy hardly played any role in Japan's success. I mean, I have given you a mini economics class in those countries/states economic miracles under authoritarian rule, so how exactly does democracy even contribute to their economic miracle? You can't even refute my economics class here, yet you still insist that democracy helped when there is no evidence of it? Why don't you elaborate how exactly does democracy play a role? Give a economic class of your own?
    1
  18461.  @sac22833  You can't refute my economic lessons on Japan, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong, so you change the topic to the COVID-19? Look at Japan and South Korea having ample time to prepare for the arrive of COVID-19 (already more than one month already) yet South Korea and Japan did not prepare for the coronavirus at all? Until now South Korea is declaring red alert? They had months to prepare, yet they did nothing about it, until the cases started appearing. Because they are democracy isn't it? Look at the Diamond Princess cruise ship in Japan and they quarantined the cruise ship, but that's all, and the Japanese government do nothing to prepare for their eventual disembarkation. Then what's the point in alerting these countries when they don't take it seriously then? China had far less time to prepare than Japan and Korea, yet China managed to seal off most of the cases in Hubei, despite China being a far bigger country (in terms of population) than Japan or South Korea.
    1
  18462.  @sac22833  I'm still waiting for you to answer my repeated question of "What's Taiwan even got to offer the USA?" and for your poll to prove my poll wrong, that only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan. Look at China and we have since transformed from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the PLA, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, it's manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ("Made in Taiwan" used to be commonplace, but now it's been largely replaced by "Made in China) Taiwan has repeatedly failed to deliver on it's promise to retake the mainland and it relies in US weapons imports. Worst of all, Taiwan today has hardly any global presence, it's merely a chesspiece on the chessboard between world powers.
    1
  18463.  @sac22833  So once again, why don't you explain "What has Taiwan even got to offer the USA?" Let me rephrase it to "What's US interest in Taiwan, you tell me?" You can't even answer the root of the question, I cited polls showing that only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan, but you just dismiss it without offering a counter poll of your own. What has Taiwan even got to offer the USA you tell me?
    1
  18464.  @sac22833  China has produced so many successful businesses like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, and so on. If you look at smartphones for example, Chinese smartphone companies dominate the 2019 Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands according to the following source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are all the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How is Taiwan even going to compete with the sheer economic power of mainland China?
    1
  18465.  @rodrigom.salamanesjr.976  Why not attempt to refute my points instead of mocking me for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    1
  18466.  @rodrigom.salamanesjr.976  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  18467.  @PlayGame-ub2gk  Murdered millions? Then why is China currently the world's most populous country? Statistically speaking, China the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  18468.  @PlayGame-ub2gk  Look at prosperous Shenzhen in the mainland, just across from Hong Kong and Shenzhen’s economic growth surpassed Hong Kong's in 2017. Source: Shenzhen surpasses US$338 billion GDP mark in 2017, beats Hong Kong and Singapore’s growth scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2128310/shenzhen-88-cent-hi-tech-growth-roll-hit-y2tr-2017 Shenzhen is roughly the same economic size as Singapore and Hong Kong, but recorded nominal output of 2.2 trillion yuan (US$338 billion) in 2017 thanks to its booming hi-tech sector. Over 40% of the output came from “innovative” businesses such as internet, biotech and telecom. And that's despite Shenzhen being under communist party rule, while Hong Kong is suffering under its own democratic government.
    1
  18469.  @PlayGame-ub2gk  Surveys have shown that only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan. Source: Polls show only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/2156237/what-would-us-do-if-beijing-decided-take-taiwan-force
    1
  18470.  @PlayGame-ub2gk  So why did Canada arrest Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou, even though Meng did not break any Canadian laws while in Canada? Why did they started it? Meng was arrested in 2018 and its already 2020 and her trial still hasn't concluded?
    1
  18471.  @PlayGame-ub2gk  What's that even got to do with the this video about Taiwan? Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. All verified eyewitness accounts say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We\'re \'Remembering\' are British Lies ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053
    1
  18472.  @PlayGame-ub2gk  What has Tiananmen Square even got to do with this video about Taiwan? According to Jay Matthews, reporter for The Washington Post, as far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 and all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. Source: The Myth of Tiananmen archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php
    1
  18473.  @PlayGame-ub2gk  I did, but it's a cartoon animation that's all. Whereas I cited reports by journalists, showing that Nothing Happened in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 and all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. And what has Tiananmen Square even got to do with this video about Taiwan?
    1
  18474.  @PlayGame-ub2gk  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  18475.  @PlayGame-ub2gk  Why are you so obsessed with Tiananmen Square, in this video about Taiwan? Even Wikileaks has confirmed that there was No Bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989. Source: Wikileaks: no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square, cables claim telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8555142/Wikileaks-no-bloodshed-inside-Tiananmen-Square-cables-claim.html
    1
  18476.  @PlayGame-ub2gk  About the infamous "Tankman" video, here's what my first Tiananmen Square Massacre myth Source (by Gregory Clark) has to say: As for Tankman, we now know from the cameraman himself that his widely-publicised photo was taken from his hotel window the day AFTER the riots, and the tanks were going away from, not into, the Square. And what has Tiananmen Square even got to do with this video about Taiwan?
    1
  18477.  @PlayGame-ub2gk  I asked you the question: "What has Tiananmen Square even got to do with this video about Taiwan" and your response is to throw my question back at me? Is it because you can't refute my points so you start bringing up Tiananmen Square even after I cited several articles showing that it was a myth?
    1
  18478.  @PlayGame-ub2gk  Wikileaks recently released secret cables from the U.S. embassy in Beijing that show that U.S. diplomats knew there was no massacre of protesters in Tiananmen Square in 1989. A Chilean diplomat who was present in the square described the situation to his U.S. counterpart, stating that the Chinese soldiers were armed with only truncheons and wooden clubs. He said there was no mass firing into crowds of demonstrators at the Monument to the People’s Heroes. The leaders of the demonstration, including Liu Xiaobo, told the students to leave Tiananmen Square. Once an agreement was reached, they left through the southeast corner, according to the diplomat. This contradicts the reports of many so-called “journalists” who covered the incident. “There was no massacre on Tiananmen Square,” said James Miles, a BBC correspondent on the scene at the time. “Protesters who were still in the square when the army reached it were allowed to leave after negotiations with martial law troops.” Source: Wikileaks: No massacre in Tiananmen Square liberationnews.org/wikileaks-no-massacre-in-html/
    1
  18479.  @PlayGame-ub2gk  "神州 Shenzhou let me guess was it your CCP that created the myth" No, read my sources. Read the one from Jay Matthews and he says: Student leader Wu’er Kaixi said he had seen 200 students cut down by gunfire, but it was later proven that he left the square several hours before the events he described allegedly occurred. (So he left the Square several hours earlier, how could he have witnessed the gunning down of students in the Square?) CBS correspondent Richard Roth’s story of being arrested and removed from the scene refers to “powerful bursts of automatic weapons, raging gunfire for a minute and a half that lasts as long as a nightmare.” Black and Munro quote a Chinese eyewitness who says the gunfire was from army commandos shooting out the student loudspeakers at the top of the monument. (So Chinese commandos were shooting at the loudspeakers, not at the student protesters) A BBC reporter watching from a high floor of the Beijing Hotel said he saw soldiers shooting at students at the monument in the center of the square. But as the many journalists who tried to watch the action from that relatively safe vantage point can attest, the middle of the square is not visible from the hotel. (So how could he witness soldiers shooting at students when it simply wasn't visible from his vantage point?)
    1
  18480.  @PlayGame-ub2gk  A Chilean diplomat (Carlos Gallo) who was present in the square described the situation to his U.S. counterpart, stating that the Chinese soldiers were armed with only truncheons and wooden clubs. He said there was no mass firing into crowds of demonstrators at the Monument to the People’s Heroes. This was taken from Wikileaks by Chilean diplomat, how is it being brainwashed by CPC? Source: wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/89BEIJING18828_a.html
    1
  18481.  @BlvlWmpower  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  18482.  @clintongarma7855  How is China a threat to Western democracy? China is not interested in exporting our political system, unlike the Soviet Union with communism (or the USA with democracy). President Xi Jinping has publicly stated we will not export our political system. Source: President Xi says China will not export its political system reuters.com/article/us-china-parties-idUSKBN1DV4UM “We will not import other countries’ models, and will not export the China model,” Xi said. “We will provide more opportunities for the world through our development,” he said.
    1
  18483.  @clintongarma7855  Occupying territories? Why don't you you tell all the non-Native Americans, Canadians and Australians to get out of America and Australia and leave those lands to Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals? About Religion in China, China has nearly 200 million religious believers and more than 380,000 clerical personnel. The major religions practiced in China are Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism, and Protestantism, said the white paper, titled “China’s Policies and Practices on Protecting Freedom of Religious Belief.” Source: (nation.com.pk/03-Apr-2018/china-has-over-20-million-muslims-35-000-mosques ) China has over 20 million Muslims, and more than 57,000 clerical personnel. There are around 222,000 Buddhist clerical personnel and over 40,000 Taoist clerical personnel. Catholicism and Protestantism have 6 million and 38 million followers in China, respectively, with 8,000 and 57,000 clerical personnel. There are approximately 5,500 religious groups in China, including seven national organizations which are Buddhist Association of China, Chinese Taoist Association, China Islamic Association, Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association, Bishops’ Conference of Catholic Church in China, National Committee of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement of the Protestant Churches in China, and China Christian Council. At present, there are about 144,000 places of worship registered for religious activities in China, among which are 33,500 Buddhist temples (including 28,000 Han Buddhist temples, 3,800 Tibetan Buddhist lamaseries, and 1,700 Theravada Buddhist temples), 9,000 Taoist temples, 35,000 Islamic mosques, 6,000 Catholic churches and places of assembly spread across 98 dioceses, and 60,000 Protestant churches and places of assembly. …… And experts have debunked the notion of Covid-19 being a bioweapon. Source: No, the Coronavirus Is Not a Bioweapon from China nationalinterest.org/blog/coronavirus/no-coronavirus-not-bioweapon-china-145112
    1
  18484.  @clintongarma7855  According to reports, the number of Christians in China is growing so steadily that it by 2030 it could have more churchgoers than America. Source: China on course to become 'world's most Christian nation' within 15 years telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/10776023/China-on-course-to-become-worlds-most-Christian-nation-within-15-years.html
    1
  18485.  @clintongarma7855  "神州 Shenzhou you are wrong and you are a liar, all you saying is a lie there's no religious freedom in china." I already gave you statistics for religion in China. China has nearly 200 million religious believers and more than 380,000 clerical personnel. The major religions practiced in China are Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism, and Protestantism, said the white paper, titled “China’s Policies and Practices on Protecting Freedom of Religious Belief.” Source: China has over 20 million Muslims, 35,000 mosques nation.com.pk/03-Apr-2018/china-has-over-20-million-muslims-35-000-mosques China has over 20 million Muslims, more than 57,000 clerical personnel. There are around 222,000 Buddhist clerical personnel and over 40,000 Taoist clerical personnel. Catholicism and Protestantism have 6 million and 38 million followers in China, respectively, with 8,000 and 57,000 clerical personnel. There are approximately 5,500 religious groups in China, including seven national organizations which are Buddhist Association of China, Chinese Taoist Association, China Islamic Association, Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association, Bishops’ Conference of Catholic Church in China, National Committee of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement of the Protestant Churches in China, and China Christian Council. At present, there are about 144,000 places of worship registered for religious activities in China, among which are 33,500 Buddhist temples (including 28,000 Han Buddhist temples, 3,800 Tibetan Buddhist lamaseries, and 1,700 Theravada Buddhist temples), 9,000 Taoist temples, 35,000 Islamic mosques, 6,000 Catholic churches and places of assembly spread across 98 dioceses, and 60,000 Protestant churches and places of assembly. Yet you're accusing me of being a liar?
    1
  18486.  @clintongarma7855  "神州 Shenzhou the numbers of christians in china are growing?! According to who!?!" I already gave you the source, yet you accused me of being liar? Do you know which country produces the most Bibles? Answer: China. China continues to be the largest producer of Bibles in the world, thanks to the Amity Printing Company in Nanjing. Source: China is world’s largest producer of Bibles worldwatchmonitor.org/coe/china-is-worlds-largest-producer-of-bibles/ Twelve million copies came off Amity’s presses in 2015, the majority for export. The company stated in a press release that it has the capacity to print 20 million Bibles each year. Its Bibles are exported to more than 70 countries and printed in 90 languages. A report in 2013 said that 4 million copies were sold in China, but questioned whether this kept up with demand. According to Pew Research, there are at least 68 million Christians in China.
    1
  18487.  @andrew_Gaming  Is there something wrong with me using a VPN?
    1
  18488. 俄乌之战，目前听到最简单、最精辟之语: 美国点火💣 俄罗斯开火💥 乌克兰着火🔥 印度观火🌋 中国大陆降火❤‍🔥 台湾玩火♨️ The Ukraine war: American litted the fire Russia started the fire Ukraine caught fire India looking at the fire Mainland China putting down the fire Taiwan is playing with fire
    1
  18489.  @markgreen8045  "神州 Shenzhou okay, so you admit the CPC is warmongering." Did I ever said that? Could you please quote me my words saying that? I'm asking you in which of Cyrus videos did he ever been a warmonger, but you're unable to cite any examples. Cyrus videos consistently portray his peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" and if you're claiming that he's spreading the CPC's message, isn't this a positive message for the world? The alternative message of promoting war is unthinkable, it would be a disaster for the whole world, if a hot war breaks out between US and China.
    1
  18490.  @markgreen8045  How am I behaving like a spoilt child? Let's look at what you said earlier. Quoting your own words, you said: "Cyrus the virus is CPC tool. You are brainwashed." "神州 Shenzhou Message of Peace? You haven't seen his past videos. "Cyrus the Virus" is a CPC tool. He repeats everything the CPC tells him to say. He has sold his soul to the CPC and hates the US. THe CPC is marching the Chinese people into war. This poor pathetic Youtuber is helping the CPC with all their lies. Don't reply to me with anymore stupid comments." Clearly, your words are full of hatred and insults against Cyrus, such comparing him to a virus (a rather childish insult). I've been asking you for evidence of Cyrus being a warmonger, when his videos promote the consistent message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls". And if you claim Cyrus is repeating the message that the CPC tells him to say, then isn't his message a positive one for the world? Because the alternative message (that of promoting war) is not what the world needs at all.
    1
  18491.  @markgreen8045  I would feel better if you could explain your reasoning how you think Cyrus is a warmonger, when his videos have been consistent with his peaceful message. And you're the one resorting to personal insults against me (i.e comparing me to a spoilt child and my comments as stupid) just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    1
  18492.  @markgreen8045  Earlier you made those accusations that were full of hatred and resentment towards Cyrus, calling him a "virus" and a CPC tool, a poor pathetic Youtuber who sold his soul to the CPC and hates the US, then what is the source of all this anger towards him? Obviously, you had a negative impression of Cyrus, which I assume stems frome Western MSM like BBC and New York Times sometimes feature expats like Cyrus and portray them as so-called CPC shills, but where's the evidence for this? I watched Cyrus' previous videos and his message has always been one of peace, of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" yet you accuse him of being a warmonger, so I'm willing to hear you out on why you think that what. But thus far, you've been tight-lipped and simply refuse to explain why you think he's a warmonger. Instead, you seem to compare me to a spoilt child and presume that I'm full of hate.
    1
  18493.  @LULU-zi1ih  Taiwan economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are unable to find jobs so many of them find employment in the mainland instead
    1
  18494.  Adam Roper  Civilised? Here's a video of Taiwan parliament fight where government members threw water bombs (they actually prepared those?) and even furniture at each other. Video: Massive fight breaks out in Taiwanese parliament youtu.be/kXmPDLRt6hA In comparison, here's Communist Party of China meeting in the mainland. Full video: Opening session of 19th CPC National Congress youtu.be/X3pc3SqK5jI Which is more civilised?
    1
  18495.  @Jeremyho439  人矿 rén kuàng simply means "human mine," and it first appeared in 1984 in People's Daily 《人民日报》 to refer to people as a form of resource to develop the country.
    1
  18496.  @Anonymous------  You said: "Most of the things made in China have nothing to do with USA and can't be found in USA." iPhone is Made in China, and it's most certainly found in the United States.
    1
  18497.  @michaelmoore1637  The U.S economy is based on printing U.S dollars (backed by nothing) whereas China's and Russia's economies are at least backed by commodities (Made-in-China goods, Russian oil, gas, wheat)
    1
  18498.  @jane29jeng  The French eat snails and horsemeat, British eat rabbit stew, people in Australia eat kangaroo meat so who are you to dictate other people's culinary preferences? And the coronavirus Wuhan virology lab conspiracy has been debunked by experts too. Source: The Wuhan Virus Is Not a Lab-Made Bioweapon foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/29/coronavirus-china-lab-mortality-virology-wuhan-virus-not-bioweapon/
    1
  18499. 台湾是中国不可分割的一部分- 中华人民共和国驻日本大使馆 有关台湾的全部事实和法律证明，台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分。 中国人民在捍卫国家主权和领土完整的正义斗争中形成的“一个中国”原则，具有不可动摇的事实和法理基础，为国际社会普遍接受。 台湾自古属于中国。
    1
  18500. 台湾是中国不可分割的一部分。有关台湾的全部事实和法律证明，台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分。 中国人民在捍卫国家主权和领土完整的正义斗争中形成的“一个中国”原则，具有不可动摇的事实和法理基础，为国际社会普遍接受。 台湾自古属于中国。
    1
  18501. 有关台湾的全部事实和法律证明，台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分。 中国人民在捍卫国家主权和领土完整的正义斗争中形成的“一个中国”原则，具有不可动摇的事实和法理基础，为国际社会普遍接受。 台湾自古属于中国。
    1
  18502. 有关台湾的全部事实和法律证明，台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分。
    1
  18503. 中国人民在捍卫国家主权和领土完整的正义斗争中形成的“一个中国”原则，具有不可动摇的事实和法理基础，为国际社会普遍接受。 台湾自古属于中国。
    1
  18504.  @lorellaldos5263  China is investing in producing domestic lithography machines. Shanghai Micro Electronics Equipment (SMEE) Group has already developed a 28nm-capable lithography machine. All that's needed is time.
    1
  18505. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18506.  @user-dp5cn1ou7t  You said: "There is a much older Western saying with the same meaning," Much older? The earliest allusion to the Chinese idiom 良药苦口 comes from the Warring States Period (475 – 221 BC) by Chinese philosopher Han Fei (韩非). This was centuries before Jesus Christ himself was born. Also, what Western saying? Everybody knows that Jesus Christ himself was born in the Middle East and that's where Christianity originated from. You said: "The Chinese fail to understand how truly ancient the West actually is." More likely it's the reverse, as you've just demonstrated when you claim there's a much older Western saying, without looking up when the Chinese idiom. If anything, the Chinese fail to understand the depths of Western hubris in claiming a religion that originated in the Middle East as "Western."
    1
  18507.  @AsianJayWalker  Today China is a country of homeowners with more than 90% of households owning homes (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes, higher than many developed nations (Huang et al., 2020).
    1
  18508. Lt. Pyukumuku Do you even know what constitutes International Waters? According to the following map, the South China Sea is NOT considered International waters; it's Light Blue on the map instead of Dark Blue. Wikipedia: International waters wikipedia.org/wiki/International_waters
    1
  18509. +Lt. Pyukumuku If you don't want Wikipedia then also here is a map of the Global High Seas and the South China Seas are clearly not part of the High Seas. Global High Seas Source: mpatlas.org/media/filer_public/16/93/169310c1-6292-414a-a053-19f7db73a7e6/globaleezs_logo.jpg
    1
  18510. +Lt. Pyukumuku Since you claim that it is "International Waters" then Philippines also has no right to claim that territory isn't it? Since you claim that it is international Waters. Also, Vietnam is building islands in South China Sea as well, then why doesn't USA complain about Vietnam's island-building activities? Vietnam builds islands in South China Sea Source: businessinsider.com/vietnam-building-islands-in-south-china-sea-2016-5/?r=US&IR=T
    1
  18511. Western propaganda is very pernicious, they can spin a few small incidents into a massive web of lies about draconian measures in Shanghai and feed it to their audiences. And many in their audiences (but not all) just gobble up those lies.
    1
  18512. +Peter Byrne Likewise, where is Matas and Kilgour 'extensive' research to exaggerate China's organ transplant figure from 10,000 to 100,000? Where does China get all the organ doctors to support nearly as many organ transplants as the rest of the world put together? My source makes use of international experts, including Dr. Campbell Fraser, a scholar from your Australia's Griffith University who was also present at the Geneva conference, "I would like to clearly state that China does not use organs from Falun Gong practitioners, I'm absolutely convinced of that. The people running those campaigns are activists who have got a political view in contrary to what China is all about. Such a claim is just nonsense, they think that it will be difficult to prove that it does not happen, but I've been to China and I know this is totally untrue," Fraser said. Here is another article, in which organ experts Jose Ramon Nunez Pena, medical officer of the World Health Organization, and Michael Millis, vice-chairman for global surgery and director at the University of Chicago's School of Medicine Transplant Center, dismissed the allegations of organ harvesting rumors. Pena, a transplant surgeon who has visited China often, said the claimed number (100,000) is equal to the transplant activity of the entire world and is practically impossible. Source:Organ harvesting rumors slammed chinadaily.com.cn/china/2016-08/19/content_26531057.htm
    1
  18513.  Akimbo Soulassassin  The eagle 🦅 can't even defeat the bear during the Cold War, yet it wants to take on the dragon🐉?
    1
  18514. America sells nuclear subs to Australia and thinks France will thank them for it.
    1
  18515. Even the United States has acknowledged that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18516. In the past when the mainland was poor, the people of Hong Kong tend to be arrogant towards mainland Chinese. They look down on you if you speak Mandarin to them. But now, the people in mainland are richer, and the standard of life has improved greatly, whereas HK economy is slowing, so HK people grudgingly treat mainland Chinese better this time.
    1
  18517. 漢子 说的好，佩服你和我一样，能说两种语言， 能理解两个世界不同的看法。
    1
  18518. Westerners made use of Chinese inventions like paper, compass and especially gunpowder, in order to colonize other countries and become powerful. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners using our technology?
    1
  18519. +Montaque Zen 没有罗马水泥有什么了不起呢？古代中国人没有水泥，但还能创造长城，用糯米饭就行了。
    1
  18520. Montaque Zen 你干嘛骂我粗话？现在罗马帝国已经分裂了，但中国还在对吗？中华上下五千年历史，所以为啥我们不能用现代的水泥呢？
    1
  18521.  @rajdipsaha  "What's the origin of Covid-19" Nobody yet knows for sure, but there's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  18522.  @knowpex  "tell me any humanitarian act of China towards India or rest of the world." Source: Chinese biz major Fosun donates masks to India to fight Covid-19 economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/chinese-biz-major-fosun-donates-masks-to-india-to-fight-covid-19/articleshow/74683674.cms Source: Chinese billionaire Jack Ma says he will donate 1,000,000 face masks and 500,000 coronavirus testing kits to the US cnn.com/2020/03/14/tech/jack-ma-face-masks-us-donation/index.html Source: Chinese billionaire Jack Ma donates 1,000,000 masks to coronavirus-hit Japan straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/chinese-billionaire-jack-ma-donates-1-million-masks-to-coronavirus-hit-japan Source: China donates 1.1 million masks to South Korea newspm.com/2020/03/22/china-donates-1-1-million-masks-to-south-korea/ Source: China sends medical supplies, experts to help Italy battle coronavirus uk.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-italy-respirators/china-sends-medical-supplies-experts-to-help-italy-battle-coronavirus-idUKKBN2101IM
    1
  18523.  @SWUnreal  "yes because when countries want to ban flights to and from China the ccp cried racism" Because some of those foreign countries banned Chinese from entering other countries, but they didn't ban their own citizens from returning. No quarantine for their own overseas returning citizens too. Whereas China quarantine foreigners entering China as well as our own returning overseas Chinese.
    1
  18524.  @knowpex  "If calling Covid-19 as Wuhan or Chinese virus is racial comment...Spanish Flu, Ebola, German measles.." It's the WHO itself that advises against the naming of diseases after a region or specific race, and since Covid-19 is the proper term, then why do people still call it by it's improper name? Look at the numerous racially-motivated attacks against Asian Americans (or Asian Canadians, Asian Australians, Asian Europeans, etc) because American politicians like Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo choose to call it "Chinese virus" instead of its proper name. Video: Asian Americans face discrimination in the wake of the coronavirus youtu.be/t_IyTxRNUYk
    1
  18525.  @knowpex  China is not ungrateful for receiving Indian medical supplies, and we are helping pay it forward by sending medical supplies to other countries that have been affected by the coronavirus. Video: India pledges to send medical supplies to China against the epidemic youtu.be/4awJxfMQG7Q You merely asked what humanitarian act of China towards India or the rest of the world and I answered accordingly.
    1
  18526.  @knowpex  I too, am against racist attacks. There was this Indian woman (Meera Solanka) who help protected her Chinese friend (Mandy Huang) from a racist attack on UK. Source: Indian-origin woman in UK beaten for trying to save Chinese from racist attack over coronavirus timesofindia.com/nri/other-news/indian-origin-woman-in-uk-beaten-for-trying-to-save-chinese-from-racist-attack-over-coronavirus/articleshow/74288736.cms
    1
  18527.  @knowpex  China had offered Spain a list of approved Chinese suppliers to buy from, but Spain choose to buy from unapproved company, Bioeasy, which is not on the list of approved vendors. So why blame China when Spain choose to buy from unapproved company not on the list? Even your source says so.
    1
  18528.  @knowpex  You mock Chinese faulty products, then look at how Indian makes masks. Video: Making masks | India | Coronavirus youtu.be/KFziEl_GW18 Video: Face mask manufacturing in India? youtu.be/--pwI4E9tsk
    1
  18529.  @knowpex  Here's a look inside Chinese BYD mask factory. Video: China: Factory produces 5 million masks a day in bid to supply shortfall youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw?t=17
    1
  18530. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18531. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18532. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18533.  @EvilDrDude  About Kuwait, not even the Americans cared about it initially, until testimony emerged from a little girl (Nayirah) claiming that Iraqi soldiers were taking babies out of incubators. But it turns out it was fake and merely an excuse for the U.S to justify their rationale to support Kuwait in the Gulf War. And the second time, President Bush had accused Iraq of harboring Weapons of Mass Destruction, but after the Iraq War, no WMDs were ever found in Iraq.
    1
  18534.  @EvilDrDude  U.S President Bush also accused Iraq of harbouring WMDs, but after invading Iraq, no WMDs were ever found in Iraq. According to Iraq Body Count, an estimated 200,000 Iraqi civilians have been killed as a result of the Iraq War.
    1
  18535. Russia and China don't want to rule the world, but it is USA that insist on maintaining global hegemony.
    1
  18536.  @AndTecks  Look at the surge in Omicron cases in USA, their healthcare system getting swamped, people choosing not to wear masks in public and while attending schools, and China is actually doing everything to contain the Covid-19 situation, unlike the U.S government.
    1
  18537. Military sense? It would mean World War 3 if NATO missiles strike inside Russia's border!
    1
  18538. Military sense? It could potentially trigger WW3 if US missiles strike across the Russian border.
    1
  18539. Military sense? It could trigger the next world war!
    1
  18540. Military sense? It could result in WW3!
    1
  18541.  @nunurbuisness5578  Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought.
    1
  18542.  @Mikoyuu71  Republic of China published the 11-Dash Line in 1947. Also UNCLOS is not an organization, what are you talking about?
    1
  18543.  @ronwaldoilagan6045  China made a declaration in 2006 in accordance with article 298 of section 3 of part XV of UNCLOS not to accept 3rd party arbitration when it comes to settling territorial disputes. Philippines and China had initially agreed on the South China Sea Code of Conduct to settle disputes bilaterally, but Philippines choose to settle the dispute by 3rd party arbitration in violation of the code.
    1
  18544.  @Mikoyuu71  UNCLOS is a convention that countries sign up to, it's not an international body under the UN. Also, UNCLOS does not deal with matters of territorial disputes or to resolve issues of sovereignty, as that field is governed by rules of customary international law on the acquisition and loss of territory.
    1
  18545.  @ronwaldoilagan6045  "Shenzhou. . Yes, we agree on that point, but the agreement does not include militarising and creating artificial islands." Other countries have been building airbases in the South China Sea long before China arrived at the scene. Vietnam began construction of its airstrip on Spratly Island in 1976, making this the first runway in the Spratly island group. In 1978, the Philippines incorporated Thitu Island after airstrip construction had already begun. In 1983, Malaysia built an airstrip atop Swallow Reef. Taiwan's government finished constructing its airstrip on Itu Aba in 2008. In fact, China is a late-comer to the scene, only building an airstrip on Fiery Cross Reef in late 2014, when other countries have long been militarizing the South China Sea before that. (Source: Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative: Airpower in the South China Sea)
    1
  18546.  @vishnuvijwani  Yes.
    1
  18547.  @vishnuvijwani  Yes, why?
    1
  18548.  @vishnuvijwani  Why the Hong Kong protests last for so long? It's almost as if some foreign anti-China power is secretly sponsoring the Hong Kong protests continuation from behind the scenes. Also, some Hong Kong protestors are waving United States Flag 🇺🇲 and United Kingdom Flag 🇬🇧 so could these be the foreign powers funding the HK protests to drive a wedge between Hong Kong and the mainland?
    1
  18549.  @TheBaconEarBuccaneer  Do you have evidence that the White Shirt Triads were actually paid by the government? They are triads members so why would Hong Kong government work with them? And a number of the Yuen Long gangsters been arrested isn't it? The MTR driver may not know that these triad members are beating up civilians when he opened the MTR doors. I mean, it's possible that the MTR driver could be providing the civilians an escape route by opening the doors, so why do you expect an apology from MTR? What about those rioters who wreck MTR stations? Where's the apology and compensation for MTR? It's those Hong Kong youths are getting carried away here.
    1
  18550.  @TheBaconEarBuccaneer  You don't even know about the truth if Prince Edward MTR arrests. The fact is that a group of men dressed in black clashed with the passengers and then attacked them. Video: Facts tell: Did HK police beat passengers at Prince Edward Station? youtu.be/h426rrJF0OU A video online shows protestors attacking passengers indiscriminately inside the station first. Protestors harassed passengers and sprayed them with fire extinguishers. The protestors assaulted a female commuter who is recording their behaviour, trying to grab the woman's phone and pushed her to platform screen. Hong Kong Police were called to the scene to stop the violence. Some protestors even changed and disguised as normal residents. One of the "residents" even pulled up his mask while being caught on camera.
    1
  18551.  @vishnuvijwani  Why should USA and UK help Hong Kong when Hong Kong is part of China? Its our own internal affairs and Britain has agreed to handover Hong Kong back to mainland China isn't it?
    1
  18552.  @badguy1481  said "The American economy is growing...while China's is going down.." As far as I know, U.S GDP growth is 3.2%, whereas China's GDP growth is 6.4%.
    1
  18553. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18554. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18555. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  18556. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18557. If you read their constitution, it says Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18558. No doubt about it, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  18559. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China if you read their constitution.
    1
  18560.  @michaelkatz275  You said: "The United States owes only 1.095 trillion dollars to China, not 7 trillion." So you agree that the U.S owes a trillion dollars to China then?
    1
  18561.  @MarkYeung1  According to the IMF, China's economy is rebounding and is forecasted to expand by 5.2% this year according to their projections. Even the rating agency Fitch has revised its forecast for China's economic growth in 2023 to 5.0% from 4.1% previously as consumption and broader activity are recovering faster than initially anticipated.
    1
  18562.  @eliotanderson6554  Even if you believe China has Han supremacy and domination, India clearly has Hindu supremacy and dominance.
    1
  18563.  @niyarao2962  The People's Liberation Army is world's largest land army and in tanks China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank has commanded healthy respect from international observers, as its performance parameters are equal to many top Western designs (like the Russian T-90 and the US M1 Abrams), and the Type 99 also packs a few unique tricks of its own. Source: China's Deadly Type 99 Tank vs. Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/chinas-deadly-type-99-tank-vs-russias-t-90-americas-m-1-17836 China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank was even featured in our 70th anniversary National Day parade. Video: China's new generation main battlefield tanks revealed in National Day Parade youtu.be/Ec4Bu2orKTk
    1
  18564. It all started because during 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want what the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and force China to buy opium from them, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to pump the addiction throughout rest of China, and Hong Kong was taken and made into British colony. When Britain renounced ownership over its former colonies, Hong Kong wasn't even fully returned back to China.
    1
  18565.  @tl4172  What nuclear lies? China did indeed sign the No-First-Use policy in 1964, and has since maintained this policy. Whereas the USA has not signed such a treaty and can preemptively launch a nuclear strike at any country with impunity. Source: No first use wikipedia.org/wiki/No_first_use
    1
  18566. During wartime, the PLA Rocket Force won't just launch a single DF-21 "Carrier Killer" missile, they would launch an entire volley of missiles to increase the chances. Maybe even two or three volleys.
    1
  18567. +ivan ivanovitch ivanovsky Firstly, China's DF-21 missiles are launched from the land high above the stratosphere, so which aircraft can intercept the missiles from this altitude? Secondly, the DF-21 is highly maneuverable and capable of avoiding anti-missile defenses made by warships, and it even has terminal guidance, allowing it to make minute adjustments just before impact. China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile Video: youtube /watch?v=p-cEunmqXM8
    1
  18568. Agreed. Had there been a real "massacre" in Bucha, the Russian forces had weeks to "bury all the evidence" instead of just stupidly leaving those bodies strewn about haphazardly all over the place (like how'd that person die right in the middle of the road?) for the Ukrainians to "discover" upon their arrival. But like Brian says, more evidence needs to be uncovered to get to the truth of the matter.
    1
  18569.  @Jordie-c4k  That sounds like what Western journals have been saying about China since 1990. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong. Their predictions about China have been wrong for more than 30 years already.
    1
  18570.  @Jordie-c4k  Look at what Western headlines been saying about China since 1990 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong. Their predictions about China have been wrong for more than 30 years already.
    1
  18571.  @Jordie-c4k  Look at what Western headlines been saying about China since 1990. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  18572.  @Jordie-c4k  Why should President Xi be blamed for scaring off foreign investors? The current geopolitical tensions were caused by the West (namely the US) who are unable to accept the trend that the US is in decline while China is rising, so they are doing everything in their power in order to keep their hegemonic rule over the planet, and this includes slapping tariffs and sending warships to Chinese waters in the South China Sea.
    1
  18573.  @Naikomi95  "yes, I changed my mind after visiting." Which part of our vast country of China did you visit?
    1
  18574.  @Jordie-c4k  You said: "Only political reform can bring better policies for economic growth" Not necessarily true. Take Taiwan for example, they used to be one of the Four Asian Tigers, with a flourishing economy dubbed the Taiwan Miracle. Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7% (1952–1982) and 6.9% (1983–86), and Taiwan's GDP grew by 360% (1965–1986). Yet Taiwan's economic growth occurred under the authoritarian single-party rule of the Kuomintang, who had imposed martial law on Taiwan for 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. It's when political reforms are introduced to Taiwan in the 1990s, did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Today, Taiwan's economy is stagnate. Wages are stagnant. Cost of living is rising, and Taiwan graduates are leaving the island seeking employment opportunities in the mainland or in Singapore. So how exactly does political reform bring better policies for economic growth?
    1
  18575. Video: 'Shanghai' - LAOWA 7.5mm f/2 Aerial Footage on DJI Inspire 2 youtu.be/1cC-j4_NtvE?t=6
    1
  18576.  @bjrnhjortshjandersen1286  Besides dominating hydroelectricity, China also dominates solar power, and the current largest photovoltaic power station in the world is the 850 MW Longyangxia Dam Solar Park in China. The largest floating solar farm in the world is located in Huainan City in Anhui province, Eastern China. Video: World's largest floating solar farm in E China youtu.be/qKpYH5SYUeo
    1
  18577.  NEO GEO  The USA did not wage a hot war with the former Soviet Union, so what makes you think USA will wage a war with China then?
    1
  18578.  @bjrnhjortshjandersen1286  Is there something wrong with me bringing China's positive achievements? China's first 100-Megawatt solar power plant was put into operation in NW China's Gansu Province. The molten-salt solar thermal power plant covers 7.8 square kilometres and has a 260-meter-high heat-absorbing tower. Using 12,000 large-sized reflection mirrors the power plant is capable of generating power all day long. Video: China's first 100MW solar power plant goes into operation youtu.be/Uo8FH9huaP4
    1
  18579.  @bjrnhjortshjandersen1286  About technology in China, China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours.
    1
  18580.  @bjrnhjortshjandersen1286  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  18581.  @bjrnhjortshjandersen1286  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA in all 3 subjects: reading, science and mathematics. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    1
  18582.  @arthurzettel6618  Chinese leadership makes the final decision after several rounds of discussion during the 20th Party Congress and their decisions improve the lives of the people of China. Can you say the same for the West?
    1
  18583. Who said China blamed Africa for the Covid-19?
    1
  18584.  @-AchmadPrayogiRafsanjani  It's not that Muslims can't assimilate, it's just that some Muslims don't want to, because Western governments aren't pressurizing them so they don't change. Some Muslims even go further and build mosques in their host countries (like in Spotsylvania County, Virginia, for example) much to the resentment of locals. Video: Anti-Muslim Americans youtube.com/watch?v=INy4gaUrCL4
    1
  18585.  @-AchmadPrayogiRafsanjani  What's wrong with teaching them communism? Muslims teach the glory of Islam, then why can't China teach our citizens proper Chinese history you tell me? The Uighur children don't even have the basic fundamentals of education, like arithmetic, algebra, Chinese history, science, Chinese characters, so what are you complaining about? And every country teaches their kids to love the country and sing patriotic songs isn't it?
    1
  18586.  @-AchmadPrayogiRafsanjani  The United States is warmonger, having been involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libya War, etc, even in the 21st century. And it does not solve the problem of terrorism, USA is using the opportunity to enact regime change by cutting off those countries "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. The US is bombing those Middle Eastern countries, destroying lives (Iraq Body Count Project reported 200,000 civilian deaths) and property, leaving families broken, homeless, jobless, harboring anger against the Unite States. With nothing more to lose, many of the victims flock to join the terrorist's cause, so the terrorists have no shortage of potential recruits, thanks to the USA bombing the Middle East. That's why when one terrorist cell is destroyed, another seemingly pops up in its place. China's approach to dealing with terrorism is to educate Muslims, remove the extremist thoughts, train them in job skills and cultivate a sense of loyalty to China, so that they won't migrate to Middle East to join the terrorists. The US's approach clearly does not work, so why not try out China's approach instead?
    1
  18587.  @ritikasharma4578  How do you know the true circumstances of their situation? Those Uighurs who traveled abroad may have had terrorist connections with Uighurs living abroad and Chinese government has discovered them and sent them to re-educational schools to reform their thinking. But VICE News just conveniently neglect to mention this, in order to paint China in a negative light.
    1
  18588. @ALex T Those people starved because of Great Chinese Famine, which was caused by bad weather conditions like floods and drought causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvest. Even Mao Zedong can't possibly control the weather now isn't it?
    1
  18589. @ALex T Eyewitnesses at Tiananmen Square in Jun 1989, said nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking those remaining students to leave the Square late that night. Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053
    1
  18590. @ALex T The Falun Gong organ harvesting is a rumor that has long been dispelled by experts. Source: Donor organ rumors refuted in Geneva china.org.cn/china/2018-05/28/content_51526073.htm Taken from above Philip O'Connell, director of the Centre for Transplant and Renal Research at the Westmead Institute for Medial Research in Australia, said "One reason why some people believed them (rumors) in the first place was because of the lack of knowledge". Francis Delmonico, another leading expert who attended the news conference, said he agreed with O'Connell that the rumors have been effectively countered by the transparent and complete data Chinese authorities provided. Jose Ramon Nunez, an adviser at the WHO, said "We have this (figure)－135, 000 organ transplantations performed every year in the world－which is only 10 percent of the real needs". I mean, otherwise why don't world leaders like President Trump raise the issue of organ harvesting with President Xi? Why don't German Chancellor Merkel, British PM May, Canadian PM Trudeu, Indian PM Modi, Japanese PM Abe, or other world leaders every bring up organ harvesting in China?
    1
  18591. @ALex Tsaid "Why does your gov't not allow more than one ideology?" What are you talking about? China is the only country in the world that allows more than one ideology to exist within our borders. The One-Country Two-System policy put forth by China, allows multiple ideologies to exist within our borders simultaneously, and No other country in the world has such a policy. Look at Democratic countries and they won't allow communism to exist within their borders, so aren't your countries the ones that don't allow more than one ideology? Tell me which country in the world has 2 ideologies existing simultaneously within their borders, except for China?
    1
  18592.  @kristiadihartanto2623  said "神州 Shenzhou just stop complaining will you." You people can s**t all over China all day and paint negative picture of China, then why can't I point out some of the positive things that China is doing?
    1
  18593.  @kristiadihartanto2623  They why are you telling me to stop complaining? Those are your exact words isn't it?
    1
  18594.  @kristiadihartanto2623  Modern China was built by the sweat, blood, tears and sacrifice of the Chinese people and our government, to turn China from a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, into an economic juggernaut today, a growing scientific and technological power, the world's factory (Made in China), protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, and China today has strong global presence as well as being influential player of world politics. And it's all been achieved under CCP leadership. Despite what Western anti-Communist media has been denouncing all this while, China has seen great success under CCP, and not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  18595.  @kristiadihartanto2623  According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Wikipedia: Poverty in China
    1
  18596. @ALex T I have shown that China has more than one ideology existing within our borders. Hong Kong was originally part of China before being taken and made into a British colony. Even when Britain renounced ownership over it's former colonies, Hong Kong was not even fully returned to China, when Hong Kong is legally part of China. And which democratic country tolerates more than one ideology existing within its borders you? None! No other country in the world have more than one ideology existing within its borders, except for China, so what's your point about ideology?
    1
  18597. @ALex T I've already talked about how Falun Gong rumor of organ harvesting have been dispelled by various international experts in China. And once again, Mao Zedong did not kill those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine, and it is well-documented. In July 1959, the Yellow River flooded in East China and according to the Disaster Center, the flood directly killed, either through starvation from crop failure or drowning, an estimated 2 million people, while other areas were affected in other ways as well. Source: The Most Deadly 100 Natural Disasters of the 20th Century disastercenter.com/disaster/TOP100K.html In 1960, an estimated 60% of agricultural land in northern China received no rain at all and the Encyclopædia Britannica yearbooks from 1958 to 1962 also reported abnormal weather, followed by droughts and floods based on Chinese government sources. This included 760 millimetres (30 in) of rain in Hong Kong across five days in June 1959, part of a pattern that hit all of Southern China. As a result, year over year grain production dropped in China, which led to the Great Chinese Famine. So why are you calling Mao a "mass murderer" when they starved to death because of famine? Because of Western anti-Communist propaganda?
    1
  18598. @ALex T said "The total number of dead from 1959 to 1961 was between 30 million and 40 million." Where did you get such a exaggerated death toll figure? China's population in 1955 was 598,574,241 and by 1960, it had actually grown to 644,450,173 (having increased by 45,875,932). Source: Population of China 1955 populationpyramid.net/china/1955/ So you're claiming China's population fell by 40 million, yet it actually increased overall by 45 million during that period? Where did you get such bloated death toll figures from? The Western anti-Communist propaganda somehow inflated its death toll figures to portray Mao in a negative light?
    1
  18599.  @kristiadihartanto2623  "神州 Shenzhou yea yea but still i do concern about you." What? I've stopped complaining and start talking about some of China's achievements, yet you are still aren't happy about it?
    1
  18600.  @kristiadihartanto2623  You should come visit China sometime and see how much China has changed. Here's a short 2-min clip of 11 Chinese cities and their beautiful skylines at night. Video: Beautiful Night View of China 2016 youtube.com/watch?v=G7ZRa-w9xyA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  18601. @ALex T Then what makes you think you can believe what Westerners say about China? The Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again, which government body is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, India, Europe and USA. Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China), the world's 3rd largest arms exporter, having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army and funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And its all been achieved under CCP leadership. Despite what the Western anti-Communist propaganda been denouncing all along, China is immensely successful under CCP leadership.
    1
  18602. @ALex T China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Sudan, Chad, Ghana, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, etc. Whereas the United States is a warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, etc, even in the 21st century. The USA is enacting regime change by cutting off those country's "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Assad of Syria and Maduro of Venezuela are next on the US regime change agenda.
    1
  18603. @ALex T China clearly tolerates more than one ideology as I have undoubtedly shown with One-Country, Two-Systems policy. Hong Kong and Macau are part of China, yet they allowed different political systems from mainland China. Whereas which Western democratic country tolerates having another political system within its borders? None! You have literally failed to achieve any ground with this point that you yourself brought up.
    1
  18604.  @ritikasharma4578  It's a holiday today, so why can't I discuss issues online here?
    1
  18605.  @kristiadihartanto2623  According to World Tourism Rankings, China is the world's 4th most visited country after France, Spain, and the United States, seeing some 60.7 million tourists in 2017. Source: World Tourism Rankings wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings China is also the most popular tourist destination in Asia, surpassing even Japan, Korea, India, Thailand, Malaysia.
    1
  18606.  @ritikasharma4578  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, and our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE
    1
  18607.  @holidaytrout5174 What?
    1
  18608.  @dustyeyer3573  Besides dominating hydroelectricity, China also dominates in solar power, and the current largest photovoltaic power station in the world is the 850 MW Longyangxia Dam Solar Park, in Qinghai, China. China is also home to world's largest floating solar farm in Huainan City, Anhui, East China. Video: World's largest floating solar farm in E China youtube.com/watch?v=qKpYH5SYUeo
    1
  18609.  @libra6492  Russia is clearly going through great lengths to avoid civilian casualties, else they would have employed their superior firepower to level Ukrainian cities (much like what USA did during the Iraq War, Afghan War, etc). You said: "Obviously you do not know anything about Putin, Russians and their history. My advise is to do research and you will know." There's video materials available on YT for people who wish to know the history behind the conflict Video: Why is Ukraine the West's Fault? Featuring John Mearsheimer youtu.be/JrMiSQAGOS4 Video: Vladimir Pozner: How the United States Created Vladimir Putin youtu.be/8X7Ng75e5gQ Video: Ukraine on Fire documentary by Oliver Stone youtu.be/pKcmNGvaDUs
    1
  18610.  @Brolaeggerdk  According to the serial number of the Tochka-U in Kramatorsk, it can be traced back to the 19th Missile Brigade of Ukrainian Armed Forces. This is reported on Italian media:youtu.be/sWLl0aGQEPw
    1
  18611. Germany and Russia should call for a UN investigation into who's behind Nordstream II. It's both their countries infrastructure after all.
    1
  18612. Yes, many foreign companies come to China and set up shop here, and require access to Western websites, so the government issue VPN licence to these companies, to legally use VPN.
    1
  18613. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    1
  18614. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18615. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  18616. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18617. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18618. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18619. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18620.  @aribethdetylmarande8228  So to sum it up, since China has experienced massive development, alleviation of poverty, transforming a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in past, into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure, then why not allow the Communist Party of China to continue governing our country? China's political system has shown to be viable for our country and extremely successful to boot, so why abandon our political system and adopt democracy? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  18621.  WINNIE THE FLU  China has beaten the US in the battle for world opinion over the handling of coronavirus, according to new polling, with only three countries out of 53 believing the US has dealt with the pandemic better than its superpower rival. Source: Only three out of 53 countries say US has handled coronavirus better than China theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/15/only-three-out-of-53-countries-say-us-has-handled-coronavirus-better-than-china The 53-country survey of 120,000 people by the German polling firm Dalia Research and the Alliance of Democracies Foundation, an organisation headed by the former Nato secretary general Anders Fogh Rasmussen, reveals deep dissatisfaction with US leadership.
    1
  18622. @C B What makes you think nobody in the world is interested in China anymore? According to World Tourism Rankings, China is the 4th most visited country in the world, after France, Spain and the United States, seeing some 62.9 million international tourists in 2018. Source: World Tourism Rankings wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings#Most_visited_destinations_by_international_tourist_arrivals China is also the most popular tourist destination in Asia, surpassing even other Asian destinations like Japan, Korea, India, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, etc.
    1
  18623.  @powerfulstrong5673  The Kuomintang received plenty of U.S military aid, but corruption was rampant within the KMT and they pocketed some $750,000,000 worth of U.S military aid, until even the then US President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves." Source: "President Truman wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves" having stolen some $750 million dollars of US funds" voltairenet.org/article177063.html
    1
  18624. Rioters should not be allowed to escape the law. Why do you stoop so low as to defend rioters?
    1
  18625.  @alex4863  Just because I'm talking about the Hong Kong rioters, implies that I am ignoring the peaceful protestors? And law enforcement is certainly not cheap (especially if its been going on full scale for more than 3 months) so why can't the Hong Kong government implement anti-mask law so that rioters won't get away with damaging HK public property? And many Western countries (like Canada) also have anti-mask laws in protests so what's the big deal? If you're protesting peacefully, why the need for masks? But it makes it easier for HK police to apprehend those rioters with intentions of vandalising public property and causing harm.
    1
  18626.  @alex4863  If you are peaceful protestors, then why wear a mask? You are allowing those rioters with intention to cause harm, to mingle in crowds and hide among the peaceful protestors, so why allow these criminals to escape? If you have no intention to vandalise and damage public property, and just want to protest peaceful, then why wear a mask then? Isn't it your purpose to be heard after all?
    1
  18627.  @alex4863  Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former colonies, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration, just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  18628. Western propaganda is spreading Red Scare (fear of communism) and Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overwhelming the West) through such a narrative.
    1
  18629. Meanwhile, the U.S can just print more dollars out of thin air to pay for their rising debt.
    1
  18630. Many Indians (but not all) still suffer from the "colonial mentality", that worships Anglo-Saxon culture while harboring disdain for anything "non-white". Even after British decolonization, the "decolonization of the mind" still needs time to heal the mental damage that colonization inflicts onto the minds of the colonized.
    1
  18631.  @dannycrockett9878  How is mainland China crushing dissent in Hong Kong? Hong Kong clearly have their own government separate from the mainland and despite ongoing anti-mainland protests in Hong Kong for 6 months, Beijing hasn't even lifted a finger in Hong Kong's affairs so how is Beijing crushing Hong Kong dissent?
    1
  18632.  @Renaissance861 Russia had that military intervention in Crimea and annexed it from Ukraine, and all Washington did was impose sanctions on Moscow that's all. No military action by USA against Russia on behalf of Crimea. So would USA even be willing to go to war with mainland China over the island of Taiwan? A survey shows that only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers actually fighting to defend Taiwan. Source: Polls show only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/2156237/what-would-us-do-if-beijing-decided-take-taiwan-force
    1
  18633.  @Randolph1233  How is China bullying USA? China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  18634.  @sureshkandasamy4972  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Tibet broke free of China in 1913 but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951 so why should China give up our ancestral lands? Because foreigners say so? And Xinjiang was part of China since before the religion Islam was even born. Xinjiang was known as Xiyu (西域) under the Han dynasty 200 BC, so Xinjiang was part of China even before Jesus Christ himself was born.
    1
  18635.  @sureshkandasamy4972  Hong Kong has separate constitution from the mainland, separate government, separate passport, separate currency, yet Hong Kong is part of China under the One Country, Two Systems Policy. And did you read Taiwan's own constitution? Taiwan constitution says that Taiwan is part of China under the One China policy. Since there's been no modifications to Taiwan's constitution, then by default Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  18636.  @readyandwaitingwithasupris3693  Americans have never been more divided than they are today. Everything is so polarised, whether it's the Republicans and the Democrats, those Pro-Trump and against Trump, those protesting lockdown and those who don't want to reopen too soon, or the Left Wing and Right Wing (till today, I still don't know how to define those terms). Tensions in America are stretching the fabric of American society to the limits, even when the coronavirus pandemic calls for unity among Americans.
    1
  18637.  @readyandwaitingwithasupris3693  The Chinese government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and halt production, closing tourist attractions, imposing lockdown, banning mass gatherings, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and contain the virus. Now it's finally paying off that the virus is under control in China and we are cautiously reopening our economy. But in Western countries like US and UK, their economies are far too precious to sacrifice so human health has to be sacrificed instead. Donald Trump wants to reopen the economy and Boris Johnson is relying on "herd immunity" to the pull through. So human lives have to be sacrificed instead of the economy.
    1
  18638.  @readyandwaitingwithasupris3693  Why should China care about Cambodia's internal affairs as long as they don't affect China-Cambodia relations? You claim the USA is so great, why doesn't USA send a medical team to investigate Cambodia.
    1
  18639.  @readyandwaitingwithasupris3693  Here's a social experiment to see how Americans treat Chinese in America and also how Chinese treat Americans in China. Video: How American and Chinese treat foreigners differently youtu.be/04sTkhTRmWE In this social experiment, the Americans were mostly rude and unhelpful towards Chinese, whereas the Chinese were mostly polite and helpful. Chinese even offered to escort the man to the nearest police station, after learning that he had lost his wallet.
    1
  18640.  @readyandwaitingwithasupris3693  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  18641.  @readyandwaitingwithasupris3693  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA. The test is given every three years to 15-year-olds around the world and measures their knowledge in reading, science and mathematics. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    1
  18642.  @readyandwaitingwithasupris3693  Chinese universities produce the most STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) out of any other country in the world. Countries With The Most STEM Graduates 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/02/02/the-countries-with-the-most-stem-graduates-infographic/ This implies that China is going to play a much larger role in the STEM fields, given the sheer number of graduates produced in these fields.
    1
  18643.  @readyandwaitingwithasupris3693  China publishes more scientific research papers than any other country in the world. For the first time, China has overtaken the United States in terms of the total number of science publications, according to statistics compiled by the US National Science Foundation (NSF). Source: China declared world’s largest producer of scientific articles nature.com/articles/d41586-018-00927-4 The agency’s report, released on 18 January, documents the United States’ increasing competition from China and other developing countries that are stepping up their investments in science and technology.
    1
  18644.  @readyandwaitingwithasupris3693  China is home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) and Tianhe-2 (天河-2) and in 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Video: Sunway TaihuLight named world's fastest supercomputer youtu.be/KEdsrT1mFAU Source: China surpasses US in supercomputers usage on Top500 list cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion). This implies that researchers in China have access to some of the most advanced facilities in which you conduct their research.
    1
  18645.  @readyandwaitingwithasupris3693  Besides fast supercomputers, China is also home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    1
  18646.  @readyandwaitingwithasupris3693  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  18647.  @readyandwaitingwithasupris3693  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    1
  18648.  @readyandwaitingwithasupris3693  Chinese scientists have developed a new type of brain-inspired chip that allows riderless autonomous bicycle to detect and track targets, avoid obstacles, and is self-balancing. Video: Chinese scientists develop new type of brain-inspired chip youtu.be/my7CXcYw-ss The chip was developed by a research team in China's Tsinghua University
    1
  18649.  @AmitSingh-vi8jk  Starts killing their leaders? Which Tibetan leader did the communist party kill? The Tibetan government themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) for short in 1952. The agreement is valid since it was signed by Tibetan government, so what killing of leaders are you talking about? Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CCP, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    1
  18650.  @AmitSingh-vi8jk  The 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and a traitor to his people. Declassified CIA files have revealed that the 14th Dalai Lama secretly accepted funding from the CIA to train guerrilla Tibetans in covert separatist activities against the central government. A total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the CIA Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) - Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) Source: CIA Tibetan program wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Costs American CIA has been secretly sponsoring separatist activities in Tibet against the mainland and only after the CIA files been declassified that this interference has been revealed. Who said that foreign media aren't allowed inside Tibet? Here's a video (by WildFilmsIndia) of Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, China and contrary to common misconceptions, Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, running water, gas and electricity, as well as modern technology like cars, smartphones, computers, Internet, WiFi, online shopping and so on. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like! (By WildFilmsIndia) youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo
    1
  18651.  @AmitSingh-vi8jk  What do you even know about politics? I gave you declassified CIA documents showing that 14th Dalai Lama was sponsored by the American CIA in separatist activities against the central government, yet you claim its all propaganda? The 14th Dalai Lama even remarked that America did not care about Tibetan interests, America just wanted to destabilise all communist governments. In his 1991 autobiography Freedom in Exile, the 14th Dalai Lama criticized the CIA for supporting the Tibetan independence movement "not because they (the CIA) cared about Tibetan independence, but as part of their worldwide efforts to destabilize all communist governments". In 1999, the Dalai Lama claimed that the CIA Tibetan program had been harmful to Tibet because it primarily served American interests, claiming "once the American policy toward China changed, they stopped their help". In this time with the CIA supporting the Tibetan people it was the CIA and American policy to keep the Chinese occupied with resistance or as the CIA put it dealing with them would be a nuisance and keep the Chinese busy. The CIA's involvement in Tibet was never focused on it becoming independent from China but to gain intelligence on them and fight Communism. Source: CIA Tibetan program wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Criticism This is supported by the fact that after US President Nixon's 1972 visit to Tibet, the Americans stopped caring about Tibet. Today, the Tibet Autonomous Region is part of the People's Republic of China as recognised by the USA.
    1
  18652.  @manojattri9339  Ancient Chinese invented gunpowder and gunpowder weapons like handcannons, handgrenades, fragmentation bombs, landmines, naval mines, exploding cannonballs, rocket launchers, multi-launch rockets, and of course, fireworks. Americans celebrate the 4th of July with Chinese inventions, and world's oldest conformed surviving firearm is the Heilongjiang 黑龙江 handcannon, manufactured no later than 1288. Source: Heilongjiang hand cannon wikipedia.org/wiki/Heilongjiang_hand_cannon A 14th-century military treatise, the Huolongjing (Fire Dragon Manual), describes hollow cast iron cannonball shells filled with gunpowder. The wad of the mine was made of hard wood, carrying three different fuses in case of defective connection to the touch hole. Source: Landmine wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_mine#Gunpowder Chinese records tell of naval explosives in the 16th century, used to fight against Japanese pirates (wokou) wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_mine#History Source: The earliest rocket launchers documented in imperial China consisted of arrows modified by the attachment of a rocket motor to the shaft a few inches behind the arrowhead. wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket_launcher#History Source: The first multiple rocket launchers were made during the mediaeval Chinese Song dynasty. wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_rocket_launcher#History There's even a Chinese flamethrower capable launching a continuous stream of fire at enemies, which must have been terrifying to behold. Video: Chinese Flamethrower Video For Project youtu.be/oSFdXTJKUP0
    1
  18653.  @AmitSingh-vi8jk  I cited you a video by WildFilmsIndia, depicting modern Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, China. Here's a travel vlog by Canadian tourist (Vafa Anderson) on his visit to Lhasa. Video: Welcome to Lhasa Tibet - Exploring the City (By Vafa Anderson) youtu.be/J-TfN56ETVM He took the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) and explains how each carriage comes equipped with it's own oxygen tank, because of low oxygen environments in the Himalayas. In Lhasa, you can see so many religious Tibetans praying, performing full-body kowtows, and spinning those "prayer tops" in prayer. The Canadian tourist was in Lhasa in 2006 and 10 years later (in 2016) he remarked how much Tibet has changed in a decade. Who says that the Communist Party of China is constantly killing Tibetans and changing the demography? Tibetans and other ethnic minorities are not affected by the One Child Policy unlike the Han and Tibetans can have as many kids as they want. The population of Tibetans in China has actually increased over the years. Population of Tibetans in China (1953–2010) 1953: 2,775,622 1964: 2,501,174 1982: 3,821,950 1990: 4,593,072 2000: 5,416,021 2010: 6,282,187 Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups So from 1953–2010, the population of Tibetans in China actually increased from 2,775,622 to 6,282,187, so how is the CPC killing Tibetans?
    1
  18654.  Caп¡s Aпuв¡s  Previously, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule from 1841-1997 (excluding 3 years of Japanese occupation) and during which, Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held in Hong Kong by it's people. Only during the period of Hong Kong's handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to the mainland that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as British colony?
    1
  18655.  @DippinSauc  You claim Taiwan is independent then where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed the declaration and when was it signed? If not then according to Taiwan's constitution, Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  18656.  @DippinSauc  Where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence like I asked you? Who signed the declaration and when was it signed? And China allows multiple systems to exist within our borders. For example, Hong Kong have their own currency (Hong Kong dollar) their own Hong Kong passport, Hong Kong National Emblem, and Hong Kong Basic Law, yet Hong Kong is part of China under the One Country, Two Systems Policy. Since you can't produce Taiwan's formal declaration of independence, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  18657.  @DippinSauc  You can't answer my question, so you resort to hurling personal insults against me for my views? China today is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, having world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Where's Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, its manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to be the mainland (Made-in-Taiwan used to be commonplace, but it's been largely replaced by Made-in-China) Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and instead, it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan today has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    1
  18658.  @DippinSauc  Why can't you give me Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Since there have been no amendments to Taiwan's constitution then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  18659.  @DippinSauc  The Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. All verified eyewitness accounts say that Nothing Happened and the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing’s iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time — among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    1
  18660.  @DippinSauc  Granted, the Communist Party of China is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  18661.  @DippinSauc  Why can't you produce Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed the declaration and when was it signed? If not then according to Taiwan's constitution, Taiwan is part of China as written in their constitution.
    1
  18662.  @DippinSauc  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china
    1
  18663.  @DippinSauc  How is Taiwan better than the mainland? Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  18664.  @DippinSauc  Where's all the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? Take Xiaomi for example and Xiaomi was started in 2010. Today it's one of the world's most popular smartphones. In India, it's number one. Video: How Xiaomi broke out of China to go global | CNBC Reports youtu.be/291DlKa7iIU But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland? You keep proclaiming Taiwan's independence but where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed the declaration and when was it signed? If not, then Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  18665.  @DippinSauc  Who said number of companies define sovereignty? I'm asking you how is Taiwan better than the mainland that's all. Besides smartphones, Chinese companies also dominate the civilian drone industry and Chinese company DJI is world's largest civilian drone-maker according to the following source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 top10drone.com/top-drone-companies/ But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? You keep saying Taiwan is independent, but where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? Since you repeated failed to produce Taiwan's declaration of independence, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  18666.  @DippinSauc  Why can't you answer my questions of "Where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed?" You failed to produce Taiwan's declaration of independence, so by default, according to Taiwan's constitution, Taiwan is part of China. Why don't you go and read Taiwan's own constitution?
    1
  18667.  @DippinSauc  Why don't you show how Taiwan is better than the mainland? Take smartphones for example and Xiaomi was started in 2010. Today it's one of the world's most popular smartphones. In India, it's number one. Video: How Xiaomi broke out of China to go global | CNBC Reports youtu.be/291DlKa7iIU But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  18668.  @DippinSauc  You repeatedly failed to produce Taiwan's declaration of independence, then what more needs to be said? And you can't even show how Taiwan is better than the mainland. Besides smartphones and drones, China is home to many of the world's largest banks including ICBC, China Construction Bank, AgBank, Bank of China, Bank of Communications, Postal Savings Bank of China, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank (China), Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, China CITIC Bank, China Minsheng Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Hua Xia Bank, Bank of Beijing, China Guangfa Bank, Bank of Shanghai, Bank of Jiangsu, China Zheshang Bank and so on. Source: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks#By_total_assets But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  18669.  @DippinSauc  Stating what facts? You consistently failed to produce Taiwan's formal declaration of independence so by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. That's a fact you seemly can't comprehend and neither have you shown how is Taiwan better than the mainland.
    1
  18670.  @DippinSauc  Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  18671.  @DippinSauc  Why resort to abusing vulgarities against me for my views? You still haven shown Taiwan's formal declaration of independence or who signed it and when it was signed, so you're the one who failed to state facts. And where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? Check out Huawei P30 Pro Camera, capable of not just 10x or 20x or 30x but a whopping 50x zoom. From a high-rise building, you can zoom in 50x on a faraway chess match on the ground below. Video: Huawei P30 Pro ZOOM 50X Feature youtu.be/SeSzNxb1Eyw But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  18672.  @DippinSauc  Yes mainland China has Sina Weibo, Alibaba, Tencent, WeChat and so on, but where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? And why can't you give me Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? You got nothing for that? Then Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution, since there have been no amendments to Taiwan's constitution.
    1
  18673.  @DippinSauc  China has produced successful Internet companies like Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, Suning.com, Bytedance (Tik Tok), Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, Kuaishou, Trip.com, Pinduoduo, Sina Corp, Sohu and so on List: List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies#List But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland? You can't even produce Taiwan's formal declaration of independence like I asked you to, so by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  18674.  @ccp_fact_checker  What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  18675.  @ccp_fact_checker  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china
    1
  18676.  @ccp_fact_checker  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  18677.  @sweetrain9482  Every country needs a National Security Law. Under Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 (香港基本法第二十三條) Hong Kong needs a National Security Law to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government (aka Beijing).
    1
  18678. (This comment thread has now been locked by order of the Communist Party of China)  @icte3335  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then Taiwan is part of China by default.
    1
  18679.  @olcankanicok9125  USA sanctions Russia because Russia annex Crimea from Ukraine. USA sanctions North Korea because of missile tests. USA sanctions Iran because of failed nuclear deal, USA sanctions Venezuela because they don't want to sign up to petrol dollar. USA sanctions Cuba because of missile crisis, why don't you ask the USA not to sanction so many countries?
    1
  18680.  @olcankanicok9125  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    1
  18681.  @olcankanicok9125  China is home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) and Tianhe-2 (天河-2) and in 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Video: Sunway TaihuLight named world's fastest supercomputer youtu.be/KEdsrT1mFAU Source: China surpasses US in supercomputers usage on Top500 list cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion).
    1
  18682.  @olcankanicok9125  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  18683. This comment thread is now locked by order of the Communist Party of China
    1
  18684.  Blaine Brown  Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution, how can China invade our own country? Any conflict will a resumption of the unfinished Chinese Civil War, an internal war within China, not an invasion of another country.
    1
  18685.  @sureshkandasamy4972  All those places are currently part of the "People's Republic of China" today. Even if you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Otherwise where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed?
    1
  18686.  @sureshkandasamy4972  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    1
  18687.  @sureshkandasamy4972  Here's a vid of modern day Lhasa, Tibet, China (filmed by WildFilmsIndia) and you can see how developed Lhasa has become under communist party rule. Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, and modern technology like cars, telephone cables, computers, smartphones, WiFi, the Internet, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo (By WildFilmsIndia) Even the poorest Tibetan farmer can afford a smartphone, connect to the Internet and shop online in Taobao and have his purchases shipped all the way to Tibet in the Himalayas. Because Tibet is part of China after all.
    1
  18688.  @zhouyou28  "Their only legitimacy to rule China is promise economy prosperity." It's true that this is being tested right now, but the majority of Chinese citizens continue supporting the government's policy of lockdown being a necessity. Only time will tell, but if it's successful, then the Communist Party's legitimacy would be reinforced further.
    1
  18689. +Robert Hardy said "But that constitution was not written by the Taiwanese, it was written by the Chinese invaders in 1949" Are you perhaps referring to the Taiwanese Aboriginals? The Han Chinese invaders in 1949 (KMT) weren't the first Han Chinese in Taiwan, and throughout the history of Taiwan, it has been under Dutch Rule, Qing Rule, even Japanese Rule for 50 years, and now currently Republic of China Rule. But you have to at least acknowledge that the Taiwanese aboriginals have since lost control of their island (similar to how Native Americans have lost control of America to the British, and now the non-Native Americans)
    1
  18690. +Sam Shyam If Taiwan doesn't accept communist and authoritarian rule of mainlanders, then China has offered to extend the One-China, Two-Systems policy to allow the mainland to keep our government and Taiwan to keep theirs, while reunifying as a single China. Under the policy, its as though North Korea and South Korea agree to be part of a unified Korea, but allow both parties to keep their own separate governments. But Taiwan rejected China's offer, and is yet to come up with a counterproposal of its own.
    1
  18691. +Robert Hardy You've been waiting 70 years already and even the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, whereas the Chinese Communist Party is still around. I mean, which Western country in the world is willing to support 2 systems within its borders, you tell me? China is the only country in the world to have such a policy with One Country, Two Systems.
    1
  18692. +Robert Hardy Why do you think mainland Chinese aren't free? Every country in the world has had tourists from China visit their lands. In your schools and universities there are international exchange students from China studying same topics as their peers. In research institutions worldwide there are Chinese scientists collaborating with foreign companies in R&D sectors.
    1
  18693. +Robert Hardy Even in Western country, the government can take away your passport too, so what difference does it make? Who are these millions of Chinese people having their passports taken off of them? And who says you get arrested for making a political joke on WeChat? At the most, they will just take the offending post down that's all. And China has 1.4 billion people, yet we aren't allowed to have a political opinion? Who says so? You think all 1.4 billion Chinese people have the same political opinion? Also, did you see Taiwan's latest midterm election results? The pro-independence DPP just suffered major defeat, losing two of its major posts to KMT, and even the pro-independence Taiwan President Tsai just resigned from her post, because of this humiliating defeat. So doesn't this imply that the people of Taiwan don't support independence? At least, the majority in this election?
    1
  18694. +Robert Hardy You're not even from Taiwan yet why are you seemingly speaking on behalf of Taiwan?
    1
  18695. +J Richo Its true that Western countries are importing a lot of Muslim refugees (especially Europe), much to the disgruntlement of Europeans and I don't understand why Western governments just allow the immigrants to step all over their laws. For example, in Europe, the Muslim immigrants are under little pressure to assimilate into their predominantly Christian host country and they still retain their old traditions (such as women wearing headveil in public) and many locals are secretly angry at this, but they are reluctant to voice their true opinion, for fear of being labelled "racists" or "Islamophobe" (fear of Islam). But the Muslims take this silence as acceptance of their traditions and culture in Europe. Moreover, non-Muslims have to convert to Islam when they marry Muslim (whereas being Christians is a matter of choice) and that's how Islam propagates in Europe. And the Caucasian families are becoming smaller due to lower birth rate and fertility rates, while Muslim families are huge (especially if they have 4 wives) and they are bringing their entire families over to Europe and changing the population demographics overtime. The thing is, why don't you using your democracy and vote for your leaders to ban/reduce immigration from Muslim countries? I mean you people claim to be FREE and able to vote for your own leaders and government, then why aren't you doing so? Don't you have control over your own government after all?
    1
  18696.  @ttomtkh  Which land has been grabbed? If you want to talk about land grabbers, then the United States literally have stolen lands from Native Americans and occupied them even till today.
    1
  18697.  @perrychrispy1  "神州 Shenzhou it’s wrong because it isn’t a real democracy now is it?" Hong Kong had been ruled by authoritarian British Colonial dictartoship for 150 years, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy any democracy, and virtually zero elections where held in Hong Kong by its people, while it was still a British Colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover to mainland China, did people of Hong Kong finally get to vote in elections for their favorite leaders. So isn't it thanks to China that Hong Kong people today finally get some sort of democracy, when it had none under authoritarian British colonial rule?
    1
  18698.  @perrychrispy1  Without a proper extradition treaty, Hong Kong might become a safe haven for criminals, who can commit crimes in other countries then flock to Hong Kong to avoid capture and extradition. It has happened once already with that HK murderer Chan, so it can happen again, since the loophole has been exposed already so criminals know about it. Why not pass the HK extradition bill and cover up this legal loophole that exists? Do the Hong Kong protestors who are mostly school kids even understand what they are protesting about? Have their teenage minds read the bill themselves and understood real world politics?
    1
  18699.  @leezhieng  Agree with you. Saudi Arabia Crown Prince actually expressed support for China right to fight terrorists in our country. Source: Saudi crown prince defends China's right to fight terrorism aljazeera.com/news/2019/02/saudi-crown-prince-defends-china-fight-terrorism-190223104647149.html
    1
  18700.  Jay  According to World Tourism Ranking China is world's 4th most visited country after France, Spain and United States, seeing some 60.7 million international visitors. Source: World Tourism Ranking wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings China is also the most popular tourist destination in Asia, surpassing other Asian tourist destinations like Japan, Korea, Thailand, India, etc. Even Hong Kong sees less international visitors as compared to mainland China. 1. China (60.7 million) 2. Thailand (35.4 million) 3. Japan (28.7 million) 4. Hong Kong, China (27.9 million) 5. Malaysia (26.0 million) 6. Macau, China (17.3 million) So why do you claim mainland China is a dump, when we are the 4th most visited country in the world?
    1
  18701. @Dr _11 The people in Hong Kong were under authoritarian British Colonial rule for over 150 years, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and there were virtually no elections. And its actually thanks to China that Hong Kong finally granted democracy after the handover from Britain, so shouldn't the people of Hong Kong be grateful to the mainland, that they finally can vote in HK elections?
    1
  18702. @Dr _11 What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending money on your economies. Your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. Source:  China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 China now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese people can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  18703. @Dr _11 If Hong Kong doesn't pull through with the extradition bill amendments, than Hong Kong will become a safe haven for criminals, who can commit crimes in countries Hong Kong doesn't have extradition treaty with, and then escape to Hong Kong to flee capture/extradition. It has happened once with Chan and it can happen again, as more potential criminals learn of this legal loophole in Hong Kong's system.
    1
  18704.  @tuchan3195  没用过翻译软件。你觉得我的英语怪怪吗？
    1
  18705.  @perrychrispy1  If the British were trying to transition HK into a democracy since the 1950's and mainland China called it a "hostile act" but China was still weak, then what does Britain have to fear from a weakened China in 1950s? The British had literally 150 years to implement democracy in Hong Kong, but they never did, and suddenly when returning Hong Kong to China, they want to implement democracy in Hong Kong?
    1
  18706. @Dr _11 Hong Kong was once a global financial hub and thriving port city under authoritarian British colonial rule for over 150 years, while mainland China was still dirt-poor at that time. Now times have changed and it has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan and is facing increasing competition from upcoming mainland cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian, etc. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage It's because democracy has ruined Hong Kong, and all these protests start appearing and destablised its economy. Investors are spooked and are thinking of leaving Hong Kong because of the on-going protests. Whereas the mainland port cities are flourishing under authoritarian CCP leadership, despite what Western anti-China propaganda has been denouncing all this while.
    1
  18707. @Dr _11 Didn't President Trump "stand with" Saudi Arabia and expressed support for the Crown Prince murder of journalist, Khashoggi, and labeling him as "enemy of the state"? Source: Trump 'stands with' Saudi Arabia and defends crown prince over Khashoggi theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/20/trump-saudi-arabia-jamal-khashoggi-crown-prince It's your country's choice to express support for Saudi Arabia. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia express support for China's anti-terrorism efforts so what's your point? China did not ask for their support, they gave it to us willingly.
    1
  18708. @Dr _11 You are referencing a movie, a work of fiction that was created for entertainment purposes, and claiming China is trying to follow it? Writers and producers of movies need to purposely exaggerate the scenarios, in order to attract viewership so what makes you think reality will turn out like in the movie?
    1
  18709.  @yukikazeization  在清代贩运鸦片是犯法哦，所以清政府强制硝烟难道是做错吗？
    1
  18710.  CRISTIANO RONALDO  Look at the Western countries and they are bending over backwards to accommodate Muslims. Muslim refugees are fleeing their own conflicted-ridden Islamic countries and flooding the West, like United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, etc, and they are under little pressure to adapt into their predominantly Christian host countries, much to the chagrin of local Westerners Instead of assimilating, many Muslims continue their traditions like Muslim men marrying multiple wives, and Muslim women wearing headveil while in public, and secretly, many Westerners are angry about this, but they can't voice their honest opinions for fear of being labelled as "racists" (even though Islam is not a race) or "Islamophobes," because of the culture of "politically correctness" that is gripping the West. At least in China, we are teaching Uighurs to put China 1st and their religion 2nd. We are telling them to put the country over their God/Allah.
    1
  18711.  @lailaheilallah3783  China will fall? That's exactly what Western economists been predicting since 1990s. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. ... But it's already 2019, and China's economy is still going strong. So doesn't that imply Western economist's predictions about China been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    1
  18712. ​ Jay  Your original statement is comparing Hong Kong and mainland China. Even if you subtract the Hong Kong figure from 60.7 million, the mainland still sees more international tourists from Hong Kong, so I have already proved my point.
    1
  18713.  Jay  @Jay During the events of Nanjing, Japanese soldiers butchered Chinese men for sport, and held contests to see who could rack up the most kills. Chinese women were gang-raped and killed, their naked bodies left exposed and mutilated, with their private parts bayoneted or having sharp sticks of bamboo shoved in. The young and the elderly weren't spared, and the Japanese soldier cut open babies bodies to violate them. Pregnant women were raped and had their swollen bellies stabbed, the unborn fetus ripped from their wombs and bayoneted. What did Chinese people do to deserve this? All we wanted to do was to defend our lands and protect our homes and loved ones from the invaders. And you want this to happen everywhere in China?
    1
  18714. ​ @yukikazeization  你觉得英国用鸦片当理由跟中国去打战，难道是对吗？
    1
  18715.  @Walker-ow7vj  Which part of the Sino-British Declaration did China did not respect? Hong Kong today is clearly a democracy, and the Hong Kong Chief Executive (香港特首) is voted into power by an Election Committee (选举委员会) which consists of Hong Kong groups, and all Beijing does is appoint the HK Chief Executive that's all. But Beijing does not cast any votes in HK elections, so which part of the declaration is China not respecting?
    1
  18716. @Dr _11 According to Jay Mathews, reporter for The Washington Post, as far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square and all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. Source: The Myth of Tiananmen archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php
    1
  18717. @Dr _11 As the world's most populous country, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4 times that of USA, China has at least 4 geniuses to every 1 American genius.
    1
  18718. @Dr _11 That footage doesn't look like its from Tiananmen Square. Tiananmen Square is a parade ground where Mao's portrait was hung, after he proclaimed People's Republic of China in 1949, and it is a flat area reserved for military parades and there aren't any huge obstacles like trees.
    1
  18719. @Dr _11 Besides inventing gunpowder, Chinese also invented handcannons, handgrenades, fragmentation bombs, landmines, naval mines, exploding cannonballs, rocket launchers, multi-launch rocket systems and of course, fireworks. Americans celebrate the 4th of July with Chinese fireworks, and there was even an ancient Chinese flamethrower capable of launching continuous stream of flame (the first of its kind) which must have been a fearsome sight to behold in the ancient battlefield. Video: Ancient Chinese Flamethrower youtube.com/watch?v=goi-FVnTD5Y&t=915
    1
  18720.  @Random-IDs  That's just the way the term "The West" is defined, including USA, Canada, EU, Australia and New Zealand. However, OZ and NZ are geographically quite isolated from the rest of the Western world.
    1
  18721.  @Andrew-ib7gs  You're criticising the Barrett's Chinese proficiency, yet you won't tolerate anyone criticising your Chinese proficiency when you wrote Xinjiang as Xiangjiang? You can't take criticism yourself, yet you want to criticise Barrett? Don't you know that people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones?
    1
  18722.  @Birch37  You want to talk about police brutality then look at African Americans getting shot/killed by police officers, such as George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks, and numerous others yet you want to talk about Chinese police brutality?
    1
  18723.  @Andrew-ib7gs  The thing is, I did not "negate your point", I just pointed out that you're okay with criticising the Barrett's Chinese proficiency, but not when I criticise yours? You can dish out criticism but you can't take criticism yourself? Then why are you using ad hominen attacks and throwing stones when you live in a glass house? And with regards to glasshouses and stones, what do you mean when you said: "You live in the world's biggest greenhouse while lobby bricks at people." Greenhouses aren't necessarily glass houses so why'd you bring up greenhouses?
    1
  18724.  @Andrew-ib7gs  If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution (Republic of China_ 🇹🇼), it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of ROC Administrative and Claims. Source: ROC Administrative and Claims wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg
    1
  18725.  @TauLim  This Andrew guy started off hurling ad hominen attacks against the Barrett's Chinese proficiency, but when I criticised his own Chinese proficiency, he starts calling me a troll, so shouldn't he be looking at a mirror here?
    1
  18726.  @Andrew-ib7gs  Hong Kong has their own government separate from the mainland. Hong Kong has their own judiciary system. Hong Kong has their own currency (Hong Kong dollars). Hong Kong has their own constitution (Hong Kong Basic Law). And Hong Kong has their own separate passport (Hong Kong passport). Yet, after the 1997 handover, Hong Kong today is part of China under the One Country, Two Systems Policy.
    1
  18727.  @Andrew-ib7gs  And why is it that you think it's okay to criticise the Barrett's Chinese proficiency, but you can't take criticism yourself when I criticise your Chinese proficiency? You're the one casting stones while living in a glass house. And why did you even mention greenhouse earlier when talking about glass houses? Don't tell me it's another typo mistake of yours.
    1
  18728.  @Andrew-ib7gs  Previously before the 1997, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held in Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's 1997 handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony? And how is Hong Kong not a democracy? What is the definition of democracy? That people get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders? Then Hong Kong is clearly a democracy, because Hong Kong pro-democracy group recently had a landslide victory in their last election, yet this Andrew guy insisted Hong Kong is not a democracy? How? Even Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam won the 2017 election, garnering 777-votes out of the 1200-member Election Committee. The Election Committee consists of entirely Hong Kong groups and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections. None whatsoever. Therefore, I have shown that Hong Kong is a democracy, because the people of Hong Kong cast votes in their elections to elect their favorite leader, when Hong Kong was clearly not a democracy for 150 years as a British colony. I mean, how many elections did Hong Kong have prior to the 1997 handover compared to after? Hong Kong held more elections AFTER the 1997 handover than they ever did for 150 years as a British colony.
    1
  18729.  @Andrew-ib7gs  What's wrong with mainland China's 99% conviction rate? Japan has a 99% conviction rate too, even Canada has a 97% conviction rate. "In Canada, the national conviction rate is about 97%. This does not include cases in which the charges are dropped, which comprise about one-third of criminal cases. Absent Quebec, the province with the lowest conviction rate, the figure is 99%" news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21936807 A low conviction rate is worrying, because it suggests that the cops are arresting innocent people. A high conviction rate suggests that the cops are arresting guilty people. Hong Kong was ranked among the world's freest according to numerous indices of freedom. The Economic Freedom of the World ranks Hong Kong the most freest in 2017 with an index of 8.91. Source: Economic Freedom of the World wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_Freedom_of_the_World#2017_ratings_in_2019_Annual_Report In 2019, the Index of Freedom in the World ranks the freest countries/regions were New Zealand (8.88), Switzerland (8.82), and Hong Kong SAR, (8.81). Highest ranking in economic freedoms were Hong Kong (8.91) and Singapore (8.71). Source: Index of Freedom in the World wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Freedom_in_the_World
    1
  18730.  @matthewmorgan7106  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  18731.  @sebg5145  Because different countries have different marketing strategies. In USA, they favor featuring minorities in prominent light, whereas that's not the case in China, we don't care whether you have an actor of African descent in the frontline. John Boyega portrait was shrunk (but not to the point of being "barely noticeable" like you exaggerate) in order to make way for spacecrafts and BB8, in hopes of enticing people to buy Star Wars toys. The earlier Star Wars movies didn't have the history like they had in China, that's why Chewbacca was taken out, because Chinese audiences would be thinking who the heck is this creature? Ultimately, the Chinese marketing strategy is catered to suit China's audiences, not Western audiences, where they champion featuring minority groups prominently.
    1
  18732.  @sebg5145  Back to the Future is Not Banned in China. It is available on two major Chinese streaming service: Tencent Video and iQiyi.
    1
  18733.  @wmjohns881  But if Chinese government did not muzzled the whistle-blowers, then the whistle-blowers would spread panic in Wuhan, causing millions to flee Wuhan and spread the contagion throughout the world, so didn't China do the right thing by controlling the flow of information? Otherwise what do you expect China to do?
    1
  18734.  @Tenzin3Two  China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. Western countries had plenty of info regarding Covid-19 from China and WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    1
  18735.  @Tenzin3Two  Except for chartered flights, no international passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since its lockdown on January 23, People's Daily learned exclusively from the Hubei Airport Group Company Source: No international commercial passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since lockdown: Airport authority news.cgtn.com/news/2020-07-11/No-international-passenger-flights-departed-from-Wuhan-since-lockdown-S2T0tDumyc/index.html China had lockdown Wuhan, and the Chinese government rushed to built a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised. Video: Huoshenshan: the hospital built in 10 days in China over coronavirus outbreak youtu.be/l2QfufpwfdY The Chinese government also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. Video: Time-lapse video shows how Leishenshan hospital completed in 12 days youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk This shows that China was taking the Covid-19 situation seriously, yet many Westerners laughed at China's misfortune and mocked China's temporary hospitals as "draconian" Yet you want to blame China when the West didn't respond to what China is doing? Video: Once upon a virus... youtu.be/Q5BZ09iNdvo?t=5
    1
  18736.  @namelesssnitchy  What makes you think Chinese trains aren't safe? Here's videos of foreigners travelling first class on board Chinese trains. Video: Bullet Train FIRST CLASS in China youtube.com/watch?v=hxOFP9Q8kBE Video: FIRST CLASS Bullet Train in China youtube.com/watch?v=_sAF-XiX5Dw Video: Our First Class Bullet Train Ride from Beijing to Tongxiang! youtube.com/watch?v=-tlU8QVfOpY
    1
  18737.  @namelesssnitchy  Previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under the authoritarian rule of colonial Britain, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong while it was a British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's handover, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China, that Hong Kong finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, where they had none before? For 150 years as British colony?
    1
  18738.  @namelesssnitchy  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  18739.  @namelesssnitchy  Hong Kong was once a flourishing port city under British colonial rule, while the mainland was still dirt-poor in the past. Today however, fortunes have reversed and Hong Kong has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan, and is facing increasing levels of competition from other upcoming port cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports Source: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage#2012%E2%80%932017 No wonder why people of Hong Kong are feeling left behind as mainland port cities surpass Hong Kong.
    1
  18740.  @namelesssnitchy  Where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? If not then Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution, since no amendments have been made to Taiwan's constitution. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia,) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Source: Map of ROC Administrative and Claims wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg
    1
  18741.  @namelesssnitchy  Besides fast trains, China is home to two of top five world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) and Tianhe-2 (天河-2) and in 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Video: Sunway TaihuLight named world's fastest supercomputer youtu.be/KEdsrT1mFAU
    1
  18742.  @namelesssnitchy  About poverty in China, According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  18743.  @namelesssnitchy  So where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? According to Taiwan's constitution, Taiwan is part of China. Since it's virtually impossible to amend Taiwan's constitution, then Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    1
  18744.  @namelesssnitchy  About brainpower, China is the world's most populous country, so statistically speaking, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  18745.  @namelesssnitchy  Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA, in all three fields; reading, science and mathematics. PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    1
  18746.  @Andrew-ib7gs  Falun Dafa is just like those Q-Anon cultists who stormed Capitol Hill on January 6th 2021. Only much worst. And who said YouTube is banned in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    1
  18747. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18748. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18749. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18750.  @joelturley4847  Are you paying through Alipay or WeChat Pay?
    1
  18751. Chinese scientists have found a method to convert sand to soil, using a blend of sand, water and a special kind of paste made from plant cellulose. Chinese researchers developed a paste made of plant cellulose, which helps retain water, nutrients and air. It's non-toxic, eco-friendly and affordable. Video: Chinese scientists find way to convert sand to soil youtu.be/idjegdl0L3Y After being treated with the technology, a 1.6+hectare sandy plot has been transformed into fertile land. The plants demand the same amount of water as those grown in regular soil, but require less fertilizer and bear higher yields.
    1
  18752.  @johnnyrommel4113  Here are five prominent American families that got rich in the Chinese opium trade: 1 .The Astor Family. 2. The Forbes Family 3. The Russell Family 4. The Delano Family 5. The Perkins Family ……
    1
  18753.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou so individuals did that. Not all Americans." Did I ever said all Americans? Could you please quote me my words saying all Americans did that?
    1
  18754.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou my family's hands are clean of this." So you or your family never once read a Forbes article? Or never once did business with the other families? What about your grandparents, great-grandparents and great-great-grandparents?
    1
  18755.  @johnnyrommel4113  You said: "You say I did the opium wars." When did I ever accuse you of doing the Opium Wars? Could you please quote me my words saying that I accuse you of doing the Opium Wars?
    1
  18756.  @johnnyrommel4113  You said: "My stance is clear on Hong Kong and Democracy." Previously, Hong Kong was under the authoritarian rule of colonial Britain, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held in Hong Kong while it was a British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's 1997 handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    1
  18757.  @johnnyrommel4113  You said: "I don't think you can blame America for Climate Change issues you mentioned." Why not? Even you yourself admitted that USA holds blame for climate change in your next line. You said: "Our countries share equal blame for that." Westerners been polluting the Earth since 200-300 years ago back when the Western Industrial Revolution started in 1700-1800s. I'm using "Westerners" here because it's the Western Industrial Revolution I'm talking about. Whereas China only industrialised some 50 years ago when Deng introduced economic reforms in late 1970s, yet you're claiming that our countries share equal blame? When Westerners been polluting the Earth far longer than China?
    1
  18758.  @johnnyrommel4113  Ask you American this question: Hong Kong actually thrived under authoritarian British colonial rule. But after the 1997 handover, Beijing introduced democracy to Hong Kong under the One Country, Two Systems policy, and since then Hong Kong actually worsened under democracy since 1997. This implies that democracy isn't suitable for Hong Kong, yet why are you arguing to "Free Hong Kong"? History has shown that Hong Kong actually thrived under authoritarian rule and is suffering today under democracy, yet why are you calling to "Free Hong Kong"?
    1
  18759.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou We admit things that CCP doesn't admit. But the use of coal in both countries…" Then why did you say earlier that "I don't think you can blame America for Climate Change issues you mentioned." even though in the very next line, you yourself said USA holds blame for climate change? Why is it that you can blame America, but you don't think I can do the same? Can't you see your own biased double standards here? And as far as I know, the Communist Party of China has been committed to upholding the Paris Climate Agreement, it was actually the USA that suddenly withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement in 2017, yet you're claiming that you admit things that the CPC doesn't? China is not the one withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement here.
    1
  18760.  @johnnyrommel4113  About the Atlanta shooting, have you seen the Atlanta police reaction? Cherokee Co. Captain Jay Baker said the suspect said "it wasn't racially-motivated" and that the suspect "was having a bad day", trying to humanise the suspect. This is the implicit racism you are talking about, because previously when an African American (Rayshard Brooks) was shot to death in Atlanta by Caucasian police officer, there were Black Lives Matter protests, but when it happens to Asian Americans, it's not racially-motivated? Just because the suspect says so? …… You said: "What I was referring to in China is the way I have seen other Hans speak about Uighur people…" But you were talking about people on these posts not Han people in China. Look, you said (and I quote your own words) "While not from you, some on these posts have referred to Uighurs as "terrorist" and dirty." so you were clearly talking about posts here, not about people on China. But how do you know whether the people who made such posts are Chinese?
    1
  18761.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou regulated media is not free media" And Free Media is Never Free, they have to get sponsorship from rich people, from military-industrial complexes, rich corporations, and they have an agenda too, whether it's to propagate fake news, demonise an adversary, spread rumours, etc. Free Media is under no obligation to disclose their sources, their surveys, their information, they could easily make up fake news and spread them. Because they are unregulated. Look at in 2020, some people started setting 5G Towers on fire, because they were misled by a conspiracy theory that 5G causes Covid-19. Because of fake news, spread by unregulated, so-called "free media"
    1
  18762.  @johnnyrommel4113  It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set, and many economists believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's economy sometime in the foreseeable future. If China can someday surpass the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this eventual goal of ours?
    1
  18763.  @sabulagg  有那么夸张吗？看评论不需要那么认真，可以随便去洗手间哦。
    1
  18764.  @johnnyrommel4113  "Most Americans did not want to leave… Trump really only represents the people that are loyal to him." Back in 2016, it was majority of Americans that voted for Donald Trump to become President of the United States, so President Trump's actions of taking USA out of the Paris Climate Agreement (according to Western democracy) represents the will of Americans, or at least the majority of Americans. I mean, this is all part of Western democracy, you Americans voted for Trump in 2016, so why are you claiming Trump didn't represent majority of American's views? That's what Western democracy is about, isn't it? Since you elected your own President yourselves. Even after the 2020 Presidential Elections, Donald Trump was the 2nd most voted for candidate at 74 million votes compared to Biden's 81 million votes. So Trump represents a significant viewpoint of almost half of all Americans who voted. I'm just using the statistics to show that America is very much divided under Western democracy that's all. And why did you say "We admit to things that CCP doesn't admit"? China had been a member of Paris Climate Agreement all along, we never withdrew from it, unlike USA.
    1
  18765.  @johnnyrommel4113  About combating climate change, Chinese government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions and reduce our reliance on fossil fuels. This shows that China is commited to reducing climate change.
    1
  18766.  @johnnyrommel4113  Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/b8cCsUBYSkw
    1
  18767.  @johnnyrommel4113   @Space Rock  "神州 Shenzhou I will read the rest but more than half Americans voted for Hilary Clinton in 2016." So Donald Trump became President in 2016, despite not being the most popular candidate? Then the problem lies with American political system such that the not so popular candidate became president. And in 2020, Donald Trump garnered 74 million votes, making Trump the 2nd most voted for candidate in America. You can't just dismiss that 49% of American votes sudden don't exist, they clearly exist and represent nearly half American people's feelings. Choosing to dismiss the 49%, means you're just ignoring the divisions that exist in American society that's all.
    1
  18768.  @johnnyrommel4113   About China's commitment to Climate Change, China is the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity, some 856.4 billion kilowatt hours a year – more than double the amount produced by Brazil, in second place. The top three is completed by Canada, which produces 376.7 billion kilowatt hours a year. Countries by hydroelectricity production 1. China (856 billion kilowatts) 2. Brazil (411 billion kilowatts) 3. Canada (376 billion kilowatts) 4. United States (276 billion kilowatts) 5. Russia (161 billion kilowatts) …… Source: Which countries produce the most hydroelectric power? https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/
    1
  18769.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou That is a good question about washing my hands clean." The Individualist culture is literally tearing apart the fabric of American society. Individual rights are over-inflated and infringe upon other's rights. For example, the rights of pro-abortion people infringe on those of anti-abortion people. The rights of LGBTQ versus the rights of anti-gays. The rights of religious people versus the rights of non-believers. The rights of those pro-Trump versus anti-Trump. The Republicans versus the Democrats. The Left Wing versus the Right Wing. America has never been more divided than they are today, you're at each others throats and you wash your hands off the other side. Then how do you expect to unify America when you refuse to acknowledge the 49% of Americans who voted for Trump? You're going to write them all off? That doesn't mean they will disappear if you ignore them. USA doesn't learn from it's mistakes. Racial attacks against minorities have been ongoing for decades and reached a boiling point during the Black Lives Matter protests after George Floyd, so how exactly does USA learn from mistakes? Gun violence and school shootings have been ongoing for decades and USA hasn't changed its gun laws. Source: List of school shootings in the United States wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_school_shootings_in_the_United_States
    1
  18770.  @johnnyrommel4113  Besides hydroelectricity, China also dominates wind power and the Gansu Wind Farm in China is the largest wind farm in the world. Largest wind farms in the world by capacity 1. Gansu Wind Farm (7,965 MW) China 2. Muppandal wind farm (1,500 MW) India 3. Alta (1,320 MW) United States 4. Jaisalmer Wind Park (1,064 MW) India 5. Shepherds Flat Wind Farm (845 MW) United States ……
    1
  18771.  @johnnyrommel4113  World's Largest Wind Farm youtu.be/RLHlswSuP7I
    1
  18772.  @johnnyrommel4113  Besides hydroelectricity and wind power, China also dominates solar power. The current largest photovoltaic power station in the world is the 850 MW Longyangxia Dam Solar Park in China. The largest floating solar farm in the world is located in Huainan City in Anhui province, Eastern China. The floating solar panels are cooled by the water, improving their efficiency as well as saving on land resources, not to saving on burning coal in fossil fuel power plants.
    1
  18773.  @johnnyrommel4113  World's largest floating solar farm in E China youtu.be/qKpYH5SYUeo The largest floating solar farm in the world is located in Huainan City in Anhui province, Eastern China. The floating solar panels are cooled by the water, improving their efficiency as well as saving on land resources, not to saving on burning coal in fossil fuel power plants.
    1
  18774.  @johnnyrommel4113  Why do you keep on bringing your family into this discussion? I don't care about your family which you keep on bringing up, all I said earlier was that some American fortunes were built upon the opium trade in China and I gave examples of such, yet you suddenly bring your family into this argument and try to wash your hands off? Also, apart from reading Forbes articles, how sure are you that you and your family have absolutely no dealings whatsoever with other Americans who profited off the opium trade in China? All the money you earn and used, how sure are you that it didn't come from America's dealing in opium trade in China? It's like you're trying to detach yourself in order to absolve yourself of any blame.
    1
  18775.  @johnnyrommel4113 I never said anything about your dad, what'd I care about your family that you keep on bringing them up? I don't burden you with my family's problems, but why do you keep on bringing your family into this argument? And instead of Gwailo, most mainland Chinese use waiguoren (外国人) to refer to foreigners. Of course Chinese Americans aren't called that, they are called Overseas Chinese haiwaihuaren (海外华人)
    1
  18776.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou Sounds good. But I dont see why you have to keep the blaming me for my dad." When did I ever said anything about your dad? What'd I care about your family that you keep on bringing your family into this argument time and time again? I don't care about your family but why do you keep on mentioning your family here? You sound like those Caucasian Americans who use the excuse of "I'm not racist, some of my best friends are African Americans." the way you keep on bringing your family into this argument time and time again. Waiguoren (外国人) is used to denote people who are foreigners from the perspective of Chinese. Overseas Chinese (海外华人) aren't considered waiguoren in this sense, it's just how Chinese defines such people that's all.
    1
  18777.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou and I know what that word means." While Gwailo is negative, waiguoren (外国人) is neutral, it means 外 (Outside/Foreign) 国 (Country) 人 (Person) and doesn't contain any negative connotations.
    1
  18778.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou Now ask me something about America. ;)" Why is there growing anti-China sentiment in America? I've had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, and I was appalled at the sheer amount of American anti-China propaganda out there. Whenever I bring up China's positive achievements, many Americans just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill, or told me to "Go back to China if you like it there." Many of these anti-China Americans have never set foot in China and see what life is like here for themselves, yet they already harbour negative opinion about our country, because Western MSM been painting negative image of China and "demonising" our country. It's like USA is an open society, but the people are closed-minded. Whereas China is a closed society, but our people are open-minded.
    1
  18779.  @johnnyrommel4113  You said: "Why is there revolutionary rhetoric on your Channel?" Firstly, I choose not to control the comments on my channel. Anyone and everyone is free to post whatever they feel on my channel, pro-China or anti-China, subscribers or non-subscribers, I don't moderate anything on my channel at all. Secondly, I'm not responsible for what people choose to post on my channel, the posts represent the respective people's views, not mine. So many people bring up the alleged Tiananmen Square Massacre in my channel, but that doesn't mean I agree with them, I believe Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British.
    1
  18780.  @johnnyrommel4113  You translated "走我们自己的路，当有一天我们国家的实力碾压他们的时候，再让他们后悔吧!" as "Go our own way, when one day the strength of our country crushes them, let them regret it!" Instead of the word 碾压 in this case meaning "crush" it means to "flatten" the opposition or to have an advantage over opponents in certain aspects. According to Baidu definition of 碾压 "碾压是指通过外力改变物体形态，使某种物体产生“扁”的形变状态。同时也形容相对于对手在某些方面很有优势。" Translated into English: "Flatten refers to changing the shape of an object by external forces, so that an object produces a "flat" deformation state. At the same time, it is also described as having an advantage over one's opponents in certain aspects." It doesn't necessarily mean war through military means, it could be flattening your opponent through games, competition, technology, etc. Not just the militarised definition of "crush".
    1
  18781.  @johnnyrommel4113  You said: "By that rhetoric, can you really say that America is the aggressor? I think not. I assure you no discussions have been made by us like that. Not even at the dinner table with my family." Why just because some random guy (presumably Chinese) posted a random comment on my channel, that suddenly means America is not the aggressor? Just because someone said something on my channel, it excuses the war-like aggression that the USA has displayed repeatedly? What logic is this? Aggression is determined primarily through a country's actions, not words supposedly written by another country. If you claim one single rhetoric on my channel is enough to prove America's innocent, then look at the sheer amount of war-like rhetoric on American media towards China. And once again, why are you bringing your family into this argument? What'd I care about your family that you keep on bringing them up time and time again? Just because you have no such discussion on your table, doesn't mean other American families don't have such discussions on their tables. Again it's another attempt by you to somehow wash your hands clean, and pretend the 49% of Americans that voted for Trump do not exist anymore.
    1
  18782.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou why can't you refute any of my points? And I think you owe me an apology for your words. Family is sacred." I wrote entire paragraphs refuting your points, did you even bother to read what I wrote? Why do think just because some guy (presumably Chinese) wrote 碾压 in my channel, that suddenly USA is not the aggressor? And I never said anything about your dad or family, why do you keep on bringing your family into this argument time and time again?
    1
  18783.  @johnnyrommel4113  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. So which country is the real threat to global peace and stability here?
    1
  18784.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou Who is at war? My hands are clean." You Americans yourselves voted for your own American government (at least the majority), yet why are you trying to wash your hands clean? You Americans elected your own government yet want to wash your hands off America's warmongering attitude? Isn't America supposed to be a democracy where the people are responsible for putting their government in power?
    1
  18785.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou Why should we talk about politics after you offend my family." Why do you keep on bringing your family into this argument? What'd I care about your dad or family that yo you must constantly hide behind your family in this argument? I've been talking about politics all this time, it's you who sudden start shoving your family into my face, just because you can't refute my points on politics. The way you keep on mentioning your Chinese wife sounds like those racist people who always use the same old excuse of "I'm not racist, some of my best friends are African Americans."
    1
  18786.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou Just getting to this. I wanted to clarify that none of your points were actually valid. You wrote a lot of nonsense." I have been answering your relentless barrage of questions, but you answered none of mine, instead you continually try and pose more questions, (especially with regards to posts made on my channel). You're unable to refute my points so you start shoving your family into my face that's all. BTW, if you're talking about your 2 kids you fathered with your Chinese wife, then technically speaking, they are considered mixed blood or half-Chinese. But why do you keep on emphasising your family when I'm talking about politics?
    1
  18787.  @johnnyrommel4113  You said: "You have resorted to personal attacks and mentioned my fatherlessness as a way to prove collective guilt." When did I ever ever bring your father into this argument? All I've done is brought up politics, but you keep on shoving your family into my face time and time again. What'd I care about your family that you keep on bringing them up? I've been talking about politics all this while, but you're unable to refute my points so you just keep bringing your family and dad into this discussion.
    1
  18788.  @johnnyrommel4113 You said: "I mean you keep attacking me for my nationality and my race. You refuse to acknowledge me as a person and keep trying to refute points. I'm just trying to connect." I don't even know what race you are, until somewhere along the way you said you were Caucasian. And all I said was why do you keep on trying wash your hands off America's affairs? Don't Americans themselves vote for their leaders as part of a democracy? Making the people responsible for their government coming into the power? And what's wrong with trying to refute points instead of acknowledging you as a person? Isn't calling you an American already enough to acknowledge you as a person? Are you perhaps an attention-seeking child trying to seek acknowledgement? If you're trying to connect, then YouTube is not a good website to do so, I suggest Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Weibo, etc, if you want to make friends. I'm not here on YouTube to make friends, I'm just here to share my political thoughts and attempt to refute points people brought up that's all.
    1
  18789.  @johnnyrommel4113  You said: "You also refuse to acknowledge any of the aspects that show I’m human and not evil." Nobody said that being human automatically equates to not being evil. Humans ourselves have committed evil, it doesn't necessarily mean that just because one is human that s/he is not evil. Evil itself is a human construct and different people have different interpretations of evil. For example, I think the gunman who shot 8 people to death in Atlanta (6 of whom were Asian women) is evil, yet the Cherokee county officer Baker, tries to humanize the gunman, by claiming it wasn't racism, and that he was at the end of his rope, and he had a bad day. You said: "That’s why you don’t like me mentioning my family, it makes you think of me as a human being. You don’t want to think of me that way because you want to dehumanize me." No, I don't like you mentioning your family because it has nothing to do with the points I brought up. There's no way to even prove that you're married with kids, even if you were unmarried or had you marry someone of a different race, I couldn't care less, I'm talking about politics, not other people's family. But you keep on bringing your family into this argument, because you're unable to refute my points so you hope that you could use your family as a shield. But I did not resort hurling personal insults against your family, the most I did was ask whether they read a Forbes article or not. Yet you said I said your family is the Forbes family? How?
    1
  18790.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou Nope. Mention her to challenge your stereotyping of Americans." She is Chinese American yes, but did she voted for the American government? The one that kept starting wars all over the globe?
    1
  18791.  @johnnyrommel4113  You said: "You really have done your research to try to play at my heartstring of racism. I am very public about my support for BLM. I have been for years." The racist is the one who brought up that he's a Caucasian with a Chinese wife and 2 Chinese kids (although technically speaking they are mixed blood) and now bringing up the fact that I'm Han Chinese. You're the one pointing out races and your family, I'm the one concentrating on mostly politics, but you can't refute my points, so you bring your family and race into the discussion.
    1
  18792.  @johnnyrommel4113  "You forget that if you are Han, your are the "white guy" in China and thus have no complaints on the matter." You don't even know China yourself. Han are arguably the most disadvantaged ethnic group in China. We were subjected to the One Child Policy (now amended to the Two Child Policy) whereas ethnic minorities like Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchu, etc are excluded from the policy and they can have as many kids as they want. Han students face disadvantage in schools in applying for college courses. If say a Han student needs 500 points to apply for a certain university degree, then an ethic minority like Tibetan student needs only 300 points (easier to apply) for the exact same degree. So what makes you think Han have no complains on that matter? Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself, before claiming Han have no complaints in China about our ethnic status?
    1
  18793.  @johnnyrommel4113  You said: "I also mention my family because you attempt to convict me based off my family history. I was not the one who brought this up. Remember? Scroll up, you said that I might be guilty of some privilege if my dad had ever read a forbes article. I explained I never met my dad." Firstly, you brought it up when you said: "神州 Shenzhou my family’s hands are clean of this." That's when you started bringing up your family into this argument. Secondly, since you admitted that you never met your dad, then how can you make the claim that your family's are clean off this, when you never met your father? There is a possibility that your father works for Forbes family (or one of the other American opium-dealing families) then you can't make the claim that your family's hands are clean, when you never met your father. These are all your own words, not mind, I just suggest the possibility that your father may have worked for one of the American opium dealing families that made a fortune at China's expense.
    1
  18794.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou Im not talking to you about politics. And framing is politics btw. ;) Which is what I believe you are accusing me of." You were talking about America not being the aggressor, so how are you not talking about politics? You even mentioned Hong Kong several times, yet you deny talking about politics? And you believe I'm accusing you of framing? When did I ever accuse you of framing? What have you framed me of?
    1
  18795.  @johnnyrommel4113  You said: "So which one of my questions were you answering? Because I don't even recall asking you a question." You asked me "Why is there revolutionary rhetoric on your Channel?" and I have replied succinctly. …… You said "I invited you to ask me questions "about living in America." Scroll up. I wasn't trying to talk about politics on many exchanges." No, not" living in America" you said "神州 Shenzhou Now ask me something about America. ;)" …… You said: "I checked your Chan out. You troll Americans on the regular. What's wrong, you can give abuse but you cant receive it. Your debate style is entirely one sided and I just didnt call you out on it until now for the sake of politeness." Where's your evidence that for your accusation that I troll Americans on the regular? Because some guy (presumably Chinese) posted some comment on my channel? Have you read every single YouTube post that I put out, to confirmed that I troll Americans on the regular? Then why are you basing your accusations seemingly out of a single post on my channel? I don't choose who can post on my channel, anyone and everyone is welcome to post on my channel. Doesn't mean I support every post on my channel.
    1
  18796.  @johnnyrommel4113  You said: "For the record, even though I was messing with you. I am serious about you being a racist. You make assumptions about my character based on my race. That makes you a racist." I didn't even know you were Caucasian until you yourself brought it up, how can I make assumptions about your character base on your race. And you are the one making assumptions about my character base on my race, look at your own words: "You forget that if you are Han, your are the "white guy" in China and thus have no complaints on the matter." But what makes you think Han have no complaints on the matter? We Han are only allowed 1-2 kids in China, compared to ethnic minorities having as many kids as they want, and our Han students face disadvantages during college admission in applying for the same course as ethic minorities. Ethnic minorities also enjoy priority healthcare at hospitals, special tax exemptions and other benefits that Han do not get to enjoy.
    1
  18797.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou Wrong again. My wife is apolitical. And she is from Jiangsu." So you admitted your wife didn't vote in American politics? That's means she's not responsible for electing your America government that caused war across globes then, but you as an American, voted for your warmongering government right? After all, you believe in Western democracy where the people get to choose their leaders, no matter how warmongering their leaders turned out to be? Even back before the Iraq War, the former President Bush had invaded Iraq after accusing Iraq of harbouring Weapons of Mass Destruction based on a small vial of mysterious white powder. But after the Iraq War, no evidence of WMDs were found and that white powder turned out to be washing detergent that's all.
    1
  18798.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou Suuuurrrre. Im the racist for bringing up my family and trying to connect with you on a cultural level. Thats not racism dude. Making assumptions based on my race is racist." Bringing up your family isn't racist, but you constantly point out in my face that she's Chinese, only goes to show that you are yourself distinguishing her by race, so how isn't that racist? A real non-racist won't even bring up his spouse's race at all, yet you've been taking every opportunity to mention her race in this argument. I didn't even know you were Caucasian until you yourself choose to mention it, and it was you yourself who made the assumption that I'm Han (which happen to be correct that's all). Me, I'm discussing politics, which political system works for which country/state whereas you keep the on trying to bring your family into this discussion. Unless you did not read my repeated comments, I've made it clear that I'm not interested in your family, if you want to find someone to connect with, you're always welcome to log on to Facebook, Twitter, Weibo, etc. YouTube isn't the ideal website for connecting.
    1
  18799.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou LMFAO. We have white guys in our country that talk like you. The most privilaged race is "under attack." huh." You're the one who said "Han have no complaints on that matter in China." I am merely disproving it by saying no, Han do have complaints, despite being the majority in China. Just like I'm sure many Caucasians Americans have complaints of their own in America. That's why the whole Trump fiasco happened because of lingering resentment by (mostly) Caucasian Americans that fueled Trump's rise to power. Like I said earlier, Biden administration wants to return to the pre-Trump era but it was the pre-Trump era that led to the Trump era. Trump is merely the symptom, not the cause, the cause is underlying problems with America's system. Unless Americans can resolve the root problems, you'll continue to see division in American society.
    1
  18800.  @johnnyrommel4113  I actually support the One Child Policy, I was merely highlighting that we Han have complaints, which you denied earlier when you said: "You forget that if you are Han, your are the "white guy" in China and thus have no complaints on the matter." In the past China was still dirt-poor country, suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems at that time. Why allow families in China to raise multiple kids, only for them to starve to death, succumb to childhood diseases, and having not enough food, not enough hospitals, and not enough schools to send them all to? Why not make families focus all available resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood, and get him into a good school? According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china Look at India, world's 2nd largest population country, and India is suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems that China once suffered from in the past.
    1
  18801.  @johnnyrommel4113  你买新裤子干嘛？你尿裤了吗？
    1
  18802.  @johnnyrommel4113  As Han, I'm actually rather grateful for ethnic minorities competing with me, because I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad. I know how difficult it is for ethnic minorities to learn Mandarin (national language of China) just as I had a difficult time learning English myself, and I don't blame the ethnic minorities, I acknowledge their efforts if they learn Mandarin and open more opportunities to them. But I also acknowledge that some Han are disadvantaged in China because of preferential treatment by the government towards ethnic minorities. I acknowledge their views and give rise to their side of the story were possible, I don't make sweeping claims like "Han have no complaints about the matter" unlike what you did.
    1
  18803.  @johnnyrommel4113  You said: "Oh and btw. The guys that say that, are Trump supporters. Think about that. You sound like a Chinese version of a Trump supporter." Trump supporters ARE Americans too, isn't it? They have resentment that has gone largely unnoticed fit decades, which give rise to Trump election in 2016. But you constantly try to ignore 49% that voted for Trump, that's why America is so divided today and American leaders are unable to unify Americans (except against China). Trump is the symptom, not the cause. Unless you remove the root cause of discontentment in USA, you are unlikely to see Americans unified. As a Chinese myself, I actually supported Trump's 2020 re-election over Biden's. I think another 4 more years of Trump would be beneficial for China. There were many Chinese people who actually support Trump's reelection, because Trump made China great again.
    1
  18804.  @johnnyrommel4113  So you don't know your dad, then how can you make the claim that your family is clean? You don't know your heritage, so how can you claim you are clean?
    1
  18805.  @johnnyrommel4113  要我恭喜你干嘛？ 用中文哪里有人恭喜自己的？你脸皮很厚啊？
    1
  18806.  @johnnyrommel4113  Ask you American this question: What makes you think allowing ordinary people to participate in elections that will impact the country's future, is a wise decision? Ordinary people are fickle and they make poor voters for several reasons: -Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (i.e. They may not turn up to vote, or they submit blank votes) -Ordinary people may base their vote on emotions, not logic (i.e. Many British don't like immigrants, so majority voted for Brexit) -Ordinary people are susceptible to foreign influences (i.e. Russian interference in US elections) -Ordinary people may simply lack awareness of the country's real political situation, to make informed decisions regarding the country's future. There's a host of other problems associated with democracy, so why not let those who know how to govern, govern? That's what China is doing and look at how successful China is.
    1
  18807.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou Check my last post. I just admitted to manipulating you to give you a taste of your own medicine." So you're admitting to gaslighting all this while?
    1
  18808.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou this preferential treatment you refer is your bias not recognising your own privilege. As a white person in America I accept my privilege and own it." I accept my privilege, I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad thanks to preferential treatment of minorities. However, I also recognise the fact that some Han Chinese are disadvantaged at school, because the government gives preferential treatment to ethnic minorities in China. This is a fact and I accept other Han who voice sucr complaints. But you said "Han don't complain about such matters" which is wrong, because some Han do. And again you keep on mentioning your race, but what about those Caucasian Americans who felt that they were marginalised? What about Trump voters? They are still Americans after all, the fact that you dismiss 49% of voters who voted from Trump is part of the reason why America is so divided today. Because the two sides refuse to acknowledge the other side. Your individualist streak is what's tearing apart the fabric of American society today. Unless you can acknowledge both sides, then Americans will never be unified.
    1
  18809.  @johnnyrommel4113  You yourself said that your family is clean, but since you admitted that you don't know your dad, then how can you say your family is clean, when there's a possibility that your father worked for one of the American families that made a fortune off opium sales in China?
    1
  18810.  @johnnyrommel4113  "What is your proof my hands are dirty?" Earlier you said in Chinese 神州 Shenzhou 几乎所有的老兵都接种了疫苗。我国在这方面做得非常好。:) Which translates to "神州 Shenzhou Almost all the veterans were vaccinated. My country has done very well in this regard. ;)" But the US veterans included American soldiers who killed civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, etc, yet you're winking ;) over this? Isn't that rather insensitive to the victims of American war crimes?
    1
  18811.  @johnnyrommel4113  What advantage? I never made any assumptions about you, you're the one who volunteered information about your family (which I did not ask for). I pointed out that the since you didn't know your father (info which you volunteered) therefore you can't really make the claim that your family is clean, given your uncertainty over your heritage that's all.
    1
  18812.  @johnnyrommel4113  You on the other hand, made assumptions that I'm Han Chinese (which happened to be correct) and you said that "Han don't have any complaints" to which I replied that Han are disadvantaged at school compared to ethnic minorities. The problem is that while I personally aren't affected, since I got to study English abroad, many Han aren't so fortunate and I understand their complaints. Whereas you constantly try to divorce yourself from the Caucasian Americans whom have been disadvantaged, you try to ignore the 49% who voted for Trump, when they are Americans all the same? Unless you learn to listen to both sides, America will continue to be divided instead of unified.
    1
  18813.  @johnnyrommel4113  I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad in the USA, and I was appalled at the sheer amount of American anti-China propaganda out there. Whenever I bring up some of China's achievements, some Americans just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill, or told me to "Go back to China if you like it there!" They acted like they know China better than me, someone who grew up here. It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set, and many economists believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United States' in the foreseeable future.
    1
  18814.  @johnnyrommel4113  You're almost 40 years old (info which you volunteered) yet you don't know what a recession is? Hong Kong's recession is because of the double whammy of Hong Kong riots, driving away tourists and spooking investors to take their money out of Hong Kong. Then Covid-19 came and exacerbated Hong Kong's situation further (but at least it brought an end to the HK riots. Then Beijing enacted the Hong Kong National Security Law, which was what brought order to Hong Kong after years of turmoil.
    1
  18815.  @johnnyrommel4113  Previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong had been under authoritarian British colonial rule, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong while it was a British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy? Even recently, Hong Kong held an election with landslide victory for pro-democracy voters. So how exactly is Hong Kong's voting rights threatened? You're not scared of the HK riots, but the Hong Kongers living in HK are scared. You said: "And Hong Kong is the lynch pin of your economy." How? Back during Hong Kong's handover, Hong Kong made up 25%of China's economy. Today Hong Kong makes up only 2.9% of China's economy, so how is it the lynch pin? Did you actually bothered to do research before making such claims yourself? Xinjiang cotton is arguably the best quality in the world and the claims of forced Uighur labour are not true. Uighurs workers often migrate to Xinjiang during the cotton harvest season and are handsomely paid for picking cotton. Recently, Uighurs drive cotton harvesting machines to harvest truckloads of cotton in Xinjiang. Video: Uighurs driving cotton harvesting machines https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSrtvV1FvxI
    1
  18816.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou And now I know your are a kid. You imply with silence on the matter." I gave you an entire night to respond, but you won't even give me a couple of hours to respond, before claiming that I'm silent on the matter? Why are you so impatient while waiting for a response from me? Because of your ADHD? You said: "At least young enough to care about your image. I'm a POS dude. I dont care about my image too much." If you don't care about your image too much, then why do you keep on bringing your family into this argument with every opportunity, claiming that you're Caucasian marrying Chinese wife and so on? It's clear that you care about your image, you constantly try to preserve your image, even though I don't care. About recession, Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    1
  18817.  @johnnyrommel4113  "神州 Shenzhou cool beans. Going to bed." That's favorite your response.
    1
  18818. India has large labor force, their workers speak English and their government is democratic since 1947. China has large labor force, our workers don't speak English and have communist government since 1949 But in the end USA choose invest in China instead of India. What makes you think USA will suddenly switch to India now?
    1
  18819. +Shantanukumar Maity USA didn't even choose grant India most favored nation status back in 1990s, so what makes you think USA will suddenly do so now? India has so many advantages, such as English speaking workers and democratic status, yet USA completely overlook India and choose invest communist China instead. So why you still living in dream over here?
    1
  18820. Hazzycakes China has many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 15-year plans, 20-year plans, etc, in motion, to chart out China's future and to achieve specific goals by 2020, 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc. For the government to achieve that, we will need a strong leader at the reins to ensure our plans aren't disrupted and to see those plans into fruition. But Western countries like USA, can only make short term plans spanning only about 4-8 years, because they are hindered by presidential term limits. Therefore, they only make plans that expire after their term is over, because they can't guarantee that they will remain in power to make long term plans.
    1
  18821. What's wrong signing your name in Chinese characters, since you are clearly buying property in China? I mean your wife (whom I presume is Chinese) is also signing her name in Chinese characters isn't it?
    1
  18822. +allen teo Westerners also need Social Media also tell them what is wrong. Look at those SJWs telling everyone how to behave.
    1
  18823. Historical Predictions about China by Western journals: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown 2020. NYT: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak 2021 Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  18824. Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. Here is a compiled list of what Western journalists have to say about China's economy. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. At some point, you start to realize Western propaganda is just biased against Chinese economy that's all, and its predictions have been consistently proven wrong for almost 30 years. Yet you still think China's economy is going to collapse at any time?
    1
  18825. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18826.  @lisettegarcia  Well, because proper semantics can determine what you achieved at the negotiation table. Do you care about the hostages being freed (but recaptured later) and civilians being fed (only for bombing to resume afterwards) or do you arrive at a binding deal to secure all of the above without the negative consequences? Negotiation requires proper phrasing of terms to be effective.
    1
  18827. As the two most populous countries in the world, statistically speaking, our countries should have the most brainpower, to make plans, generate ideas and research technology, as well as the most manpower, to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Why then should our countries be boggled down by petty territorial disputes, preventing our countries from cooperating with each other?
    1
  18828. If the USA truly supports the Uighurs against China, then they would be willing to welcome Uighur refugees to America right? Yet the USA has admitted a grand total of zero Uyghur refugees in the past two fiscal years since 2021.
    1
  18829.  @obione69  LOL, I like your sarcasm!
    1
  18830. Trump's words are designed to sound like music the MAGA audience that's all. But even now that he's in power, he still continues the same foreign policy, sending US warships through the Taiwan strait in the guise of "protecting other ships." US troops are still stationed in Syria to "take care of the oil" so nothing much has changed with regards to US foreign policy under the new administration.
    1
  18831.  @yslee1401  Why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland.
    1
  18832. +Jay B And people like you still claim Chinese people aren't free at all... China has world's largest student population so the competition for top schools and higher education in China is extremely fierce and intense. Some students don't make it to local universities, so they travel to overseas universities to study. That's why your Western universities and higher education are flooded with international Chinese exchange students, much to the dismay of your local undergraduates. The Western jobs that could have gone to local graduates might end up going to the Chinese instead, and if Chinese overseas graduates can't find a job, they will always be welcome back to China. Either way, China wins, because Western university spots and jobs that would have otherwise gone to locals Western graduates, go to Chinese instead. If Chinese can't find a job overseas, then they can always return home, thus saving China the resources in educating the student as well as bringing foreign knowledge back with them. If they become Western citizens, well, then there's always a slight chance that they are planted Chinese spies. Who knows. I can't really see how you people are actually happy that Chinese students are flooding your local universities and taking up jobs and citizenship. If I were a Western student, I'll probably be resentful towards Chinese competition. And regarding history of dictatorship, look back even further. Democracy has a long history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed and the Republic of Rome failed. Modern Western democracy only has 100-200 years of history, so there's no guarantee that it will be survive. But China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. Many other human societies followed a system where political power was concentrated in the hands of the few, whether its the nobles (aristocracy) or priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy) This was because such people were educated and politically savvy to make important decisions regarding the countries future, whereas the peasants masses weren't. That's why such dictatorial/oligarchy systems were so prevalent, because they were stable and they worked! Fast forward to today, and in a democracy (or a republic) the ordinary people are mostly just not politically savvy or qualified to make important political decisions regarding the country's future. Look at Brexit for example, and the referendum decided that Britain should leave the European Union. Its because ordinary people mostly vote based on emotions, not logic and their votes carry weight while the minority smart people get outvoted. Therefore why can't China let the people who know how to govern govern?
    1
  18833.  @MarkYeung1  But Ukraine cannot even defend against Russia, and Zelenskyy has lamented the fact that NATO has abandoned Ukraine and refuse to honor his request for a No-Fly-Zone. The USA isn't putting boots on the ground to defend Ukraine, it makes it less likely USA will send troops to do the same for Taiwan, if conflicts breaks out with the mainland.
    1
  18834.  @MarkYeung1  But Ukraine cannot even defend against Russia. NATO has refused to put boots on the ground to defend Ukraine, nor impose a No-Fly-Zone over Ukraine, even Zelenskyy has lamented that Ukraine has been abandoned by NATO.
    1
  18835.  @CyrusJanssen  Many in the West believe that the Russo-Ukraine conflict started a month ago, when in fact, the Donbas conflict had been ongoing since the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukovych by USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Kiev. Over the course of 8 years, over 13,000 people have been killed in the Donbas region by shelling by both sides. Patrick Lancaster (whom you interviewed earlier) has documented footage of civilians in Donbas region being shelled since 2015 if you watched his channel. I'm sure you're keenly aware of Western anti-China propaganda, painting China in a negative light. Have you perhaps considered that Western anti-Russian propaganda is also doing the same thing in their negative portrayal of Russia?
    1
  18836.  @CyrusJanssen  Many in the West believe this conflict started just a month ago, when in fact it had been ongoing for 8 years, costing the lives of 13,000 people. Russia is not starting a war, they're ending one that began in 2014 with the ousting of Ukrainian President Yanukoyvch by USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Kiev.
    1
  18837.  @MarkYeung1  There's no damage to Chernobyl, and the Russian forces reached a deal to allow Ukrainian forces to continue guarding Chernobyl. And Zaporizhzhia wasn't damaged, there was a fire in one of the training facilities outside the nuclear plant, but not the plant itself.
    1
  18838. Cyrus, many Westerners believe that the conflict started just a month ago, when in fact it had been ongoing for 8 years in Donbas. Russia is merely ending a war that began after the 2014 ousting of Yanukoyvch.
    1
  18839.  @sunny_wu  Yes, it's extremely frustrating indeed. Some people like Cyrus are acutely aware of Western MSM deliberately painting China in a negative light to Western audiences. Have they perhaps considered the possibility that the same thing might be happening with Western MSM's portrayal of Russia? There's a reason why RT News and Sputnik Radio were blocked in the EU and other places, it's because they show the other side of the story.
    1
  18840.  @sunny_wu  Yes, it's extremely frustrating indeed. Some people like Cyrus are acutely aware of Western MSM deliberately painting China in a negative light to Western audiences but have they perhaps considered the possibility that the same thing might be happening with their portrayal of Russia?
    1
  18841.  @youxkio  "神州 Shenzhou Have you checked WHY the Azov Batallion exists and is defending that area for 8 years?" The Azob Battalion is a right-wing, neo-Nazi group that was incorporated into Ukraine's national guard. And how are they defending that place when the vast majority of civilian casualties (around 80%) occurred in rebel-held regions in Donbas? You said: "Could it be because some Russian militaristic fashion has been reeling the Donbas area and the Azov battalion is there to prevent the Russian unofficial army to progress more into Ukraine?" What's the name of this "Russian militaristic fashion" that's present in Donbas area? Why is the Azov Battalion targeting civilians in Donbas if that was the case? What "Russian unofficial army" are you talking about? You said: "Could it be/ let's think about it? Convenient truths do not always tell the whole story do they?" Alright let's think about it. What's the name of this Russian group? Otherwise it just appears to be your own speculation that's all.
    1
  18842.  @youxkio  "神州 Shenzhou You mention that Chinese media supply more information that the western media." Yes, because Western MSM Media deliberately leave out the context of the Ukraine crisis, failing to bring up that Ukraine had been killing people in Donetsk and Lugansk for 8 years prior. They also downplay the Nazi elements in Ukrainian military to their audiences.
    1
  18843.  @MarkYeung1  Russian forces had never captured Irpin, it had been under Ukrainian control all this while. Also, you said 50 percent of the infrastructure has been destroyed by the Russia, but it turns out that the Irpin bridge was blown up by Ukrainian forces themselves, not by Russian forces.
    1
  18844.  @MarkYeung1  Putin had announced that Russia has no plans to occupy Ukraine. Even till today, Putin has not made any demands that Zelenskyy step down as President of Ukraine. And earlier you claim Mariupol was nowhere near Eastern Ukraine, when in fact it's in Donetsk. You also claim Russian forces attacked Chernobyl, but where is the damage to Chernobyl? You also falsely claimed that Russian forces attack Odessa, but where is the attack on Odessa?
    1
  18845.  @youxkio  "神州 Shenzhou Look for some independent Russian media, you will find more truthful opinions about the Russian people that may surprise you." According to Russian polls, some 70 per cent of Russian correspondents support Putin and his special military operation in Ukraine. You said: "Stop pushing for undesirable extremism and authoritarian fundamentalism." I'm not doing that, I'm against the Azov Battalion. You said: "Something that China DOES NOT DO, nor is allowed to know by the CCP's corrupt authoritarian and autocratic regime." Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  18846.  @youxkio  The 70 percent Russian pollster was VTsIOM. Just recently, some 83 percent of Russians approved of Putin’s actions as president in a March 24-30 survey of 1,632 respondents, according to the country's leading independent pollster, the Moscow-based Levada Center. "Is the Azov battalion any less nationalist than the battalion on the other side of the frontline?" What's the name of the so-called Russian battalion on the other side of the frontline in the first place? I'm willing to hear you but you can't even give me the name that the Azov Battalion'fighting against. What has the Chinese authorities been doing in classrooms? Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  18847.  @MarkYeung1  Russia is already the world's largest country by land area, for what reason does Russia need more land by occupying Ukraine? Ukraine is also the poorest country in Europe, then for what reasons does Putin have to occupy Ukraine?
    1
  18848.  @youxkio  "神州 Shenzhou You forgot to mention that the political-military forces from the Russian side are an extremist militarist faction trying to impose a puppet regime in the Donbas area" This is the 3rd time I'm asking what's the name of this so-called Russian military force in the Donbas? I am willing to hear you out, but you can't even give me the name of this Russian military fashion, you just blurt out speculations without proof that's all. The Azov Battalion have been shelling civilians since 80% of the deaths occurred on rebel-held territory in the Donbas. "The Azov Battalion is a very small one that does not have direct support from the Ukrainian government." They are literally part of the Ukrainian National Guard for crying out loud. Azov members even boasted that if not for their numbers, the Maidan Protest (that ousted Ukrainian President Yanukoyvch in 2014) would have been a gay parade (sic)
    1
  18849.  @youxkio  "About the CCP, I have watched what the Chinese authorities have been doing either in the Chinese classrooms, Hong Kong, COVID 19, and Xinjiang and also their attitude towards Taiwan." Our students are learning in the classrooms that Hong Kong, Xinjiang and Taiwan are all part of China, and that we regard the people of Taiwan as our fellow Chinese brethren. However, increasingly many Taiwan youth are increasingly losing their historical and cultural root to the mainland. As for COVID-19, China's handling of it has allowed China to contain the outbreak and to minimize deaths of elderly and vulnerable people as much as possible.
    1
  18850.  @MarkYeung1  You said that 50 percent of the infrastructure in Irpin has been destroyed by the Russians, but it turns out that the Irpin Bridge was blown up Ukrainian forces, not Russian forces. You can search the Iprin Bridge if you don't believe me.
    1
  18851.  @youxkio  You told me to consider some "Russian militaristic fashion" that the Azov Battalion is allegedly fighting against in Donbas, yet you've repeatedly failed give me the name of this so-called Russian military force. So how do you expect me to listen to you when all you're giving is your own conjecture?
    1
  18852. You said: "Buying a home costs a fortune," If we look at home ownership rate, today China is a country of homeowners with more than 90% of households owning homes (87% in urban and 96% in rural China) (Clark, Huang, & Yi, 2019). At the same time, more than 20% Chinese households own multiple homes (Huang et al., 2020), higher than many developed nations (e.g. 3%–4% in Australia and Northern Ireland; 13% in the U.S. and about 10% in Britain (Resolution Foundation, August 2017; Paris, 2010; Choi, Hong, & Scheinkman, 2014).
    1
  18853.  @redvine4857  Do you have evidence of the CPC doing that? Meanwhile, the U.S seized 7 billion of Afghan foreign reserves and 300 billion of Russia's foreign reserves
    1
  18854.  Putin's Cock Holster  If you want to talk about prison populations, then it's actually the United States that has the world's largest prison population in the world, so much such that the U.S government sometimes releases convicts back on the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons.
    1
  18855.  @pattysherwood7091  In ancient times, people used gold and precious stones as currency. After China invented paper money, the rest of the world followed (like you are using cash now). What if the rest of the world follows digital currency and leaves cash payments in the past, like they did with gold and precious stones?
    1
  18856. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18857. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18858. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18859. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18860. 我觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18861. 我觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18862.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou So you admit the government crackdown has a negative effect on the economy" Short term perhaps, but in the long term, it will be beneficial because those companies (i.e Alibaba, Tencent, DiDi, etc) lose their monopolistic hold over the market. The government cracking down on anti-competitive practices by these giants will actually increase the level of competition, allow smaller firms to compete with giants. Whereas if you look at the USA, the rich American monopolies like Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon can do whatever they want in their respective industries, either buying up or eliminating competition from smaller American firms.
    1
  18863. It's sad that some Chinese continue to have an inferiority complex. Their minds have been "colonized" – been taught to prefer Anglo-Saxon culture over other cultures, including their own culture. Just as former colonies undergo decolonization, there also needs to be a "decolonization of the mind" for these people.
    1
  18864.  @TeoDP7  "神州 Shenzhou alright, I admit I copied the post from a pro-American from quora." But since you're not even American, I'm curious as to why do you see the need to defend America? The U.S has been involved in multiple wars (even in that post you wrote) and even if America didn't start those wars, it doesn't mean that it wasn't involved.
    1
  18865. No surprise that there is anti-Indian sentiment in Sri Lanka, due to allegations of Indian Peacekeeping force atrocities like rape, committed among the Sri Lanka people during war against Tamil Tigers. Nepal has anti-Indian sentiments according to (therisingnepal.org.np/news/8561 ) as well as in Bangladesh (rediff.com/news/2005/dec/21bspec.htm )
    1
  18866.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou Yes. So far" Then why are you claiming that China doesn't plan for them to fall in the ocean? You have given zero examples of Chinese rocket debris falling on land and not the ocean.
    1
  18867.  @td090  You said: " But hey, half of America thought trump was a good idea...." Look at Biden's botched Afghan withdrawal. Even Trump knows that the proper way to withdraw is to evacuate civilians and military hardware, before finally withdrawing the soldiers. But Joe Biden just withdrew the U.S soldiers and left the civilians and military hardware behind.
    1
  18868. In the West, the AI controls human's minds to affect the virtual world. In China, the humans control AI algorithms to affect the real world.
    1
  18869. They did the same thing back when Japanese companies were rising. They clipped their wings.
    1
  18870. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China according to its constitution.
    1
  18871. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18872. Even the U.S acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18873.  @kammonkam4905  Lu Muying's lung scans did not indicate evidence of pneumonia, so that's why she was classified as asymptomatic. But let's say we take your view that China is under-reporting, then this further reinforces the need for Shanghai to lockdown to prevent any more unnecessary deaths.
    1
  18874.  @kammonkam4905  Are you an U.S citizen yourself? Then can't I compare China with the United States? Cyrus Janssen's channel is primarily about U.S and China after all, then can't I bring up U.S methods to compare with China's?
    1
  18875. My response was because DévanshonCream had claimed that India has better Airforce than China and I am only proving him wrong. Old aircraft or not, MiGs are still being deployed in IAF and many still crashed in the end. I cited the exact dates and locations of each crash, as well as number of deaths of personnel. Even THIS year in 2018, an Indian MiG crash at Goa airport on Jan 03, so what makes you people think MiG crashes won't happen again?
    1
  18876. +Total War Fan If you claim they are now retired, then why are they still being flown, and the crashes are still happening, even in 2018 this year?
    1
  18877.  @nigelliam153  What 200 heavily armed fishing boats are you talking about? Do the fishing boats have weapons themselves or how do you describe their armament? In fact, the Philippine coastguard (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) shot to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shi Cheng ((洪石成), whereas which Philiippine fisherman been shot by Chinese coastguard? Answer: None
    1
  18878.  @akashkrishnat481  "神州 Shenzhou first paragraph I don't agree second paragraph i totally agree," Alright, which part of my first paragraph do you not agree with? China is evidently building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, in other developing countries, we can see clear evidence of this in other countries. For example, we recently unveiled the China-Laos High-Speed Railway connecting China and Laos through HSR.
    1
  18879.  @akashkrishnat481  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago back when the Mongols invaded the Kingdom of Tibet and also Song Dynasty China, and incorporated those territories into Yuan Dynasty China. Later, the Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet during Qing Dynasty China. Tibet only broke free in 1912, but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951, so Tibet is clearly part of Chinese history (as well as today, a part of China). You said: "You are speaking like if China didn't imvade and Colonise Tibet it would have stayed that way (you can't say that cuz that possibility doesn't exist as you have already invaded Tibet)" Compare Tibet Autonomous Region with its neighbors like Bhutan and Nepal, and the TAR is arguably the most advanced in the Himalayan Region. Located at the "Roof of the World", Tibet is quite isolated from the rest of the world, the mountainous terrain is treacherous, the low oxygen environments and so on form a barrier to isolate Tibet from the rest of the world.
    1
  18880.  @akashkrishnat481  But if we go back to my two paragraphs (that you agreed and disagreed with), my first paragraph was specifically about "China being at peace and not at war with any country." Since apparently you can't name any country that China is currently at war with, then I take it you agree with my paragraph that China is at peace and not at war
    1
  18881.  @akashkrishnat481  The McMahon Line was just arbitrarily drawn by the British on a map, ignoring the preexisting established borders and through direct consultation with Tibet and bypassing Beijing. According to the Convention Between Great Britain and Russia (1907): The Governments of Great Britain and Russia recognize the China's suzerainty over Tibet and agreed not to negotiate with Tibet except through a Chinese intermediary. The actual line is: Article II. In conformity with the admitted principle of the suzerainty of China over Thibet, Great Britain and Russia engage not to enter into negotiations with Thibet except through the intermediary of the Chinese Government. ... Source: Convention Between Great Britain and Russia (1907) By the McMahon Line was drawn through direct consultation with Tibet while bypassing the Chinese intermediary, in violation of this convention.
    1
  18882.  @akashkrishnat481  Mongolia today is always welcome to "reclaim China" if they think they can take on the People's Liberation Army (world's largest land army) and still win. I mean, even India can claim many territories like Goa, Manipur, Sikkim, Nagaland, etc, as part of their territory today, then can't China claim Tibet as part of our territory? Like I have shown, Tibet was historically part of China, just look up Maps of Yuan Dynasty, Qing Dynasty, then can't China reclaim our historical territory of Tibet? I mean, the whole world today recognize Tibet as part of China. All the UN nations like USA, UK, Australia, Canada, etc all recognize Tibet as part of China, since no one brings up the issue of Tibetan sovereignty during the UN meetings.
    1
  18883.  @akashkrishnat481  Mongolia today is always welcome to "reclaim China" if they think they can take on the People's Liberation Army (world's largest land army) and still win. I mean, even India can claim many territories like Goa, Manipur, Sikkim, Nagaland, etc, as part of their territory today, then can't China claim Tibet as part of our territory? Like I have shown, Tibet was historically part of China, just look up Maps of Yuan Dynasty, Qing Dynasty, then can't China reclaim our historical territory of Tibet?
    1
  18884.  @akashkrishnat481  Mongolia can try to own the whole of China again, if they think they can take on the People's Liberation Army and still emerge victorious. But Tibet was historically part of China since the Yuan Dynasty, then if they broke free of China, why can't China retake our historical land of Tibet? You said Tibet was independent but which country actually recognize Tibetan independence at that time?
    1
  18885.  @akashkrishnat481  Since there hasn't been any declaration of war between USA and China (nor China with any other country) then that means you agree that China is at peace and not a war with any country? Then why do you disagree with the first of the two paragraphs in my earlier comment? Also, it is interesting to note the Russia and USA aren't technically at war (there hasn't been any declaration of war) yet the U.S is slapping sanctions on Russia all the same.
    1
  18886.  @akashkrishnat481  About the lack of trying, a Chinese Diplomat (Dai Bingguo) has stated that China is willing to make concessions in Aksai Chin if India agrees to cede Tawang (which is an inalienable part of China's Tibet in terms of cultural background and administrative jurisdiction.) The Chinese diplomat has had over 15 talks with India in an attempt to settle our border dispute, but India hasn't accepted (nor has India made any counter proposal of their own).
    1
  18887.  @akashkrishnat481  You said: "And Quad isn't NATO and isn't an absolute US led organisation like NATO(look at how india isn't supporting US in the sanctions against Russia or any other US led invasion)." So tell me: Who is the target that the QUAD was formed against? NATO was formed in response to Soviet's rising military might, but after the 1991 USSR dissolution, NATO no longer serves any interests, except for the U.S's hegemonic interests. You said: "Quad is trying to provide an alternative so that the world is more stable, resilient in times of crisis." The QUAD is a security union, not an economic union, (much like how NATO is a military union, while the EU is an economic union) so how is the QUAD going to provide an alternative to China's position as an economic juggernaut and currently the world's factory? The QUAD has shares more military similarities with NATO then it does economic similarities with the EU.
    1
  18888.  @davethebrahman9870  The Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According an article by Gregory Clark, all verified eyewitness inside Tiananmen Square June 1989 said that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. ... Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies (By Gregory Clark)
    1
  18889.  @davethebrahman9870  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    1
  18890.  @akashkrishnat481  It literally says that the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, colloquially the Quad, is a strategic security dialogue between Australia, India, Japan, and the United States that is maintained by talks between member countries according to Wikipedia. Thus, the Quad shares more in common with a security alliance like NATO, as compared to an economic union like the EU. Also, you still haven't specified who is the target that the Quad is formed against, although I'm pretty sure we know the answer.
    1
  18891.  @akashkrishnat481  You said: "And dude i wrote many important points why are are u not talking about those and just about this" You yourself brought up the Quad, then why can't I talk about it? You choose to copy paste your wall of text (which has nothing to do with my response) and yet seemingly chastise me for talking about the Quad? You didn't even talk about my other points like the illegality of the Mcmahon line, yet you want me to talk about your other points?
    1
  18892.  @davethebrahman9870  Wikileaks has shown that there was No Bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square June 1989, so what slaughter are you talking about?
    1
  18893.  @akashkrishnat481  "(btw nato is North Atlantic Treaty Organisation and Russia's was The Warsaw Pact, name doesn't mean anything in that case)" Warsaw refers to the capital of Poland, where the pact was signed. Also, the Warsaw Pact was founded in 1955 after the formation of NATO in 1949, so it was in response to NATO. You said: "Let me be clear, among these 4 nations noone is Afraid of the Chinese" Then why'd the 4 nations formed a security dialogue against China if they aren't afraid? And it's apparent that the Quad is a security/military based, not economic based. You said: "Quad is about making sure we don't have a situation in which over dependene on China will create a crisis for the international system on Rules based order and trade" Again how? The Quad is a security forum, not an economic forum, and its members literally have China as their largest (or 2nd largest) economic partner, then how can the Quad achieve independence from China's economy? If China economy goes, the Quad economies will collapse as well.
    1
  18894.  @davethebrahman9870  Secret cables from the United States embassy in Beijing have shown there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square when China put down demonstrations 33 years ago. Eyewitnesses include a Chilean Diplomat (Carlos Gallo) and his wife, who did not observe any mass firing into the crowds in Tiananmen Square, and that most of the troops who entered the Square were armed with anti-riot gear like truncheons and wooden clubs.
    1
  18895.  @davethebrahman9870  Secret cables from the United States embassy in Beijing have shown there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square when China put down demonstrations 33 years ago. A Chilean Diplomat (Carlos Gallo) and his wife, who did not observe any mass firing into the crowds, and that most of the troops who entered the Square were armed with anti-riot gear like truncheons and wooden clubs.
    1
  18896.  @davethebrahman9870  A Chilean Diplomat (Carlos Gallo) and his wife, who did not observe any mass firing into the crowds, and that most of the troops who entered the Square were armed with anti-riot gear like truncheons and wooden clubs.
    1
  18897.  @davethebrahman9870  It's probably nauseating for you to realise that you've been lied too all this time, about a supposed "massacre" in Tiananmen Square June 1989, when Wikileaks cables from a Chilean diplomat and his wife reveal that there was no bloodshed inside the Square.
    1
  18898.  @garychin5321  Looks like the English equivalent is rather wordy and doesn't really compare to an analogy unlike the Chinese proverb where the body is the deed and the shadow are the comments. Also, funny how you personally don't like to be perceived as Chinamen type that pander (not panda like you wrote) yet your idol is Bruce Lee.
    1
  18899. Chinese workers manufacture cheap goods like smartphones, computers, appliances, electronics, clothing, toys, sneakers, etc to lower inflation and keep the cost of living in America lower than it should be. Think of the millions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on finer things like cars, houses, getting married, college tuition, etc.
    1
  18900. Then why do Americans flock to Walmart for their products at affordable prices then? Because they don't want to spend more money and get quality.
    1
  18901. China is the world's largest automotive industry by number of cars so what makes you think Chinese don't make cars of our own?
    1
  18902. China is the largest automobile producer in the world accounting for over 25% of the world's automotive industry, meaning that the demand for Chinese cars is still greatest.
    1
  18903.  @stormevans6897  This is the first time I'm hearing of this. Could you point to me this statement allegedly made by the CPC that "all Chinese nationals should return to China, or commit suicide,"? Why on Earth would the CPC want Chinese nationals abroad to commit suicide? It serves absolutely no purpose! If you allege that it's for "espionage and intellectual property theft" then logically speaking, won't it be better if these overseas Chinese remain alive rather than dead? You said: "I would love to visit China if I wouldn't immediately be considered an enemy of the state for what I have on my hard drive or the way I might use my voice." What exactly do you have on your hard drive? If it's some illegal explicit videos of the underage kind, then of course you will be breaking Chinese laws (and many other country's laws as well) if you bring that into China.
    1
  18904.  @stormevans6897  Many Westerners initially had a negative image of China, but some have mustered up the courage to visit China previously, and many of them found that China was nothing like what their country's MSM have been telling them all along. Even on YouTube, you can search up videos along the lines of "China First Impressions" to find out what foreigners' first impressions of China is like.
    1
  18905.  @zilun  Obviously Singapore has a smaller population than China, (as well as smaller land area) so of course Singapore can afford to utilise tracing. Whereas China has world's largest population and more territory to cover for tracing, so China's approach is lockdown (which worked).
    1
  18906. +Total War Fan ???
    1
  18907. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18908. According to it's constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18909. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms while Chinese President Xi is entering his 3rd term.
    1
  18910. Chinese President Xi is entering his 3rd term while German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms
    1
  18911. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to it's constitution.
    1
  18912. If you read their constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18913. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18914. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。轮子只靠黑中国吃饭。
    1
  18915. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18916. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18917. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  18918. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。轮子不许说中国的坏话。轮子只靠黑中国吃饭。
    1
  18919.  @MarkYeung1  I thought we were talking about the 2 companies merging, but it looks as though you cannot respond to the US Congress having a reason to ban Tik Tok if it merged with Douyin, so instead you start bringing in other topics?
    1
  18920.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou We have different opinions. If China allows free internet access, then the Merging is possible and good." Again, the fundamental issue is that the US Congress would not allow Tik Tok if it merged with Douyin, because it means that the app would be under the Chinese government's control, so it would serve as a reason for the US to ban this app. So how is the merging of the 2 companies good?
    1
  18921.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "she doesn't have her phone with her. Isn't it simple enough?" Use email then. What is the communication issue?
    1
  18922. They've been saying that about China since 3 decades ago. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  18923. 1990. China's economy has come to a halt. The Economist. 1996. China's economy will face a hard landing. The Economist. 1998. China's economy’s dangerous period of sluggish growth. The Economist. 1999. Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. Bank of Canada. 2000. China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. Chicago Tribune. 2001. A hard landing in China. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas. 2002. China Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. Westchester University. 2003. Banking crisis imperils China. New York Times. 2004. The great fall of China? The Economist. 2005. The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. Nouriel Roubini. 2006. Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? International Economy. 2007. Can China avoid a hard landing? TIME. 2008. Hard Landing In China? Forbes. 2009. China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. Fortune. 2010: Hard landing coming in China. Nouriel Roubini. 2011: Chinese Hard Landing Closer Than You Think. Business Insider. 2012: Economic News from China: Hard Landing. American Interest. 2013: A Hard Landing In China. Zero Hedge. 2014. A hard landing in China. CNBC. 2015. Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. Forbes. 2016. Hard landing looms for China. The Economist. 2017. Is China's Economy Going To Crash? National Interest. 2018. China's Coming Financial Meltdown. The Daily Reckoning. 2019. Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019. Zero Hedge. 2020. Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. Forbes. 2021. Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. Bloomberg. 2022. China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n. Bloomberg. 2023. No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. Bloomberg. 2024. China's Economy Slump Is Here to Stay. The Economist. ... (Thanks to Cyrus for providing the headline for 2024.)
    1
  18924.  @df9440  我们说的是广州还是河南哦？隧道在河南，跟广州有什么关系？
    1
  18925. Tiangong-1 was launched in 2011, with only expected operational lifespan of 2 years. Its already 2018 and the spacestation has long been decommissioned and reentry to Earth is the natural conclusion at the end of its service. Just like when American spacestation Skylab made news headlines when during its reentry in 1979.
    1
  18926.  @juanreese6933  China has no real desire to expand further. As long as the United States respects mainland China's sovereignty over Taiwan Island and the South China Sea islands, then it's possible to come to some form of agreement. China has no real desire to rule the rest of the world (unlike the U.S)
    1
  18927.  @PlayShorts3  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18928. One possible explanation for the U.S-China trade deficit is the difference between Chinese and American culture of spending. Chinese culture encourages families to be frugal and to save up money for a rainy day, whereas America has a culture of consumerism and buying things that they do not necessarily need, that's one reason why there is a U.S-China trade deficit.
    1
  18929. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18930. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18931.  @yoloswaggins7121  The explanation is simple. Peng Shuai's previous affair with a much older man has been revealed, that's why she's trying to keep a low profile and has been avoiding the public eye all this while. Peng Shuai attended small gatherings and she has appeared in IOC video call, expressing her desire for personal privacy, but the WTA are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private affairs for all the world to see, instead of respecting her wishes.
    1
  18932.  @锦衣夜行-y4v  傻逼就是傻逼。
    1
  18933. Talk about state-sponsored propaganda, Twitter is clearly one, and you can find so many examples in Western social media too.
    1
  18934.  @christianrodm  Homeschooling? You think these Uighurs can even afford private tuition for themselves? And China can't afford to send teachers all over to those remote Uighur villages to home school every one them. Homeschooling them might even increase their terrorist tendencies since they hardly get to interact with rest of society. So the government build these facilities to gather Uighurs from all those remote communities, providing a place for them to meet other Uighurs from other villages and also provide free proper education and job skills training to improve their employability in the work force. And that woman said most trainees learned the skill within 2 months, the longest person took 3-4 months so it doesn't mean that majority took so long to learn it. Dancing, singing, playing musical instruments are for recreational purposes for the Uighurs to relax. What? You thought it was for employment? Even the painting and basket activities are forms of relaxation for these people, isn't it?
    1
  18935.  @christianrodm  Don't you know how big Xinjiang region is? Xinjiang is China's largest province with an area about 1.66 million square kilometers. The remote villages can be located far apart from each other, so what's wrong with providing a gathering place for these Uighurs to meet and learn together, doing enjoyable activities like painting, singing and dancing, or sports in their free time? And the Uighur parents aren't "homeschooling" they're just making the kids read Koran all day, until they literally memorized its verses and then they help their parents tend to their kebab stalls when they're old enough. How is this proper homeschooling you tell me? These Uighur kids could be afforded some of the world's best education in Chinese schools, but are denied because of their parent's backward thinking. Those Uighurs are being trained in hospitality (so that they can potentially find employment in tourism industry) and every individual have their own learning pace. I mean, can you actually make the bed to hotel standard without training?
    1
  18936.  @xiaotuli4614  这不是学你铺你自己的床哦，要学到能铺酒店床的质量。
    1
  18937.  @xiaotuli4614  你有上过大陆的中学吗？跟视频维吾尔族的生活有什么分别？ Video: Chinese High School for a Day youtube.com/watch?v=H6RlWqL2W8Y
    1
  18938.  @xiaotuli4614  You don't support American government? Neither do you support Chinese government? Then who do you think you are? You oppose China's methods, then why don't you explain how to solve the problem you tell me? I have shown actual footage of those Uighur rioting in Urumiqi, Xinjiang, China, and since then, there have been no more major riots of that scale in Xinjiang ever since this program started. So isn't it clear that this method works? Otherwise, what is your proposed solution to this problem, if you disagree with China's methods?
    1
  18939.  @thenutbrothers8726  "神州 Shenzhou sadness,desperation and search for the help ,that is why the eyes left to tell this all." They are smiling, dancing, singing, playing musical instruments. They also enjoy recreational activities like painting and sports like basketball. They don't shy away from the camera, so wheres is this sadness and desperation of which you are speaking of? Look, they can even visit their families at least once a week.
    1
  18940.  @chadwarden5472  "神州 Shenzhou what are your thoughts on 1989 Tiananmen Square protests?" They were Chinese university undergraduates, and they haven't even stepped out into the real world of working adults, yet they already think they know how the best way to govern China? Over Deng Xiaoping? Deng Xiaoping was the man who introduced capitalist reforms to China in 1970s, so imagine what would have happened if these anti-Deng protestors had succeeded in toppling China. China would have been fragmented and divided into various provinces, just like when the Soviet Union collapsed in 1990s and fragmented into Russia, Ukraine, Lithuania, etc, and similarly China would be fragmented into Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc, instead of remaining the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  18941.  @xiaotuli4614  You are not here to give solution, you're just here to complain about China and label me a liar that's all. I have shown that the Uighurs appear to be smiling happily, but you insist that I am lying then wheres your proof? You have zero evidence to support your claim, and you don't even offer a solution despite complain about China's methods. Who do you think you are? You are just a foreigner complaining that's all, you even complain about some Chinese douchebag coming to your country so what's your problem?
    1
  18942.  @xiaotuli4614  You are just a foreigner complaining about China, complaining about some Chinese douchebag in your country, then what? Your country, your rules. Our country, our rules. If you don't like what China is doing, why don't you suggest a better alternative? The one who lose face here is you, because I've behaved respectfully, but all you done is act childish, and contribute nothing to the discussion.
    1
  18943. Even the United States acknowledges the One-China policy that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  18944.  @michaelxu8987  这些轮子靠黑中国吃饭。
    1
  18945.  @michaelxu8987  轮子只靠黑中国吃饭。
    1
  18946.  @michaelxu8987  轮子只靠说中国的坏话吃饭。
    1
  18947.  @michaelxu8987  轮子只懂说中国的坏话。
    1
  18948.  @michaelxu8987  轮子只懂血口喷人。
    1
  18949. Exactly. Even the Biden Administration blames Trump for the botched Afghanistan withdrawal
    1
  18950.  @milesbennettdyson6667  A long-term study by Harvard University and Ash Center has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. So does this mean that you are basically against the Chinese citizens as well as the government?
    1
  18951. To much of the world, China is the 1st biggest trade partner (RED) and 2nd biggest trade partner (ORANGE) according to (businessinsider.com/map-how-china-dominates-global-trade-2013-12/?IR=T ) so it is unlikely that the rest of the world wants to fight with China, lest their economies become affected.
    1
  18952.  @AnimeLover-xp8rl  Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that the cost of living in America is kept lower than it should be. Think about the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent elsewhere like on cars, houses, luxury brands, rent, school fees, tuition fees, etc. Isn't that why many Americans often flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money?
    1
  18953.  @AnimeLover-xp8rl  Check your smartphone and computer, they have parts that are literally Made-in-China.
    1
  18954.  @andrenogueira5058  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a myth propagated by the British. According to an article by Gregory Clark, all verified eyewitnesses say that nothing happened inside Tiananmen Square June 1989, other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. - Gregory Clark
    1
  18955.  @andrenogueira5058  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a myth propagated by the British. According to an article by Gregory Clark, all verified eyewitnesses say that nothing happened inside Tiananmen Square June 1989, other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    1
  18956.  @YakuzaSRC  There are published reports that debunk the allegations of China's so-called "debt trap" diplomacy. In the Atlantic article entitled The Chinese ‘Debt Trap’ Is a Myth Research by Deborah Brautigam and Meg Rithmire shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country.
    1
  18957.  @YakuzaSRC  There are published reports that debunk the allegations of China's so-called "debt trap" diplomacy. Research by Deborah Brautigam and Meg Rithmire shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country. Source: The Chinese ‘Debt Trap’ Is a Myth_
    1
  18958.  @YakuzaSRC  There are published reports that debunk the allegations of China's so-called "debt trap" diplomacy. Research by Deborah Brautigam and Meg Rithmire shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country.
    1
  18959.  @YakuzaSRC  Falun Dafa was founded in 1992 by a man called Li Hongzhi, by hijacking existing practices from Buddhism, Taoism and traditional Chinese Qigong practices. This should already sound off alarm bells that it's actually a cult in disguise. Followers believe that their leader Li purportedly possesses supernatural powers and Li claims to know "the top secret of the universe" and says "no religion can save people" but the "almighty Fa," which he exclusively represents. He is therefore essentially the chosen savior of man. The biography in his book "Zhuan Falun" claims that he first recognized his special powers at the age of 8. Falun Dafa followers believe that Li Hongzhi is always right and they are not allowed to question the basic assumptions concerning his purported supernatural powers, teachings or opinions. There were cases of followers when were early stage cancer patients, but they refused to seek medical treatment, instead they encouraged to donate their savings to Li in hopes of him curing their cancer. In the end, the cancer patients died. And what about Tiananmen Square? It's one of China's largest parade squares where parades are held during China's National Day. We recently celebrated the 100th Anniversary of the founding of Communist Party of China last year in Tiananmen Square.
    1
  18960.  @zackk4393  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"? Video: Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' youtu.be/DPt-zXn05ac
    1
  18961.  @taffyandbeanz  Who is @gooldog and what did he/she say?
    1
  18962.  @johnnyrommel4113  I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion:Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  18963.  @刘老汉-v7t  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18964. Even if Germany manages to send those 50 tanks to Ukraine, does Ukraine have the necessary logistics to field them? Those tanks look like they can burn through their rounds rather quickly, and Germany will have to send more ammo to Ukraine (which could become the target by Russian missile)
    1
  18965. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18966. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18967. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18968. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18969. 觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  18970. 觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  18971.  The Orange Stool Sample  The special military operation is by Russia, why are you lumping China in with it? China is actually sending humanitarian aid to Ukraine, whereas NATO is sending lethal aid to Ukraine in order the prolong the conflict that the Ukrainians are losing.
    1
  18972.  @slee4039  "神州 Shenzhou you got to be kidding when you propose that China should not retaliate if IS sanctions China???" Because China's retaliation would lead to escalation, possibly leading to outright military conflict, and potential nuclear war and a mutually assured destruction scenario. It's no secret that the U.S is in decline and China is rising. China should do everything in its power to avoid getting sucked into an unnecessary war, which would devastate our economy. As long as peace prevails, the U.S will decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise any longer. Time is on China's side, and I believe this is the best course of action for China. A sanctions war could potentially escalate into an outright war.
    1
  18973.  @AC-he8ln  A reuters article dated April 6, 2009 said: Khmer Rouge jailer says U.S. contributed to Pol Pot rise
    1
  18974.  @AC-he8ln  China did so with the U.S blessing. When Vietnam intervened in Cambodia and drove the Pol Potists from power in January 1972, Washington took immediate steps to preserve the Khmer Rouge as a guerrilla movement. International relief agencies were pressured by the U.S. to provide humanitarian assistance to the Khmer Rouge guerrillas who fled into Thailand. During his reign as National Security Adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski played an important role in determining how the U.S. would support the Pol Pot guerrillas. Brzezinski himself claims that he concocted the idea of persuading Thailand to cooperate fully with China in efforts to rebuild the Khmer Rouge.... Brzezinski said, " I encouraged the Chinese to support Pol Pot. I encouraged the Thai to help the DK [Democratic Kampuchea]. The question was how to help the Cambodian people. Pol Pot was an abomination. We could not support him but China could." ... Source:thirdworldtraveler.com/US_ThirdWorld/US_PolPot.html
    1
  18975.  @initialdwu7821  The premise of Squid Game is literally capitalism at work. A shadowy organisation targets desperate people facing financial difficulties and lures them to participate in deadly competition among themselves for an attractive prize in the end, presumably for the entertainment of the rich and wealthy.
    1
  18976.  @magnetospin  But mansana didn't really ask any question, since there is no question mark in his post.
    1
  18977.  @magnetospin  "神州 Shenzhou he/she was asking people to raise their hand." Where in his/her post did mansana ever asked such a question? There is no question mark in the OP's statement, so what question are you talking about?
    1
  18978.  @magnetospin  "神州 Shenzhou mansana's statement shows that he/she is an authoritarian because that's the kind of things only authoritarians do, ie, constantly asking people to agree with him/her." But you've repeatedly failed to show how did mansana ask a question, given that there is no question mark in his/her opening post. Could you point out where the question mark is in his/her statement?
    1
  18979.  @magnetospin  "Perhaps you are not familiar with this and doesn't think it's authoritarian behavior. In that case, you also have authoritarian tendencies." Now you're claiming that I have authoritarian tendencies? All I did was ask you what has mansana's statement even got to do with whether or not China is an authoritarian state? Is mansana a member of the CPC or something? And you've been disagreeing with his/her statement yet nothing happened to you so how does that reaffirm the belief about China?
    1
  18980.  @magnetospin  You said: "Or I can voice my opinion after seeing the same comment on every video of every China vlogger I visit for the past several years." Since you can voice your comment, then how does mansana's post reaffirm people's beliefs that China is an authoritarian state? What has one person's comment on YouTube indicate that China is authoritarian?
    1
  18981.  @magnetospin  "神州 Shenzhou I already explained my previous comment." You did not, you've repeatedly failed to point out any question mark in mansana's comment. Also, how does one person's comment on YouTube reaffirm people's beliefs that China is an authoritarian state? Where's the link?
    1
  18982.  @magnetospin  You said: "the act of asking people who agree with them to raise their hands is something only authoritarians would do," But how does that translate into reaffirming people's beliefs that China is an authoritarian state? What has mansana's comment even got to do with China?
    1
  18983.  @INTJ791  "神州 Shenzhou okay, shenzhou, who mostly comment reply deleted," Whose comment has been deleted? If you're accusing me again, what makes you think I have the power to censor your comments?
    1
  18984.  @magnetospin  But is mansana a member of the Chinese government? Then how does mansana's post reaffirm people's beliefs that China is an authoritarian state? This is the crux of the argument, in which you're unable to address.
    1
  18985.  @magnetospin  "You seem to have difficulty understanding English" Now you're resorting to mocking my English proficiency? You can't even point out where the question mark is in mansana's post, yet you bring up my English proficiency?
    1
  18986.  @magnetospin  "神州 Shenzhou I am not mocking your English. I am just stating a fact." You are clearly mocking my English proficiency. Also, I stated a fact that there is no question mark in mansana's comment, so what question are you referring to?
    1
  18987.  @INTJ791  "神州 Shenzhou answer is he or she traitor or not for "only" embracing 70 percent mainland values and more fluent speak English than mandarin," Who are you to demand answers out of me now?
    1
  18988.  @magnetospin  If we follow your definition of an authoritarian state, then isn't the United States going around and telling other countries to publicly condemn Russia, a form of authoritarianism in and of itself?
    1
  18989.  @magnetospin  You said: "And by the way, it's not a question, it's request." Now you're calling it a request instead of a question? Then how does mansana's request translate into reaffirming people's belief that China is an authoritarian state?
    1
  18990.  @INTJ791  You said: "Uneccesary Censorship act like this will make Chinese Singaporean more afraid to fully side with mainland," According to Human Rights Watch, Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Their citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. The Singapore government has also aggressively enforced a sweeping “online falsehoods” law that permits government ministers to order the “correction” or removal of online content. Doesn't Singapore's censorship sound remarkably similar to mainland China's? What's there to be afraid of?
    1
  18991.  @INTJ791  Singapore and China's political systems actually share much in common. For example, Singapore has been governed by the authoritarian, single-party People's Action Party for 57 years (basically its entire life as a nation), similar to how China has been ruled by the CPC for 73 years.
    1
  18992.  @mmm6214  Those Chinese Thai, Chinese Malaysia, and Chinese Singapore left back when mainland China was still a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the 1930s. The Chinese who remained in China during that trying time, were the ones who gradually lifted millions of people out of poverty in China over the decades.
    1
  18993.  @mmm6214  In the 1930s, China was still a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country at that time, and those Chinese that left China during this turbulent period never looked back. It took the combined efforts of both the government as well as the vast majority of Chinese that remained, to gradually lift millions of people out of poverty in China over the decades, and those Thai Chinese, Malaysian Chinese, Singaporean Chinese, did not experience the same hardships that mainland Chinese faced. So our experiences are definitely different to say the least.
    1
  18994.  @INTJ791  In 2019, the Singapore government passed laws (i.e POFMA) that granted the government sweeping powers to issue orders demanding corrections, content removal, access blocks, and more, without checks and balances that inspire confidence. POFMA allows any government minister to issue orders to correct, take down, or disable access to content, and compliance is mandated up front within a time frame set by the authorities, even if the recipient of the order later decides to appeal the order to the courts. Doesn't Singapore's political censorship sound remarkably similar to China's?
    1
  18995.  @INTJ791  In Singapore, protesting without permit is illegal. In 2009, Singapore government passed the Public Order Act, requiring a police permit for any “cause-related” assembly. Even a single person standing alone holding a sign has been treated as an “assembly” requiring a permit. In March 2021, a Singapore member of parliament showed his support for food hawkers, holding up a sign saying "support them" and as a result, is being investigated by the police.
    1
  18996.  @INTJ791  So it appears that you have no qualms when your Singapore government censors the content that you watch. Yet you harbor strong opposition when it comes to censorship in mainland China? Why the seemingly double standards when it comes to censorship? (As for adult videos, if you watch full-length Japanese AV movies, they usually begin with Mandarin Chinese advertisements on gambling and live chat, which makes you wonder who is the primary market audience for the AV)
    1
  18997.  @mmm6214  Who's getting cocky? All I did was point out the similarities between Singapore and being under authoritarian single-party PAP rule for 57 years much like how China is under CPC rule for 73 years. Also, Deng Xiaoping's policies were different from Singapore's, in fact, it's Singapore that copied the system of meritocracy (which originated in ancient China).
    1
  18998.  vlADOLF PUTLER  Do Canadians even remember the occupations of the two Michaels? Whereas everyone knows that Meng Wanzhou is the Huawei CFO.
    1
  18999.  vlADOLF PUTLER  Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of the Great Chinese Famine, which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because his objective is to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    1
  19000.  vlADOLF PUTLER  So did you found out the line of work that the 2 Michaels do? Whereas Meng Wanzhou needs no introduction to what job she does.
    1
  19001.  @ChiefCabioch  "神州 Shenzhou silliest as in the most obvious" Well then, is there something wrong with me choosing to answer the (in your opinion) most obvious question? I really don't understand why you feel the need to bring up the 2nd Amendment when many in America are mourning and protesting over the tragic shooting in Uvalde.
    1
  19002.  @ChiefCabioch  "神州 Shenzhou China keeps saying that we should give up our guns" Did China ever said that? You said: "...something poor Chinese didn't have when Chairman Mao Zedong had 45-60 million murdered, look at the facts, Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of the Great Chinese Famine, which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because his objective is to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. I mean, China's population in 1950s-1960s at that time was around 600 million, yet you're claiming Mao murdered 60 million? That means China lost around 10% of our population during that time then why is China currently the country with the world's largest population if we lost 10% of our population?
    1
  19003.  @ChiefCabioch  "神州 Shenzhou I'm not the one wishing China I'll will, it's they who keep threatening us," In your post, you literally have no qualms about reducing China to rubble and smoldering ashes. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it seems like the U.S is a threat to global peace and stability.
    1
  19004.  @ChiefCabioch  "神州 Shenzhou I'm not the one wishing China I'll will, it's they who keep threatening us," You literally have no qualms about reducing China to rubble and smoldering ashes, literally wiping off a fifth of humanity off the face of the planet, how's that not ill-will? And how did China threaten the U.S? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc.
    1
  19005.  @ChiefCabioch  Under Chairman Mao, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Under Mao, China's life expectancy at birth nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al.) I mean, if you claim Mao murdered 60 million, that's around 10% of our population at that time. Yet why is it that China is currently the country with the world's largest population at 1.4 billion people?
    1
  19006.  @ChiefCabioch  "神州 Shenzhou China has lost thousands of foreign businesses, doing business, over Hong Kong and Covid policies," China actually overtook the United States as the world's largest recipient of foreign direct investment (FDI) in 2020, having brought in $163 billion in inflows, compared to the $134 billion attracted by the United States, according to a report by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). Source: Reuters: China was largest recipient of FDI in 2020: Report
    1
  19007.  vlADOLF PUTLER  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China has nearly quadrupled from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    1
  19008.  @ChiefCabioch  Factual advise? I never specified that I use Google to search, then why are you giving me advice on something I never said I used? The fact that you're admitted that you see no problem with reducing China to rubble and smoldering ashes, that means you're basically anti-China, and that you see nothing wrong with wiping out about a fifth of humanity (i.e Chinese) off the face of the planet.
    1
  19009.  @ChiefCabioch  Factual advise? I never specified that I use Google to search, then why are you giving me advice on something I never said I used? The fact that you're admitted that you see no problem with reducing China to rubble and smoldering ashes, that means you're basically anti-China that's all, and you can't stand to see China succeed.
    1
  19010.  @ChiefCabioch  I've been reading your posts for quite a while now, and it's clear as day that you're anti-China. From the beginning of your posts, you've been constantly looking down on China, mocking Chinese people as "lacking freedoms" that you purportedly possess, and claiming Chinese are somehow envious of your so-called right to bear arms. But look at the Americans mourning the Uvalde shootings and why would Chinese be envious of that? It's somehow like you're trying to blame China for your problems back home.
    1
  19011.  @ChiefCabioch  I've been reading your posts for quite a while now, and it's clear as day that you're anti-China. From the beginning of your posts, you've been constantly looking down on China, mocking Chinese people as "lacking freedoms" that you purportedly possess, and claiming Chinese are somehow envious of your so-called right to bear arms. But look at the Americans mourning the Uvalde shootings and why would Chinese be envious of that?
    1
  19012.  @ChiefCabioch  I've been reading your posts for quite a while now, and it's clear as day that you're anti-China. From the beginning of your posts, you've been constantly looking down on China, and claiming Chinese are somehow envious of your so-called right to bear arms. But look at the Americans mourning the Uvalde shootings and why would Chinese be envious of that?
    1
  19013.  @ChiefCabioch  "神州 Shenzhou you keep avoiding the questions with side s**t" You don't even bother to answer my questions, yet you're demanding answers out of me? You just wrote an entire paragraph about how Chinese are "hate-filled" and "ingratitude" and that you have no qualms reducing China into ruble and smoldering ashes? Then if you ask me, the one filled with hate here is you, not me. Like the part about nukes, you keep on accusing China of threatening to nuke Japan, when the U.S is the only country in the world to have launched nuclear strikes against another country (against Japan of all countries) then why the sudden feigned concern that China will do the same? Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  19014.  @ChiefCabioch  China has air-pollution problems yes, so the government built the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to provide clean, renewable energy to reduce our over-reliance on fossil fuels. This makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity. Top Countries by Hydropower Electricity Generation in 2019 1. China (1,229 TWh) 2. Brazil (414 TWh) 3. Canada (382 TWh) 4. United States (294 TWh) 5. Russia (184 TWh) 6. Norway (139 TWh) 7. India (130 TWh) 8. Japan (88 TWh) 9. Venezuela (70 TWh) 10. France (62 TWh) ... Source: Video: Top 20 Country by Hydropower Electricity Generation (1965-2019) Yet you have no qualms about reducing our prosperous country of China to smoldering ashes?
    1
  19015.  @ChiefCabioch  "神州 Shenzhou Vietnam isn't China, if Nike leaves China and keeps Vietnam its left China, your argument is moot...." But the point is that Nike hasn't left China then how does that count on your so-called list of companies that left China?
    1
  19016.  @ChiefCabioch  China actually signed the No-First-Use policy regarding nuclear weapons, meaning that China will not resort to using nukes unless we are ourselves attacked with nukes first. Whereas the U.S hasn't signed such an agreement, so the U.S can preemptively launch nuclear strike against anyone with impunity. Also, there's the history that the U.S is the only country in the world to have launched nuclear strikes against Imperial Japan, yet are you going to flatten every inch of America?
    1
  19017.  @ChiefCabioch  China has 5x the population of the U.S yet you seen nothing wrong with wiping out a fifth of humanity by reducing China to rubble and smoldering ashes, then the one filled with hatred here appears to be you. China not only dominates hydroelectricity, but China also dominates solar power. China is the world leader of solar panel manufacturing and also produces more solar power than any other in the world. Top Solar Energy Producing Country in 2018 1. China (177,500,000 MWh per year) 2. United States (97,118,000 MWh per year) 3. Japan (71,688,000 MWh per year) 4. Germany (46,164,000 MWh per year) 5. India (30,732,000 MWh per year) 6. Italy (23,230,000 MWh per year) 7. United Kingdom (12,921,000 MWh per year) 8. Spain (12,520,000 MWh per year) 9. Australia (12,081,000 MWh per year) 10. France (10,158,000 MWh per year) .. Source: Video: Top Solar Energy Producing Country | Solar Energy Data As for your question, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, even Taiwan's own constitution says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to its constitution (or any formal declaration of independence), then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  19018.  @ChiefCabioch  China not only dominates hydroelectricity, but China also dominates solar power. China is the world leader of solar panel manufacturing and also produces more solar power than any other in the world. Top Solar Energy Producing Country in 2018 1. China (177,500,000 MWh per year) 2. United States (97,118,000 MWh per year) 3. Japan (71,688,000 MWh per year) 4. Germany (46,164,000 MWh per year) 5. India (30,732,000 MWh per year) 6. Italy (23,230,000 MWh per year) 7. United Kingdom (12,921,000 MWh per year) 8. Spain (12,520,000 MWh per year) 9. Australia (12,081,000 MWh per year) 10. France (10,158,000 MWh per year) .. Source: Video: Top Solar Energy Producing Country | Solar Energy Data As for your question, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, even Taiwan's own constitution says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to its constitution (or any formal declaration of independence), then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  19019.  @ChiefCabioch  You claim that Taiwan is autonomous, then why is it that Taiwan cannot join the United Nations as an independent country? Is there something preventing Taiwan from joining the UN like an independent country can? As for renewable energy, not only does China dominate hydroelectric and solar power, but China also dominates wind power as well. Countries by wind energy production in 2018 1. China (336,000 GWh) 2. United States (277,729 GWh) 3. Germany (111,590 GWh) 4. India (60,311 GWh) 5. United Kingdom (57,115 GWh) 6. Spain (50,836 GWh) 7. Brazil (48,479 GWh) 8. Canada (32,170 GWh) 9. France (28,167 GWh) 10. Turkey (19,825 GWh) ... Source: Video: World's Best Wind Power Producers
    1
  19020.  @ChiefCabioch  Even at the Olympics, athletes from Taiwan can only participate under the banner of "Chinese Taipei", then how can you claim Taiwan is independent?
    1
  19021. If you want to see the past 10 years of Chinese history, visit Shanghai. If you want to see the past 100 years of Chinese history, visit Beijing. If you want to see the past 1000 years of Chinese history, visit Xi'an. If you want to see the the future, visit Shenzhen.
    1
  19022. Why is it the video includes India and other US allies, but fails to mention Russia (which supports any country going against USA) ? The uploader should either consider all possible allies, or choose not to consider them at all in this scenario.
    1
  19023. Chinese workers help to modernize Tibet by building roads,railways, streetlamps, running water, gas, electricity, housing, schools, universities, hospitals, powerstations, etc. Tibetans today can enjoy modern amenities like smartphones, computers, WiFi, Internet, etc, and as Chinese ethnic minority, Tibetans enjoy special tax exemption, free education up to university, and healthcare bursaries. Chinese workers even built Qinghai railway station (world's highest elevation railway) so that the mountaineous Tibet is no longer so isolated from rest of the world. So why you think Tibetans are on the edge of rebellion then?
    1
  19024. During Dalai Lama rule of Tibet. Tibet was brutal theocracy, with 95% of population being slaves, and the elite 5% being slave-owners. The mountainous Tibetan soil was infertile, and serfs toil all day in order to produce enough food to feed the population and the 5% elite. Starvation was commonplace, stealing of food is punished by mutilation of limbs, or skinning of the victims. There is this Tibetan drum called damaru that consists of two human skulls, with the drumskin being made from human skin and using human bones for the drumstick. The Dalai Lama was worshiped as divine being and his followers sometimes fought for the right to consume his body fluids, like saliva, urine, or even feces, because he was though to the be a holy vessel for divine essence. After the PLA regained control of Tibet in 1951, Tibet's population was only 1.14 million, but it has since tripled, to about 3 million people. This is because China modernized Tibet, building roads, houses, running water, gas, electricity, and food was imported from the mainland to feed and grow its population.
    1
  19025.  @arcarcon4620  Hong Kongers elect their own government separate from the mainland. Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam was elected into power after winning the three way 2017 Hong Kong election, garnering 777 votes out of the 1,194-member Election Committee (which consist of Hong Kong groups) and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong elections. So how is Hong Kong government a puppet of the Communist Party of China?
    1
  19026.  @demonboy3779  Where's your evidence that Chinese government hired those triads? The government wants to to draw as little attention as possible to Hong Kong (The government says Hong Kong is not up for discussion in summit meetings) so why would the government stir up more trouble in Hong Kong that would draw more attention to it?
    1
  19027.  @demonboy3779  That's just a single pro Beijing person's opinion, how is that evidence that the Communist Party of China is behind the Yuen Long attacks? The CCP doesn't want to draw attention to Hong Kong, so why would they stir up more trouble in Hong Kong you tell me?
    1
  19028. Here's western economist's headline China's economy since 1990. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet the fact is that China's economy grew 5% in 2024. You're telling me you believe those headlines about China's economy?
    1
  19029.  @TurntBucket  Those western headlines have been wrong about China since 1990, yet you still believe them? Also, what makes you think I am in the 50 cent army? Did I mention anything about the Communist Party of China?
    1
  19030.  Dumb & Dumber  China is already the world's factory.
    1
  19031.  @dragonknightleader1  "The problem is China doesn't want co-dependency," China's push for self-sustainability is a direct result of former U.S President Trump's tariffs and the sanctioning U.S chips to China. As a result, Chinese company SMIC recently make a chip technological breakthrough in the fabrication of 7 nm chips for use in semiconductors (possibly by 2 generations). So it was the U.S attempting to decouple from China that pushed China towards developing domestic industries to reduce reliance. "they want to be the big brother and the US as the little brother." The U.S has been the big brother for so long, isn't it time for a change? If China can surpass the United State's someday in the foreseeable future, then can't China strive towards attaining this goal?
    1
  19032.  @dragonknightleader1  What makes you claim China doesn't care about the environment? China built the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam, to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels. The Three Gorges Dam produces clean renewable energy equivalent to burning 100 million tons of CO2 and 2 million tons of sulfur dioxide. It also makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity. Countries by Hydroelectricity production in 2018 1. China (1,229 TWh) 2. Brazil (414 TWh) 3. Canada (382 TWh) 4. United States (294 TWh) 5. Russia (184 TWh) 6. Norway (139 TWh) 7. India (130 TWh) 8. Japan (88 TWh) 9. Venezuela (70 TWh) 10. France (62 TWh) ... Source: YouTube: Top 20 Country by Hydropower Electricity Generation (1965-2019)
    1
  19033.  @dragonknightleader1  You said: "Having the US be reliant on Chinese resources, labor, and in the Film industry's case, capital is NOT a healthy co-dependent relationship." Then why'd you said earlier that "The problem is China doesn't want co-dependency,"? You support the U.S moving towards self-sustainability but when China does it, it's a "problem"?
    1
  19034.  @dragonknightleader1  China ranks top in the world in hydroelectricity production, so what makes you think China doesn't care about the environment? Countries by Hydroelectricity production in 2018 1. China (1,229 TWh) 2. Brazil (414 TWh) 3. Canada (382 TWh) 4. United States (294 TWh) 5. Russia (184 TWh) 6. Norway (139 TWh) 7. India (130 TWh) 8. Japan (88 TWh) 9. Venezuela (70 TWh) 10. France (62 TWh) ... Source: YouTube: Top 20 Country by Hydropower Electricity Generation (1965-2019)
    1
  19035.  @xixipiisacanine5505  Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html
    1
  19036.  @manalittlesis  America has long surpassed their British colonial masters on the global stage, but Singapore is nowhere as influential as China on the global stage. In fact, the British tried to be loyal to the USA, but the shambolic withdrawal of Afghan troops, shows that being loyal to America doesn't pay off in the end.
    1
  19037.  @ericphua2359  Those 3 Pandas are on loan to Singapore from China, so that Singapore Zoo can stage attractions for visitors. And if you think 600 millions living a life worst, Singapore property prices are among some of the highest in the world, some young couples having a hard time finding houses for themselves. Whereas every Chinese have our laojia 老家 hometown to return to.
    1
  19038.  Alexandria School of Science  Singapore made English the national language, so as a result, many Singaporeans been brought up on Western anti-China propaganda. Many in Singapore are still suffering from the mental damage inflicted by colonization on the mindset of the colonized. While the British may physically left Singapore, "decolonization of the mind" takes a longer time to heal in Singapore.
    1
  19039.  @praisethelegendarymessiahs2617  About Ethnic cleansing of Chinese Indonesians and Chinese Malaysians, let me get this straight, those Chinese left China of their own accord, to start a new life in Indonesia and Malaysia, then how exactly is PRC or ROC to blame for genocide of Chinese in those countries? Those Chinese who left are always welcome to come back to China, but why should China save those Chinese who abandoned their homeland in search of better life in ASEAN countries?
    1
  19040.  @erickm8799  China Evergrande is not bankrupt, what are you talking about? Why are you deliberately spreading fake news about China Evergrande being bankrupt? Under Singapore's laws (Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act) you are breaking the law by deliberately spreading false information.
    1
  19041.  @erickm8799  About the One Child Policy, in the past China was still dirt-poor country, suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems at that time. Why allow families in China to raise multiple kids, only for them to starve to death, succumb to childhood diseases, and having not enough food, not enough hospitals, and not enough schools to send them all to? Why not make families focus all available resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood, and get him into a good school? According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Look at India, world's 2nd largest population country, and India is suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems that China once suffered from in the past.
    1
  19042.  @manalittlesis  When Britain was the colonial superpower during the 19th century, many Americans were loyal to Britain when they were strong. Now that America has surpassed Britain as the premier world superpower since the 20th its Britain that's become loyal to America, willingly following America into Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc. So why is it inconceivable to you that a Singaporean Chinese feels loyalty towards his/her homeland, now that China is rising?
    1
  19043.  @erickm8799  Not everyone is as fortunate enough as you, to be born having enough food to eat, safety, having access to healthcare and education, and so on. Previously, China was a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, suffering from overpopulation, high birth rate, high child mortality, malnutrition and illiteracy. Poor families had multiple mouths to feed, what little money was divided until some children starved to death, some succumbed to childhood diseases and parents having not enough money to send their multiple kids to school. Why not pool all available resources for poor families to raise a single child into adulthood and send him into a good school? That was how China was able to lift millions of people out of poverty and into the middle class, as well as raise adult literacy rates. Look at India (world's largest democracy) and they have no population control measures, so the poor families are trapped in cycle of poverty by having many mouths to feed and raise.
    1
  19044.  @praisethelegendarymessiahs2617  So the logic is that your parents fled China of their own accord, then why blame China for not coming to your family's rescue during genocide of Chinese in Indonesia and Malaysia? How is China responsible for genocide that happened in other countries because your parents abandoned China and decided to start a new life elsewhere? How does your logic make sense. For example, if living in a huge family with many kids, if you as older sibling refuse to help your parents raise the family, instead you choose to disown your parents and run away from home of your own accord, to start a new life somewhere else with a spouse and settle down in a new house. Then if your new neighbours decide to start genocide of your new family, why do you expect your parents to come to your rescue? It's the same logic as people who abandoned their homeland and still expect their homeland to come rescue you when you're in trouble?
    1
  19045.  @manalittlesis  You jump into this discussion about Chinese Singaporeans being loyal to the motherland and started talking about Americans being loyal to the British, then how does your comparison even make sense? Chinese culture is obviously different from Western culture, so why are you using Americans and British to compare?
    1
  19046.  @praisethelegendarymessiahs2617  You said: "Just don't play the ethnic card. We are not the same. Its offensive to us!" Look, even your own Singapore identity card (NRIC) lists your race as Chinese if you are Chinese Singaporean, so who's playing what ethnic card? It says some on your Singapore identity card that your race is Chinese, yet you are offended by being of the same ethnicity as me, then what do you want me to do? Go and undergo surgery to change your race to something else if you are offended by being listed as Chinese in your identity card.
    1
  19047.  @erickm8799  I clearly mentioned China was dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, why are you suddenly talking about China today? Weren't you talking about the One Child Policy in past, and being unable to refute it, you jump to China in the modern time?
    1
  19048.  Alexandria School of Science  I never even mentioned anything about America at all. I even mentioned in another post to you that the USA operates aircraft carrier base in Singapore and that Singapore buys U.S F-35 fighter jets, so in fact, Singapore is supporting the U.S military-industrial complex.
    1
  19049.  Alexandria School of Science  You can't refute my points so you just claim I'm an American agent? I never mentioned anything about America here in this thread, so why are you accusing me of being an American agent?
    1
  19050.  @erickm8799  "神州 Shenzhou Don't skip the question." You're the one brought in fake news about China Evergrande being bankrupt, then when I exposed your lie, you just laugh. Then what evidence do you have that China sponsored African student before Deng's economic reforms? You already been caught red-handed lying, yet you still demand that I answer your question? You can't even refute the fact that the One Child Policy made poor families concentrate what little money they have into raising a healthy kid into adulthood and send him to a good school. Look at the poor families in India having many mouths to feed. China would be like India today without the One Child Policy.
    1
  19051.  @praisethelegendarymessiahs2617  So your parents abandoned China of their own accord, then when there's genocide of Chinese in Indonesia and Malaysia, why do you blame China for? If you run away from home to start a new life somewhere else, how can you blame your family for your problems in another place? Please explain your logic.
    1
  19052.  @praisethelegendarymessiahs2617  Go and look at your Singapore Identity Card, even your NRIC says that your Race is Chinese. This is your government's doing, not mine, yet you accuse me of playing the ethnic card? Look at your NRIC and tell me what your race is, if not Chinese. Yet you claim we are not the same?
    1
  19053.  @erickm8799  You said: "Ya, most are rich Chinese businessmen "escape" from China early with their wealth." That's why mainland's China's wealth gradually decreased over time, because the corrupt landlords and businessmen brought their wealth overseas and leaving the mainland a dirt-poor, starving country. You know who are the ones who made China great? The people who remained behind to build our country up from scratch.
    1
  19054.  @erickm8799  "神州 Shenzhou . Don't bulls**t here about being treat "coldly when you speak in English"" Did you even read my post carefully? I never said anything about being treated coldly when I spoke English, I said Singaporeans warmed up to me when I speak English. This was what I wrote earlier: As a mainlander, I open my mouth and spoke Mandarin in Singapore and many Singaporeans could detect the mainland accent so some of them treated me coldly. But when I open my mouth and speak English, many Singaporeans warmed up to me. But when did I ever said anything about being treated coldly when I spoke in English?
    1
  19055.  @erickm8799  You said: "And a mainlander, you are not allowed to surf youtube, don't you know, you can only use Chinese APP." Nobody will come arrest you just for surfing YouTube while in China, which persona has been arrested just for doing so?
    1
  19056.  @erickm8799  You said: "You notice also, his English standard is same as Pooh's level. " You do know that the Winnie The Pooh is a racist caricature directed against Asian people? He's a yellow bear with small eyes for crying out loud, can't you see how you are demeaning Asian people every time you refer to President Xi Jinping by such a caricature?
    1
  19057.  @erickm8799  Apart from China Evergrande, China is home to many of the world's largest banks like China Construction Bank, ICBC, AgBank, Bank of China, Postal Savings Bank of China, Bank of Communications, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank (China), China Minsheng Bank, Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, China China CITIC Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Huaxia Bank, Bank of Beijing, China Guangfa Bank, Bank of Shanghai, Bank of Jiangsu, China Zheshang Bank and so on. Source: Wikipedia: List of largest banks But where are the famous banks from Singapore?
    1
  19058.  @erickm8799  Winnie the Pooh is clearly a racist caricature, because he's a yellow bear and he has sleepy-looking eyes, so why are you demeaning Asian people by comparing President Xi to Winnie the Pooh?
    1
  19059.  Alexandria School of Science  "神州 Shenzhou what points did you actually make? You keep pushing for American Singapore alliance, so I am asking you if you are American agent." When did I ever mentioned anything about American Singapore alliance? Then why are you accusing me of being an American agent?
    1
  19060.  Alexandria School of Science  Who are you to demand answers out of me? I never once said anything about about American Singapore alliance, so why are you accusing me of being an American agent?
    1
  19061.  Alexandria School of Science  Who said that I'm a spy for America? Why are you making up all this assumptions about me?
    1
  19062.  @praisethelegendarymessiahs2617  Those Chinese born in South East Asia choose to identify their race as Chinese for crying out loud. China did not force you to pick Chinese as your race, you made your own choice, so why are you blaming China when you call yourselves Chinese? Your parents choose to leave China of their own accord, yet when they encounter genocide in Malaysia and Indonesia, why come crying to China when your parents abandoned China? ** You said: "So I guess our people died in vain assisting Sino-land in the struggle against imperial Japan." Singapore Chinese died fighting against the Japanese occupation of Singapore, what has China even got to do with that? Your parents abandoned China, then it's your parents choice, you expect China to protect Singapore from the Japanese, is that what you are saying?
    1
  19063.  @Ron8649  Read his earlier words, I quote his words: "Ethnic cleansing of Han Indonesians in 1998 and Han Malaysians on May13 1969 in Kuala Lumpur and many many other ethnic cleansing in other parts of the world. The ROC and PRC did absolutely nothing to help." But overseas Chinese choose to leave China of their own accord, then why blame China for genocide in Malaysia and Indonesia? Also, he said: "神州 Shenzhou My parents fled those regimes to settle in SG. So you finally admit you don't care. Welcome the back to China?? Don't talk rubbish. Okay we go our separate ways. Just don't play the ethnic card. We are not the same. Its offensive to us!" But China did not tell Singapore to input your race as Chinese, your government did so by themselves, so why blame Chinese and claim we are not the same? Yet you're calling me a "special kind of thick"?
    1
  19064.  @Ron8649  "神州 Shenzhou Yeah you are special kind of thick. When somebody helps you then you return the favour." Why resort to hurling personal insults against me (calling me a special kind of thick) just because my views happen to differ from you? Are you saying that mainland China owes Singapore a living? For what? Your ancestors choose to abandon their homeland and come to Singapore, then how does China owe Singapore a living? Analogy: If you run away from home and abandon your parents, then would you knock on their door one day and tell them "Father, Mother, you owe me a living"?
    1
  19065.  @Ron8649  "神州 Shenzhou As for the ID cards. If their govs choose to classify them by their ethnicity, thats not their fault either." So you're saying that @Praise The Legendary Messiah Statesman Harry Lee hates his own race? Has he looked at himself in a mirror and figured out what race he is? Then why hate his own skin you tell me? Since you've been resorting to personal insults against me for my views?
    1
  19066.  @Ron8649  "神州 Shenzhou "But overseas Chinese choose to leave China of their own accord, then why blame China for genocide in Malaysia and Indonesia? We also choose to send assistance back to the motherland in those days." Look, he's blaming China for the genocide in Malaysia and Indonesia, what has that even got to do with you choosing to send assistance back to the motherland in those days? How does your statement even answer the question you quoted?
    1
  19067.  @ericphua2359  "神州 Shenzhou . Many Banks in China you mention own the debt in Evergranda, Wangda, fantasia ans etc." How did you even manage to obtain this information that nobody else have? You predict that suddenly all over China's major banks become bankrupt and collapse, plunging China into debt? Wow, what have you been smoking to arrive at such a conclusion? Just like earlier you claimed Evergrande was bankrupt, turns out you're spreading fake news that's all. And where are all the famous banks in Singapore to compare with China Construction Bank, ICBC, AgBank, Bank of China, Postal Savings Bank of China, Bank of Communications, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank (China), China Minsheng Bank, Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, China China CITIC Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Huaxia Bank, Bank of Beijing, China Guangfa Bank, Bank of Shanghai, Bank of Jiangsu, China Zheshang Bank? How many Singapore banks make it to world's largest banks compared to Chinese banks?
    1
  19068.  @merlionsg7401  Then why are Singaporeans like Eric Phua looking down on China and despising our country? Eric Phua can s**t on China like "nobody's business," yet Singaporeans rush to defend him and attack me for my views?
    1
  19069.  @tongkong768  You said: "In the 'Chinese world' we reign supreme." PISA test: Singapore loses top spots to China in global education rankings youtu.be/x9pC_-zpH6g
    1
  19070. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19071. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  19072. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19073. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19074. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19075. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19076. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its own constitution.
    1
  19077. According to its own constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its own constitution.
    1
  19078. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19079. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19080. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  19081. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19082. 轮子只靠黑中国吃饭。
    1
  19083. This Chinese nation treasure remains relatively untarnished after thousands of years, and still retains its sharpness. One historian is said to have accidentally cut his hand/finger on the blade while handling this ancient weapon.
    1
  19084.  @engr_rioja  About the Spratly Islands, the North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    1
  19085. @Komrade Karebear Baken Maller Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China youtu.be/TtduKDpy4oc China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, as compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  19086.  @engr_rioja  I gave you the photograph of the diplomatic letter North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, but you're just disregarding it because it's from Wikipedia? Here's the website then. Source: Vietnamese Recognition and Support for China's Sovereignty Over Spratly Islands and Paracel Islands Prior to 1975 spratlys.org/collection/claims/vietnam/vietnam1.htm
    1
  19087.  @engr_rioja Chinese President Xi Jinping has pledged to waive debts for the least developed African countries that have both high debt burdens and diplomatic ties with China. Speaking at the opening of a summit with African leaders in Beijing, Xi said his country would offer an extra $US60 billion ($83 billion) in financing to African countries. Source: China waives debt, promises 'no imposition of will' on African nations smh.com.au/world/asia/china-waives-debt-promises-no-imposition-of-will-on-african-nations-20180904-p501nr.html "In addition, for Africa's least developed countries, heavily indebted and poor countries, landlocked developing countries and small island developing countries that have diplomatic relations with China, the debt they have incurred in the form of interest-free Chinese government loans due to mature by the end of 2018 will be exempted," Xi said.
    1
  19088.  @engr_rioja  Grab land? Why don't you tell all non-Native Americans, Canadians and Australians to get out of America and Australia and leave those lands to Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals?
    1
  19089.  @engr_rioja  The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is not even an official UN-agency unlike say, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) which is a recognised UN agency. Source: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1989486/united-nations-stresses-separation-hague-tribunal Since the PCA is not an official UN agency, then China reserves the right not to adhere to its jurisdiction regarding sovereignty over the Spratly Islands.
    1
  19090.  @engr_rioja  "And you're government also killed this Indonesian while fishing in this disputed sea" Firstly, the Communist Party of China wasn't the one fishing, then so why are you accusing our government of killing that Indonesian? According to your source, the Chinese government is investigating the issue, so why are you claiming our government "also killed this Indonesian"? The Philippines coastguard (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) shoot to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman Hong Shicheng (洪石成) yet which Philippine fishermen been killed by Chinese coastguard? None!
    1
  19091.  @engr_rioja  Why did you say earlier that my "government also killed this Indonesian while fishing in this disputed sea" when the Communist Party of China wasn't even fishing there? What about Tiananmen Square? Tiananmen Square is a famous parade square in Beijing where Mao Zedong proclaimed the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949 and where the Portrait of Mao is hung. Last year we recently celebrated the 70th anniversary of the People's Republic of China with a massive military parade on Tiananmen Square. Video: Highlights: China celebrates 70th anniversary with biggest ever military parade youtu.be/Lmp51YN-7wc I gave you the name of the 65-year old Chinese fishermen Hong Shicheng (洪石成) who was shot to death by Philippine Coastguard (patrol boat Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) what more do I need to say? And the Permanent Court of Arbitration is NOT even an official UN agency unlike the International Court of Justice, so China reserves the right not to adhere to PCA ruling. China first claimed South China Sea Islands back in 1947 when Republic of China published the 11 Dash Line Map (which the 9 Dash Line is based upon). Philippines did not object to China's claim. The Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence in 1946 that the Spratlys was not Philippine territory, both to not anger Chiang Kai-shek in China and because the Spratlys were not part of the Philippines per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America.
    1
  19092. I can see the endgame already. President Trump eventually has to step down after his term is over, and the next US president might just start reversing Trump's policies and lift the US-China tradewar, thus restoring US-China trade relations to their previous pre-tradewar levels. President Xi Jinping abolished the term limits, so he'll still be guiding China, years after Trump's tariffs are gone.
    1
  19093.  @Andy-P  But I'm glad your statement suggested that there are at least some in the West who would have picked (D) President Xi Jinping as their leader.
    1
  19094.  @MadebeatsChannel  Where does it show that they quarantined every single African who resides in Guangzhou?
    1
  19095.  @Bizz420  How is it racism? Prior to the epidemic, Chinese people treat Africans and Caucasian foreigners well (just ask them) and during the Wuhan lockdown, there was some discrimination against Chinese from Wuhan but no discrimination against Africans and Caucasian. But now USA is the epicentre, Europe have high cases and some Nigerians tested positive for Covid-19, and Chinese are suddenly racist? What logic is this?
    1
  19096.  @makabaangelsgarcon6063  No it's not racism, Chinese simply fear the virus, not other races. I mean, Chinese treat foreigners very well before the epidemic and when Wuhan was lockdown, some Chinese discriminated against people from Hubei province. Is that racism? No, Chinese people fear the virus, not other races. Now that USA is the epicentre, and coronavirus is raging across Europe and Africa, and some Nigerians tested positive for Covid-19, suddenly all the goodwill Chinese did is forgotten and Chinese are suddenly racist?
    1
  19097.  @Youdontshushh  The coronavirus Wuhan virology lab conspiracy has long been debunked by experts. Source: The Wuhan Virus Is Not a Lab-Made Bioweapon foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/29/coronavirus-china-lab-mortality-virology-wuhan-virus-not-bioweapon/
    1
  19098.  @MadebeatsChannel  Why don't you answer my question "Where does it show that they quarantined every African, every single one, who resides in Guangzhou?"
    1
  19099.  @purpleaki7135  "神州 Shenzhou we can't believe anything you people say" I cited evidence to support my arguments, but you just ignore my arguments, then you're just anti-China that's all.
    1
  19100.  @MadebeatsChannel  I'm still waiting for you to answer my question of "where does it show that they quarantined every African, every single one, who resides in Guangzhou?" Your link does not answer my question.
    1
  19101.  @MadebeatsChannel  You Africans come to China and complain about racism then why don't you go back to Africa? There are some Africans who come to China and overstayed their welcome here until their VISA expired. They destroy their passports, so Chinese authorities don't know which country to deport them back to, so aren't these Africans taking advantage of Chinese hospitality?
    1
  19102.  @makabaangelsgarcon6063  You Africans travel to non-African countries and complain racism against Africans, then why not get out of China? Africans literally invented the Race Card, and any bad thing happen to people of African descent outside of African, you African straight away bring up racism.
    1
  19103.  @makabaangelsgarcon6063  You come to China and accuse me of being in brainwashed bubble, that the government is lying to me, then why not get out of China? The Guangzhou government is doing what it believes necessary to protect the people of Guangzhou, yet some Africans refuse to comply with the law and cry racism?
    1
  19104.  @MadebeatsChannel  What racist? You people are just anti-China that's all. Before the outbreak, Chinese welcome Africans to Guangzhou to seek a better life away from Africa, and many overstayed their welcome and their VISA expired, yet many Chinese "give them face" and allow them to overstay, because we want to promote better African-Chinese relations. But suddenly the epidemic struck and now Chinese people are suddenly racist against foreigners. Why happen to all the previous goodwill Chinese shown to Africans in Guangzhou? All evaporated and now suddenly Chinese are racist? If Africans are quarantined in Guangzhou, then how can they be evicted and sleeping on the streets under bridges?
    1
  19105.  @souldrifter1572  Where's your factual evidence that the virus comes from China? There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  19106. @Ash Settle 911? China is not America, why are you calling American emergency hotline? You don't like how Chinese treat Africans, then you always welcome to go to America where the Caucasian American cop can just shoot the African American suspect first and ask questions later.
    1
  19107.  @phrancisco2847  Why you foreigners transform this into racial issue? Just because I'm Chinese, means I'm defending China? Chinese people fear the virus, not other races, and I already mentioned that some people discriminate against people from Hubei province (so that's not racism, isn't it?). I mean, even your African friend's Chinese wife is quarantined too so why make this into racial issue just because none of his Caucasian neighbours neither tested nor restricted? Did your African friend visit one of the Covid-19 cluster detected in Guangzhou? Africans travel to non-African countries and when something happens to them, some play the racial card and expect sympathy from others? You're always welcome to get out of China and return to your homeland you think you're being treated unfairly in China.
    1
  19108.  @phrancisco2847  If your African friend's wife and kids were quarantined then they will quarantined separately from him so how would he know they aren't tested too? Why would Guangzhou government quarantine his wife and kids without bothering to test them? I think your friend is trying to play the victim using race card here.
    1
  19109.  @phrancisco2847  Your African friend may not have visited the Covid-19 cluster in Guangzhou, but who knows, there might be some more unknown cluster in Guangzhou. Otherwise how was a cluster discovered in Nigerian restaurant in Guangzhou? And just because tested negative multiple times doesn't guarantee that your friend is free of Covid-19. There are cases where people tested multiple times with false negative when they are actually positive Video: China reports cases where testing results in false negatives youtu.be/rDEKOzE6dds
    1
  19110.  @phrancisco2847  So if it's in Dongguan then what's it got to do with Guangzhou then? And how do you expect me to verify your African friend's story? Surely his wife and kids will get tested (why quarantine them otherwise) so I think you friend is lying to you about his wife and kids not being tested in order to paint himself as victim. Here's article of 111 Africans tested positive for Covid-19 in Guangzhou. Source: China says 111 Africans in Guangzhou tested positive for Covid-19 thestar.com.my/news/regional/2020/04/14/china-says-111-africans-in-guangzhou-tested-positive-for-covid-19 A total of 111 African people in Guangzhou, capital of south China's Guangdong Province, have been tested positive for COVID-19 as of Monday, local authorities said.
    1
  19111.  @phrancisco2847  China has suspended entry for foreigners (with some exceptions) entering our country, so how did this Spaniard enter China during this period? Video: China temporarily suspends entry of foreigners youtu.be/cLz648-J6NA
    1
  19112.  @phrancisco2847  Why don't you explain how "A Spaniard returned to Dongguan with the virus, but no where did we read of Spaniards in Dongguan being quarantined." when China has clearly suspended entry of foreigners (with some exceptions) entering our country? And if that returning person from Spain was detained at the airport, then there's no need to start quarantining all Spanish people in Dongguan isn't it? Why is it you're trying to make this into racial issue?
    1
  19113.  @phrancisco2847  "If you don't mind, could you me the number of non-Africans in Guangzhou who tested positive for Covid-19?" Source: Here's Where Every Coronavirus Case Was Reported in Guangzhou thatsmags.com/china/post/30672/here-s-where-every-coronavirus-case-was-reported-in-guangzhou Of the 179 confirmed novel coronavirus cases, 127 were introduced from Hubei province, while 37 were directly tied to one or more of the cases imported from Hubei. Eleven of the infected patients in Guangzhou had no relation to the Hubei cases, while four cases are still being investigated. I really don't understand why African must transform this into racial issue and think they are the only ones discriminated because of race. Chinese people fear the virus, not other races and even some Chinese people from Hubei province get discriminated against, so it's clearly not an issue of racism,
    1
  19114.  @MadebeatsChannel  What makes you think I can't start this issue on Chinese Social Media? Here's video of foreigners in Qingdao jumping queue at car inspection station and the car inspector said to "give face" to the foreigners. But one Chinese man in the queue decided to call the police, and one of the foreigners (African American I presume) grab his paper slip and toss it away, and then complained "There's 8 million Chinese in the USA" and "I'll come back forever? Then tell the 8 million Chinese to get out" Video: youtu.be/VmeqgB7vxrs
    1
  19115.  @MadebeatsChannel  I already know what people think about Africans on Weibo, if you want to know then why don't you log on to Weibo and ask them yourself?
    1
  19116.  @MadebeatsChannel  There's a video of Nigerian who tested positive for Covid-19, but beaten an ICU nurse and even bit her face. 广州某医院ICU护士被确诊为新冠肺炎的尼日利亚籍黑人殴打并咬伤 youtu.be/4D9jsz4LsSU
    1
  19117.  @MadebeatsChannel  So a few Chinese discriminate against Africans suddenly means that all Chinese are racist? When Wuhan undergo lockdown, some people discriminate against people from Hubei province, so it's clearly not a matter of racism, Chinese people fear the virus, not other races. It's those Africans who travel to non-African countries and then play the Race Card when things don't go as they want.
    1
  19118.  @MadebeatsChannel  "神州 Shenzhou remember the pregnant couple that was denied entry into one of the gz hospital!" Did you even watch the video yourself? Firstly, the couple were in Dongguan, not Guangzhou. Secondly they don't speak a lick of Mandarin Chinese, so the nurse told them to wait while she tried to get a English translator. What's the point of the pregnant mother going for treatment at the hospital when they can't even communicate properly? What happens if there is miscommunication during treatment? In the end the hospital book another appointment at another hospital that can speak English, so again, how is this racism? If those Africans can speak Mandarin then treatment would proceed as normal, so it's a matter of language, not race. But you're trying to spin this off as racist incident by Chinese, when you didn't even watch the video carefully.
    1
  19119.  @MadebeatsChannel  Africans travel to non-African countries and whenever they encounter discrimination, some start playing the Race Card when things don't go their way. Who invented the Race Card if not Africans? Look at the African pregnant couple in Dongguan and had they been Caucasian pregnant couple that also don't speak a lick of Mandarin Chinese, then they will be turned away with another appointment booked at another hospital. Like I said, it's not a racism issue, it's language barrier issue, but you just try and paint its being racist against skin tone, because you think Race Card is some sort of privilege in non-African countries.
    1
  19120.  @purpleaki7135  Didn't you say: "神州 Shenzhou we can't believe anything you people say" earlier or something?
    1
  19121.  @Miquelalalaa  When did I deny these schools? Don't American kids also learn American propaganda and history, in order to forge cohesion and patriotism, among the next generation of Americans? Then why can't China teach Uighurs Mandarin and train them in skills necessary to prepare them for the workforce? Watch the video and the Uighurs can leave by bus at least once a week. While at school they can also paint, sing and dance, play musical instruments or engage in sports like basketball. So what's wrong with this then?
    1
  19122.  @sarajane1719  Who's forcing anyone to eat? Do you see any of the Uighurs being force fed?
    1
  19123.  *•:Monica:•*  As far as I know, African Swine Flu is harmless to humans, and nobody has died after consuming pork infected with African Swine Flu. So what's your problem then?
    1
  19124.  @sarajane1719  When did I ever said that? Just like earlier who's forcing anyone to eat? You are just putting words in my mouth when I clearly never said anything.
    1
  19125.  @LancesArmorStriking  What's wrong with commenting on videos related to China? I commented on this thread over 2 weeks ago as you can see.
    1
  19126.  @snowfrog2721  China has beaten the US in the battle for world opinion over the handling of coronavirus, according to new polling, with only three countries out of 53 believing the US has dealt with the pandemic better than its superpower rival. Source: Only three out of 53 countries say US has handled coronavirus better than China theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/15/only-three-out-of-53-countries-say-us-has-handled-coronavirus-better-than-china The 53-country survey of 120,000 people by the German polling firm Dalia Research and the Alliance of Democracies Foundation, an organisation headed by the former Nato secretary general Anders Fogh Rasmussen, reveals deep dissatisfaction with US leadership.
    1
  19127.  @tommieberggren3324  The batsoup coronavirus origins have been debunked by experts. Turns out those widely circulated photos and videos were from an island in Indonesia. Source: Is bat soup a delicacy in China? We debunk a rumour on the origin of the coronavirus observers.france24.com/en/20200203-china-coronavirus-bat-soup-debunk-videos-viral-palau-indonesia
    1
  19128.  @tommieberggren3324  Then you're just racist against Chinese that's all, even after I debunked Covid-19 bat soup origins, you still continue hate China and make racist comments against Chinese.
    1
  19129.  @tommieberggren3324  You clearly hate Chinese, please don't pretend you're not racist when you constantly insult Chinese as bat eaters. Why pretend you're not anti-China when you clearly are?
    1
  19130.  @tommieberggren3324  China has been successful in containing the Covid-19 pandemic, why hasn't Western democracies been as successful as China in containing Covid? Instead of solving your own problems, you rather point fingers at China and make racist insults against Chinese?
    1
  19131.  @tommieberggren3324  China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    1
  19132.  @tommieberggren3324  The USA is the single largest contributor to WHO at $893 million, 10 times the amount that China contributed at $86 million, yet you're claiming China owns WHO? Source: The U.S. gives far more money to the WHO than China does axios.com/us-gives-more-money-who-china-does-dbf670e3-6855-41b4-b976-8edaf40f7b97.html So how exactly is the WHO in China's pay?
    1
  19133.  @tommieberggren3324  Corruption? I already shown that USA gave more than 10x the amount that China gives to the World Health Organization, if there is corruption then the WHO is likely to be in US pocket than China's. You can't refute my points so you just claim my links are useless.
    1
  19134.  @tommieberggren3324  Where's your evidence that China pays WHO leaders to be more China-centric? You disregard my links, but offer none of your own? The USA contributed 10 times the amount of money that China contributes to the WHO, if anything, it's more likely that WHO is in USA's pocket, not China's.
    1
  19135.  @tommieberggren3324  If you want to talk about prison populations then it's actually America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate
    1
  19136.  @tommieberggren3324  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  19137.  @thetruth5011  Many countries have adapted Chinese food to suit their tastes. For example: American Chinese cuisine has General Tso's chicken, Chop Suey, Crab Rangoon, etc. Australian Chinese cuisine has Lemon Chicken, Chow Sam See, Mustard Prawns, etc. Canadian Chinese cuisine has _Ginger Beef, Newfoundland Chow Mein, Thunder Bay Bon Bons, etc. Caribbean Chinese cuisine has Cha Chee Kai, Jerk Chow Mein, Char Siu Pork Dhalpouri, etc. Filipino Chinese cuisine has Batchoy (肉脆), Hopia (好餅), Kiampong (鹹飯) etc. Indian Chinese cuisine has Manchurian Mutton, Jalfrezi Chicken, Hunan Chicken, etc. Japanese Chinese cuisine has Ramen (拉麺), Chashu (叉燒), Mābō-dōfu (麻婆豆腐), etc. Korean Chinese cuisine has Jajangmyeon (炸酱面), Jjamppong (焖面), Tangsuyuk (糖醋肉), etc. ... and many other countries have their own version of Chinese cuisine adapted to local tastes. Sources: American Chinese cuisine wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Chinese_cuisine Australian Chinese cuisine wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Chinese_cuisine Canadian Chinese cuisine wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian-Chinese_cuisine Caribbean Chinese cuisine wikipedia.org/wiki/Caribbean_Chinese_cuisine Filipino Chinese cuisine wikipedia.org/wiki/Filipino_Chinese_cuisine Indian Chinese cuisine wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Chinese_cuisine Indonesian Chinese cuisine wikipedia.org/wiki/Indonesian_Chinese_cuisine Japanese Chinese cuisine wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Chinese_cuisine Korean Chinese cuisine wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Chinese_cuisine Malaysian Chinese cuisine wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysian_Chinese_cuisine Pakistan Chinese cuisine wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistani_Chinese_cuisine Puerto Rican Chinese cuisine wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rican_Chinese_cuisine
    1
  19138.  @thetruth5011  I just gave you evidence, you're just going to ignore it? Experts estimate that there are more than 40,000 Chinese restaurants in the USA alone. That already means that there are more Chinese restaurants in USA than the combined total of Burger King, Kentucky Fried Chicken, McDonald’s, and Wendy’s restaurants. Source: Today, there are more Chinese restaurants in the United States than the combined total of Burger King, Kentucky Fried Chicken, McDonald’s, and Wendy’s restaurants. statspotting.com/stunning-there-are-more-chinese-restaurants-in-the-us-than/ Given that the % population of Chinese/Asian Americans is much smaller than Caucasian Americans, this implies that more Caucasian customers are visiting Chinese restaurants given that there are more Chinese restaurants than Western Fast Food restaurants. It implies that Chinese restaurants are catering to larger populations than the Chinese American population.
    1
  19139.  @yc-tai  Biden is too old, his mental health is taking a beating and he appears to be in cognitive decline. Why'd the Americans elected such a leader to lead their country?
    1
  19140.  @MarkYeung1  Trump did not care about China's internal issues like Hong Kong, Xinjiang, etc he was interested in his trade deal with China that's all. Whereas, Biden is arguably even worse, he's rallying the U.S allies and forming an anti-China alliance, and pursuing so-called "human rights" front against China. I would bet that under Biden, U.S and China are more closer to potential war than during the Trump administration.
    1
  19141. Canada is located beside USA, but Australia is located closer to Asia than America and China is Australia's biggest trading partner, yet Australian politicians like Scott Morrison are fanning the flames of anti-China sentiment in Australia and following US's anti-China stance.
    1
  19142. +maca6 How do you expect humans to ever "mature" in gene-editing technology, if our hands are constantly kept tied and we can't do any experiments? Maybe nature had intended that humans discover CRISPR some day and unlock gene-editing for ourselves. Already, there have been plenty of genetically modified (GM) foods that are consumed on a daily basis. I mean, look at this, Chinese scientists had literally discovered immunity to HIV through genetics. This is the so-called "Holy Grail" of the medical world, or the "cure for cancer" that medical professionals have been talking about and striving to achieve their entire lives. Yet you say we shouldn't explore this technology further?
    1
  19143. +maca6 Then how exactly are humans going to acquire maturity, if our hands are tied and we can't do experiments? Must humans forever remain immature and ignorant of the truth then? I don't see what China has to do with America, both are countries run by humans, so what's the point? And how do you know for sure whether Nature is more mature than humans? Nature is a actually a random, spontaneous, haphazard mixing of genes, not some higher intelligent lifeform that knows exactly what's its doing, yet you are calling Nature mature? Those scientists have never stopped their search for the Theory of Everything, and that's how it should be. Nobody is going to hand the TOE to us humans, unless we actually strive for it. And lastly, what about my point that Chinese scientists have discovered the cure to AIDS, through granting immunity to HIV through genetics? This is the "Holy Grail" of the medical industry, and the "cure-for-cancer" that medical professionals have been talking about all their life, and now its just staring you in the face. How can you deny it then? Furthermore, today happens to be 1st December, which is World's AIDS Day, promoting awareness of the AIDS pandemic and how many lives were lost to this disease every day. And we have the cure right in our hands and the ability to halt this disease once and for all. And you still claim humans aren't mature? Then when will we ever be? If we don't try?
    1
  19144. +maca6 If Chinese scientists can use gene-editing to develop immunity to HIV, then isn't it "using the genes"? What's the difference here? Also, "prevention is always better than cure" If our future kids have immunity to HIV (thanks to gene-editing) then there will be no need to undergo AIDS treatment such as taking 10 tablets a day, when our kids already have immunity to HIV themselves.
    1
  19145. +maca6 Humans have been editing genes by procreation for millions of years, but it is a slow and completely random splicing of the parents genes, removing old defects while creating some new defects. Now, we have the technology to narrow the scope and control directly the genes that are being edited, in the form of CRISPR, so why can't we utilize it? How is using CRISPR equivalent to changing parents without really knowing them? And again, if you say changing the genes now is premature, then how are we ever going to improve at all, if we are forever stuck and our hands are tied behind our backs? Our scientists obviously can't learn anything new if we do nothing and don't allow experimentation with the procedure and to observe the results!
    1
  19146. maca6 Why are you abusing vulgarities against me? I don't resort to profanities against you just because your views differ from mine. And China is already on the path back to our feet, as China is world's 2nd largest economy, the manufacturing hub of the world, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd largest military budget, and China has strong global presence and is a highly influential player of world politics. I mean, China has even sent our own people into space! In 2003, Yang Liwei 杨利伟, became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, onboard the Shenzhou-5 神舟五号 spacecraft, made China the 3rd country to independently send humans into space, after USA and Russia. China is the 1st Asian country to do so, and even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not independently sent people into space through their own space programs. Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtube.com/watch?v=tIviKg4Mduw So why should China "slow down" simply because you say so? China is seemingly already leading the world with CRISPR so why stop now?
    1
  19147. +maca6 China has even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where a Chinese astronaut exited the Shenzhou-7 神舟七号 spacecraft in 2008 and ventured into the vacuum of space under low gravity conditions, making China the 3rd country in the world to independently conduct "spacewalk" of our own. Video: China Shenzhou 7 Space Walk Live!! Full Success! youtube.com/watch?v=gMxQEHfU6hM So why should China "slow down" and wait for maturity? How is China ever going to mature to if people like you are against China doing anything on our own? I mean, look at your straw man arguments like comparing with Formula 1 drivers, and so on? Look, you even resort to hurling insults against me, instead of attempting to refute my points.
    1
  19148. +maca6 You can't refute my points so you resort to hurling insults against me? China has even launched spacestations such as Tiangong-1 in 2011 and Tiangong-2 in 2016, making China the 3rd country in the world to launch spacestations, so how is this not science? Why are you constantly insulting me with terms Lik idiot?
    1
  19149. wantafanta01 I agree. Introducing term limits just means the president doesn't have to take responsibility for his actions. For United States, having a 2-party system, means the two parties constantly blame each other for mistakes and only make plans that last 4-8 years and expire once their term is over.
    1
  19150.  @augustuswoods4548  But look at the damage from the fallout of the George Floyd incident? The USA is suffering from destructive transparency whereas China is benefiting from constructive opaqueness.
    1
  19151.  @richarde.halliburton8022  I'm making a logical statement, if you think mainland Chinese are brainwashed, then shouldn't you think people in Taiwan are brainwashed into thinking democracy is the best form of government? Why do you seem to think liberal democracy is somehow "the best form of government" so much such that no other form of government is permitted? People in mainland China have seen our lives transformed under authoritarian single-party CPC leadership, from a dirt-poor country in the past, into an economic juggernaut today. Just like the people in Taiwan have seen their island transformed under the authoritarian single-party rule of the KMT for 38 years of Martial Law. Why then do you think all countries should gravitate towards "liberal democracy"? Have you ever considered the possibility that you, that people in the West have been brainwashed into thinking no other forms of government are permissible? Because that's what you seem to be advocating.
    1
  19152.  @richarde.halliburton8022  About Western democracy, what makes you think allowing ordinary people to participate in elections and political decision-making is a wide idea? Ordinary people are fickle and they make poor voters for several reasons: -Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (i.e. They may not turn up to vote, or they submit blank votes) -Ordinary people may base their vote on emotions, not logic (i.e. Many British don't like immigrants, so majority voted for Brexit) -Ordinary people are susceptible to foreign influences (i.e. Russian interference in US elections) -Ordinary people may simply lack awareness of the country's real political situation, to make informed decisions regarding the country's future. There's a host of other problems associated with democracy. The ordinary citizen is simply not suitable as a voter base to participate in political decisions that will impact the country's future, for the reasons I mentioned above. So why not let those who know how to govern, govern? That's what China is doing and look at how successful China is. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  19153.  @augustuswoods4548  I disagree with your statement that "Teachers need to make a judgement call on whether students have the maturity level to handle certain debate topics." especially with regards to politics in China's case. Because most political protests in Chinese territories were by university students, who've been raised inside the cloistered world of education and ideal theories, and haven't step out into the real working world, get a job, apply for an apartment, settle down and start a family. Yet these university students already think that they know the best way to govern China. For example, look at Joshua Wong in HK, and in my opinion, he's just a kid, too young to already think he knows the best way to govern HK.
    1
  19154.  @richarde.halliburton8022  Ordinary people are simply unsuited to political decision-making, they tend to lack understanding of politics, vote irresponsibly, vote on emotions not logic, and so on. Why then, should ordinary people be allowed to participate in elections that will impact the country's future?
    1
  19155.  @richarde.halliburton8022  I use the term "Western Democracy" because there are numerous ways to define what is "Democracy", and I am referring to the "Western brand of democracy" that originated in the West. And yes, Marxism originated in the West and Communism is a very specific definition, so there is no need to add the prefix "Western", to distinguish it from other forms of Communism. Because there are none.
    1
  19156.  @richarde.halliburton8022  The U.S constitution has remained literally unchanged for 100-150 years. Today, USA is suffering from what's called "political stagnation", there is ineffective leadership, loss of identity, lack of social cohesion, denial, and especially increased "scapegoating" (blaming China for America's woes) and "victimisation" (America is a victim of China). Ideally, political systems should be evolving with the times, instead of stagnating.
    1
  19157.  @richarde.halliburton8022  I would say the earliest prehistoric human hunter-gather societies were Communist in nature, since all resources and property hunted were shared with all members of a group, in accordance with individual needs, which is the basis of communism as defined by Marxist orthodoxy.
    1
  19158.  Don Drumpf  Those are some very good good points. But perhaps it would be better served to direct it towards those anti-China people, rather than being addressed to me.
    1
  19159.  Don Drumpf  Anti-China sentiment is growing in the West, just look at the tragic Atlanta shooting of 8 people, 6 of whom were Asian Americans. Yet the Atlanta police try to rule out racism and humanise the Caucasian shooter.
    1
  19160.  Don Drumpf  When African American (Rayshard Brooks) was shot to death in Atlanta, there were Black Lives Matter protests. Yet when 6 Asian women were shot to death in Atlanta, the Atlanta police dismisses possibility of hate crime.
    1
  19161.  Don Drumpf  The US government and politicians would rather much focus on China's domestic issues in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region, rather than deal with their own domestic issues back home in America.
    1
  19162.  Don Drumpf   President Joe Biden and VP Kamala Harris don't seem to care about Atlanta shootings, even though Kamala Harris is herself an Asian American. I just watched her speech on Atlanta shooting, and did she really care?
    1
  19163.  Don Drumpf  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  19164.  Don Drumpf  For there to be multilateralism, there needs to be a change in the US superiority attitude, and no other country is capable of putting the USA in its place, except possibly China. Americans need first acknowledge that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are set and many economists believe China's economy will eventually surpass the USA's economy in the foreseeable future.
    1
  19165.  @kammonkam4905  Lu Muying's lung scans did not indicate evidence of pneumonia, which was why she was counted as asymptomatic and wasn't counted as dying from Covid.
    1
  19166.  @jordandthornburg  Look at what happened in Hong Kong, the number of deaths of elderly people is tragic and China is taking necessary steps to prevent unnecessary deaths.
    1
  19167.  @jordandthornburg  Which negative testing person has been put into a room with positive testing people?
    1
  19168.  @jordandthornburg  What's the name of the people who have been saying that?
    1
  19169.  @jordandthornburg  So I'm taking that you have no way to verify that the video is true? If that's your argument, then I've so much footage of only positive testing people are being isolated.
    1
  19170.  @jordandthornburg  I mean, you're saying that regardless if people test positive or negative, they are isolated? Then it means the whole 25 million population of Shanghai should be in those isolation centers, since there are only two outcomes, testing either positive or negative. So how does your logic hold water?
    1
  19171.  @jordandthornburg  So you heard them talking to a Chinese person, then what did they say? Could you quote me the exact words they said? You said: "You have an unreasonable standard of evidence." All I'm asking is for the name of such persons, so that I can do further research, but you can't even give me that, yet you just blindly believe this to be true without thinking about it?
    1
  19172.  @jordandthornburg  Excuse me, but you're the one making claims that negative testing people are being mixed together with the positive testing ones, yet not only did you fail to give me proof, you just throw it back at me, claiming that "神州 Shenzhou you can’t give me footage of people NOT being brought there." Then what sort of troll behavior is this? You can't prove something is true, so instead you tell me that I can't prove that it's not not true?
    1
  19173.  @jordandthornburg  But your logic is that negative testing people are being put together with positive testing people, and how does that make sense? Whether you test positive or negative, you'll be put together then what's the point to differentiating between positive and negative? Can't you see the flaw in your reasoning?
    1
  19174.  @宋庆-i4m  Seems like income has resumed on Apr in your example. So to continue your example: May: 3000 - 1500 = 1500 (saving) Jun: 3000 - 1500 = 3000 (saving) ... Therefore, you've earned back the $3000 that you could have saved earlier. Plus, you've helped prevented further unnecessary loss of lives if the lockdown was successful.
    1
  19175.  @宋庆-i4m  The point was (and I quote your words): "Where is the part I make up the lost $3000 I could have saved?" and by Jun, you would have recouped the $3000 that you could have saved. How did I miss the point?
    1
  19176.  @宋庆-i4m  It wasn't exactly the same money note for note, but it's apparent that you earned back the $3000 that you could have saved in Feb and Mar, after Jun if you followed my continuation of your example. So how did I miss your point? You claiming that you could have saved $6000 in Jun is merely "shifting the goalpost" after I have answered your question. You said: "神州 Shenzhou I did say "I could have saved?" ....right?" Yeah, but it's apparent that you've made up the lost $3000 that you could have saved by Jun if you followed my example.
    1
  19177.  @宋庆-i4m  You said: ""I could have saved" is the key here" Actually, the key part of your question was "Where is the part I make up the lost $3000". That is the part that forms the basis of your question and the part you want answered. And the answer is by Jun, you would have made up the $3000 that you lost. It's not the exact money note for note, but you've clearly recouped the $3000. You said: "and it was clearly stated not another $3000 dollars" Yes. Another $3000 would mean $6000, but that is not what we are talking about, this is the new goalpost you created claiming to you could have saved $6000 in Jun, when the point is about making up the lost $3000. And I've illustrated in my example that you would have by Jun. You said: "so yeah the guy/gal would never get that money back." I thought all this while we were talking about you recouping your $3000, why are we talking about some guy/girl? Anyway, he/she would have gotten that money back by Jun like my example illustrated.
    1
  19178.  @宋庆-i4m  Firstly, what you wrote is not just a sentence, it's a question, and the "Where is the part I make up the lost $3000" forms the basis of your question (like Where, What, Who, When, & How), so I have clearly answered your question that by Jun, you would have made up the $3000 that you lost. This is the answer to your question of "Where is the part I make up the lost $3000" so I have answered succinctly. Yet you just keep on moving the goalpost, claiming you could have saved $6000 in Jun, but that's not the point of your question. Your question was where is the part you made up the $3000 you lost, which I have answered succinctly above.
    1
  19179.  @宋庆-i4m  "神州 Shenzhou a "question" is a type of "sentence"" Yeah, that's exactly what I wrote earlier. I clearly wrote: "宋庆 Firstly, what you wrote is not just a sentence, it's a question," so I wasn't disputing that a question is not a sentence. But it appears like you're employing the strawman fallacy by replacing my argument with one I never made, and then attacking that argument. Also, I've long answered your question of "Where is the part I make up the lost $3000" pointing that that by Jun, you would've made up the $3000 that you lost.
    1
  19180. 大哥你用的国旗是对的。。。中国万岁。
    1
  19181.  @bravequeen77  You should wave the flag more proudly. Go crazy with it! 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳
    1
  19182. I think the Communist Party of China shouldn't change their name. China today is following "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics" where China is in the primary stage of socialism and needed to engage in economic growth before pursuing a more egalitarian form of socialism, with the eventual goal being communism (as described in Marxist orthodoxy). Communism is China's eventual goal, changing the name means changing China's eventual goal.
    1
  19183. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19184. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning. China's Coming Financial Meltdown 2020. NYT. Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak 2021 Bloomberg. Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize 2022. Bloomberg China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n 2023. Bloomberg. No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  19185. Precisely. The Western MSM is painting an alternative reality of the situation to its audiences. Yet whenever I bring this up, some Westerners (not all) just laugh at me, and claimed I've been "brainwashed" by Chinese media, while claiming Western media is "free" and trustworthy.
    1
  19186. China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. Source: Fishing Industry in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishing_industry_in_China China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_producing_countries_of_agricultural_commodities
    1
  19187.  @icefrost5355  什么意思？我看不懂你写的字。
    1
  19188.  @icefrost5355  用拼音写什么？
    1
  19189. China is a meritocracy where politicians who fulfill their promises get elected into power. The U.S is a democracy where politicians who make the most attractive promises get elected into power.
    1
  19190. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19191. German Chanceller Angela Merkel Served 4 terms while President Xi is only entering his 3rd term in office.
    1
  19192. German Chanceller Angela Merkel Served 4 terms while President Xi is only entering his 3rd term in office.
    1
  19193. +Ted Alert How would you consider her face cute? Look at world wide standards of beauty and Vivi wouldn't be considered a supermodel by any chance. And I never said anything about her personality or intelligence, so why are you bringing that up? The thing with Western culture is that you people must always "insert" a compliment or two (even when you clearly don't mean it) in order to appear politically correct. You see a fat person, but you can't call them fat (especially if their a girl) because its the politically incorrect thing to do. Likewise, you see someone who is ugly, but you lie and tell them they are beautiful.
    1
  19194.  @zackk4969  What genocide in Xinjiang? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  19195.  @zackk4969  Where does it say that "A Madman's Diary" 《狂人日記》 is based on a true story?
    1
  19196. @UC2Rb0UsROmVAUC4zK7-WwRw According to Wikipedia: A Madman's Diary it says: Lu Xun was an avant-garde Chinese writer who was celebrated for his fictional works that illustrates social and political criticism of early 20th century Chinese society and one amongst his great works of is the “Diary of a Madman”. The diary form was inspired by Nikolai Gogol's short story "Diary of a Madman", as was the idea of the madman who sees reality more clearly than those around him. Then how is "A Madman's Diary" 《狂人日記》 based on a true story?
    1
  19197.  @zackk4969  What genocide in Xinjiang? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  19198.  @zackk4969  “Diary of a Madman”.《狂人日记》 is a work of fiction by Lu Xun, then why are you confusing fiction with reality?
    1
  19199.  @zackk4393  "神州 Shenzhou Stop saying US has a genocide of its native Indians." They aren't "Indians", they're Native Americans, why are you trying to make it sound like Native Americans aren't even from America? And when did I ever said anything about American genocide of Native Americans? All I shown you was that the Uighur population in China tripled in size from 3 million (1953) to 10 million (2010) so what genocide are you talking about?
    1
  19200.  @zackk4393  But according to Wikipedia: A Madman's Diary, the diary form was inspired by Nikolai Gogol's short story "Diary of a Madman", as was the idea of the madman who sees reality more clearly than those around him. It's a work of fiction, not based on a true story.
    1
  19201.  @zackk4393  Malcolm X spoke admiringly of Mao's global leadership at a rally in Harlem in November 1964. "They used to have a saying that one doesn't have a Chinaman's chance. But they don't say that any more. They used that expression back when China was weak. But now that Mao Zedong has been successful in making China a strong country, the Chinese have more chance than anybody else. So this saying has become outdated. Well just as it took a strong China to give a Chinese person respect wherever that Chinese person is found on this earth, when we get a strong Africa, the person of African origin or African ancestry will be respected anyplace on this earth, even in America. But he will not be respected in America until Africa is strong, just as the Chinaman wasn't respected abroad until China became strong." - Malcom X
    1
  19202.  @zackk4393  So you agree with Martin Luther King Jr, then have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? Here's a short 2-min video of 11 Chinese cities. Video:youtu.be/WyH7Af4Dt7E
    1
  19203.  @zackk4393  China's current political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then why should China end our system? Why should China do that? Because you say so? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  19204. China's Covid-19 response is to save lives at the expense of businesses. USA's Covid-19 response is to save businesses at the expense of lives.
    1
  19205.  @unkn0wn3ntity86  Some of the Hong Kong protestors are seen waving United States Flag 🇺🇲 as well as United Kingdom Flag 🇬🇧 so is it a possibility that these are the foreign powers secretly sponsoring the continuation of the Hong Kong protests? I mean, the HK protests have been ongoing for 6 months now, so is it possible that some foreign anti-China powers are funding the protests to drive a wedge between Hong Kong and the mainland?
    1
  19206.  @unkn0wn3ntity86  Like you said, that's just allegations of espionage that's all. China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said that Beijing had never -- and would never -- interfere in another country's affairs. "Recently some Australian politicians, organizations and media have shown a high degree of tension on the issues involving China. Some might have been in a state of panic," he said. "They constantly fabricate the so-called Chinese spies and infiltration into Australia. I think no matter how extraordinary the plot is or how the trick has been refurbished, the lie is eventually a lie."
    1
  19207.  @unkn0wn3ntity86  You're just a single person waving Chinese flag in Canberra, but in Hong Kong, several protestors can be seen waving United States and United Kingdom Flags, so are these the foreign anti-China powers supporting the continuation of the HK protests? Otherwise why the HK protests last so long, until 6 months? Who's funding the HK protests? And do you have any actual evidence that China is influencing Australia politics? Australia is democracy and the Australians vote for their leaders so how can China influence the Australians' votes?
    1
  19208.  @KIMJUNGEUNism  Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson actually invited Mike Pompeo to visit Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region and see that there are no human rights abuses taking place in Xinjiang. Source: China Invites Pompeo to Visit Xinjiang, Says There Are No Rights Abuses newsweek.com/china-invites-mike-pompeo-visit-xinjiang-no-rights-abuses-1518294 But Pompeo rejected China's offer, yet he continues his anti-China rhetoric nevertheless.
    1
  19209.  @TruckTaxiMoveIt  According to a report by Credit Suisse, the number of wealthy Chinese people has overtaken the number of rich Americans for the first time. Source: theguardian(dot)com/business/2019/oct/21/china-overtakes-us-in-rankings-of-worlds-richest-people The bank’s annual wealth survey found there were 100 million Chinese people among the world’s top 10% of richest people, compared with 99 million in the US.
    1
  19210.  @davidleomorley889  What makes you think Chinese people are oppressed? That China is going to explode? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. So what makes you think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all. Go to your neighbourhood and how many Chinese nationals are in your vincinity? Or go to your local university and ask your college students how they feel about the "Chinese" competition.
    1
  19211.  @davidleomorley889  "神州 Shenzhou The fact that 90% of the candidates that won in Hong Kong election were people who wanted MORE freedom..." That's not exactly correct, they voted for "pro-democracy" candidates, which doesn't necessarily equate to "MORE freedom". Besides, I thought you're talking about the mainland government and mainland population, but were you actually talking about Hong Kong?
    1
  19212.  @davidleomorley889  Defend the United States? From the Middle East? Look at China and China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If USA is defending America, then why are American troops dying on foreign soil in the Middle East, so far away from the American mainland? What danger is there to the American mainland to speak of?
    1
  19213.  @davidleomorley889  Look at China and according to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Wikipedia: Poverty in China Source: statista(dot)com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china And this was all achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  19214.  @davidleomorley889  Let me ask you, have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  19215.  @davidleomorley889  You haven't been to China yourself, then why you already have such a negative view on our country? So many foreign expats come to China and leave with a good impression on China, remarking on how safe China is, how clean it is and (believe it or not) even how free they felt in China. Here is a short 2-min video of the beautiful night view of 11 Chinese cities. Video: /watch?v=mzR8Scsd33g I mean, if you yourself haven't even set foot in the country, then of course, you only hear the negative without experiencing the positive. Why come to China and see what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  19216.  @davidleomorley889  If you scroll up to our conversation, all I did was ask you "But why should China adopt Western democracy? China's political system has shown to be viable for our country" but you suddenly replied with "China is ready to explode with oppression" so I replied that "Chinese tourists, Chinese international students are everywhere" so how are Chinese people oppressed? You're the one hurling personal insults against me, such as calling me brainwashed, when I have been using logic to debate my points.
    1
  19217.  @davidleomorley889  "神州 Shenzhou I believe the links I provided explain my point and provide evidence for my position" Excuse me, but where exactly did you post any links whatsoever? I've scrolled through this comment thread several times but not once did you provide any links whatsoever. What are you even talking about?
    1
  19218.  @davidleomorley889  Before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule from 1841-1997, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as British colony?
    1
  19219.  @davidleomorley889  What 8 different comment that were 8 different links to 8 different YouTube videos that were critical of China? You have posted 0 links thus far, so why are you lying about having posted links?
    1
  19220.  @davidleomorley889  You're a liar and you clearly did not post any 8 different comments with 8 different links to 8 different videos criticising China. Even after I log out of my 神州 Shenzhou account and return to this comment thread, there's 0 links posted by you, so why are you claiming that you posted 8 links then?
    1
  19221.  @davidleomorley889  Excuse me but when did I ever proclaim my superiority? You're the one looking down on China, even though China has been successful under our current political system. You haven't even set foot into China, yet you already have such a negative view about my country? Why don't you come to China and see what life is like here for yourself? According to the World Tourism Rankings, China is the world's 4th most visited country, after France, Spain and the United States. China is also the most popular tourist destination in Asia, surpassing even other Asian destinations like Japan, Korea, India, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, etc. Source: Wikipedia: World Tourism rankings
    1
  19222.  @davidleomorley889  Yes, that's the 64th comment, so this comment is the 65th, so there's nothing wrong with the system. I've also counted that you posted a total of 17 comments at this point under this thread by Truck Taxi. Can you count how many comments have you posted on this thread so far? Or you try logging out of your YouTube account, then return to this comment thread without signing in. Because you clearly posted 0 links on this thread.
    1
  19223.  @davidleomorley889  You yourself admitted that you never set foot in China yourself. About infrastructure, China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time, such as in the following videob Video: /watch?v=fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours.
    1
  19224.  @davidleomorley889  Did you count how many comments you posted? As of now, you've posted 19 comments and none of those comments contain any links to any videos, so where exactly did you post any links in your comments? Did you try signing out of your account and returning to this same comment thread? I've signed out of my 神州 Shenzhou account and return to this comment thread and nowhere did I see any 8 different links to 8 different videos like you claimed.
    1
  19225.  @davidleomorley889  Did you count how many comments you posted? You've posted a total of 23 comments thus far, of which none of then contain any links to videos whatsoever. Even after I sign out of my 神州 Shenzhou account and return to this comment thread, you posted 0 links so why are you lying about posting 8 different links to 8 different videos?
    1
  19226.  @davidleomorley889  About democracy, why do you think allowing ordinary people to vote in political decision-making is a wise idea? In my opinion, ordinary people aren't suited to making political decisions because of various reasons outlined below: -Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (e.g they may not turn out to vote, or they submit blank votes) Ordinary people may vote based on emotions not logic (e.g Many British people don't like immigrants, so majority voted for Brexit) -Ordinary people may be susceptible to influence by foreign powers (e.g Russian interference in US elections) -Ordinary people may simply lack political awareness of their country's political situation, to make informed decisions regarding their future. Why not let those people who know how to govern, govern? That's what China is doing and look at how successful China is under our own political system?
    1
  19227.  @davidleomorley889  You can't refute my points, so you start resorting to petty personal insults against me for my views? Where's your 8 different comments, showing 8 different links to 8 different videos? I don't see any of your so-called links, even if I signed out of my account and return to this comment thread. Have you signed out of your YouTube account and return to this comment thread? You clearly did not post any links so why did you lied about it?
    1
  19228.  @davidleomorley889  Why don't you answer my question many comments you posted? As of now, you posted 26 comments, none of which contain links so why did you lied that you posted 8 different links to 8 different videos? Have you signed out of your YouTube account and return to this comment thread? You have posted absolutely no links at all, so why did you lied?
    1
  19229.  @davidleomorley889  If you look at democracy throughout history, then democracy has a long history of failure. Athenian Democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, even Republic of Rome failed. These proto-democracies weren't successfully, and democracy was never popular outside of Greece in the ancient world. But look at China's history and China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  19230.  @davidleomorley889  Look, China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: /watch?v=tIviKg4Mduw Source: Wikipedia: Yang Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is also the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  19231.  @davidleomorley889  Simple facts dissappear? The simple fact is that you did not post any links at all, so why did you lied about posting 8 different links to 8 different videos? Have you signed out of your YouTube account and return to this comment thread? Nowhere did you actually post any links, so why did you lie about posting 8 different links to 8 different videos?
    1
  19232.  @davidleomorley889  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: /watch?v=9PAkbT4kTpI&t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    1
  19233.  @davidleomorley889  You're running from the fact that you did not post any links here in this thread. Nowhere did you ever post your 8 different links to 8 different videos, so why did you lied about posting links then?
    1
  19234.  @davidleomorley889  Earlier you mentioned the International Space Station, but China has even launched space stations into orbit, the world's 3rd to do so after USA and USSR. China's first prototype space station, Tiangong-1 was launched in 2011, followed by Tiangong-2 in 2016. There was even a "space lecture" where Chinese taikonaut in space gave a lecture to her students on the ground from onboard Tiangong-1, demonstrating simple micro-gravity experiments in space. China's Space Lecture Video: /watchv=OUAuZnpoZ58 By doing this, we are showing our kids (and future generations of Chinese) that China is both ancient civilization as well as a modern space nation, capable of achieving equally impressive feats as the Westerners in space. China is no longer the sick man of Asia, in fact, China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, and India have not launched space stations of their own into orbit.
    1
  19235.  @davidleomorley889  You clearly lied about posting 8 different links to 8 different videos. Nowhere in this comment thread did you ever posted a single link at all, so why are you lying about posting links? Have you signed out of your YouTube account and return to this comment thread? There are no links posted by you, so why continue upholding your blatant lie?
    1
  19236.  @davidleomorley889  In 2016, China completed world's largest radio telescope, the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) also known as Tianyan (天眼 'Eye of the Heavens'). The 1,650-foot-wide dish was built in China's Guizhou Province and will help scientists learn more about the universe's early days, detect low-frequency gravitational waves and hunt for signals that may have been produced by distant alien civilizations. Source: space(dot)com/33357-china-largest-radio-telescope-alien-life.html The larger the radio dish, the more sensitive it is to picking up signals from space and FAST's potential to discover an alien civilization will be 5 to 10 times that of current equipment, as it can see farther and darker planets. Video: /watch?v=7SRV3rnULO0
    1
  19237.  @davidleomorley889  My first point is that you clearly lied about posting 8 different links to 8 different videos here in this thread. Nowhere did you ever post any links at all, so why are you continually supporting this blatant lie then? Why not admit to your lie? My second point is that you keep only looking down on China and think that Chinese people are somehow oppressed when you never even set foot in our country and see what life is like here for yourself. Look at you going on and on about democracy and freedom. If you look at history then democracy has a long history of failure and democracy was never popular outside of Greece. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, even Republic of Rome eventually failed. Modern Western democracy only has about 100-200 years of history, and that's not automatically guaranteed to be successful political system. China's current political system has shown to be viable for our country, so is there really a dire need to change? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  19238.  @davidleomorley889  Since its trial operations began in 2016, China's FAST radio telescope has discovered 44 new pulsars, which are a type of solar phenomena in which a rapidly rotating star emits radiation periodically (like some sort of "cosmic lighthouse" if you will) 44 pulsars identified by China's FAST telescope Video: /watch?v=t9nySMjiUzw Now that's an actual contribution to humanity's understanding of the heavens and cosmos. Why are you so concerned about "democracy" in China, when you yourself haven't set foot in China and see what life is like here for yourself? Why continually boast about democracy and proclaim freedom and "having better things to do" (yet you continually return to this thread) You're apparently "walking bag of hypocrisy" you know that?
    1
  19239.  @davidleomorley889  You're lost in your illusionary world of your own, where you posted 8 different links to 8 different videos, when everyone can see here that you posted 0 links so why keep on propagating your lie? Have you signed out of your YouTube account and return to this comment thread? Nowhere did you post any links whatsoever, so why don't you admit to your blatant lie?
    1
  19240.  @davidleomorley889  Pfftt, what open-mindedness and intellectual curiosity do you even exhibit? You yourself admitted that you never actually set foot in China (nor Iraq and Syria for example) and you already believe our countries to be oppressive, without having been there. You're a basically walking bag of hypocrisy and a liar whose living in a delusional world of his own.
    1
  19241.  @davidleomorley889  In 2016, China launched world's 1st quantum satellite, named Micius, (墨子) into orbit and demonstrated that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere, smashing the previous record held on Earth. Video: /watch?v=4QlcKuxDGrs Quantum entanglement (in a nutshell) is when two subatomic particles become an "entangled pair", able to influence their quantum states (won't go into detail here) seemingly regardless of the distance involved. One particle could be on the surface of the Earth, and the other on the surface of the Moon, and theoretically, they can still influence each other with no information (known to current science) passing in between them. The longest record for quantum entanglement on Earth is 143 km in at experiment in the Canary Islands. But China has allowed two stations (Delingha and Lijiang station) located 1200 km apart to communicate directly, through our quantum satellite, thus breaking the previous record and showcasing that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere. And as far as I know, this is a world first, and China is the first to launch quantum satellite into space.
    1
  19242.  @davidleomorley889  You're the blatantly lying about posting 8 different links to 8 different videos. Why don't you answer my question whether you signed out of your YouTube account and returned to this comment thread? You clearly posted 0 links on this comment thread, so why do you continue defending your lie, instead of admitting to your lie?
    1
  19243.  @davidleomorley889  China has even landed on the Moon. In 2013, China landed our very own lunar spacecraft and lunar rover (Chang'e 3 嫦娥-3 and Yutu 玉兔 "Jade Rabbit") on the Moon, making China the world's 3rd nation to make a soft-landing on Earth's celestial neighbor. Source: space(dot)com/23968-china-moon-rover-historic-lunar-landing.html In October 2015, the Jade Rabbit set the record for the longest operational period for a rover on the Moon. The rover's ground penetrating radar found evidence of at least 9 distinct rock layers. Video: /watch?v=XpAwmVPT758 Through this, China is showing that Chinese people are capable of achieving equally impressive feats as Westerners in space.
    1
  19244.  @davidleomorley889  Let's review at your earlier comments, right up to your "I believe the links I provided explain my point of view": 1) @mahmood chaudry Mark Twain: "The radical of one century... 2) @mahmood chaudry Democracy will come to China also... 3) @神州 Shenzhou China is ready to explode because of its oppression... 4) @神州 Shenzhou Your continued obedience and need for validating China's government oppression... 5) @神州 Shenzhou The fact that 90% of the candidates that won... 6) @神州 Shenzhou The United States also has people who will defend the United States... 7) @神州 Shenzhou Every nation has a percentage of its own population that will automatically... 8) 神州 Shenzhou I don't remember commenting on China's successful economic conditions or Western Wars 9) @神州 Shenzhou "Let me ask you, have you actually been to China and see what life is like... 10) @Philip Ting I agree that different countries have different concepts of what freedom is... 11) @神州 Shenzhou I believe the links I provided explain my point and provide evidence for my position. That's all you posted up to that point and nowhere did you post any links whatsoever in those comments, so why did you lied about posting 8 different links to 8 different videos then? Why do you continue defending your lie instead of admitting to your lie?
    1
  19245.  @davidleomorley889  China is 1st country in the world to land on the far side of the Moon. China's Chang'e-4 (嫦娥四号) achieved the first soft landing on the far side of the Moon, on 3 January 2019, using a relay satellite Queqiao (鹊桥 'Bridge of Magpies') Video: /watch?v=JWlxoU5DpLk The Chinese lunar rover Yutu-2 (玉兔二号 'Jade Rabbit 2') explored the Von Kármán crater on the Moon's far side, and even conducted experiments on the Moon such as growing cotton seeds on the Moon (first biological matter to be grown on the Moon) Chinese space mission brings first seeds to life on moon’s surface Video: /watch?v=Zu-G-MncYaw Through this, we are showing that we Chinese people are just as capable as Westerners in space achievements, and that we are also pioneers in space exploration. Why should Chinese people consider ourselves inferior to Westerners? We need to shrug off this misconception, else Chinese (and other Asians) will always be behind Westerners in achievements if our mindsets don't change.
    1
  19246.  @davidleomorley889  You clearly lied, because even thus far you have posted absolutely no links at all, so why are you defending your lie instead of admitting to it? Blocked? I thought you were boasting about your "freedoms" so why would your comments be blocked? You yourself proclaimed to be living in a world of "freedom" so why would there be any blocking? Looks like you're a walking bag of hypocrisy after all. And a liar too boot.
    1
  19247.  @davidleomorley889  I still don't get why you think Chinese people are somehow oppressed. Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. China has world's most outbound tourists Source: nationmultimedia(dot)com/detail/travel/30355861 China is now world's biggest source of international students Source: scmp(dot)com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  19248.  @davidleomorley889  I've scrolled through this comment thread multiple times and you clearly did not post any 8 different comments with 8 different links to 8 different videos. I've even signed out of my 神州 Shenzhou account and return to this comment thread, and still you did not post any 8 different links to 8 different videos like you claimed. That clearly shows that you lied about your links, so why do you continually maintain your lie instead of admitting to your lie. Nowhere in this thread did you ever posted any links like you claimed. And you said "blocked" earlier, but why on Earth would you, living in a world of supposed freedom and democracy, be subjected to being blocked? You're the one continually boasting about freedom and democracy, so "blocking" definitely won't exist in such a world you live in, isn't it? Or are you being a walking bag of hypocrisy right here? I also remember how you preached about having an open mind and intellectual curiosity, yet you haven't even actually set foot in China (or Iraq or Syria) and you already deemed our countries as oppressed without having been to them. You're a walking bag of hypocrisy, not even practicing what you preach at all. And a bare faced liar to boot.
    1
  19249.  @davidleomorley889  China is preparing to launch our very own Mars Lander mission and preparations are underway for its launch in 2020 next year. Recently, we've completed a crucial landing test for our rover. Video: /watch?v=CmQkWnp0t-c The probe will be sent in 2020 with the Long-March 5 Rocket and will take about 7 months to reach the red planet and 7 minutes to land.
    1
  19250.  @davidleomorley889  You clearly lied about posting 8 different links to 8 different videos, so why not come clean about your bald-faced lie, instead of defending your lie? Nowhere did you ever posted any links to any videos here in this thread, so why accuse me of lying when you're the one doing so?
    1
  19251.  @davidleomorley889  What makes you think Chinese are culturally inept? China has 5000 years of history and culture and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. For example, Han Chinese traditional clothing Hanfu (汉服) has 5000 years of history and influenced Japanese Kimono and Korean Hanbok clothing. Today, young people in China are attempting to bring Hanfu back (known as the Hanfu Movement 汉服运动) Video: /watch?v=T6CucJxiWec?t=5 Video: /watch?v=cip9DA1UvHk So what makes you think Chinese people are culturally inept? We are descendents of a proud 5000 year heritage after all.
    1
  19252.  @davidleomorley889  Why don't you come clean about your blatant lie? Nowhere in this thread did you ever posted 8 different comments with different links to 8 different videos, so why continue upholding your lie instead of admitting to your lie? I pointed out that you posted zero links on this thread, yet you accusing me of lying when I pointed out you were lying?
    1
  19253.  @davidleomorley889  Hey, you clearly said that "神州 Shenzhou If China is filled with sad, culturally inept and lying people like yourself", then isn't it clear that you think that "Chinese people are culturally inept"? I merely asked you why do you think that that's all, so why are you accusing me of lying? You clearly believe that China is filled with such people.
    1
  19254.  @davidleomorley889  Did you know that the "Golden Rule", (the foundation for all forms of human morality according to you) actually dates back to early Confucian times (551–479 BC) according to Rushworth Kidder, who identifies that this concept appears prominently in Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Judaism, Taoism, Zoroastrianism, and "the rest of the world's major religions". Source: Wikipedia: Golden Rule
    1
  19255.  @davidleomorley889  Here's a simple solution: Why don't you just sign out of your David Leo Morley YouTube account and then return to this comment thread? Because I've done so many times already and after scrolling many times, nowhere did you ever posted 8 different comments with 8 different links to 8 different videos here in this thread. So why are you labelling me a liar for simply pointing out that you lied about posting links then? And look, you kept on boasting about your freedom and democracy, that your government doesn't block your information, yet earlier you mentioned something about being blocked? Ludicrous! Why would you, living in a world of freedom and democracy, get blocked then? You'll really have to eat your own words then.
    1
  19256.  @davidleomorley889  China also demonstrated the ability to launch rockets from a floating platform in the Yellow Sea, making China the world's 3rd nation to master maritime launch technology, after USA and USSR. China's first satellite launch from floating sea platform sees it rocket ahead in space race Video: /watch?v=AOEJeHJj7kI The Long March 11WEY vehicle carried seven satellites into space. Ocean platforms are more flexible to use and reduce the risk of rocket debris hitting populated areas. Launch services may even be offered to countries that sign up for China's Belt and Road Initiative. Only 3 countries in the world have mastered space rocket launch from floating platforms. You know why I keep on bringing up China's accomplishments? Because China is flourishing under our current political system, so not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. You still think that Chinese people are oppressed, when there are so many Chinese tourists and Chinese international students in other countries.
    1
  19257.  @davidleomorley889  You earlier boasted about your freedoms and democracy, that your government doesn't "block" content, so since it doesn't, that means that this comment thread has not been altered in any way, and you clearly lied about posting 8 different links to 8 different videos. Why don't you come clean with your lie, instead of prolonging the bald-faced lie? You did not post any links whatsoever here in this thread, but instead of admitting to your lie, you start accusing me of lying after I pointed out this fact to you?
    1
  19258.  @davidleomorley889  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: iiipublishing(dot)com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  19259.  @davidleomorley889  You're accusing me of being a government sponsored bot and repeating phrases? Just look at your own words, you keep on repeating your boasts about freedom and democracy, how your government doesn't "block" you, how you are thankful you aren't born in China, how Chinese people are oppressed (even though you admitted that you never actually set foot in China yourself!) So aren't you the one constantly repeating your stale boasts here? And why not come clean with your lie? I've signed out of my account and return to this comment thread to verify your statements and nowhere did you ever posted any links whatsoever, so why not come out of the closet with your lie, instead of accusing me of lying? You clearly did not post any 8 different comments with 8 different links to 8 different videos. Why continue defending your lie?
    1
  19260.  @davidleomorley889  "You can post as many positive things as you want to about China." Will do. The Chinese government is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending and catching up fast to the United States. List of countries by R&D spending 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($451.9 billion) <--- 3. European Union ($379.0 billion) 4. Japan ($165.7 billion) 5. Germany ($118.8 billion) 6. South Korea ($91.6 billion) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by research and development spending In the West, researchers offend have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    1
  19261.  @davidleomorley889  You don't even bother to read my instructions properly. I did not ask you to "sign out and sign in" again (what will that achieve?) I simply requested that you to "sign out and then return to this comment thread" (without signing back in) and view the comment thread. Because nowhere did you ever posted any links whatsoever here in this thread, so why continue maintaining your bold-faced lie that you posted 8 different links to 8 different videos? Why not come clean about your lie? And you're suggesting that my government can block YouTube comments? What a ridiculous thought. I thought you live in a world of freedom and democracy, so how can Chinese government block YouTube comments? Are you afflicted with some mental illness or something?. And you keep on repeating your boasts about living in a free society, so why keep on repeating the same stale point again and again? And you yourself admitted that you never actually set foot in China yourself, yet you already assume that Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese people can be found virtually all over the globe today (we make up 20% of the world's population after all) as Chinese tourists, Chinese international students, and so on.
    1
  19262.  @davidleomorley889  China is home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) and Tianhe-2 (天河-2) and in 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance Source: cnet(dot)com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion). This implies that researchers in China have access to some of the world's most advanced research facilities to conduct their work.
    1
  19263.  @davidleomorley889  Why don't you come clean about your blatant lie that you posted 8 different links to 8 different videos? I've scrolled through this comment thread several times already, even without signing into my 神州 Shenzhou account and you clearly posted 0 links so why keep on defending your lie instead of admitting to it?
    1
  19264.  @davidleomorley889  Chinese scientists also built quantum computing machine that is 24,000 times faster than international counterparts and 10-100 times faster than the first electronic computer, ENIAC. World's First Quantum Computer Made By China Source: fossbytes(dot)com/worlds-first-quantum-computer-made-by-china/ The quantum computer is built by a team of Chinese scientists working at the University of Science and Technology of China, at Hefei in Anhui province. The researchers believe that quantum computing could excel the processing power of supercomputers. Pan Jianwei, a quantum physicist, and an academician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said that quantum computing makes use of quantum superposition principle for ultra-fast parallel calculation and simulation capabilities.
    1
  19265.  @davidleomorley889  I support my claims with actual sources, but you just claimed to have posted 8 different links to 8 different videos? You posted 0 links here in this thread, so why not come clean about your bald faced lie, instead of defending your lie? And you keep on repeating your same old stale boasts about "freedom and democracy" that your government doesn't block you and that Chinese people are oppressed (even when you admitted that you never actually set foot in China) so aren't you the bot just repeating your boasts again and again here?
    1
  19266.  @davidleomorley889  China conducted the world's first 5G remote surgery on test animal. The doctor is located some 50 km away from the operating theater, using robotic arms to operate on a test animal and remove its liver. China completes world’s first 5G remote surgery in test on animal Video: /watch?v=yFR61jjL1vo This is a world first, and no other country has performed remote surgery over a 5G network as China has done so far.
    1
  19267.  @davidleomorley889  Now you are throwing my own words back at me? Who's defending what leader? I merely pointed out that you posted 0 links yet you refuse to admit the truth, instead you even blatantly start lying about posting 8 different links to 8 different videos, when you clearly did not. So why continue lying instead of admitting to your lie? You're the one behaving like a robot, tossing my own words back at me, just because you refuse to admit to your lie.
    1
  19268.  @davidleomorley889  This Chinese doctor performed China's first 5G surgery on human brain on a patient suffering from Parkinson's disease. Doctor performs China's first 5G surgery on human brain Video: /watch?v=qiZrWx51zp0
    1
  19269.  @davidleomorley889  Why don't you admit to your lie about posting 8 different links to 8 different videos? Because you clearly did not post any links whatsoever here in this thread, so why continue maintaining your bold-faced lie?
    1
  19270.  @davidleomorley889  Besides 5G, China had made advancements in Artificial Intelligence systems and we recently unveiled the world's first AI news anchor. World's first AI news anchor debuts in China Video: /watch?v=MHPI1uH9llU Xinhua unveils world's first female AI news anchor Video: /watch?v=5iZuffHPDAw
    1
  19271.  @davidleomorley889  You're just repeating the same old stale point again. If you claim you are free then why don't you admit to your blatant lie about posting 8 different links to 8 different videos? I've revisited this post several times already (even while signed out) and nowhere did you ever posted any links in this thread whatsoever. So why not come clean about your lie, instead of defending it? I'm not "defending any leader" but its you continually defending your lie here. You're always welcome to criticise your own government, but you never seem to do that's all. Instead you keep on claiming that Chinese people are "oppressed" (even when you admitted that you never actually set foot in China) and I have shown that Chinese are virtually everywhere in the world today. For example, located in nearly every major city all over the globe are Chinese ethnic enclaves, where people can gather to appreciate Chinese culture and sample Chinese cuisine. These ethnic enclaves are more commonly known as "Chinatowns" and they are everywhere. No, you don't like China (despite claiming to like China). Because all you done is criticise my country and you're unable to counter my points brought up in defence of my country. You literally ridicule every Chinese accomplishment I brought up, calling it "overcompensating" so why do you proclaim that you like China, when all you done is spit on China's achievements?
    1
  19272.  @davidleomorley889  Besides investing in 5G and AI, China plans on building our very own particle accelerator and collider that will be over 5 times more powerful than the one in Switzerland and over 20 miles in diameter. China Plans to Build a Particle Collider Five Times More Powerful Than the LHC Source: popularmechanics(dot)com/science/a25101820/china-lhc-particle-collider-cepc/ Construction of the collider is expected to begin next year in 2020.
    1
  19273.  @davidleomorley889  You're lying again. What 8 videos two different times and 6 other articles that weren't YouTube related did you posted? Did you sign out of your YouTube account and return to this comment thread (without signing in) to view your alleged links? Because nowhere in this thread did you ever posted any links whatsoever. I've counted 155 comments so this should be the 156th comment and there aren't any missing comments, so it's clear that you are lying again about posting 8 different links and 6 different articles. Ridiculous! What makes you think Chinese government can block YouTube comments through VPN?You would go so far as to blame Chinese government to defend your lie about posting 8 different links and 6 different articles?
    1
  19274.  @davidleomorley889  China recently finished construction of the world's largest airport terminal, _Daxing (大兴) International Airport_in Beijing, in only 4 years of construction! Beijing Daxing International Airport is ready for takeoff Video: /watch?v=OzYM5dMU1YM China’s newly-built Beijing Daxing International Airport officially put into operation Video: /watch?v=-vnhgPHVdrw Whereas didn't President Trump promise to build a wall at the US-Mexico border? It's approaching the end of his first presidential term of 4 years and has the foundations for his wall been laid down yet?
    1
  19275. 中非有着相似的历史遭遇，在争取民族解放的斗争中始终相互同情、相互支持，结下了深厚的友谊。中非之间的经济关系是建立在平等互利、互利共赢的基础上的，中非之间的文化关系是建立在相互尊重、相互借鉴的基础上的。
    1
  19276. NATO the Hare is rushing to slap as many sanctions on Russia as they can, while pouring lethal aid into Ukraine, until they've exhausted their sanction options and run low on weapons to send before the finish line. Whereas Russia the Tortoise is making slow but steady progress towards the finish line.
    1
  19277. Ionor Rea's Tech Evolution Archive said "I do not see any improvement from China taking over when seeing how they treat own citizens and what kind of relationship China had with countries around" Chinese government have stated publicly that our government system is not for export to other countries. China is not interested in spreading "communism" like Soviet Union in the past, or like what USA is doing with democracy. China observes a policy of non-interference in other countries affairs, and will do business with countries as long as they are willing to do business with us. President Xi says China will not export its political system Source: reuters (dot) com/article/us-china-parties/president-xi-says-china-will-not-export-its-political-system-idUSKBN1DV4UM China is helping build infrastructure in countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Maldives, and also African countries like Nigeria, Angola, Kenya, etc. But China is not exporting "communism" to these countries, and merely doing business that's all.
    1
  19278.  @CohnAlex  Even the United States separates parents from kids by deporting more than half a million parents who were illegal immigrants since 2009 according to Washington Post. Source: washingtonpost com/news/wonk/wp/2015/09/21/this-is-what-would-happen-to-the-children-of-11-million-illegal-immigrants-if-president-trump-deported-them/
    1
  19279.  @stoggafllik  Who said that you can't carry a Winnie the Pooh bag while in China? If you shop online on Chinese website Taobao and enter a search entry for Winnie the Pooh (小熊维尼), there are a wide variety of Winnie the Pooh products available for purchase in China. Here's the search results for Winnie the Pooh (小熊维尼) on taobao.com/list/product/%E5%B0%8F%E7%86%8A%E7%BB%B4%E5%B0%BCwinniethepooh.htm
    1
  19280. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19281. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  19282. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19283. Even the United States recognizes that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19284. Even the U.S acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19285. Countries all over the globe acknowledge the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19286. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  19287. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  19288. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19289. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19290. Huawei and soon to be, Tiktok
    1
  19291. +Dan Neutron Actually, during Yuan dynasty China, it was Mongolian leader Kublai Khan that choose to abandon his culture and embrace Chinese culture, proclaiming himself emperor of Yuan Dynasty China. During Yuan dynasty, Mongolia (both Inner and Outer) were incorporated into China. The same thing happened in Qing dynasty, when Manchu leaders proclaim themselves emperors of Qing Dynasty China, and incorporated Manchuria into China. Han Chinese had little to do with the incorporation of Mongolia and Manchuria into China. Lastly, Tibet was incorporated into China in Yuan dynasty too, when Mongolians conquered Tibet and made it part of Yuan dynasty China. Around this time, Xinjiang was also conquered and incorporated by Mongolians. If you think Chinese "stole" technology, then what about your countries making use of Chinese inventions like paper, printing, compass and gunpowder? Chinese people also invented the crossbow which was used by Europeans in medieval ages. China does not fault your countries for using our technologies, so why are you claiming we stole Western "technology"?
    1
  19292. +Dan Neutron Kublai Khan called his empire "Yuan dynasty China" not "Mongolian Empire" so it was clear that he had embraced Chinese culture and abandoned his own. During his reign, Mongolians were nomadic tribesmen and know nothing about growing food, so Chinese farmers feed the empire. Mongols know nothing of running an empire as large as China, so Chinese bureaucrats took over the daily affairs. Thus, Yuan dynasty is as much Chinese civilization as it is part of China. According to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qing_dynasty "The Manchus identified their state as "China" (中國, Zhōngguó; "Middle Kingdom"), and the emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, Tibet and other areas) as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that "China" only meant Han areas. The first compasses were made of lodestone, a naturally magnetized ore of iron, in Han dynasty China between 300 and 200 BC. The earliest chemical formula for gunpowder appeared in the 11th century Song dynasty text, Wujing Zongyao. Han Chinese have always lived in the lands constituting China today. Besides China is multi-ethnic, and not just Han Chinese only. Tibetans, Ugyghurs, Mongolians and Manchu people living in China are some of China's 50+ recognized ethnic groups. Crossbows were in use in China since Qin dynasty. We know this because we have found bronze crossbow triggers in Qin Emperor's tomb, when the other parts like wood and string have long since rotted away. If you come to Xi'An to visit the tombs, you can find them on display. Even if modern paper is exactly the same as in ancient China, paper's use in China is what laid the foundation for paper's widespread use today. Papyrus and other materials had died out due to competition with Chinese paper. Also Chinese invented paper banknote so that people today don't have to carry around precious metals as currency, which revolutionized trade.
    1
  19293. +Dan Neutron According to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qing_dynasty#Names -After conquering "China proper", the Manchus identified their state as "China" (中國, Zhōngguó; "Middle Kingdom"), and the emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, Tibet and other areas) as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that "China" only meant Han areas. -The Qing emperors proclaimed that both Han and non-Han peoples were part of "China". They used both "China" and "Qing" to refer to their state in official documents, international treaties and foreign affairs, and "Chinese people" (中國之人 Zhōngguó zhī rén) referred to all subjects of the empire. -In the Chinese-language versions of its treaties and its maps of the world, the Qing government used "Qing" and "China" interchangeably. So what makes you think China is only consists of Han Chinese only? China has over 50 recognized ethnic groups, including Manchu, Mongols, Uyghur and Tibetan. You know how USA has Caucasian Americans (White), African Americans (Black), Latin Americans (Brown), Asian Americans (Yellow) and of course, Native Americans (Red)? Its the same thing with China here.
    1
  19294. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  19295. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19296. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  19297. 说真的翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19298. 说真的翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  19299. 说真的翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19300. 翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19301. Armaan Tyagi China is 3rd nation in the world to demonstrate anti-satellite capabilities in 2007 by taking out a 750 kg satellite in orbit at altitude of 865 km, with a missile launched from the ground. Thus Chinese military can theoretically take out the Indian satellite surveillance over the Indian Ocean 24/7 and the Indian ground troops will be put at a disadvantage without satellite communication and support.
    1
  19302.  @myhome2455  I'm willing to bet that even if you show those two hosts a Map of China, they'll be unable to point out the Xinjiang province or Shenzhen city that they're talking about.
    1
  19303.  @sinscope00  Agreed. They should at least have invited Chinese nationals to the talkshow if they want to talk about China.
    1
  19304.  BlackManTravel  "Let me guess you're Chinese" Is there something wrong with being Chinese?
    1
  19305. 虽然他离开中国多年，他仍然能保持这么好的普通话流利水平，真的很不错哦。
    1
  19306.  @martinrobillard1  Is Western MSM telling the truth by deliberately blurring the Red Eagle Symbol at 5:10 of the video?
    1
  19307.  @Bitchslapper316  "The atrocities carried out by the German Nazi's didn't come to light until the later years of the war..." Likewise, it's possible that the atrocities committed by Ukrainian neo-Nazis won't come to light until long after this Russo-Ukraine conflict has reached its conclusion, of which most likely is a Russian victory, as long as NATO does not militarily intervene. Also, it doesn't change the fact that the Allies used Nazism as a legitimate excuse to justify their war with Germany during WWII, then can't Russia do the same for Ukraine? "Nato expansion is another lie from the bag of excuses" NATO has literally expanded into 13 countries. NATO was initially formed in response to rising Soviet military might, but after the USSR dissolution in 1991, NATO no longer serves any interests, except perhaps the U.S interests in maintaining their hegemonic rule. About Putin's quote, that's because at one point in time, Russia actually wanted to join NATO and help defend Europe from external threats. But NATO just snubbed Russia's entry, then for what purpose does NATO serve, except the U.S interests? The ironic thing is that a country from across the Pacific Ocean (i.e USA) can join NATO, yet Europe's largest country, Russia is excluded from joining NATO? "Some potential reasons for the invasion? 1) Vast oil and gas reserves were found in the Donbas regions." Russia already has more gas and oil than they even know what to do with. For what reason would Russia want more oil? "2) Land route across Ukraine to and from Europe and the black sea where most of the Russian imports and exports go." Crimea is already part of Russia since the 2014 referendum, granting Russia to access the Black Sea through Sevastopol. "3) Armament of Ukraine and hitting them while they still can. They don't want a neighbor that can stand up to them." Ukraine cannot stand up to Russia even before this conflict began. I mean, Ukrainian army is using Soviet-era weaponry, whereas Russia's Army manufactures its own weapons. But Ukraine has been steadily receiving NATO weapons (despite Ukraine not being a NATO member) all this time, so there's some credence to Putin wanting reassurances that Ukraine would not be allowed to join NATO. "4) The largest amount of fertile farming land on the entire Asian continent." Russia is the world's largest exporter of wheat, for what reason does Russia need more fertile farming land in Ukraine? "5) The largest supply of rare earth minerals in Europe." Russia is the largest country in the world by land area, they have more land than what they even know to do with. Doesn't it make more sense to harness Russia's own untapped resources, rather than have a military intervention in Ukraine for rare earth minerals? ... All in all, your 5 reasons don't seem to justify Russia's need for a special military operation in Ukraine. However, Nazism still leaves an impact on Russians (the Soviet Union lost the most people during WWII against the Nazis) so it's in Russia's security interests that Ukraine doesn't become a breeding ground for fascism. "No one wants to spend their tax dollars and blood so the companies owned by Putin and the oligarchs can make a fortune..." Excuse me but which Russian oligarch has made a fortune over this military operation? NATO sanctions are targeting Russian oligarchs and seizing their property, their yachts, banning their football clubs, etc, what fortune are the Russian oligarchs making? Over $300 billion in Russian foreign reserves have been seized by the West, and Western corporations like McDonald's, Facebook, etc, are pulling out of Russia, how is this making money for those rich Russians?
    1
  19308.  @xiaomose7495  The world needs to be freed from the U.S tyranny, so that countries can sanction the true cause of the Ukraine problem, the U.S.
    1
  19309. If those DPP separatists want to declare independence, then they should get off the Chinese territory of Taiwan and find some other plot of land to claim for themselves. Because Taiwan is an in alianable part of China.
    1
  19310.  @AIBOT-TIFFANY  A gift from Biden? Didn't you know it was the 2020 Trump administration that signed the deal to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan in the first place, and that it was left to the Biden administration to carry out the withdrawal? So typical to blame the previous administration and think the new administration will be any different.
    1
  19311. ​ @AIBOT-TIFFANY A gift from Biden? Didn't you know it was the 2020 Trump administration that signed the deal to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan in the first place? And you think this same administration is somehow going to turn out different from previous administrations?
    1
  19312.  @AIBOT-TIFFANY  A gift from biden? Wasn't it the 2020 Trump administration that signed the US withdrawal deal from Afghanistan?
    1
  19313. ​ @AIBOT-TIFFANY A gift from biden? Wasn't it the 2020 Trump administration that signed the US withdrawal deal from Afghanistan?
    1
  19314.  @plendafuture7451  You said: "神州 Shenzhou we do not live in a world where conflict is the west should be settled only by the west." So are you inviting the East to settle conflicts in the West then? Yet the Western MSM portray it as "communist" infiltration to their audiences, whenever China makes deals with other countries.
    1
  19315.  @kckoay6211  "The problem lies not with the average Americans, but the highly divided and dysfunctional political power within Washington Beltway." But aren't the average Americans (majority of them anyway) responsible for electing their politicians into power? If it weren't for the Americans voting, then their politicians wouldn't have been able to come into power.
    1
  19316.  @MarkYeung1  But Meng Wanzhou did not violate Canadian laws while in Canada, why was Meng arrested for 3 years then?
    1
  19317.  @enzoh7763  Since there are elections in America, then aren't American citizens themselves (majority of them anyway) responsible for their politicians coming to power? Isn't that how "democracy" works in the United States, where the citizens elect there own politicians?
    1
  19318. My mistake, turns out that the latest news is that Spavors and Korvig have been released and are on their way back to Canada.
    1
  19319.  @enzoh7763  Does that mean that the Americans themselves (majority of them anyway) are responsible for electing their politicians into power? Their casted votes were what got their politicians into power?
    1
  19320.  @MarkYeung1  But Meng did not violate any Canadian laws while in Canada, so again, why was Meng Wanzhou arrested by Canadian border police in the first place?
    1
  19321.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "There's zero evidence that the Michaels commited any crime." Michael Spavor took photos and videos of Chinese military equipment on multiple occasions. These photos were subsequently sent illegally to various people outside of China, including Kovrig. Between 2017 and 2018, Kovrig entered China under the guise of a businessman and false pretext of commerce. Using this false identity, Kovrig gathered a large amount of information related to China’s national security, and wrote analytical reports to be sent to the International Crisis Group. Contrary to popular belief, the ICG is not authorized to work in China as a legitimate NGO.
    1
  19322.  @mechinizer6911  "we've been sick of Chinese products for years" Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, toys, clothing, sneakers, etc, so that inflation in America kept to a minimum and the cost of living is lower than it should be. Think of the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursuits like cars, luxury brands, housing, etc.
    1
  19323.  @mechinizer6911  Also consider this question: Are American workers willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers? If not, then prices of Made in America goods would be higher than Made in China goods. Just like your example with US rare earths, Americans won't be able to produce rare earth at the same competitive prices as China. So companies will find it increasingly expensive and difficult to operate with the high costs of US rare earths, and China will still be a more attractive option because of our affordable rare earths.
    1
  19324. The US is doing to Tik Tok what they did to Huawei; just because they are successful Chinese companies.
    1
  19325. Many Chinese have been overseas as tourists and students, so it can be said that Chinese more about the West, than the West know about China.
    1
  19326.  @xaxfixho  Who is the CPP? I've never heard of such an organization.
    1
  19327. Personally, I think a two-party system is not a good system. The two parties will tend oppose each other instead of fighting for the good of the country (like what US political parties are doing now). China has succeeded quite well under single party authoritarian CCP rule, and even Taiwan been ruled for nearly its entire life by authoritarian single-party KMT rule. Only in 2016 (2 years ago) was Taiwan finally ruled by political party (DPP) that is not KMT, and ever since then, Taiwan's relations with China have suffered an all time low.
    1
  19328. 我用VPN关着评论有什么事？谁说我住在国外呢？在中国里用VPN都不是犯法，所以为什么我不能用VPN？犯了什么法？ “民主是人类本能的渴望” 中国有五千年历史，在哪个时代有民主呢？中国没有民主还能活着，所以这代表什么呢？中国需要民主吗？
    1
  19329. 我同意你说中国需要全世界的人才，但这不是自由民主的理由啊。你看，中国没有民主，但西方公司还在中国投资，所以为什么你以为中国需要民主才能发展呢？
    1
  19330. 你去看全世界最大的互联网公司列表，虽然中国还不是第一，但是中国已经追上了美国很多，可以说中国是第二名。腾讯、阿里巴巴和百度，已经变成中国大名牌了，所以为什么中国需要自由民主呢？ 最大的互联网公司列表 zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/最大的互联网公司列表 English: List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies
    1
  19331. 叫我去看创新排名吗？好啊，没问题。世界知识产权组织和美国康奈尔大学等机构在纽约发布“2018年全球创新指数报告”。根据全球創新指數，中国较去年上升5名，居第17，首次进入前20名。 全球創新指數 Global Innovative Index Source: globalinnovationindex.org/analysis-indicator 2015年，中国排名第29位。(China was ranked 29 in 2015) 2016年，中国排名第25位。(China was ranked 25 in 2016) 2017年，中国排名第22位。(China was ranked 22 in 2017) 2018年，中国排名第17位。(China was ranked 17 in 2018) 每一年，中国慢慢的上升，所以这掉膘什么呢？中国不需要自由民主吗？ 到2020年，中国应该排名前15位 (By 2020, China should be Top 15) 到2030年，中国应该排名前10位 (By 2030, China should be Top 10)
    1
  19332. 你整天问很多问题，我给你我的答案，你都不听。所以为什么我还要继续回答你问题呢？你也能在网络找答案，为啥你不做自己的功课呢？你在这评论里贡献了什么？ 在评论里我问过你 “中国有五千年历史，在哪个时代有民主呢？” 你也还没有回答我。
    1
  19333. 你说过很多美国的先进研究，是由（一代）华人科学家做出的。虽然这些人在美国工作，但是一方面他们在中国人圈子活跃，从而带动中国科研发展，另一方面，随着中国的发展和美国华人的生存环境持续恶化，越来越多的人会选择回国（美国华人面临左派种族配额政策和右派排外主义两方面的压迫）。另外华人在美国公司遇到玻璃天花板，也是很多高端人才回国的原因。
    1
  19334. 截至2017年12月 ， 中国拥有最大的高速公路合法轻型插件库存，拥有超过120万辆国产乘用车。中国在插电式电动公交车部署方面也占据主导地位，2016年全球库存量达到343,500辆，约为345,000辆。 Source: Electric car use by country wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_car_use_by_country
    1
  19335. 难道电子车不是高科技创新吗？你根本不把我放在眼里，那我怎么办呢？你要的是高科技创新吗？“神威太湖之光”是中国开发的超级计算机，也取代“天河二号”成为世界上最快的超级计算机。 “神威太湖之光”成为全球最快超算 xinhuanet.com/tech/zt1300.htm China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ 你整天说中国人才的问题，但中国还能与美国竞争，所以有什么大问题呢？ 你整天说人才的问题，但中国还能
    1
  19336. 使用中国VPN并不昂贵，而且在中国的生活成本非常便宜。 如果你住在美国，生活费用高于中国，对不对？ 无论你住在哪个国家，都有自己的开支。
    1
  19337. 五百米口径望远镜让中国射电天文领跑世界—新闻—科学网 Source:http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2015/2/313829.shtm 英文 China Finishes Building World's Largest Radio Telescope space.com/33357-china-largest-radio-telescope-alien-life.html 所以为什么你还说我国本身科技就落后于别人？
    1
  19338. 我就跟你说了，VPN是买一次，就不用花钱了，就能上Facebook，和YT。但你根本不放我在眼里，继续不听我的话。
    1
  19339. 截至2015年，中国是世界上访问量第四大的国家，仅次于法国，美国和西班牙，每年有5690万国际游客。 China ranks 4th in the world as a tourist destination en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings 那你还说人家宁可去台湾也不想来大陆。
    1
  19340. 谁管的了西方的话？西方媒体对中国很傲慢与偏见，他们希望中国变得更像西方，他们对中国的进步不感兴趣，继续支持台湾将减缓中国的增长。除了中国人，没有人关心中国。除了中国人，没人能保护中国。那些台湾人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19341. 你听中国最近量子计算机新闻吗？量子计算机是一类遵循量子力学规律进行高速数学和逻辑运算、存储及处理量子信息的物理装置。 华媒："中国造"光量子计算机问世 实现10个超导量子比特纠缠 sputniknews.cn/china/201705061022579468/ China hits milestone in developing quantum computer ‘to eclipse all others’ scmp.com/news/china/policies-politics/article/2092635/china-hits-milestone-developing-quantum-computer
    1
  19342. 你整天说吸引人才的事，但你又什么证据呢？一点证据都没有，那些人才为了美国发表了什么？中国大部分用中国的人才，还能科学突破，那那些美国人才到底在做什么呀？说来听听吧。。。
    1
  19343. 有听过中国的中国商飞C919？ C919是由中国商用飞机有限责任公司研制的线客机，为了与波音737MAX和空中巴士A320－neo竞争。其使用了与下一代波音737MAX和空中巴士A320 neo相同的CFM International LEAP-1C引擎，将比目前波音737和空中巴士A320节省15%的燃料使用。除此之外减碳排放量50%，载客数多8到10人，且座位空间更宽敞，可以与对手开发中的下一代飞机媲美，预期这款产品有竞争力的部分主要是瞄准在经济与舒适性。 中国商飞C919 zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/中國商飛C919 COMAC C919 - Chinese narrow-body twinjet airliner. History and future of the aircraft youtube.com/watch?v=axZ7YTZgcHg
    1
  19344. 我早就说了： 全球創新指數 Global Innovative Index Source: globalinnovationindex.org/analysis-indicator 2015年，中国排名第29位。(China was ranked 29 in 2015) 2016年，中国排名第25位。(China was ranked 25 in 2016) 2017年，中国排名第22位。(China was ranked 22 in 2017) 2018年，中国排名第17位。(China was ranked 17 in 2018) 每一年，中国慢慢的上升。 到2020年，中国应该排名前15位 (By 2020, China should be Top 15) 到2030年，中国应该排名前10位 (By 2030, China should be Top 10) 但你根本不把我说的话放在眼里，还敢骂我汉奸。
    1
  19345. 你说中国偷点技术，但证据呢？ 而且那些美国人才到底为了美国做了什么？
    1
  19346. 量子科学实验卫星“墨子号”，是中国的一颗人造地球卫星。2016年8月16日1时40分，卫星于酒泉卫星发射中心搭载长征二号丁运载火箭发射升空，成为全球首颗设计用于进行量子科学实验的卫星。 2017年6月16日，墨子号首先成功实现，两个量子纠缠光子被分发到相距超过1200公里的距离后，仍可继续保持其量子纠缠的状态。 量子科学实验卫星 zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/量子科学实验卫星 China's Quantum Satellite Micus youtube.com/watch?v=4QlcKuxDGrs 你上面说光纤，但光纤本身存在损耗，而且会导致纠缠品质下降；而近地面自由空间通信又受到天气、障碍物和地面曲率的影响；因而广域光量子传输转向采用卫星中转的方式。中国在2012年成功实现了世界上最远距离的量子态隐形传输。
    1
  19347. 人才。。。人才。。。人才。。。人才。。。人才。。。人才。。。人才。。。人才。。。人才。。。人才。。。 整天说同样的话，但这些人才到底为了美国做了什么呀？ 每年大量尖端人才流失到海外，所以说他们是正真的汉奸吗？ 美国最近有什么科学突破？我还在等你的回答哦！
    1
  19348. 看来你已经叫特朗普爹了。特朗普对待你就像一个儿子吗？或一只狗？ 最近美国有没有人欢迎中国人才，把你们当成自己的国人吗？ 还是美国人叫你滚回中国 (Go Back to China!) 美国人根本不把你们华人才当成自己的国家人，所以为什么你还替他们说话？
    1
  19349. 中国当然会欢迎那些科学家啊，你为什么以为中国不欢迎他们？中国有什么理由拒绝美国人才们？
    1
  19350. 中国是第一个在海军舰船上安磁軌砲的国家，连美国多年的研究还不能把他们的磁軌砲上安在海军舰船。 Looks like China just installed a railgun on a warship, beating the U.S. Navy to the punch popsci.com/china-navy-railgun-warship
    1
  19351. 你上面说：“美国科学家80%是外来移民，其中也包括华人” 所以剩下20％科学家是美国人才。这20％美国科学家对外国人才有什么感觉呢？他们有觉得自己人输给了外国人吗？你看哈佛歧视亚裔被起诉。 哈佛歧视亚裔被起诉 美司法部 Harvard sued for alleged discrimination against Asian American applicants theguardian.com/education/2018/jun/15/harvard-sued-discrimination-against-asian-americans 因此美国欢迎人才其实是错觉。在表面上是欢迎，但在心里他们根本不把外国人才当成自己人。他们认为白人人口正在减少。 慢慢被穆斯林、拉丁美洲人和亚洲人取代。那中国为啥要像美国一样呢？我们有自己的人才，虽然漏了一点但很多还在留下来，为我国创造更美好的未来。
    1
  19352. 诺贝尔奖有什么用？全部由西方控制。你说美国很了不起，那为什么你不说几个例子来听听？既然有很多例子，为什么不说几个？你说我是井底之蛙，那你有没有张开眼睛吗？你说中国继续做梦，那你这种人到底为中国做了什么？我觉得你才是正真的汉奸，跑去外国整天喷中国。中国不需要你这种的美分狗。
    1
  19353. China is opening a new quantum research supercenter popsci.com/chinas-launches-new-quantum-research-supercenter
    1
  19354. 美国的人才80%是从外国来的，那剩下20%人才到底为了美国做什么呢？自己人没有成功，而且听到外国人才成功，心里很难受，觉得太丢脸，所以慢慢的经变得排外了。如果你真的住在美国，你有没有感受白人的种族主义、傲慢与偏见吗？
    1
  19355. 但中国的成功大部分都由中国人的努力，他们的成功都是我国的成功，是中国的骄傲。 Chinese Scientists Make Breakthrough in Quantum Computing Technology youtube.com/watch?v=SG5b14jIUdU&
    1
  19356. 你根本不知道美国政府的思维方式，如果我是清华博士毕业，来到美国做工，美国人会怀疑我是中国间谍。这不是开玩笑哦！美国有移民危机“immigration crisis"，他们对移民产生了怀疑，特别是中国人。所以为什么你还以为美国会欢迎你来呢？你不要只是看外表而已，看美国人里面的心，就知道美国人根本不把你当自己人。你有看过哈佛大学对待亚裔美国人吗？那不是共产主义宣传哦。我能读英文和中文，所以我能听双方的媒体，能做出我自己的决定，所以为啥还说我被洗脑了呢？
    1
  19357. 又提到VPN的事。开关VPN都是小事，你为什么还继续说不方便的是呢？你没有其他的事喷了啊？
    1
  19358. 你说中国外国人才比美国少，那为什么中国还能在某些方面超过美国呢？如果人才永远会想去更好的地方生活，那比如说中国未来的生活比美国好一点，美国的80%外国科学家会来到中国，剩下的20%美国科学家会发生什么？你必须要留下自己人的人才，不然全都飞走了。
    1
  19359. China’s Tsinghua University linked to cyber espionage, study claims ft.com/content/cbf22f3c-a1f9-11e8-85da-eeb7a9ce36e4 China’s Tsinghua University Found to Have Cyber-Spied for Regime’s Trade Interests, Belt and Road theepochtimes.com/chinas-tsinghua-university-found-to-have-cyber-spied-for-regimes-trade-interests-belt-and-road_2627779.html 如果美国人听到这事，你觉得他们有什么反应呢？他们已经对移民人非常可疑，尤其是中国人，所以你为什么还替他们说话呢？
    1
  19360. Westerners also made use of Chinese military technology in the past like crossbows and especially gunpowder. Even the concept of a rocket was first developed in ancient China. But do you see Chinese people complaining about Westerners using our military innovations?
    1
  19361. "no one is complaining." then why are you even making such a post at all? The Chinese Dream is the eventual rejuvenation of our great nation, so why do you claim it doesn't exist?
    1
  19362.  @Madame702  On 10 March, Iran and Saudi Arabia signed an agreement, brokered by China, declaring their intention to end a hugely destructive rivalry that has stretched over decades and fuelled conflicts across the Middle East. How is this not a sign of peace? Because I'm Chinese you're calling me naive?
    1
  19363.  @Madame702  Iran has agreed to stop arming the Houthis and Saudi Arabia is committed to pushing for less disparaging coverage of Iran by its media.
    1
  19364. Video: China-made exoskeleton robot gives hope to paraplegics youtu.be/3_o8nthlIIA
    1
  19365. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19366. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19367. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  19368. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19369. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19370. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19371. Even the United States recognizes that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19372. Even the USA acknowledges the One China policy that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19373. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19374. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  19375. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19376. The term "East Turkestan" is a fake name coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists (including Nikita Bichurin) who intended the name to replace the common Western term for the region, Chinese Turkestan. There was never historically such a country, it was just renaming of a Chinese region.
    1
  19377. Better for the government to control the army. Otherwise the army may attempt a coup, just like in Thailand for example
    1
  19378.  @sara.cbc92  How is Taiwan better than the mainland? Mainland China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    1
  19379.  @sara.cbc92  Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Taiwan to compare with the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  19380.  @sara.cbc92  Chinese celebrate many historical festivals such as Spring Festival (Chinese New Year), Lantern Festival, Qingming (Grave Sweeping) Festival, Dragonboat Festival, Double Seventh (Chinese Valentines Day) Festival, Mid-autumn Festival, and so on. Here's some video of Chinese festivals in China. Video: Dragon Boat Races Celebrate China's Ancient Past | National Geographic youtu.be/YlPExNPyPwQ Video: Lantern Festival celebrated across China youtu.be/XnXzQ-p-DpY China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  19381. Russians refer to WW2 as the Great Patriotic War.
    1
  19382. Chinese government rushed to built a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised. Video: Huoshenshan: the hospital built in 10 days in China over coronavirus outbreak youtu.be/l2QfufpwfdY Kudos to the Chinese construction workers who worked hard to build those hospitals. China also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. Video: Time-lapse video shows how Leishenshan hospital completed in 12 days youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk
    1
  19383.  @carlosmorris4510  "神州 Shenzhou hospitals... Or concentration camps?" While we built thousand bed hospitals in days, you anti-China people deliberately mislabelling them as "containers". Yet here USA is erecting "tentages" to treat the infected.
    1
  19384.  @TheToxicity  A Chinese Vaccine has been approved for human testing at virus epicentre. Source: Chinese vaccine approved for human testing at virus epicentre straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/chinese-vaccine-approved-for-human-testing-at-virus-epicentre
    1
  19385.  @OWO-oj7dw  "using of VPN to access such platforms is actually illegal in China," Who said that using a VPN in China is illegal? Which person in China has been arrested just for using a VPN? There are hotels in China which offer VPN services to foreign tourists that require access to western websites. Even college students in university have free access to the university VPN in order to conduct their research.
    1
  19386.  @OWO-oj7dw  Who said that using a VPN in China is illegal? Which person in China has been arrested just for using a VPN? In China there are hotels which offer VPN services to foreign tourists that require access their apps. Even college students in university have free access to the university VPN in order to conduct research.
    1
  19387.  @OWO-oj7dw  Who said that using a VPN in China is illegal? There are hotels In China which offer VPN services to foreign tourists in order to access their apps. Even college students in university have free access to the university VPN in order to conduct research.
    1
  19388.  @pr0newbie  Chinese Confucian culture teaches us to value our elderly folk in society, even if it comes at the cost of the economy. Loss of income and money is tragic yes, but money lost can still be earned again in the future. However, once the elderly lose their lives, no amount of money can buy back lives that have been lost.
    1
  19389.  @pr0newbie  Confucianism in China had existed since 551 BC. Confucianism had survived the Qin Emperor's attempt to wipe it out, and they have been guiding Chinese society for thousands of years, far earlier than the 18th and 19th century. And the elderly suffering while the economy is bad, is better than the elderly dying while the economy is good, that's simply not the Chinese way to allow our elderly to perish when it can be avoided. As for vaccination, some elderly people have medical conditions that prevent them from getting vaccinated.
    1
  19390.  @pr0newbie  You said that the Confucian respect for elders served the elite's interests, but there are poor elder people too, so how does Confucian virtues serve those poor elderly people? The fact remains that Confucian principles have been guiding China for thousands of years prior to the 18th and 19th century. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled.
    1
  19391. +Trel carbyx Which part of my news is fake? The Philippines vessel that crashed onto Chinese islands was USS Harnett County (LST-821) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Harnett_County_(LST-821) and the Philippine Navy intentionally ran her aground on the Ayungin Shoal in order to maintain the Philippine's territorial claim in the area. Why does Philippines have to resort to such dirty tactics in order to enforce its claims then? The court that ruled over decision regarding the islands was not a court "in the traditional sense." There was overwhelming majority of countries supporting China's stance. About 70 countries expressed support for China's position compared to 8-10 countries supporting Philippines stance. From this source below, you can already see more countries supporting China's stance than Philippines's. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippines_v._China#Before_the_ruling
    1
  19392. +Trel carbyx Firstly, that tribunal (Permanent Court of Arbitration) is not even official UN agency, like International Court of Justice, Since the case was not conducted by official UN agency like ICJ, China reserves the right not to adhere to its jurisdiction, regarding issues like territorial sovereignty. United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1989486/united-nations-stresses-separation-hague-tribunal Furthermore, China made declaration in accordance with the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea in 2006 not to accept any of the procedures regarding territorial sovereignty. Many countries including the United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, France, Canada, and Spain made similar declarations to reject any of the procedures regarding determining national sovereignty.
    1
  19393. +Trel carbyx One of the tribunal's laws is that both sides must be consenting parties to its jurisdiction, in order for the judgement to be legally binding. Since China did not agree to settle this dispute through third party jurisdiction (i.e. China did not consent to settle this by court) they why is this tribunal's jurisdiction even acceptable now? Its basic requirements have not been met, so how is its final decision even valid?
    1
  19394. +Trel carbyx The tribunal's fundamental requirement of requiring both parties to consent to submit to its ruling has not been met, so how does the tribunal's ruling hold any power at all? It's not even an official UN agency like ICJ, so China reserves the right not to recognise its ruling.
    1
  19395. China has 5000 years of history and is one of the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations, like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has literally thousands of years of political literature to draw experience from to help guide our leaders,
    1
  19396. Even though Georgian Dream was declared the winner, Georgia's President (who was born in France) has annouced that she would not recognize the results and that she will not be stepping down. And she says she's doing it all in the name of "democracy."
    1
  19397.  @junebug8485  You said: _ "They arent widespread, I could ask anyone here in the west if they own a "Huawei phone" and barely anyone will."_ You think the West makes up the entire world? The West only makes up 14% of the entire world's population, compared to the other 86% that make up the rest of the world.
    1
  19398.  @junebug8485  You said: "They arent widespread, I could ask anyone here in the west if they own a "Huawei phone" and barely anyone will." The West only makes up 14% of the entire world's population, you think Huawei phones aren't widespread in the majority 86% of the world's population?
    1
  19399.  @junebug8485  Everyone that does uses drones has heard of Chinese company DJI, they are the global leader in manufacturing innovative drone and camera technology for commercial and recreational use.
    1
  19400.  @junebug8485  You said: "Im not in denial I just dont see any Chinese stores around me." Because you live in the West, which only represents 14% of the entire world's population, how can you claim to speak on behalf the world? What about the other 86% of the world's population that are non-Western?
    1
  19401.  @msimon6808  Japan, Germany, Singapore are countries with aging populations and yet they haven't collapsed so what makes you think China will?
    1
  19402.  @junebug8485  Since you admitted that the West makes up only 14% of the world's entire population, then you cannot claim China's companies aren't widespread in the other 86% of the world. You mentioned Japan and South Korea, did you know that China is their biggest trading partner, with 22% for Japan and 25% for South Korea, compared with the U.S being only 18% of Japan and 14% for South Korea.
    1
  19403.  @junebug8485  You said: "Tell me why there's Chinese slaving off for western companies but not the other way around? Lack of influence is why." What are you talking about? There are thousands of Chinese companies that employ Westerners and other foreigners., for example Huawei (194,000 foreigner employees), Tencent (62,000 foreigner employees), Bytedance (60,000 foreigner employees), CGTN (5,000 foreigner employees) and so on.
    1
  19404.  @junebug8485  "神州 Shenzhou You misinterpreted what I said." This is what you wrote: "They arent widespread, I could ask anyone here in the west if they own a "Huawei phone" and barely anyone will." but since the West makes up only 14% of the world's population, you can't claim Chinese companies aren't widespread in the other 86% of the world. How did I misinterpret it? Later you also said: "Im not in denial I just dont see any Chinese stores around me." which also reinforces my point. Such hubris coming from you to claim Chinese companies aren't widespread just because you don't see them in the West. The West does not represent the entire world.
    1
  19405.  @junebug8485  You said: "Culturally, China has nothing that can compare to western culture you can't deny that." China has 5,000 years of history and culture, and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt eventually crumbled. Throughout our long history, China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and falls of numerous empires, and yet China has survived the oftentimes violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact. How is that incomparable to Western culture?
    1
  19406.  @junebug8485  According to 7 Companies Hiring Foreigners in China, there are tons of companies hiring foreigners in China, from mobile phone manufacturers and social media giants to famous international ad agencies and language centers. In Huawei, a whole host of foreigners work on the campus in roles as diverse as copywriting, translating, PR and sales. Another thing is that Huawei has about 200,000 employees worldwide, and about 2,400 in Germany, according to the company, so it's apparent that Chinese companies are hiring Westerners. As for Apple hiring Chinese workers, it's a given that when your company goes overseas, that they will hire the local people, yet why are you claiming that Chinese companies aren't hiring Westerners?
    1
  19407.  @junebug8485  You said: "The average pay is only around 500 dollars per month for these workers, meanwhile the average american gets payed more than 8x this amount..." Because the cost of living in China is (generally) lower than in the United States. In China, food is cheaper, rent is cheaper, transportation is cheaper. Gas is cheaper since China bought Russia gas at a discount, and the bus fares and trains fares are cheaper. Alternative, if you want to use rental bikes to cycle in China, they are a cheaper way to get around the cities. So how can you compare the average pay between a Chinese worker and an American worker and claim that Chinese are slaving away? I mean, there are Westerners that work in China for low pay as well. I don't like the term often used to describe these Western low--pay workers,
    1
  19408.  @junebug8485  "神州 Shenzhou On behalf of the culture comment. More people around the world use and wear western products than Chinese products." Are you sure? China is the biggest trading partner with many countries around the world, including even Japan and South Korea which you mentioned, and Made-in-China products are far more widespread than Made-in-America products.
    1
  19409.  @junebug8485  But it's a Chinese product, when the Made-in-China label is slapped on it. Who said anything about it being designed or invented by the Chinese?
    1
  19410.  @junebug8485  No, you clearly said: "More people around the world use and wear western products than Chinese products." but the fact is that those are Made-in-China products, not Made-in-America products. The definition of "product" (according to Oxford Dictionary) is an article or substance that is manufactured or refined for sale. Who said anything about it being designed or invented by the Chinese? So as long as those products have the Made-in-China label slapped on them, then they are Chinese products, not Western products. You said: "If I were to order you to make shoes for me at a low pay rate, would you garner any sort of influence from that? You would not." Of course I would garner influence. If I choose to not to follow your orders, then you will no longer have shoes. There's always a demand for Made-in-China products (primarily for their affordability) so if the factory of the world chooses not to make products for your country, then it's apparent that China exerts influence over you. Can't you see it?
    1
  19411.  @junebug8485  Earlier you said that more people around the world wear Western products than Chinese products, but if you look at the global clothing industry, then China is the world's largest exporter of textiles and apparels. Here's a list of the top 10 textile exporters in the world in 2018 and China ranks first. Top 10 Textile Exporters in the World in 2018 by export value ($ billion) 1. Mainland China ($118.5 billion) 2. EU ($74 billion) 3. India ($18.1 billion) 4. United States ($13.8 billion) 5. Turkey ($11.9 billion) 6. South Korea ($9.8 billion) 7. Taiwan, China ($9.2 billion) 8. Vietnam ($8.3 billion) 9. Pakistan ($8.0 billion) 10. Hong Kong, China ($7.4 billion) ... Source: WTO (So your statement that more people around the world wear Western products than Chinese products is false and China exports more textile and apparel than the West.)
    1
  19412.  @junebug8485  I'm not talking about factory workers quitting, I'm talking about U.S being unable to decouple from China. China is the world's factory after all, so there's always a demand for Made-in-China products. Even if U.S stops buying Chinese products, there are other emerging markets in South America, Africa, the Middle East, ASEAN countries that China can sell our products to. Isn't this the influence China holds over the U.S, that if not for China, Americans will have no shoes? You said: "I would see how you think this is exerting influence, but it barely does." It's clearly influence, because if the U.S decouples from China, then the U.S will have no shoes. Why can't you see that this is a form of influence in of itself? You said: "Moving factories takes time, and the process is already under way - albeit slowly but surely." How will India ship those Made-in-India goods across the Pacific Ocean to the United States to compete with Made-in-China products? China is home to many of the world's busiest ports List of busiest container ports 1. Shanghai (China) 2. Singapore (Singapore) 3. Ningbo-Zhoushan (China) 4. Shenzhen (China) 5. Guangzhou (China) *6. Qindao (China)8 7. Busan (South Korea) 8. Hong Kong (China) 9. Tianjin (China) 10. Los Angeles (United States) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of busiest container ports So how will those other countries ship their goods to compete with China's?
    1
  19413.  @junebug8485  You said: "When it comes to what everyday people buy from stores, products come in the form of brands." The definition of "product" (according to Oxford) is an article or substance that is manufactured or refined for sale. China is the world's largest exporter of clothing, so if we go by the Oxford definition of product then it's apparent that more people in the world wear Chinese products than Western products. As long a product is produced in China then clearly it's Made-in-China, not Made-in-USA. Top 10 Textile Exporters in the World in 2018 by export value ($ billion) 1. Mainland China ($118.5 billion) 2. EU ($74 billion) 3. India ($18.1 billion) 4. United States ($13.8 billion) 5. Turkey ($11.9 billion) 6. South Korea ($9.8 billion) 7. Taiwan, China ($9.2 billion) 8. Vietnam ($8.3 billion) 9. Pakistan ($8.0 billion) 10. Hong Kong, China ($7.4 billion) ... Source: WTO
    1
  19414.  @junebug8485  Not just clothing, but China is also the world's largest shoe exporter. In 2021, China was the leading exporter of footwear worldwide, with an export value of over 42 billion U.S. dollars. Vietnam ranked second, exporting approximately 23.5 billion U.S. dollar's worth of footwear. Leading exporters of footwear worldwide in 2021, based on export value 1. China ($42,672 million) 2. Vietnam ($23,496 million) 3. Italy ($12,160 million) 4. Germany ($9,202 million) 5. Indonesia ($7,776 million) 6. Belgium ($7,107 million) 7. France ($4,655 million) 8. Netherlands ($4,586 million) 9. Poland ($2,989 million) 10. Spain ($2,965 million) So it's certainly not true that more people in the world wear Western products compared to Chinese products.
    1
  19415. The word Aksai Chin is of Turkish origin in which Aksai means "White Brook" and Chin refers to China. Why should China cede our ancestral lands to India?
    1
  19416.  @srishtimishra19  You Indians complain Jammu & Kashmir belong to you, then why not seize J&K from Pakistan and China? Aksai Chin is historically Chinese territory so why should we cede our ancestral lands to India? Come and take it if you dare.
    1
  19417.  @srishtimishra19  Look at the rapping of Kashmiri women by Indian Army personnel. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_during_the_Kashmir_conflict Why should J&K be returned to India, so that Indian soldiers can take advantage of the vulnerable women in Kashmir?
    1
  19418.  @srishtimishra19  Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (world's most spoken language by number of speakers) Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth and they learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America. Have you actually been to Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region and see how prosperous it is?
    1
  19419.  Gemios  "神州 Shenzhou entire jammu kashmir sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh belongs to the India... and is in India" Then why Indians still complain about "Pakistan Occupied Kashmir" and Aksai Chin? If you claim those territory, then why not seize it from Pakistan and China?
    1
  19420.  @koblongata  You said China is very good at killing our own people in Tibet and Xinjiang, but the population of Tibetans in China actually grown over the years Population of Tibetans in China according to ethnic group censuses (1953-2020) 1953: 2,775,622 1964: 2,501,174 1982: 3,821,950 1990: 4,593,072 2000: 5,416,021 2010: 6,282,187 2020: 7,060,731 ... Even the population of Uighurs in China has grown over the years Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group censuses (1953-2020) 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 ... Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    1
  19421.  @koblongata  Corruption is a universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there's an ongoing anti-corruption campaign to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. The campaign netted over 120 high-ranking officials, including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders. More than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption in China. But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign, but even after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    1
  19422.  @koblongata  "No, capitalism is still working well so far if you look at world poverty rate," It's no secret today that Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    1
  19423.  @ivanmunoz4484  You said: "most Americans understand that the war is against putin not against the russian people but tension is high" If that's the case then why is USA sanctioning the Russian people? Why are ethnic Russians living the West being forced to condemn their motherland or else face discrimination in public? Russian athletes are banned from the Olympics, Russian chess players and tennis players are not allowed to compete unless they denounce their motherland. Russian musicians, dancers, composers, conductors, and other artists are being forced to condemn their homeland or else be given the sack, then how is this not an attack on the Russian people themselves?
    1
  19424.  @ivanmunoz4484  "sir I'm afraid you are misinformed those news stations are available to us but for one I don't speak Russian and also I don't see what important information the Russian news could have maybe you could explain why Russian new is so important" RT America is in English, not Russian, are you sure you actually logged into those website yourself? And the importance of Russian news is because it shows the Russian viewpoint of the Ukraine crisis, otherwise all you're hearing is just the Western MSM propaganda coverage of Ukraine.
    1
  19425.  @ivanmunoz4484  But U.S sanctions on Russia are effectively targeting Russian civilians, not Putin's administration. And how does that explain the Americans/Europeans targeting ethnic Russians living in the West if they refuse to condemn their motherland? The Russian athletes getting banned from the Olympics, Russian tennis and chess players being barred from competitions if they refuse to condemn their motherland, and Russian musicians, composers, conductors, ballet dancers and other artists getting discriminated against if they refuse to condemn their motherland? You speak of "freedom of speech" in the West, yet none of these Russians are allowed to speak positively of Russia without facing consequences from the West. (If anything, this shows that Westerners are targeting ethnic Russians themselves, not the Putin administration. The Russian government is largely unaffected by Western sanctions) And what do you mean no proof of NAZI in Ukraine? There are so many Western documentaries by BBC and other MSM depicting Ukrainian Nazis. Even NATO posted photos of Ukrainian troops on Twitter and it was found that many Ukrainian soldiers had Nazi emblems (from the SS) on their uniform insignia.
    1
  19426.  @ivanmunoz4484  "神州 Shenzhou yes sire I am sure if you'd like i can send you a photo of the website if that will satisfy your thirst just say the word." Then why'd you bring up yourself not speaking Russian when RT America is in English, not Russian? And the Russian people know about how Ukrainian ultra-nationalist neo nazis like the Azov Battalion have been carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Lugansk. Over the course of 8 years, over 13,000 people have been killed in the Donbas region by shelling from both sides, and the Minsk Accord was meant to stop the fighting, include a ceasefire, faciliate withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line and institute constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas. The Minsk Agreement was not honored in the end. Every Russian by now knows this, it's been shown on their television screens for 8 years. But ask many Europeans, Americans and other Westerners and many of them haven't heard of this ongoing civil war in Ukraine. "3. The Americans are using Ukraine to build chemical weapons to attack Russia" Even Victoria Nuland has admitted that bio-labs exist in Ukraine, and USA is accusing Russia of potentially conducting false flag operations if those data "fall into Russian hands"
    1
  19427.  @ivanmunoz4484  Then why didn't Imperial Japan surrender after U.S bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Because USA mostly killed civilians and the change to the Japanese Army strength was negligible, that's why Imperial Japan saw no need to surrender. Check out the last campaign fought of WWII, it's the Soviet invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria that finally caused Japan to surrender and brought WWII to an end, so shouldn't credit go to the Soviet communists for bringing about the end of WWII?
    1
  19428.  @ivanmunoz4484  Imperial Japan did not surrender even after the first U.S bombing in Hiroshima, neither did they after the second bombing targeting Nagasaki. It took the Soviet invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria that finally caused Japan to surrender at the end of WWII, so why'd you claim that "神州 Shenzhou a nuclear bomb is scarier than a russian." when all it took was one Soviet invasion, compared to two U.S nuclear bombings? And USA only joined the war against Japan because they bombed Pearl Harbour, not for Russia or China's sake.
    1
  19429.  @LisbonLion7  Chairman Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    1
  19430.  @LisbonLion7  No US President intervened to stop USSR and China from nuclear war in 1969, the Soviets choose not to fire nukes. In the entire history of the world, the United States is the only country in the world to have dropped nuclear weapons on another country's turf.
    1
  19431.  @LisbonLion7  But once again, no US President intervened to stop USSR and China from nuclear war in 1969, the Soviets choose not to fire nukes. Even in your description you never even mentioned any U.S president yourself for crying out loud!
    1
  19432.  @LisbonLion7  I read through your texts, and even you did not name the U.S President who intervened to stop the Soviet Union from launching nuclear weapons at China in 1969, so what's the point of your comments then?
    1
  19433.  @LisbonLion7  Censorship exists even on a Western platform like YouTube. But what makes you think that I'm somehow responsible for YouTube blocking your comments?
    1
  19434.  @LisbonLion7  But President Nixon did not intervened. Pardon me, but this is your question (quoting your words): "神州 Shenzhou Which US president intervened to stop Russia from destroying China with a nuclear strike, back in the autumn of 69?" But my answer is that no U.S President intervened. Where's the U.S intervention in 1969 then?
    1
  19435.  @LisbonLion7  So my answer that "No US President intervened to stop USSR and China from nuclear war in 1969, the Soviets choose not to fire nukes." remains unchallenged. In the entire history of the world, the United States is the only country in the world to have dropped nuclear weapons on another country's turf.
    1
  19436.  @charleswomack2166  How would you know if those people you received comments from are Wumaos?
    1
  19437.  @charleswomack2166  Given that you've constantly replying to me, I take it that you assume I'm not one of them right?
    1
  19438.  @oceanbreeze89  Why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and fled to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Defeating the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT, yet despite all their initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while at the same time cementing the communists right to rule China.
    1
  19439.  @stopwarstop7334  Is there a build-up of People's Liberation Army soldiers at the mainland/Taiwan border in the Taiwan Strait (like the build-up of Russian soldiers at its border with Ukraine)? If not, then do you have any evidence that mainland China is going to attack Taiwan island?
    1
  19440.  @宋庆-i4m  Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, but the island is considered to be under a rogue government by the mainland.
    1
  19441.  @宋庆-i4m  I just explained that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, but it's under a rogue government by the mainland. Didn't you read what I said?
    1
  19442.  @ngawangyoga9258  Here's video of Tibetan female helicopter pilot showcasing beautiful Lhasa from the sky. Why can't Chinese bring modernity to Tibet? You think every Tibetan kid wants to grow up to be dirt-poor yak herder or Buddhist monk, is that it? Video: Tibetan female helicopter pilot shows Lhasa from the sky youtu.be/wyE6YjcPZHI Twenty-three-year-old Janre Yeshe comes from a family of herdsmen in Lhasa City's Damshung County in Tibet Autonomous Region. She was one of 28 Tibetans who succeeded in achieving their dream of being among the first Tibetan pilots to obtain a license. "I feel a sense of accomplishment when I take tourists to see Lhasa from the air," she says.
    1
  19443.  @ngawangyoga9258  You're overseas Tibetan living comfortably in Paris, then who are you to speak on behalf of the Tibetans living on the harsh mountainous conditions of the Tibetan Plateau? Here's video of Worlds Highest Craft Beer Brewery, Tibet Aku Pema Brewing in Lhasa Tibet. Video: Worlds Highest Craft Beer Brewery - Lhasa Tibet youtu.be/UYCyhUyGuMw
    1
  19444.  @ngawangyoga9258  No, you're an overseas Tibetan living comfortably in lower attitudes in Paris, not the Tibetans living on the harsh mountainous conditions on the Tibetan Plateau, the infertile soil, scarce rainfall, high altitudes and low-oxygen environments. Here's another video showcasing life inside Lhasa, Tibet's sacred capital. Video: Lhasa: Life inside Tibet's sacred capital youtu.be/RG2rivR-FxM
    1
  19445.  @ngawangyoga9258  Here's stunning aerial drone footage of Qamdo, Tibet Autonomous Region, China. At night the city lights up in beautiful display. Video: Exclusive: Stunning drone footage of Tibet's Qamdo youtu.be/XrfQ4kKzq5E The ancient city of Qamdo, which means "juncture of rivers" in the Tibetan language, has long been regarded as the eastern gate of China's Tibet Autonomous Region.
    1
  19446.  @ngawangyoga9258  Because the Tibetan nomads have been overgrazing their pastures (they even fought each other for the best pastures), that's why the government stepped in control the grazing. Here's interview with Tibetan yak herder and the government even compensate the herder's lost livestock if wolves prey on their herds. Video: Visiting Tibetan Herdsmen (Footage From Livestream) youtube.com/watch?v=f1ANXZIFbGs
    1
  19447.  @louiegonzales1407  What's so funny?
    1
  19448.  @Kemet3.0  About technology in China, China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    1
  19449.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  Why do you want the Communist Party of China to go? The CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China?
    1
  19450.  SS3 Super  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationthailand.com/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  19451.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  China has survived for 5000 years without ever adopting liberal democracy, then why is there a urgent need to replace our political system? China's political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western liberal democracy? Because Westerners say so? Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  19452.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  Belligerent path? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. So which country is aims for peace and which country is a warmonger?
    1
  19453.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  19454.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  The Nazis were voted into power through democracy by preying on German people's resentment towards the humiliating Treaty of Versailles and Hitler promised to make Germany great again. Just like Donald Trump preyed on gullible Americans' resentment towards China and he promised to make America great again. So why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western liberal democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    1
  19455.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  So now that you exposed the flaws of democracy, then why should China abandon our political system and adopt liberal democracy? Democracy has produced leaders like Hitler and Trump, who've led their country to ruin, then why should China adopt liberal democracy? Because you say so? Previously under "democratic" Republic of China 🇹🇼, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today under the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. So why should China switch to liberal democracy?
    1
  19456.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  Nazi party was voted into power through democracy, then why the heck should China abandon our political system (which clearly works for China) and adopt liberal democracy? You make no sense, because Hitler was voted into power by democracy, so you're saying China should switch to liberal democracy? What's your logic? You just can't stand to see China succeed without adopting your Western democracy that's all.
    1
  19457.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  What genocide are you talking about? Ethnic minorities in China (Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchu, etc) aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size, so what genocide are you talking about? Here's the population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups If China was really fascist like Germany, we would be promoting Han ethnicity in our media, but where does Chinese media showcase Han supremacy?
    1
  19458.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  Under fascism, Nazi Germany controlled the German media and promoted the idea that an Aryan race is superior over others, like the Jews. If China was fascist like Nazi Germany, we would be seeing the same sort of narrative promoting Han race over others, yet we don't see that in Chinese media. Video: American REACTS To Chinese Media on Poverty! youtu.be/BeMfSulfSsM
    1
  19459.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  19460.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  China is home to two of top five world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) and Tianhe-2 (天河-2) and in 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Video: Sunway TaihuLight named world's fastest supercomputer youtu.be/KEdsrT1mFAU Source: China surpasses US in supercomputers usage on Top500 list cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion).
    1
  19461.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  China's dictatorship has served China well, for 5000 years of Chinese history, then why should China abandon our political system (that works) for Western democracy (that doesn't)? What is your logic here? You don't tolerate any political system that happens to you differ from yours?
    1
  19462.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  Again, why do you want Chinese people to overthrow our government? The CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China? Because you can't stand to see China succeed under a dictatorship? Just who do you think you are?
    1
  19463.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  Look, China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  19464.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    1
  19465.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  I have already explained that Nazi was voted into power through democracy, by preying on German people's resentment towards the humiliating Treaty of Versailles and Hitler promised to make Germany great again. Just like Trump preyed on gullible Americans resentment towards China and he promised to make America great again. So why should China abandon our political system and adopt liberal democracy like Germany and America? Because Westerners say so? Why can't you accept China's political system works for China?
    1
  19466.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  If since we are all human beings, then why can't China keep our political system (which clearly works for China) while you keep your own political system? Why do you insist on imposing your own political system onto China? China is flourishing under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western liberal democracy? Because you say so?
    1
  19467.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-graft campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign, but after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption. So why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western liberal democracy? China can pursue anti-corruption campaigns while under dictatorship, then what seems to be the problem?
    1
  19468.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  Look, China has even launched space stations into orbit, the world's 3rd to do so after USA and USSR. China's first prototype space station, Tiangong-1 was launched in 2011, followed by Tiangong-2 in 2016. There was even a "space lecture" where Chinese taikonaut in space gave a lecture to her students on the ground from onboard Tiangong-1, demonstrating simple micro-gravity experiments in space. Video: Chinese teacher in space gives lecture to her students on the ground below youtu.be/OUAuZnpoZ58 By doing this, we are showing our kids (and future generations of Chinese) that China is both ancient civilization as well as a modern space nation, capable of achieving equally impressive feats as the Westerners in space. China is no longer the sick man of Asia, in fact, China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, and India have not launched space stations of their own into orbit.
    1
  19469.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. So which country is warmonger and which country is pacifist? It's like your blind to the warmongering tendencies of USA and deliberately painting China as the enemy.
    1
  19470.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  Over 100 officials of provincial-ministerial level and above have been implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China, which began after the 18th Party Congress in 2012. Source: Officials implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China (2012–2017) wikipedia.org/wiki/Officials_implicated_by_the_anti-corruption_campaign_in_China_(2012%E2%80%932017)#:~:text=Over,2012
    1
  19471.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  So China's system has shown to working, whereas you exposed USA system as not working, then why do you still insist China abandon our political system and adopt US political system? Our political system clearly works for China, why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western liberal democracy? Because you say so?
    1
  19472.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  China has even landed on the Moon. In 2013, China landed our very own lunar spacecraft and lunar rover (Chang'e 3 嫦娥-3 and Yutu 玉兔 "Jade Rabbit") on the Moon, making China the world's 3rd nation to make a soft-landing on Earth's celestial neighbor. Source: China Lands On The Moon space.com/23968-china-moon-rover-historic-lunar-landing.html In October 2015, the Jade Rabbit set the record for the longest operational period for a rover on the Moon. The rover's ground penetrating radar found evidence of at least 9 distinct rock layers. Video: China moon landing video: 'Jade Rabbit' rover soft-lands on lunar surface youtube.com/watch?v=XpAwmVPT758 Through this, China is showing that Chinese people are capable of achieving equally impressive feats as Westerners in space.
    1
  19473.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  Taiwan is suffering under democracy, look at Taiwan parliament members fighting, throwing furniture and water balloons (they actually prepared those?) so can you imagine such violence erupting in the government of China if we were democracy? Video: Taiwanese parliament broke out into a water balloon and chair-throwing brawl youtu.be/mMvkusAI9DM
    1
  19474.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  China is the world's first to land on the far side of the Moon. China's Chang'e-4 (嫦娥四号) achieved the first soft landing on the far side of the Moon, on 3 January 2019, using a relay satellite Queqiao (鹊桥 'Bridge of Magpies') Video: China is the First to land on the Dark Side of the Moon youtu.be/JWlxoU5DpLk The Chinese lunar rover Yutu-2 (玉兔二号 'Jade Rabbit 2') explored the Von Kármán crater on the Moon's far side, and even conducted experiments on the Moon such as growing cotton seeds on the Moon (first biological matter to be grown on the Moon) Video: Chinese space mission brings first seeds to life on moon’s surface youtu.be/Zu-G-MncYaw Through this, we are showing that we Chinese people are just as capable as Westerners in space achievements, and that we are also pioneers in space exploration. Why should Chinese people consider ourselves inferior to Westerners? We need to shrug off this misconception, else Chinese (and other Asians) will always be behind Westerners in achievements if our mindsets don't change.
    1
  19475.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  If you really consider Chinese as part of the global family, then why aren't you happy for China's achievements? In 2016, China completed world's largest radio telescope, the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) also known as Tianyan (天眼 'Eye of the Heavens'). The 1,650-foot-wide dish was built in China's Guizhou Province and will help scientists learn more about the universe's early days, detect low-frequency gravitational waves and hunt for signals that may have been produced by distant alien civilizations. Source: China Finishes Building World's Largest Radio Telescope space.com/33357-china-largest-radio-telescope-alien-life.html The larger the radio dish, the more sensitive it is to picking up signals from space and FAST's potential to discover an alien civilization will be 5 to 10 times that of current equipment, as it can see farther and darker planets. Video: FAST: The World's Largest Telescope | A China Icons Video youtu.be/7SRV3rnULO0
    1
  19476.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  But you aren't happy with China's progress, so why pretend that you're interested in a global family, when you don't care about China's achievements? Since its trial operations began in 2016, China's FAST radio telescope has discovered 44 new pulsars. Video: 44 pulsars identified by China's FAST telescope youtu.be/t9nySMjiUzw
    1
  19477.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  China's FAST telescope has identified 93 new pulsars since October 2017. Now that in my opinion, is a good contribution to humanity's understanding of the heavens above. Video: China's FAST telescope identifies 93 pulsars youtu.be/t6XGW3BrDEA
    1
  19478.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  All this talk about a global family, yet whenever I bring up China's achievements, you aren't happy? Then why pretend that you're part of a global family, when you can't even bring yourself to acknowledge China's achievements under the Communist Party of China? You just can't stand to see China succeed under the a dictatorship that's all, what's all this talk about being myopic when you can't even look past the differences in political system and look towards the future?
    1
  19479.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  For all your talk about a global family, you can't even bring yourself to congratulate China's successes, why pretend you're a global citizen when you're not? You can't stand to see China succeed under the Communist Party of China, that's why you never acknowledged China's accomplishments. And about peace, I already said multiple times that China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w It's like your blind to the true warmongering country here and just equate China with Nazis, when we already established that the Nazis were voted into power through democracy. What more needs to be said?
    1
  19480.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  About long-term progress, China has produced a 5-year plan, 10-year plan, 20-year plan, 30-year plan, to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040 and 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's authoritative political system. Whereas in the United States for example, the U.S presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of Western democracy. So since China's political system works for China (and is advantageous long term) then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western liberal democracy? Can't you analyse the political systems logically, without bringing in your anti-China biase?
    1
  19481.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  You said you're a student of history, then you should know that for the past 1000-2000 years of human history, people have traditionally gravitated towards authoritarian/oligarchic systems of government. Political power was oftentimes not in the hands of the masses, instead it was concentrated in the hands of the few elites, be it nobles (aristocracy), priests (theocracy), or kings and emperors (monarchy). Such authoritarian/oligarchic systems are prevalent throughout the world, because they were stable and frankly because they worked. The elites were oftentimes well-educated and politically savvy enough to make important decisions regarding the country's future, while the ignorant masses were kept far away from politics. Whereas frankly speaking, democracy has a long history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, even the Republic of Rome eventually crumbled. These proto-democracies weren't successful and democracy wasn't even popular outside of Greece throughout the ancient world, most ancient nations were authoritarian/oligarchic. Even modern liberal democracy only has a history of 100-200 years, so it's not automatically guaranteed to be successful in the long term. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  19482.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  Why don't you share your thoughts with me? You can't refute the points I brought so you just repeat the same thing again and again?
    1
  19483.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  You accuse me of parroting, whereas all you can do now is repeat yourself? I have cited numerous reasons why China's political system is successful under the Communist Party of China, but you only single minded wish for Chinese people to overthrow our government, which would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country. You're clearly anti-China, why pretend to be a global citizen when you care absolutely nothing for China's interests, nor do you actually want China to succeed?
    1
  19484.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  China has launched a rocket carrying its Chang’e-5 robotic spacecraft to the Moon to collect lunar rocks and soil – the first such mission by any country since the 1970s. Video: China launches Chang’e-5 mission to bring back rocks from moon youtu.be/yT3enRxy3o0
    1
  19485.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  China successfully guided its Chang’e 5 spacecraft lander and ascender vehicle on the surface of the Moon late on December 1, 2020. After touching down at a designated location, the probe completed drilling to gather samples of lunar soil early on December 2, according to the China National Space Administration (aka Chinese NASA) Video: China’s Chang’e 5 makes lunar touchdown, collects rocks and soil on the moon youtu.be/M1Kamdgviyg
    1
  19486.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  China has successfully completed its lunar mission after the Chang’e 5 spacecraft made a safe landing in Siziwang Banner of the Inner Mongolia autonomous region early on December 17, 2020. Video: China’s Chang’e 5 lunar mission returns to Earth with moon samples youtu.be/D3Fb4L6AQEI The mission brought back the first rock samples from the moon in 44 years, making China the third country to have collected lunar samples.
    1
  19487.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  China sets up first Lunar Sample Laboratory. The samples will be transported to Beijing, where the country's first Lunar Sample Laboratory has been set up. Experts have designed special rooms and equipment for unsealing and storing the materials, and the lab has strict requirements of processing and working. Video: China sets up first Lunar Sample Laboratory youtu.be/7hY3fpi71n8
    1
  19488.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  The return capsule of the Chang’e-5 lunar mission was opened on 19 December 2020, in Beijing, China. Scientists extracted the lunar sample container and the China National Space Administration (CNSA) handed over the lunar samples to the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) for research. Video: Chang’e-5 lunar samples extracted from the capsule youtu.be/UWVkJXEMKpo
    1
  19489.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  How is China fascist? Nazi Germany promoted the idea of racial superiority and the Jews as inferior, but China promotes ethnic minorities cultures instead of Han superiority. Video: American REACTS To Chinese Media on Poverty! youtu.be/BeMfSulfSsM Fascism is when politicians like Donald Trump don't condone the actions of white supremacists like the Proud Boys.
    1
  19490.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  Look at USA being warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w Whereas China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Which country is more likely to start WW3, you tell me?
    1
  19491.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  Look at thousands of years of human history and democracy has a long history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, even the Republic of Rome eventually crumbled. These proto-democracies weren't successful and democracy wasn't even popular outside of Greece throughout the ancient world, most ancient nations were authoritarian/oligarchic. Even modern liberal democracy only has a history of 100-200 years, so it's not automatically guaranteed to be successful in the future. But China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  19492.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  China also demonstrated the ability to launch rockets from a floating platform in the Yellow Sea, making China the world's 3rd nation to master maritime launch technology, after USA and USSR. Video: China's first satellite launch from floating sea platform sees it rocket ahead in space race youtu.be/AOEJeHJj7kI The Long March 11WEY vehicle carried seven satellites into space. Ocean platforms are more flexible to use and reduce the risk of rocket debris hitting populated areas. Launch services may even be offered to countries that sign up for China's Belt and Road Initiative.
    1
  19493.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  You can't even formulate a proper reason why Chinese people should overthrow our government (which has been extremely successful in governing China). The collapse of the Communist Party of China would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China? You don't care about China's interests, you claim to be a global citizen yet you can't even bring yourself to properly congratulate China's achievements under the CPC, this shows you don't want to see China succeed that's all.
    1
  19494.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  The United States is the one sending warships and aircraft carrier strike groups halfway across the globe to South China Sea, why are you deliberately acting blind to the true warmonger here? You're just biased against China that's all, why pretend you're a global citizen when you're not?
    1
  19495.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  I expect you to attempt to refute my points presented, but so far, all you done is mock China's political system despite the many successes China has achieved under communist party leadership. I've already shown that Nazi were voted into power democratically by the German people who wanted to make Germany great again. Just like Trump was voted into power by Americans wanting to make America great again. So Nazi came to power in democracy, then why should China abandon our political system and adopt liberal democracy?
    1
  19496.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  The former Soviet Union, Russia embraced democracy after USSR collapse, yet USA still treat Russia as the enemy, so what makes you think China embracing democracy will stop the West from going to war? You just can't stand to see China succeed under a political system that's not liberal democracy that's all, that why you want to impose your political system onto China.
    1
  19497.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  You can't refute my points so you resort to labelling me incorrigible? Russia abandoned communism and took up democracy, yet the United States still treat Russia like the enemy, so what makes you think China embracing democracy will stop USA from treating China as the enemy? You mean you never thought this through? You just want China to abandon our political system (that works for China) and adopt Western liberal democracy, because you think USA will stop treating China like the enemy?
    1
  19498.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  You certainly can't teach history with your inability to refute points brought up. About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA. The test is given every three years to 15-year-olds around the world and measures their knowledge in reading, science and mathematics. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    1
  19499.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  China is home to many of the world's largest banks including ICBC, China Construction Bank, AgBank, Bank of China, Bank of Communications, Postal Savings Bank of China, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank (China), Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, China CITIC Bank, China Minsheng Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Hua Xia Bank, Bank of Beijing, China Guangfa Bank, Bank of Shanghai, Bank of Jiangsu, China Zheshang Bank and so on. Source: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks#By_total_assets
    1
  19500.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  The number of wealthy Chinese people has overtaken the number of rich Americans for the first time, according to a report by Credit Suisse. Source: China overtakes US in rankings of world’s richest people theguardian.com/business/2019/oct/21/china-overtakes-us-in-rankings-of-worlds-richest-people The bank’s annual wealth survey found there were 100 million Chinese people among the world’s top 10% of richest people, compared with 99 million in the US.
    1
  19501.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  I already refuted this point, what genocide are you talking about? Ethnic minorities in China (Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchu, etc) aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size, so what genocide are you talking about? Here's the population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  19502.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  My username 神州 Shenzhou means "The Divine Lands" and its one of the ancient literary names used to refer to China. Source: Names of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_China#Shenzhou It's also a homonym of 神舟 Shenzhou "Divine Vessel" which is China's human spaceflight program. It shows China is both an ancient civilization as well as a modern space nation.
    1
  19503.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  I had the opportunity to learn English and travel abroad, and I was appalled at the sheer amount of anti-China Western propaganda out there! I tried to explain to Westerners that China is not like that portrayed in the media, but many Westerners just laughed at me and label me brainwashed. When I bring up examples of China's achievements, they Westerners just call me a communist party shill and said "Go back to China if you like it there!" The same anti-China Westerners claim that they know China better than me, a Chinese, yet they haven't actually set foot in China and see what life is like here for themselves, yet they already harbour negative opinion about our country. Yet, I'm the one who literally grew up in China.
    1
  19504.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  "神州 Shenzhou we are all tribalistic by nature" That's exactly your tribalistic behaviour, when you simply refused to acknowledge China's achievements under the Communist Party of China, yet you proclaim yourself a global citizen of a global family? A true global citizen would congratulation China's achievements, not claim Chinese people should overthrow our government because you can't stand to see China succeed.
    1
  19505.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  I've met many anti-China people like you, who always use the same stale excuse of "I'm not anti-China, I'm just anti-CPC" to defend themselves and justify their anti-China stance. But it's clear that you care absolutely nothing for China's interests, nor do you actually want China to succeed, you repeatedly wished for Chinese people to overthrow our government (which would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country) so why pretend that you're not anti-China when you clearly are? You can't stand to see China succeed under a different political system, you care absolutely nothing for China's interests, why continue to pretend that you do? You keep on trying to impose your political system onto China, when China's political system clearly works for China.
    1
  19506.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  Because I read your comments and you care nuts for China's interests, you want Chinese people to overthrow our government, because you don't want China to succeed, so why pretend that you're not anti-China when you clearly are? You anti-China people always use the same excuse of "I'm not anti-China, I'm just anti-CPC" to defend yourself, the truth is that you don't want China to succeed under a different political system from yours!
    1
  19507.  @ĎẹĵäPüĥ  If China can someday surpass the United States as the premier world superpower in the future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this eventual goal, while following our own political system? China should follow our own path to success, not blindly copy Western democracy, just because people like you seek to impose your political system onto China.
    1
  19508.  @verygood5560  Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that the cost of living in America is kept to a minimum. Think about the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent elsewhere on housing, cars, luxury brands, tuition fees, and so on. Isn't that why many Americans flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money?
    1
  19509.  SS3 Super  Hijacked the land? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang 🇹🇼 had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist 🇨🇳 peasants and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland.
    1
  19510.  @MegaBanne  Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? The Communist Party of China transformed China from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  19511.  @MegaBanne  The Chinese government is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending after the USA: Countries by Research and Development spending 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($275.0 billion) 3. Japan ($165.7 billion) 4. Germany ($118.8 billion) 5. South Korea ($91.6 billion) 6. India ($66.5 billion) 7. Brazil ($38.0 billion) 8. United Kingdom ($44.8 billion) 9. Russia ($42.6 billion) 10 France ($38.4 billion) ... Source: List of countries by research and development spending wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending#List In the West, researchers often have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    1
  19512.  @MegaBanne   About IP, China applies for more patents than any other country in the world and have world's largest number of granted patents, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators. Patent applications for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (1,542,002 patents) 2. United States (597,141 patents) 3. Japan (313,567 patents) 4. South Korea (209,992 patents) 5. European Patent Office (174,397 patents) ... Patent grants for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (432,147 patents) 2. United States (307,759 patents) 3. Japan (194,525 patents) 4. European Patent Office (127,603 patents) 5. South Korea (119,012 patents) ... Source: World Intellectual Property Indicators
    1
  19513.  @MegaBanne  Countries ranked by Patent applications in 2018 by World Intellectual Property Indicators 1. China (1,393,815 patents) 2. United States (285,095 patents) 3. Japan (253,630 patents) 4. Korea (162,561 patents) 5. Germany (46,617 patents) 6. Russia (24,926 patents) 7. India (16,289 patents) 8. France (14,303 patents) 9. United Kingdom (12,865 patents) 10. Iran (11,908 patents) ……
    1
  19514.  @MegaBanne  China publishes more research papers than any other in the world, over a wide range of topics such as physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences. Countries by published scientific papers in 2018: 1. China (528,263 articles) 2. United States (422,808 articles) 3. India (135,788 articles) 4. Germany (104,396 articles) 5. Japan (98,793 articles) 6. United Kingdom (97,681 articles) 7. Russia (81,579 8. Italy (71,240 articles) 9. South Korea (66,376 articles) ... Source: List of countries by number of scientific and technical journal articles wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_scientific_and_technical_journal_articles
    1
  19515.  @MegaBanne  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html
    1
  19516.  Atma 01  "神州 Shenzhou the entirety of the little Nepal dispute is aided by China," Can't China aid our neighbouring country Nepal? And why do you belittle Nepal as "little Nepal" just because your country is larger?
    1
  19517.  @Srikar-on9ib  "神州 Shenzhou Those are traditionally Indian territories, and look who's talking, China annexed Tibet and Aksai Chin," So why India can claim those traditional Indian territories, then why can't China claim our traditional territory of Tibet and Aksai Chin? Tibet is part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China, and Aksai Chin is a Turkish word where Aksai means "white brook" and Chin refers to China. Can't you see your biased double standards when you support India traditional claim but not China's?
    1
  19518.  Section B Shuffled 2K-15  These Indians support India's claims over traditional territory like Goa, Tripura, Manipur, Sikkim, Jammu & Kashmir, but they don't recognise China's traditional claims over Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, etc, because they harbour biased against China and apply double standards between India historical claims and China's historical claim. And they themselves are oblivious to it.
    1
  19519. 第四次工业革命是一次重大的信息处理技术革命，信息处理技术将进入移动互联时代。物联网得到全面发展，将使信息技术处理进入移动互联的全新阶段。移动信息技术带来空间和时间的灵活性，将改变商业运作模式，促进整个工业及经济更加系统化。
    1
  19520. China used more concrete in 3 years than the U.S used in the entire 20th century.
    1
  19521. China literally used more concrete in 3 years than the U.S.A did for the whole 20th century.
    1
  19522.  @rickeydu8742  My point is that the population of Uighurs in China nearly quadrupled from 3 million (1953) to 11 million (2020), yet the Western claims of Uighur genocide still persist, despite the lack of concrete evidence.
    1
  19523.  @zszs100  I need to come up with an entry for 2020 to keep the list growing…
    1
  19524. On the other hand, there are Westerners journalists writing articles about China, who don't even speak Mandarin themselves. How can people expect reliable reports from such Western journalists?
    1
  19525.  @birsiir8251  According to ( wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_overseas_military_bases ) China only has a handful of overseas bases, whereas USA has over 400 military bases in Okinawa Japan, South Korea, Philippines, etc surrounding China and containing China's rise.
    1
  19526.  @birsiir8251  You said: "Stop acting like China is very peaceful only be about its business and westerns are making problem." China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Which country do you think is the real threat to global peace and stability here?
    1
  19527.  @birsiir8251  You said: "Which country is planning to invade Taiwan USA or China?" If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of ROC Administrative and Claims. wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. If hypothetically, war breaks out between Taiwan and the mainland, then it would be a resumption of the unresolved Chinese Civil War and an internal civil war within China, not an invasion of another country. How can China invade ourselves when Taiwan considers itself part of China under their own constitution?
    1
  19528.  @birsiir8251  You asked: "Have you heard that US forces threatening Taiwan, Vietnam, Philippines, India or Japan?" Three American soldiers stationed at Okinawa raped a twelve-year-old Okinawan schoolgirl , sparking a wave of anti-base activism in Okinawa that had been simmering for decades, including an anti-base rally that brought out more than half of the Okinawan population. Yet despite the efforts of women activists, governor Masahide Ōta began using the case to push his own agenda and prestige. Soon the rape had become an allegory to talk about Okinawa generally, and promises from Japanese and American lawmakers to close a Marine Corps station halted, while the governor quietly renewed the leases for the US bases on the island. jacobinmag.com/2019/11/night-american-village-review-okinawa-base You think these people want US bases in their lands?
    1
  19529.  @birsiir8251  You asked: _"US participated Korean war for what do you think? Who took advantage of of that war, South Korean people or USA? Korea was once a unified country under Joseon Dynasty, until the Japanese invaded Korea and occupied it for 35 years, until WWII surrender, and Korea was (needlessly) divided into two countries, North Korea (Soviet Union) and South Korea (United States). North Korea wanted to end this humiliating division of their country and they almost succeeded (90%) in reunifying Korea, until the USA suddenly declared war on North Korea and pushed NK forces back past the 38th parallel line of division and into actual North Korean territory, right up to China's doorstep to North Korea. Thus, China had no choice and had to enter the Korean War to push the US forces back. The USA took advantage of that war to create military bases in South Korea (even till today) whereas People's Liberation Army soldiers have long withdrawn from North Korea.
    1
  19530.  @birsiir8251  You asked: "Had USA ever tried to invade Korea or they just left them alone in peace?" During the Korean War, the US forces pushed the North Korean forces back to the 38th Parallel, but they didn't stop there, they advanced past the Line of Division into actual North Korean territory, right up to China's doorstep with North Korea, so what makes you think USA did not invade Korea when they pushed past the Line of Division during the Korean War? Even today, US military forces continue to occupy South Korea, whereas Chinese PLA troops have long since withdrawn from North Korea and there are no Chinese military bases in North Korea.
    1
  19531.  The Hate Factory  Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Chairman Mao couldn't possibly control the weather isn't? And even if he could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. Yet Western media label Chairman Mao as mass murderer, when those people starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine?
    1
  19532. Nothing much came out of it. Xi Jinping knows that Joe Biden will say one thing (i.e Taiwan is part of China) but then the Biden administration back home does the opposite to contradict what he said.
    1
  19533. If you want to see millenia of Chinese history, visit Xi'an.. If you want to see centuries of Chinese history, visit Beijing. If you want to see decades of Chinese history, visit Shanghai. If you want to see the future, visit Shenzhen.
    1
  19534. Sometimes their criticism of China isn't fair and valid. For example, they posted videos entitled "Are Chinese Women easy?" or "China's Masculinity Crisis" just to attract viewers afflicted by yellow fever to come watch their videos.
    1
  19535. +China Driving Observations I did and didn't I stated earlier that it was posted to attract people with yellow fever and possibly seeking a Chinese wife? This practice of “clickbait” is widely practiced, but that doesn't mean that it is fair and valid. A lot of clickbait videos aren't fair and don't promise what they advertise isn't it? "Thin Skin"? Perhaps you are referring to Donald Trump who can't take criticism and constantly makes a nuisance of himself in the media? If you people see fit to criticize China, then why can't people like me criticize laowhy and serpentza? China is not above criticism, likewise neither are the people who make these videos. Why are you so "thin-skinned" and getting upset over what I said about laowhy?
    1
  19536. +China Driving Observations About President Trump, why is it the people of America choose to elect someone with zero political experience to guide their country? In contrast, President Xi Jinping has about 30-40 years of political experience which is why most Chinese people feel he is qualified to lead. You are guiding a country of 1.4 billion people (300 million for USA) so its important to have a strong, experienced leader at the helm. If you do not have "thin skin" then why do you seem to post a wall of text in response to my comments about laowhy and serpentza?
    1
  19537. +Erik Stinson Then what about "China's Masculinity Crisis" ? Its clearly a statement and an assumption that China has one in the first place. Also, haven't you noticed that laowhy and serpentza like to post videos with thumbnails featuring pretty Asian females? I have never claimed that Chinese women are mine. And when did I interfere in a situation? All I said was that they posted such videos to attract people with yellow fever that's all. And you made up so many assumptions about me just like that?
    1
  19538. +China Driving Observations Trump was an heir to a business empire from his father, whereas Xi Jinping's father was ex-propaganda chief banished to the countryside during the Cultural Revolution. As a child he lived in a cave house, feeding pigs and cleaning toilets, before returning to the party and rising through the ranks How Xi Jinping Went From Feeding Pigs to Ruling China Source: youtube.com/watch?v=D_WY63wm6Hw Even today, President Xi Jinping is among the world's least paid world leaders, at just $22,000 a year. As for the "thin-skin" comment, why are you getting so upset and obsessed over it? I have shown to be willing to engage in rational debate (as shown in my previous post). All I did was ask a question, that why do you seem to post a wall of text in response to my comments about laowhy and serpentza? Yet by asking this simple question, I am considered being obsessed on that, to the exclusion of everything else?
    1
  19539. +China Driving Observations About Xi Jinping amassing that wealth before becoming President, lets face it, the real world is ruled by money and modern China is no exception. Realistically, you'll need capital in order to enact change upon the world. In the bloodthirsty and cutthroat politics of the CCP, you won't get far as a lowly-paid official unless you can garner support from other members. Its the truth of politics worldwide. But its precisely this type of environment, that China's leaders are forged and groomed to become powerful. Power should not just be freely given to people unless they can hold it. Look at Donald Trump just waltzing into the White House, because he criticized and attacked his political opponents, and preyed on voters gullibility with false promises of making America great again. And just like that, he won. In China's case, if you want change, you join the CCP and start working your way up the ranks, garnering support from other CCP members. Its a slow and tedious process, but at least Chinese leaders have attained lots of political experience before assuming their post. If you don't want change, then you are excluded from the voting process, so as not to jeopardize the elections. China's political system is not in any way perfect, but it helps ensures that people who do vote are politically aware and qualified to do so, and the billions of other unqualified people do not interfere in elections.
    1
  19540. +Movin On How is my analysis of them so embarrassingly off? Could you elaborate on their characters then? After watching their videos, I get the impression that serpentza and laowhy don't consider China their homeland, neither do they consider Chinese people their own fellow countrymen. They constantly refer to China like its some strange foreign place filled with people with cultures different from their own. To me, they are just "working" in China, but they aren't truly "living" in China. The term "Yellow Fever" has its origins in the West, not in China. And didn't serpentza and laowhy married Chinese wives and moved to China? Is it because they couldn't make it in their own home country, that's why they moved to China? About comparing Chinese women with South Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Thailand, etc, every person have their own tastes. But why do you think China is the last place to go to? China has the world's largest population and there are many Chinese dating websites set up to hook up singles, much more than Korean, Japanese, other Asian websites. I mean, go to any dating website and what percentage of the profiles do you think are Chinese?
    1
  19541. +China Driving Observations Personal wealth can also come from having the right connections, the right investments, or just simply having the right mindset of saving money. Chinese people are notoriously stingy and thrifty with our money, and we tend to make good businessmen (Westerners have compared Chinese to Jews) So who's to say Xi Jinping didn't acquire his wealth through living a simple life and saving every penny? Xi grew up during tough times (under the Cultural Revolution) when China was dirt poor, so his mindset could be similar to poor Chinese, in saving money on expenditures. Also, why should a politician be judged solely on how rich he is? Why not judge them on what they done for the country? For example, President Xi is willing to tackle the mountain of corruption within the communist party, something that previous Chinese leaders didn't dared to touch.
    1
  19542. +China Driving Observations That's a rather simplistic method of calculation, simply dividing wealth over number of years he has been a lowly paid party official. As you rise through the ranks in CCP, your pay is bound to increase, your connections become broader, your business acuity more experienced, and so on. What makes you think that someone's pay is evenly distributed his whole life?
    1
  19543. +China Driving Observations What "billion dollar fortune" are you talking about? According to most sources, President Xi Jinping's net worth is about $100 million, so where do you arrive at your billion dollar figure? From Bloomberg you say? Is this the source you are talking about? Source: China's incoming president Xi Jinping's family 'has wealth of hundreds of millions' telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/9365099/Chinas-incoming-president-Xi-Jinpings-family-has-wealth-of-hundreds-of-millions.html According to the above source, it is Xi Jinping's FAMILY that has a wealth of billions of dollars, and it's the FAMILY that owns numerous assets, stakes and other investments, including the villa. Most of the traceable fortune is held by Mr Xi's older sister, Qi Qiaoqiao, 63, her husband Deng Jiagui, 61, and her daughter Zhang Yannan, 33. No assets were traced to Mr Xi himself, his wife Peng Liyuan, or their daughter. There is also no indication that Mr Xi helped to advance his relatives' business, or of any wrongdoing by Mr Xi or his family, Bloomberg said. Did you happen to misread the news article, assuming that the billions of dollars of assets belongs to Xi Jinping alone? Those assets weren't traced to Mr Xi himself as mentioned in Bloomberg.
    1
  19544. +Alex T At first, I liked serpentza's and laowhy's initial videos about China, because they depict both the good and bad points about China in a fair light. However, over the years, they changed somewhat and the latest videos about China have all been largely negative, negative, negative. It's apparent that they don't consider China their home at all and they aren't adapting well to Chinese culture and language. I mean, they stayed in China for like what? 10 years? 15 years? I know they joined in early 2000s, but their Chinese proficiency is comparable to that of a 5-year old, and you can't have decent conversations with them about various topics in Mandarin. They continually speak English (and they encouraged their wives to speak English) and they remain fiercely independent instead of assimilating into Chinese culture. I mean, I would have nothing to say if they choose to live in America or UK, but they are living in China and yet they make little effort to adapt to Chinese culture, despite living here for a decade.
    1
  19545. Billions of dollars flow through South China Sea and majority of it belongs to China, so the government is taking addition measures to defend our lifeline that's all. static.businessinsider.sg/2016/02/02/54e66f606bb3f77c0a018299.jpg
    1
  19546.  LOSER trump 7  China's population in 1955 was 605 million. In 1960, China's population actually grew to 667 million, having increased by 62 million in 5 years. Yet you're claiming from 1958 to 1962, China's population decreased by 50 million?
    1
  19547.  LOSER trump 7  In 1995, China's population was 605 million. In 1960, China's population actually grew to 667 million, having increased by 62 million in 5 years. Yet you're claiming that from 1958 to 1962, China's population decreased by 50 million in 4 years?
    1
  19548.  LOSER trump 7  Explain how China's population increased by 62 million in 5 years from 1995-1960, if you claim that from 1958-1962, China's population decreased by 50 million. Why is China the country with the world's largest population if you claim Mao was mass murderer?
    1
  19549. Explain how China's population increased by 62 million in 5 years from 1995-1960, if you claim that from 1958-1962, China's population decreased by 50 million. Why is China the country with the world's largest population if you claim Mao was mass murderer?
    1
  19550. You can't even prove Mao's intent to murder, when those people starved to death. Also why'd China's overall population increased when you claimed millions died?
    1
  19551. Explain how China's population increased by 62 million in 5 years from 1995-1960, if you claim that from 1958-1962, China's population decreased by 50 million. Why is China the country with the world's largest population if you claim Mao was mass murderer?
    1
  19552. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it seems like the U.S is a threat to global peace and stability.
    1
  19553. Many studies have shown Chinese to be among the most diligent and intelligent of peoples worldwide. Why should Chinese people consider ourselves inferior to Westerners in any way? Westerners became powerful because of Chinese inventions like gunpowder, and they colonized other countries to plunder them of resource, genocide of native and locals, and then import slaves from Africa to do their work for them, that is how Western societies are built. Even till today, America and Australia are actually occupied territories that should be returned to Native Americans and Australian aboriginals respectively. Chinese people don't want the same thing that happened to those countries, to happen to China, and it is thanks to PLA being world's largest land army, that British, USA and Japan think twice before invading our lands like they did before.
    1
  19554. Chinese workers work hard to make all those products like smartphones, computers, laptops, appliances, electronics, clothing, toys, sneakers, etc, so that foreigners can afford them and help keep cost of living low in their countries. Think of the millions of dollars you people have saved over the years on daily living expenses, thanks to affordable Chinese goods.
    1
  19555. Shenzhen is home to the latest technologies, smartphones, cameras, gadgets, drones, Artificial Intelligence systems, robotics, automation, 5G, electric vehicles and so much more. Yet many Westerners haven't heard of Shenzhen.
    1
  19556.  @purplesoup2663  The United States has separated parents from kids, by deporting more than half a million illegal immigrant parents since 2009 (according to Washington Post) and then sending their kids into detention centres. Source: The U.S. has deported more than half a million parents since 2009 washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/09/21/this-is-what-would-happen-to-the-children-of-11-million-illegal-immigrants-if-president-trump-deported-them/
    1
  19557. "The so-called Western community is as I called it in my speech, the Empire of Lies" - Vladimir Putin
    1
  19558. 我们要继续努力～为中国创造更加美好的未来。🇨🇳 We must continue our efforts to create a better future for China. 🇨🇳
    1
  19559.  @wolfgangkranek376  Stalin is viewed favorably among many Russians. A record 70% of Russians approve of Soviet leader Josef Stalin playing a positive role in Russian history, according to a poll published by the independent Levada Center. On the other hand, Gorbachev is reviled and unpopular in Russia. In a 2021 poll, more than 70% of Russians said their country had moved in a negative direction during Gorbachev's rule.
    1
  19560.  @tonypeterson5316  China has made many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans to chart out China's direction and our future in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. Whereas in the United States for example, the U.S presidents have to step down after 4-8 years so they can only make short-term plans instead of long term plans, spanning say 10 years for America.
    1
  19561.  @tonypeterson5316  You said: "U said the reason why Xi got rid of the 2 terms policy" Did I ever said that Xi got rid of the 2 terms policy? Could you please quote me my words saying that Xi got rid of it? China's presidential term limits were abolished on March 11, 2018, when the National People's Congress, by a vote of 2,958 in favor, 2 opposed and 3 abstaining, passed a constitutional amendment that allowed the president to serve an unlimited number of 5-year terms. You said: "But the 5 years plans and 10, 20 years goal were already adopted by the Chinese government a long time ago..." Correct. China's 5-year plans have emerged since the Chairman Mao period, during which there were no term limits for the presidency. You said: "...how come all those other leaders were able to just stay in power for 2 terms (10 years) but not Xi?" During the Mao era, there were no term limits for the presidency. But between 1982 and 2018, term limits were introduced into the constitution, stipulating that the president could not serve more than two consecutive terms. Presidential term limits were abolished in 2018, without changing its powers. That's why all those other leaders stayed in power for 2 terms compared to Xi. Because the 2-year term limits were introduced between 1982 and 2018.
    1
  19562.  @tonypeterson5316  You asked: "So why were they able to follow the 2 term policy and not Xi? Can u explain to me why?" I've already answered this. Because term limits were abolished in 2018. The 5-year plans strategy existed since Chairman Mao era, during which there were no term limits for the presidency. But between 1982 and 2018, term limits were introduced into the the constitution, stipulating that the president could not serve more than two consecutive terms. Term limits were later abolished in 2018, and that's why all those leaders you mentioned followed the 2 term limit policy and not Xi. Here's the timeline of the heads of State of China and the time period they were in power: Chairman Mao Zedong (27 September 1954 – 27 April 1959) Chairman Liu Shaoqi (27 April 1959 – 31 October 1968) Acting Chairman Dong Biwu (24 February 1972 – 17 January 1975) Honorary Chairman Song Qingling (16–29 May 1981) President Li Xiannian (18 June 1983 – 8 April 1988) President Yang Shangkun (8 April 1988 – 27 March 1993) President Jiang Zemin (27 March 1993 – 15 March 2003) President Hu Jintao (15 March 2003 – 14 March 2013) President Xi Jinping (14 March 2013–present) ... Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China#List_of_heads_of_state
    1
  19563.  @tonypeterson5316  I've already explained this earlier. On March 11, 2018, the National People's Congress, by a vote of 2,958 in favor, two opposed and three abstaining, passed a constitutional amendment that allowed the president to serve an unlimited number of five-year terms. The NPC voted to restore the original constitution of having no term limits. Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China#Restoration_in_1982
    1
  19564.  @tonypeterson5316  I did not delete my first comment, it's just that YouTube censored it. Here is is again: China has made many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans to chart out China's direction and our future in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. Also, I've already explained that it was the National People's Congress that voted to abolish the presidential term limits, and the results were 2,958 in favor, two opposed and three abstaining. The NPC probably found that the term limits were detrimental to China's ability to plan 10-year, 20-year, 30-year plans, and that's why they abolished it in 2018.
    1
  19565.  @tonypeterson5316  I did not delete my first comment, it's just that YouTube blocked it. China's 5-year plan policy appeared during Chairman Mao era, back when there was no term limits for the presidency. Term limits were established between 1982 and 2018, and it was abolished when the National People's Congress with a vote of 2,958 in favor, two opposed and three abstaining. The NPC probably found that the term limits were detrimental to China's ability to plan 10-year, 20-year, 30-year plans, and that's why they abolished it in 2018.
    1
  19566.  @tonypeterson5316  China's 5-year plan policy appeared during Chairman Mao era, back when there was no term limits for the presidency. Term limits were established between 1982 and 2018, and it was abolished when the National People's Congress with a vote of 2,958 in favor, two opposed and three abstaining. The NPC probably found that the term limits were detrimental to China's ability to plan 10-year, 20-year, 30-year plans, and that's why they abolished it in 2018.
    1
  19567.  @tonypeterson5316  The NPC abolished it because China's longer term plans (i.e 20-year, 30-year, 40-year) etc, required the leader to remain in power longer than 2 terms. Like I said, China's 5-year policies were conceived during Chairman Mao era, during which there was no term limits for the presidency, so in a sense, the communist party is returning to its roots.
    1
  19568.  @tonypeterson5316  China's economy may have flourished under 2-term policy, but capitalism also introduced problems such as growing income inequality between the rich and poor in China. In order to reverse this, more power have to be given to the government in order to promote what President Xi calls Common Prosperity. Another point is that perhaps the National People's Congress discovered that the 2-term limit was inhibiting the execution of 20-year plans, 30-year plans, 40-year plans, etc, which is why the NPC voted (2,958 in favor, 2 opposed and 3 abstaining) to abolish the term limits, yet why'd you claim earlier it's President Xi that abolished the term limits, when in actuality it was put to a vote by the NPC? The other point that I've made is that China's 5-year plan polices were conceived during the Chairman Mao era, during which there were no term limits, so by abolishing the term limits, China is in fact returning to the fundamentals of how the 5-year plan policies were meant to be carried out.
    1
  19569.  @tonypeterson5316  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Do u actually believe China was doing well under Chairman Mao's" Under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. China's Life Expectancy (at birth) under Mao nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980, and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al. 1984; Coale1984; Jamison 1984; Banister 1987; Ravallion 1997; Banister and Hill 2004). Infant mortality rates under Mao was halved, and illiteracy rates nearly halved under Mao. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%. Therefore, I believe China was doing well under Chairman Mao according to the statistics gleamed from that era. But many Westerners hardly know of Mao's contributions, they only know a one-sided view of Mao that's all. Also, like I said, the 5-year plans were conceived during the Mao era, but a term limit was introduced between 1982 and 2018, and with the abolishment of term limits in 2018, China is in fact returning to the fundamentals of how the 5-year plan policies were meant to be carried out. You said: "Tell me, really, how has China become less capitalist since Xi took over?" Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why American monopolies like Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon dominate their respective industries, having eliminated the competition from other smaller American firms. This process also stifles innovation through competition. China has anti-monopoly policies cracking down on anti-competitive practices in Alibaba, Tencent, DiDi, etc, so as to "free up market space" to allow smaller Chinese firms to rise and compete with the bigger companies, while allowing innovation through competition.
    1
  19570.  @tonypeterson5316  About term limits, when a new president is elected, he/she might just start reversing the previous president's policies, and that's why the country is unable to plan long-term. Take the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) for example, and Obama had signed U.S onto the TPP in 2016. But after Trump came to power, he reversed many of Obama's policies, and withdrew the U.S from the TPP in 2017. This could be one reason why China decided to abolish term limits so that long-term plans can be carried out into fruition. Take the Belt and Road Iniative (BRI) for example, it's a long-term plan that would probably take many decades to fully realize, so can you imagine if China's leader steps down because of term limits, and the next leader just cancel the whole BRI project?
    1
  19571.  @tonypeterson5316  "神州 Shenzhou Man, u r clearly delusional if u actually think Mao did a great job." More insults. Didn't you receive my above statistics? Under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. China's Life Expectancy (at birth) under Mao nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980. Infant mortality rates under Mao was halved, and illiteracy rates nearly halved under Mao. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%. Yet you're calling me delusional just because I quote China's achievements under Mao? You never actually quoted anything to prove me wrong, instead you resorted to hurling insults against me for my views.
    1
  19572.  @tonypeterson5316  You said: "The main reason why China's population went up so much was because the civil war had ended." And just who brought the Chinese Civil War to an end? Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 that succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country, where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1914-1949) for 37 years. Back when Sun Zhongshan overthrew Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" ROC, China was fragmented into several parts, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China. In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realizing a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and together with the communists, he succeeded in what the previous KMT failed, which is the reunification of China, proclaiming the PRC in 1949. Tibet was eventually liberated and returned back to China in 1952, so if it weren't for Chairman Mao Zedong, China would most likely still be the weak and divided country ruled by warlords, fighting among ourselves instead of the strong and reunified country we are today. You said: "I am not anti Mao or anything, I just think he had failed running China's economy." You clearly are anti-Mao. All I did was list statistics indicating China nearly doubling in population, nearly doubling in life expectancy, nearly halving adult illiteracy rates, under Mao Zedong, and your response was to label me "delusional" then why pretend that you're not anti-Mao when you clearly are? You said: "US and Europe all have anti trust laws to prevent monopoly." Those anti trust laws in US and Europe do not work to curb monopolies, that's why American monopolies like Apple, Google, Amazon, Facebook, dominate their respective industries, having eliminated the competition from smaller American firms. You said: "Do u actually think Tencent and Alibaba are any different?" Nope, but at least China's government is doing it's best to crack down on anti-competitive practices in China, targeting Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, and so on. Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone brands like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Vivo, Lenovo, Realme, and so on. Top 10 Mobile Phone Brands in World 2022 Rank 1. Samsung (South Korean) Rank 2. Apple (American) Rank 3. Xiaomi (Chinese) Rank 4. Oppo (Chinese) Rank 5. Vivo (Chinese) Rank 6. Realme (Chinese) Rank 7. Motorola Mobility (Lenovo) (Chinese) Rank 8. Huawei (Chinese) Rank 9. Transsion (Tecno, Itel) (Chinese) Rank 10. Honor (Chinese) ... Source:mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html You said: "The fact is, if it wasn't for Deng's acceptance of Capitalism's " I've already acknowledged it, I just pointed out that Deng's policies also lead to increased income inequality between the rich and the poor, so President Xi is attempting to correct the ills of capitalism by promoting common prosperity. You said: "I mean, can u actually name one pure socialist country that was actually successful, economically?" Vietnam (aka The Socialist Republic of Vietnam) is rather successful economically for a socialist country.
    1
  19573.  @tonypeterson5316  "神州 Shenzhou What kind of excuse it that? So if a Chinese leader's goal is to make China's GDP 5 times bigger than America's, then he can stay in power for as long as he want? 😂" If said Chinese leader has demonstrated competence and is able to successfully deliver upon his promises to the people, then I see no reason why he couldn't be allowed to stay in power in order to maximize the benefits he'll bring to China. I mean, competent leaders are hard to come by. Why should a clearly competent leader, be forced to step down because of term limits? Why not let a competent leader continue leading and delivering? This is a continuation of the Chinese political philosophy of the Mandate of Heaven (天命 "Heaven's Will") It basically means that a competent leader is allowed to remain in power, while an incompetent leader will eventually be overthrown through rebellion. If a rebellion was successful, it meant the leader lost the Mandate of Heaven, but if a rebellion fails and was crushed , it meant the leader retained the mandate. (A point to note is that there are no term limits in this Chinese political philosophy.) You said: "With regards to the TPP issue that u mentioned, I think it's very unreasonable to use that as an example for China." Could you elaborate why you think that is so? The TPP issue is an example of a potentially long-term policy that was derailed due to Obama having to step down (because of term limits) and Trump coming into power and reversing Obama's policies. Can you imagine the same scenario happening in China with the Belt and Road Initiative being derailed because of a change in leadership?
    1
  19574.  @tonypeterson5316  "神州 Shenzhou What kind of excuse it that? So if a Chinese leader's goal is to make China's GDP 5 times bigger than America's, then he can stay in power for as long as he want? 😂" If said Chinese leader has demonstrated competence and is able to successfully deliver upon his promises to the people, then I see no reason why he couldn't be allowed to stay in power in order to maximize the benefits he'll bring to China. I mean, competent leaders are hard to come by. Why should a clearly competent leader, be forced to step down because of term limits? Why not let a competent leader continue leading and delivering? You said: "With regards to the TPP issue that u mentioned, I think it's very unreasonable to use that as an example for China." Could you elaborate why you think that is so? The TPP issue is an example of a potentially long-term policy that was derailed due to Obama having to step down (because of term limits) and Trump coming into power and reversing Obama's policies. Can you imagine the same scenario happening in China with the Belt and Road Initiative being derailed because of a change in leadership?
    1
  19575.  @tonypeterson5316  You said: "The way how China picks its leader is very different from America." Of course. China is a meritocracy where officials who are able to deliver progress and development get promoted on the basis of merit, while getting demoted/penalized if they fail to deliver. This stems from the Chinese imperial examinations of the past (China literally invented exams). President Xi Jinping has at least 30-40 years of political experience under his belt, having accumulating the experience while governing different provinces of China. This is why many Chinese feel that Xi is qualified and competent enough to be China's leader. On the other hand, Donald Trump was elected in 2016 even though Trump had zero political experience, and his path to power was based on harnessing populism. It happened once in American politics, therefore it can happen again. Joe Biden was elected for the simple reason that Biden is not Trump, that's all. Who knows, in 2024 if Biden doesn't win his reelection, we might see the return of Trump (or another Trump-like figure). But the two countries system are clearly different, and I don't see how China should copy U.S system. China should pursue a form of government that best matches China's political philosophy, not just blindly adopt Western-style democracy, because Westerners say so. You said: "USA is different, their leaders are elected by the voters, and they have two different parties, that's why they will encounter situations like that." That's why U.S system is not suitable for China, because China would not be able to carry out 20-year, 30-year, 40-year plans if our leaders can just switch like that. You said: "So what if the BRI project takes more than 100 years to complete? Does that mean Xi should stay in power until he dies?" If Xi is able to continue to deliver on his promises, then why can't he remain in power? I've elaborated on this point plenty of times already, but it just seems that you cannot accept an alternative point of view that differs from yours. You said: "Honestly, all he needs to do is to find a successor that will follow the same path as him." Perhaps he will in time, but right now is not the right time to appoint a successor. His successor should be able to understand Xi's political philosophy as to be able to emulate it, while possibly introduce necessary changes in the future if new challenges are faced.
    1
  19576.  @tonypeterson5316  "神州 Shenzhou Increase in population is an achievement? Are u really that desperate?" More of your incessant questions and insults? It's more than just the nearly doubling of China's population, it's the nearly doubling in China's life expectancy at birth under Mao, it's the cutting of China's adult illiteracy rate to half. But it appears that you're simply unable to accept any of Mao's contributions to China, so why pretend that you're not anti-Mao when you clearly are? You said: "So are u saying Xi is doing horrible because the population growth had slowed dramatically?" No, I never said that! All I did was state the fact that under Chairman Mao Zedong, China's population nearly doubled, life expectancy nearly doubled, etc, how did that morph to become Xi is doing horrible because of population growth slowing? Also, China's population is still increasing even as we speak, from 1.412 billion (2021) to 1.452 (2022) You said: "How can those be "achievements" if the economy was disastrous?" Because at the very least, China's life expectancy was nearly doubling, it meant that the quality of life was improving in China, how is it not an achievement? Infant Mortality rate was plummeting and adult illiteracy nearly halved from 80% to 42% under Mao. Also, China's economy was still growing during period under Mao Zedong. You said: "Can u prove to me that China's economy was doing well at that time?" More of your endless questions for me to answer. Here's statistics for China's Historical GDP under Mao (from 1952 - 1980) Year: GDP in USD 1952: 30.55 billion 1953: 31.66 billion 1954: 33.02 billion 1955: 35.01 billion 1956: 39.58 billion ... ... 1977: 174.94 billion 1978: 218.5 billion 1979: 263.7 billion 1980: 306.17 billion ... Source: Historical GDP of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_GDP_of_China Therefore, China's GDP grew from 30 billion in 1952 to 300 billion in 1980 while under Mao Zedong.
    1
  19577.  @tonypeterson5316  You said: "Why the hell did they impose the "1 child policy" if things were doing so great?" More of your vulgarities and endless questions. The One Child Policy was introduced because China's population was growing at a rate that could potentially threaten China's ability to sustain such a huge population growth. It is precisely because the quality of life in China was increasing that's why population control measures were needed at that time. You said: "Are u telling me the "Great Chinese Famine" from 1959 to 1961 was an achievement?" The Great Chinese Famine from 1959 to 1961 was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong himself couldn't control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. You said: "Do u prefer seeing China to go back to Mao's period?" Given that China today has immensely more wealth than we had during Mao's period, it would be a step in the right direction if President Xi follows some of Mao's principles to help tackle the growing income inequality and to perhaps redistribute China's prosperity more evenly to the less developed regions of China. President Xi even praised Mao in his Xi Jinping Thought. In his 2013 speech, Xi argued it is "Marxism–Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought that guided the Chinese people out of the darkness of that long night and established a New China." And, as to the future, "the consolidation and development of the socialist system will require its own long period of history... it will require the tireless struggle of generations, up to ten generations." Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Xi_Jinping_Thought#Socialism_with_Chinese_characteristics You said: "If that's not being delusional I dunno what is. That is not an insult, it's just honesty." It's not me being delusional, it's you being unable to accept an alternative point of view. I have been patiently answering your questions to the best of my ability, citing data where necessarily and presenting it to you in a rational manner. However, your response was to hurl verbal insults against me for my views, repeatedly calling me delusional instead of refuting my points.
    1
  19578.  @tonypeterson5316  More of you incessant questions and verbal insults. I've been patiently answering your questions to the best of my ability, citing data where necessarily and presenting it to you in a rational manner, but in return, you resort to insults such as repeatedly calling me delusion (just because my views differ from yours) then who is the one being unreasonable here?
    1
  19579.  @tonypeterson5316  You said: "The population growth was not the result of its economy, so it's not an achievement." But earlier you said: "The main reason why China's population went up so much was because the civil war had ended." so it's the end to the civil war that resulted in China's population boom. You said: "Besides, he doesn't even deserve all the credit for ending the civil war." Why not? Why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan island? During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage, while the KMT had massive wealth (heavily taxed from peasants) superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China.
    1
  19580.  @tonypeterson5316  You said: "The KMT was defeated because they had already lost many troops in the war against the Japanese." After the Japanese surrendered in 1945, the KMT had a strength of 2 million (regular), 2.3 million (militia) (June 1946). Whereas the communists had a strength of 1.2 million (regular), 2.6 million (militia) (July 1945) according to this source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Civil_War So whichever way you look at it, the KMT still outnumber the communists even after 1945. And mind you, this was after the Japanese had surrendered at the end of WWII, so there was no more fighting the Japanese. Yet despite this numerical superiority, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Taiwan. Did you know that when the KMT fled the mainland, the KMT leader Chiang kai-shek transferred China's gold reserves from Shanghai to Taipei? This injection of capital helped kickstart Taiwan's economy, while leaving the mainland in ruins after years of civil strife. This is one reason why mainland China was dirt-poor at the beginning, because of civil strife and plundering of China's resources. Estimates of how much was moved differ between sources, ranging from between 113.6 and 115.2 tons. The _Archives of Gold published in 2010 by Dr. Wu Sing-yung outlines how his father (head of finance for the KMT government) helped to mastermind the operation that saw more than 4 million taels of gold moved from Shanghai to Taiwan. One tael is 37.2 grams._ Source: How One Man Took China’s Gold etf.com/sections/features-and-news/5210-how-one-man-took-chinas-gold You said: "I just said I am not anti Mao, so do u want me to be anti Mao? 😂" Your words clearly do not correspond with your claim that you're not anti-Mao. I mean, you've constantly dismissing Mao's contributions, and disregarding them as "achievements" then what more needs to be said about your clearly anti-Mao stance? It was Mao Zedong that succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country. Not even the previous KMT administration achieved the degree of reunification of China that the communists did under Mao, how is this not an achievement? If not for Mao Zedong, China today would most likely still be ruled by warlords controlling various parts of China, instead of the strong and reunified country we are today. You said: "Ppl like u are just making a fool out of yourself by turning Mao into a cult." Look, I've been giving reasons and elaborating upon my position, quoting various data, statistics, and various other figures to support my arguments where possible, yet all you've done is dismiss my viewpoint, repeatedly calling me "delusional" just because my views happen to differ from yours. Who is the one truly making a fool out of himself here?
    1
  19581. ​ @tonypeterson5316  You said: "神州 Shenzhou U r starting to make no sense at all. U r showing me a stat that clearly proves China's economy started to do much better," Because you asked "Can u prove to me that China's economy was doing well at that time?" and that's precisely what I did. I showed that under Mao Zedong, China's GDP grew. Even if you exclude Mao's death in 1976, you cannot change the fact that China's GDP still grew from 30 billion in 1952 to 174.94 billion by 1977. So I have answered your question and provided evidence that that China's economy was doing well at that time. But now instead you're resorting to moving the goal post even after I've scored a goal? You said: "What kind of logic do u have? If u think population growth is an achievement, then it means low population growth is a not a good thing, right?" China's population increased under President Xi from 1.372 billion in 2014 to 1.452 in 2022. Also, you were clearly asking me about Mao Zedong's achievements, then how did that morph to become Xi is doing horrible because of population growth slowing?
    1
  19582.  @tonypeterson5316  "神州 Shenzhou Didn't I just tell u that the KMT had lost many of its troops because of the war against the Japanese?" Didn't I proved to you that after WWII, the KMT had a strength of 2 million (regular), 2.3 million (militia) (June 1946), whereas the communists had a strength of 1.2 million (regular), 2.6 million (militia) (July 1945)? So whichever way you look at it, the KMT still outnumbered the communists, and yet despite numerical superiority, the KMT still lost the mainland and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates the KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland. You said: "Also, many ppl died over the war, so of course Mao doesn't deserve all the credit." Mao Zedong led the communists to put an end to the Civil War, then why can't credit be given to him where credit is due? If not for Mao, China would still be in civil strife, fighting among ourselves instead of the unified country we are today, this achievement was China's first step to rebuilding our ruined country after the war. You said: "But even if he did, it still doesn't prove that his economic model had worked!" I have previously proved it, citing a source indicating China's GDP grew from 30 billion to 174 billion under Mao. The evidence is staring you in the face, but due to your blatantly anti-Mao stance, you've been constantly dismissing Mao's achievements all this time, so why pretend that you're not anti-Mao when you clearly are?
    1
  19583.  @tonypeterson5316  Seriously, all you seem to do is ask an endless stream of questions, one after another, while demanding proof from me. But when I answer your incessant questions with data and statistics, all I get is verbal insults from you, repeatedly calling me "delusional" when my views differ from yours, all the while quoting no evidence to back up your views. Who is the one making a fool of himself here?
    1
  19584.  @tonypeterson5316  "神州 Shenzhou Dude, u thought Mao was the leader of China from 1977 to 1980, clearly proves how little u know about the real Chinese history." Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms only began in the late 1970s, so technically China was still under Mao's policies until 1980 at the very least. Yet it is undeniable that China's GDP grew under Mao from 30 billion in 1953 to 300 billion in 1980 , but it's apparent that you refuse to admit it, because you're blatantly anti-Mao in your views. Anyone who presents an alternative view or brings up Mao's contributions to China is automatically considered "delusional" by you, then who is the one making a fool of himself here? You said: "Like I said earlier, I never denied Mao's warfare capability, it's his economic model that had failed." Remember, if not for Mao's warfare capability resulting in putting an end to the civil war, it's unlikely that economic policies could continue if China was constantly in civil strife. Ending the civil war was also what lead to China's population nearly doubling, life expectancy nearly doubling, adult illiteracy halving, and so on. You said: "But some how u still won't admit it, clearly proves u r just turning him into a cult." What sort of cultist explains his stance using rational logic, citing data and statistics? On the other hand, the one who resorts to verbal insults, calling others delusional just for harboring a different point of view, while dismissing anything that doesn't fit his narrative, while still proclaiming not to be anti-Mao, isn't such behavior typical of a cultist? You said: "Just copy and paste things out of Wikipedia doesn't make u a knowledgable person." Look, you're the one asking for proof here, yet when I cite actual proof, you dismiss them and claim it doesn't make one knowledgeable? Who is the one making a fool of himself here?
    1
  19585.  @tonypeterson5316  "神州 Shenzhou Wait, did Taiwan have "1 child policy", "the great famine", and "Cultural Revolution"? 🤔" Taiwan's population is but a fraction of mainland China, of course the problems they encounter will be different from that of the mainland. Yet you're just lumping mainland problems onto Taiwan? What sort of discussion is this? You said: "How the heck am I an anti-Maoist if I was only criticizing his economic failure?" You've been repeatedly dismissing Mao's achievements whenever I bring them up, such as China's population doubling, life expectancy doubling, infant mortality halving, adult illiteracy rate halving under Mao. Even regarding Mao's economic policy, I've previously shown that China's GDP grew from 30 billion in 1952 to 300 billion in 1980 (Deng's economic reforms only began in late 1970s). So the statistical proof is right here. You said: "If u can't even face this reality then u r just being delusional." More insults, that's all you know how to do. No data, no statistics, only verbal abuses against others who take a different view from yours. You said: "He's not a cult, he's a human." Which cult member would elaborate his upon stance using data, statistics, logic and reasoning? On the other hand, a cult member would start calling others "delusional" for taking a different view, while citing no evidence to back up his stance.
    1
  19586.  @tonypeterson5316  I mean, are you actually Chinese for crying out loud? Then why is it that you harbor such vehement hatred towards the founding father of the People's Republic of China? Instead of listening to reason and logic, looking at actual data and statistics, you've resorted to labeling others as delusional just for taking a different point of view? Who was it that imparted such a feeling of hatred in you?
    1
  19587.  @tonypeterson5316  Deng's economic policies began on December 18, 1978, that's basically the end of the year itself. The point is that you asked: "Can u prove to me that China's economy was doing well at that time?" and I've already answered it, showing that China's GDP grew from 30 billion in 1952 to 300 billion in 1980. Yet you keep accusing me of being unable to accept the fact, when the fact remains that China's GDP grew?
    1
  19588.  @tonypeterson5316  Hatred because whenever I bring up Mao's achievements (population, life expectancy, literacy rates) I was met with insults from you, labeling me delusional or a cult member. Which cult member would be so rational as to explain his stance through the use of data, statistics, logic and reasoning? I've already proven that China's GDP grew from 30 billion in 1953 to 300 billion in 1980, yet you are the one denying reality here. "U are the one that thought he was still alive in 1980, don't need to cry about it." Mao's policies were still in effect before the Deng's economic policies beginning in late 1970s.
    1
  19589.  @tonypeterson5316  Deng's economic policies started on December 1978 (the last month of that year), and the fact remains that China's GDP grew from 30 billion to 300 billion, yet you're too blinded by hatred of Mao to even admit this. Are you even a Chinese yourself? Why the intense hatred for something that doesn't even concern you or your country?
    1
  19590.  @tonypeterson5316  You display the typical ignorance of Mao Zedong commonly associated with Westerners whenever the topic of Mao is brought up. Why don't you do some research as to how life was really like under Mao? Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 that succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country, where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1914-1949) for 37 years. This feat alone already makes his contribution to China of the utmost importance, for if without it, China would most likely still be a weak and divided country ruled by various warlords governing different parts of China, instead of the strong, reunified country we are today. It's apparent that you severely underestimate the enormity of Mao's contribution as the founding father alone.
    1
  19591.  @tonypeterson5316  "神州 Shenzhou Didn't I say Mao was capable in warfare combat? That's not a praise?" No, you said: "Besides, he (Mao) doesn't even deserve all the credit for ending the civil war." and "so of course Mao doesn't deserve all the credit." are clearly examples of you refusing to give credit to Mao where credit is due. You said: "Just because I am not as delusional as u, that doesn't mean I hate him." It seems that insults is the only thing you are capable of, towards people who hold a different point of view. And it's apparent from your words that you hate Mao, why pretend you aren't anti-Mao when you clearly are? You said: "But even if he defeated the KMT party, that only benefited him and the party, not really the country." Mao Zedong and the communists chasing KMT out of the mainland to Taiwan is what put an end to the civil war so how does that not benefit the country? Mao and the communists ended decades of civil strife, so that China can finally begin picking up the pieces of our ruined homeland, how is that not a benefit? You said: "The KMT party was the one that defeated the Qing government and moved the country forward." The communists were the ones who defeated the KMT in the mainland and put an end to the civil war and moved the country forward. If not for Mao, China under the KMT would most likely still under civil strife, ruled by various warlords governing different parts of our country, how is that "moving the country forward?" You said: "That's a much bigger achievement!" The reunification of China under Mao and the ending of the civil war in the mainland is a far bigger achievement than the what the KMT did. KMT tried for 37 years (1912-1949) but they were unsuccessful in reunifying China and putting an end to the civil strife.
    1
  19592.  @tonypeterson5316  You said: "They were the ones fighting the Japanese, not Mao nor his party." Actually, when the Japanese invaded Manchuria in 1931, the KMT leader, Generalissimo Chiang kai-Shek, was reluctant to meet the invaders head-on, instead he continued purging communists (our fellow Chinese brethren) instead of repelling the foreign invaders. Until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap Chiang in order to force the KMT to switch its priority to fighting the Japanese. This incident is known as the Xi'an Incident (西安事变) Source: Xi'an Incident wikipedia.org/wiki/Xi%27an_Incident Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was thanks to communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release. Only then was Chiang willing to form a united front with the communists against the Japanese invaders. You said: "Sun Yat-Sen is the real father of China, Mao is the father of CPC." Dr Sun Zhongshan is the founding father of the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949), while Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳. Both figures are respected as the fathers of modern China among Chinese people, but like I said, Mao's achievements include putting an end to the decades long civil strife, in which even the KMT administration were unable to achieve, and finally reunifying our divided country. But because you are clearly anti-Mao in your views, you simply refuse to give credit to Mao where credit is due. You said: "U r clearly brainwashed by the cult of Mao, it's getting hilarious." I've provided data and statistics to support my stance, whereas you've constantly dismissed my sources, called me "delusional" (and now "brainwashed") just because my views happen to differ from yours. You said: "Every economist knows that it was Deng's reform that opened up the Chinese market and lifted millions out of poverty." Yes, I've never denied that, I clearly said earlier that China's economy flourished under 2-term policy, but capitalism also introduced problems such as growing income inequality between the rich and poor in China. But at the same time, I was pointing out China's achievements under Mao, such as putting an end to civil strife, which paved the war for China's economic recovery after the horrors of war. You said: "Even Xi is using this model instead of Mao's." Indeed. But President Xi also praised Mao in his Xi Jinping Thought. In his 2013 speech, Xi argued it is "Marxism–Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought that guided the Chinese people out of the darkness of that long night and established a New China." And, as to the future, "the consolidation and development of the socialist system will require its own long period of history... it will require the tireless struggle of generations, up to ten generations." ... Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Xi_Jinping_Thought#Socialism_with_Chinese_characteristics
    1
  19593.  @tonypeterson5316  "神州 Shenzhou U really enjoy Wikipedia don't u? Why don't u read this instead:" Didn't you said earlier that (quoting your words) "Just copy and paste things out of Wikipedia doesn't make u a knowledgable person." yet now you're resorting to doing the same? And mind you, I quoted Wikipedia because you asked for proof, when you said: "Can u prove to me that China's economy was doing well at that time?" Also, even in your source, it admits that China's economy was growing under Mao Zedong, it said: "From 1950 to 1973, Chinese real GDP per capita grew at a rate of 2.9% per year on average,". And as I said earlier, under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Under Mao, China's Life Expectancy (at birth) nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980, and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al. 1984; Coale1984; Jamison 1984; Banister 1987; Ravallion 1997; Banister and Hill 2004). Infant mortality rates under Mao was halved, and Mao’s Chinese literacy program resulted in illiteracy rates being halved. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%, and this feat has been named ‘The Single Greatest Educational Effort in Human History’ according to Language Magazine. Source:languagemagazine.com/the-single-greatest-educational-effort-in-human-history/
    1
  19594.  @tonypeterson5316  Look, all that you've basically done is ask an endless volumes of questions, one after another. I've taken the time to answer you questions, citing data and statistics to prove my point, but you just sudden resort to labeling me delusional just for presenting an opposing point of view. Yet the irony is that you claim that you're not anti-Mao, when it's evident from your words that you clearly are, so why pretend that you're not anti-Mao? Even your earlier points about term limits, I've argued that the 5-year plans strategy were conceived during Chairman Mao era, during which there was no term limits. Term limits were introduced in 1982 but were abolished in 2018, and I've listed reasons why the government voted to abolish it. But again, you simply can't wrap your mind around a different point of view, so you started bringing up Mao Zedong era to give voice to your anti-Mao stance. Also, President Xi is only entering his 3rd term, whereas Angela Merkel served a 4th and would have probably gone on to serve a 5th if she didn't voluntarily withdrew as a candidate in the next German election. Such long-serving leaders accumulate a wealth of political experience over the years, and it would be a shame if such competent leaders were forced to step down because of term limits. But from your point of view, you said: "It just makes completely no sense not to have term limits. It's common sense. Being delusional won't get u no where." so you are you calling the Germans delusional for not having term limits?
    1
  19595.  @tonypeterson5316  "神州 Shenzhou So where was Mao and his army when the Japanese invaded?" Like I said earlier, when the Japanese invaded Manchuria, the KMT leader Chiang kai-shek did not meet the invaders head-on, instead he continued purging communists and so Mao Zedong and the communists were busy trying to survive extinction through tactical retreats such as the Long March. Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_March You said: "Every "real" history book, not those TV dramas made by the CPC, and historians will tell u that it was the KMT that fought against the Japanese, not the Communist." The communists had smaller forces than the Japanese, so they resorted to tactics that allow a smaller force to take on a larger force, such as guerrilla tactics. Many KMT Generals and officers rarely take the lead, instead they actively escape and led ordinary KMT soldiers die for them. Whereas the Communist generals often led the charge and many have sustained grievous injuries. There are 12 communist generals missing an arm in CPC: He Bingyan(贺炳炎), Peng Shaohui(彭绍辉), Yu Qiuli(余秋里), Yan Fusheng(晏福生), Zhuo Qi(左齐), Zhu Shengda(朱声达), Su Lu(苏鲁), Chen Bo(陈波), Peng Shousheng(彭寿生), Peng Qingyun(彭清云), Tong Yansheng(童炎生), Liao Zhengguo(廖政国). There's 1 communist general with broken feet: Zhong Chibing(钟赤兵). Another *7 communist generals and 1 Marshal are missing one eye*: Liu Bocheng(刘伯承), Li Zuopeng(李作鹏), Zhou Chunquan(周纯全), Zhao Rong(赵熔), Xu Binzhou(徐斌洲), Shi Zhiben(石志本), He Qingji(贺庆积), Li Wenqing(李文清) These are the serious scars suffered by communist leaders, but if you look at the KMT generals, they all have their eyes and limbs intact, despite "fighting" the Japanese for 8 years longer.
    1
  19596.  @tonypeterson5316  You said: "So why doesn't Xi adopt Mao's economic model then?" Xi is adopting certain aspects, such as abolishing the term limits. During the Mao era, there were no term limits for the presidency, and term limits were introduced in 1982 and abolished in 2018. This shows that the communist party is returning to how the 5-year plans policy were originally conceived where there were no term limits in place, so isn't this a return to one aspect of Mao Zedong era? You said: "Clearly proves Mao's economic model had flaws..." Of course every economic model has flaws, just like Deng Xiaoping's economic model has resulted in capitalism creating unequal growth, resulting in a widening gap between the rich and the poor. President Xi Jinping is attempting to rectify the problem of inequality through his "Common Prosperity" policy. But even your source admits that "From 1950 to 1973, Chinese real GDP per capita grew at a rate of 2.9% per year on average," so clearly there was economic growth while under Mao Zedong era. "...but brainwashed ppl like u just won't admit it because u r treating Mao like a god or something, that's what I meant by "cult". No, your question was (and I quote your words): "Can u prove to me that China's economy was doing well at that time?" and we've already answered it with me showing that China's GDP grew from 30.55 billion in 1952 to at least 74.94 billion in 1977 (before Deng's economic policies in 1978). Even your source admits that "From 1950 to 1973, Chinese real GDP per capita grew at a rate of 2.9% per year on average," I've also pointed out various achievements by Chairman Mao, such as China's population nearly doubling in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. China's Life Expectancy (at birth) under Mao nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980, and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al. 1984; Coale1984; Jamison 1984; Banister 1987; Ravallion 1997; Banister and Hill 2004). Under Mao, infant mortality rates plunged from 195 deaths per thousand births in 1950 to 72 deaths per thousand in 1975. Mao’s Chinese literacy program has been called ‘The Single Greatest Educational Effort in Human History’ according to Language Magazine. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%. But you just ignored Mao's achievements, calling me "delusional" and "brainwashed" when I quote statistics to support my argument. Yet you claim that you're not anti-Mao when all your comments say the opposite, then who is the cult member here?
    1
  19597.  @tonypeterson5316  You said: "historians will tell u that it was the KMT that fought against the Japanese, not the Communist." Chiang kai-shek even served in the Imperial Japanese Army for 2 years, from 1909-1911, which could be one reason why he was reluctant to fight the Japanese. Chiang expelled Communists from the KMT ranks, and the removal of Communists from within the ranks allowed him free reign to give himself what amounted to dictatorial power over much of China. His own generals kidnapped him during the Xi'an Incident when he refused to form an alliance with the communists to repel the Japanese. It was thanks to communist goodwill who saved Chiang's leadership by negotiating for his release in Xi'an. Although the Communist General Mao was responsible for much of the damage inflicted upon the Japanese, it was Chiang who got the credit mainly from Britain and the US. Source: 11 Things You Should Know About Chiang Kai-shek theculturetrip.com/asia/taiwan/articles/11-things-know-chiang-kai-shek/ Chiang's Western friends later abandoned him when civil war broke out in China. After a long campaign against both the Japanese and the Germans, the US and Britain were reluctant to get involved in a civil war, preferring instead to encourage a peace deal between the two sides. Chiang fled the mainland to Taiwan, where he declared martial law on the island for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. During this period, Chiang's power was absolute and he suppressed local culture in what's known as the ‘White Terror’, imprisoning 140,000 people in Taiwan. These people were taken captive for their alleged opposition to the KMT. At this time, anyone openly criticizing the ruling party was deemed a Communist sympathizer. Chiang held the Taiwan Presidency for 25 years. Many would argue that Chiang should have stepped down long before his death, but he remained in power for a quarter of a century. In fact, the constitution only allowed for two terms in power, but with martial law as his excuse, Chiang could rule indefinitely.
    1
  19598.  @tonypeterson5316  Abolishing term limit is one aspect of the Mao's economic model, because it allows our leaders to carry out 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans into fruition. Also, every economic model has flaws, but even your source admitted that "From 1950 to 1973, Chinese real GDP per capita grew at a rate of 2.9% per year on average," so clearly there was economic growth while under Mao Zedong era. You said: "Maybe that's why there was a famine?" The Great Chinese Famine was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Mao himself couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. You said: "Then he decided to impose the "one child" policy? " The One-Child Policy was implemented in 1980, after Mao's death in 1976, so how is the One Child Policy Mao's doing? The policy was actually implemented because China's population was booming and there were fears that there was insufficient resources to support such a huge population. You said: " USA was around $2,349, that's almost 44 times more than China's." The United States is a developed country, while China is still a developing country, of course the GDP per capita would be different between developed and developing countries, so why are you comparing them? If you want a comparison, look at the world's 2nd most populous country, India, and their GDP per capita was Rs 265 in 1950s. You said: "Do u actually think that was a success? Use ur head." Even your source said: "From 1950 to 1973, Chinese real GDP per capita grew at a rate of 2.9% per year on average," yet you resort to insulting people just for answering your earlier question of "Can u prove to me that China's economy was doing well at that time?" You said: "During that period, him and his Red Army went around and arrested multiple communist members and destroyed many Chinese traditions and its heritage." Chinese traditions that were rooted in superstition and harmful were removed. For example, during the Cultural Revolution, many peasants were allowed access to education. Literacy rates grew in the countryside, and even women were granted education, despite the Chinese tradition of not sending girls to school. "Women hold up half the sky" which is one of Mao's quotes, and women were featured prominently in the forefront among Mao era posters, working alongside their male colleagues. You said: "If u think he is a god and his economic model was great, then u r clearly brainwashed by his "cult" image, so good luck with that👍There's nothing that can change ur delusional mind." I pointed out statistics of how under Mao, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, our infant mortality rates plummeted, and so on. I support my argument with statistics, whereas if someone offers an argument that differs from yours, you label them "delusional" and "brainwashed"? Then it appears that you've been taught to "demonize" Mao Zedong that's all, and simply dismiss all his achievements, yet why do you proclaim that you're not anti-Mao? It just boggles the mind.
    1
  19599.  @tonypeterson5316  "神州 Shenzhou Why are u telling me stories about Chiang?" Because you've repeatedly mentioned that the KMT fought the Japanese, while claiming the communists didn't. Yet I've cited several communist generals who sustained grievous injuries, missing an eye or an arm, yet all the KMT Generals have their eyes and limbs intact, yet you just claim you don't know what Mao and the communists were doing? You said: "The Japanese haven't yet invaded China during 1909 - 1911." That was the period when Chiang kai-shek served in the Imperial Japanese Army, which could be one reason why he was reluctant to fight the Japanese. You said: "Dunno what the hell Mao and the Communist were doing at that time" The Communist Party of China was founded in 1921, that's before 1909-1911. It's just apparent that you're anti-Mao then why all this pretense of claiming that you're not? The fact remains that the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lost the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan, and Chairman Mao Zedong and the communists succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous KMT administration failed to achieve. If not for Mao, China today would most likely still be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves instead of the strong and unified country today. This feat alone is already Mao's crowning achievement, I cannot stress how important it was that Mao put an end to decades of civil strife in the mainland. But you've been conditioned to "demonize" any achievements made by Mao Zedong that's all, that's why you continually ignore China's population doubling, our life expectancy doubling, our literacy rates doubling, our infant mortality rates plummeting and so on. That's why you're close minded to other points of views, and you deem such views as "delusional" and "brainwashed".
    1
  19600. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19601. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19602. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  19603. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19604. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.....
    1
  19605. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19606. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  19607. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  19608. The best course of action to end the war is for Ukrainian President Zelenskyy to surrender Ukraine. It's apparent by now that NATO isn't going to send troops to defend Ukraine. Ukraine's application to join NATO is unlikely to be successful, because it would mean NATO is obliged to send reinforcements to defend Ukraine if it were a member, so I just can't see that happening. By refusing to surrender, Zelenskyy is only prolonging the war, and by arming civilians with rifles and rocket launchers, Zelenskyy is trying to maximise the civilian casualties.
    1
  19609. America's motive for investing in Africa is to counter China's rise.
    1
  19610. China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  19611.  @vibe5235  Why don't India settle their border dispute with Nepal instead of starting another with China? Nepalese policemen open fired and killed 1 Indian near Bihar over India-Nepal border dispute. Video: 1 Indian killed, 4 injured after Nepal police fired near border area with Bihar youtu.be/SFW4-ViJ0_o
    1
  19612.  @vibe5235  Don't you Indians complain incessantly about your so-called "Pakistan Occupied Kashmir"? Why don't India wrest Kashmir from Pakistan instead of talking so much about so-called POK?
    1
  19613.  @raymondhoffman3587  As for the "correcting of a groups beliefs and values," that basically describes the subservient "colonial mentality" that's a remnant of colonial rule, that's still present in the minds of many (but not all) previously colonized people. Even though colonies has since physically decolonized, the "decolonization of the mind" hasn't been completed, and more time is needed to reverse the mental programming that colonizers impart onto its colonies.
    1
  19614.  @storage4539  Actually, if you read Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條) it states that Beijing reserves the right to appoint the Hong Kong Chief Executive in light of the actual situation in Hong Kong. "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government (aka Beijing). The method for selecting the Chief Executive shall be specified in the light of the actual situation in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and in accordance with the principle of gradual and orderly progress." - Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45
    1
  19615.  @storage4539  I've already stated many times that there were 0 deaths by the HKPF during the 2019 Hong Kong protests, demonstrating the incredible restraint of the HKPF, yet you repeatedly claimed the HKPF were dehumanizing the protestors? Then why were there 0 deaths by the HKPF? Look to the deaths of African Americans like George Floyd, Ahmaud Abbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks at the hands of American police and this is a clear example of American cops dehumanizing the people. Even in the case of the Shenzhen Police, Cheng is still alive, unlike George Floyd and the others. You said: "And you? oh, the Shenzhen woman is alive." You know who's the real one dehumanizing others? It's you. I've notice you never actually referred to the Shenzhen woman by name in the first place. In fact, neither have you brought up the names of the African Americans getting shot/killed by the U.S police, then aren't you the one seemingly dehumanizing people here?
    1
  19616.  @storage4539  "神州 Shenzhou Did you share an article from some westerner on 0 deaths on Tiananmen Square before?" Yes. According to Gregory Clark's article: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies, Nothing Happened inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    1
  19617.  @storage4539  Yes. According to Gregory Clark's article: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies, Nothing Happened inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    1
  19618.  @storage4539  Check out Gregory Clark's article: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies.
    1
  19619. But can you do it at competitive pricing as are Made in China goods? Chinese workers work hard to make smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances toys, clothing, sneakers, etc, cheap so that inflation in America is kept to minimum and the cost of living in America is lower than it should be. Think of the millions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursuits like cars, housing, luxury brands, or essentials like school fees, doctor's fees, tuition fees, rent, etc.
    1
  19620. @Patrick Henry American workers often complain about Chinese workers "stealing their jobs" then consider this simple question: Are American workers willing to work for the same low pay as Chinese workers? If not, then prices of Made in America goods will increase as compared to Made in China goods. That's why your American companies outsourced its manufacturing jobs to halfway across the globe to low wage countries like China and Vietnam.
    1
  19621.  @Saint696Anger  If you spent money on something that lasts so long, then American workers aren't earning any further revenue from you. Besides, I thought most Americans love the everyday low prices at Walmart, so you must be the odd individual here. Is your phone, computer or device made in China by perchance?
    1
  19622.  @Saint696Anger  Besides automation and AI, China is also home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight 神威·太湖之光 and Tianhe-2 天河-2 and in the 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source: China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in research and are used in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion).
    1
  19623.  @eugeneong5336  There is a need to strike a "balance" between automation and labor. For example, in Alibaba's Hema 河马 (literally "Hippo") is China's answer to Amazon, and makes use of robotic waiters, advanced facial recognition software, mobile phone payment, but it also uses human staff like delivery people, packing assistants and other employees. Video: China's Tech Giant Alibaba Goes Offline With New Supermarkets (HBO) youtube.com/watch?v=Pl7VRRIs5Uo
    1
  19624. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  19625. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  19626. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19627. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  19628. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  19629.  @dxelson  At first, it's money that attracts you to take up the job offer. Once you have that job, it's respect and recognition that's keeps you going. What's the point of earning more money, if you personally don't feel like you are getting the recognition you think you deserve? Pay is what attracts you to a job initially, but job satisfaction is what keeps you in it.
    1
  19630. @Sheriff Lobo Countries with Most Skyscrapers (1960-2020) 1. China (2055) 2. United State (800) 3. Japan (251) 4. United Arab Emirates (251) 5. South Korea (220) 6. Australia (109) 7. Canada (108) 8. Thailand (104) 9. Indonesia (102) 10. Malaysia (91) ... Video: Countries with Most Skyscrapers (1960-2020) youtu.be/g8BRy-dyY6Y
    1
  19631. @Sheriff Lobo Apart from skyscrapers, China also constructed the world's largest airport terminal, at the Beijing Daxing International Airport (北京大兴国际机场), a testament to the quality of Chinese construction. Video: China opens Daxing International Airport with world's largest terminal youtu.be/3WOLT3e1SR8
    1
  19632.  @Carbuncle0168  Here's a video of modern day Lhasa, Tibet, China (filmed by WildFilmsIndia) and you can see how developed Lhasa has become under communist party rule. Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, and modern technology like cars, telephone cables, computers, smartphones, WiFi, the Internet, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo (By WildFilmsIndia) Even the poorest Tibetan farmer can afford a smartphone, connect to the Internet and shop online in Taobao and have his purchases shipped all the way to Tibet in the Himalayas. Because Tibet is part of China after all.
    1
  19633. @Sheriff Lobo China is home to many of the world's longest bridges, a testament to the quality of Chinese construction. Here's World's Top 10 Longest Bridges: 1. Danyang Kunshan Grand Bridge, China 2. Zhanghua-Gaoxiong Railway, China 3. Tianjin Grand Bridge, China 4. Weinan Weihe Grand Bridge, China 5. Bang Na Highway, Thailand 6. Beijing Grand Bridge, China 7. Lake Pontchartrain Causeway, USA 8. Manchac Swamp Bridge, USA 9. Yangcun Bridge, China 10. Hangzhou Bay Bridge, China
    1
  19634. @Sheriff Lobo Video: Top 10 LONGEST Bridges on Earth youtu.be/5C0uhHaAF6U
    1
  19635. @Sheriff Lobo But China's bridges are being put to use to connect different regions of China and improve connectivity. Here's Top 10 Countries In Total Bridge Length 1968 to 2020 and China ranks first in total bridge length. Video:youtu.be/BrdP9fHKVTI 1. China (12,668 km) 2. Japan (1,127 km) 3. United States (591 km) 4. India (541 km) 5. Thailand (405 km) ...
    1
  19636. @Komrade Karebear Baken Maller Decent smartphone? Check out Huawei P30 Pro ZOOM. From a high building you can zoom in 50x on a faraway chess match on the ground below. Video: Huawei P30 Pro ZOOM 50X Feature youtu.be/SeSzNxb1Eyw
    1
  19637.  @2012Prada  Experts have debunked Batsoup covid origins. Source: Is bat soup a delicacy in China? We debunk a rumour on the origin of the coronavirus observers.france24.com/en/20200203-china-coronavirus-bat-soup-debunk-videos-viral-palau-indonesia
    1
  19638. President Donald Trump himself choose to overlook Saudi Arabian crown prince involvement in murder of a journalist. Trump calls Saudi Arabia a ‘great ally,’ discounts crown prince’s responsibility for Khashoggi’s death washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-defends-saudia-arabias-denial-about-the-planning-of-khashoggis-death/2018/11/20/b64d2cc6-eceb-11e8-9236-bb94154151d2_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9b6bdd732d40
    1
  19639. +TheNinjaDC China has even sent people to space! and in 2003, Yang Liwei 杨利伟 became the first person sent into space by Chinese Space Program onboard the Shenzhou-5 神舟五号spacecraft, making China the 3rd country in the world to independently send people into space. First person sent into space by Chinese space program wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei China is the 1st Asian country to do so and even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have yet to conduct manned space missions of their own. Even Taiwan space program haven't achieved what the mainland has done.
    1
  19640. China built the world's largest radio the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) also known as Tianyan 天眼 (Eye of the Heavens) that will help scientists learn more about the universe's early days, detect low-frequency gravitational waves and hunt for signals that may have been produced by distant alien civilizations. China Finishes Building World's Largest Radio Telescope space.com/33357-china-largest-radio-telescope-alien-life.html The larger the radio dish, the more sensitive it is to picking up signals from outer space and FAST's potential to discover an alien civilization will be 5 to 10 times that of current equipment, as it can see farther and darker planets. Already since its trial operations in 2016, China's radio telescope has discovered 44 new pulsars in space thanks to its amazing sensitivity. Video: 44 pulsars identified by China's FAST telescope youtube.com/watch?v=t9nySMjiUzw But what has Taiwan been doing all this while? Taiwan's graduates are leaving the country to work and seeking out better job opportunities in the mainland.
    1
  19641. +AYAN DAS India was still a democracy since 1947 and Indian citizens can vote for their leaders. India had its first general election in 1951, which was won by the Indian National Congress, and they ruled because Indians kept voting for them. Mainland China hasn't had any election by ordinary citizens at all, and even during KMT administration of China before 1949, no elections were ever held in the mainland.
    1
  19642. +Ian H The Communist Party of China is among the world's largest political parties, with over 80 million members (about the population size of Germany) so its more difficult to control corruption within it, whereas Taiwan's political parties are a mere fraction (the KMT only has 1 million members) so obviously corruption would be easier to control.
    1
  19643. China has beaten the US in the battle for world opinion over the handling of coronavirus, according to new polling, with only three countries out of 53 believing the US has dealt with the pandemic better than its superpower rival. Source: Only three out of 53 countries say US has handled coronavirus better than China theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/15/only-three-out-of-53-countries-say-us-has-handled-coronavirus-better-than-china The 53-country survey of 120,000 people by the German polling firm Dalia Research and the Alliance of Democracies Foundation, an organisation headed by the former Nato secretary general Anders Fogh Rasmussen, reveals deep dissatisfaction with US leadership.
    1
  19644. Many former colonies are still suffering from the subservient "colonial mentality" imposed by the colonizers on the minds of the colonized. Even after the countries are physically decolonized, the "decolonization of the mind" still needs to occur. Only when the people are both physically and mentally decolonized, can the country finally break free of the trappings of colonialism.
    1
  19645.  @ellisduckworth5908  Putin is fighting for peace, he's putting an end to an 8-year long civil war in Ukraine that has cost the lives of some 13,000 people by shelling on both sides.
    1
  19646.  @ellisduckworth5908  Putin is fighting to end the Ukrainian civil war that began in 2014 with the ousting of Yanukoyvch by USA and installing their U.S puppet governments into Kiev.
    1
  19647. Many countries have banned games for similar reasons. Germany banned some WW2 games that contains swastika flags (such as Wolfenstein ). In Iran, Battlefield 3 was banned because of a fictional US invasion on Tehran. A state in Mexico banned one of Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon for depicting Mexican rebels as antagonists and Pakistan banned some Medal Of Honor and Call of Duty games for depicting Pakistanis negatively. Source: Wikipedia: List of banned video games
    1
  19648. Most of the world recognise Taiwan as part of China under the One-China Policy (even President Trump). Also, Hong Kong has its own government different from China, but is still considered part of China under the One China, Two Systems policy.
    1
  19649. Democracy is the weapon that Westerners wield to constantly keep China divided and fighting amongst ourselves. Even the whole concept of One China Two Systems was created so that HK could be allowed to keep their own government and for the mainland to keep ours. China even offered to extend the system to ROC, but ROC rejected the offer without offering a counter proposal of its own.
    1
  19650. 对我来说 中国需要走自己的路，不能盲目跟着西方。
    1
  19651.  @joebloe1401  Cyrus' videos promote the peaceful message of "Building Bridges, not Walls" between the U.S and China, and if you're claiming this message is sponsored by the Chinese, well, isn't that a positive message for the world?
    1
  19652.  @theraven5850  You said: "if all those stem graduates were as bright as you claim they are you'd have cornered the market on microchips by now." China is literally the largest exporter of microchips, controlling around half of the worldwide export market. List of countries/states by integrated circuit exports in 2019: 1. Hong Kong, China ($134,483 million) 2. Mainland China ($102,187 million) 3. Taiwan, China ($100,408 million) 4. South Korea ($79,082 million) 5. Singapore ($76,868 million) 6. Malaysia ($44,794 million) 7. United States ($40,099 million) 8. Japan ($27,791 million) 9. Vietnam ($26,084 million) 10. Philippines ($18,991 million) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by integrated circuit exports
    1
  19653.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "神州 Shenzhou So you don't know the difference between a microwave and a fighter jet?" A microwave affects the ordinary person's life far more than a fighter jet.
    1
  19654.  @andrenogueira5058  Here's a List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage in 2019: 1. Ningbo-Zhousan (China): 1,120,090 kiloton 2. Shanghai (China): 716,770 kiloton 3. Tangshan (China): 656,740 kiloton 4. Singapore (Singapore): 626,180 kiloton 5. Guangzhou (China): 606,160 kiloton 6. Qingdao (China): 577,360 kiloton 7. Suzhou (China): 522,750 kiloton 8. Port Hedland (Australia): 521,880 kiloton 9. Tianjian (China): 492,200 kiloton 10. Rotterdam (Netherlands): 469,400 kiloton ... Source: Wikipedia: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage But how are India and Vietnam going to match China's ability to ship goods out in such huge tonnage?
    1
  19655. China should commemorate the ground where the spacecraft landed in Inner Mongolia, as a milestone of China's space exploration program.
    1
  19656. @suikikin511 China is forgiving 23 interest-free loans for 17 African countries, after already cancelling $3.4 billion and restructuring $15 billion of debt from 2000-2019.
    1
  19657.  @brambl3014  The Mosque's prayer room is still intact (even the uploader's footage clearly shows so) so how is the Mosque destroyed then?
    1
  19658. ​ @brambl3014  Which mosques are being destroyed in the uploader's video? Could you at least name the allegedly destroyed mosques? The only mosques mentioned are Keriya Aitika Mosque (not destroyed, prayer room is intact) and Id Kah Mosque (not destroyed)
    1
  19659. In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned corporations for China's benefit, reining in companies that gone astray. In the U.S, the rich U.S companies control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    1
  19660. Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous relationship with a much older man has been exposed and she has expressed a desire for personal privacy, but the WTA is demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see.
    1
  19661.  @GMK189-f2k  鲁迅《热风题记》跟佩洛西访问台湾有什么关系？
    1
  19662.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Surveys showed that the views among Americans toward China were generally positive until Xi Junping took over." Could you name me the survey? According to a 2014 survey by Harvard Kennedy School’s Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, President Xi had the highest approval ratings, both at home and abroad. The Harvard Kennedy School’s Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation co-sponsored a survey on global perceptions of international leaders. The results, released this month, were based on polls of citizens in 30 countries around the world, who were asked about their familiarity with and approval of 10 world leaders. According to the survey, Chinese President Xi Jinping had the highest approval rating, both at home and abroad. Xi earned a composite 8.7 rating (out of 10), beating Russian President Vladimir Putin (8.1) for the top spot.
    1
  19663.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Precisely, and the image of him went down as time went on." Joe Biden was popular (the most voted for President in US history) but the image of him went down as time went on.
    1
  19664.  @MarkYeung1  So both of agree that popularity of presidents, both American and Chinese could decrease over time and this is normal behaviour as history has shown.
    1
  19665. NATO is like the Hare, rushing to slap sanctions on Russia and pour weapons into Ukraine, until they have exhausted their sanction options and run out of weapons to send, all the while mocking Russia for being too slow. Meanwhile, Russia is the Tortoise, making slow but steady progress towards the finish line.
    1
  19666. +Nizam Masood Hawaii is thousands of miles away from the American mainland, yet its one of 50 states of America? The Falkland Islands are located nearer to South America, but its part of British territory? Distances alone doesn't determine which country owns what.
    1
  19667. +Parm Mohan You said the USA has never been imperialistic and never controlled colonies? Did you know Philippines was a former US colony until being granted independence, so why you claim USA has never been imperialistic?
    1
  19668.  @2rodcampedison648  During the 2018 Taiwan election, the pro-independence DPP suffered major defeat and lost two posts to the pro-unification KMT, until even the pro-independence Taiwan president Tsai resigned after this humiliating defeat. So doesn't that imply that majority of the people of Taiwan don't want independence, given that they voted against Tsai?
    1
  19669.  @ottoarcueid5853  Peng Shuai wrote an email to WTA saying that the allegations of sexual assault were not true, and she even criticised the WTA for releasing unverified information without her consent.
    1
  19670.  @leonardgrant6876  You can't refute my points so you just label me as earning social credit points to demean my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    1
  19671.  @bookersbay  I find it ironic that many Westerners complain about China's massive surveillance on citizens, yet here we have Peng Shuai expressing her desire for privacy, but Western MSM and WTA are behaving like paparazzi and trying to dig out details of her private life for all the world to see.
    1
  19672.  @leonardgrant6876  "because of that I can see between the lines and can recognise all the good propaganda." Then you should be able to see clearly that Western anti-China propaganda is trying to politicize sports in an attempt to smear China's reputation for the upcoming 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics. Peng Shuai is clearly fine, and there's so much evidence of her attending small gatherings and that she expresses the desire for privacy. But Western MSM is behaving like the paparazzi and trying to dig up details of her private life for all the world to see.
    1
  19673.  @Redmanticore  You said: "well, china has now its own 18th century ethnocentrism in year 2023," Back in the 18th century, there was no ethnocentrism in Qing Dynasty China (1636–1912). Qing Dynasty was a multinational state lasting for almost three centuries and assembled the territorial base for modern China, so what "ethnocentrism" are you talking about? In fact, the Manchu rulers of Qing Dynasty abolished the concept of a Han-only China, and established China as a multi-ethnic state. After conquering "China proper", the Manchus identified their state as "China" (中國, Zhōngguó; "Middle Kingdom"), and referred to it as Dulimbai Gurun in Manchu (Dulimbai means "central" or "middle," gurun means "nation" or "state"). The emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, Tibet and other areas) as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that "China" only meant Han areas. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Qing Dynasty) So what ethnocentrism are you talking about?
    1
  19674.  @aaronjensen8455  You said: " The CCP restricted individual travelers from visiting Taiwan in 2019 (before Covid-19)." That's an unfair comparison because we are discussing China's high-speed rail (as you said) and currently there is no high-speed rail connecting mainland China to Taiwan Island, so why are you bringing up travel to Taiwan in a discussion about high-speed rail? Does Europe have a high speed rail connecting to United Kingdom then? As for Tibet and Xinjiang, China's high speed rail does connect to those region and operates trains traveling to those region despite the high cost. In fact, those train lines connecting all the way to Western China actually operate at a loss instead of a profit, keeping ticket prices affordable to passengers traveling to those region and this I believe, is a form of freedom that Chinese passengers enjoy that their European counterparts don't. Feel free to disagree and challenge this point of mine. Video: Tibet gets its fastest bullet trains as Lhasa-Nyingchi Railway starts operations youtu.be/9TLTUXfHvf8 Video: Lanxin High-Speed Railway Spurs Tourism Growth in Xinjiang youtu.be/gNf-bg5qDnQ You said: "Brian was trying to create the illusion that China has some sort of freedom that the west doesn't have." Europe’s high-speed rail network is a slow, expensive and “ineffective patchwork”, according to a report from the EU’s spending watchdog that criticised costly projects often driven by politics rather than need. The report by the European Court of Auditors found that trains rarely operated at full speed. They ran on average at 45 per cent of the line’s potential velocity and only two examined reached an average above 200km/h. None was above 250km/h. “Average speed so far below the design speed raises questions as to sound financial management,” the ECA said.
    1
  19675.  @aaronjensen8455  Convenience is a form of freedom. Europe's high speed train fare is expensive for passengers, so lower income people in Europe may be unable to afford train tickets, and this restricts their freedom in a sense. Even just the everyday travel commuting to work can hurt a travellers wallet. Whereas China's high-speed rail is relatively inexpensive and affordable to the masses. Even train lines that reach all the way to Xinjiang and Tibet (connecting Eastern China to Western China) have ticket prices within the range of ordinary travellers wallets, and the high speed rail companies actually operate those lines at a loss (without profit).
    1
  19676.  @aaronjensen8455  So now you're switching topics from high speed rail to politics? In China, while we can't change the government, but the policies change with the times. Whereas in the United States for example, they can change their government, but for the most part, their policies remain unchanged.
    1
  19677.  @aaronjensen8455  "神州 Shenzhou So now you're pretending that you didn't say that convenience is a form of freedom??? Own up to your own clumsy attempts to change the topic." Did I ever not say said that? I recall saying that "Convenience is a form of freedom" back when we were talking about high-speed rail trains, so when did I ever pretend not to say that? And I certainly didn't change the topic, I've been talking about high-speed trains all this while, until you decided to switch topics from high speed rail to politics (you said: "神州 Shenzhou Yeah, everything in communist China is now a "freedom," except for political rights." so why should I "own up to clumsy attempts" to change the topic? You said: "Policies remain unchanged" - as if the United States didn't change its policy from standing against Chinese communist aggression in Korea to reaching out to the PRC and establishing relations from the efforts of Nixon and Kissinger?" You deliberately cropped out the earlier phrase which was "but for the most part,". Also if we fast forward from Nixon's visit to today, it seems the US policy of "standing against Chinese communist aggression" still remains the same today as USA is certainly trying to contain China's rise. It's no secret today that U.S is in decline and China is rising. Many economists predict that China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's someday in the foreseeable future (perhaps in the years 2025-2028). Also, let's be clear that the purpose of Nixon visiting China was in hopes of opening up China from the inside, so that China might eventually abandon our political system under the Communist Party and to adopt a Western-style democracy. However, this is has not come to fruition, and China remains under the control of the CPC, so USA is taking ever more extreme measures (such as slapping tarrifs and sanctions) against China, so in this aspect, the U.S goals towards China remains relatively unchanged. ... Lastly, I want to touch on your phrasing of "standing against Chinese communist aggression in Korea". Korea was originally a single unified country during Joseon Dynasty, until it was invaded and occupied by Imperial Japan during the war, and after the Japanese surrendered in 1945, Korea was (needlessly) divided into North Korea (by USSR) and South Korea (by USA). North Korea was the stronger of the two and they wanted to end this humiliating division of their country, and they almost succeeded in doing so. Korea was about 95% unified under North Korea, until the USA intervened in this internal Korean Civil War and pushed the North Korean forces past the 38th Parallel Line of Division, and into actual North Korean territory, right up to China's doorstep (near Liaoning province). In the end, China had no choice but to join the Korean War and push the U.S forces back to the 38th Line. So how was it "Chinese Communist Aggression in Korea"? The US forces were the ones in North Korean territory here.
    1
  19678.  @aaronjensen8455  "神州 Shenzhou The topic was never simply about high-speed rail in the first place because the commentator and you both intentionally brought up the issue of freedom." But you choose to make it about high speed rail when you said (discussing China's high-speed rail). Yet you accused me of making "clumsy attempts to change the topic" but you're the one jumping around from topic to topic here. You said: "The U.S. isn't trying to contain China, it welcomed China into international organizations like the WTO," U.S did not welcome China into the World Trade Organization. When the WTO was founded in 1995, China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate our as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because the United States, European countries, and Japan requested that China first reform various tariff policies, including tariff reductions, open markets and industrial policies. That's why China had a late entry into WTO in 2001, because the U.S and it's allies posed obstacles for China's entry back in 1995, so please don't act as though the U.S actually welcomed China into WTO. You said: "opened its markets to Chinese products, and educated and trained China's scientists and engineers. You call that containment?" Containment is when the U.S has over 400+ overseas military bases across the globe, in Okinawa Japan, South Korea, Philippines, etc, surrounding China in their attempt to contain China's rise. In comparison, China only has at the most, a handful of overseas bases. Also if you claim U.S opening to Chinese products and Chinese international students, then Trump slapping tariffs on Chinese products, banning Chinese companies like Huawei, as well as imposing restrictions on US Visas for Chinese students and cancelling more than 1,000 Chinese student visas are examples of U.S containment of China according to the your logic. Video: China slams US over cancellation of more than 1,000 Chinese student visas https://youtu.be/jpbR_T04PwE You said: "The U.S. is helping to balance Chinese communist aggression now that China has become the neighborhood bully." China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, the USA appears to be threat to global peace and stability here. You said: "It was communist forces which started the war, and communist countries were backing the North Korean War machine." Korea was originally a single unified country (Joseon Dynasty) and it was (needless) divided into North Korea (by USSR) and South Korea (by USA) after the Japanese WWII surrender. North Korea wanted to end the humiliating division of their country then can't they attempt reunification of their divided homeland? North Korea under the communists was stronger both economically and militarily than South Korea under democracy at that time, and North Korea almost reunified their country (around 95% reunified) before the U.S intervened in this internal civil war within Korea. Not only that, the U.S forces pushed the North Korean forces back past the 38th Parallel Line of Division between North and South Korea, and into actual North Korean territory, right up to China's doorstep (Liaoning province) and that's why China eventually send the People's Liberation Army to help North Korea push the invaders back. You said: "China has a long history of interfering in the internal affairs of Korea (as well as Asian and African countries)," Could you list some examples of Chian interfering in the internal affairs of Korea as you said? Korea is our immediate neighbor, of course there's going to be historical interactions between China and Korea during these time periods: Han and Gojoseon Cao Wei and Goguryeo Sui, Tang, Goguryeo and Balhae Liao, Jin and Goryeo Yuan and Goryeo Ming and Joseon Qing and Joseon ... But during the last few centuries, China mostly had suzerainty over Korea (during Joeseon Dynasty) and did not interfere in Korea's internal affairs. There was that time that Japan invaded Korea in 1500s launched by Toyotomi Hideyoshi and the Ming Emperor dispatched Chinese troops to help Korea repel the invaders. You said: "and it was bent on controlling the Korean peninsula through its vassal state, the DPRK." How is the DPRK a vassal state of the People's Republic of China? China doesn't stations any Chinese troops in North Korea, that's why North Korea have to spend massive amounts on building their military budget. Whereas South Korea has around 28,500 American troops stationed in their country, if anything, it sounds like South Korea is a vassal of the USA if anything.
    1
  19679.  @laserraiset3300  Those people starved to death because of the Great Chinese Famine, caused by bad weather conditions like floods. In 1958, the Yellow River flooded that coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward, and the floodwaters submerged over half a million acres of crops, resulting in a poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Chairman Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather right?
    1
  19680. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19681.  @laserraiset3300  No, there's still bad weather in China like heat waves and so on. Didn't the Texas pipeline froze at one point?
    1
  19682.  @laserraiset3300  Actually, during the Great Chinese Famine, Mao wanted to import food, but the United States imposed embargo on countries and prevent them from exporting food to China, leading to starvation.
    1
  19683. Fenqing 愤青 "Angry Youth" is very similar to those Angry White Males, or SJWs in Western websites.
    1
  19684. Fenqing usually applies to any nationalist Chinese (whether its from Hong Kong, Taiwan, or the rest of the mainland) The Wumao is actually more specific to the communist party of China.
    1
  19685.  @brexitgreens  "神州 Shenzhou Or Western propaganda could be wrong regarding China and right regarding Russia." If Western propaganda already has reason to lie about the reality of China to their audiences, then it's highly likely they will do the same in their portrayal of Russia to their audiences. Some people have overcame their initial anti-China bias by watching expats in China, or perhaps by Chinese media like CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV, etc. Likewise, to counter anti-Russian propaganda, more people need to watch Russian media to see Russia's viewpoint. I mean, don't you find it suspicious that RT News and Sputnik Radio were blocked by the EU? They represent Russia's view of the conflict, and in order to achieve balance, people should at least strive to listen to both sides of the conflict. Last point about the Russian robbers you experienced, anyone from any country can commit a crime. Even Chinese scammers have a history of targeting foreign tourists in China, and this contributes to overall Sinophobic sentiment in the West. But the recent surge in Russophobia is alarming, reaching unbelievable levels and surpassing Sinophobia. Russian athletes are banned from the Olympics. Russian chess and tennis players are forbidden from participating in competitions unless they denounce their motherland. Russian musicians, composers, conductors, dancers, and other artists are being discriminated if they refuse to condemn their motherland's actions. Even Russian cats are getting banned.
    1
  19686.  @Carbuncle0168  Cyrus Janssen acknowledges that Taiwan is part of China. Even Taiwan's own constitution says that Taiwan is part of China, and since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  19687.  @seekthetruth1478  You said; "Russia is basically a gas station." That already denotes how integrated Russia is in the world. Imagine what happens if Russia cuts off gas supply to Western Europe. The EU would literally freeze during winter if not for Russian gas. Gas prices in USA are surging because Biden cut off Russian gas, but the EU cannot afford to follow the US in cutting off Russian gas.
    1
  19688.  @Carbuncle0168  ? I checked the Map of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and yes, the Communist Party of China does consider Taiwan as part of China, just as the Republic of China 🇹🇼 constitution consider Taiwan as part of China.
    1
  19689.  @Carbuncle0168  "神州 Shenzhou Republic of China is the Real China" Why'd did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Wiping out the communists should've been a piece of cake, yet despite all these advantages, the KMT lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while at the same time cementing the communists' right to rule China.
    1
  19690.  @Carbuncle0168  "Taiwan is a separate country until CCP China collapses with the help of USA and NATO" Where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is not a separate country, they consider themselves to be China (even though the KMT lost the mainland to the communists) and Taiwan is part of China. Both the PRC and the ROC agree to the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  19691.  @Carbuncle0168  "神州 Shenzhou DPP and KMT should be the only political parties of the entire China." But why? The entire China did not choose the DPP nor the KMT, then why should they be the only political parties of all of China?
    1
  19692.  @Carbuncle0168  "CCP is Evil dictatorship that must be gone." Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  19693.  @Carbuncle0168  Why do you want the Communist Party of China to collapse with the help of USA and NATO? The CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress that's been painstakingly built in our country, so why'd you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China?
    1
  19694.  @Carbuncle0168  "神州 Shenzhou America and NATO want to help China become a True Democracy but CCP want to keep Evil Dictatorship" China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. Through it all, China has always been under strong central government rule (and we still are today) of the Emperors and the Imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. China's current political system closely emulates the system of China's long history, and has proven to be extremely successful in handling the Covid-19 situation (where many Western-style democracies have failed) so is there really a need for China to abandon our political system and adopt Western-style democracy? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  19695.  @seekthetruth1478  If Russian gas was really not essential to the European Union to survive winter, then why didn't EU join the USA in banning Russian gas? The reason why neither the EU nor the UK literally freeze this winter is because Russia is continuing to supply gas to EU, despite the numerous economic sanctions EU slapped on Russia, even though NATO is officially not at war with Russia. And despite your statistics, indicating a decline (one of which is merely 5%), EU countries like Germany clearly want to expand their gas supply from Russia, that's why Nord Stream 2 pipeline was constructed. The construction of the pipeline is complete and is ready to deliver more Russian gas to Germany, all that's needed is some certification on paper to proceed, and while Germany has put the certification on hold, the Germans don't seem willing to abandon the project altogether. My prediction is that Germany is waiting for the Ukraine crisis to be over, and once tensions have returned to normal, Germany might proceed with certifying Nord Stream 2 afterwards. I mean, for all your statistics, so far none of the EU countries and UK have banned Russian gas supplies. Experts predict that for EU and UK to completely decouple for Russian gas, it would take at least over a decade. (And on the US side, Joe Biden has banned Russian gasoline, causing oil prices to reach an all time high in USA, until U.S has to seek alternative sources like from President Maduro of Venezuela, a president that up till just recently, Trump refused to acknowledge as President of Venezuela. This clearly shows how Russia is important even if only regarded as a "gas station" in your eyes.)
    1
  19696.  @seekthetruth1478  "Really? Seriously? Learn some history. The Truth is that Japan’s invasion of China saved the CCP from Chiang Kai-shek and the KMT, and ultimately allowed Mao to defeat the KMT in the ensuing civil war." How does that refute the fact that the KMT demonstrated gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland? The fact remains that KMT lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, outnumbered, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. You said: "By the end of 1934, the CCP was on the verge of extinction after KMT troops delivered another heavy blow to the Red Army in Jiangxi Province, which forced the Party to undertake the now infamous Long March to Xi’an in the northwestern province of Shaanxi." If anything, you've just further demonstrated KMT's gross incompetence, while demonstrating the Communists' tactic of the Long March (长征) bringing the communists back from the brink of annihilation. At the start of the Long March the KMT had a strength of over 300,000 nationalists, while the communists were outnumbered at just 69,000. Yet ultimately the KMT failed to wipe out the Communists and some 7,000 communists survived, so isn't this a brilliant strategy on the part of Mao Zedong and the communists, while showcasing KMT's incompetence to wipe out their enemy? You said: "Chiang initially pursued the Communist forces, and would have almost certainly delivered a final blow to the CCP if war with Japan could have been delayed." Japan had invaded Manchuria, yet Chiang was initially reluctant to meet the invaders head-on, instead he continued purging communists (our own Chinese brethren) instead of repelling the Japanese invaders, until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng had to kidnap Chiang and get him to ally with the communists against the Japanese. This incident was known as the Xi'an Incident (Xi'an Incident) You said: "As it turned out, Chiang was not able to put off the war with Japan any longer, and domestic and international pressure forced him to accept a tacit alliance with the CCP against Japan." Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was actually thanks to communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release. Only then did Chiang finally agreed to ally with the communists to fight against the Japanese invaders. You said: "While the KMT were busy uniting the country and fighting the Japanese military, CCP forces spent much of the early part of the war hiding in the mountains to avoid battle." The Communists had smaller numbers than the KMT or the Japanese, so Mao resorted to tactics that allow a smaller force to engage a much larger force, such as guerrilla tactics. You said: "At the same time, the Japanese forces largely focused on securing control of Chinese cities and strategic infrastructure, while ignoring China’s massive countryside. Thus, the KMT’s efforts to actually defend China created a power vacuum in rural areas, which the CCP came out of hiding to seize." The KMT had a much greater strength compared to the Communists, and could have easily send their own KMT forces to defend the countryside. But it was because of "capitalism" that the KMT protected the urban areas, while ignoring the peasantry in the countryside, so the Communists had to protect the countryside despite their smaller size, while covering a much wider area beyond the urban centers. This won the Communists the support of the peasants (which make up the majority of China's population at that time). You said: "According to Soviet military advisers stationed in CCP-controlled areas at the time, the CCP also used this land to grow opium to fund its growing operations." The Kuomintang engaged in opium trafficking to fund their operations as well, this was commonplace in China at that time, and the KMT's opium operations were far more extensive than the Communists. After the communists took control of mainland China, Mao Zedong began the campaign to successfully rid China of opium addiction.
    1
  19697. ​ @seekthetruth1478  You said: "The war not only allowed the CCP to grow much stronger, but it also greatly depleted the Nationalist’s strength. This allowed the CCP to prevail easily in the civil war." Let's take the period after the Japanese surrender in 1945 at the end of WWII. After the Japanese surrender, the Nationalist Kuomintang had a strength of -2 million (regular) -2.3 million (militia) (June 1946) Whereas the Communists had a strength of -1.2 million (regular) -2.6 million (militia) (July 1945) ... Source: Wikipedia: Chinese Civil War So even after the Japanese surrendered in 1945, the total KMT strength still outnumbered the Communists, yet despite this numerical advantage the KMT still lost the mainland to a dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants army? And mind you, this was after the Japanese surrendered, so there was no more fighting the Japanese after 1945. You said: "The CCP had a choice: it could have prioritized defending the country against Japan during the war, or it could have prioritized seizing control of China from those who did fight the Japanese. It chose the latter. Meanwhile, by choosing to actually try to defend China against Japan during the war, the Nationalists handed the country to the CCP afterwards." Again, this is nothing more that further demonstration of KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while at the same time cementing the communists' right to rule China. Mao's strategy ultimately proved superior over Chiang's, and that's while the Communist Party of China has survived from the brink of extinction to becoming among the world's largest political parties today at some 90 million members (about the population size of Germany). Meanwhile, despite having virtually all the advantages during the Civil War, the KMT still lost the mainland and had to flee to Taiwan, and even today the KMT has been reduced to a shadow of its former glory, losing elections to the DPP political party in Taiwan for example. You said: "Xi's and the CCP’s decision to create a national observance day to honor its defense of China during the second Sino-Japanese War represents the height of hypocrisy." How is it hypocrisy? Clearly, the Communists did participate in defending China during the 2nd Sino-Japanese War. By the end of the war, the communists fought some 19,000 engagements of varying sizes against the Japanese, then why is it hypocritical to honor the communists defense of China? You said: "It’s one thing to try to suppress all information exposing the Party’s failings, which killed millions of Chinese." It was a Chinese Civil War, of course Chinese were killing Chinese. Just like during the American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans. Or Vietnamese during Vietnam Civil War. Or Koreans during Korean Civil War, or any civil war for that matter. You said: "It’s another thing altogether to falsely claim credit for one of the defining moments of your country’s modern history." The communists clearly participated in the defense of China against Japanese invaders, then can't credit be given to the communists where credit is due? You said: "And it’s really something unprecedented to create a national holiday to honor your Party for doing something it consciously avoided; namely, putting China’s defense over the CCP itself. Classy." We've gone over this before, that when the Japanese invaded Manchuria, Chiang kai-shek was clearly reluctant to meet the invaders head-on, instead he continued purging communists (our fellow Chinese), yet people still honor Chiang despite him prioritizing killing communists over defending China from the Japanese. Even you admitted to this when you said: "As it turned out, Chiang was not able to put off the war with Japan any longer," so couldn't you say the same of Chiang? And during the 2nd Sino-Japanese War, the communists were clearly not in charge of China, so how can you expect them to prioritize defense of China when they aren't the ruling party? Yet despite the communist's smaller size, they participated in defending China, through employing tactics that allow a smaller force to engage a larger opponent, such as guerrilla warfare. According to you, it was the KMT that ruled China with their superior numbers, so ultimately, defense of China fell upon the KMT's shoulders, while the communists were a relatively minor player. Now that the communists have come to power in China, obviously the burden of China defense falls on their shoulders now.
    1
  19698.  @ChnesRep中華民國OfTaiwan  Because the conflict between Russia and Ukraine isn't really between those two countries, it's really between Russia and NATO. Putin had wanted assurance that NATO would not expand eastward (i.e that Ukraine will not be allowed to join NATO). Many NATO countries like France and Germany are reluctant to admit Ukraine into NATO (citing concerns over Ukraine government corruption) but they refused to put that down in writting to reassure Putin. After realising that for years, his words had fallen on deaf ears, Putin finally decided to act. 2) And for the "whole village" following the chief's calling, it's not the whole world that follows USA, only UK, Canada, Australia, the EU countries, Japan etc. Those who either abstained or voted in support of Russia in the UN assembly, are China, India, Pakistan, etc and altogether make up more than 50% of the world's population, so it isn't true that the whole village is behind the USA. In fact, the USA and NATO are going around bullying China, India, Pakistan and other countries that refuse to condemn or sanction Russia, so isn't it the West that cannot accept countries that don't condemn Russia here?
    1
  19699.  @ChnesRep中華民國OfTaiwan  Russia has literally exhausted all other methods apart from military intervention. Putin has tried diplomacy plenty of times before. For example, the Minsk Agreements were drafted up to stop the fighting in Donbas (i.e Donetsk and Luhansk), include a ceasefire, facilitate withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, and institute constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas. However, the Minsk Agreements were never honored, and its guarantors, France and Germany continually neglect to enforce it. The village chief (USA) and his harem of concubines (NATO countries) were wooing Ukraine to marry into their family, but for all their talk, they aren't intervening to protect Ukraine. After all their sweet talk, NATO countries till today still refuse to put troops on the ground to defend Ukraine. Ukraine's membership to join NATO is now unlikely to succeed, because it would mean NATO is obliged to send troops to defend Ukraine if it were a member, and I just can't see that happening. In fact, Zelenskyy has remarked that NATO has abandoned Ukraine, so can't you see USA was just using Ukraine to provoke Russia that's all?
    1
  19700. About Capitalism vs Communism, it's no secret today that Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can theoretically produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, for everyone on the planet. Yet we still have starvation, homelessness, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, because under capitalism, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." The Earth's resources are finite and while capitalism seeks to exhaust them, communism is dedicated to allocating resources according to needs.
    1
  19701.  @jaimemartinez9792  A long time study by Harvard University has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. Source: Harvard survey finds Chinese satisfaction with govt rises china.org.cn/china/2020-07/17/content_76281590.htm
    1
  19702. China does not want to global superpower like USA. It is a tiring, taxing and thankless position to have. China is willing to share rulership of the world, through global governance, and only USA is interested in maintaining its global hegemony.
    1
  19703.  @NOSOUND921  If the CPC's message is the same as Cyrus Janssen's "build bridges, not burn them", then is there something wrong with promoting that message?
    1
  19704.  @mingwahleung7579  Nobody force you to watch Cyrus Janssen's channel.
    1
  19705.  @panosgamithis8868  Why is Cyrus Janssen being labelled as a shill, just for saying positive things about China?
    1
  19706.  @panosgamithis8868  So would you agree that people who pump NEGATIVES about China are shills too? Because I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, and I was appalled at the sheer amount of Western anti-China propaganda out there. Whenever I bring up China's achievements, many Westerners just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist shill, or told me to "Go back to China if you like it there."
    1
  19707.  @blackjackreward4456  China's supercomputer Tianhe-1 (天河-1) found that the lungs of a young American vaper hospitalized in USA for "mysterious pneumonia" 2019 summer could be a victim of coronavirus. scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3079046/chinese-supercomputer-and-american-doctors-clash-over-ai/ But many Westerners would laugh at Chinese deductions and write it off as propaganda.
    1
  19708. @Dio Y 你对习近平有怨恨，那你为什么骂整个中共？
    1
  19709.  Peder Hansen  If China can someday surpass the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this eventual goal?
    1
  19710.  @InformationWarfare2025  It is “extremely unlikely” that the coronavirus leaked from a lab in the Chinese city of Wuhan, according to the head of a team of experts, Dr. Peter Ben Embarek from the World Health Organization.
    1
  19711.  @InformationWarfare2025  Search for NBC News titled: Unlikely that Covid came from Wuhan lab, WHO says
    1
  19712.  @hiroipip  Western countries are just pointing fingers at China for their catastrophic failure to handle the Covid-19 situation in their lands, compared to China's superb handling.
    1
  19713.  @hiroipip  China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    1
  19714.  @hiroipip  If according to you, "everyone says it's a pandemic in November already." then why didn't Western countries take precautions back in November, you tell me? You're just trying to blame China for the catastrophic failure of Western countries to handle their own coronavirus situation, despite the heads up from China and the WHO.
    1
  19715.  @hiroipip  Chinese government rushed to built a temporary 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised. China also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. Video: Huoshenshan: the hospital built in 10 days in China over coronavirus outbreak youtu.be/l2QfufpwfdY Video: Time-lapse video shows how Leishenshan hospital completed in 12 days youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk Westerners could see how seriously China was taking the Covid-19 situation, yet Westerners just laugh at China's misfortune and mocked China's temporary hospitals as "concentration camps" and refused to take similar precautions of their own. Now they want to blame China for their spectacular failure towards control Covid-19 in their lands.
    1
  19716.  @hiroipip  How is the Chinese government ridiculous? They were facing an unknown pneumonia-like illness, and they identified the coronavirus strain in record time and sequenced its genome to share with the WHO, you had the same information at the same time China uncovered it. You really think that when a new disease emerges, China magically knows everything about the mysterious pneumonia like illness? It was called the novel coronavirus for a reason you know.
    1
  19717.  @hiroipip  China literally built 2 1000-bed temporary hospitals in 10-12 days, how did China not inform other countries? I gave you the dates that China submitted information about the coronavirus to WHO so other countries had access to the same information from WHO, yet you're just blindly blaming China? Today, China has the coronavirus situation under control whereas it's raging out of control in Western countries, so how's it China to blame? You just want a scapegoat China for other countries failure to respond that's all.
    1
  19718.  @amn2760  If according to your logic, that China started this pandemic to weaken Western forces, then why did China release the virus in Wuhan? It makes no sense at all, this conspiracy theory of yours.
    1
  19719.  @amn2760  Where's your evidence that China deliberately release the virus on Western countries? And Western countries have arguably the world's best medical expertise, the best doctors, the most advanced medical facilities, yet they are lost to China's inferior medical system when it comes to handling Covid-19? This conspiracy theory of yours makes no sense at all.
    1
  19720.  @omar-fy7cr  You still believe those organ harvesting rumours?
    1
  19721.  @markgreen8045  If China doesn't care how Covid-19 has impacted the world, then why is China sharing vaccines (donating them even) to other countries? Why is China manufacturing PPE and shipping them around the world? Chinese doctors are sharing Covid-19 information with the rest of the world, but Western countries choose to blame China for their own catastrophic failure to deal with Covid-19.
    1
  19722.  @markgreen8045  "@神州 Shenzhou More lies from China" China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    1
  19723.  @markgreen8045  Western countries are the ones pointing fingers at China and blaming us for their catastrophic failure to deal with Covid-19 in their lands. China lockdown Wuhan and rushed to built a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised. China also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. Video: Huoshenshan: the hospital built in 10 days in China over coronavirus outbreak youtu.be/l2QfufpwfdY Video: Time-lapse video shows how Leishenshan hospital completed in 12 days youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk Yet many Westerners laughed at China's misfortune and mocked China's temporary hospitals as "concentration camps." Now that Covid-19 reached their shores, they are blaming China for their spectacular failure to contain the Covid-19 situation?
    1
  19724.  @markgreen8045  你学了中文来骂人家吗？
    1
  19725.  @markgreen8045  "Do you know what a sock puppet is?" Yes. You. All you done is blame China that's all, I use logic and cite sources to support my arguments. All you done is blame China that's all, you can't even refute my points I brought up.
    1
  19726.  @markgreen8045  Those are wise words by Bruce Lee. The fact that you're verbally insulting me after I corrected you, suggests that you're the former, not the latter.
    1
  19727.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "The crackdown on private tutoring doesn't result in competition." Chinese government is cracking down on private tutoring for profit, because not every Chinese family can afford tuition. Rich Chinese families can easily afford private tuition, whereas poor Chinese families cannot afford it. The crackdown on private tuition actually helps to level the playing field for Chinese students, whether rich or poor, and not granting an advantage to students from rich families. This is one way to address the inequality. You said: "The crackdown on male culture doesn't result in competition." What male culture is under crackdown? Which xiaobailian (小白脸) boy band has been banned in China?
    1
  19728.  @MarkYeung1  Again, because not all families can afford private tuition in China. The rich families can afford private tuition, while poor families may not. China has banned for-profit tutoring in subjects on the school curriculum which helps "level the playing field" so for students, rich or poor, and this helps bridge the gap in inequality. Also, you mentioned: "The crackdown on male culture doesn't result in competition." but again, which xiaobailian (小白脸) boyband is being crackdown on in China?
    1
  19729.  @MarkYeung1  "What happened to the shareholders who bought the stocks before the various crackdowns." President Xi Jinping said: "Houses are for people to live in, not for speculation." (房子是用来住的、不是用来炒的。) Those people who buy houses in order to deprive others of owning a house, because they want to speculate about prices are bound to get their fingers burnt one day. What's the point of economic development if the people don't have homes to live in? Take Hong Kong for example, and the rich property tycoons literally control the land prices and make buying a house a complete nightmare for young Hong Kong couples wanting to settle down, that's one of the reasons why there was protest and riots in 2019 Hong Kong. Because the young people in Hong Kong are fed up with overspeculation in Hong Kong real estate, driving up property prices beyond the reach of young couples.
    1
  19730.  @MarkYeung1  "But with some many crackdowns over the last 6 months, without any prior warning, it makes it difficult to invest in Chinese economy." Who gives prior warning before conducting a crackdown? You think the police will politely knock on the door of a house that they are going to conduct a raid, and give the criminals time to escape or hide the evidence of their crime? Of course not. Also, you mentioned: "The crackdown on male culture doesn't result in competition." but again, which xiaobailian (小白脸) boyband is being crackdown on in China?
    1
  19731.  @MarkYeung1  That's why President Xi Jinping said: "Housing is for living in, not for speculation." In the mainland, the mainland government can take steps to reduce speculation in the housing market, whereas in Hong Kong, the rich property tycoons in Hong Kong control the scarce real estate and encourages overspeculation to jack up the land price. Additionally, Hong Kong is a tax haven for the capitalists, so the Hong Kong government doesn't receive revenue from tax, so they turn to the sales of land for revenue, so they are in bed with the Hong Kong property tycoons in jacking up the price of housing. Even before the The 2019 Hong Kong riots, Hong Kong already had a housing problem. Video: How Hong Kong is home to the crazy rich and the mega poor youtu.be/EUHDAfD0Z-Q
    1
  19732.  @MarkYeung1  "there's always a risk of doing business in China." That statement is pretty much redundant. Any businessman will tell you that doing business is always accompanied by risk of some sort. Every business contains risks, I mean, which business has absolutely zero risk, you tell me? Then what's the point of your statement when that is common knowledge among business-owners?
    1
  19733.  @MarkYeung1  Every business venture has associated risks, which business is absolutely risk-free, you tell me? And despite what you said, China was the largest recipient of new foreign direct investment in 2020, overtaking the US for the first time. The Chinese economy brought in 163 billion dollars compared to the 134 billion attracted by the United States in 2020. Video: China overtakes US as top country for foreign investment | DW News youtu.be/o-VHewwSz3A Yet you claim "No wonder why so many of them are scared off/turned off"? Also, you earlier you mentioned: "The crackdown on male culture doesn't result in competition." but what do you mean by this statement? Which boyband is being crackdown on in China, you tell me?
    1
  19734.  @MarkYeung1  Hong Kong government is reluctant to crackdown on the property market, because Hong Kong is a tax haven for capitalists, so their government doesn't receive revenue from tax, instead they earn revenue from land sales. So the Hong Kong government wants to real estate prices to be as high as possible for maximum revenue. This is what happens when you have rich corporations or property tycoons controlling the government at the expense of ordinary people in Hong Kong. Whereas in mainland China, the Chinese government controls the Chinese companies for China's benefit, reining in companies when they gone too far.
    1
  19735.  @MarkYeung1  Why did you claim that so many of investors are scared off/turned off, when China is the world's largest recipient of foreign direct investment? Video: China becomes world's largest recipient of FDI youtu.be/h84umovL03w Also, you earlier you mentioned "The crackdown on male culture doesn't result in competition." but what do you mean by this statement? Which boyband is being crackdown in China, you tell me? It's like you just shoot your mouth off, without bothering to do proper research.
    1
  19736.  @MarkYeung1  So you agree that China is world's largest recipient of foreign investment, yet why'd you claim earlier that so many of investors are scared off/turned off? Even post pandemic, China is an economic engine driving global growth, so China remains a magnet for foreign investment. Video: Why China remains a magnet for foreign investment youtu.be/7FJWROxwkBI
    1
  19737.  @MarkYeung1  Google left China because it lost the majority market share to it's Chinese rival, Baidu. Even though Google’s market share climbed from 15% in mid-2006 to 31% in 2010, Baidu’s market share increased from 47% in mid-2006 to 64% in 2010, which is a significant lead. Baidu also introduced several innovative search features customized for local tastes. Baidu introduced community-oriented services that appealed to Chinese Internet users, including bulletin boards where leads on information could be exchanged–a service that Google dismissed as having nothing to do with search. Baidu also offered instant messaging, a hit with China’s Netizens. Plus, Baidu was first to the market with mobile search and information offered up in multimedia, including video clips. Baidu also set up a national network of advertising resellers in 200 Chinese cities to educate businesses about the power of online advertising–a step that Google did not take. One other key factor put Baidu in the lead: Its search technology was considered superior to Google’s in the Mandarin language.
    1
  19738.  @MarkYeung1  Source: Forbes: Why Google Is Quitting China
    1
  19739.  @MarkYeung1  No, read that 2010 article by Google entitled: Why Google Is Quitting China explaining the reasons why Google left mainland China. Taken from the source: Even though Google's market share climbed from 15% in mid-2006 to 31% today, the company had hoped for a bigger share by now. Kai-Fu Lee, Google China's former president, told me in 2006 that Google not only wanted to have a competitive product to Baidu's, the local search leader, but a superior product. This didn't happen: Baidu has only increased its market share, going from 47% in mid-2006 to 64% today. That's a big lead. So that's why Google left mainland China, because their market share was 31% in 2010, whereas its rival company Baidu market share was 64% in 2010. So Google decided to cut their losses and move to Hong Kong.
    1
  19740.  @MarkYeung1  Video: Search engine market share ranking in China 2010 to 2020 youtu.be/Z5QhSfE1KHk
    1
  19741.  @MarkYeung1  I support my arguments using facts such as the China is world's largest recipient of foreign investment, but you just shoot off your mouth that "so many of investors are scared off/turned off" without any proof to support your statement. Also, earlier you said: "The crackdown on male culture doesn't result in competition." but what do you mean by this statement? How is male culture being crackdown in China and which boyband is banned in China?
    1
  19742.  @Shadowless_Kick  You said: "When I said "majority", I should say the majority of overseas Chinese who pay attention to this event" Now you're just moving the goal post after I've scored a goal. But even so, the fact remains that online users can create multiple accounts to post the same comment, and also the fact that overseas Chinese who watched the event, approve of it, but did not feel the need to leave such comments behind, are excluded from your count, meaning that even with the new criteria, you cannot claim that the majority of overseas Chinese who pay attention to this event have reached such a consensus.
    1
  19743.  @mfmf100  Which part of the "One country, Two systems” policy is the mainland not following? The Hong Kong people can enjoy democracy by electing their own leaders (Hong Kong's Chief Executive was voted in after receiving 777 votes from the 1,194-member Election Committee.) And all the mainland does is approve the candidate that's all. The mainland does not get to choose which candidate gets elected. So what's the problem here?
    1
  19744. @J Doe In the past, the port city of Hong Kong was once more advanced than the mainland cities. But today, Hong Kong has faltered behind mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Ningbo, Zhoushan, etc. Hong Kong is also facing increasing competition from rising mainland cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Dalian, Xiamen, etc. So what makes you think CCP government is "brutal, abusive and oppressive" when mainland China is clearly prospering? Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage
    1
  19745. @J Doe "@神州 Shenzhou It's easy to tell how bad a leader is by their supporters." President Xi Jinping is among the most popular leaders in the world, both IN China and OUTSIDE China. According to the following source: Chinese President Xi Jinping had the highest approval rating, both at home and abroad. Xi earned a composite 8.7 rating (out of 10), beating Russian President Vladimir Putin (8.1) for the top spot. Both Putin and Xi had astonishingly high domestic approval ratings, with Xi at 9 out of 10 and Putin at 8.7 The World’s Most Popular Leader: China’s President Xi Source: thediplomat.com/2014/12/the-worlds-most-popular-leader-chinas-president-xi/ I mean, do the people of Hong Kong actually like their leaders at all? What has the Hong Kong Chief Executive even do for the people of Hong Kong? Why nobody knows who the Hong Kong Chief Executive is? But more and more people are knowing about Chinese President Xi Jinping?
    1
  19746. @J Doe What makes you think the mindset of Chinese of 5,000 years ago, would respect Hong Kong or Taiwan independence today? Did you read Chinese history before? The First Emperor of China, Qin Shihuangdi, unified China by conquering the other provinces (bloodily) and proclaiming himself emperor of Qin Dynasty China. And historically, Chinese emperors were always afraid of independent states breaking loose from China, so what makes you think a Chinese of 5000 years ago would simply let those states go? You don't even know Chinese history, yet presume to think Chinese people would let those territory go? You think "democracy" is somehow better? Then why historically, many countries and human societies choose to have political power concentrated in the hands of the few, instead of the many? For example, nobles (aristocracy) priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchies). Such political systems were commonplace historically, simply because they worked! The elite minority were oftentimes well-educated and politically savvy to make important decisions for the country, instead of the uneducated masses. I mean, why let the ordinary people decide what's best for the country? Why not let the people who know how to lead, lead?
    1
  19747. @J Doe "@神州 Shenzhou - Trump We'll be getting rid of him in 2020." That is exactly the major flaw of your American system. Your US presidents have to step down after their term is over (4-8 years) so they can only make short term plans for America's future at the most, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. Whereas the Chinese government has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's direction and future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc, and to set specific goals for China to achieve. Some of these goals include (but are not limited to): -By 2020, China plans to eliminate poverty completely and establish moderately prosperous society. -By 2025, China plans to transform our manufacturing industry to incorporate high-end technology. -By 2030, China plans to be world leader in Artificial Intelligence -By 2035, China plans to be key innovative, scientific power and establish moderately socialist society. -By 2040, China plans to ban all fossil fuel powerplants and all non-electric vehicles for greener future. -By 2045, China plans to be world leading space nation, having established a space elevator. -By 2050, China plans to have surpassed the USA as global superpower, economically and militarily. Source: Xi Plans to Turn China Into a Leading Global Power by 2050 bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-17/xi-to-put-his-stamp-on-chinese-history-at-congress-party-opening By abolishing the presidential term limit, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come into fruition in the future. But US leaders can't make long term plans for America, because they have to step down when their term is over. Can't you see the big flaw in your system here? Why is China surging on ahead, while America is in decline? How are numerous 4-8 term US presidents going to compete with Chinese leaders of limitless terms?
    1
  19748. @J Doe China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. And the CCP today is gearing towards ancient Chinese political system (like abolishing term limits for example) President Xi Jinping is like a Chinese emperor, surrounded by his court of ministers and officials, in the form of the Communist Politburo. I mean, China has a wealth of experience, in the form of political literature, governing manuals, military textbooks and whatnot, to help guide our leaders in governing the world's most populous country. And look at Hong Kong and Taiwan, they were traditionally part of Qing Dynasty China, so why can't People's Republic of China claim those territories then? I mean, the United Nations has recognized PRC as "the only legitimate representative of China".
    1
  19749.  @mfmf100  About the CCP approving the HK candidate, that is clearly part of the Basic Hong Kong Law and the mainland reserves the right to appoint the HK candidate as per terms of the agreement. According to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條) : "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." Source: Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong_Basic_Law_Article_45 So the HK Chief Executive will be appointed by the Central People's Government (CCP) isn't it? Therefore, CCP is not violating the "two systems" policy. Otherwise, which part of Hong Kong law is CCP violating then, you tell me?
    1
  19750.  @mfmf100  About lifetime leadership, look at Germany for example and Angela Merkel has been in office since 2005, serving as German Chancellor for over 10 years. Long-term leadership can result in long planning for countries (especially if leaders have the foresight to plan ahead) I mean, since China is doing so well under CCP dictatorship, then why is there a need to change then? Because Westerners say so?
    1
  19751.  @mfmf100  Agreed that it is written that "the ultimate aim is the selection of the Chief Executive by universal suffrage upon nomination by a broadly representative nominating committee in accordance with democratic procedures.” But it is also written that the Hong Kong Chief Executive has to be appointed by the Central People's Government, and therefore, CCP reserves the right to appoint HK's Chief Executive. So which part of the "two-systems" policy is CCP violating then, you tell me? How does PRC have "direct, complete" control when no one from mainland China can vote in Hong Kong elections?
    1
  19752.  @mfmf100  About lifetime leadership, then what about a country like Singapore? Singapore has been ruled by authoritative single-party government (PAP) for its entire life as a nation! For over 50 years, the PAP governed Singapore with an iron fist, and Lee Kuan Yew was a tyrant who tolerated no political opposition to his rule. But under this benevolent leadership, Singapore grew from a small sleepy fishing village nation, into a prosperous economic country, with living standards surpassing many of its neighboring countries. All this, because the PAP had the foresight to plan long-term and implement long-term changes to Singapore. So why can't China follow our own path to success then? Must China adopt Western democracy, simply because Westerners say so?
    1
  19753.  @mfmf100  That's your own problem with "democracy" then. Why have such a system where it is susceptible to outside influence? Wasn't US president Trump elected allegedly by Russian hacking? Why expose your country's own political decisions to foreign influence in the first place? That's all the more reason why China should stick to our own political system (internal election within the CCP) instead of exposing our political system to outside influence. And again, which Hong Kong Law did the CCP supposedly violate you tell me? The CCP is granted the right to appoint each Hong Kong Chief Executive (as pursuant to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45) so the CCP is not violating any laws of the "two-system" policy isn't it?
    1
  19754. China today have international brands like Huawei, Lenovo, etc. and our Internet Giants like Alibaba, Baidu, Tencent have become powerful. But what well-known international brands does India have at all? Source: Wikipedia: List of largest Internet companies
    1
  19755. Only Chinese media boldly use the word "Withdrawal" while Indian media uses "Disengagement" to make it appear less humiliating.
    1
  19756. Prince Inc Once Chinese government negotiate $10 billion dollar economic investment in Bhutan, then we can resume building the road, without pesky Indian army troops too.
    1
  19757.  @rpg1663  What makes you think that if Apple were subject to the same chip ban as Huawei, that Apple would surely find a solution?
    1
  19758. "The U.S is the only developed country in the world whose bottom 50% of lower income group have not seen their lives improved for nearly 40 years." - Kishore Mabubani
    1
  19759.  @ahahaku2663  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。虽然"South China Morning Post"本来是香港媒体，但还是对大路有些偏见。
    1
  19760. Land snatchers? Which is the race that caused genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals and continue occupying their lands even till today?
    1
  19761. Actually, the communist party of China has been said be more capitalist than some Western countries.
    1
  19762. Studies have shown Chinese people are among the most intelligent and diligent people in the world, with long rich history and diverse cultures. People often stereotype Chinese as hardworking, smart, good at math, good at science, good with money and having good head for business. Stereotypical Chinese jobs include doctors, lawyers, engineers, programmers, bankers, scientists, businessmen, etc. And stereotypical blue-collar jobs for Chinese have an element of hard work to them, like railroad construction workers, laborers (coolies), rickshaw drivers, chefs (of Chinese restaurants) grocery stall owners, dry cleaners, laundromat workers, nail salons, massage parlours, etc. Of course these are just stereotypes, but there must be some element of truth to it. Chinese (and other Asians like Japanese and Koreans) are often prescribed as the "model minority" from the above perceptions and there's a reason why the Mongol and Manchu conquerors of China, eventually assimilated into Chinese culture.
    1
  19763. Not just the Chinese people, credit should also be given to the Communist Party of China for their effective policies and quick implementation. But it seems that many Westerners are reluctant to give credit to the Chinese government, where credit is due.
    1
  19764.  @MarkYeung1  The North Korean government has shown to be competent in their handling of the Covid-19 in their country, so as Chinese, I give credit to the DPRK's government and their people for a job well done in containing Covid-19 in their country. However, many Westerners are relunctant to give credit to the Communist Party of China for a job well done in handling Covid-19. Shouldn't credit be given where credit is due?
    1
  19765.  @MarkYeung1  神州 Shenzhou Absolutely." Does that mean you agreed to give credit to the Communist Party of China where credit is due? As for New Zealand, their Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has announced a nationwide lockdown after the country confirmed 1 coronavirus case, so isn't that basically the same as China's Zero Covid policy?
    1
  19766.  @MarkYeung1  Taiwan's vaccination is slow, only 1% of their population have been vaccinated. Mainland China actually offered to send WHO-approved vaccines to Taiwan, but Taiwan has rebuked the mainland's offer of vaccines. It appears that the Democratic Progressive Party rather play politics with the mainland than prioritize the lives of the people in Taiwan. Video: Cross-strait politics get in the way of Taiwan’s desperate need for Covid-19 vaccines youtu.be/kgTqgarKzZw
    1
  19767.  @MarkYeung1  So by giving credit to New Zealand government for their Zero Covid Policy, that means you also give credit to the Chinese government for their Zero Covid Policy too, isn't it?
    1
  19768.  @MarkYeung1  Actually if you look at it, it's the Western vaccines like AstraZeneca by Oxford, that recorded side-effects like blood clotting. As far as I know, no vaccine can guarantee 100% no side effect. But having access to vaccine is better than having none, and Taiwan Democratic Progressive Party deliberately rebuked the mainland's offer of vaccines, showing that they put politics over the people's lives.
    1
  19769.  @MarkYeung1  Clinics offering Sinovac in Hong Kong have all mostly been fully booked.
    1
  19770.  @MarkYeung1  According to South China Morning Post: most clinics offering Sinovac are also booked solid, so how is this fake news?
    1
  19771.  @MarkYeung1  Why would the clinics offering Sinovac be fully booked if demand for Sinovac was low? How is that fake news?
    1
  19772. Its just extending presidential term that's all. If a leader shown to be strong and capable, why not leave him in power for while longer, so that extract maximum benefit for China before he step down. Its not as though its permanent position.
    1
  19773. 李昊洋 Chinese history is full of both benevolent rulers as well as tyrant leaders. But when a ruler prove to be too harsh, too corrupt and unpopular, the people will eventually rise up and topple the government in a rebellion. I thought you claim to study history yourself for 10 years. The Chinese government is reviving the "Mandate of Heaven" doctrine, where a competent ruler is allowed to stay in power, in order to maximise the benefits to China, while an incompetent ruler will eventually be overthrown by rebellions. This doctrine might be ancient, but it has guided China for 5000 years and allowed China to survive the course of history relatively intact.
    1
  19774. 李昊洋 You think kids in democratic countries don't put their lives at risk too? Look at United States for example, where American soldiers are fighting and dying in foreign soil, such as during Gulf War, Afghan War, Iraq War, Libyan War, etc, even in the 21st century. China is currently at peace and not a war with other country, since our last major war in 1979, 30 years ago. If my kids have to someday fight and risk their lives, then why not fight for the country, instead for other country's sake and dying on foreign soil, like the US wars in Middle East? So why are you claiming my logic is stupid, when everything I said draws upon actual historical facts? You are entitled to your own opinion if you want democracy, but does that mean you can label other form of governments as "stupid"? Modern Western liberal democracy has only about 200-300 years of history, whereas China has survived 5000 years of history without democracy, so it sees no need to implement democracy. Nobody said democracy is the best form of government, and China is living proof of a successful alternative form of government. Are you sure you studied history for 10 years? Many historical societies had political power concentrated in the hands of an elite few, such as nobles (aristocracy) or priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy) and so on.
    1
  19775. 李昊洋 You keep asking about China's death tolls, but in the end, China is still the most populous nation on Earth, even with One-Child-Policy, so what exactly is your point, if you keep on labeling my points as "stupid"? Like I said, you are entitled to your own opinion, but it does that mean you should call other point of views "stupid"? Which of my points do you think is "stupid" you tell me? Mao Zedong is only human, and made mistakes like one. The CPC has publicly acknowledged the failure of his domestic policies and even Mao made a self-criticism and stepped down from being state Chairman. Why are you so obsessed with Mao? You clearly said previously that you support President Xi and believe he is doing a good job, so why do you believe he will become Mao? You think President Xi doesn't learn from Mao's mistakes and not to repeat them? You keep claiming my points are stupid, then why don't you explain exactly how are they stupid? Historically, political power is held by a few people, such as nobles, priests, kinds, etc, because such people are educated and politically savvy enough to make important decisions regarding the country. You said you study History for 10 years, but exactly what have you learnt from history then? I made my own points, and if you think them "stupid" then why don't you present some opinions of your own?
    1
  19776.  @Grenadier311  Could you explain how China wasn't cooperative with the World Health Organization? China informed WHO in Dec 2019 about the emergence of a new coronavirus strain and I believe it was actually WHO itself who advised against the implementating travel restrictions. World Health Organization chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said on Monday there was no need for measures that "unnecessarily interfere with international travel and trade" in trying to halt the spread of a coronavirus that has killed 361 people in China. Source: WHO chief says widespread travel bans not needed to beat China virus reuters.com/article/us-china-health-who/who-chief-says-widespread-travel-bans-not-needed-to-beat-china-virus-idUSKBN1ZX1H3 "We call on all countries to implement decisions that are evidence-based and consistent," Tedros told the WHO executive board, reiterating his message from last week when he declared an international emergency.
    1
  19777.  @Grenadier311  "Firstly, Beijing is on record below as being critical of the aforementioned travel restrictions in early February." According to your source: Spokeswoman Hua Chunying said Washington has “unceasingly manufactured and spread panic," noting that the WHO has advised against travel restrictions. So China is using WHO advisory against travel restrictions to support our criticism of the US travel restrictions. In your second source, Hua again cites WHO's advisory against travel restrictions to support the our stance that USA overreacted. From your 2nd source “Most countries appreciate and support China’s efforts to fight against the novel coronavirus, and we understand and respect them when they adopt or enhance quarantine measures at border entry,” Hua said. “But in the meantime, some countries, the U.S. in particular, have inappropriately overreacted, which certainly runs counter to WHO advice.” In your 3rd source, again China uses WHO advisory against travel restrictions. From your 3rd source. He said London had vowed to follow the advice of the World Health Organization (WHO) in its warning to British citizens there. "We asked them to take (the) advice of (the) WHO to make a reasonable response, do not overreact. All in all, China is using WHO's advisory against travel restrictions to support our claim that Western countries overreacted. The WHO is the world's leading advisory on health and they advised against travel restrictions, so our claims of overreaction are not unfounded.
    1
  19778.  @Grenadier311  Your Dr Fauci article is sadly outdated. Here's what he said. In any event, Fauci, who is perhaps the world's foremost immunologist, indicated that the president's criticized restrictions on travel from China in late January have protected the United States from an outbreak of the Wuhan flu of the likes of which has been seen in Italy, a country of fewer than 63 million where 368 died of the illness on Sunday alone, and almost 25,000 have tested positive. But look at USA today and USA has surpassed China in number of Covid-19 cases with over 80,000 cases. Video: US Cases Of Coronavirus Pass China As Unemployment Claims Rise youtu.be/XB-ZQpC42EQ Beyond this unprecedented health crisis there's a huge economic toll on American families going from a 50-year low unemployment to a now record 3.2 million filing for unemployment benefits. As for CDC and WHO offers of help been rejected for weeks, that's just mere weeks and even in your source, a spokeswoman said it is just “sorting out arrangements.” with WHO and eventually WHO was allowed entry into China. Even the offer of US Scientists were accepted by China. Source: China Accepts Offer for US Scientists to Help Study Coronavirus theepochtimes.com/china-still-hasnt-accepted-offer-for-us-scientists-to-help-study-coronavirus-cdc_3225441.html
    1
  19779.  @Grenadier311  How was Fauci right? I read your source and he doesn't quote any sources, or data, he just claimed that US travel restrictions have worked by comparing USA to Italy, and guess what, USA is now the new epicentre of the global coronavirus pandemic and had more Covid-19 cases than any other nation, even ground zero China. Video: US now has world's most coronavirus cases, surpassing China youtu.be/A8v3GYnlXww 85,505 people in the USA were infected with Covid-19, and at least 1,288 died as of 27th March 27. New research suggests the disease could take more than 80,000 lives in the country. The daily death toll could soar to 2,300 as the US epidemic hits its peak, possibly in April. The outbreak is also ravaging the US economy.
    1
  19780.  @Grenadier311  I remember when the government first began implementing lockdown on Wuhan and many Western countries criticised China and accused us of draconian measures. But now that Covid-19 has hit their shores, countries (like Italy) are resorting to draconian lockdown measures of their own to deal with Covid-19. Source: China's coronavirus lockdown strategy: brutal but effective theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/19/chinas-coronavirus-lockdown-strategy-brutal-but-effective So its not just Chinese government that says one thing and change with the situation. Even some Western countries do the same, after accusing China earlier.
    1
  19781.  @danihoeffnagel2005  Read what I wrote to @Grenadier 144, "China isn't closing our borders completely, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs have decided to temporarily suspend entry of foreigners with currently valid visas and residency permits in China." Video: Coronavirus: China bans most foreign arrivals to block imported cases of Covid-19 youtu.be/2G5wy39zHZc The order does not apply to foreigners who: -hold diplomatic, service or courtesy or C Visas. -come to China for essential economic, trade, scientific or technological activities or out of emergency humanitarian needs -hold visa issued after the announcement. So its not closing off our borders completely.
    1
  19782.  @astro7172  "well ccp here you caught redhanded that you literally purchased the WHO" How is WHO in China's pocket? The USA is largest contributor to WHO, contributing some $400 million to WHO, whereas China only contributes about $40 million to WHO in comparison. Yet Trump still accuse WHO of being China centric? Even when USA is its largest funder?
    1
  19783.  @danihoeffnagel2005  Semantics? I've already shown that Chinese borders aren't completely closed and listed exceptions, so why are you claiming that that China's borders are closed de facto, when the fact that it isn't?
    1
  19784. But frankly speaking, Trump is one of the few U.S presidents to not start a hot war during his term. In fact, Trump facilitated the U.S withdrawal from Afghanistan, although Trump administration didn't carry it out, it was Biden administration that botched the withdrawal. Trump didn't care about Hong Kong, Xinjiang and other internal issues of China, but Biden is pushing for these so-called "human rights" issues in China.
    1
  19785.  @MarkYeung1  Again, it's because China (both the Nationalist and the KMT) stood a fighting chance against Imperial Japan, especially when US joined after Pearl Harbor was bombed, but how does Zelenskyy stand a chance against Putin, given that NATO has refused to put boots on the ground to defend Ukraine, and also refused to impose a No-Fly Zone over Ukraine? Ukraine's membership into NATO is unlikely to happen now, because that would mean NATO is obliged to send troops to defend Ukraine if it were a member, so there's basically no other option for Zelenskyy apart for surrendering Ukraine. But by refusing to surrender, Zelenskyy is prolonging the war and using Ukrainian lives as human shields. By releasing prisoners and arming civilians with rifles, he's sowing chaos and maximizing the civilian casualties. By removing the age restrictions for conscription, Zelenskyy is enlisting child soldiers to fight and die for his refusal to surrender. Again, where's your evidence that Russia lost more than 10000 soldiers? From the Ukrainian sources? Their calculations is just counting the number of vehicles destroyed and multiplying it by the number of soldiers each vehicle can hold, that's not an accurate method of calculating soldiers lost.
    1
  19786.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Zelenskyy was asking for weapons to defend his country." So if Ukraine was winning against Russia, why does Zelenskyy still need more weapons as well as a No-Fly Zone over Ukraine from NATO, if the Ukrainians were winning? If anything, Zelenskyy is like a U.S puppet meant to demand more weapons from NATO so that the U.S military industrial complex can profit from more weapons sales.
    1
  19787.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Has the Russian military industry profitted enough already?" Profit from what? Capturing NATO weapons sent over as lethal aid? "Why did Putin start this war to help the US profitted?" Because if Ukraine joins NATO then that means more US weapons would be deployed to Ukraine to pose an existential threat to Russia.
    1
  19788.  @MarkYeung1  "Someone in here thinks NATO has abandoned Ukraine. Given how much weapons Ukraine has received. Who will agree with him/her?" Zelenskyy literally said those words that NATO has abandoned Ukraine, are you perhaps referring to Zelenskyy when you said that?
    1
  19789.  @okismokipoki  "Russian bear is embarrassing him self In every way, militarily they are an embarrassment to any modern army." That's because you're used to the U.S style of modern warfare, that is to bomb cities to smithereens in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Libya, etc, through Shock & Awe tactics. But Russia's strategy is different from the USA, they want to preserve the civilian infrastructure, that's why Russian forces are proceeding carefully in an attempt to minimize unnecessary civilian deaths.
    1
  19790.  @okismokipoki  I mean, did you hear the news of Russia's hypersonic missile (named: Kinzhal "Dagger") traveling at speeds of up to Mach 10 (or 10x the speed of sound) and striking Ukrainian supply depots with great precision? The missile travels at speeds up to 7,600 mph, so fast that a bubble of plasma forms around the missile and makes it undetectable to RADAR. The current U.S technology isn't even capable of intercepting such a hypersonic weapon, so how is the Russian military embarrassing itself? (Like Russia, China is developing and testing our own hypersonic weapons program. The DF-ZF hypersonic glide vehicle is launched from a DF-17 missile, and is capable of achieving speeds of up to Mach 10 too.)
    1
  19791.  @polqn  Because China is the world's factory, that's why people bring up China. And you know which country has the world's largest prison incarceration rate? It's America, The Land of the Free, and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S governments release convicts on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons.
    1
  19792.  @bapsteratheart  Because those trainees in vocational training centers are in boarding schools, and they can take the weekends off to be at home with their family. The vocational training centers even charter buses to take the trainees home during Saturdays and Sundays, so which prison in the world would allow their inmates to leave the premises?
    1
  19793.  @jamesgathings6364  If you want WHO to help, then why President Trump threatening to cut off funding to World Health Organization, especially in the midst of a global pandemic?
    1
  19794. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19795. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  19796.  @Bingo_Bango_  "Roughly 0% of Chinese own homes. Per the CPC, "ownership" of land is contractual." We're talking about home ownership, why are you talking about land ownership? China has a home ownership rate of around 90%, but when it comes to land ownership, the land belongs to China. The land can be leased to developers for 70 years (residential use) and 50 years (commercial use) and the lease can always be renewed after it expires. As far as I know, there is no limit to the maximum number of times the land lease can be renewed. So if after 70 years, if you still have descendants living on the land, the lease can be renewed. If after another 70 years, if your descendants have descendants, it can be renewed. However, if there's no one remaining (or willing) to look after the land, than the land will be returned to the government to lease out to other developers.
    1
  19797.  @Bingo_Bango_  Now it looks like you're just redefining terms for your own convenience. Land ownership is a different thing altogether from home ownership, and the fact remains that China has a home ownership rate of around 90% according to studies. Switching over to land ownership, if the land has to be taken back, the government offers compensation for loss of land, including resettlement subsidy and compensation for standing crops. Sometimes the compensation offered is not enough and the people may refuse to vacate, and there are cases where almost everyone in a tract of land has relocated except for a single building. These "holdout buildings" are known in China as dīngzihù (钉子户) or "nail houses" because they are stubborn to remove. You can look up videos of these nail houses and sometimes the developer continue to build roads to bend around these lone structures.
    1
  19798.  @Bingo_Bango_  You think 70 years and 50 years are pitiful timescales, then what do you suggest would be an appropriate timescale? 100 years? 200 years? By then who can predict what the circumstances will be like in a century or two's time? The government currently uses a 70 year lease (residence use) probably because that's around the average life expectancy of the people in China, so once the lease expires, the owner (if he's still alive) can apply for renewal, or perhaps his descendants could. For commercial use, it's a 50-year lease because that's probably the expected lifespan of a ordinary business. Construction time and mortgage time is factored into the land lease duration in order to prevent property developers from "holding onto the land" indefinitely. In my view, it's a good thing because even if a property developer goes bankrupt, the half-finished building will not be sitting on land indefinitely. Once the land lease expires, the land could be taken back by the government and repurposed for other uses. It represents a kind of "cycle of renewal" every few decades so that the land will not stagnate.
    1
  19799.  @Bingo_Bango_  You said: "the lease "can" be renewed, but there is no guarantee it "will" be renewed even if the land is in active use." Who can 100% guarantee anything in this world? What happens if you don't pay your property tax in the USA? Answer: Your property gets repossessed by the authorities, until you pay your debt. Doesn't that sound like the government is leasing the land to you? You may feel as though you own the land, but the fact is that you still have to pay the government for the right to own your land. Like I said, all the land belongs to China. Even if the land is in active use, the government still reserves the right to take back the land once the lease expires, if the conditions for renewal are not met. Who knows, you could be selling your property to foreign buyers. Don't people in the West often complain about how Chinese buyers are purchasing property in their lands and driving up property prices? Well, this doesn't happen in China since the government ultimately retains control over the land.
    1
  19800.  @Bingo_Bango_  I simply made a comparison that's all, between property tax and a land lease. But I never redefined terms like home ownership and land ownership. Home ownership rate in China is around 90% according to studies, but you're repeatedly attempting to gaslight here by conflating home ownership with land ownership. When it comes to land ownership, my stance is clear and that all the land belongs to China. You said: "but that China explicitly does things differently" Didn't you remarked earlier that, and I quote your earlier words: "No other "modern" country works like this." so aren't you in fact saying the same thing regarding China and other countries? You said: "I agree, unlike most states the CPC does retain control of the land, not the Chinese people." Of course the Chinese government doesn't control the Chinese people. China's government may own the land, but (believe it or not) it's the Chinese people that own the government in China. China's government is by the people, of the people, for the people. That's why there are 70-year or 50-year land leases to ensure a "cycle of renewal" in order to prevent the land falling into the wrong hands of a few people.
    1
  19801.  @Bingo_Bango_  "but I don't particularly care. I am dragging you back to reality - roughly 0% of Chinese own homes," That's your version of reality. Your reality is seemingly based on redefining terms just to suit your whims. I've already explained that home ownership and land ownership are different, the fact is that China has a home ownership rate of around 90% as shown in studies. But when it comes to land ownership (which is a different thing altogether) my position remains that all the land belongs to China. You said: "China is a country of tenants with a few landed nobility mixed in." Not more of your ramblings. You've previously mentioned this "Chinese state nobility wrote in a loophole for their fellow high-ranking officials to hold land indefinitely,"_ but where is your proof that these people exist? After the 70 or 50 year lease expires, the lease has to be renewed, and unless these so-called Chinese nobility can live forever (or will always have descendants no matter what) then if there is no one available to renew the lease, it will be returned to government and repurposed for other uses. Speaking of the 70-year or 50-year lease, you claim they are pitiful timescales, then pray tell, then what do you suggest would be an appropriate timescale? 100 years? 200 years? You said: "The only reason nail homes can even exist is because of foreign expectations upon China to treat private property investment as valid, but this too is a form of self-delusion." Care to elaborate on what you mean by this? China's nail homes are all owned by local people, so how does this help to convince foreigners? And it seems like if you don't like what I say, you just label it "self-delusion" that's all. You said: "Your comments are especially amusing because foreign property owners of Chinese land have more enumerated rights than Chinese themselves to their own land," Care to elaborate further on this? What additional rights do foreign property owners have over Chinese to our own land? As per my stance, all land in China belongs to China. Foreign property owners are also subject to the 70 or 50 year land lease and if they are unable to meet the conditions for renewal, then that land is returned to China after the lease expires. It's funny how you constantly dismiss my arguments by claiming you don't care, yet when it comes to explaining your own arguments, you appear to be solely lacking in content.
    1
  19802. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19803.  @Bingo_Bango_  "Shenzhou. You have entirely missed the point. I am clarifying that home ownership obviously cannot exist without land ownership." Finally you admit that the two terms are distinct from each other. You've repeatedly claimed that "Roughly 0% of Chinese own homes" which is clearly not reality. I mean, try saying that sentence in China, and 90% of Chinese will think you're crazy. To think that all this time, you've been claiming I'm missing the point, when this is the absurd statement you've been preaching to me all along. Now that the first part is cleared up, let's go over your statement that home ownership cannot exist without land ownership. If your statement was true, then nail houses wouldn't exist. But the presence of nail houses in China proves your statement false, that such people can own the home, but not necessarily the land beneath it (of which my stance is that all land belongs to China). (You're welcome to disagree and try to prove me wrong with the nail houses, but it appears you did not elaborate much the phenomena of nail houses.) You said: "the appropriate timescale is indefinite, with minimal constraint." Indefinite? Who on Earth can promise infinity to anyone? Imagine you're living in a house, and a stranger walks up to you and claims that the land you live own belongs to his great-great-great grandfather and is therefore entitled to live in your property? China's current system of 70 or 50 year land lease is appropriate (for reasons I've repeatedly stated above) because it's represents a cycle of renewal of the land. You said: "Other countries often do ground leases for 99 years," Finally you give a more objective timescale than "indefinite." 99 years is just a few decades more than 70 years, and it's possible that the government might follow other countries and increase it to 99 years, given that more Chinese people are living longer lives.
    1
  19804.  @Bingo_Bango_  "Feel free to argue you should not be permitted to own anything for all your life - I believe you." Aren't you the one repeatedly claiming that "Roughly 0% of Chinese own homes." all this time, and now you want me to argue about it? Haven't I been arguing the opposite that when it comes to home ownership, around 90% of Chinese own our homes? You said: "I am less satisfied with all of the people you are speaking on the behalf of who deserve their shot at being a home owner and not a tenant." Since around 90% of Chinese own our homes, are you perhaps less satisfied with the remaining 10% who don't? Of course I too would also like to see 100% home ownership in China if possible, but the good news is that studies predict that China may be the first country in the world to have reached a 96% urban home ownership rate according to the central bank.
    1
  19805. Kal Kungyab Soviet Russia also held considerable power in the past, was also part of UNSC like USA, but that didn't stop America from traveling halfway across the globe to declare war on communism and spread democracy through proxy wars in Vietnam and Korea. So what's holding back USA this time? As for your question, Life in Tibet is much better today than when it was under Dalai Lama rule. For much of history, Tibet was isolated from the world due to its location in the Himalayas, but thanks to Chinese construction of Qinghai railway through difficult mountaineous terrain, Tibet has become more accessable to the rest of the world, and there is growing tourist industry in Tibet. Farming in Tibet is difficult because of poor mountain soil and low rainfall, so Chinese scientists built special greenhouses to help increase agricultural yield. Tibet also imports food from rest of China to help feed its growing population. The government also help modernize Tibet by building roads, streetlamps, infrastructure, schools and universities as well as modern amenities like water, electricity, gas and plumbing to Tibetan residences. Modern technology is also available to Tibetans in the form of cars, smartphones, computers and Internet access. Thanks to the Internet, Tibetans can browse websites, shop online, make payments and have purchases delivered to their house in Tibet, because it is part of China after all. It is for the above reasons, that's why I believe most Tibetans do not want independence.
    1
  19806. +Kal Kungyab So why USA stopped supporting Tibetan independence once President Nixon visited China? Its because USA recognised China's sovereignty over Tibet in the end. Today, UN countries like USA, UK etc recognise Tibet as part of China today. Tibetans today get special treatment from government as they are exempted from paying taxes. They are free to worship whatever religion they want and can take educational courses in Mandarin and Tibetan. They get free education up to university and enjoy special health care benefits and education bursaries. For example if qualifying for university courses, if Han Chinese need 500 points to qualify, Tibetans need only 300 points (easier) to qualify for same course. When Tibetans get married and start family, they are also exempted from One-Child Policy and can have as many kids as they want. There are numerous benefits afforded to Tibetans that Han Chinese do not get to enjoy, so in what way are Tibetans culturally oppressed? Most Tibetans understand their political situation and know that Tibet wouldn't be able to survive without China.
    1
  19807. +kikivoorburg You mean the government "threatens" other countries using pandas? And other countries actually feel threatened by possible removal of pandas from their zoos? That's a first... As for your 2nd post, if Tibet was independent, that it is unlikely that Tibet will have the necessary funds to develop infrastructure on their own, or to have India or China invest in them. Tibet is located in Himalayas and you think India or China would build a railway through difficult mountainous terrain to access Tibet for free? You think the Qinghai Railway was so easily built? It is world's highest elevation railway passing through permafrost and regions with low oxygen. The passenger carriages have special enriched-oxygen and UV-protection systems to protect its passengers. You think Tibet could afford to pay for this project? You people keep claiming "Most Tibetans want independence" but where did you get such information? Did you interview the people of Tibet personally? It was true that during monasteries were destroyed during Culture Revolution but so did the rest of China suffered and afterwards, the government eventually rebuilt monasteries that were destroyed during those periods. The 14th Dalai Lama was a traitor that conspired with CIA to lead uprising in Tibet in 1959. Normally, Tibetan spiritual leaders supposed be removed from worldly affairs but by getting involved in politics, 14th DL had shown that he is no longer fit to rule Tibet. He abused his religious position to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities. When the uprising failed, he and his followers fled to India as exiles, aided by the CIA. Today, the Tibetans in China live arguably more prosperous lives than the exiled Tibetans, due to the modernization of Tibet. The 14th DL spends money traveling to places to preach, while his followers in India lead harsh lives. The future of Tibetan exiles is uncertain, and the DL is an old man. When he dies of old age, what will happen to the rest of his followers? It is clear that 14th DL doesn't really care about his followers or what the future holds for them.
    1
  19808.  @人间太君  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19809.  @Scambuster491  You said: "It’s highly unlikely that China will be able to surpass Singapore " China is already the world's 2nd largest economy, while Singapore's economy is ranked 37th in the world. China has the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, compared to Singapore's Armed Forces. China has the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, while Singapore's R&D spending is ranked 27th in the world.
    1
  19810.  @chimmichua1986  You said: "and thats why singapore is number 1 on almost all kinds of categories unlike china" China is already the world's 2nd largest economy, while Singapore's economy is ranked 37th in the world. China has the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, compared to Singapore's Armed Forces. China has the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, while Singapore's R&D spending is ranked 27th in the world.
    1
  19811.  @chimmichua1986  China is home to the world's largest high-speed railway (HSR) surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen in terms of track length. List of High-Speed Railway (HSR) Construction by Country (2019) 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. France (3,870 km) 4. Germany (3,596 km) 5. Japan (3,422 km) 6. Russia (2,026 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,997 km) 8. Italy (1,697 km) 9. South Korea (1,481 km) 10. Finland (744 km) ... Source: YouTube: High-Speed Railway (HSR) Construction by Country (1965-2019) Singapore has not HSR to speak of.
    1
  19812. President Xi Jinping may be entering his 3rd term, but former Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms and would have done a 5th if she hadn't voluntarily withdrew her candidacy from the last German election. Yet Western media is claiming Xi is China's leader for life?
    1
  19813.  @chimmichua1986  You said: "Chinese in singapore are of higher quality in terms of education and development" Mainland Chinese students outperformed their Singaporean peers in the 2018 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) in all 3 subjects: Mathematics, Science and Reading. Here's the 2018 PISA ranking for all 3 subjects: 2018 PISA ranking for Mathematics: 1. Mainland China: 591 2. Singapore: 569 3. Macau, China: 558 4. Hong Kong, China: 551 5. Taiwan, China: 531 6. Japan: 527 7. South Korea: 526 8. Estonia: 523 9. Netherlands: 519 10. Poland: 516 ... 2018 PISA ranking for Science 1. Mainland China: 590 2. Singapore: 551 3. Macau, China: 544 4. Vietnam: 543 5. Estonia: 530 6. Japan: 529 7. Finland: 522 8. South Korea: 519 9. Canada: 518 10. Hong Kong, China: 517 ... 2018 PISA ranking for Reading 1. Mainland China: 555 2. Singapore: 549 3. Macau, China: 525 4. Hong Kong, China: 524 5. Estonia: 523 6. Canada: 520 6. Finland: 520 8. Ireland: 518 9. South Korea: 514 10. Poland: 512 ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
    1
  19814.  @雅君墨客-i9z  这两个新加坡人真的以为他们的国家很了不起，还继续看不起中国。
    1
  19815.  @chimmichua1986  "神州 Shenzhou why do u keep switching topics and cannot stand ur ground on points u raise in your argument?" You said: "Chinese in singapore are of higher quality in terms of education and development" but mainland Chinese students outperformed their Singaporean peers in the 2018 PISA ranking. How is that off topic?
    1
  19816.  @Scambuster491  You said: "I thought CCP starts in 1949" The Communist Party of China was founded in 1921, not 1949.
    1
  19817.  @Scambuster491  You don't even know when the Communist Party of China was founded?
    1
  19818.  @Scambuster491  You got your fact wrong yet you're dismissing it as nobody wants to know?
    1
  19819.  @FAILkipedia  Satellite images indicate that Volnovakha and Schastia still have houses intact, what are you talking about? And this mobile crematorium technology, why didn't Russia made use of them to cover up the bodies in Bucca instead of leaving them for the Ukrainians to "discover"? Northern Ukraine is where Ukrainian forces are concentrated to be protect Kiev, why wouldn't Russian forces bring this mobile crematories in the North of Ukraine? And cremating such a huge amount of bodies would produce a visible plume of smoke, yet where is the smoke that indicates such a cremation has happened?
    1
  19820.  @FAILkipedia  Turns out that the Russian mobile crematoriums is fake news. The accompanying video footage of a crematorium on The Telegraph actually dates from 2013 and it was posted by a Russian incinerator construction company and is not footage from the ground. The video isn't even burning corpses they are incinerating garbage. Russian orthodox belief doesn't allow improper burials so what makes you think Russian forces have mobile crematoriums?
    1
  19821.  @FAILkipedia  British website The Telegraph is reporting that Russia is using mobile crematoriums in Ukraine in bid to hide its losses. But the accompanying video footage of a crematorium actually dates from 2013. It was posted by a Russian incinerator construction company and is not footage from the ground
    1
  19822.  @FAILkipedia  "it has been in EVERY city liberated by Ukranian forces so far." So isn't it possible that it's the Ukrainians forces that carried out these atrocities? In Buca, the victims had white armbands signalling that they were pro-Russian, so why'd Russian kill those people friendly to the Russian side?
    1
  19823.  @FAILkipedia  Russia is Orthodox Christian, why would they have mobile crematoriums when it goes against their religious beliefs?
    1
  19824.  @FAILkipedia  Again, you just jump to conclusion that Russia was behind Kramatorsk without proof. Did you know the Ukrainian forces bombed center Donetsks and killed their own civilians? Watch Patrick Lancaster/
    1
  19825.  @FAILkipedia  Turns out that the cluster missile attack on Krematorsk came from the direction of Ukrainian occupied territory, so it was actually the Ukrainians targeting civilians in the train station.
    1
  19826.  @FAILkipedia  Photographs and videos show that the rocket part faces the northeast, which means that the missile may have arrived from the west, southwest or south, which is in the direction of Ukrainian controlled territory such as Dobropillia. And Russian Army has gotten rid of all their Soviet Era Tochka-U missiles, but the Ukrainian forces still this missile. As for the missiles fired from Shakhtarsk, they could be targeting other military targets elsewhere, not the train station in Kramatorsk.
    1
  19827.  @FAILkipedia  Russian forces don't have Tochka-U missiles anymore, it's an old Soviet Era missile that the Ukrainian army still uses. Russia has access to the more powerful Iskander-M missile, why'd would they use an outdated Soviet-era Tochka-U missile that's no longer in their inventory? And the rocket part faces the northeast, which means that the missile was most likely launched from the southwest, which is in the direction of Ukrainian controlled territory such as Dobropillia. The launch of 2 missiles from Shakhtarsk was probably meant to target other military targets. And it turns out that the Russian media made a mistake about the 2 missiles hitting Kramatorsk, so they deleted the incorrect information from their news.
    1
  19828.  @FAILkipedia  According to the serial number of the Tochka-U in Kramatorsk, it can be traced back to the 19th Missile Brigade of Ukrainian Armed Forces. This is reported on Italian media:youtu.be/sWLl0aGQEPw
    1
  19829.  @FAILkipedia  According to the serial number of the Tochka-U in Kramatorsk, it can be traced back to the 19th Missile Brigade of Ukrainian Armed Forces. This is reported on Italian media.
    1
  19830.  @FAILkipedia  You cited the 47 Missile brigade and the 238 Artillery brigade of the 8th Army of Russian Federation still have those Tochka-U, but that's dated to 1 year ago, on 20th of February 2021, and Russian Army has since gotten rid of such missiles. Also you talked about Russian media deleting the message, well, it's because it was a mistake and that's why the posts were taken off the news. Likewise, just minutes after the attack, Donetsk regional head Pavlo Kyrylenko accused Russia of using its Iskander short-range ballistic missile with a cluster munitions warhead. But he later corrected himself, saying that Tochka-U rockets had been used, so mistakes were made and were later corrected isn't it? As for the missile turning 45% that still means it was fired from either the direction of West, SouthWest or South, all of which are from Ukrainian-controlled territory, not Russian controlled territory.
    1
  19831.  @FAILkipedia  Russia's involvement in Syria was in 2015 (7 years ago) and they have since gotten rid of their Tochka-U rockets. Even you cited the 47 Missile Brigade and the 238 Artillery Brigade of the 8th Army of Russian Federation sporting Tochka-U, that was in 2021 (1 year ago) so how does that prove anything? If anything, both of us seem to agree that Ukraine Army still has those Tochka-U in stock.
    1
  19832. ​ @FAILkipedia  I'm pointing out that Russia's involvement in Syria is 7 years ago, and that the two brigades were spotted with Tochka-U 1 year ago (according to the date you stated) and that Russia has since gotten rid of their Tochka-U. But we do know that Ukraine is still using Tochka-U, even both you and I agree on this. "You said that the Serial number is a proof," Did I ever said that the serial number is a proof? Could you quote me my words saying that the serial number is a proof?
    1
  19833.  @FAILkipedia  You said that I said the serial number is a proof, but I never said that. That's why you're unable to quote me my words saying that the serial number is proof, so why are you accusing me of things I never said? "Yeah the childrens and the old people that they killed also were armed eh?" That's because Zelenskyy deliberately release prisoners and distribute rifles to civilians. By removing the age restrictions for conscription, Zelenskyy is also forcing child soldiers and elderly people to fight and die. And which city has been flattened? So far you never actually listed any cities being flattened, you just claim that they are without citing proof. You claimed Mariupol is 90% wiped, with 50,000 civilians killed, but they have a population of over 400,000, so how does that translate to being wiped?
    1
  19834. Perhaps they're feeling a little homesick after living for so long in a foreign land?
    1
  19835.  @fclopez1  Here's a video of modern day Lhasa, Tibet, China (filmed by WildFilmsIndia) and you can see how developed Lhasa has become under communist party rule. Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, and modern technology like cars, telephone cables, computers, smartphones, WiFi, the Internet, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo (By WildFilmsIndia) Even the poorest Tibetan farmer can afford a smartphone, connect to the Internet and shop online in Taobao and have his purchases shipped all the way to Tibet in the Himalayas. Because Tibet is part of China after all.
    1
  19836.  @fclopez1  Video: Tibetan people celebrate China's National Day with flash mob youtu.be/w4_BBzVduSY A flash mob was held in Qamdo, a city located in Tibet Autonomous Region in southwest China, to celebrate the 71st anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China, by singing "My Motherland" in a chorus.
    1
  19837.  @milkybar06  Her resignation does not solve the problem, it only makes the situation worst. Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam should remain in power and clean up this mess she started, not her being given the easy way out by resigning.
    1
  19838. China is experiencing a reverse brain drain due to a combination of Sinophobia in the West as well as China offering developmental opportunities to overseas Chinese.
    1
  19839. David Miller After 4-8 years, President Trump will be forced to step down, and he will no longer be the POTUS. Heck, if Trump's mid term election screw up, or something else happens in the meantime, he may not be POTUS anymore. You are looking short-term instead of long-term here.
    1
  19840. +David Miller But because of your own US laws and the presidential term limit, President Trump will eventually be forced to step down, whether its after 4 years or 8 years or even 10 years. And there is no guarantee that Trump's new bill and laws will remain after he steps down. What if the next POTUS starts reversing Trump's policies, and undoing all that hard work? US presidents can only make short-term plans spanning 4-8 years, because there is no guarantee that they will remain in power after their term ends. But China's political system is different. The government abolished the Chinese president term limit, so our leaders can remain in power to help see our long-term plans come to fruition. The CCP has made many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 15-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc. to map out China's future and direction and to accomplish certain goals by 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc. But where do you see US's future in 10 years time, after Trump steps down? Where do you see America in 20 years time? Your US leaders can't make long-term decisions (spanning more than 10 years) because they will be forced to step down eventually.
    1
  19841. +David Miller You are right that in 10 years, lots of things can happen. But its always good to plan for the future, and where is America's 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 15-year plans, 20-year plans and so on? Where does America see itself in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc? Even if Trump survived 10 years as POTUS, then what happens to in 20 years? Can't you see that constant US elections are not helping USA but hindering it? China has had no free elections, and yet we produced good leaders like Xi Jinping, Deng Xiaoping, etc, that have guided the country to success. Its because our CCP is expected to remain in power for the next 20-30 years, and therefore, able to make long term plans, instead of short term plans.
    1
  19842. +Davide Miller "Whichever’s Country comes out with the best technology that Country will lead the World!" China built the world's fastest supercomputer Sunway Taihulight 神威·太湖之光 and during 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, as compared to USA's 144 out of 500. China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/
    1
  19843. +David Miller China built the world's largest radio telescope, Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope's (FAST) also known as Tianyan 天眼 "Eye of the Heavens" that will help scientists learn more about the universe's early days, detect low-frequency gravitational waves and hunt for signals that may have been produced by distant alien civilizations. China Finishes Building World's Largest Radio Telescope Source: space.com/33357-china-largest-radio-telescope-alien-life.html The larger the radio dish, the more sensitive it is, and FAST's potential to discover an alien civilization will be 5 to 10 times that of current equipment, as it can see farther and darker planets. Since its inception in 2016, China's FAST has discovered 44 pulsars. 44 pulsars identified by China's FAST telescope Video: youtube.com/watch?v=t9nySMjiUzw
    1
  19844. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    1
  19845. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  19846. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  19847. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  19848. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  19849. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  19850. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  19851. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  19852. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  19853.  @DLeong1  Is Cyrus Janssen good at snowboarding as well?
    1
  19854. @mav Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then be default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  19855. @mav "Taiwan ppl do not want to be a part of the mainland.." Do you have actual proof of such a claim?
    1
  19856. @mav So why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations and the World Health Organization? If Taiwan was truly independent with nobody controlling it, then Taiwan should have been a member of the UN and the WHO by now. Unless there's something controlling Taiwan and preventing them from joining UN and WHO.
    1
  19857. @mav So why don't Taiwan join the United Nations and the World Health Organization? Since you claim Taiwan is independent and no one is controlling Taiwan, yet Taiwan is unable to join the UN and WHO? That shows that there's clearly something controlling Taiwan and that Taiwan is not independent. Where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence since you claim it's independent? Who signed it and when was it signed? If not, then since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  19858. @mav How will Taiwan join the United Nations and World Health Organization? You claim that it's independent and that nobody is controlling Taiwan, yet Taiwan has no formal declaration of independence and is unable to join UN or WHO, then why is that so?
    1
  19859.  @记住天安门广场  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a Map of all the territory Taiwan claims (Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  19860.  Ash Xi  You said: "Reunification means mainland belongs to ROC Taiwan." Why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 (1949~) and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan) then, if the mainland belongs to ROC Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet despite all this initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence to rule the mainland, while at the same time, cementing the communists right to rule China. Then why should reunification mean that the mainland belongs to ROC Taiwan, when the KMT couldn't even keep control over the mainland?
    1
  19861.  Ash Xi  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. It was the Mongols who made Inner Mongolia (and Outer Mongolia) part of Yuan Dynasty China themselves. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet and Mongolia centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Xinjiang was part of China since the Han Dynasty (200 BC) and was known as Xiyu (西域). The name "East Turkestan" is a fake name coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists including Nikita Bichurin to replace another Western term, Chinese Turkestan. So there was historically never any country called East Turkestan, it was clearly part of China and still is today under the People's Republic of China.
    1
  19862.  @记住天安门广场  What ancient document are you referring to? Taiwan's own constitution states that Taiwan is part of China and since there's no changes to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. And about the South China Sea, Taiwan literally claims the whole South China Sea. In 1947, the Republic of China 🇹🇼 published the 11 Dash Line claiming the South China Sea. After 1949, the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 modified the claim and removed two daahs to become a 9 Dash Line instead. So you're acknowledging the fact that Taiwan claims the South China Sea through the 11 Dash Line?
    1
  19863.  @记住天安门广场  What makes you think Western society cannot post on Chinese social media?
    1
  19864.  @记住天安门广场  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According to an article by Gregory Clark, all verified eyewitnesses (among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves) say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    1
  19865.  @记住天安门广场  Search for an article entitled: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies (By Gregory Clark)
    1
  19866.  Ash Xi  Mongolia is welcome to challenge China for claims to Tibet, but Mongolia today recognises Tibet as part of China. Just look up the map of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and Tibet is clearly within China's borders. Xinjiang was part of China since before Jesus Christ himself was born, since 200 BC during the Han Dynasty. Even the term "East Turkestan" was coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists including Nikita Bichurin to replace another Western term, Chinese Turkestan. As for the Kingdom of Khotan, they were a separate kingdom from Xinjiang, it was South of Xinjiang. Source: Wikipedia: Kingdom of Khotan I mean, even India today recognises Tibet and Xinjiang as part of China, what more needs to be said? The first Indian PM Nehru, had recognised Tibet as part of China and so does PM Modi today
    1
  19867.  Yellow First  Glad to know you feel that way. More people in Taiwan need to realize that the United States doesn't care about Taiwan, and is merely using the island as a chess piece to contain the mainland's rise. Mainland China has repeated emphasized that our Taiwan compatriots are welcome back to the mainland.
    1
  19868.  Ash Xi  If you claim Taiwan is the real China then why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite these initial advantages, the KMT lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this shows KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China.
    1
  19869.  Ash Xi  So why'd during the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to the Communist Party 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? At the beginning, the communists were out matched by the stronger KMT, who had wealth (taxed from peasants) had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, and nobody expected a Communist victory. Yet fast forward till today and the KMT lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan, then doesn't this prove KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland? While cementing the Communists right to rule China? The Taiwan flag is actually the Republic of China flag 🇹🇼 and if you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  19870.  Ash Xi  Hong Kong has their own flag (Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Hong_Kong ) yet Hong Kong is part of China. I mean, if you claim Taiwan is a country, then why Taiwan can't join the United Nations or the World Health Organization?
    1
  19871.  Ash Xi  Here's Hong Kong Flag 🇭🇰 Emoji. Macau also have their own flag 🇲🇴, and yet both these regions are Special Administrative Regions of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳.
    1
  19872.  Ash Xi  It was United Nations countries that democratically voted to kick Taiwan out of UN seat and to recognise the People's Republic of China as "China". The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the UN General Assembly Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The poll results were as follows: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting ... Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_2758 Since China won two-thirds majority vote, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, recognized the People's Republic of China (PRC) as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" from the United Nations. In other words, your UN countries democratically voted to recognise PRC as China and kick Taiwan out of the UN seat.
    1
  19873.  Ash Xi  Instead of 4 fathers, why not think of it as a family of 4? 3 kids: Hong Kong 🇭🇰, Macau 🇲🇴 and Taiwan 🇹🇼 with one parent, the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳?
    1
  19874.  Ash Xi  If you claim Taiwan 🇹🇼 is a country, then why Taiwan can't join the United Nations or the World Health Organization? Is there some force preventing Taiwan from joining the UN or the WHO? Where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? Previously, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  19875.  Ash Xi  Where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? If not, then since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  19876.  Ash Xi  During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  19877. @mav Both you and Ash Xi claim Taiwan is a country, yet you fail to answer my question of why Taiwan can't join the United Nations or the World Health Organization? Is there some force preventing Taiwan from joining the UN or WHO? Then you'll at least have to admit the fact that Taiwan isn't independent, isn't it?
    1
  19878.  @kulsoomsroya6288  Well said! More people in Taiwan need to wake up and realise that the U.S doesn't care about Taiwan, they only want to use the island as a pawn to contain the mainland's rise that's all. Just take the chaotic withdrawal of U.S Army from Afghanistan, the U.S don't care about its allies, they put their own American interests ahead of their allies.
    1
  19879.  Ash Xi  So you claim Taiwan is independent, then why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations and the World Health Organization? Is there something that's preventing Taiwan from joining the UN and the WHO? Then Taiwan clearly isn't independent, isn't it?
    1
  19880. @mav You said: "prc is blocking its entry" So you admit that there's something blocking Taiwan from joining the UN and the WHO? Then Taiwan is isn't independent, isn't it? All major countries in the world actually recognise the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China, I mean, even Taiwan's current constitution indicates that. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  19881. @mav China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  19882. @mav "神州 Shenzhou same way as normal Chinese citizens cannot post here" What makes you say that? Chinese citizens can post on YouTube through VPN, have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  19883. @mav "神州 Shenzhou deluded .. you need get some help with your milky brain if you believe that" Why are you resort to personal insults against me for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    1
  19884.  Ash Xi  China suffered a lot during the what's called the Century of Humiliation (百年国耻) Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain, even Imperial Japanese made Twenty-One Demands out of China. Imperial Japan committed numerous wartime atrocities like Nanjing Massacre, Unit 731, and comfort women issue. During the Nanjing Massacre, Japanese soldiers butchered Chinese men for sport, and held contest to see who could rack up the most kills. Chinese women were gangaped and killed, their bodies left exposed and mutilated, their crotch bayoneted or having sharp sticks of bamboo shoved in. The young and elderly weren't spared, and Japanese soldiers sliced open the bodies of babies to do them. Japanese forced families to perform acts of incense; Sons were forced to do their mothers and fathers to daughters. Pregnant women were gangaped and had their swollen bellies stabbed, the unborn fetus torn from their wombs and bayoneted right before their eyes. What did Chinese people do to deserve this? All Chinese people wanted to do was to defend our lands, and protect our homes and loved ones from the Japanese invaders, who stole our lands, plundered our wealth, killed our men and gangaped our women.
    1
  19885. @mav "神州 Shenzhou no , you are confused about history and Civilization" Take ancient writing scripts for example and Chinese characters constitute the oldest continuously used system of writing in the world, having been used since 1200 BCE and today, Mandarin Chinese is the most spoken language in the world by number of speakers. Whereas other ancient scripts like Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia) Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered dead languages today, since they are no longer evolving with the times and no new words being added into their vocabulary. (Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_characters )
    1
  19886. @mav "神州 Shenzhou they block Taiwan entry by blocking" It was the United Nations countries that democratically voted to recognize People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 as "China" and to kick the Republic of China 🇹🇼 out of the UN back in 1971. The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the UN General Assembly Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The poll results were as follows: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting Since PRC won the vote with two-thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971 and recognized the People's Republic of China as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" from the UN.
    1
  19887. @mav During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  19888. @mav "no , we definitely should not interfere in.others affairs ... thank you ... go tell that to the overlords in Beijing" China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here as well as interfering in other's affairs.
    1
  19889. @mav "神州 Shenzhou Qing didn't buy anything from the west , he said they have no need for anything... only silver," Because the West truly had nothing of interest to China, then why the British forced China at gunpoint to buy opium from them at gunpoint? It's because the British demand for Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea and porcelain (fine china) was so high that's why Britain waged two bloody wars with China and Hong Kong was taken from China as a British colony to act as a drug distribution hub throughout rest of China.
    1
  19890. @mav "神州 Shenzhou the vote. Under duress" Where does it show that the vote was under duress? The UN countries democratically voted to recognize PRC 🇨🇳 as "China" and to kick ROC 🇹🇼 out of the UN.
    1
  19891. @mav "神州 Shenzhou incorrect , you may then conclude that the English speaking world all belongs to Britain... no , there was no China until the 1900s" Where's your proof for your claims? China has 5,000 years of history, the West calls China as China, but there are many different names of China throughout our long history. The English name "China" is actually derived from the Qin 秦 Dynasty (221 BC).
    1
  19892.  Ash Xi  Since you claim Taiwan is a free independent and sovereign country, then why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations? Is there something that's controlling Taiwan and preventing a so-called "free and independent" country from joining the UN? Then Taiwan is clearly not independent, since there is something controlling it after all.
    1
  19893.  Ash Xi  During Unit 731, Japanese scientists conducted inhuman experiments on Chinese prisoners, including men, women and children. Prisoners were infected with various diseases and then subjected to live vivisection, often without anesthesia. Scientists performed invasive surgeries, organs were removed, limbs amputated and then reattached to opposite sides of the body, all while the subject is alive. Some prisoners even had their stomachs removed and their esophagus reattached to the intestines, presumably to measure how long humans can survive without the stomach. The women had it worst during Unit 731. Prisoners were injected with sexually transmitted diseases and then forced at gunpoint to spread the infection to other prisoners. Women were gangaped and impregnated (sometimes by Japanese themselves) and then vivisected at various stages of their pregnancy to study the effects of diseases on their organs or on the fetus. Some Japanese scientists even gangaped female prisoners and then had experiments conducted on unborn children they fathered with female prisoners there. Imagine if you are woman prisoner in Unit 731. Or you are a man injected with STD and then forced at gunpoint to have sex to spread it to other prisoners? Why not simply inject everyone with STD, instead of forcing prisoners to spread STD by sex? Or imagine having your limbs amputated and reattached to opposite sides of your body, all without anastasia. All Chinese people wanted was to defend our homes and protect our loved ones, but the Japanese invaded our lands, stole our territory, killed our men, gangaped our women and perform inhuman experiments on our childrens.
    1
  19894. @mav China clearly didn't want opium from the West, the Qing authorities even destroyed thousands of smuggled chests of opium from Western smugglers and the British used this as an excuse to wage two Opium Wars with China in order to force China to buy opium from them at gunpoint, because of the British demand for Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea and porcelain.
    1
  19895. @mav Video: The Opium Wars Explained in 13 minutes youtu.be/nDwoBC_DtGc
    1
  19896. @mav Because the Qing Dynasty simply had zero interest in anything that the West had to offer (apart from silver) then why the British forced China to trade? The British couldn't get enough of Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea and porcelain, that's why the British waged two Opium Wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint (which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people).
    1
  19897.  Ash Xi  So why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations since you claim it's a free and independent country? Is there something that's preventing Taiwan from joining the UN? Then Taiwan is clearly not independent if there's something controlling it, isn't it?
    1
  19898.  Ash Xi  If you want to talk about slaves then it's actually India (world's largest democracy) that has 18 million modern slaves - more than 5 times that of any other country, according to Quartz
    1
  19899. @mav But China simply had 0 interest in what the West was offering at that time, then who are the British to force China to trade when we don't want to? Yes, China allows trade of Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, porcelain but in exchange for silver, so what did China do wrong? In all cases China did not want Opium, and opium smugglers had chests of opium confiscated and destroyed (as per Chinese contraband law), but the British used this as an excuse to launch the Opium War on China.
    1
  19900. @mav Video: Opium Wars: Western Powers vs China - Animated History | Past to Future youtu.be/f32MPPBJOjU
    1
  19901. @mav The Fall of the Ming Dynasty was around 1600s to the founding of the Qing Dynasty, and Europe around at that time was beginning their Imperialist conquest of the world. And again, that doesn't change the fact that Qing Dynasty China had absolutely no interest in what the West had to offer, then who are the British to force trade onto China when we weren't willing to buy? China agreed to trade Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea and porcelain in exchange for silver, then who gives the British the right to tell China to buy from the West when China had no interest? Let alone wage two bloody wars and force China to buy opium from them at gunpoint.
    1
  19902. @mav Again, there are so many videos about the Opium Wars and all of them list the same reasons: China did not want anything from the West (apart from silver) and the British couldn't get enough of Chinese silk, tea and porcelain. China agreed to trade those luxury goods in silver, yet the British wages two wars in order to force China to buy opium from them at gunpoint.
    1
  19903. @mav Previously, China was a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past (even during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 era) yet fast forward till today and the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest military, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  19904. @mav If you want to talk about prison populations then it's actually the United States that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate (Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate ).
    1
  19905. @mav If you want to talk about prison populations then it's actually the United States that has the world's largest prison population, not China. And what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Before 2019, everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending money on your tourism industries. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students studying the same topics as their peers. Yet you think Chinese people lack freedoms? Chinese can be found all over the globe, we literally make up 21% of the world's population after all.
    1
  19906. @mav Where's your evidence that China's prison population is 5x that of the United States? The USA has the world's largest prison population like I shown above. And before 2019, Chinese made over 100 million overseas trips, more than any other country in the world, yet you're claiming Chinese people aren't free? As for corruption, it's a universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-corruption campaigns to crackdown on the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign, but after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    1
  19907. @mav Read 《When China Rules the World》 by Martin Jacques, or 《Has China Won?》 by Kishore Mahbubani. It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set and many economists firmly believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's economy sometime in the foreseeable future.
    1
  19908. @mav Those over 100 million overseas trips (the most in world) made by Chinese makes China the world biggest source of international tourists, what makes you think they don't have access to Google, Twitter or even YouTube? And I already linked you a source showing that America has world's largest prison population yet you're claiming that China has 5x that of the States?
    1
  19909. @mav Why The U.S. Has The Largest Prison Population In The World youtu.be/vKoEJUvkfRA
    1
  19910. @mav Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: MBA SKOOL: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of mainland China?
    1
  19911.  @Andy-P  Japan is bound by the WWII surrender treaty (Article 9 of the Japanese constitution) to maintain a self-defense force at all times and to never declare war against another country except for in self-defense. As long as the conflict remained local, then Japan's pacifist constitution would prevent it from getting involved in a conflict between Taiwan and the mainland. If the USA choose to impose a blockade on China, they would be strangling their allies, Japan and S.Korea at the same time, since their maritime trade routes also run through the South China Sea. If USA choose to implement a blockade enforced by submarines, long-range air power, and mines, the blockade would also lose much of its ability to differentiate between neutral and enemy commerce. 80% China's oil comes from the Gulf, which is why China is building overland trade routes through the Belt and Road Initiative to help reduce China's reliability on maritime trade, where the US Navy is supreme. Lastly, Taiwan should learn lessons from the US withdrawal from Afghanistan, that USA don't really care about the people of Taiwan, and the USA is using Taiwan as a pawn to contain China's rise. The USA is all about "America First" and putting American interests ahead of its allies. US's NATO allies had gotten a taste of this in Afghanistan, so would they want to risk their soldiers lives again, joining the USA in a potential conflict between Taiwan and the mainland?
    1
  19912.  @GooseGander  The might US army losing the Afghan War to a bunch of insurgents is not the only example. The might US army also lost the Vietnam War to a bunch of dirt-poor, starving Communist peasants. It just goes to show that just because you have a higher military spending doesn't necessarily mean your country will win the war.
    1
  19913.  @GooseGander  The North Vietnamese were supported by China. Ho Chih Minh had requested Chinese Anti-Aircraft Artillery (AAA) units in a meeting with Mao in May 1965. In response, People’s Liberation Army (PLA) forces began flowing into North Vietnam in July 1965 to help defend Hanoi and its major transportation systems. The total number of Chinese troops in North Vietnam between June 1965 and March 1968 amounted to over 320,000. In the same year the PLA and People's Army of Vietnam (PAVN) & Viet Cong (VC) made an agreement under which the PLA provided the PAVN/VC with 5,670 sets of uniforms, 5,670 pairs of shoes, 567 tons of rice, 20.7 tons of salt, 55.2 tons of meat, 20.7 tons of fish, 20.7 tons of sesame and peanuts, 20.7 tons of beans, 20.7 tons of lard, 6.9 tons of soy sauce, 20,7 tons of white sugar, 8,000 toothbrushes, 11,100 tubes of toothpaste, 35,300 bars of soap, and 109,000 cases of cigarettes Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/China_in_the_Vietnam_War#Confronting_U.S._escalation From 1964 to 1975, China had supplied Vietnam with military aid such as 1,922,897 Guns, 64,529 Artillery pieces, 1,048,207,000 Bullets, 17,074,000 Artillery shells, 30,808 Radio transmitters, 48,922 Telephones, 560 Tanks, 164 Planes, 15,771 Automobiles. China at that time was also a dirt-poor country ourselves and yet the mighty US Army lost the Vietnam War against a bunch of dirt-poor, communist peasants? It just goes to show that just because you have a higher military spending doesn't necessarily mean your country will win the war.
    1
  19914.  @GooseGander  The Americans dropped napalm bombs (remember 'Napalm Girl' photo? Who had her clothes burnt off and was running naked in the streets?) and torched Vietnamese villages to the ground. The Americans sprayed chemical defoliants like Agent Orange which cause birth deformities in Vietnamese children even 40 years after, and the US soldiers slept with Vietnamese women and impregnated them, and then pulled out of South Vietnam and abandoned them to their fate. Their offspring of such dalliances aren't even granted US citizenship. Video: How Nick Ut's Photo 'Napalm Girl' Changed The Vietnam War youtu.be/2FrVpX-E0kI (Video Requires Age Confirmation) Video: Vietnam 40 years after: Children of Agent Orange youtu.be/at2AcXii-YQ
    1
  19915.  @Wise101  The Uighur population in China has actually grown, how's that a genocide?
    1
  19916.  @oleksii_klochko  As I've mentioned earlier, Ukraine lost its sovereignty during the 2014 Maiidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) and ousting Viktor Yanukovych and replacing him with a US pupet. As for Crimea, we need to look at history. Crimea was historically part of Russia before being transferred to Ukraine to celebrate the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's reunification with Russia in the Soviet Union. The people of Crimea are predominantly Russian and many of them have family and ties to Russia. After the USSR dissolved in 1991, Ukraine became independent, and Crimea was supposed to become the Republic of Crimea. A 1991 referendum with Crimean authorities pushing for more independence from Ukraine and closer links with Russia. Because many Crimeans had familial roots to Russia. But the Republic of China was forcibly abolished by Ukraine and Crimea became part of Ukraine. So it shows Crimea wanted to be independent and closer to Russia, but Ukraine would not permit it. The 2014 Maiidan Revolution that ousted Yanukovych sparked demonstrations in Crimea against the new Ukrainian government. Crimea wanted no part of the chaos unfolding in Kiev, so they held a referendum in which the overwhelming majority (96%) of Crimeans voted to join the Russian Federation. So Russia complied with the principle of the self-determination of the people and made Crimea part of Russia. As for the term "invasion" it should be noted that the Russian Black Navy Fleet was already stationed in Sevastopol in accordance with a 1997 treaty, so how can it be considered an invasion when Russian forces were already present in Crimea prior to 2014?
    1
  19917.  @brianbetz7030  "Rule No. 3: Don't pay attention to messages from single use spacecraft." What are you talking about? The Starliner astronauts now trapped on board the ISS with no way to come back to Earth?
    1
  19918.  @duncansmith7576  Russia did not start the war. It all began with the 2014 Maiidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) which ousted Viktor Yanukovych and replacing him with a US pupet. Even since then, Ukraine lost it's sovereignty and has been shelling Donetsk and Lughansk (collectively Donbas region). According to UN Figures, in the 8 years of the War in Donbas, some 14 000 people have been killed in the Donbas Region.
    1
  19919.  @ualaw77  It's typical of the West to make such informal verbal promises to others and then suddenly turn about and refuse to recognise their spoken words. And different standards exist when you complain about Russian "aggression" while ignoring NATO expanding eastwards right up to Russia's doorstep. You refuse to consider the other sides point of view and constantly paint them as the aggressors while ignoring their concerns of NATO expansion. Would the US have tolerated Cuba joining the Warsaw Pact? Of course not, and neither with Russia tolerate Ukraine joining NATO. For decades, Russia's concerns have largely fallen on deaf ears in the West, until the Russian President had no choice but to make his move.
    1
  19920.  @oleksii_klochko  "Shenzhou. NATO is defensive alliance, it's a fact." NATO is NOT a defensive alliance. They can attack other countries without first being attacked themselves. Yugoslavia did not attack any NATO member and Article 5 wasn't activated. Yet Yugoslavia was bombed by NATO in 1999, which goes to show that NATO can attack any country it pleases, regardless of whether it was in self-defence or not. So Russia will not permit Ukraine to join NATO, much like how USA will not allow Cuba to join Warsaw Pact for the same reason.
    1
  19921.  @duncansmith7576  "Shenzhou. Russia clearly did start the war and the previous invasions. But tell me how th US orchestrated Maidan??" The Russo-Ukraine conflict began on Feb 2014, not Feb 2022. In 2014, there was the Maidan Revolution, which ousted the pro-Russian Ukraine President Yanukovych. We know it was the US that was behind this from leaked audio recordings, featuring the voice of US official Victoria Nuland talking with US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt. Nuland and Pyatt discuss who they think should be the next Ukrainian president after Yanukovych. The candidate that they preferred turned out to be the next President of Ukraine. Seems rather convenient won't you agree?
    1
  19922.  @duncansmith7576  "But tell me how th US orchestrated Maidan??" There were leaked audio recordings featuring the voice of US official Victoria Nuland talking with US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt. Nuland and Pyatt discuss who they think should be the next Ukrainian president after Yanukovych. And it turns out that candidate that they preferred turned out to be the next President of Ukraine. I would recommend watching Oliver Stone's documentary titled: Ukraine On Fire (available on YT) to get a better understanding of background of the Maidan Revolution.
    1
  19923.  @JimLecka  My reasoning as to why the Soviet Union needed a blue water navy, was that it saw such a fleet as necessary in order to defend its Soviet allies. Also, no matter how big your Navy truly is, it's not possible to bring the entirely of your navy into a single naval battle. Despite US Navy being larger, not every US warship can be deployed to Soviet waters because of logistical constraints, so its possible to have naval scenarios where Soviet warships outnumber that of the US within Soviet waters. Therefore, I believe it's not a waste to have a "second best navy" as you put it.
    1
  19924.  @JimLecka  I find it strange that on one hand, you claim Russians are "quite xenophobic" on the surface, yet on the other hand, you claim Russians have the dream of "world conquest"? How do the two fit each other? Meanwhile, it's the U.S Navy that's sailing all over the world, even into Russian waters (and also Chinese waters for that matter) yet you see it as a "responsible for keeping the sea lanes open." It just goes to show that you are projecting those Western actions onto that of Russia that's all. It's no wonder why Putin told Biden: "Don't be mad at the mirror if you are ugly." (Russian proverb).
    1
  19925.  @duncansmith7576  ​_"But tell me how th US orchestrated Maidan??"_ There were leaked audio recordings featuring the voice of US official Victoria Nuland talking with US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt. Nuland and Pyatt discuss who they think should be the next Ukrainian president after Yanukovych. And it turns out that candidate that they preferred turned out to be the next President of Ukraine. I would recommend watching Oliver Stone's documentary titled: Ukraine On Fire (available on YT) to get a better understanding of background of the Maidan Revolution.
    1
  19926.  @duncansmith7576  "But tell me how th US orchestrated Maidan??" There were audio recordings featuring the voice of US official Victoria Nuland talking with US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt. Nuland and Pyatt discuss who they think should be the next Ukrainian president after Yanukovych. And it turns out that candidate that they preferred turned out to be the next President of Ukraine. I would recommend watching Oliver Stone's documentary titled: Ukraine On Fire (available on YT) to get a better understanding of background of the Maidan Revolution.
    1
  19927.  @duncansmith7576  "But tell me how th US orchestrated Maidan??" There were audio recordings featuring the voice of US official Victoria Nuland talking with US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt. I would recommend watching Oliver Stone's documentary titled: Ukraine On Fire (available on YT) to get a better understanding of background of the Maidan Revolution.
    1
  19928.  @duncansmith7576  "But tell me how th US orchestrated Maidan??" Audio recordings featuring the voice of US official Victoria Nuland talking with US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt. They discuss who should be the next leader of Ukraine, and it turned out that the candidate that they preferred, ended up being the next President of Ukraine afterwards.
    1
  19929.  @oleksii_klochko  "Shenzhou. NATO 'attack' on Yugoslavia was a peacekeeping mission." NATO cannot be called a "defensive organization" if they can attack another country without first being attacked first. Who gave NATO the right to intervene militarily in another country's affairs? You mean NATO can just pick any country and get involved in militarily? Then it's clearly NOT a defensive organization unlike you claimed earlier.
    1
  19930.  @oleksii_klochko  "It ended the brutal war, and inflicted minimum damage on civilian infrastructure." NATO's bombing of Yugoslavia killed between 489 – 528 civilians. The bombing caused damage to bridges, roads and railway tracks, as well as to 25,000 homes, 69 schools and 176 cultural monuments. Furthermore, 19 hospitals and 20 health centers were damaged, including the University Hospital Center Dr Dragiša Mišović. NATO bombing also resulted in the damaging of medieval monuments, such as Gračanica Monastery, the Patriarchate of Peć and the Visoki Dečani, which are on the UNESCO's World Heritage list today. Yet there is no punishment being meted out for these atrocities.
    1
  19931.  @oleksii_klochko  As I've mentioned earlier, Ukraine lost its sovereignty during the 2014 Maidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) and ousting Viktor Yanukovych and replacing him with a US pupet. As for Crimea, we need to look at history. Crimea was historically part of Russia before being transferred to Ukraine to celebrate the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's reunification with Russia in the Soviet Union. The people of Crimea are predominantly Russian and many of them have family and ties to Russia. After the USSR dissolved in 1991, Ukraine became independent, and Crimea was supposed to become the Republic of Crimea. A 1991 referendum with Crimean authorities pushing for more independence from Ukraine and closer links with Russia. Because many Crimeans had familial roots to Russia. But the Republic of China was forcibly abolished by Ukraine and Crimea became part of Ukraine. So it shows Crimea wanted to be independent and closer to Russia, but Ukraine would not permit it. The 2014 Maidan Revolution that ousted Yanukovych sparked demonstrations in Crimea against the new Ukrainian government. Crimea wanted no part of the chaos unfolding in Kiev, so they held a referendum in which the overwhelming majority (96%) of Crimeans voted to join the Russian Federation. So Russia complied with the principle of the self-determination of the people and made Crimea part of Russia. As for the term "invasion" it should be noted that the Russian Black Navy Fleet was already stationed in Sevastopol in accordance with a 1997 treaty, so how can it be considered an invasion when Russian forces were already present in Crimea prior to 2014?
    1
  19932.  @oleksii_klochko  "Shenzhou. Considering the source of those data it's ok to divide them by 10." On what grounds? We're talking about actual destruction of hospitals, schools and health centers by NATO.
    1
  19933.  @oleksii_klochko  During the NATO's bombing of Yugoslavia, the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade was targeted, resulting in the deaths of 3 Chinese journalists. The victims of the 1999 Chinese embassy in Belgrade bombing were Xu Xinghu and his wife Zhu Ying, and Shao Yunhuan.
    1
  19934.  @duncansmith7576  If so, then why is it that the preferred candidate did eventually become the next President of Ukraine?
    1
  19935.  @JimLecka  Fear of Mongols? The Wall Street Journal article titled: Russia’s Turn to Its Asian Past. (dated July 6, 2018) depicted the Russian President dressed as a Mongol warrior, literally comparing him to Genghis Khan, are you sure it's not the West that subconsciously have this unresolved fear of Mongols within their minds? You keep on saying that Russian have a dream of world conquest, yet under Breton Woods, it is U.S warships that are patrolling the world's sea lanes and slowly encroaching onto Russian waters (and also Chinese waters) so what's the reasoning behind the double standards? US warships are all over the world, but you don't see it as world conquest. Instead, the Soviet Union's "second best navy" (which you claim is a waste of resources) is a manifestation of Russians "dream of world conquest"?
    1
  19936.  @JimLecka  But the Soviets never did attack. All this is just seemingly your own predictions of Russian behavior, which never came true in the end. In fact, during the Cold War, the world came really, really close to outright nuclear war, but it was thanks to the actions of a Soviet submarine officer, Vasily Arkhipov. US warships were dropping depth charges around his submarine, and the Soviet submarine commander thought initially that the war had started and they were under attack. Activation of the sub's nuclear weapons required the consent of all three officers, but it was thanks to Arkhipov's refusal that nuclear war was narrowly avoided.
    1
  19937.  @JimLecka  Fear of Mongols? The Wall Street Journal literally compared the Russian President to Genghis Khan, depicting him dressed as a Mongol warrior, are you sure you're not describing the Western mind here instead of the Russian mind? You keep claiming Russians have a dream of conquest, yet under Bretton Woods, its US warships that are sailing all over the world, encroaching onto Russian waters (and Chinese waters too) while the Soviet Union had a navy that was described by you as "second best" and a "waste of resources".
    1
  19938.  @JimLecka  Fear of Mongols? The Wall Street Journal literally compared the Russian President to Genghis Khan, are you sure you're not describing the Western mind here instead of the Russian mind? Why would the Western media depict him dressed as a Mongol warrior, if not from having an unresolved subconscious fear of Mongols themselves?
    1
  19939.  @ualaw77  I never said Cuba wasn't an ally of the Soviet Union, it was indeed a Soviet ally. But you're talking about "defensive alliances" and which defensive alliance did Cuba join? In Ukraine's case, they are attempting to join NATO (which isn't even "defensive" in nature) and Russia would not tolerate it. It would be the same as if Cuba had joined the Warsaw Pact, because the US will not tolerate its joining.
    1
  19940.  ik ben  "神州 Shenzhou China is “prosperous” because of Xinjiang not the other way around." In the past, the Ancient Silk Road was lucrative trading route and Xinjiang was indeed a strategic location along the route. Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by rest of the world, and along the Silk Route, Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china) were made available to the West. However, in modern times, the shipping industry is what makes countries rich nowadays. Overland routes through Xinjiang became less popular, and sea routes, through Hong Kong, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou and other Chinese port cities on Eastern China shorelines are what made China prosperous today, and popularity of trade through Xinjiang has declined. So Chinese government is actually reviving the ancient silk road to help develop Xinjiang today.
    1
  19941.  @MaFia_1Q  Education is compulsory in China, and all citizens must attend school for at least nine years, known as the nine-year compulsory education, which is funded by the government. Compulsory education includes six years of primary education, starting at age six or seven, and three years of junior secondary education (junior middle school) for ages 12 to 15.
    1
  19942.  @MaFia_1Q  China is providing free education to Uighur children in kindergartens, where they will learn Mandarin Chinese and glorious Chinese history and sing patriotic songs about China. I mean, don't American kids also learn English at school, learn American history and sing patriotic songs about America? Even the Native American kids?
    1
  19943.  @SpiritsBB  "神州 Shenzhou There's got to be a better way though." If you are critical of China's methods, then what exactly do you propose to solve the problem? Look at the West and the estimated 4,000 Westerners joining ISIS and what's the West doing about it? Nothing! If you do nothing about it then obviously, nothing will change.
    1
  19944.  @junkyardjustice5419  China does not claim the East Philippines Sea, we only claim the South China Seas. Philippines is always welcome to claim the sea to the East of Philippines if it wants.
    1
  19945.  nizam88  The Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens and education is mandatory in China. All citizens must attend school for at least nine years, known as the nine-year compulsory education, which is funded by the government. Compulsory education includes six years of primary education, starting at age six or seven, and three years of junior secondary education (junior middle school) for ages 12 to 15. Since they are Chinese citizens, then what's wrong with teaching Uighurs Mandarin Chinese, Chinese history and singing patriotic songs about China? Don't American school kids also learn English at school, American history and sing patriotic songs about America?
    1
  19946.  @abuameen435  "Islamphobia" was not created overnight, it was built up by decades (even centuries!) of negative actions taken by Islamic invasion and extremist activities, and culminated into what it is today. I did not personally create the bad reputation of Islam, Islam did all of it by itself.
    1
  19947.  @abuameen435   Then how to get rid of those black sheep present within Islam? Nobody else is willing to do anything about it, and they just let Islamic extremism pop up and continue to grow. China is actively nipping this problem in the bud by educating Uighurs in Xinjiang (whom are Chinese citizens by birth) and steering them away from extremist thoughts, so that they can graduate from school to become productive members of society. Why can't the government do that? Nobody else in the world, seems to be doing anything about Islamic terrorism.
    1
  19948.  nizam88   Why is forcing them wrong? Education is mandatory in China and all citizens must attend school for at least nine years, known as the nine-year compulsory education, which is funded by the government. Compulsory education includes six years of primary education, starting at age six or seven, and three years of junior secondary education (junior middle school) for ages 12 to 15. Didn't I mention this previously? Did you read what I wrote before commenting here?
    1
  19949.  nizam88  I already mentioned previously that under traditional Uighur culture, some parents refuse to send their kids to school to receive a proper education, so why can't the government send them to Chinese school? Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth so what's wrong with teaching Uighur Mandarin Chinese, Chinese history and culture? China is atheist country so what's wrong with cultivating atheist beliefs within our kids? Look at Islamic countries and they teach Islam to their kids, so why can't China teach Chinese culture in our schools you tell me?
    1
  19950.  @kingofmaiars  What exactly does showing emotions contribute to this discussion? Discussions are better off based on logic not emotions. Look at you resorting to using profanities in your post. How does using expletives help argue your point? I personally do not resort to hurling insults and vulgarities against others, just because their views differ from mine, so why should I become emotional during these discussions then? You have no proof of your claims of the government teaching Uighur children to love the CCP, so you use "feeling in your f**king bones" to justify your claims? How exactly does that help to prove your point you tell me? The Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth, and they are being taught to love China, their homeland so what's wrong with what's the government doing?
    1
  19951.  @kingofmaiars "The real china died with the nationalists in the 40s" During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were crappy and they had far fewer numbers (only 50 communist members in 1921) than the Nationalist Kuomintang. The KMT on the other hand, enjoyed massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training, and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland. So why do you claim that the real China died with the Nationalists in the 40s?
    1
  19952.  @kingofmaiars  The Nationalist KMT lead Chiang kai-shek didn't even want to fight the Japanese force, when they invaded Manchuria, until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap Chiang and force him to ally with the communists in a united front against the Japanese. This "kidnapping" was later known as the Xi'an Incident (西安事變) Source: Wikipedia: Xi'an Incident So please don't act as though the Nationalists had to defend the country, when their leader didn't even want to meet the Japanese invaders and only wanted to continue killing communists (who were Chinese citizens all the same) Why attack your own kind when there is an invader in our lands?
    1
  19953.  @lorenmiller3797  "But... will China ever succeed at building a stateless, classless, moneyless society?" Who knows whether China may succeed in the future. But if anything, Chinese are adaptable, and most likely China might attain a state that's very close to communism. Kinda like "Communism with Chinese Characteristics"
    1
  19954. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China. Even Taiwan's own constitution says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been an amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  19955. Taiwan is an inseparable part of China. Even Taiwan's own constitution says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been an amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  19956. Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, even it says that Taiwan is part of China
    1
  19957.  @christopherhamlin6139  More people in Taiwan need to wake to the fact that the U.S don't care about the people of Taiwan, so long as they can use the island as a chess piece to contain the mainland's rise.
    1
  19958.  @noobacegamer6255  and a sincere good luck to the heatwave sweeping across Europe, inflation and rising gas and fuel prices, resignation of leaders, and covid killing the elderly and vulnerable in the West. Europe is a great region. A sincere good luck to the majority of people living in Europe and not these internet keyboard warriors.
    1
  19959.  @christopherhamlin6139  Plagiarism? I'm not writing a thesis but citing actual evidence here that North Vietnam PM Pham had recognised the Spratly and Paracel Islands as within Chinese territorial waters in his diplomatic letter to Chinese Premier Zhou. Also, did you not know that the independent arbitral tribunal that ruled on the South China Sea isn't even an official UN agency?
    1
  19960.  @christopherhamlin6139  I've already shown that China provided a king's ransom of aid from weapons, ammo, artillery pieces and shells, explosives, food, fuel and everything needed to the Viet Minh forces to help them fight for independence. If anything, Ho Chih Minh literally owes China a debt that they can never repay, of which China never even collected!
    1
  19961.  @77陈-t6b  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19962.  @TheFlame234  "are you serious? The boat that they infamously sank during covid." What's the name of this boat that was infamously sunk?
    1
  19963.  @50centswarlord  For those Chinese in Singapore, what does it say under RACE in your ID card? Chinese right?
    1
  19964.  munchkin42  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    1
  19965.  @kungflunazi9445  1 billion? China's population is 1.4 billion, you're saying nearly 2/3 of Chinese people's organs are harvested? Where do you get your statistics?
    1
  19966.  @kungflunazi9445  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  19967.  @kungflunazi9445  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  19968.  @kungflunazi9445  "神州 Shenzhou DECOUPLE FROM CHINA" You should start at home. Gather all your Made-in-China products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, TVs, refrigerators, etc and throw them away. Check all your electronics, devices, appliances, vehicles whether they contain Made-in-China parts and remove them. You can keep all the non-Made-in-China parts and see if your devices still function.
    1
  19969.  @everythingandmore5537  You said: "Why not the ccp come out with their own report instead of asking people to visit Xinjiang." Would the Westerners accept a report published by the Communist Party of China that there are no human rights violations in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region? Then why should China publish a report? And China even invited Mike Pompeo to visit Xinjiang and see for himself that there are no human rights violations in Xinjiang, but Pompeo declined the invitation. Source: China Invites Pompeo to Visit Xinjiang, Says There Are No Rights Abuses newsweek.com/china-invites-mike-pompeo-visit-xinjiang-no-rights-abuses-1518294
    1
  19970.  @everythingandmore5537  "However, the CCP rule will be history soon." Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    1
  19971.  @kungflunazi9445  Simply put Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou on the first flight back to China if you want China to consider releasing the two Canadians.
    1
  19972.  @kungflunazi9445  Have you destroyed all your Made-in-China products like smartphones, computers, electronics, TVs, appliances, etc? Even those containing Made-in-China components, especially rare earth metals (of which China controls 90% of all rare earth metals production) found in computer memory, DVDs, hard disks, digital cameras, magnets, lasers, fiber optics, fluorescent lighting, LEDs, flat screen TVs, monitors, rechargeable batteries, solar panels, wind turbines, jet engines, rocket engines, superconductors, etc. Every product ever containing rare earth metals from China, be sure to dispose of them if you want to decouple from China.
    1
  19973.  @everythingandmore5537  "神州 Shenzhou The CCP and chinas economy is not the same thing." It is, because China's economy is state-controlled, so CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China? The Communist Party of China defends China's interests in 1. South China Sea The US warships and aircraft carriers are sailing halfway across the globe to South China Sea, so China is taking actions to defend China's sovereignty. 2. India Border Even Indian PM Narendra Modi publicly stated that "Chinese troops did not enter Indian territory and no posts were taken." so the belligerence started on the Indian side and China is defending our sovereignty along the Sino-Indian border. Source: 'China did not enter our territory, no posts taken’: PM at all-party meet on Ladakh clash hindustantimes.com/india-news/chinese-troops-did-not-enter-our-territory-says-pm-modi-at-all-party-meeting-on-ladakh-standoff/story-QGgGUyL3sVRYB7mp3Y8bBI.html 3. Xinjiang The Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (national language of China) Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth and they learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America. Previously, Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region used to be plagued by terrorist attacks perpetrated by misguided Ughurs such as the 1992 Ürümqi bombings, the 1997 Ürümqi bus bombings, the 2010 Aksu bombing, the 2011 Hotan attack, 2011 Kashgar attacks, and the 2014 Ürümqi attack But thanks to the government program in Xinjiang, there have been no more terrorist attacks in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region since. 4. Sino-British declaration in HK During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us. 5. Taiwan Go and read Taiwan's constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, the South China Sea) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of territory that Taiwan claims as their own. wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg 6. Etc
    1
  19974.  @everythingandmore5537  Mike Pompeo declined China's invitation to visit Xinjiang, the EU diplomats declined China's invitation to visit Xinjiang, then the problem clearly lies in Western MSM accusing China of human rights violations in Xinjiang, but refusing to accept China's invitation to visit the region and see for themselves that there are no human rights violations in Xinjiang.
    1
  19975.  @everythingandmore5537  China has invited the UN human rights chief to visit Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. Source: China invites UN rights chief to visit Xinjiang aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/china-invites-un-rights-chief-to-visit-xinjiang/2155649 “China has sent invitations to the high commissioner of the UN for human rights about a trip to China and Xinjiang,” Foreign Ministry Spokesman Wang Wenbin told a news conference in Beijing. What more do you want? China invited Mike Pompeo to visit Xinjiang, he declined, China also invited EU diplomats to visit Xinjiang, they declined, yet you still blame China for not inviting people to visit Xinjiang?
    1
  19976.  @everythingandmore5537  "神州 Shenzhou Ordinary Chinese are sick and tired of the CCP self importance." A long term Harvard University study has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. Source: Harvard survey finds Chinese satisfaction with govt rises china.org.cn/china/2020-07/17/content_76281590.htm So what makes you think ordinary Chinese are sick and tired of the CPC? …… You said: "If South Korea and Japan can live without a single party running the country then so can china." Excuse me, but China clearly isn't South Korea or Japan, neither are those countries China, so why are you applying a cut-and-paste comparison and expecting China to follow in South Korea's and Japan's footsteps when we are all different countries? You can't just superimpose one country onto another and expect the results to be the same. And the fact remains that China's economy is larger than South Korea and Japan, why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    1
  19977.  @everythingandmore5537  So since according to Harvard University study, majority of Chinese citizens's lives have vastly improved from since 30 years ago, then what's wrong with giving credit to the Communist Party of China, where credit is due? It's like, why is it unfathomable to you that majority of Chinese citizens actually support the CPC, because of how much life has improved in China? The simple fact that 10% of Chinese citizens don't support the CPC, already throws your theory out the window, since they weren't satisfied, yet what makes you claim that Chinese citizens definitely say for the government? And is the simple fact that our lives vastly improved from since 30 years ago under the leadership of the CPC really beyond your understanding?
    1
  19978.  @everythingandmore5537  So China has been sending invitations to Mike Pompeo, EU diplomats and now the UN Human Rights Chief to visit Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region and see for themselves that there are no human rights violations in Xinjiang, yet why did Pompeo and EU diplomats declined China's invitation? Yet you're blaming China time and time again?
    1
  19979.  @everythingandmore5537  Mike Pompeo and EU diplomats declined China's invitation to visit Xinjiang, because they know that their mountain of lies would be exposed and collapsed had they accepted China's invitation, that's why they declined China's invitation in order to continue their lies. Yet Westerners still gullibly believe Western anti-China propaganda, when Xinjiang is clearly open for foreigners to visit?
    1
  19980.  @everythingandmore5537  Many Chinese have literally visited Xinjiang and see what life really like there, yet Mike Pompeo and EU diplomats declined China's invitation to visit Xinjiang and just blindly believe Western anti-China MSM that's all, yet you claim Westerners know more about Xinjiang than Chinese who live here? Also, what do you mean by "Those older Chinese know they are lies"? Most older Chinese actually support the Communist Party of China more than the younger folk, like the Harvard University study showed, the older folk experienced vast improvements to their lives the past 30 years, what makes you claim most older Chinese think the CPC is lying?
    1
  19981.  @everythingandmore5537  The past 30 years of improvements have occurred under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, so why can't the CPC take credit? The CPC is the only party in power in China, of course they take credit and blame for all the good and bad things happening in China. But in the US two-party rule, the Republicans and Democrats constantly sabotage each other's plans and blame the other side for America's woes.
    1
  19982.  @everythingandmore5537  Why can't the CPC take credit for the vast improvement of people's lives over the past 30 years? You just refuse to give credit where credit is due that's all. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, until the Communist Revolution changed China into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. 1. Century of Humiliation During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us. …… 2. CIA infiltration Did you know that the 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and a traitor to his people? The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government (Beijing). Declassified CIA files have exposed that a total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) Source: CIA Tibetan program wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Costs So here we have concrete evidence that the 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the USA to engage in separatist activities against the Central People's Government. What makes you think CIA infiltration is a myth, when the evidence comes from de-classified CIA files? 3. South China Sea China first claimed South China Sea Islands back in 1947 when Republic of China 🇹🇼 published the 11 Dash Line (which the 9 Dash Line by People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 is based upon). Nobody objected to China's claim, not Vietnam, not Philippines, not even the USA. The USA even donated warships like USS Decker to help ROC reclaim the South China Sea Islands, the warship was renamed ROCS Taiping 太平 under Chinese navy. One of the the South China Sea Islands was even renamed Taiping Island in honor of the warship that liberated it from Japanese control after WWII. 4. Chinese Civil War Why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, and solidifies the Communists right to rule the mainland. 5. Etc (What's the point of putting "Etc" as a point? You got issues, name them rather than just claim Etc.) Why should Chinese people overthrow our government? The CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China?
    1
  19983.  @everythingandmore5537  Why does China even need to hold democratic election, when Harvard University study has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China? China is clearly doing the right thing and on the right path to success, why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    1
  19984.  @everythingandmore5537  Harvard University held long term study for 10 years, why is there a need to adopt Western brand of democracy, when China is flourishing under our own political system? You're not even Chinese citizen yourself, yet you keep saying "Most ordinary Chinese this, most ordinary Chinese that" who gives you the right to tell Chinese how to govern our country?
    1
  19985.  @everythingandmore5537  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty China and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Also, what do you mean just because Qing Dynasty is non-Han dynasty suddenly means that Tibet wasn't part of China? After conquering "China proper", the Manchus identified their state as "China" (中國, Zhōngguó; "Middle Kingdom"), and the emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, Tibet and other areas) as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that "China" only meant Han areas. The Qing emperors proclaimed that both Han and non-Han peoples were part of "China". They used both "China" and "Qing" to refer to their state in official documents, international treaties, and foreign affairs. In the Chinese-language versions of its treaties and its maps of the world, the Qing government used "Qing" and "China" interchangeably. Source: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qing_dynasty#Names Yet you claim to China is Han-only China? Who are you to tell us what China is and what China isn't? And the fact remains that the 14th Dalai Lama received American CIA money to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government.
    1
  19986.  @everythingandmore5537  The Manchu conquerors of Qing Dynasty China declared China as a multi-ethnic state and rejected the idea China only meant Han areas, and they used bot "Qing" and "China" interchangeably in official documents, international treaties and foreign affairs, who are you to claim China only meant Han areas? And since Chairman Mao returned Tibet back to China, then why should China hold an election in Tibet, just because you say so? Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    1
  19987.  @manisrinivasan5871  You said "Saying those areas were part of China a few centuries back is rubbish." India has annexed Goa, Tripura, Manipur, Nagaland, Jammu & Kashmir, Sikkim into its territory, yet China's claims over Tibet and Taiwan island are rubbish? India can claim those territories for historical reasons then why can't China do the same?
    1
  19988.  @manisrinivasan5871  You said: "Whenever India reached out to China with friendship - India has been backstabbed." China invited India to join on board the Belt and Road Initiative for mutual prosperity, but India declined joining. Also in 1950s, it was Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai that proposed the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence (和平共处五项原则) to build India-China relations and settle the border dispute. But Indian PM Nehru did not want to talk, instead he pursued an aggressive "Forward Policy" of building military bases at the border with China. There were eventually 60 such outposts, including 43 beyond the internationally recognised border and on actual Chinese territory. This left China no choice but to defend our territory and our sovereignty in 1962.
    1
  19989.  @manisrinivasan5871  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. Centuries later, the Manchurians did the same with Tibet and made it part of Qing Dynasty China. Tibet briefly broke free in 1912 but was eventually reunified with China by 1951. So why is it that India can claim Goa, Tripura, Manipur, Nagaland, Jammu & Kashmir, Sikkim as part of their territory for historical reasons, but China cannot do the same?
    1
  19990. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19991.  @manisrinivasan5871  India's border with China, the McMahon Line, was drawn by the British cartographer Henry McMahon, without regard to existing historical boundaries and without consulting China. It's basically a foreigner drawing India's boundary with China. Back then Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai arrived in New Delhi to negotiate the border with Indian PM Nehru through the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence (和平共处五项原则), but Nehru stuck with the line drawn by the British, and pursued an aggressive Forward Policy of building military bases at our disputed border. 60 bases in total with 43 bases beyond the McMahon Line and in actual Chinese territory.
    1
  19992.  @manisrinivasan5871  Not just various dynasties. Various Chinese dynasties such as Yuan (元) and Qing (清) dynasty. In fact, Tibet is recognised as part of China today, since when you draw the map of the People's Republic of China, Tibet is within China's borders. Yet according to you, India has the right to claim those states for historical reasons, yet China is not allowed to do the same, then where's the fairness of your comparison? You said: "What was the need to conquer if it was Chinese to start with?" I said the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Tibet 800 years ago and made it part of China. Since then it has become a Chinese state (as well as recognised internationally as part of China today) then what more is there to speak of? How did Goa, Tripura, Manipur, Nagaland, Jammu & Kashmir, Sikkim become part of India? India can claim those territories for historical reasons, yet China cannot do the same?
    1
  19993.  @manisrinivasan5871  1. Tibet also rejoined mainland China of their own accord. On 1951, the Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet, acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there's this legally binding agreement signed by Tibetans that Tibet is part of China. You said: "Are you saying Portugese were native to India?" This was at a time when India did not exist as a unified state until it became a British colony. Goa was not part of British India neither was it a British colony. After becoming a country, India invaded Goa even though Goa was a territory with a different culture that spoke Konkani. Instead of a new independent state being formed, it was annexed by India and Marathi was imposed as the official language, including importing Marathi immigrants from neighbouring lands. You said: "2. Tibet was under occupation - as yourself mentioned - by Mongols onwards, and not part of China before 800 years." After the Mongols, Tibet remained part of China for 800 years, so why does the comparison fail? Goa was also a Portuguese colony for 400+ years, then if India can claim Goa for historical reasons, then why can't China do the same for Tibet? You said: "Indian king Ashoka had a kingdom that stretched beyond current Afghanistan and in to Burma. Does India claim those territories? South Indian kings had territoties stretched to current Java and Sumatra. Their relics and temples seen even today in Cambodia and beyond. Can India claim them today" China is not claiming Afghanistan nor Myanmar (Burma) nor far away Java nor Sumatra, China is claiming Tibet which is located right next door, so what's the point of bringing up Java and Sumatra and all those far away places?
    1
  19994.  @manisrinivasan5871  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  19995.  @manisrinivasan5871  You said: "but what bothers me is the grand vision of China at the expense of all its neighbors." What expense of all its neighbors? China has 14 neighbors (world's most number of neighbors, tied with Russia) yet China has resolved border issues with 12 of our neighbors (except for India and Bhutan) painstakingly mapping out each and every kilometer of territory with our neighbors. -In 1962, North Korea signed border treaty with China. -In 1994, Russia signed border treaty with China. -In 1964, Mongolia signed border treaty with China. -In 1994, Kazakhstan signed border treaty with China. -In 1996, Kyrgyzstan signed border treaty with China. -In 1999, Tajikistan signed border treaty with China. -In 1963, Afghanistan signed border treaty with China. -In 1963, Pakistan signed border treaty with China. -In 1960, Nepal signed border treaty with China. -In 1960, Myanmar signed border treaty with China. -In 1992, Laos signed border treaty with China. -In 1999, Vietnam signed border treaty with China. ... Only India and Bhutan have failed to sign border treaty with China. And it's not for a lack of trying, China has had 21 rounds of border talks with India and 14 rounds with Bhutan. Still failed to resolve our border dispute with these two.
    1
  19996.  @manisrinivasan5871  1. Tibet also rejoined mainland China of their own accord. On 1951, the Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet, acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there's this legally binding agreement signed by Tibetans that Tibet is part of China. You said: "Are you saying Portugese were native to India?" This was at a time when India did not exist as a unified state until it became a British colony. Goa was not part of British India neither was it a British colony. After becoming a country, India invaded Goa even though Goa was a territory with a different culture that spoke Konkani. Instead of a new independent state being formed, it was annexed by India and Marathi was imposed as the official language, including importing Marathi immigrants from neighbouring lands.
    1
  19997.  @manisrinivasan5871  You said: "2. Tibet was under occupation - as yourself mentioned - by Mongols onwards, and not part of China before 800 years." After the Mongols, Tibet remained part of China for 800 years, so why does the comparison fail? Goa was also a Portuguese colony for 400+ years, then if India can claim Goa for historical reasons, then why can't China do the same for Tibet? You said: "Indian king Ashoka had a kingdom that stretched beyond current Afghanistan and in to Burma. Does India claim those territories? South Indian kings had territoties stretched to current Java and Sumatra. Their relics and temples seen even today in Cambodia and beyond. Can India claim them today" What has India claiming beyond Afghanistan or Myanmar or Java or Sumatra even got to do with China claiming Tibet? China is not claiming some faraway territory like Java or Sumatra, China is claiming Tibet which is located right at its doorstep, then what's the point of you bringing up those faraway lands?
    1
  19998.  @manisrinivasan5871  You said: "Kingdoms/ countries have expanded and contracted over ages, and it is in our wisdom to know when to stop." Why does India continue to eye Pakistan's territory of Kashmir then? In fact, Indians often call it "Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir" when the territory has been under Pakistan's control since the 1947 partition. You said: "To claim ownership of a territory just because you had control at some point of time in the past will get us nowhere towards achieving peace." Peace has already been achieved, what are you talking about? Tibet is recognized internationally as part of the People's Republic of China. Even India recognize Tibet as part of China, so does USA, UK, EU, Canada, Australia, NZ, etc. When you draw the Map of China, Tibet is within China's territory so what's the point of you constantly bringing up Tibet? It's funny because earlier you wrote: "The world has moved on.. Annexing Tibet," yet no recognized country in the world has a problem with Tibet being part of China, it's only you who are bringing up Tibet as an issue.
    1
  19999.  @manisrinivasan5871  You said: "but what bothers me is the grand vision of China at the expense of all its neighbors." China has 14 neighbors (world's most number of neighbors, tied with Russia) yet China has resolved border issues with 12 of our neighbors (except for India and Bhutan) carefully mapping out each and every kilometer of territory with our neighbors. -In 1962, North Korea signed border treaty with China. -In 1994, Russia signed border treaty with China. -In 1964, Mongolia signed border treaty with China. -In 1994, Kazakhstan signed border treaty with China. -In 1996, Kyrgyzstan signed border treaty with China. -In 1999, Tajikistan signed border treaty with China. -In 1963, Afghanistan signed border treaty with China. -In 1963, Pakistan signed border treaty with China. -In 1960, Nepal signed border treaty with China. -In 1960, Myanmar signed border treaty with China. -In 1992, Laos signed border treaty with China. -In 1999, Vietnam signed border treaty with China. ... Only 2 countries (India and Bhutan) failed to sign border treaty with China. And it's not for a lack of trying, China has had 21 rounds of border talks with India and 14 rounds with Bhutan. Still failed to resolve our border dispute with these two.
    1
  20000. For India's next democratic election, Indian government should spend even more to elect leader just like President Trump, that will shake the very foundations of world. Even if burn through $300 million dollars, it is totally worthwhile investment, because people get freedom to choose, right? 😂😂😂 Many Chinese people extreme jealous China has no such opportunity or political freedom that democratic India enjoys. That's why India will forever be number 1 in Chinese people's eyes.
    1
  20001. Actually, India very far ahead China in terms democratic freedom of expression. Indians can express themselves anytime, anywhere they want if they feel like it, and even fight for causes they believe in. Here is list of proof of freedom in India: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_riots_in_India Chinese people can only dream of such freedoms that Indian people enjoy each day.
    1
  20002. The West desperately needs an off-ramp in Ukraine, but all they seem to have is an escalator.
    1
  20003. Meanwhile, Western magazines continue to predict China's economic hard landing 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. NYT: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak 2021 Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  20004. Meanwhile, Western journalists continue to predict an economic hard landing for China. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown 2020. NYT: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak 2021 Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  20005. Do you have evidence her family was threatened over this?
    1
  20006.  @command_unit7792  Yellow is a reference to many things Asian, apart from the Yellow River (黄河), it also refers to Asians being stereotyped as yellow skin toned (Caucasians are White, Africans are Black, Latinos/Middle-Easterners are Brown, and East Asians are Yellow). There's even this history of "fear of Asians overrunning the West" that's been called "Yellow Peril" in the West.
    1
  20007.  @stopwarstop7334  Where in my previous post did I ever mention anything about communism? China isn't communist today, in fact China is said to be more capitalist than even some Western countries!
    1
  20008.  @stopwarstop7334  What you are describing is "state capitalism" where majority of the companies are state-controlled, and it's a form of capitalism. You yourself don't even know the definition yet you want to mock me not knowing the definition? Source: State Capitalism wikipedia.org/wiki/State_capitalism And in my opinion, having the Chinese government control the Chinese corporations, for the benefit of China is much better than in America where the corporations control the government for profit, war, oil, etc.
    1
  20009. +PRCseparatedChina Taiwan I have clearly shown that China's government is state-capitalism, not communist like you are claiming, so clearly aren't you the one with your definitions all wrong? Yet you still make seemingly childish remarks instead of admitting your mistake like a real person? If China's government falls, then our Chinese companies will fall and since China is world's 2nd largest economy, the rest of the world would most likely be sent into recession (just like the 2008 US financial crash), as Chinese companies close down and Chinese investments all over the world stop, and Chinese customers no longer spend money on your economies. The whole world would be severely affected if the world's 2nd largest economy were suddenly cease. Therefore, it is in other countries best interest to continue supporting China's government, since a collapse in the Chinese government will most likely sent the rest of the world into economic recession.
    1
  20010. +PRCseparatedChina Taiwan You have shown zero proof or cited no actual sources to show that China is a communist capitalism. You are just making up your own terms yourselves, because you clearly don't even know the definitions of communism and capitalism. Whereas I've cited sources to help my definition and shown that China follows state-capitalism. You have completely failed to prove that People's Republic of China today is communist. Also you said you "don't need to admit your mistake, only communist do that." so does that mean that if China doesn't admit to its mistakes, then we are not communist? Then I am glad we are in agreement that China is not communist then! And like I said previously, its in your own country's best interest to help keep China's government afloat, since the fall of the world's 2nd largest economy will devastate the rest of the world economically and cause a global recession.
    1
  20011. +PRCseparatedChina Taiwan I've just cited the source of State-Capitalism, you clearly defined it and you've shown that 80% of the enterprise is owned either by the state government or local government. So which part of this logic is wrong? And for communist capitalism, there is no such term as communist capitalism, so you're just making up your own terms with your own definitions that's all. And since when does One-Party Rule automatically means communism you tell me? You're the one with messed up definition of terms, and making up your own terms when I've proven mine to be correct.
    1
  20012.  @marcin123G  The withdrawal of Russian forces from the Kiev region is a gesture of goodwill to create favourable conditions for Russia-Ukraine talks said Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov. ... (Source: Business Standard)
    1
  20013.  City Wok Guy  20 million Muslims in concentration camps in Xinjiang? The population of Xinjiang is around 21 million, yet you're saying 95% of people in Xinjiang are in concentration camps?
    1
  20014.  @MarkYeung1  It just shows that the Western sanctions on Russia failed to produce the desired effect of collapsing Russia's financial systems and destroying the Russian ruble. Before Russia's special military operation, the Russian Ruble was trading at round 79 to the U.S Dollar, and it took a plunge of around 60% after the operation started, and now it's at about 84 Ruble to the USD. So the Ruble has almost recovered to pre-Ukraine conflict levels. As for Ruble being "artificially" inflated, the fact that Putin made it compulsory for unfriendly countries to pay for Russian gas in Rubles, just goes to show that the Ruble is backed by gas (and also pegging it to gold) whereas the U.S Dollar is literally backed by nothing.
    1
  20015.  @MarkYeung1  But that comparison is not at the same level. Russia is not only supplying gas to the European Union, but also food in the form of wheat. If Putin decides to expand the Gas for Rubles to include Wheat for Rubles, then the ruble will be backed by Russian gas as well as Russian wheat. And these two basic commodities are staples in the West, so there's always going to be demand for Russian gas and wheat, thus stabilising the ruble. How does EU's dependence on Russia even compare China's on Australian coal? Even right now, EU countries are buying Russian gas, whereas China has weaned ourselves off Australian coal imports, so how can you say just because China can do it, that the EU can?
    1
  20016.  @MarkYeung1  European countries have basically 2 choices: 1. Continue buying cheap Russian gas in rubles, through the existing pipeline infrastructure and with sufficient supply to meet its needs. 2. Switch to buying expensive American LNG in U.S dollars, which requires infrastructure like port terminals capable of handling LNG (taking at least 5 years to build) and with insufficient LNG supply to meet its demands. ... Seems like a no-brainer to me.
    1
  20017.  @MarkYeung1  But switching from pipeline gas to LNG is very expensive. The gas pipeline (i.e Nord Stream 2) is already built, whereas to import LNG, the European countries have to construct special ports that can accommodate LNG, and it's expected to take up to 5 years to built it. And because LNG has to be shipped from far away, it's going to cost more than gas being supplied through pipeline. Another point to note is that gas pipeline has stable prices, whereas LNG price fluctuates according to market prices. You can't just simply the whole thing to "just because China can do it, that the EU can do it as well." It's the fallacy where you take just because a country can achieve something, that another country can afford to do the same.
    1
  20018.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "European governments need to be accountable to the people too." And should ordinary people in Europe have to pay higher prices for gas and for wheat? Inflation is hitting a record high in many European countries, including gas prices and food prices. The European government has to be accountable for the increased in daily expenses, even thr UK is facing its biggest drop in living standards on record as wages fail to keep up with rising prices.
    1
  20019.  @MarkYeung1  Even if the West ostracise Russian gas and oil, other countries are more than happy to pick up the demand. Just recently, the world's largest self-declared democracy, India bought 3 million barrels of Russian oil at a discount. And India even paid for it in Rupees, not Dollars too.
    1
  20020.  @MarkYeung1  You said before that you live in Canada right? Even Canadian truckers are protesting inflation and rising gas prices in Canada.
    1
  20021.  @MarkYeung1  Earlier you said: 神州 Shenzhou The answer is yes. For both Europeans, and Chinese." Now you're saying that you're not going to speak for the Europeans?
    1
  20022.  @MarkYeung1  "Ask Cyrus, he's Canadian too." That he would, I would probably agree. It's somewhat disappointing that someone like Cyrus, who is keenly aware of Western propaganda portraying China in a negative light, would fall victim to it doing the same thing towards Russia.
    1
  20023.  @MarkYeung1  What were the truckers protesting then, if not inflation and gas prices?
    1
  20024.  @MarkYeung1  China's banning of Australian coal was more than 2 years ago, whatever resentment has already long dissipated. And China has multiple sources of coal, but the European Union relies on Russian gas to fuel 40% of their energy needs. Again it's not so simple that you can simply copy-and-paste what worked for China and apply them onto the EU, while ignoring the multitude of other factors.
    1
  20025.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou India are more reliant on Russia oil than other countries." Are you certain? In 2021, India purchased just 12 million barrels of crude oil from Russia, constituting only 2 percent of its total imports, even less than its own domestic production, so how is India more reliant on Russian oil than other countries?
    1
  20026.  @MarkYeung1  But you yourself said India is more reliant on Russia oil than other countries, when the fact is that in 2021, Russia's oil imports into India made up only 2% of India's total oil imports, so how is India reliant on Russian oil? I find it strange that in other threads, you keep claiming Chinese lack access to information, yet you can't seem to get your facts straight.
    1
  20027.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou The banning of Australian coal remains while the has already long dissipated." So again, why are you bringing it up when it has long dissipated? China banned Australia coal in 2020 (which you wrongly wrote as 2021 in another comment) so why is it you can't seem to get your facts straight?
    1
  20028.  @MarkYeung1  You clearly know what I mean when I said that whatever resentment towards the banning of Australian coal has since dissipated after 2 years since its banning in 2020.
    1
  20029.  @MarkYeung1  Again, why'd you claim India is more reliant on Russian oil than other countries, when the statistics show that in 2021, India only purchased 12 million barrels of crude oil from Russia, constituting only 2 percent of its total imports, less than its own domestic production. On the other hand, imports from the Middle Eastern countries account for 52.7 percent of India’s import basket, whereas Africa and the US account for 15 percent and 14 percent of oil imports respectively. So India produces more oil domestically than they import from Russia, and they've imported more oil from the Middle East, Africa and the U.S than from Russia.
    1
  20030.  @MarkYeung1  "Absolutely. Both Huawei and Australian coal producers adapted and get better in the new world order." You mentioned New World Order, but what is your definition of this new world order? Is it one where U.S declines to the point where they are unable to challenge China's rise, so it becomes a new order where USA is no longer the frontrunner? If China's economy eventually overtakes the United State's economy someday in the foreseeable future, then how exactly will Australian coal producers get better in this new world order if the ban on Australian coal remains?
    1
  20031.  @MarkYeung1  You don't even answer my earlier questions, yet you constantly demand answers out of me incessantly?
    1
  20032. Such logical, rational views regarding China are in short supply in the West.
    1
  20033.  @Andrew-ib7gs  In the past, Hong Kong once a prosperous port city under British colonial rule, while the mainland was still poor at that time. Today however, fortunes have reversed and Hong Kong has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan and is facing increasing levels of competition from other upcoming mainland port cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian. No wonder why the people of Hong Kong feel left behind as mainland cities start surpassing them. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports Source: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage#2012%E2%80%932017
    1
  20034.  @larrythao1414  About approving the candidate, that's in accordance with Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條) which states the following: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." - Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 So Beijing reserves the right to appoint the Hong Kong Chief Executive as per HK Basic Law and Beijing did not violate the Sino-British declaration.
    1
  20035.  @larrythao1414  Majority of Hong Kong people voted for democracy yes, but nobody in Hong Kong voted for independence. Like I said many times, Hong Kong is clearly a democracy, because the people vote in elections for their government and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections so how is Hong Kong not a democracy? You just proved that Hong Kong had landslide win in the last election, so how exactly is Hong Kong not a democracy then? You proved it yourself.
    1
  20036.  @Andrew-ib7gs  Would you agree that Hong Kong actually flourished under authoritarian British colonial rule for 150 years? Then why the heck do the British feel the need to introduce democracy into Hong Kong after the 1997 handover, until today, Hong Kong is suffering under democracy? Democracy clearly doesn't work in Hong Kong, why is there a need for Hong Kong to democratise then?
    1
  20037.  @Andrew-ib7gs  Hong Kong actually thrives without democracy as a British colony, then why is there suddenly a need to switch democracy? Hong Kong is suffering today under democracy, then why British insisted on implementing democracy in Hong Kong when Hong Kong was doing well without democracy?
    1
  20038.  @Andrew-ib7gs  How's Hong Kong freedom been impacted? In Hong Kong you can practice Falun Gong (which is forbidden in the mainland) so clearly Hong Kong enjoys great autonomy, so how did China not uphold the One Country, Two Systems Policy? Hong Kong ranks among the world's freest regions according to Index of Freedom in the World In 2019, the freest countries/regions were New Zealand (8.88), Switzerland (8.82), and Hong Kong SAR, (8.81). Highest ranking in economic freedoms were Hong Kong (8.91) and Singapore (8.71). Source: Index of Freedom in the World wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Freedom_in_the_World What's wrong with 99% conviction rate? Japan has 99% conviction rate and even Canada has 97% conviction rate. A low conviction rate is worrying, because it implies that your police are arresting innocent people.
    1
  20039.  @larrythao1414  When Hong Kong was returned back to mainland China in 1997, Hong Kong represented 30% of China's economy. But today, Hong Kong represents only 3% of China's economic growth, so didn't Hong Kong actually flourish under authoritarian British colonial rule and is now suffering under democracy?
    1
  20040.  @Andrew-ib7gs  Previously, Hong Kong was under the authoritarian rule of colonial Britain, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held in Hong Kong while it was British colony. It was only during the 1997 Hong Kong handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony?
    1
  20041.  @Andrew-ib7gs  Hong Kong actually held more elections AFTER the 1997 handover back to mainland China, than they ever did for 150 years as a British colony. So how did China violate the Sino-British declaration, when Hong Kong enjoys more democracy today than they ever did as a British colony?
    1
  20042.  @Andrew-ib7gs  So since you admitted that Hong Kong actually flourished under authoritarian British colonial rule, then why do you still insist that Hong Kong switch to liberal democracy? When they were doing so well under authoritarian rule? Look at Shenzhen under communist party rule, across from Hong Kong, and Shenzhen is a technological mecca, home to the latest smartphones, gadgets, cameras, electronics, drones, IT products, Artificial Intelligence systems, automation, robotics, 5G tech, and so on. Yet Shenzhen was dirt-poor wetland village back in 1980s when Hong Kong was prosperous.
    1
  20043.  @MarkYeung1  "In Canada, the national conviction rate is about 97%. This does not include cases in which the charges are dropped, which comprise about one-third of criminal cases. Absent Quebec, the province with the lowest conviction rate, the figure is 99%" "In Japan, the criminal justice system has a conviction rate that exceeds 99%, including guilty plea cases. This has been attributed to low prosecutorial budgets impelling understaffed prosecutors to bring only the most obviously guilty defendants to trial."
    1
  20044. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了
    1
  20045.  @creddesignmatters6855  What if you're the richest person in the village, yet you still think you are poor and the villagers don't agree with you? How would your neighbours react to you being able-bodied, but refusing to work because you are lazy? You have your own perceptions, the villagers have theirs, but isn't it a better system for villagers to judge whether you have been lifted out of poverty or not? As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  20046.  @creddesignmatters6855  "神州 Shenzhou You are changing the subject" How am I changing the subject? Earlier you asked: "But who adjudicates on ‘how able’ you are, and who decides what your needs?" and I have already replied that villagers vote among themselves on who they think has been lifted out of poverty and who hasn't. Communist Party Members are selected based on "selection + election" Candidates take several exams and tests to qualify to join the Communist Party of China, where they are put on probation for 1 year after which they are acknowledged as communist party members and rise through the ranks by garnering votes from other politically experienced communist members. According to a long term study by Harvard University, around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. Source: Harvard survey finds Chinese satisfaction with govt rises china.org.cn/china/2020-07/17/content_76281590.htm A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    1
  20047.  @creddesignmatters6855  To answer your barrage of questions You asked: 1. What Power Do They Actually Have – Can They Imprison Me For Disagreeing or Not Turning Up When Summoned at the Village Level? If you disagree with the government development plan, then the government will leave you alone. For example, there are home owners living in crumbling, decrepit houses that simply refuse to summit to relocation and the government leave these "nail houses" (钉子户 because they are stubborn like nails) alone and just develop the surrounding area. Source: China's 'nail houses': The homeowners who refused to budge edition.cnn.com/2015/05/19/asia/gallery/china-nail-houses/index.html You asked: 2. Where Did They Get That Power From? From the people. According to a long term study by Harvard University has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. Source: Harvard survey finds Chinese satisfaction with govt rises china.org.cn/china/2020-07/17/content_76281590.htm A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. 3. In Whose Interests Do They Exercise It? For China's sake, that's why majority of Chinese people support the Communist Party of China. If the CPC starts serving other countries interests instead of China's, then the people will eventually rise up to overthrow the government. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. You asked: " 4. To Whom Are They Accountable?" To the people. As of now, a Harvard University study has shown that 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. Source: 5. How Can We Get Rid Of Them? Why would any country want to get rid of their government? Who is do you think is more qualified to govern the country; The People or The Government? If you said The People then why do countries still need The Government for?
    1
  20048.  @wuhaninstituteofvirology  China has not abandoned communism. China is currently following "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics" by Deng Xiaoping, in which China is in the primary stage of socialism and needed to engage in economic growth before pursuing a more egalitarian form of socialism, with the eventual goal being communism (as described in Marxist orthodoxy). China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/b8cCsUBYSkw This makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity, some 856.4 billion kilowatt hours a year – more than double the amount produced by Brazil, in second place. The top three is completed by Canada, which produces 376.7 billion kilowatt hours a year. Source: China produces the most electricity from hydroelectric power weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/
    1
  20049.  @numbersix8919  Russia transformed from arguably Europe's poorest country to Europe's strongest country after the Communist Revolution in 1917. The Soviet Union was economically superior and military superior to it's Western European neighbours, that's why NATO was formed in response to Soviet Union's rise. After the Soviet Union collapse in 1990 and Russia adopted Western democracy and capitalism, Russia is today a fraction of it's former glory as the USSR. Your data seems to support this, does that mean that Russia was better off as the Soviet Union than it is today?
    1
  20050. +NeutralDice Then why did Western society import African slaves to do the laborious work for them? If you can do it yourself, then why resort to importing slavery from another country? Today African Americans make up a significant part of US population, so the amount of slaves imported wasn't just a few. Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals were once prominent, but have since been reduced to a stranger within their own lands. As for Chinese immigrants, China is world's most populous country, so its quite possible that there isn't enough resources for everyone. With such a large student population, competition for schools and higher education in China is fierce and intense, and there aren't enough jobs for everyone once they graduate. That's why some Chinese migrate to Western countries to study and to work there. I'm sure you've seen many Chinese international exchange students in your universities, or Chinese doctors, lawyers, programmers (stereotypical I know) and researchers working in collaboration with companies. Even the low pay stereotypical jobs are Chinese chefs, waiters, laundromat, cleaners, and other hardworking jobs. Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions 四大发明. Paper and Printing have made transcribing and transmission of knowledge much more faster and easier. The Compass made navigation easier, safer voyagers and bolder exploration by sailors. And Gunpowder has revolutionized the way battles are fought today. Besides gunpowder, ancient Chinese also invented the handcannon, handgrenade, fragmentation bomb, landmine, naval mines, exploding cannonballs, rocket launchers, multi-launch rocket systems and of course fireworks. There's even an ancient Chinese flamethrower capable of launching a continuous stream of flame, just like the one deployed in WW2 and Vietnam War. What I'm saying is that Asians are in now way inferior to the West. Research has shown Asians to be among the most intelligent and diligent peoples, and people tend to stereotype Asians as hardworking, clever, good at math, good at engineering, good at computing, and so on. We Asians need to shrug off this inferior complex, imposed on us, and start treating ourselves as equals to the West and capable of achieving equally impressive feats. We should not grow to become arrogant, but we should not sell ourselves short of what we're capable of achieving.
    1
  20051. Do you believe your God sent the coronavirus as another one of His numerous plagues upon mankind?
    1
  20052. E Z 谁啊？不认识你。。。
    1
  20053.  @tennis5126  About the Social Credit System, many foreigners often complain Chinese people spit in public, smoke in non-smoking areas, jump queues, disobey traffic rules, jay walk, drive on wrong side of the road, speed through red lights, etc when not all Chinese people are like that. We Chinese feel embarrassed that such bad people represent China overseas, so the government introduce social credit system to discourage such bad behaviour and promote better behaviour instead. This is a meritocratic system where good behaviour is rewarded and bad behaviour penalised. But if such people persist with bad behaviour, until their scores fall to become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisances of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again.
    1
  20054. Russia and China are calling for cease fire, while the US continues to support Israel with weapons. Who is the true warmonger here?
    1
  20055. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20056. Addon: USA criticize China's peace plan.
    1
  20057.  @bordeaux1337  Germany and Russia would have opened the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline supplying Russian gas to Germany if not for the Biden threatening to end it. As for the ICJ, besides judges from Russia and China, another four judges also made statements or separate opinions on the ruling. Some of them explicitly said they support provisional measures based on the current situation and the suffering of the Ukrainian people but they do not agree with that in jurisprudential terms.
    1
  20058. China has world's longest range ICBM, the DF-41, with an operational range of 13,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the US LGM-30 Minuteman which has range of 13,000 km. The mountain range don't protect India, if Chinese missiles are capable of literally flying over beyond the Himalayas.
    1
  20059. Maverick 这些歪果仁和阿三真的看不起解放军。
    1
  20060. 今天是星期天，难道不能上YT评论吗？
    1
  20061. 我就放心了看到祖国这么流氓 其实 翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人太无知。你看，又有美分出现了。
    1
  20062. China has proud modern history of leaders with foresight, beginning with Dr Sun Yatsen, who overthrew the Manchu Rulers and established Republic of China, to Mao Zedong, who managed unify whole of China (which ROC failed to do) and establish People's Republic of China, to Deng Xiaoping who introduce economic reforms to China, after Mao's policies failed to take off. All of those leaders had some vision of China that they wished to create, and used whatever means necessary to achieve successes of their own. They were all true patriots of China without a doubt, and China would not be where it is today, if not for their efforts.
    1
  20063. Nobody said the path to success is going to be easy. In the past, who could have predicted whether communism or capitalism was going to be successful? We know now in the future, but back then, who could have predict the future? Hindsight is fifty-fifty remember? Modern China was built by the sweat, blood, tears and sacrifice of Chinese people, through various wars, invasions, famines, rebellions and revolutions. There were many mistakes, failures and trial-and-errors, but China eventually emerged from a poor, starving, war-torn country, into an economic juggernaut, with strong military and potential rival to USA. Not many "other countries" could claim to have achieved what China did in only 30 years.
    1
  20064. 战忽局同志辛苦了
    1
  20065. @Patrick Henry President Trump failed to win negotiations with democrats regarding the Wall on the border with Mexico, so how does Trump expect to win a deal with China?
    1
  20066. Duterte doesn't yield to the Americans, it's Marcos that does that.
    1
  20067.  @NancyDugdale  Philippines became an American colony after the American-Philippine War. Philippine's maritime boundaries were drawn in the 1989 Treaty of Paris which DOES NOT include the South China Sea Islands. (Source: Wikipedia: File: Ph boundary in Treaty of Paris 1898)
    1
  20068. I don't understand why some people think Chinese are incapable of cooking our own Chinese food. In virtually every major city in the world, there are always Chinese ethnic enclaves, which serve as tourist attractions and where local people can go to appreciate Chinese cuisine cooked by Chinese people, and these enclaves are more commonly known as "Chinatowns."
    1
  20069. The Japanese characters (Kanji) actually come from Chinese Characters (Hanzi) But during WW2, Japanese soldiers invaded Korea, China, and even Philippines, committing mass atrocities like Rape of Nanjing, Unit 731 and using local women as "comfort" women.
    1
  20070. Gas Axe There are also positive examples of dictatorship, such as Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew who turned the small village state into a global metropolis today, together with his party the PAP.
    1
  20071. The Joker There is also South Korean dictator, called Park Chung-hee, who helped to modernize South Korea and develop its economy. When he came to power in 1961, South Korea's per capita income was only US$72.00 and North Korea was the greater economic and military power on the peninsula. His goal was to end the poverty of South Korea, and lift the country up from being a 3rd World economy to a 1st World economy.
    1
  20072.  Supreme  What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Before 2019, Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  20073.  Supreme  What's wrong with using YouTube while in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so, you tell me?
    1
  20074. China doesn't want to expand, only to recover its historical territory it had lost through the Opium Wars, Boxer Rebellion and Sino-Japanese War. Remember that French political cartoon of the Eight Nations carving up China like a pie among themselves? Taiwan island is the last unclaimed piece that the mainland seeks to recover.
    1
  20075. @反共抗俄 但问题是评论里很多人看不懂中文，所以用英语比较有效。
    1
  20076.  @stopwarstop7334  Mainland fighter jets flew in international airspace so what's wrong with it? In fact, if you track the flight path, the People's Liberation Army Airforce fighters flew closer to mainland China than Taiwan island. As for Afghanistan, China is seeking to boost ties with Afghanistan, just recently China send 500 tonnes of humanitarian aid to Afghanistan to help their people, whereas the United States just freeze billions of dollars in Afghan assets.
    1
  20077.  @stopwarstop7334  Go and trace the flight path by the PLAAF fighters and it's entirely in international airspace inside the Taiwan Strait. In fact, Taiwan's Air Defense Identification Zone isn't even recognized by any country in the world and PLAAF fighter jets most certainly did not fly over any Taiwan airspace. And what US and Japan aircraft flew in the Taiwan Strait are you talking about? And China did send 500 tonnes of humanitarian aid to Afghanistan, why are you claiming China didn't send anything to Afghanistan?
    1
  20078. @反共抗俄 So if you don't want to speak English or French, then don't. I've already explained that even if I use Chinese language, it doesn't mean that everyone in the comments will understand what I'm saying, that's why I use English here, because it's just more effective here. Just like using Chinese language is more effective on Chinese social media like Weibo, Youku, WeChat, etc.
    1
  20079.  @stopwarstop7334  Because both the Republic of China 🇹🇼 and the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 both agree that there is One China and that Taiwan is part of China, that's part of the 1992 Consensus. Also, if you look at Taiwan's constitution, ROC claims all of mainland China as part of their territory, then why can't the PRC claim Taiwan as part of our territory? Since Taiwan island can claim the mainland, then why can't mainland China claim Taiwan? Also, since the 1972 Shanghai Communique, the United States also recognize the One China Policy and that Taiwan is part of China and does not challenge that position. Here's an article from The Diplomat entitled: The Shanghai Communique: An American Foreign Policy Success, 45 Years Later On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia...The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position. ... Source: The Diplomat: The Shanghai Communique: An American Foreign Policy Success, 45 Years Later
    1
  20080. @反共抗俄 But I'm not buying anything from you, instead I'm selling my points to my opponent, then why should I use Chinese language here instead of English?
    1
  20081. @反共抗俄 I mean, if you're so upset that you learn French and English for nothing, then don't speak those languages then. But does that give you the right to tell others not to speak their language when communicating?
    1
  20082.  @stopwarstop7334  If you claim PRC constitution is fake, then why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Winning the civil war should have been a piece of cake, yet despite all these advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communists peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists' right to rule China.
    1
  20083.  @stopwarstop7334  "神州 Shenzhou US did not challenge because they never disagree that Taiwan is part of Republic of China." USA also never disagree that Taiwan is part of the People's Republic of China, even till today the USA accepts the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China. U.S President Biden acknowledged it, former President Trump acknowledged it (after a phonecall with President Xi) and so did Obama administration much earlier. And as I said earlier the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan, then why should PRC change our constitution to ROC constitution? You're just going against the force of history here. So according to you, ROC Taiwan is not even a member of the UN, but PRC China is. And mainland China claims Taiwan as part of China (so does ROC) then how is it not clear to you that Taiwan is part of China? All your arguments lead to the same conclusion that Taiwan is part of China, whether by ROC constitution or PRC constitution. Even the USA does not challenge the position that Taiwan is part of China since the 1972 Shanghai Communique.
    1
  20084.  @stopwarstop7334  "神州 Shenzhou i don't know.... " So you don't know why ROC 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to PRC 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? Then why should PRC change our constitution to ROC constitution, when the ROC lose the mainland? It's like you're asking Dr. Sun Zhongshan to change his constitution to Qing constitution even after he ended the Qing dynasty. And since you've acknowledged that Dr. Sun overthrew the Qing Dynasty, then why is it you won't acknowledge the fact that the communists overthrew the KMT from the mainland?
    1
  20085.  @stopwarstop7334  Earlier you complained about PRC's 🇨🇳 9 Dash Line claiming the South China Sea, but this map was inherited from ROC's 🇹🇼 11 Dash Line that they published in 1947, and PRC just removed two dashes from it. Even till today, ROC Taiwan maintains the 11 Dash Line claim to the South China Sea, so why are you complaining about PRC's 9 Dash Line but not ROC Taiwan's 11 Dash Line?
    1
  20086.  @stopwarstop7334  Read the 1972 Shanghai Communique and the USA recognize Taiwan is part of China and does not challenge that position. Here's excerpts from an article from The Diplomat On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia...The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position. ... Source: The Diplomat: The Shanghai Communique: An American Foreign Policy Success, 45 Years Later (28 Feb 2017) You asked: "They agree that Taiwan is part of China could be Republic of China. Why do you think it has to be People's Republic of China." Why not? They agree that Taiwan is part of China could be the People's Republic of China as well. Also you complain about all this ambiguity, then why not just get Taiwan to fully reunify itself with mainland China? Why should the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 change our constitution to the Republic of China 🇹🇼 when the ROC lost the mainland to the PRC? Also, the PRC constitution is not the same as ROC constitution. ROC actually claims more territory than PRC, such as territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Futhermore, ROC claims the 11 Dash Line over the South China Sea, whereas PRC claims the 9 Dash Line.
    1
  20087.  @stopwarstop7334  Show me where did US or any country in UN DIDN'T agree that Taiwan is part of People's Republic of China. As we both know the People's Republic of China is a UN member (since 1971), and the PRC constitution clearly states that Taiwan is part of China, and countries like USA agree that there is only One China and Taiwan is part of China since the 1972 Shanghai Communique. I mean, most major countries in the world (i.e USA, UK, Australia, Canada, France, Germany, India, Japan, Korea, etc) don't have any formal Taiwan embassies in them. Even just recently among the smaller countries, the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua both switched recognition of Taipei to Beijing. And again, the PRC constitution is clearly different from ROC constitution, because ROC claims additional territory that's currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Futhermore, ROC claims the 11 Dash Line over the South China Sea, whereas PRC claims the 9 Dash Line. I've provided numerous treaties, articles and dates to show that Taiwan is part of China, both PRC and ROC agree on this and even the United States doesn't not challenge the position that Taiwan is part of China. Yet you just claim that I lost when you repeatedly fail to refute my points?
    1
  20088.  @stopwarstop7334  It's no secret today that the United States is in decline, and China is rising. Many economists predict that China's economy is expected to surpass the United States someday in the foreseeable future. The U.S has a closing window of opportunity in which to spark a hot conflict, in an attempt to stop China's rise. But as long as peace prevails, China will eventually cross this dangerous threshold (perhaps by 2025-2028) by which the U.S would have declined to the point that they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise. By this time, the Taiwan would probably realize that they can no longer rely on the only thing backing up their independence movement (i.e the promise of U.S military support) since the U.S has declined to the point where it's no longer worth it for them to start any conflict with mainland China over Taiwan. Taiwan would then be eventually reunified with the mainland once it's U.S support is gone.
    1
  20089.  @stopwarstop7334  "That is China's internal problem. One country means one country. United Nations admit by country not their little parts." So you agree that Taiwan is China's internal problem right? That means that Taiwan is part of China, both PRC and ROC agree on the One China policy that there is only one China and Taiwan is part of China. And you just admitted that Taiwan is not a country in the UN, since Taiwan cannot join the UN isn't it? I've previously cited the 1972 Shanghai Communique stating that the United States recognise the One China policy and that Taiwan is part of China, and they do not seek to challenge this position. I've already refuted your point countless times, but you still claim that I've lost? And Taiwan passport literally says that Taiwan is part of China too. China is special in that we have multiple passports despite being a single country. We have Hong Kong passport, Macau passport, Taiwan passport and mainland China passport, yet they are all part of China. But the fact remains that Taiwan has no embassies in major countries, meaning that they do not recognise Taiwan as its own country, it's still part of China. Even among the small countries, the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua switched recognition of Taipei to Beijing.
    1
  20090.  @stopwarstop7334  Taiwan buy jets from the USA, but it's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. Soon, the US would have declined to the point where US would be unable to challenge mainland China's rise, and that means Taiwan would have lost its military backing. So all the mainland needs to do is wait patiently until the USA declines to the point when they can no longer afford to support Taiwan and Taiwan will eventually be reunified with the mainland.
    1
  20091.  @stopwarstop7334  You said: "He got special permission to upload China loving videos while the Chinese people in China can't even upload anything about their dialy life in lockdown on YouTube." Who says so? I search YouTube for "Life in Xi'an under lockdown" and there's many videos of life under lockdown in China by ordinary people. Video: Life of a foreign student under lockdown in Xi'an Video: Xi'an resident navigates life and testing under lockdown Video: Xi'an resident: My lockdown diary
    1
  20092.  @stopwarstop7334  So if UN thinks it's People's Republic of China's 🇨🇳 internal problem and that Republic of China 🇹🇼 Taiwan is not a member of the UN, that also implies other UN countries recognize Taiwan is not a country. And I have previously explained that under the 1972 Shanghai Communique, the USA recognize Taiwan as part of China and does not challenge this position. You can't refute my points so instead you resort to fallacies like ad hominem_attacks against me such as mocking my English proficiency instead of refuting my points? Both ROC and PRC recognize the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China, and even the United States does so under the 1972 _Shanghai Communique, yet you can't refute my point so you resort to attacking me personally instead of addressing my argument. And I've shown many times that ROC and PRC have different constitution, like in the South China Sea for example, ROC Taiwan claims the 11 Dash Line compared to PRC's 9 Dash Line. yet you still want to complain about the 9 Dash Line?
    1
  20093.  @stopwarstop7334  1) Because Taiwan since is not a UN member, that means that UN countries don't recognize Taiwan as a country. Just recently, the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua switched their recognition From Taipei to Beijing. Go read the news. 2) So ROC constitution can claim all of mainland China, then why can't mainland China claim Taiwan? ROC constitution claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as well as territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan then why can't PRC claim Taiwan? 3) Go and read Taiwan's constitution, the ROC claim the South China Sea Islands under the 11 Dash Line, whereas PRC claims the 9 Dash Line. Even till today, Taiwan maintains the claims over the 11 Dash Line, who says they aren't doing it now?
    1
  20094.  @stopwarstop7334  1) Why should I go and check? Are you lazy to do it yourself? Since I've already shown that Taiwan is not a member of the UN, that both ROC and PRC agree to the One China Policy that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, and that the United States does not challenge this position since the 1972 Shanghai Communique, I've literally proven my case several times over. Yet you still claim that I have lost when you failed to refute my points? 2) So since ROC can claim all of mainland China as part of their territory, then can't PRC claim Taiwan as part of our territory? Both ROC and PRC agree that Taiwan is part of China under the One China Policy, and it was ROC that lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants during the Chinese Civil War, and they had to flee to Taiwan. 3) PRC is the inheritor of China after the ROC, why can't PRC China claim the South China Sea under the 9 Dash Line (which is smaller than ROC's 11 Dash Line by two dashes)? PRC is not claiming on ROC's behalf, we are claiming on China's behalf. Even ROC Taiwan has rejected to the arbitration tribunal ruling on the South China Sea. Ma Ying-jeou had rejected the Philippines' claim as "patently false", that means Taiwan still adhere to the 11 Dash Line claims.
    1
  20095.  @stopwarstop7334  1) When did I asked what? All I stated was that since Taiwan is not a UN member, that means UN countries don't recognize Taiwan as a country that's all. Just recently the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua switched recognition of Taipei to Beijing, and like I said earlier that Taiwan doesn't have any embassies in the major countries (i.e USA, UK, Canada, Australia, EU countries, India, Japan, Korea, etc) meaning that those countries don't recognize Taiwan as a country. 2) So now you agreed that since ROC Taiwan can claim the mainland, that the mainland can claim Taiwan? Also I previously mentioned that the country backing Taiwan against the mainland is the United States military, but it's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. China doesn't need to go to war to reunify Taiwan with the mainland, all it needs to do is wait until the USA declines to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China, by which then Taiwan would no longer have U.S military support and would eventually be reintegrated with the mainland. 3) China is not a property for ROC 🇹🇼 to give to PRC 🇨🇳 as and when it please. It's historical fact that the ROC lose the mainland to the PRC and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Defeating the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT, yet despite all these advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while at the same time cementing the Communists right to rule China. Ma Ying Jeou represented the people of Taiwan when he said that he rejected the Philippines' claim. And since the Tsai Ing-wen did not say anything about the arbitration tribunal ruling, that means that Taiwan stance remains unchanged, that they reject Philippines' claim as "patently false".
    1
  20096.  @stopwarstop7334  Because it's apparent that you can't refute my points. Both ROC and PRC agree that there is One China and that Taiwan is part of China. Even the United States does not challenge this position since the 1972 Shanghai Communique. 1) Earlier you said: "神州 Shenzhou 1) you forgot that you were the one that asked so go do your research." but what did I asked what? I read my previous points and I wrote because Taiwan since is not a UN member, that means that UN countries don't recognize Taiwan as a country, since when did I ask what? A rep office is not an official embassy and Taiwan doesn't have any embassies in most major UN countries. We can go over a list if your like: -Australia is a UN member yet it does not recognize Taiwan (no Taiwan embassies). -Britain is a UN member yet it does not recognize Taiwan (no Taiwan embassies). -Canada is a UN member yet it does not recognize Taiwan (no Taiwan embassies). -United States is a UN member yet it does not recognize Taiwan (no Taiwan embassies). -Germany is a UN member yet it does not recognize Taiwan (no Taiwan embassies). -France is a UN member yet it does not recognize Taiwan (no Taiwan embassies). -Russia is a UN member yet it does not recognize Taiwan (no Taiwan embassies). -India is a UN member yet it does not recognize Taiwan (no Taiwan embassies). -Japan is a UN member yet it does not recognize Taiwan (no Taiwan embassies). ... (repeat for all UN countries) ... Therefore, we can say that UN countries do not recognize Taiwan, then I've already proven this point over and over again. 2) So since you claim ROC is not dead yet, that means you've admit Taiwan is not a country, since ROC claims it's China. That means under ROC constitution, Taiwan claims it's China and therefore, it's not some country called Taiwan. And China is not some property for ROC 🇹🇼 to give to PRC 🇨🇳 as and when it please, it's a historical fact that the ROC lose the mainland to the PRC and had to flee to Taiwan. 3) China is clearly rising, we have transformed from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made-In-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-China propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. And the U.S is in decline. All China needs to do is wait patiently until the U.S declines to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China anymore, by which Taiwan would have lost U.S backing, and would eventually have to reunify with the mainland.
    1
  20097.  @stopwarstop7334  How am I narrow minded when I've consistently cited numerous examples that reinforce the fact that Taiwan is part of China and not a country in itself? 1) Earlier you said: _"神州 Shenzhou 1) you forgot that you were the one that asked so go do your research." but what did I asked what? I've already shown that UN countries don't recognize Taiwan as a country (no Taiwan embassies in Australia, Britain, Canada, United States, Germany, France, Russia, India, Japan, etc) that means that they don't recognize Taiwan as a country. So I've reinforced my point, but you just dismiss everything without citing evidence of your own. 2) But a representative office is not an official embassy so those UN countries do not recognize Taiwan as a country. If not then why can't Taiwan build actual official embassies in other UN countries since you claim Taiwan is a country? 3) So you claim Taiwan is not dead and it's a country since 1912, that means you're accepting the fact that ROC claims it's China. So what you're saying is that there is no country called Taiwan, but there is a country called China and that both ROC and PRC agree on this One China policy. Then you've just proven that Taiwan is not a country, it is China that is a country, since even ROC constitution says that. 4) I've already shown that China is rising and US is in decline. Time is on China's side. As long as peace prevails and China doesn't get sucked into an unnecessary conflict over Taiwan, the U.S will eventually decline to the point where they are no longer able to challenge China, and that's when Taiwan's backing is gone and it will eventually reunify with the mainland.
    1
  20098.  @stopwarstop7334  What mistake? You failed to counter the fact that both ROC and PRC agree on the One China Policy and that Taiwan is part of China, that the United States does not challenge that position since the 1972 Shanghai Communique. 1) Let's go back to the beginning of this point. You said: "1) The word "acknowleged" in the dictionary doesn't mean agree. So why you say all country in UN agrees Taiwan is part of China." ... I responded with: "1) Because Taiwan since is not a UN member, that means that UN countries don't recognize Taiwan as a country. Just recently, the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua switched their recognition From Taipei to Beijing. Go read the news." ... Now you're changing the point to "1) Many countries is a country but not in United Nation." but this wasn't the original point, the original point was "So why you say all country in UN agrees Taiwan is part of China" as you wrote. So you're applying the strawman fallacy which has the impression of refuting an argument, but the real subject of the argument was not addressed or refuted, but instead replaced with a false one. ... When in fact, I've already long refuted the point that UN countries don't recognize Taiwan as a country. 2) As I have said, a representative office is not an official embassy so those UN countries do not recognize Taiwan as a country. The VISA policy of Taiwan is that those are Republic of China VISA, and since ROC claims it's China, that means Taiwan is not a country, but China is a country according to ROC, that's why visitors to Taiwan can have ROC VISA. Since you claim ROC is still alive in Taiwan, that means you've accepted the fact that there is no country called Taiwan, but there is a country called China according to ROC. So you've proven Taiwan is not a country, merely a part of China (as recognized by both ROC and PRC) then you're argument that Taiwan is a country is wrong (unless that country is China) And why'd the ROC lose the mainland to the PRC and had to flee to Taiwan, despite the KMT being well-armed, well-funded and outnumbering the communists? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists' right to rule China. 3) How is China acting like a barbarian just by patiently waiting for U.S to decline to the point where they can no longer challenge China's rise? Instead of starting a hot conflict over Taiwan, all the mainland needs to do is wait for U.S to decline and eventually, Taiwan's backing will be gone and it will eventually reunify with the mainland. Time is on China's side, and as long as peace prevails without China getting sucked into a pointless conflict over Taiwan, the U.S decline would prove to China's advantage in the end when it comes to Taiwan island.
    1
  20099.  @stopwarstop7334  "神州 Shenzhou and you failed to say which China it is." That means you yourself acknowledge that both ROC and PRC both claim to be China, then how can Taiwan be a country when ROC claims it's China? If anything, you've repeatedly shown that the country called Taiwan doesn't exist, but the country called China exists under ROC's constitution. So Taiwan is not a country, unless that country is China. So now you've abandoned the 1), 2), 3) format, after I've exposed your strawman fallacy when you said all country in UN agrees Taiwan is part of China. I've long refuted the point that UN countries don't recognize Taiwan as a country, but you suddenly changed the argument to one about countries outside of the UN, it just goes to show how fallacious your thinking really is. You said: "ROC give PRC United Nation seat and UN had successful fooled PRC." ROC did not give PRC the seat in the United Nations. It was UN countries that democratically voted to recognize PRC as China and to kick ROC Taiwan out of the UN in 1971. The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the UN General Assembly Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The voting results were as follows: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting ... Source: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 Since PRC won the majority vote with two thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, and recognized the PRC as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" from the UN. So it was the UN countries that democratically voted to recognize PRC and to kick ROC Taiwan out of the UN.
    1
  20100.  @stopwarstop7334  You don't have to argue because you're clearly unable to refute my points. Both ROC and PRC recognise that there is only One China and that Taiwan is part of China, this already shoot your claim that Taiwan is a country out the window, since ROC Taiwan claims that its China. So there is no country called Taiwan, but there is a country called China according to ROC. This is the first time I hear about someone being so happy about PRC being a UN member and ROC Taiwan not being one. Taiwan loses a lot of recognition and privileges just by being locked out of organisations like the UN and the WHO, yet you're happy that Taiwan is not a UN member? Taiwan don't even have any official embassies in major countries, heck, Taiwan cannot even participate in the Olympics under their own name, they have to participate as "Chinese Taipei." Yet you act as though Taiwan trade, relationship and defense are improving? Even the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua recently switched recognition of Taipei to Beijing. Taiwan's defense relies on the United States military equipment, and Taiwan people have to fork out money to buy US weapons. Whatever price the USA names, Taiwan have to pay. And the USA dares not sell the high-end, cutting edge U.S miltary technology to Taiwan, in case of the scenario where Taiwan is defeated or reunify with the mainland and the US equipment falls into the mainland's hands. So what's there to celebrate about Taiwan losing prominence and not being a UN member? The reality is that Taiwan is a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    1
  20101.  @stopwarstop7334  My point has been stated all this time, it's that both ROC and PRC agree that there is One China and that Taiwan is part of China. This already throws your claim that Taiwan is a country out the window, because ROC constitution claims to be China, so there is no country called Taiwan, but there is a country called China. So Taiwan is not a country (unless said country is China). And again, this is the first time I've seen someone so ecstatic that Taiwan is not a member of the UN, when being locked out of UN denies Taiwan many benefits and privileges, that's why Taiwan has been trying to get into UN to access those benefits. In fact, the Republic of China's most recent request for admission was turned down in 2007, yet here you are celebrating the fact that Taiwan is not a UN member. If mainland China can block Taiwan from entering the UN, that means you're admitting that the mainland is controlling Taiwan and preventing them from joining UN? That means Taiwan isn't an independent nation after all, since it's being controlled. Look, Taiwan can't even participate in the Olympics under their own name, they have to use the name "Chinese Taipei", so isn't this already enough proof that Taiwan isn't an independent nation and is being controlled? About Taiwan technology, take smartphones for example and mainland China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Top Smartphone brands in 2021 1. Samsung (South Korean) 2. Huawei (Chinese) 3. Apple (American) 4. Oppo (Chinese) 5. Vivo (Chinese) 6. Xiaomi (Chinese) 7. LG (South Korean) 8. Lenovo (Chinese) 9. ZTE (Chinese) 10. Alcatel-Lucent (formerly French, now Chinese) ... But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  20102.  @stopwarstop7334  But earlier when you used the 1), 2), 3) format of response, you never mentioned anything about outside of the UN, you said (and I quote your earlier words) "1) The word "acknowleged" in the dictionary doesn't mean agree. So why you say all country in UN agrees Taiwan is part of China." and I have long refuted your point because "Taiwan is not a UN member, that means that UN countries don't recognize Taiwan as a country." So this new point about "outside UN" is a straw-man fallacy that you've replaced the original point with. Furthermore, I've long established that there is no country called Taiwan, but there exists a country called China under ROC's constitution (even you acknowledged that ROC is not dead several times) so how can you claim that Taiwan is a country (unless said country is China)? I'm not confused, I've stated my point several times and cited numerous articles to substantiate my position. Even the United States recognize the One China Policy and that Taiwan is part of China since the 1972 Shanghai Communique, go and read The Diplomat: The Shanghai Communique: An American Foreign Policy Success, 45 Years Later Excerpt: On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia...The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position. ... About technology in China, China is home to many largest Internet companies like Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Suning, ByteDance (Tik Tok), Baidu, NetEase, Kwai, Pinduoduo, Trip dotcom, Sina Corp, and so on. Source: Wikipedia: List of largest Internet companies But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  20103.  @stopwarstop7334  In your 1) 2) 3) format you never mentioned anything about outside of the UN, you were asking why all country in UN agrees Taiwan is part of China, and I have answered it that Taiwan is not a UN member, that means that UN countries don't recognize Taiwan as a country. This "outside UN" point is a strawman fallacy that you've created to replace your original point. And you talk about being the "only China in the universe" but even the ROC agrees that there is only One China, so shouldn't you complaining about ROC as well thinking that they are the only China in the universe? And 1.4 billion people of PRC represent around 20% of the world's population compared to just 23 million people of ROC, so why should a fifth of humanity go live on the Moon just because ROC want's to be the "only China in the universe"? Can't you see the sheer hubris of your own statement, that 1.4 billion have to give up to 23 million? Speaking of going to the Moon, did you know China's lunar lander Chang'e-3 (嫦娥三号) and China's lunar rover Yutu (玉兔; lit. 'Jade Rabbit') soft-landed on the Moon in 2013, making China the 3rd country in the world to independently achieve soft lunar landing on the Moon's surface? Yet you speak about Taiwan technology then why can't you name any Taiwan companies or achievements?
    1
  20104.  @stopwarstop7334  You accuse me of going in circles, yet here you are unable to refute anything I've said. The Republic of China also considers itself "the only China in the universe" so everything you said about being the only China in the universe can also apply to ROC. And 1.4 billion people represents 20% of humanity, why should a fifth of humanity give up and go to the Moon because of 23 million? The sheer arrogance of you to think 1.4 billion have to give up because of 23 million. And isn't the Moon part of our universe in the first place? If China could go to the Moon (which we already have already landed on) then China will still be the only China in the universe. And speaking of landing on the Moon, China became the first country to land on the far side of the Moon on 3 January 2019, with lunar lander Chang'e-4 (嫦娥四号) and lunar rover Yutu-2 (玉兔二号 Jade Rabbit-2) exploring the far side of the Moon. A communication relay satellite, Queqiao (鹊桥 'Magpie Bridge') was launched to facilitate communications between Earth and the far side of the Moon, even the U.S hasn't achieved landing on the far side of the Moon.
    1
  20105.  @stopwarstop7334  The sheer audacity of the Republic of China, to claim to be the "only China in the universe" that's what you should really be ashamed of. To claim to be the keeper of 5,000 years of Chinese history and culture, what gives the ROC the right to be the only China and for 1.4 billion people (representing a fifth of humanity) in PRC, to give up to 21 million in ROC, that's the level of hubris you are exhibiting. I mean, where's the location of the Great Wall of China? Certainly not in ROC Taiwan, then how on Earth can you expect ROC to be the "only China in the universe"? Where's the Forbidden City? The Terracotta Warriors? The Grand Canal (world's oldest and longest artificial river)? Certainly not in Taiwan, then why should the award of "being the only China in the universe" even go to ROC Taiwan then? You earlier boasted about Taiwan technology, yet you can't even compare Taiwan to mainland China's advances in space exploration. Mainland China has landed on the Moon, why hasn't Taiwan done so independently? You claim PRC is so dependent on ROC, well, Taiwan is the mainland's 6th largest trading partner, whereas the mainland is Taiwan's biggest trading partner. ROC is going to be hurt more by the loss of trade with PRC than PRC is going be with ROC.
    1
  20106.  @stopwarstop7334  You yourself claimed Republic of China was founded in 1912, then how is it able to have 5,000 years of history? I mean where's the Great Wall of China located? Certainly not in Taiwan. Where's the Forbidden City? The Terracotta Warriors? The Grand Canal (world's oldest and longest artificial river)? Certainly not in Taiwan, then how can the ROC boast to be the "only China in the universe"? The sheer arrogance of Taiwan claiming to be China is what you should really be ashamed of. Earlier you boasted that Taiwan is too good for technology, yet you failed to name any examples of Taiwan surpassing mainland China in lunar landing and space exploration. China has even launched space stations into orbit just look at the Tiangong (天宫 "Heavenly Palace") Space Station. The first module, the Tianhe (天和 "Harmony of the Heavens") core module, was launched on 29 April 2021, followed by multiple crewed and uncrewed missions and two more modules to be launched by 2022. Even in the Spring Festival Gala, the taikonauts (Chinese astronauts) celebrated the new year with traditional Chinese calligraphy. This shows how China is both an ancient civilization as well as a modern space-faring nation. Let's get this straight, you don't really care about Chinese mainlanders. You have repeatedly called for all 1.4 billion people of China to move to the Moon, just because you refuse to acknowledge that the KMT lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. Then why should 1.4 billion people give in to the 21 million people of Taiwan? The sheer hubris of you to deny a fifth of humanity our birthright and claim ROC is the "only China in the universe" just shows the level of arrogance you have towards mainlanders, so why pretend that you don't hate mainlanders? When every word you said shows clearly your disgust for mainlanders? And if you look at 5,000 years of Chinese history, China was never democratic, it was ruled by Emperors and the Imperial Court, much like how the PRC is ruled by the President and the Communist Party of China. The current PRC political system closely emulates China's ancient political system as compared to ROC's Western-style democracy.
    1
  20107.  @stopwarstop7334  5,000 years of history is China's history. And its PRC that's in control over the mainland, so those 5,000 years of history is China's history, since the ROC isn't in control over the mainland. Like I said, the Great Wall of China, the Forbidden City, the Terracotta Army are all located in mainland China, then why do you tolerate the ROC claiming that they are "the only China in the universe" and denying 1.4 billion people our birthright? The sheer audacity of you to suggest that 1.4 billion people in the mainland give in to 21 million in Taiwan, can't you see the hubris in your statement? It's historical fact that the KMT lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan, then why should 1.4 billion people go to the Moon just because you say so? Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    1
  20108.  @stopwarstop7334  Let's get this straight. PRC China always welcome Taiwan as part of China, we stated many times that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, and we look forward to Taiwan's eventual reunification with the mainland. Many Chinese mainlanders regard the people in Taiwan as our brothers and this stance by PRC is well-known. But it's people like you who want 1.4 billion people to "get off" the planet, because you can't tolerate PRC being China. So why'd you pretend earlier that you don't hate mainlanders when you've repeatedly called for 1.4 billion people to give in to 21 million people in Taiwan? You're the one that refuse to accept the reality that the ROC lost the mainland to PRC and had to flee to Taiwan. If you claim "A country can grow big or shrink" then that means you support PRC expanding and incorporating Taiwan island through reunification? Because the reverse scenario is like a snake trying to devour an elephant (蛇吞象) if you think Taiwan can retake the mainland.
    1
  20109.  @stopwarstop7334  The reason why ROC Taiwan thinks they can hold out against PRC is because of U.S military backing. But it's no secret today that the United States is in decline and China is rising. As long as peace prevails, the U.S will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise, which means Taiwan's military backing is gone and reunification will eventually happen. As PRC stated many times, China regards the people of Taiwan as our brothers. As the Chinese government stated many times, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, and we are not telling the 21 million people in Taiwan to go live on the Moon, it's people like you who arrogantly tell 1.4 billion people to go live on the Moon, because you can't accept the fact that ROC lost the mainland to PRC and had to flee to Taiwan. Yet you still pretend that you don't hate mainlanders when you insult us as "square heads"? And why do you want the Communist Party of China to fall? The CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, possibly wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China?
    1
  20110.  @stopwarstop7334  Taiwan clearly depends on the United States for military backing. Taiwanese taxpayers literally pay taxes so that Taiwan can purchase U.S military equipment, and U.S arms manufacturers often sell the low quality weapons to Taiwan, in case Taiwan reunifies with the mainland and the Taiwan weapons get added to the People's Liberation Army arsenal. And you can't halt the U.S decline or China's rise, eventually there will come a point in time where U.S declines until it's no longer able to challenge China's rise, and that's where Taiwan's backing will be gone. And I don't know how many times I need to stress this. PRC is not the separator, China have publicly stated countless times that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, how many times have you heard that phrase from the Chinese government? Mainland Chinese see the people of Taiwan as our brothers, and we're not going to tell the 21 million population of Taiwan to go live on the Moon, they are Chinese as much as Taiwan is part of China. However, it's the arrogant people like you who claim 1.4 billion people should just go live on the Moon, just because you refuse to accept the fact that ROC lost the mainland to PRC and had to flee to Taiwan. The people of Taiwan need to realise that the United States doesn't care about Taiwan, as long as they can use Taiwan as a chess piece to contain China's rise.
    1
  20111.  @stopwarstop7334  Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, how is it none of PRC's business? Once the United States declines to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise, then Taiwan's support will be gone and they will eventually have to accept reunification with the mainland. And how is PRC the separator when our stance has always been that Taiwan is part of China? You're the one who told 1.4 billion people to go live on the Moon, yet you pretend that you don't hate mainlanders? Also, what makes you think China will fall? Western journalists have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western journalists predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for 30 years already?
    1
  20112.  @stopwarstop7334  The point is that both ROC and PRC agree that Taiwan is part of China (like I mentioned earlier), so again, how is PRC a separator, when PRC considers Taiwan an inalienable part of China? It's you who simply refuse to accept the fact the that ROC lost the mainland to the PRC, and you arrogantly want 1.4 billion people to go live on the Moon, yet you pretend that you don't hate mainlanders? When you've been insulting mainlanders as "square heads" several times? And not talking about USA doesn't change the fact that U.S is in decline and China is rising. Taiwan army alone can't even afford to go toe to toe with the People's Liberation Army, so even if you take the U.S army out of the picture, Taiwan doesn't stand a chance. Once Taiwan no longer has the U.S backing, Taiwan will eventually reunify with the mainland, especially once US is out of the pictures. And why do you keep thinking the Communist Party of China will fall? A Harvard University and Ash Center study has revealed that the CPC enjoys 80%-90% support from Chinese citizens polled. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    1
  20113. ​ @stopwarstop7334  Since you claim Taiwan is an inalienable part of Republic of China, then why can't the People's Republic of China claim that Taiwan is an inalienable part of the People's Republic of China? You're the one who trying to separate Taiwan from China, you even told 1.4 billion people to go live on the Moon, rather than accept the reality that the ROC lost the mainland to the PRC. And you keep saying CPC will fall for separating China, but PRC's stance is always that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, so your whole logic is overturned. You just can't accept the fact that the Communist Party transformed China from a once dirt-poor, war-torn starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy today, the world's factory (Made in China), having world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the PLA, funded by the world's 2nd largest military expenditure. Wherea's Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    1
  20114.  @stopwarstop7334  Why can't the People's Republic of China claim Taiwan? The Republic of China can claim all of mainland China, then why can't PRC claim Taiwan? PRC made it very clear that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, we certainly aren't calling for all 21 million people of Taiwan to go live on the Moon, it's you who repeated told all 1.4 billion people to go live on the Moon, then you're the China separator here. And you'll have to wait a really long time for the downfall of the Communist Party of China. I mean, who'd have thought that a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants could seize mainland China from the wealthy, well-armed KMT with their superior numbers? It's like you refuse to accept the reality that PRC won the mainland from ROC, you're just wishing for the Communists to fail because you can't stand to see China succeed that's all.
    1
  20115.  @stopwarstop7334  PRC communists were never in Hong Kong, yet after the 1997 return, Hong Kong is part of China today, then why can't PRC claim Taiwan? And Taiwan is not even a member of the United Nations (like you stated several times) so the UN countries don't even recognize Taiwan as a country, so why can't PRC claim Taiwan as part of China? There's literally nothing Taiwan can do to challenge PRC's claim to Taiwan, yet you're happy that Taiwan is locked out of the benefits of UN membership? This is the first time I hear of someone in Taiwan happy that Taiwan is not a UN member. You don't even know when the CPC will fall, it's like you can't think of anything, except just closing your eyes and imagining the Communist Party downfall that's all. No wonder why Taiwan can't stand up to the mainland, you're just dreaming of CPC downfall because there's literally nothing else you can do about it.
    1
  20116.  @stopwarstop7334  Hong Kong was literally taken from China and made into British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to return what belongs to us. But even though Hong Kong was taken from China by force, it was returned to PRC in peace. And why should the United Kingdom allow the Hong Kong people to vote whether to return to ROC when the United Kingdom doesn't even recognise the ROC? Did you forget that Taiwan is not a UN member and that UN members don't recognize Taiwan as a country? I thought you were so happy to boast that ROC Taiwan is not recognised by UN members. As for Hong Kong voting for independence, the PRC would not allow that, so Hong Kong was returned back to China on 1997. Also, according to statistics, mainland China holds the largest number of Hong Kong expatriates outside of the island itself. Here's the data from Wikipedia: Hongkongers Hongkongers (Total population c. 7.33 million) Regions with significant populations 1. Hong Kong, China (7,234,800) 2. Mainland China (472,900) 3. United States (330,000) 4. Canada (215,775) 5. United Kingdom (145,000) 6. Taiwan, China (87,719) 7. Australia (86,886) 8. Macau, China (19,355) 9. Netherlands (18,300) 10. Japan (18,210) 11. Malaysia (3,000) ... Source: Wikipedia: Hongkongers
    1
  20117. @反共抗俄 你是说，如果你说俄语意味着你在亲吻普京的臀部吗？
    1
  20118. ​ @stopwarstop7334  You said: "One China policy means there is only PRC as member in the UN. It doesn't mean you can take Taiwan." But you yourself reiterated so many times that Taiwan is not a UN member, so why would the UN countries care whether the mainland takes Taiwan or not?
    1
  20119.  @stopwarstop7334  The People's Republic of China and the Republic of China constitution both agree that Taiwan is part of China. Even in the 1972 Shanghai Communique, the United States does not challenge the position that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  20120. @反共抗俄 你是俄罗斯人吗？那你为什么对我说俄语？
    1
  20121. @反共抗俄 如果你想继续说普通话或俄语，没有人会阻止你。 但你无权阻止我使用任何我想交流的语言。
    1
  20122.  @Kingofthehill84  The ancestors of the current Taiwanese aborigines actually came from China. They were farmers that arrived on Taiwan island around 5,000 years ago. (around the time of the start of Chinese history) Around 5,000 years ago, farmers from the southeast Chinese coast settled on the island. These people are believed to have been speakers of Austronesian languages, which dispersed from Taiwan across the islands of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The current Taiwanese aborigines are believed to be their descendants. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan)
    1
  20123. Arun Nair Hong Kong may not have an army of its own, but it does have its own government, which was why One-China Two-Systems policy was introduced by Chinese government. This policy enabled Hong-Kong to keep their existing government and for China to keep ours. ROC is also not a recognised country by many major countries around the world. Even president Trump has affirmed China's One-China Policy recognising Taiwan as part of China, just like Obama did before him as well as Bush's administration and 40 years of USA presidencial history.
    1
  20124. The Emperor Of China Hong-Kong government has accepted a politically different government and so did Macau, so why not ROC as well? Otherwise, how do you propose both states solve the problem and keep our existing governments? You expect PRC give up and become part of ROC? PRC is already offering ROC a chance keep its existing government under the One-China Two-Systems policy, so how is China being unreasonable here?
    1
  20125. The Emperor Of China Why are you insulting me now? Then exactly what do you propose then, since you reject PRC's proposal? Of course its not 100% fair, because PRC is so much larger than Hong-Kong, Macau and Taiwan, but then exactly what do you expect? If Hong-Kong and Macau were "never" countries like you said, then what makes you think ROC is? Do major countries of the world today recognise ROC as a country? You constantly mock my solution then exactly what do you propose to solve the solution? ROC claims all mainland China (including Tibet and Outer Mongolia) belongs to them, but PRC can't claim Taiwan as part of China?
    1
  20126. The Emperor Of China You continue to mock me, when I am simply stating my view, and dismiss my solution without proposing any solution of your own. I don't insult you just because your views differ from mine and if you are against my answer, then why not suggest a solution instead of attacking me personally? "There are many more countries that are much smaller than ROC" but many of them have been officially recognized by UN and most of world's major countries, unlike ROC. This is a fact. Exactly what do you know of ROC political parties? The parties are COLOR-CODED according to their political agenda, where BLUE represents wanting eventual reunification with the mainland such as Kuomintang (KMT) and GREEN representing people who want independence such as Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The nature of democracy is that people can suddenly change their minds and their votes at any time, so what makes you think you know what the people of Taiwan really want? If people of ROC want democracy, and I already proposed that PRC extend the "One-China Two-Systems" policy to include Taiwan as well, so why can't PRC grant democracy to Taiwan under this system? PRC already granted democracy to Hong-Kong and Macau, so why not Taiwan as well?
    1
  20127. The Emperor Of China Chinese government only screens the candidates for election, but otherwise the people of Hong Kong and Macau still get to elect their own leaders by voting. What's wrong with this arrangement? The communist party has to ensure that HK and Macau candidates do not just suddenly declare independence, but otherwise, it is still the people's own votes that bring the person into power. Of course reunifying with PRC is going to result in restrictions of some sort. You think states can just unify just like that, and then continue to enjoy the same freedoms as before? You must be naive if you are thinking this way only. Reunification results in compromise and sacrifice of some sort from both parties. If the Chinese government really wanted to, it can simply abolish the whole "democracy" in HK and Macau government and then working those states into China's economic growth policies. But at the moment, the government lets those states govern their country autonomously, as long as they remain part of China. What has United Nations got to do with this? Even in UN there are laws governing who can join. For example, ROC is no longer recognized by many UN countries, while PRC is recognized as China. Both North and South Korea are UN members but both claim to represent Korea. There are also other states like Palestine and Israel that have their own recognition issues in UN. What makes you think UN doesn't have any rules regarding who can join and go? You have constantly insulted me and mocked my solution, then exactly what do you propose in return? Of course it is not fair, because PRC wields much more power than ROC at the moment, but it is still a compromise that allows both states to keep our respective governments. You think ROC is going to be left the same as it is, even after reunification? Did you even know that ROC wasn't even really democratic until 1987. Like PRC, ROC was ruled by KMT for 37 years (1911-1949) and even in Taiwan, KMT governed Taiwan under martial law for another 38 years. Taiwan under KMT faced much economic development and progress, similar to China in 1970s, but it was only after introduction of democratic voting, did Taiwan's economy slowed and relations between PRC and ROC became strained when the DPP took power. Both KMT and the communist party had eventual goal of reunification of China, but with DPP taking the reins, the government does not know how to handle DPP given its eventual objective.
    1
  20128. +Patrick A. Crawley Exactly how is Chinese government doing that? In the end, HK people are the ones who get to vote to elect the candidates into power, not China.
    1
  20129. What do you people even know about Hong-Kong elections? The 1200 representatives are Hong-Kong citizens aren't they? And in the end, whoever gets elected into power is are determined by the people of Hong-Kong, not by China. Why hold all those elections then, if HK people don't get chance to vote? All China does is clear the candidates to ensure that there aren't any anti-mainland sentiments that could possibly make HK declare itself independent. You people are just biased against China that's all. Since you all disagree with my solution, then why don't you propose solutions of your own? Of course the One-China, Two Systems is not 100% fair and HK is not absolutely 100% democracy, because it is a compromise by both parties. You expect reunification and for HK to still enjoy all the "freedoms"? Of course it won't happen. Otherwise what's the point of reunification then? You people don't actually seem to be living in the real world and still obsessed with ideals and textbook definitions that's all. Why don't you try facing reality for once? Who can say what is really a democracy or not?
    1
  20130. +The Emperor Of China What nonsense are you talking about? As far as I know, the 1200 representatives in the Election Committee are consist of HK businessmen and corporations from various sectors including fiance, tourism, transport, etc. Which part of this committee is consist of Chinese mainlanders? In the end, the votes are all cast by people of HK, so what rubbish are you trying to say here? Election Committee (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Election_Committee ) Han Chinese growth is negative, because of One Child Policy, meant to limit the population growth of China, to prevent overwhelming of resources needed to sustain such population. Before that, Han Chinese growth was far higher than that of other ethnic minorities and China faced a possibly of having insufficient resources to sustain such explosive growth. The One Child Policy did its job, and China's population growth shrank, so recently the government introduced Two-Child Policy instead. USA and China are not at all related to each other in politics, but Hong Kong and the mainland are, under the One China, Two Systems policy. You are trying to compare two different political governing systems altogether, so what nonsense are you trying to create here? Are USA and China related to One China Two System policy like Hong Kong and the mainland here? Otherwise, exactly what point are you trying to make here? If you are really American citizen, then what gives you the right to comment on China's internal political affairs? +Patrick A. Crawley You people did not answer my question, so why should I answer yours? Carrie Lam received 777 out of 1,163 votes cast to become the next chief executive of Hong Kong, so what is wrong with this system? The 1200 votes were made by HK corporations and businesses, so how exactly did the mainland influence this system?
    1
  20131. +Patrick A. Crawley How is that not democracy? Although Carrie Lam was widely seen as Beijing’s preferred candidate, there still needs to be a vote to determine if she will become the leader, and it could have gone either way. As far as I know, all of the voters in 1200 committee were HK citizens and there were no Chinese mainlanders involved in the voting process.
    1
  20132. Patrick A. Crawley Why do you keep asking single statement questions? I am not obliged find out answers for you. You can always calculate the number of people who voted instead keep demanding questions out me. Why don't you find out something for yourself for once?
    1
  20133. Patrick A. Crawley When did I even say that? Hong-Kong was part of China since Qing dynasty so what's wrong with it being returned to China? In 19th century, the British wanted continue drinking our tea, but we didn't want to sell it, so they waged two bloody wars and forced us to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs spreading the addiction throughout China and Hong Kong was stolen from China. So what's wrong with returning Hong Kong back to China? Chinese government can always abolish the democracy, since Hong Kong is recognised as part of China isn't it? The way you phrased your comment is typical of people who admit defeat and run away because they lack any good reply too.
    1
  20134. +Bob Saget Now you are just being anti-Chinese here. Which major country even recognize ROC to be its own country? Even US President Trump has affirmed the One-China Policy, just like Obama before him and Bush, and 40 years of previous US presidents. President Trump recognize Jerusalem to be Israel's capital (much to Palestian's objection) but he doesn't recognize ROC as its own country? The rest of your comment is just hate speech against mainland Chinese that's all. According to China's 2015 tourism statistics. mainland China received the following numbers of international tourists. 1. Hong Kong (81.06 million) 2. Macau (23.5 million) 3. Taiwan (5.48 million) 4. South Korea (4.44 million) 5. Japan (2.49 million) 6. Vietnam (2.16 million) ... ... 12. Singapore (0.9 million) So why do you claim that those countries hate China, if they form majority of China's internationals tourists?
    1
  20135.  @darkhorseman8263  The authorities take DNA and blood samples from the Uighurs as part of a necessary health checkup to screen for potential diseases that's all. Some of these Uighurs may have undeclared diseases or carry them unknowingly so they are health screened as per normal before entering those re-education schools.
    1
  20136.  @ryanmeinecke8260  Don't Westerners also screen their immigrants with blood tests and acquire DNA samples too? You can't refute my points so you start calling me a Chinese propaganda bot?
    1
  20137.  @ryanmeinecke8260  You're from United States? America has the world's largest prison incarceration rate, and its prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government release convicts back onto the streets, to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by incarceration rate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate Having such a significant prison population represents a major drain on the U.S resources needed for upkeep and maintenance of its prisons. Worst thing is that once released, many former-convicts find it hard to integrate back into society and some may return to a life of crime, and wound up behind bars again. At least in China, we are providing free education to potential Uighur extremists and helping train them in job skills to prepare them for the workforce, so that these Uighurs have a higher chance of becoming productive members of society.
    1
  20138.  @ryanmeinecke8260  said "lastly Shenzhou idk who are and I don't really have a problem with you man." You seem to post an excessive amount of comments addressed to me, as though you have a problem with me personally.
    1
  20139.  @ryanmeinecke8260  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major war in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, etc. Whereas the United states is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is enacting regime change by cutting off those countries "heads" and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  20140.  @rjc2630  The British eat fluffy rabbits too in their Rabbit stew recipes so what's your point? And during the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want what the West had to offer, so they waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to spread the addiction through rest of China and Hong Kong was taken from us and made into British colony. When Britain renounced its former colonies, Hong Kong was not even fully returned back to China. Instead, China had to sign a 50-year declaration just for Britain to hand over what is originally ours?
    1
  20141.  @sam_millen  Modern China was built by the sweat, blood, tear and sacrifice of the Chinese people and our government, to turn China from an initially dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, into an economic juggernaut today, a growing scientific and technological power, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, and China today is no longer weak and easily bullied by the foreign powers, instead China has strong global presence as well as being influential player of world politics. And it's all been achieved under the CCP leadership, which Western anti-Communist media has been painting a negative picture of. So why should I believe what Western propaganda has to say about China then?
    1
  20142.  @ryanmeinecke8260  "神州 Shenzhou You're not safe from the United States." The PLA is world's largest land army, and they act as a deterrent against the United States. Our tanks like the Type 99 Main Battletank have commanded healthy respect from international observers as the reported performance parameters are equal to many top Western designs, like Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams, while packing a few unique tricks of its own. Source: China's Deadly Type 99 Tank vs. Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams: Who Wins? nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/chinas-deadly-type-99-tank-vs-russias-t-90-americas-m-1-17836
    1
  20143.  @ryanmeinecke8260  The Type 99 Main Battletank was never used against civilians, what are you talking about? Besides tanks, the PLA also have powerful artillery guns, like the PLZ-05 self-propelled howitzer that been ranked Top 10 howitzer in the world. In Multi-Launch-Rocket Systems (MLRS) China's SR-5, AR3 and WS-2D rank among world's Top 10 MLRS, making the PLA a formidable force to be reckoned with. Video: Top 10 Self Propelled Howitzer in the World youtube.com/watch?v=AQBcIRwg2fg&t=473 Top 10 Multiple Launch Rocket Systems (MLRS) In The World youtube.com/watch?v=66ETMGNrh98&t=756
    1
  20144.  @ryanmeinecke8260  ICBMs? China is home to world's longest range ICBM, the DF-41 with an operational range between 12,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the range of the US LGM-30 Minuteman which has a reported range of 13,000 km. Video: China missile tests DF-41 launch from railroad train youtube.com/watch?v=h2kjMctT8yU&t=13
    1
  20145.  @ryanmeinecke8260  When the USA decides to attack China of course. China has inducted the world's first operational anti-ship ballistic missile, a "carrier killer" capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, known as the DF-21D, launched from safety of the land and is able to target a carrier strike group out at sea. Video: China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile youtube.com/watch?v=p-cEunmqXM8 The DF-21D is launched from land-based mobile launcher and flies high above the stratosphere and using advanced guidance systems to evade anti-missile defenses by warships below, and during reentry, it achieves high hypersonic speeds (Mach 10) and it is even capable of terminal guidance, allow minute adjustments to its flight just seconds before impact, as shown in the above video.
    1
  20146.  @ryanmeinecke8260  The United States is sending warships and aircraft carrier strike groups halfway across the globe to threaten Chinese sovereignty in our own waters. For example, American warships like USS Higgins, USS Antietam, USS McCampbell, USS Curtis Wilbur, etc, have been sailing to within 12 NM of the Chinese Paracel Islands and threatening Chinese sovereignty. China does not want war, but that does not mean we are weak. China is not afraid of war, and the People's Liberation Army will fight to defend our sovereignty and protect our homes and loved ones from the invaders from the opposite side of the globe.
    1
  20147.  @ryanmeinecke8260  Didn't you said earlier yourself that "神州 Shenzhou You're not safe from the United States."? You already know the answer yet you are asking why? Why don't you elaborate on this statement you made earlier then?
    1
  20148. ​ @ryanmeinecke8260  China currently is at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict back in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Mozambique, Nigeria, Chad, Sudan, Kenya, Ghana, Zimbabwe, etc. Whereas the US is a warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, etc, even in the 21st century. The USA is bombing those countries and enacting regime change by cutting off those countries "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. President Trump even narrowly avoided starting a fresh war with Iran recently. So if there's to be any war between our countries, there is high likelihood that USA will strike the first blow.
    1
  20149.  @zetristan4525  "Bhutan (as presented here) represents the spirit and modest governance for happy living and citizens' wellbeing." Since the 1960s, the Bhutanese military have expelled over 100,000 Bhutanese of Nepali origins (around 40% of Bhutan's population at the time). No Bhutanese refugees have been allowed to return to Bhutan despite negotiations taking place. It's because the Bhutanese elite refer to a set of 1984-like principles which are actually also very particularist and serve to justifying Bhutanese exceptionalism and the massive oppression of the southern region of that country. If anything, it sounds more like Western values than Asian values.
    1
  20150.  @zetristan4525  Here's that scathing post you wrote about me in Cyrus Janssen's channel: Goals of @Shenzhou: - Undo past humiliations forever - Live life in Cyrus' Comments section _- Rarely build bridges and international solutions (like Cyrus tries to). - Rehash what we already know to feed antagonism. (Mockery instead of constructive balanced accuracy)
    1
  20151.  @zetristan4525  I've referring to the vitriolic reply you wrote to me on Cyrus Janssen's channel. You accused me of being dishonest, just because I seek to undo humiliation. And let's be clear, almost every Chinese knows about the Century of Humiliation, and yet the downward trend of China in the earlier part of the 20th century has been reversed thanks to the efforts of the Chinese government. So what's wrong with presenting China's achievements under the government? And in that post, you claim I lacked constructive balanced accuracy, yet here in your OP, you've just seemingly accepted Pasal's claim that Bhutan is leading the rise of Asia, when everyone knows it's actually China that's leading the charge, and that Bhutan has hardly any cooperative interaction with China.
    1
  20152.  @zetristan4525  Are you implying that my comments weren't honest elsewhere? I've clearly spelt out my feelings in my comments elsewhere, but you, instead of refuting my points, just claim that my posts lacked "constructive balanced accuracy" without even going into detail yourself why. And let's be clear, almost every Chinese knows about the Century of Humiliation, and yet the downward trend of China in the earlier part of the 20th century has been reversed thanks to the efforts of the Chinese government. Overall, according to surveys the vast majority of Chinese (90%) approve of the Chinese government and what its done for the people.
    1
  20153. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20154.  @DiogoJ1  Ukrainian Army is resorting to recruiting women, teenagers aged 17, as well as men who are missing limbs or otherwise unfit for active military duty.
    1
  20155.  @bartolino980  Why is Ukrainian army resorting to recruiting women, teenagers and men unfit for active military duty then?
    1
  20156.  @DiogoJ1  Where in Russian media does it say that Ukrainian army is recruiting women etc?
    1
  20157.  @DiogoJ1  The NYT is also reporting that Ukraine is recruiting women, so how does your argument still hold water?
    1
  20158.  @DiogoJ1  So why you think the NYT is wrong but the RT article is right? Also not only is Ukraine recruiting women, but also teenagers under 18 years old and also men who have missing limbs or are generally unfit for active frontline duty. How is this no indicative of Ukraine running out of soldiers?
    1
  20159. Georgia's French-born President has announced she would not recognize the election results and refuses to step down once her term is over. All in the name of "democracy."
    1
  20160.  @jakleo337  So why harbor so much hate for Chinese people, our culture and our country?
    1
  20161. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20162. Its a classic example of a Chinese Fire Drill. Or has that term been outlawed already?
    1
  20163. The government have always welcomed Indian to join onboard the Belt and Road Initiative, but if New Delhi refuses then Beijing still respects its decision. Going with Chinese labor is more efficient, because Chinese workers have experience building infrastructure, than local labour. For example, in the Pakistan Economic Corridor project, China imports Chinese workers and building materials like cement, because Pakistan doesn't have enough engineers and lacks the cement production capacity. Pakistan is planning to double cement production and its universities are training more engineers, so that in the future, they can eventually take over Chinese engineers and cement supply once they are capable of it themselves. In the meantime, Pakistan is still getting infrastructure built by Chinese, while it is working to train enough manpower to take over the projects in the future.
    1
  20164. I've seen Western girl crying on TV about having no future because of climate change. Whereas Chinese kids are planting trees and actually interested in combating desertification.
    1
  20165. Agreed. Many Westerners believe the war started just over a month ago, when in fact it had been ongoing since 2014. Over the course of 8 years, some 13 000 have been killed according to UN figures. Russia is not starting a war, they are putting an end to one that began 8 years ago in Donbas.
    1
  20166. Agreed. Many Westerners believe the war started just over a month ago, when in fact it had been ongoing since 2014. Russia is not starting a war, they are putting an end to one that began 8 years ago in Donbas.
    1
  20167. It looks like the U.S is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  20168.  George Haskas  The Soviet Union had great scientific innovation, especially in space. For example, the world's first satellite was Russian Sputnik-1, the first man in space was Russian cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, and the first space station was Soviet Salyut-1. And that happened even while Russia was communist.
    1
  20169.  George Haskas  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE
    1
  20170.  @rg9448  China launched exascale supercomputer prototype, that can perform 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 calculations per second! and is able to quickly analyze massive volumes of data, which will have a profound impact on our research capabilities. Video: youtube.com/watch?v=bPIvoVoUGMY
    1
  20171.  @JeffSpehar-ov1cn  The People's Liberation Army is world's largest land army and rapidly modernizing. Our Type 99 Main Battletank have commanded healthy respect from international observers as the reported performance parameters are equal to many top Western designs, like Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams, while packing a few unique tricks of its own. Source: China's Deadly Type 99 Tank vs. Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams: Who Wins? nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/chinas-deadly-type-99-tank-vs-russias-t-90-americas-m-1-17836
    1
  20172. @nick f China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Mozambique, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Kenya, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, etc, even in the 21st century. The USA is enacting regime change by cutting off those countries "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi) and installing their US puppet governments in place. Now Trump intends to do the same to Assad of Syria and Maduro of Venezuela, and even narrowly avoided starting a fresh war with Iranian supreme leader. China does not want war, but that does not mean we are weak. China is not afraid of war, and we will fight to defend our sovereignty and protect our homes and loved ones from the invaders from across the Pacific Ocean.
    1
  20173.  @rg9448  You are always welcome to come to China and see for yourself. According to World Tourism Rankings, China is world's 4th most visited country, after France, Spain and United States, seeing some 60.7 million international visitors. Source: World Tourism rankings wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings China is also the most popular Asian tourist destination, surpassing even other Asian tourist destinations like Japan, Korea, India, Thailand, Singapore, etc.
    1
  20174. ​ @rg9448  According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Wikipedia: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China
    1
  20175.  @brianplum1825  I simply proven your statement wrong, why resort to labeling me a fifty-cent loser just for refuting your point? As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  20176.  @brianplum1825  About the One Child Policy, in the past China was still dirt-poor country, suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems at that time. Why allow families in China to raise multiple kids, only for them to starve to death, succumb to childhood diseases, and having not enough food, not enough hospitals, and not enough schools to send them all to? Why not make families focus all available resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood, and get him into a good school? According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china Look at India, world's 2nd largest population country, and India is suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems that China once suffered from in the past.
    1
  20177. 23143 4803 Civil War? Hong Kong does not even maintain its own military force, it was under British Army protection while as British colony, and today they are under the People's Liberation Army protection. So how would it be a civil war, when Hong Kong has no army to speak of?
    1
  20178. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms while Chinese President Xi is entering his 3rd term.
    1
  20179. According to it's constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20180. Chinese President Xi is entering his 3rd term while German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms
    1
  20181. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to it's constitution.
    1
  20182.  @educateyourself3872  You said: "1. You’re changing what you said now. You said they “trusted the US” but now you’re changing it to “a level of trust was involved”." Where did I ever said those exact words that they "trusted the US"? Could you quote me where in my post did I specifically said that they "trusted the US" before changing it to "a level of trust was involved"."?
    1
  20183. @ You can't refute my points, now you're resorting to questioning my English proficiency and whether I am a native speaker or not? Look, you're the one claiming that I am "changing what I said now." that I said they _“trusted the US.” Yet when I ask you to quote me my exact words "trusted the US" you've repeatedly failed, so who are you to continue your argument when you can't even quote people properly? Next you said "putting your trust in someone or something is extremely close to trusting someone." meaning that you admit aren't the same, so you're the one assigning different meaning to my words, then how can you claim that I changed my words? You can't even quote my words correctly, yet you accuse me of changing my words? Lastly, you said that "Having a level of trust” is a bit less involved than those two things." meaning that the difference is minimal. Then you suddenly change your stance and said: "More importantly, they are a lot different than “putting your trust in”." then it's apparent that you're the one constantly flip-flopping on your argument. The problem is not my English proficiency, the problem is that you can redefine terms and change your words, and then turn around and accuse me of changing my words.
    1
  20184.  @moow950  If China's One-Party system has shown to be viable for China, then why should China switch to multi-party democracy? Who say's the Chinese Communist Party lacks diversity? The CCP has over 90 million members (about the population size of Germany) As of 30 June 2016, individuals who identify as farmers, herdsmen and fishermen make up 26 million members; members identifying as workers totalled 7.2 million. Another group, consisting of managers, professionals and technicians in enterprises and public institutions made up 12.5 million, 9 million identified as admin staff and 7.4 million described themselves as party cadres. 22.3 million women are CPC members.
    1
  20185.  @suburbenyobbo  CCP is evil? China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana, Chad, Sudan, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, etc, even in the 21st century. The United States is bombing those Middle Eastern countries (Iraq Body Count Project reported some 200,000 Iraqi civilians deaths) and enacting regime change by cutting off those countries "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Source: Iraq Body Count iraqbodycount.org Now it appears that Assad of Syria and Maduro of Venezuela are at risk of US regime change agenda.
    1
  20186.  @suburbenyobbo  Which country is the People's Republic of China currently at war with you tell me? China is not at war with Mali and everyone always say that our army, the People's Liberation Army lacks combat experience, so how is China involved in any war? What "war within its own borders in Xinjiang" are you talking about? Which army is the PLA facing off against?
    1
  20187.  @suburbenyobbo  Source: China overtakes US as Africa’s top trading partner businessdailyafrica.com/corporate/539550-850122-5hnojiz/index.html
    1
  20188.  @suburbenyobbo  Why don't you answer my question about which country is China currently at war with, instead of asking your own?
    1
  20189.  @suburbenyobbo  China overtook America to become Africa's largest trading partner. Since you repeated your point, then so can I.
    1
  20190. Some people (but not all) still suffer from the "colonial mentality" that continues to plague former colonies long after decolonization. Even though many countries have physically decolonized, mentally, the "decolonization of the mind" is still ongoing, in order to heal the mental damage inflicted by the colonizer on the minds of the colonized.
    1
  20191. Quickest way to debunk the West's Xinjiang genocide allegations is to ask: "Where are the bodies? Where are the Uighur refugees that would flooding the neighboring regions of Xinjiang, just like the Jew refugees during the Holocaust? Why has the USA accepted 0 Uighur refugees over the past two fiscal years?"
    1
  20192. 中巴是全天候友谊，我们两国的长久友好关系建基于互信、互惠互利、相互尊重和互不干涉内政等原则。
    1
  20193. America's Skylab spacestation also made news headlines during its reentry back to Earth in 1979. China's Tiangong-1 was launched in 2011, with expected operational lifespan of 2 years, but its already 2018, and this is only the natural conclusion to the spacestation at the end of its lifespan.
    1
  20194. PJ Brown Soviet Union spacestation Mir also reenter the Earth's atmosphere in 2001 so isn't this the natural conclusion to spacestations at the end of their service?
    1
  20195. +PJ Brown Tiangong-1 broke up over the Pacific Ocean during its reentry, so what's the whole fuss about then? Experts been claiming the probability of getting hit by debris is one in a trillion or so, why are you insulting Chinese people and our achievements? China is 3rd country in the world to independently launch and operate spacestations of our own, so this gives you the right to mock our achievements?
    1
  20196.  @Todd-rk2lb  用中文字写
    1
  20197.  @BINI_Maloi_Colet  Why can't you refute my points? Instead you go around hurling accusations against me just because my views happen to differ from yours.
    1
  20198.  @bruceplenderleith838  "神州 Shenzhou do you think the rocket is where it landed? it's been moved." Do you have evidence that the rocket was moved?
    1
  20199. ​ @zen-mc4ju I know of a small country that, despite the odds against it, is still able to enact geopolitically change and it is Yemen. Even the warships and aircraft carriers of the US Navy aren't able ensure protection for western-aligned cargo vessels passing through the Red Sea.
    1
  20200. Despite this, Western MSM are unwilling to call attention to Abe's remarks, instead they want to scapegoat China as somehow being behind the assassination.
    1
  20201. China has our own Internet giants, like Tencent, Alibaba, Baidu, etc. Here is a list of world's largest Internet companies, but how many of them are Indian? Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies
    1
  20202. The solution is to defund and dismantle the U.S Military Industrial Complex.
    1
  20203. Pierre Venter Have you seen this aerial footage of Shanghai back in 2017 Video: 'Shanghai' - LAOWA 7.5mm f/2 Aerial Footage on DJI Inspire 2 youtu.be/1cC-j4_NtvE?t=6
    1
  20204.  @faithfulwarrior8051  Didn't you read my previous article on China's expanding Christian population? The number of Christians in Communist China is growing so steadily that by 2030, we could have more churchgoers than America. Source: China on course to become 'world's most Christian nation' within 15 years telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/10776023/China-on-course-to-become-worlds-most-Christian-nation-within-15-years.html
    1
  20205.  @pithikoulis  Is there even any proof that the police officers were in cahoots with the Triads. But let's just go with the your case that proof exists and the police officers are guilty, but look at Hong Kong now and Hong Kong is in chaos. The Hong Kong Police Department needs all the available resources and manpower it can rally to deal with the protests, so the case would have to be put on hold at least until the end of the Hong Kong riots.
    1
  20206.  @pithikoulis  Where's the proof of your claims then? And Carrie Lam already formally withdrawn the HK extradition bill, so why do the Hong Kong protests still continue? For 4 months already? It's almost as if some foreign anti-China power is secretly sponsoring the Hong Kong protests to continue from behind the scenes, to drive a wedge between Hong Kong and the mainland.
    1
  20207.  @pithikoulis  From video footage, some Hong Kong protestors can be seen waving United States Flag 🇺🇲 and the United Kingdom Flag 🇬🇧 so could it be these countries that are sponsoring the protests? Otherwise, why the protests last for so long, already into their 5th month? Surely there's some anti-China organisation funding the continuation of these protests, to drive a wedge between Hong Kong and the mainland. And Hong Kong has democracy, so what are these protestors complaining about? Previously, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule from 1841-1997, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before?
    1
  20208.  @pithikoulis Look at the updates in Hong Kong and the HK students have barricaded themselves in university campuses, blocked roads and bridges, turning their centers of learning into fortresses, manufacturing petrol bombs, weapons like bows and arrows, bamboos catapults and slingshots. Video: A bird's eye view of Hong Kong Universities turned into fortresses during protests youtu.be/vyp2WYahCrA And those who protestors in the mainland aren't waving United States Flag 🇺🇲 or United Kingdom Flag 🇬🇧 like some of the protestors in Hong Kong, so what makes you think they are sponsored by foreign powers? You can't refute my points about Hong Kong, so you turn the topic to the mainland?
    1
  20209. Yes. When U.S diplomats travel to other countries, they always put American interests ahead of their "allies".
    1
  20210.  @nickiseb8910  "神州 Shenzhou of course there is a Phillipien sea." Look up the world map. There is no Philippine Sea, but there's the South China Sea.
    1
  20211.  @nickiseb8910  Like I said, the Greeks are perhaps the only ancient people, apart from the Chinese, that preserved the same language, culture, and national identity throughout their history. Egyptian Civilization is no more, just like the Republic of Rome eventually crumbled. Turkiye today is not the same as Anatolia.
    1
  20212.  @Data2watch  You're right. But the modern nation of Egypt is not the ancient Egyptian civilization of old. Take Egyptian hieroglyphs for example, and the people of Egypt no long use this script. Whereas Chinese characters are among the oldest continuously used system of writing in the world, having been in use since 1200 BC. Even Latin that was used in Ancient Rome, is today considered a dead language, much like Egyptian hieroglyphs, since it's no longer evolving with the times and no new words are being added to its vocabulary. Whereas Chinese characters are considered alive today as new characters are being added to the Chinese vocabulary.
    1
  20213.  @Data2watch  Ancient China has survived to modern times relatively intact. If you look up the Map of Egypt, it has lost much of its former territory like Sudan. The Republic of Rome too, has also broken up into various countries like France, Spain, Algeria, Tukiye, Egypt, etc. Whereas China today still consists of Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, and so on, of which are still part of China. Simplified Chinese is also use in other parts of the world, such as Singapore. And even during the Republic of China, the KMT considered implementing Simplified Chinese into the education system. Nevertheless, Traditional Chinese characters are still used in China for shop house names, song lyrics as well as Chinese historical dramas.
    1
  20214.  @hockchweeong9883  You're referring to the Fenghuang (鳳凰)?
    1
  20215.  @edwin2600  The British and Canadian governments literally control the purse strings of BBC and CBC respectively, just like how Fox News are controlled by the Republicans and CNN by the Democrats. If say Fox News decides to isolate their Republican supporter base, they'll be literally committing ratings suicide the same as if CNN does to their Democrat supporter base. So why remain oblivious that these media are in fact controlled by their government? Another thing to note is that Russia's point of view is largely absent in the EU after they banned RT news and Sputnik Radio, so there's an imbalance in Western media on portrayal of world events. Why do you think that many Westerners often regard their own MSM as "fake news"?
    1
  20216. For people wanting to visit Xinjiang, here's a short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China. (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience) Video: youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA
    1
  20217. The communist party had fewer numbers than KMT during Sino-Japanese war, so obviously resorted to guerilla tactics suitable for fighting against a superior opponent. Also, the KMT was heavily corrupted and often perceived as the foreigner's lackey, which made them unpopular at that time by many Chinese people. As for hatred towards Japan, other countries like South Korea have also expressed displeasure with Japan's refusal to acknowledge "comfort women", and the victims (now in their 80s and 90s) are most likely going to die without proper acknowledgement. Japanese textbooks currently depict "comfort women" as well-paid government prostitutes. Even the PyeongChang Winter Olympics failed to resolve this issue between Japan and South Korea.
    1
  20218. Nabium In US culture, there is this "Zombie Apocalypse" scenario which is very popular, and incorporated into their shows, movies, even video games. There are many Halloween costume where you dress up as Zombie, so why is you claim The Walking Dead does not open Chinese up to Western culture? Where is your logic here? Chinese people watch whatever television series that they like, so why are you so concerned about what Chinese people watch on TV? China is not the only country to accept a film or series which had some controversial opinions. Here is list of banned films in countries like USA, Canada, Australia and UK. Sources: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_banned_in_Australia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_banned_in_Canada en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_banned_in_the_United_States en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_banned_in_the_United_Kingdom So how the above countries any different from China, in banning controversial movies? Every country has some degree of control over censorship. Are you implying that just because your country banned only hardcore pornographic movies only, means China should follow your country? That theory is still a theory that existed, so why can't Chinese teach it in our classes? By 1952 Peking Man was considered by some to be a direct ancestor of modern humans and some paleontologists have noted a perceived continuity in skeletal remains, according to the following source Source:An early modern human from Tianyuan Cave, Zhoukoudian, China ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1871827/ Just because Westerners reject it, does it mean China has to reject it? There is still much information about our origins that is unclear. For example, you said there is up to 4% DNA from Denisovan hominins that the rest of the world do not share, which has been found in East Asians, Melanesians, Aboriginals and Native Americans. But we hardly know anything about these Denisovans, what they looked like, what they eat, how do they live, whether they spoke, etc. What if suddenly in future another theory reveals that we have another distant homonid that is previously undiscovered, like Denisovans? If you open up your country completely, like in US and Europe, then you will subjecting your local population to immigrants, whom may not share your own culture. Europe is taking in up tens of thousands (perhaps millions) of refugees from the Middle East, seeking to escape the constant wars, but that does not mean that all these immigrants will assimilate into the country. Even Europeans are starting to complain about the refugee crisis, that how the population demographic is changing, and European culture is being "diluted". China should do well to avoid such scenario as faced in Western country. We should preserve our culture, our language, our traditions as much we can, while of course remaining open to other cultures, through television, movies, media, etc.
    1
  20219. Hali Still, I said nothing about how many people around the world want to live in China. All I said was Europe and America were more open to accepting immigrants and until the number of immigrants is being seen as having an effect on their culture in Europe. And I talked about the possibility of the same thing happening in China, but I did not say anything about how many people around the world want to live in China.
    1
  20220. Nabium I have shown that other countries also have varying degrees of film censorship. China's censorship happens to have higher degree of censorship, but what's wrong with that? Aren't countries allowed to have their own censorship laws? Even in your country, hardcore pornographic films are still censored so that proves that censorship laws are in place in your country isn't it? You claim I lack critical thinking skills? In US culture, the "Zombie Apocalypse" scenario is very popular, and has been incorporated into their shows, movies, video games and Halloween costumes, so why is you claim The Walking Dead series does not open Chinese up to Western culture? Where is your logic here? How is Falun Gong a "religion" ? It was formed in 1992 by a charismatic leader, Li Hongzhi so its only less than 30 years old. It hijacks concepts from Buddhism, Taoism and Traditional Chinese Qigong, so that should sound off alarm bells that it is a cult in the making. Falun Gong practitioners believe that their leader can cure cancer, and there are cases of early stage cancer patients refusing to seek actual medical treatment, because Falun Gong leader says he can cure them. Source: culteducation.com/group/1254-falun-gong/6922-is-falun-gong-a-cult.html If immigration is irrelevant then why is Europe facing an immigration crisis? Why is President Trump banning Muslims immigrants from seven Middle Eastern countries? Nobody force your countries to host Falun Gong members, and you can always turn them over to Chinese authorities if you refuse to accept them. According to your Freedom of Press Index, there is no information for countries like USA, so how can you be sure that countries like USA is "free"? Also, I have never claimed China is free of censorship, all I claimed is that other countries including USA, Canada, UK, Australia have censorship laws of their own, and that some films are banned in those countries. But why should China change our censorship laws just because people like you are upset with them, and complaining about what movies we watch, whether Japanese anime, HK movies, American action movies. etc? You are the one complaining here, not me. Lastly, Liu Xiaobo 刘晓波 died in jail due to cancer so why are you claiming that the government killed him? Cancer is disease that can affect anyone in the world regardless of where they are, so why are you blaming the Chinese government as its cause? I think you are the one refusing to apply your critical thinking skills here, and just being blaming everything on China that's all.
    1
  20221. amor sen 我说错了什么？我用逻辑回复这些人，但他们已经被西方媒体洗脑了。
    1
  20222. Nabium How do you know that the whole of Norwegian people choose to censor porn? Majority wins, doesn't mean that the minority doesn't exist do they? The only way the whole of Norway chooses to censor something is when 100% of them agree to it. Where is your logic here? You people always bring up "freedom of speech" but all it is important to is only to people who believe in it. Look at Chinese people. We have access to food, education, safety, housing, modern technology like smartphones, computers, and even the Internet. And we are doing just find without your definition of "freedom of speech" so why is it so important then? Chinese tourists and students come to your country, and they can talk about whatever they want can't they? So why are you imposing your own personal standards of "freedom of speech" onto China? My talk about Halloween, is because you said: " Transformers and the Walking Dead are not going to open anyone's eyes about other cultures. " and I clearly shown that Americans have these "Zombie Apocalypse" culture, so why is the Walking Dead not going to open Chinese people's eyes about American culture? Likewise, Transformers is based on Japanese "mecha" culture, so why is Transformers not opening Chinese eyes to Japanese cultures? Where is your logic here? When did I defend murdering and imprisoning people just because they believe they can cure cancer? All I said was that they have the makings of a cult, and I have shown sources supporting my point. You claim that tens of thousand of people who have been killed, then where's your source for that? The original topic of discussion is about China "opening up" our borders so why is immigration irrelevant in this discussion? On the other hand, what has censorship got to do with China opening up our borders at all? You are the one suddenly talking about censorship laws here, when it is about China opening up instead. That means that there is incomplete information about USA, so why is it just accepted that USA is at rank 43? Why isn't there information of freedom of press for people of US overseas territories? These are the territories that are unable to participate in US presidential elections, such as Guam, so how can you know what the people of these territories feel? You said "Your government is imprisoning and even killing people with differing opinions. 刘晓波 died in jail last year, having done no other crime than having an opinion." didn't you? What makes you think Reporters without Borders is free from any governmental pressure? In 2007 John Rosenthal argued that RWB showed a bias in favor of European countries. In the 2009 article about RWB and Venezuela cited above, Salim Lamrani stated that "RSF is not an organization that defends freedom of the press, but is an obscure entity with a political agenda precisely commissioned to discredit through all possible means the progressive governments in the world that find themselves on the United States' blacklist." The Observatoire de l'Action Humanitaire (Centre for Humanitarian Action) criticized RWB's lukewarm criticism of US forces for their shelling, in 2003, of Palestine Hotel, in Baghdad, Iraq, which killed two Reuters journalists.
    1
  20223. wisdomleader2017 Why are you stalking me now? Also your picture was proven to be a fake, since it has obviously been edited just to make me look bad that's all.
    1
  20224.  @COYS-o2i  China is following "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics", by first prioritizing the lives of the people ultimately over that of business and the economy. Can you imagine how worst the situation in Shanghai would be if the government had not implemented lockdown at all, and just allowed the virus to spread rampantly and claim more lives?
    1
  20225.  @kammonkam4905  Lu Muying was not counted because her lung scans did not show a patient with evidence of pneumonia, so they are considered asymptomatic even if they test positive for Covid.
    1
  20226.  @kammonkam4905  Whichever way you choose to count it, can you imagine how worst it would have been if Shanghai had not implemented lockdown and just allowed the virus to spread rampant and claim more lives? You're basically reinforcing the need for Shanghai to take necessary measures to prevent any more unnecessary deaths.
    1
  20227.  @kammonkam4905  If what you're claiming is true, then you're basically supporting the need for Shanghai to take precautions to reduce the number of cases. Can you imagine how worst it would have been, if Shanghai had not implemented lockdown?
    1
  20228.  @Hanabis924  The once strictly zero Covid policy in China, has since morphed into a new dynamic zero Covid policy. As with any pivoting, there's bound to be a period of readjustment and recalibration according to changing ground conditions, and mistakes can crop up during implementation of new policy. But it should be realized that the situation would most likely be far worst had Shanghai not implemented lockdown at all, and just allowed the virus to take its course.
    1
  20229.  @Hanabis924  Like I said, China's zero covid policy has since morphed into a dynamic zero covid policy according to ground conditions. The disruption to the economy is regrettable, but necessary in order to save lives.
    1
  20230.  @kammonkam4905  Had Hong Kong not done that, then the asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients would have gone on to spread the virus and cause more elderly to die because of the virus. I've answered that Lu Muying was not counted because her lung scans did not show a patient with evidence of pneumonia, so they are considered asymptomatic even if they test positive for Covid, so how have I not answered anything? It's you who refuse to accept my answers that's all. It's not a siege, because nobody is starving to death, and there's supplies being distributed, just that people can't get access to certain supplies that they want, but not need. The basic necessities for each citizens are met.
    1
  20231. China is following "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics", by first prioritizing the lives of the people ultimately over that of business and the economy. Can you imagine how worst the situation in Shanghai would be if the government had not implemented lockdown at all, and just allowed the virus to spread rampantly and claim more lives?
    1
  20232.  @limlisa  What makes you think the zero covid policy is not working? Take Shenzhen for example, they had a lockdown (Omicron variant too) and they have since recovered and reopened. It just goes to show that such a policy can be effective if handled properly.
    1
  20233. James Stepp Since when did USA help China join the WTO? WTO was formed in 1995 and China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate our country as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because United States, European countries, and Japan requested that China first reform our economic policies. The US imposed additional conditions on China and China had to agree to considerably harsher conditions than other developing countries. So don't act like the USA helped China to join WTO when its just your own biased Western propaganda telling you so. If the South China Sea dispute has nothing to do with USA, then why is USA sending warships and aircraft carriers from across the Pacific Ocean to SCS? USA is not a claimant in this dispute so why is it interfering in affairs halfway across the globe? As for your statistics about China's debt, if China were really much in debt, then why would China buy about $1.2 trillion dollars worth of US debt then?
    1
  20234. James Stepp So according to your source, how did USA help China to join WTO at all? President Clinton was the one opposing China's joining the WTO during its founding, so what sort of "help" is this, other than furthering US's own interests? If you do not trust Chinese government, then you can't expect Chinese to trust your government. Who are you to interfere in other countries' affairs about whether they choose to be authoritarian or not? If China follows our own system, then its our own system after all. China is currently peaceful and not at war with any country, since our last major war in 1979, but America fought wars at halfway across the globe, such as Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan war, even in the 21st century. America wants to defend "freedom of navigation"? The USA does not even ratify the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea at all, so why is USA claiming "freedom of navigation" when it is not even party to UNCLOS? If China doesn't buy US debt, then how do you expect USA to handle its debts then? Western media like Fox News and CNN constantly paint China as the enemy, talking about pontential war scenario with China and going to trade war with China, whereas Chinese media like CGTN and New China TV talk about promoting peaceful cooperation with the West and how both Chinese and Western government system can both exist in the world. So which country is demonizing the other here? Even President Trump just unilaterally slap tariffs on steel and aluminum, without even going through the proper WTO channels at all here.
    1
  20235. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiment in the West against Russia and China. And it's having the effect of pushing both our countries closer together than we've ever been.
    1
  20236. China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain, whereas the US sees everything as a zero sum game.
    1
  20237. +Dean Cutler I'm saying that the Soviet "Communists" defeated the Japanese, in case you didn't get it the 1st time. And CCP was much smaller than the KMT, so they resorted to tactics suitable for a small force to fight against a larger force (like Guerrilla Tactics for example). Also, KMT losing 10 times as many losses as CCP, doesn't mean that KMT actually "defeated" the Japanese. Whoever counts your own losses as defeating the enemy?
    1
  20238.  @hyc1266  Did you perhaps have to fork out more money for your Made-In-USA New Balance shoes, as compared to Made-in-China? It's possible that in order to cut costs, the U.S manufacturers choose to skim on quality, in order to make their product's prices more competitive with Made-in-China goods. Could that be the reason why your shoes broke?
    1
  20239. +adlerzwei How is the communist party taking away Hong Kong's freedoms? Hong Kong people still get to elect their leader (Chief Executive Officer) so what seems to be the problem?
    1
  20240. +adlerzwei The CCP only approves which HK candidate is applying for the positions. There's usually about 3 approved candidates and the HK people vote for their favorite candidate into power, and CCP does not get to choose which of the 3 becomes HK's Chief Executive officer. That is decided by a group called the HK Election Committee and they mostly consist of HK business groups.
    1
  20241. +Alice Evonic The KMT (Taiwan) lost the Chinese Civil war for the mainland, and they fled to Taiwan, so what gives Taiwan the right to rule China? Why couldn't the KMT (Nationalists) hold on to the mainland?
    1
  20242. 777 voters elect Carrie Lam as Hong Kong’s first female leader Source: hongkongfp.com/2017/03/26/breaking-carrie-lam-elected-hong-kongs-first-female-leader/
    1
  20243.  @super_slav91  What "agreement of independence" are you even talking about? Hong Kong is not independent, it's part of China under the "One Country, Two Systems Policy." Hong Kong being independent is basically a "Two Countries" policy.
    1
  20244. China actually faces a shortage of police officers, with only 143 police officers per 100,000 people, below the international median of 300 police officers per 100,000. So surveillance system and advanced facial recognition software help make up for the shortfall in police officers.
    1
  20245.  Akimbo Soulassassin  If China can someday surpass the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this eventual goal of ours? Nobody said that the USA has to be on top all the time.
    1
  20246.  Akimbo Soulassassin  The current World Order made by Westerners has problems like disproportionately favoring the developed Western countries and not the developing countries in South America, Africa and South East Asia. Developed countries make up only 17% of the world's population and the majority the world's population are actually living in developing countries. China's status as a developing country country would provide much needed balance in a world dominated by developed countries.
    1
  20247. USA will win without a doubt, laughing from across the Pacific Ocean, as whole of Asia breaks out in war between India and China, destroying the fragile economic growth Asia has been experiencing the past few years, and allowing USA to race ahead.
    1
  20248. The difference is that Solomon Islands is a sovereign nation, whereas Ukraine isn't a sovereign nation ever since the 2014 coup de'tat ousting President Yanukovych and installing U.S puppet into Kiev.
    1
  20249.  @tingli3403  Look at prosperous Shenzhen in the mainland, just across from Hong Kong and Shenzhen’s economy surpassed Hong Kong in 2017. Source: Shenzhen surpasses US$338 billion GDP mark in 2017, beats Hong Kong and Singapore’s growth scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2128310/shenzhen-88-cent-hi-tech-growth-roll-hit-y2tr-2017 Shenzhen is roughly the same economic size as Singapore and Hong Kong, recorded nominal output of 2.2 trillion yuan (US$338 billion) in 2017 thanks to its booming hi-tech sector. Over 40% of the output came from “innovative” businesses such as internet, biotech and telecom, the report said. And that's in spite of Shenzhen being under authoritarian CCP rule and Hong Kong being under democratic Hong Kong government rule.
    1
  20250.  @tingli3403  End of discussion? Why'd you can't bear to face China's success?
    1
  20251. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20252. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  20253. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20254. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  20255. 觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20256. 觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  20257.  @ankurantil6137  "not even an inch of land will be given to China because it's greed can never be satisfied" It's astonishing how on one hand you claim China is greedy, yet on the other you're advocating for India to take over Tibet and Mount Kailash. Aren't you projecting here? "( not even after occupying Tibbet, east turkistan ( Xinjiang) , South magnolia, Yunan, Manchuria, Taiwan, hongkong)" Tibet was incorporated into Yuan Dynasty China by Mongols (same with Inner Mongolia). The Manchu conquerors did a similar thing with Tibet during the Qing Dynasty (they also made Manchuria part of China). Hong Kong and Taiwan were also part of China during the Qing Dynasty (just look up the Map of Qing Dynasty) Xinijang was part of China since Han Dynasty (200~ BC) and it was known as Xiyu (西域). The name East Turkestan was coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists (including Nikita Bichurin) who intended the name to replace the common Western term for the region, Chinese Turkestan. So it's just a rename of what is historically considered Chinese territory.
    1
  20258.  @ankurantil6137  "not even an inch of land will be given to China because it's greed can never be satisfied" It's astonishing how on one hand you claim China is greedy, yet on the other you're advocating for India to take over Tibet and Mount Kailash. "( not even after occupying Tibbet, east turkistan ( Xinjiang) , South magnolia, Yunan, Manchuria, Taiwan, hongkong)" Tibet was incorporated into Yuan Dynasty China by Mongols (same with Inner Mongolia). The Manchu conquerors did a similar thing with Tibet during the Qing Dynasty (they also made Manchuria part of China). Hong Kong and Taiwan were also part of China during the Qing Dynasty (just look up the Map of Qing Dynasty) Xinijang was part of China since Han Dynasty (200~ BC) and it was known as Xiyu (西域). The name East Turkestan was coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists (including Nikita Bichurin) who intended the name to replace the common Western term for the region, Chinese Turkestan. So it's just a rename of what is historically considered Chinese territory.
    1
  20259.  @ankurantil6137  "( not even after occupying Tibbet, east turkistan ( Xinjiang) , South magnolia, Yunan, Manchuria, Taiwan, hongkong)" Tibet was incorporated into Yuan Dynasty China by Mongols (same with Inner Mongolia). The Manchu conquerors did a similar thing with Tibet during the Qing Dynasty (they also made Manchuria part of China). Hong Kong and Taiwan were also part of China during the Qing Dynasty (just look up the Map of Qing Dynasty) Xinijang was part of China since Han Dynasty (200~ BC) and it was known as Xiyu (西域). The name East Turkestan was coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists (including Nikita Bichurin) who intended the name to replace the common Western term for the region, Chinese Turkestan. So it's just a rename of what is historically considered Chinese territory.
    1
  20260.  @ankurantil6137  "( not even after occupying Tibbet, east turkistan ( Xinjiang) , South magnolia, Yunan, Manchuria, Taiwan, hongkong)" Tibet was incorporated into Yuan Dynasty China by Mongols (same with Inner Mongolia). The Manchu conquerors did a similar thing with Tibet during the Qing Dynasty (they also made Manchuria part of China). Hong Kong and Taiwan were also part of China during the Qing Dynasty (just look up the Map of Qing Dynasty)
    1
  20261. If during wartime, will Hindu troops actually harm cows if necessary?
    1
  20262. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20263. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20264. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  20265. Taiwan's is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20266. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20267. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms and would have done a 5th if she didn't voluntarily withdrew her candidacy from the last German election. Whereas Chinese President Xi Jinping is only entering his 3rd term.
    1
  20268. Chinese President Xi Jinping is only entering his 3rd term, whereas German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms and would have done a 5th if she didn't voluntarily withdrew her candidacy from the last German election.
    1
  20269. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20270. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20271. The Ukrainian conflict is forcing the United States to turn its attention away from Asia to focus on Eastern Europe, which a reprieve for China, even if only temporary.
    1
  20272. I showed people this short 3 min video of Urumuqi, Xinjiang's capital in China, and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! Video:youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD full screen for the best experience)
    1
  20273. I showed people this short 3 min video of Urumuqi, Xinjiang's capital in China, and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! Video:youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA
    1
  20274. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20275. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  20276.  @pedroferreras450  There are expats in China that talk about political events. Most of them realized how they've been fooled by the media in their home countries about China, until they actually set foot in China and seen what life is really like here for themselves.
    1
  20277. Trump's Chinese nickname is Chuan Jianguo (川建国) meaning "Make China Great." Due to his policies, overseas Chinese intellectuals are facing discrimination in their host country, and many have opted to return to their motherland and contribute their talents, resulting in what's called a "reverse brain drain" in China.
    1
  20278.  @MarkYeung1  So literally anyone can be detained in Canada (for nearly 3 years in Meng's case)? Then Canada has no right to preach to China about following the "rule of law" according to your logic.
    1
  20279.  @WeCube1898  Tibet was annexed by Mongols during Yuan Dynasty and by Manchu during Qing Dynasty. Today, countries all over the world recognise Tibet Autonomous Region as part of the People's Republic of China. Just look up the Map of PRC and Tibet is clearly part of China today.
    1
  20280.  John Buffalo I am 98  It's no secret today that the West (primarily America) is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set, and many economists firmly believe China's economy will surpass the United State's some time in the near future.
    1
  20281.  @cosuinofdeath  Why not attempt to refute my points instead of mocking me as a toy soldier?
    1
  20282.  @tengteng4076  "神州 Shenzhou what did i say for accusing me like that?" You said: "神州 Shenzhou your ancient chinese ancestors were born farmers..born to till your useless vast land"
    1
  20283.  @tengteng4076  Didn't you admitted earlier that China had not colonized a single country? What invasion and plundering the resources of other nations? Everyone knows about the Western colonisation of America, Australia, Asia and African countries, they imported African slaves to pick cotton, caused genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, occupying their lands even till today, and plundering resources like gold from those places. As for China, China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: Wikipedia: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities
    1
  20284.  @tengteng4076  Let's get this straight, you yourself said earlier that China had not colonized a single country (those are your own words) so you yourself aren't considering those places countries. Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China (and Qing Dynasty made Manchuria part of China). Xinjiang was part of China since Han Dynasty (200 BC) before Jesus Christ himself was born, and was known as Xiyu (西域). Here's a map of Yuan Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of China (images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/04/yuan.jpg ) Here's a map of Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of China (images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/06/f114660d2bf5452994135c4c.gif )
    1
  20285.  @tengteng4076  Who is using BS? I literally gave you the Chinese Character Yuan元 for Yuan Dynasty and Qing清 for Qing Dynasty, why did Mongols and Manchu use those Chinese names? And since you admitted earlier that China had not colonized a single country that means you support the claims that these territories are part of China.
    1
  20286.  @tengteng4076  Because your statement was talking about explorers, not colonizers then clearly Zheng He ranks among the greatest explorers isn't it? And once again, you're reinforcing your earlier statement that China had not colonized a single country that means you acknowledged Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria are part of China isn't it?
    1
  20287.  @realitycheck8991  "China doesn't respect the one country,two systems. The joint declaration hasn't been honored by China." As far as I know, Hong Kong is democracy, and people of Hong Kong get to vote for their favorite leaders. Mainland China casts zero votes in Hong Kong election, and the current Hong Kong Chief Executive 香港特首 is Carrie Lam, who won the 2017 election garnering over 700 votes out of the 1200-member Election committee (which consists of Hong Kong groups) and was appointed by the central government. So how is China not honoring the joint declaration then?
    1
  20288.  @ronniechew6566  The 1979 Sino-Vietnamese skirmish was more of a punitive mission undertaken by Vice Premier Deng Xiaoping to punish Vietnam for their 1978 invasion of Kampuchea (Cambodia), overthrowing the Government of Kampuchea, and occupied Cambodia. It's been suggested that at that time, U.S President Jimmy Carter wanted to widen the Sino-Soviet split, so he made a deal with Deng that if China punished Vietnam (a Soviet ally) then U.S-China relations would improve.
    1
  20289. This interview would have been better if they left out the political tones near the end.
    1
  20290. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20291.  @joshlewis575  Not only do the polls and surveys indicate high approvals for Putin and Xi, but also low approvals for the leaders of western democracies. If you don't believe that, just look at the various strikes and protests occurring in the streets in many western democracies.
    1
  20292.  @AmbietsRato  "Consider the immense loss of life in Afghanistan caused by the Soviet Union..." Like I said earlier, Russia today is no longer the Soviet Union of the past. Russia today is no longer interested in spreading Soviet ideology, whereas the United States still continues to spread its ideology today, even in Afghanistan, although the democratic experiment ended in failure. You said: "I encourage you also to research who initiated the Korean and Vietnam Wars..." Korea once existed as a single unified country during Joseon Dynasty, until Imperial Japan invaded it and occupied Korea during WWII. After the WWII Japanese surrender, Korea was (needlessly) divided into North Korea (by Soviet Union) and South Korea (by United States). North Korea wanted to end the humiliating division of its country and reunify its divided country that's all. But just as Korea was 90% unified by the North, the US decided to intervene in this Korean civil war, and they pushed the North Koreans back past the 38th Parallel and into actual North Korean territory, right up to China's doorstep (near Liaoning province) In the end, China decided to aid North Korea and push the US forces back to the 38th Parallel.
    1
  20293.  @norbertdosa2016  "You wrote this....I wrote a reflection to this comment. Please stick in your respons to what I have written," What did you wrote? Your reflection does not appear on my screen. Your last post to me was this one: "@Shenzhou. Are you really that ignorant?...."
    1
  20294.  @MarkYeung1  Taiwan had been ruled by the authoritarian single party Kuomintang party for more than half its life. For decades, the KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, and KMT leader Chiang kai-Shek was a dictator who tolerated no challenge to his rule and jailed/executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived). KMT also imposed martial law on Taiwan for 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. This period of Taiwan history was known as White Terror (白色恐怖) Yet under KMT rule, Taiwan's economy flourished in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹) and Taiwan became one of the Four Asian Tigers/Dragons. Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7% from 1952 to 1982, and Taiwan's GDP grew by 360% between 1965 and 1986. But Taiwan's economic growth became more modest in 1990s once democracy was introduced to the island, and today, Taiwan's economy is stagnate, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, and many Taiwan graduates are seeking employment opportunities in mainland China.
    1
  20295.  @tomaszzap9574  "NavM23 Probably not...For sure, not for a better one." What makes you think it's not a better one? One things for sure, the current unipolar world is unfair, it favors a few nations at the expense of the rest of the global majority. What Russia and China are doing is seeking for more multipolarity and providing an alternative voice to the unipolar world.
    1
  20296.  @MarkYeung1  Taiwan had been ruled by the authoritarian single party Kuomintang party for more than half its life. For decades, the KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, and KMT leader Chiang kai-Shek was a dictator who tolerated no challenge to his rule and jailed/executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived). KMT also imposed martial law on Taiwan for 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Yet under KMT rule, Taiwan's economy flourished in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle and Taiwan became one of the Four Asian Tigers/Dragons. Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7% from 1952 to 1982, and Taiwan's GDP grew by 360% between 1965 and 1986. But Taiwan's economic growth became more modest in 1990s once democracy was introduced to the island, and today, Taiwan's economy is stagnate, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, and many Taiwan graduates are seeking employment opportunities in mainland China.
    1
  20297.  @MarkYeung1  Taiwan had been ruled by the authoritarian single party Kuomintang party for more than half its life. For decades, the KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist in a period known as was known as White Terror. KMT also imposed martial law on Taiwan for 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Yet under KMT rule, Taiwan's economy flourished in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹) and Taiwan became one of the Four Asian Tigers/Dragons. But once democracy was introduced in the 1990s, Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Today, Taiwan's economy is stagnate, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, and many Taiwan graduates are seeking employment opportunities in mainland China.
    1
  20298.  @AmbietsRato  Korea's history is complex indeed, but in my opinion, Korea shouldn't have to be partitioned into North Korea (by the Soviet Union) and South Korea (by the United States). This division by foreign powers is the root cause of the issue and while the Soviet Union has since dissolved in 1991 and its inheritor Russia is no longer interested in spreading communist ideology, the US is still actively spreading its. In my opinion, reunification of Korea should be left up to the Koreans themselves to decide, and this includes DPRK and ROK. The DPRK goal remains the same, it wants to reunify Korea into a single entity. However, the US military intervention is a form of interference in what should have been a Korean civil war. Imagine if say the American Civil War had some foreign power intervening and preventing one side from wiping out the other. America would probably be remain divided had such a scenario happened. Also, you said the UN "intervened to defend the south and to contain the spread of communism." but this isn't the case. Had this been the case, the US forces would push the North back to the 38th Parallel and remained there. But instead of stopping, the UN forces went beyond the 38th Parallel and into actual North Korean territory, right up to China's doorstep (You said: "The UN forces then crossed the 38th parallel and advanced toward the Yalu River, the border between the DPRK and China.")
    1
  20299.  @realsimonwest  "Shenzhou. What he means by that is that Americans are noy directly involved in our governments like the Russians were in the Soviet Union." Are you kidding? You're thinking the Americans are not involved in governments all over the world? Tell that to the hundreds of US military bases located all over the world.
    1
  20300.  @realsimonwest  The fact that Australia's government agreed to USA's request shows that it's policy is actually being dictated by the US. China is Australia's biggest trading partner, yet Australia is willing to antagonize the relation just to appease the US. It's astonishing how you just perceive it as America just having "natural allies that agree with the democracy bit." By that same token, I could also say that Russia has natural allies like Belarus that agree with it.
    1
  20301.  @realsimonwest  To understand the history of the conflicts along Russia's periphery, we need to understand Russian history. Putin has spoken about the concept of "Russkiy Mir" ("Russian world"), which is defined not by territory but by where the Russian people reside. During the Soviet Union, Russian people frequently travelled outside of Russia to work on various Soviet projects across the Soviet satellites, mostly in Ukraine. Much territory also changed hands within the USSR. For example, Crimea was historically part of Russia, before the Bolsheviks transferred Crimea to Ukraine in 1954, to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia. The abrupt collapse of the USSR in 1991 meant that many Russians suddenly found themselves trapped outside of their motherland. When Ukraine declared independence, the Russians living in Ukraine became Ukrainian citizens overnight. Just imagine if you leave your hometown to work in another part of the country and then suddenly, you became a foreign citizen overnight. When Ukraine became independent, Crimea also became a republic and held a referendum with the Crimean authorities pushing for more independence from Ukraine and closer links with Russia. However, the Republic of Crimea was forcibly abolished by Ukraine and made a part of Ukraine. In 2014 after Maidan uprising, Crimea held another referendum where the overwhelming majority (97%) voted to join the Russian Federation. Because of the concept of Russkiy Mir, Putin felt compelled to reincorporate Crimea back into Russia. As you can see, the history of Russia and its surrounding neighbors is very complex, and the USSR dissolution complicates it further.
    1
  20302.  @realsimonwest  To understand the history of the conflicts along Russia's periphery, we need to understand Russian history. Putin has spoken about the concept of "Russkiy Mir" ("Russian world"), which is defined not by territory but by where the Russian people reside. During the Soviet Union, Russian people frequently travelled outside of Russia to work on various Soviet projects across the Soviet satellites, mostly in Ukraine. Much territory also changed hands within the USSR. For example, Crimea was historically part of Russia, before the Bolsheviks transferred Crimea to Ukraine in 1954, to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia. The abrupt collapse of the USSR in 1991 meant that many Russians suddenly found themselves trapped outside of their motherland. When Ukraine declared independence, the Russians living in Ukraine became Ukrainian citizens overnight. Just imagine if you leave your hometown to work in another part of the country and then suddenly, you became a foreign citizen overnight. When Ukraine became independent, Crimea also became a republic and held a referendum with the Crimean authorities pushing for more independence from Ukraine and closer links with Russia. However, the Republic of Crimea was forcibly abolished by Ukraine and made a part of Ukraine. In 2014 after Maidan uprising, Crimea held another referendum where the overwhelming majority (97%) voted to join the Russian Federation. That's why Putin decide to annex Ukraine.
    1
  20303.  @realsimonwest  To understand the history of the conflicts along Russia's periphery, we need to understand Russian history. During the Soviet Union, Russian people frequently travelled outside of Russia to work on various Soviet projects across the Soviet satellites, mostly in Ukraine. Much territory also changed hands within the USSR. For example, Crimea was historically part of Russia, before the Bolsheviks transferred Crimea to Ukraine in 1954, to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia. The abrupt collapse of the USSR in 1991 meant that many Russians suddenly found themselves trapped outside of their motherland. The Russians living in Ukraine at that time became Ukrainian citizens overnight. Just imagine if you leave your hometown to work in another part of the country and then suddenly, you became a foreign citizen overnight. Crimea also became a republic and held a referendum with the Crimean authorities pushing for more independence from Ukraine and closer links with Russia. However, the Republic of Crimea was forcibly abolished by Ukraine and made a part of Ukraine. In 2014 after Maidan uprising, Crimea held another referendum where the overwhelming majority (97%) voted to join the Russian Federation. That's why Putin decide to bring Crimea back into Russia.
    1
  20304.  @realsimonwest  To understand the history of the conflicts along Russia's periphery, we need to understand Russian history. During the Soviet Union, Russian people frequently travelled outside of Russia to work on various Soviet projects across the Soviet satellites, mostly in Ukraine. Much territory also changed hands within the USSR. For example, Crimea was historically part of Russia, before the Bolsheviks transferred Crimea to Ukraine in 1954, to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia. The abrupt collapse of the USSR in 1991 meant that many Russians suddenly found themselves trapped outside of their motherland and the Russians living in Ukraine became Ukrainian citizens overnight. Just imagine if you leave your hometown to work in another part of the country and then suddenly, you became a foreign citizen overnight. In 2014 after Maidan uprising, Crimea held a referendum where the overwhelming majority (97%) voted to join the Russian Federation. That's why Putin decided to incorporate Crimea back into Russia.
    1
  20305.  @realsimonwest  Look, you first brought up Russia in Syria, but when it was shown that Assad government had requested that Russia involve itself military, you switched to saying Russia should be condemned when they are uninvited by the country's regional government. Yet when Assad government said that the US military presence in Syria is unwanted, you switched other conflicts.
    1
  20306.  @realsimonwest  Look, you're the one saying (and I quote your words) "Russia should be condemned where the country's regional government did not request Russia's presence" but when it tends out that Russia was invited to Syria, and it's actually the US military presence in Syria that is unwanted by their government, then why is it you refuse to condemn them? And you have the gall to accuse me of having rose-tinted glasses towards Russia, while you do exactly that towards the US?
    1
  20307.  @realsimonwest  It's astonishing how you accuse Russia of hypocrisy while you continue to ignore that of the US. Take the 2003 Iraq War for example, and back then the United Nations General Secretary, Kofi Annan said that the Iraq War was illegal and had violated UN charter. The United Nations secretary general, Kofi Annan, declared explicitly for the first time last night that the US-led war on Iraq was illegal. Mr Annan said that the invasion was not sanctioned by the UN security council or in accordance with the UN's founding charter. - The Guardian, Sep 2004 Yet there hasn't been any punishments meted out for the breaching of the UN charter.
    1
  20308.  @joaosito68  Yeah. No doubt about it from me. But it appears that others on this thread take a different view and are trying to justify the USA arming the Taliban with weapons paid for by American taxpayers.
    1
  20309.  @sonarbangla8711  Well said. The problem is that Mao's achievements are hardly known in the West, and many of them still harbor an overall negative view of PRC's founding father, even though he accomplished the herculean feat of reunifying a country as huge and vast as China itself. Such a feat brought peace to the war-torn country, so that China can finally start rebuilding, yet it is often overlooked.
    1
  20310. USA is actually the most protectionist country in the world, not China. USA has over 800 protectionist policies, compared to China's 200-300 of such policies.
    1
  20311.  @nathanremix5800  Then why Malaysia give away Singapore to British? According Singapore history, British explorer Stamford Raffles signed an agreement with Malay Sultan Tunku Abdul Rahman handing over Singapore to become British colony. And later, Singapore agreed to be part of Malaysia again so why did Malaysia not value this second opportunity? And just because British banned Malaysia from deporting Chinese immigrants back to China, means you can't immigrate more Malays to settle down in Singapore? Or perhaps migrate Singapore Chinese elsewhere to in Malaysia, to reduce their Chinese population size? There's so many steps Malaysia could have take, but you choose give up your "lands" and grant Singapore independence, then don't blame others for your folly.
    1
  20312. Pelosi's trip might have just woken up the people of Taiwan to the realization that going to war with the mainland is not in the island's best interests.
    1
  20313.  @raven2dove  "神州 Shenzhou And what make you think they weren't informed?" Taiwan's foreign ministry said it had no comment on reports of Pelosi’s travel plans. And like I said, Taiwan wasn't even on Pelosi's itinerary, so she was actually sneaking into Taiwan. And Taiwan is an island not an island nation, even Taiwan's own constitution says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to its constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  20314.  @ianbelanger7459  "神州 Shenzhou the reason the the number of protectionist measures is not a good indicator can be seen in a tariff on Norwegian sockeye compared to currency withdrawal limitations" How does that explain anything? The U.S still has the world's largest number of protectionist policies (according to Global Trade Alert) then how is China more protectionist than the US given that we have far fewer protectionist policies?
    1
  20315.  @ianbelanger7459  Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphone, computers, home appliances, electronics, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that the cost of living in USA is kept lower than it should be. Think about the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursuits like buying cars, luxury brands, housing, etc. Isn't that the reason why many Americans often flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money? Americans have clearly benefited from having access to Made-in-China goods.
    1
  20316.  @ianbelanger7459  While it's true that Chinese did not build those homes in the US, the fact that Americans can purchase affordable Made-in-China cell phone, computer, home appliances, clothing, sneakers, etc, means that money has been saved on this cost of living expenditure, which can then contribute towards the buying of a new house. Are American workers themselves willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers? If not, then Made-in-US goods will be pricier than Made-in-China goods, so Americans would not have saved money had they bought Made-in-US goods as compared to Made-in-China.
    1
  20317.  @ianbelanger7459  Skilled workers and college educated workers can find better jobs than manufacturing or local sales, so how are they affected? Are those American workers willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers? If not, then even had they remained in manufacturing, Made-in-America goods will be pricier than Made-in-China goods, and Americans would feel the pinch of the cost of living. "The end result is the average person can buy a phone, but can't afford healthcare, food or housing" Food is made cheaper thanks to Chinese food, who says that Americans can't afford food? In fact, studies have shown that there are more Chinese restaurants in the USA than all than McDonald's, Burger King's, Wendy's & KFC's combined. As for healthcare, that's part of the U.S jurisdiction, not China's. And again, buying all those affordable Made-in-China smartphones, computers, home appliances, electronics, helps save money so that Americans can buy houses.
    1
  20318.  @ianbelanger7459  Quick comment about the "loss of manufacturing jobs". If during a job interview, the company hiring decided to hire the candidate willing to work for lower pay, then how can the candidate with a higher pay complain about the job going to the lower wage worker? Yet they call it "stealing jobs"?
    1
  20319.  @ianbelanger7459  Skilled labor is the reason why American companies decided to set up shop in China and harness China's skilled labor pool. If skilled labor wasn't important, then why didn't US companies set up shop in, say India (world's 2nd largest economy) or Africa (also has a huge workforce)? Industries have been changed as a result of skill labor, this is undeniable. Chinese restaurants in America are founded by Chinese people isn't it? According to the Alliance for American Manufacturing, the U.S imports a lot of food from China. The United States continues to import food from China, including $4.6 billion worth in 2017 alone. Top imports include fruits and vegetables, snack foods, spices and tea. In 2019, for example, the U.S. imported $89 million worth of tea and $300 million worth of apple juice. - Alliance for American Manufacturing. Had American manufacturing remain in USA, then the prices of Made-in-America products will be higher than Made-in-China products, and would be very much out of reach of ordinary Americans. I mean, take cell phones for example. When the mobile phone first came out, it came with a high price tag (because of American labor). But Chinese labor has reduced the price of mobile phones, so much such that it becomes affordable to the masses. Another flaw in your thinking, you're saying that if production had remained in the US, then wages would have to rise. But once again, this would make the price of Made-in-America goods higher than Made-in-China goods, and therefore, the cost of living in America would increase if there was no access to affordable Made-in-China goods.
    1
  20320.  @ianbelanger7459  I've also never understood why you claim protection on the part of China, when the United States of America is the world's most protectionist country, having taken more than 800 protectionist measures since 2008 according to Global Trade Alert. How can China be more protectionist when we have far less protectionist measures than America?
    1
  20321.  @ianbelanger7459  I've added as much detail to my argument, supported by articles where possible. According to Global Trade Alert, the United States is the world's most protectionist country, taking far more protectionist measures than China. Chinese workers make daily products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, sneakers, clothing, etc, cheap so that Americans save money on living expenses thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Mind you, it's the everyday ordinary American that benefits from these affordable Made-in-China goods. Made-in-America goods is more expensive than Made-in-China goods. Even if you increase the wages of American workers, that's only going to make their products ever more costly, whereas if they save money if they purchase Made-in-China products.
    1
  20322.  @ianbelanger7459  I'm quite certain that a country that has taken more protectionist policies is certainly more protectionist than one that has far few protectionist policies. It sounds like you're unable to account for the fact that the U.S is the world's most protectionist country, so you try to come up with a red herring argument. The fact that Made-in-China goods are cheaper, means that even if American wages remain stagnant, they can still afford Made-in-China goods who will tend to be on the lower price range of products. As long as a product in the market remains cheaper than others, then money will inevitably be saved in order to spend on other expenditures.
    1
  20323.  @item6931  How did he destroy my arguments? He continues to defend the U.S protectionism when the United States is the world's more protectionist country according to Global Trade Alerts, having taken more than 800 protectionist measures. Surely the impact of such protectionism on its economy is far more than one country that has taken far fewer protectionist policies.
    1
  20324.  @item6931  How many times have you've repeated this? It seems like all you do is go around stalking my posts and then "feign agreement" with whoever takes a different view from mine, and claim that I'm posting on threat of punishment, then how well do you even know me? All this is just your own ad hominen fallacies against me.
    1
  20325. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  20326.  @item6931  What has which country I live in even got to do with this discussion? The fact remains that the United States is the world's most protectionist country according to Global Trade Alert, having taken more protectionist measures than even China. You can't refute this simple fact, so you just go on and on about me living in a dictatorship?
    1
  20327. Chinese scientists have found a method to convert sand to soil, using a blend of sand, water and a special kind of paste made from plant cellulose. Chinese researchers developed a paste made of plant cellulose, which helps retain water, nutrients and air. It's non-toxic, eco-friendly and affordable. Video: Chinese scientists find way to convert sand to soil youtu.be/idjegdl0L3Y After being treated with the technology, a 1.6+hectare sandy plot has been transformed into fertile land. The plants demand the same amount of water as those grown in regular soil, but require less fertilizer and bear higher yields.
    1
  20328. The most salient point is that Meng Wanzhou finally gets to come home after 3 long years, since her detention in Dec 2018. Huawei being fined and both sides "saving face" are secondary, compared to the primary objective of putting Meng on the first flight bound for China.
    1
  20329. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward to a bright future ahead. However, many Westerners (but not all) are increasing pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    1
  20330. The Uighurs in Xinjiang literally drive cotton-harvesting machines to harvest truckloads of cotton, yet Western MSM are calling it forced labour?
    1
  20331.  @fazole  "神州 Shenzhou Because China won't allow it, it bribes other countries to vote with China..." The votes were cast back in 1971 when China wasn't the economic power we are today. The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the UN General Assembly Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The poll results were as follows: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting ... Source: Wikipedia: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 Since PRC won the vote with two-thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971 and recognized the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" from the United Nations.
    1
  20332. You want India to fight a conventional war in Tibetan region? China can always deploy our very own domestically made combat UAVs like CaiHong-4 and Caihong-5 for both surveillance and combat operations and have often been compared with US Reaper drone. While Indian troops are struggling on difficult mountainous terrain, the PLA's combat drones are capable of firing air-to-ground missiles from altitude of 5,000 meters, therefore staying outside of effective range of most anti-aircraft guns.
    1
  20333. 0x0cd0 India can continue to be a graveyard if it wants to have conventional war. It will be India's own troops dying in the mountainous Tibet region, while China's combat UAVs do not result in the pilots death even if destroyed. More combat drones can always be manufactured too, to replace losses. China also has intermediate range ballistic missiles like DF-26 with a range of 3,000 to 4,000 km, that can literally fly over the Himalayas, so why India wants to fight in conventional warfare? Those missiles can engage enemies at safer distance far away from the battlefront.
    1
  20334. 0x0cd0 Wars are won because smart people can kill other people without themselves dying. It's India's choice if they want to sacrifice their troops to Chinese combat UAVs and DF missiles launched from thousands of kilometres away. Even if our drones and missiles are somehow shot down from the skies, they don't result in loss of our soldiers lives. But if they succeeded in killing Indian troops, then that's less people for the PLA ground forces to deal with eventually.
    1
  20335. Chinese have certain jokes regarding marital issues, such as consulting almanac for auspicious dates for marriage, the man addressing her as mother-in-law, preparing nuptial gifts, so it could be that it would be better if a Chinese played the African lady and acted like how a Chinese mother-in-law would normally act.
    1
  20336. Video: Facts tell: Hubei's three steps to recover from Covid-19 youtu.be/s80M55LUfLw?t=100 If you're the owner of a small business, the government will reduce your taxes and ensure your profits are maximised. The government will also actively help you resume production and recover to levels before the outbreak as soon as possible.
    1
  20337. China has the world's longest range ICBM, the DongFeng-41, with an operational range of 13,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the US LGM-30 Minuteman with its range of 13,000 km. Even the mountain range won't shield India, if Chinese missiles can literally fly over beyond the Himalayas.
    1
  20338. Just look at how high the attitude of the village location is on the mountain. You think its easy to transport food, running water, electricity and gas up there to their houses so that they can cook food?
    1
  20339.  Red Bull  Why isn't your comment showing up on my screen? What's going on here?
    1
  20340.  Charles Schmidd  Many Westerners refuse to wear masks, that's why Covid-19 cases spiralling out of control in Western democracies like USA, UK, France, even India.
    1
  20341.  @sabinereynaudsf  China is indeed very safe, even many expats in China have remarked how safe it is. Here's some videos examples: Video: Is China actually safe? youtu.be/JTtVR3w7VXo Video: How Safe is China Really??? youtu.be/J7TJOmqOmaE Video: Is China a Safe Country? youtu.be/exT3Z0-5fqc …… You said: "For many people around the world that is an uncomfortable degree of state power, it doesn't privacy rights," Facebook has leaked users data to the public (in fact it has a history of doing so) yet many people still use Facebook regardless of it's history of leaking user data. Source: After Data Breach Exposes 530 Million, Facebook Says It Will Not Notify Users npr.org/2021/04/09/986005820/after-data-breach-exposes-530-million-facebook-says-it-will-not-notify-users …… You said: "punishing people for minor deviations from expected norms seems excessive." What examples of minor deviations from expected norms that have been punished are you referring to?
    1
  20342.  @sabinereynaudsf  You said: "People not valuing privacy and trusting the government with that power, is a uniquely Chinese characteristic." Facebook has sold users data to governments, yet people continue using Facebook regardless. Even today, almost everyone has a camera phone and can take pictures of people in public, so what privacy are you talking about? Even many cars and vehicles have cameras that record data on the roads, what privacy is there in today's technologically advanced society?
    1
  20343.  @sabinereynaudsf  Didn't Wikileaks, Edward Snowden and Julian Assange expose the US government spying on it's citizens and monitoring their private conversations for keywords relating to terrorism? The American citizens have been under government surveillance since 9/11 times.
    1
  20344.  @sabinereynaudsf  The US government operates the largest and most advanced spying, surveillance, and data collection programs on the planet, made up of multiple law enforcement and intelligence agencies, some of which operate in secret. Aside from official government entities, third parties often comply with government requests for information. These include big tech companies like Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Facebook, all of which were shown by Edward Snowden to have cooperated with the NSA’s spying efforts. Source: What does the US government know about you? privacy.net/us-government-surveillance-spying-data-collection/ If what you are saying is true, then why don't Americans stop using Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Facebook?
    1
  20345.  @zilun  2045 is still some time away. Also, Chinese scientists from Tsinghua University have developed a fibre they say is so strong it could haul 160 elephants and even be used to build an elevator to space. Just 1 cubic centimetre of the carbon nanotube material won’t break under the weight of more than 800 tonnes, and that tiny piece of cable would weigh just 1.6 grams. China has strongest fibre that can haul 160 elephants – and a space elevator? Source: scmp(dot)com/news/china/society/article/2170193/china-has-strongest-fibre-can-haul-160-elephants-and-space And like I said, the U.S has literally no long-term strategy against China. Whereas China has made many plans into the future and have already embarked on the steps to achieve those goals.
    1
  20346.  @joeburns88  Trump will eventually have to step down after 4-8 years when his term is over. And China is very patient indeed, cause we hold the long term advantage.
    1
  20347.  @zilun  Over 50 years ago, nobody expected that 'communist' China would survive or become successful. When the Soviet Union collapsed, everyone thought China will soon follow. But China defied all expectations of failure and survived long after USSR dissolution, transforming from dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, into an economic juggernaut, the world's factory ('Made in China') protected by world's largest land army and China today has strong global presence as well as being influential player of world politics. You made that claim "Over long term, there's no possibility of U.S. dumping its constitution to adopt authoritarian system." but history says otherwise. After all, the Republic of Rome (similar system as USA) eventually fell to barbarians and fragmented into Britain, France, Germany, Spain, Egypt, Turkey, etc, and during the Dark Ages of Europe, many of those states took up monarchy which is an authoritarian system. So how can you be so sure that there's no possibility of U.S. dumping its constitution to adopt authoritarian system? History has shown otherwise.
    1
  20348.  @joeburns88  Trump will eventually step down as president isn't it? I thought Americans abhor dictatorships, so there's no way America can make any coherent long-term strategy against China spanning 10 years or more, given that US presidents have 4-8 years term limits. I mean where does America see itself in 10 years time? How about 20 years into the future? China is patiently waiting for Trump to step down, so that we can reestablish better trade relations with the next US president. Trump's tariffs are extremely unpopular among American companies and farmers, so the US president might just reverse Trump's policies and lift the trade war. Who knows?
    1
  20349.  @joeburns88  Trump's tariffs are extremely unpopular among the American companies and farmers, so again, what makes you think that the trade war will continue? Do you have magical power to predict the future?
    1
  20350.  @zilun  Those potential candidates can run, but it does not necessarily mean that they will win. Your country's entire political system is based on chance and probability, while China's is base on certainty and long-term plans (which I have highlighted previously) and you think China can't hit back at the USA with tariffs of our own? China controls 90% of the world's rare earth production, which are essential materials for wide variety of technologies like chips, batteries, solar cells, etc.
    1
  20351.  @zilun  Republic of Rome was eventually replaced by monarchy in Britain, France, Germany, etc, so isn't it clear that 'democracy' was eventually replaced by 'authoritianism' here? And if you claimed that it was by invasion, then who knows, maybe USA might be invaded and have their constition replaced in the future. It happened to Republic of Rome, then why not the USA?
    1
  20352.  @joeburns88  Corruption is universal phenomena, even USA suffer from corruption. Hilary Clinton for example is corrupt politician and didn't Trump promised to jail Hilary Clinton if he became president? Why has no action been taken against her so far? At least in China, under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-corruption campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption within the party. and since 2012, over 100 officials of provincial-ministerial level and above have been implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China. Source: Wikipedia: Officials implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China (2012–2017) But when is the last time a country like USA had an anti-corruption crackdown of is own?
    1
  20353.  @joeburns88  What is USA doing about its corruption? Didn't Donald Trump promise to reveal his tax details if he ever became president? Then why hasn't he done so, so long after he took office? At least there are ongoing anti-corruption campaigns in China dealing with corruption, and as the years pass, after 10-20 years, corruptions levels in the CCP will most likely be lesser than what they are today. Like I said, you only focus short-term, because of US president term limits, but USA clearly has no long-term strategy against China, like I have been elaborating previously. Therefore, why mock China's system when it is superior? Not every country have to follow Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  20354.  @じゃみっと  What has my race got to do with this?
    1
  20355. Chinese civilization is one of world's oldest "continous" civilization and the last of the 4 Great Ancient Civilizations (others being Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt) still alive today. Western believe in democracy, but even "democratic" Roman empire did not last, and fell to barbarians when democracy tore the empire apart. But Chinese civilization still present today through passage of time, whereas the other civilizations have faded to historical textbooks.
    1
  20356. 西方媒体太傲慢～终有一天他们体制一定会失败。
    1
  20357. Russia has yet to call upon the services of their most invincible soldier, General Frost, to pay Western Europe a visit during Winter, by then which victory for Russia is certainly guaranteed.
    1
  20358.  @suppeeps5393  So you think the U.S can count on this "non-publicly known" oil reserves to contain Russia and China?
    1
  20359.  @ivanThaOoze  I've heard "China is collapsing" for 30 years already, and yet it still hasn't happened.
    1
  20360.  @suppeeps5393  The footage tanks in front of banks has been debunked as having been captured in Rizhao, not at the Henan bank protests, and ot turns out that the tanks were part of a military exercise in Rizhao. The bright yellow lights of a hotel can be seen in the background of the video. They match the nighttime appearance of the Ji Hotel, also known as the Hanting Hotel Rizhao Railways Station, in Rizhao. Rizhao is more than 300 miles away from Henan.
    1
  20361.  @waynerukonhi5706  China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, compared what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway ... Source: YouTube: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China By building infrastructure, China is actually bringing tangible benefits to Africans instead of just providing money that would otherwise disappear down some African politicians pockets. I also find it strange that you accuse China of "world dominance" and your example is China's claim over the South China Sea which is in China's own front pouch. How is that akin to world dominance?
    1
  20362.  @gabrielmataleo4573  About establishing a HK army, where will Hong Kong obtain its tanks, fighter jets and ships? Singapore purchased its military hardware from USA (and Malaysia doesn't mind) but I highly doubt mainland China will tolerate Hong Kong purchasing weapons from USA. And if Hong Kong buys weapons from mainland China, it will be at susceptible to mainland influence all the same, so getting weapons is another factor to consider here.
    1
  20363.  @gabrielmataleo4573  Just because you can criticize your government, doesn't necessarily mean Hong Kong will get better with criticism. Hong Kong needs solutions to its problems, not more criticism of its policies. How do you expect to get things done if all Hong Kong people do is protest and protest? In Singapore, protest is forbidden so that's why Singapore government can concentrate on plans to develop Singapore. Take mainland China for example, China has pollution problems because of over reliance on coal power, so China built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation the Three Gorges Dam, to supply China with green energy to power our growth. But during the construction, there were many opposition to the project by environmentalists, ecologists, archaeologists, villagers need relocation, etc, but because Chinese government can just bulldoze the opposition and push ahead with the project. Had China been a democracy, it would be bogged down with delays, lobbyists, protestors, and it might even be cancelled. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtube.com/watch?v=b8cCsUBYSkw
    1
  20364.  @gabrielmataleo4573  So Hong Konger doesn't like to walk under the sun in Hong Kong's hot climate? Then what about Singapore then, which is hot all year round? Like I said earlier, if everyone is only complaining, then who's the one coming up with solutions? Hong Kong government urgently needs solutions and answers to Hong Kong's woes, but if all the people do is protest and complain, then who's going to fix those problems? China has many problems too, but at least the government is working to fix them. China was once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past and while Chinese government is not perfect (then again, which government body is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates plummeted. This graph shows life expectancies across China, India, Europe and USA Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm So it shows that the government is fixing problems, so isn't that what Hong Kong government needs? Solutions, not more complaints?
    1
  20365.  @gabrielmataleo4573  Did you actually read the HK extradition bill? The HK government says the original version has been amended to protect human rights and ensure suspects receive a fair hearing and aren’t extradited for political offenses. Source: washingtonpost.com/business/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-extradition-bill-rocking-hong-kong/2019/06/11/12a7907c-8c26-11e9-b6f4-033356502dce So what are the Hong Kong people protesting about then?
    1
  20366.  @gabrielmataleo4573  "China have a consistent record in Hong Kong history of making fake record in order to extradite political opponents. ( information is available in some Hong Kong textbook)" Why don't you show the Hong Kong textbook then? Under current HK extradition laws, mainland China is unable to extradite people from Hong Kong (that's why this bill is being passed by HK) so where is your evidence of mainland making fake record? Taiwan Government have already shown great objection to this bill, but that does not mean Hong Kong cannot choose to push ahead with the extradition bill isn't it? Hong Kong government is not the Taiwan government, so why bring Taiwan into this issue? I do understand that it all started because some Hong Konger flew to Taiwan with his pregnant girlfriend and murdered her and gruesomely stuff her body into suitcase in Taiwan, while he flew back to Hong Kong. The Hong Kong government only wants to cover up this loophole that exists in its extradition treaty that's all.
    1
  20367. First thing is for Thailand is to recognize that they are under attack by the USA. Can't begin fixing a problem if they don't recognize there's a problem in the first place.
    1
  20368. attackmaster555 How was Korean war a slight victory? Korea is still divided today isn't it? Even with the well equipped and highly trained armies of 16 nations, the Allies did not win the Korean War, despite facing off against poorly trained PLA soldiers, our crappy equipment, and with only North Korea for allies. The PLA today is not the same as it was back then. China has world's longest range ICBM, the DF-41, with operational range of 13,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the US LGM-30 Minuteman with its range of 13,000 km. How do you expect the mountain range to protect India, if Chinese missiles can literally fly over beyond the Himalayas?
    1
  20369.  @MANI40499  India can claim Goa, Tripura, Manipur, Sikkim, Nagaland, Jammu & Kashmir as part of India, then why can't China claim Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria as part of our country? Why the biased double standards?
    1
  20370.  @ponnusamymuthaya6084  Why resort to hurling personal insults against me for my views, just because my views happen to differ from yours? Why not attempt to attack my points instead of attacking me personally?
    1
  20371.  @ponnusamymuthaya6084  Granted, the Communist Party of China is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  20372.  @JohnBobb  What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your lands and spending money on your economies. Your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students studying the same topic as their peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, ZTE, LENOVO, etc are expanding overseas and Chinese investors are buying up real estate in your countries. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 China now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? That China is locked up like North Korea? Chinese people can be virtually found all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all. Go to your neighborhood and how many Chinese nationals can you find in your country? Or go to your local university and ask your local students how they feel about the "Chinese competition." I mean, when is the last time you stepped out and took a good look around?
    1
  20373.  @JohnBobb  China's "ghost cities" are being filled up as millions migrate from the rural countryside to the urban centers to find work. For example, in 2011, London’s Daily Mail reported that the Zhengzhou New Area was China’s largest “Ghost City.” But today, the city has a population of 10,120,000 inhabitants, and had a GDP of 1,014 billion(RMB) in 2018. Don't believe me? Here is beautiful video of Zhengzhou: youtube.com/watch?v=jFdLkgDS-QE&t=8 (Suggestion: Watch the above video in HD Fullscreen for the best experience) This just means that time is needed for immigrants to migrate into our "ghost cities" to fill them up that's all.
    1
  20374.  @JohnBobb  Beijing is our cultural center, home to The Great Wall of China, The Forbidden City, Summer Palace, and many cultural monuments (yet you claim CCP destroyed our culture?) as well as modern buildings like CCTV Headquarters, National Performing Arts center (The Egg), Galaxy SOHO and so on. Have you been to Beijing yourself? Here is short 4 min clip of Beijing: youtube.com/watch?v=-UuJxmU6OCQ (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience) So what makes you think Chinese culture is destroyed, or that people in China lack freedoms? Look at the amount of tourists in China, visiting our historical monuments and making videos about how China is rapidly changing.
    1
  20375.  @JohnBobb  Shanghai has grown to become global financial center and transport hub, with the world's busiest container port. renowned for its Lujiazui skyline, and museums and historic buildings, such as those along The Bund, as well as the City God Temple and the Yu Garden. Modern Shanghai resembles a futuristic city and here is a 3-min aerial view of Beautiful Shanghai: youtube.com/watch?v=1cC-j4_NtvE&t=6 (Suggestion: Watch in HD fullscreen for the best experience)
    1
  20376.  @JohnBobb  Since China is very successful under authoritarian CCP leadership, then why should China change to democracy then? Hong Kong and Taiwan were similarly successful under authoritarian British Rule and single-party KMT rule, respectively, and today their economies are stagnating under democracy, so why should mainland China follow their example? Because Westerners says so? Why involved ordinary people in important political decisions regarding the country's future? Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (e.g. they fail to turn up to vote) or they may make decisions based on emotions not logic (e.g. British people don't like immigrants so they vote for Britain to leave the EU) or they may simply lack political awareness in order to make informed decisions, and they might also be susceptible to foreign influences. That's how Hitler was able to come to power by preying on German people's resentment towards the humiliating Treaty of Versailles and promising to make German great again (which admittedly he did). Similarly, that's how Donald Trump was able to become president by preying on gullible Americans resentment towards China, with false promises of making America great again. Already, having 300 million Americans vote in the US elections has torn the country apart politically and the divide between the Left and Right has never been wider than it is today. Can you imagine the same thing happening, but this time with a country with 4 times the population of USA? China's 1.4 billion people would probably fracture under democracy and split apart.
    1
  20377.  @akif5638  Since when does China ban YouTube? Nobody will come arrest you for logging on to YouTube while in China.
    1
  20378.  @akif5638  I wrote Amos Yee but my autocorrect somehow changed it to Amos Lee, since Lee is more common surname than Yee. And where is your source showing Yee was supporter of pedophilia? Even Islam traditionally supports pedophilia and does not forbid it, and there are verses in the Koran that your prophet practiced pedophilia. Prophet Muhammad married Aisha when she was six, and had sexual intercourse with her while she still remained pre-pubescent at the age of nine lunar years. This fact has been recorded many times in Sahih ahadith. Source: Pedophilia in the Qur'an wikiislam.net/wiki/Pedophilia_in_the_Qur%27an The difference between you and me is that at least I cite evidence to support my points where possible. But you have shown no evidence to suggest your claim that Amos Yee supports pedophilia. And my source is from USA showing how Singapore government is using his anti Christian views as an excuse to persecute him for being a Singapore dissident. From my previous source: "The evidence presented at the hearing demonstrates that Singapore’s prosecution of Yee was a pretext to silence his political opinions critical of the Singapore government. His prosecution, detention and general maltreatment at the hands of the Singapore authorities demonstrates persecution on account of Yee’s political opinions. Yee is a young political dissident and his application for asylum is granted.” – The Honourable Samuel Cole, immigration judge. I have literally shown that Singapore does not have free speech (just like China) But you people claim to be from Singapore, yet you claimed that you can criticise your government, when all available evidence shows you might get arrested for doing so?
    1
  20379.  @akif5638  Indeed, Singapore has enjoyed immerse prosperity under PAP authoritian rule. So why waste money and time to on democracy? Why spend so much resources on elections polling the ordinary people in Singapore? You'll still choose PAP anyway so why bother? At least Singapore has smaller population than China, so you'll spend less money, but can you imagine China, the world's most populous country, spending all that time, money and effort to get our 1.4 billion population to vote? Why go through all that, when CCP is doing a great job governing China? Like you loving your country, I love my country too. China was a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but under CCP leadership, China has transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it has been achieved by authoritian single party CCP leadership. So why can't I make comparison to Singapore single party PAP rule?
    1
  20380.  @JohnBobb  What makes you think Chinese culture is destroyed? Chinese people today still celebrate Chinese festivals like Spring Festival (Chinese New Year), Lantern Festival, Qingming (grave-sweeping) Festival, Dragon Boat Festival, Double Seventh (Chinese Valentime's Day) Festival, Mid-Autumn Festival, and so on. The Chinese New Year migration (in which we make the journey back to our home province in China) is considered the world's largest annual human migration, surpassing even the Western Christmas migration in terms of the sheer volume of traffic. Source: Forbes: Chinese New Year: The World's Largest Human Migration Is About To Begin forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2018/02/14/chinese-new-year-the-worlds-largest-human-migration-is-about-to-begin-infographic/ So why do you claim Chinese culture is destroyed, when Chinese New Year is world's largest annual human migration, surpassing even Western festivals?
    1
  20381.  @JohnBobb  So because Chinese government denies a couple of Canadians entry into China because of political reasons, suddenly means China is not free? If the Chinese government deems you a political threat to China, then why can't our government deny you entry? According to World Tourism Rankings, China is world's 4th most visited country after France, Spain and the United States, seeing some 60.7 million visitors in 2017 1. France (86.9 million) 2. Spain (81.8 million) 3. United States (76.9 million) 4. China (60.7 million) 5. Italy (58.3 million) 6. Mexico (39.3 million) Source: World Tourism rankings wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings China is also the most visited Asian country, surpassing even Japan, Korea, Thailand, India, in number of visitors. So just because of few politically sensitive Canadians get denied entry into China, suddenly means China is not free? Every country have their own immigration laws and its not as though Chinese have been denied access into Canada for political reasons as well. Look at Canadian authorities arresting Huawei CFO (and the CEO's daughter) Meng Wanzhou, even though Meng did not break any Canadian laws while on Canadian soil.
    1
  20382.  @JohnBobb  Chinese students study in the West, because China has world's largest population so it's a possibility that not enough schools, not enough jobs, not enough resources for everyone in China. With such high student population, competition for top schools and higher education is fierce and intense here in China. Some students don't qualify for local university, so they may choose to study abroad (especially if their parents have $$$). If your Western universities choose not to accept school fees, then its their loss. That's why your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, competing with your local students in exams, for university places and even job offers when they graduate. If they can't find job in your country, they are always welcome to come back to China (thus, saving China the resources needed to train this student to university degree) as well as bringing in foreign knowledge and technology to our shores. If they do get a job in your country, then they are depriving a local graduate of a job themselves, and if they rise to high position in corporate or government sector, they may get approached by CCP and possibly recruited as a spy in your country. Anti-Chinese sentiment in the West is also pushing some Chinese graduates to return to China, resulting in a sort of "reverse brain drain" Whichever way you look at it, China wins.
    1
  20383.  @JohnBobb  "神州 Shenzhou Youtube keeps deleting what i wrote" There you have it, YouTube actually has censorship of its own (sometimes, I can't post hyperlinks in certain forums) so what makes you think YT is free then? If you write certain sensitive posts on Chinese social media like Weibo or WeChat, then depending on the severity, your post might get taken down. But does that mean Chinese people can't talk normally or visit other countries and share different views? You said: "Do you like your family? Would you like them to be free, or in jail? Simple question, easy answer." Of course I love my family. And what's the meaning of your point about jail? By all accounts, it is America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and its prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that US government sometimes release the inmates back on the streets in order to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate So statistically speaking, aren't American families more likely to have a member serving jail time, than Chinese? So what exactly do you mean by "Would you like them to be free, or in jail?" Imprisonment is imprisonment for offending the law, whichever part of the world you are from, and America has the largest prison populations isn't it?
    1
  20384.  @JohnBobb  said "This is a hard topic, but why did you decide that China can only be successful if it's not democratic? Is a dog happy? It used to be a wolf once..." China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today. China has always been under authoritarian rule (and we still are today) under the rule of emperors, so why should China adopt Western democracy then? Look at India, world's largest democracy and what makes you think that India is better off under democracy? Actually India enjoys several intrinsic advantages over China. -India is word's 2nd most populous country, so its has comparable workforce to China's -Many Indians speak English (more favorable for Westerners) while Chinese still struggle with English today. -India is founding member of World Trade Organization in 1995, while China had a late entry in 2001 -India has better location, in between the East and the West, while China is in the Far East. -Southern India has more shoreline (more favorable for ports) than Eastern China's shoreline -India is democratic, China isn't. Yet despite these advantages, China has long overtaken India in several areas. -China is world's 2nd largest economy, India is world's 7th. -China has world's 2nd highest military spending, India has world's 5th. -China has world's 2nd highest research spending, while India is 6th. -China has literacy rate of 96.4%, India has literacy rate of 72.1%. -China has Global Hunger Index of 7.5(low) whereas India's is 31.4(serious) -China is world's 3rd largest arms exporter. India is world's largest arms importer. So what makes you think China should adopt Western democracy then? Look at India and it has literacy rate of 72.1%, which means over 25% of Indians are illiterate. Yet because of democracy, these illiterate Indians are allowed to vote in political decisions regarding the country's future? 1 in 4 people in India hasn't even attended school, so why allow them to vote in India's elections then? China is returning back to our status as a "wolf" through our means, while India is remaining a "dog" of the West because Britain forced democracy onto their colonies.
    1
  20385.  @akif5638  You claim Amos Yee supports pedophilia, then what about the Koran supporting pedophilia and child marriage then? Why can't Chinese government ban the extremist elements in Islamic teachings you tell me? If you really come from Singapore, then why is Singapore so much more advanced than its Islamic neighbors like Malaysia and Indonesia? It's because the Chinese people in Singapore work hard to make Singapore surpass its neighbors that's what. Singapore has a sizable Chinese population and thanks to their diligence and intelligence, Singapore flourished, under authoritarian PAP rule for over 50 years. Singapore’s political environment is stifling and its citizens face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. So how is Singapore political system any different from China? Amos Yee is not the only politicial dissident in Singapore, even Singapore Activist Seelan Palay was arrested after presenting a performance on Sunday afternoon at Hong Lim Park, “32 Years: The Interrogation of a Mirror” in commemoration of the 32 years of detention without trial that former Elected Member of Parliament, Chia Thye Poh went through. Source: Activist arrested by Police outside of Parliament House after standing alone with artpiece theonlinecitizen.com/2017/10/01/activist-arrested-by-police-outside-of-parliament-house-after-standing-alone-with-artpiece/
    1
  20386.  @cchannel7857  Cyrus has stated in his email that he's been very busy lately. It's not uncommon among business practices for payment details to be worked out at a later date after the initial business proposal, so what exactly are you trying to say? The end goal is that Cyrus declined payment in the end.
    1
  20387. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20388. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20389. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  20390. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  20391. Alexander Mercouris has stated many times that he is not a military expert, and that there's no way to corroborate the actual conditions on ground, but his assessment is based on sources that he fundamentally trust, whereas the Western MSM is taking info from the Ukrainian military's side.
    1
  20392. Meanwhile, the U.S can continue printing dollars with impunity, without pegging it to gold or silver.
    1
  20393. But the U.S dollar isn't even pegged to gold or silver. Yet USA is printing more of it.
    1
  20394. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20395.  @Karakulak1071  Multipolarity means the world is dominated by multiple voices. Unipolarity means a single voice (namely that of the USA) continues to dominate. Through multipolarity, Russia and China are demonstrating that there are voices that speak out.
    1
  20396.  @Joe-pc3hs  As of 2015, China has 40,000 mosques, the highest number in the world. 1st place: Xinjiang, Muslim population 13.4 million, and over 24,000 mosques. 2nd place: Ningxia, Muslim population 2.5 million and over 4,000 mosques. 3rd place: Gansu, Muslim population 1.37 million and over 2,500 mosques. 4th place: Qinghai, Muslim population 1.15 million and over 930 mosques. 5th place: Yunnan, Muslim population 1.09 million and over 820 mosques. 6th Henan, Muslim population 1.02 million and more than 620 mosques. 7th place: Hebei, Muslim population 600,000, 578 mosques. 8th place: Shandong, Muslim population 540,000 and 506 mosques. 9th: An Hui, Muslim population 330,000, 121 mosques. 10th place: Liaoning, Muslim population 310,000, 119 mosques. Compare this to the five Central Asian countries bordering the Xinjiang region, with a total population of over 78 million and some 38.5 million followers of Islam. Xinjiang has a total population of 24 million and a total population of more than 10 million believers in Islam. There are four times more Muslims in the five Central Asian countries than in Xinjiang, but there are nearly five times more mosques in Xinjiang than in the five Central Asian countries. Xinjiang also has far more mosques than traditional Islamic countries such as Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt and Iran. Iran has about 60 million Muslims and 5,400 mosques; Egypt has about 43 million Muslims and 17,000 mosques; Tunisia has about 7 million Muslims and only 650 mosques. The United States has 7-9 million Muslims yet the number of mosques in the United States is less than one-tenth of that in Xinjiang.
    1
  20397. China welcome Westerners warmly as visitors to the our lands (just ask those expats to China) but sadly, Westerners are treating Chinese as enemies in their lands.
    1
  20398. If India threaten to divide China, then likewise China will divide India from North East India by cutting through Siliguri Corridor.
    1
  20399. @Patrick Henry Who is moving onto who's territory? The USA is sending warships and aircraft carrier strike groups across the Pacific Ocean to threaten our waters like in Paracel Islands, so who is the invader here? Chinese people don't want war, but that doesn't mean we are weak. We will find to defend our sovereignty and protect our homes and loved ones from the invaders halfway across the globe!
    1
  20400. When will Western media learn to respect Chinese athlete's privacy?
    1
  20401.  @MrPurge11  "神州 Shenzhou No, it is more like the CCP is intimidating Peng to be quiet and make those sexual allegations go away," What sexual allegations? Peng Shuai has said in an email to WTA that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    1
  20402.  @alishanightshade3270  Which country are you from?
    1
  20403.  @MrPurge11  I read the translation of Peng Shuai's post on Reddit, and it's clear that she has had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, but where are the allegations of sexual assault? Given such an embarassing post, Peng Shuai would want to avoid the public eye for a while and keep a low profile, but it appears that Western MSM are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see.
    1
  20404.  @alishanightshade3270  "神州 Shenzhou I prefer places. Not country~~" Which place are you from then? Why are you telling me "神州 Shenzhou Ya, I'm a western and born in Asia lol" for?
    1
  20405.  @MrPurge11  "神州 Shenzhou No, thats just the CCP trying to twist her allegations, I bet Peng knows a lot of corruption that goes on at the CCP besides their sexual deviancy. I posted her allegations earlier," And I asked you Where are the allegations of sexual assault in her post? How is it the CPC trying to twist her allegations when there are clearly no allegations of sexual assault in her post?
    1
  20406.  @MrPurge11  But in this scenario there aren't any allegations of sexual assault in Peng Shuai's post (translated on Reddit) then why should there be an investigation when there is no crime being accused? Peng Shuai has appeared on IOC video call clearly expressing her desire for privacy, but Western media would have none of that and they are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private affairs to the world.
    1
  20407.  @MrPurge11  "神州 Shenzhou Yes there is allegations of sexual misconduct from a senior CCP official who should know better." Where are the allegations? I read the translation of Peng Shuai's post on Reddit and she had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man for several years, but where is the allegation of sexual assault in her post? Peng Shuai has appeared on IOC video and expressed her desire to personal privacy, yet why is it other countries media don't want to respect her wish for privacy and are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private affairs to the world?
    1
  20408.  @MrPurge11  So you aren't interested in highlighting the actual alleged sexual allegation by Peng Shuai, as long as you have the opportunity to malign China that's all. As for the Beijing Olympics, the IOC has made a video call with Peng Shuai and she has expressed her desire for privacy, so what makes you think the Olympics won't do well?
    1
  20409.  @MrPurge11  If everyone is interested in her safety then Peng Shuai has clearly appeared on IOC video call, expressing her desire for privacy then why is it other countries media demand that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see? Because they don't care about Peng Shuai, they want to use her as a opportunity to malign China that's all.
    1
  20410.  @MrPurge11  You claim the "IoC is complicit" then don't you think WTA is clearly politicizing this issue in order to malign China? Peng Shuai has appeared on video call, and she has sent a email to WTA claiming that the sexual assault allegations are false, and then who is the WTA to demand independent investigation of sexual allegations? This is clearly Peng Shuai's private affair, so why don't WTA respect her wish for privacy?
    1
  20411.  @MrPurge11  "神州 Shenzhou if there is anyone claiming sexual abuse, its Peng Shuai and she has a right for her case to be independently investigated." So I keep asking you where's the allegations of sexual assault? I read Peng Shuai's post on Reddit and could you point me where is the allegations of sexual assault in her post? You can't even establish a basis then how does this even warrant an investigation into the matter? "I don't claim IoC is complicit, it is clearly known that the WTA is complicit otherwise the WTA would not have suspended tournaments in China." The WTA could have suspended the tournaments because it's trying to politicise the issue. Why is it that you're claiming IOC is complicit but blindly believe that WTA is justified in suspending tournaments in China?
    1
  20412.  @MrPurge11  "神州 Shenzhou Why are you reading Peng Shuai's post off reddit, you should read it off Weibo, Don't know why it was removed." So I take it that you read Peng Shuai's post on Weibo? Where does it say that she was sexually assaulted?
    1
  20413. USA and EU politicians like to talk about "tackling climate change" by encouraging EV use. Yet when China makes EVs that are affordable to the masses, the West slaps tariffs on Chinese EVs.
    1
  20414. @comment sense Then why aren't you bothered by Western chefs boiling lobsters alive? It just appears like you're "virtue-signalling" to make up for the fact that you can't refute my points.
    1
  20415.  @ChiefCabioch  "神州 Shenzhou you accuse America of Imperialism, that's a perfect example of what the Chinese are currently doing" Did I ever accuse America of Imperialism here in this thread? Could you quote me my words here in this thread saying that America is conducting Imperialism?
    1
  20416.  Meng WAZOO CRIMINAL  Tell that to Julian Assange.
    1
  20417.  @ChiefCabioch  "神州 Shenzhou not necessarily in this thread" Then why are you posting on this thread accusing me of accusing America of Imperialism, when I never said that? Post your reply on a thread where I actually said that then!
    1
  20418.  @ChiefCabioch  I'm on a phone too, you can use the find on page function to search for words. I did exactly that and where did I ever accused America of Imperialism here in this thread?
    1
  20419. @comment sense China is officially atheist under the Communist Party of China, then can't China promote atheism within our lands? Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia and Turkiye (Turkey) can promote Islam in their lands, just like Christian countries can promote Christianity in their countries, then can't an atheist country promote atheism in our lands? Imagine the possibilities in an atheist country, with more focus on scientific reasoning, and less focus on religion.
    1
  20420. @comment sense About human talent, as the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses
    1
  20421. @comment sense Why don't you sympathise with the lobster that's being boiled alive by Western chefs? Or the pig that has to get slaughtered to feed Westerners? If a country regards animals as livestock, then who are you to tell others to conform to your country's food culture?
    1
  20422. @comment sense About human talent, China's universities train the most STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) out of any other in the world. Here's a list of countries with the most number of STEM graduates according to World Economic Forum. Countries With The Most STEM Graduates 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates This implies that China is going to play a much larger role in the STEM fields, given the sheer number of graduates produced in these fields.
    1
  20423. @comment sense But you're talking about human talent, and I've already shown that China's universities train more STEM graduates than any other in the world, yet you can't refute my point? As for GDP per capita, I've already explained that China has to host the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people, so on a per capita basis, if you divide our GDP by our enormous population, then of course you will arrive at a lower GDP per capita. Didn't you read my explanation earlier?
    1
  20424. @comment sense Why don't you sympathise with the lobster that's being boiled alive by Western chefs?
    1
  20425. @comment sense We were clearly talking about "human talent" (those are your own words) and I've shown that China's universities train more STEM graduates than any other, yet you suddenly change the topic to "net income"? Because you cannot refute my point about "human talent"? About China's education system, China has also been a top destination for international students and as of 2013, China was the most popular country in Asia for international students and ranked third overall among countries. China is now the leading destination globally for Anglophone African students and is host of the second largest international students population in the world.
    1
  20426. @comment sense Isn't the lobster also a creation of God? Yet you have no qualms about lobsters being boiled alive by Western chefs.
    1
  20427. @comment sense About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA. The test is given every three years to 15-year-olds around the world and measures their knowledge in reading, science and mathematics. PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment
    1
  20428. @comment sense Lobsters are animals too and God's creation according to you, yet you don't even sympathise with lobsters getting boiled alive by Western chefs.
    1
  20429. @comment sense China publishes more research papers than any other in the world, over a wide range of topics such as physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences. Countries by published scientific papers in 2018: 1. China (528,263 articles) 2. United States (422,808 articles) 3. India (135,788 articles) 4. Germany (104,396 articles) 5. Japan (98,793 articles) 6. United Kingdom (97,681 articles) 7. Russia (81,579 8. Italy (71,240 articles) 9. South Korea (66,376 articles) ... Source: List of countries by number of scientific and technical journal articles This shows that many Chinese scientist and researchers are making discoveries and publishing their findings, contributing to mankind's scientific advancements.
    1
  20430. @comment sense Pigs have been shown to be more intelligent than dogs, yet why don't you sympathise with them? And the Hindus worships the cow as sacred, yet they don't go imposing their beliefs to people who consume beef, so what gives you the right to impose yours on others?
    1
  20431. @comment sense Or even Rabbits are cute and beloved as pets by many people, yet the British have rabbit stew recipes, yet why aren't you complaining about them? You're just imposing your culinary culture onto all Chinese people that's all. You even claim "The people in China lack empathy" yet you don't complain about how food animals are treated in the West?
    1
  20432. @comment sense "This world = competition, just like Gaokao," So I take it you're unable to furnish facts about America's "human talents" to refute my claims of China having the most STEM graduates, the best PISA scores, and publishing more research papers than any other in the world?
    1
  20433. ​@comment sense "This is just my personal opinion, China should allow all religions." China has nearly 200 million religious believers and more than 380,000 clerical personnel. The five major religions practiced in China are Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism, and Protestantism. There are around 222,000 Buddhist clerical personnel and over 40,000 Taoist clerical personnel. Muslims make up 20 million, with about 57,000 clerical personnel. Catholicism and Protestantism have 6 million and 38 million followers in China, respectively, with 8,000 and 57,000 clerical personnel. There are approximately 5,500 religious groups in China, including seven national organizations which are Buddhist Association of China, Chinese Taoist Association, China Islamic Association, Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association, Bishops’ Conference of Catholic Church in China, National Committee of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement of the Protestant Churches in China, and China Christian Council. At present, there are about 144,000 places of worship registered for religious activities in China, among which are 33,500 Buddhist temples (including 28,000 Han Buddhist temples, 3,800 Tibetan Buddhist lamaseries, and 1,700 Theravada Buddhist temples), 9,000 Taoist temples, 35,000 Islamic mosques, 6,000 Catholic churches and places of assembly spread across 98 dioceses, and 60,000 Protestant churches and places of assembly. Source: China’s Policies and Practices on Protecting Freedom of Religious Belief
    1
  20434. @comment sense China is building a base foundation of research paper publications, in which to slowly increase the quality of research. China already has the world's 2nd largest R&D spending just after the U.S. List of countries by research and development spending 1. United States ($612.714 billion) 2. China ($514.798 billion) 3. Japan ($172.614 billion) 4. India ($158.691 billion) 5. Germany ($131.932 billion) 6. South Korea ($100.055 billion) 8. United Kingdom ($51.702 billion) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by research and development spending
    1
  20435. @comment sense What do you mean rabbits, pigs and cattle do not display love? They are mammals that suckle their young and nurture them (didn't you learn this at school?) yet you're just dismissing their ability to display love and regarding them as food items? Then you're not better than people who boil lobsters alive isn't it?
    1
  20436. @comment sense What do you mean rabbits, pigs and cattle do not display love? They are mammals that suckle their young and nurture them (didn't you learn this at school?) yet you're just dismissing their ability to display love and regarding them as food items?
    1
  20437. @comment sense The problem is that you're trying to force your opinion onto others. Your opinion is that Chinese are somehow inhuman, you've previously stated that the people in China lack empathy, and you look down on China's GDP, income, etc, then it's apparent that you're just anti-China that's all.
    1
  20438. @comment sense The problem is that you're trying to force your opinion onto others. Your opinion is that Chinese are somehow inhuman, you've previously stated that the people in China lack empathy, and you mock China's GDP, income, etc. Then you're basically just being anti-China at this point.
    1
  20439. @comment sense Research scientists at Baylor Medical Center have proven that plants, including vegetables, feel pain when subjected to trauma such as being yanked out. Does this mean humans should stop eating plants?
    1
  20440. @comment sense About innovation in China, China is home to the world's largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are fast and the journeys smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have demonstrated balancing a coin on its edge near the window of a train travelling at 350 mph and the coin remains undisturbed for a long time. Have you seen such videos online of this feat?
    1
  20441.  @gregbrogan9061  "神州 Shenzhou - Taiwan agreed it is part of China, but not part of the PRC. And as I said - PRC says they will invade Taiwan if the ROC amends its borders, so how is ROC to make that amendment?" So since Taiwan is part of China like it agreed, then how can China invade itself? If anything, it just shows that Taiwan is isn't independent after all, since they can't even change their own borders. And since ROC hasn't amended its borders then there's no need to result to miltary options, but it's the last resort if the rogue province decides to break away from the mainland.
    1
  20442.  @gregbrogan9061  "神州 Shenzhou - Yup - this attitude is exactly why even Chinese people hate the PRC. You should be embarrassed. Taiwan IS INDEPENDENT no matter what officially is said." So if Taiwan is independent according to you, then why is it that Taiwan cannot joint the United Nations and the World Health Organization? Is there some force that's stopping Taiwan from joining the UN or the WHO? "Taiwan has it's own government, military, passports, national anthem, etc etc etc." Hong Kong has their own government separate from the mainland. They their own HK passport separate from mainland passport, and they have their own national anthem, yet Hong Kong is clearly part of China after the 1997 return back mainland China.
    1
  20443. ​ @gregbrogan9061  "神州 Shenzhou - You say: "I'm glad you acknowledge the simple fact that the people in Taiwan and Hong Kong are Chinese." Hahahaha! So clearly you know that more and more HK and Taiwan people don't even consider themselves to be Chinese." How does your quoted statement of what I said even indicate that I know that more and more HK and Taiwan people don't even consider themselves to be Chinese? No where in that quoted statement did I ever indicate that, so why are you claiming such a thing? Wasn't your previous statement that you acknowledged the simple fact that the people in Taiwan and Hong Kong are Chinese? "Why do they protest against you - in one HK protest there were 2 million people on the street - that's over 25% of the HK population on the streets protesting China." 2 million people you say? Where do you get this figure of 2 million people? According to reports by Hong Kong Police, they estimated some 240,000 protestors that's all. And even if I give you the benefit of the doubt, you admitted that only around 25% of Hong Kong's population, so clearly it represents a minority of Hong Kong people. Additionally, the Hong Kong people weren't protesting about China, they were protesting about the Hong Kong Extradition Bill proposed by HK Chief Executive Carrie Lam and the extradition bill has since been scrapped.
    1
  20444.  @gregbrogan9061  You said: "So for Taiwan, what is "status quo"? It means actual independence/sovereignty..." No, you are conflating "status quo" with "independence" when it's clear that they aren't the same thing. At John Oliver poll at 18:26 it shows that only a minority (5.6%) of the people of Taiwan want independence, the vast majority of want the status quo to continue, so clearly those two concepts aren't the same. And the status quo (according to Taiwan's constitution) is that Taiwan is part of China. Amending the Taiwan constitution to declare independence would no longer be continuing the status quo, so why are you trying to conflate the two together? You said: "Are you really so ignorant of reality that you will come back to that old document that is not based in reality for your reality? Keep up with the times, this is not 1911-1991! Seriously, it's like you are brain damaged." That "old document" is clearly Taiwan's own constitution, so how am I ignorant of reality? I am quoting actual Taiwan documents, and since even you agree that there is no amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. But instead of living in reality, you are talking about how they are supposedly independent when Taiwan cannot even join the UN or the WHO?
    1
  20445.  @gregbrogan9061  You said: "What is "independence" - all the same as "status quo" Those two concepts are not the same. At 18:28 of John Oliver's poll, we can see that only a minority (5.6%) of the people of Taiwan want independence, and that the majority of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo to continue. So why are you conflating "independence" with "status quo" when they aren't not the same? "What - you think Taiwanese are stupid??" I never said that, but it is you who are clearly trying to twist the meaning behind the poll results, when clearly the majority of the people in Taiwan want the status quo to continue. And we've already established that the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution that Taiwan is part of China. "Aren't you embarrassed that only 1.5% want unification with the mainland?" I am satisfied with the reasonable poll results indicating that majority of people of Taiwan want the status quo to continue (for reasons I mentioned above). The problem with poll results is that things can change drastically from poll to poll, and the 1.5% wanting reunification with the mainland will inevitably increase as mainland China rises. "About 4x as many people would rather have war with China just to be able to say officially they are independent and change the constitution that you keep writing about - even if that means they could lose it all." That constitutes a small percent (5.6%) and my response to such people is that "Who is going to fight?" Even John Oliver mentioned at 20:03 that Taiwan Armed Forces is struggling to attract recruits because they see dwindling numbers of people willing to join the Taiwan military. "That should be so humiliating for the PRC! That is not evidence enough for you?" I mean, apparently you're not even from Taiwan yourself, yet you're trying feebly to make the claim that the people of Taiwan are either independent or want independence, when clearly Taiwan cannot join the UN or WHO and neither do the polls indicate that they want indepedence (majority wants the status quo to continue). And what evidence? I've made my arguments clear regarding Taiwan's constitution and the poll numbers, but you're being disingenuous by conflating "independence" with "status quo" when they are clearly not the same.
    1
  20446.  @gregbrogan9061  "By the way, when you say "Taiwan's Constitution" you are acknowledging that Taiwan is in fact independent." No, I'm merely listing what Taiwan's constitution says, but clearly the reality is that Taiwan is not independent, since they cannot join the UN and the WHO like an independent country can. What's the force preventing Taiwan from joining the UN and the WHO if it was supposedly independent like you say? "It is officially the ROC Constitution, but even you recognize/acknowledge that the reality is that is Taiwan's Constitution (not China's Constitution), so Taiwan has its own constitution like any other independent country." Hong Kong has their own separate "constitution" known as Hong Kong Basic Law (中华人民共和国香港特别行政区基本法) but Hong Kong is part of China after its return in 1997. It shows that even though Taiwan have their own constitution, doesn't necessarily mean that they are an independent country, given that Taiwan cannot join the UN and the WHO. "So thanks for acknowledging the simple fact that Taiwan is indeed independent." Again, if you claim Taiwan is independent, then where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? Why is it that Taiwan cannot join the UN or the WHO? Is there some force that's preventing Taiwan from joining the UN and the WHO?
    1
  20447.  @gregbrogan9061  "神州 Shenzhou - It's funny how much a CCP brainwashed mainlander you are. It's like you see an official document that declares 2+2=5 so it must be true. Come on - reality is 2+2=4 no matter how many times you show the official proclamation that 2+2=5." If you claim that the official document is wrong, then where is the amendment to the official document? Because the reality is that Taiwan is clearly not independent, they cannot even join the UN or the WHO for crying out loud. It's not that what the official document says is wrong, it is that you are looking at the document through your own colored lenses that's all. "That's how mainlanders survive in China - don't think - just regurgitate what the government tells you. Thinking is too dangerous." I can tell from your words, that you're just inherently biased against mainlanders that's all. I've systematically dismantled your argument claiming Taiwan is independent, when in reality, Taiwan cannot join the UN. You tried to conflate "independence" with "status quote", claiming they are all the same, but the polls indicate that majority of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo, not independence (only 5.6%) so how does your argument stand? And we've also established that the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China, that's apparently what the majority of the people of Taiwan prefer.
    1
  20448.  @gregbrogan9061  "神州 Shenzhou - Many now think Taiwan should have entrance into the UN and WHO. Many are getting tired of China's demands." Do you actually have proof of this? The Republic of China's most recent request for admission was turned down in 2007, then do you actually of proof that attitudes are changing? And since you claim Taiwan is independent that why Taiwan cannot join the UN and WHO? It goes to show that Taiwan isn't independent after all, since they can't even declare independence, neither can they join the UN or the WHO. "The USA now has military troops in Taiwan for the first time since 1979... clearly some countries don't pay much attention to China's demands." The people of Taiwan should look at the USA's shambolic withdrawal from Kabul, abandoning their allies, after spending 20 years and pouring trillions of dollars into Afghanistan, only to replace the Taliban with the Taliban. It is clear that the United States doesn't care about the people of Taiwan, they are using the island as a pawn to contain China. "The PRC promised 50 years of HK autonomy and rights - and China is not living up to that... crushed HK rights... You should be ashamed." PRC would have allowed Hong Kong to complete their 50 years of autonomy and rights, but then the 2019 Hong Kong riots happened. And then when Carrie Lam cancelled the Hong Kong extradition bill, the Hong Kong protestors and rioters continued for more than 1 year, even after the bill was cancelled, that's why mainland China had to introduce a Hong Kong National Security Law. Even under Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23, Hong Kong was to enact laws to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government, so this National Security Law has been a long time coming.
    1
  20449.  @gregbrogan9061  You said: "British really made a mistake giving back HK. They should have known that PRC were not going o live up to their promises." Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  20450.  @gregbrogan9061  "神州 Shenzhou You say "How does your quoted statement of what I said even indicate that I know that more and more HK and Taiwan people don't even consider themselves to be Chinese?" Oh please!! Why would you be happy I acknowledge the people of HK and Taiwan are Chinese if this were not in question." Again, you choose to quote my statement "I'm glad you acknowledge the simple fact that the people in Taiwan and Hong Kong are Chinese." but where in this statement did I ever indicate that I know that more and more HK and Taiwan people don't even consider themselves to be Chinese? You are clearly imposing your own assumptions onto me when I never made such an indication. What's wrong with being glad that you acknowledge the simple fact that the people in Taiwan and Hong Kong are Chinese? It's like saying the people in Puerto Rico or Hawaii are Americans isn't it? "Are you saying I'm giving you too much credit for knowing what's going on in HK and Taiwan?" No, I'm just stating that I'm glad you acknowledge the simple fact that the people in Taiwan and Hong Kong are Chinese, that's all I'm saying. Since apparently you also share the same sentiment, then for what reason are we arguing about? "I was in HK during the protests... I witnessed it." Did you count all 2 million people in the protest? According to Hong Kong Police on the ground site, they estimated the number of protestors to be around 250,000 so why are you inflating the numbers to 2 million? I'd rather trust the HK Police (who have to deploy resources and manpower to supervise the protest) than someone who claims there's 2 million protestors just because he "was in HK during the protests... and he witnessed it." "Protesting is not like voting - where on earth have you ever seen 25% of a population protest???" We haven't established that there were 2 million protestors on the streets. I mean, for comparison, the population of Manhattan Island is around 1.6 million, so you're saying that there were more people protesting on the streets in Hong Kong than the population of Manhattan? And even if I give you the benefit of the doubt, 25% of a population is clearly not the majority of the population of Hong Kong.
    1
  20451.  @gregbrogan9061  "OMG!! Why were Hong Kong people protesting about the Hong Kong Extradition Bill???" But the Hong Kong Extradition Bill was proposed by Carrie Lam to cover up a legal loophole. A Hong Kong man (named Chan) had murdered his pregnant girlfriend in Taiwan and he flew back to Hong Kong leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice for his crimes, but because Hong Kong did not had an extradition treaty, they couldn't do so. And since the crime occurred in Taiwan, Hong Kong courts were powerless to convict Chan of murder after what he did in Taiwan, that's why the extradition bill was proposed. Did the Hong Kong protestors even read the extradition bill and understood its contents in their entirety before protesting on the streets? And even after the extradition bill been cancelled by Carrie Lam, the Hong Kong riots still continues unabated, that's why Beijing introduced Hong Kong National Security Law to restore peace and order to Hong Kong. And since the extradition bill has been cancelled, now a HK murder roams freely and there's no justice for the victim's family members. Furthermore, now that this legal loophole has been exposed, Hong Kong might become a safe haven for criminals after they committed crimes elsewhere and then flee to Hong Kong. "How does it feel to have your own people not trust you but trust foreigners? Isn't that humiliating for the PRC? It should be..." This is why the Hong Kong National Security Law is necessary, because foreign forces are infiltrating Hong Kong in order to use it as a pawn to contain the mainland. "Think dude, think... Please, try to use your brain. Use a little logic... Consider what you are saying!" Every word of mine is carefully considered to present my argument in a manner that's as clear and as succinctly as possible. On the other hand, why do you constantly resort to personal insults against me for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    1
  20452.  @gregbrogan9061  "神州 Shenzhou - YOU ARE DEFINITELY BRAIN DAMAGED!! Do you understand the concept of De Facto vs De Jure?" Again with the personal insults. If you claim Taiwan is de facto independent then Why Taiwan can't declare independence? Why is it Taiwan cannot join the UN? If Taiwan was truly de facto independent, then there should be no problems if Taiwan wrote an declaration of independence or joined the UN. But Taiwan can't do that, that means Taiwan is not really independent after all. I've been explaining my arguments through the use of Taiwan's constitution, their lack of amendments, inability to join UN or declare independence, and also the fact that majority of the people of Taiwan polled indicate that they prefer the status quo, NOT independence (5.6%) but your argument is to conflate "independence" and "status quo" as the same, when they clearly aren't. "神州 Shenzhou - If you think "status quo" means PRC owns Taiwan then you are delusional!!" I believe I have never made such a claim, could you please quote me if I made such a claim? All I'm saying is that the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China, didn't I made myself clear before?
    1
  20453.  @gregbrogan9061  "Have you ever been to Taiwan? Did you even watch this vid?" I've been to Taipei before and my opinion is that the buildings look old and some appear to be in disrepair. Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China. Even if you watched John Oliver's video, he clearly states this at 6:16
    1
  20454.  @gregbrogan9061  "Yes = exactly!! Isn't it amazing!!" Again, where's your proof? I searched "2 Million Hong Kong" and BBC articles said that Hong Kong police estimated only 338,000 protestors took to the streets. It says that Jimmy Sham, from the Civil Human Rights Front protest group, told reporters that there were nearly 2 million people, but where did Jimmy Sham get his figure of 2 million from? And again, even if I gave you the benefit of the doubt, 25% of Hong Kong population is clearly not the majority of the population of Hong Kong.
    1
  20455.  @gregbrogan9061  "2+2 does not equal 5 no matter how many times you make it official!" So change it. Where's the amendment to Taiwan's constitution? You keep on complaining that the old document is wrong, yet there hasn't been any correction to any mistake. In fact, most of world recognises Taiwan as part of China, then why do you keep claiming that the document is wrong? I think someone scribbled 2+2=5 on your spectacle lens, and that's why you keep seeing that old document as wrong through your lens. Literally the whole world recognises Taiwan as part of China, I suggest you remove your glasses and take a look at reality.
    1
  20456.  @gregbrogan9061  You wrote a huge wall of text, but it doesn't address the issue that Taiwan cannot join the United Nations and the World Health Organization. De facto independence? Then why can't Taiwan formally declare independence, since you claim it's a fact? And again with John Oliver polls at 18:25 only a minority (5.6%) want independence, but the vast majority of the people of Taiwan want the status quo to continue. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China, since there hasn't been any amendments to it's constitution.
    1
  20457.  @gregbrogan9061  "Do you really not understand why Taiwan does not officially change its constitution?" The simple answer is because Taiwan isn't independent, since they can't even change their constitution, then it just means they aren't independent after all, if there's clearly some force controlling them and preventing them from doing things like joining the UN and WHO. It's all crystal clear to me, but it's like you're viewing Taiwan through lens that someone placed in front of you. "Obviously you know that China's 1.4 billion population is about 60x the 24 million population of Taiwan... So when China demands a one China policy, most countries play along with your official de jure word games." Not only mainland China demands it, even Taiwan agrees to the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China (since the 1992 Consensus), and since there hasn't been any amendments, then Taiwan's agreement remains unchanged. "But just like I understand the de facto situation, there are a few dozen countries that have de facto embassies in Taiwan... And international bodies like the EU and the WTO.... even the Olympics recognize Taiwan separate of China." De facto embassies doesn't mean Taiwan is independent. Hong Kong has over 123 "de facto" embassies in many other countries, but Hong Kong is clearly part of China, as is Taiwan. The EU official position remains not to recognize Taiwan's statehood, and WTO and Olympics only recognize Taiwan as "Chinese Taipei" (aka part of China). I mean, clearly a truly independent country would have no problem setting up real embassies or gaining recognition in UN, and since Taiwan can't do that, then Taiwan is clearly not independent like you claimed.
    1
  20458.  @gregbrogan9061  "You suggest I remove my glasses to see reality... seriously? How can the USA sell $Billions in military weapons to Taiwan without China's approval?" Because Taiwan is a rogue state and it is not uncommon for the USA to sell weapons to rebels against their governments. For example, the U.S facilitated the transfer of an estimated $1 billion in arms, ammunition, and training to Syrian rebel groups against the Assad government. The U.S also sold weapons to Libyan rebels, and likewise, they are doing the same to Taiwan. "So Taiwan can agree to status quo which keeps de facto independence without claiming official independence so that Taiwan doesn't have an invasion by a country 60x their size with the second largest military in the world." And what is the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Amending Taiwan's constitution would be considered changing the status quo, and that is not what the majority of the people of Taiwan want (evident in the poll numbers). But again, you're trying to conflate "independence" with "status quo" when they are clearly not the same.
    1
  20459.  @TheCouchchicago  Because I asked so many people who think Taiwan is independent: why Taiwan cannot join the UN or WHO, and they can't refute this simple fact that Taiwan is not independent. Because there is a force preventing Taiwan from doing so, therefore, it's clearly not independent.
    1
  20460.  @user-iq2nm4wy6j  About Education in China, As of 2013, China has also become a top destination for international students, ranking 3rd in the world, according to Institute of International Education. China ranks 3rd among countries that host the most international students, IIE reports Source: usnews(dot)com/education/best-global-universities/articles/2013/10/08/explore-the-worlds-top-universities China is also the most popular destination in Asia for international students, surpassing other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, India, Singapore, etc in sheer number of international students.
    1
  20461.  @atodaso1668  China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: Wikipedia: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities
    1
  20462.  @atodaso1668  Tibet is part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Tibet broke free of China in 1913, but was reunited with the mainland by 1951, so why should China give up our territory? Tibet was part of China for longer than the Western colonists colonised Americas.
    1
  20463.  @mostlibsaretards  Why radiation cabbage? What has radiation got to do with Chinese produce? China is world's largest producer of cabbages and we even export our agricultural produce to help feed other countries. Source: Wikipedia: Cabbage
    1
  20464.  @DragonmasterCire  Well, what were the US troops even doing halfway across the world in Vietnam in the first place? Same goes with Afghanistan, it just shows that the US involves itself in conflicts, only to pull out when it no longer suits them to continue. Perhaps the same is coming soon with Ukraine.
    1
  20465. The government is building roads and infrastructure in the poorer provinces in Western China, like Xinjiang and Tibet, to allow some of the wealth in Eastern China to flow towards these parts and not cut them off from progress.
    1
  20466. +Sahil Khan China built Qinghai-Tibet Railway, world's highest elevation railway, to connect isolated Tibet to the rest of the world and improve their lives. This railway passthrough regions of permafrost and low oxygen conditions, such that there are special oxygen tanks in each compartment, as well as a specially trained doctor assigned to each passenger train at all times.
    1
  20467. +Sahil Khan China already has the world's largest high speed railway system, with more track length than rest of the world combined.
    1
  20468. Since when does China have more protectionist measures in place than America? Since 2008, the United States is the world's most protectionist country with over 800 protectionist measures, compare to China with only 200-300 of such measures. Source:Map of Protectionist measures taken by countries wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Protectionist_measures_taken_2008–2013_according_to_Global_Trade_Alert.png
    1
  20469. Countries with the highest Game of Thrones piracy activity in 2017, according to MUSO (anti-piracy company): 1. United States of America: 15,075,951 2. United Kingdom: 6,252,903 3. Germany: 4,897,280 4. India: 4,335,331 5. Indonesia: 4,286,927 6. Philippines: 4,189,030 7. Canada: 3,182,851 8. France: 2,881,467 9. Turkey: 2,802,458 10. Vietnam: 2,436,149 11. Australia: 2,241,463 12. Russian Federation: 2,196,799 13. Netherlands: 1,881,718 14. Brazil: 1,796,759 15. Malaysia: 1,737,005
    1
  20470. True, but that's only if USA, Canada, etc agrees with the project.
    1
  20471. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20472. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  20473. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20474.  @intothewrx  In the past, Hong Kong was once a prosperous port city under authoritarian British colonial rule, while the mainland was still dirt-poor at that time. However, fortunes have reversed today and Hong Kong has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan and is facing increasing levels of competition from other upcoming mainland port cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian. Source: Wikipedia: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports Source: Wikipedia: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage#2012%E2%80%932017 No wonder why the people of Hong Kong feel like they are being left behind as mainland cities start surpassing Hong Kong.
    1
  20475. LegoGuy87 They were agreed upon by USA and South Korea, not North Korea.
    1
  20476. The earliest Chinese characters existed since 1200 BC, so throughout the passage of over 3000 years, the spoken languages are bound to change and evolve. Just like Shakespearean English sounds different from modern English.
    1
  20477. Why should Asia-Pacific be "democratized"? Because you say so? Nobody said "democracy" is the only form of government allowed.
    1
  20478. nikfaizal Politics should be about doing what's right, not what's popular. Sometimes the popular thing may not be right and the right thing may not be popular. Democracy is only doing what's popular, but not necessarily what's right that's all.
    1
  20479.  @feonor26  "神州 Shenzhou This is not how you fight religion efficiently and correctly." How then? China is officially atheist under the Communist Party of China, then can't China reserve the right to promote atheism within our country, much the same as Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Indonesia do with Islam (or Christian countries do with Christianity)?
    1
  20480.  @feonor26  "神州 Shenzhou How? Not by force or by making it illegal or by bullying people." What makes you think religion is illegal in China? China has nearly 200 million religious believers and more than 380,000 clerical personnel. The five major religions practiced in China are Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism, and Protestantism. There are around 222,000 Buddhist clerical personnel and over 40,000 Taoist clerical personnel. There are around 20 million Muslims, with about 57,000 Islamic clerical personnel. Catholicism and Protestantism have 6 million and 38 million followers in China, respectively, with 8,000 and 57,000 clerical personnel. There are approximately 5,500 religious groups in China, including seven national organizations which are Buddhist Association of China, Chinese Taoist Association, China Islamic Association, Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association, Bishops’ Conference of Catholic Church in China, National Committee of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement of the Protestant Churches in China, and China Christian Council.
    1
  20481.  @feonor26  "神州 Shenzhou How? Not by force or by making it illegal or by bullying people." What makes you think religion is illegal in China? China has nearly 200 million religious believers and more than 380,000 clerical personnel. The five major religions practiced in China are Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism, and Protestantism. There are around 222,000 Buddhist clerical personnel and over 40,000 Taoist clerical personnel. There are around 20 million Muslims, with about 57,000 Islamic clerical personnel. Catholicism and Protestantism have 6 million and 38 million followers in China, respectively, with 8,000 and 57,000 clerical personnel.
    1
  20482.  @feonor26  China has nearly 200 million religious believers and more than 380,000 clerical personnel. The five major religions practiced in China are Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism, and Protestantism. There are around 222,000 Buddhist clerical personnel and over 40,000 Taoist clerical personnel. There are around 20 million Muslims, with about 57,000 Islamic clerical personnel. Catholicism and Protestantism have 6 million and 38 million followers in China, respectively, with 8,000 and 57,000 clerical personnel.
    1
  20483.  @feonor26  There are approximately 5,500 religious groups in China, including seven national organizations which are Buddhist Association of China, Chinese Taoist Association, China Islamic Association, Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association, Bishops’ Conference of Catholic Church in China, National Committee of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement of the Protestant Churches in China, and China Christian Council. At present, there are about 144,000 places of worship registered for religious activities in China, among which are 33,500 Buddhist temples (including 28,000 Han Buddhist temples, 3,800 Tibetan Buddhist lamaseries, and 1,700 Theravada Buddhist temples), 9,000 Taoist temples, 35,000 Islamic mosques, 6,000 Catholic churches and places of assembly spread across 98 dioceses, and 60,000 Protestant churches and places of assembly, Yet you said: "神州 Shenzhou How? Not by force or by making it illegal or by bullying people."
    1
  20484.  @muntadar1655  "神州 Shenzhou what about your communist religion" Communism is inherently atheist and doesn't believe in the existence of gods, so how is it a religion?
    1
  20485.  @feonor26  "神州 Shenzhou I know the Communist Party's views on religion. They want nothing but loyalty to The Party." Is there something fundamentally wrong with being loyal to the communist party? Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (everything's Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under the communist party leadership, then can't the people of China choose the Party over religion? I mean, what has some nameless, faceless being up above ever did for China, as compared to the communist party?
    1
  20486.  @feonor26  Earlier you wrote: "China still has an ideology called Communism where the a god has almost been replaced by the party leader." Communist party leaders, both past and present (i.e Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, Xi Jinping) have done much to contribute to China's growth, transforming our country from a once dirt-poor, war-torn starving nation, into a prosperous, economic juggernaut and growing scientific power today, whereas what has some nameless, faceless being ever done for China? Then honestly speaking, can't Chinese praise the actual deeds performed by real people, rather than some god that did nothing for China? You told me that the proper method is to use debate, arguments and scientific reasoning, and those are the methods that I am employing. Communist leaders have enacted real tangible change in China as compared to nameless, faceless entities that did nothing for China.
    1
  20487.  @feonor26  "When that party is authoritarian, power hungry and fundamentally anti-democratic then yes, it is wrong." China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. I meant, you told me that the proper method is to use debate, arguments and scientific reasoning, yet you're employing emotions not logic for your arguments.
    1
  20488.  @feonor26  "When that party is authoritarian, power hungry and fundamentally anti-democratic then yes, it is wrong." China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  20489.  @feonor26  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. Yet you're claiming "When that party is authoritarian, power hungry and fundamentally anti-democratic then yes, it is wrong."?
    1
  20490.  @feonor26  Chairman Mao is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  20491.  @dave_sic1365  Those people starved to death because of the Great Chinese Famine, which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Chairman Mao couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because his objective is to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. And what makes you think Chinese culture is destroyed? China has many historical monuments like The Great Wall of China, the Forbidden City, The Qin Emperor Tomb (China's First Emperor), the Terracotta Army, The Grand Canal (world's longest artificial river). If you look up list of UNESCO World Heritage Sites, China actually ranks 2nd in the world after Italy. Countries by number of UNESCO World Heritage Sites as of July 2021 1. Italy (58 sites) 2. China (56 sites) 3. Germany (51 sites) 4. France (49 sites) 5. Spain (49 sites) 6. India (40 sites) 7. Mexico (35 sites) 8. United Kingdom (33 sites) 9. Russia (30 sites) 10. Iran (26 sites) ... Source: UNESCO World Heritage So unless you are Italian yourself, then China literally has more UNESCO World Heritage Sites than even your own country! Yet you're claiming Chinese culture is destroyed?
    1
  20492.  @feonor26  "Yes China has been around for a long time in different shapes but so has other countries and people. China has not been the same for all these 5000 years." Take ancient writing scripts for example and Chinese characters constitute the oldest continuously used system of writing in the world, having been used since 1200 BCE and today, Mandarin Chinese is the most spoken language in the world by number of speakers. Whereas other ancient scripts like Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia) Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered dead languages today, since they are no longer evolving with the times and no new words being added into their vocabulary. Source: Chinese characters wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_characters
    1
  20493. ​ @feonor26  You said: "Your culture today is nowhere near the culture of ancient China." A bold assumption. Have you actually been to China and experienced Chinese culture for yourself here? Chinese celebrate many traditional cultures and festivals, like for example, Spring Festival (Chinese New Year), Qingming (Tomb Sweeping) Festival, Dragon Boat Festival, Lantern Festival, Mid-Autumn Festival, Double Ninth (Chinese Valentine's Day) Festival, which are long ago festivals that are still celebrated today in China. You said: "The culture you have today is a product of Mao's communism. That dude almost destroyed your country." China's current political system (under President Xi and the Communist Party of China) closely emulates the ancient Chinese system of governance under the Emperor and the Imperial Court. And what makes you think Chinese history and culture is destroyed? China has many historical monuments like for example, the The Great Wall of China, the Forbidden City, The Qin Emperor Tomb (China's First Emperor), the Terracotta Army, The Grand Canal (world's longest artificial river). If you look up list of UNESCO World Heritage Sites, China actually ranks 2nd in the world after Italy. Countries by number of UNESCO World Heritage Sites as of July 2021 1. Italy (58 sites) 2. China (56 sites) 3. Germany (51 sites) 4. France (49 sites) 5. Spain (49 sites) 6. India (40 sites) 7. Mexico (35 sites) 8. United Kingdom (33 sites) 9. Russia (30 sites) 10. Iran (26 sites) ... Source: UNESCO World Heritage
    1
  20494.  @feonor26  You said: "Your culture today is nowhere near the culture of ancient China." A bold assumption. Have you actually been to China and experienced Chinese culture for yourself here? Chinese celebrate many traditional cultures and festivals, like for example, Spring Festival (Chinese New Year), Qingming (Tomb Sweeping) Festival, Dragon Boat Festival, Lantern Festival, Mid-Autumn Festival, Double Ninth (Chinese Valentine's Day) Festival, which are long ago festivals that are still celebrated today in China. You said: "The culture you have today is a product of Mao's communism. That dude almost destroyed your country." China's current political system (under President Xi and the Communist Party of China) closely emulates the ancient Chinese system of governance under the Emperor and the Imperial Court. And what makes you think Chinese history and culture is destroyed? China has many historical monuments like for example, the The Great Wall of China, the Forbidden City, The Qin Emperor Tomb (China's First Emperor), the Terracotta Army, The Grand Canal (world's longest artificial river). If you look up list of UNESCO World Heritage Sites, China actually ranks 2nd in the world after Italy. Countries by number of UNESCO World Heritage Sites as of July 2021 1. Italy (58 sites) 2. China (56 sites) 3. Germany (51 sites) 4. France (49 sites) 5. Spain (49 sites) 6. India (40 sites) 7. Mexico (35 sites) 8. United Kingdom (33 sites) 9. Russia (30 sites) 10. Iran (26 sites) ... Source: UNESCO World Heritage wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Heritage_Site#Countries_with_15_or_more_sites
    1
  20495.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Meng should never have been arrested." So why don't Canada release Meng Wanzhou and put her on the first flight back to China? Canada started this whole mess, even you agree, then Canada know exactly how to end this mess that they started.
    1
  20496. @Sheriff Lobo "神州 Shenzhou where's the written reasons for Michael Spavors guilty verdict." I read my OP and did I ever mention anything about Michael Spavors here in this thread? Then why are you bringing him up here? And what hyperlink are you talking about?
    1
  20497.  @MarkYeung1  Not so fast though. If Meng is released, then that means Canada arbitrarily detained Meng for no reason for 3 years, then what's the explanation? That it was the United States striking an economic blow against Huawei and Canada was complicit to this?
    1
  20498.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Canada can then charge Meng with espionage like China charged the Michaels." Where's the evidence of Meng Wanzhou espionage? Why would Huawei CEO sent his daughter to conduct espionage?
    1
  20499. @Sheriff Lobo If you're saying that China has 99% conviction rate, well, Japan has 99% conviction rate and Canada has around 97% conviction rate. "In Canada, the national conviction rate is about 97%. This does not include cases in which the charges are dropped, which comprise about one-third of criminal cases. Absent Quebec, the province with the lowest conviction rate, the figure is 99%" "In Japan, the criminal justice system has a conviction rate that exceeds 99%, including guilty plea cases. This has been attributed to low prosecutorial budgets impelling understaffed prosecutors to bring only the most obviously guilty defendants to trial." In my opinion, having a low conviction rate is worrying, because it implies that the police are arresting innocent people. It's possible that a high conviction rate is because the police are doing a good job arresting people who are guilty.
    1
  20500.  @MarkYeung1  Why don't you answer my question first if you want me to answer yours? Why would Huawei CEO sent his own daughter to conduct espionage in another country?
    1
  20501.  @MarkYeung1  Many Hong Kong youth people aren't aware of the Century of Humiliation and the Opium Wars. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  20502.  @MarkYeung1  Many in Hong Kong are still afflicted by the subservient "colonial mindset" that colonization imposes onto colonized people. Hong Kong may have been decolonized by Britain after the 1997 handover, but the "decolonization of the mind" takes a longer time to heal from. The people of Hong Kong need to stop putting Westerners on a pedestal and worshiping their colonial masters as somehow superior. Otherwise, Hong Kong will never recover from decolonization when the mind is still "colonized".
    1
  20503.  @MarkYeung1  June 4th is a myth. According to Gregory Clark, the original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Check out Gregory Clark's article entitled: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies (By Gregory Clark)
    1
  20504.  @MarkYeung1  Could you explain how mainland China can improve the image in Hong Kong and overseas? China has many success stories to tell and share with the rest of the world, but much of Western MSM seems primarily interested in painting negative image of China and "demonising" our country. It's like no matter what good China does, many Westerners are going to harbor negative opinion about China regardless.
    1
  20505.  @alexhe926  The Hong Kong Youth need to first start with "decolonization of the mind". The British may have returned Hong Kong back to mainland China in 1997, but many Hong Kong youth are suffering from the effects of colonization, such as the subservient colonial mindset imposed onto them. Education is what shapes a young person's view of the world when he/she grows up. Many Hong Kong youths have been taught the British version of the Century of Humiliation, the Opium Wars, Boxer Rebellion, etc, and they weren't taught the mainland China's version, except for negative events like Great Leap Forward, Cultural Revolution, June 4th etc. As a 14-year old yourself, I would humbly advise you to seek information from multiple sources, look at arguments from multiple points of view in pursue of the truth and draw your own conclusions yourselves. As young people get older, we tend to become set in our ways and our viewpoints, so much such that even exposure to the opposite viewpoint, won't change our minds. But young people are at the stage where you are open to different view points. I would welcome you to study in China as an international student. It is your home country after all as it is mine, and it would never change. Even for those overseas Chinese that have long denounced their homeland, it doesn't change the fact that China is still their homeland.
    1
  20506.  @MarkYeung1  Hong Kong enjoys freedoms like no other. According to Canadian Economic Freedom of the World, in 2017, Hong Kong (8.91) and Singapore (8.71) were in first and second place respectively; According to Index of Freedom in the World, in 2019, the freest countries/regions were New Zealand (8.88), Switzerland (8.82), and Hong Kong SAR, (8.81). Highest ranking in economic freedoms were Hong Kong (8.91) and Singapore (8.71).
    1
  20507.  @MarkYeung1  I'm still waiting for your explanation how is Hong Kong a puppet government of Beijing? Hong Kong clearly have their own separate government from the mainland and Beijing does not cast any votes in 1200 Election Committee, all votes were cast by the Hong Kong citizens themselves and none were by Beijing. Look at prosperous Shenzhen (深圳) on the mainland next to Hong Kong, and that's an example of a city governed by the Communist Party of China. In the 1980s, Hong Kong was prosperous port city under British colonial rule, and Shenzhen dirt-poor wetland village at that time, but today, Shenzhen has transformed from backwater village into skyscraper city home to the latest gadgets, smartphones, cameras, drones, Artificial Intelligence systems, automation, robotics, 5G networks, etc. While Hong Kong has clearly suffered under their own democratic government, Hong Kong used to make 18% of China's economy in 1997, but today Hong Kong makes up for only 2%.
    1
  20508.  @MarkYeung1  Tiananmen Square Massacre is clearly a myth, even Wikileaks has shown there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989. Yet many Westerners still continue to believe in Tiananmen Square Massacre, so what makes you think Westerners will believe China's side of the story? And why should China gradually introduce democratic reform? China's current political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so? Look at Singapore, Singapore has been governed by authoritarian single-party PAP for its entire life a nation. For 56 years the People's Action Party ruled Singapore with an iron fist and Singapore transformed from a once sleepy fishing village nation, into a world class country today compared to neighbouring ASEAN countries. Similar to how China has been successfully governed by authoritarian CPC for 71 years. Like I said earlier, more Hong Kong people need to first "decolonize their mind" because your mindset still follows the subservient colonial mentality that colonization inflicts on the minds of the colonized. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  20509.  @MarkYeung1  So why was the Hong Kong National Security Law even necessary in the first place? Because previously, Hong Kong had too much freedom. The 2019 Hong Kong riots had lasted for more than 1 year. Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam even scrapped the Extradition Bill that started this whole mess, yet the Hong Kong riots still continued. How long would the Hong Kong riots continue if not for the Hong Kong National Security Law? You wanted the riots to continue indefinitely, is that what you're saying? Every state/country has their own National Security Law, whether USA, UK, France, Germany, etc, so can't mainland China introduce Hong Kong National Security Law? Even under Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 (香港基本法第二十三條) it states that Hong Kong shall enact laws to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government (aka Beijing), or theft of state secrets, to prohibit foreign political organizations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region, and to prohibit political organizations or bodies of the Region from establishing ties with foreign political organizations or bodies.
    1
  20510.  @MarkYeung1  That 14 year Chinese kid is unsure. I'm asking you for your explanation how is Hong Kong a puppet government of Beijing, you tell me? Hong Kong clearly have their own separate government from the mainland and Beijing does not cast any votes in 1200 Election Committee, all votes were cast by the Hong Kong citizens themselves and none were by Beijing. Earlier, both you and I agree that Hong Kong actually has enough land to spare for its citizens, it's just that the Hong Kong property tycoons control the land prices and Hong Kong government is powerless against this because it relies on sales and taxation of land for revenue, so how is Hong Kong government a puppet of Beijing? Why would Beijing want to cause such property troubles in Hong Kong, you tell me? Or are you just blaming mainland China for Hong Kong's woes?
    1
  20511.  @MarkYeung1  What's there to uncensor something that didn't happen? Even after Wikileaks revealed that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, many Westerners still continue to believe the Myth that Tiananmen Square Massacre happened. Japanese Government does edit their historical textbooks to whitewash their WWII atrocities and significantly downplays Japanese aggression. Source: Japanese history textbook controversies wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_history_textbook_controversies
    1
  20512.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou I am sure that Hong Kong government is a puppet of China. Alex also said he feels that way." Please explain your reasoning. Alex has said he thinks he maybe wrong. I have elaborated multiple times how Hong Kong government clearly have their own separate government and Beijing does not cast any votes in the 1200-member Election Committee. And I've also stated how Hong Kong National Security Law was part of Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 (香港基本法第二十三條). I mean, think of it, why was Beijing forced to implement Hong Kong National Security Law? What triggered it? The 2019 Hong Kong riots right? Even after Carrie Lam scrapped the Hong Kong Extradition Bill, the Hong Kong riots still continue for more than 1 year, so Beijing had no choice but to implement Hong Kong National Security Law to finally put an end to the Hong Kong riots. I mean, would you have preferred 2019 Hong Kong riots to continue indefinitely? Until 2020, 2021 and beyond? It really looks as though you're just unreasonably blaming Beijing for Hong Kong's woes that's all
    1
  20513.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Japanese government doesn't FORBID the people from learning the truth. Chinese government FORBID the people from learning the truth." How is Chinese government forbidding the people from learning the truth? Which person in China has been arrested just for learning the truth about June 4th, you tell me? The "no bloodshed" inside Tiananmen Square was from Wikileaks cables, yet many Westerners still believe the myth of Tiananmen Square massacre even though Wikileaks cables shows it isn't true. According to Wikileaks Cables: a Chilean diplomat (Carlos Gallo) and his wife gave an eyewitness account of the events in Tiananmen Square. He watched the military enter the Square, but did not observe any mass firing of weapons into the crowds. He said that most of the troops which entered the Square were actually armed only with anti-riot gear like truncheons and wooden clubs. All this information is freely available in the West, yet why do many Westerners continue to believe the myth of Tiananmen Massacre?
    1
  20514. Sounds like what the Germans did during WWII.
    1
  20515.  @knowitall5913  Yes, the West should stop spreading hate towards China.
    1
  20516. Turns out that many civilian casualties were actually caused by crossfire from the IDF.
    1
  20517.  @TheRealCheckmate  It just shows that being an ally to the USA is fatal. The U.S will transfer Taiwan's TMSC chip manufacturing technologies to America, so that Taiwan is of no further importance and U.S won't feel obliged to defend the island. It's a dumb move on Taiwan's part.
    1
  20518.  @TheRealCheckmate  "The last thing I want to see is this technology find it's way into a CCP-controlled China." But why can't China have this technology? China is the world's factory, most of the world's products have the Made-in-China stamp on them. Adding high end chip manufacturing will improve the quality of Chinese products even further, so isn't that a boon for the rest of the world as well? Or what? Is the thought of China succeeding under the Communist Party simply too frightening for you to fathom?
    1
  20519.  @TheRealCheckmate  But why can't China have this technology? China is the world's factory, most of the world's products have the Made-in-China stamp on them. Adding high end chip manufacturing will improve the quality of Chinese products even further, so isn't that a boon for the rest of the world as well? Or perhaps it's because you can't stand to see China succeed under the leadership of the Communist Party of China?
    1
  20520.  @TheRealCheckmate  But why can't China have this technology? China is the world's factory. Adding this technology will further improve the quality of Chinese products, so isn't that a boon for the rest of the world as well? Or perhaps it's because you can't stand to see China succeed under the leadership of the Communist Party of China?
    1
  20521.  @TheRealCheckmate  "The last thing I want to see is this technology find it's way into a CCP-controlled China." But why not? China is already the manufacturing hub of the world and this technology will further improve the quality of Chinese products, so isn't that a boon for the rest of the world? Or perhaps you just can't stand to see China succeed under the leadership of the Communist Party of China?
    1
  20522.  @TheRealCheckmate  But why not? China is already the manufacturing hub of the world and this technology will further improve the quality of Chinese products, so isn't that a boon for the rest of the world? Or perhaps you just can't stand to see China succeed under the leadership of the CPC?
    1
  20523.  @TheRealCheckmate  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  20524.  @fireturkeyfly11  Guess which country has the world's most number of covid cases and deaths? Definitely not China.
    1
  20525. In China, political candidates whom have demonstrated competence get promoted. In the United States, political candidates whom have demonstrated incompetence get elected.
    1
  20526.  @footytube9500  What makes you think the communist party burnt all Confucius books? The Five Classics (五經) are available in China and they include the Classic of Poetry (詩經), Book of Documents (書經), Book of Rites (禮記), I Ching (易經), and the Spring and Autumn annals (春秋).
    1
  20527.  @pahatpahat9566  I had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, and I was appalled at the sheer amount of Western anti-China propaganda out there. It's like many Westerners claim to know all about China, even though they never actually set foot in China and see what life is like here for themselves.
    1
  20528. hayat manzili What about the Uighur riots in Urumqi, where Uighur rioters stabbed and killed Han Chinese passers-by, broke into Han businesses and looted their stores? The CCP only wants to prevent another Urumqi riot from happening again in the future.
    1
  20529. Dumbledores Army You said 750,000 Uyghurs have been killed by the Chinese government from 1964-1995? Where's the proof of your claims? According to Wikipedia: Demographics of China the population of Uyghurs in China was 3,996,311 (1964) 5,917,030 (1982) 7,207,024 (1990) 9,816,802 (2000) So how exactly did you arrive at your figure of 750,000 Uyghurs being killed by Chinese government?
    1
  20530. +hayat manzili Why don't you ever produce evidence to support your accusations?
    1
  20531. Actually, it's mostly the minority of the people within the U.S government and media, that are responsible for the deteriorating relations between our countries. If the mindsets of their government and media could be changed, then the world would be much more peaceful.
    1
  20532.  @Darkademic  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了
    1
  20533.  @Darkademic  (Continued from List of all 650+ rulers of China) Zhou dynasty (1046–256 BCE) Wu 武 (1042–1006 BCE) Cheng 成 (1042–1006 BCE) Kang 康 (1005–978 BCE) Zhao 昭 (977–957 BCE) Mu 穆 (956–918 BCE) Gong 共 (917–900 BCE) Yih 懿 (899–873 BCE) Xiao 孝 (872–866 BCE) Yí 夷 (865–858 BCE) Li 厲 (857–842 BCE) Xuan 宣 (827–782 BCE) You 幽 (782–771 BCE) Ping 平 (770–720 BCE) Huan 桓 (719–697 BCE) Zhuang 莊 (696–682 BCE) Xi 釐 (681–677 BCE) Hui 惠 (676–652 BCE) Xiang 襄 (651–619 BCE) Qing 頃 (618–613 BCE) Kuang 匡 (612–607 BCE) Ding 定 (606–586 BCE) Jian 簡 (585–572 BCE) Ling 靈 (571–545 BCE) Jing 景 (544–521 BCE) Dao 悼 (520 BCE) Jing 敬 (519–476 BCE) ... Warring States period (戰國時代; 475–221 BCE)
    1
  20534.  @Darkademic  Zhou dynasty (1046–256 BCE) Wu 武 (1042–1006 BCE) Cheng 成 (1042–1006 BCE) Kang 康 (1005–978 BCE) Zhao 昭 (977–957 BCE) Mu 穆 (956–918 BCE) Gong 共 (917–900 BCE) Yih 懿 (899–873 BCE) Xiao 孝 (872–866 BCE) Yí 夷 (865–858 BCE) Li 厲 (857–842 BCE) Xuan 宣 (827–782 BCE) You 幽 (782–771 BCE) Ping 平 (770–720 BCE) Huan 桓 (719–697 BCE) Zhuang 莊 (696–682 BCE) Xi 釐 (681–677 BCE) Hui 惠 (676–652 BCE) Xiang 襄 (651–619 BCE) Qing 頃 (618–613 BCE) Kuang 匡 (612–607 BCE) Ding 定 (606–586 BCE) Jian 簡 (585–572 BCE) Ling 靈 (571–545 BCE) Jing 景 (544–521 BCE) Dao 悼 (520 BCE) Jing 敬 (519–476 BCE)
    1
  20535.  @Darkademic  Zhou dynasty (1046–256 BCE) Wu 武 (1042–1006 BCE) Cheng 成 (1042–1006 BCE) Kang 康 (1005–978 BCE) Zhao 昭 (977–957 BCE) Mu 穆 (956–918 BCE) Gong 共 (917–900 BCE) Yih 懿 (899–873 BCE) Xiao 孝 (872–866 BCE) Yí 夷 (865–858 BCE) Li 厲 (857–842 BCE) Xuan 宣 (827–782 BCE) You 幽 (782–771 BCE) Ping 平 (770–720 BCE) ...
    1
  20536.  @Darkademic  Zhou dynasty (1046–256 BCE) Wu 武 (1042–1006 BCE) Cheng 成 (1042–1006 BCE) Kang 康 (1005–978 BCE) Zhao 昭 (977–957 BCE) Mu 穆 (956–918 BCE) Gong 共 (917–900 BCE) Yi 懿 (899–873 BCE) Xiao 孝 (872–866 BCE) Yí 夷 (865–858 BCE) Li 厲 (857–842 BCE) Xuan 宣 (827–782 BCE) You 幽 (782–771 BCE) Ping 平 (770–720 BCE) Huan 桓 (719–697 BCE) Zhuang 莊 (696–682 BCE) Xi 釐 (681–677 BCE) Hui 惠 (676–652 BCE) Xiang 襄 (651–619 BCE) Qing 頃 (618–613 BCE) Kuang 匡 (612–607 BCE) Ding 定 (606–586 BCE) Jian 簡 (585–572 BCE) Ling 靈 (571–545 BCE) Jing 景 (544–521 BCE) Dao 悼 (520 BCE) Jing 敬 (519–476 BCE)...
    1
  20537.  @Darkademic  "If you just mean that "Mao won, so he could do whatever he wanted", then sure, but that doesn't change the fact that a Western ideology became the dominant political philosophy of China," Mao won where many others have failed. Even the previous administration. Kuomintang (KMT) had ruled over the Republic of China (1912-1949) for 37 years prior, yet even they failed to reunify China. I cannot emphasis just how big China is and how difficult it is to unify all the provinces under a single philosophy. Marxism was what formed the basis of the founding of the People's Republic of China, so it's only natural that it remains the dominant political philosophy of China. As far as I know, Marxism continues to enjoy support, since many Chinese are content to continue supporting the CPC (as long as they can deliver economic progress) yet why is it you of all people, that's seemingly opposed to it? Earlier you claimed Chinese are too nationalistic, yet here is an example of China using a Western ideology as its basis. So what gives?
    1
  20538.  @Darkademic  "So what?? Making a list of people who ruled over very vaguely similar areas of land is nothing special, you could do the same for most of the world." Could you show me an example from your own country then? Not only do Chinese have the names of all the rulers of China, but also the names of the all the Chinese empresses and queens, the names of the Emperor's children and which child eventually succeeded the father, or whether the emperors were eventually overthrown by rebellion.
    1
  20539.  @Darkademic  "(but not sure I would use the word _natural_)." Could you explain how's it not natural in your view? Mao's reunification of China under Marxism couldn't have happen if he didn't have the majority support of the people. At that time, the majority of people in China were peasants, while the KMT supporters were rich landlords and foreign powers. During the Japanese invasion of China, the KMT mostly defended the urban centers (where the rich resided), while the communists defended the rural countryside (where the majority, mostly peasants, resided) from the Japanese invaders. That was how Marxist ideology spread among the peasants, leading to support for Mao's cause and eventually the overthrowing of the KMT government to Taiwan island. The people's eyes were open to actions taken by both sides, and they could see for themselves which ideology they wanted for China. It was an organic, grassroot movement, so in my opinion, it's certainly apt to call it natural.
    1
  20540.  @Darkademic  You said: "I'm not really sure how many people in China really understand Marxism... I was a Marxist for a long time and have studied it extensively. I still have the entire works of Marx on my bookshelf." People in China have literally experienced Marxism transforming their lives, turning China from a poor, war-torn, starving county in the past into what it is today. Whereas it appears that you have only studied books of Karl Marx, possibly having never experiencing it for yourself, then what more is there to day? Had you truly been a Marxist yourself, then you would have known of the Soviet Union's achievements, the transformation of Russia from arguably the poorest European country pre-Bolshevik Revolution, into arguably the strongest in Europe as the Soviet Union. It's astonishing that you constantly bring up death toll of communism, but have you looked up the death toll of capitalism for comparison? It's far worse.
    1
  20541.  @Darkademic  You said: "You can be nationalistic while supporting an ideology which has foreign origins, though there is certainly a degree of cognitive dissonance involved in that." Look, throughout this thread you've been complaining about Chinese nationalism, yet when Marxism is brought up as the political basis of PRC, you claim its unrelated? If anything, it shows that China is open to accepting new ideas despite having a wealth of political knowledge accumulated throughout its long history. How's that being nationalistic? "In the case of Chinese people, it's probably just that they don't see it as foreign anymore," That shows that the problem doesn't lie with Chinese people. Chinese are what we are, and we have accepted it and even embraced it. Therefore, it appears that the problem lies with your own perception of Chinese. You can't accept China embracing a foreign ideology (which has been perceived as a "catastrophic failure" in your eyes) and actually succeeding with it.
    1
  20542.  @Darkademic  In your article, you claim that no causal relationship can be demonstrated between capitalism and the harm it is allegedly responsible for. But the same could also be said of that of socialism. For example, both the Soviet Union and People's Republic of China had experienced bad weather that damaged crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Furthermore, the US embargo on China during the Great Chinese Famine also contributed to China being unable to import sufficient food. Yet it is assumed that all the deaths that occurred in Soviet Union and China are the result of socialism.
    1
  20543.  @Darkademic  In your closing thoughts, you wrote that capitalism is responsible for the greatest increase in living standards the human race has ever experienced. But if you look at the graph of life expectancy, the greatest increase (steepest gradient) occurred in the Rest (orange line) of the world, outside of the West (light blue line) from 1900s-2000s. The 1900s was the period where the Soviet Union was formed (1930) as well as the formation of the People's Republic of China (1949), so how can you attribute the increase in living standards in these countries to that of capitalism?
    1
  20544.  @Darkademic  "This was addressed already; life expectancy increased in Africa (which I assume you don't regard as a success story of living standards)." In one of my earlier posts, I clearly wrote: "Africa's life expectancy rising represents a rise in the quality of living (since Africans are living longer)." Also, the entire population of Africa in 1900 was 140 million, accounting for just 9% of the world's population, whereas China's population in 1900 was 400 million accounting for accounting for around 20% of the world's population, so how can you attribute the increase in living standards in these countries to that of capitalism?
    1
  20545.  @Darkademic  In you're article, you wrote that "Tens of millions have been lifted from poverty as a result of people being free to innovate, produce and trade goods and services," but the greatest poverty alleviation occurred in China. According to the World Bank, China has lifted nearly 800 million people out of poverty over the past 40 years, accounting for more than 75 percent of global poverty.
    1
  20546.  @Darkademic  "Life expectancy does not equal quality of living." People in African countries are living twice as long, how does that not represent a rise in the quality of living? Look, even in your own article ("The Absurd Claim that Capitalism Kills") you included a graph of Life Expectancy at birth, West and the Rest, and then proceeded to make the claim that "Capitalism is responsible for the greatest increase in living standards the human race has ever experienced." So even in your article, you equate an increase in life expectancy as equal to a rise in living standards. Still it doesn't change the fact that in the 1900s, Africa's entire population accounts for just 9% of the world's population, whereas China's population in 1900 accounts for around 20% of the world's population. The
    1
  20547.  @Darkademic  "However, as per one of my original points, it has been sliding back towards authoritarianism and central planning, which has predictably had a negative effect on the economy." Once again, you failed to elaborate. How is China's government sliding back towards authoritarianism? Recently since March 2024, China implemented VISA-free travel for passport holders from 12 countries: Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Malaysia, Switzerland, Ireland, Hungary, Austria, Belgium and Luxmbourg. All in bid to boost international tourism to China, so how's China moving away from freedom and towards authoritarianism? Is implementing VISA-free travel to 12 countries considered sliding back to authoritarianism? In fact, according to the government, the number of foreigners entering China in the first half of 2024 leaped by more than 150%.
    1
  20548.  @Darkademic  "China is a great example of what economic freedom can do. For clearer examples you can simply compare North Korea with South Korea," Initially, North Korea was actually more prosperous than South Korea, both militarily as well as economically. After WWII, South Korea was arguably one of the poorest countries in the world, with a per capita income of just US$72, (lower than sub-Saharan African countries.) At that time, North Korea was the greater economic and military power on the peninsula due to the North's history of heavy industries such as the power and chemical plants, and the large amounts of economic, technical and financial aid it received from other countries such as the Soviet Union, East Germany and China. It's because North Korea was slapped with US sanctions that stymied its economic growth, while at the same time, the US was also pouring economic aid into its neighbor, South Korea. Between 1946 and 1960, the United States provided Korea with economic and military aid in excess of $4.2 billion, with all but $45 million of this in the form of grants. South Korea's economy did not take off until after this period.
    1
  20549.  @Darkademic  "or West Germany with East Germany," East Germany did conduct trade with West Germany. The reason why West Germany was more successful was because Western Europe sought not to repeat the mistakes that led up to the rise of the Nazi party after WW1, so they did not impose harsh war reparations on West Germany who's under their wing. However, the Soviet Union had suffered the most casualties out of WWII (more than even China's) so they understandably sought war reparations from East Germany who's under their wing.
    1
  20550.  @Darkademic  "or even China with Taiwan, the latter being significantly richer largely due to adopting free markets sooner and to a greater extent." When the Kuomintang (KMT) lost the mainland to the CPC and fled to Taiwan island, their leader Chiang kai-Shek had transferred China's gold reserves from Shanghai to Taipei. Estimates of how much was moved differ between sources, ranging from between 3 million – 5 million taels (113.6 tons – 115.2 tons). In The Archives of Gold published in 2010, Dr Wu Sing-yung, outlines how his father (head of finance for the KMT government) helped to mastermind the operation that saw over 4 million taels of gold be moved from Shanghai to Taiwan. - Source: How one man took China’s gold This meant that Taiwan had a head start with its economy with gold reserves, whereas mainland China had its gold reserves taken elsewhere. Taiwan was also largely untouched by the war, while mainland China was in ruins after the war and had to pick up the pieces.
    1
  20551.  @Darkademic  "Socialism means complete and direct control by the government of all aspects of the economy, which China clearly does not have." Yeah, but you specifically said China "abandoned" socialism, which clearly isn't true. Socialism is still enshrined within China's core principles, just with the Chinese characteristics as an addendum. If it were abandoned then China would be 0% socialist isn't it? But even you admitted that's not the case. You said: "It has more government oversight in some areas (e.g. your IP example)," To further clarify, China's government doesn't control the IP of foreign companies, it merely sets up conditions for foreign companies wishing to set up shop in China. Every country have their own rules of doing business, and ultimately, it boils down to each companies choice on whether they agreed to the conditions of transferring tech or partnering with local Chinese company.
    1
  20552.  @Darkademic  "Make up your mind. On the one hand you are claiming that China is socialist (which is authoritarian by definition - both equate to government control)," Did I ever claimed that China is socialist? Could you quote me my words claiming that China is socialist? I mentioned that China did not abandon socialism, and that it remains one of the government's core principles, but when did I ever said China is socialist? In fact, the closest is you claiming (and I quote your words): "China is maybe around 50-55% socialist." Also, you're the one constantly claiming China's government is becoming more authoritarian without actually citing examples. You said: "I already gave examples (tech crackdowns etc.), and one relatively unimportant counter-example regarding visas doesn't invalidate the point." You did no such thing. This is the first time I'm hearing you mention tech crackdowns. Also, how's China announcing VISA free travels to 12 countries unimportant? It shows China is becoming more free and making it easier for foreign tourists to visit the country at the very least.
    1
  20553.  @Darkademic  "Seems like you're being deliberately obtuse here. You can obviously live twice as long without changing your quality of life." You're quoting an unrelated example that doesn't apply to Africa. In Africa's case, the people didn't up to 30 because "they were rich and living exactly how they want" as you put it. The people lived short lives because of widespread hunger, disease, war, and other factors that clearly reducing their quality of life. Nowadays, more Africans have access to food, clean water, healthcare that is helping them live longer lives. Even though Africa's problems haven't been completely eliminated, the fact that Africans are living longer is due to an increase in their quality of life. "and the rise in life expectancy is just one of the things that coincides with the rise of capitalism which began in the 1800s." But the greatest increase in life expectancy occurred not in the 1800s, but in the 1900s with the founding of the Soviet Union (1930) and the People's Republic of China (1949). The proof is that the Rest (orange line) has the steepest gradient from 1900-2000 compared to the West (light blue line). "The increase in life expectancy around the world is a side-effect of capitalism" Once again, the greatest increase in life expectancy occurred from 1900-2000 (as shown in your graph) which when Soviet Union and China were founded. "The proportion of the world population China accounts for is irrelevant." China's population makes up 20% of the world's population, how is it irrelevant?
    1
  20554.  @Darkademic  "Countries became rich, scientific breakthroughs were made, and these filtered through to the entire world." Speaking of scientific breakthroughs, the Soviet Union made several advances in science and technology, like for example launching the world's first satellite, Sputnik into orbit in 1957. The first man in space was Soviet Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin and the first space station was the Soviet Salyut. Yet it seems as though all those Soviet inventions are seemingly ignored by you, when it's apparent that the Soviet Union is capable of innovation and technological advancement.
    1
  20555.  @Darkademic  Earlier you wrote "or even China with Taiwan, the latter being significantly richer largely due to adopting free markets sooner." When the Kuomintang (KMT) lost the mainland and fled to Taiwan island, Generalissimo Chiang kai-Shek began transferring Shanghai's gold reserves to Taipei. Estimates of how much was moved differ between sources, ranging from between 3 million – 5 million taels (113.6 tons – 115.2 tons). In The Archives of Gold published in 2010, Dr Wu Sing-yung, outlines how his father (head of finance for the KMT government) helped to mastermind the operation that saw over 4 million taels of gold be moved from Shanghai to Taiwan. This meant Taiwan had capital to kickstart its economy, while mainland China had its gold reserves taken. Worst was that Taiwan wasn't as badly affected by WWII as mainland China, which was devastated after the war with Japan. Mainland China also had a larger population of people to lift out of poverty than the population of Taiwan. You said: "If China had done the same I have no doubt it would've surpassed the United States by now." Is there a deadline for China to "surpass" the United States? China will get there eventually and even though China's GDP (nominal) is the world's 2nd largest, China is already the largest economy if you go by GDP (PPP).
    1
  20556.  @Darkademic  Earlier you wrote "or even China with Taiwan, the latter being significantly richer largely due to adopting free markets sooner." When the Kuomintang (KMT) lost the mainland and fled to Taiwan island, Generalissimo Chiang kai-Shek began transferring Shanghai's gold reserves to Taipei. This meant Taiwan had capital to kickstart its economy, while mainland China had its gold reserves taken. Worst was that Taiwan wasn't as badly affected by WWII as mainland China, which was devastated after the war with Japan. Mainland China also had a larger population of people to lift out of poverty than the population of Taiwan. You said: "If China had done the same I have no doubt it would've surpassed the United States by now." Is there a deadline for China to "surpass" the United States? China will get there eventually and even though China's GDP (nominal) is the world's 2nd largest, China is already the largest economy if you go by GDP (PPP).
    1
  20557. If all of Taiwan's TMSC wafer fabrication gets relocated to Arizona, that means that the island is of no further interest to the United States, and the US is unlikely to intervene if conflict breaks out in the Taiwan Strait.
    1
  20558. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  20559. @Red Disaster Isn't President Trump transforming America into communist country now? By signing a 2 trillion dollars ($2,000,000,000,000) package giving everyone money? Or what about when Trump enacted the Defense Production Act to force companies like General Motors to build ventilators?
    1
  20560. @Red Disaster Even before the coronavirus outbreak, China made about half of the world's face masks. 2 months later, China churns out over 100 million masks per day, a fivefold increase. Video: Face mask shortage amid coronavirus pandemic reminds world of China's manufacturing dominance youtu.be/lSzbx6FTGzE Thousands of factories around the country now make masks and other protective gear, some only recently started production. The government gives subsidies, tax cuts, and interest-free loans to manufacturers. Chinese oil-refining giant Sinopec boosted production of raw materials for masks, setting up production lines in Beijing to make fabric for N95 respirators. The company behind China's J-20 stealth fighter jets adapted a production line for masks.
    1
  20561.  @Elephantstonica  Here's a video inside Chinese BYD mask factory and do people step on masks? Video: China: Factory produces 5 million masks a day in bid to supply shortfall youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw?t=17
    1
  20562. @Red Disaster This factory in the eastern Chinese city of Rizhao (日照) has been busy pumping out 3,000,000 masks a day. Video: Inside China's Biggest Mask Factory youtu.be/Gc074FxOBA4?t=11
    1
  20563. @Red Disaster "神州 Shenzhou Wow, you sure change the subject very quickly." Weren't we talking about China being capitalist not communist? So why I bring up China's manufacturing capabilities? Chinese manufacturers were given subsidies, tax cuts and interest-free loans. Whereas President Trump just signed a trillion dollar bill to inject cash into affected people's accounts.
    1
  20564. @Red Disaster Video: Ultra-high-speed Mask Production Line Put into Use in south China City youtube.com/watch?v=_jWt-4YKBq4
    1
  20565. @Red Disaster Most face masks are Made-in-China and the USA urgently needs Chinese masks during this difficult period. Source: The U.S. Needs China’s Masks, as Acrimony Grows nytimes.com/2020/03/23/business/coronavirus-china-masks.html American front-line medical personnel are running desperately short of masks and protective equipment as they battle the coronavirus outbreak. China, already the world’s largest producer of such gear by far, has ramped up factory output and is now signaling that it wants to help.
    1
  20566.  @omnipotent3309  Gautama Buddha was actually born in what constitutes modern day Nepal not India.
    1
  20567.  @omnipotent3309  About the Silk Road, ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by the rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china) which were in great demand throughout the ancient world. Take Han Chinese traditional clothing Hanfu (汉服) for example and it has 5,000 years of history and even the Japanese Kimono and Korean Hanbok clothing have their origins in Chinese Hanfu. Video: Beautiful Traditional Costume: Han Chinese Clothing (Hanfu) youtu.be/T6CucJxiWec?t=5 So it's thanks to the demand for Chinese silk that the Silk Road came into existence.
    1
  20568.  @omnipotent3309  Chinese silk was even found on the hair of an Egyptian mummy dating to about 1000 BC. Source: New Finds Suggest Even Earlier Trade on Fabled Silk Road nytimes.com/1993/03/16/science/new-finds-suggest-even-earlier-trade-on-fabled-silk-road.html
    1
  20569.  @omnipotent3309  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  20570.  @LaRoucheisright  Do you not think that perhaps the Coronavirus was another plague sent by your God in Heaven above, to torment humans on Earth in 2020?
    1
  20571.  @LaRoucheisright  Even in the Holy Bible, it is written that your God is spiteful and sent plagues of locusts, frogs, diseases and even rain of fire upon mankind, the children that He supposedly loves, so why is it unfathomable to think that Covid-19 is another one of His plagues sent to torment mankind?
    1
  20572.  @KIMJUNGEUNism  Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong can't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he'll wish for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    1
  20573.  @Quarksi  Block out flags? Every country have certain sensitive issues which they can't talk about in public. For example, if you wave Nazi Swastika Flag (outside of historical context) in countries like Germany, France and Austria, then you might get arrested by police. The Communist Hammer and Sickle Flag is also banned in those former Soviet Union countries like Ukraine, Lithuania, Czech Republic, etc. Source: Bans on Nazi Symbols wikipedia.org/wiki/Post%E2%80%93World_War_II_legality_of_Nazi_flags Source: Bans on Communist Symbols wikipedia.org/wiki/Bans_on_Communist_symbols Therefore, every country has limitations on freedom of speech and China is no different in this regard. And just because you can dishonor your own country by saying f**k America, then why should I do the same to my own country? Why don't you as Caucasian American go to those ghettos and approach a group of African Americans and use the N-word on them? See what consequences happen. And who says accessing YouTube while in China is breaking the law? Nobody will come arrest you for logging on to YouTube while in China. Which person has been arrested for doing so?
    1
  20574.  @Quarksi  What's wrong if a country chooses to ban a certain flag? My main point is that every country has their own set of laws on which flags or symbols being banned so what's your point then? And why are you constantly bringing Taiwan up into this discussion? I never compared Taiwan to Nazism, you're just putting words in my mouth that's all. And even in UK, a man was arrested for hanging Nazi flag in Neath, Wales. Source: Man arrested after swastika flag displayed in Neath itv.com/news/wales/2019-08-15/man-arrested-after-swastika-flag-displayed-in-neath/ Multiple people arrested over 2017 white nationalist rally in Charlottesville: A Caucasian nationalist carries a Nazi flag during a protest in Charlottesville bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2018/10/02/multiple-people-arrested-over-white-nationalist-rally-charlottesville/9rOBv5AWj4ZVbCWpZrrKXM/story.html Communist Symbols are banned in certain countries and you can get arrested for waving the flag. Scuffles broke out in several Ukrainian cities between people attending Victory Day events – some of whom carried banned communist flags or even symbols of Moscow-backed separatists fighting in eastern Ukraine – and nationalists who essentially regard the Soviet period as one of Russian occupation. Source:_ Ukraine police arrest dozens at tense Victory Day events_ irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/ukraine-police-arrest-dozens-at-tense-victory-day-events-1.3076865 A Russian court has ordered house arrest for four Muscovites accused of hanging a Ukrainian flag from a Soviet-era star atop a building near the Kremlin. Source: Four Russians Under House Arrest For Ukrainian Flag Stunt rferl.org/a/russia-skyscraper-ukrainian-flag/26544528.html But in China, you can wave the Communist Hammer and Sickle Flag freely without consequences. So every country have different levels of freedom and China is no exception.
    1
  20575.  @Quarksi  What's wrong with assuming your race? Didn't you yourself assume that I'm from mainland China, so why can't I make my own assumptions then? Most likely I'm right and you are Causasian American, but you just don't want to admit it that's all. And how on earth is it nationalistic for an American to say "F**K America"? You know one reason why America is apparently in decline? Because Americans aren't patriotic, you can dishonor your own country (even encouraged to do so) and any expressions of American patriotism is oftentimes mocked by other Americans. But China is growing stronger, because of Chinese nationalism, because Chinese people generally want China to become better and better. Isn't nationalism the glue that binds a people's country together? Earlier you only said "without any consequences" so when did I ever said anything about "consequences and government authority" are one and the same? And the consequence is that many African Americans will get offended by someone of non-African descent using the N-word against them and some may even retaliate with violence against such people. So there are consequences to "free speech" after all isn't? I never the cconsequences and government authority" are one and the same. YouTube is blocked in China yes, but its not breaking the law to access YouTube while in China. Which person has been arrested for logging onto YT while in China you tell me? Chinese companies like CGTN, CCTV, New China TV, etc can access YouTube, sometimes who says that accessing YouTube while in China is breaking the law?
    1
  20576.  @YinZhiLong  You didn't specify which type of blackout you were referring to. And MTR reserves the right not to release footage from its CCTV cameras and it can only release them to the proper authorities. A company representative told lawmaker Mo via WhatsApp: “Generally speaking, CCTV footage would be kept for 28 days according to our established rules and procedures. Only authorised persons may view them. In any event, many CCTVs have been damaged earlier on that night.” Source: hongkongfp.com/2019/09/06/hong-kong-lawmaker-protesters-demand-cctv-footage-police-storming-mtr-station/ Mo added that she was told the MTRC would turn over its surveillance footage if there was a court order to do so. In the meantime, lawmakers were not allowed to watch it because they do not fall under the category of “authorised persons.” I mean, Hong Kongers often pride themselves of following the Rule of Law, isn't it? So isn't MTR not realising the footage to authorised person, clearly following rule of law? And I find it hilarious that Hong Kong rioters are smashing CCTV security cameras or vandalising them with spray paints, and yet they still demand CCTV footage be released? How to release footage when the cameras are destroyed or vandalised you tell me?
    1
  20577.  @YinZhiLong  Ask the Hong Kong government to fix the problem? This whole Hong Kong protests started because of the Hong Kong Extradition bill, and as far as I know, Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam has formally withdrawn the HK extradition bill, yet the Hong Kong protests still continue? And Carrie Lam has clearly said that she is open to dialogue but the protestors aren't, and they refuse to talk this out peacefully. So how to solve the problem you tell me? The extradition bill is already withdrawn, yet the HK protestors still continue? Hong Kong Police have to be deployed to deal with the protestors and rioters, so how to spare the manpower, the time and resources to conduct an investigation you tell me? Almost every day, Hong Kong Police Department are all tied up with dealing with the HK protestors. Why don't you ask the Hong Kong protestors to stop their protests, so Hong Kong Police can look into the matter?
    1
  20578.  @Quarksi  At 2:19 the Japanese and Republic of China flags were allegedly removed from Tom Cruise's Top Gun movie trailers. And its just a movie, (a work of fiction) so yes, it's a WORLD different from actual events in the real world. Why get so riled up over a piece of fiction and compare it to the real world? So since you agreed that Communist Flags are banned in those countries because they are part of their past, then why can't People's Republic of China 🇨🇳ban the earlier Republic of China flag 🇹🇼, since they were part of China's past from 1912-1949, before the communists came to power in 1949? Why apply the double standards here for the former communist countries and China? Here is Ukrainian getting sentenced for wearing T-shirt with Soviet Symbol Source: Ukrainian gets suspended sentence for T-shirt with Soviet symbol khpg.org/en/index.php?id=1572221946
    1
  20579.  @Quarksi  "We're specifically talking about having the freedom to participate in an activity that China is against." What does that even mean? If you want to commit crimes like robbing banks, murdering people, etc, then China is clearly against such activities so why would China permit these activities?
    1
  20580.  @Quarksi  Since you're so obsessed with different "freedoms" then in many states of America, it is illegal to carry an open bottle or can of alcoholic beverage in hand out in public. The cops will arrest you if they catch you in public with open container of alcoholic drink in hand. You are allowed to do this in China, you know. Drink out in public in front of the police even.
    1
  20581.  @YinZhiLong  Who broke the CCTV cameras if not the Hong Kong rioters? So much footage of HK rioters destroying CCTV camera, traffic lights, and so on, yet the Hong Kong protestors demand footage from MTR? MTR spokesperson already said that they would release the footage only to authorised personnel so why blame MTR for following rule of law, when the HK rioters aren't? Carrie Lam tried to hold a dialogue, but the HK protestors refused listen to reason and deny any chances of dialogue happening so who's fault is it? And once again, how to address the issue of police brutality when the Hong Kong Police are all tied up with the ongoing protests you tell me? How to interview HK policemen when they are so busy? Why don't you tell the HK protestors to stop protesting so Hong Kong Police can begin to look into the matter? HK Police is not going to waste time on investigation when they constantly have to maintain public order in Hong Kong because of ongoing protests. And Hong Kongers would have the chance to talk to Lam but the dialogue was distracted by HK protestors disrupting her speech so how to talk? Carrie Lam is willing to talk but the HK protestors aren't.
    1
  20582.  @YinZhiLong  Hong Kong Carrie Lam has formally withdrawn the HK extradition bill, yet the Hong Kong protests still continue for what? Hong Kong extradition bill was proposed because of a certain incident. Some Hong Kong guy named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death and stuff her body in her suitcase, before flying back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice, but Hong Kong realised that there's no existing HK extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. That's why Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to HK extradition bill, to cover up this legal loophole. Do the Hong Kong protestors even know what they are protesting about? Have they even read the bill and understood its contents in their entirety?
    1
  20583.  @Quarksi  So your assumption was correct, then why can't I make assumptions about your race then? The fact that you refuse to confirm my assumption proves that you are at the most, probably not of African American descent. And I pointed out that saying the N-word has consequences against certain ethnic groups so why are you trying to link it to govern authority? I never said that the use of the N-word results in consequences by your government, I merely pointed out that "consequences" will most likely happen that's all. And since you acknowledged that saying f**k America is unpatriotic for an American, then why should China stoop to be your level? You hate your country, its your business, why expect Chinese to hate our country then?
    1
  20584.  @Quarksi  Since America can ban public drinking and open bottle/can of alcoholic beverages, then why can't China ban certain issues as well? I've already shown that ever country have their own definitions of freedom and so on, so why do you keep attempting to impose your American "freedoms" on China? China is not America so why do we have to follow your definition of freedom? China's political system has shown to be viable for our country so is there a need to liberalise like the West? Granted, the Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, Europe, USA and India. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  20585.  @YinZhiLong  She doesn't want to jump to conclusions about police brutality, without proper confirmation. And eventually Carrie Lam has withdrawn the Hong Kong extradition bill, so why are the Hong Kong protests still continuing, even after the bill is withdrawn? Not address any issue? Which issue did the protestors ask her during the dialogue you tell me? The Hong Kong extradition bill has already been withdrawn, so haven't Carrie Lam already address one issue already? Then why the HK protests still continue? And how to launch a police investigation into the matter, when Hong Kong protests are still ongoing? It's clear that no matter what Carrie Lam does, Hong protestors will not be satisfied, even were she to launch investigation into police brutality, the HK protests will still continue. And Carrie Lam's resigning does not solve the problem, it only exacerbates the situation. Carrie Lam started this whole problem with the extradition bill, so she should remain in power and solve this problem she started herself, instead of taking the easy way out by resigning.
    1
  20586.  @Quarksi  1. You assumed that I'm from the mainland, after I said that I'm Chinese. It's possible that I could have been overseas Chinese, but your assumption that I am mainland Chinese turned out to be right after all. And the fact that you chosen not to reveal your race add credence to the fact that my assumption is probably correct, that you are Caucasian American, because whether your race matters to whether you can apply the N-word to someone of African descent in America. 2. Yes I brought up the N-word as an example of restriction of free speech, because it clearly is a restriction of some sort and there are consequences to using the word in appropriately. You only mentioned "consequences" not government authority so how am I wrong then? 3. You said the "f**k America in itself isn't patriotic" so what's your point then? You can have your own opinions and assumptions, then why can't I have mine? 4. And for all your talk of freedom of speech, what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  20587.  @YinZhiLong  Carrie Lam has clearly formally withdrawn the HK extradition bill, yet the Hong Kong protestors still continue protesting for what? And she is open to dialogue so why don't the protestors talk this over with Carrie Lam over dialogue, instead of protesting? This is their chance to speak face to face with Carrie Lam, but they refuse to talk, only to make more unreasonable demands. And how to conduct actual investigation into HK police brutality when the Hong Kong protests are still ongoing you tell me? Hong Kong Police has their hands full dealing with the HK protestors and rioters, so how to spare the manpower, the time and resources to look into the matter? And you never answer any of my questions put before you, yet you want me to answer your question? I already explained so much, that the MTR spokesperson is not authorised to release footage, except to authorised personnel, that the HK rioters destroy CCTV cameras and spray paint over security cameras, so how to obtain footage of the events in MTR station? Majority of the Hong Kong protestors are high school kids who haven't even graduated from school yet they already think they know how to best govern Hong Kong? Their teenage minds haven't even matured and they haven't even stepped out into the real working world of adults, yet they already gotten swept up by political fervor. Look at the rest of Hong Kong's 7 million people and they aren't protesting. Working adults send their kids to school and go to work, and continue life as normal. These are the real Hong Kong people supporting HK economy, while the HK rioters are destroying the city that their parents and grandparents worked hard to build.
    1
  20588.  @Quarksi  Who are you to dictate what topic is to be discussed? The original topic is about Hollywood and Hong Kong but you just said to me that "However, considering you're from china it's probably illegal for you to consider any alternative possibility" so why you can suddenly switch the topic to mainland China? And I never said that social consequence is the same as governmental consequences. Look at your words "I'm an american and I can freely say" f**k America" whether I mean it or not, without any consequences" and no where did you ever said anything about social consequences or government consequences. Just "consequences" that's all. So clearly, mentioning the N-word has "consequences" depending on your race and who you uttered it to, so once again, how am I wrong? And who says China prevents citizens from expressing dissenting opinions? China sees an average of 500 protests daily, espousing a wide variety of grievances, including corruption, forced evictions, unpaid wages, human rights abuses, environmental degradation, ethnic protests, petitioning for religious freedom and civil liberties, protests against one-party rule, as well as nationalist protests against foreign countries. In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010. (or an average of 493 protests every day in 2010) I mean, have you ever been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? Then why do you claim that Chinese people aren't free you tell me? And your assumption that I'm mainland Chinese has proven to be correct, but if you refuse to disclose your race then I can't prove my assumption that you are Caucasian. Judging from your reactions, it's highly likely that you are Caucasian American, but just refuse to disclose it. And how is it considered racist to assume that you are Caucasian American because only Caucasians are the only Americans to disagree with me? I never said such a thing, I only use Caucasian in my N-word example became because it is clearly a race-related example that's all. Why are you jumping to conclusions and calling me racist because of your assumption that only Caucasian Americans disagree with me? I never said that at all. And to finish up, have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  20589.  @YinZhiLong  Hey, I use logic to argue my points, like MTR reserving the right not to release footage to unauthorised personnel. The HK rioters smash up CCTV cameras and still demand MTR release footage? So many foreign journalists are filming the HK protests so what more coverage do they need from MTR you tell me? So many people have camera phones, yet you're calling it total info blackout? And my point regarding police investigation still stands, how to conduct investigations when Hong Kong Police have their hands full with the ongoing protests? How to spare the manpower, the time, energy and resources to look into the matter, when HK police have to deal with the HK protests You're the disgrace, you never addressed any of my issues I brought up, yet you still want me to answer your question? Who do you think you are? I gave appropriate responses to all your points and refuted them, you gave nothing at all. Carrie Lam has already withdrawn the bill, yet the Hong Kong protests still continue for what? She's open to dialogue but the protestors aren't even willing to talk this over like civilised people, only making demands that's all. That's not a two-sided dialogue, that's only one-sided demands that's all.
    1
  20590.  @YinZhiLong  Here I found this source saying that over 800,000 people in Hong Kong have pledged support for the SAR government’s plan to amend the city’s extradition laws, according to a citywide signature campaign. 822,960 people had signed up by midnight to back the government’s move to revise the Fugitive Offenders and the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters ordinances in Hong Kong Source: Over 800,000 in HK vow to back extradition bill chinadailyhk.com/articles/33/153/153/1560136350237.html And you talk about police violence then what about rioter violence? Those Hong Kong rioters resort to violence, arsonism, vandalism, hurling petrol bombs, breaking building windows, security cameras, traffic lights and damaging Hong Kong MTR stations, setting shops on fire and planting improvised explosive devices (IEDs). There was even an police officer stabbed in the neck. Source: Police officer stabbed in the neck in latest Hong Kong clashes telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/10/13/police-officer-stabbed-neck-latest-hong-kong-clashes/
    1
  20591.  @YinZhiLong  They barely show to pro-Beijing rallies, because they have to work (which was exactly what I said earlier, yet you called me sick human being?) and if they are working, then why should police beat up these law abiding Hong Kong citizens? Another question? Why not answer my first questions posed to you? And Carrie Lam is holding dialogue with residents, so why don't the protestors take this opportunity to talk this over like civilised people? Source: Chief executive had begun meeting with different groups in attempt to find way to solve civil unrest scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/3031873/hong-kong-leader-carrie-lams-dialogue-residents-doubt-after Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor has, however, not given up on meeting groups of Hongkongers as a way of resolving the increasingly violent unrest gripping Hong Kong, although the chances of those sessions continuing are dwindling, the insiders say.
    1
  20592.  @YinZhiLong  Excuse me? You're accusing me of cherry picking? I have covered a whole range of topics from MTR's right to not to release footage to any unauthorised persons, to HK rioters smashing MTR CCTV cameras, yet demanding footage from MTR, to Hong Kong Police unable to spare the manpower, time, energy and resources to conduct an investigation, since they got their hands full dealing with the protests. I even explained how the Hong Kong Extradition bill was proposed because of HK murderer killing his pregnant girlfriend in Taiwan and then fleeing to Hong Kong to avoid extradition. And Carrie Lam already withdrawn the bill so what the Hong Kong protestors still protesting about you tell me? Chances are, even if she does manage to pull off an investigation, the HK protestors will still continue protesting. Instead of two-sided dialogue, its more like one-side making demands and ceding nothing in return. How can you call this a dialogue then? You're the one cherry-picking here. You only focus on one issue, and ignore the bigger picture. You're literally a walking bag of hypocrisy.
    1
  20593.  @YinZhiLong  Do you have actual confirmation that the yellow object they allegedly kick is a human? If not, then why jump to conclusions? You complain that I cherry-pick, but look at you, ignoring the bigger picture and cherry-picking yourself on a single issue. You're a walking bag of hypocrisy, accusing others of cherry-picking when you yourself are doing it.
    1
  20594.  @burg2740  说了那么多废话，你到底想说什么呀？
    1
  20595.  @Rasyad95  All the information from my sources are freely available online on the web, so what's wrong with responding to people's comments? And people like ebolmao even complained that I "left everything else without an answer".
    1
  20596.  @irrelevant9424  "神州 Shenzhou Be quiet you dog eating Han!" What about British eating rabbit stew? Or the French eating horse meat and snails?
    1
  20597.  @jimjeff9852  Who says they don't have homes? Don't you see all the neighborhoods in Xinjiang? Who's living in those houses if not Uighurs themselves?
    1
  20598.  @danefox7975  Glad to hear that at least someone else is interested in the kid's security.
    1
  20599.  @LancesArmorStriking  The barbed wire fence is only added recently, because many of these schools are kindergartens are newly built. Simple explanation isn't it? Xinjiang is hardly associated with India (Tibet is closer and forms a longer boundary with India) and Xinjiang has been part of China long before Islam itself was born. Only later did the Islamic invaders conquered the region and converted the natives to Islam.
    1
  20600.  @LancesArmorStriking  Why is free education not good? And American schools may not have barbed wire because Xinjiang region was prone to violence (like you admitted earlier yourself) so that's why barbed wires are needed in our schools and not American. Your arguments are literally tripping over themselves here. Not that there's any violence in American schools. Every now and then, some armed gunman in America will start going on a rampage and start shooting schoolkids. Source: Wikipedia: List of school shootings in the United States wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_school_shootings_in_the_United_States
    1
  20601.  @AnandKumar-ol2uw  There aren't "policemen every few meters." VICE News is trying to mislead you by painting as Xinjiang as a police state. The policemen are located at checkpoints and patrols are far apart, but VICE News intentionally edited its video to make it seem like they encountered policemen every few meters. Here is video clip of a streetwalk in Urumqi, China in 2019, and there are aren't even any policemen in the footage, despite walking for so long. Video: Urumqi, China Streetwalk 2019 youtube.com/watch?v=W-WguBtFA_w
    1
  20602.  @leonsong3284  干嘛骂粗话？
    1
  20603.  @Podcastclipsdaily7  What do you even know about kidnapping in China? As many as 200,000 boys and girls are kidnapped in China every year and sold openly online and child trafficking has been a long-standing problem in China. Source: dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2989404/Child-snatchers-abducting-200-000-boys-girls-openly-selling-online-10-000-kidnapping-epidemic-destroying-families-China.html As a Chinese, it makes my blood boil knowing that people in China kidnap children and sell them to other countries. These Uighur children in kindergartens present a tempting target for kidnappers so what's wrong with installing additional security measures like barbed wire to deter potential kidnappers you tell me? Prevention is better than cure, and erecting barb wires help provide a safe environment for Uighur children to learn, study and play.
    1
  20604.  @Runenut  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has seen the rise and fall of many other empires, and survived the violent passage of time to the modern day relatively intact, whereas even Republic of Rome eventually fell to barbarians.
    1
  20605.  @Runenut  African leaders are always welcome not to accept a Chinese loan. Its African leaders' choice after all and nobody point a gun at them and force them to borrow from Chinese banks. But without money, how are those African leaders going to develop their countries? You'll need capital if you want to kickstart your industrialization, and while other African countries are developing under Chinese loans, your country might be left behind if it doesn't industrialize to catch up and you may lose your legitimacy as a result of falling behind.
    1
  20606.  @yuh5294  I cite sources where possible to support my argument, so why do you think the government sent me here?
    1
  20607.  @benjieiv1541  When did I ever agree that Hong Kong is not part of China and that China has no claim over Taiwan? All I did was state China receiving tourists from parts of Asia that's all, so why are you putting words in my mouth? Also, you said "International Waters of South China Sea" but since when is South China Sea considered "international waters"? Look at Wikipedia: International Waters and the South China Sea clearly isn't considered international waters.
    1
  20608.  @Lu5ck  The police in Xinjiang can't afford to patrol the school perimeters all day (didn't I mention this point earlier?) so what's wrong with erecting barbed wire fences around our schools and kindergartens to protect against trespassers and kidnappers in Xinjiang?
    1
  20609.  @cx9882  China is imparting positive Chinese virtues, like being studious, industrious, competitive, etc, into these Uighur children in Xinjiang (whom are Chinese Citizens by birth, just check their Resident Identity Card) so what's wrong with teaching them Mandarin Chinese (world's most spoken language by number of speakers) and Chinese history? Don't American kids also learn English and American history as well? And who says that these boarding schools are "concentration camps"? Look at part 29:17 of the video and the little girl said that "only 13 students in her class live at school" which means that the the rest of her class doesn't live at school, so what makes you think it is a "concentration camp" then?
    1
  20610.  @cx9882  The Uighurs are not in school for 24/7. Reports by journalists have indicated that the students and parents are given the weekend off from school, and there are charted buses to take the Uighurs back to their villages (which may be remote, if its in an area as big as Xinjiang) And Xinjiang was part of China since long before Islam itself was born! Xinjiang was first referred to as "Xiyu" (Chinese: 西域) under the Han dynasty, which drove the Xiongnu out of the Tarim Basin in 60 BCE (Han–Xiongnu War) in an effort to build and secure the profitable Silk Road. Only later did the Islamic invaders conquered the region and converted the natives to Islam.
    1
  20611.  @cx9882  Here's a question, why doe Islam have such bad international image outside of Islamic countries? There are so many religions in the world like Buddhism, Taoism, Hinduism, Christianity, etc, but none are as associated with terrorism as Islam. I did not create this bad image, Islam brought it upon itself. What China is doing is removing the extremist elements from Islamic teachings in Xinjiang and providing them a proper Chinese education so that they'll grow up to be productive members of society, instead of being radicalized and flocking to join the terrorists, sacrificing their lives (and their bright future) by bombing the West and killing Westerners, all in the name of terrorist's causes. China is helping to do the rest of the world a favor by limiting the potential recruits by radical Islamic extremists.
    1
  20612.  @cx9882  Modern China was built by the sweat, blood, tears and sacrifice of Chinese people and our government to turn our once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into an economic powerhouse today, the world's factory (Made in China), a growing scientific and technological power, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under CCP leadership, which the Western anti-Communist propaganda been constantly denouncing all this while. Despite Western media demonizing China, China has been very successful under CCP leadership, so why continue to believe Western propaganda about China?
    1
  20613.  @cx9882  CCP did not move Han Chinese to Xinjiang to change the demographics of the region. East Asian migrants arrived in the eastern portions of the Tarim Basin about 3,000 years ago, while the Uygher peoples appeared after the collapse of the Orkon Uygher Kingdom, based in modern-day Mongolia, round about 842 CE. The Han Chinese of Xinjiang arrived at different times, from different directions and social backgrounds: They are descendants of criminals and officials who had been exiled from China proper during the second half of the eighteenth and first half of the 19th centuries; descendants of families of military and civil officers from Hunan, Yunnan, Gansu and Manchuria; descendants of merchants from Shanxi, Tianjin, Hubei and Hunan and descendants of peasants who started immigrating into the region in 1776. That was long before CCP even existed so why you claim CCP moved Han Chinese there to change the demographics?
    1
  20614.  @slepton9263  What if you were filming in a sensitive and restricted area in Canada, like along the perimeters of a military installation? Then Canadian policemen or security personnel will approach you if you behave suspiciously near such facilities isn't it?
    1
  20615.  @Lu5ck  "Few attacks"? Chinese people died in those attacks because of misguided Uighur terrorists, so why can't the government take measures to re-educate the Uighurs in Xinjiang? And if you think the West doesn't overreact, then what about USA invading Iraq, just because a few terrorists insurgents attacked USA during 9/11? Look at the number of Iraqi civilians killed because of US invasion of Iraq? The Iraq Body Count Project reported some 200,000 Iraqi civilians deaths, just because a few insurgents attacked USA. Source: Iraq Body Count Project iraqbodycount.org/ And lastly, Islam is not a race, so why are you calling us racist?
    1
  20616.  @cx9882  That was before CCP even existed, and it was Qing Dynasty that decided to resettle Han Chinese to Xinjiang. The Qing Dynasty was ruled by Manchu conquerors of China, (who conquered Ming Dynasty China) so why blame Han for what Manchu's did? Why did you say earlier that CCP moved Han chinese to region to change demography?
    1
  20617.  @junioradult6219  Today is the weekend so what's wrong with me posting here?
    1
  20618.  @summerrose1545  Here is picture of Owen School in Singapore and you can see the barbed wire above the school fencing. Source: https://owenprimary.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/sam_7074.jpg
    1
  20619.  @technomarket7459  我只是实话实说而已，而且我用照片来当证据。
    1
  20620.  @alexzarov7540  What's wrong with positivity? So many people only seem to know the negatives about China and Western anti-China propaganda have been "demonising" China and painting negative picture of China, so I'd thought that I enlighten others on China's positives that's all.
    1
  20621.  @ahmadfrankie3358  Here is picture example and it says "School Fencing with Barbed Wire," (Source: profence.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/School-Fencing-with-Barbed-Wire.jpg ) and it's rather common sight along most South East Asian Schools including Malaysia.
    1
  20622.  @ahmadfrankie3358  Kids separated from parents? The United States has deported more than 500 million parents as illegal immigrants and separated them from their kids according to this source: The U.S. has deported more than half a million parents since 2009. Here’s what happens to their kids. washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/09/21/this-is-what-would-happen-to-the-children-of-11-million-illegal-immigrants-if-president-trump-deported-them/
    1
  20623.  @jianeye  Here is Malaysian school Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Inanam and the U.S marines are helping paint a wall with barbed wire above it. Source: Students, City Hall and US Navy help brighten up school in Inanam dailyexpress.com.my/news.cfm?NewsID=131654 Here's another picture of Sailors, Marines Visit Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan High School dvidshub.net/image/5129249/sailors-marines-visit-sekolah-menengah-kebangsaan-high-school and you can clearly see the barbed wire school fence
    1
  20624.  @cam0987  If those Uighurs in Xinjiang become refugees in the Middle East, chances are that they'll get influenced by Islamic terrorist and sacrifice their lives for terrorist causes. But if they stay in Xinjiang, they will receive proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (world's most spoken language by number of speakers) Chinese history and graduate to become productive members of society, rather than throw away their bright future commuting terrorist acts.
    1
  20625.  @MrRedmer  Here is another video of Urumqi Xinjiang, China. Video: youtu.be/wd4i4sqGyV8 Xinjiang is flourishing today without the terrorists. And you yourself never been to Xinjiang, only your friends did, so why do you claim you have 1st hand account of Xinjiang? Which city in Xinjiang did you visit?
    1
  20626.  @rxijin7602  What's wrong with refuting comments 2 months ago? If people talk to me, then who are you to tell me not to reply to them? Who do you think you are?
    1
  20627.  @vinhhuynh5218  Your grandfather been to those reeducation centers in Xinjiang? Then why do you claim they are concentration camps for kids? In this Xinjiang schools, the Uighurs can take the weekend off to go visit their families and there are buses chartered to take them back to their remote villages in Xinjiang.
    1
  20628.  @vinhhuynh5218  Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China youtu.be/TtduKDpy4oc China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, as compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for fcenturies.*
    1
  20629.  @vinhhuynh5218  About Chinese Education, as of 2013 China has also become a top destination for international students and China is the world's 3rd most popular country for international students, according to Institute of International Education Source: China ranks 3rd among countries that host the most international students, IIE reports. usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/2013/10/08/explore-the-worlds-top-universities China is also the most popular destination in Asia for international students, surpassing other Asian destinations like Japan, Korea, India, Singapore, etc, in terms of sheer volume of international students.
    1
  20630.  @mhnpl8140  Xinjiang is not as developed as the rest of China so that's why they still need barbed wire. Just like your Vietnam schools need barbed wire for the same reason.
    1
  20631.  @mhnpl8140  Xinjiang is quite possibly 10 years behind the rest of China, so what's wrong with barbed wire school fences? I mean, you admitted that your country already had barbed wire school fences so what's fundamentally wrong with China having barbed wire on our school fences? LOL, Xinjiang is even more remote than Vietnam, it's the largest province in China after all, at 1,600,000 square kilometres. Vietnam is only 330,000 square kilometres in comparison, so what's wrong with introducing tighter security measures in Xinjiang? Its almost 5 times the area of Vietnam for crying out loud!
    1
  20632.  @sihyuanwu5492  Here is picture of Owen School in Singapore and you can see the barbed wire above the school fencing. Source: https://owenprimary.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/sam_7074.jpg
    1
  20633.  @rivvy2138  Barbed wire is necessity to protect our kids, no matter how "creepy" they look. For example in Yunnan, China, 51 children and 3 teachers were injured at a kindergarten when a man attacked them with a corrosive chemical. Source: Chemical attack at kindergarten in China injures 51 children edition.cnn.com/2019/11/12/asia/china-corrosive-liquid-kindergarten-intl-hnk/index.html The 23-year-old suspect surnamed Kong climbed into the school in Kaiyuan city, Yunnan province, on Monday afternoon and sprayed caustic soda on a room full of students and teachers. Imagine if that kindergarten in Yunnan had barbed wire fences instead. Then the attacker would have a harder time to conduct his chemical attack. Creepy or not, our kids personal safety should be the priority and that's why barbed wire installations are necessary in Xinjiang.
    1
  20634.  @rivvy2138  Source: The U.S. has deported more than half a million parents since 2009. Here's what happens to their kids washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/09/21/this-is-what-would-happen-to-the-children-of-11-million-illegal-immigrants-if-president-trump-deported-them/ At least in China, the Uighur parents and kids are still located in Xinjiang and they aren't separated from each other to the same extent as USA deporting parents. The Uighurs at school can even take the weekend off to be with their loved ones, and the schools have chartered buses to help take Uighurs back to their home villages during the weekends.
    1
  20635.  @phSyn  谁不懂英语啊？你看Barbed Wire在英语是什么东西。 Coppell city council members are expected to vote Tuesday night on a zoning request involving a chain link, barbed wire fence surrounding a middle school football field. Source: Divided Opinions on School's Barbed Wire Fence nbcdfw.com/news/local/Coppell-Wire-Fence_Dallas-Fort-Worth-410239375.html 所以我到底说错了什么？
    1
  20636.  @phSyn  你真的是马来西亚华人吗？你不知道你国家学校有Barbed wire吗？请你看清清楚楚下面的照片。 Here is Malaysian school Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Inanam and the U.S marines are helping paint a wall with barbed wire above it. Source: Students, City Hall and US Navy help brighten up school in Inanam dailyexpress.com.my/news.cfm?NewsID=131654 Here's another picture of Sailors, Marines Visit Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan High School dvidshub.net/image/5129249/sailors-marines-visit-sekolah-menengah-kebangsaan-high-school and you can clearly see the barbed wire school fence 我已经给你证据了但你还不信，那我还怎么办呢？
    1
  20637.  @rivvy2138  So you claimed USA does it legally? Then I can also say that China does it legally too, so what's your problem? Their country, their rules. Our country, our rules. The Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (world's most spoken language by number of speakers) Chinese history and singing patriotic songs about China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth and they learn English at school, American history and sing patriotic songs about America. Once these Uighurs graduate from school, they will be able to return to proper society as productive members, instead of being twisted by radical Islam and sacrificing their lives for terrorist causes.
    1
  20638. @Rume CizP What cages like animals? Theses are boarding schools where Uighurs receive their education and learning job skills necessary to prepare them for the workforce when they graduate, so why you label them as cages? Did you know that the Uighurs are given the weekend off and there are buses chartered to take them out of during weekend and back to their home villages (which may be remote in Xinjiang)?
    1
  20639.  @daisydaisy246  Which part of South East Asia do you live? I have previously shown examples of barbed wire school fences.
    1
  20640.  @daisydaisy246  Is there something wrong with replying to posts that are 5 months ago?
    1
  20641.  @daisydaisy246  Is there a time-limit to which, you are not allowed to respond to comments, once you cross it?
    1
  20642.  @daisydaisy246  Let me ask you; Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? Granted, the Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, Europe, USA and India. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  20643.  @daisydaisy246  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours.
    1
  20644.  @rivvy2138  What's your problem with China anyway? USA does education there way and China does education our way. The Uighurs in those boarding schools are given the weekend off and they can leave the premises to be at home with their loved ones. The schools even charter buses to take the Uighurs back to their home villages (which may be remote, especially in Xinjiang)
    1
  20645. @Rume CizP About Education in China, Chinese students scored highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment, or PISA. The test is given every three years to 15-year-olds around the world and measures their knowledge in reading, science and mathematics. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html The best-performing students in all three subjects were in China. They attend schools in and around Beijing and Shanghai, and two provinces: Jiangsu and Zhejiang.
    1
  20646.  @butternutyeeetsbanana.-.5389  1. What has my name even got to do with this discussion? Do you know the meaning of my name 神州 Shenzhou? I don't attack other people just because of their names. 2. China is performing well under communist party rule, so what's wrong with me pointing out China's achievements under the CCP? 3. Why don't you attack my points instead of accusing me of being watched?
    1
  20647.  @butternutyeeetsbanana.-.5389  Which of my points is a lie?
    1
  20648.  @AdnanKhan-yo7hf  Since when is YouTube banned in China? Nobody will come arrest you for logging on to YouTube while in China. Which person has been arrested for doing so?
    1
  20649.  @Lochness19  I already gave so many previous examples, why do you people keep ignoring my examples?
    1
  20650.  @hanacnadir824  Why are high schools designed like prisons? quora.com/Why-are-high-schools-designed-like-prisons Typical standard layout building of Public High Schools in Indonesia That’s front view of Public Senior High School 28 in Jakarta. Most public high schools in Indonesia are designed with building layout like that, having high fence and blockish building style. If you ask why high schools in Indonesia have high fences ? Well I don’t know. They have built high school with design like that since the proclamatin of Independence in 1945.
    1
  20651. @Santiago Rodriguez Newton "神州 Shenzhou No, that's not true at all. Taiwan has NO claims to the South China Sea" Source: Island or Rock? Taiwan Defends Its Claim in South China Sea nytimes.com/2018/05/20/world/asia/china-taiwan-island-south-sea.html
    1
  20652. @Santiago Rodriguez Newton "神州 Shenzhou Wait, youtube is banned in china?" Who said that YouTube is banned in China? Nobody will come arrest you for logging on to YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested for doing so?
    1
  20653. @Santiago Rodriguez Newton "神州 Shenzhou China is good at propaganda." Then why so many foreigners hate China, if our propaganda is allegedly that good? So many foreigners never even set foot in China yet Western anti-China propaganda has already made them hate a country they never been to.
    1
  20654. @Santiago Rodriguez Newton Chinese universities produce the most STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) out of any other country in the world. Countries With The Most STEM Graduates 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/02/02/the-countries-with-the-most-stem-graduates-infographic/ This implies that China is going to play a much larger role in the STEM fields, given the sheer number of graduates produced in these fields.
    1
  20655. @Santiago Rodriguez Newton Take ancient writing scripts for example and Chinese characters constitute the oldest continuously used system of writing in the world, having been used since 1200 BCE and today, Mandarin Chinese is the most spoken language in the world by number of speakers. Whereas other ancient scripts like Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia) Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered dead languages today, since they are no longer evolving with the times and no new words being added into their vocabulary. Video: 3,000 years on, China's oracle shed new light on evolution of script youtu.be/sbXD1nwHEAw Source: Chinese characters wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_characters
    1
  20656. @Santiago Rodriguez Newton 2018 PISA rankings for mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) 6. Japan (527) 7. Korea (526) 8. Estonia (523) 9. Netherlands (519) 10. Poland (516) ... 2018 PISA rankings for science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) 6. Japan (529) 7. Finland (522) 8. Korea (519) 9. Canada (518) 10. Hong Kong, China (517) 2018 PISA rankings for reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) 6. Canada (520) 7. Finland (520) 8. Ireland (518) 9. Korea (514) 10. Poland (512) ... Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    1
  20657. @Santiago Rodriguez Newton What makes you think they won't have access to resources? The Chinese government is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's highest R&D spending according to the following source: Countries by Research and Development spending 1. China ($553.4 billion) 2. United States ($511.1 billion) 3. European Union ($379.0 billion) 4. Japan ($165.7 billion) 5. Germany ($118.8 billion) 6. South Korea ($91.6 billion) 7. India ($66.5 billion) 8. France ($60.0 billion) 9. United Kingdom ($44.8 billion) 10. Russia ($42.6 billion) ... Source: List of countries by research and development spending wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending#List In the West, researchers often have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    1
  20658. @Santiago Rodriguez Newton "China is NOT known as a technologically advanced country" China is home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) and Tianhe-2 (天河-2) and in 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Video: Sunway TaihuLight named world's fastest supercomputer youtu.be/KEdsrT1mFAU Source: China surpasses US in supercomputers usage on Top500 list cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion).
    1
  20659. @Santiago Rodriguez Newton About Technology in China, China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    1
  20660. @Santiago Rodriguez NewtonAbout R&D, China publishes more scientific research papers than any other country in the world. For the first time, China has overtaken the United States in terms of the total number of science publications, according to statistics compiled by the US National Science Foundation (NSF). Source: China declared world’s largest producer of scientific articles nature.com/articles/d41586-018-00927-4 The agency’s report, released on 18 January, documents the United States’ increasing competition from China and other developing countries that are stepping up their investments in science and technology.
    1
  20661. @Santiago Rodriguez Newton About Technology in China, the government is investing in Artificial Intelligence systems, China recently unveiled the world's first AI news anchor. Video: World's first AI news anchor debuts in China youtu.be/MHPI1uH9llU Video: Xinhua unveils world's first female AI news anchor youtu.be/5iZuffHPDAw
    1
  20662.  @MarkYeung1  Russia has made it clear that it doesn't want NATO to expand eastward and that Ukraine shouldn't join NATO. In fact, many NATO countries also don't want Ukraine to join NATO, yet they can't but that down in writing because of pressure by the United States.
    1
  20663.  @MarkYeung1  The Beijing Olympics could possibly help as a cooling down period to hold off any potential hot conflict between Russia, Ukraine and NATO, at least until after the games are over. The problem is that the United States might possibly to sabotage the Beijing games by buying off other countries athletes to cause trouble. Only time will tell if this really happens during games. But in your original post, you wrote that "If China can prove to the West that it can allow democracy and freedoms (not just in mainland, but also in Hong Kong and Taiwan)." but why should China prove that? Those issues are China's domestic affairs, so China has nothing to prove to the West. It's the kind of "colonial mentality" by some people, thinking that China has prove something to the West, when we don't.
    1
  20664.  @MarkYeung1  If the Beijing Olympics buys time to postpone any potential hot conflict between Russia, Ukraine and NATO, then what more could you ask? China observes a policy of non-interference in other countries domestic affairs, then why are you claiming China can and should do more than that? Who knows, perhaps by the time the Beijing Olympics ends, the whole issue would have been forgotten.
    1
  20665.  @MarkYeung1  So since you agree that from a pure national point of view, China has NO legal responsibility to prove to any country, then why should China prove anything? You keep on claiming China needs to boost relations with other democratic countries, but if other democracies are unable to accept alternative forms of political systems then isn't it undemocratic of them? It's those people still suffering from "colonial mindset" that insist China should cater to Western imperialism. I mean, you keep on claiming democracy, but according to surveys by Harvard University and Ash Centre, around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. Whereas many so-called Western democracies are registering low trust in their governments, just look at the low approval ratings of US President Biden and UK PM Boris Johnson. If anything, isn't this an indication that such countries aren't democratic, because their leaders aren't delivering what the people want?
    1
  20666.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou you said the United States may sabotage the Beijing Olympics by buying off other countries athletes to cause trouble. Do you have any sources for this?" I read it on a Reuters article entitled: China says U.S. plans to pay athletes to 'sabotage' Beijing Games
    1
  20667.  @MarkYeung1  I have already explained that the Beijing Olympics could possibly help buy time for all parties to cool down, but you're just dismissing what China is doing and demanding that China do more. Who knows what the Russia/Ukraine situation will be like after the Beijing games? Also, you keep on claiming China needs to appease the West, but this is just the subservient thinking of people suffering from a "colonial mindset". Even after the colonies have been physically decolonised, the "decolonization of the mind" still needs to happen to heal the mental damage inflicted by colonization on the mindset of the colonized.
    1
  20668.  @MarkYeung1  Who is Liao Xiaopo?
    1
  20669.  @MarkYeung1  Do you mean perhaps Liu Xiaobo? Liu Xiaobo is a Chinese person who hates his own skin, and he blindly worship Western Imperialism. He put Western culture on a pedestal and is ashamed of Chinese culture. Liu strongly criticized Chinese intellectuals' "traditional attitude of searching for rationalism and harmony as a slave mentality" this is how much he despise his own Chinese culture.
    1
  20670.  @MarkYeung1  Liu Xiaobo kinda reminds me of you. His works indicate that he's suffering from the mental damage that the colonizer inflicts on the mindset of the colonized, and he was taught to despise his own Chinese culture and to wholeheartedly support Western imperialism at the expense of everything else. For example, in a 1988 interview with Hong Kong's Liberation Monthly (now known as Open Magazine), he said "modernization means wholesale westernization, choosing a human life is choosing a Western way of life. The difference between the Western and the Chinese governing system is humane vs in-humane, there's no middle ground ... Westernization is not a choice of a nation, but a choice for the human race." (that means he want's the entire human race to become westernized at the expense of local culture) This is exactly the sort of "colonial mindset" that some Chinese still suffer from. When asked what it would take for China to realize a true historical transformation, Liu Xiaobo replied: "[It would take] 300 years of colonialism. In 100 years of colonialism, Hong Kong has changed to what we see today. With China being so big, of course it would require 300 years as a colony for it to be able to transform into how Hong Kong is today. I have my doubts as to whether 300 years would be enough."
    1
  20671.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "There's no doubt that China cheat and stole from many countries." Western Imperialism has literally stolen entire continents. Western society is built upon the backs of African slavery, through causing genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, through brutal colonization of Asia (India, Hong Kong, Singapore, etc) and African countries, and plundering of resources like gold. Western society today is rich, because they're sitting on a pile of wealth that their ancestors took from America, Australia, Africa and Asia. The population demographics of entire continents have been irrevocably changed in the span of a few centuries.
    1
  20672.  @MarkYeung1  Why are you suddenly talking about Chairman Mao? I thought you were talking about Liu Xiaobo earlier, are you switching topics to Mao Zedong now? And Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. In 1958, the Yellow River flooded that coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. In July 1958, the peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 m3/s (790,000 cu ft/s) with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kg/m3 (57 lb/cu ft), 14× and 24× their mean annual values, respectively. The flood water level was so high that it rose up to the top of the levee in several places. This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. It was reported as the most severe flood since 1933. So how can you say for certain that weather is not the excuse?
    1
  20673.  @MarkYeung1  But this conversation wasn't about Chairman Mao, why are you suddenly talking about Mao? And when did I ever denied that mainland Chinese have strong positive and negative opinions about Mao? I've previously point out that Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought (such as the 1958 Yellow River flood) causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation, whereas you just ignored the weather factors completely.
    1
  20674.  @MarkYeung1  "And you're constantly in denial of even the Chinese government." You think everyone in China constantly agrees with the Chinese government, is that it? If anything, you're just proven that not everyone is a blind follower of the Chinese government.
    1
  20675.  @MarkYeung1  The Communist Party of China has actually acknowledged that Chairman Mao did more good for China than bad. Even in 1981, Deng Xiaoping acknowledged that Mao's contributions to the Chinese revolution far outweigh his mistakes, that his merits are primary and his errors secondary. According to Deng Xiaoping, Mao Zedong rendered indelible meritorious service in founding and building up the communist party and the Chinese liberation of the oppressed nations of the world and to the progress of mankind.
    1
  20676.  @MarkYeung1  Who says that I didn't acknowledge that Chairman Mao made mistakes? I never said that Chairman Mao was perfect, you were the one who made such assumptions of me.
    1
  20677.  @MarkYeung1  Who says that Chinese people twist the news and don't report objectively? Didn't we just shown that the Communist Party of China has actually acknowledged that Chairman Mao did more good for China than bad? Under Chairman Mao, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Under Mao, life expectancy at birth nearly doubled from 35-40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al. 1984; Coale1984; Jamison 1984; Banister 1987; Ravallion 1997; Banister and Hill 2004). Infant mortality rate under Mao was halved. Illiteracy rate under Mao was nearly halved. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%, and they have been steadily decreasing since. China’s literacy success has been described as “perhaps the single greatest educational effort in human history” (Peterson, 1997). But if I tell all these information to Westerners, most of them (not all) will just laugh at me, call me brainwashed, or a "communist party shill" without looking at the data objectively.
    1
  20678.  @MarkYeung1  Just yesterday or so, the Azov Battalion in Mariupol literally surrendered to Russian forces and are being evacuated to hospitals in Donetsk Republic. Are you saying these men and women who surrendered are traitors? Clearly Zelenskyy doesn't care about his people and his soldiers, he just orders them to fight to the death in a futile conflict with Russia.
    1
  20679. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20680. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  20681.  @knowitall5913  "神州 Shenzhou I'm Sorry, what is the meaning of your post." I asked did Cyrus censor any posts? And even if he did, YouTube clearly allows censorship.
    1
  20682.  @knowitall5913  "神州 Shenzhou 90% of attks on Asians is done by BLM supporters." What about the tragic Atlanta shooting of 8 people (6 of whom were Asian American women) was that perpetrated by BLM protestors? What about the elderly woman who was attacked by a man and retaliated such that the man had to taken to the hospital? How'd you know they are BLM protestors?
    1
  20683.  @chrishannis1  These guys are political prisoners? Cyrus Janssen is currently living in Canada, how's he a political prisoner? And China's political system has defied all expectations of failure and succeeded, transforming China from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into an economic juggernaut today, the world's factory (Made in China) protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. Yet you're calling China's political system a joke?
    1
  20684.  @chrishannis1  A trial with due process? Why has Meng Wanzhou arrested since Dec 2018 and its already 2021 and still her case has not concluded? After 3 years? What had Canadian police been doing for 3 years? No evidence, so they need time to fabricate evidence? And if you want to talk about prison populations then it's actually America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate
    1
  20685.  @chrishannis1  About the Social Credit System, many foreigners often complain Chinese people spit in public, smoke in non-smoking areas, jump queues, disobey traffic rules, jay walk, drive on wrong side of the road, speed through red lights, etc when not all Chinese people are like that. We Chinese feel embarrassed that such bad people represent China overseas, so the government introduce social credit system to discourage such bad behaviour and promote better behaviour instead. This is a meritocratic system where good behaviour is rewarded and bad behaviour penalised. But if such people persist with bad behaviour, until their scores fall to become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisances of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again.
    1
  20686.  @knowitall5913  So censorship does exist on YouTube after all? I had many anti-China people who often boasted there's freedom of speech on Western websites like YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, but clearly, censorship exists on these platforms.
    1
  20687.  @knowitall5913  So BLM supporters is code for "people who support ethnic minorities"? The Atlanta shooting of 8 people (6 were Asian American women) didn't seem like someone who supports ethnic minorities given that the families of Asian Americans now have dead family members thanks to the his actions.
    1
  20688. Government in China controls the corporations for China's benefit. Government in USA is controlled by the corporations for profit.
    1
  20689. If you look at their political systems, all four of them achieved rapid economic growth under authoritarian leadership of some form. The Kuomintang ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, jailing/purging political rivals (a period known as White Terror in Taiwan) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Yet under single-party KMT rule, Taiwan's economy flourished in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Singapore, even till today, has always been governed under a single-party (PAP) and Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore's founder) was a dictator who jailed/exiled his political rivals. Yet Singapore transformed from a sleepy fishing village nation into a world class country under the PAP. In Korea, South Korean dictator Park Chung-hee introduced economic reforms that eventually led to rapid economic growth and industrialization and was credited with the Miracle on the Han River (漢江의 奇蹟) although he also became increasingly authoritarian. Political opposition was constantly repressed and Park had complete control of the military, and much control over the media. Lastly, Hong Kong's rapid economic growth was achieved while it was still a British colony under authoritarian rule (before the 1997 handover and the One Country, Two Systems policy). This shows that not all countries/states have to adopt Western-style democracy to be successful and the Four Asian Dragons/Tigers are living proof of this.
    1
  20690. Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea and Hong Kong achieved these rapid economic growth under authoritarian single-party governments. Taiwan had been ruled by single-party KMT who imposed martial law in Taiwan for 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Singapore even till today has been governed by a single-party government (People's Action Party) and South Korea's economy flourished under the South Korean dictator Park Chung-hee. Lastly, Hong Kong's rapid economic growth was achieved while it was still a British colony under authoritarian rule (before the 1997 handover and the One Country, Two Systems policy). This shows that not all countries/states have to adopt Western-style democracy to be successful economically and the Four Asian Dragons/Tigers are living proof of this.
    1
  20691.  @MarkYeung1  "Look at how well North Korea is doing. Shenzhou's arguments were very strange." Because the USA imposed sanctions on North Korea and stymied its economic growth, while at the same time, pouring US aid into South Korea. After the Korean War North Korea was the greater economic and military power on the Korean peninsula due to the North's history of heavy industries such as the power and chemical plants, while South Korea was once one of the poorest countries at that time. "The United States’ $35 billion investment in economic foreign assistance has helped the Republic of Korea (ROK), once one of the poorest nations, become the world’s 12th largest economy." ... Source: (How U.S. Foreign Assistance Has Helped South Korea)_
    1
  20692.  @MarkYeung1  According to Human Rights Watch (Singapore): "Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations." - HRW Singapore ... Doesn't Singapore's political system sound very much like China's? So this EASTERN style of democracy you described is doesn't appear to fit in with the Western definition of democracy.
    1
  20693.  @MarkYeung1  "Hong Kong is not an independent country and China has a final say in their voting system." That's why I wrote "countries/states" just like how Taiwan is not an independent country too and together with Hong Kong, the two are part of China. Also, China's final say in Hong Kong is in accordance with Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45, which states: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." - Article 45, Hong Kong Basic Law Therefore, Beijing (aka Central People's Government) reserves the right to appoint the Chief Executive of Hong Kong and China is not violating Hong Kong Basic Law in the process. "The last 3 years (2020 to 2022) Hong Kong people were leaving in record numbers." Mainland China is home to the largest number of Hong Kong expatriates, more than any other region in the world, outside of Hong Kong.
    1
  20694.  @norincofan1949  "The determining factor was not whether the govts were authoritarian or not but whether they ruled for the people or for the wealthy comprador class within their borders." Agreed. You can have authoritarian systems which care for the ordinary people, and you can have Western-style democratic systems which cared for the wealthy classes. Yet Mark Yeung seems to think the worst of authoritarian systems, even though it worked for Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea and Hong Kong.
    1
  20695. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20696. +Hanna Kin No problem. Even though I am Chinese myself, I am still surprised that there are numerous foods in China that I have yet to try.
    1
  20697.  DSki Dski  What makes you think 4500 years of Chinese heritage is destroyed? China has many historical monuments like The Great Wall of China, Forbidden City, Qin Emperor Tomb, Terracotta Army, The Grand Canal (world's oldest and longest artificial river) and many more historical sites. Here's some videos of Chinese historical monuments. Video: The Great Wall of China in 4k - DJI Phantom 4 youtu.be/EotbKqZmBuY?t=20 Video: Forbidden City, Beijing, China in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/R9vcSWb6mug Video: Terracotta Army, Xian, China in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/VhIouznYlvo Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  20698. The United States is pretty much used to getting it's way in foreign affairs through military force, so when China comes along and instead of cowering, starts standing up to U.S tyranny, the U.S become unused to more diplomatic means of resolving disputes.
    1
  20699.  @eddyfong6486  Ukraine Army has been claiming to have shot down Russian aircraft, yet why is it they don't seem to produce any photos of downed Russian aircraft?
    1
  20700. @反共抗俄 Why are you speaking Russian to me?
    1
  20701. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China according to Taiwan's own constitution.
    1
  20702.  @fclp9713  Do you have evidence that the poll conducted Harvard University and Ash Center had communist party minders, since you're the one making the accusation here? Liu Xiaobo is one of those Chinese with a "colonial mindset", just blindly worshiping Anglo-Saxon Culture while harboring disdain for any non-white culture. From an interview he sai: "modernization means wholesale westernization, choosing a human life is choosing a Western way of life. The difference between the Western and the Chinese governing system is humane vs in-humane, there's no middle ground ... Westernization is not a choice of a nation, but a choice for the human race." In the same interview, Liu also criticised the TV documentary River Elegy, for not sufficiently criticising Chinese culture and not promoting westernisation enthusiastically enough.
    1
  20703.  @andrenogueira5058  As for the Taiwanese aboriginals, their ancestors were Austronesian farmers from Mainland China that arrived on Taiwan some 5,000 years ago. Around 3,000 BC, the Neolithic Dapenkeng culture abruptly appeared and quickly spread around the coast of the island. Their sites are characterised by corded-ware pottery, polished stone adzes and slate points. The inhabitants cultivated rice and millet, but were also heavily reliant on marine shells and fish. Most scholars believe that this culture is from mainland China in origin and was brought across the strait to Taiwan.
    1
  20704.  @andrenogueira5058  It doesn't have to be that way. China is flexible enough to allow multiple political systems (i.e communist and democratic) to exist within our borders as long as the fact remains that they are part of China. For example, President Xi has offered to extend the One Country, Two Systems policy to include Taiwan as well, permitting them to keep their own separate government, keep their elections, their currency, passport, even keep their military, while Taiwan will be considered reunified with the mainland. (P.S It would be as though North Korea and South Korea both agree to unify as a single country, Korea, while simultaneously allowing both sides to keep their respective governments) Yet the former Taiwan President Ma rejected President Xi's offer, and they've not offered a counter proposal for reunification.
    1
  20705. Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why American monopolies like Amazon, Apple, Google, Facebook (Meta) dominate their respective industries and eliminate the competition, thus reducing innovation through competition. China has anti-monopoly laws to clamp down on anti-competitive practices in Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, freeing up space so that smaller companies can compete and innovate.
    1
  20706. Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why American monopolies like Amazon, Apple, Google, Facebook (Meta) dominate their respective industries and eliminate the competition, thus reducing innovation through competition. Whereas China is clamping down on anti-competitive practices in Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, in order to give smaller companies space to compete and innovate.
    1
  20707.  @jimechols4347  Monopolies like Amazon, Apple, Google, Facebook also dominate their industries and eliminate the competition, effectively reducing innovation through competition. Whereas China is clamping down on anti-competitive practices in Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, in order to give smaller companies space to compete and innovate.
    1
  20708. Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why American monopolies like Amazon, Apple, Google, Facebook (Meta) dominate their respective industries and eliminate the competition, thus reducing innovation through competition.
    1
  20709. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20710. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  20711. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20712. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, if you read its constitution.
    1
  20713. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20714. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China..
    1
  20715. Even the United States of America acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20716. Even the USA acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20717. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  20718. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20719.  @hclau218  Like China, India has a large population too. But like I said, it's a matter of being able to harness the inherent brainpower (and manpower) of the population and channel it in the right direction.
    1
  20720.  @INTJ791  It's YouTube itself that permits this level of censorship, so what has China even got to do with your comments being censored?
    1
  20721. 终于知道了吗？ (＾▽＾)
    1
  20722. China always welcome India to come onboard the Belt and Road Initiative for mutual prosperity.
    1
  20723.  @jackcoolidge8123  USA contributes $400 million to the World Health Organization, whereas China only contributes about $40 million to WHO, so how exactly does China hold more control over WHO? It even says at 1:40 of the video that USA is the largest contributor to WHO.
    1
  20724.  @LuminousSpace  China offered Covid-19 tests for free during the outbreak, but if people in America have to fork out their own cash for testing, then won't that discourage people from getting testing?
    1
  20725.  @MarkYeung1  If Russia suck so much in Ukraine, then why is it Bakhmut has been captured?
    1
  20726.  @bartonlee3594  So you speak German? Why is it that Germans aren't asking questions who's behind Nordstream? It's one of the major infrastructure supplying cheap Russian gas to Germany, and nobody in Germany is interested in finding answers to it?
    1
  20727.  @bartonlee3594  So you speak German? Why is it that Germans aren't asking questions who's behind Nordstream? Such an attack on German infrastructure and nobody in Germany is asking questions?
    1
  20728.  @bartonlee3594  So you speak German? Why is it that Germans aren't asking questions who's behind Nordstream?
    1
  20729.  @laserraiset3300  "don't you know it's a crime to show poverty in china ?" Since when? Poverty alleviation is at the forefront of the Chinese government's policies, since when is it a crime?
    1
  20730.  @bartonlee3594  "Did you answer my three questions on the other thread yet ?" You never answered any of my questions, yet you demand answers out of me to your questions?
    1
  20731.  @bartonlee3594  Wikileaks cables from the United States embassy in Beijing have shown there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square on June 1989. "A Chilean diplomat provides an eyewitness account of the soldiers entering Tiananmen Square: He watched the military enter the square and did not observe any mass firing of weapons into the crowds, although sporadic gunfire was heard. He said that most of the troops which entered the square were actually armed only with anti-riot gear — truncheons and wooden clubs;"
    1
  20732.  @bartonlee3594  "It is dangerous to criticize the government when you live in an authoritarian state." China sees on average some 500 protests everyday. The number of annual protests has grown steadily since the early 1990s, from approximately 8,700 mass group incidents in 1993 to over 87,000 in 2005. In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010. ... (Source: Wikipedia: Protest and dissent in China) That's an average of 493 protests every day in China in 2010.
    1
  20733.  @bartonlee3594  If you watch the full footage of the now infamous "Tank Man" video, it turns out that the tank did not run him over, instead it stopped in its tracks and Tank Man was dragged away from the column of vehicles.
    1
  20734.  @bartonlee3594  "And they all became independent countries in the early 1990s." This means that Ukraine only has a independent history of 30 years, which doesn't really matter much in the grand scheme of things. Using Tibet as an example, Tibet had broken free of Qing Dynasty China in 1912, but was eventually reunified with China by 1952. So with just 40 years of independence, yet today the Tibet Automonous Region is recognized as part of China by countries all over the world. Who knows if the same thing might happen with Ukraine and Russia?
    1
  20735.  @laserraiset3300  That particular video by Hu Chenfeng was taken down because it was falsified. There were previous cases of bloggers cooking up poverty stories as a publicity stunt. In this particular video, why did the old lady trust him so easily? The man had approached others and been rejected multiple times by others, which is typical of how such videos are set up.
    1
  20736. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20737.  @bartonlee3594  Though you've often claimed that you've respected my opinions, once again, you've made it abundantly clear that you don't. You just disagree with others who take a different point of view.
    1
  20738. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  20739.  @nathanzhang9872  老实说翻墙i之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国很傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20740.  @nathanzhang9872  我想跟这些西方人斗一嘛。其实中国有很多成功，但西方媒体偏偏不认，还继续嘿中国。
    1
  20741.  @nathanzhang9872  已经有了，你正在跟我的频道讲话对吗？
    1
  20742.  @DZ477  Video: China says it has not received any Covid-19 aid from US government youtu.be/FmMJZBnmtnM
    1
  20743.  @DZ477  Source: Chinese billionaire Jack Ma says he will donate 1,000,000 face masks and 500,000 coronavirus testing kits to the US cnn.com/2020/03/14/tech/jack-ma-face-masks-us-donation/index.html Chinese billionaire and Alibaba co-founder Jack Ma said he will donate 500,000 coronavirus testing kits and one million face masks to the United States.
    1
  20744.  @Schmuney  What makes you think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  20745.  @relaxwhc  Some YouTube channels allow links, others don't.
    1
  20746.  Keanu Yao  Here's the full interview youtu.be/KLm7er5VoDU
    1
  20747. Instead, the United States has jobless people who sponge off the welfare system, collect food stamps, instead of actually finding a job and contributing to society, while the actual working people pay taxes to support such welfare systems.
    1
  20748.  @angelfire520  How did China break the One Country, Two Systems Policy? Hong Kong has their own democratically elected government, separate from the mainland, so how did China violate the One Country, Two Systems Policy? And Shanghai is fast becoming a global financial centre according Global Financial Centre Index that might someday replace Hong Kong. Source: Global Financial Centre Index wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Financial_Centres_Index#Ranking 1. New York City (790) 2. London (773) 3. Hong Kong (771) 4. Singapore (762) 5. Shanghai (761) <-- 6. Tokyo (757) 7. Beijing (748) ...
    1
  20749.  @bonniebrock5109  "神州 Shenzhou Wasn't hard to figure out. You type like you do. Do you get 50 cents per comment??" I am can speak and write both Chinese and English, yet you still think I'm being paid to post these comments here for a meager 50 cents per post? How's does that make sense to you?
    1
  20750.  @network9990  Studies on the mysterious "vaping illness" that hit America in middle of 2019 show remarkable similarities to Covid-19, so could America possibly be the origin of the coronavirus? Source: Chinese supercomputer and American doctors clash over AI coronavirus diagnosis of young US vaper scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3079046/chinese-supercomputer-and-american-doctors-clash-over-ai
    1
  20751.  @timothy3649  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British, and eyewitness present in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: The Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We’re ‘Remembering’ are British Lies (By Gregory Clark) globalresearch.ca/tiananmen-square-massacre-is-a-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies/5386080 The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing’s iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time — among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    1
  20752.  WHO Puppet Of China  Trump is pointing fingers and blaming China, then Trump blame WHO, blame those medical workers for "backdoor pilfering" and so many things, even when he downplayed the virus for months until it become this bad. And US Military was in Wuhan during 2019 Military Games and there was a mysterious "vaping illness" in America mid-2019 that had symptoms remarkably similar to Covid-19. The CDC Director even testified that autopsies performed on posthumous patients believed to have died from the common flu, actually found to have tested positive for Covid-19. Video: Did Coronavirus come from the USA? youtu.be/3J6zm6zgah0
    1
  20753.  @koblongata  China has the world's largest population at 1.4 billion people, what makes you seem to think we don't have our own independent media in China? For example, how'd you come by the news on that woman if there aren't any independent media in China? You really think the entire population of China gets our news from a single source? "No, countries in the free world are doing great, in much better shape than real estate debt-ridden China really." Rising inflation, rising gas prices, food prices, rising healthcare costs, rising student debt, and how are the rest of the "free world" in better shape than China? The botched U.S withdrawal of Afghanistan has shaken U.S allies belief in the U.S military ability, and the unfolding NATO crisis is another example of how the United States is in decline. "No, Russia created the mess first in Afghanistan which led to crumbling of USSR." Russia eventually left Afghanistan, it's the CIA-trained Mujahadeen remnants in Afghanistan that eventually became Al-Qaeda and other terrorists groups, leading to 9/11 and eventually the U.S invasion of Afghanistan, occupation for over 20 years and withdrawal, leaving chaos in its haste to depart. "The US Afghanistan gov was wimpy and corrupted, the US obviously gave up." So not all countries want to accept this Western-style democracy that U.S imposes onto them and Afghanistan is one example. They tasted democracy for 20 years, yet they still choose the Taliban instead of fighting to defend democracy, this is their overall choice as a country. "But notice that people scrambled to go with the US and were scared to death when Taliban came? They did not choose this, they are simply terrified of Taliban and China." Because those Afghans served the U.S Army as interpreters, scouts, spies, double agents, etc, and were perceived as traitors by the Taliban. But the Taliban had promised amnesty for their previous enemies and they just want peace so that Afghan can begin picking up the pieces of their broken country and start rebuilding. Additionally, the U.S offered American citizenship to any Afghan ally that helped them in Afghanistan, that's why many scrambled for the airports. But once again, the vast majority of Afghanistan remained in their country, and the 300,000-member strong Afghan Army rather surrender to the Taliban than stand and fight to the death for Western democracy. So overall, Afghanistan rejected democracy. And why are you suddenly inserting people being "terrified of China" into the Afghan situation? China has literally nothing to do with Afghanistan's situation to bring about fear of it. "It's a shame it has to end this way, especially for Afghanistan women, that definitely had no choice, Afghanistan is in a new dark age now." You can blame the U.S withdrawal from Afghanistan for that. As for Afghan women, there are Islamic countries, like Saudi Arabia for example, where Muslim society is more conservative compared to Western societies. Afghanistan is also a Muslim county and they've chosen such a path for themselves (even after tasting Western democracy for 20 years) And ironically, the U.S is buddy buddy with Saudi Arabia, they even refused to denounce the Saudi Crown Prince killing of a reporter (Khashoggi), so the actual fact is that the U.S doesn't care about human rights here. "$7 billion is not much really, and the US has the right to claim it because Taliban bombed the World Trade Center." $7 billion is a lot of money, especially to an impoverished country like Afghanistan, and Taliban did not bomb the World Trade Center in the USA, it was al-Qaeda that did so. I thought you boasted earlier that you have access to information in the "free world" yet you didn't know this? Just like you didn't know China was the world's largest recipient of foreign investment in 2020, yet you just blurt out that investments are leaving China recently?
    1
  20754.  @koblongata  How'd you come by the news on that woman if there aren't any independent media in China? You really think the entire population of China gets our news from a single source? "No, countries in the free world are doing great, in much better shape than real estate debt-ridden China really." Rising inflation, rising gas prices, food prices, rising healthcare costs, rising student debt, and how are the rest of the "free world" in better shape than China? "No, Russia created the mess first in Afghanistan which led to crumbling of USSR." Russia eventually left Afghanistan, it's the CIA-trained Mujahadeen remnants in Afghanistan that eventually became Al-Qaeda and other terrorists groups, leading to 9/11 and eventually the U.S invasion of Afghanistan, occupation for over 20 years and withdrawal, leaving chaos in its haste to depart. "The US Afghanistan gov was wimpy and corrupted, the US obviously gave up." So not all countries want to accept this Western-style democracy that U.S imposes onto them and Afghanistan is one example. They tasted democracy for 20 years, yet they still choose the Taliban instead of fighting to defend democracy, this is their overall choice as a country. "But notice that people scrambled to go with the US and were scared to death when Taliban came? They did not choose this, they are simply terrified of Taliban and China." Because those Afghans served the U.S Army as interpreters, scouts, spies, double agents, etc, and were perceived as traitors by the Taliban. But the Taliban had promised amnesty for their previous enemies and they just want peace so that Afghan can begin picking up the pieces of their broken country and start rebuilding. Additionally, the U.S offered American citizenship to any Afghan ally that helped them in Afghanistan, that's why many scrambled for the airports. But once again, the vast majority of Afghanistan remained in their country, and the 300,000-member strong Afghan Army rather surrender to the Taliban than stand and fight to the death for Western democracy. So overall, Afghanistan rejected democracy. And why are you suddenly inserting people being "terrified of China" into the Afghan situation? China has literally nothing to do with Afghanistan's situation to bring about fear of it. "It's a shame it has to end this way, especially for Afghanistan women, that definitely had no choice, Afghanistan is in a new dark age now." You can blame the U.S withdrawal from Afghanistan for that. As for Afghan women, there are Islamic countries, like Saudi Arabia for example, where Muslim society is more conservative compared to Western societies. Afghanistan is also a Muslim county and they've chosen such a path for themselves (even after tasting Western democracy for 20 years) And ironically, the U.S is buddy buddy with Saudi Arabia, they even refused to denounce the Saudi Crown Prince killing of a reporter (Khashoggi), so the actual fact is that the U.S doesn't care about human rights here. "$7 billion is not much really, and the US has the right to claim it because Taliban bombed the World Trade Center." $7 billion is a lot of money, especially to an impoverished country like Afghanistan, and Taliban did not bomb the World Trade Center in the USA, it was al-Qaeda that did so. I thought you boasted earlier that you have access to information in the "free world" yet you didn't know this? Just like you didn't know China was the world's largest recipient of foreign investment in 2020, yet you just blurt out that investments are leaving China recently?
    1
  20755.  @koblongata  How'd you come by the news on that woman if there aren't any independent media in China? You really think the entire population of China gets our news from a single source? "No, countries in the free world are doing great, in much better shape than real estate debt-ridden China really." Rising inflation, rising gas prices, food prices, rising healthcare costs, rising student debt, and how are the rest of the "free world" in better shape than China? "No, Russia created the mess first in Afghanistan which led to crumbling of USSR." Russia eventually left Afghanistan, it's the CIA-trained Mujahadeen remnants in Afghanistan that eventually became Al-Qaeda and other terrorists groups. "The US Afghanistan gov was wimpy and corrupted, the US obviously gave up." So not all countries want to accept this Western-style democracy that U.S imposes onto them and Afghanistan is one example. They tasted democracy for 20 years, yet they still choose the Taliban instead of fighting to defend democracy, this is their overall choice as a country. "But notice that people scrambled to go with the US and were scared to death when Taliban came? They did not choose this, they are simply terrified of Taliban and China." Because those Afghans served the U.S Army as interpreters, scouts, spies, double agents, etc, and were perceived as traitors by the Taliban. Additionally, the U.S offered American citizenship to any Afghan ally that helped them in Afghanistan, that's why many scrambled for the airports. But once again, the vast majority of Afghanistan remained in their country, and the 300,000-member strong Afghan Army rather surrender to the Taliban than stand and fight to the death for Western democracy. So overall, Afghanistan rejected democracy. And why are you suddenly inserting people being "terrified of China" into the Afghan situation? China has literally nothing to do with Afghanistan's situation to bring about fear of it. "It's a shame it has to end this way, especially for Afghanistan women, that definitely had no choice, Afghanistan is in a new dark age now." You can blame the U.S withdrawal from Afghanistan for that. "$7 billion is not much really, and the US has the right to claim it because Taliban bombed the World Trade Center." $7 billion is a lot of money, especially to an impoverished country like Afghanistan, and Taliban did not bomb the World Trade Center in the USA, it was al-Qaeda that did so.
    1
  20756.  @koblongata  How'd you come by the news on that woman if there aren't any independent media in China? You really think the entire population of China gets our news from a single source? Rising inflation, rising gas prices, food prices, rising healthcare costs, rising student debt, and how are the rest of the "free world" in better shape than China? Russia eventually left Afghanistan, it's the CIA-trained Mujahadeen remnants in Afghanistan that eventually became Al-Qaeda and other terrorists groups. You said: "But notice that people scrambled to go with the US and were scared to death when Taliban came? They did not choose this, they are simply terrified of Taliban and China." Because those Afghans served the U.S Army as interpreters, scouts, spies, double agents, etc, and were perceived as traitors by the Taliban. Additionally, the U.S offered American citizenship to any Afghan ally that helped them in Afghanistan, that's why many scrambled for the airports. But once again, the vast majority of Afghanistan remained in their country, and the 300,000-member strong Afghan Army rather surrender to the Taliban than stand and fight to the death for Western democracy. So overall, Afghanistan rejected democracy. And why are you suddenly inserting people being "terrified of China" into the Afghan situation? China has literally nothing to do with Afghanistan's situation to bring about fear of it. $7 billion is a lot of money, especially to an impoverished country like Afghanistan, and Taliban did not bomb the World Trade Center in the USA, it was al-Qaeda that did so.
    1
  20757.  @koblongata  How is the rest of the "free world" in better shape than China, when there's rising inflation, rising gas prices, food prices, rising healthcare costs, rising student debt and so on?
    1
  20758.  @koblongata  How is the rest of the "free world" in better shape than China?
    1
  20759.  @koblongata  Why should I be afraid of the CPC? I think you're the one that's been taught to hate the Communist Party of China and ignore all the good that they've done for China.
    1
  20760.  @user-ng8eb4gp9h  Why are you using the same profile picture as Cyrus Janssen?
    1
  20761. When was the Xí dynasty?
    1
  20762.  @rv8804   Your conversation is rather lengthy, doesn't get to the point, and simply illogical at times. Let's refute your points USA: We want to build a factory in China and we will hire our own people. China: Why are you setting up shop in China and hiring Chinese workers then? There aren't many American workers in China! Shouldn't you stay in America and hire American workers? (It's clear that you don't even understand America's reasons behind setting up factories in China) USA: We buy way more of your goods than you do ours. That's not fair. You give your workers subsidies. That's not fair. China: Well, why don't you define what is fair trade? Why don't you give your own people subsidies if you think its unfair? Our country, our rules, your country, your rules (Why don't you do more research on the topic? You're making Americans look bad.)
    1
  20763. ​ @rv8804  How am I misunderstanding? You clearly said "USA: We don't want or need a partner we can make it ourselves. We just want to build a factory in China we will hire our own people." So aren't you claiming USA wants to set up factory in China and hire American workers to make it yourselves? Why set up shop in China then if you want to hire American workers and make it yourself?
    1
  20764. ​ @jon_nomad  Some Chinese Malaysians and Singaporeans (but not everyone) tend to have a colonial mentality of worshipping Anglo-Saxon Culture, while harboring disdain for any "non-white" culture (including their own). Even though Malaysia and Singapore have long been decolonized, the decolonization of the mind needs to take place in order to heal the mental damage inflicted by the colonizer on the minds of the colonized. Only then, will Malaysia and Singapore truly be free of their colonial past.
    1
  20765. Some Chinese Malaysians and Singaporeans (but not everyone) tend to have a colonial mentality of worshipping Anglo-Saxon Culture, while harboring disdain for any "non-white" culture (including their own). Even though Malaysia and Singapore have long been decolonized, the decolonization of the mind needs to take place in order to heal the mental damage inflicted by the colonizer on the minds of the colonized.
    1
  20766.  @tonyzhan8668  Not only do countries need to be decolonized, but the people's minds have to be decolonized as well, in order to reverse the mental indoctrination inflicted by the colonizer on the minds of the colonized through the education system. Only then will the former colonies truly break free.
    1
  20767.  @tonyzhan8668  Decolonization of the mind needs to take place in order to reverse the mental damage that the colonizers imposed on the minds of the colonized.
    1
  20768.  @bobsmith3983  "神州 Shenzhou Bananas." Yeah. Yellow on the outside, white on the inside.
    1
  20769. Outwardly, USA expressed support for Japan dumping irradiated Fukushima waters. But inwardly, USA has maintained a ban on imports of farming and seafood products from the region near Fukushima. Yet JaYoe Nation thinks Chinese are just being racist against Japanese, when the real two-faced racist is outwardly supporting Japan's decision, but inwardly banning seafood imports from Fukushima?
    1
  20770.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  The point is that USA supports Japan dumping irradiated water in the seas, Anthony Blinken said so. Yet the US policy is to still ban all seafood products from the region near Fukushima, this shows that USA doesn't really mean its words that they support Japan. They are just using Japan as a geopolitical tool.
    1
  20771.  @tratbagd4500  Masks are important, because there are those insidious asymptomatic cases (meaning you don't display any obvious symptoms despite contracting the virus) so you might feel well, decide to go out and socialise, unknowingly spread the virus.
    1
  20772. Black Mirror is fictional story and does not necessarily represent reality.
    1
  20773.  @rusty2629  For some strange reason, mansana also likes to bring up LiZiQi's channel even when the topic has nothing to do with the video.
    1
  20774. Western journalists predictions about China's economy since 1990: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it is already 2025 and China's economy is still growing.
    1
  20775.  @Erakius323  You said: "And Ukraine is not a Nazi state. And got proof of that claim?" Haven't you heard of Azov Brigade? They use symbols such as the Wolfsangel and there are many articles depicting the rise of that ideology in Ukraine. Also many members are worshippers of the notorious Stepan Bandera of WW2.
    1
  20776. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20777. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  20778. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20779. +MrAdonis258 The Tiananmen Square Incident started because protestors (university students mostly) were anti-Deng. The students protestors (like all students) live in the world of academics and textbooks, idealistic and naive, and they think because the West was following democracy, so should China. Because there wasn't enough police forces, so the PLA was called in to disperse the demonstrators.
    1
  20780. +James Porter What makes you think that I am staying in Western country? And why are you resorting to abusing racial slurs against me? I stated that Taiwan was ruled by authoritarian KMT right up to 2016 (2 years ago) when another party, the DPP took over the KMT ruling that's all. You can refute my points so you resort to attacking me personally instead?
    1
  20781. +adlerzwei Where's the proof of your claims?
    1
  20782.  @slimyyyy  Which major country in the world actually recognise Taiwan as its own country? USA, UK, France, Germany, Russia, India, Japan, Korea, etc, all recognise Taiwan as part of China under the One China Policy.
    1
  20783.  @kickneas  That's not PRC's fault, since China is world's 2nd largest economy, whereas Taiwan's economy is only ranked 21st in the world. Why is mainland China so far ahead of Taiwan then?
    1
  20784.  Gus YAO  During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were heavily outnumbered by the KMT, yet KMT still lost the mainland to communists?
    1
  20785.  Gus YAO  The communists were mostly poorly trained peasants, while the KMT had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants) Yet the KMT still lost the mainland to communists?
    1
  20786.  Gus YAO  The KMT held all the initial advantages over the communists, yet they failed to wipe out the communists even after numerous attempts? Why should they get to rule the mainland then?
    1
  20787.  Gus YAO  ROC ruled China from 1912-1949, yet they failed to unify China? Only Mao finally unified China under communism in 1949.
    1
  20788.  Gus YAO  Why is PRC thriving and ROC isn't?
    1
  20789.  Gus YAO  Why don't you answer my previous question?
    1
  20790.  Gus YAO  Mainland China is world's 2nd largest economy today and the manufacturing hub of the world, while Taiwan's economy is ranked 21st, and their manufacturing jobs have been all but outsourced to the mainland ("Made in Taiwan" used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by "Made in China")
    1
  20791.  Gus YAO  The Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again, which government body is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, India, Europe and USA. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm And it's all been achieved under CCP leadership.
    1
  20792.  Gus YAO  If you don't believe the reputable organisation like World Bank and UNESCO, then why don't you quote another source for the poverty and illiteracy in China then? I already gave you my sources.
    1
  20793.  Gus YAO  You disagree with World Bank and UNESCO data, then where's your proof? In 40 years, China has lifted 700 million out of poverty by international standards, whereas the rest of the world only lifted 150 million in comparison. Video: Historical Achievement: Take 700 Million People out of Poverty youtube.com/watch?v=onLbp4WMoz4 "The fact is that China has done a better job of that than any country in the history of the world. China has lifted 728 million people out of poverty by international standards. The whole of the rest of the world has only lifted 152 millon." - Remarks by Douglas Frantz, Former Deputy Secretary-General Oranization for the Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and John Ross, Well-known columnist in UK, Former Deputy Mayor of London.
    1
  20794.  Gus YAO  It was Kuomintang that stole China's wealth back when they fled the mainland to Formosa. Much of Republic of China's wealth was in the possession of the rich landlords (aka the KMT) and it was the peasants that were dirt-poor. When the KMT fled to Formosa, KMT leader Chiang took China's gold reserves with him, which amounted to some 3 million – 5 million taels (113.6 tons – 115.2 tons) of gold, leaving the mainland in ruins and dirt-poor. Source: How one man took China’s gold mining.com/web/how-one-man-took-chinas-gold/
    1
  20795.  Gus YAO  Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-graft campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But when is the last time a democratic country had an anti-corruption campaign of its own? Look at the United States and Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician. Donald Trump even promised to jail her during his presidential campaign, but after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    1
  20796.  Gus YAO  China's economy is ranked 2nd in the world, while Hong Kong's economy is ranked 34th and is clearly in a slump today. Source: List of countries by GDP (nominal) wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal) And look at all the chaotic protests which are inflicting further harm on Hong Kong, the longer the protests drag on? Hong Kong is scaring away potential tourists and investors with the protests. And did you know that Hong Kong actually flourished under authoritarian British colonial rule from 1841 to 1997, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony? Only during the period of Hong Kong handover to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy, when prior to that they had none.
    1
  20797.  Gus YAO  Chiang kai-Shek even served in the Japanese Army from 1909 to 1911. He purged communists from KMT and their removal of Communists from within the ranks allowed him free reign to give himself what amounted to dictatorial power over much of China. Source: 11 Things You Should Know About Chiang Kai-shek https://theculturetrip.com/asia/taiwan/articles/11-things-know-chiang-kai-shek/ When the Japanese invaded Manchuria, Chiang refused to face the Japanese invaders, until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap him to get him to ally with the communists in a united front against the Japanese. (Xi'an Incident) Additionally, the Communists actually saved his leadership, and it’s often forgotten that without the Communists’ help, Chiang would never have survived as a political force, since was the communists who convinced the officers to release Chiang and allow him to take control of the government once again. Chiang’s efforts against the Japanese gained him some influential friends. And although the Communist General Mao was responsible for much of the damage inflicted upon the Japanese, it was Chiang who got the credit mainly from Britain and the US. When civil war broke out in China, Chiang expected help from the allies, but after a long campaign against both the Japanese and the Germans, the US and Britain were reluctant to get involved in a civil war. His Western ‘friends’ literally abandoned him. He suppressed local culture in Taiwan (White Terror) and was responsible for the imprisonment of 140,000 Taiwanese. These people were taken captive for their alleged opposition to the KMT. At this time, anyone openly criticizing the ruling party was deemed a Communist sympathizer. He held the Taiwan presidency for 25 years. He held the Taiwan under a permanent state of martial law, thus ensuring his power was absolute. In fact, the constitution only allowed for two terms in power, but with martial law as his excuse, Chiang could rule indefinitely.
    1
  20798.  Gus YAO  It's clear that you are unable to present any solid arguments of your own. Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, Lenovo, Xiaomi, Oppo, ZTE, etc are expanding overseas and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists business-standard.com/article/news-ians/china-has-world-s-most-outbound-tourists-118100400928_1.html China now world's biggest source of international students as more Chinese head overseas for broader education scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more Chinese people can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  20799.  Gus YAO  About corruption, the Chinese Communist Party is among the world's largest political party, at over 80 million members (about the population size of Germany) so of course corruption in China would be higher than in Philippines. And you think a democracy like Philippines, the President can't jail anyone? Look at Philippines President Duterte and he is jailing drug offenders and executing them without trial, and Duterte was elected democratically.
    1
  20800.  Gus YAO  Hong Kong is clearly a democracy and Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam was voted into power by winning the 2017 elections, garnering over 700 votes out of the 1200-member Election Committee (which consists entirely of Hong Kong groups) and was appointed by Beijing government. But Beijing government did not cast any votes in Hong Kong election and it all votes were cast by Hong Kong. Source: Carrie Lam wins Hong Kong chief executive election, with 777 votes scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2082192/live-decision-day-arrives-hong-kong-race-its-next-leader So how is Hong Kong not a democracy then you tell me? Beijing did not cast any votes in Hong Kong elections at all. And before the handover, Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy for 150 years as a British Colony, so isn't it thanks to mainland China that people of Hong Kong finally get to vote for their favorite leaders?
    1
  20801.  Gus YAO  What do you even know about Chinese companies? China has produced many successful Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, ZTE, LENOVO, DJI, Haier, Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, NetEase, Meituan-Dianping, Bank of China, ICBC, AgBank, China Construction Bank, Ping An Insurance, Sinopec Group, China National Petroleum, China Minmetals, China State Construction, and the list goes on. Many of these companies have successfully made it onto business magazines like Forbes Global 2000 and Fortune Global 500 Sources: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies Forbes Global 2000 wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Global_2000 Fortune Global 500 wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_Global_500 But where are all the famous companies from Taiwan and Hong Kong you tell me? Why aren't your companies doing as well as mainland companies?
    1
  20802.  Gus YAO  China is world's largest automation market today. The Port of Qingdao is fully automated (the first in Asia) and 30% more efficient, saving on 70% labor cost, and can even work at night in complete darkness. Video: Qingdao's Fully Automated Port Sets Operation Efficiency Record youtube.com/watch?v=E--R0r4RBEs Also, the World's biggest automated cargo wharf is Yangshan Deep Water Port in Shanghai, Video: World's Biggest Automated Cargo Wharf Yangshan Deep-water Port Starts Operation in Shanghai youtube.com/watch?v=IzOeAGAu60k The port is automated in container loading and intelligent in production, utilizing an advance system to collect and sort out all the instructions and information to input them into the computer, which then turns them into operating instructions and disseminates them to the operating equipment The core technology of the robotic port was developed independently by China.
    1
  20803.  Gus YAO  China's population doubled from 500,000,000 in 1950s to over 1.4 billion people today, so why do you claim China's population didn’t double? And from 1 in 4 to 1 in 5, that's because the rest of the world's population also increased, that's why Chinese people make up 20% instead of 25%. But the fact remains that Chinese people are the most common and China is world's most populous country even today. So what's your point then?
    1
  20804.  Gus YAO  Look at prosperous Shenzhen in the mainland, just across from Hong Kong and Shenzhen’s economy surpassed Hong Kong in 2017. Source: Shenzhen surpasses US$338 billion GDP mark in 2017, beats Hong Kong and Singapore’s growth scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2128310/shenzhen-88-cent-hi-tech-growth-roll-hit-y2tr-2017 Shenzhen is roughly the same economic size as Singapore and Hong Kong, recorded nominal output of 2.2 trillion yuan (US$338 billion) in 2017 thanks to its booming hi-tech sector, state-run Shenzhen Special Zone Daily reported on Monday. Over 40 per cent of the output came from “innovative” businesses such as internet, biotech and telecom, the report said. And that's in spite of Shenzhen being under authoritarian CCP rule and Hong Kong being under democratic Hong Kong government rule.
    1
  20805.  Gus YAO  I said that the Hong Kong Chief Executive was appointed by Beijing, but not the 1200 member Election Committee. The Election Committee has 4 sectors, each composed of a number of subsectors (with a total of 38 subsectors) and they compose of: 1. Industrial, commercial and financial sectors: 300 members 2. The professions: 300 members 3. Labour, social services, religious and other sectors: 300 members 4. Members of the Legislative Council, representatives of members of the District Councils, representatives of the Heung Yee Kuk, Hong Kong deputies to the National People's Congress, and representatives of Hong Kong members of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference: 300 members Source: Election Committee wikipedia.org/wiki/Election_Committee So Beijing appoints the Hong Kong Chief Executive, but Beijing does not appoint the election committee and neither does Beijing cast any votes in Hong Kong election.
    1
  20806.  Gus YAO  Duterte is elected by the people, then what's wrong when President Xi Jinping is elected by the Communist Politburo? Look at how much Xi done for China as compared to what Duterte done for Philippines? China is prospering under CCP leadership, while Philippines isn't under democracy, so why should China adopt Western democracy then you tell me?
    1
  20807.  Gus YAO  Exactly, Hong Kong actually thrived under authoritarian British colonial rule from 1841-1997 during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote, when before that, they had none? And since Hong Kong thrived under authoritarian British colonial rule, why is there a need to adopt democracy then? Why fix what isn't broken?
    1
  20808.  Gus YAO  Hong Kong was once a thriving port city closest to mainland China, however in recent times it has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan and is facing increasing competition from upcoming mainland cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian, etc. No wonder why the Hong Kong people feel like they're being left behind. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage So what makes you think Hong Kong or Taiwan can even compete with the mainland in terms of sheer volume of port traffic? Mainland port cities are all advancing rapidly and our ports dominate the list of busiest ports in the world.
    1
  20809.  Gus YAO  Who says there's no "computerized warehouse" in China? In this video, robots help a Chinese company finish at least 200,000 packages a day in the warehouse. Video: Robots sorting system finish at least 200,000 packages a day in the warehouse youtube.com/watch?v=_QndP_PCRSw Video: Watch an army of robots efficiently sorting hundreds of parcels per hour youtube.com/watch?v=jwu9SX3YPSk More than 100 robots are delivering goods in a warehouse in Huizhou City, Guangdong province. Video: Robots deliver goods in China's largest smart warehouse youtube.com/watch?v=xI4yTta41No In this Suning warehouse in Shanghai, a total of 270 Automated Guided Vehicles are now in service. Video: China's e-commerce giant uses AGVs in warehouse youtube.com/watch?v=BWAlRN6PSAg
    1
  20810.  Gus YAO  I have thoroughly shown that President Xi Jinping is willing to conduct numerous anti-corruption campaigns in China, as well as outside of China, but all you've done is complain, complain, complain. I mean, corruption is rampart in the communist party, but at least there is progress in dealing with corrupt. I mean you can't possily expect the government to just wipe out all of China's corruption in one fell swoop, isn't it? The government is slowly and systematically going through each individuals corruption charges, so you can't just expect instantaneous rooting out of corruption isn't it? Especially when the Communist party is so massive at 80 million, you can't just jail all the corrupt officials at one go, else the party will fall apart. You can't refute my points on anti-corruption, so you just complain why so slow, why so little being done about it? At least there is something being done about corruption, so what's your point then?
    1
  20811.  Gus YAO  I clearly said earlier that Hong Kong actually flourished under authoritarian British colonial rule, so who's admitting what? And China did not fix Hong Kong, China wanted Hong Kong to be fully returned to the mainland, but HK people wanted democracy so China had the One-Country, Two-Systems policy to allow Hong Kong to have their own separate government from the mainland. And those problems in Hong Kong were caused by Hong Kong government, the mainland China had literally nothing to do with it, so isn't it clear that Hong Kong isn't doing well under democracy? Look at all those HK protests and riots, scaring away potential tourists and investors to Hong Kong. They are HK protestors own doing, not the mainland's
    1
  20812.  Gus YAO  Tianjin the 4th most populous city in China, after Shanghai, Beijing, and Guangzhou, and has been a major seaport and gateway to Beijing. By 2010, around 285 Fortune 500 companies have set up base in Binhai. Here's a video of Beautiful Tianjin youtube.com/watch?v=qIq9_jvMQGA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  20813.  Gus YAO  Beautiful Shanghai has transformed into a modern city. Here is video of Beautiful Shanghai youtube.com/watch?v=kI3Oc-sxSoA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  20814.  Gus YAO  So you can badmouth China, but I can't badmouth India? While India has high birth rate, it also has high child mortality and high child malnutrition, so will their kids even survive to adulthood, in order to surpass China's population? World Bank data indicates that India has one of the world’s highest demographics of children suffering from malnutrition – said to be double that of Sub-Saharan Africa with dire consequences. Source: savethechildren.in/articles/malnutrition-in-india-statistics-state-wise But you're probably going to claim World Bank is bogus data again. The thing is, why don't you provide your own sources if you discount mine?
    1
  20815.  Gus YAO  What peaceful revolution without killing their people? India has a whole Wikipedia page dedicated to List of riots in India, with death tolls reaching up to 5,000 Indians. Source: List of riots in India wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_riots_in_India
    1
  20816.  Gus YAO  Can you actually name any well-known Indian companies as compared to Chinese companies? Take for example, the Top 10 Smartphone Brands in 2019 and Chinese companies dominate the list according to (Source: mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html ) Top 10 Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st Place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) But where are all the famous Indian companies to compare with China?
    1
  20817.  Gus YAO  Shenzhen was once a dirt-poor wetland village (deep drains like you said) but today, Shenzhen is a technological mecca, where one can find the latest smartphones, electronics, cameras, gadgets, drones, hardware, IT, Artificial Intelligence systems, robotics, automation, and many more modern technologies. Chinese company DJI (world's largest civilian drone maker) has their headquarters here, and they hold robotics competition ("RoboMasters") that draws in hundreds of engineering students from all over the world, who compete using robots to achieve specific goals in the game, combining innovation, teamwork and tactics in order to beat other contestant terms. Source: China's High-Stakes Robot Wars youtube.com/watch?v=qrhvZhPaxQ4&t=40 How can Hong Kong even hope to compete with its mainland neighbor, Shenzhen? Yet you want to talk about entry permits, instead of looking at the bigger picture?
    1
  20818.  Gus YAO  The address for the automated AGV warehouse are found in Suning Logistics Base (苏宁控股), in Fengxian District (奉贤区), Shanghai. Besides automated warehouse, some Chinese restaurants are increasingly becoming automated with robotic waiters. For example, Alibaba's Hema (河马 "Hippo") which is both supermarket and restaurant, and make use of robots to server dishes to customers. Video: Robots take over shifts at a restaurant in Shanghai youtube.com/watch?v=6vxW53DTtro There are also robot waitresses at the Together Restaurant in Beijing. Video: In Beijing, Robot Waitresses Are Happy to Serve youtube.com/watch?v=ZCBbejvb7jA
    1
  20819.  Gus YAO  Whoever said "One Country Two Systems" was a point set by the British? "One country, two systems" is a constitutional principle formulated by Deng Xiaoping, the Paramount Leader of the People's Republic of China (PRC), for the reunification of China during the early 1980s. Source: One country, two systems wikipedia.org/wiki/One_country,_two_systems You can't even get your facts straight.
    1
  20820.  Gus YAO  3 days ago I wrote: "Carrie Lam was voted into power by winning the 2017 elections, garnering over 700 votes out of the 1200-member Election Committee (which consists entirely of Hong Kong groups) and was appointed by Beijing government." But I never said the Election Committee was appointed by Beijing government, so why are you putting words in my mouth?
    1
  20821.  Gus YAO  And yes, the Hong Kong Chief Executive was appointed by Beijing, but once again, Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong elections, so what's your point? According to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條) which states the following: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." - Article 45, Hong Kong Basic Law. So the Central People's Government (Beijing) reserves the right to appoint HK Chief executive and is not violating any HK laws here.
    1
  20822.  Gus YAO  The Hong Kong Extradition bill was proposed because of a certain incident. Some Hong Kong guy named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan, then proceeded to strangle her to death, and then flew back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body in Taiwan. Chan has since confessed and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice in Taiwan. But Hong Kong has no existing extradition treaty with Taiwan, and since the crime occurred in Taiwan, Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. That's why HK Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to HK extradition bill to cover up this legal loophole. Do the HK protestors even know what they are protesting about? Have they read the extradition bill and understood its contents in their entirety?
    1
  20823.  Gus YAO  Hong Kong will eventually be fully returned back to China by 2047, once the Sino-British Declaration finally expires, so why delay the inevitable? Look at mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, etc, and they are flourishing under authoritarian CCP rule, while Hong Kong's economy is in a slump today under democracy, and protestors are tearing HK apart and disrupting its economy. And I don't understand why you keep on making personal insults against me and then bringing my parents and grandparents into this discussion. I don't bring your parents into this discussion, because what your parents even got to do with this discussion? You can't refute my points logically, so you start bringing up my parents and grandparents?
    1
  20824.  Gus YAO  India is not your country, so if you can complain and badmouth China, then why can't I do the same to India? India is not your country so what do you care anyway? India is world's largest democracy yet why are they still lagging behind China then? India has 2nd largest population so they have similar workforce as China. Republic of India was founded in 1947 while People's Republic of China was founded 2 years later, in 1949. India is founding member of World Trade Organization in 1995, while China had a late entry into WTO in 2001. Many Indians speak English (more favorable for Westerners) while many Chinese still struggle with English even till today. Yet despite these advantages, China has overtaken India in many areas. For example: -China is world's 2nd largest economy, India is world's 7th. -China has world's 2nd highest military spending, India has world's 5th. -China has world's 2nd highest research spending, while India is 7th. -China has literacy rate of 96.4%, India has literacy rate of 72.1%. -China has Global Hunger Index of 7.5(low) whereas India's is 31.4(serious) -China is world's 3rd largest arms exporter. India is world's largest arms importer.
    1
  20825.  Gus YAO  So you can't even name any notable Indian companies? Even in Internet firms, China has Internet giants like Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, Meituan-Dianping, Net Ease, which are ranked among the world's largest Internet companies. Source: List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies But where are the famous Indian internet companies, if you think India will surpass China? If they are so smart, then where are all their Indian companies as compared to China?
    1
  20826.  Gus YAO  If you want to talk about very smart people, then Chinese and East Asian populations tend to have the highest IQ. According to (Source: Average IQ by Country 2019 worldpopulationreview.com/countries/average-iq-by-country/ ) China has world's 2nd highest IQ only behind Singapore (high Chinese population country) at number one. Japan and Koreans also scored high, however, India average IQ doesn't seem to rank as high as East Asian countries.
    1
  20827.  Gus YAO  If you claim the data is altered, then what's the actual data you tell me? China even overtook United States for healthy life span according to World Health Organization Data. Source: China overtakes U.S. for healthy lifespan: WHO data reuters.com/article/us-health-lifespan-idUSKCN1IV15L Chinese newborns can look forward to 68.7 years of healthy life ahead of them, compared with 68.5 years for American babies. If you disagree with my data about doubled life span, population, literacy, etc, and label them as bogus, then why don't you provide sources of your own to refute my points? So far you have given zero sources to support your claims of these data being bogus.
    1
  20828.  Gus YAO  I literally gave you the address in Shanghai for the automated warehouse. Here is the video: AGV Warehouse of Suning Logistics youtube.com/watch?v=pbsBDwdMxFc Suning Commerce Group, a Fortune Global 500 company owned by Suning Holdings Group (“Suning” or “the Group”), has put its Automated Guided Vehicle (AGV) warehouse into service in Fengxian District, Shanghai, boosting its capabilities in the field of smart logistics.
    1
  20829.  Gus YAO  Shenzhen (深圳) means Deep (深) Drain (圳). The (圳) refers to small furrows in the field, since Shenzhen was originally a swampy village in the past, instead of the high-tech city it is today. And the only thing you can mock about Shenzhen is its name that's all? Or that it needs permits? You can't deny that Shenzhen is a technological hub far more advanced than its Hong Kong neighbor. There are even high-tech fairs held in Shenzhen to display some of the technology being developed there. Video: China's largest high-tech fair opens in Shenzhen youtube.com/watch?v=wdH79ewcqM4
    1
  20830.  Gus YAO  Besides automation, China is home to world's largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world-class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Some passengers even experimented by balancing small objects like coin, pen, mobile phones, on their edges, on a train traveling at 350 kph, and the balanced objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for a long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE Before the advent of high-speed rail, during Spring Festival, many people in China would return our home province to celebrate Chinese New Year with family, and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to High-Speed Rail, the commuting time has been reduced from days to mere hours.
    1
  20831.  Gus YAO  Enjoy your weekend.
    1
  20832.  Gus YAO  China has even sent people in to space! In 2003, Yang Liwei became the 1st person sent into space by the Chinese space program on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft, making China the 3rd country to independently send humans into space. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtube.com/watch?v=tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei China is the 1st Asian country to achieve independent human spaceflight, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, India, Singapore, etc, have not launched manned space missions of their own. China is showing the world that Asians are just as capable of matching Westerners achievements in space.
    1
  20833.  Gus YAO  As the world's most populous country, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, thus there should be 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Taken from the above: Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  20834.  Gus YAO  So no Indian companies come to you thus far? In China there are so many business startups every day, and China has world's 2nd highest number of unicorns (startups with a current valuation of US$1 billion or more) Source: List of unicorn startup companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unicorn_startup_companies 1. United States (127 unicorns) 2. China (104 unicorns) <-- 3. India (23 unicorns) 4. South Korea (9 unicorns) 5. United Kingdom (8 unicorns) 6. Indonesia (4 unicorns) The top unicorns are mostly dominated by China and USA: 1. Ant Financial ($150 billion) (Chinese) 2. Bytedance ($78.0 billion) (Chinese) 3. DiDi ($56 billion) (Chinese) 4. WeWork ($45 billion) (American) 5. Airbnb ($38 billion) (American) ... But where are all the startups from Taiwan and Hong Kong you tell me? How can they match the sheer economic might of the mainland?
    1
  20835.  Gus YAO  This video explains why there are no high speed rail in the United States. Video Why The US Has No High-Speed Rail youtube.com/watch?v=Qaf6baEu0_w According to the video, one survey showed 63% of Americans would use high-speed rail if it was available to them. Younger people want it even more Here's more videos about China's high-speed trains projects. China’s 5th generation maglev train prototype passes test run youtube.com/watch?v=nyf4BjE6Gv0 China to unveil new high-speed train with interchangeable carriages youtube.com/watch?v=WTn8XzjGJHk China’s first supercapacitor tram starts trial operation youtube.com/watch?v=iLoTKeVXA4U China unveils new high-speed maglev train prototype, cutting Beijing-Shanghai journey by hours youtube.com/watch?v=0vzDkxzXdk8
    1
  20836.  Gus YAO  China is home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) and Tianhe-2 (天河-2) and in 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source: China surpasses US in supercomputers usage on Top500 list cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion). This means Chinese researchers have access to some of the world's most advanced facilities to conduct their research and that China will be expected to play a bigger role in science and technology in the future.
    1
  20837.  Gus YAO  I gave you the address and the company name so why don't you book an appointment with Suning Logistics if you want to visit their automated warehouse? Besides automated waiters, China also has self-driving vehicles like cars, buses and even farm tractors. Here are some videos: China's first self-driving taxis hit the road in Guangzhou youtube.com/watch?v=2lsDWjOc8CA Smart self-driving buses put into operation in Tianjin, China youtube.com/watch?v=Go6VgqKV__s Self-driving buses hit the road in China's Shenzhen youtube.com/watch?v=Ci4ekhVSbEI China's first driverless electric tractor starts working youtube.com/watch?v=ITTZRqV9_WQ
    1
  20838.  Gus YAO  You advised me earlier to get permit for Hong Kong, but why go to Hong Kong when Hong Kong is in chaos? Protestors are rioting, shining laser pointers into HK policemen, and teargas and rubber bullets are being fired upon the mobs. Hong Kong airport is occupied and so many international flights been cancelled, airplanes force to turn away, so how to go to Hong Kong? Video: Hong Kong citywide strike turns violent as protesters seize roads and clash with police youtube.com/watch?v=INxOnPCTYJg And that's the daytime footage. Even nighttime there was violence in Hong Kong. Video: Nighttime violence in Hong Kong youtube.com/watch?v=GNORuFpYjHo So why go to Hong Kong when HK is suffering under democracy today?
    1
  20839.  Gus YAO  Even Communist Soviet Union put the first man, Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin in space, so isn't China following in its success? In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtube.com/watch?v=9PAkbT4kTpI&t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. You claim China is late, then isn't Japan, Korea, India, Singapore and other Asian countries even later than China?
    1
  20840.  Gus YAO  Why only look at World Cup? Look at Olympics and China has bagged many Olympic gold medals over the years, scoring a whopping 48 gold medals at the 2008 Beijing Olympics.
    1
  20841.  Gus YAO  China is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending and catching up fast to the United States. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($451.9 billion) <-- 3. European Union ($379.0 billion) 4. Japan ($165.7 billion) 5. Germany ($118.8 billion) 6. South Korea ($91.6 billion) In the West, researchers offend have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    1
  20842.  Gus YAO  Unicorns is the financial term for privately held startup company with a current valuation of US$1 billion or more. You can't refute my claims, so you start making fun of "unicorns"? A report by Deloitte and China Venture says that China accounts for 38.9% of the total number of unicorns globally, and the US accounts for 42.1%. Source: Who has the most unicorns – China or the US? scmp.com/tech/china-tech/article/2110209/who-has-most-unicorns-china-or-us
    1
  20843.  Gus YAO  Our supercomputers are made using home grown chips and the Sunway TaihuLight doesn't need foreign processors to crush its rivals. Source: China made the world's fastest supercomputer using its own chips engadget.com/2016/06/20/homegrown-china-supercomputer-is-worlds-fastest/ Source: China builds world’s fastest supercomputer without U.S. chips computerworld.com/article/3085483/china-builds-world-s-fastest-supercomputer-without-u-s-chips.html
    1
  20844.  Gus YAO  I gave you all the relevant information to locate the automated warehouse in Shanghai. I mean, what are you going to do once you arrived at the warehouse address? Break in illegally like a thief? I won't be an accomplice to your burglary attempts, if you want to see the interior of the automated warehouse, please book a proper appointment with Suning Logistics to view the warehouse.
    1
  20845.  Gus YAO  You sound rather jealous of China's advanced self-driving capabilities. A team of students at Tsinghua University in China have developed an auto-balancing bicycle that can ride around all by itself. Video: Chinese students create self-driving bicycle youtube.com/watch?v=nkDj2Q0buyg Autonomous trucks are being tested at Caofeidian port in Hebei, China Video: Chinese startup tests self-driving trucks at port in Hebei youtube.com/watch?v=Pwewx0iQF_o Video: China's self-driving trucks finish highway test youtube.com/watch?v=rcS5JI8Wm8Y
    1
  20846.  Gus YAO  The West has airplanes instead of high-speed trains? In the aviation industry, the large passenger jets are dominated by duopoly of Boeing (USA) and Airbus (EU) but China is developing the Comac C919 to compete with Boeing 737 MAX and Airbus A320NEO. Video: COMAC C919 - Chinese narrow-body twinjet airliner. History and future of the aircraft youtube.com/watch?v=axZ7YTZgcHg Maybe one day in the future, flying by Chinese jumbo jet would be as common as flying by American and European jumbo jets.
    1
  20847.  Gus YAO  Chinese universities trained the world's most STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) graduates, more than any other country in the world. Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/02/02/the-countries-with-the-most-stem-graduates-infographic/ 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000)
    1
  20848.  Gus YAO  China has even launched space stations into orbit, the world's 3rd to do so after USA and USSR. China's first prototype space station, Tiangong-1 was launched in 2011, followed by Tiangong-2 in 2016. There was even a "space lecture" where Chinese taikonaut in space gave a lecture to her students on the ground from onboard Tiangong-1, demonstrating simple micro-gravity experiments in space. Video: Chinese teacher in space gives lecture to her students on the ground below youtube.com/watch?v=OUAuZnpoZ58 By doing this, we are showing our kids (and future generations of Chinese) that China is both ancient civilization as well as a modern space nation, capable of achieving equally impressive feats as the Westerners in space. China is no longer the sick man of Asia, in fact, China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, and India have not launched space stations of their own into orbit.
    1
  20849.  Gus YAO  You want a list of world popular quality products from China? Take smartphones for example and Chinese brands dominance the Top 10 Smartphone Brands in 2019 according to this source (Source: mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html ) Top 10 Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st Place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French)
    1
  20850.  Gus YAO  Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicorn_(finance) A unicorn is a privately held startup company valued at over $1 billion. The term was coined in 2013 by venture capitalist Aileen Lee, choosing the mythical animal to represent the statistical rarity of such successful ventures. Decacorn is a word used for those companies over $10 billion, while hectocorn is the appropriate term for such a company valued over $100 billion. I mean, why do you keep mocking my English when yours is barely understandable yourself?
    1
  20851.  Gus YAO  I already gave you the necessary information for the automated warehouse in Shanghai. I mean, what are you going to do once you are at the doorstep of the warehouse? You're going to break and enter? Why not book your a prior appointment with the company first and enter the warehouse legally? You really need me to hold your hand all the way to the warehouse?
    1
  20852.  Gus YAO  China's Chengdu J-20 is world's 3rd operational fifth-generation stealth fighter aircraft after the F-22 and F-35 Only 3 countries in the world have flown full-size stealth combat aircraft demonstrations and they are United States (in 1977), Russia (in 2010) and China (in 2011). China is one of two countries (the other being USA) to field operationally ready stealth aircraft in our airforce. Source: Stealth Aircraft wikipedia.org/wiki/Stealth_aircraft#Manned
    1
  20853.  Gus YAO  Japan does not have space stations of their own, and neither does Korea or India. African countries don't have space stations and neither does Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, and even Australia don't have space station, And Tiangong-1 only had 2 year operational lifespan, expected to be de-orbited in 2013. It's lifespan was even extended by 2 more years, but it lasted all the way till 2018.
    1
  20854.  Gus YAO  Sharma did not walk on the Moon, so why are you making up lies? Till now, India has not even conducted any manned space mission, unlike China which has conducted regular manned space missions. Shenzhou-10 landed safely back in 2013 and Shenzhou 11 landed back in 2016. Video: China Shenzhou-10 astronauts return safely to earth youtube.com/watch?v=IxeutzIVMGE Reentry Module of China's Shenzhou-11 Back Home youtube.com/watch?v=5WJFltdcqAo
    1
  20855.  Gus YAO  No Indians ever walked on the Moon and the Indians only crash landed a probe into Moon. Whereas in 2013, China landed our very own lunar spacecraft and lunar rover (Chang'e 3 嫦娥-3 and Yutu 玉兔 "Jade Rabbit") on the Moon, making China the world's 3rd nation to make a soft-landing on Earth's celestial neighbor. Source: China Lands On The Moon space.com/23968-china-moon-rover-historic-lunar-landing.html In October 2015, the Jade Rabbit set the record for the longest operational period for a rover on the Moon. The rover's ground penetrating radar found evidence of at least 9 distinct rock layers. Video: China moon landing video: 'Jade Rabbit' rover soft-lands on lunar surface youtube.com/watch?v=XpAwmVPT758 Through this, China is showing that Chinese people are capable of achieving equally impressive feats as Westerners in space.
    1
  20856.  Gus YAO  Look at you, constantly dissing on China's achievements as if you are jealous, all because you can't refute my points, so you resort to mocking China's accomplishments, mocking me, bringing up my parents and grandparents before, and other personal insults. You don't even contribute anything useful to this discussion, only hurling insults and dismissing China's achievements.
    1
  20857.  Gus YAO  According to eyewitnesses present in Tiananmen Square 1989, Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053 (By Gregory Clarke)
    1
  20858.  Gus YAO  40 years lagging behind? Why did NASA neglect the Moon for over 40 years then you tell me? And no Indian ever landed on the Moon otherwise, why don't you tell me what year Sharma went to the Moon? He didn't! And did Japan, Korea, or other Asian countries landed on the Moon themselves? How about Japan, Korea, etc launching spacestations of their own into orbit?
    1
  20859.  Gus YAO   You asked for list of world quality Chinese products, and I gave you one with cellphones, yet you just complain? Even in drones, Chinese companies dominate the Top 10 Dronemakers in 2019 and DJI is world's largest civilian drone maker Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies – 2019 top10drone.com/top-drone-companies/ 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 3. 3dr (American) 4. Yuneec (Chinese) 5. EHang (Chinese) 6. Walkera (Chinese) 7. Syma (Chinese) 8. Autel Robotics (American) 9. Blade (French) 10. Hubsan (Chinese)
    1
  20860.  Gus YAO  China is 1st country in the world to land on the far side of the Moon. China's Chang'e-4 (嫦娥四号) achieved the first soft landing on the far side of the Moon, on 3 January 2019, using a relay satellite Queqiao (鹊桥 'Bridge of Magpies') Video: youtube.com/watch?v=JWlxoU5DpLk The Chinese lunar rover Yutu-2 (玉兔二号 'Jade Rabbit 2') explored the Von Kármán crater on the Moon's far side, and even conducted experiments on the Moon such as growing cotton seeds on the Moon (first biological matter to be grown on the Moon) Video: Chinese space mission brings first seeds to life on moon’s surface youtube.com/watch?v=Zu-G-MncYaw Through this, we are showing that we Chinese people are just as capable as Westerners in space achievements, and that we are also pioneers in space exploration. Why should Chinese people consider ourselves inferior to Westerners? We need to shrug off this misconception, else Chinese (and other Asians) will always be behind Westerners in achievements if our mindsets don't change.
    1
  20861.  Gus YAO  The truth hurts, that's why you continually refuse to acknowledge China's achievements and repeatedly mock China's accomplishments. And your English is at times completely illegible, yet you mocked my English proficiency earlier, when your own English standard apparently far lower than mine? Who hired you in the first place when your English is barely understandable?
    1
  20862.  Gus YAO  I gave you sources showing Chinese companies dominating Top 10 Smartphone brands and Drone brands in 2019, yet your typical response is to continually ridicule our products? Chinese company EHang even unveiled world's 1st passenger drone Video: World’s First Passenger Drone Unveiled In China | NBC News youtube.com/watch?v=B7Hm-rmLQcU This is no ordinary "toy-copter". The EHang 184 made its maiden flight in Guangzhou City, China in 2018. Electrically powered, the passenger drone can carry a single passenger for 23 minutes at over 60 mph. Developers hope the drones will be used for emergency rescues and tourism, as well as just helping people avoid traffic.
    1
  20863.  Gus YAO  Besides automated warehouse, China conducted the world's first 5G remote surgery on test animal. The doctor is located some 50 km away from the operating theater, using robotic arms to operate on a test animal and remove its liver. Video: China completes world’s first 5G remote surgery in test on animal youtube.com/watch?v=yFR61jjL1vo This is a world first, and no other country has performed remote surgery over a 5G network as China has done so far.
    1
  20864.  Gus YAO  Truth is that China has launched spacestations into orbit and landed our very own lunar rover on the far side of the Moon, but the truth hurts you so much, that you spiteful resort to mocking China's space achievements. I have already shown that No Indian ever landed on the Moon, so why you are spreading lies about "sharma" landing on the Moon? You can't even give the actual date he allegedly landed the Moon, because he clearly didn't.
    1
  20865. ​ Gus YAO  Earlier you were the one consistently mocking my English proficiency, asking me to consult my English teacher, but just look at your English and its barely even legible at times. You employ an excessive amount of punctuation marks, you deliberately contracted certain words until I don't even know what you are talking about anymore! It's as though you're like speaking some alien troll language, because you can't refute my points properly.
    1
  20866.  Gus YAO  I listed the Top 10 Smartphones and Top 10 Dronemakers in 2019, and the lists are dominated by Chinese companies, so aren't they quality Chinese products? China also have solar-powered UAVs like Caihong (彩虹 "Rainbow"), MOZI-2 (墨子-2) and "Meiying" in the following videos: Video: Chinese-built solar drone 'Rainbow' reaches 20,000 meters high youtube.com/watch?v=HUkKW9ehQk8 China's Rainbow drone reached an altitude of 20,000 meters during a test flight. The goal is to have the plane stay in the air for months or even years on end, serving as a more flexible, economic satellite, operating in near space for both civilian and military applications. Video: China-made solar-powered unmanned aircraft completes maiden flight youtube.com/watch?v=BqkHlTcbut4&t The MOZI 2 aircraft, with a wingspan of 15m (49ft), runs only on solar power. After an 8-hour charge, it can reach an altitutde of 8,000m (26,247ft) and fly for about 12 hours at low speed. The aircraft is expected to be used for disaster relief and other applications. Video: Chinese solar-powered drone completes winter test flight youtube.com/watch?v=ZkgmW5yXpD4 Chinese solar-powered drone “Meiying” has successfully completed its 10-hour long-haul test flight in dimly-lit winter. Scientists from the Northwestern Polytechnical University hope the drone can fly throughout the year even in low light conditions.
    1
  20867.  Gus YAO  Besides launching space stations, China also demonstrated the ability to launch rockets from a floating platform in the Yellow Sea, making China the world's 3rd nation to master maritime launch technology, after USA and USSR. Video: China's first satellite launch from floating sea platform sees it rocket ahead in space race youtube.com/watch?v=AOEJeHJj7kI The Long March 11WEY vehicle carried seven satellites into space. Ocean platforms are more flexible to use and reduce the risk of rocket debris hitting populated areas. Launch services may even be offered to countries that sign up for China's Belt and Road Initiative.
    1
  20868.  Gus YAO  No Indian ever landed on the Moon so why are you spreading lies that Indians have landed and walked on the Moon? That's why you are unable to give the date that Indians walked on the Moon, because it did not happen. And Indians have not even launched their own space stations into orbit in the first place, so why are you mocking Chinese spacestations? The truth hurts, so you can't bear to see China progress, because you have been fed all the negative things about China?
    1
  20869.  Gus YAO  Besides civilian drones, China even manufactured combat UAVs for military use, such as Caihong-4 (彩虹四号 "Rainbow-4") and Caihong-5 combat drones, which have often been compared with General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper combat drone. Video: China unveils its answer to US Reaper drone how does it compare youtube.com/watch?v=Oe7o9grEf-Q CH-4 is capable of firing air-to-ground missiles from altitude of 5,000 meters (~16,400 feet), therefore the aircraft can stay outside of effective range of most anti-aircraft guns as well as allowing the drone to be able to fire from a position that provides wider viewing area. CH-5 has a wingspan of 21m, a payload of 1,000 kg, a maximum takeoff weight of over 3 tonnes, a service ceiling of 9 km, an endurance of up to 60 hours and a range of 10,000 km. The drone can carry 16 missiles at a single time and has a shared data link which it can cooperate with other CH-3 and CH-4 drones. The CH-5 is similar in performance to the MQ-9 Reaper but very much cheaper and "may come in at less than half the price." Video: China's homegrown CH-5 drone holds live-fire drill youtube.com/watch?v=HcETgSM_AAY
    1
  20870.  Gus YAO  In 2016, China completed world's largest radio telescope, the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) also known as Tianyan 'Eye of the Heavens'. The 1,650-foot-wide dish was built in China's Guizhou Province and will help scientists learn more about the universe's early days, detect low-frequency gravitational waves and hunt for signals that may have been produced by distant alien civilizations. Source: China Finishes Building World's Largest Radio Telescope space.com/33357-china-largest-radio-telescope-alien-life.html The larger the radio dish, the more sensitive it is to picking up signals from space and FAST's potential to discover an alien civilization will be 5 to 10 times that of current equipment, as it can see farther and darker planets. Since its trial operations began in 2016, China's radio telescope has discovered 44 new pulsars, which are a type of solar phenomena in which a rapidly rotating star emits radiation periodically (like some sort of "cosmic lighthouse" if you will) Video: 44 pulsars identified by China's FAST telescope youtube.com/watch?v=t9nySMjiUzw
    1
  20871.  Gus YAO  Here's another video: FAST: The World's Largest Telescope | A China Icons Video youtube.com/watch?v=7SRV3rnULO0 And I have already shown that FAST discovered 44 pulsars during its lifetime so far, due to its increases sensitivity. Imagine how many more are going to be discovered in the future. As a Chinese, I am glad China is able to contribute to scientific advancement and help astronomers in space exploration. Who cares whether China is late or not, as long as we made it? Better late than never!
    1
  20872.  Gus YAO  Who says you need to move the discs? The receiver that is suspended by cables above the radio dish does all the movement and positioning to detect pulsars. Did you see my previous video explaining how FAST is used to detect pulsars? And what has your high-speed train analogy even got to do with this?
    1
  20873.  Gus YAO  China is experiencing a breakthrough in high-speed rail. China Railway High-speed trains (HCR) close the 1,318 km distance from Beijing to Shanghai in just 4 hours and 18 minutes, reaching up to 350 km per hour. This is China: Chinese Speed. China's high speed rail breakthrough youtube.com/watch?v=P_Sa1YHmxog
    1
  20874.  Gus YAO  I am having a difficult time making heads or tails of your barely legible English sentences and trying to understand what you are saying. Why don't you make a better effort to write proper English? Because at time I don't know what are you rambling on at times. About Indian Moon Mission, my congratulations if Chandrayaan manages to soft-land on the Lunar surface. Like I said previous, it's better late than never, other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, etc, have not conducted soft lunar landings on the Moon thus far, and so do countries besides USA and Russia, like Britain, France, Germany, etc. About China's radio telescope, it was only commissioned in 2016 onwards so of course its contribution to space science community is less. But give it a few more decades and China's contribution to space sciences will only continue to grow.
    1
  20875.  Gus YAO  In 2016, China launched world's 1st quantum satellite, named Micius, (墨子) into orbit and demonstrated that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere, smashing the previous record held on Earth. Video: China's Quantum satellite achieves 'spooky action' at record distance youtube.com/watch?v=4QlcKuxDGrs Quantum entanglement (in a nutshell) is when two subatomic particles become an "entangled pair", able to influence their quantum states (won't go into detail here) seemingly regardless of the distance involved. One particle could be on the surface of the Earth, and the other on the surface of the Moon, and theoretically, they can still influence each other with no information (known to current science) passing in between them. The longest record for quantum entanglement on Earth is 143 km in at experiment in the Canary Islands. But China has allowed two stations (Delingha and Lijiang station) located 1200 km apart to communicate directly, through our quantum satellite, thus breaking the previous record and showcasing that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere. And as far as I know, this is a world first, and China is the first to launch quantum satellite into space.
    1
  20876.  Gus YAO  You're English is extremely hard to follow, because you insert too may punctuation and contract words until I can't comprehend what you are saying at times. Here is are videos of travelers experiencing China's high speed rail business class and first class: Chinese Bullet Train BUSINESS CLASS to Hong Kong! youtube.com/watch?v=UYDLfTBRyjs Bullet Train FIRST CLASS in China youtube.com/watch?v=hxOFP9Q8kBE China High Speed Rail (CRH) BUSINESS CLASS REVIEW - Chinese Bullet Train youtube.com/watch?v=cInO28ZIFXY
    1
  20877.  Gus YAO  Who says other countries don't purchase any of China's trains? Chinese high-speed railway in Turkey: youtube.com/watch?v=NMLomlq0r-g Chinese-made bullet trains for Sri Lanka youtube.com/watch?v=oT59a2w8Jmc Chinese-made trains in Brazil, Argentina youtube.com/watch?v=RKrWwfwM4BU Chinese trains in Cuba youtube.com/watch?v=zTjNXe8Lg6o Rio passengers benefits from Chinese trains: youtube.com/watch?v=rCZPz5jq1dw
    1
  20878.  Gus YAO  China is even investing into Nuclear Fusion reactors, building an "Artificial Sun" that reached temperatures 6 times hotter than the Sun. Video: China Made An Artificial Star 6 Times Hotter Than The Sun youtube.com/watch?v=oGE9MmG4zhk A team at the Hefei Institutes of Physical Science of the Chinese Academy of Sciences announced that its Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) reactor, has hit a new temperature of reaching 100 million degrees Celsius. The EAST has been dubbed as “artificial sun” since it replicates the process used by the sun to produce energy. It burns at 100 million degrees Celsius, which is over six times hotter than the core of the sun. The temperature of the real sun’s core is at around 15 million degrees Celsius. The state-of-the-art reactor is designed to turn hydrogen into cost-effective green energy. Source: China builds an ‘artificial sun’ that is 6 times hotter than our ‘natural sun’ techworm.net/2018/11/china-artificial-sun-six-times-hotter-natural-sun.html Nuclear fusion is a project that if successful, would theoretically supply power for the entire globe and to greatly reduce our over reliance on dwindling fossil fuel energy sources that pollute the Earth.
    1
  20879.  @phantasmaleye3879  Where did I criticise the period of Martial Law on Taiwan? I pointed out that Taiwan actually flourished under authoritarian KMT rule in what's known as the as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. So why Taiwan replaced the politically experienced KMT with the green and inexperienced DPP?
    1
  20880.  @phantasmaleye3879  Little evidence? Under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. What more evidence do you need? Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. DPP has less political experience than KMT, why the people of Taiwan switch their capable KMT government for the green and inexperienced DPP?
    1
  20881.  @phantasmaleye3879  Taiwan Miracle period all occurred under authoritarian KMT rule, isn't it? Much of Taiwan's prosperity occurred under the KMT so what more evidence do I need to provide for you to see the truth? You're just acting blind to the fact that Taiwan prospered under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, despite the 38-year martial law and numerous human rights violations and suppression of political dissidents under the KMT, that's a fact that you have to face.
    1
  20882.  @phantasmaleye3879  Taiwan used to be one of Four Asian Tigers but since democracy was introduced to Taiwan, it's economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving for jobs in the mainland or Singapore Video: How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents | Insight | CNA Insider youtu.be/P3BCnPb8qHY?t=110 "From the '90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreements on policy matters. This produced less effective policy making. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be more conservative in Taiwan, so they do not enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou, Research Fellow, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica
    1
  20883.  @phantasmaleye3879  Look at Hong Kong? Previously, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule from 1841-1997, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as British colony?
    1
  20884.  @phantasmaleye3879  I literally given tonnes of evidence of how Taiwan flourished under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, yet you still still claim that I'm wrong? I even cited a Research Fellow from Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Ray Chou showing that Taiwan's economy is in a slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising, yet you still saying Taiwan has not gotten worst since DPP came into power? Then perhaps you're the one blatantly ignoring reality here, in your blind devotion to defend democratic ideology. What more evidence do I need to show that Taiwan flourished under authoritarian single-party KMT rule? Look at mainland China and we are flourishing under Control Party of China rule.
    1
  20885.  @phantasmaleye3879  Hong Kong actually held more elections after the 1997 handover back to mainland China than it ever did for 150 years as British colony, what more do I need to say? Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy while it was British colony and it's thanks to China's One Country, Two Systems Policy that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. And who says Hong Kong isn't free? They have the freedom to protest for 6 months and you still think Hong Kong isn't free? According to Index of Freedom in the World, Hong Kong ranks among the world's freest. Source: Index of Freedom in the World wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Freedom_in_the_World In 2012, the freest countries/regions were New Zealand (8.7), the Netherlands (8.5), and Hong Kong SAR, (8.3). Highest ranking in economic freedoms were Hong Kong (9.0) and Singapore (8.8).
    1
  20886.  @phantasmaleye3879  "because I never doubted that Taiwan's economy grew under authoritarian rule. I have already said this, look at my previous comments." Earlier you said (and I quote): "You are wrong. It had nothing to do with the KMT." so why are you suddenly changing your words? Earlier you said "You are acting blind to the fact that economic wealth does not equate to prospering" but according to the Oxford dictionary: prospering succeed in material terms; be financially successful. Prosper to be successful or fortunate, especially in financial respects; thrive; flourish. Source: dictionary.com/browse/prospering So how is material wealth/economic growth not equal to prospering?
    1
  20887.  @phantasmaleye3879  "The DPP, unlike the KMT, has been standing up to Chinese interference and threats which is retaining Taiwan independence and democracy." Taiwan is part of China and if you read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China under the One China policy. And Taiwan has failed to deliver on its promise to someday retake the mainland and Chinese warships and aircraft can sail through the Straits of Taiwan or fly through its airspace with impunity. Source: China aircraft carrier crosses Taiwan Strait amid tension bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-38579559 Source: Taipei says Chinese military aircraft flew night exercise across Taiwan Strait scmp.com/news/china/military/article/3075526/taipei-says-chinese-military-aircraft-flew-night-exercise
    1
  20888.  @phantasmaleye3879  2012 is already after the 1997 Hong Kong handover, how's that a different story? Hong Kong actually held more elections after the 1997 handover back to mainland China than it ever did for 150 years as British colony, so Hong Kong clearly did not enjoy democracy under authoritarian British colonial rule. Even today, Hong Kong recently held an election resulting in landslide victory for pro-democracy candidates Source: Hong Kong voters deliver landslide victory for pro-democracy campaigners theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/24/hong-kong-residents-turn-up-for-local-elections-in-record-numbers So how exactly is Hong Kong not free then? The police only block marches that are illegal and unauthorised, under Hong Kong law the HK protestors have to properly register for protests and the HK police are authorised to break up any unlawful protests. And did you see the numerous videos of Hong Kong protestors rioters resorting to violence, arsonism, vandalism, hurling petrol bombs, breaking building windows, security cameras, traffic lights? Which place in the world is free to conduct such riot activities except for Hong Kong?
    1
  20889.  @phantasmaleye3879  Earlier you said (and I quote): "You are wrong. It had nothing to do with the KMT." then later you said  "because I never doubted that Taiwan's economy grew under authoritarian rule." so you are clearly admitting that under authoritarian rule (that is, under the KMT) Taiwan's economy grew. So how is it not because of KMT policies? Did you study the Taiwan Miracle and how Taiwan prospered under the KMT rule? Earlier you said "You are acting blind to the fact that economic wealth does not equate to prospering" so you clearly said prospering and did you even look up the definition of prosperity before you start calling me blind? Here's the definition of prospering _prosper verb (of a person or a business) to be or become successful,_ especially financially: Source: dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/prospering prosper verb Save Word To save this word, you'll need to log in. prospered; prospering to succeed in an enterprise or activity especially : to achieve economic success So how exactly does economic wealth does not equate to prospering?
    1
  20890.  @phantasmaleye3879  2012 is already after the 1997 Hong Kong handover, how's that a different story? I have shown that Hong Kong already held more elections after the 1997 handover than it ever did for 150 years as British colony, so what's your argument about decline in democracy in Hong Kong when they had virtually none as British colony? You're just going to keep accusing me of being uninformed? Look, Hong Kong actually prospered under British colonial rule and only because democracy was introduced that HK began to decline today. All those HK protests is because of democracy, that's why Hong Kong economy is in recession, so what's the point of democracy? Previously, Hong Kong was a thriving port city under British colonial rule, while the mainland was still dirt-poor at that time. Today however, fortunes have reversed and Hong Kong has since fallen behind rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan, and is facing increasing levels of competition from other upcoming mainland port cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian. Here's a list of busiest ports. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports Source: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage#2012%E2%80%932017 No wonder why the people of Hong Kong feel like they're slowly being left behind as mainland cities start surpassing Hong Kong. "And the protestors did register, only to be denied a permit" That means that the marches are illegal and those HK protestors are protesting illegally. HK police is following the Rule of Law by arresting those illegal protests. Have you seen the video of HK rioters dousing a man in flammable liquid and setting him on fire? Just because he disagreed with their views?
    1
  20891.  @phantasmaleye3879  These are your actual words quoted directly. "You are wrong. It had nothing to do with the KMT." then later you said: "because I never doubted that Taiwan's economy grew under authoritarian rule." So you are clearly admitting that under authoritarian rule (that is, under the KMT) Taiwan's economy grew. So how is it not because of KMT policies? You're just deliberately not giving credit to KMT where credit is due. Earlier you said: "You are acting blind to the fact that economic wealth does not equate to prospering" So you clearly said prospering, not flourishing so why are you changing your words? And you resort to calling me blind when you clearly said "prospering"? I have shown that definition of prospering has material wealth and economic success, you just refuse to admit that you're wrong here. Anyone can see your words here and be the judge of this.
    1
  20892.  @phantasmaleye3879  About Taiwan and the mainland, Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Taiwan and Hong Kong as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan and Hong Kong possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  20893.  @phantasmaleye3879  You can't refute my points so you resort to hurling personal insults like calling me ignorant and uninformed? Hong Kong held more elections after the 1997 handover so that already means that Hong Kong is more democratic today than before. And Hong Kong was actually prosperous under authoritarian British colonial rule, so why should Hong Kong adopt democracy then? Because Westerners say so? Look at prosperous Shenzhen in the mainland, just across from Hong Kong and Shenzhen’s economic growth surpassed Hong Kong's in 2017. Source: Shenzhen surpasses US$338 billion GDP mark in 2017, beats Hong Kong and Singapore’s growth scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2128310/shenzhen-88-cent-hi-tech-growth-roll-hit-y2tr-2017 Shenzhen is roughly the same economic size as Singapore and Hong Kong, but recorded nominal output of 2.2 trillion yuan (US$338 billion) in 2017 thanks to its booming hi-tech sector. Over 40% of the output came from “innovative” businesses such as internet, biotech and telecom. And that's despite Shenzhen being under communist party rule, while Hong Kong is suffering under its own democratic government. Hong Kong police does not deny people from protesting, but if they fail to submit the proper documentation or meet the requirements then they aren't allowed to protest. Hong Kong Basic Law also states that the police are allowed to enforce rule of law in Hong Kong. And Hong Kong will eventually be fully returned back to China by 2047 anyway, once the Sino-British declaration finally expires after 50 years after the 1997 handover. How is Hong Kong's government under Beijing's control? Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections, all Beijing does is appoint the Chief Executive according to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條) which states the following: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." "The method for selecting the Chief Executive shall be specified in the light of the actual situation in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and in accordance with the principle of gradual and orderly progress." So Beijing (Central People's Government) is not breaking any laws by appointing the Hong Kong Chief Executive and Beijing can modify the method in light of the actual situation in Hong Kong.
    1
  20894.  @phantasmaleye3879  German IT watchdog, the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) has found no evidence that Huawei could be used for spying. Germany's IT watchdog has expressed scepticism about calls for a boycott of Chinese telecoms giant Huawei, saying it has seen no evidence the firm could use its equipment to spy for Beijing. Source: German IT watchdog says 'no evidence' of Huawei spying thelocal.de/20181216/german-it-watchdog-says-no-evidence-of-huawei-spying "For such serious decisions like a ban, you need proof," the head of Germany's Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Arne Schönbohm, told Spiegel, adding that his agency had no such evidence. More likely the USA is trying to strike an economic blow against Huawei because of how successful it has become. Huawei even overtook Apple as world's 2nd largest smartphone maker, just behind Samsung at number one. Source: Huawei overtakes Apple as world No. 2 smartphone seller, gains ground in China reuters.com/article/us-huawei-revenue/huawei-overtakes-apple-as-world-no-2-smartphone-seller-gains-ground-in-china-idUSKBN1KL0BN
    1
  20895.  @phantasmaleye3879  Besides Huawei, Xiaomi was started in 2010. Today it's one of the world's most popular smartphones. In India, it's number one. Video: How Xiaomi broke out of China to go global | CNBC Reports youtu.be/291DlKa7iIU But where are the famous companies from Taiwan and Hong Kong as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan and Hong Kong ever hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  20896.  @phantasmaleye3879  France’s cybersecurity chief said his agency hasn’t uncovered any evidence of Huawei Technologies Co. spying via Europe’s communications networks. Source: There’s no proof to show Huawei was spying in Europe, France says theprint.in/world/theres-no-proof-to-show-huawei-was-spying-in-europe-france-says/357011/ “There is no Huawei smoking gun as of today in Europe,” said Guillaume Poupard, the head of the national cybersecurity agency ANSSI, in an interview with Bloomberg News. “There is no situation with Huawei being caught massively spying in Europe." The USA is just trying to strike an economic blow against Huawei because of its success that's all.
    1
  20897.  @phantasmaleye3879  Besides smartphones, China sells the best drones in the world, and DJI is world's largest civilian drone maker. Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 top10drone.com/top-drone-companies/ But where are the famous companies from Taiwan and Hong Kong as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan and Hong Kong possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  20898.  @phantasmaleye3879  Besides Germany and France, even Britain has found no evidence of Huawei spying. Source: Britain managing Huawei risks, has no evidence of spying: official reuters.com/article/us-huawei-europe-britain/britain-managing-huawei-risks-has-no-evidence-of-spying-official-idUSKCN1Q91PM Britain is able to manage the security risks of using Huawei telecoms equipment and has not seen any evidence of malicious activity by the company, a senior official said on Wednesday, pushing back against U.S. allegations of Chinese state spying. It's the USA that wants to strike an economic blow against Huawei by accusing it of spying without even providing actual evidence of Huawei spying.
    1
  20899.  @phantasmaleye3879  DJI drones are well known, here's some videos of DJI products: Video: DJI - This Is Mavic Air 2 youtu.be/IwoyGb-NWDs Video: GREATEST DRONE EVER!! DJi Mavic Pro youtu.be/iPG1Xa5Uqwo Video: DJI - Introducing Mavic Mini youtu.be/hS_OjalEpZI But where are all the famous companies from Taiwan and Hong Kong as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan and Hong Kong possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  20900.  @phantasmaleye3879  Source: In Philippines, police inquiry finds no evidence of Huawei spying for Beijing scmp.com/news/asia/southeast-asia/article/3011195/philippines-police-inquiry-finds-no-evidence-huawei-spying Philippine authorities on Tuesday said there was no evidence Huawei engages in spying for Beijing, based on the initial results of an inquiry into espionage allegations against the Chinese telecommunications giant. USA is just trying to strike an economic blow against Huawei success that's all, other countries have found no evidence of Huawei spying.
    1
  20901.  @phantasmaleye3879  DJI even manufacture agricultural drones for spraying pesticides more effectively in farms. Video: DJI MG-1S - Agricultural Wonder Drone youtu.be/P2YPG8PO9JU Video: DJI - Agras T16 - Agricultural Spraying Drone youtu.be/Dn7Q4oIrP3I Video: DJI MG-1P – Agricultural Spraying Drone youtu.be/IH_kGijV8so
    1
  20902.  @phantasmaleye3879  In your first source, so because Ren Zhengfei, the founder of the company, served as an engineer in the army in the early 1980s, suddenly means that Huawei is spying for the government? In a 2011 open letter, Huawei stated that the security concerns are "unfounded and unproven" and called on the U.S. government to investigate any aspect of its business. The Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (national language of China) Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth and they learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America. What's Huawei supplying surveillance technology to Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region even got to do with sales of allegations of Huawei espionage in the West? Huawei actually spans much of the globe despite US attempts to ban it. Source: China's Tech Giant Huawei Spans Much Of The Globe Despite U.S. Efforts To Ban It npr.org/2019/10/24/759902041/chinas-tech-giant-huawei-spans-much-of-the-globe-despite-u-s-efforts-to-ban-it ALLOWED Angola, Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Brazil, Cambodia, China, Cyprus, Egypt, Estonia, Faroe Islands, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Iceland, Indonesia, Iraq, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Latvia, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritius, Moldova, Monaco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Netherlands, Oman, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Russia, Samoa, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, Uzbekistan BANNED Australia, Japan, New Zealand, United States
    1
  20903.  @phantasmaleye3879  Hong Kong been having protests for more than half a year already and the HK extradition bill that started this whole mess has already been scrapped by the HK government, yet why are the HK protestors still ongoing? Even after the Covid-19 Pandemic? Washington even passed the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act even though Hong Kong is none of their concern, so can't Beijing pass a Hong Kong National Security Law to put an end to the months long protests in Hong Kong?
    1
  20904.  @phantasmaleye3879  The Hong Kong extradition bill was proposed because of a certain incident. A Hong Kong guy named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, and stuff her body in her suitcase, before flying back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice for his crime, but Hong Kong has no extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to Hong Kong extradition laws. Do the HK protestors even know what they are protesting for? Have they read the bill and understood its contents in their entirety? And now the bill has been scrapped, what are the Hong Kong protestors still protesting for? Beijing dud nothing for more than a year, yet the Hong Kong protestors still continue to destroy their country, so Beijing is implementing the Hong Kong National Security Law. Hong Kong is part of China after all, yet Washington can implement their Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act?
    1
  20905.  @phantasmaleye3879  What crime did your uncle commit to end up in jail? Just because he's your uncle doesn't necessarily mean that he's innocent. Why Hong Kong can make extradition bill with Taiwan but not mainland China? What double standards is this? If next time some Hong Konger decide to commit crime in mainland China and fled to Hong Kong to escape extradition, then why do you stoop so low as to defend murderers from facing justice? And one of the five demands is for all those HK rioters to be set free and cleared of all rioting charges, so why should the authorities bow down to their demands? Who gives Washington the right to interfere in Hong Kong and Beijing affairs? Hong Kong is not part of the United States, its part of China under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, so why can't Beijing implement HK National Security Law?
    1
  20906.  @phantasmaleye3879  Let me ask you again: What crime did your uncle commit to end up in jail? He's your uncle so of course he'll try and tell you that he's being mistreated in order to gain your sympathy as a family member, but what crime did he commit?
    1
  20907.  @phantasmaleye3879  You're the one who brought up your uncle here into the discussion, and you refuse to disclose his crime. If he commit crime in mainland China, then shouldn't he be punished according to Chinese laws? He claims he was tortured and mistreated, but where's the proof, when he could be using his family ties with you to gain your sympathy? If you refuse to reveal more information then all you are giving is anecdotal evidence yourself, which I cants even verify because you refuse to disclose what crime your uncle commited.
    1
  20908.  @phantasmaleye3879  So you're using a single anecdotal example as proof that China's legal system is broken? You never said he shouldn't be punished, so it implies that your uncle deserves what he got, then why can't you disclose his crime then? I have no info about what crime your uncle committed and no means to verify your story, so what makes you think Chinese legal system is broken, when you refuse to give details? Did you know that China is experimenting with Artificial Intelligence judges, cyber-courts, and verdicts delivered on chat apps and encouraging digitization to streamline case-handling within its sprawling court system using cyberspace and technologies like blockchain and cloud computing? Video: AI judges via chat app: the brave new world of China's digital courts youtu.be/yuUN6VfWF-Q
    1
  20909.  @phantasmaleye3879  Since you refuse to disclose the details of your uncle's crime, then I can only make assumptions like it's corruption or something to that extent to warrant him getting jailed. Since you appear to agree that your uncle deserves his punishment then what's your problem with China's legal system then? How exactly is China's legal system broken? Could you explain why you think Artificial Intelligence systems isn't reliable? Here's a video of China's constantly improving our legal system. According to the latest World Bank Doing Business 2020 report, China has topped the world in terms of the quality of its judicial process. Video: Come Together: China's progress in building a law-based government youtu.be/NiZi-N_Cqjk In 2019, the number of registered criminal cases in China dropped by 4.1 percent. The caseload in eight categories of serious violent crimes also fell by 10.3 percent, making China one of the safest countries in the world. On the world stage, China continues to improve and develop its legal system and actively follow and safeguard international norms and laws in its drive for shared benefits and win-win cooperation worldwide.
    1
  20910.  @phantasmaleye3879  "神州 Shenzhou I am so done with you. I send you the answers to your questions" You don't even answer my simple question of what crime your uncle committed, and you seem to agree that he deserves it, which is why I assume it's probably he got arrested for corruption or something to that effect. You said your uncle was mistreated and tortured, then where's your proof? It's possible that your uncle is trying to use his family bond with you to gain your sympathy. What mistreatment and torture was your uncle subject to then, you tell me? You've given me an unverifiable anecdotal source and hardly any information, yet you're claiming that you answered my questions? And you said that you don't think Artificial Intelligence systems is reliable, then why can't you explain why? The fact is that you are anti-China that's all and you care absolutely nothing for China's interests nor do you wish to see China succeed.
    1
  20911.  @phantasmaleye3879  You're intentionally ambiguous because you don't want others to verify your claims, so you give vague information about your uncle's arrest and refuse to disclose the details of your uncle's crime. Sleep deprivation? Is that it? Sleep deprivation does not constitute torture or violation of human rights by many countries. Memos signed by Steven G. Bradbury in May 2005 claimed that forced sleep deprivation for up to 180 hours (​7 1⁄2 days) by shackling a diapered prisoner to the ceiling did not constitute torture for example. In 2006, Australian Federal Attorney-General Philip Ruddock argued that sleep deprivation does not constitute torture. Again, it depends on the degree of crime your uncle committed, so why are you so reluctant to reveal his crime? Stealing a loaf of bread? Corruption? Pirating music? What is his crime? You're clearly anti-China, why pretend you're not anti-China? All this while you've been mocking China's success under the Communist Party of China, because your anti-China so why pretend otherwise?
    1
  20912.  @phantasmaleye3879  You refuse to give me any more information about your uncle's arrest, such as what crime he committed, so how am I to verify your anecdotal evidence? I've already shown that some countries consider sleep deprivation not a violation of human rights, so how is it against the rule of law? You're only using your own personal feelings as evidence that's all, and if sleep deprivation is considered acceptable in China then how is it against the rule of law? It's just like earlier you suddenly change the definition of "prosper" to suit your own definition, even after I cited the definition of prosper. You're anti-China, you care absolutely nothing for China's interests nor do you wish to see China succeed. So why pretend that you aren't anti-China when you clearly are? Granted, the Communist Party of China is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  20913.  @phantasmaleye3879  You expressed anti-China attitudes against Chinese companies like Huawei, Tencent through WeChat, and even when I bring up China's Artificial Intelligence judges and digital court, you just claim they're unreliable without bothering to explain. So far you have said nothing remotely positive about China, so why pretend that you aren't anti-China when you clearly are? According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china
    1
  20914.  @phantasmaleye3879  What is it with you and the word "ambiguous"? How many times have you used it? And in China, the government controls the companies for China's benefit, whereas in United States, its actually the American corporations that control the government for their own profit. Americans often complain that the corporations control their government such as the US Oil companies instigating wars in the Middle East to control the oil. About poverty rate in China, China has lifted 700 million people out of poverty in just 40 years, whereas the whole rest of the world only lifted 150 million by comparison. Video: Historical achievement: Take 700 million out of poverty youtu.be/CljWffPgmG8 "China has lifted 728 million people out of poverty by international standards. The whole rest of the world has only lifted 152 million." - John Ross, Well-known columnist in UK, Former Deputy mayor of London. You're just anti-China, not once did you even said anything remotely positive about China, so why pretend that you aren't anti-China? You care absolutely nothing for China's interests nor do you wish to see China succeed that's all.
    1
  20915.  @phantasmaleye3879  Besides AI Judge, China recently unveiled the world's first Artificial Intelligence News Anchor. Video: World's first AI news anchor debuts in China youtu.be/MHPI1uH9llU Video: Xinhua unveils world's first female AI news anchor youtu.be/5iZuffHPDAw
    1
  20916.  @phantasmaleye3879  China is even employing 3D technology, introducing world’s first 3D Artificial Intelligence News Anchor. Video: China Sogou introduces world’s first 3D AI News Anchor youtu.be/k-1Ji7jzFGI This is different from the 2D Artificial Intelligence News Anchor Video: Meet the real-life news presenter behind the world’s first AI anchor youtu.be/YOpQpunuRfw
    1
  20917.  @phantasmaleye3879  China Uncensored constantly paint negative image of China and "demonise" our country, that's why anti-China sentiment is rising, especially among those people who never even set foot in China and see what life is really like here for themselves.
    1
  20918.  @phantasmaleye3879  What proper reasoning and evidence? China Uncensored channel once claimed that Nanjing Massacre Memorial sold "wartime rap pr0n" but everyone knows that's is banned in China.
    1
  20919.  @phantasmaleye3879  Here's the video youtu.be/xBW1lQw_WrI?t=387
    1
  20920.  @phantasmaleye3879  Irrelevant? You're the one who said (and I quote): "Besides they always use proper reasoning and evidence to back up their claims" and now that I shown you a video of them blatantly lying, you just dismiss it as irrelevant?
    1
  20921.  @phantasmaleye3879  I've been to Nanjing Memorial and found that what China Uncensored said to be untrue. And you the one who claim that they always use proper reasoning and evidence to back up their claims, so how is it irrelevant? I already proven your statement wrong.
    1
  20922.  @phantasmaleye3879  What do you mean by you can't go to Nanjing Memorial to find out? Everyone knows that pronography is banned in China, why would Nanjing Memorial sell those videos? China Uncensored has been caught blatantly lying, but you just refuse to admit it, so you claim that it's not relevant. China Uncensored has been painting negative image of China to people who haven't even been to China and see what life is like here for yourself. Here's a short 2-min video of the beautiful night view of 11 Chinese cities in China. Video: 中国大陆11座城市美丽夜景 - Beautiful Night View of 11 Chinese Cities in 2 Minutes youtu.be/mzR8Scsd33g (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  20923. When did I ever said anything about USA here? Indian troops also trespass Chinese territory in Doklam to obstruct PLA road construction efforts. India does not claim Doklam/Donglong as part of its territory, so why is Indian Army sending its troops there? As far as I know, why would China stop investment in India? Indians themselves have expressed the desire boycott Chinese goods many times, whereas Chinese government always want to promote better economic cooperation with other countries. Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai even proposed the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence 和平共处五项原则 to help define China-India relations.
    1
  20924. President Vladmir Putin has repeated voiced his support of President Xi's Belt and Road Initiative. As for India, even if New Delhi rejects Beijing's offer to join BRI, Beijing will respect New Delhi's decision regardless.
    1
  20925. Rohit Maity Yes I did say that in another comment. Chinese loans have high interest, because it is a risky investment into volatile countries like Pakistan and African countries, and higher interests are needed to justify for the risks involve. That's why Western banks refuse to approve loans to these countries due to the high risk involve in building infrastructure in such conflict prone regions. Otherwise, nobody is stopping Pakistan and other countries from borrowing from other banks besides Chinese banks if they want to. Chinese government don't recruit Africans to be engineers, because they simply aren't qualified enough to lead the projects. Chinese engineers are still more experienced at building infrastructure than local African engineers, so they are hired. About Doklam, You say its because of defense treaty, but is Bhutan being attacked here? If not, then why is Indian army being called into Doklam when it is a territorial dispute by our countries? China has produced evidence in the form of the 1890 treaty (Convention of Calcutta) showing that Doklam is part of Chinese territory. But what evidence has Bhutan shown for its claims to Doklam? Nothing. Yet India just believe Bhutan when it says Doklam is theirs? According to your article, how did China threaten India? All the PLA said is that such actions would result in “a negative influence” on stability along the border that's all. Do you see PLA retaliating by deploying missiles to India-China border? When did China oppose India building a road with Bangladesh? Did PLA troops actually physically stop Indian troops from building a road to Bangladesh? Otherwise how can you claim India can't build a road to Bangladesh because of China? How is China going to stop India from building a road to Bangladesh?
    1
  20926. It's the story of the Tortoise and the Hare. NATO (Hare) is exhausting their list of sanctions on Russia and running out of weapons to send to Ukraine, without reaching the finish line. Whereas Russia (Tortoise) has weathered the storm of sanctions yet is making steady, incremental progress towards the finish lines.
    1
  20927.  @ValBoon997  "神州 Shenzhou trying to defend the origin it's obvious the family tree of the virus from sars which originally came from your land." What logic is this? Just because Covid-19 shares the same family tree as SARS, suddenly means that Covid-19 originated in my land? MERS (Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome) is also from the same family as SARS and Covid-19 but does that mean that MERS is from China? MERS is also called 2012 novel coronavirus for crying out loud.
    1
  20928. Majority of those Hong Kong protestors are high school kids, who haven't even graduated from school, yet they already think they know how to best govern Hong Kong? Their teenage minds haven't even matured and they haven't even stepped out into the real working world of adults, yet they already gotten swept up by idealistic political fervor.
    1
  20929.  @zackk4969  It's the Western country's athletes loss if Western countries decide to boycott the 2022 Beijing Olympics. More gold medals for China, Russia and other countries then.
    1
  20930.  @kaypee4704  China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. Everyone could blatantly see how China was struggling with the outbreak in Wuhan, building a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised. China also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. So other countries could see how seriously China was taking the coronavirus, yet Western countries didn't bother to prepare themselves then how can you blame China for the Western countries disregard for the virus?
    1
  20931. 轮子只靠黑中国吃饭。
    1
  20932. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20933.  @Andy-P  So if KMT wins on the next Taiwan election, it would mean that the majority of Taiwan people want less cross-strait tension. Because actual conflict breaking out in the Taiwan straits would be a disaster for both Taiwan and the mainland.
    1
  20934.  @bartonlee3594  "Yes, let's hope Taiwan stays independent." If you claim Taiwan is independent, then why is it that Taiwan cannot join the UN like an independent country can? What's preventing it from doing so?
    1
  20935.  @MarkYeung1  Only a minority of people in Taiwan want independence, the vast majority of Taiwan people want the status quo to continue. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  20936.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou Hong Kong showed what a CCP promise is worth." And what is it worth? Doesn't Hong Kong today still maintain their own government, their own passport, own currency, own market economy, financial capital status, and so on?
    1
  20937.  @biscottigelato8574  "Nobody in Taiwan wants to give up market economy, human rights and democracy." It doesn't have to be that way. China is uniquely the only nation in the world to allow multiple political systems to exist within our borders, under the One Country, Two System policy. As long as Taiwan agrees to full reunification with the mainland, then Taiwan will be allowed to keep everything as it is (their government, their passport, their currency, their market economy, even their army!) but be considered fully reunified with China. (It's as though North Korea and South Korea both agree to reunify into a single country, Korea, while allowing both sides to keep their respective governments. That's the One Country, Two Systems policy in a nutshell.)
    1
  20938.  @deuxpiecesSaintLouis  If you claim Taiwan is independent, then why is it that Taiwan cannot join the UN like an independent country can? What's preventing it from doing so?
    1
  20939.  @deuxpiecesSaintLouis  _"神州 Shenzhou why does Taiwan call itself 'republic of China' and write it on their passport,"_ Because Taiwan considers itself as part of China. Since there hasn't been any Taiwan declaration of independence, nor any amendments to its constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  20940.  @deuxpiecesSaintLouis  "And why do they elect their own representatives and président?" Because China is uniquely the only nation in the world that allows multiple systems to exist within our borders, under the One Country Two System policy. For example, Hong Kong has their own separate government, separate passport, currency, etc, but is considered part of China after the 1997 handover. You said: "And why do taiwaneses have visa free entrances in Europe (while Chineses have to Ask for a VISA)?" Because China's system allows multiple passports, for mainland China, Macau, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Other countries grant different levels of priority to different Chinese passport holders.
    1
  20941.  @deuxpiecesSaintLouis  "Taïwan on the other end is a democracy." Taiwan had been under authoritarian rule for more than half its life. For decades, the authoritarian single-party KMT ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, and General Chiang kai-Shek (like you said) was a dictator who jailed/executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But Taiwan's economy flourished under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, resulting in the Taiwan Miracle. Taiwan's GDP grew by 360 percent between 1965 and 1986, earning it a place as one of the Four Asian Tigers/Dragons for its rapid economic growth. Only in the 1990s, when democracy was introduced to Taiwan (because the U.S would cut off weapons supply to Taiwan if the KMT didn't comply with political reforms) that Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Today, Taiwan's economy is stagnant, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising, and Taiwan graduates are seeking jobs in mainland China.
    1
  20942. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20943. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  20944. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  20945. Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20946. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20947. Even Canada acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20948.  indiasuperclean6969  Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20949.  @tobiasrekker5376  Exactly. America's wealth was built upon the backs of "free labor" and the occupation of Native American lands, including their resources like gold.
    1
  20950.  indiasuperclean6969  Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20951.  indiasuperclean6969  Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20952. +EngSci Defender Are you accusing me of being a wumao? When did I ever mentioned anything about the Chinese Communist Party at all in this thread?
    1
  20953. We are experiencing a tectonic shift from a uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (i.e USA's) towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices.
    1
  20954.  @DJ-ti8lm  American healthcare workers look overwhelmed, overworked, exhausted, ill-equipped, facing shortage of masks, gloves, goggles, faceshields, PPE suits, ventilators. Whereas Chinese doctors and nurses and they look well-equipped in comparison.
    1
  20955.  @DJ-ti8lm  Here's a reporter inside Wuhan makeshift hospital and the Chinese doctors and nurses may look tired (who won't with 8 hours a day) but they certainly look well-equipped with face masks, gloves, goggles, hazmat suits and they don't look like they're overwhelmed. They even organise dancing lessons for the aunties in quarantine. Video: A closer look into Wuhan's makeshift hospital youtu.be/RDrCrgC5VXw
    1
  20956.  @DJ-ti8lm  Dr Li Wenliang was spreading rumours about the coronavirus being SARS (which is clearly untrue, Covid-19 is not SARS) so the government stepped in to stop the spread of unproven rumours that's all. And he wasn't arrested, he merely signed a document not to spread unproven rumours that's all and he returned to work afterwards. He passed away because of Covid-19, not because the CPC killed him. About China's tactics, the government rushed to built a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised. Video: Huoshenshan: the hospital built in 10 days in China over coronavirus outbreak youtu.be/l2QfufpwfdY Kudos to the Chinese construction workers who worked hard to build those hospitals. China also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. Video: Time-lapse video shows how Leishenshan hospital completed in 12 days youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk But what did USA do? The USA had 3 months to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but they did nothing.
    1
  20957. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20958. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20959. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20960. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20961. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20962. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20963. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  20964.  @catch10110  Polls have indicated that around 80% of Russians support Putin's action in the Russian special military operation, are you sure he's carrying emotional baggage? Biden certainly is, just look at Hunter's "Laptop from Hell" and why isn't his son put behind bars given the incriminating evidence on that laptop?
    1
  20965.  @beastmode8203  How will U.S prevent it? The U.S slapping sanctions on Russia, Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, etc, is actually causing these countries to band together.
    1
  20966.  @beastmode8203  Because you have cited absolutely nothing to support your argument. The U.S President Joe Biden stated in his public address that the U.S does not support Taiwan independence, and that the U.S policy towards the island has not changed. The 1972 Shanghai Communique pledged that the U.S acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China and that the United States Government does not challenge that position. ... Source: Wikipedia: Shanghai Communique Even Biden said: "Don’t. Don’t. Don’t’" regarding the use of WMDs, so it's highly unlikely that the scenario your are alluding to will take place at all.
    1
  20967.  @beastmode8203  You have cited absolutely nothing to support your argument. The U.S President Joe Biden stated in his public address that the U.S does not support Taiwan independence, and that the U.S policy towards the island has not changed. Even with regards to Russia, President Biden said: "Don’t. Don’t. Don’t."
    1
  20968.  @junebug8485  The thing is, Russia has the resources that matter, such as oil, gas, wheat, fertilizer, etc. These may appear to be just simple commodities, but it's a fact that they are always in demand in the world. Russia not only has an advanced military, but even NASA is utterly dependent on Russian rocket-engines to send humans into space.
    1
  20969.  @garam6555  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    1
  20970. +Ashutosh Sharma Because you appeared to abuse angry words and even hurled vulgarities such as C**t Commie P**ssy so it gives off the impression that you are somehow angry at China's "communism". Despite our political system, China even launched the world's first quantum satellite Micus 墨子 in 2016, and proved that the quantum entanglement phenomena works at distances above the stratosphere, and smashing the previous world record on the ground. Quantum satellite achieves 'spooky action' at record distance video: youtube.com/watch?v=4QlcKuxDGrs In a nutshell, quantum entanglement is when two subatomic particles can become "entangled" and somehow influence each other states, seemingly regardless of the distance involved. One particle could be located on the surface of the Moon, the other on the surface on the Earth, and they can still influence each other's states. Previously, scientists have shown that this phenomena works at a distance of 143 km in the Canary Islands, but China's quantum satellite enabled two ground stations (Delinghua and Lijiang) located 1200 km apart to communicate. This is a great breakthrough for science, because it proves quantum entanglement occurs even at distance above the stratosphere, and quantum communication may someday form the foundation of space communications. It also happens to be extremely difficult to hack and provides high security communications. So what kind of advice are you giving me? I am happy and proud of my country's achievements. But are you happy yourself with your country's achievements? Why do you seem to hurl angry words at other countries for their successes?
    1
  20971. +Ashutosh Sharma You even made disgusting remarks about licking President Xi's semen off his toilet floor! Why make such lewd remarks if you yourself aren't angry? Its okay to be proud of your country's achievements, by why bitterly mock other countries for their achievements? Doesn't that show that you yourself lack spiritual development internally, when you intentionally lash out at others? Besides our quantum satellite in space, in 2017 Chinese scientists also made quantum computing machine that is 24,000 times faster than its international counterparts and may dwarf the processing power of existing supercomputers. A team of researchers from University of Science and Technology of China made their announcement at a press conference in the Shanghai Institute for Advanced Studies of University of Science and Technology of China. World's first quantum computing machine made in China Source: economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/science/worlds-first-quantum-computing-machine-made-in-china/articleshow/58492628.cms 'The world's first quantum computing machine' Video: youtube.com/watch?v=Vw1bKuSe49A The test results show the sampling rate of this prototype is at least 24,000 times faster than international counterparts and at the same time, the prototype quantum computing machine is 10 to 100 times faster than the first electronic computer, ENIAC, and the first transistor computer, TRADIC, in running the classical algorithm. As for the future, the world is not static and is always changing with the times. Change is the only constant and some people just remain stuck at one period of history and refuse to change. Even beliefs themselves change with the times, and not too long ago, many people believed in gods and a higher existence (and some people still do today) but still the future is always uncertain. Maybe gods really do exist, but people today just can't see them or lack the abilities to detect their presence..
    1
  20972. +Ashutosh Sharma China doesn't allow India into Nuclear Suppliers Group because India did not sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty whereas all other countries that have membership in NSG have signed the NPT. So why India gets a special case here, to join NSG without first signing NPT? Also, India is not a close ally of China, and have been opposing China numerous times, such as when India provided sanctuary to 14th Dalai Lama after he fled from Tibet. This increases China's suspicion towards India for harboring Dalai Lama. Furthermore, Pakistan has been friendly to China since the beginning and supported us at every turn, so by denying India entry into NSG, we are doing our ally a favor. Why help those who treat us as enemy, and forsake our long-time ally, our "iron-brother" Pakistan? About the UN Security Council, the United Nations was formed around 1945 by the victorious Allies and they made 5 countries permanent members which are United States of America, the United Kingdom, France, Soviet Union (Russia) and Republic of China. Ever since then, these countries have the power to veto any UN decision and its likely that we will keep this power to ourselves. India at that time was still a British Colony (Republic of India was founded in 1947) so it wasn't part of the UN Security Council, else Britain would have gained 2 votes instead of 1 vote. You hate authoritarian regime? Does that mean you are happy with your democracy? Why lash out angrily at authoritarian regime that has proven to be more successful than your democracy? China is authoritarian regime yet we have made great advances in sciences, supercomputing, quantum computing and have become a modern space nation. Quantum computing (which are more powerful than even supercomputers) have multiple uses such as help scientists solve difficult equations in research, for drug testing, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, and so on. It can also be applied to military uses such as hacking and cybersecurity, and even stealth submarines! A submarine with a quantum navigation system could operate underwater for more than 3 months without the need to surface for positioning satellite signals. After operating for 100 days underwater the captain would still be able to pinpoint the vessel’s position in the Pacific Ocean with a margin of error of just a few hundred metres. China building world’s biggest quantum research facility source: scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2110563/china-building-worlds-biggest-quantum-research-facility As for how is China any different from the USA, well, China today is at peace and not at war with any country, as our People's Liberation Army troops has had zero actual combat experience since our last major war in 1979. Instead of making war on others, China is developing our country, building roads, infrastructure, railways, highways, bridges in China as well as in other countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, etc, and even in African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Angola, etc. China is home to the world's largest highspeed railway system, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length, speed and comfort. Here is a fun video about balancing a coin, a pen, a smartphone and an upside down bottle near the window of a moving hi-speed train in China. Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph video: youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE But the USA is a warmonger, involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, etc, even in the 21st century! USA is bombing those countries, destroying property and cutting off those countries heads (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now USA is eyeing Syria and the Assad Regime is next on the list.
    1
  20973. +Ashutosh Sharma Then why India doesn't even want to sign the NPT, but still wants to get into the NSG? If India's intention is to start proliferating nuclear weapons then why should China let you into NSG? Pakistan is its own sovereign country (as recognized by India) and Pakistan has been a good friend to China, so we help them develop infrastructure, through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor project. Pakistan is still unstable government and with civil unrest, so hopefully, through CPEC, there will be work for Pakistanis, and the economic development will help stabilize the country and help it prosper. The Aksai Chin is a word where aksai literally means "white brook and chin refers to China. Also, back in 1950s, Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai proposed the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence 和平共处五项原则 in his talk to the Indian delegation at the start of the negotiations that took place in Beijing from December 1953 to April 1954 between representatives of the Chinese and Indian governments on relations between the two countries in Tibet. But then Indian PM Nehru provided sanctuary to 14th Dalai Lama, a wanted fugitive by China, and that makes China suspicious of India's intentions regarding Tibet. So why should China admit India into NSG, when India has been politically opposing China? Even in Doklam standoff, Chinese PLA troops were building a road at our border with Bhutan, but the Indian Army send troops across Chinese territory to blockade China, even when Doklam/Donglong is not part of Indian territory in the first place. If you treat China like the enemy, then don't be surprised if Chinese people starts treating you like one as well. Where did you heard that China kills babies alive? Is this another one of your anti-China propaganda? Besides China's advances in supercomputers and quantum computing, China is also advancing rapidly in Artificial Intelligence, and we recently unveiled the world's first AI News Anchor. The government is also funding many companies to promote AI research. Even in everyday mobile phone usage Chinese mobile phone apps are just as good as USA and sometimes even better. Video: AI in China youtube.com/watch?v=4Gk6mxKXKTk For example, in China with your smartphone, you can pay for services, shop online, make purchases, have them shipped to your doorstep, order food, book dental appoints, book airline tickets, book taxis, pay the fare, etc, all just using a single app, WeChat whereas the Western WhatsApp is not as useful and that's why WhatsApp is copying China's WeChat. Source: WhatsApp looks to copy China's Tencent-owned WeChat afr.com/technology/apps/business/whatsapp-looks-to-copy-chinas-tencentowned-wechat-20170411-gvihge
    1
  20974. Ashutosh Sharma As far as I know, Youtube is not banned in China, merely blocked, and people use VPN to access Western websites like YT. Chinese people knew what it was like to eat dirt to survive and being paid peanuts but we persevered to make China a success through hard work. According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. As for India, you said "Never will be people raised above poverty line without use of force with India being only exception." which is wrong, because many European countries have lifted people out of poverty without the use of force, especially the Scandinavian countries like Finland, Norwar, and so on. I have never said "everything is Hunky Dory in China and rest of the whole world is wrong." From where did you get that impression? You finally answered by question. If India didn't signed the NPT, then China reserves the right not to admit India into NSG that's all. Why is it called force fed lies? You refuse to sign the NPT yet want to blame China for not letting you in? Pakistan acquired nuclear weapons when the Pakistani scientist, Abdul Qadeer Khan, obtained knowledge of uranium enrichment process due to lack security from a Netherlands company (URENCO Group) and brought the knowledge back to Pakistan at the end of 1974. The most difficult step in building a nuclear weapon is the production of fissile material, as such, his work in producing fissile material as head of the Kahuta Project was pivotal to Pakistan developing the capability to detonate a nuclear bomb by the end of 1984. As for North Korea, in 1963, N. Korea asked the Soviet Union for help in developing nuclear weapons, but was refused. The Soviet Union agreed to help N. Korea develop a peaceful nuclear energy program, including training nuclear scientists. Later, China similarly rejected North Korean requests for help with developing nuclear weapons. The U.S. government had also agreed to facilitate the supply of two light water reactors (which are "more proliferation-resistant but not "proliferation proof") to N. Korea. By 2002, Pakistan had admitted that North Korea had gained access to Pakistan's nuclear technology in the late 1990s. Source: Wikipedia: Pakistan and weapons of mass destruction wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction Source: Wikipedia: North Korea and weapons of mass destruction wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korea_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction So I fail to see how China has any involvement in Pakistan or North Korea acquiring nuclear weapons. It just looks like you are constantly blaming China for all of India's woes that's all, from what you keep describing so far. Now for more of China's achievements, China built the world's largest radio telescope, the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) also known as Tianyan 天眼 "Eye of the Heavens" that will help scientists learn more about the universe's early days, detect low-frequency gravitational waves and hunt for signals that may have been produced by distant alien civilizations. With a dish the size of 30 football fields, FAST is by far the largest single-aperture telescope in the world (though arrays that link up multiple radio dishes cover more ground). The previous record holder in the field is the 1,000-foot-wide (300 meters) Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico. Source: China Finishes Building World's Largest Radio Telescope. space.com/33357-china-largest-radio-telescope-alien-life.html The larger the radio dish, the more sensitive it is to faraway signals, and FAST's potential to discover an alien civilization will be 5 to 10 times that of current equipment, as it can see farther and darker planets. Already, the radio telescope has discovered 44 pulsars since its inception in 2016! Video: 44 pulsars identified by China's FAST telescope youtube.com/watch?v=t9nySMjiUzw Therefore, China is making great contributions to global space exploration, astronomy, supercomputing, quantum computing, artificial intelligence, high speed railway, and many many more. Why is it you seem so "concerned" for us Chinese people? Haven't you seen the numerous Chinese tourists visiting countries all over the world, spending coin and stimulating your local economies? Aren't your schools and universities accepting many international Chinese exchange students to study? Haven't you seen Chinese scientists and researchers collaborating with foreign companies in R&D sectors? Chinese people aren't stupid or ignorant (like you seem to believe) we know China is not perfect and has many flaws, but under our current system China is flourishing, so why do we have to change our system? Because the West thinks so? Have you taken a good look at the West on how Trump got elected, or Britain exiting the European Union?
    1
  20975.  @echelon2k8  "神州 Shenzhou You're clueless. The Tiananmen Square Massacre isn't about what happened in the Square." You literally just called it "Tiananmen Square Massacre" then how is it not about the Square itself? And the Tiananmen Square Massacre is clearly a Myth. According to Jay Matthews, reporter for The Washington Post, as far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square and all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. Search for an article entitled: The Myth of Tiananmen:And the price of a passive press (By Jay Mathews) to see what I mean. "If nothing happened, where is Tank Man today? Why hasn't he been either seen or heard of by the public since his removal?" What is the name and identity of this Tank Man then?
    1
  20976.  @chrishannis1  serpentza and c-milk speak for themselves, they pretend to care about Chinese people, but the truth is that they don't. serpentza calls ethnic Miao clothing as fake costumes worn to promote tourism, and c-milk calls his half-Chinese daughter "it" or "that".
    1
  20977.  The Hate Factory  Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According to Gregory Clark, all verified eyewitness accounts present in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    1
  20978.  The Hate Factory  Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies (By Gregory Clark) ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053
    1
  20979.  Гео́ргий Константи́нович Жу́ков  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  20980.  @zackk4969  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"? Video: Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' youtu.be/DPt-zXn05ac
    1
  20981.  @zackk4969  “Diary of a Madman”.《狂人日记》 is a work of fiction by Lu Xun, then why are you confusing fiction with reality?
    1
  20982.  @zackk4393  But according to Wikipedia: A Madman's Diary, the diary form was inspired by Nikolai Gogol's short story "Diary of a Madman", as was the idea of the madman who sees reality more clearly than those around him. It's a work of fiction, not based on a true story.
    1
  20983. After surveying kids from US, UK and China: Chinese kids' dream: Astronaut American/UK kids' dream: YouTuber
    1
  20984.  @violatedmonkey  So you're admitting that you can buy solar chargers in China? That means China has electricity isn't it? Additionally, how does he access the Internet if China doesn't have electricity?
    1
  20985.  @asdfghjkl92213  Hey you're back. How'd you post your comment if China has no electricity?
    1
  20986.  @asdfghjkl92213  So you charged at night where there is no sunlight, that means China has electricity for you to charge isn't it?
    1
  20987.  @violatedmonkey  He has already shown that he charged his phone at night, that means your solar charger suggestion was wrong, and there is indeed electricity in China.
    1
  20988.  @violatedmonkey  2/3? Where did you get such a figure that 2/3 of China is in blackout at the moment?
    1
  20989.  @violatedmonkey  I'm asking you "Where did you get such a figure that 2/3 of China is in blackout at the moment?"
    1
  20990.  @violatedmonkey  Why do you think President Xi Jinping is so horrible? President Xi has shown to be a strong and competent leader, able to guide China through the Covid-19 crisis and having the situation largely under control in China. As for China banning Australia coal, that was over 1 year ago in 2020, what has that even got to do with China's power issues at the moment?
    1
  20991.  @violatedmonkey  But China banned Australian coal in 2020, that's over 1 year ago, so how does that affect China's power shortage in 2021?
    1
  20992.  @violatedmonkey  There's nothing wrong with Winnie the Pooh character (and contrary to popular belief, Winnie the Pooh isn't banned in China) but using the character to compare to President Xi, it becomes a racist caricature, because it's comparing a Yellow bear with small eyes to an Asian man.
    1
  20993.  @violatedmonkey  About the Social Credit System, many foreigners often complain Chinese people spit in public, smoke in non-smoking areas, jump queues, disobey traffic rules, jay walk, drive on wrong side of the road, speed through red lights, etc when not all Chinese people are like that. We Chinese feel embarrassed that such bad people represent China overseas, so the government introduce social credit system to discourage such bad behaviour and promote better behaviour instead. This is a meritocratic system where good behaviour is rewarded and bad behaviour penalised. But if such people persist with bad behaviour, until their scores fall to become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisances of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again.
    1
  20994.  @violatedmonkey  You're saying that this "trickle down" effect took over a year to manifest itself? Clearly this 2021 power issue is unrelated to China banning Australia coal in 2020.
    1
  20995.  @violatedmonkey  China banning Australian coal in 2020, over 1 year ago has literally nothing to do with the power issues in China in 2021.
    1
  20996.  @violatedmonkey  Where in China's social credit system do you get points for talking about President Xi and the Communist Party of China? How is President Xi poison to the world? The Harvard Kennedy School’s Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation co-sponsored a survey on global perceptions of international leaders and President Xi had the highest approval rating, both at home and abroad. Xi earned a composite 8.7 rating (out of 10), beating Russian President Vladimir Putin (8.1) for the top spot.
    1
  20997.  @violatedmonkey  How is President Xi emulating Adolf Hitler? Hitler promoted antisemitism and racial supremacy by demonising the Jews, so if President Xi is emulating Hitler then we should be seeing demonisation of ethnic minorities in China and promoting Han supremacy under Xi. But ethnic minorities in China enjoy privileges over the Han, they aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Ethnic minorities enjoy other privileges such as tax exemption, priority in healthcare, free education up to 15 years, government bursaries. During Gaokao, ethnic minorities have lowered admission criteria compared to Han, so isn't this the reverse scenario of Hitler's antisemitism?
    1
  20998.  @violatedmonkey  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States are the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  20999.  @violatedmonkey  About nuclear weapon threat, the AUKUS deal meant that Australia will receive nuclear submarines from the US and the UK, even though Australia is a non-nuclear country and also a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) that forbids the spread of nuclear weapons/technology to non-nuclear states. If Australia wants to become a nuclear country, then they become potential targets for nuclear strikes, isn't it? Australians made the choice to purchase nuclear submarines, then they'll naturally become a potential target for nuclear strikes, isn't it?
    1
  21000.  @violatedmonkey  Explain how is President Xi Jinping crazy? He's willing to tackle the issue of corruption in China, and he enjoys massive support from Chinese people for his policies and he has shown competence in handling the Covid-19 situation, whereas it is out of control in many countries around the world.
    1
  21001.  @violatedmonkey  The character Winnie the Pooh isn't even banned in China, here's 2018 Shanghai Disneyland The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh On Ride HD POV with Full Queue youtu.be/6uVYGzHLZww But if racists want to use the character Winnie the Pooh to represent President Xi, then it becomes a racist caricature to compare a Yellow bear with small eyes to an Asian man. It would be as racist as if people suddenly started comparing Obama to King Kong for example. Those 4.6 million deaths were due to other countries neglect or inability in to deal with Covid-19. China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain out of millions in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought.
    1
  21002.  @violatedmonkey  About the gag orders on doctors, that happened after China already had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019, so what's your point when countries had already been informed about the virus? And buying up global PPE, China was in urgent need of PPE, and your countries choose to put up your PPE for sale, then why can't Chinese fork out money to buy PPE? Your countries put PPE up for sale, so Chinese people bought them and shipped them back to China because China urgently needed PPE at that time. In fact, before 2019, your PPE was Made-In-China and Chinese people are buying back PPE that was previously produced in China. And about selling inferior products back to the world, China was swamped by huge global demand for PPE, and China's production couldn't keep up with the demand so the quality of PPE suffered as a result. Some smaller companies in China also set up factories to cater to the demand, but they had no previous experience making PPE, and their qualifications had not been approved by the government, but other countries already made the purchase of PPE without informing Chinese government of the transaction. About human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus, there was no confirmation of human-to-human transmission of Covid-19 back in 2019. Human-to-human transmission was confirmed on 21 Jan 2020, and that's when the government began locking down Wuhan shortly after this discovery. Video: China confirms human-to-human transmission of new coronavirus youtu.be/XPbdMRXQhdE (Dated to 21 Jan 2020) About international travel, except for chartered flights, no international passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since its lockdown on January 23, according to the Hubei Airport Group Company.
    1
  21003.  @violatedmonkey  Again, Winnie the Pooh isn't banned, and there's nothing wrong with the character, but comparing President Xi Jinping to that character is racist caricature because it's comparing a yellow-tone bear with small eyes to an Asian man. It would be just as racist as hypothetically comparing Obama to King Kong.
    1
  21004.  @violatedmonkey  Dr Peter Forster, a geneticist Cambridge University has identified 3 Covid-19 strains (A, B, C) Type-A is believed to have leaped from bats to humans (animal-to-human transmission) and Type-B is mutated from Type-A and found predominantly in China while Type-C is mutated from Type-B and found predominantly outside China, in places like Singapore. Video: No proof that Covid-19 originated in Wuhan: Peter Forster youtu.be/AQQf2yoymu0 The interesting thing is that the Europe and America suffer predominantly from Type-A virus (animal-to-human transmission) and Type-A is predominantly found outside East Asia, in Europeans and Americans.
    1
  21005.  @violatedmonkey  You can share your video, then why can't I share CGTN video? You can tell me to watch your video but you refuse to watch my video interviewing Cambridge geneticist? Here's Tulane virologist Robert Garry, PhD, and a team of researchers analyzed the genome sequence of the novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and found no evidence that the virus was made in a laboratory or otherwise engineered. Video: Virologist explains origins of COVID-19 youtu.be/YLykxJqTBpU
    1
  21006.  @violatedmonkey  And I have already shown that Winnie the Pooh isn't banned in China, but using a yellow-tone bear with small eyes to compare with an Asian man like President Xi Jinping is racist caricature, just as racist as hypothetically comparing Obama to King Kong.
    1
  21007.  @violatedmonkey  Look at this channel that you're commenting on, you're literally on CGTN so what is your point? The Cambridge geneticist Dr Peter Foster has shown that there is no proof that Covid-19 originated in Wuhan, and so did Tulane virologist Robert Garry analysing Covid-19 and found no evidence it was engineered in a lab.
    1
  21008.  @violatedmonkey  If you think that it's hysterical to laugh at a racist caricature comparing a yellow tone bear with an Asian man, then you are exhibiting racist behavior just like laughing at a comparison between Obama and King Kong, which is another racist caricature.
    1
  21009.  @violatedmonkey  So what are the actions by the Communist Party of China at the start of all this? China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019, the gag order on doctors came afterwards so it would have no effect on the world receiving information. In 2019, there was no confirmation of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus. Human-to-human transmission was confirmed on 21st January 2020 and Wuhan was locked down shortly afterwards. Video: China confirms human-to-human transmission of new coronavirus youtu.be/ZrpMfBQXlP0 (Dated to 21st January 2020) So Western countries had ample warning to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them.
    1
  21010.  @violatedmonkey  But who elects politicians for their sense of humour?
    1
  21011.  @violatedmonkey  Where did you get the information that Obama thought the comparison between him and King Kong is funny?
    1
  21012.  @violatedmonkey  Again, how have the CPC's actions led to a global pandemic? The American CDC tested American blood samples dating back to 13th December 2019 and detected the presence of Covid-19 antibodies. This implies that Covid-19 was in America even earlier than 13th Dec 2019, since it takes weeks for Covid-19 antibodies to appear. But why didn't the United States sound off the alarm about a mysterious pneumonia like illness? The United States is home to the world's best medical expertise, the best doctors and most advanced medical facilities, yet it was up to China (with our inferior medical system) to inform the WHO of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019?
    1
  21013.  @violatedmonkey  So did Americans elect Trump for his sense of humour? Like when he proposed injecting disinfectants directly into the body as a way to combat the coronavirus? And then claimed he was being sarcastic?
    1
  21014. Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  21015.  @0IIIIII  BBC is funded principally by an annual television licence fee set by the British Government, agreed by Parliament, and is used to fund the BBC's radio, TV, and online services. So if you think Xinhua is unreliable then what about BBC? I've even shown BBC deliberately doctoring photos to make green trees in China appear grey, this already destroys BBC's journalistic credibility in their portrayal of China.
    1
  21016.  @GhostMan407  You said: "it's obvious that they threatened her somehow" Do you have evidence she's being threatened? If not, then why do you seemingly jump to conclusions without proof?
    1
  21017.  @d9918  Look up for the article: How much of Australia's land is owned by China? by Yahoo! Finance
    1
  21018. ​ @d9918  Look up for the article: How much of Australia's land is owned by China? by Yahoo! Finance
    1
  21019. There are people who can see through the Western anti-China propaganda, but they still fall for Western anti-Russia propaganda. Others can see through Western anti-Russia propaganda, but still still fall for Western anti-China propaganda. Then we have rare individuals like Brian who can see through BOTH the anti-China and anti-Russia propaganda.
    1
  21020. So why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all their advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the Communists' right to rule China.
    1
  21021. @Andres Leon How exactly did I messed up? Yes I claimed Chinese have been building "towns" next to major cities, but I never claimed that they were "Chinatowns". If you read my comment carefully, I claimed the ethnic enclaves were called "Chinatowns" that's all.
    1
  21022. @Andres Leon I talked about Chinese building "towns" near major cities and then in a separate paragraph, I said "These ethnic enclaves are more commonly known as Chinatowns" so it doesn't necessarily mean that these two paragraphs are related. Therefore you have no actual proof of me messing up like you claim.
    1
  21023. @Andres Leon But I clearly never said that those "towns" near major cities were "Chinatowns" and Chinatowns were only mentioned in a separate paragraph altogether. Therefore you have no concrete proof of your claim that I messed up. Those "towns" could always be any town located near major cities.
    1
  21024.  @paul-hh9oc  In Chinese mythic origins, we believe we are "descendants" of dragons 龍的傳人 and that's one reason why we worship Chinese dragon. A snake is referred to by a different shé 蛇 which is different creature altogether from lóng 龍. Chinese dragon is a symbol of the emperor, said to have supernatural ability to control the weather, grant good harvests and is often a sign of good fortune, luck and prosperity. The Western/Christian Dragon is completely different creature and often associated with negative connotation. It is a mythic, evil beast, to be slain by heroic knights to rescue beautiful princesses in many Western folktales. In Christianity, the dragon actually the embodiment of the Seven Deadly Sins in Christianity which are: 1. Greed: Dragons hoard gold, gems and other precious items for themselves in their lairs. 2. Lust: Dragons enjoy beautiful female maidens which are often sacrificed to them. 3. Gluttony: Dragons terrorize farmers and devour livestock as well as the human sacrifices such as beautiful maidens. 4. Sloth: Dragons often portrayed sleeping on their pile of wealth. 5. Wrath: Dragons breath fire and cause widespread destruction with it. ... I forgot what the last 2 sins are, but I'm sure you can associate the dragon with those attributes.
    1
  21025.  Jacky Phantom  I was talking about "political" systems not "educational" systems between Singapore and China, so how have I given out misleading information to others?
    1
  21026.  oneviwatara  You mean just because this "Sino" people are related to Tibetan through DNA, it means we also share the same language family? You claim the front page is propaganda, then you start quoting some "statistics" from some other sours ( "See Table 44 and Additional File 5" ) What are you talking about?
    1
  21027.  @solid1378  There is no actual, physical written historical evidence of Sanskrit being that old. The date of composition of the oldest Vedic Sanskrit hymns of the Rigveda is vague at best, generally estimated to roughly 1500 BCE. Whereas we have actual physical proof of Chinese Characters carved on oracle bones from the late Shang dynasty (c. 1250–1050 BC).
    1
  21028.  @solid1378  Even before the Chinese Oracle Bone script in 1200 BCE, there exists characters such as those at Jiahu 賈湖 Neolithic culture site in Henan dating to 6600 BC. And besides, today Chinese characters are in widespread use all over the world, even the Japanese make use of Chinese characters (Kanji) and if you go to any Chinatown in the world, you are bound to notice Chinese characters on signboards and in restaurant menus. Did I mention earlier that Mandarin Chinese is also the most spoken language in the world (by number of speakers)? Whereas Sanskrit today appears to be a "dying" language and fewer people are willing to learn the language.
    1
  21029.  @solid1378  Do you have actual proof of your claims or are you just claiming that these are "verified facts by language scholars everywhere" ? And it still doesn't change the fact that Sanskrit is dying language today, whereas Chinese characters are well-known all over the globe.
    1
  21030.  oneviwatara   said "many Korean people don't look Korean at all, I mean Lao people look more Korean than so-called Koreans" What are you talking about about here? Laotians look more Korean than Koreans? Perhaps are you talking about the dominance of plastic surgery in Korea slowly changing the appearance of Koreans? Or something along those lines? Japanese having 31% or 46% Lao DNA, still means that they are more than 50% non-Lao. And Japanese, Korean and Chinese languages have long, substantiated histories, so when Japanese, Korean and Chinese names are added to Lao vocabulary, they simply pick out words that sound like those names that's all. But it doesn't mean that Japanese, Korean and Chinese cultures came from Laos.
    1
  21031.  @xfirefox_x  China today is hardly communist, and many have remarked that China is perhaps more capitalist than even some Western countries. And don't get me wrong, I am not criticizing Singapore's censorship, I actually think its good because both China and Singapore have reaped benefits from having single-party authoritarian dictatorship (under CCP and PAP respectively) For example, having long-term single-party system allows the country to make long-term plans for the country's future. Through careful planning and far-sight, Singapore has been transformed from a small fishing village nation into a 1st world nation that punch high above its weight in South East Asia. And China was once dirt-poor, starving country in the past, but today China is world's 2nd largest economy, the manufacturing hub of the world, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd largest military funding. Video: China - Hell March - The Largest Army in the World youtube.com/watch?v=5Xuqa1xKxOs And its has been achieved by authoritarian dictatorship.
    1
  21032.  oneviwatara  Names and surnames don't necessarily mean that our cultures are descended from Laos. I mean, why you never talk about Chinese characters and how they look different from Laotian language? Why are you using English words instead of the Laotian language in your posts?
    1
  21033.  @reltpid  I believe I have never said anything about Chinatowns being built as the result of racism so who is mixing things up here?
    1
  21034.  oneviwatara  Cangjie is mythical inventor of Chinese characters, (legend has it that he had four eyes, when he made Chinese characters) but in reality Chinese characters came about from various tribes written scripts being combined (and other eliminated) to form the Oracle Bone Script used in Shang Dynasty (1600 BC). And why are you only using English to supposedly link our names and surnames? Why don't you use Laotian language at all and compare it to Chinese names? I have already shown that majority of overseas Chinese are Han people previously, Chinese cuisine is Chinese in origin and has influenced American, Japanese and Korean food. Why do you still claim that Chinese culture is influenced by Laos?
    1
  21035.  oneviwatara  Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing (like the beautiful clothing the Chinese girl at 1:47 of the video wore) while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Chinese Silk was much prized by rest of the world and even a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material, along which Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder and porcelain (precious china) were traded with the rest of the world. But why you seem to think Chinese culture came from Laos? And why are you constantly using English names and surnames to create "false link" between Chinese culture and Laotian culture? Why aren't you even using Laotian written script in the first place?
    1
  21036.  @reltpid  Then why did you only highlight me in your original post? You clearly addressed me in your post with @神州 Shenzhou, yet you are now claiming to address many people including Andrea?
    1
  21037.  @reltpid  From what I understand you'll still have to option to remove the @ from your post, yet you choose to specifically address me in your post?
    1
  21038.  Jacky Phantom  I've mentioned it previously and according to the following source, majority of overseas Chinese are Han Chinese. Source: Overseas Chinese wikipedia.org/wiki/Overseas_Chinese Of course not all are, and you'll have some cases where overseas Chinese mixed with the locals like that girl you mentioned. But why do you think that girl represents all overseas Chinese?
    1
  21039.  oneviwatara  Why do you keep using English language for comparison, instead of the actual Lao language?
    1
  21040.  oneviwatara  Besides gunpowder, ancient Chinese also invented the handcannon, handguns, handgrenades, fragmentation bombs, landmines, naval mine, exploding cannonballs, rocket launchers, mutli-launch rocket systems, and of course, fireworks. There was even an ancient Chinese flamethrower, capable of launching continuous stream of flame at a target, just like the ones used in First World War. Video: Ancient Chinese Flamethrower youtube.com/watch?v=chwp82k0hLA&t=916
    1
  21041.  tk421missing  said "China is full of unwanted cities. People don't seem interested in moving to China." China has "ghost cities" yes, but there are still have a lot of people in the rural countryside and every year, millions of rural immigrants migrate to the cities to find jobs. Slowly, Chinese "ghost cities" are starting to fill up. For example, in 2011, London’s Daily Mail reported that the Zhengzhou New Area 郑州市 was China’s largest “Ghost City.” But today, Zhengzhou has a population of 10,120,000 inhabitants, and had a GDP of 1,014 billion(RMB) in 2018. If you don't believe me, take a look at this artistic and beautiful video of Zhengzhou (Watch in HD for best experience) Video: 《Hello, ZHENGZHOU 》 by YaoKing 延时航拍作品 youtube.com/watch?v=jFdLkgDS-QE&t=8 It just means China needs time to fill up our "ghost cities" that's all.
    1
  21042.  tk421missing  Here are 5 Chinese "Ghost Cities" that suddenly came alive, as more and more people started living in those cities. Source: 5 Chinese Ghost Cities that Came Alive vagabondjourney.com/5-chinese-ghost-cities-came-alive/
    1
  21043. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  21044. Nauru has recently cut diplomatic ties with Taiwan and switched its recognition of China over to mainland.
    1
  21045. Just how far back does one have to travel to reach the old days, when Americans overall could be perceived as the "good guys"? The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882? Or perhaps when Britain colonized the Americas, causing genocide of Native Americans and occupying their lands even till today.
    1
  21046. Those old days like in 1882 when the Chinese Exclusion Act was prohibiting all immigration of Chinese laborers? Or back when the British first colonized the Americas and caused genocide of Native Americans?
    1
  21047. Were the Americans the good guys back when they stole nearly an entire continent from Native Americans?
    1
  21048. America was built upon the backs of African slavery, causing genocide of Native Americans and occupation of their lands even till today, were they ever really the good guys?
    1
  21049. America was built upon the backs of African slavery and occupation of Native American lands even till today, were they ever really the good guys?
    1
  21050. Check out mainland live fire miltary drill in comparison to Taiwan's Video: Live-fire drills! Watch Chinese military exercises youtube.com/watch?v=UVMDi2TzZUc
    1
  21051.  @Youdontshushh  The OP is comparing Taiwan military drill to PUGB graphics, why can't I compare Taiwan military drill to the mainland's? The People's Liberation Army has tanks, missiles, helicopters, drones, artillery and so on. Video: China Big Military Exercise 2018 (Missile Launch) youtu.be/ht3jNf66nbo
    1
  21052.  @michaelkatz275  My bad. Should be WWIII not WWII. And polls indicate around 46 percent of Americans voted in favor of a No-Fly Zone over Ukraine, potentially risking WWIII.
    1
  21053.  @michaelkatz275  My bad. Should be WWIII not WWII.
    1
  21054. Agreed. Even much of Xi Jinping Thought comes from a focus on Marxism–Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought that had guided the Chinese people out of the darkness of that long night and established a New China. China needs to bid farewell to the U.S's way and return to our Chinese way or Mao's way.
    1
  21055. The only thing Hong Kong Police fear is that without them, Hong Kong would descent into chaos, as violent Hong Kong rioters (mostly youths) start destroying the city that their parents and grandparents worked so hard to build.
    1
  21056.  @Jeff-ej4wp  Meng Wanzhou had pleaded not guilty to the charges in the hearing and was eventually released and put on the first flight back to China.
    1
  21057.  @giteshmalhotra7645  India has 5x more people living in modern slavery than any other country in the world at a whopping 18 million modern slaves. Source: India has 18 million modern slaves—at least five times more than any other country in the world qz.com/india/695565/india-has-18-million-modern-slaves-at-least-five-times-more-than-any-other-country-in-the-world/
    1
  21058.  @giteshmalhotra7645  I gave you a link showing that India has the most number of people living in modern slavery. Here's another source: India Has the Most People Living in Modern Slavery. More than 18 million people, or 1.4% of India's population, live in slavery. Source: blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2016/06/02/india-has-the-most-people-living-in-modern-slavery/
    1
  21059. Chinese government has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's direction and future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc, and to set specific goals for China to achieve. Some of these goals include (but are not limited to): -By 2020, China plans to eliminate poverty completely and establish moderately prosperous society. -By 2025, China plans to transform our manufacturing industry to incorporate high-end technology. -By 2030, China plans to be world leader in Artificial Intelligence -By 2035, China plans to be key innovative, scientific power and establish moderately socialist society. -By 2040, China plans to ban all fossil fuel powerplants and all non-electric vehicles for greener future. -By 2045, China plans to be world leading space nation, having established a space elevator. -By 2050, China plans to have surpassed the USA as global superpower, economically and militarily. Xi outlines his vision to achieve ‘China Dream’ by 2050 http://www.atimes.com/article/xi-outlines-vision-achieve-china-dream-2050/
    1
  21060.  @narmortein537  China believes in finding win-win solutions, while the United States believes in a zero sum game.
    1
  21061.  @emilianopimentel4076  "神州 Shenzhou that's because you keep stealing our ideas and keep spying on us," The U.S stole intellectual property from the U.K. During the 19th century, America was a hotbed of literary piracy and American factories turned out adulterated foods and willfully mislabeled products. Charles Dickens visited the U.S in 1842 and when he first stepped off the boat in Boston, he found the city's bookstores rife with pirated copies of his novels, along with those of his countrymen, and was appalled. American manufacturers, distributors, and vendors of food began tampering with their products en masse -- bulking out supplies with cheap filler, using dangerous additives to mask spoilage or to give foodstuffs a more appealing color. Candy was found to contain arsenic and dyed with copper chloride; conniving brewers mixed extracts of "nux vomica," a tree that yields strychnine, to simulate the bitter taste of hops. Pickles contained copper sulphate, and custard powders yielded traces of lead. Sugar was blended with plaster of Paris, as was flour. Milk had been watered down, then bulked up with chalk and sheep's brains. Food, of course, was only the beginning. In the literary realm, for most of the 19th century the United States remained an outlaw in the world of international copyright. The nation's publishers merrily pirated books without permission, and without paying the authors or original publishers a dime. In one industry after another, 19th-century American producers churned out counterfeit products in remarkable quantities, slapping fake labels on locally made knockoffs of foreign ales, wines, gloves, and thread. ... Source: The Boston Globe: A nation of outlaws
    1
  21062.  @emilianopimentel4076  The U.S stole intellectual property from the U.K. During the 19th century, America was a hotbed of literary piracy and American factories turned out adulterated foods and willfully mislabeled products. Charles Dickens visited the U.S in 1842 and when he first stepped off the boat in Boston, he found the city's bookstores rife with pirated copies of his novels, along with those of his countrymen, and was appalled. American manufacturers, distributors, and vendors of food began tampering with their products en masse -- bulking out supplies with cheap filler, using dangerous additives to mask spoilage or to give foodstuffs a more appealing color. Candy was found to contain arsenic and dyed with copper chloride; conniving brewers mixed extracts of "nux vomica," a tree that yields strychnine, to simulate the bitter taste of hops. Pickles contained copper sulphate, and custard powders yielded traces of lead. Sugar was blended with plaster of Paris, as was flour. Milk had been watered down, then bulked up with chalk and sheep's brains. Food, of course, was only the beginning. In the literary realm, for most of the 19th century the United States remained an outlaw in the world of international copyright. The nation's publishers merrily pirated books without permission, and without paying the authors or original publishers a dime. In one industry after another, 19th-century American producers churned out counterfeit products in remarkable quantities, slapping fake labels on locally made knockoffs of foreign ales, wines, gloves, and thread. ... Source: The Boston Globe: A nation of outlaws
    1
  21063.  @emilianopimentel4076  So you conveniently overlook the U.S when it comes to their stealing of U.K IP? And according to the World Intellectual Property Indicators, China in 2020 applied for more patents than any other in the world. Countries by Patent Applications in 2020 1. China (1,441,086) 2. United States (496,123) 3. Japan (423,264) 4. South Korea (260,614) 5. Germany (168,092) 6. France (64,287) 7. United Kingdom (53,079) 8. Switzerland (44,806) 9. India (37,895) 10. Netherlands (32,812) ... Source: Wikipedia: World Intellectual Property Indicators
    1
  21064. ​ @emilianopimentel4076  So you overlook the U.S when it comes to IP theft? Also, China in 2020 applied for more patents than any other in the world. Countries by Patent Applications in 2020 1. China (1,441,086) 2. United States (496,123) 3. Japan (423,264) 4. South Korea (260,614) 5. Germany (168,092) 6. France (64,287) 7. United Kingdom (53,079) 8. Switzerland (44,806) 9. India (37,895) 10. Netherlands (32,812) ... Source: Wikipedia: World Intellectual Property Indicators
    1
  21065.  @emilianopimentel4076  In 2020, China in applied for more patents than any other in the world. Countries by Patent Applications in 2020 1. China (1,441,086) 2. United States (496,123) 3. Japan (423,264) 4. South Korea (260,614) 5. Germany (168,092) 6. France (64,287) 7. United Kingdom (53,079) 8. Switzerland (44,806) 9. India (37,895) 10. Netherlands (32,812) ... Source: Wikipedia: World Intellectual Property Indicators
    1
  21066.  @robertoosido1232  "Because Taiwan wants to be free from China" Surveys have shown that only a minority of people in Taiwan want independence. The majority wants the status quo to continue.
    1
  21067.  @robertoosido1232  "Because Taiwan wants to be free from China" Surveys have shown that only a minority of people in Taiwan want independence. The majority wants the status quo to continue.
    1
  21068.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Philippines own Spraty islands and so on," The Spratly Islands was not part of the Philippines as per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America. The Treaty of Paris drew up Philippines' boundaries which excluded the Spratly Islands from its territorial borders. When the Republic of China published the Eleven Dash Line in 1947, claiming Spratly islands, the Philippines did not object to it. Then how does the Philippines own the Spratly Islands.
    1
  21069.  @robertoosido1232  You said: "Relatively peaceful? China has always made a lot of noise with news of trouble in neighboring countries" U.S Navy warships have been sailing to within 12 Nautical Miles of Chinese territorial waters in the Paracel Islands. For example: 2022: USS Benfold sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2021: USS John S McCain sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2020: USS Mustin sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2019: USS Wayne E Meyer sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2018: USS Higgins and USS Antietam sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2017: USS Chafee sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2016: USS Curtis Wilbur sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. ...
    1
  21070.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "(Cyrus' channel) appears to predominantly focus on criticizing the US while neglecting to acknowledge any shortcomings on China's part." As far as I know, Cyrus Janssen is a U.S citizen, NOT a Chinese citizen. So there's literally nothing he can do about China, but as a U.S citizen, there's something he can do about improving his country.
    1
  21071.  @incognitoone  Tibet became part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Tibet as well as Song Dynasty China, and then incorporated both territories into Yuan Dynasty China. Centuries later, the Manchu conquerors did the same thing with Tibet during Qing Dynasty China. Although Tibet broke free of China in 1912, it was eventually reincorporated back into the mainland by 1952, so how is that an occupation of Tibet? Today, every country in the world recognizes the Tibet Autonomous Region as part of China.
    1
  21072.  @jross3680  a. Vietnam began construction of its airstrip on Spratly Island in 1976, making this the first runway in the Spratly island group. In 1978, the Philippines incorporated Thitu Island after airstrip construction had already begun. In 1983, Malaysia built an airstrip atop Swallow Reef. The Nationalist Chinese government (i.e Taiwan) constructed its airstrip on Itu Aba in 2006 and construction finished in 2008. Mainland China is actually a late-comer to building airstrips in the Spratly Island. China's first airstrip construction in Spratlys only began in late 2014 on Fiery Cross Reef. Whereas Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia and RoC all have long existing airstrips in the Spratly Islands. Yet you're only singling out China? b. The Paracel Islands lie within 200 NM of China's geographic baseline so they are considered part of China's EEZ (Exclusive Economic Zone) then what's wrong with China building bases within our own EEZ? c. Scarborough Shoal was not part of Philippine territory as per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America. When the Republic of China claimed it under the 1947 Eleven Dash Line, the Philippines did not object to China's claim.
    1
  21073.  @incognitoone  The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议), thus affirming mainland sovereignty over Tibet. Even today, if you look up any Map of the People's Republic of China, the Tibet Autonomous Region is included part of China.
    1
  21074.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "In 2016, the Arbitral Tribunal in the South China Sea Arbitration promulgated a historic ruling," What's the name of this arbitral tribunal? China made a clear declaration in accordance with the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea in 2006 to exclude compulsory arbitration on sovereign disputes and maritime delimitation. Therefore China does not have to adhere to the tribunal's ruling.
    1
  21075.  @incognitoone  "神州 Shenzhou Who are you kidding?" No one. Go look up the shape of the map of China, and Tibet Autonomous Region is recognized all over the world as being part of the People's Republic of China.
    1
  21076.  @bartonlee3594  The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is not an official UN agency, it only shares the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Since the South China Sea arbitration was conducted by a non-official UN agency like the PCA (instead of the ICJ) then China reserves the right not to accept its ruling over issues such as sovereignty.
    1
  21077.  @okletssee8071  Singapore has been under the authoritarian single-party rule of the PAP for 57 years, much like how China has been under the CPC for 73 years. You claimed China is not a democratic country, but isn't Singapore's political system very much like China's in this regard?
    1
  21078.  @ParallelComparison  You said: "And yet daddy USA saved China from tiny island Japan" USA did not save China. Imperial Japan had invaded Manchuria in 1931, and the U.S were content to let Japan continue occupying more Chinese territory. Only after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor did the U.S choose to join China in the fight against Japan. In total, China had fought Japan for 14 years (1931-1949) with 11 years (1931-1942) alone while the U.S fought Japan for 3 years (1942-1945) with Chinese aid.
    1
  21079.  @ParallelComparison  You said: "The US is China's savior, when the US entered the war, the US subdued the imperial Japan." Actually, the last campaign fought of WWII was the 1945 Soviet invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria, that finally caused Japan to surrender. So if anything, we should be thanking the Soviet communists for putting an end to WWII and causing the Japanese to surrender.
    1
  21080.  @ParallelComparison  You said: "The main point of my argument is that dogs are skinned alive on the streets" If an animal species is regarded as food, then who are you to judge how food is prepared? Even in the West, lobsters are boiled alive, and nobody cares about this because lobsters are considered food.
    1
  21081. Many Chinese are optimistic and look forward to a bright future. Whereas many westerners are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy view of the future.
    1
  21082. Many Filipino tend to have the "colonial mentality" of worshipping Anglo Saxon culture while harboring disdain for any "non-white" culture, including their own. Only by decolonizing their minds can the people truly be free.
    1
  21083.  @MarkYeung1  Wasn't there already a Chinese actor in Marvel's Doctor Strange? The actor that played Wong? Video: All Wong Scenes from the Marvel Cinematic Universe youtu.be/7wYl3kTm8rg Furthermore, why is there a need for Chinese people to celebrate having Chinese actors in Marvel? So many Chinese actors came before Simu Liu in Hollywood, such as Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Chow Yun Fatt, Donnie Yen, Tony Leung, and so on. Yet Simu Liu acted like there was no one representing Asians in Hollywood while growing up? It's disrespectful of him to dismiss his predecessors and pioneers of Hollywood.
    1
  21084.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou the word "Colonial" means Chinese people are being told what to do and what not to do." The word 'Colonial' means when one nation subjugates another, conquering its population and exploiting it, often while forcing its own language and cultural values upon its people. That was what happened in Hong Kong when the British colonized Hong Kong, but mainland China isn't colonial towards our own people, that's just twisting the meaning of 'colonial' that's all.
    1
  21085.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou I agree with you. Western Colonialism is gone. Chinese can live anywhere in Hong Kong. But Colonialism of the mind still persist. Like what happens in China." After the 1949, China has since expelled the foreign imperialists that seek to impose their way of thinking onto China, so how does colonialism of the mind still persist in mainland China? Whereas in Hong Kong, although the British have since physically decolonized, there are some people in Hong Kong who still suffer from "colonial mindset" such as during the 2019 protests, there were people waving United States 🇺🇸 Flag and United Kingdom 🇬🇧 Flag among the throngs of protestors. You know how to tell that someone suffers from "colonial mindset"? They use phrases like "They deserve the right to choose just like western people." that's how you tell someone hasn't decolonized their mind yet.
    1
  21086.  @MarkYeung1  Most Mainland Chinese don't even know Simu Liu and Awkafina, they are unfamiliar faces to mainland audiences and frankly speaking, they don't look very attractive in their first impression. But on the other hand, Shangchi's father, Tony Leung is famous among Chinese, many mainlanders find him very handsome so maybe mainland Chinese would watch the movie to support Tony Leung. Of course, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and differ people have different perceptions of beauty. Shangchi is yet to be released in China and Disney has yet to receive clearance from Beijing’s regulators to show the film in China.
    1
  21087.  @MarkYeung1  Tony Leung is awesome, a true veteran Chinese actor, having starred in many Chinese movies. Despite his fame, Tony Leung is also remarkably humble, not overly boastful like Simu Liu who is seemingly letting the fame of Marvel get to his head, and disregarding the efforts of other pioneers like Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Donnie Yen, Jet Li, Chow Yun Fatt, among many others. China reserves the right to decide whether to allow certain films into our country. Shangchi is an American superhero film, produced by Marvel Studios and distributed by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures, and China was not involved in any stage of it's production, so it's a purely American film that's aimed at China, but it doesn't necessarily mean China has to allow it to be shown in our theaters.
    1
  21088.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "I watched many interviews of Simu and disagreed with your accessment. He is a great Chinese role model and we should be proud of." I don't think Simu Liu is a good role model. Tony Leung is a great actor, yet he is humble, not boastful like Simu Liu, just after he landed a position in Marvel. I watched Simu Liu's comments on China in 2017 and he's ashamed of his homeland, which was why his family migrated to Canada. Video: Shang-Chi's Simu Liu Under Fire in China for Explaining Why His Family Emigrated to Canada youtu.be/nW1-iAOOeA0 If I'm not wrong, you're also Chinese Canadian too right? No wonder why you seemingly support Simu Liu despite his boastful attitude and that his shameful feelings towards his homeland.
    1
  21089.  @MarkYeung1  But Simu Liu's interview revealed his own feelings of shame towards his homeland, and that's why I believe he's not a good role model for Chinese. This is my opinion (even you said that's okay, we don't have to agree) so why should other Chinese follow his example? And I did say Chinese welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors, so many expats come to China and get treated well. However, many Westerners are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands with suspicion.
    1
  21090.  @MarkYeung1  Those people had the money to travel overseas and start life anew in another country, whereas those who remained helped build up China to what it is today. The problem is that some of these overseas Chinese have been brought up feeling ashamed of their homeland and they overly worship Western culture, so much such that they advocate Western culture onto China.
    1
  21091.  @MarkYeung1  I clearly said "some" of these overseas Chinese but not all, so what are you disagreeing with? And there are some examples like Gordan Chang, who's been brought up hating his Chinese side, that's why he constantly makes predictions about China's impending downfall. Because that's what Western media been telling him his whole, life to be ashamed of his motherland.
    1
  21092.  @MarkYeung1  Eileen Gu's mom is a great example, because she's 1st generation Chinese immigrant and she hasn't forgotten her Chinese roots. However, some 2nd generation and 3rd generation Chinese (but not all) have been brought up by Western anti-China propaganda, and have grown to feel ashamed of their homeland (like Gordon Chang) Eileen Gu is lucky to have such a nurturing mother and I hope Eileen Gu's gold medalist status help inspire more overseas Chinese to feel proud of their homeland. I believed I previously shared my thoughts on Simu Liu. I wrote: "I don't think Simu Liu is a good role model. Tony Leung is a great actor, yet he is humble, not boastful like Simu Liu, just after he landed a position in Marvel. I watched Simu Liu's comments on China in 2017 and he's ashamed of his homeland, which was why his family migrated to Canada." Also, didn't you said earlier that I don't have to agree with you? Why are you bringing up Simu Liu again?
    1
  21093. @NoRockinMansLand What's the name of the local worker that died? What's the name of the 2 managers who were arrested?
    1
  21094. Good News, Gonzalo Lira is alive and well. Video:youtu.be/R2yeSOcNlgE
    1
  21095. @Winnie the Flu The Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market was investigated by the World Health Organization investigation team and it was discovered that the virus entered the market from the outside, and the market was merely a spreading center, then why should China shut down our markets?
    1
  21096.  @MarkYeung1  Vaccines alone are insufficient. Just look at Cyrus Janssen getting vaccinated, but still he and his family came down with Covid-19. What is needed is to stop transmissions as a much as possible, because there's increased possibility of the virus mutating with each transmission, and a newer, deadlier, more transmissible variant may emerge if governments just let Covid-19 spread rampantly.
    1
  21097. @Winnie the Flu If you want to "BOYCOTT EVERYTHING CHINA" then why don't you start at home yourself? Throw away everything in your house that has a "Made in China" label, including smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, etc. Get rid of them all, even products containing parts that are Made in China, since you want to boycott everything China.
    1
  21098. @Winnie the Flu Chairman Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it. And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    1
  21099. @Winnie the Flu How is China a virus factory when China has a zero Covid policy? New Covid-19 variants emerge because of transmission of Covid-19, and China is limiting transmissions as much as possible, unlike the United States which just allow the Covid-19 to spread among its populace.
    1
  21100.  @MarkYeung1  There's an article by South China Morning Post. China's supercomputer (Tianhe-1) analyzed the lungs of a young American vaper hospitalized for "mysterious pneumonia" in the summer of 2019 and suggested possible Covid-19 infection.
    1
  21101. @Winnie the Flu Take rare earth metals for example, and China controls around 90% of all rare earth metals productions. Rare earth metals are used in rechargeable batteries for electric and hybrid cars, advanced ceramics, computers, DVD players, wind turbines, catalysts in cars and oil refineries, monitors, televisions, lighting, lasers, fiber optics, superconductors and glass polishing. Several rare earth elements, such as neodymium and dysprosium, are critical to the motors used in electric vehicles. If you really want to "BOYCOTT EVERYTHING CHINA" then you should be throwing away your smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances because they contain rare earth metals that come from China, so why are you still responding on your device instead of truly boycotting everything China?
    1
  21102. @Winnie the Flu Again, Chairman Mao Zedong did not even murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine caused by bad weather conditions, then why are you classifying people starving to death as a mass murder?
    1
  21103. @Winnie the Flu Huawei actually overtook Apple in smartphone sales, so the United States decide to get Canada to detain Meng Wanzhou in order to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride. But after nearly 3 years, Meng pleaded not guilty and Canada eventually released Meng and put her on the first flight back to China.
    1
  21104. @Winnie the Flu The Virus Factory is the one allowing uncontrolled transmissions of Covid-19, increasing the possibility of newer, deadlier, more virulent strains emerging. China is doing everything to curb the spread of Covid-19 and reducing transmissions as much as possible, so isn't this the opposite behavior of a virus factory?
    1
  21105.  @danpress7745  Only when talents migrate from a developed country to a developing country (i.e the West to China) that such a phenomena is called "reverse brain drain" and China has been experiencing reverse brain drain over the past decades as many overseas educated Chinese make their way back to the homeland. As for accepting political dissidents and economic refugees, China is still classified as a developing nation, why would refugees and asylum seekers come to China?
    1
  21106.  @danpress7745  Only when talents migrate from a developed country to a developing country (i.e the West to China) that such a phenomena is called "reverse brain drain" and China has been experiencing reverse brain drain over the past decades as many overseas educated Chinese make their way back to the homeland.
    1
  21107.  @danpress7745  Article: China's Reverse Brain Drain published by International Studies of Management and Organization Abstract: This review examines why mainland Chinese students who study abroad repatriate to China, how they fare on reentry to China, and whether they reexpatriate. We show that Chinese students are motivated not only by career and economic considerations when deciding to repatriate, but also by social and psychological concerns.
    1
  21108.  @danpress7745  The Straits Times: China's reverse brain drain: Nation columnist Abstract: In his article, the writer says the rise of China's technology hubs provides new opportunities and is encouraging overseas Chinese to return home.
    1
  21109.  @danpress7745  Are you talking about the actual religious deity Xuan Tian Shang Di (玄天上帝)? Or is it someone else?
    1
  21110.  Beast Mode  Remember back when U.S General Mark Milley made a phonecall to his Chinese counterpart, General Zhang, telling him that the U.S will not nuke China?
    1
  21111.  Beast Mode  Remember back when U.S General Mark Milley made a phonecall to his Chinese counterpart, General Zhang, telling him that the U.S will not launch a nuclear strike?
    1
  21112.  @danpress7745  Pascal Coppen's another great channel for people wishing to know and understand China and the Chinese way of thinking better.
    1
  21113.  @danpress7745  I'm not really a religious person, so I'm not the sort of person to worship weather deities.
    1
  21114.  @danpress7745  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  21115.  @danpress7745  2. If we look at ancient writting scripts, Chinese characters constitute the oldest continuously used system of writing in the world, having been used since 1200 BCE and today, Mandarin Chinese is the most spoken language in the world by number of speakers. Whereas other ancient scripts like Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia) Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered dead languages today, since they are no longer evolving with the times and no new words being added into their vocabulary.
    1
  21116.  @danpress7745  You said: "I think the problem is that many countries feel threatened, especially military, by China." China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it seems like the U.S is a threat to global peace and stability.
    1
  21117.  @danpress7745  My username has no direct connection to the city of Shenzhen (深圳). My username 神州 Shenzhou means "The Divine Realms" and is one of the ancient literary names used to refer to China. It also has the same sound as the name of China's manned spacecraft missions, the Shenzhou (神舟) meaning "Divine Vessel" used to launch Chinese taikonauts (Chinese astronauts) into space. My username is meant to show how China is a both an ancient, 5000-year old civilization as well as a modern space-faring nation.
    1
  21118.  @danpress7745  Many of the world's earliest writing systems were logograms which a written character that represents a word, like Mesopotamian Cuneiform, Egyptian Hieroglyphs and Chinese characters, of which only Chinese characters survived to modern time. With the passage of time, there are bound to changes and evolution to scripts and Chinese characters remainly widely used today with Mandarin Chinese being the most spoken language in the world by number of speakers. Had say, Egyptian Hieroglyphs survived, it's possible that the language would start to resemble modern Chinese characters in terms of simplification of strokes.
    1
  21119.  @danpress7745  You said: "And, herein is the difference: I can say negative things about the US government without fear I and many others did protest the Iraq war. You nor any other Chinese person can not do the same." Who says that Chinese cannot say negative things about the U.S government without fear? I've said plenty of negative things about the U.S government all this time, what are you talking about? Also in 2003, Chinese students in Peking University took part in protests against the war in Iraq, permitted by Chinese authorities.
    1
  21120.  @danpress7745  The U.S entered Vietnam War claiming that 3 communist PT boats attacked an American destroyer (USS Maddox) called the Gulf of Tonkin incident, in which later investigations showed that it didn't happened. During the Vietnam War, the Americans dropped napalm bombs and torched Vietnamese villages to the ground. Just look up the story of "Napalm Girl" and how her clothes were burnt off by napalm. The Americans also sprayed chemical defoliants like Agent Orange, causing birth defects in Vietnamese children even 40 years after the war. In the end, the Americans abandoned the South Vietnamese at Saigon, so how is the U.S justified in not being an invader?
    1
  21121.  @danpress7745  About the Vietnam War, the U.S claimed that 3 communist PT boats attacked an American destroyer, known as the Gulf of Tonkin incident, but later investigations revealed that it didn't happened. During the Vietnam War, the Americans dropped napalm bombs and torched Vietnamese villages to the ground. Just look up the story of "Napalm Girl" and how her clothes were burnt off by napalm. The Americans also sprayed chemical defoliants like Agent Orange, causing birth defects in Vietnamese children even 40 years after the war. In the end, the Americans abandoned the South Vietnamese to their fate at Saigon, so how is the U.S justified in not being an invader?
    1
  21122. ​ @danpress7745  You said: "No, No, No You either misread my post or I was not clear; " How did I misread your post? This is what you wrote: "And, herein is the difference: I can say negative things about the US government without fear I and many others did protest the Iraq war. You nor any other Chinese person can not do the same." But I as a Chinese person can say negative things about the U.S government, in fact I do it practically all the time. And I've pointed out that in 2003, Chinese students in Peking University protested the Iraq War. And what makes you think Chinese cannot protest? On average, China sees at around 500 protests daily over a wide variety of grievances, including corruption, forced evictions, unpaid wages, human rights abuses, environmental degradation, ethnic protests, petitioning for religious freedom and civil liberties, protests against one-party rule, as well as nationalist protests against foreign countries. In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010 (or an average of 493 protests daily in 2010). Source: Wikipedia: Protest and dissent in China You said: "We in the democracies combat corruption through protests and voting. No Chinese person can o the same." You keep on making sweeping claims about Chinese person "not being able to do this or that", but see my above source and there are Chinese protesting about corruption in China. For example, the Wukan protests (乌坎事件), also known as the Siege of Wukan, was an anti-corruption protest that began in September 2011, and escalated in December 2011 with the expulsion of officials by villagers. Corruption is a universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-corruption crackdowns to deal with the mountain of corruption in the Communist Party. More than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption, including over 120 high-ranking officials, including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders. But when is the last time a country like the United States had an anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hilary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump had promised to jail her during his presidential campaign. But after he became president, no further action has been taken against Clinton for corruption. So what good does having the ability to protest against corruption do for you?
    1
  21123.  @danpress7745  1. "Napalm Girl" literally had her village burnt by American napalm on her village, even burning off the clothes off her back, and you seem to suggest that America has somehow "redeemed" itself by being offered immigration to the U.S, when it was the U.S intervention in Vietnam War that caused all of that? 2. The Flying Tigers didn't fought for China during World War 2. When Imperial Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931 (8 years before the start of WW2 with the Nazi invasion of Poland) the Americans were content to let Japan occupy more and more Chinese territory for more than a decade. The Americans only joined China against the Japanese, because Pearl Harbor was bombed in 1941 and after which the Tigers launched their attack against Japan. So the Flying Tigers were doing it in response to the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor, not for China's sake. 3. Turns out that the U.S warship when confronted, was already 3 to 4 nautical miles (6 to 7 km) inside the 12 NM (22 km; 14 mi) limit claimed by North Vietnam. Also the U.S warship fired off 3 rounds against the North Vietnamese PT boats. The U.S warship was undamaged except for a single Vietnamese machine gun bullet hole. And it's been proven that the 2nd alleged attack of the Gulf of Tonkin incident did not take place, but it was the excuse the Americans use to send more forces to Vietnam. I've previously mentioned napalm and chemical defoliants like Agent Orange, but the Americans also planted numerous landmines throughout Vietnam and did not clear them when they abandoned the South Vietnamese at Saigon. Even till today, those unexploded mines pose a hazard to the people in Vietnam.
    1
  21124.  @danpress7745  Earlier you wrote: "My original point was that many in Asia fear China, both for historical reasons and present day reasons. China has a long history of invasions of its neghbors. Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Cambodia, India, and the Philippines have had Chinese soldiers occupy their homes." Which Korean homes have been occupied by Chinese soldiers? Which Japanese homes have been occupied by Chinese soldiers? Which Cambodian homes have been occupied by Chinese soldiers? Which Indian homes have been occupied by Chinese soldiers? And which Philippine homes have been occupied by Chinese soldiers? I just find it incredulous that you can just hurl such accusations against China without substantiating your claims, similar to how you claimed "Chinese persons cannot do this or that" without bothering to do research.
    1
  21125.  @danpress7745  "So, when China moves into the South China Sea, threatens Taiwan and India, and pushes into Japanese islands these countries, remembering history, see a threat." China first claimed the South China Sea islands back when the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) published their 11-Dash Line in 1947. The ROC has since fled to Taiwan, and Taiwan administration still maintains this claim over the South China Sea. The People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 modified the claim and removed two dashes, to arrive at the 9-Dash Line map we know today. There's also the fact that North Vietnamese PM Pham Van Dong had formally acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese, and he wrote a diplomatic letter to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. Here's the link to the diplomatic letter: Source: Wikipedia: 1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai Lastly, the Diaoyu Islands were historically Chinese, until the Imperial Japanese occupied it during the war. But after Japan's WW2 surrender, Japan agreed to relinquish all previously occupied territory, yet the Diaoyu Islands wasn't returned back to its original owner.
    1
  21126. ​ @danpress7745  1. Again, the fact that Napalm Girl had her village torched by American napalm already speaks volumes of the atrocities Americans committed in Vietnam (let alone Agent Orange and the planting of landmines). Had America not involved itself in Vietnam, then Phan Thị Kim Phuc would have most likely remained and grown up in her homeland of Vietnam, instead of being a refugee. As for choosing China, China at that time was still a rather poor country, of course she won't choose it. And it was Western democracies that were responsible for Vietnam War, so it's only right that they welcome refugees from the countries their troops were fighting in. 2. Her name was coined for her because the South Vietnamese dropped American napalm on her village. They were the ones who gave her the name. Had there been no napalm bombing, she would be more commonly known by her real name instead of the one chosen for her. 3. She herself admits that the South Vietnamese were bombing the Viet Cong, yet you try to twist her words claiming the North invaded the South? When did North Vietnam invaded South Vietnam you tell me? 4. So what if there are refugees moving to democracy? There are also Ukrainian refugees moving to Russia, so what's your point? There are even Ukrainian cities like Kharkiv, Kherson, etc, that are raising the Soviet-era hammer and sickle flag and are issuing Russian passports and accepting Russian ruble in business transactions. And the Flying Tigers only started fighting in 1941 after Pearl Harbor was bombed, so it was evident that U.S fought Japan in retaliation for Pearl Harbor, not for China's sake. The Flying Tigers began to arrive in China in April 1941. The group first saw combat on 20 December 1941, 12 days after Pearl Harbor (local time). ... Source: Wikipedia: Flying Tigers
    1
  21127.  @danpress7745  1. The overwhelming majority of historical societies were authoritarian in nature and like it not, there were long periods of great stability, with many of them lasting over century. Here are some examples of ancient authoritarian empires and how long they lasted: Abbasid Caliphate (508 years), Aceh Sultanate (407 years), Achaemenid Empire (220 years), Ahom Dynasty (610 years), Akkadian Empire (180 years), Armenian Empire (618 years), Assyria (1589 years), Ashanti Empire (226 years), Babylonian Empire (300 years), Bornu Empire (506 years), Bruneian Empire (520 years), Carthaginian Empire (668 years), Chavín Empire (700 years), Egyptian Empire (473 years), Ghana Empire (940 years), Goguryeo (705 years), Han Dynasty (426 years), Holy Roman Empire (844 years), and so many more. ... Source: Wikipedia: List of empires As for infighting, even in Western democracies there are constant infighting like we are seeing today in United States, United Kingdom, etc. And it's not just authoritarian governments that are always attacking others, even the U.S is a warmonger (as we've both agreed on).
    1
  21128.  @danpress7745  You said: "And, NO Democracy has ever gone the war with another Democracy, never." That's blatantly false, there's an entire list of List of wars between democracies on Wikipedia, between entities that have a constitutionally democratic form of government and actually practice it. Some notable examples include: Mexican–American War, Spanish–American War, Philippine–American War. 2. Corruption is a universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption a certain degree. Whereas authoritarian countries can deal with corruption, such as China's anti-corruption crackdown by President Xi. More than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption. But when is the last time a country like the United States had an anti-corruption campaign of its own? Donald Trump promised to release his tax details if he become President, yet why hasn't he done so? 3. Modern Western style democracy is a new idea so it's not guaranteed to be successful in the future. And it already it's looks as though things are beginning to crack. Western democratic institutions are failing at the seams, and many Western governments just aren't able to deliver on what the people truly want. Whereas China's political system has not only shown to be viable for our country, but it's extremely successful to boot. If anything, China is a living example of how not all countries have to adopt Western style democracy to be successful.
    1
  21129.  @danpress7745  ou said: "And, NO Democracy has ever gone the war with another Democracy, never." That's blatantly false, there's an entire list of List of wars between democracies on Wikipedia, between entities that have a constitutionally democratic form of government and actually practice it. Some notable examples include: Mexican–American War, Spanish–American War, Philippine–American War. 2. Corruption is a universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption a certain degree. Whereas authoritarian countries can deal with corruption, such as China's anti-corruption crackdown by President Xi. More than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption. But when is the last time a country like the United States had an anti-corruption campaign of its own? Donald Trump promised to release his tax details if he become President, yet why hasn't he done so?
    1
  21130.  @danpress7745  You said: "And, NO Democracy has ever gone the war with another Democracy, never." That's blatantly false, there's an entire list of List of wars between democracies on Wikipedia, between entities that have a constitutionally democratic form of government and actually practice it. Some notable examples include: Mexican–American War, Spanish–American War, Philippine–American War. I find it ironic that you accuse me of half-truths, yet you can brazenly lie about no democracy ever going to war with another democracy. Like how much research did you even bother to do?
    1
  21131.  @dauletmatakov  You're welcome to disagree with my views, but I believe provide links where possible to substanciate my facts. Could you perhaps point out which of my statements are wrong?
    1
  21132.  @benitocamelo1488  Is there a problem with me posting on this thread? Why not attempt to refute my points instead of telling me to get a life?
    1
  21133.  @benitocamelo1488  Could you explain why is it not healthy to argue with people online? Through this I get to hear opposing viewpoints as well as bring up counter arguments (with supporting links where possible) then are you to stop me from expressing my views? Why don't you attempt to refute my points instead of telling me to get a life?
    1
  21134.  @dauletmatakov  Earlier you mentioned that some "facts" are not correct, well why don't you point them out to me? Also, you've mentioned that I have a skewed world view, well could you elaborate on this?
    1
  21135.  @yslee1401  Video: In 3 minutes: How China builds a high-speed railway tunnel youtu.be/6eJG4QhgfwA
    1
  21136. NopFor OpposingForce Nobody in this thread mentioned anything about President Xi Jinping at all, and we were talking about Donald Trump and Mao Zedong.
    1
  21137. Nopfor OpposingForce Did you even read the comment I wrote to Sam Shyam? Of course Mao is dead, and I pointed out that Trump is still alive and there is a possibility that he might kill 60 million of his own people in the future that's all. When did I ever mention anything about President Xi at all, until you brought him up?
    1
  21138. +NopFor OpposingForce Mao Zedong was only human and made mistakes like one. Mao managed to unify China (which the previous KMT adminstration of China failed to achieve) under communism and proclaim People's Republic of China in 1949. And how is it considered a genocide, when it during the was Chinese Civil War, where Chinese were killing Chinese (just like in American Civil War, Americans killed Americans and America won)? Isn't that applying double standards? About term limits, the Chinese Communist Party makes long term plans and has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc, to map out China's direction and future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc. By abolish the presidential term limit, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. But in USA, your leaders are forced to stepdown after 4-8 years and therefore, US presidents can only make short term plans for America, instead of long-term plans spanning 10 or more years into the future.
    1
  21139. +NopFor OpposingForce The communist party has long acknowledged the failure of Great Leap Forward and even Mao Zedong himself made a self-criticism and stepped down from being state-chairman. He was only human after all and made mistakes like one. But the corrupted KMT accepted foreign aid from USA, and pocketed $750 million dollars of US military aid, even US President Harry Truman wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves," During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were crappy, and their numbers were few. While the KMT was wealthy (having taxed the peasants greatly) had better equipment, better training, superior numbers, and yet the KMT still lost the mainland to communist peasants, and had to flee to Formosa. So doesn't this demonstrate gross incompetence on KMT's part? "How come China's leaders aren't elected for 30 years then?" Because if the leader has shown competence in governing China for 30 years, then why force him to step down on accord of a term limit? What if the next Chinese president is inexperienced, or starts reversing the previous leader's policies? That's why why do you think ordinary Chinese people should vote for our leaders? Ordinary people are fickle, they may not vote responsibly, they may base their decisions on emotions, instead of logic, or they lack the political awareness to make important decisions regarding their country's future. Look at Trump's election for example, and Donald Trump preyed on American's resentment of China and made false promises of making America great again, and the American voters believed him and voted for him, even when Trump has zero political experience. Why then should China allow the ordinary people to vote? You are guiding a country of 300 million (1.4 billion for China) so why let the unqualified ordinary people to make such important decisions regarding your country's future?
    1
  21140. +NopFor OpposingForce said "The KMT didn't at least let millions of people starve and killed their own people after they left to Taiwan." When the KMT administered the mainland from 1912-1937, there were numerous famines such as 1920-1921 North China famine, the 1928–1930 Chinese famine, the 1936-1937 Chinese famine in Sichuan and Gansu, the 1942–1943 famine in Henan. Millions of Chinese died in the mainland during the KMT administration of China. When the KMT left to Taiwan, Jiang Jieshi imposed Martial Law onto Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time! Jiang Jieshi ruled Taiwan with an iron fist and purged his political opponents, in a period known as "White Terror" of which from about 3,000 to 4,000 were executed for their real or perceived opposition to the Kuomintang. So why you claim the KMT didn't kill their own people? Did you study Chinese history at all? Look at China having long overtaken Taiwan, and the United Nations even kicked Republic of China (Taiwan) out of the UN security council in 1970s, and choose to recognize the People's Republic of China as China. Your UN countries voted in the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1668 with 61 UN Member States voting in its favor, 34 UN Member States voted against it. As for borrowing political systems, what about Westerners borrowing Chinese systems such as the concept of a merit system? The Chinese people invented the concept of examinations and this spread from China to British India during the 17th century, and then into continental Europe. So its thanks to China that students all over the world take examinations today. About President Xi Jinping, firstly I don't claim to be able to predict the future, but from his current anti-corruption campaigns, I can tell that he is serious about dealing within corruption in the Communist party. As the head of anti-corruption practices, if he himself were to be found to be corrupted then the punishment meted out against him will be severe. But just like I can't know for sure that he will be corrupted in the future, you too, can't know for sure whether he will NOT be corrupted in the future. And that's the problem with your US system. You President Trump will be forced to step down after 4-8 years, and therefore, US presidents can only make short-term plans for America instead of long-term plans spanning 10 years or more. I mean, look at your two political parties, they constantly blame each other for America's woes, and they constantly fight each other, instead of fighting for America's interests. Look, former US president Obama had been planning the Trans Pacific Partnership deal for 8 years, yet when Trump became president, he cancelled the TPP, because he did not like Obama (Obama humiliated him with his birth cert) So how are US presidents ever going to make long term plans for America, with such a faulty system? Whereas China has made long term plans for China in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050. For example: -by 2020, China plans to eliminate poverty and become innovation hub. -by 2030, China plans to become world leader in Artificial Intelligence. -by 2040, China plans to ban all fossil fuels and non-electric vehicles. -by 2050, China plans to surpass the USA in military and this will cement China as a global power. Xi outlines his vision to achieve ‘China Dream’ by 2050 atimes.com/article/xi-outlines-vision-achieve-china-dream-2050/ By abolishing the presidential term limits in China, our leaders are expected to remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. How else to achieve longterm plans if your leaders are forced to step down because of term limits?
    1
  21141. +NopFor OpposingForce Where did you get your bloated figure of 45 million people dying because of the Great Leap Forward? According to the following source, China's population was 544,112,923 in 1955, and by 1960 it had grown to 644,450,173, having actually increased by 45,875,932! Source: Population of China 1950 populationpyramid.net/china/1950/ So you're telling me that during the Great Leap Forward, China's population of 544 million in 1955, decreased by 45 million, yet it grew by double that amount to become 644 million in 1960? Thus, isn't your 45 million death toll grossly exaggerated by Western anti-Communist agenda? How did they calculate the figures? You clearly said "The KMT didn't at least let millions of people starve and killed their own people after they left to Taiwan." yet I have shown that KMT ruled Taiwan under iron fist, imposing Martial Law for 38 years, and having executed thousands for their perceived opposition to the KMT in Taiwan. As for CCP fighting the Japanese, the CCP had smaller numbers than the KMT or the Japanese, so they resorted to tactics suitable for a smaller force to fight against a larger opponent, such as guerilla warfare. About Intellectual Property, Chinese people also invented the Four Great Inventions 四大发明 which have greatly influenced the rest of the world. Paper and Printing made the recording and transmission of knowledge much easier. The Compass made navigation easier and less hazardous and journeys become more reliable. And Gunpowder has greatly revolutionized the way modern battles are fought. But do you see Chinese people complaining about you Westerners using our inventions?
    1
  21142.  @MarkYeung1  "They economically choose China and politically choose United States." Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Malaysia did not choose the United States politically, they don't even have the same political system as the U.S. Vietnam is socialist republic under the communist party. Cambodia is constitutional monarchy with the king as the head of state. Laos is one-party parliamentary socialist republic where LPR Party reigns supreme. Thailand is a constitutional monarchy, whereby a hereditary monarch is head of state. Malaysia is a constitutional monarchy, where the king is head of state. Even Singapore has been governed by a single party, the PAP for its entire life.
    1
  21143. Do you have evidence she was told her family would end up making shoes for LeBron James?
    1
  21144.  @HH-gf6rk  Those idealistic Hong Kong high school kids have been raised in a cloistered environment of education, perfect theories and textbook ideals, that may not apply to real life politics. Why do you think these students know how to best govern Hong Kong? They haven't even stepped out into the real working world of adults and experience Hong Kong's real world politics. Imagine the reverse scenario, if tens of thousands of American high school kids who haven't even graduated from school, yet they think "communism" is the best way to run America, and some of them start rioting in the streets, resorting to violence, arsonism, vandalism, hurling petrol bombs, breaking building windows, security cameras, traffic lights, etc. Why should the American government bow down to these kids demands? Same goes for Hong Kong government and the protestors.
    1
  21145.    Who said anything about concentration camps here in this thread? All I did was talk about Hong Kong protestors being idealistic high school kids that's all.
    1
  21146.  @HH-gf6rk  Video: A third of the Hong Kong protestors arrested are teenagers youtu.be/_eIb_MtZILw
    1
  21147.  @salomez-finnegan7952  Why can't I support China's government? Look at mainland China today and we are the world's 2nd largest economy and still growing, whereas Hong Kong's economy is ranked 34th in the world and is currently in a slump today. What happened to Hong Kong's previous prosperity under British colonial rule from 1841-1997?
    1
  21148. @Noneya Business Why not attempt to refute my points instead of accusing me of a communist? If China's political system has shown to be viable for our country, then what's wrong with continuing supporting our government?
    1
  21149. But it also result in mass school shootings by gunman, due to ease of accessibility of guns to the public.
    1
  21150. ​ @truthreal3378 Please explain how China's actions didn't match the rhetoric. Zhou Enlai's Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence continue to form the basis of China's relations with other countries. But throughout 1960-1962, Nehru continually rejected proposed Chinese diplomatic settlements. And you said India saw Aksai Chin as its territory? The "Chin" in the name is understood by many sources (some of which are Indian) to mean "China". Also, building roads isn't the same as building military bases, which is what Nehru's aggressive "Forward Policy" was about. Furthermore how do you account for the 43 bases that went beyond the McMahon Line and on actual Chinese territory as recognized by India? Yet you claim that China is pushing boundaries?
    1
  21151. ​ @truthreal3378 As I've stated earlier, Britain itself did not recognize Tibetan independence from China. -In 1906, the British signed the Convention Between Great Britain and China Respecting Tibet (Chinese: 中英續訂藏印條約) concerning Tibet, in which Britain agreed not to annex Tibet or interfere in Tibet's political affairs. -In 1914, the British signed the Convention Between Great Britain, China, and Tibet, Simla in which the British recognize Chinese suzerainty over Tibet. These treaties both show that Britain regarded Tibet as part of China and should have consulted China before drawing the McMahon Line. Yet Britain drew the line anyway, and India still sticks to the McMahon Line (an artificial line drawn by foreigner) instead of negotiating a border with China that's mutually acceptable to both sides. How is this not the "colonial mentality" at work in India? If India was rid of its "colonial mentality" then they would negotiate a border with China that's according to established historical lines, rather than an artificial one drawn by the British.
    1
  21152. @truthreal3378 Once again, China merely built roads connecting Chinese territory, whereas India built military bases under Nehru's Forward Policy (as you've admitted) at the disputed border with China. Nehru refused proposed Chinese diplomatic settlements under the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, and even built 43 military bases beyond the McMahon Line and onto actual Chinese territory as recognized by India. How do you account for those bases that India built beyond the McMahon Line?
    1
  21153.  @truthreal3378  So what you're saying in short, is that whatever territory India recognizes as its own IS its own, whereas whatever territory China recognizes is not recognized as Chinese territory by India? Then how to have a peaceful dialogue and negotiate borders, when India is still living under the influence of the McMahon Line (drawn by the British)? China builds infrastructure such as roads, whereas India builds military bases under Nehru's aggressive "Forward Policy" then accuse China of not living up to the rhetoric of Zhou Enlai's Five Principles.
    1
  21154. @truthreal3378  You said: "English is one of our official languages, not our national language." So what's the national language of India then? China's national language is Mandarin Chinese.
    1
  21155. @truthreal3378 The same thing has happened to many American allies before and is bound to happen with US-India relations. It happened with South Vietnam during the Fall of Saigon, same with Afghanistan in the Fall of Kabul. The same is about to happen with Ukraine. As Henry Kissinger said it's fatal to be America's ally. You said: "India doesn't bend to anyone's will unless it serves our people." Surely, it is in the Indian people's interest to settle the border dispute with China? Preferably peacefully by negotiating a border treaty, acceptable to both sides. That would put an end to unnecessary bloodshed that's unfortunately been spilt over the border over the years. Yet even though India and China had 21 rounds of border talks, we still failed to resolve the border dispute, primarily because of India's strict adherence to the McMahon Line, drawn by the British.
    1
  21156. @D0MINIC7 You said:  "British didn't even recognised Mongolia as Independent during that period. But now it's an independent country" Who's talking about Mongolia? We're talking about Tibet and according to the 1906 and 1914 conventions, British recognised Chinese sovereignty over Tibet and agreed not to interfere with Tibet's political affairs. Even today Tibet is not an independent country, it's internationally recognised as part of China. Draw the map of China and Tibet is included as part of China. Also, the British have already left India, why do you continue to defend the former colonial master? Why India stick to the McMahon Line drawn by the British? Isn't this the colonial mentality of India at work here?
    1
  21157. @truthreal3378 You said: "but India’s claim came from old British maps and treaties, not just names." That's proof of India's Colonial Mentality at work. The British are foreigners to the region and have hardly any knowledge of the existing historical boundaries, yet the Indians treat the British maps as legitimate. Have you been so blinded with the "colonial mentality" that you can't even see how you are justify India's claims using British claims? You said: "Zhou Enlai’s Five Principles sound nice - peaceful coexistence, mutual respect - but China’s actions didn’t always line up." Again, show me proof where the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence didn't line up. China built roads on the Chinese territory of Aksai Chin, yet India claims the territory is India, because the British said so? And India built military bases in response to China building roads? You said: "For example, Indonesia is a separate country, and the name "Indo" itself does not imply that it is part of India." So which country other than China, is also named "Chin" then? You said: "Roads aren’t bases, true, but they’re strategic - China used them to move troops, not just mail." So many things have both civilian uses as well as military uses. Telephone cables can be used to transmit mail, or to send encrypted military messages. Fuel tankers can transport fuel for civilian use or for military use as well. How does that make China building roads an act of aggression? And Nehru's response was to build military bases at the disputed border with China? You said: "Nehru’s Forward Policy, with those 43 outposts, was a clumsy counter to that, not the start." Nehru built 60 military bases in total, and 43 of those bases were beyond the McMahon Line and into actual Chinese territory as recognized by India. You said: "Problem is, India didn’t recognize that land beyond the McMahon Line as China’s - it saw the Line as the border," Seriously? India didn't even recognize the land beyond the McMahon Line as China's? Then how exactly do you expect China to negotiate with a neighbor that refuses to recognize territory beyond their line as China's?
    1
  21158. @truthreal3378 You said: "The 1906 Convention was about trade, not borders, and predates Tibet’s de facto independence after the Qing fell in 1911." The 1906 Convention reaffirmed the Chinese possession of Tibet, and the British agreed not to annex or interfere in Tibet's political affairs. And Britain didn't even recognize Tibet as an independent country after the Qing fell. You said: "By 1914, Tibet was acting autonomously - issuing its own currency, running its government, and negotiating at Simla." It was still a breakaway province of China, and no country recognized Tibetan independence. Even in the Simla Convention, the British acknowledged Chinese suzerainty over Tibet. You said: "Britain didn’t need China’s approval for a bilateral deal with Tibet, which it saw as a functioning entity under loose suzerainty, not tight sovereignty." But it wasn't a bilateral deal. The official name of the deal was Convention Between Great Britain, China, and Tibet, meaning it's a trilateral deal. In the treaty, Britain also acknowledged Chinese suzerainty over Tibet, meaning that Britain did not recognize Tibet as an independent country.
    1
  21159. @truthreal3378 You said: "Calling it 'colonial mentality' misunderstands both India's post-colonial position and the historical reality." You literally said India’s claim came from old British maps and treaties, then how is it not the "colonial mentality" at work? Instead of negotiating a new border treaty with China (one that's acceptable to both sides), India still sticks to the McMahon Line drawn by the British. You said: "India isn’t bIindIy following coIoniaI policies - it’s upholding a boundary agreed upon between British India and Tibet, which existed as an independent party in that agreement." Even the British themselves did not recognize Tibet as an independent country, according to the 1906 and 1914 conventions, they recognized Chinese suzerainty over Tibet and agreed not to interfere in Tibet's political affairs. Furthermore, in the 1907 Convention between Great Britain and Russia -The Governments of Great Britain and Russia recognizing the suzerain rights of China in Thibet, -Article II. In conformity with the admitted principle of the suzerainty of China over Thibet, Great Britain and Russia engage not to enter into negotiations with Thibet except through the intermediary of the Chinese Government. Yet the British bypassed the Chinese intermediary and entered into negotiations with Tibet directly. You said: "In fact, China didn’t even control Tibet until 1950, long after the boundary was drawn, which makes China’s retroactive objection resemble a form of imperial revanchism, not antiColonial." Tibet was a breakaway province of China that was eventually reunified with the mainland in 1950. The McMahon Line was drawn by the British by taking advantage of the chaos and disorder of the fall of Qing in order to sign border deals with a state that Britain didn't even recognize as independent.
    1
  21160. @truthreal3378 You said: "The McMahon Line was agreed between British India and Tibet in March 1914" So the McMahon Line was drawn without both India's and China's consent. Because in 1914, India was still a British colony at that time, while Tibet was a breakaway region of China at that time. Fast forward till today, and India is no longer a British colony, and Tibet has been reunified with mainland China. So since India and China are now both sovereign countries, can't the China-India border be negotiated to a border that's acceptable to both parties? Why does India continue to stick to the McMahon Line when it was a line drawn without India's (not British India's) consent? Because of India's "Colonial Mentality" that's why. Even after the colonizer left, the minds of the people remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. Even throughout your words, you constantly defend the British's actions because they were your former colonial masters.
    1
  21161. @truthreal3378 "the US-India relationship is more of a partnership than an alliance." A partnership against who? Against Russia and China? It's because of India's involvement in alliances such as The Quad grouping, that Russia remains reluctant to trust India 100%. Whereas there is literally no daylight in the relationship between Russia and China, because we both that the US is determined to hold on to its hegemony and will make use of anything and anyone to achieve this goal. "In India, we have multiple languages spoken across the country, and that's why there is no single 'national language.' " Then why did you even bring up the topic of a national language? "Mandarin was made the national language to help unify the country, but it's worth noting that this decision has led to concerns about the marginalization of other languages and cultures." China takes steps to preserve various languages inside China. For example, in Inner Mongolia, the traditional Mongolian written script is still used for Mongolian dialect, while Outer Mongolia (aka Mongolia itself) uses the Cyrillic alphabet introduced by the Soviet Union. Even in Tibet, the Tibetans celebrate festivals such as the New Year (Losar), Saga Dawa (commemorating Buddha's life), Shoton (Yogurt Festival), and Monlam (Great Prayer Festival).
    1
  21162. @nithinv5990 "You got it completely wrong. The Chinese theory on India and other former colonies look at the West as superior is completely false." Who drew up India-China border? It was British cartographer Henry McMahon that drew up India's border with China, the McMahon Line (named after himself) without regard for existing historical boundaries between India and China, and without consulting China. It's basically a line drawn up by a foreigner to these parts, and yet India still insists on sticking to the McMahon Line, instead of working out a new border with China that's mutually agreeable.
    1
  21163. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21164. ​ @bappyroy1184 It's true that throughout China's history, China has been ruled by foreigners such as the Mongols and Manchus. But in the end, it's these foreign rulers, the Mongols and Manchus that ended up assimilating into Han Chinese culture. It was Kublai Khan, grandson of Genghis Khan, that choose to give up his Mongolian nomadic culture and proclaim himself Emperor of Yuan Dynasty China and live in the Chinese palace. His grandfather, Genghis Khan, purportedly never slept under a permanent roof his entire nomadic life. Likewise, the Manchu rulers of Qing Dynasty China have since assimilated into Han Chinese culture, and when Qing Dynasty fell, many Manchu had already adopted Han Chinese customs, languages and surnames. China was never fully colonized by the Japanese nor the Europeans. Parts of China were, such as Hong Kong by British, and Taiwan island by the Japanese, and yes, the "Colonial Mentality" is present among some Chinese in HK and TW. For example, when I spoke Mandarin in Hong Kong, some Hong Kongers (but not all) gave me the cold shoulder. But when I speak English in Hong Kong, many Hong Kongers started warming up to me.
    1
  21165. @RoyRoy-g5n Before the 1912 Bolshevik Revolution, Tsarist Russia was arguably the most impoverished country in Europe. Only about 15% of the population lived in towns, and fewer than 10% worked in industry. Russian society was overwhelmingly agrarian, dominated by peasants whose traditional household economies were extremely inefficient compared to agriculture in Western Europe or the United States. Russia was also technologically backward, and lagged far behind advanced capitalist countries like Great Britain and Germany. After the 1912 revolution, the Soviets transformed Russia into arguably the strongest country in Europe, both militarily as well as economically. During its heyday, the Soviet Union was the 2nd largest economy in the world (after the US) and had the largest military in Europe (that's why NATO was formed). The Soviet also made numerous advances in science and technology, they even launched the world's first satellite, Sputnik, ahead of the United States.
    1
  21166. @siddharthkalantri5076 Don't have to go all the way to the West to find them. Just start with Indians who insist that India should stick to the McMahon Line as the China-India border. A line drawn by British cartographer Henry McMahon, without regard for existing historical boundaries between India and China.
    1
  21167. ​ @siddharthkalantri5076 You said: "that i also agree if you agree with burma for that line what is the problem with India ?" Burma? Why are you still using the old colonial name for Myanmar? China and Myanmar both signed a border treaty in 1960 after negotiation to reach a solution acceptable to both sides. What has the Myanmar-China border even got to do with India then?
    1
  21168. ​ @siddharthkalantri5076 You said: "that line is non negociable for India china need to understand that" Why is it non negotiable? The McMahon Line was drawn by the British, and the British are foreigners to the region who lacked knowledge of existing historical boundaries. Even after independence, why does India continue to blindly stick to the McMahon Line, instead of negotiating a new border with China that's acceptable to both sides? Both Indians and Chinese are locals to the region, and with long history between India and China, why adhere to a line drawn by a foreigner to the region? It's because of the Indian colonial mentality, that's why they think the British drawn line cannot be modified, so what more proof do you need of the Indian colonial mentality?
    1
  21169. @siddharthkalantri5076 You said: "if your education system was so great then why it could not induct nationalism in your people of taiwan honkong and so on" Because Hong Kong is a former British colony. That's why I wrote: "Coloniality is still present today in the minds of people from former colonies (such as India, the Philippines, and even Hong Kong)." Taiwan island was also occupied by the Japanese during WWII, and their education system tries to induce separatism from mainland China. That's why for these states, even if their colonial master left, the minds of many of the local people (but not all) remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. "Decolonization of the mind" needs to take place to in order to free their minds from the colonial mentality.
    1
  21170. @FireFox-ch2tu You said: "lol the chines talk about nine dash line and cry about mcmahon line," In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. Vietnamese PM Pham van Dong wrote a diplomatic note to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai stating that they acknowledged the Spratly and Paracel Islands as being within Chinese territorial waters. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. (Source: Wikipedia: File: 1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai) The main difference between the 9 Dash Line and the McMahon Line was that the 9 Dash was drawn by locals whereas the McMahon Line was drawn by a foreigner (British) to the region.
    1
  21171. @FireFox-ch2tu You said: "lol the chines talk about nine dash line and cry about mcmahon line," Vietnamese PM Pham van Dong had acknowledged the Spratly and Paracel Islands as within Chinese territorial waters, in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. (Wikipedia: 1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai)
    1
  21172. ​ @siddharthkalantri5076 Then shouldn't you be using Brahmadesh, instead of the colonial term Burma? Even you acknowledged that it's a colonial term for Myanmar. Also, you've already answered your own question when you said: "following almost the same alignment as the McMahon Line." China made modifications to the McMahon Line and did not follow the McMahon Line exactly. There was minor land swap like you said, so that both asides reached a border deal that's acceptable to both sides, and it was achieved through peaceful dialogue. With flexibility, not rigidity. But when it came to India, India flat out rejected any concession and blindly stick to the McMahon Line (which clearly is an "imperialist" line, even when it was drawn over the China-Myanmar border.) Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai proposed the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence (和平共处五项原则) in the 50s to build India-China relations and to settle the border dispute. But throughout 1960-1962, Nehru continually rejected proposed Chinese diplomatic settlements. Instead Nehru pursued an aggressive "Forward Policy" involving building military bases at the disputed border with China. In fact, through Nehru's "Forward Policy", India built 60 military bases at the disputed border with China, including 43 bases that were located northwards and beyond the McMahon Line, and on actual Chinese territory (as recognized by India).
    1
  21173. ​ @siddharthkalantri5076 You said: "China saw Aksai Chin as strategically important to connect Tibet and Xinjiang," So according to you, China has strategic interests in Aksai Chin and we can understand that. But what value is Aksai Chin to India? India is only sticking to the McMahon Line because of colonial mentality. Look, even you said: "that line is non negociable for India china need to understand that" just goes to show India's rigidity instead of flexibility. "China needed Myanmar’s help to remove Kuomintang (KMT) fighters who had taken refuge there. That’s why it settled the border peacefully." China also needed India's cooperation in capturing an escaped separatist leader. The 14th Dalai Lama had accepted American money in order to carry out separatist activities in Tibet. Declassified CIA files revealed that a total of $1,735,000 (equivalent to $17,590,145 in 2024) was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964. But not only did India not return the Dalai Lama, they provided asylum for him, which led to suspicions among Chinese leaders that India wanted to take Tibet for itself. Otherwise, why would India provide asylum to an agent of the CIA?
    1
  21174. ​ @siddharthkalantri5076 So you oppose China claiming Tibet, Hong Kong, Taiwan, while you see nothing wrong with India eyeing Pakistan's territory in Jammu and Kashmir? India can annex Tripura, Manipur, Goa, Jammu & Kashmir, Sikkim, etc, for historical reasons, then can't China claim Tibet, Hong Kong, Taiwan for historical reasons as well? Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China, and incorporated them into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchus did the same and made Tibet part of Qing Dynasty China. Even though Tibet broke free of China in 1912, but it was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951. It's astonishing how you claim I have double standards, when you so brazenly exhibit such behavior yourself. And once again, the fact that India just blindly adhere to the McMahon Line just goes to show how deep the colonial mentality has affected the minds of Indians, such as yourself.
    1
  21175. ​ @siddharthkalantri5076 Look, the Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (十七条协议) affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there's this legally binding document acknowledging that Tibet is part of China, even India recognizes that Tibet is part of China today. If you draw the Map of China, Tibet is included as part of China.
    1
  21176. ​@siddharthkalantri5076 You said: "Jammu and Kashmir is legally a part of India according to the Instrument of Accession signed by the Maharaja" And Tibet is legally part of China according to Seventeen Point Agreement that was signed by the Tibetan plenipotentiaries themselves in 1951 and ratified by the Dalai Lama himself. Why is it that you accept J&K as rightfully part of India, but cannot accept that Tibet is legally part of China? You said: "and the king of Jammu and Kashmir chose to join India." So only the King of J&K choose to join India, but have you asked the people living in Jammu and Kashmir whether they want to join India? In fact, the majority of the population of J&K are Muslims and Pakistan saw that they were under a Hindu ruler. Just because the Hindu ruler wants to join India, does it mean that the majority Muslim population of J&K want to join India? You said: "The people of Tibet, Hong Kong, and Taiwan have expressed clear resistance to being under Chinese control," So? India has face separatist movements in Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab, Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur, and Arunachal Pradesh, so why don't you support those regions separation from India then?
    1
  21177. @siddharthkalantri5076 India's own history and borders also reflect that Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and even parts of Afghanistan were historically part of Indian empires. Pakistan also shares the same history as India, they were both part of British India until the partition in 1947, and they have similar historical claims over those regions (including Jammu & Kashmir). Same goes for Bangladesh, they were originally East Pakistan before India intervened and cause Pakistan to loose control over their territory. Yet you claim modern-day India respects the sovereignty of neighboring countries, then why didn't India respected Bangladesh as Pakistan's territory?
    1
  21178. @siddharthkalantri5076 You said: "Since he chose to merge with India, there was no requirement for a referendum." So the ordinary people of Jammu & Kashmir never had a choice whether they wanted merger with India, only their king gets to decide that. And the king of Jammu and Kashmir was a Hindu, of course he'll want to join India, how is that democratic? You said: "Jammu has a Hindu majority (around 60%)." We're talking about Jammu and Kashmir, who said anything about Jammu alone? Muslims constitute around 68.31% of the total population of Jammu and Kashmir, so the Muslims are the majority. You said: "Ladakh has a Buddhist and Shia Muslim majority (not Sunni)." Shia Muslims are still Muslims You said: "Only the Kashmir Valley has a Muslim majority." Yet India continues to eye Pakistan's territory of Kashmir (even going so far as to calling it POK) even though it has Muslim majority. You said: "So, calling the entire region a Muslim-majority state is misleading." Muslims constitute around 68.31% of the entire region, so it is a fact. You said: "Unlike Tibet, which is under strict Chinese rule, Jammu & Kashmir holds regular elections, where people freely choose their leaders." Who says there are no elections in Tibet? The local people in Tibet hold elections at various levels to elect their leaders. It starts with people's congresses in villages and towns, then next level is municipal districts and counties, and so on. Ngapoi Ngawang Jigme is elected to be the chairman of the Tibet Autonomous Region. You said: " If the people didn't want to be part of India, why would they vote in elections?" What else could they do? The fact remains that there was no referendum among the local people of Jammu & Kashmir on whether to join India. Only their Hindu king was given the decision whether to join Pakistan or India. You said: "If Pakistan stopped interfering, there would be no major issue in Kashmir." It's not as though India didn't interfere in Pakistan's internal affairs. India interfered in East Pakistan and supported Bangladesh independence from Pakistan. You said: "Punjab is peaceful. There is no demand for separation, no army deployment, and people live normally." Same with Tibet. Tibet is peaceful and there is no demand for separation, no army deployment and the people there live normally. You said: "Jammu & Kashmir’s accession was legal, and it functions as part of a democratic India." What democracy when there was no referendum for the people of Jammu & Kashmir to vote on whether they want to join India or Pakistan? Instead of democracy, only the Hindu King gets to make this decision. The people of Jammu & Kashmir never had a real choice.
    1
  21179. @siddharthkalantri5076 Because India and Pakistan are equal at birth. There was never a self-ruled country called India before 1947, it was the colony British India that was partitioned into India and Pakistan in 1947. Pakistan's history is the same as India's before 1947. You said: "India never divided itself; it was Pakistan that separated." It was specifically called partition meaning division, not a separation. Again, there wasn't any self-ruled country called India before 1947, it was British India that partitioned into two independent nations, India and Pakistan, so how are they not equal? Whatever happens inside East Pakistan and West Pakistan is Pakistan's internal affair. India chose to involve itself inside Pakistan's internal affair then how can you claim that India respects the sovereignty of neighboring countries?
    1
  21180. @siddharthkalantri5076 Pakistan's territory of Balochistan is being jointly developed with China. China is preparing to provide 10,000 solar panel sets to be distributed to underprivileged communities in Balochistan. The Chinese Embassy in Pakistan is also set to donate household solar units and other forms of assistance to the people of Balochistan. The provincial government of Balochistan has set aside 4,000 acres for the construction of the new $230 million Gwadar International Airport. The problem is the Balochistan militants that specifically target Chinese engineers in order to hinder infrastructure projects that develop Balochistan. Both Pakistan and the United Kingdom believed that India was providing support to the Baloch militants. The militant commanders had sought medical treatment in India's hospitals. In one such case, a militant commander in charge of Khuzdar city was based in Delhi for at least six months in 2017 while he underwent extensive treatment for kidney-related ailments.
    1
  21181. @siddharthkalantri5076 Regarding Punjab, there was a recent assassination of a Sikh leader in Canada who wanted a separate state for the Sikhs in Punjab. The leader was targeted even though he had fled to Canada. Yet in Tibet's case, the 14th Dalai Lama is still alive even after he accepted American money to conduct separatist activities in Tibet against the Central People's Government, just goes to show how tolerant China is towards separatist leaders, compared to India regarding Punjab.
    1
  21182. @siddharthkalantri5076 "Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam"? India doesn't even treat their brothers and sisters living in neighboring Pakistan like a family at all, how to treat the world as one family? Pakistanis who were literally born from the same blood and having gone through the same history as India before the partition, yet India treat them not like a brother but more like the enemy. And what happens between the neighbor and his wife is largely their own domestic affair. You as an outsider have no right to interfere in their domestic issue. At most if they disturb and damage public property then the police may be called in. Also, if you choose intervention then you can no longer claim that India doesn't intervene in other sovereign countries internal affairs. India has been bullying its smaller neighbor Pakistan for decades. Not only did they intervene in Pakistan's internal affair, and cause Pakistan to lose control over East Pakistan, they are also eyeing Pakistan's territory of Kashmir, claiming its part of India. And there wasn't even any referendum asking the people of Jammu & Kashmir if they want to join India or Pakistan, only their Hindu king gets to make such an important decision, not the people.
    1
  21183. @siddharthkalantri5076 So the British imposed their colonial rules onto British India during it's partition, then why continue to stick to British rules such as McMahon Line? Indians had no choice back when India was a British colony, yet instead of abandoning these colonial rules, India still insist on the McMahon Line with China, then how is this not proof of the colonial mentality? The fact is that India was never a democracy, even as the British ruled India for nearly 90 years, then why do Indians continue to follow the rules laid down by their colonial masters, instead of rising up and beyond those colonial rules? Partitioning British India resulted in the weakening of the once unified country, as well as creating separate sovereign states that have their own way of thinking. This is why China insist on retaining control over our territories in Tibet, Hong Kong and Taiwan. We don't want to end up like India and Pakistan, both brothers that continue to fight between themselves, while the British are laughing from far away. You said India accepted partition to avoid a civil war, but ended up with 4 actual wars with its neighbor. Even during the partitioning process, there was large-scale violence and deaths (estimates of 200,000 to 2 million). So much unnecessary bloodshed, that could have been avoided had British India insist on keep itself intact. If over 500 princely states had the same choice, and their rulers made decisions, not public referendums, then how is this democracy then? Only the authoritarian rulers of princely states get to make such an important decision such as whether to join India or Pakistan, not the ordinary people living in those 500 states, so how can you claim India has will of the people? Yet you still continue to adhere to the laws laid down by Britain, the colonial master? Pakistan refuses to withdraw its army because there is no guarantee that India will follow through and withdraw their own forces. India demands Kasmir as their integral part, not a disputed territory, so there is no guarantee that India will abide by the UNSC resolution if Pakistan withdraws its army first. So, there is a heavy risk for Pakistan to suffer a strategic defeat. Also, you keep bringing up Pakistan's atrocities in Bangladesh, but have you looked and those made by the Indian Army in Kashmir?
    1
  21184. @siddharthkalantri5076 I've already told you, the Tibetans plenipotentiaries signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (十七条协议), how was it forcibly occupied? And I've already told you that the 14th Dalai Lama had accepted American money to carry out separatist activities in Tibet. Declassified CIA files revealed that a total of $1,735,000 (equivalent to $17,590,145 in 2024) was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964. Also, who says China restricts religious freedom in Tibet? So many foreigners have visited Lhasa (you can find their videos of Lhasa online) and in those videos you can see religious Tibetans praying, spinning prayer-tops, performing full-body kowtows on the ground in open worship. Within Lhasa's monasteries, Tibetan monks chant prayers and debate with each other as per Tibetan Buddhist tradition. Seriously, just search videos on Lhasa to see what I mean. As for IOK (India Occupied Kashmir) the Modi government abolished the autonomous status of Kashmir, and the Indian security forces continue to carry out repressive policies including arbitrary detention, extrajudicial killings, and other serious abuses. According to Human Rights Watch, Kashmiris are unable to exercise their right to free expression, association, and peaceful assembly because they fear they will be arrested, thrown in prison without trial for months, even years. Also, you talk about India's pluralism, yet Modi inaugurated a new Hindu temple built on the site of a historic Mughal-era mosque that was razed in the town of Ayodhya.
    1
  21185. @siddharthkalantri5076 I've already told you, the Tibetans plenipotentiaries signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (十七条协议), how was it forcibly occupied? And I've already told you that the 14th Dalai Lama had accepted American money to carry out separatist activities in Tibet. Declassified CIA files revealed that a total of $1,735,000 (equivalent to $17,590,145 in 2024) was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964. Also, who says China restricts religious freedom in Tibet? So many foreigners have visited Lhasa (you can find their videos of Lhasa online) and in those videos you can see religious Tibetans praying, spinning prayer-tops, performing full-body kowtows on the ground in open worship. Within Lhasa's monasteries, Tibetan monks chant prayers and debate with each other as per Tibetan Buddhist tradition. Seriously, just search videos on Lhasa to see what I mean. As for IOK (India Occupied Kashmir) the Modi government abolished the autonomous status of Kashmir and Modi also inaugurated a new Hindu temple built on the site of a historic Mughal-era mosque that was razed in the town of Ayodhya.
    1
  21186. @siddharthkalantri5076 I've already told you, the Tibetans plenipotentiaries signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (十七条协议), how was it forcibly occupied? And I've already told you that the 14th Dalai Lama had accepted American money to carry out separatist activities in Tibet. Declassified CIA files revealed that a total of $1,735,000 (equivalent to $17,590,145 in 2024) was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964. Also, who says China restricts religious freedom in Tibet? So many foreigners have visited Lhasa (you can find their videos of Lhasa online) and in those videos you can see religious Tibetans praying, spinning prayer-tops, performing full-body kowtows on the ground in open worship. Within Lhasa's monasteries, Tibetan monks chant prayers and debate with each other as per Tibetan Buddhist tradition. As for IOK (India Occupied Kashmir) the Modi government abolished the autonomous status of Kashmir, and the Indian security forces continue to carry out repressive policies including arbitrary detention, extrajudicial killings, and other serious abuses. According to Human Rights Watch, Kashmiris are unable to exercise their right to free expression, association, and peaceful assembly because they fear they will be arrested, thrown in prison without trial for months, even years. Also, you talk about India's pluralism, yet Modi inaugurated a new Hindu temple built on the site of a historic Mughal-era mosque that was razed in the town of Ayodhya.
    1
  21187. @siddharthkalantri5076 I've already told you, the Tibetans plenipotentiaries signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (十七条协议), and that the 14th Dalai Lama had accepted American money to carry out separatist activities in Tibet. Declassified CIA files revealed that a total of $1,735,000 (equivalent to $17,590,145 in 2024) was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964. So many foreigners have visited Lhasa (you can find their videos of Lhasa online) and in those videos you can see religious Tibetans praying, spinning prayer-tops, performing full-body kowtows on the ground in open worship. Within Lhasa's monasteries, Tibetan monks chant prayers and debate with each other as per Tibetan Buddhist tradition. As for IOK (India Occupied Kashmir) the Modi government abolished the autonomous status of Kashmir. In 2024, Modi also inaugurated a new Hindu temple built on the site of a historic Mughal-era mosque that was razed in the town of Ayodhya.
    1
  21188. ​ @siddharthkalantri5076 The 14th Dalai Lama had accepted American money to carry out separatist activities in Tibet. Declassified CIA files revealed that a total of $1,735,000 (equivalent to $17,590,145 in 2024) was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964. Many foreigners have visited Lhasa (you can find their videos of Lhasa online) and in those videos you can see religious Tibetans praying, spinning prayer-tops, performing full-body kowtows on the ground in open worship. Within Lhasa's monasteries, Tibetan monks chant prayers and debate with each other as per Tibetan Buddhist tradition. As for IOK (India Occupied Kashmir) the Modi government abolished the autonomous status of Kashmir. In 2024, Modi also inaugurated a new Hindu temple built on the site of a historic Mughal-era mosque that was razed in the town of Ayodhya.
    1
  21189. ​ @siddharthkalantri5076 Many foreigners have visited Lhasa (you can find their videos of Lhasa online) and in those videos you can see religious Tibetans praying, spinning prayer-tops, performing full-body kowtows on the ground in open worship. Within Lhasa's monasteries, Tibetan monks chant prayers and debate with each other as per Tibetan Buddhist tradition. As for IOK (India Occupied Kashmir) the Modi government abolished the autonomous status of Kashmir. In 2024, Modi also inaugurated a new Hindu temple built on the site of a historic Mughal-era mosque that was razed in the town of Ayodhya.
    1
  21190. @siddharthkalantri5076 If IOK (India Occupied Kashmir) was so free then why did the Indian government remove the autonomous status of Kashmir? Have you seen what the Indian Security Forces done to the population of IOK? Also, in 2024, the Modi government inaugurated a Hindu temple built upon the razed ruins of a Mughal-era Mosque, so what Indian plurality are you talking about? Whereas in Tibet, many foreigners have visited Lhasa (you can find their videos of Lhasa online) and in those videos you can see religious Tibetans praying, spinning prayer-tops, performing full-body kowtows on the ground in open worship. Within Lhasa's monasteries, Tibetan monks chant prayers and debate with each other as per Tibetan Buddhist tradition.
    1
  21191. ​ @siddharthkalantri5076 You said: "And just as Germany was reunited, one day POK will also return to India." East and West Germany were originally one country, Germany. Likewise, Tibet was historically part of Yuan Dynasty China and Qing Dynasty China, before it broke free briefly before being reunified with mainland China by 1951. But Kashmir was never historically part of India, when has the Indian government ever controlled all of Kashmir? And have you heard of the human rights abuses on Kashmiri in IOK (Indian Occupied Kashmir) by the Indian Army, Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), and Border Security Personnel (BSF)? They range from mass killings, enforced disappearances, torture, rape and sexual abuse to political repression and suppression of freedom of speech.
    1
  21192. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21193. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  21194. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21195.  @nct9466  Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors (just ask the expats) but many Westerners are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands with suspicion.
    1
  21196. President Trump flipped on many of his campaign promises, so what makes Filipinos think Trump will go to war for Philippines sake? He himself has many businesses running in China, but what has Philippines have to offer for him?
    1
  21197.  @k.bowers8372  If your American companies want to come to China, set up shop here and do business in China, then of course your companies should abide by Chinese laws while in China. Here's how the conversation goes: USA: We want YOU, China to build our goods at cheap prices to give us an edge over the competition. China: Sure thing, but we'll need access to your blueprints, your schematics and sensitive information, in order to build the product to spec USA: Done!
    1
  21198.  @stopchinesecolonialism172  Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by the rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (fine china) which were in great demand throughout the ancient world. Take Han Chinese traditional clothing Hanfu (汉服) for example and it has 5,000 years of history and even the Japanese Kimono and Korean Hanbok clothing have their origins in Chinese Hanfu. Video: Beautiful Traditional Costume: Han Chinese Clothing (Hanfu) youtu.be/T6CucJxiWec?t=5
    1
  21199. Good News, Gonzalo Lira is alive and well. Video:youtu.be/R2yeSOcNlgE
    1
  21200.  @patienceobongo  Taiwan island an inalienable part of China
    1
  21201.  @patienceobongo  The people of Taiwan ARE Chinese. They have an army because of the Nationalist Kuomintang lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Taiwan island. But if you look at Taiwan's constitution, it's stated that Taiwan is part of China. You said: "How do you define Chinese - Uighurs?" Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizen by birth, and they learn Mandarin (national language of China), learn Chinese history and develop a sense of belonging to their homeland, China. Wouldn't you consider African Americans as Americans?
    1
  21202. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  21203. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  21204. Undoubtedly, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  21205. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  21206. China prioritize saving lives at the expense of business. Whereas the West prioritize saving businesses at the expense of lives.
    1
  21207. As of December 2017, China had the largest stock of highway legal light-duty plug-ins with over 1.2 million domestically built passenger cars. China also dominates in plug-in electric bus deployment, with its stock reaching 343,500 units in 2016 out of global stock of about 345,000 vehicles. Source: Electric car use by country wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_car_use_by_country But look at President Trump withdrawing USA from the 2017 Paris Climate Accord, thus freeing USA from limiting its CO2 emissions.
    1
  21208. +Chuqiao Guo Chinese will tell our future children that the Earth is "destroyed" because Westerners been polluting the Earth since 300 years when the Industrial Revolution first started in 1700s. If you claim China don't care about the Earth, then why did President Trump withdrew from the 2017 Paris Climate Accord (thus no longer restricting US CO2 emissions) whereas China ratified the Paris Climate Accord? Which country is the world's largest producer of renewable energy? China built the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to fuel our growth, making China the world's largest producer of hydroelectric energy. The Largest Dam in The World youtube.com/watch?v=b8cCsUBYSkw In Solar Power, the current largest photovoltaic power station in the world is the 850 MW Longyangxia Dam Solar Park, in Qinghai, China. The world's largest off-shore solar farm is located in Anhui province of China. World's largest floating solar farm in China youtube.com/watch?v=qKpYH5SYUeo You are the type of person that watch too much biased Western anti-China propaganda and start to hate China for our efforts to modernize China and yet preserve the Earth, despite our later start in industrialization. Every country exploit the Earth's resources to advance their country, so why can't China do the same?
    1
  21209. +Cq Guo You disagree that the cutting carbon emission requirement is imposed on China by western countries? But when did I ever said that it was Western countries that impose cutting CO2 emissions on China? At the very beginning of this whole thread I clearly said: "So why do some Western people still impose their "clean" energy practices on other countries?" Also, you implied earlier that I was somehow "brainwashed" by the Chinese Government, and that I should undo the brainwashing. I don't take kindly to that remark, given that you know absolutely nothing about me. I mean, why are you making personal insinuations against me, instead of attacking my points?
    1
  21210. +Aaron Giddens Didn't you read what I posted 2 months ago? China built the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam making China the largest producer of hydroelectricity. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtube.com/watch?v=b8cCsUBYSkw China is the largest producer of Solar Energy and the current largest photovoltaic power station in the world is the 850 MW Longyangxia Dam Solar Park in Qinghai, China. China even built the world's largest floating solar park in Anhui province. China. World's largest floating solar farm in Eastern China youtube.com/watch?v=qKpYH5SYUeo China is the largest producer of Wind energy and the Gansu Wind Farm in China is the largest onshore wind farm in the world. Source:Wikipedia Wind Power wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power Try to keep up, newbie to this thread!
    1
  21211.  @dknowles60  Remember 50 years ago, the river Thames in London was so badly polluted that it was declared biologically dead? London also had such bad air quality, and there was even a Great Smog of London. Fast forward to the present and London has cleaned itself up. So who's to say China will never have clean air and water someday in the future?
    1
  21212. +dknowles60 said "China has not brought any tech to clean up its air and water" As of September 2018, China had the largest stock of highway legal light-duty plug-in electric vehicles (PEV) with almost 2 million domestically built passenger cars. In electric buses, China dominates with over 99.5% of the world's deployed electric buses. In 2017, China sold more light duty PEVs than Europe and USA. Top-selling light-duty plug-in electric vehicle global markets by country or region as of December 2017 wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Top_PEV_global_markets_stock_2017_final_with_California.png#mw-jump-to-license
    1
  21213. +dknowles60 Why you keep on repeating the same point? I mean, 1994 was only merely 26 years ago! (from 2018) so what makes you think China can clean up all our pollution in just two decades? China is the world's most populous country with about 5 times the population of USA, so why do you compare USA with China? Where is your logic here?
    1
  21214. Brian Kaz They could always change the venue to Beijing, since Kim has been to Beijing before.
    1
  21215. Falun Dafa was founded in 1992 (only 26 years ago) by Li Hongzhi, while hijacking traditions from Taoism, Buddhism, and traditional Qigong practices. That should already sound off alarm bells that its actually a cult, and the Falun Dafa followers believed their founder to be capable of curing all diseases. There are some examples of early-stage cancer patients who refuse to seek medical treatment and instead choose to donate their savings to Li Hongzhi in hope of him curing them. The cancer patients died in the end.
    1
  21216.  @christianempire3909  Those healthy organs would otherwise be dead and rotting in the ground, but thanks to China, they will be put to good use to save lives in Western countries instead.
    1
  21217.  @christianempire3909  Honestly speaking, why Western countries let Muslims step all over your country's laws? Muslim refugees migrate to Western countries but are under zero pressure to assimilate into their predominantly Christian host countries, much to the disgruntlement of locals. They retain their old traditions, like Muslim women wearing headveil in public, instead of adopting their host traditions.
    1
  21218.  @christianempire3909  Mao Zedong was only human and made mistakes like one. The communists members worshipped him and lied to Mao, grossly exaggerating growth figures and bountiful harvests, so Mao himself was unaware of the dire situation and food shortages, because his advisors deceived him. How can you blame him entirely for bad weather conditions such as flooding and drought, leading to destruction of crops and poor harvest? At least the CCP has long admitted to the failure of Mao's policies and Chinese people have moved on. Even Mao Zedong himself made self criticism of his policies and stepped down from being State Chairman.
    1
  21219. +Christian Empire China was once dirt-poor, starving, war-torn country in the past, but today Chinese people have access to food, to education, housing, basic healthcare, as well as modern technology like cars, smartphones, computers, electronics, the Internet, WiFi, mobile data networks, and soon to be 5G network implemented countrywide! With just a single app WeChat, people in China can make payments, shop online (Taobao), make purchases, have them shipped to your doorstep, book flights, book dental appointments, book taxis, pay the fare, transfer funds, get laundry done, and so on. Even WhatsApp is unable to do so many things, and they are copying some of WeChat's features. 20 amazing things that Chinese people do in WeChat Source: techinasia (dot) com/how-wechat-is-really-used-in-china
    1
  21220. Seems like Pelosi want's the same "beautiful sight to behold" to occur in the Taiwan Strait as well, with Chinese fighting Chinese.
    1
  21221. In the first video he says Putin is a brutal dictator who kills his political opponents. Now he's saying he supports Isreal's invasion of Gaza.
    1
  21222.  @johnfarmer3506  You said "The ccp has killed 85 million Chinese." China's population in the 1950s was around 500 million, so you're saying the Communist Party of China killed around 17% of our population? Then why is China currently the country with the world's largest population at 1.4 billion (nearly triple the size since 1950s).
    1
  21223.  @johnfarmer3506  Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. Here's the population of China from 1950 to 2021 (today) and overall, China's population actually grew during Mao Era, so where did you get your bloated death toll of 85 million Chinese dead? macrotrends.net/countries/CHN/china/population
    1
  21224.  @blaisetzu  What makes you claim China is incapable of creating new pop culture? The popular Tik Tok culture of sharing short length videos originated in China, under the parent company Bytedance. Today, Tik Tok is arguably the most downloaded app in the world and youths all over the world enjoy the short length format that Tik Tok offers.
    1
  21225.  @chesterneilmaringal9708  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  21226.  @gbenay  If you claim Taiwan is an independent country then why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there something stopping Taiwan from joining the UN? Then that means Taiwan isn't independent after all.
    1
  21227.  @alanliu6848  Should this apply to Chinese Americans as well? Telling them to leave the United States because they are somehow unwanted?
    1
  21228.  @alanliu6848  There's this saying that: "You can take the Chinese out of China, but you can't take the China out of Chinese". Many Chinese retain strong cultural roots with their motherland, so why force Chinese to change their hearts? America is the Land of the Free, then can't some Chinese continue to support their motherland (such as competing for China in the Olympics) even while abroad?
    1
  21229.  @alanliu6848  Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that the cost of living in America is kept lower than it should be. Think about the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent elsewhere, on things like cars, housing luxury brands and so on. Isn't that why many Americans often flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money?
    1
  21230.  @yct3369  You spoke of non-compliance with safety regulations in food and construction industries in China, but China can afford to feed our 1.4 billion people (representing around 20% of the world's population) with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export to other countries. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: Wikipedia: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities As for construction, China's infrastructure construction is among the most extensive in the world. China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length.
    1
  21231. Here's a compilation of what the journalists have been saying about China's economy 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy.
    1
  21232. I've seen even the less developed countries spraying disinfectants along public areas, but why isn't America doing the same thing, despite being the epicentre?
    1
  21233. United States supported Saudi Arabian Crown Prince killing of a journalist, but not the Thai Monarchy's anti-defamation laws.
    1
  21234.  @BINI_Maloi_Colet  Everyone knows the US is in decline and China is rising. As long as peace prevails, the US will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise. So before that happens, there's a window of opportunity to start a conflict in Asia, and drive China's economic growth down, and that's why US is seeking to provoke a new conflict.
    1
  21235. Matt Right You had called it the UN court of justice, so what exactly is the UN court of justice? Philippines did not submit the problem to ICJ, it submitted it to a non-UN agency instead, the Permanent Court of Arbitration.
    1
  21236.  @el-_-grando-_-_-scabandri  Baidu's Ernie 4 AI model has outperformed GPT 4 in Tang Dynasty poetry, according to CEO Robin Li Yanhong. Also Kai-Fu Lee's firm, 01AI has Yi-Large large model which has surpassed GPT-4 in reasoning and five other aspects in several benchmarks.
    1
  21237.  @mal7344  In this case, "IF" is a comparison, not a speculation. He's comparing the scenario that if data was oil in this age of AI, then China would be Saudi Arabia. Therefore it's not a speculation.
    1
  21238.  @petersinclair3997  About the Opium Wars, during the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  21239. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21240. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  21241.  @TacticalMayo  USA can't even see where they'll be in 10 years time, because their Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years.
    1
  21242. Those Western Journalists clearly know the truth, they've done numerous pieces before on the Nazism in Ukraine, and they clearly knew what that Red Eagle Nazi symbol meant that's why they blurred it out in the video. It's pure disinformation on Western MSM part.
    1
  21243.  @Pepperstein  Have you actually been to China and see what its like for yourself?
    1
  21244.  @Pepperstein  Did you know China is world's 4th most visited country according to World Tourism Rankings, as well as being the most popular tourist destination in Asia, surpassing even other Asian destinations like Japan, Korea, Thailan, etc? Source: World Tourism rankings wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings 1. France (86.9 million) 2. Spain (81.8 million) 3. United States (60.7 million) 4. China (60.7 million) <-- 5. Italy (58.3 million) 6. Mexico (39.3 million) In Asia-Pacific Region, 1. Mainland China (60.7 million) <-- 2. Thailand (35.4 million) 3. Japan (28.7 million) 4. Hong Kong (27.9 million) 5. Malaysia (26.0 million) 6. Macau (17.3 million) Why don't you come to China and see what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  21245.  @Pepperstein  China is also home to world's largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers even experimented by balancing small objects on their edges (like coins, pens, smartphones) near the window of a train moving at 350 kph, and the objects remained undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long periods. Here is one such video: Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE
    1
  21246.  @Pepperstein  China is world's 3rd country to independently send people into space, after USA and USSR. In 2008, China had our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut (Chinese astronaut) left the Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft and ventured into space, making China the 3rd country to have successfully conducted extravehicular activity in space. Video: China's first spacewalk youtube.com/watch?v=9PAkbT4kTpI&t=280 China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, and even Japan, Korea and India have not launched manned space missions of their own. We are making Asians proud by showing that Asians are just as capable of achieving equally impressive feats in space.
    1
  21247.  @Pepperstein  In 2016, China launched world's first quantum satellite, Micius 墨子 and demonstrated that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere, smashing the previous record of quantum entanglement held on Earth. Video: China's Quantum Satellite youtube.com/watch?v=4QlcKuxDGrs Quantum entanglement (in a nutshell) is when two subatomic particles become an "entangled pair", able to influence their quantum states (won't go into detail here) seemingly regardless of the distance involved. One particle could be on the surface of the Earth, and the other on the surface of the Moon, and theoretically, they can still influence each other with no information (known to current science) passing in between them. The longest record for quantum entanglement on Earth is 143 km in at experiment in the Canary Islands. But China has allowed two stations (Delingha and Lijiang station) located 1200 km apart to communicate directly, through our quantum satellite, thus breaking the previous record and showcasing that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere.
    1
  21248.  @psychorameses  Have you seriously not seen barbed wire around schools? Schools often have barbed wire for security purposes to protect the premises from burglars. And haven't you ever heard of the term "boarding school"?
    1
  21249. ​ @sillylittlemonkey7130  "Why would they feel the need to take down the watchtowers?" It could be because the place was originally intended to house possibly dangerous Uighur extremists, but since conduct has been good, the authorities decide to remove the watchtowers and convert the region into a recreation sports field.
    1
  21250.  @psychorameses  Here is video about life as Chinese high school student (in Anshan, Liaoning, China) and is it really any different from the video here? Chinese students wear uniforms, attend classes, play sports, etc, and so on. The only major difference here is that the Uighurs are in a boarding school that's all. Video: Chinese High School for a Day youtube.com/watch?v=H6RlWqL2W8Y
    1
  21251.  @HARRISJCLIPS  Why would the government force the Uighurs to eat pork and drink alcohol? And if you go to some Muslim countries like Malaysia, Indonesia, etc, they drink alcohol too and smoke cigarettes too, despite being Muslims. Pork dishes are available that's all and Uighurs are encouraged to try some, but what makes you think the government force them to eat pork and drink alcohol?
    1
  21252.  @fahadmalik8862  Look at the Westerners and they are bending over backwards to accommodate Muslims. Refugees are fleeing their conflict ridden Islamic countries and flooding the West and are under little pressure to adapt to their predominantly Christian host countries, much to the disgruntlement of local Westerners. Instead of assimilating, Muslims continue their traditions like men taking on multiple wives, and women wearing Muslim headveil out in public, and secretly many Westerners are angry that Muslims aren't assimilating into their culture, but they are unable to voice their honest opinions for fear of being labelled "racist" (even though Islam is not a race) or Islamophobe, because of a culture of political correctness. The Muslims take Westerners silence as acceptance of their ways, so they are under little pressure to change.
    1
  21253.  @0x404-w5w  Why don't you attempt to refute my points, instead of hurling insults against me?
    1
  21254.  @CoolidgeGaming  Modern China was built by the sweat, blood, tears and sacrifice of Chinese people and the government, to turn a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, into an economic juggernaut today, the world's factory (Made in China) a growing scientific and innovative power, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army and China today has strong global presence as well as being influential player of world politics. The Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again, which government body is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, India, Europe and USA. Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm And its all been achieved under CCP leadership.
    1
  21255.  @CoolidgeGaming  According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China grew from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat, considering that China is world's most populous country, yet achieving 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy rate. So why do you claim life is sh**ty in China? Have you actually been to China yourself and see what life is like here?
    1
  21256.  @CoolidgeGaming  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China, and then incorporated those territories into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors did a similar thing centuries later during the Qing dynasty. So what's wrong with China reclaiming Tibet? Tibet was part of China for longer than the history of American colonialism by Westerners.
    1
  21257. The Chinese government has not instituted any formal guidance or regulation barring the use of iPhones, addressing media reports, a Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson said. ... Source: CNBC Meanwhile, Huawei is banned in the United States.
    1
  21258.  Charles Schmid  Nazism = Fascism = White Supremacy. And Ted Cruz supported the white supremacists during the January 6th Capitol Hill insurrection, yet you're claiming China is Nazi?
    1
  21259.  @chronokoks  So YouTube is blocked in China but not banned. Many foreign companies that come to China and set up shop here rely on accessing Western websites like YouTube, Facebook, Google, to operate, so the government issue VPN licences to these companies to allow them to access those websites. As long as people use one of the government-approved VPN providers, then nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China. Which person has been arrested just for login into YouTube while in China?
    1
  21260.  @lucaserwell5724  I have gotten the common flu before many times before, yet I can still taste and smell. But one of the symptoms of Covid-19 is that you lose your sense of smell and taste, then how is Covid-19 indistinguishable from the common cold?
    1
  21261.  @SwedeenXBL  You said: "Are you acting like you have a reading disability or do you actually have one?" You can't answer the question so you resort to hurling personal insults against me? You've made it clear that you "wouldn't count Hrabove as Ukrainian territory" then why can't you admit that you would consider Crimea as Russian territory? You said: "Yes, you're correct NATO was also formed in response to Soviet military might." But today the Soviet Union is gone, after its dissolution in 1991, yet why is NATO allowed to remain? And to continue expanding into 15 countries, right up to Russia's border You said: "NATO now serves as a nuclear alliance, which Russia has now proven it's existance and why previous Soviet countries have joined NATO." How has Russia proven its existence? The only country to have launched a nuclear strike against another country is the United States of America back when they bombed Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki. You said: "It's defensive for reasons I've already mentioned, once again do you actually have a reading disability?" What reasons have you given? I've stated that NATO is not a defensive organization, given its involvement in the bombing of Yugoslavia, and its involvement in Afghanistan War and Libyan War. You said: "I'm not gonna defend NATOs bombing of Yugoslavia just as little as i'm gonna defend USA in general, it's a disgrace on NATO." In other words, you're proving my point that NATO is certainly not a defensive organization, yet why are you claiming its something that its not? You said: "The difference here is NATO isn't invading neighbouring countries to force them into NATO, which Russia is." Russia isn't trying to invade any country to force them into NATO, what are you talking about? Russia has stated many times that it wants Ukraine not to join NATO, so isn't this the opposite of what you are claiming?
    1
  21262.  @SwedeenXBL  You said: "Are you acting like you have a reading disability or do you actually have one?" You can't answer the question so you resort to hurling personal insults against me? You've made it clear that you "wouldn't count Hrabove as Ukrainian territory" then why can't you admit that you would consider Crimea as Russian territory? You said: "Yes, you're correct NATO was also formed in response to Soviet military might." But today the Soviet Union is gone, after its dissolution in 1991, yet why is NATO allowed to remain? And to continue expanding into 15 countries, right up to Russia's border.
    1
  21263.  @chunchun-maru  Russia actually continues to supply gas to countries on the unfriendly list. Even some EU countries are receiving Russian gas, despite imposing sanctions on Russia.
    1
  21264.  @solonavi3928  "神州 Shenzhou I'm from Singapore. And I can tell you our main language is English." Yes, but Singapore's national language is Malay though. Are you fluent in your country's national language?
    1
  21265.  @solonavi3928  You said: "And I'm glad Singapore sanction Russia. It's a matter of principal and national interest." What national interest does sanctioning Russia grant Singapore? Singapore is located so far away from Russia, yet because of Singapore's actions, Russia has taken notice of Singapore and added your country to Russia's list of unfriendly countries.
    1
  21266.  @MarkYeung1  Singapore has been governed by the authoritarian single-party PAP for 57 years, much like how China has been governed by the CPC for 73 years. You've praised Singapore's government, but doesn't their government sound remarkably similar to China's?
    1
  21267.  @solonavi3928  According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. Doesn't Singapore's political system sounds remarkably similar to China's?
    1
  21268.  @solonavi3928  You said: "神州 Shenzhou the part that you the official language comprise of all the other languages." When did I ever mention anything about the official language? The national language of Singapore is still Malay (according to the constitution of Singapore), so which part of my post am I mistaken?
    1
  21269.  @solonavi3928  "神州 Shenzhou the president of singapore holds no real power and mostly just ceremonial." Well, what's the whole point of this position then? The fact remains that the President of Singapore was not elected and no votes were cast for Halima Yacob. Yet Singaporeans pay her salary?
    1
  21270.  @solonavi3928  You said: "because she was a woman of colour and singapores aim was to be inclusive. (something China would never do)." What makes you think China will never be inclusive? China has ethnic minorities politicians, such as Nur Bekri, Shohrat Zakir, Ismail Tiliwaldi, who were all Chinese Uighur politicians. You said: "Also it's public knowledge she will be in power for that reason. It was explained to public." No explanation changes the fact that the current President of Singapore is not elected by the people of Singapore. And if the President doesn't hold any power and is merely ceremonial, then why do Singaporeans continue to pay her salary?
    1
  21271.  @solonavi3928  "神州 Shenzhou because my point is nobody cares in Singapore. And I fail to see your point about this national language thing." I've been talking about National Language of Singapore being Malay, but you keep on bringing up the official language and claim that I've mistaken, but you can't even point where I am wrong. According to Singapore's constitution, the national language is Malay. Yet you claim I'm wrong?
    1
  21272.  @solonavi3928  You said: "We have Indian president, malay president, Chinese president. And we pay for their salaries." But you yourself stated that the President of Singapore holds no real power and mostly just ceremonial, then what do you pay their salaries for? And it doesn't change the fact that the current President of Singapore was not elected by the people of Singapore.
    1
  21273.  @solonavi3928  You said: "Does authoritarian China not paying for their dear leader too?" The difference is that Chinese President Jinping has the power to enact change in China and that's why Chinese pay his salary, rather than the President of Singapore of whom you said has no real power and is mostly ceremonial.
    1
  21274.  @solonavi3928  So you can't protest in Singapore? China sees on average around 500 protests every day. In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass protest to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010. (or an average of 493 protests in China every day in 2010)
    1
  21275.  @solonavi3928  "神州 Shenzhou China is inclusive? What role does other people of colour hold? Give me a couple." Shohrat Zakir is an ethnic Uighur politician the former Chairman of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region and the CPC Deputy Committee Secretary of Xinjiang from 2014 to 2021. Since October 2017, he is the member of the CPC's Central Committee. Nur Bekri is an ethnic Uighur politician and was the Chairman of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, between 2008 and 2014. Between 2014 and 2018, he was vice-chairman of the National Development and Reform Commission and Director of the National Energy Administration, with rank equivalent of a minister.
    1
  21276.  @solonavi3928  You said: "China ban celebrities if they have too much influence. Ban children from playing video games." Singapore bans chewing gum.
    1
  21277.  @solonavi3928  You said: "Is this how CCP like to interfere with people that's none of your business?" I mostly pointed out similarities between Singapore's authoritarian political system with that of China's that's all. It's mostly you who are insisting on differences.
    1
  21278.  @solonavi3928  "神州 Shenzhou yes the party we voted elect her so she is an extension of the current ruling party. So we are cool with that" President Xi Jinping was also voted in by the current ruling party in China that the people of China voted for. Elections in China are based on a hierarchical electoral system, whereby local People's Congresses are directly elected. All higher levels of People's Congresses up to the National People's Congress, the national legislature, are indirectly elected by the People's Congress of the level immediately below. Governors, mayors, and heads of counties, districts, townships and towns are in turn elected by the respective local People's Congresses. The President and the State Council are elected by the National People's Congress, which is made up of 2980 people. So China's political system is similar to Singapore's, except that it has more levels.
    1
  21279.  @solonavi3928  You said: "We are democratic enough to purchase US weapons at the very least." You're saying that purchasing US weapons somehow makes your country democratic? Then the Saudi Arabia monarchy is democratic since they bought plenty of US weapons.
    1
  21280.  @solonavi3928  You said: "What you point out is not similarities. What you are doing is nit pickings." I pointed out how Singapore has been governed by the authoritarian single-party PAP for 57 years, much like how China has been governed by the CPC for 73 years. You just claim it's different that's all, now that's nit-picking.
    1
  21281.  @solonavi3928  You said: "Banning celebraties however, is a sign of insecurities. It's a sign of a thin face government who is paranoid of losing power." Actor Ian McKellen (Played Gandalf, Magneto, etc) is technically banned in Singapore because of its laws.
    1
  21282.  @solonavi3928  You said: "Banning celebraties however, is a sign of insecurities. It's a sign of a thin face government who is paranoid of losing power." Actor Ian McKellen (Played Gandalf, Magneto, etc) is technically banned in Singapore because of its laws against homosexuality.
    1
  21283.  @solonavi3928  You said: "unlike Xi Jinping who can rewrite consitute and extend his term indefinite. In fact our president's term is ending. Another difference." There is no limit to the amount of time that somebody can be Prime Minister in Singapore.
    1
  21284.  @solonavi3928  I mean, President Xi Jinping has been in power since 2012, whereas Singapore PM Lee Hsien Loong has been in power even longer, since 2004 for crying out loud. It's apparent that I'm not nit-picking, it's you who are trying to find the smallest difference that's all.
    1
  21285.  @solonavi3928  How can you claim that a country is democratic just because they purchase US weapons? Democracy can be defined as people being in control of their country, but the fact that you purchase US weapons suggests that your own people are not in control (since you cannot go against your weapons supplier). Whereas in China, we manufacture most of our weapons ourselves, isn't that being more democratic (under this definition)?
    1
  21286.  @solonavi3928  You said: "Singapore has do away with Lgbtq law. Making them legal and subject to protection against discrimination. That's progress. Another difference." That's the same as China. Both male and female same-gender sexual activity are legal under Chinese law. How is that a difference?
    1
  21287.  @solonavi3928  You said: "By the way, when I say ban celebraties, I mean local celebrities." Kevin Kwan, author of Crazy Rich Asians, (which inspired the Hollywood hit film of the same title) is wanted in his home country of Singapore for defaulting on his military service.
    1
  21288.  @solonavi3928  "神州 Shenzhou we did. It's not nothing new. We did condemn the Iraq invasion." I'm talking about the Iraq War (2003 to 2011), not the Gulf War. Why didn't Singapore slap sanctions on the bigger countries bullying the smaller countries in Afghan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, Libyan War? And the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia?
    1
  21289.  @solonavi3928  "神州 Shenzhou yes. What's your point? He broke the law." Chinese celebrities in China may also be banned if they broke the law in China. How's this different from Singapore banning celebrities such as Kevin Kwan, author of Crazy Rich Asians?
    1
  21290.  @solonavi3928  Chinese President Xi Jinping has been in power since 2012, whereas Singapore PM Lee Hsien Loong has been in power even longer, since 2004. There is also no term limits for being Prime Minister of Singapore, that's why Lee Hsien Loong has served even longer than Xi Jinping.
    1
  21291.  @solonavi3928  Example: In 2021, the Chinese actor Zheng Shuang was fined nearly 300m RMB ($46m) for tax evasion and banned from being invited on to entertainment programmes. She broke the law in China, much like how Kevin Kwan is banned in Singapore for breaking its laws.
    1
  21292. +kittenclaws The Korean peninsula was split into North Korea (Soviet Union) and South Korea (United States) so since when was the CCP involved in the division of Korea? Is that what they teach you in your Korean history textbooks? That CCP was responsible for the division of Korea?
    1
  21293.  @zackk4969  Then how did China become the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people, if China has a culture of "eating baby?" What's the name of the renowned Chinese writer in Chinese characters?
    1
  21294.  @zackk4969  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"? Video: Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' youtu.be/DPt-zXn05ac
    1
  21295.  @zackk4969  “Diary of a Madman”.《狂人日记》 is a work of fiction by Lu Xun, then why are you confusing fiction with reality?
    1
  21296.  @zackk4393  Synopsis: The story was inspired from a fiction entitled “Diary of a madman” written by Nikolai Gogol in 1834. As the title suggests, the story outlines a diary written by a madman. The allegory was conveyed by a first-person narrator. source:wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Madman%27s_Diary#Synopsis
    1
  21297.  @xixipiisacanine5505  Look at Miami building collapse, the US infrastructure is crumbling.
    1
  21298.  @xixipiisacanine5505  China is home to many of the world's skyscrapers according to the following source: Countries or Jurisdictions Ranked by Number of 150m+ Completed Buildings 1. China (2,395) 2. United States (825) 3. United Arab Emirates (268) 4. Japan (261) 5. South Korea (233) ... Source: Countries or Jurisdictions Ranked by Number of 150m+ Completed Buildings skyscrapercenter.com/countries
    1
  21299. For decades, Interpol failed to catch drugtraffickers in the Philippines. Instead they nabbed the man who managed to catch those drugtraffickers.
    1
  21300. China is often accused by the West of "debt trap" diplomacy towards African countries, yet Chinese loans to African countries comes with lower interest rate (1.5% over 15 – 20 years) than Western loans and also comes with fewer strings attached. At times, China has even forgiven debt to African countries
    1
  21301. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21302.  @MeiinUK  Singapore also uses simplified Chinese characters so what's your problem? Mainland China was suffering from low literacy rate, so why can't China switch to simplified Chinese characters to improve literacy rates?
    1
  21303.  @MeiinUK  Mandarin is NOT Mongolian language, have you tried flying to Mongolia yourself and speaking to the locals in Mandarin and see if they understand you?
    1
  21304.  @MeiinUK  Overseas Chinese do feel ashamed when mainland China was weak and bullied. Now that mainland China is strong, overseas Chinese are starting to feel proud of their Chinese heritage once again. Only people like you are ashamed of mainland China's rise.
    1
  21305. Chinese corporations are controlled by the Chinese government for the benefit of the country. American corporations control the American government for war and profit.
    1
  21306.  @devinfraserashpole4753  China's solar power plant can even produce power at night thanks to molten salt absorbing the Sun's rays during the day and retaining the heat long after the Sun has set, while continuing to produce electricity at night.
    1
  21307.  @PherPhur  Excess electricity generated in one region can also be channeled to other regions of China through high voltage electricity transmission cables. These cables transmit electricity over long distances to consumers far away with minimal transmission loss.
    1
  21308. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilizations still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have long since faded to history. China is even older than Islam, and our culture existed centuries before Christ was even born
    1
  21309. Whatever happened to Hillary Clinton's mysterious emails by the way? Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign, but after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption?
    1
  21310. Agreed, even in public, many people have camera phones and can film anyone. Some cars have dashboard cameras too to record accidents.
    1
  21311.  @Naikomi95  Looks like you're happy for those countries finally gaining recognition by joining BRICS. Russia is the chairman for this coming BRICS summit in Kazan, and it's expected that big changes will be happening in BRICS.
    1
  21312.  @Naikomi95  It's Ukrainian men under 30 who are attempting to flee conscription, and you see them everywhere in Europe, so much such that even Poland is calling for draft dodgers to return there. You don't see that happening in Russia.
    1
  21313.  @Naikomi95  "A country so incompetent the kings of millitary incompetence:" The oblasts of Donetsk, Lughansk, Kherson and Zaporiza recently voted to join the Russian Federation. Same with Crimea in the 2014 referendum, which remains under Russian control today, so how does that demonstrate military incompetence when Russia today still controls those territories?
    1
  21314.  @Naikomi95  "Shenzhou. With kings of military incompetence, I referred to China," How so? The People's Liberation Army was once a small branch of the then Nationalist Kuomintang, yet they survived various attempts by KMT to wipe them out, eventually chasing the KMT to Taiwan island, and today the PLA is the world's largest military.
    1
  21315.  @Naikomi95  "which is just as embarrassing as China loosing to Vietnam" China already made it clear that its objective in 1979 was to punish Vietnam (for their illegal invasion and occupation of Cambodia). And the PLA marched all the way to Vietnam's capital, while the Vietnamese were unable to resist the advance of PLA to Hanoi. Once the path to Hanoi was open, China declared that the punitive mission had been completed and withdrew.
    1
  21316.  @Naikomi95  "Russia can barely hold the area against a country half it size," How is it barely holding when the 4 oblasts of Donetsk, Lughansk, Zaporiza and Kherson are still under Russian control? Not to mention that Crimea oblast remains under Russian control till today. You said: "A fifty cent warrior talks about votes" You're talking about yourself is that it? Because clearly an overwhelming majority of people in the 4 oblasts voted to join Russia. Same with the 2014 Crimean referendum in which 97% of Crimeans voted to join the Russian Federation. It's because Crimea was historically part of Tsarist Russiabefore it was transferred to Ukraine in 1954 to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine joining the Soviet Union.
    1
  21317.  @Naikomi95  "Russia closed the border to Georgia because miluons of people left this way" That was only briefly and it wasn't in the millions. Now tens of thousands of Russian citizens who left the country in 2022 are returning to Russia as they were unwelcomed in countries that they migrated to and denied the right to stay. Also, the returning Russians are boosting Russia's economy.
    1
  21318.  @Naikomi95  US didn't achieve their objectives during the Vietnam War. Whereas the PLA's mission in Vietnam was a punitive operation.
    1
  21319.  @Naikomi95  Vietnam's invasion of Cambodia is illegal under UN charter.
    1
  21320.  @Naikomi95  Again, the PLA's operation in Vietnam was a punitive mission, meaning to punish Vietnam for their invasion of Cambodia. Also, Vietnam eventually left Cambodia, whereas in US's case, South Vietnam eventually fell to North Vietnam.
    1
  21321.  @Naikomi95  Show me which source says that millions of Russians left through Georgia? Also, there are overseas Russians who have returned to Russia. Finion, a Moscow-based relocation firm, confirmed that an estimated 40%-45% of those who left in 2022 have returned to Russia.
    1
  21322.  @Naikomi95  Actually, back then it was Nationalist Kuomintang Generalissmo Chiang kai-shek who was reluctant to fight the Japanese. Even though Imperial Japan had invaded the Chinese province of Manchuria, Chiang (Chiang once served in the Japanese military earlier) and he continued to purge Communists (our own fellow Chinese) instead of repelling the invaders. It had gotten so bad until two of Chiang's subordinates (Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng) had to abduct Chiang and force him to ally with the CPC against the Japanese. This was known as the Xi'an Incident. And it was thanks to communist goodwill when Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release. Only then did Chiang agreed to ally with the CPC against the Japanese.
    1
  21323.  @Naikomi95  Do you not understand the meaning of punitive mission? It's objective is to punish, and the PLA did exactly that, since the Vietnamese were unable to prevent PLA's advance to its capital. Once the PLA reached Hanoi, China declared the path to Hanoi open, and then withdrew. Because Beijing had no plans to occupy Hanoi at that time.
    1
  21324.  @Naikomi95  I've already stated that Vietnam's invasion of Cambodia and overthrowing its government was illegal under UN charter, since the Government of Kampuchea was the internationally recognized government of Kampuchea (i.e Cambodia) at that time. Just like the US invasion of Iraq was illegal and had violated UN charter according to then UN General Secretary Kofi Ahnan
    1
  21325.  @Naikomi95  At least China regained control over the Paracel Islands from Vietnam, and continued to administer them even till today. Whereas the US withdrew from South Vietnam during the Fall of Saigon and left them to the North Vietnamese. Recently, the US also withdrew from Afghanistan after spending trillions of dollars in Afghanistan and spending nearly 20 years, only to abandon their Afghan allies during the Fall of Kabul.
    1
  21326.  @Naikomi95  Mao Zedong is the People's Republic of China's founding father, and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country, where even the previous Nationalist Kuomintang administration did not achieve for 37 years in the Republic of China (1912-1949) earlier. If not for Mao, China today would most likely still be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves instead of the strong and reunified country we are today.
    1
  21327.  @Naikomi95  The Government of Kampuchea was the recognized government of Cambodia, and even the US supported Cambodia's leader. The US voted for the Khmer Rouge and the GOK to retain Cambodia's seat in the UN long after they've been disposed by Vietnam. In fact, the US encouraged China to provide military support to the KR, and since Cambodia was China's ally at that time, China had to response to the Vietnamese illegal invasion of Cambodia.
    1
  21328.  @Naikomi95  Regarding Russia and Georgia, a 2009 report commissioned by the European Union found that Georgia started the war with Russia, when it attacked South Ossetia with heavy artillery in Aug 2008. As for NATO, Ukraine isn't even a member of NATO, yet why is NATO taking sides in this conflict? It shows that NATO is not a defensive organization when they can take actions even without Article 7 being activated.
    1
  21329.  @Naikomi95  China is Cambodia's ally, whereas Ukraine isn't even a member of NATO. Don't you find it strange that NATO is taking punitive actions over a country that's not even a NATO member?
    1
  21330.  @Naikomi95  No it's not. Clearly Ukraine is not a member of NATO.
    1
  21331.  @Naikomi95  Being an "ally to NATO members" is not the same as being an ally of NATO itself. The NATO alliance consists of 32 countries of which Ukraine is NOT a member.
    1
  21332.  @Naikomi95  If you claim they are an ally, then why aren't NATO countries sending their soldiers to help defend Ukraine? In a military alliance, allies are supposed to come to each other's defense.
    1
  21333.  @Naikomi95  Lol, if anyone is crying, it's you since your emojis have tears in their eyes.
    1
  21334.  @bang4buck326  "神州 Shenzhou Dude.... "Panda Express" is not Authentic Chinese Food" I never said it was! Nevertheless, it's a Chinese restaurant as classified by the Chinese American Restaurant Association, just that it isn't authentic.
    1
  21335.  @weizhang2834  So if the owner of a Chinese company become a Singapore citizen, it means that the company belongs Singapore? Then are you saying that just because the CEO of Tik Tok (Douyin) is a Singapore citizen, it means that Tik Tok belongs to Singapore?
    1
  21336.  @weizhang2834  If Chinese companies can switch ownership to foreign countries, then likewise, foreign companies can also switch ownership to Chinese. For example, Swedish car company Volvo is now owned by Chinese company Geely Automobile, yet Volvo is able to sell cars in the United States.
    1
  21337.  @franciscody9622  "神州 Shenzhou Hadilao will not do well in the US." What makes you think so?
    1
  21338.  @item6931  You said: "Companies investing in China are short-sighted and will be destroyed." Why is it short-sighted to invest in China? China has a cheap workforce as well as the world's largest middle income-group, so China presents itself as an attractive market for investment and for setting up shop. China's infrastructure is world class, our ports are among the busiest in the world, loading cargo bound for elsewhere in the world, how is it not a good idea for those companies to invest in China?
    1
  21339.  @michaeldyer6378  "神州 Shenzhou say the wrong thing and your goose is cooked." Shouldn't you respect the rules and laws of the country that you are visiting? I expect Americans to obey Chinese laws while in China at the very least. Just as I expect Chinese to obey American laws while in America.
    1
  21340. Western democracies like Germany, France, USA, etc, have produced such incompetent leaders, many of whom aren't even popular among their own people given their low approvals. Whereas surveys in Russia and China have shown high approvals of President Putin and President Xi among Russians and Chinese respectively.
    1
  21341.  @iknowyoubetter2028  Here's a look inside Chinese BYD mask factory. Video: China: Factory produces 5 million masks a day in bid to supply shortfall youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw?t=17
    1
  21342.  @frankys8779  Sorry, I've just reread your earlier comment and sarcasm doesn't translate well into text it seems. My bad for not getting it the first time.
    1
  21343.  @jaypeeazkal9750  This factory in the eastern Chinese city of Rizhao (日照) has been busy pumping out 3,000,000 masks a day. Video: Inside China's Biggest Mask Factory youtu.be/Gc074FxOBA4?t=11
    1
  21344. Technological innovation has enabled a company in Guangdong to produce 1,000 face masks in one minute. Video: Ultra-high-speed Mask Production Line Put into Use in south China City youtube.com/watch?v=_jWt-4YKBq4
    1
  21345. It's the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of the West being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so thoroughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China surpassing the U.S someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    1
  21346. The Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) is fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today.
    1
  21347. Sinophobic sentiment in the West is being fueled by the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of the West being overrun with Asians).
    1
  21348. Anti-China sentiment is being fueled in the West by the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians) and the Red Scare (fear of communism) mindset.
    1
  21349. It's the Red Scare and Yellow Peril mindset at work in the West.
    1
  21350.  @honeybear9376  I agree with that guy's sentiment. There are also many people who hate China, but claim that they like Chinese food.
    1
  21351.  @salymerry3932  Why should rural Chinese houses have a lawn around the house like Western houses? Or have dairy products like milk and cheese? You are imposing Western culture and aesthetics onto China here?
    1
  21352.  @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane  You said: "So Taiwan legally is still under USMC control." The United States Taiwan Defense Command (USTDC) 美軍協防台灣司令部 originally stationed in Taiwan has since departed from the island. The Command held its final flag retreat ceremony during the afternoon of 26 April 1979. Rear Admiral James B. Linder was the last USTDC commander to depart Taiwan on 28 April 1979, and the last U.S. soldier left Taiwan on 3 May 1979. The former site of the USTDC headquarters became the Taipei Fine Arts Museum in 1983. Source: United States Taiwan Defense Command wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Taiwan_Defense_Command
    1
  21353.  @rogerdodger8415  The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Source: Seventeen Point Agreement wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. China doesn't claim the SEA itself only the Islands in South China Sea. Even Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of all the territory Taiwan claims (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Taiwan also claims the South China Sea Islands as part of their territory, they published an 11-Dash Line in 1947 (which the 9-Dash Line is based) The British took Hong Kong from China and did not fully returned it back. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  21354.  @SakakiDash  Even Indian PM Narendra Modi publicly stated that "Chinese troops did not enter Indian territory and no posts were taken." Does this imply that it was actually Indian troops that intruded into the Chinese border then? Source: ‘China did not enter our territory, no posts taken’: PM at all-party meet on Ladakh clash hindustantimes.com/india-news/chinese-troops-did-not-enter-our-territory-says-pm-modi-at-all-party-meeting-on-ladakh-standoff/story-QGgGUyL3sVRYB7mp3Y8bBI.html Taiwan is part of China, but it's a rogue province that's all. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory. Taiwan even claims territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of all the territory Taiwan claims for itself (wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg )
    1
  21355.  @rogerdodger8415  Like I asked earlier, what "International Court" or "UN Tribunal" it "Hague Tribunal" are you talking about? The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is not a UN-agency it only shares the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice (ICJ), but the two of organisations are unrelated. Since the South China Sea arbitration was by a non-UN agency, then China reserves the right not to adhere to its arbitration.
    1
  21356.  @rogerdodger8415  So in democratic countries, the average man tells the government what they want and what they demand, but in the end, nothing actually changes. Look at former President Trump and he didn't build a wall at the US border with Mexico like he promised. In USA, you can change the leaders, but you can't change the policies. Whereas in China, you can't change the leaders, but the policies are constantly changing, so what do you mean when you claim there is no change in China? You said: "Forcing people to accept your broken and repressive system." Granted China's political system isn't perfect, but it has done an excellent job transforming China from a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy today, the world's factory (Made-in-China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. So why should China abandon a political system that works for us and adopt Western brand of democracy? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. The "tribunal" is not even a UN-agency, unlike the International Court of Justice, so China reserves the right not to adhere to it's ruling. Even according to U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), China made a declaration in 2006 in accordance with Article 298 of Section 3 of Part XV of the Convention to not accept compulsory third party arbitration with regards to issues pertaining to sovereignty. Many countries including the United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, France, Canada, and Spain had made similar declarations to reject any of the procedures provided for in sections 2 of Part XV of the convention with respect to the different categories of disputes.
    1
  21357.  @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane  Japan is bound by WWII surrender treaty (Article 9 of the Japanese constitution) to never declare war against another country except in self-defence, so if conflict breaks out between Taiwan and the mainland, it would be illegal for Japan to join in, because it would mean going against their own pacifist constitution.
    1
  21358.  @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane  About Chinese fighters flying over Chinese airspace in Taiwan province, how would that make Australia afraid of possible invasion by China? Australia recognises Taiwan as part of China, under the 1972 Shanghai Communiqué The Australian Government recognises the Government of the People's Republic of China as the sole legal Government of China, acknowledges the position of the Chinese Government that Taiwan is a province of the People's Republic of China. …… Source:pmtranscripts.pmc.gov.au/release/transcript-3119 So why would Australia be alarmed at Chinese fighters flying over Chinese airspace in Taiwan province?
    1
  21359.  @rogerdodger8415  Once again, the "international court" that made the ruling over South China Sea, is the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), which is Not a UN-agency, it only shares the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) of which the latter is an official UN agency. So since the tribunal ruling was made by non-Official UN agency, then China reserves the right not to adhere to it's decision. The PCA doesn't have the same judicial powers as the ICJ, the two organizations are unrelated. Source: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1989486/united-nations-stresses-separation-hague-tribunal Second, you bring up the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) but China ratifies UNCLOS (even till today), but the United States doesn't even ratify UNCLOS, yet they are claiming Freedom of Navigation operations in South China Sea in the name of UNCLOS?
    1
  21360.  @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane  "神州 Shenzhou Their pacifist constitution is bul**hit and everyone knows it. " New generations of Japanese are pacifist and students are demonstrating against a bill to alter Japan’s pacifist constitution. Source: New generation of Japanese anti-war protesters challenge Abe theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/16/japanese-anti-war-protesters-challenge-shinzo-abe You said: "Japan will do whatever the USA tells it to do." Australia will also do whatever the USA tells its to do, Australia is literally the "US Deputy Sheriff" in Asia, and is following the US anti-China stance.
    1
  21361.  @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Because any attack by China on Taiwan will lead to war. Any war will involve the USA," When Russia had military intervention in Crimea and annexed it from Ukraine in 2014, all Washington did was slap sanctions on Moscow that's all. No US-Russia war over the annexation of Crimea. So what makes you think USA would go to war with mainland China over Taiwan?
    1
  21362.  @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane  "神州 Shenzhou Nobody actually recognizes Taiwan as part of the PRC." I gave you the words from 1971 Shanghai Communiqué signed by Australia, showing that they recognize Taiwan as part of China. Here's words from Australia Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade: Australia’s Joint Communiqué with the PRC recognised the Government of the PRC as China’s sole legal government, and acknowledged the position of the PRC that Taiwan was a province of the PRC. ... Source:dfat.gov.au/geo/taiwan/australia-taiwan-relationship
    1
  21363.  @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane  "The reeducation is what you will get if the PRC attacks the ROC." If such a conflict were to erupt, it would simply be the continuation of the previously unfinished Chinese Civil War. It would be an internal civil war within China, and if USA participates, it would be interfering in an internal civil war inside China, since USA recognise Taiwan as part of China under the 1972 Shanghai Communiqué
    1
  21364.  @rogerdodger8415  Since 22 January 2013 when the Philippines unilaterally initiated arbitration with respect to certain issues in the South China Sea (“Arbitration”), China has maintained its solemn position that it would neither accept nor participate in the Arbitration, having stated that the tribunal constituted at the unilateral request of the Philippines (“Arbitral Tribunal” or “Tribunal”) manifestly has no jurisdiction. Source: The Tribunal’s Award in the “South China Sea Arbitration” Initiated by the Philippines Is Null and Void csil.cn/News/Detail.aspx?AId=201 So what makes you claim China agreed to go before the court?
    1
  21365.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou BUT THEY DID PARTICIPATE!! Their claim WAS HEARD BY THE COURT!!" China has refused to take part in the case. Source:reuters.com/article/southchinasea-china-usa-idUSL3N1043AM20150724
    1
  21366.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou THE WHOLE WORLD KNOWS THAT CHINA'S CLAIMS BEFORE THE COURT WERE SO LAUGHABLE" It was reported that 66-70 countries support China's stance (marked in RED) on the South China Seas, compared to 5-7 countries that support the Philippines stance (marked in BLUE) in this map (source:thediplomat.com/2016/07/who-supports-china-in-the-south-china-sea-and-why/ )
    1
  21367.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou When China FIRST prepares a paper outlining ITS POSITION and claims in the case, it has entered ITS CLAIM before the court." But China's paper clearly outlines it's position: no acceptance, no participation, no recognition, and no implementation. The hearing in the PCA may continue, but since China is not a participant to PCA, then China is not legally bound to uphold the results of the arbitration. Yes, you have admitted that the PCA is not a United Nations agency, therefore, you can't claim it's a "UN tribunal" or "International Court" it only happens to share the same office space in the Hague as the ICJ, but the two organizations are different. The ICJ is an official UN agency, whereas the PCA isn't.
    1
  21368.  @rogerdodger8415  "Read the white paper, yourself WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY REJECTED BY THE COURT" China's white paper clearly states: 5. China and the Philippines have not yet had any negotiation designed to settle their relevant disputes in the South China Sea...The two countries have also made solemn commitment to settling relevant disputes through negotiation and consultation in the 2002 Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC) that China and the ASEAN Member States jointly signed. (Yet Philippines just unilaterally choose to take China to court in 6) 6. In January 2013, the then government of the Republic of the Philippines turned its back on the above-mentioned consensus and commitment, and unilaterally initiated the South China Sea arbitration... So Philippines violated it's 2002 Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea, by choosing to settle the dispute through third party arbitration, instead bilateral negotiation and consultation.
    1
  21369.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: 神州 Shenzhou So.. what you are saying is that if the police charge you with a crime, and you are asked to come and explain, should you NOT PARTICIPATE then it means you are innocent? This is not a crime, it's a territorial dispute between 2 countries, and Philippines just unilaterally choose to go to court, even without informing China of its intent to do so. Philippines had agreed under the 2002 Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea to solve disputes through negotiation and consultation, but choose to involve third party arbitration instead. Furthermore, China made a declaration in 2006 in accordance with Article 298 of Section 3 of Part XV of the Convention to not to accept compulsory third party arbitration. Many countries including the United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, France, Canada, and Spain had made similar declarations, so China is well within our rights not to adhere to the PCA ruling.
    1
  21370.  @rogerdodger8415  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  21371.  @rogerdodger8415  The Four Elements as outlined in China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs are: 1. The sovereignty of the territories concerned belongs to China. 2. When conditions are not ripe to bring about a thorough solution to territorial dispute, discussion on the issue of sovereignty may be postponed so that the dispute is set aside. To set aside dispute does not mean giving up sovereignty. It is just to leave the dispute aside for the time being. 3. The territories under dispute may be developed in a joint way. 4. The purpose of joint development is to enhance mutual understanding through cooperation and create conditions for the eventual resolution of territorial ownership. What is meant by the 1st element is that China is in a most authoritative position to address the issue of the Nansha Islands since they have always been a part of China's territory as shown in numerous evidences. The maps of the world in many countries also prove this. Source:fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/ziliao_665539/3602_665543/3604_665547/t18023.shtml The 2nd, 3rd and 4th element also demonstrate China's willingness to postpone discussions if they aren't ripe, but to set aside dispute does not mean giving up sovereignty. It is just to leave the dispute aside for the time being.
    1
  21372.  @rogerdodger8415  Did you know that the 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and a traitor to his people? The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government (Beijing). Declassified CIA files have exposed that a total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) Source: CIA Tibetan program wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Costs So here we have concrete evidence that the 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the USA to engage in separatist activities against the Central People's Government. How can a so-called "spiritual" leader collude with the CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government?
    1
  21373.  @rogerdodger8415  China is NOT France, just like France is NOT China. The nuclear plant is co-owned like you said by both Chinese and French company, and like you said, the decision is ultimately up the plant's Chinese operator. Since your source says that it's not an emergency, then it's just your overactive imagination that's all, when it appears that China clearly has the nuclear plant under control. In fact, since you brought up "long history of nuclear leaks" here's a List of nuclear power accidents by country (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_power_accidents_by_country ) and China doesn't even have an entry in it.
    1
  21374.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "Why does All your links come ONLY from communist country?" Didn't I post a Reuters article earlier? Anyway, here's Foreign Policy on Why China Says No to the Arbitration on the South China Sea Source:foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/10/why-china-says-no-to-the-arbitration-on-the-south-china-sea/ There is solid international legal basis for China to oppose this case. And by doing so, China is not only safeguarding its national interests, but also protecting the integrity and legitimacy of the international maritime order. Because China, as a sovereign state, is entitled to choose its preferred means of dispute resolution — a legitimate right under international law. Moreover, the Philippines’ case is inherently flawed and illegitimated by such irregularities as the country’s abuse of the dispute settlement procedures, its distortion of concepts, and its deliberate disguise of the real nature of the disputes. The Philippines’ arbitration relates to the dispute over the sovereignty of islands and reefs in the South China Sea, and to maritime delimitation. But these territorial issues are not regulated by — and therefore beyond the scope of — the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). And in 2006, China declared it would exclude “disputes concerning maritime delimitation” from compulsory arbitration, under Article 298 of UNCLOS. Second, the Philippines’ unilateral initiation of compulsory arbitration did not meet UNCLOS preconditions for such initiation. The “no arbitration without the existence of a dispute” principle requires that before resorting to compulsory arbitration, there must have existed a real dispute between the parties. UNCLOS also stipulates that the Philippines must exchange views related to the arbitration over the dispute with China. But the Philippines has never consulted with China on the subject matters of the arbitration.... In fact, it was China that tried in vain to engage in meaningful dialogue with the Philippines.
    1
  21375.  @rogerdodger8415  Chernobyl is in Russia, what's that even got to do with China? I literally gave you a List of nuclear power accidents by country (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_power_accidents_by_country ) and China doesn't even have an entry in it, so why are you going on and on about nuclear leaks in China?
    1
  21376.  @rogerdodger8415  China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/j3J196bLP5E
    1
  21377.  @rogerdodger8415  Where does the Treaty of Manila of 1946 show that Spratly Islands belongs to the Philippines? I already shown that the Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence in 1946 that the Spratlys was not Philippine territory, because the Spratlys were not part of the Philippines per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America. The Philippines gained independence in 1946, but when nationalists within the Philippine government wanted to claim the Spratlys, their American advisors discouraged them. The Spanish-American treaty of 1898 made it clear that the western limit of the Philippine islands did not include the Spratlys, Source: Page 11 War Or Peace in the South China Sea? by Timo Kivimäki, https://books.google.com/books?id=CNVf9R_L5FAC&pg=PA11&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false …… You said: "What treaty allows you to invade Tibet?" The Tibetans themselves signed the _Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet_(中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Source: Seventeen Point Agreement wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Didn't I mention this earlier? …… You said: "What treaty allows you to threaten Taiwan?" Go and read Taiwan's own constitution and they claim all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of all the territory Taiwan claims for itself (Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) …… You said: "Hey do me a favor.. You said the Dali lahma was a CIA SPY??" Where did I ever said that the 14th Dalai Lama was a CIA SPY? Could you please quote me my words saying that Dalai Lama is spying for the CIA?
    1
  21378.  @rogerdodger8415  So Scarborough Shoal is named after a British merchant ship, so it's property of Britain is that what you are saying? Your source also says: "In 2013, the Philippines solely filed an international case against China in the UN-backed court in The Hague, Netherlands. In 2016, the court declared that China's so-called nine-dash line claim in the entire South China Sea was invalid,[6] while upholding the sovereign rights of the Philippines in the area.[10] China rejected the UN-backed international court's decision, sending more warships in Scarborough Shoal and the Spratly Islands." But both agreed that the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) that conducted the Arbitration is not an official UN agency merely shares the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) but the two organisations are unrelated. Yet it refuses to even name the court, and claims that it was UN backed when it isn't?
    1
  21379.  @rogerdodger8415  China has settled boundary dispute approximately of 20,000 km with 12 countries out of the 22,000 km and is yet to settle about 2,000 km of boundary involving India and Bhutan. -In 1961, Nepal and China signed border agreement. -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1991, USSR and China signed Sino-Soviet border agreement. -In 1992, Laos and China signed border agreement. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border agreement. -In 2011, Tajikistan ratified a 1999 deal to cede 1,000 km2 of land to China and China also cede over 28,000 km2 of Tajikistani territory. China has 21 talks with Bhutan and 19 talks with India but still fail to settle our countries borders. …… You said: "In the Philippines, China still claims portions of the Spratly islands despite the International Court of Justice (ICJ) dismissing Chinese claims." When did the ICJ dismissed Chinese claims? We both agreed that the Permanent Court of Arbitration is not an official UN agency it only shares the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice, but the two organisations are unrelated.
    1
  21380.  @rogerdodger8415  This factory in the eastern Chinese city of Rizhao (日照) has been busy pumping out 3,000,000 masks a day. Video: Inside China's Biggest Mask Factory youtu.be/Gc074FxOBA4?t=11 Where do you think your country's PPE comes from if not China?
    1
  21381.  @rogerdodger8415  Dr Peter Forster, a geneticist Cambridge University has identified 3 Covid-19 strains (A, B, C) Type-A is believed to have leaped from bats to humans (animal-to-human transmission) and Type-B is mutated from Type-A and found predominantly in China while Type-C is mutated from Type-B and found predominantly outside China, in places like Singapore. Video: No proof that Covid-19 originated in Wuhan: Peter Forster youtu.be/AQQf2yoymu0 The interesting thing is that the Europe and America suffer predominantly from Type-A virus (animal-to-human transmission) and Type-A is predominantly found outside East Asia, in Europeans and Americans.
    1
  21382.  @rogerdodger8415  Traces of Covid-19 have been found in Barcelona sewers in Spain since March 2019, before the outbreak in Wuhan even began. Source: Coronavirus traces found in March 2019 sewage sample, Spanish study shows reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-spain-science-idUSKBN23X2HQ Spanish virologists have found traces of the novel coronavirus in a sample of Barcelona waste water collected in March 2019, nine months before the COVID-19 disease was identified in China, the University of Barcelona said.
    1
  21383.  @rogerdodger8415  Chairman Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    1
  21384.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "In fact AS WE KNOW, the communist party refuses ANY investigation from world scientists." The WHO investigation team arrived in Wuhan on mid-January 2021 so who says that the Communist Party of China refused entry to WHO investigation team? Source: WHO team arrives in Wuhan to investigate pandemic origins msn.com/en-us/news/world/who-team-arrives-in-wuhan-to-investigate-pandemic-origins/ar-BB1cJN5d
    1
  21385.  @rogerdodger8415  You said Dr. Li-Meng Yan was silenced when she sounded the alarm about human-to-human transmission in December but how? She was approached by a scientist friend at the Centers for Disease Control in China on Dec. 31 who warned her about human-to-human transmission, but that wasn't a confirmation of human-to-human transmission. China only confirmed human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus on 20th January 2020 and Wuhan was locked down shortly after this announcement. Source: China confirms human-to-human transmission of coronavirus (Dated to 20th January 2020) theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/20/coronavirus-spreads-to-beijing-as-china-confirms-new-cases?
    1
  21386.  @rogerdodger8415  So why don't WHO investigate this other lead in Spain since the investigations in Wuhan turned out inconclusive? Not just Spain, even researchers found out that Covid19 was possibly circulating in Italy since September 2019, earlier than previously thought. Source: Researchers find coronavirus was circulating in Italy earlier than thought reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-italy-timing-idUSKBN27W1J2
    1
  21387.  @rogerdodger8415  About the Great Chinese Famine, in July 1958, the Yellow River flooded that that coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. In July 1958, the peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 m3/s (790,000 cu ft/s) with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kg/m3 (57 lb/cu ft), 14× and 24× their mean annual values, respectively. The flood water level was so high that it rose up to the top of the levee in several places. Source: 1958 Yellow River flood wikipedia.org/wiki/1958_Yellow_River_flood This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. It was reported as the most severe flood since 1933.
    1
  21388.  @rogerdodger8415  You literally admitted that China allowed WHO investigation team into Wuhan in January 2020, they concluded that the virus probably jumped naturally from an animal, determined that a market linked to early cases was not necessarily the source, and all but dismissed the possibility of a lab leak. So why did you claim China refuse to allow WHO investigation team into China when China clearly allowed it? Since the leads in China have turned up inconclusive about Covid19 origins, then why not WHO investigate other leads such as Spain or Italy or possibly even US' Fort Detrick? If the USA was truly uninvolved, then a WHO investigation into Fort Detrick would help put rumors to rest, dispel hearsay and prove the US innocence. Unless of course the USA has something to hide in Fort Detrick.
    1
  21389.  @rogerdodger8415  Explain how Dr. Li Meng-Yan is the proof that you need. According to you, she was approached by a scientist friend at the Centers for Disease Control in China on Dec. 31 who warned her about human-to-human transmission, which she flagged with her boss, who just nodded. According to you, that's just a warning about the possibility of human-to-human transmission of Covid19 that's all, that's not proof of confirmation of human-to-human transmission. China confirmed human-to-human transmission of Covid19 on 20th Jan 2020, and Wuhan was locked down shortly after this announcement. Source: China confirms human-to-human transmission of Sars-like virus (Dated to 20th January 2020) ft.com/content/15e474cc-3b2a-11ea-a01a-bae547046735
    1
  21390.  @rogerdodger8415  The video you linked is a private video.
    1
  21391.  @rogerdodger8415  How can the Chinese Communists make a YouTube video private? And the video you showed is a flood in Zhengzhou, but how's the Communist Party of China to blame for bad weather conditions in Zhengzhou?
    1
  21392.  @rogerdodger8415  There is the Great Firewall of China yes, but once you bypassed it, you can access YouTube freely, so how did the Communists make a YouTube video Private? Google left China because they lost out to their Chinese competitor Baidu. According to Forbes, Google's market share climbed from 15% (mid-2006) to 31% (2010), but Baidu's market share soared from 47% (mid-2006) to 64% (2010) which is a significant lead. Source: Forbes:Why Google Is Quitting China_ forbes.com/2010/01/15/baidu-china-search-intelligent-technology-google.html? Baidu also introduced community-oriented services that appealed to Chinese Internet users, including bulletin boards where leads on information could be exchanged--a service that Google dismissed as having nothing to do with search. Baidu also offered instant messaging, a hit with China's Netizens. Plus, Baidu was first to the market with mobile search and information offered up in multimedia, including video clips. Baidu also set up a national network of advertising resellers in 200 Chinese cities to educate businesses about the power of online advertising--a step that Google did not take. Baidu's search feature for music also proved highly popular. One other key factor put Baidu in the lead: Its search technology was considered superior to Google's in the Mandarin language. It was because of Baidu's innovation that's why Google eventually packed up and left China, after failing to capture a significant portion of China's market share.
    1
  21393.  @rogerdodger8415  "The dam operation was carried out late Tuesday night in the city of Luoyang, just as severe flooding overwhelmed the Henan provincial capital of Zhengzhou," So the Dam operation was carried out in Luoyang, but it was another city, Zhengzhou that was hit by severe flooding from severe rainfall, so how is the Communist Party of China responsible for flooding in Zhengzhou?
    1
  21394.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou Did you read it? They blew up a dam. The water flooded entire towns downstream." Read what? You didn't linked any article, all you said was a dam operation in the city of Luoyang, whereas it was another city, Zhengzhou whom was hit by severe floods from heavy rainfall, how's the Communist Party of China to blame for bad weather conditions in Henan province? You said: "The same thing happened with your miraculous Three Gorges Dam, which was a catastrophe!! The had to open the gates and it caused massive flooding downstream." Chongqing was flooded but that was before Three Gorges Dam released waters. And Three Gorges Dam is located far away from Chongqing, so what are you talking about?
    1
  21395.  @rogerdodger8415  I literally quoted Forbes article, showing that although Google's market share climbed from 15% in mid-2006 to 31% in 2010, it's Chinese rival Baidu has only increased its market share, going from 47% in mid-2006 to 64% in 2010, which is a significant lead, that's why Google left China after being unable to capture a significant portion of China's market. You claim Google left China because of an alleged "sophisticated cyber attack" reportedly backed by Beijing, but a company doesn't have to be in China to be the target of cyber attacks, so how does that explain Google leaving China because of alleged cyber attack?
    1
  21396.  @rogerdodger8415  A) Who invented Paper if not China? B) Who invented Compass if not China? C) Who invented Gunpowder if not China? D) Where did Americans learn how to make paper and printing, which are clearly Chinese inventions E) Americans make use of Chinese inventions like gunpowder, paper, compass, but do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions? F) The 14th Dalai Lama sold out to the Americans and accepted CIA funding in training Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against Beijing. G) China has landed our lunar rover ON THE FAR SIDE OF THE MOON, a feat in which no other country has matched. H) China has the largest automobile industry in the world and Chinese automobile brands like SAIC Motor, Dongfeng, FAW and Chang'an are popular. I) Chinese Aircraft Carrier Liaoning was purchased from Ukraine and been upgraded and retrofitted for blue water service. J) China's J-20 Stealth Fighter is one of 5 operationally ready stealth fighters available today. K) America has a quarter the population size of China. L) China has allowed a PROPER WHO Team investigation into Wuhan, and their report on the Covid19 origins was inconclusive, and they dismissed the lab leak theory as "highly improbable". M) What's the name of that Chinese Virologist that worked at Wuhan, who testified that the virus came from the lab? N) Where is Ladack? O) How many fish are there in the South China Sea, for you to claim China stole all of them? P) Yes, "Ghost cities" are like USA under lockdown Q) Influenza is an endemic disease, how is Chinese bird handler responsible for that? R) Westerners been building coal plants since 200-300 years ago back when the Industrial Revolution started in 1700-1800, whereas China only industrialized some 40 years ago. S) Who do you think creates the law, the People or the Government? If you answered the People, then which law did the People create and why do People still need the Government? T) China's greatest advancements come from the blood, toil, tears and sacrifice of the Chinese people and our government, to transform China from a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into an economic juggernaut today, and the factory of the world. U) China no longer a currency manipulator, U.S. Treasury says marketwatch.com/story/china-no-longer-a-currency-manipulator-us-treasury-says-2020-01-13 V) Foreign News sources are still accessible in China through VPN, and nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China. W) China is currently at peace and not at war with any country. Our People's Liberation Army hasn't fought an actual war since our last major conflict in 1979. The USA however, fought in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, Pakistan War, and numerous other wars in the Middle East. X) Hey, even the BBC is funded principally by an annual television licence fee which is set by the British Government, agreed by Parliament. So the British government controls the purse strings to BBC. Y) China Pledges To Uphold Phase One Trade Deal That Includes $200 Billion Purchase Of U.S. Goods forbes.com/sites/sergeiklebnikov/2020/05/22/china-pledges-to-uphold-phase-one-trade-deal-that-includes-200-billion-purchase-of-us-goods/ Z) China has 4x the population of America, so it's much easier to form a Chinatown in America than it is for an America town in China. Because USA just doesn't have the necessary numbers.
    1
  21397.  @rogerdodger8415  The floods across China are a result of bad weather conditions from heavy monsoon rains, so how is the Communist Party of China responsible for bad weather? Even the dam operations you said were in Luoyang, whereas floods were in another city Zhengzhou so again, how is the CPC to blame for bad weather causing floods? I mean, explain why would the CPC open floodwaters and kill our own people, destroy our economy, destroy houses, property, just to achieve what purpose? What benefit does killing our own people do for the CPC, you tell me?
    1
  21398.  obimk1  How do you rob fish? Point a gun at them and force them to fork out money? And what are these "militarized trawlers" are you talking about?
    1
  21399.  @rogerdodger8415  Because Chinese inventions are so useful that they're still in use even today after thousands of years. Ancient Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions?
    1
  21400.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou Are you paying attention? The Ancient Greek did more for mankind and technology than the Chinese did in their entire history! Where would you be without the wheel? The telescope?" The Greeks did not invent the wheel. On the other hand, the cogwheel was invented in China. Early examples of gears date from the 4th century BC in China (Zhan Guo times – Late East Zhou dynasty), which have been preserved at the Luoyang Museum of Henan Province. As for telescopes, Chinese astronomers have been observing the heavens and recording supernovae such as the one that created the Crab Nebula (now known as SN 1054) that was observed in China and not in other countries. The Ancient Chinese people have identified stars from 1300BCE, as Chinese star names later categorized in the twenty-eight mansions have been found on oracle bones unearthed at Anyang, dating back to the mid-Shang Dynasty. You said: "The artificial heart?" The first artificial heart was made by the Soviet scientist Vladimir Demikhov in 1937, so isn't that a Communist invention? You said: "Satellites," The Soviet Union invented and launched the world's first artificial satellite, Sputnik-1 on October 4, 1957. Video: The Sputnik 1 Launch: The First Artificial Satellite To Enter Earth's Orbit | Mach | NBC News youtu.be/g2WaJdflqT0 On October 4, 1957, the Soviet Union sent the beach ball-sized satellite, Sputnik 1 into space. The launch grabbed the world’s attention because it was at the height of the Cold War. So isn't the Satellite a communist invention under the Soviet Union?
    1
  21401.  @rogerdodger8415  You've just admitted that the Communists invented the world's first artifical heart, then why are you looking down on communist inventions? Besides Sputnik-1, the Soviet Union also invented the spacesuit and the first man in space was Soviet Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, on April 12, 1961. Video: Yuri Gagarin Became The First Human In Space, 57 Years Ago Today | Mach | NBC News youtu.be/vkVAqNbX0Nw On April 12, 1961, Soviet cosmonaut, Yuri Gagarin, made history at the age of 27 by completing a single orbit of Earth in approximately 108 minutes. After more than 50 years, Gagarin’s journey is still regarded as a key moment in space history that paved the way for all future space endeavors that followed._
    1
  21402.  @rogerdodger8415  The Greeks didn't invent the wheel, even the cogwheel was actually invented in China. The world's oldest gears date from the 4th century BC in China (Zhan Guo times – Late East Zhou dynasty), which have been preserved at the Luoyang Museum of Henan Province, China.
    1
  21403.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Have you ever heard of the Archimedes screw?" Most Chinese carpenters joined wood without the use of nails or screws, through mortise and tenon joinery. Video: Interlocking Chinese Joinery with Andrew Hunter youtu.be/aD6qdJNU7GE
    1
  21404.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "Quick, name the top Mathematicians of all time.. How many are Chinese?" Take the Pythagorean theorem for example and it was in use over a thousand years before Pythagoras was even born. With contents known much earlier, but in surviving texts dating from roughly the 1st century BC, the Chinese text Zhoubi Suanjing 《周髀算经》_(The Arithmetical Classic of the Gnomon and the Circular Paths of Heaven)_ gives a reasoning for the Pythagorean theorem for the (3, 4, 5) triangle—in China it is called the "Gougu theorem" (勾股定理). During the Han Dynasty (202 BC to 220 AD), Pythagorean triples appear in The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art, together with a mention of right triangles. Some believe the theorem arose first in China, where it is alternatively known as the "Shang Gao theorem" (商高定理), named after the Duke of Zhou's astronomer and mathematician, whose reasoning composed most of what was in the Zhoubi Suanjing.
    1
  21405.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou First? In a race, does the glory go to who was first to start, or FIRST TO FINISH? The USA is clearly the winner in all modern technology," If this is your reasoning, then the race is always ongoing even till today. And it's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set and many economists firmly believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's economy sometime in the foreseeable future. So how can you proclaim a winner at the finish line when the race is still ongoing? You said: "Xi stopped all transportation out of Wuhan, EXCEPT for international travel" Except for chartered flights, no international passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since its lockdown on January 23, People’s Daily learned exclusively from the Hubei Airport Group Company. Source: No international commercial passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since lockdown: Airport authority
    1
  21406.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou Yes, it's lock down AFTER the virus was released in September, as new evidence indicates in report just released." Who said the virus was even released in September? The World Health Organization investigation team visited Wuhan and investigated Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market and the Wuhan Institute of Virology and they discovered the wet market wasn't the place of origin, and they dismissed the lab leak theory as "highly unlikely". Then where did you get your report from?
    1
  21407.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "When China is stronger than USA.. talk then. Until that time, it's wishful thinking" Britain was colonial superpower during 19th century but was eventually overtaken by USA in 20th century. But prior to that, China (and also India) had been economic superpower for 1800 years and we made up 25% of the world's GDP share, according to world leading British economist, Angus Maddison. Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA_Middle_East.png And judging from the above trend, it looks as though China is all set to dominate the 21st century.
    1
  21408.  @rogerdodger8415  So what makes you think these 4 economists are somehow correct? According a report by UK-based Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR), China will overtake the US to become the world's largest economy by 2028, five years earlier than previously forecast. CEBR also said China's "skilful" management of Covid-19 would boost its relative growth compared to the US and Europe in coming years. Source: BBC: Chinese economy to overtake US 'by 2028'
    1
  21409.  @rogerdodger8415  After 9/11 bombing, the USA under former President Bush literally invaded Iraq on suspicion of harboring Weapons of Mass Destruction, yet no WMDs were found in Iraq so isn't USA the perfect analogy of "once a lie, makes you a liar"? You literally can't find any proof, you just quoted a report out of thin air, when the WHO team that investigated Wuhan gave a report saying Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market is not where Covid19 originated and they dismissed the lab leak theory as "highly improbable".
    1
  21410.  @rogerdodger8415  Japan is bound by WWII surrender treaty (Article 9 of the Japanese constitution) to never declare war against another country, except for in self-defense, so how is Japan going to attack China with it's pacifist constitution? And Russia supports any country that opposes the USA, why would Russia even join the USA in a potential military conflict against China?
    1
  21411.  @rogerdodger8415  The one main takeaway of your statement is "China's GDP will overtake that of the US sooner or later." so you are talking about an inevitability. It might be sooner or later, but it is a certainty. Other takeaways include "This is the trend of the era. It will affect people's mind-set when considering which year will be the tipping point. " Also: "No matter whether this tipping point comes or not, China has the ability to safeguard its national security, resist US coercion calmly, and will insist on walking its own path."
    1
  21412.  @rogerdodger8415  A few years ago, HSBC predicted that China's GDP could surpass that of the US in as early as 2025. But with China's economic growth slowing down, people's expectations changed This line is superseded by the statement: "China's GDP will overtake that of the US sooner or later."
    1
  21413.  @rogerdodger8415  A) What lie? I've shown that USA lied about WMDs in Iraq, so who is the real liar here? B) 4 economists with a report against EU and Japanese economists believing that China's economy will eventually surpass the United States someday in the foreseeable future? C) As far as I know, it is not yet the year 2025 so how is the report wildy inaccurate? E) Why would the farmers and students do that? The CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why would Chinese people overthrow our government? F) Shame and humiliation for whom? The USA? When China eventually surpasses it in the foreseeable future? It is apparent that you don't care about China's interests, you just can't stand to see China succeed that's all. Since the 19th century, Westerners have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-liberal democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many Westerners to fathom.
    1
  21414.  @rogerdodger8415  Taiwan is not part of Japan, so how would the term self-defence even apply? Japan would be violating its own constitution if it joins in a hypothetical war between Taiwan and the mainland. About China's leadership, China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US short term leadership.
    1
  21415.  @rogerdodger8415  For what reason would China even attack Japan? Mainland China claims Taiwan, but not Japan, so how would Japan be next after Taiwan? And the fact remains that if Japan ever attacked the another country outside of self-defence, then they would be violating their own constitution. The Americans can remove a President that they don't like yes, but oftentimes the next US President will be just as incompetent (if not worst). The two political parties (i.e. The Republicans and the Democrats) rather fight among themselves than fight for America's future. Each side takes the credit for America's success, while pushing the blame for America's failures on the other side, and they certainly do not learn from previous mistakes. Whereas in China, there is only one party, so the communist party gets the credit for successes, as well as the blame for failures, and that's why the party learns from previous mistakes not to repeat them. Eric Li once said that "You can't change the government in China, but the policies do change. Whereas in USA, you can change your government, but the overall policies remain unchanged." And there's still the fact that because of presidential term limits, the US President have to step down after 4-8 years and they can't make long term plans spanning 10 years or more, whereas China can hatch many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future.
    1
  21416.  @rogerdodger8415  Those WMDs found were pre-1991 weapons and had long been deactivated. You said Saddam held them in order to avert an invasion, then why on Earth did USA proceed to invade Iraq? Iraq today under so-called "democracy" is arguably worst off than it was before. According to Iraq Body Count, the Iraq War resulted in an estimated 200,000 Iraqi civilians killed so how is this cause to celebrate?
    1
  21417.  @rogerdodger8415  Those WMDs found were pre-1991 weapons and had long been deactivated, how were US soldiers harmed by deactivated WMDs? They aren't called WMDs for nothing, if your soldiers were harmed, then it should be widespread devastation yet this wasn't the case.
    1
  21418.  @rogerdodger8415  Even then UN General Secretary Kofi Annan had formally denounced the US invasion of Iraq as illegal and having violated UN charter. According to BBC News: Iraq war illegal, says Annan Kofi Annan. The United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan has told the BBC the US-led invasion of Iraq was an illegal act that contravened the UN charter. He said the decision to take action in Iraq should have been made by the Security Council, not unilaterally.
    1
  21419.  @rogerdodger8415  According to your BBC source: There is no concrete evidence that the network is linked to the Chinese government, So what's the point of the study? They can just take anyone's account and claim they are pro-China or anti-USA, but they got no concrete evidence for their claims.
    1
  21420.  @rogerdodger8415  According to your source: It’s generally thought that trigonometry — a subset of geometry and what’s displayed on the tablet in a crude sense — was developed by ancient Greeks like the philosopher Pythagoras. However, analysis of the tablet suggests it was created 1,000 years before Pythagoras was born. which was exactly what I said. Even in China, with contents known much earlier, but in surviving texts dating from roughly the 1st century BC, the Chinese text Zhoubi Suanjing 《周髀算经》 (The Arithmetical Classic of the Gnomon and the Circular Paths of Heaven) gives a reasoning for the Pythagorean theorem for the (3, 4, 5) triangle—in China it is called the "Gougu theorem" 《勾股定理》. During the Han Dynasty (202 BC to 220 AD), Pythagorean triples appear in The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art, together with a mention of right triangles. Some believe the theorem arose first in China, where it is alternatively known as the "Shang Gao theorem" (商高定理) named after the Duke of Zhou's astronomer and mathematician, whose reasoning composed most of what was in the Zhoubi Suanjing.
    1
  21421.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou Yes, there's no concrete evidence when THE CHINESE REFUSE AN INVESTIGATION" China allowed World Health Organization investigation team to arrive in Wuhan on Jan 2020, where the team visited Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The WHO team's report was that the coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan market, and the lab leak theory has been dismissed as "highly improbable" so who said Chinese refused an investigation?
    1
  21422.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou There WAS NO Iraq war. Understand that? War was never declared." Former US President Bush even announced the Iraq War (video:youtu.be/5BwxI_l84dc )
    1
  21423.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou Question for you... Why do you praise and support the UN when a China puppet like Kofi Annan is a supporter, but IGNORE THEM when they rule against you?" When did the UN rule against China? You're the one denouncing the UN when Kofi Annan declared the Iraq War as illegal and violated UN Charter. Here's Kofi Annan (video:youtu.be/EitbzTAJWws )
    1
  21424.  @rogerdodger8415  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  21425.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Our President CAN NOT and is UNABLE to announce war." Former President Bush did. Here's another video: 2003: President Bush announces invasion of Iraq youtu.be/2zT-ZHBbOzM
    1
  21426.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "神州 Shenzhou He announced start of "OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM".. Pay no attention to what the title of the video says. Someone (like you) just describes it as war) It was a military operation." So those Iraq being invaded by the USA is not a war, only a "military operation"? In another country, Iraq? Without the approval of Iraq? Then it's a war isn't it?
    1
  21427.  @rogerdodger8415  The so-called "Hague Ruling" was made by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which is a non-UN agency it only happens to share the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) but the two organizations are not related. The United Nations clarified on its Chinese microblog yesterday that the tribunal that ruled against China’s historic claims over the disputed South China Sea was not a UN agency. Source: SCMP: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal So since the PCA is not a UN agency, then China reserves the right not to adhere to it's ruling. And my question still remains: "When did the UN rule against China?"
    1
  21428.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou Was THIS a war too?? On 1 February 1951..." Yes, but it was in response to USA invading North Korea and pushing past the 38th Line of Parallel and into North Korean territory, right up to the border with China (Liaoning province) so China joined in Korean War, to help our North Korean allies push back the invading forces.
    1
  21429.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "The UN sent the case FOR ARBITRATION to try and have the parties settle the issue. The court ruled AGAINST CHINA after hearing ALL of their complaints." What is the name of that court? The Hague Court that did the South China Sea ruling was the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which is a non-UN agency it only happens to share the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) so how does the PCA represent the UN? From Wikipedia: "The PCA is constituted through two separate multilateral conventions[5] with a combined[3] membership of 122 states.[3] The organization is *not a United Nations agency*"
    1
  21430.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou Yes, that's correct. When the USA declares war, it must be approved by the Congress." But UN Secretary General Kofi Annan had called the US invasion of Iraq illegal and as having violated UN charter. Video: Kofi Annan - US did not have legal authority to invade Iraq youtu.be/EitbzTAJWws
    1
  21431.  @rogerdodger8415  "It was very disappointing to the Americans that our government did not use the Atomic bomb on the Chinese as they crossed the Yalu River." Yeah, it shows you don't care nuts for Chinese people, you're blatantly anti-China that's all and care nothing for China's interest. You want Yalu River to become a nuclear wasteland with nuclear radiation seeping into the poisoned land, that's all.
    1
  21432.  @rogerdodger8415  "On 12 July 2016, an independent arbitral tribunal established under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) published a clear and binding ruling on China’s claims vis-à-vis the Philippines in the South China Sea" What's the name of this "independent arbitral tribunal"? Your source doesn't even bother to name the tribunal, it just calls it "arbitral tribunal" that's all. Turns out this arbitral tribunal is the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which is clearly a non-UN agency it only shares the same office space as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Hague, but the two organisations are unrelated. So again, how does it show that PCA is UN-backed when it's not even a UN agency?
    1
  21433.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou Shenzhou.. I have just discovered that even BEFORE the Communists took power and killed MANY MILLIONS of Chinese under Mao, that there already was many Chinese atrocities." China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. With such a long continuous history, it's no wonder many atrocities occur throughout China's millennia long lifetime. Whereas the US Has Been at war for more than 92% of the time. Research conducted by the “Jang Group and Geo Television Network” reveals that the United States has been at war for about 225 of the 243 years since its inception in 1776. While the number of US foreign military interventions had stood at 188 till 2017, the world super power was found involved in 117 “partisan electoral interventions” between 1946 and 2000 or around one of every nine ballot exercises held since Second World War. This means that the United States has been at war for more than 92 per cent of the time since its birth, making critics view that the rulers of the land found by Christopher Columbus have been addicted to the use of military might and intoxicated with their successes against weaker nations that could not defend themselves for one reason or the other. Or in other words, the United States has only been at peace for less than 20 years. Source: The US Has Been at war 225 out of 243 years since 1776 https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/595752-the-us-has-been-at-war-225-out-of-243-years-since-1776
    1
  21434.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou Shenzou do you sleep well at night knowing that you support these criminals?"_ A recent Harvard University study has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    1
  21435.  @rogerdodger8415  Why is it inconceivable to you that majority of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China, according to Harvard University study? The survey team found that compared to public opinion patterns in the U.S., in China there was very high satisfaction with the central government. In 2016, the last year the survey was conducted, 95.5 percent of respondents were either “relatively satisfied” or “highly satisfied” with Beijing. In contrast to these findings, Gallup reported in January of this year that their latest polling on U.S. citizen satisfaction with the American federal government revealed only 38 percent of respondents were satisfied with the federal government.
    1
  21436.  @rogerdodger8415  Congratulations on USA winning the most number of gold medals as well as the most number of medals in the Olympics.
    1
  21437.  @rogerdodger8415  North Korean government provides Free Housing to its citizens, from university professors in Pyongyang to peasants out on the countryside. Video:youtu.be/9eya8b2U8a4 (in Chinese) Communism is the belief that resources should be distributed according to those in need, whereas Capitalists seek to hoard resources from themselves. Look at in America, where landlords are evicting tenants because of their inability to pay rent.
    1
  21438.  @rogerdodger8415  "7. Barge into your house to force you off the airwaves... when up to eight policemen barged into his home," This happened in the US, look at tragic death of Breonna Taylor, where plain-clothes SWAT-force barged into her boyfriend's house where she was sleeping and shot her at least 5 times, killing her, and seemingly no punishment been given to the SWAT team. Video:youtu.be/lDaNU7yDnsc You said: "8. Trap you in your house, and detain people who come to see you. 9. Forbid you from leaving the country." Edward Snowden and Julian Assange of Wikileaks have had their US passports revoked, so doesn't this happen in countries around the world? "10. Intercept your protests before they even begin." I remember US police firing teargas at peaceful protestors so that Trump could take a selfie at church, holding the Bible upside down. Video:youtu.be/hblX9QwPDaw
    1
  21439.  @rogerdodger8415  "This happens every day in China. Do the Communists report it? Police that do these things are punished," How do know that this happens everyday in China if the communists don't report it? And Breonna Taylor's murderers weren't punished. African Americans are getting shot/killed by police officers such as George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks, and so on, sparking off Black Lives Matter protests across the USA.
    1
  21440.  @rogerdodger8415  According to Kishore Mahbubani, USA is the only developed country where the bottom 50% of income groups have grown poorer over the last 4 decades. If you want to look at the VERY POOREST people in the USA, they are the homeless people living in tents and cars that don't have a permanent roof over their heads. Source: How poor people survive in the USA DW Documentary youtu.be/CtTcpe5UPhg Whereas North Korean government (despite being poorer than USA) is building free houses for its people.
    1
  21441.  @rogerdodger8415  Here's a cycle through the homeless tent camps in Anaheim. Video: Homeless in Anaheim youtu.be/04Z3Rd0rD_I
    1
  21442.  @rogerdodger8415  China released floodwaters in order to divert floods from the cities. China's military has blasted a dam to release floodwaters threatening one of its most heavily populated provinces, as the death toll in widespread flooding rose to at least 25. The dam operation was carried out late Tuesday night in the city of Luoyang, just as severe flooding overwhelmed the Henan provincial capital of Zhengzhou.
    1
  21443.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou I wonder if the North Koreans will have beautiful new homes like the Chinese?" Chinese companies would be glad to invest in North Korea, building roads, railways, highways, bridges, buildings, and expanding business operations in DPRK. But they can't do much because of US crippling sanctions on North Korea, limiting what Chinese companies can do in North Korea. If only the USA would lift their sanctions on DPRK, then Chinese companies would rush to invest in North Korea and help them develop their country.
    1
  21444.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou Here's a video about Japan for you.. I want you to listen for the words "self defense".." That's the name of the Japanese Self-Defense Force. The fact remains that Taiwan is not part of Japan, so as long as the hypothetical conflict between Taiwan and the mainland doesn't intrude upon Japanese territory, then Japan is unable to claim self-defense.
    1
  21445.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "Like China has (had) and Capitalism in Hong Kong, we have Communism in California." About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    1
  21446.  @rogerdodger8415  Let's take a look at the toll that Capitalism enacted on Hong Kong. In Hong Kong, the rich are very rich, and the poor are very poor. Hong Kong is a tax heaven, since there are no taxes charged on capital gains, interest, or dividends; there are also no net-worth or public benefit taxes. But because of the lack of income from taxes, the Hong Kong government needs to find an alternative source of revenue. One alternative is to overcharge property prices in Hong Kong. You said: Inside Hong Kong’s cage homes youtu.be/hLrFyjGZ9NU As stated earlier, the main aim of capitalism is profit, even if it means driving up property prices at the expense of people, whereas communism is the belief of allocating resources according to need, such as North Korea building free houses for the people.
    1
  21447.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "If the problem with Capitalism (, as you say, is the unequal sharing of blessings, then the problem with Communism is the equal sharing of miseries!" Exactly, the problem with Communism is the equal sharing of miseries. If your country is communist and your country's economy is poor, then it's only sharing the misery among the people, that's why Deng Xiaoping proposed "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics" (中国特色社会主义). The theory stipulated that China was in the primary stage of socialism due to its relatively low level of material wealth and needed to engage in economic growth before pursuing a more egalitarian form of socialism, with the end goal being communism (as described in Marxist orthodoxy.) You said: "Those show houses to impress the world media, doesn't hide the fact that there's no running water. no electricity, and no food supply for the vast majority of North Korea." North Korea is poor, because the United States slapped crippling sanctions against the DPRK and stifle it's economic growth. Given the opportunity, Chinese companies would be glad to expand their business operations in North Korea, providing food, building pipelines for running water, plumbing, gas and electricity, electric lines, roads, railways, highways, buildings, etc. But Chinese companies are hindered from doing so, because the US sanctions in place, halting China from developing North Korea. Why not get the USA to lift their sanctions on North Korea, so that Chinese companies can expand and develop North Korea further? But USA won't do that, because their agenda is to show the bad side of communists. Even American Investor, Jim Rogers exclaimed that: "I'm a Citizen of the Land of the Free, but I cannon invest in your country (DPRK)" youtu.be/D4Kk6miiymk?t=111
    1
  21448.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou Exactly. And those POOREST PEOPLE still live better than two thirds of the world!!" But the thing is, America is a developed country while two thirds of the world (including China) are developing countries. How is such poor living conditions in USA (where landlords can evict tenants for being unable to pay rent, leaving people) homeless, an example of living better? There are so many other problems of capitalism besides housing, just take education for example. Fresh graduates just graduated from university, and they haven't even found a job and stabilized their income, yet many are already shackled by debt and worried about paying off their student loan. Marxists argue in favor of free education for everyone, even to poor families unable to afford it. Education is the cornerstone of economic and social development, but if students are worried about paying off huge student loans upon graduation and being shackled by debt, then in my opinion, it's an unfortunate and unnecessary side effect of capitalism.
    1
  21449.  @rogerdodger8415  China's ghost cities are slowly being filled up. For example, in 2011, London’s Daily Mail reported that Zhengzhou was China’s largest ghost city. But today, Zhengzhou has a has a population of 10,120,000 inhabitants, and had a GDP of 1,014 billion(RMB) in 2018. Don't believe me? Here's a short 4min video of beautiful Zhengzhou: youtu.be/jFdLkgDS-QE?t=8 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  21450.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou LOOK up the name Gavin Newsome...What Communist are YOU removing for their crimes?" In 2020, Beijing fired Wuhan local provincial government officials for their incompetence in handling the Covid-19 outbreak in Wuhan. Even in the latest resurgence, more than 30 Chinese officials have been punished or fired for their incompetence in handling the latest resurgence. Among those fired were a vice mayor, heads of city districts and health commissions, and staff in hospital management, airport and tourism departments. Whereas which American official have been punished for their abject failure to handle Covid19? Even this Gavin Newsom is STILL the governor of California, so how is your political system effective in enacting change? You have freedom of speech to criticise and complain about Gavin Newsom, but there hasn't been a change in California's govern
    1
  21451.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "storms dropped the equivalent of one year's worth of water on the city in a 72 hour period before moving northward, flooding large swathes of Henan province in China." Tragically, the storm is an destructive act of nature, dropping 1 years worth of rain in 3 days, that's bound to trigger a flood. But the point was that Zhengzhou was once considered China’s largest ghost city in 2011 by London’s Daily Mail, but today has 12 million residents, so what's you point about ghost cities then?
    1
  21452.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou WAIT, wait... one minute you're telling me how China is overtaking the USA and the next minute that you are only a developing country!" I specifically said China's economy is forecasted to someday overtake the USA in the foreseeable future (even you admitted this when you said: "China's GDP will overtake that of the US sooner or later") but China still fits the criteria of a developing country as outlined in this checklist: Does China have a low Human Development Index (HDI) relative to other countries? Yes. Does China have low levels of access to safe drinking water? Yes. Does China have high levels of pollution? Yes. Does China have a high number of road traffic accidents? Yes. ... Then China is currently still a developing country, despite China's economy being expected to surpass the United State's economy some time in the foreseeable future. That's just the way it is.
    1
  21453.  @rogerdodger8415  "China can't afford to give any more to North Korea, and they have nothing to offer China" North Korea is China's neighbor, if North Korea collapses, then North Korean refugees would flood it's neighbors, South Korea and China. So isn't it in China's best interest to continue supporting North Korea, our direct neighbor? You said: "You buy grain and soybean from the USA to feed your hungry people, so how much can you give to Kim?" China imports grain and soybean mainly as animal feed. China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food to export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. https://wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_producing_countries_of_agricultural_commodities
    1
  21454.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou North Korea sharply stepped up trade in coal and oil products last year in defiance of UN sanctions through the apparent help of China’s shipping industry, a UN panel has said." So clearly, North Korea is poor because USA slapped crippling sanctions on DPRK and stymied their economic growth, resulting in mass poverty. I mean, if the USA lifted its sanctions on North Korea, then Chinese companies would be able to expand business operations in North Korea, exporting food, building pipelines for running water, gas lines, electric lines, telephone lines, building roads, railways, highways, and better infrastructure for North Korean citizens. But our Chinese companies are limited because of US sanctions on North Korea. Imagine a hypothetical world, where USA lifts their sanctions on North Korea, allowing Chinese companies to develop their country, building infrastructure and increasing DPRK GDP through global trade. Isn't that a better option, so that North Korean citizens get to modernize, industrialize to keep up with the rest of the world? But the USA won't allow this, because it would depict communism in a positive light, that's why they slapped sanctions on North Korea and halted their economic progress.
    1
  21455.  @rogerdodger8415  "It's the lying, thieving, cheating, oppressive, controlling, Communists that keep the people from being a developed country" How? Under the Communist Party of China, China has transformed from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy today, the world's factory (Made-In-China) having world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the communist party, despite Western anti-China propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along, so how is it the communists that keep China from being a developing country? The goal of the Communist party is to achieve a moderately prosperous China, and they are taking steps to lift millions of people out of poverty and into middle class, so how is the communists preventing China from becoming a developed country when it's their goal all along?
    1
  21456.  @rogerdodger8415  "So, IF YOU DO have so much vegetables, then GIVE THEM TO NORTH KOREA!!" China has been sending humanitarian aid by providing vast amounts of food assistance and also 550,000 tons of fertilizer to help North Korea grow their own food. North Korea is our neighbor and ally, China would gladly expand trade relations with North Korea, if not for the US sanctions crippling DPRK's economy, you think Chinese companies would shy away from helping develop North Korea? The solution is so simple, why not get USA to lift all economic sanctions on North Korea, allowing Chinese companies access to North Korea to build roads, railways, highways, gas lines, plumbing lines, electric lines, and other infrastructure? It's the US sanctions on North Korea that's hindering it's economic growth, but you rather blame China for trying to help North Korea.
    1
  21457.  @rogerdodger8415  China has come to North Korea's aid yet again by providing vast amounts of food assistance and also 550,000 tons of fertilizer to help the reclusive and impoverished country recover from summer typhoon damage that ravaged farmland. Source: The Asahi Shimbun: China bailout to North Korea: massive food and fertilizer aid
    1
  21458.  @rogerdodger8415  China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. *1. China (81,500,000 tonnes) 2. Indonesia (23,200,000 tonnes) 3. India (10,800,000 tonnes) 4. Vietnam (6,420,471 tonnes) 5. United States (5,375,386 tonnes) ... https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishing_industry_by_country
    1
  21459.  @rogerdodger8415  Markets are not exclusive to Capitalism. If you look at history, markets have have existed before capitalism. Slave markets existed even during feudalism and before the industrial revolution, even the Soviet Union had markets where people could trade goods according to prices. The problem with capitalism is that even basic necessities like food, housing, transportation, education, access to healthcare get privatised and these companies aren't out to help communities, they are out to turn a profit at the expense of people. Look at the landlords evicting tenants for being unable to pay their rents, look at fresh graduates already shackled by debt and worrying about paying off their student loans, in addition to finding a job. Even in transportation, bus and train companies can raise their fares, making commuting to work expensive as time goes by, whereas in China, bus and train fares remain affordable to the masses.
    1
  21460.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou No, I said PRIVATE OWNERSHIP of those goods and services." Look, after the communists came to power in China, Chairman Mao actually seized the lands from the rich corrupt landlords (who've been taxing peasants their entire life) and he redistributed those lands to the dirt-poor peasantry. For the first time in centuries, peasants in China finally get to own property and have land to call their own. Given that at that time, most of China consisted of mostly of peasants and that landlords were in the minority, overall, there was actually an increase in private ownership of land in China after the communists came to power in China. You said: "Now, I've shown you the substandard apartments that you phrase as "homes"." Substandard apartments? I mean, go ask those homeless Americans whether they want a free "substandard apartment" paid for by the government, as compared to them sleeping on the streets. I mean, you're so fortunate yourself to have a roof over your head, yet your'e complained about how the less fortunate getting free housing that doesn't fit your insanely high standard of living? Who do you think you are? As for "substandard" we all know the reason why North Korean government is poor, it's because of US slapping crippling sanctions on North Korea and stymied their economy, that's why those apartments are "substandard". And I have stated many times that Chinese companies would gladly expand their business in North Korea, building pipelines, gas pipes, plumbing, running water and electricity, but the US sanctions are the obstacle hindering North Korea's success. I mean, go ahead and ask those homeless Americans whether they'll want to live in a North Korean house built and fully paid for by the government.
    1
  21461.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "Unfinished ghost cities that have wasted untold government resources" Did you watch your own Ghost City video, your video actually claimed that Chinese are buying 2nd property and even 3rd property as investments. It said China is in the process of migrating millions of people from the rural countryside into the urban centers and those ghost cities are filling up with people and will inevitably spring to life. Go watch your own video. You said: "The people of the Capitalist countries have the wealth AND the freedom to move to ANY socialist or Communist system. Very few do. In fact, we have tens of thousands coming here" Because Capitalist countries favor rich people, that's why rich people would want to remain in capitalist countries, whereas Socialist/Communist system is about taxing the rich to provide for the poor, so of course which wealthy person would want to move to a socialist/communist system and get taxed by the government? Americans often lament that the rich 1% control 99% of the population, then why would this 1% even want to move to countries that tax the rich? The Capitalist system favors the wealthy after all. You said: "WHY? Because of landlords evicting non paying tenants? No, because a luxury two bedroom apartment can be had for a fourth of average income, and a 18-2000 square foot home purchased for even less." Then why does America have homeless people as landlords evict tenants for being unable to pay the rent? Why do fresh graduates, who haven't even found proper work and stabilized their income, already have to worry about paying off their student loan? Why don't every homeless person in America have a "luxury two bedroom" apartment like you said? You said: "How many Chinese in Canada and USA? Now, how many of USA and Canada living in China in the workers paradise?" China is the country with the world's largest population at 1.4 billion people, and 4x the population of the USA, so of course there will be more immigrants migrating out of China to USA and Canada, than there would be Americans and Canadians migrating to China. You said: "You work all your life you are still a peasant. In the USA you work all your life and you become rich. You work smart AND hard AND take a risk, you become a millionaire! " That's the seductive promise of the American Dream, that somehow every new immigrant can somehow strike it rich in America and climb the corporate ladder and become rich. But we all know by now, that that's merely a pipedream! You can work HARD all you want, but doesn't mean you will get anywhere. You can work SMART all you want, but your boss takes all the credit. You can take enormous RISK, and get burned so badly, losing your money in the stock market. That's why they are called "RISKS" for crying out loud, because you could lose everything. You said: "FREE to start any business. FREE to choose to live WHERE and HOW you wish. CHOICE that leads to competition and ultimately to SUPERIOR goods and services." Every day in China there are so many business start-ups, even foreign entrepreneurs come to China and start their own business here. China has the world's largest number of "unicorns," privately-held start-up firms valued at more than $1bn (£771m), according to a new report. The country has produced 206 unicorns while the US has 203, the China-based Hurun Institute reported. And what competition when in USA, there are monopolies like Amazon, Google, Facebook, Apple, dominating their respective industries, eliminating competition from smaller American firms, and stifling competition through competition? China has anti-monopoly laws to clamp down on anti-competitive practices, even Alibaba, Tencent and Didi are facing investigations into anti-competitive practices.
    1
  21462.  @rogerdodger8415  Even the US Government Supported Pol Pot so what are you bringing up this issue for? According to September 16, 1980 The Washington Post "U.S. to Support Pol Pot Regime For U.N. Seat" The United States will support the seating of Pol Pot's "democratic Kampuchea" regime in the United Nations again this year despite its abhorrent record on human rights, Secretary of State Edmund S. Muskie announced yesterday. Speaking to a news conference, Muskie said the U.S. decision -- the subject of speculation and controversy at home and abroad -- was made at the behest of Southeast Asian allies and after "careful diplomatic soundings" that Vietnam is unwilling to negotiate the withdrawal of its forces from Kampuchea. So why complain about China when USA also supported Pol Pot and the Republic of Kampuchea?
    1
  21463.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou Between 1958 and 1962, 45 million people starved to death in China" Where did you get this figure of 45 million starving to death between 1958 and 1962? China's population in 1955 was 612,241,552 and by 1960, China's population had increased to 660,408,054, having increased by 48,166,502. Search for a website called Population Pyramid China (1955) So you're saying from 1958-1962, China's population decreased by 45 million, yet according to my source, from 1950-1960, China's population actually increased by 48 million? Where did you get your bloated death toll figures from?
    1
  21464.  @rogerdodger8415  "神州 Shenzhou Because it was diplomatic support and not material, financial, and armament support. The mass murder was kept secret from the west.. NOT from China"_ The USA clearly supported Pol Pot. Where's your evidence that the mass murder was kept secret from the West, NOT from China? When Vietnam intervened in Cambodia and drove the Pol Potists from power in January 1972, Washington took immediate steps to preserve the Khmer Rouge as a guerrilla movement. International relief agencies were pressured by the U.S. to provide humanitarian assistance to the Khmer Rouge guerrillas who fled into Thailand. During his reign as National Security Adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski said, " I encouraged the Chinese to support Pol Pot. I encouraged the Thai to help the DK [Democratic Kampuchea]. The question was how to help the Cambodian people. Pol Pot was an abomination. We could not support him but China could." So clearly, USA knew that Pol Pot was an abomination according to National Security Adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski.
    1
  21465.  @rogerdodger8415  Look at tragic Miami building collapse youtu.be/kKG5f0tAuM0 and you still want to complain about Chinese construction?
    1
  21466.  @rogerdodger8415  You literally quoted a report that some $215 million in American aid found their way into the Khmer Rouge, so you are confirming what I said. USA clearly supports the Pol Pot, even the Washington Post wrote that United States will support the seating of Pol Pot's "democratic Kampuchea" regime in the United Nations again this year despite its abhorrent record on human rights, Secretary of State Edmund S. Muskie announced in 1980. Speaking to a news conference, Muskie said the U.S. decision -- the subject of speculation and controversy at home and abroad -- was made at the behest of Southeast Asian allies and after "careful diplomatic soundings" that Vietnam is unwilling to negotiate the withdrawal of its forces from Kampuchea. The U.S. government's secret partnership with the Khmer Rouge grew out of the U.S. defeat in the Vietnam War. After the fall of Saigon in 1975, the U.S.-worried by the shift in the Southeast Asian balance of power-turned once again to geopolitical confrontation. It quickly formalized an anti-Vietnamese, anti-Soviet strategic alliance with China-an alliance whose disastrous effects have been most evident in Cambodia. For the U.S., playing the "China card" has meant sustaining the Khmer Rouge as a geopolitical counterweight capable of destabilizing the Hun Sen government in Cambodia and its Vietnamese allies. When Vietnam intervened in Cambodia and drove the Pol Potists from power in January 1972, Washington took immediate steps to preserve the Khmer Rouge as a guerrilla movement. International relief agencies were pressured by the U.S. to provide humanitarian assistance to the Khmer Rouge guerrillas who fled into Thailand. For more than a decade, the Khmer Rouge have used the refugee camps they occupy as military bases to wage a contra-war in Cambodia. During his reign as National Security Adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski played an important role in determining how the U.S. would support the Pol Pot guerrillas. Elizabeth Becker, an expert on Cambodia, recently wrote, "Brzezinski himself claims that he concocted the idea of persuading Thailand to cooperate fully with China in efforts to rebuild the Khmer Rouge.... Brzezinski said, " I encouraged the Chinese to support Pol Pot. I encouraged the Thai to help the DK [Democratic Kampuchea]. The question was how to help the Cambodian people. Pol Pot was an abomination. We could not support him but China could."
    1
  21467.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "Don't we ALSO provide relief to NORTH KOREA??" The United States slapped crippling sanctions on North Korea and stymied their economic growth. It's the USA that's responsible for the sad state of DPRK economy today. China is North Korea's biggest trading partner of North Korea and Chinese companies would gladly their expand business operations, building pipelines, plumbing systems, electric wires, gas pipes and so much more, but our companies are hindered by US sanctions. USA is responsible for the mess they created in North Korean economy, yet you're complaining that China is unable to clean up your mess? Why don't you get the USA to lift their sanctions on North Korea if you want their country to develop? And it's not just North Korea, the USA also slapped sanctions on Russia, Cuba, Iran, Venezuela. Venezuela was once a prosperous socialist government until Trump slapped sanctions on Venezuela and cause their food prices to skyrocket.
    1
  21468.  @rogerdodger8415  USA KNEW about Pol Pot's abhorrent human rights record, read the 1980 Washington Post and it wrote: United States will support the seating of Pol Pot's "democratic Kampuchea" regime in the United Nations again this year despite its abhorrent record on human rights, Secretary of State Edmund S. Muskie announced in 1980. So what makes you claim USA didn't know about his crimes?
    1
  21469.  @rogerdodger8415  One homeless veteran doesn't represent all the homeless in America, why don't those people offer a home for the newly evicted tenants who've been made homeless after getting evicted by landlords? And those US veterans that fought in Vietnam War, Korean War, Iraq War, etc were soldiers who invaded other countries and killed locals on their lands, what did they do to defend their homeland of America?
    1
  21470.  @rogerdodger8415  You said: "China supports murderous regimes DURING their murders and massacres. Even after they learn of crimes against humanity, THEY CONTINUE to support this criminals." Yeah and the USA supports the totalitarian government of Saudi Arabia, even after a reporter Khashoggi was killed by Saudi Arabian Crown Prince. President Trump chosen to stand with Saudi Arabian Prince and called Khashoggi "an enemy of the state" so it's clear that USA does the same thing.
    1
  21471.  @rogerdodger8415  The U.S. not only permitted the Khmer Rouge to use the refugee camps in Thailand as a base for its war against the new government in Phnom Penh but it also helped Prince Norodom Sihanouk and former Prime Minister Son Sann to organize their own guerrilla armies from the refugee population in the camps. These camps are an integral factor in the ability of the Khmer Rouge, the Sihanoukist National Army (ANS) and Son Sann's Khmer People's National Liberation Front (KPNLF) to wage war against the Hun Sen government. In 1979, Washington began "a small program" of support for Sihanouk's and Son Sann's guerrillas by providing "travel expenses" for the "insurgent leaders" and funds "for the up keep of resistance camps near the Thai-Cambodian border." In addition, since 1982, the U.S. has provided the ANS and KPNLF with covert and overt "humanitarian" and "non lethal" military aid. By 1989, the secret non lethal aid had grown to between $20 million and $24 million annually and the overt humanitarian aid had reached $5 million. The Bush administration requested $7 million more in humanitarian aid for 1990.
    1
  21472.  @rogerdodger8415  Why not simply get the United States to lift all their sanctions on North Korea then? Allow Chinese companies expand business operations further in DPRK to develop their country? That would be the BEST case scenario, let North Korea industrialise and mondernize to show the difference in political ideology? I mean, look at Socialist Republic of Vietnam, under the Communist Party of Vietnam for example. On February 4, 1994, the United States lifted a 19-year trade embargo that had prohibited virtually all trade between the United States and Vietnam, and now Vietnam is growing under their socialist system under their communist party. Using Vietnam as an example, if USA lift their sanctions on North Korea then perhaps the DPRK will develop to around Vietnam's level of development.
    1
  21473. China's Metaverse is turning Cyberspace into Realspace. The U.S's Metaverse is turning Realspace into Cyberspace.
    1
  21474. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21475. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  21476.  @antoniohagopian213  One brand of Chinese EV car is able to swap out an empty battery for a full battery so that you won't have to wait for the battery to charge. EV technology is getting better everyday, especially in China.
    1
  21477. +LEFT4BASS Then what's the whole point of bringing up China having a lot of land then? What's the point of mentioning China's population density and making comparisons to S. Korea population density? About China sticking out because of rapidly shrinking our population at once, it is due to this rapid shrinkage, that the government was able to lift about 600 million people out of poverty in just 30 years. Just for comparison, the population of the entire African continent (Nigeria, Kenya, Ethiopia, etc) is about 1.2 billion people. So the CCP in fact, lifted a number equal to 1/2 of Africa's entire population out of poverty, in decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. Also, if the Chinese government was able to sharply cut our birth rate, then there's no reason to believe that the reverse can happen too, and that the government can implement policies to sharply increase the birth rate (if needed). About the decreasing number of workers in China, China's next phase is to embrace automation to replace our factory workers. China is already the world's largest market for robots and we opened Asia's first automated port in Qingdao. The robots are very efficient because they can work 24 hours, throughout the night and much more efficiently as well. China's automated warehouse are even capable of sorting 200,000 packages a day. Asia’s first automated container terminal, at Port of Qingdao, China video: youtube.com/watch?v=bn2GPNJmR7A Robots sorting system helps Chinese company finish at least 200,000 packages a day in the warehouse video: youtube.com/watch?v=_QndP_PCRSw If China can make robotic workers like this, then perhaps one day humans might be able to make robotic caregivers to help ease the burden of taking care of the elderly. About calling Forbes biased, I based my assumption on various Western articles since the 1990s, that consistently claim that China is going to have a hard landing. Am I wrong for calling those articles biased, given that I provided evidence to support my stance? China's economy is still intact, running and growing, so am I wrong fall calling those previous articles 'biased'? If so, then why haven't their predictions about Chinese come true yet? About China planning into the future, the CCP has made numerous 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc, to map out China's future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc, and to set specific goals to achieve by then. Have you heard of China's Belt and Road Initiative for example? It is a long-term project meant to connect the world by trade, and would probably take several decades to realize.
    1
  21478.  Cyrus Janssen  You're not the real Cyrus Janssen, why are you copying his username and profile picture?
    1
  21479. Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can. Even at the Olympics, athletes from Taiwan can only compete under the name "Chinese Taipei" which goes to show Taiwan is not a country, merely part of China.
    1
  21480. In 1947, the Republic of China_🇹🇼 published the 11-Dash Line claiming more territory in the South China Sea than the 9-Dash Line later adopted by _People's Republic of China 🇨🇳. You're saying that the Philippines supports Taiwan's claim to the 11 Dash Line?
    1
  21481.  @jhunvlogs3304  So if that's how you feel about support for Mindano independence from Philippines, then why are you trying to separate Taiwan from mainland China? You're the one calling for a part of our country to be independent, yet if others do the same to yours, you react strongly against it?
    1
  21482.  @jhunvlogs3304  "Shenzhou. besides youre 11 dash line map has no match on our map which is older than China Map" Where's this map of yours?
    1
  21483.  @jhunvlogs3304  So you're saying that this new Philippine map is based on the Hague tribunal's 2016 ruling? That means it's not an old 300 map, it's only 8 years old given that it draws its support from the 2016 tribunal.
    1
  21484.  @jhunvlogs3304  No, by your admission, Philippines' new map was created in 2016 in the Hague, not in 1734. Also, it's Taiwan that claims the 11 Dash Line Map, while mainland China claims the 9 Dash Line encompassing a smaller area of the South China Sea.
    1
  21485.  @therainbow488  Taiwan claims a larger swathe of the South China Sea (through the 11 Dash Line) than mainland China's 9 Dash Line, so are you saying Philippines supports Taiwan's claims over the South China Sea?
    1
  21486.  @therainbow488  So if China suddenly congratulates the leader of the Federal Republic of Mindanao and support its right to to co-exist as an independent country, you will also support it?
    1
  21487. +Martin Guevara If India joins in against China, then it is highly likely that China's ally, Pakistan will also join to oppose India, probably fighting over territories in Jammu and Kashmir.
    1
  21488.  @Curry.59  Many Indians (but not all) suffer from a "colonial mentality" which continues to afflict the people of former colonies. Even though India has physically decolonized, the "decolonization of the mind" is still ongoing to heal the mental damage inflicted by the colonizer on the minds of the colonized. They need to break free of their mental chains.
    1
  21489.  @skyeagle3123  You keep saying that you have nothing against the Chinese people, then why do you want China to fall? China has found a system that's proven to work for our country, then if the Communist Party of China falls, it will plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, possibly sending China back to the stone age, then why do you wish for such a catastrophic event to happen to China? Because you don't like our government? Then you're clearly anti-China if you want China to fall, no use pretending that you're not.
    1
  21490.  @rachell4563  They are báizuǒ (白左) indeed. I think the best translation of báizuǒ to English would be the "Social Justice Warriors" (SJWs) who fight for "political correctness" culture not because they themselves believe in the cause (they actually lack conviction in many instances), but just so that they can virtue signal themselves as morally superior over others.
    1
  21491. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  21492. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21493. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  21494. 说真的翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21495. 翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21496. 翻墙之后，就得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21497. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21498.  @eddharm7329  Agreed. If you look up countries by suicide rate, then other East Asian countries like Japan and South Korea are ahead of China in this field.
    1
  21499.  @ryx0817  About enjoying life and surviving life, the cost of living in China is (generally) lower than say living in Japan and/or South Korea. Depending on where you live, food in China tends to be cheap. Rent is cheap. So is electricity, water and gas. Whereas Japan and South Korea have some of the highest cost of living in the world. South Korea follows the US price cap on Russian oil, while Japan forgo the price cap, whereas China is buying cheap gas from Russia.
    1
  21500. It's the story of the Tortoise and the Hare. The Hare (NATO) is exhausting their sanctions options and running out of weapons to send to Ukraine without seeing the finish line, while complaining that the Tortoise is too slow. Whereas the Tortoise (Russia) has plenty of reserves and is making slow but steady progress towards the finish line.
    1
  21501.  @PrimeV88  You said: "China became prosperous at the expense of the West." Studies showed that Chinese workers earned only 10 cents for every dollar of profit that Western companies like Apple and Nike made, so how is it at the expense of the West? It's thanks to Chinese saving up millions of cents over the decades in order to lift millions out of poverty in China.
    1
  21502. +M3M3R M4CH1N3R Take London for example. 50 years ago, the River Thames was so heavily polluted that it was declared biologically dead. London even had the Great Smog of London in 1950s. But look at London today, and while its still dirty, it has greatly improved from the condition it was half a century ago. So who knows how China will be like in 50 years time?
    1
  21503. Western media is the reason why many overseas Chinese have a difficult time explaining what China is like really like to people in the West. Many in the West have never even set foot on China, yet they seek to lecture Chinese on how to govern themselves.
    1
  21504. To see the past 3,000 years of Chinese history, visit Xi'an (西安). To see the past 300 years of Chinese history, visit Beijing (北京). To see the past 30 years of Chinese history, visit Shanghai (上海). To see what the future will be like, visit Shenzhen (深圳).
    1
  21505. +XAIKIA India "was" powerful, not "is" powerful. Just like I could also claim that the Mongolian empire "was" the strongest too.
    1
  21506. +R Soul But Australian aboriginals didn't form any known great ancient civilization nor did they develop any ancient writing systems. Chinese nobility been wearing luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, when the rest of the world wore loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk is precious and highly valued by the West, and an entire route has even been set up and named in honor of the material.
    1
  21507. +louis fill Romans and Greek invented stuff, but so did China. China invented the blast furnace and cupola furnace, discovered cast iron, wrought iron and even learnt to make steel using cast and wrought iron. Chinese invented the world's oldest crossbow, the triple-bow arcuballista, the traction trebuchet, siege towers called sky bridges, and many more. Besides inventing gunpowder, Chinese also invented handcannons, handgrenades, fragmentation bombs, landmines, naval mines, exploding cannonballs, rocket launchers, multi-launch rocket systems, and of course, fireworks. There was even a Chinese flamethrower, capable of launching an continuous stream of flame, just like the ones used in WWII and Vietnam War.
    1
  21508. ​ @johnbuckner2828  It's a myth that Russia and China are dictatorships and therefore don't have to worry about the will of the citizenry. Both Russian President Putin and Chinese President Xi actually enjoy high level of approval from the citizenry, and both were elected for a 3rd term.
    1
  21509.  @abdoul.mb.5294  看来你已经被西方媒体洗脑了。毒奶粉假疫苗关我上YT有什么关系？只是嘿中国而已。如果你看不下去我说的话，我关你啊？请你滚出YT吧。
    1
  21510.  @martinlaoshi  You said: "as Taiwan has a democratic government and self-determination is a core principle of international law." Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    1
  21511.  @martinlaoshi  I can also give you examples of Asian countries that experienced economic growth under authoritarian government. Even South Korea was once a dirt-poor country with a GDP poorer than sub-Saharan African countries, but it was under South Korean dictator, Park Chung-hee, that brought rapid economic growth to South Korea (aka Miracle on the Han River 漢江의 奇蹟). When he came to power in 1961, South Korea's per capita income was only US$72.00 and North Korea was actually the greater economic and military power on the peninsula. One of Park's main goals was to end the poverty of South Korea, and lift the country up from being a Third World economy to a First World economy via statist methods, and Park is credited with playing a pivotal role in the development of South Korea's tiger economy by shifting its focus to export-oriented industrialisation. But Park was also an authoritarian figure and in 1972, Park declared martial law and amended the constitution into a highly authoritarian document. During this time, political opposition and dissent was constantly repressed and Park had complete control of the military, and much control over the media and expressions of art. Yet South Korea developed under Park's dictatorship.
    1
  21512.  @martinlaoshi  "because a Taiwan majority is against reunification at the moment." Where does it say that majority of Taiwan is against reunification? Polls indicate that only a minority (5.6%) of the people of Taiwan want independence and the overwhelming majority (87%) want the status quo to continue. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  21513.  @martinlaoshi  If the US was truly about acknowledging referendums, then they would have acknowledged the 2014 Crimea Referendum in which an overwhelming majority (96.77%) voted to join the Russian Federation. Instead, Washington slapped sanctions on Moscow instead of acknowledging the referendum.
    1
  21514. It's like a doomsday cults predicting the end of the world by a certain date, only for that date to pass uneventfully and forcing them to recalibrate.
    1
  21515.  @chaospilot2142  China's going to collapse? That's what Western economists been saying all along! 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. But its already 2019, and China's economy is still going strong, so doesn't this mean Western economists' predictions about China's collapse have been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    1
  21516.  @chaospilot2142  said "I mean what have people like you ever done to help humanity? You only make the world worse." China today is not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Mozambique, Tanzania, Ghana, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, etc, even in the 21st century. The USA is enacting regime change by bombing those countries and cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gadaffi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now USA is eyeing Assad of Syria, and Maduro of Venezuela for regime change.
    1
  21517.  @chaospilot2142  The US response to dealing with terrorism is to bomb those countries (Iraq War, Afghan War) and this destroys civilian lives and property, leaving families broken, homeless, jobless and harboring resentment against their own government or the USA, that's why they flock to join the terrorists cause. Al Qaeda was once CIA trained but rebelled against their masters after seeing what USA did to the Middle East. Even ISIS is said to be have been born because of US warmongering. This does not solve the problem, since when one terrorist cell is eradicated, another just pops up in its place. China's approach is different. People join the terrorists because they are uneducated, jobless, wanting to feed their families and so on, so China invest in Pakistan to help build up its economy, provide jobs to people, help stabilize Pakistan government and lift more people out of poverty. The terrorists will find a shrinking pool of potential terrorists recruits, because people are able to find work, and develop their country, thus steering themselves away from terrorism. Only time will tell if China's method will be successful or not in Pakistan, but the point is, US's method to dealing with terrorism clearly does not work. Why not try something different, instead of repeating the same method again and again, and expecting it to solve the problem? This is the definition of insanity.
    1
  21518.  @chaospilot2142  The reason why N. Korea is poor today, is because it is still at war with USA, and USA slap crippling sanctions on DPRK. China wants to do more business with DPRK and to invest in its economy to open it up to the rest of the world, but we can't do anything big with the US sanctions in place. Nobody can do big business with DPRK while it's still technically at war with USA, because the war can always resume anytime. It was revealed in 2016 that North Korea approached the United States about conducting formal peace talks to formally end the war. But USA rejected signing a peace treaty, because then, the Korean war will end, investors will start being able to invest in DPRK and the country will finally start to modernize. Even some Americans businessmen like Jim Rogers wanted to invest in DPRK, but can't do so because USA forbid American companies from working with North Korea. "I'm a citizen of the Land of the Free, and I cannot invest in your country (North Korea)" - Jim Rogers, American businessman and financial commentator Video: Trump is making China great again: Jim Rogers youtube.com/watch?v=D4Kk6miiymk&t=100
    1
  21519.  @chaospilot2142  The USA won't ever sign a peace treaty with DPRK, because doing so will open the door for investment in North Korea by foreign companies (including American companies like Jim Roger's investment) and that would cause Pyongyang to grow and prosper, which is not what Washington wants, since it can no longer claim that communism doesn't work. I mean, look at Vietnam, another communist/socialist country, but because Vietnam and USA are at peace, that's why Vietnam is more prosperous than North Korea.
    1
  21520.  @chaospilot2142  So CCP censored the word "Freedom," then what? Westerners censor the word "F**k" on national TV isn't it?
    1
  21521.  @chaospilot2142  When Korea was divided into North Korea (USSR) and South Korea (USA), it was actually communist North Korea that had greater economic wealth than South Korea. South Korea's was dirt-poor, its per capita income was only US$72.00, and lower than even some Sub-Saharan African countries. North Korea was actually the greater economic and military power on the peninsula due to the North's history of heavy industries such as the power and chemical plants, and the large amounts of economic, technical and financial aid it received from other communist bloc countries such as the Soviet Union, East Germany and China. The reason why South Korea is so powerful today, is because it enjoys the benefits of US protection. Unlike North Korea, South Korea is not at war with USA, and USA pump funds into S. Korea to develop its economy. It has US military bases stationed in South Korean soil, so S. Korea don't have to spend so much money on defense budget, whereas China has zero military based in North Korea, so DPRK has to fork out money to build up its military. While S. Korea can allocate more funds from its defense to spend on its economy.
    1
  21522.  @chaospilot2142  What's up with your obsession of China censoring the word "Freedom?" I mean, Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Everybody in the world has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your lands and spending money on your economies. Your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese businesses like Huawei, Xiaomi, Lenovo, Oppo, ZTE, etc are expanding overseas, and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Yet you are seemingly obsessed with Chinese censoring the world "Freedom"? Chinese people can be found literally everywhere in the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  21523.  @chaospilot2142  Because so many people only seem to harbor only negative image of China. Why are you so obsessed to paint China and the CCP in a negative light? And a negative light only? Everything has both good and bad, and its not good to only focus on the bad. So I thought I help enlighten other people by pointing out some of China's achievements. I mean, you people s**t on China all day, then similarly, can't I talk about China's achievements? The Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again, which government body is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's eventually population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, India, Europe and USA. Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China), the world's 3rd largest arms exporter, having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army and funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And its all achieved under CCP leadership. So why can't I give credit where credit is due?
    1
  21524.  @chaospilot2142  Which of my post have been lies and misinformation? I cite sources to support my points where possible and instead of attacking my points, you resort to calling me a liar? Taiwan's rise was because it was under authoritarian single-party Kuomintang rule, for more than half its entire life! For decades, the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist, and KMT leader Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and he imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian KMT rule, Taiwan rapidly flourished and modernized in what's known as "Taiwan Miracle" Between 1952 and 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 and 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 and 1986 and the percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 and 1986. And it was all achieved under authoritarian single-party KMT leadership. But with economic reforms came increasing pressure for political reforms and USA threaten to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan if KMT did not introduce democracy, so in the end, Taiwan became an democracy and its economic growth is in a slump today, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and many Taiwan graduates are seeking employment opportunities overseas, such as in the mainland or in Singapore. So why should China adopt democracy then? Because Westerners say so? China is flourishing under authoritarian CCP rule so why is there a need to introduce democracy then?
    1
  21525.  @chaospilot2142  Just because other countries are democracy, doesn't mean that China have to follow them. Westerner countries became rich because of Industrial Revolution, and it had nothing to do with democracy isn't it? Japan first industrialized during the Meiji Restoration, which was under authoritarian rule of Japanese emperor Meiji (the era was named after him) So what makes you think democracy make rich countries? And I have shown that Taiwan was ruled by authoritarian single-party KMT rule, in which Taiwan's economy flourished. Besides, Taiwan's economy is number 19th, whereas mainland China is ranked 2nd so what's your point? You failed to show why China should adopt democracy like you are claiming.
    1
  21526.  @chaospilot2142  Orville's 1984 is a work of fiction, and the author purposely exaggerate the negative scenario in the story for entertainment purposes and to appeal to readers, but it doesn't necessarily mean reality will follow in its example. And look at China, we are not only the world's 2nd largest economy, but we are flourishing in science and technology too. China is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending and catching up fast to the United States. Source: List of countries by research and development spending wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($451.9 billion) 3. European Union ($379.0 billion) 4. Japan ($165.7 billion) 5. Germany ($118.8 billion) 6. South Korea ($91.6 billion)
    1
  21527.  @phlei95014  South Korea's GDP growth under Park Chung-hee dictatorship grew by an average of more than 8% per year, but after the 1990s, South Korea was badly hit by the Asian Financial Crisis. The point remains that South Korea's economy prospered under the South Korean dictatorship of Park Chung-hee. So you agreed that Taiwan's economic prosperity occurred under authoritarian rule of KMT dictatorship? Taiwan used to be one of the Four Asian Tigers/Dragons, but after democracy was introduced to Taiwan, their economy began to stagnant, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising. Even now, Taiwan's semiconductor industry is suffering under U.S sanctioning chips to mainland China. You said: "South Korea made huge stride after the exit of the dictatorship but it is shrinking now because of the wrong side with China." China is South Korea's biggest trading partner how is China to blame here?
    1
  21528.  @phlei95014  During WWII, Imperial Japan had tanks, fighter jets, submarines, aircraft carriers and battleships because Japan had industrialized much earlier during the 19th Meiji Restoration under the authoritarian rule of Japanese Emperor Meiji. So Japan's modernization occurred under authoritarian rule, not democracy. Japan's industrialization was literally bombed into ruin by the United States of America, so it's not because of democracy that Japan's economy began to blossom.
    1
  21529.  @phlei95014  There are also many countries/regions under authoritarian rule that have become prosperous. Singapore for example, has been under authoritarian single-party rule for 57 years. The People's Action Party ruled Singapore with an iron fist, and Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore's founder) was a dictator who tolerated no dissent and jailed/exiled dissidents and political rivals. Yet the PAP transformed Singapore from a sleepy fishing village nation into a world-class country today, ahead of its neighboring countries in ASEAN. North Korea, Iran (also Cuba, Venezuela) are subject to U.S sanctions, while the simultaneously the U.S poured aid into South Korea and Japan (like you said earlier) so how can you blame dictatorship for these countries being poor? Look at Saudi Arabia for example, it's under authoritarian rule of the Saudi Monarchy, and yet U.S is buddies with Saudi Arabia and that's why their economy is the 18th largest in the world. Or look at the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, they are under the communist party rule, and after the U.S lifted embargo on Vietnam, they began to prosper even though Vietnam is not a Western-style democracy. You said: "Taiwan went no where under the old Chiang , the bad emperor syndrome." No, I've already debunked this with Taiwan's economy flourishing under the authoritarian single-party leadership of the KMT. I've even elaborated how South Korea's economy flourished under Park Chung-hee dictatorship as well as Imperial Japan during the Meiji Restoration period, yet you cannot refute my points, instead you claim it's Western-style democracy that's to be credited?
    1
  21530.  @phlei95014  While Deng's policies have certainly contributed to China's economic growth, it's an unequal form of growth. Capitalism has seeped into China through Deng's policies and it created a wide income gap between the rich and the poor in China. President Xi Jinping has vowed to attain a more equal form of growth through Common Prosperity, otherwise the income inequality in China will only continue to worsen with Deng's policies. About those "rich Chinese escaping", some of them made money through filthy means, and President Xi's anti-corruption campaign is targeting those corrupt Chinese who escape and buy up real estate in other countries in order to launder their money. The money belongs to the people of China, not to the West, and it's the communist party's responsibility to get those wealth back to China and redistribute it more equally. China was one of the wealthiest country in the world four hundred years ago, but China's wealth has been plundered through Western Imperialism. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so the British waged two wars and forced China to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which China didn't want, because it made our people sick. Port cities like Shanghai were forced to open to British Opium and Hong Kong was taken and made into a British colony to act as a drug distribution hub to pump the addiction throughout the rest of China. That's where China's wealth had gone, into the pockets of Westerners. You said: "Does that mean dictatorship means success?" Not all, but I've already cited several examples of countries/regions who were successful under authoritarian rule, like South Korea under Park, Taiwan island under KMT, Imperial Japan under Emperor Meiji, Singapore under Lee Kuan Yew, and so much more. But you seemly do not accept that there are other alternative forms of government apart from Western-style democracy.
    1
  21531.  @ash_u  Indian healthcare workers will also need sufficient masks, gloves, goggles, and PPE suits to prevent doctors and nurses from getting infected themselves.
    1
  21532.  @abhinavbaad3075  Yes, I've seen some videos of Indians making masks in workshops. Video: Making masks | India | Coronavirus youtu.be/KFziEl_GW18
    1
  21533.  @abhinavbaad3075  Video: China: Factory produces 5 million masks a day in bid to supply shortfall youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw?t=17
    1
  21534.  @Andy-P  "Yes that is what they do to countries like Russia." So who knows, maybe one day if your country offends the U.S, they will do the same to your country, freezing your foreign reserves (as the U.S also did to Afghanistan). This makes the dollar less attractive, and it acts as an incentive for Russia and China to develop an alternative currency.
    1
  21535.  @marioreissmann7457  Europe is gradually being de-industrialized by the US. By blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline, the U.S are preventing Germany from accessing cheap Russian gas, which means Germany now has to spend more by getting energy from alternative sources. More expensive energy equals more expensive German products, making them less competitive in pricing in the global market. Closing down European businesses also means the laying off of European workers, who might decide to find work outside of the energy-costly Europe, probably migrating to USA or even China.
    1
  21536.  @Andy-P  From what I heard, the Taliban promised amnesty to those who previously helped in the U.S occupation of Afghanistan. Also recently, during a conference, Ursula von der Leyen outright stated that "Our goal is not just to freeze, but to seize the (Russian) assets." which is outright theft of a country's foreign reserves. This is only going to discourage investors from the Western financial system if they can just invent excuses to steal.
    1
  21537.  @marioreissmann7457  Europe is gradually being de-industrialized by the US. By blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline, the U.S are preventing Germany from accessing cheap Russian gas, which means Germany now has to spend more by getting energy from alternative sources. More expensive energy equals more expensive German products, making them less competitive in pricing in the global market.
    1
  21538.  WatsAp☦️⑴⑵⑹⑼⑻⑻⑶⑵⑷⑶⑼  How come you have the same profile pic as Cyrus Jansen?
    1
  21539.  @flickingbollocks5542  About China's President for life, China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US short term leadership.
    1
  21540.  @flickingbollocks5542  China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans,_ etc to map out China's direction and future in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the term limits, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. Wouldn't you agree that such a system is beneficial in the long-term? Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more.
    1
  21541.  @flickingbollocks5542  China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans,_ etc to map out China's direction and future in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the term limits, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. Wouldn't you agree that such a system is beneficial in the long-term?
    1
  21542.  @KrunoslavStifter  "神州 Shenzhou You try to use increase in population as argument against the death tool. I would not use that as strong argument" What strong argument have you presented at all? You brought up Mao's Four Pests Campaign, but you don't even know the number of sparrows in China at that time, which already reduces your argument to just speculation without concrete facts. Whereas I've been consistently providing statistics, showing that China's population actually increased during the Great Leap Forward, which calls into question the exaggerated death toll of 30 million that you claimed. You said: "nor does the increase in number of people equal *standard of living increase.*" But China's standard of living did increase under Mao. For example, China's growth in life expectancy at birth from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al. 1984; Coale1984; Jamison 1984; Banister 1987; Ravallion 1997; Banister and Hill 2004). Source: An exploration of China's mortality decline under Mao - NCBI ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4331212/ You said: "Furthermore, after Mao died, China was economically it bad shape, and it was not the Mao economics that gave economic boost to China," China's GDP actually increased under Mao, growing from just $30.55 billion (USD) in 1952 to $306 billion in 1980, so how was China economically in bad shape? Here's a graph of China's GDP growth from 1953 to 1980 China's GDP from 1953 to 1980 1952: $30.55 billion 1953: $31.66 billion 1954: $33.02 billion 1955: $35.01 billion 1956: $39.58 billion ... 1976: $153.94 billion 1977: $174.94 billion 1978: $218.50 billion 1979: $263.70 billion 1980: $306.17 billion ... Source: Historical GDP of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_GDP_of_China#China_NBS_data So China under Mao actually had our GDP increase tenfold from 30 billion in 1953 to 300 billion in 1980.
    1
  21543.  @KrunoslavStifter  "神州 Shenzhou You try to use increase in population as argument against the death tool. I would not use that as strong argument" What strong argument have you presented at all? You brought up Mao's Four Pests Campaign, but you don't even know the number of sparrows in China at that time, which already reduces your argument to just speculation without concrete facts. Whereas I've been consistently providing statistics, showing that China's population actually increased during the Great Leap Forward, which calls into question the exaggerated death toll of 30 million that you claimed. You said: "nor does the increase in number of people equal *standard of living increase.*" But China's standard of living did increase under Mao. For example, China's growth in life expectancy at birth from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al. 1984; Coale1984; Jamison 1984; Banister 1987; Ravallion 1997; Banister and Hill 2004). Source: An exploration of China's mortality decline under Mao - NCBI ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4331212/ You said: "Furthermore, after Mao died, China was economically it bad shape, and it was not the Mao economics that gave economic boost to China," China's GDP actually increased under Mao, growing from just $30.55 billion (USD) in 1952 to $306 billion in 1980, so how was China economically in bad shape, when China's GDP increased tenfold? Here's a graph of China's GDP growth from 1953 to 1980 China's GDP from 1953 to 1980 1952: $30.55 billion 1953: $31.66 billion 1954: $33.02 billion 1955: $35.01 billion 1956: $39.58 billion ... 1976: $153.94 billion 1977: $174.94 billion 1978: $218.50 billion 1979: $263.70 billion 1980: $306.17 billion ... Source: Historical GDP of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_GDP_of_China
    1
  21544.  @flickingbollocks5542  Former Chancellor Merkel was Germany's longest serving chancellor and she would have probably served for life if she didn't withdraw her candidacy for the next German election. Likewise, Shinzo Abe was Japan's longest serving PM, and he would have probably served for life he didn't had to withdraw due to medical issues. But does that mean German and Japan aren't democratic?
    1
  21545.  @KrunoslavStifter  We've been talking for a while now, and you've been constantly insinuating that I've been brainwashed by communist propaganda. But I've cited data and statistics from Western sources and articles to support my argument. Whereas from your words, it appears that you're simply full of hate for Mao, for Stalin and for communism then it makes me wonder who is truly brainwashed here. It's tragic that Soviet Union suffered the most casualties of WWI, but they were up against Nazi Germany (an advanced capitalist country) yet the Soviet's inflicted the most damage onto the enemy during WWII. Yet your logic is about blaming communism and the Soviet Union, implying that he's a paranoid psychopath? It's like your arguments are based off emotions, not logic, especially when you continually quote anti-Communist statements made by others.
    1
  21546.  @KrunoslavStifter  We've been talking for a while now, and you've been constantly insinuating that I've been brainwashed by communist propaganda. But I've cited data and statistics from Western sources and articles to support my argument. Whereas from your words, it appears that you're simply full of hate for Mao, for Stalin and for communism then it makes me wonder who is truly brainwashed here. The Soviet Union suffered the most casualties of WWII because they were up against an advanced capitalist country like Germany, yet the Soviet still managed to inflict the most damage onto the enemy. Yet your argument about blaming communism seems to be based off emotions, not logic. Is that why you've repeated quoted anti-communist statements made by others?
    1
  21547.  @KrunoslavStifter  We've been talking for a while now, and you've been constantly insinuating that I've been brainwashed by communist propaganda. But I've cited data and statistics from Western sources and articles to support my argument. Whereas from your words, it appears that you're simply full of hate for Mao, for Stalin and for communism then it makes me wonder who is truly brainwashed here.
    1
  21548.  @KrunoslavStifter  You said: "First of all Stalin and Hitler made a pack and used it to divide and carve up parts of the Europe." There's a lot of context to the pact. The purpose of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was for both Germany and the Soviet Union to get a common border with each other, so that they'll know not to step on each other's toes. For the Soviets, the pact meant that Germany would have to direct their attention Westward, and in Germany's case, it also meant that they wouldn't have to worry about a backstab by the Soviet later. But eventually the attack did came after Hitler broke the deal like you said. You said: "When Hitler decided to break the deal and invade Soviet Union it took a while for Stalin to even react." Because the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union (i.e (Operation Barbarossa)_ did not succeed in capturing Soviet Union territory, despite the massive losses suffered by the Red Army at that time. So Stalin saw no need to invade Germany territory just because Soviet territory was invaded, what purpose would it achieve for Soviet Union? You said: "The Reason Soviet Union lost so many people is not soly because of the might of Nazi machine, its because it took Stalin a while before he reacted to the start of invasion.." It took Stalin awhile because he believed that the Soviet military was simply not ready to take on the German forces. The massive losses of the Red Army during Operation Barbarossa helped reinforced this believe that Stalin needed to buy time before the Soviet army was ready to take on the Germans. You said: "and it also was linked to the fact that Soviets were ready to send as many many it took into the war machine." That's what happens when your army is clearly unprepared to take on a more advanced Germany army. The Soviet Union knew it was out of time to prepare, so Stalin had to send whatever he could (and in this case, mostly soldiers) to fight against the Germans. You said: "As for paranoid psychopath, Stalin?" If he were paranoid psychopath, why didn't he attack Germany straightaway? Instead, he was relunctant to engage the Germans because he thought his army was not ready for war with Germany.
    1
  21549.  @KrunoslavStifter  You said: "Its classic communism, my friend. Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past...." ― George Orwell, 1984" It's astonishing that of all sources, you choose to quote lines off a work of fiction to support you argument. Writers of such fiction deliberately exaggerate the negative aspects of certain ideologies for entertainment purposes in order to attract a large readership to their novels. But what happens in fiction is not necessarily what happens in real life, so what's the point of you quoting George Orwell's 1984? If anything, it just adds credence to the possibility of you being brainwashed Western anti-communist propaganda. I actually quote actual data and statistics to support my arguments, whereas you support yours off quotes from works of fiction? You said: "Why do you think Mao had cultural revolution ,besides to get rid of his political rivals." There are many reasons for the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, one which is that Deng's economic reforms have allowed some of the ills of capitalism like corruption to seep into and taint the communist party. Another aspect was to get rid of certain Chinese traditions that were frankly hindering China's progress. For example, during the Cultural Revolution, peasants in the rural countryside were granted greater access education. Many women too received an education (Mao's famous saying was that "Women hold up half the Sky" 妇女能顶半边天。) and practices like the binding of feet stopped. Women also featured prominently working alongside their male colleagues during the Cultural Revolution. You said: "The cultural revolution was specifically done to destroy the past by young brainwashed little red generals so he can install new version of history and present and future in which the party" There are some Chinese idoms like 破舊立新 (break the old before you build the new) and 不破不立 (You can’t build the new if you don’t break the old). This is evident throughout China's long history as well, as the pioneers of almost every dynasty would dedicate themselves into destroying the culture from the previous dynasty. That's how even Dr Sun Zhongshan and the Nationalist Kuomintang came to power in China by overthrowing the previous Qing Dynasty.
    1
  21550.  @KrunoslavStifter  You said: "Mao was responsible for well over 70 million deaths in peacetime," 70 million seems to be if anything, a bloated death toll, but where do those writers get their information from? China's population at that time was around 600 million, so you're telling me that Mao was responsible for a death toll amounting to around 12% of China's population at that time? Then why is it that under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979? Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Historical_population You said: "Chang and Halliday write that this period (Great Leap Forward) accounts for roughly half of the 70 million total.... places the death toll for the Great Leap Forward at 45 million, and describes it as "one of the most deadly mass killings of human history." But we've already shown that Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine, caused by bad weather conditions like the 1958 Yellow River Flood, causing destruction of crops and resulted in mass starvation. Yet in the West, it's because described as a "deadly mass killing of human history" when it's apparent those people starved to death? Then how can you attribute it to murder when the intention to kill was not there? Also, your book says that 45 million died during the Great Leap Forward (1958-1961) but but if we look at China's population statistics, China's population in was 612,241,552 in 1955 and by 1960, China's population actually increased to 660,408,054, having actually increased by 48,166,502 in just 5 years. Population of China from 1950-1965 1950: 554,419,268 1955: 612,241,552 (Great Leap Forward 1958-1961) 1960: 660,408,054 (Great Leap Forward 1958-1961) 1965: 724,218,970 ... Source: populationpyramid.net/china/1955/ So your book is saying that China's population decreased by 45 million during the Great Leap Forward (1958-1961), yet the statistics from 1955-1960 show that China's population further increased by 48 million?
    1
  21551.  @KrunoslavStifter "Mao was responsible for well over 70 million deaths in peacetime," 70 million seems to be if anything, a bloated death toll, but where do those writers get their information from? China's population at that time was around 600 million, so you're telling me that Mao was responsible for a death toll amounting to around 12% of China's population at that time? Then why is it that under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979? wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Historical_population You said: "Chang and Halliday write that this period (Great Leap Forward) accounts for roughly half of the 70 million total.... places the death toll for the Great Leap Forward at 45 million, and describes it as "one of the most deadly mass killings of human history." But we've already shown that Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine, caused by bad weather conditions like the 1958 Yellow River Flood, causing destruction of crops and resulted in mass starvation. Yet in the West, it's because described as a "deadly mass killing of human history" when it's apparent those people starved to death? Then how can you attribute it to murder when the intention to kill was not there? Also, your book says that 45 million died during the Great Leap Forward (1958-1961) but but if we look at China's population statistics, China's population in was 612,241,552 in 1955 and by 1960, China's population actually increased to 660,408,054, having actually increased by 48,166,502 in just 5 years. Population of China from 1950-1965 1950: 554,419,268 1955: 612,241,552 (Great Leap Forward 1958-1961) 1960: 660,408,054 (Great Leap Forward 1958-1961) 1965: 724,218,970 ... Source: populationpyramid.net/china/1955/ So your book is saying that China's population decreased by 45 million during the Great Leap Forward (1958-1961), yet the statistics from 1955-1960 show that China's population further increased by 48 million?
    1
  21552.  @KrunoslavStifter  You said: "Mao was responsible for well over 70 million deaths in peacetime," 70 million seems to be if anything, a bloated death toll, but where do those writers get their information from? China's population at that time was around 600 million, so you're telling me that Mao was responsible for a death toll amounting to around 12% of China's population at that time? Then why is it that under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979? You said: "Chang and Halliday write that this period (Great Leap Forward) accounts for roughly half of the 70 million total.... places the death toll for the Great Leap Forward at 45 million, and describes it as "one of the most deadly mass killings of human history." But we've already shown that Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine, caused by bad weather conditions like the 1958 Yellow River Flood, causing destruction of crops and resulted in mass starvation. Yet in the West, it's because described as a "deadly mass killing of human history" when it's apparent those people starved to death? Then how can you attribute it to murder when the intention to kill was not there? Also, your book says that 45 million died during the Great Leap Forward (1958-1961) But if you If you search "China's Population 1955," Google gives 605 million people If you search "China's Population 1960," Google gives 667 million people So your book is saying that China's population decreased by 45 million during the Great Leap Forward (1958-1961), yet the statistics from 1955-1960 show that China's population further increased by 62 million?
    1
  21553.  @KrunoslavStifter  70 million seems to be if anything, a bloated death toll, but where do those writers get their information from? China's population at that time was around 600 million, so you're telling me that Mao was responsible for a death toll amounting to around 12% of China's population at that time? Then why is it that under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979? You said: "Chang and Halliday write that this period (Great Leap Forward) accounts for roughly half of the 70 million total.... places the death toll for the Great Leap Forward at 45 million, and describes it as "one of the most deadly mass killings of human history." But we've already shown that Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine, caused by bad weather conditions like the 1958 Yellow River Flood, causing destruction of crops and resulted in mass starvation. Yet in the West, it's because described as a "deadly mass killing of human history" when it's apparent those people starved to death? Then how can you attribute it to murder when the intention to kill was not there? Also, your book says that 45 million died during the Great Leap Forward (1958-1961) But if you If you search "China's Population 1955," Google gives 605 million people If you search "China's Population 1960," Google gives 667 million people So your book is saying that China's population decreased by 45 million during the Great Leap Forward (1958-1961), yet the statistics from 1955-1960 show that China's population further increased by 62 million?
    1
  21554.  @KrunoslavStifter  ​You said: "Mao was responsible for well over 70 million deaths in peacetime," 70 million seems to be if anything, a bloated death toll, but where do those writers get their information from? China's population at that time was around 600 million, so you're telling me that Mao was responsible for a death toll amounting to around 12% of China's population at that time? Then why is it that under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979? Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Historical_population
    1
  21555.  @KrunoslavStifter  You said: "Mao was responsible for well over 70 million deaths in peacetime," 70 million deaths? China's population at that time was around 600 million, so you're telling me that Mao was responsible for a death toll amounting to around 12% of China's population at that time? Then why is it that under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979? Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Historical_population You said: "Chang and Halliday write that this period (Great Leap Forward) accounts for roughly half of the 70 million total.... places the death toll for the Great Leap Forward at 45 million, and describes it as "one of the most deadly mass killings of human history." But we've already shown that Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine, caused by bad weather conditions like the 1958 Yellow River Flood, causing destruction of crops and resulted in mass starvation. Yet in the West, it's because described as a "deadly mass killing of human history" when it's apparent those people starved to death? Then how can you attribute it to murder when the intention to kill was not there? Also, your book says that 45 million died during the Great Leap Forward (1958-1961) but but if we look at China's population statistics, China's population in was 612,241,552 in 1955 and by 1960, China's population actually increased to 660,408,054, having actually increased by 48,166,502 in just 5 years. Population of China from 1950-1965 1950: 554,419,268 1955: 612,241,552 (Great Leap Forward 1958-1961) 1960: 660,408,054 (Great Leap Forward 1958-1961) 1965: 724,218,970 ... Source: populationpyramid.net/china/1955/ So your book is saying that China's population decreased by 45 million during the Great Leap Forward (1958-1961), yet the statistics from 1955-1960 show that China's population further increased by 48 million?
    1
  21556.  @KrunoslavStifter  You: "I wonder what the Poles had to say about that. Invaded, enslaved, murdered by the millions in extermination camps." It's an irony today that Poland now supports Ukraine despite the Nazi collaborators like Stepan Bandera that's much worshiped in Ukraine today. I suggest watching the Oliver Stone's documentary: Ukraine on Fire to witness how the sees of Nazism were planted in Ukraine and grew to become the conflict today. You said: "If you read history that is on the record, you would also know" Hindsight is 20/20, just because you know something now, doesn't necessarily mean that the leaders know what the other is thinking back during the signing of the pact. You said: "And Soviets were his target from the start. He simply used deception." Well, then you're correct that the Soviets were duped by Hitler's deception, and were another victim of the Nazi's deceptive policies like you claim. Then that doesn't explain the immense hatred you feel for Soviets, given that not only did they suffer the most casualities of WWII, but they also inflicted the most damage on the Nazis, isn't it? You said: "He was a paranoid psychopath as I've pointed you to a book" Have you considered that perhaps that book is biased against Stalin to depict him as such? Afterall ,there exists such a thing as Western anti-communist propanganda, which you seem to quote again and again. The fact that Stalin felt that the Soviet Union was unprepared to face off against the Germans goes to prove that Stalin had rational, pragmatic thinking, not a psychopath like you claimed. Also, you earlier you said: "There are other methods of fighting war you know." but this just seems like your typical criticism of communist, claiming "there are other methods". The fact is there was no other method, the Soviet Union was not prepared to take on the more advanced German Army (that's why the Red Army suffered immense losses) yet despite being unprepared, they still managed to inflict the most damage onto the Germans during WWII. So what "other methods" are you talking if they didn't do as much damage as the Soviet Union did to Germany?
    1
  21557.  @KrunoslavStifter  And I still find it astonishing that you continually refer again and again to what's clearly a work of fiction to somehow support your argument against communism. Works of fiction are written by authors for entertainment, so they may deliberately exaggerate negative outcomes in order to attract readership to their titles. What occurred in their novels may not necessarily reflect reality, but it appears that you're unable to distinguish between fiction and reality. You said: "We can read real accounts and see the actions of communist regimes." Yes, we should be looking at real actions of communist countries, not quoting some work of fiction and taking it to be reality. Even fiction that's based on a true story is still fiction, and the writer may have deliberately removed flaws (or introduce flaws) in order to shape the reader's perception towards a particular subject. But that does not mean what happens in fiction is reflected in reality. Because the authors have edited the scenarios to introduce the maximum entertainment value. If you want to look at the actions of communist countries, I've already shown how the communists transform pre-1917 Russia from a technologically backward society into the economic and military power that is the Soviet Union. Communists have transformed what was once arguably Europe's poorest country into its strongest, so much that even NATO countries continue to fear the former Soviet Union, and this stands as a testament as to the power of this ideology.
    1
  21558.  @KrunoslavStifter  I really find it more and more difficult to take you seriously, when it appears that you have problems differentiating fiction from reality. Works of fiction can serve as thought experiments and hypothetical examples of what could happen if we follow down this path, take this action, etc, but we need to make a clear distinction that the story's events are fictitious, and do not necessarily reflect the reality on the ground. In fact, it may even be conceived that such works of fiction serve as propaganda, in order to instill a sense of fear towards a particular subject (in this case, communism) and inflating negative scenarios in order to demonize the topic to its readers. If anything, you continuing to quote the work of fiction as evidence will add credence to the possibility that you are brainwashed to hate Stalin, hate Mao and hate communism.
    1
  21559.  @KrunoslavStifter  "Putin is not Stalin and Russia is not Soviet Union." The irony is that in Poland it's gotten so bad to the point where they are against the Russians, who were the ones who suffered the most casualties fighting against Nazi Germany and as inflicted the most damage upon them while as the Soviet Union. You said: "Stalin and Hitler were not men of high moral character. They were paranoid psychopaths." How is it that you cannot even seem to take your own advice? The fact that Stalin was reluctant to fight the Germans after the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union because he thought the Soviet army was woefully unprepared, shows that he at least cared about his people. Sending his troops to fight the Nazis was an act of desperation after realizing that he wasn't buying time by not attacking the Nazis. In April 2019, a Levada center poll revealed that 70% of Russians approve of Stalin's role in Russian history, the highest ever recorded, and that 51% viewed Stalin in a positive light. You said: "But lets not excuse one totalitarian murders regime because it fought its rival." The thing is that the Soviet Union were the ones who saved the world from Hitler, it's not just a trivial matter of fighting a rival. And the point that you attributed the deaths of 20 million as somehow being the fault of Stalin and communism just goes to show how much you refuse to think logically and instead act emotionally.
    1
  21560.  @KrunoslavStifter  "This, apparently, despite the fact that both movements were notoriously anti-intellectual." Anti-intellectual? Hitler's Nazi engineers made technological developments which were innovative and far ahead of their time, manufacturing weapons such as sonic cannons, x-ray guns and land cruisers. The famous Volkswagen Beetle was commissioned by Hitler in the 1930s as the “peoples car”, designed as a practical, affordable car for German families. Anti-ship missiles were first developed in Nazi Germany during WWII, the effectiveness of anti-ship missiles against Allied vessels in 1943-1944 prompted other countries to develop their own. The V2 Rocket was a German designed rocket that was eventually repurposed by USA and the USSR and used to launch satellites and spacecraft into orbit. Likewise, the Soviet Union made numerous technological advancements during its time. On October 4, 1957, the Soviet Union launched the world's first artificial satellite, Sputnik-1 into space. The launch grabbed the world’s attention because it was at the height of the Cold War. Video: The Sputnik 1 Launch: The First Artificial Satellite To Enter Earth's Orbit youtu.be/g2WaJdflqT0 You said: "Most founders of ideologies spend remarkably little time in trying to establish the truth of the empirical and logical components of their belief systems." I agree and frankly speaking, this is the best course of action. While theory is important yes, in my opinion, the practical results are what sells the ideology itself and makes it more palatable for people to accept this ideology. And the fact remains that the communists transform what was arguably once Europe's poorest country into its strongest as the Soviet Union, both economically as well as militarily. That's why NATO was formed in response to Soviet Union's rising military might, and the Soviet Union was also the world's 2nd largest economy from 1960-1985. To me, it's the results of an ideology that count far more than the founder's ability to establish their belief system.
    1
  21561.  @KrunoslavStifter  "神州 Shenzhou Hardly. Where you take communist propaganda which is lie hidden inside fiction seriously," Excuse me, but did I ever quoted any works of fiction here? Whereas George Orwell's 1984 is clearly a work of fiction which means that it was crafted for entertainment purposes. The author deliberate frames scenarios inside the book in such a controversial way so as to provoke discussion and attract readership, and in some cases, the reader may misinterpret certain things and arrive at a conclusion that's entirely different from what the author intended. But ultimately, with all works of fiction, it is not necessarily representative of reality. But people like you have difficulty distinguishing works of fiction from reality, so much that you seem to think quoting a work of fiction will actually support your argument. Who is the one truly brainwashed here? Instead of relying on data, statistics and logic like me, you've chosen to live in a world of fiction that's all.
    1
  21562.  @KrunoslavStifter  I know not of any professor who would take you seriously if during an exam, you choose to quote a work of fiction like George Orwell's 1984 as a source to describe the actual history of the Soviet Union. Even literature professors know the difference between works of fiction and reality.
    1
  21563.  @KrunoslavStifter  "Indirectly, you have perpetuated the myth of Mao," So it appears you cannot even answer my question of which work of fiction did I quote, even after you accused me of quoting works of fiction. Instead, you constantly quote the work of fiction that is George Orwell's 1984 as somehow being representative of communism, when it's apparent that the author wrote the novel for entertainment purposes, and deliberately exaggerated the negative scenario in order to appeal to readers and attract readership. You said: "that is not truthful and unlike Orwell's writing it is not representation of something inside a fiction. It is a propaganda. That is the intent and purpose of it." How is this so-called "Myth of Mao" that you accused me of quoting as a work of fiction, not even truthful? I gave actual data and statistics, showing that under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. China's Life Expectancy at birth under Mao nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al. 1984; Coale1984; Jamison 1984; Banister 1987; Ravallion 1997; Banister and Hill 2004). Infant mortality rate in China under Mao plummeted from 195 per thousand in 1950 to just 55 per thousand in 1980. Adult illiteracy rate also nearly halved under Mao. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%. Sources: An exploration of China's mortality decline under Mao: A provincial analysis, 1950–80 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4331212/ ‘The Single Greatest Educational Effort in Human History’ languagemagazine.com/the-single-greatest-educational-effort-in-human-history/ What "Myth of Mao" are you talking about when I quoted actual data and statistics? Whereas you go on and on about George Orwell's 1984 when it's all a work of fiction that's all. You said: "But myth of Mao is not about moral teachings, its about total control over the population for benefits of smaller minority, relatively speaking." What smaller minority? When Mao came to power, he seized the lands from the rich corrupt landlords and then redistributed it to the dirt-poor peasants (which formed the majority of China's population at that time). For the first time in centuries, many peasants found themselves freed of having to pay crippling taxes to landlords for the lands they worked on, and that's why everyone in China have our own laojia (老家) to return to. You said: "Last one happened when Xi came to power. Under "fighting corruption" excuse off course, he purged quite a few party members." Corruption is a universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But under Xi, there are anti-corruption campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. More than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption including over 120 high-ranking officials, including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders. Source: Anti-corruption campaign under Xi Jinping wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-corruption_campaign_under_Xi_Jinping But when is the last time a country like the USA had an anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hilary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his presidential campaign. But after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    1
  21564.  @KrunoslavStifter  You said: "The characters and locations are work of fiction, but they symbolize actual regimes and his book was written as a warning for others, manual for some, definitely not as pure entertainment." Symbolizing actual regimes doesn't necessarily mean that the actual events happened as was unfolded in the story, the author takes an artistic license to his portrayal and exaggerate certain aspects in order to entertain readers and attract readership to his novel. That's the point of differentiation between reality and fiction. The allegations of 1984's material being a "warning for others, manual for some" is again just artistic interpretation of a work of fiction that's designed for entertainment. What "warning" is there to be given, when the material does not reflect actual reality? What sort of "manual" is it that has no instructions on it? You said: "What is the intent of a work of fiction?" Go ahead and search for the answer to your question, you'll find out the main purpose of fiction is to entertain. Fiction is *any story made up by an author. *It is a creation of the author's imagination. It is not based strictly on history or facts. The opposite of fiction is non-fiction, writing that deals with facts and true events. You said: "Dystopian literature such as Brave New World by Aldous Huxley (1932) and Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell (1948)" More works of fiction by George Orwell; stories made up in the mind of an author that aren't strictly based on history or facts. You said: "You may think of it as fiction, many looking around see it as reality and those in power, might as well see it as manual." That's because it is fiction, not reality, and certainly no manual given the sheer lack of instructions on such works of fiction. Have you actually read an actual manual for yourself? An actual manual is nothing like fiction, it's filled with instructions, troubleshooting tips, maintenance procedures and whatnot, and it's certainly not as entertaining as works of fiction. You said: "Only psychotics might see it as entertainment." So you're implying that readers of George Orwell's novels who picked up the book because they find it interesting or intriguing, are possible psychotics themselves? You said: "Your read the western or on the other end CCP propaganda and you might as well be reading 1984 or history book." 1984 is a work of fiction and shouldn't even be grouped together with an actual history book. Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia are fictional superstates in the novel that did not exist throughout actual world history.
    1
  21565.  @KrunoslavStifter  I've already gave previous examples of how Stalin cared for his people, even Mao Zedong clearly cared about China which is why he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. Look at what you wrote previous about Mao, you can see that his intentions was to strengthen China though industrialization, self-sustainability and development. Every move that Mao made had an objective that will benefit China in some way or another, then how can you classify such people as psychopaths because of a book? Speaking of books, I still don't get why you claim that the Soviet Union was "notoriously anti-intellectual" when the Soviet Union literally made numerous advances in science and technology during its heyday. Not only did the Soviet Union launched the world's first artificial satellite (Sputnik-1) into orbit, but they also invented the spacesuit and the first human in space was Soviet Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin. On April 12, 1961, Soviet cosmonaut, Yuri Gagarin, made history at the age of 27 by completing a single orbit of Earth in approximately 108 minutes. After more than 50 years, Gagarin’s journey is still regarded as a key moment in space history that paved the way for all future space endeavors that followed. Video: Yuri Gagarin Became The First Human In Space, 57 Years Ago Today youtu.be/vkVAqNbX0Nw There's many examples of Soviet inventions and innovation while under the communists, I really don't get why you claim the Soviet Union was notoriously anti-intellectual. How did pre-1917 Russia transformed from being arguably Europe's poorest country into it's strongest as the Soviet Union if it didn't have innovation?
    1
  21566.  @KrunoslavStifter  I just typed a search entry for "What is the purpose of fiction?" and Google's answer is the purpose of fiction is to entertain. If you look up Wikipedia: Fiction it is described as any creative work, chiefly any narrative work, portraying individuals, events, or places in ways that are imaginary or inconsistent with history, fact, or plausibility. The opposite of fiction is non-fiction, writing that deals with facts and true events. So I find it astonishing how you can continually use George Orwell's 1984 (clearly a work of fiction) as an argument against communism and continue to do so. Like I said, I know not of any professor who would take you seriously if during an exam, you choose to quote a work of fiction like George Orwell's 1984 as a source to describe the actual history of the Soviet Union. You said: "And fiction that is done for entertimant in mind as main purpose, is fairly recent development." As recent as in 1949 when George Orwell's 1984 was published? Then we are in agreement that George Orwell's novel is clearly a work of fiction meant for entertainment purposes. I mean, even the date 1984 has come and passed, and the events described in the novel did not come to pass. You said: "Are you suggesting propaganda posters during Mao or Stalin era is mainly for entertainment." Propaganda posters aren't classified as works of fiction if the events depicted do indeed occur in reality. And what we do know is that during the Cultural Revolution, women were granted equal access to education as their male counterparts, and made up a significant portion of the revolutionary front. As for Stalin's propaganda posters, the fact remains that the communist transformed pre-1917 Russia from arguably Europe's poorest country into its strongest as the Soviet Union, both economically as well as militarily. Polls in Russia have revealed that the most common feeling toward Stalin was respect (41% of all Russians). Over 51% had positive feelings toward Stalin (respect, admiration, sympathy) and it goes to show that Stalin did indeed make the Soviet Union into a power like no other. You said: "I could point out myths in the communist regimes" All I asked, is that you point out a work of fiction that I quoted after you've accused me of such, yet it's apparent that you're unable to do so. Because I never quoted any work of fiction. You said: "Christian Bible is full of mythology... Even Hollywood movies... movies like Rambo III or Independence Day are great entertainment, but behind that lies political propaganda... Orwell's book is not entertainment," So you've admitted that works of fiction have been used as propaganda, then wouldn't you say that Orwell's novel is propaganda as well? Specifically anti-communist propaganda? Why do you just blindly buy into the writings of a work of fiction when it's apparent that the events within are not necessarily reflective of reality?
    1
  21567.  @KrunoslavStifter  You said: "The Great Mao and Stalin the leaders of the people for the people by the people. Hmmm." In April 2019, a Levada center poll revealed that 70% of Russians approve of Stalin's role in Russian history, the highest ever recorded, and that 51% viewed Stalin in a positive light. Likewise, most Chinese believe Mao Zedong is is a great person with “70% achievements+ 30% faults”. Chairman Mao seized lands from the rich landlords and redistributed the land to the peasants. Instead of having to pay taxes to landlords for lands they worked on, the peasants actually owned the land for once. Mao Zedong succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country, where the previous KMT administration failed for 37 years. I cannot stress the enormity of this task. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would most likely be weak and divided, with warlords ruling over us, instead of the strong unified country we are today. But it seems like you rather believe Stalin and Mao are paranoid psychopaths based off some book, rather than look at the achievements made by the communists in both countries. You said: "The development of new technology does not mean anti intellectual, but questioning the purpose of usage and development of such technology, if it goes against the official narrative will be hostile to the intellectual though." So are you saying that development of mass surveillance, censorship programs, advanced facial recognition software being used to spy on population is hostile to the intellectual, even in Western countries? Then virtually all countries have a degree of anti-intellectualism to them. You said: "When Chinese civilization invented gun powder, clearly that was not limiting technological advancements. But could you have been equally celebrated if you questioned the legitimacy of the Middle Kingdom and rule of the Emperor?" That's a very contextual situation. Despite the authority of the Emperor, there have been rebellions by ordinary people that have successfully overthrown emperors in China, and Chinese history is littered with rebellions that were the downfall of tyrant emperors. Intrinsic to a ruler's right to rule China, is also the right of rebellion by people, if the emperor does not perform up to Heaven's standard. This is known as the Mandate of Heaven (天命) where a competent ruler is allowed to continue ruling China if he/she successfully quells rebellion, while an incompetent ruler will eventually be overthrown by rebellion, with either outcome being considered "Heaven's Will" according to this Chinese political philosophy. Source: Wikipedia: Mandate of Heaven wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandate_of_Heaven So to answer you question, if you questioned the legitimacy of the Emperor, but succeeded in a revolt to overthrow the ruler, then you would actually be celebrated as having earned the Mandate of Heaven, and you could become Emperor yourself.
    1
  21568.  @KrunoslavStifter  You said: "During Stalin reign or Mao reign some technological advancements happened and some did not." Not only did the Soviet's launched the world's first artificial satellite (Sputnik-1) and that the first man in space was Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, but the Soviets also launched the world's first space station, Salyut-1 into orbit in 1971. Video: 50 Years Ago The First Space Station Launched - Salyut 1 youtu.be/Ju6rmFm1_9M You said: "Because of central planing and push to serve the party." Where you get the idea that communist ideology is to serve the party? If communists were really about holding onto power, then why is it communists fight for the powerless? Communists fight for the weak, the starving, the homeless, the jobless, the illiterate, and for those unable to fight for themselves. Instead of serving the party, communists fight primarily to serve the people. Like all those plans made by Stalin and Mao, you think it's purpose to consolidate power? If that were really the case, why did Mao propose the Great Leap Forward to transform China from an agricultural country into an industrialized nation? Wouldn't it be better to leave China a dirt-poor agricultural country if Mao was only interested in holding onto power? Why did Mao want to increase crop yields, increase steel production, and all those developments if Mao was only interested in holding onto power? Because communist ideology is all about serving the people and freeing China from Western imperialism. You said: "Five year plan? Terrible idea." China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long-term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. Whereas in the United States for example, the U.S Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years once they've reached the end of their term limits. This means that the presidents can only make short-term plans for America's future, instead of long-term plans, spanning say 10 years or more. So I'm not so sure why you seem to think the term five year plan is a terrible idea in and of itself. Even till today, China makes use of such 5-year plans to map out our future and gauge our progress over the long-term.
    1
  21569.  @KrunoslavStifter  What's the point of quoting anti-communist poetry from David Benioff's City of Thieves? That's another work of fiction just like George Orwell's 1984, so once again, I am astonished that you can quote works of fiction as arguments against communism, while seemingly ignoring the basic facts on the ground. You said: "The enterprise manager would be rewarded for meeting the targets or punished for failing to meet the objective." Same with most business models, if your manager fails to meet the objective, he may get demoted, or sacked, or take a pay cut. You said: "For example, if a turbine enterprise manager was given a target of 100 turbines for the month, the incentive would be to produce the smallest turbines possible, even if larger ones were needed." The same could be said of capitalism, where companies may strive to use the least amount of material to incur the least costs to their company. Both capitalism and communism seek to meet market demands, except that capitalism does so in pursuit of profit. You said: "If they tried new techniques of production that might possibly be more efficient—and if the new approach failed—then they could lose their jobs." Every new venture carries with it a certain amount of risk of failure. Even in the West, if your venture fails, you may lose your job just as well, and might even end up bankrupted, whereas in the Soviet Union, managers seek to hire as many workers as possible (like you said earlier). You said: "One of the chief criticisms of the Soviet economy was its lack of innovation—in terms of production methods and in range of new products" Soviet Union's GDP was the world's 2nd largest during its heyday from 1960 - 1985. The Soviets invented and launched the world's first artificial satellite, Sputnik-1 and the first man in space was Soviet Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin. The Soviet's launched the world's first spacestation Salyut-1 into orbit, and they've also made numerous advances in nuclear technology. On June 27, 1954, the world's first nuclear power station to generate electricity for a power grid, the Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant, commenced operations in Obninsk, in the Soviet Union. You said: "The typical Soviet manager was not focused on minimizing costs or maximizing sales revenues." Yes, because communism is not primarily about the pursuit of profits, it's about making sure that nobody gets left behind. Whereas capitalism takes steps such as shrinking workers wages in order to skim off a wider profit margin for themselves. You said: "Full employment didn’t mean efficient use of labor, of course. Often, enterprises would employ workers who didn’t do anything but were around in case production needed to be increased quickly to meet the target as the month came to a close." On the other hand, workers get to rest and even rotate shifts with other workers who were on standby. And when the time came to rush to meet the target, companies often had sufficient workers. Full employment also means less likely that jobless people would start to gather and protest Whereas in capitalist countries, employers want to increase profits by hiring the minimum number of workers, many of who, are expected to work overtime (sometimes without extra pay) during peak periods. And if you ask those workers, sometimes the extra pay is not worth it, when there is shortage of staff to bear the workload. You said: "This practice of feverishly rushing to meet the target at the end of each month was called storming," Storming was primarily caused by the required materials and tools not being available on time, and the workers often use this time to do something else. It wasn't caused by having too many workers. You said: "Afterward, the workers might need to rest a bit at the beginning of the next month. And if they rest too long, they will need to storm again." This meant that workers get more leisure time to recover, whereas frantically overworked employees in capitalist countries often don't get to, even after they worked overtime just because their employer wants to extract a larger profit margin for themselves by hiring the minimum number of employees. The result is the mental breakdown of many employees after years of working overtime with not enough rest.
    1
  21570.  @KrunoslavStifter  "神州 Shenzhou Either Goggle is wrong or you ignored the parts you didn't like." Or perhaps you simply cannot accept the fact that the primary purpose of fiction is to entertain, and that the events contain within works of fiction are there to entertain and attract readership to the novels, and not necessarily reflective of reality. The problem is when you try and confuse fiction with reality as what you're doing. You said: "And that is not what we are talking about here and you know it." We are talking about reality versus fiction. I've repeatedly cited real data and statistics to prove my point whereas you've been using works of fictions like George Orwell's 1984 and David Benioff's City of Thieves to argue against communism. The opposite of fiction is non-fiction, writing that deals with facts and true events. That is what we are dealing with. You said: "Its not rocket science. For god sake. " Even basic science and common sense tells us not to confuse fiction with reality, yet it seems you don't even have the fundamentals down. You said: "No, its not anti-communist propaganda. Its revelation of communist propaganda." Why can you say with confidence that Orwell's 1984 is not anti-communist propaganda? After reading the novel, you might develop anti-communist sentiment, even though the events featured in the novel are fictional and could have been negatively exaggerated in order to create such an impression. You said: "That is the point of the novel. To show how communist style system works , regardless of time and place." But it is ultimately work of fiction, it doesn't mean reality will follow as the author predicted in his novel. It's absurd to think that a work of fiction can somehow be justified as evidence against communism, which professor or scientist would take you seriously if during an exam, you use Orwell's novel as a source to describe the actual history of the Soviet Union? You said: "The principle methods and mindset of communists do not change ...Because communist mindset does not change..." Countries proclaiming to be communist have arguably undergone perhaps the greatest change in recent history, most notably China and Russia. The Marxist philosophy of dialectical materialism proposes the resolution of contradictions (arguments) through real-world conditions (facts). A thesis is initially conceived which then encounters a contradiction, an antithesis which would push and pull against each other, eventually coming to a compromise, a synthesis. Later, that synthesis becomes a new thesis, which encounters an antithesis and the whole cycle repeats itself. You said: "If you want to be efficient communist you would use his novel as a manual" Seems like you don't even understand what a manual is. What instructions are present inside Orwell's novel, you tell me? There's nothing in the novel about seizing the means of production, nothing about the abolition of private property, nothing about class struggle, nothing about the revolution, and certainly nothing about the wrongdoings of the imperialists. It’s a work by a faux socialist to strawman Stalin’s entire cause without any unaltered evidence. You said: "I've covered this in details, you chose to ignore the inconvenient truth that does not fit the narrative." I've cited data and statistics, and it appears that because it doesn't fit your anti-communist narrative, you choose to ignore the inconvenient truth here. Instead you just believe Orwell's novels are not anti-communist propaganda, even though most likely that work of fiction has imparted negative feelings towards communism in your mind, without much of a basis in reality. You said: "You don't understand why it happened and you ignore the disproportional cost and alternative methods of achieving the same thing." I've responded on the so-called "disproportional cost" of 20 million dying during WWII as because the Stalin thought the Soviet Army was not prepared to receive the Nazi invaders. I mean, do you blame the rest of the Allies for the deaths they suffered during WWII? And you keep on bringing up alternative methods but do you actually have evidence that such alternative methods would have achieved the same thing? Would the Soviet Union under your alternative methods achieve the same thing of inflicting the most damage onto the Germans during WWII? Otherwise it's just speculation that's all. You said: "To take full advantage of the interpreting the data correctly we often need experience. "Information is pretty thin stuff unless mixed with experience. Something you have not shown." And the people with the most experience being under the Soviet Union are the Russians themselves, yet why do you distrust what the survey says about Russian's positive feeling Stalin? Aren't they the ones who've experienced living under him? You said: "Its called confirmation bias and you have not protected yourself from it." Says the one constantly quoting works of fiction and anti-communist poetry, without actual statistical data to back them up. You said: "Scientific approach is about looking at statistics and adjusting your assumptions according to what they reveal to you." Yes, that describes what I am doing, looking at statistics that the communists transformed pre-1917 Russia from arguably Europe's poorest country into its strongest as the Soviet Union, and making numerous advances in science and technology such as launching Sputnik-1, Yuri Gagrin, Salyut-1 into orbit. On the other hand, even when you're faced with reality, you still stick to the same assumptions about communism based off works of fiction that you have read. You said: "I suggest you avoid statistics as much as possible," I suggest you avoid works of fiction, and quoting philosophical statements that have no impact on the discussion as much as possible. You said: "because if that is the game we play I can find statistics to show the exact opposite of your statistics, sadly we would be wasting time with statistics." I would be delighted for you to find statistics that show the exact opposite of mine. Sadly, we are wasting time with works of fiction and poetic statements instead. Here are more statistics: there is a drop in life expectancy of people living in post-Soviet Union countries after it's collapse. Male life expectancy in Russia fell from 63 years in 1990 to 58 in 2000. Belarus and Ukraine also saw a drop in male life expectancy. In Belarus it fell from 66 years in 1990 to 64 in 2009 and in Ukraine it declined from 65 years in 1990 to 62 in 2009. Kazakhstan is the former Soviet republic with the lowest life expectancy, falling from 61 years to 59 over the same period. Source: Low Life Expectancy Continues To Plague Former Soviet Countries https://www.rferl.org/a/life-expectancy-cis-report/24946030.html
    1
  21571. +misty bonnie Actually, I took it off quora and here's the source (updated with 2017 article) Source: How serious is the situation of China's economy? quora.com/How-serious-is-the-situation-of-Chinas-economy And what makes you think that I am paid by the government to post propaganda Youtube comments? Maybe the uploader is also being paid to upload propaganda YT videos.
    1
  21572. +misty bonnie How is Taiwan authentic Chinese culture? Taiwan was also ruled by Imperial Japan for 50 years! and there is also Taiwan Aboriginal Culture (which the Chinese in Taiwan destroyed) so why is there double standards for Taiwan and China? About corruption, Taiwan and China both have corruption and even in the mainland there are ongoing anti-corruption crackdowns and rooting out graft. As for Chinese culture, tourists flock to the mainland to come see the Great Wall of China, the Forbidden City, the Grand Canal (world's longest and oldest artificial river or canal) and Qin Shihuangdi's tomb, the Terracotta Army, as well as numerous Chinese historical and cultural sites. So how does Taiwan even compare with Chinese culture as compared to the mainland?
    1
  21573. USA keep on invading the countries in Middle East, and cut off the country's head (Muammar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, etc) in order to install their own US puppet there.
    1
  21574. +AM Life Why spreading "democracy" is considered something good, if it has led to various wars in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc? Russia and China are considered meddling in global affairs, when USA is the one spreading "democracy" and sending warships and bombers halfway across the world to wage war in Middle East and Asia? Our countries ARE in Asia, whereas the USA isn't, so what is America's business when its mainland is not threatened across the Pacific Ocean? Russia and China at least have a vested interest in peace and stability in Asia, not the USA. France, Germany, Scandinavia, Canada, Australia, exactly how are those countries several times better than China and Russia in every aspect? Do those countries have world's 2nd largest economy like China? Do those countries have world's 2nd and 3rd defense spending, like China and Russia? Are those countries willing to stand up against the USA when they believe that USA should not interfere in Syria, Afghanistan and Middle East, or are they just US puppets that agree to whatever demands America wants? Exactly how are these countries going to "balance" against USA, if they are helpless against whatever action US takes? For example in 2004, UN General Secretary of State, Kofi Annan had called the US invasion of Iraq "illegal," but President Bush still went ahead invade Iraq on suspicion of WMD, but found nothing in the end. You act like every country has to follow democracy to be successful, but why can't Russia and China follow our own governing systems, if they have worked out for our countries? Nobody said everyone in the world has to follow Western democracy, so why is USA spreading "democracy" and meddling in affairs in Eurasia, from across the Pacific Ocean?
    1
  21575.  @valuedcustomer8922  Why hasn't India (world's largest democracy) surpassed China yet?
    1
  21576.  @dagsmoko3889  China's driverless electric tractor has started working in our fields, equipped with a self-driving system, smart control system and Internet of Things. Video: China's first driverless electric tractor starts working youtu.be/ITTZRqV9_WQ As for China's cotton crop, they can be harvested by machines and the Chinese government even provide subsidies to cotton farmers. Video: Farmers Enjoy Good Cotton Harvest in Northwest China youtu.be/OEIrorv5R0k
    1
  21577. +Narendra Modi If so, then that is bilateral issue between China and Bhutan, not India's concern. If India does not want war, then why intervened in bilateral affairs in the first place?
    1
  21578. +Narendra Modi You literally just said that India has the power to decide Bhutan's foreign policy so doesn't that imply India is controlling Bhutan's foreign relations? How can Bhutan be sovereign country, if it allows India to dictate its foreign relations? Bhutan should be left to decide its own policy by itself, without India's interference.
    1
  21579. ELECTION TIME VOTE ON What attack first? Indian troops crossed the border to obstruct PLA road construction in our own territory, so who is the one attacking here? Indian troops certainly aren't defending Indian territory here.
    1
  21580. The current official Indian stance towards Tibet is that Tibet is part of China, as recognised by India, USA, UK, France, Russia, etc, and the rest of the UN nations. Nobody brings up issue of Tibet independence during all those UN meetings.
    1
  21581. +Total War Fan Why don't you ask your Indian PM Narendra Modi to raise up the issue of Tibet sovereignty during the next UN meeting, and see if other countries agree with him or not? Chinese government can also bring up Indian annexation of Sikkim as a response.
    1
  21582. +Narendra Modi Bhutan is unable to change its constitution, because like you said, India has control over Bhutan's foreign policy and India will not allow China to influence Bhutan. Much of Bhutan's livelihood depends on India, so of course Bhutan is reluctant to antagonise India, and is becoming Indian puppet. As for Tibet, like I said, PM Modi is welcome to raise the issue of Tibet during UN meetings, but China will retaliate by bringing up India's annexation of Sikkim.
    1
  21583. +Total War Fan China keeps quiet about Kashmir because India claims that territory. Similarly, India keeps quiet about Tibet, because China claims that territory. But India does not claim Doklam as part of its territory, so why should China keep quiet about Indian troops who trespass onto territory claimed by China?
    1
  21584. According to Indian Source: thewire (dot) in/156180/bhutan-doklam-border-china/ "People in Bhutan seem to think it is time to resolve the dispute without pandering to India's interest. The impression among Bhutanese now is that India has been coming in the way of Bhutan reaffirming its status as independent state, especially in foreign policy arena. Bhutanese think that India has for too long prevented their country from normalising diplomatic ties and negotiating a border with China, adversely impacting Bhutan's ties with China. Several Bhutanese Analysts (Sinchulumpa, Dramana and Shakhatoe) have argued that neither Bhutan nor India has strong historical argument to lay claim over Doklam. "Bhutan's claims are based on an imaginary line drawn on paper by British surveyors, like McMahon Lines, without actual verification on the ground" wrote Yeshey Dorji, a well-known commentator. "
    1
  21585.  @joesalazar770  Let's get this straight. It was cheap Chinese labor as well as Chinese government policies that enticed American companies to set up shop in China. Even your comment acknowledges this, so how is it thanks to the US government? It's the Chinese government that paved the way for China's eventual industrialization, not the US government.
    1
  21586.  @joesalazar770  Let me get this straight. It's thanks to China's cheap labor, as well as Chinese government policies that attracted American companies to set up shop in China, then how is again thanks to the US government? It's the Chinese government that paved the way for China's eventual industrialization here.
    1
  21587.  @dche207  Some of these expats actually married Chinese spouses and settle down with kids and a family here in China.
    1
  21588. Georgia's President was born in France and even though her party lost, she refuses to step down. All in the name of "democracy."
    1
  21589.  @hongweiyu2352  Meng Wanzhou was arrested in 2018 and its already 2020 and for 2 years, Meng can't leave, so it's unlikely she will ever see Canada the same way as before.
    1
  21590.  @nestrogodz9525  USA been spying on its allies for decades, after Julian Assange and Edward Snowden exposed US espionage activities.
    1
  21591. China even put forth a 12-point peace plan for Ukraine, but the Western countries just dismissed it and warned about the possibility of China sending weapons to Russia. Meanwhile, the U.S and EU continue to send weapons to Ukraine and prolonging the inevitable.
    1
  21592.  Tiopd Etuy  Yes, but not just "nukes n guns" (military power) alone, there's also other factors like economic power, political power, (even soft power like culture, movies, etc) at work, in order for a country to achieve superpower status.
    1
  21593.  Tiopd Etuy  "神州 Shenzhou like computer game criteria" Except that this is real life, not computer game.
    1
  21594.  @minivel5690  说得对，欧美根本没办法接受一种不是西方的国家成为超级大国，所以永远不把中国放在眼里。
    1
  21595. Anti-China sentiment is brewing in Australia, fueled by the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (phobia of the West being overrun by Asians).
    1
  21596. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21597.  @MarkYeung1  You're quoting data from 2022-2023, but the June 2024 data clearly shows that the European Union is the largest purchaser of Russian LNG and pipeline gas. Also, EU is still buying Russian oil products worth billions of dollars that are re-exported from Turkey.
    1
  21598. ​ @MarkYeung1  That's because China, India and Turkey are buying Russian oil, refining it and re-selling it to the EU (at a profit too). A study from the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) has found that while China, India and Turkey have ramped up Russian oil imports, they've also increased exports of refined products to the European Union. The CREA figures show that the EU has been the biggest importer of Russian refined products, with Australia next. The highest proportions of imported oil products were diesel (29%), jet fuel (23%) and gasoil (13%). The study also found that 56% of Russian crude oil shipped to laundromat countries have been transported by vessels owned or insured by the price-cap countries in the period December 2022 up to February 2023. The figure climbs to 74% for oil products exported from laundromat countries in the same period. Altogether, Western countries have together imported nearly $46 billion worth of oil products from China, India, Turkey, etc.
    1
  21599. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21600. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  21601. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21602. The port still requires human personnel to perform repairs and maintenance on those machines from time to time.
    1
  21603. @Teringventje Here's an clip of an action-packed, tank vs tank chase scene from Chinese movie Operation Red Sea 《红海行动》in 2018. Video: Operation Red Sea (2018) The Tank Chase youtu.be/lbrl7drJzxs
    1
  21604.  @stephenstrange4239  U.S would descend into civil strife if there was nobody left to fight with.
    1
  21605. Taiwan wasn't even listed as a destination on Nancy Pelosi's trip to Asia and she had to sneak into the island in the middle of the night.
    1
  21606. The trains connect to the landlocked countries in Central Asia, and who knows, maybe one day in future these places might become Las Vegas Style resorts out there in the middle of the landlocked central Asia.
    1
  21607. China is 3rd country in the world to demonstrate anti-satellite capabilities in 2007 by taking out a 750 kg satellite in orbit at altitude of 865 km, with a missile launched from the ground. If China takes out Indian's military satellites in space, then Indian army ground troops will be at a disadvantage without satellite communications and support.
    1
  21608.  @1truek269  Do you have evidence she was threatened?
    1
  21609.  @brooo4219  I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and she previously had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several years in fact, but where are the allegation of sexual assault in her post? Could you point out where in her post did she made any accusations against a high ranking govt official? Peng Shuai has denied the allegations, she wrote an email to Steve Simon of the WTA on 17th November, which stated that she was resting at home and that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng Shuai without her consent.
    1
  21610.  @brooo4219  Why would the Communist Party of China pay me to read out what's on Peng Shuai's post? According to the translation on Reddit, she actually consented to sex, Peng Shuai wrote: "Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well." So according to Peng Shuai's post, the sex was consensual and she did not make any allegations of sexual assault in her post (feel free to point it where she says so). Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile and avoid the public eye for a while until this all blows over, and she has expressed her desire for personal privacy in a video call with IOC. But the WTA are trying to pry into her personal affairs and demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see.
    1
  21611.  Elemental Entity  "神州 Shenzhou Because it is an attack on the world's economy by them." By them you meant the Americans right?
    1
  21612. It's a "cyberpunk" setting: a combination of lowlife and high tech, towering skyscrapers, flashing neon lights, rampant corruption, giant corporations running the government, and other elements.
    1
  21613. China's Three Gorges Dam generates hydroelectricity equivalent to 50 million tones of coal, producing 100 million tons of CO2 and 2 million tons of sulfur dioxide annually.
    1
  21614. Agreed. Chinese scientists have even found a method to convert sand to soil, using a blend of sand, water and a special kind of paste made from plant cellulose. Chinese researchers developed a paste made of plant cellulose, which helps retain water, nutrients and air. It's non-toxic, echo-friendly and affordable. Video: Chinese scientists find way to convert sand to soil youtu.be/idjegdl0L3Y
    1
  21615.  @zackk4969  You said: "The Chiinese search engine, Baidu, is a liar! If you search Zhao Ting & Oscar, It says Sorry, cannot find any results. Shame on you, Chiina!" I searched that term, and it says: 百度为您找到相关结果约1,310,000个 (Baidu found around 1,310,000 relevant results) so what are you talking about?
    1
  21616.  @zackk4969  Didn't you earlier mentioned Zhao Ting & Oscar earlier? And when I do the search, Baidu found around 1,310,000 relevant results when I searched for it, it says: 百度为您找到相关结果约1,310,000个。 Have you tried doing the search yourself?
    1
  21617.  @zackk4969  I did the search and Baidu found around 1,310,000 relevant results when I searched for it, it says: 百度为您找到相关结果约1,310,000个。So what are you talking about?
    1
  21618.  @zackk4969  You're just digging a hole for yourself by repeating your claims. Anyone here can perform the search on Baidu and come up with the results, what are you talking about?
    1
  21619.  @zackk4969  But earlier you said: "If you search Zhao Ting & Oscar, It says Sorry, cannot find any results." which is untrue. I did that and it returned 1,310,000 relevant results, so why did you say that earlier?
    1
  21620.  @zackk4969  Zhao Ting is not a sensitive word, I said it multiple times already, so why are you blaming Cyrus and China? If anything, YouTube allows censorship then why are you blaming Cyrus and China for YouTube policy? Shouldn't you be blaming YouTube instead?
    1
  21621.  @MarkYeung1  Since I've answered your question, could you answer me this question: After Carrie Lam withdraw the extradition bill on 4th Sept 2019, why is it that Hong Kongers continued to riot after the bill has been scrapped?
    1
  21622. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21623.  @rangerrick2246  You said: "I'd bet you've never been to HK and would have NO idea what's going on there." Have you actually been to Hong Kong yourself?
    1
  21624.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Even with the low count of 338,000, this still remained the largest anti government protest in China's history." China has 5,000 years of history, during which there were periods of civil unrest which have drawn larger crowds than what you are witnessing in Hong Kong. The Taiping Rebellion was an anti-government protest against the Manchu-led Qing Dynasty in which a man Hong Xiuquan (洪秀全) self-proclaim himself as the Son of God and the Brother to Jesus, leading 2 million people to protest against the government.
    1
  21625. Here's the Chinese way to explain the Ukraine/Russia war in the form of a family drama to help clear up confusion about the situation: More than 20 years ago, Ukraine divorced her ex-husband (Russia), taking several children along with her. Still, the ex-husband was very accommodating to her and generously left her with a lot of family property as well as paying off more than 200 billion in debts for her. After getting rid of her ex-husband, Ukraine started flirting with the village chief (United States) and his harem of concubines (i.e NATO countries) until she was completely ensnared in their arms. That's still acceptable to a certain degree, (but) she was enraptured with the village tyrant, and hooked up with him in a plan to attack her ex-husband. The ex-husband was very angry and had insisted on returning a child: Crimea. Ukraine began to harboring grudges against her ex-husband, and someday dreams of marrying into the NATO family, and of surrounding and constricting her ex-husband. The village chief didn't really want to marry Ukraine into the NATO family, because she was high-maintenance and loved to splurge money. Even his many wives did not want her into the family, yet they still encouraged her to join the family. In truth, the village chief just wanted to use her like a pawn to bully her ex-husband. After 8 years of constant abuse, her two children (Donetsk and Luhansk) were crying and imploring for help from their father. The village chief was always on the sidelines in the ex husband and wife conflict, occasionally sending in expired items (ammunition) from time to time. Ukraine thought she had someone to support her, and became even more presumptuous towards her ex-husband. The ex-husband could bear it no longer, took another glance at the poor treatment of the children, and rushed over in defense of his two children, so the ex husband and wife started fighting. Now, the village chief and his many wives are cheering on Ukraine from the sidelines, yet none of them are willing to lift a finger and partake in the actual fighting themselves. Ukraine is unlikely to marry into the NATO family, because that would mean that the village chief and his many wives would have to join the fight against the ex-husband. ... Hopefully this helps clear up any confusion in the Ukraine/Russian war and puts it on a more relatable level.
    1
  21626.  PUNK putin  It's basically the United States that's full of talk, while China is actually doing stuff. Actual tangible stuff that can be felt in the real world, not cheap talk like the U.S says so.
    1
  21627. @Time 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21628. @mav You said: "go to the Taiwan Independence day page" So where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? Otherwise, since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their constitution.
    1
  21629.  @ColoniaMurder20  During the Bronze age, Chinese metallurgists were experts at casting bronze artifacts such as bells and ding (鼎) vessels, of which many are on display in museums today. During the Iron Age, Chinese metallurgists invented the blast furnace and the cupola furnace, and invented metallurgical processes to create steel through the fusion of wrought iron and cast iron.
    1
  21630. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  21631. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21632.  @ColoniaMurder20  Many Filipino words that end in -kok are of Chinese origin. For example: mangkok, pingkok, pangkok. Other words include: sungki (protruding tooth) bimpo (face towel) bakya (wooden clog) hikaw (earrings), husi (cloth), lawlaw (dangling downward) sakya (wooden clogs) sansoy (ancient raincoat) tiho (bar of gold), pinse (borax), huwipe (torch) and so on.
    1
  21633.  @CaesarCassius  Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. While Hong Kong was British colony from 1841-1997, the 1956 HK riots resulted in 59 deaths while the 1967 HK riots resulted in 51 deaths, all while under British colonial rule. Yet in today's 2019 HK riots, there have been zero deaths thus far so aren't the Hong Kong Police showing incredible restraint here? Despite being under severe stress, physical and mental fatigue after months of protests, and facing public humiliation by the protestors and foreign media?
    1
  21634.  @drew8642  Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  21635.  @drew8642  Look at China and mainland China is world's 2nd largest economy and still growing. Whereas Hong Kong's economy is ranked 34th in the world and is currently in a slump today. And that's despite mainland China bring under communist party rule, while Hong Kong is suffering riots, under its own democratic government.
    1
  21636. Russia requested an investigation into the events in Buca, yet the UK denied Russia's request twice in the UN. Now the USA has hijacked UN Human Rights to expel Russia without proof.
    1
  21637. Chinese government always repeatedly stressed that India is welcome join in Belt and Road Initiative. The OBOR is massive project that involve geopolitical issues of many countries, so China can't afford to cater only to India's concerns and ignore everyone else. Pakistan already joined the OBOR, so of course China will address its issues first, over India's who hasn't committed to the project yet. Pakistan and India been fighting over Kashmir for 70 years, so this OBOR and CPEC actually offer a rare golden opportunity for the two countries to cooperate economically instead of confronting each other.
    1
  21638. Of course, China is the former while the United States is the latter.
    1
  21639. Large populations have more geniuses. Since China's population is 4.3 times that of the US, then there should be 4 Chinese geniuses for every 1 American genius and it can be proven statistically. Consider two bell curves for two populations, one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the US, which is also true for top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  21640. +Art Curious Indeed. Nationalism is what binds the people together. Even in America, there are numerous patriotic slogans like "Make America Great Again" or "America First" or "God Bless the United States of America". If I was American (which I am not) then I would probably also swell with pride on hearing such words.
    1
  21641. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  21642. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  21643. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  21644.  @breadman8596  What's the name of the Chinese battleship placed at the Sri Lanka port?
    1
  21645. With "friends" like the USA, who needs enemies?
    1
  21646. With "friends" like America, who needs enemies?
    1
  21647. Singapore media also took the anti-Russian news from Ukraine, without hearing out the Russian point of view, and they slapped sanctions on Russia without bothering to find out the reason for the special military operation.
    1
  21648.  @vegahimsa3057  I already long debunked your Wuhan virus lab conspiracy, what more do I need to say? There’s a rumor the coronavirus started in a Chinese lab. And a scientific consensus it didn’t. Source: vox.com/2020/3/4/21156607/how-did-the-coronavirus-get-started-china-wuhan-lab
    1
  21649.  @vegahimsa3057  You keep on saying Chinese scientists, but I already cited an article claiming that Chinese scientists say coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, but you just blatantly ignore it. Here's another source. Source: Coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, Chinese scientists say scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3051981/coronavirus-did-not-originate-wuhan-seafood-market-chinese Analysis of genomic data from 93 samples of the novel coronavirus suggests it was imported from elsewhere
    1
  21650.  @vegahimsa3057  I long debunked your Wuhan virology lab conspiracy and I cite sources to support my arguments. Here's another source: Source: Experts know the new coronavirus is not a bioweapon. They disagree on whether it could have leaked from a research lab thebulletin.org/2020/03/experts-know-the-new-coronavirus-is-not-a-bioweapon-they-disagree-on-whether-it-could-have-leaked-from-a-research-lab/
    1
  21651.  @vegahimsa3057  Japan, mainland China and Taiwan Reports on the Origin of the Virus Source: China’s Coronavirus: A Shocking Update. Did The Virus Originate in the US? globalresearch.ca/china-coronavirus-shocking-update/5705196 In fact the origin was for a long time unknown but it appears likely now, according to Chinese and Japanese reports, that the virus originated elsewhere, from multiple locations, but began to spread widely only after being introduced to the market. More to the point, it appears that the virus did not originate in China and, according to reports in Japanese and other media, may have originated in the US.
    1
  21652.  @vegahimsa3057  Wuhan Institute of Virology says conspiracy theories have ‘seriously interrupted the emergency research we are doing’ Source: Chinese research lab ‘badly hurt’ by man-made coronavirus rumours scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3051640/chinese-research-lab-badly-hurt-rumours-linking-it-man-made “The rumours … have caused severe damage to our researchers who have been dedicated to working on the front line, and seriously interrupted the emergency research we are doing during the epidemic,” the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), which is affiliated with the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said in a statement. Those rumours included that the new virus strain was “man-made”, “leaked from the WIV lab”, that “the WIV was taken over by the military”, “a WIV researcher died from the leaked virus”, “a WIV student is patient zero”, and “a WIV researcher reported to authorities that the WIV chief was responsible” for the epidemic, the statement posted on its website on Wednesday said.
    1
  21653.  @vegahimsa3057  You're just one of those anti-China people who care absolutely nothing for China's interests nor do you wish to see China succeed that's all. That's why you continue to propagate conspiracy theories about Wuhan Lab of Virology.
    1
  21654.  @vegahimsa3057  Which doctors reported the disease and disappeared? Dr Li Wenliang was spreading rumours about the coronavirus being SARS (which is clearly untrue, the Novel coronavirus is not SARS) so the government stepped in to stop the spread of unproven rumours that's all. And he wasn't prosecuted or disappeared, he merely signed a document agreeing not to spread unproven rumours that's all and he returned to work shortly afterwards. Why would China disappear doctors who are valuable assets in the fight against Covid-19? Where did you get such information that China is disappearing doctors?
    1
  21655.  @vegahimsa3057  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  21656.  @vegahimsa3057  Granted, the Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  21657.  @vegahimsa3057  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china And it's all been achieved under communist party rule, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  21658.  @vegahimsa3057  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    1
  21659.  @vegahimsa3057  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  21660.  @a04a27  China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. Source: Fishing Industry in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishing_industry_in_China China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_producing_countries_of_agricultural_commodities
    1
  21661. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21662. Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  21663. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  21664. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  21665. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  21666. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21667. @carpeomnia2011 "How do you prepare to lose access to the greatest market in the world?" That's precisely what the Americans should be asking themselves. China's population is 4x that of the the US's, making China one of the largest markets in the world.
    1
  21668. @MarkYeung1 No one knows what's Canada's response is. But everyone knows what China's response is. (Also, even the the Chinese territory of Hong Kong was not spared from tariff. Neither is the Chinese territory of Taiwan)
    1
  21669. @MarkYeung1 Even if you claim it's on the Canadian government website, still no one knows what's Canada's response is. Is it retalitary tariffs? Or appeasement? How many news media even reported Canada's response at all? Whereas compared to China, every news media is reporting China's response to the tariffs.
    1
  21670.  @rpg1663  "神州 Shenzhou I guess you didn't see the millions of Ukrainian people during 2014, protesting against President Yanukovych" Millions? Statistics of the Maidan Revolution estimate only some 400,000 - 800,000 protesters in Kiev, and even less protestors across Lviv, Cherkasy and Ternopil, so what millions of Ukrainians protesting against President Yanukovych are you talking about? Did you listen to the leaked recordings between Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt deciding which U.S puppet to install into Ukraine after the 2014 coup? They selected Arseniy Yatseniuk and POOF! Yats became the next Ukrainian president.
    1
  21671.  Beast Mode  Well, Biden also said that the Taliban will be unable to retake Afghanistan after the USA pulled out, yet the Taliban took over Afghanistan in weeks with minimal resistance so what makes you think USA will intervene in a Taiwan conflict or South China Sea conflict? The U.S and NATO aren't sending troops to defend Ukraine right now, so you have no guarantee that the U.S is willing to go to war with China. Many Americans themselves are frankly tired of war, and want the U.S government to focus on solving domestic issues like rising Covid cases, rising inflation, rising healthcare costs and so on, rather than get involved in another war overseas. In fact, this Ukraine crisis has derailed the U.S's pivot to Asia, and forced the U.S to divert their attention away from China and focus their attention on Eastern Europe instead.
    1
  21672.  @rpg1663  "神州 Shenzhou 400-800 in a single day?" I never said a single day, I was using statistics for the Maidan Revolution to arrive at that figure, but where did you get your figure for millions of Ukrainian people during 2014, protesting against President Yanukovych? You said: "What about the 24% of votes which the last pro-Russia puppet got in 2019? Does that make it clear to you where the Ukrainian people stand on?" In the 2019 Ukrainian election, Zelensky won a landslide victory with his promise of a "peace-settlement" in Donbas and that's what the Ukrainians voted for. He told reporters he would "reboot" peace talks with the separatists fighting Ukrainian forces and volunteers in the east. "I think that we will have personnel changes. In any case we will continue in the direction of the Minsk [peace] talks and head towards concluding a ceasefire," Zelenksy said. But throughout the election campaign, he avoided serious interviews and discussions about policy - preferring instead to post light-hearted videos to social media, and even after his election, he did not abide by the Minsk agreement, that's why Putin was eventually forced to take action. You said: "What about the almost 2,5 million people who already flee to the West instead of Russia?" Do you actually have proof of 2.5 million people fleeing to the West? Over the course of 8 years of conflict in Donbas, Russian officials said that 70,000 refugees had fled across the border into Russia since the fighting began.
    1
  21673.  Beast Mode  I merely pointed out to you that Joe Biden said that Taliban will not takeover Afghanistan, and yet he has been proven wrong after the 300,000-strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban in weeks with minimal resistance. Wasn't your argument all about things happening because the U.S government kept their word? If anything, it appears that you're the one suffering from cognitive dissonance here.
    1
  21674.  Beast Mode  But we can draw from the experience of what happened during the U.S botched withdrawal from Afghanistan, and from the U.S's refusal to put boots on the ground to defend Ukraine, that most likely the same thing could happen in a Taiwan conflict scenario. There is no guarantee that the U.S would be willing to go to war with mainland China over Taiwan, given their recent actions in Afghanistan and Ukraine. I am basing my arguments off events past and present that the USA took towards Afghanistan and Ukraine and applying them to a possible future scenario in Taiwan.
    1
  21675.  Beast Mode  Why can't I make predictions that the same thing that happened in the past (Afghanistan) and the present (Ukraine) will also happen in the future (Taiwan)? You're the one drawing a conclusion that war will break out between China and USA based on what's been stated by the POTUS, but I've previously mentioned that Joe Biden said the Taliban will not take over Afghanistan, when that's exactly what happened? It's like you just blindly follow the POTUS words even though they may be wrong (as proven in the Taliban takeover claim)
    1
  21676.  Beast Mode  But your argument is based on Joe Biden keeping his word. Well, Biden didn't keep his word that the Taliban would not takeover Afghanistan, this is the part that I'm referring to, not the withdrawal. And I'm not enforcing my view, I'm pointing out that we can predict what the USA will do in the future (Taiwan) based on what they are doing in the present (Ukraine) and what they did in the past (Afghanistan). I'm basing my argument on actual events that happen, whereas your argument does not draw on any actual events.
    1
  21677.  Beast Mode  Now who's the one trying to enforce their point of view? Many Americans are frankly tied of war, the Afghan War has demonstrated how pointless it is, and the Ukraine crisis of evidence of USA not willing to risk conflict with a nuclear-armed nation, Russia. China is also a nuclear armed country (as well as America's largest trading partner) so we can extrapolate that it's unlikely that USA would want to go to war with the mainland over Taiwan. And again, Biden can make promises and predictions (such as the Taliban will not takeover Afghanistan after the U.S withdrawal) yet he's been proven wrong in his predictions, so the basis of your argument that Biden keeps his word is already dismantled.
    1
  21678.  Beast Mode  It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set and many economists predict China's economy is expected to surpass the United States someday in the foreseeable future. As long as peace prevails, the U.S will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise, so there's only a limited window of opportunity if the U.S wants to wage a war to contain China's rise. Many Americans are suffering from "war fatigue" not to mention rising inflation, rising gas prices (after banning Russian gas), rising Covid-19 cases, rising healthcare costs, so for what reason will the U.S want to go with war with the mainland over Taiwan?
    1
  21679.  Beast Mode  Britain was once a colonial superpower during the 19th century, but they were eventually willing to accept being second place, after their former colony, the United States of America overtook Britain to become the world's superpower in the 20th century. So what makes you think the U.S won't accept being second place to China, who is expected to eventually surpass the U.S in the 21st century? Before Britain became a colonial power, China (and India) were historically economic powers and our GDP made up around 25% of the world's GDP from 1 - 1800 AD according to data by distinguished British economist Angus Maddison. Given that Americans are frankly sick of war, and concerned over domestic issues like rising inflation, rising gas prices, rising healthcare costs, Covid-19 cases, it's unlikely the U.S would want to go to war with mainland China (their biggest trading partner) over Taiwan island, given that their previous actions like the botched withdrawal of Afghanistan, unwillingness to send troop (or even impose a no-fly zone) to Ukraine. Time is on China's side, as long as peace prevails, the U.S will decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise, and by then, Taiwan's perceived backing from the U.S will evaporate, and reunification will occur. Once again, I'm basing my argument on the actual materialistic ground conditions and historical events, whereas your arguments appear to derive seemingly from emotions, not logic.
    1
  21680.  @tannedpotato5375  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    1
  21681.  @zackk4969  "神州 Shenzhou Chiina is full of shxt" So you're just going to s**t on China? And why you think Zhao Ting is a sensitive word?
    1
  21682.  @sara.cbc92  "神州 Shenzhou It's nationalists like you who give China a bad name." So you can proudly boast "Taiwan no.1" yourself, but when I do the same for mainland China, you're labeling me as a nationalist? "Try one of the world's lowest GDP per capita where the average joe is on borderline poverty (US$450 p/m)." China has to host the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people, so if you're taking GDP per capita, then if you divide our GDP by our enormous population, then of course you'll arrive at at GDP per capita lower in the mainland than in Taiwan. Look at India for example, they're the world's 2nd most populous country (as well as the world's largest Western-style democracy) yet India's GDP per capita is even further behind China's.
    1
  21683. Some Chinese study abroad, because China is world's most populous country with such a high student population, competition is fierce and intense here for top schools and higher education. Some students unable to make it into local university so they choose to study abroad (especially if their parents have $$$) It doesn't necessarily mean that China's education system is bad.
    1
  21684. @Lawrence Wong About Education in China, as of 2013, China is a top destination for international students, ranking world's 3rd most popular international student destination and the most popular in Asia (surpassing Japan, Korea, Singapore by sheer volume of students). As of 2018, the country had the world's second-highest number of top universities. Source: Wikipedia: Education in China
    1
  21685. Putin is well-aware of the games the West plays with him. Have you watched this video: Exclusive: Full Interview With Russian President Vladimir Putin youtu.be/m6pJd6O_NT0 ?
    1
  21686. Meanwhile, Western journals continue to predict an economic hard landing for China. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2021 Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  21687.  @The-Crazy-Coonass  "Then suddenly, Didi appears out of no where." Chinese company Didi was founded in 2012 before Uber left China in 2016, who said Didi appeared out of nowhere? When Uber launched in China, they accepted only U.S credit cards and not WeChat/Alipay, which was one advantage Didi had over Uber. Uber distrupted the local taxi drivers of cities that it expanded in, while Didi connected taxi drivers to passengers, so it didn't incite chaos and violence unlike what Uber did.
    1
  21688.  @The-Crazy-Coonass  Google failed because they were unable to capture a majority market in China compared to it's rival Baidu. Here's a chart comparing how Baidu overtook Google in market share from 2009 to 2019. Video: 10 most popular search engine in China 2009-2019 - by market share youtu.be/Dbp6PR2pMMM
    1
  21689.  @gulamog5041  "神州 Shenzhou did you get 50 cents yet from CCP?" Why not attempt to refute my points, instead of accusing me of being a 50¢ under the Communist Party?
    1
  21690.  @The-Crazy-Coonass  "神州 Shenzhou yes but immediately after Uber left Didi started working much better than it did while Uber was around." Because Didi's competitor Uber left China, so obviously their business is going to pick up, isn't it? And Uber's infrastructure relied on accepting U.S credit cards, and using Google Maps for navigation, whereas Didi already had their own infrastructure, accepting Alipay/Wechat Pay.
    1
  21691. +ALLAHbless RUSSIA China's 5000 years of history and culture is too expansive to be wiped out by any single man, political party or revolution. China still have ancient monuments like the Great Wall of China, Tomb of 1st Emperor of China and his Terracotta Army, the Forbidden City, the Grand Canal, etc. According to UNESCO, China is ranked 2nd in world in number of world heritage sites at 52, only behind Italy/Rome at number 1 with 53 sites.
    1
  21692. +Tony Iacomi I clearly never said "China is the oldest civilization", I said "China is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today". Egypt may be older, but it is certainly not 'continuous' like Chinese civilization. For example, do Egyptians still speak Ancient Egyptian and write Egyptian Hieroglyphics today? Chinese culture today is still very much the culture as it was in the past. Chinese people still celebrate the Chinese New Year (like our ancestors did before) and Confucian values are still taught in China (as well as in Confucian institutes all over the world). Of course, not everything is the same after 5000 years of history, but Chinese culture is still distinct enough that the civilization is considered 'continuous'. I mean, even some Western scholars agree that China is among the oldest 'continuous' civilization. For example, Chinese values like honoring our ancestors still persist today. We have altars dedicated to our ancestors and during Qingming Festival 清明节 also known as "Tomb-Sweeping Day", we visit our ancestors graves to tidy up their surroundings and pay our respects to them. Also, did you know that the Chinese New Year migration, where Chinese people travel back to our home province to be with our families, is considered the world's largest annual human migration (even larger than the Christmas migration) ? About China's 5000 years of history, did you know that the Shang Dynasty (1600 BC) was once considered mythical until around 1950s where the Oracle Bone Script (Chinese Characters) were uncovered, showing that the Shang Dynasty really existed? The even earlier Xia Dynasty (2070) is considered mythological today, but it doesn't mean that it did not exist and new archaeological discoveries are always ongoing and uncovering more evidence to support China having 5000 years of history. I mean, Chinese nobility have been wearing luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, whereas the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths as "bedsheets" called togas so how is our Chinese history only 3000 years? Silk is such a valued Chinese commodity that a trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material.
    1
  21693. +Tony lacomi said "Dumb ass. Starting in 1979 Jimmy Carter directed EVERY federal agency, all 43 agencies, to help China develop." The US was clearly not China's friend. For example, when the World Trade Organization was formed in 1995, China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate our country as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because United States, and its allies requested that China first reform various tariff policies, including tariff reductions, open markets and industrial policies. The United States imposed additional conditions on China and when China joined the WTO, we agreed to considerably harsher conditions than other developing countries. If USA really wanted to help China, then why did USA impose additional conditions on China joining the WTO? It was not until 2001 (6 years after WTO founding) that China was finally admitted into the WTO.
    1
  21694. +Tony lacomi China has also helped USA by buying off US debt (about USD 1.2 trillion) to help USA tide through its 2008 financial crisis. If USA really helps China, then why USA forbid the sales of US weapons to China? Even in international cooperation, NASA is forbidden from working with CNSA (Chinese NASA) on joint space projects. Space exploration is for all mankind's benefit, yet Chinese workers and scientists aren't even allowed to work with NASA? America is even willing to work with former Soviet Union Russia, but not China? Why should China have additional conditions imposed on our entry to WTO, because of our political stances? What has a country's political stances even got to do with trade? You mean because China's authoritarian regime with very different values than yours, gives you the right to deny China entry into an "international" organization? What unfair double standards is this? China could have become a WTO founding member without US 'help' and in fact it was USA that delayed China's WTO entry in the first place, so how exactly did USA help China? The WTO officially commenced on 1 January 1995 under the Marrakesh Agreement, signed in Morroco so how is that "your system" ? At that time, China wanted to be a signatory and a founding member of WTO, but was thwarted by USA, so how is this suddenly "your system"?
    1
  21695. +Tony lacomi " One could argue that Greek's virtually unchanged political system is an important aspect of civilization. " But as far as I know, Greece is not considered a 'continuous' civilization by many scholars and historians, unlike China. Greek democracy, Spartan democracy, Athenian democracy, Republic of Rome's system, etc, they are all distinct from modern Western democracy. About China not being a united people until 221 BCE, Egypt was also not unified at one point, and was divided into Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt, each ruled by its own Pharaoh with distinct crowns of their own. So who can draw the line at when the start of civilization began in Egypt? Those 3 questions you asked and answered about people living in China, our language, and our civilization, they are just your personal beliefs that's all. After all, you clearly said "But what I would call as a civilization that still exists today? No." means its according to your own definition of a civilization that's all. Your wife's great grandmother grew up during turbulent time in China's history and was only recounting her own experiences. But Chinese belief in 5000 years of history existed long before 1950 and wasn't just the doing of Chairman Mao. For example, during the Qing Dynasty under the Manchu rulers, the Manchu textbook 滿蒙漢合璧教科書 (節錄) had a chapter China (中國) and a passage displayed read "Our country China is located in East Asia... For 5000 years, culture flourished (in the land of China)... Since we are Chinese, how can we not love China." For 5000 years, culture flourished (in the land of China) Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Qing_dynasty#History I mean, why are you basing what you know about China's history off your wife's great grandmother's stories? You think what she says is reliable? About the growing body of evidence about Chinese migrating from Egypt, can you list of the evidence you claimed? Many Chinese people belief we are descended from homonids found in East Asia, such as the Peking Man a Homo Erectus uncovered in Zhoukoudian 周口店 in 1920s. Excavations at the site under the supervision of Chinese archaeologists uncovered 200 human fossils (including six nearly complete skullcaps) from more than 40 individual specimens, but the work was sadly interrupted by the Japanese invasion of China. About "Why China will Never Rule the World" book, its just a book written by someone that's all. I mean, nobody expected Britain to become a colonial power, but it became one in 19th century. Nobody expected America to overtake its colonial master, but America did and became the superpower in 20th century. So why expect that China will never rule the world based on some author's book? China was a superpower for 1800 years before Britain became one herself, so who's to say China won't become superpower again in the future?
    1
  21696. +Tony lacomi I have literally shown you a passage quoted from Qing Dynasty textbook 滿蒙漢合璧教科書 (節錄), proclaiming that China has 5000 years of history, whereas what have you shown but your wife's great grandmother's stories? You just claimed that "Before the 1950s, China never claimed to have 5,000 years of history" Why don't you show a copy of the Chinese textbook that says so, to support your claim? You keep saying there is a growing body of evidence of artefacts from Egypt that predate these human remains but have yet to produce any of this evidence. About China and Egypt, I found out that even the Ancient Egyptians found Chinese Silk to be valuable, and that silk has been found in the Valley of the Kings in a tomb of a mummy dating from 1070 BC. There are also Western scholars who believed the Han Chinese descended from Peking Man. For example, Franz Weidenreich (1873 – 1948) considered Peking Man as a human ancestor and specifically an ancestor of the Chinese people, as seen in his original multiregional model of human evolution in 1946. How exactly is Greece considered 'continuous'? You claim the political system is the same, but ancient Greek democracy is not the same as modern Western democracy. Greece was conquered by Rome and Rome introduced its own version of democracy, and then after the fall of Rome, there weren't any more democracies arising, until modern Western democracy came about 200-300 years ago. So how exactly is this considered 'continuous'? About Greek religion staying intact, do the people of Greece worship ancient Greek gods like Zeus, Aphrodite, Apollo, etc, like they did in the past? Or do the modern Greeks worship Christ instead today? Whereas China still has Chinese New Year festival (world's largest human migration) Qingming Festival, Mooncake Festival, etc, so where's your evidence to support your claim that Greek religion is intact much more than China? About China's 5000 years of 'continuous' history, what actually defines a history as continuous? Everyone have their own definition of continuous, but mine is that the history books can be traced almost completely to the civilizations origin. Chinese scholars have been recording Chinese history in every year. We have the names of all 650+ leaders of China, what period they ruled China, what government system they had, how many wives and concubines they had, how many children the royal family had, what happened to their sons, what happened to their daughters, which son succeeded him and so on. We have the historical names of all of China's armies top generals, the size of their armies, the strategies they used, which battles they won, which battles they lost, how many casualties they suffered, how many war horses were killed, what compensation was given to the deceased families, which territories were conquered and lost. We have information about other countries interaction with China, which states were under Chinese suzerainty, which were hostile to China, which were friendly to China, how much tribute was paid to China, and how much tribute China paid them. Of all the existing ancient civilizations, I would claim that none of them had a history as complete as that of China's. China did not have any "dark ages" where no information was being recorded and we can trace our history all the way back 5000 years to the beginning thanks to written texts by our ancestors. List of Chinese monarchs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_monarchs I mean, you just biased claim Chinese people today are the product of Mao, when I have shown proof of Chinese people celebrating ancient Chinese traditions, honoring our ancestors and our culture, visiting our relatives during Chinese New Year, eating Chinese food and so many other Chinese traditions. Even our classical music is Chinese and played from ancient Chinese instruments persevered from long ago, so who are you to claim Chinese people aren't what our ancestors were? Beautiful Chinese Music - Bamboo Flute video: youtube.com/watch?v=-5qhNRmMilI
    1
  21697.  @cherrykotori  I fail to see the difference. The U.S General Milley had power over then President Trump when he was POTUS to not launch an attack on China, so why won't he have the same power over President Biden today to not launch an attack on China?
    1
  21698.  @ne0ge049  How am I speaking from a script? I clearly pointed that the U.S General made a phone call to his Chinese counterpart and assured him that the U.S will NOT attack China?
    1
  21699. Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors (just ask the expats here). However, many Westerners (but not all) are increasing regarding Chinese in their lands as unwelcome.
    1
  21700. The Nayirah testimony and the Weapons of Mass Destruction claims were used to manufacture consent for war among U.S citizens for the Gulf War and the Iraq War, and both turned out to be hoaxes. Now it appears USA is doing the same to China, using allegations of genocide of Uighurs to manufacture consent for war among Americans against China.
    1
  21701. U.S commitment is to use the island as a chess piece to contain the mainland's rise.
    1
  21702.  @milopas6467  Why India hasn't come up with their version of vaccine, unlike China and Russia? Which country has the largest number of Covid-19 cases after USA and Brazil?
    1
  21703.  @enotik18  泽连斯基的操作不禁让人联想到蒋介石。蒋介石和泽连斯基的共同点，就是对美国十分依赖，都扮演着美国走狗的角色。乌克兰不知道的是，美国所谓的承诺只不过是一张张空头支票，永远都没有兑现的那天。不过等到他们发现事实真相的时候，恐怕已经为时已晚，乌克兰注定是美国为了达成政治目的一个工具，注定会有抛弃的那一天。
    1
  21704.  @enotik18  泽连斯基不知道的是，美国所谓的承诺只不过是一张张空头支票，永远都没有兑现的那天。不过等到他们发现事实真相的时候，恐怕已经为时已晚，乌克兰注定是美国为了达成政治目的一个工具，注定会有抛弃的那一天。
    1
  21705.  @enotik18  美国所谓的承诺只不过是一张张空头支票，永远都没有兑现的那天。不过等到泽连斯基发现事实真相的时候，恐怕已经为时已晚，乌克兰注定是美国为了达成政治目的一个工具，注定会有抛弃的那一天。
    1
  21706.  @enotik18  泽连斯基不知道的是，美国所谓的承诺只不过是一张张空头支票，永远都没有兑现的那天。乌克兰注定是美国为了达成政治目的一个工具，注定会有抛弃的那一天。
    1
  21707.  @enotik18  泽伦斯基不应该相信美国的承诺。美国所谓的承诺只不过是一张张空头支票，永远都没有兑现的那天。不过等到他们发现事实真相的时候，恐怕已经为时已晚，乌克兰注定是美国为了达成政治目的一个工具，注定会有抛弃的那一天。
    1
  21708.  @enotik18  泽伦斯基不应该相信美国的承诺。美国所谓的承诺只不过是一张张空头支票，永远都没有兑现的那天。不过等到他们发现事实真相的时候，恐怕已经为时已晚，乌克兰注定是美国为了达成政治目的一个工具。
    1
  21709.  @enotik18  泽伦斯基不应该相信美国的承诺。美国所谓的承诺只不过是一张张空头支票，永远都没有兑现的那天。乌克兰注定是美国为了达成政治目的一个工具，注定会有抛弃的那一天。
    1
  21710.  @enotik18  乌克兰注定是美国为了达成政治目的一个工具，注定会有抛弃的那一天。
    1
  21711.  @mikejones6065  Russia has "depleted Ukrainian munitions." Get it?
    1
  21712.  @NNNgocNguyen  Communist China even helped Vietnam gain independence from France. During the First Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons (ranging from artillery guns to rifles and machine-guns), ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help Vietnam fight for independence. Source: First Indochina War wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Indochina_War#China From 1950 to 1954, the Chinese government shipped goods, materials, and medicine worth $43 billion (in 2019 dollars) to Vietnam. From 1950 to 1956, the Chinese government had also shipped 155,000 small arms, 58 million rounds of ammunition, 4,630 artillery pieces, 1,080,000 artillery shells, 840,000 hand grenades, 1,400,000 uniforms, 1,200 vehicles, 14,000 tons of food, and 26,000 tons of fuel to Vietnam. But some Vietnamese nationalist conveniently forgot Chinese aid to them during First Indochina War and some even claimed that they won their independence all by themselves.
    1
  21713. Asterix Comics characters have such funny names. A blacksmith named Fulliautomatix, a fishmonger named Unhygenix (and his wife, Bacteria) and the bard named Cacophonix, whose discordant songs make the heavens rain.
    1
  21714.  @crescentprincekronos2518  "神州 Shenzhou it's all hate, envy, and jealousy.", "the human civilization will outlast all nations on earth", "there are currently no peoples or nations prepared to truly lead the world." Marxist-Leninist ideology aims to achieve communism, which is often described as a stateless, classless, moneyless society, in which the class struggle is finally won. Theoretically, there would be no need for money in a communist state, because the accumulation of money grants rich people access to goods/services that the poor aren't able to access. There would be no need for a government if the people themselves are capable of governing themselves in a communist society. It seems from your words, that communism is the end goal you believe humanity should strive towards.
    1
  21715.  @junebug8485  If the U.S's is being competitive, then why is the U.S banning the sale of chip-making machinery to China? This reeks of "deep seated jealousy" rather than the spirit of competitiveness.
    1
  21716.  @junebug8485  "神州 Shenzhou If you compete with the US government it's not going to be fair at all," So in other words, you're saying the U.S government does not compete fairly? Then you've proven that the U.S is motivated by "deep seated jealousy" else for what reason would they not play fair?
    1
  21717.  @billyehh  A problem of actually building them? China is home to more skyscrapers than any other in the world. Here's a list of countries by number of buildings over 150m in height, according to Skyscraper Center. 1. China (2,980) 2. United States (859) 3. United Arab Emirates (314) 4. South Korea (276) 5. Japan (271) 6. Malaysia (266) 7. Australia (142) 8. Indonesia (129) 9. Canada (126) 10. Thailand (125) ... Source: Skyscraper Center So how is it a problem of actually building houses in China?
    1
  21718. That sounds suspiciously like American soldiers, dying on foreign soil such as Vietnam and Korea. Today, even US troops are dying in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. Why are you interfering in wars outside of your country, on territories India doesn't claim for itself at all?
    1
  21719. MannyEHC President Xi Jinping himself is willing to crackdown on corruption within the communist party, which many previous Chinese leaders did not want to tackle, so what's wrong with leaving him in power to maximise the benefits to China? Such strong anti-corruption leaders are extremely hard to come by. And exactly how has term limits help political leaders not to become corrupt? Look at Hilary Clinton (who is probably corrupt) and during his campaign, Donald Trump wanted to jail her. But after becoming President, the investigations into Clinton's supposed corruption has halted.
    1
  21720.  @zjeee  People on Weibo have no problems accessing the ex-wife's (Ukraine's) side of the story. Also the village chief and his harem of wives just literally banned RT news and Sputnik Radio from all the villages, so how's that seeing both sides? How many of the villagers actually seen the conflict from the ex-husband's (Russia's) side?
    1
  21721. 其实 那些像Casper Cito的老外真的以为他们很了不起。呆在中国几年，就以为他们对中国的知识比中国人多。
    1
  21722.  @epicenter6213  I agree. When Hong Kong was still a British colony, there was no democracy and no elections were ever held by people of Hong Kong during its time as British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover to mainland China, did Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for the first time. Yet this happens?
    1
  21723. Agreed. The increase of freedom of speech is accompanied by a decrease in taking responsibility for what's being said.
    1
  21724.  @abbotsful  Video: China increases coal production to ensure winter supplies, easing energy shortage youtu.be/7sHZ74VLkUc Chinese coal mining firms are increasing production ahead of winter, with some coal mining enterprises running at full capacity in a bid to ensure supplies. China said it has raised daily coal production by over 1 million tonnes (1.1 million tons) as of October 2021, in a bid to ease an energy shortage.
    1
  21725.  @AdamSahr-cj4kf  "A Malay doesn't even need to mention he or she is Malaysian." How about the Malays who were born in Singapore and granted Singaporean citizenship? Don't they need to mention that they aren't Malaysians?
    1
  21726.  @AdamSahr-cj4kf  Singapore has separated from Malaysia since 1965 to become an independent and sovereign state. So don't the Malays born in Singapore and granted Singaporean citizenship need to mention that they aren't Malaysian?
    1
  21727.  @AdamSahr-cj4kf  So since you've acknowledged that Singapore is separated from Malaysia, therefore, won't Malays born in Singapore and granted citizenship need to mention that they aren't Malaysian?
    1
  21728.  @AdamSahr-cj4kf  When did I ever said anything about Chinese here in this thread? I was responding to your comment that: "A Malay doesn't even need to mention he or she is Malaysian." well how about the Malays born in Singapore and granted citizenship? Since you've acknowledged that they are a national of the new nation, then these Malays need to mention that they are Singaporean.
    1
  21729.  @AdamSahr-cj4kf  Granted Singapore citizenship, not Malaysian citizenship. That means that a Malay with Singapore citizenship will have to mention that they aren't Malaysian.
    1
  21730.  @AdamSahr-cj4kf  So why'd you claim earlier that (and I quote your words: "A Malay doesn't even need to mention he or she is Malaysian." Since you claimed Malaysian is a nationality, then clearly there exists Malays who aren't Malaysian, (such as the Malays born in Singapore.)
    1
  21731. Chinese politicians are at War with poverty. American politicians are at War with poor people themselves.
    1
  21732.  @MarkYeung1  After the founding of the People's Republic of China, Chairman Mao Zedong seized the lands from the corrupt KMT landlords and redistributed it among the peasantry in China. So it appears Mao's actions were for the people indeed. Also, a poll in Russia has revealed that around 83% of Russians support Putin's actions as the President of the Russian Federation.
    1
  21733.  @MarkYeung1  Chairman Mao Zedong seized the lands from the corrupt KMT landlords and redistributed it among the peasantry in China. So it appears Mao's actions were for the people indeed. Also, a poll in Russia has revealed that around 83% of Russians support Putin's actions as the President of the Russian Federation.
    1
  21734.  @testusersg  Singapore choosing to buy the U.S F-35 is actually supporting the U.S military-industrial complex.
    1
  21735.  @testusersg  You said: "the "revenue" factor is actually not that significant." Supporting the U.S military-industrial complex is not just in terms of "revenue" alone, the U.S uses its F-35 program as a sort of "prestige award" for its closest allies, creating a kind of demand for the plane so that other U.S allies know that they are in the U.S good books. The U.S may also use Singapore as a "guinea pig" to test its F-35 (from which I heard, is full of problems). You said: "the advantage it gives to the RSAF is signifcant against potential adversaries in the region," Could you elaborate on what significant advantage does the F-35 confer onto Singapore? You said: "(such as the one always threatening to cut our water supply)." Singapore government is always trying to subconsciously portray Malaysia as "the enemy". Since its merger with Malaysia, Singapore has been creating all sorts of troubles for Malaysia (especially Lee Kuan Yew's different policies) and Singapore behaves almost like a thorn in Malaysia's side. So Singapore education system has to oftentimes portray Malaysia as a potential enemy to ensure its survival. It's more likely that Singapore's F-35 might be used to contain China's rise. The U.S might pressure Singapore to deploy its F-35 against China.
    1
  21736.  @testusersg  It was Singapore that wanted merger with Malaysia and Singapore politicians (beginning with David Marshall in 1955) repeatedly courted the Tunku Abdul Rahman about merger with the Federation. But Malaysia initially didn't want merger. Malaysia can survive without merger, and Tunku Abdul Rahman constantly rebuffed it before finally accepting it, thinking Singapore might fall into another foreign power's grasp. But even after being granted merger, Singapore stirred up trouble in Malaysia by coming up with different policies and opposing against Malaysia's national policies (like you said: "LKY wanted a m'sian's msia, but UNMO wanted malay's m'sia") So from Malaysia's point of view, Singapore was clearly a thorn in Malaysia's side. Malaysia wanted no part of merger, yet still granted it to Singapore, and yet Singapore repaid this gesture by going against Malaysia's national policies. But the Singapore's education system (understandably) tries to paint Malaysia as the perceived enemy to justify its survival You said: "Having a stealth figher of course give SG advantage over m'sia, indonesia and surrounding countries." Actually, I asked: "Could you elaborate on what significant advantage does the F-35 confer onto Singapore?" yet you just say it gives an advantage that's all? Having a stealth fighter also increases the suspicion that Malaysia, Indonesia, etc have towards Singapore. You said: "SG with or w/o F35 is nothing to China. SG will never fight against China." The U.S could pressure Singapore to deploy the F-35 to scout the South China Sea, and potentially attack Chinese warships or bases in the SCS. It's unlikely that Singapore will use the F-35 against Malaysia, Indonesia, etc. You said: "I say, more likely is SG will allow China to open a logistic naval supply base like what US is doing now." The U.S will never allow that. The U.S is already much opposed to China's security deal with Solomon Islands, it's unlikely they will allow Singapore to host a Chinese logistical naval supply base. The U.S might threaten to cut off its F-35 maintenance program in Singapore, making Singapore unable to obtain parts to maintain their F-35 fighters.
    1
  21737.  @cheongwenpa  From what I understand, Malaysia has never cut off water supplied to Singapore. The Separation Agreement signed between Singapore and Malaysia on 7 August 1965 guaranteed the water agreements from 1961 and 1962 and grant Singapore rights to the use of water originating on the Malaysia side of border till 2061. So this "random act of madness" appears to be a notion possibly conceived by Lee Kuan Yew himself in order to paint Malaysia as the perceived enemy of Singapore. You said: "This is an open statement and we are not ambiguous about why we have a strong army." In the possible event that Malaysia decides to break their agreement and cut off water supplies to Singapore, it's unlikely Singapore's army would be able to reverse this action. An army can only last a few weeks to months at most without water supplies, and what is Singapore going to do? Invade Malaysia and conquer it in the limited time span?
    1
  21738.  @cheongwenpa  Could you show me when has Malaysia ever cut off water supplied to Singapore? If not, then since this "random act of madness" appears to be conjecture by LKY, meant to paint Malaysia as the perceived enemy of Singapore.
    1
  21739.  Julian  The wrong-doings of a tyrannical government? Singapore has been ruled by authoritarian single-party, People's Action Party for it's entire life. For 56 years, the PAP ruled Singapore with an iron fist, and Singapore's founder, Lee Kuan Yew was a dictator who tolerated no dissent, and jailed/exiled Singaporean dissidents and political rivals. According to _Human Rights Watch: Singapore: Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. The government has aggressively enforced a sweeping “online falsehoods” law that permits government ministers to order the “correction” or removal of online content. Now doesn't Singapore's system sound like China's?
    1
  21740.  @testusersg  So it appears you're unable to refute the points I brought up, so you start making insinuations about my identity in order to discredit me. I have pointed out that I listened to Malaysia's side of the story, but it appears you just blindly believe Singapore's side is true, you said: "SG education only tell the facts" and "Everything that was reported in the news about m'sia are facts understand?" Then aren't you displaying your naivete for all the world to see here? You said: "the SG leaders always emphaise friendly relationships with neighbour and never aggressive," Then why did you bring up "(such as the one always threatening to cut our water supply)." here? It's clear that subconsciously you regard Malaysia as a threat, yet you're unable to furnish proof that Malaysia has threatened to cut off Singapore's water supply. The only example (given by Mole Man) is from Lee Kuen Yew's statement himself. You said: "It is funny that some countries many time bigger are crying about island nation SG pointing a gun at them." That's because there's some country crying about imaginary threats of their water supply being cut off. And frankly speaking, Malaysia is under no absolutely obligation whatsoever to supply any country with water, especially if said country threatens to go to war with Malaysia if they don't supply water. Isn't that basically the same as pointing a gun at somebody and demanding that they sell you water? It's almost like how the European countries slapped sanctions on Russian gas, yet they still demand Russia not cut off their gas supply to European Countries.
    1
  21741.  Julian  "神州 Shenzhou your forgetting the millions that died under his rule." Chairman Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine, which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong himself couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    1
  21742.  Julian  Singapore slapped sanctions on Russia because it's a basically pawn of the United States. No other ASEAN country slapped sanctions on Russia, whereas Singapore has earned a place on Russia's list of "unfriendly countries".
    1
  21743.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou The problem is. Although we all know the POSITIVE SIDES of Mao Zedong, many people choose to ignore the NEGATIVE SIDES of Mao." You've gotten it in reverse. Hardly anyone in the West knows the positive sides of Mao Zedong, they all know the negative sides of Mao and many people choose to ignore the positive sides of him. Seriously, just go talk to any ordinary Westerner (or even some overseas Chinese) about their opinion of Chairman Mao. There are only a few people in the West that truly recognize Mao's contribution, one example is black activist Malcom X. During a 1964 rally in Harlem, New York City, Malcolm X praised Mao’s global leadership. “They used to have a saying that one doesn’t have a Chinaman’s chance. But they don’t say that anymore. They used that expression back when China was weak. But now that Mao Zedong has been successful in making China a strong country, the Chinese have more chances than anybody else.” - Malcom X
    1
  21744.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "The support of sanction by Singaporeans is overwhelming." According to poll numbers by Blackbox, the move to impose sanctions on Russia by Singapore is supported by 60% of Singaporeans polled, with 35% saying they were unsure or had no opinion. 60% isn't overwhelming. On the other hand, Singapore has been blacklisted by Russia and put on the list of "unfriendly nations" as a result of Singapore's sanctions on Russia.
    1
  21745.  @testusersg  Johor Baru frequently faces water shortage, meanwhile Singapore enjoys drawing water from Johor River at the price of 3 sen per 1,000 gallons. It probably cost more to transport the water from JB to Singapore, given the absurdly low price Singapore pays for the water. It's like pointing a gun at somebody and demanding that they sell water to you, but offering to pay a meager 3 sen for 1,000 gallon. Yet you seem to think Singapore is not responsible for tensions over the water issue with Malaysia? Have you actually looked at the issue itself, or you just blame the Malaysians that's all?
    1
  21746.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou The reason why the bank accounts were frozen was they may be obtained illegally. Similar laws apply in China" Same in China, the money was frozen because the police and banking regulators were investigating allegations of illegal financial activity.
    1
  21747.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "The protestors were beaten up *because the bank took their money.*" Some protestors were beaten up probably because of unruly behavior, not because the bank took their money. How does your reasoning make sense?
    1
  21748.  @MarkYeung1  Canadian police used pepper spray and smashed truck windows as they stepped up their attempt to clear Ottawa of protestors. A trucker was seen on viral video being beaten by Ottawa police during the “Freedom Convoy” demonstrations. Romanian-born Csaba Vizi, a 20-year resident of Canada, said on Fox News on Monday that he expected to be arrested, but not attacked by cops.
    1
  21749.  @lodzalater8169  "so why has her name been deleted from all search engines ???" I just search Peng Shuai 彭帅 on Baidu and it returned 9,610,000 relevant results, so what are you talking about?
    1
  21750. World events have shaped China in the past. Now, China is shaping world events.
    1
  21751. Such a terrible comparison. The Soviet Union suffered the most casualties out of WWII (even more than China) at the hands of the Germans. Yet the Soviet Union also inflicted the most damage unto the Germans during WWII. Putin's family suffered at the hands of the Germans during WWII, and that's why he vows to make Russia strong enough to resist imperialism
    1
  21752.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "in terms of leadership qualities, not historical background." Putin has impeccable leadership qualities, able to hold 5-hour long marathon press conference, in which western media like NBC reporters can pose questions for Putin to answer. In contrast, RT and Sputnik news reporters aren't allowed to pose questions to Biden in the US press conference, so who's the real authoritarian here?
    1
  21753. It's even more obvious in their predictions about China (since 1990). 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. New York Times: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet despite their predictions, the fact is that China's economy grew 5% year-on-year in 2024.
    1
  21754. Its because USA spend so much money on wars such as Iraq War, Libyan War, Afghan War, Syrian War, etc. It is estimated that US wars in Middle East cost the country an estimated 3 trillion ($3,000,000,000,000) dollars as well as US soldier losing their lives on foreign soil or returning home traumatized. Just for comparison, China owns about $1.2 trillion dollars worth of US debt.
    1
  21755.  @polarcape  China today is hardly communist, and many experts have even claimed China is in fact more capitalist than even some Western countries.
    1
  21756.  @GabrielEddy  "So, what you are saying is, China is one protest away from revolution." It's apparent that even after proving your earlier statements wrong, you continue to believe in a narrative that the people in China want to overthrow the government. Why is this so? Is it because you're unable to stomach seeing China succeed that's all?
    1
  21757. Agreed. Leaders in the West often like to boast about tackling climate change, then shouldn't access to affordable EVs be a priority? The Earth could always use more affordable EVs from China.
    1
  21758.  @宋庆-i4m  Because I was refuting  @Jonathan He  by saying that if Taiwan can claim all of the mainland as theirs, then can't mainland China claim Taiwan as part of our territory? Did you even follow the discussion?
    1
  21759.  @宋庆-i4m  It the Taiwan's constitution is "symbolic" then why can't Taiwan modify their constitution in order to reflect what they really think? Otherwise, since there is no amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan still claims all of mainland China as part of the ROC, then likewise, can't the mainland claim Taiwan as part of the PRC?
    1
  21760.  @宋庆-i4m  Then why can't Taiwan amend their constitution? Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan still claims all of mainland China as part of their territory (including territory currently under the control of _Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan) then can't the mainland claim Taiwan as part of our country? Even according to USA, they recognise Taiwan as part of China since the 1972 Shanghai Communique and the USA does not challenge this position. Here's what The Diplomat says about the 1972 Shanghai Communique. On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia... The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position. ... (Taken from The Diplomat: The Shanghai Communique: An American Foreign Policy Success, 45 Years Later)
    1
  21761.  @BeerHombre  What has the cartoon character Winnie the Pooh even got to do with this? The people of Taiwan can't even amend their own constitution, then how does it make Taiwan an independent country? They don't even hold sovereignty over their own constitution for crying out loud.
    1
  21762. Donald Trump wasn't the cause, he's a symptom of American dissatisfaction. As much as you try to singluarly pin the blame on him, Trump did not start any new wars while he was in power, and Trump was interested in making deals with other world leaders. But look at Biden, and he's literally detested by other world leaders and unable to make deals with anyone.
    1
  21763.  @hyc1266  As much as Cyrus detests Trump, as U.S president he got along well with Putin, and it's possibly that Russia might not have to launch their special military operation in Ukraine had Trump won his re-election. Also, President Trump was willing to meet North Korean leader Kim Jung-Un (The 1st U.S President to do so). Additionally, Trump did not start any new wars for America.
    1
  21764. Firstly, America is a Free Market, but China never claimed to be a Free Market. So why Americans impose their "Free Market" ideologies on China then? You yourselves choose Free Market, doesn't mean China has to follow your example isn't it?
    1
  21765.  @veekwok5611  What do you think is the right thing for Carrie Lam to do? She has formally withdrawn the HK extradition bill, yet the HK protests continue. She says she's open to dialogue, but the HK protestors don't want to talk. Then what do you expect her to do?
    1
  21766. The United States is fighting wars in Middle East countries and cutting off the countries' heads (Muammar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, etc) and installing their own US puppet governments in place that's all.
    1
  21767.  Steve Freeman  Tulane virologist Robert Garry, PhD, and a team of researchers analyzed the genome sequence of the novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and found no evidence that the virus was made in a laboratory or otherwise engineered. Video: Virologist explains origins of COVID-19 youtu.be/YLykxJqTBpU
    1
  21768.  @jakelaw9768  Back in 2019, there was no actual indication of human-to-human transmission, the first human-to-human transmission case in China was confirmed only on 20th Jan 2020 and that's when the government began implementing quarantine measures shortly after. Source: China confirms human-to-human transmission of coronavirus theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/20/coronavirus-spreads-to-beijing-as-china-confirms-new-cases
    1
  21769.  @manwalkingtheearth  The Wuhan virology lab conspiracy has long been debunked by experts. Source: The Wuhan Virus Is Not a Lab-Made Bioweapon foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/29/coronavirus-china-lab-mortality-virology-wuhan-virus-not-bioweapon/
    1
  21770.  @manwalkingtheearth  So you can't refute my points so you resort to hurling personal insults against me for my views? You just claim Chinese culture is the problem that's all and ignore any viewpoint that contradicts you? Then perhaps you are the one who is brainwashed.
    1
  21771.  @manwalkingtheearth  Here's another source debunking the coronavirus origin in Wuhan virology lab conspiracy. Source: The conspiracy theories about the origins of the coronavirus, debunked vox.com/2020/3/4/21156607/how-did-the-coronavirus-get-started-china-wuhan-lab There’s a rumor the coronavirus started in a Chinese lab. And a scientific consensus it didn’t.
    1
  21772.  @manwalkingtheearth  Here's another source debunking the Wuhan virology lab conspiracy. Source: No, COVID-19 Coronavirus Was Not Bioengineered. Here’s The Research That Debunks That Idea forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2020/03/17/covid-19-coronavirus-did-not-come-from-a-lab-study-shows-natural-origins/
    1
  21773.  @manwalkingtheearth  You're just biased against Chinese culture that's all. Look even experts have determined that Covid-19 did not originate in Wuhan seafood market and analysis of genomic data from 93 samples of the novel coronavirus suggests it was imported from elsewhere. Source: Coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, Chinese scientists say scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3051981/coronavirus-did-not-originate-wuhan-seafood-market-chinese
    1
  21774.  @DescendantofYellowEmperor  Exactly, even American CDC found no evidence of human-to-human transmission, even Hong Kong virology expert Dr Guan Yi (director of the State Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases at the University of Hong Kong) said at first that there was no human-to-human transmission.
    1
  21775.  @manwalkingtheearth  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by the rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china) which were in great demand throughout the ancient world. Take Han Chinese traditional clothing Hanfu (汉服) for example and it has 5,000 years of history and even the Japanese Kimono and Korean Hanbok clothing have their origins in Chinese Hanfu. Video: Beautiful Traditional Costume: Han Chinese Clothing (Hanfu) youtu.be/T6CucJxiWec?t=5
    1
  21776.  @manwalkingtheearth  Ancient Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought.
    1
  21777.  @manwalkingtheearth  With Chinese invention of paper, came inventions like paper lanterns, paper umbrellas, toilet paper (now in high demand across the world) and paper banknote (which made business transactions easier since merchants need not carry around lots of metal coinage and precious stones) Mankind's first aviation was in the form of paper kite, and even hot air balloons were invented in China, and were known as Sky Lanterns (天灯) or Kongming Lanterns (孔明灯) Here is beautiful video of RISE Lantern Festival in Las Vegas, celebrated with Chinese Sky Lanterns. Video: youtu.be/SNtwlBbBdb4?t=10 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  21778. +Ari F Asian Americans have an identity crisis because they grow up in American education system, eat Western food, watch Hollywood movies, hang out with American friends, but still, Caucasian (white) Americans tend to regard their fellow Asian (yellow) Americans as foreigners. Such people are often called 'bananas' because they are white on the inside, yellow on the outside.
    1
  21779.  @hamiorg  What makes you think Chinese are incapable of thinking and innovation? China invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world. Paper and Printing made the recording and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought.
    1
  21780.  @hamiorg  What makes you think Chinese creativity is wiped out by communism? The communist party is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending and catching up fast to the United States. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($451.9 billion) <--- 3. European Union ($379.0 billion) 4. Japan ($165.7 billion) 5. Germany ($118.8 billion) 6. South Korea ($91.6 billion) In the West, researchers offend have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    1
  21781.  @hamiorg  I disagree with your thinking. Communist countries are just as capable of creation and innovation. Look at Communist Soviet Union for example, and they made great advancements in nuclear energy as well as space. The first satellite in space was Soviet Satellite Sputnik-1, the first man in space was Russian Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin and the first space station was Soviet Salyut-1. The Cold War period saw many creations and innovations in Soviet Union, such as aerial refueling, missile boats, submarine launched ballistic missiles and ICBMs. Therefore, the Communist Soviet Union was just as capable of creation and innovation as the United States. You are only looking at Communist doctrine and somehow jumping to conclusion that Communist countries are incapable of creation base off of that?
    1
  21782.  @hamiorg  The Soviet Union collapsed because they tried to introduce political reforms too quickly, but my point that Communist Soviet Union is capable of being creative and innovative (Sputnik, Yuri Gagarin, Salyut, Aerial Refueling, Missile Boats, Submarine launched missiles, etc) has already been proven. As for China, over 50 years ago, nobody expected "communist" China would ever succeed, become powerful or play an important role in world politics. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1990s, everyone expected China to soon follow. But China defied all expectations of failure, and survived long after the USSR dissolution, transforming from dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, into an economic powerhouse, the world's factory (Made in China) a growing scientific and technological power, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army and China today has strong global presence as well as being influential player of world politics. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China. Despite what Western anti-Communist media been denouncing all along, China has been immensely successful under our political system, so why should China replace our social structures? Because the West says so?
    1
  21783.  @hamiorg  I have already proven my earlier point that Communist Soviet Union was indeed capable of innovation, so what more is there to talk about Communist countries allegedly being incapable of innovation? But you're just going to pretend that these Communist Soviet innovations somehow didn't exist? And the Soviet Union introducing reforms is also another form of creativity, but its just that with all instances of creativity, some will yield positive results while others don't, and Soviet Union's reforms was the latter, While China was the former, and did indeed introduce capitalist reforms successfully. I would not say China has reached the status of developed nation, since on average, Chinese people are poorer than in developed countries like Japan, S. Korea, Singapore, etc. So there still remains plenty of room to grow (especially in Western China like Tibet, Xinjiang, etc) And while China is indeed approaching the status of developed nation, as long as the United States is ahead of China, China will have a clear target to achieve and attempt to surpass the USA. China might only start "stagnating" once China surpasses the USA at some point in the future As for China's economic slowdown, it is only a temporary setback, because of the US-China trade war, but Trump's tariffs won't last forever you know. Soon, President Trump will eventually have to step down from being US president, once his term ends, and the next POTUS might just reverse Trump's policies and lift the US-China trade war, thus possibly resulting in a future economic boom for China, as US-China trade relations resume their previous pre-tradewar levels. Who knows?
    1
  21784.  @hamiorg  I have proven that the Soviet Union, a communist country, is still capable of innovations, and even listed some of their inventions. Yet your going to blatantly deny Soviet Union creativity? The first satellite did not exist until Sputnik-1 and neither did the first man in space before Yuri Gagarin, nor the first space station before Salyut-1. By refusing to acknowledge these Soviet achievements, you are revealing your biasedness against Communist countries, probably because you have been brainwashed by Western anti-Communist propaganda. Otherwise, why else would you refuse to concede that these Soviet inventions exist? China's economic growth is still 6.2% whereas the America's economic growth is 3.1%. And like I said, this is because of US-China trade war, which can't possibly last forever. Trump's tariffs are extremely unpopular among American businesses, since contrary to what Trump says, it's not China that pays for the tariffs, its the American companies that pay for it, and it will eventually trickle down to affect the consumers (Americans themselves) So the next US president candidate might just promise to reverse Trump's unpopular policies, to gain American support. Who truly knows the future? But the odds are seemingly stacked in China's favor here. President Xi Jinping even abolished the president term limits, so he'll most likely still be guiding China long after Trump's tariffs are gone.
    1
  21785.  u wot  Economic decline in China? According to the latest reports, China's economic growth is 6.2% whereas the US economic growth is only 2% in comparison. And the US tariffs only affects Chinese goods entering USA, they don't impact Chinese goods entering the European Union, Australia, Canada, India, and the rest of the world. America is not the only market for China you know. Not sure why you claimed that the world is turning against China from all sides. Japan and China are growing closer economically because of S. Korea-Japan trade tensions, Phillipine President Duterte is establishing better relations with China. You're just dreaming of a scenario involving China's downfall and the world standing up to China, when most of the world clearly wants to continue trading with China.
    1
  21786.  @wrongchannel2780  Yeah, who voted for the U.S government if not ordinary Americans?
    1
  21787.  @skevx0  How else did the U.S government get voted into power if not for ordinary Americans voting for their government? Surely you can see the logic of how the U.S government gets into power through garnering majority of the American voters, then by this logic, shouldn't you have the share the same feelings you have towards the U.S government towards ordinary Americans? It was Americans that elected their government into power after all.
    1
  21788.  @skevx0  "And they couldn't possibly know everything that their government did, so my feelings towards the US government don't apply to the ordinary Americans." What do you mean Americans don't know? The information is all out there about the U.S involvement in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Yemen War, etc yet you're claiming that ordinary Americans don't know that about their government? Yet despite this supposed ignorance, the Americans decided to vote their government into power, then how can you not extend the same feelings you have for the U.S government towards ordinary Americans?
    1
  21789.  @skevx0  This is not about my feelings, it's about your feelings towards the U.S government being extended to the Americans that voted for and elected the government into power. It's apparent that you have a negative view of the U.S government, then how about the ordinary Americans that voted and elected their government? Shouldn't they bear at least some of the responsibility for the U.S government coming into power?
    1
  21790.  @skevx0  So I'm making it harder just by pointing out the simple logic that the ordinary Americans elected their government? Is it because you can't refute my logic, that you resort to making personal remarks about me instead?
    1
  21791.  @TurbulentEitri  Everyone knows that you cannot choose your own family members. Those separatists are being influenced by foreign powers seeking to sow divisions between the people of Taiwan and mainlanders. Their wish for independence can only be achieved if they choose some other tract of land, because Taiwan island inalienable part of China.
    1
  21792.  @jtf873  "but that famine is a great cover story.. if you want to hold on to that there's not much point and saying more.. you don't want to face the reality." As you've said, the famine is just a cover story. You refuse to look beyond the cover story into the actual good that Mao Zedong did for China. As I've mentioned previously, under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Life Expectancy in China nearly doubled from 35-40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 and is is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history. But you're the one seemingly fixated on the famine cover story, while refusing to face reality here.
    1
  21793.  @jtf873  You said: "how many can be Christians in China if they choose to? I mean without the government regulating it to fit their liking.." China is literally the world's largest printer of Bibles. In 2019, Chinese company Amity Printing Co. celebrated the milestone of printing 200 million Bibles for believers worldwide. Of the 200 million Bibles printed so far, over 85 million have been supplied to churches in China, with the rest exported to 147 countries and regions. Have you checked whether your Bible is Made-in-China?
    1
  21794.  @jtf873  You said: "anyway if you want masters like that I hope the best for you, you can go live under them or invite them to destroy freedom here" It's ironic that you denigrate others for making assumptions about you, while you yourself also make assumptions about others. I'll ask again, have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself? If not, then why are you seemingly making assumptions about a country that you've never been?
    1
  21795.  @jtf873  You said: "And yes, I'm on a platform that is only allowing certain perspectives to be expressed because of the poisoning of our country by Chinese-like mentalities." And here I thought you were all about "freedoms" and "openly express how people feel" yet when a Chinese-like view is expressed, you equate it to poisoning.
    1
  21796.  @jtf873  You said: "the ROC was before the PRC, so they could argue that their CHINA was stolen from them." Why did the ROC lose the mainland to the PRC in the first place and had to flee to Taiwan? At the start of the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (taxed from peasants), they had superior equipment and superior numbers over the Communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of poorly-equipped, heavily outnumbered Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates the KMT's gross incompetence in their ability to rule the mainland, while cementing the Communists' right to rule China. Why then should the KMT be granted the right to rule the mainland?
    1
  21797.  @jtf873  You said: "And yes, I'm on a platform that is only allowing certain perspectives to be expressed because of the poisoning of our country by Chinese-like mentalities." And here I thought you were all about "freedoms" and "openly express how people feel" yet when a Chinese-like view is expressed, you call it poisoning.
    1
  21798.  @MA-fg5hz  The thing is exactly what crime did Meng Wanzhou commit? The USA keeps on modifying the charge, first they claimed it's because Meng (or Huawei rather) violated US sanctions on Iran. But Canada also violated US sanctions on Iran, so why is Meng being extradited?
    1
  21799.  @MA-fg5hz  Did you watch this in depth discussion of Meng Wanzhou's case by two Canadians? It goes into detail about the case, Canada produced 25-page indictment that's just full of holes and doesn't stand up the scrutiny. And Canada kept on the changing the crime from violating Iran sanctions to using the US Dollar, and so on. Video: Two Canadians Discussing Huawei & The Meng Wanzhou Extradition youtu.be/9z_X_JejLHU Meng has been in essence, kidnapped without random.
    1
  21800.  @intothewrx  Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  21801.  Truth Bomb  Breaking what law? Meng Wanzhou did not break any Canadian laws while in Canada, why was she arrested since 2018 and its already 2020 and still no progress on her case?
    1
  21802. China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, in many countries in Africa. In the short span of a few decades, China has done much to develop countries in Africa, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  21803.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou CGTN criticize the democratic system all the time. Including the Canadian system." But wheres a video of CGTN criticizing the ideology of "democracy" itself? I searched "CGTN Democracy" and CGTN merely pointed out that some of the so-called Western democracies no longer appear to be democracies. Instead of being a democracy of the people, by the people, for the people, these Western democracies have mutated into plutocracies of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%, that's all, and that some countries are even exporting war to other countries, under the veil of democracy, then that's not criticizing the ideology of democracy. I mean, in Canada, did Canadian voters themselves voted directly for Canadian PM Justin Trudeau? How many votes were cast for Trudeau by Canadians themselves? Did you personally vote for Trudeau as a PM candidate? The sad thing is that there are some overseas Chinese that are stuck with a "mindset of the colonized" and just blindly worships their host countries as "bastions of democracy" when this isn't necessarily the case in reality. Local Westerners themselves have begin to notice that their own democratic institutions are failing from within, but some overseas Chinese living still blindly worship the West as "democratic".
    1
  21804.  @Andy-P  At that time, the Communists were basically recruited from peasant classes themselves, so what's this CPC 'Royalty' label that you're trying to put on Xi? Furthermore, 'royalty' or not, China's political system is meritocratic where it does not count on a candidate's bloodlines, as long as the candidate passes exams and performs well, he'll rise through the ranks, garnering votes from other equally qualified communist members, to become President of China. Xi Jinping has around 40 years of political experience under his belt, that's why majority of the people of China believe that he's competent enough to lead a country of 1.4 billion (certainly no easy feat). Whereas in the United States, someone with zero prior political experience like Donald Trump can just waltz into the White House, all you need is money and funding for the your Campaign and someone who's poor cannot become POTUS. Also, I've known Western leaders that served longer than President Xi. German Chancellor Merkel had served 4 terms (16 years) and probably would have served longer if she didn't voluntarily choose not to appear in the next German election. That's already twice the length of Xi's 2 terms (8 years).
    1
  21805. It's easier to fool a man, than to convince him that he's been fooled.
    1
  21806. When asked about Afghanistan, Biden said: "That was 4-5 days ago!" .... Well, this was 10 years ago....
    1
  21807. China's solar power plant is even able to generate electricity at night. Instead of using solar panels, the solar farm uses mirrors to focus the Sun's rays towards the central tower like a magnifying glass, heating up molten salt. The heat from the molten salt turns water into steam to drive turbines. Even after the Sun goes down, the molten salt retains enough heat energy to continue producing electricity throughout the night.
    1
  21808. China's solar power plant is able to continue generating electricity at night, thanks to molten salt technology.
    1
  21809. Singapore's birth rate is even lower than China's at 1.16 (as compared to China's 1.6) so much that Singapore has to rely on importing foreign workers (including those from China) in order to support Singapore's aging population. And Singapore has hardly any land, yet a huge population of 5 million, so its among the most densely populated country (and quite possibly just as crowded as some of the major Chinese cities)
    1
  21810. I remember you from back in 2020 where you did not want Trump to be re-elected. Yet here we are today, with Joe Biden having abysmally low approval ratings. It is possible that had Trump been re-elected, there would be no Russian special military operation in Ukraine right now.
    1
  21811. I remember you from back in 2020 where you did not want Trump to be re-elected. It is possible that had Trump been re-elected, there would be no Russian special military operation in Ukraine right now.
    1
  21812. Boris Johnson's "Party-gate" and Hunter Biden's "Laptop-gate" are examples of what the rich and famous do in UK and USA.
    1
  21813.  @bigchef3394  "神州 Shenzhou while that is true" So those words indicate you agree with my point that American tanks were generally inferior to their German counterparts at the start of WWII. But after the Nazis surrendered, the Americans copied German Intellectual Property and absorbed German Panzer (Tank) technology, and that's one reason why American tanks are so powerful today.
    1
  21814.  @bigchef3394  Ming Dynasty was where Admiral Zheng He made seven voyages throughout the Indian Ocean, visiting Africa, India and the Middle East, leading an flotilla of 300 over treasure ships with a crew of over 27,000. Some of these ships were huge, at 3-5 times the size of Christopher Columbus's flagship, the Santa Maria. Video: Crash Course History (Zheng He) youtu.be/NjEGncridoQ?t=126 But Zheng He's fleet wasn't for conquest and colonization of other countries, it was a peaceful merchant armada consisting of ships carrying Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, books, to trade with other nations of the world. China wasn't interested in setting up overseas colonies unlike the Western colonial powers.
    1
  21815.  @bigchef3394  "神州 Shenzhou i understand that, china has always been trade focused," Even today, China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    1
  21816.  @bigchef3394  After the Nazis surrendered, the Americans absorbed German Panzer (Tank) technology and that's one reason why American tanks are so powerful today. Same goes for German Air Force (Luftwaffe) aircraft designs being copied by Americans and Nazi V2 rocket scientists being put to work on NASA space missions.
    1
  21817.  @blackstar19gammaburst85  Taiwan had been ruled by authoritarian single-party KMT for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist, and Chiang kai-Shek was a dictator who jailed and executed his political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: White Terror (Taiwan) wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Terror_(Taiwan) But under KMT authoritarian rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹) Between 1952-1982, economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983-1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965-1986 and the percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965-1986. And it was all achieved under single-party KMT rule. Source: Taiwan Miracle wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_Miracle Only when democracy was introduced in 1990s (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan, if KMT did not implement political reforms) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Today, Taiwan's economy is in a slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, and many graduates from Taiwan are seeking job opportunities abroad, such as in mainland China or in Singapore.
    1
  21818.  @Leo-hr7yq  The Republicans and the Democrats spend more time fighting each other, and sabotage each other's plans instead of fighting for America's future. Both parties blame one another for America's woes and nobody does anything to tackle U.S problems like rising debt and healthcare costs. Because your leaders have to step down after 4-8 years, once their term limits are over, so they can't make long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. And Germany under Hitler was an industrial and military power. At the start of WWII, their German tanks were superior to American tanks and their technology highly advanced, so how was Germany a failure during that time? Even today, German Chancellors like Angela Merkel have been in power for longer than Hitler and that's why Germany is so successful. Source: List of Chancellors of Germany by time in office wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chancellors_of_Germany_by_time_in_office
    1
  21819.  @KobeBeefBryan  China has the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper_and _Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese technology?
    1
  21820.  @KobeBeefBryan  Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-graft campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign, but after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    1
  21821.  @blackstar19gammaburst85  China has produced many successful Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, ZTE, LENOVO, DJI, Haier, Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, NetEase, Meituan-Dianping, Bank of China, ICBC, AgBank, China Construction Bank, Ping An Insurance, Sinopec Group, China National Petroleum, China Minmetals, China State Construction, and the list goes on. Many of these companies have successfully made it onto business magazines like Forbes Global 2000 and Fortune Global 500 Sources: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies Forbes Global 2000 wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Global_2000 Fortune Global 500 wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_Global_500 But where are all the famous companies from Taiwan?
    1
  21822.  @KobeBeefBryan  Chinese invented weapons like the crossbow which enabled unskilled medieval peasants to fight against skilled bowmen on equal footing, as well as siege engines like the triple ballistae and the traction trebuchet Besides inventing gunpowder, Chinese also invented handcannons, handgrenades, fragmentation bombs, landmines, naval mines, exploding cannonballs, rocket launchers, multi-launch rocket systems and of course, fireworks. Americans celebrate the 4th of July with Chinese fireworks, and there was even an ancient Chinese flamethrower capable of launching continuous stream of flame (the first of its kind) which must have been a fearsome sight to behold in the ancient battlefield. Video: Ancient Chinese Flamethrower youtube.com/watch?v=goi-FVnTD5Y&t=915
    1
  21823.  @KobeBeefBryan  Anti-graft is another term for Anti-corruption, not graffiti. You can't refute the fact that China is conducting anti-corruption campaigns, whereas the United States isn't? Why aren't Hillary Clinton's "mysterious" emails being investigated?
    1
  21824.  @KobeBeefBryan  Over 100 officials of provincial-ministerial level and above have been implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China, Source: Officials implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China (2012–2017) wikipedia.org/wiki/Officials_implicated_by_the_anti-corruption_campaign_in_China_(2012%E2%80%932017)
    1
  21825. @Ben Benito Then why hasn't any Western countries launched a Quantum satellite into orbit unlike China has?
    1
  21826.  @panchovilla3493  China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores. Yet most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    1
  21827. @Testing Channel for videos American healthcare workers look overwhelmed, tired, overworked and ill-equipped, facing shortage of masks, gloves, goggles, faceshields, PPE suits and ventilators, and what does US government does about? State governments have to bid for the medical supplies. Whereas Chinese doctors and nurses look well-equipped in comparison.
    1
  21828. @Testing Channel for videos Granted, the Chinese Communist Party is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  21829. @Testing Channel for videos There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  21830. @Testing Channel for videos Source: Coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, Chinese scientists say scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3051981/coronavirus-did-not-originate-wuhan-seafood-market-chinese The novel coronavirus that has claimed the lives of more than 2,400 people did not originate at a seafood market in the central China city of Wuhan as was first thought, according to a new study by a team of Chinese scientists.
    1
  21831. @Testing Channel for videos The Chinese government rushed to built a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised. Video: Huoshenshan: the hospital built in 10 days in China over coronavirus outbreak youtu.be/l2QfufpwfdY Kudos to the Chinese construction workers who worked hard to build those hospitals. China also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. Video: Time-lapse video shows how Leishenshan hospital completed in 12 days youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk
    1
  21832. @Testing Channel for videos Look at "Communist" China and the government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and stop production, impose lockdown, close tourist attractions, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and contain the virus. 1,000-bed hospital and 1600-bed hospital were built in Wuhan, medics from all over country boarded planes to fly to Wuhan and medical supplies poured into Wuhan to help the doctors and nurses there. Now it's finally paying off and China is slowly restarting our economy. Video: Xi Jinping: 'People's safety and health always come first' youtu.be/G_hiIpEXpTg But look at "Capitalist" Western countries like US and UK, their economies are too precious to sacrifice so human health has to be sacrificed instead. Trump wants to get the economy back on track ASAP and Boris Johnson is relying on herd immunity. The American healthcare workers look overwhelmed, tired, ill-equipped, facing shortage of masks, gloves, goggles, faceshields, PPE suits, ventilators. The worst thing is that state governments have to bid for the medical supplies and compete with one another.
    1
  21833.  @panchovilla3493  Which country automatically knows we are under attack by a strange new virus? China reported the emergence of a strange new virus on 31st Dec 2019 to the World Health Organization. By 11th Jan 2020, China had sequenced the complete Covid-19 genome (an amazing feat in such short time) and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html Western countries had months to prepare, but China only had weeks to prepare.
    1
  21834.  @panchovilla3493  "神州 Shenzhou china have" army" of people who specialise in buying power of products from around the world...when pandemic hit china." Chinese people bought those supplies legally and paid money for them. Money was flowing out of China into your countries that had medical supplies that China needs, so why can't Chinese purchase those medical supplies legally?
    1
  21835.  @panchovilla3493  I quote Italian doctor to support my arguments, but you're just anti-China that's all. You're biased against Chinese who bought medical supplies legally and paid cash for them and shipped them to China. Because China needs those medical supplies and money is flowing out of China to your economies with each purchase. And the Italian Doctor knew about the strange pneumonia in Lombardy, Italy since November 2019, yet did not investigate? A "strange pneumonia" was circulating in northern Italy as long ago as November, weeks before doctors were made aware of the novel coronavirus outbreak in China, one of the European country's leading medical experts said this week. Source: _Covid-19: ‘Strange pneumonia’ seen in Lombardy in November, leading Italian doctor says Read more at https://www.todayonline.com/world/covid-19-strange-pneumonia-seen-lombardy-november-leading-italian-doctor-says_ todayonline.com/world/covid-19-strange-pneumonia-seen-lombardy-november-leading-italian-doctor-says "They [general practitioners] remember having seen very strange pneumonia, very severe, particularly in old people in December and even November," Dr Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, said in an interview with the National Public Radio of the United States.
    1
  21836.  @panchovilla3493  Who said that eating bats caused the coronavirus? The bat soup coronavirus origins have long been debunked by scientists. Source: Is bat soup a delicacy in China? We debunk a rumour on the origin of the coronavirus observers.france24.com/en/20200203-china-coronavirus-bat-soup-debunk-videos-viral-palau-indonesia
    1
  21837.  @melvyncarrot4741  Chinese legally bought those masks off the shelves and forked out cash for it, because China needs those supplies, so why can't Chinese purchase those supplies? Money is flowing out of China into your countries with each purchase, isn't it. And you claimed that this behaviour is unacceptable outside of China, then why did your own people buy off all the toilet papers off your shelves then? Why the double standards applied between Chinese and other people when it comes to purchasing supplies? Chinese purchased those supplies legally, look at the USA hijacking a shipment of masks meant for Germany from China. A German official has accused Washington of "modern-day piracy," after 200,000 masks bound for Germany were confiscated by the U.S. at a Bangkok airport. Video: Coronavirus: US accused of hijacking shipments of masks | DW News youtu.be/sQZ1FeSKyBo
    1
  21838.  @melvyncarrot4741  Chinese purchased those medical supplies legally and shipped them to China, because China needed them at that time, so why blame Chinese for following the rules? There are people who hoarded toilet paper (and masks too) yet you're racially singling out Chinese and ignoring the toilet paper hoarders? Why apply double standards between Chinese and other people? And Chinese forked out cash and paid for it, look at the USA literally hijacking a shipment of supplies bound got Germany from China.
    1
  21839.  @melvyncarrot4741  And you don't understand your double standards, look those hoarders buying all the toilet papers off the shelves and filming it too? Why only racially single out Chinese who buy supplies for our homeland because China needs those supplies? Now that China has a surplus, we are exporting masks to other countries.
    1
  21840.  @melvyncarrot4741  Here's a look inside Chinese BYD mask factory. Video: Factory produces 5 million masks a day in bid to supply shortfall youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw?t=17
    1
  21841.  @melvyncarrot4741  "especially since this virus was alerted to the rest of the world from China." Yes, China alerted the rest of the world about a new coronavirus strain and informing WHO on 31st Dec 2019. By 11th Jan 2020, China had sequenced Covid-19 genome and shared the information with WHO so the rest of the world can take preparations. So like I said, China needed those medical supplies (we had an outbreak on our hands) so could you explain why is it wrong for Chinese to purchase those supplies from foreign lands? You have the supplies and China needs those supplies, so Chinese paid cash and bought those supplies legally. Why do you bring foreign lands into the equation, as long as the supplies are purchased legally? Your countries received money from China with each purchase, yet you're still complaining? Because you're biased against Chinese people? And till now, you don't even acknowledge USA hijacking a a shipment of 200,000 masks bound for Germany from China.
    1
  21842.  @melvyncarrot4741  This factory in the eastern Chinese city of Rizhao (日照) has been busy pumping out 3,000,000 masks a day. Video: Inside China's Biggest Mask Factory youtu.be/Gc074FxOBA4?t=11
    1
  21843.  @panchovilla3493  Chinese bought those masks legally, forked out money for it, and sent them back to China, because at that time China needed those masks. What makes you think China somehow foresaw all this? Look at your masks and most of them are Made-in-China, and if China knew it then why didn't China ramp up production? You're just anti-China that's all and blaming China when your governments did not react to what's happening in China. Money is flowing out of China into your countries with each purchase, so why are you blaming Chinese people for buying those medical supplies legally? Look at the USA hijacking a shipment of medical supplies bound for Germany from China and what sort of behaviour is this?
    1
  21844.  @panchovilla3493  The bat soup coronavirus origins myth have long been debunked by experts but people like you just ignore it. Source: No, Coronavirus Was Not Caused by 'Bat Soup'–But Here's What Researchers Think May Be to Blame health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/coronavirus-bat-soup
    1
  21845.  @nuk3fishydude902  I cite sources to support my arguments. If you disagree then you're always welcome to attempt to refute my points.
    1
  21846.  @nuk3fishydude902  Sorry, I mistook your earlier post ("神州 Shenzhou what an expert") as sarcasm.
    1
  21847. Some call him a monster, others call him a pragmatist. Nevertheless, his passing marks the end of the last American diplomat capable of cold-hearted but strategic thinking. The remaining diplomats like Jake Sullivan, John Kirby, Anthony Blinken can't hold a candle.
    1
  21848. China is now certain that the U.S makes promises with words, but breaks said promises with actions.
    1
  21849. On the other hand, the Russian currency is ranked the strongest performing currency this year.
    1
  21850. Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    1
  21851.  @MarkYeung1  Video: China increases coal production to ensure winter supplies, easing energy shortage youtu.be/7sHZ74VLkUc Chinese coal mining firms are increasing production ahead of winter, with some coal mining enterprises running at full capacity in a bid to ensure supplies. China said it has raised daily coal production by over 1 million tonnes (1.1 million tons) as of October 2021, in a bid to ease an energy shortage.
    1
  21852.  @MarkYeung1  "These are good governments. They put people ahead of politics." Developed countries like Canada are buying up and hoarding Covid-19 vaccines, leaving little to none for the developing countries. Canadian government has secured enough vaccines for 5x it's population size. As of March 2021, Canada had secured over 300 million doses, enough to cover their population 5 times over. youtu.be/2ty2J0s2W0c?t=182 Imagine 1 Canadian having access to 5 Covid-19 vaccines, while elsewhere in the world, 10 Africans have to fight for access to 1 Covid-19 vaccine.
    1
  21853.  @VashtheStampede007  Agreed. This  @mark yeung  guy spout a lot of untrue facts, it's like he just blurt out what the Western MSM says without bothering to verify the information beforehand.
    1
  21854.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Canada does what is best for the Canadian people." Then why did Canadian border authorities detained Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou? That caused deterioration of Canada-China relations and wasn't what's best for the people of Canada. And it still doesn't take into account that Canada buying enough Covid-19 vaccines for 5x it's population will prolong the pandemic since the developing countries don't have the necessary vaccines to combat the coronavirus. Imagine 1 Canadian having access to 5 Covid-19 vaccines, while elsewhere in the world, 10 Africans have to fight for access to 1 vaccine. This is only prolonging the pandemic that's all.
    1
  21855. Russian drones not only employ artificial intelligence but also night-vision goggles.
    1
  21856. Xi 习 sounds more like "C" or "See"
    1
  21857.  @strnglhld  "神州 Shenzhou AKA being assaulted by an old ugly communist party official." Where's the allegations of sexual assault? I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and she previously had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several years, but where are the allegations of sexual assault in her post?
    1
  21858.  @strnglhld  "神州 Shenzhou She said that she was made to have relations with Zhang Gaoli without her consent." Could you point out where she said such a thing? I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and she had known Zhang Gaoli since seven years ago, and the sex she had with him was consensual. Peng Shuai wrote: "Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well." So according to Peng Shuai's post, she consented to the sex, then what allegations of sexual assault are you talking about?
    1
  21859.  @avocado2567  Do you have evidence that Peng Shuai was forced to say that she didn't get assaulted in the interview, and that the interviewer was not a real reporter?
    1
  21860.  @strnglhld  "神州 Shenzhou I've read it, and it certainly says she was coerced into sex. What do you think the larger context of the post was?" Where are the allegations of sexual assault in her post then? The larger context of Peng Shuai's post was that it's a lovers quarrel and there are no true victims and both sides are to blame. Here's an explanation of the context by someone who knows Chinese, Lie Debunker youtu.be/cvTUvvePJYg You said: "isn't it quite odd how China reacted afterward?" As far as I know, the Chinese government has been largely silent on the issue and not said anything about it. The closest thing was the Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson saying that _"China opposes the politicisation of sports." that's the most we've heard from the government about the issue. You said: "Pointing to one Reddit post that Chinese people have colonized in the comments section doesn't erase ANY of that." Now you're just seemingly being racist against Chinese people that's all here with your words. I mean, who else to translate Chinese language if not Chinese people ourselves? You yourself can't even quote me the allegations of sexual assault in Peng Shuai's post, yet you're complaining about "Chinese people colonizing" Reddit?
    1
  21861.  @strnglhld  This "Vivian" also copied other people's posts other than mine, I don't control what she/he choose to post.
    1
  21862.  @avocado2567  Where's your evidence that Peng Shuai was forced to say that she didn't get assaulted in the interview, and that the interviewer was not a real reporter? Here's an interview with Peng Shuai by a reporter from Singapore newspaper Lianhe Zaobao and Peng Shuai denies the accusation of sexual assault in her post, saying in Mandarin "I have never said or written that anyone has sexually assaulted me, I have to clearly stress this point." Video:youtu.be/ZF9Owb9uSOE
    1
  21863. "China’s reputation is really bad around the world" According to World Tourism Rankings as of 2015, China is the 4th most visited country in the world, after France, United States, and Spain, with 56.9 million international tourists per year. China is also the most visited Asian country, receiving more visitors than even Japan, Korea and India. Source: World Tourism Rankings wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings
    1
  21864. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  21865. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  21866. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  21867. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  21868. If you read their constitution, it says Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  21869. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, if you read their constitution.
    1
  21870.  @michaelkatz275  A report by Hurun Global Rich List 2021 indicated that China surpassed the United States to become the first country with more than 1,000 dollar-denominated tycoons, with 1,058 billionaires compared with 696 in the US.
    1
  21871.  @michaelkatz275  The Chinese government is cracking down on corruption, and some of these Chinese millionaires and billionaires may have acquired their wealth through underhanded means, so they might be panicking and trying the send their money overseas to other countries.
    1
  21872.  @michaelkatz275  You said: "Yes it is true, the Chinese government does tell the billionaires what to do." Meanwhile in the U.S, it's the reverse, and the billionaires tell the US government what to do.
    1
  21873.  @michaelkatz275  "神州 Shenzhou Really? Who?" Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, George Soros, and many other such oligarchs.
    1
  21874. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21875. 哈哈 这评论太牛逼了！
    1
  21876. Who is the aggressor nation sending warships and aircraft carrier strike group from halfway across the globe to our waters? US warships like USS McCain and USS Fitzgerald also collide with merchant vessels causing hurt and death of US navy men.
    1
  21877. People all over the world enjoy Chinese cuisine and in many major cities there is usually a "Chinatown" where people can enjoy delicious Chinese food. Why mock people's tastes then?
    1
  21878. aPerson If you enjoyed dog meat then good for you. You can come visit the Yulin dog festival in Guanxi province, China, if you want to partake of dog meat cuisine there.
    1
  21879. About "running other countries into debt" Chinese banks do not force those countries to loan money from us, and its those countries own choice if they choose to borrow more than they can pay off. Why blame China for being willing to loan them money? Why didn't they seek loans from IMF or other banks?
    1
  21880. @owen coleman How exactly is China more evil than USA? China today is not at war with any country and instead of making war on others (like what USA is doing in Middle East) China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, ports, airports, dams, powerstations in less developed countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Angola, etc. Nobody force those countries to borrow loans from Chinese banks if they don't want to. Western banks like IMF refuse to grant them loans, because these countries are plagued by unstable governments, social unrest and civil wars. That's why Chinese banks charge higher interest rates because of the higher risks involved. About surveillance state, don't Westerners often complain that Chinese people are rude, spit in public, smoke in public, jaywalk, disobey traffic rules, speed past red lights, etc, when not all Chinese are like that? China is introducing Social Credit System to discourage such unsavoury behaviour and penalise people who exhibit such behaviour. If they persist until their scores falls too low, then they will be barred from buying plane tickets to fly to other countries and make nuisance of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve to become acceptable for them to travel again. And do you have any accurate source about organs being illegally harvested in China? If so, then why nobody step forward and present evidence to International Court of Justice for example? Did President Trump ever mention organ harvesting in China to President Xi? Or did Russian President Putin? Or German Chancellor Merkel? Or British PM May? Or Indian PM Modi? Or Japanese PM Abe? Then why do still believe such rumors of organ harvesting in China?
    1
  21881. @owen coleman Why are you resorting to insulting me in Chinese? Nobody point a gun at those countries and force them to do business with China if they don't want to. Here are some infrastructure projects in Africa that are funded by Chinese for example: 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Poty Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China youtube.com/watch?v=TtduKDpy4oc China has done much to help improve African countries in just decades as compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  21882. @owen coleman Under old Chinese laws, it was legal to harvest organs from prisoners sentenced to death row only with the prior consent of the criminal or permission of relatives. In my opinion, at least those healthy organs will be put to use to save someone else's life, instead of being wasted and buried with the body, rotting away underneath the earth. But since 2014, China has abolished this practice and China has among the lowest number of organ transplants in the world, and transplant waiting lists are long in China. China is not alone in having low transplant rates in Asia, even richer countries such as Japan and Singapore fall far short of Western countries. Source: China ends the practice of harvesting organs from executed prisoners economist.com/graphic-detail/2014/12/30/organ-harvest
    1
  21883. @owen coleman I've read your source and according to the report by David Kilgour, David Matas and Ethan Gutmann and according to the report, they claim that China reported 10,000 organ transplantation when it was actually 100,000 organ transplants. Where did they get the evidence for such a bloated figure? According to World Health Organization, there were an an estimated 135,860 organ transplants worldwide in 2016 alone Source: Estimated number of organ transplantations worldwide in 2016 statista.com/statistics/398645/global-estimation-of-organ-transplantations/ So you mean Kilgour and Gutmann just exaggerate the number of organ transplants in China from 10,000 to 100,000 (which is almost as much as the rest of the world combined!) and you just believe them at their word? Where does China get all the doctors, surgeons, and hospitals to host as many organ transplants as rest of the world put together?
    1
  21884. @owen coleman Americans did not build up China, Chinese people build up our country. Studies have shown that Chinese workers earned only 10 cents to every dollar of profit that Western companies like Apple and Nike made. But despite these low salary, Chinese workers persevered through poor working conditions, slowly earning billions of 10 cents over the years, and painstakingly saving up enough 10 cents to eventually lift 700 million out of poverty in just 40 years. Just for comparison, the entire population of African continent is 1.2 billion people. So in effect, China lifted a number equal to HALF of Africa's entire population out of poverty in decades as compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. These phenomena has been termed "unprecedented" in human history (even by Western scholars) and it is believed that other countries today won't be able to reproduce what China has done with poverty. Video: Historical Achievement: Take 700 Million People out of Poverty youtube.com/watch?v=onLbp4WMoz4
    1
  21885. @owen coleman Falun Dafa is illegal in China and is punishable by the death penalty. If you claim to have sufficient evidence, then why is it no world leader (like Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, Angela Merkel, Theresa May, Narendra Modi, Shinzo Abe, etc) has ever mentioned organ harvesting in China to Xi Jinping? It's because the organ harvest are all unproven rumors, that's why world leaders aren't bringing it up during UN discussions and summits, etc. Otherwise, if you have enough evidence then you are welcome to take China to court on this matter. If not, then why continue to believe such rumors spread by Falun Gong?
    1
  21886. @owen coleman Westerners also made use of Chinese inventions like paper, gunpowder and compass. Ancient Chinese had the Four Great Inventions 四大发明 which have greatly influenced rest of the world. Paper and Printing made the recording and transmission of knowledge much easier. The Compass made navigation much easier and dangerous journeys more safer and reliable. And Gunpowder has greatly changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners using our inventions? And about poverty in China, according to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 6.5% poverty and 96.4% literacy rate. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Falun Dafa was founded in 1992 (only 27 years ago) by Li Hongzhi and it hijacked existing practices from established religions like Taoism and Buddhism, and also traditional Chinese Qigong practices. This should already sound off alarm bells that Falun Dafa is a cult, not an actual religion. I mean, my parents are older than even this so-called "religion." And how exactly does China perform 100,000 organ transplants annually, given that the rest of the world performs about 130,000 organ transplants annually? You mean China performs almost as many transplants as the rest of the world combined? Where does China get all the doctors, surgeons, operating rooms, etc, to perform such bloated number of transplants? That Kilgour and Gutmann report just exaggerate transplants in China from 10,000 to 100,000 and you just believe their words like that?
    1
  21887. Jose Francisco Bano China claimed South China Sea Islands back in 1947, when Republic of China published the 11 dash line. Back then, during Philippines independence, they drew their national boundaries, which did not include the Spratly islands as part of Philippines territory. But only in 1970s did Philippines President Marcos suddenly started incorporating the Spratly Islands as part of Philippines territory.
    1
  21888. Jose Francisco Bano Back then, Republic of China followed Chinese methods of topography not Western methods. And many Chinese historical artifacts have been found in the South China Sea, such as pottery fragments from the Tang dynasty, Song dynasty, Yuan dynasty, Ming dynasty and Qing dynasty.
    1
  21889. Jose Francisco Bano China and Philippines both agreed that the issue should be settled bilaterally (country to country) but Philippines unilaterally chose to settle 3rd party arbitration by court, and did not even inform China of its decision. The Philippines had signed the Declaration of Conduct of Parties in South China Sea, and one of its points was to settle disputes through friendly consultations and negotiations by sovereign states directly concerned, but Philippines broke it agreement and unilaterally choose 3rd party arbitration by court, instead of bilateral negotiations.
    1
  21890. Jose Francisco Bano Philippines did not claim Scarborough Shoal as part of its territory during its independence from America, so how is Scarborough Shoal part of Philippines territory? Also, Philippines and China both agreed to settle the dispute bilaterally so why Philippines resort to 3rd party arbitration? Philippines did not inform China that it was taking the matter to court too. Also, for 3rd party arbitration, one of the criteria is that both parties have to be willing to accept 3rd party arbitration, but since China is not a willing party then the basic criteria hasn't been met.
    1
  21891. If President Trump wants to claim all the credit for this, then why don't Kim Jung Un just visit Washington directly for disarmament talks, rather than turning to Beijing? Americans need to face the fact that if not for China, USA would have zero chance to enter dialogue with North Korea at all. Even the last time US and North Korea talked was in Beijing, during the Six Party disarmament talks.
    1
  21892. The Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, Europe, USA and India. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  21893. The irony is that de-dollarization is being brought about by the US's actions themselves. As Putin said, it's not Russia that rejected the dollar, it's the dollar that rejected Russia.
    1
  21894. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my "which countries make top house hold appliances? " In 2020, six household appliances manufacturers worldwide surpassed 10 billion U.S. dollars in revenue with Haier Smart Home leading the ranking with around 36 billion U.S. dollars. The other companies with annual revenues north of 10 billion U.S. dollars are LG, Whirlpool, Midea, BSH Home Appliances, and Electrolux.
    1
  21895. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  21896. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my China literally publishes more research articles in the world than any other, including the U.S. (Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by number of scientific and technical journal articles)
    1
  21897. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my Chinese company Haier ranks top among household appliances company in terms of revenue.
    1
  21898. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my China publishes the most research papers in the world, more than the U.S.
    1
  21899. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my "神州 Shenzhou that is in china where people are forced to buy their products." Have you actually been to China? People in China aren't force to buy Haier's products, otherwise why do other foreign appliance brands exist in China then? But the fact remains that Haier is the home appliance company with the highest revenue in the world.
    1
  21900. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my So Chinese household appliance company Haier ranking top in the world in terms of revenue, is clearly not an example of weakness isn't it?
    1
  21901. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my YouTube has deleted my comment about competition, because I brought how capitalism created American monopolies like Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon who dominate their respective fields and having eliminated the competition from smaller American firms. Whereas China has an anti-monopoly law targeting anti-competitive practices in Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, in order to free up space for smaller Chinese companies to thrive, thus creating competition though innovation.
    1
  21902. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my Capitalism actually favors monopolies that dominate their respective industries, gradually eliminating competition from smaller firms. That's how Apple, Facebook, Google, Amazon roll. Whereas China has an anti-monopoly law targeting anti-competitive practices in Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, in order to free up space for smaller Chinese companies to thrive, thus creating competition though innovation.
    1
  21903.  @CherylCheah100  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21904.  @漫步在林荫小道  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21905. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my China is home to around 80-90 percent of the world's rare earth metals production, and REMs are used in virtually every high tech device today, such as phone screens, monitors, LED, solar panels, batteries, fiber optics, so the U.S ultimately has to rely on China in this sector.
    1
  21906. USA can only temporarily send warships and aircraft carriers to South China Sea, but it can't stop China from building permanent islands and fortify them with SAM sites, etc. After maybe 5-10 years in the future, China would have built 5-10 years worth of islands and military infrastructure, whereas USA will have nothing tangible to show for its patrols.
    1
  21907. It is apparent that sanctions do not work on North Korea. This is a country that has access to nuclear weapons, so the government doesn't want to push N. Korea over the edge and start a war in peaceful East Asia. Such a war would result in the deaths of many Chinese, Japanese and Koreans, and would also erase the decades of progress made in East Asia. It is more viable to support diplomatic talks between N. Korea, S. Korea and USA, rather than starting an unwanted war here.
    1
  21908. Indeed. China, India, Russia & the global south represent the majority of the world's population, and it's our voices that will fight to transition into a multi-polar world dominated by different voices, rather than the old uni-polar world dominated by the voice of the United States and its "allies".
    1
  21909.  @bens8013  "1. Do you believe that if Russia got Crimea and the occupied territories that they would just stop there?" Putin has spoken of the concept of a Russkiy Mir ("Russian World"). It's an region that's not defined by territorial boundaries, but by where the Russian people themselves are situated. Back during the Soviet Union, many Russians travelled out of Russia to the various satellite states (mostly to Ukraine) in order to work on various Soviet projects. Crimea was also historically part of Russian Empire but in 1954, the Bolsheviks decided to transfer Crimea to Ukraine to commemorate the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia. However, the abrupt Soviet Union collapse in 1991 meant that overnight, many Russians suddenly found themselves trapped outside of the motherland. Most Russians ended up in Ukrainian territories such as Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, etc. Just imagine if you left your hometown to work in another region in the country, only to find that overnight, that region becomes independent and you automatically become a citizen of that new state, even though your home is elsewhere. That's why Putin feels sorry for those Russians who've been abandoned after the Soviet Union dissolution. Ukraine had become independent after USSR collapse, and Crimea had became a republic. The 1991 referendum in Crimea pushed for more independence from Ukraine and closer links with Russia. But in 1995, the Republic of Crimea was forcefully abolished and firmly brought under Ukraine control. After the 2014 Maidan uprising, a referendum held in Crimea revealed that the overwhelming majority (97%) voted to join the Russian Federation. Given the history I outlined above, Putin sought to bring back those people into the Russian world, and that's why Crimea was annexed. So to answer your question, Putin wants to make Russians who overnight became citizens of a foreign country, feel safe and not abandoned by their motherland. Ukraine has many territories with significant Russian populations such as Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, and Putin seeks to bring these territories back into the Russian world. It's because of the complicated history of the Soviet Union and its sudden collapse left behind unresolved issues.
    1
  21910. A recent survey for kids showed: Most Chinese kids' dream: Astronaut Most American kids' dream: YouTuber
    1
  21911.  @alduin1289  Haven't you heard of 李子柒Liziqi's YouTube channel? Her YouTube channel has more than 2.3 billion views and 15.2 million subscribers, as verified on May 12th 2021, which is a Guinness World Record for "the most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube". So it's entirely possible for Chinese kids to become a YouTube star, even while living in China.
    1
  21912.  @itsblitz4437  Since you know that there's a difference between weapons grade nuclear materials and non weapons grade, then why can't they use nuclear power then?
    1
  21913.  @acdragonrider  During Unit 731, the Japanese soldiers and doctors conducted horrible experiments on Chinese prisoners. Men, women and children were subjected to live vivisection, often without anesthesia and usually ending with the death of the victim. Organs were removed, limbs were frozen and amputated to study blood loss, and even reattached to opposite sides of the body and these were conducted while the patients were alive because it was thought that the death of the subject would affect the result. Some unlucky prisoners had their stomachs surgically removed and the esophagus reattached to the intestines, just to see how long humans can survive without the stomach. The sexual crimes in Unit 731 were the worst. Prisoners were infected with STDs like Syphilis, and forced at gunpoint to spread it to other prisoners through sex. Women were forcefully raped and impregnated, and they were vivisected at different stages of infection, so that internal and external organs could be observed as the disease progressed. Some Japanese soldiers even participated in the impregnation process and dissected unborn children they fathered with female prisoners. Can you imagine if you are prisoner in Unit 731, having your stomach removed and your gullet attached to your intestine, just to see how long you can live? Or imagine being injected with STDs and then being forced at gunpoint to spread it? Why not simply inject all the prisoners, instead of forcing such humiliating acts upon them? What did Chinese people do to deserve this? All Chinese people wanted to do was defend our lands, and protect our homes and loved ones from the invaders, but the Japanese invaded our lands, killed our men, raped our women and conducted inhumane experiments on our kids.
    1
  21914.  @Finnbearl61r  I never questioned the right of a founding member of NATO to be in NATO. I'm saying that Russia is an European country after all, why can't they be in NATO, while a country from across the Pacific Ocean can be in it? And Russia applied to join NATO.
    1
  21915.  @andrewvoorhees4062  If anything, by advertising his sponsor's products, Cyrus has indeed shown his true colors that he's not paid by the Chinese government. Otherwise he wouldn't be including sponsors in his vids.
    1
  21916. What makes you say that?
    1
  21917.  @MarkYeung1  Putin launched the special military operation in order to stop Ukraine from shelling Russian-speaking people in the republics of Donetsk and Luhansk. He was doing it to protect the Russian people living in the two republics.
    1
  21918.  @MarkYeung1  Putin was doing it to order to stop the killing of ethnic Russians living in Donetsk and Luhansk. He was doing it to protect the Russian people living in the two republics.
    1
  21919. I wonder what's going to happen to all the Palestinian diaspora who've been displaced overseas over the decades? Would they be allowed to return to their homes if a two-state solution is attained?
    1
  21920. @Monke Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    1
  21921.  @MD-bp6mz  Why don't you tell all the non-Native Americans, Canadians and Australians to Get Out of America and Australia and leave those lands to Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals then?
    1
  21922. Indians be like: "Welcome to India, Jason!"
    1
  21923.  @marcoreviews  About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    1
  21924.  @userobd9528  Capitalism is where the rich corporations control the government. In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned Chinese companies for China's benefit, reining in companies when they've strayed too far. Whereas in the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary American taxpayers.
    1
  21925. Yogi Bear cartoon reference in your first line 😉
    1
  21926.  @Drew-sy2bn  You said: "Mao took advantage of their weakness and started the civil war..." Incorrect. The Chinese Civil War was started when Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek carried out a violent suppression of the communist members within the KMT, in what's known as the Shanghai Massacre of April 12. An estimated 5,000 –10,000 communists were killed in that purge.
    1
  21927. Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, hospitals, schools, for everyone on Earth. Yet we still have starving people, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking healthcare, because of capitalism. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." The Earth's resources are finite and capitalism seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profits, whereas communism is at least dedicated to allocating resources according to needs.
    1
  21928.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "神州 Shenzhou polls conducted by the Strait Times showing that 95% of Singaporeans support the sanctions towards Russia." The figure is incorrect. The Blackbox poll poll found that 95%of 1,711 Singaporeans interviewed supported or sympathised most closely with Ukraine. With respect to sanctions on Russia, the move was supported by 60% of Singaporeans polled by Blackbox, with 35% saying they were unsure or had no opinion. Did you actually read the poll carefully?
    1
  21929.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Singaporean government listened to its people" Actually, Singapore government slapped those sanctions on Russia without prior consent of ordinary Singaporeans. The poll that 6 out of 10 Singaporeans supported sanctions, was conducted only after the sanctions have been imposed.
    1
  21930.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou Singapore is surrounded by much larger countries." From what I understand, Singapore has actually threatened to invade larger countries like Malaysia if ever their water supply is ever cut off. Another thing is that Russia is so far away from Singapore, and while some ASEAN countries have condemned Russia's special military operation, only Singapore has slapped sanctions on Russia, thus earning Singapore a place on Russia's blacklist of unfriendly countries.
    1
  21931. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21932. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  21933. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21934.  @xerozero976  What's wrong with Xi's sister being a Canadian citizen and owning $1 billion dollar assets? Do you have factual evidence of her corruption? Then what's wrong Xi's family applying for overseas citizenship? I mean, did you know that Trump's niece is learning Mandarin Chinese? What's your point?
    1
  21935.  @xerozero976   @xero zero  President Xi Jinping's salary is just $22,000 a month, even lower than Indian PM Narendra Modi's salary of $30,000 a month. Yet you're claiming Xi Jinping is corrupt? Where's your evidence?
    1
  21936.  @xerozero976  Although it's a difficult goal, there is a possibility that high school dropouts can still enroll in university courses or pick up their education later, what makes you automatically link not-attending-high-school-yet-entering-university as corruption? Maybe President Xi had tuition classes on calculus on the side.
    1
  21937.  @xerozero976  If Xi An'an relinquished her Chinese citizenship to become a Canadian citizen, so how does it violate China's dual citizenship law? If Xi's sister is able to earn money and have $1 billion dollars in assets in Canada, then what's the problem? As far as I know, Xi An'an is not a member of the Communist Party of China, so what's your point?
    1
  21938.  @xerozero976  Earlier you mention 53 million homeless but you said 744,000 people were displaced and 63.46 million were affected, but where is your source for your figure of 53 million homeless?
    1
  21939.  @xerozero976  Where's your evidence that Xi Jinping's sister got her money from him? You just throw out accusations without proof of your claims? President Xi Jinping is among the world's lowest paid world leaders, yet you're accusing him if corruption without proof?
    1
  21940.  @xerozero976  You said: "Record breaking genius was born in China" As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  21941.  @xerozero976  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA. The test is given every three years to 15-year-olds around the world and measures their knowledge in reading, science and mathematics. PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    1
  21942.  @michaelkatz275  Those politicians want the U.S-China relations to deteriorate further, possibly resulting in an war that is of no benefit to both our countries peoples. Whereas people like Cyrus Janssen consistently promote the message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" between the U.S and China.
    1
  21943.  @GMK189-f2k  P President Xi's anti-graft crackdown has indicted more than 100,000 people, including over 120 high-ranking officials, including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders, yet you claim I've been fed propaganda by the Communist Party of China?
    1
  21944.  @GMK189-f2k  President Xi is literally tackling corruption in the Communist Party of China, and more than 100,000 people have been indicted for corruption in the crackdown. The campaign has netted over 120 high-ranking officials, including about a dozen high-ranking military officers, several senior executives of state-owned companies, and five national leaders.
    1
  21945.  @GMK189-f2k  Look at how "tigers and flies" had been caught under President Xi's campaign
    1
  21946.  @GMK189-f2k  Don't worry, once China's Belt and Road Initiative (overland trade route connecting Europe to China and all the landlocked regions between) is complete, China's trade will be conducted overland.
    1
  21947.  @GMK189-f2k  President Xi is tackling corruption. As for semiconductors, Chinese company SMIC has made a chip breakthrough, demonstrating the capability to fabricate 7nm chips for semiconductors, defying U.S sanctions and possibly advancing its production technology by two generations.
    1
  21948.  @GMK189-f2k  Regarding semiconductors, Chinese company SMIC has made a chip breakthrough, demonstrating the capability to fabricate 7nm chips for semiconductors, defying U.S sanctions and possibly advancing its production technology by two generations. You're just looking down on China's achievements that's all.
    1
  21949.  @GMK189-f2k  Send the People's Liberation Army (world's largest land army) to due with the blockade. Also, China is indeed investing money into our people, China already has the world's highest number of STEM graduates (i.e graduates in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics). This implies that China is expected to play a larger role in these fields, given the sheer number of graduates in these fields. Countries With The Most STEM Graduates in 2016 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568, 000) 4. Russia (561, 000) 5. Iran (335, 000) 6. Indonesia (206, 000) 7. Japan (195, 000) ... Source: World Economic Forum
    1
  21950.  @GMK189-f2k  "神州 Shenzhou ….you forget that many of those STEM graduates immigrate to USA from around world." In recent years, China is experiencing what's called a "reverse brain drain" where intellectuals migrate from a developed country to a developing country. It's because China now offers much opportunities for such human capital, as well as overseas Chinese returning to the motherland due to rising anti-China sentiment in the West, such as the United States.
    1
  21951.  @GMK189-f2k  In recent years, China is experiencing what's called a "reverse brain drain" where intellectuals migrate from a developed country to a developing country. It's because China now offers much opportunities for such human capital, as well as overseas Chinese returning to the motherland due to rising sinophobic sentiment in the West, such as the United States.
    1
  21952.  @susanchin4117  Agreed, I have no doubt about it.
    1
  21953.  @kus4kus4  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  21954.  @kus4kus4  A geneticist from Cambridge University, Dr Peter Forster and his team have identified 3 Covid-19 strains (A, B, C) Type-A is believed to be strain that leaped from bats to humans (animal-to-human) and Type-B is mutated from Type-A and found predominantly in China, while Type-C is mutated from Type-B and found outside China in places like Singapore. Video: No proof that Covid-19 originated in Wuhan: Peter Forster youtu.be/AQQf2yoymu0 The interesting thing is that the Type-A (animal-to-human) is found predominantly outside East Asia, in USA and Europe.
    1
  21955.  @kus4kus4  But out of the 3 types (A, B, C) Type-A is believed to be the strain that leaped from bats to humans and its found predominantly outside East Asia, in USA and Europe. Source: Phylogenetic Network Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Genomes pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32269081/ which we have named A, B, and C, with A being the ancestral type according to the bat outgroup coronavirus. The A and C types are found in significant proportions outside East Asia, that is, in Europeans and Americans. In contrast, the B type is the most common type in East Asia.
    1
  21956.  @MisterHeroman  China's is also properly prepared.
    1
  21957.  @jcgrx2251  How to sanitise wet markets, you tell me? There are even wet markets in Japan and South Korea, here's Hakodate Wet Market in Japan. Video: Hakodate Seafood Market - Japan youtu.be/SskPtUAcUKQ
    1
  21958.  @kus4kus4  "IMO it's a lot safer than what I see in Wuhan (but still risky)" What bats have you seen in Wuhan? Which Wuhan market did you visit?
    1
  21959.  @brierobinson194  Why don't you preach you vegan message to the USA, the world's largest consumer of meat? Here's a list of countries by meat consumption per capita. List of countries by meat consumption in 2017 1. United States (98.60 kg/person) 2. Australia (94.61 kg/person) 3. Argentina (91.40 kg/person) 4. Uruguay (81.04 kg/person) 5. Israel (80.35 kg/person) 6. Brazil (78.60 kg/person) 7. The Netherlands (76.60 kg/person) 8. New Zealand (72.14 kg/person) 9. Chile (71.97 kg/person) 10. Canada (69.99 kg/person) ... 18. China (50.20 kg/person) ... Source: List of countries by meat consumption per capita wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_meat_consumption_per_capita#Accuracy
    1
  21960.  @kus4kus4  Here's another source debunking dogs, snakes, bats and rats being sold in Wuhan seafood market. Source: Are there really dogs, snakes, rats and bats for sale at the Wuhan market where coronavirus originated? observers.france24.com/en/20200204-china-debunked-coronavirus-dogs-snakes-rats-bats-wuhan-market-indonesia In short, these videos weren’t filmed in Wuhan or, indeed, anywhere else in China. Instead, they were filmed 3,400 kilometres away in Indonesia.
    1
  21961.  @MJ-oi6ul  Tulane virologist Robert Garry, PhD, and a team of researchers analyzed the genome sequence of Covid-19 and found no evidence that the virus was made in a laboratory or otherwise engineered. Video: Virologist explains origins of Covid-19 youtu.be/YLykxJqTBpU
    1
  21962.  @MJ-oi6ul  "China is the only country that changed its 'death' numbers, they are the ones probably lying" France suddenly increased its number of reports, because up until then, it had not counted deaths that had occurred outside of hospitals and previously only counted hospital deaths. Once they started counting deaths in nursing homes, the numbers increased dramatically. You're just anti-China and blaming China that's all. Video: Should China be blamed for Covid-19 youtu.be/PeaPeIvM_9E?t=60 Even in America, there are many unreported cases, deaths in nursing homes, because American does not have enough testing kits for everyone (contrary to what Trump claims).
    1
  21963.  @mdb2879  Which reporter was killed in Wuhan and made a last video?
    1
  21964.  @rosh_ediriweera  It has already been debunked that rats, snakes, dogs and cats are sold in Wuhan Seafood Market. Source: Are there really dogs, snakes, rats and bats for sale at the Wuhan market where coronavirus originated? observers.france24.com/en/20200204-china-debunked-coronavirus-dogs-snakes-rats-bats-wuhan-market-indonesia Also, right at the start of the video, the words ‘"Pasar EXTREAM Langowan" appear on the screen. The July 2019 posting says in the caption that it was filmed in Langowan, an area in Indonesia's North Sulawesi province. Journalists at news agency Agence France-Presse also pointed out that a sign at the start of the video reads "Kantar Pasor Langowan", which means “Office of the Langowan market”. In short, these videos weren’t filmed in Wuhan or, indeed, anywhere else in China. Instead, they were filmed 3,400 kilometres away in Indonesia.
    1
  21965.  @emmabutler1953  "because you all eat random wild animals unhygienically." Western countries also hunt wild animals like rabbits (for rabbit stew) quail, pheasant and other game animals for human consumption. Even the Australian eat kangaroo meat (and kangaroos are all wild animals) so why blame China? Till today, nobody knows the true origin of the coronavirus and scientists are still investigating.
    1
  21966.  @rosh_ediriweera  Source: No, Coronavirus Was Not Caused by 'Bat Soup'–But Here's What Researchers Think May Be to Blame health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/coronavirus-bat-soup
    1
  21967.  @rosh_ediriweera  "神州 Shenzhou Has there at least been 3 outbreaks off diseases from those markets?" What are the 3 outbreaks off diseases from those markets? Look at Bird Flu, Swine Flu, H1N1, MERS (Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome) or other virus outbreak occur regardless of wet markets, so closing down wet markets does not mean that virus outbreaks will disappear.
    1
  21968.  @rosh_ediriweera  "神州 Shenzhou then how come we are dealing with this" China had informed the World Health Organization of mysterious new virus strain on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had isolated the strain from multiple other flu viruses and by 7th Jan, China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO by 11th Jan. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    1
  21969.  @omarzaim6844  Wet Markets exist all over East Asia (China, Japan, Korea) South East Asia (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, etc) and even in Africa and South America, so why should all wet markets be banned? Because you say so?
    1
  21970.  @johnspinelli9396  Look at Bird Flu, Swine Flu, H1N1, MERS, and other virus outbreaks that occur regardless of wet markets. Banning wet markets doesn't stop virus outbreaks from happening, so why should China close our wet markets? Many other countries like Japan, Korea, South East Asia (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines) and even Spain have wet markets too.
    1
  21971.  @johnspinelli9396  The bat soup coronavirus origins myth have long been debunked by experts. Source: No, Coronavirus Was Not Caused by 'Bat Soup' health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/coronavirus-bat-soup Coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, Chinese scientists say analysis of genomic data from 93 samples of the novel coronavirus suggests it was imported from elsewhere. Source: Coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3051981/coronavirus-did-not-originate-wuhan-seafood-market-chinese About Chinese transparency, even President Trump has praised China's efforts and transparency regarding the coronavirus outbreak in January. Source: Trump: U.S. appreciates China's 'efforts and transparency' on coronavirus reuters.com/article/us-china-health-usa-trump/trump-u-s-appreciates-chinas-efforts-and-transparency-on-coronavirus-idUSKBN1ZN2IK
    1
  21972.  @johnspinelli9396  Now you're just being anti-China that's all. The coronavirus being manufactured in a lab has been debunked by experts. Video: Virologist explains origins of COVID-19 youtu.be/YLykxJqTBpU Tulane virologist Robert Garry, PhD, and a team of researchers analyzed the genome sequence of the novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and found no evidence that the virus was made in a laboratory or otherwise engineered.
    1
  21973.  @johnspinelli9396  Here's another source debunking Wuhan virology lab conspiracy. Source: The Wuhan Virus Is Not a Lab-Made Bioweapon foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/29/coronavirus-china-lab-mortality-virology-wuhan-virus-not-bioweapon/ You mock Chinese eating habits, but the French eat snails and horsemeat, British eat rabbit stew and Australians eat kangaroo meat, so who are you to mock China's eating habits?
    1
  21974.  @johnspinelli9396  "I am against China because they are Communist, which is the worst economic and political system ever thought of." Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  21975.  @johnspinelli9396  "Pandemics like this could have been stopped quicker if your country was democratic." When China impose lockdown on Wuhan, your democratic countries accused China of "draconian" measures so how would China being a democratic country stop this pandemic quicker? In the end, your democratic countries also imposed various degrees of lockdown on your own countries so why the double standards? China has informed World Health Organization of mysterious new virus strain on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had isolated the strain out of billions and identified it and by 7th Jan 2020, China had sequenced Covid-19 genome completely in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html So how does China being democratic equal to the pandemic getting stopped faster?
    1
  21976.  @johnspinelli9396  Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  21977.  @johnspinelli9396  Have you been on Chinese social media website like Sina Weibo, WeChat and so on? Chinese netizens criticise the government on social media all the time, how else to show you? What happened in Tiananmen Square? Tiananmen Square is a parade ground in Beijing where Mao Zedong proclaimed the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949 and where the portrait of Mao is hung. We recently held a massive military parade in Tiananmen Square celebrating 70 years of PRC's founding. Video: Highlights: China celebrates 70th anniversary with biggest ever military parade youtu.be/Lmp51YN-7wc
    1
  21978.  @johnspinelli9396  "Your country could have been even better if it had remained as the Republic of China before the communists took over." Well, why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 even lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? Back then, nobody expected the communists to succeed yet look at how history unfolded. During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage; they were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were lousy, and they had far fewer numbers (only 50 communist members in 1921) over the Kuomintang. The KMT on the other hand, had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training, and far superior numbers over the the communists. Securing victory against the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT. Yet the communists survived all KMT attempts to wipe them out, employing strategies like "Long March" (长征) and despite KMT's initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan). This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland. So why should China remain under the Republic of China when they lose the mainland to poorly trained, ill-equipped, heavily outnumbered, starving communists peasants?
    1
  21979.  @johnspinelli9396  What happened? Nothing happened in Tiananmen Square 1989, so why are you bringing it up again and again?
    1
  21980.  @emmabutler1953  Animals being torched alive? Even in Western countries, your chefs boil lobsters alive so what's the difference then? Video: Boiling Live Lobster youtu.be/IuqMYYjKX6Q (Warning: Footage may be disturbing for some viewers)
    1
  21981.  @emmabutler1953  What's the difference? Both food animals are cooked alive, here's another video of boiling lobster and nobody complains about boiling lobsters alive. (Warning: Footage may be disturbing for some viewers) Video: Boiling Lobsters Alive youtu.be/nSMzMExEIMo Who are you to apply preferential treatment to different food animals?
    1
  21982.  @instakee7040  Why should Chinese overthrow our government and "save China"? Overthrowing the Communist Party of China would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, so why China abandon our political system when it has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot)?
    1
  21983. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21984.  @MH-il1lk  He uses simple statistical proof. A bell curve for China with a 1.4 billion population will be steeper than than USA with 300 million by a factor of 4. What more proof do you need?
    1
  21985. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  21986.  @Anonymous------  It depends on how you define "mainland Chinese". Where do you think the Taiwan aborigines come from? The ancestors of today's Taiwan aborigines arrived on the island from the mainland from 5,000 years ago. Around 5,000 years ago, farmers from the southeast Chinese coast settled on the island. These people are believed to have been speakers of Austronesian languages, which dispersed from Taiwan across the islands of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The current Taiwanese aborigines are believed to be their descendants. - Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan
    1
  21987.  @Anonymous------  It doesn't matter whether branched out or not. The ancestors of the Taiwanese aborigines were farmers from mainland China and they arrived on the island some 5,000 years ago, which is traditionally the beginning of Chinese history. Around 5,000 years ago, farmers from the southeast Chinese coast settled on the island. These people are believed to have been speakers of Austronesian languages, which dispersed from Taiwan across the islands of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The current Taiwanese aborigines are believed to be their descendants. - Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan So if you consider the mainland Chinese of today as the same as 5,000 years ago in the mainland, then the Taiwanese aborigines and mainland Chinese do share a common ancestor.
    1
  21988.  @Anonymous------  What do you mean over 10,000 years ago? The Austronesian people arrived on Taiwan circa 1500 to 1000 BCE, which is around 5,000 years ago, around the beginning of Chinese history. Where did you get your figure of "over 10,000"?
    1
  21989.  @Anonymous------  There were most likely humans living on Taiwan 10,000 years ago. But the Austronesian migration occurred just 5,000 years ago, at around 1500 - 2000 BC, and the Austronesians have since displaced the original people living in Taiwan. And the current Taiwanese aborigines are the descendants of the Austronesians.
    1
  21990.  @Anonymous------  China has 5,000 years of history. The Austronesian migration to Taiwan coincides with the beginning of Chinese history, so in a sense, the Taiwan aborigines are from mainland China, since their ancestors were farmers who arrived on the island from the southeast Chinese coast.
    1
  21991.  @Anonymous------  You said: "less than 100 years, a big difference." You do realize that Han Chinese have been on Taiwan Island since 17th century, which is certainly more than 100 years ago.
    1
  21992.  @Anonymous------  But Han have appeared on Taiwan island since 17th century, more than 100 years ago. Taiwan's southwest was home to a Han Chinese population numbering close to 1,500 before the Dutch first came in 1623. And some of the Han today are descendants of those first Han who arrived around 300-400 years ago.
    1
  21993.  @Anonymous------  But Han Chinese have been present on Taiwan since 17th century. For example, in 1811 there were around 1,944,737 Han Chinese living in Taiwan, and that was more than a century ago, so the Han of today are also the descendants of the Han living in Taiwan since the 1700-1800s.
    1
  21994. @Al Castel Source: thetimes.co.uk/article/france-fights-terror-with-re-education-camps-plan-7wg9vrrgd If Westerners can do it, why not China?
    1
  21995. @Al Castel I literally gave you The Times article: France fights terror with camps for re-education
    1
  21996. @Al Castel About the South China Sea, the North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. …… But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    1
  21997. @Al Castel Source: Trump 'stands with' Saudi Arabia and defends crown prince over Khashoggi theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/20/trump-saudi-arabia-jamal-khashoggi-crown-prince
    1
  21998. @Al Castel Trump/USA is friends wit Saudi Arabia, that's all I'm saying.
    1
  21999. @Al Castel South Vietnam lost to North Vietnam, then why can't North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese? Hồ Chí Minh and the Vietnamese communists reunified Vietnam, then why can't Vietnam acknowledge that Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese? It was a civil war, so Vietnamese were killing Vietnamese during Vietnam War. Just like the Americans were killing Americans during American Civil War. Or Koreans during Korean War or any civil war for that matter.
    1
  22000.  S W  What's wrong with Chinese products? Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that the cost of living in other countries is kept lower than it should be. Think about the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other things like cars, housing, luxury brands, rent, tuition fees, and so on. Isn't that why many Americans often flock to Walmart because of their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money on living expenses to spend elsewhere?
    1
  22001.  S W  About using the money on innovation, the government is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending after the USA: Countries by Research and Development spending 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($275.0 billion) 3. Japan ($165.7 billion) 4. Germany ($118.8 billion) 5. South Korea ($91.6 billion) 6. India ($66.5 billion) 7. Brazil ($38.0 billion) 8. United Kingdom ($44.8 billion) 9. Russia ($42.6 billion) 10 France ($38.4 billion) ... Source: List of countries by research and development spending wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending#List In the West, researchers often have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    1
  22002.  S W  Besides smartphones, Chinese companies also dominate the civilian drone industry and Chinese company DJI is world's largest civilian drone-maker according to the following source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 top10drone.com/top-drone-companies/ Yet you claim Chinese products suck?
    1
  22003.  S W  China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. Source: Fishing Industry in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishing_industry_in_China China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_producing_countries_of_agricultural_commodities
    1
  22004.  S W  China is world's most populous country, so statistically speaking, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  22005.  S W  Where's all the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? Mainland China has Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, but where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? China is home to many of the world's largest banks including ICBC, China Construction Bank, AgBank, Bank of China, Bank of Communications, Postal Savings Bank of China, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank (China), Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, China CITIC Bank, China Minsheng Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Hua Xia Bank, Bank of Beijing, China Guangfa Bank, Bank of Shanghai, Bank of Jiangsu, China Zheshang Bank and so on. Source: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks#By_total_assets So how can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  22006.  S W  Besides Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE etc, China has produced successful Internet companies like Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, Suning.com, Bytedance (Tik Tok), Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, Kuaishou, Trip.com, Pinduoduo, Sina Corp, Sohu, and numerous successful Internet companies. Source: List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies#List But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  22007.  S W  "神州 Shenzhou internationally, they look at the whole picture like a country's GDP instead of a few companies." And mainland China has world's 2nd largest GDP and the world's largest, if you compare GDP by PPP, so how can Taiwan GDP even compare to the mainland?
    1
  22008.  S W  "神州 Shenzhou you are assuming everyone is gifted evenly." No, I'm using bellcurves to show that China has (statistically speaking) 4x the population of the United States, so China should have 4 geniuses to every single American genius. Look at the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA and Chinese students scored the highest in all three subjects in reading, science and mathematics. PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    1
  22009.  S W  "神州 Shenzhou i have a more accurate measurement. i am a customer. customer is always right." Apparently, you're a biased anti-China customer then. I already shown that Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, Bytedance (Tik Tok) are among the most successful Chinese companies in the world, where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland? Even apart from Huawei, Xiaomi was started in 2010. Today it's one of the world's most popular smartphones. In India, it's number one. Video: How Xiaomi broke out of China to go global | CNBC Reports youtu.be/291DlKa7iIU
    1
  22010.  S W  About innovation in China, China publishes more research papers than any other in the world, over a wide range of topics such as physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences. Countries by published scientific papers in 2018: 1. China (528,263 articles) 2. United States (422,808 articles) 3. India (135,788 articles) 4. Germany (104,396 articles) 5. Japan (98,793 articles) 6. United Kingdom (97,681 articles) 7. Russia (81,579 8. Italy (71,240 articles) 9. South Korea (66,376 articles) ... Source: List of countries by number of scientific and technical journal articles wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_scientific_and_technical_journal_articles
    1
  22011.  S W   Amazon? Chinese company Alibaba's Taobao has already overtaken Amazon as an e-commerce platform and most highly valued online retailer.
    1
  22012.  S W  For the first time, China has overtaken the United States in terms of the total number of science publications, according to statistics compiled by the US National Science Foundation (NSF). Source: China declared world’s largest producer of scientific articles nature.com/articles/d41586-018-00927-4 The agency’s report, released on 18 January, documents the United States’ increasing competition from China and other developing countries that are stepping up their investments in science and technology.
    1
  22013.  S W  You can't refute my points so you just mock China's achievements that's all? China publishes more books than any other country in the world according to the following source: Countries by books published 1. China (440,000 books) 2. United States (304,912 books) 3. United Kingdom (184,000 books) 4. Japan (139,078 books) 5. Russia (101,981 books) 6. Germany (93,600 books) ... Source: Books published per country per year wikipedia.org/wiki/Books_published_per_country_per_year#List_of_countries According to UNESCO, this is an important index of standard of living, education, and of a country's self-awareness.
    1
  22014.  S W  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    1
  22015.  S W  China is developing Xinjiang, here's a short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  22016.  S W  Why don't the West support Catalonia's independence from Spain then? Or Hawaii's independence from the United States?
    1
  22017.  S W  About Education in China, Chinese universities produce the most STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) out of any other country in the world. Countries With The Most STEM Graduates 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/02/02/the-countries-with-the-most-stem-graduates-infographic/ This implies that China is going to play a much larger role in the STEM fields, given the sheer number of graduates produced in these fields.
    1
  22018.  S W  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  22019.  S W  About Technology in China, China is home to one of top five world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) Video: Sunway TaihuLight named world's fastest supercomputer youtu.be/KEdsrT1mFAU Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion).
    1
  22020.  S W  "神州 Shenzhou americans are the first one in space." That's FALSE, it was the Soviet Union under the communists that launched the world's first artificial satellite, Sputnik-1 on October 4, 1957. On October 4, 1957, the Soviet Union sent the beach ball-sized satellite, Sputnik 1 into space. The launch grabbed the world’s attention because it was at the height of the Cold War.
    1
  22021.  S W  China's Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) supercomputer was actually manufactured without the use of US chips. TaihuLight, which is installed at China's National Supercomputing Center in Wuxi, uses ShenWei CPUs developed by Jiangnan Computing Research Lab in Wuxi. The operating system is a Linux-based Chinese system called Sunway Raise. Source: China builds world’s fastest supercomputer without U.S. chips computerworld.com/article/3085483/china-builds-world-s-fastest-supercomputer-without-u-s-chips.html
    1
  22022.  S W  "神州 Shenzhou americans are the first one in space." Soviet Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin was the first man in space. On April 12, 1961, Soviet cosmonaut, Yuri Gagarin, made history at the age of 27 by completing a single orbit of Earth in approximately 108 minutes.
    1
  22023.  S W  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    1
  22024.  S W  About research spending, China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending Countries by Research and Development spending 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($275.0 billion) 3. Japan ($165.7 billion) 4. Germany ($118.8 billion) 5. South Korea ($91.6 billion) 6. India ($66.5 billion) 7. Brazil ($38.0 billion) 8. United Kingdom ($44.8 billion) 9. Russia ($42.6 billion) 10 France ($38.4 billion) ... Source: List of countries by research and development spending wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending#List In the West, researchers often have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    1
  22025. China took at least 4 decades to industrialize to where we are today. Trump want's to achieve industrialization in USA in just 4 years!
    1
  22026.  @fannyalbi9040  U.S elections function like a sort of pressure release valve, temporarily relieving pressure and Americans feel satisfied, until the next buildup.
    1
  22027.  @mandarinandthetenrings2201  "神州 Shenzhou It doesn't need oil from Saudi Arabia." Then why'd Joe Biden meet with Saudi Arabian prince to get Saudi Arabia to increase oil production, if the U.S is oil independent?
    1
  22028.  @mandarinandthetenrings2201  "神州 Shenzhou It doesn't need oil from Saudi Arabia." Then why did Joe Biden visit the Saudi Arabian prince (MBS) to get Saudi Arabia to increase oil production, if the U.S is oil independent?
    1
  22029.  @raystechnosolutionsbarcode7071  American healthcare workers look overwhelmed, tired, overworked and ill-equipped, facing shortage of masks, gloves, goggles, faceshields, PPE suits and ventilators, and what does US government does about? State governments have to bid for the medical supplies. Whereas Chinese doctors and nurses look well-equipped in comparison.
    1
  22030.  @seaofgreenseeds6104  Here's a look inside Chinese BYD mask factory producing 5,000,000 masks a day. Video: China: Factory produces 5 million masks a day in bid to supply shortfall youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw?t=17
    1
  22031.  @willymac5036  During peacetime mission, China's J-20 stealth aircraft are fitted with radar reflectors (Luneburg lens) to increase it's visibility during training for safety and training purposes due to the potential for accidents and identification from other aircraft or ground installations. That's why India can detect Chinese J-20 during peacetime. Even the US stealth fighter F-35 use radar reflectors during peacetime training. In a real war, the People's Liberation Army Airforce would remove the radar reflectors from our J-20.
    1
  22032.  @willymac5036  About China's stealth detection breakthroughs in 2011, 2014, 2016, 2019, don't you know stealth and detection technology is always ever-upgrading? It's an arms race to try and outdo each other's stealth and detection capabilities and China has unveiled our YLC-8B radar array, which integrates the traditional detection method of mechanical scanning with advanced phased array technology and is best known for being able to detect stealth aircraft. Video: China unveils anti stealth radar on World Radar Expo youtu.be/LzRMWRy3AnE Fourth-generation air surveillance radars can be rapidly deployed, and are powerful enough to detect some low orbiting satellites.
    1
  22033.  @jasonburris9576  How is the Republic of China considered the rightful government of China? Didn't the ROC lose the mainland to the communists and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage; they were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were crappy, and they had far fewer numbers (only 50 communist members in 1921) over the Kuomintang. The KMT on the other hand, had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training, and far superior numbers over the the communists. Securing victory against the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT. Yet the communists survived all KMT attempts to wipe them out, employing strategies like "Long March" (长征) and despite KMT's initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan). This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland.
    1
  22034.  @jasonburris9576  Look at China today and China is currently the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, its manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ("Made in Taiwan" used to be commonplace, now it's been largely replaced by "Made in China") Taiwan's military has failed to deliver on their promise to retake the mainland and it now relies on USA for weapons imports.
    1
  22035.  @jasonburris9576  Your mind is closed to anything else concerning that? During the Chinese Civil War, nobody expected the communists to succeed, yet here we are today, so why are you seemingly denying reality? The communists were mostly poorly trained peasants, ill-equipped and heavily outnumbered and yet the succeeded in overthrowing the ROC from mainland China, so why shouldn't the CCP be allowed to govern China?
    1
  22036.  @jasonburris9576  "I hope one day the communist government falls and would be glad to see the roc take its rightful place." Why do you want the communist government to collapse? China today is currently the world's 2nd largest economy, so CCP's collapse would send economic shock waves throughout world markets and possibly result in global recession as Chinese investments dry up and Chinese companies close down and fire their employees. So why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China and possibly impact the rest of the world?
    1
  22037.  @justinlance4872  What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  22038.  @justinlance4872  Granted, the Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, Europe, USA and India. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  22039.  @justinlance4872  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china And that's despite China being under communist party rule, so what makes you think "any democracy will be the perfect government?" Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  22040.  @justinlance4872  Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that inflation in America is kept to a minimum and the cost of living in America is lower than it should be. I mean, think of the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursuits like cars, housing, luxury brands, school fees, doctor's fees, hospital fees, and so on. Why'd Americans flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices then?
    1
  22041.  @justinlance4872  China has lifted 700 million people out of poverty in just 40 years, whereas the whole rest of the world only lifted 150 million by comparison. Video: Historical achievement: Take 700 million out of poverty youtu.be/CljWffPgmG8 "China has lifted 728 million people out of poverty by international standards. The whole rest of the world has only lifted 152 million." - John Ross, Well-known columnist in UK, Former Deputy mayor of London.
    1
  22042.  @justinlance4872  I cited Wikipedia yes, but the data for China's poverty is obtained from the World Bank itself, so how is it not accurate as a source for China's poverty? Here's the actual data from the World Bank website itself. Source: Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day (2011 PPP) (% of population) - China data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.DDAY?locations=CN I mean, you claim my sources are inaccurate, but you don't even provide a source of your own that claims China's poverty is over 75%.
    1
  22043.  @肥皂-e6n  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  22044.  @thiambengkhor2647  Well, at the very least so that Americans get to purchase Huawei products and enjoy them in USA, like Chinese people do.
    1
  22045.  @islandbee Huawei has overtaken Apple to become world's 2nd largest smartphone manufacturer in 2018, only behind Samsung at number one. So how exactly are Chinese products cheap knockoffs, when we have clearly surpassed the original? Huawei phones have seen more sales than even Apple phones, so it's a clear indication of our increasing quality. Source: Huawei overtakes Apple as world No. 2 smartphone seller, gains ground in China reuters.com/article/us-huawei-revenue-idUSKBN1KL0BN Other Chinese smartphone companies like Oppo, Xiaomi, Lenovo and ZTE have consistently ranked among the world's top 10 smartphone brands, so its clear that Huawei is not the only improving company in China and others are catching up as well. Source: Top 10 smartphone companies gadgetsnow.com/slideshows/worlds-10-biggest-smartphone-companies/photolist/59889191.cms
    1
  22046.  @yelenaangeleski3354  Anti-China sentiment in Australia is fueled by the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West).
    1
  22047.  @intothewrx  In the past, Hong Kong was once a prosperous port city under authoritarian British colonial rule, while the mainland was still dirt-poor at that time. However, fortunes have reversed today and Hong Kong has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan and is facing increasing levels of competition from other upcoming mainland port cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian. Source: Wikipedia: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports Source: Wikipedia: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage#2012%E2%80%932017 No wonder why the people of Hong Kong feel like they are being left behind as mainland cities start surpassing Hong Kong.
    1
  22048. I've noticed this too. Perhaps you could try posting an innocuous comment, see if that passes the censorship, and then reply to yourself on that same post.
    1
  22049. Taiwan wasn't even listed as a destination on Pelosi's itenerary, so she had to sneak into the island in the middle of the night.
    1
  22050. It is USA that wants keep North Korea isolated by imposing sanctions on North Korea and preventing catch up material with the West, yet you blame Chinese government for trading with N. Korea?
    1
  22051. She has proposed a dialogue session with the protestors, but the protestors refuse to meet with Carrie Lam, then how do you expect her to solve the problem? The protestors are choosing violence over dialogue.
    1
  22052. I feel bad for the other 5 Eyes countries Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand, for just blindly hopping onboard the boycott wagon after the Biden Administration announced it was diplomatically boycotting the 2022 Beijing Olympics. The USA is literally taking the other 5 Eyes countries for a ride, and is now U.S has hopped off the boycott wagon. It just shows the U.S doesn't care about it's allies, it leads them into trouble time and time again.
    1
  22053.  @Andy-P  Did you hear about how Ukraine had dammed the North Crimean Canal since 8 years ago, cutting off precious water supplies to Crimea after they had a referendum in 2014 to join Russia?
    1
  22054.  @Andy-P  So why is India (a Western democratic country) often overlooked by the world, for wanting to continue doing business with Russia? Yet the world's eyes are focused on China when both India and China abstained from the UN vote? It's amazing how the world switches attention from bashing China, to bashing Russia so easily, without even bothering to find out information from the other side. We listen with both ears right? Yet why are many people seemingly content to just listen with one ear? You said: "If China wants a military victory then strike South." As far as I know, there hasn't been any PLA troops buildup in the Taiwan Strait, unlike the earlier buildup of Russian troops, so there's no evidence to suggest an impending attack on Taiwan. Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out is due to perceived U.S support. But the events in Ukraine have revealed that for all the U.S talk, the Americans are very opposed to putting American troops lives at risk in another war, since Biden's botched Afghan withdrawal, so Taiwan should realize by now that they can't expect U.S military troop support if conflict breaks out in the Taiwan Strait.
    1
  22055.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou EU banning Russian propaganda - horrahhh. I saw a Chinese TV youtube report on Ukraine. I thought it was good" This again leads back to my previous point about why is many people don't want to listen with both ears? Why don't people want to learn the other side of the story? I mean, you never know, you found this Chinese TV Youtube report on Ukraine, and found it good, yet why are you celebrating RT being banned in EU?
    1
  22056.  @Andy-P  Well, Russia blew up the dam that Ukraine built over the North Crimean Canal, allowing fresh water to flow to Crimea for the first time in 8 years. And if you support the idea that Ukraine can choose not to recognize the referendum in Crimea, would that mean you support Beijing in the hypothetical scenario that if Taiwan suddenly calls a referendum for independence, that Beijing would not recognize such a referendum as well? Of course, it's just a hypothetical scenario.
    1
  22057.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou Ask the Indians why?" I think you misread my question. Earlier you said (and I quote your words): "The world see's CCP not condemning this." but India also abstained from condemning the conflict in Ukraine, so my question is why doesn't the world see India in the same light as China not condemning this? I wasn't asking about why India continues trading with Russia.
    1
  22058.  @Andy-P  India is a superpower in the making, but who says they aren't looking for world leadership? India has been wanting more global recognition on the stage (just listen to Indians and watch their media) and India certainly does want to play a greater world in global affairs, just like China. Yet India's abstaining from voting is largely being overlooked compared to China's?
    1
  22059.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou Okay I'll modify my statement. Recent Russian news is pure propaganda. Apparently until yesterday there was no mention of the fighting outside the Donbass." How often do you watch Russian news? They've been talking about Donbass shelling for 8 years, yet why'd you claim they're reporting non-existent shelling? Also, I've noticed that you dodged my question about "Have you also considered the opinion that perhaps the Western MSM like CNN, BBC, etc are biased towards Russia and China as well?" It's like you consider Russian and Chinese news biased, but seemingly not Western MSM, even though there's alot of fake news running on Western MSM. For example, there's this footage of a missile slamming into an apartment in Kyiv and leaving a massive hole in the apartment (but thankfully the apartment remains standing). It turns out that it was not a Russian missile, it was an Ukrainian missile that apparently malfunctioned and hit one of their own buildings. A failure in the missile guidance system of the Ukrainian Buk-M1 medium-range air defense system and the missile hit the corner of a residential building. The Ukrainian anti-aircraft missile malfunction was due to a lack of maintenance of the military equipment, which has been in service since Soviet times. Although Ukraine could have done more by giving away those territories, right now it seems that the best course of action to stop the conflict is for Zelensky to surrender. Zelensky is unnecessarily prolonging the fight by refusing to surrender, and by forcefully conscripting men to fight in the Ukrainian army, in order to increase the death toll. By giving away rifles and rocket launchers to the civilian populace, they want to increase the number of civilian casualties as much as possible. Zelensky also recently removed the age limit on conscription, so now he's literally enlisting child soldiers to sacrifice themselves just because Zelensky refuse to surrender Ukraine.
    1
  22060.  @Andy-P  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Not be me it isn't" You're saying India isn't a superpower in the making? Meaning to say you'll never see India as a superpower in the future? The Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR) from UK has predicted that Indian economy will become the world's third largest by the year 2031, how's that not a superpower in the making?
    1
  22061.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou Surrender? That is what the invaders want." Do you see any way out for Ukraine? It's apparent by now that NATO and USA aren't going to send actual troops to defend Ukraine. If somehow Ukraine's entry into NATO succeeds, that means NATO countries would be forced to defend Ukraine, so I can see no way NATO is going to approve Ukraine's entry, especially during the current conflict. Ukraine has been effectively abandoned by the West (even Zelensky mentioned so), so the best course of action would be for Zelensky to surrender. You said: "The conscription limit is 18 - same as Russia." They just changed it just 7 days ago. According to NBC News article: Age restriction removed for joining Ukrainian military it says that Ukraine has removed age restrictions and simplified its procedures for citizens to join the military, the country’s Minister of Defense Alexey Reznikov said. So the removal of age restrictions means that child soldiers under the age of 18 can be enlisted to sacrifice themselves, just for Zelensky's refusal to surrender. By arming civilians with rifles and rocket launchers, Zelensky is attempting to maximise civilian casualties. You said: "I thought more of you Shenzhou to blame the deaths of Ukranian children on the ukranians themselves." So who killed those 14,000 civilians in the Donetsk and Luhansk if not Ukrainians themselves? Were they all struck by lightning and died? Was it an earthquake or some other natural disasters? No, it was by the Ukrainian ultra-nationalist, neo Nazis such as the Azov battalion. Russia is not starting a war, they are effectively putting an end to the Ukrainian civil war that started over 8 years ago. You said: "I see you are propagating other Russian lies to." Why suddenly all the personal attacks against me for my views? And I noticed while that you consider Russian and Chinese media propaganda, yet you don't question Western MSM coverage of the Ukraine crisis? That missile that hit an apartment building in Kyiv couldn't be a Russian cruise missile, because a Russian cruise missile would have leveled the whole apartment, instead of just leaving a gaping hole in the building. You said: "Putin & CCP a marriage made in hell." India abstained from condemning the military intervention in Ukraine either, yet many in the world overlook this. It's seemingly the combination of Red Scare (fear of communism) and the the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling the anti-Russian and anti-China sentiment in the West today.
    1
  22062. Agreed. If a government is truly against the people, it's up to the people themselves to rise up, revolt and overthrow their government, rather than having foreign powers sponsor the opposition, which takes away the validity of the legitimacy.
    1
  22063. When US and China cooperate, the whole world wins. If they don't cooperate, then the world suffers.
    1
  22064.  @erniecorella7676  "But do wake up it's time for China 🇨🇳 to change for the better and let 🇹🇼 Taiwan go." Why should mainland China be forced to forgo our territory of Taiwan, just because foreigners like you say so? Taiwan is an inseparable part of China. Even Taiwan's own constitution says so, and since there hasn't been any amendments to its constitution, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  22065.  @cchc245  You said: "The biggest company in Taiwan (and china) Taiwan semiconductor, pays zero taxes to Chinese government.. and Chinese have zero control over taiwanese companies. Tell me again how China owns Taiwan right now." China is unique in that different autonomous regions of China have different laws. For example, companies from Hong Kong SAR don't have to pay taxes to the Central People's Government (i.e Beijing), but it doesn't change the fact that Hong Kong is part of China under the One Country, Two Systems policy. Likewise, companies from Taiwan don't have to pay taxes to Beijing, but it doesn't change the fact that Taiwan is part of China under the One China policy. "Taiwan already helped build china with their economy." Correct, but likewise, mainland China today is helping build Taiwan's economy, so much such that mainland China is Taiwan's biggest trading partner. You said: "I thought YouTube is banned in China." What makes you think that? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    1
  22066.  @cchc245  "神州 Shenzhou apparently you don't live in China. Youtube, facebook, are banned. Winnie the Pooh is banned." Who said Winnie the Pooh is banned in China? There's a Winnie the Pooh Ride in Shanghai Disneyland, called The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh, (小熊维尼历险记) yet you claim Winnie the Pooh is banned in China? Also, which person has been arrested just for logging into YouTube/Facebook while in China, if you claim YouTube and Facebook is banned in China? You said: "The sad part about this debate is, I am OK for you to have your opinion, but for China under Xi, it means war when 23 million Taiwanese disagrees." Look at Taiwanese TV host, Huang Chih-Hsien (黃智賢) who had her TV license revoked after she expressed pro-reunification views, and what makes you think such opinions are tolerated in Taiwan?
    1
  22067.  @cchc245  Who said Winnie the Pooh is banned in China? There's a Winnie the Pooh Ride in Shanghai Disneyland, called The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh, (小熊维尼历险记) yet you claim Winnie the Pooh is banned in China? Also, which person has been arrested just for logging into YouTube while in China, if you claim YouTube is banned in China? You said: "The sad part about this debate is, I am OK for you to have your opinion, but for China under Xi, it means war when 23 million Taiwanese disagrees." Look at Taiwanese TV host, Huang Chih-Hsien (黃智賢) who had her TV license revoked after she expressed pro-reunification views, and what makes you think such opinions are tolerated in Taiwan?
    1
  22068. During Korean War, it was South Korea, United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Greece, France + 10 other countries, all versus China and North Korea. Our PLA troops were untrained, our equipment were crappy, our supply lines over extended, our air and naval support non-existent and we only had North Korea troops for allies. Whereas USA and its allies had better training, better equipment, better air and naval support, and Japan providing logistical support. And yet, those 16 countries still did not win against China and North Korea?
    1
  22069.  @miracleman8022  China literally reported the emergence of a mysterious pnemonia-like illness on 31st Dec 2019 to the World Health Organization, so how did China lied?
    1
  22070.  @miracleman8022  How did China lied about COVID? Didn't China inform the World Health Organization of a mysterious novel coronavirus on 31st Dec 2019?
    1
  22071.  @lyhthegreat  "神州 Shenzhou china did tried to cover up the existence of the virus...the doc who sounded out got silenced by the ccp" If you're referring to Dr Li Wenliang, his WeChat Message was dated to 30th Dec 2019, just 1 day before China reported the novel coronavirus to the WHO on 31st Dec 2019, so how is that covering up the existence of the virus?
    1
  22072.  @lyhthegreat  If you're referring to Dr Li Wenliang, his WeChat Message was dated to 30th Dec 2019, just 1 day before China reported the novel coronavirus to the WHO on 31st Dec 2019, so how is that covering up the existence of the virus?
    1
  22073.  @lyhthegreat  Covid has an incubation period of at least 2 weeks, so even if the first case was reported on the first of December, it just means that the person may have contracted it earlier. Also, I've read through your paragraph and nowhere does it show how China covered up the virus, China had reported it at the end of December after all. Also, like you said, there was no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission, it was only on 21st January that China confirmed human-to-human transmission, and Wuhan was locked down shortly after. So wheres your evidence that China covered it up?
    1
  22074. ​ @lyhthegreat  But the doctor's post was just one day before China reported it to the WHO, then how is China covering it up?
    1
  22075. After the USSR's dissolution, NATO no longer serves any interests. Except that of the US's.
    1
  22076.  @jayztv3345  Philippines boundaries are drawn up in the 1898 Treaty of Paris and they DID NOT include the South China Sea Islands. (Source: Wikipedia: File: Ph boundary in Treaty of Paris 1898)
    1
  22077.  @paradoxine6287  If you don't want Wikipedia, you can look up an article The Treaty Limits of the Philippines (by ResearchGate) and Philippines maritime boundary is clearly marked out in the Treaty of Paris, in which the South China Sea is not included within Philippine territory.
    1
  22078.  @toppy_ctp  In 1999, Philippine president Joseph Estrada promised that the ground vessel would be towed away. In 2014, the Chinese government asked the Philippines to remove the grounded ship. In 2017, China and the Philippines established a gentlemen's agreement that the status quo be maintained for the South China Sea, as both sides tried to strengthen their relations. Under the status quo agreement, no construction materials are allowed to fortify the Sierra Madre. Yet the Philippines has gone against this agreement and repeatedly brought in supply ships to reinforce the rusting hull of the grounded vessel.
    1
  22079.  @paradoxine6287  Look up an article entitled: The Treaty Limits of the Philippines if you don't want Wikipedia. They show the same thing that Philippine's maritime boundary does not include the South China Sea.
    1
  22080.  @lydiawhite8320  "You only occupied and build an Island in West Phil. Sea when the American base left Philippines. China even said before its ony for fishing docking ? What its now? China Military base. Do your research?" What's the name of this island? Sabina Shoal? They've only found pieces of dead corals, how's this evidence of a "China Military Base?"
    1
  22081. "Or maybe he just doesn't like China. At all..." It's quite possibly this very reason. People fear what they do not understand, especially an Asian country with a political system different from that of the West, which according to their calculations should be failing, yet continues to grow and prosper instead.
    1
  22082. +Mickey G If Westerner only contribute to majority of scientific advancement after 1400, then Asia contributed significantly to scientific advancement from before 1400 isn't that right? Ancient Chinese people invented the crossbow, which spread to Europe and enabled even untrained peasants to fight on equal footing with trained archers during medieval times. The stirrups that enable medieval knights to fight on horseback, originated in China from horse riding nomads in the North. Besides gunpowder, Chinese people also the first to invent handguns, bombs, handgrenades, landmines, naval mines, exploding cannonballs, rockets launchers and of course, fireworks. There is even an ancient Chinese flamethrower housed in Chinese museum, capable of shooting continuous stream of fire just like modern flamethrower. But Western historical textbooks like to credit themselves with invention of these technology. Rocket was Chinese invention, but Americans claimed it was "white person" Robert Goddard that invented the rocket. Many Asian nations including India and China first made recordings of astronomy, but Western textbook would mention only people like Plato or Aristotle. It is this "white washing" that makes it appear like Westerners are scientifically superior, when much of their knowledge of science, mathematics, astronomy is actually gleamed from Asia. Are you saying Native Americans did not consider themselves "nations", therefore they are deprived of the rights to their lands? Europeans were foreign invaders, not of the same continent as America, whereas Chinese civilization accreted from the various indigenous nation states living in Asia along the Yellow river. Our Chinese ancestors lived and walked on these very lands for thousands of years, whereas you can't say the same thing of European colonists in America. Only Native Americans could say their ancestors lived there for millennia.
    1
  22083. +Mickey G There are many more Chinese inventions I could name. Chinese people invented paper and printing to help preserve and transfer knowledge, which books such as Holy Bible are made from, and helped raised Europe out of Dark Ages. Chinese also invented the banknote, which helped speed up business transactions worldwide by reducing the carrying of metal coinage. In metallurgy, ancient Chinese people invent the blast furnace and cupola furnace, which made use of bellows to achieve the high temperatures necessary to smelt iron ore to create pig, wrought iron, cast iron, as well as steel, being the first nation to use coke as fuel. Using iron drill heads, Chinese people were also the first to drill wells and even mine for natural gas and salt, using bamboo derricks and bamboo pipes to siphon the gas to be use as lantern fuel. About your father and son arithmetic analogy, it goes without saying that the son would not have progressed this far if it weren't for the father teaching him. This is why Chinese people tend to respect elders for their seniority and our ancestors who lived on the land before us. Without their efforts, China would not be where it is today. China has 5000 years of history and is one of world's oldest "continuous" civilizations still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Rome and Egypt have long since faded to history. Even today, China has accomplished much from science, quantum mechanics and so on. China is home to world's fastest supercomputer, Sunway Taihu Light 神威·太湖之光 and in quantum computing, China is the first nation to launch world's first quantum satellite that is said to be hack-proof due to its quantum encryption, and also demonstrated that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere. Quantum satellite achieves 'spooky action' at record distance youtube.com/watch?v=4QlcKuxDGrs
    1
  22084. +Mickey G What is Chinese imperialism compared to Western imperialism? Which country is the one founding colonies in Africa, India and especially the Americas and Australia? China once had the opportunity to create colonies of our own, when our naval power was supreme, such as during Ming dynasty, when Zheng He led seven voyages, visiting Africa, India and the Middle East, with armada of ships, some of which were 4 to 5 times the size of Santa Maria (Columbus' ship) But it was a merchant armada for peaceful trading purposes, and not geared towards expansionism and colonization, unlike the European colonial powers at that time. CrashCourse History on Zheng He's voyages https://youtu.be/NjEGncridoQ?t=126 If you differentiate between quantum computing and quantum satellite, then China also built our own quantum computer prototype that is 24,000 times faster than its international counterparts. China Developing World’s First Quantum Computer chinamoneynetwork.com/2017/04/12/china-developing-worlds-first-quantum-computer China hits milestone in developing quantum computer scmp.com/news/china/policies-politics/article/2092635/china-hits-milestone-developing-quantum-computer If you really are Asian, then you should know that Westerners have often mocked our self-esteem and ridiculed our culture as backward as compared to theirs. But Asian history is much longer and richer than that of Caucasians. Studies have also shown that Asians are among the world's most intelligent and diligent people of culture, so why should we Asians somehow consider ourselves inferior to "White men"? This preconception that Asians are inferior, exists solely within our minds, that's all, and is restricting us from realizing our full potential. We need to shrug off this misconception imposed onto us by Westerners, and to start seeing ourselves on an equal footing as them. Like you said, we need not grow to become overly arrogant. But we should definitely not sell ourselves short of what we are capable of.
    1
  22085. +Mickey G You keep claiming that I keep on missing your point... then exactly what point are you trying to make here?? The son would be unable to learn differential equation, if his father didn't teach him arithmetic first isn't it? You claim that the younger generation Chinese losing their values, but then again, the son is his own person, different from his father, isn't it? Do you think the son would be able discover differential equation, if he only stuck to his father's arithmetic all the time? In the same way, younger generation of Chinese are paving the way for China's future, in their own way. Why is it you appear to look down China's accomplishments and claim that they are falsifiable? Besides supercomputing and quantum computing, China is 3rd country in world to independently send people into space, besides USA and Russia. In 2008, China conducted our first "spacewalk" during Shenzhou-7 mission and we even landed our very own lunar rover and spacecraft Chang'e-3 on the Moon in 2013, after almost 40 years of neglecting the Moon by NASA. The government also hopes to one day, put a man on the Moon like USA and to also be the first country to land on dark side of the Moon. China Shenzhou 7 Space Walk Live!! Full Success! youtube.com/watch?v=gMxQEHfU6hM You portray China as being imperialistic and expansionist, but currently, China is peaceful and not been involved in any war for 30 years, since our last major battle in 1979. In contrast, the USA is still involved in war and bombing countries in Middle East, even in 21st century. China has territorial disputes with some of our neighbors, but so far, it is bloodless without war being declared. The Chinese government has repeatedly stressed that bilateral dialogue is China's approach to solving these problems. If Asians continue to worship the "white" man on his pedestal, then Asians will forever be shackled under them. Who's going to believe in Asian's success, if we ourselves don't even believe in ourselves? How are we ever going to realize our full potential, if we continue to follow Westerners all the time? It is not set in stone that Westerners are always superior to other races. The world order can always topple and change one day in future, as long as Asian people work towards it. If Asians continue do nothing, then obviously, nothing will change. In the end, Westerners will continue walk all over us.
    1
  22086.  @jp95js  It's true that Xi Jinping came from humble origins, that's why he knows what's poverty in rural China is like (he lived through it) and he vowed to eliminate poverty in China eventually. Even today, President Xi visits parts of rural China under the poverty alleviation program. Video: President Xi inspects poverty alleviation achievements in SW China youtu.be/-d5CriKhRVA But do you think Donald Trump or Joe Biden even care about poverty in America or knows what they it's like?
    1
  22087.  @jp95js  China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/j3J196bLP5E
    1
  22088.  @jp95js  The name of the party is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where Zhōngguó (中国) means China and Gòngchǎndǎng (共产党) means Communist Party so the proper name should be the Communist Party of China (CPC), not the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). I mean, do you call it the United States of America (USA) or the made-up name "American United States" (AUS)? It's the same with CPC and CCP.
    1
  22089.  @repardation7409  "But 中国共产党 has "china" first not in the middle. So it is china, communist, party." But China Communist Party (CCP) doesn't make sense in English, the term is grammatically correct as Communist Party of China (CPC) just as you've proven my point with the other communist/socialist party naming convention.
    1
  22090.  @repardation7409  While there are multiple ways to define democracy, one common definition is a government of the people, by the people, for the people. In this definition, the United States is certainly not a democracy, because the US Government is of the 1%, by the 1% and for the 1%. The US appears to be a plutocracy, not a democracy, if the 1% rich Americans and corporations control everything from government policies to deciding which countries to wage war upon. Whereas China is possibly more democratic than the United States, because the Chinese government is of the people, by the people and for the people. A long-term Harvard University and Ash Center study has revealed that around 80-90% of the Chinese citizens support the Chinese government. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. So in sense, the U.S isn't a democracy because the U.S government just isn't delivering what the people want, whereas in China's case, China is democratic because the Chinese government is delivering what the people want.
    1
  22091.  @repardation7409  Rule of Law? Look at the United States drone strike in Kabul, killing 10 Afghan civilians (including women and children) and the Pentagon investigated the incident and found that the U.S General responsible for ordering the attack did not violate any law. That's American "rule of law" and exceptionalism for you, where they can just kill another country's inhabitants with impunity. And the survey was conducted by reputable organizations like Harvard University and Ash Center. And I mean just think of it, if there was really huge consequences if citizens don't support the government, then the survey should yield 100% support instead of just 80-90%, isn't it? As for the Mandate of Heaven (天命) what it basically means in China is that a leader that has displayed competence would be allowed to remain in power, and that an incompetent leader would be overthrown by revolution. Since President Xi has shown to be a strong and competent leader, able to govern a country of 1.4 billion people (certainly no easy feat) then can't he be allowed to remain in power in order to maximize the benefits to China? Because such quality leadership material is hard to find, just look at the quality of leaders that Western democracies have produced with their policies, like Donald Trump's MAGA, Joe Biden Botched Afghan withdrawal, Boris Johnson's "Partygate" and Scott Morrison's AUKUS alliance betraying France. It's apparent that Western democratic institutions just aren't delivering what the people want, whereas China's government is able to deliver what the Chinese want.
    1
  22092. China has world's largest population so its possible that not enough resources, not enough schools and not enough jobs for everyone here in China. With such high student population, competition for top schools and higher education in China is extremely fierce and intense. Some local students unable to qualify for local university here, so they study abroad in Western universities. Some graduates here also unable to find work, so they seek job opportunities outside of China.
    1
  22093.  @michaelkatz275  The America's botched withdrawal from Afghanistan has shaken confidence in its U.S allies support for its warmongering. After nearly 20 years and pouring trillions of dollars into Afghanistan, with many U.S soldiers lost (including those of its allies) just to replace the Taliban government with the Taliban government, the U.S allies are only going to get more cautious about blindly following the U.S into another war (i.e going to war with mainland China over Taiwan) The Fall of Kabul is also reminiscence of the Fall of Saigon, and it just shows that USA has a history of intervening and then pulling out later, abandoning their allies left behind. The people of Taiwan would do well to from learn this, that if the U.S might just pull out their support from Taiwan anytime they want, and without warning.
    1
  22094.  @michaelkatz275  How is he threatening war? Since here is no PLA troop buildup in the Taiwan Strait (unlike the Russian troop buildup at it's border with Ukraine) that means there's no evidence of an impending attack on Taiwan by the mainland.
    1
  22095.  @michaelkatz275  If you want to talk about police oppression, just look at African Americans getting shot/killed by police officers such as George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks and so on, sparking off Black Lives Matter protests across the USA. And if you want to talk about mass incarceration, then it's actually America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons.
    1
  22096.  @michaelkatz275  Where did you get your exaggerated death toll figure of 60 million people during the Great Leap Forward (1958 - 1962)? I checked China's population in 1955 was 612,241,552 and by 1960, China's population actually increased to 660,408,054, having grown by 48,166,502, according a source called Population Pyramid: China China's population from 1950-1975 1950: 554,419,268 1955: 612,241,552 } Great Leap Forward 1960: 660,408,054 } Great Leap Forward 1965: 724,218,970 1970: 827,601,385 1975: 926,240,888 ... Source: Population Pyramid: China So you're saying that during the Great Leap Forward (1958-1960), China's population decreased by 60 million, yet from 1955-1960, China's population actually increased by a further 48 million? Where did you get your bloated death toll figures from?
    1
  22097.  @michaelkatz275  "神州 Shenzhou Look at it this way. The United States saves 30 billion dollar a year by not being in Afghanistan." Money saved which could have been put to better use funding domestic issues in America, such as healthcare and education, yet you're claiming Americans are happy with the decisions to interfere in another country's internal affairs, instead of focusing on the home?
    1
  22098.  @michaelkatz275  Again, since there is no PLA troop buildup in the Taiwan Strait (unlike the Russian troop buildup) then there's no evidence to suggest any impending attack on Taiwan by the mainland isn't it? President Xi Jinping has publicly vowed for peaceful reunification of Taiwan with the mainland.
    1
  22099.  @michaelkatz275  "No one over here believes that lockdowns work anymore." Because your people don't adhere to the lockdown, instead many go out and protest the lockdown or even the vaccine (just look at the Canadian truckers protest) those are super spreader events. Because you treasure "freedumbs" over treasuring lives, unlikely what China is doing. That's why China can control Covid-19 situation and limit the number of Covid-19 cases in China to a minimum. Whereas the United States for example, represents just 4% of the world's population, but is home to 25% of the world's Covid-19 cases and deaths.
    1
  22100.  @michaelkatz275  I'm still waiting for you to explain where you get your exaggerated death toll of 60 million during the Great Leap Forward. I mean, China's population at that time was around, 600 million so you're saying that China lost 10% of our population during the Great Leap Forward (1958-1962) when it turns out that overall, from 1955-1960, China's population actually grew by 40 million?
    1
  22101.  @sportsonwheelss  Agreed. Before President Nixon's visit to China, the USA did not recognise the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 diplomatically and economically, they recognised Republic of China 🇹🇼 in Taiwan, that's why Chairman Mao was unable to import food from countries like Australia, because of U.S embargoes. The same goes for when Trump slapped sanctions on Venezuela and caused food prices to skyrocket.
    1
  22102.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "神州 Shenzhou many countries have been better since 1989, including North Korea. Doesn't mean they chose the right path." Yeah, and some countries have gotten worst since Trump's 2016 election. This is exactly the type of "colonial mentality" that plagues many former colonies, including Hong Kong. Hong Kong was a British colony for over 150 years, during which the British drilled into the people's minds, that Western-style democracy is the "right path", to the exclusion of all alternative forms of government. Even after Britain physically decolonized from Hong Kong, the "decolonization of the mind" still needs to happen, to recognize the colonialist ideas pervading the people's thoughts.
    1
  22103.  @MarkYeung1  The Communist Party of China has actually acknowledged that Chairman Mao did more good for China than bad. Even in 1981, Deng Xiaoping acknowledged that Mao's contributions to the Chinese revolution far outweigh his mistakes, that his merits are primary and his errors secondary. According to Deng Xiaoping, Mao Zedong rendered indelible meritorious service in founding and building up the communist party and the Chinese liberation of the oppressed nations of the world and to the progress of mankind.
    1
  22104. ​ @MarkYeung1  The name of the party in Chinese is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where Zhōngguó (中国) means China, and Gòngchǎndǎng (共产党) means Communist Party. Therefore, the correct name of the party should be the Communist Party of China (CPC), not the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Because the party name contains Zhōngguó (中国) China within it.
    1
  22105.  @sportsonwheelss  Agreed with what you said to @mark yeung. Some overseas Hong Kongers (but not all) are still suffering from the subservient "colonial mentality" and they need to learn to recognize the colonizer's ideas pervading their thoughts, giving them a disdain for anything that's non-white as "wrong" and to worship white Anglo-Saxon culture as "correct."
    1
  22106.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou So Mao did do harm in China according to Deng." That's incorrect. Please read my Deng Xiaoping's words carefully when he said that Mao did more good than harm. At a convention on party history in 1981, the reformist leadership under Deng Xiaoping declared that Mao’s contributions to the Chinese revolution far outweigh his mistakes and that his merits are primary and his errors secondary. He rendered indelible meritorious service in founding and building up our party and the Chinese liberation of the oppressed nations of the world and to the progress of mankind. Source: 1981 New York Times article: Excerpts From Resolution on History of Mao's Contributions and Mistakes.
    1
  22107.  @MarkYeung1  Because the Ukrainian government in Kiev is behind the attacks in Donbas. Just for comparison, when Germany attacked Poland at the start of WWII, the Allies eventually took the fighting to Germany, instead of just limiting the fight to just Poland alone.
    1
  22108.  @aerojetrocketdyners-2538  But we are talking about statistically more civilian deaths (81.4% according to the UN) in rebel-held areas in Donbas. Putin has tried the peaceful approach through the Minsk Agreements, which were meant to stop the fighting, include a ceasefire, facilitate withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, and institute constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas. But the Minsk Agreements wasn't adhered too. After realizing that for years, his words have fallen on deaf ears in the West, Putin finally decided to act. Russia is putting an end to a war that began 8 years ago.
    1
  22109.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "All countries agree that Donbas is part of Ukraine. In other words, it's an internal matter." Back in 2014, even Russia agreed that Donetsk and Luhansk is part of Ukraine. But 8 years of civil strife have taken their toll and according to UN figures, from 2018 to 2021, 81.4% of civilian casualties in the Donbas war came in rebel-held territory, so Russia is finally putting an end to this conflict and recognizing the two republics. At the start of WWII, Germany had attacked Poland, yet why did the Allies attack Germany instead of limiting the fighting to Poland? The same thing goes with Kiev. In order to end the civil conflict, Russia needed to take the fighting to Kiev, because that is where the Ukrainian government is. And I never mentioned anything about me justifying Japanese invasion of China, nor about China surrendering, why do you constantly accuse me of such words? Even in Ukraine, a huge portion of the Azov Battalion has surrendered in the Azovstal Steel Plant in Maripol, and other Ukrainian cities like Kharkov, Lyman, etc, are surrendering to Russians, and raising the Soviet Union flag, as well as trading in Russian ruble.
    1
  22110. China seeks win-win cooperation, whereas the US sees everything as a zero sum game.
    1
  22111. At 5:10 I think the Chinese man is confusing you as being from Vladivostok (Russian: Владивосто́к) which was formerly part of Chinese dynasties under various names like Yǒngmíngchéng (永明城) or Hǎishēnwǎi (海參崴).
    1
  22112. South Koreans even protested against US deployment of THAAD. Source:South Koreans Protest US Missile Installation http://time.com/4755310/south-korea-protest-thaad-missile/
    1
  22113.  @armathanya8000  Many Filipinos (but not all) tend to have the Colonial Mentality, worshiping Anglo-Saxon culture while harboring disdain for any non-white culture (including their own). Their minds need to be decolonized, only then will they emancipate from these mental chains.
    1
  22114.  @armathanya8000  They cling to the Colonial Mentality of worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture while harboring disdain for any non-white culture (including their own). Just as former colonies undergo decolonization, the minds of the people need to be decolonized as well.
    1
  22115.  @napalmblaziken  If you want to experience real Asian culture then you should visit China, the birthplace of East Asian civilization.
    1
  22116.  @bctvanw  You said: "Something not mentioned here is that... Taiwan is in the front line of protecting USA's pacific territories" What's the United States in the other side of the globe, even doing in Pacific? Taiwan island is directly in front of mainland China's doorstep, it's apparent that the Americans don't really care about Taiwan, they only want to use the island to contain the mainland's rise and further US interests in the Pacific.
    1
  22117.  @napalmblaziken  What's the issue with the Chinese government? Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  22118.  @napalmblaziken  Did you know that the 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and a traitor to his people? The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government (Beijing). Declassified CIA files have exposed that a total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) ... Source: CIA Tibetan program (Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Costs ) So here we have concrete evidence that the 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the USA to engage in separatist activities against the Central People's Government.
    1
  22119.  @napalmblaziken  The 14th Dalai Lama sold out to the CIA, accepting American money to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against Beijing, you expect China to accept a hostile foreign government funding separatists in our country? And with regards to the "true successor" what if the 14th Dalai Lama choose another CIA agent to become the next successor? Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    1
  22120.  @napalmblaziken  You said: "Does that excuse stamping on Tibetan culture? No. It doesn't." How is Tibetan culture being stamped on? Under the previous Dalai Lama rule, majority of the Tibetan people were illiterate and the only way to receive an education is was to become a monk. But under communist party rule, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages List of universities and colleges in Tibet -Tibet University (西藏大学, Lhasa and Nyingchi) -Tibet Minzu University (西藏民族学院, located in Xianyang, Shaanxi but under supervision of the Tibetan provincial government) -Tibet University of Traditional Tibetan Medicine (西藏藏医学院, Lhasa) -Tibet Vocational Technical College (西藏职业技术学院, Lhasa) -Tibet Police Officers Institute (西藏警官高等专科学校, Lhasa)
    1
  22121.  @napalmblaziken  "神州 Shenzhou The Dalai-Lama didn't train them. The CIA took the opportunity to train up resistance fighters for the Tibetan government in exile." The 14th Dalai Lama accepted foreign money, and here we have explicit evidence of the American CIA funding separatist activities in China, then why should the central government tolerate a hostile foreign power funding separatism in our country? "Why should Tibetans allow a foreign power to rule over them and demand their obedience?" Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, back when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territories into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during the Qing Dynasty. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Tibet broke free of China in 1912 but no one recognized Tibetan independence and Tibet was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951. "Also, the true successor to the Dalai-Lama isn't a CIA puppet." How can you prove that? The CIA need only instruct the Dalai Lama to choose another puppet, then why should China allow our internal politics in Tibet to be dictated by the CIA? "But China does? The one China calls the successor is a puppet for their authoritarian regime." Why not? Tibet is clearly part of China today as recognized by the rest of the world, then why can't China choose the successor for the Dalai Lama, since it will impact China's internal affairs? Why should China let the CIA choose another puppet given that the Dalai Lama was one himself?
    1
  22122.  @napalmblaziken  Here's a List of universities and colleges in Tibet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet They were all built after Tibet returned to communist party rule.
    1
  22123.  @napalmblaziken  "神州 Shenzhou Now I will give the Chinesr government this. As much as I detest the Chinese authoritarian regime, I do in a way, admire Xi Jinping." China's current political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then is there a need to abandon our political system and adopt the Western brand of democracy? China's political system has produced a leader like President Xi Jinping, who's shown to be competent and politically experienced (with around 30-40 years of political experience) then shouldn't such a system that produces effective leadership be allowed to continue? Whereas you look at the American political system and they produced leaders with literally no political experience like Trump before he took office, then is such a political system really that good? Why can't China continue with our political system and the U.S continue with theirs?
    1
  22124.  @bctvanw  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwan is in the middle of Japan, USA, China, the Philiphines, and Vietnam." You mentioned USA, how is Taiwan even located close to the United States mainland at all? And the Diaoyu Islands are actually closer to mainland China than Japan, yet Japan can claim the Diaoyu Islands? Here's a map for comparison (Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Senkaku_Diaoyu_Tiaoyu_Islands.png ) You said: "Taiwan=China's door steps? If China gets Taiwan, what next? It's not hard to imagine." Taiwan is historically part of China, even Taiwan's own constitution says that Taiwan is part of China, then can't mainland China claim the island? Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  22125. Tennis is obviously a sport, but WTA is trying to mix sports with politics. Peng Shuai has appeared on IOC video call, expressing a desire for her privacy to be respected. But the WTA is behaving like paparazzi and demanding that she appear in public to bare her private affairs for all the world to see.
    1
  22126.  @boingenchomp  Peng Shuai has wrote an email to WTA explaining that the allegations of sexual assault aren't true and she also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent. And what genocide of Uighurs are you talking about? The population of Uighurs in China has actually tripled in size from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953–2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 ...
    1
  22127.  @Cursed_Mark  "神州Shenzhou Tennis is obviously a sport" Wouldn't you agree then that people shouldn't mix sports with politics?
    1
  22128.  @Cursed_Mark  "Like when the authoritarian regime ruled by a dictator for life scrubbed the internet clean when one of their sports stars made serious allegations against one of their senior members?" Serious allegations of what against which senior member? Where's the allegations? "Yes, the CCP trying to bury this story was a mistake. They shouldn't have mixed sports with politics, it only made the situation seem more scandalous." The Communist Party of China has thus far, not made any comment on the issue. It was Peng Shuai that wrote an email to WTA explaining that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    1
  22129.  @Cursed_Mark  "I'm sorry your government has not allowed you to learn the details of this story." I have come across a translation of Peng Shuai's post on Reddit, let's use it for reference. I read her post and it's apparent that she has had a tumultuous, on-and-off previous relation with a much older man. But I didn't see any allegations of sexual assault made by Peng Shuai in her post, could you point me to the serious allegations? "Apart from the Global Times, which is owned by The People's Daily, the mouthpiece for the CCP. " But the Global Times is clearly not the Communist Party of China, so the CPC clearly hasn't made any comment about the issue. "BTW, I know you like to copy-and-paste because it saves you the trouble of coming up with a direct response, but it is unnecessary to copy-and-paste the entirety of someone's post." Alright then, then don't blame me for only selecting certain points of your text to respond to. This is what you asked for.
    1
  22130.  @Cursed_Mark  "神州 Shenzhou "This is what you asked for"" I'm saying, you asked for me not to copy and paste the entirety of someone's post. Given your lack of response to my earlier points, I assume you're unable to find Peng Shua's allegations of sexual assault? Then there is clearly no basis for the argument of sexual assault, yet the WTA is demanding she appear in public to bare her private affairs for the world to see.
    1
  22131.  @obriets  About electing leaders, why do you think democracy, that ordinary people participation in political decisions that will affect the country's future, to be a wise idea? Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (e.g they may not turn up to vote, or they submit blank votes) or they may base their decision on emotions not logic (e.g Many British don't like immigrants, so majority of them voted for Brexit) or they may be easily influenced by foreign powers (e.g Russian interference in US elections) or they may simply lack political awareness of their country's situation to make informed decisions regarding the country's future. Why not let those who know how to govern, govern? That's what China is doing and look at how successful mainland China is. We have a meritocracy in which people who can perform get promoted into higher government positions, not a democracy in which the most popular candidate gets to lead the country. President Trump doesn't even have any political experience at all, so why Americans voted for such a person to lead their country?
    1
  22132.  @prayfortheworld7960  Yes, the protests have been ongoing for 4 months already, almost as if some foreign anti-China power are secretly sponsoring the Hong Kong protests continuation from behind the scenes. I also noticed some HK protestors waving United States Flag 🇺🇲 and United Kingdom Flag 🇬🇧 among the crowds.
    1
  22133.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou So why mainlanders NOT ALLOWED TO WATCH the movie?" Who said that mainlanders aren't allowed to watch the Shang-Chi? It's just that Shang-Chi is yet to be released in mainland cinemas, however it doesn't mean that mainlanders aren't allowed to watch the movie.
    1
  22134.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou unfortunately Simu was right, Asians were underrepresented when he was growing up." How's that so? I've just listed several famous Chinese actors in Hollywood like Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Chow Yun Fatt, Donnie Yen, Tony Leung, and so on, yet you're claiming Asians are underrepresented? In 2018, Asians make up only 5.4% of the U.S population so what are you expecting Hollywood to be?
    1
  22135.  @Firebert79TA  China's supercomputer Tianhe-1 (天河-1) found that the lungs of a young American vaper hospitalized for "mysterious pneumonia" last summer could be exhibiting Covid-19 symptoms. scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3079046/chinese-supercomputer-and-american-doctors-clash-over-ai
    1
  22136.  @Firebert79TA  Dr Peter Forster, a geneticist Cambridge University has identified 3 Covid-19 strains (A, B, C) Type-A is believed to have leaped from bats to humans (animal-to-human transmission) and Type-B is mutated from Type-A and found predominantly in China while Type-C is mutated from Type-B and found predominantly outside China, in places like Singapore. Video: No proof that Covid-19 originated in Wuhan: Peter Forster youtu.be/AQQf2yoymu0 The interesting thing is that the Europe and America suffer predominantly from Type-A virus (animal-to-human transmission) and Type-A is predominantly found outside East Asia, in Europeans and Americans.
    1
  22137.  @matthewmorgan7106  Laowhy86 isn't even living in China anymore, he's left China but is still promoting hate against China.
    1
  22138.  @Firebert79TA  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  22139.  @Firebert79TA  US CDC tested blood samples of Americans collected back in Dec. 13 2019 and detected the presence of Covid-19 antibodies. This implies that Covid-19 was present in USA much earlier, to allow sufficient time for Americans to recover and to contain the antibodies in their blood. Source: COVID-19 may have been spreading in the US at least a month before first case was reported, CDC study says usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/12/01/covid-cdc-study-says-virus-us-weeks-before-first-case-reported/6475864002/ My question is why didn't USA sound the alarm of a mysterious pneumonia like illness back in December 2019 (or earlier)? Instead it was China that detected the unknown pneumonia like illness known as Covid-19 today? Because USA has arguably the best medical expertise and facilities available, compared to China, yet China was the one to discover Covid-19?
    1
  22140.  @Firebert79TA  So why didn't USA detect Covid-19 back in Dec 13 2019, when Covid-19 antibodies were already present in American blood samples? America has arguably the world's best medical experts, the best virologists, the best medical testing facilities, yet it was left up to China (with our inferior medical expertise) to detect Covid-19? Because of the trend? There was an unusually high number of flu cases in 2019, yet CDC didn't notice anything unusual. The CDC director Robert Redfield has publicly admitted that Covid-19 deaths have been misdiagnosed as flu so the outbreak could have been rampant in the USA even before Dec 2019. Robert Redfield, the director for the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) openly admitted that some COVID-19 deaths have been misdiagnosed as influenza in the U.S. Source: CDC director: Some COVID-19 deaths misdiagnosed as influenza in the U.S news.cgtn.com/news/2020-03-12/CDC-director-Some-COVID-19-deaths-misdiagnosed-as-influenza-in-U-S--ONz0SToSoE/index.html (The original statement by CDC director Robert Redfield has been seemingly removed from the Internet.) So because of USA misdiagnosed Covid-19 deaths as the flu, Covid-19 may have been present in USA earlier and earlier Covid-19 deaths were misdiagnosed as flu.
    1
  22141. Taiwan is an inseparable part of China....
    1
  22142. Taiwan is an inseparable part of China..
    1
  22143. Taiwan is an inseparable part of China..
    1
  22144. Taiwan is an inseparable part of China..
    1
  22145. Taiwan is an inseparable part of China..
    1
  22146. Taiwan is an inseparable part of China....
    1
  22147. Taiwan is an inseparable part of China...
    1
  22148. China's Propaganda is no match for the U.S propaganda...
    1
  22149. +Putera Usman China is world's 3rd largest weapon exporter so how is our military hardware inferior to those produced by, say France or even Germany? As for the anti-ship missiles, what you are describing could be referring to the older versions, but the latest models are much more sophisticated and can evade US missile defences and undermine the effectiveness of carrier strike groups, according to (theconversation.com/chinas-anti-ship-missiles-threaten-an-arms-race-in-the-western-pacific-73081 )
    1
  22150.  @wiz2387  What has eating dogs even got to do with China fu**ed the whole world? It's legal to eat dogs in 44 states in the US isn't it?
    1
  22151.  Zoon Geralt  How did USA acted swiftly and effectively? Trump has been downplaying the virus for months until now, USA is the world epicentre for Covid-19.
    1
  22152. China plans to connect the entire world with railway lines, from Africa to Middle East to Europe and even to the Americas through an underground line in the narrow Bering Strait. Map of World Land Bridge: http://schillerinstitute.org/strategic/2016/0825-sandmark-yemen/world_land-bridge-map.jpg
    1
  22153.  @blcsfo  The analogy is just an attempt to better explain the Russian/Ukraine crisis in a more relatable level. There is no lesson that the husband should kill his wife, it's just an analogy, not a story of a fable with a meaning behind it.
    1
  22154.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  I have never said that I'm from the PLA, you're just making claims about me that you can't prove that's all. I have never known any Senior Sergeant Tom Croydon, you're just pretending to know me so that you can make accusations about me without proof.
    1
  22155.  @luodeligesi7238  Putin has stated that Russia has no plans to occupy Ukraine. He stated many times that his mission is to demilitarize and de-nazify Ukraine, so what "decommunisation" are you talking about? Many experts also firmly believe Russia couldn't occupy Ukraine even if Putin wanted to. What Putin means is that there are Russian people living in Ukraine, but it's the artificial borders that created Ukraine.
    1
  22156.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Who is Sherreff Lobo? I've never heard of such a person, it's like you're just making up fake history that you and I never had. I did mentioned about Chinese fighters and missiles in some videos, but I have never said that I'm part of the People's Liberation Army, so why are you making up false accusations about me being from the PLA?
    1
  22157.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Just because I previously mentioned Chinese fighter jets and missiles in some other videos, doesn't mean that I'm from the People's Liberation Army. Most probably, PLA soldiers themselves may not be at liberty to discuss their weapons capabilities, so why would I claim to be from the PLA? It's like you're just making up fake history with me in order to accuse me of things I never said.
    1
  22158.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Since you claim to be this Sherreff Lobo yourself, then why not login to your Sherreff Lobo account and post a comment on here? Otherwise, it just looks like you're just making up fake history in order to accuse me of things that you cannot even substanciate.
    1
  22159.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  So you can't prove that you're this Sherreff Lobo person? Then what makes you claim that you have history with me when you can't even prove who you are?
    1
  22160.  @luodeligesi7238  "神州 Shenzhou the "decommunisation" quote comes from Putin's speech." The "decommunisation" quote by Putin is in response to Ukrainians demolishing statues of Lenin, for if not for Lenin, Ukraine wouldn't even have its borders today. Here's what Putin said: “As a result of Bolshevik policy, Soviet Ukraine arose, which even today can with good reason be called ‘Vladimir Ilyich Lenin’s Ukraine’. He is its author and architect. This is fully confirmed by archive documents… And now grateful descendants have demolished monuments to Lenin in Ukraine. This is what they call decommunisation. Do you want decommunisation? Well, that suits us just fine. But it is unnecessary, as they say, to stop halfway. We are ready to show you what real decommunisation means for Ukraine.” said Putin. Putin then declared Russia will officially recognize the eastern territories of Donetsk and Luhansk in Ukraine as sovereign independent states. So clearly, there's this very complex history between Ukraine and Russia, and that Ukraine's modern borders were drawn because of Lenin. For example, historically Crimea was never part of Ukrainian territory, yet was incorporated into Ukraine after the fall of the Soviet Union and that's why my analogy said the ex-husband left the ex-wife with a lot of land and children.
    1
  22161.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Then what's the point of you, if all you're doing is creating accounts just to create false history with others and accuse them of things that you can't even prove?
    1
  22162.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Then what's the point of you creating an account if all you're going to do is get rid of it? You can't even prove your accusations that you made about me.
    1
  22163.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Then you can't make up any history with me and claim that I said something to you in the past, when you can't even prove that your Sherreff Lobo. Who knows, maybe the real Sherreff Lobo is out there and you're just masquerading as him/her in your pretense to know me.
    1
  22164.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Then why claim that you know me if you wish you never knew me? You're the one claiming that you have history with me, yet now you wish you didn't? If anything, the one who's plain and homogenous is you, since I don't remember anything outstanding that you said. On the contrary, my talk of Chinese weapons and missiles clearly has you piqued enough to remember me.
    1
  22165. Gonzalo Lira is alive and well. Video:youtu.be/R2yeSOcNlgE
    1
  22166. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  22167. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  22168.  @robbleeker4777  Does it always have to be a zero sum game just because one is pro-CPC? There are people who are pro-CPC as well as pro-West and Cyrus Janssen is one such person. His videos are all about "Building Bridges, Not Walls" and promoting mutual cooperation, much like China's win-win foreign policy.
    1
  22169.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "The economy also greatly suffered as a result. Talented Hong Kong people are leaving for overseas." What are you talking about? Under Mr Lee, Hong Kong’s economy grew 2.7% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2023, so how is the economy greatly suffering, you tell me? Also, another point to note is that mainland China is home to the largest number of Hong Kong expatriates outside of Hong Kong.
    1
  22170.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "You can't do one way but ignore the others." This is the fallacy of the inverse. Denying the antecedent is a fallacy of inferring the inverse from the original statement.
    1
  22171.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou under Mr. Lee, there were massive people leaving the city as a result of the political crackdowns." Because many were involved in the 2019 Hong Kong riots, and participated in acts of violence, breaking shop windows, throwing molotov cocktails, and they now fear reprisal for their actions, which is why they fled Hong Kong. Do you agree that rioters who break the law, deserve punishment for their actions?
    1
  22172.  @bartonlee3594  The media coming from the West made a big hullabaloo about Jack Ma being supposedly "missing," yet it turns out he was in Thailand. So what makes you think Qin Gang is missing just because he wasn't seen for a while?
    1
  22173.  @bartonlee3594  It's astonishing that on one hand, people in the West proclaim to care about "privacy" and "personal life" but strangely when it comes to China, they want to know the exact location and status of Chinese politicians like Qin Gang and entrepreneurs like Jack Ma immediately.
    1
  22174.  @ladodah  So clearly misinformation is a big issue, then why is blocking them not an viable option? In China, the news is regulated by the Chinese government to weed out fake news that would otherwise cause harm. And fake news can cause harm, just look at 5G towers being set on fire by people because they mistakenly believe 5G causes Covid-19. In the United State, the news is unregulated so fake news can spread like wildfire and infect the populace, by then it would be too late.
    1
  22175.  @ladodah  But I read that whole paragraph you quoted, and the CPC did not state that Chairman Mao caused the famine. Also, you previously agreed with me that Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine and that weather was indeed a factor (like the 1958 Yellow River flood, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation). And since you brought up falsified crop yield, those were clearly the doing of the provincial governments, not Mao, because the local governments duped Mao into thinking there was a bumper harvest, so he thought there was sufficient crop to export to Russia. So you didn't actually explain how Mao caused the famine and if this part of the famine is man made, then it's the local provincial governments fault, not Mao Zedong's. How am I'm trying to shift the guilt from government to nature? I did admit that it's the local provincial governments deliberately exaggerating and lying about crop yields to Mao Zedong, didn't I?
    1
  22176. The government is merely reviving the "Mandate of Heaven" doctrine, where a competent ruler is allowed to stay in power and an incompetent leader will be eventually ousted from the throne by a rebellion, according to Heaven's decree. Although seemingly ancient, this "Mandate of Heaven" has successfully guided Chinese government for 5000 years since Shang Dynasty (1600 BC) and allowed Chinese civilization to survive the violent passage of history, where other great civilizations like Rome and Egypt have since fallen and broken apart.
    1
  22177. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  22178. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China..
    1
  22179. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  22180. Even the U.S acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China..
    1
  22181.  @sherm7107  About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    1
  22182.  @Student0Toucher  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  22183. Ancient Chinese people invented the Four Great Inventions 四大发明 which have gone on to influence the rest of the world. Paper and Printing made the recording and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has influenced the way modern warfare is fought. So why you claim China doesn't have brain power? As the world's most populous country, China has the largest number of geniuses, statistically speaking. Consider the standard bell curve for a population. Most people are nearly average, but there will be people who are above average but lesser in value. Now consider two bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people (China) and one with 326 million (USA). The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. Say the top 2% which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal. For every 1 American genius, there exists 4 Chinese geniuses. Large Populations Have More Geniuses iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html
    1
  22184. +St. Batu Why do you compare 1 country inventions with the Inventions of 4 countries? It seems a bit unfair to do so.
    1
  22185.  @StBatu  Besides Gunpowder, Chinese invented handcannons, handgrenades, fragmentation bombs, landmines, naval mines, rocket launchers, multi launch rocket systems and many more inventions.
    1
  22186.  @proudpanther701 said "神州 Shenzhou these things not inappropriate " What China is doing is removing the extremists elements (like that staff member in the video said) from Islam that's all. So what is China doing wrong? Even you yourself admitted that it is inappropriate so why can't Chinese government remove it from Islamic teachings in China? Other Islamic countries are always welcome to teach their own version of Islam, so why can't China do the same with our version of Islam?
    1
  22187.  @drmodestoesq  Have you seen the Chinese tourists visiting your countries and stimulating your tourist industry? Your schools and universities are host to many international exchange students from China, studying the same topics as their peers. In global research institutions, Chinese scientists are collaborating with foreign companies in joint R&D projects. Chinese companies are hiring your workers, and Chinese investors are buying up property in your countries to develop. So how is the government treating Chinese people badly?
    1
  22188.  @drmodestoesq  Why should ordinary Chinese people have a vote? Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (they may not turn up to vote) or they base their vote on emotions instead of logic. Or they simply lack political awareness to make important decisions regarding the country's future. Take Trump for example, he seduced votes from Americans with false promises of making America great again, even when he has zero political experience. In China's case, if people want to vote, they must prove themselves by joining the communist party (not easy to join and working their way up while garnering votes from other politically savvy members. Its not a perfect system, but it has produced leaders like President Xi, who has at least 30-40 years of political experience. I mean, you are charting the course of a country of 1.4 billion (300 million for USA) so of course you should have a strong and capable leader at the helm.
    1
  22189.  Danny D Dog  China's Covid-19 response wasn't perfect, but China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought The West Time. They Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html/
    1
  22190.  Danny D Dog  "神州 Shenzhou Identified and isolated? You mean IMPRISONED EVERY doctor that tried to warn the world about it?" Which doctor that tried to warn the world about it was imprisoned by China?
    1
  22191.  Danny D Dog  "神州 Shenzhou Or could you mean China letting millions of people enjoy the festivities 7 km away from their CONFIRMED site of the virus?" Back in December 2019, there was no confirmation of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus. Human-to-human transmission of Covid-19 was confirmed on the 20th Jan 2020, and Wuhan was locked down shortly after this confirmation.
    1
  22192.  Danny D Dog  "神州 Shenzhou Or maybe you meant letting 5 million people LEAVE the country" Except for chartered flights, no international passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since its lockdown on January 23, according to the Hubei Airport Group Company.
    1
  22193.  Danny D Dog  "神州 Shenzhou Or maybe you meant China PAYING the WHO like usual to say their propaganda" The United States contributes $893 million to the World Health Organization making USA WHO's largest contributor, and that's 10x more than China's contribution of $86 million over the same period. If anything, it would appear that the WHO is in the USA's pocket, not China's.
    1
  22194.  Danny D Dog  "神州 Shenzhou Literally EVERY ONE. Dr. Li Wenliang being he most famous one" Dr. Li Wenliang WASN'T IMPRISONED, he merely signed a form agreeing not to spread unproven rumors that's all, and he returned to work the next day. How was he arrested?
    1
  22195.  Danny D Dog  "神州 Shenzhou Lets just face the FACTS. China's response to the corona virus proves they WANTED It to spread through the world" Then why did China lockdown Wuhan and stopped all international flights coming out of Wuhan if they wanted it to spread? You said: "Giving them props on ANY of their actions from that time shows a clear sense of stupidity." Then you're just being unreasonable biased against China that's all.
    1
  22196.  Danny D Dog  Dr Li Wenliang wasn't imprisoned he returned to work the next day and was busy treating patients with Covid-19, yet why do you claim he was imprisoned? Which prison was he sent to, since you claimed he was imprisoned, you tell me?
    1
  22197.  Danny D Dog  You said Dr Li Wenliang was imprisoned, then where was he imprisoned? How long was he in prison for? You made the claim, yet you're unable to back up your claims?
    1
  22198.  Danny D Dog   Why resort to hurling vulgarities against me for my views? Because I support the Communist Party of China? Because my views happen to differ from yours? If China really wanted Covid-19 to spread then why did they lockdown Wuhan and stopped all international flights from departing Wuhan? Even the USA confirms this: Washington Post: Travel ban halts flights between Wuhan and U.S., as airports prepare to screen passengers for coronavirus More than half of the 566 flights scheduled from China’s Wuhan international airport were canceled. In an effort to contain the virus, authorities in Wuhan have shut down the region’s transportation network, including its three railway stations, 13 bus stations and its entire subway network. It is not clear when service, including flights out of Wuhan Tianhe International Airport will be restored.
    1
  22199.  Danny D Dog  So you don't know where he was imprisoned, nor how long he was imprisoned then why do you make the claim that Dr Li Wenliang was imprisoned without proof? He merely signed a form to not spread rumours and he returned to work the next day, treating Covid-19 patients so how was he imprisoned, you tell me?
    1
  22200.  Danny D Dog  So Dr Li Wenliang was dead, then didn't he died because of Covid-19? Then wasn't it because he wasn't in prisoned so he was helping treat other Covid-19 patients, caught the disease and died? Then how does that prove Dr Li Wenliang was imprisoned then?
    1
  22201.  Danny D Dog  If you want to talk about prison populations then it's actually America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate
    1
  22202.  Danny D Dog  So what did Dr Li Wenliang died of, if not Covid-19?
    1
  22203.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  Dr Li Wenliang was spreading rumours about the coronavirus being SARS (which is clearly untrue, Covid-19 is not SARS) he wrote in private WeChat group that "There are 7 confirmed cases of SARS at Huanan Seafood Market." (“华南水果海鲜市场确诊了7例SARS”) so the authorities stepped in to stop the spread of unproven rumours that's all.
    1
  22204.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  Taiwan did not confirmed human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus. Human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus was confirmed on 20th January 2020 in the mainland and Wuhan was locked down shortly after.
    1
  22205.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  Reuters: China confirms human-to-human transmission of new coronavirus (Dated to 20th January 2020)
    1
  22206.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  Because Dr Li Wenliang wrote "There are 7 confirmed cases of SARS at Huanan Seafood Market." (“华南水果海鲜市场确诊了7例SARS”) and it was clear that Covid-19 is not SARS, so the authorities stepped in to stop the spread of unproven rumours that's all.
    1
  22207.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  Taiwan's email on Dec 31st stating "7 Asymmetric Pneumonia cases" (which probably refers to the same cases Dr Li wrote) is just 7 cases that's all, so what's wrong with World Health Organization declaring an outbreak? 7 cases alone is insufficient to declare an epidemic let alone at pandemic at that point in time. And H2H transmission of the coronavirus was confirmed on 20th January 2020 and Wuhan was locked down shortly after this announcement.
    1
  22208.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  40,000 families gathering on January 14th, this was before the H2H transmission of the coronavirus was confirmed on 20th January 2020, so what's your point then? That Spring Festival banquet was held before the confirmation of H2H transmission of the coronavirus.
    1
  22209.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  Why do you resort to racially insulting Chinese by calling us Chy-knees? You deliberately spell it that way in order to spread anti-Chinese sentiment that's all. The Wuhan Institute of Virology had proper safety protocols, they even tested every staff member at the institute and found 0 cases of Covid-19 infection and antibodies that's why the lab leak theory is highly improbable as stipulated by the WHO team that investigated Wuhan.
    1
  22210.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  So WHO said that there's only a possibility of human-to-human (H2H) transmission of the novel coronavirus, so that is not a confirmation. Confirmation of H2H transmission of Covid19 was only made on 20th Jan 2020, and Wuhan was locked down shortly after.
    1
  22211. ​ 💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  Even US CDC expert Dr Anthony Fauci has praised Wuhan Institute of Virology scientist as qualified and professional. Dr. Anthony Fauci, the U.S. government's top infectious diseases expert, said the Chinese scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) that the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) collaborated with over the years are "qualified" and "highly respected." "The purpose of the research was very, very clear. It was to try to determine what was out there in the bat population that might be ultimately risky for us. It was done in the context of trying to find out what the precise environmental bat source was of SARS-CoV-2 so that we could prevent SARS-CoV-2," he said. "If you look at the research that was done, it was research that was highly recommended by peer review, our United States peer reviews. It got a very high score in the peer review system," he noted. He stressed that the research was done by qualified people. "… you're dealing with qualified, highly respected Chinese scientists. So it isn't what was made out to be about dealing with really, really bad people. Because those scientists were very well-respected in the scientific community internationally," he said.
    1
  22212.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  Even the U.S. government's top infectious diseases expert, Dr Anthony Fauci has defended the Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers as professional, qualified and well-respected. The report was highly recommended by peer review, even United States peer reviews and got a very high score in the peer review system.
    1
  22213.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  U.S. researcher who worked with Wuhan lab says virus leak 'highly unlikely' youtu.be/emY32MLd72A
    1
  22214.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  You said: Professor Yu Chuanhua said, “For example, there is data on a patient who became ill on September 29. The data shows that the patient has not undergone nucleic acid testing. The clinical diagnosis (CT diagnosis) is a suspected case. The patient has died. This data has not been confirmed and there is no time to death. It may also be wrong data." So what has your statement proved, other than a patient became ill on Sept 29? It's clearly not a confirmed case, merely a suspected case that's all? It's even possible that the data was wrong in the first place, according to your source.
    1
  22215.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  "神州 Shenzhou What kind of backwards regime punishes doctors for raising the Wuhan bat-flu alarm instead of investigating the situation?" Chinese authorities were investigating the situation, but Dr Li Wenliang had called the virus SARS (which is clearly untrue, Covid19 is not SARS) so the authorities had to investigate his spread of unproven rumors. And Dr Li did not went to jail, he signed a form agreeing not to spread unproven rumors, and he returned to work the next day.
    1
  22216.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  "Labels all Uighurs tera-wrists and threw millions of them into slave labour re-education gulags." Why can't you even spell "terrorists" properly? And when are Uighurs labelled as terrorists and you're claiming millions of them are in concentration camps? Where did you get this figure of millions in concentration camps? You said: "Jim Crow with Chy-knees characteristics" - CGTN last year blamed foreigners for importing" Because last year, China had the Covid19 situation largely under control, while it was raging out of country in other countries. Some foreign expats in China had tested positive for Covid19 so China did a massive sweep to contain the second outbreak. You said: "Why-tea mun-quey kulture" - Includes all colours and is widespread throughout Chy-nah." What is this? I don't even..., Please speak a language that makes sense. You said: "The satanic CCP funds Antifa and BLM" Antifa doesn't even exists, and BLM is funded by grassroots movements in your own countries.
    1
  22217.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  The WHO team that visited Wuhan on Jan 2020 visited the Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and their report concluded that the wet market was not the origin of Covid19, and has all but dismissed the Wuhan lab leak theory as "highly improbable", China is the only country in the world to have submit to a WHO investigation, no other country has had a WHO team investigate their countries
    1
  22218.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  Because China and the rest of the world were suffering from a pandemic during 2020, of course China needs to time to prepare for arrival of WHO team to visit Wuhan. About not providing requested data, China did not agree to hand over the original data, copies or photographs in order to protect patients' privacy and this is in accordance with international practice. Other than protecting the names, photographs and privacy of patients, the rest of the critical data were provided to the WHO team. China held a media conference on the COVID-19 origin tracing study on July 22. Liang Wannian, the Chinese leader of the World Health Organization-China joint expert team, said the data on the early patients were displayed in Wuhan for joint research by Chinese and foreign experts. Considered protecting patients' privacy, China did not agree to provide the original data, copies or photographs, which international experts also believe is international practice, said Liang. Expert responds on 'China not sharing raw data on COVID-19' claim youtu.be/W00s58f4kTg This is standard practice in company audits. You can view their records but not take the data nor copy it due to NDA or the document is classified for internal use only. The WHO team completed their investigation in Wuhan and their report is available. China is willing to allow a second investigation as long as it doesn't discount the outcomes of the first-phase investigation conducted by its own experts. In the 123-page report, all the scientists involved unanimously agreed that there were neither grounds nor a shred of evidence to link the virus' origin to the Wuhan lab leak theory. The report concluded that the outbreak was likely caused by the virus jumping from bats to humans through an intermediary animal and labeled the lab leak hypothesis as "extremely unlikely." The report suggested it was important to investigate "potential early events" of COVID-19 cases reported in different countries. Since you claim USA does not refuse WHO investigation, then why haven't USA allowed an investigation into Fort Detrick? If USA is truly uninvolved, then investigations into Fort Detrick will help dispel rumours and clear the USA name, unless they really have something to hide.
    1
  22219.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  Where's evidence of cover-up? China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought The West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    1
  22220.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  China is the only country in the world that the WHO Investigation Team visited to investigate Covid-19 origins and their investigation yields that Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market wasn't the origin of Covid-19. Wuhan Institute of Virology was visited by the WHO investigation team and the possibility of a lab leak has been dismissed as highly unlikely. Many industry experts repetitively endorsed the safety of the lab and the impossibility of the lab leak theory. The National Biosafety Laboratory of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in central China was officially put into operation in 2018, becoming China's first BSL-4 laboratory – highest safety level of all – conducting researches of many deadly viruses in the world. A BSL-4 laboratory is also called a P4 lab. The letter "P" stands for pathogen, the higher the number after it, the more dangerous the pathogen is. A rating of P4 designates a lab as a maximum-security area. The P4 lab is mainly used for research on deadly viruses, especially those without a known cure or a vaccine. news.cgtn.com/news/2021-08-08/COVID-19-origin-How-safe-is-the-Wuhan-Virology-Institute-12z2oHxXrfq/index.html Yuan Zhiming, director of Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory, introduced in a previous interview with CGTN that the lab has strict measures to keep researchers safe from the pathogens and also keep the pathogens in the lab. "We have a complex system for electricity, air filtration, emergency shower, automations, fire safety and life support. All these facilities work to ensure a negative-pressure confined space." If the USA was truly uninvolved, then investigations into Fort Detrick will help dispel rumours and clear the USA name and prove China's accusations wrong. Unless the USA have something to hide.
    1
  22221.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  So according to your time line there was no confirmation of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus back in 2019. China only confirmed human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus on 20th January 2020 and Wuhan was locked down shortly after. Source: China Confirms New Coronavirus Spreads From Humans to Humans nytimes.com/2020/01/20/world/asia/coronavirus-china-symptoms.html (Dated to 20th January 2020) Like I said earlier, China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them.
    1
  22222.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  China is the only country in the world that the WHO Investigation Team visited to investigate Covid-19 origins and their investigation yields that Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market wasn't the origin of Covid-19. Wuhan Institute of Virology was visited by the WHO investigation team and the possibility of a lab leak has been dismissed as highly unlikely. If the USA was truly uninvolved, then investigations into Fort Detrick will help dispel rumours and clear the USA name and prove China's accusations wrong. Unless the USA have something to hide.
    1
  22223.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  "神州 Shenzhou Nope ,it's according to the WHO public documentation." Show me the WHO public documentation. Here's video of WHO team dismisses theory COVID-19 leaked from Wuhan lab youtu.be/qMnhhgrNnfs
    1
  22224.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  So you got no proof? The WHO team did arrived in Wuhan on January 2021 and they investigated Wuhan Institute of Virology and all but dismissed the possibility of a lab leak. Here's another video: A World Health Organization (WHO) mission investigating the origins of Covid-19 have dismissed a theory that the virus came from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. Video: WHO team dismiss theory Covid-19 leaked from Chinese lab - BBC News youtu.be/P1T8KT_hOLs Peter Ben Embarek, the head of the World Health Organization (WHO) mission, said it was "extremely unlikely" that the virus leaked from a lab in the Chinese city of Wuhan, and more work was needed to identify the source of the virus.
    1
  22225.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  Where's the publicly available information? And what makes you think a report released by the Republican party is somehow more accurate than a WHO team investigating Wuhan Institute of Virology and dismissing the lab-leak theory as "highly improbable"? Does your Republican report prove that Covid-19 was a lab-leak? It doesn't, so what's your point? You are the one cherry-picking some Republican report, while ignoring the WHO investigation report all but dismissing the lab-leak theory. Why is President Biden taking the 'Lab Leaks' conspiracy seriously now? youtu.be/6tjrRikc8CE
    1
  22226.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  I've been to the WHO's website, their investigations revealed that Covid-19 did not originate in Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market, it entered the market from elsewhere. The WHO investigation also all but dismissed the possibility of a lab leak from Wuhan Institute of Virology so who says I don't have access to WHO website? I thought you were referring to Republican Party report, so what has the WHO website even got to do with this? And what makes you think a report released by the Republican party is somehow more accurate than a WHO team investigation in Wuhan?
    1
  22227.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  China did not allow WHO to investigate because Wuhan was still pretty much in lockdown for months during that time. Also, the WHO investigation team initially failed to clear their VISA applications, only once the proper documentation was in order were they allowed to visit Wuhan. But eventually, the WHO team did arrive in Wuhan to conduct investigations. As for China refuse to hand over the requested data, that was "misquoted" by the New York Times. Scientists from the World Health Organization (WHO) recently refuted claims in a New York Times article that Chinese scientists refused to hand over important data during their trip to China to study the origins of the COVID-19 virus. The New York Times' accusation distorting the truth with their quotes "intendedly twisted," criticized the team members. Instead, they said their research work in China was supported by "trust and openness" with critical data gained throughout the visit. "This was NOT my experience on WHO mission. As lead of animal/environment working group I found trust and openness with my China counterparts. We DID get access to critical new data throughout," Peter Daszak, zoologist and member of the WHO-China research team, wrote on Twitter. WHO experts slam NYT report on China trip, say they were 'misquoted' news.cgtn.com/news/2021-02-14/WHO-experts-slam-NYT-report-on-China-trip--XRJ5iXk0H6/index.html
    1
  22228.  💣 Gaylik 🤯 Lobotomy 💥  That's what New York Times did, they cherry-picked statements and twisted statements from WHO. Scientists from the World Health Organization (WHO) recently refuted claims by The New York Times and the Wall Street Journal that Chinese scientists refused to hand over important data during their trip to the central Chinese city of Wuhan to study the potential source of the COVID-19. The accusation distorted the truth with their quotes "intendedly twisted," said the team members. Video: WHO experts slam NYT and WSJ reports on Wuhan trip, says they were 'intendedly misquoted' youtu.be/5cNpCIWQ2xE
    1
  22229.  @TheFivegoodemperors  Chinese police officers are needed to translate any incident involving Chinese tourists in Italy. And Chinese police can also help translate the Italian laws to Chinese.
    1
  22230.  @TheFivegoodemperors  Translation apps have their limitations. How to fully explain the full intricacies of police laws to every single Chinese tourist? Why not have Chinese police officers handy to handle disputes involving Chinese tourists?
    1
  22231.  @TheFivegoodemperors  Mandarin Chinese is the world's most spoken language by number of speakers after all. Even in the Internet, Chinese is the 2nd most common language in the Internet after English, so there are so many websites in Chinese. Source: Top 10 Languages Used On the internet today speakt.com/top-10-languages-used-internet/ So is there really a dying need for Chinese to learn English? Most Chinese (and other East Asians like Japanese and Koreans) tend to be proud of our language and many Chinese people indeed struggle with English even till today. Video: Are Chinese people really bad in English? youtu.be/ehAuEXnYDMk Even Japanese struggle with English. It's the same in East Asia, we Asians should be proud of our languages. Video: When Japanese speak English youtu.be/VWBE157FaZY
    1
  22232.  @TheFivegoodemperors   GorillaGuerilla   GorillaGuerilla  According to your 1st source: Teams will offer language and legal help to mainland visitors under landmark exchange between the two countries, so this supports my earlier point that they will serve as translators. Also, while they're priority is for mainland tourists, that does not mean that they will not help with translation issues with other tourists such as Chinese Americans, Chinese Malaysians, Chinese Singaporeans, etc. These tourists may speak English, but the Italian police may not necessarily do, so Chinese police can once again serve as translators to bridge the language gap. What's "trusting" authorities from the mainland even got to do with this? If Chinese police have limited authority in Italy like you said, then what's there to be afraid? Also taken from your source: Four Chinese officers received special training in Beijing before their assignment, and spoke Italian as well as English, Xinhua ­reported. Each has been paired with a local partner and they have been deployed at the busiest tourist attractions in Rome and Milan. You appear to be citing your own personal experiences to support your claim that many, if not most Chinese Americans hate the CCP/PRC, based on your personal experience. China is actually the world's 4th most visited country, after France, Spain and the United States, according to World Tourism Rankings, seeing some 62.9 million international tourists to China in 2018. Source: World Tourism Rankings wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings China is also the most popular tourism destination in Asia, surpassing even other Asian tourists destinations like Japan, Korea, India, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, etc in sheer number of tourists. You just seemed extremely negative about this whole police program. Even earlier you said "If UK/USA police sent to Beijing and the reason given was to help tourists/translate, they'd be labelled as a foreign imperialist spies on Weibo and killed by a mob" but what makes you harbor such extreme negativity towards China and our people? According to your 1st source, Italian police will head to Beijing and Shanghai to offer a similar service to Italian visitors in a few months. And China’s Belt and Road Initiative is a long term plan by CCP to connect China and Europe, so of course, you'll won't see the results in just 5 years. China can afford to pull this off, because CCP abolished the presidential term limits, so our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition the future. Whereas in America for example, their US presidents eventually have to step down as president once their term limits are over after 4-8 years, so at the most, American presidents can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. USA is only interested in short term gains, whereas China is interested in long term benefits.
    1
  22233.  @blockedinchina6015  What's political dissidents even got to do with this? I mean, why can't China send 10 policemen to Italy to help with translation issues? How did this suddenly morph into a discussion about the Communist Party of China?
    1
  22234.  @sp.8727  Of course tourists wanting to visit another country should at least learn some of the basics of the local language, at least enough to get around. Like in China, there are some foreign tourists that come here and some of them (not all of them) expect our signs to be in English instead of Chinese. I feel the same way towards these foreign tourists as to Chinese tourists behavior in other countries. Learning basic Italian may be sufficient to get you around in Italy, but when legal issues crop up, that's where Chinese police officers come in to attend to legal issues between Chinese tourists and Italian police. As for translation software, they are improving yes, but a real interpreter is still the best solution to translating legal issues between countries. I mean, would you trust a translation software to explain your situation succinctly to a foreign police officer? Personally, I prefer an officer that understands the language I'm speaking, and probably most Chinese tourists in Italy would feel that way. And as for providing more funding and resources for Chinese embassies, aren't Chinese policemen part of the resources being sent to Italy? Since Italy has no problems with this arrangement, then why not continue with this?
    1
  22235. +Voltage Drop Who's crying here? Aren't American workers the ones complaining about Chinese workers "stealing" their jobs? I mean, consider this simple question: Are American workers willing to work for the same low pay as Chinese workers? If not, then why blame Chinese workers for being willing to work for low pay, under poor working conditions, etc? Chinese workers make products like smartphones, computers, gadgets, etc cheap, so that you people save money on living expenses. Money you saved that can then be spent on cars, housing, rent, school fees, tuition fees, doctors fees, hospital bills, etc.
    1
  22236.  @endribardhyli1340  The U.S overtook Great Britain in 1945, after WWII.
    1
  22237.  @endribardhyli1340  You said: "It overtook the entire GDP British Empire in 1916 which ruled a quarter of the world." Yes, the U.S overtook the British Empire's GDP, but like you said Britain still ruled a quarter of the world at that time. So 1916 wasn't the actual time that U.S completely overtook Britain since they still had their British colonies. You said: "In 1945 after the end of WWII the entire GDP of the world equaled the US." Correct, after WWII, the emergence of the Cold War between the U.S and the Soviet Union is when U.S has overtaken Britain. Also, if you read my comment carefully, the 20th century was around the time the U.S overtook Britain as the world's largest economy.
    1
  22238.  @endribardhyli1340  神州 Shenzhou In 1916 the US overtook Great Britain and all of its dominions, 1916 is during the 20th century, so my point that USA overtook Britain in the 20th century still stands.
    1
  22239.  @endribardhyli1340  So I take it that you've accepted that the U.S overtook Britain in the 20th century? Then we are in agreement and my original point still stands.
    1
  22240.  @endribardhyli1340  "神州 Shenzhou No you can't overtake a nation twice." Logically speaking, it is indeed possible for nations to overtake nations twice, or 3 times, 4 times, and so on. Nations can rise and fall over the passage of time, and there are bound to be instances where a nation overtakes another twice. But I never actually said that in this case, I merely pointed out that the U.S overtook Britain in the 20th century, and that my point still stands.
    1
  22241. There are statistically more people with Genius IQ in China than there are people in the United States. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is about 4.3 times that of the US population, then statistically speaking, for every 1 American genius there are 4 Chinese geniuses.
    1
  22242. Philippines actually views U.S.A as an "unreliable ally"
    1
  22243. It's the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (phobia of the West being overrun by Asians) mentality that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, such that the thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China surpassing the U.S someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    1
  22244.  @floydsemlow8253  Weren't you the guy who said: "神州 Shenzhou that's debatable" now you're telling me to take my debate somewhere else?
    1
  22245.  @floydsemlow8253  I was busy for the past few days that's why I was nowhere to be found. But now that I'm ready, why do you open yourself up to debate, yet decline to do so afterwards?
    1
  22246. 3-Finger salute looks like someone "swearing an oath"
    1
  22247.  @VeenSauce  China is pouring funds into Research and Development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending and catching up fast to the United States. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending Countries by research and development spending: 1. United States ($511.1 billion) 2. China ($451.9 billion) 3. European Union ($379.0 billion) 4. Japan ($165.7 billion) 5. Germany ($118.8 billion) 6. South Korea ($91.6 billion)
    1
  22248.  @VeenSauce  Besides R&D spending, China publishes more scientific articles and technical journals in physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology,_and _earth and space sciences than even the United States! Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending 1. China (426,165 articles) 2. United States (408,985 articles) 3. India (110,320 articles) 4. Germany (103,122 articles) 5. United Kingdom (97,527 articles) 6. Japan (96,536 articles) ... This implies a growing number of discoveries being made and scientific articles being published in Chinese language. Chinese researchers hold the advantage by having access to English language papers as well as Chinese. But Western researchers may find the Chinese language barrier to be an obstacle when accessing Chinese language papers. Therefore Chinese innovation is only going to grow. How is this deflecting then?
    1
  22249.  @VeenSauce  China's nightlife is teeming with activity. Skyscrapers light up at night, pictures dance along the city skylines, and big LCD screens entice with advertisements. Modern buildings come alive with colorful displays, while traditional buildings highlight Chinese architecture. Bridges and highways are illuminated, cars race along our roads and even boats along our rivers are lit up. Here is a short 2-min clip about the beautiful night life of 11 Chinese cities: Video: Beautiful Night View of China 2016 youtube.com/watch?v=G7ZRa-w9xyA
    1
  22250.  @VeenSauce  China is home to world's largest high speed railway, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very fast and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented with balancing small objects on their edges, like coins, stationery, mobile phones, in trains moving at 350 kph and the objects remained undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for a long period. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE
    1
  22251.  @VeenSauce  China has surveillance systems because as the world's most populous country, China faces a shortage of policemen to maintain order. According to the following source, China only has a mere 115 officers per 100,000 inhabitants, which is below the national median of 300 officers per 100,000 inhabitants. Source: List of countries and dependencies by number of police officers wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_number_of_police_officers Thus, China uses massive surveillance systems and advanced facial recognition software to help make up for the shortfall in policemen. Instead of deploying 1,000 officers, only a handful of officers are needed to maintain the surveillance systems. Now with China's advances in artificial intelligence, sometimes no one is needed at all.
    1
  22252.  @starrdust3625  The number of Christians in Communist China is growing so steadily that it by 2030 it could have more churchgoers than America! Source: China on course to become 'world's most Christian nation' within 15 years telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/10776023/China-on-course-to-become-worlds-most-Christian-nation-within-15-years.html So what makes you think Christians are being persecuted for their beliefs? Are you sure you've been in China for a decade? Which part(s) of China did you visit?
    1
  22253. +Brett Demauna China is slowly making the shift towards renewable energy. China built the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam, to help control the flood waters of Yangtze River and limit the damage, and also provide renewable energy to China in the process. China is in fact the world's largest producer of hydroelectric energy. But of course, it will take time to shift away from coal power. Other leaders like President Trump promise to bring back coal power to US, and he even withdrew USA from the 2017 Paris Climate Accord, so USA don't have to be bound to keep emission levels low.
    1
  22254. +Brett Demauna Besides our world's largest hydroelectric powerstations, China is also investing in solar energy to help relieve our dependence on coal. As of January 2017, the largest solar power plants in the world is the 850 MW Longyangxia Dam Solar Park in China for PV. We even have the world's largest solar park, that located in the water, in Huainan City, East China's Anhut. Video:World's largest floating solar farm in Eastern China youtube.com/watch?v=qKpYH5SYUeo But of course, like you said, switching from coal power to renewable energy is a slow process, and it will take time to make that change completely. But countries like USA, have been polluting the Earth for over 200-300 years, whereas China only industrialized about 30 years ago. So in my personal opinion, I don't think its fair that Western countries can continuously pollute the Earth for many centuries, yet despise our country for polluting the Earth for mere decades. Western countries had much more time to switch to renewable energy, as compared to China, yet China is rapidly changing given this short timespan of our industrialization.
    1
  22255. +Angelo Joseph Wong During the Korean war, PLA troops were mostly poorly trained peasants, our weapons were crappy, our air and naval support were nonexistent, our supply lines were overextended and we only had North Korean troops for allies (Soviet Union mostly provided tank support that's all) whereas South Korea had the combined armies of USA, UK, France, Canada, Australia, Philippines, and 10 other countries. Their soldiers were battle hardened and well-trained, their equipment superior, and they had air and naval support and Japan was nearby providing logistical support. Yet the Americans still did not win the Korean war? Even with the combined armies of 16 countries, against PLA with only North Korean troops for allies? With your superior troops and equipment and air and naval support, against our poorly trained Chinese soldiers, with our inferior equipment and lack of support?
    1
  22256.  @designengrwafu5310  What use is the Mutual Defense treaty if the United States didn't even help Philippines at Scarborough Shoal? It was initially expected for the United States to defend the territory of the Philippines during the Scarborough Shoal standoff as the two nations had a Mutual Defense Treaty, however, the United States chose to move itself away from the tension, and used 'verbal protests' against China instead. Source: Wikipedia: Scarborough Shoal The aftermath of the standoff ultimately strained Philippines-China relations and Philippines-United States relations, resulting in Filipino officials calling the United States an 'unreliable ally', a statement echoed by other nations. Source: United States An Unreliable Ally, Says Philippines https://philnews.ph/2016/10/07/united-states-unreliable-ally-says-dfa-sec-yasay/
    1
  22257.  @designengrwafu5310  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Mozambique, Tanzania, Ghana, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger, being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, etc, even in the 21st century. The USA is bombing those countries and enacting regime change by cutting off those countries "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now, Assad of Syria and Maduro of Venezuela are at risk and President Trump just narrowly avoided starting a fresh war with Iran.
    1
  22258.  @designengrwafu5310  Japan's military is bound by WWII surrender treaty (Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution 日本国憲法第9条) outlawing war as a means to settle international disputes involving the state. This means that Japan will not attack another country except in self defense. Japan is also bound by the treaty to only maintain a self defence military at all times. So why do you think Japan will join in a hypothetical war between China and the Philippines? Why do you claim Japan is fortifying its military when Article 9 prevents them from owning any military other than a self defence force?
    1
  22259.  @designengrwafu5310  Japan's economy is currently in a slump today, and they are suffering from an aging population and low birth rate, so what makes you think Japan would want to join a hypothetical war between the Philippines and China? Why would Japanese soldiers want to die for Philippines sake you tell me? China is Japan's largest trading partner, whereas Philippines is Japan's 14th, so why would Japan want to jeopardise its economic relations with China for Filipinos sake?
    1
  22260.  @designengrwafu5310  Filipinos been fighting wars? Have your heard of the American-Philippine war then? When Philippines was still a Spanish colony, the Americans gave their word to the Filipinos that they would grant independence to Philippines if they sided with USA. But then US broke their word and took possession of the Philippines from Spain, which resulted in the American-Philippine War in which 4,000 American soldiers died, but 20,000 Filipino Soldiers died, and a whopping 250,000 Filipino civilians died Video: The Philippine American War-The Shocking Truth youtube.com/watch?v=bN2wrZGcs8s&t=299 In the end, the Americans won and Philippines became a US colony. Can't you see who is the real enemy of Philippines here? Why do you still trust USA when it committed such horrible act upon Philippines and its people?
    1
  22261.  @designengrwafu5310  I mean, why your Filipino soldiers sacrificed their lives on Korean soil in order to serve the U.S's interests? At least PLA soldiers fought to defend our neighboring ally, but what does Filipino soldiers dying in Korean War do to serve Philippine's interests? Do the South Koreans even appreciate Philippines efforts? And you claim Filipino soldiers are "won" against PLA (even when you had 15 other countries allies) during Korean War, then why did Philippines lose the Scarborough Shoal standoff to China you tell me? Did South Korea help Philippines in Scarborough Shoal standoff, after what your 7,000 Filipino soldiers died for them in Korean War? And the U.S and Philippines had Mutual Defense Treaty, yet U.S did absolutely nothing for Philippines during Scarborough Shoal standoff, until even Filipino officials calling the United States an 'unreliable ally'?
    1
  22262.  @MarkYeung1  Even before 2016, America has a bad reputation. The U.S is a warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, etc. even before 2016. Donald Trump may have been elected in 2016, but for all his faults, Trump did not start any new U.S wars while he was in office as president of the USA.
    1
  22263. Chinese government controls the Chinese corporations for the benefit of China. American corporations control the American government for profit and funding.
    1
  22264.  @josesilva4171  "is either that or successfully push the invader out." Why not explore a third option, where Zelenskyy sues for peace? That would put an end to the bloodshed, while allowing Russia and Ukraine to keep their current territories, while preserving the remaining Ukrainian soldiers lives. Isn't this a much better option than Ukrainians fighting till the last one?
    1
  22265.  @josesilva4171  "What would you feel if the USA entered Guangzhou/Shanghai or Beijing?" There is a U.S embassy located in those 3 regions isn't it?
    1
  22266.  @josesilva4171  "no. Imagine being your country." Stick to Russo-Ukraine conflict. The circumstances of a mainland China-Taiwan conflict would be vastly different from the Russo-Ukraine conflict, so why are you attempting to compare them?
    1
  22267.  @josesilva4171  "Ukrainian interests having Russians occupying their land?" Because Ukrainians get to keep their lives (instead of following you and fighting till the very last one) as well as any land that's currently under their control. The real reason why this exchange makes no sense is that why are you unable to consider the third option, which is Zelenskyy suing for peace?
    1
  22268. Donald Trump wasn't the cause, he's a symptom of American dissatisfaction. As much as you try to singluarly pin the blame on him, Trump did not start any new wars while he was in power, and Trump was interested in making deals with other world leaders. But look at Biden, and he's literally detested by other world leaders and unable to make deals with anyone.
    1
  22269. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  22270. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  22271. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  22272. @ELIANA GLEN SARMIENTO In Xinjiang, the Uighurs drive cotton-harvesting machines to harvest truckloads of cotton, yet Westerners accuse Xinjiang of forced Uighur labour. Video: Xinjiang, China’s top cotton producer https://youtu.be/ocVn5Cn101M
    1
  22273.  @24sec2go  I noticed sometimes, my YouTube comment gets deleted, 20 seconds after posting. It's good to check your comments after 20s, just to see if YouTube had deleted it.
    1
  22274.  @ChinaSongsCollection  What I often do is check the total number of comments (n) before posting, and see whether it increases to (n+1) after posting.
    1
  22275. If the leader has shown to be competent and capable, then I see nothing wrong with leaving him in power for while longer, to maximise the benefits to China.
    1
  22276. Juan David Neira President Xi is conducting anti-corruption crackdown, which is popular among the ordinary people and unpopular among rich Chinese, so why not leave him in power longer to carry out his policies?
    1
  22277.  @everythingandmore5537  Even if not China, Capitalism will eventually start seeking out other low-wage countries like India or Vietnam to exploit and set up factories there. But by choosing to set up in China, the Capitalists are "walking into the lion's den," a trap set by the Communists, whom now control the means of production and can dictate terms to the Capitalists. That's why in China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, whereas in USA, the U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit. As the saying goes: "one must keep his friends close, and his enemies even closer." By setting up shop here in China, the Capitalists have the means of production taken over by the Communists, and that's how China is slowly changing the capitalistic nature of the world. Yes there were poor working conditions in past by capitalists like Apple and Foxconn, but Chinese government law is forcing companies to clean up their working conditions. Apple has been fined several times by the Chinese government for bad working conditions. Source: Apple under fire again for working conditions at Chinese factories theguardian.com/technology/2014/dec/19/apple-under-fire-again-for-working-conditions-at-chinese-factories
    1
  22278.  @everythingandmore5537  Agreed that as a result of capitalistic reforms by Deng Xiaoping, corruption began creeping into the Communist Party of China and infiltrated everywhere. Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. The capitalists are to blame for corruption in the Communist Party of China, but President Xi Jinping is willing to tackle the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party through anti-corruption campaigns. But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign. But after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption. Also, why should ordinary Chinese people go on strike and demand democracy? Why should Chinese people overthrow our government? The CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China? Isn't it better to purge corruption in the communist party through anti-corruption campaigns, rather than overthrow the government?
    1
  22279.  @everythingandmore5537  "神州 Shenzhou There will not be chaos. The CCP will not have any support from ordinary Chinese." A long term Harvard University study has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. Source: Harvard survey finds Chinese satisfaction with govt rises china.org.cn/china/2020-07/17/content_76281590.htm So what makes you think the CPC doesn't enjoy the support of the people? What makes you think there will not be chaos if the Chinese government is overthrown, when the CPC enjoys such majority support?
    1
  22280.  @everythingandmore5537  So since according to Harvard University study, life in China has vastly improved from 30 years ago under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, then why should ordinary Chinese people overthrow our government and establish Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so? Why should China abandon a political system that works for China and adopt Western brand of democracy? Also, what makes you think it has nothing to do with the CPC? At first, ordinary Chinese people did not know how to do business, build factories, nor did we have the technology to manufacture our own products. It's actually thanks to CPC policy that foreign companies agree to transfer technology as part of the terms of setting up shop here in China, that ordinary Chinese finally have access to technology to start our own factories and businesses. So isn't it thanks to the CPC that China industrialise? Also, the corruption seeped into the CPC because of Deng Xiaoping's capitalistic reforms (like you said earlier), why should China overthrow our government and establish Western brand of democracy? Western democracy doesn't mean that corruption is absent, in fact, President Xi is doing an excellent job tackling corruption in China, why should Chinese overthrow the government?
    1
  22281.  @everythingandmore5537  "神州 Shenzhou The CCP has no relevance to the new China." If nor for the Communist Party of China, China today would still be a divided country, fighting among ourselves instead of the strong unified country we are today. When Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today. You keep on saying "Most ordinary Chinese … Most ordinary Chinese … Most ordinary Chinese …" but where are your sources? Are you even a Chinese citizen yourself? I gave you Harvard University study showing that around 80-90 % of Chinese citizens support the CPC, you got nothing to refute this, you just keep claiming most ordinary Chinese say this or that. Where's your proof?
    1
  22282.  @everythingandmore5537   "神州 Shenzhou To settle some points. It was the Americans who drove Japanese out of china." Wrong, it was the Soviet invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria that was the last campaign fought of WWII and finally caused Japan to surrender at the end of WWII. The Americans didn't even invade the Japanese mainland, how did they drove the Japanese out of China, you tell me? It was Chairman Mao who seized lands from the corrupt landlords and redistributed it to the dirt-poor peasants. Had Chiang won, the peasants would have remained slaves to the corrupt landlords, taxing peasant's work for their entire lives, if not for Mao and the communists chasing the Kuomintang out of the mainland to Formosa (Taiwan). This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while solidifying the communists right to rule the mainland. Yes, Qing清 Dynasty China conquered Han China, Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, and made them all part of China, so why should Chairman Mao only ruled Han China? Since the Qing Dynasty China, China was no longer a Han-only civilization, the Qing Dynasty considered both Han and non-Han as Chinese. After conquering "China proper", the Manchus identified their state as "China" (中國, Zhōngguó; "Middle Kingdom"), and the emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, Tibet and other areas) as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that "China" only meant Han areas. The Qing emperors proclaimed that both Han and non-Han peoples were part of "China". They used both "China" and "Qing" to refer to their state in official documents, international treaties, included Chinese, Manchu, and Mongol languages, and "Chinese people" (中國之人 Zhōngguó zhī rén;) referred to all subjects of the empire. In the Chinese-language versions of its treaties and its maps of the world, the Qing government used "Qing" and "China" interchangeably. So who are you to tell Chinese that Xinjiang, Tibet, Inner Mongolia, etc weren't part of China when they were historically part of Qing Dynasty? And lastly, you're using anecdotes from your ordinary ethnic Chinese friends in your area and the mainland as evidence that "Most ordinary Chinese this … most ordinary Chinese that?" Whereas I quoted an actual Harvard University survey revealing that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the CPC, so how can your anecdotal evidence compare to actual surveys by Harvard University?
    1
  22283.  @everythingandmore5537  You yourself admitted that "The CCP allowed a pathway to ordinary Chinese for food, shelter and jobs" why did you contradict yourself later when you said "The CCP did not do any work"?
    1
  22284.  Charles Schmidd  Chinese companies want to expand business with North Korea, exporting food, medicines into the country and building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways in DPRK. But they can't doubt much when the -USA sanctions North Korea* and stymied it's economic growth.
    1
  22285.  @everythingandmore5537  And President Xi Jinping is tackling the corruption (introduced through Deng's economic reforms) seeping through the Communist Party, through anti-corruption campaigns. Why do you want Chinese people to overthrow our government, plunging China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country? Because you don't like our government? You're not even Chinese citizen yourself for crying out loud. And again this "Most ordinary Chinese…" you're just giving anecdotal evidence when I shown that according to Harvard University study, around 80-90 % of Chinese citizens support the CPC, you don't speak on behalf of "Most ordinary Chinese…"
    1
  22286.  @everythingandmore5537  What makes you claim "Actually china can progress faster without the CCP"? Look at China before the communists came to power and China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past during Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949). But today under People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  22287.  @everythingandmore5537  "神州 Shenzhou China was a world economic powerhouse before Mao took power in 1949. Mao managed to turn china into a zero economic power." How? When Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Chairman Mao, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today. Who's going to believe your claims that China was economic powerhouse before the Communists came to power in 1949 under Chairman Mao? Westerners looked down on China before 1949, nobody expected China to succeed under the Communists, yet look at where China is today and how far China has progressed under the leadership of the Communist Party of China.
    1
  22288.  @everythingandmore5537  "神州 Shenzhou China was economic powerhouse before Mao took over. Just check the statistics." China was dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) before the Communists took over in 1949, where does statistics show China was an economic powerhouse before? There was no Made-in-China brand prior to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, what economic powerhouse are you talking about? …… You said: "The Americans defeated the Japanese and allowed Mao to defeat Chiang." Japan clearly refused to surrender even after 2 atomic bombings by USA and USA didn't even invade the Japanese mainland. The last campaign fought of WWII was the Soviet invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria that finally caused Japan to surrender at the end of WWII. So if anything, we should be thanking the communists for ending WWII. And why did the Nationalist KMT lose the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, as well as solidifying the communists right to rule the mainland.
    1
  22289.  @daledykes9253  In China, the government's approach to Covid is to sacrifice businesses to save lives. Whereas the United State's approach is to sacrifice lives to save businesses.
    1
  22290.  @daledykes9253  So you disagree with the zero covid policy, then what's the alternative? Should Shanghai and Beijing simply do nothing and let millions of Chinese elderly get infected and lose their lives?
    1
  22291.  @albback8176  But there are some elderly people who are reluctant to take the vaccine so the lockdowns are to preserve their lives. While there is certainly some disgruntlement regarding the lockdown, the majority of the people in China actually support the lockdowns as necessary.
    1
  22292.  @daledykes9253  What non-existent pathogen are you referring to?
    1
  22293.  @agusedyanto3087  Indeed. China has opened up the Wuhan Institute of Virology to WHO investigation team, and their findings rule out the possibility of a lab leak as highly unlikely. The next step should be to investigate other leads, such as Fort Detrick in the United States.
    1
  22294.  @daledykes9253  Loss of income due to lockdown is tragic I agree, but money lost can always be recouped later. But once those elderly lose their lives to Covid, then no amount of money can buy back lives that have been lost.
    1
  22295.  @aJarrowLad525  I think if a liar spreads his/her own lies long enough for a long time, they'll eventually start believing in their own lies, despite seeing the truth.
    1
  22296. It's called International Space Station, even ex-Soviet Russia can join, yet China is excluded because of Chinese exclusion policy of NASA. Source: Chinese exclusion policy of NASA wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_exclusion_policy_of_NASA
    1
  22297.  @qrp1123  Korea was once a unified country, but then Japanese invaded Korea and after Japanese surrender, Korea was (needlessly) divided into North Korea (USSR) and South Korea (USA). Why was there a need to divide Korea? Wasn't USA partially responsible for the division of Korea? Of the two Koreas initially, North Korea was stronger and wanted to end this humiliating separation and unify Korea, which they nearly succeeded in doing so (99% unified) But the USA suddenly declare war on North Korea and joined this internal civil war of Korea, pushing the North Koreans back, past the 38th parallel (line of division) and right up to China's doorstep (near Liaoning province). Thus China reluctantly joined the war to push US forces back to the 38th parallel.
    1
  22298.  @qrp1123  What makes you think Chinese people lack outside information? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study and play. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your lands and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded by international exchange students from China, studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese businesses like Huawei, Lenovo, Xiaomi, Oppo, ZTE, etc, are expanding overseas and Chinese investors are buying up real estate and property in your lands. So why you think Chinese people lack outside information? Chinese people can be found virtually everywhere in the world, since we make up 20% of the world's entire population.
    1
  22299.  @qrp1123  What makes you think USA won the war against Japan? The Japanese Emperor Hirohito clearly refused to surrender to USA, even after two atomic bombings, and the US troops didn't even invade the Japanese mainland at all. The last campaign fought of WWII that finally ended the war, was the Soviet Invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria, that finally caused Japan to surrender. Source: Soviet invasion of Manchuria was the LAST campaign of the Second World War wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Manchuria So what makes you think USA won the war against the Japanese, and that we should be "thankful" to the USA? The USA didn't even send troops to attack Japanese mainland, and it was the Soviet Invasion of Manchuria that finally ended the War.
    1
  22300.  @qrp1123  That was AFTER the war ended like you said. Japan surrendered only after Soviet invasion of Japanese occupied Manchuria (which was the last campaign fought of WWII) like I shown previously. Japan did not surrender to USA, even after the bombings, so why do you claim USA is the one who won the war and that countries have to feel "indebtedness" to it? You claim I am taught the wrong history when I have quoted sources to support my point here?
    1
  22301. The people of Taiwan need to realize that USA is only using ROC as a means to get back at China, and doesn't really care about ROC's interests. It is also highly unlikely that USA will move to defend ROC if PRC decides to reclaim Taiwan, since the same thing happened when Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine, but USA did nothing about it, except for imposing sanctions on Russia. Today, PRC and USA are big trading partners of each other, and its highly unlikely that USA will risk its relations with PRC for ROC's sake. USA's interests are ultimately its own.
    1
  22302.  Beast Mode  Can American workers even compete with the low wages of Chinese workers? If not, then the cost of Apple's iPhones is going to increase, further worsening the inflation problems that America is facing today. Decoupling from China will further exacerbate the cost of living in America, since they will no longer have access to affordable Chinese goods.
    1
  22303.  Beast Mode  I seem to remember Biden promising to help Ukraine if Russia invaded. Yet for all their promises, the U.S isn't sending troops to defend Ukraine. The people of Taiwan should learn from example of US with Ukraine, and would do well to know that USA doesn't care about Taiwan as long as they can use the island as a chess piece to contain the mainland's rise
    1
  22304.  Beast Mode  Biden isn't even willing to send American troops to fight for Ukraine, then what makes you think he will do so for Taiwan? Frankly speaking, many Americans are sick of war. The shambolic withdrawal of U.S troops from Kabul left many Americans shocked that the mighty U.S army lost a 20-year war in Afghanistan, against a bunch of insurgents (Taliban), and you think Americans want to go to war over Taiwan? Another thing is that when President Biden met with President Xi, he stated to Xi's face that the U.S respects the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China, so why is he suddenly going back on his words with his recent actions? It just shows that Biden is not a man of his word, he says one thing but does the opposite.
    1
  22305.  Beast Mode  Biden isn't even willing to send American troops to fight for Ukraine, then what makes you think he will do so for Taiwan? When President Biden met with President Xi, he stated to Xi's face that the U.S respects the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China, so why is he suddenly going back on his words with his recent actions? It just shows that Biden is not a man of his word, he says one thing but does the opposite.
    1
  22306.  Beast Mode  It's not that I'm trying to convince you, it's just that you're unwilling to hear out different viewpoints. Also, why are you accusing me of being 50 cents?
    1
  22307.  Beast Mode  Let me pose a simple question to you: Can the United States afford to fight a war on two fronts (i.e Ukraine and Taiwan Island) while battling rising inflation at home?
    1
  22308. Agreed. If those DPP separatists want to declare independence, they'll have to get out of the Chinese territory of Taiwan, and find some other plot of territory to call their own. Because the island belongs to China.
    1
  22309.  @zhugeliang3905  Agreed. Prior to Nixon's visit to China, the U.S did not recognize the PRC as China, they recognize ROC in Taiwan as China, so U.S placed embargoes on countries exporting food to China, such as Australia at that time. Not many Westerners seem to know about this bit of history.
    1
  22310.  @urdude67  There's a video on YouTube where the CEOs of Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple all testify in Congress about whether China steals US technology from their companies. The CEOs were asked whether they know of any instances where China stole technology from their companies. 3 of the 4 answered No and only Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook said Yes. So while I agree that there are instances where China may have infringed onto IP theft and that that is wrong, I believe that China has since tightened up rules on IP protection, and that there might be exaggeration of the accusations of IP theft by China.
    1
  22311.  @urdude67  Since you brought up the different time periods, then you should know that about 150 years ago, the United States copied much of United Kingdom's IP. Charles Dickens visited Boston in 1842 and when he stepped off the boat, he found the city's bookstores rife with pirated copies of his novels, along with those of his countrymen, so much that he made scathing lectures decrying the practice. for most of the 19th century the United States remained an outlaw in the world of international copyright. The nation's publishers merrily pirated books without permission, and without paying the authors or original publishers a dime. In one industry after another, 19th-century American producers churned out counterfeit products in remarkable quantities, slapping fake labels on locally made knockoffs of foreign ales, wines, gloves, and thread. As one expose at the time put it: "We have 'Paris hats' made in New York, 'London Gin' and 'London Porter' that never was in a ship's hold, 'Superfine French paper' made in Massachusetts." Americans also displayed a particular talent for counterfeiting currency. This was a time when individual banks, not the federal government, supplied the nation's paper money in a bewildering variety of so-called "bank notes." Counterfeiters flourished to the point that in 1862 one British writer, after counting close to 6,000 different species of counterfeit or fraudulent bills in circulation, could reasonably assure his readers that "in America, counterfeiting has long been practiced on a scale which to many will appear incredible." (The above paragrahs were excerpts from The Boston Globe article entitled: A nation of outlaws: A century ago, that wasn't China -- it was us) It just goes to show that there's a period of time when countries copied from one another, and that includes what the USA did to UK. But eventually countries developed IP protection laws as a way to deal with this.
    1
  22312.  @urdude67  About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    1
  22313.  @urdude67  I do firmly believe that capitalism is the root cause of the world's current problems, and I also believe China's leadership thinks the same way. Capitalism favors monopolies, just look at American monopolies like Apple, Google, Facebook and Amazon dominating their respective industries, having either eliminated or bought out the competition from smaller American firms, possibly even stifling innovation through competition. The Chinese government is aware of this, that's why they've implemented an anti-monopoly law, cracking down on anti-competitive practices on Chinese big tech firms like Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, and so on. This helps "free up space" in the market for smaller Chinese firms to emerge and compete. Innovation through competition can also take place, and in a sense, the crackdown against big tech while promoting smaller tech firms helps redistribute the wealth in society, whereas in the United States, much of the wealth remains concentrated in the rich 1%. In other words, in China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned corporations for China's benefit, reining in the corporations when they gone too far. Whereas in the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans. You said: "From what little I have seen, Chinese leadership are like a new aristocracy, out to enrich their families." Could you perhaps list some specific examples? From what I understand, President Xi Jinping has one of the world's lowest salaries for a world leader, around $22,000 a year. In fact, all members of China's Politburo Standing Committee will now earn the same base salary.
    1
  22314.  @urdude67  You said: "I think the ultimate flaw in communism is that it is totally wrong about human nature. Have you ever shared a kitchen with other people at work or in an apartment?" I could also say the same about capitalism what you did with communism. As for sharing a kitchen, many kitchen workers still do that in today's capitalistic society, just stroll into any fast-food restaurant. Furthermore, the worker's kitchen is not their own, because capitalism means that private owners control the means of production. This means that kitchen workers do not own their workplace, they merely work in it for a salary paid by some private owner, and they don't get to decide what to produce, who to produce to, what to do with the profits, and so on. Those decisions are made by the private owner, keeping the vast majority of profits for himself. If the kitchen was instead, a big corporation, than the private owner would be the board of directors that make all the decisions for the company, instead of the workers. Communism means that workers (the proletariat) control the means of production. That means the kitchen workers own their workplace. The workers make all the decisions, what to produce, who to produce to and what to do with the profits. They wouldn't give away their hard earned profits to some private owner now would they? Mostly likely, those important decisions would be put to a vote. And there actually exists these sort of "companies" where the workers themselves self-manage and these are known as worker cooperatives.
    1
  22315.  @urdude67  Look, you've previously mentioned that you're disappointed with the failed leadership of USA, and the failure of the American political structure and social contract. Have you perhaps considered that America's failure in these areas is because of capitalism itself? Thanks to capitalism, the rich U.S corporations now literally control the U.S government, and like all capitalists, they are driven to acquire profit above all else, even at the expense of ordinary Americans. Instead of being a democracy where the government is of the people, by the people, for the people, the United States has effectively become a plutocracy where the government is of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%. You're probably aware of this, given you've previously expressed that your ire is directed at the political and financial elites of USA. The top 1% would be the crooks at Wall Street, Hollywood, Big Pharma, etc, but perhaps none more obvious than the U.S Military Industrial Complex, waging wars in the Middle East for profit, and to control the oil, at the expense of ordinary Americans. To me, it's so obvious that capitalism is the source of the problems of the world today, it's become so deeply entrenched in today's society, that it's bad effects often go unnoticed by the people around.
    1
  22316.  @The5thBranch  But again, as of now, there is no PLA troop buildup in the Taiwan Strait (unlike the Russian troop buildup) so there is no evidence to suggest an imminent attack on Taiwan by President Xi Jinping. And the PLAAF fighters flew in international airspace, and did not violate Taiwan's airspace, only entered it's ADIZ (which isn't recognized internationally as Taiwan's own airspace). And PLAAF fighters flight path took them closer to the mainland than to Taiwan island.
    1
  22317.  @The5thBranch  I believe in facts, in actual evidence gleamed from the ground, such there being no buildup of PLA troops in the Taiwan Straits (unlike the Russian troop buildup) so there is no evidence to suggest an imminent attack on Taiwan by President Xi. You are welcome to present your evidence, and I listened to your claims of PLAAF fighters incursions, but those fighter planes were flying in international airspace and while they did enter Taiwan's ADIZ, that is not considered Taiwan airspace as the concept of an ADIZ is not defined in any international treaty and is not regulated by any international body. Besides, the flight path took the fighters closer to mainland China than to Taiwan Island. I believed I've argued my point fairly and with supporting evidence, however, it seems that your argument is based on speculation without proof.
    1
  22318.  @rebeccachan3405  Yes indeed. Mao Zedong could not import food from countries like Australia during the Great Chinese Famine, because of the U.S embargo. This is part of the U.S playbook that they are using even today by sanctioning other countries.
    1
  22319.  @Ken4JCML  About "disqualifying everyone who gets in China's way", The two Korean gold hopefuls were disqualified for making an illegal lane-change and the other for passing late illegally. The International Olympic Committee has reviewed the footage and that disqualifications still hold their ground, then how is China responsible for disqualifying anyone at all? It's the IOC that does so.
    1
  22320.  @Ken4JCML  The International Olympic Committee has reviewed the footage of Hungarian and American athletes and after a lengthy review, it was determined the Chinese team was impeded twice during the event. One review showed an opposing skater's arm impeding a Chinese skater, which is against the rules. Team USA skater Ryan Pivirotto was also penalized for impeding China after crossing the blue line early.
    1
  22321.  @High-Flow-Drainage-Solutions  I lost count of how of how many times I heard the same old stale excuse of "I'm not anti-China, I'm just anti-CPC" used by anti-China people to defend themselves and justify their anti-China stance. As for China being hostile? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, isn't it the United States that's a threat to global peace and stability here?
    1
  22322.  @High-Flow-Drainage-Solutions  China's so-called debt-trap diplomacy has long been debunked by experts. According to an article in The Alantic: The Chinese ‘Debt Trap’ Is a Myth (By Deborah Brautigam and Meg Rithmire) and the narrative wrongfully portrays both Beijing and the developing countries it deals with. According to the author's research the Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country, much less the port of Hambantota. According to an article by Lowy Institute: Debunking the myth of China’s “debt-trap diplomacy” in their report, recently published by Chatham House, Lee Jones and Shahar Hameiri argue that China’s “debt-trap diplomacy” is a myth. But it's very clear the U.S warmongering attitudes have contributed to severe instability in the Middle East, with the most recent being the Joe Biden's botched Afghanistan withdrawal, after spending nearly 20 years in Afghanistan and pouring trillions of dollars into the country, only the replace the Taliban with the Taliban, and even abandoning billions of dollars of U.S military equipment in Kabul for the Taliban to acquire, making them among the most well-armed groups today.
    1
  22323.  @High-Flow-Drainage-Solutions  You clearly said you hate the Communist Party of China, that means you hate Deng Xiaoping, Zhou Enlai, Li Wenliang, Jack Ma, Ren Zhengfei, and over 90 million communist members?
    1
  22324.  @eschwarz1003  But what makes such Americans think Chinese people are restricted? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everybody has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your lands and spending coin on your tourist industries. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese students, studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE are expanding overseas and Chinese investors are buying real estate in other countries. So what makes such Americans think Chinese are restricted? Chinese can be found all over the world, we make up about a fifth of humanity after all.
    1
  22325.  @eschwarz1003  Are you implying that somehow all 1.4 billion people of China share the exact same opinion?
    1
  22326.  @eschwarz1003  But many Chinese travel overseas and understand what the life is like outside, can you say the same about Americans? And China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. So if anything, doesn't it look like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here?
    1
  22327.  @eschwarz1003  Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors. Just ask the expats in China, many of them receive a warm welcome to our country. In fact, many expats' first impressions of China were vastly different from what Western MSM portrayed it out to be. Just search on YouTube "First Impressions of China" if you don't believe me. However, I wish I could say the same of Westerners. Many Westerners (but not all) are increasing regarding Chinese in their lands with suspicion, and treating Chinese in their lands as unwelcome and as potential spies.
    1
  22328.  @juanmakun7271  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. Under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Under Mao, life Expectancy at birth in China nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980, and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al.) Under Mao, infant mortality was halved, and illiteracy rates were nearly halved. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%. China’s literacy success has been described as “perhaps the single greatest educational effort in human history” (Peterson, 1997). Chairman Mao has done much good for China, but he's poorly understood among Westerners because of Western demonization of communist ideology.
    1
  22329.  @juanmakun7271  You said Chairman Mao created a monster called Kim Il Sung, but this is clearly untrue. North Korean leader Kim Il Sung was installed into power by the Soviet Union, not by Mao. North Korea was founded in 1948, with Kim as the Soviet-designated premier, while the People's Republic of China was founded on 1949 (1 year later), so how could Mao have created Kim Il-Sung? China supported North Korea because N. Korea is one of our closet allies at that time under Kim Il-Sung, and North Korea helped the communists in China win control over mainland China and found the People's Republic of China in 1949, so why can't China continue to support our ally North Korea? I mean, every country has strategic alliances, look at the United States supporting the authoritarian Saudi Arabian monarchy with their poor human rights record (especially towards women) and USA just closes a blind eye to Saudi Arabia because of the oil.
    1
  22330.  @juanmakun7271  So what do people in Taiwan island, USA and other countries base their predictions of Xi's intentions of? We do know however that there is currently no buildup of PLA troops at the Taiwan Strait (unlike Russia's buildup in its border with Ukraine) so there is no evidence to suggest an impending attack on Taiwan by President Xi. In fact, Xi has publicly vowed for the peaceful reunification with Taiwan, as he's consistently stated. Also if you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it states that Taiwan is part of China, and since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, that means Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Even the United States recognize Taiwan is part of China ever since the 1972 Shanghai Communique. On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia. ... The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position. ... (Taken from The Diplomat: The Shanghai Communique: An American Foreign Policy Success, 45 Years Later) Also North Korean and South Korea were historically a single unified country Korea, under the Joseon Dynasty, until the Japanese invade and occupied Korea for 35 years. After Japanese WWII surrender, Korea was (needlessly) divided into North Korea (Soviet Union) and South Korea (United States). North Korea wanted to end this humiliating division of Korea and they almost succeeded (90% unified) until the US choose to declare war against North Korea and intervene in this internal Civil War in Korea, and the U.S pushed the North Koreans pass the 38th Parallel (Line of Division) and into actual North Korean territory, right up to China's doorstep (near Liaoning province) so China had no choice but to join North Korea and push the U.S forces back.
    1
  22331.  @thelaw2174  "神州 Shenzhou Unifying China with 100 million deaths." That was during Chinese Civil War, of course Chinese were killing Chinese. Just like during the American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans. Or Vietnamese killing Vietnamese during Vietnam War. Or Koreans during Korean War or any civil war for that matter. But it's thanks to Chairman Mao that the killing finally ended when Mao succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country under the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949). You've gotta give Mao credit for bringing an end to the killing, else if not for him, China would still be a weak, divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  22332.  @davidkusanagi589  You said: "Your government also killed over hundreds of millions of your own people during the cultural revolution." Killed over hundreds of millions? During the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976)? According to Population Pyramid: China, China's population in 1965 was 724,218,970, and by 1975, China's population actually grown to 926,240,888, having increased by 202,021,918 in 10 years during the Cultural Revolution period. Population of China from 1960 to 1980 1960: 660,408,054 1965: 724,218,970 } Cultural Revolution Period 1970: 827,601,385 } Cultural Revolution Period 1975: 926,240,888 } Cultural Revolution Period 1980: 1,000,089,228 ... Source: Population Pyramid: China So you're saying that during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), China's population decreased by at least 100s of million, yet from 1965 - 1975, the data shows China's population actually increased by a further 202 million? Then where did you get your claim that the government killed over hundreds of millions of people during the Cultural Revolution?
    1
  22333.  @davidkusanagi589  Let's get this straight, you specifically singled out the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976) where allegedly hundreds of millions of Chinese were killed, now why are you suddenly moving the goalpost to encompass the Chinese Civil War (1927-1949) and the One Child Policy (1980-2015)? I've shown that China's population actually increased from 1965-1975 by 202 million, yet you're claiming that during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976) that at least 100s of millions of people were killed?
    1
  22334.  @arkyologist  What ongoing genocide are you talking about? The USA killing Muslims in the Middle East I presume?
    1
  22335.  @davidkusanagi589  I often heard this same old stake excuse being toted around by people, claiming "I'm not anti-China, I'm just anti-CPC" to defend themselves and justify their anti-China stance. But the matter of fact is that studies have shown that majority of the people of China support the Communist Party of China. Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past. Over 70 years ago, literally nobody thought "communist" China would succeed, or grow powerful and play a role in global politics. Yet fast forward till today and look at how far China has come under the Communist Party of China. China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. China's political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) yet people like you openly advocate for Chinese people to overthrow our government? Also, why are you changing the point? Earlier you specifically singled out the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976) where allegedly hundreds of millions of Chinese were killed, now why are you suddenly moving the goalpost to encompass the Chinese Civil War (1927-1949) and the One Child Policy (1980-2015)? I've shown that China's population actually increased from 1965-1975 by 202 million, yet you're claiming that during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976) that at least 100s of millions of people were killed? China's population actually grew during the Cultural Revolution, so where's your evidence that hundreds of millions of people were killed during the Cultural Revolution? When China's population actually grew by 200 million from 1965-1975?
    1
  22336.  @long9x97  China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Look at the difference between China's handling of Covid-19 compared to the USA. China has 20% of the world's population, but only around 107,000 cases of Covid-19. Whereas the United States has 4% of the world's population yet has over 80 million Covid-19 cases. If anything, those deaths were caused by your country's government neglect, while China has been sharing what we know about the coronavirus to the WHO and the information is accessible to the West.
    1
  22337.  @long9x97  "神州 Shenzhou you said big companies like Apple, Amazond dominance in the market but do you know Huawei aka CPP's company" Huawei is 100% employee-owned by 96,000 current and former staff, leaving exactly 0% in the hands of the government. Huawei does get some government subsidies, for doing R&D, but the amount is negligible compared to Huawei's revenue from sales. Huawei does get tax breaks but the percentage is comparable to most tech companies in the USA like GM, Intel, Pfizer, Boeing, etc. Source: YouTube Video: Fact: Huawei isn't built on Chinese state funding
    1
  22338.  @long9x97  You said: "but do you know Huawei aka CPP's company steal the technology from Apple and Microsoft?" The four CEOs of Amazon, Google, Facebook and Apple have all testified in U.S Congress via videoconference for the congressional antitrust hearing on July 29, 2020, and there were asked whether they know of any instances where China stole technology from their companies. 3 of the 4 answered No, only Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook said yes. Yet why do you claim Huawei stole technology from Apple, given that Apple CEO Tim Cook has testified in U.S Congress that China did not steal technology from the company? Source: YouTube Video: SCMP Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple respond to Congress about whether China steals US technology
    1
  22339.  @davidkusanagi589  "神州 Shenzhou Stupid people don't know they are stupid.. oh the irony." I guess you must be referring to yourself when you said that.
    1
  22340. ​ @davidkusanagi589  Your first comment here was (and I quote your words) _" Your government also killed over hundreds of millions of your own people during the cultural revolution."_ So while you're claiming that China's population decreased by at least 100s of millions during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but I've previously shown that from 1965 - 1975, the data shows China's population actually increased by a further 202 million. But you're unable to refute this point, so suddenly you've expanded the time range, literally shifting the goalpost after I've scored a goal in it, then aren't you quoting yourself when you said "stupid people don't know they are stupid"?
    1
  22341.  @samurai_garena  Yes, some people do that, but obviously not everyone. I hope more people choose logic and reasoning over prejudice, and it's better to attack my points instead of attacking me personally for my views.
    1
  22342.  @quekjoseph836  The USA send warships to with 12 nautical miles of the Paracel Islands in the South China Sea, which is intruding on Chinese territorial waters. For example, in 2017, the USS Stethem, a guided-missile destroyer, sailed within 12 nautical miles of Triton Island, part of the Paracel Islands in the South China Sea. Source: Reuters: U.S. warship sails near disputed island in South China Sea reuters.com/article/us-usa-southchinasea-navy-idUSKBN19N0O0 In 2016, the USS Curtis Wilbur a guided missile destroyer, sailed within 12 NM near Triton Island in the Paracel Islands. Source: US warship sails by island claimed by China: Pentagon yahoo.com/us-warship-sailed-waters-off-island-claimed-china-005832507.html As far as I know, Thailand and Singapore do not claim any of the South China Sea Islands, why did you bring those countries into the discussion?
    1
  22343.  @scottlarson535  Canada was the one who took up the US request for extradition. A total of 111 countries have signed extradition treaties with the U.S., and dozens among them received extradition requests, but none of them followed this ridiculous idea, until Meng entered Canada. From September to December 2018, Meng traveled to France, Britain, Ireland, Poland, Singapore, Japan and Belgium. All 7 countries have a bilateral agreement on extradition with the U.S. yet Canada was the only one that helped the U.S. government in this kind of dirty game.
    1
  22344. China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land, and still produce surplus to export to other countries. We have the world's largest pig farms and sheep farms. Our fishing industry makes up 2/3 of the world's fishing and our fish farms make up 1/3 of the world's total aquaculture. China ranks 1st in agricultural output, producing rice, wheat, potatoes, eggs, honey, tea, tobacco, etc. so why would China starve?
    1
  22345.  @bigboss337  In 1971, the UN democratically voted to legitimatize the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and de-legitimatize the Republic of China 🇹🇼. Resolution 2758 was passed in response to Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The voting results were: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained ... Since PRC won the vote with two-thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971 and recognized the People's Republic of China as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" from the UN.
    1
  22346. Never look a gift horse in the mouth... unless it's a Trojan Horse.
    1
  22347. It's apparent that the Nancy's visit is not to the island's benefit. Hopefully this visit would wake up more people in Taiwan to the realization that the U.S is only interested in pawns to contain China that's all.
    1
  22348.  @hmong_keeb_kwm  It is estimated that 1 in every 200 men on the planet has Mongolian leader, Genghis Khan DNA, which is testament to the fecundity of the Mongols. So aren't the Mongols the ones who "completely rape everyone to destruction"? Source: 1 in 200 men direct descendants of Genghis Khan discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/1-in-200-men-direct-descendants-of-genghis-khan
    1
  22349.  @hmong_keeb_kwm  The Qing Dynasty is Manchurian Dynasty not Han Chinese Dynasty. Han Chinese did not ask to be conquered by Mongolians nor Manchurians. You think only s**t happens to your people and not to Han Chinese?
    1
  22350.  @hmong_keeb_kwm  Han Chinese weren't nearly as expansionist as the Mongolians and Manchurians, instead of conquest, we tend to prefer peaceful pursuits like crafting silk clothing (Hanfu 汉服) creating porcelain (fine china) works of art, and developing Chinese characters (Hanzi 汉字), calligraphy and poetry. Video: [Sinosphere] China, Japan, Korea, Vietnam Traditional Dresses - Beauties Of Asia youtu.be/Oa3F5N8r_QU Just compare Maps of Han Chinese dynasties, like Song Dynasty and Ming Dynasty, with Maps of Mongolian Yuan Dynasty and Manchurian Qing Dynasty for example, and while Han aren't entirely expansionist, Han maps weren't as expansive as those by Mongols and Manchus.
    1
  22351.  @jiaolong01  China has 5000 years of history, long before the Birth of Jesus Christ and Christianity. Ancient Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought.
    1
  22352.  @jiaolong01  Chinese invented paper and paper inventions like lanterns, paper umbrellas and paper banknote (which made business transactions easier since merchants need not carry around lots of metal coinage and precious stones) and even toilet paper (which was hoarded throughout the world). Mankind's earliest aviation invention was in the form of paper kite, and even hot air balloons were invented in China, and were known as Sky Lanterns (天灯) or Kongming Lanterns (孔明灯) Here is beautiful video of RISE Lantern Festival in Las Vegas, celebrated with Chinese Sky Lanterns. Video: youtu.be/SNtwlBbBdb4?t=10 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  22353.  @hmong_keeb_kwm  About pollution in China, China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/b8cCsUBYSkw This makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity, some 856.4 billion kilowatt hours a year – more than double the amount produced by Brazil, in second place. The top three is completed by Canada, which produces 376.7 billion kilowatt hours a year. Source: China produces the most electricity from hydroelectric power weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/
    1
  22354.  @hmong_keeb_kwm  About Deforestation in China, the government has massive reforestation initiatives to help green the Earth. For example, the world's largest artificial forest is Saihanba National Forest Park (塞罕坝国家森林公园) located in China. Video: Saihanba, the world's largest man-made forest youtu.be/o5xdIVvFEeo Video: Two generations spent 55 years building world's largest man-made forest in Saihanba, N. China youtu.be/3RqsUD6fyGk
    1
  22355. Tibetans also enjoys special exemptions from paying taxes to government and health care and education bursaries. For example, if Han Chinese need 500 points to qualify for university course, Tibetan only need say 300 points (easier) to qualify same course. Also, when Tibetans get married and start family, they are exempted from One-Child Policy, unlike Han Chinese, and can have as many kids as they want. Because of this, Tibetan population has grown significantly during last few years and Tibet population has doubled in size since 1951.
    1
  22356. jtpf87 Lol Tibetans aren't allowed to travel? I assume you got your false information from some biased Western sources in the first place. Who says Tibetans can't travel out of China? Many Tibetan pilgrims visit the 14th Dalai Lama in India so what rubbish are you even making up here? Also there isn't a "Republic of Taiwan" only a Republic of China so again what rubbish are you making up here?
    1
  22357. +jtpf87 Out of these 10000 Tibetan "refugees" about 40,000-50,000 of them returned to Tibet after a pilgrimage in India. The application for Tibetan passport is more stricter than for Han Chinese, which is why some passports fail to get issued because of Tibetan background involvement. Nevertheless, Tibetans still travel to other Asian countries like Japan and Korea so since when are Tibetans barred from traveling outside of China? It all depends on the Tibetan's background information and other factors that's all.
    1
  22358. There are even Tibetan students who travel abroad to study in overseas schools USA and Japan, so who says Tibetans are not allowed to leave Tibet? As for 9 dash line, nobody protest Chinese proclamation of South China Sea islands back in 1947. North Vietnam had accepted that Spratly Islands were historically Chinese. When Philippines gain independence, they did not drawn Scarborough shoal or other territory as within their national boundaries. Even US president Franklin sent warships to help China reclaim South China Sea Islands. But in 1970s, Vietnam and Philippines began encroach into China's territory, so why are these countries suddenly in the right? Why didn't Vietnam or Philippines protest back in 1947 when the map was first published?
    1
  22359. jtpf87 Who is ignoring most of the facts? You said "Tibetans aren't allowed leave Tibet and travel" and I already shown you that Tibetans traveled on pilgrimage to India, as well as to countries like USA and Japan for studies so how am I picking and choosing? If China made claim to South China Sea Islands back in 1947, and nobody objected, then exactly what is China doing wrong here? In 1999, Philippines ran aground one of its rusting WW2 vessels onto Spratly Islands and secretly removed all Chinese markers from that islands. Chinese government protested and offered to tow away the rusting vessel but Philippines government refused any help. Instead, they are continuing to reinforce the rusting hull to prevent it disintegrating in order to lay claim to the island. So exactly who is resorting to dirty tricks here? The islands were not part of Philippines when it drew its national boundaries at independence. Who says Youtube is not approved by the government? CGTN and other Chinese News Network make use of Youtube too, isn't it? As for VPN, so many foreign companies come to China and require Western Internet to function, so who says having VPN for business is illegal?
    1
  22360. To each his own. I personally love the long streams by Brian. There's just so much information to unpack regarding the geopolitical situation, so much such that a short video feels very rushed in comparison.
    1
  22361. "Chinese economy is centrally planned" The world economy is uncertain and always in flux, shifting and flowing rapidly according to various economic forces, and can be best compared to an wild, untamed river. Would anyone just let the river flow uncontrollably and cause widespread damage? That's what Westerner's "free trade" policy is doing, flooding their markets with Chinese goods and enabling corporations to leave to seek opportunities in China and other countries. But China's approach is different. The government is "taming the river" and controlling it to best suit China's economy. For example, our local companies will die if exposed directly to world competition, so the government "shields" them and let them grow up in safety, at least until they are strong enough to stand on their own two feet. Huawei is one example of a local Chinese brand that is slowly gaining recognition worldwide. Isn't this a better approach instead?
    1
  22362. +Wanton Entanglement Why are you accusing me of such?
    1
  22363. +Wanton Entanglement So you are accusing me of such, because its the simplest thing to do so?
    1
  22364. Is that really German, or are you seemingly poking fun at their language?
    1
  22365.  @relaxwhc  But why'd you specifically choose those German words as if to make fun of them?
    1
  22366.  @relaxwhc  I mean, what's the point of putting those German words here? Are you perhaps making fun of their length or something?
    1
  22367.  @relaxwhc  What has bananas tasting good even got to do with this?
    1
  22368.  @zackk4393  Synopsis: The story was inspired from a fiction entitled “Diary of a madman” written by Nikolai Gogol in 1834. As the title suggests, the story outlines a diary written by a madman. The allegory was conveyed by a first-person narrator. source:wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Madman%27s_Diary#Synopsis
    1
  22369.  @gavins9846  Peng Shuai is clearly well, she attended small parties with a small gathering and she has appeared in video call with IOC. She's clearly trying to keep a low profile after her previous relationship with a much older man has been revealed, so that's why she's been avoiding the public eye for weeks. But organizations like WTA and EU are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see, instead of respecting her wishes for personal privacy.
    1
  22370.  @gavins9846  "神州 Shenzhou Shame was her last priority when she made those allegations on sexual assault," Could you point to where she made those allegations of sexual assault? Peng Shuai wrote an email to WTA that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    1
  22371.  @surp99  Why would I want ice-cream?
    1
  22372.  @surp99  What do you know about the social credit system? In the past, many foreigners often complain Chinese people spit in public, smoke in non-smoking areas, jump queues, disobey traffic rules, jay walk, drive on wrong side of the road, speed through red lights, etc when not all Chinese people are like that. We Chinese feel embarrassed that such bad people represent China overseas, so the government is designing a social credit system to discourage such bad behaviour and promote better behaviour instead. If successful, this will be meritocratic system where good behaviour is rewarded and bad behaviour penalised. But if such people persist with bad behaviour, until their scores fall to become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisances of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again.
    1
  22373.  @surp99  "There is a good amount of Chinese who are mostly older that are supportive of the CCP. While the young generation are usually distateful of the CCP." According to a long term Harvard University and Ash Center study, it has been revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. "Still, most of the Malaysian Singaporean chinese don't really like mainlander Chinese not because of the CCP but cause of behaviour." I have met some Singaporean Chinese tourist before and they used to exhibit bad behavior, such as complaining about delays and looking down on Chinese mainlanders as inferior. But obviously not all of them behave like that. "I mean you mentioned that the social credit system is used in China to make sure people are behaving properly and a lot of media in China keeps blabbering about it as some sort of wizardly magical potion that makes wonders but clearly it's not working properly." The Social Credit System is certainly not a cure-all, if that's what you're saying, but it has certainly helped by making sure socially irresponsible Chinese are barred from purchasing plane tickets and making a nuisance of themselves overseas. This is one possible solution to the problem, but education remains of utmost importance.
    1
  22374.  @surp99  You said: "I thought they were working class citizens from China but apparently they were from a prestigious university in China." What's the name of this prestigious university in China that those Chinese tourists are from? "While Singapore/Malaysia is open to cultural influences from the East and the West, its Chinese culture is unlike that of China. The three countries do not mirror each other culturally and China’s ability to transplant the Singapore/Malaysian experience is therefore not predicated on cultural elements." I disagree. I've seen some examples of Singapore/Malaysia Chinese tourist who exhibit bad behavior before, such as complaining about delays, stealing hotel soap and shampoo, taking away food from the buffet counter, and other unsavory behavior. I am aware mainland Chinese tourists also exhibit such behavior, this is typical of tourists from a poor starving country (like Singapore was in the past) but with development comes better tourist behaviors. "Most Mainland Chinese feel that the overseas Chinese community are merely “separated” from their China motherland. They believe the overseas Chinese continue to feel for China and have an urge to return, that these are “emigrants” who harbour a longing for home." This viewpoint is not only shared by some mainland Chinese, but even some of the indigenous people of Malaysia feel the same why. I mean, just look at former Malaysian PM Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, he remarked that Chinese Malaysian eat with chopsticks, not with their hands like the "Malaysian way". This is the gist of what Dr Mahathir said: "The Chinese eat with chopsticks, they don’t eat with their hands. They have not adopted the Malaysian way of eating food. They retained the chopstick, which is an identity from China, not Malaysia, and many other things" - Former Malaysian PM Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. I mean, lets get this straight, China does not force the Chinese in Malaysia/Singapore to follow Chinese culture, they choose to do so of their own accord, then how can you blame Chinese mainlanders for having this view?
    1
  22375.  @surp99  "神州 Shenzhou You really think Mahathir is loved by everyone in Malaysia? Hell he's a laughing stock in Malaysia anyway so most of the minorities in Malaysia including myself are siding with the Chinese and felt the comment was kinda bizzare." He's the former Prime Minister of Malaysia for crying out loud, and since Malaysia is a democracy, that means he was elected into power by majority of votes by the people of Malaysia, then can't I quote his remarks? You're part of the minority, but in a Western-style democracy, the majority matters isn't it? That means majority of Dr Mahathir do share the same sentiments when he claimed Chinese eat with chopsticks, not with hands like the Malaysian way. And again, China never point a gun at Chinese Malaysians/Singaporeans and force them to use chopsticks or adopt Chinese culture, they choose to do so of their own accord, then how is mainland Chinese to blame for this perception? If you think Chinese Malaysians/Singaporeans experience is not predicated on cultural elements, then don't borrow such cultural elements from China then. Also, you mentioned a story about Chinese tourists supposedly being from a prestigious university in China, then what's the name of this prestigious university? Since you said it's prestigious then I should be able to know which university in China you are referring to.
    1
  22376.  @surp99  "Hell, do you honestly think most of the Chinese citizen supports the government" Why is it inconceivable to you that majority of Chinese citizens support the government in China? Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made-in-China) having world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. As long as the CPC is able to deliver economic growth for China, why is it unfathomable to you that majority of the people of China support the CPC? "especially with the case of Peng Shuai. Since she said that the sexual assault wasn't true, isn't that defamation or false accusation? That's a serious crime right there. But I don't see any punishment of any sort going her way? Why is that?" I read Peng Shuai's original post (you can find the translated version on Reddit) and she has had a rocky, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, an affair that spanned several years, and while she was emotional in her post, I do not see any allegations of sexual assault, so what punishment is there to mete out to Peng Shuai? ... Also, since you brought up your experience with those Chinese tourists who were from a prestigious university in China, then what's the name of this university in China? I should be able to know the university you are referring to, if it is prestigious.
    1
  22377.  @surp99  "神州 Shenzhou this was a long time ago so around mid 2019 and it had a like red whitish logo that looks like a tree or somethin but either it's Peking" Where was this logo located? Is it possible that some people just acquired Peking University branded clothing but not that they'd actually been to Peking University itself? "I doubt you or I will find anything as this was an isolated incident and not really mentioned in the media anyways." If you claim it's an isolated incident, then there's no way to verify whether your story is the truth. It's just anecdotal evidence after all. The thing is that from my experience, I find many overseas Chinese from Malaysia and Singapore tend to (generally) look down on Chinese mainlanders. But Singapore and Malaysia Chinese were once poor immigrants themselves, they worked hard to succeed, but when Chinese mainlander does the same, they still look down on us. "The thing I don't understand is why Peng Shuai isn't punished. Even if she didn't specify she wasn't sexualy assaulted, she clearly posted that as an ulterior motive to make him look bad." Maybe she was already secretly punished behind the scenes. Maybe she realized her mistake and took down the post, and she made a private apology of some sort. Whatever it is, to me this is their own internal affair, it's not my place (or any third party) to tell them how to resolve this issue. The problem arises when the 2022 Beijing Olympics is just round the corner, and the WTA is trying to policitise the issue in order to possibly get more countries to consider boycotting the Olympics in Beijing. "I don't even know how she manages to act like nothing is going on." Right now, I think Peng Shuai is emotional after her outburst through her post, and frankly speaking, she should take some time off to sort out her personal affairs, lay low for a while until this all eventually blows over. Sports is important yes, but mental health and well-being is more important for her.
    1
  22378.  @surp99  You're an Indian Malaysian right? I find that back when China was a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, many overseas Chinese in Malaysia/Singapore feel ashamed of their homeland's weakness, and especially overseas Chinese in USA, UK, Canada, Australia, and other Western countries, they feel very ashamed when China is weak, so they support the Western anti-China narrative. But now that China has gotten much better, some overseas Chinese are beginning to feel proud of their homeland's rise, but many still vehemently deny their connections to their homeland. I wonder if this is the same for Indian Malaysians like you, that they feel some sort of shame for India's current status that they want little to do with their homeland and more to do with their host country like Malaysia in your case.
    1
  22379.  @rx228  "神州 Shenzhou You are very well spoken for a CCP shill. How much are you getting paid per post here? Must be hard trying to defend and justify rape." What makes you claim I'm a communist party shill without any proof whatsoever? And you mentioned rape but where's your evidence of rape? I've read Peng Shuai's post (you can find the translated version on Reddit) and while she has had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several years and she was very emotional in her post, but where are the allegations of sexual assault in her post? On 17 November, Peng Shuai even wrote an email to WTA, stating that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    1
  22380.  @rx228  "神州 Shenzhou Oh what a quick and convenient response. Almost like it's your full time job lmao." I happen to be free at the moment, then is there a problem that I could formulate a response to you? "How you you know that email wasnt written by Xi daddy himself? how can you be so sure that she didn't write that email under duress." Do you have evidence that email was written by President Xi Jinping? Or that it was written while she was under duress? ... Also, did you read Peng Shuai's post (you can find the translated version on Reddit)? Where are the allegations of sexual assault in her post? Since there are no allegations of sexual assault in Peng Shuai's post, then it appears that this email substantiates the claim that the allegations are not true, it has been twisted by WTA into allegations of sexual assault, based on unverified information.
    1
  22381.  @xXyasabeXx  You wrote: "Not true, just ask the countries who they’re doing business with now ." You've literally provided the answer yourself. Countries ARE doing business with China now because it is mutually beneficial for them to continue to do so. I mean, who'd want to continue doing a losing business? China is the largest business partner of many countries, whereas it's Trump's America that's slapping tariffs on their business partners.
    1
  22382.  @AlexanderTheGreat-f5r  Wow. Six months ago really? And here I've often been told by people that I comment too much.
    1
  22383.  @columbiaforte876  Where are all the Chineses Peoples at? Why in China of course. A whopping 1.4 billion people.
    1
  22384. China invented paper money and the rest of the world adopted it. Eventually they will do the same with digital currency.
    1
  22385. The world followed China with paper money. Eventually they will do so with digital currency as well.
    1
  22386. It should be "on" the right side, not "in" the right side.
    1
  22387.  Timothy Chung  No, you can be "in" the right, yes, but when talking about sides, you are either "on" one side or the other. How can someone be "in" the right side? They should be "on" the right side.
    1
  22388.  @wlakongpake  Republic of China's 11-Dash Line was published in 1947. Philippines boundaries are drawn up in the 1898 Treaty of Paris and it DOES NOT include the South China Sea Islands as part of Philippines territory. (Source: Wikipedia: File: Ph boundary in Treaty of Paris 1898)
    1
  22389.  @wlakongpake  Even the United States recognised the 11-Dash Line after it was published in 1947. In fact, the US Navy granted the USS Decker to the Chinese navy to help liberate the South China Sea Islands from Japanese occupation and this ship was renamed ROCS Taiping. One of the South China Sea Islands was renamed Taiping Island in honor of this ship.
    1
  22390.  @dextercadelina7953  Philippines intentionally ran aground a vessel onto the Second Thomas Shoal. China offered to help repair the vessel so that it can enter the sea, but Philippines refused. In 1999, president Joseph Estrada promised that the vessel would be towed away. In 2014, the Chinese government asked the Philippines to remove the grounded ship. In 2017, China and the Philippines established a gentlemen's agreement that the status quo be maintained for the South China Sea, as both sides tried to strengthen their relations. Under the status quo agreement, no construction materials are allowed to fortify the Sierra Madre. But Philippines kept sending supply ships to reinforce the rusting hull of the grounded vessel, in order to stake a claim to the shoal.
    1
  22391.  @alucard6675  "pag asa island even before you claiming that is your own..people living there." There are historical records of the island having been inhabited, at various times in history, by fishermen from Champa in present-day Vietnam and the Chinese, and during WWII by French Indochina and Imperial Japanese troops. After Japan's surrender, the island was returned to the _Republic of China as Chinese officials embarked to recover the island from the Japanese. China's Ministry of the Interior re-erected national markers on the major islands, drew up detailed maps of them, renamed them, and published the Location Map of the South China Sea Island. In May 1956, Tomás Cloma, a Philippine national, landed on several of the islands, claiming that he had discovered them and enjoyed the rights associated with discovery-occupation. The ROC ambassador to the Philippines immediately issued a statement stressing that the islands were ROC territory, and sent a letter of protest to Philippine Vice President and Foreign Secretary Carlos Polestico Garcia. Later, because of a strong typhoon, the islands Chinese inhabitants withdrew and the Philippines saw this empty space and organized the troops to land on the island on 29 July and renamed the island "Pag-asa Island".
    1
  22392.  @TacticalMayo  Why would you want to send your soldiers to go fight in China? Shouldn't American soldiers be defending American soil?
    1
  22393.  @TacticalMayo  Why would you want to send your soldiers to go fight in China?
    1
  22394.  GEO NEO  Didn't you say earlier that "no the United States doesn't care about the Olympics"? Why are you bragging about it now?
    1
  22395.  GEO NEO  So USA did not win against a technologically inferior, yet numerically superior People's Liberation Army, then what makes you think USA will win against an increasingly modern and technologically advanced (and just as numerous) PLA today? USA couldn't defeat China during Korean War when China's military was still rather backward, what makes you think USA stands a chance today with the modern PLA?
    1
  22396.  @MarkYeung1  Many Indians (but not all) still suffer from a "colonial mentality", worshiping Anglo-Saxon culture while harboring a disdain for any non-white culture (sometimes including their own). If Indians learn to "decolonize their mind", they can start healing the damage that the colonizer inflicts on the minds of the colonized. Only by breaking these mental chains, can Indians truly be free to walk their own path.
    1
  22397.  @yuanfangli9272  You said: "Huawei is an enterprise of the Chinese Communist Party. It has an improper competitive advantage among all Chinese enterprises because of Huawei’s military background." Huawei is 100% employee owned by 96,000 current and former staff, leaving exactly 0% in the hands of the Chinese government. Huawei does get government subsidies for doing R&D, but that amount is negligible compared to Huawei's revenue from sales. Huawei does get corporate tax breaks, but its comparable to the tax breaks that many American companies like G.M, Intel, Pfizer, Boeing, etc. Video: Fact: Huawei isn't built on Chinese state funding youtu.be/HAffWwL1E-Q
    1
  22398.  @KabzieMusic  But why can't China become powerful? If our country can someday match the United States as a superpower, then why can't China strive to achieve this goal? Nobody says that the West has to be in power over the world all the time.
    1
  22399.  @richardmorris9366  China's navy, the People's Liberation Army Navy and our Airforce, the People's Liberation Army Air Force are the largest in Asia.
    1
  22400.  @KabzieMusic  But how exactly did China break the Sino-British declaration in 1997? Hong Kong currently has their own government, separated from the communist party so could you explain how is China breaking that agreement after only 22 years?
    1
  22401.  MarktheSpark  " Corruption should always be monitored. " Agreed. Corruption is universal problem and virtually every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. At least under President Xi Jinping there are ongoing anti-corruption campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But USA hasn't had an anti-corruption crackdown of its own for some time. In my opinion, Hilary Clinton is corrupt politician, and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his presidential campaign. But after Trump became president, not further action has been taken against Clinton so far.
    1
  22402.  @hectoOut  "On the other hand Chinese immigrants move to America and would be treated as fair and equal." There is a rise in anti-Asian hate crimes in the United States. A total of *10,905 hate incidents were reported between March 19, 2020, and the end of December 2021, according to an advocacy group, Stop AAPI (Asian American Pacific Islander) Hate. Almost 40% more incidents had occurred in 2021 than in the roughly nine-month period of 2020. More than 60% of incidents were reported by women. About 67% of incidents involved harassment, around 16% involved physical assault, and roughly 16% involved avoidance or shunning. Chinese Americans were targeted in nearly 43% of incidents reported -- more than any other Asian ethnicity. Source: Stop AAPI Hate
    1
  22403.  @hectoOut  "On the other hand Chinese immigrants move to America and would be treated as fair and equal." A total of *10,905 hate incidents were reported between March 19, 2020, and the end of December 2021, according to an advocacy group, Stop AAPI (Asian American Pacific Islander) Hate. Almost 40% more incidents had occurred in 2021 than in the roughly nine-month period of 2020. More than 60% of incidents were reported by women. About 67% of incidents involved harassment, around 16% involved physical assault, and roughly 16% involved avoidance or shunning. Chinese Americans were targeted in nearly 43% of incidents reported -- more than any other Asian ethnicity.
    1
  22404.  @hectoOut  A total of *10,905 hate incidents were reported between March 19, 2020, and the end of December 2021, according to an advocacy group, Stop AAPI (Asian American Pacific Islander) Hate. Almost 40% more incidents had occurred in 2021 than in the roughly nine-month period of 2020. More than 60% of incidents were reported by women. About 67% of incidents involved harassment, around 16% involved physical assault, and roughly 16% involved avoidance or shunning. Chinese Americans were targeted in nearly 43% of incidents reported -- more than any other Asian ethnicity.
    1
  22405.  @hectoOut  Many developing countries simply lack the workers and engineers necessary for such extensive infrastructure projects, so Chinese workers and engineers are filling up the need, while the developing countries train more engineers themselves. Once the country has sufficient infrastructure expertise themselves, their local workers and engineers can start taking over jobs by Chinese workers in the future. Ultimately, these infrastructures like roads, railways, highways, bridges, etc will be in the developing countries themselves, so they do stand to gain from these projects in the future. You said: "You don't see Japanese project mass export of Japanese workers." Yes, because Japanese workers salaries aren't cheap. Whereas many Chinese workers still have low wages, although recently, Chinese wages are beginning to rise.
    1
  22406. +Harry China is exhibiting global influence politically on other countries. For example, even US President Trump recognized that Taiwan is part of China, under the One-China Policy, after a phonecall from Beijing. Even other world leaders today, like Russian President Vladimir Putin, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, British PM Theresa May, Indian PM Narendra Modi, etc, accept the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  22407. Same with Biden calling President Xi a dictator.
    1
  22408. Just like Joe calling President Xi a dictator.
    1
  22409. USA seems to be mired in political stagnation for long time. In my opinion, if making changes to the constitution benefits the country, then there's nothing wrong with doing so. USA has loose gun laws, which resulted in mass school shootings, but so far no amendment been made to introduce stricter gun laws, because Americans refuse to surrender their right to bear firearms.
    1
  22410.  @parnamsaini4751  I'm not the one crying, you should tell that to the other guy.
    1
  22411.  @namelesssnitchy Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of all the territory Taiwan claims (Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg )
    1
  22412.  @abbotsful  Take mobile phone payments for example, in China you can do many things with a single app, WeChat, such as pay money, book dental appointments, book karaoke sessions, book taxis, pay the fare, pay bills, split the bill (Going Dutch), transfer money, buy wine, order water, catch up on reading, pick up laundry, and so much more. Source: The amazing ways WeChat is used in China techinasia.com/how-wechat-is-really-used-in-china This technology is not as widespread in other countries as it is in China.
    1
  22413.  @abbotsful  Huawei is developing their own Harmony OS in response to bans by the USA. Video: HarmonyOS & New Products Launch - Highlights youtu.be/TBho5yekskE Trump's tariffs and sanctions are an attempt to stifle China's progress, however the good news is that they also act as a catalyst to the kick-start China's domestic technological self-sufficiency.
    1
  22414.  @abbotsful  Why can't I bring up China's achievements? China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours.
    1
  22415.  @abbotsful  You said: "you can bring up China's achievements if you like." Don't mind if I do. In 2002, China had 0 km hi-speed rail track, but in 2019, China has over 38,207 km of high-speed railway track, (more than double the rest of the world combined!) Video: High-Speed Railway (HSR) Construction by Country (1965-2019) youtu.be/zkMnxJF22O8?list=PLZR7QFDVc72MMo7fUAT-IwpV08Ngb6L3D&t=120s Countries by High-Speed Railway Track 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. France (3,870 km) 4. Germany (3,596 km) 5. Japan (3,422 km) 6. Russia (2,026 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,997 km) 8. Italy (1,697 km) 9. South Korea (1,481 km) 10. Finland (744 km)
    1
  22416.  @abbotsful  Besides fast trains, China is home to 1 of top 5 of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) Video: Sunway TaihuLight named world's fastest supercomputer youtu.be/KEdsrT1mFAU
    1
  22417. The Soviet Union was an innovative scientific power indeed, but the People's Republic of China was never a part of the Soviet Union.
    1
  22418.  @MarkYeung1  Banning opposition parties (even if they are pro-Russian) is not what an alleged democracy like Ukraine will do. And what's the point of Ukraine having more than dozen other parties to chose from when Zelenskyy cancelled the elections in 2024? Meanwhile. Putin has already announced his candidacy for the 2024 presidential elections, so it's apparent there are other candidates to vote for in Russia. Also, Russia has been attacked when it's border city of Belgarod became the target of Ukrainian missiles. Also since there was no peace deal for the Korean War, that means North Korea is still technically at war with the USA.
    1
  22419.  @MarkYeung1  There are Ukrainian forces present in Donetsk and Lughansk, both of which voted to join the Russian Federation. A bridge in Crimea was also targeted and Ukraine claimed responsibility for the attack. North Korea was invaded by South Korea when the US forces crossed the 38th Parallel and entered North Korean territory. Since there was no peace treaty to end the Korean War, then technically North Korea is technically still at war with South Korea and the USA. The Kuomintang party that fought against the CPC fled the mainland and retreated to Taiwan island. Since there was no formal peace treaty to end the Chinese Civil War, then technically the Chinese Civil War is still ongoing. Additionally, the DPP party is occupying the Chinese territory of Taiwan island.
    1
  22420.  @MarkYeung1  The Chinese people have a choice to join any of these 8 political parties if they want, and take part in the system providing an advisory role. This system clearly works for China, then is there any real need to change it? Why is your mind so fixated on the version of democracy taught to you, when it can produce leaders like Trump? Not just him, but look at Canada's Trudeu, Britain's Sunak, France's Macron, German's Scholtz, and they have record low levels of approval. Whereas around 90% of Chinese support the Chinese government.
    1
  22421. Countries all over the acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  22422. Even the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  22423.  @MarkYeung1  The Chinese people have a choice to join any of these 8 political parties if they want, and take part in the system providing an advisory role to make China better. Whereas in the US, the two parties fight against each other and sabotage the other side.
    1
  22424. ​ @MarkYeung1  The non-communist political parties in China have made important contributions to help tackle major risks and challenges in the past years as good advisers, helpers and colleagues of the CPC. The Chinese Peasants' and Workers' Democratic Party (CPWDP) contributed greatly to the nation's battle against the pandemic. Nearly 30,000 medical workers who are members of the fought on the front lines of the epidemic, the chairman said, adding that as of the end of last year, the members have donated goods and materials for epidemic control worth 1.23 billion yuan ($178 million). The party utilized its medical resources to submit 20 pieces of information and suggestions to the CPC central leadership and the State Council, and raised their suggestions on epidemic control with the CPC in many meetings, he said. In the next five years, the party will focus on topics including the aging population, elderly care, childbirth support policies and major infectious diseases Starting from 2021, the eight parties launched a five-year supervision campaign on environmental protection along the Yangtze River. The China Democratic League (CDL) is in charge of supervising the protection of the river in Yunnan province, and in the past two years they have sorted out 600 issues that needed to be further monitored after field surveys and meetings with local authorities.
    1
  22425.  @MarkYeung1  Starting from 2021, the eight parties launched a five-year supervision campaign on environmental protection along the Yangtze River. The China Democratic League (CDL) is in charge of supervising the protection of the river in Yunnan province, and in the past two years they have sorted out 600 issues that needed to be further monitored after field surveys and meetings with local authorities.
    1
  22426.  @MarkYeung1  Nearly 30,000 medical workers from the Chinese Peasants' and Workers' Democratic Party (CPWDP) contributed greatly to the nation's battle against the epidemic. The party members have donated goods and materials for epidemic control worth 1.23 billion yuan ($178 million). In the next five years, the party will focus on topics including the aging population, elderly care, childbirth support policies and major infectious diseases. Beginning from 2021, the 8 parties launched a five-year supervision campaign on environmental protection along the Yangtze River. The China Democratic League (CDL) is in charge of supervising the protection of the river in Yunnan province, and in the past two years they have sorted out 600 issues that needed to be further monitored after field surveys and meetings with local authorities.
    1
  22427.  Cyrus Janssen  You're not the real Cyrus Janssen, your account was created on Feb 2021, why are you copying his username and profile picture?
    1
  22428.  @LouisTsuiful  难道你不懂英文，就重复我说的话？
    1
  22429.  @LouisTsuiful  虽然学英文真的很难，但是不写就不进步。我开始写英文的时候，也有不少外国人笑我的Chinglish，但慢慢就达到了这水平。
    1
  22430.  LOU ALEX  China has no problems importing wheat and other foods from countries like Russia for example, but the United States is facing a shortage of baby formula.
    1
  22431.  @fireturkeyfly11  You said: "since I am free from communism I feel so free and happy." Capitalism is prioritizing profits over lives, that's why the U.S just allow the virus to spread uncontrollably. Whereas the communist government in China actually prioritize lives over profits, that's why there's lock down to curb its spread and save lives.
    1
  22432.  @fireturkeyfly11  You said: "since I am free from communism I feel so free and happy." But covid is spreading uncontrollably throughout the West and claiming lives. Whereas in China, lives are being saved thanks to lockdowns.
    1
  22433.  @fireturkeyfly11  Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  22434.  @fireturkeyfly11  Those measures have helped save millions in China. But you can't say the same for the West.
    1
  22435.  @fireturkeyfly11  I'm happy that at least in parts of China, cities are doing their best to preserve unnecessary lost of lives to the virus. Wheres the U.S is has 4% of the world's population but home to 25% of the world's covid deaths.
    1
  22436.  @fireturkeyfly11  I'm happy that at least in parts of China, cities are doing their best to preserve unnecessary lost of lives to the virus. But that's not happening the West.
    1
  22437. ​ @buckygoldstein9256  "At one time there were over 100 countries that did recognize Taiwan. Many of these countries dropped their recognition in order to placate the PRC..." It just goes to show that PRC is the real China, since the Communist Party of China is in charge of the mainland after all, and that countries themselves choose to recognize Beijing over Taipei, due to economic benefits that the mainland was able to offer that Taiwan island is not. In fact, mainland China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military expenditure. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 21st in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ("Made in Taiwan" used to be commonplace, now it's been replaced by "Made in China") Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on U.S weapons imports. Worst of all, Taiwan is losing recognition like you said. Just recently the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua switched their recognition of Taipei to Beijing.
    1
  22438.  @buckygoldstein9256  You said: "China belongs to Taiwan, not the other way around. Yes, I think mainland China should be returned to Taiwan" Why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage compared to the Kuomintang. The KMT had massive wealth (taxed from peasants) superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet despite all these advantages, the KMT lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China. Why then should it be mainland China be returned to Taiwan?
    1
  22439.  @buckygoldstein9256  When the Japanese invaded Manchuria, KMT leader Chiang kai-shek was reluctant to meet the invaders, instead he continued purging communists (our fellow Chinese brethren) until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap Chiang in order to force him to ally with the communists against the Japanese invaders. This incident is known as the Xi'An incident (西安事变) Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was thanks to communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release that he finally agreed to ally with the communists against the Japanese. You said: "He "abandoned" China to the PRC who never held any real claims over the island." When the communists overthrew the KMT, the PRC *inherited ROC's claim *that Taiwan is part of China. Much like how when KMT overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty, the KMT inherited Qing's claim over China. In fact, if you look up the map of Republic of China's claims, they claim all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as well as territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Wikipedia has a Map of Republic of China's claims available. --> Source: Wikipedia:File:ROC Administrative and Claims
    1
  22440.  @buckygoldstein9256  You said: "I have no idea who or what the evil Hiruto is, please explain." Because most Westerners knowledge of WW2 is limited to Europe not so much Asia, so even if you misspell Hitler's name, people still know you are referring to him. But if you misspell Japanese Emperor Hirohito's name, many Westerners cannot make the connection. I mean, everyone knows the name of the German leader and Italian leader during WWII, yet the Japanese Emperor's name is forgotten?
    1
  22441.  @cchc245  "神州 Shenzhou Because China uses threats to anyone that established a relationship with Taiwan." Congrats, you've just proven that Taiwan isn't an independent country after all, since Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can. The fact of the matter is that mainland China exerts control over Taiwan that's why they aren't an independent country. You said: "The fact of matter is, China has no control/say over Taiwan politics." Then why is it when athletes from Taiwan participate in the Olympics, they can only do so under the banner of "Chinese Taipei"? Why is it Taiwan cannot join the UN like an independent country can?
    1
  22442.  @cchc245  You said: "If Taiwan is part of china, why is it that they have a Democracy government," China is unique in the sense that China allows multiple political systems to exist within our borders. Just like how Hong Kong has their own separate HK government, HK currency, HK passport, etc, but is still considered part of China under the One Country, Two Systems policy, Taiwan is also part of China under the One China policy, despite having a separate government, currency, passport, etc. You said: "That's how a free, democratic country works. Taiwan won't lock their citizens in their own homes for 2 months without food, china will." So when Trump lockdown the U.S, does that mean America is not a free, democratic country? As for being without food, the U.S had a shortage of baby formula at one stage, so it isn't democratic then?
    1
  22443.  @buckygoldstein9256  You said: "Taiwan never promised to retake the mainland, that was Chiang Kai-shek's Promise. That promise died along with Chiang, or at least by 1988 when Lee Teng-hui became president." Taiwan has never amended its constitution to reflect that. According to Republic of China's constitution, Taiwan still claims all of mainland China (including Xinjiang, Tibet, Manchuria, Inner Mongolia, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Wikipedia has a Map that Taiwan still claims all of mainland China as part of their territory. Source: Wikipedia:File:ROC Administrative and Claims You said: "However Taiwan has surpassed the PRC in technology." Are you certain? Let's take supercomputers for example, and China is home to one of top 10 world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway TaihuLight (神威·太湖之光) which was considered the world's fastest supercomputer in 2016. In the TOP500 fastest supercomputers, China ranks top in the world with 173 supercomputers, compared to U.S at number two with 149 supercomputers. Distribution of supercomputers in the TOP500 list by country (as of November 2021) 1. China (173) 2. United States (149) 3. Japan (32) 4. Germany (26) 5. France (19) 6. Canada (11) 7. United Kingdom (11) 8. South Korea (7) 9. Russia (7) 10. Italy (6) ... Source: TOP500 But where are the supercomputers from Taiwan as compared to mainland China?
    1
  22444.  @buckygoldstein9256  You said: "Taiwan isn't loosing recognition because it isn't important. It's loosing recognition because of the PRC's importance, as a manufacturer, a market place and it's growing military power." So if anything, it just demonstrates that the communists deserve to rule China, given what they were able to accomplish in the mainland that the KMT or DPP weren't able to accomplish in Taiwan island. Why then do you claim that Taiwan government deserves to rule all of mainland China, given that can't even compete with the likes of the mainland? You said: "The US is starting to bring that manufacturing back home and to outsource to countries other than the PRC." Are American workers willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers? If not, then the cost of Made-in-America goods will be pricier than Made-in-China goods. Given that the U.S dollar is strengthening, it would mean that costs of Made-in-America goods will be less attractive to consumers compared to Made-in-China, so where would America sell their products? As for outsourcing to countries other than the PRC, do those countries have the necessary infrastructure (for example, ports) to ship their finished goods back to the USA? China is actually home to many of the world's busiest ports like Ningbo-Zhousan, Shanghai, Tangshan, Guangzhou, Qingdao, etc. ... Source: Wikipedia: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage
    1
  22445.  @buckygoldstein9256  You said: "Between 1958 and 1962, under Mao, 45 million people starved to death in China as the result of the largest socialist experiment in history." Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death (like you said) because of the Great Chinese Famine, which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. As for this figure of 45 million starving to death from 1958-1962, are you sure that isn't exaggerated? In 1955, China's population was 612,241,552 and by 1960, China's population was 660,408,054, having increased by 48,166,502 in just 5 years.. China's Population 1950: 554,419,268 1955: 612,241,552 1960: 660,408,054 1965: 724,218,970 1970: 827,601,385 ... Source: Population Pyramid So you claim that from 1958-1962, China's population decreased by 45 million, yet from 1955-1960, China's population had actually increased by 48 million?
    1
  22446.  @buckygoldstein9256  " 神州 Shenzhou (Taiwan and the UN) Yes there is a force that prevents Taiwan from joining the UN...Taiwan applies to the UN every year and the PRC vetos it." Congrats, you've just shown that Taiwan is not an independent country after all, since the mainland controls exerts control over Taiwan's policy.
    1
  22447.  @cchc245  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwan never accepted the on country two systems buddy." Both Taiwan and mainland China at least accepted the 1992 Consensus (九二共识) that there is only One China. President Xi actually offered the One Country, Two Systems policy to include Taiwan, this would allow Taiwan to keep their own separate government, currency, passport, (even keep their own army) yet be considered fully reunified with China. (It would be like a hypothetical scenario where North Kore and South Korea both agree to reunify into a single country, Korea, while allowing both sides to keep their respective governments) But former President Ma rejected President Xi's offer and did not offer a counter proposal of their own. You said: "China can change hong kong leadership and did." How did mainland China change Hong Kong leadership? Mainland China does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's election.
    1
  22448.  @cchc245  "神州 Shenzhou No, unlike China, Taiwan doesn't want war." Mainland China doesn't want war, as long as the One China policy is observed that Taiwan is part of China. However, the separatists in the island that seek to make a move towards independence, and the mainland will have to respond to such provocations in order to retain control over our territory. In fact, according to polls, only a small percentage (5.6%) of the people in Taiwan want independence, the vast majority (87%) favor the status quo. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China, and any move to declare independence would be seen as changing the status quo (an outcome that the majority of people in Taiwan do not support).
    1
  22449.  @buckygoldstein9256  "神州 Shenzhou The fact that the PRC has more workers that are lower paid than the ROC isn't because of the communists." Well, who is responsible for it then? Also, my question is are American workers willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers? If not, then the prices of Made-in-America goods are going to be pricier than Made-in-China good, and are you sure that given the inflation in America today, that Americans will buy those pricier American goods? In fact, it's actually thanks to affordable Chinese goods that has made the cost of living in America lower than it should be. Think about the millions of dollars Americans have saved over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Isn't that why many Americans often flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? You said: "We don't have any Chinese autos or fighter planes or submarines in the US." Look, even the U.S Air Force and Navy has admitted that they are buying Chinese-manufactured drones for elite forces.
    1
  22450.  @buckygoldstein9256  You said: "I asked my friend Charlie (I won't give his Chinese name...and he said he hated the government. " Your friend's story only constitutes anecdotal evidence, that cannot be verified (since we don't have his actual name) so you could have just made up that story on the spot to discredit the Chinese government that's all. On the other hand, a long-term study by Harvard University and Ash Center has revealed that some 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Chinese government. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. You said: "The PRC hasn't been able to duplicate the Taiwanese level of technology in semiconductor manufacturing." China's top chipmaker, SMIC has made a chip breakthrough in the fabrication of 7nm chips for use in semiconductors, likely advancing its production technology by two generations and in defiance of U.S sanctions.
    1
  22451.  @buckygoldstein9256  China's Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) is made entirely from domestic chisp and is ranked among the world's Top 10 fastest supercomputers, yet Taiwan doesn't even have a supercomputer that ranks in the Top 50. Yet you're claiming Taiwan has surpassed the PRC in technology? Not just fast computers, but China has the world's largest high-speed railway (HSR) network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen and Taiwan island's HSR in terms of size. Our high-speed trains are very fast, the journeys smooth and enjoyable, and passengers have even balanced a coin on its edge in a train traveling at 350 kmph with the coin falling over. High Speed Railway construction by country in 2019 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. France (3,870 km) 4. Germany (3,596 km) 5. Japan (3,422 km) 6. Russia (2,026 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,997 km) 8. Italy (1,697 km) 9. South Korea (1,481 km) 10. Finland (744 km) ... Source: YouTube: High-Speed Railway (HSR) Construction by Country (1965-2019)
    1
  22452.  @buckygoldstein9256  Apart from supercomputers, China has made massive strides in Artificial Intelligence. For example, China has unveiled the world's first AI news anchor, as well as the world's first female AI news anchor. Yet you're claiming Taiwan has surpassed the mainland in technology?
    1
  22453.  @cchc245  You said: "My question is, do you have a better method on unifying Taiwan and China other than war?" Of course. I've already said President Xi offered to extend the 1 Country, 2 System to include Taiwan, allowing the island to keep their own separate government, currency, passport, (even keep their army) but still be considered fully reunified with mainland China. I made a comparison to a hypothetical scenario where North Korea and South Korea agree to unify as a single country, Korea, while allowing both sides to keep their separate governments, and this is the offer that President Xi offered to former Taiwan President Ma. But President Ma rejected without offering any reasons why he rejected this offer, and neither did he offer a counter proposal. You said: "Do you know if China isnt pointing thousands of missles at Taiwan, Taiwa would've been a huge supporter of China?" Do you know if Taiwan didn't allow U.S warships to sail into the Taiwan Straits, then mainland China won't see the need to deploy missiles to defend against the U.S trespassing? You said: "do you known which country Donated the most money to China in Sichuan earth quake?" Do you know that mainland China has been increasing water supplies to ease Taiwan drought?
    1
  22454.  @cchc245  "Taiwan has freedom, and the ability to critique our own government. China you cant." Taiwan TV host, Huang Chih-Hsien (黃智賢) had her TV broadcasting license revoked just because she was a supporter of Taiwan's reunification with the mainland. The DPP government in Taiwan has been refusing to renew broadcasting licenses of opposition media. As for mainland China, just recently Beijing scrapped a vaccine mandate to allow only vaccinated people to enter crowded venues such as libraries, cinemas and gym, following a strong online backlash to the measure. Whereas Canadian truckers in the "Freedom Convoy" protesting vaccine mandates had their bank accounts frozen. You said: "If you say you can you are blind." I've just proven that Beijing dropped plans for a vaccine mandate after facing online backlash from Chinese netizens, so does this mean I am blind or are you the one who's blind? (I also find it hypocritical of you, that on one hand, you say you tolerate opposing views, yet here you are calling me "blind" just because I have a different view.) You said: "Prior covid alot of my chinese friends debated on the freedom china had. After the lockdowns and some almost starved to death, changed their minds and are seeking to immigrate out of china." Like I told Bucky Goldstein, this is just anecdotal evidence taken from you and who knows, you could have just cooked up this story on the spot.
    1
  22455.  @cchc245  You said: "By the way, before you think I am bashing China, I am not. I love Chinese culture, chinese people, some of my best friends are Chinese." You sound exactly like those people who use defense of "I'm not racist, some of my best friends are African American." as an excuse to justify their racist behavior. Except that this time you are using "Chinese" instead of "African Americans".
    1
  22456.  @cchc245  "神州 Shenzhou Hong Kongs leader is appointed by Chinese government, what do you think the Hong Kong riot is about??" That's in accordance with Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條) which states that: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government. - Article 45 of Hong Kong Basic Law So China did not violate Hong Kong basic law and that the Central People's Government (aka Beijing) reserves the right to appoint the Hong Kong Chief Executive in accordance with Article 45.
    1
  22457.  @cchc245  You said: "The one party two system is gone in Hong Kong. And majority of Hong Kongers sees themselves as chinese." Firstly, it's because Hong Kongers ARE Chinese, and Secondly, the One Country, Two System policy is still in effect in Hong Kong, because they have their own separate HK government, HK currency, HK passport, etc. You said: "Ask yourself if you are willing to go to war to unify a lost cause." You should be asking the separatists in the island that question. China doesn't want war, but that does not mean China is weak. China is not afraid of war, and if those separatists want to declare independence, then they should get out of the Chinese territory of Taiwan and find another plot of land to claim for their new country.
    1
  22458.  @cchc245  "what do you think the Hong Kong riot is about??" The Hong Kong Extradition Bill was proposed because a Hong Kong guy (name Chan) took his pregnant girlfriend (Poon) to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, before flying back to Hong Kong alone and leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. The guy Chan has since confessed to his crime, and Taiwan wanted to extradite him to Taiwan to face justice, but Hong Kong realized that they have no existing extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, Hong Kong courts are powerless to convict Chan of crimes that occurred outside of Hong Kong's jurisdiction. That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the Hong Kong Extradition Bill. If not, then people will be able to exploit this legal loophole and commit crimes elsewhere before seeking haven in Hong Kong. But did the Hong Kong rioters even read the extradition bill in its entirety and understand it's contents? You said: "Taiwan isnt pointing missles at China, China is pointing missles at Taiwan." China's southeastern front is where U.S warships are sailing and trespassing into Chinese territorial waters (including into the Taiwan Straits) so naturally that is where China's missiles will be deployed facing outwards, which happens to be in the direction of Taiwan island. If Taiwan were fully reunified with the mainland, then those missiles would be deployed to protect Taiwan instead.
    1
  22459.  @cchc245  China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western MSM constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  22460.  @cchc245  The Communist Party of China has transformed China from a once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending.
    1
  22461.  @cchc245  "神州 Shenzhou No, I dont hide my distaste and hatred towards the CCP, thats the difference." Over 70 years ago, literally nobody thought "communist" China would succeed, but China has defied all expectations of failure and transformed from a once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership.
    1
  22462.  @buckygoldstein9256  "神州 Shenzhou So what if China has the largest high speed rail network." It means China can not only manufacture goods, but deliver them rapidly to customers. Through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) China plans to connect Europe to China and all the landlocked countries in between to improve trade. It's also a demonstration of China's technological prowess. You said: "Now tell me about the Chinese spy ship, the Yuan Wang 5," How on earth is a 25,000 ton Chinese ship considered a "spy ship" when it's just so noticeable?
    1
  22463.  @buckygoldstein9256  "神州 Shenzhou So what if China has the largest high speed rail network." It means China can not only manufacture goods, but deliver them rapidly to customers. Through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) China plans to connect Europe to China and all the landlocked countries in between to improve trade. It's also a demonstration of China's technological prowess. Also, how is a 25,000 ton Chinese ship considered a "spy ship" when it's just so noticeable out there?
    1
  22464.  @buckygoldstein9256  "神州 Shenzhou Technology increases worker production which reduces the number of workers needed to produce the same amount." China is investing heavily into robotics and automation and already, China is the world's largest market for automation. The Port of Qingdao is Asia's first automated container terminal, that makes use of driveless trucks to ferry containers as well as automated cranes to load and unload ships. The automated port can even operate 24 hours, even at night in complete darkness (saving on lighting bill) You said: "Congress has just provided a lot of money to develop semiconductor foundries here in the US." Yes, because once the U.S is able to fabricate chips domestically, they will no longer see a need to rely on chips from Taiwan, which means the island is of no further use to the United States, and decreases the possibility that the U.S will send troops to defend Taiwan in case of an attack. You said: "many Chinese companies have business sites in the US. Do they hire US workers or are they too expensive?" Could you name some of these Chinese companies in the U.S? And are they manufacturing in the United States or in China before being shipped over? You said: "As for manufacturing that isn't worth the cost of US labor, India Vietnam and countries in South America will be glad to do so." How will India and Vietnam ship over their finished goods all the way to the United States if the port infrastructure just isn't as good as China's? Like I said, China is home to many of the world's busiest ports. List of busiest container ports in 2020 1. Shanghai (China): 43,500 TEUs 2. Singapore (Singapore): 36,000 TEUs 3. Ningbo-Zhoushan (China): 8,720 TEUs 4. Shenzhen (China): 26,550 TEUs 5. Guangzhou (China): 23,190 TEUs 6. Qingdao (China): 22,000 TEUs 7. Busan (South Korea): 21,590 TEUs 8. Hong Kong (China): 20,070 TEUs 9. Tianjin (China): 18,350 TEUs 10 Los Angeles (United States): 17,310 TEUs ... Source: Wikipedia:List of busiest container ports
    1
  22465.  @buckygoldstein9256  "The Switchblade Drones are made in Arizona." Switchblade drones were shown to be not that effective against Russian tanks. And it doesn't change the fact that the U.S Airforce and Navy has admitted to using Chinese-made drones for their elite forces. You said: "Walmart will go to India also." India just doesn't have the ports that China has, in order to ship those Made-in-India goods all the way to the United States. Walmart's prices are going to increase if they outsource to India. You said: "Inflation is coming down fast in the US." The U.S already fits the requirements of a technical recession, but they just refuse to admit to it that's all. You said: "How is the Chinese economy doing?" China’s trade surplus rose to a record as exports grew faster than expected, easing some concerns over waning global demand. China's trade balance climbed to about $101 billion in July, surpassing the previous record set in June, which is the highest in data compiled since 1987. Exports in dollar terms grew 18% from a year earlier, beating economists’ estimates for a 14.1% gain.
    1
  22466.  @buckygoldstein9256  You said: "I don't know what you have against the US." And I don't know what you have against China. The U.S recognizes the One China policy that Taiwan is part of China, yet it still seeks to interfere in China's internal affairs. You said: "President Xi claims the US is trying to hold China back." That's true, just look at Trump's slapping economic tariffs on China in an vain attempt to contain China's rise. Even after Trump, President Biden isn't doing anything to roll back Trump's tariffs on China. You said: "If it wasn't for the US, China wouldn't be the rich capitalist country it is today." If it weren't for China, the Americans wouldn't have access to affordable goods that would make the cost of living in U.S lower than it should be. You said: "President Xi is going to make it poor again. Enjoy your prosperity while it lasts." President Xi is tackling inequality in China through his "Common Prosperity" policy, by redistributing wealth from China's richer Eastern port cities (i.e Beijing, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Shanghai, etc) to the rural Western landlocked regions like Tibet and Xinjiang through the Belt and Road Initiative.
    1
  22467.  @buckygoldstein9256  "Tell me something bad that China did." China's industrialization has resulted in air pollution, due to the burning of fossil fuels which produce smog and pollute our environment. So the government built the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam, to produce clean, renewable energy to fuel our growth. This makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity. Countries by Hydroelectricity Generation (2018) 1. China (1,229 TWh) 2. Brazil (414 TWh) 3. Canada (282 TWh) 4. United States (294 TWh) 5. Russia (184 TWh) 6. Norway (139 TWh) 7. India (130 TWh) 8. Japan (88 TWh) 9. Venezuela (70 TWh) 10. France (62 TWh) ... Source: YouTube: Top 20 Country by Hydropower Electricity Generation (1965-2019)
    1
  22468.  @buckygoldstein9256  One bad thing about China is the introduction of capitalism. Many American workers think bad about China because much of America's manufacturing has been outsourced to China due to lower wages. This is how capitalism operates where companies seek to shrink workers wages in order to extract a higher profit margin, and Deng's economic reforms in late 1970s has resulted in de-industrialization of the United States while increasing income inequality in China. Fortunately, President Xi is seeking to reverse the ill effects of capitalism through the "Common Prosperity" policy, by bringing wealth from the rich Eastern port cities (i.e Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, etc) to the poorer landlocked Western regions (i.e Tibet, Xinjiang, etc). If successful, this policy would ensure a more equal distribution of China's wealth and hopefully narrow the income gap.
    1
  22469.  @buckygoldstein9256  "神州 Shenzhou I don't want to go back and forth on this subject of who's better." But earlier you boasted that (quoting your words): "However Taiwan has surpassed the PRC in technology." then can't I bring up China's technological prowess? For example, China is making advancements in 5G technology, the world's first 5G remote surgery was conducted in China. _China has successfully tested the world’s first remote-surgery equipment using 5G mobile network technology. A doctor removed the liver of a laboratory test animal by controlling robotic surgical arms over a 5G connection while 50 km away from the operating theater. _ ... Source: YouTube: China completes world’s first 5G remote surgery in test on animal Yet you still boasted that Taiwan has surpassed the PRC in technology?
    1
  22470.  @buckygoldstein9256  So you can boast about Taiwan surpassing the PRC in technology, then can't I bring up more of the mainland's tech prowess? China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei (杨利伟) became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft, making China the 3rd country in the world to independently send humans into space. Source: YouTube: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space Yet you're boasting Taiwan's technology has surpassed PRC, then why haven't Taiwan launched any people into space? You said: "You were claiming that the world didn't recognize Taiwan because China could provide products to the world better." That's because it's true. Mainland China can indeed provide products to the world better than Taiwan. A few decades ago, Taiwan used to have a thriving manufacturing base, but most of it has since been outsourced to mainland China. So much such that the Made-in-Taiwan label has been replaced by the Made-in-China label. So isn't it true that this is one of the reasons why the world choose to recognize Beijing over Taipei? You said: "Are you claiming that China (PRC) never did anything bad?" Didn't I point out some bad things about China previously? Did you read my previous comments?
    1
  22471.  @buckygoldstein9256  So you can boast about Taiwan surpassing the PRC in technology, then can't I bring up more of the mainland's tech prowess? China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei (杨利伟) became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft, making China the 3rd country in the world to independently send humans into space. You said: "You were claiming that the world didn't recognize Taiwan because China could provide products to the world better." That's because it's true. Mainland China can indeed provide products to the world better than Taiwan. A few decades ago, Taiwan used to have a thriving manufacturing base, but most of it has since been outsourced to mainland China. So much such that the Made-in-Taiwan label has been replaced by the Made-in-China label. You said: "Are you claiming that China (PRC) never did anything bad?" Didn't I point out some bad things about China in my previous comments?
    1
  22472.  @buckygoldstein9256  So you can boast about Taiwan surpassing the PRC in technology, then can't I bring up more of the mainland's tech prowess? China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei (杨利伟) became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft, making China the 3rd country in the world to independently send humans into space. You said: "You were claiming that the world didn't recognize Taiwan because China could provide products to the world better." That's because it's true. Mainland China can indeed provide products to the world better than Taiwan. Made-in-Taiwan products used to be commonplace, but now it's been largely replaced by Made-in-China. You said: "Are you claiming that China (PRC) never did anything bad? Didn't I point out some bad things about China in my previous comments?
    1
  22473.  @MrBAchompBAchomp  You said in America you don't have to worry about being locked in, it just means your government don't care about containing the virus spread. That's why it spread like wildfire and USA become the country with the highest number of COVID deaths. It was recorded that USA has just 4% of the world's population, but home to 25% of the world's COVID deaths during the pandemic.
    1
  22474.  @Alblaka  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  22475.  @Alblaka  You said: "I cannot set foot in China, because... they have legal ground to arrest me, because I posted a negative view of China on the internet once." Nonsense. I mean, which foreigner has been arrested in China just for posting a negative view of China on the Internet once? Your paranoia is precisely what they want in order to prevent you from visiting China and finding out the truth.
    1
  22476. I have a question, when's the last time you actually revisited China? China today is actually prosperous under the Communist Party rule, whereas Hong Kong is suffering under its own democratic government rule.
    1
  22477.  @ernestosamuelsen6984  Source: China overtakes US as Africa’s top trading partner businessdailyafrica.com/corporate/539550-850122-view-asAMP-weqnvxz/index.html
    1
  22478. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  22479.  @anthonyjackson7336  The communists built the first Tibetan colleges in Lhasa, when previously the education is monopolized by the Tibetan priesthood. Here's a list of universities and colleges in Tibet: -Tibet University (西藏大学, Lhasa and Nyingchi) -Tibet Minzu University (西藏民族学院, located in Xianyang, Shaanxi but under supervision of the Tibetan provincial government) -Tibet University of Traditional Tibetan Medicine (西藏藏医学院, Lhasa) -Tibet Vocational Technical College (西藏职业技术学院, Lhasa) -Tibet Police Officers Institute (西藏警官高等专科学校, Lhasa) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of universities and colleges in Tibet
    1
  22480.  @anthonyjackson7336  Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western MSM constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  22481.  @Andy-P  But mainland China didn't fire any missiles at Taiwan and there's no PLA troop buildup in the Taiwan strait (unlike the Russian troop buildup at its border with Ukraine). Whereas when Trump fired 59 Tomahawk missiles at Syria, the Western countries didn't care and many even supported the attack?
    1
  22482.  @Andy-P  The American War of Independence was a Civil War and the South lost to the North. But both are part of the United States of America, just like mainland China and Taiwan are Chinese territory, so why are you claiming Taiwan isn't Chinese territory when your words indicate that it is?
    1
  22483.  @stopwarstop7334  1) So let's take the Japanese out of the picture. After the Japanese surrendered in 1945, the KMT had a strength of: -2 million (regular) -2.3 million (militia) (June 1946) ... Whereas the Communists had a strength of: -1.2 million (regular) -2.6 million (militia) (July 1945) ... Source: Wikipedia: Chinese Civil War So the KMT had a total strength of 4.3 million, whereas the Communists had a total strength of 3.8 million, so the KMT had larger numbers over the communists. Yet despite this numerical advantage, the KMT still lost the mainland to the communists and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China. And mind you, this is after 1945, after the Japanese surrendered, so there was no more fighting the Japanese.
    1
  22484.  @stopwarstop7334  2) The Nationalist KMT had US backing behind them. But the KMT was so corrupt that they pocketed some $750,000,000 worth of U.S military aid, until even the US President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves"
    1
  22485.  @Andy-P  You said: "I don't think China ie the right full owner of Taiwan, or the SCS or the East China Sea." China claimed the South China Sea Islands back in 1947 when the Republic of China 🇹🇼 published the 11 Dash Line (in which the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 later removed two dashes to become the 9 Dash Line). So Taiwan actually still claims a larger region of the SCS than the mainland. As for the East China Sea, the Diaoyu Islands were historically part of China, but was invaded and occupied by the Japanese during the war. After the 1945 Japanese surrender, the Japanese relinquished all their previously occupied territory, yet the Diaoyu Islands wasn't returned back to China. Like the mainland, even Taiwan also claims the Diaoyu Islands as part of their territory.
    1
  22486.  @Andy-P  My bad. So while the American war of Independence wasn't a civil war, the American Civil War was clearly a Civil War between the North and South, both of whom are US territories.. So when you're talking about the Chinese Civil War it's the same thing between the mainland and Taiwan, both territories are Chinese.
    1
  22487.  @stopwarstop7334  "神州 Shenzhou Where is your evidence that the KMT has corrupted??" At 2:10 Cyrus Jannsen clearly said that the USA invested hundreds of millions of dollars in to backing the KMT leader Chiang kai-shek. Due to KMT corruption, Chiang kai-shek was nicknamed "Cash my Check!" at 2:34 of the video. Then we have the remarks of US President Harry S. Truman who wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves", having taken $750 million in US aid.
    1
  22488.  @stopwarstop7334  "神州 Shenzhou How can you take Japanese out of the picture?" Because you said the "Nationalist lost mainland because 1) They were busy fighting the Japanese when the CCP backstabbed from behind." but I've already shown that when you take the Japanese out of the picture, after 1945 when Japan surrendered, the KMT had a strength of 2 million (regular), 2.3 million (militia) (June 1946) whereas the Communists had a strength of 1.2 million (regular), 2.6 million (militia) (July 1945). So even after the Japanese surrendered, the KMT strength still outnumbered the communists, yet the KMT still lost the mainland to the communists and had to flee to Taiwan? And mind you, this was after the Japanese surrendered in 1945, so there was no more fighting the Japanese, then what excuse doe the KMT have to lose to the communists despite their numerical superiority?
    1
  22489. +eathenbad Tibet is recognized as part of PRC today, and UN countries have recognized China's sovereignty over Tibet, since nobody brings up the issue of Tibetan independence during UN meetings.
    1
  22490. eathenbad Tibet is legally part of China when Tibetan government signed the Seventeen Point Agreement in 1951, recognising Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Why are you still accusing China of illegal occupation when there is a document? Do countries in the world accuse USA of occupying Hawaii in Pacific Ocean?
    1
  22491. eathenbad It should also be noted that China's territorial disputes do not result in bloodshed, unlike USA bombing countries in Middle East today. That's why China's rise is peaceful for 30 years, but USA still involved in wars in Middle East, even in 21st century. If China truly bloodthirsty like USA, the military option would be exercised long ago to solve our problems and disputes.
    1
  22492. eathenbad My point that there is no bloodshed in China's disputes compared to USA. USA is world's superpower, so who would hold territorial disputes with it? USA annexed Texas from Mexico but what can Mexico do about it? Whether territory disputes or terrorism or other reasons, USA is still bombing countries in Middle East today, whereas China is peaceful and still open to talks regarding our territorial disputes. In my first post on this thread, I highlighted period in Chinese history where our naval power was supreme, yet China did not create colonies like Western powers. So why is it if Russia and USA disappeared tomorrow, China will suddenly take military action? China's presence is also preventing USA from taking military action in DPRK and creating unwanted war in East Asia, so why are you claiming my comparison is invalid?
    1
  22493. eathenbad What evidence do you even have to support your point at? You constantly dismiss all my points and historical evidence, and you expect me to believe your prediction without any proof whatsoever? As for Germany, remember that two world wars were fought in its name and that WW2 was only 70 years ago, so how is it ancient history? At least I provided historical evidence about China to support my claim, but you don't even have anything to support your own prediction.
    1
  22494. +eathenbad What about Japan being aggressive for many centuries? Japan invaded Korea and China during Ming dynasty in 1592 under Toyotomi Hideyoshi with the intent of conquering the Korean Peninsula and China. Ming dynasty even dispatched Chinese troops to Korea to help aid in repelling the invaders. Next, Japan invaded China again during 1st Sino-Japanese war in 1894 resulting in Korea being occupied for 50 years. Lastly, Japan also invaded China during 2nd Sino-Japanese war in 1931, 8 years before Nazi Germany invaded Poland at start of WW2. So whose to say Japan won't invade China again in the future, following this historical trend? China has all the resources Japan never had, which was why they keep on invading China time and time again, no matter what time period. So who can also say whether Italy and Germany will become aggressive again in future? Italy was expansionist during Rome and also allies with Germany during WW2, and Germany fought in both WW1 and WW2, so following this historical trend, who knows if Germany may become aggressive in future too as well? I have provided many historical sources to support my claims, but all you do is make predictions without drawing upon any sources at all, so what makes you think your prediction about China is correct? China been peaceful, even when Ming dynasty had the opportunity to colonize during Zheng He's voyages, so again how is my statement or opinion so wrong in your eyes? Chinese people are still the same Chinese people today, as we were centuries ago.
    1
  22495. eathenbad Why do you keep flipping on your point? You said Italy and Germany aren't aggressive today when I shown that Germany involved in two world wars as well as Italy to some extent, then now you suddenly change your point to reflect aggression? You are just being biased against China in your argument that's all. Why don't you provide evidence to support your prediction then? I listed many historical examples support my claims but so far you have failed to even produce any evidence support your prediction at all. So why should people take your prediction seriously? You claim I am making things up, but at least I have historical sources but you are making things up without ANY source whatsoever.
    1
  22496. eathenbad Excuse me but like you said, Han Chinese area was in Southern part of China, whereas Northern part of China, such as Mongolians and Manchu are considered foreigners. So it was Manchu who invaded Han Chinese so why do you appear to be blaming Han Chinese here, when it was foreign dynasties like Mongolian Yuan and Manchu Qing dynasties that invaded Korea in the first place? You are blaming Han Chinese for what Mongols and Manchus did to Korea? Han Chinese tend to be peaceful throughout history, brewing and drinking tea, making silk clothing (Hanfu) and writing poetry and calligraphy using Chinese characters (Hanzi) If you don't believe me, then take a look at Maps of Han Chinese dynasties like Song and Ming dynasties and compare them to foreign dynasties like Mongolian Yuan and Manchu Qing dynasty. The Han Chinese dynasties tend to be non-expansionist and therefore, smaller area compared to the foreign dynasties, so who are you to start insulting me just because my views differ from yours? You are just biased against me that's all.
    1
  22497. +eathenbad Hey why are you resorting to hurling insults at me now? So according to your logic, you should be blaming the Manchu people instead of Han Chinese, am I correct? Like you said, Han Chinese culture existed before Manchu, so again why do you appear to blame Han Chinese for actions of Manchu people? The Mongol empire was once world's largest empire stretching across Asia to parts of Western Europe. They even conquered Song dynasty China and because of this, are you going to blame Han Chinese again for brutal actions of Mongolians? You purposely being unfair and constantly blame Han Chinese for actions of foreign dynasties like Mongol and Manchu. During that period, those wars were to unify a divided China. During those battles it was Han Chinese fighting other Han Chinese for control of China, so why is it considered invading other countries? For example, Korea is divided into two, but are they both considered separate countries or two halves of the same country, Korea? Isn't that the same with China back then? Otherwise, what countries were China invading during that period, you tell me, since you claim to have studied Chinese history. Lastly, I do not resort to insulting you, simply because your views differ from mine, so why are you now attacking me personally instead of my points?
    1
  22498. eathenbad Firstly, 春秋戰國時代 is in 771 BC, which is before Han Dynasty in 200 BC. The concept of "Han Chinese" only created during Han dynasty, so why are you blaming the people who fought during 春秋戰國時代 as Han Chinese when the concept is only formed much later? Much of Han culture only formed during Han dynasty (hence the name) so why are you blaming the people during Spring and Autumn period in China as representive of China? You are just extremely biased person and constantly try to blame Han Chinese all the time, when it was Mongolians and Manchu rulers of China that were expansionist. As for Korea, what nonsense are you talking about about? According to following source, North Korean government claims to be sole legitimate government of Korea as does South Korean government, so why are you claiming that they regard each other as separate countries? Are you really sure that you are Korean, when you don't even know your own government's stance regarding entire Korea? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_limited_recognition
    1
  22499. eathenbad People in 春秋戰國時代 in 700 BC were indeed ancestors of Han Chinese, whose identity only began to take shape during Han dynasty in 200 BC. That is origin of Han dynasty name. So why are you blaming Han Chinese for what our ancestors did during Spring and Autumn period? You claim Han Chinese invaded countries during that period, then perhaps can you name the countries that China invaded during that period of time? Which country was even considered China at all? As for you, you don't even know South Korea's actual stance regarding North Korea at all, so how can you claim to be Korean if you don't even know your own government's thinking? Both governments consider themselves to be sole ruler of Korea, yet you claim they see each other as separate countries? Are you really true Korean then? There are South Koreans that have families in the North isn't it? So why are you claiming that South Korea officiai regard the North as foreign country?
    1
  22500.  @ActualJusticeWarrior  At 4:30 , why do you think China was better pre Communist Party? China was dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past under the Republic Of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) where China was divided into various warring provinces controlled by individual warlords and even Japan invaded China during this weak period of Chinese history. It was Mao Zedong and the Communists who succeeded in herculean task of reunifying our divided country and founded the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949.
    1
  22501.  @emberfist8347  Could you explain how the Communists were the reason why China was so war-torn? Before the rise of the communists, when Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Chairman Mao, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  22502.  bowden tv  How are Uighurs second rate citizens in China? Ethnic minorities in China enjoy various privileges over Han Chinese, such tax exemption, free education up to 15 years, priority in healthcare, special bursaries and education application advantages. For example, if applying for a university course, if a Han candidate needs 500 points to qualify, then an ethnic minority like Uighur needs only 300 points (easier to qualify for the exact same course). Ethnic minorities are also exempted from the 1-Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups So how are Uighurs a 2nd-class citizen in China, you tell me?
    1
  22503.  @emberfist8347  "神州 Shenzhou The Chinese Civil War began in 1927 so China didn't have war for at least a decade until Communism was popular." The Communist Party of China was founded in 1921 with only 50 members, but fast forward to today, and the CPC has survived for 100 years, and is among the world's largest political parties whose ranks have swelled to a membership of over 90 million (about the population size of Germany). And again, could you explain how were the Communists the reason why China is so war-torn? You said: "Also you can't say definitely China wouldn't be unified if it wasn't for Mao as that is a lie. Taiwan isn't part of the PRC and Hong Kong wasn't part of China during his tenure." Well, why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist KMT had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, heavily-outnumbered, ill-equiped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates the KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists' right to rule the mainland. As for Taiwan and Hong Kong, it's because the mainland was unified under Mao, that Taiwan and Hong Kong remain part of China. If you go and read Taiwan's constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. As for Hong Kong's 1997, Chairman Mao reunifying mainland China is what made China powerful enough so that Britain had to return Hong Kong back to mainland China in 1997. Had Mao failed to reunify China, the British won't have returned Hong Kong back to.. whatever was in place of China at that time.
    1
  22504.  bowden tv  The Uighurs attending re-education schools in Xinjiang are allowed to take the weekends off and the schools even charter buses to take students home during Saturday and Sundays. Which "detention camp" would allow their inmates to take the weekends off to be a home with their family? Video: Trainees can go home at weekends youtu.be/OrfBIH8d9Wc?t=182
    1
  22505.  @TimPortantno  In China's 5,000 years of history, Song (宋) dynasty China was previously been conquered by the Mongols, and the Mongol rulers eventually assimilated into Han Chinese culture and proclaimed their territories Yuan (元) dynasty China. Centuries later, the Manchurians conquered Ming (明) dynasty China and the Manchurians eventually assimilated and proclaimed their territories Qing (清) dynasty China. So China has a history of foreign occupation (by Mongols and Manchu) and eventually, foreigners assimilated into Chinese culture in the end. And the Chinese people under these rulers simply continued with their lives under foreign rulers.
    1
  22506. ​ @TimPortantno  Useless words? I'm explaining in detail China's history of foreign occupation (by Mongols and Manchu) and showing that Chinese people mostly went along with our lives under foreign rulers, until the rulers eventually assimilated into Chinese culture, how is that useless? I'm explaining to you Chinese culture, but if you are disinterested, then why ask me for info?
    1
  22507.  @TimPortantno  Worthless history? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  22508.  @TimPortantno  So apparently, you can't refute my points so you just dismiss my view altogether? Just because I voice a view that happens to differ from yours? Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made-in-China) having world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd largest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-China propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  22509.  @TimPortantno  About "might makes right," Chairman Mao Zedong once said that "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun" (枪杆子里面出政权). Back when Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Chairman Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today. So where China is concerned, our political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then what's wrong with the concept that "might makes right", when it works for China? Not all countries have to adopt Western brand of democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  22510.  Ken Man  "神州 Shenzhou If you live in China, then you are illegally using YouTube." Who says that YouTube is illegal in China? Nobody will come arrest you for logging on to YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested for doing so?
    1
  22511.  Ken Man  "神州 Shenzhou US tried to stop flights from China because of China Wuhan coronavirus. China accuses US of xenophobia ." When did China accuse US of xenophobia?
    1
  22512.  @jeffreyhinds6440  If democracy does not work for India, why not try switching to a different an alternative system, like when "democratic" Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) was replaced by the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 (1949~) under the communist government? Britain was colonial superpower during 19th century but was eventually overtaken by USA in 20th century. But prior to that, China (and also India) had been economic superpower for 1800 years and we made up 25% of the world's GDP share, according to world leading British economist, Angus Maddison. Source: Global distribution of GDP among China, India, Western Europe, USA, Middle East from 1 AD to 2003 AD wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA_Middle_East.png And judging from the above trend, it looks as though China is all set to dominate the 21st century.
    1
  22513.  @宋庆-i4m  You can get banned on Twitter, just for "deadnaming" someone (calling a transgender person by their given gender at birth). That's American freedom for you.
    1
  22514.  @宋庆-i4m  Even Canadian PM Justin Trudeu introduced a new law, making it illegal to refer to transgender people by the gender that they don't identify with, that's Canadian freedom for you.
    1
  22515.  @宋庆-i4m  You asked: "神州 Shenzhou Can I get married in China if I am Gay?" and "the question was can I still get married as a gay person in China?" Since this is what you asked, the answer is yes, even if you are gay, you can still take a woman as a wife and get married in China. China allows gay men to get married normally with female wives, since that's the normal definition of marriage.
    1
  22516.  @宋庆-i4m  "I was just referring to the fact that you can't get married as a gay person in China that's all." Who said so? There are gay men in China who have gotten normal marriages with women, so why are you claiming that gay people can't get married in China?
    1
  22517.  @宋庆-i4m  I never said anything about how gays get treated in African or Muslim countries, but I have answered your question about: "神州 Shenzhou Can I get married in China if I am Gay?" and "the question was can I still get married as a gay person in China?" The answer is yes, even if you are gay man, you can still take a woman as your legally wedded wife in China.
    1
  22518.  @宋庆-i4m  I have already answered your initial question so what more do you want out of me?
    1
  22519.  @宋庆-i4m  This was the question you asked: "神州 Shenzhou Can I get married in China if I am Gay?" and "the question was can I still get married as a gay person in China?" And I have long answered that yes, in China, a gay man is allowed to take a woman as his lawfully wedded wife, yet you're claiming it's a "fact that you can't get married as a gay person in China that's all." but that is clearly false, because a gay man can still take a woman as a wife and get married in China.
    1
  22520.  @宋庆-i4m  About marrying the one you love, even if in straight marriages people won't end up marrying the one they love, if the one they love don't love them back. Additionally, couples who've gotten married have gotten divorced later because one of them had an affair or something, it doesn't necessarily mean that people get to marry the ones they love.
    1
  22521.  @宋庆-i4m  "神州 Shenzhou Yes, and you like to take questions out of their context" When did I ever did that? You're the one asking me (and I quote your words): "神州 Shenzhou Can I get married in China if I am Gay?" and "the question was can I still get married as a gay person in China?" And I have long answered that yes, in China, a gay man is allowed to take a woman as his lawfully wedded wife, yet you're claiming it's a fact that gay person cannot get married in China? How have I taken your question out of context when those were your exact words?
    1
  22522.  @宋庆-i4m  If the person you love happens to be another man's wife, then can you marry the one you love? Of course not, every country has their own marriage laws.
    1
  22523.  @宋庆-i4m  You asked: "let me rephrase that can I get married to the person of the same sex in China?" "神州 Shenzhou Can you marry the person of the same sex as you in China?" "can you marry a person of the same sex in China?" "I was just asking can I marry the person of the same Sex in China?" "Can you marry the person of the same-sex in China? can a man marry man? can a women marry a women?" Since this is what you asked, then the answer is yes, you can marry a person of the same sex in China, you just have to travel to Taipei to register your marriage if you want to marry someone of the same gender as you in China.
    1
  22524.  @宋庆-i4m  "神州 Shenzhou Usually when you are gay (man) that means you don't find women attractive so you wouldn't want to marry them.....just in case you weren't aware of it.........I didn't think I needed to spell out every scenario for you......." Yes, but I was talking about the specific scenario where "If the person you love happens to be another man's wife, then can you marry the one you love?"
    1
  22525.  @宋庆-i4m  "...then you would be bragging about how this shows how much freedom China has and making sure everyone know about this......" Again, why do you keep "predicting" what I am going to say? Earlier you said: "I mean you can give an example of certain African or Muslim countries..." so why are you seemingly "preempting" words or actions that I have never actually spoken about or done?
    1
  22526.  @宋庆-i4m  "clearly don't know enough about certain things...you still can't marry the person of the same sex in Taipei because they still haven't ratified the law to allow this" Same-sex marriage in Taiwan province became legal on 24 May 2019.
    1
  22527.  @宋庆-i4m  In 2019 there were 2,011 same-sex female marriages and 928 same-sex male marriages in Taiwan province. In 2020, there were 1,713 same-sex female marriages and 674 same-sex male marriages in the Chinese province of Taiwan.
    1
  22528.  @宋庆-i4m  Admittedly, it was a close one. I would have to find another strategy had you asked this question before 2019.
    1
  22529.  @宋庆-i4m  Well, in my first post, I did state that "in many states in the U.S, it's illegal to walk around in public with a open bottle/can of alcoholic beverage in hand." so you didn't really mention anything that wasn't in my original statement.
    1
  22530.  @宋庆-i4m  "神州 Shenzhou So China (mainland) would recognized my marriage as a same sex person just because I got married in Taiwan?" Did you really get a same-sex marriage in Taiwan?
    1
  22531.  @宋庆-i4m  You got a same-sex marriage in Taiwan province, yet you're claiming Taiwan doesn't allow same-sex marriages?
    1
  22532.  @宋庆-i4m  I have heard that in Beijing, foreign expats who are same-sex partners can be granted dependent residency status.
    1
  22533.  @宋庆-i4m  In 2013, beginning on 1 July, foreign same-sex partners (including married couples) of current residents became eligible for residency status in Beijing under a "dependent resident status". This law only applies to the municipality of Beijing. The key beneficiaries were expected to be white-collar foreign expats whose partners and spouses were able to accompany them and gain residency status in Beijing as a result of the law.
    1
  22534.  @宋庆-i4m  In a landmark decision, lawmakers in Taiwan have legalised same-sex marriage on the island, the first place ever to do so in Asia. Lawmakers voted 66 to 27 to approve a Bill that would allow same-sex couples to form "exclusive permanent unions", and apply for marriage registration at government agencies. Watch the YouTube Video: Taiwan becomes first in Asia to legalise same-sex marriage (By Channel News Asia)
    1
  22535.  @宋庆-i4m  You said: "This law only applies to foreigners and not Chinese citizens" but aren't you a foreigner yourself? So when you asked whether you can get married to a person of same sex and whether Beijing will recognise your marriage, the answer is yes, Beijing will recognise a foreign expats same sex marriage.
    1
  22536.  @宋庆-i4m  So you're Chinese and your straight, then what's the point of this conversation then? I've already cited much information to substanciate my point and answer your questions as best I can, whereas you can't seem to refute my points.
    1
  22537.  @宋庆-i4m  Look, throughout this comment thread, you have been constantly asking about you getting married to your same sex partner and now you're claiming that you're asking for other people? Who is this other people then? You can just change your question and move the goal post, long after I have since answered your question and scored the goal?
    1
  22538.  @宋庆-i4m  I've already answered that you can get a same sex marriage in China, you'll just have to get married in Taiwan province that's all. I've long answered the your question, but you just change your question to asking whether the mainland recognise this same-sex marriage, that means you're moving the goal post long after I have scored.
    1
  22539.  @宋庆-i4m  Look, you claimed that your asking for other people, then who is this other people? Are they foreigners? Then I have long answered your question, but you just keep changing the question even after I have answered it, then you're clearly moving the goal post that's all.
    1
  22540.  @宋庆-i4m  So you've admitted that I have long answered your question, then why are you constantly changing the goal post after I have scored? It gives me less of an incentive to answer you questions, given that you can just modify it just like that. And since you're Chinese and straight then who's this other person that you're asking for?
    1
  22541.  @宋庆-i4m  Look, this is what you wrote previously: "神州 Shenzhou Can I get married in China if I am Gay?" "the question was can I still get married as a gay person in China?" And I have answered yes, even if you are gay, you can still take a woman as a wife and get married in China. China allows gay men to get married normally with female wives, since that's the normal definition of marriage. Next you wrote: "神州 Shenzhou Can you marry the person of the same sex as you in China?" ""can you marry a person of the same sex in China?" "Can you marry the person of the same-sex in China? can a man marry man? can a women marry a women?" And I have answered yes, you can marry a person of the same sex in China, you just have to travel to Taipei to register your marriage if you want to marry someone of the same gender as you in China. ... So I have long answered your incessant questions then why do you constantly keep on moving the goal post? I've already scored several times, but you just keep moving the goal post. And you've already admitted that you're straight, so why are you even asking this question at all then?
    1
  22542.  @宋庆-i4m  "神州 Shenzhou .....I don't need to personally know any black people or be Black in the US to talk about racial injustice in the US do I?" This is precisely the sort of Social Justice Warrior (SJW) behavior that's entrenching itself in Western discourse.
    1
  22543.  @宋庆-i4m  So you acknowledged that you've been moving the goal post all this while, even after I've scored and answered your questions so many times. Then why should I continue to answer your incessant questions, when all you do is move the goalpost time and time again?
    1
  22544.  @宋庆-i4m  Well, if you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China according to their constitution.
    1
  22545.  @宋庆-i4m  So are you a non-Chinese citizen? If so, then since you're not a Chinese citizen and you are straight, then what's the whole point of this discussion about whether you can get married in China as a gay person? I mean, I've pretty much answered all your questions, yet you just keep on shifting the goal post again and again, then why should I continue to answer your incessant questions?
    1
  22546.  @宋庆-i4m  Well, then if you disregard the Republic of China 🇹🇼 constitution, then that means you pretty much acknowledged the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 constitution, in which case, Taiwan is also part of China. Under the 1992 Consensus, both ROC and PRC recognize Taiwan as part of China, as well as many major countries in the world like the USA, UK, Australia, Canada, EU countries, and so on. Whether you choose to accept ROC's or PRC's constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  22547.  @宋庆-i4m  Do you understand the difference between "moving the goalpost" and "changing the topic"? Moving the goal post means changing the parameters of your original question. Like how after I have answered your previous question of "Can I get married in China if I am Gay?", I answered yes you can get married to a woman, even if you are a gay man, since that's the normal definition of marriage. You then move the goal post to "Can you marry the person of the same sex as you in China?" and I answered yes, as long as you get married in Taipei. That's what it means to move the goal post. Changing the topic is when you change the topic altogether, like when you wanted to discuss Taipei and a different topic altogether. You said: "now you acknowledge that you can't based that Taiwan is part of the PRC based on an invalid constitution." What invalid constitution? I never said that the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 constitution is invalid, and PRC's constitution does state that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China. However, earlier you did say that the Republic of China 🇹🇼 constitution is invalid. You said: "So now Taiwan is now part of the PRC now since the the 1992 consensus?" In the 1992 consensus, both ROC and PRC agree that there is only One China, and that Taiwan is a part of China. Not only that, even major countries like the United States recognize Taiwan as part of China, since the 1972 Shanghai Communique. According to an 2017 article in The Diplomat: The Shanghai Communique: An American Foreign Policy Success, 45 Years Later On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia. The Vietnam War was still raging when the Communique was signed but there has been no major war in the Asia-Pacific since that time. The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position.
    1
  22548.  @宋庆-i4m  Why should I find the part where you said you were a foreigner? I never said you said you were a foreigner.
    1
  22549.  @宋庆-i4m  You said: "SO YES YOU DID SAY I WAS A FOREIGNER" Yes, but that's actually me asking a question: "but aren't you a foreigner yourself?". And the second part: "The answer is yes" is a followup to whether you answered that you're a foreigner. Furthermore, those are my words, but I never said you said you were a foreigner. Look, you previously asked me: "神州 Shenzhou Yes, but where was the part where I mentioned I was a foreigner?" and "Again please find the part where I said I was a foreigner???" .. But once again, why should I find the part where you said you were a foreigner? I never said you said you were a foreigner, even the words you quoted is just me asking whether you're a foreigner or not, not me saying you said you were a foreigner.
    1
  22550.  @宋庆-i4m  "So the CPC and PRC has been in charge of Taiwan since 1992?" China is special in that the mainland government need not be in charge of a region, yet the region is still considered part of China. For example, Hong Kong has their own separate government different from the mainland, yet after the 1997 return, Hong Kong today is part of China under the One Country, Two Systems policy. China is the only country in the world that allows multiple political systems existing within our borders. The fact remains that Taiwan's constitution says that Taiwan is part of China and both the mainland and Taiwan agree that Taiwan is part of China under the One China Policy. As with the 1972 Shanghai Communique, even the United States of America recognize that Taiwan is part of China and the US does not challenge that position.
    1
  22551. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  22552. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  22553. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  22554. Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  22555. According to its own constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  22556. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  22557. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its own constitution.
    1
  22558. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  22559. wwmm cc You want Democracy and No War in the world? China is currently at peace since our last major war 30 years ago in 1979, but countries like USA still waging war in Middle East, even in 21st century, in order to cut off the countries' heads (Muammar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, etc) for the sake of "democracy"
    1
  22560. Gotham1984 There have only been 100 or so Tibetans self-immolating themselves since 2009. Why don't you look at India, where as many as 1,451 and 1,584 self-immolations have been reported in 2000 and 2001, respectively? You mean because 100 Tibetans self-immolate, then entire population of 3,000,000 people in Tibet, must give in to their demands? What makes you think Uighur Muslims aren't allowed to have beards? Here is a video about a Canadian guy (The Food Ranger) visiting Kashgar in Xinjiang and you can see many of the Uighur men sporting beards. Video:Muslim Street Food in China youtube.com/watch?v=c1x19gySa-s Falun Gong was only formed in 1994 (25 years ago) by Li Hongzhi, who was a charismatic figure that led people to believe he was a god and could cure cancer. His followers who had early stage cancer, refused to seek actual medical treatment and instead donated their savings to him, in hopes of curing their disease. Its more like a cult than an actual religion. It hijacked existing practices from Qigong, Taoism and Buddhist philosophies and then claims to be a religion when all those other practices have thousands of years of history, compared to Falun Gong's 25 years. Rohingya Crisis is because of Myanmar/Burma government, yet you want to pin the blame on China? And China is only doing business in those countries. In world of business, not all business transactions will result in profit, but the point remains that nobody force those countries to do business with China if they don't want to. They can always choose to break off business with China, and nobody going to stop them. China has built much infrastructure in countries like Pakistan, Kazakhstan, other -stan countries, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Maldives, and also in African countries like Kenya, Angola, Djibouti, Nigeria, etc. And China is not at war other countries currently, like what USA is doing in Middle East. Why not USA spend money investing in Middle East, instead of waging war?
    1
  22561. Gotham1984 I watched some Western media like CNN, Fox News, BBC, etc, and they tend to portray China as currency manipulators, with Chinese people stealing American jobs, and about what happen if China and USA go to war and about starting possible trade war. But if you watch Chinese media like CGTN or New China TV, they tend to talk about how China can promote better economic cooperation with the West. So why should I believe what Western media has to say? You tell me not to bother with long replies, when you yourself begin with an entire paragraph against me? What sort of unfair double standards is this? You talk about all these internal social issues in China, but is it the same as USA bombing Middle East in the name of democracy? Isn't that what my first post is all about?
    1
  22562. Sinophobic sentiment in the West is being fueled by the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of being overrun by Asians) mindset.
    1
  22563.  Lynn Michael  America is actually dependent on medical masks that are mostly Made in China and the USA urgently needs our masks during this difficult period. Source: The U.S. Needs China’s Masks, as Acrimony Grows nytimes.com/2020/03/23/business/coronavirus-china-masks.html American front-line medical personnel are running desperately short of masks and protective equipment as they battle the coronavirus outbreak. China, already the world’s largest producer of such gear by far, has ramped up factory output and is now signaling that it wants to help.
    1
  22564.  @Jayzylyn  Which videos of Chinese workers intentionally stepping on face masks? You're always welcome to buy Made in India masks instead. Video: Making Masks India Coronavirus youtu.be/KFziEl_GW18 Video: Face mask manufacturing in India? youtu.be/--pwI4E9tsk
    1
  22565. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  22566. According to its own constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  22567. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  22568. Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  22569. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China and this fact is acknowledged by countries all over the world.
    1
  22570. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  22571. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  22572.  @billyehh  "It may be cultural differences, but I have an ethical problem with the idea of buying brides." China doesn't really care about how you feel about the idea of buying brides. As long as it solves the problem of shortage of women, then why are you upset?
    1
  22573.  @billyehh  The One Child Policy actually help propelled China out of poverty. Previously. China was suffering from high population problems like high infant mortality, high child malnutrition, high illiteracy rate. Because poor families in China had multiple mouths to feed, so they couldn't afford to feed everyone, or send them to hospital or send them all to school. So the solution was to restrict families to having a single child, meaning that the parents pool their resources into raising a healthy kid and sending him to school, rather than spreading the family money over raising multiple kids. As a result, China's poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015, as measured by the percentage of people living on the equivalent of US$1.90 or less per day in 2011 purchasing price parity terms, which still stands in 2022. ... Source: Wikipedia: Poverty in China.
    1
  22574.  @billyehh  You said: "If you want a 20 year old worker, you had to start 21 years ago." China is switching to automation to make up for a declining workforce. China is already the world's largest market for automation, and China even has Asia's first fully automated port in Qingdao, that is more efficient and is able to operate 24/7 (even at night in complete darkness) in loading/unloading operations.
    1
  22575.  @billyehh  Another possible solution to population decline is to recruit overseas Chinese back to China. China is experiencing what's called a "reverse brain drain". Instead of a brain drain where intellectuals travel from a developing country to a developed country, China is experiencing the reverse as overseas Chinese return to the homeland. Since 2013, more than 80% of Chinese students abroad have chosen to return home each year. That’s up from an average of 25% for the period between 1978 and 2007. China has also begun aggressively recruiting international scientists with perks including funding of up to 800,000 yuan ($116,000) annually.
    1
  22576.  @billyehh  My point is that India did not implement any One Child Policy, yet like China, India has an imbalanced gender ratio. So One Child Policy was not responsible for the gender imbalance, since another of the world's most populous country, India also had a skewed gender imbalance ratio.
    1
  22577.  @billyehh  Money is being paid to the families of those brides, to help them lift themselves out of poverty. And lonely Chinese men can get married and have kids, helping ease the population problems and gender imbalance, then isn't this a good arrangement to the benefit of both parties?
    1
  22578.  @billyehh  Machines may be expensive but at least China has the wealth to afford to purchase them. China's market is still growing, since like I said earlier, if China can transform our 1.4 billion people into consumers ourselves, then China would be the world's largest market (if we aren't already). Machines need skilled people to maintain them and that's where recruiting overseas Chinese comes into play. When they return home, overseas Chinese bring with them a wealth of knowledge from overseas (and perhaps some advanced technology as well). Also, programming and maintenance probably takes a few days up to a week, but once its completed, the machines can run for many months (even years) until its next service date. Machines do not consume that's true. but China can always found new markets elsewhere. China is developing countries in Central Asia, Africa and Latin America, and as the middle class grows in those countries, it would create a demand for Chinese goods.
    1
  22579.  @billyehh  "however it is a one time shot in the arm at the cost of decimating future generations." Like I said earlier, there's always future solutions, such as buying brides to make up for the shortage of women, or recruiting overseas Chinese or switching to automation to replace the declining workforce. Had China not implement a One Child Policy, then it's possible that China would never have lifted millions out of poverty through pooling capital into raising a single, healthy child and getting him into school. Having a Two Child Policy might not have been as effective. Back then, Chinese families were poor, so having two mouths to feed represents a bigger burden than instead of having a single child for both parents to raise. Also, two child families might not have the means to send both their kids to school. Especially given Chinese culture, it would be preferred to send boys to school rather than girls. So a one-child policy with a daughter would have given her the chance to attend school, than if it were two-child with a son and a daughter. As a result, China's adult literacy rate grew from 79% in 1982 to 97% in 2020. Today, China's adult literacy rate is at 99%. ... Source: Statista: Adult literacy rate in China from 1982 to 2020
    1
  22580.  @billyehh  According to an article in The Conversation: Estimates from Xinhua News Agency indicate that there are over 100,000 Vietnamese women in China who are married to Chinese men. That far outpaces the number of foreign women from other countries who are married to Chinese men. An estimated 7,000 brides in China come from Cambodia, for example. ... Source: The Conversation: Matching Vietnamese brides with Chinese men, marriage brokers find good business – and sometimes love ... The author's research indicates that around 50% of couples report being happily married.
    1
  22581.  @intothewrx  In the past, Hong Kong was once a prosperous port city under authoritarian British colonial rule, while the mainland was still dirt-poor at that time. However, fortunes have reversed today and Hong Kong has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan and is facing increasing levels of competition from other upcoming mainland port cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian. Source: Wikipedia: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports Source: Wikipedia: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage#2012%E2%80%932017 No wonder why the people of Hong Kong feel like they are being left behind as mainland cities start surpassing Hong Kong.
    1
  22582.  @amoszhang1309  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  22583. Turkey is only wanted in NATO for its military strength, but apparently Turkey isn't welcomed in the EU, after being on the waiting list for 20 years.
    1
  22584.  @thenutbrothers8726  The Chinese government collects DNA samples, fingerprints, iris scans, and blood samples from Uighurs, because they need to know the health condition of the Uighurs and the way to do that is to acquire blood samples and test their medical fitness. If they are suffering from some undeclared diseases, but refuse to tell the doctors, then doing blood tests is one way to find out any ailments that the Uighurs are suffering from.
    1
  22585. Africa is a continent rich in natural resources (which is why other countries invest in it, in the first place) but unless Africans learn to actually harness the resources for themselves, most of it will remain locked away and inaccessible, and Africa's potential will remain untapped. Just my thoughts is all.
    1
  22586. Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when Mongolians conquered both Tibet and Song dynasty China, and made Tibet part of Yuan dynasty China. Tibet broke free of China in 1911, but was reincorporated back after signing the 17 Point Agreement for Peaceful Liberation of Tibet in 1951. India and China relations were good, right until Indian PM Nehru provided asylum to 14th Dalai Lama, who was wanted fugitive by the Chinese goverment. If New Delhi had wanted to develop better relations with Beijing, then it would have simply turned the Dalai Lama over to Beijing, instead of allowing 14th DL to create Tibetan Government in Exile. Why blame China, when it is India providing asylum to 14th DL here?
    1
  22587. -Gautama Buddha was born in what constitutes modern day Nepal, not India. -Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, and Tibet broke free of China in 1912 but rejoined in 1951. There is even a legal agreement signed by Dalai Lama (called 17th point agreement) acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. -Prior to the 1962 Sino-Indian war, Chinese premier Zhou Enlai wanted to negotiate our border dispute with India, and proposed the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence 和平共处五项原则 to define China-India relations. But PM Nehru refused negotiations, and pursued his aggressive 'Forward' Policy of building military bases along our disputed border. -If Indians really think that POK belongs to them, then why don't you take it back from Pakistan? Why not hold a plebiscite to the people of Kashmir and let them decide for themselves if they want to be part of India or Pakistan?
    1
  22588.  @CHINESE_PRIDE  How is China dependent upon the West? China is literally the factory of the world, and Western countries get their stuff from China.
    1
  22589.  @CHINESE_PRIDE  "If CCP continus to strain relations, China is guaranteed to collapse." Western journalists have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2022, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western journalist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for 30 years already?
    1
  22590.  Anonymous Panacea  "The US is a hypocrite but so is china." How is China a hypocrite? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the U.S represents a threat to global peace and stability.
    1
  22591.  @CHINESE_PRIDE  How is China dependent upon the West? China makes stuff that the West needs.
    1
  22592.  Anonymous Panacea  Does China claim to be a bastion of human rights like the United States? Then how is China being a hypocrite, you tell me?
    1
  22593.  @CHINESE_PRIDE  "If CCP continus to strain relations, China is guaranteed to collapse." It's the Western MSM that continually paints a negative image of China to their audiences here.
    1
  22594. Here's a short 2-min video of the beautiful night view of 11 Chinese cities in China. Video: 中国大陆11座城市美丽夜景 Beautiful Night View of 11 Chinese cities in 2 Minutes youtu.be/mzR8Scsd33g (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  22595.  @ขวดงึก-ฏ6ษ  Beijing is China's capital full of historical monuments like The Great Wall of China, Forbidden City, Summer Palace, Temple of Heaven, as well as modern architecture like National Stadium, National Grand Theatre, CCTV Headquarters, Galaxy SOHO, and so on. Here's a short 4-min video of Beijing. Video: A Glance at Beijing youtu.be/-UuJxmU6OCQ (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  22596.  @ScottTangents  China has Pakistan and North Korea that we can always depend upon
    1
  22597. While the US sees a zero sum game, China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain.
    1
  22598.  @brian2221  Indeed. Brian doesn't even need to waste time on an intro to his video, he just jumps straight into the topic at hand.
    1
  22599.  @scarlettwill  Rust on the casing could be due to poor maintenance of the missile prior to its launch. There is no furrow or scorched marks in the earth, because the Tochka-U missile casing detaches from the cluster warhead (which explodes in mid air, to rain down deadly shrapnel) in mid-flight and falls to the ground.
    1
  22600. @Madhur Gupta "神州 Shenzhou wumao, wikipedia is banned in China LOL" Who says Wikipedia is banned in China? Nobody will arrest you if you access Wikipedia while in China.
    1
  22601. @Madhur Gupta I googled "Wikipedia in China" and it does not say Wikipedia is banned in China. Where does it say so? Likewise where doe it say Google is banned in China?
    1
  22602. @bd z "We got world's smartest quantum computing system far ahead of ur 5G by decades." Chinese scientists have built quantum computing machine that is 24,000 times faster than its international counterparts and 10-100 times faster than the first electronic computer, ENIAC. Source: World's First Quantum Computer Made By China, 24,000 Times Faster Than International Counterparts fossbytes.com/worlds-first-quantum-computer-made-by-china/
    1
  22603. China should follow our own path to success, instead of just blindly copying the West's decline.
    1
  22604. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  22605. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  22606. 觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  22607.  @obamapower3100  About Communism versus Capitalism, it's no secret today that Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the planet. Yet we still have starving people, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking healthcare, because in capitalistic societies, the goods go to the people with money. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." The Earth's resources are finite and capitalism seeks to exhaust it's resources in reckless pursuit of profits, whereas communism is dedicated to distributing resources according to needs.
    1
  22608.  @xihuantiyu  Those Hong Kong student protestors haven't even graduated from school yet they already think they know how to best govern Hong Kong? Their teenage minds haven't even matured and they haven't even stepped out into the real working world of adults, yet they already think they know how politics work in real world?
    1
  22609.  @eedragonr1576  They are sacrificing their bright futures for what? These idealistic Hong Kong kids have been raised in cloistered environment of education, perfect theories and textbook ideals, and they are now trying to apply what they learnt directly to the real world. But they haven't even stepped in the real working world of adults, yet they think they know how to best govern Hong Kong?
    1
  22610.  @dziku2222  You're claiming that China is "short-sighted" but the Chinese government has produced 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, etc, to map out China's direction in the future. Our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. How's that being shortsighted/degenerated?
    1
  22611.  @Mr-hn2bp  Agreed. China has a literacy rate of 99% in 2021, while the United States has a literacy rate of 79% in 2022, meaning that a fifth of Americans are in fact, not literate.
    1
  22612. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  22613.  @Mr-hn2bp  "America is the only major developed society where the average income of the bottom 50 percent has gone down over a 30-year period. By contrast, in the past 40 years the Chinese people have experienced a greater improvement in their standard of living than they have experienced in 4,000 years." - Kishore Mabubani, political commentator.
    1
  22614.  @Mr-hn2bp  In fact, China has a higher literacy rate than America.
    1
  22615.  @tooltalk  What makes you claim that the CPC forced Chinese into poverty in the first place? China was plunged into poverty as a result of the Century of Humiliation. During the 19th Century, Britain waged two wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them which depleted China's reserves. Then there was the ransacking of the Summer Palace by the West, and that's how Chinese artefacts ended up on display in Western museums. There was the Boxer Rebellion where 8 nations formed an alliance to invade China and loot our wealth. China was fined war reparations of 450,000,000 taels of fine silver to the West. Yet you think it was the CPC that made China poor?
    1
  22616.  @tooltalk  What makes you claim that the CPC forced Chinese into poverty in the first place? China was plunged into poverty as a result of the Century of Humiliation.
    1
  22617. China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain. Whereas the US only sees a zero sum game.
    1
  22618.  @Thundercnut  I think it's blatantly obvious who was behind Nordstream, what do they know that I don't?
    1
  22619. ​ @b3arwithm3  China was among the first countries to detect the mysterious illness and report it to the World Health Organization, as well as shutting down cities to curb the spread.
    1
  22620.  @honoraryamerica5943  I agree with your point that contrary to Cyrus' former comment from one of his videos, "the world needs LESS Canada, not more". Canada needs to first free itself from the U.S orbit, if they want to think about contributing globally. Otherwise, whatever Canada does would only be furthering the U.S interests at the expense of its own. Just like with the Meng Wanzhou fiasco.
    1
  22621. These HK kids haven't even graduted from school, or stepped out into the real working world of adults, yet they already gotten swept up by idealistic political fervor.
    1
  22622.  @educateyourself3872  How will Vietnam and India ship their goods across the Pacific Ocean to the USA? It is China's infrastructure (roads, railways and ports) that make China attractive for manufacturing. China is home to the busiest ports in the world that ship out tonnes of cargo to other places. List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage 1. Ningbo-Zhoushan (China) – 1,261,340 kilotons 2.Tangshan (China) – 768,870 kilotons 3. Shanghai (China) – 727,770 kilotons 4. Qingdao (China) – 657,540 kilotons 5. Guangzhou (China) – 655,920 kilotons 6. Singapore (Singapore) – 578,190 kilotons 7. Suzhou (China) – 572,760 kilotons 8. Rizhao (China) – 570,570 kilotons 9. Port Hedland (Australia) – 566,210 kilotons 10. Tianjin (China) – 549,020 kilotons ...
    1
  22623.  @educateyourself3872  You said: "It’s no problem to build or utilize extra ports in other countries especially if it saves money in the long run on shipping costs." Which other country's ports could save them money? Answer: China, since Chinaese ports handle enormous amounts of cargo every day. You said: "Additionally, these countries will offer incentives like tax breaks to drum up the business." That's what China is doing, how else are they going to compete?
    1
  22624.  @educateyourself3872  You said: "Lastly, companies won’t have to deal with the political risk that China would suddenly decide to shut down the shipping." What makes you think Vietnam or India won't decide to suddenly shut down the shipping? "Additionally, the AI is here, all that has to be done is for the robotics to catch up and it won’t matter how many people a country has to make things cheap." China is already the world's largest market for robotics and automation. Also, China has a huge lead in AI development so again what advantage does Vietnam or India have over China in these two fields?
    1
  22625. Agree with your statement. Just need to point out it's the CPC not the CCP. The name of the party in Chinese is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) in which Zhōngguó (中国) means China i.e the Middle Kingdom. So it's the CPC not the CCP.
    1
  22626.  @niyarao2962  The US report says 45 casualties from Chinese side, it doesn’t explicitly said they were killed.
    1
  22627.  @niyarao2962  You don't even know how many were killed, the USA only stated 43 casualties that's all. Why don't you Indians settle your border dispute with Nepal instead of starting another with China? Video: 1 Indian killed, 4 injured after Nepal police fired near border area with Bihar youtu.be/SFW4-ViJ0_o
    1
  22628.  Priya Jaya  You Indians love Chinese products like smartphones such as _Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, etc. Xiaomi was started in 2010. Today it's one of the world's most popular smartphones. In India, it's number one. Video: How Xiaomi broke out of China to go global | CNBC Reports youtu.be/291DlKa7iIU
    1
  22629. Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands, just ask the expats here. However, many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly viewing Chinese in their lands as unwelcome.
    1
  22630.  @flamacue  Hong Kong will eventually be fully returned back to China by 2047 anyway, once the Sino-British declaration finally expires after 50 years. Chinese government is patient and there's no need to lift a finger and eventually Hong Kong will eventually be reunified with the mainland in the future. It is inevitable.
    1
  22631. @Pub Comrad Exactly what hlwonka 878 said. I remember the USA purposely bombed the People's Republic of China embassy in Belgrade, killing 3 Chinese journalists, and injuring 27 people, yet China did not retaliate against the USA for their bombing.
    1
  22632.  @feverpitchxx  That's in accordance with Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條) which states the following: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." - Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 Therefore, the Central People's Government (i.e. Beijing) reserves the right to appoint the Hong Kong Chief Executive and Beijing is not breaking any laws by doing so. Hong Kong is still a democracy because Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections and the candidates are voted in by Hong Kong people.
    1
  22633. China supports 20% of world population with only 7% arable land and still have surplus food for export, making China among world's largest exporter of agricultural produce.
    1
  22634. What's the name of this Hague Tribunal that did the ruling on the South China Sea?
    1
  22635.  @rapfaelezio6282  There's so many courts in the Hague, which Hague Tribunal is the one that made the ruling on the South China Sea?
    1
  22636.  @rapfaelezio6282  So you can't even name the Hague Tribunal that ruled on the South China Sea? Then why should China observe such a ruling?
    1
  22637.  @eugeneromero6583  China actually has an annual fishing ban on South China Sea waters lasting from 1st May to 1st Sept, in order to allow the fishes to replenish themselves.
    1
  22638.  @banaterist  Philippines maritime boundary is drawn up in the 1898 Treaty of Paris, which DOES NOT include the South China Sea Islands as within Philippine territory. (Source: Wikipedia: File: Ph boundary in Treaty of Paris 1898)
    1
  22639. China Uncensored never says anything that would put China in a positive light to its viewers. It turns out that CU is sponsored by Falun Dafa media.
    1
  22640. China is among the first to extend congratulations to Putin on his reelection. While Russia has just successfully completed its election, Ukraine decided it will not be holding any elections this year. Makes one wonder whose the real democracy.
    1
  22641. China doesn't have to give anything to North Korea or offer a better deal than South Korea and USA. North Korea is not threatening Chinese cities, and trade with China is essential for N. Korea's survival. The missile crisis is primarily between N. Korea, S. Korea and USA, not China, and China is at the most, a mediator for these countries to settle their conflicts. Otherwise, why is the destination of Kim's first overseas visit Beijing, instead of Washington or Seoul? Answer:Because China is more important to N. Korea than any S. Korea or USA.
    1
  22642. Why would Chinese want to kill ourselves over this? Look, at Japan (and Korea) suicide rates and even without social credit, those people are committing seppukku (don't know the Korean equivalent)
    1
  22643. +Mike Invader If you really think Chinese people are model citizens, then personally I think that is a wonderful thing and it should be you foreigners that are striving to become model citizens as well. Why instruct us Chinese to become bad citizens then? If you Westerners always think that you are right, everyone else is wrong, then how is the country ever going to progress?
    1
  22644. +Frank Castle Is Dead Speaking of Saudi Arabia, why your USA is such good allies with a country with such big human rights issues? Under Saudi Arabian laws, they don't even allow women to drive! yet the USA ignores this basic violation and continues to criticize China for our "freedoms"? At least in China women can drive, so how is China's human rights violations worst than Saudia Arabia's. Because USA needs the oil? Look even President Trump stood up for the Saudi Arabian's crown prince and ignored his involvment in the murder of a journalist. Source: Trump 'stands with' Saudi Arabia and defends crown prince over Khashoggi theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/20/trump-saudi-arabia-jamal-khashoggi-crown-prince
    1
  22645.  @zackk4393  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"? Video: Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' youtu.be/DPt-zXn05ac
    1
  22646.  @zackk4393  But according to Wikipedia: A Madman's Diary, the diary form was inspired by Nikolai Gogol's short story "Diary of a Madman", as was the idea of the madman who sees reality more clearly than those around him. It's a work of fiction, not based on a true story.
    1
  22647.  @zackk4393  Synopsis: The story was inspired from a fiction entitled “Diary of a madman” written by Nikolai Gogol in 1834. As the title suggests, the story outlines a diary written by a madman. The allegory was conveyed by a first-person narrator. source:wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Madman%27s_Diary#Synopsis
    1
  22648.  @tooltalk  "china = cheap" Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that the cost of living in America is kept to a minimum. Think about the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursuits like cars, housing, luxury brands, school fees, tuition fees and so on. Isn't that why many Americans flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money?
    1
  22649.  vi bist  Here's a video of African Shaolin Monks learning Chinese Kung Fu at the Shaolin Monastery in China. Which Western country treat Africans with such respect as Chinese? Video: Africans at the Shaolin Temple to Learn Kung Fu youtu.be/Kx42t7kBNXA
    1
  22650. The difference is that Solomon Islands is a sovereign nation, whereas Ukraine isn't a sovereign nation ever since the 2014 coup de'tat ousting President Yanukovych and installing U.S puppet into Kiev.
    1
  22651.  @truthseekerodinson5094  A country is not sovereign if they are being controlled by another country. The 2014 vote to remove Viktor Yanukovych from his presidential post by parliament members had garnered 328 votes in favor. But according to Ukraine's constitution, a 3/4 majority vote (i.e at least 338 votes in favor) is required to remove Yanukovych, so the vote was still short of 10. Yet Yanukovych was removed regardless, and the democratic procedure had not been carried out properly. "Were that the case you'd see Ukrainians fighting as hard for the "US puppet regime" as the Afghanistan army did for their US puppet regime." It's a comparison of apples and oranges here. The U.S overtly took over Afghan government and installed democratic institutions in Afghanistan, whereas in Ukraine, it was covertly achieved through the use of local actors. So of course the Afghans see the Americans as occupiers, whereas such a thing is absent in Ukraine.
    1
  22652.  @matthewburgess1406  "神州 Shenzhou maybe because China has directly threatened Australia with ballistic and nuclear warheads over some comments about the treatment of the Uyghur people" Australia choose to purchase nuclear submarines from the United States through the AUKUS deal (snubbing France in the process), so if Australia is willing to buy nuclear subs, then obviously Australia will become potential targets for nuclear strikes. China did not threaten Australia, all we did is point out this fact. If Australia don't want a giant nuclear target painted on themselves, then don't buy nuclear subs that's all. Simple right? And what makes you think Australia cares about Uighurs? Australian soldiers committed war crimes against Muslims in Afghanistan, yet they suddenly care about Muslims in China?
    1
  22653.  @matthewburgess1406  "神州 Shenzhou maybe because China has directly threatened Australia with ballistic and nuclear warheads over some comments about the treatment of the Uyghur people" Australia is literally buying nuclear submarines through the AUKUS deal with US. (snubbing France in the process), making Australia a potential target for nuclear strikes. China did not threaten Australia, all we did is point out this fact. If Australia don't want a giant nuclear target painted on themselves, then just don't buy nuclear subs is all. And what makes you think Australia cares about Uighurs? Australian soldiers committed war crimes against Muslims in Afghanistan, yet they suddenly care about Muslims in China?
    1
  22654.  @matthewburgess1406  "神州 Shenzhou nuclear powered subs not nuclear weapons!" Nuclear powered subs are the first step into getting nuclear weapons. Where is Australia going to procure their nuclear fuel from you tell me? Can you guarantee that Australia will not try to convert those nuclear fuel into weapons-grade materials? "So only China is allowed to have nuclear submarines?? So only China is allowed to build up they're military strength??" Did I ever said that or suggest anything like that? "And saying that purchasing nuclear submarines makes you a nuclear target is a threat!" Simply tell Australia to Don't Buy Nuclear Subs! if they don't want a nuclear target painted on their back. Problem solved!
    1
  22655.  @matthewburgess1406  "神州 Shenzhou btw nuclear powered subs are the only practical way to patrol the waters of Australia," But it comes at the cost of making Australia a potential target for nuclear attacks when they acquire nuclear submarines. If Australia doesn't want such trouble, then simply don't buy nuclear subs that's all.
    1
  22656.  @truthseekerodinson5094  I cited several organizations pegging Ukraine as not a democracy, but a hybrid regime (i.e Freedom House, Economist Intelligence Unit) but it's like you have no counterargument to point out how Ukraine is democratic. Even the jailing of opposition members like Viktor Medvedchuk in Ukraine happened in 2021, so this was even before the Russian special military operation began in 2022. Then how exactly is Ukraine a democracy? And the 2014 removal of President Yanukovych through voting by Ukraine parliament members was 10 votes short of the 3/4 majority needed to impeach/remove Yanukovych as president, so the democratic transfer of power in Ukraine has not been adhered to since 2014.
    1
  22657.  @truthseekerodinson5094  I cited several organizations pegging Ukraine as not a democracy, but a hybrid regime (i.e Freedom House, Economist Intelligence Unit) but it's like you have no counterargument to point out how Ukraine is democratic. Even the jailing of opposition members like Viktor Medvedchuk in Ukraine happened in 2021, so this was even before the Russian special military operation began in 2022. Then how exactly is Ukraine a democracy?
    1
  22658.  @spafon7799  "The west is jealous of the dictators making deals with China?" Then why is the U.S so against the Solomon Islands making a security deal with China?
    1
  22659.  @truthseekerodinson5094  But I was referring to Ukraine before the Russia's special military operation. Even Democracy Index (by Economist Intelligence Unit) pegged Ukraine as a hybrid regime in 2020. Viktor Medvedchuk was arrested in 2021 too that's before Russia's special military operation in 2022. You said: "In peace-time everyone can speak their truth." Tell that to Edward Snowden and Julian Assange, they get arrested or become fugitives just for speaking the truth. You said: "I do strongly believe that Ukrainians are fighting so hard because they desperately want western-style democracy. It's a difficult goal given their giant neighbour." How is this so? Russia doesn't care about its neighbors (i.e Finland, Lithuania, Estonia, etc) wanting Western-style democracies, but Putin wanted assurance that NATO would not expand eastwards (i.e that Ukraine not be allowed to join NATO). Many NATO countries like France and Germany shared this reluctance to admit Ukraine into NATO (citing concerns over Ukraine government corruption) but they refused to put that down in writing to assure Putin. After realizing that his words had fallen on deaf ears for years, Putin finally decided to act.
    1
  22660.  @truthseekerodinson5094  But I was referring to Ukraine before the Russia's special military operation. Even Democracy Index (by Economist Intelligence Unit) pegged Ukraine as a hybrid regime in 2020. Viktor Medvedchuk was arrested in 2021 too that's before Russia's special military operation in 2022. You said: "In peace-time everyone can speak their truth." Tell that to Edward Snowden and Julian Assange, they get arrested or become fugitives just for speaking the truth. You said: "I do strongly believe that Ukrainians are fighting so hard because they desperately want western-style democracy. It's a difficult goal given their giant neighbour." How is this so? Russia doesn't care about its neighbors (i.e Finland, Lithuania, Estonia, etc) wanting Western-style democracies, but Putin wanted assurance that NATO would not expand eastwards (i.e that Ukraine not be allowed to join NATO)
    1
  22661.  @truthseekerodinson5094  But I was referring to Ukraine before the Russia's special military operation. Even Democracy Index (by Economist Intelligence Unit) pegged Ukraine as a hybrid regime in 2020. Viktor Medvedchuk was arrested in 2021 too that's before Russia's special military operation in 2022. You said: "In peace-time everyone can speak their truth." Tell that to Edward Snowden and Julian Assange, they get arrested or become fugitives just for speaking the truth.
    1
  22662.  @truthseekerodinson5094  You said: "I do strongly believe that Ukrainians are fighting so hard because they desperately want western-style democracy. It's a difficult goal given their giant neighbour." How is this so? Russia doesn't care about its neighbors (i.e Finland, Lithuania, Estonia, etc) wanting Western-style democracies, but Putin wanted assurance that NATO would not expand eastwards (i.e that Ukraine not be allowed to join NATO). Many NATO countries like France and Germany shared this reluctance to admit Ukraine into NATO (citing concerns over Ukraine government corruption) but they refused to put that down in writing to assure Putin. After realizing that his words had fallen on deaf ears for years, Putin finally decided to act.
    1
  22663.  @truthseekerodinson5094  "But if you were faced with the choice of Soviet-level economics combined with forced censorship OR western-like economic growth and freedom of speech, well it's an easy choice." Since you brought up Soviet-level economics, then Ukraine was arguably at it's most prosperous while part of the Soviet Union. In 1946, the Soviet Union introduced the Fourth Five-Year Plan which would prove to be a remarkable success, and can be likened to the "wonders of West German and Japanese reconstruction", but without foreign capital; the Soviet reconstruction is historically an impressive achievement. In the prewar years, 15.9% of the Soviet budget went to Ukraine, in 1950, during the Fourth Five-Year Plan this had increased to 19.3%. The Ukraine workforce had increased from 1.2 million in 1945 to 2.9 million in 1955; an increase of 33.2% over the 1940-level. The result of this remarkable growth was that by 1955, Ukraine was producing 2.2 times more than in 1940, and the republic had become one of the leading producers of certain commodities in Europe. Ukraine was the largest per-capita producer in Europe of pig iron and sugar, and the second-largest per-capita producer of steel and of iron ore, and was the third largest per-capita producer of coal in Europe. All achieved while Ukraine was part of the USSR. But fast forward till today, and Ukraine is arguably the poorest country in Europe after they left the Soviet Union. So the choice is easy, Ukraine should have stuck with the Soviet Union.
    1
  22664.  @truthseekerodinson5094  "1. The Maidan protests. There were millions of protesters during this "revolution of dignity"." During the Revolution of Dignity, while there was 400,000–800,000 protesters in Kiev, there where only about 50,000 in Lviv, 20,000 in Cherkasy, 10,000+ in Ternopil across Ukraine, so how's that millions? "2. The police crackdown in Maidan killed 100s of people." Only about 108 were killed. It's like you're deliberately trying to exaggerate the figures. "4. The reasons why it might be considered a hybrid/non-democratic are Russia-related. In 2010, Yanukovych narrowly beat Yulia Tymoshenko in the presidential election. 1 year later, Yulia is in jail. That's called jailing your political opponents and is super-undemocratic." How is that Russia related? And if you agree jailing political opponents is undemocratic, then why are you giving a pass to the jailing of Viktor Medvedchuk by Zelenskyy? "So it may be correct to label Ukraine as hybrid but that's due to Russian influence over a 20-year period." None of your 5 points actually explain how Russian influence is behind Ukraine being labelled as a hybrid.
    1
  22665.  @truthseekerodinson5094  Does it matter to you what I call the special military operation by Russia? As far as I know, neither Russia nor Ukraine have made any formal declaration of war towards each other, despite all of this. So I don't believe I'm doing anything wrong by using the term special military operation.
    1
  22666.  @matthewburgess1406  "神州 Shenzhou so basically you just admitted China is the aggressor." You have this habit of constantly putting words in my mouth. Did I ever admit that China is the aggressor? China is pointing out that Australia acquiring nuclear subs makes them a potential target for nuclear strikes that's all. Simply Don't Buy Nuclear Subs, if you don't want a nuclear target painted on your back.
    1
  22667.  @matthewburgess1406  "神州 Shenzhou saying don't buy nuclear submarines if you don't want a nuclear target on your back is the same as saying if Australia buys nuclear submarines China will consider using nuclear weapons." Thanks a lot, Captain Obvious, for pointing out what I've been saying all this time. By now, you should have understood the solution to Australia's problem, simply Don't Buy Nuclear Subs if they don't want a nuclear target painted on them. Problem solved!
    1
  22668.  @truthseekerodinson5094  "神州 Shenzhou Listen 50-cent. I'm done with this. You're pushing a mindset not having a conversation. As likely as not, you're paid for your comments." You can't refute my point, so you resort to labeling me a 50-cent? Just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    1
  22669. ​ @petersinclair3997  "神州 Shenzhou Or, China scuttles its nuclear submarines." China is a recognized nuclear nation, party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), so China is able to field nuclear subs. If you want China to scuttle our nuclear subs, you might as well tell every nuclear nation (i.e USA, UK, France, Russia, etc) to do the same. However, Australia is not a nuclear nation, so the AUKUS nuclear sub deal is violating the NPT. Australia could potentially refine the nuclear materials in those submarines to attain weapons-grade nuclear material, and possibly develop nuclear weapons. Because of this possibility, Australia acquiring nuclear subs makes it a potential target for nuclear strikes. The solution has already presented itself, simply Don't Buy Nuclear Subs if Australia doesn't want such a target painted on their backs.
    1
  22670.  @matthewburgess1406  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  22671.  @truthseekerodinson5094  "神州 Shenzhou Listen 50-cent. I'm done with this. You're pushing a mindset not having a conversation. As likely as not, you're paid for your comments." I find it hypocritical of you, that earlier you said that if I "can't call the Russian invasion a war then we're not having a real conversation." Yet now you're accusing me of "pushing a mindset not having a conversation."? When you're literally pushing your mindset onto me here, by forcing me to call it a war? Laughable. And it appears that you can't refute my points logically, so you start labeling me a 50-cent? Just because my views happen to differ from yours
    1
  22672.  @truthseekerodinson5094  I am not naive, I try to support my arguments with facts whenever possible, whereas you just seem to naively believe Ukraine is democracy without proof. I had cited organizations like Freedom House and Democracy Index, labeling Ukraine as not a democracy but a hybrid regime, but you keep insisting that Ukraine is a democracy without proof. Ukrainian opposition media was banned, and opposition leaders like Medvedchuk were arrested even before Russia's special military operation in 2022. But you're somehow justifying it as him being "pro-Russia" then Ukraine is clearly not a democracy if they don't allow opposing viewpoints isn't it? You said: "So, you're a trained pro. Paid to argue in all likelihood." Again with the accusations, do you actually have evidence that I'm a trained pro? And you've been accusing me of trying to push a mindset, when you're the one insisting that I "call the Russian invasion a war" here, so can't you see the hypocrisy of your words? You're basically doing what you are accusing me of doing.
    1
  22673.  @stephenguy3901  "神州 Shenzhou quoting Freedom House ..... Russia is a consolidated authoritarian regime . What have you got to say about that ?" Aren't we talking about Ukraine supposedly being a democracy? The point is that Freedom House pegs Ukraine as a "hybrid regime" what has Russia's system even got to do with this discussion?
    1
  22674.  @stephenguy3901  You said: "that's not true , exactly where and when did the USA threaten to invade the Solomon Islands ?" There's a April 22, 2022 article by Associated Press, entitled: US Warns Solomon Islands of Action Over Pact With China Excerpt: The Biden administration has warned the Solomon Islands that the United States will take unspecified action against the South Pacific nation should its recently concluded cooperation agreement with China pose a threat to U.S. or allied interests.
    1
  22675.  @stephenguy3901  You said: "that's not true , exactly where and when did the USA threaten to invade the Solomon Islands ?" There's an AP article entitled: US Warns Solomon Islands of Action Over Pact With China* The Biden administration has warned the Solomon Islands that the United States will take unspecified action against the South Pacific nation should its recently concluded cooperation agreement with China pose a threat to U.S. or allied interests.
    1
  22676.  @stephenguy3901  You said: "that's not true , exactly where and when did the USA threaten to invade the Solomon Islands ?" Search for an article title: US confirms threat to invade Solomon Islands over China security agreement
    1
  22677.  @stephenguy3901  Pray tell, what is the "unspecified action" that the U.S is going to take against the Solomon Islands then? As for Russia, many people in the West believe the conflict started just over a month ago, when in fact it had been ongoing in Donbas (i.e Donetsk and Luhansk) for 8 years prior. Russia is not starting a war, they are putting an end to one that began since the 2014 coup of Yanukovych and installing a U.S puppet government in Kiev. "Ukraine is a lot closer to being a genuine democracy than Russia will ever be , you are trying to assert Ukraine isn't a democracy yet fail to mention its aggressor , Russia , will never come close to being a democratic country ." The point is whether Ukraine is a democracy or not, and I cited Freedom House and Democracy Index pegging Ukraine as a hybrid regime, then what has whether Russia is a democracy or not even got to do with this? Are you saying that you agree with me that Ukraine is not a democracy according to those organizations? "You also need to stop trying to link to socialist websites" Why can't I link to socialist websites?
    1
  22678.  @stephenguy3901  What is the "unspecified action" that the U.S is going to take against the Solomon Islands then? As for Russia, many people in the West believe the conflict started just over a month ago, when in fact it had been ongoing in Donbas (i.e Donetsk and Luhansk) for 8 years prior. "Ukraine is a lot closer to being a genuine democracy than Russia will ever be , you are trying to assert Ukraine isn't a democracy yet fail to mention its aggressor , Russia , will never come close to being a democratic country ." The point is whether Ukraine is a democracy or not, and I cited Freedom House and Democracy Index pegging Ukraine as a hybrid regime, then what has whether Russia is a democracy or not even got to do with this? Are you saying that you agree with me that Ukraine is not a democracy according to those organizations? "You also need to stop trying to link to socialist websites" Why can't I link to socialist websites?
    1
  22679.  @truthseekerodinson5094  Are you trying to make it sound like "having lots of facts at my finger tips" is somehow wrong? Like earlier you mentioned "Soviet-level economics," but Ukraine was actually at its most prosperous while as part of the Soviet Union. The Soviets poured a fifth of their budget into developing Ukraine, so much such that by 1955 Ukraine was producing 2.2 times more than in 1940, and the republic had become one of the leading producers of certain commodities in Europe. Ukraine was the largest per-capita producer in Europe of pig iron and sugar, and the second-largest per-capita producer of steel and of iron ore, and was the third largest per-capita producer of coal in Europe. All while part of the Soviet Union. Fast forward till today, and if you look up "Europe's Poorest Country", Ukraine frequently pops up.
    1
  22680.  @stephenguy3901  "神州 Shenzhou USA and Australia have options..." That's what I'm asking you, what is the "unspecified action" that the U.S (and Australia) is going to take? Remember the U.S and Australia's involvement in the Afghan War? What makes you think U.S and Australia won't repeat that with the Solomon Islands? "Anyone with sense knows conflict existed in the Donbas region , inflamed by Russian separatists living within Ukraine borders ." Those are Ukrainian citizens who happen to be ethnically Russian and Ukrainian ultra-nationalist neo-Nazis like the Azov Battalion have been shelling civilians in Donbas. According to UN figures, from 2018 to 2021, 81.4% of civilian casualties in the Donbas war came in rebel-held territory. "You called the Zelenski government a US puppet government.." Because Zelenskyy doesn't care about ordinary Ukrainians, he refuses to surrender because Washington want's this conflict to go on for as long as possible. By arming civilians with rifles, he's trying to maximize the number of civilian causalities in Ukraine. "Yes I agree with you Freedom House regards Ukraine as a hybrid democracy " That's hybrid regime, not hybrid democracy, why are you changing the words? "and your reluctance to deny Russia is authoritarian shows you agree with me that Russia has a worse government than Ukraine" How does that make sense? Russia's government actually improved the lives of its civilians, whereas Ukraine is ranked among the poorest countries in Europe for crying out loud. ".... well they have started a war have you not noticed ." But you just admit that the conflict had been ongoing in Donbas for 8 years prior, so how could Russia start something that had been ongoing since 2014? "You can link to socialist websites however..." Even UK news Independent article has the title: US threatens military action if China sets up Solomon Islands base: ‘Would very naturally respond" "Have a think about this , the vast majority of the world is with Ukraine and condemns Putin" China and India are the world's 2 most populous countries, and together with few other countries, we make up more than 50% of the world's population, who either abstained or did not vote against Russia in the United Nations. How can you claim the vast majority of the world is with Ukraine and condemns Putin then?
    1
  22681.  @truthseekerodinson5094  "神州 Shenzhou Yep, you've got all this info at your fingertips except a dictionary which could help you look up the definition of a war." Even as we speak, Russia is literally supplying gas to Ukraine (and EU countries) for crying out loud, how is that considered a war when one side continues to trade and do business with the other? And can't you see your own hypocrisy, when you accused me of trying to push a mindset, when you're the one insisting that I "call the Russian invasion a war"? Isn't this you pushing your mindset onto me here? "You know more than enough to know that democracies ban terrorist organization along with hate speech." By your definition, then Russia is a democracy banning terrorist organizations along with hate speech, is that what your definition of a democracy is?
    1
  22682.  @stephenguy3901  In my final paragraph, I clearly stated that the countries that either abstained or did not vote against Russia in the UN, include China and India, (whom together with much of Africa) our combined population makes up more than 50% of the world's population. Then how can you claim that the vast majority of the world is with Ukraine and condemns Putin?
    1
  22683.  @stephenguy3901  "神州 Shenzhou India is partially free democracy" So India is still a free democracy even if partially, yet they did not condemn Putin. How about you tell me how you arrive at the claim that the vast majority of the world is with Ukraine and condemns Putin, when China and India (and much of Africa) already make up more than 50% of the world's population that did not condemn Putin? Also, I noticed that you ignored all my earlier paragraphs and just focused on my final paragraph in my post, does that mean you agree with my earlier paragraphs?
    1
  22684.  @stephenguy3901  Since we're going on about Ukraine, the Western plan to collapse the Russian ruble has failed. Before the conflict, the ruble was trading at around 70 rubles to 1 USD. The flurry of Western sanctions caused the ruble to soar to more than 100 rubles per USD, but after the "Gas for Ruble" scheme by Putin, the ruble has now stabilized back to 65 rubles per USD, so the Western plan to collapse Russia's economy did not succeed.
    1
  22685.  @stephenguy3901  "神州 Shenzhou governments of the world count not the population when we consider who supports Russia" The Bharatiya Janata Party has a population of 180 million (2019) while the Communist Party of China has a population of 95.148 million (2021) so combined together, our governments account for more than half of the world's government, then how can you claim the majority of the world is with Ukraine and condemns Putin? "To answer your question , I don't agree with anything you post ." Didn't you agree earlier that Ukraine is not a democracy but a hybrid regime as stated by Freedom House?
    1
  22686.  @stephenguy3901  The populations of Western countries (i.e U.S, U.K, Canada, Australia, EU countries) only account for around 14% of the world's entire population, whereas the populations of Asia and Africa account 66% of the world's population. Yet many seem to think that this 14% can speak on behalf of the rest of the world.
    1
  22687.  @soundbite290  If I had said that I don't work for the Chinese government, would you believe what I said?
    1
  22688.  @Y0U54F786  The Keriya Aitika Mosque is not destroyed, only the North Gate is demolished, while the South Gate and the prayer room remained intact. The prayer room is protected heritage, and even the video shows this at 3:12 so what's your problem?
    1
  22689.  @Y0U54F786  Firstly, we are talking about Islam many years ago, and Islamic invaders forced the natives of lands they converted to Islam. Muslims are told to fight unbelievers until they are either dead, converted to Islam, or in a permanent state of subjugation under Muslim domination. Allowing people of other faiths to live and worship independently of Islamic rule is not an option. Source: https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/forced-conversion.aspx Quran (8:38-39) - “Say to those who have disbelieved, if they cease (from disbelief) their past will be forgiven... And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do.” Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." Quran (9:5) "But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them..."
    1
  22690. @UCYGUIgoNdes5wabpmODQvyg China is imparting positive Chinese values to Uighurs, such as being studious and industrious, by providing free education and training them in skills necessary for the workplace. And Xinjiang was China's territory before Islam was even born, and even today, Xinjiang is recognized as part of China's territory. For example, if you draw the Map of People's Republic of China, territories like Xinjiang, Tibet, Inner Mongolia, Hong Kong, etc, are located within China's borders. So why can't China deal with issues within our borders? Look at the West, and it is estimated that some 4,000 people have left their homes in the West to migrate to ISIS. Many have become jihadist fighters in the apparent hope of achieving martyrdom. So why can't China take immediate action to cull the extremist tendencies in Uighurs? China is helping reducing the number of potential recruits to terrorist groups by doing this I really don't care if you love China or hate China personally. China is China, not your country, so what makes you think you know the best way to govern China then? Why do you seek to impose Western values onto China, when China is not the West?
    1
  22691.  @ohlawd3699  I have shown that Xinjiang was part of China before Islam itself was born, and was first referred to as "Xiyu" (Chinese: 西域) under the Han dynasty. You can't refute my points so you start claiming the whole world was part of China since ancient times?
    1
  22692. ​ @Y0U54F786  Here is another source about forced conversion, this time of Hindu women to Islam in Pakistan Source: ‘Forced conversions’ of Hindu women to Islam in Pakistan theconversation.com/forced-conversions-of-hindu-women-to-islam-in-pakistan-another-perspective-102726 Exactly, we can't punish every German because of Hitler. So what China is doing is reforming the extremist Uighurs through education, so that they can receive a proper Chinese education and become productive members of society, instead of joining the terrorists. Those Uighurs who are not terrorists are allowed to continue their lives as per normal in Xinjiang.
    1
  22693.  @nsms1297  Pakistan is our dearest ally, our "iron brother" and Pakistan always aided China in our time of need. And although India is older, it was Indians who agreed to partition British India in 1947 and give up their own territory to form Pakistan. Whereas China is not giving up Xinjiang, since it was part of China since before Islam itself was born. And about Kashmir, there have been numerous cases of rape of Kashmiri Muslim women by Indian Army forces, so why should China support India over our own iron brother in Kashmir? Source: Rape during the Kashmir conflict wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_during_the_Kashmir_conflict
    1
  22694.  Sancha Mezz  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China been successfully governed for millennia.
    1
  22695.  Sancha Mezz  Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by the rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china) which were in great demand throughout the ancient world.
    1
  22696.  Sancha Mezz  Hey earlier you told me to learn history, now you suddenly switch topic to Chinese character and manners? I've seen Americans tourists with bad character. For example, this social experiment showed how Americans treat Chinese in America and also how Chinese treat Americans in China. Video: How Americans and Chinese treat Foreigners differently youtu.be/04sTkhTRmWE In almost all the instances the Americans were rude and unhelpful, while the Chinese were polite and helpful. Chinese were even willing to escort the man who lost his wallet to the nearest police station.
    1
  22697.  Sancha Mezz  I've already shown you evidence of Chinese behaviour compared to Americans, yet you still claim I haven refuted your points? What more do you want me to show? And earlier you asked me to study history, so what has Chinese character even got to do with this discussion then?
    1
  22698.  Sancha Mezz  According to World Tourism Rankings, as of 2015, China is the 4th most visited country in the world, after France, United States, and Spain, seeing some 62.9 million international tourists in 2018. Source: World Tourism Rankings wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings China is also the most popular tourist destination in Asia, seeing more tourists than Japan, Korea, India, Thailand, Singapore, etc.
    1
  22699.  Sancha Mezz  So because you have bad experience with your Chinese friend, suddenly means that all Chinese people have bad character?
    1
  22700.  @pashakamaal236  The Mongols are always welcome to try and reclaim China if they want today. Genghis Khan killed so many people during his conquest of China (and also much of Eurasia) and the Mongols knew nothing of governance. Who grows the food necessary to feed the empire? The Mongols were nomadic tribesmen who lived off the land and simply moved to better pastures when times are lean. It was the Han Chinese farmers who worked hard to grow food and feed the empire. Who plans the towns and built buildings in the empire? The Mongols were nomadic and lived in tents (called yurts) so they know nothing about permanent housing. It was the Han architects and builders that built permanent housing and planned the towns. Who ensures that the day-to-day affairs of the empire is kept running smoothly? The Mongols know nothing about bureaucracy and running an empire, so it was up to the Han bureaucrats to ensure that the empire was running smoothly, taxes were collected, etc. The Mongols were barbarians who only knew how to fight, pillage food grown by farmers, burn villages, destroy people's lives, ruin priceless works of art, and violate women. It's estimated that 1 in every 200 men in the world today are descended from Genghis Khan, which is testament to the fecundity of the Mongols. And for what, when they don't know how to hold onto territory they conquered?
    1
  22701.  @vipulsrivastava1856  "神州 Shenzhou not the oldest but one of the oldest" Did I ever said that Chinese civilisation is the oldest? And ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by the rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china) which were in great demand throughout the ancient world. Take Han Chinese traditional clothing Hanfu (汉服) for example and it has 5,000 years of history and even the Japanese Kimono and Korean Hanbok clothing have their origins in Chinese Hanfu. Video: Beautiful Traditional Costume: Han Chinese Clothing (Hanfu) youtu.be/T6CucJxiWec?t=5
    1
  22702.  @vipulsrivastava1856  Look at Chinese history and ancient Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought.
    1
  22703.  @vipulsrivastava1856  "Look at the development in the field of mathematics, music, art, architecture, medical, astrophysics, etc" In the field of mathematics and physics, the world's oldest decimal multiplication tables were written on bamboo slips (Tsinghua Bamboo Slips 清华简) dating to about 305 BC, during China's Warring States period. Source: Multiplication Tables wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplication_table#History Tian yuan shu (天元术) is a Chinese system of algebra for polynomial equations created in the 13th century. It is first known from the writing of Li Zhi (Li Ye), though it was created earlier. Source: Tian Yuan Shu wikipedia.org/wiki/Tian_yuan_shu
    1
  22704.  @vipulsrivastava1856  About Chinese Music and Art, China has a long, rich history of music, and many Chinese musical instruments have been invented throughout our long history. Take the Guzheng (古筝) or Chinese Zither for example and this beautiful musical piece is entitled High Mountains, Flowing Waters 《高山流水》and dates back thousands of years to the Warring States Period of China. Video: Guzheng - High Mountain Flowing Water 古筝 - 高山流水 youtu.be/ffCKlqWOewo Here's more modern Chinese musical piece based on the popular Chinese movie Swordsman 《笑傲江湖》 theme song, also played on the Chinese Zither. Please take a listen and enjoy the music. Video: 笑傲江湖 Guzheng "Swordsman" Theme Song youtu.be/_3pLesuLT4w About Art in China, have you seen those beautiful Chinese landscape paintings, known as Shanshui (山水 "Mountains and Waters") featuring beautiful mountain landscapes? Here are some videos of beautiful Chinese mountain paintings. Video: Landscape Traditional Painting in Chinese Art youtu.be/NdT_Z1WXCC8 Video: Landscape Chinese Art Painting youtu.be/Bz5Y97-WwEA
    1
  22705.  @vipulsrivastava1856  In the field of Architecture, Medical and Astrophysics, everyone heard of the famous Great Wall of China built by Chinese architects. Chinese architecture has influenced the architectural styles of Japan, Korea, Vietnam, etc and the distinctive "curved roof" style of Chinese temples, pavilions and pagodas is iconic of Asian architecture. Video: Great Wall of China: Jinshanling to Simatai in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/OEbZ5Y-sxAo The Forbidden City in Beijing is an excellent demonstration of Chinese architecture, and was the seat of the Imperial Emperor from the Ming Dynasty. The Forbidden City is the largest palace in the world as well as the most visited palace, surpassing even Western palaces by sheer volume of visitors. Video: Forbidden City, Beijing, China in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/R9vcSWb6mug Video: Forbidden City From Above - The Largest Palace in the World youtu.be/6eGjDiO7Kzc About Chinese medical advancements, there's Traditional Chinese Medicine that is based on more than 3500 years of Chinese medical practice. Chinese acupuncture is also famous and been used for thousands of years to treat ailments. About Chinese astrophysics, Chinese astronomers kept detailed records of astronomical observations. For example, the supernova that created the Crab Nebula was first recorded by Chinese astronomers in 1054, but wasn't recorded by European astronomers. The world's first star catalogue was made by Gan De, a Chinese astronomer in the 4th century BC. Source: History of Astronomy wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_astronomy#China
    1
  22706.  @vipulsrivastava1856  About Chinese Musical Instruments, besides the Chinese zither, there is also the Chinese Bamboo Flute, Dizi (笛子) whose notes are distinctive of East Asia. Just listening to the sound the Chinese Bamboo Flute makes, conjures images of the picturesque Chinese landscape, bamboo forests, misty mountains shrouded by clouds, cascading curtains of waterfalls, the occasional Chinese pavilion, and other images of Asia. Video: Dizi Chinese Bamboo Flute - Painted Heart youtu.be/-SyI0VvaKhA?t=28 Video: Endless Love - Bamboo Flute youtu.be/WwSoOVmO4gk?t=55 Video: Beautiful Chinese Music - Tranquil Departure - Bamboo Flute youtu.be/8GV7bzn5QoYt=30 Video: Beautiful Chinese Music - Bamboo Flute youtu.be/-5qhNRmMilI Archaeologists have discovered evidence suggesting that the simple transverse flutes have been present in China for over 9,000 years. Fragments of bone flutes from this period are still playable today, and are remarkably similar to modern versions in terms of hole placement, etc. The Jiahu neolithic site in central Henan province of China has yielded flutes dating back to 7,000 BC - 5,000 BC that could represent the earliest playable instruments ever found. Video: If Treasures Could Talk, What would China's Jia Hu Bone Flute say? youtu.be/NMLB-yy7AOc
    1
  22707.  @vipulsrivastava1856  About Chinese Architecture, the Forbidden City in Beijing is the most visited palace in the world, surpassing even the Western palaces by sheer volume of visitors at over 17 million. List of most visited palaces and monuments by City and Number of visitors 1. Forbidden City (China, 17,000,000+ visitors) 2. Palace of Versailes (France, 8,100,000 visitors) 3. Lincoln Memorial (USA, 7,804,683 visitors) 4. Coliseum (Italy, 7,650,519 visitors) 5. Parthenon (Greece, 7,200,000 visitors) ... Source: List of most visited palaces and monuments wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_visited_palaces_and_monuments#List Besides the Forbidden City, the Summer Palace (颐和园) in Beijing is famous for its Chinese architecture, Chinese gardens, lakes and was declared by UNESCO World Heritage as "a masterpiece of Chinese landscape garden design. The natural landscape of hills and open water is combined with artificial features such as pavilions, halls, palaces, temples and bridges to form a harmonious ensemble of outstanding aesthetic value". But don't take my word for it, here's some beautiful footage of the Summer Palace in Beijing. Video: Beautiful Summer Palace, Beijing youtu.be/dQHPb-NJCXk?t=140 Video: Summer Palace, Beijing, China in HD youtu.be/H8Ek76soHfY Besides the famous Great Wall of China, there's another marvel of Chinese engineering and architecture in the form of the Grand Canal (world's oldest and longest artificial river). Starting at Beijing, it passes through Tianjin and the provinces of Hebei, Shandong, Jiangsu and Zhejiang to the city of Hangzhou, linking the Yellow River and Yangtze River. Video: China's Grand Canal in foreigners Eyes youtu.be/Xr35Y0nKbzM
    1
  22708.  @vipulsrivastava1856  Ancient Chinese mathematicians invented the world's first negative numbers. Negative numbers appeared for the first time in history in the Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art, 《九章算术》which in its present form dates from the period of the Chinese Han Dynasty (202 BC – AD 220), but may well contain much older material. Liu Hui (c. 3rd century) established rules for adding and subtracting negative numbers. By the 7th century, Indian mathematicians such as Brahmagupta were describing the use of negative numbers. Source: Negative numbers wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_number#History For a long time, negative solutions to problems were considered "false". In Hellenistic Egypt, the Greek mathematician Diophantus in the 3rd century AD referred to an equation that was equivalent to 4x + 20 = 4 (which has a negative solution) in Arithmetica, saying that the equation was absurd. The historian Jean-Claude Martzloff theorized that the importance of duality in Chinese natural philosophy made it easier for the Chinese to accept the idea of negative numbers. The Chinese were able to solve simultaneous equations involving negative numbers.
    1
  22709.  @vipulsrivastava1856  Ancient Chinese mathematicians invented the the concept of arrays and made use of them to solve linear equations. Matrices have a long history of application in solving linear equations but they were known as arrays until the 1800s. The Chinese text _The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art 《九章算术》 written in 10th–2nd century BCE is the first example of the use of array methods to solve simultaneous equations._ Source: Matrix wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_(mathematics)#History Chinese mathematicians also invented the matrix determinant. In linear algebra, the determinant is a scalar value that can be computed from the elements of a square matrix and encodes certain properties of the linear transformation described by the matrix. Determinants were first used in the Chinese mathematics textbook The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art 《九章算术》Chinese scholars, around the 3rd century BCE). In Europe, 2 × 2 determinants were considered by Cardano at the end of the 16th century and larger ones by Leibniz. Source: Determinant wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinant#History
    1
  22710.  @vipulsrivastava1856  About Chinese Musical Instruments, besides the bamboo flute, Chinese also have the Erhu (二胡) aka the Chinese Violin, which only has two strings, but produces a beautiful sad note, that sounds almost human-like, like the voice of a woman crying her heart out. Please have a listen to this Erhu piece and enjoy the music. Video: 雨碎江南 二胡版 Rain in Jiangnan Erhu Cover youtu.be/AVXejOoPECA?t=15 Video: Erhu - Ballad of North Henan Province 预北叙事曲youtu.be/7fdFGEg-9R8?t=50 Video: 旅愁 Sad Traveller Erhu youtu.be/Oge5T_JiZq4?t=10 But its not only capable of playing sad-sounding music, the erhu is also capable of joyous music when played fast, and you often hear Erhu in the Spring Festival (Chinese New Year) celebrations.
    1
  22711.  @vipulsrivastava1856  About Medical advances in China, ancient Chinese physicians invented the world's first inoculation for smallpox. The earliest hints of the practice of inoculation for smallpox in China come during the 10th century. The Chinese also practiced the oldest documented use of variolation, dating back to the fifteenth century. They implemented a method of "nasal insufflation" administered by blowing powdered smallpox material, usually scabs, up the nostrils. Various insufflation techniques have been recorded throughout the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries within China. Source: Vaccines wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine#History A Song dynasty (960–1279) chancellor of China, Wang Dan (957–1017), lost his eldest son to smallpox and sought a means to spare the rest of his family from the disease, so he summoned physicians, wise men, and magicians from all across the empire to convene at the capital in Kaifeng and share ideas on how to cure patients of it until a divine man from Mount Emei carried out inoculation. Source: Inoculation wikipedia.org/wiki/Inoculation#China The first clear and credible reference to smallpox inoculation in China comes from Wan Quan's (1499–1582) Douzhen Xinfa 《痘疹心法》 of 1549, which states that some women unexpectedly menstruate during the procedure, yet his text did not give details on techniques of inoculation.[4] Inoculation was first vividly described by Yu Chang in his book Yuyi cao 《寓意草》, or Notes on My Judgment, published in 1643. Inoculation was reportedly not widely practiced in China until the reign of the Longqing Emperor (r. 1567–1572) during the Ming dynasty (1368–1644), as written by Yu Tianchi in his Shadou Jijie 《痧痘集解》 of 1727, which he alleges was based on Wang Zhangren's Douzhen Jinjing Lu 《痘疹金鏡錄》 of 1579.
    1
  22712.  @vipulsrivastava1856  It is not confirmed that Bodhidarma is South Indian Monk. According to the principal Chinese sources, Bodhidharma came from the Western Regions which refers to Central Asia so there is a possibility that Bodhidarma is a "Persian Central Asian." The Western Regions was a historical name specified in the Chinese chronicles between the 3rd century BC to the 8th century AD that referred to the regions west of Yumen Pass, most often Central Asia or sometimes more specifically the easternmost portion of it (e.g. Altishahr or the Tarim Basin in southern Xinjiang). Source: Bodhidarma wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodhidharma#Principal_sources The earliest text mentioning Bodhidharma is The Record of the Buddhist Monasteries of Luoyang 《洛陽伽藍記》 (Luòyáng Qiélánjì) which was compiled in 547 by Yáng Xuànzhī (楊衒之), a writer and translator of Mahayana sutras into Chinese. Yang gave the following account: At that time there was a monk of the Western Region named Bodhidharma, a Persian Central Asian. And it was a Myth that Bodhidarma created Shaolin Kung-fu. Traditionally Bodhidharma is credited as founder of the martial arts at the Shaolin Temple. However, martial arts historians have shown this legend stems from a 17th-century qigong manual known as the Yijin Jing. The preface of this work says that Bodhidharma left behind the Yi Jin Jing, from which the monks obtained the fighting skills which made them gain some fame. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodhidharma#Principal_sources#Shaolin_boxing The authenticity of the Yi Jin Jing has been discredited by some historians including Tang Hao, Xu Zhen and Matsuda Ryuchi. According to Lin Boyuan, "This manuscript is full of errors, absurdities and fantastic claims; it cannot be taken as a legitimate source." The oldest available copy was published in 1827. The composition of the text itself has been dated to 1624. Even then, the association of Bodhidharma with martial arts only became widespread as a result of the 1904–1907 serialization of the novel The Travels of Lao Ts'an in Illustrated Fiction Magazine. According to Henning, the "story is clearly a twentieth-century invention," which "is confirmed by writings going back at least 250 years earlier, which mention both Bodhidharma and martial arts but make no connection between the two." So Bodhidarma did not teach Shaolin Monks Kung Fu, it was only because of 1900s Fiction Magazine that associated Kung-fu with Bodhidarma.
    1
  22713.  @vipulsrivastava1856  Gautama Buddha was actually born in what constitutes modern day Nepal, not India. And Nepal is their own separate country from India, whereas Tibet is part of China today. "神州 Shenzhou you are talking about rapes as China is free from rape...this is bul**hit...and the world knows what chinese army has done to Hong Kong, Vietnam and Japan" When did I ever said anything about rapes here? And what did Chinese army do to Hong Kong, Vietnam and Japan? The Chinese Army did not even land on Japan (the Mongols tried to, but failed) so what did China do to Japan? But did you hear about what Japan did to China? And speaking of rapes, look at what Indian Army did to Kashmiri Muslim women in Jammu & Kashmir. Since the onset of the insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir in 1988, rape has been used as a weapon of war by Indian security forces; comprising the Indian Army, Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and Border Security personnel, against the Kashmiri population. The numerous rapes of Kashmiri Muslim women by Indian state forces are generally ignored. Source: Rape during the Kashmir conflict wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_during_the_Kashmir_conflict
    1
  22714.  @vipulsrivastava1856  About Chinese Culture, Chinese people celebrate many festivals like Spring Festival (Chinese New year), Lantern Festival, Qingming (Grave Sweeping) Festival, Dragonboat Festival, Double Seventh (Chinese Valentines day) Festival, Mid-autumn Festival, and so many ancient Chinese festivals. Video: Dragon Boat Races Celebrate China's Ancient Past | National Geographic youtu.be/YlPExNPyPwQ Video: How Modern Chinese Celebrate Qingming Festival youtu.be/mFGYrPNXaLg The Spring Festival migration has been even termed the largest annual human migration in the world, according to Forbes Magazine. Source: Chinese New Year: The World's Largest Human Migration Is About To Begin forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2018/02/14/chinese-new-year-the-worlds-largest-human-migration-is-about-to-begin-infographic/ More people in the world celebrate Chinese New Year than even the Western Christmas celebration.
    1
  22715.  @syedfaddy6887  "神州 Shenzhou go to hell. Corona virus" Why resort to insulting me personally, just because my views happen to differ from yours? I don't wish ill of others just because their view happen to differ from mine.
    1
  22716.  @sunnyinmilkyway2114  China is the major economic engine that driving Asia's growth, why'd you want China out of the picture?
    1
  22717. Probably silenced by the media for his views that go against the "mainstream narrative."
    1
  22718. He's probably been silenced by the media for going against the mainstream narrative.
    1
  22719. The media ostracizes him because his views go against the "mainstream narrative."
    1
  22720. ​@Fleshox19-uz3qt What makes you think India or Japan has moral or ethical government compared to China? Haven't you heard of the atrocities going on in Indian occupied Kashmir?
    1
  22721. Speaking of slaves, did you know that India has world's largest slave population that is 5 times more than any other country in the world
    1
  22722.  @jtf873  What Henry Kissinger was trying to suggest is that it you are an American enemy then that can be a danger but at least you know where you stand. But if you are a friend then the US will destroy you - not necessarily from malice but because of how America operates.
    1
  22723.  @jtf873  What he was trying to suggest is that it you are an enemy of the US then that can be a danger but at least you know where you stand. But if you are a friend then you will be destroyed because that's how the US operates.
    1
  22724.  @jtf873  What he was trying to suggest is that it you are an enemy then that can be a danger but at least you know where you stand. But if you are a friend then you will be destroyed because that's how the US operates.
    1
  22725. 老师说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  22726.  @thedaredevil1907  You said: "you can't in the bottem of you gut think the CCP has the interest of the average Chinese persons interest at hart." What makes you think the Communist Party of China doesn't have the interest of the average Chinese persons at heart? The Communist Party is doing all that it can to provide flood relief to the citizens of Zhengzhou.
    1
  22727.  @thedaredevil1907  You said: "...freedom to practice your religion" About Religion in China, China has nearly 200 million religious believers and more than 380,000 clerical personnel. The 5 major religions practiced in China are Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism, and Protestantism. China has over 20 million Muslims, more than 57,000 clerical personnel. There are around 222,000 Buddhist clerical personnel and over 40,000 Taoist clerical personnel. Catholicism and Protestantism have 6 million and 38 million followers in China, respectively, with 8,000 and 57,000 clerical personnel. There are approximately 5,500 religious groups in China, including seven national organizations which are Buddhist Association of China, Chinese Taoist Association, China Islamic Association, Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association, Bishops’ Conference of Catholic Church in China, National Committee of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement of the Protestant Churches in China, and China Christian Council. At present, there are about 144,000 places of worship registered for religious activities in China, among which are 33,500 Buddhist temples (including 28,000 Han Buddhist temples, 3,800 Tibetan Buddhist lamaseries, and 1,700 Theravada Buddhist temples), 9,000 Taoist temples, 35,000 Islamic mosques, 6,000 Catholic churches and places of assembly spread across 98 dioceses, and 60,000 Protestant churches and places of assembly. Source:nation.com.pk/03-Apr-2018/china-has-over-20-million-muslims-35-000-mosques
    1
  22728.  @thedaredevil1907  This is my opinion as an atheist, but if your government don't control religion, then religion may start controlling your government. Chinese government only crackdown on those "underground churches" who refuse to register themselves properly with the government, but if you as a Christian (or Muslim, Buddhist, etc) register yourself properly with the government authorities, then the government will leave you alone. As for organ harvesting in China, it was legal under old Chinese laws to harvest the organs of prisoners on death row, but only with the earlier permission of the prisoner or from family members. In my opinion, the prisoner is already sentenced to death, but at least the organs will be put to good use saving someone else's life, instead of being wasted, and buried together with the body upon death. But since 2014, China has abolished the practice of harvesting organs from executed prisoners, and organ transplant rates in China are low and waiting lists are long. China is not alone in having low transplant rates in Asia—even richer countries such as Japan and Singapore fall far short of Western countries. Source: The Economist: Organ Harvest
    1
  22729.  @thedaredevil1907  You said: "...look up what I say tell me I'm wrong please" Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? I cite links to support my arguments, but all you done is shoot words out your mouth without proof. You really believe all those organ harvesting rumors that no world leader (not US President Biden, Canadian PM Trudeau, Russian President Putin, German Chancellor Merkel, France President Macron, Indian PM Modi, Japanese PM Suga, etc) is even talking about to Chinese President Xi? ... You said: "..I can't save your country for your kids and grand kids chan only yall can do that .maybe yall love living under that boot" A recent long term Harvard University survey has revealed that an estimated 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    1
  22730.  @thedaredevil1907  "神州 Shenzhou haha youtube is funny they deleted my comments" So you're saying that censorship exists on Western platform like YouTube? Since they deleted your comments? And again, why do you want Chinese people to overthrow our government? The collapse of the Communist Party of China would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China? From your words, I can tell you don't really care about China's interests, you just can't stand to see China succeed that's all. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today under the CPC, China is world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. So why should China get rid of our government that has been so successful? Because Westerners say so?
    1
  22731.  @MarkYeung1  It's Capitalism in Hong Kong that's creating inequality and allowing the rich Hong Kong property tycoons to control the scarce land, and jack up property prices beyond the reach of young Hong Kong couples seeking to settle down. Furthermore, since Hong Kong is a tax haven for capitalists, Hong Kong government doesn't receive income from taxing businesses, so instead they tax the land sales instead, so they are under no pressure to respond to the rising land prices. Hypothetically, had it been Communism in Hong Kong then the communists would seize the land from the rich corrupt landlords and redistribute it to the peasants, at least that's what happened in the mainland under Chairman Mao). As a result many peasants finally have land to call their own, instead of slaving away under the corrupt KMT landlords.
    1
  22732.  @MarkYeung1  You're literally comparing a continent (North America) with mainland China, but the fact remains that there are more Hong Kong people living in mainland China (472,900) than in the United States of America (330,000) or Canada (215,775) and the numbers don't lie. Why not compare country to country, instead of continent to country?
    1
  22733.  @MarkYeung1  Did you know that Canada experiences among the highest rates of anti-Asian hate? In 2020, more anti-Asian hate crimes were reported to police in Vancouver, a city of 700,000 people, than in the top 10 most populous U.S. cities combined, with almost 1 out of every 2 residents of Asian descent in British Columbia experiencing a hate incident in the past year.
    1
  22734.  @MarkYeung1  Again, why compare one country China to two countries, USA and Canada? If you want to play it that way, then Hong Kong is literally part of China, so if the entire Hong Kong population of 7,234,800 are actually living in China, That's more than the number of Hong Kong people in the United States (330,000) and Canada (215,775).
    1
  22735.  @MarkYeung1  The problem that's plaguing Hong Kong is that some Hong Kongers (but not all) are still suffering from the subservient "colonial mindset". Back when Hong Kong was still a British colony, the British colonizers influenced Hong Kong education system to paint Western culture in a superior light, and this raised entire generations of Chinese children who worship Westerners. Even when the British physically decolonised and vacated Hong Kong, the "decolonization of the mind" still needs some time to heal the mental damage inflicted by colonization on the mindset of the colonized. I mean, you talked about how many Hong Kongers uproot their lives and travel across the Pacific Ocean to a different culture in North America, then why don't they travel to Taiwan island? Why does Taiwan island only have 87,719 Hong Kongers?
    1
  22736.  @MarkYeung1  That's not the point. Earlier you wrote (and I quote your words): "People would uproot their lives going to a different culture/language than staying with the motherland a border away." But since Taiwan island is the same Chinese culture/language as the mainland, and Taiwan is a Western style democracy, then why don't Hong Kongers choose to stay in Taiwan island instead of USA (with their different American culture/language)?
    1
  22737.  @deepone5005  Maybe not Taiwan island because of the lack of economic opportunities and stagnation of their economy. Because like Taiwan, the mainland also speak Mandarin/Putonghua and yet there are more Hong Kong expatriates in mainland China (472,900) than in the United States (330,000) or Canada (215,775).
    1
  22738.  @MarkYeung1  Taiwan is Western-style democracy, has familiar Chinese culture and Chinese characters (Traditional script too) for Hong Kongers, yet Taiwan only attracted 87,719 Hong Kong expatraites, compared to mainland China at 472,900, even though Taiwan is Western-style democracy while the mainland isn't. So again, the problem is not people uprooting their lives going to a different culture/language, it's because of the "colonial mentality" afflicting the people of Hong Kong to worship everything white and harbor a disdain towards anything non-white.
    1
  22739.  @MarkYeung1  Did you know that there's rising anti-Asian sentiment in Canada targeting Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese and other people of Asian descent? So much such that Vancouver has been nicknamed the "Anti-Asian Hate Crime Capital of North America" according to Bloomberg news. Last year, more anti-Asian hate crimes were reported to police in Vancouver, a city of 700,000 people, than in the top 10 most populous U.S. cities combined. With almost 1 out of every 2 residents of Asian descent in British Columbia experiencing a hate incident in the past year, the region is confronting an undercurrent of racism that runs as long and deep as the historical links stretching across the Pacific.
    1
  22740.  @MansMan42069  Agreed. Even though Malaysia and Singapore are both former British colonies, I think Malaysia is more resistant to mental colonialism than Singapore, despite Singapore having a higher percentage of ethnic Chinese in their population. Seems like Chinese in general, tend to be susceptible to mental colonialism in my experience.
    1
  22741.  @biggpicture2930  "China learnt from Singapore." Where did Singapore learn meritocracy from? Meritocracy originated in ancient China in the form of the civil service examinations. The concept originates, at least by the sixth century BC, when it was advocated by the Chinese philosopher Confucius. So in a way, Singapore learned its system from ancient China.
    1
  22742.  @biggpicture2930  "Shenzhou. You forgot , Singapore have Colonial Mentality, so definitely British taught them Meritocracy." Well then, where did Britain learn meritocracy from? The fact remains that meritocracy originated in ancient China in the form of the civil service examinations. Also, as I've previously stated, Singapore is a former British colony, so there are bound to be traces of the colonial mentality. All former colonies be it India, Malaysia, Singapore and even Hong Kong have varying levels of colonial mentality.
    1
  22743.  GEO NEO  Strictly speaking, the current China-US relations haven't devolved to the point of the Cold-War, where there was almost absolutely no communication between USA and USSR. No American athletes would be allowed to shake hands with Soviet athletes during the Cold War. Today, China and USA haven't reached such a state.
    1
  22744.  GEO NEO  We are currently not in a full blown Cold War. Although US-China relations are deteriorating, channels of communication are still open, unlike the Cold War where there was no communication between USA and USSR.
    1
  22745.  china is in decline  Good News, President Xi has spoken with Zelenskyy over the phone. This demonstrates China's commitment to a peaceful resolution to the Ukraine conflict.
    1
  22746.  @elliekwong3180  This is good news for anyone seeking a peaceful resolution to the Ukraine conflict.
    1
  22747.  @shuathe2nd  Gulf War was instigated by the Nayirah testimony claiming that Iraq soldiers were taking babies out of incubators, but it was proven to be a hoax. So was the Weapons of Mass Destruction lie claimed to be justification for the U.S invasion of Iraq. And Afghanistan was certainly not responsible for the "largest terrorist atrocity of all time on the US" Al Qaeda wasn't even in Afghanistan yet the U.S literally occupied Afghanistan for nearly 20 years. (Also, in my opinion the so-called "largest terrorist atrocity of all time on the US" pales in comparison to the genocide of Native Americans and occupation of their lands in America even till today. That was by far, the greater atrocity)
    1
  22748.  @shuathe2nd  The U.S made use of a false testimony by a young girlm Nayirah claiming to have seen Iraqi soldiers taking babies out of incubators as justification for U.S involvement in Gulf War. But it was later proven to be a hoax, just like the WMDs that Iraq was supposedly hiding. And Afghanistan is not responsible for the so-called "largest terrorist atrocity of all time on the US," since Osama was found in Pakistan. Also in my opinion the U.S causing genocide of Native Americans and occupation of their lands even till today constitutes the largest atrocity of all time committed on U.S soil
    1
  22749.  @shuathe2nd  The U.S made use of a false testimony by a young girlm Nayirah claiming to have seen Iraqi soldiers taking babies out of incubators as justification for U.S involvement in Gulf War. But it was later proven to be a hoax, just like the WMDs that Iraq was supposedly hiding. And Afghanistan is not responsible for the so-called "largest terrorist atrocity of all time on the US," since Osama was found in Pakistan.
    1
  22750.  @shuathe2nd  The U.S made use of a false testimony by a young girl, Nayirah claiming to have seen Iraqi soldiers taking babies out of incubators as justification for U.S involvement in Gulf War. But it was later proven to be a hoax, just like the WMDs that Iraq was supposedly hiding. And Afghanistan is not responsible for 9/11, it turns out that they were hiding in Pakistan not Afghanistan.
    1
  22751.  @shuathe2nd  Nobody cared about the Gulf War, so the U.S used a young girl, Nayirah's false testimony claiming that Iraqi soldiers were stealing incubators from babies as justification for their involvement in the Gulf War. Just like the WMDs hoax created to justify Iraq War. And the people responsible for 9/11 were not in Afghanistan, they were hiding in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.
    1
  22752.  @shuathe2nd  The U.S made use of a false testimony by a young girl, Nayirah as justification for U.S involvement in Gulf War. But it was later proven to be a hoax, just like the WMDs that Iraq was supposedly hiding. And Afghanistan is not responsible for 9/11, it turns out that they were hiding in Pakistan not Afghanistan
    1
  22753.  @shuathe2nd  So you've at least admitted that the U.S is a warmonger by acknowledging U.S involvement in those wars. As for China, we were previously a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, yet fast forward till today and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under Communist Party leadership, despite Western propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. Why is China in your view, not a model for developing countries to emulate? Also, what makes you seem to think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Before 2020, everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending coin on your tourism industries. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students studying the same topics as their local peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE are expanding overseas, and Chinese investors are buying up land overseas. So what makes you think Chinese aren't free? Chinese can be found all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  22754. NASA calls it the so-called "International" Space Station, yet they don't allow 20% of the world's population (i.e China) from accessing it.
    1
  22755. The world thought USA would guide them in a crisis, but with an elected incompetent leader in power, its now up to China to show countries how to deal with the virus.
    1
  22756. @edgelord69 The Chinese government is willing to sacrifice China's economy and halt production, closing tourist attractions, imposing lockdown, banning mass gatherings, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and contain the virus. Now it's finally paying off that the virus is under control in China and we are cautiously reopening our economy. But in Western countries like US and UK, their economies are far too precious to sacrifice so human health has to be sacrificed instead. Donald Trump wants to reopen the economy by Easter and Boris Johnson is relying on "herd immunity" to the pull through. So human lives have to be sacrificed instead of the economy.
    1
  22757. @edgelord69 You're not even American yourself? Look at Trump blaming China, blaming WHO, blaming medical workers for "backdoor pilfering" of supplies, and how exactly did USA handle this situation maturely? China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China bought the West time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    1
  22758. @edgelord69 Why call Covid-19 by it's improper name abusing racially-offensive term Kungflue virus? And China reported to World Health Organization about the emergence of a new coronavirus strain on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020, China had identified the coronavirus strain and by 7th Jan 2020 China had completely sequenced Covid-19 genome and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China bought the West time to deal with virus but the West squandered it straitstimes.com/opinion/china-bought-the-west-time-the-west-squandered-it
    1
  22759. @edgelord69 Look at China's response and after Wuhan was lockdown, China flew 42,000 doctors to Wuhan and sent masks, gloves, goggles, faceshields, PPE suits, and ventilators to Wuhan. The government rushed to built 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days, followed by a 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. Video: Xi Jinping: 'People's Safety and Health always comes first' youtu.be/G_hiIpEXpTg But look at USA and what the Federal government did for New York? American healthcare workers look overwhelmed, overworked, exhausted, ill-equipped facing shortage of masks, gloves, goggles, faceshields, PPE suits while Chinese doctors and nurses look well-equipped in comparison. And USA had 3 months to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but Trump just downplayed the virus and blame China, blame WHO, blame those medical workers for "backdoor pilfering" supplies.
    1
  22760. @edgelord69 You're just anti-China that's all, abusing racially-offensive term Kungflue virus. The government rushed to built a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised. Video: Huoshenshan: the hospital built in 10 days in China over coronavirus outbreak youtu.be/l2QfufpwfdY Kudos to the Chinese construction workers who worked hard to build those hospitals. China also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. Video: Time-lapse video shows how Leishenshan hospital completed in 12 days youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk
    1
  22761. @kings of s**t  Other countries had 2 months to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, China only had 2 weeks, yet you're blaming China?
    1
  22762.  @jasonfung9516  So your relative sent you clips of people collapsing on the ground, suddenly means that Wuhan is dangerous? Wuhan actually lifted from lockdown and here's a Wuhan light show to honor the heroes. Video: Wuhan light show honors heroes as lockdown ends youtu.be/LGu-L5ULByw
    1
  22763. @kings of s**t Who says Hubei is chaotic? Here's a beautiful drone light show to celebrate the lifting of lockdown in Wuhan. Video: Coronavirus: To Celebrate Lockdown Lifted with drone light show youtu.be/ycd58AdWuRs
    1
  22764. @kings of s**t The coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, Chinese scientists said that the analysis of genomic data from 93 samples of the novel coronavirus suggests it was imported from elsewhere. Source: Coronavirus did not originate in Wuhan seafood market, Chinese scientists say scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3051981/coronavirus-did-not-originate-wuhan-seafood-market-chinese
    1
  22765.  @jasonfung9516  Have you actually been to Wuhan yourself and see what life is like there? Wuhan has reopened and is returning to normalcy. Video: Wuhan reopens with a light show | Bright side youtu.be/j0IVayXiS2U
    1
  22766. @kings of s**t  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  22767.  @currentchannel3452  David Fincher’s 1999 movie,《Fight Club》is based on author Chuck Palahniuk's 1996 novel of the same name, but he changed then ending, then why can't China change the ending to be closer to the original novel (as confirmed by the book's author)? Look at how Disney changed the endings of Han's Christian Anderson novels and other fairy tales to give a good ending instead of an oftentimes more tragic ending like in the original stories.
    1
  22768.  @peterhanssens7260  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. Even in terms of innovation, Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. All these inventions were made whilst China was under the authoritarian rule of monarchy, by the Chinese Emperors and the Imperial Court, not under Western democracy. So is there really a need for China to be abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    1
  22769.  @peterhanssens7260  "神州 Shenzhou The United States is a republic where in the last number of years has it exported it's goverance model?" The USA has overthrown Middle Eastern leaders like Saddam Hussein (Iraq) and Muammar Gaddafi (Libya), and installed their own puppet U.S governments into place. The puppet governments care more about supporting the US interests than about their own people's interests. The USA has supported color revolutions in South America, such as Venezuela and Bolivia, waging wars such as Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Yemen War. Whereas China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. So which country do you think is the real threat to global peace and stability here?
    1
  22770.  @thevirusfactory2332  "神州Shenzhou DECOUPLE FROM CHINA NOW" Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that the cost of living in other countries is kept to a minimum. Think about the billions of dollars people have saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent elsewhere on things like _cars, housing, luxury brands, rent, tuition fees, etc. Isn't that why many Americans often flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money?
    1
  22771.  @thevirusfactory2332  Huawei actually overtook Apple to become the world's 2nd largest smartphone maker. The USA is using Huawei CFO extradition as a means to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride that's all.
    1
  22772.  @thevirusfactory2332  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  22773.  @thevirusfactory2332  "神州 Shenzhou BOYCOTT EVERYTHING CHINA" So how about you go home and throw away EVERYTHING that's Made in China. Clothing, shoes, appliances, electronics, TV, refrigerator, etc. Even those containing Made-in-China parts, open up your devices and check for Made-in-China parts and throw them away.
    1
  22774.  @peterhanssens7260  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, which country will disrespect their founding father like that? If not for Chairman Mao, China today would still be a divided country, fighting among ourselves instead of the strong unified country we are today. …… You said: "If the CCP were to fall as a governance model that provinces would break away and become independent states." That's precisely why the Communist Party of China needs to hold on to power. If the CPC falls, that would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country. You said: "I am no sure about Tibet being part of China, do they not have their own culture and history and what historical" Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. Just look up maps of Yuan Dynasty China and Qing Dynasty China and Tibet was clearly part of Chinese history. Source: Map of Yuan Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/04/yuan.jpg Source: Map of Qing Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/06/f114660d2bf5452994135c4c.gif
    1
  22775.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "If you feel that having a Totalitarian governance model is right for China, then why are some many well educated and wealthy Chinese immigrating because they want a good quality education free of ideology and a system free of ideological overreach by the government ?" China has to host the world's largest population, so its possible that there are simply not enough resources, not enough schools, not enough jobs for everyone in China. With such a huge student population, *competition is extremely fierce*and intense for top schools and higher education here in China. Some students unable to apply for local universities, so they may choose to study abroad (especially if their parents have $$$) Some graduates unable to find work in China, so they seek employment opportunities abroad as well. That's why Western countries are positively flooded with Chinese international students, competing with local students in tests, exams, for university spots and even job offers when they graduate. If overseas Chinese can't find a job in the West, they are always welcome to come back to China (thus saving China the resources needed to train this student to university degree) and bringing foreign knowledge and technology to our shores. If overseas Chinese find a job in your country, they are depriving a Western graduate of a job, and if they rise to high position in corporate or government posts, then they might get approached by the communist party to be recruited as a spy in Western countries. Whichever way you look at it, China wins. …… You said: "Do you think it is a good idea to teach Xi's thoughts to children in elementary school when children at that age will not question and take things as a given ? Is it right to teach state sponsored propaganda to young innocent children ?" What's wrong with teaching our children President Xi Jinping Thought? Your Western democracies teach your children democratic doctrine, then what's wrong China teaching our children communist doctrine? Your Western democracies literally teach your children to worship democracy and demonized communism, than what's wrong with China teaching our children the ideals of communism?
    1
  22776.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "If China uses vindication as a means to keep the Chinese people on side with the CCP's aspirations then is that not very biased and one sided and gives the Chinese population s preconceived notion of the Western Democracies ?" China is not against Westerners democracies' political system, in fact many Chinese used to admire Western democracies, although the recent emergence of Trump has shown how democracy can potentially fail catastrophically. What China is against is the actions of Western democracies like USA waging wars such Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Yemen War, etc, not against the ideology of democracy itself. Since USA's actions belie its warmongering tendencies, China needs to step back up our defense in the scenario the USA decides to wage war against China, much like USA did to much of the Middle East. China will not be caught unprepared like we were during the Opium Wars. …… You said: "According to Hitler the Jews were the scapegoats for Germany's problem. Is the West the scapegoat for China's ills or the containment of China ?" China is primary focused on fixing our problems (we have many) by lifting people out of poverty, building infrastructure, dealing with Covid-19, but what are Western democracies doing? USA is pointing their finger at China and scapegoating China for their catastrophic failure to handle the Covid-19 situation in their lands. And US Allies like Canada, Britain and Australia are jumping on the anti-China bandwagon, because all USA needs to say is "Jump!" and it's allies respond with "How high?" …… You said: "This could prove problematic because the idea of containment comes from China and not the West." Excuse me, but why could it prove problematic? Because it comes from China? China only has a handful of overseas bases, whereas USA has over 400-800 overseas military bases encircling China, in a seeming attempt to contain China's rise. Source: List of countries with overseas military bases wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_overseas_military_bases …… You said: "In the West we would want a China that plays by the rules of International Governance and Laws and be a honest broker, stops hostage diplomacy, respects other countries Sovereignty (Phillipines) and remembers that foreign investments in China by foreigners have greatly helped China grow." And China's goal is the eventual rejuvenation of the Chinese civilization. China clearly supports international organisations like World Health Organization, in dealing with the pandemic, it's countries like USA rejecting the WHO, that's against international organisations. China has also been commited to upholding the 2017 Paris Climate Accord unlike Trump who promised to bring coal power back to the USA. The sovereignty issue between China and the Phillipines is a bilateral (country to country) issue and doesn't involve Westerners democracies who aren't claimants to those territories. You said: "China must recognize that direct foreign investment has helped China increase it's standard of living predicated by investments and ideas from market economics." And similarly, Western countries must recognise that Made-in-China products is what help kept the cost of living in Western countries low, yet we have anti-China Westerners shouting "Boycott Chinese Goods!" You also boasted about innovation, market economy, competition, yet when Nortel lost the competition to Huawei, suddenly Huawei is to blame for Nortel losing? And Chinese mastered train technology and outcompeted Japanese train technology through a competitive market economy, yet you're suggesting Chinese industry as predatory and opportunistic? Why boast about free market, innovation and competition, when you yourself are unprepared to be on the losing side of competition?
    1
  22777.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "What does Xi Jinping want to have the World show China deference and in the Asia Pacific it's China's way or the highway ? Is that the true way for a country with 5000 years of civilization to act ?" All China wants is the eventual rejuvenation of the Chinese civilization and be afforded the respect deserving of such a status. All in all, China's rise to power has been remarkably peaceful compared to Westerners' rise through brutal colonisation, genocide and occupation of territory even till today. The point is that the Western "Yellow Peril" mindset never died out. Since 19th century, Westerners have grown so accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-liberal democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many Westerners to fathom. …… You said: "This is what I feel the West is concerned about, a vindictive China bend on revenge for being humiliated ? I feel that this is victimization and serves no purpose." Who caused the humiliation in the first place? And what's wrong with China seeking to restore Chinese national pride? If China can someday surpass the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this eventual goal of ours? And about victimisation and scapegoating, the USA is suffering from what's called "political stagnation" where there is ineffective leadership, hesitation, stalemate, and loss of American identity. American leaders are unable to provide social cohesion, an ideological programme, economic prosperity, morale, law and order, and progress. There is increased scapegoating (blaming China for America's woes) and victimisation (claiming USA is a victim of China) and so forth. It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. But what do USA's allies like Canada and Australia have to gain by antagonising the apparent upcoming power China?
    1
  22778.  @thevirusfactory2332  Have you thrown away all your Made-in-China products, devices, TVs, appliances, computers, electronics, shoes, clothing, etc? Even those products containing Made-in-China parts? Otherwise you haven't decoupled from China, why don't you start by doing it at home?
    1
  22779.  @thevirusfactory2332  Search YouTube for Huawei P30 Pro Camera Zoom on a chess game
    1
  22780.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "Respect the rulings of the International High Court in the Hague. It is the World Court predicated on the Law." What's this "International High Court in the Hague" are you talking about? The arbitral ruling was conducted by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which is a non-UN agency it only shares the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Source: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1989486/united-nations-stresses-separation-hague-tribunal The United Nations clarified on its Chinese microblog yesterday that the tribunal that ruled against China’s historic claims over the disputed South China Sea was not a UN agency. The Permanent Court of Arbitration rents space in the same building as the UN’s International Court of Justice, but the two organisations are not related. So why are you confusing the PCA with the ICJ when the two organisations are unrelated? The PCA doesn't have the same level of jurisdiction over sovereignty issues as there ICJ, so since the arbitral ruling was made by a non-UN agency, then China reserves the right not to adhere to PCA's ruling. …… You said: "Respect other countries Sovereignty and I point out here the Philippines, which also has a right to feed it's people (South China Sea) China has given the Philippines a very hard time and that is unfair to the Philippines, which doesn't have the economies of scale like China." Territorial sovereignty isn't determined by which country is bigger or smaller. China has to support the world's largest population, we have more people to feed than Philippines, so what's you argument here? You're just unreasonably biased against China that's all and take other countries side against China.
    1
  22781.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "By the way, when President Xi meet President Obama at the White House in the fall of 2015, he said in a press conference, at the Rose Garden, that he wouldn't militarize the artificial islands in the South China Sea, he lied in front of the media." In 2015, Xi Jinping publicly said: "Relevant construction activities that China are undertaking in the Nansha (Spratly) Islands do not target or impact any country, and China does not intend to pursue militarization." so how exactly did President Xi lied? His words indicate that he did not guarantee any promise not to militarise the South China Sea. The fact that USA constant sends warships like destroyers and aircraft carrier strike groups halfway across the globe to South China Sea waters, is what drove China to deploy missiles to the South China Sea Islands, because USA doesn't respect Chinese territorial claims in the SCS. …… You said: "China is not a "near Polar Nation" and must respect those countries who are, including, my country Canada. China has no expertise in the Arctic and will not just go to the Arctic because it is interested in the Arctic and establish itself there just because it wants to. Canadians, were rather insulted when China had plans for the Arctic and declared itself " a near polar nation" , hello China you are not an Arctic Nation, China you can request to work in the Arctic only if the Arctic Nations say that it is ok to do so. Is that not fair ?" China is not a full Arctic nation like you said, but China is a near-Arctic state just like 12 other near-Arctic states on the Artic Council (Germany, Netherlands, Poland, United Kingdom, France, Spain, India, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Switzerland). wikipedia.org/wiki/Arctic_Council In 1925, China signed the Spitsbergen Treaty allowing commercial activities in that region. In 1996, China joined the International Arctic Science Committee. In 2013, China became an observer on the Arctic Council. So far, China has been contributing to scientific research and study of arctic waters, lifeforms, etc, what's your problem with China conducting studies and science missions on the Arctic regions?
    1
  22782.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "As a Canadian we lived next door to the United States sometimes this is not easy for us but let me be clear we are our own country with our own way of life and we have made clear to the United States that we will do what is in our own best interests." Then why did Canada arrest Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou at the behest of the United States? A total of 111 countries have signed extradition treaties with the U.S., and dozens among them received extradition requests, but none of them followed through, except for Canada. From September to December 2018, Meng traveled to France, Britain, Ireland, Poland, Singapore, Japan and Belgium. All 7 countries have a bilateral agreement on extradition with the U.S, yet it was Canada who that accepted the U.S. extradition, this clearly shows that Canada is mixing politics with business here. Arresting Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou is clearly not in Canada's best interests, so why did Canada do that? You accused China of hostage diplomacy, when Canada is the one who started this whole mess by arresting Meng Wanzhou even Meng did not break any Canadian laws while in Canada? …… You said: "As a Canadian I would want to see a China that doesn't want to remake either Asia into it's own image." China doesn't want to see our country remade into just another Western democracy, yet why are Westerners like you continually calling for China to abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Western countries are the ones trying to remake China into a Western brand of democracy, yet you're accusing China of remaking Asia into its own image? For the record, China is literally the continent of Asia, why would China even need to remake Asia in our own image? China IS Asia, we are a big chunk of the Asian continent after all, much of Asian culture, festivals, traditional clothing, architecture comes from China itself. It's the Western "Yellow Peril" that's driving many Westerners fear of China. Since the 19th century, Westerners have grown accustomed to Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-liberal democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many Westerners to fathom.
    1
  22783.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "The United States of America is not in decline that is a narrative being pushed by China and Russia through media on a ongoing basis." The United States is no longer the only uncontested superpower to dominate in every domain in every region of the world. According to the Asia Power Index 2020, within Asia, the United States still takes the lead on the military capacity, cultural influence, resilience and defense networks, but falls behind China in four parameters: economic resources, future resources, economic relationships, and diplomatic influence. Shrinking military advantages, deficit spending, geopolitical overreach, and a shift in moral, social, and behavioral conditions have been associated with American decline. Many economists believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's some time in the foreseeable future. The trajectories are pretty much set and as long as China is able to sustain growth, China is expected to surpass the United States someday in the future. As Canadians, shouldn't you work towards Canada's interests rather than stick with the sinking ship? What good does it do for Canada to antagonist the apparent upcoming superpower China? You keep saying Canada respects China, but how? When you keep siding against China? …… You said: "The world's reserve currency is still the US dollar and America is still very innovative and has a higher standard of living per capita income than China." Not for much longer, with the way the United States keeps on printing money and "weaponizing the Dollar" to preserve its global economic and geopolitical position. Just like how USA is using the transaction of US dollars by Huawei as an excuse to arrest Meng Wanzhou. China is offering an alternative reserve currency to the tyranny of the US Dollar. As China's economy grows, so too, does the Chinese Yuan gain recognition and on 2015, the International Monetary Fund announced that it awarded the Yuan status as a reserve currency. …… You said: "American Universities are still some of the best in the World and sought after by Chinese Mainland students." While this is true for now, overseas educated Chinese are slowly learning how Western universities operate and bringing that knowledge back to China. China has also been a top destination for international students and as of 2013, China was the most popular country in Asia for international students and ranked third overall among countries that host the most international students. Source: China ranks third among countries that host the most international students, Institute of International Educational reports usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/2013/10/08/explore-the-worlds-top-universities
    1
  22784.  @peterhanssens7260  China's ghost cities are slowly being filled up. For example, in 2011, London’s Daily Mail reported that Zhengzhou was China’s largest ghost city. But today, Zhengzhou has a has a population of 10,120,000 inhabitants, and had a GDP of 1,014 billion(RMB) in 2018. Don't believe me? Here's a short 4min video of beautiful Zhengzhou: youtu.be/jFdLkgDS-QE?t=8 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience) China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/b8cCsUBYSkw
    1
  22785.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "But for me, I think that China would be better off without Xi Jinping and replace him, with a moderate like Premier Lie Kajing." Canada would be better served without Justin Trudeu, he's just a lapdog for the USA, arresting Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou on US orders, even though it brought absolutely no benefit to Canada's interests and started this whole mess. …… You said: "The Premier comes across as more truthful and less of an ego. Xi is too much of a hyper marxist leninist and in this day and age, that mindset is dated." About the whole Capitalism versus Communism debate, it's no secret today that Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can theoretically produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, for everyone on the planet. Yet we still have starvation, homelessness, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, because under capitalism, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." The Earth's resources are finite and while capitalism seeks to exhaust them, communism is dedicated to allocating resources according to needs.
    1
  22786.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "By the way, the United States has yet to make a decision regarding the Winter Games of 2022. I personally don't want Canada to attend, for obvious rights." The USA is NOT Canada, neither is Canada the USA, so why should Canada follow the US's decision on whether to boycott Beijing Winter Olympics 2022? How does that serve Canada's interests to boycott the Winter Olympics? Yet you claim Canada is not a lapdog of the US? You said you want Canada to be boycott the Winter Olympics, "for obvious rights" well have you actually been to Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region and see what life is like there for yourself? Then why do you want Canada not to attend based on something you never actually witnessed yourself? Did you know that on Xinjiang, the Uighurs drive cotton-harvesting tractors to harvest truckloads of cotton, yet Western allegations of forced labour in Xinjiang cotton picking still persist? Video: Uighurs driving cotton-harvesting tractors in Xinjiang youtu.be/ocVn5Cn101M
    1
  22787.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "The reason being the over 2 year detention of the two Michaels, nothing more." The solution is so simple. Just get Canada to release Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou and put her on board the first flight back to China. Then China might consider releasing the two detained Canadians. Canada holding Meng hostage clearly does not benefit Canada's interests, Meng's detention benefits the US interests, not Canada's. From the way Cyrus Janssen describes it, whose knows we might see Meng Wanzhou released and returned back to China. If China decides to release the 2 detained Canadians, then China-Canada relations might even be restored in time for the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics.
    1
  22788.  @peterhanssens7260  A total of 111 countries have signed extradition treaties with the U.S., and dozens among them received extradition requests, but none of them followed through, except for Canada. From September to December 2018, Meng traveled to France, Britain, Ireland, Poland, Singapore, Japan and Belgium. All 7 countries have a bilateral agreement on extradition with the U.S, yet it was Canada who that accepted the U.S. extradition, this clearly shows that Canada is mixing politics with business here. Source: news.cgtn.com/news/2020-09-05/Canada-the-only-country-willing-to-detain-Huawei-CFO-Chinese-diplomat-TxrPEnTnUs/index.html
    1
  22789.  @peterhanssens7260  Westerners been polluting the Earth since 200-300 years ago, back when the Industrial Revolution started in 1700-1800s. Whereas China's industrialisation only started some 40 years ago in comparison, yet you're blaming China for pollution? Besides, China is the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity, some 856.4 billion kilowatt hours a year – more than double the amount produced by Brazil, in second place. The top three is completed by Canada, which produces 376.7 billion kilowatt hours a year. Countries by hydroelectric production in 2012 1. China (856 billion kilowatts) 2. Brazil (411 billion kilowatts) 3. Canada (376 billion kilowatts) 4. USA (276 billion kilowatts) 5. Russia (164 billion kilowatts) …… Source: Which countries produce the most hydroelectric power? https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/
    1
  22790.  @peterhanssens7260  Let's apply the principles of Capitalism vs Communism in Covid-19 vaccine distribution. Because of capitalism, the developed countries are buying up all the vaccines leaving little to none for the developing countries. Canada for instance has pre-bought enough Covid-19 vaccines for 6-7x it's population. Imagine 1 Canadian having access to 6 Covid-19 vaccines, whereas 10 Africans have to fight over access to 1 vaccine. This is the cruel nature of capitalism at work. If rich countries monopolise the Covid-19 vaccines instead of distributing them equally, it could potentially cause more twice as many deaths. Video: How vaccine nationalism could prolong the Covid pandemic youtu.be/ABg5uumb7do Imagine that if hypothetically, the world is communistic instead of capitalistic. Then the limited vaccine supply would distributed according to needs under principles of communism, resulting in less deaths, than had the rich countries hoarded vaccines for themselves. With Covid-19, none of us is safe, until all of us are safe. It's mathematically more efficient to vaccinate some people in all countries, rather than all people in some countries.
    1
  22791.  @peterhanssens7260  Meng Wanzhou travelled to 7 different countries that all share extradition treaties with the USA and they all rejected the extradition request, only Canada accepted when there was no need to. You keep boasting Canada is not a lapdog of the US, then why did Canada accept the request that doesn't benefit Canada's interests? And what makes you so sure that the 2 Canadians did not break any Chinese laws while in China? Earlier you boasted about Canadian rule of law, now you self-proclaim the innocence of the 2 Canadians, completely disregarding any rule of law whatsoever? You said one of the Canadians is fond of China, works for conflict resolution, speaks fluent Mandarin, then why the heck would the government arrest such a person like you said?
    1
  22792.  @peterhanssens7260  "神州 Shenzhou I have a scenario for you … do you think that the CCP would agreed to let, say a Japanese Company bid and win a contract to build infrastructure in China which would be an all in deal, that would only include Japanese engineering and support services to completion?" …… My answer: Who built the first high speed rail in China, if not Japanese companies?
    1
  22793.  @peterhanssens7260  You base my whole vaccine scenario on Canada securing a deal with China? Canada is a developed country, not a poor country, I'm talking about distribution vaccines according to needs according to the principles of communism, not like in capitalism where the rich countries buy up and hoard all the vaccines for themselves, leaving little for the developing countries. Like I said, imagine 1 Canadian having access to 6 vaccines, whereas 10 Africans having to fight over access to 1 vaccine. This is capitalism at work, communism seeks to distribute resources according to needs.
    1
  22794.  @peterhanssens7260  Arresting Meng Wanzhou did not offer any strategic benefits to Canada's interests. Those 7 countries with extradition treaties with the USA that Meng visited, also do business with USA, yet they did not accept the US extradition request and USA did not retaliate against them in any form. Only Canada foolishly (admitted by you) accepted the extradition request, and what did USA do in gratitude? Nothing! Trump wanted to use Meng as a "bargaining chip" against China, meaning that they didn't care about the crime, if they were willing to let go, if they could get favorable terms in the economic deal with China. Yet Canada refused to consider this and just accepted US extradition like a lapdog. You boasted that Canada is not a lapdog of the US, but Canada's actions seem to indicate that you are. You bragged about Canada following the rule of law, then how can you just self-proclaim the 2 Canadians are innocent, completely voiding the rule of law? Based on their foundation? I can also make the same claim as you for Meng Wanzhou, that Meng did not break any Canadian laws while in Canada, and that Canadian border police violated Meng's rights. When the Canadian police arrested Meng, she wasn't given the opportunity to contact her lawyer for advice, she had her devices confiscated, unlocked, the contents viewed and searched illegally. Yet you bragged about Canada following the rule of law? That Canada is not a lapdog of the US? The USA is targeting Huawei in order to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride that's all, yet Canada can't see that?
    1
  22795.  @peterhanssens7260  The World’s Top Reserve Currencies in 2019 1. U.S. Dollar: $6.74 trillion (61.82%) 2. Euro: $2.21 trillion (20.24%) 3. Japanese Yen: $572 billion (5.25%) 4. Pound Sterling: $495 billion (4.54%) 5. Chinese Renminbi: $213 billion (1.95%) …… The thing is, China's economy is growing and expected to someday surpass the United States in the foreseeable future. By then the Chinese Yuan will grow in power, possibly displacing the US Dollar, it's inevitable that a country's growing economy increases the value of its currency as a reserve currency. China is the world's leading producer of rare earth metals at some 90% of all the world's production comes from China. Even if other countries starting producing rare earth metals of their own, they can't match China's prices, so the cost of products like circuits, chips, lithium batteries, solar panels, LEDs, will be more expensive if other sources of rare earth metals are used apart China.
    1
  22796.  @peterhanssens7260  You boast about free markets, innovation and competition, yet when Nortel lost the competition to Huawei, why are you blaming Huawei for winning the competition? Just like how Chinese companies eventually mastered Japanese train technology, that's the nature of competition, yet you're suggest that Chinese industry is predatory and opportunistic? What biased double standards is this? When Western companies win, it's free market, but when Chinese companies win, it's assumed through unfair means? As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html
    1
  22797.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "If you take out a mortgage you have a contractual obligation with the bank." What mortgage did Canada took out from the USA? Those 7 countries that Meng visited all have so-called "mortgages" with the USA, yet they did not accept the US extradition request and USA did not punish them in retaliation. Only Canada foolishly did, yet you bragged Canada is not a US lapdog? How? Canada's actions don't match your words. You believe that Donald Trump is a fool, then why did Trudeu follow along with the US extradition request, when he could have rejected it like those 7 other countries that Meng visited? The USA elected a fool for president, yet Canadian PM just adhere to the US extradition request? You want to show that Canada is not the US lapdog, then prove it through actions not words. Because Canada's so far, indicates that it's a lapdog, they're doing things for US's interests, not Canada's interest. You said Trump has no filter, that implies he's speaking the truth when he wanted to use Meng Wanzhou as a "bargaining chip" that means USA doesn't really care about the fabricated crime, they just want to strong arm China to get a better trade deal with our country that's all. And they used Canada to take all the blame, and offer no rescue to Canada, that's how you know Canada is merely a tool in US eyes. You want to prove Canada is not a lapdog, prove it through actual actions, not words. Lastly, you bragged about Canada following the rule of law, then why are you skipping the whole process and self-proclaiming the innocence of the 2 Canadians, when the verdict isn't out yet? You can't just proclaim people are innocent because they work in promoting relations or speak Mandarin fluently, what sort of evidence is speaking Mandarin fluently proof of someone's innocence? By your own logic, Meng Wanzhou is innocent because she speaks Mandarin fluently. Why detain Meng when she did not break any Canadian laws while in Canada? Meng herself wasn't even informed about what alleged crime she commited the Canadian border police just arrest her since 2018 and only in 2020-2021 (2-3 years later) is her court hearing finally happening.
    1
  22798.  @peterhanssens7260  Chinese Renminbi ranks higher as a reserve currency than Canadian and Australian dollars. The point is that US Dollar is backed by nothing after 1963 when the gold standard was removed. That means that USA can literally print more US Dollars with impunity, and countries still value this printed bills backed by nothing. The USA made a deal with Saudi Arabia to tag the US Dollar to oil prices and through this, the USA is weaponizing the US Dollar against countries that refuse to do the the US bidding. China has been using the last 15 years to make the Renminbi a credible currency. If one day China decides to create a gold-back Yuan, that will seriously challenge the US Dollar backed by nothing. Source: Gold-backed yuan may challenge flagging dollar asiatimes.com/2020/08/gold-backed-yuan-may-challenge-flagging-dollar/
    1
  22799.  @peterhanssens7260  China is switching to automation to help keep production costs low and remain competitive in the field. China is already the world's largest market for robotics and automation and we recently unveiled Asia's first fully-automated container port in Port of Qingdao, East China. Video: Asia's 1st automated container terminal in E China youtu.be/_ff9tQuUzcw At the Port of Qingdao, containers are unloaded automatically and not a single worker is present. It cuts 85% labour force and improves efficiency by 30%. It's quicker and much safer compared to manual operation. It can even operate at night, 24/7 and in complete darkness, loading and unloading cargo. It has automated anchoring, automatic assembling and disassembling functions and can accommodate the world's largest 24,000-TEU container ships and its annual designed capacity reached 5.2 min TEU.
    1
  22800.  @peterhanssens7260  You disagree with the veracity of China's unemployment levels, then where's your verified source showing the true figure? All you do is to mock China's statistics then where's your figure? I can also make the same claim that Canada's unemployment figures aren't the true figures. Statistics Canada says 13% of Canadians aren’t working — but the true number is more like 30% according to thestar.com/business/opinion/2020/05/09/statcan-says-13-of-canadians-arent-working-but-the-true-number-is-more-like-30.html
    1
  22801.  @peterhanssens7260  China is the world's largest market for automation, the World's Biggest Automated Cargo Wharf Yangshan Deep-water Port Starts Operation in Shanghai youtu.be/IzOeAGAu60k Yangshan deep water port will be equipped with 130 driverless automated guided vehicles (AGV), 26 overhead cranes and 120 rail-mounted gantry cranes. The core technology of the robotic port was developed independently by China.
    1
  22802.  @peterhanssens7260  So Canadian unemployment statistics are realistic, but somehow Chinese unemployment statistics aren't? What biased double standards is this? Where's your evidence of China's true unemployment statistics if you dispute the government statistics?
    1
  22803.  @peterhanssens7260  You yourself agree that Trump is a fool, then why did Trudeu accept the US extradition request, where 7 other countries with similar extradition treaties that Meng visited, rejected the US extradition request? It's like "being led by a fool, rather than leading a group of fools." The fact that Canada doesn't even think ahead before accepting the request, shows political motivation (I mean, you're involving the USA, how's that not political?) not just legal call. The fact that Trump doesn't have a filter, that he frankly wants to use Meng as a "bargaining chip", shows that USA doesn't even care about the alleged crime, they set a trap that Canada willingly fell into, like a lapdog. You boast about honoring Canada's obligations, does the USA even care about Canada's obligation? They don't. USA don't even bother to rescue Canada after they made Canada take the blame for Meng's arrest, Trump's unfiltered remarks show USA doesn't care whether Meng's extradition pulls through or not. Even the new Biden administration is in no rush to bring up Meng's extradition, goes to show how little USA actually cares about Canada honoring some obligation. Yet you want to claim Canada isn't a lapdog of the USA? Prove it through actions, not words.
    1
  22804.  @peterhanssens7260  So because 2 Chinese told you that Chinese people are hypersensitive to criticism, means that it's true? I have shown that Canada is a lapdog of the USA, you got angry, even though your unable to counter my points about how 7 countries with US extradition treaties that Meng visited, rejected US request, only Canada foolishly (by your own admittance) took up US extradition request. Trump without a filter, said that USA is only using Meng as a bargaining chip, that USA is doesn't really care about the alleged crime. Yet you speak about honoring obligations, but USA doesn't reciprocate Canada, they didn't rescue Canada, even the new Biden administration is in no hurry to raise Meng Wanzhou issue.
    1
  22805.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "Why China didn't even consider the ruling of the High Court of the Hague to the admissibility of China's claim ?" What "High Court of the Hague" are you talking about? The arbitral ruling was by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which is not an official UN-agency it only shares the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) but the two organisations are unrelated. The Permanent Court of Arbitration rents space in the same building as the UN’s International Court of Justice, but the two organisations are not related. United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1989486/united-nations-stresses-separation-hague-tribunal Since the ruling was made by a non-UN agency like PCA (instead of ICJ) then China reserves the right not to adhere to it's ruling on issues of sovereignty.
    1
  22806.  @peterhanssens7260  You said: "Please tell me otherwise why for example Chins took the whole of the South China Sea unilaterally without consulting it's neighbours?" China first claimed the South China Sea Islands back in 1947 when Republic of China 🇹🇼 published the 11th Dash Line (of which PRC's 🇨🇳 9 Dash Line is based upon) and nobody complained about China's claims, not Vietnam, not Philippines, not the USA. The North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    1
  22807.  @thevirusfactory2332  It's your own athletes loss if you choose to boycott Beijing Winter Olympics. Your loss.
    1
  22808.  @thevirusfactory2332  Huawei is one of the world's most successful Chinese companies, the Americans are afraid of Huawei's rise so they block Huawei 5G in order to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride that's all.
    1
  22809.  @haroldshipman5419  China has 5000 years of history and today, China has transformed from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into an economic powerhouse, the world's factory (Made in China) a growing scientific and technological power, protected by the largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. Over 50 years ago, nobody expected "communist" China to succeed yet fast forward to today and China has defied all expectations of failure and emerged as a potential rival to the United States.
    1
  22810.  @thevirusfactory2332  Have you destroyed all your Made-in-China products after you proclaim "BOYCOTT EVERYTHING CHINA"? Especially those containing Rare Earth metals (of which China controls 90% of all production) which are used in phone screens, computer screens, TV screens, DVDs, LCD, LED lights, X-ray machines, MRI machines, magnets, lasers, fibre optics, rechargeable batteries, hard drives, hybrid cars, rocket engines, jet engines, wind turbines, etc. So make sure you get rid of any product that contains Rare Earth metals, since you want to boycott everything China.
    1
  22811. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  22812. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  22813.  @mfernandez4869  "神州 Shenzhou Congratulations you will receive extra social credit points for your comment!! Way to go comrade." You really think the Social Credit system exists in China? Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  22814. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  22815.  @mfernandez4869  The Philippines was invaded by the US and even made into a American colony (much like Hawaii) but China has never invaded the Philippines, what are you talking about?
    1
  22816. I agree with The Guillotine. In the UK, the age limit for gender change has fallen from 10 years to a mere 3 years. Kids aged 3, can already apply for gender change and with their parent's approval. At such tender age of 3-8 years, and these children can already determine that they are born in the wrong body? While they are only allowed to formally decide at puberty, they have already been pumped with hormones prior to puberty, and such hormones is bound to influence their choice of gender identity. Source: NHS treating transgender kids aged just 3 mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/nhs-treating-transgender-kids-aged-5475663
    1
  22817. As far as I know, other Asian countries like Japan and Singapore don't have vaccine mandates for the elderly either, so the vaccine mandate may not be the solution.
    1
  22818.  @mbr8167  China's "debt-trap diplomacy" has been debunked by experts. The narrative wrongfully portrays both Beijing and the developing countries it deals with. "Our research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country, much less the port of Hambantota." ... Source: There Is No Chinese 'Debt Trap' - The Atlantic
    1
  22819.  @mbr8167  China's "debt-trap diplomacy" has been debunked by experts as a myth . The narrative wrongfully portrays both Beijing and the developing countries it deals with. "Our research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country, much less the port of Hambantota." ... Source: The Chinese ‘Debt Trap’ Is a Myth
    1
  22820.  @mbr8167  China's "debt-trap diplomacy" has been debunked by experts as a myth. R esearch shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country. ... Source: The Chinese ‘Debt Trap’ Is a Myth
    1
  22821.  @mbr8167  China's "debt-trap diplomacy" has been debunked by experts. The narrative wrongfully portrays both Beijing and the developing countries it deals with. "Our research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country, much less the port of Hambantota." ... Source: There Is No Chinese 'Debt Trap' - The Atlantic
    1
  22822.  @mbr8167  China's "debt-trap diplomacy" has been debunked by experts. The narrative wrongfully portrays both Beijing and the developing countries it deals with. "Our research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country, much less the port of Hambantota." ... Source: There Is No Chinese 'Debt Trap' - The Atlantic
    1
  22823.  @kevintewey1157  China has a bad historical run-in with psychoactive drugs including cannabis. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us. Hopefully, you'll understand the stigma associated with psychoactive drugs like cannabis in China based on our history and of its illegality in China.
    1
  22824.  @mbr8167  China's "debt-trap diplomacy" has been debunked by experts. The narrative wrongfully portrays both Beijing and the developing countries it deals with. "Our research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country, much less the port of Hambantota." ... Source: There Is No Chinese 'Debt Trap' - The Atlantic
    1
  22825.  @mbr8167  China's "debt-trap diplomacy" has been debunked by experts. The narrative wrongfully portrays both Beijing and the developing countries it deals with. "Our research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country, much less the port of Hambantota." ... Source: There Is No Chinese 'Debt Trap' - The Atlantic
    1
  22826.  @mbr8167  China's "debt-trap diplomacy" has been debunked by experts. The narrative wrongfully portrays both Beijing and the developing countries it deals with. "Our research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country, much less the port of Hambantota." ... Source: There Is No Chinese 'Debt Trap' - The Atlantic
    1
  22827.  @kevintewey1157  China has a bad historical run-in with psychoactive drugs including cannabis. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  22828.  @kevintewey1157  China has a bad historical run-in with psychoactive drugs including cannabis. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  22829. @CJ S The name "East Turkestan" is a fake name coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists (including Nikita Bichurin) who intended the name to replace the common Western term for the region, Chinese Turkestan. So the territory was originally associated with China, but was given a new name in order to attempt to separate the region from the mainland. When the Mongols conquered Song Dynasty China, they choose to incorporate both Inner and Outer Mongolia as part of China. The Manchu conquerors also incorporated both Mongolias into Qing Dynasty. The People's Republic of China reconquered Inner Mongolia after the fall of Qing Dynasty, so even though it has that name, it's still part of China, much like Manchuria is part of China today. As for portions of India, if you refer to Aksai Chin, the first part, aksai means ""white stone desert" and Chin refers to China.
    1
  22830.  @mbr8167  "神州 Shenzhou "Experts" Thank you for your opinion bot." I quoted actual articles by Lowy Institute and Chatham House debunking the myth of China's "debt-trap diplomacy" yet you're calling me a bot?
    1
  22831.  @mbr8167  "神州 Shenzhou We didn't win in Iraq. We wanted them in the end to govern themselves, that's not what they wanted." The Iraqi's had a leader of their own, now they have U.S puppet government, how is that governing themselves? As for Afghanistan, the democratically elected Afghan President Ghani fled the country with carloads of U.S cash, after the shambolic U.S withdrawal from Kabul, and the 300,000 strong Afghan Army surrendered in just weeks with minimal resistance to the Taliban, it means that overall, the Afghans do not want the democracy that the U.S imposed on them.
    1
  22832.  @distinctga5811  You said: "The media is independent." Western MSM like BBC, CNN, Fox News, are sponsored by political parties or companies seeking to promote their agenda, and everyone knows that the news reporters in those media have to tow the line that their sponsors paid them to. Take America for example, according to surveys, around two-thirds of Americans say they’ve seen their own news sources report facts meant to favor one side, so if anything, this indicates that American MSM is not independent. Only the small channels that report a different point of view from the mainstream could be considered independent. Even then, their voices are being clamped down as "disinformation" by the West.
    1
  22833.  @distinctga5811  You said: "The media is independent." No it isn't. Western MSM cannot say things that go against their sponsors.
    1
  22834.  @distinctga5811  You said: "The media is independent." C'mon, you seriously believe Western MSM is independent? Two-thirds of U.S. adults say they’ve seen the news sources they turn to most often present factual information that favors one side of an issue in coverage of the 2020 election, so if anything, isn't this indication that it is not independent?
    1
  22835.  @distinctga5811  Do you really think the Western media is independent? Why is it that they have to tow the line and cannot say anything that goes against their sponsors?
    1
  22836.  @distinctga5811  "The media is independent." No it isn't, they cannot say anything that goes against their sponsors.
    1
  22837.  @distinctga5811  "神州 Shenzhou The people in Kabul supported the US effort to modernize, especially the woman." They had no choice, they were occupied by a foreign power (USA) seeking to impose their own Western ideology (liberal-democracy) onto Kabul, who's population makes up only 10% of the entire Afghan population. You said: "The tribal people in the mountains came in and reasserted their dominance over the female population." The tribal people in the mountains made up around 90% of Afghan's entire population. Most Afghans live in rural areas in tribal and kinship groups and only around 10% of the population lives in the capital city, Kabul. So whether you like it or not, the tribal Afghans are the majority in this equation. You said: "Considering your support of the Taliban, as depicted by your stance in this comment section, you probably enjoyed the videos of woman getting stoned in Afghanistan." What has this even got to do with the discussion at hand? It's the people of Afghanistan who have chosen Taliban rule after the U.S's shambolic withdrawal from Kabul, with the 300,000-strong Afghan Army laying down arms instead of fighting to defend "liberal democracy". Also, the Taliban claims the footage is from the same October 2015 stoning recorded previously. But the Taliban said it was not involved and that the stoning had been carried out by a pro-government militia commander, Sa’eedi Yar.
    1
  22838.  @distinctga5811  You said: "Also, Saddam invaded Iran and Kuwait and bombed Israel. If he didn't want problems with the US he shouldn't have invaded it's allies." You're saying Iran is a U.S ally? Then why the U.S slapped sanctions on Iran if it was supposedly a U.S ally? Why'd the U.S even walked out of the Iran Nuclear Deal? As for Kuwait, many Americans weren't even interested in it, until there appeared a testimony provided by a young girl (named Nayirah) which was widely publicized, and was cited numerous times by American senators and President George H. W. Bush in their rationale to support Kuwait in the Gulf War. But it later turned out it the testimony was fake, it was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S and this was used to manufacture "consent for war". Much like how later the former President Bush had invaded Iraq on suspicion of harboring Weapons of Mass Destruction, despite no WMDs ever been found after Iraq War. You said: "Also, 200,000 civilians may have died as a result of the conflict, but you forgot the part where 40 million people were liberated." Liberated from what? Instead of Iraq having their own leader, they have one of the U.S puppets installed into their government. You sound like the late Margaret Albright who justified that the killing of half a million kids for containing Saddam as a price worth paying.
    1
  22839.  @TimeKiller.No1  你有没有把我误认为别人吗？这是我第一次见到你哦。
    1
  22840.  @michaelkatz275  Previous Western journalists since 1990s have been making similar claims about China's real estate and financial sector, yet all their predictions of a "hard landing" in did not come to pass in China, so how is it different this time? You said: "I don't suppose that you know anything about the run on banks that had to be put down by the Peoples Armed Police by any chance." The PAP is a special paramilitary force different from the regular People's Police, but how have they been involved in any run on banks? In the Henan bank protests, it was the Henan police that were mobilized, not the PAP.
    1
  22841.  @nolaserv  Those rural banks were taken control by a criminal gang led by mastermine Lv Yi, luring depositors with promises of annual returns as high as 18%. The Chinese government is working with the People's Bank of China, to help refund people with the first payments being sent to bank customers with a combined total of less than 50,000 yuan ($7,200) deposited at a single bank. Another round of repayments to customers will be launched focusing on those with deposits of between 400,000 yuan ($57,800) and 500,000 yuan ($72,200). Depositors who have lost more would receive an initial sum of 500,000 yuan with the remainder reserved for now, according to the regulators.
    1
  22842.  @115islandscompass6  Vietam PM Pham Van Dong had acknowledged that China's territorial waters encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands, in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. ... Source: Wikipedia: File:1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai So Vietnam had formally affirmed that Spratly and Paracel Islands were part of Chinese territorial waters, yet now they suddenly change their mind and claim those territory for themselves?
    1
  22843.  @115islandscompass6  North Vietnam took over all of Vietnam after the U.S abandoned their South Vietnamese allies during the 1975 Fall of Saigon (similar to the U.S abandoning their Afghan allies in the 2021 Fall of Kabul), so the diplomatic letter acknowledging that Chinese territorial waters encompassed Spratly and Paracel islands should still be valid in the new Vietnam. You said: "China erased only two border lines with Vietnam from among the 11 border lines (11-dash lines) drawn on the Spratly Islands." Correct, the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 removed two dashes to arrive at the 9-Dash Line after the 11-Dash Line was published by the Republic of China 🇹🇼 in 1947. However, the 9-Dash Line still encompasses the Spratly and Paracel islands and this was indicated in the diplomatic note. In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. ... Source: Wikipedia: File:1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai
    1
  22844.  @115islandscompass6  So the Republic of China 🇹🇼 drew 11-Dash Line in 1947 which encompassed Paracel and Spratly Islands and then the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 removed two dashes to arrive at the 9-Dash Line, of which North Vietnam respects. So it means North Vietnam had no qualms about China's claim encompassing the Spratly and Paracel Islands, then isn't that the same as Vietnam accepting China's 9-Dash Line?
    1
  22845.  @115islandscompass6  In 1956 North Vietnam formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese. About the same time, the PLA 🇨🇳 reestablished a Chinese garrison on Yongxing Island in the Paracels, while the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (Taipei) put troops back on Taiping Island in the Spratlys. But, that same year, South Vietnam reopened the abandoned French camp on Shanhu Island and announced that it had annexed the Paracel archipelago as well as the Spratlys. In 1974 South Vietnam attempted to enforce its claims to sovereignty by placing settlers in the Spratlys and expelling Chinese fishermen from the southwestern Paracels. In the ensuing naval battle at Shanhu Island, China defeated Vietnamese forces. This enabled Beijing to extend its control to the entire Paracel archipelago, where it has not been effectively challenged since. Five years later, Hanoi (now the capital of a united Vietnam) repudiated its earlier deference to China's claims, adopted South Vietnam's position, and claimed sovereignty over all the islands in the South China Sea. In the early 1980s, as Beijing, Kuala Lumpur, Manila, and Taipei protested, Vietnam resumed vigorous settlement and garrisoning of the Spratlys. ... (Source: Middle East Policy Council: Diplomacy on the Rocks: China and Other Claimants in the South China Sea) So if anything, it's the Vietnamese that initially accepted China's claims to the Spratly and Paracel Islands, but suddenly changed their minds, broke their words against China and started claiming those territories.
    1
  22846.  @distinctga5811  Western MSM are certain not independent, neither can they say whatever they want. Yes, sponsors are basically owners, and the MSM cannot go against the wishes of their owners. It's no secret that censorship exists on Western platforms like YouTube, FaceBook, Twitter, so why keep up the facade that its independent?
    1
  22847.  @distinctga5811  They're certain not independent, neither can they say whatever they want. Yes, their sponsors are basically owners, and they cannot go against the wishes of their owners. It's no secret that censorship exists on Western platforms like YouTube, FaceBook, Twitter, so why keep up the facade that its independent?
    1
  22848.  @noneyabeeysnass8283  Which Chinese missile flew over the skies of Taiwan island itself? Do you have actual footage of Chinese missiles over the island itself? Also the U.S test launched the Minutemen III which flew over international waters and traveled approximately 4,200 miles to the Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands.
    1
  22849.  @distinctga5811  Let's look at surveys. New research finds that hate crimes targeting the Asian American community have reached some unprecedented levels. A report published by the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism, revealed that anti-Asian hate crime increased by 339 percent last year compared to the year before, with New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles and other cities surpassing their record numbers in 2020.
    1
  22850.  @distinctga5811  "People may disagree about the "accomplishments" of the CCP," Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (i.e Made-in-China) having the world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army (the _People's Liberation Army)_and funded by the world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western media constantly denouncing China's success all along. Yet people like you look down on China's success under the CPC?
    1
  22851.  @distinctga5811  You said: "A disagreement about the CCP is very different than being against China or the Chinese." Statistics indicate that hate crimes towards Asians in the USA have increased by 339% last year. And mind you, these attacks were directed against people of Asian descent, some of whom aren't even Chinese, they are Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese, Thai, etc, and they for sure aren't even communist party members. Yet they were subjected to such crimes regardless, it just goes to show that Americans themselves (not all) are seemingly incapable of distinguishing between the people (Chinese), the government (CPC) and the country (China).
    1
  22852.  @distinctga5811  You said: "A disagreement about the CCP is very different than being against China or the Chinese." Statistics indicate that racially motivated crimes towards Asians in the USA have increased by 339% last year. And mind you, these attacks were directed against people of Asian descent, some of whom aren't even Chinese, they are Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese, Thai, etc, and they for sure aren't even communist party members themselves. Yet they were the target of such attacks.
    1
  22853.  @distinctga5811  You said: "China is a land mass, Chinese is an ethnicity, the CCP is a government the currently rules much of the Chinese population." Yet there is rising anti-China sentiment being directed towards people of Asian descent themselves, some of whom aren't even Chinese, they are Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese, Thai, but at subjected to attacks all the same.
    1
  22854.  @distinctga5811  You said: "The CCP also isn't the natural successor to the Republic of China or the Qing dynasty. What makes them the legitimate rulers of all that is Chinese?" Why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage, compared to the Nationalist Kuomintang. The KMT had massive wealth (taxed from peasants), superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. It should have been a piece of cake for the KMT to wipe out the communists given their great advantage. Yet despite all these initial advantage, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China. How is it that the CPC is not the natural successor to the Chinese civilization? You said: "many mainlanders and the people in Taiwan all hate the CCP." A long-term survey in China by Harvard University and Ash Center have revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Chinese government, what makes you think many mainlanders hate the CPC? A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    1
  22855.  @distinctga5811  "神州 Shenzhou You are kind of WAY OFF. By "Sponsors" you mean advertisers. Advertisers go to where the viewers are to sell their own products." So you've basically confirmed my point that they certainly aren't independent, they cannot go against the ones who control their purse strings. You said: "In this sense, you may say that news is 'Sensationalized' to attract more viewers." Agreed. And this embellishment can result in distortion of the truth, and Western audiences can get duped into thinking that the media is independent when it's clearly not. You said: "People don't go to a news program because they have to, they go where they want because, in America, there are many different sources of information." But the media is controlled by large for-profit corporations who reap revenue from advertising in America, this shows that it's not independent. You said: "For instance, "sponsors" on youtube are the viewers. A Youtuber isn't controlled by the viewers," A content creator is controlled by YouTube demonization, just like how Facebook posts, Twitter posts can be censored, so what more evidence do you need to show that it's not independent like you claimed? You said: "The fact that you don't understand this basic principle is unbecoming of you." More insults? The fact that you refuse to acknowledge that censorship exists on Western platforms like YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, goes to show how much you've been fooled into thinking that the media is independent.
    1
  22856.  @115islandscompass6  According to Oxford Languages, respect is defined as: -agreeing to recognize and abide by (a legal requirement). E.g "the crown and its ministers ought to respect the ordinary law."
    1
  22857.  @distinctga5811  "神州 Shenzhou Privately held companies can operate however they choose, however they are independent from one another." Then why did a bunch of privately-held social media companies like FaceBook, Twitter, Instagram, etc, all ban the former POTUS, Donald Trump from their platform? In China, the government control the corporations, but it seems like in America, it's the reverse and the corporations control the government. This also disproves your earlier claim that "EVERYONE can get on and say what they want." You said: "Chinese press freedoms are not comparable to that of American ones." You seem like you know China a lot, well have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  22858.  @distinctga5811  "神州 Shenzhou Privately held companies can operate however they choose, however they are independent from one another." Then why did a bunch of privately-held social media companies like FaceBook, Twitter, Instagram, etc, all ban the former POTUS, Donald Trump from their platform? This also disproves your earlier claim that "EVERYONE can get on and say what they want." You said: "Chinese press freedoms are not comparable to that of American ones." You seem like you know China a lot, well have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  22859.  @distinctga5811  "神州 Shenzhou Privately held companies can operate however they choose, however they are independent from one another." If they were independent, then why'd they all choose to ban the former POTUS from their platform? This also disproves your earlier claim that "EVERYONE can get on and say what they want." You said: "Chinese press freedoms are not comparable to that of American ones." You seem like you know China a lot, well have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  22860.  @distinctga5811  "神州 Shenzhou Privately held companies can operate however they choose, however they are independent from one another." Then why did a bunch of privately-held social media companies like FaceBook, Twitter, Instagram, etc, all ban the former POTUS, Donald Trump from their platform? This also disproves your earlier claim that "EVERYONE can get on and say what they want." You said: "Chinese press freedoms are not comparable to that of American ones." You seem like you know China a lot, well have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  22861.  @115islandscompass6  You said: "However, as you can see from the letter, the countries other than North Vietnam did not agree with the 12-mile width rule." Where was it mentioned in the letter that countries other than North Vietnam did not agree with the 12-mile width rule? When China published the 11-Dash Line/9-Dash Line, the other countries like Vietnam, the Philippines and even the USA accepted it. The Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence in 1946 that the Spratlys was not Philippine territory, both to not anger Chiang Kai-shek in China and because the Spratlys were not part of the Philippines per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America. There is a Map of the Treaty Limits of the Philippines published by Research Gate The Philippines, on the basis of historic right of title, claims that its territorial sea extends to the limits set forth in the colonial treaties, which define the extent of the archipelago at the time it was ceded from Spain to the U.S. in 1898. The line drawn around the archipelago marks the outer limits of the historic territorial seas of the Philippines, which will be referred to here as the Philippine Treaty Limits. ... Source: The Treaty Limits of the Philippines - ResearchGate And the Spratly Islands are not within Philippines territorial limits according to that treaty
    1
  22862.  @115islandscompass6  You said: "After that, Vietnam changed his mind. Isn't this because China has "arbitrarily" decided its territorial waters?" Look, China had issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands and Vietnam PM Pham Van Dong accepted it when he wrote the diplomatic note to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, so how is this arbitrarily? You said: "If the territorial waters were taken without arguing or permission, it is natural that problems would arise." But there was permission and no argument, since Vietnam PM Pham van Dong accepted that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were Chinese territorial waters, in the diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. Had there been objections, the Vietnam PM would have raised it. You said: "And recently, Chinese fishing boats have been poaching, ignoring even their arbitrarily determined territorial waters. So I don't think China can be called peaceful, though." As far as international law goes, poaching may be illegal, but not considered an act of war. Fishing disputes are common, even France and Britain have an ongoing fishing dispute in their territorial waters, so does China have fishing disputes with other countries. But it doesn't mean China is at war. China today is still currently at peace and not at war with any country. Which country is China currently at war with, you tell me?
    1
  22863.  @distinctga5811  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Before WW2, RoC was already the 2nd largest economy in the world" The Republic of China 🇹🇼 era was a period of turmoil. From 1913 to 1927, China disintegrated into regional warlords, fighting for authority, causing misery and disrupting growth. There was hyperinflation as the KMT issued more currency and imposed a drain on the civilian population, stirring mass unrest throughout China during this period. The inflation problem was significantly based in the KMT's failure to restore revenue sources and its printing of money to finance its deficit You said: "/10th of Japans GDP in the 1990s, despite starting behind the CCP after WW2 ended." Japan's economy was supported by U.S aid. Total Post-World War II U.S. assistance to Japan for the years of the occupation, from 1945-1952 was roughly $2.2 billion ($15.2 billion in 2005 dollars), of which almost $1.7 billion was grants and $504 million was loans. Also, Japan's WWII surrender treaty (i.e Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution) meant that Japan is only allowed to keep a self-defense force and the U.S forces stationed in Okinawa will "provide protection" for Japan. This meant that Japan's military expenditure was reduced and so the money could be channelled elsewhere, such as into developing Japan's economy. Also, after WWII, China was still involved in Korean War (1950) and Vietnam War (1955), while Japan was not directly involved because of Article 9 of its constitution, so it allowed Japan to build up its economy while China's economy was to support the war effort. Today, the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 is ranked world's 2nd largest economy, ahead of Japan's and most certainly ahead of Taiwan Island.
    1
  22864.  @distinctga5811  You said: "You see, China's rise wasn't a consequence of good governance, it was a product of US globalization." Nope, China's rise was a result of our own good governance. Compare China to India for example, India is the world's largest democracy and 2nd most populous country after China, so it has a huge workforce just like China. Many Indians speak English (more favorable for Westerners) while many Chinese today still struggle with English. India. Republic of India was founded in 1947, while People's Republic of China was founded 2 years later in 1949, so India had a headstart over China. Also, India is a Western style democracy while China isn't. Yet despite this, China has surpassed India in many sectors such as economy, development, infrastructure, scientific research, technology exports, and so on. So isn't China's rise because of good governance? Because if it were a result of U.S globalization, then India would be the same as China (if not better). But this is clearly not the case in reality. You said: "A complete cut off of western high tech imports and China will start falling apart at the seems." China literally exports more high tech products than any other in the world, are you sure it's not other countries that will fall apart here? Countries by High-Technology Exports in 2019 1. China ($731 billion) 2. Hong Kong SAR, ($330 billion) 3. Germany ($210 billion) 4. South Korea ($192 billion) 5. United States ($156 billion) 6. Singapore ($155 billion) 7. France ($117 billion) 8. Japan ($111 billion) 9. Malaysia ($90 billion) 10. Netherlands ($85 billion) ... Source: YouTube: Top 20 Country by High-Technology Exports (1989-2019) You said: "The CCP manipulates you into thinking their hand is much stronger than it actually is, however their own information bubble has made them delusional about their capacities. They lie to the people and inadvertently misguide their own government and, subsequently, strategies. Chinese generals themselves have warned the CCP that they are overplaying their hand." Do you actually have evidence of your claims? Many people living in China have have found our living standards increased under communist party leadership. According to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty. As for the information bubble, Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, before 2019, everybody has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending money on your tourist industries. Western schools and universities were positively flooded with Chinese international students studying the same topics as their peers, and Chinese investors are buying up real estate in other countries. So what makes you think Chinese are being misguided? Chinese can be found all over the world since we make up 20% of the world's population after all. But have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  22865.  @distinctga5811  You said: "Japan is more competent than China despite China having 10 times the population." China is home to the world's largest high-speed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen high speed rail (HSR) in terms of track length. Our trains are very advanced and the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have posted videos of their HSR trips, balancing coins on their edges on the window sill while traveling at 350 kph with the coin remaining upright, in order to showcase the smoothness of the journey. Here's a list of countries by HSR construction in 2019 1. China (38,207km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. France (3,870 km) 4. Germany (3,596 km) 5. Japan (3,422 km) 6. Russia (2,026 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,997 km) 8. Italy (1,697 km) 9. South Korea (1,481 km) 10. Finland (744 km) ... Source: YouTube: High-Speed Railway (HSR) Construction by Country (1965-2019) You said: "Also, engaging in disputes with India over their mountain ranges is sheer and obvious stupidity." The Indians themselves should agree to negotiate with China to put an end to the border conflict, but sadly, many Indians still suffer from a "colonial mentality" of worshiping Anglo-Saxon culture and values, while harboring a disdain for anything non-white. Even though India has physically decolonized, the "decolonizing of the mind" needs to take place to heal the damage inflicted by the colonizer on the minds of the colonized. Otherwise, their actions continue to serve their colonial master's interests instead of their own.
    1
  22866.  @distinctga5811  You said: "Then Taiwan and Hong Kong as well as Iran." Taiwan and Hong Kong are part of China so of course China will take absolute interest when the U.S attempts to separate parts of China from the mainland. As for Iran, didn't you imply earlier that Iran is a U.S ally? If that's the case then why is the U.S slapping sanctions on Iran while walking out on the Iran Nuclear Deal? You said: "Also, they were horrible allies to Russia." China and the Soviet Union had a falling out over differences in communist ideology during the Sino-Soviet Conflict, and the U.S was quick to capitalize on the divide to keep our countries suspicious of each other. However, fast forward till today, and the U.S actions towards Russia and China are literally driving both our countries closer together than we've ever been, until there is practically no daylight between us. You said: "They were hostile to Vietnam, who should have been an ally." Vietnam should have been an ally after what China did for them during their fight for independence. During the First Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons, ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla force with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help Vietnam fight for independence. From 1950 to 1954 the Chinese government shipped goods, materials, and medicine worth $46 billion (in 2021 dollars) to Vietnam. From 1950 to 1956 the Chinese government shipped 155,000 small arms, 58 million rounds of ammunition, 4,630 artillery pieces, 1,080,000 artillery shells, 840,000 hand grenades, 1,400,000 uniforms, 1,200 vehicles, 14,000 tons of food, and 26,000 tons of fuel to Vietnam. ... Source: Wikipedia: First Indochina War Yet some Vietnamese nationalists (but not all) conveniently forget Chinese aid given to them during their fight for independence from the French, and some even claimed that they did it all by themselves. You said: "Instead the Chinese sought to conquer Vietnam for themselves." China never said that. The Sino-Vietnam War was because the Vietnamese invaded Cambodia (Kampuchea) and ousted its government and just sat there without installing a new government. As Cambodia's ally, China cannot allow the Vietnam to invade other sovereign countries with impunity so the Sino-Vietnam war was a punitive war meant to punish Vietnam, not conquer it. Vietnamese forces were unable to stop the People's Liberation Army's advance to its capital, Hanoi. On 6 March, China declared that the gate to Hanoi was open and that their punitive mission had been achieved and withdrew afterwards. China did not seek to conquer Vietnam for ourselves, despite clearing a path to Hanoi. You said: "Taiwan could have been a major asset to China, now it will never trust the CCP and the US won't allow a forceful takeover." Taiwan is becoming an asset to the U.S, but the U.S only seeks to make use of the island to contain the mainland's rise. The U.S has a long history of making use of assets and then discarding them once they no longer serve any purpose. Mainland China does not see Taiwan as an asset, it's an inalienable part of China, and mainlanders consider the people of Taiwan as our brothers and sisters. In fact, I would say that the country that cares the most about Taiwan is China itself. The U.S is not aiming for peaceful reunification, they are continually sending officials to visit the island and inflaming the situation further. You said: "I can go further into how the CCP messed up, but you likely lack the knowledge to stay with me." I do not claim to be knowledgeable in everything, but from what I read of your words thus far, all you seem to do is s**t on China's accomplishments under the CPC, then aren't you exhibiting precisely the kind of behavior that I encountered whenever I bring up China's achievements to Americans?
    1
  22867.  @distinctga5811  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Also, Asians are looked upon very positively in the US because their culture promotes respect and hard work." That's not the case. Some Americans (not all) are resentful towards Chinese for "stealing their jobs" even though the jobs are going to the countries willing to work the most for the least wage. There was even a point in U.S history where Chinese were banned from migrating to the U.S in what's known as the Chinese Exclusion Act, because Chinese workers were perceived as too competitive, as railroad construction workers, laborers (coolies), rickshaw drivers, restaurant owners, laundromat workers, and other blue collar jobs. You said: "A large portion of the crimes against Asians were done by African Americans," African Americans are still Americans are they not? Then it should be Americans (those who are responsible) that bear the blame for the crimes against Asians. You said: "Asians success in this country undermines the validity of blaming racism on everything." You yourself just singled out African Americans and basically threw them under the bus, yet you're saying blaming racism is not valid?
    1
  22868.  @distinctga5811  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Actually the KMT was absolutely demolished by the Japanese" Let's look at the strength of the two sides after the Japanese surrendered in 1945 at the end of WWII. The KMT had a strength of: -2 million (regular) -2.3 million (militia) (June 1946) Whereas the communists had a strength of -1.2 million (regular) -2.6 million (militia) (July 1945) ... Source: Wikipedia: Chinese Civil War So what do you mean by the KMT being "absolutely demolished by the Japanese"? The KMT forces still enjoyed numerical superiority over the communists even after the Japanese surrendered, and yet they still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. You said: "The Russians armed the Communist revolution with many modern weapons" The KMT also received over $750,000,000 in U.S aid, but had pocketed it instead of putting it to good use. It had gotten so bad that even U.S President Harry Truman make a note about it and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves". You said: "The KMT didn't have the advantage. They were in a precarious situation from day one." The KMT held all the advantage initially but over the course of the war, lost it due to sheer incompetence, and had to flee the mainland to Taiwan island. If anything, doesn't this demonstrate the KMT is not fit to govern the mainland, while at the same time cementing the communists right to rule China?
    1
  22869.  @distinctga5811  You said: "Nonetheless, they seemed to have done much better than the CCP, given that their people have democratized and are far more prosperous than the mainlanders." Taiwan's prosperity was achieved under authoritarian single-party KMT rule. For more than half its life, the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: Wikipedia: White Terror (Taiwan) But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Source: Wikipedia: Taiwan Miracle Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China. Given that Taiwan's economic prosperity was achieved under authoritarian single party rule, and that its people are now suffering economically under democracy, how is it more successful than the mainland?
    1
  22870.  @distinctga5811  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwanese are far more successful than the mainlanders on average." Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: MBA Skool: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  22871.  @115islandscompass6  The Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands were part of China until the Japanese occupied them during the war. Chinese records of these islands date back to as early as the 15th century when they were referred as Diaoyu in books such as Voyage with a Tail Wind (Chinese: 順風相送; pinyin: Shùnfēng Xiāngsòng) (1403) and Record of the Imperial Envoy's Visit to Ryūkyū (Chinese: 使琉球錄; pinyin: Shǐ Liúqiú Lù) (1534). Adopted by the Chinese Imperial Map of the Ming Dynasty, the Chinese name for the island group (Diaoyu) and the Japanese name for the main island (Uotsuri) both mean "fishing". After the Japanese surrendered at the end of WWII, they agreed to relinquish all previously occupied territory, yet the Diaoyu Islands weren't returned back to China. You said: "This is certainly not a war, but it cannot be called a peaceful act." So it's certainly not an act of war, then my point still stands that China is currently at peace and not at war with any country. Like I said earlier, fishing disputes arise all the time, just look at France and Britain having a fishing dispute, but it doesn't translate to being at war. You said: "Then, do you call the act of firing missiles into Japanese territorial waters “peaceful”?" The U.S tested its Minutemen III ICBM which flew over international waters and traveled approximately 4,200 miles to the Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands. You said: "BTW, we often hear in the news in China that the ground is collapsing, trains are falling from overpasses, flooding is happening here and there, and drought is drying up rivers. The reason why they happen so often is because China's infrastructure is not properly maintained." This just shows how Western media paint a negative image of China to their audiences. China has arguably the best infrastructure construction in the world, we are home to many of the world's tallest, longest and highest bridges. Wikipedia: List of Longest Bridges: -Danyang–Kunshan Grand Bridge (164,800 m) -Tianjin Grand Bridge (113,700 m) -Cangde Grand Bridge (105,881 m) -Weinan Weihe Grand Bridge (79,732 m) -Beijing Grand Bridge (48,153 m) ... Wikipedia: List of Tallest Bridges: -Pingtang Bridge (332 m) -Hutong Yangtze River Bridge (325 m) -Sutong Bridge (306 m) -Chishi Bridge (288 m) -Xiang River Bridge (288 m) -Qingshan Yangtze River Bridge (283 m) ... Wikipedia: List of Highest Bridges -Duge Bridge (565 m) -Sidu River Bridge (496 m) -Pull Bridge (485 m) -Jin'an Bridge (461 m) -Yachi River Bridge (434 m) -Qinshui Bridge (406 m) You said: "Despite that, why would China want to expand?" China is not expanding, we are retaking territory that was lost as a result of the Century of Humiliation, where Eight Nations invaded China and carved up our territory like a pie (like in that infamous French Cartoon) in to many pieces for themselves. China has accepted that some pieces are no longer retrievable (i.e Vladivostok), but China has managed to get countries to cough up pieces like Hong Kong and Macau to return back to mainland. The last remaining unclaimed piece is Taiwan island, and mainland China will spare no expense to reunify Taiwan with the mainland. This is not considered "expansion" into other countries territories, is it not? After all, it was China that "baked the pie" that was carved up by foreign powers and divided among themselves, China is merely retaking as many of our rightful pieces as possible.
    1
  22872.  @distinctga5811  You said: "If the CCP was so great why did they fail constantly until the moment the US adopted globalization in the year 2000?" What makes you claim China failed constantly? First point is that the Chairman Mao Zedong managed to reunify our divided country and proclaimed the founding of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949, whereas the previous KMT administration failed to achieve during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 period (1912-1949) for 37 years. Secondly, under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Under Mao, China's life expectancy at birth nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980, and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al. 1984; Coale1984; Jamison 1984; Banister 1987; Ravallion 1997; Banister and Hill 2004). Under Mao, China's Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old) fell from 195 deaths per 1k births in 1950, to 55 deaths per 1k births in 1980. Thirdly, China's literacy rates under Mao have been hailed as "The Single Greatest Educational Effort in Human History" by some Western scholars. The illiteracy rate of China stood at roughly 85-90% when it was first calculated at the turn of the 20th century, and began to decrease significantly from the 1950s onward. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%, and they have been steadily decreasing since.
    1
  22873.  @distinctga5811  You said: "Next you talk about "high tech exports" AKA China assembles final products, such as iphones, and they get credit for exporting the product despite importing the high tech components." Because you were talking about high tech exports, and China is the world's largest exporter of high tech products then why can't China get the credit? Are you so petty that you'll refuse to give China credit where credit is due? If you don't like China's assembled final products, you're always welcome to keep the unassembled pieces yourself. You said: "$9 of the iphone profit of $238 goes to China, "the other $228.99 goes elsewhere. The U.S. and Japan each take a roughly $68 cut, Taiwan gets about $48, and a little under $17 goes to South Korea." So are you saying that if China were to be cut off from Western high tech imports, mainland China would suffer less losses than U.S, Japan, Taiwan island and South Korea? Then you're just demonstrating that they would suffer more losses if they decoupled from China, thanks for proving my point. You said: "First of all, many products in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan have to travel to the US anyways, so why not assemble them next door for a fraction of the cost." So it looks like you're against decoupling then, because it will hurt the U.S more than it does China. Thanks for reinforcing my point. You said: "Also, China essentially has a monopoly on Rare Earth metals so the deal was that the West can have access to these metals only if they assemble the finished products in China." Well said. China's rare Earth Metals production makes up around 80-90% of the entire worlds production and rare earth metals are essential for technology such as rechargeable batteries for electric and hybrid cars, advanced ceramics, computers, DVD players, wind turbines, solar panels, rocket circuitry, catalysts in cars and oil refineries, monitors, televisions, phone screens, lighting, lasers, fiber optics, LEDs, superconductors and glass polishing Much of our modern technology probably won't function if not for China's rare earth metals, so if U.S were to decouple from China, they will take a harder hit than China, that's for sure.
    1
  22874.  @distinctga5811  "神州 Shenzhou Do you know who makes the cutting edge semiconductors that you find in your computers?" China is the world's largest exporter of semiconductors. In 2020, the top exporters of Semiconductor Devices were Mainland China ($35.8B), Japan ($9.57B), Malaysia ($8.67B), Germany ($6.27B), and Chinese Taipei ($5.48B). China leads the production of semiconductor chips in the world, according to data from the United Nations. ... Source: Semiconductor Devices OEC.
    1
  22875.  @115islandscompass6  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Huh? Is it taught that "Japan took it in World War II"? smh" Did I ever said that the Diaoyu Islands were taken by Japan during World War II? You said: "The first time the Senkaku Islands appear in Western historical records is in British records around 1845." The first published description of the islands in Europe appears in a book imported by Isaac Titsingh in 1796. His small library of Japanese books included Sangoku Tsūran Zusetsu (三國通覧圖說, An Illustrated Description of Three Countries) by Hayashi Shihei. This text, which was published in Japan in 1785, described the Ryūkyū Kingdom. Hayashi followed convention in giving the islands their Chinese names in his map in the text, where he coloured them in the same pink as China. You said: "In the letter, it is written that fishermen drifted to Wayo Island in the Senkaku Islands, Yaeyama County, Okinawa Prefecture, Empire of Japan(大日本帝国沖縄県八重山郡尖閣列島内和洋島). From this, we know that the Republic of China recognized the Senkaku Islands as Japanese territory." China acknowledge that Japan took control of the islands in 1894–1895 during the first Sino-Japanese War, through the signature of the Treaty of Shimonoseki. China assert that the Potsdam Declaration required that Japan relinquish control of all islands except for "the islands of Honshū, Hokkaidō, Kyūshū, Shikoku and such minor islands as we determine", and China state that this means control of the islands should pass to Republic of China, which was part of China at the time of the first Sino-Japanese War as well as of the San Francisco Peace Treaty.. You said: "The Treaty of San Francisco does not require the return of territories recognized as ancient Japanese territories." The Potsdam Declaration stated that that the "Japanese sovereignty shall be limited to the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku, and such minor islands as we determine," so shouldn't the Diaoyu Islands be returned back to China?
    1
  22876.  @distinctga5811  You're the one who boasted that "神州 Shenzhou Taiwanese are far more successful than than the mainlanders on average." but you only named one Taiwan company? Besides smartphones, Chinese companies also dominate the civilian drone industry and Chinese company DJI is world's largest civilian drone-maker according to the following source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  22877.  @distinctga5811  You said: "Again, China imports the computational aspects of these devices, which is the fundamental aspect of any smart phone or computer." Again, we've shown that China exports more high-tech products than any other in the world, so if the Western high-tech imports to China are cut, then it's clearly the West who will suffer if they decouple from China. How else to further elaborate on this simple point? You said: "You clearly don't understand, but it is what it is." How else to explain? Look even you admitted that China essentially has a monopoly on rare earth metals, at around 80-90% of the world's total rare earth metal production, which are used for technology such as rechargeable batteries for electric and hybrid cars, advanced ceramics, computers, DVD players, wind turbines, solar panels, rocket circuitry, catalysts in cars and oil refineries, monitors, televisions, phone screens, lighting, lasers, fiber optics, LEDs, superconductors and glass polishing. If China ceased our production of rare earth metals, then all the high-technology industry in the world will come to a screeching halt, even in the West. How else to explain the fact that the West will only hurt itself more if they choose to decouple with China. You said: "Honestly, I don't really care to have a conversation with someone that is clearly dishonest, delusional or incompetent." Same here, I've illustrated my point using data and statistics, that the West will only hurt themselves is they decouple from China, yet the person I'm talking to just feign ignorance.
    1
  22878.  @distinctga5811  You said: " In China HIGH PERFORMANCE SEMICONDUCTORS are imported. Then you would say, "while China produces many (low performance) semiconductors (using Western imported manufacturing equipment)" But it's the low-performance semiconductors that are widely used in much of the world's devices, appliances, gadgets, etc, not so much the high-performance chips who have very specific uses. Also, China's chip making industry is showing signs of flourishing, even in the face of Western sanctions. Chinese orders for chip-manufacturing equipment from overseas suppliers rose 58% in 2021, making it the biggest market for those products for a second year running. You said: "Every step you take just makes you look foolish." We've been talking for quite a bit and it's become apparent that you're just anti-China that's all. Every time I bring up China's accomplishments under the CPC, all you done is s**t all over China's success, mocking our capabilities (even Chinese mainlanders) then why create this facade that you're not anti-China when you clearly are? I've countered your points using statistics, but all you done is insult Chinese capabilities that's all.
    1
  22879.  @distinctga5811  You said: "Lol. Again. Taiwan is a small nation, so they don't have the the Capacity that China has, but they do have superior Capability especially when considered per capita." Take supercomputers for example and China is home to two of Top 10 World's Fastest Supercomputers, the Sunway TaihuLight (神威·太湖之光) and Tianhe-2 (天河-2). In the list of TOP500 supercomputers, China ranks top in the world with 173 of such systems. Top 500 supercomputers by country (as of November 2021) 1. China (173 systems) 2. United States (149 systems) 3. Japan (32 systems) 4. Germany (26 systems) 5. France (19 systems) 6. Canada (11 systems) 7. United Kingdom (11 systems) 8. South Korea (7 systems) 9. Russia (7 systems) 10. Italy (6 systems) ... Source: TOP500 But where are the famous supercomputers from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland? Yet you boasted that Taiwanese are far more successful than than the mainlanders on average? You said: _"Then you talk about "How can Taiwan compete with the mainland" Why don't you all try and invade Taiwan to find out?" Taiwan is part of China (according to its constitution) so how can China invade ourselves? The island is clearly unable to compete with the mainland both economically as well as militarily, yet are you so callous towards the people of Taiwan that you would subject them to war just because you can't refute my point? You said: "The truth is that your leaders are scared." Scared of what? It's no secret today the the U.S is in decline and China is rising. As long as peace prevails, the U.S will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge the mainland rises anymore, and by that time, support for Taiwan's independence would evaporate and reunification would be inevitable. It's the Western leaders whom are scared, that's why they are trying to inflame tension along the Taiwan strait here. You said: "If you want to talk about economic power, the USA dominates China." Many economists predict that China's economy will surpass the United State's economy someday in the foreseeable future. You said: "Consider the Iphone production in China: China clocked $500 GDP per Iphone in 2016 but really only profits $9 while the US earns $90 and only clocks about 90$." You've said this point before, and all you're proving is that US would suffer 10x more than China ($90 vs $9) if the U.S decouples from China that's all.
    1
  22880.  @distinctga5811  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Population increase, especially at those levels, isn't something to be proud of." Why shouldn't China be proud of our population? Statistically speaking, as the world's largest population, China has the most brainpower the come up with plans as well as the most manpower to implement said plans into action. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of the U.S, China has around 4 geniuses for every 1 American genius. Consider two bell curves, one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million for the populations of China and the USA. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S and this is also true for the top 2%. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal. ... Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large Populations Have More Geniuses You said: "神州 Shenzhou Lol. The US actually has the most abundant sources of Rare Earth Metals," But those are unprocessed, and again, it's China that essentially has a monopoly (by your own admission) on rare earth metals production, so in order to convert those rare earth metals into finished products, they'll have be sent to China to be processed. Therefore, U.S decoupling from China would hurt itself more than it would China. You said: "70% of US GDP is consumed domestically compared to 40% of Chinese GDP," That's bound to change as China's income levels rise. Already, China has the largest middle-class consumption market segment in the world with over 900 million people. Together, they are spending over $22 billion per day, and if China can convert all 1.4 billion people in China into consumers, then we would be the world's largest consumer market (if we aren't already. You said: "China is far more reliant on exports than the US." Well, the U.S is far more reliant on imports than China. The U.S is the largest goods importer in the world and China was the top supplier of goods to the United States. So the U.S is more likely to be hurt by decoupling than China, who can always export our goods elsewhere.
    1
  22881.  @distinctga5811  You said: "The US can find cheap labor elsewhere, however it would have to shift the workforce around. Vietnam, Indonesia and India are all viable regions to relocate assembly lines," Are those Vietnamese, Indonesian and India workers willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers? If not, then goods from those regions will be pricier compares to Made-in-China goods. Also, they will be starting from scratch, so they'll most likely make poor quality products since they lack the manufacturing experience that Chinese workers have. Also, do Vietnam, Indonesia and India have the infrastructure to compete with China's? How are these countries going to ship all those Made-in-Vietnam, Indonesia, India goods across the Pacific Ocean to the U.S? China is home to many of the world's busiest ports. List of busiest container ports in 2020 1. Shanghai (China): 43,500 TEUs 2. Singapore (Singapore): 36,600 TEUs 3. Ningbo-Zhoushan (China): 28,720 TEUs 4. Shenzhen (China): 26,550 TEUs 5. Guangzhou (China): 23,190 TEUs 6. Qingdao (China): 22,000 TEUs 7. Busan (South Korea): 21,590 TEUs 8. Hong Kong (China): 20,070 TEUs 9. Tianjin (China): 18,350 TEUs 10. Los Angeles (United States):17,310 TEUs ... Source: Wikipedia: List of busiest container ports List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage in 2019 1. Ningbo-Zhousan (China): 1,120,090 kilo-tonnes 2. Shanghai (China): 716,770 kilo-tonnes 3. Tangshan (China): 656,740 kilo-tonnes 4. Singapore (Singapore): 626,180 kilo-tonnes 5. Guangzhou (China): 606,160 kilo-tonnes 6. Qingdao (China): 577,360 kilo-tonnes 7. Suzhou (China): 522,750 kilo-tonnes 8. Port Hedland (Australia): 521,880 kilo-tonnes 9. Tiangjin (China): 492,200 kilo-tonnes 10. Rotterdam (Netherlands): 469,400 kilo-tonnes ... Source: Wikipedia: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage So are Vietnam, Indonesia and India able to match China's ability to ship out finished goods across the Pacific Ocean to the USA? If not, then the U.S will suffer a massive reduction in goods if they decouple from China. You said: "most of these jobs are on the brink of being automated" China is already the world's largest market for automation. For example, China is home to Asia's first automated container terminal at the Port of Qingdao. The automated port set a record for the most efficient loading/unloading of goods, and the machines can work 24 hours, even at night in complete darkness.
    1
  22882.  @distinctga5811  You said: "The US can find an alternative to cheap labor, while China cannot find an alternative to Western technological imports." China is having a chip breakthrough. Chinese company SMIC had successfully produced 7nm chips for semiconductors, despite U.S sanctions and possibly advancing its production technology by two generations. SMIC took two years to achieve the leap from 14-nm to 7-nm, faster than TSMC and Samsung according to a Canada-based research firm, TechInsights. You said: "The US can rebalance it's labor force to replace China, but China cannot do the same in respect to US technology." I've already highlighted the difficulties of USA relocating manufacturing to Vietnam, Indonesia and India, given that they'll eventually have to ship their finished products across the Pacific Ocean, and they cannot match China's port infrastructure. I've also highlighted some Chinese chip breakthrough in the production of 7nm chips for use in semiconductors. You said: "The US, Britain, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand will likely march in sync on the matter." China is the biggest trading partner of Britain, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand, why would they want to break their trade with China just because the U.S does? Are they U.S allies or are they vassals instead? You said: "The EU will probably as well considering the actions that Russia has taken towards Ukraine." I don't understand your logic, what has Russia's actions in Ukraine even got to do with EU trading with its biggest trading partner, China? China is not Russia, neither is Russia China, so why do you base your relationship with one country on the actions of another? Also, Ukraine is not even a member of NATO or the EU, so what has Russia's actions in Ukraine got to do with the EU? You said: "China hasn't built the relationships that the USA has, nor does it have the moral high ground." China is clearly the biggest trading partner of Britain, EU, Japan, South Korea, etc, and they would be jeopardizing their economic relations with China if they just blindly follow the U.S. As for moral high ground, the U.S promised to supply LNG to EU if they impose sanctions on Russian gas, and yet the U.S is limiting their LNG exports at the time when the EU urgently needs LNG. In fact, in the most recent news, it's China that sold LNG to the EU at a hefty profit, so what high moral ground are you talking about, when the U.S doesn't live up to its commitments to its allies?
    1
  22883.  @distinctga5811  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Check the specs on those semiconductors, also see who develops the machines needed to build them." There's been a chip breakthrough in China. Chinese company SMIC has demonstrated the ability to produce 7nm chips for semiconductors, in defiance of U.S sanctions and possibly allowing China to leap ahead by two generations. Researchers at a Canadian tech analysis firm (TechInsights) concluded that Shanghai-based SMIC has been able to produce 7-nanometre chips since last year. Experts said it is technically possible for SMIC to produce 7-nm chips even without the most advanced production equipment. SMIC took two years to achieve the leap from 14-nm to 7-nm, faster than TSMC and Samsung and SMIC’s advanced capability would put the company ahead of American and European peers.
    1
  22884.  @115islandscompass6  You said: "The Senkaku Islands are included in the “such minor islands as we determine”." Who gave the Western countries the right to determine the sovereignty of previously Japanese-occupied islands after their liberation? China was not invited to the Treaty of San Francisco, and we didn't have a say in whether Japan should be allowed to keep the Diaoyu Islands.
    1
  22885.  @115islandscompass6  The U.S was given administration of what wasn't U.S territory and was previously Chinese territory that's been occupied by Japan. China was not a party to the Treaty of San Francisco and China objected to it. The "Agreement between Japan and the United States Concerning the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito Islands (Okinawa Reversion Agreement)" did not consider China's input over the situation. You said: "From this, it is clear that China did not consider the Senkaku Islands to be part of Taiwan/China until 1970." Not true. It's because the world didn't recognize PRC as China until 1971 when the UN Resolution 2758 was passed recognizing PRC as China and kicking Taiwan out of the UN Security Council. U.S President Nixon visited China in 1972, and that's when China's voice could be finally be heard by the rest of the world, objecting to the Treaty of San Francisco. But it doesn't mean that China did not consider Diaoyu Islands as part of China until 1970. (Remember, China (both ROC and PRC) weren't invited to the signing of Treaty of San Francisco, so how is China to to know that this signing had taken place?)
    1
  22886.  @distinctga5811  Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Programme for International Student Assessment in all three fields: Science, Mathematics and Reading. 2018 PISA ranking (Mathematics) 1. Mainland China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) 6. Japan (527) 7. South Korea (526) 8. Estonia (523) 9. Netherlands (519) 10. Poland (516) ... 2018 PISA ranking (Science) 1. Mainland China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) 6. Japan (529) 7. Finland (522) 8. South Korea (519) 9. Canada (518) 10. Hong Kong, China (517) ... 2018 PISA ranking (Reading) 1. Mainland China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau (525) 4. Hong Kong (524) 5. Estonia (523) 6. Canada (520) 6. Finland (520) 8. Ireland (518) 9. South Korea (514) 10. Poland (512) ... Source: PISA
    1
  22887.  @distinctga5811  You said: "The United States can process it's own rare earths." U.S rare earth metal processing technology has been exported to China, so it would be a monumental task to restart rare earth metal processing in the U.S. Furthermore like you said China can do it cheaper, so rare earths processed in the U.S is going to cost more than in China. You said: "It's a matter of depleting China's resources to put the US in an even greater position of dominance after the decoupling." How long will it take China to deplete our rare earth metal resources? China has 44 million metric tonnes (MT) of rare earth reserves compared to U.S's 1.8 million MT. You said: "The US is the world reserve currency. Of course they have a lot of imports." The Dollars status as the reserve currency is predicted to decline if the U.S continue printing dollars with impunity. If the Chinese Renminbi (or Russian Ruble) or other currencies can potentially displace the U.S Dollar, then U.S won't even be able to continue printing money to fuel their debt.
    1
  22888.  @distinctga5811  "神州 Shenzhou So I guess this is the real question that sums everything up: Why is the United States decoupling from China and not the other way around?" Because American leaders are desperate to contain China's inevitable rise, so much such that they are willing to shoot themselves in the foot. Americans leaders have to find some scapegoat to blame for America's domestic woes, so they look towards China in order to paint China as somehow being the source of U.S problems. That's why people like you take a clearly negative view of our country. You said: "We don't need to have this conversation anymore. The proof is in the pudding." I have outlined the challenges that the U.S faces in moving manufacturing to places like Vietnam, Indonesia and India. How will these countries ship their Made-in-Vietnam/Indonesia/India goods across the Pacific Ocean to the U.S in competitive volume to match China's port facilities? It's apparent by now that whenever I bring up China's accomplishments, all you seem to do is throw mud on them or dismiss them entirely, then it's clear that you're just anti-China that's all. Throughout our long conversation, you've been against Chinese mainlanders, Chinese government, Chinese businesses, Chinese population, then why pretend that you're not anti-China when you clearly are? You said: "Both countries face hardships from decoupling, but it is detrimental to China whereas it is only a headwind to the US." China can always find other buyers of Chinese goods, but the U.S is unable to manufacture their own goods that can even compete with China. Neither can other countries like Vietnam, India, Indonesia match China's port infrastructure. You said: "Let us wait and see. If China is what you say it is, then it will have no problem surpassing the US on the world stage and taking Taiwan." Is the idea of a non-Western country like China surpassing the U.S someday in the foreseeable future so anathema to you?
    1
  22889.  @distinctga5811  China has even sent people into space. In October 2003, Taikonaut (Chinese astronaut) Yang Liwei (杨利伟) became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, onboard the Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. This makes China the third country to independently send humans into space apart from the U.S and the USSR. Video: YouTube: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space But why hasn't Japan sent people to space by itself? Why hasn't Taiwan island sent people into space by itself? Yet you're boasting that Japan and Taiwan are more successful than mainland China?
    1
  22890.  @distinctga5811  You said: "We don't need to have this conversation anymore. The proof is in the pudding." I have outlined the challenges that the U.S faces in moving manufacturing to places like Vietnam, Indonesia and India. How will these countries ship their Made-in-Vietnam/Indonesia/India goods across the Pacific Ocean to the U.S in competitive volume to match China's port facilities? It's apparent by now that whenever I bring up China's accomplishments, all you seem to do is throw mud on them or dismiss them entirely, then it's clear that you're just anti-China that's all. Throughout our long conversation, you've been against Chinese mainlanders, Chinese government, Chinese businesses, Chinese population, then why pretend that you're not anti-China when you clearly are? You said: "Both countries face hardships from decoupling, but it is detrimental to China whereas it is only a headwind to the US." China can always find other buyers of Chinese goods, but the U.S is unable to manufacture their own goods that can even compete with China. Neither can other countries like Vietnam, India, Indonesia match China's port infrastructure. You said: "Let us wait and see. If China is what you say it is, then it will have no problem surpassing the US on the world stage and taking Taiwan." Is the idea of a non-Western country like China surpassing the U.S someday in the foreseeable future so anathema to you?
    1
  22891.  @distinctga5811  The Russian ruble is ranked the world's strongest performing currency this year, so what makes you think the Russians may not someday control the world's reserve currency? And China's economy is predicted to surpass the United State's someday in the foreseeable future, so what makes it think China won't? In terms of Rare Earths Metals, replacing China's rare earths production is going to be expensive for the America, because unlike what you said, the U.S no longer has the know-how. Remember that the U.S outsourced its rare earths production to China, which means that the technology is in China and not in the U.S.
    1
  22892.  @distinctga5811  The Russian ruble is ranked the world's strongest performing currency this year, so what makes you think the Russians may not someday control the world's reserve currency? And China's economy is predicted to surpass the United State's someday in the foreseeable future, so what makes it think China won't? In terms of Rare Earths Metals, replacing China's rare earths production is going to be expensive for the America, because unlike what you said, the U.S no longer has the know-how, the U.S outsourced its rare earths production to China, which means that the technology is in China and not in the U.S.
    1
  22893.  @distinctga5811  The Russian ruble is ranked the world's strongest performing currency this year, and China's economy is predicted to surpass the United State's someday in the foreseeable future, so what makes it think China won't? In terms of Rare Earths Metals, replacing China's rare earths production is going to be expensive for the America, because unlike what you said, the U.S no longer has the know-how. Remember that the U.S outsourced its rare earths production to China, which means that the technology is in China and not in the U.S.
    1
  22894.  @115islandscompass6  You said: "Until 1969, neither the Chinese Communist Party nor the Republic of China claimed sovereignty over the Senkaku Islands." Incorrect. If we look at Wikipedia:File:ROC Administrative and Claims it's a map of the Republic of China (1953-2005), showing administrative divisions and territorial disputes, and the Diaoyu /Senkaku Islands are administered by Japan, and claimed by the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China.
    1
  22895.  @distinctga5811  China has always been under authoritarian rule (and we still are today). China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Egypt and Rome eventually succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous empires, and yet China has survived the oftentimes violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact. Throughout it all, China has been under a strong central government under the rule of the Emperor and the Imperial Court, and today's PRC system under President Xi and the Communist Party closely emulates the ancient system of China's past. Such an authoritarian system has proved successful for China for millennia, and is successful today as well, then can't China continue to pursue this form of political system? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. Previously before the 1997 return, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held in Hong Kong by its people while it was a British colony. It was during the period of Hong Kong's handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people could finally vote in elections for their favorite leader. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two System policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony? If you count the number of elections held in Hong Kong, Hong Kong actually held more elections AFTER it's 1997 return to mainland China, than they ever did before, for 150 years as a British colony.
    1
  22896.  @distinctga5811  You said: "Then a series of events soured the relationship and is derailing China's rise." Many believe it was Trump's tarriffs on China that was what soured the relationship, but it's possible it might be Obama's "Pivot to Asia" and even earlier cause U.S-China relations to deteriorate to the low point that it is today. How was the 1 Country, 2 Systems agreement violated? As far as I know, Hong Kong has their separate government, separate currency, passport, judicial system, even their own separate flag 🇭🇰, yet they are considered part of China under this system. It's unheard of for Western democracies to allow multiple systems existing within their borders, yet despite China being authoritarian, China has permitted Hong Kong to keep their separate system while being part of China. Also, you seem to have conveniently forgotten the U.S House of Speaker representative visit to the island that has inflamed tension in the Taiwan Strait. President Xi had phoned President Biden about the consequences of her trip, but the U.S went ahead with the visit, now you're claiming Beijing is heightening aggression in the Taiwan Strait? If the U.S was truly committed to peaceful reunification of the Taiwan strait, then why is the U.S continually sending officials to visit the island and heightening tensions further? Such continued visits appear to signal a U.S change to their subscription to the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China, so why would they do that if they were purportedly committed to peaceful reunification? Crimea had that 2014 referendum in which the overwhelming majority (96.77%) voted to join the Russian Federation.
    1
  22897.  @distinctga5811  You said: "Then a series of events soured the relationship and is derailing China's rise." Many believe it was Trump's tarriffs on China that was what soured the relationship, but it's possible it might be Obama's "Pivot to Asia" and even earlier cause U.S-China relations to deteriorate to the low point that it is today. How was the 1 Country, 2 Systems agreement violated? As far as I know, Hong Kong has their separate government, separate currency, passport, judicial system, even their own separate flag 🇭🇰, yet they are considered part of China under this system. It's unheard of for Western democracies to allow multiple systems existing within their borders, yet despite China being authoritarian, China has permitted Hong Kong to keep their separate system while being part of China. If the U.S was truly committed to peaceful reunification of the Taiwan strait, then why is the U.S continually sending officials to visit the island and heightening tensions further? Such continued visits appear to signal a U.S change to their subscription to the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China, so why would they do that if they were purportedly committed to peaceful reunification? Crimea had that 2014 referendum in which the overwhelming majority (96.77%) voted to join the Russian Federation.
    1
  22898.  @distinctga5811  You said: "Then a series of events soured the relationship and is derailing China's rise." Many believe it was Trump's tarriffs on China that was what soured the relationship, but it's possible it might be Obama's "Pivot to Asia" and even earlier cause U.S-China relations to deteriorate to the low point that it is today. How was the 1 Country, 2 Systems agreement violated? As far as I know, Hong Kong has their separate government, separate currency, passport, judicial system, even their own separate flag 🇭🇰, yet they are considered part of China under this system. It's practically unheard of for Western democracies to allow multiple systems existing within their borders, yet despite China being authoritarian, China has permitted Hong Kong to keep their separate system while being part of China. Also, you seem to have conveniently forgotten the U.S House of Speaker trip to the island that has inflamed tension in the Taiwan Strait. President Xi had phoned President Biden about the consequences of her trip, but the U.S went ahead with the visit, now you're claiming Beijing is heightening aggression in the Taiwan Strait? If the U.S was truly committed to peaceful reunification of the Taiwan strait, then why is the U.S continually sending officials to visit the island and heightening tensions further? Crimea had that 2014 referendum in which the overwhelming majority (96.77%) voted to join the Russian Federation.
    1
  22899.  @distinctga5811  How was the 1 Country, 2 Systems agreement violated? As far as I know, Hong Kong has their separate government, separate currency, passport, judicial system, even their own separate flag 🇭🇰, yet they are considered part of China under this system. It's unheard of for Western democracies to allow multiple systems existing within their borders, yet despite China being authoritarian, China has permitted Hong Kong to keep their separate system while being part of China. Also, you seem to have conveniently forgotten the U.S House of Speaker representative visit to the island that has inflamed tension in the Taiwan Strait. President Xi had phoned President Biden about the consequences of her trip, but the U.S went ahead with the visit, now you're claiming Beijing is heightening aggression in the Taiwan Strait? If the U.S was truly committed to peaceful reunification of the Taiwan strait, then why is the U.S continually sending officials to visit the island and heightening tensions further? Such continued visits appear to signal a U.S change to their subscription to the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China, so why would they do that if they were purportedly committed to peaceful reunification? Crimea had that 2014 referendum in which the overwhelming majority (96.77%) voted to join the Russian Federation.
    1
  22900.  @distinctga5811  You said: "The world is splitting due to what seems to be a series of domino effects." We are experiencing the transition towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, from the current uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (that of the U.S and its allies). It is absurd that the West, who makes up only 15% of the world's population should be permitted to continually dictate terms to the remaining 85% of the world's population and that's why more voices (such as China's and Russia's) are being heard.
    1
  22901.  @distinctga5811  I've been nothing but serious in my remarks to you, yet you seem to respond by hurling insults against me for my views. The U.S outsourced it's Rare Earth Metals production to China, so all that technology, the know-how, the workers, the machinery, have gone to China and elsewhere, and restarting U.S rare earth production is not going to be as easy as you claim. The U.S having built these things before outsourcing, doesn't mean that they can build that same capability again. Where are the U.S rare earth metals expertise? In China. Where are the U.S rare earth machinery? In China. Where are the U.S rare earth workers? Either in China or they have been fired or moved on to other jobs. If the U.S wants to restart their rare earth industry, it's going to a be a momentous task, just gathering the people, the designs, the machinery, and so on. The difference with rare earth production and F-35 production is that Americans have stopped refining rare earths to the point where they've mostly forgotten everything about the refining process. With the F-35 production, I agree that even if the U.S give away all their F-35s, they would still retain the knowledge how to manufacture one. But if say 50 years has passed, after the U.S give away all their F-35s, all the factory workers have been fired or move into other jobs. The manufacturing machinery has been outsources or dismantled for parts, and nobody remained to impart F-35 knowledge to the next generation of Americans, then the U.S would have lost that technology. The same applies for rare earth production, the U.S has gone for so long without rare earth production that it would be a huge task just to restart it. Recently in a U.S article, it was plainly stated that: The United States has only one rare earths mine and has no capability to process rare earth minerals.
    1
  22902.  @distinctga5811  The Russian Ruble (not "Rubble" as you called it) is ranked the world's top-performing currency this year. Before the special military operation, the Ruble was trading at around 70 ruble per U.S Dollar. After the flurry of sanctions by the West, the ruble weakened to 130 ruble per USD, but today the ruble has since stablized an is trading at aroung 60 ruble per USA (even better than pre-war). So it appears that the Western attempts to destablise the Russian currency have backfired. Russia is also not geopolitically isolated like you claim. According to analysis by the Economist's Intelligence Unit, fully two-thirds of the world’s population live in countries where the government has declined to condemn Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, either by adopting a position of neutrality or actually opposing expressions of condemnation. Nearly one-third of the world’s population lives in a country where their government’s position is “neutral” according to the Economist classification. Just look at Russian Foreign Ministry spokeperson Larov when he visited Africa and he was warmly received by many in the region, as compared to U.S Biden's visit to Africa. As for China's currency, the BRIC countries' GDP is responsible for 43% of world's GDP, while Europe and the United States together represent 36%. The emerging countries were also responsible for 70% of the growth of the world's GDP (Arbix and Salerno, 2008). The growth of BRICS increases the possibility of the Chinese Renminbi being accepted as a potential reserve currency. Additionally, countries like Iran and Argentina had officially applied to join BRICS, while Saudi Arabia, Turkiye and Egypt have similar plans to join BRICS.
    1
  22903.  @115islandscompass6  I already gave you evidence and you've looked at the map. On the other hand, you've offered nothing to support you claim that ROC and PRC did make territorial claims to the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands.
    1
  22904.  @distinctga5811  Russia has announce that their gas supplier to Europe, Gazprom, will only accept Russian Ruble in payment for gas delivered to Europe, so whether they like it or not, EU countries will have to buy Ruble if they want Russian gas. Not only that but Russia is making Western countries pay for Russian wheat and fertilizer in rubles, and this is going to connect the ruble to these basic commodities. The BRIC countries’ gross domestic product (GDP) is responsible for 43% of world’s GDP, while Europe and the United States together represent 36%. The emerging countries were also responsible for 70% of the growth of the world’s GDP (Arbix and Salerno, 2008). Russia's economy is not going from bad to worst. Recently The Sun UK article had a chart comparing the cost of living in Europe compared to sanction-hit Russia. Price of Food: UK up 10.5%, Russia down 11.3% Potatoes: UK up 18%, Russia down 28% Bananas: UK up 12%, Russia down 14% Cabbage: UK up 10%, Russia down 33% Tomatoes: UK up 15%, Russia down 14% Carrots: UK up 16%, Russia down 13% Energy Bills: UK up 80%, Russia up 10% ... Source: The Sun UK: Welcome to sanction-hit Russia, where prices are DOWN as Brits suffer from soaring inflation. Russians are expected to have food in their bellies and warmth this coming winter, while EU countries are seeing more protests over cost of living. I believe in Prague there's like around tens of thousands of people protesting in the Czech Republic? There's also the fact that the U.S seized around $300 billion worth of Russia's foreign reserves might give some countries pause that the U.S can seize their money, and possibly contribute to the need to find an alternative to the dollar.
    1
  22905.  @115islandscompass6  It does, it says from 1953 to 2005. Meanwhile you've given nothing to support your claim that ROC and PRC did make territorial claims to the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands.
    1
  22906.  @souravchakraborty6121  Experts from Chatham House and Lowy Institute have long debunked China's so-called "debt-trap diplomacy" as myth. There is no Chinese debt-trap, the narrative of one wrongfully portrays both Beijing and the developing countries it deals with. Research has shown that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country, much less the port of Hambantota. Laos is growing economically indeed, recently the China-Laos Railway has been opened with much fanfare and has transported over 1 million passengers and 500,000 tonnes of cargo since it was launched in December 2021. As for the Belt and Road Initiative, as of January 2020, 138 countries have signed on to the BRI, ranging from Italy to Saudi Arabia to Cambodia, joining in the mutual prosperity of win-win cooperation. The South China Sea is an important maritime trade route and much of the trade is predominantly with China, so efforts are being taken to maintain peace in the South China Sea. Thus far, there hasn't been any outbreak of war in the SCS region. Donglong is claimed as part of Chinese territory, but the Indian Army just entered the Plateau and stopped People's Liberation Army soldiers from constructing a road in our own territory, even though India does not claim Donglong as part of their territory, yet their troops trespassed onto Chinese territory. As for Galwan Valley, even Indian PM Narendra Modi has said that Chinese troops did not enter Indian territory, neither were there any outposts taken, so is it possible that the intrusion was from the Indian side onto Chinese territory?
    1
  22907.  @souravchakraborty6121  Experts from Chatham House and Lowy Institute have long debunked China's so-called "debt-trap diplomacy" as myth. Research has shown that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country, much less the port of Hambantota. Laos is growing economically indeed, recently the China-Laos Railway has been opened with much fanfare and has transported over 1 million passengers and 500,000 tonnes of cargo since it was launched in December 2021. As for the Belt and Road Initiative, as of January 2020, 138 countries have signed on to the BRI, ranging from Italy to Saudi Arabia to Cambodia, joining in the mutual prosperity of win-win cooperation. The South China Sea is an important maritime trade route and much of the trade is predominantly with China, so efforts are being taken to maintain peace in the South China Sea. Thus far, there hasn't been any outbreak of war in the SCS region. Donglong is claimed as part of Chinese territory, but the Indian Army just entered the Plateau and stopped People's Liberation Army soldiers from constructing a road in our own territory, even though India does not claim Donglong as part of their territory, yet their troops trespassed onto Chinese territory. As for Galwan Valley, even Indian PM Narendra Modi has said that Chinese troops did not enter Indian territory, neither were there any outposts taken, so is it possible that the intrusion was from the Indian side onto Chinese territory?
    1
  22908.  @115islandscompass6  Yes, it means PRC and ROC claimed the territory since 1953. However, ROC may have stopped claiming it in 2005, but it doesn't mean that PRC stopped claiming Diaoyu/Senkaku islands as part of Chinese territory.
    1
  22909. ​ @distinctga5811  By IMF estimates, the BRICS nations will account for over 50% of global GDP by 2030. In 2016, Russia became the largest wheat exporter in the world. China has the world’s largest industrial and manufacturing capacity. How is Europe moving away from Russian gas and oil? The U.S promised to supply EU with liquid natural gas, but recently the U.S LNG exports decreased about 8% last month. Also, the G7 nations imposing a price cap on Russian oil is seemingly going against the principles of free market economies, and as a result, Russia has stated that it would not sell oil to countries that impose a price cap on its oil. Seems like the price cap idea has backfired. Russia's economy has all the basic necessities like affordable food and gas, while the food and gas prices in Europe are rising much to the discontentment of European citizens. What's the point of "high technology imports" when Europeans are expected to go hungry and go cold this coming winter due to rising food and gas prices? Also, didn't you see China's chip breakthrough with Chinese company SMIC demonstrating the ability to fabricate 7 nm wafer chips for use in semiconductors? With this, China has leap ahead by possibly two generations despite the U.S sanctions, and what makes you think China won't possibly offer our chip expertise to Russia?
    1
  22910.  @distinctga5811  You said: "NEWS FLASH: In the West people are allowed to express their discontent publicly unlike in places like China and Russia." It's a common misconception in the West that the people in China cannot express discontent publicly. Take vaccine mandates for example, Beijing had initially announced China's first vaccine mandate, but the idea was scrapped after receiving online backlash by Chinese netizens. Whereas in Canada for example, the "Freedom Convoy" truckers had their bank accounts frozen just for protesting against vaccine mandates. You said: "Find a single source that thinks the Ruble is going to become the worlds reserve currency." Source: Market Insider: Russia and China are brewing up a challenge to dollar dominance by creating a new reserve currency Exerpts: Russia is ready to develop a new global reserve currency alongside China and other BRICS nations, in a potential challenge to the dominance of the US dollar. President Vladimir Putin signaled the new reserve currency would be based on a basket of currencies from the group's members: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. (So if the ruble is included in this basket of currencies, it signifies that the ruble would be a part of this potential new reserve currency.) You said: "Russia can think of their 300 billion USD seized as payment for renting Eastern Ukraine." Ukraine is not even a NATO member nor an EU member, then what has the U.S even got to do with Ukraine? And if the U.S can just seize other countries foreign reserves just like that, then why should countries continue to support the tyranny of the dollar? What if the U.S decides to seize other countries foreign reserves just because they go against the U.S interests? You said: "Lastly, ask yourself why Russia had 300 billion in US banks in the first place? They needed USD." Now they don't, because Russia has been cut off from the SWIFT financial architecture, so that's why Russia is accepting rubles (or renminbi, rupees, etc) as payment for Russian gas, wheat and fertilizer. The U.S seizure of a country's foreign reserves is signalling to U.S allies that perhaps one day in the future, the U.S might just start seizing its allies foreign reserves if they do not obey. You said: "Brazil's economy collapsed when they turned against the US to support Russia after the invasion of Crimea," This speaks to the volume of U.S weaponizing the dollar against countries that do not agree with its stance. In the 2014 Crimea Referendum, the overwhelming majority (96.77%) voted to join the Russian Federation, yet why was Brazil punished by the U.S for support Crimean democracy? It is quite evident which country is determined to preserve their global hegemonic rule. China and Russia are facilitating the transition towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices, from the old uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (that of the U.S and its "allies")
    1
  22911.  @souravchakraborty6121  Every business venture faces risks of some sort, and 20% is quite small in the grand scheme of things. Corruption and lack of transparency is up for the developing countries themselves to sort out, not for China. China is clamping down on corruption on our side, the rest falls on the developing countries themselves. "Out of 122 project only 32 project has been completed so far in Pakistan." Because BRI is a long-term project, spanning 10 years, 20 years, even more, so you cannot expect all 122 projects to be completed on such a short notice. Also, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has resulted in the creation of jobs for 75,000 Pakistanis. Chinese labor makes only 17.5 % of the total number of labor currently working on CPEC while 82.5% labor included Pakistani citizens. Hambantota port is in Sri Lanka, not Pakistan, and like I said earlier, experts from Chatham House and Lowy Institute have long debunked China's so-called "debt-trap diplomacy" as myth. Research has shown that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country, much less the port of Hambantota. According to Forbes, China has forgiven nearly $10 billion in debt to other developing countries. Over the last 18 years, China has written off around $9.8 billion in debt to other countries and Cuba accounts for over half of it. So if China is aiming for the so-called "debt-trap" diplomacy, this is clearly a step in the opposite direction of a debt trap!
    1
  22912.  @souravchakraborty6121  20% is an acceptable level of risk for a business venture the likes of the Belt and Road Initiative. Going up to 40% is just a forecast, but it may not turn out to be the case. Business is about evaluating the risks versus the benefits, and many developing countries still choose to join on board BRI of their own volition. Yes, BRI a long-term project, so you cannot expect to see 100% success in short-term, it takes a while for the projects to develop and most of them should complete by 2030. 25% being completed is entirely on schedule. And what Pakistan zone full of Chinese naval base are you talking about? China only has a handful of overseas bases, and none of them are in Pakistan. Source: Wikipedia: List of countries with overseas military bases The stalling of projects is temporary, and they may resume afterwards. Also, it's from a report by Gwadar Pro that CPEC has generated around 75,000 jobs for locals in Pakistan. Chinese labor makes only 17.5 % of the total number of labor currently working on CPEC while 82.5% labor included Pakistani citizens. All the projects are going as per schedule, within agreed framework. Out of total 88, 19 projects have already been completed, 28 are under implementation and 41 projects are in the pipeline. While 28 projects which are under implementation comprise projects like wind power plant, solar power plant, hydro power project and construction of special economic zones. Forty one pipeline projects are already approved; their paperwork has been completed but the work on it has not started yet. Either they have been delayed due to the finance collections or are waiting for the right time to start. According to the report, for the past 6 years CPEC has generated around 75,000 jobs for Pakistani citizens alone. Nearly 47,000 people are working right now on various CPEC projects even during the epidemic crisis. Out of these, 40,000 people are Pakistani citizens including labors, engineers and technicians making around 82.5%. The other 7,000 are Chinese which include senior engineers and the Chinese labor force makes 17.5 % of the total number. Where does AidData Research Institute state that China is 100% using debt trap? I looked at AidData Research Institutes papers on China and there was no confirmation of a debt trap of any sort, are you making up claims against China that's all? China forgives only 0.1% of BRI's total budget because those are the countries that are unable to pay off their loans. I mean, what? Are you expecting China to forgive 100% of BRI's loans then you'll be happy? What kind of business model are you proposing? And which of those countries have been taken over by China? Answer: None!
    1
  22913.  @distinctga5811  Don't look at just short-term forecasts. Longer-term forecasts suggest that today’s developing and emerging countries are likely to account for nearly 60% of world GDP by 2030, according to a report by Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The strong performance of China and India has had a significant impact on the rest of the developing world. Climate Change is affecting all, not just India, but also European countries with heatwaves as well as the California wildfires in the U.S. Also, Russia's economy is in better shape than many forecast and has avoided the meltdown many predicted after the flurry of sanctions slapped on it, that's why the Russian ruble was crowned the best performing currency this year. Russia bought US$6.7 billion worth of goods from China in July, as supply chains adapt in the wake of Western sanctions. Overall, Russia’s imports grew by 49.3% in July, following increases of 56% in June and 79.6% in May. You said: "By sanctioning it. They are rapidly developing alternative sources to gas and the alternatives already exist for oil." Europe sanctioning Russian oil is what amounts to energy blackmail. And what are some examples of alternative sources to gas and oil does Europe have? U.S is decreasing their LNG exports to Europe, and Saudi Arabia have stated that they aren't going to expand oil production beyond 13 million barrels per day. You said: "A price cap isn't about Russian energy, it's about the rest of the market." Then why is the G7 price cap specifically targeting Russian oil? Isn't this going against the principles of a free market economy if they impose a price cap on commodities instead of letting market forces determine the price of oil? And it's not the price cap that's affecting developing countries, Russia is perfectly capable of selling their oil to developing countries like China and India (even at a discount). However, Russia has chosen not to sell its oil to countries that impose a price cap on Russian oil (i.e the G7 countries). If the EU can afford the higher cost of energy and food, then why are there protests against inflation in Prague (Czech Republic), Leipzig (Germany), Naples (Italy), Sweden and the UK? Already, Germany is resorting to rationing energy by advising its citizens to take shorter hot showers during winter. And you're saying the EU can afford the higher prices as well as investing capital into developing alternative sources? Such as?
    1
  22914.  @distinctga5811  Chinese company SMIC has made a chip breakthrough in the manufacture of 7 nm chips for semiconductors and possibly advancing their production capabilities by two generations, in defiance of U.S sanctions of EUV machines to China. Also, experts have said that it is technically possible for SMIC to produce 7-nm chips even without the most advanced production equipment. Also, humans are approaching the theoretical limits of just how far we can small we can make silicon chips. Eventually, scientists will no longer be able to make silicon chips any smaller, and Moore's law is predicted to be broken once this limit is reached. However, if we change the base material from silicon to graphene or carbon nanotubes (i.e Carbon-based chips) then it's possible that scientists can surpass the theoretical limits imposed by silicon-based chips. Carbon chips also have the advantage of being potentially faster, more efficient with lower energy requirements than silicon chips. The available evidence shows that silicon transistors perform five times worse than transistors of nano-carbons in an experimental setting. China is investing heavily into carbon-based chips, and if humanity should someday make the leap from silicon-chips to carbon-based chips, it would level the playing field as silicon wafer fabrication becomes obsolete in the face of carbon-based chip fabrication. If successful, China stands to leap ahead in chip production in this area.
    1
  22915.  @distinctga5811  "神州 Shenzhou The US, France, EU, Japan, United Kingdom, Germany, Turkey all have major influence in the decisions made by the West." Except for Turkiye, the rest of the countries you mentioned are all basically agree with the stance of the U.S. This is the consequence of the uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (that of the U.S and it's allies) whereas China and Russia are facilitating the transition towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices. Prior to the 2014 Crimea Referendum, polling in 2008 by the Ukrainian Centre for Economic and Political Studies, found that 63.8% of Crimeans (76% of ethnic Russians, 55% of ethnic Ukrainians, and 14% of ethnic Crimean Tatars, respectively) would like Crimea to secede from Ukraine and join Russia. From March 12 – 14, 2014, Germany's largest pollster, the GfK Group, conducted a survey with 600 respondents and found that 70.6% of Crimeans intended to vote for joining Russia, 10.8% for restoring the 1992 constitution, and 5.6% did not intend to take part in the referendum. So it seems the end result is that many Crimeans did took part in the referendum and an overwhelming majority voted for Crimea to join the Russian Federation. SWIFT cannot be trusted when a country can be cut off from it's foreign reserves just like that. The question is why was Brazil punished by the U.S just for supporting the Crimean Referendum where the overwhelming majority (96.77%) voted to join the Russian Federation? The U.S isn't obligated to help anyone, but at the same time, Brazil shouldn't have to sign up with the U.S political stance against Russia in Crimea, what has that even got to do with conducting business in Brazil? The democratic result was the Crimeans voted to join the Russian Federation, then can't Brazil support democracy in Crimea?
    1
  22916.  @distinctga5811  By your own admission, climate change does affect all, and even Europe is experiencing heat waves, wildfires, floods. India is also one of the top agricultural producers and what affects India would also affect other countries that they export their agricultural produce too. Also, there are mass protests in European cities like Prague (Czech), Leizping (Germany) and Paris (France) over inflation. You said: "The US and other western countries are the primary driver of development in the third world." Take Africa for example, and China has overtaken the US to become the world’s largest foreign direct investor into Africa. China has maintained its position as the largest investor in Africa over the last 10 years by the number of new jobs created (18’562 on average), with a gradual substantial increase of newly created jobs on a yearly basis, according to a report by Swiss-African Business Circle. The report showed that China did on average in the last 10 years 27% of its investments in Africa. The report also ranked the US as the second-largest investor, followed by France, and Turkey, in third and fourth positions, respectively. Didn't I mention earlier that the Russian ruble is literally the best performing currency this year? According to the Russian Economy Minister Maxim Reshetnikov, the Russian economy is set to return to growth on a quarterly basis in late 2022 or 2023. Could you list what are the alternative sources of oil you speak of? You said: "In terms of natural gas it's not about "is there enough" it's "how can you transport it" Take Qatar for example, they have stated that neither Qatar nor any other single country has the capacity to replace Russian gas supplies to Europe with LNG. Most of Qatari volumes are locked into long-term contracts mostly to Asian buyers, the amount of divertable volumes that can be shipped to Europe is only 10-15% according to Qatar's energy minister. Let's get this straight. Oil sellers like Saudi Arabia had indeed implemented a production cap (around 12 million barrels a day) but Russia did not. Also the G7 price cap specifically targets Russian oil then doesn't this goes against the principles of a free market? In a free market, it is market forces that drive prices. As a result, Russia has taken a stance to not sell oil to countries that impose an price cap on its oil, instead they are selling it to other buyers like China and India for example. So if a countries people are continuously protesting against the higher inflation prices, doesn't it mean that its government is unable to deliver what the people want? Also, who said anything about a complete lack of natural gas? Protesting is linked to higher prices is due to a shortage of heating in Europe, so much such that EU countries are considering taking energy-saving measures like shorter hot showers and not setting the temperature above a certain limit.
    1
  22917.  @distinctga5811  "神州 Shenzhou I was looking at longer term forecasts." Then you should know that longer-term forecasts suggest that today’s developing and emerging countries are likely to account for nearly 60% of world GDP by 2030, according to a report by Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
    1
  22918.  @distinctga5811  China has shown that it can produce 7 nm chips despite U.S sanctions, so it's probably only a matter of time before China can produce 7nm chips for other purposes. China has overtaken the U.S in quantum computing. In 2019, Google announced that its 53-qubit Sycamore processor had completed a task that would have taken a conventional supercomputer at least 2.5 days in 3.3 minutes. China's 66-qubit Zuchongzhi 2 quantum processor reportedly completed the same task 1 million times faster in October. That processor was created by a team of researchers from the Chinese Academy of Sciences Center for Excellence in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics collaborated with the Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics and the Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology.
    1
  22919.  @distinctga5811  If we look at the history of Crimea, it was never historically part of Ukraine, it was incorporated into the Russian Empire by Catherine the Great in 1983 from the defeated Ottoman Empire. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, The short-lived Republic of Crimea was founded in 1992, but by 1995 it was forcibly abolished by Ukraine with the Autonomous Republic of Crimea established firmly under Ukrainian authority. Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British couldn't get enough of Chinese tea, but China did not want what Britain had to offer, so Britain waged two wars with China and force us to open our ports to opium, which China didn't want because it made our people sick. Hong Kong was seized and made into an hub to spread the poison throughout the rest of China. Also, Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to its constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. You said: "You can't have it both ways." Personally I don't care about Crimea's status, but if you're of the view that "Crimea belongs to all of Ukraine, not just the people that live there now."_ then likewise, I could also say Taiwan belongs to all of mainland China, not just the people that live there. If Taiwan is to conduction any referendum towards independence, then it should also involve the people of mainland China, due to the fact that Taiwan has been a part of China for the past 100 years (and more). You can't have it both ways. If Brazil is free to do whatever it wants, then it wouldn't have to be forced to sign up with the U.S stance regarding Crimea. What is Crimea even got to do with the U.S policy anyway? If anything, you're just proving that we are indeed living in a uni-polar world dominated by a single voice (that of the U.S and its allies) and it is China and Russia that are facilitating the transition towards a multi-polar world dominated by multiple voices.
    1
  22920.  @distinctga5811  Who is to say what aspects of manufacturing are Western or not? If we look at inventions, Chinese have invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have revolutionized the world. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge much easier. The Compass made navigation much easier and reduced the risks of traveling and Gunpowder has changed the way we modern warfare is conducted. Even the West has made use of Chinese inventions, but do Chinese people complain about Westerners using our technology? A sanction is in response to some unlawful act? So what's the justification for the U.S slapping sanctions on chips to China? You said: "Next, you are comparing an accomplishment by the Chinese to an accomplishment by a single US company 3 years after the fact." Can't I conduct such a comparison? I mean, earlier you compared all of U.S to all of China, when you claimed: "The US is far ahead of China in quantum computing." You said: "so google is likely far beyond this mark set by the Chinese." Do you actually have evidence of this? You said: "Japan is also likely ahead of China." Do you actually have evidence of this?
    1
  22921.  @distinctga5811  Developing countries are more likely to align with China over the U.S, because China woos the developing world with offers of infrastructure developments, while the U.S strong arms them into submission. Brazil is one example that you brought up earlier after they refused to take the U.S stance regarding the Crimean democratic referendum. Also, like I said earlier, China has overtaken the U.S to become Africa's largest foreign direct investor, according to a report by Swiss-African Business Circle. Also just look at the BRICS countries and many in the developing world aspire to join it, including Iran, Argentina, and Egypt, what makes you think the U.S is far more liked abroad? Didn't you claimed earlier that Brazil's economy collapsed when they turned against the US to support Russia after the invasion of Crimea, so why would they be in support of the U.S? You said: "I would also bet on India surpassing China. It's doubtful China will ever be on top." Weren't you earlier devoting several paragraphs to India being in a particularly volatile situation according to climate change? That India will be impacted more and has less capability to deal with these impacts while having to take care of a massive amount of people? Now you've reversed this because of China's rise?
    1
  22922.  @distinctga5811  Saudi Arabia is actually buying oil from Russia at a cheaper price, while selling premium grade Saudi oil to European countries at a hefty profit. Even China is selling LNG to Europe at a hefty profit. The end result is European countries paying more for electricity and heating for a country that is not even a NATO member, yet Europeans are sacrificing their living standards for Ukraine? If EU has enough energy, then why are there massive protests over inflation in Czech Republic, Germany and France? You said: "Canada alone has twice the oil reserves as Russia and the infrastructure is mostly built out" The problem is that how is Canada going to ship their oil reserves across the Pacific Ocean to Europe? Russia has sufficient energy reserves for itself, but Europe clearly doesn't, and Canada is too far.
    1
  22923.  @distinctga5811  Developing countries are more likely to align with China over the U.S, because China woos the developing world with offers of infrastructure developments, while the U.S strong arms them. Brazil is one example that you brought up earlier after they refused to take the U.S stance regarding the Crimean democratic referendum. Also, like I said earlier, China has overtaken the U.S to become Africa's largest foreign direct investor, according to a report by Swiss-African Business Circle. Also just look at the BRICS countries and many in the developing world aspire to join it, including Iran, Argentina, and Egypt, what makes you think the U.S is far more liked abroad? Didn't you claimed earlier that Brazil's economy collapsed when they turned against the US to support Russia after the invasion of Crimea, so why would they be in support of the U.S? You said: "I would also bet on India surpassing China. It's doubtful China will ever be on top." Weren't you earlier devoting several paragraphs to India being in a particularly volatile situation according to climate change? That India will be impacted more and has less capability to deal with these impacts while having to take care of a massive amount of people? Now you've reversed this because of China's rise?
    1
  22924.  @distinctga5811  Developing countries are more likely to align with China over the U.S, because China woos the developing world with offers of infrastructure developments. Brazil is one example that you brought up earlier after they refused to take the U.S stance regarding the Crimean democratic referendum. Also, like I said earlier, China has overtaken the U.S to become Africa's largest foreign direct investor, according to a report by Swiss-African Business Circle. Also just look at the BRICS countries and many in the developing world aspire to join it, including Iran, Argentina, and Egypt, what makes you think the U.S is far more liked abroad? Didn't you claimed earlier that Brazil's economy collapsed when they turned against the US to support Russia after the invasion of Crimea, so why would they be in support of the U.S? You said: "I would also bet on India surpassing China. It's doubtful China will ever be on top." Weren't you earlier devoting several paragraphs to India being in a particularly volatile situation according to climate change? That India will be impacted more and has less capability to deal with these impacts while having to take care of a massive amount of people? Now you've reversed this because of China's rise?
    1
  22925.  @distinctga5811  Saudi Arabia is actually buying oil from Russia at a cheaper price, while selling their premium grade Saudi oil to European countries at a profit. Even China is selling LNG to Europe at a hefty profit. The end result is European countries paying more for electricity and heating for a country that is not even a NATO member, yet Europeans are lowering their living standards for Ukraine's sake? If EU has enough energy, then why are there massive protests over inflation in Czech Republic, Germany and France? Why is the EU resorting to "energy saving" measures like taking shorter hot showers, and not setting water heater temperatures above a certain figure? You said: "Canada alone has twice the oil reserves as Russia and the infrastructure is mostly built out" The problem is that how is Canada going to ship their oil reserves across the Pacific Ocean to Europe? Russia has sufficient energy reserves for itself, but Europe clearly doesn't, and Canada is too far. Russia has yet to call upon the services of their most invincible soldier, nicknamed General Frost, to pay Western European countries a visit during winter. If Europe can't fix their energy shortage by then, then it's possible that support for Ukraine would drop drastically.
    1
  22926.  @distinctga5811  Saudi Arabia is actually buying oil from Russia at a cheaper price, while selling their premium grade Saudi oil to European countries at a profit. Even China is selling LNG to Europe at a hefty profit. The end result is European countries paying more for electricity and heating for a country that is not even a NATO member. If EU has enough energy, then why are there massive protests over inflation in Czech Republic, Germany and France? Why is the EU resorting to "energy saving" measures like taking shorter hot showers, and not setting water heater temperatures above a certain figure? You said: "Canada alone has twice the oil reserves as Russia and the infrastructure is mostly built out" The problem is that how is Canada going to ship their oil reserves across the Pacific Ocean to Europe? Russia has sufficient energy reserves for itself, but Europe clearly doesn't, and Canada is too far. Russia has yet to call upon the services of their most invincible soldier, nicknamed General Frost, to pay Western European countries a visit during winter. If Europe can't fix their energy shortage by then, then it's possible that support for Ukraine would drop drastically.
    1
  22927.  @distinctga5811  Saudi Arabia is actually buying oil from Russia at a cheaper price, while selling their higher grade Saudi oil to European countries at a profit. Even China is selling LNG to Europe at a hefty profit. The end result is European countries paying more for electricity and heating than before. If EU has enough energy, then why is the EU resorting to "energy saving" measures like taking shorter hot showers, and not setting water heater temperatures above a certain figure? You said: "Canada alone has twice the oil reserves as Russia and the infrastructure is mostly built out" The problem is that how is Canada going to ship their oil reserves across the Pacific Ocean to Europe? Russia has sufficient energy reserves for itself, but Europe clearly doesn't, and Canada is too far. Russia has yet to call upon the services of their most invincible soldier, nicknamed General Frost, to pay Western European countries a visit during winter. If Europe can't fix their energy shortage by then, then it's possible that support for Ukraine would drop drastically.
    1
  22928.  @distinctga5811  Saudi Arabia is actually buying oil from Russia at a cheaper price, while selling their higher grade Saudi oil to European countries at a profit. Even China is selling LNG to Europe at a hefty profit. The end result is European countries paying more for electricity and heating than before. If EU has enough energy, then why is the EU resorting to "energy saving" measures like taking shorter hot showers, and not setting water heater temperatures above a certain figure? You said: "Canada alone has twice the oil reserves as Russia and the infrastructure is mostly built out" The problem is that how is Canada going to ship their oil reserves across the Pacific Ocean to Europe? Russia has sufficient energy reserves for itself, but Europe clearly doesn't, and Canada is too far. Russia has yet to call upon the services of their most invincible soldier, nicknamed General Frost, to pay Western European countries a visit during winter. If Europe can't fix their energy shortage by then, then it's possible that support for Ukraine would drop drastically.
    1
  22929.  @distinctga5811  Wasn't India one of the countries you singled out that's going to suffer the effects of climate change? Yet you would bet on India surpassing China and that it's doubtful China will ever be on top? Speaking of computing, China actually ranks top in the world in the TOP500 fastest supercomputers at 173 systems overtaking the U.S with their 149 systems in comparison. Distribution of supercomputers in the TOP500 list by country (as of November 2021) 1. China (173) 2. United States (149) 3. Japan (32) 4. Germany (26) 5. France (19) 6. Canada (11) 7. United Kingdom (11) 8. South Korea (7) 9. Russia (7) 10. Italy (6) ... Source: TOP500 Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion). This implies that China's scientists have access to some of the most advanced computational resources in which to conduct their research.
    1
  22930.  @distinctga5811  How is the U.S morally superior both in the present and historically to China? U.S was built upon the backs of slaves imported from Africa, and by causing genocide of Native Americans and occupation of their lands even till today, how is this morally superior historically? Even today, the U.S is involved in wars in the Middle East. Research conducted by the Jang Group and Geo Television Network revealed that the U.S has been at war for 92% of its entire life. Since it's inception in 1776, the U.S has only been at peace for 15 years out of 244 years. China has invested over $70 billion in Africa over the last five years, making it the continent’s largest investor with 287 projects. As a result, many African countries tend toward a favorable view of China, viewing China’s economic and political influence on their countries favorably, saying it’s “somewhat positive” or “very positive.” The survey, which was carried out by Afrobarometer, a Ghana-based pan-African nonprofit and research network, polled 48,084 respondents from 34 countries. You said: "yes India faces some very serious challenges, but at the very least they won't be cut off from the rest of the world like China is a bout to be." This appears to be merely your own speculation of China being cut off from the rest of the world, but everyone knows that China is too deeply integrated into global supply chains and that decoupling is virtually impossible. Furthermore, like China, India also did not condemn Russia, so this might be taken negatively in the West as India being on Russia's side.
    1
  22931.  @distinctga5811  How is the U.S morally superior both in the present and historically to China? U.S caused genocide of Native Americans and occupy their lands even till today, how is this morally superior historically? Even today, the U.S is involved in wars in the Middle East. Research conducted by the Jang Group and Geo Television Network revealed that the U.S has been at war for 92% of its entire life. Since it's inception in 1776, the U.S has only been at peace for 15 years out of 244 years. China has invested over $70 billion in Africa over the last five years, making it the continent’s largest investor with 287 projects. As a result, many African countries tend toward a favorable view of China, viewing China’s economic and political influence on their countries favorably, saying it’s “somewhat positive” or “very positive.” The survey, which was carried out by Afrobarometer, a Ghana-based pan-African nonprofit and research network, polled 48,084 respondents from 34 countries. You said: "yes India faces some very serious challenges, but at the very least they won't be cut off from the rest of the world like China is a bout to be." This appears to be merely your own speculation of China being cut off from the rest of the world, but everyone knows that China is too deeply integrated into global supply chains and that decoupling is virtually impossible. Furthermore, like China, India also did not condemn Russia, so this might be taken negatively in the West as India being on Russia's side.
    1
  22932.  @distinctga5811  How is the U.S morally superior both in the present and historically to China? Even today, the U.S is involved in wars in the Middle East. Research conducted by the Jang Group and Geo Television Network revealed that the U.S has been at war for 92% of its entire life. Since it's inception in 1776, the U.S has only been at peace for 15 years out of 244 years. China has invested over $70 billion in Africa over the last five years, making it the continent’s largest investor with 287 projects. As a result, many African countries tend toward a favorable view of China, viewing China’s economic and political influence on their countries favorably, saying it’s “somewhat positive” or “very positive.” The survey, which was carried out by Afrobarometer, a Ghana-based pan-African nonprofit and research network, polled 48,084 respondents from 34 countries. You said: "yes India faces some very serious challenges, but at the very least they won't be cut off from the rest of the world like China is a bout to be." This appears to be merely your own speculation of China being cut off from the rest of the world, but everyone knows that China is too deeply integrated into global supply chains and that decoupling is virtually impossible. Furthermore, like China, India also did not condemn Russia, so this might be taken negatively in the West as India being on Russia's side.
    1
  22933.  @distinctga5811  How is the U.S morally superior both in the present and historically to China? U.S was built upon the backs of slaves imported from Africa, and by causing genocide of Native Americans and occupation of their lands even till today, how is this morally superior historically? China has invested over $70 billion in Africa over the last five years, making it the continent’s largest investor with 287 projects. As a result, many African countries tend toward a favorable view of China, viewing China’s economic and political influence on their countries favorably, saying it’s “somewhat positive” or “very positive.” The survey, which was carried out by Afrobarometer, a Ghana-based pan-African nonprofit and research network, polled 48,084 respondents from 34 countries. You said: "yes India faces some very serious challenges, but at the very least they won't be cut off from the rest of the world like China is a bout to be." This appears to be merely your own speculation of China being cut off from the rest of the world, but everyone knows that China is too deeply integrated into global supply chains and that decoupling is virtually impossible. Furthermore, like China, India also did not condemn Russia, so this might be taken negatively in the West as India being on Russia's side.
    1
  22934.  @distinctga5811  Printing is a process for mass reproducing text and images using a master form or template. The earliest known form of printing as applied to paper was woodblock printing, which appeared in China before 220 AD for cloth printing. If not for Chinese invention of printing, then books and other publications would not be as widespread as they are today, that's why it's regarded as one of China's Four Great Inventions. You said: "Guns are the accomplishment." Handcannons and guns too were invented in China. The world's oldest surviving firearm is the Heilongjiang (黑龙江) hand cannon which dated to 1288. It was discovered at a site in modern-day Acheng District where the History of Yuan records that battles were fought at that time. It weighs 3.55 kg (7.83 pounds) and is 34 centimeters (13.4 inches) long. The cannon currently resides at the Heilongjiang Provincial Museum in Harbin, China. It's true that before the invention of the Compass, people navigated through other means such as using the Sun and the Stars. But on cloudy days where the Sun and Stars are not visible, the compass provided a reliable method to determine directions and reduce the chances of getting lost, and now navigators all over the world use the compass after its invention in China. The Egyptians had papyrus which is not the same as paper. Paper has since overtaken papyrus as the choice material for writing on. Besides inventing paper, Chinese also invented the paper banknote which proved more popular to carry around than metal coinage or precious stones. You said: "It's interesting that you refer to these as "The Four Great Inventions". These are all fairly simple things that are emulated in different forms throughout the world." Because they are great inventions that revolutionized the world. They only appear simple today, but back then, they certainly weren't simple. The Greeks and Romans created flammable combinations but just aren't the same as Gunpowder. Paper is not the same as papyrus, and the compass could be used when skies were not visible due to cloud cover or bad weather. Printing was invented in China whether you like it not. I mean, take the crossbow for example, it's a simple invention but it was invented in China because archaeologists have uncovered crossbow mechanisms made of bronze dating back to 7th century BC. The invention of the crossbow allowed untrained peasants to face off against well-trained archers during the medieval period.
    1
  22935.  @distinctga5811  You said: "An child could presume this, however you seem to lack the intelligence of a child." So all you have is a child's presumption and no concrete evidence? Then you could very well be wrong on your presumptions that Google is far ahead of their 2019 mark, whereas China's quantum computer, Zuchongzhi 2, which is a 66-qubit programmable superconducting quantum computer is an incredible 10 million times faster than Google's 55-qubit Sycamore, making China's new machine the fastest in the world, and the first to beat Google's in two years. You said: "IBM, who will exceed 1000 qubits in 2023." There's no guarantee that IBM will achieve that by 2023, it just falls into your speculation. You said: "神州 Shenzhou China's treatment of their Islamic minorities to the West is broadly condemned and a valid justification for sanctions" If you're referring to Xinjiang, then ambassadors from 65 countries have voice support to China's position on Xinjiang and issued a joint statement at UN Human Rights Council. compared to the 44 countries that don't support China's stance. You said: "神州 Shenzhou Canada is not too far from Europe to ship oil." How is Canada going to ship oil to Europe in amounts that can rival Russia? Russia delivers gas to Europe through pipeline, which is cheap and continuous, whereas Canada would need to send tankers and this is going to mean more expensive energy for European countries. You said: "Yes, Europe is decreasing it's disposable income for the general population to help Ukraine." For what? Ukraine isn't even a NATO member for crying out loud, yet the ordinary West Europeans have to suffer rising inflation and lower their disposable income? No wonder why there are protests against inflation erupting across Europe, in Czech Republic, Germany and France. There are gas rationing measures such as reducing hot shower duration and capping maximum temperature for water heaters. And the very idea of a European price cap on Russian oil is worsening the situation, because Russia no longer wants to sell its oil to countries that impose a price cap (which goes against the principles of free market, in which prices are left to market forces to determine).
    1
  22936.  @distinctga5811  You said: "An child could presume this, however you seem to lack the intelligence of a child." So all you have is a child's presumption and no concrete evidence? Then you could very well be wrong on your presumptions that Google is far ahead of their 2019 mark, You said: "IBM, who will exceed 1000 qubits in 2023." There's no guarantee that IBM will achieve that by 2023, it just falls into your speculation. You said: "神州 Shenzhou China's treatment of their Islamic minorities to the West is broadly condemned and a valid justification for sanctions" If you're referring to Xinjiang, then ambassadors from 65 countries have voice support to China's position on Xinjiang and issued a joint statement at UN Human Rights Council. compared to the 44 countries that don't support China's stance. You said: "神州 Shenzhou Canada is not too far from Europe to ship oil." How is Canada going to ship oil to Europe in amounts that can rival Russia? Russia delivers gas to Europe through pipeline, which is cheap and continuous, whereas Canada would need to send tankers and this is going to mean more expensive energy for European countries. You said: "Yes, Europe is decreasing it's disposable income for the general population to help Ukraine." For what? Ukraine isn't even a NATO member for crying out loud, yet the ordinary West Europeans have to suffer rising inflation and lower their disposable income? No wonder why there are protests against inflation erupting across Europe, in Czech Republic, Germany and France. There are gas rationing measures such as reducing hot shower duration and capping maximum temperature for water heaters. And the very idea of a European price cap on Russian oil is worsening the situation, because Russia no longer wants to sell its oil to countries that impose a price cap (which goes against the principles of free market, in which prices are left to market forces to determine).
    1
  22937.  @distinctga5811  You said: "An child could presume this, however you seem to lack the intelligence of a child." So all you have is a child's presumption and no concrete evidence? Then you could very well be wrong on your presumptions that Google is far ahead of their 2019 mark, You said: "IBM, who will exceed 1000 qubits in 2023." There's no guarantee that IBM will achieve that by 2023, it just falls into your speculation. You said: "神州 Shenzhou China's treatment of their Islamic minorities to the West is broadly condemned and a valid justification for sanctions" If you're referring to Xinjiang, then ambassadors from 65 countries have voice support to China's position on Xinjiang and issued a joint statement at UN Human Rights Council. compared to the 44 countries that don't support China's stance.
    1
  22938.  @distinctga5811  You said: "An child could presume this, however you seem to lack the intelligence of a child." So all you have is a child's presumption and no concrete evidence? Then you could very well be wrong on your presumptions that Google is far ahead of their 2019 mark. You said: "IBM, who will exceed 1000 qubits in 2023." There's no guarantee that IBM will achieve that by 2023, it just falls into your speculation. You said: "神州 Shenzhou China's treatment of their Islamic minorities to the West is broadly condemned and a valid justification for sanctions" If you're referring to Xinjiang, even though 44 countries have raised concerns towards Xinjiang, this has been dismissed by 65 countries —led by Belarus—that sided with Beijing over Xinjiang issues. You said: "神州 Shenzhou Canada is not too far from Europe to ship oil." How is Canada going to ship oil to Europe in amounts that can rival Russia? Russia delivers gas to Europe through pipeline, which is cheap and continuous, whereas Canada would need to send tankers and this is going to mean more expensive energy for European countries. You said: "Yes, Europe is decreasing it's disposable income for the general population to help Ukraine." For what? Ukraine isn't even a NATO member for crying out loud, yet the ordinary West Europeans have to suffer rising inflation and lower their disposable income? No wonder why there are protests against inflation erupting across Europe, in Czech Republic, Germany and France. There are gas rationing measures such as reducing hot shower duration and capping maximum temperature for water heaters. And the very idea of a European price cap on Russian oil is worsening the situation, because Russia no longer wants to sell its oil to countries that impose a price cap (which goes against the principles of free market, in which prices are left to market forces to determine).
    1
  22939.  @distinctga5811  So all you have is a child's presumption and no concrete evidence? Then you could very well be wrong on your presumptions that Google is far ahead of their 2019 mark, whereas China's quantum computer, Zuchongzhi 2, which is a 66-qubit programmable superconducting quantum computer is an incredible 10 million times faster than Google's 55-qubit Sycamore, making China's new machine the fastest in the world, and the first to beat Google's in two years. You said: "IBM, who will exceed 1000 qubits in 2023." There's no guarantee that IBM will achieve that by 2023, it just falls into your speculation. You said: "神州 Shenzhou China's treatment of their Islamic minorities to the West is broadly condemned and a valid justification for sanctions" If you're referring to Xinjiang, then ambassadors from 65 countries have voice support to China's position on Xinjiang and issued a joint statement at UN Human Rights Council. compared to the 44 countries that don't support China's stance. You said: "神州 Shenzhou Canada is not too far from Europe to ship oil." How is Canada going to ship oil to Europe in amounts that can rival Russia? Russia delivers gas to Europe through pipeline, which is cheap and continuous, whereas Canada would need to send tankers and this is going to mean more expensive energy for European countries. You said: "Yes, Europe is decreasing it's disposable income for the general population to help Ukraine." For what? Ukraine isn't even a NATO member for crying out loud, yet the ordinary West Europeans have to suffer rising inflation and lower their disposable income? No wonder why there are protests against inflation erupting across Europe, in Czech Republic, Germany and France. There are gas rationing measures such as reducing hot shower duration and capping maximum temperature for water heaters. And the very idea of a European price cap on Russian oil is worsening the situation, because Russia no longer wants to sell its oil to countries that impose a price cap (which goes against the principles of free market, in which prices are left to market forces to determine).
    1
  22940.  @distinctga5811  So all you have is a presumption by a child and no concrete evidence? Then you could very well be wrong on your presumptions that Google is far ahead of their 2019 mark. You said: "IBM, who will exceed 1000 qubits in 2023." There's no guarantee that IBM will achieve that by 2023, it just falls into your speculation. You said: "神州 Shenzhou China's treatment of their Islamic minorities to the West is broadly condemned and a valid justification for sanctions" If you're referring to Xinjiang, even though 44 countries have raised concerns towards Xinjiang, this has been dismissed by 65 countries —led by Belarus—that sided with Beijing over Xinjiang issues. You said: "神州 Shenzhou Canada is not too far from Europe to ship oil." How is Canada going to ship oil to Europe in amounts that can rival Russia? Russia delivers gas to Europe through pipeline, which is cheap and continuous, whereas Canada would need to send tankers and this is going to mean more expensive energy for European countries. You said: "Yes, Europe is decreasing it's disposable income for the general population to help Ukraine." For what? Ukraine isn't even a NATO member for crying out loud, yet the ordinary West Europeans have to suffer rising inflation and lower their disposable income? No wonder why there are protests against inflation erupting across Europe, in Czech Republic, Germany and France. There are gas rationing measures such as reducing hot shower duration and capping maximum temperature for water heaters. And the very idea of a European price cap on Russian oil is worsening the situation, because Russia no longer wants to sell its oil to countries that impose a price cap (which goes against the principles of free market, in which prices are left to market forces to determine).
    1
  22941.  @distinctga5811  A presumption by a child is not concrete evidence. You could very well be wrong on your presumptions that Google is far ahead of their 2019 mark. You said: "IBM, who will exceed 1000 qubits in 2023." There's no guarantee that IBM will achieve that by 2023, it just falls into your speculation. You said: "神州 Shenzhou China's treatment of their Islamic minorities to the West is broadly condemned and a valid justification for sanctions" If you're referring to Xinjiang, even though 44 countries have raised concerns towards Xinjiang, this has been dismissed by 65 countries —led by Belarus—that sided with Beijing over Xinjiang issues. You said: "神州 Shenzhou Canada is not too far from Europe to ship oil." How is Canada going to ship oil to Europe in amounts that can rival Russia? Russia delivers gas to Europe through pipeline, which is cheap and continuous, whereas Canada would need to send tankers and this is going to mean more expensive energy for European countries.
    1
  22942.  @distinctga5811  So all you have is a presumption by a child and no concrete evidence? Then you could very well be wrong on your presumptions that Google is far ahead of their 2019 mark. You said: "IBM, who will exceed 1000 qubits in 2023." There's no guarantee that IBM will achieve that by 2023, it just falls into your speculation.
    1
  22943.  @distinctga5811  You said: "神州 Shenzhou China's treatment of their Islamic minorities to the West is broadly condemned and a valid justification for sanctions" If you're referring to Xinjiang, even though 44 countries have raised concerns towards Xinjiang, this has been dismissed by 65 countries —led by Belarus—that sided with Beijing over Xinjiang issues. You said: "神州 Shenzhou Canada is not too far from Europe to ship oil." How is Canada going to ship oil to Europe in amounts that can rival Russia? Russia delivers gas to Europe through pipeline, which is cheap and continuous, whereas Canada would need to send tankers and this is going to mean more expensive energy for European countries. You said: "Yes, Europe is decreasing it's disposable income for the general population to help Ukraine." For what? Ukraine isn't even a NATO member for crying out loud, yet the ordinary West Europeans have to suffer rising inflation and lower their disposable income? No wonder why there are protests against inflation erupting across Europe, in Czech Republic, Germany and France. There are gas rationing measures such as reducing hot shower duration and capping maximum temperature for water heaters. And the very idea of a European price cap on Russian oil is worsening the situation, because Russia no longer wants to sell its oil to countries that impose a price cap (which goes against the principles of free market, in which prices are left to market forces to determine).
    1
  22944.  @distinctga5811  You said: "An child could presume this, however you seem to lack the intelligence of a child." You're the one relying on a child's presumption here.
    1
  22945.  @distinctga5811  Well, show me the progress then, instead of claiming that a child could presume this. You're the one seeming to stoop to the intelligence of a child here with your words. Also if we look at overall patents by country in quantum technology, China has more than 3,000 patents, about twice as many as the U.S. When it comes to quantum communication and cryptography, China is in the lead. In terms of patents related to hardware in this field, such as devices that exchange photons, Huawei ranked second with 100 patents, and Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications ranked fourth with 84 patents. Chinese companies also hold many patents for software technology in this field. ... Source: China emerges as quantum tech leader while Biden vows to catch up - NikkeiAsia
    1
  22946.  @distinctga5811  1. Taiwan is not even an independent country, because even Taiwan's own constitution states that Taiwan is part of China. The 1972 Shanghai Communique is a document pledging that the United States acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China and that the United States Government does not challenge that position. 2. Mainland China is currently pursuing peaceful reunification with Taiwan, but it doesn't mean that the military option is off the table. China will only resort to the military option once all peaceful options have been exhausted. Also, China is the biggest trading partner of many countries, so it doesn't mean the world would cut off trade with China just because you believe in decoupling. There was clearly a genocide of Native Americans (not "American Indians", like you called it) and their populations have decreased. Sparsely populated is still populated, and it's likely that there would be more Native Americans in the U.S had the British not arrived. You said: "what really damaged the natives was the Virgin Soil Pandemic that ensued when the settlers arrived." So it's the settlers that damaged the native Americans when they brought over foreign illnesses.
    1
  22947.  @distinctga5811  China is not interested in spreading our ideology unlike the Soviet Union with communism (or the U.S with democracy). President Xi has stated that China's model is not for export, nor will China import other countries model. “We will not import other countries’ models, and will not export the China model,” Xi said. “We will provide more opportunities for the world through our development,” he said." Also are the U.S wars justifiable? Former President Bush had invaded Iraq on suspicion of harboring Weapons of Mass Destruction, but after the Iraq War, no WMDs were ever found in Iraq. The Iraq Body Count project recorded that some 200,000 Iraqi civilians were killed as a result of the U.S war in Iraq. Also the UN Secretary General Kofi Annan stated that the Iraq War was illegal and violated UN Charter. Whether a country likes U.S or not, doesn't change the fact that China has overtaken the U.S to become the largest foreign direct investor in Africa. Germany, Russia, Turkey and Mexico, a majority of people say that they have a negative view of the U.S. Whether you think Dictatorship or Democracy is better, it should be for the countries themselves to choose, not the U.S invading and imposing their brand of democracy onto other countries. Take Afghanistan for example and the U.S's democratic experiment ended in failure with the shambolic withdrawal of the U.S from Kabul after 20 years and pouring trillions of dollars into Afghanistan. The democratically elected Afghan President Ghani fled the country with carloads of U.S cash, while the 300,000 strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban in weeks with minimal resistance. About ethnic cleansing in China, the population of ethnic minorities (i.e Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongolians, Manchu, etc) in China actually grew over the years, because ethnic minorities aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. The proportion of Ethnic population in China has grown from 6.1% in 1953, to 8.04% in 1990, 8.41% in 2000, and 8.49% in 2010 and 8.89% in 2020, so what ethnic cleansing are you talking about? Also, the U.S stayed mostly out of WWII due to its policy of isolation, and they only joined in WWII against Japan because Pearl Harbor as bombed, not for China's sake. In total, China fought Japan for 14 years (1931-1945) with 11 years alone, while the U.S fought Japan for 3 years (1942-1945) with Chinese aid. And it was the USSR that not only suffered the most deaths out of WWII, but the USSR also inflicted the most damage onto the Germans.
    1
  22948.  @distinctga5811  About Quantum technology, in 2016, China launched the world's first quantum satellite named after the Chinese philosopher Micius (墨子) into orbit and demonstrated that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere, smashing the previous record held on Earth. Quantum entanglement is a complex phenomena, but in a nutshell, it is when two subatomic particles become an "entangled pair" and are able to influence each other's quantum states (won't go into further detail) seemingly regardless of the distance between the particles. One particle could be on the surface of the Earth and its entangled partner on the surface of the Moon, and yet they can still theoretically influence each other quantum states with no information passing in between them (that we can currently measure). The longest record for quantum entanglement on Earth is at a distance of 143 km in at experiment in the Canary Islands. But China demonstrated that two stations (Delingha and Lijiang station) located 1200 km apart to communicate directly through our quantum satellite. ... Source: YouTube: Quantum satellite achieves 'spooky action' at record distance As far as I know, this is a world first and China is the first to launch a working quantum satellite.
    1
  22949.  @distinctga5811  In 2016, China launched world's 1st quantum satellite, named Micius, (墨子) into orbit and demonstrated that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere, smashing the previous record held on Earth. Quantum entanglement (in a nutshell) is when two subatomic particles become an "entangled pair", able to influence their quantum states (won't go into detail here) seemingly regardless of the distance involved. One particle could be on the surface of the Earth, and the other on the surface of the Moon, and theoretically, they can still influence each other with no information (known to current science) passing in between them. The longest record for quantum entanglement on Earth is 143 km in at experiment in the Canary Islands. But China has allowed two stations (Delingha and Lijiang station) located 1200 km apart to communicate directly, through our quantum satellite, thus breaking the previous record and showcasing that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere. Source: YouTube: China's Quantum satellite achieves 'spooky action' at record distance And as far as I know, this is a world first, and China is the first to launch quantum satellite into space.
    1
  22950.  @distinctga5811  About China's Quantum achievements, in 2016, China launched the world's first quantum satellite into orbit, demonstrating that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere. The longest record for quantum entanglement on Earth is at a distance of 143 km in at experiment in the Canary Islands. But China demonstrated that two stations located 1200 km apart to communicate directly through our quantum satellite.
    1
  22951.  @distinctga5811  About China's Quantum achievements, in 2016, China launched the world's first quantum satellite into orbit, demonstrating that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere. The longest record for quantum entanglement on Earth is at a distance of 143 km in at experiment in the Canary Islands. But China demonstrated that two stations located 1200 km apart to communicate directly through our quantum satellite. ... Source: YouTube: Quantum satellite achieves 'spooky action' at record distance
    1
  22952.  @distinctga5811  About Quantum technology, in 2016, China launched the world's first quantum satellite named after the Chinese philosopher Micius (墨子) into orbit and demonstrated that the quantum entanglement effect works at distances above the stratosphere, smashing the previous record held on Earth. Quantum entanglement is a complex phenomena, but in a nutshell, it is when two subatomic particles become an "entangled pair" and are able to influence each other's quantum states (won't go into further detail) seemingly regardless of the distance between the particles. One particle could be on the surface of the Earth and its entangled partner on the surface of the Moon, and yet they can still theoretically influence each other quantum states with no information passing in between them (that we can currently measure). The longest record for quantum entanglement on Earth is at a distance of 143 km in at experiment in the Canary Islands. But China demonstrated that two stations (Delingha and Lijiang station) located 1200 km apart to communicate directly through our quantum satellite.
    1
  22953.  @distinctga5811  If you claim Taiwan is an independent country, then why is it that Taiwan cannot join the United Nations? Is there some force preventing Taiwan from joining the UN like an independent country can? Thus far, Taiwan has not made any amendments to their constitution, signifying a departure from their stance of someday retaking the mainland. And neither has Taiwan made any formal declaration of independence, so by default, Taiwan is part of China according to their own constitution. If Taiwan was independent, then why is it athletes from Taiwan can only compete in the Olympics under the name "Chinese Taipei"? Since you've acknowledged the U.S acknowledging the One China Policy that means you support the fact that Taiwan is part of China and that the U.S does not seek to challenge this position. Also, the U.S is not committed to peaceful reunification if they are sending officials to visit the island to inflame tensions along the Taiwan strait. President Xi offered to extend the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy to include Taiwan, allowing them to keep their government, their elections, their passport, currency and even keep their military, but be considered as having reunified with the mainland. This is the best course of action for reunification, but if Taiwan rejects it, then what is their proposal for the reunification process? Hong Kong clearly benefited from the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy, they have their own separate government, separate currency, passport, etc, so what abuse are you talking about? Hong Kong was previously taken from China and made into a British colony. During the 19th century, the British couldn't get enough of Chinese tea, but China did not want what the West had to offer, so the British waged two wars with China and force us to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made our people sick. Hong Kong was taken and made into a hub to spread the addiction throughout the rest of China. Only in 1997 was Hong Kong finally returned back to China, yet even then, China had to sign a Sino-British Declaration just for them to return what was originally ours. Taiwan is the mainland's core interest, so PRC will definitely go to war if necessary. But as currently there is no need to (since the U.S agree to the One China policy) then the PRC will only employ the military option once all peaceful options have been exhausted. Taiwan is NOT the U.S's core interest. Taiwan didn't even make onto a list of America's Top 10 concerns, so it's unlikely that USA will go to war with China over an island (like they haven't done with Russia over Ukraine). Most Americans are sick of war and would like their government to address local issues rather than intervene in other country's internal affairs.
    1
  22954.  @distinctga5811  Initially, Americans had no interest in Kuwait war, until a testimony by a young girl (Nayirah) appeared claiming that Iraqi soldiers were taking incubators and leaving the babies. The testimony was widely publicized and cited numerous times by U.S senators and President George H. W. Bush in their rationale to support Kuwait in the Gulf War. Eventually it succeeded in garnering ordinary American support for the Gulf War. However, it turns out it was a false testimony fabricated to mislead Americans into supporting the Gulf War. Same goes for the Iraq War, the former President Bush had invaded Iraq on suspicion of harboring WMDs, but after the Iraq War, it turns out there was no WMDs in Iraq. Those 1990s WMDs have long been decommissioned, yet the U.S used this as an excuse for invading Iraq. Around 200,000 Iraqi civilians have been killed (according to Iraq Body Count) and even the UN Secretary General Kofi Annan said the Iraq War was illegal and violated UN Charter.
    1
  22955.  @distinctga5811  Cantonese in Hong Kong clearly have their own government separate from the mainland and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections. For example, the Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam won the 2017 election garnering 777 out of 1200 votes, and all Beijing does is appoint the Chief Executive that Hong Kongers vote for. The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (Chinese: 中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议; Tibetan: བོད་ཞི་བས་བཅིངས་འགྲོལ་འབྱུང་ཐབས་སྐོར་གྱི་གྲོས་མཐུན་དོན་ཚན་བཅུ་བདུན་) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetan's themselves acknowledging that Tibet is a part of China. Even countries all over the world today recognize Tibet as part of China, since when you draw the Map of PRC 🇨🇳, Tibet is included as part of China. Tiananmen Square was where Chairman Mao proclaimed the founding of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 back in 1949, who says our own people didn't decide for ourselves? Do you actually have evidence that the Uighurs are in concentration camps? The U.S fabricated the Nayirah Testimony, as well as the claims of WMDs in Iraq, now their latest target is China, so they come up with claims of Uighurs being in concentration camps when there is solid proof. The issue was submitted to the International Criminal Court, but the court has asked for more evidence before it will be willing to open an investigation into claims of genocide against Uighur people by China.
    1
  22956.  @distinctga5811  If you ask people "What is Democracy?" you'll get a multitude of answers. One common definition is that democracy is a government of the people, by the people, for the people. By this definition, the U.S is not a democracy, it's a plutocracy with a government of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%. Because the U.S government isn't able to deliver what the ordinary Americans want. So what if you have the choice to vote for different candidates? The candidates presented just aren't want the people want, so is that a democracy because you get to vote for leaders? In China, the Chinese government is able to deliver what the ordinary Chinese want. We know this through surveys conducted by Harvard University and Ash Center, which revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Chinese government. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. So by this, it seems that China might even be perhaps more democratic than the United States, given that the Chinese government is able to deliver what the people want. The U.S government isn't able to do that, despite Americans having the option to vote candidates.
    1
  22957.  @distinctga5811  U.S could have been preparing to enter the war, but the fact remains that the U.S only joined China against Japan after Pearl Harbor was bombed. Remember, the Japanese invaded Manchuria in 1931 (8 years earlier than WWII) and the Americans were content to let the Japanese occupy more and more Chinese territory. China fought Japan for 14 years, of course there will be Chinese territory that's occupied by Japan e.g Manchuria for example. But China wasn't defeated by the Japanese, because China wasn't fully conquered, so why are you deliberately looking down on Chinese contributions to the war? Why are you laughing (i.e HAHAHA) at Chinese aiding the U.S during WW2? China had kept the Japanese occupied and caused them to overextend themselves. Like I said, China had been fighting Japan for 14 years (1931-1945), compared to the U.S fighting for just 3 years (1942-1945). Remember, the U.S was initially practicing a policy of isolation so while the Soviets suffered immense casualties and damage to their economy, the U.S was relatively unscathed. I mean, if your country wasn't involved in the war (like the U.S before Pearl Harbor) then of course your economy can develop while European and Asian economies suffered during WWII. Also, the U.S was far from the war in Europe and Asia, so of course U.S didn't suffer as many casualties as Russia and China did. Also, the Soviets inflicted the most damage onto the Germans than their Western counterparts, accounting for 76 percent of Germany’s military dead. Also the very last battle fought of WWII was the Soviet Invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria in Aug 1945, that finally caused the Japanese to surrender at the end of WWII. So if anything, we should be thanking the Communists for putting an end to WWII.
    1
  22958.  @distinctga5811  You said: "LOL "The Chinese fought for 14 year" They GOT SMOKED for 14 years LOL." I get the feeling that you're just basically anti-China that's all. In my earlier post, I talked about how whenever I bring up China's achievements, some Westerners just laugh and mock China's accomplishments. Well, this is exactly the kind of behavior you are exhibiting. We've been talking for a while now and you've taken every opportunity to throw mud on China whenever I mention China's achievements of any sort. And it's "not just against the CPC", you've even stooped to mocking China's Four Great Inventions as "simple" as well as laugh at Chinese participation in WWII. So it's apparent for a while now, that from your words that, you intrinsically harbor some sort of grudge towards China, even towards our people as whole.
    1
  22959.  @distinctga5811  Both the Republic of China 🇹🇼 and the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 agree on the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China. They may be separate entities, but NOT separate countries, even the 1972 Shanghai Communique pledged that the United States acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China and that the United States Government does not challenge that position. ... Source: Wikipedia: Shanghai Communique (Also, the U.K does not have to declare independence from U.S, but the reverse is true, that the U.S needs to declare independence from the U.K. Taiwan thus far has not made any amendments to its constitution, so by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.) The U.S does not support peaceful reunification, because if it did, the U.S won't be sending warships and aircraft carriers across the Pacific Ocean to the Taiwan Straits. The U.S is clearly stoking tensions this way, and even by sending U.S officials to visit the island (and such officials even support Taiwan independence). The brother-and-sister analogy is inaccurate, given that Taiwan is more a family member of China than of the U.S, and it's the U.S that's interfering with Taiwan's reunification with the mainland. Mainlanders are taught that the people of Taiwan are our brothers and sisters, whereas the Americans certainly do not consider Taiwan as their family members. You said: "These visits are a response to hostile behavior." Remember that it is those visits that trigered the mainland response in the first place. President Xi had phoned President Biden on the consequences of the House of Speakers visit to the island, and yet the U.S allowed the visit to take place. This shows that the U.S is not committed to peaceful reunification, if it was, they would avoid taking actions that inflame tension in the Taiwan strait.
    1
  22960.  @distinctga5811  Chinese government did not violate the Sino-British Declaration by allowing Hong Kong to vote for individuals that Beijing chose. According to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條): "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government." - Article 45, Hong Kong Basic Law Therefore, the Central People's Government (aka Beijing) reserves the right to appoint the Hong Kong Chief Executive, and this does not violate the Sino-British Declaration, as this was written in to Hong Kong Basic Law. Also, the fact remains that the people of Hong Kong get to vote for their favorite leaders, while Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections. You said: "By doing so Beijing was able to put into power a leadership that passed laws which allow Beijing to impose the laws of the mainland onto Hong Kong" You can still do things in Hong Kong that are not allowed in the mainland. For example, Falun Dafa is forbidden in mainland China, while it is still allowed in Hong Kong. Not all of mainland China's laws apply in Hong Kong, for example the Great Chinese Firewall does not cover Hong Kong and the people there can access YouTube, Facebook, Google, without the need for a VPN. The only law imposed is that Hong Kong is part of China, which makes up the One Country part of the One Country, Two Systems policy. You said: "effectively demolishing any separation between the two systems(this is what caused the mass protests)." If you're referring to the 2019 Hong Kong protests, it was because of an extradition bill proposed by Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam over a extradition case. A Hong Kong man (named Chan) had strangled his pregnant girlfriend (named Poon) in Taiwan, and flew back to Hong Kong while leaving her body behind for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Taiwan wanted to extradite this Hong Kong murderer to face justice for his crimes, but Hong Kong realized that there is no extradition process with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred outside of Hong Kong, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to convict Chan (who has since confessed) and there is no justice for the victim's family. That's why Carrie Lam proposed the Hong Kong Extradition Bill to cover up this legal loophole. Yet the Hong Kong protestors started rioting even though they haven't read the bill and understood its contents in their entirety. So how is this related to the mainland? You said: "You are either disconnected with what is going on in Hong Kong" You don't even know what caused the 2019 Hong Kong riots, it was an extradition bill with Taiwan, yet you blame mainland China for it? You said: "...or don't understand what it means to have two systems or to be a democracy." Hong Kong clearly has a separate government, and the people hold elections to vote for their favorite leaders, then how is Hong Kong not a democracy? You're the one that seems to lack understanding of Hong Kong, yet you turn around and accuse me of being disconnected?
    1
  22961.  @distinctga5811  You said: "The very rule over Hong Kong in the past condones the British conquest of the island because each acquisition was through force." So you agreed that Britain's conquest of the island was made through force. But Hong Kong was eventually returned to PRC in peace during the 1997 Hong Kong handover. Then why is it that you refuse to accept the fact that Hong Kong is part of China today? You said: "Also, the British took Hong Kong from the Qing dynasty if I'm not mistaken, not the PRC and turned it into a prosperous democratic financial center in East Asia." You're mistaken then. Previously before 1997, Hong Kong was under the authoritarian colonial rule of Britain, during which no elections were held by the people of Hong Kong. Hong Kong was a Crown colony of the United Kingdom and maintained an administration roughly modelled after the Westminster system. The Governor of Hong Kong was appointed by the British monarch to serve as the representative of the Crown in the colony. T Hong Kong only became a democracy during the period of the 1997 handover, when the One Country, Two Systems policy was established to allow Hong Kong people to vote for their favorite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong finally have democracy when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony? You said: "The Cantonese don't want to be apart of the mainland." I think you meant to say "The Cantonese don't want to be apart from the mainland." I mean, Cantonese literally live in the mainland, the place called Canton (now Guangzhou) where the Cantonese come from is literally in mainland China.
    1
  22962.  @distinctga5811  U.S is fighting Russia down to the very last drop of Ukrainian blood. They will do the same with Taiwanese blood. Right now, the PRC is committed to peaceful reunification with Taiwan (since there is currently no outbreak of war in the Taiwan Strait). Whether they identifying as Taiwanese or Chinese doesn't change the fact that Taiwan is part of China, it's like people in Shanghai identifying as Shanghainese (上海人) but regardless, Shanghai is still part of China, much like Taiwan is. When it comes to declaring independence, the polls indicate that only a minority (5.6%) of the people of Taiwan want independence, the overwhelming majority (87%) want the status quo to continue. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Any move to declare independence would be seen as changing the status quo, an outcome that the majority of the people of Taiwan do not support. You said: "I guarantee that Taiwan will never choose to join the PRC." Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out stems from (perceived) U.S support. But it's no secret that the U.S is in decline and China is rising. As long as peace prevails, the U.S will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise, by which Taiwan's backing would evaporate, and reunification becomes inevitable. You said: "神州 Shenzhou The US saved Kuwait and Iraq from the rule of a brutal dictator. This is a fact that you run from." That's just your way to justify U.S involvement in wars in Iraq, using false testimonies like Nayirah's incubator testimony, and also claims of WMDs in Iraq when no WMDs were ever found. The Iraq Body Count recorded some 200,000 Iraqi civilian deaths as a result of the Iraq War, and even UN Secretary General Kofi Annan said the Iraq War was illegal and violated UN Charter. I suggest you watch the documentary: The Warmonger's Legacy to find out the truth about American wars. Also, Libya under Muammar Gaddafi was arguably Africa's most prosperous democracy until the U.S invasion reduced Libya to a shadow of its former self.
    1
  22963.  @distinctga5811  U.S is fighting Russia down to the very last Ukrainian. They will do the same with the Taiwanese. Right now, the PRC is committed to peaceful reunification with Taiwan (since there is currently no outbreak of war in the Taiwan Strait). Whether they identifying as Taiwanese or Chinese doesn't change the fact that Taiwan is part of China, it's like people in Shanghai identifying as Shanghainese (上海人) but regardless, Shanghai is still part of China, much like Taiwan is. When it comes to declaring independence, the polls indicate that only a minority (5.6%) of the people of Taiwan want independence, the overwhelming majority (87%) want the status quo to continue. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China. Any move to declare independence would be seen as changing the status quo, an outcome that the majority of the people of Taiwan do not support. You said: "I guarantee that Taiwan will never choose to join the PRC." Taiwan's ability to stubbornly hold out stems from (perceived) U.S support. But it's no secret that the U.S is in decline and China is rising. As long as peace prevails, the U.S will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise, by which Taiwan's backing would evaporate, and reunification becomes inevitable. You said: "神州 Shenzhou The US saved Kuwait and Iraq from the rule of a brutal dictator. This is a fact that you run from." That's just your way to justify U.S involvement in wars in Iraq, using false testimonies like Nayirah's incubator testimony, and also claims of WMDs in Iraq when no WMDs were ever found. The Iraq Body Count recorded some 200,000 Iraqi civilian deaths as a result of the Iraq War, and even UN Secretary General Kofi Annan said the Iraq War was illegal and violated UN Charter. I suggest you watch the documentary: The Warmonger's Legacy to find out the truth about American wars. Also, Libya under Muammar Gaddafi was arguably Africa's most prosperous democracy until the U.S invasion reduced Libya to a shadow of its former self.
    1
  22964.  @distinctga5811  Good to know that at least we've established that Hong Kong is part of China. The percentage of people of Hong Kong that don't want to be part of the PRC are in the minority, and do not represent the rest of Hong Kong people's views.
    1
  22965.  @zackk4969  How did China become the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people, if China has a culture of "eating baby?" What's the name of the renowned Chinese writer in Chinese characters?
    1
  22966.  @zackk4969  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"?
    1
  22967.  @zackk4393 Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"?
    1
  22968.  @zackk4393  Synopsis: The story was inspired from a fiction entitled “Diary of a madman” written by Nikolai Gogol in 1834. As the title suggests, the story outlines a diary written by a madman. The allegory was conveyed by a first-person narrator. source:wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Madman%27s_Diary#Synopsis
    1
  22969.  @MarkYeung1  China has finished clearing a backlog of stranded Australian coal. But analysts say it’s not likely that Chinese coal buyers will start purchasing new supplies of Australian coal anytime soon. That’s because coal inventories have been building up, local production is higher, and there are now higher supplies from exporters such as Russia purchased at a discount.
    1
  22970.  @MarkYeung1  China's bureaucracy sometimes means cargo gets stranded in ports, but the fact remains that China is importing Australian coal. Only that this time, local coal production is increasing and China might even be able to purchase Russian coal at a discount, so why bother with Australian coal? China's earlier blackouts were not caused by coal shortage, it was caused by a surge in demand for Chinese goods, prompting an increase in coal prices, but with the government strictly controlling electricity prices, coal-fired power plants are unwilling to operate at a loss, with many drastically reducing their output instead. So it wasn't coal shortage that caused the earlier blackouts (which has since been re-solved)
    1
  22971.  @MarkYeung1  In March 2021, China imported 300 metric tonnes of Australian Rock Lobster from Australia.
    1
  22972.  @pktang4618  Chinese President Xi Jinping has pledged to waive debts for the least developed African countries that have both high debt burdens and diplomatic ties with China. Speaking at the opening of a summit with African leaders in Beijing, Xi said his country would offer an extra $US60 billion ($83 billion) in financing to African countries. Source: China waives debt, promises 'no imposition of will' on African nations smh.com.au/world/asia/china-waives-debt-promises-no-imposition-of-will-on-african-nations-20180904-p501nr.html "In addition, for Africa's least developed countries, heavily indebted and poor countries, landlocked developing countries and small island developing countries that have diplomatic relations with China, the debt they have incurred in the form of interest-free Chinese government loans due to mature by the end of 2018 will be exempted," Xi said.
    1
  22973.  @pktang4618  What's wrong with African nations consistently voting in favour of UN resolutions in UN bodies that China supports? That's democracy in action, don't the EU, Canada and Australia consistently support the United States too? Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China youtu.be/TtduKDpy4oc China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  22974.  @pktang4618  Secondly, China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/b8cCsUBYSkw This makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity, some 856.4 billion kilowatt hours a year – more than double the amount produced by Brazil, in second place. The top three is completed by Canada, which produces 376.7 billion kilowatt hours a year. Source: China produces the most electricity from hydroelectric power weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/
    1
  22975.  @intothewrx  Bruce Lee isn't around anymore, but have you tried asking Jackie Chan whether he considers himself Chinese or not?
    1
  22976.  @intothewrx  Bruce Lee isn't around anymore, but have you tried asking Jackie Chan whether he considers himself Chinese or not?
    1
  22977.  @intothewrx  "神州 Shenzhou what was his answer?" Jackie Chan considers himself a proud Chinese.
    1
  22978.  @intothewrx  Bruce Lee isn't around anymore, how to ask him? Jackie Chan considers himself is a proud Chinese.
    1
  22979. Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous affair with a much older man has been exposed, and she's expressed a desire for personal privacy in a videocall with IOC. But the WTA would have none of that, and they are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see, instead of respecting her wish for privacy.
    1
  22980. I watched Oliver Stone's 2019 documentary, Revealing Ukraine (available on YT) where Oliver interviewed Medvedchuk and his wife, and it turns out that Putin is godfather to his children. He's a politician no doubt, but he seems to really care about his country and what Western powers did to de-industrialize Ukraine. Just search the documentary title here on YT for people wanting to know more about him.
    1
  22981.  @ritiktiwari9382  Chinese people don't want war, but that does not mean that Chinese military is weak. The People's Liberation Army is the world's largest land army and our tanks like China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank has commanded healthy respect from international observers, as its performance parameters are equal to many top Western designs (like the Russian T-90 and the US M1 Abrams), and the Type 99 also packs a few unique tricks of its own. Source: China's Deadly Type 99 Tank vs. Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/chinas-deadly-type-99-tank-vs-russias-t-90-americas-m-1-17836 China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank was even featured in our 70th anniversary National Day parade. Video: China's new generation main battlefield tanks revealed in National Day Parade youtu.be/Ec4Bu2orKTk
    1
  22982.  @jass1794  Too much talk and no action? Indians often complain incessantly about so-called "Pakistan Occupied Kashmir" yet why Indians don't take it back? India can't even handle their smaller neighbour, Pakistan yet India wants to take on their bigger neighbour, China?
    1
  22983.  Puneet Sharma  People in Vietnam eat dog meat too.
    1
  22984.  @theswinginrichard  India's industry is going to surpass China's soon? Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from India as opposed to China?
    1
  22985. Previously, Britain was the superpower of the 19th century, before being surpassed by the United States in the 20th century after WWII. I only hope that the U.S can accept its place much like Britain when China becomes one in the 21st century.
    1
  22986. Great Britain eventually accepted its place after WWII, so here's hoping that the U.S could do the same.
    1
  22987.  @billyehh  You're using past-tense so you're talking about the United States in the 1950s. But since you're aware that the UK got drained fighting the 2 World Wars, then have you considered that the same thing is happening with the U.S wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc? Then why is it you're unable to picture the same thing happening to the U.S as did to the U.K after WWII?
    1
  22988. Japanese people may appear overly polite and well-behaved at all times (really, at all times with no exceptions whatsoever) but this is subconsciously impacting their psyche. How are Japanese people ever going to let off steam and vent frustrations at all, when they expected to behave impeccably all the time? They are polite and considerate to foreigners (even rude ones) which is good for their national image, but bad for their people's mental well-being. That's why there is high stress levels and high number of suicides in Japan, because of these issues.
    1
  22989.  @timlin3243  What makes you think Cyrus is paid by President Xi Jinping? If you watch his video: "The Chinese Government Tried to Hire Me - You Won't Believe What I Did" it turns out that he declined the offer to be paid.
    1
  22990.  @timlin3243  "神州 Shenzhou of course he’s not paid personally by Xi Baozi. But this white Wumao is doing some business inside the WALL." Inside the Wall? So you're saying that anyone that does business inside China is somehow paid by the Chinese government? That's virtually every company in the world, from Apple, Nike, Tesla, Walmart, etc, you name it, they all do business inside China. Are they all paid wumao then?
    1
  22991.  @timlin3243  "神州 Shenzhou of course he’s not paid personally by Xi Baozi. But this white Wumao is doing some business inside the WALL." But virtually every company in the world does business inside China, are you implying they are all paid by the Chinese government?
    1
  22992.  @Andy-P  America is literally arming Ukrainian ultra-nationalist neo-Nazis by sending lethal aid to Ukraine.
    1
  22993.  @Andy-P  The fact remains that Taiwan was at it's most prosperous while under the authoritarian single-party KMT leadership instead of being under a democracy. Only when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Additionally, the cost of living in mainland China is (generally) cheaper than in Taiwan island, and Taiwan wage has stagnated for so long, that the government needs to raise it by two to three times to meet the cost of living or catch up with other advanced economies.
    1
  22994.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou All the while the Ukranians are willing to fight then the west should support them." It's been about 2 months since that comment, and there have been reports of Russia successfully taking out NATO HIMARS systems sent to Ukraine. Furthermore, Ukraine is using the HIMARS to attack Russian civilian targets like detention centers and killing their own Ukraine POWs housed in these centers (effectively constituting a war crime). Not only that but the Russian controlled nuclear power plant Zaporizhzhia has been shelled by Ukrainians.
    1
  22995.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou They are not Chinese." Taiwan certainly is Chinese at the least. As for the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands, I suggest you read up on its history of how it was taken from China by Japan during the war, and after Japan's WWII surrender, they agreed to relinquish all previously occupied territory, so the islands should be returned to China at the very least.
    1
  22996.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwan grew more under authoritarian regime - agreed. Then to grow more Taiwan needed to change it's policies." Change its economic policies yes, but what for reason should Taiwan change it's political system when it was doing so well under the previous authoritarian single-party system? As the saying goes: "If it ain't broken, why fix it?"
    1
  22997.  @Andy-P  Taiwan used to be one of Four Asian Tigers but since democracy was introduced to Taiwan, it's economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving for jobs in the mainland or Singapore "From the '90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreements on policy matters. This produced less effective policy making. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be more conservative in Taiwan, so they do not enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou, Research Fellow, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica ... Source: YouTube: _How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents | Insight | CNA Insider This suggests that Western style democracy has contributed to Taiwan's economic decline
    1
  22998.  @Andy-P  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  22999.  @Andy-P  You said: "Han China has succumbed to other civilisatons. The mongols - Yuan dynasty spring to mind" It was Kublai Khan (grandson of Genghis Khan) that choose to abandon his Mongolian ways and adopt Han Chinese culture, proclaiming himself Emperor of Yuan Dynasty (Great Yuan 大元) which is clearly Chinese. Otherwise, why call it Yuan 元 Dynasty instead of just Mongolian Empire? And who grows the food to feed the empire? The Mongols know nothing about feeding an empire, they were nomads who lived off the land and migrate to greener pastures when times were lean. It was Han farmers that grow the food necessary to feed the empire. Who builds the houses and towns in the Empire? The Mongols lived in temporary houses (i.e yurts) and know nothing about making permanent houses, it was Han builders and architectures that built the houses and planned the towns. Who ensures the day-to-day affairs of the Empire were kept running smoothly? The Mongols know nothing about bureaucracy, it was the Han bureaucrats that kept the empire running smoothly. All in all, the Yuan Dynasty is most definitely Han Chinese in nature. Even Kublai slept under a permanent roof in the Imperial Palace, while his grandfather Genghis purportedly never slept under a permanent roof his entire life. If anything, it's the Mongols that assimilated into Han China, not the other way round.
    1
  23000.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou No need for the CCP proganda on Taiwan. They are a succesful democracy with a vibrant economy." I pointed out that Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for half its life, during which they've experienced the most economic growth under the KMT. Even now, look at the mainland and China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    1
  23001.  @Andy-P  You said: "Mediacorp is a Singaporean public broadcast service - with obvious CCP connections. Selective Chinese commentators do not give the complete story." Do you have evidence that Mediacorp has connections to the Communist Party of China? Also, the statement I quoted was made by Ray Chou, a Research Fellow at Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica in Taiwan, so what has Mediacorp even got to do with what the research fellow said? You said: "Taiwan is a world leader in semi conductors." List of countries/regions by integrated circuit exports in 2019 1. Hong Kong, China ($134,483 million) 2. Mainland China ($102,187 million) 3. Taiwan, China ($100,408 million) 4. South Korea ($79,082 million) 5. Singapore ($76,868 million) 6. Malaysia ($44,794 million) 7. United States ($40,099 million) 8. Japan ($27,791 million) 9. Vietnam ($26,084 million) 10. Philippines (18,991 million) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by integrated circuit exports You said: "It's people are far wealthier than those of China." List of countries by number of billionaires as per Forbes (March 2022) 1. United States (735) 2. Mainland China (539) 3. India (166) 4. Germany (134) 5. Russia (83) 6. Hong Kong, China (67) 7. Canada (64) 8. Brazil (62) 9. Italy (52) 10. Taiwan, China (51) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by number of billionaires You said: "The CCP could get people to say the UK was better under authoritarian government (pax britanica) than the democracy it experinces today." A hypothetical scenario yes, but what has that got to do with the discussion?
    1
  23002.  @Andy-P  You said: "Mediacorp is a Singaporean public broadcast service - with obvious CCP connections. Selective Chinese commentators do not give the complete story." Do you have evidence that Mediacorp has connections to the Communist Party of China? Also, the statement I quoted was made by Ray Chou, a Research Fellow at Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica in Taiwan, so what has Mediacorp even got to do with what the research fellow said?
    1
  23003.  @Andy-P  You said: "Taiwan is a world leader in semi conductors." List of countries/regions by integrated circuit exports in 2019 1. Hong Kong, China ($134,483 million) 2. Mainland China ($102,187 million) 3. Taiwan, China ($100,408 million) 4. South Korea ($79,082 million) 5. Singapore ($76,868 million) 6. Malaysia ($44,794 million) 7. United States ($40,099 million) 8. Japan ($27,791 million) 9. Vietnam ($26,084 million) 10. Philippines (18,991 million) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by integrated circuit exports You said: "It's people are far wealthier than those of China." List of countries by number of billionaires as per Forbes (March 2022) 1. United States (735) 2. Mainland China (539) 3. India (166) 4. Germany (134) 5. Russia (83) 6. Hong Kong, China (67) 7. Canada (64) 8. Brazil (62) 9. Italy (52) 10. Taiwan, China (51) ... Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by number of billionaires You said: "The CCP could get people to say the UK was better under authoritarian government (pax britanica) than the democracy it experinces today." A hypothetical scenario yes, but what has that got to do with the discussion?
    1
  23004.  @ayushkarn5972  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled.
    1
  23005.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou what 5000 years. Your first written record was found was 1200 bc 3200 year old" The Xia Dynasty (c. 2070-1600 BCE) was the first government to emerge in ancient China. There are no written records, but archaeological evidence of a flood that occurred during the Xia Dynasty have been uncovered in 2016.
    1
  23006.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou even Greece and Rome is more a civilization than china which is still tribe till 800s bc" Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by the rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (fine china) which were in great demand throughout the ancient world. Take Han Chinese traditional clothing Hanfu (汉服) for example and it has 5,000 years of history and even the Japanese Kimono and Korean Hanbok clothing have their origins in Chinese Hanfu.
    1
  23007.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou Greece rome and india all are surviving civilization and far longer than china so called civilization which is actually a trive" Take ancient writing scripts for example and Chinese characters constitute the oldest continuously used system of writing in the world, having been used since 1200 BCE and today, Mandarin Chinese is the most spoken language in the world by number of speakers. Whereas other ancient scripts like Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia), Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered dead languages today, since they are no longer evolving with the times and no new words been added into their vocabularies. The Indus Valley Civilization forms much of modern day Pakistan (of which India has recognized as a separate country altogether) so if anything, the Indus Valley is part of Pakistan's history.
    1
  23008.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou there is no planned city and construction in china till 800 bc." Chinese cities have a wall (城墙) surrounding them ad archaeological excavations have uncovered the existence of these city walls. A walled city was uncovered in Liangzhu culture (良渚文化, 3300–2300 BC). Archaeological digs at Sanxingdui (三星堆) site, showed evidence of a walled city founded c. 1,600 BCE. The trapezoidal city has an east wall 2,000 m, south wall 2,000 m, west wall 1,600 m enclosing 3.6 square kilometers. The Longshan culture (龙山文化 3000 – c. 1900 BC also contained several walled cities. Source: Wikipedia: Chinese city wall wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_wall
    1
  23009.  @ayushkarn5972  Kashmir is claimed by Pakistan as well, since the region has a Muslim majority, and Pakistan military controls parts of Jammu & Kashmir.
    1
  23010.  @ayushkarn5972  Harappa and Mohenjo-daro were the two great cities of the Indus Valley Civilization, emerging around 2600 BCE along the Indus River Valley in the Sindh and Punjab provinces of Pakistan. Since India recognize Pakistan as its own separate country, then Indus Valley is Pakistan's history.
    1
  23011.  @ayushkarn5972  Greek language is spoken by Latin language is considered a dead language today, whereas Mandarin Chinese is the world's most spoken language by number of speakers Top 10 Languages By Total Number Of Speakers 1. Mandarin Chinese. 1.120 billion total speakers. 2. Hindi. 600 million total speakers. 3. Spanish. 543 million total speakers. 4. Standard Arabic. 274 million total speakers. 5. Bengali. 268 million total speakers. 6. French. 267 million total speakers. 7. Russian. 258 million total speakers.
    1
  23012.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou which mean china wall began in 800 bc with is 2800 years old not 4000 or 5000" Did anyone said anything about the Great Wall of China being 4000 or 5000 years old? But you did said: "There is no planned city and construction in china till 800 bc." and this has been proven wrong.
    1
  23013.  @ayushkarn5972  _"神州 Shenzhou tell me one planned city of china famous as mohenjodaro and egypt" Changan 长安 was the start of the Silk Road that brought Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, porcelain (aka fine china) to the West where it was in great demand by other countries. Yet you claim Chinese are uncivilized?
    1
  23014.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou flood doesnt tell xia dynasty was there. It was a mythical dynasty" Shang Dynasty (1600 to 1046 B.C) was originally considered a mythical dynasty too, until archaeological excavations proved it's existence. Likewise, there are always ongoing archaeological excavations that could some day prove the Xia Dynasty as not a myth, just like the archaeological study in 2016 that proved the existence of the flood at least.
    1
  23015.  @ayushkarn5972  Ancient Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought.
    1
  23016.  @ayushkarn5972  "州 Shenzhou changan city was of qin period of 200 bc. Not more than 800" But you asked: "神州 Shenzhou tell me one planned city of china famous as mohenjodaro and egypt" and you did not mentioned anything about the date. Why are you moving the goalpost after I've clearly scored a goal? Just like earlier you talked about the Great Wall of China not being 4000 or 5000 years old, well, nobody said the Great Wall of China is 4000 or 5000 years old so why are you moving the goalpost each time?
    1
  23017.  @ayushkarn5972  You said: "Give any planned city of china name which is older than 900 bc and planned like mesopotamia cities and indus valley" At the beginning of the 14th century BC, King Pangeng of the Shang Dynasty established his capital 2 km (1.2 mi) north of modern Anyang city on the banks of the Huan River. The city, known as Yin, (殷) was the first stable capital in Chinese history and from that point on the dynasty that founded it would also become known as the Yin Dynasty.
    1
  23018.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou ivc is indian history. How can i correct you." I simply Googled "Is Indus Valley Pakistan?" and the result is the Harappan civilization was located in the Indus River valley. Its two large cities, Harappa and Mohenjo-daro, were located in present-day Pakistan's Punjab and Sindh provinces, respectively.
    1
  23019.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou greek language is spoken by latin. Are you alive." Latin language is not spoken by Greeks today. Latin is considered a dead language because it's no longer "evolving" with the times, and no new words are being added to its dictionary.
    1
  23020.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou greek is still spoken and unchanged." The pronunciation of ancient Greek was very different from that of Modern Greek. Ancient Greek had long and short vowels; many diphthongs; double and single consonants; voiced, voiceless, and aspirated stops; and a pitch accent. In Modern Greek, all vowels and consonants are short. - Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Greek
    1
  23021.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou and hindi have now 850 million speaker according to new census change 600 to 850" Mandarin Chinese is still the world's most spoken language by number of speakers. Even outside of China, I'm sure everyone has heard of Chinatowns (唐人街) that can be found in virtually every major city in the world, where tourists can gather to sample Chinese cuisine and appreciate Chinese culture.
    1
  23022.  @ayushkarn5972  "Latin is spoken in small pockets of world it is not extinct" I never stated that Latin is extinct, however, it's acknowledged that Latin is a dead langauge and that no new Latin words are being created and added to its vocabulary in order to keep up with the times. Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia) and Egyptian Hieroglyphics are extinct languages.
    1
  23023.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou and I not on questioned chinese scientific achievement" Scientific achievement is part of a civilization's development. Farming and agriculture is part of a civilization, just like weaving clothing and constructing buildings. Like I pointed out, Chinese have been using silk for clothing since the 4000 BC if you look up the history of Silk.
    1
  23024.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou and vedic period began in india 2000 bce which is still older than china" There is currently no archaeological evidence for the existence of the Vedic Period of India, whereas there is archaeological evidence of a Xia Dynasty flood, that's only discovered recently since 2016. Scientists have found evidence of a catastrophic flood that overwhelmed the upper Yellow River valley in China some 4,000 years ago, an event that they say may confirm the historical basis of China’s semi-legendary first dynasty. Source: NYT (8/4/16) Scientific Evidence of Flood May Give Credence to Legend of China’s First Dynasty. But of course, archaeological studies are still ongoing and perhaps some day the myth might become accepted as real history by the rest of the world.
    1
  23025.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou search where is no of sites of indus valley located. It was india." I searched "Is Indus Valley Civilization Pakistan?" and its two large cities, Harappa and Mohenjo-daro, were located in present-day Pakistan's Punjab and Sindh provinces, respectively. This is where the bulk of Indus Valley Civilization is concentrated and it's part of modern day Pakistan today.
    1
  23026.  @ayushkarn5972  You said: "神州 Shenzhou yin capital is more like a village than a capital." You said: "Give any planned city of china name which is older than 900 bc and planned like mesopotamia cities and indus valley"" and that's exactly what I did, now you're moving goalposts again?
    1
  23027.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou it is not planned city like indus valley cities which is it is just a village" I've already given you the name of the planned city, yet you just dismiss it? And by Indus Valley cities, are you referring to arappa and Mohenjo-daro, were located in present-day Pakistan's Punjab and Sindh provinces?
    1
  23028. ​ @ayushkarn5972  "Two years of archaeological research at the Xinzhai Ruins of Xinmi City, in central China's Henan Province, has borne fruit. Scientists have basically confirmed this was a large city with three moats and grand buildings in the early part of the Xia Dynasty (c.2100 BC - c.1600 BC). It is the first time that a walled city dating from the Xia Dynasty has been found, providing new materials for research on the period." - Article: Xinzhai Ruins Confirmed as Xia Dynasty City
    1
  23029.  @ayushkarn5972  Taken from Source: ThoughtCo: The Walled Shang Dynasty Cities of Ancient China: The Capital Cities of the Historic Shang Emperors "Shang Dynasty cities were the first historically documented urban settlements in China. The Shang Dynasty [c 1700–1050 B.C.E.] was the first Chinese dynasty to leave written records, and the idea and function of cities took on an elevated importance. The written records, mostly in the form of oracle bones, record the actions of the last nine Shang kings and describe some of the cities. The first of these historically-recorded rulers was Wu Ding, the twenty-first king of the dynasty."
    1
  23030.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou all china achievements started in 500-400 bc" Take pottery for example. As of 2012, the earliest pottery found anywhere in the world, dating to 20,000 to 19,000 years before the present, was found at Xianrendong Cave (仙人洞) in the Jiangxi province of China. Other early pottery vessels include those excavated from the Yuchanyan Cave in southern China, dated from 16,000 BC.
    1
  23031.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou vedic period began in 2000 bc is proven" Could you show some proof?
    1
  23032.  @ayushkarn5972  "The site is one of the many sites seen along the channels of the seasonal Ghaggar river, thought by some to be the Rigvedic Saraswati river." I would say "thought by some" isn't exactly proof though.
    1
  23033.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou it was proven by famous historian michael witzel who linguistically proves rigveda was more than 4200 years old 2200 bc" Linguistically proves rigveda was more than 4200 years old, but it doesn't show that Bhirrana is the Rigvedic Saraswati, it's only thought of as such.
    1
  23034.  @ayushkarn5972  You said: " It was linguistic and archaeology evidence sanskrit is 2 millennia bc old" There is archaeological evidence of Chinese Oracle Bone script existing since 1200 BC, however there is no archaeological evidence of Vedic Sanskrit that can be used to verify its existence in 1500 BC. Oldest Sanskrit text is possible 400 BC - 200 BC old, and there are no surviving earlier texts.
    1
  23035.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou you called village a planned city doesn't make sense." The archaelogical site for Yin capital (殷墟) is is the site of one of the ancient and major historical capitals of China. and is now one of China's oldest and largest archeological sites, and was selected as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2006, how's that a village? I gave you numerous other examples, you just dismiss them that's all.
    1
  23036.  @ayushkarn5972  You said: "神州 Shenzhou tell me planned like bhirani site and rakhighari." I've already given several examples and answered your question many times, but you just keep on moving the goalpost or dismissing my claims. The Xinzhai ruins is an example of a wall-ed city dating from the Xia Dynasty (c.2100 BC - c.1600 BC). The city covered a total area of 1 million square meters, with three layers of defense works: the outer moat, city wall and inner moat. The central part was lined with large buildings. The east and north city walls were built against a natural gully using fill and rammed earth, while the river running outside the west wall was manmade. About 220 meters beyond the north city wall was a natural ditch. Enhanced by manpower, it became the outer moat, extending 1,500 meters from east to west. It was 6 to 14 meters wide and 3 to 4 meters deep. Only the west, north and east sides of the inner moat, which once encircled the city, still exist.
    1
  23037.  @ayushkarn5972  You said: "Same pottery like paintings present in bhimbetka rock in india which dates back 55000 years ago by tribesmen" Then where are the pottery fragments? The world's oldest pottery fragments were found in a south China cave have been confirmed to be 20,000 years old, making them the oldest known pottery in the world, archaeologists say.
    1
  23038.  @ayushkarn5972  Not just pottery, but the world's earliest evidence of alcoholic beverages were discovered in China since 7000–5600 BC. Examination and analysis of ancient pottery jars from the neolithic village of Jiahu in the Henan province of northern China revealed residue left behind by the alcoholic drinks they had once contained. According to a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, chemical analysis of the residue confirmed that a fermented drink made of grape and hawthorn fruit wine, honey mead and rice beer was being produced in 7000–5600 BC (McGovern et al., 2005; McGovern 2009).
    1
  23039.  @ayushkarn5972  Not just pottery, but the world's earliest evidence of alcoholic beverages were discovered in China since 7000–5600 BC. According to a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, chemical analysis of the residue of ancient pottery jars from the neolithic village of Jiahu in the Henan province of northern China confirmed that a fermented drink made of grape and hawthorn fruit wine, honey mead and rice beer was being produced in 7000–5600 BC (McGovern et al., 2005; McGovern 2009).
    1
  23040.  @ayushkarn5972  The evidence for the world's earliest alcoholic beverage was found in China dating back to 7000–5600 BC. According to a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, chemical analysis of the residue confirmed that a fermented drink made of grape and hawthorn fruit wine, honey mead and rice beer was being produced in 7000–5600 BC.
    1
  23041.  @ayushkarn5972  Ancient Chinese invented a method of construction known as "rammed earth" in the Yangshao and Longshan cultures in China, dating to 5000 BCE. By 2000 BCE, rammed-earth architectural techniques (夯土 Hāng tǔ) were commonly used for walls and foundations in China.
    1
  23042.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou I never said bhirrana rigveda it was believed by some historians" So we have admission from you that Bhirrana may not actually be Rigveda, it's merely believed to be so by some historians, and there is no archaeological evidence this is the case.
    1
  23043.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou off course it have i have given a study that show and confirm sanskrit was 2000 bc year old." Could you show me an actual "Vedic Sanskrit" artifact dating to 1500 BC? Because so far it's only based on linguistics, but there is no solid evidence (like say, the Chinese Oracle Bone Script dating back to 1200 BC, that have been uncovered during Shang Dynasty excavations).
    1
  23044.  @ayushkarn5972  You said: "And mittani table wrriten have sanskrit words" Yes, but while Mittani empire gives valuable clues about the type of Sanskrit spoken at that time: it was not archaic Rig Vedic Sanskrit. It was a more evolved recent language.
    1
  23045.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou I only said there was painting in that cave it was just a rebuutal if there was painting then there must be fragments also." So where are the pottery fragments? If not, then the oldest pottery fragments in the world were discovered in China like I said previously.
    1
  23046.  @ayushkarn5972  You said: "神州 Shenzhou those construction were just carving of land.which you called wall" Carvings of lands are still wall, are you just going to dismiss it again?
    1
  23047.  @ayushkarn5972  Apart from pottery fragments, the evidence for the world's oldest alcoholic drink was a mixed fermented drink of rice, honey, and hawthorn fruit and/or grape. The residues of the beverage, dated ca. 7000–6600 BCE, were recovered from early pottery from Jiahu, a Neolithic village in the Yellow River Valley.
    1
  23048.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou yinxu was unesco sites because oldestsurving oracle bone of 1200 bc was found there with many tombs whom you connect with planned coty" But it's still one of the largest archaelogical sites for UNESCO, then how is it just a village in your mind?
    1
  23049.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou my acceptance doesn't make cave carving structure a wall" So what is your definition of a wall?
    1
  23050.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou you can go and yourself research pottery painting in bhimbetka by radio carbon it was proven that painting was 55000 years old" I'm not doubting the carbon dating process of the painting, I'm asking where are the pottery fragments? Because the world's oldest pottery fragments are located in China, that's all I'm saying. Just like the world's oldest alcoholic drink is found in China.
    1
  23051.  @ayushkarn5972  You said: "神州 Shenzhou those mittani words were archaic sanskrit only." Which tablet are you referring to? The tablet containing a letter from Tushratta of Mitanni to Amenhotep III is actually written in Cuneiform not Sanskrit so what Vedic Sanskrit are you talking about?
    1
  23052.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou all words of sanskrit there was included in rigveda old. Sanskrit." Once again, where is the actual archeological evidence of Sanskrit that dates back to 1500 BC? Both of us have accepted that Shang Dynasty Oracle Bone Script dated back to 1200 BC (and we have the archeological evidence in Chinese museums) but thus far, there is no physical, archeological evidence for Sanskrit dating back to 1500 BC.
    1
  23053.  @ayushkarn5972  Did you know that Sanskrit was first spoken in Syria, not India?
    1
  23054.  @ayushkarn5972  Speaking of UNESCO World Heritage sites, China ranks world's second in the world in number of World Heritage sites at 56 sites, just behind Italy at number one with 58 sites. India has 40 sites and is ranked number 6th in the world. Countries by World Heritage Sites as of July 2021: 1. Italy (58 sites) 2. China (56 sites) 3. Germany (51 sites) 4. France (49 sites) 5. Spain (49 sites) 6. India (40 sites) 7. Mexico (35 sites) 8. United Kingdom (33 sites) 9. Russia (30 sites) 10. Iran (26 sites) ... Source: UNESCO World Heritage Sites
    1
  23055.  @ayushkarn5972  So Sanskrit isn't even originally an Indian language, it was introduced from foreign migrators like you said.
    1
  23056.  @ayushkarn5972  So both you and me agree that Shang Dynasty Oracle Bone Script have existed since 1200 BC and that there is actual archaeological evidence of this Chinese writing system. However, there is currently no archaeological evidence for (Vedic) Sankrit dating to 1500 BC.
    1
  23057.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou that pottery thing was debatable." At this current point in time, the oldest pottery fragments in the world are discovered in a south China cave have been confirmed to be 20,000 years old. Not only that, but the world's oldest alcoholic drink was discovered in China dating back to 7000 - 6000 BC.
    1
  23058.  @ayushkarn5972  "Also sarswati river dried up in nearly 2000 bc are archaeology evidence this was mentioned in rigveda how they migrate from sarswati river to ganges" But this is not archaeological proof of (Vedic) Sanskrit dating back to 1500 BC. However, both you and I agree that Shang Dynasty Oracle Bone Script were discovered in China dating back to 1200 BC and there's archaelogical proof of this.
    1
  23059.  @ayushkarn5972  "Rakhigarhi is the largest Harappan site in the Indian subcontinent." Actually its the Mohenjo-daro which is located in Pakistan.
    1
  23060.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou yin was still a place where there many tombs was there still not change in equation." And where do the people that were buried in this tombs come from if not from the surrounding region? They had the wealth to build tombs what makes you think China don't have cities? You said: "China have no planned city untill 800" I've already proven this statement wrong several times, not only with Yin but also Xinzhai (新砦) dating from about 1870 BC to 1720 BC during the Xia Dynasty. The city Xinzhai is believed to has been founded by king Qi of Xia, and was the capital of the Xia dynasty until Qi's descendant Shao Kang took control of the dynasty.
    1
  23061.  @ayushkarn5972  You said: "China have no planned city untill 800" Xiaoshuangqiao (小双桥;) is the site of a Bronze Age city dating to 1435 BC, located on the southern bank of the Suoxu River, 20 km northwest of Zhengzhou. At the centre of the site are rammed-earth foundations of palaces. To the north are sacrificial pits containing human remains. Further pits to the north and south contain the remains of sacrificial cattle. Many of the southern pits also contain remains of other animals, pottery, tools, ornaments and waste from bronze smelting. Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiaoshuangqiao
    1
  23062.  @ayushkarn5972  You said: "China have no planned city untill 800" Panlongcheng (盘龙城) or Panlong City is an archaeological site associated with the Erligang culture (c. 1500–1300 BCE) during the Shang dynasty period (c. 1600–1046 BCE). During the early Erligang period, the site suddenly grew rapidly, reaching an area of around 1 km2 (0.39 sq mi). The central town was 75,000 square metres (0.075 km2; 810,000 sq ft) surrounded by a hangtu, or rammed earth, wall. Inside the walls two palaces occupying 2 hectares (20,000 m2) were discovered. Panlongcheng may have been an Erligang outpost used to control regional resources, such as copper mines. Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Panlongcheng
    1
  23063.  @ayushkarn5972  I literally gave you examples of planned Chinese cities (I even gave you the actual dimension of their city walls) before 800 BC, yet you just dismiss them as "burial sites" when they are actually "archaeological dig sites". Then you're just refusing the acknowledge the evidence before your eyes that's all.
    1
  23064.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou fact is there is there is no planned city in china." I've already given you several examples of planned cities in China before 800 BC, I even gave you the dimensions of how big the cities were, but you just close your eyes and remain blind to the archaeological evidence.
    1
  23065.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou bow many times i have to said you indus valley is india civilization those people mix with aryans to form ancestoral north indian population there was genetic evidence shows the mixing of aryans with ivc people starts from 2000 bce" But again, there is no archaeological evidence of Vedic Sanskrit existing since 1500 BC, whereas both you and I agree that there is archaeological evidence of Shang Dynasty Oracle Bone scripts existing since 1200 BC.
    1
  23066.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou mixing in india starts from 2000bce this was fact. So vedic period starts in 2000 bce." The Vedic period may have existed in 2000 BC, but once again, there is no archaeological evidence of Vedic Sanskrit being written on 1500 BC. Where is the archaeological evidence? Whereas Shang Dynasty Oracle Bone Script have been found dating back to 1200 BC.
    1
  23067.  @ayushkarn5972  You said: "神州 Shenzhou and now there is no reason for debating. So thanks and bye" Because you refuse to look at actual, archaeological evidence, instead you look at linguistics and genetic studies, but it doesn't constitute as hard evidence that (Vedic) Sankrit was written in 1500 BC, whereas in 1200 BC we have archaeological evidence of Shang Dynasty Oracle Bone Script.
    1
  23068.  @ayushkarn5972  Even in pottery, I've shown the world's oldest pottery fragments were found in China that are from 20,000 years ago. The world's oldest alcoholic drink was found in China dating to 7000 BCE. Even the agricultural crop rice was grown in China at least 9,400 years ago.
    1
  23069.  @ayushkarn5972  "神州 Shenzhou even mongol have tombs that doesn't made them build planned city likewise china also not have planned city untill 800bce" I literally gave you the physical dimension of the cities walls, but instead of accepting the truth, you just close your eyes to the evidence and cling to statements that I've long debunked.
    1
  23070.  @ayushkarn5972  China can list the Names of all 750+ rulers of China and the period of Chinese history in which they reigned. Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors (三皇五帝) (2852–2070 BC) 3162–2962 BC Yǒucháo 有巢 2962–2852 BC Suìrén 燧人 2852–2737 BC Fúxī 伏羲 2737–2698 BC Yándì 炎帝 2698–2598 BC Huángdì 黃帝 2597–2514 BC Shǎohào 少昊 2514–2436 BC Zhuānxū 顓頊 2436–2366 BC Dìkù 帝嚳 2366–2358 BC Dìzhì 帝摯 2356–2255 BC Dìyáo or Táng Yáo 帝堯/ 唐堯 2255–2208 BC Dìshùn or Yú Shùn Xia dynasty (夏朝) (2070–1600 BC) 2150–2106 BC Yǔ 禹 2106–2077 BC Qǐ 啟 2077–2048 BC Kāng 康 2048–2036 BC Kāng 康 2036–2008 BC Xiāng 相 Interregnum (about 40 years) 1968–1946 BC Kāng 康 1946–1929 BC Zhù 杼 1929–1885 BC Huái 槐 1885–1867 BC Máng 芒 1867–1851 BC Xiè 泄 1851–1792 BC Jiàng 降 1792–1771 BC Jiōng 扃 1771–1750 BC Jǐn 廑 1750–1719 BC Kǒng Jiǎ 孔甲 1719–1708 BC Gāo 阜 1708–1689 BC Fā 發 1689–1658 BC Jié 桀 ... Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_monarchs
    1
  23071.  @ayushkarn5972  Continued from List of Chinese monarchs source:wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_monarchs Shang dynasty (商朝) (1600–1046 BC) 1658–1629 BC Zi Lü 子履 1629–1627 BC Zi Shèng 子勝 1627–1623 BC Zi Yōng 子庸 1623–1611 BC Zi Zhì 子至 1592–1567 BC Zi Biàn 子辯 1567–1550 BC Zi Gāo 子高 1550–1538 BC Zi Zhòu 子伷 1538–1463 BC Zi Mì 子密 1463–1452 BC Zi Zhuāng 子莊 1452–1437 BC Zi Fā 子發 1437–1428 BC Zi Zhěng 子整 1428–1409 BC Zi Téng 子滕 1409–1393 BC Zi Dàn 子旦 1393–1368 BC Zi Yú 子踰 1368–1336 BC Zi Xīn 子新 1336–1307 BC Zi Gēng 子更 1307–1290 BC Zi Hé 子和 1290–1262 BC Zi Xún 子旬 1262–1259 BC Zi Sòng 子颂 1259–1250 BC Zi Liǎn 子敛 1250–1192 BC Zi Zhāo 子昭 1192–1185 BC Zi Yuè 子躍 1185–1158 BC Zi Zài 子載 1158–1152 BC Zi Xiān 子先 1152–1147 BC Zi Xiāo 子囂 1147–1112 BC Zi Qú 子瞿 1112–1102 BC ZZi Tuō 子托 1101–1076 BC Zi Xiàn 子羡 1075–1046 BC Zi Shòu 子受 There are still many more leaders names for Zhou dynasty (周朝) (1046–256 BC) Qin dynasty (秦朝) (221–207 BC) Han dynasty (漢朝) (202 BC–9 AD, 25–220 AD) Three Kingdoms (三國) (220–280 AD) ... and so on. China's 5000 years of continuous history is arguably the most intact out of any other country's history in the world.
    1
  23072.  @ayushkarn5972  ... (Continued) Shang dynasty (商朝) (1600–1046 BC) 1658–1629 BC Zi Lü 子履 1629–1627 BC Zi Shèng 子勝 1627–1623 BC Zi Yōng 子庸 1623–1611 BC Zi Zhì 子至 1592–1567 BC Zi Biàn 子辯 1567–1550 BC Zi Gāo 子高 1550–1538 BC Zi Zhòu 子伷 1538–1463 BC Zi Mì 子密 1463–1452 BC Zi Zhuāng 子莊 1452–1437 BC Zi Fā 子發 1437–1428 BC Zi Zhěng 子整 1428–1409 BC Zi Téng 子滕 1409–1393 BC Zi Dàn 子旦 1393–1368 BC Zi Yú 子踰 1368–1336 BC Zi Xīn 子新 1336–1307 BC Zi Gēng 子更 1307–1290 BC Zi Hé 子和 1290–1262 BC Zi Xún 子旬 1262–1259 BC Zi Sòng 子颂 1259–1250 BC Zi Liǎn 子敛 1250–1192 BC Zi Zhāo 子昭 1192–1185 BC Zi Yuè 子躍 1185–1158 BC Zi Zài 子載 1158–1152 BC Zi Xiān 子先 1152–1147 BC Zi Xiāo 子囂 1147–1112 BC Zi Qú 子瞿 1112–1102 BC ZZi Tuō 子托 1101–1076 BC Zi Xiàn 子羡 1075–1046 BC Zi Shòu 子受 There are still many more leaders names for Zhou dynasty (周朝) (1046–256 BC) Qin dynasty (秦朝) (221–207 BC) Han dynasty (漢朝) (202 BC–9 AD, 25–220 AD) Three Kingdoms (三國) (220–280 AD) ... and so on. China's 5000 years of continuous history is arguably the most intact out of any other country's history in the world.
    1
  23073.  @michaelmoore1637  About authoritarianism, China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  23074.  @michaelmoore1637  Shanghai is literally taking steps to reopen slowly after a successful lockdown. Also, China is growing stronger under the Communist Party of China, then can't the CPC be allowed to continue leading China to success? Also those 14 "demands" were actually 14 "grievances" that could act as a starting point for negotiations between Beijing and Canberra to resolve issues between our countries. You said: "It’s another to expect the west to adopt those methods." As far as I know, President Xi has publicly stated that China's system is not for export. China has not forced our governing system onto other countries, unlike say the United States forcing democracy onto other countries. “We will not import other countries’ models, and will not export the China model,” President Xi Jinping told a forum for foreign political group. “We will provide more opportunities for the world through our development,” he said.
    1
  23075.  @alfiey5783  Most Americans aren't interested in sacrificing American lives for Taiwan. Polls show only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan. Source: Polls show only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/2156237/what-would-us-do-if-beijing-decided-take-taiwan-force
    1
  23076.  @georgelabe-assimo4365  "China doesn't have the equipment or infrastructure to even mount a successful landing on the island even after bombarding it with missiles." China has amphibious assault vehicles like the ZTD-05 (VN18) said to be world's fastest amphibious assault vehicle, able to attain sailing speeds of up to 30kmph, which is the fastest of it's kind. Video: Chinese firm built 'fastest' amphibious assault vehicle youtu.be/4rzoWPWbai8 The tracks and wheel can withdraw into the body to reduce water traction and it's max ground speed is 65kmph, with a cannon, a machine gun and 14 people on board. It's engine can produce 1600 horsepower, a figure normally associated with heavy tanks.
    1
  23077.  @alfiey5783  China has 5th generation stealth fighter, the Chengdu J-20, and out of the entire world, only 3 countries have successfully flown full-size stealth combat aircraft demonstrations and they are the United States (in 1977), Russia (in 2010) and China (in 2011). As of January 2020, only two countries in the world, USA and China, have combat-ready stealth aircraft in service. Source: Stealth Aircraft wikipedia.org/wiki/Stealth_aircraft#Manned
    1
  23078.  @alfiey5783  China has inducted the world's first operational anti-ship ballistic missile, a "carrier killer" capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, known as the DF-21D. Video: China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile youtu.be/p-cEunmqXM8 The DF-21D is capable of targeting aircraft carrier strike groups out in the open ocean, from the safety of the land. The DF-21D is launched from land-based mobile launchers and flies high up into the stratosphere, using its advanced maneuverability to avoid interception by anti-missile defenses below, before falling at hypersonic speeds (above Mach 20) The warhead is even capable of terminal guidance, making last minute adjustments to its trajectory just seconds before impact. Source: Anti-ship ballistic missiles wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-ship_ballistic_missile#China
    1
  23079.  @alfiey5783  When facing off against stealth fighters, China's special YLC-8B radar integrates the traditional detection method of mechanical scanning with advanced phased array technology, and is best known for being able to detect stealth aircraft. Video: China unveils anti stealth radar on World Radar Expo youtu.be/LzRMWRy3AnE Fourth-generation air surveillance radars can be rapidly deployed, and are powerful enough to detect some low-orbiting satellites.
    1
  23080.  @alfiey5783  China is home to the world's longest range ICBM, the DF-41 with operational range between 12,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the US LGM-30 Minuteman range of 13,000 km. Video: China missile test DF-41 launch from railroad train youtu.be/h2kjMctT8yU
    1
  23081.  @alfiey5783  Take tanks for example and China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank has commanded healthy respect from international observers, as its performance parameters are equal to many top Western designs (like the Russian T-90 and the US M1 Abrams), and the Type 99 also packs a few unique tricks of its own. Source: China's Deadly Type 99 Tank vs. Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/chinas-deadly-type-99-tank-vs-russias-t-90-americas-m-1-17836 China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank was even featured in our 70th anniversary National Day parade. Video: China's new generation main battlefield tanks revealed in National Day Parade youtu.be/Ec4Bu2orKTk
    1
  23082.  @alfiey5783  China has hypersonic missiles like the DF-ZF, which have been tested 7 times already and travels at speeds between 4,000 and 7,000 miles per hour. Source: China Successfully Tests Hypersonic Missile freebeacon.com/national-security/china-successfully-tests-hypersonic-missile/ U.S. intelligence officials have assessed that China plans to use the glider to deliver nuclear weapons through increasingly sophisticated missile defenses. The DF-ZF also could be used as part of a conventional strategic strike weapon capable of hitting targets around the world within an hour.
    1
  23083.  @alfiey5783  Besides tanks, take artillery for example and China's self-propelled howitzer, PLZ-05 (PLZ-52) is ranked Top 5 Self-propelled Howitzers in the world. Video: Top 10 Self Propelled Howitzers in the World 2017-2020 youtu.be/AQBcIRwg2fg?t=425
    1
  23084.  @alfiey5783  Space travel? China's missile technology have even demonstrated the capability to take out a satellite in orbit. On January 11, 2007, China took out a faulty weather satellite at an altitude of 865 kilometres (537 mi), with a mass of 750 kg using missile traveling with a speed of 8 km/s in the opposite direction, launched with a multistage solid-fuel missile from Xichang Satellite Launch Center or nearby. Source: 2007 Chinese anti-satellite missile test wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Chinese_anti-satellite_missile_test
    1
  23085.  @alfiey5783  China has successfully tested a cutting-edge hypersonic aircraft, Xingkong-2 (星空-2) or Starry Sky-2. Video: Military News: China tests hypersonic aircraft Starry Sky-2 youtu.be/aVWQ2uOCepU Starry Sky-2 was launched using a rocket and the aircraft rides shockwaves generated by its hypersonic flight and the test craft maintained speeds above Mach 5.5 for more than 400 seconds, reaching a top speed of 7,344 kmph. Experts say that the aircraft's speed and unpredictable trajectory will challenge modern missile defense systems.
    1
  23086.  @alfiey5783  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  23087.  @alfiey5783  Besides tanks and howitzers, the People's Liberation Army also has Multi Launch Rocket Systems (MLRS) like the SR-5, the AR3 and the WS-2D, which rank among the Top 10 MLRSs in the world, according to the following video. Video: Top 10 Multiple Launch Rocket Systems (MLRS) in the World youtu.be/66ETMGNrh98?t=756
    1
  23088.  @John77Doe  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    1
  23089. @mav "you are not Chinese , so have no right to speak to or for them.. get my drift ?" Well, if you're not from Taiwan, then you certainly have not right to speak on behalf of Taiwan too, isn't it?
    1
  23090. @clintpot First you claimed it was pollution laws that's affecting Chinese health, now you're claiming it's big pharma? The fact remains that Chinese enjoy a longer life expectancy than Americans? Also, Chinese pharmaceutical companies follow the old method regarding vaccines for corona, and Sinovac didn't follow the mRNA method by western companies. As for the One Child Policy, it was a necessary policy at that time. Back then, China suffered from overpopulation problems like high infant mortality, high child malnutrition, high illiteracy. Poor families had multiple mouths to feed, and couldn't afford to send ever kid to school, or even to the doctor's when they were sick. Why not pool the poor families limited resources into raising a single healthy kid and send him to school? That's what China did through the One Child Policy. Look at India, they have a similar population size but did not have any population control measures and today they have population problems like infant mortality, child malnutrition and illiteracy.
    1
  23091.  @clintpot8521  First you claimed it was pollution laws that's affecting Chinese health, now you're claiming it's big pharma? The fact remains that Chinese enjoy a longer life expectancy than Americans? Also, Chinese pharmaceutical companies follow the old method regarding vaccines for corona, and Sinovac didn't follow the mRNA method by western companies. As for the One Child Policy, it was a necessary policy at that time. Back then, China suffered from overpopulation problems like high infant mortality, high child malnutrition, high illiteracy. Poor families had multiple mouths to feed, and couldn't afford to send ever kid to school, or even to the doctor's when they were sick. Why not pool the poor families limited resources into raising a single healthy kid and send him to school? That's what China did through the One Child Policy. Look at India, they have a similar population size but did not have any population control measures and today they have population problems like infant mortality, child malnutrition and illiteracy.
    1
  23092. China can feed 20% of the world's population with only 10% of the world's arable land.
    1
  23093. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  23094. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  23095. Japan is the U.S's lap dog.
    1
  23096. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  23097. Singapore is the only ASEAN country to have applied sanctions onto Russia, earning the country a place on Russia's list of "unfriendly countries".
    1
  23098. If you're the owner of a small business, the government will reduce your taxes and ensure your profits are maximised. The government will also actively help you resume production and recover to levels before the outbreak as soon as possible. Video: Facts tell: Hubei's three steps to recover from Covid-19 youtu.be/s80M55LUfLw?t=100
    1
  23099. Amnesty International has been ignoring Ukraine shelling Donetsk and Luhansk, killing 14,000 civilians over the course of 8 years, since the 2014 coup in Ukraine ousting President Yanukovych by USA and NATO to install their own regime in Ukraine.
    1
  23100. It seems that no matter what China does, the West is still going to claim that it's wrong regardless. Whether it's the Wuhan lockdown or Shanghai lockdown, Western MSM is going to portray it in a negative light to it's audiences.
    1
  23101.  @MarkYeung1  A survey in Russia by Levada Center has revealed that around 83% of Russians surveyed actually support Putin's actions as the President of the Russian Federation. So it appears Russia is "democratic" in that the government is doing what the majority of the ordinary Russians want.
    1
  23102. +Robert Hardy According to the following source, US president Donald Trump honors the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China Source: White House confirms Trump's agreement to honor 'One China' policy cnbc.com/2017/02/09/white-house-confirms-trumps-agreement-to-honor-one-china-policy.html
    1
  23103. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    1
  23104.  @rexwu7849  I think what Herman Chow means is that mansana should seek "attention" elsewhere.
    1
  23105.  Charles Schmid  China's supercomputer Tianhe-1 (天河-1) found that the lungs of a young American vaper hospitalized for "mysterious pneumonia" last summer could be exhibiting Covid-19 symptoms. scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3079046/chinese-supercomputer-and-american-doctors-clash-over-ai
    1
  23106.  @HeresMyView  "神州 Shenzhou , actually the roles are now reverse." Hoe are they reversed? Most important point is that in China, the Chinese government is above the corporations. Whereas in USA, the U.S corporations are above the government.
    1
  23107.  @HeresMyView  "神州 Shenzhou , when I said roles are reversed, it means that corporations are treated like humans." That long paragraph doesn't exactly explain how the roles are reversed. In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, whereas in USA, the U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit, waging wars in the Middle East to control the oil, for example. How have the roles somehow been reversed? Does the US government suddenly control the corporations?
    1
  23108. Through this process, the government is actually reviving the "Mandate of Heaven" used by Chinese dynasties in the past, where a competent ruler is allowed to remain in power to maximise the benefits to China during his reign. An incompetent ruler will eventually be ousted by a peasant rebellion, as if by Heaven's will. This "Mandate of Heaven" may seem outdated at a glance, but it has successfully guided Imperial China throughout 4000-5000 years of history, so there is bound to be merits to pursuing this form of governance in China again.
    1
  23109. gt hya This "Mandate of Heaven" has served China for 5000 years, making China one of the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Rome and Egypt have since faded to history. What makes you think that the Imperial System is unsuccessful, when it has survived for so long, where other forms of government didn't?
    1
  23110.  @marvelcomiks8078  Well said. Singapore is the only South East Asian country to have slapped sanctions on Russia, thus earning Singapore a place on Russia's list of "unfriendly countries". There was no bad blood earlier between Singapore and Russia, now it exists as a result of Singapore's actions, so it appeared like Singapore is playing right into the U.S hands.
    1
  23111. +Juju Rellama Chinese workers manufacture cheap goods like smartphones, computers, appliances, sneakers, toys and clothing so that inflation in other countries is kept to a minimum, and the cost of living in other countries is lower than it should be. Think of the millions of dollars people in other countries have saved on living expenses over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Chinese tourists come to your countries and spend our coin in your country, providing a source of income for your people. Money is flowing out of our country and into Australia this way, when Chinese people buy property in Australia.
    1
  23112. From what I studied, Malaysia did not abandon Singapore, it's because Lee Kuan Yew kept insisting on doing things his way and stirring up trouble with Malaysian PM, that's why Malaysia had to let go of Singapore.
    1
  23113.  @DrakeLimOfficial  Malaya was initially reluctant to merge with Singapore given her huge Chinese population, but did so to stop Singapore from falling under the control of, say Indonesia. And in terms of hard handedness, Malaya simply didn't wanted Singaporean influencing Malay politics is all, yet Lee Kuan Yew kept interfering in it.
    1
  23114.  @DrakeLimOfficial  Lee Kuan Yew was actually anti-communist, and he jailed or exiled dissidents whom he considered as socialist/communist. Although he was anti-colonialist, he was willing to form a united front with the British against communism when it suited his interests, and would later shift his public stance when the need arose. Today, Singapore is host to some US military naval bases, and the US aircraft carriers and warships start their intrusions into the South China Sea Islands using Singapore as an origin.
    1
  23115.  @DrakeLimOfficial  I have been to Singapore before and whenever I spoke Mandarin, some Singaporeans detected the mainland accent in my speech and started treating me coldly. But when I open my mouth and speak English, many Singaporeans started warming up. This anti-China attitude is still quite prevalent among some Singaporeans, even though the ancestors of Chinese Singaporeans came from the mainland and settled in Singapore long ago, yet some still harbour suspicion towards Chinese mainlanders, even today.
    1
  23116.  @DrakeLimOfficial  Singapore was a British colony in the past, its people should understand what it's like to be colonised, to be treated as "2nd class citizens" in your own lands, and to continually worship Westerners. Yet after Singapore gained independence, many still worship their Western imperialists and believe what Western media says. Singapore is also a country of immigrants from China, India, Europe (except the Malays who are native) you certainly have the power to control who comes to your shores. Yet immigrant workers dormitories are (from what I heard) terrible and that's where Covid-19 spread throughout worker dormitories because of cramped conditions. The older folk in Singapore tend to be anti-China? But some of the older folk themselves literally migrated to Singapore from the mainland, yet why do they harbour such negative feelings towards their homeland?
    1
  23117.  @DrakeLimOfficial  If Chinese mainlanders were uncouth, Singaporean tourists were at one time infamous for bad behaviour themselves, such as littering, spitting in public, jumping queues, hoarding food at buffets, stealing hotel soap, shampoo, bedsheets, etc. Such behaviour is expected as a developing country starts becoming more developed. About cheap labour, Singaporean wages increased, that's why foreign workers were called into do work that many Singaporeans themselves find unattractive, such as construction work, menial labour, driving taxis, buses, trains. It's actually thanks to these immigrant workers who keep Singapore's development and day-to-day activities running and affordable. Who's going to drive your buses and public transport if Singaporeans themselves don't want such jobs or demand a higher pay (translating into increased bus fares for commuters) Singaporeans should be thanking foreign workers for keeping transport fares down, yet they house workers in cramped dormitories (leading to spread of Covid-19)? Similar to Singapore, Hong Kong was also a British colony, yet after the 1997 handover back to mainland China, some Hong Kongers still retain the "colonized" mindset, worshipping their previous colonial masters especially during the HK riots where the United States Flag 🇺🇸 and United Kingdom Flag 🇬🇧 could be seen waving among the crowds. I just find it strange that Singapore is historically a country of immigrants themselves, yet houses immigrants in cramped worker dormitories and thinks that they are stealing jobs (when in reality, Singaporean wages have risen and many aren't willing to do the jobs that foreign workers are willing to do) and that Singapore tourists too, had their historical phase of uncouth behaviour. Singaporeans even have a coined a name for this sort of unsightly Singaporean behaviour themselves.
    1
  23118.  @DrakeLimOfficial  If you can bring up Chinese mainlanders being uncouth 2-3 decades ago, then similarly, can't I bring up examples of the same for Singaporean behaviour in the past? In the past many Singaporeans used to litter, spit in public, cut queues, hoarding food at buffets, stealing hotel soap, shampoo, especially peeing in lifts was a problem in the past, until Singapore government had to impose fines on littering, spitting in public, etc. There was even a Courtesy Campaign in Singapore to improve the behaviour of Singaporeans. I don't get upset when you talk about unruly mainland Chinese behavior in the past, yet why do you get so upset over me talking about unsightly Singaporean behaviour in the past? You can talk about bad Chinese behaviours in the past, can't I do the same for Singaporeans? Like I said, such behaviour is to be expected as a developing country starts becoming more developed. What are some examples of foreigners taking up high positions in Singapore? If the HR department of that company you worked for decides to delete/erase Singaporean resumes, that's terrible and you should be blaming the company itself, not the foreign workers/talent who were hired in the first place. Why the anti-foreigner sentiment when it was those companies that discriminated during hiring? Menial labour like construction workers, hawkers, food vendors, or service jobs like bus drivers, train operators, waiters, etc aren't jobs that most Singaporeans want to do, (or their wages are higher than foreign workers) The fact that foreign workers are housed in cramp worker dormitories clearly doesn't show Singaporeans appreciation of foreign workers. Do you ever see Singaporeans by themselves (not from a social organisation) going out of their way to offer appreciation to construction workers? Like say the average Singapore student or office worker showing appreciation to construction workers? …… You asked "What's the point of airing other people's dirty laundering when you are not that holy yourself?" Excuse me, you're the one who first brought up Chinese mainlanders unruly behavior in the past, but when I bring up Singaporeans unsightly behaviour in the past, you're accusing me of airing dirty laundry? I even stated that that's part of a phase that developing countries go through to become more developed.
    1
  23119.  @mrjingles821  China is currently at peace and "not at war" with any other country, which country is China currently at war with, you tell me?
    1
  23120.  @mrjingles821  Why is China a problem just for being at peace and instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, etc in other countries?
    1
  23121.  @DrakeLimOfficial  You said Singaporeans were anti-Chinese because of "uncouth" behaviour in the past, but I pointed out that Singaporeans had ugly behaviour of their own in the past as well, yet you're accusing me airing dirty laundry when you're the one doing it? Yes, I said Lee Kuan Yew was anti-Communist, that's a fact, and that Singapore's policies (such as hosting US military bases) are what's allowing USA to send warships and aircraft carriers to the South China Sea. These are facts, not mudslinging or airing dirty laundry. I've been in Singapore long enough to understand the anti-China sentiment there. Here's video of Singaporean scolding a Chinese national just for speaking Mandarin in Singapore. youtu.be/ygm-SoTU6aQ I'm not using outdated views, the coronavirus has revealed the poor living conditions of the worker dormitories in Singapore. I mean, you really think that the average Singaporean appreciates what foreign workers do for them? You said there are a lot of foreign talent taking up high positions, then why can't you name an example? I'm focusing on actual issues, yet why are you deliberately attacking me personally instead of attacking my points? I'm not the least bit upset about uncouth Chinese behaviour in the past, I just pointed out Singaporeans had the same problem in the past as well, and their government implemented "Courtesy Campaign" to improve Singaporean behaviour.
    1
  23122.  @DrakeLimOfficial   How am I mudslinging or airing dirty laundry? I'm not the least bit upset about uncouth mainland Chinese behaviour in the past, I just pointed out that the same thing happened in Singapore in the past, how's that mudslinging or airing dirty laundry? Also, I have never once said that China's system is better than Singapore's. I recognise that mainland Chinese had uncouth behaviour in the past, but I find it strange that you seem so reluctant to admit Singaporean bad behaviour (you even have a name for it, but YouTube censors it when I use it) in the past. Throughout this comment thread, I've been focusing on Singapore's history as a country of immigrants, yet developing anti-foreign sentiments, how some worker dormitories are in poor condition, and how Singaporean wages have increased and some didn't want to work certain laborious/service jobs. I've been focusing on actual issues, but it appears that you seem more interested in attacking me personally instead of attacking my points. If you claim Chinese can't handle criticism ourselves, then can the same be said of Singaporeans?
    1
  23123. Unless your business happens to be part of the Military-Industrial Complex, in which case, war is your business.
    1
  23124.  @yzy8638  Trade war yes, but not an actual military war. Furthermore, Joe Biden didn't reverse any of Trump's tariffs after he came into power.
    1
  23125.  @hyc1266  Anti-Asian racism in Western countries (whether in Canada, Australia, United Kingdom, etc) was already brewing whether or not Trump is in power. Trump was more of the symptom, not the cause. But in foreign policy, Trump didn't care about China's internal issues in Hong Kong and Xinjiang, he was more interested in securing his economic deal with China at that time. Whereas the Biden administration isn't really doing much to assuage the Anti-Asian racism, furthermore, he's deliberately using Taiwan island to stoke U.S-China tensions. Even though Biden and Xi have had meetings in which Biden acknowledges Taiwan is part of China, his actions appear to be the opposite of what his words claim.
    1
  23126. Chinese nationals also comprise 16% of all graduate STEMS in the USA.
    1
  23127.  @zackk4393  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"? Video: Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' youtu.be/DPt-zXn05ac
    1
  23128.  @jamesgathings6364  China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/b8cCsUBYSkw This makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity, some 856.4 billion kilowatt hours a year – more than double the amount produced by Brazil, in second place. The top three is completed by Canada, which produces 376.7 billion kilowatt hours a year. Source: China produces the most electricity from hydroelectric power weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/
    1
  23129.  @jamesgathings6364  Besides dominating hydroelectricity, China also dominates solar power, and the current largest photovoltaic power station in the world is the 850 MW Longyangxia Dam Solar Park in China. The largest floating solar farm in the world is located in Huainan City in Anhui province, Eastern China. Video: World's largest floating solar farm in E China youtu.be/qKpYH5SYUeo
    1
  23130.  @jamesgathings6364  China's first 100-Megawatt solar power plant was put into operation in NW China's Gansu Province. The molten-salt solar thermal power plant covers 7.8 square kilometres and has a 260-meter-high heat-absorbing tower. Using 12,000 large-sized reflection mirrors the power plant is capable of generating power all day long. Video: China's first 100MW solar power plant goes into operation youtu.be/Uo8FH9huaP4 Video: China's first 100MW Solar Power plant put into operation youtu.be/u7uhjd6B75Y Thousands of movable mirrors were used to form celebratory messages for the PRC's 70th founding anniversary. The 100MW solar power station is one of China's first photovoltaic power generating demonstrations. It's also the world's largest power station of its kind. Video: China's first 100MW solar power plant celebrates PRC's 70th anniversary youtu.be/OTr6vbtUkaQ Phrases to celebrate the New Year were written with solar panels at China's first 100-Megawatt solar powered plant. Happy New Year (元旦快乐) Greetings to you, 2019 (你好2019) Video: China uses solar panels to send the 'shiniest' New Year's greetings youtu.be/Zb1CkuCiDKc
    1
  23131. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiment in the West today against Russia and China. But it's having the effect of pushing both our countries closer together than we've ever been.
    1
  23132. Red Scare is fueling anti-Russian sentiment, while the Yellow Peril is fueling anti-Chinese sentiment in the West. But it's having the effect of pushing Russia and China closer together than we've ever been.
    1
  23133.  @jeffluo9591  Western MSM cherry-picked out a couple of lines (taken out of context) from what President Xi's and PM Modi's said to Putin, and frame it such to give off an impression that there is distrust between China and Russia, and India and Russia.
    1
  23134. Although NASA is forbidden by US government from working with CNSA (Chinese NASA), maybe China will let NASA look at our moon soil samples for study purposes.
    1
  23135. So do you have evidence that Peng Shuai did not have the power to say no? I read Peng Shuai's post (you can find the translated version on Reddit) and while she previously had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several decades, there is no allegation of sexual assault in her post. On 17 November, Peng Shuai even wrote an email to WTA claiming that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    1
  23136.  @tsunamis82  Sorry, I meant spanning several years. I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and she had previously known Zhang Gaoli seven years ago and it turns out that she consented to sex. Peng Shuai wrote: "You said in those seven years, you never forgot about me, and you will treat me well etc... I was terrified and anxious. Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well." So according to Peng Shuai's post, she had known Zhang Gaoli at least a decade earlier, and the sex was consensual. That's why Peng Shuai is denying the allegations of sexual assault, she even wrote an email to WTA saying that the allegations of sexual assault were not true and she critized the WTA for releasing unverified information without her consent.
    1
  23137.  @zackk4969  Why don't you quote the former Director of the CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo saying "We lied, We cheated, We stole..."?
    1
  23138.  @zackk4969  If that was really the case, then why is China the country with the world's largest population today at 1.4 billion people, if there really was this culture of "eating baby"? And who is this renowned Chinese writer?
    1
  23139.  @zackk4969  You can't refute my points so you just resort to verbal insults against me for my views? Why not attempt to attack my points instead of attacking me personally?
    1
  23140.  @zackk4969  It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set and many economists firmly believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's someday in the foreseeable future. But it's the combination of the "Red Scare" (fear of communism) and the "Yellow Peril" (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today.
    1
  23141.  @capnkirk5528  China knows that if Russia fall, then the west will come for China next. You think us fools? The US can only dream of separating China and Russia.
    1
  23142.  @capnkirk5528  You think Chinese are fools? China knows that if Russia's gone, the West will next have China in their sights. The US can only dream about separating China and Russia
    1
  23143.  @capnkirk5528  China knows that if Russia is no more, then the west will come after China next. Why should China stop supporting Russia?
    1
  23144. A recent survey for kids showed: Most popular Chinese kids' dream: Astronaut Most popular American kids' dream: YouTuber
    1
  23145.  @manu3939393  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  23146. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  23147. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  23148. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  23149. 觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  23150. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  23151. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  23152. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  23153. Even the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23154.  @kjetilhvalstrand1009  We will see indeed. In fact, Putin has recently announced his candidacy for the 2024 Presidential election in Russia.
    1
  23155.  @DIMA-q2o  Russia does conduct elections so doesn't that make it democracy? Even President Putin's position is not guaranteed and he's announcing his candidacy in the next Russian election in 2024 for another presidential term.
    1
  23156.  @hammer3721  There will be another candidate in the Russian election apart from Putin. Meanwhile, the Biden administration is finding ways to indict the opposing candidate after he announced his candidacy in the 2024 US election.
    1
  23157.  @hammer3721  In November 2023, former member of the State Duma Boris Nadezhdin became the first person backed by a registered political party to announce his candidacy, running on an anti-war platform. He was followed by incumbent Vladimir Putin in December 2023. ... (Source: Wikipedia: 2024 Russian presidential election) So what makes you think the candidates will be Putin 1 and Putin 2?
    1
  23158.  @hissgoescobra  "What is your view of Putin, boy?" Putin clearly cares for the people of Russia, and he wants to make Russia great again, despite the harsh treatment Russia is receiving from the West. At 4:50 of Cyrus' video, it shows that there's falling unemployment in Russia, so it's no wonder why many Russians continue to support Putin.
    1
  23159.  @granmabern5283  Capitalist imperialism is merely a disguise. Western imperialists pay lip service to capitalism, yet here they are explicitly seizing the private assets of rich Russians living in the West. Despite having committed no crimes themselves, wealthy Russians are having their football clubs and private yachts confiscated by the West. Whatever happened to the core concept of capitalism that is private ownership?
    1
  23160.  Lynn Michael  China publishes more research papers than any other country in the world, over a wide range of topics such as physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences. Countries by published scientific papers in 2016: 1. China (426,165 articles) 2. United States (408,985 articles) 3. India (110,320 articles) 4. Germany (103,122 articles) 5. United Kingdom (97,527 articles) 6. Japan (96,536 articles) 7. France (69,431 articles) 8. Italy (69,125 articles) 9. South Korea (63,063 articles) 10. Russia (59,134 articles) ... Source: List of countries by number of scientific and technical journal articles wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_scientific_and_technical_journal_articles This shows that many Chinese scientist and researchers are making discoveries and publishing their findings, contributing to mankind's scientific advancements.
    1
  23161.  @uselesshero.official  The government rushed to built a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised. Video: Huoshenshan: the hospital built in 10 days in China over coronavirus outbreak youtu.be/l2QfufpwfdY Kudos to the Chinese construction workers who worked hard to build those hospitals. China also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. Video: Time-lapse video shows how Leishenshan hospital completed in 12 days youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk
    1
  23162.  @panthervish30  "Oh wait, I forgot they don't care about the poor in China." According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china
    1
  23163. @solo ist So you're just pointing fingers and blaming China? An Italian scientist suggested that the novel coronavirus was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported back in Nov. 2019 Lombardy in the northern part of Italy, months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  23164.  @anwaydas817  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    1
  23165.  @anwaydas817  China has even launched space stations into orbit, the world's 3rd to do so after USA and USSR. China's first prototype space station, Tiangong-1 was launched in 2011, followed by Tiangong-2 in 2016. There was even a "space lecture" where Chinese taikonaut in space gave a lecture to her students on the ground from onboard Tiangong-1, demonstrating simple micro-gravity experiments in space. Video: Chinese teacher in space gives lecture to her students on the ground below youtu.be/OUAuZnpoZ58 By doing this, we are showing our kids (and future generations of Chinese) that China is both ancient civilization as well as a modern space nation, capable of achieving equally impressive feats as the Westerners in space. China is no longer the sick man of Asia, in fact, China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, and India have not launched space stations of their own into orbit.
    1
  23166.  @j.d.3269  China can monitor corruption on our side, but there's nothing China can do about corruption on the other side. That part is mostly left up to the governments and people themselves to solve.
    1
  23167.  @ne0ge049  You said: "are you crazy the US miltary is so massive it's larger than every miltary combined. China's miltary is only 1/10 the size of the US miltary." You said miltary size right? The People's Liberation Army is the world's largest land army even bigger than the U.S Army, so on what basis are you doing this comparison? The PLA Navy has more ships than the U.S Navy.
    1
  23168.  @ne0ge049  A US defense report estimates China has the world's largest naval fleet and is churning out new ships faster than ever, yet you're claiming China's miltary size is only a tenth that of the United States? U.S military leaders are also cognizant that in 2021 the PLA Navy is much more than ships.
    1
  23169.  @ne0ge049  US Hypersonic Missile Test Fails I Proof That US Is Behind China & Russia In Next Gen Weaponry youtu.be/ckpitGnrkwI
    1
  23170.  @julianchung9215  Hey there. This makes it the second time we met?
    1
  23171.  @MrFeatheredSerpent  As far as the Communist Party of China is concerned, they have been haven't mentioned anything about Peng Shuai, the closest is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs statement that "China does not support the politicization of sports". Otherwise, there is no comment from the CPC.
    1
  23172.  Gregory Jones  How many people in America would be willing to vaccinate even if was free? That is the question you should be asking.
    1
  23173. Allen Gerchman The PLA Rocket Force won't just launch a single ballistic missile, they will launch a volley of DF-21 rockets to increase the chances of impact. Even 2 or 3 volleys.
    1
  23174. +Grendel Prime China is the 1st country in the world to successfully mount an electromagnetic railgun onto a mobile platform like a navy vessel (Type 072III-class landing ship Haiyangshan 海洋山) and to have successfully test fired the railgun while at sea. Even the USA have not managed to get their railgun out of their land testing facility and onto actual sea trials.
    1
  23175. There have been numerous comparisons between China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank vs. Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams. And China's Type 99 has garnered a healthy reputation due to its performance parameters being on par with many top Western designs. And yes, China's new Type 55D destroyer has also been compared to American Ticonderoga class cruiser and the a Zumwalt class destroyer, in that it has similar capabilities and size to the Ticonderoga class, while packing some new capablities similar to the Zumwalt.
    1
  23176. China landed our very own lunar rover and spacecraft, Yutu and Chang'E-3 on the Moon in 2013, which was the first lunar exploration after nearly 40 years of neglecting the Moon by NASA.
    1
  23177. +Salty You considered India as a US Ally, but didn't consider Russia as a Chinese ally? Why omit Russia from your one-sided equation? Russia supports any country that oppose USA and can be counted on by China if USA goes to war with China. USA and India want to embargo Chinese goods, then what about the other countries that want Chinese goods? They aren't going to be too happy if you block their access to Chinese goods, and its going to be illegal to blockade trade routes.
    1
  23178. +Nathaniel Weber But why USA, the world's most powerful army, airforce and navy, still lost the Vietnam War to poorly trained, poorly equipped Vietnamese troops? If you want to claim that they blended into civilian populace, then the US soldiers in Vietnam torched villages, use poisonous defoliant chemicals like Agent Orange, and dropped Napalm bombs on villages. About PLA troops having low morale due to lack of combat experience, soldier morale is made up of many factors, not just combat experience alone. The simple fact that battles will occur close to Chinese territory, means PLA troops will be dying for our land, whereas US troops will be dying on foreign soil (again, like they did in Vietnam, Korea, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, etc) Like when you mentioned Indian and USA navies blockading China's coast and "suffocating" Chinese trade at our doorstep, such scenarios provide a morale boost to our PLA soldiers that we will be forced to fight to protect our homes and loved ones, or die. We have nowhere else to go after all. But your Indian and US soldiers still have safe homes back in India and America, so your troops will want to go home and thus, their determination will not be as firm as PLA troops, who have nowhere else to go. Morale not just a matter of "combat experience", but more towards the actual "motivation" for war. That's partially why the Vietnamese won, because US morale was low, whereas Vietnamese troops had to either fight or die, and had nowhere to run.
    1
  23179. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, the U.S appears to be a threat to global peace and stability.
    1
  23180. In mountainous combat scenario, China can deploy aerial units like our domestically made combat UAVs, like CaiHong-3 and Caihong-5, which provide valuable aerial reconnaissance and can be equipped with air-to-ground missiles to engage ground targets from the air, and has been compared with US Reaper Drone. But in December 2017, India recently crashed its Israeli made drone while trespassing in Chinese airspace.
    1
  23181.  @MarkYeung1  You think that the 2 Michaels are entitled to live in mansions, just because Meng Wanzhou lives in a mansion? They are from different income groups, so why'd you bring Meng's mansion? As for access to consulate services, Meng's rights were violated by the Canadian Border Services Agency. When the border confronted Meng , she was not allowed to contact her lawyer for advice before complying with the Canadian border officials. She was not told she was the subject of an arrest warrant and no one answered Meng when she asked repeatedly why she was being detained. Meng was also forced to hand over her computer, smartphone and electronic devices and forced to grant access so that border officials can search their contents illegally.
    1
  23182.  @MarkYeung1  What about the 2 Michaels? You believe the 2 Michaels deserve to live inside mansions of their own, when you said "Do they live in a mansion..." then why don't you go and buy mansions for them, since you worry that they aren't housed in a mansion? And when Meng's rights were violated, you just reply "of course Meng's rights were violated in some way."? As though violating Meng's rights is somehow okay and expected?
    1
  23183.  @MarkYeung1  Since Canada started this whole mess by arbitrarily detaining Meng Wanzhou, then shouldn't Canada be the one to release Meng and put her on the first flight back to China? Canada started this mess, so shouldn't Canada be the one to end this mess they created? You claim to be a supporter of Meng isn't it?
    1
  23184.  @MarkYeung1  Why you think the 2 Michaels should be entitled to their own mansions then, you tell me? This is the point that baffles me when you bring up "Do they live in a mansion..."
    1
  23185.  @maicholaa7482  You're the one who first started claiming my English proficiency is imperfect here. And which 3 Chinese words translated into 3 English words yields the acronym CCP? Let's hear those 3 Chinese words.
    1
  23186.  @maicholaa7482  "神州 Shenzhou You admitted proficiency imperfection!" When did I ever do that here in this thread? And which 3 Chinese words translated into 3 English words yields the acronym CCP? Let's hear those 3 Chinese words.
    1
  23187.  @maicholaa7482  Why are you bringing in things from another thread into here? And which 3 Chinese words translated into 3 English words yields the acronym CCP? Let's hear those 3 Chinese words.
    1
  23188.  @maicholaa7482  Which 3 Chinese words translated into 3 English words yields the acronym CCP? The name of the party is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) therefore it is the Communist Party of China (CPC). Because the Zhōngguó (中国) in the name clearly means China.
    1
  23189.  @maicholaa7482  The hypocrite is the one deflecting instead of answering the question of "Which 3 Chinese words translated into 3 English words yields the acronym CCP?" yet they accuse others of imperfect English proficiency.
    1
  23190.  @maicholaa7482  Since earlier you claimed that I admitted it, then you're saying that the hypocrite isn't me. But the hypocrite is the one deflecting instead of answering "Which 3 Chinese words translated into 3 English words yields the acronym CCP?"
    1
  23191. ​ @maicholaa7482  That sounds exactly just like what you are doing.
    1
  23192.  @maicholaa7482  If you read through the comment thread, it is apparent who first started accusing others of being a hypocrite here, so it's apparent who is the real hypocrite here, if you believe "hypocrites always accuse others of the very thing themselves!"
    1
  23193.  @maicholaa7482  Why don't you answer my question instead of digging yourself deeper into your hole? Do hypocrites always dig themselves into a hole in their attempt to deflect from answering questions?
    1
  23194.  @maicholaa7482  I already gave my answer that name of the party is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) therefore it is the Communist Party of China (CPC). Because the Zhōngguó (中国) in the name clearly means China, so it's the CPC, not the CCP. But I'm interested in hearing you answer to which 3 Chinese words translated into 3 English words yields the acronym CCP?
    1
  23195.  @maicholaa7482  My answer is for the acronym CPC, but let's hear your answer for the acronym CCP. Which 3 Chinese words translated into 3 English words yields the acronym CCP? Let's hear it from you.
    1
  23196.  @maicholaa7482  Yes is not a Chinese word. Why can't you name the 3 Chinese words that when translated into 3 English words yields the acronym CCP?
    1
  23197.  @maicholaa7482  Why would people who can speak both Mandarin and English resort to earning a meager 50¢ per post? And now you're claiming it's 20¢?
    1
  23198.  @maicholaa7482  Says the guy who can't even answer a question of "Which 3 Chinese words translated into 3 English words yields the acronym CCP?" And there's clearly no question mark in the statement: "Keep up the good work wumao, you just earned another 50c, although I heard that you only get 20c now" so it certainly isn't a question.
    1
  23199.  @maicholaa7482  But there's no question mark in the statement: "Keep up the good work wumao, you just earned another 50c, although I heard that you only get 20c now" so it isn't a question isn't it?
    1
  23200.  @maicholaa7482  But there's no question mark in the statement: "Keep up the good work wumao, you just earned another 50c, although I heard that you only get 20c now." so isn't that a claim not a question? Then why do you accuse others of being unable to differentiate between a question and a claim? Since you know questions so well, why don't you answer my question of "Which 3 Chinese words translated into 3 English words yields the acronym CCP?"
    1
  23201.  @maicholaa7482  Since you know the difference between claims and questions so well, why don't you answer my question of "Which 3 Chinese words translated into 3 English words yields the acronym CCP?"
    1
  23202.  @maicholaa7482  Because you asked me: "神州 Shenzhou So now you're criticising my English proficiency for criticising your English proficiency when you don't even know the acronym CCP is a translation from three Chinese words to three English words?" then which 3 Chinese words are you talking about?
    1
  23203.  @maicholaa7482  "Yes" is not a Chinese word. And those words don't translate to the acronym CCP like you said.
    1
  23204.  @maicholaa7482  So what are the actual 3 Chinese words that when translated into 3 English words yields the acronym CCP? Does this mean that you don't have a clue as to what you are claiming?
    1
  23205.  @maicholaa7482  Are you saying that you have no clue which 3 Chinese words translated into 3 English words yields the acronym CCP? Does that mean that you acknowledge it should be the CPC instead of the CCP?
    1
  23206.  @maicholaa7482  So you're acknowledging that it should be the CPC instead of the CCP, is that correct? Otherwise, which 3 Chinese words translated into 3 English words yields the acronym CCP?
    1
  23207.  @maicholaa7482  If you're acknowledging that the acronym should be CPC instead of CCP, then why not just outright admit it? Otherwise, which 3 Chinese words translated into 3 English words yields the acronym CCP?
    1
  23208.  @maicholaa7482  Why not just outright admit that the acronym should be CPC instead of the CCP? Is it really so difficult for you to admit that it should be CPC instead of CCP?
    1
  23209.  @maicholaa7482  You are, it seems! Apparently, you're even quacking like a duck, can you speak human language?
    1
  23210.  @maicholaa7482  What are you a pirate parrot? Please say: "The correct term is CPC, not the CCP."
    1
  23211.  @maicholaa7482  Aren't you imitating a parrot or a duck? Can't you speak human language?
    1
  23212.  @maicholaa7482  Can't you speak human language instead of bird language? And what's this CCP, when you have literally all but admitted that the correct acronym should be the CPC?
    1
  23213. A hegemonic bully can be overcome, if those bullied rally together against the bully. That's what Russia and China are doing against the world hegemon.
    1
  23214.  @bigdikcramer76  After the WWII, Japan had relinquished the claim to their formerly occupied territory in the surrender treaty, so how does China belong to Japan? Not to mention that Japan also failed to conquer all of China, unlike historically the Mongol during Yuan Dynasty or the Manchu during Qing Dynasty. So how does China belong to Japan?
    1
  23215.  @RealMysticalMan  "神州 Shenzhou so you think that any country or region that used to belong to another country should be under their rule?" If the colonizer grants independence to those colonies, or if they give it up as part of a surrender treaty, then it's no longer considered part of their territory. Like I said above, after the WWII, Japan had relinquished the claim to their formerly occupied territory in the surrender treaty, so how does China belong to Japan? Not to mention that Japan also failed to conquer all of China, unlike historically the Mongol during Yuan Dynasty or the Manchu during Qing Dynasty. So how does China belong to Japan?
    1
  23216.  @questworldmatrix  This comment of mine doesn't even seem to appear in Cyrus' comment section, how'd you manage to find it?
    1
  23217. Trump's always sh**ting BRICS
    1
  23218.  @LoveWatchingNDEs  The United States has the world's largest prison population.
    1
  23219. A recent survey for kids showed: Most Chinese kids' dream: Astronaut Most American kids' dream: YouTuber
    1
  23220.  @parnamsaini4751  "神州 Shenzhou Fu yoh...like that mein?" Why are you making racist remarks against me? Because I have a Chinese username?
    1
  23221.  @parnamsaini4751  Fu Yoh is from Egg Foo You and Mein is from Chow Mein isn't it? What's up with all this racist terminology that you're using against me?
    1
  23222.  @parnamsaini4751  "神州 Shenzhou FuYoh means.. wow!..mein means is it? nothing racist my friend." What language are you even speaking in? It's sounds basically like Westerners trying to use Chinese food terms to imitate Mandarin.
    1
  23223.  @parnamsaini4751  Again, what language are you speaking? I entered FuYoh and Mein into Google Translate and it detects it as Chinese. It sounds like a Westerners using the names of Chinese dishes to imitate speaking Mandarin.
    1
  23224. If the British had fully returned their Chinese colony of Hong Kong back to China, then why is Hong Kong even presumed to be granted autonomy in the first place? In 19th century, the British colonial powers stole Hong Kong from China after two bloody wars, so if Hong Kong is to be returned to China, then shouldn't it be returned fully? Not halfway here and there?
    1
  23225. Hong Kong was part of China long before Britain become powerful. During 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want to sell it to them, so the British waged two bloody wars with China, and forced us to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. After the war, Chinese port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. It was during this period, that Hong Kong was taken from China to act in a similar fashion. Once Britain renounced its rule over its former colonies, shouldn't Hong Kong be rightfully returned to Chinese mainland then?
    1
  23226. TEJAS TAMBAT How are Hong-Kong people different from Chinese? Cantonese is Chinese dialect, just like Mandarin, so you mean they are different because they speak different dialect of Chinese? India has over 1,000 different dialects but they are still considered Indians isn't it? And what has Tiananmen incident even got to do with Hong Kong? Hong-Kong and China follow the One China, Two Systems policy so what's Tiananmen issue got to do with this? What makes you think Hong-Kong wants freedom at all? Hong Kong was part of China since Qing dynasty and still relies on the China for power and electricity, as well as for economic trade. If Hong-Kong become independent, it means that they need to train own army, navy and airforce, because PLA is not going to protect them. Do you even know about this China-HK relations at all? Or with Tibet and Taiwan for that matter?
    1
  23227. TEJAS TAMBAT Why you just assume that people are communist propaganda like that? Cantonese is separate dialect from Mandarin, but they are still classified under Chinese language. And India suffer separatist movements in Kashmir and North East Indian provinces too. Why don't you explain how Tiananmen Square Incident is related to Hong Kong then, since you know so much about it? So because your HK friends tell you they want freedom, means all of HK's 7,000,000 people want independence? I have already outlined in detail how HK is dependent on China for power, electricity and protection, so in what makes you think HK can survive without China? Most HK people have jobs and family in the mainland which is why many prefer to remain with China. You claim the whole world knows about HK and China relations? Then why doesn't the UN countries mention HK or even Tibet issue to China's face during all those UN summits and meetings? President Trump currently acknowledges One China policy, that Taiwan is part of China. Trump is willing to recognize Jerusalem as part of Israel (much to Palestinians dismay) but he isn't willing to recognize HK, Tibet or even Taiwan independence.
    1
  23228. TEJAS TAMBAT Why don't you claim that you people are under Western propaganda then? Cantonese is Chinese dialect just like Mandarin, so why are you treating it like a different language altogether? To you, everyone else is brainwashed is that it? Even people of Kashmir? The Indian Army is continuing to rape Muslim women in Kashmir even till today with impunity, so why would they want to be part of India? North East India has separatists movements in Tripura and Manipur, but you just refuse to face reality that's all. When did I associate India's movements with Tiananmen incident? And in Hong Kong, it was HK authorities that deal with protestors so what has that got to do with Tiananmen at all? The PLA are not involved in HK protests. The Umbrella Movement is consist of only about 100,000 participants, mostly HK students and graduates who can't find jobs, so what makes you think it represent the views of all 7,000,000 HK citizens? Those students are idealistic and live in textbooks with lots of free time, so they can gather to protest, but those working adult people with families to support, aren't interested so they ignore these protestors. HK electrical grid is interconnected with the China Southern Power Grid of Mainland China, importing 23% of its total electricity needs from generating facilities with CLP's equity situated in the mainland. So how is HK even independent of China electrically? And HK doesn't even have an army, a navy and an airforce of its own, so how do you even expect HK to become independent here? What about HK water supply? HK import water from China all the time, but China never exercised the "water weapon" in our relationship with Hong Kong. You don't even think of HK real situation here. Trump recognize One-China policy, as does India, Russia, UK, Europe, and many of the world's major countries. Go ask US President Trump, Russian President Vladmir Putin, Indian PM Narendra Modi, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, etc whether they acknowledge One-China policy, and they will say yes. Since you claim UN resolution that No country can directly interfere in another country's internal matter, means that you recognize HK, Tibet, Taiwan are all internally part of China, isn't it?
    1
  23229. +TEJAS TAMBAT Not once did you even acknowledged that "Cantonese is Chinese dialect" at all in your previous comments. You clearly didn't said "Cantonese might be Chinese dialect" at all in your previous comments so why are you mocking my use of English language when you can't even read what your wrote previously? Who is the laughingstock here when your English standard is not even good enough to mock other people? Wikipedia is still a source that draws upon other sources for information. If sources are untrue or unverified than Wikipedia will remove it. What about the Kunan Poshspora incident occurred on February 23, 1991, when the Indian army raped up to 150 people on Kunan and Poshpora? This source is written by Indian so what do you have to say about that? Source: Politics of rape in Kashmir thehindu.com/opinion/lead/lead-article-politics-of-rape-in-kashmir/article6909603.ece#! It was precisely during IPKF intervention in Sri Lanka during its civil war, that the mass raping of Sri Lankan women occurred. Even your 1989 Valvettithurai massacre source said that this period also saw huge loss of civilian life, claimed rapes and number of instances of mass massacres, so why do you keep denying the rapes? The following articles highlights the plight of women as victims of Indian Army. Source: The wounds of war indianexpress.com/article/lifestyle/books/the-wounds-of-war/ Those aren't examples of PLA troop raping HK, Taiwan or Tibetans. The PLA troop that raped Vietnamese has been dismissed from PLA and punished according to Chinese laws. And the soldiers in PAP were sadly Tibetans themselves. These are all isolated cases done by individuals with single witnesses, unlike the mass rape crimes committed by the Indian Army openly, with multiple witnesses. Mao's Great Leap Forward has been openly criticised by the communist party, and Mao Zedong even made self-criticism himself and stepped down from being state chairman. Those people weren't intentionally massacred, instead they died due to unfortunate mass famine caused by the Great Chinese Famine in 1959, which was partially due to the poor weather. According to the following source, China's population in 1950 was 598,574,241 and in 1960 it was 644,450,173, so are you saying that during GLF, China's population fell by 40 million, but grew by 80 million afterwards? Source: Population of China 1950 populationpyramid.net/china/1950/ I have shown that at the most 100,000 HK people protested during umbrella movement. Otherwise, what is the exact figure you claim then? No where does it show that all 7,000,000 HK people participated in the umbrella movement, so how can you claim all HK people agree with the movement then? According to your source, the movement is considered very much a student movement, so does it represent the working HK adult or the ones married with kids and working in HK? Students live in textbooks and tend to be idealistic in nature, without knowledge of ongoing world events. Once these students graduate, find jobs, find an apartment to settle down, then they will finally understand what makes the world go round. I have shown that HK depends on the mainland for water, gas, electricity, and as a market to export and import goods, as well as on the PLA for protection. There are of course many other factors to consider if HK wants full independence (such as having enough food to feed its population, etc) What makes you think India or USA will even ally with Hong Kong then? India recognize Tibet and Taiwan as part of China, so it means it will ally with Hong Kong against China? Right now, Hong Kong enjoys loans from the Chinese mainland at much lower interest than India, so why would it want to break its loans with China for India's? How do you know HK has allies like Vietnam, Philippines, etc? If HK has small army, then it will be unable to defend itself from all those countries. I mean, Singapore can survive because it has one of the most advanced army in South East Asia to deter invaders. For HK to survive it will also need a strong enough army. In the HK army, who will form the troops? HK students will have to enlist in the army, which will undoubtedly be as unpopular as when Singapore enlist its soldiers. And where does HK even get the money to afford all these new tanks, fighter jets and ships themselves, if their economy is in a slump? -US President Trump has affirmed One-China Policy, meaning they recognize Taiwan as part of China. -The Tibetan government in exile is currently not recognized by any country, including its host country India. -ROC is still no longer a recognized UN member as agreed upon by UN members themselves. I think you are the one who don't know how the UN system work. Those 3 points above are agreed upon by UN members including USA, UK, Russia, France, Germany and even India, and so far, none of the UN members appear willing to change the above points. You can ask Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, Narendra Modi, Angela Merkel, etc, what their country's stance towards HK, Taiwan, Tibet, Xinjiang, etc and they will publicly say that those are Chinese territories.
    1
  23230. +TEJAS TAMBAT You never did acknowledge that "Cantonese is Chinese dialect" so why are you claiming that you did it since the first comment? Your didn't even mention "dialect" at all in your sentences so how is that acknowledgement at all? Why are you resorting to insulting me with derogatory terms? I don't insult you or mock your use of English, so why are you doing such things to me? Wikipedia is still sources its information from various different sources that have strict guidelines, so its often as reliable as any other source on the Internet. If the article doesn't meet the criteria, its simply taken down from the website that's all. Regarding Kunan Poshpora incident, Human Rights organizations including Human Rights Watch have said that the number of raped women could be as high as 150, so why are you claiming that it is totally a hoax when it isn't? Although the Indian government′s investigations into the incident rejected the allegations as "baseless," international human rights organizations have expressed serious doubts about the integrity of these investigations and the manner in which they were conducted. Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kunan_Poshpora_incident About IPKF rape in Sri Lanka, here is another article, claiming that IPKF who conducted peacekeeping operations in Sri Lanka between 1987 and 1990, had raped several Tamil women while also killing Tamil's, claiming that there is evidence for that. Source: Sri Lankan minister accuses Indian Peace Keeping Force of rape during LTTE war dnaindia.com/india/report-sri-lankan-minister-accuses-indian-peace-keeping-force-of-rape-during-ltte-war-2032121 The Tibetan Nun clearly said that they were Tibetan soldiers. She also said it was the PAP, not the PLA too. What famine in 1949? Mao Zedong founded People's Republic of China in 1949, and the famine only started in 1959 so why are you blaming Mao solely for this famine, when it was also partially due to the weather? Mao Zedong can't control the weather to make it good for crops so why are you blaming him for bad weather during that period? The communist party has long acknowledged Great Leap Forward failure and Chinese people can read about GLF on Baidu (Chinese Wikipedia) Here you can access Baidu and read about GLF and Chinese people in the mainland can also access Baidu to read about GLF. Baidu: Great Leap Forward (translated) https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=zh-CN&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fbaike.baidu.com%2Fitem%2F%25E5%25A4%25A7%25E8%25B7%2583%25E8%25BF%259B%2F228533&edit-text=&act=url You haven't given exact figure for HK Umbrella Movement, except that it is only started by non-working, just graduated students, who know nothing of the real world, and only interested in idealistic views imposed on them by their textbooks. The rest of 7,000,000 HK people are still going about their daily lives, not following the students and protesting. According to the following source, Hong Kong electrical grid is interconnected with the China Southern Power Grid of Mainland China. Hong Kong imports 23% of its total electricity needs from generating facilities with CLP's equity situated in the mainland. Source: Electricity sector in Hong Kong en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_Hong_Kong Actually, China is the world's largest agricultural exporter, supplying most of the world with vegetables and agricultural produce. China has the worlds largest pig farms and sheep farms. Our fishing industry makes up 2/3 of the world, and in aquaculture, our fish farms form 1/3 of the world's fish farms. As for India, India has a Global Hunger Index of 31.4 (serious) compared to China's 7.5 (low) so why don't India focus on feeding its population first? What has South China Sea suddenly got to do with Hong Kong now? Hong Kong has nothing to do with SCS issues. According to the following source, China's central bank interest rate is 1.75% wherea's India's is 10.01%. Source: List of countries by central bank interest rates en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_central_bank_interest_rates You have no evidence of Vietnam and Philippines being enemies of China. During his visit to Beijing, Philippines President Duterte was received in full military honors befitting that of a president. So what's the point of HK training its own army like Singapore, when it can be under the protection of PLA then? Singapore still relies on other countries to protect it, so would HK allocate resources and manpower to build an army of its own, when it can rely on PLA? The Central Tibetan Administration is not even recognized by its host country India, or USA, UK, Russia, France, etc. Those countries instead recognize China's sovereignty over Tibet. ROC was kick out of UN in 1971, and many major UN countries today recognize the One-China Policy that Taiwan is part of China. Why don't you get the world leaders to bring up Issue of Tibet or Taiwan or Hong Kong, etc during UN meetings? UN countries today can bring up Rohigya crisis with Myanmar/Burma, but not discuss Tibet with China? Look at US president Trump, he is willing to recognize Jerusalem as capital of Israel (to Palestine's dissatisfaction) but he is unwilling to recognize Tibet or Taiwan or HK?
    1
  23231. TEJAS TAMBAT Clearly you never said "Cantonese might be Chinese dialect" at all, so why are you claiming to have acknowledged it when you clearly didn't? Everyone can see that you fail to acknowledge this statement at all. I have read your comments multiple time and not once did you even mention that you acknowledge "Cantonese might be Chinese dialect" so why are you mocking my use of English? Do I insult you with derogatory terms like "bigot" or mock your English, just because your views are different from mine? Wikipedia draws its information from various real sources, not just Chinese ones like you claim. If an article of "Indian army rape" is proven to be false, then Wikipedia will take such articles down. Here is another article about Kunan Poshpora rape by Indian Army. In March 2013, motivated by them, 50 Kashmiri women from different walks of life had filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition demanding the re-opening of the case, but Indian Army is consistently denying the case from being reopened for investigations. Source: Kunan Poshpora: A forgotten mass-rape case of 2 Kashmir villages hindustantimes.com/india/kunan-poshpora-a-forgotten-mass-rape-case-of-2-kashmir-villages/story-1rmD1TqawPnMMB11LQzgyJ.html You keep dismissing IPKF atrocities in Sri Lanka, then what about Jaffna hospital massacre where the Indian Army killed 60-70 patients and staff? What about the 1989 Valvettiturai massacre where approximately 64 minority Sri Lankan Tamil civilians were killed by soldiers belonging to the IPKF? 1989 Valvettiturai massacre en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Valvettiturai_massacre Jaffna hospital massacre en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaffna_hospital_massacre The Tibetan nun clearly said that there were Tibetan soldiers, shouting that she was "Dalai’s running dog and that she betrayed our great nation". The Great Chinese Famine was caused by natural disasters. In July 1959, the Yellow River flooded in East China killing, either through starvation from crop failure or drowning, an estimated 2 million people, so how you expect Mao Zedong to stop the river from flooding? In 1960, an estimated 60% of agricultural land in northern China received no rain at all, so how can you blame Mao for not making it rain? Mao is just a man without any control over the weather conditions. You claim the GLF killed 45 million people over 4 years? From 1958 to 1962? According to the following source, China's population in 1955 was 598,574,241 and in 1960 it was 644,450,173. So you mean China's population reduced by 45 million after GLF, but grew by 45.8 million afterwards? Western media is only exaggerating the death toll to suit its anti-communist propaganda that's all. Source: Population of China 1950 populationpyramid.net/china/1950/ You claim 1.3 million HK people turnout during the Umbrella Movement, but that is still 18% of the country. A whopping 82% of HK population did not support the Umbrella Movement, so again, why are you claiming 7,000,000 HK people supported the movement then? Hong Kong still depends on 23% of its power from China. That is approximately one quarter of its power needs, so what makes you think it can independently generate all of its power very easily? China still exports more agricultural produce than India, according to your source. In 2014, China has world's largest pig farms at 474.1 million which is almost half of the world's entire pig stocks of 986.6 million. China is also world's larges producer of sheep, at 146.5 million heads followed by Australia at 101.1 million and India at 62.1 million. In the fishing industy, the top producing countries were the People's Republic of China (excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan), Peru, Japan, the United States, Chile, etc. Source: Pig Farming en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig_farming According to World Bank, rates of malnutrition among India’s children are almost five times more than in China, and twice those in Sub-Saharan Africa. Why don't Indians work on feeding their country's children first and working on lowering their Global Hunger Index of 31.4 (serious)? China's GHI is only 7.5 (low) so which is the more serious issue here? Source: Helping India Combat Persistently High Rates of Malnutrition worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2013/05/13/helping-india-combat-persistently-high-rates-of-malnutrition Again, what has Hong Kong's location near South China Sea got to do with this topic? Since when does USA even make phone calls to China on HK? SCS is an issue between China and our neighbors, not HK (which is part of China). I have shown Chinese bank interest rates to be lower than that of India's bank interest rates. Whereas your source for Indian banks' interest rates being as low as you claim? You are the one claiming Vietnam and Philippines will somehow "support" HK against China so where's your proof? China shipped our own weapons such as guns and sniper rifles to Philippines to help them combat the radical extremists hiding out in their islands. Duterte thanks ‘good friend’ China as it donates weapons for Philippine Islamist fight scmp.com/news/asia/southeast-asia/article/2100504/duterte-thanks-good-friend-china-it-donates-weapons Singapore has many regional enemies/competitors like Indonesia, Malaysia, etc so it still has to rely on USA for defense, despite having its own army. What makes you think HK will be happy without PLA? Without PLA for protection, means HK citizens have to serve in their army, they have to purchase weapons like tanks, fighter jets, warships, etc, meaning their economy will be adversely affected. They would still have to make good relations with China to depend on PLA for protection, so why bother creating an army of their own? Having no army frees up manpower and resources to concentrate on its economy. Tibet is autonomous region of China, as recognized by USA, UK, France, Russia, India, etc. When you draw the map of China, Tibet is regarded as part of China. Nobody draws the map of People's Republic of China without Tibet. ROC matter was raised in 2007, but the United Nations has rejected Taiwan's latest application to become a member of the world body, citing the organization's adherence to the "one China" policy and its recognition of the Chinese government in Beijing. Source: UN rejects Taiwan application for entry nytimes.com/2007/07/24/world/asia/24iht-taiwan.1.6799766.html?_r=0 According to the above source, Taiwan's UN bid was roundly condemned by China and also opposed by the United States, so since when does USA support ROC's bid at all? President Trump has not brought up any discussion about Tibet, HK or Taiwan with China (all Trump ever talks about is North Korea) so again, what makes you think world leaders are even discussing Tibet, HK or Taiwan? Where's your proof?
    1
  23232. TEJAS TAMBAT You are the one claiming you said "Cantonese are Chinese dialect" in your first comment but you clearly never said those words so why are you pretending to have acknowledged this statement at all? You never even mentioned "dialect" at all, until I pointed out "Cantonese is Chinese dialect" so how come you suddenly acknowledged it without any indication at all? All this arguing about that phrase, it still shows that Cantonese is Chinese dialect so why are you claiming that they want to separate the dialect and language? Where's your proof that they want to separate their language? Wikipedia is public and therefore, can be updated with information from all walks of life, not just from Pakistan sources, Chinese sources, or Indian sources, so what makes it unreliable then? People are free to change it when an article does not meet Wikipedia's criteria. What makes you think no evidence was uncovered in Kunan Poshpora incident? According to following source, there are examples of "torn hymens" and other such incriminating evidence, but the Indian army just dismiss everything and ignore everything the rape victims claim. If Indians distrust Kashmiri people so much, then why do they still want to claim Jammu & Kashmir as part of India then? Why not give it to Pakistan then? Source: Unravelling a ‘mass rape’ thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/unravelling-a-mass-rape/article4892195.ece#! Even according to your first source, a dozen of the women of just these two villages have had hysterectomies performed within a short period of their ordeal. the psychological trauma is even more than the physical one, and the raped victims were quietly married off to relatives or in distant villages as no one was willing to wed them in the area. Only people like you and the Indian Army are continuing to dismiss such claims. Sri Lankan Security forces may have participated in rape of Tamil women, but that does not mean IPKF is clean either. According to Amnesty International Report: “Several dozen Tamil women, some of whom needed hospital treatment, testified that they were raped by IPKF personnel. A local magistrate in the north reportedly found the IPKF had been responsible for seven cases of rape in December.” - Amnesty International Annual Report, 1988 for period January to December 1987 Source: Investigate Indian War Crimes in Sri Lanka: Rape of Tamil Women sinhalanet.net/investigate-indian-war-crimes-in-sri-lanka-rape-of-tamil-women The Tibetan nun clearly mentioned several times in her comment that Tibetan soldiers themselves mocked her for following Dalai Lama. According to the source your provided, the Tibetan nuns were beaten by women, not the PLA. Also, your source has inconsistencies, such as women designated to "feed pigs" died of starvation, and that only 4 out of 100 women assigned this chore survived? Where is your evidence for accusing PLA of raping Muslim women in Xinjiang then? The Yellow River flooding and the drought occurred on different years altogether, so whats so confusing about my post to label it propaganda? Weather still played a part in the Great Chinese Famine, so what makes you think it has to be either flood or drought that cause famine? As for your claims that millions of Chinese died, of course the famine will cause deaths, but the end result was that China's population grew by 45 million from 1955-1960 so your claims of 45 million perishing by Mao is unfounded, since there are so many factors leading to famine. Its just Western anti-communist propaganda meant to exaggerate the death toll to suit their agenda. You would think Chinese people would notice the deaths of 45 million people in our country. WW2 death toll was about 50-80 million, so you mean Chinese people failed to notice all those 45 million bodies? I have shown that China's population in 1955 was 598,574,241 and in 1960 it was 644,450,173 so where are the bodies, if China suffered a death toll similar to all of WW2? How did China grow to become world's most populous country if we suffered a death toll similar to all of WW2 with roughly the same duration? Its obvious that Westerner propaganda has grossly exaggerated this figure to suit their anti-communist purposes. Here is source about China's life expectancy growing from just 40 years to 45 years from 1950 to 1960. Source: China's life expectancy static.cdn-seekingalpha.com/uploads/2012/6/5/1763391-133891464788003-Stock-Whiz.png Your source on Hong Kong Umbrella Movement only claims 1.3 million HK participated in Umbrella Movement through online tweets. How is "tweeting" online even considered participating in the movement on the streets at all like you claim? You claim 7,000,000 HK people joined on the streets but where is your proof that all of HK's population are on the streets at all? You source even claims that it is a "digitized" fight so how can you claim that even those 1.3 million HK people are protesting on the streets? Hong Kong still doesn't produce 100% of its electrical needs. You claim the remaining 23% is easy for HK to produce, but HK has limited land so where is it going to build plants for the remaining 23%? Are its powerplants going to pollute the HK environment (which is already quite polluted) ? China's electricity grid is powering the remaining 23% of HK's power needs without HK feeling the effects of land scarcity and additional pollution, so what makes you think HK is capable of producing the 23% by itself? According to your source, China produce $63,490,864,000.00 worth of agricultural export. and India produces only $36,730,472,555.00 worth, so how can you even claim India is 2nd and China is 10th? Besides having the world's largest pig and sheep farms, China also produces more rice, wheat and potatoes compared to India, which are three of the world's staples. Rice: China 206.5 million tonnes, India 157.2 million tonnes, Wheat: China 126.2 million tonnes, India 94.5 million tonnes, Potato: China 95.5 million tonnes, India, 46,.4 million tonnes. Source: Rice Production en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice#Production_and_commerce Source: Wheat Production en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_wheat_production_statistics Source: Potator Production en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potato#Production "More than 1/3 of world's malnourished children live in India and among these, 1/2 of them under 3 are underweight. World Bank estimates that India is one of highest ranking countries in the world for the number of children suffering from malnutrition and is nearly double that of Sub Saharan Africa with dire consequences for mobility, mortality, productivity and economic growth." So why don't India fix its own problems first? Source: Malnutrition in India en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malnutrition_in_India What has birth defects got to do with this issue? Why are you trying to introduce South China Sea into this discussion about HK? According to the following source, HK celebrities: Wong Cho-lam, Leanne Li Yanan, William Chan Wai-ting, Yang Ying “Angelababy”, Donnie Yan Ji-dan and Hins Cheung defended China’s claim over SCS. Source: HK celebrities defend China’s SCS claims after court ruling hongkongfp.com/2016/07/14/hong-kong-celebrities-defend-chinas-claims-in-south-china-sea-after-intl-court-ruling/ After Trump's phonecall, he did not change US policies regarding One-China Policy and USA continues not to recognize Taiwan. I have already shown Chinese bank's interest rates are much lower than India's. You keep talking about imaginary debttrap but which country in the world is bankrupt and under China's imaginary debt trap? The top seven countries close to bankruptcy are Belarus, Argentina, Jamaica, Belize, Venezuela, Greece and Ukraine, and they have little to do with China. Source Seven countries near bankruptcy usatoday.com/story/money/business/2015/08/05/24-7-wall-st-countries-near-bankruptcy/31164239/ When did I claim Philippines and Vietnam will invade HK? Malaysia is raising water prices against Singapore, and Singapore suffered from Indonesian confrontation when it was part of Malaysia. You say what has this to do with HK, then why did you even bring up Singapore in the first place? HK economy in slump and cannot afford all those tanks, ships, aircraft for its own army, and by serving in the army, HK people will be not working or studying, so how would that make them happy? In the end, even with Army, HK will still rely on its relations with China for defense. Tibet is still drawn as part of PRC and the map's shape hasn't changed at all even till today. That means countries all over the world currently accept Tibet as part of China, and include Tibet into the Map of China every time they draw it. You are the one claiming ROC made a bid in 2006 to return to UN, so why is my 2007 source outdated? In the end, it was UN's decision to reject ROC's 2006 bid. According to my source, USA also clearly opposed ROC's bid which saw it as an effort to change the fragile status quo. If ROC made another bid in 2018 onwards, then USA, China and UN will undoubtedly reject its bid as they did in 2007.
    1
  23233. TEJAS TAMBAT When did you even acknowledge that "Cantonese is Chinese dialect" ? You didn't even mention "dialect" at all, until I brought it up, and even then, you failed to acknowledge that "Cantonese is Chinese dialect". Now you are claiming you never said that in your first comment because you never stated it? Now you suddenly claim that you they don't want to separate? Who is the one constantly changing his stance here after insisting on claiming that "Cantonese is Chinese dialect" ? Yet you continue to mock my use of English here? You yourself said "Wikipedia is public" so doesn't that mean that its knowledge is public knowledge? Why is it unreliable then? Any unreliable source that doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards is automatically taken down by the site. If you write such stupid accusation about me without any proof, then obviously the Wikipedia editors will take it down if you fail to provide proof. The victims of Kunan and Poshpora have been protesting for years because Indian medical examinations are biased towards Indian army. There are already incriminating examples of "torn hymens" but Indian Army just dismiss it. According to the following source, there are numerous accounts of women being raped but Indian army still continues to cover up its atrocities. Source: Kunan-Poshpora: Can Kashmiri Rape Victims Get Justice Against Indian Military After Two Decades? ibtimes.com/kunan-poshpora-can-kashmiri-rape-victims-get-justice-against-indian-military-after-two-decades You are the one thinking Kashmiri people are untrustworthy, so why India continue to fight for control over Jammu & Kashmir then? As for Tibetans, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Xinjiang, etc, they are all Chinese people, which is why China fight so hard for control over them. I am not the one saying these states should leave China, or that these people are untrustworthy. You are the one claiming Kashmiri are untrustworthy here, not me. Your source again says that "Fifteen or more of the women had to undergo hysterectomies following complications because of infection after the sexual violence on them." so why are you claiming that these women are fabricating stories? You call them illiterate is because India has only India literacy rate 72.1% compared to China's 96.4% literacy rate, but again, what has illiteracy got to do with being raped by Indian Army? Source: List of countries by literacy rate en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_literacy_rate The Sri Lankan Security force may have committed rape, but similarly, Indian Peace Keeping Force has several accounts of rape too. According to the following source, "One area of concern to Amnesty International were the reports of rape committed by Indian soldiers. In Dec 1987 a local magistrate found IPKF personnel guilty in 7 cases of rape and in January 1988 an Indian court-martial sentenced 4 Indian soldiers to 1 year in prison for raping Tamil women." Source: Abuses committed by the IPKF in Sri Lanka ecoi.net/en/document/1348818.html The Tibetan Nun clearly mentioned a Tibetan soldier, accusing her of being "Dalai Lama's running dog" and betraying her nation. Read your Tibetan Nun source again carefully. In July 1959, the Yellow River flooded in East China killing either through starvation from crop failure or drowning, an estimated 2 million people, while other areas were affected in other ways as well. Source: The Most Deadly 100 Natural Disasters of the 20th Century disastercenter.com/disaster/TOP100K.html So why are you claiming that the flood is propaganda by Deng Xiaoping? Deng was the one who was anti-Mao in a sense, so why would he cover up Mao's actions? You claimed that 45 million Chinese people have been killed by Mao, which is almost as much as entire WW2 minimally estimated death toll of 50 million, yet Chinese people did not notice a number of dead bodies equal to that of all WW2 in our country? In addition to that, China had One-Child Policy, but despite your death toll and this policy, China is still the world's most populous country? Its obvious that the death toll figure is grossly exaggerated by Western propaganda to suit its anti-communist purposes. Otherwise, how could China become most populous country, despite all those deaths and birth control? China's population actually grew from 598,574,241 in 1955 to 644,450,173 in 1960 (by about 45.8 million) so how could 45 million Chinese died under Mao, yet increased by 45 million again (double) again? Where did your source even claim 6.78 million joined in the Umbrella movement? All it showed was that 1.3 million supporters voiced their support online through tweets, not by actually protesting in the streets like those students, so how can you claim that they took to the streets to protest? Digitized only means that they simply like a comment, but shows nothing of their commitment to join the protestors on the streets. Hong Kong only generates 77% and if it wants 100%, means it will have to build more power plants, which occupy space, cause pollution and waste etc. HK is very land-constrained country so where is it going to build the power station for remaining 23% energy? HK pollution comes from its own powerplants and you said China uses nuclear power, which doesn't pollute the air, so how can you blame HK pollution on China then? Your source clearly listed top agricultural country exports as follows. ... 6. China $63,490,864,000.00 7. Spain $50,960,954,460.00 8 Canada $49,490,302,612.00 9 Belgium $43,904,482,740.00 .. .. 12 India $36,730,472,555.00 So how can you claim India largest exporter in Asia and 2nd, while China is 10th? Its your own source yet you refuse to read it? My units for rice export for India is in tonnes, whereas your 5 billion export claim is in dollars, so do you even see the difference in your argument? My statement that China produces more rice than India still stands, and here is another source to support it. Source: Top 10 Exporters of Rice (Countries) whichcountry.co/top-10-exporters-of-rice/ Jute is just one somewhat uncommon commodity. China is worlds largest producer of many common commodities like rice, wheat, potato even peanuts and apples as shown below. Source: Apple Production en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple#Production Source: Peanut Production en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peanut#Production_and_trade What has birth defects got to do with this argument at all? Birth defects has little to do with malnourishment and you can't truly do anything about birth defects, like you can do for malnourishment. China's Global Hunger Index is only 7.5(low) compared to India's 31.4(serious) Why don't India work on feeding its population and children first instead worrying about China? India's malnutrition is even higher than China's Hong Kong celebrities have expressed support for China's case in South China Sea, means they are wrong for their beliefs? You claim HK celebrities are doing it for self-promotion, then why are they even agreeing with China if it makes them unpopular? Where is the logic here? I have shown China's bank interest rates to be lower than that of India's. UN is just trying to inhibit China's growth instead of any real fears of a debt trap. I mean, there are seven other countries on the brink of bankruptcy, yet UN choose to focus on China instead of countries like Greece, who is truly going bankrupt? Like I said, what has Vietnam or Philippines even got to do with HK? Those countries recognize HK as part of China, so why do you claim they will support HK at all? China is HK's biggest economy, so why would HK cut ties with China to be like Singapore? Singapore is now water dependent on Malaysia, so why would HK want to cut off with China to be like Singapore? Tibet is part of China's map, as recognized by UN countries and drawn on their maps. Many other countries support One China Policy, and fail to recognize ROC. Even US rejected Taiwans bid in 2006 so what are you trying to claim here?
    1
  23234. TEJAS TAMBAT Why are you resorting to insulting me personally? Just because my views differ from yours? You clearly failed to mention "dialect" until I brought up the word, so how can you claim to have acknowledged that "Cantonese is Chinese dialect"? You clearly said Wikipedia is public site, so anyone, from Pakistani to Chinese to Indians can edit its articles as long as they provide reliable sources, so how is Wikipedia unreliable then? Now and then, Wikipedia will take down articles that violate its criteria, so it is as good a source of information as its criteria. There are so many witnesses accounts to Indian Army rape in Kunan Poshpora, but you just keep dismissing it like what Indian Army does. Medical examinations performed on the women revealed "torn hymens" as well as various hysterectomy procedures, indicating mass sexual assault had taken place. Here is another article petitioning that Kunan Poshpora rape cases be reopened, but Indian government and army have mounted efforts to stop these orders. Source:Kashmir: A look at the Kunan Poshpora rapes aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2016/10/kashmir-kunan-poshpora-rapes-161020121136644.html If you claim Kashmiri people can't be trusted, then why does India even want Jammu & Kashmir as part of its territory? Why not give it up to Pakistan if you dislike those people? The Tibetan Nun clearly mentioned Tibetan soldier involved in the atrocity and accusing her of being "Dalai Lama running dog" and betraying her country, so why are you continuing to deny this simple statement? Read your Tibetan Nun story again carefully. What famine in 1949? The People's Republic of China was founded by Mao in 1949 so when was there a famine during China's founding? I have already shown that In 1959, the Yellow River flooded and in 1959, the Yellow River flooded, causing crop failure and starvation, and then in 1960, an estimated 60% of agricultural land in northern China received no rain at all. These weather factors were obviously beyond Mao Zedong's control. You have failed to show that so many people supported HK Umbrella Movement. Your source clearly said that 1.3 million people "tweeted" their support for the movement, but said nothing of these people actively taking to the streets to show their support. In this digitalized world, you can show support by simply "liking" them on social media, but it doesn't mean that you physically showed up to protest on the streets. HK students have lots of free time, and follow textbook ideals without actually thinking of the consequences of their actions like real working adults. I have shown that HK is dependent on the remaining 23% of its electrical needs from China. HK doesn't have the space to build more powerplants to fill up the remaining need, and the pollution from such plants will make its pollution situation worst. As for other imports like food, here is list of HK's largest trading partners. 1. China: US$285.5 billion (55.3% of total Hong Kong exports) 2. United States: $42 billion (8.1%) 3. India: $15.4 billion (3%) Source:Hong Kong’s Top Trading Partners worldstopexports.com/hong-kongs-top-import-partners/ As you can see, China made up a large portion of HK's economy at 55.3%, compared to India's 3% so what makes you think HK will suddenly trade with India here? I have shown that Hong Kong's celebrities support China's stance in South China Sea conflict. You claim that they are doing it for self promotion, then why would they support the mainland's stance then if its so unpopular? Where is your source to show India's bank interest rate? I have clearly shown that China's central bank interest rate is 1.75% compared to India's 6.00%. Because of our lower rates, HK benefits greatly from Chinese loans compared to Indian loans because of India's higher interest rate. Source:List of countries by central bank interest rates en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_central_bank_interest_rates Vietnam and Philippines currently recognize HK as part of China. Look, even Philippines has dispute with Taiwan over South China Sea issue, and Philippines coastguard even shoot to death a Taiwanese fisherman, Hung Shih-cheng (洪石成) so what makes you think that these countries will automatically be on HK's side? Source:Relations sour between Taiwan and Philippines over fisherman's death http://edition.cnn.com/2013/05/17/world/asia/philippines-taiwan-dispute/index.html You brought up Singapore army, and claim that Singapore still rely on USA for defense, so like I said, what's the point of HK building its own army, if it has to rely on PLA for protection then? HK's economy is in a slump, so what makes you think it can afford to start from scratch building its own army? Where's the money going to come from? Tanks, Ships, Fighter Jets, etc, are not cheap and will create additional burden on their economy. As for the HK army personnel, having 1 million soldiers already means that HK's workforce will be 1 million workers shorter, adversely affecting its economy. Indian banks also charges 6.00% interest rate so what makes you think getting loans from India is viable move for HK? Like I shown above, 50% of HK's economy is dependent on China, so why would HK want to jeopardize that relation by declaring itself independent? Tibet is recognized as autonomous region of China by UN countries, including USA, UK, France, Russia, India, etc. and when the map of PRC is drawn, Tibet is incorporated as part of PRC in their maps. What you keep saying about how the map will change in future is only your own speculation that's all and nothing more. President Trump phonecall concluded with him recognizing the One-China Policy, that Taiwan is part of PRC. Otherwise, if you claim he is concern with ROC's freedom, then why didn't he indicate so through the phonecall to President Xi Jinping? ROC's bid back in 2007 was rejected by UN countries, including China and USA. You claim that 2017 Taiwan will make another bid but there's no guarantee that it will be successful. I mean, UN rejected ROC's bid back in 2007, so what makes you think they will suddenly change their mind this time? If ROC was really recognized, then why did UN even decide to kick ROC out of UN since 1971? I have shown that other UN countries recognize Tibet, HK, Taiwan, Xinjiang, etc as part of PRC, whether its through the Map of China, the One-China, Two Systems policy and the One-China Policy. All those states above were part of China even during Qing dynasty back in 1911, and the government has fought hard to regain control of our territories. Look at British India, being partitioned into India and Pakistan in 1947 (and later into Bangladesh) A country is strong if united and weak when divided. We don't want to become like India and Pakistan, two brother countries constantly fighting each other till today. Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, Narendra Modi, Angela Merkel and other world leaders have made their stance clear that they recognize Tibet, HK, Taiwan, etc as part of China. The current UN focus is on Rohigya crisis in Myanmar/Burma and also North Korea, not China's sovereignty over those territory. 77% is still not 100% and there is remaining 23% that comes from China. Otherwise, HK's power would only operate at 77% instead of 100%. China is generating 23% of HK power so if this power was cut off what will happen to HK's industries and household electricity consumption? China still produces more rice, wheat, potato, apples, peanuts, etc than India. China even produces more pork and mutton than India already, as well as fish too. China also world's largest producer of lettuce and cabbage according to following source. Source:Cabbage Production en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabbage#Production Source:Lettuce Production en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lettuce#Production Like I said, what has birth defects go to do with this discussion? If you want to talk birth defects, then India registers the highest number of infants born with disabilities in the world. "The number of infants with genetic disorders and birth defects in India is the highest in the world," said Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Center for Genetic Medicine Director and Society of Foetal Medicines President I C Verma. " Source:Infants born with defects highest in India http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/-infants-born-with-defects-highest-in-india...-but-trend-can-be-reversed-/723187 Why don't Indians focus on India's malnourishment and birth defect problems first, instead of complaining about China? India has Global Hunger Index of 31.4(serious) compared to China's GHI of 7.5(low) so which country has more urgent needs here? Pakistan is benefiting greatly from trade with China, and the economic corridor project is expected to generate 2.32 million jobs for Pakistani workers. Gwadar port is being invested to become a major hub for China's Belt and Road Iniative Source: CPEC to generate 2.32m jobs thenews.com.pk/print/176948-CPEC-to-generate-232m-jobs-in-two-years-report Which countries threaten One-China Policy? Even President Trump, the most powerful man of the most powerful country, still accepted the One-China Policy despite receiving phonecall from ROC. Here's the article showing Trump backing down after the phonecall. ""I fully understand the 'One China' policy..." Trump said on "Fox News Sunday." and Beijing responded by appreciating Mr Trump's acknowledgement of the One China Policy, calling the two nations "co-operative partners" who could "push bilateral relations to a historic new high". Source:Trump agrees to honour 'One China' policy despite threats bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-38927891
    1
  23235. TEJAS TAMBAT According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. India's literacy rate is only 72% meaning almost a quarter of Indians are illiterate. Of course the Taiwan fisherman is Chinese, when did I ever said he wasn't? Taiwan is part of China isn't it? But this goes to show that Philippines does not regard Taiwan as ally against China, so why would Philippines support Hong Kong like you claim? Aren't the people of Taiwan and Hong Kong, Chinese as well? How is it you can hear the conversation Trump spoke over the phone to ROC and conclude that USA will help ROC in 2020? President Trump called President Xi, and they both agreed that One-China Policy should remain. What makes you think China doesn't want to talk about ROC? My previous source at the bottom showed Trump making phone call to Xi to discuss One-China Policy isn't it? Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, etc, are all incorporated into PRC, whenever the Map of China is drawn. When did other countries recognize the independence of these states? Maps of PRC are all depicted with those states, so how can you claim that they recognize the independence of those states? You claim all those people are slaves under China, but the country with the most number of slaves in the world is actually India, not China. According to the following source, India has 18 million modern slaves, at least 5 times more than any other country in the world. So why don't India fix its modern slavery problem instead of worrying about Chinese being slaves? Source:India has 18 million modern slaves qz.com/695565/india-has-18-million-modern-slaves-at-least-five-times-more-than-any-other-country-in-the-world/ Soviet Union was strong while it was united. Same like USA is strong while unified from 50 states, and European Union is strong with 28 member states. So why can't China strive to remain unified and strong like these countries? A country is strong if unified and weak if divided. Look at British India, being strong when unified but today, it has been partitioned in India and Pakistan (and later, Bangladesh) which are brother states constantly fighting each other. How is Asia going to progress if countries fight each other like India and Pakistan? Look at Europe. France and England were enemies in the past, so was Germany with whole Europe at one point. but today, they are powerful when unified. Communist Russia collapsed in 1991 and many Western countries assumed communist China will soon follow suit. But its already 2018, and the China is still relatively intact, as well as being the world's 2nd largest economy, with an army funded by world's 2nd largest military spending, as well as being potential rival to USA. Donald Trump, Narendra Modi, Angela Merkel, Vladimir Putin, and even Shinzo Abe did not raise any issue about Tibet, Hong Kong, Xinjiang, etc to Xi Jinping. Like I said, the current focus of UN issues is on North Korea, and also Rohigya crisis in Myanmar/Burma. What makes you think the Korean missile crisis will be resolved anytime soon, for Tibet to ever become a topic? All of this talk about US will help Taiwan in 2020, or UN will focus on Tibet after North Korea is dealt with, is just your own speculation that's all. 77% is still not 100%. China supplies the remaining 23% of power to HK like it or not. HK has scarcity of land, so what room is there to expand their powerplants? Expanding their powerplants on HK territory also means more pollution in HK as a result, which is why they draw upon China's energy network for the remaining 23% instead. I already shown China produces more rice, wheat, potatoes, cabbages, lettuce, peanuts, apples, fish, pork and mutton than India. China also produces more onions, tomatoes and even salt compared to India. Source:Tomato Production en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomato#Production Source:Onion Production en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_onion_production Source:Salt Production en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_salt_production We are talking about production, so of course we use tonnes instead of dollars. You are the one mistaking dollars for tonnes in your units here, not me. Jute is only a single commodity, but every other commodity here I listed for China are often considered staples, unlike jute. I have shown that the malnutrition problem in India are almost 5 times more than in China, and twice those in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Global Hunger Index gave India a score of 31.4(serious) compared to China's 7.5(low) so why don't India fix its own malnutrition problem first before worrying about China? Source:Global Hunger Index Map (India:31.4, China:7.5) ghi.ifpri.org/ Source:India malnutrition 5 times that of China's, twice that of Sub-Sahara Africa worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2013/05/13/helping-india-combat-persistently-high-rates-of-malnutrition What do you mean nothing can be done about malnutrition? You can always feed them, but what can you do about birth defects? Also, according to the following source, India registers the highest number of infants born with disabilities. Source:Infants born with defects highest in India archive.indianexpress.com/news/-infants-born-with-defects-highest-in-india...-but-trend-can-be-reversed-/723187 You claim that HK celebrities are promoting themselves in HK, then why would they express support for China's stance in South China Sea, if that is the unpopular move here? How is that promoting themselves? You clearly said Singapore's army is small, so it will have to depend on other countries like USA to protect it. Since you claim HK army will be small, then they will still rely on PLA to protect them isn't it? Also, HK's economy is in a slump, so how can it afford to build its army by buying tanks, fighter jets, warships, ammunition, etc? Who is going to train HK soldiers to fight? What makes you think HK citizens want to serve in the army? 1 million soldiers serving in HK army, means the HK workforce will be deprived of 1 million workers, so how will that boost the HK economy then? Why would foreign investors want to invest in a country with slumping economy and small army to protect their investments? All your words are just speculation on your part without any proof. LOL did you even read your sources about CPEC myths? According to your sources, one of biggest myths propagated on CPEC is that Pakistan might become a colony/province of China, but the reality is Pakistan’s current trade deficit with China is $6.2 billion. In comparison, India’s trade deficit with China stands at $47 billion and US trade deficit with China is $347 billion. So US and India are China's colonies then? Also from your source, Another myth on CPEC is that China is dictating terms to Pakistan but the reality is quite the opposite. China and Pakistan work jointly in making an overall planning. Your source summarizes with the statement that economic benefits of CPEC are net positive for Pakistan. Vietnamese themselves aren't HK people, so why can they decide for HK want HK citizens want for their country, and support them online? They aren't the ones living in HK you know. Besides, your source also claims "The Vietnamese government worries about the Hong Kong protests. Anh Chi says police would stop any attempt in Vietnam to show support." China is Hong Kong's biggest trading partner, with 55.3% of total Hong Kong exports, worth $285.5 billion going to China, according to the following source. Singapore still depends on Malaysia for water, just like HK depends on remaining 23% of its power needs from China. Source:Hong Kong’s Top Trading Partners worldstopexports.com/hong-kongs-top-import-partners/ Tibet is recognized as autonomous region of China on the world map. Why don't you consult the world map and see for yourself? According to your source, President Trump questioned the One-China Policy, but then "stuck it back on again two months later, telling Xi Jinping, China’s president, that he would honour the One-China policy at President Xi’s request" The follow sources all show Trump accepting One-China Policy. Source:Trump Tells Xi Jinping U.S. Will Honor ‘One China’ Policy nytimes.com/2017/02/09/world/asia/donald-trump-china-xi-jinping-letter.html Source:Trump agrees to support 'One China' policy in Xi Jinping call theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/10/donald-trump-agrees-support-one-china-policy-phone-call-xi-jinping Source:Backing away from a fight, Trump to honor one-China policy washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/trump-agrees-to-honor-one-china-policy-in-call-to-xi-jinping/2017/02/10/ea6e7ece-ef4a-11e6-9973-c5efb7ccfb0d_story.html?utm_term=.490da0076ab9
    1
  23236. TEJAS TAMBAT In 2015, adult literacy rate for China was 96.4 %. Adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5 % in 1982 to 96.4 % in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39 %. This is taken from the following source. Source:China - Adult (15+) literacy rate knoema.com/atlas/China/topics/Education/Literacy/Adult-literacy-rate You just said Philippines thought they are Chinese, which they are since Taiwan is part of China, so why are you trying to deny this suddenly? Are you going to deny again that "Cantonese is Chinese dialect" again? I have shown numerous articles that Trump accepts the One-China Policy as of 2017, after phone call to Beijing. I have also shown that UN countries rejected ROC's bid back in 2007 and that even USA rejected it (Trump wasn't president back in 2007 though) The below statement is taken from following source. "Taiwan's UN bid was roundly condemned by China and also opposed by the United States, which saw it as an effort to change the fragile status quo that has governed relations among the three since Washington transferred its diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing in 1979." Source:UN rejects Taiwan application for entry nytimes.com/2007/07/24/world/asia/24iht-taiwan.1.6799766.html?_r=0 Regarding neighbor disputes, China signed many agreements with our neighbors here. -In 1961, Nepal and China signed border agreement. -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1991, USSR and China signed Sino-Soviet border agreement. -In 1992, Laos and China signed border agreement. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border agreement. Only India and Bhutan refuse to sign agreement with China to settle our dispute once and for all. You claim other countries recognize Tibet, Hong Kong, Xinjiang, etc, then why are they incorporated into the Map of People's Republic of China? It goes to show that countries all over the world regard these countries as part of China, and published Maps of China accordingly. Just look at World Map and see for yourself. You claim Chinese people are slaves, but the country with the most number of people living in modern slavery is actually India, with over 18 million living in conditions of slavery, about 5 times more than any other country. Why don't Indians do something about their slavery conditions instead of complaining about China? Even this source doesn't claim 1.3 billion Chinese as slaves, so how can you claim 1.3 billion Chinese as slaves then? Source:India Has the Most People Living in Modern Slavery blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2016/06/02/india-has-the-most-people-living-in-modern-slavery/ Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, Angela Merkel, Shinzo Abe, Narendra Modi, and other world leaders are focusing on North Korea, and the Rohigya Crisis in Myanmar/Burma. Nothing is being mentioned about Tibet, HK, Xinjiang etc. to Xi Jinping's face. Soviet Union failed because it transited from communism to democracy too quickly and rapidly, causing the satellite states to break away from Russia. China has learnt lessons from Soviet Union's fall, which is why China was able to transit from communist market to capitalist market, without losing control any of our territories. European Union is democratic, but democracy is also tearing EU apart, just like Brexit, where many UK citizens choose to leave the EU. British PM David Cameron even resigned after calling a referendum in which majority of voters voted to leave the EU. Can't you see that democracy is going to allow states to break apart from a union? Source:David Cameron resigns after UK votes to leave European Union theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/24/david-cameron-resigns-after-uk-votes-to-leave-european-union India and Pakistan are fighting each other even till today after being partitioned, but why was there a need to partition in the first place? British India was powerful and consisted of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, so why did it need to partition? Imagine if Indian leaders like PM Nehru or Mahatma Gandhi had remained firm against the British, and had not allowed the partition to have taken place. So much bloodshed and lives lost during partition and subsequent wars between India and Pakistan could have been avoided, if partition had not taken place at all, and British India would be unified instead of divided into India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. If your leaders are soft and peaceful, like Nehru and Gandhi, then British people will walk all over you and divide your country. Now its too late and partition has taken place, so why not attempt to mend relations now, instead of fighting each other for over 70 years? How is Asia going to progress if its states are fighting each other? China's "ghost" cities are slowly being filled up, as more people from rural countryside migrate to the cities. For example Zhengzhou was once considered China’s largest ghost city in 2011, but today, Zhengzhou has a population of 9,378,000 inhabitants. China still has millions of people living in the countryside migrating to the cities to seek better opportunities, but of course the process is slow and it will take time to fill up China's ghost cities. Here are 5 more Chinese ghost cities that got filled up over time. Source:5 Chinese Ghost Cities that Came Alive vagabondjourney.com/5-chinese-ghost-cities-came-alive/ North Korean Missile Crisis been going on since 2003 for many years, and it is unlikely to be resolved anytime soon. Even North Korea and South Korea were originally one country, Korea, up till 1905 but have been separated for over 70 years, until the new generation of Koreans hardly regard the other country as part of their country. Like I said, a country is strong if unified and weak if divided. Other countries that were once separated, such as North and South Vietnam, and also East and West Germany (during Cold War) eventually reunified after 20 years and 40 years respectively, so the two halves regard each other as a single country. But North and South Korea been separated by 70 years until new generations of Koreans no longer see themselves as single country. 77% is still not 100%, and China supplies the remaining 23% of HK's power needs. It is nothing to sneeze at, and cutting off the remaining power, means HK loses about 1/4 of its electrical needs, which can be compared to 1 in 4 HK household not having electricity. HK has land constraints, meaning it can't build more powerplants or expand existing plants without taking up valuable land. Also more plants means more pollution for HK (which is already quite polluted due to its existing coal plants). China offers a less polluting alternative to HK, by allowing it to tap into China's electrical grid for power instead. I already quoted several sources where China produces more rice, wheat, potatoes, pork, mutton, fish, lettuce, cabbages, peanuts, apples, onions, tomatoes and even salt, than India. China also produces more chili Peppers, walnuts and chestnuts than India, according to the following sources. Source:Walnut Production en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walnut#Production Source:Chestnut Production en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chestnut#History Source:Chili Pepper Production en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chili_pepper#Production In terms of production, we are interested in how much is actually produced, not the costs involved. Costs can fluctuate greatly with market prices according to supply and demand, but the amount produced in tonnes indicates how capable a country is at producing the commodity. That's why we look at tonnes and quantity instead of prices. India's Malnutrition is 5 times more than China's and twice that of Sub-Saharan African countries, according to World Bank itself. That's why India is given a score of 31.4(serious) by Global Hunger Index, compared to China's 7.5(low) Why don't India fix their own hunger problems first? HK celebrities are living in HK and mostly star in HK films, not mainland Chinese films. If they are doing it for self promotion, then it should be towards HK citizens who watch their shows, so why would they support China's stance in South China Sea issue, if it was unpopular. Just like Jackie Chan, he is famous Hollywood star, even you know his films, so if its for his self-promotion, then why support China's stance in Hollywood and USA, if it is unpopular? You clearly said Singapore army is small, so they depend on USA to protect them, so why would HK want small army, when in the end, it will have to rely on PLA for defense? PLA is the one protecting HK from external threats. If HK fishing vessel is harassed, Chinese coastguard will be dispatched to protect their vessels. HK's economy is in a slump and taking away 1 million HK workers to serve in the army, is only going to tax its economy more. Also, buying tanks, weapons, fighter jets, ships, ammunition cost $$$ as well as maintenance of such equipment costing $$$. Your source clearly says Pakistan being Chinese colony is a myth, since Pakistan's trade deficit is only $6.2 billion. compared to India's $47 billion and USA $347 billion trade deficit, so how is Pakistan a colony here? We are talking "trade deficit" here after all, and its from your source, not mine. Only 1.3 million support HK Umbrella movement digitally not physically on the streets. Singapore still relies on Malaysia for water, just like HK rely China for power. China and Taiwan are still technically "at war" so China is only taking precautions here by pointing weapons against ROC, in case of war being resumed at any moment. Your source is just Taiwan source urging Trump to support ROC. But Trump made his statement to follow One China Policy very clear many times. Currently, USA has zero bases in Taiwan, despite your claims. You see, all you are giving are just speculations without any proof whatsoever. Where's proof that US support ROC in 2020 etc?
    1
  23237. TEJAS TAMBAT What about all my other points then? Does this mean that you fail to address all other previously mentioned points? Also, all you shown about Taiwan is that USTDC was a planning headquarters for the defense of Taiwan and it was only active from 1955 to 1979. Today, it is no more and the former site of the USTDC headquarters became the Taipei Fine Arts Museum in 1983.
    1
  23238. TEJAS TAMBAT You only posted one comment since your last post, so I only answer that single post that's all. I think you are the English Impaired one. I clearly said: "Currently, USA has zero bases in Taiwan, despite your claims." so what makes you think I was talking about the past? Again, it isn't even 2020 yet, so why speculate on things in the future? If Trump truly recognized Taiwan Independence, then why he choose to honor One-China Policy after phonecall to Xi Jinping? He clearly choose to recognize Jerusalem as part of Israel (much to Palestian's dismay) and intent to shift the US embassy to Jerusalem to prove his point, so why didn't he choose to recognize ROC independence then?
    1
  23239. TEJAS TAMBAT There is only one comment that's all, so I just replied to it thats all. You said "continue from above" but you have nothing above, so why are you blaming me and calling me English Impaired when there clearly isn't anything above it? What have my parents suddenly got to do with this? I don't insult your parents or call you derogatory terms like bigot, unlike what you keep doing to me. Why don't you answer all my previous questions then? So far, you have shown no proof of any military base in Taiwan, so how can you go on about a secret military base, when its only your speculation? I clearly said "Currently, USA has zero bases in Taiwan, despite your claims." as thus far, this statement still stands unchallenged. Again, why are you talking about 2020 when its only 2018? You are just speculating about the future that's all, when it hasn't happened yet. According to your source, he plans and operations are outlined in a new book published this week, The Chinese Invasion Threat by Ian Easton, a China affairs analyst with the Project 2049 Institute, a think tank so why is considered confirm, when its just from a think tank that's all?
    1
  23240. TEJAS TAMBAT I have counted exactly 44 comments as of now. Your last few comments all have a single post, so whats 3 comments that you are even talking about? You clearly only said a single comment, so I will only respond to the comment you posted. You are the one fabricating fake comments when you clearly have nothing to say. You brought my parents into this argument for what? I didn't bring your parents into this argument, and neither do I insult you with derogatory terms like Bigot so why are you insulting me personally? Because you can't attack my points? All my previous points still stand uncontested. You have shown no proof of secret US base in Taiwan. You source clearly said that USTDC was a planning headquarters, only active from 1955 to 1979. Today, it is no more and the former site of the USTDC headquarters became the Taipei Fine Arts Museum in 1983. You call me illiterate, when according to UNESCO India literacy is only 72.1% compared to China's 96.4% ? President Xi Jinping said no such thing about a invasion of Taiwan in 2020. You claim he said it, so what are his exact words in Chinese then? That would be the exact, unaltered words taken directly out of his mouth, so can you quote me what words he said then? Otherwise it is apparent that you are unable to answer all my points. I have shown that India has world's highest number of people living in modern slavery at 18 million people, according to Global Slavery Index. India has 5 times more malnutrition than China, and twice that of Sub-Saharan Africa, according to World Bank. And India's Global Hunger Index is 31.4(serious) compared to China's 7.5(low). In fact, India tops world hunger list with 194 million people, so why don't you fix your country's problems instead of complaining about China? Source:India has 18 million modern slaves, at least 5 times more than any other country qz.com/695565/india-has-18-million-modern-slaves-at-least-five-times-more-than-any-other-country-in-the-world/ Source:Rates of malnutrition among India’s children are almost 5 times more than in China, and twice those in Sub-Saharan Africa worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2013/05/13/helping-india-combat-persistently-high-rates-of-malnutrition Source:India tops world hunger list with 194 million people thehindu.com/news/national/india-is-home-to-194-million-hungry-people-un/article7255937.ece China also produces more rice, wheat, potatoes, pork, mutton, fish, lettuce, cabbages, peanuts, apples, onions, tomatoes, walnuts, chestnuts, chili peppers and even salt, than India. China also produces more grapes and carrots than India. Source:Carrot Production en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrot#Production Source:Grape Production en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grape#Distribution_and_production
    1
  23241. planetzito Which part of my comment did I ever divert the from the topic here? The OP mentioned Japan and Korean copyright laws at one point so why can't I express my views on it without being thought of as 50c party by you? And can you produce evidence of me even mentioning the communist party here at all? Otherwise, why do you think that I am part of 50 cent army here?
    1
  23242. There is no internationally recognized West Philippine Sea on the globe, but there is a South China Sea. Also, Taiwan rejects the ruling on the South China Sea, in fact Taiwan claims a larger swathe of the South China Sea (through 11-Dash Line) than mainland China's 9-Dash Line.
    1
  23243.  JarJarBinks  HiSilicon's Kirin 990 is already available in Huawei foldable phone Huawei Mate XS. Video: Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G - Kirin 990 - 8+256GB - First Look - Hands-on youtu.be/Q0vZMvMqvHg
    1
  23244.  @s.ludden5700  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  23245. As long as the government does a good job, they will have the majority of people's support.
    1
  23246. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  23247.  @jayshah3582  China does not tell other countries how much to borrow, Sri Lankan government choose to borrow loans from Chinese banks that they can't afford to pay back, so China and Sri Lanka worked out a deal to allow China to develop Hambantota Port for 99 years. Meanwhile Sri Lanka is freed from having to repay the loan to China and can focus their revenue elsewhere. After 99-years, Hambantota Port will be fully returned back to Sri Lanka and the debt considered repaid. This is long-term benefit for Sri Lanka.
    1
  23248.  @PyroMax  Yes, China is not at war, which country is China currently at war with, you tell me? Our last major conflict was in 1979 and the People's Liberation Army haven't had any actual combat experience since then. But that does not stop China from improving our weapons and becoming the world's 3rd largest weapons exporter. Every country needs weapons, but that does not mean that China is at war, isn't it?
    1
  23249.  @PyroMax  China has inducted the world's first operational anti-ship ballistic missile, a "carrier killer" capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, known as the DF-21D. Video: China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile youtu.be/p-cEunmqXM8 The DF-21D is capable of targeting aircraft carrier strike groups out in the open ocean, from the safety of the land. The DF-21D is launched from land-based mobile launchers and flies high up into the stratosphere, using its advanced maneuverability to avoid interception by anti-missile defenses below, before falling at hypersonic speeds (above Mach 20) The warhead is even capable of terminal guidance, making last minute adjustments to its trajectory just seconds before impact.
    1
  23250.  @PyroMax  China has hypersonic missiles like the DF-ZF, which have been tested 7 times already and travels at speeds between 4,000 and 7,000 miles per hour. Source: China Successfully Tests Hypersonic Missile freebeacon.com/national-security/china-successfully-tests-hypersonic-missile/ U.S. intelligence officials have assessed that China plans to use the glider to deliver nuclear weapons through increasingly sophisticated missile defenses. The DF-ZF also could be used as part of a conventional strategic strike weapon capable of hitting targets around the world within an hour.
    1
  23251.  @PyroMax  China is home to the world's longest range ICBM, the DF-41 with operational range between 12,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the US LGM-30 Minuteman range of 13,000 km. Video: China missile test DF-41 launch from railroad train youtu.be/h2kjMctT8yU?t=13
    1
  23252.  @PyroMax  China's DF-17 is the first hypersonic glide vehicle-equipped missile intended for operational deployment ever tested. Source: Introducing the DF-17: China’s Newly Tested Ballistic Missile Armed With a Hypersonic Glide Vehicle thediplomat.com/2017/12/introducing-the-df-17-chinas-newly-tested-ballistic-missile-armed-with-a-hypersonic-glide-vehicle/
    1
  23253.  @jayshah3582  "I have 1million in my bank account,Bank is ready to give me 100million$ loan with 5% interest rate. Should I take it?" It's your choice if you want to take it. China does not point a gun at you and force you to borrow from the our banks, nor do we tell you how much to borrow, so why blame China for offering loans to Sri Lanka? But the point is, you only have 1million$ but you still need more $$$ in order to develop your country. You need an injection of capital to kickstart your economic development, and IMF and Western banks refuse to lend you money (because too risky to lend you money), so why not borrow from Chinese banks?
    1
  23254.  @jayshah3582  Over the last 18 years, China has cancelled debt to other countries, amounting to around $9.8 billion. Source: China Has Forgiven Nearly $10 Billion In Debt. forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2019/05/29/china-has-forgiven-nearly-10-billion-in-debt-cuba-accounts-for-over-half/ In 2007, the biggest year for debt forgiveness by Chinese entities, some 25 nations saw their debt written off. But even those 25 nations were no match for the Cubans. They had a sum of just $838 million wiped out, over six times less than Havana.
    1
  23255.  @PyroMax  Besides the DF-21D "Carrier Killer" Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile, China also has DF-26 ASBM, which is a bigger variant with extended range, able to hit the US territory of Guam. Hence, DF-26 is nicknamed "Guam Killer." China's new Dongfeng-26 ballistic missile can hit the US territory of Guam. Video: China's DF-26 ballistic missile drill sends 'clear message' to the U.S. youtu.be/Y5f-qvnabHY The mid-range missile can travel up to 5,740km (3,570 miles). It's in-flight maneuverability makes it easier to hit moving targets like aircraft carriers. This DF-26 drills are seen as a message to the US about China's growing military power.
    1
  23256.  @cyberaustin-testchannel3276  How is my government lying to me? Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? Here's a short 2-min video of the beautiful night view of 11 Chinese cities in China. Video: Beautiful Night View of 11 Chinese Cities in 2 Minutes - 中国大陆11座城市美丽夜景 youtu.be/mzR8Scsd33g (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  23257.  @cyberaustin-testchannel3276  The Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (world's most spoken language by number of speakers) Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth and they learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America. What's your point?
    1
  23258.  @cyberaustin-testchannel3276  Have you actually been to Xinjiang, Uighur Autonomous Region of China and see what life is like there for yourself? Here's a short 1-min clip of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China. Video: Drone Aerial Night View of Urumqi, Xinjiang's Capital in China youtu.be/MkhORviAhDI Here's the full 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China. Video: 新疆乌鲁木齐灯光秀抖音首发，请安静的看完 youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  23259.  @cyberaustin-testchannel3276  Who says that they aren't allowed to return home? The Uighurs in reeducation schools can take the weekends off and the schools charter buses to take them back to their villages (which may be remote, especially in Xinjiang) Video: Uighurs in school can go home at weekends youtu.be/OrfBIH8d9Wc?t=182
    1
  23260. In Western countries there are jobless people who can live off government welfare and survive by collecting foodstamps, while refusing to find a job. Meanwhile the people who are actually working are paying taxes to support such a system. In China, we are moving towards a meritocracy, where people get rewarded for performance, and if your score falls too low, then you will be temporarily prohibited from flying or going on trains. But it is not the end, and there are ways to raise your score in the end.
    1
  23261.  @Birch37  The USA is not doing China any favors, they literally took the East Turkestan Islamic Movement terrorist organisation off the list of terrorist organisations, so USA is giving the green light to separatists seeking to separate Xinjiang from the mainland.
    1
  23262.  @havaianuu  You said: "The ancient and rich culture was nearly completely wiped out by the culture revolution." What makes you think China's ancient and rich culture is wiped out? China has many historical monuments like for example the Great Wall of China, Forbidden City, Terracotta Army, The First Emperor's Tomb, The Grand Canal (world's longest artificial canal) so what makes you think China's ancient and rich culture is gone?
    1
  23263.  @yslee1401  You said: "Japanese and Korean have their respective unique cultures that are way more sophisticated than those PRC cultures." How so? The Japanese Kimono and Korean Hanbok have their origins in the traditional Han Chinese clothing known as Hanfu (汉服). Japan today still uses Chinese characters Hanzi (汉字) which they call Kanji and some parts of Korea still use Hanzi too.
    1
  23264.  @yslee1401  Taiwan island inalienable part of China. Taiwan is not an independent nation, tell me when was Taiwan's independence day? Why hasn't Taiwan formally declared independence since you claim they are? Even Taiwan calls itself the Republic of China and they consider Taiwan as part of China.
    1
  23265.  @zackk4969  A director and film maker? Why not look at what the former Director for CIA and U.S Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo admitting that "We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole"?
    1
  23266.  @zackk4969  “Diary of a Madman”.《狂人日记》 is a work of fiction by Lu Xun, then why are you confusing fiction with reality?
    1
  23267.  @zackk4393  Synopsis: The story was inspired from a fiction entitled “Diary of a madman” written by Nikolai Gogol in 1834. As the title suggests, the story outlines a diary written by a madman. The allegory was conveyed by a first-person narrator. source:wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Madman%27s_Diary#Synopsis
    1
  23268.  @zackk4393  So you admit that “Diary of a Madman”.《狂人日记》 is a work of fiction by Lu Xun? Then we are in agreement after all.
    1
  23269.  @zackk4393  Where does it say that it's based on a true story? According to its Synopsis: The story was inspired from a fiction entitled “Diary of a madman” written by Nikolai Gogol in 1834. source:wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Madman%27s_Diary#Synopsis
    1
  23270. The U.S has been at war 225 out of 243 years, since 1776.
    1
  23271. Nauru has recently severed diplomatic ties with Taiwan and switched its recognition to mainland China.
    1
  23272.  @bernardocarpio2831  Nauru cutting diplomatic ties to Taiwan and switching it's recognition of China to the mainland has far more impact on the global stage than your congratulations.
    1
  23273.  @deschan2246  It shows that Nauru has much to gain from developing relations with mainland China (which most of the world does anyway) compared to Taiwan, and that Nauru is looking out for it's own interests. And how is China spending money on developing Nauru considered wasted? What has Taiwan offered Nauru in exchange?
    1
  23274.  @g.b.alejandro6268  Explain what does Nauru gain by recognizing Taiwan as the "real China?" During the Chinese Civil War, the Kuomintang had wealth, superior equipment and superior numbers over the CPC. Yet despite these advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to bunch of outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. Why then should Taiwan be recognized as the "real China?"
    1
  23275.  @g.b.alejandro6268  In 1971, the United Nations democratically voted to kick Taiwan out of the UN and to recognize the mainland as the real China. Any change in China's representation in the UN was to be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The vote results were: 76 in favor, 35 against and 17 abstained. Since China won the vote with two-thirds majority, the UN resolution was passed on 25 October 1971 and recognized the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed the Republic of China 🇹🇼 from the UN.
    1
  23276.  @g.b.alejandro6268  In 1971, the United Nations democratically voted to kick Taiwan out of the UN and to recognize the mainland as the real China. Any change in China's representation in the UN was to be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The vote results were: 76 in favor, 35 against and 17 abstained. Since China won the vote with two-thirds majority, the UN resolution was passed on 25 October 1971 and recognized the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and removed the Republic of China 🇹🇼 from the UN.
    1
  23277.  @g.b.alejandro6268  So why the ROC lose the mainland to the PRC and had to flee to Taiwan island? If anything, this shows KMT's gross incompetence in the right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China.
    1
  23278.  @g.b.alejandro6268  So why the ROC lose the mainland to the PRC and had to flee to Taiwan island? If anything, this shows KMT's gross incompetence in the right to rule the mainland, while cementing the CPC's right to rule China.
    1
  23279.  @deschan2246  How's that a wastage of money, resources and time? Nauru is a member of the United Nations, and if mainland China is able to gain an ally in the UN, then it's clearly money, resources and time that's well spent.
    1
  23280. The support China group isn't as large as the anti-China group.
    1
  23281. Pretty soon, even the phrase "viva the diversity" will be replaced by "Allahu Akbar!"
    1
  23282. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  23283. Just like how NASA is banned from working with Chinese scientists and Chinese taikonauts aren't allowed on board the International Space Station. So China launched a space station of its own.
    1
  23284. The Wolf Amendment prohibited NASA from collaborating with Chinese scientists. Only after China landed on the far side of the Moon was this ban reversed.
    1
  23285. NASA was also prohibited from working with Chinese scientists. It's only until China landed on the far side of the Moon was the prohibition removed.
    1
  23286. NASA was also banned from working with Chinese scientists, until China landed on the far side of the Moon.
    1
  23287. "Banned from working with Chinese scientists.." Just like NASA was. Until China landed on the far side of the Moon, then NASA was interested in the data collected.
    1
  23288. "Banned from working with Chinese scientists.." Just like NASA.
    1
  23289. 笑死我了！
    1
  23290. Rupert Thornsberry So if the North Koreans describes themselves as democratic, calling themselves the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, does that mean that North Korea is democratic?
    1
  23291. Rupert Thornsberry So why you claim China is communist just because the government describes itself as such? And the communist party is not the only legal political party in China, there are 8 other legal political parties in China and they are: -Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang(RCCK)中国国民党革命委员会 (民革) -China Democratic League (CDL)中国民主同盟 (民盟) - China Democratic National Construction Association(CDNCA)中国民主建国会 (民建) -China Association for Promoting Democracy(CAPD)中国民主促进会 (民进) -Chinese Peasants' and Workers' Democratic Party(CPWDP)中国农工民主党 (农工党) -China Zhi Gong Party(CZGP)中国致公党 (致公党) -Jiusan Society (JS)九三学社 -Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League(TDSGL)台湾民主自治同盟 (台盟)12 So why do you claim that the only legal political party is the Chinese Communist Party?
    1
  23292. Rupert Thornsberry I've already disproved your first statement on this comment thread, where you claimed "Actually it's communism because their government describes themselves as communist and the only legal political party is the Chinese Communist Party." I've shown that just because NK describes itself as democracy, doesn't mean that it is democratic. And I've explicitly shown that there are 8 other legal political parties in China. So why'd you start calling me 50 cents, because I disproved your earlier statement?
    1
  23293. Rupert Thornsberry You said: "the only legal political party is the Chinese Communist Party." so why are you changing it word to mean legitimate? I have explicitly shown that there are at 8 other political parties and they are all legal by law. You clearly said: " it's communism because their government describes themselves as communist " and now you are claiming the government is closest to a facist? Is it because the government describes itself as such or what? Why do you claim Chinese people in mainland China do not have access to Google products? Chinese people can always use VPN to access Western Websites like Google, Youtube, Facebook, etc. So you mean I am a 50 cent because I am accessing Youtube? What sort of logic is that at all?
    1
  23294. +Rupert Thornsberry Despite being subservient to the Chinese Communist Party, they are still legally allowed to exist, so why'd you claim the only legal political party is the Chinese Communist Party? Yes, you did mention all that, but in the end, those minor political parties are still legal parties aren't they? I've already shown that governments can describe themselves as such and such, like when NK describes itself as democratic, so again, how can you claim China is communism because the government describes themselves as such? Its like US government describing itself as democratic, when it is is not. And you were the one who made the statement "Actually it's communism because their government describes themselves as communist..." so now you are changing your stance to mean fascist instead? And again, why am I being labelled as 50 cent, just for simply accessing Youtube? What is the logic behind your accusation at all?
    1
  23295. Netanyahu wasn't even that popular before Oct 7, having been involved in corruption charges. Perhaps he's now trying to further distract people by invading Gaza.
    1
  23296.  @johnsonli6467  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  23297.  @johnsonli6467  "神州 Shenzhou why dont u say ussr support ccp while us didn't supoort kmt?" The Soviet Union Union supported the communists, but so had the U.S initially supported KMT with miltary aid. But KMT corruption was widespread among the KMT, and they pocketed some 750,000,000 dollars worth of U.S aid, so much such that the then U.S President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves". So the U.S eventually cut off funding to the KMT.
    1
  23298.  @jeremytine  Let's take the Japanese out of the picture then. After the Imperial Japanese surrendered in 1945 at the end of WW2, the communists had a strength of 1.2 million (regular) plus 2.6 million (militia) (July 1945). Whereas the KMT had a strength of 2 million (regular) plus 2.3 million (militia) (June 1946) so the KMT still outnumber the communists whether you count regular troops or total strength. Figures were taken from Wikipedia: Chinese Civil War wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Civil_War Yet despite this numerical superiority, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China.
    1
  23299.  @zilun  Taiwan was under authoritarian, single-party Kuomintang for more than half its life! The KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist, and Jiang Jieshi jailed and executed his political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror 白色恐怖 and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT leadership, Taiwan flourished, resulting in Taiwan Miracle 台灣奇蹟. Between 1952 and 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 and 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan's GDP grew by 360% between 1965 and 1986 and the percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 and 1986. Only when democracy was introduced, did economic growth became more modest in 1990s. Today Taiwan's economy is in a slump, wages are stagnant, unemployment is high and Taiwan graduates are seeking employment opportunities elsewhere, in the mainland or in Singapore. Because democracy has weakened Taiwan leadership and resulted in more partisan disagreements on policy matters. Video: How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents youtube.com/watch?v=P3BCnPb8qHY So why continue to support democracy then? Taiwan prospered rapidly under KMT dictatorship, so if it works, why fix it? Because Westerners say so?
    1
  23300.  @zilun  It's because those countries are under authoritarian leadership, that's why they can experience economic growth. Once you implement democracy, you start wasting resources, wasting time, and the leaders you elect are chosen based on "popularity" not "competence". Look at President Trump and he has zero political experience yet the Americans choose to elect him to guide their country?
    1
  23301.  @zilun  The KMT in Taiwan was forced to introduce political reforms because of American pressure. After the murder of Henry Liu, the American government demanded Taiwan to do some serious reform, otherwise the United States would cut off arms sale to Taiwan, so Taiwan's leaders had little choice but to impose democratic reforms. And look at how much Taiwan suffered after introducing democracy. Taiwan's economy is in a slump, its wages are stagnant, high unemployment, and Taiwan graduates can't find jobs so they seek jobs elsewhere, in the mainland or in places like Singapore. Because the mainland continued under authoritarianism after Taiwan democracy, China today is world's 2nd largest economy, the manufacturing hub of the world, having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd largest military budget, and China has strong global presence as well as being influential player of world politics. Video: China - Hell March - the largest army in the world youtube.com/watch?v=5Xuqa1xKxOs Whereas, Taiwan's economy is ranked number 21st, its manufacturing jobs have but all been outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' use to be commonplace, not its replaced by 'Made in China'), its military is unable to retake the mainland. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence on the world today.
    1
  23302.  @zilun  Why don't you enlighten me on Trump's accomplishments? Did he succeed with his Wall at the US-Mexico border? Throughout human history, authoritarianism and oligarchy were commonplace and accepted methods of ruling. Political power was often concentrated not in the hands of the masses, but the few elites, which could be nobles (aristocracy), priests (theocracy), or kings and emperors (monarchs) Such systems were popular because they were stable and simply because they worked! The elites were oftentimes well-educated and politically savvy to make important decisions regarding the country's future, and the ignorant, uneducated masses were kept separate from politics. So how is this authoritarianism method weak, when it was popular throughout the ancient world? Democracy has a long history of failure. Athenian Democracy failed, Spartan Democracy failed, Greek Democracy failed, and even Republic of Rome fell. All these proto-democracies didn't succeed and democracy was unpopular outside of Greece. And in modern times, modern Western democracy only has a history of 200-300 years, so it does not necessarily mean it will be successful. Even 'democratic' Rome fell and the fragments of Roman empire adopted authoritarianism and monarchy to survive.
    1
  23303.  @zilun  What makes you think America was reluctant to sell Taiwan arms to prevent unprovoked attack by KMT on the mainland? Look, even today, America is clearly selling tonnes of weapons to Taiwan, so your reasoning does not hold weight. America clearly wants to divide China (to prevent us from getting too strong) and it is clearly using Taiwan as a puppet against China in this regard. America threatened to cut off weapons to Taiwan because Taiwan refused to adopt democratic reforms and that's why in the end Taiwan was pressured to adopt democracy or risk losing US military aid. And look, the KMT was the one who did all the hard work modernizing Taiwan over the years, developing its foundations and economy. But because of democracy, the people of Taiwan choose to elect another political party, the DPP, which was a green and inexperience political party into power, and topple the politically experienced KMT from power. Why choose some new and inexperienced political party as your leader? Recently, there was even a fight breaking out in Taiwan parlament, with politicians throwing waterbombs and even furniture at each other. Video: Taiwanese parliament broke out into a water balloon and chair-throwing brawl youtube.com/watch?v=mMvkusAI9DM The DPP is clearly not the battle-hardened, politically experienced KMT of the past, so how can you trust them to guide Taiwan? If war were to break out, can the people of Taiwan really trust this DPP to guide their armies, instead of the battle-experienced KMT?
    1
  23304.  @OlJackBurton  That's just how Confucian society is. To Westerners it may appear backward, but Confucian principles has served Chinese civilization for thousands of years, and has become intrinsic to Chinese culture. As for the younger folk, from what I understand, their complaints stem not from a lack of money to buy necessities, but from the logistical difficulties of distributing food across the 26 million population city. And lastly, let's not forget that earlier China's transformation from a dirt-poor country into economic juggernaut was built upon the backs of our elderly.
    1
  23305.  @dagsmoko3889  You said: "But the ccp insists China is already prosperous." Did the CPC said that? The Communist Party of China insisted that China is a developing country, when did they ever said China is already prosperous?
    1
  23306. You called him the President of the Republic of China? That's means you acknowledge that Taiwan is province of China after all.
    1
  23307.  @cz287cj  Yeah, it's PRC that is recognized by majority of countries in the world. Just recently Nauru severed its diplomatic ties with ROC and switched its recognition of China to the PRC.
    1
  23308.  @cz287cj  Both ROC and PRC agree that Taiwan is a province of China, under the One China policy. Both reject the notion of an independent Taiwan.
    1
  23309.  @Blaze6432  But countries all over the world receive far more mainland Chinese tourists than tourists from Taiwan. Everyone has heard of mainland Chinese tourists visiting their lands, and China's Renminbi is gradually becoming accepted internationally. Who wants Taiwanese Dollars?
    1
  23310.  @jaames  Even the UN recognizes PRC as China in the UN Security Council in 1971 and they kicked Taiwan out of the UN.
    1
  23311. I agree with your first statement, but not with your last statement. China has found a governing system that works for China. Then is there really a need to "transit to Democracy"? I mean, look at Biden, Trump, Harris and why would China want to emulate the same system as the US?
    1
  23312. China has found a governing system that works for China, then why should China "transit to Democracy" ? Look at the state of that system in the USA today, and why should China be trying to emulate that? China is forging ahead with its own path to success, instead of just blindly following the West.
    1
  23313. China has found a system that works for China, then why is there a need to "transit to Democracy"? Not all countries have to adopt Western-style democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. China should forge ahead with our own path to success, not just blindly following the West.
    1
  23314. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my There is literally no Japanese space station to compare with the Chinese space station, yet you're claiming Japanese have superior genetics?
    1
  23315. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my So Japan cannot launch a space station into orbit like China can, nor have they landed on Mars like China has, yet you think China cannot compete because the Japanese made a mechanical pencil?
    1
  23316. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my Japan hasn't launch a space station into orbit like China can, nor have they landed on Mars like China has, yet you think China cannot compete because of a mechanical pencil?
    1
  23317. @@TRUTHEXPRESS-qc6my More countries have built computer chips than have launched space stations into orbit, so it definitely isn't easier.
    1
  23318.  City Wok Guy  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  23319. "It's just too bad it has to be the current thugs and thieves ruling with a strong arm at the moment. " Although there were initial mistakes and it wasn't all smooth flowing, under CCP guidance, China's population growth doubled, our lifespans doubled, our life expectancy doubled, starvation and poverty fell and our literacy rates increased. China was once a dirt-poor country like India in the past, but according to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India Source: china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm
    1
  23320. That's why U.S is banning chips to China in an attempt to contain China's rise.
    1
  23321. The Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of being overrun by Asians) mindset is fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the west towards China.
    1
  23322. It's the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of being overrun by Asians) at work.
    1
  23323. It's the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (phobia of being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown accustomed to Western dominance, so much such that the rise of China frightens them so.
    1
  23324.  @weiyang6417  Genocide? China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  23325. @Leadingbrandz Tibet is part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty China. And Tibet's population actually tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people in Tibet today, so what genocide are you talking about?
    1
  23326.  @gt5228z  "USA has a huge trade deficit with China." China imports $120 billion from USA, while USA imports $540 billion from China right? It just means Chinese isn't all that interested in American goods, while Americans buy more Chinese goods. How is it China's fault then? Why aren't American goods more attractive? For example, Huawei overtook Apple as world's 2nd largest smartphone maker, only behind Samsung. that means more people in the world own Huawei phone than an Apple iPhone. Source: Huawei beats Apple to become second-largest smartphone maker theguardian.com/technology/2018/aug/01/huawei-beats-apple-smartphone-manufacturer-samsung-iphone So it just means Chinese aren't all that interested in American goods, and can you blame us?
    1
  23327.  @Alpha1598753  The world came closest to a nuclear war during the Cold War, which was at that time, a bipolar world divided between USA and the former Soviet Union. The USSR dissolved in 1990, creating a unipolar world with no other power to keep the remaining power in check. The rise of China, Russia and BRICS is giving birth to the multipolar world to bring balance to the world.
    1
  23328.  @Alpha1598753  Unlike the Soviet states within USSR, the BRICS is not characterized by collective decision-making nor the practice of overtly endorsing or censuring each other’s foreign policies. At its core, BRICS is a coalition oriented towards fostering mutually beneficial partnerships, primarily within the realms of the economy and trade. BRICS also maintains a strong commitment to non-interference in each other’s domestic affairs, allowing member nations the autonomy to pursue their individual objectives without the need for collective approval or judgment. In short, BRICS is quite possibly a "microcosm" of what a multipolar world should look like.
    1
  23329.  @Alpha1598753  BRICS is not characterized by collective decision-making nor the practice of overtly endorsing of each other’s foreign policies. At its core, BRICS is a coalition oriented towards fostering mutually beneficial partnerships, primarily within the realms of the economy and trade. BRICS also maintains a strong commitment to non-interference in each other’s domestic affairs, allowing member nations the autonomy to pursue their individual objectives without the need for collective approval or judgment. In short, BRICS is quite possibly a "microcosm" of what a multipolar world should look like.
    1
  23330.  @Alpha1598753  Unlike the USSR, BRICS is, at its core, a coalition oriented towards fostering mutually beneficial partnerships, primarily within the realms of the economy and trade. BRICS also maintains a strong commitment to non-interference in each other’s domestic affairs, allowing member nations the autonomy to pursue their individual objectives without the need for collective approval or judgment. In short, BRICS is quite possibly a "microcosm" of what a multipolar world should look like.
    1
  23331.  @Alpha1598753  Unlike the USSR, BRICS is not characterized by collective decision-making nor the practice of overtly endorsing of each other’s foreign policies. At it's core, it is a coalition oriented towards fostering mutually beneficial partnerships, primarily within the realms of the economy and trade. It also maintains a strong commitment to non-interference in each other’s domestic affairs, allowing member nations the autonomy to pursue their individual objectives without the need for collective approval or judgment. In short, it is quite possibly a "microcosm" of what a multipolar world should look like.
    1
  23332.  @Alpha1598753  Unlike the USSR, BRICS is not characterized by collective decision-making nor the practice of overtly endorsing of each other’s foreign policies. At it's core, BRICS is oriented towards fostering mutually beneficial partnerships, primarily within the realms of the economy and trade, while also maintaining a strong commitment to non-interference in each other’s domestic affairs. In short, BRICS is quite possibly a "microcosm" of what a multipolar world should look like.
    1
  23333.  @Alpha1598753  Unlike the USSR, BRICS is not characterized by collective decision-making nor the practice of overtly endorsing of each other’s foreign policies. At its core, BRICS is a coalition oriented towards fostering mutually beneficial partnerships, primarily within the realms of the economy and trade. BRICS also maintains a strong commitment to non-interference in each other’s domestic affairs, allowing member nations the autonomy to pursue their individual goals without the need for collective approval. In short, BRICS is quite possibly a "microcosm" of what a multipolar world should look like.
    1
  23334.  @Alpha1598753  BRICS is NOT the USSR. Unlike the USSR, BRICS is not characterized by collective decision-making nor the practice of overtly endorsing of each other’s foreign policies. At its core, BRICS is a coalition oriented towards fostering mutually beneficial partnerships, primarily within the realms of the economy and trade. BRICS also maintains a strong commitment to non-interference in each other’s domestic affairs, allowing member nations the autonomy to pursue their individual goals without the need for collective approval. In short, BRICS is quite possibly a "microcosm" of what a multipolar world should look like.
    1
  23335. As the world's 2nd largest economy, if China's economy collapse then the rest of the world will be sent into economic recession, including the USA, so isn't it in the best interests of other countries to keep China's economy going?
    1
  23336. Chris Song The previous failed negotiations were with Kim Jung il (current DPRK leader's father) Since the son took over after his father's death, there hasn't been any negotiations yet. Who knows if the son will behave differently on the negotiation table this time?
    1
  23337. USA speciality is military power, so attacking US head on should be a last resort. Instead, China should focus on "economic" attack, such as developing alternative to the petrol dollar and expanding influence by developing other less developed countries.
    1
  23338. +kelly hu Chinese government may have internal corruption problems, but at least the communist party is making attempts to curb corruption. But is Indian government or even American government doing anything about corruption? For example, I believe Hilary Clinton is corrupt politician, but US federal authorities aren't doing anything about it. What about President Trump promising during his campaign to release his tax details upon assuming office, but hasn't done so far? Just because they are democracy, doesn't mean that they won't be corrupted. Just look at corruption in Indian government for example.
    1
  23339. +kelly hu As far as I know, the Chinese communist party is world's largest political entity so obviously it's going to be have greater numbers of corruption cases proportionally due to its size. It is unrealistic to expect such big party to have low corruption. Previous leaders like Hu Jintao have remarked about corruption but it was president Xi Jinping that decided to actively work on corruption crackdown. Already at the top levels corrupted CPC members (nicknamed "tigers") are being taken down I mean, given the choice, isn't having anti-corruption crackdown better than NOT having such crackdown in first place. When's the last time other countries like USA or India had a public crackdown on corruption?
    1
  23340. +kelly hu Exactly where did you obtain your figures at all? You think such large political entity like the communist party is immune to corruption? You claim Chinese leaders are suspicious, then who do you expect to replace them? You think China should just change our government because of corruption issues that every nation in the world has to grapple with? One party system or multi party systems doesn't automatically mean corruption will be absent. Look at India, world's largest democracy and it too, has corruption in the government, regardless of single party or not, so what has China abolishing single party doesn't equal no corruption. You don't even look at corruption in the real world, and you somehow think changing entire political system will get rid of corruption? Which democracy right now is actively having anti corruption campaign here? USA? India? Edit: Some of the corrupt officials have migrated to other countries, but the government is also making efforts to catch people overseas like in Australia. Which other government in the world is dedicated to pursuing corrupt officials overseas?
    1
  23341. +kelly hu So exactly who do you think is capable of replacing Chinese government leadership? What guarantee that these people will be "honest and trustworthy" or that their leadership will prove better than the current leaders? Do they have the experience of governing a country of 1.4 billion people, as CPC did for over 60 years? And this independent third party, how qualified are they to investigate suspicious corruptions? Take the US two-party system for example, and Trump said during his campaign that Hilary Clinton will be "going to jail" for her corruption. But is Hilary Clinton in jail? What happened to the ongoing investigations into Clinton's corrupt practices? Even when Trump became most powerful man in USA, and having power over Clinton, nothing is being done this corruption case. Lastly, nobody in this thread is claiming CPC as the greatest, purest and most correct party. Everyone here has admitted that CPC is imperfect and has corruption, but at least active corruption campaigns are ongoing, and even if the corrupt official escape overseas, the CPC has demonstrated willingness to exert influence overseas to bring corrupt officials to justice, in which NO other governments (as far as I know) seem willing to do. It is idealistic to think that corruption can be simply stamped out 100% in this world. Changing China's One-Party dominance does not equal to zero corruption, as other existing democracies have shown, such as India, USA, etc. Even in ROC there is corruption charges against Chen Shui Bian 陳水扁 in 2008 even when Taiwan has Multi-Party system, so why do you think changing China's constitution will result in no corruption? Where is your proof altogether that Two-Party or Multiparty is better than Single-party? To summarize, people like you only think of Step One (Get rid of CPC), but not Step Two (Who is qualified to replace CPC?) You only interested in short-term gains, but ignore long-term benefits. China is strong, both militarily and economically, thanks to CPC's efforts, so why should China get rid of our government when China is still progressing today?
    1
  23342. +kelly hu Excuse me, but Singapore has been governed by an authoritative single-party government for its entire life. The PAP is Singapore's longest (and only ever) ruling party for over 50 years, since Singapore's founding as a nation in 1965, so why do you even consider Singapore to be multi-party? Do you even understand Singapore's politics correctly? In Singapore, it is technically illegal for people to gather in groups of more than 4 people, because it can be classified as "illegal assembly." So how is this any much different from the way Chinese government runs the country? Besides Singapore, "democratic" Taiwan has also been under single-party authoritative rule for much of its lifetime by KMT. Even South Korea was once under a dictatorship (Park Chung Hee). But the common thing is that under single-party rule, our countries progressed and developed rapidly because of a stable long term government. Because of this, our countries are known as the "Four Asian Tigers". Only after Taiwan become democratic, leading to creation of DPP as opposition party, did Taiwan's economy began to slow down significantly. You have no idea who can replace CPC? Then the way you argue your points is similar to those SJWs, who argue for the sake of arguing, without any actual knowledge of the situation. You are just arguing to make yourself "feel good" that's all, when you actually have NO solution at all for the problem. Like I said, people like you only think of Step 1 (address the wrong) but you don't think at all about Step 2 (Where does China go from here?) You think short term, not long term. If you noticed, governments like CPC and PAP have the advantage of long-term governance over the country (60+ years for CPC, 50+ years for PAP) and because of this, our countries are able to make long-term plans spanning 10 or more years, rather than short term plans. In USA, the government only makes short term plans for up to 4-8 years only, because there is no guarantee that they will remain in power for more than a decade. But countries like China is constantly coming up with 5 year plans, 10 year plans and even 20 year plans, because our governments are expected to remain in power. Why should our countries change what appears to be a successful formula for governance? Because Westerners say it is "undemocratic"? Nobody says that every country has to follow Western democracy to be successful, and China is living proof of this. Today, China is world's 2nd largest economy, with world's 2nd largest military spending, protected by world's largest land army, the PLA, and China is also helping to develop other countries by building infrastructure in countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh as well as African countries like Nigeria, Angola, Kenya, etc, etc.
    1
  23343. +kelly hu Whether elected or not, that doesn't change the fact that Singapore is governed by one party for over 50 years, just like China. Also, the current Singapore President, Halimah Yacob, wasn't elected by Singapore citizens, because no other candidate opposed her at the presidency polls. As for corruption comparison, do you even notice the size of the CPC, as compared to Singapore's PAP? What makes you think the communist party is capable of achieving the same lack of corruption levels as PAP, when CPC is world's largest political entity? Look at India's government, the world's largest democracy, and do you think there is no corruption there? Look at India having multi-party government, but being plagued with corruption. I mean, are you even living in the same planet here? Or are you just spouting off your mouth without verifying the reality of the situation? Since we don't know who will replace CPC if general elections were held in China, lets say for example that some other party took over China's government. Then how would you know if they will be trustworthy and incorruptible? How would we know if they are capable of governing a country as vast as China, with a population of 1.4 billion people? Chinese government will lose control over our long term plans, like the Pakistan Economic Corridor, and the Belt and Road Initiative, because the next party might not want to support it. Look at USA for example, when President Obama been planning the Trans Pacific Partnership deal for 8 years, but when President Trump took over, he cancelled TPP, simply because he didn't like Obama (Obama humiliated him with his birth certificate) So why should China introduce this multi-party system, where the parties constantly oppose each other for their own interest, instead of the country's interest? Like I said, your behavior matches that of SJWs, disconnected from reality, who simply argue about problems, without any proper understanding of the real world issues. You believe in idealistic scenarios only, but care nothing about the consequences. For example, you claim no one is irreplaceable, so what would happen if say, the US government disappears? There would be chaos, anarchy, wars, economic repression, etc, possibly even nuclear war as well. USA may never recover, or USA may recover slowly and will have to start all over again to work its way back to its former glory. So why should China do that? Simply because you claim no one is irreplaceable? If the government allows that, then Tibet will want its own independent government, then maybe Xinjiang as well, then Hong Kong will push for independence, and no one will stop Taiwan from declare independence. So isn't China doomed to break up into many smaller countries (like the collapse of the Soviet Union) if China doesn't have the strong central government we have today?
    1
  23344. +kelly hu No one force you to argue if you don't want to. I only pointed various inconsistencies in your argument alone, and you start suspecting me of being Communist Party member? I have shown that other multi-party systems like India, is equally corrupted, so it doesn't mean that disposing of dictatorship will get rid of corruption. I have also shown how a single-party dictatorship, like PAP ruling Singapore for its entire life, is successful because it can make long-term plans instead of short-term. So why can't China stick with single party system and focus on purging corruption internally, instead of adopting multi party systems? In my opinion, politics should be about doing what's right not what's popular. Sometimes the popular thing may not be right, and the right thing may not be popular. Democracy is only about doing what's popular, but not necessarily what's right.
    1
  23345. kelly hu If you are really so interested in knowing President Xi's income, then you can search for the salaries of major world leaders. President Xi Jinping's salary is only $22,000. even lower than Indian PM Narendra Modi's $30,300. Russian President Vladimir Putin is paid $136,00 a year, while Obama's was $400,000 annually. But Singapore's Lee Hsien Loong is paid a whopping $1,700,000!
    1
  23346. I have made my personal stance very clear, that countries should strive to do what's right, not what's popular. Having a multi-party system, doesn't mean that corruption will go away, as in the case of India. But you refuse to look at India at all, because doing so will dismantle your entire argument completely. You already appear to have poor (or a simplistic) grasp of politics, so how can you be qualified to write about the realities of political conditions nowadays? You don't even know today's political realities well enough, so how can you even begin to argue your case here at all?
    1
  23347. kelly hu Exactly what knowledge of politics have you even displayed at all? You supplied no actual real world examples, and you spout the usual SJW nonsense, like "All men are equal" or "Rise up against oppression" or "don't defend decaying dictatorship" etc, etc. Chinese leaders change hands after every few years, and China has about 7 leaders, from Mao Zedong to Deng Xiaoping to Xi Jinping today. So why would you consider China a dictatorship at all? The older, hardcore CPC members are slowly dying off and retiring, while younger, Western-educated CPC members are taking up the mantle of leadership. Our political change is slow and controlled, not sudden and instanteous, like when Trump took over from Obama. You don't even consider other countries politics, so again why you think that China should follow other countries systems? Just because Westerners think their system is the best? Every system has its flaws, including China's, but that does not mean China has to emulate the West. So India is corrupted because of hierarchy, but China is corrupted because of One Party system? Then why Singapore's one party system is has low corruption, despite PAP ruling Singapore its entire life?
    1
  23348. +kelly hu I have read your post carefully and NOT ONCE was "dictatorship" even mentioned at all in your post, so why do you still label Chinese government a dictatorship then? As for Singapore, you are the one who brought up Singapore first, so why can't I mention it as well? According to your source, both PRC and Singapore are still classified as One Party States, isn't it? Why do you apply double standards between your arguments and mine here?
    1
  23349. +kelly hu So doesn't Singapore share the same definition of dictatorship as well? PAP also oppress dissidents like Amos Yee and jail him for speaking out about Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore's founder) I mean, where are your real world examples at all? All you done is quote textbook definitions constantly. Your words are idealistic in nature because such definitions do not always apply to the real world. Why keep on spouting all these SJW nonsense instead of bringing up some real world examples? India is perfect example of multiparty system that is still corrupted, so what makes you think that China won't be corrupted by introducing multi party system? You don't even understand political realities in other countries, so what makes you qualified to talk about Chinese politics? Using textbook definitions alone?
    1
  23350. kelly hu Firstly, Who is the one calling me "a defender of decayed dictator" here? I compared your behavior to that of SJWs, because such people are idealistic in nature and attempt to apply textbook definitions to real life. For example, you mention China is oligarchy, but if you search online for The World's 5 Most Powerful Oligarchies, they are India, Britain, Russia, China and USA. So what's the point of oligarchy, communism and democracy? Secondly, you tell me not to use other countries' problems, then why'd you brought up Singapore later in your paragraph? Why are you applying unfair double standards between you and me, regarding using other countries as example? You are the one brought up Singapore, then why can't I bring up other countries as well? Thirdly, more of your "textbook" examples? Nobody is interested in textbook definitions because the real world is not like your imaginary and ideal world described in your example. USA blames China for cheating, India blames China the same and likewise China will do the same to other countries when you target us. Fourthly, why you can talk about Singapore, but I can't mention other countries? Why the double standards here? Also, have you compared the size of Singapore's PAP against the largest political party in the world, the Communist Party of China? Its much easier to handle corruption in small party, compared to large party isn't it? Lastly, since you said, no one can guarantee that multiparty system has zero corruption, then why should we adopt it then? Why risk it if it not guaranteed successful? I already mentioned previously, that if CPC allows another party, then Taiwan, Hong Kong, Tibet, Xinjiang will want to declare independence too. China will become divided, like the Soviet Union Collapse, and no longer as powerful as before. Example: Look at British India, being partitioned into India and Pakistan, and then later Bangladesh being created. A country is strong if united and weak when divided. British India would be supremely powerful if left unpartitioned when British left, but each separation weakens the original country. So why should China do that? I mean, I draw upon many real-world examples to compare with China to support my points, but all you do is regurgitate textbook definitions and apply idealistic solutions without caring for the consequences. Why don't you get your head out of the textbook and look at real-world political realities instead?
    1
  23351. +kelly hu Treated unfairly? Don't you see how you keep telling me not to bring up other countries, whereas you can constantly bring up Singapore? Who is treating others unfairly here? Why is it you can criticize China, but I can't defend China and critic other countries as well? Are other countries somehow immune to criticism, but not China? If I proved others wrong using logic and examples, such as Singapore being ruled by PAP its entire life, and about India being multi-party system, but equally corrupted, then what's wrong with that? I did use logic and examples to prove my point, not like you who use "textbook definitions" that's all. Did you find out who the world's 5 most powerful oligarchies are? What makes you think that USA, India, UK are all truly democratic? Even throughout history, people have been traditionally ruled by a minority, whether it is monarchy (ruled by king), aristocracy (ruled by noblemen) or theocracy (ruled by priests). Rome had some form of democracy, but in the end, Rome succumbed to barbarians, when its provinces decide to break apart. China has 5000 years of history, and one of world's oldest "continuous" civilizations alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Egypt and Rome have faded to historical textbooks. If China survived 5000 years without implementing democracy, then why is there a sudden need to implement it then? Because the Westerners say so? Look at what happen to Rome after few thousand years. Like I said before, politics should be about doing what's right not what's popular. What's popular may not be right and what's right may not be popular. The One-Child policy is an example of unpopular policy, but if it wasn't implemented in 1970s, then China today would be possibly be overwhelmed by our population, with insufficient resources to sustain everyone and insufficient schools for all those children born. Example: Look at India today, and you can see that it is overpopulated. Not enough food to feed every newborn (high malnutrition rates) and not enough schools for all its children (Indian literacy rate is 72%, compared to China's 96% literacy rate) If China didn't have population control back then, it is likely China's situation would have ended up like India's today. That's why I keep saying SJWs only know idealistic notions learned from their textbooks that's all. Buts its a totally different story outside of school. What's the point of democratic voting, if 25% of your population is illiterate, as in the case of India? How can you expect such people to make the right choice during voting if they didn't graduate from school? You just blindly apply your idealistic beliefs to society and not caring about the consequences that's all, just like those SJWs who somehow think they know how to solve all the world's problems by themselves.
    1
  23352.  @jp95js  The Western anti-China propaganda is pushing their audiences to manufacture consent for war with China. The Barretts, Jayoe Nation, Jason, Gweilo 60, Cyrus Janssen are actually helping promote peace and understanding about China in order to avoid war (which we all know is bad for everyone in the world) and that's what these channels are striving to achieve. If you are comparing them to "Hitler's NAZI Party sycophants" then why is that none of their channels promote war like what Nazi propaganda did? Those channels are doing the reverse of what you are claiming, they're promoting peace and understanding of China, not war.
    1
  23353.  @jackbent4211  You sound like Trump when he suggested "injecting disinfectants" into the body in order to cure the coronavirus.
    1
  23354.  @keithkululu2  Hong Kong was taken from China by the British, and wasn't fully-returned. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  23355. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  23356. Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23357. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23358. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  23359. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  23360. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  23361. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its own constitution.
    1
  23362. Perhaps Russian's response to the shelling of Zaporizhzhia is to shutdown the nuclear power plant altogether.
    1
  23363. ASEAN still refuses to recognize the Myanmar military government and instead continues to follow the Western MSM narratives regarding Myanmmar.
    1
  23364.  @steveman888  One of ASEAN's founding principles is of non-interference in its members internal affairs. ASEAN members shall refrain from cristicing the actions of the government of member states towards its own people. Myanmar is a member of ASEAN so the government of Myanmar deserves its seat at the table.
    1
  23365. China is building connections through infrastructure, while the US is sowing division through building military bases.
    1
  23366. +William Hou China is home to the world's longest range ICBM, with an operational range between 12,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the range of the US LGM-30 Minuteman which has a reported range of 13,000 km. China missile tests DF-41 launch from railroad train Video: youtube.com/watch?v=h2kjMctT8yU&t=13
    1
  23367.  @Rusty571000  Is it really that unbelievable to you that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China? The figure comes from a joint survey by Harvard University and Ash Centre. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    1
  23368.  @Rusty571000  Many Chinese found that our quality of life has vastly improved under the communist party. Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  23369.  Beast Mode  If the U.S considers Latin America their backyard, then why the U.S deems it okay to encroach on Chinese territory in the South China Sea Islands? Wouldn't that be China's "backyard" in that sense?
    1
  23370.  @sneedmcfeed270  How were Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein a threat to global stability? Is it because Gaddafi wanted to introduce a gold-backed African currency? Or because Saddam Hussein had alleged WMDs? Well, where are those WMDs?
    1
  23371.  @sneedmcfeed270  Is it because Gaddafi wanted to introduce a gold-backed African currency to compete with the Dollar, and because Saddam Hussein allegedly had "weapons of mass destruction", that they were a threat to global peace and stability?
    1
  23372.  @sneedmcfeed270  Is it because Gaddafi wanted to introduce a gold-backed African currency to compete with the Dollar that he was a threat to global peace and stablity? Where are those WMDs that Saddam Hussein allegedly have?
    1
  23373.  @sneedmcfeed270  Is it because Gaddafi wanted to introduce a gold-backed African currency to compete with the Dollar that he was a threat to global peace and stablity? Where were those WMDs BTW?
    1
  23374. ​@Sneed McFeed Is it because Gaddafi wanted to introduce a gold-backed African currency to compete with the Dollar, and because Saddam Hussein allegedly had "weapons of mass destruction", that they were a threat to global peace and stability?
    1
  23375.  @sneedmcfeed270  How were Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein a threat to global peace and stability? You're the one acting as if the U.S is on the high moral ground.
    1
  23376.  @sneedmcfeed270  Is it because Gaddafi wanted to introduce a gold-backed African currency to compete with the Dollar that he was a threat to global peace and stablity?
    1
  23377.  @GustavoSouza-gf6ty  You said: "Their gentilic "American" is a redundancy because everyone born on the American continent is American." So what would you call the citizens of the United States, if not Americans? Also, you need not be born on the American continent to be considered American. For example, you can be born on Hawaii in the Pacific Ocean and still be considered American, despite not being born on that continent.
    1
  23378.  @GustavoSouza-gf6ty  You asked: "If there is a country called Asia on the Asian continent, would a Chinese, Japanese or Thai cease to be Asian?" There's a difference between being American and being Asian. Being Asian is a race, while being American is a nationality. Chinese, Japanese, and Thai are considered Asians because it's a race in and of itself. You don't cease being Asian just because you are Chinese, Japanese or Thai.
    1
  23379. It's also because more countries in the Global South are beginning to see through the hypocrisy of the Global North especially regarding Gaza. The unipolar world is dying while the multipolar world is being born.
    1
  23380. It's also because more countries in the Global South are beginning to see through the hypocrisy of the Global North especially regarding Gaza.
    1
  23381. It's also because more countries in the Global South are beginning to see through the hypocrisy of the Global North
    1
  23382.  @danfisher7458  "more information to read than video playtime" As the saying goes, a picture paints a thousand words. A video multiples that even more.
    1
  23383.  @mnbr6884  "神州 Shenzhou You're deflecting. The point is SEA had no say during the post war territorial negotiations" I have been talking about South East Asian countries all this time, how's that deflecting? I pointed out that North Vietnam PM Pham Van Dong's diplomatic letter, you just said: "神州 Shenzhou That's 1958 and only one country." Yet when I introduced Philippines' stance and that the Spratly Islands were not Philippine territory as per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America, now you claim: "神州 Shenzhou You're deflecting."? It's clear that you're unable to counter my points, so you come up with one excuse after another to dismiss my points. I cite sources to support my arguments, whereas, you just dismiss them and make "speculations" that's all. You said: "Oh they did, did they. Funny how you side with the imperialists when it suits you." I pointed out what the Americans did, how's that siding with the imperialists? All you've seemingly done is made ad hominem attacks against me, instead of actually countering the points I brought up here.
    1
  23384. @UCr6cO4ViH0PpiNoLn4DyNBw You said: "You're flailing all over the place throwing s**t, hoping some will stick." How am I doing that? I brought up North Vietnam PM's diplomatic letter, your response was that was only "1 country". So I brought up Philippines and that Spratly wasn't part of Phillippines as per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America. Your response was to accuse me of deflecting. If anything, it looks like you're the one attempting to throw mud over my points here! You said: "Look, our whole debate here is on record. Anybody can read and judge for themselves." Exactly, I've cited articles to support my argument, whereas all you've done is dismiss my points and hurl accusations against me for my views. You said: "If they had sense at all, they'll see what I see." So are you implying people who don't see what you see have no sense at all?
    1
  23385. @UCr6cO4ViH0PpiNoLn4DyNBw You said: "You're flailing all over the place throwing shit, hoping some will stick." How am I doing that? I brought up North Vietnam PM's diplomatic letter, your response was that was only "1 country". So I brought up Philippines and that Spratly wasn't part of Phillippines as per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America. Your response was to accuse me of deflecting. If anything, it looks like you're the one attempting to throw mud over my points here! You said: "Look, our whole debate here is on record. Anybody can read and judge for themselves." Exactly, I've cited articles to support my argument, whereas all you've done is dismiss my points and hurl accusations against me for my views.
    1
  23386. @UCr6cO4ViH0PpiNoLn4DyNBw You said: "You're flailing all over the place throwing shit, hoping some will stick." How am I doing that? I brought up North Vietnam PM's diplomatic letter, your response was that was only "one country". So I brought up Philippines and your response was to accuse me of deflecting. If anything, it looks like you're the one attempting to throw mud over my points here!
    1
  23387. @UCr6cO4ViH0PpiNoLn4DyNBw "You're flailing all over the place throwing shit, hoping some will stick." How am I doing that? I brought up Vietnam, you said it was just one country. So I brought up Philippines next, you claim I'm deflecting! If anything, it looks as though you're the one trying to sling mud at me here for my views.
    1
  23388. @UCr6cO4ViH0PpiNoLn4DyNBw "You're flailing all over the place throwing shit, hoping some will stick." How am I doing that? I brought up Vietnam, you said it was just one country. So I brought up Philippines next, you claim I'm deflecting!
    1
  23389. @UCr6cO4ViH0PpiNoLn4DyNBw How am I doing that? I brought up Vietnam, you said it was just one country. So I brought up Philippines next, you claim I'm deflecting! if anything, it looks as though you're the one slinging mud here.
    1
  23390.  @mnbr6884  You said: "You're flailing all over the place throwing shit, hoping some will stick." How am I doing that? I brought up North Vietnam PM's diplomatic letter, your response was that was only "1 country". So I brought up Philippines and that Spratly wasn't part of Phillippines as per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America. Your response was to accuse me of deflecting. If anything, it looks like you're the one attempting to throw mud over my points here!
    1
  23391.  @mnbr6884  Flailing all over the place? I brought up Vietnam, you claim that's only 1 country. So I brought up Phillippines next, you claim I'm deflecting! If anything, it appears like you're the one slinging mud onto me for my views here!
    1
  23392. @UCr6cO4ViH0PpiNoLn4DyNBw You said: "Look, our whole debate here is on record. Anybody can read and judge for themselves." Exactly, I've cited articles to support my argument, whereas all you've done is dismiss my points and hurl accusations against me for my views.
    1
  23393.  @danfisher7458  Personally, I find it easier to explain myself using text, rather than posting a video. It's the reason why I continue to post comments, rather than post videos, I just don't think my videos will be as effective as my comments.
    1
  23394. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  23395. +Sutapas Bhattacharya Today, archaeology is always uncovering new evidence all the time. Did you know the Shang Dynasty (1600 BC) was once considered myth, until archaeology discovered a dig site in the 1920s filled with oracle bone script? Likewise, the Xia dynasty (2070 BC) is also considered myth but in 2016, a team of Chinese scientists uncovered evidence of a massive flood, in the form of skeletons of victims found crushed downstream, Scientific evidence of mythical great flood found in China cbc.ca/news/technology/china-ancient-flood-1.3708724 This goes to show that history is already updating itself as archaeology uncovers more evidence as time goes on. One day in the future, archaeologists will finally uncover all the truths behind China's 5000 years of history. As for the First Emperor of China, Qin Shihuangdi did gathered and destroyed many works which he regarded as subversive, 2 copies of each school were to be preserved in imperial libraries.
    1
  23396. +Mike Greiner Song Dynasty China was founded in 960 BCE which is almost 3,000 years ago, so where did you arrive at your figure of 3,200 years? At least I proved articles to support my points, but you can't refute my points so you resort to labeling me a propagandist instead?
    1
  23397. Mike Greiner I think we can all tell from your behavior who is the troll spamming comments here
    1
  23398. +Mike Greiner Why did you edit out your earlier comment and changed Song dynasty to Shang dynasty? And like I said, the Shang Dynasty was once considered myth in 19th century as well, but has been verified to have existed today. Likewise, the Xia dynasty is considered myth, but new archaeological evidence is slowly being revealed to prove that a flood did indeed happened (see my previous link) Also, when did I ever said China as a civilization is 5000 years old?
    1
  23399. I agree. China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  23400. Many Chinese warmly welcome foreigners to our lands as visitors. However, many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly treating Chinese in their lands as unwelcome.
    1
  23401. Russia and China are facilitating the global transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the U.S and its "allies".)
    1
  23402.  @chaospilot2142  Well, Taiwan was clearly part of China during the Qing Dynasty (see Qing Dynasty Map) so there might be some truth to your little joke.
    1
  23403.  @chaospilot2142  "神州 Shenzhou They fought against the Japanese and got weak during that" Alright, then lets take the Japanese out of the equation. After the 1945 Japanese WWII surrender, the communists had a strength of 1,200,000 (July 1945) whereas KMT had a strength of 4,300,000 (June 1946) so KMT clearly wasn't that weak and the KMT forces clearly outnumbered the communists by 3 times! Source: Chinese Civil War wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Civil_War Yet the KMT still lost the mainland to communists, despite their superior numerical advantage, and the fact that there was no more fighting the Japanese after their 1945 surrender? This demonstrates KMT sheer incompetence in their rule to govern China.
    1
  23404.  @rv8804  Hey, its every country's choice if they want to slap import tariffs on certain products. Like you said, German slaps a 15-20% tax on American cars, because they want Germans to buy German cars. Even South Korea has taxes on Apple iPhone, because they want to promote Korean Samsung, so what's the big deal? You want every country in the world to remove all their import taxes is that it?
    1
  23405.  @chaospilot2142  The West believes in "Free Market" which is likened to a wild, untamed river, flowing to and fro according to market forces. Would you let the river flow uncontrollably and cause widespread destruction to your markets? Because that's exactly what happens, when Western markets are flooded with Chinese goods and American companies are leaving the US for lower-wage countries like China and Vietnam, leaving American workers high and dry. Whereas China's approach is to "tame the river", to dam it and control it to minimise its destructive effects and maximise the benefits to China. New, fledgling Chinese companies would surely perish if exposed directly to global competition, so the government shields them and provides home advantage to give local Chinese companies an edge over the competition. Once our companies are strong enough, they can slowly start expanding globally. Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, ZTE, Lenovo, etc, are some examples of Chinese companies which have grown strong enough to venture outside of China and into foreign markets.
    1
  23406.  @chaospilot2142  said "Mainland was only a Rebellgroup who overtrow the real Rulers." The Kuomintang also overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty Manchu rulers of China back in 1912, so how are they the real rulers then? They obtained China the same way the communists did so why the double standards in "rightful" rulership?
    1
  23407.  @rv8804  Why don't you describe exactly what is "fair"? You keep on claiming unfair, unfair, unfair, then exactly what do you want? If you don't explain what you desire, then how is China going to accomodate your request you tell me?
    1
  23408.  @rv8804  Lets start with trade deficit imbalance. You said earlier that "$120.3 billion is how much china bought from the US. The US bought $539.5 billion from china." But how to solve this so called "imbalance"? Chinese people just aren't all that interested in American goods, so you want to force Chinese to buy your goods? How is this fair then you tell me? Didn't you see my earlier source about Huawei surpassing Apple as world's 2nd largest smartphone company? More people in the world own a Huawei phone as compared to iPhone so what do you want China to do about it then? I found the 2018 top smartphone brands and they are: 1. Samsung (South Korea) 2. Apple (American) 3. Huawei (Chinese) 4. Oppo (Chinese) 5. Xiaomi (Chinese) 6. LENOVO (Chinese) 7. LG (South Korean) 8. TCL Communication (Chinese) 9. ZTE (Chinese) 10. Micromax (Indian) Source: Top 10 Smartphone Brands in the World techzac.com/top-10-smartphone-manufacturers-in-the-world/ As you can see, people in the world (including Americans) are buying Chinese phones so that's one reason why USA has bought lots of Chinese goods. How to solve this then? You want China to lower the quality of our phones is that it? How is it China's fault our phones are just so good? Why don't you improve your brands instead?
    1
  23409.  @hgin7451  Previously, the Chinese swimming team did tested positive, but it was discovered domestically and the results were voluntarily announced to WADA. It turns out that the detected levels of substances are very much lower than the standard (almost negligible in fact). It was later discovered that it was food contamination, such as clenbuterol, and not a case of deliberate doping.
    1
  23410. Peking Opera has the actors' faces painted white, black, red and other colors too.
    1
  23411.  @relaxwhc  Are you looking down on learning another language, even if it's ancient Latin?
    1
  23412.  @zackk4393  But according to Wikipedia: A Madman's Diary, the diary form was inspired by Nikolai Gogol's short story "Diary of a Madman", as was the idea of the madman who sees reality more clearly than those around him. It's a work of fiction, not based on a true story.
    1
  23413.  @TheUncertainKill  According to Global Trade Alert, America is the world's most protectionist country having taken over 800 protectionist measures since 2008. European countries like Britain, German, France have taken over 300 of such protectionist measures, while China has only 200-300. Source: Protectionist measures taken 2008–2013 according to Global Trade Alert wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Protectionist_measures_taken_2008%e2%80%932013_according_to_Global_Trade_Alert.png So who is the most protectionist country in the world, if not the USA?
    1
  23414. Even the United States acknowledged that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23415. Meanwhile, Western journals continue to predict an economic hard landing for China. 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash. 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. NYT: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell RECESSION. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... But it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  23416.  @christopherhamlin6139  Western journalists have long been predicting China's economic collapse since 1990. Here's a compiled list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. 2021. Wall Street Journal: China’s Latest Challenge Is Engineering a Soft Landing for a Sputtering Economy ... But its already 2022, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western journalist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for 30 years already?
    1
  23417.  @christopherhamlin6139  Western journals have long been predicting China's economic collapse since 1990. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2022, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western journalist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for 30 years already?
    1
  23418.  @christopherhamlin6139  Western journals have long been predicting China's economy collapsing since 1990. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2022, and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  23419.  @christopherhamlin6139  I've already answered, I have no idea why you think the people of Vietnam love America after the Americans dropped Napalm bombs on Vietnamese villages and torched them to the ground. "Napalm Girl" was photographed fleeing her home after she had her clothes burnt off her back. The Americans sprayed chemical defoliants like Agent Orange, causing birth defects in Vietnamese children 40 years after the war, and the Americans left many unexploded ordinance in the form of landmines to unfortunate people to step on and lose life and limb.
    1
  23420.  @putianren  Back when China was still dirt-poor, weak, and starving country, many overseas Chinese and half-Chinese like Gordan Chang have been brought up feeling ashamed of their motherland. Now that China has grown stronger, instead of feeling a sense of pride in their homeland, they've been brought up by Western MSM to feel animosity towards their motherland and their heritage.
    1
  23421.  @christopherhamlin6139  "Who brainwashed the Vietnamese people to love the United States?" It's a result of the "colonial mentality" that makes people worship Anglo-Saxon culture while harboring disdain for anything "non-white". Even after what the Americans did to Vietnam, the minds of some Vietnamese remain conditioned to think of the West as their saviors, when they were in fact abandoned.
    1
  23422.  @Rubbersofree  Many experts believe China's economy is expected to surpass that of the United States some day in the foreseeable future.
    1
  23423.  @christopherhamlin6139  "神州 Shenzhou Do your parents know that you are chatting with strangers on the internet? What if they find out? Will they take your phone away?" You mean your parents are like that? Then you should be taking care with who you talk to.
    1
  23424.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "Unfortunately... unemployment is rising fast - and those hundreds of million who are being thrown back into poverty are not smiling." President Xi has eliminated extreme poverty in China, and China has not seen people falling back into poverty in large numbers in the first half of this year according to an official from the National Rural Revitalization Administration (NRRA). Xu Jianmin, an official from the NRRA, said that up to now, 65% of those monitored have eliminated the risk of returning to poverty, and support measures have been implemented to the rest 35%, and the risk of them returning to poverty will be eliminated following a period of hard work. You said: "Neither are those who lent Chinese companies and are losing their money by the tens of billion." Do you have actual figures to support your claims? You said: "Not forgetting those other million with their deposits/savings inaccessible, frozen by banks struggling to keep afloat." Who said there was a million with their deposits/savings frozen? In Zhengzhou, the number is only around 1,000 people that gathered to protest, yet you're just exaggerating the figure to 1 million? You said: "Topped by even more million citizens who paid for apartments they will never see while losing their life-time savings." Evergrande's EV unit has said it receives pre-orders for more than 37,000 units of its first model Hengchi 5. The electric vehicle (EV) unit of Evergrande started to accept non-binding pre-orders two weeks ago, with buyers paying 1,000 yuan ($148.13) as a deposit for the pure-electric sport-utility vehicle priced from 179,000 yuan. If this goes well, it could help recoup losses for the parent Evergrande Group to pay its debts. You said: "Add to it the massive relocation of companies and production to other safer friendlier countries and the bad debt from Chinese lending abroad.." China had overtaken the United States as the world's largest recipient of foreign direct investment (FDI) in 2020. China had brought in $163 billion in inflows, compared to $134 billion attracted by the U.S according to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Also, according to a report by the Green Finance & Development Center at Fudan University in Shanghai, 68 countries will pay China and its lenders almost $14 billion this year in debt servicing costs. You said: "The reality is Chinese economy is crumbling and at the edge of the abyss." You sound like those Western Journalists predicting a hard landing in China, yet never actually having gotten one out of China.
    1
  23425.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "Now, understand me: I do not wish bad to the Chinese, on the contrary." You've been wishing for China's economic collapse all this time, why pretend that you do not wish ill onto China? You said: "But all of what's happening is a direct consequence of Chinese government's mismanagement, corruption and abuse." Explain how is that so? It's government policies that are alleviating poverty in China and providing support so that people in China do not slip back into poverty. The government has no control over how much Chinese companies borrow from creditors, neither is the government responsible for how much other countries choose to borrow from Chinese banks, so how is the government responsible for this? Even regarding Evergrande, it's the citizens themselves who choose to invest in a second apartment and it's the property speculation that drove Evergrande into its current state. President Xi Jinping said: "Houses are for living in, not for speculation! (房子是用来住的、不是用来炒的！)" so how is it the government's fault for people choosing to speculate over property? You said: "And specifically, for it going backwards and trying to reverse its openness and becoming aggressive" Look, all those problems you described are a result of capitalism seeping into China after Deng's economic reforms in the late 1970s. Debts, loans, property speculation, relocation of companies, they are all caused by capitalism. China is returning back to our communist roots that will help reduce the growing income inequality. You said: "My problem is not with the Chinese people - I am human, Chinese are exactly like me and deserve all the best. But when it comes to corrupt power-hungry degenerates, " Look, it was Chinese people that invested, or speculated over property prices, or borrowed money or lent money, not the government. In fact, it's actually the government that's stepping in most of the time to clean up the problems and propose solutions to these problems.
    1
  23426.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "Now, understand me: I do not wish bad to the Chinese, on the contrary." You've been wishing for China's economic downfall all this time, why pretend that you do not wish ill onto China? You said: "But all of what's happening is a direct consequence of Chinese government's mismanagement, corruption and abuse." Explain how is that so? It's government policies that are alleviating poverty in China and providing support so that people in China do not slip back into poverty. The government has no control over how much Chinese companies borrow from creditors, neither is the government responsible for how much other countries choose to borrow from Chinese banks, so how is the government responsible for this? Even regarding Evergrande, it's the citizens themselves who choose to invest in a second apartment and it's the property speculation that drove Evergrande into its current state. President Xi Jinping said: "Houses are for living in, not for speculation! (房子是用来住的、不是用来炒的！)" so how is it the government's fault for people choosing to speculate over property? You said: "And specifically, for it going backwards and trying to reverse its openness and becoming aggressive" Because all those problems you described are a direct result of capitalism. China is returning back to our communist roots that will help reduce the growing income inequality. You said: "My problem is not with the Chinese people - I am human, Chinese are exactly like me and deserve all the best. But when it comes to corrupt power-hungry degenerates, " Look, it was Chinese people that invested, or speculated over property prices, or borrowed money or lent money, not the government. In fact, it's actually the government that's stepping in most of the time to clean up the problems and propose solutions to these problems.
    1
  23427.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "Now, understand me: I do not wish bad to the Chinese, on the contrary." You've been literally wishing for China's economy to collapse all this time, why pretend that you don't? You said: "But all of what's happening is a direct consequence of Chinese government's mismanagement, corruption and abuse." Explain how is that so? It's government policies that are alleviating poverty in China and providing support so that people in China do not slip back into poverty. The government has no control over how much Chinese companies borrow from creditors, neither is the government responsible for how much other countries choose to borrow from Chinese banks, so how is the government responsible for this? Even regarding Evergrande, it's the citizens themselves who choose to invest in a second apartment and it's the property speculation that drove Evergrande into its current state. President Xi Jinping said: "Houses are for living in, not for speculation! (房子是用来住的、不是用来炒的！)" so how is it the government's fault for people choosing to speculate over property?
    1
  23428.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "Now, understand me: I do not wish bad to the Chinese, on the contrary." You've been talking about China collasping in all your comments, why pretend that you do not wish ill to the Chinese? You said: "But all of what's happening is a direct consequence of Chinese government's mismanagement, corruption and abuse." Explain how is that so? It's government policies that are alleviating poverty in China and providing support so that people in China do not slip back into poverty. The government has no control over how much Chinese companies borrow from creditors, neither is the government responsible for how much other countries choose to borrow from Chinese banks, so how is the government responsible for this?
    1
  23429.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "But all of what's happening is a direct consequence of Chinese government's mismanagement, corruption and abuse." Explain how is that so? It's government policies that are alleviating poverty in China and providing support so that people in China do not slip back into poverty. The government has no control over how much Chinese companies borrow from creditors, neither is the government responsible for how much other countries choose to borrow from Chinese banks, so how is the government responsible for this? Even regarding Evergrande, it's the citizens themselves who choose to invest in a second apartment and it's the property speculation that drove Evergrande into its current state. President Xi Jinping said: "Houses are for living in, not for speculation! (房子是用来住的、不是用来炒的！)" so how is it the government's fault for people choosing to speculate over property? You said: "And specifically, for it going backwards and trying to reverse its openness and becoming aggressive" Because all those problems you described are a direct result of capitalism. China is returning back to our communist roots that will help reduce the growing income inequality. You said: "My problem is not with the Chinese people - I am human, Chinese are exactly like me and deserve all the best. But when it comes to corrupt power-hungry degenerates, " Look, it was Chinese people that invested, or speculated over property prices, or borrowed money or lent money, not the government. In fact, it's actually the government that's stepping in most of the time to clean up the problems and propose solutions to these problems.
    1
  23430.  @andrenogueira5058  You said: "Now, understand me: I do not wish bad to the Chinese, on the contrary." You've literally been slinging mud onto everything China does in your comments, yet you pretend that you do not wish ill of China?
    1
  23431.  @Carrera6rennsport  Japan and Korea copied Chinese culture like growing rice, cultivating silk clothing, using chopsticks, Chinese architecture, bonzai (pengzai), Chinese musical instruments, even reading and writing Chinese characters (Hanzi) poetry and calligraphy. Take Han Chinese traditional clothing Hanfu (汉服) for example and it has 5,000 years of history and even the Japanese Kimono and Korean Hanbok clothing have their origins in Chinese Hanfu. Video: Beautiful Traditional Costume: Han Chinese Clothing (Hanfu) youtu.be/T6CucJxiWec?t=5
    1
  23432.  Dark of the knight  Hygiene standards? Here's video of Hakodate Seafood Market in Japan and how's it any different from China's? Video: Hakodate Seafood Market - Japan youtu.be/SskPtUAcUKQ
    1
  23433.  @christopherkucinski2383  You're clearly anti-China, you mock our wet markets hygiene when it's literally comparable to Japanese wet markets, because you're anti-China. Why pretend you aren't anti-China here?
    1
  23434.  @christopherkucinski2383  "神州 Shenzhou , you are CCP troll deleting all sensible replies." How do I delete all replies? At the most I can only delete my own comments but why are you accusing me of deleting all sensible replies? Could the free and democratic YouTube somehow be deleting your comments? Absolutely impossible! There's simply no way that YouTube of all websites would censor comments! Simply ridiculous! Completely unfathomable! YouTube absolutely does not delete comments, it's a product of a free and democratic society after all!
    1
  23435. In any war, the truth is the first casualty.
    1
  23436.  @hyc1266  Like you, I too personally support Russia in the Ukraine crisis. Not many know this but Ukraine had been supporting ultra-nationalist neo-Nazis like the Azov Battalion and their ranks are littered with Nazi symbols (even NATO has unwittingly photographed Ukrainian military personal sporting such symbols). For 8 years, such groups have been carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Luhansk, and shelling (by both sides) has resulted in the deaths of some 13,000 people in the region. Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that was set in motion since the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukraine President Yanukoyvch by the USA, and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine. There are many video materials for people who want to know more about the conflict available on YouTube such as: Video: Why is Ukraine the West's Fault? Featuring John Mearsheimer Video: Ukraine on Fire 2016 documentary by Oliver Stone Video: Vladimir Pozner: How the United States Created Vladimir Putin
    1
  23437. Patrick Lancaster is another journalist on the ground in Ukraine, and has been reporting on the Donbass situation for many years prior to this special military operation by Russia. Hope he remains safe to continue carrying out the good work.
    1
  23438. Who is being dishonest here? All I am asking you is for evidence to back your accusations, and I provided actual examples of how Ugyhurs are treated better than Han Chinese. If you want to talk about human rights violations, then the Indian Army has been committing atrocities in Kashmir such as raping of Kashmiri Muslim women. Yet you still play ignorant and innocent here, and complain "That's why I don't understand why Muslims hate India and support China."
    1
  23439. Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when Mongolians conquered both Tibet and Song dynasty China, and made Tibet part of Yuan dynasty. Tibet broke free of China in 1911, but was reincorporated back in 1951, and under Chinese government, Tibetan lives have improved tremendously. For example, mountainous Tibetan soil is infertile, and the serfs struggle to feed the population and the 5% elite slave owners. Starvation was commonplace, crime was punished by torture and mutilation, even by skinning. There is Tibetan drum called damaru that make use of human slave skulls, human skin and using human bone for the drumstick. But under Chinese government, Tibet's population grew from 1.14 million in 1951, to around 3 million today, triple its size today. This is because food can now be imported from the mainland to feed Tibetans. As far as I know, Tibet's population is 90% Tibetan and about 6% Han Chinese, so how is the ethnic local populations being replaced? Han Chinese settle in Tibet to help build roads and infrastructure like railways, such as Qinghai railway (world's highest elevation railway) going through difficult mountainous terrain with low oxygen environments, so that the normally isolated Tibet is connected with rest of the world. Source:Tibet's population was 1.14 million in 1951. is.china-embassy.org/eng/zt/ChinasTibet/t427565.htm If you don't "re-educate" the Kashmir people, then how will the people of Kashmir ever feel like they are part of India? The Kashmir people feel alienated by Indians, and Indian Army can just commit atrocities like rape on Muslim women, without retribution. The Indian Army still has to deal with separatists issue, just like PLA in Tibet as well, and abuse the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act that protect Indian higher-ups from persecution by rape victims. India is the world's largest democracy, but what exactly has it done for India at all? But China is even worst, since we are communist country, and automatically doomed to fail, isn't it? Jai Hind! Please rescue poor Chinese from our own government here!
    1
  23440. Like I said, Tibet was made part of China since 800 years by Mongolians (and also later by the Manchu people) so why are you blaming Han Chinese, when it was Mongolians and Manchu people that made Tibet part of China? You claim Tibetans are violently disagreeing with this, but where is your evidence? Only small minority of Tibetans in Tibet have separatist ideals, but other than that, the Tibetans have largely accepted Chinese sovereignty. You mean just because a few separatists from India, in Kashmir or North East India want to break away from India, means the all those states want independence? What is your logic here? As for opium, yes, during the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking our tea, but had nothing that Chinese people wanted in return, so British waged two blood wars and forced Chinese people to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people, turning us into dogs of the West. But today, China is no dog of the West anymore. Modern China was built by sweat, blood, tears and sacrifice of Chinese people to turn China from dirt-poor, starving and wartorn country, into an economic power, protected by world's largest land army, the PLA, and potential rival to USA. 30 years ago, nobody expected Communist China to ever succeed or to participate in global activities. After the Soviet Union collapse, many people assumed China will be next. But China didn't fall and instead became an economic juggernaut today and a global player of world politics. You can hardly go through the day's news without any mention of China at all, since China now has such a large global presence. But what of India? Is India still a doing the bidding of the West? You want to talk about human spirit, then Chinese people have worked hard to get to where we are to day, building infrastructure, working long hours at sweatshops, earning only a pittance over years to get to where we are today. You and the Western media keep saying "This will be China's downfall" but China is still here and growing stronger everyday, so who is the ignorant one here? I mean, you still haven't produced any evidence of the human rights violations against the Ugyhurs at all, whereas I have shown the rape that is going on in Kashmir on Muslim women. Yet you still said previously: "Exactly. That's why I don't understand why Muslims hate India and support China."
    1
  23441. Khaira ਖਹਿਰਾ But clearly you were the one who first brought up Tibetans here. How am I sidelining the argument? Can you answer my initial question about the human rights violations against Uighurs? (which you still failed to name even a single one)? I used logic in my discussion and quote sources, whereas you make up accusations without proof? I pointed that Indian Army has been raping Kashmiri Muslim women and you have nothing to say to that?
    1
  23442. During wartime, China can always manufacture more weapons, ammunition, missiles tanks, fighters, etc, to replace losses incurred. But India relies on purchasing foreign military hardware from countries like USA and Russia, and these countries may just suddenly increase the prices of their wares during wartime, because they know India has no choice but to buy from them, if they want to continue fighting with China. China has built roads and supply lines throughout Tibet so that our troops, armor and supplies can reach the front line much faster. China even conducted a live fire exercise in Tibet, during the Doklam Standoff, showing off our artillery guns, howitzers, mortars, multi-launch rocket systems, etc, even in the high Tibetan plateau. Video:Chinese Army carries out military exercise on Tibet plateau youtube.com/watch?v=a8bNgIckr10 China even have our own light tank, the VT5, suitable for combat in mountainous terrain combat like Doklam, Tibet, Kashmir, etc, whereas India's has no suitable light tank at the moment and is making requests to order one of its own. Video:China shows off the capability of its new VT5 light tank youtube.com/watch?v=hQtH4L0LsDM
    1
  23443. China is implementing meritocracy by promoting good behavior and discourage bad behavior through social credit system.
    1
  23444. Xi Jinping= Chessmaster
    1
  23445. If not for president Xi Jinping, would president Trump ever been able to talk to Kim Jung Un at all? This upcoming dialogue is made possible thanks to Chinese efforts, not USA. All Trump did was name calling and imposing tariffs that's all.
    1
  23446.  @googlerwunn7344  You said: "I was just asking Shenzhou to clarify something not clear to me?" Clarify what? That it was Americans (majority of them anyway) that elected their U.S leaders into power? So you agree that Americans only have themselves to blame for their leaders isn't it?
    1
  23447.  @googlerwunn7344  So earlier you were saying: "I was just asking Shenzhou to clarify something not clear to me?" then what were you asking me to clarify? I simply stated that the Americans (majority of them anyway) that elected their U.S politicians into power, so Americans only have themselves to blame for their politicians wouldn't you agree?
    1
  23448.  @googlerwunn7344  So you agree with me that the Americans (majority of them anyway) elected their U.S politicians into power, so Americans only have themselves to blame for their politicians? And what were you asking me to clarify, when you said: "I was just asking Shenzhou to clarify something not clear to me?"
    1
  23449.  @googlerwunn7344  "神州 Shenzhou how could I agree on something that confuses me." Which part confuses you? The Americans (majority of them) voted for their politicians so aren't the American people themselves responsible for their politicians coming to the power? It's pretty self-explanatory, which part is confusing? And when you said: "I was just asking Shenzhou to clarify something not clear to me?" what were you asking me to clarify?
    1
  23450.  @googlerwunn7344  But earlier you said how could you agree on what confuses you, so which part of my comment confuses you? To explain my point: -Americans vote for their favourite candidates during elections. -The US politician with the most votes gets into power -so in conclusion, aren't Americans themselves (majority of them anyway) responsible for their politicians coming into power? I mean it's pretty self-explanatory, which part confuses you?
    1
  23451.  @googlerwunn7344  I'm from China, but there a reason why you want to know where I'm from?
    1
  23452.  @googlerwunn7344  Reason for what? All I'm asking you is that which part my comment that "Americans (majority of them anyway) are responsible for their politicians coming into power" is confusing to you?
    1
  23453.  @googlerwunn7344  "神州 Shenzhou you answer first my question before I answer you. Okay?" Hey, I clearly asked you a question first (which you repeatedly fail to answer) now you want me to answer your question before you answer mine? And I clearly answered that I'm from China, yet you refuse to answer my questions, instead you demand that I answer your question?
    1
  23454.  @googlerwunn7344  Why don't you answer my questions first instead of demanding that I answer your questions?
    1
  23455.  @googlerwunn7344  So why not attempt to refute the argument that Americans (majority of them anyway) are responsible for electing their politicians into power then? If you disagree, simply explain your reasonings, instead of asking silly questions. Such behavior is reminiscent of a spoiled brat.
    1
  23456.  @Rusty571000  Obama may have divided America, but Trump exacerbated the divide and now Biden is unable to bridge the divide among Americans today.
    1
  23457. As of 2020, China's Three Gorges Dam generated 111.8 billion kWh of power which is equivalent to burning about 34.39 million tons of coal and producing 94.02 million tons of carbon dioxide, 22,400 tons of sulfur dioxide and 21,200 tons of nitrogen oxide.
    1
  23458.  @cloudzack1090  Bat Lady? If you're talking about the alleged coronavirus bat-soup origins, then it has long been debunked that the video was filmed in an island near Indonesia, not in Wuhan, China.
    1
  23459.  @V01DIORE  Covid-19 is not manufactured in a lab. Tulane virologist Robert Garry, PhD, and a team of researchers analyzed the genome sequence of the novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and found no evidence that the virus was made in a laboratory or otherwise engineered. Video: Virologist explains origins of COVID-19 youtu.be/YLykxJqTBpU
    1
  23460.  @thomasfholland  Tulane virologist Robert Garry, PhD, and a team of researchers analyzed the genome sequence of the novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and found no evidence that the virus was made in a laboratory or otherwise engineered. Video: Virologist explains origins of COVID-19 youtu.be/YLykxJqTBpU
    1
  23461.  @EmilJamie  "神州 Shenzhou if she wants privacy, then why would she post about being raped in the first place?! Are you trying to protect the rapist?!" Could you point me to where did Peng Shuai post about being raped in the first place? Peng Shuai sent an email to WTA, which stated that she was resting at home and that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    1
  23462.  @V01DIORE  "Did such starve, what was it, 50 million people?" Those people starved because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Chairman Mao couldn't possibly control the weather, isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong again. "Then go on to create a totalitarian abomination who subverts their own citizens under constant surveillance," Didn't Edward Snowden and Julian Assange of Wikileaks exposed that the U.S spies on its allies and monitor their citizens conversations for keywords relating to terrorism? "the successor to nazi germany who has concentration camps for forced labour and organ harvesting," Guantanamo Bay Detention Center exists, and U.S law permits torture including waterboarding.
    1
  23463.  @V01DIORE  China Uncensored is anti-China in nature and have made up lies in their attempt to discredit China. For example, Chris Chappel once said that the Nanjing Massacre Memorial Museum sells "war-time rape p0rn" but everyone knows such explicit material is banned in China. It's the last sentence of this video:youtu.be/xBW1lQw_WrI
    1
  23464.  @hudziszeq  "神州 Shenzhou I've been to China and I know what I'm talking about." Which part of our vast country of China did you visit?
    1
  23465.  @hudziszeq  "神州 Shenzhou None of your business you CCP bot." Look at your reaction when someone tries to pry into your personal affairs. In the same way, Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile, given that her previous relationship with a much older man has been exposed, then why is it inconceivable to people that she wants her privacy to be respected? Yet the WTA is behaving like a paparazzi and trying to pry into her personal affairs. It's frankly "None of their business" too.
    1
  23466.  @hudziszeq  "神州 Shenzhou CCP Bot." You can't refute my points so you just label me as a communist party shill for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours? Why don't you attack my points instead of attacking me personally?
    1
  23467.  @hudziszeq  "神州 Shenzhou CCP Bot." So you're just a broken recorder with nothing substantial to contribute to the discussion except name-calling?
    1
  23468.  @hudziszeq  "神州 Shenzhou Yes, why would I want to converse with CCP bot?" So you label me a communist party bot, but continue conversing with me then aren't you contradicting yourself? It's apparent that you can't refute my points, that's why you refuse to participate in further discussion and instead resort to labels against me that's all.
    1
  23469.  @hudziszeq  "神州 Shenzhou Did you reach your quota of communist propaganda for today then?" You can't even refute my points all you done is repeat "神州 Shenzhou CCP Bot." like a broken record, then what is the point of discussion?
    1
  23470.  @charlesfavell3350  Genocidal? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  23471.  @charlesfavell3350  "神州 Shenzhou Speaking of bringing something to the conversation Do you even have one Independent thought?" Yes, I believe Peng Shuai wants to keep a low profile, after her previous relationship with a much older man has been revealed. She has an open communication channel with the WTA where they can exchange emails, but WTA is demanding that she appear in public to bare her private affairs for the world to see.
    1
  23472.  @charlesfavell3350  "Or are you just here to Regurgitate CCP propaganda When you have something useful to say come back In the meantime here's 50 cents" The Communist Party of China has thus far, remained mostly silent on the matter, the most is that the ministry of foreign affairs spokesperson saying "China does not support politicization of sports" As far as I know, I'm the one coming up with independent thoughts here, the rest of you are just gobbling up what the Western anti-China propaganda feeds you, without any room for independent thought of your own. Can't you see that you're just regurgitating what Western anti-China media is telling you?
    1
  23473.  @dannwan8537  "神州 Shenzhou SHE already bared her private affairs!" And it's possible that she deleted her post, and now she has expressed on the video call with IOC a wish for others to respect her privacy.
    1
  23474.  @EmilJamie  "神州 Shenzhou the post deleted within 35 minutes after she posted it. Dude everyone knows she was raped." So where in Peng Shuai's post did she ever said she was raped? Have you read her post for yourself? There's a translation of Peng Shuai's post on Reddit, and she has had a tumultuous, on-and-off affair with a much older man, but where's the allegation of rape in her post?
    1
  23475.  @doandroidsdream1748  "神州 Shenzhou How many social credit points did this interaction get you?" Why can't you attempt to refute my points instead of labelling me a bot for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours?
    1
  23476.  @hudziszeq  So why don't you contribute something productive to the discussion, rather than insults and demeaning remarks?
    1
  23477.  @doandroidsdream1748  "神州 Shenzhou I don’t need to refute your points. You are a shill which makes every statement that comes out of your mouth false." That just means that you're close-minded, and unwilling to explore another point of view. Why not attack my points instead of attacking me personally for my views?
    1
  23478.  @charlesfavell3350  "Including Free and Independent Taiwan 🇹🇼" If you claim Taiwan is free and independent, then why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations and the World Health Organization like an independent country can? Is there something that's preventing Taiwan from joining the UN and the WHO?
    1
  23479.  @EmilJamie  "In fact if there was nothing wrong with this case in general you wouldn't try so hard in the comments section to disprove us all!" Because there really is no basis for accusations of sexual assault. If you read Peng Shuai's post (or the translated one on Reddit) she has had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, now that this shameful affair has been revealed, Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile and avoiding the public eye. But where's the allegations of sexual assault in her post? There's none, so now you try to shift it to not having access to original post? The reason I'm trying so hard is because the 2022 Beijing Olympics is coming and the WTA is trying to politicise sports in order to use this as ammunition to get more countries to consider boycotting the Olympics. It's obvious what the WTA is doing, even though Peng Shuai is fine and has been attending dinners and kids awards ceremonies, the WTA is still trying to pry into her personal affairs.
    1
  23480.  @Cursed_Mark  "This went on for years until Taiwan democratically elected a President that the CCP didn't approve of, forcing the WHO to revoke that status." Congratulations, you've just shown that Taiwan isn't independent since their WHO status has been revoked because (according to you) the Communist Party of China didn't like it. There's clearly a force that's preventing Taiwan from joining the WHO as a full member like an independent country can. As you said Taiwan can only join as an observer status under "Chinese Taipei" as permitted by the CPC, that means Taiwan isn't independent then.
    1
  23481.  @EmilJamie  "神州 Shenzhou show me original post that was posted by her, and then ask me questions, do not blush it me with redacted and reposted post after you guys took her under control." There's a translation of Peng Shuai's post available on Reddit for you to refer to, and Peng Shuai's had a tough time emotionally through this "breakup-and-makeup" affair with a much older man, spanning several years, but where is the allegation of sexual assault in her post? There's clearly none, and you don't even have a basis for your case, then how to even proceed with your argument at all? You have no basis, so you just claim that her post was "redacted and reposted" because it doesn't contain the information you're seeking, is that your method of attack?
    1
  23482.  @Cursed_Mark  "Yes, that's the CCP." So you've firmly established that Taiwan isn't independent after all, since Taiwan cannot join the United Nations because (according to you) the Communist Party of China doesn't like it. It's a clear indication from you that Taiwan is being controlled by the CPC. About "dictators for life", China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US short term leadership.
    1
  23483.  @marct9942  "神州 Shenzhou My evidence is the long history of communist regimes. And the present horrific violation of human rights committed by the chinese government as well as their ongoing attempt at genocide" China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the USA is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  23484.  @Raksasaification  "It is a country of 1.44 billion with a cabal, the CCP, in total control." What makes you think the Communist Party of China can control all 1.4 billion people in China? Do you actually have evidence of Peng Shuai's family and friends being threatened? If not, then why are you seemingly jumping to conclusions without proof?
    1
  23485.  @strnglhld  "And this is how they treat a woman who was raped by a party official. Shameful." That's a serious accusation, do you have evidence that she was raped by a party official? I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and she previously had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several years in fact, but where are the allegations of sexual assault in her post? Could you point out where in her post did she ever said that she was raped?
    1
  23486.  @Castapher  "神州 Shenzhou Return to Weibo where you belong. why are you here trying to convince the CCP are peacemakers?" Because that's what it is, China is currently at not at war with any country and the People's Liberation Army hasn't had any actual combat experience since our last conflict in 1979. Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but fast forward till today and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, and funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. "The 9 dash territory claim is an exaggerated distance from the Mainland China." The South China Sea is basically within China's doorstep. Look at the United States, claiming Hawaii and Guam Island in the Pacific Ocean, at such an exaggerated distance from the American mainland, and yet you want to complain about China claiming our own front doorstep?
    1
  23487.  @Castapher  "神州 Shenzhou Hawaii became US territory after numerous referendums from the citizens and habitants of Hawaii." Only U.S citizens in Hawaii were allowed to vote for Hawaii to join USA. The inhabitants of Hawaii only get to votd if they voluntarily become U.S citizens themselves (thus tying themselves to America) and those inhabitants that wanted independence obviously didn't become U.S citizens and their votes didn't show up in the Hawaii referendums. This is one of the insidious ways USA use to claim ownership of a territory that they never historically owned. Ownership of Guam was transferred from Spain to USA, and the citizens of Guam get no political say. Guam inhabitants can't even vote in U.S presidential elections, despite being American citizens themselves, the same goes for Puerto Rico being unable to vote for the U.S President. As for Philippines, the Americans initially promised to grant Philippines independence if the Filipinos aided USA against Spain. But after the U.S fought Spain, the Americans broke their promise and forcefully took over Philippines as an American colony, sparking off the Philippine American War in which only 4,000 American soldiers but 20,000 Filipino soldiers died and a whopping 250,000 Filipino civilians died, and Philippine lost and became an American colony. Video: The Philippine American War-The Shocking Truth youtu.be/bN2wrZGcs8s The funny thing is how you phrase it as the Philippines "went to war" with USA even though they were fighting for Filipino independence.
    1
  23488.  @Castapher  You said: "SOMETHING CHINA WILL NEVER DO TO TAIWAN !" Well, Taiwan was historically part of Chinese territory (unlike the Philippines for USA) and even today, if you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. According to its constitution, Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Myanmar, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Since Taiwan can continue to claim all of mainland China, then can't mainland China continue to do the same to Taiwan? "China claimed South China Sea many small islands without war, without plebiscites." Yes, China claimed those small islands without war, unlike when USA fought the Spanish for Guam and Philippines. And you can't hold plebiscites when there aren't any indigenous inhabitants in many of the South China Sea Islands. "They just formed artificially those Islands against Maritime law of the Sea." If you are referring to UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea) then there is no prohibition against the construction of artificial islands. It does say that artificial islands don't not possess the status of islands, but nothing about prohibiting their construction. "They ignored the Judge decision that by international law can't own the 9 dash line as a whole." Which judge decision are you referring to? And before the 9 Dash Line, the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) had previously published the 11 Dash Line and claimed the South China Sea islands for China. The ROC lost the mainland to communists and they fled to Taiwan where they still maintain 11 Dash Line. The People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 had reduced the number of dashes by 2, and it became the 9 Dash Line. "China actually invaded and owned those Islands because they simply wanted it." Since there are no indigenous inhabitants in many of those South China Sea Islands, it wasn't really an invasion, given that historically, China had claimed those islands and reasserted claims time and time again. Back when ROC published the 11 Dash Line, no one objected to China's claims, not the Vietnamese, not the Philippines, not even the USA. The USA even gifted their warships (like the USS Decker) to help ROC liberate the South China Sea from Japanese occupation, and this warship was renamed ROCS Taiping (太平). One of the South China Sea Island (Itu Aba island) was even renamed Taiping Island in honor of the warship that landed on it. "Yes, there are Islands that belonged to Vietnam, and China stole their islands and killed vietnamese and claimed those Islands as their own." Which islands are you talking about and can you prove that they belong to Vietnam?
    1
  23489.  @Castapher  "神州 Shenzhou You are wrong, about Hawaii elections, a lawful resident of Hawaii could also vote." What is a lawful resident of Hawaii? Those indigenous inhabitants of Hawaii who refused to register themselves as U.S citizens aren't allowed to vote for Hawaii independence. Those inhabitants that acquire U.S citizenship are tying themselves to USA and now have a vested interest to vote for Hawaii to join the USA. Furthermore, U.S citizens from mainland USA were flooding into Hawaii faster than the inhabitants could reproduce, and their votes eventually swayed the referendum in favor of Hawaii joining the U.S. It's a tactic that USA uses to sway elections to their favor, and in this case, eventually the inhabitants of Hawaii wanting independence were outnumbered by U.S citizens. Citizens living in Puerto Ricans and Guam cannot participate in voting during U.S Presidential elections even though those territory are considered part of the United States. You said: "We could argue about the war of US and Spain for so long. But the truth is there: USA gave Philippines independence. That's something that China can never do." Obviously, China can't give independence to the Philippines because the Philippines is not a Chinese colony nor part of China. But the Americans initially promised Philippines independence if they side with USA against the Spanish, but the USA betrayed them and claimed Philippines for a US colony. You said: "China says is a better democracy than USA, but China doesn't accept people's voice and opinions." There are many ways to define "democracy", one definition is a government of the people, for the people, by the people. A recent Harvard and Ash Center survey has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. "A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study." In contrast though, 3 in 5 Americans are dissatisfied with the way democracy is working in the United States today according to a poll by Economist. So depending on your definition of "democracy" it appears that many Chinese are satisfied with the communist party's governance of China, compare to many Americans being dissatisfied with theirs. You said: "If an USA territory wants to achieve independence, all they have to do is vote and do plebiscites and let the people vote and decide....All those processes are impossible in China and you know it." That's a frightening thought for the USA: to see the United States possibly fracturing into multiple countries (possibly if Texas succeed). We have already witnessed the United Kingdom exiting the European Union, and each separation weakens the strength of the original power. That's why China fight so hard to hold on to our territories like Xinjiang, Tibet, Hong Kong, etc, because we don't want to end up a weak and divided nation, like China was in the past. "China wants to expand, that's why it can't never grant independence to Taiwan." As previously mentioned, Taiwan considers itself part of China under their own constitution, and still claims all of mainland China as part of their territory, so can't mainland China do the same to Taiwan? As for China's expansionism, which country has formally become a Chinese colony?
    1
  23490.  @Castapher  "神州 Shenzhou The Islands that belonged to Vietnam are the Yagong Island and the Crescent group of reef from the south of Vietnam." So this Yagong Island, do you have proof that it belonged to Vietnam? Prior to 2013 the island was a barren stretch of coral and clamshells surrounding a central lagoon, and China eventually developed the island to become home to a residential population of about 100 fishermen with solar power and a desalination plant. "Regarding Taiwan's Constitution claiming all mainland China, that's from the original ROC from the 1950's. Once Taiwan's become independent, their Constitution will change." So since Taiwan has not formally declared independence and amended their constitution, that means by default Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Most major countries in the world, including USA, UK, France, Germany, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India, Japan, Korea, etc, acknowledge the One-China Policy that Taiwan is part of China. "You keep insisting China has the historical claims im the SCS, but the Court international law of the sea already said cannot claim the 90% of SCS because of historical claim," What is this "Court International Law of the Sea" are you talking about? If you're referring to the International Court of Justice, then the ICJ did not made any such ruling against China's claim to the SCS. Show me which court you are referring to. "You say China is a peaceful nation and yet everything what they are doing, is really the opposite." China is current at peace, can you name me which country is China currently at war with? As in actual war with tanks, fighters, submarines and what not? I mean, China's People's Liberation Army hasn't had any actual combat experience since our last conflict in 1979, everyone knows China's army is inexperienced in actual warfare.
    1
  23491.  @marct9942  About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    1
  23492.  @marct9942  Westerners have been polluting the planet since 200-300 years ago, back at the birth of capitalism during the Industrial Revolution period in around 1700-1800s. China in comparison, only industrialized some 50 years go after Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms in the late 1970s. "I know you're on the propaganda team, otherwise how would a chinese citizen have access to the internet?" What makes you seem to think a Chinese citizen doesn't have access to the Internet? China has the world's largest number of Internet users at 829 million for crying out loud. Top 10 Countries with Highest Internet User 1. China: 829 million users 2. India: 560 million users 3. United States: 292 million users 4. Brazil: 149 million users 5. Indonesia: 143 million users 6. Japan: 118 million users 7. Nigeria: 111 million users 8. Russia: 109 million users 9. Bangladesh: 93 million users 10. Mexico: 86 million users ... Video: Top 10 Countries by Total Internet Users (1990-2019) Includes Percentage youtu.be/8Yg6FpeNj0w
    1
  23493.  @marct9942  About trying to save the planet, the Chinese government has implement green initiatives such as planting the world's largest artificial forest, Saihanba National Forest Park (塞罕坝国家森林公园) covering an area of 200.29-square-kilometre (77.33 sq mi). Video: Two generations spent 55 years building world's largest man-made forest in Saihanba, N. China youtu.be/3RqsUD6fyGk
    1
  23494.  @marct9942  Who said that YouTube is banned in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been banned just for doing so?
    1
  23495.  @marct9942  About saving the planet, the Maowusu Desert (毛乌素沙漠) is China's 5th largest desert, the size of Massachusetts and Connecticut combined is now around 80% afforested, even though it's still labelled as a desert in many maps. Video: China's green growth miracle youtu.be/rDrbnsbVxlI Previously the forest coverage in Ejin Horo Banner was less than 3%. After all these years of efforts, the forest coverage increased to 90%.
    1
  23496.  @Castapher  "Later during the 1950's France handed those Islands to Republic of Vietnam" The Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam) eventually lost to North Vietnam, after the United States abandoned their allies during the Fall of Saigon and left the South Vietnamese to their fate. On 1956, the North Vietnam Communist government formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese, and the North Vietnam PM Pham Van Dong even wrote a diplomatic letter to Chinese premier Zhou Enlai. In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. You said: "Taiwan is part of China? Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Even the United Sates President Biden acknowledged the One-China Policy that Taiwan is part of China. You said: "Since when was the last time your leader Xi has visited the Island?" Well, since when was the last time Joe Biden visited Guam island? Yet Guam is part of the United States of America, just as Taiwan island is part of China. You said: "Has the CCP commanded the Island before?" Well, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations? Is there something that's preventing Taiwan island from joining the UN like an independent country could? You said: "Your leader Xi was elected by the very own CCP party., not the people." Plenty of democratic countries have a leader that's elected by the parties, not the people. Take for example Canada, and Justin Trudeau was elected by the Liberals. Also, British PM Boris Johnson was elected by the Conservative party, and the people of Canada and Britain did not vote for their current leaders. "The court I am talking about is: International Tribunal For the law of the Sea, established by the Third United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. * it ruled out China can't own the whole SCS based on historical facts.. Remember, this decision was during a dispute of China with Philippines." I went to the International Tribunal For the law of the Sea website and checked the List of Cases, and Philippines did not file any case with this International Tribunal, what are you talking about? According to their website, here's their most recent cases. International Tribunal For the law of the Sea: List of Cases Case No. 29: (Switzerland/Nigeria) Case No. 28: (Mauritius/Maldives) Case No. 27: (Switzerland v. Nigeria) Case No. 26: (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) Case No. 25: (Panama v. Italy) Case No. 24: (Italy v. India) ... There's NO case number in International Tribunal For the law of the Sea involving China/Philippines, could you list me the Case No? Are you sure this the correct International Tribunal you are referring to? You said: "You said China is a peaceful nations?" Yes, China is currently at peace, which country is China currently at war with? You said: "But the images of the satellites doesn't lie. It shows China conducting bombings against dummies of US Navy ships." Well, that's a military exercise and countries all over the world conduct military exercises of their own. It's to brush up on the People's Liberation Army combat readiness. You said: "They are mass producing nuclear nukes." The number of nukes China has is far less than the number of nuclear weapons the United States have, the US has 3,750 nuclear warheads in its stockpile. You said: " Mass producing ships and planes. " The U.S military budget is more than the next 7 countries (including China's combined) and the U.S military production is far more than China's Again, all these points still doesn't change the fact that China is currently at peace and not at war, why can't you name a country that China is currently at war with? "China says is just educational camps for them, and yet the satellites images say the opposite." People have visited the ground coordinates of those satellite images and they found it's just normal schools, administration buildings and apartments. The “detention center” (geographic coordinates: 38.8367N, 77.7056E) claimed by ASPI, is actually a gerocomium in Markit county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang The "detention center" (geographic coordinates: 38.9950N, 77.6682E) claimed by ASPI, is actually an elementary school in Yantaq township, Markit county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang The “detention center” (geographic coordinates: 39.8252N, 78.5501E) claimed by ASPI, is actually a logistics park in Bachu county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang The “detention center” (geographic coordinates: 38.9046N, 77.6153E) claimed by ASPI, is actually a middle school in Markit county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang You said: "India tried to talk so many rounds of peaceful talks and offer constructive ideas on how to solve the LAC issue And China never wanted to offer suggestions." What suggestions did India offer? China’s former top diplomat, Dai Bingguo offered to solve the border issue by suggesting that if India agreed to make concessions in the eastern sector, then China would also make concessions in Aksai Chin.
    1
  23497.  @Castapher  "神州 Shenzhou YouTube is banned in China," Who said YouTube is banned in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so? The government has a list of approved-VPNs, and as long as you use a government-approved VPN, nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China.
    1
  23498.  @Castapher  China’s former top diplomat said that the border dispute between China and India can be resolved if New Delhi accepts Beijing’s claim over strategically vital Tawang region in Arunachal Pradesh. Video: Concession On Tawang Can Resolve India-China Border Dispute, Says Ex-Chinese Diplomat youtu.be/uD-q-TZm90o But what suggestion did India offer to help solve the LAC issue?
    1
  23499.  @Castapher  You said: "Bhutan is weak Country and depends mostly on India's help. But last time Bhutan didn't let India help them, why? Because China is offer huge amount of money in exchange and also vaccines. Coercion again from the CCP." So according to you, Bhutan is weak and nothing wrong when they are dependent on India, but when China offer to send aid to Bhutan (including vaccines) suddenly that's considered coercion? What sort of double standards is this? Bhutan can only be dependent on India and cannot trade with China, is that what you're implying?
    1
  23500.  @Castapher  You said: "Constructing villages within Bhutan territory." That's fake news. China is building villages well within our side of the LAC and there hasn't been any transgrasseions. Even the Indian Army Defence Chief has refuted claims of China building on another territory. Here's taken from Indian news outlets like Economic Times. Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) Bipin Rawat on Thursday said the controversy about the Chinese coming into the Indian territory and building a new village is "not true", and that the villages were well within the Chinese side of the Line of Actual Control (LAC). He also asserted that China has not transgressed the Indian "perception" of the LAC. Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) Bipin Rawat on Thursday refuted all rumours regarding China building its villages on Indian territory and said that there are no transgressions against the Indian “perception” of the Line of Actual Control (LAC) as of yet. Referring to the controversy over Chinese troops crossing into the Indian side for the purpose of constructing a new village, CDS Rawat said that these reports were “not true” and that although the said villages exist, they are well within the Chinese side of the LAC.
    1
  23501.  @Castapher  "If North Vietnam accepted the Parcels Islands are part of China, then why did the Chinese PLA killed dozens of vietnamese in those islands?" Because North Vietnam suddenly changed their minds after previously admitting that the Paracel Islands are part of China. Also the majority of the Paracel Islands lie within 200 NM of China's geographic baseline, so China can claim those islands as within China's EEZ You said: "- Regarding Taiwan's Constitution, IN WHICH ARTICLE of Taiwan's Constitution specifically says "Taiwan is part of China". " After the 1992 consensus, both the mainland and Taiwan government agreed that there is only One China (One China Policy) and that Taiwan is part of this China. And since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. You said: "Joe Biden doesn't even have one year of being President. " Then let's take the previous U.S President Donald Trump. Did Trump ever visited Guam while as U.S President? You said: _-You said there is no case number regarding Philippines within the UNCLOS website? At least you can read the story about the case and the verdict in here: _ Hey, that's Not the International Tribunal For the law of the Sea, like you claimed earlier this is the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which isn't even a recognized UN agency. Since this PCA is not a recognized UN agency, then China reserves the right not to adhere to its ruling. I mean, you can't even name me the Case No. in the first place, because this was the PCA, not the International Tribunal For the law of the Sea, the two are different organizations. You said: "- Again, you said that China is not currently at war, is just a matter of time." That means China is currently at peace, since you can't name any countries that China is currently at war with. You said: "WHY CHINA NEVER ACCEPTS INVESTIGATORS OR REPORTERS OR JOURNALISTS TO INVESTIGATE IN THOSE CAMPS OR INVESTIGATE THE ORIGINS OF CORONAVIRUS?" BBC Journalists visited those schools and they found nothing amiss and unable to find evidence of any human rights abuses. And why this suddenly morphed into the investigations of the origins of the coronavirus? On 14 Jan 2021, a World Health Organization Team landed in Wuhan to conduct an investigation into the origins of the Coronavirus. The team visited the Wuhan Huainan Seafood Market and their findings indicate that the virus had entered the market from externally. They also visited the Wuhan Institute of Virology and they all but dismissed the possibility of lab leak as highly unlikely.
    1
  23502.  @Castapher  "The United Nations has clarified its relationship with the tribunal in The Hague that gave its verdict on the South China Sea Arbitration. The UN issued a statement on the Chinese micro-blogging platform Weibo, as well as its official website, saying that its principle judicial organ, the International Court of Justice, has had no involvement in the case." Video: UN: Arbitration tribunal not a UN organ youtu.be/eYHsMVrfUx8
    1
  23503.  @Castapher  Video: WHO team arrives in Wuhan for COVID-19 source mission youtu.be/tzW-q4RxzeM A panel of World Health Organization (WHO) scientists has arrived in the central Chinese city of Wuhan. They will cooperate with their Chinese counterparts in the research of the source of SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19.
    1
  23504.  @Castapher  Here's videos debunking the fake news of China building 4 villages in other countries territory. The Indian Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) Bipin Rawat refuted all rumours regarding China building its villages on Indian territory and said that there are no transgressions against the Indian “perception” of the Line of Actual Control (LAC) as of yet. Video: CDS refutes reports of China building villages on Indian territory youtu.be/SvEuPmF0P6g Referring to the controversy over Chinese troops crossing into the Indian side for the purpose of constructing a new village, CDS Rawat said that these reports were “not true” and that although the said villages exist, they are well within the Chinese side of the LAC.
    1
  23505.  @Castapher  Earlier you said: "(China) Constructing villages within Bhutan territory" but Bhutan has dismissed reports of Chinese villages being inside the country after a Chinese journalist posted pictures of a "new village" in Doklam. Video: Bhutan envoy refutes reports of Chinese village in its territory youtu.be/x5knKMmMB-k Bhutan's envoy to India, Maj Gen Vetsop Namgyel in response to a WION question said, "There is no Chinese village inside Bhutan."
    1
  23506.  @dawei666  "You mentioned celebrities but dared not to mention the crackdown on "effeminate" males" Could you give an example of which "effeminate" male actor or celebrity is being crackdown upon in China?
    1
  23507. @North Korea Is Best Korea Explain how did China not support the UN charter? China is neutral in the Russo-Ukraine conflict, China has sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine and is continuing doing business with Russia.
    1
  23508.  @dawei666  "神州 Shenzhou I actually did when u posted this comment elsewhere." Did I ever posted this comment elsewhere? This is the first time that I'm inquiring about the so-called "crackdown on effeminate" males, so I'm asking you if you know of any effeminate actors or celebrities that have been affected. Could you at least name someone and what allegedly happened to this person?
    1
  23509.  @praisethelegendarymessiahs2617  Look at the small population size of Singapore compared to China (the world's most populous country) and of course people rather migrate to smaller population country than a crowded one. Competition for resources, jobs, schools, etc is much higher in China than in Singapore. Singapore is also facing aging population and falling birthrate, that's why their government is wooing foreigners. Furthermore, Singapore was a former British colony so many people speak the language of their colonial masters and that's why they are an attractive destination for Western foreigners, compared to China. And the fact remains that Singapore has been governed by authoritarian single-party PAP for its entire life a nation, for 56 years, similar to China being ruled by CPC for 72 years.
    1
  23510.  @praisethelegendarymessiahs2617  Voted for them? Look at Singapore's President (Halima Yacob) and where is the poll results for Singapore's latest Presidential elections? Who were her opponents and what was the poll results? Yet you think that you have the freedom to vote? And go ahead and vote out the People's Action Party one day, that will most likely cause Singapore's downfall. The opposition parties in Singapore are a joke, they exist primarily to make the PAP look good that's all, so that Singapore people vote for the PAP. Have you heard of the latest scandal by Singapore opposition member of parliament Raeesah Khan? She literally cooked up a fake story in your government.
    1
  23511.  @praisethelegendarymessiahs2617  Apart from the Communist Party of China (CPC) 中国共产党（中共）, China has 8 other political parties including: -China Zhi Gong Party (CZGP) 中国致公党（致公党） -Chinese Peasants' and Workers' Democratic Party (CPWDP) 中国农工民主党（农工党） -China Democratic League (CDL) 中国民主同盟（民盟） -Jiusan Society (JS) 九三学社 -China National Democratic Construction Association (CNDCA) 中国民主建国会（民建） -China Association for Promoting Democracy (CAPD) 中国民主促进会（民进） -Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League (TDSGL) 台湾民主自治同盟（台盟） -Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang (RCCK) 中国国民党革命委员会（民革）
    1
  23512.  @praisethelegendarymessiahs2617  The Chinese political system is very similar to Singapore's political system. Look, there were literally no elections held for Singapore President Halima Yacob (that's why you failed to tell me the latest Singapore Presidential poll results, because there were none) yet you complain about no freely elected national leaders in China? Singapore's opposition is literally a joke, they exist to make the PAP look good that's all, so the Singapore people vote for the PAP, and it's dominance is such that Singapore is effectively a one-party state, having been under authoritarian PAP rule for 56 years (their whole life as a nation) similar to China being under Communist Party of China (CPC) rule for 72 years. Singapore government also controls all religious activity, you have to apply for government permit. For example, in Singapore, all religious foot processions are banned and this ban was imposed in 1964, after riots. Go ahead and just try to remove the PAP from power. The PAP has several tools at their disposal to get rid of Singaporean dissenters and political rivals. Haven't you heard of Singapore dissident Francis Seow being arrested by Lee Kuan Yew? According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. The government has aggressively enforced a sweeping “online falsehoods” law that permits government ministers to order the “correction” or removal of online content. As for China, the National People's Congress (NPC) elects the President of the People's Republic of China and the Vice President of the People's Republic of China. The NPC also appoints several governmental executives like the Premier of the State Council and many other crucial officials to the central state organs. The NPC has the power to remove the above-mentioned officials from the office.
    1
  23513. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23514. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  23515. German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms while Chinese President Xi is entering his 3rd term.
    1
  23516. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23517. Chinese President Xi is entering his 3rd term, while German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms.
    1
  23518. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23519. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23520. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23521. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23522. According to their constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23523. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to their constitution.
    1
  23524.  @chrisbell238  You claimed India has Western allies, but India did not condemn Russia (much like China) so are the West going after India?
    1
  23525.  @Saurabh_Utter-Pradesh  As a Chinese, I've gotten my information from both China and the West. How much information have you gotten from China? Have you ever been here?
    1
  23526.  @theWebmasterify  "For anyone else, this is propapanda because that dude just regurgitates what the C CP tells him. There is enough proof by Chinese netizen telliing a whole different story:" Cyrus Jansen is showing footage of Chinese citizens stepping up to help other people in need and rescuing them during times of crisis and if you consider this propaganda to paint positive image of China, then don't you think a Chinese netizen telling a whole different story also counts as propaganda, except that it's anti-China in nature?
    1
  23527.  @adoreslaurel  It's a YouTube video link, how can it be a virus? It shows Urumqi's massive development the likes of which many foreigners don't even realise is happening in Xinjiang. Here's a video of Uighurs driving cotton-harvesting tractors in Xinjiang, harvesting truckloads of cotton and yet Western allegations of forced cotton picking in Xinjiang still persist? Video: Xinjiang, China’s top cotton producer youtu.be/ocVn5Cn101M China is one of the largest producers of cotton in the world. The country supplies over one-fifth of the cotton used globally, and about 84 per cent of the Chinese output of the product comes from its western Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region.
    1
  23528.  @adoreslaurel  I'll change it to youtube.com/watch?v=oPuFMooKLaA then, it's still the same video regardless. As for Australia, anti-China sentiment is brewing there, even though Australia is located closer to Asia than America and China is Australia's biggest trading partner. Yet Australian politicians like Scott Morrison are fanning the flames of anti-China sentiment and following US's anti-China stance.
    1
  23529.  @adoreslaurel  Anti-China sentiment is brewing in Australia. Asian-Australians have reported almost 400 racist attacks since the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic, according to the country's leading survey of anti-China racism. Source: Sydney Morning Herald: Almost 400 anti-China attacks since pandemic began smh.com.au/politics/federal/almost-400-anti-china-attacks-since-pandemic-began-20200607-p550a8.html_ "There definitely has been an increase," he said, noting that compared to similar data from the United States, there have been a higher proportion of racist incidents against Asian-Australians than Asian-Americans. The survey, has so far documented 386 racist incidents, including abuse, physical intimidation and spitting. The survey also revealed that roughly 90% of racist incidents were not being reported to police and the vast majority were perpetrated by strangers in public places.
    1
  23530.  @adoreslaurel  How is it the fault of the Communist Party of China that racist Australian take out their anger on Chinese/Asian Australians? You're just blaming China for your problems that's all, rather than address the deep-rooted racism against Chinese, what more needs to be said? Since the 19th century, many Westerners have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-liberal democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future, is simply too frightening for most Westerners to fathom.
    1
  23531.  @adoreslaurel  Li Cunxin is how many years ago? Li was the sixth of seven brothers, born into poverty and had to support his extremely poor family. It was actually thanks to the Communist Youth League that granted Li the opportunity to learn ballet and study overseas. He was offered a full scholarship to study at the Houston Ballet summer school and Li was one of the first students from the Beijing Dance Academy to go to the United States under financial support from the central government of the People's Republic of China. But hey, how does Li repay the kindness by the Communist Party? He defected, and forgot about his poor family, his brothers. Why did Li join the communist party at all, if he wanted to pursue his own selfish interests and don't want to serve his country? Communist members strive to make China better for everyone, not selfishly pursue their own interests after receiving money from the government. And what's this about the government persecuting his poor family and not allowing them to see him? His impoverished parents probably couldn't even afford a ticket to fly over to the United States, it's thanks to China's development that more people are now able to fly all over the world. His parents scaped together what little money they had to send their kid overseas (with additional financial assistance from the government) and he repay their kindness by abandoning them and pursuing his own selfish career? But hey, you're just going to be ignore all the good that CPC did for Li, and just concentrate on bad things that's all. Because Western culture prioritise their own individualism and selfish interests, over the interests of the community and Li Cunxin also became infected with this Western mindset. But you spin a tragic tale in order to somehow pin the blame on the Communist Party, which actually granted Li the opportunity to learn English and study abroad and propelled him to where he is today. …… But that's over 50 years ago, what has racism in Australia today even got to do with Communist Party? Are you going to spin another one-sided tale like you did with Li Cunxin? Can't you see the depth of anti-China propaganda ingrained in you to automatically perceive communists as bad?
    1
  23532.  @adoreslaurel   Firstly, nobody forced Li Cunxin to join the Communist Youth League, he did so of his own accord. Joining the Communist Party of China means that you dedicate your life to helping China, that's what it means to be a communist member. Sacrificing your own personal interests over those of the community. It doesn't mean that you can abandon your own country and selfishly pursue your own interests. It's just like community service for example, it's about doing the necessary but boring cleanup work, to make society better, not about doing what you want. Being a communist party member is about contributing your time and effort to help China, not running away to pursue your own career in another country. Instead of performing for home audiences, Li decided to perform for world audiences, isn't that turning his back on China? Secondly, it's thanks to the Communist Party of China that Li had the opportunity to study abroad. Li was born into poverty in the Li Commune near the city of Qingdao in Shandong province and often had to support his extremely poor family. How could he ever afforded the plane ticket to fly to the USA if it weren't for the government? He was offered a full scholarship to study at the Houston Ballet summer. Li was one of the first students from the Beijing Dance Academy to go to the United States under financial support from the central government. The government sponsored Li's studies overseas yet how did Li repay the kindness by the CPC? He defected on the eve of his scheduled return to China, once his studies were complete. He broke the terms of his scholarship in pursuit of his own selfish interests, instead of repaying the kindness of the central government sponsoring his education. Lastly, regarding his parents, like I said earlier, Li came from an impoverished family, how do you expect that his parents to have the money necessary to fly to America? His parents never had the money to go to Beijing (let alone the USA) so they never saw him dance before. Li Cunxin made so much money in the United States, yet he hardly send money back home to his parents who scraped together what little they had to send their kid overseas to study (along with government financial assistance). But hey, you're just going to ignore the fact that the CPC made Li Cunxin what he is today, because you're immune to anything good that the communist party does for our people. Western mindset is mostly about pursuing your own individual success over that of the community, whereas Chinese mindset is primarily about putting the needs of the community over those of the individual. We can see that with how many Westerners refuse to wear masks in public, because it's their rights to not wear masks and they prioritise their individual rights over the safety of the community, that's different from the Chinese mentality. …… Also how does your Li Cunxin example from 1980s link to the current anti-China sentiment in Australia? How is the communist party to blame for Australian anti-China attacks against Chinese/Asian Australians?
    1
  23533.  @adoreslaurel  Why can't I bring up anti-China sentiment in Australia? With rising reports of racist attacks against Chinese students in Australia, education insiders advised students to choose their study destinations with caution and urged Chinese education authorities to issue an alert for safety risks. Source: Experts call for education alert over Australia amid mounting racist attacks globaltimes.cn/page/202102/1215033.shtml According to China Education Association for International Exchange (CEAIE), a non-profit organization, there have been more reports of Chinese students being abused and beaten in Australia, apparently due to race. There were such reports on three consecutive days in January. A female Chinese student was insulted and beaten in the head by a group of six people in Sydney on January 12. A master's degree student surnamed Wu at Monash University was beaten by a white man after shopping near the campus and had the cartilage in his nose broken the following day. On the evening of January 14, a Chinese student at Australian National University was attacked by a group at a bus station in Canberra, getting serious injuries to his jaw, right cheek and multiple abrasions. The abusers also insulted them with racist words like "chigga." As for Li, like I said, he chose to join the Communist Youth League. That means dedicating your life to helping China, sacrificing your own personal interests for the nation. If Li don't want to be bound by such restrictions, then don't join the communist party then. How did Li perform for China on the world stage? He's performing for USA or Australia on the world stage, not China, so it's clear that he turned his back on China. He choose to pursue his selfish career at the expense of his family, and repaid the kindness by the communist party by defecting to the West and breaking the terms of his scholarship. His family was so poor that they couldn't even afford to travel to Beijing to watch him perform, let send their son to the USA, it was the government that sponsored the Li's education and he never repaid it by dedicating his life to China. But hey, you're just anti-China that's all and refuse to acknowledge the CPC sponsoring Li's education. The Western mindset is to pursue your own selfish interests over the interests of the community, whereas Chinese mindset is to sacrifice your individual interests for the sake of the community. You're the one deliberately blaming the Chinese government when it was they that afforded the impoverished Li the opportunity to study abroad and it was Li that renegaded on his scholarship.
    1
  23534.  @adoreslaurel  Li Cunxin renegaded on his scholarship, do you even understand what the consequences are for doing that? The scholarship pays for his education but bonds him as part of the terms of the scholarship. Li was from an impoverished family, but it was thanks to his parents for saving money and the Communist Party of China for financing his studies overseas. And how does he repay their kindness? By defecting to the West and forgetting his family? He chose selfish fame and fortune, instead of coming back to China and helping out people, because Western mindset is prioritise individual interests over that of the community, whereas Chinese mindset is prioritise the community's interests over the individual. Explain how would Li performing around the world be seen as a Chinese success, when Li himself refused to even come home to China to fulfill his end of the scholarship? He made it rich in the West, did he even bothered to send money back to his poor parents, who scraped together what little they have to send their son overseas? You can't even refute my sound arguments regarding Li Cunxin, you just claim it's wasted talent because you're anti-Chinese collectivist culture and pro-Western individualist culture. And you refuse to admit that the CPC sponsored Li's education. …… Asian-Australians have reported almost 400 racist attacks since the beginning of the pandemic according to the country's leading survey of anti-China racism. Osmond Chiu, a fellow at independent progressive thinktank Per Capita, authored the survey in collaboration with the Asian Australian Alliance and Being Asian Australian. Source: Almost 400 anti-China attacks since pandemic began smh.com.au/politics/federal/almost-400-anti-china-attacks-since-pandemic-began-20200607-p550a8.html "There definitely has been an increase," he said, noting that compared to similar data from the United States, there have been a higher proportion of racist incidents against Asian-Australians than Asian-Americans. The survey also revealed that of the racist incidents, roughly 90% were not being reported to police and the vast majority were perpetrated by strangers in public places. So just because you don't hear stories about anti-China racism around you, doesn't mean that it's not happening, it's being perpetrated against strangers, not people you actually know.
    1
  23535.  @adoreslaurel  Li was part of the Communist Youth League, he could have contributed far more to improving the lives of people in China, rather than pursuing his own self-interests. How exactly did Li performing around the world showcase China's success, you tell me? Normally, when a student gets the opportunity to study overseas but renegades on his scholarship, isn't he repaying kindness by treachery? Li choose to be abandon his family and his country by refusing to return home after completing his studies, because the Western mindset is putting your own selfish interests over those of the community. Whereas the Chinese mindset is to put the interests of the community over the individual. How much money did Li ever sent back to his poor family? They were so poor, they couldn't even afford to visit Beijing, let alone the USA, they spent probably their lives savings sending their son overseas to study. And how did Li repay his parents and the Communist Party that paid for his schooling? By deflecting and running away from serving China, to serve his own self-interests. But hey, you're just downright going to ignore whatever good the Chinese government did by sponsoring Li's education, because that's how one-sided you are. And Li's story was in 1980s, how about the rising anti-China sentiment in brewing in Australia today? How's President Xi Jinping to blame for Chinese/Asian Australians getting attacked by racist Australians? If China really didn't care about the welfare of our people, why would they issue travel advisory against Chinese students wanting to study in Australia for their safety? Source: Chinese students warned of racial attacks in Australia globaltimes.cn/content/1191105.shtml …… Australia fancies itself one of the "Big Boys" like USA, UK and EU. Australia fancies itself one of the rich, powerful Western(ized) country, but in reality, Australia is not as powerful economically as USA, UK, EU, neither is Australia as powerful militarily as USA and NATO. Yet Australia wants to go toe-to-toe with China, knowing that that Australia can't compete economically or militarily? Furthermore, Australia is located closer to Asia than America and Europe, so if any conflict breaks out in Asia, Australia is going to be at the frontlines. Not USA, UK or EU. I don't think Australian politicians like Scott Morrison even understand the geopolitical situation Australia is in right now, and what good does following the US anti-China stance even do for Australia?
    1
  23536.  @adoreslaurel  About China's leader for life, China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership. Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is a disadvantage of USA's short term leadership.
    1
  23537.  @adoreslaurel  But US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits. Even worst, the incoming President might reverse the policies of the previous President. For example, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) was 8 years in the making under the Obama administration, but Trump just cancelled and withdrawn USA from the TPP. All that money spent on TPP goes down the drain like that. It becomes virtually impossible to plan anything spanning 10 years, 20 years, 30 years for the USA because of presidential term limits. This is the disadvantage of American short term leadership. Whereas China can make long-term plans. The Belt and Road Initiative proposed by President Xi Jinping is an example of a long term plan by China that will take many decades (possibly a century) to fully realise. If President Xi's opponents come into the power and cancel the BRI, that would mean billions (even trillions) of Yuan wasted and gone down the drain. Therefore, it is in China's best interests to abolish the presidential term limits so our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership.
    1
  23538.  @adoreslaurel  Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? Can Taiwan compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  23539.  @adoreslaurel  China actually has shortage of police officers, according to statistics, China has only 143 officers per 100,000 people, which is below the international median of 300 police officers per 100,000 people. Source: List of countries and dependencies by number of police officers wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_number_of_police_officers This implies that there aren't enough officers to patrol our streets and keep our cities safe, so the government uses advanced technology like surveillance cameras and facial recognition software to make up for the shortfall on police officers. Instead of deploying 1,000 officers on patrol shifts, the surveillance cameras can look out for crime, day and night, all year round. Surveillance cameras also help reduce corruption and bribery in our police force, since the captured footage does not lie. Overall, the advantages of surveillance systems in China outweighs the disadvantages and as a result, China has become very safe. Young girls feel safe enough to be walking out in the streets late at night and pickpocketing crime has been greatly reduced. The ones who feel unsafe are the criminals themselves. Being safe at night could be considered a form of freedom. Here's some videos of expats in China, talking about how safe it is in China. Video: How Safe is China Really??? youtu.be/J7TJOmqOmaE Video: Is China actually safe? youtu.be/JTtVR3w7VXo Video: Is China a Safe Country? youtu.be/exT3Z0-5fqc
    1
  23540.  @adoreslaurel  The Hong Kong extradition bill was proposed because of a certain incident. A Hong Kong guy named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, and stuff her body in her suitcase, before flying back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice for his crime, but Hong Kong has no extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. Source: The Murder Case That Lit the Fuse in Hong Kong nytimes.com/2019/06/15/world/asia/hong-kong-murder-taiwan-extradition.html That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to Hong Kong extradition laws. Do the HK protestors even know what they are protesting for? Have they read the bill and understood its contents in their entirety?
    1
  23541.  @adoreslaurel  How is Chan going to face the penalty when the Hong Kong Extradition Bill has been dropped? Even now, the Chan is allowed to walk free. Source: Hong Kong man accused of murder walks free as city’s authorities clash with Taiwan counterparts cnbc.com/2019/10/23/hong-kong-man-accused-of-murder-walks-free-as-authorities-clash.html And about people living in sub standard living conditions, you said it, they are slum-like so what's wrong with developer building modern housing complete with running water, gas and electricity for those residents? You want people to continue living in such crumbling houses?
    1
  23542.  @adoreslaurel  About forced evictions, there are many residents who refuse to leave their crumbling houses, and the developers leave them alone, they just build roads around the house and develope the surrounding areas. These hold-out houses are called dingzihu (钉子户) "nail houses" because they are stubborn like nails on a board and China has plenty them. Here are some pictures of of nail houses in China, the residents continued to live in the crumbling houses. Source: China's nail houses: the homeowners who refuse to make way – in pictures theguardian.com/cities/gallery/2014/apr/15/china-nail-houses-in-pictures-property-development So what forced evictions are you talking about when these nail houses are allowed to exist? You're just anti-China that's all. Many Chinese people warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors (just ask the expats living here) but many Westerners are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands with suspicion.
    1
  23543.  @adoreslaurel  From Business Insider Australia here are 15 surreal pictures of Chinese 'nail houses' whose owners refused to cave to developers businessinsider.com.au/china-nail-houses-2015-4/#this-ramshackle-home-stood-on-the-square-in-front-of-a-shopping-mall-in-changsha-in-chinas-hunan-province-in-2007-1 In China, “nail houses” — homes that remain standing despite pressure from real estate developers to sell — have become an increasingly common phenomenon. In the cases of many nail houses, owners are protesting what they see as lowball offers from developers who want to build ambitious, private projects on their land. A law passed in 2007 makes it more difficult for the government to seize land, but conflicts remain. So what forced evictions, when these residents are allowed to live in their crumbling homes and the developers leave them alone, they build up the area around the homes? I have offered pictorial evidence of the numerous nail houses dotted across China, but you still claim Chinese people are victims of a dictorial system? Truth is that you don't care about Chinese people, you want these people to continue living in crumbling "slum-like" houses as you put it, because you can't stand the fact that the Communist Party is making life better for Chinese people.
    1
  23544.  @adoreslaurel  This bridge was built around a house after it's owner refused to move. Local authorities said that alternative housing and cash have been offered as compensation, but were all rejected by the house owner. Video: Chinese city builds bridge around house after owner refuses to move youtu.be/FkePxUA6UE8 She was offered two flats and 1.3 million yuan (US$186,500). But she thinks that's not enough, she wants four flats and 2 million Yuan (US$287,000) So isn't the owner being extremely greedy here? But the developer don't force her to leave despite her outrageous offer, they just build up the area around her house, so what forced evictions are you talking about?
    1
  23545.  @adoreslaurel  China isn't interested in spreading communism like the former Soviet Union (or the USA in spreading democracy by waging wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, etc) President Xi Jinping has publicly told a forum for foreign political groups that China's political system is not for export. Source: President Xi says China will not export its political system reuters.com/article/us-china-parties-idUSKBN1DV4UM “We will not import other countries’ models, and will not export the China model,” Xi said. “We will provide more opportunities for the world through our development,” he said. …… Your last statement is of interest to me. As a thought experiment, what is it that makes you think Communism is not a viable way to run a country? The word "Communism" is somehow like a dirty word in the West, but why? If a country has prospered while being run by a communist party, then what's so unacceptable about it? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  23546.  @adoreslaurel  Why do you jump from topic to topic, from Hong Kong Extradition Bill, to forced evictions, to spreading communism, to Tiananmen Square now? You can't refute my previous points so you constantly change the topic? As for Tankman, we now know from the cameraman himself that his widely-publicised photo was taken from his hotel window the day AFTER the riots, and the tanks were going away from, not into, the Square. The full footage shows the tank stopping before running over Tankman, and Tankman even climbed on top of the tank and banged on its hatch before he was dragged away from the scene. He wasn't run over in the photo like Western media claims. …… And let's face it, what makes you think student protest who haven't even graduated from school, find a job and settle, would know how to govern a country of 1.4 billion people? Deng Xiaoping was the man who introduced economic reforms in 1980s and the protestors were anti-Deng, so what would have happened if Deng was ousted from his position? China's economy would possibly never have taken off and we would never have developed to the level we are today if Deng had to step back from his reforms. And most Chinese people have long gotten over the 1989 protests and moved on, it's Westerners that constantly bring this up again and again for what? Most of China has gotten over it, why haven't you?
    1
  23547.  @adoreslaurel  A long term Harvard University survey has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. Source: Harvard survey finds Chinese satisfaction with govt rises china.org.cn/china/2020-07/17/content_76281590.htm A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. I mean, you're not even a Chinese citizen yourself, then why are you so bothered that according to survey by Harvard University, that majority of Chinese citizens actually support the government?
    1
  23548.  @adoreslaurel  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  23549.  @adoreslaurel  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    1
  23550. China survived 5000 years without democracy, so is there sudden need to adopt it? Modern Western democracy is at most 200-300, so there's no guarantee that is going to last.
    1
  23551.  @DgurlSunshine  You said: "神州 Shenzhou communism OVERPRODUCES FOR Capitalism" Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" (German: Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen). So already, communist thinking is no so much about overproduction, whereas capitalism is driven to create profit even at the expense of the environment in the process.
    1
  23552.  @qinby1182  Agreed. Just take the global inequity in Covid-19 vaccine distribution for example. Because we live in a primary capitalistic world, the rich developed countries are buying up and hoarding the Covid-19 vaccines for themselves, leaving little to no vaccines for the poorer developing countries. Because under capitalism, the resources (i.e vaccines) go to those who can afford it (i.e developed countries). Especially Canada has pre-bought enough Covid-19 vaccines for 5-7 times its population. Just imagine 1 Canadian having access to 5 vaccines, whereas 10 Africans have to fight for access to 1 vaccine.
    1
  23553.  @vivekanandpawar9276  "神州 Shenzhou good joke" Why do you think WTA not respecting Peng Shuai's privacy is a joke? She's clearly fine, but laying low for a while, and we have footage and photos of her attending small gatherings as well as a video call with IOC, where she expressed her desire for privacy.
    1
  23554.  @armedelious9924  "神州 Shenzhou spot the guy being paid by the racist totalitarian ethnostate." You're referring to @vivekanand pawar? Studies have shown Indians to be among the most racist and PM Modi is quite the Hindu nationalist himself.
    1
  23555.  Kilavan Sethupathi  Why is it inconceivable to you that Peng Shuai wants privacy after her previous relationship with a much older man has been revealed? It's quite a natural reaction to keep a low profile until it all blows over, yet the WTA are behaving like the paparazzi and trying to pry into her personal affairs.
    1
  23556.  @HariHari-my7ez  Those Indian soldiers actually succumbed to high attitudes and freezing temperatures at Ladakh, according to Indian media.
    1
  23557.  Kilavan Sethupathi  "神州 Shenzhou privacy? Where is she? Why she is not free to talk?" She's in her home resting and she's avoiding the public eye because her previous relationship with a much older man has been revealed, and she's laying low until the whole thing blows over. But the WTA is behaving like the paparazzi and trying to pry into her private affairs.
    1
  23558.  Kilavan Sethupathi  "神州 Shenzhou she should be saying that...not you..." Peng Shuai wrote an email to WTA, stating that she was resting at home and that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    1
  23559. As a Chinese who speaks English, I understand what you mean about being berated by many Westerners (but not all) when my command of the English language isn't up to their level of proficiency. For example in your comment, you used "Caucasians" to basically describe "white" people, but they get upset if you refer to them as Caucasian. Because to them, it's an outdated term and it specifically refers to people who come from a region called the Caucasus. Perhaps a better term to refer to "white" people is Anglo-Saxon rather than Caucasian?
    1
  23560.  @hangtuah888  "神州 Shenzhou You are incorrect to state that they came from Caucasus. Please opined if you know, for your information Caucasian is not a pejorative term but rather a genus term as in Mongoloid for reference to people from Asia." The term Caucasian is inaccurate and outdated, when used to refer to white people. When I studied English I did learn about the terms Caucasian and Mongoloid, but these terms have since become obsolete. Caucasian is the wrong term to use because it's too vague, it included people from Europe, Western, Central, and South Asia, North Africa, and the Horn of Africa. So if you use the term Caucasian, even Egyptians were considered Caucasian under this old classification. Referring to white people as Caucasian is also not polite. If you are Asian, how would you feel if someone calls you Mongoloid? Personally I would feel that is rude, and probably many Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese, etc would find the label Mongoloid to be rude. The term Mongoloid is even offensive to some in the sense it has a second usage referencing people with Down syndrome, now generally regarded as highly offensive. In the same way, using Caucasian to refer to white people is oftentimes considered rude nowadays. Of course, I agree with you that not all the Westerners are racists or discriminatory. But if Asians want to not be racists or discriminatory, then we need to learn which words are rude/offensive to Westerners, and I'm simply pointing out that the use of Caucasian is outdated. A better alternative to refer to White people would be Anglo-Saxon, in my experience.
    1
  23561.  @hangtuah888  "FYI, Caucasians have never ever in the history of language can referred to people from the Horn of Africa or Egyptians." According to Google: Caucasian race, outdated term referring to peoples originating from Europe and certain parts of Western Asia, Southern Asia, and Northern Africa. If we look at a Map of the African Continent, the Northern parts of Africa includes Egypt .
    1
  23562.  @hangtuah888  When I first studied English, I also learn about the terms Mongoloid, Caucasian, Negroid terms that's often used in anthropology, and yes I know what those terms generally refer to. However there is far more to the world than just anthropology, we have to take a more holistic approach and look at the meaning of these terms outside of an anthropological lens. In the English language, words can become obsolete or even become offensive as the language evolves with the times. Let's take for example, the terms used to denote categories of people according IQ scores by psychiatrists. People with an IQ score of 50–74 are categorized as Morons People with an IQ score of 25–49 are categorized as Imbeciles. People with an IQ score of 0–24 are categorized as Idiots. Those terms were used by psychiatrists denote a category of people with certain corresponding IQ scores, but nowadays, those words have become offensive in nature and are now more commonly used as insults.
    1
  23563.  @abyyy490  Regarding media propaganda, it's a fact that the west has a head start in this field compared to China. After the Germans surrendered in WWII, Goebbels' extensive propaganda apparatus was dismantled by the Americans, and then absorbed into the US's own apparatus to craft anti-Soviet propaganda during the Cold War, and now towards China. They've learned their propaganda techniques from the best there is, whereas China has to start from scratch. As for foreign troop deployment, China has no aspirations of world domination, then why is there a need to deploy troops in international lands and shores with actual military bases? That would be following in the same path that the US is taking right now, which has led the US into numerous overseas wars that are unpopular among Americans back home. Why would China want to head down this same path?
    1
  23564.  @abyyy490  China has no aspirations of world hegemony, then why is there a need to deploy troops in international lands and shores with actual military bases? That would be following in the same path that the US is taking right now, which has led them into numerous overseas wars that are unpopular among Americans back home. Why would China want to head down this same path? Manufacturing is hardly becoming a legacy and neither is the west moving away from it. Trump is promising to bring manufacturing jobs "back" to the USA, because even though the service industry sounds nice, it's far from sufficient. As for IPs, China applies for more patents, trademarks and industrial designs than any other in the world, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators
    1
  23565.  @abyyy490  Manufacturing is hardly becoming a legacy and neither is the west moving away from it. Trump is promising to bring manufacturing jobs "back" to the USA, because even though the service industry sounds nice, it's far from sufficient. As for IPs, China applies for more patents, trademarks and industrial designs than any other in the world, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators Countries by patent applications (2023) 1. China (1,642,582) 2. USA (518,791) 3. Japan (414,479) 4. South Korea (288,001) 5. Germany (133,140) ... Countries by trademark applications (2023) 1. China (7,417,473) 2. USA (849,951) 3. Russia (543,692) 4. India (496,326) 5. Germany (441,310) ... Countries by industrial design applications (2023) 1. China (882,809) 2. USA (69,076) 3. Germany (64,986) 4. Italy (60,486) 5. South Korea (60120) ... (Source: World Intellectual Property Indicators)
    1
  23566.  @abyyy490  Trump is promising to bring manufacturing jobs "back" to the USA how is manufacturing becoming a legacy? As for IPs, China applies for more patents, trademarks and industrial designs than any other in the world, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators Countries by patent applications (2023) 1. China (1,642,582) 2. USA (518,791) 3. Japan (414,479) 4. South Korea (288,001) 5. Germany (133,140) ... Countries by trademark applications (2023) 1. China (7,417,473) 2. USA (849,951) 3. Russia (543,692) 4. India (496,326) 5. Germany (441,310) ... Countries by industrial design applications (2023) 1. China (882,809) 2. USA (69,076) 3. Germany (64,986) 4. Italy (60,486) 5. South Korea (60120) ... (Source: World Intellectual Property Indicators)
    1
  23567.  @abyyy490  How is manufacturing becoming a legacy? The US President elect is promising to bring manufacturing jobs back to the USA. As for IPs, China applies for more patents, trademarks and industrial designs than any other in the world, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators Countries by patent applications (2023) 1. China (1,642,582) 2. USA (518,791) 3. Japan (414,479) 4. South Korea (288,001) 5. Germany (133,140) ... Countries by trademark applications (2023) 1. China (7,417,473) 2. USA (849,951) 3. Russia (543,692) 4. India (496,326) 5. Germany (441,310) ... Countries by industrial design applications (2023) 1. China (882,809) 2. USA (69,076) 3. Germany (64,986) 4. Italy (60,486) 5. South Korea (60120) ... (Source: World Intellectual Property Indicators)
    1
  23568.  @abyyy490  Regarding IPs, China applies for more patents, trademarks and industrial designs than any other in the world, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators Countries by patent applications (2023) 1. China (1,642,582) 2. USA (518,791) 3. Japan (414,479) 4. South Korea (288,001) 5. Germany (133,140) ... Countries by trademark applications (2023) 1. China (7,417,473) 2. USA (849,951) 3. Russia (543,692) 4. India (496,326) 5. Germany (441,310) ... Countries by industrial design applications (2023) 1. China (882,809) 2. USA (69,076) 3. Germany (64,986) 4. Italy (60,486) 5. South Korea (60120) ... (Source: World Intellectual Property Indicators)
    1
  23569. +PRCseparatedChina That was part of the agreement between Britain and China during the Hong Kong handover. According to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 香港基本法第四十五條: The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government The HK candidates nominate themselves, and all the Beijing government does is approve the candidates that's all. The HK Chief Executive is elected by an Election Committee which consists of various HK groups. So in the end, its the HK people that elect their own government and Beijing doesn't get to choose which candidate will win the election. I mean, isn't democracy at its most basic elements, is that people get to vote for whichever candidates they want to?
    1
  23570.  @brandonjohnson4849  Most major countries in the world don't recognize Taiwan's sovereignty, and they recognize Taiwan as part of China, under the One-China Policy. In 2017, even President Donald Trump agreed to honor the One-China policy that Taiwan is part of China, after a phone call made by President Xi Jinping. Trump Tells Xi Jinping U.S. Will Honor ‘One China’ Policy nytimes.com/2017/02/09/world/asia/donald-trump-china-xi-jinping-letter.html
    1
  23571.  @brandonjohnson4849  If the people of Taiwan look at Hong Kong and go "that's definitely what we want.", then like I said earlier, China has offered to extend the One Country, Two Systems policy to include Taiwan as well isn't it? Also, didn't the pro-independence DDP lost badly in the last Taiwan midterm election? The DPP suffered major defeat and lost 2 cities to the KMT opposition, even the pro-independence Taiwan President Tsai resigned as a result of this humiliating defeat. So doesn't that imply that majority of people of Taiwan don't want independence? Given that they voted against Tsai?
    1
  23572.  @nathanb5579  What is their reason then?
    1
  23573.  @brandonjohnson4849  1) Sarcasm doesn't translate well in text. How do you know when someone is being sarcastic online? 2) Taiwan president Tsai Ing-wen resigns as chair of ruling DPP after losses in local polls TAIPEI: Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen resigned as leader of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) on Saturday (Nov 24) after the pro-independence party suffered major defeats in key mid-term polls, a blow to her prospects for re-election. "As chairperson of the ruling party, I will take complete responsibility for the outcome of today's local elections," Tsai told reporters. "I resign as DPP chairperson. Our efforts weren't enough and we let down all our supporters who fought with us. I want to express our most sincere apologies."_ Source: channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/taiwan-president-tsai-ing-wen-resigns-dpp-election-defeat-10965412?cid=h3_referral_inarticlelinks_24082018_cna Your points (3) and (4) seem to contradict each other. How do you know for sure the people of Taiwan would not accept a "One Country Two Systems" agreement, if election's usually go back and forth? Are you labeling me a CCP bot for using logic in my posts and quoting articles, when you yourself don't?
    1
  23574. @brandon johnson 1) Sarcasm doesn't translate well in text. 2) "As chairperson of the ruling party, I will take complete responsibility for the outcome of today's local elections," Tsai told reporters. "I resign as DPP chairperson. Our efforts weren't enough and we let down all our supporters who fought with us. I want to express our most sincere apologies." Source: channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/taiwan-president-tsai-ing-wen-resigns-dpp-election-defeat-10965412?cid=h3_referral_inarticlelinks_24082018_cna Your points (3) and (4) seem to contradict each other. How do you know for sure the people of Taiwan would not accept a "One Country Two Systems" agreement, if election's usually go back and forth?
    1
  23575.  @frankburklin1116  The video of the welding of doors was because some people who tested positive kept on leaving their homes, so some people took extreme measures like welding the door. But the irony is that the windows could still be opened.
    1
  23576.  @Andy-P  "Are all Chinese cities like Shanghai then." That's like saying are all UK cities like London then. Or that all US cities are like New York. I don't understand the point of your comparison here.
    1
  23577. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23578. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  23579.  @誠駒谷  China is actually the world's most populous country, so what millions being killed are you talking about?
    1
  23580.  @誠駒谷  Did you know that under Chinese government leadership, China's population actually doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates plummeted? Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm While Chinese government isn't perfect (which government truly is?), it has done well to turn China from dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy, the manufacturing hub of the world, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd largest military budget. And its all achieved under CCP leadership.
    1
  23581.  @ashyslashy5818  Video: Trump: Jamal Khashoggi 'Enemy Of The State' youtu.be/3fhIAjAWxFU
    1
  23582.  @norvikgrigorian4518  "Is China a democratic country? Let me know!" There are many ways to define democracy. One such definition is a government of the people, by the people, for the people. In this sense, the US is not a democracy, it's a plutocracy, with a government of the one percent, by the one percent, for the one percent. Because the U.S government just isn't able to deliver what the people want. On the other hand, China's government has lifted millions out of poverty, made China into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory, having world's 2nd largest research spending, as well as being protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. Because the Chinese government are able to deliver what the people want, so in a sense, isn't China more democratic?
    1
  23583.  @norvikgrigorian4518  Surveys in China have revealed that a vast majority of Chinese support the Chinese government. Whereas Joe Biden's approval ratings have fallen significantly. One definition of democracy is that the government is able to deliver what the people want, so isn't China in a sense, more democratic than the US according to this definition?
    1
  23584.  @norvikgrigorian4518  People go to the USA because America has loose immigration restrictions. As long as a immigrant has family member/relatives who are American, it means they themselves are eligible to apply for US citizenship.
    1
  23585.  @norvikgrigorian4518  "神州 Shenzhou between your democracy and ours, I will choose USA!" Have you paused to consider what made you think this way? Even though US claims to be a democracy, why is it that their government is unable to deliver what the Americans want? Whereas China's government is able to deliver economic growth and alleviate poverty, then can't it be said that Chinese government is able to deliver what the people want?
    1
  23586. Georgia's President was born in France and even though her party lost, she refuses to step down from her position, all in the name of "democracy." Looks like it's only democratic when her party wins.
    1
  23587. China's ghost cities are slowly being filled up over the years, as millions of people migrate from the rural areas to the urban centers. For example, in 2011, London's Daily Mail reported that Zhengzhou was China’s largest Ghost City. But fast forward till today and Zhengzhou has a population of 12,600,574 inhabitants with a total GDP of 1.014 trillion (RMB) in 2018. Here's a video of Zhengzhou:youtu.be/jFdLkgDS-QE?t=8
    1
  23588. China's ghost cities are slowly being filled up over the years, as millions of people migrate from the rural areas to the urban centers. For example, in 2011, London's Daily Mail reported that Zhengzhou was China’s largest Ghost City. But fast forward till today and Zhengzhou has a population of 12,600,574 inhabitants with a total GDP of 1.014 trillion (RMB) in 2018.
    1
  23589. China's ghost cities are slowly being filled up over the years, as millions of people migrate from the rural areas to the urban centers. For example, in 2011, it was reported that Zhengzhou was China’s largest Ghost City. But fast forward till today and Zhengzhou has a population of 12,600,574 inhabitants with a total GDP of 1.014 trillion (RMB) in 2018. Here's a video of Zhengzhou:youtu.be/jFdLkgDS-QE?t=8
    1
  23590. In 2011, it was reported that Zhengzhou was China’s largest Ghost City. But here's a video of Zhengzhou today:youtu.be/jFdLkgDS-QE
    1
  23591. Here's a video of Zhengzhou:youtu.be/jFdLkgDS-QE?t=8
    1
  23592. Second mistake is to believe that America is their ally.
    1
  23593. Another was to believe that USA is their ally.
    1
  23594. They've made another by believing that USA is their ally.
    1
  23595. They've made another by believing that USA is their friend.
    1
  23596. No doubt, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  23597. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China indeed.
    1
  23598. Indeed, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23599. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, no doubt.
    1
  23600. +Joniquaz gurl I said "presumably" in that statement didn't I? How can anyone actually prove whether an individual is actually conservative or liberal? You would have to be able to read minds in order to know someone's true stance. The closest physical evidence would be the individual's actual "actions" which in this case, is the tragic shooting in a gay club by this gunman. Just like how you presuming that he is possibly gay. But according to sources, dozens of other witnesses said that they had never seen Mateen at the nightclub. A spokesperson for the owner of the Pulse nightclub, called the statement that Mateen had been a regular patron "untrue and totally ridiculous". Also, if you are a gunman planning an attack at a gay nightclub, won't you disguise yourself and condition yourself so as to successfully infiltrate your target site prior to your attack? He could be possibly gathering intelligence in those places and planning his assault to inflict as much damage as possible, but that does not necessarily mean he was gay. All in all, I never claimed actual proof, I only cited Orlando shooting as an example of how LGBT in America is not viewed favorably by everyone in America. I do not want such shooting to happen to America, and neither do I want such tragedy to happen to China as well, and hope that China can learn from this tragedy that's all.
    1
  23601.  Roman empire  China has always been under authoritarian rule (and we still are today) so what's wrong with our form of government? China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has seen the rise and fall of many empires (including the Romans) and yet, we survived the violent passage of time to the modern day, relatively intact. So doesn't this imply that authoritarianism works for China, as it did for thousands of years? Not every country has to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of it.
    1
  23602. @Conscience Observer Why don't you contribute something to the discussion, instead of constantly insulting me?
    1
  23603. @Conscience Observer Why don't you attempt to refute my points instead of insulting me?
    1
  23604. @timtommersen I quote sources support my arguments, why don't you attempt to refute my points instead of just dismissing them entirely?
    1
  23605. Louisana Crayfish. And Chinese love those, we consume 90% of the world's crayfish every year and its not even native to China. Video: How Louisana Crayfish Became China's National Dish youtu.be/Jyk-thHca90
    1
  23606. I heard that President Trump actually praised the abolishment of presidential term limits. “He’s now president for life. President for life. No, he’s great. And look, he was able to do that. I think it’s great. Maybe we’ll have to give that a shot some day.” Trump told reporters at MaraLargo
    1
  23607. +Dumbledores Army The Uighur weren't even originally Muslim! And they had their own Uighur traditions prior to Islam invading Xinjiang and forcing them to convert to Islam. Just search online for pictures of "Uighur Girl" online, and look at how beautiful they look in their traditional clothes. Why cover up their pretty faces with ugly Muslim headveil?
    1
  23608. +Dumbledores Army Again, you make up accusations that you are unable to prove. Which well-educated Uighur women has been detained by Chinese government? Where is your actual proof?
    1
  23609. +Dumbledores Army My proof is just search for pictures of "Uighur Girl" online and you can see how beautiful they look in their traditional Uighur costume. Why Islam can invade Xinjiang and force its people to convert to Islam, and make them wear the ugly Muslim headveil? Today, China is merely undoing the damage Islam did to Xinjiang centuries ago.
    1
  23610.  @truthboom  You said: "You rather Zelenskky play by Putin playbooks and made his politicial opposition disappeared," What are you talking about? There exist political opposition in Russia, and in the 2024 Russian election, apart from Putin there were 3 other candidates on ballot paper.
    1
  23611.  @jeffguarino2097  You said: "NATO is a defensive force and he knows they have no reason on earth to invade the Russian Federation." NATO is NOT a defensive organization. They bombed Yugoslavia in 1999, even though Yugoslavia did not attack any NATO member first, so how can you call them defensive in nature? They can attack any country without themselves first being attacked, that's why Russia considers NATO a hostile organization (especially since Russia is not permitted to join) as it is against Russia's security interests.
    1
  23612.  @Cbd_7ohm  "The pipeline was blown up by Ukraine." Lol, why would Ukraine blow up the pipeline? What's the motive? And Germany continues to pledge more aid to Ukraine? In fact, wasn't it Biden who wanted the destruction of the pipeline and for Germany to purchase expensive US LNG instead of cheap Russian gas?
    1
  23613.  @jeffguarino2097  You said: "Yes NATO is defensive but they have other functions." They bombed Yugoslavia in 1999, even though Yugoslavia did not attack any NATO country first, how does that make NATO a defensive organization? NATO also had a military intervention in Bosnia, even thought Bosnia did not attack any NATO member prior. They've shown through their actions that they can attack any country without first being attacked, that's why Russia considers them a hostile organization. "How many times did NATO attack the Russian Federation in all of history ? Hint (zero)." Doesn't change the fact that NATO has attacked other countries (without first being attacked) so how does that make NATO a defensive organization? Russia may be next in their sights, yet you keep on claiming they are a defensive organization?
    1
  23614.  @jeffguarino2097  You said: "Putin even had stray bombs and drones hit Poland" What are you talking about? The missile that strayed into Poland's territory in 2022 was a Ukrainian S-300 missile, even according to US Intelligence assessments. The Polish Prosecutor's Office stated that the missile was fired by the Ukrainian army and hit Polish territory.
    1
  23615.  @watzup62  "The people who are running the USA right now would never have blown up that pipeline." Hard to say. In Dec 2024, Trump posted on Truth Social that the EU must buy more US oil and gas or face tariffs. Blowing up that pipeline was how they got Germany to switch from cheap Russian gas to expensive US gas, and the current US administration is benefiting off Nordstream's destruction.
    1
  23616. Cyrus talks of the media trying to divide Americas, yet he thinks that Trump's election is probably the "worst thing to happen to this country", (even though nearly half of U.S voters voted for him) then isn't he seemingly partaking in similar attempts to widen the divisions?
    1
  23617.  @theworldsbroken  The so-called Chinese "debt-trap" has been debunked as a myth, by experts. The narrative wrongfully portrays both Beijing and the developing countries it deals with. Research has shown that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country._ ... Source: There Is No Chinese 'Debt Trap' - The Atlantic
    1
  23618.  @theworldsbroken  Because China's debt trap is a myth. Research has shown that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country.
    1
  23619.  @ShuCarolina  Did you know that Western society made use of slaves from Africa, that they caused genocide of Native Americans (and Australian Aboriginals) and occupy their territories even till today? The brutal colonization of Asia (i.e India, Hong Kong, Singapore, etc) and African countries and plundering of resources like gold from those lands?
    1
  23620. Chinese corporations are controlled by the Chinese government for the benefit of the country. American corporations control the American government for profit.
    1
  23621.  @pop-4567  About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    1
  23622. Ukraine's war crimes of killing 14,000 of its own citizens (mostly ethnic Russians) in the Donetsk and Luhansk region has gone unpunished by the West for 8 long years. Too long.
    1
  23623.  @arcarcon4620  China has been under communist party rule, and mainland China is world's 2nd largest economy today, and still growing, whereas Hong Kong's economy is ranked 34th in the world and is currently in a slump today. What happened to Hong Kong's previous prosperity under British colonial rule?
    1
  23624. China ina sees on average some 500 protests every day over a wide variety of grievances, including corruption, forced evictions, unpaid wages, human rights abuses, environmental degradation, ethnic protests, petitioning for religious freedom and civil liberties, protests against one-party rule, as well as nationalist protests against foreign countries. In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010 (or an average of 493 protests every day in 2010).
    1
  23625. The irony is that the West makes up only 14% of the world's entire population, yet they think that they can dictate terms for the other 86% of the world's population and call it democracy.
    1
  23626. Singaporean maid-owners also sometimes mistreat their Filipino maids, by pouring scalding water over them, beating them with sticks, locking them up in their room and starving them. Singaporeans also discriminate against Chinese workers, who come to your country to work, help you build your roads and buildings, drive your buses and trains, but you treat Chinese people like unwelcome foreigners. If you Singaporeans are so capable, why not do the hard work yourselves? Why not hire Singaporean maids, and drive your own buses and trains yourselves? Is it because your Singaporean salaries are so high, so you can't afford to hire your own people?
    1
  23627. China actually invited Mike Pompeo to visit Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region and inspect the re-education centers himself. Source: China Invites Pompeo to Visit Xinjiang, Says There Are No Rights Abuses newsweek.com/china-invites-mike-pompeo-visit-xinjiang-no-rights-abuses-1518294 But Pompeo has declined this offer.
    1
  23628.  @wongmee  Too bad many Americans don't know that, they still think China does not allow Westerners to be visit Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region.
    1
  23629.  @mlight6845  You said:_"sailing is not the equivalent to firing live rounds."_ Again, I never said they were the same, but that it is fair. And again, it's precisely because of where Australia sailed their warships through – the Taiwan Strait. You said: "The Chinese ship was significantly more aggressive than the Australian ship." Both were warships, how is one significantly more aggressive than the other? Was anyone hurt? You said: "If someone walked by you with a gun in their holster, would you feel the need to retaliate by firing a gun nearby?" They literally walked into your backyard (i.e the Taiwan Strait) then can't a warning shot be fired off? What is Australia's warship doing in the Taiwan strait in the first place, you tell me? You said: "I work in a city where I regularly see people openly carrying guns, and never once has the thought crossed my mind to shoot a gun to re-establish fairness." And I live in a place where guns are banned and nobody carries guns. I mean, what has your experience with open guns even got to do with the geopolitical situation between China and Australia? You think just because you work in a place where guns are carried openly, means everyone has to think like you?
    1
  23630.  @mlight6845  You're the one repeatedly saying that I claim sailing a ship (specifically a warship) is the same as live fire exercises, when I never said they were the same, only that it is fair. You're the one claiming you come from a city where guns are carried openly, well it's not the same where I live. Australia sailing warships through the Taiwan strait (of which Australia recognises the island as part of China) it's only fair that it was met with a live fire exercise by the Chinese navy.
    1
  23631. A recent survey for kids showed: Most Chinese kids' dream: Astronaut Most American kids' dream: YouTuber
    1
  23632.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  The topic is about Real people ... real discussions made with respect, so how does my statement not pertain to the topic?
    1
  23633.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Is making snide remarks about me the only thing you're capable of? I happen to share the same views as this Weibo post, then what seems to be the problem?
    1
  23634.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  I mean, if you talking to me apparently gives you a headache, then why'd you continue to reply to me? And with snide remarks no less...
    1
  23635.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  Why do you continue to reply to me if apparently you don't like what I say? You don't actually appear to contribute anything to the conversation except insults against me.
    1
  23636.  @jaydee6268  Indeed people like @Senior Sergeant Tom Croydon who just insult others just because others views happen to differ from theirs, this attitude is nauseating.
    1
  23637.  @大象大头  I see. But the Western tourists didn't seem interested in this Cambodian being able to speak multiple languages (because most Westerners don't care about Cambodians) and it was left to Chinese businessman to sponsor his education.
    1
  23638.  @yaoliang1580  So since corruption exists in every country (including Singapore with transport minister Iswaran's case) why are you deliberately singling out Philippines and India as "shining examples of corruption, cronyism and nepotism"? You think Singapore doesn't have those as well? Singapore's current Prime Minister is the son of Singapore's first PM Lee Kuan Yew right?
    1
  23639.  @tjallingdalheuvel126  The colonizers not only colonized lands, but they also colonized the local people's minds, through cultural interaction and education systems. Even after the colonizer left, the local people's minds remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. This is the essence of the colonial mentality that continues to influence non-white people's decisions even till today.
    1
  23640.  @yaoliang1580  "You must be living in lala land" I've pointed out that corruption exists even in Singapore (as with the Iswaran case) but you just ignored it then aren't you the one that's divorced from reality? Why is it you can make such derogatory remarks about India and Philippines (calling them "shining examples of corruption, cronyism n nepotism") but you get so angry when I point out an actual case of corruption in Singapore? It's like you refuse to accept reality at all.
    1
  23641. That's the Republic of China 🇹🇼 flag which is the exiled government fled to in Taiwan. Sometimes, people make mistake thinking that Taiwan is a different country, but according to Taiwan's own constitution, Taiwan is part of China under their constitution.
    1
  23642.  @hoodwiser7652  "- it was an act not dissimilar to John Cena’s sniveling apology" John Cena made a mistake, yet he was man enough to admitted to it and apologized for his mistake (in Mandarin Chinese no less) then how was it a sniveling apology?
    1
  23643.  @Iris-tv8eq Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    1
  23644.  @Iris-tv8eq  "I would say, I'm proud of my country. Because of our freedom and democracy." Lol freedoms? A Taiwan-born K-POP singer has to apologise for her mistake, yet you preach about freedoms? If you claim Taiwan is a country then why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations and the World Health Organization? Is there something that's preventing Taiwan from joining the UN and the WHO?
    1
  23645.  @Slickspace29  Because most countries all over the world recognize the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 as China and not the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949).
    1
  23646.  @porksterbob  Since Taiwan is clearly unable to change its constitution, then you're just shown that Taiwan clearly isn't independent after all, since they can't declare independence. Legally, the husband and wife are still married in the eyes of the law. And according to John Oliver's poll at 18:17 it's apparent that the people who want independence only constitute a small number in Taiwan. Majority of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo to continue. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  23647.  @porksterbob  That poll at 18:17 clearly shows that the majority of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo, the independence faction makes up less than 6% so how is that the biggest faction? And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China and since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  23648.  @porksterbob  If you add 3 and 4, that's already 55% and more than half of the people of Taiwan prefer the status quo to continue (either indefinitely or decided later).
    1
  23649.  @porksterbob  You said: "Taiwan is part of the REPUBLIC OF CHINA under the REPUBLIC OF CHINA's Constitution. But the mainland uses the PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA Constitution. Two different entities." Both the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and the Republic of China 🇹🇼 claim Taiwan as part of our territory, and since the 1992 consensus, both sides have agreed to One China Policy. Since ROC can claim the mainland as part of their territory, then can't PRC claim Taiwan as part of our territory too? "If the mainland wanted to go back to being the REPUBLIC OF CHINA with a legislative Yuan and a multiparty democracy, they could and then they could credibly claim that Taiwan is part of the ROC." Again, why can't PRC (mainland) claim Taiwan as part of our territory, if ROC (Taiwan) can claim the mainland as theirs? Why did ROC even lose the mainland to the PRC and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist KMT had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists' right to rule China.
    1
  23650.  @porksterbob  So you're saying that Taiwan doesn't even have control over their own constitution? Then it just shows Taiwan isn't an independent country after all, since they don't even have sovereignty over their own constitution for crying out loud. The 1992 consensus hasn't formally changed since 30 years ago, so since Taiwan can claim all of mainland China as part of their territory, then can't mainland China do the same to Taiwan? "Basically, Taiwan would love to stop claiming the mainland, but they also don't want to die." Do you have proof to support this claim of yours? According to the poll at 18:30 it shows that only a minority (5.6%) of the people of Taiwan want independence, and that the majority (87%) of the people of Taiwan favor the status quo. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China, and that any move to formally declare independence would be taken as changing the status quo, an outcome that the majority do not favor. "Now, as to the legality of the claims... The ROC is older than the PRC. 1911 vs. 1949." Most of the world recognize the PRC as the real China over the ROC. Just recently, the Solomon Island and Nicaragua switched recognition of Taipei to Beijing, so what has the age of ROC even got to do with the legality of the claim? "Now, the reasons the KMT lost the civil war are complex, but a lot of it boils down to the fact that the KMT fought Japan" When Imperial Japan invaded Manchuria, KMT leader Chiang kai-shek was reluctant to fight the Japanese, instead he continued purging communists (our fellow Chinese) instead of meeting the invaders head on. Until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap Chiang and get him to ally with the communists. This incident was later known as the Xi'an Incident. Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was thanks to communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release. If not for that, Chiang would most likely have been killed for his refusal to fight the Japanese.
    1
  23651.  @小粉紅很吵別鬧上海人  Why are you accusing me of being a chatbot?
    1
  23652.  @porksterbob  That's because those Taiwan separatists want to separate Taiwan from the mainland, even though those separatists are in the minority (only 5.6% want independence in the poll at 18:30 ) whereas the majority (87%) of the people of Taiwan want the status quo to continue. And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China, and that any move to declare independence would be seen as changing the status quo; an outcome that majority of people in Taiwan polled do not support. And the fact that Taiwan doesn't even have control over their own constitution, clearly shows Taiwan is not an independent country, since they don't even have sovereignty over their own constitution. Even in the Olympics for example, Taiwan cannot participate under their own name, they have to use the name Chinese Taipei. If war breaks out between Taiwan and the mainland, that would be seen as the continuation of the previously unresolved Chinese Civil War. And during civil war of course Chinese would be killing Chinese. Just like during the American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans. Or Koreans killing Koreans during Korean War. Or Vietnamese during Vietnam War, or any civil war for that matter. Lets take Imperial Japan out of the picture of the Chinese Civil War then. When Japan surrendered at the end of WWII in 1945, the strength of the KMT forces were: -2 million (regular) -2.3 million (militia) (June 1946) Whereas the Communist only had a strength of -1.2 million (regular) -2.6 million (militia) (July 1945) ... Source: Wikipedia: Chinese Civil War So even after WWII, the total KMT forces still outnumbered the communists, yet despite this numerical advantage, the KMT still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, starving communists and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communist's right to rule China. "I already went into the better polling from the nccu election study center higher up the thread. But the basic thing is that Taiwanese people don't want to start a war with China, not that they don't want to be independent" Those that want to be independent are only no. 5 (25.8%) and no. 6 (5.6%) of which makes up only 31.4% which is still a minority.
    1
  23653.  @porksterbob  "Remember, Chiang kai shek had served in the Japanese army before Ww1." That could have been the reason why Chiang was reluctant to fight the Japanese, because he personally served in the Japanese Army. "Mao would have preferred to kill Chiang kai shek," Just as Chiang wanted Mao and the communists purged.
    1
  23654.  @porksterbob  There's an article online entitled: 11 Things You Should Know About Chiang Kai-shek that talks about how Chiang is a divisive figure. As the leader of KMT, Chiang purged communists from KMT ranks, which allowed him free reign to give himself what amounted to dictatorial power over much of China. His own generals (Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng) had kidnapped him after some sections of the army felt that Chiang spent too much time worrying about maintaining his power in the party when he should have been focusing on the Japanese invasion of Manchuria. And it was actually thanks to communist goodwill that saved Chiang's leadership, after Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu convinced the officers to release Chiang and allow him to take control of the government once again, though they made him agree to stop his campaign against the Communists and to lead the fight against the Japanese. The ironic thing is that although the Communist General Mao was responsible for much of the damage inflicted upon the Japanese, it was Chiang who got the credit mainly from Britain and the US, who saw him as the legitimate leader of China. But when civil war broke out in China, Chiang expected help from the allies, but his Western 'friends' abandoned him, as the US and Britain were reluctant to get involved in a civil war, preferring instead to encourage a peace deal between the two sides. When KMT fled the mainland to Taiwan, Chiang ruled Taiwan with an iron fist, holding the Taiwan presidency for 25 years, and imposed martial law on Taiwan for 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Chiang also suppressed local Taiwan culture by forbidding the use of local languages and, during a period known as ‘White Terror’, his party was responsible for the imprisonment of 140,000 Taiwanese. These people were taken captive for their alleged opposition to the KMT. At this time, anyone openly criticizing the ruling party was deemed a Communist sympathizer. (John Oliver even corroborates this at 6:27 )
    1
  23655.  @porksterbob  So Chiang's generals had their own powerbase, well was that because those soldiers did not support Chiang? Then it goes to show how disunited the KMT was that they had factional infighting. And the Communists had much smaller forces than the KMT, so they resorted to tactics that would enable a smaller force to take on a bigger opponent (such as guerrilla tactics) and they worked. According to the article I prescribed earlier, Mao was responsible for much of the damage inflicted upon the Japanese, but it was Chiang that gotten the credit. And if you think the KMT did the fighting against Japanese, consider the 1938 Yellow River Flood, which was an artificial flood created by the Nationalist KMT in an attempt to halt the rapid advance of Japanese forces. The KMT deliberately destroyed dikes along the Yellow River, causing massive floods that destroyed villages, killing 400k-900k and created 3 million refugees. It has been called the "largest act of environmental warfare in history" and an example of scorched earth military strategy. And again, lets take the period after WWII when the Japanese surrendered. After 1945, the KMT had a total strength of 4,300,000 (June 1946) whereas the communists had a total strength of 3,800,000 (June 1945) so the KMT still outnumbered the communists. Yet despite their numerical advantage, the KMT still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, starving communists and had to flee to Taiwan. And mind you, this was after 1945, so there was no more fighting the Japanese as an excuse. You've accepted Taiwan being under martial law for a long time, yet why are you accusing the mainland of being such? Taiwan was actually at it's most prosperous under authoritarian, single-party KMT rule, then can't the mainland prosper too under such a system? The Great Leap Forward was China's first attempt to industrialize and modernize our country. But it was bad weather like flood that caused destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. How can that be compared to the White Terror of Taiwan? If anything, it's possible that in the hypothetical scenario that Chiang had defeated the communists in the mainland, there would be a similar White Terror in the mainland under Chiang, conducted on a larger scale than in Taiwan (given that the mainland is bigger territory than Taiwan)
    1
  23656. Olaf Scholz should be investigating who's behind Nordstream if they want to know who's responsible for the current state of Germany.
    1
  23657.  @rampage241  But overland trade is less risky than maritime trade, especially given the crisis in the Red Sea.
    1
  23658.  @MarkYeung1  Yet 70 countries all over the world import Bibles that were Made-in-China, so what anti-Christian persecution is there to speak of? Clearly their governments had faith enough in China to buy their Bibles. In China, the government is controls the religions, whereas in some other countries, it's the reverse and the religion actually control their government.
    1
  23659.  @MarkYeung1  Yet 70 countries import Bibles that are Made-in-China, so what anti-Christian persecution is there to speak of? In China, the government is above religion, and so long as people don't practice religious doctrine or activities that have been deemed harmful to others or the state, then people are free to practice. I mean, unless they're part of a cult that worships Satan or something like that, the government in China will leave believers alone.
    1
  23660.  @MarkYeung1  What are those underground churches so afraid of? The fact that they have to hide just goes to show that their teachings have deviated greatly from the mainstream forms of Christianity. China's government doesn't tolerate unregistered Christians to espouse their syncretic version of Christianity, but as long as they worship mainstream acceptable versions of Christianity, then the government will leave them alone.
    1
  23661.  @MarkYeung1  What are those underground churches so afraid of? As long as Chinese Christians register themselves with the proper authorities, then the government will let them practice their religion in peace. But if their religion has deviated from the mainstream acceptable versions Christianity that they have to resort to underground churches, then the government will not permit their activities to bring harm to others or to the state. Because in China, the government is above religion.
    1
  23662.  @MarkYeung1  What are those underground churches so afraid of? As long as Chinese Christians register themselves with the proper authorities, then the government will let them practice their religion in peace. But if their religion has strayed from the mainstream acceptable versions Christianity that they have to resort to underground churches, then the government will not permit their activities to bring harm to others or to the state. Because in China, the government is above religion.
    1
  23663.  @MarkYeung1  In China, religions are tolerated but they can never be allowed to supersede the government of China. Historically, people have often hijacked religion for political purposes, such as Hong Xiuquan (洪秀全) whom in 19th century Qing Dynasty, had proclaimed himself as "Son of God" and "Brother to Jesus". Born into a Hakka family in Guangzhou, Hong claimed to have experienced mystical visions after failing the imperial examinations. He came to believe that his celestial father he saw in the visions was "God the Father," his celestial elder brother was "Jesus Christ", and he had been directed to rid the world of demon worship. His associate founded the God Worshipping Society (拜上帝会) which amassed over 10,000 followers and eventually, Hong organized a rebel army and rebelled against the Qing, marking the beginning of the Taiping Rebellion. The Taiping Rebellion was one of the bloodiest civil wars in China, with a death toll of 20-30 million people in China. Can you imagine the same civil war happening again in China, all in the name of Christianity? This is the reason why in China, the government is above religion and that religion can never be allowed to supersede the government.
    1
  23664.  @MarkYeung1  In China, religions are tolerated but they can never be allowed to supersede the government of China. Historically, people have often hijacked religion for political purposes, such as Hong Xiuquan (洪秀全) whom in 19th century Qing Dynasty, had proclaimed himself as "Son of God" and "Brother to Jesus". Born into a Hakka family in Guangzhou, Hong claimed to have experienced mystical visions after failing the imperial examinations. He came to believe that his celestial father he saw in the visions was "God the Father," his celestial elder brother was "Jesus Christ", and he had been directed to rid the world of demon worship. His associate founded the God Worshipping Society (拜上帝会) which amassed over 10,000 followers and eventually, Hong organized a rebel army and rebelled against the Qing, marking the beginning of the Taiping Rebellion. The Taiping Rebellion was one of the bloodiest civil wars in China, with a death toll of 20-30 million people in China. China will not let such a civil war happen again in China, all in the name of religion. This is the reason why in China, the government is above religion and that religion can never be allowed to supersede the government.
    1
  23665.  @MarkYeung1  In China, religions are tolerated but they can never be allowed to supersede the government of China. Historically, people have often hijacked religion for political purposes, such as Hong Xiuquan (洪秀全) whom in 19th century Qing Dynasty, had proclaimed himself as "Son of God" and "Brother to Jesus". Born into a Hakka family in Guangzhou, Hong claimed to have experienced mystical visions after failing the imperial examinations. He came to believe that his celestial father he saw in the visions was "God the Father," his celestial elder brother was "Jesus Christ", and he had been directed to rid the world of demon worship. His associate founded the God Worshipping Society (拜上帝会) which amassed over 10,000 followers and eventually, Hong organized a rebel army and rebelled against the Qing, marking the beginning of the Taiping Rebellion. The Taiping Rebellion was one of the bloodiest civil wars in China, with a death toll of 20-30 million people in China. Can you imagine the same civil war happening again in China, all in the name of Christianity? This is the reason why in China, the government is above religion and that religion can never be allowed to supersede the government.
    1
  23666.  @MarkYeung1  In China, religions are tolerated but they can never be allowed to supersede the government of China. Historically, people have often hijacked religion for political purposes, such as Hong Xiuquan (洪秀全) whom in 19th century Qing Dynasty, had proclaimed himself as "Son of God" and "Brother to Jesus". Born into a Hakka family in Guangzhou, Hong claimed to have experienced mystical visions after failing the imperial examinations. He came to believe that his celestial father he saw in the visions was "God the Father," his celestial elder brother was "Jesus Christ", and he had been directed to rid the world of demon worship. His associate founded the God Worshipping Society (拜上帝会) which amassed over 10,000 followers and eventually, Hong organized a rebel army and rebelled against the Qing, marking the beginning of the Taiping Rebellion. The Taiping Rebellion was one of the bloodiest civil wars in China, with a death toll of 20-30 million people in China. Can you imagine the same civil war happening again in China, all in the name of Christianity? This is the reason why in China, the government is above religion and that religion can never be allowed to supersede the government.
    1
  23667.  @MarkYeung1  Yet 70 countries all over the world import Bibles that were Made-in-China, so what anti-Christian persecution is there to speak of? Clearly their governments had faith enough in China to buy their Bibles. In China, the government is controls the religions, whereas in some other countries, it's the reverse and the religion actually control their government. Yet 70 countries import Bibles that are Made-in-China, so what anti-Christian persecution is there to speak of? In China, the government is above religion, and so long as people don't practice religious doctrine or activities that have been deemed harmful to others or the state, then people are free to practice. I mean, unless they're part of a cult that worships Satan or something like that, the government in China will leave believers alone.
    1
  23668.  @MarkYeung1  What are those underground churches so afraid of? The fact that they have to hide just goes to show that their teachings have deviated greatly from the mainstream forms of Christianity. China's government doesn't tolerate unregistered Christians to espouse their syncretic version of Christianity, but as long as they worship mainstream acceptable versions of Christianity, then the government will leave them alone. What are those underground churches so afraid of? As long as Chinese Christians register themselves with the proper authorities, then the government will let them practice their religion in peace. But if their religion has deviated from the mainstream acceptable versions Christianity that they have to resort to underground churches, then the government will not permit their activities to bring harm to others or to the state. Because in China, the government is above religion.
    1
  23669.  @Huppy1234567  "神州 Shenzhou it’s because China forces UN members to not recognize Taiwan through economic blackmail." Then you've just proven that Taiwan is not an independent country after all, and that the Communist Party of China does exert control over the island. Even Athletes from Taiwan can only participate in the Olympics under the name "Chinese Taipei".
    1
  23670. Qing dynasty kept held China back from modernizing to where we are today.
    1
  23671. He's cosplaying as a Beholder.
    1
  23672. The U.S media used to be about manufacturing dreams for Americans. Now it's more about manufacturing nightmares to keep Americans fearful of perceived enemies.
    1
  23673. U.S MSM is more about manufacturing nightmares than manufacturing dreams
    1
  23674.  @rksleung  You said: "Meanwhile, the CCP was doing all it could enriching themselves during the sino-japanese war." How were the communists enriching themselves? The Nationalist Kuomintang were taxing the peasants heavily and even received U.S aid. But corruption was rampant among the KMT ranks, and they pocketed some $750,000,000 worth of U.S aid, so much such that even U.S President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves." You said: "The constitution was finally rectified in 1948 and the CCP rebels chose to topple the government and the ROC needed to retreat to taiwan." The KMT had previously toppled the Qing Dynasty government in 1911, and was eventually toppled by the communists in 1949. Also, why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the KMT had massive wealth, superior weapons and superior numbers, yet despite these advantages, they still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates the KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communist's right to rule China.
    1
  23675.  @rksleung  You said: "Meanwhile, the CCP was doing all it could enriching themselves during the sino-japanese war." How were the communists enriching themselves? The Nationalist Kuomintang were taxing the peasants heavily and even received U.S aid. But corruption was rampant among the KMT ranks, and they pocketed some $750,000,000 worth of U.S aid, so much such that even U.S President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves."
    1
  23676. SkylineToTheSeaAndMe The USA is the world's most protectionist country. According to Global Trade Ale since 2008 the USA has had over 800 of such protectionist policies, compared to China's 200-300 of such policies. Also, during his presidential campaign Donald Trump promised to label China as currency manipulator, but after President Xi visited him in Maralargo in 2017, he completely change his stance. “They’re not currency manipulators,” President Trump told the The Wall Street Journal during a press conference in the Oval Office in 2017.
    1
  23677. +Fang Leo What about you accessing the western media here then? Aren't you doing that now too? I never said Chinese media is unbiased (in fact, every out there media is) I was merely pointing out the differences in news and tone of the Chinese and Western media. And how is the joint military strike in Syria 'misleadingly' portrayed as superpowers bullying the innocent poor country? Aren't the superpowers much stronger than Syria, yet they are choosing to interfere in the country's internal affairs? And I never said anything about this kind of debate or discussion happening on Weibo, but I don't see why the Syrian conflict can't be discussed in Weibo without it being taken down.
    1
  23678.  @Down-South  "never buy any food made in China." China can feed 20% of the world's population with just 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_producing_countries_of_agricultural_commodities
    1
  23679.  @jdheryos4910  If you disagree with my explanation, then why don't you present your explanation?
    1
  23680.  @JoelBergmark  Just like how the US often claims to have "legitimate security interest" in Ukraine, of all places. They'll come up with any excuse as long as it gets the tax payer's money flowing.
    1
  23681.  @plaguedoc7727  那是因为在中国很多穷家庭没有足够的收入来养活多个孩子，所以在某种程度上，中国的独生子女政策可以说有点好处。
    1
  23682.  @tbz707  I watched serpentza's video and if the email leak was true, that means that Cyrus Janssen had previously published his video entitled: "Americans Don't Know The Truth About China" and CGTN approached him to ask for permission to publish HIS video on their website. So he actually published his video before CGTN approached him to ask for permission to use his video.
    1
  23683.  @Rasyad95  So what's the point of claiming China force them to learn, when Indonesia also force them to learn as well? As for your previous question, the communist government is corrupted, and previous leaders have led corruption grew to such levels. But at least under President Xi Jinping there are ongoing efforts to combat graft within the Chinese communist party.
    1
  23684.  @Rasyad95  Another bad thing about China is that we have a problem with pollution, bad air quality, because of our over reliance on coal power. But at least the Chinese government is working to make the switch from fossil fuel to renewable energy. Already, China built the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dams to help generate renewable green energy to reduce our reliance on coal. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtube.com/watch?v=b8cCsUBYSkw
    1
  23685.  @sirvidia  The survivor herself wasn't pregnant so how can she know for sure that the pregnant women entering the schools had forced terminations?
    1
  23686.  @sirvidia  China today is hardly communist, and most people agree that China is in fact more capitalist than even some Western countries.
    1
  23687.  @mohamadaliffshafiqazizan2788  干嘛骂粗话？
    1
  23688.  ShitGotReal  LOL, what has being Muslim even got to do with sterilization? Islam is not a race, and it doesn't propagate through population birth, so what's your correlation here?
    1
  23689.  @kathyngai640  It's our country our rules. The Americans have been separating kids from parents, having deported more than half a million illegal parents from their kids since 2009. Their kids grow up to become orphans in America and their parents have low chance of ever seeing their kids again. Source: The U.S. has deported more than half a million parents since 2009. washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/09/21/this-is-what-would-happen-to-the-children-of-11-million-illegal-immigrants-if-president-trump-deported-them/ Wheras in Xinjiang, both the Uighur kids and parents are receiving a proper Chinese education. And they are still in Xinjiang, so they will be able to see each other once they graduate from their respective schools. What's your problem with China's education system?
    1
  23690.  @sirvidia  Who's destroying their culture? The Uighurs weren't even originally Muslims in the first place, and Xinjiang was part of China before Islam itself was born. Only later did the Islamic invaders conquered the region and converted the Uighurs to Islam. Just search online for pictures of "Uighur Girl" and see how beautiful they look in their traditional Uighur garb. Why Islam wants to cover up Uighur women's natural beauty with the ugly, black, Muslim headveil? That's not the real Uighur culture.
    1
  23691. Well, why don't you call for the Freeing of Southern Philippines (Mindanao) while you're at it?
    1
  23692.  manny12176  So the infected within can just escape quarantine and spread the virus elsewhere?
    1
  23693.  manny12176  Who said that the hospitals built in China were a place for people to die? There's so many videos of Chinese doctors and nurses treating patients in hospitals, well equipped with face masks, gloves, goggles, faceshields, PPE suits (with hoods) etc. Whereas the American doctors and nurses look ill-equipped in comparison.
    1
  23694.  @abyyy490  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  23695.  @Sean-giang  What's that even got to do with anything? Whoever they vote in Taiwan, their government hasn't formally declared independence, which means that Taiwan is still part of China under the One China policy.
    1
  23696.  @Sean-giang  Where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence then? You claim it's independent yet why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Why is it that athletes from Taiwan can only participate in the Olympics under the name "Chinese Taipei"?
    1
  23697.  @Sean-giang  We've already gone through this. Even the athletes from Hong Kong can score medals without being included into mainland China's tally. The same goes for the athletes from "Chinese Taipei", but it doesn't change the fact that Hong Kong and Taiwan are part of China. Even you use the term "Chinese Taipei," acknowledging that Taiwan island inalienable part of China.
    1
  23698.  @Sean-giang  Now you're just making stuff up. Both the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China claim to be the same country, China. What 2 countries 2 systems are you talking about? Yet you're calling me "silly" when you're the one making baseless claims?
    1
  23699.  @Sean-giang  Athletes from Hong Kong can still score medals separately from mainland China's medal tally. The same goes for athletes from Taiwan (who use the name Chinese Taipei to show that they are part of China). This refutes your point about Chinese Taipei scoring medals separately since China allows Hong Kong to do the same. And you claim Taiwan is not part of China, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there some outside force that's preventing Taiwan from joining the UN?
    1
  23700.  @Sean-giang  Why'd the Republic of China lost the mainland to the People's Republic of China and fled to Taiwan island? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang held numerous advantages such as more wealth, more weapons, and more numbers over the Communists. Yet despite numerous advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. In the end, the United Nations can't ignore the fact that PRC is the real China, which is why the UN voted to recognize PRC as China and to remove Taiwan from its UN position.
    1
  23701.  @Sean-giang  Before I answer your question, it's apparent that you've repeatedly refused to answer my earlier question: Why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Because the answer is the PRC that's preventing Taiwan from joining the UN, which just goes to show that Taiwan isn't independent after all, since it's PRC that's controlling Taiwan at the UN.
    1
  23702.  @Sean-giang  Again, you keep saying that, but why can't Taiwan declare independence? Where is Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Even the athletes from Taiwan can only compete in the Olympics under the name "Chinese Taipei" so how is Taiwan an independent country?
    1
  23703.  @Sean-giang  Look, for example, even though the Falklands Islands are a self-governing, they are still recognized as a territory of Great Britain, and it's the UK government that is responsible for its foreign affairs. It shows that a country's main government doesn't have to govern all its territories, yet the territory is still considered to be part of the country, just like how Taiwan is considered by major countries all over the world as part of China under the One China Policy.
    1
  23704.  @Sean-giang  Back when ROC was still in mainland China, the Communists were mostly from the poorest regions of China (i.e the rural countryside). Their numbers were small and they weren't as well-equipped as Nationalist KMT, who had wealth (taxed from the poor peasants) received funding and equipment from foreign powers like USA, and even had superior numbers to boot. Despite their advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland and fled to Taiwan, so how is ROC the real China? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing CPC's right to rule China. Even the UN voted to recognize PRC as China in 1971.
    1
  23705.  @Sean-giang  Correct, the Falklands aren't a separate country (even though they are self-governing) just like how Taiwan isn't a separate country (even though they are self-governing). You've just showed that a territory that's self-governing doesn't mean it's an independent country.
    1
  23706.  @Sean-giang  That's because China's approach to reunification is through peaceful economic integration, and will only exercise the military option as a last resort, only when all other options are exhausted. Taiwan's ability to hold out stems from (perceived) US support. But it's no secret that the US is in decline and China is rising. Time is on China's side, and as long as peace prevails, the US will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer challenge China's rise, by which then the support for Taiwan will evaporate, and reunification becomes the only outcome.
    1
  23707.  @Sean-giang  How is it sovereign? Over 180 countries recognize Taiwan as part of China under the One China policy. Even the US in the 1972 Shanghai joint Communique with the PRC, acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China and does not challenge that position.
    1
  23708.  @Sean-giang  Clearly, you've acknowledged that a self-governing territory like Falklands is not a separate country, then how is it you're claiming a self-governing territory like Taiwan is a separate country? It's apparent that your argument has already been dismantled.
    1
  23709.  @Sean-giang  Why should China "test" the Taiwan Relations Act? As I've stated, China prefers reunification through economic integration instead of military confrontation, and will only exercise the latter as a last resort. And since the US is declining while China is rising, there will come a point in time in the future when the US is no longer able to challenge China's rise, by which then their support for Taiwan will evaporate and reunification becomes inevitable.
    1
  23710.  @MarkYeung1  The Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence in 1946 that the Spratlys was not Philippine territory, both to not anger Chiang Kai-shek in China and because the Spratlys were not part of the Philippines per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America. Source: War or Peace in the South China Sea books.google.com/books?id=CNVf9R_L5FAC&pg=PA11&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false The Philippines gained independence in 1946, but when nationalists within the Philippine government wanted to claim the Spratlys, their American advisors discouraged them. The Spanish-American Treaty of 1898 made it clear that the western limit of the Philippines island did not include the Spratlys, and the United States was not keen to carry the cost of a Philippine irredentist adventure that might bring conflict with Chiang Kai-shek's regime in China.
    1
  23711.  @wt6426  When Covid-19 first emerged in December 2019, there was no indication of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus back in 2019. The first human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus was confirmed only in 20th January 2020 and that's when the government began implementing quarantine measures shortly after. Source: China confirms human-to-human transmission of coronavirus theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/20/coronavirus-spreads-to-beijing-as-china-confirms-new-cases
    1
  23712.  @lll3069  If by the doctor, you mean Dr Li Wenliang, he was spreading rumours about the coronavirus being SARS (which is clearly untrue, the Covid-19 is not SARS) so the government stepped in to stop the spread of unproven rumours. And there was no indication of human-to-human transmission of Covid-19 back in 2019, the first confirmed human-to-human transmission case in China was confirmed only on 20th January 2020 and that's when the government began implementing quarantine measures shortly after. Source: China confirms human-to-human transmission of new coronavirus aljazeera.com/news/2020/01/china-confirms-human-human-transmission-coronavirus-200120162507948.html (Dated to 21st Jan 2020) The government is acting based on actual information gleamed on the ground, not rumors and hearsay.
    1
  23713.  @SonicPhonic  America is actually dependent on China for almost 80% of its medicines, which is especially important given the current situation. Fox Business reports that according to FDA estimate at least 80 percent of active ingredients found in all of America’s medicine come from abroad, primarily from China. And it’s not just the ingredients, China wants to become the world’s dominant generic drug maker. So far Chinese companies are making generic for everything from high blood pressure to chemotherapy drugs. 90 percent of America’s prescriptions are for generic drugs. Source: U.S. is Dependent on China for Almost 80% of Its Medicine saraacarter.com/u-s-is-dependent-on-china-for-almost-80-of-its-medicine/ So why do you want to ban trade with China? America depends on China for medicines in order to combat the coronavirus, so why'd you want ban trade will our country?
    1
  23714.  @USAlove.tsmc.NotYou  大哥，我的评论已经在这三年了。。。
    1
  23715. +Han According to this source: "Indonesia have sunk 317 boats since 2014, and another 191 are waiting" asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/International-Relations/Indonesia-to-continue-blowing-up-illegal-fishing-vessels So what gives Indonesian government the right to destroy other countries' fisherman's livelihood? Chinese government don't destroy other countries property by blowing up their ships, so what gives Indonesian government the right to do the same to Chinese fishing vessels? +Park Minje What about South Korean coastguard firing machine gun at Chinese trawlers? atimes.com/article/south-korean-coastguard-fires-chinese-trawlers/ Because of such serious hostile actions, Chinese coastguard has to venture out to protect our fishermen. Chinese fishermen have been fishing in these waters before your countries attained independence, so why suddenly Chinese fishermen considered fishing illegally?
    1
  23716. +Park Minje Chinese fisherman have been fishing there for many years, so why is it suddenly illegal according to South Korea? Also, you think Chinese fishermen fishing illegally, would try to ram an armed coastguard? No, they would try to flee if they spotted the coastguard, and the Koreans probably cook up an excuse of "fisherman ramming their boats" to excuse the firing of machinegun rounds.
    1
  23717. +Park Minje According to the source, there were some 30 Chinese vessels, so why are each and every one of them assumed to be fishing illegally? People who fish in illegal waters want smaller numbers of boats to minimize being spotted and arrested by the authorities. So why the presence of 30 large trawlers automatically means they are in illegal waters? The South Korean coastguard is just interfering in waters that Chinese fishermen have fished for generations. +Han So does that give Indonesian government the right to destroy other countries' property? Which country in the world explodes other fisherman's livelihood, simply for supposed illegal fishing?
    1
  23718. +Andrew Clements First off, how do you know if it is S. Korea's territorial waters exactly? It was in Yellow Sea, which is located between China, North Korea and South Korea, according to the following map ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/304/media/images/59936000/gif/_59936011_southkorea_yellowsea04302012.gif You think fisherman are herd animals or something? Such a large group of fishing vessels, implies that it is well-known fishing grounds for Chinese fishermen, which is possible reason why they were there so brazenly. What makes you think grouping together would catch more fish? Won't the fish be scared off by presence of so many ships? You are support Indonesian government for destroying property belonging to other people? And South Korean coastguard can open fire on bows of Chinese fishing vessels? It is apparent that you people are simply biased against China for illogical reasons. Chinese coastguard don't explode other country's boats and neither do they open fire at fishing vessels so who are you people to judge when Chinese coastguards emerges to protect our fishermen from other countries?
    1
  23719. +Park Minje So you still believe 30 Chinese ships all had faulty GPS and all of them simply strayed into Korean waters? You are the unreasonable one claiming Chinese fishermen were there illegally, when there is no proof, except from Korean coastguard only. Trawlers may be illegal in other countries, but they are legal in China so what is wrong with Chinese fishermen deploying trawlers in our own waters? You are the one refused to read the article at all, before jumping to conclusions. Those ships that usually trespassed into illegal waters are small wooden boats, not 30 Chinese trawlers.
    1
  23720. +Park Minje That's right they aren't small vessels. So why would Chinese fisherman take such big sluggish trawler go fishing in illegal waters, instead of taking small boats that are more maneuverable and easier to escape with? And to have 30 big trawlers go fishing illegally at the same time? Who would believe such things? You are the one read news articles without thought and just blindly accept the article for what it is. You don't apply any logic to the situation and don't look beyond the surface to digest the implications. Tell me why 30 big Chinese trawlers are automatically assumed to be illegally fishing, when trawlers make poor escape vessels.
    1
  23721. Why are all you people accusing me being 50 cents, just for simply pointing out how ridiculous it is for 30 big Chinese trawlers to be fishing in supposedly "illegal waters" in same time? Why take big sluggish trawler to fish illegally, instead of small, fast, maneuverable boat that easier escape with? Are my questions so illogical here? You people constantly mock and insult me for applying my logic to the news article, while you people just blindly accept it without questions. Why don't you people attempt explain why 30 trawlers are there in the first place, instead of mocking me here for my reasoning? You have no answer to this simple question, so you label me 50 cents instead? Also, no one else has voiced out Indonesian government blowing up fishermen's livelihood and some people have even expressed support for Indonesia's actions. I mean, which other country does the same thing to Indonesia's fishing vessels? Nobody blows up Indonesian fishing boats, not even China, yet you people casually overlook it and some even approve of it? You people have shown no respect and constantly mock me for being critical, while disregarding the actions of Indonesian government and so on. So what makes you people think you are justified? By labelling me 50 cents? You people are simply biased against me just because my views differ from yours.
    1
  23722. +Park Minje You are outright lying about Chinese government lack of reaction. You think South Korean Coastguard opening fire with machinegun on Chinese vessels is going to be taken lightly? According to following source, Chinese foreign affairs ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying, said China was “strongly dissatisfied” at the action and urged Seoul to “discipline” its coastguard. Beijing ‘strongly dissatisfied’ after South Korean coastguard fires machine guns at Chinese trawlers independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/china-south-korea-fire-fishing-boats-response-a7398186.html You blame me being ignorant and biased, but you can't even address my simple questions? Why did 30 Chinese trawlers suddenly "decide" to fish illegally, and why did they take sluggish trawlers instead of smaller faster vessels? You refuse to answer this reasonable question, but proceed to insult and mock me? You think Korean coastguards are the only victims? According to above source, three Chinese fishermen were killed in a fire when the Korean coastguard tried to apprehend them in September 2016, so who is being biased here by thinking that only South Koreans have been hurt? You people just resort to ridiculing me just because you are unable to answer my questions at all.
    1
  23723. +Park Minje Who here is promoting the use of violence, like deploying machineguns against unarmed vessels and exploding other countries fishing boats? As far as I know, I am the only one actively objecting to Indonesian government blowing up fishermen's livelihoods. Others are indifferent or even expressing approval at Indonesian government's actions so who are you keep on insulting me for simply presenting logical points? As for Chinese marine environment, what do you know about China's fishing industry? China accounts for 1/3 world's fish production and 2/3 worlds fishing farms so who are you to look down on our fishing industry? China has to feed the world's largest population after all and the government slowly increasing the number of fish farms and promoting aquaculture in order meet the demand.
    1
  23724. +Park Minje So what did those fishing vessels did to Indonesia, to warrant getting exploded? You are the one promoting needless violence like opening fire with machineguns and expressing support for Indonesian exploding other ships vessels, so what makes you justified in your views here? Because they were against Chinese vessels? "Real robbers" do not drive big, sluggish trucks to trespass and rob other people and not in big groups of 30. They drive small, fast getaway cars instead. So why are you still avoiding the fundamental question here, and just blindly accept the news instead of being critical here? Korean coastguards still fired dangerously at the bow of Chinese ships in the end, so again, why are you justifying their actions here?
    1
  23725. Who are you accuse me writing comments for living? I still wrote less comments than mister Park Minje here so why are you blaming me? And yes, those trawlers were not small so why accuse them of illegal fishing? Won't fishermen use smaller ships to escape authorities, if they want to fish in illegal waters? Also, how does that explain the bold presence of 30 of such trawlers? If those waters truly illegal, than 30 of such large ships would definitely stick out like sore thumb. I have used logic in my arguments, and presented my own stance regarding use of violent methods, like firing machineguns and exploding other fishermen's ships. But you people constantly mock and insult me, dismiss my sources, ignore my questions and act indifferent or show approval towards violent methods? What makes you people think you are justified here?
    1
  23726. +Park Minje Why have you resort to abusing vulgarity against me? Small fishing boats may stand better chance of evading the coastguards, but not the big trawlers, so why would Chinese fisherman take big trawler to go fishing in illegal waters in first place? And why take 30 of them too? It doesn't make sense for Chinese fisherman to fish in illegal waters, while using big trawlers and having so many numbers makes it even more obvious. That is why how do you really know that the waters there are Korean waters in the first place? Because Korean coastguard says so?
    1
  23727. +Park Minje So why don't you explain why 30 big Chinese trawlers are all fishing illegally then? You mock me and abuse profanity means you are correct? You can't even explain why there are so many big trawlers in supposedly illegal waters, but you resort to attacking me personally instead of attacking my points? Chinese government also never confirmed that those fisherman were fishing illegally. Chinese government only protest South Korean Coastguard use of force, so why are makes you think that they are automatically justified in their use of violent methods?
    1
  23728. +Park Minje You refuse to analyse the mindset, and just blindly believe the news, automatically means you are justified? Who is the one being critical of these reports by asking questions here? Who is the one endorsing violence like South Korean coastguard opening machinegun fire on unarmed Chinese vessels, or Indonesian government's exploding of other country's property? You mean your views differ from mine, gives you the right to abuse profanities and mock me? How does that justify your opinion, because you stoop to using vulgar language?
    1
  23729. Park Minje What proof exactly? You have contributed nothing but insults and vulgarities that's all. And you are the one endorsing violence such Korean coastguards use of machine guns against unarmed vessels and Indonesian government exploding other countries fishing boats. Indonesian fishermen have been fishing illegally in Australia too, but you don't see Australian government blowing up other peoples properties.
    1
  23730. Park Minje Why continue abuse vulgarities against me? I don't use such words against you. Also, knife is very common fishermen tool, used for cutting nets or gutting fish so why is it justified to use machine guns against these people. Every fishing vessel has knife of some sort, so you classify all of such vessels as "armed" ships to justify use of machine guns?
    1
  23731. +Park Minje So are you proposing to ban all fishermen from using knives? How do you expect them to work then? Golf club and umbrella can also serve as weapon, so should they all be banned? Coastguard are expected to handle cases of non-compliance, but not to use unnecessary force, like machinegun unless the situation calls for it. How is South Korean coastguard opening fire on defenseless fishermen such a situation? Also, who says other countries fishermen do comply when they meet the authorities? In this article, Vietnamese fishermen fled from Phillpines coastguard, and two Vietnamese fishermen were shot to death because of this. nationmultimedia.com/detail/aec/30327597
    1
  23732. +Park Minje Exactly who is the one endorsing violence here? These Vietnamese fishermen only fishing to make living, so they deserve death as punishment is that what you are trying to say? You really approve the use of machineguns, shooting to kill and Indonesian government exploding boats as legit? I already demonstrated that other country fishermen will also run given such scenario, such as the Vietnamese fishermen. Who would even be stupid enough to comply? Will you get lighter sentence if you surrender to coastguard? Indonesian government will still blow up your boat, nevertheless. You really lack an analytical brain or even any common sense, and really just blindly believe everything that news feed you. Yet you still abuse me with foul language and call me ignorant?
    1
  23733. 那些战忽局的，其实都自娱自乐的。我说的话应该不会影响他们的工作。
    1
  23734. Milton Waddams But the Chinese fishermen did not shoot at the police. Even if they surrendered peacefully, Indonesian government still exploded the boats. You claim I am arrogant, when you are the one endorsing the use of violence here, such as firing machine gun against unarmed fishermen by Korean coastguards? Which country besides Indonesia is destroying other countries property by exploding fishermen's livelihood?
    1
  23735. Park Minje My statement was that the "Chinese fishermen did not shoot at the police" so how is this statement considered wrong at all? Ramming is not shooting and knives, shovels and spears are common tools for fishermen (they are fishermen after all) so what is wrong with fishermen possessing such implements? You mean you consider all those fishing vessels to be armed because of those tools alone? All you people shown so far is that you lack common sense and label me arrogant, when you people seem to endorse violence such as firing machine guns and exploding other people's properties that's all.
    1
  23736. Park Minje When did I ever said that at all? All I said was that violence methods should not be promoted over here, but you people resort to abusing vulgarities, insulting me and labelling me 50c, simply for expressing my views so what makes you people justified over me? I don't use such language or insults against you people and I am not the one endorsing violence here like you people.
    1
  23737. +Park Minje Who do you think you are now to suddenly demand answers out of me, when you have consistently failed to answer any questions of mine previously? I have previously asked you to explain you think why 30 Chinese trawlers are all fishing illegally at the same time, but you ignored my questions completely. You don't even answer any of my questions, yet now you demand answers out of me here?
    1
  23738. +Park Minje If you refuse to answer my earlier questions asked a week ago, then I think it is fair of me not to answer yours. I have not abused any vulgar language against you or so on, and I have asked thoughtful questions and my stance towards violence is very clear. You on the other hand, have insulted me and abused vulgar language, and consistently refuse to answer my questions, while demanding answers out of me at the same time. And you have consistently endorsed violence, even Indonesian exploding boats, and Philippines shooting to death Vietnamese fishermen. So what makes you think that you are justified here?
    1
  23739. Zhi Hzccz Agreed that the fishes not defined by borders and can easily swim freely to escape nets, leading the fishermen to stray into different areas. Also, countries sea borders are not well defined, despite GPS technology and it is difficult pin point exactly where is the real boundary out in the ocean.
    1
  23740. +Park Minje Fishing by trawling need only be carried out by one or two vessels at most, so there is no need for "large groups" of trawlers like you said. 30 of such Chinese trawlers is definitely an excessive group for supposed "illegal" fishing like you claim.
    1
  23741. +Park Minje You did not answer my question too. Chinese trawlers do not need to travel in such large groups to fish, so why is it assumed that they are all fishing illegally?
    1
  23742. +Park Minje That is not reason to explain the presence of 30 such trawlers. Why would 30 of such large trawlers all go fishing illegally at the same time, when such large numbers would definitely attract attention? It could be possible that they are actually in their own waters, which would explain why so many were fishing there.
    1
  23743. +Park Minje Take a look at this map defining the EEZ of both China and S. Korea in Yellow Sea nature.com/polopoly_fs/7.32618.1450189429!/image/nature_yellow_sea_map_17.12.2015_v2.png_gen/derivatives/landscape_630/nature_yellow_sea_map_17.12.2015_v2.png The above map shows that our EEZ overlap, with RED Line representing South Korea's EEZ and the BLUE line representing China's EEZ. So how is that really proof that the 30 or so Chinese trawlers are all fishing in illegal territory? You really are the type of person that simply blindly believe news article without looking deeper in the issue at all.
    1
  23744. +Park Minje Zhi Hzccz is right in saying that it is matter of the definition of border is different between our countries. As you can see from my previous post, the EEZ of both China and South Korea overlap, so who can rightly say Chinese fishing vessels fishing are in illegal waters here?
    1
  23745. +Park Minje What agreement are you even talking about? China and S. Korea have not reached any agreement regarding our EEZ overlap so what are you talking about? You think you can just blame China for violating supposed agreement and think South Korea is always right? You obviously biased towards China here. Since our EEZ boundaries are not fully defined, then why can't Chinese government make noise about the use of machine guns against unarmed vessels? They could be fishing legally in our own waters, but Korean coastguards just entered our territory and fired upon them. You claim that there is an agreement between China and Korea then what is the name of this agreement and when was it signed?
    1
  23746. +michael junior Confrontation with Chinese navy? Whose ships are the ones going around opening fire with machineguns on unarmed fishing vessels, or exploding fishermen's boats? Whenever did Chinese Navy even fire off a shot at those other countries, or blowing up other fisherman's livelihoods?
    1
  23747. Weird YouTube Name What court ruling are you even talking about? Do any other country in the world explode other countries fishing vessels like what Indonesian government does? As for EEZ I already shown that China and S. Korea EEZ overlap in the Yellow Sea, so what gives South Korean coastguards the right to fire machine gun at fishermen vessels? All you people keep showing is that you endorse violence, making excuses for Indonesian government blowing up fishermen's livelihoods that's all.
    1
  23748. Weird YouTube Name What about Australian coastguards catching Indonesian fishermen fishing illegally in their waters? The Australian government don't blow up other Indonesian fishing vessels just because they fished illegally in their waters. People like you continue to justify violence such as Indonesian government exploding other countries property.
    1
  23749. +Weird YouTube Name Firstly, are you implying that Chinese fishermen are suddenly fishing in illegal waters when those area been fishermen's traditional fishing grounds for generations? Chinese fishermen didn't just suddenly start fishing in illegal waters. And not just Chinese fisherman, but Malaysian fishermen, Vietnamese fishermen, etc, have fished in those grounds for many years without problem. So why suddenly start blowing up all those boats?
    1
  23750. +NANAY MO Like you said, Chinese coastguard only use water cannon not real gun shot, so how is that truly harming Philippines? Did Chinese coastguard kill Philippines fishermen? Look at this article where Philippines coastguard admits to shooting Chinese fisherman rappler.com/nation/28681-ph-coast-guard-admits-shooting-taiwanese Who is the one harming who?
    1
  23751. +NANAY MO Because you only see bad points of Chinese on your countries, and don't look at other countries bad actions on China. This article quoted says the Taiwan government did not accept Philippines apology and instead imposed more sanctions on Philippines, apparently saying it "lacked sincerity". bbc.com/news/world-asia-22535524
    1
  23752. Ivory Billed What military threats are you talking about? USA is the one sending warships and aircraft carrier strike group halfway across the globe to Asian waters in the first place. You hear it in the news all the time.
    1
  23753. The China Observer YouTube channel is just full of videos that portray China in a negative light.
    1
  23754.  Molly Wop Chainsaw  Just because you think that the USA will shoot a nuke as a last resort, doesn't necessarily mean that China will launch nukes as a last resort, and break our No-First-Use policy. And like I said, USA only used nukes on a non-nuclear country like Japan during WWII, not against an actual nuclear capable country like the Soviet Union during the Cold War, or China.
    1
  23755.  Molly Wop Chainsaw  "神州 Shenzhou okay but never say never." You just did.
    1
  23756.  Molly Wop Chainsaw  You've been saying goodbye, bye-bye for some time now, why do you keep on saying that?
    1
  23757.  Molly Wop Chainsaw  But if you're saying goodbye, bye-bye, then why did you still continue to reply?
    1
  23758. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23759. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23760. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23761. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23762. China is a meritocracy where politicians who fulfill their promises get elected into power. The U.S is a democracy where politicians who make the most attractive promises get elected into power.
    1
  23763. China is a meritocracy where politicians who fulfill their promises get elected into power. The U.S is a democracy where politicians who make promises get elected into power.
    1
  23764. German Chanceller Angela Merkel Served 4 terms while President Xi is only entering his 3rd term in office.
    1
  23765. President Xi is entering his 3rd term, but Angel Merkel served her 4th and Germans would have probably voted for her again in the last election.
    1
  23766.  @dondrumpf5422  mark yeung reminds me of those Hong Kongers who have a "colonial mentality" of worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture over others. Even though Hong Kong has decolonised, the "decolonization of the mind" is needed to undo the mental damage inflicted by the colonizer on the minds of the colonized.
    1
  23767. China is closed society (firewall, strict immigration) but our people have an open mind (eager to learn from others) … America is open society (freedom of speech, loose immigration) but many Americans are close minded (stubborn and set in their ways).
    1
  23768. In US pop culture, catchphrases like "F**K THE POLICE" are extremely popular and just promote a lack of respect for authority and make policemen lives more difficult.
    1
  23769. Amnesty International should be calling attention to Gonzalo Lira's disappearance, yet there's hardly a squeak over him going missing.
    1
  23770. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23771. China prioritize saving lives at the expense of business. Whereas the West prioritize saving businesses at the expense of lives.
    1
  23772. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23773. Undoubtedly, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23774.  @everythingandmore5537  You said: "Xi is different. He is president for life. He started belt and road project." China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. The Belt and Road Initiative is one example of a long term plan put forth by China to connect China with Europe and bring development to the landlocked regions in between. Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more.
    1
  23775.  @everythingandmore5537  "神州 Shenzhou Why not put a vote to ordinary Chinese." A long term Harvard University study has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    1
  23776.  @everythingandmore5537  When did I ever said that there are more than 100 million communist members?
    1
  23777.  @everythingandmore5537  "神州 Shenzhou The CCP should have no problem winning the popular vote." Since you agreed that majority of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China, then why should China cast a vote? Waste time, waste money, waste energy, just to prove what's already obvious.
    1
  23778.  @everythingandmore5537  So what? American government does not consist of 300 million people, so it's not the entire American population that runs the government, so what's your point then? Which do you think is more qualified to run the country? The People or The Government? If you selected The People, then why do countries need The Government for?
    1
  23779.  @everythingandmore5537  But why waste money, time and effort to fund an election, when you and I both agree that majority of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China? Why waste the money when it could be put to use elsewhere?
    1
  23780.  @everythingandmore5537  Who said YouTube is banned in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    1
  23781.  @everythingandmore5537  "神州 Shenzhou If you use VPN to log in to YouTube you are committing an offence" Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so? There are many foreign companies that come to China and set up shop here and they require VPN access to operate, so the government issue VPN licence to these companies.
    1
  23782.  @everythingandmore5537  "The american voters will decide who is the president unlike close door Politburo meeting" But what makes you think ordinary Americans are qualified to make important decisions that will impact the country's future? Ordinary people are fickle and they make poor voters for several reasons: -Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (i.e. They may not turn up to vote, or they submit blank votes) -Ordinary people may base their vote on emotions, not logic (i.e. Many British don't like immigrants, so majority voted for Brexit) -Ordinary people are susceptible to foreign influences (i.e. Russian interference in US elections) -Ordinary people may simply lack awareness of the country's real political situation, to make informed decisions regarding the country's future. There's a host of other problems associated with democracy, so why not let those who know how to govern, govern? That's what China is doing and look at how successful China is.
    1
  23783.  @everythingandmore5537  You said: "What's important is china becomes a human rights loving democracy." China's political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  23784.  @everythingandmore5537  "神州 Mao did wise decision? The greatest mass murderer in history" Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong can't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he'll wish for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. Yet Westerners just paint him as mass murderer when those people starved to death unintentionally?
    1
  23785.  @everythingandmore5537   @Everything and More "神州 Shenzhou the free world would not tolerate a totalitarian system that does genocide." What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 … Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  23786. The irony is that Netanyahu can just rebuff Biden's requests.
    1
  23787. Morph Verse But demand for Chinese goods remains high and many people flock to places like Walmart, because of their affordable goods.
    1
  23788. The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
    1
  23789. Except that Daniel Davis believes the Chinese weather balloon was deliberately sent over the USA.
    1
  23790. Except that Daniel Davis thinks the Chinese government deliberately sent that weather balloon over the USA.
    1
  23791. China certainly doesn't go looking for trouble and China most certainly doesn't appreciate trouble. But the US is looking for it.
    1
  23792. Do you have any evidence that Peng Shuai was "reformed" then? On 17 November, Peng allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent, so this checks out with her latest statement that the allegations are false.
    1
  23793.  @firsttimeisawjupiter1031  What makes you think I am a bot, just because someone else copies my comment?
    1
  23794.  @Kenny-yl9pc  China and Korea are against the Japanese enshrinement of Class-A war criminals in Yasukuni Shrine, where the Japanese go to pay respects to fallen heros. Even the late former Japanese PM Shinzo Abe regularly visited Yasukuni. Can you imagine in the West, the equivalent of Hilter being enshrined and worshiped and whether such an activity will be tolerated by the West?
    1
  23795. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  23796.  @bartel8552  Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought.
    1
  23797. Germany and Austria are recognized sovereign country, but most countries in the world do not recognize Taiwan's independence, and they recognize Taiwan as part of China under the One-China Policy. So if war were to break out, it would be considered an internal Chinese Civil war, (or the resumption of the Chinese Civil War of long ago)
    1
  23798. +Backpacker One64 That does not detract from the fact that Taiwan is not recognized as its own sovereign country. Like the uploader's video said only 17 countries in the world recognize Taiwan, so the Taiwan issue is still an internal issue within China. As for watching Youtube, why can't we watch YT? Nowadays, people in China can use VPN to access YT and the police won't arrest you for watching YT videos in China.
    1
  23799. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The Chia 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. 2021. Bloomberg Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n. 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  23800.  @INTJ791  "神州 Shenzhou yeah sure, but later ask vietnamese in cambodia problem, vietnam will be more prosper if conquering cambodia" So you support Vietnam conquering a sovereign country like Cambodia and disposing of its government? Cambodia is China's ally, why should China tolerate what the Vietnamese did to our ally?
    1
  23801. The people of Taiwan need to wake up and realise that USA doesn't care about Taiwan, they are only using Taiwan as a pawn to contain the mainland's rise that's all.
    1
  23802. China's so-called "debt-trap" diplomacy has been debunked by experts. Research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country. Source: The Atlantic
    1
  23803.  @dedoshucos  According to World Intellectual Property Indicators, China applies for more patents than any other country in the world and we also have the world's largest number of granted patents. Patent applications for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (1,542,002 patents) 2. United States (597,141 patents) 3. Japan (313,567 patents) 4. South Korea (209,992 patents) 5. European Patent Office (174,397 patents) 6. Germany (67,898 patents) ... Source: World Intellectual Property Indicators wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Indicators#Patents Patent grants for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (432,147 patents) 2. United States (307,759 patents) 3. Japan (194,525 patents) 4. European Patent Office (127,603 patents) 5. South Korea (119,012 patents) 6. Russian Federation (35,774 patents) ...
    1
  23804.  @s.ludden5700  Granted, the Communist Party of China is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  23805. It's the "Perpetual Foreigner" stereotype that Americans impose on Asian Americans. Even though many Asian Americans are born and bred in America, they are still regarded as foreigners irrespective of how long they've lived in America.
    1
  23806. For videos on the progress of China's reusable rocket launch system, I recommend Dongfang Hour.
    1
  23807. China is expected to graduate from a middle-income country to a high-income country by the end of 2023 in some forecasts.
    1
  23808.  @baonguyen-ct6nj  Cyrus is the channel owner's name. And I agree, I don't see any mockery in quoting that famous quote from that NATO secretary.
    1
  23809.  @viktoriyaserebryakov2755  Funny how this ZeTristan guy feels the need to criticize other people's comments as lacking, while seemingly not contribute any comments of his own.
    1
  23810.  @zetristan4525  You said: "I hope you will create content for people to understand the world more wholesomely. Original thinking (if self-questioning too) is precious." You yourself don't contribute any content that promotes original thinking, in fact all you seem to do is hurl accusations against others who take a different point of view from you that's all.
    1
  23811.  @viktoriyaserebryakov2755  "You should not have asserted such things about Shenzhou without substantiation." Agreed. It appears this ZeTristan guy is unable to substantiate his accusations against me thus far.
    1
  23812. Can'tStumpTheTrump You mean you can suddenly predict the future here, that the WW2 treaty will be rewritten within the next 5 years? Why hasn't the WW2 treaty been rewritten for the last 70 years then? And you think that within the next 5 years it will be rewritten? Last I heard, Japanese people firmly oppose any changes to Article 9 of the Japanese constitution.
    1
  23813. @nickthegreek8884 Edward Snowden released files of the US government monitoring their own citizens conversations.
    1
  23814.  @khanhphaminh1175  Excuse me, but can't I defend a pro-Chinese content creator like Cyrus Janssen? Cyrus Janssen has been to China and he found out that China was nothing like what the Western MSM have been painting China as (in a negative light), and his videos have been about the positive message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" and promoting U.S-China relations, which would not only be good for both our countries, but for the rest of the world as well. If U.S-China relations deteriorates, then all the world suffers, so Cyrus is actively trying to avoid relations deteriorating further. You said: "If Putin has a good reason, why did Putin not dare to attack Ukraine during the time Trump was in power, but had to wait until 8 years later?" Putin had tried other options first, such as diplomacy by calling for all parties to adhere to the Minsk Agreement that would stop the fighting, include a ceasefire, facilitate withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, and institute constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas (i.e Donetsk and Lugansk). But the Minsk agreement was not honored, and shelling in Donbas continued unabated for 8 years (by both sides) resulting in the deaths of 13,000 people. In February, Putin had tried diplomacy again, wanting a formal written assurances that NATO would not expand eastwards (i.e that Ukraine would not be allowed to join NATO). In fact, many NATO countries like Germany and France did not want to admit Ukraine into NATO (citing corruption concerns in it's government) yet they didn't put down this statement on writing to assure Putin. After realizing that all Russia's diplomacy and words had fallen on deaf ears all this time, Putin finally decided to act instead.
    1
  23815.  @wildturtle126  Can't fault Italy entirely for their steep death toll, Italy has world's 2nd oldest population (after Japan at number one) and Covid-19 hits the elderly the hardest.
    1
  23816.  @treks6486  "Lets take some simple points, the house you live in, do you own it? Can you pass it down to your children?" The government leases property to buyers for a certain period. But although I do not live in a Western capitalist country, what I understand is that property owners need to pay the government a "land tax" for owning land. If ever your family that owns the land, is one day unable to pay the land tax, then the government can seize your property for themselves? That means that the landowner doesn't truly own the land after all, if they have to constantly pay taxes to the government, isn't it? "The car you drive, do you own it? Can you sell it and keep the cash?" Do you have to pay taxes when you purchase a car, as well as repeated annual taxes (i.e road tax) if which you do not pay, you're not allowed to drive on the roads? Then again, that doesn't necessarily mean that the car is yours, since car owners need to continue paying the government additional fees in order to keep their cars, isn't it? From what I understand, some countries don't even allow car owners to keep cars beyond a certain "expiry date", they'll either have to be scrapped, or pay an additional fee to continue keeping it. "Simple things like these, we in capitalistic democracies take for granted. Even our Government cannot take away what is legally ours." In some Western countries, the government can seize your property if you're one day unable to pay the property tax, and even with regards to cars, there is a false sense of ownership, when taxes need to be paid.
    1
  23817.  @treks6486  So in your country, what happens if a landowner refuses to pay his/her land tax for 90 years to 999 years? It shows that you don't really own the land if you can't sell it, and you are forced to pay taxes either way. Even after the year lease, your children's children still have to pay the government to "renew ownership" the land. It's how capitalism tricks people into thinking that they own their property or their cars. "during economic hardship, our government abolished the land tax for homes. We don't need to pay land tax anymore." That reprieve could only be temporary given the circumstances, and it doesn't necessarily mean that the government won't start reintroducing land tax for homes once the economy picks up. Even so, most capitalist countries have a land tax of some sort, it shows that there really isn't "true land ownership" after all.
    1
  23818.  @treks6486  "When we buy a car, we pay a sales tax once only. The Government will issue an owner registration card. We own the car. It is our property." Do you need to renew this "owner registration card" ever so often? If so, then you don't really own the car if you have to pay the government just for owning one. You don't own the roads, but people who don't have cars don't have to pay road tax, even though they use the same roads as car-owners. "If we don't pay the fine, we cannot sell the car but the car is still ours." So you cannot drive the car out onto the roads and you cannot sell the car? Then it's practically useless, if your car is just sitting in the garage and cannot be sold or driven. Capitalism is like that, it gives you a false sense of ownership over your property or cars, but if you refuse to pay the government its taxes or dues, then you property or car is basically frozen, until you pay up. "In capitalist countries, we pay taxes to finance the government so that they can provide services for us." The services provided are due to socialism, not capitalism. In most capitalist countries, the rich corporations and CEOs can literally get away with not paying taxes. Recently in the United States for example, there was a leak that revealed American CEOs/billionaires like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffet, George Soros, paid little to no taxes during some years. "Very simple example, Road Tax is used to maintain the roads, house tax is used for garbage collection, street lighting, sewerage treatment, public drains to avoid flooding, ... maintain steady fuel prices for our cars, steady food prices and other essentials." Again, this is due to socialism, not capitalism. The Leftist are the people calling for (usually) more taxes on rich corporations and more support for the needy, whereas it's the Rightists who are (usually) anti-tax on corporations, although this is a generalization. And if anti-flooding measures aren't working, and if fuel prices are rising, it shows that a country is more capitalist than socialist. "You don't pay taxes in China?" We do. The thing is that in China, the Chinese government controls the Chinese corporations for China's benefit. The Chinese government is cracking down on tax evasion (i.e Actress Zheng Shuang fined $46 million and Fan Bing Bing fined $70 million, both for tax evasion), a sharp contrast to American CEOs/billionaires who can get away with not paying taxes. Because in the USA, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government at the expense of ordinary American taxpayers.
    1
  23819.  @treks6486  "On caring for the welfare of the old, sick, infirm, it's not about capitalism or socialism but rather it's about being good decent human beings. Even in the most capitalist societies, you will find kind hearted and generous people who will help those who are less fortunate." Such outstanding individuals are few and far in between. In a socialist society, the burden of caring for the needy falls on the state or the community, whereas in capitalist societies, it falls on a those few individuals. "Private citizens would form non profit non governmental organizations to do many types of social work from environmental to public health to distributing food aid in disaster areas etc. People volunteer to help by donating their time and money." Wouldn't it be even better if the government chips in as well? These socialist policies are (in my opinion) far more important than the pursuit of profit by capitalists.
    1
  23820.  @treks6486  "Why would a land owner refuse to pay the tax?" Because according to you, apparently there's no penalty for not paying the tax and the government allegedly can't seize the property. Then why continue to pay for something to which there is no penalty for not paying? If the government "promise" to let you keep the land for x no. of years, it just goes to show that you don't really own the land if you have to depend on government approval. True ownership of the land is when you absolutely have no need to pay any land tax or to ask the government for any permission, so it just appears that the land owner "feels like he/she is the owner" that's all, when this is just an illusion. "When the title is due, his children has the right to renew the title for a small fee" This another evidence the land doesn't truly belong to the land owner's family, since the children have to pay the government for the right to continue "owning their land." "When the economy picks up, people can afford to pay the land tax." When that happens, then the people will be once again living under the "illusion of land ownership" since they have pay the government for land that they supposedly own. "In China, how do you get a house?" Most Chinese families have a laojia (老家) a family home usually located in rural China, which was bestowed by the communists back during the founding of the People's Republic of China after 1949. After the Chinese Civil War, Chairman Mao Zedong seized the lands from the rich corrupted landlords in China and redistributed the lands among the dirt-poor peasants. For the first time in centuries, many peasant families had land to call their own, instead of having to pay taxes to the rich landlords in exchange for working on lands they did not own. In addition to having a laojia in the countryside, young Chinese couples today can buy houses/apartments in the cities (which tend to be rather expensive) and some even own a 2nd or 3rd property for speculation and investment. But the Chinese government is cracking down on speculative home buying as it may deprives another couple of a home to live in. As President Xi says: "Housing is for living, not for speculation. (房子是用来住的，不是用来炒的。) "
    1
  23821.  @treks6486  "So China has a lot of cars, they all belong to the government?" According to a survey conducted by Rakuten Insight, about 71.4% of the Chinese respondents stated they owned a car. However, China's vehicle ownership rate is still low by international standards at 37.5 vehicles per 100 urban households at the end of 2017. "When I want to sell the car, for say 20,000, I can afford to pay the road tax of say 50 :)" But according to you, you can't sell the car if you don't pay the tax, so how do you get your say 20,000 in order to pay the road tax of say 50? "It's not a false sense of ownership, it's the burden of ownership." You can dress it up all you like, but it is clearly not 100% owned by you. I mean, you literally stated that you cannot sell the car if you don't pay your road tax, that's a limitation imposed that shows that you don't really have full ownership over your vehicle when the government can block you from selling it or doing what you want with it. "If you don't own anything, then you don't have to pay for anything right? I own the thing, I am responsible for the thing, so I pay what is needed." This is what capitalism has been teaching people, and many people have come to accept the so-called "inevitability" of capitalism. But it doesn't have to be the case and history has shown how human societies transition from slavery (master and slave) to feudalism (lords and serfs) to capitalism (employer and employee). Which implies that there might be a transition from capitalism to another system eventually. Karl Marx believes the next transition is communism.
    1
  23822.  @treks6486  "Only in America ya. In most countries, the more we earn, the more taxes we have to pay ya." Corruption, tax evasion and fraud are present in every country to varying degrees. Even the recent Pandora leak has revealed how the rich and famous hide their money in offshore accounts. The corporation create jobs right? So everybody in China works for the government? China's economy is a mix of private foreign corporations, state-owned Chinese companies and privately-owned Chinese firms, so it's not necessary that everyone in China works for the government. "What happens when a factor close down? Do people have some kind of unemployment benefit?" Workers will have to find new jobs if a factory closes down. In 2020, the unemployment insurance minimum standard in China's capital city was 1,816 yuan per month.
    1
  23823. ​ @treks6486  Video: The 'Pandora Papers' shows where the rich and famous hide their money youtube.com/watch?v=CSSPfzF33ug
    1
  23824.  @treks6486  "Corruption exist in every country and I'm sure including China." Under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-corruption crackdowns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But when is the last time a Western democracy had an anti-corruption campaign of it's own? For example in the United States, Hilary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his presidential campaign. But after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption. "I was speaking in general terms. Generally, the more you earn, the more you pay taxes. This is true for masses of people." While it may be true for the masses, it ain't so for the rich people like those exposed in the Pandora leak. "Since you are obviously against private ownership, what does "privately-owned Chinese firms" mean?" What has my being against private ownership got to do with the definition of that term? Did I ever mention that I am against private ownership in my previous comments? "Who owns this insurance? Who runs it? Do you have to pay a contribution every month? What happens if you don't have this insurance?" China’s Social Security System consists of 5 mandatory insurance schemes (pension fund, medical insurance, industrial injury insurance, unemployment insurance, and maternity insurance) + a housing fund (only applicable to Chinese employees). China’s social security law was promulgated by the central government, but its administration and specific details are governed by local authorities. For instance, for each benefit, the employee and employer contributions rates and base differ as per the local jurisdiction and are subject to annual changes and reforms.
    1
  23825.  @treks6486  "Simple, collect from the buyer. Renew the road tax insurance and pay whatever fees involved in the transfer of ownership." But according to you, you can't sell your car if you don't pay the road tax, so how to collect money from the buyer (which is considered a sale) to pay the road tax? "It is just a condition that the road tax must be renewed logically because the new owner wants to drive it on the road." So even though you supposedly own the car, you have to constantly pay road tax to the government, in order to drive your car. Then how's that ownership when you constantly have to pay the government in order to properly use your vehicle? "You see if I don't drive the car on the road, I don't have to pay road tax." People who don't own cars get to walk on the road, even though they don't pay road tax for using the road. Yet car-owners have to pay road tax just to use the same roads that non-car owners use. Basically, it's a tax on cars that's what it is. "I can drive the car in my farm (just example, I don't have a farm) I can do whatever with it in my property." For your property, you have to pay land taxes to your government, just for supposedly "owning your property." And apparently, since you claim there's no penalty for not paying the land tax, then why do land owners continue to pay land tax when there's no penalty for not doing so? "And if someone stole my car, the government will still try to catch them and return my car to me even though I didn't pay the road tax. The government recognizes that this car belongs to me." If government assets are stolen, then the government will also still try and catch them either way. If your stolen car was recovered and if the government realises you didn't pay road tax, there's a possibility that they won't return you your vehicle if you have unpaid road taxes. "B the way, if I sell it to a scrap yard, I don't need to pay road tax. I just need to go to government office to cancel my ownership name. I think it's free. " Again, this is another indication that you don't truly own your vehicle if you have to ask the government for permission to cancel your ownership. Even worst if it turns out you have to pay a fee just for disowning what you supposedly own. It's an "illusion of ownership" that pervades people's minds in capitalistic countries.
    1
  23826.  @treks6486  "You have a very ideological concept of ownership. So you don't own anything? Not even the computer you are typing on? " I type this on my mobile device, and I'm under no illusion that I own my phone 100%. Because I have to pay a subscription monthly phone fee for my phone, WiFi, messages, etc, in which if I don't pay, I won't be able to properly use my phone's functions to their fullest extent. This is the capitalistic world we live in, where we don't really 100% own our possessions. "So in China the government impose limitations on everything? So citizens cannot own anything?" Almost everything has some sort of limitation imposed, I can't think of something that hasn't any limitation imposed on it in China (if anyone does, feel free to correct me). But these limitations exist in Western capitalistic countries as well, like having to pay land tax for property owners, having to pay road tax for car owners, and other such examples mentioned previously. "Or are you saying people in China 100% own their things according to your definition of ownership?" No, I'm saying the opposite is true. We don't own anything 100%, because if we do, then we really don't need to pay anything (i.e zero) tax to the government, just for possessing or using something that we own. That's the true definition of "ownership". It's important to put this into perspective when talking about ownership of material possessions, that's why I'm describing this as "an illusion of ownership" like I said earlier.
    1
  23827.  @treks6486  "Sorry to say but The Soviet Union has proven him wrong," Before 1917, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe at that time, with 80% of the population being peasants whose traditional household economies were extremely inefficient compared to agriculture in Western Europe or the United States and only about 15% of the population lived in towns, and fewer than 10% worked in industry. Russia was technologically backward and lagged far behind advanced capitalist countries like Great Britain and Germany. But after the 1917 Communist Revolution by the Bolsheviks, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe at that time, both economically as well as militarily. One of the reasons why NATO was formed was in response to Soviet Union's military might, and the Soviet Union had world's 2nd largest economy from 1960 to 1985. The Soviet Union also made numerous scientific and technological discoveries during its heyday.
    1
  23828.  @treks6486  "As long as there's human greed, communism is just not attainable. Unless the good hearted people kill all the evil greedy people." This is where humanity mindset needs to undergo an evolution of sorts, to start considering our fellow beings as our brethren. Our children need to be taught Marxism-Leninism, educated on communism and what makes it work, similar to how today, people living are educated on democracy and what makes it work. A system works because the people participating in it know their duties and their responsibilities. If there is a flaw in the system, it would be best if the system can self-correct itself. "Do you think that is possible? Even if they did achieve communism, it would last 1 generation only because their children will grow up greedy and corrupt the system." Our children may grow up greedy because the current education system is flawed by capitalism. If the education system teaches individualism and "how to make profits" at the expense of the community, then of course the children will turn out like that. However, if the education system is able to impart Marxism-Leninism teachings to students, then our children will grow up knowing what makes communism work. "1950's China has proven him wrong" After the 1949 Communist Revolution, Chairman Mao Zedong seized the lands from the rich landlords and redistributed it among the peasantry, freeing the peasants from having to pay taxes to corrupt landlords. Under Chairman Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Life expectancy at birth under Mao nearly doubled from 35-40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980. Infant mortality rate and illiteracy rates halved under Mao. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%, and they have been steadily decreasing since.
    1
  23829.  @treks6486  "Your government is probably the largest capitalist practicing government in the world right now." If that's really the case, then why there still exists state-owned companies in China? Why doesn't China have (as capitalists call it) a "free market" as often claimed as a hallmark of true capitalism? "Your citizens buying properties, homes, apartments, condominiums overseas. They seem to believe in private ownership." Again, that's because the rest of the world is capitalistic, and offers up your land and property to be sold to Chinese buyers. And we have since discussed that land owners do not own the land 100%, they have to pay land taxes to the government or face possible consequences such as possible seizure of their property or so on. "Humanity is always evolving, nothing is permanent." That's true, and this begs the question: What comes next after Capitalism? It's apparent that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the over-production of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the end goal being the depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, schools, houses, hospitals, for everyone on the planet. Yet we still have homeless people, starving people, illiteracy, people lacking access to affordable healthcare. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. Karl Marx believed that capitalism can't possibly be the end goal of humanity's development, because it capitalism doesn't care about the well-being of the majority of humanity, only in enriching a small minority that's all.
    1
  23830.  @treks6486  "You may not admit it but it is capitalism that made it possible for todays China." "Any argument that the Chinese success is somehow peculiarly the responsibility of the capitalist part as opposed to the leadership of the Communist party, or the remaining enormous state-owned and operated enterprise sector, or all that happened before 1971, isn't historical analysis. It is bald ideological junk."- Richard D Wolff youtu.be/PuKa99i94NI
    1
  23831.  @David-og7di  The gender imbalance in China is due to cultural preference of boys over girls, not because of the One Child Policy. Take India for example, they are the 2nd most populous country after China and they did not have One Child Policy. Yet India also has gender imbalance with more boys than girls, even though they didn't have any population control measures similar to China. So this implies One Child Policy wasn't the cause of the gender imbalance in China. Had the One Child Policy not existed, it's likely that China will still have gender imbalance similar to India not having One Child Policy.
    1
  23832.  @David-og7di  "does that extend to CCP telling Taiwan Tibet Uighurs WHAT THEY WANT???" Taiwan themselves says that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Xinjiang rejoined China willingly and the Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet.
    1
  23833.  @David-og7di  "神州 Shenzhou nope...the rest of us need freedom from wumao and paid youtube presenters" If you have a problem with YouTube policy allowing paid promotions then you're always welcome to criticise YouTube or use some other social media websites, what's the big deal? Just don't use YouTube if you don't like YouTube policy.
    1
  23834.  @David-og7di  "It's you who wants to come to our countries for better education less pollution less people and better lifestyles." Because China has the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion, so obviously there are going to be more people from China migrating out than people who want to migrate into an already populous country. But in recent years, China is experiencing a "reverse brain drain" where Chinese intellectuals in other countries migrate back to the homeland, bringing in new ideas and technology to our shores.
    1
  23835.  @David-og7di  "Communism has failed in every country since the Russian revolution." Before the 1917 Communist Revolution, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe at that time. But after the 1917 Communist Revolution by the Bolsheviks, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe at that time, both economically as well as militarily. The Soviet Union was world's 2nd largest from 1960-1985 and one of the reasons why NATO was form was in response to Soviet growing military might. The Soviet Union also made numerous advances in science and technology they even launched the world's first artificial satellite, Sputnik-1 into orbit.
    1
  23836.  @blimpusa  Ancient Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions?
    1
  23837.  @juvezhang1715  Indeed. Just for comparison, the Chinese savings rate of 44.9% GDP is among the highest in the world. The culture of saving money has helped many Chinese to weather Covid-19 when the money is needed.
    1
  23838. That's why in China, it's the Chinese government that controls the state-owned corporations for China's benefit, whereas in the United States, it's actually the corporations that exert the most control. Even over the US government.
    1
  23839. That's why in China, it's the Chinese government that controls the state-owned corporations for China's benefit. Whereas you have the opposite in the United States.
    1
  23840. That's why in China, it's the Chinese government that controls the state-owned corporations for China's benefit. Whereas you have the opposite in the United States, it's their corporations that exert control the most.
    1
  23841.  @Cosmo1093  China applies for more patents than any other country in the world, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators (Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Indicators#Patents ) Patent applications in 2014 1. China (928,177) 2. United States (578,802) 3. Japan (325,989) 4. South Korea (210,292) 5. European Patent Office (152,662) 6. Germany (65,965) ...
    1
  23842.  @ericcartmann  Trump's tariffs are extremely unpopular among American businesses and farmers, because contrary to what Trump says, it's not China that pays for the tariffs, its the American firms that pay for it and its going to trickle down to affect the consumers (Americans themselves) eventually. Therefore the odds are apparently against these tariffs and the continuation of this trade war.
    1
  23843.  @ericcartmann  China conducted the world's first 5G remote surgery on test animal. The doctor is located some 50 km away from the operating theater, using robotic arms to operate on a test animal and remove its liver. Video: China completes world’s first 5G remote surgery in test on animal youtube.com/watch?v=yFR61jjL1vo
    1
  23844.  @ericcartmann  China's first 5G-based remote surgery took place in Sanya, Hainan. The 3-hour surgery was performed on a patient suffering from Parkison's disease. Hainan-based doctor Ling Zhipei controls the surgical instruments 3,000 km away in Beijing through a 5G network and successfully implanted a deep brain stimulation in the patient. Video: Doctor performs China's first 5G surgery on human brain youtube.com/watch?v=qiZrWx51zp0
    1
  23845. Agreed. Even China's propaganda doesn't hold a candle to it. Many audiences are skeptical of what Chinese media says (even though they cite facts, figures and primary sources), whereas many are quick to believe whatever American media says about China (even without proof).
    1
  23846. Agreed. China's media doesn't hold a candle to the U.S, they have a hard time convincing our audiences, whereas American media does it almost effortlessly to theirs.
    1
  23847.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou Raise some good points here. What did the insulting picture actually show?" No pictures have emerged, but some descriptions indicate it was a caricature of Xi wearing a crown. Caricature depictions can vary, and some can be very insulting. Go ahead and hang an insulting picture of the late Queen Elizabeth II in the United Kingdom and see whether you get arrested. How can the arrests of anti-monarchy protests be justified just because it was during the period of mourning? So you have no evidence as to the identities of the people behind the alleged violence? Then why'd you jumped to the conclusion that communist party members were somehow behind the alleged incident (you said: "Are the CCP doing this because of the big meeting in China or can we expect the CCP to attack more protestors?")? I thought that under U.K law, a suspect is considered innocent until proven guilty, yet from your words, it appears that you've already judged that somehow the CPC is behind the alleged incident without proof.
    1
  23848. Do you judge countries on their English proficiency? In fact, Mandarin Chinese is the world's most spoken language by number of speakers and even on the Internet, Chinese language is the 2nd most common language in the Internet.
    1
  23849. @Chally wally Woo Mandarin Chinese is clearly the world's most spoken language The 10 Most Spoken Languages In The World babbel.com/en/magazine/the-10-most-spoken-languages-in-the-world/
    1
  23850. 其实～这是为了给印度一点面子的。
    1
  23851. Perhaps Russian's response to the shelling of Zaporizhzhia is to shutdown the nuclear power plant altogether.
    1
  23852. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23853. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23854. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23855. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  23856. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23857. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23858. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23859.  @Andy-P  "Makes the killing easier..." It has reached a point where a U.S military can kill 10 Afghan civilians (including women and children) in a drone strike, and the U.S General responsible for ordering the attack can get away with this without significant consequence. That's how deep into the U.S war machine that the ordinary Americans have fallen into.
    1
  23860. @Xi The Poo What makes you think Taiwan had the culture compared to the mainland? China today has many historical monuments like The Great Wall of China, The Forbidden City, Summer Palace, Temple of Heaven, Qin Emperor Tomb, Terracotta Army, The Grand Canal (world's oldest and longest artificial river) and many more historical sites. According to UNESCO World Heritage, China ranks top in the world in number of world heritage sites at 55 sites, along with Italy. Source: China has 55, ranking top in the world along with Italy wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Heritage_Sites_in_China So unless you are Italian yourself, then China has more UNESCO World Heritage sites than even your country. Wherever else you happen to hail from.
    1
  23861. @Xi The Poo Chinese food is delicious and people all over the world have proclaimed their love of Chinese food. Want something flavorful? Try our Sweet & Sour Pork. If you want something meaty, we have Peking Duck. If you want something light, we have Dim Sum Dumplings. If you're in a hurry, just grab convenient Baozi (Pork Bun) and eat it on the go. If you like mild spicy, care to try our Kung Pao Chicken? If you like very spicy, dare to try our Mapo Tofu? If you are vegetarian, we have vegetarian Springrolls. And we are tofu heaven. If you like rice, we have Fried Rice. If you like noodles, we have Chow Mein. If you like porridge, we have Congee. If you like soups, we have Hotpot. If you like seafood, well you're in luck, because Chinese love seafood too. Food is life, and no culture celebrates food as much as Chinese culture, whether it is the preparation of food or its consumption.
    1
  23862. @Xi The Poo What makes you think Taiwan and Hong Kong have more Chinese culture than the mainland? Ancient Han Chinese wore traditional Chinese clothing called Hanfu 汉服 which has 5,000 years history and influenced Japanese Kimono and Korean Hanbok clothing. Today, there's a budding Hanfu movement in the mainland, whereas Hong Kong and Taiwan aren't as interested in reviving this ancient Chinese clothing. Video: Beautiful Han Chinese Costume: Han Chinese Clothing (Hanfu) youtu.be/T6CucJxiWec?t=5 Video: Young people in China want traditional Han clothing back in fashion youtu.be/cip9DA1UvHk
    1
  23863. @Xi The Poo Hong Kong is so small and lack of agricultural farmland, so they import their food from mainland China. China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. We are home to world's largest pig, goat, sheep and duck farms. China's fishing industry accounts for one-third of the world's fish production and our fish farms account for two-thirds of the world's aquaculture production. Source: Fishing Industry in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishing_industry_in_China China ranks 1st in worldwide farm output, producing more rice, wheat, onions, cabbages, green beans, cauliflowers, eggplant, potatoes, spinaches, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potatoes, pears, grapes, peaches, apples, plums, strawberries, kiwifruits, tomatoes, watermelons, tea, beer, chestnuts, peanuts, eggs, and honey than other countries. Source: List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_producing_countries_of_agricultural_commodities Chances are that the food you ate in Hong Kong actually came from mainland China. Hong Kong land scarcity makes it difficult for it to grow their own food, so they import produce from the mainland.
    1
  23864. @Xi The Poo The Forbidden City in Beijing is world's most visited palace, surpassing even the Western palaces in number of visitors. The National Museum of China in Beijing is world's 2nd most visited museum right up there with the famous Louvre in Paris. Source: List of most visited palaces and monuments wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_visited_palaces_and_monuments#List Source: List of most visited museums wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_visited_museums#List How can Taiwan and Hong Kong culture even compare to the mainland you tell me?
    1
  23865. "In the 1898 Treaty of Paris in which Spain ceded the Philippines to the US, the object of cession was east of 118 degrees longitude (116 in the South); and the Spratly Islands fall outside (West) of that line." Source:‘China Threat Theory’ Drives Japanese War Legislation apjjf.org/-Taoka-Shunji/4380 So since the Spratly Islands fall outside of that line, then Philippines did not claim Spratly Islands as part of Philippines national boundary. Even when the Americans inherited Philippines from Spain, it was not mentioned that Spratly belonged to the Philippines.
    1
  23866. The Hague court is Permanent Court of Arbitration and its not even an official UN agency, like the International Court of Justice. Source:United Nations stresses separation from Hague Tribunal scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1989486/united-nations-stresses-separation-hague-tribunal
    1
  23867. +Mike Anderson That is from the American think tanks, and the research team in my article actually found that 70 countries supported China's stance. You mean you read the entire article and only picked out that single line that's all? What has China's investment in Africa got to do with whether those countries support China or not? You Westerners believe in democracy, and majority of countries in the world support China isn't that it? Democracy is all about who's most popular that's all, and majority of the world support China's stance as compared to Philippines stance. The United Nations clearly stated that the Hague Tribunal was separate entity from International Court of Justice. So what makes you think that UN supports the Hague Tribunal?
    1
  23868. +Jeff Spehar USA lost the Vietnam war and did not win the Korean war. If the defenders like Vietnam managed to outlast the US invaders, until the USA was forced to withdraw, then many people would consider the Vietnamese victorious.
    1
  23869.  @pinkyramos620  Why should I leave? Who are you to tell other people to leave?
    1
  23870.  @Todd-rk2lb  Which part is wrong? The Philippines had grounded a vessel in the Second Thomas Shoal. In 1999, Philippine president Joseph Estrada promised that the vessel would be towed away. In 2014, the Chinese government asked the Philippines to remove the grounded ship. In 2017, China and the Philippines established a gentlemen's agreement that the status quo be maintained for the South China Sea, as both sides tried to strengthen their relations. Under the status quo agreement, no construction materials are allowed to fortify the Sierra Madre. But the Philippines went against the agreement and sent supply ships to reinforce the rusting hull of the grounded vessel.
    1
  23871.  @niyarao2962  Chinese companies Haier and Gree Electric rank among the Top 5 Home Appliances Brands in the world. Source: The Top 5 Major Home Appliance Brands in the World 1. Haier (China) 2. Whirlpool (United States) 3. Electrolux (Sweden) 4. Gree Electric (China) 5. Bosch & Siemens (Germany) ... Source: The Top 5 Major Home Appliance Brands in the World top5ofanything.com/list/02df276c/Major-Home-Appliance-Brands-in-the-World But where are the famous companies from India as compared to China?
    1
  23872.  @josephbnd974  "神州 Shenzhou please provide a link to that poll, that the majority of Taiwanese would prefer giving up their status as a sovereign nation and reunify with CCP and become Chinese citizens?" Did I ever said that? I said: "Last I heard, the majority of the people of Taiwan (87%) want to maintain the status quo." You can find the poll on the video: Taiwan: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver at around the 18 minute 40 seconds mark.
    1
  23873.  @josephbnd974  "What language is spoken in Taiwan, Mandarin or Cantonese?" Predominantly Mandarin. Many of Taiwan's Chinese descendants came from the Fujian province on the mainland, so they also speak the dialect native to that province, (i.e Taiwanese Hokkien).
    1
  23874. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23875. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23876. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, if you read its constitution.
    1
  23877. Indeed, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23878. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, indeed.
    1
  23879.  @chrishamlin5863  Since when did I acknowledge that of both economies? According to the IMF, China's economy is expected to rebound to five percent growth in 2023.
    1
  23880.  @artemiyberzborn670  But the West believes you can change those in power through voting and elections, yet it seems it doesn't change their bleak outlook.
    1
  23881.  @gunsumwong3948  Chinese knows the debilitating effects of certain addictive substances (as evident during the Opium Wars) which is the reason why China take such a firm stance against abuse of these narcotics.
    1
  23882. The real truth is out there, but Western media seeks to twist the narrative to suit their agenda. As Mark Twain (allegedly) once said, “If you don't read the newspaper, you are uninformed. If you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed.”
    1
  23883. What makes you think all 1.4 billion people in China can't speak for ourselves?
    1
  23884.  @LouisTsuiful  You're seriously making this worst by repeating word for word what I'm saying.
    1
  23885. +S Gen Well, at least the peasantry in the West, had the support of African slave labor to do those laborious work for them.
    1
  23886. +Nazi卐 I can't speak for the rest of South East Asia (Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, etc) or for South Asia (India, Nepal, Bhutan, Pakistan, etc) but East Asians (Japanese, Koreans and Chinese) have shown to be among the most intelligent and diligent people with long history and rich cultures. People tend to stereotype Asians as smart, industrious, good at math, good at science, good with computers, having a good head for business, and so on. Stereotypical Asian jobs include doctors, lawyers, engineers, scientists, entrepreneurs, businessmen, etc. Blue collar jobs usually have an element of being hardworking, like laborers (coolies), laundromat workers, dry cleaners, chefs (of Chinese restaurants) nail salon, massage parlors, etc. I know its all just stereotype but it clearly shows that Asian people can be hardworking when needed, and also intelligent if educated from what I described above. That's why Asia is rising in those places with significant East Asian populations (China, S. Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, etc)
    1
  23887. +Nick's Picks I have not mentioned anything about communism in my previous posts so why are you accusing me of being a communist?
    1
  23888. +Claire Aura China is purchasing resources from African countries legally, whereas the Westerners had colonized Africa for slaves and resources. In exchange for raw materials, Chinese workers help build infrastructure in African countries like roads, railways, highways, bridges, hotels, hospitals, schools, shopping centers, powerstations and telecommunication projects, since the 1980s. China has done much to help develop Africa in decades compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. Under the Tibetan leaders, Tibet was brutal theocracy with 95% of the people in slavery and the remaining 5% slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil was infertile so the slaves had to work hard to feed the population. Starvation and crime were commonplace, punishments were brutal and included torture, amputation of limbs and even skinning. There is this Tibetan drum called damaru that is made from 2 human skulls, a drum skin made from human skin and a drum stick made from human bone. But under China, Tibet has rapidly modernized and Chinese workers built roads, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity. Modern technology like cars, computers, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, telephone lines were built. The Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) was built through difficult mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments to connect Tibet to the rest of the world. Food can now be imported from the mainland to feed Tibet, and a thriving tourist industry has sprung up in Lhasa. The first Tibetan universities were built thanks to China, and hydroelectric powerstations help supply Tibet with clean renewable energy. List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region
    1
  23889. @S Gen Then tell me what were the Africans doing at all, so far away from their homelands? Who brought them away from Africa in the first place? Actually, most Asians despise Japanese people, because they committed vast atrocities during WWII, such as Rape of Nanjing, Unit 731 and comfort women issue. Even the Koreans are protesting outside the Japanese embassy because their textbooks regard Korean comfort women as well paid government prostitutes.
    1
  23890. +S Gen "神州 Shenzhou There were no African slaves in the UK.." You lie! By the mid 18th century, London had the largest Black population in Britain, made up of free and enslaved people, as well as many runaways. The total number may have been about 10,000. Owners of African slaves in England would advertise slave-sales and for re-capture runaways. Within British society there were slave owners. It was regarded as fashionable amongst the upper classes to have a Black servant and they sometimes feature in paintings, such as 'The Family of Sir William Young', circa 1768 by Zoffany. There were Black people in many towns, such as Liverpool, Bristol, Bath and Lancaster. Smaller number of Black people were also found in rural areas throughout the country. Who is the one lacking knowledge of history here?
    1
  23891. +S Gen And I clearly said that "By the mid 18th century, London had the largest Black population in Britain, made up of free and enslaved people, as well as many runaways." And when did I ever said that the descendants of the white British workers were in worse conditions than the Africans? Where are you drawing your conclusions about me from?
    1
  23892. Yes indeed. It's no secret today that the U.S is in decline and China is rising. There is only a limited window of opportunity for the U.S to start a hot conflict with China, otherwise as long as peace prevails, the U.S will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise. Time is on China's side, and China should do it's best not to get suckered into a pointless conflict with the U.S over Taiwan.
    1
  23893. It's no secret today that the U.S is in decline and China is rising. There is only a limited window of opportunity for the U.S to start a hot conflict with China, otherwise as long as peace prevails, the U.S will eventually decline to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise. Time is on China's side, and China should do it's best not to get suckered into a pointless conflict with the U.S over Taiwan.
    1
  23894.  @老牛吃嫩草-r9y  America is perpetually in need of immigrants, that's why they have loose immigration criteria. As long as a foreigner has family member or relatives with U.S citizenship, they are themselves eligible to apply for U.S citizenship. That's why many foreigners marry Americans to attain U.S citizenship, and then they immigrate their whole families over (much to the disgruntlement of local Americans) China already has the world's largest population at 1.4 billion people, so China has no real need for immigrants. That's why China has strict immigration criteria, prioritizing citizenship status to overseas Chinese or foreigners who have something to offer to China, such as doctors, lawyers, dentists, engineers, scientists, researchers, etc.
    1
  23895.  leotube39  Mandarin Chinese is the world's most spoken language (by number of speakers) and even in the Internet, Chinese is the world's 2nd most common language in the Internet. Source: Top 10 Internet Languages https://internetworldstats.com/stats7.htm
    1
  23896.  @Jordan18561  Through reunification with the mainland, Taiwan would at least gain recognition in international organizations like UN, WHO (of which Taiwan is currently not recognized) and receive aid from those organizations. President Xi Jinping had previously offered to extend the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy to include Taiwan, which means Taiwan is allowed to keep their government and the mainland to keep ours, all while Taiwan is considered fully reunified with the mainland. As for its army, the Taiwan military might combine with the People's Liberation Army as a subdivision. Or perhaps the Taiwan Army and PLA can work together in combined military exercises.
    1
  23897.  @Jordan18561  The Kuomintang (KMT) Party in Taiwan is pushing for eventual reunification with mainland China.
    1
  23898.  @宋庆-i4m  While it's true that Taiwan is part of China (under the One China Policy), that does not mean they are reunified with China. Just like how Hong Kong was returned back to China in 1997, but isn't fully reunified with China, since the Sino-British Declaration meant that Hong Kong has to have their own separate system, separate government, currency, passport, etc. While both PRC 🇨🇳 and ROC 🇹🇼 observe the One China policy (that Taiwan is part of China) there still remains the issue of eventual reunification of China (i.e zhōngguó tǒngyī "中国统一")
    1
  23899.  @Jordan18561  "神州 Shenzhou Are there any prominent voices in Taiwan that are pushing for this?" Former TV host, Dr. Huang Chih-Hsien is one such prominent voice, but she had her Taiwan citizenship revoked after she called for "Taiwan to be returned to China". That's Taiwan censorship for you.
    1
  23900.  @Jordan18561  "神州 Shenzhou Are there any prominent voices in Taiwan that are pushing for this?" Former TV host, Dr. Huang Chih-Hsien is one such prominent voice, but she had her Taiwan citizenship revoked after she called for "Taiwan to be returned to China".
    1
  23901.  @chouchen1350  "神州 Shenzhou Dream on, or Wake up!" That's precisely the kind of message I would tell to the people of Taiwan who still dream of independence.
    1
  23902.  @Jordan18561  Regarding Russia and China, are you wishing for the collapse of both? Are you somehow wishing that our countries will just disappear from the face of the Earth?
    1
  23903.  @Jordan18561  She (Dr. Huang Chih-Hsien) appeared on CGTN precisely because her voice was censored in Taiwan, because her view is pro-reunification.
    1
  23904.  @Jordan18561  She (Dr. Huang Chih-Hsien) appeared on CGTN precisely because her voice was blocked in Taiwan, because her view is pro-reunification.
    1
  23905.  @everythingandmore5537  You said that in a liberal democracy the coronavirus could have been contained earlier, then why are liberal democracies like USA, UK, Italy, and India unable to contain the coronavirus earlier? These countries have among the highest number of Covid-19 cases and deaths in the world, compared to China. The facts don't match what you are claiming.
    1
  23906.  @everythingandmore5537  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  23907.  @everythingandmore5537  The Americans did not defeat the Japanese. Imperial Japan refused to surrender even after 2 atomic bombings, and USA did not even invade the Japanese mainland. It was the Soviet invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria that was the last campaign fought of WWII that finally caused Japan to surrender. Source: Soviet invasion of Manchuria wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Manchuria So if anything, we should be thanking the Communist Party of Soviet Union for putting an end to WWII.
    1
  23908.  @everythingandmore5537  The UN seat for China was decided in 1971 through voting democratically by UN countries. The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the UN General Assembly Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The poll results were as follows: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting Source: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_2758 Since PRC won the vote with two-thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, recognized the People's Republic of China (PRC) as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed the collective representatives of Chiang Kai-shek from the United Nations. …… In other words, the UN countries democratically voted to recognise mainland China's seat, and to kick Taiwan out of the UN. That's what the UN voted for.
    1
  23909.  @everythingandmore5537  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a map of all the territory Taiwan claims: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  23910.  @尊重蔡霞  You said that compared to Taiwan, mainland youth lacks innovation and creativity because of CPC, but look at smartphones, and mainland China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How is Taiwan more innovative and creative than the mainland? If CPC really stifle innovation then why are so many mainland companies successful?
    1
  23911.  @尊重蔡霞  About President Xi Jinping removing the restriction on the limit of presidency, China has hatched many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership. Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of USA's short term leadership.
    1
  23912.  @everythingandmore5537  Taiwan is experiencing a 2nd wave, Japan is insisting on continuing the Olympics despite rising Covid-19 cases, how have they done better than mainland China? And you said liberal democracies then why isn't India (world's largest democracy) able to get itself together during this 2nd wave?
    1
  23913.  @everythingandmore5537  China has many historical monuments like The Great Wall of China, Forbidden City, Qin Emperor Tomb, Terracotta Army, The Grand Canal (world's oldest and longest artificial river) and many more historical sites. Here's some videos of Chinese historical monuments. Video: The Great Wall of China in 4k - DJI Phantom 4 youtu.be/EotbKqZmBuY?t=20 Video: Forbidden City, Beijing, China in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/R9vcSWb6mug Video: Terracotta Army, Xian, China in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/VhIouznYlvo So what makes you think Chinese civilisation is destroyed? Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  23914.  @everythingandmore5537  I already shown that the last campaign fought of WWII was the Soviet invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria that finally caused Imperial Japan to surrender and ended WWII. The USA bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, mostly killing Japanese civilians like women, children, the elderly, and men unfit for active military duty. The vast majority of Japanese military strength remained unaffected by the atomic bombings of its cities, that's why Imperial Japan refused to surrender even after 2 atomic bombings by the USA, so how did USA defeat Japan?
    1
  23915.  @everythingandmore5537  Could you please explain why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the Communist's right to rule the mainland. The people of China have made their decision after all.
    1
  23916.  @everythingandmore5537  What mainland statistics? I already shown that China's UN seat was determined democratically by voting through UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 and the poll results were as follows: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting Source: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_2758 Since PRC clearly won the election with two-thirds majority vote, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, and recognised PRC as China and kicked ROC out of the UN seat. This was all achieved through democratic voting by UN countries.
    1
  23917.  @everythingandmore5537  Explain how was Mao's China UN seat blocked by US veto? China won the vote with two-thirds majority, the poll results were -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting And USA did not use it's veto, that's why as of 1971, China gained our seat at the UN and Taiwan was kicked out of it's UN seat. Because the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan, then how is ROC the rightful leader of mainland China? You can't even refute my points so you just make up your own alternative history that's all.
    1
  23918.  @everythingandmore5537  Why do you want China to collapse? China's collapse would plunge our country into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China? You have shown that you're clearly anti-China, you care nothing for China's interests, nor do you actually want to see China succeed that's all.
    1
  23919.  @尊重蔡霞  About President Xi Jinping being leader for life, look at German Chancellor Angela Merkel and for how long has she been in power? Other Western leaders have long reached the end of their term limits and stepped down, yet Merkel still remains in power. In fact, Merkel has been Chancellor of Germany for longer than Xi Jinping been President of China currently, yet nobody in the West complains about Merkel? Because Merkel has been a good leader for Germany, that's why she remains in power. She gains more wisdom and political experience the longer she's in power and she is able to make good political decisions for Germany. Given that Germany has no term limits, Merkel could possibly be Chancellor of Germany for life and nobody cares about it, they might even welcome it. So why are you against President Xi Jinping being president for life? China has many long-term plans, then why can't China abolish the term limits so that our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future?
    1
  23920.  @尊重蔡霞  Besides smartphones, Chinese companies also dominate the civilian drone industry and Chinese company DJI is world's largest civilian drone-maker according to the following source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 top10drone.com/top-drone-companies/ But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to mainland China? Yet you claim the Communist Party is stifling innovation in China? How?
    1
  23921.  @尊重蔡霞  If you you disagree with my opinion, why not attempt to refute my points? In fact Huawei has overtaken Apple as the world's No. 2 smartphone seller. Source: Huawei overtakes Apple as world No. 2 smartphone seller, gains ground in China reuters.com/article/us-huawei-revenue-idUSKBN1KL0BN
    1
  23922.  @尊重蔡霞  "神州 Shenzhou Does Angela Merkel's long being in power imply that other democracy should abandon the restriction on presidency? No!" Nobody is saying that other democracies abandon the restriction on presidential term limits, but does that mean that China should abandon our restriction on presidential term limits? No! Since Germany has Angela Merkel, then why can't China have long term leader like President Xi Jinping? The decision to abolish presidential term limits was the decision of the Communist Party of China, and they voted to abolish presidential term limits. Since people have complained about German Chancellor Merkel and you also said that "in fact, even lots of communist party disagree on what Xi did" then what makes you think there is no dissent in China? Your logic applied to German Chancellor Merkel, then it also applies to President Xi in this case isn't it? What's the problem then? Also, a long term Harvard University study has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens actually support the Communist Party of China. Source: Harvard survey finds Chinese satisfaction with govt rises china.org.cn/china/2020-07/17/content_76281590.htm A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study.
    1
  23923.  @尊重蔡霞  What makes you think Huawei isn't creative? Huawei holds 56,492 active patents on telecommunications, networking and other high-tech inventions worldwide, according to Anaqua, an intellectual property-management software firm. Source: Huawei Has 56,492 Patents and It's Not Afraid to Use Them bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-14/huawei-has-56-492-patents-and-it-s-not-afraid-to-use-them
    1
  23924.  @尊重蔡霞  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA in all 3 subjects: reading, science and mathematics. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    1
  23925. Most Chinese don't care about politics. However for those that actually do, they'll need to join the communist party (must be top student or top 5% of their industry), sit through various tests, be put on probation for a year, before they graduate as fully fledged communist members. From then on they'll have implement policies, garner votes from the other communist members, be graded on performance and slowly rise through the ranks of the communist party. It certainly isn't easy, but it ensures that only the most competent people get to make political decisions for the country and that they have earned their right to do so.
    1
  23926. Probably because there are members in AfCFTA that recognize Taiwan (Republic of china) over the People's Republic of China. Eswatini is one such African nation that recognizes Taiwan over mainland China, and is also a signatory to AfCFTA.
    1
  23927.  @talisikid1618  "神州 Shenzhou why? It’s a trap to enslave you." How? The real trap is credit cards, they were invented so that workers who used up their paychecks can continue purchasing on credit, so that the money will be deducted from their next paycheck, essentially encouraging workers to spend more than what they are paid.
    1
  23928.  @Smiler2724  Let's get this straight. China's digital Renminbi is a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) issued by the central bank and they have control over it. It's fundamentally different from cryptocurrency (which is imploding right now) like Bitcoin, Etherium, etc, which is backed by nothing, and I would agree that crypto's time appears to be over. But the era of CBDC is only just beginning.
    1
  23929. Chinese government has proposed 5-year plan, 10-year plan, 20-year plan for China, in 2020, 2030, etc. If a strong and capable leader is necessary in order to make long-term plans such as Belt and Road Initiative, a success, then why can't China keep such a leader for longer period? China should follow our own path to success, not just blindly copy Western government system.
    1
  23930. United States is not even a member of the ICC, or the International Court of Justice for that matter. The US withdrew from compulsory ICJ jurisdiction in 1986 and will only accept the court's jurisdiction on a case-by-case basis. Yet they claim to be all about "following the rules-based order".
    1
  23931. Dan If you watch Chinese media like CGTN or New China TV, the topics are usually about how to promote better economic cooperation between the West and about how Chinese government and Western government can coexist peacefully. But Western media like Fox News, CNN, BBC all tend to paint negative view of China, of possible war scenario with China and starting trade wars with China.
    1
  23932.  @bartonlee3594  "Shenzhou. Hong Kong is not the international draw of capital that it once was." After its return to China in 1997, Hong Kong's GDP made up 18.4% of China's GDP. Fast forward to 2021 and Hong Kong's GDP only makes up 2.1% of China's GDP. Hong Kong used to enjoy a special privilege as the gateway to mainland Chinese markets, but with China's opening up, Hong Kong needs to innovate new ways but has been unable to do so.
    1
  23933.  @edmundleung2098  Indeed. That's why China prioritize public order and social stability above all else. Only when public order is restored, then can economic growth continue.
    1
  23934.  @MarkYeung1  Western journalists have been predicting China "hard landing" since 1990. Here's a compiled list of what they have to say about China's economy: 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell Recession. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  23935.  @MarkYeung1  "China's economy is facing a lot of headwind" 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell Recession. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  23936. Morph Verse President Trump is unilaterally slapping sanctions on steel and aluminium, without even going through the proper WTO channels here. Even other countries like Australia, India and Japan, are also protesting the move.
    1
  23937. It may be stereotypical of course, but Chinese are perhaps among the most intelligent and diligent peoples, with long histories and rich culture. Chinese can perform all manner of work, from farmers, laborers (coolies), rickshaw drivers, to chefs (of Chinese restaurants) laudromat workers, nail salon workers, to doctors, lawyers, businessmen, scientists, etc. It almost seems like no job is too low or too high for Chinese. Of course, its just stereotypes that aren't necessarily true, but there probably have been many of such occurrences to create these stereotypes in the first place.
    1
  23938.  @ronrice1931  They are generalizations and stereotypes of Chinese yes, but it is naive to think that all humans are somehow created equal. People are different and it's disingenuous to pretend that such differences don't exist.
    1
  23939.  @ronrice1931  Are you seriously saying that there's no differences between races? Then why do races exist at all, if there aren't any differences?
    1
  23940. Taiwan's MOFA also rejected the 2016 ruling. In fact, Taiwan claims a larger swathe of the South China Sea (through it's 11 Dash Line map) compared to mainland China's 9 Dash Line map. Have you been reading any books at all yourself?
    1
  23941.  GTA and Apple channel  then what?
    1
  23942. At 4:30 , why do you think China was better pre Communist Party? China was dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past under the Republic Of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) where China was divided into various warring provinces controlled by individual warlords and even Japan invaded China during this weak period of Chinese history. It was Mao Zedong and the Communists who succeeded in herculean task of reunifying our divided country and founded the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949.
    1
  23943. Chinese workers make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, clothing, toys, sneakers, etc, cheap and affordable, so that the cost of living in America is lower than it should be. Think of the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on things like cars, houses, luxury brands, or essentials like school fees, tuition fees, hospital bills, doctors fees, rent, etc.
    1
  23944. AlexTzaferis China is the 1st country in the world to successfully mount an electromagnetic railgun onto a mobile platform, such as a navy vessel, and to have successfully test-fired the railgun out at sea. Even the USA has not managed to get its railgun out of its land testing facility and on to a mobile platform.
    1
  23945. Countries like Japan and Germany were enemies of UN security council but they prospered despite not being members of UNSC.
    1
  23946. Alex Tzaferis Westerners also copied Chinese military technology like the crossbow, rockets and gunpowder isn't it? As for the railgun, it has been fired out at sea and the head researcher behind it has been awarded for her contribution. Source:China’s railgun confirmed: Military ‘award’ reveals electromagnetic supergun tested at sea news.com.au/technology/innovation/chinas-supergun-nears-readiness/news-story/f3554a1cc140413ae16af7078f0e5cca
    1
  23947. There were actually only hundreds of thousands of protestors, not over a million Hong Kong protestors. Most of the people of Hong Kong carried on as per normal.
    1
  23948.  @biggpicture2930  "China got to work hard to make "money" .India and Russia, Africa etc got to work hard too BUT Spoof!, USA got money out of the AIR!" That's the magical power of the U.S Dollar printing machine. Make money out of thin air! Other countries have to work for our money, but not the USA.
    1
  23949. +Koninkrijk der Nederlanden said "But happiness and individual freedom are having value as well, a value communists just don't seem to grasp." Are Americans themselves happy with their democracy? That they voted for Trump for President? Why so many Americans took to the streets to protest the Trump winning the US elections, even when he was democratically voted in? As for freedom, Chinese people are free to travel to other countries for vacation or work or studies. Everybody has seen Chinese Tourists in their countries, spending money on branded goods and so on. In your schools and universities, there are many Chinese international exchange students, studying overseas in your countries. In your research laboratories, there are many Chinese scientists and researchers working in collaboration with foreign companies. Even in the workplace, you are bound to encounter Chinese colleagues.
    1
  23950.  @bernardlowe5433  Falun Gong organ harvesting rumors have long been debunked by international health experts to China. Dr. Campbell Fraser, a scholar from Australia's Griffith University who was also present at the Geneva conference in 2017, said, "I would like to clearly state that China does not use organs from Falun Gong practitioners, I'm absolutely convinced of that.": Philip O'Connell, director of the Centre for Transplant and Renal Research at the Westmead Institute for Medial Research in Australia, said "One reason why some people believed them (rumors) in the first place was because of the lack of knowledge". Francis Delmonico, another leading expert who attended the news conference, said he agreed with O'Connell that the rumors have been effectively countered by the transparent and complete data Chinese authorities provided. Jose Ramon Nunez, an adviser at the WHO, said "We have this (figure)－135, 000 organ transplantations performed every year in the world－which is only 10 percent of the real needs."
    1
  23951.  @yukikazeization  你有证据火车上采访的人是维族吗？翻墙之后就学得西方媒体对中国很傲慢与偏见，为什么还信西方媒体呢？
    1
  23952.  @bernardlowe5433  Falun Dafa was founded in 1992 by Li Hongzhi, by hijacking existing practices from well-established religions like Taoism, Buddhism and traditional Qigong practices. This should already sound off alarm bells that Falun Dafa is actually a cult in disguise, since this "religion" is only a mere 27 years old. What makes you think it is a some legit religion? Falun Dafa followers believe their leader Li is the chosen savior of man and has supernatural powers to cure all ailments. Falun Dafa followers, believe that Li Hongzhi is always right and they are not allowed to question the basic assumptions concerning his purported supernatural powers, teachings and/or opinions. There are cases where some Falun Dafa followers have early stage cancer, yet they refused to seek medical treatment, instead they are encouraged to donate their savings to Li in hopes that he could cure them. The cancer patients died in the end.
    1
  23953.  @bernardlowe5433  Under old Chinese laws, yes it was legal to harvest organs from prisoners on death row, but only with the prior consent of the criminal or permission of relatives. In my opinion, the prisoner is already sentenced to death, so at least the organs will be put to good use, instead of being wasted and rotting away with the body. But since 2014, China has abolished the practice of harvesting organs from executed prisoners, and organ transplant rates in China are low, and transplant waiting lists are long, as shown in The Economist magazine. The Economist: China ends the practice of harvesting organs from executed prisoners economist.com/graphic-detail/2014/12/30/organ-harvest
    1
  23954.  @bernardlowe5433  It's a myth that protestors actually died in Tiananmen Square, Jun 1989, and various eyewitness there said nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053
    1
  23955.  @bernardlowe5433  The United States has the world's largest prison incarceration rate, and its prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity, that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets in order to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate Having such a huge prison population represents a significant drain on the country's resources for upkeep of its prions. Even worst is that most former convicts in USA are unable to find employment and reintegrate back to society, many return to a life of crime and wound up back behind bars. At least in China, we are providing a proper Chinese education to the Uighurs and training them in job skills to help prepare them for the workforce, so that they can become productive members of society.
    1
  23956.  @bernardlowe5433  Hong Kong extradition bill was proposed because of a certain incident. Some Honger named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan, then proceeded to strangle her to death, and then flew back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body in Taiwan. Chan has since confessed, and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice in Taiwan, but Hong Kong realized it has no existing extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victims families. That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to Hong Kong Extradition Bill, to cover up this legal loophole that exists. Do the Hong Kong protestors even understand what they are protesting about? Have they even read the bill themselves and understood its contents?
    1
  23957.  @masterace1150  Well, why don't you see what they do to non-believers in Islamic countries? Stone people to death for being gay? Women in Saudi Arabia can't even drive and have to be escorted in public at all times by male relative or family member. So why can't China remove the extremism from Uighurs, and impart to them positive Chinese virtues, like being studious and industrious?
    1
  23958.  @bernardlowe5433  This legal loophole has already been exposed, and if Hong Kong doesn't pass this extradition treaty, then Hong Kong might become a safe haven for criminals who commit crimes in other countries and escape to Hong Kong where there is no extradition treaty. So why can't this extradition treaty expand to include mainland China? What if instead of Taiwan, the next murder commits a crime in mainland China and then flees to Hong Kong?
    1
  23959. ​ @bernardlowe5433  According to Jay Mathews, reporter for The Washington Post, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square and all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. Source: The Myth of Tiananmen archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php I give evidence to support my points, yet you just ignore them and claim that I am factually wrong?
    1
  23960.  @bernardlowe5433  The USA separates parents from kids by deporting illegal immigrant parents, and then sending their kids to detention centres. Source: bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-07-03/trump-s-border-patrol-obscenities-will-shame-america-for-decades Adults were crammed into cells with only room to stand and that children weren’t given hot meals or showers. Migrants forced to clean themselves with wet wipes or subsist on bologna sandwiches had developed constipation and other medical problems. Running water wasn’t available and detained immigrants should drink from toilets, and they weren’t allowed to bathe or brush their teeth. “They don’t have the humanitarian conditions for people to be there,” one migrant told the newspaper. “There were more than 200 of us in a single cage — seated on the floor, standing, however we could fit.” The same person said that “the stench inside overflowing toilets was so bad it made him gag and caused children to vomit.” The Clint facility wasn’t providing migrants with toothbrushes, toothpaste or soap. “Children as young as 7 and 8, many of them wearing clothes caked with snot and tears, are caring for infants they’ve just met,” the Times wrote of the Clint camp. “Toddlers without diapers are relieving themselves in their pants. Teenage mothers are wearing clothes stained with breast milk.” Seriously, these Uighurs in Chinese schools have much better life than the illegal immigrants in US detention centers, having rooms with beds to sleep in, classrooms to receive a proper education, and even playtime in their spacious courtyards in their highly security kindergartens. Also, it was revealed that during the weekends, both adults and children are allowed to leave and return to their home villages, before resuming classes the next week,
    1
  23961.    I have provided sources claiming that Tiananmen Square massacre was a British myth and that actual eyewitnesses in Tiananment Square said nobody died that night and that while a military unit did enter the Square, the protestors were allowed to leave peacefully in the end. And the guy who masked his voice, how do you know for sure that that person is a Uighur? Because the voice is distorted, they could have made up a false interview in order to paint China in a negative light, so why do you still believe them?
    1
  23962.  @YNHOSebs  What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study and play. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 China now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese people can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up a fifth of the world's population. Go to your neighborhood and how many Chinese nationals can you see? Or go to your local university and ask the local students how they feel about the "Chinese competition"
    1
  23963.  @kory6897  So why did VICE News show the full faces of the two men from Kashgar and did not distort their voices then? Why didn't they distort the voice of the kindergartener girl? Instead they only did so for that mysterious voice on board the train and claim it to be from an Uighur?
    1
  23964.  @kory6897  China restricts journalists access because China's good thing will be twisted by the Western anti-Communist propaganda and portrayed in a negative light, as shown in VICE News.
    1
  23965.  @kory6897  Wikipedia is not banned in China and nobody will come arrest you for accessing Wikipedia while in China.
    1
  23966.  @bernardlowe5433  You want to talk about crime statistics between Hong Kong and the mainland? Former Chinese vice-minister of public security Chen Zhimin said that more than 300 ‘important fugitives’ had fled to Hong Kong. And its not just mainland China that is affect, even Macau does not have extradition laws with Hong Kong, so people like fugitive property tycoon Joseph Lau (wanted in Macau for crimes of bribery) can escape punishment by fleeing to Hong Kong. Sources: More than 300 ‘important fugitives’ had fled to Hong Kong scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/3001585/security-chief-john-lee-defends-hong-kongs-fugitive Fugitive property tycoon Joseph Lau to challenge Hong Kong's extradition plans straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/fugitive-tycoon-to-challenge-hong-kongs-extradition-plans So what do you even know about crime statistics between Hong Kong, Macau and mainland China? That horrible murder of a pregnant woman by her HK boyfriend, could have easily happened in Macau or mainland China, and because of HK's lack of extradition laws, these criminals can evade capture and extradition, so why should HK government permit this you tell me?
    1
  23967.  @bernardlowe5433  Back when Hong Kong was still a British colony, it was a thriving, flourishing port city while mainland China was still dirt-poor at that time. But times have changed and Hong Kong has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan and is facing increasing competition from upcoming mainland cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian, etc. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage No wonder why the people of Hong Kong fear being left behind, and mainland Chinese port cities have surpassed its value and rivaling its business and financial status.
    1
  23968.  @wesscat  China's political system has shown to be viable for our country and extremely successful to boot, so is there a need to adopt Western democracy? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  23969.  @toddfarkman2177  Bruce Lee's Kung Fu movies changed Americans perception of Asian men, but Hollywood continues to under-portray Asian actors, or typically stereotyped roles that damaged Americans perception of Asians, especially Asian women as hookers. That's why the Atlanta shooting of 8 people (6 of whom were Asian women) happened.
    1
  23970.  @toddfarkman2177  Andrew Yang's policy of giving poor households money has been copied by the Biden administration without credit to Yang. And there are ethnic minorities in the Communist Party of China.
    1
  23971.  @toddfarkman2177  The Chairman of Xinjiang Uyghur Automous Region is Shohrat Zakir (Uighur: شۆھرەت زاكىر;) of Uyghur origin. Since October 2017, he is the member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. Before him there was Nur Bekri (Uighur: نۇر بەكرى; ) of Uighur descent. Between 2014 and 2018, he was Vice-Chairman of the National Development and Reform Commission and Director of the National Energy Administration, with rank equivalent of a minister. Bekri was one of the highest ranked ethnic minority officials in the Chinese government. There's Ismail Amat (Uighur: ئىسمائىل ئەھمەد) an Uyghur politician of China who served as Chairman (Governor) of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, State Councillor, Vice-Chairman of the National People's Congress and Vice-Chairman of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), but he passed away on 16 October 2018 in Beijing, at the age of 83. But the only known Chinese descent politician in America is Andrew Yang? No other prominent Chinese American candidates?
    1
  23972.  @toddfarkman2177  Regarding Asian stereotypes about being smart, tech-savvy, hard workers, this doesn't guarantee there is no racism against Asians, just because of positive Asian stereotypes. For example, you said Asians being smart and the best in universities can create negative resentment among Americans who believe that they are losing grades to Asians and job offers when they graduate. This positive stereotype could result in racism against Asians Just like the stereotype you said Asians are tech-savvy might create images of Asians as hackers and imagined as culprits behind cyber attacks (especially in the USA, Australia) which in turn, breeds resentment among Asians. Even the Asian stereotype of being hard-working can breed resentment, because it gives the sense that Asians are somehow stealing American jobs. This goes to show that what you regard as "positive stereotypes" about Asians, can backfire and lead to racist attacks against Asian, because of such perceptions. It doesn't necessarily mean that with positive stereotypes that there will be no racism against Asians.
    1
  23973. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23974. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23975. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23976. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  23977.  @matthewmorgan7106  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    1
  23978.  Peder Hansen  Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China youtu.be/TtduKDpy4oc China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  23979.  @mrroy5542  It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set, and many economists believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United States, some time in the foreseeable future. If China can someday surpass the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this eventual goal of ours? Nobody said USA should be on top all the time.
    1
  23980.  @mrroy5542  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, and our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE
    1
  23981.  @kevinj12345  "神州 Shenzhou but you're using that as the reason they should be forcibly subjected to the CCP." When did I ever said that? China could always extend the One Country, Two Systems policy to include Taiwan, allowing the island to keep their own separate government, separate Taiwan passport, separate currency and even keep their own Army, yet still be considered fully reunified with mainland China.
    1
  23982.  @kevinj12345  About your hyperbole, the fact remains that according to Wikipedia: Prehistory of Taiwan, the current native Taiwanese aborigines were descended from farmers that left mainland China some 5,000 years ago, around the same time as China's 5,000 years of history began. Secondly, the Qing Dynasty Government abolished the "Han only" version of China and redefined China as a multi-ethnic state. So whether the people of Taiwan are Han or not, the island is still part of China.
    1
  23983.  @kevinj12345  "神州 Shenzhou you can't violate something you never agreed to follow." According to the website of U.S Department of State regarding U.S Relations with Taiwan, the U.S does not have diplomatic relations with Taiwan and the U.S has a longstanding One China policy guided by the three U.S.-China Joint Communiques (one of which is the 1972 Shanghai Communique). Also, according to the website, the U.S does not support Taiwan independence.
    1
  23984.  @kevinj12345  You said: "China has also violated the agreement by making threats of violence toward Taiwan before the US ever visited." Could you point out which period did mainland China violated the agreement by making threats of violence toward Taiwan? Cross-strait relations were peaceful right until the US House of Representative speaker visited Taiwan.
    1
  23985.  @item6931  "That plus thinking posting more makes him right are the characteristics of @神州 Shenzhou" I put plenty of thought into my posts, whereas you just label my statements are FALSE when I've never even made them in the first place! Like when did I ever said that the native Taiwanese are descended from Han?
    1
  23986.  @bartonlee3594  Beijing has already distanced itself from statements made by its ambassador to France. Also regarding Lu's answer regarding Crimea, what he said was factually accurate. Crimea was Russian territory that was given to Ukraine by Nikita Khrushchev (which is a historical fact). Additionally, the 2014 Crimea Referendum result was that an overwhelming majority (97%) voted to join the Russian Federation.
    1
  23987.  @kevinj12345  Who said that YouTube is blocked for almost all of the Chinese people? Haven't you heard of Chinese vlogger Liziqi? Her YouTube channel has garnered more than 2.7 billion views and 16 million subscribers (as verified on 21 August 2021) which is a Guinness World Record for "The most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube".
    1
  23988.  @kevinj12345  Since when did your previous post refuted anything? Like you've accused mainland China of violating the agreement by making threats of violence toward Taiwan before the US even visited, then could you quote an example of it?
    1
  23989.  @bartonlee3594  "Thirteen members of the United Nations Security Council voted in favor of a resolution declaring the referendum invalid, including China." China abstained in that vote.
    1
  23990.  @kevinj12345  You said: "Also, was not my disrespectful post specifically about the hyperbole "rebuttal" you dished out?" I've made my stance clear. The current Taiwanese native arborigines were descended from farmers from mainland China who arrived on the island some 5,000 years ago (which coincidentally is the beginning of China's 5,000 years of history). Even if you claim they aren't Han, well, Qing Dynasty was a multi-ethnic state, and redefined China as "more than just Han" so regardless of the Taiwanese native arborigines being Han or not, Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  23991.  @item6931  "This is exactly what Shenzhou does. The New Mongol Usurpers (sometimes called the CCP) pay him more if he does this I guess lol" Why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lost the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the KMT had massive wealth, superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and fled to Taiwan? Then how is Taiwan the real China?
    1
  23992.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Xi's (and your) tacit support for Russia in this war will not win any friends in Europe." China has publicly stated many times that we support peace, and China even put forth a 12-point peace plan for Ukraine. Also, according to the EU, Europe is not a party to this conflict and Europe is not at war with Russia. So what business is it of Europe that China work towards peace in Ukraine? You said: "But authoritarian states have to stick together." You could also say the same of Western democracies, so what's your point then?
    1
  23993.  @item6931  The Phillipines coastguard patrol boat Maritime Control Surveillance 3001 fatally shot a 65-year old Chinese fisherman Hong Shicheng (洪石成), then can't China step up efforts to protect Chinese shipping? And which Filipino fishermen has been shot by Chinese coastguard? Answer: None!
    1
  23994.  @item6931  Since when did China impose sanctions on Australia? China has been buying Australian beef, wine, and other imports, whereas do you know which country is considered the most protectionist? Answer: the United States of America. According to Global Trade Alert, the US has taken over 800 protectionist policies, more than any other in the world. The EU has over 300 protectionist policies, while China is at the range between 200-300 in comparison.
    1
  23995.  @item6931  Spavor and Korvig were taken into custody on charges of espionage, but what crime did Meng Wanzhou commit while in Canada? Eventually, the Canadians were released as a gesture of goodwill after Meng was released.
    1
  23996.  @item6931  What's the name of that court that did the ruling with UNCLOS? Is it a recognized UN agency? If not, then China reserves the right not to adhere to such a ruling. And you're just going to ignore what the Philippine coastguard did to that 65-year old Chinese fisherman?
    1
  23997.  @item6931  So India also did not vote to condemn Russia, which means you're claiming India does not support peace? Also, supporting peace means that you listen to both sides of the argument, and the fact that President Xi Jinping has put forth a peace plan, talked to Russian President Putin and Ukrainian counterpart Zelenskyy indicates that China is committed to a peaceful resolution to the Ukraine conflict.
    1
  23998.  @item6931  So you're agreeing that NATO expanded eastwards into the Warsaw Pact and Soviet countries, right up to Russia's doorstep, then how is it unprovoked. And Ukraine was actually growing closer to Russia, until the 2014 coup d'etat directed by the US, ousted Ukrainian President Yanukovych and installed their own favored candidate in place.
    1
  23999.  @item6931  You said: "Canada held her to extradite her to face charges in the US: it was the US that wanted to put her on trial." Pray tell, what exactly are these charges that Meng Wanzhou is accused of? At least with Spavor and Korvig, the charges were one of espionage, but you can't even answer my question of what crime did Meng allegedly commit. You said: "Canada was just complying with its extradition obligations to the US." One of the requirements for Canada's extradition obligation is that Canada must be notified of the exact crime and evidence must be presented, in order to extradition to take place. But Canada doesn't even know what crimes Meng was accused of committing, they just detain her without a crime that's all.
    1
  24000.  @item6931  Good News: President Xi has announced that he will send a delegation to Ukraine to hold talks with all parties on resolving the conflict there, after the phone call with Zelenskyy. This is good news for people wanting to see a peaceful resolution to the conflict. Much better than those countries that continue to pour military equipment into Ukraine and prolonging the conflict.
    1
  24001.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou My friend, I think the tacit support for Russia is a mistake." How are we ever to arrive at a peaceful outcome, if we only concentrate on listening to one side, while ignoring the other side's point of view? I mean, when an argument breaks out between your friends, do you just listen to a one-sided story? Or hear out both sides? In fact, China is actually doing the West a favor by offering to hold talks for a peaceful resolution to the conflict in Ukraine. That can only be achieved by listening to the accounts of all involved parties.
    1
  24002.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Answer this question: Who has a higher GDP: Russia or Spain? Tacit support for a tiny little Putin state will not bear dividends--for anyone, now or in future." Politics is not just about economics alone. A country's GDP should not be the only reason for expressing support (overt or covert) for it. Compared to Spain, Russia is China's direct neighbor, both now as well as in the future, so what good would it be for China to abandon our carefully cultivated relation with Russia for Spain? I mean, if we use your argument, then Ukraine's GDP is smaller than Russia's, yet why is the West throwing almost everything they have into Ukraine?
    1
  24003.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou My friend, so why do Wolf Warriors accept Russia's annexation of Crimea and Donbas?" Lu Shaye had already explained his reasoning through his answer to the interview's question. The question was "Does Crimea belong to Ukraine?" and his response was that it depends. Crimea was historically part of Russia and it was given to Ukraine by Nikita Khrushchev during the Soviet Union. And the 2014 Crimea Referendum revealed that a overwhelming majority (97%) voted to join the Russian Federation.
    1
  24004.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "I think we should let the Europeans/NATO fight this war by themselves." I thought EU/NATO specifically said that they are not a party to the Ukraine conflict? Yet they are sending military equipment to Ukraine?
    1
  24005.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Hard to define international waters for sure but Spratly is clear where stands just by looking at map." If you look up the Map of International Waters, then the Spratly Islands waters is not part of international waters. Also, Spratly was not part of the Philippines as per the 1898 Treaty of Paris that Spain signed with America. When China claimed the Spratly Islands in 1947, the Philippines, the Vietnamese, even the Americans did not object to China's claim.
    1
  24006.  @bartonlee3594  "MaybeifRussiaNEVERinvadedUkraineinthefirstplace,wewouldnotevenbehavingthisdiscussionnow." Hypothetical examples are just that. Maybe if NATO had listened to Russia's concerns about its eastward expansion, right up to Russia's doorstep, then we won't be having this discussion now. But we have to face reality, and isn't it a good thing at least that China is committed to bringing a peaceful resolution to the conflict in Ukraine?
    1
  24007.  @item6931  Speaking of territorial waters, every year the US has been sending warships to the South China Sea and into Chinese territorial waters. 2023: The USS Milius sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2022: The USS _Benfold _ sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2021: The USS Curtis Wilbur sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2020: The USS Mustin sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2019: The USS Wayne E. Meyer sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2018: The USS Higgins and the USS Antietam sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2017: The USS Chafee sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. 2016: The USS Curtis Wilbur sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands. ...
    1
  24008.  @item6931  "Shenzhou does this constantly. It does not reflect well." Didn't you already post this earlier? Earlier you said: ">no, it's because your points were already refuted in my previous posts and your current post is only repeating the points I refuted previously. This is exactly what Shenzhou does." so it appears that you yourself repeat statements.
    1
  24009.  @item6931  You said: "because territorial waters "cannot exceed 12nm in width." But those US warships specifically sailed to within 12 NM of the Paracel Islands, so they are trespassing onto Chinese territorial waters. For example, in 2019, the USS McCampbell sailing within 12 nautical miles of the Paracel Island chain, so they are violating Chinese territorial waters.
    1
  24010.  @item6931  The U.S. officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Higgins guided-missile destroyer and the Antietam, a guided-missile cruiser, came within 12 nautical miles of the Paracel Islands, among a string of islets, reefs and shoals over which China has territorial disputes with its neighbors. - May 27, 2019 _Reuters Exclusive: U.S. warships sail near South China Sea islands claimed by Beijing
    1
  24011.  @item6931  Source: The Diplomat: US Navy Conducts First Freedom of Navigation Operation of 2019 in South China Sea (dated January 8, 2019) On Monday, a U.S. Navy Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer sailed near islands disputed between China, Vietnam, and Taiwan in the South China Sea. USS McCampbell, the destroyer, carried out a new freedom of navigation operation, sailing within 12 nautical miles of islands in the Paracel Islands group in the South China Sea...”
    1
  24012.  @item6931  Source: The Guardian: US warship sails near disputed island in South China Sea (dated to 2nd Jul 2017) The USS Stethem, a guided-missile destroyer, sailed within 12 nautical miles of Triton Island, part of the Paracel Islands in the South China Sea...
    1
  24013.  @bartonlee3594  China brokered rapprochement deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia, after decades of enmity. We need more countries interested in making peace than in creating conflict.
    1
  24014.  @bartonlee3594  "Nobody wanted the Russians in E. Europe after WWII." Studies have shown that not only did the Soviet Union suffered the most casualties of WWII, but the USSR also inflicted the most casualties onto the Germans during WWII. Yet the Europeans dismiss the Soviet Union's contributions to WWII?
    1
  24015.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Do you like President Putin? Do you think he is a good autocratic leader?" Vladimir Putin enjoys a high approval among Russians. In April 2023, over 80 percent of Russians approved of activities of the Russian President Vladimir Putin. As a Chinese, I do feel that Putin does whatever is best in Russia's interests, no matter the cost. And since you asked me, then I shall ask you in return. Do you like President Joe Biden? Do you think he is a good democratic leader?
    1
  24016.  @bartonlee3594  But in Europe, the USSR contributions to WWII are ignored, and Russophobia has gripped many of its people. Russian people are being demonized, whether it's Russian musicians, Russian composers, Russian chess players, tennis players, athletes, sportsmen, etc.
    1
  24017.  @bartonlee3594  "And no one is "demonizing" the Russian people." Are you serious? Look at Chelsea owner, Roman Abramovich, being forced to hand over his football club, just because he's Russian. Or Russian chess champion Sergey Karjakin being banned from competing? Russian orchestra conductor Valery Gergiev was sacked by the Munich Philharmonic, just because he's Russian. There's more examples too numerous to list here.
    1
  24018.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "No one suffers more than Russia from Putin's despotism and oligarchical control of the Russian state." Well, like I said earlier, Vladimir Putin enjoys high approval among Russians. In April 2023, over 80 percent of Russians approved of activities of the Russian President Vladimir Putin. And mind you this survey was conducted by Levada center, which is an independent polling agency.
    1
  24019.  @bartonlee3594  If that's really the case then why have Western companies pulled out of Russia? NATO is depriving common working-class Russian people of access to Western brands, like Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Netflix, and especially McDonald's, causing the loss of jobs for the common working-class Russian people. Even Russian culture is demonized in the West, such as Tchaikovsky and Yuri Gagarin.
    1
  24020.  @bartonlee3594  So what charges are being filed against Abramovich that would lead to seizure of his football club? According to Western law, you can't just arrest someone who has committed no crime, and then proceed to seize his private assets just like that without lawful procedure. And what crime did Russian chess player Sergey Karjakin or Russian conductor Valery Gergiev commit?
    1
  24021.  @laser-tv2jq  The whole "debt trap" diplomacy has proven to be a myth. Research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country.
    1
  24022.  @khangnguyenthaiduy9129  So with regards to Hambantota Port, at least we agree that it's win-win cooperation between China and Sri Lanka? As for Britain, it wasn't win-win, they controlled every aspect of Hong Kong, from its education system to its politics, and it's all at once, not a gradual affair. Whereas Hambantota Port was leased to Chinese companies to develop for 99 years.
    1
  24023.  @khangnguyenthaiduy9129  I'd admit that you're knowledgeable of Hong Kong's colonial history under Britain. Yes, Hong Kong was previously a poor backwater port, before British colonization transformed it into a prosperous port city. But what some people in Hong Kong fail to realize, is that Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy while it was British colony, and it's only after the 1997 handover/return that the people of Hong Kong could finally vote in elections for their favorite leaders. It's a product of Hong Kong's education system under Britain that cultivated this sense of un-patriotism among some of its people. As for Sri Lanka, given that you know Hong Kong's colonial history, what makes you think that China would do the same to Sri Lanka, given what Britain did to China in Hong Kong?
    1
  24024.  @khangnguyenthaiduy9129  You're clearly knowledgeable about the British colonization of Hong Kong, why you seem to think China will do the same to Sri Lanka, what Britain did to China? China is NOT Britain (neither is Britain China) yet you're predicting what China will do base on British actions? When we are both vastly different cultures with different histories? Britain acquired the entire port city of Hong Kong, including its education system and its government, whereas Hambantota Port was leased to Chinese companies to develop for 99 years. Yet why do you keep on claiming that China controls the port? It just looks like you're obfuscating Chinese companies with China. Sri Lankan government clearly still have their own government, own education system and so on, so the comparison between Hong Kong and Sri Lanka is only superficial at best.
    1
  24025.  @khangnguyenthaiduy9129  You asked "What about you? Why do you think that China will be better than Britain?" I draw upon China's long history. Throughout it's 5,000 years of history, China did not colonize overseas countries, unlike 18th century Britain, so why do you assume China will follow in Britain's footsteps? There are periods in history where China's naval power was arguably the most advanced in the world. For example, between 1405 and 1433, the Chinese Admiral Zheng He led seven voyages throughout the India Ocean, visiting Africa, India and the Middle East. Zheng He led an armada of over 300 vessels with some ships being 5-7 times larger than Columbus' Santa Maria flagship. Yet Zheng He's mission was about peaceful trade with other countries, not one of conquest like the Western colonial powers that came later. As a result, China had never founded any overseas colony, so why do you think China is about to start now?
    1
  24026.  @Giveupthecraic  People like you that refuse to accept that the war's already over.
    1
  24027.  @vladimirv.g.1436  You said: "Then don't mind your country to lose sovereignty independence, resources and land in return of what you call Peace." Your country will definitely lose all of those if they choose to continue on a path of War. A peace deal will ensure your country will at least retain some of those things you mentioned.
    1
  24028.  @lentinant  1. "every single NATO actor did claim that Ukraine will not join NATO." Could we have that in writing please? A written NATO declaration that Ukraine will not join, would do wonders to resolve the conflict in Ukraine. Not just more talk. 2. "What about thousands of kilometers of shared border with NATO country," Which NATO country are you referring to? Is the shared border bigger or less than the shared border of Russia with Ukraine? 3. "Except there are NATO bases with actual nuclear weapons and which would have lower arrival time than most rockets from Ukraine." Could we have examples of these NATO bases you are referring to? 4. "Or maybe, just maybe it was to ensure that russia would not do any tricks" What tricks are you talking about?
    1
  24029.  @elenamoulin3252  1. Had Ukraine really didn't want to join NATO, then why didn't Ukraine declare it? Put in writing a declaration that Ukraine will not join NATO. Such a declaration would do wonders to allay Russia's security concerns. Also, the Ukraine conflict began in 2014 not in 2022. 2. Never said that, I wrote that Ukraine's security and territorial integrity would have been secured had it chosen NOT to join NATO and threaten Russia's security interests. Please stop twisting my words. 3. Every state has security needs. If you constantly neglect Russia's security needs then it don't be surprised if they launch a special military operation to security their interests.
    1
  24030.  @elenamoulin3252  You keep saying Ukraine did not want to join NATO, then why didn't Ukraine made a declaration NOT to join NATO? Put it in writing that Ukraine will not join NATO, and that would have gone a long way to allay Russia's security concerns. Ukraine would have been far better off staying as a neutral country between Russia and NATO.
    1
  24031.  @elenamoulin3252  Why didn't Ukraine spell out clearly that Ukraine would not join NATO? Also the Baltic States already being in NATO doesn't mean Russia will want another NATO member on their border, so how does the argument not make sense? Baltic States already in NATO, means Russia will tolerate Ukraine's entry? Furthermore the Russia-Ukraine border is longer, which means more area to be defended.
    1
  24032.  @elenamoulin3252  Again, I did not neglect Ukraine's security needs I wrote that Ukraine's security and territorial integrity would have been secured had it chosen NOT to join NATO and threaten Russia's security interests.. You're the one constantly neglecting Russia's security needs, which is the important deciding factor that led to Russia launching this special military operation. As long as you continue to ignore Russia's security interests, then you will continue get conflict in Ukraine.
    1
  24033. ​ @dutchtravelguy7306  It was US that violated the Budapest Memorandum first in 2014 when Ukraine's sovereignty were violated by the 2014 Maiidan Revolution (orchestrated by the US) which ousted Viktor Yanukovych and installed a US pupet government in power in Kiev. We know this from voice audio recordings of Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt (then US ambassador to Ukraine). As for Crimea, they held a referendum in which an overwhelming majority (96%) of Crimeans voted to join the Russian Federation.
    1
  24034.  @Anonerak2  You said: "NATO is a defensive alliance, not an offensive organisation." NATO is NOT defensive alliance. Look, in 1999 they bombed Yugoslavia even though Yugoslavia did not attack any NATO country, so how can you claim they are a defensive alliance? They can attack any country without first being attacked, that's why Russia considers it a hostile organisation and that Ukraine joining NATO would pose a security concern for Russia.
    1
  24035.  @Anonerak2  You said: "it is not the main purpose of NATO and it would have and should have been done," Not only was Yugoslavia bombed in 1999, but NATO even invaded Libya in 2001, even though Libya did not attack any NATO member, so how can you continue calling NATO a defensive alliance? I've already shown they can attack any country without themselves being attacked first, so why continue to call NATO defensive? That's why it's considered a hostile organization by Russia and that Ukraine joining NATO would pose a security concern for Russia. Because they can attack any country they choose. You said: "The purpose of NATO is to ensure safety for its members not to attack Russia." Really? Then why was Russia's application to join NATO rejected then? Russia's entry into NATO would not only enhance NATO's capabilities, but also allay Russia's security concerns about it being a hostile organization. Yet why was Russia not allowed into NATO? That would have solved a lot of problems, but since Russia was not allowed into NATO, then Russia has no choice but to consider it a hostile organization. Especially since they can target any country without themselves first being attacked.
    1
  24036.  @cs8mv  You said: "Don't commit genocides and expect people not to react." That was exactly what Ukraine been doing since 2014 with the War in Donbas. Ukraine has been shelling Donetsk and Lughansk (collectively known as Donbas) and around 14,200–14,400 have been killed over the course of 8 years. Most of the people living in Donbas are ethnic Russians, and by 2022, Russia couldn't stand it any longer, formally recognized Donetsk and Lughansk republics and launched the special military operation to defend the two republics.
    1
  24037.  @cs8mv  You said: "Tell me, why should Europe tolerate Russia aggressively threatening their security," Tell me which EU country's security has been aggressively threatened by Russia? Is it France? Or Germany? In fact, EU continues to import Russian oil (They bought €22 billion of fossil fuels from Russia in 2024), so which EU country's security is being threatened by Russia? Why would Russia want to target its own customers who buy its oil, you tell me? You said: "Would Russia tolerate nuclear weapons in an European enclave next to Moscow?" Of course not. That's the primary reason why Russia is against NATO expansion. It can't be help that some of Russia's neighboring countries have already joined NATO (and could potentially station missiles aimed at Moscow) but there's no way Russia would tolerate Ukraine's entry into NATO and make Ukrainian land a holding ground for NATO missiles. You said: "Would Russia tolerate getting people assassinated on their soil?" Of course not. Look at the civilian Alexander Dugin's daughter, who was killed by car bomb in Moscow. Or of Igor Kirillov also killed by car bomb in Moscow. Ukraine was behind these two assassinations.
    1
  24038.  @cs8mv  You said: "Russia's argument stating that Ukraine does not acutally exist but has always been part of Russia and it was a historical mistake that has to be undone," Because it's true. Ukraine today is comprised of territory that was historically part of Poland, Lithuania, Austria, Tsarist Russia and of course, the Soviet Union. The name Ukraine is derived from the old Slavic word for "borderland" as is the word krajina. In fact the Russian territory of Crimea was transferred to Ukraine by the Bolsheviks to mark the 300 anniversary of Ukraine's entry into the Soviet Union. In 1990, the Soviet Union dissolved, Ukraine became independent and suddenly many Russians living in Crimea found themselves stranded in Ukraine and no longer part of their motherland. Putin felt that the Soviet Union's decision to transfer historical Russian territory to become part of Ukraine was a mistake that has to be undone. Russians living in Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, etc have been the subjected to numerous attacks by Kiev, and Putin feels that it is Russia's duty to protect Russian speaking people everywhere (even if they aren't residing in Russia). So when the 2014 Crimea referendum revealed an overwhelming majority (96%) of Crimeans voted to (re)join the Russian Federation, Russia decided to honor the referendum's results and made Crimea part of Russia again.
    1
  24039.  @Anonerak2  Then NATO is clearly NOT a defensive alliance, since their members can just cook up any excuse to attack any country, even without themselves being attacked first. Another example is NATO's military intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina, even though no NATO country was attacked first, so how can you continue to call NATO a defensive alliance? They can make up any excuse to attack any country, without being attacked first, that's why Russia considers it a hostile organization and won't tolerate Ukraine's entry into NATO. Other NATO countries have territorial grievances with other NATO members. For example, Turkey and Greece have territorial dispute with each other. Also, how is Russia not a democracy when just recently, Russia held elections in 2024? Meanwhile, Zelensky's term as president expired in May 2024 and he's not calling for any elections in Ukraine since. You said: "as NATO's main purpose is to protect countries from Russian aggression." Then is apparent that NATO is against Russia from the beginning, why can't Russia consider it a hostile organization given that it refused entry for Russia and continues to threaten Russia? If your organization constantly treat Russia as the enemy, then it's no surprise that Russia has security concerns regarding NATO and would launch military operations to defend its security interests. Because your organization created the current situation, and yet pretends to be a defensive alliance.
    1
  24040. -China is the 3rd country in the world to demonstrate anti-satellite capabilities. Indian satellites aren't safe. -China has tested hypersonic missiles such as DF-17 that travel many times speed of sound and difficult to intercept. -China has world's longest range ICBM, the DF-41, that can hit India from way beyond the Tibetan plateau -China has missiles with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle (MIRV) capability. -China has anti-ship ballistic missiles, like DF-21 nicknamed "Carrier killer" that can target ships, from safety of the land. -China is 2nd country in the world, besides USA, to actively operate stealth fighters, like Chengdu J-20 in our air force. -China manufactures our own combat drones, like CaiHong-5 which have been compared to US Reaper combat drone. -China has successfully mounted and tested a railgun on our vessels. Wartime might push this development further. -China manufactures our own tanks, fighters, ammunition and equipment, whereas India has to rely in importing foreign military hardware to replace losses.
    1
  24041. Peng Shuai has expressed her desire for privacy and that's why she's been avoiding the public eye for weeks. However, Western MSM are demanding that she appear in public and bare her private life for all the world to see, instead of respecting her wish for privacy.
    1
  24042.  @NightTimeDay  "神州 Shenzhou Silence, shill." You can't refute my point so you resort to labelling me a shill for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours? Peng Shuai had written an email to WTA saying that the allegations of sexual assault were not true, and she also criticised the WTA for releasing unverified information without her consent.
    1
  24043.  @NightTimeDay  Earlier you said: "Check out the Laowhy video on the topic." laowhy86 has a reputation for lying to his audiences, just look at the video he made with serpentza, claiming that Dune movie posters in China excluded black actress Sharon Ducan-Brewster. But this claim has been since been debunked, because the Dune movie posters in China do feature Sharon in them. Then what makes you think laowhy86 is a reliable source when it comes to China ?
    1
  24044.  @NightTimeDay  Why'd you recommend others to watch laowhy86's video on the topic, when he's has a history of lying to his audiences? If anything, it sounds like you're the one behaving like a shill here.
    1
  24045.  @NightTimeDay  "神州 Shenzhou lol very convincing, assault denier." I read Peng Shuai's post on Reddit, and she has had a tumultuous, on-and-off relation with a much older man, but where are the allegations of sexual assault in Peng Shuai's post? Peng Shuai even written an email to WTA saying that the allegations of sexual assault were not true, and she even criticised the WTA for releasing unverified information without her consent. Even the CNN has not independently verified the claim.
    1
  24046.  @NightTimeDay  You know laowhy86 even made a video talking about Uighurs using emojis as some sort of secret code on Douyin (Tik Tok) videos and it turns out that if you access the origin Douyin videos, there were no emojis. It was laowhy86 that digitally edited them to insert emojis and then claim that it's some sort of secret code, so why continue to believe him given his history of lying to me his audiences?
    1
  24047.  @NightTimeDay  How much do you get paid to recommend laowhy86 given his history of lying?
    1
  24048.  @NightTimeDay  It was a screenshot of her email (as proof) before she sent it. Steve Simon of the WTA had received the email, he wrote on WTA website that: "I have a hard time believing that Peng Shuai actually wrote the email we received or believes what is being attributed to her."
    1
  24049.  @NightTimeDay  I've shown that the WTA received the email, from the Steve Simons own words. And now Peng has appeared on IOC video call clearly expressing her desire for privacy, but Western MSM and WTA are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see, instead of respecting her wishes.
    1
  24050.  @NightTimeDay  "神州 Shenzhou...an inhumane genocide denier. The CCP is the modern equivalent of Nazi Germany." Nazi Germany promoted racial supremacy and Hitler demonized the Jews as inferior in their Nazi propaganda. If the communist party is the modern equivalent of Nazi Germany, then we should be seeing similar demonization of the ethnic minorities (i.e Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchu, etc) by the Han majority. However, in China the ethnic minorities are exempted from the One-Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Ethnic minorities in China enjoy special privileges over the Han, such as tax exemptions, priority in healthcare, free education for up to 15 years, government bursaries, and so on. When applying for university admission, if a Han candidate needs say 600 points to qualify for the university course, then an ethnic minority needs only say 300 points (which easier to qualify) for the exact same course. Isn't China offering privileges to ethnic minorities the complete reverse of what the Nazis did to Jews through anti-semitism? How then is China the modern equivalent of Nazi Germany?
    1
  24051.  @youwanteat  If you claim Taiwan is independent, then why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations? Is there something preventing Taiwan from joining the UN like an independent country can? Why is it Taiwan cannot formally declare independence without incurring serious consequences?
    1
  24052.  @youwanteat  So Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can, then you've just proven that Taiwan isn't independent. Even at the Olympics, athletes from Taiwan can only compete under the name "Chinese Taipei" then this already shows that Taiwan is not independent after all.
    1
  24053.  @youwanteat  Even pandemic? Taiwan cannot even join the World Health Organization, this should already illustrate the fact that Taiwan is not independent. Taiwan cannot even formally declare independence without incurring serious consequences, so is this really independence?
    1
  24054. If God created humans, then why did He include tailbones in humans? Could it be that Homo Sapiens actually evolved from animals like monkeys and apes according to Dawin's Theory of Evolution?
    1
  24055.  @sethtan6306  But majority of Singaporeans vote for the PAP all the same, just like the people of North Korea also vote Kim Jung un isn't it? And your current female President of Singapore (Halima Yacob) wasn't even voted into power at all, so Singapore clearly isn't a true democracy, no matter how people claim they have the right to vote. And majority of the Hong Kong protestors are high school kids who haven't even graduated from school yet they already think they know how to best govern Hong Kong? Their teenage minds haven't even matured, and they haven't even stepped out into the real working world of adults, yet they already got swept up in political fervor and throw away their bright future just like that.
    1
  24056.  @sethtan6306  When did I ever said Singapore is the same as North Korea? All I am pointing out is that majority of Singaporeans vote for PAP, just like North Koreans voting for Kim, that's all. And your President of Singapore wasn't voted into power. I mean, did you vote for Halima Yacob or against her? And even if you vote for the opposition, it is still PAP that has been in power for 50 years in Singapore. If your opposition party is lousy, then what's the whole point of opposition then? Might as well be a single party PAP and there will be no significant difference isn't it? A weak and incompetent opposition party might as well be non-existent, why bother having an opposition in the first place? Is the PAP clearly "tricking" you into thinking you have some semblance of democracy? Hong Kong had been under authoritarian British colonial rule from 1841-1997, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before?
    1
  24057.  @sethtan6306  Did you vote for your President of Singapore? No? Did PAP rule Singapore for the last 50 years? Is your opposition party pathetic? Do Singapore citizens face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly? Then there's hardly any reason that Singapore actually qualifies as Western democracy isn't that right?
    1
  24058.  @sethtan6306   Excuse me, but when did I ever speak highly of Western democracy? And in my earlier question, when did I ever said Singapore is the same as North Korea? Why are you seemingly putting words in my mouth? Can you quote me my words, where I speak highly of Western democracy? Because I never said such things.
    1
  24059.  @sethtan6306  Again, when did I ever speak highly of Western democracy? Where did I ever said anything about Western democracy being superior at all? You are just putting words in my mouth when I never said such things. You can't even quote my words that spoke highly of Western democracy, so why are you making up things I never said?
    1
  24060.  @sethtan6306   Who's critiquing your system? Look this my first comment addressed to you @Seth Tan  Exactly, Singapore’s authoritarian single-party PAP dictatorship provides economic stability for Singapore and that's why Singapore is so prosperous despite being in a stifling political environment for over 50 years. Just like China is prosperous under authoritarian single-party CCP rule for 70 years. So where did I critique your political system then? And how about quoting those words you keep on putting in my mouth, such as "Singapore is the same as North Korea" or that I spoke highly of Western democracy?
    1
  24061. 老实说 翻墙后 就觉得很多美国人无知，已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24062. 听这些美国人整天喷中国美食，不觉得很烦恼吗？
    1
  24063.  @InnerMostFlame  "神州 Shenzhou Not to argue but yes they do make plans! Some plans become law, others who come to power can keep the plans or adjust it." They can also cancel the previous plans made by the previous president. For example, Obama administration had been working on Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) deal for about 8 years, but when President Trump came to power, he just cancelled TPP and withdrew America from it, simply because Trump don't like Obama (Obama humiliated Trump with his birth cert). All that money invested in to making the TPP work, is gone just like that. Therefore, USA is incapable of making any long-term plans against China. Meanwhile, China has a list of goals to achieve by 2050, and here's a brief sampling: -By 2020, China plans to eliminate poverty completely and establish moderately prosperous society. -By 2025, China plans to transform our manufacturing industry to incorporate high-end technology. -By 2030, China plans to be world leader in Artificial Intelligence -By 2035, China plans to be key innovative, scientific power and establish moderately socialist society. -By 2040, China plans to ban all fossil fuel powerplants and all non-electric vehicles for greener future. -By 2045, China plans to be world leading space nation, having established a space elevator. -By 2050, China plans to have surpassed the USA as global superpower, economically and militarily. Source: Xi Plans to Turn China Into a Leading Global Power by 2050 bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-17/xi-to-put-his-stamp-on-chinese-history-at-congress-party-opening By abolishing the presidential term limit, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come into fruition in the future. But US presidents are limited to short-term plans and unable to make long term plans (spanning say 10 years or more) for America's future, because of US president term limits.
    1
  24064.  @InnerMostFlame  I did. And I added on to your point by highlighting that US presidents can also cancel plans as well, as seen in the Trump cancelling TPP.
    1
  24065.  @InnerMostFlame  Where did you said that?
    1
  24066.  @edward8972  What's so suspicious about what Eileen is doing?
    1
  24067.  @hamiorg  You said: "神州 Shenzhou that was a view they had before the pandemic, now that perception has changed as many companies have moved their manufacturing elsewhere because of supply issues." China was literally the largest recipient of new foreign direct investment in 2020, overtaking the US for the first time according to UN figures. The Chinese economy brought in 163 billion dollars in investment compared to the 134 billion attracted by the United States in 2020, so if anything, isn't this an indication that foreign investment in China remains at an all time high?
    1
  24068.  @hamiorg  My bad, I forgot to add the fact that manufacturing makes up a quarter of China's foreign investment. Here's the breakdown of what foreign investment in China goes into: -Manufacturing (25.5%) -Real estate (17.0%) -Leasing and business services (16.0%) -Information transmission, computer services and software (10.6%) -Scientific research, technical service and geologic prospecting (8.0%) -Wholesale and retail trade (6.5%) -Financial intermediation (5.1%) -Transport, storage and post (3.3%) -Production and supply of electricity, gas and water (2.5%) -Construction (0.8%) ...
    1
  24069.  @alexlazar4738  But however, we cannot just separate the prosperous coastal region of China from the rest of the country. China's western provinces like Xinjiang & Tibet, are an inalienable part of China and therefore, China needs to bring development from the coastal cities to those landlocked regions, which is what China's Belt and Road Initiative hopes to achieve. This one reason why China is still classified as a developing country.
    1
  24070.  @hamiorg  Did you hear the news about how Elon Musk came under fire from Americans after the Tesla CEO opened a new showroom in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region in China? It just goes to show that despite rumors of a decoupling between USA and China, it's unlikely to happen, as American companies continue to expand in China.
    1
  24071.  @petehagen8638  The CEOs of Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple have all testified in Congress about whether China steals US technology from their companies. The 4 CEOs were each asked whether they know of any instances where China stole technology from their companies. 3 of the 4 answered No and only Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook said Yes (but can you trust Facebook?). So what does this mean when the 3 out of 4 of the top American companies testified that China did not steal U.S technology from their companies?
    1
  24072.  @petehagen8638  "神州 Shenzhou It means they have been compromised by Communist China's money and hope of doing business in China." Dude, Facebook and Google are blocked in China, what even makes you think these companies have been compromised by Chinese money?
    1
  24073.  @petehagen8638  Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why the 4 American monopolies Apple, Google, Facebook and Amazon dominate their respective industries, having eliminated the competition from smaller American firms, stifling innovation through competition in the process. Whereas China is implementing an anti-monopoly law, to crackdown on anti-competitive practices on Chinese big tech firms like Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, and so on. This helps "free up space" in the market for smaller Chinese firms to emerge and compete, and even allowing innovation through competition to take place.
    1
  24074.  @lastChang  Eileen Gu choose to represent China of her own accord, how is this stealing?
    1
  24075.  @hamiorg  My complaints about Western MSM is about how they keep painting China as "the enemy" in hopes of starting a possible hot war between U.S and China, which would not only be deleterious for both our countries, but for the entire world itself. So we should strive to avoid conflict, and you know what's the primary reason preventing U.S from going to war with China? It's because our economies are coupled. Decoupling of US-China would isolate both our countries economies, and this actually makes it easier for the U.S to launch a war with China, if they didn't have to worry about losing their biggest trade partner. Therefore, why should I want to China's economy to decouple from the USA? That would make the scenario of a hot war between U.S and China more likely, if our economies were decoupled.
    1
  24076.  @griefg2967  Tyranny? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  24077.  @brexitgreens  This is reminisce of the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, where the Soviet Union deployed missiles to independent country Cuba. Such a move was perceived as an existential threat to the USA. Many applauded U.S President Kennedy for his strong stance and refusal to back down, and eventually the Soviets withdrew those missiles. Likewise, Ukraine joining NATO would allow NATO to deploy troops and missiles to Ukraine, thus posing an existential threat to Russia (the same as Cuba for the USA in 1962).
    1
  24078.  @brexitgreens  Putin has publicly stated that Russia doesn't have any plans to occupy Ukraine, his stated goals are clear, calling for the demilitarisation and de-Nazification of Ukraine. Since 2014, Ukraine has been supporting ultra-nationalist, neo-nazis like the Azov Battalion that's carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Luhansk and Donetsk. Over the course of 8 years, over 13,000 people have been killed in the Donbas region by shelling (by both sides). Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that began since the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukovych by USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine.
    1
  24079. There's even a growing list of news headlines 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. CNN: Forget the trade war, China's economy has other big problems 2019. BBC: China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? 2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the Chinese Debt Crisis 2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall Started? ... Yet China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  24080.  @jspringer86  John Cena realized he had made a mistake in public, and he had the courage to apologize for his mistake (in Mandarin no less) so is there something wrong with a man admitting to his mistakes and apologizing for it?
    1
  24081.  @MichaelPhillips-jw4bj  What Chinese concentration camps are you talking about? The United States literally has Guantanamo Bay Detention Center for crying out loud.
    1
  24082.  @MichaelPhillips-jw4bj  John Boyega was shrunk in Star Wars posters in China to make way for the cool Sci-fi starships (which were enlarged/given more prominence in the posters) because these are what that will potentially attract Chinese audience to watch the movie.
    1
  24083.  @jspringer86  Where is Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed? If not, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  24084. @Leonardo Pereira How am I brainwashed? Have you read Taiwan's own constitution? It says that Taiwan is part of China, and since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. John Cena made a mistake on TV and he regretted it and actually apologised for his mistake (in Mandarin no less)
    1
  24085.  @caseya463  Can't I present China's side of the story? If you disagree with my points, then why not attempt to refute my points instead of telling me to get lost?
    1
  24086.  @abbotsful  Yet where's the uproar over actual false imprisonment and ongoing torture in Guantanamo Bay?
    1
  24087.  @abbotsful  1. So clearly YouTube policy itself allows channel owners to delete comments on their channel, then it's YouTube policy that you're complaining about. 2. So since you can't prove it, and given that you commented on the "speed and accuracy of the censorship" that means it's just not humanly possible for Cyrus to delete your comment, and the most logical conclusion is that YouTube was responsible for the deletion. 3. I didn't talk s**t about you, that's a hypothetical scenario like you said. But since you can't prove it, then the logical conclusion is that YouTube deleted your comment, given the speed and accuracy of the censorship.
    1
  24088.  @abbotsful  But you already admitted that you can't prove it, and since you remarked "given the speed and accuracy of the censorship" then the logical conclusion is that YouTube was responsible for the deletion.
    1
  24089.  Dumb & Dumber  Good news coming out from Evergrande, they have resumed construction on 95% of their projects and is targeting sales of 1 billion yuan ($152.26 million) during China's Golden Week holiday.
    1
  24090.  @mjouwbuis  If you claim Taiwan is an independent country, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations as an independent country? Is there a force that's preventing Taiwan from joining the UN like an independent country can?
    1
  24091.  @TheRealCheckmate  Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us. I mean, when you return a state back to a country, the state should follow that country's ideology, yet China made an exception and introduced a 1 Country, 2 Systems policy to allow gradual transition of Hong Kong back fully part of China.
    1
  24092.  @yerri5567  I did as you instructed, and I found those Google images show PLAAF jet's flight path taking extreme precautions to avoid intruding into Taiwan's actual airspace. But Taiwan's ADIZ is insanely huge, even extending towards actual mainland airspace. And I couldn't find examples where PLAAF aircraft flew closer to Taiwan than mainland China, could you perhaps specify those dates?
    1
  24093.  @yerri5567  You said: "Especially considering the fact that half of it isnt even realistic since half is designated on mainland territory." Exactly. Around half of Taiwan's ADIZ extends into mainland territory itself, meaning that PLAAF jet's travelling in mainland airspace are recorded. It's insane how huge Taiwan's ADIZ is as you can see from the images. You asked: "What is Taiwan's "actual" airspace?" A county's airspace is defined as the portion of the atmosphere controlled by a country above its territory, including its territorial waters. That means it encompasses region of Taiwan island as well as 12 Nautical Miles of territorial waters around the island. But PLAAF jet flew further than 12 NM away from Taiwan island, so they did not intrude into Taiwan's airspace.
    1
  24094.  @yerri5567  You said: "Im not sure why half of Taiwans ADIZ is in mainland China... Taiwans regional neighbours ADIZs are even larger." If you look up the origin of those ADIZs, you'll find that: -Taiwan's ADIZ was designed and created by the United States Armed Forces (USAF) after World War II. -Japan's ADIZ was created by the United States Armed Forces (USAF) after World War II. -South Korea's ADIZ zone was established in 1951, during the Korean War, by the United States Air Force to block communist forces. ... So if you connect the dots, you can see who is the mastermind behind establishing these ADIZs to contain China's rise. "By your explanation, PRCs ADIZ also holds no water." Your question was: "What is Taiwan's "actual" airspace?" and I explained what is the definition of airspace. But where in my explanation (that you quoted) did I talk about ADIZ?
    1
  24095.  @yerri5567  "My first comment was about ADIZ." But the question you asked was (and I quote your words) "What is Taiwan's "actual" airspace?" ... I gave an explanation: "A county's airspace is defined as the portion of the atmosphere controlled by a country above its territory, including its territorial waters. That means it encompasses region of Taiwan island as well as 12 Nautical Miles of territorial waters around the island. But PLAAF jet flew further than 12 NM away from Taiwan island, so they did not intrude into Taiwan's airspace." (which you quoted) ... Then you said: "By your explanation, PRCs ADIZ also holds no water." so where in my explanation did I talk about ADIZ? You even specifically quoted my explanation, so why are you suddenly jumping back to your first comment? It's like you're trying to move the goal post after founding out that you're been cornered. You said: "I also can make that comparison with PRCs ADIZ, Japan and US etc flying into ADIZ thats closer to Japan than mainland China." Alright, where's the example of Japanese jets in China's ADIZ that's flying closer to Japan than mainland China, if you want such a comparison? And in case you didn't know, the U.S jets in China's ADIZ are so much farther from the American mainland as compared to the Chinese mainland.
    1
  24096.  @yerri5567  You first quoted my explanation, then you said "By your explanation, PRCs ADIZ also holds no water." so it's evident that you're referring to my explanation. But where in my explanation did I talk about ADIZ? I was explaining the definition of airspace, then why'd you quote my explanation when it has nothing to do with ADIZ (which is a separate definition from a country's airspace)? And why'd you suddenly jump to your first comment being about ADIZ, when it's clear that you're referring to my explanation of what airspace is? Isn't that moving the goalpost? You said: "You realise comparisons can be hypothetical right?" So now you're comparing real events (that PLAAF jet's flight path was closer to mainland China than Taiwan) with hypothetical examples? That basically means that you have no concrete argument against mine. And again, which U.S jet has flown into China's ADIZ on the East China Sea?
    1
  24097.  @yerri5567  "By using the word "also", Im implying the LOGIC behind your explanation also satisfies the point Ive raised." Once again, how? My explanation was about a country's airspace, defined as the portion of the atmosphere above the country, including territorial waters (i.e 12 NM around the shoreline). Airspace and ADIZ are separate terms, so how does the logic of my explanation (which you quoted btw) satisfy the point you raised? "My comment was in response to your comment that was responding to my comment before that etc." But we are talking about my explanation (which you clearly highlighted) and my explanation was in response to your question: "What is Taiwan's" actual airspace?" so why are you suddenly tracing the comments back to the beginning? Even you clearly stated "By your explanation," (and you quoted it) now you're moving the goalpost by claiming that it's about ADIZ? "These are REAL events. Yet you still bring up that the paths were closer to mainland China than Taiwan?" Why not? Those are REAL events too, that PLAAF jet's flew closer to mainland China than Taiwan. Whereas you're the one who gave hypothetical examples to compare with real events here. "And does it have to be jets at this point?" Since we are talking about airspace, then of course we're talking about jets isn't it?
    1
  24098. Taiwan is an inseparable part of China......
    1
  24099. Taiwan is an inseparable part of China.....
    1
  24100. Taiwan is an inseparable part of China....
    1
  24101. Taiwan is an inseparable part of China.........
    1
  24102. China's Propaganda is no match for the U.S propaganda.
    1
  24103. China's Propaganda is no match for the U.S propaganda..
    1
  24104. China's Propaganda can't hold a candle to the U.S propaganda.
    1
  24105.  @gracesutton1359  Red Scare is the promotion of a widespread fear of a potential rise of communism (whether real or imagined). Yellow Peril is a racial colour-metaphor that depicts the peoples of East and Southeast Asia as an existential danger to the Western world (whether real or imagined). Maybe perhaps you've never heard of these terms because Westerners are reluctant to admit that they exist.
    1
  24106.  @gracesutton1359  Yellow Peril exists even if you've never heard of this term. For example, the EU diplomat Josep Borrell made a speech at the inauguration of the European Diplomatic Academy, where he said: "The EU is a garden, while the rest of the world is a jungle, and that the garden must be protected from the jungle." The whole statement reeks of Yellow Peril mindset (even if Asians aren't specifically mentioned), because it's a manifestation of the fears of the West being overrun by other nations.
    1
  24107.  @gracesutton1359  Yellow Peril mentality has been carefully hidden, but during this pandemic times, it has reared it's ulgy mug. Asian Americans have seen a whopping 339% increase in hate crimes against them nationwide according to data published by the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism.
    1
  24108.  @gracesutton1359  Yellow Peril mentality has been carefully hidden, but during this pandemic times, it has reared it's head. Asian Americans have seen a whopping 339% increase in attacks against them nationwide according to data published by the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism.
    1
  24109.  @gracesutton1359  Yellow Peril mentality has been carefully hidden, but during this pandemic times, it has reared it's head. Asian Americans have seen a whopping 339% increase in hate crimes against them nationwide.
    1
  24110.  @gracesutton1359  Yellow Peril has been carefully hidden, but during this pandemic times, it has reared it's head. Asian Americans in particular have seen a whopping 339% increase in attacks against them nationwide.
    1
  24111.  @gracesutton1359  They've tried to disguise it, but the Yellow Peril mindset has only gotten worst during pandemic times. Asian Americans in particular, have seen a whopping 339% increase in crimes against them.
    1
  24112.  @Crispin-mf4yo  Agreed. Even Germany has to play along, like when President Biden threatened to to end the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline supplying Germany with gas from Russia. Video: President Biden on Nord Stream 2 Pipeline if Russia Invades Ukraine: "We will bring an end to it." youtu.be/OS4O8rGRLf8 It's a typical example of the United States sacrificing their ally's interests to promote their own U.S interests.
    1
  24113.  @Fauzanarief-n7i  The French eat snails and horsemeat, British eat Rabbit stew, and Australian eat kangaroo meat, so why should China change our eating habits? Because you say so?
    1
  24114.  @arno557  "People eat raw meat with soya sauce is the problem" What Chinese dish involves raw meat with soya sauce? The Japanese eat sushi and sashimi which fits your description.
    1
  24115. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution
    1
  24116. 轮子只靠黑中国吃饭。
    1
  24117. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  24118. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24119. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24120. Even the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24121. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24122. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  24123. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24124.  @francescruz489  Yes. Even though Chinese media use data and statistics, many Western audiences have a hard time believing it. However, Western propagnada is very effective, and lots of people just believe whatever their media says without proof.
    1
  24125.  @francescruz489  Yes. Even though Chinese media use data and statistics, many Western audiences have a hard time believing it. However, propaganda in the West is very effective, and lots of people just believe whatever their media says without proof.
    1
  24126.  @infernobat8325  The EU slapped 10 rounds of sanctions against Russia and it didn't work, so they think an 11th round of sanctions will somehow work?
    1
  24127.  @rolyrodriguez1000  Yet, Putin enjoys high approval among Russians. In April 2023, over 80 percent of Russians approved of activities of the Russian President Vladimir Putin. If those sanctions are meant to get Russians to go against Putin, they surely aren't working.
    1
  24128.  @rolyrodriguez1000  Yet, Putin enjoys high approval among Russians. In April 2023, over 80 percent of Russians approved of activities of the Russian President Vladimir Putin. If those sanctions are meant to get Russians to go against Putin, they surely aren't working.
    1
  24129.  @MarkYeung1  It's astonishing how you can use whataboutism from events from decades ago, and compare them with the protests happening today. Even in Western democracy like France, those protestors are against Macron's pension reform that wasn't put to a vote.
    1
  24130.  @MarkYeung1  It's astonishing how you can use whataboutism from events from decades ago, and compare them with the protests happening today. Especially in France with Macron's pension reform.
    1
  24131.  @meikacamelia3334  Thanks. Sadly, much of the west is overcome with Red Scare (fear of communism) and Yellow Peril (fear of being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiment towards Russia and China.
    1
  24132. So you can't refute my points?
    1
  24133. According to Wikipedia: Qing Dynasty "After conquering "China proper", the Manchus identified their state as "China" (中國, Zhōngguó; "Middle Kingdom"), and the emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, Tibet and other areas) as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that "China" only meant Han areas. The Qing emperors proclaimed that both Han and non-Han peoples were part of "China" and They used both "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their state in official documents, international treaties and foreign affairs."
    1
  24134. The so-called Manchu Empire was named "Qing Dynasty China" and like I said above, they used China and Qing interchangeably to refer to their state in official documents and so on. Look, even Manchuria today is part of China, not that whole of China is part of Manchuria. Its just people like you who refuse to believe the evidence staring at you in the eye.
    1
  24135. And what was this Manchu empire called if not Qing dynasty China? Its obvious that you believe in an alternate history and refuse to face the historical facts presented here.
    1
  24136. China has "One Country, Two Systems" policy, that allows for regions like Hong Kong and Macau to have their own governmental system different from the mainland. No other country has ever had such a system, where two systems exist within in the same country. It's just like having both North Korea and South Korea recognize themselves as a single Korea, while retaining different forms of government.
    1
  24137. Corruption is universal phenomenon. Besides the KMT, even Qing dynasty China and Ming dynasty China had corruption. It is something that countries have to learn to deal with throughout their lives.
    1
  24138. Arguably the only country that cares about Taiwan is mainland China itself. Mainlanders are taught that the people in Taiwan are our brothers and sisters, whereas the United States is only interested in the island's use as a chess piece to contain the mainland's rise. Hopefully more people in Taiwan realise this.
    1
  24139.  @dalidali2757  Why use racist terms like Wuhan Virus Panda? Just because we are Chinese, means you can be racist towards Asians?
    1
  24140.  @aksbeixhev  You said that Canadian court is independent from politics then why did Canada arrest Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou? Because of politics?
    1
  24141. Even the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24142. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24143. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  24144.  @RayQiaoTW  Your 1st source shows Page Not Found. As for the 2nd source, the communist party is providing free education to those Uighurs (many of them are uneducated and illiterate) and training them in skills necessary for the workplace. Even members of the UN Human Rights Council from Africa and the Middle East didn’t offer vocal criticism, so why is the Western governments making noise then? Your 3rd source about social credit system: Westerners often complain about how Chinese people are rude, spit in public, smoke in public, jaywalk, jump queues, speed pass red lights, and other unsavory behavior, when not all Chinese people are like that. What the social credit system hopes to achieve is to discourage such behavior and promote better behavior. But if people persist in their bad behavior until their score becomes unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of the country and make a nuisance of themselves overseas. at least until their score improve. Why is "insulting the national anthem" considered a petty thing? The national anthem is the symbol of the country, so why is insulting it considered petty? Even President Trump himself tweeted that it was "disrespectful" for players not to stand during the playing of the US national anthem. Source: ‘Total disrespect for our great country!’ Trump tweets about NFL’s national anthem non-decision washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2017/10/18/total-disrespect-for-our-great-country-trump-tweets-about-nfls-national-anthem-non-decision/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9265c17f8d4a Its up to your country if you want to erode your own respect for your nation by calling such activities as "petty". But don't expect China to do the same. I mean, the national flag is also a symbol of the country, and desecrating it (burning flags, defacing flags, etc) are considered a crime in many countries, so isn't it the same with national anthems? Source: Flag desecration by country wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_desecration Why is viewing YouTube through a VPN illegal in China? Nobody will arrest you if you view YouTube while in China. So many foreign businesses set up shop in China and many require access to Facebook, YT, etc, so the government grant them a VPN license to do so. So how is VPN illegal in China? I mean, which person has been arrested for viewing YT using VPN while in China?
    1
  24145.  @RayQiaoTW  So what? Many Chinese people travel overseas for work, study or play and they have access to Western internet, yet many still choose to return to China. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists in their lands, buying souvenirs and stimulating your economies. Your schools and universities are positively flooded with international exchange students from China, studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese scientists, researchers, programmers, etc, are working in foreign companies, and Chinese investors are buying up real estates in your lands to develop them. So why do you think Chinese are unaware of what CCP? Chinese people literally can be found all over the world, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all. Yet knowing the CCP, many Chinese still choose to support it, so we are automatically labelled as 五毛 by you? (1) According to the following source, China is not mistreating Muslims in Xinjiang province but is putting some people through training courses to avoid spreading of extremism, unlike Europe which had failed to deal with the problem. Source: China educating, not mistreating, Muslims. dawn.com/news/1432863 (2) Can you actually prove that the Uighurs are being mistreated? And I have already explained how the Social Credit System works to discourage such disgraceful behavior among Chinese and prevent them from buying air tickets out of the country, if their social credit score falls too low. But its not the end of the world for those with low-score, and there are various ways to increase their social credit score to become acceptable. That's part of a Meritocracy after all. (3) I have shown that national anthem is symbolic of a country. Just because people in other countries choose to disrespect it, doesn't mean China has to follow your example. I mean, your flag, your anthem, is the manifestation of your country, so why do you disrespect it? What do you use to symbolize your country, if not a flag or an anthem? (4) Of course. Why should China allow illegal unregistered VPN service providers? All VPN providers should be registered under the government isn't it? Do you allow unlicensed illegal streaming of movies for example?
    1
  24146.  @RayQiaoTW  Regarding the source, you specifically asked for "I challenge you to find a source not connected to the CCP that portrays what's happening to the Uighurs as anything but a human rights violation." and that is exactly what I did. You ask me to find a source not connected to the CCP and that's exactly what I did, (you never mentioned anything about its contents) According to your source, Tarim's 33-year-old sister, Zohra never said they were abusing her, she said she had lessons and a test that's all so how are the Uighurs treated unfairly? About the Social Credit System, I've read the rewards and penalties of the system of the link you sent, and nowhere does it mention that it "completely suppresses the opportunity for dissent." Where did you read that line? The Social Credit System rewards good behavior like doing good deeds and reporting crime to the authorities, while penalizing bad behavior like smoking in public, spitting in public, jaywalking, etc. Where does it say that it "completely suppresses the opportunity for dissent." like you claimed? You quoted a US law but obviously China is not the US, so why are you imposing US laws onto China? Who do you think you are? It's up to the USA if they want to disrespect their country that their forefathers worked hard to build, but don't expect China to follow in USA's degenerate path. I mean, look at how much China prospered till today? China has even sent people to space! In 2008, China conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut (Chinese astronaut) left the interior of Shenzhou-7 神舟七号 spacecraft and ventured into the vacuum of space. Video: China Shenzhou 7 Space Walk Live youtube.com/watch?v=gMxQEHfU6hM China is the 3rd country in the world to independently send people into space, besides USA and USSR. China is the 1st in Asia to achieve such a feat, and even Japan, Korea, India (and even Taiwan) have not had manned space missions of their own.
    1
  24147.  @MarkYeung1  From the way you describe your actions, that shopkeeper probably thought you were trying to haggle over the price, given that you just drop the belt and walk out of the store. Also, the shopkeeper saying 你哋啲香港人 ，唔買野又阻住我地時間 doesn't sound like it's Putonghua normally spoken by the people of Shenzhen, so it's possible the shopkeeper could have been a Hong Kong resident as well.
    1
  24148.  @MarkYeung1  To understand "colonial mindset" we need to understand that the British did not govern Hong Kong for the benefit of the local inhabitants. The colonizer not only colonize lands, but they also colonized the local people's minds. British culture was promoted over the local culture, and the British education system made sure to inculcate their values in the local children. Even after the colonizer left, the minds of the people may remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. That's why people like you continue to preach about "freedoms and democracy" when the matter of the fact is that before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy nor did the people of Hong Kong get to vote in elections while Hong Kong was still a British colony.
    1
  24149.  @MarkYeung1  Earlier you claim Taiwan embrace human rights and democracy, yet Taiwan is proving to be rather unwelcoming towards Hong Kongers activists wanting safe harbor. Taiwan is imposing additional requirements and making it difficult for Hong Kongers to secure residency in the island. But because of the "colonial mindset" you seem to think that a shared sense of freedom and democracy would automatically make Hong Kongers accepted in Taiwan, when this is not the case.
    1
  24150.  @MarkYeung1  Lai Ching-te only garnered 40% of the vote how is that "democracy" when he has less than 50% of the people's support?
    1
  24151.  @Elfan97-ec1uk  "Shenzhou. Taiwan is extremely cautious with HKers!" Exactly. Taiwan is proving to be rather unwelcoming to Hong Kongers seeking residency on the island. Back then, Taiwan was originally touted as a safe harbor for Hong Kongers, but it turns out that even with all that "democracy and freedoms", they aren't going to accept Hong Kongers just like that.
    1
  24152.  @biggpicture2930  "I don't think you even got the meaning right. It should mean adopting/copying the "superior" traits and custom of the master." The British drawn McMahon Line is adopted by India to be the border of India, even though the line was drawn according to British interests, not India's. The McMahon line ignores all pre-existing historical borders between China and India. After all, the British are not the ones neighboring China, it's India that's the neighbor of China. This means that India would have to bear the consequences for holding the McMahon line. You said: "Your mind is so twisted to argue because India wants to hold border at the Mchohan it has Colonial Mentality or that because India has colonial mentality, it will not want any other than the Mchohan line." More of your insults. Had India not have the colonial mentality, they would abandon the colonial era McMahon Line and consult with China to come to a mutually acceptable border by both countries, free from British influence. But India's mindset is that whatever new line they draw, they feel it will not be as good as the McMahon Line. This is a sign that India thinks the McMahon line as superior to any line drawn by India, and is therefore, a case for colonial mentality.
    1
  24153.  @biggpicture2930  "So india must presumably have Bad relationship because of "colonial mentality"" Colonial mentality has nothing to do with a country's relationship with others. Let's follow your definition (in that other thread). You wrote: @Shenzhou. A colonial mentality is the internalized attitude of ethnic or cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization, i.e. them being colonized by another group. It corresponds with the belief that the cultural values of the colonizer are inherently superior to one's own Nowhere in your definition does it mention a country's relationship with others. You said: "And you claim all UK colonies have that disease "colonial mentality" Not only former UK colonies like Hong Kong, Singapore, India, etc, but also former US colonies, like the Philippines for example. All former colonies have traces of colonial mentality present, but at varying levels. You said: "So Hong Kong will always be anti-china?" Hopefully not "always". It depends on how well the minds of the people can be decolonized. Many former colonies have undergone decolonization physical, but the "decolonization of the mind" also needs to take place.
    1
  24154.  @biggpicture2930  "How come you don't have tracker numbers added to your chat name?" I simply edited my channel handle to remove those numbers. After signing into your account in YouTube, type /handle at the end of the URL.
    1
  24155.  @biggpicture2930  "Shenzhou. You are even more special . No number to desecrate your chosen chat name!" YouTube started using channel names instead of profile names some time ago, I've noticed the change and I had the opportunity to edit my channel handle to remove the numbers. Unfortunately, Chinese characters aren't allowed in the channel handle, else I would have use them long ago.
    1
  24156.  @biggpicture2930  "China's ancient meritocracy is just as good as this- maybe even not as good!" Meritocracy existed in China since 600 BC. When's the earliest date for India having exams? The fact is that Chinese invented the concept of exams and they spread to the rest of the world. Wikipedia: Exam / History China: Standardized written examinations were first implemented in China. They were commonly known as the imperial examinations (keju).
    1
  24157.  @biggpicture2930  "Only a fool can declare everything a former colony of UK does is based on "Colonial mentality"," Not everything. But when it comes to the border dispute, I've already made the case already that India continues to adhere the border that the British drew for them, instead of negotiating a new border with China along pre-existing historical boundaries. Colonial mentality means that India sees the McMahon line drawn by Britain as superior to any line India (or China) can come up with. That's why the border issue remains unresolved till this day, because India won't let got its mentality regarding the border. You said: "You weren't aware that China studied Singapore's model" Nope, I've already explained that Singapore's meritocracy had its origins in sixth century BC ancient Chinese meritocracy. You're probably shocked that Singapore learned meritocracy from ancient China.
    1
  24158.  @biggpicture2930  You said: "How do you explain USA 's international relationship based on their "Colonial Mentality" towards its former master, UK?" As I've said earlier, colonial mentality has nothing to do with a country's relationship with others. Look up the definition of Colonial Mentality. You defined Colonial Mentality as the internalized attitude of ethnic or cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization, i.e. them being colonized by another group. It corresponds with the belief that the cultural values of the colonizer are inherently superior to one's own. But nowhere in your definition does it mention a country's relationship with others.
    1
  24159.  @biggpicture2930  "Shenzhou. "What makes you think that China had a good relation with India within that time frame? "- This what you wrote to me!" I wrote that because you wrote China had a "very good relationship" with India within that time. Yet you said it came from my mouth, not yours. @Shenzhou. Now you even said " Very good relationship". But it is from your mouth, not mine.
    1
  24160.  @biggpicture2930  "Shenzhou. Yes China's meritocracy is based on studying classical texts, but it was abandoned as it led to centuries of humiliation." Century of Humiliation was caused by Qing Dynasty lagging behind the technologically advanced Western colonial powers. During the Boxer Rebellion, eight nations (Germany, Japan, Russia, Britain, France, the United States, Italy, and Austria-Hungary) formed an alliance to invade China. China's territory was carved up like a pie and served to the 8 nations (as illustrated in that French Cartoon on Boxer Rebellion). In the end, China had to pay war reparations of 450,000,000 taels of fine silver to the victorious Allies. "So singapore will copy China's?" The fact remains that meritocracy originated in ancient China since 600 BC, and Singapore's meritocracy had its origins in ancient China.
    1
  24161.  @biggpicture2930  "You want to wiggle your way out ? Do it logically, and be on the subject." You yourself jump from topic to topic, from India's colonial mentality to Singapore's colonial mentality to suddenly United States and United Kingdom, and now you're accusing me of wiggling my way out? Which topic do you want to focus on in the first place?
    1
  24162.  @biggpicture2930  There you go again, jumping from random topic to topic. Meritocracy originated since 600 BC, while Qing Dynasty existed 1644–1911 AD How can meritocracy that originated over 2500 years ago, be responsible for the Century of Humiliation just 100-200 years ago during Qing Dynasty? China has had scientific and technological advancements even under Meritocratic system. Most famous are the Four Chinese Inventions (四大发明) which have gone on to revolutionize their respective sectors. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge much easier and more widespread. The Compass made navigation in bad weather conditions without Sun/stars, much easier. And Gunpowder had revolutionized the art of war. This already throws your theory that meritocracy being responsible for Century of Humiliation out the window. The fact remains that Singapore's meritocratic system has its origins in ancient Chinese meritocracy.
    1
  24163.  @biggpicture2930  Confucius is not opposed to science and technology. As a secular philosophy Confucianism has a natural affinity to science because it includes no superstitions and does not recognize supernatural forces. When asked, Kong Zi refused to speculate about gods, ghosts, and supernatural phenomena. His focus was entirely on this world and on things that can be known. The affinity between Confucianism and science and technology has been evidenced by historical figures such as Shen Kuo (1031–1095), who was a prominent scientist in research, a successful technocrat in civic service, and a committed Confucian in his family life.
    1
  24164.  @biggpicture2930  While Lee Kuan Yew was clearly enamored of Western culture, he still maintains a respect for indigenous culture, including his own Chinese roots. But even Lee Kuan Yew didn't have colonial mentality, it doesn't mean that the people of Singapore aren't affected by colonial mentality to a certain degree. Like I've said previously, colonial mentality exists at varying degrees among peoples in former colonies. Some are less affected by colonial mentality (i.e Malaysia) while others are more affected (i.e Philippines).
    1
  24165.  @biggpicture2930  "You pivoted from Singapore' s having Colonial mentality to now Singapore copying China." Did I ever mention that Singapore copied China? All I said was that Singapore's meritocracy had its origins in ancient China that's all. You said: "But your irrationality and arrogant show ." More of your insults. You keep on calling people who disagree with you as "irrational" but like in that other post, I've clearly stated that endless expansion is irrational, whereas you're the one advocating for India to expand beyond the McMahon Line. You said: "Nobody can declare that it is a fact , just by saying so." Then why have you been going around and declaring "Colonial Mentality is Rubbish" for at least six times already in that other comment thread. You think it's true fust by saying so?
    1
  24166.  @biggpicture2930  The Great Chinese Famine was caused by bad weather conditions like floods and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvests and mass starvation. For example, in 1958 the Yellow River flooded which coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops, and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. It was reported as the most severe flood since 1933. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather.
    1
  24167.  @biggpicture2930  Meritocracy originated since 600 BC, while Qing Dynasty existed 1644 AD –1911 AD. How can meritocracy that originated over 2500 years ago, be responsible for the Century of Humiliation just 100-200 years ago during Qing Dynasty? China has had scientific and technological advancements even under Meritocratic system. Most famous are the Four Chinese Inventions (四大发明) which have gone on to revolutionize their respective sectors. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge much easier and more widespread. The Compass made navigation in bad weather conditions without Sun/stars, much easier. And Gunpowder had revolutionized modern warfare. This already throws your theory that meritocracy being responsible for Century of Humiliation out the window.
    1
  24168. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24169. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24170. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  24171. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24172. +Nizam Massod You said Singapore should block the Straits of Singapore, world's busiest lane, but the reason its the most busiest lane, is because most of the shipment comes from China. And can Singapore navy even afford to impose a naval blockade on Straits of Singapore?
    1
  24173. Hong Kong was once global financial hub and busiest port city, but it has since fallen behind other mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Ningbo, and is facing competition from other rising port cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Dalian, Xiamen, etc. No wonder why Hong Kong people fear they'll be left behind. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage
    1
  24174. Carolyn Jackson Again, your data is about the number of cancer-related deaths, NOT the actual cancer rate. Since China much higher population than USA, then naturally there will be higher number of deaths, but that doesn't determine the cancer rate. Cancer Rate is when out of a certain number of people (say 100,000 people) a certain number of people (say 300 people) are diagnosed with cancer, thus providing a ratio of people being diagnosed with cancer. Why is it you people just see "number of cancer-related deaths" and just assume that China have higher cancer rate? If you have higher population.Even this laowhy guy just claim China have very very high cancer RATE at part 7:55 of the video without actually verifying actual facts first.
    1
  24175. Caryn Schwengel So if you can't prove anything, then you just claim the government isn't reporting the truth that's all? If Chinese people can survive despite our tap water being so bad, and the smoke and pollution. Even in USA, fatty foods, sugary drinks, fried chocolate bars, lack of exercise, also lead to increased cancer rates isn't it?
    1
  24176. Caryn Schwengel If you don't trust any sources at all, then how can you claim there is no way the cancer rate in China is much lower than the US?
    1
  24177. President Xi is achieving the Chinese Dream of rejuvenating of the Chinese Nation President Trump is leading astray the American Dream, where everyone has access to opportunities for success.
    1
  24178. It's sad that some Chinese continue to have an inferiority complex. Their minds have been "colonized" – been taught to view Anglo-Saxon culture and values as inherently superior to other cultures, including their own culture. Just as former colonies undergo decolonization, there also needs to be a "decolonization of the mind" for these people.
    1
  24179.  @HavokMakerX  _"神州 Shenzhou affair? O plesse then give us proof this was an affair and not sexual assault..." There's plenty of proof that this is just an affair, just search for Peng Shuai's post (or the translated version on Reddit) and she has had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several years in fact. But where are the allegations of sexual assault in her post? There's none, she was actually in a consenting affair with him. You said: "Im sure you are the judge investigating this allegation" Do you actually have proof that this was a sexual assault? Then without proof, how do you proceed on the basis of your case?
    1
  24180.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou So they would have starved anyway if not for the "great leap forward"?" In 1958, the Yellow River Flooded that coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. In July 1958, the peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 m3/s (790,000 cu ft/s) with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kg/m3 (57 lb/cu ft), 14× and 24× their mean annual values, respectively. The flood water level was so high that it rose up to the top of the levee in several places. From Wikipedia: This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages.It was reported as the most severe flood since 1933. Hostage diplomacy you mean when Canada detained Meng Wanzhou for 3 years even though she did not break any Canadian laws while in Canada? As for surveillance and facial recognition software, isn't that what the United States is employing against the Jan 6th Capitol Hill riots? And you still believe those organ harvesting rumours? Look, even Obama, Trump and now Biden hasn't said anything about organ harvesting to President Xi, then what makes you think the organ harvesting rumours are true?
    1
  24181.  @HiredGoonage  Investigators are using facial recognition to identify Capitol Hill rioters Video: Facial recognition to identify rioters youtu.be/MlLtp_9fVwU
    1
  24182.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou You still here wumao? We went over this stuff already (in the other comment section)." You were unable to refute my arguments in the other comment post and had lost the argument, that's why you resorted to hurling personal insults against me for my views, just because my views happen to differ from yours.
    1
  24183.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Hey also what do you think about this video which discredits all your points?" I did not click it, but it looks like it's a "flag of surrender" on your part.
    1
  24184.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Hey also what do you think about this video which discredits all your points?" I did not click it, but it looks like it's a "flag of surrender" on your part.
    1
  24185.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou You definitively clicked it lol." I didn't. But it looks like you're waving a flag of surrender because you're unable to refute my points.
    1
  24186.  @V01DIORE  Have you heard of The King's Avatar (全职高手)? Video: This Chinese Anime Looks Better than Japanese Anime? youtu.be/jA5GVsZSiu8
    1
  24187.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Oh but the video did, how do you know?" Because you clearly aren't refuting my points, so it's a flag of surrender on your part.
    1
  24188.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Oh but the video did, " You said the video did, then why don't you elaborate in detail here how does it refute my points? Then I take it you're unable to refute my points after all.
    1
  24189.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou I did in the other comment section." You didn't, you were unable to refute my points so you resort to hurling personal insults against me for my views, just because my views happen to differ from yours. So it's a flag of surrender on your part.
    1
  24190.  @HiredGoonage  "particularly so that they can weed out those ethnic Uyghurs for "cleansing" What "cleansing"? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 11 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 ……
    1
  24191.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Wa it deleted my comment about the anime (again)?... (Got rid of links to see if YouTube still dislikes it.)" Your comments have been deleted? So you're saying that censorship exists on Western platform like YouTube? Then what's all this talk about censorship in China when YouTube is censoring you by deleting your comments?
    1
  24192.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Also as for “hurling personal insults” I only called you a wumao because you refused the opportunity to prove otherwise," I clearly accepted your request to comment about President Xi Jinping, and I honored it. But when I made the request that you say something positive about the Communist Party of China, you refused and constantly accused me of being a wumao, even after I have acceded to your initial request, then why should I do it again? Knowing that you'll simply dismiss my statements?
    1
  24193.  @HiredGoonage  I implore people to consider this question: if there really was a genocide of Uighurs going on in Xinjiang, then where are the bodies? I implore people to come to Xinjiang and see Uighur life for themselves. Here's a short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA
    1
  24194.  @HiredGoonage  You claimed that there's a genocide going on with the Uighurs, this is a serious accusation but where's the evidence? Where are the bodies that would result from such a genocide? I've shown that the Uighur population in China actually tripled in size from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. Even the International Criminal Court said that there was insufficient evidence of ongoing genocide in Xinjiang. According to The Guardian The International Criminal Court (ICC) has asked for more evidence before it will be willing to open an investigation into claims of genocide against Uighur people by China, but has said it will keep the file open for such further evidence to be submitted. The expected ICC decision, already relayed to lawyers, is that there is still insufficient evidence to warrant opening a full-scale investigation.
    1
  24195.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou It doesn’t like links too much for obvious reasons, plus it’s a tech platform not a form of government." Likewise, Chinese platforms like Weibo, WeChat, Youku, Zhihu etc are a tech platform not a form of government, so what's your point then? So you agree that censorship does exist on Western platform like YouTube?
    1
  24196.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Here this is what was required." That's not what you requested initially, you said (and I quote your words): "神州 Shenzhou To prove you are not a wumao tell me an insulting thing about Xi’s appearance. For me I can say Boris Johnson and Donald Trump look like failed orangutans. Now give me one back about yours else it’s quite certain." And I did honor your request when I said: "Well, personally I think it would be better for our leader's personal health if he watches his weight better. Now that I've said that, could you say something positive about the Communist Party of China? It's only fair that you return the gesture." So I have redeemed myself through doing as your asked, but you didn't honor my request to say something positive about the CPC.
    1
  24197.  @V01DIORE  You said: "Once again I did compliment the Chinese Communist Party I said something along the lines of “I liked the one child policy of the Chinese Communist Party, it was good, though it could of been one better.”" That's NOT what you said. You said: "...though if you are expecting me to compliment the communist party you might as well be asking me to compliment hitler. Hmmmm I liked the idea of a one child policy though could of been better if they made it none for reasons of sparing the posterity."_ But nowhere in your comment did you even the Communist Party of China.
    1
  24198.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Use common sense if you have any about why things may be censored on YouTube." Could it be that YouTube doesn't want you to know about what the real China is like? And regardless of how you phrased it, censorship is censorship after all, I'm merely pointing out the fact that censorship exists on Western platform like YouTube that's all.
    1
  24199. ​ @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Read the rest that you quoted of." I've also noticed that in your initial request, you made insults to the appearance of British PM Johnson and the former U.S President Trump, so if you're an American, you're merely insulting the UK leader and your former leader that's all, you didn't really say anything insulting towards the current U.S President Joe Biden.
    1
  24200.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou I rephrased it after a later response because you wanted it to include explicitly about the Chinese communist party even though it was already inferred" But that's not what you said initially, you said: "...though if you are expecting me to compliment the communist party you might as well be asking me to compliment hitler. Hmmmm I liked the idea of a one child policy though could of been better if they made it none for reasons of sparing the posterity." so you did not include the Communist Party of China in your compliment. And since I have already answered your initial request, I have clearly redeemed myself, but you're still calling me wumao even after I have agreed to honor your request. And now it appears you're just shifting the goalpost after I have answered you, then why should I continue to answer your requests, when you can just move the goalpost like that?
    1
  24201.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou It censored it probably because the name is Link Click in the link which sounds like a scam phishing link or something so bot deleted it" Censorship is censorship, I don't understand why you reacted such when I bring up the simple fact that censorship exists on Western platform like YouTube. In China, at least the Chinese government controls the Chinese companies for China's benefit, whereas in the USA, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    1
  24202.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou I’m not American." So since apparently you're not American, then what's the point of you insulting British PM Johnson or the former U.S president Trump or even the current U.S President Biden at? There's no stakes involved for you if you criticize other countries leaders other than your own country's leader, then why should I continue to honor your 2nd request (even after I honored your 1st request) on making such a remark about President Xi, whereas you offered none for your own country's leader? Already, the whole premise of your "deal" is already lopsided in favor of yourself, since you can insult British and American politicians even though your not American, then I see no need to continue this pointless exchange of insults with you, when you didn't even insult your own country's leader.
    1
  24203.  @V01DIORE  "You’re still a certain wumao if you can’t comply with the rest of what you quoted of though, you keep trying to feign ignorance that the rest even exists." I've already honored your 1st request and redeemed myself. You on the other hand, aren't even American yourself, and there's clearly no stakes for you to criticise British PM Johnson, the former U.S President Trump, and the current President Biden, when you're not American. And after I answered your 1st request, you just shift the goalpost because you refuse to honor your end of the bargain, and that's why you continue calling me wumao even after I've proven myself once.
    1
  24204.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Hey also do you know what the guy is saying near the end of the video?" Why don't you go learn the Chinese language then if you want to find out? Chinese characters constituted among the world's oldest continuously used system of writing, having been used since 1200 BCE and today, Mandarin Chinese is the most spoken language in the world by number of speakers. Whereas other ancient scripts like Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia), Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered "dead language" today, since they are no longer evolving with the times, and no new words being added into their vocabulary.
    1
  24205.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou I don't think British PM Johnson is such in America," But you've admitted that you're not American, then what's the point of you insulting British PM Johnson or former US President Trump or US President Biden? You haven't demonstrated in any form that you insulted your own country's leaders, yet I have already honored your 1st request and I did so for mine, so I have clearly redeemed myself. Yet you continue to label me wumao and shifted the goalpost so why should I honor your 2nd request when you'll only shift the goal again?
    1
  24206.  @V01DIORE  No, I have honored your earlier request, even you acknowledged my answer, yet you're not American, but you've shown no proof that you've insulted your country's leader, you've insulted British PM Johnson, Donald Trump and President Biden that's all. And I have redeemed myself by answering your 1st request, but you shifted the goal post so I see no need to answer your 2nd request, given that I have redeemed myself through the earlier request.
    1
  24207.  @V01DIORE  Why don't you learn Mandarin Chinese since you want to know what he said? Mandarin Chinese is the world's most spoken language by number of speakers and given that America is in decline and China is rising, it's a good investment for people to learn Mandarin Chinese as it may come in useful in the future.
    1
  24208.  @HiredGoonage  "神州 Shenzhou where's the evidence he says, lol." Where are the bodies if there's an ongoing genocide of Uighurs like you claimed? Why is it that the population of Uighurs in China tripled in size from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020?
    1
  24209.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou I acknowledged it" So since you have acknowledged my response to your request, that means I have redeemed myself, yet you're now seemingly shifting the goalpost after I have scored the goal? I have proven myself and thus I see no further need to answer any more of your requests.
    1
  24210.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Yeah I bet China would want people to think that." Here's a list of the The 10 Most Spoken Languages In The World according to Babbel Magazine Top 10 Languages By Number Of Native Speakers 1. Chinese — 1.3 Billion 2. Spanish — 471 Million 3. English — 370 Million 5. Arabic — 315 Million 6. Portuguese — 232 Million 7. Bengali — 229 Million 8. Russian — 154 Million 9. Japanese — 126 Million 10. Lahnda (Western Punjabi) — 118 Million ... Source: Babbel: The 10 Most Spoken Languages In The World And again, you're the one who wanted to understand what that Chinese person was saying so why don't you pick up the language then?
    1
  24211.  @V01DIORE  You said: "I’m British course I have." So did you vote for Boris Johnson or against him? What were the poll results of his election? Did he win by a landslide or just barely made the majority vote?
    1
  24212.  @V01DIORE  You said: "nevertheless anyone in any western democracy can insult their leaders freely however they wish" I remember watching Canadian PM Trudeau hesitating for more than 20 seconds, when asked about then U.S President Trump. Video: Trudeau Pauses For More Than 20 Seconds When Asked About Trump, U.S. Protests | NBC News NOW youtu.be/gJ700Ws3iYU That doesn't look like someone who's free to say what he feels about another country's leader, that's the amount of control the United States has over it's so-called "allies" like Canada, Britain, Australia, and so on.
    1
  24213.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou I acknowledged it" You acknowledged it nevertheless, therefore I have proven my case and I see no further need to reply to the goalpost that you shifted, since I have already scored the goal.
    1
  24214.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Like I want to put the effort into learning a whole language for meme video." It's apparently your loss then, you don't get to know what that Chinese guy said on that video. Many Americans, Canadians, Australians and British only seem to know a single language English. And it's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. With the rise of China, having the ability to speak and understand Mandarin Chinese will prove to be an asset to many seeking to work with China.
    1
  24215. ​ @V01DIORE  It certainly pays to learn another language besides the one you currently know. China is investing in Artificial Intelligence, here's a robot Xiaoai (小艾) encouraging people in China to wear masks in public. Video:youtu.be/LwT7dXG4Ilg
    1
  24216.  @V01DIORE  "Boris even held a bl**dy Christmas party at number 10, a supposed political meeting, while claiming restrictions to be followed. Some made to resigned over that, they were caught joking about it." Did you just admit that people had to resign because they were caught joking over an event that Boris Johnson held? It sounds like there is certainly some level of control exerted by the British government over what is appropriate for people to joke about, it seems.
    1
  24217.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Canada the US and same for the UK are all separate countries, we just share a similar culture." Sharing a similar Western culture of "freedom of speech" and "criticizing leaders" right? Then why is it Canadian PM Trudeau felt like someone is controlling him when he commented on then U.S President Trump? It's apparent that the U.S enjoys a superior status over its so-called allies like UK, Canada, Australia, etc. "It’d be like saying a South Korean politician hesitated on commenting about a Japanese one, what’s the inference?" Korean and Japanese culture is different, and not to mention there is some animosity between South Korea over Japanese invasion and occupation of Korea, the two countries aren't on the friendliest of terms. "We are allies of the five eyes but that doesn’t mean we agree on everything." The only thing the Five Eyes seem to agree on (except New Zealand) is to contain the rise of China. The Five Eyes was formed by USA in order to pit the other four countries against China to serve the U.S interests.
    1
  24218.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou No they were caught joking about the attending the event like it was banter, which suggests it was less of a political meeting and more of a party." And they were forced to resign over that? Then isn't that really against the Western values of "freedom of speech" and "criticising leaders"? "No way the national news of China would ever report a controversy of the government like this" Honestly speaking, Chinese news doesn't really care about what happens inside UK's domestic issues, it's your own countries internal affairs after all. Yet why is it Western countries are interested in China's internal affairs in Xinjiang, Hong Kong, Taiwan, when it doesn't really concern you at all?
    1
  24219.  @V01DIORE  About "criticizing leaders", I remember there was one U.S Marine Corps lieutenant colonel, Stuart Scheller, who was fired from his post just for demanding accountability from his superiors for their mishandling of the U.S withdrawal from Afghanistan, through posting a video. Here's Stuart Scheller's video:youtu.be/TOrjiUnsaiw
    1
  24220.  @V01DIORE  "Trudeau likely could have insulted and condemned trump but that wouldn’t be good for relations between countries." Yet Canada choose to detain Meng Wanzhou even though the Huawei CFO did not break any Canadian laws while in Canada, and this caused deterioration of Canada-China relations. "The Five Eyes was likely for Russia initially, it’s just China has been proven more trouble then otherwise as it’s undiplomatic and frankly unethical in it’s holistic approach, lately gathering disdain from the international community." So what threat does Russia even pose to Canada, Australia and New Zealand, if the Five Eyes were created in response to Russia? As for China, clearly America is in decline and China is rising, so the U.S is influencing the other four countries to contain China's rise, in order to serve U.S interests, not for your countries interests. You claim China is undiplomatic and unethical, but China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Yet you as British, don't realize the real threat to global peace and stability here?
    1
  24221.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou They resigned themselves, though if they stayed in the position they would have been heavily criticised so long as they maintained it. It is exactly because free speech that they had to resign," That's not making sense. If they supposedly have the "freedom of speech" to joke about attending the event, then why should they have been forced to resign because of a joke they made? They should have been able to joke about without being silenced for criticizing the government and remain in their post without being forced to resign.
    1
  24222.  @V01DIORE  U.S Marine Corps lieutenant colonel, Stuart Scheller, was not the only one punished for speaking up. Even some time ago, a U.S Aircraft Carrier Captain, Brett Crozier was fired from his post just for sounding the alarm of Covid-19 on the USS Theodore Roosevelt Video: Families, Sailors, Former Classmates Show Support For Fired Aircraft Carrier Captain youtu.be/iGzzzfU6WIE
    1
  24223.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Detained for espionage likely, it wasn’t as if she was put in a prison either I think it was house arrest." Espionage of what, you tell me? Why would the Huawei CEO put his daughter Meng Wanzhou in the dangerous position of being a spy for what? There was clearly no case again Meng, she pleaded not guilty and Washington just dropped the charges eventually, because it was a hoax and an unlawful detention without any basis. "Hauwai has been quite suspicious" Suspicious of what? Even German IT Watchdog has expressed scepticism about calls for a boycott of Chinese telecoms giant Huawei, saying it has seen no evidence the firm could use its equipment to spy for Beijing. “For such serious decisions like a ban, you need proof,” the head of Germany's Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Arne Schönbohm, told Spiegel, adding that his agency had no such evidence.
    1
  24224.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou That is quite worrying," Not only are U.S military personnel being fired from their posts for speaking out, even ordinary American citizens with political grievances brought their issues to U.S Congress on Capitol Hill on Jan 6th, but one woman was shot dead and several Americans arrested just for airing their political grievances with the government. Video: Inside the Capitol Hill Riots youtu.be/lfP_5L8epow
    1
  24225.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou It is because free speech that the politicians are criticised and cannot maintain their positions when proved hypocritical to policy they are supposed to uphold." Upholding the policy of free speech right? Then why can't politicians make jokes about attending a political meeting? Instead they are forced to resign because of words that they spoke? This is clearly against the policy of free speech isn't it, that politicians aren't allowed to even joke about things?
    1
  24226.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Ehh hard to give the title spy, or maybe my ideas of spy are just more grandiose, but helping to share information directly to and for the CCP’s benefit is not very well for either country. Hard to prove when they destroy documentation like the paperwork at the Chinese embassy." What has the Chinese embassy even got to do with "allegations of spying" by Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou? I mean Meng Wanzhou wasn't even in America then how is she a spy? Why would the Huawei CEO make his own daughter a spy? You said she was detained for espionage likely, but where are the charges of espionage then brought against her? Since there was no charges, then why was Meng detained for nearly 3 years (since December 2018) without proof?
    1
  24227.  @V01DIORE  You said: "They seem much too closely linked with a foreign and conflicting government who can simply order the corporation to hand over information without trace" Huawei is 100% employee owned by 96,000 current and former staff, leaving exactly 0% in the hands of the Chinese government. Yes Huawei does get some government subsidies for R&D, but it's negliable compared to Huawei's revenue from sales. Huawei does receive tax breaks for R&D spending, but it's comparable to most companies in the U.S and even less than some famous ones like GM, Intel, Pfizer, Boeing, etc. Video: Fact: Huawei isn't built on Chinese state funding youtu.be/HAffWwL1E-Q Do you actually have proof that Huawei is too closely linked with the Chinese government?
    1
  24228.  @V01DIORE  Since you want to bring up foreign government "espionage" and "spying", didn't Edward Snowden revealed that the U.S government spies on it's allies like Canada, Australia, Germany and even on their own U.S citizens, monitoring citizens' conversations for keywords relating to terrorism? Video: "You're Being Watched": Edward Snowden Emerges as Source Behind Explosive Revelations of NSA Spying youtu.be/wB4Gn0u4DSE For all your talk about surveillance, here we have evidence of U.S government surveillance, yet when it comes to Huawei, you just assume it's espionage and linked to a foreign government without proof?
    1
  24229.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Whether owned or not officially listed of the CCP their dealings are heavily suspected and quite hard to deal with without banning them entirely." Suspected based off what? I've already shown that Huawei is 100% employee-owned, leaving 0% in the hands of the Chinese government, then what excuse does the USA have for banning Huawei? It's more likely because Huawei has surpassed Apple as the world's 2nd largest smartphone maker and that's why the USA ban Huawei in order to strike an economic blow against China and wound Chinese national pride. Video: Huawei overtakes Apple to become world's No. 2 smartphone seller youtu.be/6yKcTj05EiI
    1
  24230.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Ah some Chinese embassy burning documents when suspected seen the smoke itself, can’t remember which or where." Again, what has Chinese embassy allegedly "burning documents" even got to do with allegations of Huawei spying? You claim smoke but can't remember which or where, then how reliable is your accusations in the first place without proof? And Meng Wanzhou is the Huawei CEO's daughter, why would he send her to "spy" on the US, when Meng Wanzhou wasn't even on U.S soil, she was in Canada?
    1
  24231.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou Upholding covid restrictions watch the video she herself admitted it as to why she was resigning. As to their jokes it inferred it wasn’t a political meeting but more of a party, are you reading properly I said that before at least twice" So she resigned because of a joke? Then there's clearly no freedom of speech if a politician can't even joke about "going to a party" so your own country does it yet you want to complain about China? And I've already shown that former U.S Navy Captain, Brett Crozier was fired from his post for sounding the alarm of Covid-19 on the USS Theodore Roosevelt and U.S Marine Corps lieutenant colonel, Stuart Scheller was fired from his post for demanding accountability about U.S withdrawal from Afghanistan. During U.S withdrawal from Afghanistan, President Biden didn't even care about U.S allies troops (including the UK) stationed in Kabul, he just unilaterally pull the plug without bothering to consult U.S Allies even Boris Johnson was caught off-guard. Video: Afghanistan: Johnson to urge Biden to delay withdrawal youtu.be/jctIh1tdCCo But the USA doesn't care about it's allies, they've put American interests over that of it's allies.
    1
  24232.  @V01DIORE  "神州 Shenzhou I don’t see anything of the latter in the source." Didn't you hear the Capitol Hill's protestors demands? They claim that the U.S election was stolen from them (whether real or imagined), and they were airing their political grievances on Capitol Hill, yet one woman was shot and several Americans are being arrested for airing their political grievances, yet you still claim this is "freedom of speech" and the ability to "criticize leaders"?
    1
  24233.  @V01DIORE  "Cold War really started it. To be expected spies about but not a whole telecom company." The Cold War is over, yet the U.S clearly spies on allies, even German Chancellor Merkel had her conversations monitored, yet you're giving excuses for the USA (even though you're British). Don't you see the irony of you accusing Huawei of espionage (without proof) yet we have evidence that the U.S government engages on spying activities on it's allies? Video: Merkel: U.S. spying on friends is 'not acceptable' youtu.be/G_qGrNKbGdU
    1
  24234.  @ajcso7844  "神州 Shenzhou Very sus. You write like I do in Spanish. English must not be your first language. You must be a CCP official." Well, certainly my English proficiency isn't on par with that of a native English speaker, but how does that line of reasoning even make sense at all? Just because English isn't my first language somehow makes me a communist party official? Why do you seemingly resort to hurling ad hominen attacks against me (like criticising my English proficiency) instead of attacking my points directly?
    1
  24235.  @ajcso7844  "神州 Shenzhou No your English is fine. I'm saying that you are writing in a way a normal person does not. Your grammar is better then mine." And how exactly does a normal person write? I was taught English by my teacher and had the opportunity to study abroad, and I was appalled at the sheer volume of anti-China propaganda permeating Western discourse. Whenever I try to bring up China's positive achievements under the government, many Westerners (but not all) just laughed at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill (like what you're doing right now). Some even took it a step further and told me to "Go back to China if you like it there!". And this coming from people who probably never actually set foot in China and seen what life is like here for themselves, yet they presume to know everything about China, even more than me. "Also I can't really attack your points because the only evidence I can find is from the news and you do not trust that." It's the same why how we have footage and photos of Peng Shuai appearing in public, such as attending dinners and award ceremonies for youth athletes, yet many Westerners still question Peng Shuai being safe. She's trying to keep a low profile after her previous affair with a much older man has been exposed, and she even expressed her desire for personal privacy during a video call with IOC, yet the WTA is behaving kinda like the paparazzi in trying to pry into her private affairs.
    1
  24236.  @ajcso7844  "I meant the problem with your English is that it is too good. A lot of people who learned English in school don't write in the same way as people a native speaker." What's wrong with having good English proficiency? Many times, I find that misunderstanding arises between China and the United States (and the West) because China just lacks good PR and good English speakers. And obviously, speaking good English and writing good English are different matters. But I'm confused, earlier you seemingly attacked my English proficiency, yet now you're seemingly praising my English, then what is the reason for this changing view? Also, I still fail to see your line of reasoning on how my English proficiency automatically leads to me be a communist party official as you said.
    1
  24237.  @ajcso7844  "My problem with the CCP is how is crushes criticism of its government and how they treat the Uygher population." How does China treat the Uighur population? Ethnic minorities in China aren't subject to the One-Child Policy (unlike Han) so the Uighurs can have as many kids as they want. According to China Consensus, the population of Uighurs in China actually tripled in size from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953-2020 according to China population consensus 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  24238.  @ajcso7844  "神州 Shenzhou There is nothing wrong with it I just could tell by the way you wrote that English is your second language." Obviously, not everyone on the Internet speaks English as a first language. The problem arises when people discriminate against others of whom English is not their first language. You said: "Also I accused you as a part official as a joke because you seem to be Chinese and supporting the CCP." Is there a problem with me being Chinese and supporting the Communist Party of China? A recent long-term study by Harvard University and Ash Centre has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the CPC. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. Does this mean that Chinese people who support the CPC are all communist party officials?
    1
  24239.  @ajcso7844  You said: "My problem is the mass internment of the population." The Uighurs born in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth (it says so on their Resident ID card) and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (national language of China) Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China. Just like for example, the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth (it says so on their ID) and they learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America. The Uighurs in Xinjiang are in boarding schools and they can take the weekends off to go home and be with their families. The schools even charter buses to take trainees home during Saturdays and Sundays. https://youtu.be/OrfBIH8d9Wc?t=182 Which internment camp would allow their inmates to go home during the weekends?
    1
  24240.  @ajcso7844  "神州 Shenzhou If the majority of the country supports the government then I can not not criticise the way they rule. But honestly I havr doubts about that poll." China is certainly not perfect, but for many Chinese people, life is generally improving every day. Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past. Fast forward to today and China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. As long as the government is able to deliver economic growth, is it really so inconceivable that majority of the Chinese interviewed in the Harvard/Ash Centre survey support the Chinese government? "Ima also add I thought YouTube was banned in China." Why do you believe YouTube is banned in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    1
  24241.  @ajcso7844  "神州 Shenzhou Some of those people look too old to be going to school." Because in the past before the re-educational program was initiated, many Uighur families refused to send their kids to school, instead their kids just stay home and read the Koran (Islam holy book) all day. Once the kids become old enough, they help their parents sell kebabs on the roadside. Many of such people grew angry and dissatisfied, some became radicalised and joined the terrorist groups in wreaking havoc in Xinjiang. Examples of terrorist acts in Xinjiang include: -1992 Urumqi bombings -1997 Urumqi bus bombings -2008 Kashgar attack -July 2009 Urumqi riots -2010 Aksu bombing -2011 Hotan attack -April 2014 Urumqi attack -May 2014 Urumqi attack ... But after the government implemented the re-education program, there have been no terrorist attacks in Xinjiang ever since. Because those older Uighur students didn't attend school so now they are receiving a proper Chinese education that they missed out on initially.
    1
  24242.  @ajcso7844  "Also ima ask why are all the homes situated into a certain area?" Probably because it's located closer to the Uighur trainees home villages (although it can still be quite far). Xinjiang is China's largest province and the trainees home village might be located quite far away. https://youtu.be/XRorvkxIDPg Obviously, the Eastern coastal cities of China (i.e Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou) have been well-developed due their access to the sea and trade, whereas the Western provinces of China are poorer. So the Chinese government is trying to rectify the problem by building a high speed railway connecting the wealthier Eastern cities to the impoverished Western regions to share the prosperity.
    1
  24243.  @ajcso7844  "神州 Shenzhou I know its blocked by the fire wall" Then YouTube is merely blocked, not banned. There are actually many foreign companies that come to China and set up shop here, and they require access to Western social media like Facebook and YouTube, so the government issues VPN licenses to these companies. As long as you use government-approved VPN providers, nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China.
    1
  24244.  @ajcso7844  "神州 Shenzhou It is forced though and they probably do not have religious freedom" About religious freedom, China has built at least 35,000 mosques, more than France's 2,300, Americans 2,106 and Great Britain's 1,600. Even on the per capita basis, Chinese Muslims still have more than triple the amount of mosques their Western peers have. https://youtu.be/U3YBomwuB10?t=81
    1
  24245.  @ajcso7844  I've shown people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  24246. Be careful Brian, there are a number of people whom I follow on YouTube, that have started to refrain from talking about the events in Butcha in a manner that opposes the official Western narrative and have started self-censoring for fear of having their YT accounts deleted. I know we want to get down to the bottom of this matter, but it appears YT is targeting those who take a different view.
    1
  24247. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24248. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24249. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  24250. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24251. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24252. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  24253.  @PomegranateChocolate  Why should China reunite under the banner of the Republic of China? Why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 even lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist KMT had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet the KMT still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communists peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, as well as cement the communists' right to rule China.
    1
  24254.  @PomegranateChocolate  There was hyperinflation during KMT's rule of Republic of China (1912-1949) because of KMT corruption. You said the communists colluded with the Soviet Union, but USA was sending military aid to KMT, who had pocketed some 750,000,000 dollars worth of U.S military aid, so much that even U.S President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves".
    1
  24255.  @PomegranateChocolate  "神州 Shenzhou The reason China should reunite under the banner of the Republic of China is that only this way can China have a chance to recover its land back from Russia, and India." But history has shown that under the KMT, the ROC failed to recover its lands, so what makes you claim the mainland reuniting under ROC banner is the only such chance? In fact, the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 has recovered more of China's historical territory than the Republic of China 🇹🇼 ever did, just look at the map today
    1
  24256.  @PomegranateChocolate  "神州 Shenzhou The reason China should reunite under the banner of the Republic of China is that only this way can China have a chance to recover its land back from Russia, and India." But history has shown that under the KMT, the ROC failed to recover its lands, so what makes you claim the mainland reuniting under ROC banner is the only such chance?
    1
  24257.  @PomegranateChocolate  You said: "This is the real reason KMT loses the civil war because it lost a lot of troops during the Sino-Japanese war while the CCP became stronger and stronger during the same time." Let's count each side's troop strength after WWII. When Imperial Japan surrendered in 1945, the KMT had a strength of -2 million (regular) -2.3 million (militia) (June 1946) ... Whereas the communists had a strength of -1.2 million (regular) -2.6 million (militia) (July 1945) ... Source: Wikipedia: Chinese Civil War So looking at the above figures, after WWII, the total KMT troops still outnumbered the communist troops. Yet despite this numerical superiority, the KMT still lost the mainland to the communists and had to flee to Taiwan? And mind you, this was after the Japanese surrendered, so there was no more fighting the Japanese after 1945.
    1
  24258.  @PomegranateChocolate  Taken from an article: 11 Things You Should Know About Chiang Kai-shek (By the Culture Trip): Chiang’s efforts against the Japanese gained him some influential friends. And although the Communist General Mao was responsible for much of the damage inflicted upon the Japanese, it was Chiang who got the credit mainly from Britain and the US.
    1
  24259.  @jordandthornburg  "神州 Shenzhou interesting standard there. If you lose a war you have no moral right to rule a place." The reality is that the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lost the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan, so doesn't that imply that the majority in the mainland choose to support the communists over the KMT? How do you justify Taiwan having the moral right to rule all of mainland China then?
    1
  24260. ​ @PomegranateChocolate  A country's treasury principally refers to a country's gold reserves, not cultural artifacts, why are you conflating the two together? In 1948, after realizing that KMT was losing against the communists, Chiang kai-shek began transferring the mainland's gold reserves from Shanghai to Taipei. Estimates of how much was moved differ between sources, ranging from between 3 million – 5 million taels (113.6 tons – 115.2 tons). In The Archives of Gold published in 2010, Dr Wu Sing-yung, outlines how his father (head of finance for the KMT government) helped to mastermind the operation that saw over 4 million taels of gold be moved from Shanghai to Taiwan. One tael is 37.2 grams. ... Source: Mining: How one man took China’s gold
    1
  24261.  @jordandthornburg  "神州 Shenzhou when did the communists rule over Taiwan?" So why can't Taiwan change their constitution and formally declare independence? Why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations as an independent country? Is there something that's stopping Taiwan from joining the UN like an independent country can? (Also, I take it that you have at least acknowledge the communists right to rule over mainland China at least..)
    1
  24262.  @jordandthornburg  So you're admitting that Taiwan cannot amend their constitution and declare formal independence, because of the Communist Party of China? Then you've just proven that the CPC exerts control over Taiwan, such the latter can't even formally declare independence nor join the UN like an independent country can.
    1
  24263.  @jordandthornburg  You said: "It's bad as communism is a garbage ideology." Take Russia for example: Before 1917, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe at that time, dominated by peasants, whose traditional household economies were extremely inefficient compared to agriculture in Western Europe or the United States. Only about 15% of the population lived in towns, and fewer than 10% worked in industry, and Russia was technologically backward compared to Western Europe and USA. Yet after the 1917 Communist Revolution, the new Soviet Union transformed to become arguably the strongest country in Europe at that time, both economically as well as militarily (that's why NATO was formed in response to Soviet's rising military might. The Soviet Union also made numerous technological advancements during its heyday and was the world's 2nd largest economy from 1960-1985 according to Wikipedia: List of countries by largest historical GDP. Such an ideology that transformed arguably Europe's poorest country into its strongest, and you're just labelling it as garbage?
    1
  24264.  @jordandthornburg  You've already admitted that Taiwan cannot join the UN like an independent country can, because of the Communist Party of China, so isn't that CPC's exerting control over Taiwan? Even in the Olympics, athletes from Taiwan can only compete under the name "Chinese Taipei" so isn't this evidence of CPC's control over the island?
    1
  24265.  @jordandthornburg  "神州 Shenzhou how do they exert control? In what way is that?" Taiwan cannot join the UN like an independent country can, because of the CPC, so isn't that CPC's exerting control over Taiwan? Even in the Olympics, athletes from Taiwan can only compete under the name " Chinese Taipei" so isn't that CPC exerting control over the island here?
    1
  24266.  @jordandthornburg  "神州 Shenzhou I’m not responding to you nonsense about communism." Communist ideology literally transformed Russia from being arguably Europe's poorest country into it's strongest as the Soviet Union, yet you're calling it a garbage ideology? Because you can't refute my point? And I've long answered your question that the CPC exerts a level of control over Taiwan such that the latter cannot formally declare independence nor can Taiwan join the UN like an independent country can. What more needs to be said?
    1
  24267.  @PomegranateChocolate  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwan is the Republic of China that is the legitimate government of China." But clearly, the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lost the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan, so doesn't this demonstrate KMT's gross incompetence in their inability to unify China, while at the same time cementing the communists right to rule China. "What's wrong with taking the gold and transfer it to a safe place (Taiwan) then leaving it to the Communist?" The problem is that you tried to mix up a country's treasury (i.e gold reserves) with cultural artifacts, as though you don't even know the difference. Also, since you admit that Chiang transferred mainland gold reserves from Shanghai to Taipei, that means that mainland China became poorer with the lost of our gold reserves, meanwhile Taipei had an injection of gold to kickstart it's economy.
    1
  24268.  @jordandthornburg  You literally cannot establish how such an ideology like communism is garbage when it transformed what was arguably Europe's poorest country into it's strongest as the Soviet Union. And I've long answered your question (in which you agreed) that the CPC exerts a level of control over Taiwan's inablity to formally declare independence, nor join the UN like an independent country can, why do you keep on asking questions that have already been answered? The same case with athletes from Taiwan having to compete under the name "Chinese Taipei" at the Olympics.
    1
  24269.  @jordandthornburg  "神州 Shenzhou I literally can. I choose not to because it’s late Sunday night and I don’t have any interest." So it appears that you've chosen to give up, just citing vague "obvious counter arguments" when and are unable to refute my point about how such an ideology like communism transformed arguably Europe's poorest country into it's strongest as the Soviet Union. I also find it ironic that here you are claiming you have no interest, yet you're chastising me for not doing my due diligence on researching the ideology? I've already presented my findings above, to which you've been unable to refute.
    1
  24270.  @jordandthornburg  You're the one repeatedly asking a question that I've long answered above, that the CPC exerts a level of control over Taiwan being unable to formally declare independence nor able to join the UN like an independent country can, how long are you going to continue going in circles? And again, it's ironic that you're unable to refute my point about communist ideology, yet you continually demand answers out of me to a question I've already answered.
    1
  24271.  @aksbeixhev  "神州 Shenzhou China has prevented Taiwan from being a member in a lot of organisations like the UN, WHO and many more." Congratulations, you've just proven that mainland China actually has control over Taiwan, and that Taiwan is not an independent country. Even Taiwan's constitution says that Taiwan is part of China and since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  24272.  @aksbeixhev  "神州 Shenzhou China has prevented Taiwan from being a member in a lot of organisations like the UN, WHO and many more." Congratulations, you've just proven that mainland China actually has control over Taiwan, and that Taiwan is not an independent country.
    1
  24273.  @aksbeixhev  "神州 Shenzhou China has prevented Taiwan from being a member in a lot of organisations like the UN, WHO and many more." So you've just proven that Taiwan isn't an independent country, and that mainland China exerts a level of control over Taiwan.
    1
  24274. +Tri Poloski You said she appreciates Chinese culture? In traditional Chinese culture, women aren't given priority to go to school, work, own a business, etc, so what logic are you trying to apply here? Are you even familiar with traditional Chinese culture at all, to claim that the traditional mindset is killing the culture?
    1
  24275. Why can't China provide subsidies to our local companies to give them an edge over the competition? New, fledgling, Chinese companies would surely perished if exposed directly to global competition, so the government provides a home advantage to local companies to allow them to compete with foreign competition.
    1
  24276. People shouldn't assume that Kim Jung Un will be like previous North Korean leader (his father Kim Jung il) I mean, who can truly predict whether the talks will be more fruitful this time for all parties, when the talks haven't even taken place yet?
    1
  24277. During 19th century, the British wanted Chinese luxury products, like silk, porcelain and especially tea, but China didn't want do business with them, so the British waged two bloody wars with China (which both we lost) and force Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs, to spread the addiction throughout China, and Chinese territories like Hong Kong and Macau were taken from us. Today, China has world's largest land army PLA, to defend our lands from invaders, like British and Japan. A big country with small army will be vulnerable to invasion, whereas a country with strong army will deter potential invaders from eyeing its territories.
    1
  24278. Indian Air Force lost half of its MiG fighter jets in deadly crashes. which have led to the deaths of 171 pilots, 39 civilians and 8 persons from other services, over the last 40 years.. Because of this, the MiG is often nicknamed "Flying Coffins". Here is a list of known MiG crashes in IAF. Jul 6, 2017: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed in Jodhpur’s Balesar. Sep 10, 2016: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed in Barmer district of Rajasthan Jun 13, 2016: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed in Jodhpur, Rajasthan. Aug 24, 2015: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed near a village in Budgam district. May 8, 2015: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed in West Bengal’s Tantipara area. Jan 31, 2015: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed west of Jamnagar city.. May 27, 2014: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed in Bijbehara area of Anantnag district in Kashmir. Nov 8, 2013: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed near Jamnagar. Jul 15, 2013: A MiG fighter of IAF crashed at Uttarlai airbase in Rajasthan’s Barmer district. Even this new year in Jan 3, 2018, A MiG 29K crashed at Goa Airport.
    1
  24279. Foreigners always complain that Chinese people are rude, spit in public, smoke in public, litter, jump queues, jaywalk, disobey traffic laws, when not all Chinese people are like that. Through this system, the government hopes to discourage such disgraceful behavior, and if they continue until their score falls too low, they will be barred from buying plane tickets to fly to other countries and make nuisance of themselves overseas.
    1
  24280. +luban No.7 I agree. See? the foreigners are already moving on to talk about microchip implants.
    1
  24281.  @Lee_yip  No, @Red Disaster spelling wrong and @李云舒 corrected him.
    1
  24282. @Red Disaster No, you misspelled. Taiwan is a county of China, like Guangdong county or Fujian county.
    1
  24283. @Red Disaster According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore (Link hrw.org/asia/singapore ) Singapore’s political environment is stifling. Citizens face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. In 2017, the country tightened the already strict limits on public assemblies contained in the Public Order Act, which requires police permits for any “cause-related” assembly outside the closely monitored “Speakers’ Corner.” Now doesn't Singapore’s political system sound very similar to China's political system?
    1
  24284. @Red Disaster China's economy is world's 2nd largest, Singapore's economy is ranked 34th in the world, so how exactly is Singapore’s economy much better than China's?
    1
  24285. @Red Disaster Singaporen voted for the same, authoritarian party (PAP) for over 50 years, so what's the point of democracy? It's president is publicly elected? Who voted for Singapore president Halimah Yacob? What's the poll results for President Yacob's election, you tell me?
    1
  24286. @Red Disaster Source: ‘Stop at 2' Campaign Works Too Well; Singapore Urges New Baby Boom latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-06-21-mn-8983-story.html A lengthy campaign to persuade parents in Singapore to “stop at two” children has worked too well, and government officials are now offering a package of financial incentives in an attempt to spark a baby boom.
    1
  24287. @Red Disaster If Singapore's economy is so great then where are the famous Singapore companies? Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Singapore compared to China?
    1
  24288.  @Lee_yip  李云舒 is saying Taiwan is a county of China, not a country. Did you read his comment carefully?
    1
  24289.  @Lee_yip  So you agree that Taiwan is a county of China then? Then we are in agreement.
    1
  24290.  @Lee_yip  Why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa? Nobody expected the communists to succeed, yet look at where we are today. During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage; they were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were lousy, and they had far fewer numbers (only 50 communist members in 1921) over the Kuomintang. The KMT on the other hand, had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training, and far superior numbers over the the communists. Securing victory against the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT. Yet the communists survived all KMT attempts to wipe them out, employing strategies like "Long March" (长征) and despite KMT's initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan). This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland.
    1
  24291. Hong Kong will eventually be fully returned back to China by 2047 anyway, once the Sino-British declaration finally expires after 50 years after the 1997 handover. Chinese government is patient and there's no need to lift a finger and eventually Hong Kong will be fully reunified with the mainland in the future.
    1
  24292.  @DZ477  Is mainland China even interfering in Hong Kong's internal affairs? I mean, Hong Kong have their own government separate from from the mainland, and despite months of protests, Beijing hasn't even lifted a finger in Hong Kong's affairs. I mean, Hong Kong even held an election resulting in landslide victory for pro-democracy candidates, whom now occupy more than 300 seats in their government, yet why are the HK protestors still complaining?
    1
  24293. Trump: "Grab them by the pussy" Xi Jinping: "Grab Trump by the nuts"
    1
  24294.  @maynardyorke  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. When back when Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. The KMT tried several times to wipe the communists and they nearly succeeded if not for Mao's strategem, the Long March, in which communist forces travelled incredible distances to evade the KMT and brought the communists back from the brink of extinction at the hands of the KMT. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  24295.  @sithdemon5965  laowhy86 has a history of lying to his audiences. For example, serpentza and laowhy86 claimed that the Dune movie posters in China excluded black actress Sharon Ducan-Brewster. But this has since been debunked and the Dune movie posters in China do feature Sharon in them. Video:youtu.be/zu6WJBVMgHM So is laowhy86 really a reliable source when it comes to understanding China, given his history of dishonesty?
    1
  24296.  @staniel814  "神州 Shenzhou shut up" Why not attempt to refute my points instead of telling me to shut up?
    1
  24297.  @zilun  Why did Kuomintang even lose the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa in the first place? During the Chinese Civil War, nobody expected the communists to succeed, yet look at where we are today.
    1
  24298.  @jadapinkett1656  There's literally proof that the CIA spent over a million dollars to train Tibetan guerillas to engage in separatist activities in Tibet. It's evidence of US interference in China's internal affairs.
    1
  24299.  @jadapinkett1656  We literally have proof that American spent over a million dollars funding separatists in Tibet. Isn't this an example of foreign interference in China's internal affairs?
    1
  24300.  @jadapinkett1656  14th Dalai Lama accepted American money to carry out separatist activities in Tibet against the central government. This is evidence of foreign interference in China's internal affairs.
    1
  24301.  @mchammer3927  "神州 Shenzhou some people are already brain wash, good luck" Yes. It's because of the colonial mentality that continues to plague the people of former colonies.
    1
  24302. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  24303. 轮子只靠黑中国吃饭。
    1
  24304. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24305. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24306.  @GabrielEddy  "神州 Shenzhou Prove to me that Taiwan still maintains that eleven-dash line claim today, not in 1949. Not 1970. Not 1990. Today." There hasn't been any amendments to RoC's claim, so they still maintain the claim to the Eleven Dash Line. For example, in 2016, the RoC rejected the arbitral tribunal ruling over the South China Sea.
    1
  24307. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24308. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  24309. ​ @valenrn8657  "神州 Shenzhou Your ignorance of ""it was inhabited by various peoples" hides your side's imperialist past." Look, this is what you wrote earlier: "神州 Shenzhou > Xinjiang was part of China even before Jesus Christ himself was born FALSE." But the statement is clearly true, because even you admitted that Han Dynasty Emperor Wu (r. 141–87 BC) had wrested control over Xinjiang, and that this was before Jesus Christ himself was born. So you cannot even prove this statement of mine wrong.
    1
  24310.  @valenrn8657  So you accept Hawaii as part of the US, then why can't you accept the fact that Xinjiang, Tibet, etc were part of China for longer than the US even has Hawaii?
    1
  24311.  @laglorialafenishmai  According to the principal Chinese sources, Bodhidharma came from the Western Regions, which refers to Central Asia, so what makes you think Bodhidharma is South Indian when there exists a possibility that he is Persian Central Asian?
    1
  24312.  @11111110  Who is locking them up? You clearly see the buses that come and pick up Uighur passengers to let them visit their families so how is this a prison then? And you keep claiming "more people died in the camps than at the hands of terrorists" but you given zero evidence to support your claim so far. Look at Xinjiang and it has become much safer ever since this program was set up so where's your proof then?
    1
  24313.  @laglorialafenishmai  China has long overtaken India in many areas. -China is world's 2nd largest economy, India is world's 7th. -China has world's 2nd highest military spending, India has world's 5th. -China has world's 2nd highest research spending, while India is 6th. -China has literacy rate of 96.4%, India has literacy rate of 72.1%. -China has Global Hunger Index of 7.5(low) whereas India's is 31.4(serious) -China is world's 3rd largest arms exporter. India is world's largest arms importer.
    1
  24314.  @dxsaqibdy  Xinjiang was part of China long before Islam itself was born! Only later did the Islamic invaders conquered the region and converted the natives to Islam, so who are the invaders that need to get out here?
    1
  24315.  @dxsaqibdy  There are always solutions to gender imbalance in China. For example, Chinese men can purchase Vietnamese bride for $3,200. Source: Rural Chinese Men Are Buying Vietnamese Brides businessinsider.com/rural-chinese-men-are-buying-vietnamese-brides-for-3200-2014-8/
    1
  24316.  @laglorialafenishmai  Unity in diversity? Accepting others? India has been ranked among the world's most racist country in a survey in which over 40% of Indians don't want a neighbor of another race as neighbor. Source: Map shows world's 'most racist' countries: Jordan and India named the world's least tolerant countries dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2325502/Map-shows-worlds-racist-countries-answers-surprise-you.html
    1
  24317.  @laglorialafenishmai  Unity in diversity? Accepting others? Look at the number of riots in India and how many Indians lost their lives because of rioting. Source: List of riots in India wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_riots_in_India
    1
  24318. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24319. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  24320. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24321.  @alexbosorogan7501  "name one invention that china had after 1800--- i dare you" Holographic Fans. A company based in eastern China’s Jiangsu province has wowed many online with their holographic fans, which make it seem like images are projected mid-air. Souce: South China Morning Post.
    1
  24322.  @minimalisttraveler9337  "You're obviously Chinese" Is there something wrong with being Chinese?
    1
  24323.  @minimalisttraveler9337  Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? I've watch Western media like Fox News, CNN and BBC and they paint negative image of China and constantly demonise our country. Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  24324. In the West, they only hear the bad and the ugly about China.
    1
  24325.  @jamesdon4303  How did China violate the Sino-British declaration? Hong Kong today currently has their own government separate from the mainland. Hong Kong has their own separate judiciary system. Hong Kong has their own passport (Hong Kong passport) as well as currency (Hong Kong dollars) separate from the mainland. Hong Kong conducts elections (the pro-democracy side won a landslide victory in the recent election) and Beijing does not cast any votes in Hong Kong's elections. So how exactly did China violate the Sino-British declaration?
    1
  24326.  @henryh3800  Hong Kong clearly have their own separate judiciary system, so how did China violate the Sino-British declaration? And universal suffrage wasn't promised according to Hong Kong Basic Law, it only states that it was an eventual goal that's all. About the HK National Security Law, every state has their own national security law. According to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 (香港基本法第二十三條) Hong Kong shall enact laws to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government. This is the basis of the HK NSL and is supported by HK Basic Law Article 23, so again, how exactly did China violate the Sino-British declaration?
    1
  24327.  @MarkYeung1  Canada and U.S have a much smaller population to feed than the world's most populous country, China. You should be comparing how India feeds its population compared to China.
    1
  24328.  @MarkYeung1  India has more cultivated lands than China, what are you talking about? Countries by cultivated land 1. India (1,891,761 square km) 2. United States (1,681,826 square km) 3. Russia (1,265,267 square km) 4. China (1,238,013 square km) 5. Brazil (800,485 square km) ... source:wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_use_statistics_by_country
    1
  24329.  @paisley1134  If China wanted to "let a virus loose" then why'd China inform the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019?
    1
  24330.  @roverdank8260  Neither would one usually expect a bartender to take part in debunking propaganda either.
    1
  24331.  @roverdank8260  Did you know that Daniel owns a bar in Shenzhen?
    1
  24332.  @roverdank8260  I've seen videos of Daniel Dumbrill operating the Bar, whether it's delivery of a batch of hops or other materials used in his craft brewery.
    1
  24333.  @roverdank8260  I won't call Adrian Zenz an intellectual, there's actually a number of flaws in his work, that have been pointed out by the folks at Grayzone like Max Blumenthal and Ajit Singh. Turns out that the figure of 1 million Uighurs in detention come from interviews with just 8 Uighurs and extrapolated their opinions to arrive at the exaggerated figure of 1 million Uighurs in detention.
    1
  24334.  @roverdank8260  Adrian Zenz's report isn't even peer-reviewed, he even wrote that 80% of IUDs insertions were performed in Xinjiang. The math works out to every Uighur women in Xinjiang undergoing 4-8 IUD insertion surgeries every day, how can such a person like Adrian Zenz be an intellectual?
    1
  24335. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24336.  @luciferlam6556  About stealing technology, even the Americans stole German technology too. At the start of WWII, American tanks were largely inferior to German tanks, but after Nazi surrender, American tanks absorbed Nazi Panzer (Tank) technology and that's why American tanks are so powerful today. The German Airforce (Luftwaffe) aircraft designs were so advanced that Americans incorporated those designs into their aircraft. Even the Nazi V2 Rocket Scientists were put to work by NASA on Moon landing missions. So every country steals from one another at some point in history.
    1
  24337.  @luciferlam6556  Westerners also benefited from Chinese inventions in the past. Ancient Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions 四大发明 which have changed history. Paper and Printing made the recording and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous voyages much safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people blame Westerners for using our inventions?
    1
  24338.  @luciferlam6556  Did you know that one of the greatest ripoffs of all time was the U.S. theft of German patents after WWII? Why American tanks were lousy at start of WWII, but after Nazi surrender, American tanks became more powerful then? Americans stole German engineering technology too that's why! Source: One of the greatest ripoffs of all time was the US theft of German patents after WWII https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/patents.html
    1
  24339.  @micheleeeable  Huawei is not perfect, but I don't see whats the problem here. I mean, Apple users also complain about iPhone faults, and Apple sometimes does not fix its issues. Just like Samsung phone also have problems too (like the battery heating and exploding) and Samsung may not fix all its problems. That's the way every business operates, products have problems, some get addressed, and some don't. But when you said "You really can't trust Chinese people" you are making a blanket anti-Chinese people statement here.
    1
  24340.  @micheleeeable  Infrastructure is still very new (especially 5G network, since the technology is still new) and of course you can't expect everything to be smooth flowing all the time isn't it? I mean, despite your anti-Chinese people rhetoric, Huawei is still becoming more popular worldwide, and Huawei even overtook Apple as the world's 2nd largest smartphone maker, only behind Samsung at number one. Source: Huawei Overtakes Apple to Become Second Biggest Smartphone Maker bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-03/huawei-again-overtakes-apple-as-global-smartphone-market-tanks This shows that people are still buying Huawei products (even more than Apple) despite your claims of Huawei service being not up to par. It appears to me, that you are just blaming Huawei without even giving Huawei a chance to prove itself that's all.
    1
  24341.  @micheleeeable  Now you are accusing Chinese of lying? Who's to say that you yourself making up this story about Huawei's services then? Since you don't even bother to quote links? Besides Huawei, other Chinese phones like Xiaomi, Lenovo, Oppo, ZTE, etc are slowly becoming more popular worldwide too. Source: Top 10 Smartphone Brands in the World 2018 techzac.com/top-10-smartphone-manufacturers-in-the-world/
    1
  24342.  @successkim7920  Android is depriving itself of the potential business from 1.4 billion people in this way. It's their funeral.
    1
  24343.  Alexandria School of Science  Singapore is home to US aircraft carrier base. Those aircraft carriers that patrol the South China Seas originated from Singapore.
    1
  24344.  @praisethelegendarymessiahs2617  Singapore has purchased up to 12 of U.S F-35 fighter jets, so Singapore is in fact, supporting the U.S Military Industrial Complex.
    1
  24345.  Alexandria School of Science  Singapore and the United States have signed a defence pact since 1990, yet you claim Singapore is no ally to the United States? How? The facts speak for themselves, yet you're method of attacking my argument is to claim that maybe my English proficiency is poor? And it's a fact that by purchasing the F-35 fighters, Singapore is supporting the U.S military-industrial complex, so how am I not providing facts?
    1
  24346.  Alexandria School of Science  "神州 Shenzhou It wasn't defence pact and you are creating fake news." Video: Singapore, US reaffirm excellent and long-standing defence relations amid COVID-19 youtu.be/l144w-oK8jM So how is Singapore not an ally of the United States, you tell me?
    1
  24347.  @tinatang1  "神州 Shenzhou Lots of countries purchase weapons are aircrafts from the US because China is the new kid on the block regarding weapons and aircrafts." Therefore, countries who purchase weapons and aircraft from the United States are U.S allies won't you agree?
    1
  24348.  Alexandria School of Science  "As far as I recall, China is not selling much weapons except to help some ASEAN countries in shipbuilding." New research suggests China is now the world's second biggest producer of weapons, behind the United States and ahead of Russia. Video: China is world's second-biggest arms trader: Think tank youtu.be/V5SaQfNipTU
    1
  24349.  @derangeddroid4911  You said: "神州 Shenzhou are u even from Singapore, I’m from Singapore myself and I can confirm we are neutral, just like Switzerland" Just because you are from Singapore, means that you can confirm Singapore is neutral? I already stated that Singapore buys U.S F-35 fighter jets from the United States, how can you continue to claim Singapore is neutral, you tell me? Singapore is literally funding the U.S military-industrial complex through buying U.S weapons.
    1
  24350.  @erickm8799  "神州 Shenzhou Why only you can buy more that USD 1 trillion US government debt instruments and a few billions agricultural products from US yearly?" China buys U.S debt to use as potential leverage over the United States. And China is buying U.S agriculture under Phase 1 of Trump's economic deal with China. And the fact remains is that Singapore buys U.S F-35 fighter jets, so Singapore is clearly a U.S ally as well as supporting the U.S military industrial complex through purchasing weapons.
    1
  24351.  @derangeddroid4911  It's not just Singapore buying weapons from U.S (supporting the U.S military industrial complex in the process) U.S also have a military base in Singapore, how does that not make Singapore a U.S ally? Even read what Singapore Prime Minster Lee Hsien Loong said: Singapore considers USA an ally.
    1
  24352.  Alexandria School of Science  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  24353.  @derangeddroid4911  Watch the video where U.S Vice President is Kamala Harris visit to Singapore. Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong words were: What will influence perceptions of U.S. resolve and commitment to the region will be what the U.S. does going forward: how it repositions itself in the region, how it engages its broad range of friends and partners and allies in the region, and how it continues the fight against terrorism. Countries make calculations and take positions, and they have to make recalculations and adjust their positions from time to time. Sometimes it can be done smoothly. Sometimes there are hiccups. Sometimes things go awry and take time to put right.” Clearly, Singapore is a U.S ally in the region, why deny what Singapore PM said?
    1
  24354.  @derangeddroid4911  Singapore PM Lee was clearly including Singapore as one of U.S's allies in the region. PM Lee was responding to a reporter's questions on "Does that change your calculus on how you can rely on the U.S.A as a partner in this region, both economically and militarily." so clearly, Singapore considers itself a U.S ally. Video:youtu.be/1QClX_KvwgQ
    1
  24355. Singapore also joined on the Western sanctioning of Russia in 2022, being the only ASEAN country to have done so. In response, Russia place Singapore on a list of "unfriendly countries" so was it really a wise course of action for Singapore to have taken a side?
    1
  24356. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  24357. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24358. Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24359. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24360. As stated in Republic of China's own constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24361. 45 million? Isn't China the country with the world's largest population today?
    1
  24362. @Red Disaster There might be lower demand for Chinese exports, so China should focus on domestic spending. Instead of relying on USA's 300 million consumers, if we can somehow transform our 1.4 billion into consumers then we'll be the largest consumer market in the world.
    1
  24363. @Red Disaster About Poverty in China, according to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china
    1
  24364. @Chun Him WONG China has lifted 700 million people out of poverty in just 40 years, whereas the whole rest of the world only lifted 150 million by comparison. Video: Historical achievement: Take 700 million out of poverty youtu.be/CljWffPgmG8 "China has lifted 728 million people out of poverty by international standards. The whole rest of the world has only lifted 152 million." - John Ross, Well-known columnist in UK, Former Deputy mayor of London.
    1
  24365.  @lau9076  You're saying the US is a democracy? As in a government by the people, of the people, for the people? Then why is it that US President have such low level of approval? Because the fact is, their government is unable to deliver what the people want. In contrast, surveys in Russia and China indicate around 80-90% level of approval for President Putin and President Xi, so it's apparent that the government is able to deliver progress and development for the Russians and Chinese.
    1
  24366. Chinese government is willing to sacrifice China's economy and halt production, closing tourist attractions, imposing lockdown, banning mass gatherings, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and contain the virus. Now it's finally paying off that the virus is under control in China and we are cautiously reopening our economy. But in Western countries like US and UK, their economies are far too precious to sacrifice so human health has to be sacrificed instead. Donald Trump wants to reopen the economy by Easter and Boris Johnson is relying on "herd immunity" to the pull through. So human lives have to be sacrificed instead of the economy.
    1
  24367.  @dayyumsonvlogs4152  "china is the worst country in the world" China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  24368.  @bukujuku1541  Look at all those racially-motivated attacks against Asian Americans (Asian Canadians, Asian Australians, Asian Europeans, etc) because American politicians like Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo choose to refer to the virus by it's improper name. Video: Asian Americans face discrimination in wake of the coronavirus youtu.be/t_IyTxRNUYk
    1
  24369.  @moonlaceblackrose4519  China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China bought the West time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    1
  24370.  @MH-il1lk  China is literally the world's largest printer of Bibles, what do you mean they have to be smuggled in?
    1
  24371. Ukraine is not a democracy. According to Freedom House (a nonpartisan think tank that ranks democracies) Ukraine has been labeled a transitional or hybrid regime. The Economist Intelligence Unit, also pegged Ukraine as a “hybrid regime.”
    1
  24372. Meanwhile, Western journalists continue to predict an economic hard landing for China. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown 2021 Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  24373. Completely agree, India very far ahead China in terms of democracy. China definitely stand zero chance catching up India's standards of democracy. 别破坏阿三的大白日梦。当作我们做个好事给他们吧～😉
    1
  24374. The protestor will also admit that the money they received from CIA to protest in HK is very generous.
    1
  24375. In 2017, China sold more electric vehicles than Europe and USA Wikipedia: Top PEV global markets stock Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Top_PEV_global_markets_stock_2017_final_with_California.png
    1
  24376.  @MarkYeung1  Many Chinese are interested in learning about the West, traveling overseas (i.e Chinese tourists) and studying overseas (i.e Chinese students) but it appears that many Westerners (but not all) tend to believe what Western MSM says about China without bothering to set foot in the country itself.
    1
  24377. From your presentation, it can be inferred that the country that cares the most about Taiwan is mainland China. The U.S is seeking to transfer Taiwan's advanced semiconductor technology to the U.S, and after this process is complete, Taiwan island would no longer be of value to the United States, that they would seek to risk U.S soldiers lives to defend Taiwan. And it's true that mainland China could simply stop trading with Taiwan, but the reason they aren't doing so is because they still seek the peaceful reunification where possible.
    1
  24378. Brahmos is only supersonic cruise missile, while China has hypersonic cruise missile DF-ZF (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WU-14 ) that is said to be "almost impossible to intercept by conventional missile defense systems, which track incoming objects via satellite sensors and ground and sea radar." China is also 3rd nation in world have anti-satellite technology according to (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-satellite_weapon ) allowing us to take out a satellite in orbit, using ground launched missile.
    1
  24379. +Venkat Raman You think India isn't stealing military technology from Russia to make Brahmos? It is joint project between Russia and India, so what makes you think it is Indian invention? China has weapons of our own, like the hypersonic missile DF-ZF according to (theguardian.com/science/2014/jan/16/china-tests-hypersonic-missile-vehicle ) Brahmos is only a supersonic cruise missile, not hypersonic, so what makes you think India can compete with China on cruise missiles when India doesn't even have hypersonic missile of its own?
    1
  24380. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  24381.  @koblongata  "神州 Shenzhou Er, every time Russia calls for a peace talk, they regroup and double down on the attack..." Because the Ukrainian negotiators are puppets controlled by the Ukrainian ultra-nationalists. Did you know that an Ukrainian peace negotiator, Denys Kireev, was assasinated by Ukrainian ultra-nationalists on his way to the peace negotiation? The ultra-nationalists neo-Nazis in Ukraine would never surrender, and that's why Russia is forced to continue the offensive in order to achieve the objectives of demilitarizing and de-nazifying Ukraine. You said: "Oh, so are you suggesting that whoever invades your home, you will leave it to them?" What chance does Ukraine have against Russia? By now it's apparent that NATO and USA aren't going to send troops to defend Ukraine, nor are they willing to honor Zelenskyy's demands for a No-Fly Zone over Ukraine. Ukraine's application to join NATO is unlikely to succeed, because that would mean NATO is obliged to send reinforcements to Ukraine if it were a member, and I just can't see this happening. Ukraine has been effectively "abandoned" by NATO (in Zelenskyy's own admission), so how is Ukraine going to turn the tides against Russia? If Zelenskyy truly cared about the lives of Ukrainians, he would surrender, instead of using Ukrainian lives as a human shield. By refusing to surrender, Zelenskyy is prolonging the inevitable and causing more Ukrainians to lose their lives. By releasing prisoners and arming civilians with rifles, Zelenskyy is sowing chaos and attempting to maximise civilian casualties. By removing the age restrictions for conscription, Zelenskyy is enlisting child soldiers to fight and die for his refusal to surrender. You said: "Russia has been invading and threatening small Eastern European countries for 30 years, they will not stop before they swallow the whole of Eastern Europe." Putin has made it clear that Russia has no plans to annex Ukraine. Putin had made it clear that he wanted assurances that NATO would not expand eastwards (i.e that Ukraine would not be allowed to join NATO). In fact, many NATO countries like Germany and France did not want to admit Ukraine as a member (citing Ukraine government corruption concerns) but they refused to put that down in paper and reassure Putin. After realizing that for years, his words have fallen on deaf ears, Putin decided to act.
    1
  24382.  @koblongata  "神州 Shenzhou China is pretty much like Russia, claiming Ukrainians welcome the Russian army, it's propaganda, not real." Could you show me some examples of Chinese media claiming that the Ukrainians welcome the Russian Army like you claimed? China stance is neutral and hopes both Ukraine and Russia could arrive at a negotiated settlement for peace. China hopes that the conflict would end as soon as possible, and China is sending humanitarian aid to Ukraine, unlike NATO countries sending lethal aid to Ukraine in order to prolong the conflict.
    1
  24383.  @charleswomack2166  Watch Cyrus' video: "The Chinese Government Tried to Hire Me - You Won't Believe What I Did" and it turns out that he rejected the money that was offered to him, so why are you accusing him of being a "white wumao"? Do you have actual evidence that he accepted the payment?
    1
  24384.  @echelon2k8  So you finally acknowledged that China is a neutral country, that's why China is continuing to trade with both Russia and Ukraine. Even other neutral countries like India also still continue trading with Russia. Even many EU countries are purchasing gas for rubles from Russia.
    1
  24385.  @StephenMortimer  Today the Manchu have pretty much, renounced their Manchu culture and assimilated into Chinese culture.
    1
  24386.  @StephenMortimer  Today, the United States is consist of Caucasian American (white), African American (black), Latin American (brown), Asian Americans (yellow) and Native Americans (red) and they are all Americans. Just like China has over 50 ethnic groups including Han, Tibetan, Mongol, Manchu, and even some Koreans in Northeastern China. But they are all Chinese so why should China switch our capital?
    1
  24387. @Wolfreign Valenford Trump going to build a wall at the US-Mexico border.
    1
  24388.  @funkenmole6050  Corruption is universal phenomena I agree, but at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-graft campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? In my opinion, Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign, but after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    1
  24389. Indian government will have to make a painful choice, like when Chinese government sacrificed China's economy and stop production, implement quarantine measures, closing tourist attractions, banning mass gatherings, and so on, all in a bid to prioritise human health and combat the coronavirus. The damage to our economy, loss of production, loss of income, loss of tourism, was worth it to contain the virus. Now its finally paying off that the virus is pretty much under control and our economy is slowly restarting. But in some Western countries like US and UK, their economy is too precious to sacrifice, so human health has to be sacrificed instead.
    1
  24390.  @mohd.adnankhan7670  Every country that eats meat is cruel to animals, not just China alone.
    1
  24391. Hopefully nothing will happen to the CFO of Tik Tok, like what happened to Meng Wanzhou of Huawei.
    1
  24392. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24393. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24394. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  24395. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, if you read its constitution.
    1
  24396. China has the world's largest population, so statistically speaking, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality.
    1
  24397. Singapore has been under the authoritarian single party rule of PAP for 57 years, much like how China has been under CPC rule for 73 years.
    1
  24398. 阿三觉得美印关系比中美的好～看他们的评论就知道。
    1
  24399. But does USA want to break its economic relations with China, for India's sake? What has India to offer to USA?
    1
  24400. +Yash Gaming And Top 10s Did you know that India is North Korea's 2nd largest trading partner after China, and even more than Russia?
    1
  24401. + Yash Gaming and Top 10s So you can't just say "China supports North Korea" and that is end of discussion, when other countries like India also support North Korea.
    1
  24402. +Yash Gaming So how does your logic even make sense here? Support is still support, no matter the extent.
    1
  24403. @Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad About democracy, why do you allow ordinary people to make political decisions regarding the country's future? Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (e.g. they do not turn up to vote) or they may base their decision on emotions not logic (e.g Many British don't like immigrants so they vote for Britain to leave the EU) or they may lack political awareness of the country's situation. Or they may be easily influenced by foreign powers (Russian interference in US elections). Why not let the people who know how to govern, govern? India is not doing well under democracy, so why continue to follow democracy? Because Westerners say so? 1 in 4 Indians haven't even attended school yet you trust them to vote in India's elections?
    1
  24404.  @jayshon1348  Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of China, Hong Kong was taken from us and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even after Britain renounced ownership over it's former colonies, Hong Kong wasn't even fully returned back to China.
    1
  24405.  @jayshon1348  I've seen American tourists behaving just as bad. Here is social experiment on Americans treat Chinese in America and also how Chinese people treat Americans while in China. The Americans were rude and unhelpful while the Chinese were mostly polite and helpful. Video: https://youtu.be/P0_mz7R3thU
    1
  24406.  @jayshon1348  About Taiwan, during the the Chinese Civil War, the communists were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were crappy and they had far fewer numbers (only 50 communist members in 1921) over the Nationalist Kuomintang. The KMT on the other hand, had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training, superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa? This demonstrates KMT gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland.
    1
  24407.  @jayshon1348  Sorry for the ad link. This is the social experiment of how Americans treat Chinese in America and also how Chinese people treat Americans while in China. Video: https://youtu.be/04sTkhTRmWE
    1
  24408.  @jayshon1348  You said Hong Konger don't want to be part of China, but majority the Hong Kong protestors consist of highschool students, who haven't even graduated from school, yet they already think they know the best way to govern Hong Kong? Even better than the Hong Kong Chief Executive? Their teenage minds have not yet matured nor been exposed to real world politics of Hong Kong. Look at the rest of the real world working adults and they got jobs to do, mouths to feed, families to raise, bills to pay, etc and they aren't protesting. So why should Hong Kong government bow down to the demands of highschool kids then?
    1
  24409.  @jayshon1348  Many of those Hong Kong protestors weren't even 18 years of age and they were under the legal voting age in Hong Kong (which is 21 years old) so what makes you think their political opinions count then? They haven't even graduated from school yet they already think they know the real political situation of Hong Kong? I'm using logic to back up my points whereas you have given nothing substantial to support your argument. Yet you're claiming my argument is immature when you are the one supporting highschool kids protesting? Why don't you explain why Hong Kong government should bow down to high school kids demands is logical then you tell me?
    1
  24410. @Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad What "greatness of democracies" are you talking about? Look at history and human civilization was predominantly ruled by authoritarian rule and oligarchies. Political power was oftentimes not held in the hands of the masses, instead it was concentrated in the hands of the few elites, be it nobles (aristocracy), priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchies). Such political systems were popular because they were stable and simply because they worked. The elites were well-educated and politically savvy to make important decisions regarding the country's future, while the ignorant masses were kept far away from politics. Whereas democracy has a long history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed and even Republic of Rome fell. These proto-democracies failed and neither was democracy ever popular outside of Greece in the ancient world. Modern Western democracy is a separate entity, and it is unproven in history, having only 100-200 years of history that's all. So its not guaranteed that modern democracy is going to be successful
    1
  24411.  @jayshon1348  What makes you think the video is a re-enactment and not real? And you keep on discounting the value of Chinese tourists, then why are so many countries catering to Chinese tourists, such as offering tours in Mandarin language, using Chinese characters to attract Chinese tourists to spend coin on your economies? Since 2012, tourists from China have been the world's top spender in international tourism, leading global outbound travel. In 2016, the country accounted for 21% of the world's international tourism spending, or $261 billion. Source: China accounts for 21% of int’l tourism spending – UNWTO https://thepienews.com/news/china-accounts-for-21-of-international-tourism-spending/
    1
  24412. @Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad Democracies caused the World Wars. Adolf Hitler was voted into power in a democracy, by preying on German people's resentment towards the humiliating Treaty of Versailles and he promised to make Germany great again (which admittedly he did) Similarly, Donald Trump came to power in a democracy by preying on America's resentment towards China and seduced votes from gullible Americans with false promises of making America great again. See the similarities here? And for your information, the Soviet Union wasn't a democracy, yet they fought in WWII as well. The last campaign fought of WWII, was the 1945 Soviet Invasion of Japanese occupied Manchuria, that finally ended WWII with the Japanese surrender. Source: Wikipedia: Soviet invasion of Manchuria wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Manchuria So it can be said that Communism actually won World War II, since that was the last campaign fought of WWII.
    1
  24413. @Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad After the events of 1989, there have been no major incidents of riots in the mainland. Whereas India still has ongoing riots even in the 21st century and where many Indians perished (as many as 4000 deaths) Here is a list of riots in India. Source: List of riots in India wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_riots_in_India So what makes you think democracy is suitable for India you tell me? At least people in China today are safe and secure from riots so that they can continue to improve life in China. But you can't say the same for India.
    1
  24414.  @jayshon1348  I used logic and cite sources to argue my points, but you don't even show anything to support your arguments and you resort to belittling and insulting me, just because my views happen to differ from yours. Why should Hong Kong government bow down to the demands of highschool kids? Many of the Hong Kong protestors aren't even 18 years of age, (so they aren't legally allowed to vote) so why should their political views be taken into account? Their teenage minds aren't matured to understand Hong Kong's real world politics in the first place.
    1
  24415. ​@Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad said "For example when a lady journalist pronounced Xi Jinping as eleven jinping, she was immediately fired. Had this happened in India, this would have been brushed of as an unintended comical event." Do you actually research what you wrote? That incident occurred in India, under India's state TV channel Doordarshan News. Source: 'Eleven Jinping': Indian TV fires anchor over blooper bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-29274792 India's state TV channel has fired a news anchor for referring to Chinese President Xi Jinping as "Eleven" Jinping. The presenter apparently confused Mr Xi's name with the Roman numerals XI. Her name has been removed from the panel of newsreaders, Doordarshan news chief Archana Datta told BBC Hindi, describing the error as "grave". You can't even make proper arguments yourself, and you are passing off Indian State Media's actions as coming from China?
    1
  24416.  @jayshon1348  You said earlier, and I quote: "I'm sorry but your view is just as immature as kids you refer too." so isn't that belittling my views? And what "old HK people" are protesting? Every news outlet shows those HK protestors to be mainly consisting of students, so why take their political views seriously when they are just kids? They are "underaged voters" so why should the Hong Kong government bow down to the demands of these kids you tell me?
    1
  24417.  @jayshon1348  Hong Kong propose the amendments to HK extradition bill, because of a certain incident. Some Hong Konger named Chan, took his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, and then flew back to Hong Kong alone, leaving her body in Taiwan. Chan has since confessed and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to face justice in Taiwan, but Hong Kong realized it has no existing extradition treaty with Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred on Taiwan, Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. That's why Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to the HK extradition bill in order to cover up this legal loophole. So do the HK student protestors even know what they are protesting about? Do the HK student protestors even read the extradition bill and understand its contents in their entirety?
    1
  24418. @Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad As the world's 2nd most populous country, India has a comparable workforce to China. Many Indians speak English, while Chinese people still struggle with English even today. India was founding member of WTO in 1995, yet China had a late entry in 2001. Republic of India was founded in 1947, while People's Republic of China was founded 2 years later in 1949. Yet despite all these advantages India enjoyed, China has long overtaken India in various fields. -China is world's 2nd largest economy, India is world's 7th. -China has world's 2nd highest military spending, India has world's 5th. -China has world's 2nd highest research spending, while India is 6th. -China has literacy rate of 96.4%, India has literacy rate of 72.1%. -China has Global Hunger Index of 7.5(low) whereas India's is 31.4(serious) -China is world's 3rd largest arms exporter. India is world's largest arms importer. So why do you still think "democracy" is good for India you tell me? Because the Westerners colonized India and told you so?
    1
  24419. @Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad China has produced many Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Lenovo, ZTE, DJI, Haier, Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, Bank of China, AgBank, ICBC, China Construction Bank, State Grid, Sinopec Group, China National Petroleum, CSCEC, China Minmetals, Ping An Insurance, Shenhua Energy, Midea Group, China State Shipbuilding Corporation, China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation, (this list is not exhaustive) and many of these companies have made it onto business magazine lists like Fortune Global 500 and Forbes Global 2000 Sources: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies Fortune Global 500 wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_Global_500 Forbes Global 2000 wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Global_2000 List of the largest shipbuilding companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_shipbuilding_companies On the other hand, where are all the famous Indian companies?
    1
  24420. @Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad China has world's fastest high-speed railway network, and our high-speed trains are world-class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have experimented balancing small objects like coins, stationery, and phones on their edges on a train moving at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) Video: youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE
    1
  24421. @Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad On the other hand, Indian trains are overcrowded, passengers sit on the roof or hang at the sides of moving trains and collisions and derailment and killed many Indians. There is an entire list of Indian railway accidents where so many Indian lives have been tragically lost. Source: List of railway accidents and incidents in India wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_railway_accidents_and_incidents_in_India
    1
  24422. @Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad China is home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight and Tianhe-2 and in the 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source: China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion). This means Chinese researchers have access to some of the world's most advanced facilities to conduct their research. On the other hand, how many supercomputers does India have in the Top500?
    1
  24423. @Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad China's ghost cities are slowly being filled up. For example, in 2011, London’s Daily Mail reported that the Zhengzhou New Area was China’s largest ghost city, but today, the city has a population of 10,120,000 inhabitants, and had a GDP of 1,014 billion(RMB) in 2018. Check out this beautiful video of Zhengzhou: youtube.com/watch?v=jFdLkgDS-QE&t=8 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for the best experience) This just means that China just needs time to fill up our "ghost cities" since there are millions of people migrating from the rural countryside to urban centers to find jobs.
    1
  24424. @Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad It could also be possible that fewer military accidents are happening as the People's Liberation Army (world's largest land army) starts modernizing. Most of the military accidents listed are related to PLA Navy submarines so of course some discretion is needed with regards to submarine technology. But Chinese submarine technology is superior in certain areas to even Russia (the most technologically sophisticated undersea warfare threat faced by the United States Navy) Source: China's Advanced Submarines Are 'Breaking Records' nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/chinas-advanced-submarines-are-breaking-records-26811 China has successfully developed and fielded diesel-electric submarines with Air Independent Propulsion (AIP) technology, unlike Russia, which has thus far failed to develop a comparable analogue for its future Project 677 Lada-class vessels.
    1
  24425. @Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad As of 2009, the Chinese government has been cracking down on unregulated mining operations, which in 2009 accounted for nearly 80% of the country's 16,000 mines. The closure of about 1,000 dangerous small mines in 2008 helped to cut in half the average number of miners killed, to about six a day, in the first six months of 2009, according to the government. Major gas explosions in coal mines remain a problem, though the number of accidents and deaths have gradually declined year by year, the chief of the State Administration of Work Safety, Luo Lin, told a national conference in September 2009.
    1
  24426. @Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad I do agree however that coal mining is dangerous and coal power pollutes our air. That's why Chinese government is making the switch from fossil fuels to green energy, by building world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, Three Gorges Dam, to supply China with clean, renewable energy to fuel our growth. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtube.com/watch?v=b8cCsUBYSkw Thanks to Three Gorges Dam, China is now the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity, some 856.4 billion kilowatt hours a year – more than double the amount produced by Brazil, in second place. The top three is completed by Canada, which produces 376.7 billion kilowatt hours a year. India's hydroelectric power is only ranked at 7th place. Source: China produces the most electricity from hydroelectric power weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/
    1
  24427. @Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad You want to compare pollution levels between China and India? Look at list of most-polluted cities (Source: List of most-polluted cities by particulate matter concentration wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-polluted_cities_by_particulate_matter_concentration ) and Indian cities dominate the top most polluted cities Most-Polluted Cities: 1. Kanpur (India) 2. Faridabad (India) 3. Gaya (India) 4. Varnasi (India) 5. Patna (India) 6. Delhi (India) 7. Lucknow (India) 8. Bamenda (Camerroon) 9. Agra (India) 10. Gurgaon (India) 11. Muzaffarpur (India) 12. Peshawar (Pakistan) 13. Rawalpindi (Pakistan) 14. Jaipur (India) 15. Kampala (Uganda) 16. Patiala (India) 17. Jodhpur (India) 18. Narayangonj (Bangladesh) 19. Baoding (China) ... China's most polluted city only appears at 19th position, after all the Indian cities dominated it before.
    1
  24428. @Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad China is world's 3rd country to independently send people into space, after USA and USSR. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, onboard Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtube.com/watch?v=tIviKg4Mduw China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat in space, and even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, India, Vietnam, Malaysia, Singapore, etc, have not launched manned space missions of their own thus far. China is helping prove that Asians are just as capable of matching Westerners in space exploration.
    1
  24429.  @zhuoyuanchen3211  The communist party membership is made up of Chinese people, who've excelled in their region of expertise, so how is it not the legitimate government of China? The CCP is not perfect (then again, which government body is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, India, Europe and USA. Source:_Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India_ china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China), the world's 3rd largest arms exporter, having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army and funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all achieved by under CCP leadership, despite what the Western anti-Communist propaganda been denouncing all this while. Look at India as democracy and do you want China to follow India's path?
    1
  24430.  @MarkYeung1  It's surprising that during the 2019 Hong Kong riots, Hong Kong's population suddenly increased by 0.7%. Where did the increase in people come from? Perhaps there was possible foreign interference during 2019 Hong Kong riots? And many Hong Kong rioters committed acts of vandalism, smashed shop windows, breaking traffic lights, threw molotov cocktails, all while wearing black masks to obscure their identities. Now they fear reprisal for their actions, that's why there's a mass exodus of people in Hong Kong.
    1
  24431.  @MarkYeung1  Why'd Hong Kong's population increased during the 2019 Hong Kong riots? Sounds like possible foreign interference in Hong Kong. And like I said earlier, those Hong Kong rioters fear reprisal for their actions, which led to the mass exodus from Hong Kong. How's that surprising?
    1
  24432.  @MarkYeung1  Why'd Hong Kong's population increased during the 2019 Hong Kong riots? Sounds like foreigners were flocking to Hong Kong to keep the riots going. And like I said earlier, those Hong Kong rioters fear reprisal for their actions, which led to the mass exodus from Hong Kong.
    1
  24433.  @MarkYeung1  Many of those Hong Kongers who left for Britain still retain the "colonial mentality", as a result of the British controlling Hong Kong's education system while Hong Kong was still a British colony. BNO visa holders are not eligible for welfare benefits and they will have to live as second class citizens in Britain, which just goes to show how much the minds of many in Hong Kong remain colonized.
    1
  24434. You saw that on some Hollywood movie about hackers right?
    1
  24435.  @mikehenry5201  Then how do you know somebody is pressing DELETE key on the keyboard? You've seen it before in real life?
    1
  24436.  @mikehenry5201  Or use a pair of pliers and just pluck out the DELETE button on your keyboard so that it can never be pressed. Problem Solved!
    1
  24437.  @mikehenry5201  Have you ever tried pressing the DELETE key on your keyboard?
    1
  24438.  @mikehenry5201  Tell you what, just pluck out the DELETE button on your keyboard. Problem Solved! Now all your data will forever be safe!
    1
  24439.  @mikehenry5201  But you claim someone pressing the DELETE key can cause your doom, then why take that risk? Get rid of the DELETE key on your keyboard and no one can ever harm you! Problem Solved!
    1
  24440. United State's withdrawal from various organizations is only creating a vacuum that China can potentially fill. It's all part of the shift towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, from the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US's).
    1
  24441. Fourth is trust as well.
    1
  24442.  @stunningandbrave2520  If we look at the past 1000-2000 years of history, human societies gravitated towards authoritarian forms of governance, where political power is concentrated not in the hands of many, but in the hands of the few, be it nobles (aristocracy), priests (theocracy), or kings and emperors (monarchy). Such authoritarian systems were prevalent throughout history because they were stable and they worked! The elites were oftentimes politically savvy enough to make decisions for the whole country, while the ignorant masses were kept far away from politics. In fact, democracy wasn't even popular outside of Greece, among other ancient nations.
    1
  24443. Even the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24444. Even the U.S acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24445. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  24446. US army most powerful military in the world, but still take over 15 years to fight some terrorists in Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries in Middle East. The soldier's spouse, family and kids could have all grown up in the duration it takes for USA to finish a war.
    1
  24447. -Huawei's CFO, Meng Wanzhou was illegally detained by Canada for nearly 4 years. -Canada also claimed Indian government agents were behind a Sikh separatist assassination. -Canada also imposed sanctions on Russia. -Now Trump is launching a tariff war with Canada.
    1
  24448.  @x7j4  You asked "If you were attacked repeatedly on your frontyard by your neighbor, would you call the police?" So call the police then. Take the matter to court; to the ICJ or the ICC. Why hasn't Israel done that? Instead of calling the police, they choose to retaliate physically.
    1
  24449.  @MarkYeung1  Putin was previously nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2021.
    1
  24450.  @MarkYeung1  Nope. The peace prize has long been politicized.
    1
  24451. They specifically single out cotton in Xinjiang because they want to invoke images of cotton picking in USA's past and to somehow transfer that historical collective "guilt" onto China's actions in Xinjiang.
    1
  24452. If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it Israel... ... No, wait a minute, I meant to say believe it IS REAL!
    1
  24453. Look what Chinese "democracy" done to China, and what Indian "democracy" done to India. Republic of India was founded in 1947, and People's Republic of China was founded in 1949 (2 years later) but China has long since overtook India as world's 2nd largest economy, with world's largest land army PLA, and 2nd largest military expenditure after USA.
    1
  24454. Canada and Mexico were unprepared for Trump's tariffs. Whereas China has been preparing for additional tariffs since the trade war began during Trump's first term.
    1
  24455.  @aeoliaschenberg5880  "people who eat bat get the virus. That's a fact." That has been debunked by experts. Source: No, Coronavirus Was Not Caused by 'Bat Soup' health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/coronavirus-bat-soup
    1
  24456.  @aeoliaschenberg5880  New York actually got most of their cases from Europe, not China. New research indicates that the coronavirus began to circulate in the New York area by mid-February, weeks before the first confirmed case, and that travelers brought in the virus mainly from Europe, not Asia. Source: Most New York Coronavirus Cases Came From Europe, Genomes Show nytimes.com/2020/04/08/science/new-york-coronavirus-cases-europe-genomes.html “The majority is clearly European,” said Harm van Bakel, a geneticist at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, who co-wrote a study awaiting peer review.
    1
  24457.  @aeoliaschenberg5880  Because back in 2019, there's no actual confirmation of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus. Even Hong Kong SARS expect Dr Guan Yi claims that there was no human-to-human transmission. The first human-to-human transmission case in China was confirmed only on 20th Jan 2020 and that's when the government began implementing quarantine measures shortly after. Source: China confirms human-to-human transmission theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/20/coronavirus-spreads-to-beijing-as-china-confirms-new-cases (Dated to 20th Jan 2020)
    1
  24458.  @aeoliaschenberg5880  In 24 January, even President Trump has praised China's efforts and transparency in handling the coronavirus outbreak. US President Donald Trump thanked China on Friday (Jan 24) for its "efforts and transparency" in tackling a deadly virus that has triggered a vast quarantine in the country. Source: Trump praises China 'efforts and transparency' on Wuhan virus straitstimes.com/world/united-states/trump-praises-china-efforts-and-transparency-on-wuhan-virus "China has been working very hard to contain the Coronavirus," Trump tweeted, hours after the United States confirmed its second case of the Sars-like virus that has reached half a dozen countries. "The United States greatly appreciates their efforts and transparency," he added. "It will all work out well. In particular, on behalf of the American People, I want to thank President Xi!"
    1
  24459.  @aeoliaschenberg5880  Just 6 days to investigate and you already blame China? The investigation takes time and since there was no indication of human-to-human transmission, then why should China shut down our economy without proof? Only on 20th Jan 2020 was there actual confirmation of human-to-human transmission of coronavirus and that's when the government began implementing quarantine measures shortly after. Source: China confirms human-to-human transmission of new coronavirus aljazeera.com/news/2020/01/china-confirms-human-human-transmission-coronavirus-200120162507948.html (Dated to 21st Jan 2020) The government is acting based on information gleamed from the ground, not rumours and hearsay. And it was only Jan 20th that evidence of human-to-human transmission emerged so why blame China? The USA has had 3 months to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but what did USA do?
    1
  24460.  @aeoliaschenberg5880  Here's an article dating to 8th January 2020 and there was no evidence of human-to-human transmission. There is no evidence that the new virus is readily spread by humans, which would make it particularly dangerous, and it has not been tied to any deaths. But health officials in China and elsewhere are watching it carefully to ensure that the outbreak does not develop into something more severe. Source: China Identifies New Virus Causing Pneumonialike Illness nytimes.com/2020/01/08/health/china-pneumonia-outbreak-virus.html “We can assume that this virus transmissibility is not that high,” said Guan Yi, a professor of infectious diseases at the University of Hong Kong, who was part of a team that successfully identified the coronavirus that caused SARS. So even Hong Kong professor of infectious diseases and SARS expert, Dr Guan Yi, said that this virus transmissiblity is low. And this was in 8th Jan 2020.
    1
  24461.  @weimondo  What's the name of the Chinese Traditional Medicine that uses bat? Here's a list of Chinese Traditional Medicine and when has bat ever been used in TCM? Source: List of traditional Chinese medicine wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_traditional_Chinese_medicines
    1
  24462.  @weimondo  So what's your point then? Bat soup has already been debunked by experts. Source: Don’t Blame Bat Soup for the Coronavirus foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/27/coronavirus-covid19-dont-blame-bat-soup-for-the-virus/ Racist memes target Chinese eating habits, but the real causes of the virus are more mundane.
    1
  24463. +blister Michel Exactly. Every country have their own wages, their own cost of living relative to each other. so why begrudge Chinese for willing to work at a lower pay than Americans? Do Chinese people begrudge Zambia because their wages may be lower?
    1
  24464. +Taylor Sukoshi "America isn't perfect but compared to China... If America bombed my country I would stay and fight, look at Korea, Vietnam," China is not perfect too, but compared to America, China is currently at peace and not at war with any country since our last major war fought in 1979. Instead, China is the manufacturing hub of the world, making products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, clothing, sneakers, etc. But look at USA's involvement in Iraq war, Afghan War, Libyan War, etc, even in the 21st century? You will stay and fight for you country, then what about your wife, your kids, your grandparents? Why is USA even bombing your country in the first place? Is your country really such a threat to the USA? Also, you said earlier that "Now most of the world has access to cellphones unimaginable 20 years ago, Vaccines, Internet, cheap air travel..." Cellphones were very expensive half a century ago, when they first came out, but thanks to Chinese labor force, cellphone prices have lowered to become more affordable to the masses. Thanks to Chinese labor force, electronics and gadgets become cheaper and more affordable to the masses, and thus, more people have access to the Internet. Vaccines - The earliest hints of the practice of inoculation for smallpox in China come during the 10th century. Two reports on the Chinese practice of inoculation were received by the Royal Society in London in 1700; one by Dr. Martin Lister who received a report by an employee of the East India Company stationed in China and another by Clopton Havers.
    1
  24465. Even China took 4 decades to industrialize and build supply chains. How's Trump going to industrialize America in just 4 years?
    1
  24466. I thought Westerners usually think China's economy is overly dependent on manufacturing products cheaply, not banking. The fact that Chinese banks can make enormous loans shows that the government is not poor, so why are you claiming China is poor then, when Chinese banks are approving loans so easily?
    1
  24467. Cecilia Chen China can't surpass India in rocket science? China is the 3rd country in the world to independently send people to space, besides USA and USSR. In 2008, China conducted our very own "spacewalk" during Shenzhou-7 mission, where a Chinese astronaut left the interior of the spacecraft while in space and ventured into the vacuum of space. Video:China Shenzhou 7 Space Walk Live youtube.com/watch?v=gMxQEHfU6hM But has India sent anyone to space yet? Yet you look down on China's rocket science?
    1
  24468. Kushal Sarkar 有必要用英语吗？
    1
  24469.  @cchannel7857  Cyrus stated in his earlier email that he's been very busy lately, that's why he had a late response to CGTN. Then it's possible that Cyrus was too busy to discuss payment details, that's why the discussion was pushed back. It's not uncommon for payment details to be worked out later after the business transaction occurred, so what are you trying to say?
    1
  24470. +PRCseparatedChina Taiwan How is Kuomintang the rightful ruler of mainland China? During Chinese Civil War, the communists were mostly poorly trained peasants, had crappy equipment and lesser numbers, while the KMT were wealthy, had better equipment, better training, superior numbers, and yet KMT lost control of the mainland to communist peasants? This demonstrates gross incompetence on KMT's right to rule the mainland. On the other hand, the communists had only 50 members at the beginning of 1921, yet grew to become among the world's largest political parties today with over 80 million members and has turned mainland China from dirt-poor, starving, wartorn country into the to world's 2nd largest economy (whereas Taiwan is only ranked 22th) and has lifted millions out of poverty, while building the world's largest land army, People's Liberation Army, and is now an influential global political player. So how is CCP not qualified to rule China?
    1
  24471. +澳洲心型島上的Debby In the Taiwan midterm elections, the pro-independence DPP suffered a major loss, losing two of the island's most important posts in mayoral elections, and even the pro-independence Taiwan President Tsai herself resigned after this humiliating defeat. So doesn't it imply that majority of Taiwan people don't support independence, since they voted against Tsai?
    1
  24472. +ジョーさん The thing is, ordinary people are fickle, emotional, unable to vote responsibly, or just lack political awareness in general to make important decisions regarding the country's future. Why then, should ordinary people be allowed to vote and influence the course of their country's history? You people keep saying Taiwan people feel that they want independence, but where is your actual proof? All you people done is say "People of Taiwan want Independence!" without even quoting actual sources yourself. Whereas I've used polling results, to indicate the people of Taiwan's intentions. Also, the DPP hasn't seen actual combat before and is unlike the battle-hardened, politically experienced KMT of the past, that fought the communists during Chinese Civil War, and knows how to deal with cross-straits relations with the mainland. Why would the people of Taiwan trust an inexperienced government like DPP to declare independence and possibly provoke the mainland?
    1
  24473.  @myu5434  Taiwan was part of Qing Dynasty China, before Japanese occupied it for 50 years, and then the Kuomintang fled from the mainland into Formosa in 1949. So was Formosa part of China in Qing Dynasty? Map of Qing Dynasty China wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Qing_Dynasty_1820.png
    1
  24474. +creep in your garden at night staring at you But it was under Chinese rule, both in the past and even today. And most of the world has recognized the One China policy that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China.
    1
  24475. WeiZhang Very sad and disturbing video indeed.
    1
  24476.  @Tuxedo512  "bros grinding hard to get that social credit score up" As I've said previously, the so-called "Social Credit" system in China has been shown to be a myth that's all. Have you talked to any Chinese tourists or Chinese international students in your country? There's no such thing like what you've described, yet you're just propagating the myth.
    1
  24477.  @IlocaNomad  "ch… virtues like willing to speak out against injustice. Hmmm, you have that right in your country?" People in China have spoken out again a wide variety of perceived injustices, such as unpaid wages, compensation for land development, local environmental activism, and so on. Article 35 of the Chinese constitution states that citizens of the People's Republic of China shall enjoy freedom of speech, the press, assembly, association, procession and demonstration.
    1
  24478.  @AyupChuck  He's talking about why'd you bring up the myth that is the social credit system in China? Have you actually talked to any Chinese that has such a social credit score in the first place? Or are you just willing to propagate the myth of this system that's all.
    1
  24479. Western politicians only answer to their sponsors, so they do not see the need to be more open-minded.
    1
  24480. They answer only to their sponsors (i.e the miltary-industrial complex) , so Western politicians do not see the need to be more open minded about the cultures of non-Western countries.
    1
  24481. They answer only to their sponsors (i.e the miltary-industrial complex), so Western politicians do not see the need to be more open minded about other cultures.
    1
  24482.  @michaelkatz275  Russia did not start a war, they are putting an end to one that's been ongoing since the 2014 Maidan coup d'etat of President Yanukovych by the U.S and installing their own U.S puppet into Kiev. We even have audio evidence from the conversation between Victoria Nuland and Pyatt indicating that the U.S was behind this coup. You said: "Inflation, food and gas prices are small problems as compared to the war." Tell that to the ordinary Americans/Europeans having to pay increased food and gas prices for the sake of a country that isn't even in NATO and you can start to see the absurdity of the situation.
    1
  24483.  @michaelkatz275  Russia did not start a war, they are putting an end to one that's been ongoing since the 2014 coup d'etat of President Yanukovych by the U.S and installing their own puppet into Kiev. You said: "Inflation, food and gas prices are small problems as compared to the war." Tell that to the ordinary Americans/Europeans having to pay increased food and gas prices for the sake of a country that isn't even in NATO and you can start to see the absurdity of the situation.
    1
  24484. Scott Morrison must be crying inside at the events unfolding in Washington.
    1
  24485.  @MaxMax-to5ss  When Cyrus Janssen posts positive content on China, you anti-China people complain. When Cyrus Janssen posts negative content on the USA, you anti-China people also complain. Then what sort of content do you want? Those that feed your anti-China views?
    1
  24486.  @MaxMax-to5ss  But whenever Cyrus says positive things about China, you anti-China people complain about him being too positive, yet when he says negative things about the West, suddenly he's too negative? And he's currently living in Canada, not China, so how exactly do you expect him to talk about the two Canadians in China?
    1
  24487.  @mrshavartv  China seeks peaceful reunification, but China will not rule out that option.
    1
  24488.  @moneyking2540  Yes, that's part of China's Greater Bay Area plan to combine Shenzhen, Macau, Hong Kong, Guangzhou, etc into an economic hub, building innovation and finance powerhouse to rival US Silicon Valley and Japan's Tokyo Bay Area. Hopefully the development of neighbouring cities surrounding Hong Kong will help lift Hong Kong's economy up as well, hopefully making mainland governance seem attractive to people in Hong Kong.
    1
  24489. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24490.  @amy111  "Is it 100 years about Beijing and 10 years about Shanghai?" Read my post again, I said 100s of years (i.e centuries) for Beijing and 10s of years (i.e decades) for Shanghai. Not just 100 years and 10 years.
    1
  24491. It's the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of the West being overrun by Asians) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so thoroughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China surpassing the U.S someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    1
  24492. China has done much to develop African countries' infrastructure in just decades, compared to what Westerners have been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  24493. Doesn't Hollywood already have Asian representation from films from Chinese actors like Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Donnie Yen, Chow Yun Fatt, and other Chinese actors? And even if you consider the Marvel Cinematic Universe, isn't Wong from Doctor Strange an example of a Chinese representation?
    1
  24494.  @JTMsish  I guess that he's too young to know about previous Chinese actors like Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Donnie Yen, etc. The problem (or my problem at least) is with Simu Liu's remarks claiming that he's the first Asian hero and that finally Asians have representation in Hollywood, while discounting all those previous Chinese actors and the films that they starred in.
    1
  24495. China's dream is to make Asia strong, by building infrastructure in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh as well as in South Africa, like Angola, Djibouti, Kenya, etc. But Indian government always oppose Chinese road building in Kashmir and even Donglong/Doklam, which is not even Indian territory in the first place. Chinese government have stressed repeatedly that India is welcome to participate in Belt and Road Initiative, but Indian government doesn't want in, but in the end, China respect India's wishes if it doesn't want to join OBOR.
    1
  24496. +Smith During 1950s, Zhou Enlai proposed Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence 和平共处五项原则 to define the China-India relations. Zhou Enlai visited New Delhi four times, whereas PM Nehru only visited Beijing once, so who is being more sincere here? Nehru refused to sit down to negotiations, and instead pursued an aggressive "Forward" policy of building military bases at our disputed border, even extending beyond the international line and into actual Chinese territory. There were eventually 60 such outposts, including 43 north of the McMahon Line. +Sam D China does not force India to join in Belt and Road Initiative if it doesn't want to. As for US's approach to Pakistan, its goal is to invade Pakistan, just like what US did to Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and other Middle Eastern countries. The US approach to wiping out terrorism is to bomb those lands, which result many civilian casualties. Because of this, people become angry with USA, or their own government for letting US invade, so they flock join the terrorists instead and the whole cycle continues. For example, Al Qaeda is originally trained by CIA, but they rebelled against America and become terrorist. The rise of ISIS can also be attributed to US constant meddling in Middle Eastern countries. Whenever one terrorist group is exterminated, another one pops up to replace it, and therefore, this approach is short term and doesn't solve the problem of terrorism. China's approach is different from USA. People join terrorists groups because they are poor, unemployed, lacking in education or harbor resentment against USA or their own country's problems. So what China is doing, is helping to build up Pakistan's economy, so that more people find jobs and less people join terrorists. The terrorists will slowly find themselves with a shrinking pool of willing recruits, if the country's economy improves. This approach is long-term, and could hopefully solve/reduce the problem of terrorism, by making people less desperate to join the terrorists and is arguably better than USA spending money to bomb those countries instead. But of course it will take time to build up an entire country's economy and stabilize its government. This is not something that can be achieved at the snap of fingers, like USA ordering an invasion of Middle East. USA has been fighting wars in Middle East for 15 years, with not end in sight, so what makes you think their method is the best approach? Why not spend the money meant on investing to develop the country's infrastructure instead of wasting it on wars?
    1
  24497. +Sam D Are you sure India is self-reliant? Indian army still purchases weapons and military hardware from USA and Russia for defense so how is India self-reliant, when its defensive capabilities depends on these to countries continued support? Unless you can manufacture your own weapons and military, India wouldn't be able to act in its own interests when its defenses rely on imported hardware. Even if you claim that terrorism in Pakistan is because of state-support, it is primary because Pakistan views India as a threat which is why it wants to acquire weapons to defend itself. Remember that India supported Bangladesh independence from Western Pakistan, causing Pakistan to lose more of its territory, so it is constantly under further threat from India. Whether the threat is imagined or not, Pakistan feels that this threat is very real. There is nothing China can do about Pakistan's hostility towards India. Right now, Pakistan government is probably investing more money into the country's defense and its army, instead of its economy. What China hopes to achieve with CPEC is to develop Pakistan's economy, so that Pakistan government will be tempted to spend more on developing its growing economy, instead of on acquiring new weapons. Terrorism may be Pakistan's bargaining chip at the moment, but once CPEC is complete, and Pakistan's economy kicks off, then Pakistan government will begin to see more value in protecting its growing economy, and less value in maintaining terrorist assets (which serve to disrupt economic trade and create unrest that's all) India and Pakistan have already been fighting for 70 over years, so how long do you expect your countries to continue on like this? Imagine another 70 years later, and India and Pakistan still fighting each other, instead of mending relations long ago. CPEC is opportunity for both India and Pakistan to finally end their feud and to promote economic prosperity instead, and China would welcome any Indian support for CPEC. Once India and Pakistan economies become linked, it become harder for terrorists to attack such a link, knowing that it will also damage Pakistan's economy as well isn't it? Thus, the Pakistan government will become less likely to support terrorism in favor of promoting trade instead. Like I mentioned, you people only focus on short term issues and ignore the long term issues altogether. Pakistan has known no other way to make a living, except for extremist activities, so why not introduce it to economic trade instead?
    1
  24498. Nauru has recently cut all diplomatic ties with Taiwan island, and switched its recognition to mainland China.
    1
  24499. Do you have evidence that they got her family?
    1
  24500.  @eizyaws  Why are people jumping to conclusions that "they got her family" when there is no evidence to suggest such a thing?
    1
  24501.  @gbenay  "That half dead CCP old fart, drugged her, and raped her." That's a serious accusation, do you have evidence that she was drugged and raped? I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and she previously had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several years in fact, but where are the allegations of sexual assault in her post?
    1
  24502.  @gbenay  "She was drugged and raped that half dead looking old fart." I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and she actually known Zhang since seven years earlier before he became a politburo standing committee member. And from her words, the sex was consensual. Peng Shuai wrote: "Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well." So according to Peng Shuai's post, she consented to sex, then where are the allegations of sexual assault? And you even claimed she was drugged?
    1
  24503.  @TacticalMayo  轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  24504. There are so many small businesses emerging in China every day that it would be impossible to keep track of every single one. Besides, no one truly knows what's going to happen after reopening from lockdown. No other country has reopened after lockdown and China is literally paving the way to show what happens when lockdown is lifted.
    1
  24505. Who's evading whose questions? You clearly answered your own questions yourself. Why don't you answer my simple question of "If Trump were really so capable, then why didn't Kim just visit Washington straightaway, rather than come to Beijing?" Even the last time Washington and Pyongyang had a denuclearization talk, it was held in Beijing. Even the up coming talk is most likely to be held in Beijing as well. You Americans needs to wake up to the fact that if it weren't for China, USA and NK would just be trading names and testing missiles and slapping sanctions that's all.
    1
  24506.  @MarkYeung1  Russian is able to churn out missiles, artillery shells and tanks like pancakes, what makes you think the Russian military can't get a hold of the materials?
    1
  24507.  @MarkYeung1  "But Beijing's hostility approach towards Taiwanese people doesn't move towards peaceful reunification." What are you saying? Mainlanders literally regard the people of Taiwan as our brothers and sisters, it's in our education system that reunification is inevitable, so what hostility are you talking about? If anything, Beijing opposes the U.S House of Speakers Representative visiting Taiwan.
    1
  24508.  @MarkYeung1  NATO is most certainly not a defensive organization. Also, Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania joined NATO in 2004, not the 1990s, you've gotten your dates wrong.
    1
  24509.  @INTJ791  "And china mainland need to meet chinese who live overseas" I'm sure that everyone has heard of mainland Chinese tourists, visiting your countries and spending coin on the tourism industries. Even your schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers.
    1
  24510.  @covertpuppytwo7289  Why resort to hurling racist expletives by calling people egg-roll?
    1
  24511. @Sun Happy You know, German Chancellor Merkel was in power for 16 years (and would probably remain there longer if she ran for reelection) whereas President Xi Jinping been in power for only 8 years in comparison. Xi been in power for half the time that Merkel was, yet people are complaining about China's removal of term limits?
    1
  24512. @Sun Happy President Xi Jinping was elected by the Communist Party of China and since he's done a competent job of governing China, then can't he be allowed to remain in power?
    1
  24513. @Sun Happy About China's leader for life, China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US short term leadership.
    1
  24514. @Sun Happy "神州 Shenzhou Chinese media is controlled by CCP" And American media is controlled the rich U.S corporations. In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, reining in companies when they gone too far. Whereas in the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    1
  24515. @Sun Happy Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country, where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. When Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" ROC (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Chairman Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  24516.    China is donating medical supplies to other countries affected by Covid-19. Video: Jack Ma donates 500,000 coronavirus testing kits and 1,000,000 masks to the US youtu.be/t4it58bem6I Video: Chinese donate half a million masks to Italy to aid coronavirus fight youtu.be/tQQa7RUKXzs Video: Chinese donate 70,000 masks to Japan to aid coronavirus fight youtu.be/cYkYHauUmwo Video: 300,000 China-donated masks arrive in Belgium youtu.be/B0oxcoh9rDo
    1
  24517.  @caleblee1780  China has made significant advances in global technology since then. Merchant class is about making profit over anything else, and China will never allow the merchant class to take over the government. Today's merchants are the big corporations like Apple, Amazon, OpenAI, etc, and profit remains their motive, whereas China has found a balance between advancing technology as well as making lives better for the people. Take China's Deepseek AI chatbot for example, it costs a fraction of its counterpart ChatGPT, and the developers even made the code open source.
    1
  24518.  @caleblee1780  China has made significant advances in global technology since then. Merchant class is about making profit over anything else, and China will never allow the merchant class to supercede the government. Today's merchants are the big corporations like Apple, Amazon, OpenAI, etc, and profit remains their ultimate goal, whereas China has found a balance between advancing technology as well as making lives better for the people. Take China's Deepseek AI chatbot for example, it costs a fraction of its counterpart ChatGPT, and the developers even made it open source.
    1
  24519.  @caleblee1780  China has made significant advances in global technology since then. Merchant class is about making profit over anything else, and China will never allow the merchant class to supercede the government. Today's merchants are the big corporations like Apple, Amazon, OpenAI, etc, and profit remains their ultimate goal, whereas China has found a balance between advancing technology as well as making lives better for the people. Take China's Deepseek for example, it costs a fraction of its counterpart ChatGPT, and the developers even made it open source.
    1
  24520.  @caleblee1780  China has made significant advances in global tech since then, take Deepseek for example. It costs just a fraction of its western counterpart, ChatGPT, and it's developers even made it open source. Merchant class are concerned primarily with making profits, which is why China will never allow them to overthrow the government. Today's merchants are the big corporations that hold sway over governments, whereas China has found a balance between advancing technology as well as making lives better for the people. Take China's Deepseek for example, it costs a fraction of its western counterpart, and it's developers even made it open source.
    1
  24521.  @caleblee1780  Who says you can't use Google or YouTube while in China? Haven't you heard of Chinese vlogger Li Zi Qi? Her YouTube channel received the Guinness World Record for "The most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube." yet you think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Haven't you heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending coin in your country? Or of *Chinese international students studying in Western universities and learning the same topics as their local peers? In fact, China is the largest source of international tourists and international students, yet you claim the Chinese government is trying to keep the people ignorant? If anything, I think it's your government that's doing that to you, given how little you know about China.
    1
  24522.  @caleblee1780  Who says you can't use Google or YouTube while in China? Haven't you heard of Chinese vlogger Li Zi Qi? Her YouTube channel received the Guinness World Record for "The most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube." yet you think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Haven't you heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending coin in your country? Or of *Chinese international students studying in Western universities and learning the same topics as their local peers? In fact, China is the largest source of international tourists and international students, yet you claim the Chinese government is trying to keep the people ignorant?
    1
  24523.  @caleblee1780  Haven't you heard of Chinese vlogger Li Zi Qi? Her YouTube channel received the Guinness World Record for "The most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube." yet you think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Haven't you heard of Chinese tourists visiting your lands and spending coin in your country? Or of *Chinese international students studying in Western universities and learning the same topics as their local peers? In fact, China is the largest source of international tourists and international students.
    1
  24524.  @caleblee1780  You said: "There is no freedom for art and self expression in china." Are you serious? China's arts scene is vibrant, multifaceted, and continually evolving, blending traditional heritage with contemporary innovation and global engagement. Traditional Chinese arts like Chinese calligraphy, mountain-landscape paintings, porcelain (also known as "fine china") and traditional opera such as Peking Opera have ongoing efforts to preserve and promote these art forms while infusing modern elements to keep them relevant. Chinese traditional music, traditional dances, traditional clothing are fashion are promoted. Ever heard of the Chinese Hanfu? It's an ongoing movement where people wear the traditional Han clothing of long sleeves and flowing robes, with beautiful hairstyles decorated with intricate hairpins. Same goes for Chinese historical dramas, Kung Fu/martial arts novels, Chinese poetry, and so on. Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  24525.  @caleblee1780  According to report from the non-profit International Publishers Association, China produced 470,000 new book titles while the United States churned out just under 339,000, so what makes you think you can't read books while in China? Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  24526.  @caleblee1780  YouTube is so "free" that they literally deleted your last comment. (sarcasm)
    1
  24527.  @andyc3012  "Shenzhou. Blah blah blah... You are just spewing what US Supremists spew about the USA-.-" Excuse me but when did I ever say anything like that about the USA? Are you reading the right comments?
    1
  24528.  @andieisabella  Not enough land on Earth to feed the world population? Then why not make more land available? Like I said earlier, China can support 20% of world's population with just 7% arable land, and China has been combating desertification and converting deserts into crop fields. Video: How China transformed its desert into a fruit growing oasis youtube.com/watch?v=BepMqZ4pFXQ Video: World's largest man-made forest in Saihanba, China youtube.com/watch?v=3RqsUD6fyGk
    1
  24529.  @andieisabella  Because China has so little arable land, Chinese farmers ingeniously cut terraces into hills to create level terrain to grow rice. Some farmers even raise fish side by side with rice crops, and the fish eat insects in the water and fish manure helps keep the soil fertile, and the fishes themselves may serve as food. China: Growing rice, raising fish for food and livelihood security youtube.com/watch?v=ejP1VflTZ4A Chinese farmers have faced the problem of food security for centuries. Some fish farmers cultivate silkworms beside carp, and silkworm pupae (rich in protein) are fed to the fish and also used to fertilise mulberry plants that silkworm feed upon. Video: Sustainable seafood and integrated fish farming in China youtube.com/watch?v=18xyR8KWrgE
    1
  24530. The Dalai Lama was actually a CIA agent, receiving funds (A total of $1,735,000) from US government to train Tibetan guerrillas to oppose the communist government in Tibet. But the fact is USA did not truly care about so-called Tibetan independence. Source: Wikipedia: CIA Tibetan program
    1
  24531. The CIA's involvement in Tibet was never focused on it becoming independent from China but to gain intelligence on them and fight communism. In his 1991 autobiography Freedom in Exile, the 14th Dalai Lama criticized the CIA for supporting the Tibetan independence movement "not because they (the CIA) cared about Tibetan independence, but as part of their worldwide efforts to destabilize all communist governments". The DL also claimed that the CIA Tibetan program had been harmful for Tibet because it was primarily aimed at serving American interests, and "once the American policy toward China changed, they stopped their help" This is supported by the fact that once US President Nixon visited China in 1972, America stopped caring about Tibetan's independence. Today, Tibet is recognized as part of China by countries all over the world, including USA. Nobody brings up the topic of Tibetan independence to China during all those UN summits and meetings.
    1
  24532. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24533. trump wants to achieve US industrialization in just 4 years, when it took China 40 years to become a manufacturing hub.
    1
  24534. Why everything I say amounts to me being 50c or spewing Chinese propaganda? My personal opinion is that "war is no good for our countries and will hurt our growing economies." yet most of you people reply with insults and ridicule me for this sentiment? There are some people posing as Chinese and being sexist against women, ridiculing other peoples cultures and so on, but most Chinese just want live life peacefully with our neighbors, but it is difficult, since Japan has invaded China multiple times, since 400 years ago. Both North Korea and Pakistan are nuclear-capable states, so we don't want push them over the edge. Russia is only our ally when USA is involved, otherwise they compete with us for resources and territories. We need large PLA army to defend our lands, but people still regard us suspiciously, even when USA is world's biggest military spender.
    1
  24535. When did the government provide ICBMs to Arab countries? China has infrastructure projects in many countries, including Pakistan, Kazakhstan, other -stan countries, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, and also African countries like Nigeria, Angola, etc. Are these projects all disputed by other countries?
    1
  24536. Aniruddh Joshi China is building roads in Pakistan in economic corridor project. Pakistan is sovereignty state as recognised by India, so it is bilateral (country to country) affair between China and Pakistan. If India object to Chinese building there, then why don't India send its troops there to obstruct road construction, like it is doing now in Donglong? Our government has made multiple repeated requests for Indian government withdrawal of troops from our territory.
    1
  24537. Singh is king The government has produced maps and evidence in the form of 1890 treaty (Convention of Calcutta) to support our claim to Donglong. What evidence has Bhutanese government produced to show for its claims? Mehardeeputssyd Singh Why insult Chinese people eyes and abuse me with racial slurs? What has Pakistan got to do with this topic at all? China is helping develop the economies of Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh to make them more prosperous. Does India want these countries remain poor forever and completely reliant on India? The government only suspend Indian pilgrims from visiting Kailash temporarily, because of Indian troops suddenly entering Chinese territory. Once India withdraw its troops from our territory, the roads will be reopen to Indian pilgrims.
    1
  24538. +Adityaa Chaubey Exactly what do you know of the Chinese army? PLA is among one of world's most disciplined forces in the world, tolerating even 2 months of Indian troops presence within our territory in Donglong. On the other hand, Indian army has been associated with cases of rape. For example, Indian Peacekeeping Forces in Sri Lanka were accused of raping Tamils in Sri Lanka and committing various atrocities. During the Kashmir conflict, rape has been used as a weapon of war by Indian security forces; comprising the Indian Army, against the Kashmiri population. These are reports gleamed from Wikipedia and other sources, and its no secret that Indian army has a poor reputation because of this unfortunate history. India has treaty with Bhutan, but Bhutanese government doesn't have evidence to support its claim to Donglong, so how is it justified for India to send its troops into Chinese territory? I keep asking: "Where is Bhutanese government proof of ownership?" How is building a road changing the status quo? Prior to 1998, Donglong was under Chinese control, but claimed by Bhutan. Currently, Donglong is still under Chinese control, but claimed by Bhutan. Exactly what part of the status quo has changed? All you do is ridicule and look down on me, when you don't even produce reliable evidence of your own. You dismiss every evidence China produces, yet support Bhutan when it does not have any proof of its own. It only goes to show your double standards being applied against Chinese people and our government.
    1
  24539. +Adityaa Chaubey I have already mentioned that China follows 1890 treaty, but people like you continue to belittle me and mock me, even when I produced evidence and you haven't done such thing. *Indian government even accepted the treaty in 1900s according to ( lib.utexas.edu/maps/topo/india_253k/txu-pclmaps-oclc-181831961-darjeeling-78-a-1923.jpg ) which shows the trijunction point at Gipmochi under the Index of Districts section at the bottom right. During that incident, some PLA troops refused to fire upon our own people, so the casualty rate was smaller than it should be. There are even reports that PLA troops got beaten up by crowds without firing off a shot in return. The Nanjing Massacre is grotest atrocity commited by Japanese forces that invaded China to rape our women. What do you know of PLA army's efforts to defend China?
    1
  24540. +Adityaa Chaubey​ I have evidence that Indian government accept the treaty as shown in my previous link. Why do you ignore my links and assume Chinese government have no proof? Does Bhutan government even have proof of its claims to Donglong? There was never any mention of Donglong at all in 1988 and 1998 treaty. All is agreed is that the status quo should remain. Donglong was part of China before those treaties so how has the status quo been changed when China still controls Donglong? Furthermore, if you claim India does not accept British treaty, then why does India accept 1914 Shimla accord and the McMahon line? It was British treaty not Indian treaty isn't it?
    1
  24541. Adityaa Chaubey Watch International News and a fair amount of them said Indian troops are in territory that India itself does not claim as its own. It has been labelled as affair between China and Bhutan so why India send troops to this territory in first place? The government is giving India plenty of time to choose to withdraw its troops from our territory. We are not the type to rush into war just because Indian troops trespass into our territory because misunderstanding. Chinese government already sent two notices to India informing them prior to our construction activities in Donglong. But Indian government ignored our notices and remained silent. If India objected to our road construction, why not try more diplomatic channels first, instead of sending troops into our territory without clarification? ( thehindu.com/news/international/chinese-defence-ministry-meets-visiting-indian-media-at-the-height-of-doklam-crisis/article19445902.ece )
    1
  24542. Mohit Khanna If Indians don't want war with China, then the peaceful solution is obvious. Simply withdraw Indian troops from Chinese territory, then our government will proceed with negotiations normally, and war will be avoided. If Indian government wants, it can participate as neutral observer, instead obviously taking sides here. Straits of Malaca under Malaysian and Singaporean control. Will these countries support war or blockade of goods within their territory? 90% of Chinese goods go to USA and Europe, so will those countries take kindly to cutting off supply of Chinese goods from the East? China has used diplomatic channels such as notifying Indian government prior to our activities in Donglong which India ignored. What diplomatic channels has India done before sending troops to Chinese territory?
    1
  24543. +Aniruddh Joshi According to this source (web.archive.org/web/20021024231629/http://www.bhutannewsonline.com/bhutan_china.html ) "During this round of talk, Bhutan had extended the claim line of the border beyond what the Chinese government had offered.... His Majesty the King told the National Assembly of Bhutan on 14 July, 2001 that the proposed extension of the border along the three sectors under discussion were in Doglam, Sinchulumba, and Dramana areas." So Bhutan had extended their claim line beyond China into Doglam. +Adityaa Chaubey First of all, I quoted evidence to support my claim, but all you done is dismiss them entirely. Then you refuse to explain why Bhutan claims Doklam, or why India shift the tri-junction to Batang La without Chinese consultation or approval. There is no formal agreement that Batang La is the trijunction, however, there exists formal agreement where Mount Gipmochi is stated as the tri-junction. Lastly, I do not insult you for your views, whereas you have been mocking and belittling me constantly. You agreed that " Chinese are an inferior race. China is a disease which needs to be treated. They are robbers who are stealing everything, be it technology or neighbour's land." so who are you to mock Chinese people and our inventions? Chinese people invented many inventions, namely paper, printing, compass, gunpowder etc. Thanks to paper and printing, knowledge gets recorded and passed down, and compass enabled explorers to map out the world. Gunpowder has also revolutionized warfare as we know today. Yet you call us Chinese a disease which needs to be treated? You are despicable person who knows absolutely nothing about Chinese people and constantly belittle us.
    1
  24544. +Adityaa Chaubey I have mentioned in my post the section where Bhutan had extended the claim line of the border beyond to include Doglam. This means that Bhutan had initially recognized it as being part China, but choose to extend its claims beyond into Donglong, thinking that Bhutan being a small country and China being a very large and friendly neighbor would solve the issue quickly. This article (ecns.cn/voices/2017/08-03/267944_2.shtml ) by US scholar Jon Taylor, a professor of political science at University of St Thomas, Houston, said the Indian military breached both international law and treaty convention by entering Chinese territory shortly after their Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited the U.S. The end of the article also says "The U.S. has not taken a side so far. State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauertsaid on July 18 that the U.S. is concerned about the ongoing situation there, saying both sides should work together to try to come up with some better sort of arrangement for peace." This Japanese article shows that Japanese embassy denied Hiramatsu ever outrightly stating support for India. Original: (sp.m.jiji.com/generalnews/article/genre/intl/id/1875970 ) Translated version: (translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?act=url&depth=1&hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ja&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=http://sp.m.jiji.com/generalnews/article/genre/intl/id/1875970&usg=ALkJrhhAC3zhBHvhpDG7Pb0rR1B0putiOA ) Lastly, USA's and UK's trade practices have nothing to do with China and Bhutan's territorial claims. Bhutan doesn't even maintain diplomatic relations with USA or UK, so why would they support Bhutan's claims? Where is Bhutan's evidence to even show for its claims at all? There is no maps, or treaties etc, referencing Doklam as belonging to Bhutan. Bhutan doesn't maintatin diplomatic relations with any of the UNSC permanent five members, including Russia and France. It is unlikely that these countries will support Bhutan's territorial claim, over China's.
    1
  24545. +Adityaa Chaubey Actually, Chinese media says that PLA will continue to patrol the territory, while Indian MEA says Indian troop withdrawal almost complete. So at least some PLA troops will be remaining behind in Donglong. But still, congratulations to peaceful end of the standoff.
    1
  24546. Adityaa Chaubey Actually, Chinese government suspended road construction primarily because of worsening weather conditions with the onset of winter in Donglong (thehindu.com/news/international/china-side-steps-issue-of-road-construction-in-doklam/article19581244.ece ) and also probably with the upcoming BRICS summit in China. Once that is over, who knows if the government will continue road works next year when winter ends? China has also offered Bhutan $10 billion dollars in economic aid, so if Bhutan happens to accept this offer, then I am sorry to disappoint India if the government renews construction in Doklam/Donglong. Construction has stopped for now, but not forever.
    1
  24547. +Adityaa Chaubey From your quotes, Wang Dehua said "... puts the construction on hold." there is no mention of stopping construction entirely. Who is to say it won't continue next year or so? According to my previous source, Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying said: "We will take into consideration all factors, including weather, to make revelant construction plans according to the ground." So only next year after end of winter, will we find out if the government will continue building the road. By then conditions would have changed. As for Bhutan, it has been spooked by India possibly dragging both Bhutan and India into possible war with China over a territorial dispute. What makes you certain they will ask for India's help the next time? If Bhutan accepts Chinese economic aid, it has a chance to become less dependent on India for aid, and could even lead to establishment of diplomatic relations between our countries, which India has been trying to oppose. Bhutan is its own sovereign country, so it should be allowed to make its own decisions independently of Indian influence.
    1
  24548. +Adityaa Chaubey ANI news network is Indian news network so why is it even reliable at all? Bhutan almost got dragged into a war with China because of India, so you think Bhutan will call upon India for help again? China was busy hosting the BRICS summit so the Doklam/Donglong issue has been shelved aside. China has settled boundary dispute approximately of 20,000 km with 12 countries out of the 22,000 km and is yet to settle about 2,000 km of boundary involving India and Bhutan. -In 1961, Nepal and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1991, USSR and China signed Sino-Soviet border agreement. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border agreement. -In 2011, Tajikistan ratified a 1999 deal to cede 1,000 km2 of land to China and China also cede over 28,000 km2 of Tajikistani territory. China has had 21 talks with Bhutan and 19 talks with India but we still can't solve this border issue, despite solving land disputes with all our land neighbors. You claim that I have to watch Indian news, yet you keep dimissing all my sources that are in Chinese, then whats to point of providing sources? You keep dismissing my sources just because its Chinese and I can't do the same to your sources which are Indian? If China cut down any existing ties with Bhutan then why did China have 21 talks with Bhutan at all? China blocked India's entry into NSG because it didn't sign non-proliferation treaty. India also needs the approval of 8 other countries in NSG before it can be admitted.
    1
  24549. +Aniruddh Joshi In 1960s, Zhou Enlai proposed Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence 和平共处五项原则 to define China-India relationship, but Indian PM Nehru snubbed Zhou and refused to sit down to negotiations to settle our borders. Instead, Nehru pursued an aggressive "Forward" policy of building military bases at our disputed border and even went beyond the international line into Chinese territory. So Chinese government had no choice but to defend our sovereignty, if Nehru did not want to talk things peacefully. All of the above taken from Henderson Brooks–Bhagat Reportt by Neville Maxwell, which has been banned by Indian government for over 50 years since 1962. If Bhutan claim its their territory, then where is evidence to show that the territory belongs to them? Bhutan did not produce evidence such as maps, treaties, etc, to support its territorial claims, so what makes it valid Bhutanese territory? And Bhutan-Indian treaty did not say Bhutan can use Indian army to support its territorial claims.
    1
  24550. +Adityaa Chaubey This article outlines the reasons for 1962 conflict. (web.archive.org/web/20090326032121/http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~johnston/garver.pdf ) Here are excerpts from the above source: -Zhou Enlai during his April 1960 visit to India, proposed China drop its claims in the eastern sector in exchange for India dropping its claims in the western sector. Such a swap would have given each side legal right to territory already in its possession and most important to each nation’s security. Nehru rejected the swap proposal and insisted that China abandon its claim in the east and withdraw from Aksai Chin in the west. -Three rounds of border talks were held in 1960 following two visits by Zhou to India. (Zhou visited India four times, while his counterpart Nehru visited China only once.) -Mao proposed a withdrawal of 20 kilometers. If India was unwilling to do this, Mao suggested, China would unilaterally withdraw. Thus, Chinese forces were ordered to withdraw 20 kilometers from what China felt was the line of actual control, and to cease patrolling in that forward zone. Tension declined for 23 months. -Indian forces were ordered to “push forward.” When Indian forces initially began implementing the Forward Policy, Chinese forces withdrew when they encountered the newly advanced Indian outposts. This “encouraged” the Indian side and led to the further acceleration of the Forward Policy. -Chinese discovered withdrawing was pointless and causing us to lose ground. Chinese border forces also abandoned their initial policy of withdrawing when encountering new Indian posts. Chinese forces began standing their ground. -In April 1962 India accelerated implementation of the Forward Policy in the eastern sector. 60 More Indian posts were built on commanding heights near existing PLA outposts, and aerial and ground reconnaissance was increased -Zhou Enlai directed China’s representative, foreign minister and former veteran General Chen Yi, to seek out India’s representative, Defense Minister Krishna Menon, and urge him to find ways of preventing the border situation from further deteriorating. -Chen asked Menon what ideas the “honorable Indian government” had about solving the Sino-Indian border problem? Menon replied that, in India's view, there was no border problem between China and India. The location of the boundary was very clearly displayed on Indian maps. This message was conveyed in an arrogant tone of voice. Chen Yi then said that Indian forces were steadily advancing into Chinese territory, and could it be that the Indian representative did not know this? Menon replied that the movements of Indian troops were taking place on Indian territory. -Chen proposed that he and Menon issue a joint communiqué announcing future talks on the "problem of preventing border conflict." Menon declined this proposal. ... ... You can read the text for more information. It was because of these reasons which was why China was reluctantly forced to declare war on India.
    1
  24551. +Adityaa Chaubey As you can see, there are lots of people pose as Chinese going around insulting Indians, so how can you really be be sure that such people represent ordinary Chinese people? Regarding Sino-Indian War in 1962, how exactly did China trick India into going into a war? Mao Zedong ordered retreat of PLA troops and proposed 20KM demilitarized zone and stuck to it. PM Nehru saw Chinese retreat as weakness, and moved Indian Army to fill up our vacated territory. Nehru also refused to discuss the issue, and pursued aggressive "Forward" policy building military bases at our disputed border. China attacked India to threaten USA and Soviet? Exactly how do you arrive at this conclusion? According to the source, part of the reason China ended the war, was because USA was preparing to join in. The government only acted to defend Chinese sovereignty and to stop Indian intrusion into our lands, when Nehru is continuing to build over 60 military bases at our disputed border. You claim China tricked Nehru with "mind game" but can you elaborate why you think so? Zhou Enlai visited New Delhi 4 times, but Nehru only visited Beijing once. China and India has had 19 talks over our border dispute, but failed to solve the issue, so how else do you expect to solve this problem, if you refuse to talk? The government has proposed a deal where China cedes Aksai Chin to India, in exchange for Tawang of Aruanchal Pradesh. The government doesn't really claim entirety of Arunachal Pradesh, only Tawang region for its significance to Tibet. According to Chinese diplomat, Dai Bingguo even the British colonialists who drew the 'McMahon Line' respected China's jurisdiction over Tawang. China ready to make concessions in Aksai Chin if India cedes part of Tawang in Arunachal Pradesh? zeenews.india.com/india/china-ready-to-make-concessions-in-aksai-chin-if-india-cedes-part-of-tawang-in-arunachal-pradesh_1982943.html Otherwise, how else do you propose we solve our border dispute? China and India has had 19 talks and two armed conflicts, but no resolution to this matter. If you continue to blame everything as China's fault, then it is unlikely that this matter is going to be resolved any time soon.
    1
  24552. Whether Prodigy Spot is actually Indian or Pakistan or Chinese, what he says is his own personal opinion, so why fault him for his opinions? You mean to say actual Indians can't have their own opinions about themselves? +Adityaa Chaubey Your comment about my name Shenzhou already shows your ignorance. The "Shenzhou" you are referring to is a spacecraft, not a missile and it was used to launch China's first astronauts into space as part of China's space program, making China the 3rd nation in world to have successfully conducted manned space missions, aside from USA and Russia. You calling it a "missile" only shows that you lack of knowledge about the subject at all, and is ironic, considering that India hasn't yet conducted a manned space mission of its own. The words Shenzhou 神舟 means "Divine Ark" and is a homonym and play on my name Shenzhou 神州 meaning "Divine Land" which is one of the ancient literary names of China, sort of like how Bharata is ancient name for India. The name "Divine Land" conjures images of my homeland's beautiful landscape; pillar-like mountain with snow-capped peaks and cascading waterfalls, mysteriously shrouded with mist, with jade green bamboo forests and vast fields of rice with their mirror-like surfaces reflecting the sky above. Just search images of "China mountain" to see what I mean. My name Shenzhou, represents China, as a glorious and ancient civilization with our own rich history and culture, that has also modernized to become a world power today, capable of launching people into space. Who are you to claim that "Shenzhou is the name of a Chinese missile"? Shenzhou Program en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shenzhou_program Indians like you only know how to blame China all the time for the border disputes. You claimed "India was tricked by China into a war" and "China playing mind game" but you failed to elaborate further, so how do you expect me to believe your claims? Do you have any source to back up your claims? You even claim "China attacked attacked India just to threaten the US and the Soviets" when there is no reason to believe so. How does China attacking India link to US and Soviet at all?
    1
  24553. +Adityaa Chaubey Why don't you even read your own source first? According to your source: These two sentences that mention US and Soviets -The Nehru administration was encouraged by the US and the Soviets to fight against China. -Chinese leader Mao Zedong believed the battle with India was also a political combat, and the real target was not Nehru but the US and the Soviets that had been plotting behind the scenes against China. So it was evident that India was under US and Soviet control to fight against China. Mao Zedong said that the war was also a political combat, meaning that in addition to defending our lands, it was also political combat against US and Soviet. But how is that physically a war with US and Soviet? Did Chinese troops fought any Russians or Americans during Sino-Indian war? Also, the rest of your source shows that China did not want to fight India, and was only reacting to India's aggressive actions. -China initially tried to avoid military confrontation, out of respect to India's ancient culture and sympathy that it had suffered a similar painful past of oppression by colonial powers. However, India's persistent provocation eventually breached China's bottom-line, and the People's Liberation Army (PLA) was forced to join the battle in self-defense. -The PLA decisively halted its military operation and pulled back its troops. China's decision to fight back against India in the 1962 border war was to strike a peace with its neighbor. -While fighting with the Indian troops, China constantly urged the Indian government to end the conflicts and solve the border issue on the negotiating table. -China's peaceful intentions were further testified by its unilateral ceasefire on November 22, 1962, and its withdrawal of troops a few days later to 20 kilometers from the line of actual control since November 7, 1959. -Mao gave India room to maneuver and think during the war. By calling for a unilateral ceasefire when in an advantageous position, pulling back troops and returning prisoners of war and well-maintained weapons to India, Mao wanted to send a message of peace to India, and to lay a good foundation for long-term friendship. So exactly how is "China tricking India into a war" here? How is China playing "mind games" when Mao offered plenty of opportunities to return to the discussion table, instead of continuing with the fight? Nehru chose to pursue his aggressive "Forward" policy of building military bases, and did not want to negotiate with China peacefully. Even in one of my previous source, China is willing to cede Aksai Chin to India in exchange for Tawang of Arunachal Pradesh, but India rejected this proposal still, so which country is being difficult here? Lastly, you continuing to label Shenzhou as an Aircraft is just further showing you unrepentant ignorance. Shenzhou is China's first manned space mission, allowing China to join the ranks of USA and Russia as countries who have launched successful manned missions. Who are you to simply call it a missile or even an aircraft? Can an Aircraft reach above the stratosphere into orbit? You Indians don't even have any "spacecraft" of your own, and that's why you ignorantly call it an aircraft. I don't insult your name or anything like that, so why do you insult mine? You are the one first brought up issue of Shenzhou being a missile into this discussion. Regarding China's land disputes, China has settled boundary dispute approximately of 20,000 km with 12 countries out of the 22,000 km and is yet to settle about 2,000 km of boundary involving India and Bhutan. -In 1961, Nepal and China signed border agreement. -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1991, USSR and China signed Sino-Soviet border agreement. -In 1992, Laos and China signed border agreement. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border agreement. -In 2011, Tajikistan ratified a 1999 deal to cede 1,000 km2 of land to China and China also cede over 28,000 km2 of Tajikistani territory. China has 21 talks with Bhutan and 19 talks with India but still fail to settle our countries borders. So why is it China can settle disputes with all our land neighbors except for Bhutan and India here?
    1
  24554. Adityaa Chaubey The Diaoyu Islands were initially Chinese territory, before Japan occupied them and stole them from China during the war. After Japanese signed WW2 surrender treaty in 1945, Japan pledged to give up all its occupied territory, so shouldn't Diaoyu islands be rightfully returned to China? China claims South China Sea Islands under 9 dash line. North Vietnam leader Phan Van Dong had acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese. When Philippines became independent, it drew its national boundaries and did not include Scarborough Shoals or other islands west of Philippines as within its national boundaries. Because of this, China assumed nobody is disputing Chinese claims to South China Sea Islands, but slowly in 1970s, those countries began encroaching into Chinese territory. There were various treaties governing South China Sea dispute, but what makes you think other countries claims are correct over China's claims? Since India is not a claimant to any of those islands, it should remain as neutral observer, instead obviously taking sides in this dispute. Regarding Aksai Chin, you mentioned Nehru's claims in the 1940s but do you know exactly when? China was still under KMT (ROC) control until 1949, when PRC was founded so perhaps you were referring to the previous Chinese administration? China lost Tibet in 1912 and regained control in 1951 but China was not planning to invade India. Tibet was historically part of China but India wasn't and China only claimed territory that was Qing dynasty's right up to 1912. As mentioned in your source, even if you believe China was going to war, Mao gave Nehru plenty of time to maneuver, such as retreating to 20 KM demilitarized zone and attempting to get Nehru back to negotiating tables instead. But Nehru refused and continued building military bases at our disputed border. Like I quoted earlier, India had about 60 such bases so it was not just a few bases at one time. Why not take the option to discuss things instead of building more bases? Lastly, this is my post, started by me to express my opinions, and you people are the ones coming here to comment. Nobody is forcing you to write comments if you don't want to, but what right does that give you to stop me posting? This is my post and I have cited sources to support my claims so what am I doing wrong here? Who is the one doubting other people's identity and mocking other people's names?
    1
  24555. Adityaa Chaubey You called me stubborn, said I will never give up and that this discussion meaningless and will go on forever. Then I could also say the same thing about you. You keep on dismissing my sources simply because they are "Chinese" so why should I believe anything you say? Who is the one in denial about Nehru's aggressive "Forward" policy here and simply blame everything on China? I have given China's view towards South China Sea Islands, but instead of attacking them you just claim other countries rejected them, that's all? Shouldn't Japan relinquish control of Diaoyu islands? Why is Vietnam justified in going against its own wording? You are simply biased against China and will side with any other country, as long as it opposes China, so what makes you justified here? At least I provided points here but you just simply deny them that's all. In 1947, China was still under previous administration (ROC). Also, Zhou Enlai became Premier in 1949, so how can you claim he agreed to Nehru's claim in 1947? You are simply making up lies to justify your biased views towards China that's all. Nehru was democratically voted in by Indian people so its your peoples choice to choose someone with poor decision-making and easily deceived to represent india. China had nothing to do with Nehru's election and we treated Nehru with respect befitting India's historical culture. Mao thought India would make good ally against the Western Colonial powers (as shown in your source) but USA and Russia manipulated Nehru into opposing China and straining our potential relations. Our countries has had no great conflicts throughout history, prior to Sino-Indian war and we could have become allied powers against Western colonialism if things were different. As a leader, Nehru also should have fought harder for India not to be partitioned in 1947 by British and for India to remain independent with all the territories of British India intact. Much of India's political problems stem from the partitioning. In my opinion, India should not have given up its own territory to form Pakistan. Once Pakistan is independent, India can no longer control it and it may grow to become thorn in India's side (as it is now) India also supported Bangladesh independence from West Pakistan, creating another independent country. Each separation weakens the original country. This is why China fight so hard to retain control of Hong Kong and Taiwan. We don't want end up like India and Pakistan, and keep on fighting each other even till today, while British secretly laughing in the background. India's leaders like Nehru were soft and because of this, other countries leaders will step all over your country. Even Gandhi while non-violent in his approach, was taken advantage of by Britain and in the end he was assassinated by Hindu nationalist who felt that the partition was unjust.
    1
  24556. +Adityaa Chaubey China wanted to befriend India too. Remember that Zhou Enlai proposed Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence 和平共处五项原则 to define China-India relationship? Both Pakistan and India were among the first countries to recognize PRC in UN, over ROC, but in the end, PM Nehru sowed the first seeds of suspicion among Chinese, by providing asylum to 14th Dalai Lama, during Tibet uprising in 1959. The 14th Dalai Lama was traitor who worked with CIA in separatist movements against the government, and CIA aided his escape to India. The issue between 14th Dalai Lama and China should be internal Chinese affair, but PM Nehru provided asylum to 14th DL, and because of that, China no longer had reason to believe any good intentions of India. Even in the events leading up to the war, Mao Zedong withdrew the PLA 20KM, and proposed demilitarized zone, but Nehru continued his aggressive "Forward" Policy. This gives China the impression that India wants control of Tibet, since India already has 14th DL in its possession. This action taken by India, was perhaps the starting point of the deterioration of relations between India and China, and because of this, China choose to developed better relations with Pakistan instead. At that time, China was under civil war, so which China (Communists or Nationalists) are you referring to? Neither side of China were invited to sign the Treaty of San Fransico, but the Western powers proceeded with the signing without China's input. As a result, China is not one of the 48 countries that signed treaty of San Fransisco, as shown in the following source Treaty of San Francisco en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_San_Francisco#Signatories_and_ratification As for Vietnam, the North Vietnam leader Phan Van Dong had sent a diplomatic letter to Zhou Enlai in 1958, acknowledging that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese. But they broke their word, and slowly began encroaching into Chinese territory. 1958 Diplomatic note from Phan Van Dong to Zhou Enlai. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg How is the Chinese being aggressive in 1950s? As I said, Zhou Enlai visited New Delhi 4 times, whereas PM Nehru visited Beijing only once. You think Nehru's Forward policy is not being aggressive here? Also, why would a supposedly "aggressive" PLA pull back to 20 KM, whereas Indian army didn't, and even proceeded to build military bases beyond the border into actual Chinese territory? You are unfair in that you label all Chinese actions as "aggressive" when Chinese diplomats were visiting India to attempt to solve the border issue diplomatically. The partition of India resulted in death of many traveling migrants. Also the subsequent wars between Pakistan and India created much bloodshed. Jinah probably had some vision that he wanted to achieve for Pakistan, but he died early, and then Pakistan was left headless and without direction, and instinctively lashed out at its foster nation India. The fact that India supported Bangladesh against Pakistan, further causes Pakistan to lose more territory of its own. But that's all in the past, and today, Pakistan is its own sovereign nation as recognized by India, and it deserves a shot at its own success. Pakistan does consider India a threat (whether real or imagined) because India had caused Pakistan to lose control of Bangladesh. Why not attempt mend relations, instead of promoting conflict? China is helping develop Pakistan through CPEC, and this represents rare golden opportunity for India and Pakistan to cooperate economically, instead of opposing each other. Pakistan and India already been fighting each other for almost 70 years, so why continue promoting this conflict?
    1
  24557. +Adityaa Chaubey According to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peaceful_coexistence#Chinese_policy "Premier Zhou Enlai of the People's Republic of China proposed the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence in 1954 during negotiations with India over Tibet and these were written into the Agreement Between the People's Republic of China and the Republic of India on Trade and Intercourse Between the Tibet Region of China and India signed in 1954 by Zhou and Prime Minister of India Jawaharlal Nehru. So why is it untrue that the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence weren't put forward by Zhou Enlai? You are just trying to twist the words to make it sound like India somehow came up with it. As for Bara Hoti, according to following source, Hoti was popular among Indian traders going to Tibet and was part of Tibetan territory, since Tibetans had once established a customs post there. In 1890, the British government had it removed and in 1952, the Tibetans replaced it. You can see that Hoti was claimed by Tibet before 1890 when British removed the outpost suddenly. In the 1954 Panchsheel Agreement on trade and pilgrimage in Tibet, India forfeited all its rights in Tibet, so how is Bara Hoti constituted as part of Indian territory now? It is part of Tibet and called Wu-Je. The Chinese also protested about armed Indian troops having crossed the Niti pass on 29 June 1954, so its not as though Indian troops haven't been crossing into our territory as well. firstpost.com/india/whether-bara-hoti-or-doklam-india-must-resist-all-china-advances-on-ground-learn-from-history-3881263.html What do you even know about the Tibetan uprising? The 14th Dalai Lama had acknowledged Chinese sovereignty over Tibet, when he signed the Seventeen Point Agreement in 1951 ceding control of Tibet over to China. He accepted it for 8 years without incident, but sudden in 1959, he broke his word and led uprising (which many local Tibetans didn't join, hence the rebellion failed) and 14th DL was forced to flee to India. The 14th DL had collaborated with CIA and even criticized the CIA as shown below. CIA Tibetan program en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Criticism According to above source, the 14th Dalai Lama criticized the CIA for supporting the Tibetan independence movement "not because they (the CIA) cared about Tibetan independence, but as part of their worldwide efforts to destabilize all communist governments". -In 1999, the Dalai Lama claimed that the CIA Tibetan program had been harmful for Tibet because it was primarily aimed at serving American interests, and "once the American policy toward China changed, they stopped their help". This is supported by the fact that once President Nixon visited China in 1972, America stopped caring about Tibetan independence. Today, American recognizes Chinese sovereignty over Tibet, as do other UN countries, since nobody raises the issue of Tibet during UN meetings. India gave asylum to 14th DL, even when India forfeited all its rights in Tibet according to Panchsheel Agreement, so how can you blame China when India is not upholding its end of the bargain? If India had handled over the Dalai Lama back to China in 1959, the relations between China and India today would have been much different, and China wouldn't have grown so close to Pakistan, because India provided shelter to DL. You think every political action India takes, doesn't have its on consequences on other countries? You think Indian troops didn't kill PLA troops during military attacks in Longju and Kangla Pass? It is precisely because of those clashes, that Mao Zedong proposed 20KM demilitarized zone and ordered PLA troops to retreat to stop. But India continued to occupy those territory which PLA vacated. China wasn't even invited to sign the Treaty of San Franciso (even when it was about Chinese territory) so how could China have known about such a treaty even existing at all? You are just being biased against China that's all China has said many times that India is welcome to join Belt and Road Initiative, which will help boost India's economy and hopefully repair relations with Pakistan. Before Pakistan bought Chinese weapons, Pakistan bought Russian and US weapons, so why is India complaining here? Does India even manufacture its own weapons at all while you label Chinese weapons as "stolen" US technology? Remember, China is not forcing India to spend more on its defense budget, but Indian Army is the one entering regions like Donglong to obstruct PLA road construction and create tense situation. If you claim India doens't want to spend more on its defense, then why India taking aggressive actions in Donglong? Such actions could lead to war, and for India to spend more on its defense, so in such scenario, India has noone but itself to blame here.
    1
  24558.  @stanfrymann  Which universities are you sponsoring the 5 Khmer to? What are the 5 Khmer names and their ages?
    1
  24559.  @stanfrymann8454  So you're just sending money to unknown universities of which you don't even know the universities' names? Nor do you even know the Khmer students themselves? Sounds mighty fishy to me, why send money to universities of which you don't even know the name of?
    1
  24560. @Tenzin Tsela  Where did you hear she was the one to sponsor him? She just film this boy who spoke multiple languages, that's all, it was up to China to scout him out and enroll him.
    1
  24561. @BitterVoid "china is a horrible nation. It's communist, and arrests and harms people for no reason." Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  24562.  @stanfrymann8454  So you don't even know the names of the universities these Khmer students are being sent to? You just send money to NGO and expect them to take care of business for you?
    1
  24563.  @stanfrymann8454  So what's the names of their universities then? And I have a relative working on building infrastructure in Cambodia to help improve the lives of the people there.
    1
  24564.  @stanfrymann8454  China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Video: Road to Prosperity: Chinese infrastructure links African countries, boosts trade youtu.be/KQfh0HGzC6g
    1
  24565.  @stanfrymann8454  What's wrong with my being interested in which universities they are being sent to? You yourself don't even bother to know the names of which universities they go to, until you had to call up your advisor/translator.
    1
  24566.  @stanfrymann8454  The names of the universities tell me how little you care about the students that's all. As for your so-called debt trap allegations, President Xi Jinping has pledged to waive debts for the least developed African countries that have both high debt burdens and diplomatic ties with China. Speaking at the opening of a summit with African leaders in Beijing, Xi said his country would offer an extra $US60 billion ($83 billion) in financing to African countries. Source: China waives debt, promises 'no imposition of will' on African nations smh.com.au/world/asia/china-waives-debt-promises-no-imposition-of-will-on-african-nations-20180904-p501nr.html "In addition, for Africa's least developed countries, heavily indebted and poor countries, landlocked developing countries and small island developing countries that have diplomatic relations with China, the debt they have incurred in the form of interest-free Chinese government loans due to mature by the end of 2018 will be exempted," Xi said.
    1
  24567.  @stanfrymann8454  "神州 Shenzhou I'm wondering why you have to be nasty." Nasty? Did I ever said anything impolite or abuse vulgarities against you? All I wanted to know is the names of the universities these Khmer students are being sent to, of which you appear to have forgotten that's all, did I ever said anything impolite or rude by enquiring? About the debt, over the last 18 years, China has cancelled debt to other countries, amounting to around $9.8 billion. Source: China Has Forgiven Nearly $10 Billion In Debt. forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2019/05/29/china-has-forgiven-nearly-10-billion-in-debt-cuba-accounts-for-over-half/ In 2007, the biggest year for debt forgiveness by Chinese entities, some 25 nations saw their debt written off. But even those 25 nations were no match for the Cubans. They had a sum of just $838 million wiped out, over six times less than Havana.
    1
  24568.  @stanfrymann8454  "神州 Shenzhou You began with a comment suggesting western tourist don't care about people they meet. I said maybe you should not generalize. Then you told me repeatedly that I didn't care for the children." That is my opinion yes, but did I ever said anything impolite or abuse vulgarities against you? As for "Then you told me repeatedly that I didn't care for the children" when did I ever said such a thing repeatedly? All I did was ask "what's the names of the universities you sent them to?" that's all, when did I ever repeatedly said you didn't care for the children? And China has lifted 700 million people out of poverty by international standards in just 40 years, whereas the whole rest of the world only lifted 150 million by comparison. Video: Historical achievement: Take 700 million out of poverty youtu.be/CljWffPgmG8 "China has lifted 728 million people out of poverty by international standards. The whole rest of the world has only lifted 152 million." - John Ross, Well-known columnist in UK, Former Deputy mayor of London.
    1
  24569.  @stanfrymann8454  Yes I said "The names of the universities tell me how little you care about the students that's all." (which is my opinion) but that's only once, when did I ever said repeatedly that you didn't care for the children? I can access the whole comment thread and nowhere else did I repeatedly said that "you didn't care for the children" so why are you accusing me of saying such a thing? Why is asking "So you don't even know the names of the universities these Khmer students are being sent to? You just send the money to NGO and expect them to take care of business for you?" considered rude? I'm just asking the names of the universities that's all, I did not say anything impolite or abuse vulgarities against you. You said that "神州 Shenzhou Nothing is wrong with wanting to know information about the universities" so once again, how am I being rude by asking for the names of the universities? About what I have done to alleviate poverty in China, I was born in poor family, my parents were both engineers and still we were poor, but they managed to scrap enough money to send me to school to learn English, and I was blessed with the opportunity to travel abroad. But I was appalled at the Western anti-China media painting China in negative light and "demonising" our country. I am helping part time to teach English to poor rural families to help their children secure better job opportunities. Since you yourself have elected to badger me three times with the same question, then what point are you trying to make by asking me the same question several times?
    1
  24570.  @Esquera123  "Taiwan real name is Republic of China" I'm glad that even you acknowledged that Taiwan is part of China, since they clearly have the word China in their name. The people on Taiwan island that make those advanced chips are Chinese, Yet you've constantly look down on Chinese people when Nvidia cannot even make their own chips, instead they have to rely on Chinese workers on Taiwan island to make those advanced chips for them.
    1
  24571.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. don't know and I don't care. That is for my leader to care." You don't even know who's going to be your leader this November. You think Biden knows anything about chip making, the logistics, the materials, manpower, machinery, maintenance? Or Trump or Kamala for that matter? And America doesn't even support Taiwan independence, as mentioned by Biden, Trump or whichever POTUS.
    1
  24572.  @Esquera123  I've already quoted Wikileaks cables (from the US embassy in Beijing no less) that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square in June 1989. If you're calling it lie and misinformation, are you saying that it's the US that's spreading this about Tiananmen Square? You can go and talk to the Chilean diplomat (Carlos Gallo and his wife) who provided eyewitness accounts to the events unfolding inside Tiananmen Square.
    1
  24573.  @Esquera123  American leaders have to step down after 4-8 years so they can only make short-term plans for America's future, instead of long-term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. Because you don't know who's going to be in power next and start reversing all the reforms made by the previous president. Whereas China has made many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans to chart the course of China's path forward. By abolishing the term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term, to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050.
    1
  24574.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. stop with the history." China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt, Mesopotamia have succumbed to history. Throughout its long history, China has witness the rise and fall of many empires, the birth and death of numerous nations, and yet China has survived the passage of time to modern times relatively intact.
    1
  24575.  @Esquera123  According to Forbes, Chinese EV company BYD has actually overtaken Tesla as the world's biggest electric vehicle maker and it will soon be joined by other Chinese manufacturers as they lead the electric revolution at the expense of their Western competitors.
    1
  24576.  @Esquera123  According to Forbes, Chinese EV maker BYD has dethroned Tesla as the world's biggest electric vehicle maker and it will soon be joined by other Chinese manufacturers as they lead the electric revolution at the expense of their Western competitors.
    1
  24577.  @Esquera123  Chinese EV maker BYD has already surpassed Tesla as the world's biggest electric vehicle maker.
    1
  24578.  @Esquera123  Chinese EV maker BYD has already sold more EVs than Tesla, to become the world's largest electric vehicle maker.
    1
  24579.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. why not include "ROC is real"? Do you think they are not legitimate?" ROC lost the mainland to the PRC and fled to Taiwan, how then are they the legitimate China? And mind you, the KMT had all the wealth that USA gave it, including weapons and even outnumbered the CPC, yet they still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, outnumbered, starving CPC peasant army and had to flee to Taiwan island. How does that make ROC the legitimate China?
    1
  24580.  @Esquera123  BYD's batteries are so advanced that even Tesla has switched to BYD batteries to achieve faster charging times. Not to mention that Tesla cars are literally Made-in-China after Elon Musk opened a gigafactory in Shanghai.
    1
  24581.  @Esquera123  The Arizona chip plant has been delayed and wouldn’t be starting in 2026 as originally proposed, instead saying that the site wouldn’t be operational until 2027 or 2028.
    1
  24582.  @Esquera123  Clearly, the PRC is real. The ROC was ousted from the mainland by the PRC and fled to Taiwan. Also, the United Nations voted on 25 October 1971 to recognize the People's Republic of China as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations". The voting results were: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained Therefore, PRC is the real China as democratically voted upon by the UN nations.
    1
  24583.  @Esquera123  TMSC CEO C.C. Wei said during an earnings call Thursday it would open its Arizona fabrication plant in 2027 or 2028, at least a year later than initially announced.
    1
  24584.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. so what if Tesla use BYD battery?" It means that if you buy Tesla, you're actually buying BYD battery. And Tesla's gigafactory in Shanghai means that Tesla's cars are Made-in-China.
    1
  24585.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. Taiwan and the US are BFF forever." Most American can't even point out where Taiwan island is on the world map. Most Americans can't even distinguish which Chinese is from Taiwan island and which are from mainland China. What makes you think US will continue to support Taiwan forever?
    1
  24586.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. No ROC is real." UN countries democratically voted to recognize PRC as the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations. The vote results were 76 in favor, 35 against and 17 abstained. Since the PRC won the vote with two-thirds majority, then PRC is the real China as democratically voted upon by the UN nations.
    1
  24587.  @Esquera123  "You and I have different perspective. I stand in free world while you stand in the darkest world." The "free world" countries democratically voted to recognize PRC as China in the United Nations. It appears that you're the one living in darkness if you are so blind as to ignore this vote.
    1
  24588.  @robertroger2195  United Nations democratically voted to recognize PRC as the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations. The vote results were 76 in favor, 35 against and 17 abstained. Since the PRC won the vote with two-thirds majority, then PRC is the real China as democratically voted upon by the UN nations.
    1
  24589.  @robertroger2195  You claimed Taiwan is a de facto country, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there something that's controlling the island and preventing its entry into the UN? You said "de facto" after all, yet Taiwan is unable to achieve this?
    1
  24590.  @Esquera123  Why athletes from Taiwan can only participate in the Olympics under the name "Chinese Taipei"? The truth is that PRC is controlling Taiwan, but you just refuse to acknowledge it that's all. Even the UN vote recognized the PRC as China, but you just close your eyes to the vote that's all.
    1
  24591.  @robertroger2195  Even the United States doesn't recognize Taiwan as an independent country. President Biden has said that the US does not support Taiwan independence. Before him, the former President Trump had a phone call with Chinese President Xi and reaffirms the US commitment to the One China principle. As had all the previous US presidents been doing for the past 50 years.
    1
  24592.  @Esquera123  Why athletes from Taiwan can only participate in the Olympics under the name "Chinese Taipei"? The truth is that PRC is controlling Taiwan, but you just refuse to acknowledge it that's all.
    1
  24593.  @robertroger2195  Why athletes from Taiwan can only participate in the Olympics under the name "Chinese Taipei"? The truth is that PRC is controlling Taiwan. Taiwan can't even join the United Nations as an independent country.
    1
  24594.  @Esquera123  Why athletes from Taiwan can only participate in the Olympics under the name "Chinese Taipei"? Isn't that already a form of control in and of itself?
    1
  24595.  @robertroger2195  Even the United States doesn't recognize Taiwan as an independent country. Biden, Trump and the US presidents of the past 50 years have stated that they do not support Taiwan independence. The 1972 Shanghai Communiqué is based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position.
    1
  24596.  @robertroger2195  You said ROC is an independent country but what's the name of this country? It calls itself the Republic of China, so it's claiming to be the country of China then? But there is only One China (as agreed upon by majority of the world) and that's the PRC (as voted upon in the United Nations). The truth is that the US don't care about what happens to Taiwan, as long as they can use the island as a thorn in the mainland's side. Mainland Chinese have been taught to regard the people of Taiwan as our fellow brothers and sisters (they are Chinese after all) but in the US's eyes, they are nothing more than cannon fodder. Much like how the people of Ukraine are to NATO against Russia.
    1
  24597.  @robertroger2195  Even the United States doesn't recognize Taiwan as an independent country. President Biden has said that the US does not support Taiwan independence. Before him, the former President Trump had a phone call with Chinese President Xi and reaffirms the US commitment to the One China principle. As had all the previous US presidents been doing for the past 50 years.
    1
  24598.  @robertroger2195  Even the United States doesn't recognize Taiwan as an independent country. President Biden has said that the US does not support Taiwan independence. Before him, the former President Trump had a phone call with Chinese President Xi and reaffirms the US commitment to the One China principle. As had all the previous US presidents been doing for the past 50 years.
    1
  24599.  @Esquera123  Even the United States doesn't recognize Taiwan as an independent country. President Biden has said that the US does not support Taiwan independence. Before him, the former President Trump had a phone call with Chinese President Xi and reaffirms the US commitment to the One China principle. As had all the previous US presidents been doing for the past 50 years.
    1
  24600.  @Esquera123  Even the United States doesn't recognize Taiwan as an independent country. President Biden has said that the US does not support Taiwan independence. Before him, the former President Trump had a phone call with Chinese President Xi and reaffirms the US commitment to the One China principle. As had all the previous US presidents been doing for the past 50 years.
    1
  24601.  @funni387  Indeed. Not only did Ren Zhengfei had his company targeted by the US, but also his daughter, Meng Wanzhou was unlawfully detained in Canada by the USA for nearly 4 years, even though she did not violate any Canadian laws. Yet Huawei has survived and adapted to the circumstances.
    1
  24602.  @Esquera123  You claim Taiwan is an independent country, but clearly there is no country called Taiwan. They call themselves Republic of China, meaning that they think they represent the 5,000 year old civilization called China. But there is only One China (as agreed upon by majority of the world) and that's the PRC (as voted upon in the United Nations).
    1
  24603.  @Esquera123  "That is your idea of one China, but there is also Taiwan." One China principle is shared by the United Nations. Article 18 of the UN Charter stated that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote. The vote results were: 76 voted for, 35 voted against, 17 abstained. Since PRC won the vote with two-thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971 and recognized the People's Republic of China as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed Taiwan from the UN.
    1
  24604.  @Esquera123  "But, why TSMC doesn't have plants in prc." What are you talking about? TMSC already have chip plants in mainland China. TMSC Fab 10 is located in Songjiang, Shanghai. And TMSC's Fab 16 is located in Nanjing, Jiangsu province.
    1
  24605.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. They put Chinese Taipei, because they are Chinese Taiwanese. They are roc" I'm glad you're repeatedly acknowledged that the people of Taiwan are Chinese and that Taiwan is part of China. But you said Taiwan is an independent country and not being controlled, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations as an independent country? Is there something that's controlling the island and preventing its entry into the UN?
    1
  24606.  @Esquera123  "And Taiwan has its own president." China is unique in the sense that it allows different political systems to coexist within its borders. Under the One Country, Two System policy, Hong Kong and Macau can have their own political systems separate from the mainland as well as their own local leaders, but still be considered as part of China. The same applies with Taiwan, it may have their own separate political system with a different leader, but it's still part of China under the One China principle.
    1
  24607.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. does it produce 3 nm node there? It doesn't." Of course, not all of TMSC's chip plants make 3nm node. But you said "But, why TSMC doesn't have plants in prc." which is already proven wrong since TMSC has chip plants in Songjiang, Shanghai and in Nanjing, Jiangsu province.
    1
  24608.  @Esquera123  "And Republic of China is an de facto country." Why can't ROC join the United Nations like a independent country can? Is there something that's controlling the island and preventing its entry into the UN?
    1
  24609.  @Esquera123  "What prevented PRC from controlling Taiwan aka As roc?" I've already answered it. ROC cannot join the United Nations as an independent country, because there is something controlling it and preventing its entry into the UN.
    1
  24610.  @Esquera123  About poverty in China, according to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty; China's poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015, as measured by the percentage of people living on the equivalent of US$1.90 or less per day in 2011 purchasing price parity terms, which still stands in 2022.
    1
  24611.  @Esquera123  American sanctions do not work. For decades, they've imposed them on North Korea, and yet North Korea has survived without yielding. Same goes for Russia, yet what makes you think it works on China?
    1
  24612.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. PRC should focus on your own country especially its citizen, " America should focus on its own country, especially their borders, illegal migration, gun crime, student debt, rising cost of living, rising healthcare costs. Since you've acknowledged that Taiwan is part of China, that means the Taiwan issue is an internal affair within China. Then what business is it of the US to interfere within China's internal affairs? You've already acknowledged that Taiwan is Republic of China, meaning its up to ROC and PRC to work out the Taiwan issue, not for the US to interfer.
    1
  24613.  @RyanManioni  Did you know that according to surveys, only a minority (4%) of the people in Taiwan want independence as soon as possible. The overwhelming majority (over 80%) of the people in Taiwan prefer the status quo in which Taiwan is part of China under the One China policy. The survey also shows less identifying as ‘Taiwanese,' more as 'Chinese and Taiwanese'.
    1
  24614.  @RyanManioni  The poll was conducted in Taiwan, and it found that overwhelming majority (over 80%) of the people in Taiwan prefer the status quo. If you don't believe that poll, that means you don't believe in what the people of Taiwan prefer? Then how can you claim to be a supporter of Taiwan when you don't believe the poll?
    1
  24615.  @Esquera123  "We only care about Taiwan." If you truly care about Taiwan, then you would be against Taiwan seeking independence. Because such an act of separatism will not be tolerated by mainland China and it would lead to conflict in the Taiwan Strait, resulting in deaths as Chinese fight Chinese. The truth is that you don't care about Taiwan as long as you can use the island to contain the mainland's rise.
    1
  24616.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. you said SMIC has produced advanced chip? What controlled it and prevented it from achieving 5nm node?" Chinese company SMIC has made significant achievement in the semiconductor industry by developing a 5nm node using Deep ultraviolet (DUV) technology. This achievement comes despite US sanctions preventing access to the more advanced Extreme Ultra Violet (EUV) technology.
    1
  24617.  @Esquera123  "We only care about Taiwan." If you truly care about Taiwan, then you would be against Taiwan seeking independence. Because such an act of separatism will not be tolerated by mainland China and it would lead to conflict in the Taiwan Strait, resulting in Chinese fighting Chinese.
    1
  24618.  @Esquera123  "And American can interfere wherever they want... I already said Taiwan and the US are bestie forever." You mean like US involvement in Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, etc? USA spent nearly 20 years in Afghanistan, yet they abandoned their Afghan allies with a shambolic withdrawal from Kabul. You want the same thing to happen to Taiwan island too?
    1
  24619.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. It doesn't need to join U.N. to justify its legitimacy. Taiwan is a de facto country." Where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence then? You're encouraging Taiwan independence, when such an act of separatism will not be tolerated by mainland China and it would lead to conflict in the Taiwan Strait, resulting in Chinese fighting Chinese. The truth is that Taiwan is not an independent country because it's unable to declare independence without serious consequences.
    1
  24620.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. what happened to Huawei?" Huawei has survived the sanctions and expanded into making cars. Huawei's Luxeed S7 electric sedan is even features a self-parking function. With the push of a button on an app, the car can navigate the carpark without a driver, avoiding pedestrians and obstacles, find an empty lot and park itself. The car can even come pick up the driver to go home afterwards. You can look it up.
    1
  24621.  @Esquera123  "Not even in top 10 phone makers." According to Global Brands magazine, the top 10 mobile phone brands in 2023 are: 1. Samsung (South Korean) 2. Apple (American) 3. Huawei (Chinese) 4. Xiaomi (Chinese) 5. OPPO (Chinese) 6. Vivo (Chinese) 7. Motorola (subsidiary of the Chinese company Lenovo) 8. Lenovo (Chinese) 9. LG (South Korean) 10. Nokia (Finnish) So how is it not even in the top 10 phone makers? In fact, Chinese companies dominate the list of Top 10 mobile phone makers.
    1
  24622.  @Esquera123  "If no, go back to kindergarten." You're the one who don't even know what the world is. Even kindergarteners know what the world is, it's all the people on the Earth. That is 8 billion people, not America's population of 300 million, how does that make America the world?
    1
  24623.  @Esquera123  "Shenzhou. what is the source of your surveys? the source from your mouth? The source from trust me, bro?" The survey was conducted by National Chengchi University's Election Study Center, and it found that more than 80 percent of the people of Taiwan want to maintain the status quo with mainland China. I've been constantly citing evidence to support my arguments, whereas all you've done is dismiss my sources time and time again. Like when I showed that SMIC is now the No. 3 foundry in the world, you just dismiss it without providing any support for your argument.
    1
  24624. ​ @Esquera123  "For example, the Hong Kong protest Crackdown in 2020." The Hong Kong protests started because a Hong Kong man (named Chan) brought his pregnant girlfriend (named Poon) to Taiwan, and then proceeded to strangle her to death, before flying back to Hong Kong alone and leaving behind the body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Taiwan wanted Hong Kong to extradite this man to face justice in Taiwan's courts, but Hong Kong realized that they didn't have an extradition treaty. Furthermore, since the crime occurred overseas, Hong Kong's own courts were powerless to pursue justice for the victim's family. That's why the Hong Kong Extradition bill was proposed to rectify this legal loophole.
    1
  24625.  @Esquera123  The West's obsession with China's economic downfall has been ongoing for over 30 years. Here's a compiled list of Western journal headlines: 1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to a halt 1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning. China's Coming Financial Meltdown 2020. NYT. Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak 2021. Bloomberg. Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize 2022. Bloomberg China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n 2023. Bloomberg. No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  24626.  @otsa120  Previously, Hong Kong was under British colonial rule from 1841-1997, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before?
    1
  24627.  @otsa120  Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated those territory into Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China did a similar thing with Tibet centuries later during Qing Dynasty. Tibet broke free of China in 1913, but was reunited with the mainland by 1951.
    1
  24628.  @otsa120  Hong Kong was British colony since 1841, long before even Chinese Communist Party was formed, so why blame the CCP for Hong Kong's lack of democracy under Britain. Look, Hong Kong actually held more elections after the 1997 handover, than it ever did for 150 years as British colony. Even last Sunday, Hong Kong just held another election, but they had virtually no elections while as British colony.
    1
  24629.  @otsa120  Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, porcelain (precious china) were in great demand by the West and British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer. So Britain waged two wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. And Britain ruled Hong Kong as a colony, and did not give them the rights to vote. Only under the One Country, Two Systems Policy was Hong Kong finally allowed to vote in elections today.
    1
  24630.  @otsa120  China never invade nor colonize other countries or territories. Martin Jacques 中国从不入侵也从不殖民 Video: /watch?v=XDX8nQIEhJY
    1
  24631.  @jtbui2010  China's infrastructure construction is arguably the best in the world and we are home to many of the world's longest and highest bridges. Sources: Wikipedia: List of highest bridges Wikipedia: List of longest bridges Wikipedia: List of longest suspension bridge spans Wikipedia: List of longest masonry arch bridge spans Wikipedia: List of longest arch bridge spans Wikipedia: List of longest cable-stayed bridge spans
    1
  24632.  @PlayfulDance  About communism in South East Asia, isn't Vietnam a communist/socialist country too?
    1
  24633.  @otsa120  China had launched a punitive expedition in Vietnam, because earlier, Vietnam had invaded Cambodia/Kampuchea in 1978, had disposed of the Khmer Rouge (which was the recognised Government of Kampuchea, according to the UN) and occupied Cambodia for some time. And Cambodia is our ally, so Deng Xiaoping wanted to punish Vietnam, saying "Children who don't listen have to be spanked." Source: Wikipedia: Sino-Vietnamese War Source: Wikipedia: Punitive expedition About Tibet, in 1951 the Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet 中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议 on affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So not only does mainland China have historic claims to Tibet, but also modern claims as well. The Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (world's most spoken language by number of speakers) Chinese history and singing patriotic songs about China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth and they learn English at school, American history and sing patriotic songs about America. So what's wrong with teaching Chinese citizens Mandarin Chinese, Chinese history and developing patriotism towards their home country?
    1
  24634.  @otsa120  Look at history and human societies have traditional gravitated towards authoritarian/oligarchic forms of government. Political power was oftentimes not held by the hands of the masses, instead it was concentrated in the hands of the few elites, be it nobles (aristocracy) or priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy) or other such systems. Such authoritarian/oligarchic systems were prevalent throughout history, because they were stable and simply because they worked! The elites were oftentimes well educated and politically savvy enough to make decisions regarding the country's future, while the ignorant masses were kept far from politics. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court and we were prosperous throughout much of history. Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by the rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, flowed Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china) which were in great demand throughout the ancient world. So doesn't history show that authoritarian/oligarchic rule was the norm throughout history?
    1
  24635.  @otsa120  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CCP, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: Wikipedia: List of universities and colleges in Tibet Source: Wikipedia: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    1
  24636.  @otsa120  "神州 Shenzhou history shows precisely the opposite" Look at history and human societies have been overwhelmingly authoritarian/oligarchic in nature. Democracy has actually has a long history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, even Republic of Rome eventually failed. These proto-democracies weren't successful and the concept of democracy wasn't even popular outside of Greece. Most ancient civilizations adopted authoritarian/oligarchic rule, so why assume that democracy is the best form of government then? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  24637.  @otsa120  Throughout history, human societies have been overwhelmingly authoritarian/oligarchic in nature. For example, Achaemenid Empire, Akkadian empire, Armenian empire, Aksumite empire, Angevin empire, Armenian empire, Ashanti Empire, Austrian empire, Aztec empire, Babylonian empire, Bamana empire, Belgium empire, Benin empire, Bornu empire, Brazil empire, Bruneian empire, Bulgarian empire, Danish empire, Egyptian empire, Ethiopian empire, Inca empire, Indian empire Japanese empire, Korean empire, and so many more! Look, democracy wasn't even popular in the rest of the ancient world outside of Greece. Modern Western democracy only has a history of 100-200 years, so that's not guaranteed to be successful in the future. But China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  24638.  @otsa120  You said "I am not interested in such a discussion in the first place, I would refrain from commenting on how form of government should be weighted." Then why are you even commenting on China's political system in the first place you tell me? I have shown that China's current political system is viable for our country, what's your problem then? I have shown China has always been under authoritarian rule of emperors and the imperial court (and we still are today) so what's your problem? I've even shown that historically, an overwhelming majority of political systems adopted authoritarian/oligarchic rule as opposed to democratic systems. You're the one who has a problem with China's political system here, not me. It's like you simply refuse to accept the truth that China is flourishing under authoritarian rule (as we've been throughout history)
    1
  24639.  @otsa120  Then what makes you think democratic systems are better than authoritarian systems? History has shown that authoritarian/oligarchic rule is prevalent as compared to democratic rule. History is the best teacher is it not? And history is telling you that authoritarian systems worked.
    1
  24640.  @otsa120  Modern China is clearly defensive, since I brought up previously that the People's Liberation Army hasn't had any actual combat experience since 1979 isn't it? I've already argued my stance long ago, yet you're accusing me of changing the topic?
    1
  24641.  @otsa120  Hey I thought you wanted to talk about "Modern China" yet you want to go back beyond 1979? What biased double standards is this? I've talked plenty of words about how China has always been under authoritarian rule, how virtually every other ancient civilization was authoritarian/oligarchic and democracy was never popular outside of Greece in the ancient world. My stance is rock solid and backed by thousands of years of historical analysis, but what exactly have you even contributed to support your stance? You're just behaving similarly to those anti-China haters that's all, who care nothing for China's interests nor do they wish to see China succeed.
    1
  24642.  @otsa120  You brought up Vietnam, but Vietnam has been free of Chinese rule since Ming Dynasty. The Ming dynasty invaded Vietnam and occupied Vietnam in what would be the Fourth Millennium, only be defeated by the army of rebel leader Lê Lợi, who later founded the Later Lê Dynasty in Vietnam. The Qing dynasty had also attempted to conquer Vietnam but was defeated by Emperor Quang Trung at 1789. Thats about 200-300 years ago. Vietnam became a French colony, but Communist China actually helped Vietnam gain independence from the French. During the 1st Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons (ranging from artillery guns (24 of such were used at the Battle of Dien Bien Phu) to rifles and machine-guns), ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. On top of this, the PRC sent two People's Liberation Army (PLA) artillery battalions to help Vietnamese fight the French for independence. Source: Wikipedia: First Indochina War From 1950 to 1954, the Chinese government shipped goods, materials, and medicine worth $43 billion (in 2019 dollars) to Vietnam. From 1950 to 1956, the Chinese government had also shipped 155,000 small arms, 58 million rounds of ammunition, 4,630 artillery pieces, 1,080,000 artillery shells, 840,000 hand grenades, 1,400,000 uniforms, 1,200 vehicles, 14,000 tons of food, and 26,000 tons of fuel to Vietnam. Yet some Vietnamese nationalist conveniently forgot China's contribution to the Vietnamese independence, some even insisted that they defeated the French all by themselves.
    1
  24643.  @otsa120  Then what do you consider "Modern" China? I gave you my cutoff point at 1979, but all you done is dismiss my points without ever offering anything in return. And China is actually the first country to use multiple political systems within our borders, in the form of the One Country, Two Systems Policy. No other countries in the world is willing to tolerate multiple political system existing within its borders, except for China. Japan today is currently not at war (since the Japanese surrender in 1945) with any country, so likewise, China today is currently not at war too, (since 1979) so why did you even bring up Japan in the first place?
    1
  24644.  @otsa120  During the Vietnam War, the Americans dropped napalm bombs on Vietnamese villages (remember the 'Napalm Girl' photo?) and torched their villages to the ground. The Americans sprayed chemical defoliants like Agent Orange (which cause deformities in Vietnamese even till today) and the US soldiers slept with Vietnamese women and impregnated them, and then they abandoned the South Vietnamese to the communists and refuse to grant many of their children born rightful US citizenship. Yet the Vietnamese conveniently forget US atrocities? China also aided the Vietnamese during Vietnam War. People’s Liberation Army (PLA) forces began flowing into North Vietnam in July 1965 to help defend Hanoi and its major transportation systems. The total number of Chinese troops in North Vietnam between June 1965 and March 1968 amounted to over 320,000. China also provided Vietnam with with 5,670 sets of uniforms, 5,670 pairs of shoes, 567 tons of rice, 20.7 tons of salt, 55.2 tons of meat, 20.7 tons of fish, 20.7 tons of sesame and peanuts, 20.7 tons of beans, 20.7 tons of lard, 6.9 tons of soy sauce, 20,7 tons of white sugar, 8,000 toothbrushes, 11,100 tubes of toothpaste, 35,300 bars of soap, and 109,000 cases of cigarettes. In total, the agreement included 687 different items, covering such goods as table tennis balls, volleyballs, harmonicas, playing cards, pins, fountain pen ink, sewing needle, and vegetable seeds. Source: Wikipedia: China in the Vietnam War According to the table, China supplied Vietnam with: 1,922,897 Guns 64,529 Artillery pieces 1,048,207,000 Bullets 17,074,000 Artillery Shells 30,808 Radio Transmitters 48,922 Telephones 560 Tanks 164 Planes 15,771 Automobiles Yet the Vietnamese seem to have forgotten Chinese aid to Vietnam during the Vietnam War and they forgotten US atrocities in Vietnam?
    1
  24645.  @otsa120  And like I said, China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Which country is China currently at war with you tell me? Our People's Liberation Army soldiers haven't had any actual combat experience since 1979 isn't it? And did I ever said someone claim Japan is still currently at war? Imperial Japan committed numerous wartime atrocities like Nanjing Massacre, Unit 731, and comfort women issue
    1
  24646.  @otsa120  Can you explain why you think that the Vietnamese would prefer US influence? The American soldiers dropped napalm bombs on Vietnamese villages and torched them to the ground, and they sprayed chemical defoliants like Agent Orange (which cause birth deformities in Vietnamese children even till today) and US soldiers impregnated Vietnamese women, but refused to grant US citizenship to their offspring.
    1
  24647.  @otsa120  Which part of Hong Kong Basic Law was universal suffrage ever promised to Hong Kong? Previously, Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule from 1841-1997, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as British colony?
    1
  24648. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiment in the West today against Russia and China. And it's having the effect of pushing both countries closer together than we've ever been.
    1
  24649. Russophobia and Sinophobia in the West is literally pushing both Russia and China closer together than we've ever been.
    1
  24650. The Red Scare and Yellow Peril mindset in the West is literally pushing both Russia and China closer together than we've ever been.
    1
  24651. 应该换名叫 傻逼逼吸
    1
  24652. If President Xi Jinping has shown to be competent in his leadership and is willing to tackle the mountain of corruption within the communist party, then most Chinese people see nothing wrong with leaving him in power to maximise the benefits to China. Not often you get a leader willing to deal with corruption, so why not leave him in power so he can do his job?
    1
  24653. Actually, Chinese government agree to UN sanctions on North Korea, primarily because we want to punish N. Korean most recent missile test which was launched presumably in response to coincide during BRICS summit held in China. So this latest UN sanctions is magnificent opportunity for the government to punish N. Korea.
    1
  24654. In China, the media is regulated by the government to control the spread of fake news. In the West, literally anyone can put on a journalist cap and start producing fake news.
    1
  24655.  @gulamog5041  "神州 Shenzhou there are officially Two Chinas," Wrong, there is officially One China, even both the ROC and PRC agree that there is One China, what Two Chinas are you talking about?
    1
  24656.  @gulamog5041  You said: "ROC is the real China. CCP is fake China." If ROC was the real China, then why did ROC lose the mainland to CPC and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the ROC had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, heavily outnumbered, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while at the same time, it cements the CPC's right to rule China. Then how is ROC the real China while the CPC isn't?
    1
  24657.  @gulamog5041  You said: "Taiwan never was controlled by the Evil Commies. Therefore Taiwan ROC is independent country from CCP China." Then why Taiwan cannot join UN and WHO? You claim Taiwan is independent country and nobody is controlling it, then it should be able to join UN and WHO, isn't it? Or is there "something controlling Taiwan" and preventing Taiwan from joining UN and WHO, that you're afraid to admit?
    1
  24658.  @gulamog5041  The People's Liberation Army Navy is the largest navy in Asia and consists of: -2 aircraft carriers -1 landing helicopter dock -8 amphibious transport docks -32 landing ship tanks -33 landing ship mediums -39 destroyers -49 frigates -72 corvettes -109 missile boats -94 submarine chasers ->17 gunboats 36 mine countermeasure vessels -79 submarines -19 replenishment ships (232 auxiliaries) How does Taiwan Navy or Japanese Self-Defense Forces stand a chance against the PLAN?
    1
  24659.  @gulamog5041  "神州 Shenzhou ROC is the Real China because CCP is Communist Totalitarian Dictatorship and have no Human Rights, Freedoms, and Democracy." Then why did superior ROC army lose the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, heavily outnumbered, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, nobody thought the Communists would succeed yet fast forward till today and look at how far China has come under the leadership of the Communists?
    1
  24660.  @gulamog5041  "神州 Shenzhou There are Two Chinas today," Wrong, both ROC and PROC agree that there is only One China. Even the United States agreed under the Shanghai Communiqué (1972), that Taiwan is part of China.
    1
  24661.  @gulamog5041  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwan cannot join UN and WHO because CCP is bribing UN and WHO with Communist Money" So you're admitting that Taiwan is being controlled by CPC and unable to join the UN and WHO? Then means you agree that Taiwan is being controlled by CPC, otherwise, they can join the UN and WHO if they were an independent country.
    1
  24662.  @gulamog5041  "神州 Shenzhou that CCP Navy is super weak compared to USA Navy" The mighty United States Army just lost a 20 year war in Afghanistan to a bunch of insurgents lacking any airforce or navy of their own, what makes you think the the USA can takeover CCP China anytime?
    1
  24663.  @gulamog5041  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  24664.  @gulamog5041  The United States can't even win a war against a bunch of insurgents in Afghanistan, after spending 20 years and pouring trillions of dollars into Afghanistan. The U.S's democratic experiment in Afghanistan has failed, their democratically elected Afghan government collapsed like a house of cards after the U.S withdrawal, the elected Afghan President Ghani fled the country with truckloads of cash, and the 300,000 strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban without putting up a fight. This shows that you can't just impose democracy onto other countries and expect the country to succeed.
    1
  24665.  @gulamog5041  Why are you defending the evil warmongering USA so much? Look at how many wars the United States caused "in the name of freedom and democracy", and you still want to defend the USA? China spend money building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels in other countries that will benefit the people, but the United States spend money fighting wars and killing people.
    1
  24666.  @gulamog5041  About the "real China", the United Nation countries democratically voted to recognize People's Republic of China (PRC) as "China" and to kick Taiwan out of the UN in 1971. The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was passed in response to the UN General Assembly Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The poll results were as follows: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting ... Source: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_2758 Since PRC won the vote with two thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971 and recognized the PRC as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" from the UN. So the UN countries democratically voted to recognise PRC as the real China in the UN, this was your countries doing.
    1
  24667. Some Chinese businessmen (not all) acquired their wealth through illegal means, and China's anti-corruption crackdown has resulted in some of them leaving China and bringing their ill-gotten gains with them.
    1
  24668. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  24669.  @almondcaeser9587  During the Vietnam War, the PLA provided the PAVN/VC with 5,670 sets of uniforms, 5,670 pairs of shoes, 567 tons of rice, 20.7 tons of salt, 55.2 tons of meat, 20.7 tons of fish, 20.7 tons of sesame and peanuts, 20.7 tons of beans, 20.7 tons of lard, 6.9 tons of soy sauce, 20,7 tons of white sugar, 8,000 toothbrushes, 11,100 tubes of toothpaste, 35,300 bars of soap, and 109,000 cases of cigarettes. From 1964 to 1975, China sent Vietnam: -1,922,897 Guns -64,529 Artillery pieces -1,048,207,000 Bullets -17,074,000 Artillery shells -30,808 Radio transmitters -48,922 Telephones -560 Tanks -164 Planes -15,771 Automobiles .... Source: Wikipedia: China in the Vietnam War Yet many Vietnamese nationalists conveniently forgotten Chinese aid given to Vietnam during the War, and you just blindly say Vietnam should side with the USA? Even after the U.S pulled out of Saigon?
    1
  24670.  @almondcaeser9587  During the Vietnam War, the PLA provided the PAVN/VC with 5,670 sets of uniforms, 5,670 pairs of shoes, 567 tons of rice, 20.7 tons of salt, 55.2 tons of meat, 20.7 tons of fish, 20.7 tons of sesame and peanuts, 20.7 tons of beans, 20.7 tons of lard, 6.9 tons of soy sauce, 20,7 tons of white sugar, 8,000 toothbrushes, 11,100 tubes of toothpaste, 35,300 bars of soap, and 109,000 cases of cigarettes. From 1964 to 1975, China sent Vietnam: -1,922,897 Guns -64,529 Artillery pieces -1,048,207,000 Bullets -17,074,000 Artillery shells -30,808 Radio transmitters -48,922 Telephones -560 Tanks -164 Planes -15,771 Automobiles ... Source: Wikipedia: China in the Vietnam War Yet many Vietnamese nationalists conveniently forgotten Chinese aid given to Vietnam against the Americans
    1
  24671.  @almondcaeser9587  During the Vietnam War, the PLA provided the PAVN/VC with 5,670 sets of uniforms, 5,670 pairs of shoes, 567 tons of rice, 20.7 tons of salt, 55.2 tons of meat, 20.7 tons of fish, 20.7 tons of sesame and peanuts, 20.7 tons of beans, 20.7 tons of lard, 6.9 tons of soy sauce, 20,7 tons of white sugar, 8,000 toothbrushes, 11,100 tubes of toothpaste, 35,300 bars of soap, and 109,000 cases of cigarettes. From 1964 to 1975, China sent Vietnam 922,897 Guns, 64,529 Artillery pieces, 1,048,207,000 Bullets, 17,074,000 Artillery shells, 30,808 Radio transmitters, 48,922 Telephones, 560 Tanks, 164 Planes and 15,771 Automobiles. Source: Wikipedia: China in Vietnam War Yet many Vietnamese nationalist conveniently forgotten the aid China gave to them against the Americans?
    1
  24672.  @almondcaeser9587  The U.S has a habit of abandoning their allies, like when USA withdrew from Kabul, then what makes you think Vietnam and the Philippines should side with USA? Did you forget the U.S withdrawal of Saigon?
    1
  24673.  @Ayeen1986  Agreed. That guy doesn't actually give any concrete reason why Vietnam or Philippines are better off with the USA. The Americans (in)famously abandoned Vietnam in the Fall of Saigon, yet he thinks Vietnam should side with USA?
    1
  24674.  @geoff9858  Agreed. Sri Lanka's debt woes are caused by many factors and other countries like Japan also hold a significant amount of Sri Lanka's debt. But some commentators on this thread seem interested in assigning blame to China only, for Sri Lanka's economic woes.
    1
  24675.  @almondcaeser9587  You said: "Take Hambantota in Sri Lanka as an example." But we've already gone over this, that Sri Lanka accepting the deal to lease Hambantota port for 99-years actually frees up government revenue to spend elsewhere, that would have otherwise been used to repay debts. Furthermore, the fact that you claim Sri Lankan government can pay off that amount of money in 1 year, then if your claims were true, you've just proven Sri Lanka isn't in a debt trap after all. Thus far, you're unable to explain how exactly is the Hambantota deal is a debt trap at all.
    1
  24676.  @almondcaeser9587  Nowhere in your wall of text did you even mention how Hambantota Port is related to the issue. If you look up Hambantota International Port page on Wikipedia it says that Chinese company China Merchants Port paid US$1.12 billion to Sri Lanka and spend additional amounts to develop the port into full operation, then what debt trap are you talking about when Sri Lankan government literally received $1.12 billion from Chinese company?
    1
  24677.  @almondcaeser9587  China Merchant Port literally paid US$1.12 billion to Sri Lanka, so how is it a debt trap, when Sri Lankan government literally received the money from the Chinese company? And mind you, this $1,12 billion is a payment, not a loan, so what debt trap are you talking about? You said: "but as a neutral man i have neutral perspective." What neutral perspective? From the beginning of this thread, you've been painting everything China does in a negative light, and constantly dismiss anything positive China does, then you are clearly anti-China in you comments, so why pretend to be neutral?
    1
  24678.  @almondcaeser9587  But earlier you said that China will generate hundreds of billions and maybe many trillions over the course of 99 years business through Hambantota Port, then how is it an unnecessary project that can't generate any income? It's the contradiction in your words that you refuse to address, you just ignore it and pretend that there's no contradiction. "Though Sri Lanka and China didn't directly cancel off the chinese loans but instead paid the other loans." So those loans have been paid? Then how is Sri Lanka in a debt trap by China? The 99-year lease will expire in 99 years time, and the port will be returned to Sri Lanka and the debt considered fully repaid by then, so how is this a debt trap?
    1
  24679.  @almondcaeser9587  Are you from Sri Lanka yourself? You claim to be a "neutral man" but just looking at all your posts, it's full of negative portrayal of China and constantly dismissing anything positive that China does, so why pretend to be "neutral" when you're clearly anti-China in your stance?
    1
  24680.  @almondcaeser9587  As a Chinese person myself, can't I defend China? You claim to be a "neutral man with neutral perspective" but thus far, all your comments are virtually anti-China in nature, having a negative portrayal of China while dismissing anything positive by China, so how can you continue to claim neutrality? As for the South China Sea, the majority of the Paracel islands lie within 200 nautical miles of China's geographic baseline, so can't China claim the Paracel Islands as part of our exclusive economic zone?
    1
  24681.  @almondcaeser9587  There's article published by The Atlantic entitled: The Chinese ‘Debt Trap’ Is a Myth (By authors Deborah Brautigam and Meg Rithmire) and they debunked the whole debt trap myth. Our research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country, much less the port of Hambantota. A Chinese company’s acquisition of a majority stake in the port was a cautionary tale, but it’s not the one we’ve often heard
    1
  24682.  @almondcaeser9587  So how is Hambantota an "unnecessary project that cannot generate income" when you're literally saying that Hambantota can "generate billions of dollars over the course of 99 years?" Therein lies your contradiction, and it appears that you just can't wrap your head around your own contradiction, you're either ignoring it or pretending that it doesn't exist, because all you want to do is portray China in a negative light that's all. After 99 years, the lease would have expired, the port returned to Sri Lanka and the debt considered repaid, so how is this a bad deal, when Sri Lanka will be inheriting a port that generates billions in income (according to you) after 99 years? Clearly this deal is to the benefit of Sri Lanka, and not a debt trap like you claimed. Many articles have debunked this whole China debt trap myth, which you are trying to keep alive for some reason.
    1
  24683.  @almondcaeser9587  But the whole China debt trap myth has been debunked. Take the Lowy Institute for example, they published an article entitled: _"Debunking the myth of China’s “debt-trap diplomacy”"_ (By Sharhar Hameiri). In our report, recently published by Chatham House, Lee Jones and I argue, however, that the assumptions underlying Australia’s response to the BRI are mistaken. China’s “debt-trap diplomacy” is a myth. Take Sri Lanka’s Hambantota Port. It is portrayed as the case par excellence for China’s debt-trap diplomacy. The conventional account is that China lent money to Sri Lanka to build the port, knowing that Colombo would experience debt distress and Beijing could then seize it in exchange for debt relief, permitting its use by China’s navy. ... This narrative is simply incorrect. The project was proposed by former Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa, not Beijing, as part of his government’s corrupt and unsustainable development program. It quickly became a “white elephant”, however, creating vast surplus capacity and adding to Sri Lanka’s financial woes. Sri Lanka’s debt distress arose not from Chinese lending, but from excessive borrowing on Western-dominated capital markets._ ... So here we have actual published articles debunking the China debt trap myth (and in fact, seemingly pinning the blame on Western-dominated capital markets) so why do you persist in keeping this debt trap myth alive? You can't even refute the point, you resort to Person A, Person B examples that aren't based in reality.
    1
  24684.  @almondcaeser9587  There's another article published by Lowy Institute entitled: "Debunking the myth of China’s “debt-trap diplomacy”" (By Sharhar Hameiri): In our report, recently published by Chatham House, Lee Jones and I argue, however, that the assumptions underlying Australia’s response to the BRI are mistaken. China’s “debt-trap diplomacy” is a myth. Take Sri Lanka’s Hambantota Port. It is portrayed as the case par excellence for China’s debt-trap diplomacy. The conventional account is that China lent money to Sri Lanka to build the port, knowing that Colombo would experience debt distress and Beijing could then seize it in exchange for debt relief, permitting its use by China’s navy. ... This narrative is simply incorrect. The project was proposed by former Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa, not Beijing, as part of his government’s corrupt and unsustainable development program. It quickly became a “white elephant”, however, creating vast surplus capacity and adding to Sri Lanka’s financial woes. Sri Lanka’s debt distress arose not from Chinese lending, but from excessive borrowing on Western-dominated capital markets._ ... So how does your claim of China's debt trap still stand?
    1
  24685.  @adamndirtyape  "神州 Shenzhou Sri Lanka effectively lost sovereignty over that port for 99 years and will get almost nothing of benefit from its operation in all that time." Was Sri Lanka's Hambantota Port even generating income before the leasing? Then what loss is it to Sri Lanka that they lease the port to Chinese companies to develop for 99 years? After 99-years, the lease would have expired, and the port returned back to Sri Lanka, and if the port is thriving in 99 years time, then Sri Lanka stands to benefit in the long-term. So how is it a sucker's deal? You said: "And $1.2 billion for letting China have control over the port for 99 years means Sri Lanka gets the equivalent of a mere $12 million in revenue per year for the lease, all upfront." Again we come back to my earlier question. Was Sri Lanka's Hambantota Port even generating income before the leasing? If not, then (in your words) "a mere $12 million in revenue" per year is a windfall for crying out loud. We're talking $12,000,000 per year according to you. You said: "In the long run, they lose much more than they gain." Could you explain how? I've already explained that after 99-years, the lease would expire and the port returned to Sri Lanka. If the port is thriving in 99 years time, then Sri Lanka stands to gain a well-developed, thriving port in the future.
    1
  24686.  @adamndirtyape  "神州 Shenzhou Then in 1979 China invaded Vietnam in a war.." The Sino-Vietnam War was a punitive war undertaken by China to punish Vietnam for their invasion of Kampuchea (Cambodia) and their overthrow of the Government of Kampuchea. Vietnam had invaded Cambodia and overthrown its government, and just sat there without installing a new government or doing anything. Additionally, the Sino-Soviet split meant that USA was wooing China to go against Vietnam (Soviet's ally) and most likely a deal was made between U.S President Carter and Chinese Vice Premier Deng, that China would punish Vietnam in a short, controlled conflict, in exchange for greater U.S-China cooperation.
    1
  24687.  @adamndirtyape  So Vietnam is supposed to ignore the U.S dropping napalm bombs and torching their villages? Or the U.S spraying chemical defoliants causing birth defects in Vietnamese children even till today? Also, could you answer my question of how much income was Hambantota Port even generating before it was leased to Chinese companies?
    1
  24688.  @MarkYeung1  Even Americans like Henry Kissinger and U.S General Mark Milley are basically calling for Zelenskyy to sue for peace. Many captured Ukrainian cities are hoisting the Soviet Union flag, and openly trading in Russian ruble. And again, what has the Japanese invasion and atrocities even got to do with this? You can't just superimpose one conflict onto another and pretend they are the same.
    1
  24689.  @MarkYeung1  What has Japanese invasion and atrocities even have to do with this? Even Americans like Kissinger and U.S General Mark Milley are basically calling for Zelenskyy to sue for peace.
    1
  24690. Ukraine lose the war long ago, at this stage Ukraine is merely on life support provided by the US.
    1
  24691.  @Camcolito  That guy was complaining about Walmart, yet look at how many Americans flock to Walmart because of their everyday low prices, because it saves them money on living expenses to spend elsewhere. In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, whereas in USA, the U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit, waging wars in the Middle East to control the oil prices, for example.
    1
  24692.  @Camcolito  Sure, American worker's purchasing power did not increase for decades, but thanks to cheap Chinese goods entering the US markets, Americans can still purchase more cheaper goods today than they could decades ago, even with the same unchanged level of income! Can't you see this logic? American worker's wages have not increased, but the cost of goods has reduced, thanks to China. So just because American workers wages have not increased, doesn’t affect the fact that Americans can still purchase more goods today than they could decades ago. Yet you still claim that "the fact that the goods are cheap is of no benefit"? How? I literally proven my point several times, you failed to address it and just at claim I'm reducing it to Chinese benevolence? And frankly speaking, what's wrong with "Chinese benevolence" and why are you so reluctant to admit that China actually benefited America? China helped America (I shown it) but you refused to give China credit where credit is due? And Chinese workers are producing goods in order to meet the huge demands by Americans, yet you want to blame China for destroying the planet? What biased double standards is this?
    1
  24693.  @Camcolito  Who else is going to produce the goods to meet the demands of Americans, if not the factory of the world, China? China has air pollution problems yes, because of our over-reliance on coal power, which burns dirtily and produce smog, so the government built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/b8cCsUBYSkw And you yourself said American workers income levels hasn't changed for decades, but it doesn't affect the fact that goods in America are now cheaper thanks to Chinese goods entering the US markets, so can't you see the logic? Americans can afford more goods today despite having the same unchanged income levels, thanks to Chinese workers. You can't even refute this point, that Americans have profited off Chinese goods and saved money on living expenses to spend elsewhere, at the expense of Chinese workers working lower salaries than American workers. And you clearly have biased double standards, you constantly reduce my points to "Chinese benevolence", when you're just unwilling to admit the fact that China benefited America, because you refuse to give credit to China, where credit is due. What's wrong with my characterisation? You're the one clearly reluctant to admit to the fact that China benefited America, yet you claim to not have double standards? When you've been biasedly victimising the Americans all this while?
    1
  24694.  @Camcolito  All you brought up was American worker's purchasing power remained unchanged for decades, and I refuted it through cheaper Chinese goods entering the US markets, helping Americans save money on living expenses even if their incomes remained unchanged! You can't refute my point that Americans profit off cheaper Chinese goods, both the wealthy and the poor, saving money on living expenses to spend elsewhere. I repeat it, because you haven't refuted it, you just simply refuse to acknowledge the fact that China benefited America, because you're reluctant to admit anything good about China. Even the destruction of the Earth is fueled by American consumerism for Chinese goods, but you rather blame China than America. Yet you claim you don't hold biased double standards? The Three Gorges Dam makes China the world's largest producer of hydroelectricity, some 856.4 billion kilowatt hours a year – more than double the amount produced by Brazil, in second place. The top three is completed by Canada, which produces 376.7 billion kilowatt hours a year. Source: China produces the most electricity from hydroelectric power weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/which-countries-produce-the-most-hydroelectric-power/ You claim you're not an apologist for the USA, but thus far, all you done is paint Americans as the victims (victimisation) that's all, how are you not holding biased double standards?
    1
  24695.  @MarkYeung1  North Korea's government is mobilizing all available resources to handle the outbreak.
    1
  24696.  @firmaith  A survey by Harvard University and Ash Center has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Communist Party of China. If anything, this shows that the Chinese government is able to deliver to the people. Whereas the U.S government is not of the people, by the people, for the people, it's a government of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%. The U.S is more a plutocracy rather than a democracy, and the U.S government isn't able to deliver what the Americans want.
    1
  24697.  @MarkYeung1  Sanctions clearly don't work on North Korea. How long have the U.S been sanctioning the DPRK and has it resulted in regime change? This just goes to show the futility of U.S sanctions in enacting regime change. In fact, China is arguing for the easing of sanctions on North Korea on humanitarian grounds. Dialogue is the key to diffusing tensions on the Korean peninsula. (I also found it ironic that the U.S tested a missile in mid-March, yet nobody wants to sanction the U.S for its missile tests).
    1
  24698.  @Logos-Nomos  If they are the legit government, then why'd the Nationalist KMT lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taipei? Shouldn't the support of the mainland people be behind the KMT? Yet in the end the KMT had to flee to Taiwan? How does that make Taipei the legit government of China? Even the UN countries voted to recognize the PRC 🇨🇳 as China in the UN security council and to kick the ROC 🇹🇼 out of the UN. The Resolution 2758 was passed in response to Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The poll results were as follows: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting ... Source: Wikipedia: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 Since the PRC won the vote with two-thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, and recognized the People's Republic of China as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" from the UN. In short, your countries voted democratically in the UN to recognize the PRC and to kick Taiwan out of the UN. So how is Taipei the legit government of China?
    1
  24699.  @Logos-Nomos  Even the UN countries voted to recognize the PRC 🇨🇳 as China in the UN security council and to kick the ROC 🇹🇼 out of the UN. The Resolution 2758 was passed in response to Resolution 1668 that required any change in China's representation in the UN be determined by a two-thirds vote referring to Article 18 of the UN Charter. The poll results were as follows: -76 voted for -35 voted against -17 abstained -3 non-voting ... Source: Wikipedia: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 Since the PRC won the vote with two-thirds majority, the resolution was passed on 25 October 1971, and recognized the People's Republic of China as "the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations" and removed "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek" from the UN. In short, your countries voted democratically in the UN to recognize the PRC and to kick Taiwan out of the UN. So how is Taipei the legit government of China?
    1
  24700.  @Logos-Nomos  If they are the legit government, then why'd the Nationalist KMT lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taipei? Shouldn't the support of the mainland people be behind the KMT? Yet in the end the KMT had to flee to Taiwan? How does that make Taipei the legit government of China?
    1
  24701.  @Logos-Nomos  How are they the legit government of China? ROC literally lost the mainland to PRC and had to flee to Taiwan, how does that make them the rightful ruler of China?
    1
  24702. Like Russia, China has hypersonic missiles of our own such as the DF-21D that launches from from a mobile land launcher and is equipped with anti-missile evasion systems and is even capable of terminal guidance, making minute adjustments just seconds before impact. Video: China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile 1080pHD youtu.be/p-cEunmqXM8
    1
  24703.  @repealsection230forbigtech4  That's because thus far, China has had no real opportunity to test our hypersonic DF-21D anti-ship ballistic missile out in actual combat. Russia's hypersonic Kinzal (Dagger) missile has proven itself in combat, travelling at speeds up to Mach 10 (or 10x the speed of sound). So fast that the missile forms a plasma-bubble that absorbs radar, masking its approach to strike Ukrainian ammo and fuel depots with precision. Even the United States has stated that they do not have any hypersonic weapons of their own, nor can they counter such weapons from Russia and China.
    1
  24704.  @repealsection230forbigtech4  In real combat, the PLA Rocket Force won't launch a single missile alone, they'll launch a barrage of DF missiles to saturate the target region. China has revealed footage of its next-generation Dongfeng-26 ballistic missile. The mid-range ballistic missile is described as having improved stability and accuracy and can fly 3,000km to 5,741km (1,864 to 3,567 miles), putting the U.S territory Guam within striking distance. Video: China’s DF-26 ballistic missile drill sends ‘clear message’ to the U.S. youtu.be/Y5f-qvnabHY
    1
  24705. China had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. The China Initiative program that was aimed at cracking down on economic espionage by Beijing has been criticized as unfairly targeting Chinese professors at American colleges because of their ethnicity and has contributed to anti-Chinese bias among Americans.
    1
  24706.  @yuanfangli9272  Why do you want Chinese people to get rid of the Communist Party of China? The collapse of the CPC would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you want such a catastrophic event to happen to China?
    1
  24707.  @MarkYeung1  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. In fact, the current system of governance of China under the leadership of President Xi Jinping and the Communist Party closely resembles the Imperial system under the authoritarian rule of the Emperor and the Imperial Court. This shows that not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  24708.  @yuanfangli9272  You claimed China has 5,000 years of history and that the Communist Party does not represent Chinese culture. But for 5,000 years of history, China had been under the authoritarian rule of the Emperor and the Imperial Court, and the Imperial Army of China belonged to whichever dynasty was in charge of China at that time. The current political system under the Chairman and the Communist Party closely emulates ancient Chinese political system of the Emperor and the Imperial Court. Because this is Chinese culture, to be under a strong central government (as proven in 5,000 years of Chinese history).
    1
  24709.  @MarkYeung1  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time.
    1
  24710.  @MarkYeung1  But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952-1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983-1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965-1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965-1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership.
    1
  24711.  @yuanfangli9272  中国五千年的历史一直是在专制领导下，那么换成西方民主的原因有什么意思？如果在共产党下死亡人数最多，那么为什么中国是当今世界上人口最多的国家呢？China has estimated 1.4 billion people today, so how is the death toll under the Communist Party the highest during peacetime? And throughout China's 5,000 years of history, it has been under an authoritarian central government by Emperors and the Imperial Court, with the Imperial Army being loyal to whichever dynasty is in power, so the current political system under the Chairman and the Communist Party closely emulates the governing systems of the past. China is living proof that not all countries have to adopt Western brand of democracy to be successful. Why then should Chinese people do as you say and overthrow our government? The CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country.
    1
  24712.  @MarkYeung1  Democracy exists in many different forms. President Xi emphasized that Chinese democracy is a core issue of China. But the democracy in Hong Kong and Taiwan are Western style democracy, which are a different form of democracy that have been artificially introduced into their systems. Previously Hong Kong had been under authoritarian British colonial rule, during which the people of Hong Kong never got to vote for their governors. Hong Kong had been a British colony for over 150 years, yet Britain never granted democracy to them all this time, so why is your mind set on Western-style democracy being the "correct course" of action? History has shown Hong Kong was prosperous even without Western-style democracy. In fact, democracy was introduced to Hong Kong in the form of the One Country, Two System by Deng Xiaoping (i.e by China, not Britain) You yourself admitted that Hong Kong is part of China, so by right, Hong Kong should have followed mainland's form of governance. Yet China made an exception for Hong Kong, and allowed them elections where there had been none prior in its history. But what exactly has Western style democracy brought Hong Kong? In 1997, Hong Kong made up 25% of China's GDP, now it's down to 4%. What good is such a system to Hong Kong when it had never existed previously?
    1
  24713.  @DucaTech  "Chinese were always second class citizens under British Rule. Stockholm Syndrome much?" Precisely. Some Hongkongers (not all) have "colonial mentality," having an ingrained perception that western virtues and cultures are inherently superior to those of non-white cultures, including their own. The colonizer not only colonized lands, but they also colonized the minds of the local people, through the education system promoting their culture over that of the local inhabitants. Even after the colonizer left, the minds of many local people remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. It's really like Stockholm Syndrome, or sometimes called Pinkerton Syndrome.
    1
  24714. While its true that solar panels can't generate power at night, the solar farm Cyrus mentioned at the beginning makes use of molten salt technology to store excess heat accumulated during the day to allow for the production of electricity even at night. Instead of employing solar panels, it uses mirrors to focus the Sun's rays towards heating up the molten salt located at the top of the central tower. The heat from the molten salt is then used to turn water into steam to drive turbines. Even after the Sun goes down, the molten salt retains enough heat energy collected during the day to produce electricity even at night.
    1
  24715. China is 3rd country in world to independently launch spacestations of our own, besides USA with Skylab and Soviet Union with Mir spacestations. What harm did Skylab do during its reentry back in 1979? It also create news headlines when it entered Earth's atmosphere.
    1
  24716. India and Pakistan been fighting each other for 70 years. Why continue fighting each other? Both your countries are "brothers" that undergone British colonial rule together. Imagine another 70 years later and your countries still oppose each other. How is Asia going to become strong? China is offering rare opportunities for Pakistan and India to mend their relations through economic corridor project. China also invite India to participate in Belt and Road Initiative too for mutual prosperity.
    1
  24717. 我觉得中国和巴铁有利益也有感情，没利益是假的没感情也是假的。譬如，巴基斯坦把中巴友谊写进了小学课本，他们从小受教育就说中巴友谊，这在世界历史上都很少见。虽然说中国没有像巴基斯坦一样把中巴友谊写进教科书和法律，但是我们能做的就是呼吁大家平等对待巴基斯坦的朋友。
    1
  24718. Total War Fan Pakistan says the same thing about India as well, so both your countries continue to fight each other for another 70 years into the future? Why not mend relations now instead? Look at the Winter Games in Korea and both North and South Korea are discussing participating as single country, despite being enemies, so it's not impossible to take steps to repair your countries relations. China is offering rare opportunity for India to participate in helping develop Pakistan in economic corridor project.
    1
  24719. China is the one committed and working towards denuclearization of Korean Peninsula, not President Trump. If President Trump wants to take all the credit for this, then why did Kim visit Beijing instead of Washington directly?
    1
  24720.  @eleinaedelweiss6215  You said: "But Singapore simply cant exist without its people. theres simply no resources other than humans." You're correct about Singapore, but from what I understand, most developing countries tend have an abundance of natural resources themselves. Granted, some smaller Pacific island nations certainly lack natural resources, but the vast majority of developing countries in Africa, Central Asia and South America, tend to have plenty of natural resources. So logically speaking, wouldn't it make sense for such countries to adopt China's model (bountiful in resources) over Singapore's model (lack of resources)? Otherwise, I don't see your point in advocating that "Honestly developing countries are more looking at Singapore more than China." perhaps you could further elaborate?
    1
  24721. ​ @eleinaedelweiss6215  Under Chairman Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Under Mao, China's life expectancy at birth nearly doubled from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (according Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al.). Under Mao, infant mortality rates halved and illiteracy rates halved. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%.
    1
  24722.  @eleinaedelweiss6215  I'm pointing out China's achievements specifically during the Mao Era (with statistics to boot) yet you're seemingly dismissing all of that? Also, you're going to ignore my question as to why according to you, developing countries are looking towards Singapore and not China, when even you admitted that Singapore lacks natural resources (which I agree) and that many developing countries actually have an abundance of natural resources. It seems the wrong model got developing countries with natural resources to follow Singapore's example when the latter lacks natural resources.
    1
  24723.  @eleinaedelweiss6215  "神州 Shenzhou because to adopt chinas method you need the same circumstances in culture and problems." Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, being invaded by foreign powers like the Eight Nation Alliance, plundering of China's wealth like the ransacking of the Old Summer Palace (圆明园) so if anything, China probably shares the same starting circumstances as many other developing countries like Pakistan, India, etc. Whereas Singapore has limited natural resources (like you said) whereas most developing countries have an abandance of resources (just not easily accessible). Just because it's not easily accessible doesn't mean the resources doesn't exist. The natural resources are there and as long as the technology exists to extract those resources, it's possible that developing countries in Africa and South America can someday harness those resources for themselves. Also, Singapore has population of just 5.6 million, whereas many developing countries have population ranges from 10 million - 100 million, so it doesn't make sense for developing countries to emulate Singapore's model as compared to China's model. Also, you talked about lacking meritocratic culture, but Singapore's culture is also meritocratic (just like China's) so how does your comparison make sense? "Now if you are a developing nation would you try to replicate China or Singapore" I believe I've explained how the circumstances of developing countries are more similar to China's than Singapore's. Perhaps the only thing Singapore has for it, is that it was a former British colony unlike China. But has Singapore truly left the "colonial mentality" behind?
    1
  24724.  @eleinaedelweiss6215  "Look china have a deep history you know your history book and what happens right when a ruler is so efficient, its brutal." Look, many developing countries themselves have long histories being under authoritarian rule of kings, sultans, pharaohs, chieftains and what not, so they actually share more similarities with Chinese history than with Singapore's short history. China has 5,000 years of history and is among the oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Egypt, Mesopotamia and Rome eventually crumbled. China has witnessed the birth and death of nations, the rise and fall of empires, and has survived the course of time to the present day relatively intact. If anything, China is living proof that not all countries have to adopt Western-style democracy to be successful. You said: "and lastly chinas not starting from zero but developing nation just might as well starting from zero" China literally started from zero. At one stage, China was actually poorer than some sub-Saharan African countries. While colonization was brutal for the colonies, there were limited infrastructure works in former colonies, whereas China having no history of colonization, practically meant that China had to start from zero.
    1
  24725.  @eleinaedelweiss6215  You said: "神州 Shenzhou about pakistan you should understand how its wildly different than China's its society is very different than china" Pakistan is arguable even more wildly different from Singapore as compared to China. Pakistan's population is 220 million, Singapore's population is 5.6 million. Pakistan has many natural resources, Singapore doesn't. In fact, China and Pakistan are allies to the point where we call Pakistani our "iron brother" (巴铁) because our bond is as strong as iron. If you ask a developing country like Pakistan if they would like to replicate China's or Singapore's, I'm quite sure they would go with China's.
    1
  24726.  @eleinaedelweiss6215  Singapore's meritocratic system exists because they have a significant Chinese population (around 75%) and this system was inherited from the ancient Chinese Imperial Examination form of governance.
    1
  24727.  @eleinaedelweiss6215  "Singapore have an issue of religious tension in the past so does most developing nation its demographic diversity is an issue as well" While I'd admit that China is 90% Han, Singapore is also around 75% Chinese, so Singapore is only a bit more demographically diverse than China. It doesn't really add credence that developing countries would choose Singapore's model over China's over this criteria. It makes more sense for developing countries to follow China's model given the similarities for the rest of the circumstances like abundance of natural resources and land.
    1
  24728.  @eleinaedelweiss6215  "For a multiethnic like india its not feasible to have a strong state because its region to region needs differ wildly" In that case, Singapore's strong central PAP government is just as ill-suited for India, as China's strong central CPC leadership. However, India shares a similar population size as China as compared to Singapore's population.
    1
  24729.  @eleinaedelweiss6215  "神州 Shenzhou its not the same amount of resources not many nations can even compared to Chinese human resources and natural resources" But you earlier admitted that Singapore has literally zero natural resources, so how is Singapore's a better model than China's for developing countries to emulate? Singapore's population is only 5 million, most developing countries have populations ten times more than that of Singapore's.
    1
  24730.  @eleinaedelweiss6215  "神州 Shenzhou thats why i said the need of nation is different there is no set mold for it and even in democracy theres thousands of derivative of it that can be used for certain nations" But your point was that "Honestly developing countries are more looking at Singapore more than China" when there exists more similarities between China and developing countries, than Singapore with developing countries. In fact, if you look at what's called "Global North" (developed countries) and "Global South" (developing countries), you'll find that Singapore is considered part of the Global North, whereas China is considered part of the Global South. So where are the similarities between Singapore and developing countries, as compared to China and developing countries?
    1
  24731.  @eleinaedelweiss6215  "神州 Shenzhou and btw im not saying Singapore political system is the one size fits all i think you are misunderstanding something " From what I understand, you wrote the words: "Honestly developing countries are more looking at Singapore more than China." yet you fail to adequately explain how are Singapore's circumstances similar to developing countries than China's. -Singapore has no natural resources, whereas many developing countries have an abundance of natural resources. -Singapore has a population of 5 million, whereas many developing countries have populations of in the range of 10 million - 100 million and more. -Singapore has a lack of land, whereas most developing countries have plenty of land. -Singapore's meritocratic system is inherited from the ancient Chinese Imperial Examination system, and is pretty much the same as China's. -Singapore is part of the Global North, whereas China today is still regarded as part of the Global South. .. So honestly speaking, I don't really see the similarities between developing countries' circumstances and Singapore's circumstances, they actually share more in common with China than with Singapore.
    1
  24732.  @eleinaedelweiss6215  Singapore having a lower population means that Singapore has less people to lift out of poverty, whereas China managed to lift 800 million out of poverty in just a few decades. Clearly China's model is more suitable for developing countries, compared to Singapore's. You said: "More resources than Singapore yes but not by much..." Singapore literally has no natural resources, whereas many developing countries have an abundance of resources such as farmland, water, forests, grazing areas, coal, oil, gas, minerals, plants and animals, all of which are absent in Singapore, so how will emulating Singapore's model help these developing countries? As for the Global North and South South, it clear distinguishes Singapore from developing countries and it literally throws your claim that Singapore shares the same circumstances as developing countries out the window. The Global North have been capitalising on the Global South to develop their economies and industries at the expense of the Global South.
    1
  24733.  @eleinaedelweiss6215  How does your blueprint analogy even compare to reality? Singapore's blueprint to success is that they make use of their strategic location to act as a port to connect trade with the East and the West. How can developing countries in Africa, Latin America, etc even follow Singapore's blueprint? Even Singapore's neighbours like Malaysia, Indonesia, etc aren't able to emulate Singapore's model. Singapore's population is just 5 million, so they had less people to lift out of poverty than in other developing countries that have populations ranging from 10 million to 100 million and above. Plus, there's the fact that Singapore has no natural resources, whereas many other developing countries have an abundance of natural resources. It's like you're unable to refute the reality of the situation, so you substitute reality with an oversimplified analogy that's all.
    1
  24734.  @eleinaedelweiss6215  "one of the largest problem indonesian is facing regarding human resources would be brain drain people who learned from foreign countries refused to go back to Indonesia because of corruptions and etc but its getting better now" China also faced this exact problem of brain drain where talented Chinese left China to study overseas and didn't return back. However China's model has resulted in a "reverse brain drain" where immigrants migrate from a developed country to a developing country. Therefore Indonesia actually stands to benefit from learning the Chinese model of how to reverse this brain drain. On the other hand, Singapore's brain drain rate is higher than the global average and doesn't seem to be reversing anytime soon, so how can Indonesia stand to learn from Singapore's model over China's? You said: "Anyway the gov is emulating Singapore quite fine and applying communism in Indonesia is a fools errand." Again, could you please explain how exactly? Singapore has a population of just 5 million, whereas Indonesia is the world's 4th most populous country and actually shares more similarities with China than Singapore in the population aspect. It's like you're unable to explain, you just blurt out Singapore's model is better without going into actual details. You said: "we actually used to have the same systems like you mention and guess what 45 years dictatorship, secret marksman, and Chinese business being forced to some extreme donations to gov, the banning of of Chinese tradition language and culture, the extreme oppression of west papuans." So clearly Indonesia and China share similar histories and similar systems, then how exactly is Singapore model more suitable for Indonesia than China's model? Is it because Soeharto government blamed the "Chinese Problem" (Masalah Cina) that you harbor a dislike towards Chinese?
    1
  24735.  Peter The great  If people in the West are suffering from inflation, higher food and gas prices, then why do they need to contain China? Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing etc cheap so that the cost of living in the West is lower than it should be. Think about the millions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Yet why is it the West is attempting to contain China's rise? It makes no sense.
    1
  24736.  @stopchinesecolonialism172  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  24737.  Charles Schmid  Hitler believed in racial superiority of Aryans and demonized the Jews. But Chairman Mao Zedong actually spoke out against Han Chauvinism (大汉族主义) on March 16, 1953, in order to criticize the ethnocentrism which existed among the dominant Han people of China. In a party directive which was drafted for the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party titled "Criticize Han Chauvinism", Mao said, "In some places, the relations between nationalities are far from normal. For Communists, this is an intolerable situation. We must go to the root and criticize the Han chauvinist ideas which exist to a serious degree among many Party members and cadres ..." Source: Han chauvinism wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_nationalism#Han_chauvinism
    1
  24738.  @stopchinesecolonialism172  Chairman Mao murdered 50 million? China's population in 1950s was around 500 million, so you're saying China lost 10% of our population? Then why is China currently the country with the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people today?
    1
  24739.  @stopchinesecolonialism172  Chairman Mao did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Chairman Mao couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. Yet Western media just label Chairman Mao as mass murderer, when those people starved to death?
    1
  24740.  @valuedcustomer8922  What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    1
  24741. China's government is increasing our military budget, because a strong country with weak army will only invite invasion by other countries (like Britain and Japan in the past)
    1
  24742. +Peta Gonkyi Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia were conquered by Manchu rulers and incorporated into Qing Dynasty China back in the 17th century. What about USA colonizing North America and Hawaii and Guam?
    1
  24743. When the Dalai Lama ruled Tibet, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, with 95% of the population being slaves, the remaining 5% slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil was infertile and difficult to grow crops, so many slaves turned to yak farming to feed the population. Starvation and thievery were commonplace and punishments were harsh, including torture and amputation. Tibet's population back in 1951 was only 1.14 million. Under Chinese rule, the Qinghai-Tibet railway (world's highest elevation railway) was built to connect the normally isolated Tibet to the rest of the world. Tibetans can now import food and technology from the mainland, and Tibetans today have access to food, education, running water, plumbing, gas and electricity. They have access to modern technology like cars, smartphones, computers, WiFi, Internet, etc. Before 1951, Tibet had zero universities, but today there are at least 4 universities set up in Lhasa. Here is a video about a Canadian tourist revisiting Lhasa after 10 years, taking the Qinghai-Tibet railway, and relating how much Tibet has changed since a decade ago. Video: Welcome to Lhasa - Exploring the City (by Vafa Anderson) youtube.com/watch?v=J-TfN56ETVM
    1
  24744. +Byron Greenberg China has never invaded Japan at all in our 5000 years of history (the Mongols tried but fail to invade Japan) so what makes you think Japan will be invaded by China? Japan invaded China 3 times (during Ming dynasty, and 1st Sino-Japanese War, and 2nd Sino-Japanese War) but China invaded Japan 0 times, so what makes you think China will invade Japan?
    1
  24745. +shockwave2291 "神州 Shenzhou I like how this Chinese nationalist tries painting a picture of a 'caring and compassionate' China" China is currently at peace and not at war with any country (since our last major war in 1979) and instead of war, China is building roads, railways, highways, etc, in less-developed countries. How is this "brainwashing" when countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nigeria, Kenya, etc, have benefited from Chinese investment into those countries? Whereas the USA is involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is cutting off those countries heads (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing its own US puppet governments in place. Now USA is eyeing Syria and the Assad Regime is next on the list. If you really think I am "brainwashed" then why don't you point out the flaws in my argument instead?
    1
  24746.  @benzynowypiotrek  Naura has just announced that they are severing diplomatic relations with Taiwan island and is seeking resumption of relations with mainland China.
    1
  24747. Georgia's President has declared that the election illegal, and that she will not be stepping down. And she says she's doing it in the name of "democracy."
    1
  24748.  @alanoh3069  Taiwan only warned of human-to-human transmission back in December 2019, but where's Taiwan's evidence of human-to-human transmission back in 2019? Since Taiwan has not evidence of human-to-human transmission, then why should WHO act on unconfirmed rumours? The first human-to-human transmission case in mainland China was confirmed only on 20th Jan 2020 and that's when the government began implementing quarantine measures shortly after. Source: China confirms human-to-human transmission, says medical workers infected straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/wuhan-virus-cases-hit-217-in-china-as-president-xi-jinping-pledges-to-curb-outbreak (Dated to 20th Jan 2020) If Taiwan had evidence of human-to-human transmission back in December 2019, then why didn't Taiwan present the evidence to WHO?
    1
  24749.  @alanoh3069  This article dated to 18th January 2020, says that WHO did not rule out human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus. But like the article says, there was no evidence of human-to-human transmission prior to 20th Jan 2020, so how can WHO confirm human-to-human transmission without proof? Source: WHO Does Not Rule Out Human to Human Spread of New Coronavirus voanews.com/science-health/who-does-not-rule-out-human-human-spread-new-coronavirus (Dated to 18th Jan 2020) The World Health Organization reports there is no evidence of human-to-human spread of the new coronavirus that has sickened dozens, but says the possibility cannot be ruled out. The first human-to-human transmission case in China was confirmed only on 20th Jan 2020 and that's when the government began implementing quarantine measures shortly after. The WHO and China are acting based on confirmed evidence gleamed from the ground, not rumours and hearsay.
    1
  24750.  @bogartlord7345  China had even less time than other countries to detect the unknown coronavirus, identify it, informed WHO (by 31st Dec 2019) study it, sequenced its genome (by 11th Jan 2020) and share the information with WHO. China bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but what did most Western countries do? They wasted the time that China bought them. Source: China bought the West time to deal with virus but the West squandered it straitstimes.com/opinion/china-bought-the-west-time-the-west-squandered-it
    1
  24751. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  24752. 原来你也懂中文啊？这视频不关南中国海争端，是台湾海峡举行实弹的中国海军演习。所以你评论南中国海争端到底有什么意思？
    1
  24753. 你说演习就在海南岛南边，那海南岛南边是不是中国的领海呢？所以中国有能力保卫中国的领海=海南岛，对不对？中国到底犯了什么罪？ 而且那下楼 Zq Li 说的评论对这题目有什么关系？那是他自己的看法对吗？
    1
  24754. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24755. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  24756. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  24757. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24758. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24759. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24760. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24761. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24762. I'm quite sure that many Americans (but not all) can't even point out where Taiwan island is on the world map. Yet U.S politicians are making Taiwan into America's core interest.
    1
  24763.  @mr.supermanbatman6894  I provided a source to the Treaty of Paris in which Philippine's maritime boundaries were drawn, and they don't include the South China Sea. Also, there is no internationally recognized West Philippines Sea, but the region is known internationally as the South China Sea.
    1
  24764.  @mr.supermanbatman6894  Republic of China published the 11-Dash Line in 1947 claiming the South China Sea islands as within Chinese territory. Whereas the 1898 Treaty of Paris doesn't include the South China Sea islands as within Philippine's territory.
    1
  24765.  @mr.supermanbatman6894  I've looked up the International Court of Justice website, and the ICJ never made a ruling on the South China Sea, what are you talking about? In 2016, the ICJ only had 3 cases, concerning cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race, but nothing about the South China Sea.
    1
  24766.  @mr.supermanbatman6894  The 2016 Hague Ruling was conducted by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) NOT the International Court of Justice. Also, it says that the PCA is not an official UN agency unlike the ICJ, so it's not even endorsed by the UN.
    1
  24767. It's a combination of the Red Scare (phobia of communism) and the Yellow Peril (phobia of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Sinophobic sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, that the notion of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually overtaking the U.S someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    1
  24768. Chinese government is reviving the "Mandate of Heaven" doctrine, in which a competent leader is allowed to remain in power, to maximise the benefits to China, while an incompetent leader will eventually be overthrown by rebellion.
    1
  24769. The U.S leaders have no idea how to solve domestic problems like inflation, gun control, healthcare, so they try to distract their populace by playing up (perceived) external threats.
    1
  24770. American leaders don't know how to solve domestic issues like inflation, gun control and healthcare, so they focus on foreign policy.
    1
  24771.  @rosaliethomson4655  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the USA is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  24772.  @clauderose6333  "神州 Shenzhou Maybe you forget that Peng Shuai said Zhang Gaoli, VICE PRIME MINISTER, forced her had a unwilling sex. it is called rape. Is that still a private thing?" That's a serious accusation, do you have evidence that she said he forced her to have sex unwillingly? I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and she previously had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several years in fact, but where are the allegations of sexual assault in her post? Could you point out where in her post did she ever said that he forced her to have sex unwillingly? On 17th November, Peng Shuai wrote an email to WTA saying that the allegations of sexual assault were not true, and she even criticised the WTA for releasing unverified information without her consent.
    1
  24773.  @clauderose6333  "神州 Shenzhou no means no. and don't forget, Gaoli Zhang is a CCP member and an official, adultery is not allowed." Where did Peng Shuai said no? She eventually agreed in the end, the sex was consensual, here's what she wrote: You said in those seven years, you never forgot about me, and you will treat me well etc... I was terrified and anxious. Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well. We talking about recent history, as well as ancient eras. You educated me on so many topics, and we had discussions about economics, politics. We never ran out of things to talk about. We played chess, sang, played table tennis, played pool and also played tennis together. We always had endless fun. It was as if our personalities fit perfectly together. So where are the allegations of sexual assault in Peng Shuai's post? Also, Zhang Gaoli is an retired communist party member now.
    1
  24774.  @clauderose6333  "神州 Shenzhou Sorry, I don't have miracle to cure a blind people. You should go to hospital, not YouTube." Neither do I have a miracle for blind people. I'm telling you that there are no allegations of sexual assault in Peng Shuai's post (go ahead and point them out to me if you can) but you just blindly believe that there is sexual assault in her post when there is none. And I have quoted Peng Shuai's words that the sex was consensual. But the blind person here refuse to see those words for what it is. Peng Shuai even confirmed this on 17 Nov, when she wrote an email to WTA stating that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    1
  24775.  @clauderose6333  Here's an interview with Peng Shuai by a reporter from Singapore newspaper Lianhe Zaobao and she denies the accusation of sexual assault in her post. Video:youtu.be/ZF9Owb9uSOE
    1
  24776.  @williamplayfair364  How am I spreading disinformation? I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and she actually consented to sex in her post. Peng Shuai wrote: Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well."
    1
  24777.  @clauderose6333  Peng Shuai was interviewed by Singaporean Lianhe Zaobao and she denies the allegations of sexual assault. She said in Mandarin: "I have never said or written that anyone has sexually assaulted me, I have to clearly stress this point", and that there had been misunderstandings about her post on Weibo. Here's the whole interview Video:youtu.be/ZF9Owb9uSOE
    1
  24778.  @clauderose6333  You can't even refute my points, so you resort to personal insults instead.
    1
  24779.  @clauderose6333  "神州 Shenzhou Refuse?" Did I ever mention this word 'Refuse' at all?
    1
  24780.  @clauderose6333  Where did she say she's unwilling? According to Peng Shuai's post, she consented to sex, she wrote: Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well." And Peng Shuai has appeared in an interview with Singapore newspaper Lianhe Zaobao where she again denies the allegation of sexual assault. She said in Mandarin: "I have never said or written that anyone has sexually assaulted me, I have to clearly stress this point", and that there had been misunderstandings about her post on Weibo. Video:youtu.be/ZF9Owb9uSOE But it's like you act blind and pretend not to see the fact that there are no allegations of sexual assault, and Peng Shuai isn't even pressing charges for crying out loud.
    1
  24781. These Hong Kong rioters resort to violence, arsonism, vandalism, hurling petrol bombs, breaking building windows, security cameras, traffic lights and damaging Hong Kong MTR stations, setting shops on fire. Why can't the Hong Kong Police beat up these criminals and arrest them?
    1
  24782.  @plc3653  Consider this question: Who is more qualified to lead the country? The People or The Government? (If you selected The People, then why do countries still need The Government then?)
    1
  24783. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24784. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24785. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  24786. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24787. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24788. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24789. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  24790. If you give the ordinary citizen the right to vote, then you know ordinary citizen do? They do things like vote for people like Donald Trump, who has zero political experience, and just seduce voters into supporting him with false promises of making America great again. If ordinary people aren't politically savvy enough to vote responsibly, then why should they interfere with the important political decisions? In China, if ordinary citizen wants to influence politics, they join the communist party (which has strict criteria) and rise from the ranks while garnering votes from other politically savvy party members. Its not perfect system, but it has produced leaders like Xi Jinping, who is willing to tackle corruption in the government, so why not leave him in power for longer period, to maximise his benefits to China?
    1
  24791. Joe Biden actually voted for the Iraq War, whereas Trump has called Iraq War the "biggest mistake in US history."
    1
  24792.  @intothewrx  Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  24793.  @KIMJUNGEUNism  If China can someday surpass the United States as the premier world superpower in the future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this eventual goal? Why should China be forced to abandon our political system and adopt Western liberal democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    1
  24794. In fact, US has welcomed a grand total of zero Uighur refugees since 2021.
    1
  24795. 在哪里生活着，过着过着，时间飞逝了。
    1
  24796. China looks forward to the year 2050, where it's predicted to overtake the US. USA looks back to the year 1950, when they just beginning their rise as a superpower
    1
  24797.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou Saudi would be a poor country without oil." But the very fact that Saudi oil exists clearly disproves that countries need to adopt Western-style democracy to be successful. Natural resources do matter, unlike what Barton Lee clearly prescribed.
    1
  24798.  @Andy-P  "So warring states wasn't a series of civil wars?" Post-Qin warring states like Three Kingdoms and the Seven Kingdoms could be classified as civil wars meant to reunify a divided China.
    1
  24799.  @Andy-P  You said: "So why not go the whole way and have private property - not just lease hold if it automatically renews?" This is not a good idea. What happens if Chinese property owners sell our lands to foreigners? What if they purchase those lands only to let them remain fallow and undeveloped? Or what if they build houses but only them rent out to foreigners? Or perhaps transfer land ownership to foreign governments, who may use those land for military purposes? Having a 70-year lease at least allows the Chinese government to maintain a degree of control over our lands and to monitor the land development every 70 years or so.
    1
  24800.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou Hi Friend Shenzhou, so nice to see you here again in the Chinese Nationalist Echo-Chambre (CNEC)." You yourself are present in this comment thread, so does that mean that you are calling yourself a Chinese nationalist?
    1
  24801.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou The Supreme Court did not overturn the righty to an abortion." They did. Previously, American women had the constitutional right to an abortion, now this right has been taken from them. And yet Mark Yeung talked about "checks and balances" but he's been silent on this matter, so how is his analysis good?
    1
  24802.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou My CNEC friend, the worship of the past is a common thread among nationalists everywhere." Historians also study the past in an attempt to understand countries, does that make them all nationalists? As a Chinese, I've simply pointed out that China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization today, when other ancient civilizations like Rome, Egypt, Mesopotamia have since succumbed to history, yet you're labelling me a nationalist for my views?
    1
  24803.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou MY CNEC friend, I am not a supporter of the United States in any way." But whenever I mention the U.S, you seem to leap to its defense on many occasions previously during our discussions, yet now you claim you're not a supporter? Additionally, whenever I bring up China's achievements, you just call me a nationalist, just for being proud of my own nation? I've never resorted to calling you by any other names, but on the other hand, you take every opportunity to label me a nationalist for my views
    1
  24804.  @bartonlee3594  The right to an abortion is a constitutional right in the United States, yet the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade. And you said you "disagree with the decision to let states chose." then does that mean you don't support the so-called "checks and balances" that Mark Yeung talks about?
    1
  24805.  @Andy-P  Yes. I've heard many complaints from places like Australia, US and the UK, that Chinese investors are buying up property and driving up housing prices in the process. But they themselves put those land up for sale, and it so happens that many buyers are Chinese, yet somehow the Chinese are being blamed for purchasing what's for sale?
    1
  24806.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Otherwise no one here can read the other side of story or new perspectives. FACT" Wrong. Already on this comment thread, there are other sides of the story and new perspectives being provided by users such as Mark Yeung and Andy-P.
    1
  24807.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "HeHe. Yes, Argentina was the breadbasket of the world during both world wars but hasn't done much since aside from its great literary culture." Why is it that you can boast about your home country, Argentina, with pride, but whenever I do the same for my home country of China, you label me a Chinese nationalist?
    1
  24808.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou My friend, there is nothing wrong with patriotism." So when you boast about Argentina, that's considered patriotism? Why do you keep on calling me CNEC...CNEC...CNEC? You boasted about your own home country of Argentina, but when I do the same for my own country, you label me a Chinese Nationalist.
    1
  24809.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "The problem: you are AFRAID to criticize anything about YOUR own country?" Wrong! I've previously expressed criticism towards my country in previous discussions with you, but you simply ignored it, then how am I being a Chinese Nationalist? You incessantly resort to hurling personal insults against me for my beliefs, yet you can boast about your own home country of Argentina, but don't permit me to do the same?
    1
  24810.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "But you said: abortion became illegal. That is not true." It's clearly true. Abortion is illegal in California, Michigan, Vermont and other states in the United States, so how is this statement not true?
    1
  24811.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "HEY CYRRUS, care to step in here and tell him that I am right?" It's astonishing that you have no qualms about denigrating Cyrus's channel as a "Chinese Nationalist Echo Chamber", yet now you're asking for affirmation from him? And I've already shown that this is Not an Echo Chamber, there have been different points of views expressed by users such as Mark Yeung, Andy-P and others.
    1
  24812.  @bartonlee3594  轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  24813. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24814.  @bartonlee3594  It's tragic that you don't like your own home country of Argentina, and left it for Canada. But I grew up in China although times were difficult, China had transformed from a previously dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy (world's largest if you go by GDP PPP), the factory of the world (i.e Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army (i.e the People's Liberation Army). And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the communist party of China. Therefore, I was raised to see the potential in political systems that are different from Western-style democracies. whereas you appear to be close-minded to alternative forms of governance.
    1
  24815.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "You are a typical nationalists here in the echo-chamber." Again, why are you labeling me a Chinese Nationalist, simply because I grew up in China, and experienced China's massive transformation from a previously dirt-poor, starving country in the past, into an economic juggernaut and manufacturing hub? You may have a bad experience with your own home country of Argentina, but we Chinese have found our standards of living vastly improved while under the leadership of the communist party of China. If anything, it looks as though you can't stomach the though of a rising China that's all, that's why you label anyone who expresses positive views about China here as "Chinese Nationalists". Then if anything aren't you perhaps being close-minded to alternative views?
    1
  24816.  @bartonlee3594  Since you claimed that you and two others are rebutting Cyrus, that proves his channel doesn't fit your definition of an echo chamber.
    1
  24817.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou western governments should ban land sales to Chinese nationals" That's clearly a racist policy, specifically singling out Chinese nationals just for purchasing what's for sale. Why not apply it to all nationalities instead of just Chinese?
    1
  24818.  @bartonlee3594  "You don't understand what an echo-chambre is. It is a place where everybody agrees with everybody else and everyone reconfirms their prejudices." Yeah but since not everybody on Cyrus' channel agrees with everybody else, then his channel clearly doesn't fit your definition of an echo chamber. After all, you and at least two others clearly don't agree with him.
    1
  24819.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou I agree. Major economic development." China achieved this major economic development without adopting Western style democracy and while under the leadership of the communist party of China, then why should China get rid our the government that lifted China out of poverty? Because people like you say so?
    1
  24820.  @bartonlee3594  "You have reached the stage where that middle-class throws off its authoritarian masters." Why? If the Chinese people throw off the Chinese government, that would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, possibly wiping away the past decades of progress and development in our country, setting China back to the stone ages, so why should Chinese people do that? Because you say so? So it appears that you can't stomach the though of a rising China that's all, that's why you label anyone who expresses positive views about China here as "Chinese Nationalists", because China is successful under the communist party of China.
    1
  24821.  @bartonlee3594  "You have reached the stage where that middle-class throws off its authoritarian masters." Why? If the Chinese people throw off the Chinese government, that would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, possibly wiping away the past decades of progress and development in our country, setting China back to the stone ages, so why should Chinese people do that? Because you say so?
    1
  24822.  @bartonlee3594  "You have reached the stage where that middle-class throws off its authoritarian masters." Excuse me, but why should the Chinese middle-class throw off the government? Doing so would plunge our country into civil strife, possibly wiping away the progress and development of the past decades, so why should the people of China do that? Because you say so?
    1
  24823.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "You have reached the stage where that middle-class throws off its authoritarian masters." Why should Chinese do that? That would send China back to the stone ages, possibly wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country.
    1
  24824.  @bartonlee3594  "You have reached the stage where that middle-class throws off its authoritarian masters." Why should Chinese people do that? China's system clearly works for China then why should we abandon our system just because you say so? Who do you think you are?
    1
  24825.  @bartonlee3594  It's alarming that you, having abandoned your own home country of Argentina for Canada, are now advocating for the Chinese middle-class to overthrow the Communist Party of China, when China has achieved remarkable progress and development under the leadership of the CPC. Why are you seemingly so upset that a country like China can succeed without ever adopting Western-style democracy? Are you so close-minded to alternative forms of government apart from Western-style democracy?
    1
  24826.  @bartonlee3594  I've already said that China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, isn't this already criticising my country? Yet China has since transformed into an economic juggernaut, the manufacturing hub of the world, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, so why should China abandon this political system? Because you say so?
    1
  24827.  @bartonlee3594  We've already shown that Cyrus' channel doesn't fit your definition of an echo chamber, since not everyone in this channel agrees with Cyrus Janssen, then why are you still calling it CNEC when it's already disproven? You and at least two others in this channel disagree with Cyrus after all.
    1
  24828.  @bartonlee3594  "神州 Shenzhou CNEC is for real, my friend. Everybody who posts here agrees with CPC policy about everything." That's blatantly false. We've already proven this wrong, since people like you and two other posters clearly do not agree with the CPC policy about everything. Therefore, Cyrus' channel doesn't fit your definition of an echo chamber, yet why are you trying to enforce this definition onto his channel?
    1
  24829.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Thee is no open debate, no discusssion (except by me and two other posters)." This statement of yours already contradicts itself. There is clearly open debate and discussion among me, you and two other posters. In fact, as of now this thread is reaching almost 200 replies yet you claim there is no open debate and no discussion?
    1
  24830.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Hence, this website reinforces a nationalist view." Cyrus' video contains the message of Building Bridges, Not Walls, between the U.S and China. In his videos, Cyrus' vision is that if US and China cooperate, then the whole world benefits, and many people agree with this view, so how is it reinforcing a nationalist view?
    1
  24831.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "And nationalists (like you) reinforce each other." More accusations? Could you point out which Chinese Nationalist have I been reinforcing in the comments? On the other hand, you've been constantly reinforcing and agreeing with the others in this thread, then perhaps (just perhaps) are you stuck in an echo chamber of your own creation? After all, you keep on agreeing with those same few people, so doesn't this fit your own definition of an Echo Chamber?
    1
  24832.  @bartonlee3594  You yourself never answered any of my questions, why should I continue answering yours? You yourself claimed that you were raised to hate authoritarian government, then no matter how successful China is under the communist party, you're just going to perceive it negatively that's all.
    1
  24833.  @bartonlee3594  We've already dismantled the notion of Cyrus' channel being a so-called NEC. There exists discussion among me, you and two other posters and clearly not everybody here agrees with CPC policy about everything, so Cyrus channel doesn't fit your definition of an echo-chamber.
    1
  24834.  @Andy-P  I had the opportunity to study abroad so I learned English to act as a bridge between the two cultures, but I was appalled at how China is being portrayed in the West. Whenever I bring up China's achievements to them, they just laughed at me, called me brainwashed and some even told me to "Go back to China is you like it there!". This coming from people who probably never actually set foot in China and seen what life in China is really like.
    1
  24835.  @bartonlee3594  "I wasn't referring to you in that post, I was talking about markyeung" Mark Yeung lives in Canada, why are claiming he doesn't have access to global data?
    1
  24836.  @bartonlee3594  "We are going around in a circle..." At least both of us agree that China's experienced massive economic development. Yet this was achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, so does that fact change your view of hating authoritarian systems? Otherwise, why would you advocate for the middle class to throw off the govt?
    1
  24837.  @Andy-P  There is no problem with how the West is portrayed in China, but there is a problem with how China is being portrayed in the West. Therefore, I seek to build a bridge in that area.
    1
  24838.  @bartonlee3594  What do you want to discuss then? Why is it that you advocate for the middle-class to throw off the government, when China's system has shown be suitable for our country?
    1
  24839.  @bartonlee3594  The one who's not a free thinker is the one raised to hate authoritarian government, and is unable to accept that a country can prosper and thrive under such a system. He is so closed minded that he's not open to the idea of an alternative system of government.
    1
  24840.  @bartonlee3594  You claim he has access to a lot of things, then why'd you claim he doesn't have access to global data?
    1
  24841.  @bartonlee3594  "I do not "hate" authoritarian governments" You did wrote earlier that you were "raised to hate authoritarian government." But if you do not hate them, then why is it when a country with an authoritarian government becomes successful, that you label its people as Nationalists, just for defending our way of life? Aren't you doing the same when you defend democratic countries?
    1
  24842.  @bartonlee3594  China sees on average some 500 protests every day. In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010. (or an average of 493 protests every day in 2010). ... Source: Wikipedia: Protest and dissent in China Yet why do you keep on claiming that no one in China is allowed to disagree with the government?
    1
  24843.  @bartonlee3594  We agree in growing the middle class, but why do you advocate for them to throw off the government? That would send our country into civil strife, possibly putting an end to the previous decades of peace and progress in our country. Why would you advocate for such a catastrophic event to occur in China?
    1
  24844.  @bartonlee3594  China sees on average some 500 protests every day. In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010. (or an average of 493 protests every day in 2010). ... Source: Wikipedia: Protest and dissent in China
    1
  24845. Meanwhile, Western journals continue to predict an economic hard landing for China. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face a hard landing 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks a Soft Economic Landing 2003. New York Times: Banking crisis imperils China 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover 2010: Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China 2011: Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think 2012: American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing 2013: Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing 2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown 2020. NYT: Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak 2021 Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize 2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n 2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.
    1
  24846. The United State's playbook is target the neighbouring countries next to Russia and China, overthrow their governments and installing pro-Washington candates into power. Failing that, U.S reduces those countries to an unstable state in other to cause more troubles for their neighbors Russia and China.
    1
  24847. India and USA will probably destroy their own economies first, the way things are going.
    1
  24848. Workers are on strike in the West.
    1
  24849.  @jacobzhong3971  原来如此，我以为你在说西方文章。
    1
  24850. China actually has shortage of police officers with 143 officers per 100,000 people, below the international median of 300 officers per 100,000 people. That's where surveillance systems come into play.
    1
  24851. Oppressing? Prior to the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was British colony and the 1956 HK riots resulted in 59 deaths while the 1967 HK riots resulted in 51 deaths. Yet after the handover back to mainland China, today's 2019 HK riots resulted in zero deaths thus far, so aren't the Hong Kong Police showing incredible restraint here? Despite being under severe stress, physical and mental fatigue after months of protests, and facing public humiliation by the protestors and the foreign journalists?
    1
  24852. Why are you accusing me of being 50 cents? When did I ever said anything about the Chinese Communist Party here in this thread?
    1
  24853.  @williamscanlon5343  In 1958 the Yellow River flooded which coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. In July 1958, the peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 m3/s (790,000 cu ft/s) with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kg/m3 (57 lb/cu ft), 14× and 24× their mean annual values, respectively. The flood water level was so high that it rose up to the top of the levee in several places. This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. It was reported as the most severe flood since 1933. As a result, there was poor harvests and mass starvation ensued.
    1
  24854.  @eszterfodor1136  Yes indeed, we should be worried that we don't understand what the West is thinking. They've got access to nukes after all.
    1
  24855. ​ @eszterfodor1136  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24856. Its other country's loss if they think that they shouldn't invest in less developed countries. 30 years ago, China was also a starving, war-torn, dirt poor, country too, but look at China now, being world's 2nd largest economy.
    1
  24857.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou So, is it OK for US navy to fry fighter jets JUST OUTSIDE CHINESE WATERS everyday ?" The problem is that U.S warships entered within 12 nautical miles of Chinese waters. For example: 2016: USS Curtis Wilbur sailed to within 12 NM of Paracel Islands. 2017: USS Stethem sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands. 2018: USS Higgins and the USS Antietam sailed to within 12NM of Paracel Islands. .... Whereas mainland PLAAF fighter jets were in international airspace and didn't fly over Taiwan.
    1
  24858.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou what about the demands for other Hong Kong people? Any dialog?" Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam wanted to negotiate with the Hong Kong protestors, but the Hong Kong protestors refused dialogue and negotiation they only wanted their demands to be met. Some of their demands (such as releasing all previously arrested rioters) were unreasonable. Video: Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam says she’s open to dialogue with protesters youtu.be/mwg6bkeTpY4
    1
  24859.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou The majority of Taiwanese people support the status quoted, despite the warmongering actions by Beijing. I agree with you" And the status quo according to Taiwan's constitution is that Taiwan is part of China so doesn't that mean that the people of Taiwan want the island to remain part of China (in accordance with Taiwan constitution) and not declare independence? And again how is Beijing warmongering by flying fighter jets in international space?
    1
  24860.  @MarkYeung1  About Peng Shuai's disappearance, this is similar to Fan Bingbing's earlier disappearance, only to reappear in public with a statement that she's being fined for tax evasion. Similarly, Jack Mar disappeared from the public view for some time, but has since reappeared. Peng Shuai hurled a serious accusation against a high ranking communist party member so there is ongoing investigations by the authorities to determine the veracity of her claims.
    1
  24861.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Did she dialog? You said no and blame it on the protesters, but she DID." Where's the dialog between Carrie Lam and the 2019 Hong Kong protestors?
    1
  24862.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou September 26th, 2019. Look it up yourself." That dialogue is a community dialogue between the Hong Kong government and community members, but there weren't any representatives from the Hong Kong protestors showed up to the dialogue. And already Carrie Lam cancelled the Hong Kong Extradition Bill that started this whole mess, yet the Hong Kong protestors made unreasonable demand like "freeing all those arsonist, looters and rioters". Because the HK extradition bill was scrapped, now a Hong Kong murderer is loose in Hong Kong and there is no justice for the victim's family.
    1
  24863.  @MarkYeung1  You use cartoon animation to explain the Great Leap Forward? In 1958 the Yellow River flooded that coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. In July 1958, the peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 m3/s (790,000 cu ft/s) with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kg/m3 (57 lb/cu ft), 14× and 24× their mean annual values, respectively. The flood water level was so high that it rose up to the top of the levee in several places. This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages.
    1
  24864.  @MarkYeung1  Peng Shuai is being investigated just like how Fan Bingbing was investigated and fined for tax evasion. If those sexual assault allegations by Peng Shuai turned out to be false, then it would be a serious breach of the law to accuse a high ranking communist official of sexual assault, that's why the investigations are still ongoing. I mean, not long ago, anti-China people were bringing up "Where's Jack Ma?" now that he has reappeared, they switch to a different person another day. It's the same old tactic.
    1
  24865.  @dflatt1783  "神州 Shenzhou Blah Blah Blah They know what will happen to them if they violate the air space of a sovereign country." Again, show me where did PLAAF fighter jets violate the airspace of another sovereign country? Chinese jets flew in international airspace. This video explains where exactly PLAAF jets flew and they did not violate anyone's airspace youtu.be/_c9qu1gxzOI
    1
  24866.  @dflatt1783  "Yet another indication of weakness." You keep claiming Taiwan is independent and not under CPC control, then why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations and the World Health Organization? Any independent country should be able to join the UN and WHO without any problems, but is there some force that stopping Taiwan from joining the UN and WHO? Then Taiwan clearly isn't independent after all.
    1
  24867.  @seniorsergeanttomcroydon6401  "Like I said I'm so lucky I don't work with you, you'd be performance managed out of a job for non-performance. In my job copying and pasting doesn't work. Real hard gruelling analytical capability is required. You'd be fundamentally suited to basic tasks" Because all you done is regurgitate what the Western anti-China MSM feeds you to? What "grueling analysis" did you even do? You just verbally insult me just because my views happen to differ from yours.
    1
  24868.  @JHeb_  In your other post you wrote: "The same goes for China. China itself is old, the CC///P is younger than most countries on Earth, barely getting more than a hundred years. CC///P politics are much more different than any government systems they had before. This is why I find your comparison of "whereas even Rome eventually crumbled." a very funny one, which shows your inconsequence and lack of general historical knowledge." China's current political system closely resembles the authoritarian Imperial System of China under the Emperor and the Imperial Court. At least closer than any "Western Brand of Democracy" which is a foreign concept to China, since we never truly had liberal democracy like in the West in China. Then for what reason should China abandon our current system (which works) for something that potentially won't work?
    1
  24869.  @JHeb_  In that other post you wrote: "So if we stick to actual history, then you will see EVERY total///itarian regime eventually collapse under its weight and pressure on the people. Third Reich, Soviet Union, and soon it will be time for Com///munist China, and hopefully, the collapse of the CC///P will be also the collapse of the last major total///itarian world power in the history of humanity." But history has shown that proto-democracies like Republic of Rome also collapsed, then what makes you think Liberal Democracy is the best form of governance when it has only 100-200 years of history, compared to 1000-2000 years of human history being under authoritarian rule?
    1
  24870.  @MarkYeung1  Carrie Lam didn't want to scrap the Hong Kong Extradition Bill because it was the right thing to have the extradition treaty so that that Hong Kong murderer who killed his pregnant girlfriend in Taiwan could be extradited to Taiwan to face justice for his crimes. Now that the bill is scrapped, a Hong Kong murder roams free, while there is no justice for the victim's family members.
    1
  24871.  @JHeb_  You wrote in ""most of humanity lived under an authoritarian government of sorts" this is an example of pure traditionalism. Argument that in no way proves that such a system is good. Especially considering modern, globalized times. Most of humanity lived in awful conditions for most of the history, so you could find corelation in that as well." It shows that authoritarian governments were basically the norm throughout most of history, Democracy wasn't even popular outside of Greece, Rome and most ancient countries had one of the authoritarian systems I mentioned. And even in modern democracies like India (world's largest democracy) living conditions are awful for the poor, so how does this justify that Western brand of democracy is better? Comparing liberal democratic India to China under communist party rule, it's apparent that you can better living conditions without having Western brand of democracy.
    1
  24872.  @JHeb_  You wrote: "So stable that during these times wars were basically a normal part of life, happening basically all the time. So stable that vast majority of these systems didn't live to modern times or lost most of its power. Mostly thanks to the power of people, who regained it from corrupted few." Wars are still happening today even under Western democracy, take the warmongering United States of America for example, they have been involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Yemen War, you just name it. And Western democracy was basically forced onto colonies by colonial powers, that's the reason why India, Singapore, Hong Kong and other former colonies had such a system. Doesn't necessarily mean that liberal democracy is better.
    1
  24873.  @JHeb_  In your other post you wrote: "All of these minorities were or still are a subject of genocides, rapes and political prisoners. Obvious proof of that are large amount of people who witnessed and experienced the tota///litarian reg///ime on their skin. Denying that would be ignorance in this case. You can not possibly assume every single one of them is lying or being western spy." What genocide are you talking about? The ethnic minority population in China actually grown from 6.1% in 1953, to 8.04% in 1990, 8.41% in 2000, 8.49% in 2010 and 8.89% in 2020.
    1
  24874.  @JHeb_  In your other post you wrote: "This is a disgusting justification of tot///alitarian regimes. The profit is generated by what people want. Sometimes however there are bigger players than the people, like CC///P which can change that and tell youtube to adjust some comments to fit their wishes." What makes you claim the CPC can tell YouTube to adjust comments to fit their wishes? Earlier you explicitly said: "Major difference is that YouTube is not a state-run media. It is private company." then how is the CPC able to influence YouTube? If YouTube is censoring comments in pursuit of profits, then it clearly proves that "profits aren't generated by what people want", companies like YouTube choose profit over what people want.
    1
  24875.  @JHeb_  In your other post: "You say that like CC///P got some objective moral truth and has a moral high ground, which is a completely delusional and fanatic assumption. You present generalization and typical CC///Ps propaganda. Please, see some real world for once." How is it delusional and fanatic assumption? Over the past 40 years, China has lifted over 800 million people out of poverty and into the middle class. According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to 0.7% in 2015. According UNESCO, China's literacy rate has developed from 79% in 1982 to 97% in 2010, indicating that almost one million people per year had become literate over three decades. Have you actually been to China and see what the real China is like for once?
    1
  24876.  @JHeb_  In your other post: "China controls everything.. This is why it is called a totalitarianism. Every aspect of citizens life is controlled "for their good". Totalitarianism was used to reach utopia without crimes and injustice. Guess what happened to every power that tried to achieve it, and there is no reason at all to believe that China will be different in this case." What makes you think China can control every aspect of citizens lives? Think of the huge costs and resources necessary to control everything that 1.4 billion (approx) people do everyday and where does China have the resources to do that? Have you actually been to China and seen what the real China is like for yourself?
    1
  24877.  @MarkYeung1  But like I said earlier, in China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, reining in companies when they gone too far. Whereas in the United States, the rich U.S corporations can get away with anything and they control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    1
  24878.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou even the Beijing government said poor planning is the main reason for the failure of the Great leap forward." That's the Great Leap Forward, but since we are talking about Great Chinese Famine, before the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 was founded, there were already numerous famines under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period, such as the 1920–1921 North China famine, 1920–1921 North China famine, 1936–1937 Sichuan-Gansu famine, 1942–1943 Henan famine, and so on. But after the Great Chinese Famine, no more famines have occurred in China under the Communist Party of China since.
    1
  24879.  @jimmychow9092  Chinese conviction rate 99% implies that Chinese arrest the correct criminals and leave the innocent alone. Look, Japan has conviction rate exceeding 99%, and Canada conviction rate is 97% too.
    1
  24880.  @jimmychow9092  Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou was arrested back in 2018, yet why haven't they started her trial yet? Her hearing is scheduled for January 2020? Is it because they can't find any evidence against Meng, so they need to buy time to fabricate fake evidence against her?
    1
  24881. Russian engineers face a disadvantage over Chinese engineers, for the simple fact that Chinese engineers have intimate knowledge of Russian military hardware, whereas Russian engineers may know know much about China's.
    1
  24882. +Spiffy Brit One moment you said Soviet "relics" are long lasting, then they are unreliable next moment? Chinese military hardware combines aspects of Soviet design with our own modern military elements as well.
    1
  24883. China has whole list of jet engines according to (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_aircraft_engines ) But since Russia and China are allies to the point where it is unlikely war will break out between our countries, it is more economical to save costs by using Russian jet engines for the time being.
    1
  24884. @Jelly Subway Trump's tariffs won't last forever you know, and eventually even President Trump himself will have to step down as president once his term limits have been reached. And the next US president might just start reversing Trump's policies and lift the trade war, thus possibly resulting in a future economic boom for China, as US-China trade relations resume their previous pre-tradewar levels. Who knows?
    1
  24885.  @PhotographsbyKristoferOngNewYo  Because Pelosi's visit has clearly jeopardized peace and put all of us living here in the region in potential danger. Was Pelosi's visit even necessary in the first place? What was the purposes of such a visit?
    1
  24886.  @stunriver  Pelosi also remarked that the 2019 Hong Kong riots were "a beautiful sight to behold".
    1
  24887.  @buckygoldstein9256  "Chiang Kai-shek never "bend to the wishes of" Hirohito." Chiang kai-Shek even served in the Japanese Army from 1909 to 1911. He purged communists from KMT and their removal of Communists from within the ranks allowed him free reign to give himself what amounted to dictatorial power over much of China. When the Japanese invaded Manchuria, Chiang refused to face the Japanese invaders, until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap him to get him to ally with the communists in a united front against the Japanese. (Xi'an Incident) Additionally, the Communists actually saved his leadership, and it’s often forgotten that without the Communists’ help, Chiang would never have survived as a political force, since was the communists who convinced the officers to release Chiang and allow him to take control of the government once again. Chiang’s efforts against the Japanese gained him some influential friends. And although the Communist General Mao was responsible for much of the damage inflicted upon the Japanese, it was Chiang who got the credit mainly from Britain and the US. When civil war broke out in China, Chiang expected help from the allies, but after a long campaign against both the Japanese and the Germans, the US and Britain were reluctant to get involved in a civil war. His Western ‘friends’ literally abandoned him. He suppressed local culture in Taiwan (White Terror) and was responsible for the imprisonment of 140,000 Taiwanese. These people were taken captive for their alleged opposition to the KMT. At this time, anyone openly criticizing the ruling party was deemed a Communist sympathizer. He held the Taiwan presidency for 25 years. He held the Taiwan under a permanent state of martial law, thus ensuring his power was absolute. In fact, the constitution only allowed for two terms in power, but with martial law as his excuse, Chiang could rule indefinitely. Source: Culture Trip: 11 Things You Should Know About Chiang Kai-shek
    1
  24888.  @buckygoldstein9256  "神州 Shenzhou (what was the purpose of Pelosi's visit) I would ask you why China wuld say that Australia's purchase of nuclear powered (not nuclear armed) submarines was “extremely irresponsible”." Australia's purchase of nuclear subs is a violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) much like Pelosi's visit was of the One China Policy that U.S recognizes. Taiwan wasn't even on Pelosi's itinerary so she basically sneaked into Taiwan. You said: "Australia purchased these subs partly because of worsening relations with China and China has nuclear subs." Australia might develop the capability to refine civilian-grade nuclear fuel into weapons-grade nuclear material for possible use in nuclear weapons. China has nuclear subs because we are a recognized nuclear nation under NPT, but Australia isn't, so are you saying that other countries can just acquire nuclear subs just because of "worsening relations"? You said: "Is China (President Xi) afraid that Australia will be able to defend itself against a Chinese attack?" Why would China even want to attack Australia? If anything, it's Australian warships that are traveling to the South China Sea and East China Sea. You said: "As I've said (another western saying) "What's good for the goose is good for the dictator." ;-)" There's also another saying where one is comparing apples to oranges.
    1
  24889.  @buckygoldstein9256  "神州 Shenzhou (PRC in UN, ROC out) That changed once, it can change again." Taiwan attempting to retake the mainland would be as in Chinese saying: "A snake wanting to swallow an elephant" (蛇欲吞象). You said: "Since Taiwan is a major technological power," Taiwan is not as technologically advanced as mainland China. Let's take supercomputers for example, and China is home to one of top 10 world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway TaihuLight (神威·太湖之光). In the TOP500 fastest supercomputers, China ranks top in the world with 173 supercomputers, compared to U.S at number two with 149 supercomputers. Distribution of supercomputers in the TOP500 list by country (as of November 2021) 1. China (173) 2. United States (149) 3. Japan (32) 4. Germany (26) 5. France (19) 6. Canada (11) 7. United Kingdom (11) 8. South Korea (7) 9. Russia (7) 10. Italy (6) ... Source: TOP500 But where are the supercomputers from Taiwan as compared to mainland China? You said: "after the US moves most of it's manufacturing to India." Are Indian workers willing to work for the same low wages as Chinese workers? Also, how will India ship their Made-in-India goods back to America? China's infrastructure (i.e ports) is able to handle the sheer amount of Chinese goods going to other countries, that's why China is home to many of the world's busiest ports like Ningbo-Zhousan, Shanghai, Tangshan, Guangzhou, Qingdao, etc.
    1
  24890.  @buckygoldstein9256  "神州 Shenzhou (UN General Resolution 2758) Repeating yourself over and over doesn't make you right." I'm willing to hear you out. Could you point out which part of UN General Resolution 2758 is wrong?
    1
  24891.  @buckygoldstein9256  "神州 Shenzhou (one China) When the US said that there was only one China and that included China on both sides of the Taiwan Strait in 1972, that was to appease the PRC." Well, then you've proven that PRC is more important to the U.S policy than the ROC, that they would continue recognizing the One China policy that Taiwan is part of China. You said: "The US never actually supported the actual unification of China." Yes, they only want to use the island as a chess piece to contain the mainland's rise. Just like the U.S is using Ukraine to contain Russia.
    1
  24892.  @buckygoldstein9256  "神州 Shenzhou (one China) Again, repeating yourself doesn't make you right." I implore you then, to point out which part of UN General Resolution 2758 is wrong? You said: "One of the most striking differences between a cat and a lie is that a cat has only nine lives." Can anyone can even kill a cat more than once, let alone nine times? And it's not as though what I've said is a lie, it's a fact that UN countries democratically voted to recognize PRC and kick Taiwan out of the UN through the results of Resolution 2758.
    1
  24893.  @buckygoldstein9256  You said: "Between 1958 and 1962, 45 million people starved to death in China as the result of the largest socialist experiment in history." So you're saying that from 1958 to 1962, 45 million starved to death in China? According to Population Pyramid, China's population was 612,241,552 in 1955 and by 1960, China's population was 660,408,054, having increased by 48,166,502 in just 5 years.. China's Population (1950-1970) 1950: 554,419,268 1955: 612,241,552 1960: 660,408,054 1965: 724,218,970 1970: 827,601,385 ... Source: Population Pyramid So you're saying that from 1958-1962, China's population decreased by 45 million, yet from 1955-1960, China's population had actually increased by 48 million? Where did you get such a figure?
    1
  24894.  @buckygoldstein9256  "In 1978, Deng Xiaoping was eager to adopt capitalist methods and reforms in order to stimulate economic growth and restore confidence in the party." Correct, but Deng's capitalist reforms also allowed the ills of such a system to infiltrate China, resulting in growing inequality and as well as corruption within the communist party ranks. President Xi Jinping is attempting to reverse those ill effects that capitalism brought to China. You said: "Xi Jinping is a dictator. Look at what he did to Jack Ma. Look at what he did to Chinese stocks:" Capitalism favors monopolies, that's why American monopolies like Amazon, Google, Facebook, Apple, can dominate their respective sectors, eliminating competition from smaller American companies, and stifling innovation through competition in the process. China has an anti-monopoly law to clamp down on anti-competitive practices in Alibaba, Tencent, Didi, and this actually "frees up space" to allow smaller Chinese enterprises to compete. You said: "Deng Xiaoping made China great. Xi Jinping is going to turn China into an ash heap, and maybe the whole world with it." Xi Jinping is reversing the ill effects that Deng's economic reforms brought to China, tackling inequality through a "Common Prosperity" policy. Deng's policies have allowed Eastern Chinese port cities to get rich first, now President Xi is attempting to distribute China's wealth to the poorer Western Regions like Tibet, Xinjiang, etc. The one who's trying to turn the whole world into ash is the United States, by sending Pelosi to visit Taiwan in violation of the One China policy. You said: "If not, how long do you think China will remain the worlds 2nd largest economy with stock performance like that?" Stocks is not the only indicator of an economy.
    1
  24895.  @buckygoldstein9256  "神州 Shenzhou Whatever Chiang Kai-shek did in 1909 to 1911 has no relevance to Taiwan. He did fight the Japanese even if he felt it was more important to fight the communists." Taiwan was occupied by Japan during that period, what makes you think it has no relevance? And when the Japanese invaded Manchuria in 1931, Chiang was reluctant to meet the invaders head on, instead he continued purging communists (our fellow Chinese brethren) until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap Chiang and force him to ally with the communists against the Japanese. This incident is known as the Xi'an Incident (西安事变). Source: Wikipedia: Xi'an Incident Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was thanks to communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release, that he actually survived to form an alliance with the communists against the Japanese. You said: "I told you that Mao said that the Japanese were a disease of the skin but Chiang was a disease of the heart." This is the first time I'm hearing this for you, and are you sure that Mao actually said those words? You said: "The fact that he was a dictator (so was Mao by the way) has nothing to do with whether or not I would understand who the "evil Hiruto" is." I've already answered this in how Chiang served in the Japanese Army from 1909 to 1911. And the Japanese Army is under Emperor Hirohito. You said: "More importantly Chiang being a good guy or a bad guy has nothing to do with Taiwan's status as part of China or a separate nation. Chiang and the KMT were the ones who retained the idea that Taiwan is part of China under the Republic of China's constitution (which Taiwan still abides by) so he is instrumental in the One China policy. You said: "Don't they teach critical thinking in China." There's was study by Stanford University that suggests China is producing students with some of the strongest critical thinking skills in the world.
    1
  24896.  @buckygoldstein9256  "I told you about my Chinese friend Charlie." And I said, this is just an anecdotal evidence, of which we are unable to verify because you did not give his actual name. So who knows, you could have cooked up this story on the spot that's all. Whereas a long-term study by Harvard University and Ash Center has revealed that some 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the Chinese government. A Harvard University survey has found that Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board, with the central authorities receiving the strongest level of approval, increasing from 86 percent to 93 percent between 2003 and 2016, the period of the study. You said: "All I can say about that is where would you rather live, in a democratic US or Communist China?" The U.S is in decline while China is rising. And the U.S is certainly not a democratic country, their leaders are not able to deliver what the ordinary Americans want. Trump and Biden have some of the lowest approval ratings in U.S Presidential history, which is an indication that they aren't carrying out the will of the people. On the other hand, China is actually democratic in the sense that the Chinese government is able to bring prosperity to China through poverty alleviation efforts as well as restore Chinese national pride, then isn't that China's government being able to deliver to the people?
    1
  24897.  @buckygoldstein9256  "神州 Shenzhou You're not wrong about the resolution. But repeating yourself doesn't make you any more right." So you've repeatedly accused me of being wrong about UN General Resolution 2758, yet when I keep an open mind, asking you to point out where have I been wrong in the resolution, you're unable to do so? You said: "However it's a resolution, it's not the law and a resolution doesn't make it either right or absolute." Well, if that's your stance, then Russia should not be bound by the UN's "demand" that they get out of Ukraine then. After all, to you it's just a resolution and not the law. Didn't you quote the saying: "what's good for the goose is good for the gander as well?" You said: "When it was made it was (as you pointed out) considered that China was the ROC." Before 1971, China's seat in the UN Security Council was the ROC yes, but Resolution 2758 was what made the UN recognize PRC as China in the UN Security Council and ROC (i.e Taiwan) was kicked out of the UN. And this process was achieved through democratic voting in the UN. You said: "You told me about maps showing that Taiwan owned all of mainland China. You can argue that the PRC "inherited" that when they took over the ROCs seat in the UN." That's Taiwan's current stance as ROC, and since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan still claims all of mainland China as part of their territory. Since Taiwan can claim the mainland, then can't the mainland also claim Taiwan as part of the PRC? You said: "I would argue that if the communists had killed Chiang Kai-shek before he retreated to Taiwan, resolution 2758 would never have existed. I think it is likely that, in that case, Taiwan would have been either taken over as a protectorate of the US (as being the primary force against Japan) or granted it's independence." We are straying into hypothetical scenarios here, but why would Taiwan island be given to the United States? Chiang retreated to Taiwan in 1949, 2 years after the Japanese surrendered in 1945 at the end of WWII, then why would Taiwan be given to the USA? And if Chiang was killed before retreating to Taiwan, it's possible that the communists would still maintain the claim over Taiwan, since PRC would have inherited ROC's claim over the island.
    1
  24898. Prior to the handover, Hong Kong was under British colonial rule from 1841-1997, and the 1956 HK riots resulted in 59 deaths while the 1967 HK riots resulted in 51 deaths. But after the handover back to mainland China, in today's 2019 HK riot, there have been zero deaths thus far by Hong Kong police, so aren't the HK police showing incredible restraint here?
    1
  24899.  Charles Schmidd  Democracy actually has long history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, even Roman Empire collapsed. Democracy wasn't even popular outside of Greece throughout the ancient world and modern Western democracy only has 100-200 years of history and is not guaranteed to be successful in the future. Throughout 1000-2000 years of history, human society has gravitated towards authoritarian/oligarchic forms of governance, where political power isn't in the hands of the masses, it's concentrated in the hands of the few elites, be it nobles (aristocracy), priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy). Such authoritarian/oligarchic systems were prevalent, because they were simple and because they worked. The elites were oftentimes well-educated and politically experienced enough to make important decisions regarding the country's future, while the ignorant masses were kept far from politics. History is telling you that authoritarian/oligarchic systems worked, they've been the most prevalent forms of government for millenia. Modern Western democracy only has some 100-200 years of history and isn't guaranteed to be successful in the future.
    1
  24900.  @schmidcl77  "Shenzhou. I traveled around China, which I love, but still critizize the system." Which parts of China have you visited?
    1
  24901.  @schmidcl77  So you proclaim to have travelled around China, then why not tell us which provinces and cities you visited? It just sounds suspicious when you avoid answering which part of China that you've been.
    1
  24902. Besides China, North Korea also trades with India, Philippines, Taiwan, France, Russia, Brazil, Mexico, Germany, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, etc. so does USA want to ban trade with all the above countries as well?
    1
  24903.  @ayi3455  You said: "When the Pandemi was first reported by Dr. Li, he was introgated by local authorities due to what he had uploaded in internet to warn the world." Firstly, there was no global pandemic status at the time of Dr Li Wenliang's "report", because no other countries have announced the discovery of a novel coronavirus, apart from China. Secondly, Dr Li didn't want this information to circulate, he wrote on his WeChat that: "Don't circulate the information outside of this group, tell your family and loved ones to take precautions."
    1
  24904.  @gulamog5041  So you're admitting that you're racist, since you're comparing a yellow tone cartoon bear with small eyes to an Asian man?
    1
  24905.  @ayi3455  But there was no "pandemic status" when Dr Li Wenliang was being investigated. And even Dr Li Wenliang himself didn't want to circulate the information, he clearly said "Don't circulate the information outside of this group, tell your family and loved ones to take precautions." (大家不要外传，让家人亲人注意防范) on his WeChat post.
    1
  24906.  @ayi3455  Dr Li Wenliang himself didn't want to circulate the information, he clearly said "Don't circulate the information outside of this group, tell your family and loved ones to take precautions." (大家不要外传，让家人亲人注意防范) on his WeChat post, so why are you claiming that he reported it?
    1
  24907.  @ayi3455  You said that Dr Li Wenliang reported the "Pandemi" (even though there was no pandemic status at that time) yet Dr Li himself didn't want to circulate the information, he clearly said "Don't circulate the information outside of this group, tell your family and loved ones to take precautions." (大家不要外传，让家人亲人注意防范) on his WeChat post, so why are you claiming that he reported it?
    1
  24908.  @ayi3455  So your governor of Jakarta decided to use the proper name COVID019 in accordance with World Health Organization naming conventions, then what seems to be the problem when China wants to use the proper name as well? What's your problem? You've shown that the Jakarta governor use the proper official name for the coronavirus, yet you complain about China "not accepting the proper name" for the coronavirus?
    1
  24909.  @ayi3455  Earlier you said that Dr Li Wenliang reported the "Pandemi" (even though there was no pandemic status at that time, the WHO only declared pandemic status on 20th March 2020) yet Dr Li himself didn't want to circulate the information, he clearly said "Don't circulate the information outside of this group, tell your family and loved ones to take precautions." (大家不要外传，让家人亲人注意防范) on his WeChat post, so why are you claiming that he reported it?
    1
  24910.  @ayi3455  Since you believe that Fort Detrick isn't the origin of the coronavirus, then why not the USA allow the WHO team to investigate Fort Detrick to clear up the US's name and put an end to the rumours once and for all? China had allowed WHO team to visit Wuhan and their findings indicate that Covid-19 entered Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market externally, and they've all but dismissed the possibility of a lab leak as highly unlikely. Why not USA allow WHO team to visit Fort Detrick and dispel those rumours? Unless they have something to hide.
    1
  24911.  @ayi3455  Why should the World Health Organization use the improper name for Covid-19? You yourself said that Jakarta governor used the proper name Covid-19 after it has been formalised by the WHO, yet you're continuing to use the improper name?
    1
  24912.  @ayi3455  You said: "神州 Shenzhou Americans are racists..." Then why are you attempting to propagate this racism by continually using the improper name for the coronavirus? You are propagating hate towards Asians by using the improper name for Covid-19 that's all.
    1
  24913.  @ayi3455  Earlier you said: "When the Pandemi was first reported by Dr. Li, he was introgated by local authorities due to what he had uploaded in internet to warn the world." But there was no pandemic status at that time, the WHO only declared pandemic status on 20th March 2020. Furthermore, Dr Li himself said in his WeChat that "Don't circulate the information outside of this group, tell your family and loved ones to take precautions." (大家不要外传，让家人亲人注意防范), so why are you claiming that he reported it?
    1
  24914.  @ayi3455  Explain why were there traces of Covid-19 found in Barcelona sewers in Spain, even before the outbreak in Wuhan even began? Spanish virologists have found traces of the novel coronavirus in a sample of Barcelona waste water collected in March 2019, nine months before the COVID-19 disease was identified in China, the University of Barcelona. Furthermore, the WHO team visited Wuhan and their findings indicate that the coronavirus entered Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market externally, and they've all but dismissed the possibility of a lab leak as highly improbable. If Fort Detrick was really not related, then why not USA open up Fort Detrick for investigation in order to dispel rumours and clear the USA? Unless they have something to hide.
    1
  24915.  @ayi3455  The World Health Organization investigated Wuhan and their findings were indeterminate, then why not open the WHO investigation to other leads, like Fort Detrick or Barcelona sewers in Spain? If they were not the origin, then a WHO investigation would help clear their name and dispel rumors, yet China is the only country to have undergone a WHO coronavirus origins investigation. And now you're claiming that you lied about Dr. Li reporting the "Pandemi" (even though there was no pandemic status by WHO at that time?) Why'd you lied about Dr Li reporting it when it's apparent that he didn't want to circulate that information? China had informed the WHO of mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019 anyway, so what does bringing up Dr Li achieve?
    1
  24916. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24917. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  24918. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24919. 觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24920. Even the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24921. Countries all over the world recognize that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  24922. Unlike Japan and SK, NK is nuclear nation and should be taken seriously.
    1
  24923. China is the 3rd country in the world to demonstrate anti-satellite capabilities, taking out a 750 kg satellite in orbit at an altitude of 865 km, with a missile launched from the ground. If PLA army takes out Indian army satellites in space, then how the India troops and armor be able to function properly on the ground without satellite support?
    1
  24924. Arun Nair Prior to 1962, Zhou Enlai visited New Delhi to negotiate our border dispute and proposed the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence 和平共处五项原则 to help define China-India relations. But PM Nehru refused to sit down to negotiation, and instead pursued an aggressive 'Forward' policy of building military bases at our disputed border, sometimes even going past the international line and into actual Chinese territory. So how can you claim China launched a sneak attack, when India is building military bases at our disputed border here?
    1
  24925. Ryanator Changerang You expect the mainland to give up half of China to Taiwan? In truth, KMT lost the Chinese Civil War so what gives them the right to demand territory that they lost to China? I mean, its just like an hypothetical American Civil War and when one side loses to the other, yet the loser of the war still wants to claim territory from the winner? What logic is this? If Hong Kong is going to s**t then its because of HK's own system. The people of HK have 50% say in the government, the other 50% is from an Election committee comprised of major HK corporations. Look at Macau and its co-existing under the One Country, Two Systems policy, so why do you claim it will never work? Look at the prosperous Shanghai in the mainland, and it has long overtaken HK as a major port city.and financial hub. Its because the mainland government makes plans for Shanghai's future and implement them, but what do HK's leaders do for HK?
    1
  24926. +Ryanator Changerang "Hong Kong's government was a fair and true democracy until Beijing began sending in their own agents to ruin it and take control." Which agents from Beijing have "ruined" HK? In the end, Hong Kong elections are still held by people of HK so how exactly did China "ruin it and take control"? "Taiwan is Chinese territory" Exactly! China has always maintained that Taiwan is Chinese territory so we are in agreement regarding that statement and China firmly opposes the independence of Taiwan (as mentioned many times in public statements) "Hong Kong, Macau, and Taipei flourished under British, Portuguese, and Nationalist Chinese rule" But the fact remains that cities in the mainland (like Shanghai, Beijing, etc) have long surpassed those states. Today, China is the world's 2nd largest economy and Taipei is no longer the economic power that it used to be. Its because HK, Macau and Taipei's systems don't work. Here is a short 2 minute clip about the night view of 11 Chinese cities Source: Beautiful Night View of China 2016 youtube.com/watch?v=G7ZRa-w9xyA Otherwise, why is Chinese cities so much more powerful than those cities? Can you explain why?
    1
  24927. +Nagalakshmi Saladi US President Donald Trump just unilaterally slap tariff on steel and aluminum imports, without even going through the proper WTO channels. USA has excluded some countries from the tariffs, but India is not one of those lucky countries. Even Japan was not excluded from the tariffs.
    1
  24928. My point was that India is also on the steel and aluminum tariff list set by US president Trump so why are you talking about China? Why suddenly talk about South China Sea claims? China first claimed the SCS islands back in 1947 (2 years after WW2) when Republic of China drew the 11 dash line, and that was long before China became powerful like we are today. As for Doklam, China did not raise any issue initially, it was Indian troops that choose to obstruct PLA road construction, even when India does not claim Doklam as part of its own territory. As for whether it failed, PLA troops are still patrolling the region, whereas Indian MEA already reported that India's withdrawal from Doklam is almost complete. As for CPEC, why you claim it has failed? CPEC is still ongoing so how can you just declare it a failure? Can Indian troops actually do anything to stop PLA road construction in Kashmir? And when USA raised tariffs, it also meant India is affected by the steel and aluminum tariffs so how is it a good thing for India? Trump's tariff could be one of the reason why Modi decide to promote better economic relations with China here.
    1
  24929. How did you even get a 80 : 20 ratio in the first place? If other countries are given such an unfair ratio, then why they continue doing business with China then? Can you tell how you get this figure? Otherwise aren't you just being biased against China here? Also, what has SCS and Doklam even got to do with China's economic trade with other countries? India does not claim SCS or Doklam as part of its territory, so what has it got to do with India then?
    1
  24930. 0x0cd0 You make decisions based on what Indians consider right or wrong? What sort of supremacist logic is that? SCS dispute is between China and South East Asian countries to resolve ourselves, and Doklam is between China and Bhutan to resolve ourselves, so why do Indians butt into this disputes? Because of their own supremacist sense of what's right and wrong? Who are you to decide what's right and wrong according to India?
    1
  24931. According to the following source from The Diplomat, there are 66 countries that supported China's stance (marked in RED ) in South China Sea dispute, compared to only about 5-8 countries that supported Philippines stance (marked in BLUE ) So who is ignoring the world opinion here? Source:Map of who supports China in SCS and why thediplomat.com/2016/07/who-supports-china-in-the-south-china-sea-and-why/
    1
  24932. 0x0cd0 What world tribunal? That was the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which not even an official UN agency, like International Court of Justice, so China reserves the right not to follow its jurisdiction.
    1
  24933. 0x0cd0 What sort of "good" advice have you given at all? All you claim is that China is always wrong and that whatever India does is always right, and you don't even provide evidence of your own, just dismissing my claims that 66 countries supported China's stance over Philippines' in that map (including India) Even now, China welcomes India to come on board the Belt and Road Initiative to share the mutual progress and prosperity, but even if New Delhi declines this offer, in the end, Beijing will still respect its decision.
    1
  24934. +Alex Johnson If you are not Indian or Chinese national, then what do you know of India-China Relations?
    1
  24935. +Ryan Lajara Why is USA automatically assumed to be the lesser evil? China has been peaceful for 30 years since our last major war in 1979. But the USA is been involved in wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, etc, even in 21st century. China wants to make Asia strong, by building infrastructure in Pakistan (CPEC), Kazarhstan, other -stan countries, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, as well as African countries, like Nigeria, Angola, Ethiopia, etc. But USA wants to provoke a war with North Korea by sending aircraft carrier strike groups and warships across Pacific Ocean, while still bombing Middle East Countries.
    1
  24936. Why do you think every country was better before communism? Before the 1917, Russia was arguably the poorest country in Europe and technologically backward compared Western Europe and USA, but after the 1917 Communist Revolution, the new Soviet Union rapidly grew to become arguably the strongest country in Europe both militarily and economically.
    1
  24937. When China eventually surpasses the United States as the world's largest economy some day in the future, we might see a trend where Westerners start adopting Chinese names in order to do business in China.
    1
  24938.  @RubiAkito  宝龙红色? 你是中国人吗？
    1
  24939. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24940. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  24941. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  24942.  @wolfwanker6196  Is hurling personal insults against others, just because our views differ from yours, the only way you know how to communicate? Why don't you attempt to refute my points instead of attacking me personally?
    1
  24943.  @adoreslaurel  Hong Kong clearly have their own government separate from the mainland. China is the only country in the world that allows two political systems (communism and democracy) to exist within our borders. Hong Kong recently held an election in 2019.
    1
  24944.  @adoreslaurel  China has One country, Two systems (communism and democracy), but every other Western country in the world is One Country, One System, so China is unique in this regard
    1
  24945.  @adoreslaurel  If you want to talk about prison populations then it's actually America that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back on to the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate
    1
  24946.  @adoreslaurel  What makes you think Chinese people can't travel freely? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, haven't you heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies? Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationthailand.com/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  24947.  shafiq beig  I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  24948.  @patrikpass2962  About organ harvesting, under old Chinese laws, it was legal to harvest organs from prisoners on death row, but only with the express permission from the criminals or their family members. In my opinion, the prisoner is already sentenced to death, so at least the organs will be put to good use saving lives, instead of being wasted and buried together with the body. However, since 2014, China has abolished the practice of harvesting organs from executed prisoners, and China's organ transplant rate are low and organ waiting lists are long. Source: The Economist: China ends the practice of harvesting organs from executed prisoners economist.com/graphic-detail/2014/12/30/organ-harvest
    1
  24949.  @patrikpass2962  Falun Dafa was founded on 1992 by a man called Li Hongzhi, by hijacking existing practices from Taoism, Buddhism and traditional Chinese qigong practices. This should already sound off alarm bells that it's actually a cult in disguise of religion. The Falun Gong followers believe that their leader Li is almighty, able to cure any disease and none are allowed to question his purported supernatural powers. There have been cases of followers who were early stage cancer patients who refused to seek medical treatment, instead they were encouraged to donate their savings to Li in hopes of him curing their cancer. The cancer patients died in the end. China has long abolished the act of harvesting organs from executed prisoners in 2014 (as I shown above) yet Falun Gong continues to pour out anti-China propaganda through media such as China Uncensored or The Epoch Times.
    1
  24950.  @petersinclair3997  Threatening Taiwan? The U.S House of Representatives Speaker had visited the island in violation of the One China policy that''s why mainland China held military exercises in order to defend China's sovereignty. Even Taiwan's constitution states that the island is part of China.
    1
  24951.  Molly Wop Chainsaw  America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set and many economists firmly believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's sometime in the foreseeable future. If China can someday surpass the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this eventual goal of ours? Nobody said USA has to be number 1 all the time, why can't Americans accept the notion that they may not be number one anymore in the future?
    1
  24952.  The Hate Factory  Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors (just ask the expats here) whereas many Westerners are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands with suspicion.
    1
  24953.  Molly Wop Chainsaw  Biden administration just recently promised an end to the decades long Afghan War and planning pull out US soldiers from Afghanistan, why would they want to enter another war with mainland China, over Taiwan? Otherwise, you're saying China should just allow a tyrant USA to remain in power definitely, and not do anything about it? Furthermore, China backing off, doesn't necessarily mean that USA will back off. For example, USA continually treats Russia with suspicion even after the Soviet Union collapse in 1990s, this means that even if China backs off, doesn't mean that USA won't continue antagonising China afterwards. The best solution would be for China to rise, so that USA has no choice but to regard China as an equal. Otherwise, USA will continue stepping all over China and keeping us under their foot.
    1
  24954.  Molly Wop Chainsaw  The American soldiers deployed to Afghanistan, suffered for decades in a pointless war in the Middle East, would they even want to be deployed to the US military bases surrounding China, in Japan and South Korea, a potential location for the eruption of the next World War? Would American soldiers happily reunited with their families in USA, want to separate again to be deployed halfway across the globe to Asia? The USA relies on foreign policy in order to avoid dealing with domestic problems at home and to demonstrate their commitments to their allies. The previous Trump administration has seriously alienated US allies, so Biden administration needs to drum up anti-China support from their allies once again. China's strategy is to woo US allies and expand business with them, so it becomes increasingly difficult for US allies to want to declare war on China. That's why USA is resorting to sanctions and threatening allies to do the same. Remember, even if China does nothing, it doesn't mean USA will do nothing. USA is now aware of China as a potential threat to its hegemony, they won't go back to sleep after waking up. Unless one day USA suddenly elected a sleepy President who decides to ignore China. The same way, the sleeping giant China will not go back to sleep now that we are awake, we need to progress otherwise we risk being left behind again, as during the 19th century. In any case, doing something is better than doing nothing. If China does nothing, then obviously nothing will change, China will forever be under the heel of Westerners, unless we start making them see us as equals.
    1
  24955.  Molly Wop Chainsaw  A million and a half soldiers? The Chinese People's Liberation Army is world's largest land army home to estimated 2 million active personnel with another half million personnel in reserve. And war veterans during Vietnam War, Korean War, and now the Middle Eastern wars are tired of waging wars so far away from American soil, American soldiers should be fighting to defend their lands, rather than dying in wars halfway across the globe. I thought Americans have freedom of speech, freedom to vote, that the American people determine the US government, so shouldn't it be Americans themselves who have the power to stop their country from going to war? Studies have shown that America spent some 6 trillion dollars ($6,000,000,000,000) on seemingly pointless wars in the Middle East. Source: America has spent $6.4 trillion on wars in the Middle East and Asia since 2001, a new study says cnbc.com/2019/11/20/us-spent-6point4-trillion-on-middle-east-wars-since-2001-study.html And like I said, it's not as though if China leave USA alone, that USA will leave China alone. Just as USA continues to treat Russia with suspicion even after the USSR collapse, the USA will not go back to sleep after waking up to sunrise that is China. Likewise, China will not go back to sleep after waking up, we need to continue our progress lest we fall behind in development. Furthermore, China has become the world's factory and a prominent driver of global economy, China was the only major country to see positive economic growth in 2020 and we recently released our 1st Quarter GDP growth of whopping 18%. China is actually driving global economy growth post-Covid, where the USA can't be relied upon to drive the global economy post-Covid, given that they are yet to get their home affairs in order. Remember, if China does nothing, then obviously nothing will change, and China will continue to be under the US heel. Only by doing something, that we can avert this collision course and get USA to see us as equals.
    1
  24956. The pro-independence Taiwan president Tsai has resigned after suffering major setback in the Taiwan midterm elections, so doesn't it imply that majority of the people of Taiwan don't want independence? Since they voted against Tsai?
    1
  24957.  @Nautilus1972  I'm talking about a Central Bank Digital Currency that is China's digital Renminbi, not cryptocurrencies that are not issued by a central bank.
    1
  24958. In China, the Chinese government controls the corporations for China's benefit, reining in companies that strayed too far. In the U.S, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    1
  24959. In China, the Chinese government controls the corporations for China's benefit, reining in companies that strayed too far. In the U.S, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for their own personal gain and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    1
  24960. In China, the Chinese government controls the corporations for China's benefit, reining in companies that strayed too far. In the U.S, the U.S corporations control the U.S government for their own personal gain and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    1
  24961. In China, the government controls the corporations for China's benefit, reining in companies that strayed too far. In the U.S, the corporations control the government for their own personal gain and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    1
  24962. In China, the government control the corporations for the country's benefit. In the U.S, the corporations control the government for their own personal gain.
    1
  24963. Socialist countries like Venezuela and Libya nationalize the oil reserves so that the ordinary people can receive income from oil proceeds, but such countries have become the target of U.S sanctions.
    1
  24964.  LOSER trump 7  Yes, the USA holding and stealing Russia's and Afghanistan's money makes them a criminal.
    1
  24965.  @MrK-js3it  Digital Renminbi will grant the state greater control than the current system, which would help catch financial criminals like money launderers or bribery, but as for being weaponized like SWIFT, there is insufficient data to conclude that it could be another form of control overseas.
    1
  24966.  @Deco_2k  Look at what Australia was demanding from China, that led up to China's response.
    1
  24967.  @peorakef  Why did ROC 🇹🇼 even lose the mainland to PRC 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa? Back then, nobody expected the communists to succeed yet look at where we are today. During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage; they were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were lousy, and they had far fewer numbers (only 50 communist members in 1921) over the Kuomintang. The KMT on the other hand, had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training, and far superior numbers over the the communists. Securing victory against the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT. Yet the communists survived all KMT attempts to wipe them out, employing strategies like "Long March" (长征) and despite KMT's initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan). This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland.
    1
  24968.  @peorakef  About the Social Credit System, many foreigners often complain Chinese people spit in public, smoke in non-smoking areas, jump queues, disobey traffic rules, jay walk, drive on wrong side of the road, speed through red lights, etc when not all Chinese people are like that. We Chinese feel embarrassed that such bad people represent China overseas, so the government introduce social credit system to discourage such bad behaviour and promote better behaviour instead. This is a meritocratic system where good behaviour is rewarded and bad behaviour penalised. But if such people persist with bad behaviour, until their scores fall to become unacceptable, then they will be barred from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisances of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again.
    1
  24969.  @peorakef  Taiwan's Navy has reported that 27 sailors tested positive for Covid-19, after their ship travelled to the island nation of Palau. A total of 27 sailors are confirmed to have been infected so far. They were on a friendship visit by three Taiwanese navy ships to the Pacific island state of Palau, one of only 15 nations that have formal diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Source: Taiwan defence minister apologises after coronavirus outbreak on navy ship channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/taiwan-defence-minister-apologises-covid-19-coronavirus-navy-12664304 The thing is that Palau has no confirmed cases and it's government said there was no cause to panic about the Taiwan navy cases as there was "little chance that the virus on the vessels came from Palau". So does it imply that Taiwan sailors had the virus and was covering it up? Or maybe Palau government is lying? Either way, it's possibly going to damage the their relations.
    1
  24970.  @peorakef  "神州 Shenzhou unfortunately everyone has heard of all Chinese mainlander tourists" That's precisely why the Social Credit System is needed to discourage such bad public behaviour like you mentioned of mainlanders and to reward them for socially acceptable behaviour. But if such people continue to persist with bad behaviour until their scores fall to become unacceptable levels, then they will be banned from purchasing plane tickets to fly out of China and make nuisance of themselves overseas. At least until their scores improve until it becomes acceptable for them to travel again. That's part of meritocracy after all, where good behaviour gets rewarded and bad behaviour gets penalised. I'm using logic to argue my points, but you just mock mainlanders and respond with unrelated rhymes like "1+1 = 2, Roses are red, violets are blue" and so on.
    1
  24971.  @peorakef  Yes, I did said "taiwan is part of china" (that's my statement) but did I ever said that you of deny that? If you don't deny that Taiwan is part of China (as written under their own constitution) then why you suddenly explode against me and mocking me for my views? How does using "1+1=2, Roses are red, violets are blue" even make your point clearer to me? You're clearly mocking me, throughout this whole discussion you adopt a condescending view on me for my views, whereas I use logic and cite sources to supplement my arguments.
    1
  24972.  @peorakef  Because you seem to hold liberal democracy as the best form of government, even though Taiwan has been historically under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, jailing and killing political dissidents. Yet Taiwan actually flourished under authoritarian single-party KMT, so why suddenly adopt liberal democracy when authoritarian rule actually suited Taiwan more? Even when KMT ruled the mainland (1912-1949) there was hardly any democracy in ROC, they only held 2 elections (One on 1913, One on 1948) throughout ROC rule in the mainland.
    1
  24973.  @peorakef  KMT came to power by overthrowing the previous Qing Dynasty China and establishing Republic of China recognising itself as government. So when CPC did the same and came to power in the mainland by overthrowing KMT and establishing People's Republic of China and recognising itself as government, then what's the difference between KMT and CPC? Why do you seemingly apply biased double standards between KMT and CPC, with regards to rulership over the mainland? All you do is mock me constantly for my views, just because my views happen to differ from yours. Throughout this whole discussion you adopt a condescending tone to whatever source of information I bring up, and use nonsensical rhymes like "1+1=2, Roses are red, violets are blue" and expect your point to be clear to me. You're clearly poking fun at me with your words. Yes, I said "taiwan is part of china" those are my words, but did I ever said that you deny Taiwan is part of China?
    1
  24974.  @peorakef  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  24975.  @peorakef  "Actually since you indirectly blamed Xi here" When did I ever said anything about President Xi Jinping?
    1
  24976.  @peorakef  According to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china
    1
  24977.  @peorakef  Look at mainland China and China has since transformed from a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in past to world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, its manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ("Made in Taiwan" used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by" Made in China") Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to retake the mainland and relies on US for weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    1
  24978.  @peorakef  What condescending tone of mine? Look at you saying "1+1=2, Roses are red, violets are blue" and constantly mocking me for my views, even though I use logic and cite articles to support my arguments. You're just deliberately being anti-China that's all, you apply double standards between ROC and PRC and you can't even explain why ROC lost the mainland to PRC and had to flee to Formosa.
    1
  24979.  @peorakef  For an example of the mainland's economic success, look at high speed rail and mainland China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail and the high speed rail in Taiwan in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours. China has possibly more high speed rail track than even the rest of the world combined. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    1
  24980.  @peorakef  About Education in China, being the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4 times that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  24981.  @peorakef  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA. The test is given every three years to 15-year-olds around the world and measures their knowledge in reading, science and mathematics. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html The best-performing students in all three subjects were in China. They attend schools in and around Beijing and Shanghai, and two provinces: Jiangsu and Zhejiang. Even Singapore has lost its top spots in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) rankings, thanks to China’s astronomical rise for all three subjects measured. Source: Singapore students lose PISA top spot to China – which wasn’t in top 5 previously – despite far above global average scores businessinsider.com/singapore-students-lose-pisa-top-spot-to-china-which-wasnt-in-top-5-previously-despite-far-above-global-average-scores/
    1
  24982.  @peorakef  Emotionally? How? Did I type in capital letters or mock you? All I did was ask for Taiwan's formal declaration of independence and who signed it and when was it signed. Since Taiwan clearly does not have a declaration of independence, then by default Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. How's this emotional, when all you done is mock me for asking logical questions?
    1
  24983.  @peorakef  Growths rates under President Xi slowed because of the trade war, when President Trump unilaterally slapping tariffs on steel and aluminium, without going through the proper World Trade Organisation channels. How's that make Xi a bad ruler when I didn't even mention his name? You're the one who brought up Xi and somehow claimed that I'm indirectly blaming him.
    1
  24984.  @peorakef  You posted unrelated comments like DPRK claiming they are democratic and also 南宋, yet why can't I bring up China's achievements? Why do you apply double standards between topics you can bring up and topics I bring up relating to China?
    1
  24985.  @peorakef  You're clearly anti-China, you said all Chinese mainland tourist who s**t on the street and try to sleep in the hotel lobbies for free, so why pretend that you aren't anti-China? You care absolutely nothing for China's interests nor do you wish to see China succeed that's all, and you resort to mocking me for my views, just because my views happen to differ from yours. Please stop pretending that you actually care about Chinese people, when you clearly don't.
    1
  24986.  @peorakef  Taiwan under democracy is suffering, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are unable to find jobs, so some of them seek employment opportunities abroad in the mainland and places like Singapore. Video: How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents youtu.be/P3BCnPb8qHY?t=110 "From 90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreementa on policy matters. This produces less effective policy making. Secondly the ruling parties tend to be more conservative in Taiwan, so they don't enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou, Research fellow, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica
    1
  24987.  @peorakef  About Education in China, the government is pouring funds into R&D, and China already has world's highest R&D spending according to the following source: Countries by Research and Development spending 1. China ($553.4 billion) 2. United States ($511.1 billion) 3. European Union ($379.0 billion) 4. Japan ($165.7 billion) 5. Germany ($118.8 billion) 6. South Korea ($91.6 billion) 7. India ($66.5 billion) 8. France ($60.0 billion) 9. United Kingdom ($44.8 billion) 10. Russia ($42.6 billion) ... Source: List of countries by research and development spending wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending#List In the West, researchers often have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    1
  24988.  @peorakef  What's wrong with Taiwan having their own constitution different from the mainland? Hong Kong has their own constitution (Basic Law) which is different from mainland China, yet Hong Kong is part of China under the One Country, Two Systems Policy. So Taiwan is recognised as part of China under the One China Policy under their own constitution.
    1
  24989.  @peorakef  Once again, I explained how China's economic growth under President Xi slowed because of President Trump's Trade War, yet you still claim I blame Xi Jinping? I didn't even mention Xi, you're the one who brought up Xi and somehow claimed that I'm indirectly blaming him.
    1
  24990.  @peorakef  Hey, why did you edit your comment? You clearly said "all Chinese mainland tourist", so why did you edited your comment to remove the "all"? Why you employ such dirty trick of editing your comment and then claiming you didn't say "all"?
    1
  24991.  @peorakef  Your comment on "all mainland Chinese tourists" has been edited so you could have sneakily removed the "all" and then claim that you didn't say "all" so resort to dirty trick like editing your comment and then claiming you never said such a thing. You are clearly anti-China, you mock Chinese tourists, mock our Social Credit System, mock Chinese government, mock me as indirectly blaming Xi for slowing economic growth (when I already explained that it's the US-China Trade War that slowed the economy) So why pretend to be on the same side when you care absolutely nothing for China's interests nor do you wish to see China succeed that's all?
    1
  24992.  @peorakef  You say Taiwan flourishes now much more, then where are the famous companies from Taiwan? Take smartphones for example, and mainland China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power as the mainland?
    1
  24993.  @peorakef  Check out Huawei P30 Pro zooming not just 10x or 20x or 30x but a whopping 50x zoom. From a high-rise building you can zoom in on a chess game on ground level. Video: Huawei P30 Pro ZOOM 50X Feature youtu.be/SeSzNxb1Eyw But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan hope to match the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  24994.  @peorakef  You clearly said "all Chinese mainland tourist" now you edited your comment and accuse me of being a liar? How am I going to prove myself when you deliberately edited your comment to remove the "all"? You're just anti-China that's all, so why pretend you're not? You care absolutely nothing for China's interests nor do you wish to see China succeed that's all. Why don't you name me some of Taiwan's famous companies as opposed to the mainland? Look at Huawei's P30 Pro zoom on the beautiful full Moon with no accessories. Video: Moon zoom shot on the Huawei P30 Pro with no accessories youtu.be/YayhC2f76q8 But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  24995.  @peorakef  Why do you resort to hurling personal insults (like 汉奸) against me for my views? Earlier you started mocking me by saying "1 + 1 = 2. Roses are red, violets are blue" so why are you deliberately mocking me for my views? About Education in China, As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  24996.  @peorakef  Your comment has clearly been edited to remove the "all" so why are you accusing me of being a liar, when you erased the evidence of your crime? And where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? Besides Huawei, even Xiaomi has broken out of China and become the number one smartphone brand in India. Xiaomi was started in 2010. Today it's one of the most popular smartphones in the world. In India, it's number one. Video: How Xiaomi broke out of China to go global youtu.be/291DlKa7iIU But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan even hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  24997.  @peorakef  About Education in China, China publishes more research papers than any other country in the world, over a wide range of topics such as physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences. Countries by published scientific papers in 2016: 1. China (426,165 articles) 2. United States (408,985 articles) 3. India (110,320 articles) 4. Germany (103,122 articles) 5. United Kingdom (97,527 articles) 6. Japan (96,536 articles) 7. France (69,431 articles) 8. Italy (69,125 articles) 9. South Korea (63,063 articles) 10. Russia (59,134 articles) ... Source: List of countries by number of scientific and technical journal articles wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_scientific_and_technical_journal_articles This shows that many Chinese scientist and researchers are making discoveries and publishing their findings, contributing to mankind's scientific advancements.
    1
  24998.  @peorakef  You clearly edited your comment to remove the "all" and then accuse me of being a liar. You mocked me at every turn (like your nonsensical comment "1+1=2. Roses are red..") so what makes you think you are open to reasonable discussion? You edited your comment to erase evidence and then accuse me of being dirty liar. About poverty in China, according to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015, growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  24999.  @peorakef  Besides Chinese smartphone companies like Huawei and Xiaomi China also produced successful Internet companies like Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, Suning.com, Bytedance (Tik tok), Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, Trip.com, 58.com, Sina Corp, Sohu, and so on Source: List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies#List But where are all the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan even hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  25000.  @peorakef  About Science in China, Chinese universities produce the most STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) out of any other country in the world. Countries With The Most STEM Graduates 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/02/02/the-countries-with-the-most-stem-graduates-infographic/ This implies that China is going to play a much larger role in the STEM fields, given the sheer number of graduates produced in these fields.
    1
  25001. The Chinese government is willing to sacrifice China's economy (a painful decision) and halt production, closing tourist attractions, imposing lockdown, banning mass gatherings, all in a bid to prioritise people's lives and contain the virus. Now it's finally paying off that the virus is under control in China and we are cautiously reopening our economy. But in Western countries like US and UK, their economies are far too precious to sacrifice so human health has to be sacrificed instead. Donald Trump wants to reopen the economy by Easter and Boris Johnson is relying on "herd immunity" to the pull through. So human lives have to be sacrificed instead of the economy.
    1
  25002. And Biden's son was accepted into the U.S Navy Reserve at the age of 43. What's the significance of that?
    1
  25003. Hunter Biden joined the US Navy reserve at the age of 43. What does this all mean?
    1
  25004.  @soegiartonugroho  But you said (and I quote your words) that: "As long as you obey their law when you are there, you're safe." even when George Floyd wasn't resisting, yet he was killed?
    1
  25005.  @soegiartonugroho  So the punishment for allegedly using fake money is death for George Floyd? No court hearing or lawyer for Floyd? What happened to the American rule of law?
    1
  25006.  @soegiartonugroho  What about African American Ahmaud Arbery, who was tragicay shot by policemen, just for jogging? He did not break any law, yet he's dead.
    1
  25007.  @soegiartonugroho  So I have proven your statement: "As long as you obey their law when you are there, you're safe." wrong.
    1
  25008.  @soegiartonugroho  USA also accuse China of potentially abusing the Hong Kong Extradition Bill (now scrapped) yet USA turn around and abuse their own extradition bill with Canada through Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou extradition case. The sheer irony of USA accusing China of potentially doing what they themselves are doing.
    1
  25009. Given the enormous sanctions the West levied at Russia recently, China should do well to prepare for sanctions being thrown our way.
    1
  25010. Many Filipinos tend to have the "colonial mentality". Such people tend to view their own culture, language and values as 'backward' and try to adhere to the culture, language and values of their colonial master. The mentally colonised do not adapt ideas to their own reality, instead they try to live in other people's reality (namely in that of their former master's). It's like Stockholm Syndrome. Even if the physical shackles of colonization are broken, the mental shackles of colonization remain firm in many Filipino's minds.
    1
  25011. Putin probably realized that unless Russia tackled the root problem; Ukraine supporting ultra-nationalist, neo-nazis like the Azov Battallion, then there will be no peace in Donbas region, and NATO will just continue ignoring Russia wanting assurances that NATO will not expand eastward (i.e that Ukraine not be allowed to join NATO).
    1
  25012. Singapore is the only South East Asian country to have slapped sanctions on Russia, thus earning Singapore a place on Russia's list of "unfriendly nations."
    1
  25013. Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous affair with a much older man has been exposed, and she's expressed a desire for personal privacy in a videocall with IOC. But the WTA would have none of that, and they are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see, instead of respecting her wish for privacy.
    1
  25014. Animal testing using mice and chimpanzees has been ongoing in laboratories all over the world, that produced results that enable humans to consume drugs safely, so why fault China only for an experimental breakthrough in science?
    1
  25015. Philippines had deliberately ran a ground a vessel (BRP Sierra Madre) on to the Chinese territory of the Second Thomas Shoal, in order to claim it.
    1
  25016.  @paradoxine6287  If you don't like Wikipedia, then ResearchGate also has an article entitled: The Treaty Limits of the Philippines where Philippines maritime boundaries are clearly marked out in the Treaty of Paris and the South China Sea is not included within Philippine territory.
    1
  25017.  @jeremywolfe6929  So if Mongolia didn't relinquish their control, then why isn't Mongolia trying to claim China now? As for Tibet, it is currently recognized today as part of the People's Republic of China.
    1
  25018. +Feather Butt You claim Trump has increased the economy then what happens when Trump steps down at the end of his term? What if the next US president starts reversing Trump's policies?
    1
  25019. +Bruce Leroy Congratulations to America for finally surpassing China with its supercomputer, just this year in June 2018 . I am not unreasonable if USA has beaten China in certain areas. However, in the Top500 supercomputer list, China now has 206 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers as compared to USA's 124 out of 500 as of June 2018. China is also rapidly developing in other areas of science. For example, China published more research papers than the USA. China is also fast becoming a world leader in Artificial Intelligence. China Is Leading in Artificial Intelligence and American Businesses Should Take Note Source: inc.com/magazine/201809/amy-webb/china-artificial-intelligence.html
    1
  25020. I'm not talking about Obama, and Feather Butt was clearly talking about Trump not Obama. Like I said, what happens when Trump finally steps down and someone else takes over? What if the next US president begins reversing Trumps "reforms"? Then America will go back to square one.
    1
  25021. "Every Chinese knows that the 8 political parties you mentioned are paid as well as the communist party." The question from Jon Z was "神州 Shenzhou do they have any other parties other than communism in China???? Just curious" and I simply answered his questions that's all.
    1
  25022. "They would have to go through different legislations to repeal trump's actions in office," Didn't President Trump wanted to repeal Obamacare as well? Didn't Trump wanted to take America out of Obama's Trans Pacific Partnership deal? Your next US president could just as easily start reversing Trump's policies made today, and all your efforts would be wasted. I mean, its your US system and you spend money planning for Obamacare and TPP, and then you cancel those plans then all those money just go down the drain.
    1
  25023. +Bruce Leroy That's the major problem of your US government system. You have multiple parties all opposing one another, and nobody wants to tackle the huge US problems, like healthcare, debt, gun violence and so on. In USA, the gun laws are so loose, that ordinary people can have access to firearms, and this makes it easier to commit crimes like robbery as well as those tragic school shootings by armed gunmen. Sometimes, some trigger happy Caucasian cops just shoot the African American suspect first and then ask questions later (because of the possibility of the suspect being armed) But Americans themselves don't want to amend their gun laws, because they refuse to surrender their rights to bear firearms. Whereas in China, we can just ban civilian use of firearms. We have a single-party government and that single-party is largely focused on making China a better place and promoting China's interest. But is US multi-party government even promoting US interests? Or their own interests?
    1
  25024. +Bruce Leroy You insult all those US political parties you mentioned, then what's the whole point of having multiple parties in US politics? Each party pulls USA in a separate direction and each party always blame one another for America's problems. I mean, look at the way you insult each party. If everyone blames everyone else, then who's going to take responsibility for America? Whereas in China, there is only a single party, the CCP, so all the good things and all the bad things are all credited and blamed on CCP. The CCP have done both good and bad things since ruling China and because of that, they accept responsibility and make changes accordingly. For example, China was failing under Mao's communist market system, so Deng Xiaoping opened China's markets in 1970s, and thus, China progressed rapidly. Another example is One-Child Policy, and now since China's birth rate is shrinking, the policy has been changed to Two-Child Policy. China has pollution problems, so the government is planning to ban coal powerplants (because they burn dirtily and pollute the air) and is planning to ban non-electric cars in China by 2040.In fact, China sold more electric vehicles in 2017 than USA and Europe, and China has the largest stock of electric buses in the world. China is leading the world in Plug In Electric Vehicle (PEV) sales Source: Electric car use by country wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_car_use_by_country The CCP is an efficient government that actually gets work done, instead of arguing among themselves in a multi-party system like the USA. Since China is successful, then why should China adopt multi-party system then?
    1
  25025. Bruce Leroy About Jill Stein's Green New Deal, to move away from fossil fuels to 100% clean energy by 2030. The big US oil companies like Exxon-Mobil aren't going to be too happy about that. Their petroleum workers will lose their jobs, and all the petroleum infrastructure (like gas stations) will have to be replaced by electric charging terminals instead. Not to mention the big oil selling countries (like Saudi Arabia) won't be too happy when USA stops buying their oil . Leftists promising the end to unemployment and guaranteeing full employment sounds too good to be true, and in reality, such a promise is unlikely to come to pass. These politicians will promise you the Moon, in order to get your votes, so why do you people still buy into their campaigns? Until those policies have been implemented, they are just empty promises that's all.
    1
  25026. +Gage Carlson What happens when Trump steps down after 4-8 years after his presidential term limit? Can you envision what America will be like 10 years from now? How about 20 years in the future? What if the next US president starts cancelling and reversing all of Trump's reforms? At the most US presidents can only make short term plans spanning not more than 10 years.
    1
  25027. AgarTron So many questions you asked, I'll try to answer them Companies and the private sector plan America's future, that's why USA goes to war with Middle East countries to control the oil and so the US defense industries can make profit from war. Americans often lament that the corporations control the government, not the other way round. Whereas in China, the corporations are mostly state-owned, so the government controls the corporations in China. Why do you entrust your countries future to a profit-driven corporations? In the US multi-party system, the Republicans and the Democrats seem to spene more time and money fighting each other, and blaming each other for America's woes, instead of trying to solve America's problems, and their actions may end up wasting precious resources. For example, the Obama Administration came up with the draft for the Trans Pacific Partnership, but after Trump was elected president, he cancelled the TPP, simply because Trump don't like Obama (Obama had humiliated Trump with his birth cert). All that money put in the TPP is wasted and gone down the drain. Whereas in China's One Party system, the communist party is responsible for all the good and bad things that happen to China. The CCP learns from past mistakes, and moves on, and tackles China's woes one by one, slowly and steadily. Already, the CCP has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 15-year plans, 20-year plans, etc, to map out China's direction and our future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc. By abolishing the presidential term limit, our leaders can remain in power to help see our long term plans bloom and come to fruition. But US presidents can only be in power for 4-8 years, so they make short term plans for USA, not spanning more than 10 years.
    1
  25028. +AgarTron But what happens when those companies start to control the government? Much of America's wealth is concentrated in only 1% of the population, and the remaining 99% of Americans always complain about it. If you let companies pursue profits, then that's exactly what they'll do. Prioritize profits over virtually everything else. Look the USA has been involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, etc, because of the oil, and American troops are dying on foreign soil, instead of fighting to defend America at home. The American mainland is hardly in any danger, yet America is still being involved in wars, because the US defense companies profit during war. About US private sectors, they have led to collapse of the US economy in the past, such as the Great Depression in 1930s as well as the more recent 2008 US financial crash. Its because you let your companies do whatever they want, and this is the result. China thus far, has not have a market crash of our own. Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. Here is compiled list of what Western journalists have to say about China's economy 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. But its already 2018 and China's economy is still going strong, and the West has been proven consecutively wrong in its predictions for nearly 30 years! So doesn't this demonstrate good planning on behalf of the Chinese government in handling economic issues within our country? Agreed that USA have the power to make change, but change can be good change as well as bad change. For example, President Trump is now starting a trade war with China, but what happens if he gets voted off, or his term ends after 4-8 years? His trade war with China will most likely discontinue, and the next POTUS may start reversing Trump's policies (just like when Trump reversed Obama's policies) For example, Obamacare was not perfect, but if functioned well and was stable for 8 years. Yet Trump wanted to repeal Obamacare and start his new one from scratch? Because Trump don't like Obama? With a multi-party system, parties can always blame each other for America woes. America's woes include rising debt, healthcare, gun control, and no US party wants to touch this bludgeoning problem. If you think this doesn't hinder USA, then these problems will only continue to grow and grow (because the parties don't want to solve it, and they expect the other party to solve it) Take gun control for example. In USA its much easier to obtain firearms to commit mass shootings in public schools or tourist attractions, by armed gunmen. A simple change to impose stricter laws on guns would probably solve/reduce the problem greatly, but Americans refuse to surrender their right to bear firearms. List of school shootings in the United States Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_school_shootings_in_the_United_States So many tragic shootings in US schools have occurred, because of poor gun control. Because nothing is being done about it, it can be predicted that more gun shootings will occur in the future, so why do you claim such a system isn't hindering USA? Because sooner or later USA will magically figure out a solution?
    1
  25029. +AgarTron Everyone has heard of Americans complaining how the US companies control the government, how the US banks control the government, and how the Jews/Zionist are taking over and controlling the government (sometimes the world). Just watch some videos or read comments about US economy, and you can encounter such people. For example, the then President Bush had invaded Iraq on suspicion of harboring WMDs, but no traces of WMDs were ever found. Its more likely USA invaded Iraq because of oil, and because of US oil companies. And all those US wars in the Middle East (Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, etc) they present new opportunities for US defense companies to showcase their wares and to justify the increase in US military spending. Most of the ordinary Americans don't want war, but then why USA still goes to war? US military spending is the world's highest, (more than the next 7-8 countries spending combined) and some of that money goes missing (probably into someone's pockets) $6.5 trillion missing from US Defense Department Source: wnd.com/2016/08/6-5-trillion-missing-from-defense-department/ China has corruption too yes, but at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-corruption crackdowns and many corrupt CCP officials have been taken down. But when's the last time USA had an anti-corruption crackdown of its own? In my personal opinion, Hiliary Clinton is corrupt, and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his presidential campaign. But after President Trump assumed office, no further action has been taken against Clinton. How is US companies going to innovate if it has such strict Intellectual Property rights? In my opinion, IP rights hinder innovation, because they encourage innovative people to come with a single idea, and then file for IP protection, and then slowly collect money from IP rights, instead of innovating a new idea. On the other hand, other creative people are restricted by the number of available tools, applications, ideas, because they don't want to incur copyright infringement. Thus, IP just encourage creative laziness, and otherwise innovative people only come up with a single good idea, and sit back and collect money from patents, and other struggling artists have to pay money to use such resources and are restricted from accessing the full spectrum of available tools. When did I said the USA learns from its mistakes? Can you highlight my words claiming that USA learns from its mistakes? If the USA truly learns from its mistakes, then why USA still get involve in more and more wars? Even economically, the Great Depression didn't teach US private companies anything, and that's why the 2008 Financial Crisis occurred again. I mean, you literally give power to the private corporations (who come and go) so what makes you think private corporations will learn from mistakes? They prioritize profits over anything else, and take risky moves without any promised support or fallback plan, and that's why Layman Brothers got bankrupted, and the 2008 Financial crisis occurred. If USA had learned from its mistakes then why did the financial crash happened again? About India, India is world's largest democracy, whereas China is communist. Republic of India was founded in 1947, whereas People's Republic of China was founded in 1949 (2 years later). As the world's 2nd largest population, the workforce in India is probably the same as the workforce in China. Indians can speak English, whereas many Chinese still struggle with English today. India had a free market whereas China's market was communist until 1970s. But despite India enjoying all these advantages, China has long overtaken India in various fields. China has the world's 2nd largest economy and our defense industry is stronger than India's. Poverty rates in China are much lower than in India. India's Global Hunger Index is 31.4(serious) compared to China's 7.5(low). China's literacy rate is 96.4% whereas India's literacy rate is 72.1%. Can you imagine that over 25% of Indian adults haven't been to school, yet they can vote for their government? I have already shown what Westerners been saying about China's economy, yet you still think China's economy will fail? About Chinese banks, they are the world's largest and you really think China is doing the same as American banks where in 2008? Don't forget that these are state-owned banks so they are controlled by the government, and are restricted to giving loans freely like your American banks. Wikipedia: List of largest banks Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks The problem is that all of America's woes (rising debt, gun control, military expenditure, etc) need more than 10 years to truly resolve, and no US president can hope to solve all of Americas problems, given his short presidential term of 4-8 years. USA appears to be suffering from what's called "political stagnation" where leaders are unable to solve problems, ineffective leadership and there is often scapegoating and victimization (such as blaming China for America's problems and portraying America as the victim) You just claim that "things will work out" but its clear that they aren't, and US problems are only going to pile up Wikipedia: Political stagnation Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_stagnation. Next US president could change Trump's policies (just like when Trump easily changed Obama's policies) so why do you claim that it isn't easy? The US trade war with China is unpopular with US farmers and other people so why do you claim it is unlikely to stop? It will probably be the 1st one to go, since like I said, US corporations are interested in making profit and a trade war will only lessen their profits. So why would US corporations support a trade war, when its not in the best interests of business? I've notices that most of your points are just "yeah, things will get better, things will pull through, etc" and you don't really elaborate on your points well enough, or cite actual sources to support your points. If you just leave things to fate, then there's no guarantee that things will proceed as you say. But if you have a stable single-party government like China, then you can implement far-reaching long term policies and make long-term plans spanning far in to the future. The CCP has put forth 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, etc. and that's why Chinese people can look forward to a bright future, whereas USA lacks long-term planning and instead, you entrust your plans to corporations? I mean, what happens if those US corporations close down suddenly? There goes your long term plan for US economy,
    1
  25030.  @kirb_erus  Exactly what do you know about China? Did you know China sees on average, some 500 protests daily? In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010. (or an average of 493 protests every day)
    1
  25031.  @peabase  Mainland China will retain control over Hong Kong, so how exactly is China the biggest loser then?
    1
  25032.  @desanipt  In the past, Hong Kong was a world finance centre and thriving port city closest to mainland China, but today, it has since fallen behind and been overtaken by rising mainland cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhoushan, and is facing increasing competition from upcoming mainland port cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian, and so on. No wonder why the people of Hong Kong fear being left behind. Sources: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage As you can see, mainland China would be hardly affected economically. If only Hong Kong was fully returned back to China, then Chinese government can help develop Hong Kong to catch up with other rising mainland port cities.
    1
  25033. Chinese farms are so efficient as to feed 21% of worlds population with only 7% arable land, and still have surplus for export. Chinese farmers accomplished this feat by cutting huge terraces into hills and mountains to create more arable land to grow rice. This practice has also been adopted by many Asian countries. Today rice is staple of many people's diets and consumed by some of world's most populous countries like China, India and Indonesia. Besides rice, China also has worlds highest agricultural output countries for vegetables and the world's biggest pig farms and sheep farms are located here. Chinese fish farms contribute about 62% of worlds aquaculture industy and Chinese fishing industry also makes up about 1/3 of the entire world. Because of all the above reasons, China is able to support world's largest population throughout most of history.
    1
  25034. Move Aside Move Forward!
    1
  25035. +wendef ung "String of Pearls" is merely a geopolitical theory, and it doesn't mean much in reality. Otherwise, why is it China only has 1 overseas base in Dijibouti? Which International Court of Arbitration ruling are you referring to in 2016? According to preliminary statistics, a total of 966 new cases administered by the Court were filed in 2016 – involving 3,099 parties from 137 countries, so you expect me to shift through all of those cases? International Court of Arbitration 2016 Source: iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/icc-international-court-arbitration/ Who says YT is prohibited in China? In China nobody comes to arrest you if you access Youtube while in China, so how is it prohibited?
    1
  25036. It's a herculean task to solve America's problems. The first task is to take away power from the U.S Military Industrial Complex, a nigh impossible task in itself. Only then can American finally began healing.
    1
  25037.  @hjon5988  Cyrus Janssen's videos consistently promote the message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls", so if you're saying that Cyrus is on China's payroll, then are you saying that the Communist Party of China is promoting this peaceful message? Then frankly speaking, isn't peace a better option than promoting war instead?
    1
  25038.  @cwliu7655  You said: "It seems to me that Cyrus never suggests how ccp dealing with western countries but the opposite." Because Cyrus is an American citizen himself, and he's living in Canada at the moment, so he can't change China or affect the Communist Party. But as an American citizen himself, Cyrus has the right to speak out against his country going to war with China, because such a scenario would not only be deleterious for both our countries, but for the rest of the world as well.
    1
  25039.  @hjon5988  So you're claiming that Cyrus Janssen is somehow being paid by China to promote his peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" then it's that actually a good thing? It's no secret today that U.S-China relations have deteriorated to their lowest levels in decades and a hot conflict erupting between USA and China is not only deleterious for out countries, but for the rest of the world in fact. So isn't it good that Cyrus Janssen is helping to clear up misunderstandings that Westerners have about China through his videos? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. So if anything, it looks like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  25040.  @blam1328  The two nations that are engaged in a global geopolitical campaign today of course.
    1
  25041.  @MarkYeung1  China's propaganda clearly isn't effective and urgently needs improvement. Hardly anyone believe what CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV says even though they cite data from primary sources. Whereas Western propaganda is very effective, and many people just blindly believe what Western MSM says about China even when it's unsubstantiated by sources.
    1
  25042.  @MarkYeung1  Hardly anyone believe what CGTN, CCTV, Xinhua (New China) TV says even though they cite data from primary sources. Whereas Western propaganda is very effective, and many people just blindly believe what Western MSM says about China even when it's unsubstantiated by sources. China's propaganda cannot hold a candle to the U.S's
    1
  25043. Who needs enemies when you have a friend like USA.
    1
  25044.  @Epistemophilia7  I don't know what sarcastic comment you wrote, but sometimes sarcasm just doesn't translate well into text form. A tip: If you're trying to be sarcastic, it's best to grrrooosssly exxaaggeeraate your statements, so that sarcasm can be picked up. Or include a footnote like "I was sarcastic" at the end of your post. As for Cyrus, he reads tonnes of comments every day, perhaps he could have misunderstood your post after a brief glance.
    1
  25045.  @bingdd168  "神州 Shenzhou Then why didn't they take proactive action to get more elderly vaccinated? They could have done more to convince and motivate the elderly." As far as I know, every country has this same issue that China experiences, with the elderly folk refusing to get vaccinated. Many older people in USA, UK, Canada, Australia, France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, etc also refuse to get vaccinated, either for medical reasons or out of fear of vaccines. Even in countries with a 80-90% vaccinated population, there are still elderly folk that refuse to get vaccinated. There's only so much a government can do to educate and persuade its elderly population to take the vaccine. But if that fails, then another option is temporary lockdown until the number of cases falls to an acceptable level.
    1
  25046.  @bingdd168  As far as I know, every country has this same issue that China experiences, with the elderly folk refusing to get vaccinated. Many older people in USA, UK, Canada, Australia, France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, etc also refuse to get vaccinated, either for medical reasons or out of fear of vaccines. Even in countries with a 80-90% vaccinated population, there are still elderly folk that refuse to get vaccinated. There's only so much a government can do to educate and persuade its elderly population to take the vaccine. But if that fails, then another option is temporary lockdown until the number of cases falls to an acceptable level.
    1
  25047.  @WatchingMindlesslySince2006  "The controversy follows a series of acerbic anonymous posts on the Paris embassy’s website, ascribed to a Chinese diplomat," What's the name of this Chinese diplomat who allegedly said such a thing? Have you verified that it's really a Chinese diplomat who said that, and not more fake news?
    1
  25048.  @kellikelli4413  What deliberate cruelty? If Covid-19 is allowed to infect Shanghai, then more elderly people will die.
    1
  25049.  @kellikelli4413  More elderly people in Shanghai will die if Covid spreads uncontrollably, how is that deliberate cruelty?
    1
  25050.  @kellikelli4413  How is it a scam?
    1
  25051.  @kellikelli4413  Do you want more elderly people in Shanghai to be exposed to the virus?
    1
  25052.  @MarkYeung1  But if elderly vaccination rate of Shanghai is 62% (indicated in Cyrus' video) then right now, lockdown is still the preferred way to prevent unnecessary deaths of elderly.
    1
  25053.  @MarkYeung1  Who's playing words with you? You said it's unacceptable for a crowded, world class city like Shanghai, yet for Hong Kong, you just said it's embarrassing, that's all, and the words are there for anyone to see.
    1
  25054.  @MarkYeung1  The fact that even right now, that there are tragically around 100 deaths of Canadians because of Covid, indicates that the Canadian government doesn't have a responsibility to keep people safe like you claim. Also, voting out the Canadian government doesn't solve the problem, whereas the Chinese government takes proactive steps to save as many lives from Covid as possible.
    1
  25055.  @MarkYeung1  I check the polls and it seems Canadian PM Justin Trudeu's approval ratings for Mar-2022 is 39% approval and 57% disapproval. Justin Trudeu's administration is basically "underwater" as they call it.
    1
  25056.  @WatchingMindlesslySince2006  What's the name of the Chinese diplomat that allegedly wrote such inflammatory words? Can you give me his/her name?
    1
  25057.  @WatchingMindlesslySince2006  So I take it that you don't know what's the name of the Chinese diplomat that allegedly made such inflammatory comments? Then how can you say it was China who was behind it?
    1
  25058.  @MarkYeung1  Quebec, Canada's second most populous province, is planning to force adults refusing to get COVID-19 vaccinated pay a "health contribution" in a move likely to spur a debate about individual rights and social responsibility. (this is taken from Western media like Reuters) Another thing to note is that China had the Covid-19 situation largely under control, that's why many elderly in China do not see the need to vaccinate. Wheres in Canada, the virus is allowed to spread uncontrollably (sadly average of 100 Canadians are dying to Covid every day) that's why elderly see the need to vaccinate. Because the Canadian government doesn't seem to be doing the job of protecting the people.
    1
  25059.  @MarkYeung1  China had the Covid-19 situation largely under control, that's why many elderly in China do not see the need to vaccinate. Wheres in Canada, the virus is allowed to spread uncontrollably (sadly average of 100 Canadians are dying to Covid every day) that's why elderly see the need to vaccinate. Because the Canadian government doesn't seem to be doing the job of protecting the people.
    1
  25060.  @MarkYeung1  1st dose alone is insufficient, you'll need a 2nd dose which has to be taken after 21-28 days after the 1st dose, and a further 1-2 weeks before you'll be considered having the sufficient level of antibodies. Also, being fully vaccinated is not immunity, you can still catch the virus even while fully vaccinated. Please be informed yourself. Did you get vaccinated yourself? Why is it you know so little about how long it takes to acquire sufficient antibodies, if you've been vaccinated?
    1
  25061.  @kammonkam4905  Those Canadian truckers protesting the vaccine mandates are one such example. Some of those truckers purportedly even had their bank accounts frozen, just for protesting which is a Canadian right.
    1
  25062.  @TheNewGreenIsBlue  The elderly in Canada had the highest vaccination rate because the Canadian government just let Covid-19 ravage their country's population. If the Canadian government don't protect their elderly, then the elderly feel the urgency to vaccinate themselves. Sadly, even till today, there are at least 100 deaths daily in Canada due to Covid-19. Whereas in China, the Chinese government did such a good job handling the Covid-19 outbreak, that unfortunately, many elderly people don't feel the urgency to vaccinate and believe that they can continue to postpone their vaccination. As for the divide between older and younger in China than Canada, remember that China has changed so much in just decades that the older generation finds difficulty keeping up to date with the younger generation is all.
    1
  25063.  @TheNewGreenIsBlue  "神州 Shenzhou Yep, and remember... those truckers were a very vocal minority even among truckers." The same applies to Shanghai, those people protesting lockdown only applies to a very vocal minority of the residents in Shanghai. Majority of the people in China believe that lockdown is necessary in order to combat the virus. "Few feel that it was a protest. It was a revolt... with crazy demands like demanding the Prime Minister be removed. It was trending towards political anarchy." If Canadians think demanding their Prime Minister be removed is crazy, I've lost track of the number of times many Westerners (but not all) seem to think Chinese all want to overthrow the Chinese government.
    1
  25064.  @TheNewGreenIsBlue  Jurassic Park is a work of fiction, which is not the same as reality. Writers of fiction often exaggerate the negative effects of say technology, going against nature, climate change, or any topic, primarily for entertainment purposes, in order to attract readership and get their books published. But what happens in the book may not necessarily be what happens in reality, that's why it's fiction.
    1
  25065.  @TheNewGreenIsBlue  If anything, you're just confirming my theory that Canadian elderly had to vaccinate because the Canadian government choose to do nothing about it, so the elderly had to take matters into their own hands and vaccinate themselves. On 13th April there was a surge of 261 Covid deaths due in Canada, so 100 deaths daily was just an estimate on my part. 1 death is too many I agree and if a patient has underlying conditions, contracted Covid and died, doesn't that still imply that catching Covid caused the person's death? Had that person not contracted the virus, it's possible that he/she would still be alive. "Do you build a bigger tsunami wall, or do you convince people to build on higher ground." The thing is China has the capability to build a bigger tsunami wall, through implementing lockdowns (of which in other countries, would face massive backlash). When the tsunami arrives, it's too late to build on higher ground, why not use the existing wall that was pre-built as part of the zero Covid policy? "The people of Fukushima found this out the hard way." China is NOT Japan, and Shanghai is NOT Fukushima. I don't know why do you keep comparing China with Japan (even though you said it's pointless to compare countries). If anything, China and South Korea protested the Japanese government just releasing contaminated Fukushima water into the sea.
    1
  25066.  @TheNewGreenIsBlue  Canada has recorded a death toll of nearly 40k due to the virus, how is the word "ravage" not appropriate?
    1
  25067.  @TheNewGreenIsBlue  How am I not on the people's side? I've been advocating that although the loss of income is regrettable, but money loss can still be earned back. But once those elderly people lose their lives, no amount of money can buy back those lives that have been lost. Whereas you just quote works of fiction like Jurassic Park, who's going to believe you?
    1
  25068.  @MarkYeung1  You've been giving out incorrect information, you said 2 weeks, when in actual fact you have to wait 21-28 days to take the 2nd dose (plus an additional 2 weeks) to become fully vaccinated and attain an acceptable level of antibodies. Furthermore, being fully vaccinated does not grant immunity, you can still contract the illness even after vaccination, even Cyrus got infected after his vaccination. Yet you keep throwing out the word "immunity" around when it's just not true.
    1
  25069.  @TheNewGreenIsBlue  China's tsunami walls have met with great success. China recorded only 4k deaths due to Covid-19, whereas Canada recorded a death toll of nearly nearly 40k due to Covid, so how is it limited success? And do you have actual evidence for your claim that China doesn't record patient who died from complications arising from Covid-19?
    1
  25070.  @TheNewGreenIsBlue  Look, you're the one quoting works of fiction like Jurassic Park as somehow being reflective of reality, but you know that authors write those stories primarily to entertain their audiences and attract readers. So how can quoting fictional works even apply to reality?
    1
  25071. The Hong Kong Police arrested the HK rioters, who turned out to be high school kids from Hong Kong (like those featured here) so how are they from the mainland?
    1
  25072.  @mimikurtz2162  According to the Labour Law of the People's Republic of China, all units and individuals are prohibited from providing job placement service to minors under the age of 16. Article 3 states that the parents or guardians of minors under the age of 16 shall protect their physical and mental health, safeguard their rights to compulsory education and shall not permit them to be illegally hired by employing units.
    1
  25073.  @mimikurtz2162  The People's Republic of China Labor Law prohibited employment of children under the age of 16.
    1
  25074.  @juliaweber5026  Yes, USA has been accused of holding hostage some 200,000 masks bound for Germany from China, an act that's been called "modern piracy" Video: German official: U.S. hijacked supply of masks in Bangkok youtu.be/7_58an4yIhw _A German official has accused Washington of "modern-day piracy," after 200,000 masks bound for Germany were confiscated by the U.S. at a Bangkok airport. Berlin's state minister of the interior, Andreas Geisel, said in a statement on Friday that the highly sought-after masks were made by an American firm in China and destined for use by Berlin police. The statement said it's assumed to be in connection with the U.S. export ban on masks. _
    1
  25075. The video hardly talked at all about the One Child Policy, maybe about 1-2 minutes out of the whole 11 minutes video.
    1
  25076. +Zach O Opening up immigration brings about its own set of social problems for the people. In America for example, the immigrants to America may not assimilate into American culture. Muslims refugees and immigrants come to a predominantly Christian country, but choose to retain their traditional religious beliefs and practices (because American laws allow them to do so with impunity) E.g. Muslim women continue wear Muslim headveils in public, and even you are okay with it, many other local Americans aren't happy with Muslims not assimilating into American culture. Furthermore, non-Muslims have to convert to Islam when marrying into Muslim family (whereas becoming Christian is matter of choice) and that's how Islam "propagates" throughout Western Christian countries. At least in China, we are stricter on immigration, so that our own local culture, our language and way of life is preserved, instead of being diluted by immigration like in America.
    1
  25077. +Zach O What makes you think that Americans will get over the influx of immigrants? Because nobody is complaining about them? In America, you have this culture of 'political correctness' where people are reluctant to voice their true opinions for fear of offending some minority group (or feminists, LGBT activists, etc,) and being labelled as "racist". Because of this, many disgruntled Americans hide their true opinions of immigrants to themselves, and it gives off the false appearance that everything is fine on the surface, when it is not. You yourself may be okay with this, but that's just your own belief, and many Caucasian Americans don't share your opinion. For example, there was this incident where a Caucasian American woman confronted two Spanish speaking Mexican women in Colorado. American Woman Berates Mexicans For Speaking Spanish video: youtube.com/watch?v=tive6AwWFWQ&feature=youtu.be You're right that America is becoming a melting pot of races, cultures and religion. But that is precisely why America is going to suffer from a identity crisis, as the numerous races and culture within America compete to challenge what it means to be an American. As more immigrants flood into America, the immigrants are less compelled to speak English, less compelled to follow American traditions and culture, and instead they retain their home countries cultural beliefs and practices and bring them to America, much to the dismay of Caucasian Americans. As for China, we are already the most populous country in the world, and its possible that there aren't enough resources to support our population, so why should we accept more immigrants to compete with locals for education and jobs? Why dilute our Chinese culture and language with immigrants? Statistically speaking, with our large population, we have the most brainpower to come up with ideas, and the most manpower to implement those ideas and turn them into reality.
    1
  25078. +Belen Cerda Luna I assume you are Zach O and are responding in his/her place. Because Chinese have been living in China for so long (China has 5000 years of history) our cultural identity is strong enough to endure the passage of time. But modern America only has about 200-300 years of history (if you consider American Civil War to be start of American identity) and there's no guarantee that America's young identity will last. A strong common identity is what binds a country together, without it your country is pulled in different directions and torn apart. You said Irish and German immigrants assimilated into American culture, but did the Chinese (that you mentioned earlier) assimilate as well? What about the Mexicans/Hispanics? The stronger the homecountry's racial/language identity, the more resistant the immigrants are to assimilation. Hispanics and Asians tend to have strong identities and that's why they are most resistant to assimilation. Otherwise, why only Germans and Irish assimilated, but not Hispanics and Chinese? Ah, you must still be studying, from your high school life description and that you need your parent's permission to charge your device. Let me tell you straight up that the real world is NOT like the controlled environment of high school. People speak whatever they want outside of school. American schools offer English yes, but they also offer Spanish classes as well, and this gives incentives for non-English speakers to continue speaking their mother tongue. Enjoy your high school life while it lasts, but remember that once you venture out into the real world, you'll find problems that school environments can't simulate, and start to understand why Caucasian Americans feel about their identity being threatened.
    1
  25079. +Snickering Ginger You changed your name from Zach O? You clearly didn't make any reply after my last comment addressed to you, so how have I missed out what you said? USA hasn't gotten over the Chinese. I've been to parts of USA (such as Ames, Iowa, Minneapolis, etc) and some people still make accusations against me (Stop Stealing our jobs! or Go Back to China!) I'm aware that not every American is like that, but it shows a deep seated resentment towards foreigners shared by Caucasian Americans. I mean, just because they don't say it out loud, doesn't mean its not present inside their minds. But in America, you have a culture of "Political Correctness" so nobody can voice their true opinions for fear of being labelled "racists". So how exactly are these unhappy Americans going to have a voice of their own, if people attack them for their honest views? You can't remove racism by attacking people who make racist remarks (because these are their honest opinions after all) so How Politically Correct Culture Promotes Racism Video: youtube.com/watch?v=nqq7_1VI7v4 You said: "Note that those videos that you find almost always feature old people, not younger generations who have grown up surrounded by diversity." My video was from some American (I don't know his age, but he sounds young) and he's grown up in Mexico and speaks Spanish, yet he agrees that Mexicans should at least follow American rules while in America. I mean, you obviously can't speak for your entire generation (and also, people's views change as they grow older) so what makes you think your current generation will hold its values, once exposed to the reality of the real world? About China's system, China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt eventually faded to history. China has seen the rise and fall of many other nations and we survived the violent passage of history to where we are today, because China has always been authoritarian (ruled by Emperor and his imperial court, or by a centralized power like the CCP). But modern Western democracy only has about 200-300 years of history, and there's no guarantee that such a system will last. Elections are very controversial topics and people always frame them in whatever angles they want to. For example, people could have voted for Democrats, simply because they don't like Trump, but it doesn't mean that they agree with the liberal's mindset, isn't it? You said Trump was just the last dying gasp of an outdated way of thinking, then why on Earth did Trump get elected in the first place? Because Americans were unhappy with the way immigrants were flooding your countries in the first place. That's the main problem with your system. The American people are fickle, and easily change minds and votes, so that nothing remains constant. Who knows, maybe the next election, the Republicans will win? Americans may not even be politically savvy enough to make the correct decisions regarding the country's future, yet you still allow them to vote? For what? Why not let the people who are qualified to govern the country, govern? Why involve the public's opinion, which can mess up the government policies? About weed legalization and gay marriage, why do you want to legalize a potentially addictive drug (and why do you think its a good thing?) What if people get addicted to it and sell off their houses and property to acquire more of it? Marijuana is banned by most countries in the world (for good reason) and you think that it's good for America to legalize it? About gay marriage, throughout most of history, the basic family unit consists of the father/husband and mother/wife/wives and any children they had. Why do you want to break up the basic family unit (that all of humanity has been following till now) and allow same sex couples to get married? Because its considered liberal and "progressive" to do such a thing? About China's ability to produce food, China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land, and still produce enough surplus food to export to other countries. We are home to the world's largest pig and sheep farms. In global fishing industry, China's fish stocks make up 1/3 of the world's fish production and our fish farms make up 2/3 of the world's aquaculture. China has world's largest pig stocks wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig_farming China has world's largest sheep stocks wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheep_farming Fishing industry in China Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishing_industry_in_China China ranks 1st in worldwide agricultural output, primarily producing rice, wheat, onions, cabbage, green bean, cauliflowers, eggplant, potator, spinach, carrots, cucumbers, pumpkins, sweet potato, and many many more. List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_producing_countries_of_agricultural_commodities So why do you claim America is going to be holding China over a bread basket for leverage? About India overtaking China, can India even afford to feed its current population, let alone grow its population to surpass China's?
    1
  25080. +Snickering Ginger I am not talking about the life of the immigrants, I'm talking about how Americans truly feel about Immigrants coming to America and slowly displacing them over time. Here's an example, the Muslim refugees and immigrants come to USA but instead of assimilating into the predominantly Christian society, Muslims retain their old traditions and beliefs (because American laws allow them to) and Muslim women can wear Muslim headveil out in public, and are under little pressure to assimilate to American values. Many Americans are secretly angry that the Muslims can continue their ways while in their new host country, but they can't voice their true opinion for fear of being labelled "Islamophobe" (fear of Islam) Once again, its the American culture of Political Correctness, preventing Americans from voicing their true opinion, but you just take American silence as acceptance of foreign cultures? Non-Muslims must convert to Islam when they marry Muslims, whereas being Christian is a matter of choice, so over time, the number of Christians in USA decreases, while the number of Muslims in America increases, changing the religious demographics of USA over time. U.S. Muslim population to double by 2030 youtube.com/watch?v=vSGNybMDTgI You can bet that even Caucasian Americans themselves are going to be fearful of being displaced by Muslims. Even when they don't outright say anything for fear of being offensive. About the Opium War, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so the British wages two bloody wars with China and forced us to buy opium from them, which we didn't want, because it made us sick and was slowly poisoning our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to pump the addiction throughout rest of China, and Hong Kong was stolen and made into a British Colony. What did Chinese people do to deserve this? China don't invade your Western countries and sell you addictive substances. And look at Britain today. Britain was colonial superpower in 19th century, but was eventually overtaken by USA in 20th century. But China was superpower for 1800 years (our GDP was more than USA and Britain from 1-1800 AD) prior to 19th century Global GDP from 1-2003 AD (by Angus Maddison) wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA_Middle_East.png Your video by Thomas P.M. Barnett, he is someone who believes in the USA "exporting security" (aka declaring war) to other countries, such as prior to the Iraq War and he's a self-proclaimed economic determinist. But where does he get his qualifications to talk about economics, when he's graduated with bachelor of Russian language and literature, and international relations with an emphasis in U.S. foreign policy? He clearly doesn't study climate change or economics, so why you think he's qualified to explain how China will depend on USA because of climate change? I mean, China even has the technology to grow food in the arid deserts, according to the following video Watch This New Technology in China That Converts Desert Into Productive Land Rich With Crops Video: youtube.com/watch?v=jkdxObsCVGY You said: "You're closer to the equator, so you're going to be much more adversely affected by drought" As far as I know, the equator experiences higher rainfall, and it is unknown how climate change will affect rainfall near the equator. A warmer atmosphere can hold more moisture, and globally water vapour increases by 7% for every degree centigrade of warming. Nobody knows the true extent of climate change impacting rainfall, but there's evidence to show that regions that are already wet are likely to get wetter, while drier places are likely to get drier How will climate change affect rainfall? theguardian.com/environment/2011/dec/15/climate-change-rainfall I mean, why you just make simple statements like "You're closer to the equator so you will be much more adversely affected by drought" without doing proper research? Instead you take your source from some military guy, who doesn't study climate change and economics? What makes you think democracy lasts? Throughout history, democracy has a history of failure and Athenian Democracy failed, Spartan Democracy failed, Greek Democracy failed, and the Republic of Rome fell. Modern Western democracy is only 200-300 years, so what makes you think it will last, given other historical democracies have failed? Instead, many ancient nations had systems where power is held by the elite few, such as nobles (aristocracy), priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy). That's because such people tend to be educated and able to make important political decisions regarding the countries' future, and that's why their systems were the most popular and stable throughout history. So many ancient countries had kings, nobles, priests or other educated, politically savvy people making all the big decisions, and many survived because of this. About this video, all China needs to do is increase the birth rate that's all and there are numerous ways of doing it. China has successfully shrunk our population birth rate, and so who says the reverse can't happen and China can't improve our birth rate? However, the government hasn't found it necessary to drastically increase the birth rate yet. Also, technology can play a part in helping China take care of the elderly. Already, China is world's largest market for robots and automation and we opened Asia's 1st fully automatic port in Qingdao. Automation is much more efficient since they can work 24 hours, well into the night and are less likely to make human mistakes. Asia’s first automated container terminal, at Port of Qingdao, China youtube.com/watch?v=bn2GPNJmR7A Here's a video about automation in China's warehouse Robots sorting system helps Chinese company finish at least 200,000 packages a day in the warehouse youtube.com/watch?v=_QndP_PCRSw In the same way China deals with automation, in the future we might have automated caregivers helping take care of China's elderly in order to ease the burden on younger Chinese. Its one possible solution for our problem. India started 60 million to death? I assume you mean "starved" but every year, Indians die from starvation, their children suffer from high malnutrition rates (more than 1/3 of the world's malnourished children live in India) so what makes you think India hasn't starved 60 million of their own to death? Can you get the actual figures to prove your claim? Malnutrition in India Statistics State Wise savethechildren.in/articles/malnutrition-in-india-statistics-state-wise Taken from the above source: World Bank data indicates that India has one of the world’s highest demographics of children suffering from malnutrition – said to be double that of Sub-Saharan Africa with dire consequences. India’s Global Hunger Index India ranking of 67 the 80 nations with the worst hunger situation places us even below North Korea or Sudan. 44% of children under the age of 5 are underweight, while 72% of infants have anaemia So how did you arrive at your figure that India hasn't starved millions to death? You just make up claims and figures with no proof of your own?
    1
  25081. laowhy is clearly unhappy living in China. Why force himself to live in China when he doesn't seem to be enjoying his life? Nobody point a gun at him and force him to live in China if he doesn't want to.
    1
  25082. +Stephen Arias "You should embrace the constructive criticism to better your country." What makes you think that constructive criticism will automatically better the country? Look at USA with so much ongoing criticism, but does USA actually reflect on this criticism? For example, USA has loose gun laws, which make it easier to commit crimes such as robbery since ordinary people have easier access to firearms. Caucasian policemen also sometimes shoot the African American suspect dead and ask questions later (because of possibility of the suspect being armed with guns) There have been tragic spate of US school shootings by armed gunmen, but Americans refuse to amend their gun laws and to surrender the right to bear arms. Now look at China. The government readily censors information and its difficult to criticize the government within China. But the government still gets things done quite efficiently. China built the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam which supplies China with a huge amount of renewable green energy to power our growth and reduce pollution. Chinese government is also making plans to ban coal power in some regions, and already China is the world's largest market for electric vehicles, buses and so on. You talked about constructive criticism when China is working hard to improve our country daily as compared to American? Didn't President Trump promise to bring coal power back to America, and even withdrew USA from the 2017 Paris Climate Accord, thus not limiting USA's CO2 emissions?
    1
  25083. +Stephen Arias "Most of the Chinese people I know that are from the Mainland can’t handle when others, even their own people criticize China." I can also say that most Americans that I know can't handle when others, even other Americans criticize America. You said immigrants allow a society to become more open to innovate ideas to better their country. Then why are Americans complaining about the immigrants coming to America? Look at the Muslims coming to America, but refusing to adopt American culture, and they retain their own Muslim culture instead. By opening your doorways to everyone, then the foreign cultures will start to dilute the local American culture and America starts to undergo an identity crisis. So why should China follow America and just let everyone in? China is not America and America is not China. The "American Dream" is that any poor immigrant to America can eventually strike it rich some day. But the "Chinese Dream" is the eventual rejuvenation of China. For that, we need immigrants who actually contribute to China, and that's why the government scrutinize every immigrant to China and only admit the best possible people in. I mean, if you let everyone into your country, then both the good immigrants and bad immigrants will come. But if you're like China, and only admit the good people (doctors, lawyers, engineers, scientists, etc) and reject the undesirables (refugees, political dissidents, deadbeats, etc) then over a course of time, your country will start to improve.
    1
  25084. +Donald Grant If Chinese workers competitive enough to do same work for lower pay, then why say it like Chinese workers steal your jobs? Are Americans able to do same work as Chinese workers for same low pay to achieve the same cost of living? If not, then companies will simply not hire your workers that's all. Why blame Chinese workers for being competitive and more hard working?
    1
  25085. +Ji-Hoon Moon China is losing competitiveness to other low wage countries like Vietnam, but majority of product are still made in China today. Why do you look down on our 10 cent wage? Chinese people worked hard and it was the millions of 10 cents made over the years that brought Chinese people out of poverty.
    1
  25086.  @MarkYeung1  That's why I said it's a "loophole" under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty that nuclear power submarines aren't banned. So a non-nuclear country like Australia can potentially reverse-engineer the ability to acquire weapons-grade nuclear material through nuclear submarines.
    1
  25087.  @MarkYeung1  "For example, Japan had nuclear power ship but never had nuclear weapons" But does Japan have a nuclear submarine? No? Then what if Australia decides to reverse engineer nuclear submarine technology to gain access to weapons grade nuclear materials? That's what I meant by a loophole, do you know what's the meaning of loophole?
    1
  25088.  @MarkYeung1  Nuclear submarines are fueled by the same weapons-grade nuclear materials as those used in nuclear bombs. What if Australia decides to reverse engineer the nuclear submarine technology to find out how to enrich uranium? Or what if Australia decides to order more enriched nuclear material on the pretext for their nuclear submarines fuel, but end up using the weapons-grade nuclear materials for making bombs?
    1
  25089. ​ @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Japanese can have a nuclear submarine if she wants. China has many nuclear submarines." But Japan clearly don't, because the trading of nuclear submarine technology is clearly very sensitive between nuclear and non-nuclear states. And China has many nuclear submarines, because we are a nuclear state, whereas Japan and Australia aren't nuclear states.
    1
  25090.  @nancanchineseh8r438  Has either China or India declared war with each other? No bullet have been fired across the Sino-Indian border for over 40 years.
    1
  25091. @Sheriff Lobo So if you're okay with Iran and North Korea having nuclear weapons, then why does the United States continue to sanction DPRK and undermine the Iran nuclear deal?
    1
  25092. @Sheriff Lobo You said: "Name one recent instance where the CCP has admitted a mistake." Dr Li Wenliang have been exonerated by the government, and Wuhan police formally apologised to his family and revoked his earlier admonishment. In April 2020, Li was posthumously awarded the May Fourth Medal by the government.
    1
  25093.  @nancanchineseh8r438  "神州 Shenzhou They fought with rocks." And the United States dronestrike an innocent Afghan man loading his car with water bottles.
    1
  25094.  @UncleSF888  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Which country is the true threat to global peace here?
    1
  25095. Cyrus Janssen says many positive things about China that unfortunately, many Americans don't like to hear, so it's unlikely that he will be democratically elected. Anti-China sentiment has bipartisan support from both the Democrats and the Republicans.
    1
  25096. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  25097. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  25098. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  25099. Many older folk in Taiwan still remember their family ties to the mainland, even after they fled to Taiwan, and even till today, they retain their sense of connection to China and being Chinese. Recent revisions to the island's history textbooks, however, have given birth to a new generation of youth that has grown distant from the mainland.
    1
  25100. If there is gender imbalance in China, there are other ways to make up for it, such as importing Vietnamese brides for example. Just a suggestion is all.
    1
  25101. +Aslan Ekhwan The lower class won't be poor forever. Already the government is making efforts to lift more poor people out of poverty and rural workers are migrating to the cities to find jobs to eventually become middle class. Also, how is it you claim that the lower class Chinese can be found on YouTube? Where do they get the money to purchase VPN and log on to YouTube? Are they educated in English to post comments here?
    1
  25102. +Aslan Ekhwan I never said that everybody can become millionaire. Why are you deliberately twisting my words? And who says 20% of Chinese society is poor? According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 6.5% in 2012, so apparently, China does not have 20% poverty like in other countries. Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Well, you weren't clear when you said "You can find some of them on YouTube" so I assumed you referred to those lower class Chinese. Personally think the gender gap issue can be tackled. For example, according to the following source, leftover men in rural China can purchase Vietnamese brides for prices around 20,000 yuan. Rural Chinese Men Are Buying Vietnamese Brides For $3,200 businessinsider.com/rural-chinese-men-are-buying-vietnamese-brides-for-3200-2014-8/?IR=T Of course, I just hope the Chinese government put in more effort to make the transactions legal not illegal.
    1
  25103. In truth, he talked for like 2 mins on the One Child Policy throughout the 11 min video.
    1
  25104. China's life expectancy at birth actually surpassed the United States'.
    1
  25105.  @makavelii7  Since you claimed that it's property of the Australian Aboriginals, do the aboriginals get a cut of the revenue?
    1
  25106.  @Pepperstein  Many Western men find Chinese women (and also other Asian women like Japanese and Koreans) attractive because they retain traditional notions of feminine beauty. They diet and exercise to keep their bodies slim and attractive, they take care of their skin, applying moisturisers and using umbrellas to shield from harmful UV rays. If you're lucky, you might even find Chinese girl who knows how to cook home-cooked meals. Whereas feminist is taking over the West and encouraging Western women to dominate their men, to wear the pants in relationships and sometimes even act downright hostile to men. Young, slim, beautiful Western girls are being encouraged to eat whatever they want, act as unfeminine as possible, to get tattoos and piercings all over their bodies, to grow fat and unattractive, and yet, feminists will tell these women that men will find them attractive. Some men do but not all. No wonder why some men are simply fed up with the state of feminism in the West, and some started seeking out partners from Asian countries. Because feminism is destroying what it means to be female in the West.
    1
  25107.  @mrofftopic2802  That's the beauty of Chinese laws. -China: All land belongs to the state, it is forbidden to own land even to local Chinese. -Other countries: Land can be sold, even to foreigners like Chinese investors. Overtime, who do you think will benefits and who will suffers? Your lands are for sale to Chinese investors, but our lands are not for sale to foreigners (or to local Chinese to sell to foreigners)
    1
  25108.  @mrofftopic2802  What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  25109. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure.
    1
  25110.  @-JustHuman-  You did the math yes, but again, crematoriums cremate bodies who died of all sorts of causes (i.e Old age, traffic accidents, illnesses other than Covid-19) so how do you prove that all those bodies were from people who died of Covid-19? Otherwise, this is just your own speculation that's all, no concrete evidence that China is lying about the death count. Remember that Wuhan was under lockdown at that time. That means lots of shipments, deliveries, business transactions have gotten postponed or delayed, and this includes crematorium operations. The sudden surge of cremation operations could be because the crematorium was trying to clear a backlog that was accumulated as a result of Wuhan lockdown causing many business activities to cease temporarily. ... You said: "Chinese hospitals are very bad compared to most modern countries( even compared to 3'rd world countries really), they have worse education, equipment and more people to serve pr. hospital. Yet, they should some how have a smaller death toll than countries with modern equipment and higher level of care how ?" Because China was swift to lockdown Wuhan and even built temporary hospitals like 1000-bed Huoshenshan (火神山医院) hospital in 10 days. Video: Time-lapse of Huoshenshan hospital built in 10 days_ youtu.be/TuxhHsRSzGw China also built a second 1,500-bed Leishenshan (雷神山医院) hospital in 12 days. Video: Time-lapse video shows how Leishenshan Hospital completed in 12 days youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk This is how China was able to handle Covid-19 compared to other countries with modern equipment and higher level of care.
    1
  25111.  @-JustHuman-  Earlier you said: "The CCP is know for lying, it already started when they claimed they fought the Japanese back, when it was the Nationalist who did that while the CCP hid, so it was Taiwan that won over the Japanese, not mainland China." When Imperial Japanese invaded Manchuria in 1931, Chiang kai-shek was reluctant to fight the Japanese, instead he continued purging communists (our own fellow Chinese) instead of meeting the invaders head on, until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap Chiang and get him to ally with the communists against the Japanese. This incident was later known as the Xi'an Incident (西安事变) Many young officers in the Northeast Army demanded Chiang be killed, but it was actually thanks to communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai and Lin Boqu, who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release and get him to promise to ally with the communists against the Japanese invaders.
    1
  25112.  @-JustHuman-  I'm still waiting for you to prove that those bodies in those crematoriums died because of Covid19, all you got is math and speculation, but nothing concrete to prove that China lied about the death count. I've already stated that Wuhan was under lockdown, so shipments and deliveries were delayed, backlogs were accumulated and that's one possible explanation why there was a surge in crematorium operations afterwards. So you mock all those Chinese workers for building 1000-bed temporary hospitals in record 10 days? In New York city, they just erected tents in Central Park to serve as additional beds youtu.be/njyFCyP-AZM
    1
  25113.  @-JustHuman-  It wasn't the communists that kidnap Chiang it was his own Nationalist KMT subordinates that did so. Chiang kai-Shek even served in the Japanese Army from 1909 to 1911. He purged communists from KMT and their removal of Communists from within the ranks allowed him free reign to give himself what amounted to dictatorial power over much of China. When the Japanese invaded Manchuria, Chiang refused to face the Japanese invaders, until two of his subordinates, Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, had to kidnap him to get him to ally with the communists in a united front against the Japanese. (Xi'an Incident) Additionally, the Communists actually saved his leadership, and it’s often forgotten that without the Communists’ help, Chiang would never have survived as a political force, since was the communists who convinced the officers to release Chiang and allow him to take control of the government once again. Chiang’s efforts against the Japanese gained him some influential friends. And although the Communist General Mao was responsible for much of the damage inflicted upon the Japanese, it was Chiang who got the credit mainly from Britain and the US. When civil war broke out in China, Chiang expected help from the allies, but after a long campaign against both the Japanese and the Germans, the US and Britain were reluctant to get involved in a civil war. His Western ‘friends’ literally abandoned him. He suppressed local culture in Taiwan (White Terror) and was responsible for the imprisonment of 140,000 Taiwanese. These people were taken captive for their alleged opposition to the KMT. At this time, anyone openly criticizing the ruling party was deemed a Communist sympathizer. He held the Taiwan presidency for 25 years. He held the Taiwan under a permanent state of martial law, thus ensuring his power was absolute. In fact, the constitution only allowed for two terms in power, but with martial law as his excuse, Chiang could rule indefinitely. Source: 11 Things You Should Know About Chiang Kai-shek (Culture Trip) Link＞theculturetrip.com/asia/taiwan/articles/11-things-know-chiang-kai-shek/
    1
  25114.  @-JustHuman-  You said: "Hopefully people will raise up and break free from the CCP, the Chinese people don't deserve to be treated this horrible." Why do you want Chinese people to rise up and overthrow our established government? The collapse of the Communist Party of China would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you wish for such a catastrophic event to happen to China?
    1
  25115.  @-JustHuman-  I'm not the one claiming China's death count "is totally a lie, as just in Wuhan the count was higher. As we can see with the crematoriums running 24/7, and the trucks when they came in with the urns for the families." those are your words, and you lack concrete evidence that those bodies being cremated are actual victims of Covid-19. You said you saw videos of the trucks with the urns, but one possible explanation is that the urns are waiting for pickup by the family members/relatives of the deceased, but because Wuhan was under lockdown, so the family members are unable to pick them up at the moment, so the trucks are delivering the urns to the households. Transportation has to be in bulk in order to be cheap, but it doesn't necessarily mean that there was a huge volume of cremation operations. What I'm saying is that just because according to your math, they delivered over 36,000 urns, it could be that some of these urns were around for weeks or months earlier, having accumulated to the point when it becomes more feasible to transport these urns in bulk. ... You said: "How could China have a less death told than countries with less than 10 million people, not just in the epicentre for the virus Wuhan, but in the whole country together ?" Because of strict (but effective) government policies, and responsible people willing to follow instructions passed down to them, rather than constantly protest lockdowns (like what is happening in many Western countries). The protests against lockdowns in the West serve as Covid19 spreading events that make Covid19 more difficult to control in the West. Another possible explanation is that maybe, just maybe, China isn't the original epicenter for Covid19, it was merely the place where Covid19 was detected and made aware to the public, and that it was circulating in the Western countries earlier than they reported. We've seen reports by Italy that Covid19 was possibly circulating in Milan since Sept 2019, before the Dec 2019 outbreak in Wuhan. Source: Coronavirus emerged in Italy earlier than thought, study shows cnbc.com/2020/11/15/coronavirus-emerged-in-italy-earlier-than-thought-study-shows.html ... You said: "No, I mock the CCP." You literally mocked Chinese workers completing our temporary hospitals in record time, and you mock their construction as low quality when you said: "China is know for its quick building, and bad quality that is where we get the Tofu Dreg from."
    1
  25116.  @-JustHuman-  So why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule the mainland. I mean, the Nationalist KMT held all the good cards, yet they virtually lost everything and had to flee the mainland in the end.
    1
  25117.  @-JustHuman-  There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, only detected in China. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy Link＞techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm ... Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-graft campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign, but after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption. And you were clearly mocking Chinese workers for bad quality buildings, why pretend that you're only anti-CPC when the truth is that you're anti-China? I mean, you're literally advocating for Chinese people to rise up and overthrow our government, but the CPC's collapse would plunge China into chaos and civil strife, wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country, so why do you wish for such a catastrophic event to happen to China?
    1
  25118.  @-JustHuman-  Earlier you said: "They could have a country that was much better, just look at Taiwan or Hong Kong (Before the CCP invaded it) and how well they're doing compared to the mainland." Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: Wikipedia: White Terror (Taiwan) But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Source: Wikipedia: Taiwan Miracle Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Taiwan's economy has since stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising, and Taiwan graduates are seeking employment opportunities outside of the island, in places like mainland China or Singapore. …… As for Hong Kong, Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain and not fully returned. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  25119.  @-JustHuman-  Previously before the 1997 handover, Hong Kong was under authoritarian rule of colonial Britain, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held in Hong Kong while it was a British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong's 1997 handover back to mainland China, that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favorite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony? You said: "Here I thought you where a higher tier wumao, can't you sent me back to one of the others, they where more fun to mess with ?" All this wumao labeling is your own imagination that's all. The fact that you can't refute my points on why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan, shows that you don't want to reason logically that's all, you use wumao as a means of insulting me, just because my views happen to differ from yours.
    1
  25120.  @-JustHuman-  Earlier you said: "just look at Taiwan or Hong Kong (Before the CCP invaded it) and how well they're doing compared to the mainland." China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    1
  25121.  @-JustHuman-  Because mainland China has the world's largest population at 1.4 billion people compared to Taiwan and Hong Kong. So if you divide our world's 2nd largest GDP by our enormous population, then of course you arrive at a GDP per capita lower than in Taiwan or Hong Kong. Take India (world's largest democracy) for example and their GDP per capita is lower than even China's, despite India being a Western brand of democracy. China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank has commanded healthy respect from international observers, as its performance parameters are equal to many top Western designs (like the Russian T-90 and the US M1 Abrams), and the Type 99 also packs a few unique tricks of its own. Source: National Interest: China's Deadly Type 99 Tank vs. Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams The Chinese government is pouring funds into research and development, and China already has world's 2nd highest R&D spending after the USA: Countries by Research and Development spending 1. United States ($612.714 billion) 2. China ($514.798 billion) 3. India ($231.500 billion) 4. Japan ($172.614 billion) 5. Germany ($131.932 billion) 6. South Korea ($100.055 billion) 7. France ($63.658 billion) 8. United Kingdom ($51.702 billion) ... Source: List of countries by research and development spending wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending#List In the West, researchers often have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products.
    1
  25122.  @-JustHuman-  "神州 Shenzhou So you admit GDP per capita means Chinese people are poor, than even Taiwan, at least we got that far." I'm saying that mainland China has more people to lift out of poverty than Taiwan, that's all. If Taiwan's political system was able to lift mainland Chinese population out of poverty, then it would be impressive. But the Nationalist KMT couldn't even defeat a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, heavily outnumbered, starving Communist peasants during the Chinese Civil War, and they lost the mainland and had to flee to Taiwan. Chiang kai-shek even transferred the mainland gold reserves from Shanghai to Taipei, leaving the mainland dirt-poor and in ruins after the war. ... You said: "So Taiwan is a better country to live in as a person than China, as you will be richer by a lot and lead a better life in generel there than in China." Not necessarily, because the cost of living in Taiwan is (generally) higher than in mainland China. In Taiwan, you pay more for food, clothing, rent, transport and other daily expenses, compared to the mainland, and job opportunities are fewer in Taiwan than in the mainland. Taiwan's economy is stagnate, wages are stagnate, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising, and many Taiwan graduates are seeking job opportunities in the mainland. ... About the People's Liberation Army, the China's Type 99 or ZTZ-99 is 3rd generation battle tank that is ranked among the World's Top 10 Main Battle Tanks, with advanced features including: -a fully stabilised smoothbore gun with autoloader, capable of firing anti-tank sniper missiles, and speculated to be able to penetrate the armour of the US M1 Abrams at close range with tungsten rounds. -Composite armour hull with front portion and turret protected by explosive reactive armour that resist enemy shell penetration. -A multi-layered radar system that detects and denotates incoming enemy missiles before impact. -A laser warning receiver that warns the tank commander that the tank is being painted by hostile lasers. Source: China showcases Type 99 Battle Tank youtu.be/ktniek01Xyw Source: Top 10 Most Powerful Tanks youtu.be/M3n6q_dTjfk?t=385 And its up there with the fastest to boot, equipped with turbo-charged engine providing a maximum road speed of 50 mph (80 kph).
    1
  25123.  @-JustHuman-  Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: MBA Skool: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 But where are the famous companies from Taiwan or Hong Kong to compare with the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  25124.  @-JustHuman-  You said: "神州 Shenzhou They could have done that yes, with their system where most of the money don't go into the pockets of the party members." The Nationalist Kuomintang was heavily corrupt, having pocketed some $750,000,000 worth of US military aid given to them, so much such that even then U.S President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption, and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves" ... Let's take the Japanese soldiers out of the picture then. After the Japanese surrendered at the end of WWII, the Communists had a strength of 1,200,000 (July 1945) whereas the Nationalist KMT had a strength of 2,000,000 (June 1946) so how were the communists not outnumbered? And mind you, this was after the Japanese surrendered in 1945, so there was no more fighting the Japanese, yet the KMT still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communists peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists' right to rule the mainland. .... And what makes you think Chinese culture is destroyed? China has many historical monuments like The Great Wall of China, Forbidden City, Qin Emperor Tomb, Terracotta Army, The Grand Canal (world's oldest and longest artificial river) and many more historical sites. Here's some videos of Chinese historical monuments. Video: The Great Wall of China in 4k - DJI Phantom 4 youtu.be/EotbKqZmBuY?t=20 Video: Forbidden City, Beijing, China in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/R9vcSWb6mug Video: Terracotta Army, Xian, China in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/VhIouznYlvo
    1
  25125.  @-JustHuman-  Besides our Type-99 ranking in world's Top 10 Main Battle Tanks, China also have advanced artillery, like the PLZ-05 (PLZ-52) self-propelled howitzer that is ranked among the Top 5 Self-propelled Howitzers in the world. Video: Top 10 Self Propelled Howitzers in the world 2017-2020 youtu.be/AQBcIRwg2fg?t=474 The PLZ-05 is capable of firing a full range of Chinese 155 munitions and having maximum range of fire of 30km (with standard projectiles) and 39km (with rocket-assisted projectiles) the PLZ-05 armour protects against small arms fire and artillery shell splinters. Maximum rate of fire is about 8-10 rounds per minute and on board ammunition supply is about 30 rounds. Powered with 8V51-Cooled Turbocharged Diesel, it can produce an output of 800 horsepower with a maximum road speed of 55 kmph and can achieve a maximum cruising range of 550 km. Video: 10 Most Powerful Howitzer in the World (2019) | Most Effective Tracked Artillery Systems youtu.be/V4UpNJi0HeY?t=360 .... About Chinese smartphone companies, apart Huawei, even Xiaomi was started in 2010. Today it's one of the world's most popular smartphones. In India, it's number one. Video: How Xiaomi broke out of China to go global | CNBC Reports youtu.be/291DlKa7iIU Besides smartphones, Chinese companies also dominate the civilian drone industry and Chinese company DJI is world's largest civilian drone-maker according to the following source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Power Vision (Chinese) 4. 3dr (American) 5. Yuneec (Chinese) 6. EHang (Chinese) 7. Walkera (Chinese) 8. Syma (Chinese) 9. Autel Robotics (American) 10. Blade (French) 11. Hubsan (Chinese) 12. UDIRC (Chinese) ... Source: Top Consumer Drone Companies 2019 top10drone.com/top-drone-companies/ But where are the famous companies from Taiwan compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  25126.  @-JustHuman-  Why are you talking about corruption in Taiwan and mainland China now as opposed to back during the Chinese Civil War? During the Chinese Civil War, and the KMT was heavily corrupt pocketed some $750,000,000 worth of US military aid given to them, so much such that even then U.S President Harry Truman made a remark about KMT corruption, and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves" After Roosevelt's death in 1945, the Chiangs found President Truman less sympathetic on a personal level, and unwilling to bankroll the struggle against Mao Tse-tung's Communist forces which the Nationalists now looked unlikely to win. There were suspicions that vast sums of American aid already provided to Chiang's government had been corruptly diverted. Truman himself was caustic on the subject in later years: "They're all thieves," he told an interviewer, "every damn one of them. They stole 750 million out of the [$3.8] billions that we sent to Chiang. They stole it, and it's invested in real estate down in Sao Paulo and some right here in New York." To make matters worse, Chinese interests backed Truman's Republican opponent, Governor Thomas Dewey, in the 1948 presidential election. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/3320987/Madame-Chiang-Kai-Shek.html So according to you the communists had 1.2 million troops, backed with additional militia of 2 million, totalling 3.2 million troops, but the Nationalist KMT had 2 million (regular) as well as 2.3 million (militia) (June 1946) totaling 4.3 million troops so clearly the Communists were outnumbered by the Nationalist KMT. Yet despite their initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped starving communist peasants and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? You said: "The CCP continued to make the irresistible promise in the countryside to the massive number of landless and starving peasants that by fighting for the CCP they would be given their own land to grow crops once the victory was won." So the Communists were able to mobilize the poor landless and starving peasants in the countryside, then doesn't this represent strong leadership on the part of the Communists? Why didn't Nationalist KMT woo the poor people in the countryside? Answer: because the KMT were landlords who taxed the peasants and left them starving in the countryside, that's why. You said: "The CCP din't have the know how to use tanks, or how to build them." That's why the communists were mostly dirt-poor peasants who were ill-equipped, while the KMT had US monetary support as well as tanks, yet the KMT still lost to bunch of dirt-poor, starving peasants who were unable to use tanks? This demonstrates the KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland while cementing the communist's right to rule the mainland. You said: "Not to mention the KMT had to deal with the loses, the wounded and the prisoners after they defeated the Japanese." The KMT only care about their own losses in the urban areas, what do they care about the dirt-poor, starving peasants in the countryside? In fact, it was left up to the communists to protect the rural countryside while the KMT protected the landlord's selfish interests. You said: "And the evil bastard Mao even knew they couldn't have won over the Chines forces, if the Japanese hadn't wore them down for them, and made the people suffer and lose land." That's effective strategy employed by Chairman Mao, the KMT forces cared nothing for the poor peasants, they only cared about protecting the rich landlords interests (as well as foreign interests). After Chairman Mao proclaimed the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949, the communists seized the lands from the rich corrupt landlords and redistributed them among the dirt-poor peasants, who finally owned their own land for the first time in centuries. Since peasants made up the majority of China at that time, that means more people in China received land, than the rich corrupt landlords. You said: "And the CCP do destroy the Chinese culture. That is the idea behind The Four Olds." Which of the Four Olds in China were destroyed? Chinese celebrate many historical festivals such as Spring Festival (Chinese New Year), Lantern Festival, Qingming (Grave Sweeping) Festival, Dragonboat Festival, Double Seventh (Chinese Valentine's Day) Festival, Mid-Autumn Festival, and so on. Here's some video of Chinese festivals in China. Video: Dragon Boat Races Celebrate China's Ancient Past | National Geographic youtu.be/YlPExNPyPwQ Video: The Chinese Lantern Festival youtu.be/xrhHvbHLbMc So what makes you think Chinese culture is destroyed? Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? The 1000-year old Fu Yun Temple in Shaanxi is simply in the process of renovation. Built originally in the Tang dynasty (618-907). Between 2002 and 2011, it was renovated and expanded to over 2,000 square meters (more than 21,000 square feet) at the cost of more than 20 million RMB (over $ 2.9 million), now it's merely undergoing the next stage of renovation that's all.
    1
  25127.  @-JustHuman-  Besides our Type-99 tank and our PLZ-05 self-propelled howitzer, the People's Liberation Army also has Multi Launch Rocket Systems (MLRS) like the SR-5, the AR3 and the WS-2D which rank among the World's Top 10 MLRSs according to the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66ETMGNrh98&t=756s
    1
  25128.  @-JustHuman-  As for famous Chinese tech companies, apart from dominating smartphones and drones, China has produced many successful Internet companies like JD, Tencent, Alibaba, Suning, Bytedance (Tik Tok), Meituan-Dianping, Baidu, NetEase, Kwai, Pindoudou, Trip Dotcom, Sina Corp, and so on. Source: Wikipedia: List of largest Internet companies But where are the famous companies from Taiwan and Hong Kong to compare with the mainland ? How can Taiwan and Hong Kong possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  25129.  @-JustHuman-  Why should we do as Hong Kong? Look at prosperous Shenzhen in the mainland, just across from Hong Kong and Shenzhen’s economic growth surpassed Hong Kong's in 2017. Source: SCMP: Shenzhen surpasses US$338 billion GDP mark in 2017, beats Hong Kong and Singapore’s growth Shenzhen is roughly the same economic size as Singapore and Hong Kong, but recorded nominal output of 2.2 trillion yuan (US$338 billion) in 2017 thanks to its booming hi-tech sector. Over 40% of the output came from “innovative” businesses such as internet, biotech and telecom. And that's despite Shenzhen being under communist party rule, while Hong Kong is suffering under its own democratic government. Then why should mainland China follow Hong Kong when our leadership is actually better? You said: "China will never be a leader in semi conductors" Why not? Maybe not right now, but China is investing heavily into semiconductors. Chinese semiconductor firms have continued to attract high levels of investment so far this year, sealing billions of dollars in financing as Beijing looks to build up its industry to meet demand created by a global shortage and lessen its reliance on foreign products. Some 164 Chinese firms received 40 billion yuan ($6.19 billion) in combined funding during the first five months of 2021, according to a report published last week by U.S.-based law firm Katten and Chinese chip-industry monitor Ijiwei. Source: China's chip investment moves ahead at full throttle https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Caixin/China-s-chip-investment-moves-ahead-at-full-throttle You said: "We as a world should do our best to fight the dictators of China, before they kill more people or start a war just to save face." China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  25130.  @-JustHuman-  You said: "You know you can post all the replies in one post, I know you payed per post, but it's just better to read in one go." YouTube sometimes delete comments that are way too long, so I prefer to divide my posts if possible. And who do I payed per post? Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree, but at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-graft campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But how has KMT outgrown its corruption you tell me? According to Wikipedia: Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had 2 million (regular) and 2.3 million (militia) (June 1946) totalling 4.3 million so how were the KMT outnumbered when the Communists totalled was 3.8 million? You claimed that the KMT was tired, well the Communists survived near-extinction by the KMT, through the use of tactical retreats like the "Long March" (长征) against overwhelming KMT odds of 300,000 vs 69,000 (October 1934). By the end of the march, communist forces been reduced to 7,000 (October 1935) just 10% of it's original strength. The KMT didn't care about the peasantry at all, they only cared about the rich landlords. During the Sino-Japanese war, the KMT protected the urban areas and it was up to the communists to defend the peasants in the countryside (which is a lot more area to cover, despite communists lesser numbers). And like I said earlier, the KMT received lots of US military aid, but instead of spending the money defending China, the KMT choose to pocket some $750,000,000 worth of U.S military aid, so much until President Truman made the remark that "The Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs [were] all thieves." What did the KMT do for China by pocketing this 750 million in US military aid? Again it was Chairman Mao Zedong and the communists that seized the lands from the corrupt landlords and redistributed it to the dirt-poor peasants. For the first time, many peasants are no longer shackled by crippling debt due to taxes by the corrupt landlords and now the peasants own land for themselves. What did the Nationalist KMT do for the peasantry? Even during KMT rule during Republic of China period (1912-1949) there were numerous famines across China, such as the 1920–1921 North China Famine, 1928–1930 Northern China Famine, 1936–1937 Sichuan-Gansu Famine, 1942–1943 Henan Famine, and so on. All these famines in China occurred during Republic of China period under Nationalist KMT administration, so what makes you think KMT policies did not result in famine? You said: "like KMT tank crews joining the CCP to avoid getting killed." Explain why would KMT tank crews (with their tanks) be afraid of getting killed by a bunch of dirt-poor communist peasants that don't have tanks of their own? It's clearly due to sheer KMT incompetence and corruption that KMT tank crews began switching sides to the communists who are fighting for the people of China, not the Chiang kai-shek and the KMT who fought for themselves and the rich corrupt landlords. I've already stated above the numerous famines in China under KMT rule during Republic of China, so what makes you think KMT won't have resulted in famines given their history? So which of the Four Olds were destroyed you tell me? Chinese celebrate many historical festivals such as Spring Festival (Chinese New Year), Lantern Festival, Qingming (Grave Sweeping) Festival, Dragonboat Festival, Double Seventh (Chinese Valentines Day) Festival, Mid-autumn Festival, and so on. Here's some video of Chinese festivals in China. Video: Dragon Boat Races Celebrate China's Ancient Past | National Geographic youtu.be/YlPExNPyPwQ Video: Lantern Festival celebrated across China youtu.be/XnXzQ-p-DpY Video: How modern Chinese celebrate the Qingming Festival youtu.be/mFGYrPNXaLg
    1
  25131.  @-JustHuman-  You said: "It's always easy to look back, what you need is people that can look forward, and the CCP can't do that as we have seen." What makes you think China can't look forward? China has put forth numerous 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the president term limits, our leaders can remain in power long enough to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long-term leadership. Whereas in the USA for example, the US presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so US presidents can only make short-term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US's short-term leadership. Besides Chinese tanks, howitzers and MLRSs, China also has amphibious assault vehicles like the VN-18 that's the world's fastest amphibious assault vehicle, able to attain a sail speed of 30km/h, the fastest of it's kind. The tracks and wheels can lift up into the body to reduce traction. The max ground speed is 65km/h with a cannon, a machinegun and 14 people on board. Its engine can produce 1600 horsepower, a number usually associated with heavy tanks. Video: Chinese firm built 'fastest' amphibious assault vehicle youtu.be/4rzoWPWbai8 Mainland China has also produced numerous successful companies, such as: Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, ZTE, Lenovo, DJI, Alibaba, Tencent, Bytedance (TikTok), etc. And why is being proud of Tiktok isn't really something either? TikTok was the most downloaded non-gaming app worldwide for June 2021 with more than 65 million installs, so what's wrong with being proud of TikTok? Source: TikTok Holds its Lead as the Most Downloaded App Once Again in June https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/tiktok-holds-its-lead-as-the-most-downloaded-app-once-again-in-june/603068/ Even in banking, China has produced many of the world's largest banks including China Construction Bank, AgBank, ICBC, Bank of China, Postal Savings Bank of China, Bank of Communications, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank (China), China Minsheng Bank, Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, China CITIC Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Huaxia Bank, Bank of Beijing, China Guangfa Bank, Bank of Shanghai, Bank of Jiangsu, China Zheshang Bank and so on. Source: Wikipedia: List of Largest Banks But where are the famous companies from Taiwan and Hong Kong as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan and Hong Kong possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  25132.  @fungsuimaster  "Stop being disingenuous..." Could you elaborate which part of my post is being ingenuous?
    1
  25133.  @fungsuimaster  Sorry my keyboard has autocorrect enabled. Which part of my post is being disingenuous?
    1
  25134.  @starpeople134  Chinese fishermen been fishing in those seas for millenia, why should our fishermen cease fishing activities in our territorial waters?
    1
  25135.  @starpeople134  So if you're Germany then what has China fishing in our territorial waters even got to do with you? China was never part of Germany, what are you talking about? If you just want China to burn that's all, then you're a China hater who wants to wipe out 1.4 billion people off the planet.
    1
  25136. @HKZ P If the journalist broke Chinese laws, then why can't we punish them under our laws? I mean, didn't US President Trump stand with Saudi Arabia and defended the Saudi Arabian Crown Prince from murder of journalist? He said the journalist Khashoggi was an enemy of the state after all.
    1
  25137.  @XykuJoxa  How are Chinese people slaves? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play (as long as they behave themselves) Haven't you seen Chinese tourists visiting your lands, buying souvenirs and stimulating your economies? Your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with international exchange students from China, studying the same topics as their peers. In global research institutions, Chinese scientists are collaborating with foreign companies in joint R&D projects. And Chinese investors are buying up property in other countries to develop them. So is that why Westerners very sad? Because China is growing stronger every day and our people are virtually everywhere? We do make up 20% of the world's population after all!
    1
  25138.  @fairhall001  Chairman Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of the Great Chinese Famine, caused by bad weather conditions like floods, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong can't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    1
  25139.  @jont2576  The Yellow Peril mindset primarily applies to the West not South East Asia, and since you're a Chinese in SE Asia, the Yellow Peril mindset also labels you, since it depicts the peoples of East and Southeast Asia as an existential danger to the Western world. (Source: Wikipedia: Yellow Peril). Also, I find your mindset strange, that your ancestors left mainland China to settle in SE Asia, yet you fear when PRC mainlanders do the same that your ancestors did?
    1
  25140.  @jont2576  The Yellow Peril mindset primarily applies to the West not South East Asia, and since you're a Chinese in SE Asia, the Yellow Peril mindset also labels you, since it depicts the peoples of East and Southeast Asia as an existential danger to the Western world. (Source: Wikipedia: Yellow Peril).
    1
  25141.  @namelesssnitchy  Take ancient writing scripts for example and Chinese characters constitute the oldest continuously used system of writing in the world, having been used since 1200 BCE and today, Mandarin Chinese is the most spoken language in the world by number of speakers. Whereas other ancient scripts like Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia) Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered dead languages today, since they are no longer evolving with the times and no new words being added into their vocabulary. Source: Wikipedia:Chinese characters
    1
  25142.  @namelesssnitchy  Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    1
  25143.  @namelesssnitchy  How many people have died at the hands of capitalism?
    1
  25144.  @namelesssnitchy  In 1958, the Yellow River flooded which coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. In July 1958, the peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 m3/s (790,000 cu ft/s) with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kg/m3 (57 lb/cu ft), 14× and 24× their mean annual values, respectively. The flood water level was so high that it rose up to the top of the levee in several places. This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. It was reported as the most severe flood since 1933. ... Source: Wikipedia:1958 Yellow River flood ... So how can you claim that bad weather conditions weren't involved?
    1
  25145. Capitalism is killing the planet, it's the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."
    1
  25146. In China, government controls corporations. In USA, government IS controlled by the corporations.
    1
  25147. So if you're saying Philippines supports Taiwan's claim to the 11 Dash Line which is more territory in the South China Sea than even mainland China's 9 Dash Line?
    1
  25148.  @theamalgamatedtheory  The most recent reports indicate that the siege at the Azovstal steel plant in Mariupol has finally ended in the surrender of the Azov Battalion (Western MSM called it "evacuation"). The Azov are arguably Ukraine's best trained military, and its surrender in Mariupol strikes a severe blow to Ukrainian morale, if their best men can be taken out just like that.
    1
  25149. Agreed. Not just America, but even in Europe, the Western Democratic institutions are crumbling, and Western politicians aren't able to deliver what the People want.
    1
  25150.  @michaelkatz275  Western governments are unable to deliver what the ordinary people want, can this truly be called democracy?
    1
  25151.  @michaelkatz275  Yes. Especially Gordan Chang, author of the book The Coming Collapse of China, published in 2001 and it's already 2022 and China still hasn't collapsed despite his prediction. Yet why do Western readers continue to believe in China's collapse? China is still going to be around and it's better if Western readers learn to accept this fact.
    1
  25152.  @michaelkatz275  Russians have plenty of gas to warm their homes this coming winter. It's Europe that's going to freeze this winter with Germany introducing energy rationing, streetlamps going dark in many parts of Europe, and encouraging people to take shorter hot baths during winter. All while European governments continue to send money to one of the most corrupt countries in Europe, Ukraine, who isn't even a member of NATO for crying out loud.
    1
  25153. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25154. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25155. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  25156. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25157. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25158.  @williamplayfair364  I read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and while Peng Shuai was emotional and had a tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, spanning several years in fact, there are no allegations of sexual assault in her post. She even wrote in her post that the sex was consensual. Peng Shuai wrote: Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well. So according to Peng Shuai's post, she consented to sex so it turns out that the allegations of sexual assault made by WTA are not true after all.
    1
  25159.  @bobleponge1853  Australia is arguably the hub of anti-China sentiment in the West. Have you actually read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit)? There are no allegations of sexual assault in her post, and she even consented to sex. Peng wrote: Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well. On February 7, 2022, Peng participated in an interview with French sports newspaper LEquipe. Where she said there had been a huge misunderstanding surrounding her accusation of Zhang, her disappearance from the Chinese internet, and her well-being, reiterating "I never said anyone sexually assaulted me". Peng also said the Weibo post resulted in an enormous misunderstanding from the outside world. Her wish is that the meaning of this post no longer be skewed and that she erased it. It's her private life and she has expressed her desire for privacy, but Western media would have none of that and they are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see.
    1
  25160.  @jp95js  Why do you seem to think violence is the way to resolve conflicts? What does physical violence help to resolve, instead of people can talk things over like adults? Cyrus is merely bringing up China's positive achievements, then he isn't breaking the law by doing so in Canada or the USA. And I don't understand what's your definition of "fair fights", look at 76-year old Chinese Granny getting attacked because she's Chinese. Or 83-year old Vietnamese man getting a broken nose and possible neck fracture, just because he's Asian. Video: Chinese granny punched in the face in US, as Congress holds hearing on Asian hate crimes youtu.be/VHFzn7krZkM Yet you somehow think then when it comes to physical violence, your people fight fair?
    1
  25161.  @jp95js  All I'm asking, is that you claimed to have seen a video on YouTube of "some silly White Foreigner" who got attacked in a bar by a crowd of Chinese, all I'm asking is for that link to that video. Because you've claimed it was SerpentZA vid, then an ADV podcast, and now it came off WeChat? Why not just show me the video that you saw where a Caucasian got beaten up in a bar by a crowd of Chinese?
    1
  25162.  @joekeegan-yc4nm  Ton is a measurement of weight. CO2 is 3.67 times heavier than carbon. Coal (specifically bituminous coal) has an average carbon content of 66%. Since 66% of 1 kg is 660 g, there are about 660 g of carbon atoms in 1 kilo of bituminous coal. Multiplying 660 by 3.67 gives us 2420. Therefore, burning 1 kg of bituminous coal will produce 2.42 kg of carbon dioxide. It's a one-to-two ratio. Hence 100 million tons of CO2 is produced from burning 50 million tons of coal.
    1
  25163.  @donreeves60  "Your mathematics must have been used by Boeing when they designed the space ship currently marooned in space." What has Boeing's space ship even got to do with my calculations that burning 1 kg of coal produces around 2 kg of CO2?
    1
  25164.  @miroslawkaras7710  Which flood are you referring to? China says that the Mekong dam did not discharge water downstream amid heavy flooding in Thailand.
    1
  25165.  @x-man5056  "Liars math. Pure BS." How much CO2 is produced by 1 ton of coal? Atomic weights: carbon - 12, oxygen - 16, carbon dioxide - 44. 1 ton of carbon will produce 44/12 or 3.67 tons of carbon dioxide. But the carbon content of coal varies with it being ~60% for lignite and ~80% for anthracite. So 1 tonne of coal will produce from ~2.2 to ~2.9 tonnes of carbon dioxide.
    1
  25166.  @tobiasrekker5376  "Shenzhou. I'm not sure the figures are correct. What are your sources," According to Stanford University, the energy from Three Gorges Dam is able to replace around 50 million tons of coal that otherwise would have been burned.
    1
  25167.  @araara4746  "Which one produces 100 million tons of CO2 annually, the Three Gorges Dam or burning coal?" Clearly, the Three Gorges Dam doesn't produce CO2, so this question is a no-brainer.
    1
  25168.  @joekeegan-yc4nm  "If I add a kilogram of water to a kilogram of features, do I now have two kilograms of feathers?" Water and feathers do not react. However, the chemical equation for burning coal is C + O2 → CO2. Carbon has gone from being just C to now having O2 attached to it, in the form of CO2. So on the molecular/atomic level, the CO2 will be heavier than C alone.
    1
  25169. 老实说翻墙之后就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  25170. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  25171. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  25172.  @buymecola1  "Shenzhou. Please Mr. Wumao, China never showed up at the UN." China is a permanent member of the United Nations, who said China never showed up at the UN? What are you talking about?
    1
  25173. ​ @MH-il1lk  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  25174.  @sreedharanaidu3175  According to National Library of Medicine: Tibet's Population: Past and Present -Tibet's population increased to about 1 million in 1951. -Population increased from 1.15 million to about 1.23 million during 1952-59. -Population during 1960-69 increased from 1.23 million to 1.48 million. -Population increased from 1.48 million to 1.83 million during 1970-79. ... In 2019, the population of Tibet is 3.506 million. If you claim my stats are wrong, what are your proposed statistics for Tibet's population?
    1
  25175. Kishore is knowledgeable about ASEAN region, China and the US's preconceived views towards China. But other regions of the world like Russia and Ukraine, as well as Gaza and the Middle East, he tends to follow the Singapore perspective (which follows the Western perspective). Just look at Singaporean media Channel News Asia (CNA).
    1
  25176.  @fakruk  Mandarin Chinese happens to be the world's most spoken language by number of speakers after all.
    1
  25177.  David Leija  Do you have actual evidence that Chinese hack thee most? How do you trace the hackers back to their origin country?
    1
  25178. Canada and Mexico had believed themselves safe from American tariffs and boy were they caught off-guard. Meanwhile, China has been preparing for additional tariffs since the trade war started during Trump's first term.
    1
  25179.  @coripatoreo  I watched his videos and serpentza clearly doesn't love China or Chinese people despite claiming to. He lived in China for 15 years, yet he never seems to regard China as his home, nor Chinese as his fellow countrymen, he always regard China as a strange foreign land, filled with people completely different from himself. serpentza's Mandarin proficiency sucks, and you can't hold proper conversations with serpentza on every day topics that Chinese find interesting, because his vocabulary is only that of an 8-year old. It's not just China, serpentza hardly seems to mention his homeland of South Africa, it's like he clearly doesn't fit in his homeland, nor China. He claims he loves China and Chinese people, but its just hollow words coming out of his mouth, and he doesn't really mean what he says.
    1
  25180.  user-ol3ru2kf1c  Did I ever mention anything about the Communist Party of China? Why then are you calling me a wumao?
    1
  25181. Niko Bellic The 14th Dalai Lama's government in exile (Central Tibetan Administration) is currently not recognised by any country in the world, including India where it is located.
    1
  25182. +Jeff Li You are not in China anymore, so what gives you the right to say "Tibet, Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia are not parts of China"? You no longer from China, and don't know true history of China, so what gives you the right decide what belongs to China and what doesn't? Who do you think you are here? According to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qing_dynasty -The Manchus identified their state as "China" (中國, Zhōngguó; "Middle Kingdom"), and the emperors equated the lands of the Qing state (including present-day Northeast China, Xinjiang, Mongolia, Tibet and other areas) as "China", defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that "China" only meant Han areas. The Qing emperors proclaimed that both Han and non-Han peoples were part of "China". -They used both "China" and "Qing" to refer to their state in official documents, international treaties and foreign affairs and both "Qing" and "China" terms were used interchangeably. So why you define China as "Han Chinese only" when China has over 50 ethnic groups? What do you really know about being Chinese, as to define whole China as Han Chinese only? 我已经给你面子了，你还不认错？证据明明在你面前，你还装眼瞎不看，那我还能做什么？
    1
  25183. Many Filipinos (but not all) tend to have the Colonial Mentality, worshiping Anglo-Saxon culture while harboring disdain for any non-white culture (including their own). Their minds need to be decolonized, only then will they emancipate from these mental chains.
    1
  25184. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  25185. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  25186. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  25187. +JuggernautHunter02 The Vietnamese Communists retain control of Vietnam when American pulled out, so it constituted a victory for Vietnam isn't it? Even support for war can be targeted as part of the means to winning a war.
    1
  25188. +Seastallion "The US almost never engages in total warfare, usually only limited warfare to achieve specific objectives" So what objectives did USA achieve in Vietnam War? You are sending US soldiers to die on foreign soil for another country's sake. Even in Middle East, you are sending US soldiers to die on foreign soil (for over 16 years) and for what? Do the Vietnamese and Iraqis, Afghanistan people, etc, respect America? In my opinion, US soldiers should only risk their lives to protect their homeland, America. US soldiers should only die in defense of their own country, not for some other country's sake. And the US mainland has not been in any danger ever since the Cuban Missile crisis, so why are American soldiers continuing to fight meaningless wars from across the Pacific Ocean?
    1
  25189. +David Loaza In warfare, if the defending country survives while the invading force retreats, the defenders are said to have won and the invaders have failed. I mean, ask any student about the US-Vietnam War and they will tell you US lost the war.
    1
  25190. +john poon It goes to show that Mao Zedong was not some god, but a leader who sacrificed his son for North Korea's sake. Even today, North Korea is still standing and supported thanks to Chinese sacrifice during Korean war, so who won the war?
    1
  25191. +Tomatenpresse "... as was the US, you think their equipment was up to date?" The PLA troops were poorly trained, had crappy weapons, overextended supply lines, non-existence air and naval support, and with only North Korean soldiers for allies. But South Korea had the combined might of USA, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Greece, France, Netherlands, + 10 other countries military. Their troops had better training, better equipment, better air and naval support...and yet, the armies of those 16 countries did not win? Against China and North Korea? Even if you say those countries only invested the bare minimum into the war effort, then why invest effort into the war at all, if you fail to win?
    1
  25192. +Tomatenpresse It's those 16 countries choice how much soldiers and equipment to sacrifice to a war that isn't even on their own turf (except for South Korea) At least, PLA soldiers died to protect our neighbor, and North Korean and South Korean troops died on Korean soil, but what about those US troops, UK troops, French troops, Canadian troops, etc, dying on foreign soil? Why send only the bare minimum force to fight a war halfway across the globe? And still not win? What do the deaths of those troops on foreign soil mean to your countries?
    1
  25193. "If they used brute force they would win." Then why didn't they use brute force? What's the point of sending minimum soldiers to die on foreign soil, if you fail to win the war? How to answer to those soldier's families that their sons/brothers/husbands died without achieving victory on foreign soil? Korean war is not the only war fought on foreign soil by USA. America also lost the Vietnam War too
    1
  25194. +Nigqueer Sumdouche In the end USA still lost the Vietnam War so why talk about kill ratio when you did not achieve victory? Haven't all those American soldiers dying on foreign soil been in vain? Whereas Vietnamese soldiers died on their own turf and their country remained free of US rule.
    1
  25195.  @GVK-jm9sg  Even today, 3 years after my first comment, the mighty U.S Army lost the 20-year Afghan War to a bunch of insurgents, after pouring trillions of dollars into the war effort, what makes you think the U.S is always better? U.S Army lost the Vietnam War to a bunch of starving, dirt-poor communist Vietnamese peasants, and neither did USA win the Korean War (it's a stalemate).
    1
  25196.  @colegill6368  And the United States just lost the 20-year Afghan War to a bunch of insurgents, even abandoning billions of dollars of U.S military equipment to the Taliban. The US lost the Vietnam War to a bunch of starving Communist Vietnamese peasants and neither did the US win the Korean War (it was a stalemate).
    1
  25197.  @outdoorsman1566  China is testing hypersonic glide vehicles that can travel up to Mach 10 (or 10 times the speed of sound) that can potentially bypass at anti-missile defenses. The U.S failed in they hypersonic vehicle testing.
    1
  25198.  @User73287  Why not attempt to refute my points instead of labelling me a Chinese bot？
    1
  25199.  @duquepak1971  The well-funded, mighty U.S Army still lost the Afghan War against a bunch of insurgents and had to withdraw in a shambolic fashion from Kabul. The U.S's democratic experiment failed in Afghanistan after spending nearly 20 years and pouring trillions of dollars into the Afghan war effort, and the democratic institutions installed in Afghanistan collapsed like a house of cards. The democratically elected Afghan President Ghani abandoned his post and fled the country with carloads of U.S cash from his corrupted regime. The 300,000 strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban in weeks with minimal resistance. If anything, this shows that democracy can't be forced onto countries, like what the USA did with Afghanistan. As for Taiwan, President Xi Jinping publicly stated that China's goal is to achieve peaceful reunification with Taiwan island, why should China exercise the military option when it's not necessary at the moment? Most major countries in the world recognise Taiwan as part of China, even recently the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua have switched recognition of Taipei to Beijing.
    1
  25200.  @duquepak1971  So the U.S just poured trillions of dollars into Afghanistan and wasted American taxpayer's money, leaving behind billions of dollars of U.S military equipment for the Taliban. Even the U.S drone strike that killed 10 innocent Afghan civilians (including women and children) and the U.S General responsible for ordering the attack can get away without major consequences for such a mistake. "and about taiwan, how is the People's Republic of China planning to accomplish the reunification?" It's no secret today that USA is in decline and China is rising. Many economists predict that China's economy is expected to surpass the United States someday in the foreseeable future. The main anti-reunification forces in Taiwan are from those who think they can still rely on the U.S for military support. However, once U.S declines to the point where they are no longer able to challenge mainland China on the Taiwan issue, then Taiwan will eventually be reunified with the mainland, once the opposing forces realizes USA is too weak and they can no longer count on the USA for support. Time is on mainland China's side, and patience is the key for Taiwan to be eventually reunified with the mainland. As long as peace prevails, China will eventually cross this dangerous threshold (possibly by 2025-2028) by then the USA would have declined to be unable to risk war with mainland China over Taiwan.
    1
  25201.  @dinesh50448  If India wants to cure or stop Covid-19, the government needs to enter lockdown in order to sacrifice businesses to save lives. China has demonstrated the success of lockdowns through Wuhan, India needs to do the same. However, the current Modi government is more interested in sacrificing lives to save businesses. His administration is like a ostrich burying its head in the ground. How to solve a problem, if the government fails to even recognise that there's a problem?
    1
  25202.  @dinesh50448  Where does India stand in this conflict? India is making the headlines for record number of Covid-19 cases and deaths, why don't India solve their own domestic problems first rather than point fingers at China?
    1
  25203.  @dinesh50448  I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  25204.  @dinesh50448  Here's a short 2-min vid of 11 Chinese cities in China. Video:youtu.be/mzR8Scsd33g
    1
  25205.  @dinesh50448  LOL, you are the one throwing mud on China, scolding China all the time, all the while ignoring India's problems, have you looked yourself in the mirror, while you say those words to me? Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  25206.  @dinesh50448  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours.
    1
  25207.  @dinesh50448  About GDP per Capita, it's because China is home to world's largest population so if you divide our GDP by our enormous population, then of course you arrive at a GDP per capita lower than the United States. Just look at India, (world's largest democracy) and India's GDP per capita is even lower than China's (despite China having a larger population than India). You're the one who said "but why can't the world be a better place by learning & adopting good things rather then scolding each other for problem they have" and yet here you are scolding China all the while ignoring India's problems. Why don't you heed your own advice?
    1
  25208.  @dinesh50448  "神州 Shenzhou China has to be ready for constructive criticism," Yeah, but so far you offered none, except for throwing mud on China while simultaneously praising India despite it's massive failures to deal with its own domestic problems.
    1
  25209.  @dinesh50448  China welcomes India on board the Belt and Road Initiative and join in mutual prosperity, but India rejected China's offer. Every YouTube video have so many Indians throwing mud on China all the time, so what constructive criticism is there?
    1
  25210.  @dinesh50448  Is there something wrong with China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson giving statements in Mandarin, the national language of China? The Indian PM Narendra Modi's speeches are in Hindi language, then can't China's MOFA give statements in Mandarin? It's the job of the interpreters all over the globe to translate whatever language spoken into languages understood by their local media, why are you seemingly blaming China MOFA spokesperson for speaking in Mandarin?
    1
  25211.  @dinesh50448  PM Modi hardly speaks English, he speaks mostly in Hindi probably because more Indians understand Hindi than English. And right now, Modi isn't even saying anything about the coronavirus ravaging India, yet majority of Indians continue to support him? There are no anti-Modi protests in India despite his catastrophic handling of Covid-19? Also, I disagree that China's spokesperson speaking English will somehow improve communication. As a spokesperson, she should speak in the language she's most comfortable and most fluent with, so that she can properly convey her message. If she's forced to speak in a language that she's not comfortable or fluent with, then the original meaning behind her message might be distorted or misinterpreted, grammatical errors and mistakes might alter the original meaning of her message. As a diplomatic spokesperson, the sending the wrong message can have severe consequences on global politics. If you speak with a language you are comfortable with, you have access to the full spectrum of expressiveness needed to communicate all manner of ideas. Rather than be restricted with a language that you are unfamiliar with, diminishing the value of expression behind your message. Therefore, it it still better for Chinese spokesperson to give her statements in Mandarin, left to the interpreters to translate the meaning behind the messages.
    1
  25212.  @dinesh50448  Why? Do you want China or Taiwan to suffer from a second wave? Why aren't you more worried about India is mishandling it's current wave?
    1
  25213.  @dinesh50448  I debated online with many Indians, many of them are frustrated with India not performing well under democracy. Yet many Indians always complain about China's political system, even though China has transformed from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into an economic juggernaut today, the world's factory (Made in China) a growing scientific and technological power, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. It's like when British colonised India, many Indians still hold on to the colonialised mindset, worshipping Westerners and blindly following their political system. Countries should chart their own path to success, rather than just blindly copying other countries political systems.
    1
  25214.  @dinesh50448  Listen to what? More destructive criticism on how China's political system is flourishing? If the Indians constantly treat China like the enemy, then should Chinese treat Indians like friends? Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  25215.  @dinesh50448  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  25216.  @dinesh50448  Did you know that the 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and a traitor to his people? The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government (Beijing). Declassified CIA files have exposed that a total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) Source: CIA Tibetan program wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Costs So here we have concrete evidence that the 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the USA to engage in separatist activities against the Central People's Government.
    1
  25217.  @btroy3768  I believe many of such people aren't even being paid to criticize China, especially some Indian netizens who vehemently hate China and resent the rise of China under the Communist Party, while India is actually suffering under their own Western brand of democracy.
    1
  25218.  @Poseidon99Jeus  You're saying that you can distinguish between whether someone is Chinese or Japanese based on physical appearance?
    1
  25219.  @Poseidon99Jeus  So a Chinese girl is only considered beautiful in your eyes when she contains those Japanese traits? How would you know for sure those traits are Japanese or Chinese?
    1
  25220.  @GooseGander  What's wrong with studying Chinese and speaking Mandarin?
    1
  25221.  @GooseGander  It kinda sounded like you look down on people who study Chinese. My bad.
    1
  25222.  @Cosmo1093  New York actually got most of their Covid-19 cases from Europe, not China. New research indicates that the coronavirus began to circulate in the New York area by mid-February, weeks before the first confirmed case, and that travelers brought in the virus mainly from Europe, not Asia. Source: Most New York Coronavirus Cases Came From Europe, Genomes Show nytimes.com/2020/04/08/science/new-york-coronavirus-cases-europe-genomes.html “The majority is clearly European,” said Harm van Bakel, a geneticist at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, who co-wrote a study awaiting peer review.
    1
  25223.  @Cosmo1093  When the outbreak occurred in Italy, none of its European neighbours bothered to help, its actually China that sent a planeload of medical supplies, including masks and respirators, to Italy to help it deal with its growing coronavirus crisis. A team of nine Chinese medical staff arrived in Italy with some 30 tonnes of equipment on a flight organized by the Chinese Red Cross. Source: China sends medical supplies, experts to help Italy battle coronavirus reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-italy-respirators-idUSKBN2101IM In contrast to China, Italy’s partners in the European Union earlier this month refused Rome’s requests for help with medical supplies as they looked to stockpile face masks and other equipment to help their own citizens.
    1
  25224. @Red Disaster Hey, Singapore recently jumped by 900 new cases, what's your government doing?
    1
  25225. @Red Disaster Singapore is in lockdown? I thought world nations praised Singapore’s handling of Covid-19, so what's there to praise?
    1
  25226.  @Cosmo1093  So it was actually an American man that brought the first coronavirus to USA? Then why did you accuse Chinese of bringing the virus to USA when it was their own Americans that brought the virus? You're just anti-China that's all. And Dr Peter Forster is only listing a possibility, because he has no actual proof at the moment.
    1
  25227.  @Cosmo1093  It should be noted that Dr Peter Forster's latest study has not been peer-reviewedg yet. If Type-A really came from Southern China then why is it there weren't any earlier reports of this infection in South China? Because Wuhan appears to be predominantly Type-B so it's likely that it didn't begun in Wuhan.
    1
  25228.  @Cosmo1093  China is donating medical supplies to other countries affected by Covid-19. Video: Jack Ma donates 500,000 coronavirus testing kits and 1,000,000 masks to the US youtu.be/t4it58bem6I Video: Chinese donate half a million masks to Italy to aid coronavirus fight youtu.be/tQQa7RUKXzs Video: Chinese donate 70,000 masks to Japan to aid coronavirus fight youtu.be/cYkYHauUmwo Video: 300,000 China-donated masks arrive in Belgium youtu.be/B0oxcoh9rDo
    1
  25229. @Red Disaster Singapore's political environment is stifling, why don't you criticise Singapore government then? According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore (Link: hrw.org/asia/singapore ) Singapore’s political environment is stifling. Citizens face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. In 2017, the country tightened the already strict limits on public assemblies contained in the Public Order Act, which requires police permits for any “cause-related” assembly outside the closely monitored “Speakers’ Corner.”
    1
  25230. @Red Disaster PM Lee Hsien Loong's authoritarian regime is reimposing a climate of fear similar to his father's after a brief dalliance with more openness. Source: No dissident thoughts allowed in Singapore asiatimes.com/2017/12/no-dissident-thoughts-allowed-singapore/ After months of investigations, Singapore police finally dropped a bombshell at the end of November: social worker and activist Jolovan Wham would be charged for organizing public assemblies without a permit, vandalism and refusing to sign police statements.
    1
  25231. @Red Disaster Why don't you Singapore worry about your 942 new infections? Criticise your own government handling and see what happens. Source: Daily high of 942 new COVID-19 cases reported in Singapore channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/covid-19-new-cases-singapore-942-apr-18-dormitories-12655240
    1
  25232.  @michaelkatz275  ZTE was the first victim of US striking an economic blow against China. Huawei was the 2nd victim of the US attempt to wound Chinese national pride.
    1
  25233. In the 19th Century, Britain was a colonial empire, but by the 20th century, the U.S overtook the collapsing British empire and the transition did not result in outright wars between the two. The same thing should happen in the 21st century with the rise of China and the decline of the U.S, but it's the West's inability to accept a non-western nation rising that's fueling the conflict.
    1
  25234. China's Three Gorges Dam generates 100 billion kWh of hydroelectricity, which is equivalent to burning 50 million tonnes of coal, producing 100 million tons of carbon dioxide and 2 million tons of sulfur dioxide annually.
    1
  25235. +X x After WWI (the war to end all wars) there should be no more wars but WWII happened. After Germany and Japan surrender, there should be no more wars, but USA and USSR had the Cold War. After Soviet Union dissolution, there should be no more wars, but USA had the Gulf War, Iraq War, Libyan War, Afghanistan War, etc. When Bush invaded Iraq on suspicion of Iraq harbouring WMDs, the UN Secretary Kofi Ahnan had called the US invasion of Iraq illegal. So why blame UN for US actions?
    1
  25236. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25237. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  25238. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25239. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25240. Even the United States of American accepts that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25241. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25242.  @gottagowork  "Not all the west identify with the US." I never said anything about the United States here in this thread, I am talking about Western culture in general.
    1
  25243. For years, the USA have been inciting political unrest in so-called "banana republic" countries. Now Americans are protesting election results, just like one.
    1
  25244.  Gaylord Manlove  Source: German IT watchdog says 'no evidence' of Huawei spying thelocal.de/20181216/german-it-watchdog-says-no-evidence-of-huawei-spying Germany's IT watchdog has expressed scepticism about calls for a boycott of Chinese telecoms giant Huawei, saying it has seen no evidence the firm could use its equipment to spy for Beijing, news weekly Spiegel reported Friday. "For such serious decisions like a ban, you need proof," the head of Germany's Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Arne Schönbohm, told Spiegel, adding that his agency had no such evidence.
    1
  25245.  @currentchannel3452  Did Cyrus Janssen blame any single country for him getting Covid-19? Otherwise, why are you seemingly jumping to conclusion on Cyrus' thinking? His videos have been about promoting peace and understanding between USA and China, about "Building Bridges, Not Walls" then isn't this a positive message for the world? Because the alternative of promoting war between USA and China is simply unthinkable, it would be disaster for both our countries as well as the entire world.
    1
  25246. Even President Trump recently acknowledged One-China policy, as did Obama before him as well as Bush's administration. Many other world leaders like Vladmir Putin, Angela Merkel, etc, have also acknowledged One-China Policy not just USA alone.
    1
  25247.  @ShuCarolina  Again, once Taiwan's chip technology goes to the U.S, then won't the island be of no further use?
    1
  25248. Did you watch John Oliver's video? The Taiwan government literally resort to fighting and throwing pig intestines at each other, yet they aren't barbarians to you?
    1
  25249.  @少棠丁  "But seriously are you saying that China, a country with one of the most brutal dictatorships, wouldn't intrude such studies like this." Do you have any evidence of China's intrusion into this study by Harvard and Ash Center? Otherwise, it's just your own speculation without proof, why is it inconceivable to you that majority of Chinese support the Communist Party of China? Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made-In-China) having world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd largest military spending. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. Chinese people's lives are improving every day, why is it unfathomable to you to think that a majority of Chinese actually support the CPC?
    1
  25250.  @少棠丁  "Another point is that due to the corrupted education system and the captial government not being in reach of most citizens it's easy for anyone to believe in the propogandas of the CCP" Corrupted education system? The education system in China produced students that scored the highest in PISA for all three subjects: Mathematics, Science and Reading. Here's the results of PISA 2018 ranking: 2018 PISA ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... 2018 PISA ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore, 551 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... 2018 PISA ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ...
    1
  25251.  @少棠丁  (that's why when you focused on the "opinions of the local government" part of the same study that you've just mentioned the rate actually goes all the way down to 10-20%) People's opinion towards local governments are low, because sometimes the local governments are corrupt and unable to solve the provincial problems. But people's opinion towards central government in Beijing is high, because the central government is able to solve big issues. Over the course of 40 years, China has lifted over 800 million people out of poverty and into middle-income class, that's why as long as the central government can deliver economic results, many people in China will continue supporting it. "神州 Shenzhou I don't see why efficiency and face should be more important than democracy and discussion." Because efficiency gets stuff done, what's the point of Western style democracy in Taiwan, throwing water balloons and pig guts in parliament for what? End of the day, Taiwan is still mired in problems. Taiwan used to be one of Four Asian Tigers but since democracy was introduced to Taiwan, it's economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving for jobs in the mainland or Singapore Video: How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents | Insight | CNA Insider youtu.be/P3BCnPb8qHY?t=110 "From the '90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreements on policy matters. This produced less effective policy making. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be more conservative in Taiwan, so they do not enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou, Research Fellow, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica
    1
  25252.  @nihilistlemon1995  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    1
  25253.  @少棠丁  Take smartphones for example and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Oppo, Vivo, OnePlus, Realme, and so on. Here's the Top 10 Mobile Phone Brands in World 2021 Ranking List according to MBS Skool Rank 1. Samsung (Korean) Rank 2. Huawei (Chinese) Rank 3. Apple (American) Rank 4. Xiaomi (Chinese) Rank 5. Oppo (Chinese) Rank 6. Vivo (Chinese) Rank 7. LG (Korean) Rank 8. ZTE (Chinese) Rank 9. Lenovo (Chinese) Rank 10. Realme (Chinese) ... But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  25254.  @少棠丁  You said: "While Taiwan was having the world's biggest economy boom Chinese people suffered from hunger..." Taiwan's economic boom occurred under authoritarian rule of the single-party KMT. Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Even John Oliver acknowledges it at 6:25 of the video. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    1
  25255.  @少棠丁  You said: "you should at least visit both Taiwan and China before you making those claims." You're the one who said that you've never been to mainland China (you said: "Some of the parts are speculations tho I've personally never been to China") and here you are telling me to visit both Taiwan island and the mainland before making those claims?
    1
  25256.  @少棠丁  Besides Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Vivo, etc, China has many successful drone companies like DJI, Yuneec, Autel Robotics, EHang and so on. Here's Top 10 Drone Companies in the world – 2020 according to Global Brands Magazine. 1. DJI (Chinese) 2. Parrot (French) 3. Yuneec (Chinese) 4. Kespry (American) 5. Autel Robotics (Chinese) 6. Skydio (American) 7. Insitu (American) 8. Delair (French) 9. EHang (Chinese) 10. Aerialtronics (Netherlands) ... But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  25257.  @少棠丁  You said: "so believe or not if us were to rule the mainland we wouldve been way more successful then you are rn" Why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1919) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China.
    1
  25258.  @少棠丁  So let's look at the period after Japan surrendered at the end of WWII. After Japan surrendered in 1945, the communists had a strength of 1.2 million (regular) and 2.6 million (militia) (July 1945), whereas the KMT had a strength of 2 million (regular) and 2.3 million (militia) (June 1946) so the KMT still outnumbered the communists, yet the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Taiwan? Not only that, when the KMT retreated to Taiwan, Chiang kai-shek transfered China's gold reserves from Shanghai to Taipei. In 1948, President of the Kuomintang (KMT) government, Chiang Kai-shek was losing the civil war in north-east China against the Communists. He began planning a retreat to Taiwan and he intended to take the gold reserves with him. Estimates of how much was moved differ between sources, ranging from between 3 million – 5 million taels (113.6 tons – 115.2 tons). In The Archives of Gold published in 2010, Dr Wu Sing-yung, outlines how his father (head of finance for the KMT government) helped to mastermind the operation that saw over 4 million taels of gold be moved from Shanghai to Taiwan. One tael is 37.2 grams. That's why mainland China was left devastated and in ruins after civil strife and invasion, whereas Taiwan had an injection of gold to kickstart their industrialisation. You said: "Just a reminder we were having the world's biggest economic boom when millions in the mainland are starving..." Again, Taiwan's economic boom occurred under the authoritarian single-party KMT. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    1
  25259.  @少棠丁  "神州 Shenzhou you do realise that all the gold we took were all originally from the KMT government when they published the official currency by that time by ourselves right?" Firstly, I'm just explaining how the KMT transfered China's gold reserves from Shanghai to Taipei, that's why Taiwan had an injection of capital to kick-start their industrialisation, whereas mainland China was left dirt-poor and ravaged by war, invasion and civil strife, whereas Taipei was relatively unscathed and was even partially industrialised by the Japanese during their occupation of Taiwan. Furthermore, those that fled to Taiwan were the rich landlords and those who remained in the mainland were mostly peasants so that explains the difference in wealth between Taiwan and the mainland. Secondly, Taiwan's economic boom occurred under the authoritarian single-party KMT. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. So why do you look down on the mainland authoritarianism when Taiwan was at it's most prosperous while under authoritarian single-party KMT rule? That was the time they had that economic boom like you said. "so yeah at least we didn't win by doing others dirty lol" The KMT used dirty tactics like destroying a dike and artificially creating a flood in Yellow River in 1938. The 1938 Yellow River flood (花園口決隄事件) was a flood created by the Nationalist Government in central China during the early stage of the Second Sino-Japanese War in an attempt to halt the rapid advance of Japanese forces. It has been called the "largest act of environmental warfare in history" and an example of scorched earth military strategy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1938_Yellow_River_flood According to a postwar report, floods inundated 32 percent of land and 45 percent of villages in 20 affected countries. The worst thing was that Japanese troops were out of its range, and while their advance on Zhengzhou was halted, but they took Wuhan in October by attacking from a different direction. The KMT created flood was unnecessary and killed more Chinese than Japanese.
    1
  25260.  @少棠丁  I've been to Taipei before and the buildings look old, the infrastructure is old and crumbling, wages are stagnant, their economy is stagnant, unemployment is rising, cost of living is rising, and that's why many Taiwan graduates are leaving the island to seek jobs in the mainland or places like Singapore. The local people of Taiwan have a nickname for Taiwan, Ghost Island (鬼岛) because nothing big seems to happen there. But have you been to mainland China and seen the developments taking place here? Here's a short 2-min video of 11 cities in China. Video: 🇨🇳Beautiful Night View of 11 Chinese Cities in 2 Minutes - 中国大陆11座城市美丽夜景 youtu.be/mzR8Scsd33g
    1
  25261.  @少棠丁  You keep boasting about Taiwan's economic boom, well that occurred under authoritarian KMT rule, and Chiang kai-shek transfered gold reserves from Shanghai to Taipei when the KMT fled to Taiwan, leaving the mainland devastated after wars, invasions and civil strife, while Taiwan remained relatively unscathed. About Taiwan's GDP per capita, that's because mainland China has the world's largest population at estimated 1.4 billion people. So when you divide our GDP by our enormous population, then obviously the GDP per capita of Taiwan will be 5 times that of mainland China. "i mean i guess you guys successfully lowered the hong kong house price by sending awful cops but that wasnt even intentional was it lol" Hong Kong's woes are due to capitalism, as the rich HK property tycoons control the scarce land supply and jack up property prices to beyond the reach of ordinary couples income seeking to buy an house. Because the Hong Kong government doesn't gain revenue from tax (HK is a tax haven for corporate capitalists) so they rely on land sales for their income, so they don't mind if HK property prices skyrocket. And Hong Kong cops are their own, why are you claiming that the mainland send cops to Hong Kong?
    1
  25262.  @少棠丁  Taiwan used to be one of Four Asian Tigers under authoritarian KMT rule, but since democracy was introduced to Taiwan, it's economy is in slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and Taiwan graduates are leaving for jobs in the mainland or Singapore Video: How Taiwan Lost Its Roar And Its Young Talents | Insight | CNA Insider youtu.be/P3BCnPb8qHY "From the '90s, Taiwan became a two-party system with more partisan disagreements on policy matters. This produced less effective policy making. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be more conservative in Taiwan, so they do not enthusiastically push for policies to globalise and liberalise the island." - Ray Chou, Research Fellow, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica And what half an hour of playtime a week in 2021 are you talking about? Seriously, you haven't been to China then where do you get this information of what China is like from?
    1
  25263.  @少棠丁  About China's education system, China trains the world's largest number of STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) out of any other, according to Forbes magazine. Here's a list of the countries with the most STEM graduates The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (325,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates [Infographic]
    1
  25264.  @少棠丁  About Education in China, China has also been a top destination for international students and as of 2013, China was the most popular country in Asia for international students and ranked third overall among countries. In 2016, China was the third largest receiver of international students globally, with 442,773 international students. By 2018 this number had grown to 492,185 (10.49% growth from 2017).
    1
  25265.  @少棠丁  "神州 Shenzhou besides im talking about educating students about the true history instead of heavy propogandas." What is the true history? Why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1919) lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan? Chiang transferred gold reserves from Shanghai to Taipei when he abandoned the mainland, leaving the mainland devastated and in ruins, whereas Taiwan was relatively unscathed and had an injection of capital to kickstart their industrialization. And Taiwan economic boom was achieved under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, but you look down on the authoritarian rule in the mainland?
    1
  25266.  @少棠丁  "神州 Shenzhou oh im speaking about the video game policy" That only applies to children below 18 years of age. Adults are unaffected, because this policy is aim at curbing video game addiction among youths. Many countries have imposed age limits on addictive substances/activities like smoking, drinking, gambling, on kids below 18-21 years (varies according to region). Video games have been known to be addictive, so China is merely adding video games to the list of addictive activities. "And about the economic part im just saying but most of us prefer being free instead of wealth (just look at 馬雲for an example)" What makes you think Jack Ma isn't free? Wasn't Jack Ma recently spotted on a cruise ship in Balearic waters off the coast of Spain or something? Also, Jack Ma is good when he does things that benefit humanity, such as when he uploaded Covid19 "handbook" and made it available for download on the web. However, Jack Ma had gone too far when he planned to make an unprecedented Ant Financial IPO deal that would have brought in more cash than did Saudi Aramco did, then clearly that's going a step too far in putting him and his own company's interest over those of the people. So why are you using Jack Ma as an example of preferring being free instead of wealth? Jack Ma was certainly being greedy with his Ant Financial IPO deal wasn't it? "as i previously mentioned all countries tend to have a slowed down economy after the average life quality was raised." But do you acknowledge the fact that Taiwan's previous economic boom occurred under the authoritarian single-party rule of the KMT? You repeatedly boasted that Taiwan had the "world's largest economic boom" yet clearly that occurred during the martial law period of Taiwan under Chiang kai-shek. Today, Taiwan is actually suffering under democracy, it's economy is stagnant, wages are stagnant, unemployment is rising, cost of living is rising, and many Taiwan graduates are leaving the island to seek job opportunities elsewhere, like in the mainland or Singapore for example.
    1
  25267.  @少棠丁  "PPP was calculated by dividing the total earned money of the country with the amount of people in the country which of course makes it the representative of a country's average income." So mainland China having a huge population makes the value lower, since you have to divide the total earned money by our enormous population, then of course the value becomes lower than the population of Taiwan island. Because we have a larger population in the mainland so of course after dividing by the enormous population, our average income is 5 times less than Taiwan, but that's a product of our population. "As a country with bigger population you also gets a higher GDP but dividing it with the citizens count in China makes up with it." Look at India for comparion, they are the world's 2nd most populous country (and the world's largest democracy) and yet their GDP per capita is far lower than China's GDP per capita, despite India having adopted a Western brand of democracy. Then is this any incentive for China to abandon our current political system and adopt a Western-style democracy? "Considering that China has lesser percentages of older and younger person and huge mines it's obviously enough how many potientials you guys has wasted over the past few decades." Minds are only as good once they've been allowed to reach their full potential through education. In the past, it's because China was devastated after WWII and civil strife, and Chiang transferred China's gold reserves from Shanghai to Taipei, leaving the mainland poor. But under Chairman Mao, illiteracy rates have plummeted. Communist Party chairman Mao Zedong proclaimed the establishment of the People’s Republic of China on October 1, 1949, after the Chinese Civil War. Subsequently, the illiteracy rate of China, which stood at roughly 85-90% when it was first calculated at the turn of the 20th century, began to decrease significantly from the 1950s onward. By 1959, illiteracy rates among youth and adults (ages twelve to 40) had fallen from 80% to 43%, and they have been steadily decreasing since. China is now expected to reach near-universal youth literacy in 2015. China’s literacy success has been described as “perhaps the single greatest educational effort in human history” (Peterson, 1997).
    1
  25268.  @少棠丁  Apart from Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Vivo, DJI, Yuneec, Ehang, etc, China is also home to many of the world's largest banks, such as Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, China Construction Bank, Agricultural Bank of China, Bank of China, Postal Savings Bank of China, Bank of Communications, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank (China), China Minsheng Bank, Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, China CITIC Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Huaxia Bank, Bank of Beijing, China Guangfa Bank, Bank of Shanghai, Bank of Jiangsu, China Zheshang Bank and so on. ... Source: Wikipedia: List of largest banks But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as compared to the mainland? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  25269.  @coreycarter6061  Is John Oliver the president of China? President Xi Jinping has publicly stated that "peaceful reunification" of Taiwan island with the mainland is Beijing's goal.
    1
  25270.  @oscaralegre3683  It's becomes barbarism when it's Taiwan's own parliament members fighting (at 8:20 ) and throwing punches, furniture, water balloons and even pig guts at each other. Taiwan island is suffering under democracy, they were at their most successful under the authoritarian single-party KMT rule of Chiang kai-shek.
    1
  25271.  @oscaralegre3683  What killing of Uighurs? The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2020 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 11 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China
    1
  25272.  @oscaralegre3683  How are Uighurs being mistreated? I showed people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  25273.  @nihilistlemon1995  What makes you think I'm being paid by the government just for pointing out facts? And what makes you think YouTube is banned in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which persona has been arrested just for doing so?
    1
  25274.  @mar07in  "Scholars estimate that at least one million Uyghurs have been arbitrarily detained in the Xinjiang internment camps since 2017" But where did this figure of 1 million Uighurs in detention arise from? Turns out that this figure comes from two unreliable sources, one of which interviewed a meager 8 Uighurs on what they think the number of people detained is, and they extrapolated their guesses to arrive at the figure of 1 million Uighurs in detention. youtu.be/1_JBEb6OMiw?t=171
    1
  25275.  @mar07in  I've shown people this short 3-min video of Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China, and many couldn't believe this is actually Xinjiang! https://youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA
    1
  25276.  @briandoyle6534  If you claim Taiwan is thr original China then why'd the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) lost the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Taiwan island? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan island? If anything, this demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists right to rule China. As for the Covid-19 origins, China happened to be the country that notified the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019. By 5th Jan 2020 China had identified and isolated the coronavirus strain in record time and by 12th Jan 2020 China had sequenced Covid-19 genome in record time and shared the information with WHO. China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Even the WHO investigation team arrived in Wuhan on January 2021 and they visited Wuhan Huanan Seafood Market and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Their findings indicate that the coronavirus entered Wuhan market from outside, and they all but dismissed the possibility of a lab leak as highly unlikely.
    1
  25277. ​ @mar07in  About laowhy86, he has a history of lying to his audiences. Like that time he and serpentza claimed that Dune movie posters in China omitted black actress Sharon Duncan Brewster. But this lie has since been debunked and the Dune movie posters in China do feature Sharon in them. https://youtu.be/zu6WJBVMgHM
    1
  25278.  @mar07in  On 19 Dec, Singaporean newspaper, Lianhe Zaobao interviewed Peng Shuai at an International Ski Federation cross-country skiing event in Shanghai, where she said she has been staying at home and is free. She also denies the allegation of sexual assault in her post, and that she values her personal privacy. Here's the video interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZF9Owb9uSOE
    1
  25279.  @mar07in  She kept asking to repeat questions because she couldn't hear what the Singaporean newspaper reporter was saying. And you're saying in bold that she wrote an entire accusation on Twitter? Could you link me where did Peng Shuai ever said anything about a sexual assault on Twitter like you said? Show me the Twitter link and what Peng Shuai wrote on Twitter. You said that newspaper as in Singapore newspaper Lianhe Zaobao is a Chinese-sponsored newspaper? Where's your evidence that the Singaporean newspaper is Chinese-sponsored? Lianhe Zaobao (联合早报 literally "Joint Morning Paper"), is the largest Singaporean Chinese-language newspaper with a daily circulation of about 200,000. Published by Singapore Press Holdings (SPH), it was formed on 16 March 1983 as a result of a merger between Nanyang Siang Pau and Sin Chew Jit Poh, two of Singapore's oldest Chinese newspapers. It is SPH's flagship Chinese daily, the only Chinese-language morning daily in Singapore. As with all Chinese-language publications currently based in Singapore, it is printed in simplified Chinese. So where's the evidence that this Singaporean newspaper is Chinese-sponsored like you said?
    1
  25280.  @mar07in  Again, Lianhe Zaobao is a Singaporean-based newspaper by Singapore Press Holding, then what's so suspicious about it being allowed in mainland China? In 2009, the paper was temporarily blocked in China for unknown reasons. The paper was again reportedly blocked in 2017 with no reasons cited. Lianhe Zaobao had coverage on Nobel-Prizer winner Liu Xiaobo's death in 2017, so what's so suspicious about this Singaporean Chinese-language newspaper? Also, previously you said Peng Shuai wrote an entire accusation on Twitter, (in bold letters too) then could you please link me where did Peng Shuai ever wrote an accusation of sexual assault on Twitter? I checked Twitter and since when did Peng Shuai ever wrote such an entire accusation like you said? What did Peng Shuai wrote in her Twitter post, you tell me?
    1
  25281. Indians be like: "Welcome to India, Jason!"
    1
  25282. As Chinese myself, I personally found many Hollywood movies to be severely lacking in Asian actors. Asian actors (Chinese,Japanese, Koreans) are simply underrepresented in Hollywood, often casted into cliche roles like triad thug, martial artist, nerdy but social inept guy, hacker, etc. Asian actresses often get roles as damsel in distress (to be saved by "white" male lead) or prostitutes, dragon ladies, massage parlor workers, other sexualized roles etc. Also, there's also "white-washing" of Asian characters, that is, the casting of white actor/actress to portray a character of Asian descent on film. Hopefully, China's influence on Hollywood can grant more prominent roles to Asian actors/actresses.
    1
  25283.  @Legacy241  You don't care about China being successful, all you done is s**t on China's achievements all the time, it's as though China can do nothing good in your eyes, so you're clearly anti-China. Because you care absolutely nothing for China's interests.
    1
  25284.  @Legacy241  Besides high-speed trains, China is also home to two of top five world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight (神威·太湖之光) and Tianhe-2 (天河-2) and in 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Video: Sunway TaihuLight named world's fastest supercomputer youtu.be/KEdsrT1mFAU Source: China surpasses US in supercomputers usage on Top500 list cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/
    1
  25285.  @Legacy241  Video: China never invade nor colonize other countries or territories. Martin Jacques youtu.be/XDX8nQIEhJY
    1
  25286.  @Legacy241  Are you perhaps talking about the Yuan Dynasty when after the Mongols conquered Song Dynasty China? Yuan Dynasty China was when the Mongols were in charge and their babaric leadership seek to invade and control the largest land empire on the face of the Earth. Here's a map of Yuan Dynasty China. Source: Map of Yuan Dynasty China images.chinahighlights.com/allpicture/2017/04/yuan.jpg I mean, you're clearly anti-China, not once did you actually say anything remotely positive about China, all you done is mock China's achievements, so why pretend that you're not anti-China when you clearly are?
    1
  25287.  @Legacy241  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw Source: Yang Liwei wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Liwei This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  25288.  @Legacy241  You anti-China people care absolutely nothing for China's interests. Not once did you mention anything remotely positive about China, so why pretend that you're not anti-China when you clearly are? In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    1
  25289.  @Legacy241  I have refuted all your so-called facts, look I even cited numerous sources to support my arguments, whereas you have given nothing to support yours. Thus far, you failed to mention a single positive thing about China, so why pretend that you're not anti-China when you clearly are? Not once did you ever said anything remotely positive about China. Look at the bigger picture? It's clear that anti-China sentiment is growing in Western countries, because Western anti-China propaganda constantly "demonise" our country and paint China as the enemy, so don't be surprised if Chinese start treating Westerners like one. About peace, China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    1
  25290.  @Legacy241  Anti-China sentiment is growing in the West, because the whole "Yellow Peril" mindset never truly died out. Since the 19th century, Westerners have been throughly accustomed to the idea of Western dominance, where Britain was a colonial superpower during 19th century but was eventually overtaken by USA in 20th century. But prior to that, China (and also India) had been economic superpower for 1800 years and we made up 25% of the world's GDP share, according to world leading British economist, Angus Maddison. Source: Global distribution of GDP among China, India, Western Europe, USA, Middle East from 1 AD to 2003 AD wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA_Middle_East.png And judging from the above trend, it looks as though China is all set to dominate the 21st century. And the very thought of a non-Western, non-democratic country like China, someday surpassing the United States as the premier world superpower is simply too frightening for Westerners to conceive, that's why they virulently oppose China's rise.
    1
  25291.  @Legacy241  China's ghost cities are slowly being filled up. For example, in 2011, London’s Daily Mail reported that Zhengzhou was China’s largest ghost city. But today, Zhengzhou has a has a population of 10,120,000 inhabitants, and had a GDP of 1,014 billion(RMB) in 2018. Don't believe me? Here's a short 4min video of beautiful Zhengzhou: youtu.be/jFdLkgDS-QE?t=8 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience) Chinese government actually builds infrastructure in ahead of the demand, that's why people migrating from the rural countryside in China have houses, infrastructure and amenities already built for in anticipation of their arrival and occupation.
    1
  25292.  @Legacy241  Didn't you see my earlier comment about how China has arguably the world's best infrastructure construction? China is also home to many of the world's skyscrapers according to the following source: Countries or Jurisdictions Ranked by Number of 150m+ Completed Buildings 1. China (2,177) 2. United States (807) 3. Japan (257) 4. United Arab Emirates (253) 5. South Korea (221) ... Source: Countries or Jurisdictions Ranked by Number of 150m+ Completed Buildings skyscrapercenter.com/countries So you have admitted that you never actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself, then why do you already have a negative opinion about our country? Because the biased Western anti-China propaganda been painting negative image of China in your mind?
    1
  25293.  @Legacy241  Of course I want China to succeed, because I've been proudly showcasing China's accomplishments, but all you done is s**t on China's achievements, so why pretend that you're not anti-China when you clearly are? You care absolutely nothing for China's interests, nor do you even wish to see China succeed, so why pretend otherwise? Over 70 years ago, nobody thought China would ever succeed, become a world power or play an important role in global politics, yet look at how far China has gone, under the leadership of the Communist Party of China. You're the one constantly mocking China's success under the communist party, it's as though China can do nothing good in your eyes.
    1
  25294.  @Legacy241  About so-called stealing technology, when those foreign companies (like Apple or Nike) come to China, they agreed to transfer technology as part of the terms of setting up shop here in China. Nobody point a gun at these foreign companies and force them to set up shop here, if they don't agree with our terms, then they are always welcome to pack their bags and take their business elsewhere. But if they want to do business in China then they should obey Chinese laws while in China that's all. It's our country, our laws, just like it's your country, your laws. No one forced those companies to set up shop here and agree to tech transfers. But after transferring the technology, they are suddenly turning around and accusing China of stealing technology? Even when they agreed to the transfers?
    1
  25295.  @Legacy241  China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, so why do you claim China doesn't want peace? China is not interested in spreading ideology like the former Soviet Union did with communism, or the USA is doing with democracy. President Xi Jinping has publicly stated that China's political system is not for export. Source: Reuters: President Xi says China will not export its political system reuters.com/article/us-china-parties-idUSKBN1DV4UM “We will not import other countries’ models, and will not export the China model,” President Xi said. “We will provide more opportunities for the world through our development,” he said.
    1
  25296.  @Legacy241  Here's the CEOs of Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple responding to Congress about whether China steals US technology. The CEOs were all asked the question whether the Chinese government steals technology from their companies. 3 out of 4 answered "No" whereas only Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook said "Yes". Video: Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple respond to Congress about whether China steals US technology youtu.be/v6whxZm1ubQ
    1
  25297.  @Legacy241  I care about China far more than you, I want to see China succeed and someday surpass the United States as the premier world superpower in the future. But all you done is mock China's achievements that's all, so why pretend that you're not anti-China when you clearly are? You care absolutely nothing for China's interests, nor do you actually want China to succeed under the Communist Party government.
    1
  25298.  @Legacy241  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  25299.  @Legacy241  What freedom of opinion in the West? I've been to Western countries and tried to tell them about China's success under the Communist Party of China, yet Westerners laughed at me, called me a shill, and simply refused to believe me, even though I came from China yet these Westerners never actually set foot in China and see what life is like here for themselves. How's that freedoms of opinion when Westerners refuse to hear anything remotely positive about China?
    1
  25300.  @Legacy241  About Communism versus Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, healthcare, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, people lacking access to healthcare, the marginalised, etc. Because capitalism means that the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of getting profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    1
  25301.  @Legacy241  "神州 Shenzhou Your definition of both are a bit misleading. There is more to it than what you explained." Why don't you point out which part of my definition is misleading then? Of course there's always more to explain, but where I go into deep detail over IP rights (I brought up Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple testifying in Congress) you just skim over China's problems without going into detail. Here's Dr Richard Wolff explaining how alleged IP theft in China is actually just technology transfers. Source: Wolff Responds: China's Intellectual Property Theft youtu.be/n_klwY2RJDc It's the capitalistic economy of China that's containing the ills of capitalism, while the Communist government is what keeps the capitalists from obtaining too much power. In China, the communist government controls the state-owned corporations for China's benefits, whereas in USA the US corporations control the U.S government for profit, such as the military industrial complex waging wars in Middle East to control the oil prices. So why do you still think China isn't peaceful,when USA is clearly the warmonger? About the free market system, it can be likened to a wild, untamed river, flowing to and fro according to market forces. Would you let the river flow uncontrollably, causing damage to your markets? Because that's what's happening in America's free market, they open the floodgates and allow Chinese goods to flood their markets and big USA corporations are setting up shop in low labour countries like China and Vietnam, leaving American workers high and dry. Because that's what happens in a free market. Whereas China's approach is to "tame to river" and maximise the benefits to China. Our fledgling Chinese companies would surely perish if exposed directly to global competition, so the government shields them by providing home advantage to Chinese companies to give them the edge over the foreign competition in China. Once our local Chinese companies have gained experience, they can slowly start expanding outside of China. Huawei and Tik Tok are some examples of Chinese companies that have successfully expanded beyond China's market. This demonstrates that China's political and economic system is successful for our country, so is there really a need to suddenly abandon our political system and adopt Western liberal democracy? Why should China fix something that clearly works for China? Because you foreigners can't stand to see China succeed under communist party rule?
    1
  25302.  @Legacy241  How is Taiwan more efficient than the mainland? Here's video of Taiwan parliament fight, throwing furniture and water balloons (they actually prepared those ahead of time?) Video: Taiwanese parliament broke out into a water balloon and chair-throwing brawl youtu.be/mMvkusAI9DM How's that better? Why should mainland China strive to become like Taiwan? Because you say so? Here's the Communist Party of China's 19th National Party Congress and that's how governments should behave, not like Taiwan's government fight. Video: Full video: Opening session of 19th CPC National Congress youtu.be/X3pc3SqK5jI
    1
  25303.  @stevens1041  China achieved it's objective in Vietnam in 1980, which was a punitive mission, meant to punish Vietnam for their invasion of Cambodia and overthrowing it's government. The People's Liberation Army fought all the way to Vietnam's capital and the Vietnamese were powerless to resist the PLA's advance to Hanoi. But since China had no plans to occupy Vietnam, China declared the path to Hanoi open and withdrew from Vietnam.
    1
  25304. China and USA are each other's largest trading partner. How is India a relevant trading partner between these our countries?
    1
  25305. Apurva Bhavsar What illegal trading? Americans are buying up cheap Chinese goods from Walmart, and they are loving it. They save money on living expenses thanks to Chinese goods, and they can use the money saved to spend on the finer things like cars, houses, getting married, etc.
    1
  25306.  @ibrahim-sj2cr  You said: "$1.5B of electronics and machinery sure that can be automated but what about the rest? the majority" China aims to move away from an economy of labor-intensive workshops into a more technology-intensive powerhouse with more value added, as part of the Made-in-China 2025 plan. China is transitioning from a producer of cheap low-tech goods facilitated by lower labour costs towards production in high-tech products and services.
    1
  25307.  @NoComplience  Foreign investment flows into China have increased by at least 80 billion, from 500 billion in the previous period to 580 billion in January-August of 2024. Even you arrived at the figure of CNY 580.19 billion (USD 81.80 billion), so clearly this represents an increase in foreign investment in China.
    1
  25308.  @NoComplience  You said FDI into China slumped to CNY 580.19 billion during January-August of 2024, a steeper than the 29.6% drop in the first seven months of 2024. Here's the FDI in the first seven months of 2024 Jan 2024: 156.6 billion Feb 2024: 300 billion Mar 2024: 424.6 billion April 2024: 497 billion May 2024: 497.3 billion June 2024: 498.91 billion ... Aug 2024: 580.19 billion (Source: Trading Economics: China's Foreign Direct Investment) So clearly, FDI into China increased by at least 80 billion, from 500 billion in the previous period, and even you arrived at this figure.
    1
  25309.  @sultansulta9673  Did China murder any journalist like that Saudi Arabia Crown Prince did to Khashoggi?
    1
  25310.  @laserraiset3300  Check your German tools whether they have the Made-in-China label stamped on them.
    1
  25311.  @laserraiset3300  Check again. There's a set of mechanic tools called "Möller Germany", but the box clearly says the tools were "Made in P.R.C.". Even Walter Tools have the label "Made-in-China"
    1
  25312.  @MarkYeung1  "Shenzhou. Had China willing to import coal from Australia, the shortage and blackout would not happen in the first place." This is merely your own speculation that's all. There's no guarantee that there will not be shortage and blackout in China even if China had been willing to import coal from Australia. You claimed that the "reserves ran out" but power was restored to the Chinese cities in a matter of weeks, and China only resumed importing Australian coal 2 years later (in 2023, when the blackouts were in 2021).
    1
  25313.  @MarkYeung1  "So, with so much coal reserves, why did the coal shortage and power outages occur?" Because even with a huge coal reserve, China is so vast that simply delivering the coal to the needed region takes time. But once the coal is delivered, then power was restored to those Chinese cities. You keep asking people "Have you been to China?" but it looks as though you don't even know the scale of China in the first place.
    1
  25314.  @MarkYeung1 You said the "it took almost a year for the reserves to be consumed," yet China only resumed importing Australian coal in 2023. So are you saying China had no coal for all of 2021 and 2022? Of course not, it shows that the blackouts were independent of whether China imported Australian coal or not.
    1
  25315. Rejoice. Thanks to Russia and China, world is transitioning towards a multipolar world, dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world, dominated by single voice (namely that of the US's and its "vassals")
    1
  25316. Russia and China are facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world, dominated by a multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US's and its "vassals")
    1
  25317. @yaşa Everywhere in the world, Han Chinese are not afraid of hard work, working as railroad construction workers, richshaw drivers, laborers (coolies), laudromat workers, dry cleaners, chefs (of Chinese restaurants) nail salons, massage parlours, etc. No 'blue collar' job is below Chinese workers mindset Chinese parents save up money to send their kids to school, and they study hard instead of drinking and partying around like other races. These kids strive to become doctors, lawyers, dentists, bankers, scientists, programmers, businessmen, etc, and contribute back to society. No 'white collar' job is above Chinese potentials So why can't China impart these positive traits to other races?
    1
  25318. +Sheesh Why don't you watch both Western and Chinese media then? Chinese media like CGTV and New China TV are constantly displaying China's progress such as launching a new railway line, or launching satellite into space, or how to promote better economic cooperation with the West. But Western media like CNN, BBC or Fox News constantly talk about possible war with China, or starting a trade war with China or how Chinese government restrict freedom, etc. So how do you expect Western countries to interact with China to evolve a mutually beneficial and peaceful future this way?
    1
  25319. The explosion in search for "immigration", could possivly be from the foreigners and expats living in Shanghai seeking to immigrate elsewhere.
    1
  25320. Pushpa Kunwar Do you really know the situation at all? You mean if President Xi Jinping does bad things, nobody in China will speak of it? How stupid do you think Chinese people are? Of course if Xi Jinping is unpopular, then people will speak out about it. But his anti+corruption crackdowns are popular and extending his term will maximise the benefits of such policies.
    1
  25321.  @songroid4847  You said: "( There is no need to say anything about failed communism. ) And if that dictator had not come down, times would have continued to be worse than in North Korea, where the dictator had been hiding." But have you actually been to North Korea? Back then, South Korea under democracy was in fact poorer than sub-Saharan African countries, and it was North Korea that was the greater economic and military power on the Korean peninsula. It's because of US imposing sanctions on DPRK, which stymied its economic growth, while at the same time, US was pumping billions of dollars of economic aid into its neighbor, S. Korea. So it's little unfair to claim that communism failed, when there were clearly outside forces (especially the US) that led to the current state of the two Koreas.
    1
  25322.  @Tito_michi  Not only was North Korean industry bombed, but the US also sanctioned the DPRK, while pouring foreign aid into its neighbor South Korea. After WWII, the US invested some $35 billion in economic foreign assistance into South Korea.
    1
  25323.  @rap3208  Agreed. More people in Taiwan need to wake up to the realisation that USA doesn't care about the people in Taiwan (neither do they care about Afghanistans or Ukrainians). Their goal is to use Taiwan as a chess piece to contain the mainland's rise.
    1
  25324. Many Chinese tend to be optimistic and look forward towards a bright future ahead. However, many in the West are increasingly pessimistic and tend to have a gloomy outlook of the future.
    1
  25325. Actually, the oil tanker that transferred the oil cargo to North Korean vessels did so under a Taiwan-based charterer, Billions Bunker Group Corp
    1
  25326.  @martinbelfort5113  Why do you want to know the time?
    1
  25327.  @namelesssnitchy  During the Chinese Civil War, the KMT held all the advantages; they were wealthy (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? Even in Taiwan, KMT is a shadow of its former glory, even though much of Taiwan's economic success occurred under the authoritarian rule single-party rule of KMT.
    1
  25328. China is currently peaceful and not at war with any country since our last major war in 1979, but USA is invading countries in Middle East like Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya even in 21st century and cutting off their heads (Mummar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Now USA is targeting Syria and the Assad Regime is next on the list.
    1
  25329.  @alanliu6848  What wall did America even build? Are you insinuating that Chinese Americans should also be told to leave the USA as well?
    1
  25330.  @alanliu6848  Really? Did Trump do that? Then why is America still suffering from border problems even if such a wall had been built?
    1
  25331. China mostly manufacture our own weapons, ammunition, tanks, fighter jets, submarines, missiles, etc. but India continues to rely on purchasing military equipment from USA and Russia, whom are most likely to increase the price during times of war, since they know India has no choice but to buy from them.
    1
  25332. +Girish Radhakrishnan If Chinese weapons don't last long, then China will simply make more of it. No matter how long you think US weapons will last, India eventually needs to buy more weapons.
    1
  25333. +Girish Radhakrishnan No matter how good and awesome you claim India's bought weapons are, they will still break down eventually, and you will have to import more weapons. Buying weapons from overseas costs money like you said, and USA can always just increase the prices when they know India wants to buy their weapons. So, who are you to look down on Chinese people, for manufacturing our own weapons in first place? Does India even manufacture its own weapons?
    1
  25334.  @zackk4969  China built world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with clean renewable energy to help reduce our CO2 emissions. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtu.be/j3J196bLP5E
    1
  25335. Chinese government come up with many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans to map out China's future in 2020, 2030, 2050, etc. If the leader is in power longer, then he can see the plan to fruition, but if country like USA only have terms for 4-8 years, then how to make long term plans successfully?
    1
  25336. Americans are taking the news wrongly. China still has tariffs on US soybeans and other agriculture, affecting US economy, but by lowering automotive tariffs in China (China's automotive industry is world's largest) the USA will face increased competition from other foreign car companies wanting a bigger share of China's automotive industry.
    1
  25337.  @baojhoang7242  Yes, the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). It was suppose to help small businesses but because it was a first-come first serve basis, the money was grabbed up by big companies until the PPP eventually ran out of funds altogether. It's another example of how big corporations get bailed out but not the smaller ones.
    1
  25338.  @baojhoang7242  According to the NYT article published May 4, 2021: The Paycheck Protection Program is out of money. Four weeks before its scheduled end, the federal government’s signature aid effort for small business ravaged by the pandemic — the Paycheck Protection Program — ran out of funding on Tuesday afternoon and stopped accepting most new applications.
    1
  25339.  @trevorgough2286  "神州 Shenzhou pillock" Are you referring to mansana or me when you said that?
    1
  25340. In China, the Chinese government controls the Chinese corporations for China's benefit, reining in companies when they strayed too far. In the United States, the rich U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.
    1
  25341. China is fighting a war on poverty. USA is fighting a war on poor people themselves.
    1
  25342. The truth is that the country that cares the most about Taiwan is mainland China. Mainlanders consider the people of Taiwan as our brothers and sister and aim for peaceful reunification, whereas the U.S don't care about the island as long as they can use it to contain the mainland's rise, going so far as taking provocative actions such as Pelosi's visit. And it's all without regard for how the people of Taiwan feel.
    1
  25343. The truth is that the country that cares the most about Taiwan is mainland China. Mainlanders consider the people of Taiwan as our brothers and sister and aim for peaceful reunification, whereas the U.S don't care about the island as long as they can use it to contain the mainland's rise.
    1
  25344. The country that cares the most about Taiwan is mainland China. Mainlanders consider the people of Taiwan as our brothers and sister and aim for peaceful reunification, whereas the U.S is willing to take provocative actions (i.e Pelosi's visit) without a care for the people in the island.
    1
  25345. +Vishal Kumar China has always encouraged Indian participation in Belt and Road Initiative and it is entirely India's choice not to get involved for reasons of its own. China does not force India to participate in OBOR if it doesn't want to.
    1
  25346. +Joy R Ancient Bharat consisted of Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nepal, etc. but today, modern India does not control those countries, so India's participation in China's new silk road is not an absolute must. Here is a map of the ancient Silk Road, and India is only one of routes, but not the main trade artery. (orexca.com/silk_road.html )
    1
  25347. China been fighting Japanese since 1931, years before Nazi Germany even invaded Poland. In contrast USA, Britain and USSR only fought Japanese for about 3 years (1942-45). So China fought Japan for 14 years, with 11 years alone (1931-1942) and 3 years with Allied help, whereas, Allies only fought Japan for 3 years (1942-45), with Chinese help. There is a reason why China was inducted into United Nations Security Council, not India.
    1
  25348. Actually, China only suspend Donglong construction because of worsening weather conditions due to onset of winter. Next year when winter ends, the conditions will change and the government might decide resume road construction.
    1
  25349. China has had 5000 years of governance compared to USA's 200-300 years of democracy, so why should China adopt democracy? Ancient democratic country like Rome fell to barbarians, while Chinese civilization has survived the course of history to the present day on our own. Having Multiparty system, means that the two parties will compete against each other, instead of for the country's interest. Take USA multi-party system for example. Present Obama spent 8 years developing Trans Pacific Partnership, only for Trump to come in and cancel the policy, because Trump doesn't like Obama (Obama humiliated him publicly with his birth cert) All the taxpayers money put into TPP all go down the drain, because of Trump's actions. USA can afford to waste billions of dollars just like that, but not China. Having a single party like China, means that there is continuation of policies and the government can make long term policies to benefit China, instead of short-term policies that may get cancelled by another incoming party. Such a system is not perfect, but if it works for China and bring prosperity and development, then Chinese people don't see any major reason to change our government.
    1
  25350. Agreed. Just take global Covid-19 Vaccine distributions for example. Supply of Covid vaccines is scarce, and because we live in a capitalistic world, the rich developed countries are buying up and hoarding vaccines, leaving little to none for the developing world. Communism is the belief that resources should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." Had we been living in a communistic world, then vaccines would be distributed according to needs.
    1
  25351.  @MarkYeung1  What happened to them? I've already told you what happened to them. In 2018, Yavlinsky ran against Putin and only got 1.05% of the vote. As for Alexei Navlany, in 2023 according to a poll by the Levada Center, only 9% of respondents said they held a positive view of Alexei Navalny, 57% disapproved of his activities, and 23% had never heard of him. So many things happen in a person's life time, you go to be more specific when you ask what happened to people.
    1
  25352.  @MarkYeung1  According to Bloomberg: (Bloomberg) -- Veteran Russian pro-democracy politician Grigory Yavlinsky decided against running in the upcoming presidential race in which Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to secure a crushing victory. Yavlinsky, 71, the three-time candidate, won’t take part in the election, his press service said Saturday. He would only consider running if he got 10 million signatures to support his candidacy, but only has about 1 million, Yavlinsky said in an interview to an online program run by independent journalists on YouTube.
    1
  25353.  @everythingandmore5537  Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  25354.  @geoeconomics3067  No EurAsian challenger? So if an African or South American challenger rises someday in the future to challenge the United States, does that mean it is permitted? Or is white supremacy so deep rooted, that the thought of an African superpower is too absurd that it's simply not given consideration.
    1
  25355.  @geoeconomics3067  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  25356.  @MrPurge11  I read the whole post and it's evident that Peng Shuai was extremely emotional, and had a tumultuous, "on-and-off" relationship with a much older man. But where are the allegations of sexual assault? Peng Shuai had sent an email to WTA saying that the allegations of sexual assault were not true (as evident in your post) and she critized the WTA for releasing unverified information without her consent. And judging by the post, it's clear that Peng Shuai would want to avoid the public eye given that her personal relationship with a decades older man is exposed, so she has expressed her desire for her privacy to be respected. But Western media aren't interested in respecting her wishes and they are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see.
    1
  25357. ​ @MrPurge11  "神州 Shenzhou Only those protecting the CCP would say that, if sexual misconduct happens to those who use their power over the vulnerable, why should the CCP government be any different." No, I'm being rational here and logically asking the simple question: Where is her allegation of sexual assault in Peng Shuai's post? Otherwise, why are you seemingly accusing others without proof? "The problem with your argument is that you do not lay claim to any investigation. So sensible people can clearly see this is a cover up." We haven't even established the supposed allegation of sexual assault then how are we going to proceed to an investigation (or even arrive at a cover-up) when the first step hasn't even been done?
    1
  25358.  @MrPurge11  Peng Shuai has sent an email to WTA saying that the allegations of sexual assault are not true, and she criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent. You can't even pick out the line that claiming she was sexually assaulted in your translation of Peng Shuai's post, then on what credibility are Western media and WTA pursuing this issue?
    1
  25359.  @MrPurge11  "神州 Shenzhou No, what you are trying to do is cover it up for the CCP government." How is asking where are the allegations of sexual assault in Peng Shuai's post covering up for the Communist Party of China? I'm asking the first question vital to any investigation and where is the allegation? You said: "You are not even pointing to options on what if Peng is correct, all you are doing is trying to convince the otherwise." No, I'm starting at the beginning by asking the question of where is the allegation of sexual assault in Peng Shuai's post, how have I jumped to option's on who is correct and who is wrong? On the other hand, you already seem convinced that CPC is wrong and trying to cover it up, so aren't you the one jumping to conclusions here without proof?
    1
  25360.  @MrPurge11  "神州 Shenzhou The CCP is wrong because they are spending more time with a propaganda drive trying to convince people that Peng Shuai is lying and that it was only an affair." So where's the allegation of sexual assault by Peng Shuai then? Even Peng Shuai herself said in an email to WTA that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent. You seem convinced that the CPC is trying to convince people that Peng Shuai is lying, when you can't even point to her allegations in the first place, it's like you're just straw manning the argument that's all. You said: "What the CCP should be doing is taking up the WTA suggestion for an independent investigation" Where have I heard this before? It's like the Western countries are trying to politicize this investigation instead of respecting Peng Shuai's wish for her privacy to be respected.
    1
  25361.  @santosturmio8189  "神州 Shenzhou it's sad to see that their propaganda worked on you" No, the Western anti-China propaganda didn't work on me. I read Peng Shuai's post and nowhere in that post was there any allegation of sexual assault, unlike what Western media is claiming.
    1
  25362.  @santosturmio8189  You said: "I love China and I lived there for 10 years. When you realise what your current government is doing to you You could finally become a truly great country." And what is the current government doing to China? Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along. Then how exactly is China on the wrong path?
    1
  25363.  @stephennewby5060  "神州 Shenzhou hahaha either your so stupid to believe the s**te coming out of the chinese leadership or you are in fact working for them……muppet" Those words were from Peng Shuai when she sent an email to WTA saying that the allegations of sexual assault were not true, and she also criticised the WTA for releasing unverified information without her consent. The Communist Party of China has thus far, refused to comment on this issue, so what words are coming out of the Chinese leadership?
    1
  25364.  Kimming Ong  Carrie Lam has already formally withdrawn the HK extradition bill, yet why the Hong Kong protests still continue? Carrie Lam is also open to dialogue but if the protestors themselves don't want to talk, and just continue destroying Hong Kong, then obviously more authoritarian measures are needed.
    1
  25365. The dollar is taking itself down. BRICS is coming up with an alternative currency.
    1
  25366.  @eynemig-174ji  Precisely. Since 1980s, the Bhutanese military have expelled over 100,000 Bhutanese of Nepali origins (around 40% of Bhutan's population at the time). No Bhutanese refugees have been allowed to return to Bhutan despite negotiations taking place. I won't call these "Asian values". If anything, Bhutan's values ostensibly shares more in common with the West than with Asia.
    1
  25367.  @kelzangyoeser5133  Neutrality in Bhutan can be achieved by having BOTH Chinese embassy and Indian embassy. Yet Bhutan have Indian embassy but not Chinese embassy, so in my opinion, Bhutan is not neutral. As for border dispute, China have signed border treaty with 12 out of 14 of our land neighbors. Here's the 12 land neighbors that sign border treaty with China: -In 1915, Tajikistan and China signed border treaty -In 1960, Myanmar and China signed border treaty -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed border treaty -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed border treaty -In 1963, Nepal and China signed border treaty -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border treaty -In 1964, North Korea and China signed border treaty -In 1991, Soviet Union and China signed border treaty -In 1992, Laos and China signed border treaty -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border treaty -In 1996, Kyrgyzstan and China signed border treaty -In 1999, Vietnam and China signed border treaty Only Bhutan and India refuse to sign border treaty with China. Mind you, China has had 25th rounds of border talk with Bhutan (and 30th rounds of talks with India) but still fail to settle the border dispute with Bhutan. So who is really delaying resolving the border dispute here? 25 border talks with Bhutan. All 25 times failed.
    1
  25368.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  Anecdotal evidence is consists of personal experience or narrative. You clearly have a father in the Bhutanese military, that already makes your story one-sided. Obviously, your father will tell you all the honorable things he do in the military. Every father will of course want to look good in their son/daughter's eyes. All those ugly stuff of course he will fail to mention to you. At least I draw my sources from both sides to get both points of view, whereas you only draw from one-side, which is that of your father's Also, earlier you claimed China is EXPANSIONIST, yet when India is also expanding like when India annexed Sikkim in 1973, you just fail to mention anything about it. Have you actually been to China and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  25369. ​ @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  Anecdotal evidence is when you have a father in the Bhutanese military, that already makes your story one sided. Obviously, your father will tell you all the honorable things he do in the military. Every father will of course want to look good in their son/daughter's eyes. All those ugly stuff of course he will fail to mention to you. At least I draw my sources from both sides to get both points of view, whereas you only draw from one-side, which is that of your father's.
    1
  25370.  @Faceless-Patriote  China doesn't understand Trust? Flip flop? China has settled border dispute with 12 of our land neighbors (see the list of border treaties above). Which of those border treaties has China flip flop on you tell me? China has 14 land neighbors big and small, yet China patiently demarcate every kilometer of territory with 12 of our neighbors and signed border treaty with them. Yet China had 25 border talks with Bhutan, all 25 talks failed to resolve the border dispute with Bhutan. How is the border talk reduced to just_ "give this take that"?_ Why China spend so much time talking with Bhutan if China was as belligerent as you claim China to be? (BTW: China also had 30 border talk with India. All 30 rounds failed to resolve the border dispute.) You said: "No! We know what you want, you want the quickest access to the Ocean" Bhutan is landlocked, how does settling our border dispute with Bhutan grant China the quickest access to the ocean you tell me?
    1
  25371.  makethman574  The so-called "debt trap" of China has been debunked by researchers from the Chatham House. Their research shows that Chinese banks are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country. China has even forgiven 23 interest-free loans for 17 African countries, after already cancelling $3.4 billion and restructuring $15 billion of debt from 2000-2019. How's that for "debt-trap"? As for Tibet, the Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. It should be noted that Tibet was historically part of China since 800 years ago during the Yuan Dynasty. Also, India annexed Sikkim yet Bhutan close one eye and allow Indian embassy, but not a Chinese embassy in Bhutan? Bhutan's population in 1980 was around 415,257 (according to World Bank).
    1
  25372.  @Faceless-Patriote  China doesn't understand Trust? China has settled border dispute with 12 of our land neighbors (see the list of border treaties above). Which of those border treaties has China flip flop on you tell me? China has 14 land neighbors big and small, yet China patiently demarcate every kilometer of territory with 12 of our neighbors and signed border treaty with them. Yet China had 25 border talks with Bhutan, all 25 talks failed to resolve the border dispute with Bhutan. How is the border talk reduced to just "give this take that"? Why China spend so much time talking with Bhutan if China was as aggresive as you claim China to be? You said: "No! We know what you want, you want the quickest access to the Ocean" Bhutan is landlocked, how does settling our border dispute with Bhutan grant China the quickest access to the ocean you tell me?
    1
  25373.  makethman574  What debt trap diplomacy are you talking about? Look, China has even forgiven 23 interest-free loans for 17 African countries, after already cancelling $3.4 billion and restructuring $15 billion of debt from 2000-2019. How's that for "debt-trap"? As for Tibet, the Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. It should be noted that Tibet was historically part of China since 800 years ago during the Yuan Dynasty. Also, India annexed Sikkim yet Bhutan close one eye and allow Indian embassy, but not a Chinese embassy in Bhutan? Bhutan's population in 1980 was around 415,257 (according to World Bank).
    1
  25374.  @Faceless-Patriote  Tajikistan was part of the Russian Empire who made border deals with Britain of which China was not a party to those agreements so the China-Russia boundary remained undefined. When Tajikistan became independent in 1991 it inherited a section of the China-USSR frontier, and it was under negotiation that China and Tajikistan finally demarcated our border. The Tajikistan-China border resolved shows that China is committed to properly demarcating our borders with our land neighbors, both big and small. Yet when it comes to Bhutan, China has had 25 talks with Bhutan and still failed to settle the border dispute. And which of China's border treaties has China flip flop on based on mood? What map scribble by a yak herder are you talking? China provides proper documentation for territorial claims, what else do you base your own territorial claims over? As for the South China Sea, the Vietnamese PM Pham van Dong had acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were part of China in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. The diplomatic note is available on Wikipedia.
    1
  25375.  @kelzangyoeser5133  You said: "The CPEC in Pakistan is a failed project." The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor has created 155,000 jobs in Pakistan and keeps growing after a decade. Multiple highway construction programs are progressing on schedule. Power plants that have entered commercial operation provide nearly one-third of Pakistan's national electricity demand, having changed the situation of power shortage in Pakistan. How is it a failed project?
    1
  25376.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  He's your father, of course he wants to look good in front of his kids, so of course he'll tell all the brave sacrifice that the Bhutanese military did, all while keeping secret the ugly stuff. For example, has your father said in private anything bad about the military that he served? They pay his salary so of course they won't do that. That's the meaning of anecdotal evidence, because it's just one person's story that's all. And which other different source have you mentioned? All you did was mention your father that's all.
    1
  25377.  @Faceless-Patriote  Belonged to the Uighur? The Xinjiang region has been part of China since before Jesus Christ himself was born!. Xinjiang was known in Han Dynasty (200 BC) as Xiyu (西域), meaning "Western Regions". As for the Uighur separatist movement, the name East Turkestan is a term was coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists, including Nikita Bichurin, who intended the name to replace the common Western term for the region, "Chinese Turkestan." It's literally a renaming of actual Chinese territory to remove the word "Chinese" from the name. The diplomatic note was written by the Vietnamese PM Pham van Dong to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, so how is it invalid? You can't refute this point so you suddenly bring up Mongolia? The Mongols once ruled China but they eventually lost it. Also Japan occupied parts of China but did not conqueror all of China, in the end after WWII, the Japanese surrender treaty relinquished all previously occupied territory.
    1
  25378.  @Faceless-Patriote  So India annexed Sikkim ("They did it cunningly too," you admitted) yet when it comes to China you claim it gobbled up Tibet? Tibet was historically part of China 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China, and incorporated those territory into the Yuan Dynasty. Centuries later, the Manchu conquerors did the same thing with Tibet and made it part of Qing Dynasty China. Tibet temporarily broke free of China in 1914, but was eventually reunified with mainland by 1951 with Tibetans signing the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet. So why is it you allow India to have an embassy in Bhutan (even though they annexed Sikkim) while not allowing Chinese embassy? You said: "Why is no Chinese embassy hurting the Chinese ego?" Not hurting, Bhutan is hardly relevant in today's affairs. But Pascal equated Bhutan as leading the rise of Asia, when everybody knows its China that's behind the rise of Asia, and Bhutan has hardly any interactions with China and refuses to ride the waves of progress generated by China.
    1
  25379.  @Faceless-Patriote  So India annexed Sikkim ("They did it cunningly too," you admitted) yet when it comes to China you claim it gobbled up Tibet? Tibet was historically part of China 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered the Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China, and incorporated those territory into the Yuan Dynasty. Centuries later, the Manchu conquerors did the same thing with Tibet and made it part of Qing Dynasty China. Tibet temporarily broke free of China in 1914, but was eventually reunified with mainland by 1951 with Tibetans signing the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet. So why is it you allow India to have an embassy in Bhutan (even though they annexed Sikkim) while not allowing Chinese embassy?
    1
  25380.  @Faceless-Patriote  Have you actually been to Tibet and seen what life is like there for yourself? Previously, Tibet under the 14th Dalai Lama was a brutal theocracy where 95% of the population were slaves, while the remaining 5% were their owners. Life is harsh on the Tibetan plateau, the mountainous soil is infertile, the rainfall scarce, and the slaves had to work hard to grow food to feed the Tibetan population. Poverty and starvation was commonplace, and the punishment for stealing food was amputation. Under the Chinese government, Tibet became more developed with the building of roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, telephone cables etc. Tibetans today have access to all the modern amenities like cars, computers, smartphones, WiFi, online shopping. You can make a purchase online and have it shipped all the way to Lhasa. The world's highest elevation railway connecting Qinghai to Lhasa was built through difficult mountainous terrain, high attitudes and low oxygen environment. Tibetans can now import food from the mainland to feed their population, and the population of Tibet has grown from 1 million in 1951 to 3 million in 2020. In fact, I would say Tibet is arguably the most advanced region in the Himalayas, compared to its neighbors Nepal and Bhutan.
    1
  25381.  @Faceless-Patriote  Have you actually been to Tibet and seen what life is like there for yourself? Previously, Tibet under the 14th Dalai Lama was a brutal theocracy where 95% of the population were slaves, while the remaining 5% were their owners. Life is harsh on the Tibetan plateau and it was difficult to grow food as the mountainous soil is infertile, the rainfall scarce. Poverty and starvation was commonplace, and the punishment for stealing food was amputation. After the central government took control, Tibet became more developed with the building of roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, telephone cables etc. Tibetans today have access to all the modern amenities like cars, computers, smartphones, WiFi, online shopping. You can make a purchase online and have it shipped all the way to Lhasa. The world's highest elevation railway connecting Qinghai to Lhasa was built through difficult mountainous terrain, high attitudes and low oxygen environment. Tibetans can now import food from the mainland to feed their population, and the population of Tibet has grown from 1 million in 1951 to 3 million in 2020. In fact, I would say Tibet is arguably the most advanced region in the Himalayas, compared to its neighbors Nepal and Bhutan.
    1
  25382.  @Faceless-Patriote  Have you actually been to Tibet and seen what life is like there for yourself? Previously, Tibet under the 14th Dalai Lama had 95% of the population being slaves, while the remaining 5% were their owners. Life is harsh on the Tibetan plateau and it was difficult to grow food as the mountainous soil is infertile, the rainfall scarce. Poverty and starvation was commonplace, and the punishment for stealing food was amputation. After the central government took control, Tibet became more developed with the building of roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, telephone cables etc. Tibetans today have access to all the modern amenities like cars, computers, smartphones, WiFi, online shopping. You can make a purchase online and have it shipped all the way to Lhasa. The world's highest elevation railway connecting Qinghai to Lhasa was built through difficult mountainous terrain, high attitudes and low oxygen environment. Tibetans can now import food from the mainland to feed their population, and the population of Tibet has grown from 1 million in 1951 to 3 million in 2020. In fact, I would say Tibet is arguably the most advanced region in the Himalayas, compared to its neighbors Nepal and Bhutan.
    1
  25383.  @Faceless-Patriote  Have you actually been to Tibet and seen what life is like there for yourself? Previous, Tibet under the Dalai Lama was an oppressed region where 95% of the populace were slaves, and the remaining 5% were their owners. Life is harsh on the Tibetan plateau. Poverty and starvation were commonplace and the theft of food was punished by amputation. Whereas under the Chinese government, Tibet became more developed with the building of roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, telephone cables etc. Tibetans today have access to all the modern amenities like cars, computers, smartphones, WiFi, online shopping. You can make a purchase online and have it shipped all the way to Lhasa. The world's highest elevation railway connecting Qinghai to Lhasa was built through difficult mountainous terrain, high attitudes and low oxygen environment. Tibetans can now import food from the mainland to feed their population, and the population of Tibet has grown from 1 million in 1951 to 3 million in 2020. In fact, I would say Tibet is arguably the most advanced region in the Himalayas, compared to its neighbors Nepal and Bhutan.
    1
  25384.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "Who will live long to witness that "return of Hambantota port"? Plenty of people of course. The children's children of people today will reap the benefits of Hambantota port deal after 99 years. Because right now, the Hambantota port is not doing well, that's why it has been leased to Chinese developers to develop, and after 99-years, the lease would have expired and the port returned to Sri Lanka and the debt considered repaid. That's why Sri Lanka benefits from the Hambantota deal in the long run. You said: "The 99 years is so long, who knows China will eat up whole Sri Lanka in the name of development." This is clearly your own speculation without proof. Why would China want to annex Sri Lanka? The people living there are not Chinese and neither was Sri Lanka historically part of China, so why are you making baseless claims in your attempts to malign China? China plays the long-game of course, but China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain. As I've stated, 150 countries have signed on to the Belt and Road Initiative because of the benefits of land-connectivity. I mean, didn't the guest speaker say "Bhutan is not land-locked, it is land-connected."? Yet ironically, Bhutan is not part of BRI, so how exactly is Bhutan going to become land-connected without joining BRI?
    1
  25385.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "Who will live long to witness that "return of Hambantota port"? Plenty of people of course. Because right now, the Hambantota port is not doing well, that's why it has been leased to Chinese developers to develop, and after 99-years, the lease would have expired and the port returned to Sri Lanka and the debt considered repaid. That's why Sri Lanka benefits from the Hambantota deal in the long run. You said: "The 99 years is so long, who knows China will eat up whole Sri Lanka in the name of development." This is clearly your own speculation without proof. Why would China want to annex Sri Lanka? The people living there are not Chinese and neither was Sri Lanka historically part of China, so why are you making baseless claims in your attempts to malign China? China plays the long-game of course, but China seeks win-win cooperation for mutual gain. As I've stated, 150 countries have signed on to the Belt and Road Initiative because of the benefits of land-connectivity. I mean, didn't the guest speaker say "Bhutan is not land-locked, it is land-connected."? Yet ironically, Bhutan is not part of BRI, so how exactly is Bhutan going to become land-connected without joining BRI?
    1
  25386.  @kelzangyoeser5133  Looks like you can't refute my point of how CPEC creates jobs for Pakistani, so you just label me a bot, just because my views happen to differ from that of yours.
    1
  25387.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  The Five Fingers Policy is commonly attributed to Mao Zedong, but there is no evidence he actually coined the policy, nor is it an official public policy. It was thought to originate in 1908 during the Qing Dynasty by an ambassador to Nepalese authorities on "being united like brothers under the auspices of China, should work in harmony for mutual good." in the face of British Imperialism of South Asia. The term "liberate" in this case was meant to free those regions from British control. Because just as how India had been politically captured by the British in the 19th century, Bhutan has been politically captured by India today. How can Bhutan be considered a sovereign country when India is allowed to dictate Bhutan's foreign policy? If Bhutan truly want's to be a neutral country, they would allow embassies from both India and China, instead of allowing Indian embassy (despite the annexation of Sikkim) and not the Chinese embassy.
    1
  25388.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "it still doesn’t matter if Lhasa has seen so much development and have access to all modern amenities with out the freedom." What makes you think Tibetans lack freedom? Earlier you've admitted that India annexed Sikkim ("They did it cunningly too," you said), but you turn a blind eye to Sikkim whereas when it comes to Tibet being part of China, you support Tibetan separatism. So why don't you do support Sikkim "freedom" from India while you're at it, instead you only continue to target mainland China because of Tibet, then who do you think you are?
    1
  25389.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "Who knows Tibet may become free again and China may get an embassy in Thimphu." Life has improved greatly for the Tibetans under mainland Chinese governance. It's those overseas Tibetans that seek to "Free Tibet" but what makes you think they represent the Tibetans in Tibet? Those overseas were the 5% of Tibet's population under the Dalai Lama that owned slaves. Funny how you talk about "kicking out the traitors, those 100000 you are talking about," from Bhutan, yet here you are endorsing the view of those overseas Tibetans, instead of the actual Tibetans living in Tibet. The 14th Dalai Lama, was in fact, a traitor to his people, having accepted American money to carry out separatist activities in Tibet against the central Chinese government. We know this from actual declassified CIA files, which have revealed that a total of 1,735,000 USD (equivalent to $17,044,700 in 2023) was devoted to the Tibetan program for 1964. This is actual proof of foreign interference in China's internal affairs in Tibet.
    1
  25390.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "@ sounds like excuses" India annexed Sikkim, yet you refuse to discuss anything about Sikkim's annexation, instead you constantly single out China because Tibet was reincorporated back into the mainland, then who is the one making excuses here? You turn a blind eye to India's activities, instead you prioritize India's safety concerns, then it shows that Bhutan has been politically captured by India that's all. No sovereignty of its own when Bhutan allows India to dictate its foreign policies. Also, you keep on claiming "back off Doklam.( what gain is it for a mighty China? Fighting for a small rugged 89 square km of inhabitable barren land)" and "For a Nation as big as China, why does such a small piece of land matters so much?" yet it's Doklam isn't even part of India, it's located on the China-Bhutan border, not the China-India border. Yet you never ask why for such a big country like India, why they care about Bhutan's border with China?
    1
  25391.  @kelzangyoeser5133  "So your probably a bot. Change of instruction. Write the ingredients of Ema datshi." Looks like I saw your post wrongly. It shows that I am human after all if I can accidentally misread comments yet why'd you jump to the conclusion that I'm a bot? A bot won't be misreading comments so why are you hurling such an accusation against me?
    1
  25392.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "Yes, due to CPEC there are huge jobs creation at Pakistan with high inflations, internal chaos, IMF bailouts" Have you forgotten that Pakistan was hit by severe floods in 2022? Sadly, those floods killed thousands of people in Pakistan and caused about US$40 billion in damage. How can you claim that Pakistan's need for bailout was because of CPEC? It's possible that had those floods not happen, Pakistan might not need to resort to bailout.
    1
  25393.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "You said "Why would China want to annex Sri Lanka?" Are you serious? 😆 Do you think you are only one who knows "geopolitics"? and please keep that "Western" blame game away" Let's get this straight, it's only one port in Hambantota that was leased to Chinese companies to develop for 99 years, not the entire country of Sri Lanka. Yet you're making it out as if China want the entire country. For what? You said "dominance over Indian ocean, power expansion" well China doesn't have to annex the entire country of Sri Lanka to do that. China can achieve those goals simply by developing Sri Lanka ports, what's the point of annexing Sri Lanka? What's China going to do with the people of Sri Lanka after annexation? Teach those people to be Chinese when Sri Lanka was never historically part of China? Also it means China would have to take care of another 22 million people in Sri Lanka as well as raise their living standards, so how does it make sense for China to annex Sri Lanka? All those dominance over Indian Ocean can be achieved just by developing Sri Lanka's port, why annex the whole country? You said: "All I would say, CCP got lots of patience and far sighted dream." Firstly, it's called the CPC, not the CCP. Because the name of the party in Chinese is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) in which Zhōngguó 中国 means China (i.e The Middle Kingdom) so the proper name is the CPC, not CCP. Secondly, of course the CPC has lots of patience and foresight, unlike you who only sees the absolute worst of China. Meanwhile, India annexed Sikkim and you turn a blind eye to it, and even now, India is eyeing Pakistan's territory of Kashmir, yet you're making China out to be the expansionist.
    1
  25394.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "You said "Why would China want to annex Sri Lanka?" Are you serious? 😆 Do you think you are only one who knows "geopolitics"? and please keep that "Western" blame game away" Let's get this straight, it's only one port in Hambantota that was leased to Chinese companies to develop for 99 years, not the entire country of Sri Lanka. Yet you're making it out as if China want the entire country. For what? You said "dominance over Indian ocean, power expansion" well China doesn't have to annex the entire country of Sri Lanka to do that. China can achieve those goals simply by developing Sri Lanka ports, what's the point of annexing Sri Lanka? What's China going to do with the people of Sri Lanka after annexation? Teach those people to be Chinese when Sri Lanka was never historically part of China? Also it means China would have to take care of another 22 million people in Sri Lanka as well as raise their living standards, so how does it make sense for China to annex Sri Lanka? All those dominance over Indian Ocean can be achieved just by developing Sri Lanka's port, why annex the whole country? You said: "All I would say, CCP got lots of patience and far sighted dream." Of course the CPC has lots of patience and foresight, unlike you who only sees the absolute worst of China. Meanwhile, India annexed Sikkim and you turn a blind eye to it, and even now, India is eyeing Pakistan's territory of Kashmir, yet you're making China out to be the expansionist.
    1
  25395.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "You said "Why would China want to annex Sri Lanka?" Are you serious? 😆 Do you think you are only one who knows "geopolitics"? and please keep that "Western" blame game away" Let's get this straight, it's only one port in Hambantota that was leased to Chinese companies to develop for 99 years, not the entire country of Sri Lanka. Yet you're making it out as if China want the entire country. For what? You said "dominance over Indian ocean, power expansion" well China doesn't have to annex the entire country of Sri Lanka to do that. China can achieve those goals simply by developing Sri Lanka ports, what's the point of annexing Sri Lanka? What's China going to do with the people of Sri Lanka after annexation? Teach those people to be Chinese when Sri Lanka was never historically part of China? Also it means China would have to take care of another 22 million people in Sri Lanka as well as raise their living standards, so how does it make sense for China to annex Sri Lanka? All those dominance over Indian Ocean can be achieved just by developing Sri Lanka's port, why annex the whole country? You said: "All I would say, CCP got lots of patience and far sighted dream." Because the fact remains that even after 99 years, there will still be plenty of people around.
    1
  25396.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "Try reclaiming the territory that was taken by Russia (don't say you don't have that issue)." It's true that Russia today holds parts of what was historically part China, like Vladivostok, which is known as Haishenwai during Qing Dynasty and Yongmingcheng during Yuan Dynasty. It's because China and Russia see ourselves as partners and patiently demarcate each and every kilometer of our border. If anything, it shows China is willing to relinquish territorial claims if necessary in order to achieve harmony with our neighbors. You said: "China can reclaim their territory only with weak and small country... What a irony!" If China could bully the smaller and weaker countries, then why China hold 25 rounds of border talks with Bhutan? Yet all 25 talks with Bhutan ended in failure to reach a resolution, even though China already settled border with Russia, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan... and 8 other land neighbors. Why China spend so much time just to settle the border with Bhutan? It's because China sees Bhutan as a partner. But it's because Bhutan has been politically captured by India, therefore they have no sovereignty of their own, since they allow India to dictate Bhutan's foreign policy.
    1
  25397.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "same same but difalant embay" India annexed Sikkim, yet why are both of you deliberately ignoring this fact? Why Bhutan allow India embassy even though Sikkim was annexed, but no embassy for China just because Tibet is reunified with the mainland?
    1
  25398.  @kelzangyoeser5133  If Bhutan thinks not having embassies among the P5 nations is being neutral, then why not Bhutan remove India's embassy as well? Then Bhutan will be neutral among both its neighbors India and China, yet Bhutan allows Indian embassy but not Chinese embassy.
    1
  25399.  @kelzangyoeser5133  China will only withdraw from the security council if the other P5 nations agree to a withdrawal as well. Otherwise, China is an important member of the P5, because its a non-Western nation, unlike USA, UK and French. China together with Russia represent a different voice of the P5, otherwise the West would have gotten their way all the time in the UNSC. As for China's border dispute with Bhutan, like I told the other guy, China has settled border disputes with 12 out of 14 land neighbors (the most number of land neighbors in the world, tied with Russia). Here's the list again: -In 1915, Tajikistan and China signed border treaty -In 1960, Myanmar and China signed border treaty -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed border treaty. -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed border treaty. -In 1963, Nepal and China signed border treaty. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border treaty. -In 1964, North Korea and China signed border treaty. -In 1991, Soviet Union and China signed border treaty. -In 1992, Laos and China signed border treaty. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border treaty. -In 1996, Kyrgyzstan and China signed border treaty. -In 1999, Vietnam and China signed border treaty. Only India and Bhutan have yet to settle the borders with China. China has had 25 rounds of border talks with Bhutan, and all 25 talks failed to resolve the border issue. Same goes for India, China has had 30 rounds of border talks with India, all failed to resolve the border dispute.
    1
  25400.  @Faceless-Patriote  Sikkim is not the only state that's annexed by India. India also annexed Goa, Manipur, Nagaland, Tripura, Jammu & Kashmir and so many other smaller states. There are ongoing separatist movements in these regions, such as Goa Liberation Movement, Manipur Insurgency, Nagaland Insurgency, National Liberation Front of Tripura, J&K, but you convenient close one eye to them. You said: "Tibetans want a seperate country and they deserve it and who am I? I am just an ordinary Bhutanese." Only those overseas Tibetans desire want a separate country, not the Tibetans currently living in Tibet. As I've stated earlier, Tibet under the Dalai Lama was an oppressed region where 95% of the populace were slaves, and the remaining 5% were their owners. Those overseas were the 5% of Tibet's population under the Dalai Lama that owned slaves, and now they want a separate country. Also, I've brought up the fact that 14th Dalai Lama accepted American money to carry out separatist activities in Tibet against the central Chinese government. We know this from actual declassified CIA files, which have revealed that a total of 1,735,000 USD (equivalent to $17,044,700 in 2023) was devoted to the Tibetan program for 1964. This is actual proof of foreign interference in China's internal affairs in Tibet. You're just an ordinary Bhutanese but are you aware of these US sponsored separatist activities I brought up?
    1
  25401.  @Faceless-Patriote  Sikkim is not the only state that's annexed by India. India also annexed Goa, Manipur, Nagaland, Tripura, Jammu & Kashmir and so many other smaller states. There are ongoing separatist movements in these regions, such as Goa Liberation Movement, Manipur Insurgency, Nagaland Insurgency, National Liberation Front of Tripura, J&K, but you conveniently turn a blind eye to them. You said: "Tibetans want a seperate country and they deserve it and who am I? I am just an ordinary Bhutanese." Who are you as ordinary Bhutanese to call for separatism in China? I've already given you proof of the Dalai Lama accepting American money to carry out separatist activities against the central Chinese government, how can you say the Tibetans want a separate country when the separatist movement has been artificially introduced by the US? The truth is that you don't care about Tibetans, have you actually talked to the Tibetans LIVING IN Tibet in the first place?
    1
  25402.  @Faceless-Patriote  Tibet is now properly incorporated into China, after the 1951 signing of the Seventeen Point Agreement (signed by the Tibetans themselves). So there's this legally binding agreement that Tibet is part of China, even in the Map of China, Tibet is depicted as being part of China. Also, there is no separatist movement inside Tibet. It's the overseas Tibetans that are separatist, having accepted American money. Tell me, what is the 14th Dalai Lama living in exile doing for his people, compared to what the Chinese government has done to develop Tibet? You said: "A Chinese will not understand this relationship because you don’t have such experience, this is very new to you we know that." Yes of course, China will never let some foreign power dictate China's own foreign policy, unlike Bhutan allowing India to dictate theirs. That's why China is sovereign, whereas Bhutan isn't. A friendship treaty means both partners treat each other as equals, whereas Bhutan has been politically captured by India. You keep saying for mighty China, why does such a small piece of land matters so much? Because Doklam is part of China-Bhutan border, and as long as our border remains not demarcated, China will always be concerned since how will our border patrol know the edge of our boundary to patrol? On the other hand, have you asked yourself why such a big country like India care about Doklam, when Doklam is not even part of India's territory?
    1
  25403.  @Faceless-Patriote  You haven't answered my question: "Have you actually been to Tibet and seen what life is like there for yourself?" The first Tibetan colleges were built in Lhasa after 1951 by the Chinese government, including Tibet University. Have you heard of the famous Tibetan singer Alan (阿蘭)? She has sung songs in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Yet you're claiming the Tibetans lack freedom? Because you only listen to those overseas Tibetans that fled because they were the 5% that owned slaves during the Dalai Lama period in Tibet?
    1
  25404.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "yes that true, I have not been to Tibet yet but I will say again that the Tibetan are not free..." So you've never been to Tibet then how can you claim the people aren't free? I've already mentioned how the Tibet was oppressed previously under the Dalai Lama, that 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% were their owners. It's those 5% that fled Tibet that are calling for a separate country, and it's been shown that they've accepted money. Look thorough those declassified CIA files on the Tibetan Program to see what I mean.
    1
  25405.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "I am here to Defend Bhutan. You started this thread on a video that’s talking about Bhutan. Why then do you want us to talk about China." Can't I talk about China? You can defend Bhutan then why can't I defend China? This video by Pascal claims that it's Bhutan that's leading the unstoppable rise of Asia. But everyone knows it's China that's leading the rise of Asia, and Bhutan has hardly any interactions with China, so how is Bhutan qualified to lead? In fact, Pascal's questions posed to the guest were basically all about Bhutan's interaction with China, so why can't I talk about China? Did you watch the video in the first place?
    1
  25406.  @Faceless-Patriote  Demarcate the Border? What'd you think China has been doing all this while? China has had 25 rounds border talks with Bhutan, all 25 talks ended in failure to resolve the border. Had Bhutan been truly sovereign, then the China-Bhutan border would have been demarcated long ago. But it's because Bhutan has been politically captured by India, that's why China-Bhutan border talks ended in failure. Doklam is on the China-Bhutan border, not the China-India border, so why India care about it's neighbor's border?
    1
  25407.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "India guarantees Bhutan’s sovereignty. We expect the same from China in the future." India annexed the territories of Sikkim, Goa, Manipur, Nagaland, Tripura, Jammu & Kashmir, yet you trust India's word over China's? Even now, you refuse to discuss the separatist movements in India, while still claiming that the Tibetans deserve independence (even though you've never been to Tibet). Yet you're painting China as being aggressive, even though China sit down patiently through 25 rounds of border talks to demarcate every kilometer of territory on the Bhutan-China border. You said: "You also need to understand that we are very small in size so a walk pass by the PLA at our border is a legitimate concern for us," So let China and Bhutan agree to demarcate the border then! Draw up a boundary that's acceptable to both sides, so that the PLA soldiers know where is the actual border to patrol. Otherwise, with the border not demarcated, then PLA soldiers won't know to which extent to patrol the border, since it's not demarcated. But it's because Bhutan has been politically captured by India, that's why it's Bhutan and China failed to resolve the border dispute, even after 25 attempts.
    1
  25408.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "Tibetans cannot even hang a picture of the Dalai Lama inside Tibet," Because the Dalai Lama was a traitor to his people. He's a sellout and an agent of the CIA, having accepted American money in order to carry out separatist activities against the central Chinese government. Like I said earlier, look up those declassified CIA files on the Tibetan Program. A total of 1,735,000 USD (equivalent to $17,044,700 in 2023) was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964. The 14th Dalai Lama was paid a whopping $180, 000 a year from the USA between the late 1950s and the mid-1970. One document noted that many Asian nations were not willing to sponsoring Tibetan case at the UN. or even the possibility of granting asylum for the Dalai Lama. Why then should China allow Tibetans to hang a picture of someone who receives foreign money to engage in separatism?
    1
  25409.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "Tibetans cannot even hang a picture of the Dalai Lama inside Tibet," Because the Dalai Lama was a traitor to his people. In fact, he's an agent of the CIA, having accepted American money in order to carry out separatist activities against the central Chinese government. Like I said earlier, look up those declassified files on the Tibetan Program. A total of 1,735,000 USD (equivalent to $17,044,700 in 2023) was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964. The 14th Dalai Lama was paid a whopping $180, 000 a year from the USA between the late 1950s and the mid-1970. One document noted that many Asian nations were not willing to sponsoring Tibetan case at the UN. or even the possibility of granting asylum for the Dalai Lama. Why then should China allow Tibetans to hang a picture of someone who receives foreign money to engage in separatism?
    1
  25410.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "Tibetans cannot even hang a picture of the Dalai Lama inside Tibet," Because the 14th Dalai Lama was in fact, a traitor to his people, having accepted American money in order to carry out separatist activities against the central Chinese government. Like I said earlier, look up those declassified files on the Tibetan Program. A total of 1,735,000 USD (equivalent to $17,044,700 in 2023) was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964. The 14th Dalai Lama received a salary of $180, 000 a year from the USA and one document noted that many Asian nations were not willing to sponsoring Tibetan case at the UN. or even the possibility of granting asylum for the Dalai Lama. Why then should China allow Tibetans to hang a picture of someone who receives foreign money to engage in separatism? Earlier you talk about Bhutan kicking out 100,000 traitors, why don't Bhutan hang pictures of all those traitors then?
    1
  25411.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "Tibetans cannot even hang a picture of the Dalai Lama inside Tibet," I've already explained many times. The 14th Dalai Lama accepted American money in order to carry out separatist activities against the central Chinese government. Like I said earlier, look up those declassified files on the Tibetan Program. A total of 1,735,000 USD (equivalent to $17,044,700 in 2023) was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964. The 14th Dalai Lama received a salary of $180, 000 a year from the USA. Why then should China allow Tibetans to hang a picture of someone who receives foreign money to engage in separatism? I've given you so much evidence, you just overlook them that's all and claim Tibetans are oppressed (without actually having been to Tibet yourself)
    1
  25412.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "Tibetans cannot even hang a picture of the Dalai Lama inside Tibet," Because he accepted American money in order to carry out separatist activities against the central Chinese government. Like I said earlier, look up those declassified files on the Tibetan Program. A total of 1,735,000 USD (equivalent to $17,044,700 in 2023) was devoted to the Tibetan program in 1964 and according to those documents, the 14th Dalai Lama received a salary of $180, 000 a year from the USA. Why then should China allow Tibetans to hang a picture of someone who receives foreign money to engage in separatism? Earlier you talk about Bhutan kicking out 100,000 traitors, why don't Bhutan hang pictures of all those traitors then?
    1
  25413.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "Tibetans cannot even hang a picture of the Dalai Lama inside Tibet," Because the 14th Dalai Lama was in fact, a traitor to his people, having accepted American money in order to carry out separatist activities against the central Chinese government. Like I said earlier, look up those declassified files on the Tibetan Program. The 14th Dalai Lama received a salary of $180, 000 a year from the USA, so why then should China allow Tibetans to hang a picture of someone who receives foreign money to engage in separatism? Earlier you talk about Bhutan kicking out 100,000 traitors, why don't Bhutan hang pictures of all those traitors then?
    1
  25414.  @Faceless-Patriote  "Tibetans cannot even hang a picture of the Dalai Lama inside Tibet," Why should China allow Tibetans to hang a picture of someone who receives foreign money to engage in separatism? He was a traitor to his people having accepted American money in order to carry out separatist activities against the central Chinese government. Like I said earlier, look up those declassified files on the Tibetan Program. A total of 1,735,000 USD (equivalent to $17,044,700 in 2023) was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964. The 14th Dalai Lama was paid a whopping $180, 000 a year from the USA.
    1
  25415.  @Faceless-Patriote  Why should China allow Tibetans to hang a picture of someone who receives foreign money to engage in separatism? He was a traitor to his people having accepted American money in order to carry out separatist activities against the central Chinese government. Like I said earlier, look up those declassified files on the Tibetan Program. A total of 1,735,000 USD (equivalent to $17,044,700 in 2023) was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964. The 14th Dalai Lama was paid a whopping $180, 000 a year from the USA.
    1
  25416.  @Faceless-Patriote  "@ what can Dalai Lama do from Exile? Tibetans cannot even hang a picture of the Dalai Lama inside Tibet" The Dalai Lama in exile still holds talks in other countries in order to convince people to support the Tibetan separatism. And why should China allow Tibetans to hang a picture of someone who receives foreign money to engage in separatism? The Dalai Lama spends so much money holding talks (who's sponsoring him?) but what exactly has he done for the Tibetan people, that people should hang a portrait of him?
    1
  25417.  @Faceless-Patriote  "what can Dalai Lama do from Exile? Tibetans cannot even hang a picture of the Dalai Lama inside Tibet," He's proven to be a fraud, having accepted American money to carry out separatist activities in Tibet, why should Tibetans hang a picture of him? What "spiritual leader" receiving $180,000 a year from the US government?
    1
  25418.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "Do you think, the cat wont eat a meat that is been placed in front of that cat? Do you think the world is fool?" China is not a cat, what's the point of your comparison? You're unable to refute my points, so you make pointless analogies comparing animals to countries? How's the world a fool when 150 countries have signed on to China's Belt and Road Initiative? Those 150 countries can see the benefits to joining China's BRI. You said: "Getting a control over that "Hambantota port" for 99 years means, you going to control that trade route of Indian Ocean" So you admit all that's needed is a good port that can facilitate maritime trade over the Indian Ocean, how doesn't that equate to annexing the entire country of Sri Lanka? I'm talking about developing a port, whereas you're equating it to the entire country of Sri Lanka! Also, it doesn't matter who controls the port, as long as the port is operable, so had China wanted to take over the port, why did China sign a lease of 99 years, after which Hambantota port would be returned to Sri Lanka and the debt considered repaid at the end of the lease?
    1
  25419.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "Do you think, the cat wont eat a meat that is been placed in front of that cat? Do you think the world is fool?" China is not a cat, what's the point of your comparison? You're unable to refute my points, so you make redundant analogies comparing animals to countries? And 150 countries have signed on to China's Belt and Road Initiative, how does that make the world a fool? You said: "Getting a control over that "Hambantota port" for 99 years means, you going to control that trade route of Indian Ocean" So you admit all that's needed is a good port that can facilitate maritime trade over the Indian Ocean, how doesn't that equate to annexing the entire country of Sri Lanka? I'm talking about developing a port, whereas you're equating it to the entire country of Sri Lanka! Also, it doesn't matter who controls the port, as long as the port is operable, so had China wanted to take over the port, why did China sign a lease, after which Hambantota port would be returned to Sri Lanka and the debt considered repaid after 99 years?
    1
  25420.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "and keep EYE on your great competitor "INDIA". " China's greatest competitor is the United States of America, NOT India. The current geopolitical climate of the world clearly reflects this, why would China be concerned about India as a competitor? You said: "China can achieve those goals simply by developing Sri Lanka ports, ..." clearly shows what was the intention of taking over "Hambantota port"." I clearly wrote developing Sri Lanka ports, and it seems you twisted my words to mean taking over Hambantota port, which is not the same. Once the lease expires, the port will be returned to Sri Lanka and the debt considered repaid. Also, the goal is trade dominance over the India Ocean, and even now, Chinese trade dominates the Indian Ocean You said: ".. you would fulfill the "FREE Labour" like you have been doing with "Tibetan" people and some Muslim people" Explain which Tibetan people and Muslim people are being used for free labor in China. In Tibet, the average monthly before tax salary for a full-time Tibetan worker was 9,733 CNY or 1,360 USD or 1,260 EUR or 1,080 GBP, how's that free labor? Tibetan workers work in a wide variety of occupations 1. Agriculture and Herding: Many Tibetans engage in traditional livelihoods such as farming, animal husbandry, and yak herding. They may earn income from the sale of agricultural products, meat, and dairy. 2. Tourism: Tourism is a significant industry in Tibet, and many people work in jobs related to the tourism sector, including as tour guides, hotel staff, and transportation providers. They earn salaries from these positions. 3. Government Employment: Some Tibetans work in various government positions, including administrative roles, education, and healthcare, and receive government salaries. 4. Business and Trade: Like in other regions, individuals may run their own businesses or engage in trade activities, earning income from these ventures. 5. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs): Some people in Tibet may work for NGOs or international organizations operating in the region, earning salaries for their work. 6. Education and Research: There are educational institutions and research centers in Tibet, and individuals involved in teaching or research can earn salaries. I mean, have you even been to Tibet and seen what life is like here for yourself? ... You said: "Yes there will be plenty of people around but not the normal people, there will be a people who's brain will be filled with CCP propaganda as I said," It's people like you today who's brain is filled with anti-China propaganda. Every word coming out of you demonizes China to the point of inhumanity, even though Chinese people can be found all over the world, as Chinese tourists, Chinese international students, and so on. Yet it appears you are determined to believe the absolute worst of China that's all.
    1
  25421.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "and keep EYE on your great competitor "INDIA". " China's greatest competitor is the United States of America, NOT India. The current geopolitical climate of the world clearly reflects this, why would China be concerned about India as a competitor? You said: "China can achieve those goals simply by developing Sri Lanka ports, ..." clearly shows what was the intention of taking over "Hambantota port"." I clearly wrote developing Sri Lanka ports, and it seems you twisted my words to mean taking over Hambantota port, which is not the same. Once the lease expires, the port will be returned to Sri Lanka and the debt considered repaid. Also, the goal is trade dominance over the India Ocean, and even now, Chinese trade dominates the Indian Ocean You said: ".. you would fulfill the "FREE Labour" like you have been doing with "Tibetan" people and some Muslim people" Explain which Tibetan people and Muslim people are being used for free labor in China. In Tibet, the average monthly before tax salary for a full-time Tibetan worker was 9,733 CNY or 1,360 USD or 1,260 EUR or 1,080 GBP, how's that free labor? I mean, have you even been to Tibet and seen what life is like here for yourself? ... You said: "Yes there will be plenty of people around but not the normal people, there will be a people who's brain will be filled with CCP propaganda as I said," It's people like you today who's brain is filled with all things anti-China. Every word coming out of you demonizes China to the point of inhumanity, even though Chinese people can be found all over the world, as Chinese tourists, Chinese international students, and so on. Yet it appears you are determined to believe the absolute worst of China that's all.
    1
  25422.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "and keep EYE on your great competitor "INDIA". " China's greatest competitor is the United States of America, NOT India. The current geopolitical climate of the world clearly reflects this, why would China be concerned about India as a competitor? You said: "China can achieve those goals simply by developing Sri Lanka ports, ..." clearly shows what was the intention of taking over "Hambantota port"." I clearly wrote developing Sri Lanka ports, and it seems you twisted my words to mean taking over Hambantota port, which is not the same. Once the lease expires, the port will be returned to Sri Lanka and the debt considered repaid. Also, the goal is trade dominance over the India Ocean, and even now, Chinese trade dominates the Indian Ocean You said: ".. you would fulfill the "FREE Labour" like you have been doing with "Tibetan" people and some Muslim people" Explain which Tibetan people and Muslim people are being used for free labor in China. In Tibet, the average monthly before tax salary for a full-time Tibetan worker was 9,733 CNY or 1,360 USD or 1,260 EUR or 1,080 GBP, how's that free labor? I mean, have you even been to Tibet and seen what life is like here for yourself? ... You said: "Yes there will be plenty of people around but not the normal people, there will be a people who's brain will be filled with CCP propaganda as I said," After 99 years, Sri Lanka's Hambantota port would be far more developed than it is today, then how's it a bad thing for the people of Sri Lanka? Furthermore after 99 years the lease would have expired and the port returned back to Sri Lanka, so it benefits Sri Lanka in the long term. That's the visionary plan shared by China and Sri Lanka, not the short-sightedness that's you've displayed so far.
    1
  25423.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "and keep EYE on your great competitor "INDIA". " China's greatest competitor is the United States of America, NOT India. The current geopolitical climate of the world clearly reflects this, why would China be concerned about India as a competitor? You said: "China can achieve those goals simply by developing Sri Lanka ports, ..." clearly shows what was the intention of taking over "Hambantota port"." I clearly wrote developing Sri Lanka ports, and it seems you twisted my words to mean taking over Hambantota port, which is not the same. Once the lease expires, the port will be returned to Sri Lanka and the debt considered repaid. Also, the goal is trade dominance over the India Ocean, and even now, Chinese trade dominates the Indian Ocean You said: ".. you would fulfill the "FREE Labour" like you have been doing with "Tibetan" people and some Muslim people" Explain which Tibetan people and Muslim people are being used for free labor in China. In Tibet, the average monthly before tax salary for a full-time Tibetan worker was 9,733 CNY or 1,360 USD or 1,260 EUR or 1,080 GBP, how's that free labor? I mean, have you even been to Tibet and seen what life is like here for yourself?
    1
  25424.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  "Yes there will be plenty of people around but not the normal people, there will be a people who's brain will be filled with CCP propaganda as I said CCP has far visionary plan and lots of patience......" After 99 years, Sri Lanka's Hambantota port would be far more developed than it is today, then how's it a bad thing for the people of Sri Lanka? Furthermore after 99 years the lease would have expired and the port returned back to Sri Lanka, so it benefits Sri Lanka in the long term. That's the visionary plan shared by China and Sri Lanka, not the short-sightedness that's you've displayed so far.
    1
  25425.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  "Yes there will be plenty of people around but not the normal people, there will be a people who's brain will be filled with... CCP has far visionary plan and lots of patience......"_ After 99 years, Sri Lanka's Hambantota port would be far more developed than it is today, then how's it a bad thing for the people of Sri Lanka? Furthermore after 99 years the lease would have expired and the port returned back to Sri Lanka, so it benefits Sri Lanka in the long term. That's the visionary plan shared by China and Sri Lanka, not the short-sightedness that's you've displayed so far.
    1
  25426.  makethman574  You said: "Your ignorance to the fact that Sikkim power transfer was clean and wanted by the people" Sikkim isn't the only state that's annexed by India. India also annexed Goa, Manipur, Nagaland, Tripura, Jammu & Kashmir and so many other smaller states. There are ongoing separatist movements in these regions, such as Goa Liberation Movement, Manipur Insurgency, Nagaland Insurgency, National Liberation Front of Tripura, J&K, You said: "whereas the hundreds and thousands of people that died and fled Tibet because of the CCP is enough for me to know your stance. Tibet was a brotherly nation and was forcibly conquered by China" Tibet was historically part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered both the Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated them both into Yuan Dynasty. Centuries later, Manchu conquerors did the same and made Tibet part of Qing Dynasty. Tibet briefly broke free of China in 1912 (during Chinese Civil War) but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951. The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement acknowledging Chinese rule over Tibet and countries all over the world recognize Tibet as part of China However, previously, Tibet under the Dalai Lama was an oppressed region where 95% of the populace were slaves, and the remaining 5% were their owners. Life is harsh on the Tibetan plateau. Poverty and starvation were commonplace and the theft of food was punished by amputation. Whereas under the Chinese government, Tibet became more developed with the building of roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, telephone cables etc. Tibetans today have access to all the modern amenities like cars, computers, smartphones, WiFi, online shopping. You can make a purchase online and have it shipped all the way to Lhasa. The world's highest elevation railway connecting Qinghai to Lhasa was built through difficult mountainous terrain, high attitudes and low oxygen environment. Tibetans can now import food from the mainland to feed their population, and the population of Tibet has grown from 1 million in 1951 to 3 million in 2020. In fact, I would say Tibet is arguably the most advanced region in the Himalayas, compared to its neighbors Nepal and Bhutan.
    1
  25427.  makethman574  "your issues in the Uyghur region + Hong Kong and your claim over Taiwan is enough and well known not only in Bhutan but around the world" Xinjiang was part of China since before Jesus Christ himself was born, and was known in Han Dynasty (220 BC) as Xiyu (西域), meaning "Western Regions" . Older English-language reference works often refer to the area as Chinese Turkestan or Chinese Turkistan, whereas the name "East Turkestan" is a false name coined in the 19th century by Russian Turkologists, who intended the name to replace the common Western term for the region, "Chinese Turkestan", The truth is that Xinjiang was always part of China despite foreign attempts to rename the region. Hong Kong was part of China before it was taken by the British in the aftermath of the Opium Wars. Yet even after the 1997 return of Hong Kong, the British still sought to influence Hong Kong's political system towards democracy (even though Hong Kong never enjoyed democracy for 150 years prior as a British colony) Yet China was flexible enough to allow 1 Country, 2 Systems to allow Hong Kong to keep their system and for mainland China to keep ours. In most other cases, the returned territory adopts the political system of the motherland, whereas China made an exception and allowed Hong Kong to keep their separate government, their elections, their own currency, even their own HK passport. This is almost unheard of in today's society. As for Taiwan, during the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang lost the mainland to the CPC and fled to Taiwan island in which they claim to be the real China, i.e the Republic of China. Since Taiwan can claim all of mainland China, then can't mainland China do the same to the island?
    1
  25428.  makethman574  You said: "I do not know how you can compare China's freewill to Bhutan with Chinas reputation around the world for oppressing its people" What makes you think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists, visiting your lands and spending coin on tourism. Or Chinese international students in your schools and universities, studying the same topics as their local peers. Haven't you talked to a Chinese person in your vicinity? In comparison, how many people have ever heard of Bhutanese? You said: "Also Bhutan has multiple Embassies Thailand , Kuwait , Bangladesh etc in Bhutan as do our links around the world." Bhutan has 6 embassies and 3 consulates whereas China hosts 176 embassies. Chinese people can be found all over the world, as tourists, international students, workers, etc, since Chinese people literally make up 20% of the world's entire population. You said: "? "HOW IRONIC" that YouTube is banned in China to make sure the Chinese do not spew their words on the internet." Who said YouTube is banned in China? Nobody will arrest you just for login into YT while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so? Chinese vlogger Li Ziqi broke the Guinness World Record in 2021 for "The most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube." As of January 2024, she had over 18 million subscribers, yet you're saying YT is banned in China? As for the Internet, China literally has the highest number of Internet users in the world so what makes you think Chinese aren't talking on the Internet?
    1
  25429.  @Faceless-Patriote  What's so petty about defending China? Earlier You proclaim that you are here to defend Bhutan, but all you're doing is highlighting how politically captured Bhutan is under India. Demarcate the border? China has had 25 rounds of border talks with Bhutan, all 25 talks ended in failure! You ignore India annexing Sikkim Goa, Manipur, Nagaland, Tripura, Jammu & Kashmir, while continuing to harp on Tibet rejoining mainland China. The 14th Dalai Lama? Look at the declassified CIA files for the Tibetan Program, and he received $180,000 a year from the American CIA, so why hang a picture of the 14th Dalai Lama?
    1
  25430.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  Lol, you yourself wrote the word "visionary," don't tell me you forgotten what word you used? And the word "expansionist" can be used to describe India annexing Sikkim, Goa, Manipur, Nagaland, Tripura, Jammu & Kashmir (but you refuse to even comment on India annexing those states). As for Tibet, it was historically part of China since 800 years ago when the Mongols conquered both the Kingdom of Tibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated them both into Yuan Dynasty. Centuries later, Manchu conquerors did the same and made Tibet part of Qing Dynasty. Tibet briefly broke free of China in 1912 (during Chinese Civil War) but was eventually reunified with the mainland by 1951. The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement acknowledging Chinese rule over Tibet and countries all over the world recognize Tibet as part of China However, previously, Tibet under the Dalai Lama was an oppressed region where 95% of the populace were slaves, and the remaining 5% were their owners. Life is harsh on the Tibetan plateau. Poverty and starvation were commonplace and the theft of food was punished by amputation. Whereas under the Chinese government, Tibet became more developed with the building of roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, telephone cables etc. Tibetans today have access to all the modern amenities like cars, computers, smartphones, WiFi, online shopping. You can make a purchase online and have it shipped all the way to Lhasa. The world's highest elevation railway connecting Qinghai to Lhasa was built through difficult mountainous terrain, high attitudes and low oxygen environment. Tibetans can now import food from the mainland to feed their population, and the population of Tibet has grown from 1 million in 1951 to 3 million in 2020. In fact, I would say Tibet is arguably the most advanced region in the Himalayas, compared to its neighbors Nepal and Bhutan. You said: "Wish people of current generation could live beyond 90 years so that we can witness the CCP's development." Yes, they will witness how Sri Lanka transformed from a previously impoverished country into an economic trade hub. As China rises, so will the rest of Asia, and Sri Lanka occupies a strategic position in the Indian Ocean as a trade hub. As Hambantota develops, it'll become an important port for Chinese goods to access wider markets, and as trade flows, Sri Lanka's economy will prosper. Sadly, even though you used the word "visionary" to describe China's plans, it appears that you lack this quality you've described.
    1
  25431.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  China's competitor is the USA, and India is most certainly not a competitor (at the moment.) I mean, how many Indian companies can you name that can compete with China? For example, China has many smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, etc Top 10 Smartphone Brands (By GlobalBrands) 1. Samsung (South Korean) 2. Apple (American) 3. Huawei (Chinese) 4. Xiaomi (Chinese) 5. Oppo (Chinese) 6. Vivo (Chinese) 7. Motorola (American but subsidiary of Chinese company Lenovo) 8. Lenovo (Chinese) 9. LG (South Korean) 10. Nokia (Finnish) ... Source: Global Brands But where are the smartphone companies from India that can compete with China's? Yet you claim India is China's competitor? How?
    1
  25432.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "The people of Tibet in exile talks a lot and for your kind information," The Tibetans in Exile are not the actual people living in Tibet, how can you base Tibetan life off their words? Like I mentioned earlier, previously, Tibet under the Dalai Lama was an oppressed region where 95% of the populace were slaves, and the remaining 5% were their owners. Those Tibetan in Exile belong to the previous category, the 5% who were the owners of the 95%. Have you talked to a Tibetan living in Tibet on how much their lives have improved since the 14th Dalai Lama fled Tibet? And speaking of the 14th Dalai Lama, the matter of fact is that he was a traitor to his people, and that he accepted American money to carry out separatist activities in Tibet. We know this from declassified CIA files on the Tibetan Program, and the documents revealed that a total of 1,735,000 USD (equivalent to $17,044,700 in 2023) was devoted to the Tibetan program for 1964. This is actual proof of foreign interference in China's internal affairs in Tibet, so what makes you think the words of those in exile are trustworthy? They have literally been bought off. You said: "1. For China "developing" means "taking over in strategic way"." More of your word twisting. If Hambantota port was taken over, then why is it leased for 99 years, after which the port will be returned to Sri Lanka once the lease expires? It appears you're just making baseless claims against China that's all. You said: "this is what you all been saying thinking that you all are so SMART to hide things from the world and act as if nothing has happened." Show me the proof then. All you've done is make baseless conjecture about China that's all. No actual proof of your claims. You said: "Just like "COVID 19" where CCP tried to hide but at last it came out like a wild and surprise for the world," What wild surprise for the world are you talking about? China had informed the World Health Organization of a new strain of a pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019 (hence the name COVID-19 after the year it was discovered), how was it a surprise for the world? China took immediate action, such as locked down cities like Wuhan (a city of 13 million) during Chinese New Year (the busiest period in China) and cancelled all international flights coming out of Wuhan to the rest of the world. Yet what did the rest of the world do? They had ample warning from China, and instead of mirroring China's actions, they did nothing. How's that a wild surprise?
    1
  25433.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "The people of Tibet in exile talks a lot and for your kind information," The Tibetans in Exile are not the actual people living in Tibet, how can you base Tibetan life off their words? Like I mentioned earlier, previously, Tibet under the Dalai Lama was an oppressed region where 95% of the populace were slaves, and the remaining 5% were their owners. Those Tibetan in Exile belong to the previous category, the 5% who were the owners of the 95%. Have you talked to a Tibetan living in Tibet on how much their lives have improved since the 14th Dalai Lama fled Tibet? And speaking of the 14th Dalai Lama, the matter of fact is that he was a traitor to his people, and that he accepted American money to carry out separatist activities in Tibet. We know this from declassified CIA files on the Tibetan Program, and the documents revealed that a total of 1,735,000 USD (equivalent to $17,044,700 in 2023) was devoted to the Tibetan program for 1964. You said: "1. For China "developing" means "taking over in strategic way"." More of your word twisting. If Hambantota port was taken over, then why is it leased for 99 years, after which the port will be returned to Sri Lanka once the lease expires? It appears you're just making baseless claims against China that's all. You said: "this is what you all been saying thinking that you all are so SMART to hide things from the world and act as if nothing has happened." Show me the proof then. All you've done is make baseless conjecture about China that's all. No actual proof of your claims. You said: "Just like "COVID 19" where CCP tried to hide but at last it came out like a wild and surprise for the world," What wild surprise for the world are you talking about? China had informed the World Health Organization of a new strain of a pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019 (hence the name COVID-19 after the year it was discovered), how was it a surprise for the world? China took immediate action, such as locked down cities like Wuhan (a city of 13 million) during Chinese New Year (the busiest period in China) and cancelled all international flights coming out of Wuhan to the rest of the world. Yet what did the rest of the world do? They had ample warning from China, and instead of mirroring China's actions, they did nothing. How's that a wild surprise?
    1
  25434.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "The people of Tibet in exile talks a lot and for your kind information," The Tibetans in Exile are not the actual people living in Tibet, how can you base Tibetan life off their words? Like I mentioned earlier, previously, Tibet under the Dalai Lama was an oppressed region where 95% of the populace were slaves, and the remaining 5% were their owners. Those Tibetan in Exile belong to the previous category, the 5% who were the owners of the 95%. Have you talked to a Tibetan living in Tibet on how much their lives have improved since the 14th Dalai Lama fled Tibet? And speaking of the 14th Dalai Lama, the matter of fact is that he was a traitor to his people, and that he accepted American CIA money to carry out separatist activities in Tibet. We know this from declassified CIA files on the Tibetan Program, and the documents revealed that he received $180,000 a year from the American CIA, so how can you trust the words of those in exile? You said: "1. For China "developing" means "taking over in strategic way"." More of your word twisting. If Hambantota port was taken over, then why is it leased for 99 years, after which the port will be returned to Sri Lanka once the lease expires? It appears you're just making baseless claims against China that's all. You said: "this is what you all been saying thinking that you all are so SMART to hide things from the world and act as if nothing has happened." Show me the proof then. All you've done is make baseless conjecture about China that's all. No actual proof of your claims. You said: "Just like "COVID 19" where CCP tried to hide but at last it came out like a wild and surprise for the world," What wild surprise for the world are you talking about? China had informed the World Health Organization of a new strain of a pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019 (hence the name COVID-19 after the year it was discovered), how was it a surprise for the world? China took immediate action, such as locked down cities like Wuhan (a city of 13 million) during Chinese New Year (the busiest period in China) and cancelled all international flights coming out of Wuhan to the rest of the world. Yet what did the rest of the world do? They had ample warning from China, and instead of mirroring China's actions, they did nothing. How's that a wild surprise?
    1
  25435.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "The people of Tibet in exile talks a lot and for your kind information," The Tibetans in Exile are not the actual people living in Tibet, how can you base Tibetan life off their words? Like I mentioned earlier, previously, Tibet under the Dalai Lama was an oppressed region where 95% of the populace were slaves, and the remaining 5% were their owners. Those Tibetan in Exile belong to the previous category, the 5% who were the owners of the 95%, what makes you think they were innocent? You said: "1. For China "developing" means "taking over in strategic way"." More of your word twisting. If Hambantota port was taken over, then why is it leased for 99 years, after which the port will be returned to Sri Lanka once the lease expires? It appears you're just making baseless claims against China that's all. You said: "this is what you all been saying thinking that you all are so SMART to hide things from the world and act as if nothing has happened." Show me the proof then. All you've done is make baseless conjecture about China that's all. No actual proof of your claims. You said: "Just like "COVID 19" where CCP tried to hide but at last it came out like a wild and surprise for the world," What wild surprise for the world are you talking about? China had informed the World Health Organization of a new strain of a pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019 (hence the name COVID-19 after the year it was discovered), how was it a surprise for the world? China took immediate action, such as locked down cities like Wuhan (a city of 13 million) during Chinese New Year (the busiest period in China) and cancelled all international flights coming out of Wuhan to the rest of the world. Yet what did the rest of the world do? They had ample warning from China, and instead of mirroring China's actions, they did nothing. How's that a wild surprise?
    1
  25436.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "1. For China "developing" means "taking over in strategic way"." More of your word twisting. If Hambantota port was taken over, then why is it leased for 99 years, after which the port will be returned to Sri Lanka once the lease expires? It appears you're just making baseless claims against China that's all. You said: "The people of Tibet in exile talks a lot and for your kind information," The Tibetans in Exile are not the actual people living in Tibet, how can you base Tibetan life off their words? Like I mentioned earlier, previously, Tibet under the Dalai Lama was an oppressed region where 95% of the populace were slaves, and the remaining 5% were their owners. Those Tibetan in Exile belong to the previous category, the 5% who were the owners of the 95%, what makes you think they were innocent? You said: "this is what you all been saying thinking that you all are so SMART to hide things from the world and act as if nothing has happened." Show me the proof then. All you've done is make baseless conjecture about China that's all. No actual proof of your claims. You said: "Just like "COVID 19" where CCP tried to hide but at last it came out like a wild and surprise for the world," What wild surprise for the world are you talking about? China had informed the World Health Organization of a new strain of a pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019 (hence the name COVID-19 after the year it was discovered), how was it a surprise for the world? China took immediate action, such as locked down cities like Wuhan (a city of 13 million) during Chinese New Year (the busiest period in China) and cancelled all international flights coming out of Wuhan to the rest of the world. Yet what did the rest of the world do? They had ample warning from China, and instead of mirroring China's actions, they did nothing. How's that a wild surprise?
    1
  25437.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "The only response I can give for this is "You should be good story book writer blending truth in the story." Show me proof of your claims then! I've already shown you how Tibet transformed from an oppressed region previously under the Dalai Lama, into arguably the most advanced Himalayan region today compared to its neighbors Nepal and Bhutan. The people in Tibet even have access to 5G networks, You said: "Yes we see your dominance over the Indian ocean like showing aggression to Philippines," Aggression to the Philippines? The Philippines coastguard boat (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) shot to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng (洪石成). Which Philippine boat did the Chinese coastguard opened gun fire on? Answer: None! You said: "docking spy ships near Sri Lanka in the name of research and so on." Which ship are you talking about? The Yuan Wang 5 is space tracking ship, used to monitor satellite, rocket and intercontinental ballistic missile launches primary from the People's Liberation Army. If anything, it was designed to "spy" on China's own missiles and collect data about the missile trajectory. Also, the Yuan Wang 5 was given permission to dock on the condition it would not carry out research while in Sri Lankan waters. You said: "Now CCP's eye is on "Bangladesh" and using proxy via Myanmar (Burma)" How is Myanmar (Burma is the colonial name) a proxy of China? Myanmar is one of China's neighbors, and if any conflict breaks out in Myanmar (between rebels and the junta) it will be China that's affected.
    1
  25438.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "The only response I can give for this is "You should be good story book writer blending truth in the story." Show me proof of your claims then! You're the one making conjectures about Tibetans being used for free labor, where is the proof? You said: "Yes we see your dominance over the Indian ocean like showing aggression to Philippines," Aggression to the Philippines? The Philippines coastguard boat (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) shot to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng. Which Philippine boat did the Chinese coastguard opened gun fire on? Answer: None! You said: "docking spy ships near Sri Lanka in the name of research and so on." Which ship are you talking about? The Yuan Wang 5 is space tracking ship, used to monitor satellite, rocket and intercontinental ballistic missile launches primary from the People's Liberation Army. If anything, it was designed to "spy" on China's own missiles and collect data about the missile trajectory. Also, the Yuan Wang 5 was given permission to dock on the condition it would not carry out research while in Sri Lankan waters. You said: "Now CCP's eye is on "Bangladesh" and using proxy via Myanmar (Burma)" How is Myanmar (Burma is the colonial name) a proxy of China? Myanmar is one of China's neighbors, and if any conflict breaks out in Myanmar (between rebels and the junta) it will be China that's affected.
    1
  25439.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "The only response I can give for this is "You should be good story book writer blending truth in the story." Show me proof of your claims then! You're the one making conjectures about Tibetans being used for free labor, where is the proof? You said: "Yes we see your dominance over the Indian ocean like showing aggression to Philippines," Aggression to the Philippines? The Philippines coastguard boat (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) open fire and shot to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng (洪石成). Which Philippine boat did the Chinese coastguard opened gun fire on? Answer: None! You said: "docking spy ships near Sri Lanka in the name of research and so on." Which ship are you talking about? The Yuan Wang 5 is space tracking ship, used to monitor satellite, rocket and intercontinental ballistic missile launches primary from the People's Liberation Army. If anything, it was designed to spy on China's own missiles and collect data about the missile trajectory. Also, the Yuan Wang 5 was given permission to dock on the condition it would not carry out research while in Sri Lankan waters. You said: "Now CCP's eye is on "Bangladesh" and using proxy via Myanmar (Burma)" How is Myanmar (Burma is the colonial name) a proxy of China? Myanmar is one of China's neighbors so any instability in Myanmar it will be China that's affected.
    1
  25440.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "The only response I can give for this is "You should be good story book writer blending truth in the story." Show me proof of your claims then! You're the one making conjectures about Tibetans being used for free labor, where is the proof? You said: "Yes we see your dominance over the Indian ocean like showing aggression to Philippines," Aggression to the Philippines? A 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng (洪石成) was shot and killed by the Philippines coastguard (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001). Whereas which Philippine boat did the Chinese coastguard opened fire on? Answer: None! You said: "docking spy ships near Sri Lanka in the name of research and so on." Which ship are you talking about? The Yuan Wang 5 is space tracking ship, used to monitor satellite, rocket and intercontinental ballistic missile launches primary from the People's Liberation Army. If anything, it was designed to "spy" on China's own missiles and collect data about the missile trajectory. Also, the Yuan Wang 5 was given permission to dock on the condition it would not carry out research while in Sri Lankan waters. You said: "Now CCP's eye is on "Bangladesh" and using proxy via Myanmar (Burma)" How is Myanmar (Burma is the colonial name) a proxy of China? Myanmar is one of China's neighbors, and if any conflict breaks out in Myanmar (between rebels and the junta) it will be China that's affected.
    1
  25441.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "Yes we see your dominance over the Indian ocean like showing aggression to Philippines," Aggression to the Philippines? A 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng (洪石成) was shot and killed by the Philippines coastguard (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001). Whereas which Philippine boat did the Chinese coastguard opened fire on? Answer: None! You said: "docking spy ships near Sri Lanka in the name of research and so on." Which ship are you talking about? The Yuan Wang 5 is space tracking ship, used to monitor satellite, rocket and intercontinental ballistic missile launches primary from the People's Liberation Army. If anything, it was designed to "spy" on China's own missiles and collect data about the missile trajectory. Also, the Yuan Wang 5 was given permission to dock on the condition it would not carry out research while in Sri Lankan waters. You said: "Now CCP's eye is on "Bangladesh" and using proxy via Myanmar (Burma)" How is Myanmar (Burma is the colonial name) a proxy of China? Myanmar is one of China's neighbors, and if any conflict breaks out in Myanmar (between rebels and the junta) it will be China that's affected.
    1
  25442.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "The only response I can give for this is "You should be good story book writer blending truth in the story." Show me proof of your claims then! You're the one making conjectures about Tibetans being used for free labor, where is the proof? You said: "Yes we see your dominance over the Indian ocean like showing aggression to Philippines," Aggression to the Philippines? The Philippines coastguard boat (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) killed a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng (洪石成). Whereas Chinese coastguard have not killed any Filipinos. You said: "docking spy ships near Sri Lanka in the name of research and so on." Which ship are you talking about? The Yuan Wang 5 is space tracking ship, used to monitor satellite, rocket and intercontinental ballistic missile launches primary from the People's Liberation Army. If anything, it was designed to "spy" on China's own missiles and collect data about the missile trajectory. Also, the Yuan Wang 5 was given permission to dock on the condition it would not carry out research while in Sri Lankan waters. You said: "Now CCP's eye is on "Bangladesh" and using proxy via Myanmar (Burma)" How is Myanmar (Burma is the colonial name) a proxy of China? Myanmar is one of China's neighbors, and if any conflict breaks out in Myanmar (between rebels and the junta) it will be China that's affected.
    1
  25443.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "The only response I can give for this is "You should be good story book writer blending truth in the story." Show me proof of your claims then! You're the one making conjectures about Tibetans being used for free labor, where is the proof? You said: "Yes we see your dominance over the Indian ocean like showing aggression to Philippines," Aggression to the Philippines? The Philippines coastguard boat (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) shot to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng. Which Philippine boat did the Chinese coastguard opened gun fire on? Answer: None! You said: "docking spy ships near Sri Lanka in the name of research and so on." Which ship are you talking about? The Yuan Wang 5 is space tracking ship, used to monitor satellite, rocket and intercontinental ballistic missile launches primary from the People's Liberation Army. If anything, it was designed to "spy" on China's own missiles and collect data about the missile trajectory. Also, the Yuan Wang 5 was given permission to dock on the condition it would not carry out research while in Sri Lankan waters. You said: "Now CCP's eye is on "Bangladesh" and using proxy via Myanmar (Burma)" How is Myanmar (Burma is the colonial name) a proxy of China? Myanmar is one of China's neighbors, and if any conflict breaks out in Myanmar (between rebels and the junta) it will be China that's affected.
    1
  25444.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "The only response I can give for this is "You should be good story book writer blending truth in the story." Show me proof of your claims then! You're the one making conjectures about Tibetans being used for free labor, where is the proof? You said: "Yes we see your dominance over the Indian ocean like showing aggression to Philippines," Aggression to the Philippines? The Philippines coastguard boat (Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) shot to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng (洪石成). Which Philippine boat did the Chinese coastguard opened gun fire on? Answer: None! You said: "docking spy ships near Sri Lanka in the name of research and so on." The Yuan Wang 5 was given permission to dock on the condition it would not carry out research while in Sri Lankan waters. You said: "Now CCP's eye is on "Bangladesh" and using proxy via Myanmar (Burma)" How is Myanmar (Burma is the colonial name) a proxy of China? Myanmar is one of China's neighbors, and if any conflict breaks out in Myanmar (between rebels and the junta) it will be China that's affected.
    1
  25445.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  "I was using as a "metaphor" to make it more exemplary" How is comparing China to a cat making it more exemplary? They are completely unrelated, it's like comparing apples to oranges (i.e A false equivalence fallacy) All your talk of China annexing Sri Lanka is just your own conjecture that's all, since when China ever made any claims over Sri Lanka? Do Sri Lankans have Chinese blood in their veins or something, that China must annex Sri Lanka? What exactly do you base your own conjecture off in the first place? You said: "Well, I cannot argue more with that BRI" Yeah, because you can't deny it. Pascal's guest talks about Bhutan being "land-connected, not landlocked" yet everyone knows its China's BRI that's making landlocked countries more land-connected. 150 countries have applied to join BRI, but Bhutan is not one of them, so if anything, how is Bhutan qualified to lead the rise of Asia (as in Pascal's title) when everyone knows it's China that's responsible for Asia's rise, and that Bhutan refuses to ride the wave generated by China?
    1
  25446.  @Faceless-Patriote  @ I have my points already. YOU ARE PETTY. What points? It looks as though you ran out of points, and you are now just resorting to name calling that's all.
    1
  25447.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "The new villages and road built inside Bhutanese territory. What do you have to say on this?" The region was historically part of Tibet but was ceded to Bhutan in 1913 by the 13th Dalai Lama, the then-ruler of Tibet, according to historian Tsering Shakya. But in 1913, mainland China was in turbulent period of the Chinese Civil War, so the transfer of Tibetan territory by the Dalai Lama to Bhutan was not recognized by the mainland government. The thing is, the Bhutan-China border is not demarcated (even after 25 rounds of border talks with Bhutan) so who's to say which part if Bhutan's territory and which one is China's? Currently, there is no boundary that's acceptable to both sides, so you claim the new villages and roads were built inside Bhutanese territory, but the border is un-demarcated, so China could also say it's part of Tibet and therefore, within Chinese territory.
    1
  25448.  makethman574  How much do you even know about the history of Tibet before claiming such ignorance of me? Previously, Tibet under the Dalai Lama was an oppressed region where 95% of the populace were slaves, and the remaining 5% were their owners. Those Tibetans that fled and are in exile, they belong to the latter category; the 5% who were the owners of the 95%. And what cost to Tibetan culture and beliefs are you talking about? Have you actually been to Tibet and seen what life is like there for yourself? Look up videos of Lhasa, you can see many religious Tibetans prostrating themselves on the ground in open worship and spinning those Tibetan prayer wheels how are their beliefs threatened? Tibetan monks debate each other inside Lhasa's monasteries, with lines of Tibetan prayer flags hang along religious sites. Tibetans in Lhasa can been seen dressed in traditional Tibetan clothing (chuba) hats, women headdresses, and playing traditional Tibetan musical instruments like the dramyin. Explain what is the cost to Tibetan culture and beliefs? Foreign tourists have visited Lhasa Tibet and uploaded videos of their experience in Lhasa onto YouTube, yet even though you have access to these videos, you still don't know what life is like in Lhasa Tibet? Why claim YouTube is illegal in China, when there are successful Chinese vloggers like Li Ziqi, whose YouTube channel received the Guinness World Record for "The most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube"?
    1
  25449.  @Faceless-Patriote  Petty? You're the one claiming "The new villages and road built inside Bhutanese territory." when Bhutan refuse to demarcate its border with China (even after 25 rounds of talks) so how can you claim it's Bhutanese territory? Also building houses, roads and infrastructure benefit the local people living in those villages. Recently a remote region of Tibet was hit by earthquake, and the People's Liberation Army was mobilized to the affected region and the roads help bring emergency supplies to the earthquake region in Tibet. Even if say China and Bhutan somehow managed to resolve our border issue, the roads that were built in those remote villages belong to the locals, whichever side (China's or Bhutan's) they end up becoming part of. You're just making a mountain out of a molehill with China building those roads, yet you're calling me petty?
    1
  25450.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  So India annexing all those territory mean nothing to you, but when Tibet rejoins mainland China, you call it expansionist? Since you admitted that Tibet was historically part of China 800 years ago, then how is it expansionist when China is merely reclaiming our historically territory? You said: "Why don't you surrender whole China to "Mongolia" Mongolia doesn't claim whole of China, then why should China surrender to Mongolia? Also, it was Kublai Khan (grandson of Genghis Khan) that chose to abandon his Mongolian nomadic culture and proclaim himself Emperor of Yuan Dynasty China. The Mongols know nuts about running an empire as large as China. -Who grows the food needed to feed the population? Mongols were nomads who lived off the land, so it was Han Chinese farmers who grew the food necessary to feed the empire. -Who ensures the empire is run smoothly? The Mongols know little of bureaucracy so it was Han Chinese bureaucrats that kept the Empire running. -Who plans the towns and builds buildings in the empire? The Mongols live in temporary housing, so it was up to Han Chinese architects to plan the towns and build houses. Emperor Kublai himself choose to sleep in the Imperial palace, not in a nomadic Mongolian tent, so if anything, the Yuan Dynasty was Chinese in nature, not Mongolian.
    1
  25451.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "Well if you don't understand what "metaphor" is then what to say." A metaphor is a figure of speech that describes an object or action in a way that isn't literally true, but helps explain an idea or make a comparison. Therefore, you are comparing China to a cat, and I'm asking how is that comparison valid in the first place? You don't even know that a metaphor is a comparison yourself? Just like you didn't even know you wrote the word "visionary" yourself to describe China? You said: "Bhutan would have vanished from the world map like Tibet" The current Bhutan today might as well have vanished from the world map, hardly anyone knows of this place. Land-connected means having roads, railways and other infrastructure connecting the normally isolated Himalayan region to the rest of the world, so that tourists and businesses visit. That's what's happening in Tibet as many foreign tourists have visited Lhasa and remarked on such progress in the region under the Chinese government.
    1
  25452.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  Which religious places in Tibet are you referring to? Tibet has more than 1,700 sites for Tibetan Buddhist activities, one Catholic church, 46,000 monks and nuns, 358 living Buddhas, more than 12,000 Muslims, and more than 700 Catholics. You said: "Well what you going to say about "the fresh clashes with Philippines is all over the news. Just google it." That's because the Philippines intentionally grounded a WWII vessel (the BRP Sierra Madre) onto the Second Thomas Shoal in 1999. Philippine president Joseph Estrada promised that the vessel would be towed away. In 2014, the Chinese government asked the Philippines to remove the grounded ship. In 2017, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte accepted gentlemen's agreement with China to maintain the status quo, and under this agreement, no construction materials would be allowed to fortify the Sierra Madre to avoid escalations. However, the recent clashes was because Philippines sent supply ships carrying construction materials to reinforce the hull of the decaying vessel, and that resorted in the clashes over the Second Thomas Shoal today.
    1
  25453.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "Yes, maybe like a story of sending air balloon few years back." What air balloon are you talking about? You can't refute my point about the Yuan Wang 5 research vessel, so you jump to a different topic altogether? You said: "Myanmar is also neighbor of Thailand too. Did that conflict effecting Thailand too." Of course. Thailand is clearly concerned over the conflict in Myanmar, and they even brought up the topic of the Myanmar during ASEAN meetings, what makes you think Thailand is not affected? You said: "Maybe China is being affected because CCP is grooming a proxy that would go against the Myanmar government." Are you serious? China supports the Myanmar government, since there are several ongoing Chinese projects in Myanmar, then why would China groom a proxy that would go against the Myanmar government and derail those projects? Look, Myanmar is even a member of China's Belt and Road Initiative, why on Earth would China want to create trouble in Myanmar?
    1
  25454.  @DrukpaGamer-kx4gr  You said: "Thank god, you didn't say "Apple (Chinese)" That's why I wrote China's greatest competitor is the United States of America, NOT India. Where are the famous smartphone companies from India that can compete with China? Yet you're claiming India is China's competitor? How? Apart from smartphone companies, China has also produced many successful Internet companies like _Alibaba, JD, Tencent, ByteDance, Meituan, etc. List of Largest Internet Companies 1. Amazon (American) 2. Alphabet (American) 3. JD (Chinese) 4. Meta (American) 5. Alibaba (Chinese) 6. Tencent (Chinese) 7. ByteDance (Chinese) 8. Netflix (American) 9. Meituan (Chinese) 10. Paypal (American) But where are all the famous Internet companies from India that can measure up to Chinese Internet companies? Yet you claim India is China's competitor? How? You said: "Well, when India tries to increase the market or try to compete, the world sees the new conflicts and claims from China like new border aggression." The India-China border dispute has been ongoing and has nothing to do with India's economic development. The border dispute is because India's border was drawn by British cartographer (Henry McMahon) ignoring existing boundaries and also without consulting China. The McMahon Line is not recognized by China, frankly because it's an artificial line was drawn by a foreigner, by someone without intimate knowledge of local historical boundaries. China wants to negotiate new border deal with India (China had 30 rounds of border talks with India) that is agreeable to both sides, however, India still clings to the McMahon Line because of colonial mentality. Seems like even though the British left India, the minds of the local people remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters. You said: "and claims made on Arunachal Pradesh (don't say, AP is also part of China) to divert the attention" China doesn't want all of Arunachal Pradesh, only Tawang region since it was historically part of Southern Tibet. However, even after 30 rounds of border talks with India, China and India still fail to reach a border deal. You said: "Do you think China is not worried about India's growth?" Of course not. India is a member of BRICS, just like China. India is also a member of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, why would China want to continue to work with India if China was worried about India's growth? In fact, China invited India to the Belt and Road Initiative to join in mutual prosperity (but India rejected China's invitation). India is a part of Asia, just like Bhutan is also part of Asia. Still, everyone knows it's China that's the primary driving force behind the rise of Asia. Asia's rise will be further boosted by economic cooperation between China with India and Bhutan, yet obstacles remain and prevent this from becoming a reality.
    1
  25455.  @Faceless-Patriote  How can you prove it's inside Bhutan? The Bhutanese authorities have denied the presence of Chinese settlements on Bhutan’s territory. Bhutan's Ambassador to India, Major General Vetsop Namgyel said: "There is no Chinese village inside Bhutan." Even the Bhutanese Prime Minister, Lotay Tshering told a Belgian newspaper that hese purported settlements do not fall in Bhutanese territory. “We have said categorically that there are no intrusions,” Bhutan’s PM Lotay Tshering told Belgian daily La Libre. Therefore, according to the Bhutanese authorities, China is building roads and villages inside China's own territory You said: "It’s a duel purpose infrastructure and people are given incentive to settle there." Everything can be dual purpose, what's your point? Civilian infrastructure can be repurposed for military use during times of war, but does that mean the infrastructure should not be built? During times of peace, the roads help connect the villages so that in case of emergency (like the tragic earthquake in Tibet) that medical supplies and disaster relief can be sent to affected regions.
    1
  25456.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "Why don’t you guys man up and send in the military? At least have some ball to invade properly." So it turns out that you're the one being petty here, advocating for violence instead of a peaceful solution. All this time you accuse China of being belligerent, yet here you are promoting military conflict between Bhutan and China, then who is the petty one? You want thousands of people to die on both sides just because you can't stand the peaceful non-conflict approach of border talks? You said: "Oh we know about your military, best in the world yeah, send them and show your real face." I advocate for neighborly peace, it's you that are the one revealing your real face here advocating for bloodshed, while calling China belligerent. Furthermore, the Bhutanese authorities have category denied the presence of Chinese settlements on Bhutan's territory, yet you call yourself an ordinary Bhutanese? Sounds like you might actually be Indian, given the way you constantly stand up for India and refuse to discuss India's annexation of Goa, Manipur , Nagaland, Tripura, J&K, etc. That's probably your real face.
    1
  25457.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "Why don’t you guys man up and send in the military? At least have some ball to invade properly." So it turns out that you're the one being petty here, calling for violence instead of a peaceful solution. All this time you accuse China of being belligerent, yet here you are promoting military conflict between Bhutan and China, then who is the petty one? You said: "Oh we know about your military, best in the world yeah, send them and show your real face." I advocate for neighborly peace, it's you that are the one revealing your real face here advocating for violence, while calling China belligerent. Furthermore, the Bhutanese authorities have category denied the presence of Chinese settlements on Bhutan's territory, yet you call yourself an ordinary Bhutanese? Sounds like you might actually be Indian, given the way you constantly stand up for India and refuse to discuss India's annexation of Goa, Manipur , Nagaland, Tripura, J&K, etc.
    1
  25458.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "Why don’t you guys man up and send in the military? At least have some ball to invade properly." So it turns out that you're the one being petty here, calling for violence instead of a peaceful solution. All this time you accuse China of being belligerent, yet here you are promoting outright military conflict between Bhutan and China, then who is the petty one? You said: "Oh we know about your military, best in the world yeah, send them and show your real face." I advocate for neighborly peace, it's you that are the one revealing your real face here by calling for war, while calling China belligerent. Furthermore, the Bhutanese authorities have category denied the presence of Chinese settlements on Bhutan's territory, yet you call yourself an ordinary Bhutanese? Sounds like you might actually be Indian, given the way you constantly stand up for India and refuse to discuss India's annexation of Goa, Manipur , Nagaland, Tripura, J&K, etc.
    1
  25459.  @Faceless-Patriote  There's no truth to what you said. Even the Bhutanese authorities themselves have denied the presence of Chinese settlements on Bhutan’s territory, what more is there to say? Please point out where's the so-called "truth" in your statement. And clearly the one who's already triggered is the one shouting "YOU ARE PETTY" multiple times, yet you're calling me triggered? You said: "I don’t understand the politics of the statement but on ground, the reality is different." You refuse to accept the statements made by the Bhutanese authorities, so you just dismiss them that's all? Bhutan’s Ambassador to India, Major General Vetsip Namgyel, said that there was no Chinese village inside Bhutan. And Bhutan’s PM Lotay Tshering has categorically denied intrusions of Chinese villages on Bhutan's territory. Explain what's the reality on the ground then. I presume you sourced those images from Google Maps? Senior Bhutanese journalist, Tenzing Lamsang, has said that the reports of Chinese building villages inside Bhutan were based on open-source information like Google Maps, which are not reliable. Here's the tweet by Bhutanese journalist, Tenzing Lamsang -Thread -Have seen and read reports of the Chinese allegedly building a village 2 km inside Bhutan in Doklam area. -However, as per reliable sources in Bhutan there is no ‘Chinese village’ constructed inside Bhutan. — Tenzing Lamsang November 20, 2020 Tell me what's the reality is on the ground if you disagree.
    1
  25460.  @Faceless-Patriote  There's no truth to what you said. Even the Bhutanese authorities themselves have denied the presence of Chinese settlements on Bhutan’s territory, what more is there to say? Please point out where's the so-called "truth" in your statement. And clearly the one who's already triggered is the one shouting "YOU ARE PETTY" multiple times, yet you're calling me triggered? You said: "I don’t understand the politics of the statement.." Bhutan’s Ambassador to India, Major General Vetsip Namgyel, said that there was no Chinese village inside Bhutan. And Bhutan’s PM Lotay Tshering has categorically denied intrusions of Chinese villages on Bhutan's territory. You refuse to accept the statements made by the Bhutanese authorities, so you just dismiss them that's all? You said: "but on ground, the reality is different." What's the reality on the ground then? The fact is that those claims of China building villages inside Bhutan were based off satellite imagery taken off Google Maps. Senior Bhutanese journalist Tenzing Lamsang said that the reports were based on open-source information like Google Maps, which are not reliable. He tweeted: "Have seen and read reports of the Chinese allegedly building a village 2 km inside Bhutan in Doklam area. However, as per reliable sources in Bhutan there is no ‘Chinese village’ constructed inside Bhutan." — Tenzing Lamsang November 20, 2020.
    1
  25461.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "I want nothing but peaceful relationships with China with more people to people contact" Earlier you were advocating a violent solution, calling for a Chinese military invasion, why pretend that you suddenly care about peaceful relationship? As for people to people contact, Chinese can be found all over the world. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists and international students visiting your countries. In fact, before 2019, China was the biggest source of outbound tourism as well as the biggest source of international students. Have you actually talked to a Chinese within your area? You said: "but the first step should be that China stop claiming our territory based on history" Why should China give up our claims? What does Bhutan base their territorial claims over, if not history? Even India has annexed the territories of Sikkim, Goa, Manipur, Nagaland, Tripura, J&K, etc for the same historical reasons. You said: "maintain status quo until the border is demarcated," Who's preventing the border from being demarcated? China has had 25 rounds of border talks with Bhutan, yet all 25 talks ended in failure. It's because Bhutan has been politically captured by India. Doklam is located on Bhutan-China border, NOT on the India-China border, so why India care about it's neighbor's border? You said: "then we be brother from different mother" Why should I be brothers with someone who advocates for violent solution instead of a peaceful resolution? Why should I be brothers with someone who calls for separatism in what's universally recognized as a part of China? And why should I be brothers with someone who considers me petty?
    1
  25462.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "I want nothing but peaceful relationships with China with more people to people contact" Earlier you were calling for a violent solution, why pretend that you suddenly care about peaceful relationship? As for people to people contact, Chinese can be found all over the world. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists and international students visiting your countries. In fact, before 2019, China was the biggest source of outbound tourism as well as the biggest source of international students. Have you actually talked to a Chinese within your area? You said: "but the first step should be that China stop claiming our territory based on history" Why should China give up our claims? What does Bhutan base their territorial claims over, if not history? Even India has annexed the territories of Sikkim, Goa, Manipur, Nagaland, Tripura, J&K, etc for the same historical reasons. You said: "maintain status quo until the border is demarcated," Who's preventing the border from being demarcated? China has had 25 rounds of border talks with Bhutan, yet all 25 talks ended in failure. It's because Bhutan has been politically captured by India. Doklam is located on Bhutan-China border, NOT on the India-China border, so why India care about it's neighbor's border? You said: "then we be brother from different mother" Why be brothers with someone who calls others "PETTY" just because we take a different view? Why be brothers with someone who calls for a violent solution instead of peaceful resolution? Why be brothers with someone calling for separatism in Tibet (which is a universally recognized part of China)?
    1
  25463.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "I want nothing but peaceful relationships with China with more people to people contact" Earlier you were calling for a military invasion, why pretend that you suddenly care about peaceful relationship? As for people to people contact, Chinese can be found all over the world. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists and international students visiting your countries. In fact, before 2019, China was the biggest source of outbound tourism as well as the biggest source of international students. Have you actually talked to a Chinese within your area? You said: "but the first step should be that China stop claiming our territory based on history" Why should China give up our claims? What does Bhutan base their territorial claims over, if not history? Even India has annexed the territories of Sikkim, Goa, Manipur, Nagaland, Tripura, J&K, etc for the same historical reasons. You said: "maintain status quo until the border is demarcated," Who's preventing the border from being demarcated? China has had 25 rounds of border talks with Bhutan, yet all 25 talks ended in failure. It's because Bhutan has been politically captured by India. Doklam is located on Bhutan-China border, NOT on the India-China border, so why India care about it's neighbor's border? You said: "then we be brother from different mother" Why be brothers with someone who calls others "PETTY" just because we take a different view? Why be brothers with someone who calls for military invasion instead of peaceful resolution? Why be brothers with someone who supports separatism in Tibet (a universally recognized part of China)?
    1
  25464.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "I want nothing but peaceful relationships with China with more people to people contact" Earlier you were calling for a military invasion, why pretend that you suddenly care about peaceful relationship? As for people to people contact, Chinese can be found all over the world. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists and international students visiting your countries. In fact, before 2019, China was the biggest source of outbound tourism as well as the biggest source of international students. Have you actually talked to a Chinese within your area? You said: "but the first step should be that China stop claiming our territory based on history" Why should China give up our claims? What does Bhutan base their territorial claims over, if not history? You said: "maintain status quo until the border is demarcated," Who's preventing the border from being demarcated? China has had 25 rounds of border talks with Bhutan, yet all 25 talks ended in failure. You said: "then we be brother from different mother" Why be brothers with someone who calls others "PETTY" just because we take a different view? Why be brothers with someone who calls for military invasion instead of peaceful resolution? Why be brothers with someone who supports separating Tibet from the rest of China?
    1
  25465.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "I want nothing but peaceful relationships with China with more people to people contact" Earlier you were calling for a military invasion, why suddenly pretend to care about peaceful relationship? You said: "but the first step should be that China stop claiming our territory based on history" Why should China give up our claims? What does Bhutan base their territorial claims over, if not history? You said: "maintain status quo until the border is demarcated," Who's preventing the border from being demarcated? China has had 25 rounds of border talks with Bhutan, yet all 25 talks ended in failure. You said: "then we be brother from different mother" Why be brothers with someone who calls others "PETTY" just because we take a different view? Why be brothers with someone who calls for military invasion instead of peaceful resolution? Why be brothers with someone who supports separating Tibet from the rest of China?
    1
  25466.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "I want nothing but peaceful relationships with China with more people to people contact" Earlier you were advocating a military invasion, why suddenly pretend to care about peaceful relationship? You said: "but the first step should be that China stop claiming our territory based on history" Why should China give up our claims? What does Bhutan base their territorial claims over, if not history? You said: "maintain status quo until the border is demarcated," Who's preventing the border from being demarcated? China has had 25 rounds of border talks with Bhutan, yet all 25 talks failed to resolve the border dispute. You said: "then we be brother from different mother" Why be brothers with someone who calls others "PETTY" just because we take a different view? Why be brothers with someone who advocates military invasion instead of peaceful resolution? Why be brothers with someone who supports Tibetan separatism from the rest of China?
    1
  25467.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: "I want nothing but peaceful relationships with China with more people to people contact" Earlier you were calling for a military invasion, why pretend that you suddenly care about peaceful relationship? As for people to people contact, Chinese can be found all over the world. Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists and international students visiting your countries. In fact, before 2019, China was the biggest source of outbound tourism as well as the biggest source of international students. Have you actually talked to a Chinese within your area? You said: "but the first step should be that China stop claiming our territory based on history" Why should China give up our claims? What does Bhutan base their territorial claims over, if not history? You said: "maintain status quo until the border is demarcated," Who's preventing the border from being demarcated? China has had 25 rounds of border talks with Bhutan, yet all 25 talks ended in failure. You said: "then we be brother from different mother" Why be brothers with someone who calls others "PETTY" just because we take a different view? Why be brothers with someone who calls for military invasion instead of peaceful resolution? Why be brothers with someone who supports separating Tibet from the rest of China?
    1
  25468.  @Faceless-Patriote  You said: " hahaha you are petty! I want nothing but peaceful relationships with China" More insults. Earlier you were literally advocating military invasion, why this pretense over wanting a peaceful relationship with China? Weren't you also earlier expressing your continued support of Tibetan separatism, yet claim to want a peaceful relation with China? You said: "China stop claiming our territory based on history." Bhutan also claims their territory on history, why should China give up our claims? You said: "maintain status quo until the border is demarcated," How long will it take to get the border demarcated? China had so many border talks with Bhutan yet all ended in failure. Does this mean that the people at the border don't deserve having infrastructure like roads and railways? You said: "then we be brother from different mother" Why be brothers with someone who calls others "petty" all the time? Why be brothers with someone who advocates military invasion? Why be brothers with someone who support Tibetan separatism?
    1
  25469.  @Faceless-Patriote  Boring? I've asked you to please point out where's the so-called "truth" in your statement. But it's obvious you can't refute the statements made by the Bhutanese authorities. Even the senior Bhutanese journalist tweeted that the reports were based on open-source information like Google Maps, which are not reliable. You've literally making groundless claims about China building settlements on Bhutanese territory, yet after being proven wrong, you just call me petty and boring?
    1
  25470.  @Faceless-Patriote  It's apparent from your words that you don't want a peaceful relationship with China, why pretend that you want to be brothers from a different mother? You support military invasion instead of peaceful resolution, and you support separatism in what's recognized universally as a part of Chinese territory. The fact is that Tibetan independence is an American CIA program, and even the Dalai Lama criticized the program in his 1991 autobiography Freedom in Exile, declaring that this proved that there were ulterior motives other than helping the Tibetan people.
    1
  25471.  @Faceless-Patriote  I've asked you to please point out where's the so-called "truth" in your statement. But it's obvious you can't refute the statements made by the Bhutanese authorities, so you resort to hurling personal insults that's all. Even the senior Bhutanese journalist tweet reinforced the Bhutanese official stance that there is no Chinese village constructed inside Bhutan, so why'd you believe such rumors about China in the first place?
    1
  25472.  @Faceless-Patriote  It's apparent from your words that you don't want a peaceful relationship with China, why pretend that you want to be brothers from a different mother? You support military invasion instead of peaceful resolution, and you support separatism in what's recognized universally as a part of Chinese territory. The fact is that Tibetan independence is an American CIA program, and even the Dalai Lama criticized the program in his 1991 autobiography Freedom in Exile, declaring that this proved that there were ulterior motives other than helping the Tibetan people.
    1
  25473.  @Faceless-Patriote  In his 1991 autobiography Freedom in Exile, the 14th Dalai Lama criticized the CIA for supporting the Tibetan independence movement "not because they cared about Tibetan independence, but as part of their worldwide efforts to destabilize all communist governments". -In 1999, the Dalai Lama suggested that the CIA Tibetan program had been harmful to Tibet because it primarily served American interests, claiming "once the American policy toward China changed, they stopped their help ... The Americans had a different agenda from the Tibetans." This is proven true because after President Nixon's visit to China, the Americans stopped caring about Tibetan independence. Today, countries all over the world (including US) recognize Tibet as part of the People's Republic of China
    1
  25474.  @Faceless-Patriote  Earlier you said that was truth to what you said, well where is it? Those satellite images taken off Google Maps turned out to be unreliable, and the Bhutanese authorities have acknowledged that there are no Chinese villages in Bhutan's territory, then where did you hear the rumors from? You can't refute my points so you resort to hurling personal insults?
    1
  25475.  @Faceless-Patriote  Tibet has already been freed from the Dalai Lama. He was a traitor to his people, receiving American funding to conduct separatist activities in Tibet. Declassified files indicate the 14th Dalai Lama was financially supported by the CIA between the late 1950s and the mid-1970s, receiving $180,000 a year. This is actual proof of foreign meddling in China's own internal affairs in Tibet.
    1
  25476.  @Faceless-Patriote  Tibet has already been freed from the Dalai Lama. He turned out to be a fraud, having accepted American CIA funding to conduct separatist activities in Tibet. Declassified files indicate the 14th Dalai Lama was financially supported by the American CIA having receiving $180,000 a year, paid to him personally. That's actual proof of foreign meddling in China's own internal affairs in Tibet.
    1
  25477.  @Faceless-Patriote  Tibet has already been freed from the Dalai Lama, who accepted American funding to conduct separatist activities in Tibet. Declassified files indicate the Dalai Lama received $180,000 a year paid to him personally by the American CIA. That's actual proof of foreign meddling in China's own internal affairs in Tibet.
    1
  25478.  @Faceless-Patriote  Tibet has already been freed from the Dalai Lama. Turns out he was a traitor to his own people and declassified files from the Tibetan Program revealed that he received $180,000 a year, paid to him personally from the American CIA. Here's actual proof of foreign meddling in China's internal affairs.
    1
  25479.  @Faceless-Patriote  Tibet has already been freed from the Dalai Lama. Declassified files from the Tibetan Program revealed that he received $180,000 a year, paid to him personally from the American CIA. That's actual proof of foreign intervention in China's own internal affairs.
    1
  25480.  @Faceless-Patriote  Tibet has already been freed from the 14th Dalai Lama. Declassified files revealed that he was an agent of the American CIA, having received $180,000 a year paid to him personally from the Americans. Isn't this proof that Tibetan separatism was a foreign sponsored operation?
    1
  25481.  @Faceless-Patriote  Tibet has already been freed from the Dalai Lama. He was a traitor to his people, and declassified files indicate the 14th Dalai Lama was financially supported by the CIA between the late 1950s and the mid-1970s, receiving $180,000 a year.
    1
  25482.  @Faceless-Patriote  The 14th Dalai Lama was financially supported by the American CIA between the late 1950s and the mid-1970s, receiving $180,000 a year, paid to him personally. This shows that Tibetan independence was a separatist operation sponsored by the USA.
    1
  25483.  @Faceless-Patriote  Even the 14th Dalai Lama lamented in his autobiography that Tibetan independence movement had been nothing but a tool of the American CIA in order to destabilize China, why do you continue to repeat their propaganda?
    1
  25484.  @Faceless-Patriote  Even the 14th Dalai Lama lamented in his autobiography that Tibetan independence movement had been nothing but a tool of the American CIA in order to destabilize China, why do you continue to support Tibetan Independence? It's clear that you are no friend of China's.
    1
  25485.  @Faceless-Patriote  It's apparent that you do not care for the people of Tibet, why pretend to support Tibetan independence, when even the 14th Dalai Lama himself laments how he had been played for a fool by the American CIA and the Tibetan Independence movement was nothing more than a means to achieve the goal of destabilizing China?
    1
  25486.  @Faceless-Patriote  It's apparent that you do not care for the people of Tibet, why pretend to support Tibetan independence, when even the 14th Dalai Lama himself laments how he had been played for a fool by the Americans, and that the Tibetan Independence movement was nothing more than a means to achieve the goal of destabilizing China? After Nixon's visit to China, relations between the US and China stabilized and the US no longer cared about Tibetan independence. Today, the US recognizes Tibet is part of the People's Republic of China.
    1
  25487.  @Faceless-Patriote  Why pretend to care about the people of Tibet? Even the 14th Dalai Lama himself laments the fact that he was merely a tool in the Tibetan CIA program meant to destabilize China that's all. After Nixon's visit to China, relations between the US and China stabilized and the US no longer cared about Tibetan independence. Today, the US recognizes Tibet is part of the People's Republic of China.
    1
  25488.  @Faceless-Patriote  You don't care about the people of Tibet, why pretend that you do? Even the 14th Dalai Lama lamented in his autobiography that the Tibetan independence movement was merely a means to destabilize China's government that's all, and that the US never truly cared about Tibetan independence. After Nixon's visit to China reestablished US-China relations, the Americans stopped caring about Tibetan independence. Today, the US recognizes Tibet is part of the People's Republic of China.
    1
  25489.  @Faceless-Patriote  You don't care about the people of Tibet, why pretend that you do? Even the Dalai Lama himself regrets the CIA involvement in the Tibetan independence movement being merely a means to destabilize China's government that's all. After Nixon's visit to China reestablished US-China relations, the Americans stopped caring about Tibetan independence and recognize the region as being part of the People's Republic of China.
    1
  25490.  @Faceless-Patriote  Even when shown irrefutable proof that Tibetan independence program was a merely a means to achieve the goal of destabilizing China's government, you just ignore the proof and continue feigning support for Tibetan separatism? Then it's apparent that you don't really care about the people of Tibet in the first place.
    1
  25491.  @Faceless-Patriote  The 14th Dalai Lama was financially supported by the CIA between the late 1950s and the mid-1970s, receiving $180,000 a year, paid to him personally.
    1
  25492.  @Faceless-Patriote  The CIA financially supported the 14th Dalai Lama between the late 1950s and the mid-1970s, receiving $180,000 a year. Isn't this proof of foreign meddling in China's internal affairs?
    1
  25493.  @Faceless-Patriote  I've shown you irrefutable proof of the CIA Tibetan program, and that even the 14th Dalai Lama criticized the CIA in his autobiography, why do you continue to feign support for Tibetan separatism? If anything, all you are showing is just how petty you really are.
    1
  25494.  @Faceless-Patriote  -A total of 1,735,000 dollars (equivalent to $17,044,700 in 2023) was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964. Here's the breakdown of the funding: -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal ($500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva for half a year (US$75,000) -Training ($855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama ($180,000) -Miscellaneous costs ($125,000) ... Here's actually proof of foreign sponsored separatism inside China.
    1
  25495.  @Faceless-Patriote  -A total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the CIA Tibetan program for FY1964. -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal ($500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva for half a year (US$75,000) -Training ($855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama ($180,000) -Miscellaneous costs ($125,000) ... Isn't this actual proof of foreign funded separatism?
    1
  25496.  @Faceless-Patriote  If anything, you're just showing how truly petty you really are. You're unable to refute my points so you just feign support for Tibetan separatism that's all.
    1
  25497. China has anti-ship ballistic missiles like DF-21, nicknamed "Carrier Killer" that can target ships out in the sea from the safety of the land. The missile travels at distances above the stratosphere to avoid detect, and achieve hypersonic speeds on reentry to strike at a target. The following is an animation of the DF-21D. Video:China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile youtube.com/watch?v=p-cEunmqXM8
    1
  25498.  @iz1287  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    1
  25499.  @goliaboi  How's this fighting for One Country, Two Systems? Hong Kong clearly have their own government, separate from the mainland isn't it? And Hong Kong Chief Executive is voted into power by Election Committee (which consist of Hong Kong groups) so isn't Hong Kong able to elect their own leaders? Beijing does not even cast any votes in Hong Kong elections so to speak.
    1
  25500.  @mana2ashida150  Since when is there no election for Hong Kongers to choose their Chief Executive? In the 2017 Chief Executive election, Lam won the three-way election with 777 votes of the 1,194-member Election Committee (which consist of Hong Kong groups) so how is that not Hong Kongers electing their own leaders? Beijing did not cast any votes in Hong Kong elections at all.
    1
  25501.  @mana2ashida150  What do you even know about police brutality? Previously, while Hong Kong was still a British colony, the 1956 HK riots resulted in 59 deaths while the 1967 HK riots resulted in 51 deaths, all while HK was under British colonial rule. After the 1997 handover, in todays 2019 HK riots, there have been zero deaths thus far so aren't the Hong Kong Police showing incredible restraint here?
    1
  25502. 佩服你说了那么多废话。
    1
  25503.  @ashokjain8449  A team of 13 World Health Organization scientists have now arrived in Wuhan, China, where they will investigate the origins of the coronavirus that has caused a global pandemic.
    1
  25504.  @Ming1975  He may not even be Caucasian himself, he has what looks like an Indian name, yet he still thinks that Chinese people somehow need "rescuing from our government" and that China needs to abandon our competent political system and adopt the Western brand of democracy like India.
    1
  25505.  @ashokjain8449  Here's a video of modern day Lhasa, Tibet, China (filmed by WildFilmsIndia) and you can see how developed Lhasa has become under communist party rule. Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, and modern technology like cars, telephone cables, computers, smartphones, WiFi, the Internet, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo (By WildFilmsIndia) Even the poorest Tibetan farmer can afford a smartphone, connect to the Internet and shop online in Taobao and have his purchases shipped all the way to Tibet in the Himalayas. Because Tibet is part of China after all.
    1
  25506.  @ashokjain8449  The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Source: Seventeen Point Agreement wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet.
    1
  25507.  @0x0shkosh  You said: _"Good will always overcome evil. Have you ever seen star wars. That is what I mean." Star Wars is a work of fiction what makes you it's what's going to happen in reality? Yet you're calling me unreliable when you're quoting a work of fiction as your source?
    1
  25508.  @0x0shkosh  "神州 Shenzhou first of all, you are un reliable." Go to Lhasa and see what life is like there for yourself. Here's Canadian tourist visit to Lhasa and he took the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) and explains how each carriage comes equipped with its own emergency oxygen tank. Video: Welcome to Lhasa - Exploring the City (By Vafa Anderson) youtu.be/J-TfN56ETVM He remarks how much Lhasa has changed in 10 years since he last visited. Throughout the video you can see many religious people worshipping, praying, spinning those "prayer wheels" and performing full-body kowtows on the ground.
    1
  25509.  @0x0shkosh  "神州 Shenzhou yeah because China is a divide and rule strategist huh?" China don't really care about how other countries govern themselves, the government rather focus internally on fixing our own problems. It's the Western democracies like the United States that don't care about solving internal issues, instead they redirect blame by bringing up issues in other countries, especially China. They seek to divide a unified China in the hopes that China won't be able to surpass the United States someday in the future. But many economists firmly believe that America is in decline, and China is rising, there will possibly be a time when China eventually overtakes the United States as the world's largest economy.
    1
  25510.  @ashokjain8449  "神州 Shenzhou Liberation from whom?" Liberation from imperialist forces. The first point of the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) states that: 1. The Tibetan people shall unite and drive out imperialist aggressive forces from Tibet; the Tibetan people shall return to the family of the Motherland the People's Republic of China (PRC). …… Additionally, on 1 October 1949, the 10th Panchen Lama wrote a telegraph to congratulate the liberation of the Northwest, and the establishment of People's Republic of China, he was excited to see the liberation of Tibet.
    1
  25511.  @Ming1975  Agreed. Even though the British have since "decolonised" India, many Indians are still suffering from subservient colonial mindset. The British physically vacated India in 1947, but the decolonisation of the mind still needs to happen, as many Indians still blindly worship their colonial masters. If that doesn't happen, then India will never recover from colonialism.
    1
  25512.  @bigtalor999  You're talking about U.S Guantanamo Bay?
    1
  25513. +ARJUN sharma Where does Google say that youtube is "banned" in China? Can you show me the link?
    1
  25514.  @beautanner8409  "神州 Shenzhou While you might want to reflect on some inaccuracies in your list," What inaccuracies are there in my list? Could you at least point them out for me? You said: "And from what the Uighurs themselves are saying, they'd rather not have the free 'education' (shall we say 're-education') the CCP mandates." Do you have evidence of what the Uighurs themselves are saying? Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (national language of China), Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American citizens by birth, and they learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland America. Here's a video of life of students in schools in Xinjiang Video:youtu.be/h3U-lKnMLwE Where's your evidence that the Uighurs rather not have the free education?
    1
  25515.  @beautanner8409  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    1
  25516.  @beautanner8409  You said: "For instance, the US wasn’t bombing Yemen, it was supporting the Saudis efforts to do so. After pressure from within the American government, this was ended. Not really the actions of a ‘warmonger’." So a country that literally bombs another in support of another country is somehow not undertaking the actions of a 'warmonger'? What sort of twisted logic is this? According to you, USA bombed Yemen for Saudi Arabia's sake, yet USA is not a warmonger? It just sounds like a half-baked attempt by you to excuse the U.S warmongering tendencies. You said: "(Btw If you think the Americans’ support for a brutal regime is morally reprehensible, and should be criticized, then this is an argument for rebuking and disengaging from China.)" Looks like you already know what Saudi Arabia truly is. So if USA support for a brutal regime (in your words) is morally reprehensible, then what gives the USA the right to act as a defender of human rights? USA is just applying double standards when it comes to Saudi Arabia and China that's all. "Re: Tibet - Replacing one brutal regime with another isn’t much cause for celebration." Here's a video of modern day Lhasa, Tibet, China (filmed by WildFilmsIndia) and you can see how developed Lhasa has become under communist party rule. Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, and modern technology like cars, telephone cables, computers, smartphones, WiFi, the Internet, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo (By WildFilmsIndia) Even the poorest Tibetan farmer can afford a smartphone, connect to the Internet and shop online in Taobao and have his purchases shipped all the way to Tibet in the Himalayas.Because Tibet is part of China after all.
    1
  25517.  @beautanner8409  You said: "The Co-Rapporteur noted reports of mass detention of ethnic Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslim minorities, and estimates that upwards of a million people were being held in so-called counter-extremism centres and another two million had been forced into so-called “re-education camps” for political and cultural indoctrination." Where do you get this number of 1 million Uighurs in detention? Turns out this figure came from two dubious studies, one from Adrian Zenz (a far-right anti-China activist) and another by Network of Chinese Human Rights Defenders (CHRD) which only interviewed 8 Uighurs on what they estimate the number of people detained is, and from there they extrapolated the opinions to arrive at the figure of 1 million Uighurs in detention. Journalists from the Grayzone have since exposed this: While CHRD states that it interviewed dozens of ethnic Uyghurs in the course of its study, their enormous estimate was ultimately based on interviews with exactly eight Uyghur individuals. Source: China detaining millions of Uyghurs? Serious problems with claims by US-backed NGO and far-right researcher ‘led by God’ against Beijing https://thegrayzone.com/2019/12/21/china-detaining-millions-uyghurs-problems-claims-us-ngo-researcher/
    1
  25518.  @beautanner8409  "神州 Shenzhou No: I said the US supported another country’s bombing campaign until its own government recognized what it was doing, and stopped supporting it - fundamentally different from what you just said." That's the literal definition of a warmonger (someone who supports war towards other countries) what verbal gymnastics are you attempting to do here to excuse the U.S actions? And even if you exclude Yemen War, there's still Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, etc and so on. You said: "And something that you (and those like you) seem to keep missing - those of us critical of the CCP’s actions aren’t all unreservedly on “Team America”." But apparently people like you don't belong to such a category you described, since you've been trying to come up with all sorts of excuses to excuse the U.S actions. And USA doesn't even care about its allies. The Biden administration announced the diplomatic boycott of the 2022 Beijing Olympics, and the rest of the 5 Eyes countries (Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand) hopped onboard the diplomatic boycott train. But now USA has flipped and is applying for 18 officials to attend the Olympics. Video: US applies for 18 officials to attend Beijing Olympics despite boycott announcement youtu.be/Vg3WyImPe7w This is what the other 5 Eyes nations gets for blindly following U.S on diplomatically boycotting the Olympics, only for the U.S to change its mind. The U.S is taking their allies for a ride and the rest of the 5 Eyes are blindly following.
    1
  25519.  @beautanner8409  "Finally, you attack the credibility of what you call a ‘far right researcher’ by citing an obscure, hyper-partisan left one." The Grayzone has been exposing U.S imperialist agenda through fact-checking and and quoting primary source materials. Even just reading Adrian Zenz's report, there's a graph where he compared Xinjiang's Uighur and Han Populations in Millions (1985-2018) it it turns out that the Uighur (BLUE) population in Xinjiang has been growing steadily and it was the Han (ORANGE) population that has been declining. You said: "But let’s say that Zenz’s reports, which mutually corroborates other journalism on the ground, interviews, satellite imagery, leaked documents," Journalists from the BBC and VICE have visiting Xinjiang, and they could find no evidence of 1 million Uighurs in detention. As for the Satellite Imagery, if you visit the ground coordinates of those satellite images, it turns out those coordinates correspond to ordinary civilian facilities like schools, residential apartments, logistical buildings and so on. For example: -The “detention center” (geographic coordinates: 38.8367N, 77.7056E) claimed by ASPI, is actually a gerocomium in Markit county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang -The "detention center" (geographic coordinates: 38.9950N, 77.6682E) claimed by ASPI, is actually an elementary school in Yantaq township, Markit county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang -The “detention center” (geographic coordinates: 39.8252N, 78.5501E) claimed by ASPI, is actually a logistics park in Bachu county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang _-The “detention center” (geographic coordinates: 38.9046N, 77.6153E) claimed by ASPI, is actually a middle school in Markit county, Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang_
    1
  25520.  @beautanner8409  As for Tibet, here's Canadian tourist visit to Lhasa and he took the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) and explains how each carriage comes equipped with its own emergency oxygen tank. Video: Welcome to Lhasa - Exploring the City (By Vafa Anderson) youtu.be/J-TfN56ETVM He remarks how much Lhasa has changed in 10 years since he last visited. Throughout the video you can see many religious people worshipping, praying, spinning those "prayer wheels" and performing full-body kowtows on the ground.
    1
  25521.  @mileskim1035  If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  25522.  @goliaboi  The Hong Kong extradition bill was proposed because of a certain incident. Some Hong Kong guy named Chan, brought his pregnant girlfriend to Taiwan and then proceeded to strangle her to death, and stuff her body in her suitcase, before flying back to Hong Kong, leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. Chan has since confessed to his crime, and Taiwan wanted to extradite this HK murderer to Taiwan to face justice for his crime, but Hong Kong discovered that there's no existing extradition treaty between Hong Kong and Taiwan. Furthermore, since the crime occurred in Taiwan, the Hong Kong courts are powerless to pursue justice for the victim's families. That's why Carrie Lam proposed the amendments to the Hong Kong extradition bill, in order to cover up this legal loophole. Do the protestors even know what they are protesting about? Have they read the amendment bill and understood its contents in their entirety? Now that the bill has been withdrawn, why are the Hong Kong protestors still continuing?
    1
  25523.  @youtubewatcher1555  One of the five demands is that all arrested rioters be set free and cleared of charges. Why should Hong Kong government release those rioters who resort to violence, vandalise HK public property, breaking building windows, security cameras, traffic lights, hurling petrol bombs, setting fire to shops and damaging HK MTR stations? And Carrie Lam is open to dialogue but the protestors don't even want to talk at all. That's not dialogue, that's just demands that's all. No negotiations at all.
    1
  25524.  @jeffjohnson5053  The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Source: Seventeen Point Agreement wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet.
    1
  25525. The host just combine all the news in order to make a joke for his audience. The original headline was that people who bought fever medicine were encouraged to take COVID-19 tests, but not locking down the whole building just because someone bought medicine.
    1
  25526. BRICS is about seeking win-win cooperation, whereas NATO only sees a zero sum game.
    1
  25527.  @honolulu7793  China the world's most populous country, so statistically, China has the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  25528.  @honolulu7793  Since Americans themselves choose to open up their country and welcome immigrants from all walks of life, then can't Chinese students get an education in American Universities and bring knowledge back to China if they want? It's America that choose this option to allow Chinese immigrants in the USA.
    1
  25529.  @honolulu7793  "神州 Shenzhou when did America says It's not open to Chinese." Recently, the Trump administration made it more difficult for Chinese students to study abroad in America through suspending foreign work visa programs. Trump administration introduced measures potentially banning international students if they take online classes. Ungrateful? Chinese students have contributed to the US economy and their tuition fees and living expenses contributed US$15.9 billion in 2019. This is significant given many US universities are facing financial challenges and declining domestic enrolments. Source: Uncertainty for Chinese students in the United States eastasiaforum.org/2021/01/02/uncertainty-for-chinese-students-in-the-united-states/ I'm not sure if the new Biden administration has reversed Trump's policies, the latest news is that Biden is leaving those Trump measures in place at the moment.
    1
  25530.  @honolulu7793  "神州 Shenzhou think about what China has to offer to a foreigner…" China offers foreign companies access to 1.4 billion potential customers at which to sell your product or service. In the past, China offered foreign companies a low wage labour force to set up their factories and manufacture their products cheaply and ship them back to America. Chinese workers made products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing etc cheap so that the cost of living in America is kept lower than it should be. Think about the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years, thanks to the affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent elsewhere on things like cars, housing, luxury brands, tuition fees, school fees, etc. Isn't that why many Americans often flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money to spend elsewhere?
    1
  25531.  @honolulu7793  I already mentioned that Americans gain access to affordable Chinese goods such as computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc which allows them to be save money on living expenses to spend elsewhere, like on cars, housing, luxury brands, tuition fees, etc. Which part of my argument do you not understand?
    1
  25532.  @honolulu7793  Chinese international students paid school fees in full, to get an education in America, how are Chinese ungrateful when your schools and universities receive money from China?
    1
  25533.  @honolulu7793  A foreigner living in China benefits from many things, one of which is a lower cost of living. As a developing country, the cost of living in China is (generally) lower than most developed Western countries, you can go further with your money in China than you ever could in, let's say European countries who tend to have higher cost of living.
    1
  25534. +Ryan Pattyn About Taiwan's "democracy", Taiwan was ruled by authoritarian, single-party dictatorship (KMT) for nearly its entire life. Only in 2016 (2 years ago) did another political party (DPP) finally took over KMT at the reins. But all of Taiwan's great progress and development was done under the authoritarian dictatorship of KMT. Taiwan political parties are color-coded with BLUE representing parties in favor of eventual reunion with the mainland (like KMT) and GREEN representing political parties in favor of independence (like DPP) In fact, now that DPP is elected, Taiwan's relations with the mainland are put ever more at risk because DPP is unused to dealing with the CCP unlike the KMT. Also, whatever has the people's behavior from Taiwan and the mainland even got to do with whether Taiwan is part of China? You said Taiwan care about the environment? China is the world's leader in renewable energy production, and Chinese government is planning to ban all non-electric cars in China by 2040. As of December 2017, China dominates the world of Plug-in Electric Vehicles (PEV) surpassing even USA and Europe in terms of sales and China is also home to 99.5% of the world's electric bus stocks. Source: Electric car use by country wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_car_use_by_country
    1
  25535. Arlen Tsao said "神州 Shenzhou the fact is Taiwan has been a Democracy for over 2 decades." Ever since adopting "democracy" Taiwan's economy has slowed down rapidly, and become less efficient. Much of Taiwan's great progress and industrialization occurred under authoritarian single-party KMT leadership. KMT's policies were the ones that benefit Taiwan and in fact, Taiwan had been under martial law for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. So how is that different from China's authoritarian single-party rule? The old Taiwan system worked, so why must Taiwan change to something that doesn't? Also, Arlen Tsao said "Even in the past, we were never as rude and savage as you Communist thugs." Who's the one resorting to foul language and insults here? One of your earlier comments to me is "神州 Shenzhou they all unofficially recognize Taiwan dumbass. The only reason is to please your little fat man Xi Pooh Bear so they can sell name brand shit to your shallow population." so who is the rude one here? Do I resort to abusing you with insults like what you done to me? Here is video of a fight within the Taiwan Parliament, with parliament members throwing chairs and furniture at one another. Source: Massive fight breaks out in Taiwanese parliament youtube.com/watch?v=kXmPDLRt6hA So why do you seem to think you weren't as savage as people from the mainland? Aren't you ashamed your government is reduced to this state?
    1
  25536. +Arlen Tsao You keep on saying PRC people are rude, then look at your own words addressed to me. I don't resort to hurling personal insults against you, just because your views differ from mine, but you take every opportunity to insult me and degrade me in this thread here. So who is the rude one here? Taiwan's economic growth was highest under KMT authoritarian rule. In the 1960s, the agrarian economy was replaced with light industry as small and medium enterprises started to form. From 1966 to 1980, Taiwan's economy was gradually stabilized after Chiang Ching-kuo's Ten Major Construction Projects laid the foundation in further economic developments. But then after the KMT introduced democracy and free elections, Taiwan's economy began to slowdown and Taiwan companies began losing its competitiveness. Made in Taiwan products were once well-known, but have since been replaced by Made in China products. The economy of Taiwan is "at a crossroads" and facing economic marginalization in the world economy, in addition to de-internationalization, low-paid salary to employees and uncertain outlook for personal promotion of staff, which results in human resource talents seeking career opportunities elsewhere in the Asia-Pacific region, and businesses in Taiwan suffer most from being the size of small and medium enterprises only with weaker-than-expected revenue of its hectic business operation for any consideration of further expansion, and overall impedes any attempts at economic transformation of Taiwan from the Taiwanese government. So can't you see that without your government's help, (in fact, without KMT's leadership) Taiwan's economy is suffering today? Why change from a successful system in the 1960s, to a less efficient "democratic" system today? What has "democracy" ever done for Taiwan? Since you think Taiwan is so "high tech", then why don't you name some famous Taiwan companies? China has many high tech companies like Huawei, Lenovo, Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, etc. Here is a list of the largest Internet companies in the world, and China is rapidly catching up to the USA. Source: List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies Smartphone use in China is much more widespread and advanced as compared to many other countries. In China, you can go shop online, make purchases, make payments, have them delivered to your doorstep, transfer funds, get your laundry done, book dental appointments, book doctor appointments, book a cab, pay the fare, book karaoke sessions, pay the bills, make a donation, all on your mobile phone. Source: _20 Amazing things that Chinese people do in WeChat techinasia.com/how-wechat-is-really-used-in-china
    1
  25537. +Arlen Tsao "Rude is not about words online" So you mean hurling verbal insults online is not considered rude? What sort of biased logic is this? You think that excuses yourself from being consider rude, because you are online? You keep on claiming Chinese in the mainland are rude and that in Taiwan, people are far more helpful towards the general public, then can you show proof? Here's a video about Chinese people helping Americans when they ask for directions in China. Video: How American and Chinese Treat Foreigners Differently youtube.com/watch?v=04sTkhTRmWE I mean, its clear that you biasely just hate mainland Chinese that's all, and refuse to discuss Taiwan and China's situations. You keep on saying Taiwan is high tech then why don't you name some famous companies from Taiwan that's all. China has landed our own lunar spacecraft and rover on the Moon in 2013. China is the 3rd country to send people into space, besides USA and USSR, and we are the only Asian country to have done so (surpassing Japan, Korea and Indian space agencies) In 2008, China conducted our first "spacewalk" where a Chinese astronaut (Taikonaut) exited the spacecraft Shenzhou-7 and ventured into the microgravity of space. Video: China Shenzhou 7 Space Walk Live youtube.com/watch?v=gMxQEHfU6hM In contrast, what has Taiwan achieved that makes you think "Taiwan has achieved far more than your rotten Mainland."
    1
  25538. +Arlen Tsao What about you constantly taking every opportunity to insult me and repeating your same points claiming that mainland Chinese people are rude? I don't insult you because your viewpoint is different, all I ask is for you to show some proof of Taiwan's high tech companies that's all, since you seem to think "Taiwan has achieved far more than your rotten Mainland." after all. About poverty in China, according to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat, considering that China is the world's most populous country, yet achieving 6.5% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Wikipedia: Poverty in China Of course, every country still have its own problems, China included, Taiwan included, but at least China has greatly raised the living standards of millions of people and today, China is a major driving force of the world economy and an active player of global politics. Here is a short simple 2 minute clip about the nightview of 11 Chinese cities. Video: Beautiful Night View of China 2016 youtube.com/watch?v=G7ZRa-w9xyA If you want to call this propaganda, then many mainland Chinese people are happy that our lives are much better today that it was before.
    1
  25539. +Arlen Tsao China is even capable of manufacturing our own domestic jet engines, using single crystal blades made of Rhenium superalloy. Jet engines are among world's most complex technologies and not many countries in developing world can make these engines because it is capital intensive and requires significant R & D. Video: China Makes C919 and J-20 Engines with Rhenium Superalloy youtube.com/watch?v=DnwZmDOR1Rk Jet engines have be able withstand high combustion temperatures and also built accurately to tight tolerances for best performance. Our Jet engine technology has even attracted interest from Germany, which is a country well-known for its engineering brand (aka German Engineering) Videos: China in talks for sale of jet engine technology to Germany youtube.com/watch?v=_QTS-aAqMwU As for your accusation forced tech transfers, where do you think Taiwan learned to manufacture chips? You think the people of Taiwan came up with their own ideas?
    1
  25540. +Arlen Tsao In the aviation industry, China is building our own homegrown jumbo jetliner to challenge the monopoly (or duopoly) currently held by Boeing (USA) and Airbus (EU). The Comac C919 is China's answer to the Boeing 737 MAX and Airbus A320neo, and several orders have already been made to purchase this medium sized passenger jetliner and is considerably cheaper than our Western competition Video: COMAC C919 - Chinese narrow-body twinjet airliner. History and future of the aircraft youtube.com/watch?v=axZ7YTZgcHg You can just choose to label everything I say as "Chinese propaganda" But that does not stop mainland Chinese from trying to better ourselves. I mean, if China sit back complacently and do nothing, then nothing is going to change, and the Westerners will continue to step all over Asians (like China, Japan, Korea, India, etc) Why should Asians consider ourselves inferior to Westerners? Asians are just as hardworking and intelligent as Westerners, so we should be striving to do our best and achieve similar feats as the Westerners. For example, the Jumbo Jetliner industry is currently dominated by Boeing and Airbus from America and Europe, but that does not mean Asians can't produce our own jumbo jetliner to compete with them in this industry. But if you don't try, then you'll never know what your country is capable of achieving.
    1
  25541. +Arlen Tsao If China wants to better ourselves, then we physically act and do research, built and compete to become better, and that includes in the propaganda department as well. Let's face it, Anti-China propaganda is extremely widespread in the West and they continue to demonize China as some pollution filled country with rude people and so on. Its because China is industrializing and that inevitably creates pollution. If China doesn't produce propaganda of our own, then we will surely be overrun by Western Anti-China propaganda. So why can't we fight back with propaganda of our own? I mean, the West have been polluting the Earth since 200-300 years ago (since the Industrial Revolution in 17th century) and China only recently industrialized about 30-40 years ago. So why blame China for our pollution when Westerners have done the same thing hundreds of years ago. Western countries are so powerful today, because they industrialized much earlier than other countries, and therefore have an advantage over Middle Eastern, African and Asian countries. So why can't China do the same to improve ourselves? We don't want to be left behind in technological developments. To combat pollution, China is switching to renewable energy. China built the world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam, in order to supply China with clean renewable energy to fuel our growth. Because of this, China is the world leader in renewable energy production, surpassing even USA and Europe List of countries by electricity production from renewable sources wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_electricity_production_from_renewable_sources In Solar Power, the current largest photovoltaic power station in the world is the 850 MW Longyangxia Dam Solar Park, in Qinghai, China. Wikipedia: Solar power wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power In Wind Power, China has the largest onshore wind farm, the Gansu Wind Farm. Wikipedia: Wind power wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power But of course, the giant switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy will take time, and China has only just industrialized not so long ago in 1970s. Yet China is already producing more hydroelectric power, solar power and wind power than even the long industrialized Western countries. So what does that tell you about China's determination to succeed? About Chinese music and other media, China is fast becoming a major movie market, and Hollywood movie producers are eager to tap into China's moving going audiences for profits. Because of that, Hollywood is now eager to work with Chinese film producers (like Zhang Yimou) and hire Chinese actors and actresses to star in their films (like Jing Tian, Fan BingBing, etc). Thanks to China's movie market, Hollywood is slowing introducing more Asian actors and actresses to the big screen, and helping boost their careers.
    1
  25542. +Arlen Tsao When did I ignore all the negative aspects of Mainland China? I clearly mentioned the problem of Pollution for example, and talked about why China is polluted and how the government is now switching to green energy, making China the largest producer of solar power, wind power and hydroelectricity. So why are you accuse me of such? What about Taiwan's negative aspects? I shown you a video about violent fight in Taiwan Parliament, but you just ignored it. I shown that Taiwan was ruled by authoritarian single-party KMT for nearly its entire life, but you just ignored it. You said Chinese people are rude, and I showed you a video of Westerners asking for directions in China, but you just ignored it. You keep saying Taiwan is high tech and "Taiwan is one of the strongest countries on Earth." then why don't you show proof instead of just making such sweeping claims? Where's your high tech for example? China built the world's largest radio telescope, the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) also know as Tianyan 天眼 (Eye of the Heavens) that will help scientists learn more about the universe's early days, detect low-frequency gravitational waves and hunt for signals that may have been produced by distant alien civilizations. Source: China Finishes Building World's Largest Radio Telescope space.com/33357-china-largest-radio-telescope-alien-life.html The larger the radio dish, the more sensitive it is to picking up cosmic radiation and its potential to discover an alien civilization will be 5 to 10 times that of current equipment, as it can see farther and darker planets. 2 years after its trial operation began in 2016, China's radio telescope has already identified 44 new pulsars from outer space. Source: In just two years, FAST, the world's largest single-dish radio telescope, has discovered 44 pulsars youtube.com/watch?v=176kwcS5iWk
    1
  25543. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  25544. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  25545. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  25546. Countries all over the world acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25547. Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25548. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its own constitution.
    1
  25549. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China as stated in Republic of China's own constitution.
    1
  25550. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  25551. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  25552. +Panda Bear  You don't understand, it's actually the Chinese people that hold the advantages here. It's a Chinese scientist that successfully made the world's first genetically enhanced baby after all, so China has a headstart over the other countries. Whereas in the West, public opinion would have halted gene-editing efforts and stop them from progressing in this area, so China has the advantage here. The asteroid that killed the dinosaurs, highlights just how vulnerable any species on Earth is to extinction. Who knows, maybe in the future, Homo Sapiens get wiped out by killer asteroid too! Or some disease wipes out humanity entirely. If we have the technology to produce genetically superior humans that can survive an asteroid collision of the Earth, or are immune to such diseases, then why should we not ensure the continuation of the species? You yourself admitted that humans dominate the Earth thanks to technology and now technology allows humans to potentially wipe out diseases like HIV. Don't you think its selfish of people to halt the evolution of humanity because of the belief that we are the ultimate lifeform? I mean, evolution is always ongoing and Homo Sapiens is not the first nor are we last in the chain of evolution. Who says that Homo Sapiens is the last evolution of mankind? What if a better version of ourselves comes along? Of course every racial/national wants their own kind to survive as long as possible. But it does not mean that they will survive. Look at all the primitive human tribes that are still living in the jungles and deserts of the world. They too want their culture to survive, even when they are lagging behind rest of humanity. Eventually they will assimilate into the rest of humanity as the world constantly competes for resources. And racism exists because races exist. You think humans can ever learn to live together with our different races? If through genetics, we can eliminate racism then isn't it solving one of the fundamental social problems of society? And homosexual marriages produce no offspring so how is humanity going to survive in the future? What if homosexuality really was a disease caused by a gene defect and we have to technology to cure this disease and rid humanity of it?
    1
  25553. +Panda Bear Why should no one be doing it? We have the technology but it appears its always going to still in its infancy, because nobody is allowed to work with it. If science and medicine should be learnt together for all of humanity, then why aren't scientists learning more about CRISPR other than China? China don't forbid other countries from learning about CRISPR so what exactly are we doing wrong here? "Diseases and viruses knows no political boundary." Likewise, an epidemic of a deadly disease can possibly wipe out humanity, so why can't we engineer babies with stronger immune system to resist such diseases? Do you want human race to be wiped out by disease? Look at the genocide of Native Americans, because they've been exposed for foreign viruses from the Spanish settlers of America. Their immune system never accounted viruses from the Old World, and that's why disease nearly wiped out the Native Americans. Now we have the cure to AIDS, through immunity to HIV through genetics, so why can't we continue on this research then? If the Native Americans. Since you know that a killer asteroid can wipe out most of life on Earth (including humans) at any time, then why can't humans defend against that possible scenario? If we can engineer babies with the ability to withstand killer asteriods or even a nuclear apocalypse, then why can't we do that? If lets say, the Westerners' version of a zombie apocalypse does happen, then why can't we human engineer babies with better immune systems to resist such scenarios? Imagine if you are a Neanderthal in the past and the superior Homo Sapiens comes along. Are you going to stop Homo Sapiens from reaching their full potential, just because you want to exist? Homo Sapiens is the planet-changing species, yet you want to limit their potential because of your own selfish reasons? No matter what you do, there will always be a better version of human, that will comes along and replace you. If in the future there is another species that is superior to Homo Sapiens, are you going to stop from taking over the planet? "If humanity can cure more diseases perhaps the life span of mankind will NATURALLY live longer up to about 140 years, and we will NATURALLY evolve to changing environmental conditions." What is considered NATURALLY in the first place? Don't doctors who make vaccines against smallpox and other communicable disease, make use of science and technology to administer a cure? So isn't gene-editing to grant HIV immunity, another an example of humanity curing more diseases? Humans have been vaccinating ourselves to grant immunity to certain diseases, so what's the different here? I mean, do you know how long it takes to NATURALLY acquire immunity to certain diseases? So many people have to first die of the disease, until finally a child is born with genes that enable her to become immune to the disease. Why do you want this to happen the NATURAL way, when we have the technology to switch on the immunity gene ourselves? Do you prefer millions of humans to die first, until someone is born with the correct immunity gene, then you will accept it? Like I said, Nature is just a random, spontaneous splicing of genes, removing old defects and also producing new defects at the same time, so why go through this slow, painful process? I mean, look at humanity today, and which part of us is NATURAL? Our clothes? Our buildings? Our farms? Our factories? Our powerstations? Our Genetically Modified food? Our medicine? Our vaccinations? Our radiation emitting phones? Even our contraception methods can be artificial, and babies can be fertilized in a test tube, so who are you to talk about things occurring NATURALLY? Why don't you go live out in the wilds without technology, since you want things to be NATURAL?
    1
  25554. +Panda Bear Why is it too early? How is humanity going forward if our hands are tied down? -What's the difference between vaccinations and granting immunity to HIV using gene-editing? Why hasn't there been a vaccination against AIDS then? -Where is your evidence that gene editing changes our billions year old self? Nature does gene-editing of her own every time humans procreate, so why can't we do it ourselves if we have the technology? -What threat is gene-editing to humanity? Its what Nature does all the time, and Nature doesn't know what's she's doing when she splices genes. Its all random combinations that's all. -Genes can be passed to another person, even with Nature doing it. -We won't ever know CRISPR effects, unless we conduct experiments ourselves to find them out. -Children today already drink milk formula that grants better brain development, so what's wrong with granting intelligence through genes? People today also alter their appearance through plastic surgery and if we can grant them appearances through gene editing, then isn't it more "natural" than "artificial" appearance? Also, every technology has military applications, but it doesn't stop them from being developed.
    1
  25555. +Panda Bear Who are you to speak of what the Chinese people want? According to the Wall Street Journal reports, at least 86 people have had their genes edited in China, and there is evidence of at least 11 Chinese clinical trials using CRISPR. One of those trials, the WSJ found, began a year earlier than previously reported, putting the start of the first Chinese CRISPR trial in 2015. China Has Already Gene-Edited 86 People With CRISPR gizmodo.com/china-has-already-gene-edited-86-people-with-crispr-1822297524 So who are you to speak for Chinese people? Our scientist have been experimenting with CRISPR and editing genes (with government approval too) then how is it illegal? Are you really a Chinese person or you are just pretending to be one yourself?
    1
  25556. +Panda Bear You may be of Chinese descent, but you clearly don't keep up to date with latest developments in China. Chinese government approved using CRISPR to edit-genes so you can't say gene-editing is illegal in China isn't it? Why do you feel threatened by the idea that anyone you marry could be scientifically produced? What about those babies that have been fertilized in a test tube? IVF is legal in most of the world (including China) and if that person herself isn't ashamed of it, then why should you be? I still don't understand what you mean by our species becoming extinct. Yes, Humans been around for millions of years, but that does not guarantee that our species will live forever. Just like Neanderthal were eventually replaced by Homo Sapiens, who's to say that another new species won't appear, that is superior to Homo Sapiens, and eventually replace us? Homo Sapiens is not the first nor the last, in the line of human evolution, so if a superior specimen comes along that is immune to diseases, then doesn't it deserve to spread its genes to the human genepool? I mean, I still can't understand you logic about our species becoming extinct at all. Didn't the dinosaurs become extinct by an asteriod? If we can create human being that can survive after a second killer asteroid collision on Earth, then why can't we do so to ensure the survival of the species?
    1
  25557. +Panda Bear If you can read Chinese, then it would be better to read Chinese sources as well, to get a different viewpoint of issues from a different angle. Gene therapy is indeed different from gene editing, although China did approved the first commercial gene therapy, Gendicine, in 2003 for the treatment of certain cancers. Medical history of patients is oftentimes inaccessible to the public to protect patients privacy. As for marriage there's always a bit of risk that you don't know your partner well enough before you wed, so its depends on how honest the relationship is. YouTube isn't banned in China, only blocked and people can still access YT using VPN to connect.
    1
  25558. +Panda Bear No of course not, VPN does not delve into the dark web! They are purchased legally from authorized Virtual Private Network (VPN) providers llke NordVPN, ExpressVPN, PureVPN and so on. If accessing blocked sites leads to punishments then which person in China has been punished for accessing YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, etc while in China? Frankenstein's Monster is about a dead corpse being reanimated by electricity by a Doctor Frankenstein so why are you bringing it into this discussion? How is that related to gene-edited babies? Because it really sounds like you are "anti-science" from the way you want everything to occur NATURALLY. like you kept emphasizing previously. Of course trials and tests have to be done, but who said anything about them being rushed? Also, you said you a mention that gene editing here was unnecessary, and that the chances of getting HIV was far smaller, then can you provide source to support these unsubstantiated claims? Because as far as I know, HIV is a big killer of humanity, and there are 36.9 million people living with AIDS worldwide (2017) and 940,000 people died of HIV-related illnesses worldwide in 2017. So why you still say HIV is quite manageable?
    1
  25559. Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Hua Chun Ying even elaborated how BBC is not trusted even in the UK. Video: MOFA: BBC is not trusted even in the UK youtu.be/L0oo8PsUKrA
    1
  25560.  @yslee1401  That Chilean diplomat's name is Carlos Gallo. At that time, he and his wife were visiting Beijing and they provided eyewitness accounts to the events unfolding inside Tiananmen Square in June 1989. He said that he did not observe any mass firing of guns inside the Square, and that the troops entering the square were armed with anti-riot gear (i.e truncheons and wooden-clubs). The truth is that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square June 1989, and other verified eyewitnesses (including a Reuters correspondent and a Spanish TVE television crew) said that nothing happened, other than a military troop entering the square and the students leaving the square peacefully afterwards.
    1
  25561. Did you know that the Shang dynasty was once also considered to be "myth" as well, but later scientific research proven its existence? And in 2016, there is new geological evidence uncovered that may reveal the Xia dynasty to be real. Geologic Evidence May Support Chinese Flood Legend Source:https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/08/china-yellow-river-great-flood-xia-dynasty-yu/ China finds ‘great flood’ evidence supporting myth of first emperors Source:https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/archaeology/china-finds-great-flood-evidence-supporting-myth-of-first-emperors/news-story/4aa4b85724d2fc53f608f1f65f76edbc Archaeological excavation is always ongoing and uncovering new evidence every day. But a good majority of scholars, historians (even Westerners) agree that China is among the world's oldest 'continous' civilizations still alive today. Even other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have long since faded to history. Even the Chinese written characters have been continuously in use since 1200 BC, whereas Sumerian Cuneiform, Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered dead languages today. And yes China has a bloody history of war. You can't possibly expect China to have 5000 years of history, and to have absolutely zero wars isn't it? In fact, One of the world famous thousand year old war literature, Sun Zi's The Art of War is still being taught in many military academies today. But the fact remains that China has been peaceful since 1979, and is currently not at war with any country. And since you bothered to calculate China's 3,790 wars or 1.26 wars per year then I can also say that USA fought 1032 wars from since 1775, or average 5 wars per year. So isn't USA still a worst warmonger? List of wars involving USA Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States
    1
  25562. A 2019 survey for kids showed: Most Chinese kids' dream: Astronaut Most American kids' dream: YouTuber Source: nextshark.com/survey-youtube-stars-astronauts/
    1
  25563. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25564. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25565. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25566. China is a meritocracy where politicians who fulfill their promises get elected into power. The U.S is a democracy where politicians who make the most attractive promises get elected into power.
    1
  25567. China is a meritocracy where politicians who fulfill their promises get elected into power. The U.S is a democracy where politicians who make promises get elected into power.
    1
  25568. German Chanceller Angela Merkel Served 4 terms while President Xi is only entering his 3rd term in office.
    1
  25569. President Xi is entering his 3rd term, but Angel Merkel served her 4th and Germans would have probably voted for her again in the last election.
    1
  25570. China's political system can be best described as Socialism with Chinese characteristics, applying Marxist teachings while at the same time, drawing upon thousands of years of Chinese culture and history. Communism is often stated to be the end goal of Socialism. But in China's case, the system could be heading towards something like "communism with Chinese characteristics" instead of pure communism.
    1
  25571. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25572. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25573. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  25574. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25575. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25576. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25577. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  25578. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  25579. Agreed. Politics should be about doing what's right, NOT what's popular. Sometimes, the popular thing may not be right, and the right thing may not be popular. Democracy, when reduced to its basic fundamentals, is primarily about doing what's popular, not necessarily what's right.
    1
  25580. Indeed, the U.S and EU countries cannot afford to slap sanctions on China of the same degree that they did on Russia.
    1
  25581.  @Frog1652  "simple for the 5th fleet to cut that supply" U.S Navy cutting off that supply means means that the U.S are potentially blocking their own allies (i.e Saudi Arabia) from selling oil to China. If President Xi does visit to Saudi Arabia and ink out an economic deal for China to buy more Saudi oil, then the Saudis aren't going to be happy with the U.S. Additionally, China can also step up buying oil from Russia. Already the Power of Siberia gas pipeline is supplying China with Russian gas, and there are plans for a second pipeline between Russia and China.
    1
  25582. Chinese government always stressed that India is welcome join in Belt and Road Initiative if it wants to. The OBOR is massive project that involve geopolitical concerns of many countries involved in it, so China can't afford to only cater only to India's concerns over others. Pakistan already joined the OBOR, so of course China will address its issues first, over India's who hasn't committed to the project yet. Pakistan and India been fighting over Kashmir for 70 years, so this OBOR and CPEC actually offer a rare golden opportunity for the two countries to cooperate economically instead of confronting each other and attempt to mend their relations instead.
    1
  25583. +Global Thinker China already has extensive roads in our populated areas, so what's wrong with bringing development to the poorer regions of China? Western China is noticeably poorer than Eastern China, so the government is spending money to bring some of China's wealth westward. 14th Dalai Lama was exposed to be working with CIA against China. Back in 1960s, PM Nehru granted asylum to 14th DL and his followers, so Chinese government is suspicious of India's intentions regarding Tibet. The Indian government appears to be "dangling" 14th DL just out of China's reach in Arunachal Pradesh, which is provocative action. Why Indian government doing such actions then?
    1
  25584. +Sam D In the case of Hambantota in Sri Lankan, China and Sri Lanka have come to a deal where Chinese buys the majority of the stakes, while leaving Sri Lanka in charge of port security. We run a business, not a charity drive here, and the terms of the deal are agreed upon by both Sri Lankan government and Chinese government. Regarding CPEC, it is long-term project between China and Pakistan, and once project is complete, Pakistan is expected to make money from the infrastructure to boost its economy and to slowly pay off its debt. It may take 10, 20 or even 30 years to pay off the loan, but it will be paid off eventually and the infrastructure will belong to Pakistan then. It is long term project after all, and our government does not run a charity.
    1
  25585. +Sam D What 300 year old map? Even the 1890 treaty with British isn't that old, yet you people quote Google Earth as evidence for your ridiculous claims? What makes Google Earth more reliable evidence than our maps and documents? Bhutan doesn't even have anything to show for its claims, yet India still side with it and willingly invade Chinese territory with troops? +ANUPAM RASTOGI 14th Dalai Lama has never officially renounced his claim over Tibet. If he was truly remorseful, he would have surrendered to Chinese authorities, instead of being fugitive for almost 60 years. The truth is that 14th DL is old man, and the government is waiting for 14th DL to pass on once and for all. The problem with Tibetan Buddhism is that people believe in reincarnation, and that the 14th DL may groom his own successor as the next Panchen Lama to continue his political agenda. Tibetan Buddhism suppose be above worldly affairs, yet 14th DL choose to involved himself in politics. The government wants to stop an endless repeating cycle of separatism by preventing 14th DL reincarnation. Religion is not just spirituality alone, it can be deadly tool that people used over the years to achieve their political agenda, whether its Christianism or Islam and so on. Radical Islamists hijack Islam to convince their followers to commit crimes in name of their god or for rewards in the afterlife. The government is merely taking steps to stop 14th DL from continuing his political agenda, but the government does not ban Tibetan Buddhism at all. PLA only entered Indian territory erroneously like I said earlier. Even afterwards, PLA troops withdrew after few weeks. What about Indian intrusion into Chinese territory, which has been for a month already and still ongoing? Why is POK construction illegal? Even if Chinese people didn't do the construction, Pakistan people may choose to do it themselves, or even work with other countries on projects in POK. If India truly objects to POK construction, then India is welcome to send its troops to POK to obstruct road construction like it is doing in Donglong. Who is are the ones with intense hatred towards Chinese people here? I began with "Chinese people don't want war", yet everyone responds with insults, name-calling and malicious posts. I tried to support my points with links whenever possible, but all you people do is dismiss them, calling me a fraud among other things. I deal in logic, but these Indians deal with emotions to justify their causes.
    1
  25586. +dibyendust 1. The title of the video is made by the video uploader not the Chinese diplomat and spokeperson. Why accuse me being hypocritical and biased, when you fail to even notice such details? So it's become bilateral issue between India and China? India does not claim Donglong as part of its territory, so how has building roads there become bilateral issue between India and China at all? 2. If India is so opposed to Chinese building in disputed territory claimed by India, then why doesn't India enter POK and obstruct Chinese construction? In this case, the disputed territory is between Bhutan and China, not India, so why is India voluntarily sending its forces into territory it itself does not claim for itself? India claims POK, but India does not claim Donglong, so why are its troops there? 3. First off, China doesn't want conflict, which is why Chinese officials issued many official statements, including a willingness to settle this dispute peacefully. It is much better to settle dispute through talks and issuing more official statements, then it is to not talk at all So far, Chinese government has release multiple official statements, but they have fallen on deaf ears by Indian government. Furthermore, it is India that is sending its troops into Chinese territory. Is this how India's diplomacy works? 4. You have read the Hambantota port issue wrongly. Initially, the ownership of the completed port belonged to Sri Lanka, but in order to pay off the loan, 95% of revenue generated was used. Since such a deal was unsatisfactory for Sri Lankan government, our countries worked out a new deal, in which Chinese companies owned majority stake of the port, while Sri Lanka remains in charge of security. That way, Sri Lanka doesn't have to allocate 95% revenue generated into paying loans, and Sri Lanka retains the rights of security, which proclaimed that no military vessels shall call upon the port. This is example of win-win situation that Chinese government strives for. If the deals are unsatisfactory, new terms can always be negotiated. You really think Sri Lanka is so poor that is has to sell majority stake of the port AND pay 95% of its revenue to Chinese loans? It was only one or the other, but not BOTH. 5. I did not lie about Japan not claiming any of South China Sea Islands. Japan is not a claimant to South China Sea Islands according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_disputes_in_the_South_China_Sea The Diaoyu Islands are in East China Sea, not South China Sea, which you claimed in your original post. The Diaoyu Islands were part of China before Japanese stole them from us during the war. After Japanese surrender, all their conquered territory should be returned to their owners, including Diaoyu Islands to China, isn't it? About Philippines case, the court involved was Permanent Court of Arbitration, which is not an agency of United Nations, so why should China adhere to its ruling? The correct UN agency would be ICJ, not this PCA. Furthermore, China made declaration in accordance with the UNCLOS in 2006 not to accept any of its procedures regarding territorial sovereignty. Many countries including the UK, Australia, Italy, France, Canada, and Spain made similar declarations to reject settling claims of sovereignty in this manner. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippines_v._China#Optional_exceptions_to_applicability_of_compulsory_procedure Back to Bhutan again, I thought you said it was bilateral issue between India and China, so why is India helping Bhutan against China? You changed its from being bilateral to multilateral, so exactly which what is it? If it is bilateral between India and China, then India does not claim Donglong as part of its territory, so what rights does it have to send its troops there? 14th Dalai Lama is fugitive from Chinese authorities, because of his separatist actives, while terrorists are the same for India. Both of us have these intimately involved enemies of our own, so how is this hypocrisy? Why India is allowed to protect such 14th DL from China, but China is not allowed to do the same? The best solution to this problem would be mutual exchange of fugitives, when India hands over 14th DL in return for China not vetoing. This is simply how real politics work in the world. Your Austrialian journal link does not fully show. It only tells me to subscribe. If you say I am biased, then I can also claim you are biased with your last paragraph consisting of whole string of accusations leveled at China. China is member of UNCLOS and have not broken any of its laws. Debt trap is just your own opinion, and you only highlighted Sri Lanka as your example, not various other projects by China, so who are you to keep on mocking our efforts to improve the world? I can also accuse India of attempting to prevent development to other countries by obstructing road construction, can't I?
    1
  25587. +ashish bagade Which part did I keep repeating? I simply asked for evidence to proof Bhutan's claim over Donglong is all, yet you call me CPC propagandist? The Chinese government provided multiple evidence of Donglong ownership, yet you keep rebuffing it, but fail to produce evidence support Bhutan's claim at all. Go ahead and keep on mocking me and insulting me. You are the one claiming and keep repeating "Doklam IS NOT A CHINESE TERRITORY" and without any supporting evidence. You are the one claiming China is going to war, when I keep on stating war is not beneficial for China. You claim India is prepared to pull back troops, but what are Indian troops doing in Chinese territory in first place? All you shown is your extremely poor character is all, treating my comments with disdain, dismissing them and not bothering providing evidence of your own. Are you really so interested in a real war between our countries? PLA troops will be shedding blood for lands that we claim, but Indian Army troops will be dying on foreign soil that they themselves do not claim.
    1
  25588. ANUPAM RASTOGI The government only signed agreement maintain status quo, not an agreement agreeing that it is dispute. Building a road doesn't change the status quo, as look at India having military outpost on its sided of the the tri-junction. India can maintain bases in at our borders without changing status quo, but China can't even build roads on our side? China was member of P5 of UNSC since its founding, and replacing China means that the UN charter needs to be amended. PM Nehru has clarified that India was never offered a seat in UNSC in Sept 28, 1955. PM Nehru has categorically denied any offer, formal or informal, having been received about a seat for India in the UN Security Council. He said: "The composition of the Security Council is prescribed by the UN Charter, according to which certain specified nations have permanent seats. No change or addition can be made to this without an amendment of the Charter." But Indian propaganda continue perpetuate the myth that Nehru had given up India's seat for China, to make Indians feel wronged for rejecting such an offer, when it is clear that no such offer of a seat was even given to India.
    1
  25589. +ashish bagade India is also building on DISPUTED territory Ladakh according to (thehindu.com/news/international/soft-on-pakistan-china-slams-india-for-road-construction-in-ladakh/article19553208.ece ) as the western section of China-India boundary has not been delimited and two sides have agreed to uphold peace and tranquillity before the disputes are settled. You are blame us for those same reason in Donglong, yet you also build roads in DISPUTED territory yourself for those same reasons?
    1
  25590. ashish bagade Aksai Chin is turkish word, with Aksai Chin where Aksai means "white brook" and Chin refers to China. Besides, the government has offered to cede Aksai Chin to Indian in exchange for Tawang of Arunachal Pradesh, but Indian government rejected this offer and not offered counter proposal of its own. (economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/china-ready-to-cede-land-for-part-of-arunachal-pradesh/articleshow/57440754.cms )
    1
  25591. +Games Player Excuse me but if you are referring to Doklam standoff then as far as I know, Indian MEA said that withdrawal of Indian troops almost complete, whereas Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson said "PLA will continue to patrol the area" so how exactly did China lost? Remember how India "lost" Aksai Chin territory in the first place? You are just being racist by hurling insults at Chinese people here.
    1
  25592. +Games Player Excuse me but Indian troops still withdrew from Donglong in the end. You mean that China must resort to military methods solely to remove Indian troops? What are Indian forces even doing on territory that India doesn't even claim for themselves? Also, PLA only stopped road building because of worsening weather conditions at Doklam due to the onset of winter. According to the following source, the government is resuming road construction efforts, so how exactly did India won here? Indian troops withdrew and China is still continue to build at Doklam. China expands road at Doklam again ndtv.com/india-news/just-10-km-from-last-doklam-stand-off-china-works-on-a-road-again-1759103
    1
  25593. +Games Player Go on claiming that India won without any proof to support your claim. India didn't stop Chinese government from building a road at Doklam, as shown in my previous source. You don't even have any source to support your claim that India won at all. Where is your evidence to show that Chinese government is no longer building at Donglong? You Indians are just blinded by your own arrogance on short-term benefits and ignore the strategic benefits in the long-term. For example, nothing is stopping Chinese government from continuing building the road in Donglong again in future. This article analysis the strategic long-terms consequences of the Doklam Standoff. Why India Did Not ‘Win’ the Standoff with China warontherocks.com/2017/09/why-india-did-not-win-the-standoff-with-china/
    1
  25594. +Games Player You keep claiming India won, India won, India won, but what evidence do you even have to support your claim? Chinese government is still building the road at Doklam. Indian troops have been withdrawn from Donglong so how is that a victory? You talk about Chinese people trolling, then what about you constantly chanting "India won" all the time?
    1
  25595. Games Player Excuse me but I got other things to do as well so why you expect me to reply to your posts immediately? All you seem to do is chant "India won" all the time, without understanding anything at all or supplying evidence support your claims. You claim Indian troops leave it to Bhutanese army, then where are the Bhutanese troops at Donglong? There has been no reports of Bhutan troops patrolling in Doklam, whereas PLA troops are continuing to patrol the area, as confirmed even by Indian army officials, so exactly how can you claim India won? Where is Bhutan troops at all? Also, you resort to insults such as Ping Pong, simply because you lack evidence to show that "India won" only goes to show your level of immaturity. I don't insult you as matter of character, but people like you accuse me being communist propagandist without any proof whatsoever. Why are you attacking me personally, instead of my points?
    1
  25596. Indeed. China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability.
    1
  25597. +Frank Castle Is Dead China is world's most populous country and frankly speaking China has shortage of police officers. According to the following source, China only has on average, 115 police officers to every 100,000 people. In 2006, an analysis by the United Nations indicates an approximate median of 300 police officers per 100,000, so China is below the global average. So what the government is doing is using surveillance cameras and facial recognition to make up for the shortfall in police officers. List of countries and dependencies by number of police officers wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_number_of_police_officers
    1
  25598. 说实话翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  25599. @Shinobi Vendetta Whites accounted for 64% of adults
    1
  25600. The West has had centuries in Africa to build infrastructure, whereas China has done much in just decades, to improve the lives of Africans.
    1
  25601. Many Western MSM journalists literally have their paycheck tied to the companies, and reporting the truth is no longer as important as sensationalizing (and even lying) in order to further the agenda of their corporate masters.
    1
  25602. Many Western MSM journalists literally have their paycheck tied to the corporations, and reporting the truth is no longer important.
    1
  25603.  @comradetirer  If the UN will still conduct their own investigation, then why'd they reject Russia's proposal of an investigation? What about those mass graves and the cellars filled with bodies? Shouldn't the UN want to get to the bottom of this like Russia does?
    1
  25604. @Mohammad Chowdhury What makes you think Chinese are oppressed? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationthailand.com/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more So what makes you think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  25605. English is being taught in most Chinese schools, as more Chinese learn and understand the West better. However, few American schools are willing to teach Mandarin Chinese so many Americans have little understanding of China (through the language).
    1
  25606.  @gavial1448  Mandarin Chinese is the world's most spoken language by number of speakers, and with the rise of China, it's only going to becom more important. Top 10 Languages By Number Of Native Speakers 1. Chinese — 1.3 Billion 2. Spanish — 460 Million 3. English — 379 Million 4. Hindi — 341 Million 5. Arabic — 315 Million 6. Bengali — 228 Million 7. Portuguese — 220 Million 8. Russian — 153 Million 9. Japanese — 128 Million 10. Lahnda (Western Punjabi) — 118 Million …… Source: The 10 Most Spoken Languages In The World: (babbel.com/en/magazine/the-10-most-spoken-languages-in-the-world )
    1
  25607.  @gavial1448  Learning Mandarin Chinese allows one to communicate with approximately a fifth of humanity. Located in major cities all across the world are numerous "Chinatowns" where people can appreciate Chinese culture and sample Chinese cuisine. So Chinese is clearly a useful language, and it's importance is only going to increase in the future as China's importance in the world rises.
    1
  25608.  @gavial1448  Way more useful? How? China publishes more books than any other in the world, picking up Mandarin as a 2nd language is bound to be more useful, especially as China becomes more influential: Countries by books published 1. China (440,000 books) 2. United States (304,912 books) 3. United Kingdom (184,000 books) 4. Japan (139,078 books) 5. Russia (101,981 books) 6. Germany (93,600 books) ... Source: Books published per country per year (wikipedia.org/wiki/Books_published_per_country_per_year#List_of_countries )
    1
  25609.  @rl9567  Agreed. I also don't get how the lower percentage (38%) who welcome the Pelosi's visit said it had "more advantages than disadvantages". I don't see any advantages, the U.S stance towards the One China policy remains unchanged.
    1
  25610.  @yurig2530  Rule No. 0? There's clearly no such thing. It's literally zero.
    1
  25611.  @yurig2530  But we aren't dealing with IT, we're just laying down rules in general, so it starts with Rule No. 1, not Rule No. 0.
    1
  25612. The thing is, as an American himself, didn't Cyrus Jannsen mentioned that he voted for Joe Biden over Donald Trump, during the 2020 U.S Presidential Election?
    1
  25613.    The Communist Party of China transformed China from a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into an economic juggernaut today, the world's factory, protected by world's largest land army, then what's wrong with letting the communists continue governing China? Here's a documentary entitled: China's war on poverty youtu.be/nuaJGPZCBYU that was banned on PBS for portraying China in too positive light.
    1
  25614.    Horrible atrocities have been committed by humans in the name of your God. Look at the Nazis wearing belts with the words: Gott mit uns ("God with us") sewn onto them. Watch Howard Zinn lecture on "American Exceptionalism" in MIT.
    1
  25615.    The Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia or Indonesia, promote Islam in their lands, and the Christian countries promote Christianity in theirs. Since China is officially atheist under the Communist Party of China, then can't China promote atheism in our lands, like the Muslims and Christians do in their own countries?
    1
  25616.  @whitesupremacyisracism5962  Agreed. In the USA, an increase in freedom of speech is accompanied by a decrease in taking responsibility for what's being said.
    1
  25617.  @sids2766  The Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again, which government body is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates plummeted. China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China is world's 2nd largest economy, the manufacturing hub of the world, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd largest military budget. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm And its all been achieved under single-party authoritarian CCP leadership! So what's wrong with letting the CCP guide our country into the future? China is no longer the weak, easily bullied nation we were once in the past, thanks to the CCP. Otherwise, can you prove me wrong? Why is the mainland surpassing even Hong Kong?
    1
  25618.  @1943rfagan  Communism did not kill those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong can't possibly control the weather isn't it?
    1
  25619.  @hillerm  It's tragic that that elderly woman died, but imagine how many more elderly would die if Covid-19 spreads uncontrollably throughout Shanghai. What you are describing is Shanghai local government's poor implementation of the zero Covid policy that's all, other cities in China have done a much better job of containing outbreaks.
    1
  25620.  @ryanshiflett2178  Many in the West might not have resources saved up, but it's no secret that Chinese people tend to save up money for a rainy day. The problems in Shanghai mainly stem from logistical issues, like transporting food and supplies, not from a lack of resources to purchase those food. The people in Shanghai have the money, it's just that the distribution of supplies is a concern.
    1
  25621.  @Jordan18561  "Why are the vaccination rates so low for the elderly? Doesn’t that show that they’ve actually been neglected?" Don't other countries also have this issue where elderly people refuse to get vaccinated? It's the same problem that every government in the world has to face, of how to get their elderly people vaccinated.
    1
  25622.  @kammonkam4905  "Yeah look at how Confucian Singapore handles it." Firstly, Singapore only has a population of 5 million, whereas Shanghai has 25 million, so how can you compare Singapore with Shanghai? Secondly, Singapore isn't fully ethnic Chinese, they have other races like Malays, Indians and Eurasians, so how can you claim Singapore is Confucian?
    1
  25623.  @kammonkam4905  "It is "Confucianism with China characteristics", namely talk about valuing lives but do the opposite." Confucius literally IS Chinese, what's this "Confucianism with China characteristics" you are talking about? And how is China not valuing the lives of elderly people by pursuing this dynamic zero Covid policy?
    1
  25624.  @kammonkam4905  "I am sure the policy results in a lot more deaths and suffering than what the virus does." Do you have evidence that the dynamic zero Covid policy results in a lot more deaths than what the virus does? Thanks to the zero Covid Policy, China has limited the number of Covid deaths to just 4 thousand out of a country of 1 billion.
    1
  25625.  @AnbenK  It's tragic that people died due to not being able to go to the hospital, but can you imagine how many more elderly people would die if Covid-19 cases surged in Shanghai?
    1
  25626.  @Arag0n  You can always resume making money once Covid-19 cases fall to acceptable levels. But once the elderly lose their lives to Covid, then no amount of money will bring those lives back.
    1
  25627.  @kammonkam4905  Just because only 1 person died and over 90% infected, doesn't mean that more people will die in the future. As the number of cases rises in Shanghai, it's inevitable that more deaths (especially elderly) will follow. Vast majority of deaths are in nursing homes, but the doctors, nurses, caregivers, staff, etc still have to go out right? And older folk also live outside of nursing homes, so are you saying the government should neglect those elderly as well?
    1
  25628.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou I will accept those numbers for argument's sake" So where's your proof that policy "results in a lot more deaths" than the virus? Also, what do you mean earlier variants were not very transmissible? Delta variant and earlier variants had high transmissiblity and that's why the zero Covid policy was conceived. And the zero covid policy worked in places like Shenzhen (even with omicron variant) so what makes you claim that it won't work now?
    1
  25629.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou No, we have the resources," Once again, the issue is not the lack of resources, it's the inadequate logistical distribution. Many Shanghai residents clearly have the money to buy food, it's just that the trouble arises from getting the food to them. So it's not a matter of lacking resources, but lacking the logistical infrastructure.
    1
  25630.  @kammonkam4905  "Mao's ghost still hasn't died." Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China, China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  25631.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou Are you seriously trying to debate whether Omi is a lot more transmissible than all the other variants before?" No, I'm debating what you said earlier when you said: "It was possible to contain the virus before because the variants were not very transmissive," Are you strawmanning my argument to become about whether Omicron is a lot more transmissible? Nursing homes is one thing, but how about those elderly folk living at home with their family outside of nursing homes? Elderly folk live everywhere in Shanghai not just limited to nursing homes, and their lives are just as important as elderly living in those homes. 1 person died could just be the tip of the iceberg. 90% don't have symptoms doesn't mean that elderly people aren't vulnerable to the virus all the same. Asymptomatic people can still unknowingly spread the virus to elderly folk, so can't China take necessary measures to curb the spread?
    1
  25632.  @kammonkam4905  "Yes there is always a chance that it might take some unexpected turn but there is also a chance that some more deadly virus may be lurking (cov is not the only virus) or some other disasters may be waiting." All the more reason China should observe a zero covid policy in order to minimize such a risk. The more transmission of the viruse, the more chances of a newer, deadly strain mutating. China has the world's largest population so the chances of a newer, more virulent and deadly strain emerging is higher. Just like the Delta variant originated in India, who knows if a more deadly variant might emerge from China if the virus was allowed to spread rampantly. You said: "You may get hit by a car and die if you go out. Death by traffic accidents is higher than cov" This is the fallacy of false equivalence that you are employing and you're literally comparing apples to oranges here. Why introduce unrelated comparisons in your attempts to derail the discussion?
    1
  25633.  @kammonkam4905  "Yes there is always a chance that it might take some unexpected turn but there is also a chance that some more deadly virus may be lurking (cov is not the only virus) or some other disasters may be waiting." All the more reason China should observe a zero covid policy in order to minimize such a risk. The more transmission of the viruse, the more chances of a newer, deadly strain mutating. China has the world's largest population so the chances of a newer, more virulent and deadly strain emerging is higher. You said: "You may get hit by a car and die if you go out. Death by traffic accidents is higher than cov" This is the fallacy of false equivalence that you are employing and you're literally comparing apples to oranges here. Why introduce unrelated comparisons in your attempts to derail the discussion?
    1
  25634.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou What are Xi's credentials in infectious diseases, virology and epidemiology?" As far as I know, President Xi is the only world leader to actually heed the World Health Organization's advice. Virtually all other world leaders are ignoring the WHO's advice, despite the WHO being the world's leading authority on infectious diseases, virology and epidemiology. The question should be why are other world leaders ignoring the WHO's advice?
    1
  25635.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou the old folks living alone at home are dying because they can't get medicine and medical care in lockdown." Ultimately, that's a problem of logistics and volunteers in China are helping deliver medical supplies and food to elderly living alone at home. But imagine if these old folks contract Covid-19 from unsuspecting asymptomatic people, which could have been avoided through lockdown.
    1
  25636.  @kammonkam4905  Did the WHO ever said lockdowns don't work? Dr. David Nabarro said that his comments were "taken totally out of context" and that the WHO position is consistent.
    1
  25637.  @kammonkam4905  It's clearly an apple and orange comparison, because you're applying the fallacy of false equivalence. If somehow, humans managed to reduce the risk of dying from traffic accident to zero, then there would be a comparison. But with Covid-19, other Chinese cities like Shenzhen had successfully reopened after lockdown, so this proves that you can indeed reduce case to zero (at least in China).
    1
  25638.  @kammonkam4905  You know, earlier you said: "I am sure the policy results in a lot more deaths and suffering than what the virus does." but I'm still waiting for you to prove that more than 4k people died precisely because of the policy rather than the virus itself. So far, it just seems you throw fallacies at me instead of using logical arguments.
    1
  25639.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou You keep going back to previous waves but i have replied many times that those are irrelevant." How are those irrelevant? You said: "It was possible to contain the virus before because the variants were not very transmissive," but I asked "what do you mean earlier variants were not very transmissible?" and you did not explain anything. Delta variant and earlier variants had high transmissiblity and that's why the zero Covid policy was conceived.
    1
  25640.  @kammonkam4905  "The world has learned that months ago." Most of the developed world has literally given up, and just allow their elderly folk to die, then why should China blindly follow the path the developed world is taking? You're just expecting to copy what other countries are doing and just apply it to China and expect it to work?
    1
  25641.  @topherno  Because contrary to popular world opinion, China doesn't have a vaccine mandate. Some elderly have medical conditions or a fear of taking the vaccine. The fact that 62% elderly are unvaccinated means that Shanghai needs to implement lockdown to prevent more deaths of elderly due to Covid-19.
    1
  25642.  @zyp85  "神州 Shenzhou Whataboutism at its finest." You're referring to yourself right? Since you're the one who suddenly bring up tobacco sale when this has nothing to do with it?
    1
  25643.  @Jordan18561  China with our population of 1.4 billion, has to vaccine 4x the population of the United States at 300 million, so can you really expect China to vaccinate our population? Furthermore, the United States is home to the largest number Covid-19 cases, that's one reason why their elderly have an impetus to get vaccinated. Whereas China's zero Covid policy has kept the number of deaths low, which is probably why some elderly in China don't feel the need to vaccinate.
    1
  25644. @UCLBnd7C3hbXujlWc3-VtSXw "神州 Shenzhou Hahaha, the elderly in China die from lockdown for not being able to go to hospitals and get medicine." Are you now laughing at the elderly in China dying? The coronavirus has the potential to spread uncontrolled throughout Shanghai, and potentially many more elderly will die so lockdown is the best course of action at the moment. "Also, people die. If you are 98 years old with a long list of diseases maybe you'll die anyway even without cov." But if there's a opportunity to prolong an elderly persons' life by not exposing him/her necessarily to Covid, then can't China take those precautions? I get the feeling that you don't really care about the elderly in China, as long as you can use them as an excuse to attack China's political leaders it seems.
    1
  25645. @UCLBnd7C3hbXujlWc3-VtSXw "神州 Shenzhou Hahaha, the elderly in China die from lockdown for not being able to go to hospitals and get medicine." Are you now laughing at the elderly in China dying? The coronavirus has the potential to spread uncontrolled throughout Shanghai, and potentially many more elderly will die so lockdown is the best course of action at the moment.
    1
  25646.  @kammonkam4905  Are you now laughing at the elderly in China dying? The coronavirus has the potential to spread uncontrolled throughout Shanghai, and potentially many more elderly will die so lockdown is the best course of action at the moment. "Also, people die. If you are 98 years old with a long list of diseases maybe you'll die anyway even without cov." But if there's a opportunity to prolong an elderly persons' life by not exposing him/her necessarily to Covid, then can't China take those precautions? I get the feeling that you don't really care about the elderly in China, as long as you can use them as an excuse to attack China's political leaders it seems.
    1
  25647.  @kammonkam4905  Are you now laughing at the elderly in China dying? The coronavirus has the potential to spread uncontrolled throughout Shanghai, and potentially many more elderly will die so lockdown is the best course of action at the moment.
    1
  25648.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou Hahaha, the elderly in China die from lockdown..." Are you now laughing at the elderly in China dying?
    1
  25649.  @kammonkam4905  Again, you keep hinting that the zero Covid policy killed more people than the virus does: (i.e you said: "I am sure the policy results in a lot more deaths and suffering than what the virus does.") but where's your proof? Where's your proof that more than 4k people have been killed because of Zero Covid policy than the virus?
    1
  25650.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou I don't believe the zero cov policy is about protecting the elderly since it is doing the opposite." How? If Covid-19 is allowed to spread rampant towards China, then more elderly people will die isn't it?
    1
  25651.  @kammonkam4905  "The mean age of covid death in the U.K., for example, is older than the country's life expectancy." The UK's life expectancy is 81.20 years (2019), so you're saying the mean age of Covid deaths in the U.K is older than 81 years? That's horrifying!
    1
  25652.  @kammonkam4905  Other countries in the world have also changed their definition of what constitutes a Covid-19 case too, and China is not the only one doing this. In Shanghai the latest figure is 7 deaths from Covid, so it appears that the number of deaths is increasing, so imagine how much worse it would be if Shanghai did not enter lockdown as planned. Of those 3 categories, (1) and (2) represent deaths occurring because of Covid, so if China had the opportunity to stop those people from getting Covid (i.e Zero Covid Policy) then can't China take this precaution? So do you have evidence of China using a strict criteria for deaths in (2)? Or evidence that the U.S has been too generous to inflate the number? Otherwise, these are just your own speculations that's all.
    1
  25653.  @kammonkam4905  In Shanghai the latest figure is 7 Covid deaths, so the number is gradually increasing, so imagine how much worse it would be if Shanghai did not enter lockdown as planned. Of those 3 categories, (1) and (2) represent deaths occurring because of Covid, so if China had the opportunity to stop those people from getting Covid (i.e Zero Covid Policy) then can't China take this precaution? So do you have evidence of China using a strict criteria for deaths in (2)? Or evidence that the U.S has been too generous to inflate the number? Otherwise, these are just your own speculations that's all.
    1
  25654.  @kammonkam4905  The latest figure for Shanghai is 7 deaths, so the number is gradually increasing, so can you imagine how much worst it would be if Shanghai didn't enter lockdown as planned?
    1
  25655.  @kammonkam4905  Of those 3 categories, 1 and 2 represent deaths occurring because of Covid, so if China had the opportunity to stop those people from getting Covid (i.e Zero Covid Policy) then can't China take this precaution? Also do you have evidence of China using a strict criteria for deaths? Otherwise it just appears to be your own speculation without proof.
    1
  25656.  @kammonkam4905  Of those 3 categories, if China had the opportunity to stop those people from getting Covid (i.e Zero Covid Policy) then can't China take this precaution? Also do you have evidence of China using a strict criteria for deaths? Otherwise it just appears to be your own speculation without proof.
    1
  25657.  @kammonkam4905  Also, why were you laughing at the elderly in China dying?
    1
  25658.  @kammonkam4905  So if the mainland experts were advising Hong Kong, then what makes you seem to think those mainland experts don't do the same for Beijing? No matter how mild you think Omicron is, death is still death. Can't China pursue a strategy that will minimise unnecessary deaths from Covid? Like I said, once the elderly lost their lives, no amount of money can bring their lives back.
    1
  25659.  @kammonkam4905  I mean, earlier you mention nursing homes, that the residents don't leave those homes even though the doctors, nurses, staff, etc do. If those nursing staff fall sick until there's a shortage of staff, then who's going to take care of the elderly in those homes? And how about those elderly living outside of those homes? Aren't those lives just as important as those in those homes?
    1
  25660.  @kammonkam4905  You've repeatedly said that the policy allegedly does more harm than the virus, but where's your actual proof?
    1
  25661.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou Then just test the staff and whoever enter the nursing homes." It's not as simple as you make it out to be. If enough nursing staff tested positive then there'll be shortage of nursing staff to tend to those resident. And you still haven't answered what about those elderly living outside of those homes, you really think you're fit to govern Shanghai, a city of 26 million people, with such simplistic thinking?
    1
  25662.  @kammonkam4905  While it's tragic that elderly may not get access to medication, like I said earlier, imagine how much worst it will be if Shanghai had not entered lockdown as planned. So I take it you have no actual proof that the policy harms more than the virus itself? Also if elderly have other existing medical issues, then isn't preventing their exposure to the virus a necessary precaution?
    1
  25663.  @kammonkam4905  Shortage of nursing staff occurs when people test positive and are unable to care for elderly in the home. By locking down, the staff get minimise contact with outside and are less likely to test positive because of exposure.
    1
  25664.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou The lockdown has been how long now? 3 weeks?" That's already far shorter then the Wuhan lockdown that lasted the 2 months, so Shanghai's case is not the longest, if judging by your standards. But imagine how many elderly lives are saved thanks to the Shanghai lockdown.
    1
  25665.  @kammonkam4905  I'm still waiting for your actual evidence that the policy "results in a lot more deaths" than the virus. It's like you don't even have proof of your claims, yet you're behaving like an "armchair governor" thinking that you can govern a city of 26 million better than the actual Shanghai governor.
    1
  25666.  @kammonkam4905  I'm still waiting for your actual evidence that the policy "results in a lot more deaths" than the virus. It's like you're behaving like an "armchair governor" thinking that you can govern a city of 26 million better than the actual Shanghai governor.
    1
  25667.  @kammonkam4905  You've repeatedly said that the policy allegedly does more harm than the virus, but where's your actual proof?
    1
  25668.  @kammonkam4905  I am simply asking for proof to substantiate your claim that the policy results in a lot more deaths than the virus, and thus far, you've provided none. I've acknowledged that there have been elderly denied access to medication, but that's a problem of logistics and can be solved through better distribution networks in Shanghai. But imagine how worst it would be if Shanghai did not enter lockdown as planned.
    1
  25669.  @Jordan18561  Contrary to popular world opinion, China does not enforce a vaccine mandate, so elderly people in China may choose not to vaccinate, either for medical reasons or simply out of fear of the vaccines. This is in contrast to Western countries like Canada where there are truckers protesting over compulsory vaccine mandates. Another reason is that China has contained Covid-19 so well, that many elderly don't really see the need to vaccinate, whereas in USA there is high elderly vaccination rate, because the U.S government allowed the virus to spread uncontrollably, so it's possible that elderly Americans feel the need to vaccinate.
    1
  25670. @Swarmpope Which young is being sacrificed? Who is going to teach the young if the old are gone?
    1
  25671.  @Jordan18561  Right now, the priority is to reduce the surge in Covid cases in Shanghai. Vaccinating the elderly takes months to develop sufficient levels of antibodies, so the best course of action is lockdown Shanghai in order to reduce the number of cases. Loss of income is regrettable, but money can already be earned again. Whereas lost of lives cannot be undone.
    1
  25672.  @kammonkam4905  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  25673.  @Jordan18561  Most East Asian countries like Japan, Korea, as well as South East Asian countries have a culture of smoking and it's difficult to wean off. Smoking is a generation habit, and the way to tackle it is to educate the young to be aware of its harmful effects.
    1
  25674.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou How pathetic is it that Chinese still mouth off Confucius in 2022 with pride?" Confucianism is part and parcel of Chinese culture, can't Chinese take pride in our culture? Confucius teachings have spread across Asia since 500 BC and even the First Chinese Emperor, Qin Shihuangdi, tried to eliminate Confucian teachings and scholars, yet the philosophy has survived for thousands of years to modern times. Then can't Chinese take pride in our cultural heritage?
    1
  25675.  @kammonkam4905  Chinese scholars have been recording history and our historical archives have the names of all 600+ rulers of China, dating all the way back to the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors (三皇五帝) (2852–2070 BC). Here's a list of leaders during that period: 3162–2962 BC Yǒucháo (有巢) 2962–2852 BC Suìrén (燧人) 2852–2737 BC Fúxī (伏羲) 2737–2698 BC Yándì (炎帝) 2698–2598 BC Huángdì (黃帝) 2597–2514 BC Shǎohào (少昊) 2514–2436 BC Zhuānxū (顓頊) 2436–2366 BC Dìkù (帝嚳) 2366–2358 BC Dìzhì (帝摯) 2356–2255 BC Dìyáo or Táng Yáo (帝堯 / 唐堯) 2255–2208 BC Dìshùn or Yú Shùn (帝舜 / 虞舜) ... Then there's rulers of Xia dynasty (夏朝) (2070–1600 BC) 2150–2106 BC Yǔ (禹) 2106–2077 BC Qǐ (啟 2077–2048 BC Kāng (康 2048–2036 BC Kāng (康) 2036–2008 BC Xiāng (相) .... (the rest of China's history) ... Egypt and Mesopotamia are also ancient civilizations with their own forms of writting like Egyptian Hieroglyphs and Sumerian Cuneiform respectively. Likewise, Chinese characters have been in use since 1200 BC and constitute among the oldest continuously used system of writing in the world. Even today, Mandarin Chinese is the most spoken language in the world by number of speakers, whereas Egyptian Hieroglyphs and Sumerian Cuneiform are "dead" languages and have since fallen into disuse.
    1
  25676.  @kammonkam4905  It was the Mongolian Kublai Khan (descendant of Genghis Khan) that choose to abandon his Mongolian nomadic ways and adopt Han Chinese culture, proclaiming himself Emperor of Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu conquerors of China also eventually assimilated into Chinese culture during the Qing Dynasty. Otherwise, why are those dynasties known as Yuan 元 and Qing 清 instead of just Mongolian Empire and Manchu Empire?
    1
  25677.  @kammonkam4905  The Yellow Emperor and other rulers are part of Chinese history regardless, so how am I wrong in saying that China has 5,000 years of history? At one stage, the Shang 商 Dynasty (1600 - 1046 BC) was also considered mythical, until the uncovering of archaeological evidence like the Oracle Bone script during scientific excavations during the 1920s and 1930s, proved that the Shang Dynasty was real and not myth. The Xia 夏 Dynasty (2070 - 1600 BC) is largely considered mythical today, but in 2016, scientists had found evidence of a catastrophic flood that overwhelmed the upper Yellow River valley in China some 4,000 years ago, which could serve as evidence that the Xia Dynasty really existed. Archaeological excavations are always ongoing and uncovering more evidence of China's past that could lend truth to myth, so just because there's no evidence now, doesn't mean there won't be in the future.
    1
  25678.  @kammonkam4905  But the Yuan Dynasty is still Chinese, they literally call themselves Yuan 元 Dynasty instead of Mongolian Empire. Kublai Khan choose to abandon his nomadic Mongolian ways and sleep under a permanent shelter in the Chinese Palace. Whereas Genghis Khan purportedly never slept under a permanent shelter his entire life. During the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) they may have regarded Manchurians as foreigners, but today under the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, Manchu are one of the 55 ethnic groups in China.
    1
  25679.  @Jordan18561  You're comparing apples to oranges (just like kammon kam) if you think that you can compare smoking with Covid-19, or traffic accidents with Covid-19, this is the fallacy of false equivalence that people use because they can't refute the points brought up.
    1
  25680.  @kammonkam4905  The Yellow Emperor story wasn't constructed later. Before the invention of writing, people pass down stories orally, through stories passed down from generation to generation and that's how history was recorded before the invention of writing. Once again, I'm saying that what people consider myth today, might turn out to be true in the future once archaeological evidence is uncovered. The Shang Dynasty was once mythical until the 1920s when excavations uncovered evidence. Likewise the Xia Dynasty is considered myth, but there's some archaeological evidence uncovered in 2016.
    1
  25681.  @kammonkam4905  The Yuan was Chinese, for reasons stated above. Kublai Khan abandoned his nomadic traditions and slept under a permanent roof in the Chinese palace, whereas Genghis Khan purportedly never slept under a permanent roof his entire life. And while the Romans copied a lot from the Greeks, but the Chinese are still Chinese, so what's your comparison?
    1
  25682.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou Yeah right all creation myths were passed down orally at some point by story tellers so they must all be historical." You're deliberately twisting my words. I'm saying that before the invention of writing, people passed down their history orally (that was how they remembered history) so the Yellow Emperor story wasn't constructed after the invention of writing. And what's considered myth today, might turn out to be real once archaeological evidence is uncovered in the future. In the 1900s, Shang Dynasty was a myth until 1920s when excavations revealed Shang Dynasty archaeological evidence. Likewise, in 2016, there's archaeological evidence of a massive flood that might prove the existence of the Xia Dynasty.
    1
  25683.  @kammonkam4905  When the Mongols conquered China during Yuan Dynasty, much of the running of the empire fell on the shoulders of Han Chinese. For example, who grows the food needed to feed the Empire? The Mongols were nomads who lived off the land, so it was left to Han farmers to grow food to feed the empire. -Who planned the towns and built houses during Yuan dynasty? The Mongols lived in temporary housing (yurts) their entire lives, so it was up to the Han architects and builders to construct permanent roofs over citizens heads. -Who tended to the administrative duties of the empire? The Mongols know hardly anything about bureaucracy, so it was left to Han bureaucrats to ensure the day-to-day affairs of the Yuan Dynasty was kept running smoothly. The Mongols were nomadic tribesmen who conquered and plundered other nations, it was Han that ensured the Empire was running smoothly.
    1
  25684.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou I don't see how women were subujated in Western history or today has anything to do with the conversation." Did I ever said women were subjugated in Western history or today? I just pointed out it was occurring all throughout the ancient world, during the period when Confucius lived. "It is you who said that Confucianism is the core of Chinese-ness we must embrace it" When did I ever said this? I never even used the word "core" at all in this post, so why are you putting words in my mouth?
    1
  25685.  @Jordan18561  Because you're comparing apples to oranges, that's why it's the fallacy of false equivalence. I've already explained it above in one of my posts to kammon kam.
    1
  25686.  @kammonkam4905  The Mongol Kublai Khan had proclaimed himself Emperor of China, and he adopted Han culture, sleeping under a permanent roof in the Imperial Palace, unlike Genghis Khan who was nomadic. But in truth, the Mongols didn't know how to grow food to feed the empire, how to build permanent houses, how to run the empire, so it was left to Han farmers, builders and bureacrats to continue running the Yuan Dynasty. So Yuan was run by Chinese.
    1
  25687.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou 'Might turned out to be real' is not real." Again, the Shang Dynasty was initially considered not real during 1900s and earlier. But in 1920s and 1930s, archaeological evidence proved that the Shang Dynasty existed. And in 2016 (just 8 years ago) archaeological evidence of massive flooding that occurred 4000 years ago during the Xia Dynasty adds credence to the existence of that dynasty. It's like you can't refute my points, so you just make fun of my points instead of seriously countering my arguments.
    1
  25688.  @Jordan18561  This is what I wrote to kammon kam: "It's clearly an apple and orange comparison, because you're applying the fallacy of false equivalence. If somehow, humans managed to reduce the risk of dying from traffic accident to zero, then there would be a comparison. But with Covid-19, other Chinese cities like Shenzhen had successfully reopened after lockdown, so this proves that you can indeed reduce case to zero (at least in China)."
    1
  25689.  @Jordan18561  "神州 Shenzhou I asked specifically about smoking. Is this a false equivalency?" Yes, it's a false equivalency.
    1
  25690.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou hahaha I am Chinese but I can't stand nationalistic bs from anyone, Chinese included though not exclusively. I also can't stand U.S nationalism." Which country are you from? Isn't nationalism is the glue that holds the people of a nation together? America has patriotic slogans like "America First!", "Make America Great Again!", "God Bless the United States!" because who else is going to believe in America if not the people? If Americans themselves lose hope in USA, then it's spells the end of the country without nationalism You said: "I treat China just like any county. I praise it for what it does right such as trying to eliminate poverty and I criticize what it does wrong." But who is to define what is "right" and "wrong" for China? China is pursing a course that it deems correct, and is making corrections if necessary. It is China's deeds (i.e eliminating poverty) that speak for itself. But deeds take time to yield results. Over 40 years ago, people would laugh if China proposed eliminating poverty, but fast forward today, and China is on track to become a moderately prosperous society by perhaps 2030.
    1
  25691.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou so there was a flood so Noah's Ark was real? Now you sound like an evangelical Christian." Why do you keep on misinterpreting my words? I never said anything about Noah's Ark, you just throw in Noah's Ark in order to derail my argument, which is about the 2016 uncovering of geological evidence of a flood that occurred 4,000 years ago, possibly lending credence to the existence of the mythical Xia Dynasty. The geological evidence is published on 2016 in NatGeo: Geologic Evidence May Support Chinese Flood Legend. Yet you're now comparing me to an evangelical Christian, when I'm citing scientific articles? I also pointed out Shang Dynasty was once considered mythical in 1900s, until archaelogical excavations in 1920s and 1930s proved its existence. I'm merely saying that what is considered myth today, may become truth tomorrow if sufficient archaeological evidence is uncovered. But you seemingly can't refute my point, so you bring up Noah's Ark again and again, and try and superimpose it onto Xia Dynasty.
    1
  25692.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou so there was a flood so Noah's Ark was real? Now you sound like an evangelical Christian." Why do you keep on misinterpreting my words? I never said anything about Noah's Ark, you just throw in Noah's Ark in order to derail my argument, which is about the 2016 uncovering of geological evidence of a flood that occurred 4,000 years ago, possibly lending credence to the existence of the mythical Xia Dynasty. I also pointed out Shang Dynasty was once considered mythical in 1900s, until archaelogical excavations in 1920s and 1930s proved its existence. I'm merely saying that what is considered myth today, may become truth tomorrow if sufficient archaeological evidence is uncovered.
    1
  25693.  @kammonkam4905  You said: " I think Xi is a pompous, uneducated windbag with a big chip on his shoulder who is also a control freak, a very bad combination" You said he's pompous, but could you elaborate why? There's plenty of videos of President Xi being down to earth, such as visiting poor villages in Shaanxi, Sichuan, Zhejiang, and inquiring with local villagers on the poverty alleviation efforts. Having come from a background of being sent to work in the countryside, Xi understands how the poor people feel and vows to make life better for the people. Xi Jinping's education was cut short by the Cultural Revolution. The misfortunes and suffering of his family in his early years hardened Xi's view of politics. During an interview in 2000, he said, "People who have little contact with power, who are far from it, always see these things as mysterious and novel. But what I see is not just the superficial things: the power, the flowers, the glory, the applause. I see the bullpens and how people can blow hot and cold. I understand politics on a deeper level." From 1998 to 2002, Xi studied Marxist theory and ideological education in Tsinghua University, graduating from there with a doctorate in law and ideology in 2002. A windbag? Xi has around 30-40 years of political experience, having rose through the communist ranks and governed over several cities and provinces of China. The Belt and Road Initiative was Xi's birth child, attempting to connect China to Europe (and the countries in between) in order to provide development to those landlocked countries, as well as project China's influence throughout Eurasia. A chip on his shoulder? Against whom or what does Xi hold a grudge against?
    1
  25694.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou The Romans copied almost everything from the Greeks..." What is your point when you keep on bringing up Romans and Greeks? It's like you can't refute my point about Yuan Dynasty being Chinese (for reasons stated above) and you are trying to use Romans and Greeks to derail my argument (like what you did with Noah's Ark). You want to publish a paper about Romans and Greeks, then be my guest, why are you telling me all this just because you can't refute my point about Yuan Dynasty?
    1
  25695.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou You are quite dense, aren't you?" More insults. The Romans called their empire the Roman Empire, but Kublai Khan called their empire Yuan (元) Dynasty instead of the Mongolian Empire. I've already explained in detail above how Yuan was Chinese, but you can't refute my points so you just bring up Romans and Greeks and tried to derail the discussion.
    1
  25696.  @kammonkam4905  What's the name of this 98 years old woman you spoke of?
    1
  25697.  @Jordan18561  You asked: " Is this a false equivalency?" and I replied: "Yes, it's a false equivalency."
    1
  25698.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou So the Romans copying the Greeks wholesale didn't make them Greeks, but the Mongolians were Chinese even though the Yuan dynasty treated Chinese legally as third and forth class citizens," Did I ever said that the Mongols were Chinese? I did said Yuan Dynasty was Chinese, but did I ever said the Mongols were Chinese? Could you please quote me my words saying Mongols were Chinese? "because they used the word "Yuan" (which could be a translation from Mongolian by Chinese historians, they had their own writing system)" Do you have proof it was a translation from Mongolian? In 1271, Kublai Khan imposed the name Great Yuan (大元) establishing the Yuan dynasty. "Dà Yuán" (大元) is from the clause "大哉乾元" (Great is Qián, the Primal') in the Commentaries 《十翼》 on the Classic of Changes 《易經》 section regarding the first hexagram Qián (乾). Mongolia (or Outer Mongolia) today uses mostly the cyrillic alphabet imported from Russia, whereas Inner Mongolia in China has preserved the Mongolian written language among the ethnic Mongols living in the region. "According to your logic Japanese are Chinese too," You have this habit of constantly twisting my words again. All I said was that Yuan Dynasty was Chinese, when did I ever said Japanese or Mongols are Chinese? You literally can't refute my original point, so you constantly try and derail the topic.
    1
  25699.  @kammonkam4905  "神州 Shenzhou My bad, she is 94 instead of 98." What's the name of this 94 year old woman? Shanghai is so big and there are so many elderly living there. "I can't post the link or any Chinese search string or YT deletes my reply." I can post Chinese characters just fine. If YT deletes your reply, does that mean that censorship does exist even on a Western platform like YT?
    1
  25700.  @Jordan18561  You too.
    1
  25701. "神州 Shenzhou so there was a flood so Noah's Ark was real? Now you sound like an evangelical Christian." Why do you keep on misinterpreting my words? I never said anything about Noah's Ark, you just throw in Noah's Ark in order to derail my argument, which is about the 2016 uncovering of geological evidence of a flood that occurred 4,000 years ago, possibly lending credence to the existence of the mythical Xia Dynasty. The geological evidence is published on 2016 in NatGeo: Geologic Evidence May Support Chinese Flood Legend. Yet you're now comparing me to an evangelical Christian, when I'm citing scientific articles? I also pointed out Shang Dynasty was once considered mythical in 1900s, until archaelogical excavations in 1920s and 1930s proved its existence. I'm merely saying that what is considered myth today, may become truth tomorrow if sufficient archaeological evidence is uncovered. But you seemingly can't refute my point, so you bring up Noah's Ark again and again, and try and superimpose it onto Xia Dyna
    1
  25702. "神州 Shenzhou so there was a flood so Noah's Ark was real? Now you sound like an evangelical Christian." Why do you keep on misinterpreting my words? I never said anything about Noah's Ark, you just throw in Noah's Ark in order to derail my argument, which is about the 2016 uncovering of geological evidence of a flood that occurred 4,000 years ago, possibly lending credence to the existence of the mythical Xia Dynasty. The geological evidence is published on 2016 in NatGeo: Geologic Evidence May Support Chinese Flood Legend. Yet you're now comparing me to an evangelical Christian, when I'm citing scientific articles? I also pointed out Shang Dynasty was once considered mythical in 1900s, until archaelogical excavations in 1920s and 1930s proved its existence. I'm merely saying that what is considered myth today, may become truth tomorrow if sufficient archaeological evidence is uncovered. But you seemingly can't refute my point, so you bring up Noah's Ark again and again, and try and superimpose it onto Xia Dyna
    1
  25703. "神州 Shenzhou so there was a flood so Noah's Ark was real? Now you sound like an evangelical Christian." Why do you keep on misinterpreting my words? I never said anything about Noah's Ark, you just throw in Noah's Ark in order to derail my argument, which is about the 2016 uncovering of geological evidence of a flood that occurred 4,000 years ago, possibly lending credence to the existence of the mythical Xia Dynasty. The geological evidence is published on 2016 in NatGeo: Geologic Evidence May Support Chinese Flood Legend. Yet you're now comparing me to an evangelical Christian, when I'm citing scientific articles? I also pointed out Shang Dynasty was once considered mythical in 1900s, until archaelogical excavations in 1920s and 1930s proved its existence. I'm merely saying that what is considered myth today, may become truth tomorrow if sufficient archaeological evidence is uncovered.
    1
  25704.  @wwind20  "It is ture but I guess the healthy issue and death caused directly by lockdown already overwhelm the death caused by virus itself," Where's your evidence that deaths caused directly by lockdown already overwhelm the deaths caused by the virus? Can you imagine how much worst the situation would be if Shanghai had not entered lockdown as planned?
    1
  25705. Enemy? China today is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  25706.  @TSemasFl  But many 2nd and 3rd generation Asian Americans were literally born in the United States and they regard America as their home. It's just like telling African Americans to go somewhere else, even though their ancestors were African slaves brought to America.
    1
  25707.  @TheFivegoodemperors  China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank has commanded healthy respect from international observers, as its performance parameters are equal to many top Western designs (like the Russian T-90 and the US M1 Abrams), and the Type 99 also packs a few unique tricks of its own. Source: China's Deadly Type 99 Tank vs. Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/chinas-deadly-type-99-tank-vs-russias-t-90-americas-m-1-17836 China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank was even featured in our 70th anniversary National Day parade. Video: China's new generation main battlefield tanks revealed in National Day Parade youtu.be/Ec4Bu2orKTk
    1
  25708.  @TheFivegoodemperors  China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) held an amphibious landing drill off the southern Chinese coast to demonstrate our amphibious warfare capabilities. Video: China's army holds amphibious force sea landing drill youtu.be/Us4805xdhy8 Amphibious assault vehicles practiced seaborne landings with fire support, the brigade organised multiple landings. Different detachments synchronised their battle formations and launched strikes at core positions.
    1
  25709.  @TheFivegoodemperors  Our amphibious assault vehicles aren't "sitting ducks" while crossing waters, they can even open fire at land targets while still in the water. Video: 共军ZTD-05两栖突车 ZTD-05 Amphibious Assault Vehicle youtu.be/fhF5YALpaFA?t=55
    1
  25710. blazednlovinit Money also goes back to other countries in other ways. Chinese tourists visit other countries to spend money on shopping, often buying expensive foreign branded goods like Rolex, Louis Vutton, etc which are big in China compared to local brands. Apple iPhone is still more prestigious than Chinese brands like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, etc. (Oppo was named because it sounds similar to Apple to Chinese people) So foreign companies have also benefited from entering Chinese markets.
    1
  25711. blazednlovinit It is no secret that Western countries enjoy exceptional number of privileges and often have extremely high taxes as result as compared to other countries. Also, it is generally difficult to retract a freedom right, once it has been granted by the government. For example, in USA they are experiencing trouble with the amendment that grants US citizens the right to bear firearms. Americans are unwilling to give up their rights to guns and because of this, crimes like robbery are much easier to commit in USA. It's more common to encounter robbers with guns in USA and it makes the job of enforcement much more difficult and risky. In the same way, the Chinese government is reluctant to grant more rights than necessary as it will be much more difficult to retract them afterwards. Already, Chinese workers are receiving somewhat higher wages than previously and Chinese goods are facing competition from other low labour cost countries like Vietnam and India.
    1
  25712. blazednlovinit Then how do you propose to solve the problem then? Are Americans willing to work for same low wage as Chinese? Otherwise this trade deficit that you keep on mentioning for past few comments will still continue to grow in future.
    1
  25713. blazednlovinit Many countries have often threatened to impose sanctions on Chinese goods entering their country or to even boycott Chinese goods entirely. But in the end, demand for Chinese goods remains high and nobody's government follow through with implementing said sanctions. The money people have saved on living expenses thanks to Chinese goods can go towards buying more expensive local products like housing, cars, and other luxury products made locally, so it is not as though that buying Chinese goods means that they automatically don't spend on local goods and services.
    1
  25714. It'll probably be something like a Ukrainian government-in-exile that joins NATO.
    1
  25715.  @gepimu  Yes, but the advantage is that you can make use of the convenience of e-payment and mobile payment services with digital Yuan.
    1
  25716.  @gepimu  Hey man, if China can someday surpass the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this eventual goal of ours? Nobody said USA has to be on top all the time, if China can potentially surpass the USA some day in the future, then we should work towards it. I mean, the 19th century belonged to Britain as a colonial superpower. But during the 20th century, Britain was eventually overtaken by the USA after WWII, as the global superpower. Who knows, the 21st century might belong to China.
    1
  25717.  @pafry6432  Why not? Looking at the current situation, China is actually among the safest places in the world from Covid-19 today, so why wouldn't people want to come to China?
    1
  25718.  @anthonyluisi7096  You do realise that the government that controls others through currencies the most is the U.S government with the U.S dollar right? While you accuse China of potentially controlling people through digital currency, the USA is weaponizing the U.S dollar through sanctions to control other countries.
    1
  25719. Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to our lands as visitors (just ask the expats). However, many Westerners are increasingly regarding Chinese in their lands with suspicion.
    1
  25720.  @sjelucten7150  Yes, that he has. But Cyrus is still an American himself, so it's better for him to focus on improving his own country, the United States, and leave China to Chinese people. I mean, say hypothetically, that I as a Chinese, married an American wife and have 2 half American children, surely that doesn't give me the right to tell Americans how to run their country.
    1
  25721. China is rolling out digital currency backed by gold. Meanwhile the U.S is printing U.S dollar backed by nothing.
    1
  25722.  @zilun  Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. Source: White Terror (Taiwan) wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Terror_(Taiwan) But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 – 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 – 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 – 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 – 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Source: Taiwan Miracle wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_Miracle Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest.
    1
  25723.  @zilun  The KMT transformed Taiwan and rapidly modernised the island under its single-party leadership. Why Taiwan replace their battle-hardened and politically experienced KMT government with the green and inexperienced DPP political party? Taiwan actually thrived under authoritarian rule, why introduce democracy? Because Westerners said so? Why fix a system that isn't broken? Look at China under 70 years of Communist Party rule and look how advanced China has become. China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours.
    1
  25724.  @zilun  How was China doing before? Before the communists came to power, China was dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country under KMT rule. When Dr Sun overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  25725.  @zilun  Taiwan's manufacturing tech was made possible because of authoritarian single-party KMT rule (like I explained before) not because of "democracy." And under the DPP, Taiwan's economy is entering a slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising and unemployment is forcing Taiwan graduates to seek employment opportunities abroad, such as in mainland China or Singapore. Video: How Taiwan Lost its Roar and its Young Talents youtu.be/P3BCnPb8qHY "From the 90s, there were more bipartisan disagreements in policy making that were less effective. This is one. Secondly, the ruling officials tend to be conservative in nature and do not enthusiastically push to liberise and globalise the island." - Ray Chou, Academia Sinicia.
    1
  25726.  @zilun  Take smartphones for example, Chinese smartphone companies dominate the 2019 Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands according to the following source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are all the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland, you tell me? How can Taiwan compete with the sheer economic power of the mainland?
    1
  25727.  @zilun  About financial institutions, China is home to many of the world's largest banks including ICBC, China Construction Bank, AgBank, Bank of China, Bank of Communications, Postal Savings Bank of China, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank (China), Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, China CITIC Bank, China Minsheng Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Hua Xia Bank, Bank of Beijing, and so on. Source: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks#By_total_assets But where are the famous financial institutions in Taiwan as opposed to the mainland?
    1
  25728.  @zilun  Innovative capability? As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  25729.  @zilun  China publishes more scientific research papers than any other country in the world. For the first time, China has overtaken the United States in terms of the total number of science publications, according to statistics compiled by the US National Science Foundation (NSF). Source: China declared world’s largest producer of scientific articles nature.com/articles/d41586-018-00927-4 The agency’s report, released on 18 January, documents the United States’ increasing competition from China and other developing countries that are stepping up their investments in science and technology.
    1
  25730.  @zilun  About global competitiveness in China, every day there are so many businesses startups growing in China. China has the world's largest number of "unicorns," privately-held start-up firms valued at more than $1bn (£771m), according to a new report. Source: China has more 'unicorn' start-ups than the US bbc.com/news/business-50134460 The country has produced 206 unicorns while the US has 203, the China-based Hurun Institute reported. Together the two countries are home to more than 80% of the world's unicorns.
    1
  25731.  @zilun  China has produced many successful Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, ZTE, LENOVO, DJI, Haier, Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, NetEase, Meituan-Dianping, Bank of China, ICBC, AgBank, China Construction Bank, Ping An Insurance, Sinopec Group, China National Petroleum, China Minmetals, China State Construction, and the list goes on. Many of these companies have successfully made it onto business magazines like Forbes Global 2000 and Fortune Global 500 Sources: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies Forbes Global 2000 wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Global_2000 Fortune Global 500 wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_Global_500 But where are all the famous companies from Taiwan you tell me? How can Taiwan possibly hope to compete with the sheer economic might of the mainland?
    1
  25732.  @zilun  Why can't you name me any banks from Taiwan, that are as well known as from mainland China? 4 of the Top 10 Banks in the World belong to mainland China, and none from Taiwan. The 10 Biggest Banks in the World 1. Industrial & Commercial Bank of China (Chinese) 2. China Construction Bank Corp. (Chinese) 3. Agricultural Bank of China (Chinese) 4. Bank of China (Chinese) 5. HSBC Holdings (British ) 6. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (American) 7. BNP Paribas (French) 8. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (Japanese) ... Source: The 10 Biggest Banks in the World investopedia.com/articles/investing/122315/worlds-top-10-banks-jpm-wfc.asp But where are the famous banks from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland, you tell me?
    1
  25733.  @zilun  India is world's largest democracy, yet look at how far China has advanced without democracy, as opposed to India with democracy? Granted, the Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, Europe, USA and India. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  25734.  @zilun  You want me to answer who can replace Taiwan's role? Why don't you name some Taiwan companies that the mainland can't survive without? Take home appliance companies for example and China's Haier is the dominates the top home appliance company in the world. _Top 5 Companies in the Smart Home Appliances Industry By Technavio_ 1. Haier (Chinese) 2. Electrolux (Swedish) 3. LG Electronics (South Korean) 4. Whirlpool (American) 5. Samsung (South Korean) Source: _Top 5 Companies in the Smart Home Appliances Industry By Technavio_ blog.technavio.com/blog/top-5-companies-smart-home-appliances The Top 5 Major Home Appliance Brands in the World 1. Haier (Chinese) 2. Whirlpool (American) 3. Electrolux (Swedish) 4. Gree Electric (China) 5. Bosch (German) Source: The Top 5 Major Home Appliance Brands in the World top5ofanything.com/list/02df276c/Major-Home-Appliance-Brands-in-the-World But where are the famous companies from Taiwan as opposed to the mainland?
    1
  25735. @Blue Pearl The OP specifically said "I wish they would do something like this in the U.S" therefore, isn't a Chinatown "something like this" as the OP claimed?
    1
  25736.  @paul-hh9oc  From what I understand, Walmart is extremely popular among Americans because of its low everyday prices, because most its products are Made in China. And the Chinese in your country, may not necessarily be from mainland China, so why do you trust what Chinese in your country are saying?
    1
  25737. @TheOriginalRin I've seen how this @paul 3221 just twist your words or put words in your mouth to suit his viewpoint only. While China does indeed have low quality products, it is indeed the global demand for such products, that have spurred some Chinese to make them.
    1
  25738. When Hong Kong was under British colonial rule from 1841-1997, the 1956 HK riots resulted in 59 deaths while the 1967 HK riots resulted in 51 deaths. Yet after Hong Kong handover to mainland China, there have been zero deaths thus far in this 2019 Hong Kong riot.
    1
  25739. Confucius said: “君子喻于义，小人喻于利。_(The noble man understands what is moral, while the petty man understands what is profitable.)"_ Sam Altman only wanted to profit from his technology, while the developers of Deep Seek opt to make the code open source and available to all.
    1
  25740. China is a meritocracy where politicians who fulfill their promises get elected into power. The U.S is a democracy where politicians who make the most attractive promises get elected into power.
    1
  25741. China is a meritocracy where politicians who fulfill their promises get elected into power. The U.S is a democracy where politicians who make promises get elected into power.
    1
  25742.  @mike40hawaii  Do you teach Chinese? It turns out that Chinese is the 2nd most common language in the Internet after English.
    1
  25743. Canada and Mexico had thought themselves safe and were taken by surprise by Trump's tariffs. Meanwhile, China has been preparing for additional tariffs since the trade war started during Trump's first term.
    1
  25744.  @dmitc01  Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous relationship with a much older man has been exposed and she has expressed a desire for personal privacy, but the WTA is demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see.
    1
  25745. Black Mirror is a work of fiction, and the directors purposely exaggerate each scenario to assume the worst possible consequences, for entertainment purposes. It doesn't necessarily mean reality will follow in its example.
    1
  25746. Didn't a U.S general confessed that he made a phone call to his Chinese counterpart, reassuring China that Trump will not launch a nuclear attack against China? Back when Trump was about to step down as POTUS? Surely there are precautions in place.
    1
  25747. Source: Chinese billionaire Jack Ma says he will donate 1,000,000 face masks and 500,000 coronavirus testing kits to the US cnn.com/2020/03/14/tech/jack-ma-face-masks-us-donation/index.html Chinese billionaire and Alibaba co-founder Jack Ma said he will donate 500,000 coronavirus testing kits and one million face masks to the United States.
    1
  25748.  @bigzv6948  I appreciate the sentiment, but China is producing surplus masks so why not export them? Video: China: Factory produces 5 million masks a day in bid to supply shortfall youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw?t=17
    1
  25749.  @s._3560  Source: Singapore to Close Schools, Most Workplaces With Rising Virus Cases bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-03/singapore-pm-says-more-steps-coming-on-virus-lee-speaks-at-4pm Singapore will impose stricter measures, that will include closing most workplaces and move to full home-based learning in schools, amid rising cases of local coronavirus infections.
    1
  25750.  @ashunknown9728  Singapore's health ministry on Sunday (April 5) confirmed 120 more Covid-19 (coronavirus) cases, the most new infections reported in a single day for the city-state. Source: Singapore reports 120 new coronavirus cases in record daily jump thestar.com.my/news/regional/2020/04/05/singapore-reports-120-new-coronavirus-cases-in-record-daily-jump
    1
  25751. +Parm Mohan About the Opuim wars, during the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want what the West has to offer, so the British waged two bloody wars with China, (the 1st war involved Indian troops) and force Chinese people to buy opium from them, which we didn't want, because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Chinese port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to pump the addiction throughout rest of China, and Hong Kong was stolen from China and made into a British colony. What did China do to deserve this treatment by Britain? Because Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, porcelain (precious china) were in high demand by the West, means they can invade China and force Chinese to buy their opium?
    1
  25752. +Parm Mohan said "China has land disputes with all the countries that surround it." China has settled boundary dispute approximately of 20,000 km with 12 countries out of the 22,000 km and is yet to settle about 2,000 km of boundary involving India and Bhutan. -In 1961, Nepal and China signed border agreement. -In 1962, Mongolia and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Afghanistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1963, Pakistan and China signed border agreement. -In 1991, USSR and China signed Sino-Soviet border agreement. -In 1992, Laos and China signed border agreement. -In 1994, Kazakhstan and China signed border agreement. -In 2011, Tajikistan ratified a 1999 deal with China. So how is China having land disputes with all the countries that surround us? Where is proof for your accusations?
    1
  25753. +Parm Mohan China has settled land disputes with virtual all our land neighbors, except India which is more troublesome. Did you know China has had over 19 talks with India but still fail to settle our countries borders? Back in 2017, China has been willing to make concessions in Aksai Chin if India cedes part of Tawang in Arunachal Pradesh. A former Chinese diplomat has hinted that settlement of the India-China boundary dispute is possible if India agrees to make concessions in the eastern sector. China ready to make concessions in Aksai Chin if India cedes part of Tawang in Arunachal Pradesh. Source: http://zeenews.india.com/india/china-ready-to-make-concessions-in-aksai-chin-if-india-cedes-part-of-tawang-in-arunachal-pradesh_1982943.html This shows that China is willing to make reasonable compromises if necessary, in order to settle our border land disputes with other countries. But India thus far has rejected this offer and not offered a counter proposal of its own. The Qing government had restricted opium sales in China to a minimum so that we can control the level of addiction in China. But Britain forced China at gunpoint to remove this restriction, and thus, our markets flooded with unwanted levels of this addictive drug, which made people ill, unable to work, and spent their life savings on this horrible addiction. Why? Britain chose to go to War with China (twice) so that they can continue to push drugs onto China and weaken our people. People were killed so that Britain can push drugs in China? And Hong Kong was leashed to Britain AT GUNPOINT, so how is what Britain did forgivable? Hong Kong had no reason to be leashed to Britain in the first place! And Hong Kong was an entire port city becoming a British colony, whereas in Sri Lanka, they leased a single port (in Hambantota) and not the entire city. Cigarette smoking is not the same as opium smoking so why are you trying to compare them? At least with cigarettes, Chinese people are still able to work and contribute back to society, but with opium, Chinese people would laze around, half-dead, and delirious and that greatly weakened our nation. Have you seen what the British did to Indians? The British brutally colonized India and Indian rebels were tied to the front of cannons and executed by blasting a whole in their chests (Blowing from a gun). The British made use of Indian supplies, ammunition, and soldiers to fight in their wars (7,000 Indian troops fought the Chinese during 1st Opium War) and Indian troops were also conscripted to fight the Nazi Germany (which in truth, had little to do with India as a country) Winston Churchill was racist towards Indians, and he caused an artificial famine in Bengal, in which estimated 3 million Indians starved to death, while the British stockpiled food for British troops. Wikipedia: Blowing from a gun Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Blowing_from_a_gun Prior to the British arrival in mid-19th century, India was prosperous and its global GDP was about 23%. But after the British left India in 1947, its GDP fell to below 4%. Where did all of India's wealth gone? Dr. Tharoor's speech reminded Britain of what they had done to India Video: youtu.be/2bkQmgNru5I?t=69
    1
  25754. +Parm Mohan In the term Aksai Chin, aksai literally means "white brook" whereas chin is denoting China isn't it? And if India reject our offer, then why doesn't India offer a counter proposal of its own, since it reject our offer? How does India plan to solve the territorial dispute at our border? How was India caught off guard in the 1967 clashes? On 16 September 1965, China issued an ultimatum to India to vacate the Nathu La pass. And on 13 August 1967, Chinese troops started digging trenches in Nathu La on the Sikkimese side which was observed by Indian troops. And as far as I know, the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence 和平共处五项原则 were put forth by Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, to help solve territorial disputes. But does India have any diplomacy of its own, other than sending troops to other countries? Like when India send troops to Donglong and obstruct PLA road construction in our own territory? It can be seen that India is the troublesome one and refuse to sign border agreement with China, and reject Chinese proposal for an exchange of territory, and not offering counterproposal of its own. China signed border agreements with virtually all our land neighbors (and I labeled the dates as well) so who is the one refusing to agree to sign border agreement? China and India has had 19 talks over our border, but still fail to arrive at an agreement. That's right, Opium addiction is much worse, so that's why the British waged war with China and forced us to stop our Opium restriction at gunpoint. Why British allowed to do this to China? And did you see what British did to India. So who is the true enemy here? This is the first time I am citing Dr Tharoor in this comment thread, so what are you talking about refusing to accept his other citation? When did I ever mention Dr Tharoor prior to citing his video in this comment thread?
    1
  25755. +Parm Mohan Those Indians always seem to blame other countries but not themselves. Aksai Chin is part of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, and the name Aksai Chin itself already gives away its origins. Pakistan is its own sovereign country (as recognized by India) so what makes Kashmir not part of Pakistan? The population in Kashmir is mostly Muslims and India agreed to allow Pakistan to form its own country following Islam isn't it? The 1967 India and China clash was not a war, it was a clash according to the following source. Indian Army doubled its size so what makes you think India was caught by surprise? Indian troops had started building up defensive fortifications of its own so what makes you think India wasn't prepared for war? 1967 India China Conflicts wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathu_La_and_Cho_La_clashes And in the end, China still controls Aksai Chin, so what sort of "victory" do those Indians proclaim? Killing more troops but losing land doesn't really translate to "victory" See? Those Indians refused to negotiate, and just claim Aksai Chin is theirs, Jammu & Kashmir is theirs, etc. Everything is not India's fault, its all the other countries fault. That's why China and India haven't signed border agreement deal, even aft 19 talks, whereas China signed land border agreements with virtually all our neighbors. Who is the troublesome one here? Doklam/Donglong was not even Indian territory, so why India send troops to disrupt PLA road construction? China has shown proof that Donglong belong to China according to the Convention of Calcutta Under Article 1, the boundary of Sikkim and Tibet was defined as the crest of the mountain range separating the waters flowing into the Teesta River in Sikkim and its tributaries from the waters flowing into the Tibetan Mochu River and northwards into other rivers of Tibet. The line commenced at Mount Gipmochi on the Bhutan frontier, and followed the above watershed to the point where it met Nepali territory. So China has proof that Donglong belongs to China. But where does Bhutan have proof of its own to show that Donglong belongs to them? Bhutan has literally zero evidence whatsoever that Doklam is part of its territory. Where did you cited Tharoor in this comment thread at all? As far as I know, Dr Tharoor was first cited by me in this comment thread, not by you.
    1
  25756. +Parm Mohan But Bhutan does not have any historical evidence of its own to show that Donglong/Doklam belongs to them. Being peaceful and having no military, doesn't automatically grant you historical claim over Donglong. Bhutan failed to provide evidence, yet India just blindly take their side without proof? At least China has shown with the Convention of Calcutta that Donglong belongs to China. _Under Article 1, the boundary of Sikkim and Tibet was defined as the crest of the mountain range separating the waters flowing into the Teesta River in Sikkim and its tributaries from the waters flowing into the Tibetan Mochu River and northwards into other rivers of Tibet. The line commenced at Mount Gipmochi on the Bhutan frontier, and followed the above watershed to the point where it met Nepali territory. _ Convention of Calcutta Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_of_Calcutta As far as I know, Donglong is still under Chinese control and People's Liberation Army troops patrol that area. According to below source, the Chinese PLA has around 700 troopers in the Doklam area. China moves its troops in Doklam Source: msn.com/en-in/news/newsindia/china-moves-its-troops-in-doklam-army-not-worried/ar-BBLbUqq As far as I know, you shown Indians to be blaming the Pakistanis, blaming the Chinese, and virtually everyone who's not an Indian ally. Who wants to work with an India that constantly blames other countries? China solved border issues with virtually all our land neighbors and signed border treaties, yet China had 19 talks with India over our border, and yet fail to arrive at a conclusion? China offered a compromise, parts of Arunchal Pradesh for Tawang, but India rejected this offer and did not offer counter proposal of its own. Even Doklam/Donglong had nothing to do with India, and Bhutan produced ZERO evidence that Donglong is there's, yet India just send its troops into other countries territories? Apparently it's not China that is the problem here, it is India. India only sees things from its selfish point of view, and disregard actual evidence shown by China, by Pakistan, and anything else it refuses to see. I mean look at India and China: -India is world's largest democracy, whereas China is 'communist' -India is 2nd most populous country, so it has a workforce comparable to China -Indians speak English (attractive to Westerners) whereas most Chinese still struggle with English today. -India has a free market, whereas China's market is still strictly controlled even till today. -Republic of India was founded in 1947, whereas People's Republic of China was founded 2 years later. -India is located in between China and the West. -India is founding member of WTO in 1995, whereas China joined the WTO late in 2001 India had all the above advantages, whereas China held all the disadvantages. And yet, China toady ahs overtaken India in virtually every field. -China is world's 2nd largest economy, India is the 7th -Literacy rate of China is 96%, literacy rate in India is 71% -China's Global Hunger Index is 7.5(low) compared to India's 31.4(serious) -India has 5 times more people living modern slavery than China. -India has a higher corruption index than China. -China has world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army. -China is world's 5th largest weapons exporter. India is world's largest weapons importer. -China is ranked 17th in Global Innovation Index whereas India is ranked 57th. So why do those Indians continue to blame China? China was once dirt-poor, starving, 3rd world country like India in the past, but look at China today.
    1
  25757. +Tan Meng It's the weekend today, so what's wrong?
    1
  25758. +Tan Meng just answering.
    1
  25759. +Parm Mohan China doesn't take resources without payment and China pays legally for resources from other countries, like in African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Angola, etc. China has built infrastructure in Africa like roads railways, highways, bridges, schools, hospitals, hotels, shopping centres, powerstations and telecommunication projects, since the 1970s. China has done much to develop Africa in decades compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. As for possible war, China today is at peace and not at war with any country (since our last major war in 1979). Whereas USA is involved in Gulf war, Iraq war, Afghan war, Libyan war, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing those countries and cutting off those countries heads (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and installing its own US government puppets in place. Now USA is eyeing Syria and the Assad regime is next on the list. It seems that America is primarily the main reason behind wars in the 21st century, from what I described above.
    1
  25760. +jack chung The West was built on the backs of African slavery, genocide of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals, occupation of their lands (even till today), plundering or resources like gold, and colonization of Africa and Asia (India, Hong Kong, Singapore, etc). Their resources are not their own, they stole it from Asia, Africa, and the native Australians and native Americans. Their sciences, mathematics, astronomy actually had their origins in Asia, and their technologies like crossbows and gunpowder actually came from China. That's why Westerners are so rich today, because they're sitting on a pile of wealth obtained from Asia, Africa, America and Australia. If people like Leo Taxil want you to leave America, then he should also tell all those non-Native Americans to get out of America and leave it for the Native Americans.
    1
  25761. +Parm Mohan Ancient Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions 四大发明 that have gone onto influence the world. Paper and Printing have made the recording and transmission of knowledge much easier and faster. The Compass made navigation much easier, and dangerous voyages became safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has greatly influenced the way modern wars are fought. So many people all over the world benefited from these 4 inventions, and arguably, the West would not be where it is today if not for them. For example, would the West be able to colonize Africa, Asia, America and Australia, if not for gunpowder providing the colonials a superior advantage over the natives? The Rocket that now sends people to space, that was first invented in China during Song dynasty. Chinese ships had ventured out into the oceans long before the West even colonized America, and our ancient ships boasted inventions like the Junk rig, compartmentalized bulkheads, and the world's 1st true rudder. Of course, the invention of the compass was essential for reliable navigation. During Ming dynasty in 1405-1403, Admiral Zheng He made seven voyages throughout the Indian Ocean, visiting India, Africa and the Middle East, leading an armada of over 300 ships! Some ships were so massive that they had 9 masts and were around 3-5 times the size of Columbus' Santa Maria flagship! But it was a merchant armada, meant for peaceful trading, and not conquest of other lands. Chinese traded luxury goods like precious silk, tea, paper, porcelain (precious china) in exchange for exotic animals on their voyages. Zheng He Voyages (By Crashcourse History) Video: youtube.com/watch?v=NjEGncridoQ&t=126 So why do you accuse China of not doing much? China does not maintain peace on the other side of the world? The USA also doesn't do that, because it invaded Vietnam, Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, etc, etc. At least China is investing in projects in other countries instead of invading them with guns and bombs like the USA. China does not help small countries maintain their identity next to large countries that threaten them? Well, China is certainly helping Pakistan maintain its identity next to large countries like India, that threaten Pakistan. China is helping DPRK maintain its identity next to large countries like USA, which constantly impose sanctions on N. Korea. You said so yourself. It just seems like you just criticize China through an extremely biased point of view and don't organize your points into a logical manner. You just jump from criticism to criticism without links, and point out only what you want to criticize about China that's all. China runs a business, not a charity. If you constantly give money to poorer countries, then over time they'll become dependent on your revenue to survive. Why do you want this? Look at what China is doing in African countries (like Nigeria, Kenya, Angola, etc). China is building infrastructure in Africa, such as roads, railways, highways, bridges, schools, hospitals, hotels, shopping centers, football stadiums, power stations and telecommunication projects, since the 1970s. China has done much to help develop Africa in just decades, as compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongolian Kublai Khan conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China and incorporated them as part of Yuan Dynasty China. The Manchu people did the same thing centuries later. For comparison, Europe only began colonizing America about 600 years ago. That means Tibet was part of China for longer than the entire American colonization history. If you want China to give Tibet back, then why not ask non-Native Americans get out of America and leave them to the original natives? Afterall, when the Westerners first colonized America, Tibet was already part of China.
    1
  25762. +Parm Mohan The Mongolians conquered Kingdom of Thibet and Song Dynasty China, but what did they even contribute to the empire? Who grows the food necessary to feed the empire? The Mongolians were nomadic tribesmen, living off the land, and moving to fresher pastures, so its the Han farmers that grow food to feed the empire. Who plans the villages, the towns and cities in the empire? The Mongolians lived in temporary houses, called yurts, instead of permanent houses, so its the Han builders who built the towns and cities. Who governs the day to day affairs of the the empire? Mongolians know nothing about governing a country as large as China, so Han bureaucrats ensured that the empire is running smoothly All the Mongolians knew was how to fight, to steal crops and loot villages, to kill men and rape women, to destroy precious works of art, and to burn whatever they can't take with them on their journeys. That's why even Kublai Khan choose to abandon his own barbaric culture, and adopt Chinese ways and proclaim himself Emperor of Yuan dynasty China. That's why it was called Yuan 元 dynasty, not Mongolian empire, under Kublai Khan. The Mongolian leaders eventually assimilated into Chinese culture and tradition over time.
    1
  25763.  @richardpluim4426  Chinese are perhaps among the most intelligent and diligent peoples of the world, willing to work hard in blue collar jobs such as laborers (coolies), rickshaw riders, farmers, grocers, laundromat workers, chefs (of Chinese restaurants) massage parlor, nail salons, etc. Parents save money and send kids to school, encouraging good grades and their kids graduate to take on white collar jobs like doctors, lawyers, engineers, scientists, computer experts, bankers, researchers. There is literally no job too low or too high for Chinese.
    1
  25764. GTA series is about an America in decline. Car-theft, gun-violence, drug-trafficking and other criminal behavior is treated as normal, even encouraged.
    1
  25765. The government is reviving the ancient Chinese imperial doctrine, the "Mandate of Heaven", where a competent leader is allowed to remain in power to maximise benefits to China, while an incompetent leader will eventually be overthrown by rebellion, all as part of Heaven's decree.
    1
  25766. China's digital Renminbi doesn't require access to the Internet to use, so foreigners in China don't even need to set up a Chinese bank account nor have Internet access, to be able to use digital RMB.
    1
  25767. Of all the above, USA is only interested in providing "security". Primarily that of the U.S's interests.
    1
  25768. Peng Shuai is clearly safe and she has appeared on IOC video call expressing her desire for her personal privacy to be respected. But the WTA is behaving like the paparazzi and demanding that she appear in public to bare her private affairs for all the world to see.
    1
  25769. It was a Chinese fire drill, if you know what I mean.
    1
  25770. Crystal Ball China has 5000 years of history, and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilizations still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations, like Rome and Egypt, have faded to history. At one stage, China was conquered by Mongolians and later the Manchu people, but the rulers had assimilated into Chinese culture. Why are you hurling insults at me personally, for simply pointing out what Chinese history has shown here?
    1
  25771. Haowei Li It is Chinese civilization that survived 5000 years of history, not the individual dynasties. China was even conquered by Mongolians and later, the Manchu people, but still Han Chinese accepted them as leaders, because of "Mandate of Heaven" doctrine. This whole system guided China successfully, because it is believed that a competent leader is allowed to remain in power, while an incompetent leader is toppled by rebellions. And that's what the government is trying to revive here that's all.
    1
  25772.  @redfieldchris1217  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  25773.  Lynn Michael  "神州 Shenzhou China sponsors terrorism..." China doesn't even have an entry in Wikipedia: State-sponsored terrorism yet you're accusing China of sponsoring terrorism? Source: State-sponsored terrorism wikipedia.org/wiki/State-sponsored_terrorism#By_country
    1
  25774. @Chloé Gaquerre About China's alleged debt trap diplomacy, Chinese President Xi Jinping has pledged to waive debts for the least developed African countries that have both high debt burdens and diplomatic ties with China. Speaking at the opening of a summit with African leaders in Beijing, Xi said his country would offer an extra $US60 billion ($83 billion) in financing to African countries. Source: China waives debt, promises 'no imposition of will' on African nations smh.com.au/world/asia/china-waives-debt-promises-no-imposition-of-will-on-african-nations-20180904-p501nr.html "In addition, for Africa's least developed countries, heavily indebted and poor countries, landlocked developing countries and small island developing countries that have diplomatic relations with China, the debt they have incurred in the form of interest-free Chinese government loans due to mature by the end of 2018 will be exempted," Xi said.
    1
  25775.  Lynn Michael  Wikipedia is blocked in China, what makes you think it's another globalist stooge steered by CCP? Where's your evidence of China's alleged state-sponsored terrorism, if you don't trust my source?
    1
  25776.  Lynn Michael  Here's a look inside Chinese BYD mask factory producing 5,000,000 masks a day. Video: China: Factory produces 5 million masks a day in bid to supply shortfall youtu.be/IgUelMIuTdw?t=16
    1
  25777.  @slantedyee5621  This factory in the eastern Chinese city of Rizhao (日照) has been busy pumping out 3,000,000 masks a day. Video: Inside China's Biggest Mask Factory youtu.be/Gc074FxOBA4?t=11
    1
  25778.  @medezez3562  What about those Uighurs that aren't so good? Why can't China reform those Uighurs who have been misled by radical Islam?
    1
  25779.  @VisionExplo   China does not lock those Uighurs up, they take the weekends off and can to leave the schools to return to their families. Buses are charted to take Uighur's back to their home villages, since Xinjiang is very vast region and many of them hail from remote villages. It's like your Singapore
    1
  25780.  @medezez3562  The innocent Uighurs aren't in those schools, only those Uighurs who have extremist tendencies and being reformed that's all.
    1
  25781.  @medezez3562  Later reports by BBC revealed that the Uighurs have the weekend off and are allowed to leave the schools to be with their families. Why do you call it a lie then?
    1
  25782.  @medezez3562  Uighurs had their own vibrant Uighur culture before the Islamic invaders conquered the region and converted the them to Islam. In the uploaders video, those Muslims wearing Muslim headveil are not the true Uighur culture, its because Islam forcefully converted them to Islam in the past. So why can't China sinicize the Uighurs of Xinjiang (whom are Chinese citizens by birth)?
    1
  25783.  @medezez3562  There are international journalists coming to Xinjiang and express positive support for the government's program. Video: International journalists visit NW China's Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region youtube.com/watch?v=po0MUkxILpQ "What I could see with my own very eyes is that this way is the right way. We have seen these institutes for education, a place where people learn, not only the place they are living in, they also learn a job, they also learn how to cope in a modern environment, on their own will." - Corriere Della Sera Italian daily newspaper.
    1
  25784.  @medezez3562  In this Irish source, an Uighur named Pazalaibutuyi (26) told reporters at the Hotan centre that five years ago she had attended an illegal religious gathering at a neighbour’s house, where they were taught that women should cover their faces. Source: irishtimes.com/news/world/asia-pacific/china-defends-xinjiang-camps-as-it-takes-reporters-on-tour-1.3750070 “At that time I was infected with extremist thought so I wore a face veil,” Pazalaibutuyi said after a year at the centre. Government officials came to her village to talk to the villagers and after that, she said, “I discovered my mistake.” I mean, why teach Uighur women to cover their faces? Because Islam compels them to? Look at the uploader's video and all those Uighurs wearing Muslims headveil, and that's not the real Uighur culture, that is Islam.
    1
  25785. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  25786. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  25787. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  25788. @Karan dhabalia Who said that YouTube is banned in China? Nobody will come arrest you for logging on to YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested for doing so?
    1
  25789. @Karan dhabalia Why can't you name me which person has been arrested for accessing YouTube while in China? There are so many foreign companies that come to China and set up shop here and many of them require access to Western websites like YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, etc to operate, so the government issue VPN licence to these companies. So which person has been arrested just for logging on to YouTube while in China?
    1
  25790.  @fadzilhashim.0910  Indian soldiers were sent by the British government to fight the Japanese in Malaysia, because Malaysia was British colony. And Malaysian love Chinese products like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, etc, but where are the famous companies from India?
    1
  25791. Walmart will no longer have as cheap as before products that Americans enjoyed before.
    1
  25792.  @fatdoi003  Apart from Singapore, no other South East Asian country sanctioned Russia. It looks like you're supporting my argument that Singapore's stance is not neutral since they sanctioned Russia. Your words even make it out to be that Singapore is effectively a puppet of the U.S.
    1
  25793.  @fatdoi003  Apart from Singapore, no other South East Asian country sanctioned Russia. By slapping sanctions on Russia, Singapore is demonstrating that they are not neutral and that they are doing the bidding of the United States.
    1
  25794.  @fatdoi003  No other ASEAN/South East Asian country has sanctioned Russia (apart from Singapore) and have any of them been removed from SWIFT payment system?
    1
  25795. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  25796. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  25797. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  25798. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  25799. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  25800. How does Taiwan island relate to Philippines interests? Granting the US military access to several military facilities in the Philippines doesn't put a brake to delay the headlong path of US and mainland China into a war over Taiwan, instead it accelerates it.
    1
  25801. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiment in the West against Russia and China. And it's having the effect of pushing both our countries closer together than we've ever been.
    1
  25802. China is ally to both Ukraine and Russia, that's why China is sending humanitarian aid to Ukraine, while continuing to do business with Russia. It's the West that's supporting war by sending lethal aid to Ukraine.
    1
  25803. The latest news is that many European countries have accepted Putin's deal to purchase Russian gas in rubles. Yet, they protest when China continues to do business with Russia?
    1
  25804.  @Carbuncle0168  Why did U.S steal lands from Native Americans?
    1
  25805. This is Kim's first visit outside the country as DPRK's leader.
    1
  25806.  @Purplepiperpicklepeople  How much of that 4% were originally people from other countries? Albert Einstein (Germany)? Even Elon Musk (South Africa)?
    1
  25807. @Purplepiperpicklepeople Success built upon backs of slavery and displacing the Native Americans. Influence and power based on keeping other countries (including it's allies) down. Wealth like gold and oil that actually belongs to the Native Americans.
    1
  25808.  @Purplepiperpicklepeople  Their success is not their own, it was built upon the backs of slavery and displacing the Native Americans. Their wealth is not their own, their resources like gold and oil actually belongs to the Native Americans.
    1
  25809. +Rio Young Hong Kong's leaders are still elected by Hong Kong people, The HK Chief Executive Officer is selected by a 1,200-member Election Committee, which consists of various HK corporations, and all Beijing does is approve the candidates that's all. In the end Beijing doesn't get to choose which candidate gets voted into power, the voting is entirely done by HK.
    1
  25810. +Rio Young Can you elaborate how did China influence the election? All Beijing did was approve which candidates that's all, and in the end, the HK Election Committee did the voting. HK's current Chief Executive is Carrie Lam 林鄭月娥 who won with 777 votes, all cast by HK.
    1
  25811. +Rio Young That was part of the agreement China made with Britain, back when they handed over Hong Kong back to China. According to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 香港基本法第四十五條 The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government
    1
  25812. +Sam Shyam Did you see the results of the latest Taiwan midterm elections? The pro-independence DPP suffered major defeat and lost two of its major posts to the KMT. Even pro-independence Taiwan President Tsai resigned following such a humiliating defeat. Doesn't it goes to show that the people of Taiwan don't want independence after all?
    1
  25813.  @PUTLERLOVESTRUMPSKY  China has done much to develop African countries in just decades, compared to what Western countries have been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  25814. +wclifton968 If Chinese people can survive harsher environments, cheaper living conditions, lesser calorie intake per day, than Westerners, then why should poverty in China be defined according the USA's standards?
    1
  25815. +wclifton968 Firstly, the cost of living in China is cheaper than living in the West. Secondly, Chinese people natural constitution means we have lower calorie intake than white Caucasians, (who tend to eat above the recommended intake too, leading to obesity like in USA) There are separate methods to calculate when a Caucasian is overweight, as to when an Asian is overweight, so why can't there be different methods for calculating poverty in our countries too? You think everything must follow Western standards? Also, you think the West doesn't have biased propaganda against China too? Western media been predicting China's economic downfall from since back in 1990s. Here is a compiled list of what Western journalists have to say about China's economy. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. Clearly, Western propaganda is extremely biased against China's economy and has been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years. China has consistently avoided "hard landings" and was even world's largest economy in 2014. So why do you continue believing in stories about a Chinese hard landing? It's been almost 30 years since Westerners first "prediction"...
    1
  25816. According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%.
    1
  25817.  @wisdomleader85  If we want to bring out the race card in this discussion, then there are many Westerners in China who start companies in China and their hard work has paid off and they become successful through putting in effort into their works. serpentza is NOT one of such persons, and some Westerners are even against him being in China. Video: SerpentZA Exposed as a Fraud! youtube.com/watch?v=GRqcA04FtmM serpentza's Mandarin proficiency sucks, even despite being in China for so long, you can't hold a decent conversation with him in Mandarin about various everyday topics that interest Chinese. It's because his vocabulary is merely that of a 7-year old, despite living in China for more than a decade already. Look, he doesn't even bother to put up Chinese subtitles in his English videos (which would potentially avoid any misunderstanding in his videos by Chinese)
    1
  25818.  @wisdomleader85  I often quote sources to support my arguments and you are always welcome to come refute my points as you see fit.
    1
  25819.  @wisdomleader85  You seem to have plenty of time yourself to reply to me. And who says there has to be time limit to discussions? Take all the time in the world to prepare your points as necessary. I mean, I don't resort to ad hominem attacks like you are constantly doing to me, just because my views differ from yours. And what has the CCP propaganda machine even got to do with serpentza's behavior here? This is the video where serpentza was dishonest, when he initially claimed "Your English is very good" to a Chinese in Taiwan. But just over a minute later in the video, serpentza remarked that that person speaks bad English. Video: youtube.com/watch?v=T4Wyrt_TuXU&t=620 So how is this propaganda, when serpentza himself exhibits such dishonest behavior? And were any of my previous sources here in this thread from the CCP, for you to label my sources as lies?
    1
  25820.  @wisdomleader85  said "Deceiving people with false information and sensationalism is your job, after all." Again with the ad hominem attacks? You can't seem to accept the fact that others have expressed similarly negative views about serpentza, so you just label everyone whose views oppose yours and deceived or fooled by me? Whataboutism is the technique or practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counteraccusation or raising a different issue, so isn't it apparent that you first brought up the video like I explained earlier?
    1
  25821.  @wisdomleader85   Look, when did I ever said anything about CCP here in this thread until you yourself brought it up? The discussion was mostly talking about serpentza here, then you suddenly brought up CCP and implied that I am part of the pro-government propaganda (without proof too)? You talked about Whataboutism and this appears to be another attempt of your Whataboutism to hijack this thread to talk about CCP. Besides, aren't you the one seemingly denigrating every comment that doesn't agree with you by resorting to ad hominem attacks here? I am not the first person (nor the last) to judge serpentza based on his videos. The previous video link I posted was also about Western guy exposing serpentza as a fraud based on his videos. I mean, why doesn't serpentza ever seem to invite local Chinese people on camera to talk about China? Where are his Chinese friends, given that he's been in China for at least a decade already?
    1
  25822.  @Readytogo11111  For example?
    1
  25823. NATO was formed initially in response to Soviet Union military might. But after the USSR was dissolved in 1990, NATO no longer serves any interests. Except that of the US's.
    1
  25824. ​ @sjent "Your exact quote was: "Solar power plants often have the disadvantage of not being able to generate power at night." Yes that's my exact quote. However, as I said, I never said it was a solar power plant alone, "Now you are trying to play on technicalities." You're the one who made it all about technicalities when you differentiated between solar power plant and hybrid power plant. "And the other half of the year it wont generate any power. So your argument still does not work." Never said it was all year round. Could you quote me my argument where I said it has to be all year round? Your argument was that it is physically impossible for solar plants to generate power at night, and I have proven it wrong with solar plants located in regions where there is sunlight even at midnight. "I misspoke, but context was accurate. "Aside of US, there is like 5 backwater countries that use this completely outdated scale." How is the context accurate? "AND" means that the two are related, but the US is certainly not one of those 5 backwater countries. And why don't you answer my question in the earlier part "Why can't I use Fahrenheit?" Cyrus Janssen is an American YouTuber so I don't see anything wrong with using the units that Americans are familiar with here on his channel.
    1
  25825. ​ @sjent "Dont even try this bs. You neither specified nor implied anything else." So if I neither specified nor implied anything else, then why are you assuming I am referring to solar power plants alone? "Now you just try to inject new argument, that was never there." You're the one that's injecting a new argument about solar plants producing power all year round, when it was never there in the first place. You've even transformed it into my argument (you said: "So your argument still does not work.") when it was never my argument in the first place. "That is not technicality, but attempt to change argument into something it was not." That's exactly what you're doing. You said it was physically impossible for solar plants to produce power at night, yet I've shown that solar plants can produce power in regions where there is sunlight even at midnight. Then suddenly you changed the argument into about solar plants producing power all year round. "You dont have to. Entire argument was referring to period of time, so it a critical factor by default. If solar panels cannot generate power 24/7, then if they cannot do it 365 days a year, is certainly as relevant." A period of time as in throughout the night. Now you're moving the goalpost to make it 365 days a year, so aren't you the one introducing a new argument when it wasn't there before? "When it comes to this trait, it is. And that was the point." Look, you claimed you misspoke the word "AND." What _"AND" means that the two are related, but you said "ASIDE" which means out of the way. So the two words have different meanings altogether so how is that the point? You're using entirely different words and claiming the context was accurate. "Being born in US does not make him American YouTuber. As i understand he has been living outside of US for quite awhile." Him living outside doesn't change the fact that Cyrus Janssen is an American YouTuber. He literally has American citizenship how is he not an American YouTuber? "His channel is international and most of the world does not use Fahrenheit. In addition to that he is not talking about US. So it is far more appropriate to use Celsius, rather than Fahrenheit." How is he not talking about the US? At 5:44 of the video, he mentioned the US minerals deal with Ukraine and about the US annexing Greenland. Look, Cyrus even uses the American unit OUNCE when talking about gold, so how is he not an American YouTuber? And yet you're claiming his channel is international and that it is far more appropriate to use Celsius, rather than Fahrenheit? It appears you don't even know Cyrus' channel all that well.
    1
  25826. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  25827. ​ @sjent "Because this is how language works. If you do not mention or imply something else, then it is not part of the conversation." This is the text you quoted from me: "Solar power plants often have the disadvantage of not being able to generate power at night." You even called attention to the word "often" by emboldening the word. "Often" means "in many instances," which means there are instances where solar power plants can generate power at night, one of which is pairing the solar power plant with energy storage such as batteries or molten salt. Therefore, I've never said it had to be a solar power plant alone. Otherwise, please tell me the reason why you specifically highlighted the word "often" in that text you quoted. "Core of original argument was about solar plants not producing power all the time. Shifting argument from 24 hour period to 365 day period does not solve this issue, in fact it just extends it, while retaining same core problem." No one said anything about solar plants producing power all the time, the original argument was about solar power plants producing power throughout the night. You're the one shifting the argument from 24 hours to 365 days when it wasn't part of the original argument in the first place. "You shift argument, without adjusting parameters to fit." Please show me where did I shifted the argument? Your argument was that is was physically impossible to generate power at night, and I responded that technically, it is possible if the plants are located where there is sunlight even at midnight. "You moved location, without adjusting for specifics of location." You never mentioned anything about location, you just said it was physically impossible for a solar plant to generate power at night, and I just shown that is is physically possible that's all. "And i did exactly that, adjusted argument based on new conditions." So you admit to adjusting the argument from 24 hours to 365 days? Furthermore, you claimed it was my argument (you said: "So your argument still does not work.") but when did it become my argument? "You concentrate on meaning of one word, not on context of entire sentence." Didn't you yourself concentrate on a single word yourself? You said: This is why i said "AND" so you are calling attention to one word (mind you a word that is entirely missing because you misspoke) then tell me which word are you referring to. Because the only word linking United States to those 5 backwater countries in your sentence is the word "ASIDE" which has a different meaning from "AND". "In addition to that term "aside" has multiple meanings, in this case "to or toward the side". As something adjacent." But those other meanings don't apply to the context of your sentence. You're not referring to 5 countries towards the side or adjacent to the US, you're saying "putting US out of the way" when you said: "Aside of the US, there is like 5 backwater countries..." "Fact? You havent established that he is an American Youtuber to begin with." Cyrus Janssen was born in the United States, it says so on his channel page. "I have no idea what country citizenship he has, but it does not even matter, as he is an expat." He was born in America. You claim he is an expat, but what sort of expat? American expat of course, because that's his country of origin. "Only he can say what kind of YouTuber he identifies himself as. So unless you have any evidence of that, your argument is completely false." Look at his channel page, his introduction video is titled: "American Speaks Fluent Chinese and Shares China Story" so he considers himself an American. It's so easy to look up this information, yet you already prepared a response in case my argument is "completely false?" "Troy ounce is an internationally accepted unit of weight measure for precious metals." Yes it is. The symbol for troy ounce is "t oz" or "oz t". "It is not the same as US ounce, even if both have same origin in Ancient Rome." Correct. The American symbol for ounce is "oz" and being an American himself, Cyrus used the American ounce when when talking about gold. At 6:10 of the video, Cyrus wrote: $3,000 / OZ instead of using the symbol for troy ounce. It's a common mistake by Americans since they are so used to their version of the ounce. Therefore, my statement that "Look, Cyrus even uses the American unit OUNCE when talking about gold, so how is he not an American YouTuber?" still stands. "Particularly funny statement, considering how you write "It appears you don't even know Cyrus' channel all that well." right after that." It's precisely because I know Cyrus' channel quite well, that I spotted this common mistake of his. On the other hand, you've seem to demonstrate that you don't know his channel that well. BTW, if you want more proof, look at his previous video before this, the one titled: "Americans CAN'T Believe What China is Building in the Arctic Now!" and in that video, he uses the American unit MILES when he says China is thousand of miles away from the Artic. Later in the video he also said then journey thousand of miles to the Indian Ocean. Therefore, I don't see anything wrong with using the units that Americans are familiar with here on his channel, such as Fahrenheit.
    1
  25828. Ashley Cottle Agreed. laowhy's making mountain out of molehill here.
    1
  25829.  @Allumious  Hong Kong thrived under authoritarian British colonial rule since 1841-1997 and only when democracy was introduced to Hong Kong, in the form of One Country, Two Systems Policy, did Hong Kong began suffering from protests.
    1
  25830.  @urbanistgod  Why do you allow ordinary people to participate in important decisions regarding the country's future? Ordinary people may not vote responsibly (they refuse to turn up to vote) or they base their decision on emotions (I don't like foreigners, so I vote for Britain to leave the EU) or they may simply lack the political awareness of their country's situation, or they are susceptible to fake news and foreign influences. That's how Trump was able to prey on gullible Americans votes with false promises of making America great again and come to power, even when he has zero political experience. Whereas in China, if you want to participate in politics, you must commit your life to politics and join the communist party (not easy, you must be top 5% of your industry) and slowly work your way to the top by garnering votes from other politically savvy members. It's not an easy process and its not perfect, but it has produced leaders like President Xi Jinping, who has 30-40 years of political experience. That's why Chinese people feel he is qualified to lead our country of 1.4 billion.
    1
  25831.  @urbanistgod  Look at history and how many countries had kings and emperors, over democracy?
    1
  25832.  @urbanistgod  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas "democratic" Republic of Rome eventually fell. Democracy wasn't popular outside of Greece, and China had seen the rise and fall of many empires and survived violent course of history. China has always been authoritarian (and we still are) so why can't China continue authoritarianism?
    1
  25833.  @perrodehont5109  I'm afraid you're mistaken. I wrote (I don't like foreigners, so I vote for Britain to leave the EU) was meant to represent British citizens voting on emotions not logic, and doesn't represent my personal view. My stance is that political power should be concentrated in the hands of the elites, not the masses and keep the masses away from politics, please!
    1
  25834.  @urbanistgod  I'm trying to prove, that human history is full of dictatorships, not democracy. History has shown many human societies gravitate towards dictatorships, and history is the best teacher is it not?
    1
  25835.  NOYDB  Who says YouTube is prohibited in China? Nobody will arrest you if you log on to YT while in China.
    1
  25836.  @urbanistgod  But like I said, ordinary people may not be political aware, they don't know the country's political situations unlike the elites, or they may make decisions base on emotions not logic. Why entrust your country's future in their hands?
    1
  25837.  @urbanistgod  "Government should stay away from people’s lives." Consider this question: Who is more qualified to lead the country? Government or People? If you choose people then why have a government then?
    1
  25838.  @urbanistgod  You have consistently failed to show why democracy is the best system. Your criteria are based on your emotions and your own personal opinion, not on logic, and ignoring historical evidence and whatnot.
    1
  25839.  @dhk1126  Those countries did not collapse, they transition into the next dynasty (which is also authoritarian) And South Korean Dictator Park Chung-hee, transformed S. Korea from dirt-poor country (with GDP lower than some Sub-Sahara countries) into an Asian power today, so what's wrong with dictatorship?
    1
  25840. ​ @dhk1126  Every great ancient civilization needed some sort of censorship. China was the very first secret police state, with the Jinyiwei 锦衣卫 "Embroidered Uniform Guard" of Ming Dynasty China in 14th century, serving the Ming Emperor. China also had the Imperial Censorate 御史台 which were "the eyes and ears" of the emperor and checked administrators at each level to prevent corruption and malfeasance. Even Roman Empire had their own Imperial Censors, and the Ottoman empire had the Janissaries so like I said every civilization needs some form of censorship in order to maintain public order, and history has shown this to be true. Then why can't China maintain some censorship when it has worked for China before?
    1
  25841.  NOYDB  According to your Websites blocked in mainland China those sites are merely blocked, but it doesn't mean that they are banned in China.
    1
  25842.  @srivthefour7468  Look at history and there are no surviving examples of democracies (Athens, Sparta, Greek, Rome, etc) that have been successful, so why do you think democracy (or republic) will be successful? I've stressed this point so many times, but you people just seem to ignore it is all.
    1
  25843.  @lcm0112  "神州 Shenzhou China doesn't have 5000 years of history." China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. Ancient Chinese nobility wore luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, while the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths and "bedsheets" called togas. Silk was much prized by rest of the world, so much that a lucrative trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material. Along the Silk Road, came precious Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, paper, gunpowder, porcelain (precious china) that were in great demand throughout ancient world.
    1
  25844.  @urbanistgod  Let's consider the following scenario: China has heavy pollution because of our over-reliance on coal power (which produce smog) so China is making the switch to green energy, by building world's largest hydroelectric powerstation, the Three Gorges Dam to supply China with renewable energy to fuel our growth. Video: The Largest Dam in The World youtube.com/watch?v=b8cCsUBYSkw But during its construction, there were many opposition from ecologists, environmentalists, archaeologists, villagers need relocation, but because the government can just bulldoze the opposition and push ahead with the project, the construction gets completed on time, and China gets to reap the benefits. Had China been a democracy, the whole project would be bogged down in protests, lobbyists, dissidents, and all manner of delays, and it might even get cancelled instead. So doesn't authoritarian work, because you can bulldoze the opposition and push ahead with projects?
    1
  25845.  @urbanistgod  What makes you think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese people are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone in the world has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Your Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers. Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, Oppo, etc, are expanding overseas, and Chinese investors are buying up property in your countries. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 So what makes you think Chinese people are oppressed? Chinese people can be found virtually anywhere in the globe today, since we make up 20% of world's population after all. Go to your neighborhood and see how many Chinese nationals you can spot. Or go to your local university and ask the local students how they feel about the "Chinese competition"
    1
  25846.  @urbanistgod  Besides world's largest dam, China also dominates solar power and the current largest photovoltaic power station in the world is the 850 MW Longyangxia Dam Solar Park, in Qinghai, China. China also built world's largest floating solar farm in Huainan City, Anhui province, East China. Video: World's largest floating solar farm in E China youtube.com/watch?v=qKpYH5SYUeo It shows that authoritarian governments have the power ignore the opposition and just push ahead with projects. You said in democracy things get done, but it is oftentimes a costly process, mired in protests, lobbyists, opposition, dissidents, and other troublemakers that just drag the country down and waste resources.
    1
  25847.  @urbanistgod  As far as I know, China is world's largest internet population by number of users and Chinese language is the 2nd most common Internet language just behind English. So there are so many websites in Chinese language that people in China can access, so again, how are Chinese oppressed on the Internet? Top Ten Languages Used in the Web https://internetworldstats.com/stats7.htm
    1
  25848.  @urbanistgod  Chinese can still use VPN to access those website while in China, so what's the problem? Besides hydro electric and solar power, China also dominates in wind power and Gansu Wind Farm in China is world's largest land wind farm and we are also investing in offshore wind farms. Video: China's offshore wind sector blows into high gear youtube.com/watch?v=M5j2Dr0kPhc I've already talked about censorship previously. Every major civilization needs censorship, the Romans had the Imperial Censors, the Ottomans had Jannissaries, and likewise, China was the first secret police state with the Jinyiwei 锦衣卫 "Embroidered Uniform Guard" of Ming Dynasty. And like I keep saying, virtually all the ancient countries adopted authoritarianism or oligarchy in their countries, so why can't China do the same, since we have always been under authoritarian rule (back then and now)?
    1
  25849.  @urbanistgod  Besides dominating in green energy, China sold the most Plug-in Electric Vehicle (PEVs) in 2018, at 2,243 units as compared to Europe's 1,346 units and United states with 1,126 units. Source: Top PEV global markets stock wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Top_PEV_global_markets_stock_2017_final_with_California.png China is also world's largest electric bus market, dominating 99% of the world's electric bus market. China is also the global leader in the electrification of other transport modes, with more than 200 million electric two-wheelers, and 3 to 4 million low-speed electric vehicles (LSEVs). This is because the government is authoritarian, so it can push for large scale implementation of green energy and electric vehicles, whereas in a well-established fossil fuel industry like USA, the big US oil companies can oppose implementation of green energy vehicles and that's why electric vehicles aren't as prevalent in the West as in China. Because of Source: New energy vehicles in China wikipedia.org/wiki/New_energy_vehicles_in_China
    1
  25850.  @urbanistgod  Who says you're not supposed to use VPN? So many foreign companies come to China and set up shop here, and they require access to Western websites to operate. So the government grants them VPN license, so how is VPN illegal? And I have already given you the reply that ancient civilizations had censorship (Roman censors, Chinese embroidered uniform guard) and all you done is dismissed them that's all? You don't even bother to address all my historical points about empires, kings and emperors and censors, about ordinary citizens voting, so what exactly have you proved? Why wasn't democracy popular outside of Greece during ancient times?
    1
  25851.  @urbanistgod  Besides electric vehicles, China is also home to world's largest high-speed railway network, dwarfing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail. Our high-speed trains are world-class, the world's fastest and yet the journeys are very smooth and pleasant. Passengers have experimented balancing objects like coins, stationery, smartphones, on their edges near the windows of trains travelling at 350 kph, and the objects have remained undisturbed (even water surfaces remain still) for long periods. Here is one such video: Video: Watch how long coin can balance on high-speed train traveling at 350 kph youtube.com/watch?v=fumYdO9XknE Before the advent of high-speed rail, during Spring Festival (Chinese New Year) people in China would return to our home provinces to celebrate the New Year with our families and the journey home would often take several days by conventional rail. But since high-speed rail was introduced to China, commuting times have been reduced from days to mere hours.
    1
  25852.  @urbanistgod  I have discussed my stance as thoroughly as possible already and you have dismissed virtually every point I brought up: -Ordinary citizens can't be trusted to vote properly, they may make decisions based on emotions, not logic. Or they lack political awareness of their countries situation. -Political power should be in the hands of elites (nobles, priests, etc) because they are politically aware of the country's situation. -History is full of authoritarianism, Aztec Empire, Inca Empire, Indian Empire, Achaemenid Empire, Akkadian Empire, Babylonian Empire, Byzantine Empire, Egyptian Empire, Chinese Empire, British Monarchy, French Monarchy, -Democracy has a long history of failure (Athenian, Spartan, Greek, Roman) and democracy was never popular outside of Greece. -Modern Western democracy has only 100-200 years of history, so it doesn't necessarily mean it will be successful -Chinese people aren't oppressed, Chinese tourists, students, companies and investors can be found all over the globe. -Chinese Internet is the world's largest internet and there are many websites in Chinese. -Censorship worked for great ancient civilization, so why can't we apply censorship today? -Besides, Chinese can still use VPN to access Western websites so what's your point? I have literally refuted all your points and argued my case several times already isn't it? But you just keep on dismissing my points?
    1
  25853.  NOYDB  Tell you what, if Google is blocked in China, then just use Bing or Yahoo then. What's the big deal? Why make mountain out of a molehill?
    1
  25854.  NOYDB  Youtube is blocked by not banned, so what's your point? Just use VPN like I said.
    1
  25855.  @dhk1126  Maybe China block Youtube so as to drum up business for the VPN companies?
    1
  25856.  @urbanistgod  "why people can’t access to the entire internet?" How do you even define the entire internet? You mean access the darknet is that it? Because I clearly proven that with VPN, Chinese people can access the entire Internet so what's your problem? Your point has been refuted by the simple fact that Chinese people can use VPN. Even so, you think Chinese people aren't travelling outside of China and going to Hong Kong to use the Internet there or some other countries' Internet?
    1
  25857.  @urbanistgod  Your entire paragraph is a just you repeating back and forth several times in order to create a wall of text and make it seem like a debate (when you are not even defining your points properly) And like I said, you just ignored all the historical aspect, the empires, the kings, the emperors, and pretend like they never existed. And I even shown that hardly any country uses democracy except for Greece, and it was never popular elsewhere.
    1
  25858.  @urbanistgod  Democracy was literally forced onto other countries by foreign powers. British colonies like India, Singapore, Hong Kong, etc, were forced to take on democracy by British colonials. as were America, Canada, Australia, etc. The USA took democracy further during Korean War, Vietnam War, etc. Even in 21st century, the USA is bombing Middle Eastern countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, etc, and cutting those countries "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. So what makes you think these countries willing accepted democracy then? And like I said, what do you mean "why people can’t access to the entire internet?" Why don't you define the "entire internet"? I mean why don't people access the darknet, the hidden underbelly of the Internet used for clandestine purposes? And I have already proven that Chinese people can still use VPN, so your point has literally been refuted already.
    1
  25859.  @urbanistgod  Once again, Politics should be about doing what's right, not necessary what's popular. Sometimes, the popular thing may not be right and the right thing may not be popular. Democracy is only doing what's popular not necessarily what's right. I mean, people voting for what they want, may not be what's right for the country. Look at the British people voting to leave EU (because that's what they WANT, but not necessarily what's right for the country)
    1
  25860.  @urbanistgod  Now, what is this new term? REGULAR Internet? You keep on coming up with these terms and leave them vague so how am I suppose to interpret it? The Chinese REGULAR Internet consists of accessing Chinese websites like Baidu, Youku, Weibo, etc, that make use of Chinese language interface, because this is the REGULAR Internet for China. So what makes you think Chinese people can't access REGULAR Internet for ourselves? And like I said, if Chinese want to access other websites, we can always use VPN, so your point has already been refuted so many times already.
    1
  25861.  @urbanistgod  "In a democracy there’s a potential for the government to do something right AND do something that is what people want." Your point makes no sense. I can also make the claim that in an authoritarian government, there's a potential for the government to do something right AND do something that is what people want too. For example, China switching from fossil fuels to green energy is something that is right and also what people want (unless they want to continue fossil fuels)
    1
  25862.  @urbanistgod  Authoritarian governments can also choose to change policies, and if the leader isn't competent, he/she will eventually be overthrown. I mean China's 5000 history has many emperors, some benevolent and some tyrannical, and yet the dynasties change with the times, old emperors eventually pass on to their sons, and so on, so I can also make the claim that sooner or later, it will be changed. Therefore, what's the difference between you're point and mine? About the Internet again? Firstly, why do you claim censorship is a problem? Apparently, its not a problem in China, and many people in China go about their daily lives with censorship, so how is it a problem then? You think you are inflating the problem, but really the only problem seems to be you yourself. And I have already shown that Chinese people can use VPN to access Western websites many, many times, so again, what's the problem? You are the problem that's what, with your making a big hullabaloo out of a supposed problem, when Chinese people can simply use VPN to solve it. Or just travel outside of China, or go to Hong Kong, if we want to access the REGULAR internet that other countries use. What's the big deal?
    1
  25863.  @urbanistgod  Google (which bought YouTube) choose to leave China's market of its own accord, after failing to capture a significant portion of China's market to Chinese competitor Baidu. According to Forbes: Google's market share in China climbed from 15% (mid-2006) to 31% (2010) but Baidu's market share rose from 47% (mid-2006) to 64% (2010) which is huge leade Source: Forbes: Why Google Is Quitting China forbes.com/2010/01/15/baidu-china-search-intelligent-technology-google.html Baidu also offered several attractive packages and advanced features which appealed to Chinese, over Google, so in the end, Google chose to withdraw of its own accord. After failing to win over China's majority market share from Baidu.
    1
  25864.  @urbanistgod  Then you might as well claim "Why don't everyone have access to food? Or why don't all 1.4 billion people in China use the internet, instead of 700 million? People still go about living their lives, with or without censorship, with or without VPN, so what's the problem? What laws in China restrict the use of VPN?
    1
  25865.  @dhk1126  "People in democracy vote for their own benefits. Voting for a president is not about picking a person who is the most handsome or beautiful, but about picking a person who represents their won rights and needs." That's why its a popularity contest. Why was people like Donald Trump voted into power then?
    1
  25866.  @urbanistgod  Aren't you the one constantly repeating yourself about censorship? I have already shown that people in China can use VPN to access Western websites, so what's the problem then?
    1
  25867.  @srivthefour7468  Therefore, in this age of 8 billion "connected" people, censorship is ever more important, wouldn't you agree? Also, what makes you think the ordinary people know how to govern themselves? Consider this question: Which is more qualified to lead the country? The People or The Government? If you selected The People, then why do countries need a government then?
    1
  25868.  @reymiguelperez6643  "How many authoritarian or communist country in the world right now?...So democracy being less popular in your point is invalid." I answered this earlier: "Democracy was literally forced onto other countries by foreign powers. British colonies like India, Singapore, Hong Kong, etc, were forced to take on democracy by British colonials. as were America, Canada, Australia, etc. The USA took democracy further during Korean War, Vietnam War, etc. Even in 21st century, the USA is bombing Middle Eastern countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, etc, and cutting those countries "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place." So what makes you think these countries willing accepted democracy then?
    1
  25869.  @okisdr  "How many of his own people did Mao kill?" It was Chinese Civil War, so of course Chinese killed Chinese. Just like in American Civil War, Americans killed Americans. Or Koreans killed Koreans in Korean war. Or Vietnam War. Or any civil war for that matter.
    1
  25870.  Toto Ian  "神州 Shenzhou king and emperors are cowardly" And so are Presidents as well. Why did US President Bush ordered invasion of Iraq on suspicion of harboring WMD, but after the war, no WMD were ever found? Didn't Bush hide behind the brave American soldiers fighting and dying on foreign soil?
    1
  25871.  @dhk1126  China has this political doctrine called "Mandate of Heaven" in which a competent king is allowed to remain in power, while an incompetent king will eventually be overthrown by revolution. And it worked for 5000 years for China, so why can't we continue this process? Look, President Xi Jinping has shown to be capable leader of China, so by abolishing the term limits, he can remain in power to maximise the benefits to China. Whereas look at Us President Trump, having to step down after 4-8 years. He can't make any long-term plans for American (spanning more than 10 years) when he has to step down. Whereas the Chinese government has put forth many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's direction and future in 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050, etc, and to set specific goals for China to achieve.
    1
  25872.  @urbanistgod  I have argued my case thoroughly, and the fact is you can't refute my points at all. Ordinary people don't always vote responsibly, or they base decisions on emotions not logic, or they simply lack political awareness. So why let ordinary people vote in elections regarding the country's future? Why not let those who know how to govern, govern? Authoritarianism and Oligarchies were commonplace in ancient times, even the world's largest democracy, India, was once an authoritarian empire where the Caste System dominated, and the Brahmins (the priests at the top of the caste pyramid) made all the important political decisions because they were the most well-read Caste. And it worked for India! That's why the Caste system endured in India for so long, up to the modern day, because that was how their country was run since ancient times.
    1
  25873.  @srivthefour7468  Authoritarian governments may also get replaced with different people. For example, the older, hardliner Chinese communist members are slowly retiring or dying off, while the new, fresher, younger communist members are slowly taking their place in the party. According to the following source, the CCP consists of: -There are 1.7 million new CCP members aged under 35. -Of new members, almost 39% had University or Graduate Degrees -The number of female members also increased, the figures showed, with 21.7 million women on the party roll last year. -Members identified as workers totalled 7.3 million, the figures showed, while 26 million were engaged in farming, herding or fishing. -A total of 12.5 million were identified as professionals, 9 million as administrative staff while 7.4 million were described as workers in party and government offices. -The total membership was 87.8 million. Source: China’s Communist Party now larger than the population of Germany scmp.com/news/china/policies-politics/article/1829407/chinas-communist-party-enlists-million-new-members So of course, the CCP government is constantly changing, with older members retiring and newer Western-educated communist members joinin the party to vote on issues. There are also farmers, herders, fishermen, and other workers in the CCP party.
    1
  25874.  @urbanistgod  The thing is why are you so short-sighted? You only look back at only 100-200 years of history, when Britain was a colonial superpower spreading its ideology and forcing democracy onto its colonies. You don't look back further, by 1000 years, or by 2000 years, and see that throughout history, human civilization has always been mostly authoritarian, and that democracy failed in Rome and was never popular outside of Greece. Human society and behavior is more or less, cyclic throughout history, Ideologies come and go all the time, but authoritarianism remains prominent. The last 100-200 years of history is not representative of the previous 1000-2000 years of human history. You can't refute this fact, that's why you constantly talk about censorship instead of authoritarianism and democracy.
    1
  25875.  @urbanistgod  If anyone's defeated here, its you. I have argued my case firmly and with conviction, citing numerous sources, quoting historical accounts, and demonstrating that democracy was actually forced upon the world, by the British, in just 200 years. I even argued logically that ordinary citizens aren't qualified to vote, and its the elites who have the political awareness to make important decisions regarding the country's future. You lost, that's why you keep bringing up censorship, because you have no argument for democracy other than claiming "its right". Democracy is the popular thing, but not necessary the right thing, as I have been saying.
    1
  25876.  @urbanistgod  In this short lecture, a Chinese professor explains the "genetic defects" of Western democracy. Video: The three ‘genetic defects’ of the Western model youtube.com/watch?v=G_JeHH5mW14 1. Assumption that all human beings are rational. This is not true, there are rational and irrational people (even ultra-irrational) when it comes to casting their votes. Politicians prey on voters irrationality with false promises of making the country great again. Even Hitler preyed on German people's resentment towards Treaty of Versailles and promised to make Germany great again. 2. The belief that all Rights are Absolute. Individual rights are overinflated and individual responsibilities are declining. There are so many "rights" which lead to conflict (gay rights versus anti-gay rights, abortionist rights versus non-abortionists rights. religious believers rights vs non-believer rights) This immense strain is tearing apart the fabric of society as everyone is lobbying for their own rights. 3. The belief that democracy is absolute. No reforms can be made to USA, unless it amends its constitution, but changing America's constitution is notoriously difficult and in the end, hardly any change is done Political systems need to evolve with time but USA is undergoing "political stagnation" because it is too rigid with its own constitution.
    1
  25877.  @urbanistgod  You clearly can't refute my points that's why you were defeated. You don't even bother to summarize your points, because you know just how bad they are and how biased they are, and that's why you refuse to summarize your points. You can't refute me, that's why you resort to alternative attacks like calling me 50 cents, or bringing up censorship (which even related to the discussion).
    1
  25878.  @urbanistgod  Censorship is necessary, because a country needs its citizens to believe in its leaders right to rule. China is flourishing today because Chinese citizens believe in their leaders so they work hard to improve living conditions and advance technology for the sake of the country. Whereas in the USA for example, Americans have become cynical, obsessed with their own rights and a decline in their individual responsibilities. They mock, poke fun and ridicule their leaders, so much that no one takes their leaders seriously and it becomes extremely difficult for the US government to make any move, because inevitably, they'll trample on someone's rights. Americans don't seem to care about America and some have already given up on their country. Whereas in China, there is a strong sense of nationalism which has been cultivated through censorship and promoting Chinese achievements. Thus, in short, a country is doomed to fail, if its own citizens don't believe in their own country. Censorship helps promote nationalism, which is the glue that keeps a nation's people together. This is why China needs censorship.
    1
  25879.  @urbanistgod  "神州 Shenzhou Most civilized developed countries are democratic and it’s working well, but of course, you’re gonna talk about U.S issues." So if I don't talk about U.S issues, then what about Brexit? The former British PM David Cameron had a referendum on whether Britain should leave the UK (he is personally against Brexit) but the poll results show British citizens their country want to leave EU. And Cameron resigned as a result. Brexit is a mess for British politicians even the latest British PM Theresa May can't even handle Brexit negotiations, so what a mess Britain has gotten into. All because they let ordinary citizens participate in political decisions affecting the country's future.
    1
  25880.  @urbanistgod  China's economy won't work without censorship. Look at India, world's largest democracy, and it doesn't have censorship like China, it has world's 2nd largest population so its workforce is similar to China's. Many Indians speak English (favorable for Westerners) but most Chinese struggle with English even today. India is also founding member of WTO in 1995, whereas China had a late entry in 2001. Yet despite these advantages India has, China has long overtaken India in many sectors. -China is world's 2nd largest economy, India is world's 7th. -China has world's 2nd highest military spending, India has world's 5th. -China has world's 2nd highest research spending, while India is 6th. -China has literacy rate of 96.4%, India has literacy rate of 72.1%. -China has Global Hunger Index of 7.5(low) whereas India's is 31.4(serious) -China is world's 3rd largest arms exporter. India is world's largest arms importer. -China has produced many Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Oppo, Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, JD, Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, Bank of China, ICBC, AgBank, China Construction Bank, State Grid, Sinopec, China National Petroleum, China Minmetals, Ping An Insurance, China Shipbuilding Industry, China State Shipbuilding, and many of them made into top business magazines like Forbes Global 2000 or Fortune Global 500 Sources: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies Forbes Global 2000 wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Global_2000 Fortune Global 500 wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_Global_500 List of the largest shipbuilding companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_shipbuilding_companies But where are all the famous Indian companies?
    1
  25881.  @urbanistgod  "Why don’t you compare with the United States?" Hey! you told me earlier not to talk about the United States didn't you? So why can't I talk about India then, since it has similar population size to China, also being dirt-poor country once like China? So you think its all "coincidence" that India is the largest democracy and they’re not developed like China? You clearly lost the argument, that's why you keep on nitpicking on my points that's all.
    1
  25882.  @urbanistgod  North Korea is not doing well today, because it is currently at war with the United States (which the USA first declared on NK back during Korean War). North Korea is unable to attract investors to come invest in the country, because of USA slapping crippling sanctions on DPRK and stymieing its economic growth. In 2016, it was revealed that North Korea actually approached the United States about conducting formal peace talks to formally end the war. China wants to develop better trade relations with North Korea and help open up its economy, but we can't do much, with the US sanctions in place. Even some Western investors like the famous American businessman and financial commentator based in Singapore, want's to open up investments in DPRK, but he can't do anything with the US sanctions in place. "I'm a citizen in the Land of the Free, but I cannot invest in North Korea?" - American Jim Rogers, Video: Trump is making China great again: Jim Rogers youtube.com/watch?v=D4Kk6miiymk Therefore, North Korea is poor not because of authoritarianism (in fact, Jim Rogers says Kim Jong Um is making sweeping changes to its government) but because the USA is slapping crippling sanctions and preventing DPRK from modernizing.
    1
  25883.  @urbanistgod   What do you mean your example with North Korea is good while my example with India is bad? I have literally shown that North Korea is poor because of US sanctions slapped on it and preventing it from opening up, what has authoritarianism got to do with this? You example of North Korea failed to show how exactly authoritianism is bad. And I thought you said earlier that you don't want me to mention the USA right? And if you want an example of authoritian regime that is rich, just look at Saudi Arabia. It's a dictatorship but its doing very well isn't it? And you know why India is suffering under democracy? It's because they only have low literacy rate. So why allow the entire population of India to vote in political decisions, when over 25% of India's population is illiterate? Every 1 in 4 Indians are illiterate yet you still allow them to participate in decisions that will affect their country's future? So isn't it you that are unable to refute my points.
    1
  25884.  @srivthefour7468  Prisoners take up space and resources. America has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and its prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity, that sometimes the US government release convicts back on to the streets in order to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: List of countries by incarceration rate wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate Such a huge prison population represents a massive drain on the countries resources, for maintenance and upkeep of its prisoners. Worst, many ex-convicts find it difficult to find work, so they return to life of crime and land up back in jail. China observes capital punishment laws so by executing prisoners who've committed horrible crimes, China is freeing up resources that would have otherwise been spent on upkeeping a huge prison population like what the USA is suffering. This freed resources can then be spent elsewhere like on growing our economy. That's why China is so successful here.
    1
  25885.  @urbanistgod  You can't refute my points, because your points don't stand up to scrutiny. Look, you just claim "神州 Shenzhou North Korea is the way it is because there’s no democracy .... etc" Did you know that when Korea was partitioned into North Korea (USSR) and South Korea (USA), the North Korea was actually doing better off economically, while South Korea was poor and its GDP was even than even some sub-saharan African countries, under democracy? North Korea only began to decline, because of USA slapping crippling sanctions on it, and refusing to sign a peace treaty with DPRK in order to formally end the Korean War, and allow investment in DPRK. And look at Saudi Arabia, an authoritarian dictatorship, but its economy is progressing so well because it is good allies with USA. I heard in Saudi Arabia, women were forbidden to even drive, and Saudi Prince had brutally murdered a journalist named Khashoggi, and yet President Trump stands with Saudi Arabia and called Khashoggi "a traitor of the people." Source: Trump 'stands with' Saudi Arabia and defends crown prince over Khashoggi theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/20/trump-saudi-arabia-jamal-khashoggi-crown-prince
    1
  25886.  @srivthefour7468  Let's get this straight. Jail time is not fun and games. You have committed a crime and broken laws, so you are being punished by being sentenced to jail for your crimes. But jail time in the USA isn't working to reform criminals, because many released ex-convicts don't return to proper society, and many return to life of crime, and wound up back in jail. Because to them, life is easier in jail than it is outside, that's why US prison populations have swollen to the point it becomes a burden on US resources. China observes Capital Punishment, which not only frees up resources from upkeep and maintenance of prison populations, but it also acts as a severe deterrent for would-be criminals, by making them fearful of the consequences of getting caught. In the West, capital punishment is rare, so many criminals in Western countries commit crimes, thinking that they can always get away with it, because they won't be sentenced to death. Your soft punishments are making it more "attractive" for potential criminals to turn to life of crime. Even if you don't execute them, China also has reeducation camps in which people are receiving free education and being trained in skills necessary to prepare them for the workplace. How is this a bad idea? The ultimate goal of prison is to reform citizens to become productive members of society, not encourage people to stay in jail and waste their life away. And what's the link between prisoner incarceration and capital punishment, and having an elected government? Are you simply trying to take potshots at other countries form of government?
    1
  25887. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  25888.  @chungusultimate  Israel made the claim that 40 babies had been headed, and even the POTUS said he saw the footage. But later the White House walked back his claims and there's no evidence of the 40 babies. There is also no evidence of rape despite the claims made by Israel.
    1
  25889. +What are you looking at? I think you aren't real Chinese at all when you even got my name wrong. +Captain Midnight China is against North Korean nuclearization as well and Chinese government clearly stated that they oppose North Korean missile testing. So why is it China's fault? Japan was the one who invaded North Korea during WW2, and now you are shielding Japan from North Korea if they choose to retaliate? You are clearly biased against Japanese warcrimes that's all. What does your own personal opinion about Japanese go to do with what they think? If Japanese truly oppose war, then why did they even invade China in the first place and start Sino-Japanese war? You keep bringing up your own personal experience, and completely ignore whole history of China-Japan war and leave it out of your discussion. Japanese war is real history that really happened, despite what Japanese people think, so again how can you even use your own personal opinion as a point here? Japan already have "criminal" record here isn't it? Now you are in Philippines and claim that Philippines do not care? You think you can represent people solely based on which country you visited? You can't answer a question about Asian culture, so you resort to claiming Chinese censorship? Even Koreans are protesting Japanese denial of "comfort" women and that is still happening regardless of Chinese censorship, so what do you even understand about the relations of East Asians towards each other? This is non-Chinese and non-censored source about Koreans protesting against Japanese bbc.com/news/magazine-22680705 so why blame Chinese censorship here? You claim people don't care about Japanese warcrimes then what about these elderly women who personally experienced such suffering at hands of the Japanese? Here is video about Philippines protesting outside Japanese embassy youtube.com/watch?v=mEMX2Qwctq8 It is completely unrelated to Chinese censorship. You have demonstrated that you clearly know nothing about the relations between China, Korea, Japan, Philippines, etc, and so on. You claim to have visited or lived in those countries but you don't even have any evidence to show what the locals think of Japanese wartime atrocities.
    1
  25890. +Rhyan Jill Baytos Philippines only fought Japan for 3 years, from 1942-1945, whereas China fought Japan for 13 years from 1931-1945 (Sino-Japanese War) and worst is Korea, who was under Japanese occupation for 35 years from 1910-1945. Even Europeans fought Nazis for only 6 years from 1939-1945. So even if you or your grandfather don't resent the Japanese, what about Koreans and Chinese who suffered under Japanese hands for more than 10 years? +Captain Midnight You clearly shown that you are not Japanese, neither are you Korean, Filipino, etc. so what justification do you even have to speak for Japanese people not want war or for Filipinos? You claim I am Chinese apologist, then aren't you being Japanese war apologist? Everything I said about Japanese war atrocities is completely dismissed by you, so what even makes you qualified to speak for Asians at all? Why are you even interfering in Asian issue in the first place, if you weren't not affected by Japanese war? Like I said, just because you talk to some Japanese people, means you are somehow qualified to represent all Japanese people? Have you actually asked Japanese people what they felt about Japan during WW2? There are Japanese people today continuing to believe that they were the victims of WW2, because of American bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, so again, why are you being apologists for Japanese war crimes? You keep on saying Japanese of the past aren't the Japanese today, is somehow going to placate the victims of Japanese aggression? Why don't you tell that directly to the elderly S. Korean comfort women today? If North Korea is targeting US bases in Japan, then why does Japan continue to let US military bases occupy its lands in Okinawa? There are even cases of US troops stationed in Okinawa raping the locals, and the Japanese government can't do anything about it. According to the following source, Okinawa’s anti-base governor, Takeshi Onaga, told the crowd he regretted being powerless to prevent crimes by US military personnel, two decades after the abduction and rape of a 12-year-old girl by three US servicemen. Thousands in Okinawa protest alleged rape by U.S. sailor japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/03/22/national/thousands-protest-in-okinawa-over-alleged-rape-of-japanese-tourist-by-u-s-serviceman/ I take my sources outside of Chinese censorship, so again, why are you constantly bringing up Chinese censorship in the first place? You have finally revealed that you are American, so again, why do you care about Asian issues between Japan, Korea, Philippines, etc? You aren't Asian, so what do you know of Asian issues? After Japanese surrender, American shielded Japan from any further retaliation by China, Korea and other Japanese victims, so why did USA choose to protect the aggressor country of WW2? You are clearly being Japanese war apologist, so what right do you have to speak for Asians? Even today, Japan is being target of North Korean Nuclear missiles because of America, like you said isn't it?
    1
  25891. I don't know why you people keep claiming everything I said is Chinese propaganda, propaganda, propaganda. when Western sources have also demonstrated the level of atrocity Japanese soldiers stooped to. During Unit 731, Japanese soldiers conducted ghastly inhumane experiments on Chinese prisoners, including men, women and even children, such as live vivisection without anesthesia, removing organs to study the effect of diseases. The person was kept alive and conscious during the experiment, because the Japanese thought that death of the subject would affect the results. People had their limbs frozen and amputated to study blood loss, sometimes removed and attached to opposite sides of their bodies. There were even unlucky prisoners who had their stomachs removed and oesophagus reattached to the intestines, just to see how long humans can survive without the stomachs. Chinese women had it the worst in Unit 731. Japanese scientists injected prisoners with Sexually Transmitted Diseases and forced them to spread the STD to other prisoners at gunpoint and impregnate female prisoners. They then cut open the wombs of the mothers to study the effect of STD on fetuses, often resulting in death of mother and child. Some Japanese even conducted experiments on children they fathered with female prisoners. Imagine if you were prisoner in Unit 731, injected with STD and forced to have sex with prisoners at gunpoint. Imagine if you are woman, being raped and impregnated and being vivisected to have experiments conducted on your baby. If Japanese wanted to study STD, why not inject everyone with STD, instead of injecting one persons and forcing them to spread it to other prisoners? After Japanese surrender, the Japanese destroyed most of the evidence (so there could be even more chilling stories left untold) and America granted the Japanese responsible for Unit 731 immunity, in exchange for acquiring the data Japanese scientists gleamed from Unit 731. So why are people like Captain Midnight being apologists for Japanese war crimes? Because he/she is American? Why everything I said is considered propaganda and dismissed immediately, simply because I am Chinese? You mean just because Japan surrendered after WW2, suddenly means all is forgiven? Source Wikipedia: Unit 731 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_731
    1
  25892. +Robert Kyle I don't understand, what has "Is Italty BETTER than England" even got to do with this topic? This topic is about Japan and China, not Italy and England, so what is wrong with bringing up historical issues between Japan and China? Those historical issues have largely influenced the modern Japan and China's relationship. So far, majority of my topics is about Japan and China, so am I actually straying off topic at all? What about you suddenly trying to digress by introducing Italy and England into this discussion about Japan and China? Just glance through this thread and you can see many cases of people expressing derision for China, so why do you claim I am selectively ignoring stuff? Are you also selectively ignoring what others have said about China too? People have said "China is sh!t country" and expressing various human rights violations in China and about noisy, loud and rude Chinese tourists, but you act blind towards those comments? Who are you to claim I am selectively ignoring stuff, when apparently you do it as well? You are correct in that 100 years has not been rosy for China. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking our tea, but Chinese people didn't want to sell it, so they waged two wars with China which we lost and were forced to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want, because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. The British forced open Chinese port cities, like Shanghai, to act as drug distribution hubs to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. The port city of Hong Kong was even taken from China, and when British renounced their colonial rule, Hong Kong should have been fully returned to China, instead of being "half-returned" with its own existing government. Exactly what did China ever did to countries like Britain and Japan to deserve this? China gifted your countries with inventions like paper, printing, compass and gunpowder, but you have used guns to wage war on China and steal our lands and territories and forced drugs onto Chinese people to weaken our country. China did not invade your countries to visit such atrocities upon your people. All we want is to be left alone and to defend our homes and protect our loved ones. You claim this is being "victim" complex, when your countries soldiers are the ones on Chinese territories? Which country in the world does not protest the presence of unwanted foreign troops on our territory? You think this "victim" mentality does not have any basis behind its creation? Once again, who are you to force Chinese people to forgive what Japan did to China back during WW2? Even today, there are Jews who can't forgive Germany for what they did to their people, so who are you to tell Chinese people to forgive their scars? You are not the real victims here, so how do you know their pain, and to tell them to forgive just like that? Can't you even see that you are being Japanese war apologist here? Everything I said about Japanese war crime is instantly dismissed by you, so why do you choose to do that with Japan?
    1
  25893. +Owen Ooi It is your own personal opinion about what you feel about China and Japan. I don't understand why I can't "rant" about Japan's past, but you can rant about China's past? The Great Chinese Famine of 1950s was also partially due to natural causes, so why are you blaming it entirely on Mao Zedong's failure? He can't control the weather to prevent famine, and according to reports submitted from the farming collectives, everything was proceeding smoothly and there was enough food, so of course, Mao would suspect nothing is amiss. The Great Leap Forward was expected to last 5 years, but after it was discovered it wasn't working, it was shut down after 3 years and investigated by the communist party. Mao Zedong later made a self-criticism and stepped down from being state chairman, and the communist party has long since, admitted the failures of Mao's Great Leap Forward. I also don't understand why you equate Chinese people being unintentionally starved as being on the same level as Japanese invading China to commit atrocities. The majority of war crimes during Malayan Emergency were actually committed by the British. According to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_war_crimes#1948.E2.80.931960:_Malayan_Emergency -War crimes: In the Batang Kali massacre, about 24 unarmed villagers were killed by British troops. The British government claimed that these villagers were insurgents attempting to escape but this was later known to be entirely false as they were unarmed, nor actually supporting the insurgents nor attempting to escape after being detained by British troops. No British soldier was prosecuted for the murder at Batang Kali. -War crimes: includes beating, torturing, and killing by British troops and communist insurgents of non-combatants. -War crimes: As part of the Briggs' Plan devised by British General Sir Harold Briggs, 500,000 people (roughly ten percent of Malaya's population) were eventually removed from the land, had tens of thousands of their homes destroyed. Note: Communists insurgents did commit war crimes but they weren't at the same level as the British according to the above source. North Korea was China's ally back then, and had aided Chinese communist party in fighting the KMT and eventually founding People's Republic of China. China only joined the Korean war, because USA had joined in supporting South Korea against North Korea and to repay North Korean help during Chinese Civil War. Japan was occupied by American forces after WW2 surrender, which disarmed it, so how could it have possibly committed any more war crime under US occupation? Aren't you being biased here as well? Even today, Japan is bound by 1945 WW2 treaty (Article 9 of Japanese Constitution) forbidding it from going to war, so of course they can't declare war on other countries so easily now. I don't understand why you people are being Japanese war crime apologists, constantly dismissing Japanese war crimes" and saying "Forgive them" or "Don't blame the current generation" and then you contradict yourselves when you don't forgive Chinese crimes against our own people and blame current generation of Chinese being rude and noisy. Do you people actually notice the irony in your own comment, before excusing the war crimes of Japanese, and proceeding to blame Chinese people for crimes against our own people? You can forgive Japanese crimes against Chinese, but not Chinese crimes against Chinese? I mean, are you people really blind and fail to see the hypocrisy within your own remark? You can forgive Japanese war crimes, and then next moment blame Chinese people for crimes not committed against your countries? What act did China do that rivals the war crimes Japanese soldiers committed on Asia? Even if France, Germany, UK, Japan recovered post-war, they did not succeed to become world's 2nd largest economy, or to have strongest military to be potential rival to USA. You are Chinese Malaysian, so you grew up outside of China, and weren't subject to China's turbulent periods during 1940-1970s. So what do you know of China's struggles during that period? Modern China was built by Chinese living in China during those chaotic periods, not by Malaysian Chinese, so what does China care about Malaysian Chinese like you? You left our homeland to seek better life in Malaysia, while the rest of China stayed and brought China up from poor, starving country into economic juggernaut with strong army capable defending China from further invasion. Nobody cares about China, except Chinese people. Nobody can defend China except Chinese people. Nobody wants to see China succeed as a nation, except Chinese people. Even Chinese people like you who left China, and continue to detest their homeland after leaving. Aren't you almost the same as foreigner mindset now? You have adopted Westerner views and now despise your homeland, despite its struggles and successes, and forgiven Japan for its crimes.
    1
  25894. +徐东东 我同意。The Foxconn suicides was only an isolated case and does not reflect whole China's suicide rate. According to World Health Organization en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate Out of every 100,000 people, Japan has 15.4 cases of suicide as compared to China's 8.5 cases. Not related, but South Korea has even worst rate of 24.1. It goes to show that these countries are under a lot of stress and pressure mentally. Japanese people may be unfailingly polite and courteous, almost to a fault, but while this reflects well on their national image to foreigners, it is probably bad on their mental health internally if they do not find away to relieve this accumulated stress, which could account for the high suicide rate. The people in China are loud, rude and noisy by comparison, but it helps relieve the mental stress of Chinese people after hard day's work. We are humans after all, not robots, and we can't be expected to be unfailingly polite and quiet at all times, like the Japanese are, especially given that China is much more populous country. Who would expect world's most populous country to be quiet and not rowdy? But there will be people are probably going label me biased anti-Japanese propagandist anyway, even when my statistics are taken from WHO, and that my opinion is my own.
    1
  25895. +Captain Midnight "Philippines only fought Japan for 3 years." What is wrong about the above statement? Did I talk about Philippines war with Spain or United States? Why are you bringing those issues into this discussion about Japan and China? Whether I answered his questions or not, is between me and him, not you, so what are you butting in? You gave no indication of your ancestry, only that you refer to yourself as American, so how do you expect me to know your exact ancestry? So you mean just because its a new generation of Japanese, means the slate is somehow wiped clean? And the new slate only records "modern" Chinese atrocities? What sort of biased thinking is this here? You constantly label me a bigot, but then, there are other people that haven't forgiven Japanese war crimes. Look at South Korean "comfort" women who are now in their senior age. They clearly protest against Japanese mislabeling of comfort women, so are you man enough to call these grandmothers "bigots" like what you are doing to me? I don't insult you or call you names for your views, so why are you resorting to insulting me now? I am not alone in protesting Japanese war crimes and I have shown videos of Koreans and Filipinos protesting, so why you label me a bigot? Footage of Korean women sexually enslaved by Japanese soldiers in WWII revealed for the first time youtube.com/watch?v=GIC481VxVlE You never did answer my questions about what Japanese people felt about Japan during WW2?. You just claimed to have talked to Japanese academia that's all. But Japanese academia do not necessary represent the views of all Japanese. Whenever did I defend the atrocities committed by Chinese government? I admitted to Mao's disastrous policies many times in my posts, so who are you to constantly label me an apologist? On the other hand, you are clearly dismissing Japanese war crimes many times (and even claiming not to dismiss it) so again, how are you not being Japanese war crime apologist here? You label me illiterate when you don't even read carefully what I said? Most of your comments is just you hurling insults at me. Do I ever call you bigot or use vulgar language against you, simply for expressing your views? Why resort to low brow insults against me, when you have no content to show for your claims? Americans are using Japan as forward base, and because of that, North Korea is targeting Japan, so isn't the current crisis in East Asia the fault of Americans? Who is the country sending warships and aircraft carrier strike groups halfway across the globe to Asia here? You claim to be doing "something" political about your government, but what exactly have you done, when Americans voted for Trump? I use non-Chinese websites for my information, so again, what has Chinese censorship got to do with this issue at all? What about South Koreans protesting Japanese ignoring "comfort" women? You see, you claim to represent Japan or Philippines or Americans, but you fail to provide any proof. I have shown examples of protestors in South Korea and Philippines, so what has Chinese censorship got to do with my sources? What do you know about protests in China? Everyday, many Chinese people are protesting against issues like corruption in Chinese government, or forced relocation, or poor working conditions and low wages, etc. In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010. so roughly there are around 490 protests going on in China every day on average. Protest and dissent in China en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protest_and_dissent_in_China You know nothing about China, so why do you presume that Chinese people do not protest against the government?
    1
  25896. +Rhyan Jill Baytos Why don't you ask your grandfather how he feels when his enemy enshrines their Class-A war criminals in a shrine? You aren't East Asian like Chinese or Korean so of course your beliefs would be different from ours, but again, Philippines fought Japanese for lesser time than Koreans and Chinese as shown in those calculations. When did I downplay the legitimacy of Philippines victimhood status? Can you quote me what I said that gives you such impression? When did I brush off your comment as trivial? If you choose not to pursue it, then I don't blame you, but does that mean other people like your grandfather's generation are prohibited from feeling victimized if they want to?
    1
  25897. I mean, the basis of my argument can be summarized into a few points -Why do I get flak for simply mentioning Japanese war atrocities that really did occur? -Why are most of you people constantly jumping in to defend such atrocities? -I have never claimed Chinese government is perfect in any way and have openly admitted to its faults. And I don't resort to insulting you people with vulgar language, simply because your views differ from mine. Vulgarities do not make your argument any stronger and only detract from the main issue at hand.
    1
  25898. Robert Kyle You claimed that I am the one who strayed off topic? Who is the one bringing in Italy and England here in a discussion about China and Japan? Actually the video is about superficial differences between China and Japan, while this thread (started by cho Tech guy) is about Japanese as evil nation and about working life in China and Japan, so how can you even claim that I am going off topic here? You are the one being dense here not me, and are attempting to hijack this thread to talk about Italy and England. British only fought Japan for 3 years from 1942-1945 whereas China fought Japan for 13 years from 1931-1945. Britain was invaded by Nazis while China invaded by Japanese, so our countries respective hatreds are towards our respective enemies. In the same way, Chinese soldiers don't harbour much resentment towards Nazis like British troops, so what is your point here? You are the one first mentioned that "these 100 years have not been rosy for China" so what is wrong with my elaboration on the 100 years of humiliation? It has profound effect on China even till today, and it occurred in 19th century, whereas between France and British was in 1700s. So obviously 19th century is closer than 1700s so why are you labelling my claims ridiculous? France and Britain had 200-300 years to mend their ties, whereas China and Japan had only 100 years. Again when did I ever claim Chinese government did no wrong? You people are obviously putting words that I did not say into my mouth. I have mentioned many times that Chinese government made mistakes, but your selective vision conveniently ignores my statements every time. You must be replying on the wrong thread, if you claim that "we all want to see China succeed". It clearly does not apply to everyone in this thread. Can you actually name any positive encouragement expressed by the foreignersin this thread towards China, our people and government? Otherwise, how can you claim that you all want to see China succeed? I am not blind to the numerous hostile comments directed against my country, but apparently you appear to be. China's government is not perfect and there were many mistakes made under the communist party but nobody's government starts off knowing how to government a country, especially one as big as China. 30 years ago, nobody ever thought Chinese communist party would ever succeed economically or to ever play a major part in the world. When Soviet Union dissolved, many people expected communist China to follow suit, but decades gone by and the government didn't collapse and instead, China is world's 2nd largest economy and a major player in global politics, building a strong army PLA to protect our country and also building roads and infrastructure in other countries. Why are you people picking at our government's flaws instead of celebrating China's success? China's success was founded by our government and people, so who are you people to mock our government system when it has brought such success? It's not easy governing a country as big as China, and surely our government deserves a chance to pursue success with our current system. You claim I am being racist, then exactly what racist remarks did I even said at all? Is pointing out Japanese war atrocities somehow racist? Why is that so? Those ghastly events truly happened, so why is pulling it out of history to support my point considered racist? I feel bad for Chinese women who were raped and impregnated by Japanese. I also feel bad for prisoners injected with STD and forced to have sex at gunpoint to transmit the disease (when simple injection will do) I feel sad for poor South Korean grannies who were accused of being prostitutes and will probably die without being recognised for their suffering in history. How is all of these feelings racist at all? In conclusion, you are partially right in claiming that nationalistic feelings define the relations between China, Japan and also Korea. But my question is, who first caused the relationship to deteriorate to such a state in the first place?
    1
  25899. Captain Midnight Why don't you tell me when I even quoted Philippines and Yasukuni shrine at all? You people are really putting words in my mouth and claiming that I said such things. Again you people result to foul language and insulting me, when you can't come up with a plausible explanation. So when exactly is the slate wiped clean and when are new atrocities inscribed on it? Chinese government has long acknowledged failure of Mao's policies and moved on, so why isn't the slate cleaned for China then? Mao's Cultural Revolution wrecked havoc in Tibet and many Tibetan temples were destroyed (as I acknowledged previously) so why is China's government blamed for rebuilding destroyed temples? Tibetans today have free education up to university and the Chinese government has built roads and railway in Tibet as well as streetlights, electricity, water and gas in Tibetan houses. So why do you still claim the atrocities are still happening in China? Where's your real proof? Tibetan population today On the other hand, what is Japanese government doing to pay back the victims? You people keep on jumping to defend Japan but what exactly has Japan done to make up for its crimes? Why does Japan PM visit Yasukuni? What about those poor South Korean grannies trying to get recognition for their suffering? If you support their cause, then why you label me bigot and not them, when they are true victims of Japanese imperialism? The rest of your statements are just more insults being hurled at me. When did I ever use such foul language or insults against you? Just because your beliefs differ from mine? Who is being immature by resorting to vulgarities instead of actually addressing my points? And you still call me a kid when you cuss and swear at me? I don't protest against Chinese government because I believe it's on the right track. Our government made mistakes in the past, but today it's on the path to a better future. Older communist members with hardline communist views are slowly retiring and dying off, while younger Western educated Chinese are taking up the mantle of leadership in the communist party. Our political change is slow and controlled, not immediate and rapid like President Trump replacing Obama. Why can China be allowed to pursue our own form of governance differ from that of the West? Nobody said ever country has to follow Western democracy in order to be successful, and China is living proof of that. You people have made it very clear that you wish ill upon China, our people and government with your malicious remarks and obscenity. There is no entertaining the remote possibility of you people actually caring about China's success at all. But my three points still stand unanswered. -Why am I getting flak for pointing out Japanese atrocities? Is it wrong to do so? -Why is everyone so quick to jump to Japan's defence? It's unnatural and you people aren't even Japanese for cry out loud, so why claim to speak for Japanese people defense? -I never said China's government is perfect (unlike what you people keep claiming) and Chinese government has committed atrocities on Chinese people. But that is for us Chinese people to rectify ourselves, so why you people claim to speak for Chinese people defense? I can't stop you people resorting to mocking me with vulgarities if you want to. But don't expect me to even take you seriously at a when you argue by cussing.
    1
  25900. Rhyan Jill Baytos War will change the way people behave. It is unlikely that your grandfather "didn't care" about war. Why fight to defend your country when you "don't care"? Soldiers need motivation to fight so did your grandfather really survived war with Japanese soldiers by simply "not caring?" Why do you people answer in riddles and spend so much time copying my own texts? I don't copy and paste a whole bunch of your texts in my posts. You people are just being elusive and refuse to answer any of my questions. If you are younger generation then maybe you don't worship as much or even know the significance of shrines. Do you pray at shrines in your own country? If not, then of course you won't understand the significance behind praying at shrines. Philippines was under American rule for period of time and it could be that younger generations of Filipino do not care about praying at shrines. So obviously it won't affect you.
    1
  25901. Captain Midnight Philippines isn't mentioned in that statement, so why is suddenly Philippines associated with Yasukuni shrine? I don't understand how you people can read words that clearly aren't there. You people are just twisting my words to create meaning where there is none. Who is the one constantly repeating his same old phrase "Younger generation is not to blame" for many times in a row? Look at Japanese PM praying at Yasukuni again and how is it that younger generation of Japanese aren't to blame? Why is younger generation of Japanese government even worshiping the shrine in which Class A Japanese war criminals are housed?
    1
  25902. You people keep on labelling me a bigot, but when did I even said that China is superior to Japan at all? All my statements are about Chinese people suffering at the hands of Japanese, so why is this bigotry? I don't hurl insults at you people for your own views, but you people resort to obscene language against me for expressing my own views here? Exactly who are the bigots on this thread?
    1
  25903. You people are simply too much... I started flinging sh!t at Japanese? Look at all the sh!t you people fling against Chinese people! Why is it you people can get away calling Chinese people loud and noisy, but I can't even criticism Japanese people? Do you people put Japanese people on pedestal and worship them, until they are beyond criticism? The Yasukuni Shrine incident is not only felt by me, but by Chinese people as well as South Koreans. Wouldn't you people fee outraged, if Germans enshrined Hitler and worshiped him? Why are you people constantly dismissing my claims as trivial, when other Chinese people and even South Koreans have expressed regret over Japanese politicians visit to Yasukuni? I am not alone in my feelings towards Yasukuni, and others have joined as shown in following source. Korean gov't expresses regret over Japanese politicians' visit to Yasukuni Shrine youtube.com/watch?v=kkH90oEKSBs So, why can't I blame the younger generation of Japanese when they are the ones honoring Class-A Japanese war criminals? You people just cover up for Japanese's atrocities, both the younger generation and old, when you people aren't even the real victims here? Even today, Japanese textbook controversy results in Japanese publishers omitting details of Japanese atrocities out of some of their historical textbooks. In Germany, it is illegal NOT to mention Hitler and the Nazi atrocities in their textbooks, but apparently this does not apply to Japanese textbooks and they have doctored textbooks to downplay Japan's event in WW2. Why is this acceptable for you people? You blame me for blaming the younger generation of Japanese, when they are the ones refusing to acknowledge Japanese atrocities? I have already shown many cases of young Japanese refusal to accept historical details of Japan during WW2, so why are you blaming me constantly and labeling me a bigot? Searching for the Truth: Japan’s Textbook Denial youtube.com/watch?v=VtQcA2XcTAs Once again I have never denied Chinese government atrocities. In Tibet, only Tibetan monks who separatists are targeted and I already shown that these disputes are political and nature and often overplayed to act as propaganda against Chinese government. For example, Labrang Jigme claims to have been beaten for 2 days. But there are no visible wounds on his body, and neither are there pictures of his wounds. If you were really beaten, won't you take pictures of your wounds to act as solid evidence, instead of simply claiming to be beaten? Where is your real evidence of atrocities against Tibetans? Tibet population have been steadily increasing for the past few decades. According to the following source, Tibet's population was 1.14 million in 1951, when China first took over, but today, Tibet's population has tripled to become 3 million today. So where are your so-called atrocities being committed against Tibetans? Facts & Figures: Tibet's population is.china-embassy.org/eng/zt/ChinasTibet/t427565.htm Falun Gong are notorious for using false allegations in order to propagate their view and gain sympathy for their cause. If you clearly claim to have evidence of Falun Gong organ harvesting, then why not approach Chinese government with the proof and confront them directly by taking them to court over this issue altogether? If there's evidence for such inhuman treatment, then why not expose this evidence to public? Once again, I have never denied that Chinese government did atrocities against Chinese people and you people are putting words in my mouth. If Filipinos (or their grandfathers and grandmothers) don't care about Yasukuni, then I don't pursue this issue. Once again, I never said that Filipinos have to care, but does that give you the right to deny Chinese and Koreans from protesting about Yasukuni? Once again, I shown that China and Korea suffered for longer period (13 and 35 years respectively) under Japanese occupation, than did Philippines (3 years). If you claim I am downplaying Philippines victimhood, then the numbers do not lie, Am I really the bigot here? Who is the one resorting to vulgar language, just because my views differ from yours? Who are the ones insulting me with derogatory terms and calling me bigot? I don't insult you people with words, simply because your views differ from mine, so who here is the real bigot? Who started calling others bigot in the first place? This video has ZERO political angle, that I agree. But this thread, started by choo Tech guy is clear in its intentions, so who are you people to tell me that I am going off track and hijacking this thread? Why is my topic off topic? 19th century IS closer than 1700s, and this is fact. Who is the one first brought up that the last 100 years have not been rosy for China? Why you bring up this issue, then suddenly claim that I am splitting hairs over bad things countries did hundreds of years ago? During the Boxing Rebellion in 19th century, Chinese people wanted foreigners to stop selling opium to us and to leave Chinese lands. But eight nations (USA, UK, Italy, Russia, France... ... even Japan) banded together and form alliance to invade China to kill Chinese on our own turf. There was even cases of mass looting and even rape of Chinese women by the Allies. After the rebellion, China's territories was carved up like a pie and given to the victorious allies, even when they are the ones invading Chinese soil. Chinese government was also forced to pay hefty reparation fines to all eight nations who invaded China to loot our treasures, kill our men and rape our women. Like I said, the only ones who care deeply for China's interest, are Chinese people living here. The only ones who can defend China from foreign invasion, are the Chinese soldiers in PLA. Those that want to see China succeed as a nation, are the Chinese people who went through "hell" for 100 years. "Hell" that you foreigners keep on dismissing again and again. You think building a nation such as China is easily accomplished? Why don't other countries rise to become world's 2nd largest economy if it were that easy, or to have world's 2nd largest military budget, like China? It is clear that most of you people hate China, our people and government, so why pretend to care for China's success at all? Why can't you name any positive points about China expressed by people on this thread? But in this thread, there are so many examples of people jumping to defend Japan for their war crimes. So how can you claim that you people actually care for China's success? Old China is our mother, where we were born and nurtured, and Modern China is our baby, built painfully by the sweat, blood and tears of Chinese people living here. It is not perfect entity and foreigners to our lands may disdain China, but it is our creation, made by the hands of Chinese people. Who are you people to constantly tell Chinese people what we should do or how to behave? You don't like our precious creation, then you are free to leave and never come back. China does not need foreigners who don't share our interests but still pretend to.
    1
  25904. +Captain Midnight Why are you blaming me for what other people said about the Tsunami that hit Japan? The Tsunami is act of nature that swept across Japan, and not of China's doing, whereas Japanese invasion of China was premeditated and an act of war, so both of those events are entirely different so exactly what is the link here? Since when is enshrinement of war criminals a "petty" event? Millions of Chinese, Koreans and other people died by the actions of Class-A war criminals, and yet, these people are allowed to be enshrined within the Japanese holy ancestral shrine? Like I said, what if Hitler and Nazism were enshrined by Germans, and people are publicly able to worship them? You constantly attempt to trivialize such a thing as being "petty" and dismiss it, when it concerns the treatment of war criminals? I already shown that Chinese are not the only ones protesting about Yasukuni, and that Koreans are also doing it, yet you continue to brush off both of our countries' views. I already said Filipinos (including their grandparents) who don't care about Yasukuni at all are allowed not to pursue justice if they don't want to. But that does not mean you can prohibit China and Korean from bringing up Yasukuni. Our countries were affected by Japanese rule for longer duration as compared to Philippines. I am not dragging them into this Yasukuni issue if they choose not to pursue. Regarding your 1st source, did you look at the picture of Larung Gar? It consists of numerous old wooden shanties, stacked side by side, wall to wall, with tin roofs and low hanging electricity cables. It is a fire hazard, and in 2014, there was a fire that destroyed 100 houses in Larung Gar, since the old shacks are adjacent to each other. More than 450 Chinese rescuers, police, and firefighters took part in relief efforts, but the fire had burned uncontrolled for some 11 hours before it was finally extinguished. So Chinese government is demolishing those old, fire-prone structures to make way for modern buildings with running water and electricity. Chinese government is relocating those 5,000 students to temporary housing while Larung Gar is being demolished to make way for new buildings. Fire Destroys 100 Houses at Larung Gar rfa.org/english/news/tibet/fire-01102014181943.html Your 2nd source comes from Central Tibetan Administration, which is the 14th Dalai Lama's exiled government. What makes you think that CTA is able to obtain reliable data about Tibet? It is obviously against China and the CTA is not even a recognised sovereign government by any country. The CTA even receives funding from US CIA in the form of US$1.7 million a year in the 1960s, so isn't it a CIA-sponsored government meant to undermine Chinese rule over Tibet? The CTA is not recognised as a sovereign government by any country en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Tibetan_Administration#Activities_with_other_organisations What are the names of the Taoist disciple, the Uighur farmer, the dozens of Christians and so on? The source can make such vague references without giving away any actual names? How do you expect people to believe this source then? As for Falun Gong harvesting, it is proven to be rumor and was debunked when the number of organs transplants in China do not match up with the allegations of organ harvesting. According to following source, it cannot be true that between 60,000 and 100,000 organ transplants are performed on the Chinese mainland, because the claimed number is equal to the transplant activity of the entire world and is practically impossible, said Jose Ramon Nunez Pena, medical officer of the World Health Organization. He also said that the WHO firmly and without reservation supports China's new ethics-based, transparent organ donor program. Other medical experts like Michael Millis, vice-chairman for global surgery and director at the University of Chicago's School of Medicine Transplant Center, also dismissed the allegations of organ harvesting. Organ harvesting rumors slammed chinadaily.com.cn/china/2016-08/19/content_26531057.htm So I won't admit to anything that has proven to be false according to international experts in the above source.. Chinese government may have committed atrocities, but some allegations are simply made up by Western media to malign Chinese government that's all. Also, you didn't mention anything about Japanese doctoring their historical textbooks to omit WW2 atrocities. Like I said, what if Germany were allowed to edit its history to downplay Nazi atrocities? In Germany it is illegal NOT to mention Hitler or to downplay Nazi crimes, so why is Japan allowed to get away with it? Don't you see the double standards you apply to Japan and German, regarding their war crimes? Althought the atrocities lie with the older Japanese generation, the younger generation of Chinese are the ones publishing such historically inaccurate textbooks downplaying Japan's role in WW2 and are being allowed to get away with it. Japanese history textbook controversies en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_history_textbook_controversies So why do you continue to trivialize this affair? The younger generation of Japanese are not atoning for their ancestors sins, by doctoring their historical textbooks, and continuing to pray at Yasukuni shrine.
    1
  25905. Why are people constantly shielding the Japanese and cooking up excuses for their war crimes (real atrocities that actually happened) ? Just because you don't care, means you can tell others not to? China and South Korea both suffered for at least a decade under Japanese occupation (13 years for China, 35 years for Korea) You claim "The rest of the world, including Korea, has gotten past the anger and hatred." then I already shown videos of South Koreans protesting Yasukuni Shrine visit by Japanese politician, as well as elderly S. Korean women protesting against Japanese mislabeling "comfort" women as well paid prostitutes. All of this from Korean news not just China's CCTV, so how is this Chinese propaganda? The Tsunami that hit Japan was an act of nature, and not of China's doing. If other people claim that it is act of retribution by god, then why is it considered bigotry? "Retribution" and "Karma" are words that imply that the country did something wrong in the past (the Japanese war atrocities) and is now being punished for it. So why is it bigotry to consider the tsunami an act of punishment for previous grievances? Those atrocities really did happen, so what's wrong with people seeing the tsunami as repaying past crimes? Don't you people truly understand concept of "karma" before calling others bigots? I don't understand why you people continue to call the Yasukuni war shrine visit "petty" and refuse to make comparisons to Germany if they somehow choose to make a shrine to worship Hitler and Nazi. You don't care, gives you the right to tell others not to care? WW2 to many countries, was only 3-6 years (even for Nazism), whereas Japanese occupied China and Korea for more than 10 years, so obviously the circumstances for our countries are different as compared to rest of the world. Who are you people to tell us not to care, when your countries suffered for shorter duration, even for Nazism? No one has even said anything so far about Japanese revision of its historical textbooks. You claim the young Japanese people know their history, then what about those young Japanese that grew up learning from those revised Japanese historical textbooks? You claim young generation of Japanese are not to blame, then why are those historical textbooks being doctored and published by Japanese then? Would you people protest a German historical textbook downplaying Hitler and Nazism? It is already illegal in Germany NOT to mention its war crimes, so again, why are you people constantly making up excuses to defend Japan doctoring its textbooks? If you Filipinos (and your grandparents) don't care about Yasukuni, then do I blame you for not caring? And does this give you people the right to tell Chinese and Japanese not to care? Filipino people still protest to Japanese Embassy about "comfort" women issue just like South Koreans (as shown in one of my previous source), so if you personally don't care as Filipino, does that mean that other Filipinos don't care? Regarding Yasukuni's history, Chinese people didn't care about previous visits to Yasukuni by its politicians for a long time. But it is only after enshrinement of 14 Class-A Japanese war-criminals, did Chinese people began protesting. Chinese people don't mind Yasukuni enshrinement of Japanese war veterans (or even the Chinreisha building honoring those that died in WW2) since those soldiers that died were following orders from above. But it is the Class-A war criminals enshrinement, that Japanese government (i.e. the "younger" generation of Japanese) has probably gone too far here. Not just Chinese and Koreans protest, but also Emperor Hirohito expressed strong displeasure in 1988 over Yasukuni Shrine’s decision in the late 1970s to include Class-A war criminals on the list of people honored there, as shown in this Japanese source. Hirohito visits to Yasukuni stopped over war criminals japantimes.co.jp/news/2006/07/21/news/hirohito-visits-to-yasukuni-stopped-over-war-criminals/ So why can't Chinese and Koreans protest Yasukuni after enshrinement of Class-A Japanese war criminals? What is fundamentally wrong with us protesting? You people keep saying we should live and let live, as long as such further atrocities are prevented from happening in future. But how are we doing that, if we let Japan enshrine its high-level war criminals to worship them? The message it is sending to young Japanese people is "If you commit high level atrocities in name of Japan, you will be enshrined here and worshipped by leaders of Japan". *How are we going to prevent new generation of Japanese from repeating their war crimes, if we allow them to doctor their textbooks to downplay its atrocities? We all don't want Japan to repeat their war crimes, but how can we prevent that, if we allow Japanese to doctor their textbooks and enshrine high-level war criminals? As for Chinese government, you complain about Chinese government demolishing Larung Gar of Tibet and displace 5000 Tibetans, then I have already shown that Larung Gar is fire hazard, with numerous old wooden shacks packed closely together with low hanging electrical cables above its tin roofs. I even shown that there was fire in Larung Gar in 2014, so what's wrong with demolishing Larung Gar's old buildings to make way for modern buildings? This is 21st century, so shouldn't Tibetan students get access to more modern buildings, instead of being packed by the thousands into these unsafe accommodations? The CTA is sponsored by CIA, so how can you trust what it says when it has support from USA, whom is out to malign Chinese government in every way? Its sources just claim a Taoist Monk, an Uighur farmer, etc, etc, without actually naming the people, so why do you still believe what CTA says? On the other hand, I quoted some names of international organ experts from WHO and other organizations, that visited Beijing and denounce rumors of Falun Gong organ harvesting, so why dismiss my source and continue supporting yours? If you claim to have evidence, why not confront Chinese government directly with your proof? I mean, exactly what atrocities are Chinese government committing on minorities that you keep highlighting about? I have Tibetan and Uighur schoolmates, and although I am not personally close to them, they get along fine with other Han Chinese people and thanks to the government, these people are able to acquire an education and graduate to find jobs. Tibetans and Uighurs, being ethnic minorities in China, enjoy special privileges in education, such as having free education up to university/college and given advantage during entry into educational courses. If Chinese government are against minorities like you claim, then why grant Tibetans and Uighurs special privileges such as tax exemption, healthcare benefits and so on? Why spend money to demolish Larung Gar in Tibet to build modern campus, instead of leaving the old place as fire hazard to "kill" off Tibetans? Before 1951, Tibet had zero universities/colleges, but today, many Tibetan universities been build to help increase education level of Tibetans. List of universities and colleges in Tibet en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet You people don't know ANYTHING about China, yet presume to act like you do and claim Chinese media is censored from the truth, when most of you people never even been to China in the first place.
    1
  25906. +Kenuik nono I agree. Even the Chinese Civil War between KMT and the communist began, because Jiang Jieshi of KMT massacred thousands of communists in White Terror (Shanghai Massacre) in August 1927. If you blame mainland China's aggression against Taiwan (KMT), its because they started the Chinese civil war in the first place, by massacring communists by the thousands.
    1
  25907. +Captain Midnight This is what I don't understand: You are American, but why are you sticking up for Japanese war crimes instead of defending your country? Its extremely unnatural. Just because you don't defend your country from criticism, means I can't defend mine? People like you elevate Japanese people to be above all forms of criticism and constantly worship them on a pedestal. In your definition of bigot, you think Chinese people just simply started hating Japanese for no reason? Japan is the country that earned animosity in Asia in the first place, by invading China and Korea, and visiting many wartime atrocities onto our countries. So why is harboring hatred against Japanese people considered bigotry? Chinese and Koreans hate Japanese for their "actions" and it is these "actions" that earned them hatred, so how is it even related to "race"? If it were another race that committed those atrocities, the victims may still harbor hatred, regardless if the aggressor is Japanese or if the victims are Chinese. "Race" has little to do here with your definition of bigotry, and it is the "actions" that define this hatred in the first place. As for "karma", it is obvious that someone raised in America like you, would understand little of this Asian concept. "Karma" basically means bad things happen to people who do bad deeds. This divine punishment does not necessarily have to apply to you directly, and instead it can be inflicted on your family, your spouse, your kids, your grandchildren and even your village and country. And the punishment need not arrive immediately, it can occur be several decades later, which is part of the belief in karma. So how is claiming that the tsunami that hit Japan is an act of punishment by god, wrong in any way? China did not create that tsunami, and neither did you or me or that guy that first said it. So why are we being labelled as bigots, simply because American like you don't understand the Asian concept of karma? Who are you to "judge" whether a fate is well-deserved or not? You think you are some higher being that is granted the power to judge other people's crimes? Who do you think you are here to call something as not well deserved in the first place? Once again, your link of "bigotry" to "tsunami being a punishment by god for past sins" is weak and illogical. Just because Asians have our own beliefs, means you can constantly discount them as petty and trivialize the matter? Just because you don't care (even about your own government) means you can tell others not to care? I already shown that the Emperor Hirohito is old generation, while the Japanese politicians (like Shinzo Abe) that visit Yasukuni are the younger generation, so again, why are you cooking up excuses to defend the younger generation of Japanese? You claim Japanese have been punished for their crimes, then why is Hirohito (who is Japanese version of "Hitler") not in jail or even executed for orchestrating the entire affair of Japanese Imperialism? From what I heard, at the end of WW2, Hitler escaped punishment by committing suicide in his bunker, whereas the Japanese emperor got away lightly. Don't you see the level of unfairness between German and Japanese treatment after WW2? In my article about Unit 731, people did not know about the horrible experiments committed by Japanese soldiers, because General Douglas MacArthur secretly granted immunity to the physicians of Unit 731, in exchange for providing America with the data of their experiments. But again, you as American is probably going to say something along the lines of "I don't care about America's sins, both past and present" If new generation of Japanese do not support Japanese revised textbooks, then why is there no outright ban on the textbooks? They may be shunned, but not by every Japanese, and there are still schools teaching using those textbooks. What's going to happen to the next generations of Japanese children brought up by the teachings of this textbook? Why is this book even still partially tolerated by Japan in the first place, when such a book would have been immediately banned in Germany, if the subject was about downplaying Nazi warcrimes instead? Atrocities committed against OWN people are vastly different from atrocities committed against OTHER people. It is Koreans who should be concerned about North Korean atrocities, not China, since China does not meddle in North Korea's internal affair. As for Chinese atrocities, the communist party has long since acknowledged the failures of Mao's policies and moved on. Mao's Cultural Revolution had affected Tibet adversely, but also the rest of China suffered as well, and after the revolution, the CPC sent workers to Tibet to help rebuild the destroyed monasteries and temples as well as to help develop Tibetan region. They can't resurrect lost lives, but they can work to make living conditions in our country better. You constantly talk of Chinese government's atrocities, but again no new government is perfect in its rulership, and mistakes are bound to be made during the course of governing a country and the important thing was that the communist party realized their mistakes and abandon their current course to switch to Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms in 1970s. According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5 % in 1982 to 96.4 % in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39 %. Under the communist government, China's population doubled and our population life expectancy doubled, despite being as poor as India's in 1960s. So the good thing is that while the communist was on the wrong path initially, it was able to notice it and make changes accordingly. Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm Poverty in China en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China So what is wrong with giving Chinese government credit, where credit is due? I have never claimed that Chinese government is absolutely perfect (as I reiterated many times) but why can't I defend it when false allegations are made against it? You talk of ethnic minority discrimination, then why are ethnic minorities allowed to have as many kids as they want, whereas Han Chinese subject to population control measures? You mention Falun Gong, but I have already quoted international organ experts from WHO after their visit to Beijing. If you want, here is another article about organ transplant in China, this time with remarks made by Campbell Fraser, an organ trafficking researcher from Australia. He says rumors are still being spread by the Falun Gong cult as well as that China harvested organs from cult members, but "there's no evidence of that whatsoever". "So now this is like a proxy for a political campaign against the Chinese government. The people of the Falun Gong have no interest in transplantations, or in helping the patients. What they are interested in doing is trying to win global support for their campaign against China," he said. Fraser has followed global trends in organ trafficking for years and interviewed countless medical doctors, experts and Falun Gong practitioners. World can benefit from China's expertise in organ donation, Australian expert says chinadaily.com.cn/china/2017-04/22/content_29037519.htm You don't care about so many things, like what happens in your own country, but you somehow care for Japanese war crimes enough to jump to their defense? You constantly label our Asian issues "petty" when civilians are being bombed in Middle East and you don't care? Once again, just because you don't care about making your own country better, doesn't mean other people shouldn't care about making our countries better. Only childish people like you, resort to hurling abusive language when you lack any coherent point to bring up during this discussion.
    1
  25908. +Captain Midnight You claim to care about your country's issues and to be doing something about it. But exactly what are you doing about it? Your entire post is about defending Japanese war crimes and cooking up lame excuses, and there is hardly anything about defending America at all. Like I said, its unnatural the way you rush to defend Japanese warcrimes, all the while ignoring your own country's problems. Yet you claim to care about your country? Once again, you give the same old stale excuse about old generation and new generation. Take USA for example. The United States was formed on the backs of African slavery, genocide of native Americans, occupation of their lands, and plundering of their natural resources, like gold. Your country was built by laborious efforts of people, like Africans, and also Chinese immigrants to USA, who help build railroads and bridges in America, but the "white" Americans treated the other races like 2nd class citizens, when they are all immigrants to America (except for Native Americans). Racism and minority discrimination still exists in America, and you still complain about minority issues in China? How can you claim to know that these academia on Quora are all authentic Japanese? In Quora, people can easily pose as other races in their posts. Like you said, this is the Internet after all. You may have claimed to have talked to these people personally, but why would they share their intimate country's details about WW2 and innermost nationalist feelings, with a foreigner like you? Japanese well-known for being polite and reserved, so how would you know what they really think, unless you are Japanese-born yourself? For example, do you think such polite and courteous people are capable of such weird game shows, bizarre adult videos and such wicked war atrocities? You are completely fooled by their outward facade and politeness, and know nothing about their innermost thoughts. Again, why do you continue to call Yasukuni shrine visit "petty"? Would you treat a German Chancellor visiting a hypothetical Nazi shrine honoring Class-A criminals as petty? You are obviously trivializing the entire affair and dismissing it, when this issue continues to define relations between China-Japan and Korea-Japan. Look at Wikipedia: China–Japan relations en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China–Japan_relations and you can clearly see that the relationship between China and Japan has been strained at times by Japan's refusal to acknowledge its wartime past. Revisionist comments made by prominent Japanese officials and some Japanese history textbooks regarding the 1937 Nanjing Massacre have been a focus of particular controversy. This is unrelated but for completeness sake: According to Wikipedia: Japan–Korea relations, the relationship soured when the Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi visited the Yasukuni Shrine every year during his term. So from the above two paragraphs, why do you claim it is petty affair, when the Yasukuni visits defines the China-Japan and Japan-Korea relations? Such important issue affects our countries' relations, yet you continue to label it "petty"? I already shown many times that Hirohito is the OLD generation, and the younger Japanese politicians are the NEW generations continuing to worship at the shrines, but you blindly refuse to see this. If the young generation didn't visit Yasukuni, then there wouldn't even be any controversy between the generations at all, isn't there? Why do you refuse to see this? The general Japanese people may not believe in the revised textbook, but again, the books are NOT completely banned in Japan, and there will be inevitably be some schools teaching young generation of Japanese using those doctored materials. Otherwise, why not ban the book if everyone disapproves of it? Why is it still allowed to exist? Is it some because of some lingering Japanese reluctance to destroy the book? Once again, I don't understand why American like you continue to jump to Japan's defense every time. About bigotry, what is factually wrong with any of my previous descriptions about Japanese that makes it illogical and irrational? I quoted the Unit 731 atrocities from Wikipedia, so what is factually wrong with my description at all? It is all from Wikipedia, not narrated by Chinese government, so why are you constantly attributing every thing I say to the Chinese government? Those names of international organ experts from WHO and Australia, are they from Chinese government? You are just being extremely prejudice against me and my sources, when you are unable to even prove anything factually wrong with them. Look at Larung Gar being demolished because it consists of very closely packed old wooden houses, filled by 5000+ Tibetans students. Isn't it a real fire hazard, since a fire broke out in Larung Gar back in 2014? This is 2014, so why are Tibetan students still forced to live in such cramp and poor conditions? Which part of this statement is illogical and irrational at all? About bigotry again, if it has nothing to do with race, then why did you bring race into it? You claim I am being bigot for hating Japanese, but what is the source of this hatred? From the Japanese war crimes, which are still not fully addressed even till today, so what's wrong with harboring hatred here? It deals with the "actions" of Japanese, not their "race" so why is it bigotry. If those "actions" had never been committed, or if Japanese fully acknowledge their "actions" then this hatred wouldn't even exist at all, wouldn't you agree? Which part of this argument is illogical or irrational? This hatred didn't just rose out of nowhere. Many people in the world also hate a group of people roughly called "terrorists" so is this considered bigotry as well, according to your definition of hating a group of people? If you had truly known all about karma, then I wouldn't even have to explain its principles to you. You would have known that it affects generations, so why are you labeling me a bigot again? You personally don't believe in it but in Asian countries, belief in karma is prominent and one's actions can affect not just yourself, but your family, etc, etc. This is one of fundamental difference between Westerners beliefs and Asians beliefs. Of course there's no link between the WW2 and the tsunami, (since one is premeditated attack and one is act of nature) so what is wrong with claiming that the Tsunami was divine punishment from above? For the umpteen time, China did not cause the tsunami, neither did you or me or that guy, so how is this bigotry? No one can control when Tsunami will strike. You really feel sympathy for Japanese people killed by natural disaster, but feel nothing for Chinese killed, raped and experimented on by Japanese? I have never claimed to have judge whether the tsunami is well-deserved fate. All I said that it was an act of nature (which you refuse to even acknowledge) and if anyone was "judging" then it was Heaven's will. If you somehow think that that fate was not well-deserved, then why don't you blame the heavens above, instead of Chinese people by labeling us bigots? You clearly harbor extreme prejudice by blaming Chinese people for something we didn't do, yet defending Japanese for something they did on Chinese. Hitler knew he would be executed as Westerners are going to demand his blood, which was why he committed suicide. But Hirohito was promised US protection from retaliation by Japan's victims like Chinese, Koreans and allowed to keep his life. Why did USA resort to protecting the aggressor country of WW2 instead of helping victims seek justice? Just like why Unit 731 was covered up by General MacArthur and the Japanese scientists granted immunity? You claim to be defending USA, but what exactly have you done to defend your country at all in your entire post? All you keep doing is sticking up for Japan every time, instead of USA. Crimes against humanity? Isn't USA also bombing other countries and violating human rights in Guantanamo Bay detention center? What about you constantly being apologist for Japanese war crimes in all of your posts? China is member of UN, but our dealings with North Korea are also on a bilateral (country to country) level which are different from UN's third party interference. If you don't trust my sources, then what reason do I have to trust your sources? For example, CTA is being openly sponsored by CIA, so what makes its source reliable when it says a Taoist monk, or a Uighur farmer, dozens of Christians, etc, without giving any actual information. About your source, I already shown that Falun Gong is a cult, so what is wrong if Chinese government uses our media to expose its crimes? Doesn't the USA also use their media to expose terrorism within their countries? You constantly label Chinese people as bigots for targeting a group of people, when USA also does that by targeting "terrorists" as a threat to national security in the same way? You have shown extreme disinterest in anything regarding America, but conversely, you are passionate about Japan and pour so much effort into jumping in to defend Japanese war crimes. Are you really American-Filipino? Why you claim to care about your country's problems, but said nothing about America, and go into extreme detail about Japan instead? Isn't this unnatural, the way you stick up for Japan, but not America? Why is it you are allowed to defend Japan instead of America, but I can't even defend China? I openly said Chinese government is not perfect, and they have their flaws, but thanks to our government, China is not a puppet of USA, like South Korea or Japan or even ROC (Taiwan) and Philippines to lesser extent. Chinese government fights for our own interests, not for that of USA, unlike those other countries I mentioned above. China relies on PLA for defense, not US forces like in S. Korea, Japan or Philippines.
    1
  25909. +Chappie99 9 Where your evidence that organ harvesting is still ongoing today? I already shown that international organ experts from WHO and Australia have been to Beijing to observe our organ transplant practices and have already dispelled rumors of ongoing organ harvesting. For example, Falun Gong claims 100,000 organ transplants are occurring every year in China. But according to statistics, the total number of organ transplants in the world in 2015 was 126,670. So how could Chinese government have performed almost as many organ transplants as the rest of the world put together? Source: Estimated number of organ transplantations worldwide in 2015 statista.com/statistics/398645/global-estimation-of-organ-transplantations/ +Captain Midnight If you claim nobody defending Japanese war crimes, then exactly what is this argument all about? If you aren't defending Japanese war crimes, then we wouldn't be having this discussion at all, so why continue to stick up for them, while not claiming to do so? You obviously stick up for them, instead of your own country. Look at the amount of content you posted related to Japan, compared to America. Yet you claim you aren't defending Japan, and that you care for America? I don't know your exact ancestry, but it is possible that you are half-Caucasian, half-Filipino. So obviously you won't hate Caucasian Americans (white), but can you say the same thing for full blooded African Americans (black), Latin Americans (brown), Asian Americans (yellow) and of course Native Americans (red)? Once again, you don't even defend America, but claim to address these minority ethnic problems? In Youtube, Japanese hosts interview Japanese citizens on TV, but again, who would express their own private opinions to the public media, especially about sensitive issues like Yasukuni and Japanese warcrimes? You really simply believe what these Japanese uploaders choose to show on Youtube? In many of such interviews, the more extremist and radical views expressed of people interviewed are omitted and not shown. As for Quora, the only information gleamed about the users are that Akinari Kumazawa is half-Japanese and he clearly refers to himself as regular "Jap" (which is actually an ethnic slur against Japanese) so it is clear that he doesn't even respect his own origins. And Hiro Kuwana, it's only known that he is Buddhist, so how can you prove he is really Japanese? I have already shown how such a "petty" affair can strain the relations between Japan-China and also Japan-Korea. I don't understand why you continue to trivialize such important affair that affects our 3 countries' relations. China and Korea aren't the ones who started the whole thing; Japan did, both by waging war and then continuing to enshrine Class-A war criminals, so how is it our countries are being petty for protesting? The revised textbooks are still not completely banned in Japan, so why is my fault for point that out? Some schools will still pick up those books and teach it to next generation of Japanese, and these kids will grow up thinking Japan did nothing wrong during WW2. So why are you blaming me, instead of the Japanese? Do you want Japanese children to be taught using these doctored teaching materials? In those textbooks, South Korean "comfort" women are referred to as willing well-paid government prostitutes, so why do you think those elderly Koreans are protesting? They will most likely not receive justice and die being remembered wrongly, so why do you continue to stick up for Japan? Why don't you spend time proving how my statements illogical and irrational instead of resorting to insulting me? The textbook revision and Yasukuni visit already show that young generation of Japanese do not fully acknowledge war crimes of their ancestors. I mean, if the current Japanese gov't simply rectified these two issues, then China and Korea would be lesser inclined to protest, isn't it? Old generation like Hirohito clearly knows what his generation did, so why younger generation continue to defend older generation's crimes? Nobody would find fault with current Japanese generation, if they choose to directly address these two issues. You keep saying everything is Chinese propaganda, while I simply shown that Unit 731 is by Western media, so why call me a "tw@t"? Do I call you that? If its not about race, then why bring race into this issue? I have never once leveled anything racist towards Japanese or blamed them because of their race. I pointed out Japanese "actions" not their "race" so how am I being racist at all? What about you people claiming Chinese people are all rude and noisy? Isn't that racist against Chinese? So its rational to "hate" terrorists, but "irrational" to hate Japanese people who defend their warcrimes? Who are you to define what is "hating the right people"? You only see from your own point of view and not others, so how do you define "hating the right people"? You're not even Japanese, so why are you constantly sticking up for them? The Yasukuni shrine visit is political affair between China, Korea and Japan, so why are you as American even butting in? You claim I am not involved, then what is your association to Japan-Chinese relations at all? Just like here, you are claiming I am bigot for believing in Karma. Millions of people in the world believe in karma, so if you don't, then what gives you the right to tell others not to believe? Karma affects people over generations so what is bigoted with our beliefs that you must insult us so? You are half-Asian by ancestry, but it is clear you are full-American in your beliefs. Who are you to mock Asian beliefs of what happens to souls then? My statement makes sense when strung together, but you are deliberately dissecting it so it doesn't make sense when taken apart. Of course there's no link between WW2 and the tsunami, (since one is man-made and the other is natural) so what is wrong with claiming that the Tsunami was divine punishment from above? Did I ever said the two affairs are not linked spiritually? No, I only said one is done by man and other by nature, so obviously they aren't linked in that regard. If China had invaded Japan, then both of them would be man-made affairs, but since tsunami is act of nature, then whats wrong claiming it to be divine punishment from above? Get over it? Who is the one complaining about tsunami victims in the first place? You weep for Japanese being killed by act of nature, but not for Chinese people killed, raped and experimented on by Japanese? One affair could have been prevented while the other was entirely unpreventable, so why are you blaming Chinese and calling us bigots for what happened to Japan? Did China invade Japan or somehow created the tsunami? You don't believe in "guy in the sky" means others have to follow your beliefs? You have entirely failed to show how I am bigoted in any way. I am not racist, and I blame Japanese "actions" not their "race", unlike some of you people stereotyping all Chinese as rude and noisy. I don't mock or insult your beliefs unlike what you keep doing to me. Karma dictates that bad things happen to bad people, over generations, so the tsunami can be viewed as divine punishment by some people. So you call them bigots for their beliefs? Who is the one first mention bigotry in the first place? Excuse me but I never said Hitler was killed by the Allies, only that he knew he would if he was captured alive. Also, how was Hirohito tried in place of his subordinates? During Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal in 1946, many Japanese military and political leaders were tried and executed, but Emperor Hirohito and all members of the imperial family, such as career officer Prince Yasuhiko Asaka, were not prosecuted, so how was Hirohito tried in place of his subordinates at all? What about General MacArthur covering up Unit 731 atrocities? Its alright if you claim US government is corrupt, but when have I ever said that Chinese government is absolutely perfect? Chinese government has corruption, but at least the communist party is taking active steps to crack down on corruption and there are many news of communist party leader exposed for corruption. But when is the last time USA conducted anti-corruption campaign? For example, as a candidate, President Trump promised to release his tax details if he became president, but so far, he hasn't done so. And you people just continue to support him not knowing whether he is clean? Lastly, if you people still believe in Falun Gong organ-harvesting, then why doesn't anyone approach Chinese government with solid proof to expose this matter once and for all? Why doesn't US President Trump confront President Xi directly about Falun Gong organ harvesting? Why didn't Obama administration expose this issue during Obama's term? Do other UN world leaders like Russian President Vladimir Putin or German Chancellor Angela Merkel raise the issue of Falun Gong to President Xi? You people claim to have all these incriminating evidence available, then why don't you take the Chinese government to court over this issue? Even right now, UN human rights focus is on Rohigya crisis happening in Burma, so what makes Falun Gong an issue when no government is willing to take charge of this issue? What use is all your allegations, when you can't even use them to prove anything? I have already shown organ experts from WHO, Chicago and Australia have been to Beijing and dispelled such rumors, and even quoted their names directly. These people are willing risk their international reputation to refute Falun Gong harvesting rumors. In 2015, the total number of organ transplants in 2015 was 126,670, so how can China be performing over 100,000 organ transplants every year, as claimed by Falun Gong? In China, the waiting time for organ transplants in our hospitals is in months, the same as anywhere else.
    1
  25910. +Captain Midnight My bigoted statements? Who is the one resorting to abusive language, such as "tw@t" and "go F yourself" to attack me personally? I don't use such language against you, simply because your views differ from mine. Just like why is it your observations about Chinese being obnoxious and bigoted is not racist, but I am racist towards Japanese? Can you quote me the statements I made about Japanese is even remotely racist at all? I blame their "actions" not "race" so why you think I am racist, when you clearly are racist yourself? I have already shown that one of the "Japanese" in Quora is actually half-Japanese, and he uses "Jap" (which is ethnic slur) to refer to his race, so how does his view represent that of all Japanese? You ask me to prove their identity, then what about you claiming that the Japanese criminals who are involved in the unit 731 attrocities did express their opinions to the public media? The Japanese burnt and destroyed most of the materials regarding Unit 731, as shown in my Unit 731 source, so why do you still claim the Japanese involved in Unit 731 are "expressing their views to public media" when tragically, many more horror stories are buried? Why do you still stubbornly defend the Unit 731 Japanese? About Japanese books being banned, you clearly said "Do you seriously lack the mental capacity...etc" so aren't you faulting me for pointing out that the revised books are not banned in Japan? Why does the Japanese public tolerate the presence of these revised textbooks? These books will inevitably end up being taught in some Japanese schools and the next generation Japanese schoolkids will grow up ignorant of Japan's crimes during WW2. Why do you continue to attack me personally, while sticking up for the Japanese? We all don't want Japan repeat its war crimes, but how can we do that, when they have textbooks that downplay their crimes? I think it is you who lack the mental capacity to think about the consequences of tolerating such revised books. I have already shown that it is YOUNG generation of Japanese that are visiting Yasukuni Shrine, and publishing those textbooks, not the OLD generation. Old generation like Hirohito is against the Younger Japanese politicians visiting of Yasukuni after enshrinement of Class-A warcriminals, so why can't I blame the younger generation? How is this statement illogical and irrational? You rather prefer to spend your time attacking me personally with insults, instead of actually addressing any of my points. About Yasukuni Shrine visit and Revised textbook, if you read my source about Japan-China relations, then Sino-Japanese relations warmed considerably after Shinzo Abe became the PM of Japan in 2006, and joint historical study between China and Japan in 2010 pointed toward new consensus on WW2 atrocities. [1] foreignpolicy.com/2010/02/09/nanjing-by-the-numbers/ so why you claim China would protest no matter what the Japanese people do? Chinese people didn't protest Yasukuni Shrine visits PRIOR to the enshrinement of 14 Class-A Japanese war criminals so why you think China would continue to protest, even if Japan rectified this situation? Just because you accept Japan's official position, means China and Korea are wrong for not accepting, and we are giving malice to the visits? Who is the one that maliciously choose to enshrine Class-A war criminals in the first place? Why do you continue to defend Japan, and accept their statements, while labeling China and Korea malicious? Our countries are victims of the war, not Japan, which you keep shielding. If Japan have the right to do that in their own country, then why are you constantly bringing up Tibet and Falun Gong in our country? In Larung Gar, 10,000+ Tibetans live in those packed, old wooden houses, so what's wrong with China reducing the numbers by half in Larung Gar to 5,000 and also demolishing the buildings to make way for modern apartments? There was a fire in Larung Gar in 2014, so why can't Chinese government take steps to prevent another fire from happening? Visiting a shrine doesn't mean they are denying their warcrimes, but enshrining Class A Japanese warcriminals is. The message this is sending to younger generations of Japanese is that "Commit these atrocities in Japan's name, and when you die, your remains will be enshrined in Yasukuni and worshiped by future Japanese politicians." Which part of this interpretation is wrong? You think Chinese and Koreans are protesting against Yasukuni without any reason? Your point of view is logic? Then why do you cuss and swear at me constantly for expressing my views, because mine differ from yours? You tell me to "Learn to Context" when you dissect every line of my paragraph so that each line is meaningless on its own, and then proceed to attack me personally? You know the principles of Karma, and that it affects future generations so why are you labeling us "bigots" for believing in it? You said: "Are worms the souls of your ancestors" already shows your contempt so who are you to blame others for their beliefs? *You shield Japanese belief in Yasukuni, while despising millions in the world who believe in karma. Where is the logic here? My statements make sense when strung together, so you dissect them until nobody can understand what each line means on its own. Why are we suddenly talking about treatment of black people in China and Japan? If you Japan isn't racist, then you are looking at wrong the demographic. According to the following source, Japan is very well developed first world country today, but the fact remains it still suffers from xenophobia. Although according to Japanese laws, racism and discrimination are not allowed, the government still practices what is called “positive discrimination”. It has very low tolerance for refugees and people from other countries and it is also known fact that Japan tries its best to not allow entry to Muslims in their country as they think that Islam is not compatible with their culture. Such blatant cases of discrimination are prevalent in the country and nothing is being done about it. Top 12 Most Racist Countries in the World (6th is Japan) listovative.com/top-12-most-racist-countries-in-the-world/ About Hitler, you clearly said: "America wanted to just hang the guy (Hirohito)" so why would they spare Hitler if you compare Hitler's treatment with Hirohito's? How does this analogy not work? So if Hirohito wasn't tried for his crimes, then how does his "plea" to protect his subordinates even work? MacArthur still charged and executed Hirohito's subordinates and spared the royal family, as well as the Unit 731 Japanese scientist? You can clearly see the difference for the victims of Japanese imperialism as compared to victims of Nazism with respect to the treatment of those responsible for WW2. Why then shouldn't Chinese and Koreans protest about this then? The anti-corruption campaign is not just President Xi Jinping's idea ALONE. Every communist party member has to agree to this campaign in order for it to be carried out. Like I said, the Chinese government is not perfect in its implementation of anti-corruption campaign, but at least there is something being done and corruption is being addressed. Trump didn't won the popularity vote? Then why is Trump the president of USA, if he is not the most popular? Clinton is corrupt I agree, so why isn't anything being done about her? Didn't Trump promise to jail Clinton? You mock our Chinese anti-corruption campaign, when USA does nothing about its own internal corruption? About Falun Gong evidence, those resolutions are only passed by USA alone, but not other world leaders like Russia's, Germany's, UK's, France's, etc. If USA has all the evidence, then why doesn't Trump make a fresh appeal to President Xi about Falun Gong then? It is obvious that USA lacks SOLID evidence to properly convict China in court, so how can you go on and on about Falun Gong? The total number of organ transplants IN THE ENTIRE WORLD in 2015 is only 126,670 according to statista.com/statistics/398645/global-estimation-of-organ-transplantations/ so how can you believe that there are over 100,000 transplants every year in China as claimed by Falun Gong? If those International organ experts from WHO, Chicago and Australia are refuted, then exactly who refuted them? According to economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2014/12/daily-chart-11 China has one of the lowest organ transplant rates in Asia, even lower than Japan or Singapore, and according to the Bar on China, majority of the organs come from deceased donors (dark blue) instead of living donors (light blue). So how can you claim China has 100,000 organ transplants happening secretly underground? Does China have more organ doctors than rest of the world put together to achieve a figure of 100,000? In China the waiting time for organ donation is as long as most other countries, so how does your Falun Gong organ harvest even hold credit at all, when exposed to these facts? Lastly, all you shown is that you harbor extreme prejudice against Chinese people that's all, while always sticking up for Japan, despite their warcrimes. Anyone can see that you are trying especially hard to defend Japanese atrocities, and that you don't really care about defending America (your country). Why do you care so much about Japan, or that Chinese consider the tsunami that hit Japan as punishment? You don't believe Karma, but you understand it, so what's wrong with millions who believe in karma? The tsunami happened regardless of people's beliefs. You clearly aren't Japanese, so there's nothing at stake if you don't defend them. The shrine and textbooks issues are clearly issues for Japan and China to work out ourselves, not for Americans like you, so cook up excuses for Japan every single time? Are Japanese somehow above all criticism?
    1
  25911. +Chappie99 9 According to your source, in 2005, China's transplant system was built on harvesting organs from criminals sentenced to death (“executed prisoners”) So isn't this similar as "capital punishment" as defined by other countries, such as the USA in which criminals can be given the death sentence? Every country define their capital punishment laws differently. Under Chinese laws, it was legal to harvest organs from death-row inmates, but prior consent had to be obtained from the inmate himself or his family members. The organs are were also given to the inmates families or relatives. Of course, they were also only taken after the donor was dead, not harvested "live", like Western propaganda always claim. This practice has only been banned since January 2015, so Chinese doctors performing 46 emergency liver transplants, between January 2000 and December 2004 were doing so before the ban was in place. Since when does Falun Gong do yoga? Yoga is Indian exercise not Chinese. Chinese exercise like Qigong have long established history of thousands of years prior to Falun Gong. Falun Gong was only created in 1992, by Li Hongzhi so it has less than 30 years of history, and it hijack existing practices like Qigong which been used in China for thousands of years. That should already sound off warning bells that this is cult in the making. This article culteducation.com/group/1254-falun-gong/6922-is-falun-gong-a-cult.html defines why Falun Gong is considered a cult. The leader, Li Hongzhi is extremely charismatic, and purportedly possesses "supernatural" powers and know "the top secret of the universe" and says "no religion can save people". His followers believe that Li Hongzhi always right and they are not allowed question the basic assumptions concerning his purported supernatural powers, teachings and/or opinions and he remains an absolute, authoritarian leader with little if any accountability. If you try to leave Falun Gong, Li Hongzhi's followers will brand you as "evil". He also encourages hatred of homosexuals, saying, "The disgusting homosexuality shows the dirty abnormal psychology of the gay who has lost his ability of reasoning at the present time," Li Hongzhi wrote in Volume II of "Zhuan Falun," or "Turning the Law Wheel," which was translated into English in 1996. In his talk in Switzerland, Li Hongzhi also stated that gay people would be "eliminated" by "the gods." Asked in Frankfurt, Germany, in 1998 whether gays could practice Falun Gong, Mr. Li answered, "You can cultivate, but you must give up the bad conduct." There are many more reasons listing why Falun Gong is a cult according to above source. Like I told Captain Midnight, if you believe that you have enough incriminating evidence of your own, then you are always welcome to expose this whole affair by taking China directly to court. Otherwise, there is insufficient proof to prove that Falun Gong organ harvesting is still continuing till today.
    1
  25912. +Chappie99 9 China defines deathrow prisoners under Chinese laws and consent is obtained from prisoners before harvesting. Internationals Ethical Guidelines regarding “voluntarily donated” are just that, guidelines like you said, not absolute laws. Ownby is merely stating his own opinon about Falun Gong not being a cult that's all. Also in your source, Heather Kavan, a researcher at Massey University in New Zealand, disagrees with Ownby and she argues that Falun Gong “could be described as a cult” drawing comparison between Falun Gong and Maoism, writing that “like Mao, Li has activated millions of people with his rhetoric. His ideology is similarly characterized by moral superiority, defining others as absolute evil, dehumanizing enemies by labeling them snake spirits and possessed by ghosts, extolling the virtues of selflessness and sacrifice, emphasizing the necessity of enduring physical hardship, harassing critics, and denigrating science in favor of his purportedly infallible truths.”
    1
  25913. +Captain Midnight You claim that you using abusive language is not bigotry, but somehow, me not retaliating with abusive language is? What sort of twisted logic is this? You're not a bigot, when you are deliberately being offensive? And I am a bigot when I don't stoop to the same low level as you? African Americans are not true Africans in the sense that grew up in Africa, like Nigerians, Somalians, Ethiopians, etc. No true born African would call themselves by the N-word, unlike those African Americans. So in the same way, isn't that half-Japanese who calls himself the ethnic slur "Jap" not a true born Japanese? What more solid proof do you need here? African Americans "aren't" true Africans and neither is that half-Japanese chap who refers to his people as "Jap", Also, Filipinos don't call themselves "Flip", they usually call themselves "Pinoy" so what nonsense are you cooking up here? Your first source does not even mention the Japanese guy who told the first story. Did he even get his due, for cutting open a naked 30-year-old prisoner tied to a bed and dissecting him alive, without anesthetic, to study what diseases does to a person? It says the research was covered up and US army granted immunity to those scientists from war crimes prosecution and instead putting the ringleaders on trial, it gave them stipends. So what punishment did this farmer receive? He is 72-year old, still alive and not being punished. A Russian mother and daughter were gassed to death, the mother vainly trying to cover her child and protect her from the gas. Two Chinese men were "surgical dummies" for Japanese doctors to perform an appendectomy, then an amputation of an arm and finally a tracheotomy, before being killed. Doctors even experimented on a three-day-old baby, with a needle stuck inside the infant's middle finger. Why do you continue defend such atrocities and stick up for them? Imagine if you are one of the prisoners undergoing such procedures. Your source doesn't even mention the testing of STDs and sexual crimes against female prisoners, such as impregnation and conducting experiments on mothers carrying babies. About Japanese revised books, you claim they are doing something about it, then exactly what are they doing? Why aren't the books banned and why are they allowed to exist? Their continued existence, means some Japanese schools are going to teach using those materials, and new generation of Japanese schoolkids will grow up learning the wrong history. Why can't I point this out for fear of future generations Japanese repeating their crimes in WW2? As for Chinese extending Japanese war to begin in 1931, the fact still remains that Japanese forces invaded Manchuria in 1931 and occupied our territories since then. So why can't this date 1931 be the actual starting point of the 2nd Sino-Japanese conflict? Japanese invaders were already occupying Chinese territory by time of Marco Polo incident in 1937. Why is this wrong? For example, WW2 formally began when Nazi Germany invaded Poland in 1939, so why can't Japan invade Manchuria be the starting point of Sino-Japanese conflict? China fought Japan long before Nazis even invaded Poland. About the shrine visits, how is such an event is not "petty" at all, when it affects the bilateral relations between Japan-China and also Japan-Korea as shown in my Sino-Japanese relations. Like I said, China and Korea didn't protest Japanese visiting Yasukuni PRIOR to enshrinement of the 14 Class-A Japanese war criminals. Do you even know who those Class-A criminals are, and what they did? They are the higher-ups responsible for crimes against humanity, like torture and rape that have nothing honorable about it, nor does it benefit the country. They are not the simple Japanese soldiers following orders, like Class-B and below. Why then do Japanese enshrine such high ranking officials in the first place to honor them? Isn't the message saying "Commit those crimes and you will be enshrined" being sent to young generation of Japanese through this actions? If Japan were truly sincere about apologizing for its crimes, why doesn't Japanese government simply remove those 14 Class-A criminal from Yasukuni to restore Sino-Japan relations prior to their enshrinement? Again, why are you willing to go so far to excuse the actions of these Japanese politicians? This affair mainly concerns China, Japan and Korea, so why are China and Korea wrong for protesting? So you excuse yourself cussing and swearing in your arguments? How is that being "logical" when you are resorting to verbally attacking me instead of attacking my points? You know that karma affects generations, so what's wrong with claiming the tsunami is divine punishment, according to principles of karma? If you don't despise others who believe in it, then why are you calling the people who believe in it "bigots"? I don't mock you for your beliefs, so why do you do that to us? I already shown that tsunami is act of nature, unlike Japanese invasion of China, so why are you blaming Chinese when we aren't responsible for the tsunami in the first place? Its an act of nature, and we can't attribute it to karma? Just look at the single lines that you kept on dissecting from my texts in your previous post. No one can understand the context of such lines when you dissect them, so isn't that the reason why you dissect them? They form a cohesive point when grouped together, but since you can't address them directly, you dissect them until they no longer make any sense. Why are we suddenly talking about "black" people at all? The Western countries are the ones famous for mistreating Africans by importing them as slave labor in 19th century, so how is China's treatment any worst as compared to that of what Westerners did to Africa? Chinese people don't lynch Africans unlike what you Americans did to Africans. In fact, the worst lynching in America happened in Chinatown against Chinese immigrants, so who are you Americans to even talk about racism here based on your history? The Largest Lynching In US History youtube.com/watch?v=UpZZf7K12pU If you discount my survey, then how is yours any better? In your source, Philippines is 20 - 39.9% intolerant and South Korea is even worst at 30 - 39.9% whereas China is only 15 - 19.9% intolerant so exactly how racist is China as compared to those countries? So because Americans didn't get to treat Hitler they way you want, gives you justice to protect Hirohito and his families and cover up Unit 731 crimes? You seen what horrors Japanese inflicted on Chinese, Russian and other prisoners in Unit 731, so why do you still fight to make excuses for Japan? Westerners hated Hitler, well then, Chinese and Koreans hated the Japanese responsible like Hirohito, so why was MacArthur allowed to cover up Unit 731 and protect Hirohito from retaliation by China and Korea? What if our roles were reversed and Chinese somehow prevented Westerners from exacting revenge on Hitler? Wouldn't you feel the same way in this analogy? The communist party only passes each new laws based on the approval of every communist official. If the "tigers" were powerful, they could have easily blocked the move and prevent the anti-corruption crackdown from occurring. So, why is Trump president if he didn't win the popularity vote? What's the whole point of popularity vote at all, when it doesn't determine who becomes the US president? You again insult me, while I don't do the same to you, and I only pointed out that China is actually doing "something" tangible about corruption, whereas USA isn't, so who is "butthurt" here? Which gov't gets stuff done? Your "International Response" covers mainly USA and Israel, but nothing from Russia, UK, France, Germany, etc, about their response. US and its allies response doesn't represent "international response" In the US, a Congressional Research Service report by Dr. Thomas Lum stated that the Kilgour–Matas report relied largely on logical inference, without bringing forth new or independently obtained testimony; the credibility of much of the key evidence was said to be questionable. Ethan Gutmann is the one who claimed not "10,000 transplants per year in China, but something more like 60,000 to 100,000 transplants a year." according to theepochtimes.com/interview-with-ethan-gutmann-co-author-of-new-china-organ-harvesting-report_2095465.html The whole world performed about 126,000 transplants in 2015, so how could China have doctors necessary for 100,000 transplants in a year? Lastly, if my criticism of Japan is unsound, then how is yours any more logical? You resort to abusive language and attacking me personally instead of my points, and you copy my text and dissect them so that each line makes no sense out of context, while providing little content of your own. Whereas I wrote my own opinions, instead of insulting you with vulgarities for your different opinion? Why can't I defend China, when you can stick up for Japanese warcrimes (as horrible as they are) and excuse Japanese politician actions? Karma affects next generations, so why is it bigoted to attack us for our beliefs? We didn't cause the tsunami, but Japan invaded China and refused to fully acknowledge its war atrocities as shown in Yasukuni shrine and those revised textbooks, which are the doing's of young generation of Japanese, not the old ones like Hirohito. Why Hirohito is allowed to escape punishment because America protected him? How would Americans feel if China had somehow protected Hitler if the roles were reversed? In conclusion, you only see things from your prejudiced point of view that's all and cuss and swear, while expecting to be respected and "logical".
    1
  25914. +Captain Midnight How are people going to make sense of my sentences when you simply just snip off lines and leave them exposed? The definition of bigotry also includes "Intolerance towards those who hold different opinions from oneself." so isn't that what you are doing when you constantly abuse me for having different view? Oxford dictionary: Bigotry en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/bigotry Since you claim I am racist, then why don't you quote my racist remarks made towards Japanese? I blame Japanese for their "actions" not their "race". What about you making remarks stereotyping Chinese being obnoxious and bigoted? Isn't that attacking people for their race, not their actions? The "hate" stems from Japanese invasion of our lands and refusal to fully acknowledge its war crimes, so why is this not justified? See, my whole point about African Americans is that they are AMERICANS, not AFRICANS and Americans use the N-word. So that half-Japanese who used ethnic slur "Jap" is not true Japanese, the same way African Americans aren't true Africans. This whole paragraph makes sense in context, but you constantly snip off lines until it makes no sense in your argument. In your "flip side story" there is no mention of Filipinos referring to themselves as "flip" The word is just used to mean the "good" side of story, but not referencing to their race. "Flipreads" can also mean turning through pages of a book, so it may not refer to the Filipino race. In the above two contexts, "flip" has more than one meaning so how would you know if they are directly referencing Filipino race, when its primary definition ("good side" and "turning pages") makes more sense in context? So you mean just because one anonymous Japanese man talked openly about his crimes, means whole Yasukuni Shrine and Revised Textbook is debunked? Who is this Japanese man and what is his name? Is he being punished or is he walking free? You claim Japanese speak openly about this, when we don't even know this person's name? What about the people responsible for Unit 731 (Class-A war criminals) being enshrined and worshiped at Yasukuni? Why don't you ask how those Japanese rapists if they would openly talk about the women prisoners they raped and impregnated, and then dissecting the pregnant mothers and performing sick experiments on children they fathered with them? Why do you continue to stick up for these people? No non-Japanese would try so hard and go so far to make up excuses for Japanese war crimes. If you weren't defending them, then obviously we wouldn't be having this argument. It goes without saying that the revised textbooks still not banned, and probably in circulation, despite what you keep claiming. Your source also shows that no real analysis been done on people who have exploited the textbook issue with the aim of reinforcing their political and cultural dominance over contemporary Japan. The leaders and members of the Liberal Democratic Party and bureaucrats in the Ministry of Education continue to prevent the book from being banned, and because of this, some Japanese schools may use such books in their teaching materials for the younger generation of Japanese. How is this lying? The books still exist, meaning that some Japanese schools will inevitably teach it to Japanese children. Excuse me but you are the one brought up issue of Chinese history, and now accuse me of moving the goalpost? Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931, just like Nazi Germany invaded Poland in 1939 at start of WW2, so shouldn't Sino-Japanese war begin in 1931 then, when the invaders first landed on our shores? The interpretation is not just my own views. They are also shared by some Chinese and Koreans as well as our respective government so how is it a "petty" issue, when it has adversely affected Japan-China relations and Japan-Korea relations? A trivial issue wouldn't have such impact on countries relations as Japanese politician visits to Yasukuni. You failed to show how is it "petty" it is when it concerns our nations relations and you continue to defend Japanese actions by claiming removal of the enshrined names is irreversible. About tsunami and WW2 not being linked. I said they aren't linked because one is man-made and the other isn't. But you keep dissecting my sentences until the original meaning is lost altogether. If you really believe the tsunami and WW2 not spiritually linked then its your own belief. But can you stop others from believing the Tsunami was act of punishment for Japanese warcrimes? In karma, bad things happen to bad people, sometimes over generations, and we use it to tell our children not to commit bad crimes, else they will end up an insect or even deformed like that example you keep on mentioning. Don't Christians also believe in "Judgement Day" where everyone will be judged according to their crimes? Its the same thing with Karma, except we can physically observe the phenomena such as deformity or natural disasters. So what's wrong with people who believe the tsunami is punishment for Japanese warcrimes? It is interpreted as message from above reminding everyone not to commit bad deeds. Who are you to call us bigots for believing in this, when millions of people in world believe in karma? Why bring up that "sh!tty" survey if your not going to use it? And you claim I move the goalpost again, when you brought up that survey? About Hitler and Hirohito, the fact remains that one committed suicide, while the other eluded punishment because of America. So why did US protect the aggressor nation of WW2 from retaliation by its victims? If roles reverse, you won't care (since you don't care about anything at all) but Jews and victims of Hitler would protest the same way Chinese and Koreans are protesting now.. You mock our Chinese anti-corruption campaign design, when US system is designed such that unpopular leaders like Trump can become US President? Why don't you fix your countries problems instead of complaining about Chinese corruption? USA has long been suffering "political stagnation" so why can't Chinese government stir up and change our internal political climate? Even if Chinese government did kill people, there were results, such as lifting 600 million Chinese out of poverty according to World Bank. This is no easy feat. For comparison, African continent has about 1.2 billion people, so Chinese government lifted a number equal to half of Africa's entire population out of poverty, in decades as compared to what Westerners did in Africa for centuries. This phenomena has been named "unprecedented" in human history, even by Western scholars, and is said to be unlikely to be ever repeated again, even by other developing nations. Where does Gutmann even get his numbers to grossly exaggerate 10,000 transplants to 100,000 transplants? The entire world's total number of transplants only came up to about 126,000 in 2015, so China as single country is able to match that? Why you just believe whatever figure Gutmann proposed without applying logical thinking? Do our hospitals have enough organ surgeons for 100,000 transplants a year? If you think Westerners have enough solid evidence about Falun Gong organ harvesting, then like I said, you people are always welcome to take it up in court with Chinese government to present your proof. Otherwise, all your accusations remain as allegations, nothing more. Right now, the international community is mostly concerned with Rohigya crisis in Burma, so the Falun Gong issue is not near anyone's top priority at the moment. For the whole debate, you have been childishly resorting to hurling insults and vulgarities against me, so how does that make you any more believable? I believe no one on this entire thread is even Japanese, so why are you people jumping to defend them? Why non-Japanese like you fight so hard for Japanese war crimes? Its not your problem, its Japan, China and Korea bilateral issue, isn't? Look at the amount of effort you people put into making up excuses for Japanese warcrimes. Why go so far for them? They are not above criticism so why can't Chinese criticism them base on our history? To you, there's nothing wrong with Japanese worship at warshrine, but Chinese people can't believe the tsunami was an act of karma? Can't you see your unfair double standards applied to our countries? If you think tsunami not linked, then it is your belief, but does that mean you can stop Chinese and Koreans from our beliefs? Also, in your sources you have shown that Japanese government also censor its warcrimes such as the deathtoll for Rape of Nanjing, so why do you claim Japanese media is uncensored in one of your earlier posts? For me, I never claimed Chinese media is completely free and uncensored, so why is it you continue to bring up Chinese censoring, when majority of my sources is obtained from Wikipedia and other Western sources. If I have my own fallacies, then I have addressed them the best I can with sources, points and logical thinking, unlike you who resort to vulgar language against me, copying my texts and taking single lines out of context so that the original meaning is lost or it becomes different interpretation. You have shown nothing but contempt for any opinions that differ from your own. Just like you once said: "In Chinese movies, Japanese people are often portrayed as the devil." then what about in WW2 movies where Germans are portrayed as evil? What about WW2 video games about the Allies killing German soldiers? You obviously know nothing about Chinese movie industry, yet you presume to stereotype Chinese movies altogether? Overall, I still don't get why you claim to not defend Japanese warcrime, when you clearly are. I mean, just look at the amount of content you conjure to defend Japan, but hardly anything for USA. Why do you go so far when you are Non-Japanese? You don't have to stick up for them you know, so why go so far?
    1
  25915. +Rhyan Jill Baytos There is no mention of "flip" being used to define Filipino people in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filipinos although "pinoy" is often what Filipinos use to refer to themselves. The word "flippish" is defined in the dictionary to mean "fickle".
    1
  25916. +Rhyan Jill Baytos There is nothing factually wrong with my previous statement. If it's pun, then it is still not widely recognized. "Flip" has so many meanings, from "turning over", "good side", "fickle", etc, that who would think it refers to Filipinos? You appear to be hijacking an existing word, for definitions not many people in world recognized, since according to Wikipedia, there is no mention of "flip" being used by Filipinos to define themselves, especially since "pinoy" exists, and it is less ambiguous unlike the word "flip". +Captain Midnight My sentences only appear to don't make sense, because you keep snipping them off as individual lines instead of a cohesive paragraph. How are people going to understand a single line out of context, when you dissect everything I said? My own views towards Japanese are based on "actions" not "race" so again how is that racist? You claiming Chinese are obnoxious and bigot isn't racist, whereas I pointing out Japanese "actions" is racist? Even younger generation Japanese politicians continue to worship at Yasukuni, which the older generation like Hirohito quit visiting, so why you keep ignoring this simple fact that the young generation are doing? Am I blaming them on the basis of being Japanese? Of course not. If instead it were Koreans or Germans who invaded China then I would blame their "actions", not their race being Koreans or Germans. I shown tolerance when other Filipinos (and their grandparents) don't want to pursue justice for Japanese warcrimes, (but that doesn't stop other Filipinos from doing so) You have shown no instances of you changing your opinions towards Chinese at all, so how can you claim to be willing to change? Unlike you, I don't resort to vulgar language at you just because your views differ from mine. You claim I am intolerant, then what about you hurling insults at me, because my views differ from yours? The source of my hate doesn't make sense because it's not my own personal experience? What about you as American constantly cooking up excuses to explain Japanese actions? How is that personal? At least my grandmother lived through WW2, so its more personal for me, whereas it is very impersonal for you as American to get involved in Japan-China issues. Since Americans use N-word because they are not citizens of Africa, then isn't the half-Japanese who uses "Jap" because he is not a true citizen of Japan? He is Half-Japanese, for cry out loud, so one of his parents isn't Japanese in the first place, yet you take his view to represent that of native Japanese? Japanese war criminals are very open about talking about their crimes? Then why does he want to remain anonymous, if Japanese are so open about it? He want's anonymity so that he can say whatever he wants without persecution. The journalist is sworn to keep his name anonymous, so there's no point asking him to break his oath. Even if this guy should be in jail, but isn't, what about his superiors (the Class-A War Criminals) that gave him orders? Why are they allowed to be enshrined at Yasukuni and worshiped by politicians for their misdeeds? You constantly claim NOT to defend Japanese warcrimes, then why are you constantly making up excuses for them? You seen the atrocities they committed, so why stick up for them as American? MacArthur helped shield Hirohito and his family from the crimes, as well as protect the Unit 731 so is that why you are on their side as US citizen? I believe the original "goalpost" is that revised books still not banned. You claim that most Japanese don't support the books, then why is are the books still allowed to exist? Can the actions of few Japanese people prohibit the majority of Japanese from banning the book, if they choose to do so? For all your talk, there is still little action and progress towards removing the book. Who is the one first introduced Chinese textbook revision into this discussion in the first place? You blame me for moving the "goalpost" when you are the one brought up this issue? Japanese forces were present in Manchuria in 1931, so why can't China make that the start of Sino-Japanese war, just like when Nazi troops present in Poland in 1939? What is factually wrong with mentioning this statement? I already shown that our countries (China and Korea) bilateral relations with Japan have been damaged by politician visit to Yasukuni, so again how is that trivial affair? I also shown Korean media videos protesting about Yasukuni (and also comfort women issue) so how is it just limited to my view alone? You keep claiming that it is my own view when I supported my case with many other races protesting, including Koreans and some Filipinos so why you keep dismissing this event as trivial? If you claim it is "momentarily" forgotten, it doesn't mean it has been "permanently" forgotten, its just that current issues regarding DPRK take precedence over it. But does that mean China and Korea are going to forget Japanese actions? If it were truly "trivial" it would been forgotten long ago, isn't it? About removal of names in Yasukuni, its just said "It is thought that enshrinement is permanent and irreversible by the current clergy" but does that mean it cannot change? It's also done by current clergy so why can't Chinese fault current generation for enshrining those Class-A war criminals? You see, Korea and China weren't the ones who started this whole affair, the current generation Japanese did, with their "actions" of enshrinement. So why can't I blame them? Why suddenly talk about CO2 and Global warming? If you believe Tsunami and WW2 are not linked then it is your belief. Then why you call Chinese people bigots for our belief that the tsunami is act of punishment for Japanese war crimes? You personally believe there is no link, but others do, so who are you to call us bigots because of our beliefs? You understand concept of Karma and retribution, so how is our belief wrong? Can you actually prove that "souls" don't exist, neither does the underworld nor the reincarnation into deformity and insects for past crimes? Science unable to completely disprove the existence of underworld or afterlife, so why insult us when you are unable to completely prove our beliefs wrong? If there really is wheel of karma, then what's wrong with Chinese believe tsunami is punishment for Japanese warcrimes? Again, *China did not create the tsunami*. So you brought up meaningless survey? For what reason, if you don't use it? You are just dismissing two important figures of WW2 and their fates. One committed suicide and the other got US protection, so can't you understand the resentment behind this? You are just ignoring others people's point of view. About Chinese oppression, I already said Chinese government is not perfect. Which country government is perfect when starting out? You think every gov't knows how to govern a country at the beginning? What about Americans oppression of native Americans and importing African slaves? What about US greatest lynching (as shown in my source) in Chinatown? You don't flinch at this inhumanity? Gutmann just exaggerates 10,000 transplants a year to 100,000, and you just believe what he says? If its accepted in "court," then why don't you get support from the court to proceed? Look at the number of organ transplants around in the world and it is about 126,000 so how can China perform 100,000 transplants in a year? Do our hospitals have enough organ doctors to perform as much as the rest of the world to reach such a figure? Like I said, if you believe Falun Gong organ harvesting is still ongoing, then why doesn't President Trump or Vladir Putin, or Chancellor Merkel or other world leaders ever raise up the issue to President Xi? Right now, UN is interested in Rohigya crisis in Burma, so isn't that more pressing human rights issue? You despise Chinese anti-corruption campaign, when Trump doesn't even jail Clinton for corruption? What about Trump not releasing his tax details? What about ongoing FBI investigations into President Trump's election? Why have they been stopped? Why don't you fix your own country's problems, instead of looking down on Chinese attempts to crackdown on corruption? Weren't you the one brought up Chinese movies depict Japanese as the devil? What about American WW2 war videos and games depicting Germans as evil? What makes you think all Japanese people expose to the true history and know it, if the revised textbooks still exist? Those textbooks will influence young generation of Japanese kids to grow up without knowing true extent of Japanese atrocities, so again, why do you continue to invent excuses their actions? Your form of criticism is to hurl insults and abusive language like "tw@t" and "go F yourself". How is this actual logical criticism? You criticize Chinese as bigot for our belief in karma, but excuse Japanese worshiping Class-A war criminals? One is natural disaster whereas other was man-made war, so why are you labeling Chinese as bigots while making excuses for Japanese? Chinese people died at hands of Japanese, but Japanese died by tsunami, not Chinese, so why are Chinese bigoted and Japanese aren't? It is obvious that you harbor prejudice against everything Chinese do, while making excuses for Japanese war crimes. I don't mock or insult you for your beliefs, unlike what you do to me. I even question why you as American, try so hard to stick up for Japan and its atrocities. Because MacArthur defended Japan. Why you find nothing wrong with Japanese worshiping Class A war criminals, but label Chinese bigots for our belief in Karma? If you claim I am begging you to stop, then who is the one posting "I am finished with you" or "This is the last time I'm replying" Like I said, why do you do so much for Japan, yet claim to not be defending them? If you weren't defending them, then we wouldn't be having this discussion, wouldn't you agree?
    1
  25917. +Rhyan Jill Baytos So if "flip" is ethnic slur against Filipinos according to your sources, then why are you people even supporting it at all, and using it in advertisements and company names? "Flip" is what non-Filipino racists use to mock your people, and not normally what Filipinos use to refer to your own race. Pinoy is more neutral. Pinoy could potentially be a slur, but like you said, it is generally perceived as more positive than "flip". Flip has many potentially negative connotations behind it, such as "flippant" and so on, which is probably why it is not accepted as much. You call me stubborn and not knowing anything about your country, but I based my source off Wikipedia and in the website's actual content, (not simply the title of a citation) it does not mention even once that Filipinos use "flip" to refer to themselves. What you shown me so far, is that "flip" is a racial slur, but not that Filipinos use it to refer to themselves.
    1
  25918. +Rhyan Jill Baytos So because "flip" is only used by Filipino American youth, so does that mean Filipinos living elsewhere in the world recognize that term? You already shown many times that it is often regarded as racial slur, which could be one reason why it is not popular or in use. My Wikipedia source still shows there is no mention of "flip" being used by Filipinos to refer to themselves. (Flip is only mentioned in the citation as a title) whereas pinoy is more commonly known. It should be noted that Filipino Americans do not necessarily represent every Filipino, the same way African Americans are not Africans like Nigerians, Somalians, Kenyans, etc, whom are born in Africa. The word "flip" was invented in America after all, just like N-word, (and also "Jap" after WW2) so again, how can you people claim people born in Philippines, Africa and Japan even use such words to refer to themselves?
    1
  25919. +Rhyan Jill Baytos You have been saying that you are Filipino consecutively for the past few posts, so why should I now simply accept what you said? Simply because you spoke Tagalog and you claim to be Filipino? All you have shown so far -"flip" is a racial slur. -"flip" is a term used colloquially by Filipino American youth to refer to those of Filipino descent. -the term was first used among Filipinos sometime after his immigration to the United States (not Philippines) -many young Filipino Americans changed the first word of the acronym to funny, fine, or friendly (not Filipinos in Philippines) -In the Philippines, the slang flip was invariably used as an acronym for fine-looking island people by several advertisements. (But is it used to refer to themselves? It does not mention that.) What I have shown -There is no mention in Wikipedia, that Filipinos use "flip" to refer to themselves. -"Flip" is only mentioned in the citation as a title (and nothing about Filipinos referring to themselves by "flip") You can't even prove my Wikipedia article wrong, so you claim it's okay to admit that I'm wrong? Which part of my Wikipedia article is wrong then?
    1
  25920. +Rhyan Jill Baytos If you claim I am childish, then why is it you can't find any reliable source depicting actual Filipino people referring to themselves as "flip"? You really think urbandictionary is reliable for the definition of "flip"? Also you choose to look down on my Wikipedia source, when you are unable to prove it wrong, and instead claim that I should admit to being wrong? Which part of my Wikipedia article is factually wrong, that I must admit to it? Even if I confirm that you are Filipino through twitter and facebook, that still only represents 1 person claiming that Filipinos refer to themselves as "flip", whereas all sources you shown do not explicitly state that real Filipinos do. Only Filipino Americans do, and some of these Filipino Americans are technically "half-Filipino". I mean, if you claim I am being childish, then why can't you simply produce actual evidence that real Filipinos refer to themselves as "flip", not some Filipino American who thinks he can speak for all Filipinos? Why not find some actual dictionary or proof that Filipinos call themselves by this racial slur and prove me wrong?
    1
  25921. +Rhyan Jill Baytos What "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" If evidence is so readily available, then why can't you prove your claim directly? Wikipedia can be edited, then Urbandictionary can also be edited isn't it? If you aren't looking down on my source then why did you post the following "You call me stubborn and not knowing anything about your country, but I based my source off Wikipedia and in the website's actual content" You know it's okay to admit that you're wrong sometimes. Doesn't the above show that you look down on my basing my source off Wikipedia? All you shown is that Filipino Americans call themselves by the racist slur "flip" which already means they don't represent the rest of Filipino population living outside of America. Like you said the term "flip" was only used in America, but nothing about it being used outside of America. Just like African Americans using the N-word to refer to themselves, do you think true Africans like Nigerians, Somalians, Kenyans, etc would refer to themselves by that racial slur? So why would true Filipinos refer to themselves by "flip" in the same way?
    1
  25922. +Rhyan Jill Baytos You appear to be Filipino American (or at least, not fully Filipino), since you claim I won't believe you even if you grew up and lived all your life in the Philippines, which implies that you didn't. So doesn't it already shown that you are not true Filipino, just like African Americans aren't true Africans like Nigerians, Kenyans, etc? You shown that "flip" is invented in America, so doesn't that explain why you (as Filipino American) personally think "all Filipinos refer to themselves using flip?" But my Wikipedia source already shows that this fact isn't true. At the very least, only Filipino Americans continue to refer to themselves by this racial slur, just like African Americans use N-word on themselves, not Somalians, Nigerians, etc. All you shown so far is that Filipino Americans use "flip" but not that Filipinos generally refer to themselves as such. "Flips Flipping Pages" could so mean he is using 'flip" twice to emphasis on the action, not that "Flips" refer to "Filipino". Is the author of the blog a true Filipino, or Filipino American or from other countries? If in Wikipedia, the definition of "Filipinos refer to themselves as flip" doesn't work, it sinks to the bottom, meaning that majority do no support this decision. So why am I wrong here? +Captain Midnight Who is the one claiming Chinese people are obnoxious and bigoted, whereas I am not basing that all Filipinos call themselves by the ethnic slur "flip" based on what a single Filipino said? Who is the one making up excuses for Japanese people worshiping Class-A criminals enshrined in Yasukuni, while calling Chinese people "bigots" for believing in karma? You are obviously prejudiced against Chinese people, while sticking up and making excuses for Japanese atrocities (despite claiming not to) Who would expend so much energy conjuring articles to excuse Japanese warcrimes, but then claim not to be defending Japanese atrocities, and instead, claim to care about America? Why do you as American care so much about Japan and China anyway? The Yasukuni visits and revised textbooks are bilateral issues between China and Korea with Japan. Why is it you find nothing wrong with Japanese worshipping Class-A criminals for actual crimes committed at their hands, while labeling Chinese people bigots for believing in karma, when the tsunami was not China's doing? If you still think Falun Gong atrocities are happening, because Gutmann grossly exaggerates the figure of 10,000 transplants in China in a single year, to his own figure of 100,000 transplants, then why don't President Trump or other world leaders confront President Xi on these figures directly? I already shown people who disputed the Gutmann's exaggerated figure, such as organ experts Jose Ramon Nunez Pena, medical officer of the World Health Organization, and Michael Millis, vice-chairman for global surgery and director at the University of Chicago's School of Medicine Transplant Center, who dismissed the allegations as implausible. Here is the source again if you want to read about it. WHO Organ expert said the claimed number is equal to the transplant activity of the entire world and is practically impossible chinadaily.com.cn/china/2016-08/19/content_26531057.htm You abuse vulgarities such as "tw@t" against me and call Chinese people obnoxious and bigoted, but I don't insult you or make derogatory remarks about you, just because your views differ from mine. And since when did I even said anything "racist" towards Japanese? My views are based on their "actions" like such as enshrining Class A war criminals and revising their textbooks, not the "race".
    1
  25923. +Rhyan Jill Baytos If you think I am somehow wrong in my assumptions, then why not explain why "flip" is not even mentioned in Wikipedia at all (except only in citation, and as a title only) instead of just claiming it is incomplete? You claim Wikipedia is incomplete, because it omitted "flip", but you already shown that "flip" is ethnic slur so why is Wikipedia wrong for not including it? You already shown that "flip" is a term invented in America and used colloquially by Filipino Americans. So how does Filipino Americans refer to all Filipinos all over the world? The N-word for African Americans was invented in America, and used by African Americans today, but is it used by Nigerians, Kenyans, Somalians, etc? Of course not. So in the same way, why do you claim true Filipinos use this racial slur to refer to themselves, when it is not true, as shown in Wikipedia? Urbandictonary has its own way of defining things, and so does Wikipedia. So why assume Wikipedia is incomplete, simply because it does not have what is mentioned in Urbandictonary? What makes Urbandictionary any better than Wikipedia, such that is is more complete than Wikipedia? In "Flips Flipping Pages" they talk about things like Halloween, Star Wars, and other things usually associated with America, so isn't it possible that these people are Filipino Americans? As you shown, "flips" is used by Filipino Americans to refer to themselves, but it does not mean that Filipinos all over the world accept the racial slur. Otherwise, wouldn't it be reflected in sources such as Wikipedia? +Captain Midnight FlipScience is online news source (meaning that is is mobile) and not necessary meaning that it is based in Philippines. Like it said, the love for science and for knowledge is in a dire state in Philippines (said by FlipScience, not me) so isn't that why they create this online portal in the first place, when their country is uninterested in science? Those shops located in Manila have the world "flip" in their title, so it automatically means they are referring to Filipinos calling themselves by "flip"? So if a sandal shop in Manila called itself "The Flip Flop Shop" does it means that the "flip" in its title refers to Filipinos? "Flip" is just a word, and it has many, many definitions of its own, so how do you know that it is referring to the exact definition you people want it to refer to?
    1
  25924. +Rhyan Jill Baytos So why would Wikipedia cite an article containing "flip" but not used it in its definition? The people who edit Wikipedia and cited the article probably read the article but decided that it wasn't representative of the Filipino population as a whole. Why you claim because simply because it omitted "flip" that Wikipedia is incomplete? You mean they cite an article containing "flip" but they choose to omitted it from the whole page? Its obviously because "flip" is a racial slur and that's why no one wants to include "flip" on the Wikipedia page. Otherwise, why cite the article but not use the term? You claim this article is originally taken from Wikipedia, but if the article doesn't exist anymore, that means that the editors at Wikipedia realized it was untrue or at least not reflective of what Filipinos feel about themselves. You mean, it once existed, and was removed from Wikipedia, suddenly means Wikipedia is incomplete? Why was it taken down? Probably because Filipinos referring to themselves as "flip" is either inaccurate or untrue, or that most Filipinos don't want to be called by racist slur. Urbandictionary is informal, so again, how can it be more reliable than Wikipedia, which is stricter? In Urbandictionary, "anyone" can like it, including non-Filipinos, so how can you prove "flip" is actually how Filipinos refer to themselves? What if mischievous non-Filipinos "like" the definition, so that it wrongly propagates the false notion that Filipinos refer to themselves by this racial slur? So many silly words exist in Urbandictionary (including the hoards of bizarre sexual terms, lingo and positions) probably made up and not true, except by naughty teenagers who like them to support its definition, and still, you believe it? You Wikipilipinas article clearly states that the term is used by Filipino Americans, so are you now contradicting what you claim? There is even a journalist and activist Alex Fabros, Sr. (1903–1999) who claimed the term was first used among Filipinos sometime after his immigration to the United States in 1929, so how did it originate in US bases in the Philippines? Are you now contradicting what you said? Things like Halloween were only introduced to Philippines, because Philippines was once an American colony. So how can you actually prove that these people are all true Filipinos, when some of them may be Filipino Americans? Its from a blog, so it usually concerns a close group of people, which could be Filipino Americans judging by their preference of English over Tagalog. Such a blog is not representative of the entire Filipino population, especially the ones living in Philippines. Also, why is there a need to copy my text and repeat it in your posts? All you are doing it making it even harder for me to distinguish between which portion is being said by you and which is by mine. Are you just intentionally trying to make your posts longer to appear more scientific? +Captain Midnight About Clive Hamilton's Silent Invasion book, it is stated that he is against publishing the book because of potential "suing for defamation" action by Chinese government. Which part of what Chinese government is doing is illegal here? If the author slanders or makes up lies about Chinese government, then under Australian laws, Chinese government can legally sue the author for slander. If what the author says is the truth and nothing but the truth, then what has he to fear from being sued for defamation? He is speaking what he claims to be the truth, so why is he afraid of telling "lies" and being sued for it? Chinese government is not altogether forbidding Australian government from publishing the book if it wanted to, and its not like China will suddenly declare war with Australia over this book. China is approaching this situation through legal recourse, by suing for defamation under Australian laws, if what the book claims is untrue, so how would China be breaking the law here? Just because the book is by respected Australian professor, means it's immune to being sued? Source smh.com.au/national/free-speech-fears-after-book-critical-of-china-is-pulled-from-publication-20171112-gzjiyr.html China Uncensored is a notoriously biased source, that is prejudiced against Chinese government and will always include a slant against China in all of its videos. It will only mention the bad issues but not the good issues, and will always paint Chinese government actions in negative light regardless. I bet CU was how you first came to know of Falun Gong "organ harvesting" in the first place. Also, was CU the source who told you Chinese movies only portray Japanese as the devil? They show some videos of Chinese war movies (without actually telling you the title) and claim that all Chinese portrayal of Japanese are like this? Why don't they show Chinese movies where some Japanese have also been portrayed ordinarily or as honorable characters, like in Jet Li's Huo Yuanjia (霍元甲)? Also, even if you disbelieve all my Chinese sources, then what about my previous sources showing the statistic regarding total number of organ transplants in the world was 128,000 in 2015, and Gutmann grossly exaggerating that 100,000 transplants occurred every year in China, instead of 10,000 transplants? Does China have as many transplant doctors necessary to perform transplants to meet such a drastic figure as the transplant doctors from the rest of the world put together?
    1
  25925. +Rhyan Jill Baytos The article was only cited because it contains references to Filipinos referring to themselves as "pinoy" which is used in the Wikipedia article. However, Wikipedia did not write to include "flip" as Filipino referring to themselves. You have already proved that "flip" is racial slur in one of your earlier articles ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_slurs#F ) isn't it? So why is it wrong to assume that it was deleted from Wikipedia, because Filipinos did not want to call themselves by such a racial slur? Again you resort to copying my text and dissecting it again and again. Why do you do this? You are making it difficult to differentiate which text is written by me, and which is yours. You didn't actually say anything about Urbandictionary that makes it more reliable than Wikipedia. I mean, just browse through Urbandictionary, and every other word is referring to sexual slang, lingo, positions, etc. Aren't most of them just made up, probably by kids with nothing better to do? Wikipedia is also not entirely reliable, but many people would still prefer Wikipedia over something like Urbandictionary, because of its sources. If "flips" originates because of anti-Filipino sentiment during WW2, then why has it been adopted by Filipino Americans then? The term was obviously born in America, not the Philippines. Just like the N-word for African Americans is not used by true Africans like Kenyans, Somalians, Nigerians, etc. Like you said, only Filipino Americans use the term "flip" to refer to themselves, but not all Filipinos, since it is racial slur, as shown in Wikipedia. I mean, if you really claim that Filipinos do refer to themselves as "flip" then why isn't this reflected in Wikipedia? Because you can't prove it, therefore you claim that it is incomplete? Although Wikipedia unreliable, Urbandictionary is even more unreliable, and also, the term "flip" could be voted up by the Filipino Americans, but not all Filipinos. You have shown "flip" to be a racial slur, and that could account for one reason why Filipinos do not recognize the term to refer to themselves. "Flip" has so many definitions, so again, how can you be exactly sure which definition of "flip" is being used each time? For example, FlipScience logo has the word "science" with the letters inverted/flipped backwards, so it could be that "flip" refers to this. How do you know which exactly definition of "flip" is being used?
    1
  25926. Why are we suddenly talking about Filipinos when the original topic is about China and Japan in the first place? For all your talk, you failed to explain why Wikipedia does not show Filipinos referring to themselves as "flip". You claim I am trying to look correct, when you can't even prove Wikipedia wrong? Why can't I use Wikipedia instead of listening to what some stranger online who claims to be Filipino says? The original topic is about Japan and China isn't it? All I did was mention Unit 731 warcrimes and then suddenly everyone seems to jump to Japan's defense. You have seen the horrible atrocities they committed, yet why are you people continuing to stick up for them? If you bring up old and new generation again, I already said the old generation like Hirohito despises the younger generation Japanese politicians visit to Yasukuni shrine, so why can't I blame the young generation then? What about the doctored historical textbooks used by Japan to downplay their atrocities of Rape of Nanjing, Unit 731 and "comfort" women? These books will go on to influence a new generation of Japanese schoolkids to grow up without learning the true Japanese atrocities. In Germany, it is illegal NOT to mention Hitler and Nazism, and to downplay their atrocities, so why is Japan allowed to get away with this? You claim Yasukuni shrine visit is trivial, but even Koreans protest against Japanese politician visit as well. South Korean grannies who were "comfort" women victims also protest outside Japanese embassy because in Japanese textbooks "comfort" women were well-paid prostitutes by the government. It is very likely these elderly women will die, being remembered as government prostitutes by Japanese students. Why you people believe its okay for Japanese to enshrine Class-A warcriminals and worship them for actual crimes that took place, but it isn't okay for Chinese to believe in karma from an act of nature creating the tsunami that swept across Japan? One was man-made and the other was act of nature. If you believe that they aren't linked, then why are you calling Chinese people bigots for our belief in karma? To you, they aren't linked isn't it? You claim I am racist but what racist remarks did I make about Japanese? Can you quote any "racist" remarks I made about Japanese, blaming them for their "race" and not for their "actions"? Once again, I blame them for their "actions" and I didn't attribute any derogatory remark to Japanese "race". What about you people claiming Chinese people are rude, obnoxious and bigoted here? Lastly, I am not the one resorting to abusive language against you people for your views. But you people continue to insult me and call me "tw@t" and "go F yourself" and so on, simply because my views differ from yours, and resort to attacking me personally instead of attacking my points logically. China is not perfect (as I said many times) and many of you people despise Chinese people, our country, our government, our belief in karma, while appearing to support Japanese warcrimes, their worshiping beliefs, their government's actions, even those of younger generation. But modern China was built by hard work of Chinese people's efforts after post-WW2 whereas Japan had help from America to get to where it is today. After WW2, Japan, China and Korea were in ruins, but America protected the aggressor country (Japan) from retaliation by its victims (China, Korea, etc) and invested much money into developing Japanese economy. Japan was demilitarized and protected by US presence instead, whereas every other country in the region (including China) had to allocate money to a defense budget to protect our countries. But Japan didn't have to spend on defense, so it poured the money for defense into developing its economy instead. Otherwise, why is it few years after WW2, Japan had soared to become the most advanced East Asian country ahead of China and Korea? It had help from America, who protected it and developed it. I still don't understand why you people continue to defend the aggressor country of WW2. Is it because you people are Americans and American allies, that you can overlook Japanese warcrimes?
    1
  25927. +Rhyan Jill Baytos Firstly, this thread was initially about China and Japan, but you have hijacked it to talk about Filipinos. I was talking to someone about China and Japan, and mentioned Filipinos in a statement, and suddenly you jumped claim that I am not correct, when I quoted Wikipedia as my source. Since you can't seem to prove Wikipedia wrong, then why am I wrong in my assumptions then? I have shown my source for my assumptions. Wikipilipinas cites its source material from Wikipedia, so why is Wikipilipinas correct, and Wikipedia wrong? You are being biased and illogical in justifying Wikipilipinas over Wikipedia. Who is allowed to vote in Urbandictionary? Anyone can vote in Urbandictionary, including non-Filipinos, so why is Urbandictionary representative of what Filipinos think of themselves over Wikipedia? The brand names could have different meanings, and I already shown FlipScience has the letters of "Science" inverted backwards, but again you refuse to accept any one of my definitions, despite them being fairly obvious. So how are you going to accept my proofs then? Also, why are you accusing me of being paid troll or from 50 cent army? For expressing my view? If I was really like that I would have resorted to vulgar language and abusive remarks, but again, I don't do that, just because your views differ from mine. Some other people like Captain Midnight have used derogatory terms against me, so why aren't you accusing them of being trolls, instead of me? If I am free to believe what I want, then why are you the one constantly trying to distract me from this discussion about China and Japan? I didn't butt into your conversation, you interjected into my discussion when the original topic is about China and Japan.
    1
  25928. I have already given my explanation regarding FlipScience but once again, your people refuse to accept it, so it is your choice. I have shown evidence in Wikipedia, that Filipinos do not refer to themselves as "flip" and that "flip" is only mentioned in a title in the wiki's citation that's all. You people incessantly claim that I am not right here, but you can't even prove Wikipedia wrong or incomplete or whatever? "Flip" has so many other meanings, and in FlipScience it could also represent the creator's desires to "flip" the existing lack of interest in Philippines to create a society more conducive to science. But does it mean that Filipinos refer to themselves as "flip"? Where does the page even show Filipinos referring to themselves as "flip"? All the website shows is that they want to reverse the scientific situation in Philippines that's all. You have other sources, but your already shown that Wikipilipinas cites from Wikipedia, so why is Wikipilipinas correct (or complete or whatever) while Wikipedia is wrong (or incomplete, etc)? You are just trying to confuse people with terminology instead of addressing the point directly in the first place. As for Urbandictionary, its already known that anybody can vote to raise these terms, including non-Filipinos so how can you still claim that Filipinos refer to themselves by "flip" then? You consistently deny my Wikipedia source, but biasedly promote your Urbandictonary source? Why do you you harbor unfair double standards with regards to different sources? I don't understand why is it you claim Wikipedia is incorrect or incomplete, but somehow expect me to substantiate my claims about Wikipedia. Why should I do this? Aren't you the one claiming Wikipedia is incomplete here, not me? Lets go back to the beginning, where I made a short statement about Filipinos not referring to themselves as "flip". It is you who interjected, and when I showed Wikipedia as my source, you claim "flip" is in the citations, but when I claim "flip" is not in the main content, you started calling Wikipedia incorrect or incomplete. So why am I the one suddenly having to explain Wikipedia's incorrect/incompleteness here? You are the one being unable to prove the source which I cited my reference from as wrong/incomplete, not me. You are just biased twisting my logic and attempting to confuse other people that's all here. Like I said, the original topic is about Japan and China, not Philippines. I did mentioned Philippines and Filipinos a number of times, but I mostly remained on topic, but you people just claim that I am not right, but are unable to refute my Wikipedia source at all, so why do you claim I am not right?
    1
  25929. I have stood by my arguments, unlike you people who resort to abusive language and derogatory terms, attacking me instead of attacking my points. I have made numerous explanations regarding FlipScience but you people consistently rejected all of my explanations whatsoever, and insisted on your own claims. Where in the FlipScience website does it even say that the "Flip" in "FlipScience" is what Filipinos used to refer to themselves? The whole website talks about improving the state of scientific education in Philippines that's all, so why are you mocking my explanations, when you have nothing to show for your own explanation of FlipScience? I used Wikipedia as my platform for my views, but you people claim I am not right, but can't even prove my source wrong/incomplete. You claim Wikipedia is incomplete, because Wikipillipinas has "flip" but then again, Wikipillipinas cites its article from Wikipedia which no longer exists. So again, how have you successfully proven that Wikipedia is incomplete, when Wikipillipinas cites directly from Wikipedia? Your own source cites from Wikipedia, but you still claim Wikipedia is incomplete? You are applying unfair double standards for your own sources as compared to mine. Many other people believe in Wikipedia sources, so why are you people ridiculing me for quoting Wikipedia as a source? Can you actually prove that it is wrong/incomplete in the first place? As for the whole difference between "incorrect" and "incomplete" issue, I have never said my English is absolutely perfect, so why are you people resorting to attacking my imperfect English instead of attacking my points? My English is poor, but many other people in this thread also have poor English, but I don't stoop to your low level of attacking other people's use of the language and abusing derogatory terms against them. Why are you attacking me for my language skills instead of using logic to address my points? Do I impose my level of language comprehension against you people? For Urbandictionary, we are trying to prove the original point that Filipinos refer to themselves as "flip". Since anyone can vote in Urbandictionary, including non-Filipinos then how is it reliable as a source at all to show that Filipinos refer to themselves as "flip", if the people who are voting could possibly be non-Filipinos themselves? Can't you see your own illogical biased here towards your own sources as compared to mine? I still don't understand why you think Urbandictionary is more reliable than Wikipedia, when Urbandictionary functions by random people voting, whereas Wikipedia has strict guidelines with regards to its sources, as you have shown. Once again, why is it I have to prove my assumptions about Wikipedia is incomplete? Did I made the accusation that Wikipedia is incomplete? No, you did. You mean deleting an citation, automatically means Wikipedia is incomplete? How? You are the one making unreasonable demands out of me all the time, and expecting me to comply with you. Do I make such demands out of you? No and I don't mock you people because your views happen to differ from mine. You claim you don't care what I think, then why are you posting so many posts about my views on Philippines? I accept it when you and your grandparents don't care about WW2, so why are you constantly claiming I am not right, when you can't even prove my source wrong? Also, isn't the original issue about China and Japan, not Philippines? If you people accuse me of being a 50 cent troll, then why aren't I spamming posts for money then? Why is a 50 cent posting about Philippines instead of China? You people accuse me of being 50 cent without even applying your own logic to this discussion, and you people are the ones using abusive language like "tw@t" and "go F yourself" and even making fun of my name, Shenzhou. Do I make fun of your names or abuse vulgar expletives against you people, because your views happen to differ from mine? I mean, if you people don't care about how I view Philippines, then why are you spamming posts about Philippines then? I have stated my stance using Wikipedia as my source, so exactly what am I doing wrong here?
    1
  25930. You people constantly accuse me of being Chinese 50 cent troll, when currently this is topic is more towards Philippines? What sort of twisted logic are you using to support your accusation of me being a 50 cent troll in the first place? I don't abuse vulgar language against you people, like what Captain Midnight is doing, simply because our views are different. Even if I disagree with you, I don't resort to abusive language like those trolls like Captain Midnight. Why don't you accuse him of being a troll then for his abusive language? What about you who keep on derailing this topic by bringing in Philippines? You keep on rejecting my all my explanations of FlipScience then what do you expect me to do? I at least offered numerous explanations, based on the website's content, whereas nowhere in FlipScience does it even say Filipinos refer to themselves as "flips" so can't you see your own prejudice in your logic? What's the point in giving more explanations about FlipScience when you people incessantly ridicule all my explanations, while being unable to give solid explanations of your own. Why then should I just accept your explanations then, when you have disregarded all of mine? I already said that I made my views based on Wikipedia, so again, why do you keep claiming I am wrong, but still unable to prove my source wrong? Wikipedia, on the whole, is still a reliable source like it or not, and it probably has more accreditation than other dubious sources like Wikipilipinas or Urbandictionary. You continuously mock me quoting Wikipedia when many other people also use Wikipedia as their source for information? You gave your own sources, and I highlighted some flaw in those sources (which you continuously ignore) so how do you expect me to prove anything at all, when you refuse to accept anything I say? Now you are claiming I am dishonest? How? I provided sources to support my claims, and even offered my own take towards sources you produced, but still you are labeling me dishonest here? How? Isn't it factually true that FlipScience logo has the letters of "Science" inverted, and that there is no explanation of Filipinos referring to themselves as "flip" in the website? Like I said, you people resort to attacking me personally, instead of attacking my points. I do not label you "dishonest" just because your views differ from mine, but you people use all manner of derogatory terms against me that's all. I don't even make fun of your people's English, because I have never claimed that my English is perfect so I don't stoop to your level of mocking other people's English. But you people are consistently mocking me for my use of English and making a whole issue of it. If you claim Urbandictionary is informal, then it already goes to show that Filipinos referring to themselves as "flip" is at the most, informal, and that Filipinos will not do that formally. Otherwise, what are you trying to say here? You mean a group of random people voting up a term in Urbandictionary automatically means that this term is formally accepted, whereas in Wikipedia (which has stricter guidelines) does not recognize the use of this term? You have already failed to show the original point of Filipinos use "flip" to refer to themselves using Urbandictionary, since random people can vote in Urbandictionary, so what is the basis for you using Urbandictionary as your source at all? Now when did I even said that Wikipedia is incomplete at all? Why are you suddenly pinning me for claiming Wikipedia is incomplete, and expecting me to prove it? I don't have to prove anything about Wikipedia being incomplete or wrong or whatever, because I am not the one mocking my own source here. You are, so what on Earth are you expecting me to prove in the first place? I don't understand why my defending China automatically means I am being morally abhorrent here. Who are the ones jumping to defend Japanese warcrimes in the first place? Who are the ones finding nothing wrong with Japanese worshiping Class-A warcriminals enshrined in Yasukuni, while labeling Chinese people who believe in karma as being bigots when the Tsunami hit Japan? You people obvious harbor prejudice against China, our people and government, and make racist remarks about Chinese by calling us obnoxious or bigoted based on race, whereas I have not said anything remotely "racist" about Japanese. I repeatedly stated that my remarks are based on "actions" not "race" but you people just keep on ignoring what I say. Otherwise, why don't highlight an example of me blaming the Japanese "race" instead of their "actions"? Just under a week ago, on 13th December, many Chinese people paid respects to The Rape of Nanjing, where thousands of Chinese men were butchered by Japanese and Chinese women raped by Japanese soldiers and killed afterwards to silence them. Naked bodies are left exposed and mutilated. Women private parts were bayoneted or penetrated with sharp bamboo shafts. Young children were not spared too, and if they were too small, the Japanese soldiers cut them open in order to rape these kids to death. Pregnant women too, were targeted for murder, and their swollen bellies bayoneted, sometimes after rape, and the unborn fetus pulled out and stabbed. The Japanese soldiers forced victims to commit acts of incest among families, where sons raped mothers and fathers raped daughters Nanking Massacre wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre If you claim that I somehow lack an interest towards Philippines, then likewise, you people also lack an interest regarding China. I am not forcing you people to take an interest if you don't want to (since this issue is primarily between China and Japan) but if you want to criticize Chinese people mindset, then you should at least make an attempt to understand us before jumping to criticize us and defend Japanese warcrimes.But none of you people on this thread is even Japanese, so why are you constantly trying to stick up for Japan, and label me morally abhorrent? Regarding Philippines, I have already repeatedly stated my stance and given my Wikipedia source for my statement, so why do I even need to elaborate further on my stance? You people can't even refute my source properly, yet you claim that I am not right here? I don't even mock you people or insult you for not agreeing with me, so why do you people resort to abusive language, just because my views differ from yours?
    1
  25931. +Rhyan Jill Baytos Why did you even mention 50 cent troll then, if you didn't say that I am? People from 50 cent army will be talking about Chinese government, not about Philippines now isn't it? Which part of my simple remark about Philippines reveals that I am from 50 cent army at all? You are just making up illogical accusations about me without any evidence whatsoever. I have already given other explanations for FlipsFlippingPages etc but again, you completely reject any of my explanations, so again what's the point of continuing to pursue them? You simply refuse to consider any of my statements, and just dismiss them entirely, so how do you expect me to explain my point? In FlipsFlippingPages does the website even say anything about Filipinos referring to themselves as "flips"? You can't even prove such a simple point at all, yet constantly accuse me of being wrong and disregarding everything I said? Who is the one making up assumptions that he himself can't even prove? Why don't you tell me exactly how you proved Wikipedia is incomplete? In Wikipilipinas, it cited an article from Wikipedia, which is now deleted, so how is Wikipilipinas even more reliable than Wikipedia now? You believe in your source Wikipilipinas, when it has to cite from Wikipedia in the first place? Can't you see how unfair you are being in your judgement of sources? Wikipedia has strict guidelines for its sources, but does Wikipilipinas have such strict guidelines? Why then do you accept Wikipilipinas over Wikipedia? I am not the one labeling you dishonest, unlike what you keep doing to me. I do not mock your English or anything, unlike what you keep doing to me. You have shown to be interested in attacking me personally instead of attacking my points. Just because my English is not good, so it gives you the reason to ridicule my language skills instead? Which part of FlipScience having its letters in "Science" inverted is factually wrong? Why can't you pick out the part that says "Filipinos refer to themselves as flip" in the FlipScience website? Yet you still accuse me of being dishonest? Urbandictionary being informal already places it in a position much lower than that of Wikipedia. I mean, even in Wikipedia, it is mentioned that Filipinos use "pinoy" to refer to themselves, but nothing about using "flip" to refer to themselves. "Flip" is only mentioned in the citation as a title, but otherwise, nowhere does it say Filipinos use "flip". So doesn't that mean that "pinoy" is formally accepted, whereas "flip" isn't, by your definition of what is formal? If that is the case, then how is my very first and original statement wrong? I made that remark some time ago, using Wikipedia as a source, and it still stands formally today isn't it? Why is it you claim "informal" sources like Urbandictionary are more reliable, while "formal" sources like Wikipedia isn't? Are you really blind to your obvious prejudice against these two sources? You accepting informal, while ignoring formal? I have never said Wikipedia is incomplete in any way, so again, why is there suddenly a need for me to prove anything now? Like I said before, you are the one first claim Wikipedia is incomplete, so why are you dragging me into this, when you are the one first made such a claim in the first place? I don't understand why you think I want to prove such thing. How doe proving Wikipedia wrong/incomplete help in my argument at all? Why should I do that? Wikipedia is my source from which I acquired my current stance, isn't it? Who is qualified to judge whether something is morally abhorrent or not? Morality is defined differently by different people in different countries, so how is it you can just judge people like that? I don't judge you or your grandfather and grandmother if you choose to ignore Japanese WW2 atrocities altogether, unlike what you done to me. Do you even attempt to understand Chinese people's feelings and mindset before judging straightaway? No, so why call me morally abhorrent then, just for stating my own views? Going round in circles? Excuse me, but I have been offering numerous different explanations regarding various topics about FlipScience and so on, but you people have rejected everything I say, labeling me "dishonest" and other terms. And you people keep on insisting that Filipinos refer to themselves as "flip" when such a statement is not entirely present in your sources at all. So who is repeating himself in a circle here? You people refuse to talk about Japan and China at all (which is the original topic) but instead prefer to talk about some term Filipinos claim to call themselves by, without any concrete proof whatsoever. Since you lack a specific concrete proof yourselves, then how can you still claim that I am not right here? Nobody is forcing you people to post here if you don't want to. People like Captain Midnight keep on claiming this will be your last post, that you don't care about what I believe, and I can believe what I want, so who is stopping you from posting or not posting? Like you, I don't care if this is your last post or not. All I did, was make a simple remark about Filipinos, but it was you people that choose to comment on that remark. My original stance still remains, as supported by the source accompanying it.
    1
  25932. It's obvious that the one resorting to abusive language like "tw@t", "go F yourself" and making fun of other people's names is the real kid here.
    1
  25933. Max Headroom If we are talking about pollution then yes, China has the problem of pollution, but it was because our country industrialised much later than the West. Western countries have been polluting the Earth for 200-300 years since the Industrial Revolution first started in 1700-1800s. As for China, we only began industrialisation 30 years ago as compared to the West. Chinese government also making efforts to clean up the environment in China, but it will take time to truly observe the effects. Take London for example. 50 years ago, the river Thames was so heavily polluted that it was considered biologically dead. London also had bad air quality, and there was even a Great Smog of London in 1951. Looking at London today, you won't have believed that it was so heavily polluted back then. In the same way, Chinese government is also taking steps to reduce air pollution by banning coal fired power plants, which burn dirty and produce smog. But of course it will take time to reap the benefits, and China is doing all of this in decades, compared to the West taking centuries to actually clean up their countries China halts over 100 coal power projects reuters.com/article/us-china-coal-idUSKBN151090
    1
  25934.  @anthonyrockets2945  Because the war did not start a month ago, it started back in the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Ukrainian President Yanukoyvch by the USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Kiev. Russia is not starting a war, they are putting an end to one that began 8 years ago.
    1
  25935. Trump launched the trade war against China.
    1
  25936. Trump imposed tariffs on China.
    1
  25937.  @KamillGran-ch5sb  How is pointing out what Trump did akin to having TDS?
    1
  25938. China reserves the right not to allow certain movies that violate the government's criteria to be shown in China. And if Hollywood was truly pandering towards China, they would have researched the lead actor Simu Liu's history for remarks that badmouth their intended market.
    1
  25939.  @platosbeard4449  Agreed. Like Russia, China has developed hypersonic weapons like the DF-ZF that's launched from the DF-17 missile, that's been tested seven times. Just that China's hypersonic weapon has not been tested in actual combat like Russia's Kinzhal has.
    1
  25940. +chris kay Ultimately, its the fact that US sanctions don't work, that is the main point the OP was trying to make.
    1
  25941.  @johanhirte9661  You said: "The problem is just that the forced labour won't appear there. They come for a short period like borrowed labour force." If the so-called forced labour is only borrowed, then how's that considered forced labour at all, if it's only temporary? Where do the workers go if they aren't employed? Also like I said earlier, you can check past records, the turnover rate, the worker salaries, whether the wages are sufficient, the worker's dormitories, food provided, and other more permanent features, what makes you think you can hide a borrowed labour force for long? Like what Sketchers did, you can also conduct a surprise audit to catch any wrongdoing unawares. But nothing out of the ordinary been found from Sketchers' audits. And what has the Chinese government even got to do with workers that clothing companies hire for their cotton factories? It's the clothing companies' choice whom they hire, what's the Chinese government even got to do this? You can't refute this point so you keep bringing up 1958? Lastly, Sketchers at least bothered to conduct audits, then why didn't H&M, Nike, Adidas, Uniqlo bother to do audits themselves? We are talking about why didn't clothing companies conduct audits themselves, like what Sketchers did.
    1
  25942.  @johanhirte9661  You said: "of those 1.3m patent applications, almost all – 1.25m – were applications filed by Chinese companies. Yet, only 26 per cent of residents had their applications granted, which stands in sharp contrast to the 68 percent of non-residents. This may suggest that domestic patent applications are of a lower quality. Jump to the US, and the ratio of US to foreign success is roughly equal – a 51 per cent success rate for residents vs. 53 per cent patent grants for non-residents." The brainpower of the United States was literally founded upon immigrant success. The German Albert Einstein and the South African Elon Musk are two such examples of immigrants before they applied for American citizenship, so what's the point of bringing up whether a patent applicant comes from resident or non-resident, when USA itself is literally a country of immigrants? This has more to do with different immigration policies of different countries, rather than patents application.
    1
  25943.  @johanhirte9661  You said: "invention patents accounted for only 19.3 percent of the total number of grants, and utility model and design patents accounted for 44.5 percent and 36.2 percent, respectively." From what I understand, USA has utility patents (354,430) accounting for overwhelming 90% of the total number of grants (391,103) in 2019. So China's 19% being invention patents is actually higher than the USA's.
    1
  25944.  @johanhirte9661  "神州 Shenzhou The “innovation patents” is a characterization that applies different rules. It is not a invention in the way as u think." First you said "invention patents accounted for 19.3 percent" now you're changing China's figures again? And you clearly said "invention patents" what's this about "innovation patents" and claiming it's not an invention in the way I think? These are all your own words so far. You said: "The Chinese don’t do that a lot. Only 4% of their patents is also applied abroad because they won’t even hold up against the patent laws in the west." About international patents, China in 2019 surpassed the United States of America (U.S.) as the top source of international patent applications filed with WIPO amid another year of robust growth for the Organization’s international intellectual property (IP) services, treaty-adherence activity and revenue base. Source: China Becomes Top Filer of International Patents in 2019 Amid Robust Growth for WIPO’s IP wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2020/article_0005.html _With 58,990 applications filed in 2019 via WIPO’s Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) System, China ended the U.S. (57,840 applications in 2019) reign as the biggest user of the PCT System that helps incentivize and spread innovation. Are you perhaps using old data? In 1999, WIPO received 276 applications from China. By 2019, that number rose to 58,990 – a 200-fold increase in only twenty years. And triadic patents are a series of corresponding patents filed at the European Patent Office (EPO), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Japan Patent Office (JPO), for the same invention, by the same applicant or inventor, that's all.
    1
  25945.  @johanhirte9661  "神州 Shenzhou A surprise audit !? ...... so the investigators travel to China without a visa !? Without telling the embassy what is their Interest on entering China !?" How does Chinese embassy even know that those travellers applying for VISA are auditors themselves? By stating business, the auditors don't have to reveal that they are auditors. How do you expect Chinese government to exactly know which auditor is visiting which company? And at which time period will the auditor arrive on site? And let's say that even if you still believe that there is widespread forced labour, suddenly changing the labor force overnight won't cover the tracks. Experienced auditors will know right away if that there has been a sudden change in staff, change in working conditions, wages paid, whether worker dormitories are slept in, and so many other clues revealing a sudden change before their arrival. At this point, claims of forced labour in Xinjiang are just your own speculations that's all. Even so, it still boils down to the fact that Sketchers conducted 2 audits (1 of them a surprise audit) whereas H&M, Nike, Adidas, Uniqlo did not conduct audits of their own, they just blindly believe the Better Cotton Initiative without proof or audits.
    1
  25946.  @johanhirte9661  "神州 Shenzhou No of the year 2016." Why are you using 2016 data? You can't accept the fact that China surpassed USA in international patents since 2019? You said: "Internationally doesn’t mean they applied in each country around the world. It means internationally so many applied in each office." That means that China applied patents internationally, so what's your point then? You said: "Just because China is leading some Industries it doesn’t mean it is the innovation hub of the world and all others are stupid u know" You're the one constantly mocking China's achievements all this time, did I ever said China is the innovation hub of the world, or that all others are stupid? You're the one constantly s**tting on anything positive I said about China. You said: "Also this patent comparisons don’t being anything. U would also have to look in which field. What tech is that. What advantage does it bring bla bla bla bla bla." So let's look at some fields. According to Forbes: China Leads The U.S. In Patent Applications For Blockchain And Artificial Intelligence forbes.com/sites/ralphjennings/2018/05/17/how-china-pulled-ahead-of-the-u-s-in-patent-applications-for-new-technology/ China ranks first in the world in the number of patent applications from two heavily watched, fast-growing areas of high tech: cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence, claims American startup ecosystem research organization Startup Genome in a 2018 report.
    1
  25947.  @johanhirte9661  A triadic patent doesn't necessarily mean that its of the highest quality, it just means 1 idea protected in many areas, how does that translate into a highest quality patent? I check the OECD definition, oecd-ilibrary.org/industry-and-services/triadic-patent-families/indicator/english_6a8d10f4-en it doesn't mention anywhere that they are considered the highest quality patent. A triadic patent family is defined as a set of patents registered in various countries (i.e. patent offices) to protect the same invention. Triadic patent families are a set of patents filed at three of these major patent offices: the European Patent Office (EPO), the Japan Patent Office (JPO) and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Triadic patent family counts are attributed to the country of residence of the inventor and to the date when the patent was first registered. This indicator is measured as a number.
    1
  25948.  @johanhirte9661  _ I go there and then come to the conclusion that there is forced Labour and send this report to my headquarter and they publish it."_ Why not wait till you're outside of China before publishing it? Why send the report while you're still in China? You said: "If I as a company accuse China of forced Labour, then my company gets kicked out the next day." So your company care more about making money than about your principles? Even if your company is kicked out of China, you can still go India, Vietnam, etc, it's not the end of your company. Look at Facebook, Google, YouTube, they are blocked in China, yet they are fine with it. But if you go around making accusations without any proof whatsoever (like what H&M, Nike, Adidas, Uniqlo did) then Chinese reserve the right to boycott your company, when you malign our country, yet still want Chinese to continue buying your brand. You said: "In Xinjiang u go trough a checkpoint every 200 meters basically. The moment u enter Xinjiang with a foreign passport. U will have a 3 -5 min conversation with the police of why u are in Xinjiang, what is ur job, purpose bla bla bla bla bla." Tell them the same thing you told the Chinese embassy when you applied for VISA. And again, even if there is a cover-up, experienced auditors know how to look for signs of corruption cover-ups (it's their speciality as auditors) whether it's sudden change of staff, working conditions, wages paid, dormitory conditions, and a number of other clues. The fact remains that Sketchers bothered to conduct audits, whereas H&M, Nike, Adidas, Uniqlo, didn't. I mean, if they found evidence of forced labour in Xinjiang, then that's their defense, but now they have nothing to support their claims, only the Better Cotton Initiative's word, that's all.
    1
  25949.  @johanhirte9661  "1 patent applied in China, US, Japan and EU !!!!" That just means multiple countries recognise this patent, how does this explain that the patent quality is higher? If multiple countries apply for a weak patent, it's a triadic patent, but still a weak patent.
    1
  25950.  @johanhirte9661  "神州 Shenzhou Something positive about China !?" China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network, surpassing even Japan's Shinkansen hi-speed rail in terms of track length. Our high-speed trains are world class, the journeys very smooth and enjoyable. Passengers have even experimented by balanced small objects like coins, stationery and smartphones on their edges in a train traveling at 350 kph, and the objects remain undisturbed (even stagnant water remains still) for long period of time. youtu.be/fumYdO9XknE Prior to the advent of high speed rail, during the Spring Festival, people in China would make the trip back to our home province to spend the new years with family and friends and the journey would often take several days. But thanks to China's high-speed rail, the commuting times have been cut short, from days to mere hours.
    1
  25951.  Fishka Grishka  The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  25952.  @johanhirte9661  I showed you the OECD definition, oecd-ilibrary.org/industry-and-services/triadic-patent-families/indicator/english_6a8d10f4-en it doesn't mention anywhere that they are considered the highest quality patent. A triadic patent family is defined as a set of patents registered in various countries (i.e. patent offices) to protect the same invention. Triadic patent families are a set of patents filed at three of these major patent offices: the European Patent Office (EPO), the Japan Patent Office (JPO) and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Triadic patent family counts are attributed to the country of residence of the inventor and to the date when the patent was first registered. This indicator is measured as a number. Yet why did you say OECD definition claims they are the highest quality patents?
    1
  25953.  @johanhirte9661  "神州 Shenzhou So ur company cares more about making money than about principles !?" Since you gave negative examples of Apple, H&M, Nike not caring about workers (those are your words) then why suddenly out of the blue, those clothing brands suddenly worry about alleged forced labour in Xinjiang cotton and make statements about it? And the point remains that Sketchers actually bothered to conduct audits whereas H&M, Nike, Adidas, Uniqlo didn't even bothered to conduct audits of their own, so what defence do you even have for H&M, Nike, Adidas, Uniqlo? You're literally calling those clothing companies hypocrites who care more about making money than upholding actual principles that they claim to have. And Sketchers managed that surprise audit, despite your unproven claims of the Chinese government somehow "magically knowing" that an auditor is arriving in Xinjiang. And even so, experienced auditors know to sniff out a cover-up, (that's what they are trained to do) to find out if records have been suddenly changed prior to their arrival on site. There's no way to cover-up forced labour, because that's what auditors specialise in, sniffing out corruption cover-ups.
    1
  25954.  @johanhirte9661  China is home to world's largest highspeed railway network. Here's a list of countries by high-speed rail lines in operation. Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines
    1
  25955.  Fishka Grishka  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  25956.  @johanhirte9661  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity.
    1
  25957.  Fishka Grishka  In 2002, China had 0km high speed rail but in just 15 years, China catapulted to having 38,000km, surpassing the rest of the world by more than double the combined track length. youtu.be/zkMnxJF22O8?t=120 And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  25958.  Fishka Grishka  Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought. But do Chinese people complain about Westerners making use of Chinese inventions? Where would Westerners be today if not for Chinese inventions?
    1
  25959.  Fishka Grishka  China can support 20% of the world's population with only 7% arable land and still produce surplus food for export. Look at India (world's largest democracy) and they're ranked 94th in _Global Hunger Index,_behind Nepal (73), Pakistan (88), Bangladesh (75), Indonesia (70) among others.
    1
  25960.  @johanhirte9661  You said OECD definition claims they are the highest quality patents, but I showed you the OECD definition, oecd-ilibrary.org/industry-and-services/triadic-patent-families/indicator/english_6a8d10f4-en it doesn't mention anywhere that they are considered the highest quality patent. A triadic patent family is defined as a set of patents registered in various countries (i.e. patent offices) to protect the same invention. Triadic patent families are a set of patents filed at three of these major patent offices: the European Patent Office (EPO), the Japan Patent Office (JPO) and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Triadic patent family counts are attributed to the country of residence of the inventor and to the date when the patent was first registered. This indicator is measured as a number.
    1
  25961.  @johanhirte9661  You're the one who claimed Nike treats their workers bad, yet now H&M, Nike, Adidas, Uniqlo are suddenly interested in alleged forced labour in Xinjiang cotton? At least Sketchers performed 2 audits and used them to continue to their products, yet why did H&M, Nike, Adidas, Uniqlo choose to blindly believe the Better Cotton Initiative's word? Corruption is universal phenomena and every country suffers from corruption to a certain degree. But at least under President Xi Jinping, there are ongoing anti-graft campaigns to deal with the mountain of corruption inherent within the communist party. But when is the last time a country like USA had anti-corruption campaign of its own? Hillary Clinton is corrupt politician and Donald Trump promised to jail her during his Presidential campaign. But after he became president, no further action been taken against Clinton for corruption.
    1
  25962.  @johanhirte9661  Did you know that the 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and a traitor to his people? The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government (Beijing). Declassified CIA files have exposed that a total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) Source: CIA Tibetan program wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Costs So here we have concrete evidence that the 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the USA to engage in separatist activities against the Central People's Government.
    1
  25963.  @johanhirte9661  Would people have even be able to invent these, if not for Chinese invention of paper? The Chinese inventions of Paper and Printing accelerated the spread of ideas and knowledge throughout the ancient world. With paper came inventions like paper lanterns, paper umbrellas and paper banknote (which made business transactions easier since merchants need not carry around lots of metal coinage and precious stones) Mankind's first aviation was in the form of paper kite, and even hot air balloons were invented in China, and were known as Sky Lanterns (天灯) or Kongming Lanterns (孔明灯) Here is beautiful video of RISE Lantern Festival in Las Vegas, celebrated with Chinese Sky Lanterns. Video: youtu.be/SNtwlBbBdb4?t=10 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience) About electricity, Benjamin's kite experiment won't have happened if not for Chinese invention of the kite. Also you said The University, but Chinese literally invented exams back during the Imperial Exams taken by Chinese scholars. In China a higher education institution Shang Xiang was founded by Shun in the Youyu era before the 21st century BC. The Imperial Central Academy at Nanjing, founded in 258, was a result of the evolution of Shang Xiang and it became the first comprehensive institution combining education and research and was divided into five faculties in 470, which later became Nanjing University. In the 8th century another kind of institution of learning emerged, named Shuyuan, which were generally privately owned. There were thousands of Shuyuan recorded in ancient times. The degrees from them varied from one to another and those advanced Shuyuan such as Bailudong Shuyuan and Yuelu Shuyuan (later become Hunan University) can be classified as higher institutions of learning. Source: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy#China
    1
  25964.  @johanhirte9661  You said: "10. Machines (basically every modern machine)" A crucial component of any mechanical device is the gear or cogwheel, which was invented in China. The oldest known gears date from the 4th century BC in China (Zhan Guo 战国 times – Late East Zhou dynasty), which have been preserved at the Luoyang Museum (洛阳博物馆) of Henan (河南) Province, China. Source: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gear#History "5. Electricity" Benjamin's kite flying experiment won't be possible if not for Chinese invention of the kite. "7. Medicine" Traditional Chinese Medicine has thousands of years of history, yet you're calling it nonsense? Vaccines were invented in China. The earliest hints of the practice of variolation for smallpox in China come during the 10th century. The Chinese also practiced the oldest documented use of variolation, dating back to the fifteenth century. Various insufflation techniques have been recorded throughout the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries within China. Two reports on the Chinese practice of inoculation were received by the Royal Society in London in 1700; one by Martin Lister who received a report by an employee of the East India Company stationed in China and another by Clopton Havers. Source: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine#History "14. Rockets 🚀" Rockets were invented in China. The first gunpowder-powered rockets evolved in medieval China under the Song dynasty by the 13th century. The Mongols adopted Chinese rocket technology and the invention spread via the Mongol invasions to the Middle East and to Europe in the mid-13th century. Rockets are recorded in use by the Song navy in a military exercise dated to 1245. Internal-combustion rocket propulsion is mentioned in a reference to 1264, recording that the "ground-rat", a type of firework, had frightened the Empress-Mother Gongsheng at a feast held in her honor by her son the Emperor Lizong. Source: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket#History Did you just pull off a list of inventions without bothering to check whether Chinese innovation was involved in it's design?
    1
  25965.  Fishka Grishka  "神州 Shenzhou India doesn't use slave labour as Chinese do !!" India is home to the largest number of enslaved people in the world at 18 million modern slaves. Source: Quartz India: India has 18 million modern slaves—at least five times more than any other country in the world
    1
  25966.  @johanhirte9661  Look at Donald Trump signing away 100 Presidential Pardons on his last day in office. That's literally legalized corruption and nothing being done about that. Trump is the only US President to be impeached twice and he got away both times, yet you want to mock China's anti-corruption efforts? Over 100 officials of provincial-ministerial level and above have been implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China, which began after the 18th Party Congress in 2012.
    1
  25967.  @johanhirte9661  A rocket 🚀 is a rocket, Chinese invented the first rockets, you just mock Chinese inventions because you look down on China's innovation that's all. Chinese invented gunpowder and gunpowder weapons like handcannons, handgrenades, fragmentation bombs, landmines, naval mines, exploding cannonballs, rocket launchers, multi-launch rockets, and of course, fireworks. Americans celebrate the 4th of July with Chinese inventions, and world's oldest conformed surviving firearm is the Heilongjiang 黑龙江 handcannon, manufactured no later than 1288. Source: Heilongjiang hand cannon wikipedia.org/wiki/Heilongjiang_hand_cannon A 14th-century military treatise, the Huolongjing (Fire Dragon Manual), describes hollow cast iron cannonball shells filled with gunpowder. The wad of the mine was made of hard wood, carrying three different fuses in case of defective connection to the touch hole. Source: Landmine wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_mine#Gunpowder Chinese records tell of naval explosives in the 16th century, used to fight against Japanese pirates (wokou) wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_mine#History Source: The earliest rocket launchers documented in imperial China consisted of arrows modified by the attachment of a rocket motor to the shaft a few inches behind the arrowhead. wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket_launcher#History Source: The first multiple rocket launchers were made during the mediaeval Chinese Song dynasty. wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_rocket_launcher#History
    1
  25968.  @johanhirte9661  Chinese literally invented examinations, it's thanks to China that students all over the globe take exams in schools, yet you want to boast about inventing the university? Standardized written examinations were first implemented in China and were commonly known as the Imperial Examinations (keju 科举) https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_(assessment)#History China had institutes of higher learning, such as the Imperial Central Academy at Nanjing, founded in 258, was a result of the evolution of Shang Xiang and it became the first comprehensive institution combining education and research and was divided into five faculties in 470, which later became Nanjing University. https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy#China How would Benjamin's kite experiment happen if not for Chinese invention of the kite? Hot air-balloons were invented in China through sky-lanterns (孔明灯). Even the concept of the helicopter rotor was invented in China. The use of a rotor for vertical flight has existed since 400 BC in the form of the bamboo-copter, zhuqingting (竹蜻蜓) https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helicopter_rotor#History
    1
  25969.  @johanhirte9661  "神州 Shenzhou So u want to say that it is ok for Xi to be corrupt and avoid tax because trump was corrupt what logic is this?" Where's your evidence that President Xi Jinping is corrupt? President Xi Jinping's salary is just $22,000 a month, even lower than Indian PM Narendra Modi's salary of $30,000 a month. And where in the the panau papers does it actually mention that President Xi Jinping is corrupt? It lists some President Xi's family assets, but those are his families' assets, not his own, so how is President Xi corrupt? Where's your evidence? Whereas Trump is blatantly abusing Presidential powers to sign away 100 Presidential Pardons on his last day in office, yet what punishment being made against Trump? Trump got impeached twice and gotten away each time, yet you want to talk about how China deals with corruption?
    1
  25970.  @johanhirte9661   You said: "Be honest and look around u. What around is not western !? Clothes !? Trousers were invented in China. The oldest known trousers were found at the Yanghai cemetery in Turpan, Xinjiang, western China and dated to the period between the 10th and the 13th centuries BC. Made of wool, the trousers had straight legs and wide crotches and were likely made for horseback riding. wikipedia.org/wiki/Trousers And cars, planes, boats, and other mechanical contraptions, they make use of gears, which are a Chinese invention. The oldest gears in the world date back to 400 BC and have been preserved at the Luoyang Museum of Henan Province, China. You're literally surrounded by Chinese inventions, but you close your eyes and pretend that they are Western inventions that's all.
    1
  25971.  @johanhirte9661  "神州 Shenzhou And I don't look down on Chinese inventions." You obviously do, you mocked every Chinese invention I brought up, now you claim you don't look down on Chinese inventions? Trousers, Cogwheels, Gunpowder, Kites, Paper, Rockets, Firearms, Vaccines, all you done is sh*t on everything China does. You're not even Chinese yourself, yet you constantly bring up the Panau Papers, but where in those papers does it show that President Xi Jinping is corrupt? His family has offshore assets, those are his family's issues, it doesn't mean President Xi is corrupt, where's your proof that President Xi is corrupt like you claim? Whereas Trump can blatantly get away with corruption in USA, escape 2 impeachments yet you want to lecture China on our anti-corruption efforts?
    1
  25972.  @johanhirte9661  I literally gave you evidence that declassified CIA files revealed that the 14th Dalai Lama received CIA money to train Tibetan guerrillas against the Central People's Government. The Americans did not care about Tibetan independence, they only wanted to undermine communist countries. In his 1991 autobiography Freedom in Exile, the 14th Dalai Lama criticized the CIA for supporting the Tibetan independence movement "not because they (the CIA) cared about Tibetan independence, but as part of their worldwide efforts to destabilize all communist governments". In 1999, the Dalai Lama claimed that the CIA Tibetan program had been harmful to Tibet because it primarily served American interests, claiming "once the American policy toward China changed, they stopped their help". This supported by the fact that after US President Nixon's 1972 visit to China, the Americans stopped supporting Tibetan independence. Today, the USA recognises Tibet Autonomous Region as part of the People's Republic of China.
    1
  25973.  @johanhirte9661  You said: "Why the tsinghua or Fudan operate the same way as western universities in its Rea search?" Why students take examinations all over the globe and operate the same way as Chinese Imperial Examinations did? You're so blind to Chinese inventions all over the world, because you mistake Chinese inventions as Western inventions. The trousers people wear were invented in China. Machines that use the cogwheel, a Chinese invention. Everywhere, Chinese influence is right in front of you, but you close your eyes and pretend that they're Western inventions that's all. I mean, would Britain even been able to colonise America, Australia, Asia (India, Hong Kong, Singapore) and Africa, if it weren't for the Chinese invention of gunpowder?
    1
  25974.  @johanhirte9661  So you agree that Trump is corrupt, then why isn't there anti-corruption drive in the United States? The corruption is in your face, yet you complain about China's anti-corruption crackdown? And you keep on bringing up President Xi Jinping's family assets, but where's your proof that President Xi Jinping himself is corrupt? You got nothing to prove President Xi Jinping is corrupt, then why are you going on about corruption without proof? I mean, you're not even Chinese yourself, you're just biased against China's anti-corruption efforts that's all.
    1
  25975.  @johanhirte9661  Speaking of landing on the Moon, China has even landed on the Moon. In 2013, China landed our very own lunar spacecraft and lunar rover (Chang'e 3 嫦娥-3 and Yutu 玉兔 "Jade Rabbit") on the Moon, making China the world's 3rd nation to make a soft-landing on Earth's celestial neighbor. In October 2015, the Jade Rabbit set the record for the longest operational period for a rover on the Moon. The rover's ground penetrating radar found evidence of at least 9 distinct rock layers. youtu.be/XpAwmVPT758 Through this, China is showing that Chinese people are capable of achieving equally impressive feats as Westerners in space.
    1
  25976.  @johanhirte9661  About ancient writing scripts, Chinese characters constitute the oldest "continuously" used system of writing in the world, having been used since 1200 BCE and today, Mandarin Chinese is the most spoken language in the world by number of speakers. Whereas other ancient scripts like Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia) Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered dead languages today, since they are no longer evolving with the times and no new words being added into their vocabulary. wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_characters
    1
  25977.  @johanhirte9661  So Egyptians get credit for inventing writing, but China gets no credit for inventing rockets 🚀? What biased double standards is this? Also, there are some Chinese writings dating back to 6000 BC in Jiahu (贾湖契刻符号). Jiahu symbols comprise one such collection of symbols that are believed by many to be the oldest written words. Jiahu symbols comprise 16 different signs, markings or pictograms found carved on tortoise shells over 8,500 years old. These shells were excavated from a burial ground unearthed at Jiahu, a Neolithic archaeologist site in Henan province in western China. Radiocarbon dating of the Jiahu site puts it between 6600 BC and 6200 BC. The Neolithic Jiahu symbols predate the earliest recorded Mesopotamian writings by over 2,000 years. ancient-symbols.com/symbols-directory/jiahu.html And what makes you claim the Chinese language didn't progress progressed? Chinese characters are still very much in use today whereas Egyptian Hieroglyphs, Sumerian Cuneiform and Latin are dead languages and no longer evolving with the times. Today, Mandarin Chinese is the world's most spoken language by number of speakers too. How am I wrong about Latin? Latin is classified as a dead language today, since there are no native speakers of Latin and no new words being added into Latin vocabulary. Why can't I talk about Chinese characters? You can boast about Egyptian writing, then why can't can't I do the same for Chinese writing? You aren't even Egyptian yourself, are you? About naval technology, Chinese sailors invented the bulkheads (partitions) on Chinese junks that are now used in boats worldwide, to compartmentalised flooding below decks. Song Dynasty author Zhu Yu (fl. 12th century) wrote in his book of 1119 that the hulls of Chinese ships had a bulkhead build. The 5th-century book Garden of Strange Things by Liu Jingshu mentioned that a ship could allow water to enter the bottom without sinking. wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulkhead_(partition)
    1
  25978.  @johanhirte9661  Ancient Chinese metallurgists invented the world's first blast furnace, cupola furnace, and finery forge using hydraulic bellows to achieve the temperatures high enough to smelt iron ores. Chinese metallurgists were the first to discover pig iron, cast iron, wrought iron, and even discovered a method to make steel by fishing cast iron and wrought iron together, using puddling to improve the steel-making process. Source: Blast Furnace wikipedia.org/wiki/Blast_furnace#History Source: Cast Iron wikipedia.org/wiki/Cast_iron#History Source: Puddling wikipedia.org/wiki/Puddling_(metallurgy)#History The skyscrapers that you're so in awe of, are constructed from steel, which wouldn't have been possible if not for Chinese metallurgists inventing the blast furnace, to smelt iron ore. About farming, Chinese have been cultivating rice between 11,500—6,200 BC with the earliest known cultivation from 5,700 BC, followed by mung, soy and azuki beans. Recent genetic evidence show that all forms of Asian rice, both indica and japonica, come from a single domestication event that occurred 8,200–13,500 years ago in the Pearl River valley region of China. In China, extensive archeological evidence points to the middle Yangtze and upper Huai rivers as the two earliest places of O. sativa cultivation in the country. Rice and farming implements dating back at least 8,000 years have been found. Source: History of rice cultivation ricepedia.org/culture/history-of-rice-cultivation
    1
  25979.  @johanhirte9661  Trump have 6 ongoing investigation, just to prove the blatantly obvious point that he's corrupted? Trump also nominated Judge Amy Coney Barret to the Supreme Court (which got accepted in just weeks) and she was sworn into the Supreme Court. This means Trump has an additional ally on the Supreme Court when he is finally brought to court, making it even harder to convict Trump of corruption. As for President Xi Jinping, where's your evidence of President Xi's corruption? The Panau papers only talk about Xi's family's assets, but where does it show actual evidence of President Xi's alleged corruption? Since there is no proof of Xi's corruption, then what's your point then?
    1
  25980.  @johanhirte9661  Besides landing on the Moon, China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far. This shows how far China has progressed. From an ancient 5000-year-old civilization into a modern spacefaring nation. I hope more Chinese should stop seeing ourselves as somehow inferior to Westerners and to starting seeing ourselves as equals, capable of achieving equally amazing feats in space as Westerners.
    1
  25981.  @johanhirte9661  I'm not discrediting the Egyptians, I'm saying why do you credit the Egyptians with invention of writing, but not the Chinese with the invention of the rocket 🚀? Why the biased double standards against Chinese inventions here, you tell me?
    1
  25982.  @johanhirte9661  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat. This shows China is both an ancient civilization as well as a modern spacefaring nation. If China can someday surpass the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this eventual goal of ours? Nobody said USA has to remain on top all the time. Also, I'm still waiting for actual proof of President Xi's corruption like you accused. The Panau papers talk about Xi's family's assets but where's the link to show that President Xi Jinping himself is actually corrupt? You've given no proof of President Xi's alleged corruption, yet you're still mocking China's anti-corruption efforts?
    1
  25983.  @johanhirte9661  I'm saying why are you discrediting China for the invention of the rocket 🚀 that's all. Chinese also invented the first multistage rocket wikipedia.org/wiki/Multistage_rocket#History_and_development An illustration and description in the 14th century Chinese Huolongjing (火龙经) by Jiao Yu and Liu Bowen shows the oldest known multistage rocket; this was the "fire-dragon issuing from the water" (火龙出水, huǒ lóng chū shuǐ), used mostly by the Chinese navy. It was a two-stage rocket that had booster rockets that would eventually burn out, yet before they did they automatically ignited a number of smaller rocket arrows that were shot out of the front end of the missile, which was shaped like a dragon's head with an open mouth. This multi-stage rocket may be considered the ancestor to the modern YingJi-62 ASCM.
    1
  25984.  @johanhirte9661  "神州 Shenzhou I'm not double standards about Chinese inventions" Yes you are, you've been mocking China's inventions every time you post a comment, and sh*tting on China's achievements every opportunity. You literally gave Egyptians credit for writing, yet refuse to give China credit for the invention of the rocket 🚀, despite the sources that I cite. About medical technology, China conducted the world's first 5G remote surgery on test animal. The doctor is located some 50km away from the operating theater, using robotic arms to operate on a test animal and remove its liver. Video: China completes world’s first 5G remote surgery in test on animal youtu.be/yFR61jjL1vo
    1
  25985.  @johanhirte9661  China has even launched space stations into orbit, the world's 3rd to do so after USA and USSR. China's first prototype space station, Tiangong-1 was launched in 2011, followed by Tiangong-2 in 2016. There was even a "space lecture" where Chinese taikonaut in space gave a lecture to her students on the ground from onboard Tiangong-1, demonstrating simple micro-gravity experiments in space. Video: Chinese teacher in space gives lecture to her students on the ground below youtu.be/OUAuZnpoZ58 By doing this, we are showing our kids (and future generations of Chinese) that China is both ancient civilization as well as a modern space nation, capable of achieving equally impressive feats as the Westerners in space. China is no longer the sick man of Asia, in fact, China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, and India have not launched space stations of their own into orbit. This shows how far China has progressed, from a 5,000 year old ancient civilization into a modern spacefaring nation.
    1
  25986.  @johanhirte9661  So far you keep on bringing up President Xi Jinping's family assets, but where's the actual link showing President Xi Jinping's alleged corruption? His family owns assets, but you no link to President Xi Jinping himself being corrupted, what's your point then. For example, you said Xi's family accumulated $1 billion in wealth and his daughter owns $50 million worth of Hong Kong real estate. But President Xi Jinping has an estimated net worth of only $1.3 million. thenetworthportal.com/celeb-net-worth/politicians/xi-jinping-net-worth/ Хі Јіnріng hаѕ а lоng роlіtісаl саrееr. Не оnlу еаrnѕ а rеаѕоnаblе аmоunt оf mоnеу frоm hіѕ роѕіtіоnѕ іn thе Сhіnеѕе Gоvеrnmеnt. Оn thе оthеr hаnd, hіѕ ѕіѕtеr аnd brоthеr іn lаw аrе buѕіnеѕѕ tусооnѕ іn Сhіnа аnd оwn аrоund $500 mіllіоn. Whеrеаѕ, іt hаѕ bееn rероrtеd thаt Хі, іmmеdіаtеlу аftеr bесоmіng рrеѕіdеnt аdvіѕеd hеr ѕіѕtеr tо ѕеll оff hеr buѕіnеѕѕеѕ аnd аddіtіоnаl rеѕіdеnсеѕ. Іt іѕ bесаuѕе Хі wіѕhеd tо аvоіd аnу ѕоrt оf mеdіа соvеrаgе іn thіѕ rеgаrd. Хі Јіnріng hаѕ аn еѕtіmаtеd nеt wоrth оf оnlу $1.3 mіllіоn. Хі Јіnріng іѕ а vеrу роwеrful mаn. Не hаѕ uѕеd hіѕ роwеrѕ vеrу wеll tо fіght аgаіnѕt thе соrruрtіоn іn hіѕ соuntrу. Не hаѕ рrоvеn tо bе а grеаt lеаdеr fоr hіѕ соuntrу аnd hаѕ wоrkеd rеаllу hаrd tо mаkе есоnоmіс аnd ѕесurіtу аllіаnсеѕ. …… This completely blows your so-called theory out of the water. You're making corruption accusations against President Xi Jinping where no such evidence exists to actually implicate President Xi in corruption, you're just making up an imaginary link where none exists.
    1
  25987.  @johanhirte9661  What is the definition of a rocket 🚀, you tell me? A self-propelling device, esp a cylinder containing combustible composition to propel itself. With such a definition, Chinese clearly invented the rocket, yet why are you deliberately not crediting China with the invention of the rocket? And you're the one giving credit to the Egyptians (are you Egyptian yourself?) but not to Chinese invention of the rocket? You can praise Egypt then what's wrong with me bringing up Chinese inventions then? Ask you this question, which ancient writing system is more widely used today: Chinese characters or Egyptian hieroglyphs?
    1
  25988.  @johanhirte9661  This is what you wrote earlier: 14. Rockets 🚀 15. Spaceships So I was clearly referring to 14. Rockets 🚀 and pointing out that Chinese invented the first rockets, to which you started mocking, even though I cited historical evidence to support my case.
    1
  25989.  @johanhirte9661  "神州 Shenzhou Omg ok so the one that build the First Carriage gets credit for inventing the car !? The oldest gears or cogwheels in the world have been preserved at the Luoyang Museum of Henan Province, China. That's what I've been saying all this time, but you conveniently ignored it all this time.
    1
  25990.  @johanhirte9661  "神州 Shenzhou ok Chinese invented the rocket 🚀." That's what I've been saying all this while, you're the one constantly mocking China's invention of the rocket.
    1
  25991.  @johanhirte9661  "神州 Shenzhou The panama Papers are just one thing. There have been other things many assume Xi was involved in but of course no one found him guilty." So you have zero evidence of President Xi's alleged corruption, despite harping on this issue for so long? What are these "other things" apart from the Panama papers? Let's hear them!
    1
  25992.  @johanhirte9661  So you have proof of President Xi's families assets abroad, but where's your concrete evidence that President Xi Jinping himself is corrupt? All you seem to have are unfounded speculations that's all.
    1
  25993.  @johanhirte9661  How much is Xi Jinping Worth? Xi Jinping net worth and salary: Xi Jinping is a Chinese politician who has a net worth of $1 million. He is a member of the Communist Party of China and is most well-known for serving as the General Secretary of the Communist Party of China, the President of the People's Republic of China, and the chairman of the Central Military Commission. Salary: The President of the People's Republic of China earns an annual salary of ¥152,121 RMB which is the same as around $22,000 USD. celebritynetworth.com/richest-politicians/presidents/xi-jinping-net-worth/
    1
  25994.  @johanhirte9661  Hey you keep on talking about President Xi Jinping's family assets, but I'm asking you for concrete proof that President Xi Jinping himself is corrupt, but you keep on talking about his family, because you got no proof.
    1
  25995.  @johanhirte9661  I searched President Xi Jinping's net worth and found this: As of April 2021, Xi Jinping's Net Worth is estimated at $1.5 million. His annual salary is $22300. His salary was increased recently by 62% as a part of a broader pay increase for civil servants.
    1
  25996.  @johanhirte9661  "神州 Shenzhou answer me this question. Why there is no investigation into his family assets !?" Because President Xi Jinping's family aren't communist members themselves so they aren't involved in China's anti-corruption crackdown. The answer so simple, you have absolutely zero evidence of President Xi's alleged corruption, you constantly talk about his family assets, but where's your evidence that President Xi Jinping himself is corrupt? You got zero concrete evidence, only your own biased speculations that's all. 跟我说中文干嘛？你都没有什么证据。
    1
  25997.  @johanhirte9661  lol, Vladimir Putin. Donald Trump lives a luxurious lifestyle, playing golf almost every week, this is how it is in corrupt American democracy. Yet you constantly complain about President Xi Jinping's alleged corruption, without offering a single shred of proof of your claims.
    1
  25998.  @johanhirte9661  The President of China has a net worth of around $1 million. according to IBT Times.
    1
  25999.  @johanhirte9661  You doubt that all of them are not communist party members, then who in Xi Jinping's family (apart from Xi himself) are communist party members? I answered your question, you can't refute my points, you just continually bring up President Xi's family assets, but where's the actual evidence that President Xi is corrupt himself? I'm still waiting for your concrete evidence, all sources of information indicate that President Xi net worth is around $1 million.
    1
  26000.  @johanhirte9661  So Donald Trump is a business man before he was a politician, then why the heck Americans think electing a candidate with zero political experience to become President of the United States? Such a flawed political system, and you want Chinese to abandon our own political system (which has been successful for China) and adopt Western brand of democracy? And about corrupt democracy, yes the Republic of China 🇹🇼 was corrupt democracy before the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 took over. Why then should China revert back to Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    1
  26001.  @johanhirte9661  I gave you sources showing that President Xi Jinping net worth is around $1 million and his salary is about $22,000 a month, even lower than Indian PM Narendra Modi's salary of $30,000 a month. You keep bringing up President Xi's family assets, but where's your evidence that President Xi Jinping himself is corrupt? You got zero evidence of President Xi's alleged corruption, yet you want to complain about corruption in China? You're not even Chinese yourself for crying out loud, you're just mocking China's anti-corruption efforts that's all.
    1
  26002.  @Scambuster491  Because many in Singapore still suffer from the "colonial mentality". Even though Singapore has been physically decolonized, the "decolonization of the mind" needs to happen in order to reverse the mental conditioning inflicted by the colonizers on the minds of the colonized. Only then can the people truly be free.
    1
  26003.  @Scambuster491  Singapore has been ruled by the authoritarian single party PAP for 57 years, much like how China has been ruled by the single party CPC for 73 years. Is this really the system that the British left in Singapore? If you ask me, Singapore's system shares more in common with China's.
    1
  26004.  @Scambuster491  Singapore's opposition is a joke, they exist mainly to keep the PAP looking good and competent. According to HRW (Singapore): Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. The government has aggressively enforced a sweeping “online falsehoods” law that permits government ministers to order the “correction” or removal of online content. - Human Rights Watch: Singapore Doesn't Singapore's political systems sounds very much like China's in this regard?
    1
  26005.  @Scambuster491  Singapore's opposition is a joke, they exist mainly to keep the PAP looking good and competent. According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. ... Source: Human Rights Watch (Singapore) Doesn't Singapore's political systems sounds very much like China's in this regard?
    1
  26006. Meanwhile... Trump: Saudi Arabian Crown Prince did nothing wrong with murder of Khashoggi. He was a rogue operative, an enemy of the state after all! Saudi Arabia: Muahahaha!
    1
  26007. +nguyen khanh China isn’t the only one building islands in the South China Sea Vietnam also builds artificial islands in South China Sea according to following source: businessinsider.sg/vietnam-building-islands-in-south-china-sea-2016-5/?r=US&IR=T North Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Van Dong also acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese in this diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg
    1
  26008. +nguyen khanh China's artificial islands aren't "built from scratch". The construction activities on China’s islands and reefs are conducted on "natural features" over which China has sovereignty and which form part of the Nansha Islands. China is not "creating any new artificial islands" from the seabed. scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/1986732/debunking-10-myths-about-china-and-south-china-sea Whether China or Vietnam does it more, both countries are doing it, so how does this excuse Vietnam's actions from China's here? You are just making up excuses for Phan Van Dong's letter to justify Vietnam breaking its word. During Qing dynasty, France recognized China's sovereignty over the Paracel and Spratly archipelagos, in exchange for Chinese recognition of Vietnam as a French territory. Then in 1933, France seized the Paracels and Spratlys, announced their annexation, formally included them in French Indochina (Vietnam). Then during WW2 it was captured by Japanese, and after Japanese surrender, USA helped China reclaim Spraty and Paracel Islands. Vietnam only "inherited" those islands because of what France did in 1933, so how is that justification of Vietnamese ownership of Paracel and Spratly? If Phan Van Dong had formally objected to Chinese ownership of Spratly and Paracel, then why didn't he clarify his stance first?
    1
  26009. +한국어로변역하는인간 I can also say USA using South Korea as puppet to promote warmongering. China does not have any military bases stationed in North Korea, whereas S. Korea has 28,500 American soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines in South Korea, so which country is puppet here? Why S. Korea allow USA to install THAAD within their lands? Even S. Koreans are protesting THAAD deployment by USA shown below. South Korean Villagers Protest Plans for U.S. Missile Defense System nytimes.com/2016/07/14/world/asia/south-korea-thaad-us.html
    1
  26010. +nguyen khanh So Vietnam can inherit claims from former government, but China can't do that? Why are you applying unfair double standards here? Republic of China claims also follow Qing dynasty as well. Qing dynasty had protested against the France claim to Spratly Islands, and France and Qing China made a deal to recognize the Spratly and Paracel as Chinese, while China recognizes Vietnam as colony of France. Since you say Vietnam can inherit the claim, then why can't China do so as well? What do you mean the note was between 2 PMs and not officially between 2 governments? It had mentioned that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." and the note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. How is it not official, if it had been published in Vietnamese newspaper? You dismiss my sources, but what sources do you even have to proof your case?
    1
  26011. +한국어로변역하는인간 Actually, South Korea got rid of nuclear weapons because of pressure from USA. According to globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/rok/index.html "S. Korea began nuclear weapons program in 1970, in response to Nixon Doctrine's emphasis on self-defense for Asian allies. Following the withdrawal of 26,000 American troops, the S. Korean government decided to pursue nuclear weapons. By 1975 the US had pressured France into not delivering a reprocessing facility, effectiely ending attempts to develop nuclear weapons. Under pressure from the United States, Korea ratified the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) on 23 April 1975." So which country here is being puppet state of another power like USA? China does not "control" N. Korea at all, and like I said, China maintains zero military bases in North Korea, whereas S. Korea is host to many US troops garrisoned there. As for N. Korean missile technology they make use of Russian missile technology, not China's. According en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hwasong-14#Engine The North Korean Hwasong-14 missile's engine is based on the Soviet RD-250 (R-36 (missile)) family of engines according to British sources and they were probably acquired though illicit channels operating in Russia and/or Ukraine. In August 2017 the State Space Agency of Ukraine claimed that the rocket engine used during 28 July 2017 North Korea's missile test was RD-250 made at a Ukrainian factory. According to South Korean intelligence, North Korea received 20 to 40 RD-251 engines from Russia in 2016. So why blame China when the missile engines are believed to come from Ukraine and/or Russia?
    1
  26012. +The Anti-White Ranger About the "half breeds" in China, the key factor is to educate the children of mixed marriages in Chinese, send them to Chinese schools, teach them Chinese language, teach them Chinese history, Chinese laws, Chinese philosophy, Chinese mannerisms until they themselves think they are Chinese themselves. Here is a video about a girl from a Nigeria-Chinese marriage and being brought up under Chinese Education system has reinforced her perceptions of being Chinese. Video An Interview with Blasian (Black Asian) Princess Of China youtube.com/watch?v=QOD_ZsSc9Zc&feature=youtu.be&t=454 In my opinion, there's nothing wrong with importing 3rd world labor force, as long as you bring only one gender alone (like African men, Vietnamese women, etc) because they will take on a Chinese spouse and their children undergo Chinese education to reinforce their nationalism to China. But in Western countries like USA, Canada and Europe you take in the immigrant's entire family, all their cultures, beliefs, practices and their own perceptions of themselves. And your Western laws religious laws are too loose, meaning that they are free to practice what they want. For example, many Muslim refugees immigrate to your predominately Christian countries, but because Western laws allow them to do what they want, they continue their traditional practices, such as wearing Muslim headveils in public, and many Christian Americans, Canadians and Europeans aren't too happy about that. And because you import the whole family, the people can always marry their own kind, and many Muslims have larger families (also because they can take on multiple wives) as compared to Christian Caucasian families. Lastly, when Muslims marry, they have to convert non-Muslims to their faith. That's why you need to learn to control immigrants to your country, not the other way round. If you don't control immigrants, the immigrants will control you.
    1
  26013.  @og6433  So I take it that you don't have evidence of Medvedchuk being a crook? That you're not a prosecutor and I'm not a judge? Then why should I believe what you say that Medvedchuk is a crook without evidence? You said Medvedchuk has hundreds millions of dollars, then why didn't get the heck out of Ukraine, if he was in it for the money and not for his country? I suggest you watch Oliver Stone's 2019 documentary Revealing Ukraine (available on YT) to see what plans Medvechuk had for his country
    1
  26014. China prioritize saving lives at the expense of business. Whereas the West prioritize saving businesses at the expense of lives.
    1
  26015.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou China should have done it a long time ago." Why the rush? China is taking necessary precautions in order to ensure that the omicron variant does not run rampant throughout our country. And the rapidly increasing daily case count can be counted through tracing and lock downs.
    1
  26016.  @MarkYeung1  The United States has given up on lock downs, but as a result, the U.S has the world's highest number of covid deaths, are you saying China should just rush into removing all precautions, which would cause the number of cases in China to surge even higher?
    1
  26017.  @MarkYeung1  Many in Hong Kong (but not all) are still suffering from the aftereffects of colonialism, such as the "Colonized Mentality" where they blindly worship Anglo-Saxon culture and harbor a disdain for anything non-white. Even though Hong Kong has since physically decolonized, the "decolonization of the mind" needs to happen in order the heal the mental damage that colonizer inflicts on the colonized.
    1
  26018.  @MarkYeung1  Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  26019.  @jensensean7118  The Chinese Civil War can only end with the eventual reunification of Taiwan island with the mainland. The mainland is aiming for the peaceful reunification although the military option is not ruled out.
    1
  26020.  @loksky7583  Some Filipinos (but not all) retain the "colonial mentality" of worshiping Anglo-Saxon culture, while harboring disdain for any "non-white" culture (including their own). After all, Philippines was once previously an American colony, but even after decolonization, the "decolonization of the mind" still needs to happen to heal the mental damage inflicted by the colonizer on the minds on the colonized.
    1
  26021. Western democracies like Germany, France, USA, etc, have produced such incompetent leaders, many of whom aren't even popular among their own people given their low approvals. Whereas surveys in Russia and China have shown high approvals of President Putin and President Xi among Russians and Chinese respectively. It's apparent which political system is doing well and which is doing badly.
    1
  26022. It is clear that imposing sanctions does not work against North Korea, so why push N. Korea over the edge? Remember that this is nuclear capable state that we are dealing with here, so China does not want drive N. Korea into a corner. If war breaks out in Asia, it will be Chinese, Japanese and Koreans that suffer the consequences here in East Asia, not so much Americans, who are still mainly at at the other side of the globe.
    1
  26023.  @MarkYeung1  By "business pressure", you're literally advocating for China to stop doing business with Russia. You even use sanctions as an example, so aren't you clearly asking for China to stop doing business with Russia like the West does? Also, China and Russia enjoy friendlier relations as compared to China and Australia. Why should China jeopardize our relation with Russia through sanctioning? And yet when India doesn't sanction Russia nor do they call out Russia's special military operation, you look the other way but you single out China?
    1
  26024.  @MarkYeung1  "CHINA is the largest trading partner of Russia. CHINA is also the largest trading partner of Australia." So? China is also the largest trading partner of Ukraine, are you saying China should apply so-called "business pressure" on Ukraine in order to end the conflict?
    1
  26025.  @MarkYeung1  "China can persuade Ukraine to head to peace talk with Russia." But the United States won't allow Zelenskyy to sue for peace. In fact, United States has outwardly stated that they opposed China's 12 point peace process. Even till today, the U.S continues to send military aid to Ukraine, so isn't USA supporting war by doing so?
    1
  26026.  @yslee1401  Yet look at how far ahead China is of India in various fields, despite both having the largest populations on the planet. China has an adult literacy rate of 99%, while India's is 76%. China's infrastructure is excellent compared to that of India's, and China is home to the world's largest high-speed railway network. China has even sent people into space with Yang Liwei being the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program on board the Shenzhou-5 spacecraft. This makes China the third country to independently send humans into space, after USA and the Soviet Union.
    1
  26027.  @MarkYeung1  Who forced China's hand? We all saw how the 2019 Hong Kong riots virtually destroyed Hong Kong's economy, spooked investors to take their investments out of Hong Kong. Shopkeepers were afraid to open because of the riots, unlucky stalls were broken into, looted and burned, and you expect the mainland to tolerate this and allow the HK riots to continue for more than a year? Even when Carrie Lam cancelled the extradition bill, the Hong Kong rioters weren't satisfied and continued without end in sight, it's actually thanks to the Hong Kong National Security Law that peace is finally restored to the Hong Kong and the business and economy can begin recovering.
    1
  26028.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou What was the last time Beijing DEFENDED Hong Kong's freedoms which were promised by the Basic law?" What promise has Beijing failed to fulfil? Are you referring to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 45 (香港基本法第四十五條)? It says that: "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be *appointed by the Central People's Government*." So while Hong Kong holds elections for their Chief Executive, the Central People's Government (aka Beijing) reserves the right to appoint HK Chief Executive as per Hong Kong Basic Law. The second part of Article 45 reads: "The method for selecting the Chief Executive shall be specified in the light of the actual situation in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and in accordance with the principle of gradual and orderly progress" So if the situation in Hong Kong changed (as it has in 2019) then Beijing reserves the right to change Hong Kong's method for selecting the Chief Executive. As per Hong Kong Basic Law.
    1
  26029.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou CAN I DEFEND CHINA IF CHINA OPENLY trash the Basic law?" Please explain which part of Hong Kong Basic Law that Beijing allegedly "trashed".
    1
  26030.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "without apology or compensation to the victims?" Most of China has since acknowledged Cultural Revolution and moved on from it. Even some former Red Guards have come out and apologise for it. Source: Chinese Red Guards Apologize, Reopening A Dark Chapter cpr.org/2014/02/04/chinese-red-guards-apologize-reopening-a-dark-chapter/
    1
  26031.  @MarkYeung1  The man on the 100 Yuan bill is already dead, how'd you expect an apology from a dead person, you tell me? Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years, so which country would mock their founding father?
    1
  26032.  @MarkYeung1  Canada has genocide of indigenous aboriginals children and the atrocities were covered up by schools as the children were buried in unmarked graves and forgotten until today. Video: Canada's cultural genocide of indigenous people youtu.be/hie3vf3Ofws
    1
  26033. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26034. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  26035. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26036. Even the USA acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26037. Even the United States of American acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26038. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26039. Even Joe Biden agrees that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26040. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China....
    1
  26041. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26042. Even India acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26043. China builds infrastructure. The U.S destroys infrastructure.
    1
  26044. Why people keep saying it sounds like "She"? The Xi 习 in Xi Jinping 习近平 is pronounced closer to "C" or "See"
    1
  26045.  @zenithovzenith4840  What makes you think Russia will help Mongolia reclaim Inner Mongolia? Why would Russia attack its largest trading partner, China, just to help Mongolia reclaim Inner Mongolia? What has Mongolia even got to offer Russia?
    1
  26046.  @zenithovzenith4840  Mongolia was once a historical empire, but today its is sandwiched between Russia and China, so what makes you think Russia will help Mongolia reclaim Inner Mongolia and jeopardise its trading relations with China?
    1
  26047.  @zenithovzenith4840  What did Mongolia do for Russia? Look at the new Siberian-China Gas Pipeline (Power of Siberia Сила Сибири, 中俄东线天然气管道) built for Russia to supply China with natural gas. You think Russia wants to wage war with China over a plot of land in Inner Mongolia, just for Mongolia's sake? For what?
    1
  26048.  @zenithovzenith4840  Look at Mongolia's army compared to China's People's Liberation Army (world's largest land army). Take tanks for example and China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank has commanded healthy respect from international observers, as its performance parameters are equal to many top Western designs (like the Russian T-90 and the US M1 Abrams), and the Type 99 also packs a few unique tricks of its own. Source: China's Deadly Type 99 Tank vs. Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/chinas-deadly-type-99-tank-vs-russias-t-90-americas-m-1-17836 China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank was even featured in our 70th anniversary National Day parade. Video: China's new generation main battlefield tanks revealed in National Day Parade youtu.be/Ec4Bu2orKTk
    1
  26049.  @zenithovzenith4840  Calvary? China's Type 99 or ZTZ-99 is 3rd generation battle tank that is ranked among the World's Top 10 Main Battle Tanks, with advanced features including: -a fully stabilised smoothbore gun with autoloader, capable of firing anti-tank sniper missiles, and speculated to be able to penetrate the armour of the US M1 Abrams at close range with tungsten rounds. -Composite armour hull with front portion and turret protected by explosive reactive armour that resist enemy shell penetration. -A multi-layered radar system that detects and denotates incoming enemy missiles before impact. -A laser warning receiver that warns the tank commander that the tank is being painted by hostile lasers. Source: China showcases Type 99 Battle Tank youtu.be/ktniek01Xyw Source: Top 10 Most Powerful Tanks youtu.be/M3n6q_dTjfk?t=385 And its up there with the fastest to boot, equipped with turbo-charged engine providing a maximum road speed of 50 mph (80 kph).
    1
  26050.  @zenithovzenith4840  Besides our tanks, China also have advanced artillery, like the PLZ-05 (PLZ-52) self-propelled howitzer that is ranked among the Top 5 Self-propelled Howitzers in the world. Video: Top 10 Self Propelled Howitzers in the world 2017-2020 youtu.be/AQBcIRwg2fg?t=474 The PLZ-05 is capable of firing a full range of Chinese 155 munitions and having maximum range of fire of 30km (with standard projectiles) and 39km (with rocket-assisted projectiles) the PLZ-05 armour protects against small arms fire and artillery shell splinters. Maximum rate of fire is about 8-10 rounds per minute and on board ammunition supply is about 30 rounds. Powered with 8V51-Cooled Turbocharged Diesel, it can produce an output of 800 horsepower with a maximum road speed of 55 kmph and can achieve a maximum cruising range of 550 km. Video: 10 Most Powerful Howitzer in the World (2019) | Most Effective Tracked Artillery Systems youtu.be/V4UpNJi0HeY?t=360
    1
  26051.  mark robertson  How is my country, China, a problem?
    1
  26052.  mark robertson  As the world's most populous country, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  26053.  mark robertson  Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA. The test is given every three years to 15-year-olds around the world and measures their knowledge in reading, science and mathematics. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    1
  26054.  @GM6.7  China runs a business, not a charity drive, and of course Chinese companies expect returns on investment. Chinese banks are investing huge sums developing countries with unstable government and possible civil unrest so of course they have to calculate the risks involved. But like I said, no one is pointing a gun at those countries and forcing anyone to do business with China if they don't want to. China is willing to do business with countries that want our business. As for American businesses in China, nobody is forcing American companies to set up shop in China. You want access to Chinese Market, then your company should abide by Chinese laws while in China, and if you don't like our laws, please feel free to take your business elsewhere. Our country, our rules.
    1
  26055. ​ @GM6.7  Its because China has an excellent business infrastructure, and the Chinese market is enticing for USA to enter. You may take American companies elsewhere, but you're not going to find the same business infrastructure (roads, railways, highways, bridges, powerstations, factories, etc) as you will in China. Even online, China dominates with the world's largest E-commerce industry and that's why American companies want to set up shop in China. China Tech Startups: China is largest e-commerce market in the world Video: youtube(dot)com/watch?v=fVZl5GOVYpk You won't find these characteristics of China's market elsewhere in the world.
    1
  26056.  @GM6.7  The United State isn't really all that uninterested in investing in less-developed countries in Africa. For example, there are many African countries seeking loans from Western banks like IMF, but because of human rights violations or civil unrest, IMF does not grant loans to these countries, which is one reason why they seek out Chinese loans from Chinese banks. You literally had to chance to invest in them, but choose not to, and China has taken up the slack here.
    1
  26057.  Johnny Dominguez  Frankly speaking, if the machine can do the job better than humans, then what's wrong with using machines instead of people? China is no stranger to embracing technology, look at China's massive surveillance system and advanced facial recognition software for example. It has helped Chinese law enforcement in many ways as I will explain here: China has world's largest population, so its very difficult for law enforcement to maintain order. China faces a shortage of police officers as compared to other countries; China has only 115 police officers per 100,000 people, which is below the global median of 300 officers per 100,000 people. So China uses massive surveillance and advanced facial recognition software to make up for the shortfall in police officers in China. Source: Wikipedia: List of countries and dependencies by number of police officers But your biased anti-China Western propaganda is going to give it a negative spin about some "dystopian" scenario, when thanks to this system, crime rates in China have gone down and people are safer in most Chinese streets than even some Western countries. If the technology can do the work of humans, then what's wrong with making use of technology then?
    1
  26058.  Johnny Dominguez  About the Chinese male population, there are ways to solve the shortage of women in China. For example, Chinese men can also import Vietnamese brides for prices of 20,000 yuan ($3,200) in order to get married and produce kids. Here is one such source: Rural Chinese Men Are Buying Vietnamese Brides For $3,200 Source: businessinsider(dot)com/rural-chinese-men-are-buying-vietnamese-brides-for-3200-2014-8/?IR=T There are always solutions to such problems and just because China has shortage of women, doesn't automatically mean its the end of the world.
    1
  26059.  @sunnyinmilkyway2114  You claim Taiwan is independent country then why Taiwan cannot join the United Nations or the World Health Organization?
    1
  26060.  @freetibet8140  Since you claim Taiwan is like the United States breaking free from Britain, then where's Taiwan's formal declaration of independence? Who signed it and when was it signed?
    1
  26061. In China, the government controls corporations. In America, corporations control the government.
    1
  26062.  @digreziapartners2148  "神州 Shenzhou can Chinese point out the difference between south and North Dakota? I don’t think so" That's a far cry from Americans on the street being unable to Name a Country, (Any Country, even their own!) on the world map. Ask Americans whether they can even point out Taiwan on the World Map, and some might even confuse it with Thailand or some other ASEAN country.
    1
  26063.  @digreziapartners2148  "神州 Shenzhou interesting. Why don't you try the same Test with Chinese people and See the difference?" It has been done before by Asian Boss and at least the people interviewed seem to fare better. Video: How Much Do The Chinese Know About The World? youtu.be/SGk4ME67dLU
    1
  26064.  @digreziapartners2148  "What is the quota of these different ethnicities in the Chinese Parliament..." The ethnic minority quotas correspond to the percentage of ethnic minorities in China (around 8%). There are ethnic minority politicians in the Chinese government, such as: - Losang Gyaltsen (Tibetan: བློ་བཟང་རྒྱལ་མཚན,) President of Tibet Autonomous Region People's Congress Standing Committee, and former Chairman (governor) of Tibet Autonomous Regio - Padma Choling (Tibetan: པདྨ་འཕྲིན་ལས་) the eighth chairman of the Tibet Autonomous Region - Shewket Imin (Uighur: شەۋكەت ئىمىن‎) chairman of the Standing Committee of the People's Congress of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region - Neyim Yasin (Uighur: نەيىم ياسىن‎) vice chairperson of the National People's Congress Ethnic Affairs Committee. - Nurlan Abelmanjen (Kazakh: نۇرلان ٴابىلماجىن ۇلى ) currently serving as chairman of the Xinjiang Regional Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference. .... There are of course, many more ethnic minorities serving in the Chinese Parliament, but I can't possibly name all of them.
    1
  26065.  @PebblesWhiskey  Does your mom know that Taiwan was at it's most prosperous under the authoritarian single-party KMT rule? Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party KMT rule for more than half its life. For decades the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist and Chiang kai-shek was a dictator who jailed and executed dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and imposed martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan actually flourished and prospered, in what's known as the Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹). Between 1952 - 1982, Taiwan's economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 - 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 - 1986. The percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 - 1986. And its all been achieved under KMT leadership. Only in the late 1990s, when democracy was introduced (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest. Since then, Taiwan's economy has stagnated, wages are stagnant, cost of living is rising, unemployment is rising and Taiwan graduates are increasingly seeking jobs abroad, such as in Singapore or mainland China.
    1
  26066.  @stopwarstop7334  If you claim Taiwan is legally not part of the People's Republic of China, then why is it Taiwan cannot join the United Nations? Shouldn't Taiwan be able to join the UN since you claim it's legally not part of the PRC?
    1
  26067.  @stopwarstop7334  Taiwan don't even have sovereignty over what name to use at the Olympics, they have to go by "Chinese Taipei" that already shows Taiwan is not independent. Look, even just recently the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua choose to recognise Beijing over Taipei.
    1
  26068.  @stopwarstop7334  If you read the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 constitution, then Taiwan is part the PRC, just like how the Republic of China 🇹🇼 claims all of mainland China as part of their territory. Since Taiwan can claim the mainland, then the mainland can claim Taiwan as well.
    1
  26069.  @stopwarstop7334  The People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 constitution represents 1.4 billion people, and PRC is member of the United Nations, unlike the Republic of China 🇹🇼 which represents 23 million in comparison, then who cares about ROC constitution? China is the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, being world's 3rd largest weapons exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and China today has strong global presence as well as being an influential player of world politics. Whereas Taiwan's economy is ranked 23rd in the world, their manufacturing jobs have been virtually all but outsourced to the mainland ('Made in Taiwan' used to be commonplace, now its been largely replaced by 'Made in China') Taiwan has failed to deliver on their promise to someday retake the mainland and it relies on US weapon imports. Worst of all, Taiwan has hardly any global presence, it's merely a pawn on the chessboard between world powers.
    1
  26070.  @stopwarstop7334  "神州 Shenzhou as said anybody can claim anything in their constitution but it's up to reality." But the reality is that Taiwan is not a UN member, so it lacks recognition for its cause, and it's only a matter of time before Taiwan will inevitably reunify with the mainland. Because of reasons I mentioned earlier, Taiwan's perceived backing from the U.S would evaporate once the U.S declines to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise. Time is on China's side, the mainland can be as patient as necessary in order to reunify Taiwan with the mainland. Futhermore, you often boasted that Taiwan is a democracy, that means the people's perceptions can change with time. The current DPP is popular, but they might become unpopular in the future if DPP continually push for independence, and they might get replaced with a more pro-reunification party perhaps someday in the future. Who knows? You can't predict Taiwan policy given that Taiwan government will change now and then. But the mainland policy remains committed to reunification of Taiwan with the mainland, so are you sure ROC can afford to wait forever? More likely it's the PRC that can wait forever.
    1
  26071.  @stopwarstop7334  "神州 Shenzhou if you are a democratic then you must support ROC as ruler because ROC is democratic and PRC is communist." Then why is Ma Ying Jeou pro-reunification in his stance, even though he was elected in Taiwan? This shows that even democratic Taiwan can elect a pro-reunification leader like Ma. So eventually with after so many coin tosses, Taiwan might just elect another pro-reunification leader in the future, so reunification is inevitable. You said: "Go tell your xi ping pong to change PRC back to ROC quick if you looking for reunification." Again, the ROC lose the mainland to the PRC, then why should PRC change back to ROC? I've already shown that time is on PRC's side, eventually Taiwan's perceived backing by the US will wane until the U.S is no longer able to challenge China's rise any more, and that's when reunification is inevitable. You said: "But sorry to say the young people in Taiwan don't want unification even if PRC becomes democratic." Again, people's feelings can change over time, so you can't say for sure what the young people in Taiwan will feel like in the future. It's a gamble, a coin toss like I said, every time Taiwan votes. Even you can't be sure of what the people of Taiwan are going to feel in the future.
    1
  26072.  @stopwarstop7334  Ma Ying Jeou is an example of a pro-reunification president getting elected by the people of Taiwan. Also since you claim Ma Ying Jeou flirted with reunification, then who knows, the next coin toss might have a candidate that's even more pro-reunification than Ma in the future. And given that USA will eventually decline to become unable to challenge mainland China's rise, Taiwan will eventually have to consider reunification once their perceived US backing is gone. Actually it's KMT that needs to talk with the CPC, because that's where they draw their support for reunification from. Right now with DPP in power, there's literally zero dialogue between Tsai Ingwen's DPP and the CPC (which really only harms Taiwan over time) so who really needs to talk here?
    1
  26073.  @stopwarstop7334 Like I already stated many times, the people's feelings can change and they might elect a pro-reunification president in the next coin toss, or the one after that, and so on. President Ma is one example and there are bound to be more of such pro-reunification presidents in the future, it happened once, it can happen again.
    1
  26074.  @stopwarstop7334  Taiwan's people feelings towards the mainland can change, once their perceive support from the U.S evaporates, as U.S declines to the point where they can no longer afford to challenge China's rise. I've already told you, each Taiwan election is like a coin toss, you may get a series of heads, but you'll eventually going to end up with a tails one day.
    1
  26075.  @stopwarstop7334  Japan is bound by WWII surrender treaty (Article 9 of the Japanese constitution) to never declare war against another country, except for in self-defence. Also under the treaty, Japan is only allowed to maintain a self-defence army at all times, instead of maintaining armed forces with war potential. The thing is that this constitution was imposed by the United States onto Japan, so what makes you think Japan would even be able to go to war with mainland China over Taiwan's sake? You think too highly of Japan and Taiwan island.
    1
  26076.  @stopwarstop7334  You'll also need to remember that Taiwan is part of the People's Republic of China, and is recognized as such by many major countries in the UN.
    1
  26077.  @stopwarstop7334  But Taiwan's constitution isn't even recognized by most countries in the world, whereas most of the world recognizes PRC as China. And Taiwan is not even a member of the UN, whereas PRC is a UN member, so when the UN countries recognize Taiwan is a part of China, that means Taiwan is part of the PRC. Even according to the 1972 Shanghai Communique, the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is part of China, and does not challenge this position.
    1
  26078.  @catmandu6776  There's nothing fundamentally wrong with the character Winnie The Pooh. But by comparing President Xi Jinping, an Asian man, to a yellow-tone cartoon bear with small eyes, it becomes a racist caricature. It's like comparing Obama to King Kong or some other ape. Also, the Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According to Gregory Clark, all verified eyewitness present inside Tiananmen Square on June 1989 say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. .. Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies (By Gregory Clark)
    1
  26079. Its a classic Chinese Fire Drill, that's why she asked "How many seats?" (I'm joking of course...)
    1
  26080.  @HughJazz13  According to several eyewitness in Tiananman Square June 1989, nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053
    1
  26081.  @MarkYeung1  Earlier you said: "unless Beijing is willing to compromise (like Deng when he dealt with Hong Kong and the 1 country 2 systems)" but that is precisely what Beijing did by offering to extend the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy to include Taiwan. But Taiwan rejected Beijing's offer, without offering a counter-proposal of their own, then who is the one unwilling to compromise here? If you as Taiwan reject the mainland's offer, then what is your proposed solution then, if you are unwilling to compromise?
    1
  26082.  @tedtoews9889  Exactly. This @mark yeung guy expects Beijing to compromise (which they did by offering 1 country, 2 systems to Taiwan) yet now he says Taiwan is right not to compromise with the mainland.
    1
  26083.  @patricksmith1626  If according to you, that Cyrus is somehow being paid by the Communist Party of China, to promote the peaceful message of "Building Bridges, Not Walls" and to promote cooperation, not confrontation, then honestly speaking, isn't that a good thing in itself? That the CPC sponsor such a peaceful message?
    1
  26084.  @MarkYeung1  China has announced espionage charges against the 2 Canadians, trials were held and now the verdict is pending. But what crime did Meng Wanzhou even commit that Canada had to detain her? Even former US President Trump publicly stated that USA is willing to use Meng's arrest as a "bargaining chip" over China, this shows that USA doesn't really care about what crime Meng Wanzhou allegedly commited if they are willing to let her go. Even the new Biden administration hasn't uttered a word regarding Meng's arrest to Trudeu, so why does Canada continue to maintain this stalemate? USA just arrest Meng in order to strike an economic blow against Huawei and wound Chinese national pride that's all, and Canada is accomplice to this.
    1
  26085.  @viper2148  The Iraq War was illegal, even then UN secretary Kofi Annan said that the Iraq War violated UN charter. Source: Iraq war was illegal and breached UN charter, says Annan theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/16/iraq.iraq So what fairy tales are you talking about?
    1
  26086.  @MarkYeung1  From September to December 2018, Meng traveled to France, Britain, Ireland, Poland, Singapore, Japan and Belgium. All those 7 countries have an extradition treaty with the US, but Canada was the only one that helped the U.S. government in this kind of dirty game. Dozens of countries were requested by the United States to detain Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou, but Canada was the only one that responded to the request. Source: Canada the only country willing to detain Huawei CFO: Chinese diplomat news.cgtn.com/news/2020-09-05/Canada-the-only-country-willing-to-detain-Huawei-CFO-Chinese-diplomat-TxrPEnTnUs/index.html A total of 111 countries have signed extradition treaties with the U.S., and dozens among them received extradition requests, "but none of them followed this ridiculous idea, until Meng entered Canada. So it doesn't mean that just because Canada have an extradition treaty, that they are obliged to carry out extradition on US request. Because 7 other countries that have an extradition treaty with USA and that Meng visited, didn't cave in to the US demands.
    1
  26087.  @viper2148  Kofi Annan was the UN Secretary General and he said that the Iraq War violated UN charter. You can't refute my point so you just discredit him that's all.
    1
  26088.  @viper2148  The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Source: Seventeen Point Agreement wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet, so how's it illegal? Even countries all over the world today recognise Tibet as part of China, what are you talking about?
    1
  26089.  @MarkYeung1  Since Canada started this whole mess with China by arresting Meng Wanzhou, then Canada should first release Meng and put her on the first flight back to China, if they want to China to consider releasing the two Canadians. Canada started this stalemate, they know how to end it. Secondly, did you read what I said that from September to December 2018, Meng traveled to France, Britain, Ireland, Poland, Singapore, Japan and Belgium. All those 7 countries have an extradition treaty with the US, but Canada was the only one that helped the U.S. government in this kind of dirty game. So it doesn't mean that just because Canada have an extradition treaty, that they are obliged to carry out extradition on US request. Because 7 other countries that have an extradition treaty with USA and that Meng visited, didn't cave in to the US demands.
    1
  26090.  @viper2148  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CPC, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    1
  26091.  @MarkYeung1  China will most likely put it into consideration, but is under no obligation to release the 2 Canadians.
    1
  26092. 世上没有从天而降的英雄，只有挺身而出的凡人。
    1
  26093. Many people have similarly accused me of being brainwashed or a communist party shill, just for voicing positive achievements of my country, China.
    1
  26094. Self-improvement is China's reaction to competition. Sanctioning the competition is US's reaction.
    1
  26095. China Uncensored is extremely biased against China and usually spouts anti-Chinese government propaganda
    1
  26096. BRICS is facilitating the transition towards a multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, instead of the unipolar world dominated by a single voice (namely that of the US and its "allies.")
    1
  26097. Zelenskyy is going to lose his billion dollar allowance once the Trump administration takes over.
    1
  26098.  @SeadogHAL-3  China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history, so what makes you think the world didn't know China existed? And what do you mean by not much trading? Haven't you heard of the Silk Road, where Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, porcelain (aka fine china) were traded with nations in the West?
    1
  26099.  @SeadogHAL-3  "Have you Nations traded with them, L the whole idea behind Columbus's Voyage was to get to China." Actually, the original objective of Columbus' voyage was to get to India (that's why the Native Americans were mistakenly called Indians). Still, the West knew of China and traded through the Silk Road, Columbus' voyage was to find a maritime trade route as an alternative to overland trade route.
    1
  26100.  @SeadogHAL-3  You said: "The Chinese are great people but all of their leaders have been tyrannical maniacs." Throughout it's 5,000 years of history, China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  26101.  @SeadogHAL-3  "神州 Shenzhou The black plague came from China. They are really good at exporting." The origin of the Black Death is disputed. The pandemic originated either in Central Asia or East Asia but its first definitive appearance was in Crimea in 1347. And Chinese luxury goods like silk, tea, porcelain were sought after by the West. Noodles was observed by Marco Polo while in China, and this has been the suggested origin of spaghetti.
    1
  26102.  @SeadogHAL-3  Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  26103.  @SeadogHAL-3  "神州 Shenzhou I was in Hong Kong when it was free, and the only people that like the present-day China, belong to the Communist Party." Because Hong Kong's education system still follows the old British colonial system, which is designed to foster a "colonial mentality" among British colonies, and many in Hong Kong (but not all) still suffer from this colonial mindset. Even though Britain has physically decolonized from Hong Kong since 1997, the "decolonization of the mind" is still ongoing in Hong Kong. Otherwise, the colonial mindset of former colonies will only seek to serve to their former colonial master's interests
    1
  26104.  @SeadogHAL-3  "神州 Shenzhou It's not disputed by anyone but China.. ( the Black Plague)" According to Wikipedia: Black Death it literally says that: "The origin of the Black Death is disputed. The pandemic originated either in Central Asia or East Asia but its first definitive appearance was in Crimea in 1347." yet why are you jumping to conclusions and labeling China as the origin?
    1
  26105.  @SeadogHAL-3  "神州 Shenzhou That sounds more like an indoctrinated opinion rather than educated one. The irony of that statement you made.." Indoctrinated? You're the one claiming "神州 Shenzhou It's not disputed by anyone but China.. ( the Black Plague)" but you offered nothing to support your argument, you just make assumptions about China that you cannot proof. If anything, aren't you being ironic by assuming China is the origin of the Black Plague? Almost as if you've been indoctrinated to believe so badly about China? You said: "You used an indoctrinated opinion to explain a people being indoctrinated." Do you actually have evidence that my opinion is "indoctrinated"? Previously before 1997, Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy while it was a British colony and there were no elections held by the local people to elect their leaders. Only during the period of Hong Kong's return to the mainland, did the people of Hong Kong finally get to vote fore their favorite leaders. So isn't it thanks to the mainland that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems policy, when they had none before? For 150 years as a British colony? You said: "( and you speak like a Chinese professor, good loyal party member with his "own" opinion)" Is there something wrong with the way I speak? Are you now resorting to mocking my English proficiency because you are unable to refute my points?
    1
  26106.  @SeadogHAL-3  Then why'd you bring up that I speak like a Chinese professor? Can you actually prove that the content of my speech is "indoctrinated" as you labelled it? And again about the Black Death, I literally pointed out how it's origins are disputed, yet you just jump to conclusions that it originated in China without actual proof. You said: "The Chinese people here in America don't speak very highly of the Communist Party." That's because they've been brought up under American system to hate their motherland. But China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it sounds like the US is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  26107.  @SeadogHAL-3  Then why'd you bring up that I speak like a Chinese professor? Can you actually prove that the content of my speech is "indoctrinated" as you labelled it? And again about the Black Death, I literally pointed out how it's origins are disputed, yet you just jump to conclusions that it originated in China without actual proof.
    1
  26108.  @SeadogHAL-3  Then why'd you bring up that I speak like a Chinese professor? Can you actually prove that the content of my speech is "indoctrinated" as you labelled it? And again about the Black Death, I literally pointed out how it's origins are disputed, yet you just jump to conclusions that it originated in China without actual proof. You said: "The Chinese people here in America don't speak very highly of the Communist Party." Many American-born Chinese have been brought up without ever setting foot in their homeland, so all they have are stories by their parents as well as American media's negative portrayal of our country, so some of them developed a unnatural hatred towards the Communist Party of China. Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  26109.  @SeadogHAL-3  You said: "The Chinese people here in America don't speak very highly of the Communist Party." Many American-born Chinese have been brought up without ever setting foot in their homeland, so all they have are stories by their parents as well as American media's negative portrayal of our country, so some of them developed a unnatural hatred towards the Communist Party of China. Previously, China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, but today, China has since transformed into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  26110.  @rpg1663  It's a breakthrough for DUV to produce 7 nm chips. The U.S is controlling the sales of lithography machines left and right, so this development using DUV is breaking through the U.S sanctions and allowing other countries to make 7 nm chips even if restrained by U.S sanctions.
    1
  26111.  @rpg1663  "神州 Shenzhou Yes, in theory we're reaching the limit when it comes to silicon based." So the question is what happens once we reached the limit for silicon-based chips and are unable to make nano transistors any smaller? If alternatives like the carbon-based chips become successful, and are able to replace silicon chips, then it renders all those EUV lithography machines worthless since carbon-based chips require a different form of manufacture and assembly. China would then be free of all those sanctions the U.S placed on lithography machines and the investment into mass-producing carbon chips by China would pay off.
    1
  26112.  @rpg1663  Like you said, carbon based chips have been around since 2013, but it took a huge population country like China to have a breakthrough in perfecting the process for large scale industrial application in 2020. This shows that an old technology can be lying around dormant for some time, yet after a while, another country makes a breakthrough in this field. So you can't just simply write off old technology after it hasn't borne results in while, there may be new discoveries in the future. You said: "I thought it was quite clear by now that having big population means nothing. Even having lots of PhD graduated every year in the best universities outside of China." As the world's most populous country, China has the most brainpower to come up with ideas, as well as the most manpower to turn those ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses and with a population about 4.3 times that of the United States, China has at least 4x the number of geniuses that the U.S have. This can be proven statistically. Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large Populations Have More Geniuses
    1
  26113. China is not the Democratic Republic of Congo, they are their own country and its up to themselves to solve their internal issues. China observes a policy of non-interference in other country's internal affairs.
    1
  26114. Georgia's President (who was born in France) has declared that the elections could not be recognized, and says she will not be stepping down from her position, claiming that she's doing it in the name of "democracy."
    1
  26115.  @baojhoang7242  There's an even simpler solution that will not start a war. Maintain the status quo as it was before Pelosi's visit, and the U.S learns not to unnecessarily disturb the status quo and cross China's red line.
    1
  26116.  @bigchef3394  "神州 Shenzhou yes but that extreme progress has desensitized personal rights and the individuality of the average man. in the name of progress traditions and family values were lost," What makes you think Chinese traditions and family values were lost? Chinese today celebrate Spring Festival (Chinese New Year), Lantern Festival, Qingming Festival, Dragon Boat Festival, Double Seventh (Chinese Valentine's Day) Festival, Mid-Autumn Festival, here are some videos of Chinese festivals: Video: Dragon Boat Races Celebrate China's Ancient Past | National Geographic youtu.be/YlPExNPyPwQ Video: Festive China: Lantern Festival youtu.be/kFQKWYGZNlE Video: 2021 Spring Festival Gala: Wushu – A revered part of Chinese culture youtu.be/LJ6ApvLnRGk
    1
  26117.  @bigchef3394  You said: "in this progress china has basically wiped out its population, with the 1 child policy the birth rate in china has fallen in .50" What do you mean wiped out our population? Why is China the country with the largest population in the world at estimated 1.4 billion of we wiped out our population? As for the 1 Child Policy, in the past China was still dirt-poor country, suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems at that time. Why allow families in China to raise multiple kids, only for them to starve to death, succumb to childhood diseases, and having not enough food, not enough hospitals, and not enough schools to send them all to? Why not make families focus all available resources into raising a single, healthy kid into adulthood, and get him into a good school? According to World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china Look at India, world's 2nd largest population country, and India is suffering from high birth rate, high child malnutrition, high child mortality, high illiteracy and other population problems that China once suffered from in the past.
    1
  26118. Rich developed countries are buying up and hoarding Covid-19 vaccines and leaving little-to-none for the poorer developing countries, even Canada hoarded enough vaccines for 5-8 times it's population. Imagine 1 Canadian having access to 5 Covid vaccines, whereas 10 Africans have to fight for access to 1 vaccine.
    1
  26119. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  26120. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  26121. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  26122. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26123. Countries all over the world recognize that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26124. Singapore hosts the US 7th Fleet, Task Force 73, which is is based in Singapore and it is it the origin of the US warships that sail to the South China Sea. US Aircraft carriers also visit Singapore before sailing to the South China Sea.
    1
  26125. ​ indiasuperclean6969  Congratulations to India's successful lunar landing.
    1
  26126.  indiasuperclean6969  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  26127.  @CyrusJanssen  Cyrus, you claimed in your earlier livestream that it's a "religious war", yet this Greek Orthodox Church (the oldest church in Gaza) had been targeted by Israel and is now in ruins.
    1
  26128. Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos do not follow the United States politically. Even Singapore has been under the authoritarian single-party PAP rule for 57 years, much like how China's been under CPC rule for 73 years.
    1
  26129. Vietnam is socialist republic under the communist party. Cambodia is constitutional monarchy with the king as the head of state. Laos is one-party parliamentary socialist republic where LPR Party reigns supreme. Singapore has been governed by a single party, the PAP for its entire life. Thailand is a constitutional monarchy, whereby a hereditary monarch is head of state. Malaysia is a constitutional monarchy, where the king is head of state.
    1
  26130.  @MarkYeung1  But those countries have a political system that's different from the United States, so how can you claim that they subscribe to the U.S politically?
    1
  26131.  @MarkYeung1  Many of these South East Asian countries also have China as their largest (or second largest) trading partners, and Cyrus' video has shown that Chinese companies plan to expand trade with South East Asia. Another point is that China doesn't force those countries to pick a side, unlike the U.S
    1
  26132.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou certainly. They picked United States by their own choices." Most of those want not to be involved in the geopolitical conflict between U.S and China, and China doesn't force them to pick a side, but it's the U.S that does that.
    1
  26133.  @MarkYeung1  "Don't know whether USA forces Taiwan to make choice." They do. The U.S Congressman Seth Moulton made a statement threatening to bom TMSC, then isn't it forcing Taiwan to make a choice here? How then can you claim that they picked United States by their own choices?
    1
  26134. China even proposed a 12-point plan to a peaceful resolution for the conflict in Ukraine. Russian President Putin has welcomed this move, while the U.S is opposed to the peace plan.
    1
  26135.  user-ol3ru2kf1c  Canadian PM Trudeu 🇨🇦 is literally hurling accusations against Indian government. Have you been living under a rock?
    1
  26136.  user-ol3ru2kf1c  Funny how you support Canada 🇨🇦 when Trudeu is literally demanding answer from Indian government over a Sikh leader's death.
    1
  26137. China don't want to hurt America, because like the government said, "Nobody wins in trade war". But that does not mean China will not retaliate with tariffs of our own, if President Trump wants to slap tariffs on China.
    1
  26138.  @fuemoua8345  That's right, USA did not claim the South China Sea, but why is USA sending US warships and aircraft carriers halfway across the globe to the SCS then? USA can claim Hawaii and Guam islands in the Pacific Ocean, so far away from the American mainland, then can't China claim SCS Islands that's right outside our backyard in comparison?
    1
  26139.  @fuemoua8345  About the South China Sea, the North Vietnam PM Phạm Văn Đồng had formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese in a diplomatic letter he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1958. Here is the note: wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. But after it was discovered that the region contain rich deposits of oil and gas, Vietnam suddenly changed its mind, broke their word and started claiming those territory as part of Vietnam. Why Vietnam politician can change their minds just like that?
    1
  26140.  @fuemoua8345  The more evil China becomes? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    1
  26141.  @fuemoua8345  About China's president for life, China has produced many 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, etc to map out China's future and direction in the years 2025, 2030, 2040, 2050. By abolishing the presidential term limits, our leaders can remain in power long term to see their plans for China bloom and come to fruition in the future. This is the advantage of China's long term leadership. Whereas in the United States, the US Presidents have to step down after 4-8 years because of presidential term limits, so they can only make short term plans for America's future, instead of long term plans spanning, say 10 years or more. This is the disadvantage of US short term leadership.
    1
  26142.  @fuemoua8345  What's wrong with having a long-term leader? Look at German Chancellor Angela Merkel being in power for so long, where most other Western leaders have since stepped down because of term limits. Since China's political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Because Westerners say so?
    1
  26143.  @dstr1  Why should I bring up infrastructure Western countries built in Africa? Can't you bring it up yourself? The West colonised Africa for 5 centuries and did little to develop African countries. On the other hand, the PRC established relations with Africa in the last 3-4 decades and already developed African countries to such an extent.
    1
  26144.  @fuemoua8345  "神州 Shenzhou have your XIJINPING call me" What's your phone number then so that I can get him to contact you? Please give me your contact details.
    1
  26145.  @dstr1  Why'd did you tell me to "Don't change the subject", yet here you are asking me to bring up infrastructure that Western countries built in Africa since they colonized it for 5 centuries now? Aren't you changing the subject yourself?
    1
  26146.  @fuemoua8345  You want President Xi Jinping to contact you then why don't you post your phone number here so that you can be contacted?
    1
  26147. One restaurant in Beijing is making use of wheat straws obtained from the countryside in central China, to replace plastic drinking straws. Video: Wheat straws: China's biodegradable alternative to plastic youtu.be/8tyK3FZviso They cost the same as plastic straws, are just as effective and completely biodegradable. And customers are supporting the move too.
    1
  26148. Why not? Beijing won the 2015 bid to host the Winter Olympics. In fact, Beijing is going to make Olympic history by being the first city to host both the Summer Olympics (2008) and Winter Olympics (2022).
    1
  26149.  @hiar579  So you don't have any evidence of your claims? Even CNN has stated that they can't independently verify this news, then why are you believing what they claim without proof? Peng Shuai has clearly appeared in video explaining that she wants her privacy to be respected, but Western MSM is trying to expose her private life for all the world to see (kinda like the paparazzi)
    1
  26150.  @juancarlosalonso5664  "神州 Shenzhou The fact that you’re defend the chinese government over your own people…" Can't I defend the Chinese government? The Chinese government has transformed China from a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into the world's 2nd largest economy today, the world's factory (Made-in-China) having world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd largest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  26151.  @mayankdewli1010  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  26152.  @stephennewby5060  "神州 Shenzhou what a moron....Chinese people are not free" What makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, before 2019, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. So what makes you think Chinese people aren't free? Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  26153.  @JCLIAO007  彭帅接受新加坡媒体《联合早报》采访，改口称「我从未说过或写过任何人性侵我」。她表示一直住在北京的家里，完全没有人监视。她也解释关于她上个月由CGTN发布给WTA首席执行官史蒂夫·西蒙的电子邮件是她所写，但因为她的英语水平不够，她将中文版内容交给CGTN翻译发布。
    1
  26154. Indeed. The U.S would no longer be able to print money to fund their insane military budget.
    1
  26155. China has helped India's neighbors like Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh to by investing and building infrastructure in those countries to help develop economies. But Indian media constantly portraying this as surrounding India that's all. China can already bypass India with CPEC reaching Gwadar port to grant access to Indian Ocean, but of course, India joining in OBOR will help prevent India from being isolated.
    1
  26156. +niknsync What makes you think that every infrastructure projects are debt traps? In South Africa, China has helped built roads, railroads, schools, hospitals, hotels, shopping centers, football stadiums and telecommunication projects to help develop their economy. So what makes you think CPEC will turn out to be debt trap at all? As for Sri Lanka, it should be noted that not every business transaction is going to be successful all the time. Chinese banks offered loans to Sri Lankan government to build infrastructure, and President Mahinda Rajapaksa borrowed too many loans, until Sri Lanka was unable to repay it all back. Nevertheless, leasing the port to Chinese companies for 99 years is to help ease Sri Lankan government from spending all its revenue repaying loans, and to allow it to spend its money elsewhere instead.
    1
  26157.  @fl338  "Why do so many of the pro PRC youtubers have their PRC wives and children change thier citizenship." Well, because they met their respective wives in the U.S/Canada? Their wives were probably studying/working in U.S/Canada and then they met their respective husbands, gotten married and applied for citizenship.
    1
  26158. @Sheriff Lobo Video: New technology in China turns desert into land rich with crops youtu.be/cazVrq9v1mE
    1
  26159. @Sheriff Lobo Chinese scientists have developed a method to convert sand to soil. The research team from Chongqing invented a paste made of plant cellulose that helps sand retain water, nutrients and air. The paste is non-toxic, environmentally friendly, cheap and suitable for mass production. Video: Chinese scientists turn sand into soil youtu.be/uj14tpyewkI The method has been used to turn a section of Ulan Buh Desert in Inner Mongolia into arable land. Crops, grass, shrubs and herbs have all grown well on the land
    1
  26160. 以后沙特再也不怕美国喽，沙特加油，中东加油。
    1
  26161.  @adrianbundy3249  Modern China was built by the sweat, blood, tears and sacrifice of the Chinese people and the communist government, to turn a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, into an economic juggernaut today, the world's factory (Made in China), a growing scientific and technological power, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army and having strong global presence, as well as being a potential rival to the USA. And its all achieved under CCP leadership.
    1
  26162.  @adrianbundy3249  "WITHOUT having to kill millions of people to do it (The Meiji miracle is but one)?" The Meiji Restoration occurred under authoritarian Japanese imperialistic rule, under the Japanese Emperor Meiji (the period was named after him) and he abolished the samurai classes (which represented a significant drain on Japan's resources) and many unhappy samurai revolted against that, resulting in a civil war by the emperor to kill off the remaining samurai classes. Did you watch The Last Samurai featuring Tom Cruise, in which a Westerner joins the last remaining samurai classes in a valiant battle against a rapidly modernizing Japanese military armed with guns and cannons?
    1
  26163.  @adrianbundy3249  Those people weren't killed by the CCP, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine, which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvests. Even Mao Zedong can't possibly control the weather isn't it? And it is people starving to death in a disaster, which is different from Emperor Meiji ordering the killing of the last remaining samurai, so what's your point? And China achieved transformation from dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country into an economic juggernaut and military power today WITHOUT adopting Western democracy, so isn't China better than Japan in this regard? Also, most of Japan's great modernization occurred under authoritarian Meiji emperor rule, instead of Western democracy, likewise, so did most of China's modernization occurred under authoritarian CCP rule. And look at Japan today, it used to be a strong military power during WWII period, but after the 1945 surrender treaty, Japanese military has been "castrated" and it is now bound to only maintain a "self-defense" force at all times. Whereas the People's Liberation Army is the world's largest land army, our Chinese navy is Asia's largest, and we even started building aircraft carriers. China currently has 1 aircraft carrier in operation, 1 undergoing sea trials and at least 2 more carriers undergoing construction in our shipyards. Video: First China-made aircraft carrier sets to serve youtube.com/watch?v=48Jce11rFac
    1
  26164.  @adrianbundy3249  "神州 Shenzhou First off, china took longer to due so" China has the world's largest population, so of course China had more people to lift out of poverty. But under Chinese leadership, China's population eventually doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, India, Europe and USA. Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country, similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China), the world's 3rd largest arms exporter, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure and having world's 2nd highest R&D spending. And its all been achieved under CCP leadership, without ever adopting Western democracy, so doesn't this show that not all countries have to achieve Western democracy to be successful, and China is living proof of this?
    1
  26165.  @adrianbundy3249  About Great Chinese Famine, in July 1959, the Yellow River flooded in East China and according to the Disaster Center, the flood directly killed, either through starvation from crop failure or drowning, an estimated 2 million people. Source: _The Most Deadly 100 Natural Disasters of the 20th Century_.disastercenter.com/disaster/TOP100K.html In 1960, an estimated 60% of agricultural land in northern China received no rain at all and the Encyclopædia Britannica yearbooks from 1958 to 1962 also reported abnormal weather, followed by droughts and floods based on Chinese government sources. This included 760 millimetres (30 in) of rain in Hong Kong across five days in June 1959, part of a pattern that hit all of Southern China. As a result, year over year grain production dropped in China. Japan's military is clearly "castrated" and no longer the military power it was during WWII. Japan is a dog of the United States, bound by WWII surrender treaty (Article 9 of the Japanese constitution) never to declare war on another country except in self-defense, and it is only allowed to maintain a self-defense force at all times, even more than 70 years after WWII . Even Germany, Japan's WWII ally, is not bound by such a restricting treaty, and Germany is allowed to grow its military to become as powerful as it wants. Imagine another 70 years into the future, and China's military have grown stronger, yet Japan is still stuck with maintaining a self-defense force, because of its WWII surrender treaty.
    1
  26166.  @adrianbundy3249  Singapore has been ruled by authoritarian single-party government for its entire life as a nation! For over 50 years, the PAP ruled Singapore with iron fist, and Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore's founder) was a tyrant who tolerated not dissent, and jailed or exile his political opponents. Singapore citizens face severe restrictions on their basic rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. (Now doesn't that sound just like China?) But under PAP's authoritarian dictatorship, Singapore transformed from a sleepy fishing village nation, into a world class country, busiest port in South East Asia, producing some of the world's most best graduates, and punching above its weight than its neighboring countries like Malaysia and Indonesia. It's because Singapore leaders have foresight and can make long-term plans for Singapore future, given their 50 years of PAP rule. Likewise, China has been under authoritarian single-party CCP rule for 70 years already. So how does your Western democracy, even play a role in whether a country is better or worst off?
    1
  26167. Virus mutation is random in nature, can strike anywhere, anytime, and is always evolving (as it has for billions of years). It's like a force of nature, like typhoon, earthquake or tsunami, so which world leader would apologise for an act of nature?
    1
  26168. When Soviet Union collapse, Westerners been expecting China to follow through for over 30 years, but obviously the revolution isn't coming.
    1
  26169.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "There are lots of barriers to American goods in China, including political barriers." If you're talking about protectionism, then the United States is the world's most protectionist country from 2008-2013 according to Global Trade Alert having taken over 800 protectionist measures during this period. The European Union had taken over 300 protectionist measures, whereas China only taken 200-300 of such measures in comparison over the same period. Source:https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Protectionism#Current_world_trends
    1
  26170.  @MarkYeung1  H&M and Nike were boycotted because they pledged to boycott Xinjiang cotton over unproven allegations of forced labour. Take clothing brand Sketchers for example, they conducted multiple audits on their cotton factories in Lu Zhou in 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020, both announced and unannounced, and that none of these audits revealed indications of the use of forced labor or other concerning labor conditions. Whereas H&M and Nike didn't even bother to conduct audits of their own and just made the pledge to boycott Xinjiang cotton over unproven allegations of forced labour.
    1
  26171. 懂得说英语也没用～这些洋喷子都不喜欢讲道理。
    1
  26172. Ukraine is not even a member of Nato, yet why are they sending military aid to a non-member?
    1
  26173. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  26174.  @gobbarsingh  Why did ROC 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to PRC 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the communists were at a severe disadvantage; they were mostly poorly trained peasants, their weapons were lousy, and they had far fewer numbers (only 50 communist members in 1921) over the Kuomintang. The KMT on the other hand, had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) they had superior weapons, better training, and far superior numbers over the the communists. Securing victory against the communists should have been a piece of cake for the KMT. Yet the communists survived all KMT attempts to wipe them out, employing strategies like "Long March" (长征) and despite KMT's initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan). This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland.
    1
  26175.  Reuel T  You're contradicting yourself, you said under Treaty of Shimonoseki, Taiwan was "ceded to Japan in PERPETUITY" and next you said "Taiwan residents gained independence from Japan." so what's the point of claiming perpetuity then? Taiwan may have gained independence from Japan but not from China. Go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims that all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) is part of their territory, even territory under the modern control of Mongolia, Burma, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a Map to illustrate my point. Source: Map of ROC Administration and Claims wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg
    1
  26176. @Ben Benito Like I said, the U.S printing dollars is like Wile. E Coyote chasing Road Runner off a cliff, and continues running on air even after the ground below him dissappears. The U.S Dollar is literally backed by nothing, so its only a matter of time before reality catches up to him and he begins to fall. Do you even understand the economics of the U.S continuing to print money here?
    1
  26177.  @s4shaik  Indeed. The problem occurs when people lose faith in the U.S Dollar.
    1
  26178.  Dark of the knight  WHO receives the most funding from the United States (according to 1:40 of the video) so how is WHO biased against China?
    1
  26179.  @xl5009  China contributed far less money to WHO than America, so how exactly is WHO a Chinese lapdog? WHO receives far more funding from USA than China.
    1
  26180.  @peterb5857  Where's your evidence that WHO leader gets $$$ under the table from China? USA contributes 400 million dollars to WHO whereas China only contributes about 40 million dollars to WHO, so how exactly is WHO China biased?
    1
  26181. If you're referring to "Where's Jack Ma?" it turns out he was on a cruise in Balearic waters off the coast of Spain. Peng Shuai is trying to lay low and avoid the public eye for a while until this all blows over, and she has expressed her desire for personal privacy during a video call with IOC. But the WTA is trying to pry into her personal affairs and demanding she appear in public and bare her private life for all the world to see.
    1
  26182.  @akif5638  Who are you?
    1
  26183. United States: "Where is Jack Ma? Where is Peng Shuai?" China: "Thank you for the concern over Chinese citizens but those two are fine and have appeared in public. Shouldn't you be concerned with your own missing American citizen Gonzalo Lira?"
    1
  26184. So is this possibly the first known human-to-animal transmission of the coronavirus?
    1
  26185.  @IdleForever9483  So many foreign companies come to China and set up shop here, and many of them require access to Western websites like Facebook, YouTube and Google to conduct business, so the government issue VPN license to these companies. So what makes you think VPN is illegal in China? Which person has been arrested for doing so?
    1
  26186.  @pointingoutpoints3661  Lots of Internet users have switched to VPN options for better online security and privacy. There are many advantages to using VPN, for example, you can get a better deal buying air tickets online, if you select a different country from your own.
    1
  26187.  @RC-cb8cp  The world outside? Chinese are free to travel overseas for work, study or play. I mean, Everyone has heard of Chinese tourists visiting your countries and spending money on your economies. Western schools and universities are positively flooded with Chinese international students, studying the same topics as their peers and Chinese investors are buying up property in your lands. Source: China has world's most outbound tourists nationmultimedia.com/detail/travel/30355861 Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more Chinese can be found virtually all over the globe today, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all.
    1
  26188. Isn't that how most parents are?
    1
  26189.  @alvinyang8677  Granted, the Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, Europe, USA and India. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  26190.  @ihateeveryjuan9943  Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap, so that inflation in America is kept to a minimum and the cost of living in America is lower than it should be. Think of the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses over the years thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent on other pursuits like cars, housing, luxury brands, school fees, doctor's fees, tuition fees and so on.
    1
  26191.  @possum456  So nobody has been arrested just for login into YouTube while in China? Then why do people claim YouTube is illegal in China?
    1
  26192.  @cooliipie  Why are you using the improper name for Covid-19? Look at all those racially-motivated attacks against Asian Americans (Asian Canadians, Asian Australians, Asian Europeans, etc) because American politicians like Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo choose to refer to the virus by it's improper name. Video: Asian Americans face discrimination in wake of the coronavirus youtu.be/t_IyTxRNUYk You are contributing to anti-Asian sentiment by using the improper name for Covid-19.
    1
  26193.  @possum456  But nobody has been arrested just for login into YouTube while in China, so why do people claim that it's illegal?
    1
  26194.  @possum456  Is there something wrong with me posting People's Liberation Army miltary drills on videos about Taiwan?
    1
  26195.  @Votingcenter  Pay fines? Have you heard of Chinese vlogger 李子柒 Liziqi YouTube channel has more than 2.7 billion views and 16 million subscribers, as verified on 21 August 2021, which is a Guinness World Record for "The most subscribers for a Chinese language channel on YouTube"? How much fines does she have to pay?
    1
  26196.  @Votingcenter  Here's one of Chinese vlogger Liziqi's video: Using bamboo to make some sophisticated old furniture——Bamboo Sofa youtu.be/LTejJnrzGPM
    1
  26197. Corruption is universal phenomenon and many governments in world, including USA, Russia, UK and China all have corruption. But current Chinese government is working to curb corruption and there have been many corruption crackdowns. But do other corrupted governments like USA and UK do anything about their corruption? For example, President Trump promised to reveal his tax details upon being elected to become president, but so far no he hasn't followed through on his promise. Also Hilary Clinton is probably just as corrupt, but nothing seems to be done about it.
    1
  26198. L C He may be doing that, but he is also targeting other high ranking corrupt communist party officials in the process. Who on this earth is altruistic enough to tackle corruption without some form of benefit to themselves? The fact that he is willing to take on the enormous task of purging corruption is already incredible feat in itself, especially one of world's largest political parties. The government has labor laws to protect our workers. Under chapter 4 Working Hours, Rests, and Leaves Article 36 The State shall practise a working hour system wherein labourers shall work for no more than 8 hours a day and no more than 44 hours a week on the average. Labour Law of the People's Republic of China china.org.cn/living_in_china/abc/2009-07/15/content_18140508.htm But of course, China is so populous that it is not possible to catch every employer who choose to work their people like slaves. Furthermore, China's labor force is so huge, that if you are unwilling to do the work, someone else will gladly take up your position, for lower pay and longer hours too. Such is the level of competition in Chinese workforce society today. Chinese workers may work in unforgiving conditions, but at least they were getting paid. What do you know about serfdom in Tibet? During Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was brutal theocracy, with 95% slaves and 5% slave owner, which are the Tibetan monks. Peasants worked the poor mountainous soil to grow food to feed the 5% but there was barely sufficient food and famine and starvation were commonplace. Torture, mutilation and skinning were common punishments and there is even Tibetan human drum (Skull Damaru) made from two skulls and with human skin. A drumstick is fashioned out of human legbone, usually a young serf girl. Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago when Mongolians conquered it and made it part of Yuan Dynasty China. Even Marco Polo acknowledged it in his book "Travels of Marco Polo" in which he wrote: "Tibet is a big land where people have their own language and idolatry. But all of their affairs are placed under the management of the Yuan Emperor," Marco Polo, first Westerner to say that Tibet is part of China ecns.cn/2017/06-22/262446.shtml Also from the source: In 1904, a British army journalist, Edmund Candler, gave the true nature of Tibetan society -- like the serfs during the middle ages of Europe and descibed Tibet as having "witnessed more murders and instigations to crime than the most blood-stained castle in medieval Europe." He said the monks are the overlords, the peasantry their serfs So I don't understand how you arrive at the conclusion that for the past 1000 years, Tibet was much more peaceful than China. Even Westerns have described the serfdom faced by Tibetans as quoted from the above source. You feel sorry for our education and in the same way Chinese people feel sorry for your education. You have the ability to choose your leaders, but Americans choose someone like Trump to leader the country, when he has zero political experience? And you are British, so your people choose to leave the European Union, based on a rather informal referendum? Every governing system have its own flaws, but if China's government can lead China to become world's 2nd largest economy, then I don't see why our system is inferior to Western democracy.
    1
  26199. +L C You mean you visit Tibet and China for short duration and suddenly, you know everything about "serfdom" in Tibet? There are various sources detailing serfdom in Tibet, including Western sources, and all of them agreed that some form of serfdom exists in Tibet. You Westerns still tend stubbornly cling on romanticized notions of Tibet as Paradise on Earth due to growing up under propaganda. You said: "One of the characteristics of slavery is being captive which did not happen in Tibet" and I think you must have confused "slavery" with "prisoners". Tibetan serfs were still being forced to work the fields to grow food to support Tibetan population, and being surrounded by mountains, there was literally nowhere else to escape. Who else is going to feed Tibetans themselves? The monks? Even in 2001, the Dalai Lama said: "Tibet, materially, is very, very backward. Spiritually it is quite rich. But spirituality can't fill our stomachs." People send their sons to the monastery, because they want better life for their children, instead of a harsh life out in the fields. Some Tibetans were nomadic, because the poor mountain soil meant rearing livestock like yaks were more feasible than growing crops. But they are still serfs having to rear animals to feed the population. Drepung monastery, on the outskirts of Lhasa, was one of the world's largest landowners with 185 manors, 25,000 serfs, 300 pastures, and 16,000 herdsmen. High-ranking lamas and secular landowners imposed crippling taxes, forced boys into monastic slavery and pilfered most of the country's wealth – torturing disobedient serfs by gouging out their eyes or severing their hamstrings. Source: theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/feb/10/tibet-china-feudalism How am I very wrong about Damaru? In ancient time, it was made from human crania or entirely out of human skulls, but today it usually made from wood or animal leather at both ends, according to following source. So its only recent times that it was made from other materials besides human skulls. In the past, Tibetans have "strong beliefs" so you think Tibetans would prefer to use Damaru made of normal materials instead of human skulls? Tibet Damaru exploretibet.com/blog/tibet-damaru/ Skinning of slaves applied to people of all ages, including women, children and toddlers. Also, since when does the sky burial ritual consists of skinning the cadaver at all? According to Wikipedia, there is no mention of skinning the cadaver before commencing the sky burial, so why are you claiming that its part of the ceremony for feeding the body to birds of prey? Tibetans believed in returning the entire body to the earth, including the skin, so what nonsense are you cooking up to explain Tibetan skinning? Wikipedia Sky Burial en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sky_burial Yuan Dynasty is a Chinese dynasty ruled by Mongolian leaders. It was Kublai Khan that choose to abandon his own culture and embrace Chinese culture instead, proclaiming himself emperor of Yuan Dynasty China. Mongolians were nomadic horsemen who don't grow their own food, so in the end, it was Chinese farmers who grew food to feed the empire. Mongolians don't know anything about how to run an empire, so Chinese bureaucrats were left to keep such a large empire running. So in what way is Yuan dynasty China not a Chinese Dynasty? Even after Yuan dynasty collapse, Ming emperors controlled Tibetan affairs from China. The title of Dalai Lama was actually bestowed onto Tibetan leaders by Ming emperors, the Prince of Shunyi, as a symbol of granting him the right to rule Tibet in his stead. Even if you discount Ming, Tibet was also part of Qing dynasty China isn't it? Who are you to come to China as exchange student only find our education system disappointing? China ranks 3rd in most popular international education destination and Ministry of Education reported a total of 442,773 international students were studying in China in 2016, so who are you to mock our system? As for ethnic minorities performance, you do know that China's population is 95% Han Chinese, so what are the odds of having top performing ethnic minority? Its just not realistic to expect ethnic minorities to consistently perform well in universities, given such a ethnic demographic. Ethnic minorities like Tibetans also enjoy special benefits like free education until university that Han Chinese do not get to enjoy. Tibetans and other ethnic minorities are also get tax exemptions, healthcare benefits, and educational bursaries. For example, if Han Chinese need 500 points to qualify for a university course, Tibetans and ethnic minorities only need 300 points (easier) to qualify for the same course. So in what way are ethnic minorities in China treated unfairly? Of course, majority of China is still Han Chinese, but what do you expect the government to do about Han Chinese majority? You despise Chinese education system, when our system has consistently produced students with among world's highest average IQ at 105? Who are you to look down on our system, when it has performed remarkably well in global rankings? Chinese education system has long history and Chinese scholars have been studying for examinations since thousands of years ago, when Chinese invented imperial examination system. In fact, this merit system was spread from China to British India during the 17th century, and then into continental Europe, so who are you to mock Chinese education system when it is thanks to China that world education has improved? Merit System: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merit_system So you come to China for few years, then suddenly you become expert in China's 5000 year history and know everything there is to know about China? Who do you think you are? You are just foreign exchange student in our country for few years. Even Chinese scholars and historians are making new discoveries and uncovering mysteries about our past, even in this day and age, so what makes you know more about China than what Chinese people know? When did I ever labelled "other cultures as backward and inferior"? Can you quote me the exact words I said? China doesn't allow UN people to visit Tibet, because 14th Dalai Lama was a traitor who conspired with CIA in separatist activities against the government. In 1951, the 14th Dalai Lama signed the signed Seventeen Point Agreement, acknowledging China's sovereignty over Tibet. Eight years later, he broke the agreement led uprising in 1959 against the government with the help of CIA. Normally, Tibetan spiritual leaders are supposed to be removed from worldly affairs, but by involving himself in politics, the 14th DL is no longer fit to be leader of Tibet. You think a true spiritual leader will use his religious influence to train Tibetan guerrillas to fight against the government? That is exactly how terrorists hijack Islam by acting as pseudo priests to convince their followers to die for their political cause. 14th DL is to China, what Wikileaks whistle-blower Edward Snowden is to America. Snowden now seeks refuge in Russia, so you think USA will allow Snowden back into America after what he's done? In the same way, China will not let 14th DL back into China without making him pay for his crimes. CIA knows this and is secretly sponsoring DL to preach in various different places, while his followers (exiled Tibetans) suffer. Exiled Tibetans are already so poor, so where does 14th DL get the money to even engage in talks and campaigns? Answer: CIA I don't think you actually learnt anything on your trip to China. You tell me to travel to other countries and broaden my horizons, but you yourself travel to China and left with the same Western mindset impressed upon you when you were born. You never tried to understand issues from China's point of view at all, and constantly mock our government and education as inferior. Exactly how are you being humble, when you obviously think you know everything about China and Tibet simply because you been here and talked to some "professors"?
    1
  26200. +L C You mentioned you were "extremely disappointed" with China's education system. In the same way you described, Chinese students can always visit your country and feel disappointed with the lack of mathematical and sciences skills of your students now, can't they? Why you blame China's education system because it is weaker in some aspects and stronger in others? I don't blame your country for not producing globally recognized levels of science and mathematics isn't it? As far as I know, China is the top international school in Asia, beating even Japan and Korea so I don't think those countries have an issue with our education system. If you look world map of national IQ scores, China, South Korea and Japan share almost equally high IQ levels, so isn't that indication that such people do not harbor such criticisms towards Chinese education system? World Map of National IQ Scores targetmap.com/ThumbnailsReports/16799_THUMB_IPAD.jpg Obviously, you went to China, but returned without any meaningful insight into China, since you still harbor the same impression of China that Western media has probably imprinted onto you since birth. Would you like to tell me exactly how has your visit to China affected your view of China? Because you are unchanged in your views regarding our educations system, our government, Tibet and so on, so exactly how did the trip affect you at all? Education is not copying, but why is copying not a form of education? You think Chinese people learned nothing by studying other countries? Every country copies technology from one another at some point in history and eventually improve on the original designs. For example, US tank technology is advanced today, because it absorbed the WW2 Nazi technology. The US space program made use of Nazi V2 Rocket scientists to develop rockets capable of reaching the Moon. Would USA be as successful as it is today without copying? So it is true that Damaru drums are made from human skulls, so why did you say "You're also very wrong about the Damaru stuff."? Which part of my statement is wrong? Really, 90-95% of Chinese people is Han Chinese. Are you really sure you've been to China at all? When did I ever labelled "other cultures as backward and inferior"? Can you quote me the exact words I said? I have wrong views? How do you know you aren't the one having wrong views? You have been consistently wrong on a number of things already. Mao's policies may have been disastrous in his later life, but Mao Zedong had managed to unify whole China, where the previous administration KMT failed to do so. China was once democratic when Sun Yatsen overthrew Qing dynasty in 1911 and established Republic of China. But ROC failed to unify China and China was plagued by various warlords fighting for control as well as invasion by Japanese. Next China tried communism and it managed to unify all of China, where ROC failed to do so. But while Mao was brilliant tactician, he was poor governor and his disastrous policies affected China adversely, so Deng Xiaoping stepped in and introduce capitalism, which brought much progress to China till today. As you can see, it was not easy to come by to China's current arrangement. The CPC has long acknowledged the mistakes of Mao's policies and even Mao himself made self-criticism and stepped down from being state Chairman, which allowed Deng to introduce his economic reforms. I have never said Chinese government is perfect, but the fact that it learns from past mistakes is what enables it to adapt to changing circumstances. Great Leap Forward en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Leap_Forward#Impact_on_the_government The government and people of China have long since moved from the failed policies of Red China, but that does not mean we have forgotten the lessons. The Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution are taught in Chinese textbooks today so that the mistakes won't be repeated again in future. Remember that people back then did not know that those policies would turned out to be so harmful for China. Hindsight is 50-50 isn't it? It is unlikely that the people of Tibet will be granted freedom. If the people of Scotland want freedom then you are free to follow your own system, but will it be beneficial for United Kingdom if it breaks apart? A unified country is strong, while a divided country is weak. That's why China fight so hard to hold on to Hong Kong and Taiwan. America is strong because it consist of united states. Soviet Union was strong for same reason, and after USSR dissolution, Russia is not as powerful. EU was strong because it was unified, and now EU weakened because of Britain's exit. Scotland also probably wants to leave UK, so what good will come out of this separation? If your country had the means to prevent such separation, why not make use of it to ensure your country's continued survival? As for people leaving China, China has world's largest population, and therefore there is competition for resources. With such high student population, competition for tops schools and higher education is fierce and intense, and some students are forced to seek education outside of China. To China, the rest of the world is severely underpopulated, so the government sees nothing wrong with people leaving the country as the country's resources are already taxed to the limit. As for rich Chinese buying up properties in other countries, there could be a number of reasons. Most people leave China because of the pollution or they want to invest their money in something substantial outside of China. Also, quite a few CPC officials are corrupt and could be trying escape the government and hiding the money by buying up properties in other countries. But the government is also trying to catch overseas corruption according to following article. China’s Overseas Anti-Corruption Efforts Nets 288 Suspects thediplomat.com/2014/11/chinas-overseas-anti-corruption-efforts-nets-288-suspects/ It is apparent that you are still colored by Western perceptions of China and that your visit to China has not really changed your opinion of China much. After all, your perception of China appears to be stuck in Red China, when many Chinese people have long since moved on from that period. Our government is not perfect, and made many mistakes in the past. But many Chinese today believe that it has redeemed itself by lifting 600 million people out of poverty today. According to World Bank, China's poverty fell from 88% in 1981 to 6.5% in 2012. Poverty in China en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Since you are foreigner, it is unrealistic to expect you to view China through lens of Chinese person, since you never grew up during those hard times. To you, modernization was easy process, but for China it was tumultuous and difficult period and it not easy to get to where we are today.
    1
  26201. +Debtanu Chakraborty What makes you think Tibet would have modernized without the help of CPC? Tibet is located in the Himalayas and was isolated from rest of the world throughout history. Tibet's mountainous soil was infertile and unsuitable for agriculture, so it will have hard time feeding its population. Even in 1950s, Tibet had no schools (besides Buddhist Monasteries), no hospitals, no roads, no electricity and plumbing. Even the Dalai Lama has admitted that "Tibet, materially, is very, very backward. Spiritually it is quite rich. But spirituality can't fill our stomachs." So what makes you think Tibet would have modernized itself under Dalai Lama's rule? Source: theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/feb/10/tibet-china-feudalism I have said that Damaru drums were made of human skulls and skin so exactly what am I saying wrongly here? Why do you people say I am completely wrong in this regard? What do you know about how Chinese government treats Tibetans at all? Why don't you look at Indian Army atrocities committed on people of Kashmir before you talk about China? Many Muslim women have become victims of rape and sexual assault in the conflict and the frequent rape of Kashmiri Muslim women by Indian state security forces routinely goes unpunished. -A study in 2008 by Médecins Sans Frontières concluded that Kashmiri women are among the worst sufferers of sexual violence in the world Many cases not reported because of the shame and stigma associated with rape in Kashmir. Indian Army officers, of the rank of major or above, have participated in torture as well as sexual violence and the Indian government was covering up such acts. Rape during the Kashmir conflict en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_during_the_Kashmir_conflict In contrast, Tibetans today live better life with modern technology than what is happening in Kashmir even till today.
    1
  26202. +Debtanu Chakraborty The reason some Chinese may have treated Indians like that is because people like you lack logic. You want to compare Tibet to Singapore? Singapore is one of world's most busiest ports, because of its strategic location, whereas Tibet is isolated and landlocked. You think Tibetans could afford to build infrastructure? Qinghai railway is world's highest elevation railway built by Chinese on difficult mountainous terrain, through regions of permafrost and low oxygen level regions, so much that every carriages has oxygen supply for EACH passenger and every train has a trained doctor. You think Tibetans could afford that without China? Tibet population is small because of insufficient food to feed everyone and you mean being "gender neutral" is enough to qualify for self-modernization? Who would accept that simply treating genders equally, means the country will modernize automatically? There are so many factors to determine modernization, yet you quote gender equality as one of your points? Also, unlike India, full ordination of women as nuns never occurred within Tibet, and all Tibetan education was conducted by the Tibetan monasteries, meaning Tibetan women were virtually illiterate throughout their lives. Rising India and China only modernizes Tibet, because of Tibet is part of China, and is rising with China as well. For example, Nepal also located between India and China, but lacks the proper infrastructure developed in Tibet by Chinese. Nepal also lacks proper healthcare whereas Tibet has hospitals. Internet access is also not widely spread, so in what way has Nepal truly modernized itself with respect to Tibet here? You think religion and spiritually alone can support Tibet? In 2001 the Dalai Lama himself already said Tibet, while rich in spiritually, is very, very backward materially and that spirituality can't fill stomachs, so how is it religion alone able to feed the Tibetan population. winter han is right in the sense of how hard it is to talk with someone with completely different view of the world. Even this L C guy lived in China as exchange student and studied here, but he still retains Western perception of China and left without learning anything and changing his mindset. Yet people like him encourages others to travel and "open" their minds? Such hypocrisy.
    1
  26203. +Debtanu Chakraborty You lied about Singapore not having busy port since it was built. Singapore always been gateway between East and West because of its strategic location, which was why British colonial powers colonized it in the first place. You think the British didn't see the value of Singapore as port to trade with the east? Singapore became one of Britain's prized colonial possessions, and after it gained independence, Singapore government began developing its port facilities further to take advantage of its location. Tibet, however, is landlocked and so far, India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, etc are not as concerned over Tibetan control of water as they should be. If it were really that important, then why don't those countries attempt wrest control of Tibet from China? There hasn't been much dispute over water issues, and frankly, our countries are more interested in border disputes than caring about water sources, so why do you still believe that these countries will sudden be interested in "investing in Tibet for water management of the entire continent?" Up till now, none of those countries have expressed any interest whatsoever, except China. Modernization of Tibet involves more than just building Qinghai railway alone. Chinese workers have also built hospitals and schools and universities to provide better healthcare and access to education for Tibetans. Through the railway, modern technology such as farming equipment, cars, electronics such as smartphones, computers and appliances were introduced to Tibet. You think every Tibetan wants to grow up to be poor yak farmer or Tibetan monk? Young Tibetans want to education to find paying job, buy luxuries such as cars and other electronic devices, get married and settle down, so what right do you have to decide that Tibetan's should be isolated from rest of the world, and remain poor forever? You aren't even living in Tibet, so what do you know how Tibetans feel about the government? It was the Dalai Lama who quoted: "Spirituality doesn't feed stomachs." so why are you blaming me all of sudden? If you really thing the Dalai Lama's own words are BS, then you should tell it to him directly. I don't abuse vulgarities against you so why are you being so disrespectful? What war dragon image are you talking about? China has not been involved in any war since our last major war in 1979 and has been peaceful for 30 years, so what are you talking about? Tibet was part of China during Qing Dynasty up to in 1912 and China only reclaimed it back in 1951. Contrary to what you said, China is not only America's biggest trading partner, but most of the world as well, including India, does business with China, so what suspicion are you referring to here? So just because you don't like modernization, means you deny Tibetans the right to education, to healthcare, and to other modern amenities like Internet? Who do you think you are? Like I said above, Tibetans deserve access to modern technology, instead of living in stone ages, without water, electricity and gas. As for gender equality, have you ever noticed that all Tibetans monks were men? Nuns in Tibetan Buddhism wasn't widely accepted, only until recently and like I said, Tibetan monasteries controlled all of Tibetan's education. In my previous sources, I highlighted the sexual abuse of young Tibetan monks so what makes you think Tibet had any true sense of gender neutrality? You speak of self-immolation in Tibet, but at most only 100 or so Tibetans have protested by self-immolation, but does that mean that all 3 million Tibetans want independence? Why should 3,000,000 Tibetans give in to the demands of 100 or so self-immolating protestors? In India, as many as 1,451 and 1,584 self-immolations have been reported in 2000 and 2001, respectively. That's already much more serious than in Tibet, so why don't Indian government do something about it? You speak of gender neutrality, when in India there are forced marriages, unaffordable dowries, and bridal abuse by burning/acid scarring and various sexual abuses? Who are you to talk of rape when Indian Army soldiers have been raping Muslim women in Kashmir even till today? Why don't you Indians fix India's own problems first* before complaining about China's treatment of Tibet?
    1
  26204. +Debtanu Chakraborty Who is the one somehow believe that landlocked Tibet could be as prosperous as the port of Singapore due to location alone. Look at other Himalayan countries like Bhutan and do you consider them prosperous? Bhutan didn't even have television until 2001s and even till today, relies heavily on India for trade, so what makes you think Tibet would be more successful than Bhutan? Look at Nepal, located between India and China, but still not as prosperous as Singapore. Your logic doesn't even make sense yet, you somehow believe Tibet can magically modernize by itself? You said "China could modernize itself without the help of the West." so why can't every other country also modernize without the help of the West? Look at India, it has world's 2nd largest population, therefore a large workforce like China. Indians speak English, while Chinese are still struggling with English. Indians also have democratic system whereas China is communist. Republic of India became independent in 1947, two years before People's Republic of China was founded in 1949. Yet China overtook India. So why do you still think that any country in the world is able to modernize by itself? Why are you so obsessed with femininity and rape? Who said anything about expressing femininity equals rape? Besides Indian Army raping the Muslims in Kashmir, Indian Peacekeeping Force sent to Sri Lanka to fight the Tamil Tigers, went to rape the local Tamil women instead. Indian forces participated in number of incidents of human rights violation, including rape, torture, detention and massacres, like Valvettiturai massacre. IPKF even entered Jaffna teaching hospital over 70 civilians were massacred. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Peace_Keeping_Force#Controversies ) First off, the numbers are 3,000,000 to 100, so why do you take the actions of 100 Tibetans self immolating to represent the whole of 3 million Tibetans views? What about the 1,451 and 1,584 self-immolations in India? Isn't that a much more urgent matter to address than the actions of 100 Tibetans self-immolations? Why don't you Indians fix your own problems of rape in Indian Army, forced marriages, self-immolatinos etc before you start talking about how China handles Tibet? The Dalai Lama said that verse and I am merely quoting him, so why are you calling it BS and labeling me a troll, because I quoted him? Who is the troll here who still thinks Tibetans want freedom when it is clear that they don't, You don't see 3,000,000 Tibetans protesting against the government, now don't you? Countries all over the world have recognized Chinese sovereignty over Tibet, and when you draw map of PRC, Tibet is always included as part of China. Even the uploader's video shows this at 0:10. As for Kashmir, most of the world accepts it part of Pakistan. Even uploader's video at 2:43 shows Indian map without Kashmir as part of India, so why are you complaining? India has had almost 70 years to reclaim that territory from Pakistan, but didn't achieve it, so whose fault is it here?
    1
  26205. +Parm Mohan In warfare, what's important than technology is your allies. Near the end of WWII, Germany had surrendered, and Hitler committed suicide in his bunker, leaving Japan without an ally to continue fighting the war. At that time, Soviet Union was neutral, so Japan was banking on the slight possibility that Moscow would join Japan against the Allies. But Moscow responded by invading Japanese-occupied Manchuria and at that point, the Japanese knew they lost all chance of continuing the war, once Russia allied with the Allies against it. About US nuclear bombs, the USA had suspected that the Soviet Union had nuclear bombs of its own and the USA bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki (even when it was clear that Japan was already going to surrender, once Russia joined the Allies) in order to showcase USA's nuclear capabilities. Many years after Japanese WWII surrender, historians and scholars have deduced that the US's nuclear bombing was unnecessary in getting Japan to surrender. A-Bombing of Japan Was Unnecessary Source: nytimes.com/1988/10/29/opinion/l-a-bombing-of-japan-was-unnecessary-393488.html 2nd point: What point are you trying to make that India was democratic and therefore aligned with the West? Soviet Union was communist and it was still part of the Allies (Russia is also a UN permanent member) so what point are you trying to make here? According to your source, ..Mr. Tharoor writes that Indian diplomats who have seen files swear that Nehru declined the offer.. But its written by Mr. Tharoor and not the actual words of Nehru himself. According to the following source, Prime Minister Nehru has categorically denied any offer, formal or informal, having been received about a seat for India in the UN Security Council. The Prime Minister said: "There has been no offer, formal or informal, of this kind. Some vague references have appeared in the press about it which have no foundation in fact. The composition of the Security Council is prescribed by the UN Charter, according to which certain specified nations have permanent seats. No change or addition can be made to this without an amendment of the Charter. There is, therefore, no question of a seat being offered and India declining it. Our declared policy is to support the admission of all nations qualified for UN membership.'' UN seat: Nehru clarifies Source: thehindu.com/2005/09/28/stories/2005092800270900.htm As far as I know, my source is dated later than yours, and the words came out of PM Nehru's mouth, not by your source, which claims some Indian diplomats seen Nehru declined the offer.
    1
  26206. +Parm Mohan What has Putin, Trump or Xi even got to do with this discussion? Near the end of WWII, Germany surrendered and Hitler committed suicide in his bunker, and left Japan alone to due with the angry Allies. Japan attacking Pearl Harbor in 1942, but Russian invasion of Manchuria was in 1945, 3 years later, so why you claim Russian launched its own front? Also, at that time, Republic of China was administered by Kuomintang, not the Chinese Communists (who only took control of China in 1949) so its understandable that communist Soviet Union had a weak relation with democratic Republic of China, due to their ideological differences at that time. 2nd point: What logic have you shown thus far? You claim India was democratic and therefore LOGICAL to give the UN seat to India instead of China, but Russia was Communist, and yet Russia is a permanent member of the UN Security Council, not India. So who says joining the UNSC was a matter of ideology? Look at the historical facts: the United Nations Security Council was established in 1945, of which 5 countries (USA, UK, France, Russia and China) are permanent members. In 1945, India was still a British colony (Republic of India was only founded in 1947, 2 years later) so why would the UNSC offer a seat to a British colony? It would be like Britain having 2 seats in the UNSC!
    1
  26207. +Parm Mohan Who says that the country's goverment (ROC) is seated permanently in UNSC? Russia under the Soviet Union was a permanent member of UN, but after the dissolution of Soviet Union in 1990s, the Russian government changed but the Russian Federation was still part of the UNSC. So the countries remain, despite their government changing. And when the UN decided to recognize PRC as China in the General Assembly Resolution 2758, there was no mention of any seat being given to India at all. Where in General Assembly Resolution 2758 does it show India is being considered for a UN seat? United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_2758 Like Indian PM Nehru himself said: "There has been no offer, formal or informal, of this kind. Some vague references have appeared in the press about it which have no foundation in fact. The composition of the Security Council is prescribed by the UN Charter, according to which certain specified nations have permanent seats. No change or addition can be made to this without an amendment of the Charter." Since the composition of the Security Council is prescribed by the UN Charter, there can be no change to which members are permanent, unless the entire UN decides to amend its charter. Therefore China (the country) is a permanent member of the UNSC. India may have voted for PRC, but India was certainly not offered any UN seat like you claim. Republic of China was also allied with the West in fighting Japan, so what is your point? China became part of the UN at the same time as USSR, but ROC was democratic and Soviet Union was communist, so those two presumably didn't get along based on ideological differences. And since China had become communist later, and India was democratic, its quite likely the Soviet Union would have vetoed India's entry into the UNSC. My History is all over the place? Here are your exact words "But Japan attacked Pearl Harbor instead. When Russia learned of this attack possibility by Japan, it launched its own front." But when did Russia launch its own front against Japan? Russian invasion of Manchuria occurred 3 years after the Japanese Pearl Harbor Bombing isn't it? Russia's invasion of Manchuria was AFTER the USA had dropped its atomic bombs on Japan, and like I said earlier, the invasion was the last fought campaign of WWII, before the Japanese finally surrendered. Which part of this statement is wrong? Japan still had not surrendered after two US nuclear bombings and only after Russia attacked, did the Japanese finally surrendered.
    1
  26208.  @strnglhld  Here's an interview with Peng Shuai by a reporter from Singaporean newspaper Lianhe Zaobao and she denies the accusation of sexual assault in her post. Video:youtu.be/ZF9Owb9uSOE
    1
  26209.  @USandGlobal  As I've stated, it's according to Global Trade Alert, a trusted and recognized independent monitor of policies impacting global commerce. Otherwise, do you have any evidence that China does not allow foreigners to check their commercial data?
    1
  26210.  @bluemarlin9110  Peace requires cooperation of many different countries. But it only takes a single specific country to start conflicts all across the globe.
    1
  26211. The U.S also left many unexploded ordinance in Vietnam and Cambodia even till today. Yet the U.S still want these countries not to work or cooperate with China.
    1
  26212.  @liyuanqian9143  You said: "Shenzhou. False assumption about ethnic Chinese majority being a premise of Singapore bring naturally close to China, be it ROC or PRC. There are almost twice as many ethnic Chinese in the USA than Singapore." But ethnic Chinese are clearly not the majority in the United States (obviously) whereas Chinese constitute the majority of the people in Singapore, ROC and PRC, so what's the point of bringing up the Chinese population in the USA compared to Singapore? "The Singapore government has emphasized constantly the distinction between ethnic identity as a personal matter that must never trespass into the public space." No doubt about it. Likewise, Taiwan's government will have ample reason to reject the idea of a Chinese commonwealth. Honestly speaking, if George Yeo can't accept Singapore joining the Chinese commonwealth, then how to expect Taiwan's government to accept it? (I appreciate the fact that you noted it was a CNA reporter who posed this question to George Yeo, not me)
    1
  26213.  @josejose1988  "Shenzhou. Singapore is not Taiwan." Absolutely. But that's why I find the idea of Singapore suggesting that Taiwan join a Chinese commonwealth somewhat presumptuous. If Singapore doesn't want to join this Chinese commonwealth, what do you think the chances are that Taiwan would want to join this commonwealth?
    1
  26214.  @hongmama1245  "Shenzhou. It is already mentioned that the solution is not perfect," Well, since you also know the solution is not perfect, then is there something wrong when I point out its flaws?
    1
  26215.  @KalecgosMagic  "Shenzhou. What a joke answer. Taiwan can't even begin to be compared to Singapore in this regard." I've never compared Singapore to Taiwan, all I stated is that if Singapore itself doesn't want to be part of a Chinese commonwealth, then the chances of Taiwan joining this commonwealth is slim. "Singapore would gain nothing by joining a Chinese commonwealth." Singapore might gain protection from China. Any military action taken against Singapore would be regarded as an attack on a Chinese territory. Of course we are talking in a scenario where Singapore joins this Chinese commonwealth. "Conversely, Singapore would come under Chinese political influence which would undermine its sovereignty" How would Chinese political influence undermine Singapore's sovereignty? "We're surrounded by Muslim majority countries which are ever looking for a chance to influence Singapore politics & watch it fall." In such a case then, wouldn't it be a good idea for Singapore to have support from a larger country?
    1
  26216.  @NeostormXLMAX  "as far as i can see, the USA is guardian of values, human rights, democracy and freedom" If that's truly the case, then why isn't the USA calling for an immediate ceasefire to the conflict in Gaza, in which nearly 20,000 Palestinian civilians have been killed (majority of whom are women and children)?
    1
  26217.  @stupidwars88  "Singapore isn't Taiwan btw." Once again, I've never compared Singapore to Taiwan. All I'm saying is if Singapore is put in the same shoes as Taiwan, would they even agree to join a Chinese commonwealth. If not, then George Yeo is going to have a hard time convincing Taiwan to join this Chinese commonwealth. You said: "S'pore is also a political union of other races like Malays & Indians and it's situated within South-east Asia & belongs to that region." Singapore's political system probably shares more in common with China's political system than with its neighboring South East Asian states. And if you talk to an outsider, Singapore doesn't really seem as though it belongs in South East Asia, it sticks out quite a lot from the rest of South East Asia countries. Of course, no doubt Singapore is geographically located in South East Asia, but it doesn't necessarily means it belongs there. Singapore is like an outlier in the region in my opinion.
    1
  26218.  @andrewhwang7920  "Shenzhou. Singapore is not solely populated by ethnic Chinese & Mandarin is not its main language & Chinese culture is not its predominant culture." Chinese make up three quarters of Singapore's population and Mandarin is an official language in Singapore. Chinese culture is also Singapore's predominant culture. The Spring Festival (Chinese New Year) is the most widely celebrated festival in Singapore, even more than Christmas.
    1
  26219.  @mcs351  "Shenzhou. The question in itself is totally off-tangent and repeating is equally totally off-tangent." It's just a simple question on whether Singapore would be willing to join the Chinese commonwealth that's all. If this simple question riled people up so much, then can you imagine Taiwan joining this Chinese commonwealth, when even the person that proposed this idea isn't keen on his country joining the Chinese commonwealth?
    1
  26220.  @mcs351  "Shenzhou. There is no relevance here - Singapore was Never part of China," So since Mongolia was historically part of China, are you going to recommend that Mongolia join this Chinese commonwealth?
    1
  26221. Even the United States of America has acknowledged that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26222.  @tkam9  "Shenzhou. Singapore, Hong Kong, Macua, Taiwan and China are already member of the Chinese (not PRC) commonwealth as far as shared cultural values, interdependent commerce and shared language are concerns." Exactly, it's only a matter putting it on paper. However, I wouldn't use the term "commonwealth" since its more of a Western term that's strongly associated with the colonial powers. Perhaps Chinese Civilization would be a more appropriate term, and it so happens that mainland China (PRC) considers itself the keeper of Chinese civilization.
    1
  26223.  @josejose1988  "Shenzhou. Unfortunately your premise is faulty . Singapore is not Taiwan." The "premise" is Singapore telling Taiwan to join a Chinese commonwealth that Singapore itself doesn't want to join, you think Taiwan would agree to it?
    1
  26224.  @Sean-giang  "Shenzhou. Lai is now president of taiwan" Well, best of luck to anyone trying to convince Lai to get Taiwan to join a Chinese commonwealth. This idea isn't even mine to begin with, it's George Yeo's idea. And the question about Singapore joining this Chinese commonwealth was asked by a CNA reporter, not me. I don't even know the dude, but I do know that Yeo doesn't want Singapore to join the commonwealth.
    1
  26225.  @Sean-giang  "china, Taiwan, hk and Macau are part of manchurian commonwealth" But the Manchurian conquerors named their country as Yuan Dynasty China and assimilated into Han Chinese culture, political system, bureaucracy and methods of governance. After conquering the Ming, the Qing often identified their state as "China" (中國, Zhongguo; "Middle Kingdom"), and referred to it as Dulimbai Gurun ("Middle Kingdom") in Manchu. It was also common to use "China" (Zhongguo, Dulimbai gurun) to refer to the Qing in official documents, international treaties, and foreign affairs. In diplomatic documents, the term "Chinese language" (Dulimbai gurun i bithe) referred to the Chinese, Manchu, and Mongol languages, and the term "Chinese people" (中國人 Zhongguo ren; Manchu: Dulimbai gurun i niyalma) referred to all Han, Manchus, and Mongol subjects of the Qing. The Qing explicitly stated that the lands in Manchuria belonged to "China" (Zhongguo, Dulimbai gurun) in Qing edicts and in the 1689 Treaty of Nerchinsk.
    1
  26226.  @Sean-giang  "china, Taiwan, hk and Macau are part of manchurian commonwealth" The Manchurian conquerors named their state as Qing Dynasty China and assimilated into Han Chinese culture, political system, bureaucracy and methods of governance. After conquering the Ming, the Qing often identified their state as "China" (中國, Zhongguo; "Middle Kingdom")... It was also common to use "China" (Zhongguo, Dulimbai gurun) to refer to the Qing in official documents, international treaties, and foreign affairs...The Qing explicitly stated that the lands in Manchuria belonged to "China" (Zhongguo, Dulimbai gurun) in Qing edicts and in the 1689 Treaty of Nerchinsk.
    1
  26227.  @Sean-giang  "Shenzhou. it can't because it's already part of the British commonwealth." It's ironic that Singapore is vehemently against joining a Chinese commonwealth, but it doesn't mind being part of the British commonwealth. The term "commonwealth" is strongly associated with the colonial power and it might even be an attempt by Britain to retain some degree of control over its former colonies (of which Singapore happens to be one). This may be why George Yeo thinks it's a great idea, but the term is not suitable for China. China is a civilization state with 5,000 years of history and culture, with a different way of thinking. In Chinese minds, the best solution is still reunification through the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy.
    1
  26228.  @Sean-giang  "Technically taiwan could be part of a Japanese commonwealth. Or Spanish or Dutch commonwealth." Good luck trying to convince Taiwan to be part of those commonwealths. Its just making things unnecessarily complicated. None of those 3 countries you mentioned are staking a claim on Taiwan island at the moment, it's primarily mainland China that is doing so. And Beijing is pursuing reunification in its own way, not through the idea of a Chinese commonwealth.
    1
  26229.  @josejose1988  Waste of time? Who's the one wasting time by constantly repeating that "Taiwan is not Singapore. Singapore is not Taiwan." after I've replied "Absolutely"? If Singapore doesn't want to join the Chinese commonwealth, then what's the point of Singapore telling Taiwan to join? And mind you, just look up Taiwanese reaction to George Yeo's statement, and even they ask if Singapore itself would like to join.
    1
  26230.  @hongmama1245  "Shenzhou. When you point out a flaw without a solution, its sounds to me its a pointless comment." No it isn't. Pointing out the flaw is the first step as to recognizing that a problem exists, so there is a point to be made after all.
    1
  26231.  @liyuanqian9143  "Shenzhou. Jewish Americans and Irish Americans aren't majority in the USA but they do influence American politics" But do the Malays and other ethnic minorities in Singapore influence Singapore's politics? Or is it the Chinese in Singapore that influence its politics? If the former were the case, then Singapore and Malaysia would be on good terms, better than they are now.
    1
  26232.  @liyuanqian9143  "the proposal was made on the premise that the current ROC was a continuation of the same ROC that was founded in 1911, as a multi ethnic nation," The Republic of China 🇹🇼 founded in 1911 was hardly multi ethnic at all. The ROC controlled only China's eastern coast (where mostly Han live) while Tibet, Xinjiang (Uighurs), Inner Mongolia had broken away. It was the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 that reunified China in 1949 and Tibet was returned back to the mainland in 1951.
    1
  26233.  @liyuanqian9143  "Shenzhou. whether TW will ever agree to a Commonwealth will not be due to common ethnic background" George Yeo said that the division between Taiwan and the mainland was "at the political level; not at the cultural and civilizational level." Therefore, his commonwealth idea is based on the premise that Taiwan shares much in common with the mainland in terms of Chinese culture and Chinese civilization. You said: "To many "ethnic Chinese" outside PRC & ROC, especially in SEA where George Yeo comes from, the PRC, or ROC, are just governments." No, not "just governments" alone, but either one are seen the government of "Chinese civilization." Most of them recognize PRC, while a few of them recognize the ROC as the government. But in either case there can only be one government of Chinese civilization.
    1
  26234.  @liyuanqian9143  "Shenzhou. the history of modern Mongolia was that its statehood was recognized" I only brought up Mongolia because people keep repeating "Singapore was never part of China" of which I've agreed is true. But even if you bring up a country that was historically part of China, like say Mongolia or Vietnam, chances of them actually joining a Chinese commonwealth are as slim as that of Taiwan joining or even Singapore joining for that matter.
    1
  26235.  @SaretGnasoh  "Shenzhou. the different is, Singapore didn't have problem with China," If Singapore truly had no problem with China, then why George Yeo refuse to even consider Singapore joining this Chinese commonwealth that he suggested? And if Singapore doesn't want to join, then the chances of Taiwan joining this commonwealth are even slimmer.
    1
  26236.  @liyuanqian9143  "The government has been very careful to prevent ethnic majority to marginalize politically other ethnic groups." Does Singapore have a Malay Prime Minister (not President) then? Why are all of Singapore's Prime Ministers of Chinese descent, both the current and previous PMS.
    1
  26237.  @mcs351  "because you’re fixated on a fallacious argument. The way you presented your point is no different from some who argued nonstop that Taiwan..." Aren't you the one resorting to fallacious argument here by comparing my argument to someone else's argument? What has the example you brought up even got to do with the argument I presented? If Singapore itself can't even accept joining this Chinese commonwealth, then the chances of Taiwan joining this commonwealth are even slimmer.
    1
  26238.  @mcs351  You said: "hence your argument about even Singapore can't accept being a commonwealth to China is absurd." Let's get this straight. The question of whether Singapore would be willing to join the Chinese commonwealth was asked by a CNA reporter (i.e Singapore media) and George Yeo's answer was "never in the political sense." So it wasn't even my question to begin with, it was posed by a Singaporean reporter to Yeo. And I don't even like Yeo's idea of a "Chinese commonwealth" in the first place. The term "commonwealth" is strongly associated with colonial powers retaining control over their former colonies. My solution has always been reunification through the 1 Country, 2 Systems policy.
    1
  26239.  @elsagelympne7943  Singapore has also 75% Chinese. Also mainland China is surrounded by Muslim countries such as Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, etc.
    1
  26240.  @mcs351  "Shenzhou. Who said that you mooted the idea of a Chinese commonwealth for Taiwan?" I thought we've been talking about Singapore all this time, why are you switching to Taiwan? Did you even read my reply properly? You said: "hence your argument about even Singapore can't accept being a commonwealth to China is absurd." I wrote: Let's get this straight. The question of whether Singapore would be willing to join the Chinese commonwealth was asked by a CNA reporter (i.e Singapore media) and George Yeo's answer was "never in the political sense." So it wasn't even my question to begin with, it was posed by a Singaporean reporter to Yeo. So who said anything about me mooting the idea of a Chinese commonwealth for Taiwan? If anything it looks as though you're the one who's confused here.
    1
  26241.  @atky7032  "Chinese are only 60% of the population. There are Malays and Indians. So of course is 'never the political sense'." Why'd you bring up the different ethnic groups, and then punctuate it with "never in the political sense?" Politically, Singapore has been governed by a single-party authoritarian government under PAP for 58 years, similar to how China has been governed by the CPC for 74 years. So aren't the two politically similar?
    1
  26242.  @liyuanqian9143  You said: "Shenzhou. Why not? It's ensuring ethnic minority not marginalized" Alright, so what's the percentage of Malays in Singapore's political system? How many Malay ministers are there in Singapore's current cabinet?
    1
  26243.  @meouby2  "Shenzhou. Doesnt make sense comparing taiwan to singapore" The point is that a CNA reporter (i.e Singapore media) posed the question to George Yeo if Singapore would like to join this Chinese commonwealth and Yeo's answer was "never in the political sense." So if Singapore doesn't want to join, then what are the chances that Taiwan will?
    1
  26244.  @elsagelympne7943  "Shenzhou. No,Singapore has less than 67% Chinese" In 2020, the percentage of Chinese constituted 74.3 percent (according to Singstat website) and ethnic Chinese remain the largest population in Singapore.
    1
  26245.  @liyuanqian9143  Look, you wrote earlier that "The government has been very careful to prevent ethnic majority to marginalize politically other ethnic groups." yet you can't even name me the percentage of Malay politicians in Singapore's current cabinet?
    1
  26246.  @RedXlV  You said: "That Hong Kong was never going to be allowed to maintain any real autonomy within China." Hong Kong clearly have their own separate government from the mainland, separate currency (HK Dollars), separate passport (HK passport), even their own Hong Kong flag 🇭🇰 and in fact, Hong Kong held more elections AFTER the 1997 handover back to China, than they ever did for 150 years prior as a British colony.
    1
  26247.  @bartonlee3594  ​Taken from Human Rights Watch: Singapore "Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations." — Human Rights Watch: Singapore So even if they claim to be anti-communist, doesn't Singapore's political system sound quite similar to China's?
    1
  26248.  @liyuanqian9143  "Should people in government be there through merit or through their ethnicity?" I honestly don't care about the persons ethnicity as long as they are competent in their job. Since we're talking about merit, Singapore follows a meritocratic system where competent people get promoted based on performance, and this system actually originated in ancient China in the form of civil service examinations that scholars sat through to attain their positions. In this sense, Singapore's political system shares much in common with China's, having been derived from meritocracy. Also, there's the fact that around 75% of Singapore's population is Chinese.
    1
  26249.  @bartonlee3594  "The last time I was in Singapore, I saw an exhibition of subversive art that included works by Ai Weiwei." Ai Weiwei is a mainland China dissident, of course he's allowed in Singapore, what's the point of you bringing him up? However, Singapore's own dissidents (i.e Francis Seow) have been exiled by Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore's founder) because they disagree with the ruling PAP government. "Homosexuality is fully tolerated in Singapore, which I was personally pleased to see." According to Human Rights Watch, the rights of LGBT people in Singapore are severely curtailed and homosexuality between men wasn't tolerated for most of Singapore's life as a nation.
    1
  26250.  @bartonlee3594  "Singapore holds parliamentary elections in which opposition candidates sometimes win elections." None of the opposition candidates in Singapore's election have ever became Singapore's leader (i.e Prime Minister). The authoritarian single-party People's Action Party has been consecutively governing Singapore for 58 years without switching to any other smaller party. Similarly, China has been governed by the CPC for 74 years. Singapore's Prime Minister Lee has been in power for 19 years (since 2004) far longer than Chinese President Xi been in power for 11 years (since 2012). Yet it's Xi that often gets labelled President for Life in the media. If anything, Singapore's political system shares much in common with China's.
    1
  26251.  @bartonlee3594  "Shenzhou. Have you ever been to Singapore?" Yes, I've been to Singapore before and it shares many similarities to China. Mandarin Chinese is one of the official languages in Singapore, spoken everywhere and Chinese characters can be seen on shop signs, notice boards, restaurant menus, etc. Singapore's government also doesn't tolerate dissidents, such as Amos Yee, who criticize Singapore's founding father, Lee Kuan Yew and became a fugitive as a result. So doesn't Singapore's system sound very much like China's? The single party PAP has been governing Singapore for 58 years much like CPC has been governing China for 74 years. Have you ever been to China before?
    1
  26252.  @bartonlee3594  The opposition parties have little impact on Singapore's politics, and they mainly consist namely of "weak" candidates. Any "strong" candidates have identified earlier and have either been arrested or exiled by the PAP. Like Singapore, China also has 8 other political parties (other than the CPC) namely the Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang, China Democratic League, China National Democratic Construction Association, China Association for Promoting Democracy, Chinese Peasants' and Workers' Democratic Party, China Zhi Gong Party, Jiusan Society and Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League.
    1
  26253.  @bartonlee3594  You've been to Singapore before, did you know that it's illegal for Singaporeans to protest? There's this case of a Singapore activist standing outside a police station, while holding a cardboard with a smiley face :-) drawn on it, for just a few seconds to take a photo to show solidarity for climate activists, yet he was arrested by the authorities.
    1
  26254.  @liyuanqian9143  "most Singaporean Chinese would more identify with would be with the Teochews, the Hokkiens, the Cantonese, the Hakkas and the Hainanese," I disagree. Most Chinese in Singapore can speak and understand Mandarin Chinese, but not the dialects of Teochew, Hokkien, Cantonese, Hakka and Hainanese. The Singapore government has also been imposing many restrictions on the other dialects while promoting Mandarin as an official langauge. "from the pre-PRC eras." How is pre-PRC Fujian, Chaozhou, Guangzhou, Hainan island, and the Kejia people, different from post-PRC? Those provinces, cities, island and people are all Chinese regardless of PRC or ROC.
    1
  26255.  @liyuanqian9143  "Shenzhou. the fact that xx% (it has been changing through the years)" Changing by how much? From 74% to 75%? And even if you discount ethnicity, Singapore's political system itself shares much in common with China's, since Singapore adopted meritocracy which originated in ancient China in the form of civil service examinations that scholars sat through to attain their positions. Singapore has also been governed by authoritarian single-party PAP for 58 years much like how China has been governed by the CPC for 74 years. Singapore's Prime Minister Lee has been in power for 19 years (since 2004) far longer than Chinese President Xi been in power for 11 years (since 2012). Therefore, Singapore political system shares much in common with that of China's. "Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations." (Taken from Human Rights Watch: Singapore) Doesn't Singapore's political system sound very much like China's? Even if you discount the percentage of ethnic Chinese in Singapore.
    1
  26256.  @liyuanqian9143  "Shenzhou. the fact that xx% (it has been changing through the years)"_ Changing by how much? From 74% to 75%? And even if you discount ethnicity, Singapore's political system itself shares much in common with China's, since Singapore adopted meritocracy which originated in ancient China in the form of civil service examinations that scholars sat through to attain their positions. Singapore has also been governed by authoritarian single-party PAP for 58 years much like how China has been governed by the CPC for 74 years. Singapore's Prime Minister Lee has been in power for 19 years (since 2004) far longer than Chinese President Xi been in power for 11 years (since 2012). Therefore, Singapore political system shares much in common with that of China's.
    1
  26257.  @liyuanqian9143  "Shenzhou. Singapore's political system has a lot more in common with many other countries than China." Please elaborate. According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore: "Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations." — Human Rights Watch: Singapore That doesn't sound as though Singapore having more in common with other countries in fact it clearly shows that Singapore shares much in common with China's political system. You said: "The longevity of PAP in power is still through General Elections. A very popular Cabinet minister can and did lose in the General Election." Doesn't change the fact that the PAP has been governing Singapore for 58 years much like how China has been governed by the CPC for 74 years. The opposition party in Singapore has never come into power at all for its whole life as a nation.
    1
  26258.  @liyuanqian9143  "What is amusing, for me, is that I think the PRC leaders and citizens are more keen to learn from Singapore than anyone from Singapore to learn from PRC on running the government." Because Singapore adopted meritocracy which originated in ancient China in the form of civil service examinations that scholars sat through to attain their positions. If anything, it's more accurate to say Singapore had adopted the ancient Chinese form of governance. Singapore also retains an authoritarian form of governance under strong central leadership which have been the guiding principles of China's 5,000 years of civilization.
    1
  26259.  @bartonlee3594  "You have been to Singapore! Good. For how long? You must have noticed all the personal freedoms there." I've studied in Singapore for at least a year, and it's basically the same as China. The same personal freedoms in Singapore can pretty much be enjoyed in China as well. Singapore's government clearly doesn't tolerate dissidents like Amos Yee who criticized Singapore's founding father Lee Kuan Yew. Now that I've answered your question, how about you answer mine? Have you ever been to China?
    1
  26260.  @bartonlee3594  Singapore's government doesn't tolerate protests just like when Jolovan Wham was arrested for holding up a placard with a smiley face on it. And the opposition party have never made any significant impact it's PAP that's been ruling Singapore for its entire life as a nation.
    1
  26261.  @bartonlee3594  "AGAIN: Have you ever been to Singapore to any length of time? Ever worked there? LOTS of freedoms. No Draconian laws." No Draconian Laws in Singapore? You can't even chew bubblegum there! Feeding pigeons is a punishable offence there and so is littering. Are you sure you have been to Singapore like you constantly claim you have?
    1
  26262.  @bartonlee3594  No Draconian Laws in Singapore? According to Human Rights Watch World Report 2023: "The Singapore government uses draconian criminal laws and civil defamation suits to harass and prosecute critical voices, including activists, bloggers, and journalists. There is little freedom of assembly. In 2022, after a two-year halt, Singapore resumed executions of death row prisoners, despite widespread international condemnation." – HRW World Report 2023: Singapore Therefore, doesn't Singapore system share more similarities with China's? I seriously doubt that you've been to Singapore given your lack of understanding of the political climate there. Also, since I've answered your question, how about you answer mine? Have you ever been to China?
    1
  26263.  @liyuanqian9143  "Shenzhou. do you really trust the HRW to not only take them at their word," Prove HRW wrong then. You claimed Singapore's political system has a lot more in common with many other countries than China, but refuse to elaborate, whereas I've shown Singapore has been governed by authoritarian single-party PAP for 58 years much like China has been under the CPC for 74 years. Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has been in power for 19 years (since 2004). All the other nation's leaders that assumed office in 2004 has since stepped down, so how is Singapore's political system similar to many other countries than China?
    1
  26264.  @liyuanqian9143  "Shenzhou. do you really trust the HRW to not only take them at their word," Prove HRW wrong then. You claimed Singapore's political system has a lot more in common with many other countries than China, but refuse to elaborate, whereas I've shown Singapore has been governed by authoritarian single-party PAP for 58 years much like China has been under the CPC for 74 years. How then is Singapore's political system similar to many other countries than China? "large segments of the population were banned from even taking the Imperial Examinations - based on their social backgrounds, or professions or simply because someone from their families had been deemed guilty of a crime." That's precisely the same sort of meritocracy practiced by Singapore. Under Singapore's constitution, a person who is convicted of an offence and sentenced to at least a year's jail or a fine is disqualified from politics. Opposition member John Tan, the vice-chairman of Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) has been disqualified from running in politics.
    1
  26265.  @liyuanqian9143  "large segments of the population were banned from even taking the Imperial Examinations - based on their social backgrounds, or professions or simply because someone from their families had been deemed guilty of a crime." Under Singapore's constitution, a person who is convicted of an offence and sentenced to at least a year's jail or a fine is disqualified from politics. As a result, John Tan, the vice-chairman of Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) has been disqualified from running in politics. You said: "On the other hand, scions of the senior court officials were granted exemption from the exams and pre-qualified for official appointments." Exactly how you would describe Singapore's current Prime Minister, Lee Hsien Loong, who is granted exemption from the son of the Singapore's founding father, Lee Kuan Yew. So doesn't Singapore's meritocracy is derived from the ancient meritocracy that originated in ancient China.
    1
  26266.  @bartonlee3594  "You could talk openly about any topic with colleagues." Could you perhaps make a derogatory remark directed towards, let's say, the Malay people, without getting arrested? Or hold a placard with a smiley face on it in front of a police station without getting arrested, like what Jolovan Wham did? You said: "I was in Beijing about three months before the Tiananmen Square massacre." Turns out the massacre was a myth. According to cables from Wikileaks, there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square on June 1989. A diplomat from Chile (Carlos Gallo) and his wife, provided eyewitness account that there was no mass firing of weapons into the crowds and that the police entering the square were armed with riot gear – truncheons and wooden clubs.
    1
  26267.  @bartonlee3594  "Shenzhou. That gum chewing law, etc., is not "Draconian". I'm talking about real freedoms. Personal freedoms." Chewing gum is a personal freedom of the individual, how is the banning of it not Draconian? You said: "Lee Kuan Yew was openly tolerant of gay rights," Lee Kuan Yew did not tolerate any political dissent. Lee Mau Seng was wrongly imprisoned in Singapore from 1970 to 1973 and Lee Kuan Yew only allowed his released if he was exiled to Canada. The Internal Security Act empowered him to arrest political rivals and dissenters after deeming them as national threats. For example, Tang Fong Har, now living in Hong Kong, who was among 22 people detained in 1987 for allegedly being part of a Marxist plot against the Singaporean government.
    1
  26268.  @bartonlee3594  "This romantic view of the ancient imperial past and so-called 'meritocracy' then is typical of nationalists everywhere." Singapore's meritocracy is also romanticized, when in actuality it follows the same principles of ancient Chinese meritocracy. Under Singapore's constitution, a person who is convicted of an offence and sentenced to at least a year's jail is disqualified from politics. As a result, John Tan, the vice-chairman of Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) has been disqualified from running in politics. (Incidentally, John Tan had gotten his offense just for making a statement about Jolovan Wham, the man who held a placard with a smiley face in front of a police station.)
    1
  26269.  @bartonlee3594  You said: "Singapore has an incredible arts scene." A 34-year-old Singapore performance artist had to serve a two-week jail sentence for what he and his supporters consider a peaceful one-man protest. Seelan Palay was sentenced by a Singaporean court on October 3 following a performance titled 32 Years: The Interrogation of A Mirror, commemorating Singapore’s longest-held political prisoner, Chia Thye Poh, who spent 32 years in detention until his release in 1998. But hey, you're just going to once again use the stale excuse: "the police get ornery there sometimes."
    1
  26270.  @liyuanqian9143  You said: "LHL ran and won in an election as a candidate, just like any other candidate." Exactly who voted for Lee Hsien Loong to be Prime Minister of Singapore? Did the ordinary people of Singapore vote for LHL as a candidate, or was he appointed into his position? You said: "There's no law providing for son of a PM To automatically become MP even, much less PM." Of course no government will explicitly state such a law, but the fact remains that the LHL is the son of a PM, who became PM himself. And you said LHL won in an election to become PM? Did the ordinary people of Singapore vote for LHL as a candidate, or was he appointed into his position? You said: "Interesting that now you are claiming Singapore practices nepotism instead of meritocracy." I've never claimed that, I said many times that Singapore practices meritocracy which originated in ancient China. You choose to "redefine" ancient China's meritocracy differently so you're the one making such claims about nepotism then. You said: "there's a difference from being barred from office when you're the criminal versus when the criminal is your father or grandfather or uncle etc." The children of Singaporean dissidents (i.e Francis Seow) certainly can't run for office in Singapore, since their father holds a criminal record.
    1
  26271.  @liyuanqian9143  "Shenzhou. I don't have any obligation to rebut HRW. Singapore government does it regularly" So instead of thinking critically for yourself, you rather just let the Singapore government do all the talking? Being an authoritarian single-party state itself, Singapore government will of course attempt to portray itself as the opposite, but through the various cases I've pointed out, the fact is that Singapore's political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. "Most governments selectively quote HRW reports about other countries and ignores reports about their own." Which governments are you referring to?
    1
  26272.  @liyuanqian9143  "Shenzhou. you're the one who chose to ignore Singapore having free and fair elections" According to Freedom House, Singapore's elections are unfair due to the advantages enjoyed by the incumbent party, including a progovernment media sector, the GRC system, high financial barriers to electoral candidacy, and legal restrictions on free speech. You said: "Your grabbing on the "similar" outcome of longevity in government is no different from claiming that two men are the same when one earns money honestly while the other is a robber." Speaking of robbers, Singapore's PM Lee Hsien Loong draws the highest salary of any world leader at a whopping $1,641,791 annually and this has been going on for 19 years (since he came to power in 2004) so who's really robbing who here? Even Chinese President Xi Jinping receives a salary of just $27,520 per year.
    1
  26273.  @liyuanqian9143  "Shenzhou. you're the one who chose to ignore Singapore having free and fair elections" According to Freedom House, Singapore's elections are unfair due to the advantages enjoyed by the incumbent party, including a progovernment media sector, the GRC system, high financial barriers to electoral candidacy, and legal restrictions on free speech. You said: "Your grabbing on the "similar" outcome of longevity in government is no different from claiming that two men are the same when one earns money honestly while the other is a robber." Singapore's PM Lee Hsien Loong draws the highest salary of any world leader at a whopping $1,641,791 annually and this has been going on for 19 years (since he came to power in 2004) which makes people wonder who is the real robber.
    1
  26274.  @michaelyuan3382  You said: "The Qing Dynasty was Manchurian and not Chinese" After conquering China proper, the Manchus identified their state as "China", equivalently as 中國; Zhōngguó; 'middle kingdom' in Chinese and Dulimbai Gurun in Manchu. The emperors equated the lands of the Qing state as "China" in both the Chinese and Manchu languages, defining China as a multi-ethnic state, and rejecting the idea that only Han areas were properly part of "China". The government used "China" and "Qing" interchangeably to refer to their state in official documents. So the Qing Dynasty (大清) was most certainly Chinese.
    1
  26275.  @michaelyuan3382  "re-education or mass extermination concentration camps under a genocidal regime." Mainlanders consider the people in Taiwan as part of the same family, why would mainland China even consider mass extermination of our fellow Chinese brethren. Go ahead and ask any mainlander whether he or she considers the people of Taiwan as family and virtually everyone will say yes. You said: "Taiwan has also never been part of any China except the Republic of China under the KMT, which is not the PRC of current mainland China." Taiwan was part of the Qing Dynasty China (which is Chinese according to the Manchus who ruled it as I've explained previously) and even the term Republic of China gives away the fact that the island is a province of China. The 1972 Shanghai Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position.
    1
  26276.  @bartonlee3594  I quoted cables from then Chilean diplomat (Carlos Gallo) and his wife on a visit to Tiananmen Square in June 1989, and providing eyewitness testimony to the events unfolding there. How's that a conspiracy theory?
    1
  26277.  @liyuanqian9143  "Shenzhou. son of Francis Seow did." What's the name of the son of Francis Seow who ran for office in Singapore?
    1
  26278.  @liyuanqian9143  The fact of the matter is that Lee Hsien Loong was appointed into his position by the President of Singapore, yet why'd you claim earlier that LHL ran and won in an election as a candidate, just like any other candidate?
    1
  26279.  @bartonlee3594  "Shenzhou. Of course you can. It happens all the time." Why was Jolovan Wham was arrested for holding up a placard with a smiley face on it then?
    1
  26280.  @liyuanqian9143  You specifically said that Lee Hsien Loong ran and won in an election as a candidate, just like any other candidate, but what was the election result? Was he voted into power by the ordinary people of Singapore (as a candidate, like you said) or was he appointed by the President of Singapore?
    1
  26281. 老实说翻墙之后就觉得，西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  26282.  @bartonlee3594  I've often heard you boasting about freedoms that you have in the west, so how could have your response been censored?
    1
  26283.  @liyuanqian9143  Who elects the Prime Minister of Singapore? According to Prime Ministers Office Singapore: The Prime Minister of Singapore is appointed by the President of Singapore under Article 25 of the Constitution. Yet you claim LHL ran and won in an election as a candidate, just like any other candidate? When you can't even tell me the election result?
    1
  26284.  @bartonlee3594  The owner of the channel reserves the right to remove comments that are inflammatory, malicious, depicting graphic violence, etc. That's part of YouTube's community guidelines after all.
    1
  26285. ​ @bartonlee3594  "He only quotes directly from the Party Line here." I quoted Singapore's Prime Minister's Office, which states that the Prime Minister of Singapore is appointed by the President of Singapore under Article 25 of the Constitution. This clearly contradicts the other guy's claim that LHL ran and won in an election as a candidate, just like any other candidate. "He is not a free-thinker." I don't follow any religions nor would I consider myself an atheist. Agnostic is probably the term I would identify myself most with.
    1
  26286. ​ @bobsmith3983  Mongolia is sandwiched between two powers that it has interwoven history with. Being a landlocked country also means Mongolia lacks access to ports for trade, and would need to rely on other means of development. Mongolia made a wise decision joining China's Belt and Road Initiative to improve its trade connectivity.
    1
  26287.  @bartonlee3594  Here's some of your earlier posts where you simply nodded in agreement. jordie4423 True liyuanqian9143 Good points. josejose1988 I AGREE. RedXlV Very true. elsagelympne7943 Good point. liyuanqian9143 True. liyuanqian9143 True. michaelyuan3382 Excellent points, Michael. liyuanqian9143 I agree. liyuanqian9143 That's a fact. ... If anything it looks as though you're the one stuck in an echo-chamber of your own making.
    1
  26288.  @bartonlee3594  Seems like you don't even know what you mean by echo-chamber yourself. When someone keeps on nodding in agreement with others who share their point of view, then they're stuck in an echo-chamber. That's precisely what you are doing when you keep on saying "True", "Good points", "I agree", "Excellent points", "That's a fact" and so on.
    1
  26289. 老实说翻墙之后就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  26290.  @bartonlee3594  "Shenzhou. yes, nodding in agreement is often bad." Yet that's precisely what you're doing. Most of your posts begin with "True", "Good points", "I agree", "Excellent points", "That's a fact" and various other expressions of agreement. So have you considered the fact that perhaps you're the one stuck in an echo-chamber of you're own making?
    1
  26291. Most of us would be lost in MSM misinformation, if it weren't for you Brian. It's nearly impossible to find accurate assessements of the real situation unfolding in Europe. Perhaps the best estimate is to look at mainstream misinformation and just take the opposite as true. For example, if Western MSM says Putin is sending more troops to its border with Ukraine, just take it as Putin is pulling troops from the border instead.
    1
  26292.  antwinettec  Besides masks and ventilators, China is also producing the protective clothing for healthcare workers. Video: Chinese companies speed up up protecting clothing production youtu.be/yDOPezgxk3A Many companies across China have been fully devoted to the production of masks and protective clothing, to ensure an adequate supply of necessary materials in the battle again the novel coronavirus epidemic.
    1
  26293.  antwinettec  Video: China: Shanghai mask factory ramps up production as demand skyrockets due to coronavirus youtu.be/8q3sAcS8kOs
    1
  26294.  antwinettec  Technological innovation has enabled a company in Guangdong to produce 1,000 face masks in one minute. Video: Ultra-high-speed Mask Production Line Put into Use in south China City youtube.com/watch?v=_jWt-4YKBq4
    1
  26295.  antwinettec  Video: Positive Vibes | 1,000 masks per minute: World's fastest mask-making machine now in operation youtu.be/8zrs4MYgMBc The world's fastest mask making machine was put into operation producing 1,000 protective masks per minute. It's expected to produce more than 1.2 million masks daily with the machine running round the clock.
    1
  26296.  antwinettec  Video: Production process of medical masks! China Mask production full firepower youtu.be/_WZeqQewOk4
    1
  26297.  antwinettec  I heard that USA healthcare workers are suffering from a lack of masks, PPE equipment and ventilators. Video: Coronavirus: US unemployment surges, Spain confirms 10,000 dead youtu.be/zb8jJEqboew
    1
  26298.  @abdoul.mb.5294  America is actually dependent on China for almost 80% of its medicines, which is especially important given the current situation. Source: U.S. is Dependent on China for Almost 80% of Its Medicine saraacarter.com/u-s-is-dependent-on-china-for-almost-80-of-its-medicine/ Fox Business reports that according to FDA estimate at least 80 percent of active ingredients found in all of America’s medicine come from abroad, primarily from China. And it’s not just the ingredients, China wants to become the world’s dominant generic drug maker. So far Chinese companies are making generic for everything from high blood pressure to chemotherapy drugs. 90 percent of America’s prescriptions are for generic drugs.
    1
  26299.  @abdoul.mb.5294  "Communist" China can churn out face masks better than "Capitalist" USA. Video: Over 8 million masks produced in China per day, production to expand youtu.be/VhFke--99cQ
    1
  26300.  @abdoul.mb.5294  About Intellectual Property, China applies for more patents than any other country in the world and we also have the world's largest number of granted patents, according to World Intellectual Property Indicators. Patent applications for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (1,542,002 patents) 2. United States (597,141 patents) 3. Japan (313,567 patents) 4. South Korea (209,992 patents) 5. European Patent Office (174,397 patents) 6. Germany (67,898 patents) ... Source: World Intellectual Property Indicators wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Indicators#Patents Patent grants for the top 10 offices, 2018 1. China (432,147 patents) 2. United States (307,759 patents) 3. Japan (194,525 patents) 4. European Patent Office (127,603 patents) 5. South Korea (119,012 patents) 6. Russian Federation (35,774 patents) ...
    1
  26301.  @porlae  The crew of a US aircraft carrier has become infected with Covid-19 (the vessel spent months at sea, so how did they contract Covid-19?) and the brave captain was dismissed for notifying US government of the virus infection. Video: U.S. Navy fires captain who sought help for virus-stricken ship youtu.be/Im18TI4uuWQ So was he prosecuted for being a whistle-blower in the US?
    1
  26302.  @porlae  Why do you resort to hurling personal insults against me for my views? Just because my views happen to differ from yours? Granted, the Chinese Communist Party is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  26303.  @leonardmsong1635  Orders for ventilators are pouring in and China is working 24/7 making ventilators. Video: China is working 24/7 to make ventilators youtu.be/kJ81HY_M-zI Ventilators can determine if some Covid-19 patients live or die. Doctors from Italy to the US desperately need them and orders at factories are pouring in. "There's literally no country in the world that doesn't want to buy a ventilator from China right now. We have tens of thousands of orders waiting. The issue is how fast we can make them." - Li Kai, Director of Beijing Aeonmed
    1
  26304.  @scholae9199  You Singaporeans refused to wear mask when going out, now Singapore is see 300-400 cases of infection and Beijing is offering masks to Chinese nationals in Singapore. Source: Coronavirus: Beijing offers Chinese nationals in Singapore face masks and support amid crisis scmp.com/week-asia/health-environment/article/3079055/coronavirus-beijing-offers-chinese-nationals-singapore The Chinese embassy has reached out to its citizens - from students to members of business groups - to assuage concerns as infections in the city-state spike
    1
  26305. 棒子在吃醋。
    1
  26306.  @nulnoh219  You said: "anytime a bigger nation is trying to take territory via military might, we HAVE to make our positions very clear." So if a smaller nation does the same then it's okay? Seems like you're just exhibiting a small nation complex onto the situation in Ukraine without actually understanding the historical background that led to the conflict in Ukraine. "If not IF and WHEN it happens here, we'll have nothing to stand on." You're saying that the same thing is going to happen around Singapore? Which bigger nation is going to take Singapore's territory via military might? It's like you're just projecting Singapore's situation onto Ukraine without truly understanding the situation. Like comparing apples to oranges.
    1
  26307.  @Arnsteel634  Even the United States acknowledges the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26308. Chinese government is reviving the old "Mandate of Heaven" doctrine, in which a competent leader is allowed to remain in power, to maximise the benefits to China, while an incompetent leader will eventually be overthrown by rebellion.
    1
  26309. The Koreans themselves protest US THAAD deployment on Korean soil by shaving heads and clash with police. Sources: No to THAAD: S. Koreans protest, sue military over US missile deployment plan rt.com/news/378881-thaad-protests-south-korea/ South Koreans shave heads to protest U.S. missile defense system reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-thaad-protest-idUSKCN10Q0U0
    1
  26310. During the 2020 Presidential Election, did Cyrus Janssen voted for Biden?
    1
  26311.  @jjay461  Well, then sad to say, Cyrus Janssen is one of those 81 million voters responsible for bringing Joe Biden to power as POTUS.
    1
  26312.  @jjay461  I posed the question to Cyrus in another post here (Jayoe Nation's post:youtube.com/watch?v=t_0ddUQipnI&lc=UgyKOLOXCBmcyKWM0aB4AaABAg.9Rw93cJNJEM9S0Y5WR8SgT ) and he replied: "神州 Shenzhou I did not vote in the 2020 election as I could not support either candidate"
    1
  26313. What makes you think his wife and daughter are in danger at all? His husbandless wife will now be cared for by the CCP, and the daughter would be sent to a Chinese school for education, and presumably grow up without a father of her own.
    1
  26314. +Dumbledores Army If the West accuse China of such, then where is the proof? You managed to get video of Tahir's Chinese Agent (and even got footage of China's Uighurs education schools) but have no proof of human rights abuses?
    1
  26315. +Dumbledores Army What makes you think that in certain positions there were never be Uighurs and never will be Uighurs? Its a matter of fact that the literacy rate of Uighurs in Xinjiang is rather low (maybe 40%) so Uighurs have a harder time attaining senior position in the CCP. But by educating Uighurs in schools and preparing for the workforce, Uighurs can start lifting themselves out of poverty, hopefully more educated Uighurs join the Communist Party and help make Xinjiang better through their policies. But unless Uighur literacy rates increase, then Uighurs will remain trapped in a cycle of uneducated, and possibly turning to radical terrorism. But why should China take that chance, no matter how small? Why not spend money to educate these Uighurs to help them find a job, and take their mind away from terrorist thoughts and tendencies?
    1
  26316. +Dumbledores Army LOL what Uighur intellectuals are you talking about? Do you see any Uighur doctors or lawyers in the footage of those education centres? Why would such educated people learn skills to work in a factory? Most of the Uighur diaspora living outside China haven't even been to China or Xinjiang so what makes you think they know what is happening in China? You said so yourself that they are living outside of China so how do they even know what is happening inside China?
    1
  26317. +Dumbledores Army Seriously, can you even give the name(s) of the Uighur doctor(s) who was(were) supposedly detained? Or are you just shooting your mouth off and blatantly making up lies without proof?
    1
  26318. +Dumbledores Army The truth is that you have no such names of Uighur doctors being detained, and its very clear that you are spouting nonsense and making up lies with no proof to back up your claims.
    1
  26319. I watched Oliver Stone's 2019 documentary, Revealing Ukraine (available on YT) where Oliver interviewed Medvedchuk and his wife, and it turns out that Putin is godfather to his children. He's a politician no doubt, but he seems to really care about his country and what Western powers did to de-industrialize Ukraine. Just search the documentary title here on YT for people wanting to know more about him.
    1
  26320. Many Chinese warmly welcome Westerners to lands as visitors (just ask the expats here). However, many Westerners (but not all) are increasingly viewing Chinese in their lands as unwelcome.
    1
  26321. Yes, masks should be compulsory. We now have more information about the coronavirus, that there's a possibility for asymptomatic infection (displaying no obvious symptoms despite contracting the virus) so you might be harboring the virus and spreading it unknowingly.
    1
  26322.  @mypahrizal335  Bat meat isn't even sold at that market in Wuhan, its a "Seafood" Market, not a "Bat Meat" market, so how is bat soup even linked to the coronavirus outbreak? Here's another source debunking the bat-soup coronavirus origins myth. Source: No, Coronavirus Was Not Caused by 'Bat Soup'–But Here's What Researchers Think May Be to Blame health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/coronavirus-bat-soup
    1
  26323.  @mypahrizal335  Here's another source debunking the dogs, snakes, bats, rats being sold at Wuhan Seafood Market. Source: Are there really dogs, snakes, rats and bats for sale at the Wuhan market where coronavirus originated? observers.france24.com/en/20200204-china-debunked-coronavirus-dogs-snakes-rats-bats-wuhan-market-indonesia
    1
  26324. If the leader has proven to be capable of leading the country, then I personally see nothing wrong with leaving him in power, to maximize the benefits to China. A competent leader should be left in power to implement his changes, while an incompetent leader will eventually be overthrown by rebellion.
    1
  26325. It's because they continue to live in the post-Soviet Union dissolution era, where they viewed themselves victorious, no longer faced any opposition from an equal power and could do whatever they want. They fail to understand how much the world has changed since then.
    1
  26326.  @naptimusnapolyus1227  Western countries have been polluting the Earth since 200-300 years ago, during the Industrial Revolution in 1700-1800s. Whereas China only recently industrialised some 50 years ago since the 1970s.
    1
  26327.  @kinosyk  Remember that China only industrialised some 40 years ago, whereas the West industrialised 200-300 years ago since the Industrial Revolution in 1700-1800s.
    1
  26328.  @ianhj4550  Remember, China only industrialised some 40 years ago, whereas the West industrialisation began hundreds of years ago, back during the Industrial Revolution.
    1
  26329.  @garryrichardson4572  Where did you hear it? The population of Uighurs and Tibetans in China have increased nearly fourfold over the decades.
    1
  26330.  @RoobieRhoo  Apart from the South China Sea and East China Sea, have Chinese warships been spotted in say North American waters? Then how exactly does the PLA Navy project power globally?
    1
  26331.  @viper2148  The coronavirus lab origins have long been debunked by experts. Source: No, the coronavirus wasn’t made in a lab. A genetic analysis shows it’s from nature sciencenews.org/article/coronavirus-covid-19-not-human-made-lab-genetic-analysis-nature
    1
  26332.  @knowitall5913  Why is pointing out how the anti-China sentiment is brewing in the West, considered evil?
    1
  26333.  @MarkYeung1  The problem is that Australia has let their anti-China sentiment erupt into anti-Asian racist attacks against Asian Australians. Asian-Australians have reported almost 400 racist attacks since the beginning of the pandemic according to the country's leading survey of anti-China racism. Osmond Chiu, a fellow at independent progressive thinktank Per Capita, authored the survey in collaboration with the Asian Australian Alliance and Being Asian Australian. "There definitely has been an increase," he said, noting that compared to similar data from the United States, there have been a higher proportion of racist incidents against Asian-Australians than Asian-Americans. Source: Almost 400 anti-China attacks since pandemic began smh.com.au/politics/federal/almost-400-anti-china-attacks-since-pandemic-began-20200607-p550a8.html The survey, which started on April 2 and will be completed this month, has so far documented 386 racist incidents, including abuse, physical intimidation and spitting. The survey also revealed that roughly 90 per cent of racist incidents were not being reported to police and the vast majority were perpetrated by strangers in public places.
    1
  26334.  @MarkYeung1  Nike and H&M both claimed that there are forced labour in Xinjiang cotton industry, but Uighurs workers drive cotton-harvesting tractors and harvest truckloads of cotton in Xinjiang, yet Western allegations of forced labour in Xinjiang cotton still persist? Video: Xinjiang, China’s top cotton producer youtu.be/ocVn5Cn101M Whereas US companies like Sketchers actually bothered to conduct 2 audits on their cotton factory in Xinjiang and found no evidence of forced labour. Whereas H&M and Nike didn't bother to conduct audits. Source: US footwear brand Skechers: no evidence of Xinjiang 'forced labor' chinadaily.com.cn/a/202103/26/WS605da713a31024ad0bab1e7b.html Then why should Chinese buyers continue to support Nike and H&M when they didn't bother to investigate their own cotton facilities in Xinjiang? Chinese would rather support our own local Xinjiang cotton (arguably the finest cotton quality in the world).
    1
  26335.  @MarkYeung1  The NBA boycott was because the Houston Rockets' manager tweeted "Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong." then why can't Chinese boycott an organization that supports violent riots in Hong Kong (where protestors threw stones at 65-year old Hong Kong man and killed him, as well as dousing a man in flammable liquid and setting him on fire)? As for Vitasoy, they expressed condolences to the family of a man who stabbed a Hong Kong police officer and then killed himself, then can't Chinese boycott companies that support lone-wolf terrorists? With Canada, the main issue between China and Canada is Canada's arrest of Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou, that's causing relations between China and Canada to deteriorate. Former President Trump already publicly stated that USA is willing to use Meng's arrest as a "bargaining chip" against China, even the new Biden administration hasn't uttered a word regarding Meng's arrest to Trudeu, so can't Trudeu see that USA is only using Canada to serve US interests (at the expense of China-Canada relations)?
    1
  26336.  @MarkYeung1  If you truly care about China's image, then you should be trying to spread awareness of China's achievements in order to counteract the anti-China propaganda in the West in denouncing China's success.
    1
  26337.  @MarkYeung1  Source: Overwhelming Majority Of Canadians Want Boycott On Chinese Products spencerfernando.com/2020/06/29/overwhelming-majority-of-canadians-want-boycott-on-chinese-products/ A new survey by Angus Reid shows more evidence of how Canadians have turned against China. According to the poll, a whopping 81% of Canadians want a boycott on Chinese goods, saying “Canadian consumers should try to avoid buying things made in China.” Just 19% are opposed. People across all age groups support a boycott, with 74% in support among Canadians aged 18-34, 82% among Canadians aged 35-54, and 86% among those age 55 and above.
    1
  26338. Video: China donated 1,000 ventilators to US, says New York governor youtu.be/x_D5Ggj69Rw
    1
  26339.  @Andy-P  The problem is that just because those countries "share common values and rally around America" doesn't necessarily mean that America reciprocate. The Trump Administration thrust "American Exceptionalism" into the spotlight, making America all about itself, while neglecting it's so-called "allies". The Biden Administration appear to reaffirm its relations but with its allies, but the U.S actions remains the same, by prioritizing U.S interests over that of its allies. In that sense, the U.S allies are more like vassal states of America instead of true allies.
    1
  26340.  @Andy-P  If your so-called ally choose to prioritize their own interests over yours (i.e USA prioritize the U.S interests over their allies) then what's the point in continuing such a harmful alliance? For example, when the Biden Ddministration declared that they will not be sending officials to the Beijing Olympics, the rest of the 5 Eyes countries (Australia, Britain, Canada, NZ) all jump on the boycott bandwagon. Now the Biden Administration is sending at least 18 officials to attend the games in Beijing, then how are the rest of the 5 Eyes countries going to explain their reasons for boycotting the Olympics diplomatically? The U.S is literally taking their allies for a ride here.
    1
  26341.  @Andy-P  What Communist Party expansionist? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is the real threat to global peace and stability here. And while USA did help the allies during WWII, the USA today is more about putting U.S interests ahead of its allies, so why do it's allies continue to call USA its ally? Because of lingering "WWII sentiment" even when U.S policies are actively harming its allies interests? However I agree with your statement that "When in an alliance you act together and help each other - else it's not much of an alliance." because in the U.S case, the USA doesn't care about its allies (Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand, European countries, etc) interests, they put U.S interests ahead of its allies many times. Like in Russia/Ukraine issue for example, the US doesn't care about many NATO countries that import gas from Russia, they are putting American interests first.
    1
  26342.  @Andy-P  Indian PM Narendra Modi has publicly stated that "Chinese troops did not enter Indian territory and no posts were taken in Ladakh". Several Indian media outlets reported his words on YouTube: Video: No One Entered Indian Territory: PM Narendra Modi's Big Message To China Over LAC Standoff (By India Today) Video: ‘China didn’t enter our territory…’: PM Modi at all-party meet on Ladakh clash (by Hindustan Times) As for the South China Sea, China first claimed the SCS Islands back when the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) published the 11 Dash Line map (in which the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 later removed two dashes to become the 9 Dash Line map). Back then, nobody objected to China's claims, not the Philippines, not the Vietnamese, not even the USA. America send warships like the USS Decker to help ROC recover the SCS islands from the Japanese, and the warship was renamed ROCS Tai Ping under the Chinese navy. One of the SCS Islands (Itu Aba) was renamed Taiping island in honor of the ship that liberated it from Japan. About the East China Sea, the Diaoyu Islands were originally part of China but was taken and occupied by the Japanese during the war. After the Japanese surrendered at the end of WWII, they relinquished all their occupied territory, yet why wasn't Diaoyu Islands returned back to China? As for the proposed invasion of Taiwan, if you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Since Taiwan is part of China, then how can China invade ourselves?
    1
  26343.  @Andy-P  Taiwan is not a country, it's part of China. Even Taiwan's constitution says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution all these years, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. So how can China invade ourselves? You said that the mainland might invade Taiwan, but do have evidence to suggest such a possibility? Is there a build-up of People's Liberation Army troops at the Taiwan strait, like the build-up of Russian troops at its border with Ukraine? If not, then why are you claiming that China is expansionist based off a suggestion? And I have previously refuted your other points, with Indian PM Modi stating that Chinese troops did not enter Indian territory at Ladakh. But the original topic is why the US allies blindly form an alliance with the USA, when the USA prioritise their own US interests over those of its allies? That's not how alliances work, the relationship between USA and its allies is more akin to them being vassal states of America.
    1
  26344.  @michaelkatz275  It's no secret today that U.S-China relations have deteriorated to their lowest levels in many decades and the possibility of a hot conflict erupting between USA and China would not only be deleterious to both our countries but for the whole world as well. What Cyrus is doing is promoting understanding of China to Western audiences so as to clear up misunderstandings.
    1
  26345.  @michaelkatz275  Australia, British, Canada are being influenced by the US anti-China policy. Look at when the Biden administration announced that USA will not be sending officials to attend the Olympics in Beijing, the rest of the 5 Eyes countries jumped on the boycott bandwagon. But now USA is sending at least 18 officials to attend the Olympics in Beijing, then why'd the other 5 Eyes countries just blindly follow the USA? The USA is taking its allies for a ride.
    1
  26346.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou The one China is a policy that one day could change. Like one day Taiwan may choose to join China" Do you even understand what the One China policy is? It states that both ROC 🇹🇼 and PRC 🇨🇳 agree that there is only One China, and Taiwan is a part of China, so the only way the One China policy could change is if Taiwan declares independence. So if the priority is to prevent WWIII, then why is the USA interfering in Mainland China's internal affairs in Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Taiwan? The USA is interfering in China's internal affairs in hopes of provoking WWIII, and U.S allies are acting as accomplices. And again, since there is no PLA troop buildup in Taiwan Strait (unlike the Russian troop buildup at it's border with Ukraine) then why'd you claim mainland China is expansionist and going to invade Taiwan? How is Australia a vassal state if it gives in to the 14 Grievances? The 14 Grievances represent China's grievances in the Australia-China relationship, and China is open to negotiate with Australia over these grievances to arrive at mutually acceptable conditions by both sides, how is that paying tribute and making Australia a vassal state of China? If anything Australia is behaving like a vassal state of the USA, given that they willingly tore up a multibillion-dollar submarine contract with France in order to acquire nuclear submarines from the United States through AUKUS. Also you know the since China banned Australian coal, the U.S coal shipments to China actually increased, so how is USA treating its allies like Australia well?
    1
  26347.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou The democratically Australian government does what is best for its' citizens." Are you sure that the democratically elected Australian government does what is best for its' citizens? Australia is located closer to Asia than America or Europe, and China is Australia's biggest trading partner, how is Australian government antagonizing China beneficial to Australia? As for AUKUS, Australia can't fuel, maintain or deploy nuclear subs, that means Scott Morrison has chained Australia's long-term defense policy to the U.S, then how is this beneficial for it's citizens? As for the One China Policy, even the United States acknowledge the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China since the 1972 Shanghai Communique. Here's an article from The Diplomat entitled: The Shanghai Communique: An American Foreign Policy Success, 45 Years Later On February 28, we celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Shanghai Communique. The 1972 agreement, brokered by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, ended 23 years of diplomatic estrangement between the United States and China, and laid the foundation for a peaceful and prosperous Asia... The Communique was based on America’s acknowledgement that Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait agree there is one China, that Taiwan is a part of China, and that the United States does not challenge that position. ... Source: The Diplomat: The Shanghai Communique: An American Foreign Policy Success, 45 Years Later Also, you've been talking about mainland China attacking Taiwan, but since there's no PLA troop buildup at the Taiwan strait, then where's your evidence to suggest the mainland will attack Taiwan?
    1
  26348.  @Andy-P  There's a AUKUS parody on YouTube that really highlights how the Australian government's decision to tore up a multi-billion dollar submarine contract with the French, without informing them in advance. And by agreeing to purchase U.S nuclear submarines, Scotmo is chaining Australia's long-term defense policy to the U.S, since Australia can't fuel, maintain or deploy nuclear subs. AUKUS is expected to cost Australia some $100 billion dollar, as well as antagonizing relations with Australia's biggest trading partner, China. So since there is no PLA build-up then wheres your evidence that mainland China is going to attack Taiwan? Remember in 2013, Taiwan's Defense Ministry estimated the Chinese government would have the capability to take Taiwan by 2020?
    1
  26349.  @Andy-P   What did USA ever do for Australia? Australia is located closer to Asia than America. Like other Asian countries, they should be trying to balance relations between USA and China, yet Australia is following the U.S anti-China stance and antagonising Australia's biggest trading partner against their own interests. You keep saying that China is influencing Australian democracy, but look at American influence in Australia. 15 out of 20 of Australia's biggest companies are majority-owned by US-based investors and 3 more are at least 25% US-owned. Even so-called Australian think-tanks like ASPI (Australian Strategic Policy Institute) are funded by U.S military corporations like Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon Technologies. It's actually the U.S military industrial complex that's influencing Australia to fear China, in hopes of Australia buying more U.S military weapons (such as nuclear subs). Australia is not a nuclear country, so they will be entirely dependent on the USA for nuclear materials to fuel and maintain their nuclear subs.
    1
  26350.  @Andy-P  What values and interests do Australia and America share? Australia fancies itself as one of the "Big Western Boys" like USA, UK, etc. But Australia's economy is nowhere as powerful, neither is its economy as powerful as those Western countries, yet they want to go toe-to-toe with China, their largest trading partner? And Victor Gao said Australia is a "potential target" for nuclear weapons (and not specifically Chinese) you are just taking his words out of context in order to misrepresent China. Furthermore, Australia choose to buy nuclear submarines from the USA and this raises Australia's nuclear threat level, which is why they might find themselves the target of nuclear weapons. If Australia don't want to be a potential target for nuclear weapons, then just don't buy nuclear subs. Simple. If Australia wants nuclear sub, then naturally the nuclear threat level of Australia is raised, whether they like it or not.
    1
  26351.  @Andy-P  No. It's unlikely Australia would be a target for nuclear weapons, at least from the Chinese side. Because China signed the No-First-Use policy meaning that China will not launch a nuclear strike against any country, unless we are ourselves attacked with nukes. Also, after acquiring a nuclear submarine, it's easy for a non-nuclear country like Australia to develop nuclear weapons of its own, because they already have access to nuclear fuel from the submarines. This raises the nuclear threat level of Australia, such that they might become a possible target of nuclear strikes. Australia brought this upon themselves by buying nuclear subs from the USA, just don't buy nuclear subs if Australia doesn't want to the potential target of nuclear weapons. I mean, look at this constant fearmongering by you, accusing China of being a threat, when there is no PLA troop buildup in the Taiwan Straits, and then claiming mainland China will attack Taiwan in 2023, even though in 2013, Taiwan's Defense Ministry predicted China would take Taiwan by 2020. This is exactly what the US military industrial complex wants, by painting China as the perceived enemy, so that countries buy more U.S weapons.
    1
  26352.  @Andy-P  Where's your statement by mainland China saying it would invade if Taiwan doesn't accept Beijing rule? That's the problem with the West today, it's all fearmongering and making China out to be their perceived enemy. It's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) that's fueling anti-China fears. Since the 19th century, many have grown accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the future, is simply too frightening for many to fathom.
    1
  26353.  @Andy-P  "神州 Shenzhou Xi said he would invade if peaceful negotiations were not successful." When did President Xi said that? Xi Jinping has vowed to realise reunification with Taiwan by peaceful means. “To achieve the reunification of the motherland by peaceful means is most in line with the overall interests of the Chinese nation, including our compatriots in Taiwan,” Xi told a meeting in Beijing commemorating the 110th anniversary of the 1911 revolution that established the first Chinese republic. Xi said: “We [should] adhere to the basic policy of peaceful reunification and one country, two systems; adhere to the one-China principle and the 1992 consensus; and promote the peaceful development of cross-strait relations.” He urged Taiwan to “stand on the right side of history jointly to create the glorious cause of the full reunification and the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation”. Could you show me President's Xi words saying that he would invade if peaceful negotiations were not successful? Otherwise, it just appears that you're hyping up the fear and paranoia against China without evidence and just painting China as the enemy that's all. It's the Red Scare and Yellow Peril mindset that's creating nightmare scenarios in people's minds, just because they can't accept the rise of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China. I mean, if China can someday surpass the United States in the foreseeable future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this goal? Nobody says that Western dominance have to remain on top forever, why should China have to be contained from realizing our full power because of Western arrogance? And the USA is certainly not "rule of law" I mean look at the U.S drone strike in Kabul killing Afghan civilians (including women and children) and yet the U.S Court found that the American General responsible for ordering the attack didn't do anything wrong. That's American "rule of law" for you.
    1
  26354.  @RubiAkito  Such people don't realise the racial connotations behind using a yellow bear with small eyes to refer to a Chinese man.
    1
  26355. The Western MSM made a great sales pitch to convince Wali to fight for Ukraine, only for him to travel there and find out what the real situation is like. Hopefully more people can learn from him to see through the MSM narrative.
    1
  26356. Huawei actually overtook Apple as the 2nd largest smartphone maker after Samsung. Source: Huawei Overtakes Apple to Become Second Biggest Smartphone Maker bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-03/huawei-again-overtakes-apple-as-global-smartphone-market-tanks
    1
  26357.  @liljade2307  You want to talk about weapons? China manufacture our own tanks like the Type 99 main battle tank, which have comparable specs as Russia's T-90 tank and America's M-1 Abrams tank. Does India manufacture a main battle tank of its own?
    1
  26358.  @ramakrishna183  Brahmos missile is supersonic missile, whereas China has hypersonic missiles. China has inducted the world's first operational anti-ship ballistic missile, a "carrier killer" capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, known as the DF-21D. The DF-21D is capable of targeting aircraft carrier strike groups out in the open ocean, from the safety of the land. The DF-21D is launched from land-based mobile launchers and flies high up into the stratosphere, using its advanced maneuverability to avoid interception by anti-missile defenses below, before falling at hypersonic speeds (above Mach 20) The warhead is even capable of terminal guidance, making last minute adjustments to its trajectory just seconds before impact.
    1
  26359.  @ramakrishna183  "神州 Shenzhou how silly your talking about tanks." Why is it silly to talk about tanks? The Himalayan mountainous border is unsuitable for heavy tanks so China developed our very own light tank, for mountainous warfare. The Chinese VT5 light tank was deployed on Tibetan Plateau to satisfactory results, whereas Indian Army don't even have a light tank of their own, yet India wants to enter war with China at the mountainous border region?
    1
  26360.  @ramakrishna183  Where's your evidence that 43 People's Liberation Army soldiers died? The only report is from the US intelligence sources and they estimated 43 casualties, but it doesn't mean that all 43 of them died.
    1
  26361.  @chetansamarth9035  "神州 Shenzhou India is the peace lover." My foot! You Indians fight with Pakistan all the time (over your so-called "Pakistan Occupied Kashmir") what peace are you talking about? Whereas China's People's Liberation Army soldiers haven't seen actual combat experience since 1979, yet you're boasting about India being peace lover?
    1
  26362.  Death Zone  Even the Indian PM Narendra Modi said: "‘China did not enter our territory and no posts taken." at all-party meet on Ladakh clash, so you think People's Liberation Army soldiers entered Indian territory?
    1
  26363.  Eshwar Prabhakar  Why don't India settle their border dispute with Nepal instead of starting another with China? Nepalese policemen open fired and killed 1 Indian near Bihar over India-Nepal border dispute. And Indians complain about the so-called "Pakistan Occupied Kashmir" all the time, why don't India wrest control of Kashmir from Pakistan then?
    1
  26364.  Eshwar Prabhakar  Indian PM Narendra Modi publicly stated that "Chinese troops did not enter Indian territory, and no posts were taken" so why blame China for the dispute?
    1
  26365.  @the_fabulous_p14  India doesn't even have a light tank of their own to fight along the mountainous Himalayan border. Your T90 main battletank won't perform well in mountainous region along China-India border, whereas the People's Liberation Army's Type 15 Light Tank is ideal for mountainous warfare.
    1
  26366.  @the_fabulous_p14  You really think that the USA and Australia actually care about India? They're just using India to stop China's rise as an Asian power, because they want the world to remain dominated by Anglo-Saxons. And China can always rely on Pakistan (our iron brother) to help China defend against Indian aggression.
    1
  26367.  @chrishannis1  Canada is the one who made Huawei CFO a political hostage. Even then President Donald Trump wanted to use Meng's arrest as a "bargaining chip" to negotiate with China from a position of strength, this clearly indicates USA doesn't care about Meng's alleged crimes if they were willing to let her go to get a better deal with China, so isn't Meng Wanzhou the political hostage here?
    1
  26368.  @MarkYeung1  You said China "decoupled" from Australian coal in 2020, yet the blackouts in China occurred one year later in 2021, so it's clearly not because of Australian coal that those blackouts occurred. I've even cited a Western source explaining the reasons behind those blackouts and Australian coal wasn't mentioned as the cause of those blackouts.
    1
  26369.  @MarkYeung1  Whether decoupling is justified or not, you said Janet Yellen said decoupling with China will be disastrous for the United States. However, since Australia is only China's 13th largest trading partner, it's not as disastrous for China to "decouple" (your words) from Australia as you've been led to believe. However, China is Australia's largest trade partner, so decoupling would hurt Australia far more.
    1
  26370.  @MarkYeung1  China imported less coal in 2021, because much of Chinese industries were shut off during 2020. Restarting those industries increased the demand for power, and according BBC, the blackouts were caused by surge in demand for Chinese goods and the factories making them needed a lot of power. Beijing also imposed rules to make the country carbon neutral by 2060 have led to slower coal production, and the government controlled electricity prices so the coal-fired power plants are unwilling to operate at a loss, so they reduced output. ... Source: BBC: China power cuts: What is causing the country's blackouts? There is no mention of Australian coal being the cause of China's blackouts in that BBC article.
    1
  26371.  @MarkYeung1  It clearly made sense for China to import less coal for 2021 than 2020, because many Chinese industries were mostly shut down as a result of the pandemic, so the demand for coal was less. Restarting those industries increased the demand for power, and according BBC, the blackouts were caused by surge in demand for Chinese goods and the factories making them needed a lot of power. Beijing also imposed rules to make the country carbon neutral by 2060 have led to slower coal production, and the government controlled electricity prices so the coal-fired power plants are unwilling to operate at a loss, so they reduced output. ... Source: BBC: China power cuts: What is causing the country's blackouts? Once again there is no mention of Australian coal being the cause of China's blackouts in that article.
    1
  26372.  @MarkYeung1  All I said was that decoupling would hurt Australia far more than China. Also, China eventually recovered from those blackouts, so why should the "Chinese citizens vote out the government for its mistakes?" Was the Texas government voted out for the Texas blackout?
    1
  26373.  @MarkYeung1  Well, is your government accountable for their mistakes? The Canadian Truckers were protesting against the mandate, yet the government just freeze their bank accounts. Whereas Beijing had wanted to roll out a mandate of its own, but cancelled the idea after receiving backlash from online netizens. Yet you still think the West is democratic?
    1
  26374.  @MarkYeung1  The BBC article I mentioned clearly does not mention Australian coal as the cause of the blackouts in China. Another article, this time by The China Project, entitled: The three causes of China’s power outages lists Expensive Coal, Energy Dual-controls, and Supply underperforming as the causes of the power outages. Again, Australian coal is not mentioned anywhere in this article.
    1
  26375.  @deschan2246  Why don't you explain the concept here? All you seemingly done it make illogical claims without citing sources that's all. You can't refute my points so you start claiming that I don't understand the concept?
    1
  26376.  @deschan2246  China publishes more scientific and technical journal articles in physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences, than even the United States. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_scientific_and_technical_journal_articles In 2016: 1. China (426,165 articles) <-- 2. United States (408,985 articles) 3. India (110,320 articles) 4. Germany (103,122 articles) 5. United Kingdom (97,527 articles) 6. Japan (96,536 articles) This implies that a growing number of scientific discoveries are being made in Chinese-language papers. So Chinese researchers hold the advantage here because they have access to Western English language research papers, but Western scientists might have difficulty with Chinese-language papers because of the language barrier.
    1
  26377.  @deschan2246  China is home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight and Tianhe-2 and in the 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source: China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in the field of computational science, and are used for a wide range of computationally intensive tasks in various fields, including quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion). This means Chinese researchers have access to some of the world's most advanced facilities to conduct their research.
    1
  26378.  @deschan2246  Chinese inventions are still being used today. With Chinese paper came inventions like paper banknotes, which facilitated faster business transactions, since merchants don't have to carry around lots of heavy metal coinage and precious gems. With Paper came paper books, paper scrolls, paper lanterns, kites (which helped humans understand flight as well as in Franklin's kite experiment) and also the world's first hot-air balloons, in the form of Sky Lanterns (天灯) or Kongming Lanterns (孔明灯) Here is video of people in modern Las Vegas celebrating RISE Lantern festival with Chinese Sky Lanterns (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience) youtube.com/watch?v=SNtwlBbBdb4&t=10
    1
  26379.  @deschan2246  Ancient Chinese also invented weapons like the crossbow (which helped untrained medieval European peasants to fight against skilled archers) and siege weapons like the triple bow ballistae and the traction trebuchet. Besides inventing gunpowder, Chinese also invented handcannons, handgrenades, fragmentation bombs, landmines, naval mines, exploding cannonballs, rocket launchers, multi-launch rocket systems and of course, fireworks. Americans celebrate the 4th of July with Chinese fireworks, and there was even an ancient Chinese flamethrower capable of launching continuous stream of flame (the first of its kind) which must have been a fearsome sight to behold in the ancient battlefield. Video: Ancient Chinese Flamethrower youtube.com/watch?v=goi-FVnTD5Y&t=915
    1
  26380.  @companyheroes8120  Why is it stupid to use what happened in the past to predict the future? History is the best teacher, and history has much to teach if only you would listen to it. So why is it stupid to use history?
    1
  26381.  @deschan2246  China is world's 3rd country to launch space stations into orbit, besides USA and USSR. China's first prototype space station, Tiangong-1 (天宫一号) was launched in 2011, followed by Tiangong-2 in 2016. A Chinese taikonaut even conducted a "space lecture" from onboard Tiangong-1 directly to her kids on the ground below and demonstrated simple micro-gravity experiments in space to them. Video: Chinese teacher in space gives lecture to her kids on the ground youtube.com/watch?v=OUAuZnpoZ58 Through this, we are telling our kids and future generations of Chinese, that China is both an ancient civilization, as well as a modern space nation, capable of achieving equally impressive feats as Westerners in space. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea, and India have not launched space stations of their own into orbit.
    1
  26382.  @companyheroes8120  Now you suddenly change your mind that learning from history is stupid like you claimed earlier? In next couple of years, Trump's tariffs won't last forever you know, and President Trump will eventually have to step down as president once his term limit has been reached. The next US president might just start reversing Trump's policies and lift the trade war, thus possibly resulting in a future economic boom for China, as US-China trade relations resume their previous pre-tradewar levels. Who knows?
    1
  26383.  @deschan2246  China has long history of astronomy, and Chinese astronomers have been observing the Heavens since Shang Dynasty. Chinese astronomers were the first to record a supernova, in the Astrological Annals of the Houhanshu in 185 AD, and the supernova that created the Crab Nebula in 1054 is an example of a "guest star" observed by Chinese astronomers, although it was not recorded by their European contemporaries. The world's first star catalogue was made by Gan De, a Chinese astronomer, in the 4th century BC and the armillary sphere (渾儀) was invented in China back in the 1st century BCE to help Chinese astronomers observe the heavens.
    1
  26384.  @deschan2246  In 2016, China completed world's largest radio telescope, the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) also known as Tianyan (天眼) 'Eye of the Heavens'. The 1,650-foot-wide dish was built in China's Guizhou Province and will help scientists learn more about the universe's early days, detect low-frequency gravitational waves and hunt for signals that may have been produced by distant alien civilizations. Source: China Finishes Building World's Largest Radio Telescope space.com/33357-china-largest-radio-telescope-alien-life.html The larger the radio dish, the more sensitive it is to picking up signals from space and FAST's potential to discover an alien civilization will be 5 to 10 times that of current equipment, as it can see farther and darker planets. Since its trial operations began in 2016, China's radio telescope has discovered 44 new pulsars, which are a type of solar phenomena in which a rapidly rotating star emits radiation periodically (like some sort of "cosmic lighthouse" if you will) Video: 44 pulsars identified by China's FAST telescope youtube.com/watch?v=t9nySMjiUzw
    1
  26385.  @deschan2246  In 2013, China landed our very own lunar spacecraft and lunar rover (Chang'e 3 嫦娥-3 and Yutu 玉兔 "Jade Rabbit") on the Moon, making China the world's 3rd nation to make a soft-landing on Earth's celestial neighbor. Source: China Lands On The Moon space.com/23968-china-moon-rover-historic-lunar-landing.html In October 2015, the Jade Rabbit set the record for the longest operational period for a rover on the Moon. The rover's ground penetrating radar found evidence of at least 9 distinct rock layers. Video: China moon landing video: 'Jade Rabbit' rover soft-lands on lunar surface youtube.com/watch?v=XpAwmVPT758
    1
  26386.  @companyheroes8120  Trump's tariffs are extremely unpopular among American businesses, since contrary to what Trump says, it's not China that pays for the tariffs, its the American firms that pay for it, and this will trickle down to affect the consumers (Americans themselves). Didn't I say this before already? As for the US-China trade deficit, it exists because U.S. exports to China were only $120 billion while imports from China were $540 billion. So it was due to Americans consuming too much Chinese products, so why blame China when it is Americans who love low-cost Chinese products? Source: _US Trade Deficit With China and Why It's So High _ thebalance.com/u-s-china-trade-deficit-causes-effects-and-solutions-3306277 It’s unlikely that the trade deficit will change. Most Americans would rather pay as little as possible for computers, electronics, and clothing, even if it means other Americans lose their jobs. So why blame China when Americans are the ones consuming more than they produce to China?
    1
  26387.  @deschan2246  China has even launched a rocket from a floating platform in the Yellow Sea. Video: China's first satellite launch from floating sea platform sees it rocket ahead in space race youtube.com/watch?v=AOEJeHJj7kI The Long March 11WEY vehicle carried seven satellites into space, making China is world's 3rd country after the US and Russia to use a floating launch platform, but the first to fully own and operate such technology for space missions.
    1
  26388. Even the United States acknowledges that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26389.  @dzheyd9609  "Shenzhou. then why million people protest in Hong Kong?" It all started because of an extradition bill. A Hong Konger (named Chan) flew to Taiwan with his pregnant girlfriend (named Poon) and then proceeded to strangle her to death before flying back to Hong Kong alone and leaving her body for the Taiwan authorities to discover. He has since confessed to his crime, and the Taiwan authorities wanted Hong Kong to extradite him to Taiwan to face justice, but Hong Kong realized that there was no proper procedure to do so. Since the crime occurred in Taiwan, Hong Kong's own courts were unable to prosecute him for crimes committed outside of Hong Kong. That's why HK's Chief Executive Carrie Lam proposed an extradition bill to cover up this legal loophole. But then people started protesting and rioting against this extradition bill without first reading its contents, and now that the bill has been scrapped, the HK murderer can walk away, and there's no justice for the victim's family.
    1
  26390.  @Mr2ee  The difference is that US not only slap sanctions on countries they don't like, they also persuade other countries (like USA persuading S. Korea to ban Huawei) to do the same thing as USA. Whereas what China does is only internal and applies to China only. I mean, China don't go around telling other countries to boycott Korean goods or anything isn't it? Why do you lump them in the same category then?
    1
  26391.  @Mr2ee  All China did was boycott South Korean goods in our country that's all. How is that bullying? China still allows USA, Japan, and the rest of the world to trade with South Korea, so why is that considered bullying then? You think South Korea don't bully other countries too? South Korea is even planning to ban Apple iPhone too isn't it?
    1
  26392. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  26393. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  26394. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  26395. 轮子不许说中国的坏话。
    1
  26396. Countries all over the world recognize the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26397. 觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  26398. Japan is still the U.S's lap dog.
    1
  26399. @AsianJayWalker Things had gotten so bad that even Vancouver in Canada was crowned the "Asian-Hate Capital" of the world
    1
  26400. @gaara8217 No, not just tourists. Even Asians born and bred in the West, are receiving the same sort of treatment as if they were foreigners in the lands they grew up with.
    1
  26401. @AsianJayWalker I've made two sentences, which do you claim is a lie?
    1
  26402. During 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but had nothing that Chinese people want in return, so they waged two bloody wars and force China to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. Port cities like Shanghai were forced open to act as drug distribution hubs to pump the addiction throughout rest of China, and Hong Kong was made into British colony.
    1
  26403. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26404. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26405. Taiwan island is an inseparable part of China
    1
  26406. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26407. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26408. From an open-air concentration camp, Gaza has literally morphed into a death camp.
    1
  26409. The world's largest open-air concentration camp has morphed into a death camp.
    1
  26410.  @PeterLamin-bw5rs  Netanyahu even quoted refences to the Amalekites. It's his way of making the Palestinians appear sub-human.
    1
  26411.  @saintgospelrap  I didn't laugh one bit at the jokes by the guy sitting on the chair. It's like his jokes drag on far too long, and there's seemingly no chemistry between him and Trevor Noah.
    1
  26412.  @vipassana123  Studies have shown Asians to be among the world's most intelligent and diligent peoples with long cultures and rich histories. Asians are often stereotyped as being studious, smart, industrious, cunning, good at math, good at engineering, having good head for business, and so on. Stereotypical blue-collar Asian jobs have an element of hardwork, and include railroad worker, laborers (coolies), rickshaw drivers, chefs (of Chinese restaurants), laundromat workers, dry cleaners, nail salons, massage parlours, etc. It seems there is no job too low for Asians to do. If Asians save up money, they stereotypically send their kids to school, to study and not fool around by drinking and partying. When they graduate, they take on white-collar jobs like doctors, lawyers, dentists, engineers, scientists, researchers, programmers, bankers, businessmen, etc. It seems that Asians can aspire to be in any high level jobs as well. Of course, these are just stereotypes and not 100% true. But there must be an element of truth to these stereotypes, for people to make them in the first place.
    1
  26413. The U.S has invested heavily into it's military, and because of this, they've become a hammer that sees everything as a nail.
    1
  26414.  @therealdeal2163  EU had wanted India to get on board in not trading with Russia. The Indian Foreign Affairs minister retorted that India's total purchase of oil from Russia in a month is less than what Europe does in an afternoon.
    1
  26415. Good news for Superman himself.
    1
  26416.  @nickl5658  I also think U.S-born scientists lack the worldly experience that foreign born scientists bring to the U.S.
    1
  26417.  @jonlamontagne  It's actually the U.S that's engaging in such a waste, through initiatives such as the U.S Chips Act
    1
  26418.  @jonlamontagne  You're unable to acknowledge that the U.S wastes financial resources in their attempt to pull other countries down, so you resort to labeling others as bots for their views?
    1
  26419. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26420. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  26421. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26422. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, if you read its constitution.
    1
  26423. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26424.  @HimanshuShukla7987  I found this source from Aljazeera. Source: Chaos and hunger amid India coronavirus lockdown aljazeera.com/news/2020/03/chaos-hunger-india-coronavirus-lockdown-200327094522268.html India's strict lockdown of 1.3 billion people disrupts lives with migrant workers facing hunger and forced to walk home.
    1
  26425.  @HimanshuShukla7987  Here's another source: 42-year-old man starves to death in Jharkhand's Bokaro zeenews.india.com/india/42-year-old-man-starves-to-death-in-jharkhands-bokaro-2268413.html
    1
  26426.  @nitin2779  Why are you deliberately calling it by the wrong name? It's proper name is Covid-19 and even today, scientists aren't exactly sure about the origins of Covid-19. There's a possibility that coronavirus may not have originated in China, it only happens to detected by Chinese government. An Italian Doctor suggested that Covid-19 was present in Italy since November 2019. "Strange pneumonia" cases were already reported in Nov 2019, back in Lombardy, the northern part of Italy. This was months before China had an outbreak with the virus starting on Dec. China might just be where the first case of Coronavirus was detected, but it is not the main place wherein the virus originated. This is what a leading doctor in Italy confessed in a report saying that there's a possibility that COVID-19 did not originate in Wuhan, China but somewhere else-- or maybe in Italy itself. Source: First 'Strange Pneumonia' Case Reported in November 2019 in Italy techtimes.com/articles/248263/20200323/coronavirus-possibly-come-china-italy-first-detected-strange-pneumonia-months-wuhan-outbreak.htm As mentioned by one of the country's leading doctors named Giuseppe Remuzzi, the director of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Milan, he said that there were already few cases in Italy of this unknown virus that has been severe for older people in Nov. up to Dec.
    1
  26427.  Susan Ananda  Indian government shouldn't have let those migrants workers go back to their villages (where the vulnerable elderly folk are) at least gather them into a quarantine zone for 14 days first. Or set up individual quarantine zones in villages for arriving migrants. Bottom Line is to keep the virus away from vulnerable elderly.
    1
  26428.  @jenimarai1906  The novel coronavirus has a proper name given by World Health Organisation and that's Covid-19, so why are you calling it WUHAN virus? Scientists haven't even properly determined where Covid-19 originated from and you're already calling it WUHAN virus? Here, this Japanese source suspects that Covid-19 may have originated from USA. A report from a Japanese TV station that suspected some of the 14,000 Americans died of influenza may have unknowningly contracted the coronavirus has gone viral on Chinese social media, stoking fears and speculations in China that the novel coronavirus may have originated in the US. Source: Japanese TV report sparks speculations in China that COVID-19 may have originated in US en.people.cn/n3/2020/0223/c90000-9661026.html The report, by TV Asahi Corporation of Japan, suggested that the US government may have failed to grasp how rampant the virus have gone on the US soil.
    1
  26429.  @HimanshuShukla7987  Look, I've given you numerous sources, but all you done is dismiss every single source I gave you, then what do you expect me to do?
    1
  26430.  @HimanshuShukla7987  "神州 Shenzhou I just want to not blindfolded follow western media outlet" Which Western media outlet did I quote?
    1
  26431. US only cares about Taiwan as long as they have chips. If Taiwan has nothing, then its support for Taiwan will evaporate. However, even if Taiwan has nothing, mainland China will continue to consider the island as part of its territory and the people of Taiwan as Chinese citizens.
    1
  26432. US is only defending Taiwan for the chips. If Taiwan has nothing, then its support for Taiwan will evaporate. However, even if Taiwan has nothing, mainland China will continue regarding the island as part of China.
    1
  26433. Blinken claims China has crossed Biden's red line on supporting Russia, yet US constantly ignores mainland China's red lines about Taiwan island.
    1
  26434.  @paulodelima5705  Yeah, the population of Uighurs in Xinjiang actually increased over the years. Yet they're calling it a genocide in the media.
    1
  26435.  @paulodelima5705  Yeah, some "genocide" where the population actually increased over the years.
    1
  26436.  @hansihobr  Why are you accusing me of being wumao? Where did I ever mention anything about the Communist Party of China here in this thread?
    1
  26437.  @hansihobr  Why are you accusing me of being a wumao then? I never said anything about communism in this comment thread.
    1
  26438.  @hansihobr  What is your logic here? You don't need to comment anything about communism and you'll be labelled as wumao? I mean, I can accuse you of being wumao without you ever mentioning anything about communism is that it?
    1
  26439.  @hansihobr  Then when did I ever "attack" anyone who speaks bad things of China here? Could you quote me "attacking someone" for saying bad things about China here in this thread? Because you are clearly making up accusations that you yourself can't proof.
    1
  26440.  @hansihobr You can't even provide any quote of me "attacking" anyone on this comment thread, then how can you prove your accusation that I am wumao?
    1
  26441.  @hansihobr  Let me write some pro-CCP comments and see if they are worth the shillings. Although th Chinese Communist Party is not perfect (then again, which government body is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population actually doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled and our poverty rates plummeted. Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm China was once a dirt poor, war torn, illiterate, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past but today, China is world's 2nd largest economy, the manufacturing hub of the world, a rapidly growing scientific nation, protected by world's largest land military, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd largest military expenditure. Video: China - Hell March - the Largest Army in the world youtube.com/watch?v=5Xuqa1xKxOs All achieved under the CCP leadership. So how much is this comment worth?
    1
  26442.  @hansihobr  Here are some more pro-CCP comments: China is home to two of world's fastest supercomputers, the Sunway Taihulight 神威·太湖之光, and Tianhe-2 天河-2 and in the 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source: China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/ Supercomputers play an important role in research, and are used for computationally intensive tasks in various fields, such as quantum mechanics, weather forecasting, climate research, oil and gas exploration, molecular modeling (computing the structures and properties of chemical compounds, biological macromolecules, polymers, and crystals), and physical simulations (such as simulations of the early moments of the universe, airplane and spacecraft aerodynamics, the detonation of nuclear weapons, and nuclear fusion).
    1
  26443. I find it astonishing that even though Cyrus knows that China is unlike what the Western media portrays it to be, yet when it comes Russia, Cyrus believes the Western narrative.
    1
  26444.  @billyehh  During the Vietnam War, the Americans dropped Napalm bombs and torched Vietnamese villages to the ground (remember "Napalm Girl" who had her clothes burnt off?) The Americans also sprayed chemical defoliants like Agent Orange, causing birth defects in Vietnamese kids up till today. The Americans planted numerous mines across Vietnam which cost innocents their lives and limbs.
    1
  26445.  @sjelucten7150  He should watch "Miss Saigon" to see how the Americans pulled out of Saigon and left children they had with Vietnamese women behind.
    1
  26446.  @seymorefact4333  Very creative naming!
    1
  26447.  @s-man5647  "You never explained what it means to have a colonized mind," Colonial mentality is an internalized perception of ethnic and cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization. Such people tend to view the culture of their colonizers as inherently superior to that of others (including their own). This mindset was brought about when the colonizer instills their values into the local people through education systems and media, and even after the colonizer leaves, the people's minds remain "colonized" and loyal to their former masters. It's a form of mental slavery (like Stockholm Syndrome). "It is not simply because Filipinos love America too much. Filipinos minds are not so small that they cannot hold esteem for both America and China." Again, that's why we need to investigate where this inherent love of America comes from. It comes from the fact that Philippines became American colony (after losing the American-Philippine War) and because of that, some Filipinos became American citizens, and therefore, it ensures the continued existence of the colonial mentality, long after Philippine independence. "Thanks to modern trade practices, you only need a small minority of traders to import vast quantities of Chinese goods." The same could be said of those Filipinos that receive US paychecks. Only a small number of the political class receive money from the US, yet somehow they are able to instigate a large proportion of Filipinos to develop positive feelings towards their colonial masters, and negative feelings towards a country that has never colonized Philippines. Only with colonial mentality, can this sentiment be widely adopted by the Filipinos.
    1
  26448.  @s-man5647  "You never explained what it means to have a colonized mind," Colonial mentality is an internalized perception of ethnic and cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization. Such people tend to view the culture of their colonizers as inherently superior to that of others (including their own). This mindset was brought about when the colonizer instills their values into the local people through education systems and media, and even after the colonizer leaves, the people's minds remain "colonized" and loyal to their former masters. It's a form of mental slavery (like Stockholm Syndrome). "It is not simply because Filipinos love America too much. Filipinos minds are not so small that they cannot hold esteem for both America and China." Again, that's why we need to investigate where this inherent love of America comes from. It comes from the fact that Philippines became American colony (after losing the American-Philippine War) and because of that, some Filipinos became American citizens, and therefore, it ensures the continued existence of the colonial mentality, long after Philippine independence.
    1
  26449.  @s-man5647  "It is not simply because Filipinos love America too much. Filipinos minds are not so small that they cannot hold esteem for both America and China." Again, that's why we need to investigate where this inherent love of America comes from. It comes from the fact that Philippines became American colony (after losing the American-Philippine War) and because of that, some Filipinos became American citizens, and therefore, it ensures the continued existence of the colonial mentality, long after Philippine independence. "Thanks to modern trade practices, you only need a small minority of traders to import vast quantities of Chinese goods." The same could be said of those Filipinos that receive US paychecks. Only a small number of the political class receive money from the US, yet somehow they are able to instigate a large proportion of Filipinos to develop positive feelings towards their colonial masters, and negative feelings towards a country that has never colonized Philippines. Only with colonial mentality, can this sentiment be widely adopted by the Filipinos.
    1
  26450.  @s-man5647  No, the point is that even if you somehow managed to get rid of these "contemporary mechanisms," the sentiments of Filipinos towards USA will remain largely unchanged, as long as the colonial mentality remains rooted in their minds. I mean, take Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte for example. Duterte was about as anti-imperialist as about as you can get despite being one of the political elite. Duterte was well-aware of American-Philippine War, and fought to restrict/remove US bases from Philippine territory. Yet Duterte's policies weren't all that well-received by the ordinary Filipinos, who've long considered the US a friend and an ally. It all boils down to the colonial mentality, that's inhibiting any reforms in political thinking towards the US. People are more than just about the contemporary, they are also about history. What's fundamentally needed is a "decolonization of the mind" in order to free the people's minds from their colonial legacy.
    1
  26451.  @s-man5647  I am not missing the point, it's you who've been constantly making up excuses in defense of colonial mentality. Look, let's say even if you somehow manage to remove all those "contemporary mechanisms," the sentiments of Filipinos towards USA will remain largely unchanged, as long as the colonial mentality remains rooted in their minds. Take former President Rodrigo Duterte for example. Duterte was about as anti-American in his policies as you can get, and he was well-versed in Philippine history, including the American-Philippine War and he labored to remove US bases from Philippine territory. Yet Duterte's policies weren't all that well-received by the ordinary Filipinos, who've long considered the US a friend and an ally. It all boils down to the colonial mentality, that's inhibiting any reforms from taking effect among the masses.
    1
  26452.  @s-man5647  Because you seem all to eager to dismiss colonial mentality as "lazy," without considering its widespread influence. Like you claim Filipinos "just happen to have friends and family in the US." Well, it's because Philippines was a former US colony and migration happens, resulting a continuation of the colonial mentality. You keep on claiming "contemporary mechanisms" are the root cause, while failing to take into account the history. People are not just about the contemporary, they are also about the history. As I've said, if the masses already have a preconceived notion of inferiority towards a particular group (i.e colonial mentality) then it becomes all the more easier for the masses to be manipulated into adopting this sentiment.
    1
  26453.  @s-man5647  It's astonishing how on one had, you keep on complaining that I'm lazy. Yet I've put in plenty of effort into defining colonial mentality and its pernicious effects on people living in former colonies. Yet when it comes to your turn to explain your point, you just claim "a YouTube comment thread is inadequate to explain." Makes me wonder who's truly the lazy one here.
    1
  26454.  @s-man5647  For starters, simply talking about the colonial mentality helps bring awareness to the existence of such a phenomena. Many Filipinos have never even heard of colonial mentality. Or if they have, they oftentimes dismiss it simply and assume that they do not have it. To solve a problem, the first thing to do is to recognize that a problem exists, only then can a solution be worked out. Simply dismissing it as "lazy" an example of making light of colonial mentality.
    1
  26455.  @s-man5647  "the expulsion of US bases in the 90s was a great victory...20 years later, those bases are back.. Why? Is it simply because of colonial mentality?" It's precisely because of colonial mentality that those bases are back! Remember the definition of colonial mentality? Colonial mentality is an internalized perception of ethnic and cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization. Such people tend to view the culture of their colonizers as inherently superior to that of others (including their own).
    1
  26456.  @s-man5647  "If China had come in and offered military aid and training to combat the insurgencies..." Take Vietnam for example. During the First Indochina War, China supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons (ranging from artillery guns. to rifles and machine-guns), ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla force with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. From 1950 to 1954 the Chinese government shipped goods, materials, and medicine worth $51 billion (in 2023 dollars) to Vietnam. From 1950 to 1956 the Chinese government shipped 155,000 small arms, 58 million rounds of ammunition, 4,630 artillery pieces, 1,080,000 artillery shells, 840,000 hand grenades, 1,400,000 uniforms, 1,200 vehicles, 14,000 tons of food, and 26,000 tons of fuel to Vietnam. In the Second Indochina War (i.e Vietnam War) and China again supported North Vietnam with military and economic aid, totaled $20 billion ($160 billion adjusted for 2022 prices) during the Vietnam War; included were 5 million tons of food to North Vietnam (equivalent to a year's food production), accounting for 10–15% of their food supply by the 1970s. In the summer of 1962, Mao Zedong agreed to supply Hanoi with 90,000 rifles and guns free of charge. ... Yet fast forward till today, and many Vietnamese have conveniently forgotten the military aid and training offered by China, and many even still hold a positive view of the United States. How to explain this rather ungrateful behavior, if not through colonial mentality? Vietnam was a former French colony after all.
    1
  26457.  @s-man5647  "If China had come in and offered military aid and training to combat the insurgencies" Since you like to pull in other countries for comparison, then take Vietnam for example. During the First Indochina war, China had supplied and provided the Việt Minh guerrilla forces with almost every kind of crucial and important supplies and material required, such as food (including thousands of tonnes of rice), money, medics and medical aid and supplies, arms and weapons (ranging from artillery guns to rifles and machine-guns), ammunition and explosives and other types of military equipment. In addition, 2,000 military advisors from the PRC and the Soviet Union trained the Việt Minh guerrilla force with the aim of turning it into a full-fledged armed force to fight off their French colonial masters and gain national independence. During the Second Indochina War (i.e Vietnam War), China did the same and provided military and economic aid to North Vietnam and the Viet Cong totalling $20 billion ($160 billion adjusted for 2022 prices) during the Vietnam War; included were 5 million tons of food to North Vietnam (equivalent to a year's food production). In 1962, China agreed to supply Hanoi with 90,000 rifles and guns free of charge. Fast forward to today and many Vietnamese have conveniently forgotten Chinese aid and training given to Vietnam, while continuing to view the United States in a positive light, despite the Vietnam War. How to explain this ungrateful if not through the colonial mentality? (Vietnam was a former French colony after all.)
    1
  26458.  @s-man5647  "However, no alternative to the EU common market has been proposed and pursued." Alternatives clearly exists. Haven't you heard of BRICS? But of course this organization is often viewed by the British as inherently inferior to that of the EU, and again it boils down to a type of Stockholm Syndrome (not unlike colonial mentality) and it could even be racially motivated. Till today, many British still see themselves as above Russians, Chinese, Indians and the rest of the BRICS countries.
    1
  26459.  @elanor2123  You said: "Western countries wish China to be governed not by a totalitarian regime." But China's current political system has shown to be extremely successful, especially with regards to handling of Covid-19, compared to Western democracies, then should China abandon our political system (that works for China) and adopt a Western style democracy? Because Westerners say so? Just look at Western democracies producing incompetent leaders with their failed policies/scandals, like Donald Trump's MAGA, Joe Biden's botched Afghan withdrawal, Boris Johnson's "Partygate", Scott Morrison's AUKUS alliance and betraying France in the process. And Western countries want China to be like them, instead of pursuing our own path to success?
    1
  26460. 中国打台湾是内战，所以如果美国插手就变成大战了。
    1
  26461. But how could the Western education system produce such students that lack reasoning and cognitive skills?
    1
  26462.  @stunningandbrave2520  Russian and Chinese diplomats have brokered a rapprochement deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia, isn't this a positive thing for the world?
    1
  26463.  @MarkYeung1  "Why was Lavrov talking about Tucker Carlson in UN?" Because Tucker Carlson was one of the rare newscasters that called for fixing America's internal problems, rather than sending more U.S military aid to Ukraine.
    1
  26464.  @stusanderson3111  Did you know that the 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and a traitor to his people? The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government (Beijing). Declassified CIA files have exposed that a total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) So here we have concrete evidence that the 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the USA to engage in separatist activities against the Central People's Government.
    1
  26465.  @stusanderson3111  Since when? And even if you claim the athletes were censored in China, now that they all gone home, they can tell others about how amazing the Beijing Olympics was. Some of these athletes have been in multiple Olympics around the world, yet they regard this Olympics in Beijing as one of the better ones. Yet why was Aaron Blunck's Twitter account was suspended after he praised the 2022 Beijing Olympics?
    1
  26466.  @stusanderson3111  Again, what genocide? The population of Uighurs in China has actually tripled in size from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. It's apparent that all you do is s**t on China's achievements whenever I bring them up then you're just basically being anti-China that's all.
    1
  26467.  @stusanderson3111  I mean, you didn't even know that the ski ramps were photographed next to cooling towers of a factory, not a nuclear power plant, then it shows that you don't really care about researching into the actual issue, you just want to malign China that's all.
    1
  26468.  @杨杨-j6b  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  26469. Former US president Trump had stated that he was willing to use Meng Wanzhou's arrest as a bargaining chip. And President Biden hasn't uttered a word regarding Meng's arrest, this should already reveal that the USA is not interested in what happens to Meng, yet Trudeu continue to do USA's bidding?
    1
  26470.  @comradetirer  Listen to Scott Ritter's analysis, Kiev was a giant distraction employed by the Russian forces to lock up Ukrainian forces and keep them away from Donbas region, where the majority of the fighting is taking place.
    1
  26471.  @malding8643  "Your perspective goes against what is considered acceptable in almost all western nations, this is going too far." Well China is not a Western nation, and many Chinese have accepted our system. I already elaborated on how it benefits China by keeping rude, inconsiderate Chinese with low social scores within China, by barring them from purchasing plane tickets to fly to other countries and make nuisance of themselves. But its not the end of the world, and there are numerous ways to raise your social score. That is the whole point of a meritocracy after all. If you can't refute my points made over 2 months ago, then why are you claiming I am going too far?
    1
  26472.  @XykuJoxa  How exactly are Chinese people underpaid, overworked, have no freedom? Chinese people are free to travel overseas to other countries for work, study or play (as long as they behave). Haven't you seen the Chinese tourists in your countries, spending money on souvenirs and stimulating your economies? Your local schools and universities are flooded with international exchange students from China, studying the same topics as their peers and competing with them for university courses and job offers when they graduate. Chinese companies like Huawei, Lenovo, Xiamo, Oppo, etc, have become global brands and are hiring foreigners. And Chinese investors are buying up real estate in your countries to develop them. So how exactly do Chinese people lack freedoms? We are virtually everywhere in the world, since we make up 20% of the world's population after all!
    1
  26473. US military presence in Syria is deemed illegal by the Syrian government.
    1
  26474. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  26475. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26476. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26477. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26478. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  26479. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26480. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26481. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26482. The woman probably though it was a Chinese Fire Drill, that's why she asked "How many seats?" (I'm kidding, of course!)
    1
  26483.  @wolfgangdevries127  I've from China.
    1
  26484. @snuffythebloatedbat Which money laundering law or Canadian tech, did Meng Wanzhou break or steal while on Canadian soil?
    1
  26485. The Russians probably managed to covertly recover 300 billion of their frozen foreign reserves, while the EU members were distracted with Ukraine.
    1
  26486. Probably rightfully returned back to the Russians, while the EU were preoccupied with Ukraine.
    1
  26487.  @abbotsful  Because the translation itself is wrong, the name in Chinese is zhōngguó gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) in which zhōngguó 中国 refers to China and gòngchǎndǎng 共产党refers to Communist Party, so the correct translation is Communist Party of China (CPC), NOT the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Just like for example, it is the United States of America NOT the American United States. So it should be CPC, not CCP.
    1
  26488.  @abbotsful  I've already explained how the translation is wrong, it's supposed to be Communist Party of China (CPC) NOT the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Just like it's the United States of America NOT the American United States.
    1
  26489.  @abbotsful  What? Don't you know the meaning of CPC and CCP? Don't you know the meaning of the words "Chinese" and "China"? Just like don't you know the meaning between the words "American" and "America"? How else to explain? The translation is wrong as I have already explained.
    1
  26490.  @abbotsful  Do you call the USA as the United States of America or the American United States? Because there is clearly a difference between the words "America" and "American" how else to explain? Just like there's a difference between the words "China" and "Chinese" how else to explain? The translation is wrong, it should be the Communist Party of China (CPC) NOT the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). I have already sufficiently explained the translation, what more do you want? And you normally use CCP, I've never seen you use CPC before until now
    1
  26491.  @abbotsful  You're correct that: 日本 = Japan, 中国 = China 共产党 = Communist Party So 中国共产党 should be translated as the Communist Party of China (CPC) NOT the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). I already explained this point so many times at the beginning, that the translation is wrong, yet you're claiming that I'm wasting your time with petty rubbish? Even after I explained my argument succinctly? I mean, you don't call it the American United States instead of the United States of America right? So why do you still fail to see the difference? Yet you're accusing me of wasting your time with petty rubbish? As for your comment on Nathan Rich's channel, I can't seem to find your comment at all on that channel to verify what you said. But to answer your question, Nathan Rich's video pointed out how other states are referred to as states, or self-governed, but when it comes to Taiwan, it incorrectly calls Taiwan a country, showing that Wikipedia has taken up a political stance against China that's all. Also you said: "Does China give a s**t about what the UN says about the south china sea?" But what does UN say about the South China Sea? The arbitration court that made ruling on the South China Sea is the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which is not an official UN agency unlike say, the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The PCA only happens to share the same office in Hague as the ICJ, but the two-thirds organisations are different. Source: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1989486/united-nations-stresses-separation-hague-tribunal So since the court ruling is by an unofficial UN-agency, the PCA, then China reserves the right not to adhere to it's ruling.
    1
  26492.  @abbotsful  What is the meaning of the English word "Chinese"? According to Merriam Webster, the word "Chinese" could refer to: -a native or inhabitant of China -a person of Chinese descent -a group of related languages used by the people of China (especially Mandarin) -related to the culture of China (i.e Chinese food, Chinese traditional medicine, etc) However, the word "Chinese" is NOT "China" and since the name is 中国共产党 where 中国 means China and 共产党 means Communist Party so the correct translation should be the Communist Party of China (CPC) NOT the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). How else to make this explanation any clearer? I have already sufficiently explained the argument as to why it should be CPC, not CCP, what more explanation is there to give?
    1
  26493.  @abbotsful  'Of China' you say? Then why do you just call USA as the American United States, instead of United States 'Of America'? Since according you, it's 'Of America'? I have already explained my point succinctly, that the translation is wrong, what more do I need to do explain? It's not a matter of disrespect, because the translation is wrong, like I explained earlier.
    1
  26494.  @abbotsful  I already sufficiently explained the meanings of the words "Chinese" and "China" and that you can't just interchange them, like for United States of America and American United States so what more do I need to explain? The truth is that no one calls USA as American United States because the meaning is wrong, and that's why the translation is wrong, it should be CPC, not CCP, as I have explained in detail.
    1
  26495.  @abbotsful  I have already explained my point succinctly to the best of my knowledge, and here you are quoting someone else's post? Then why did you keep bothering me to explain, when you already have access to sources that explain it better? Granted, my English proficiency sucks, but since you have access to better sources, then why do you keep pestering me?
    1
  26496.  @abbotsful  I did, I said earlier that the translation itself is wrong, the name in Chinese is zhōngguó gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) in which zhōngguó 中国 refers to China and gòngchǎndǎng 共产党refers to Communist Party, so the correct translation is Communist Party of China (CPC), NOT the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Just like for example, it is the United States of America NOT the American United States. So it should be CPC, not CCP. Yet you kept on bothering me even after I explained my point succinctly?
    1
  26497.  @abbotsful  I already explained how the meanings is different, for the words "Chinese" and "China". I even use calling it American United States instead of the United States of America to illustrate the difference in meaning between the words American and America so what's wrong with bringing US into it? Didn't you bring Deutschland 🇩🇪 and 日本 🇯🇵 into the discussion as well?
    1
  26498.  @abbotsful  What is the meaning of the word "Chinese"? According to Merriam Webster, the word "Chinese" could refer to: -a native or inhabitant of China -a person of Chinese descent -a group of related languages used by the people of China (especially Mandarin) -related to the culture of China (i.e Chinese food, Chinese traditional medicine, etc) However, the word "Chinese" is NOT "China" and since the name is 中国共产党 where 中国 means China and 共产党 means Communist Party so the correct translation should be the Communist Party of China (CPC) NOT the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). How else to make this explanation any clearer? As for the Communist Party, the party's ultimate goal is for China to someday in the future, attain the status of a communist society (as described in Marxist orthodoxy). Under President Xi Jinping, China is currently following "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics" where China is in the primary stage of socialism, due to our relatively low level of material wealth and needed to engage in economic growth before pursuing a more egalitarian form of socialism, with communism being the eventual goal. That's why the party keeps the name "Communist Party" to signify that they are still committed to the ideal of a communist society.
    1
  26499.  @abbotsful  Because you keep asking me what's the difference, yet when I meticulously explained the difference meanings for "China" and "Chinese" and how the word "Chinese" is NOT "China". you just claim how's that different. I mean, why does everyone call the United States of America as USA, NOT ASU, the American United States? How else to explain this? You said: "it looked like China had move away from communism and into a form of capitalism." Firstly, China was never communist, neither was the former Soviet Union for that matter. In fact, historically there has never been a communist country on Earth, because a communist society is (roughly) defined as a stateless, cashless, classless society. So China did not move away from communism, we weren't even communist in the first place, but communism is the eventual goal of the Communist Party of China. China is currently in a transitional state, which is called socialism (with Chinese characteristics). As the theory stipulates, China's material wealth is lacking, so distributing China's wealth equally among our vast population just isn't efficient, so China had to build up our productive forces. This was achieved through the establishment of "markets". Westerners have been equating markets with capitalism, but China's socialist market is subordinate to the socialist system (unlike capitalism controlling markets) and dominated by public ownership with the promotion of the goal of common prosperity. If you want to read, there's a book entitled "Marxism and Socialism with Chinese Characteristics" by Jin Huiming. Here's a video of American socialist explaining Socialism with Chinese Characteristics in 30 minutes. Video: American EXPLAINS Socialism with Chinese Characteristics in 30 Minutes | The Comrade Report youtu.be/ZLDV9A4JNJg
    1
  26500.  @abbotsful  About Communism vs Capitalism, it's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No.
    1
  26501.  @MeiinUK  The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) isn't even an official UN agency it just shares the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that's all, but the two parties are unrelated. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) wishes to draw the attention of the media and the public to the fact that the Award in the South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of the Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China) was issued by an Arbitral Tribunal acting with the secretarial assistance of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA). The relevant information can be found on the PCA’s website (www.pca-cpa.org). The ICJ, which is a totally distinct institution, has had no involvement in the above mentioned case and, for that reason, there is no information about it on the ICJ’s website. Source: web.archive.org/web/20160714151430/http://www.icj-cij.org/homepage/index.php?lang=en So since the ruling was made by a non-official UN agency like PCA (instead of ICJ) then China reserves the right NOT TO ADHERE to it's ruling.
    1
  26502.  @MeiinUK  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w
    1
  26503.  @MeiinUK  Why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist Kuomintang had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists. Yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, heavily outnumbered, ill-equipped, starving Communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan? This demonstrates KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland.
    1
  26504.  @MeiinUK  Scapegoating? You're the one literally pointing fingers at China and scapegoating our country, victimising yourself, yet you're accusing me of scapegoating? Wuhan was lockdown when the coronavirus broke out. The Chinese government even rushed to built a brand new 1,000-bed hospital (Huoshenshan 火神山) in Wuhan in 10 days as promised. Video: Huoshenshan: the hospital built in 10 days in China over coronavirus outbreak youtu.be/l2QfufpwfdY China also built a second 1,600-bed hospital (Leishenshan 雷神山) in Wuhan in 12 days. Video: Time-lapse video shows how Leishenshan hospital completed in 12 days youtu.be/bEVkVdlNaxk Now that China has recovered from the coronavirus, the government lift the lockdown in Wuhan and life in China is pretty much back to normal, with contingencies in place. The reason why China is able to effectively control the coronavirus situation (where many Western countries are failing badly) is thanks to the collective efforts of the government and the people. The Covid-19 pandemic is like a global test that everyone has to take. China studied extremely hard for the exam and passed with flying colours and we are now celebrating our graduation ceremony. Whereas Western countries had extra time to prepare, yet they choose to do nothing. Instead, Westerners laughed at China's answers to the problems, yet now they are claiming China cheated, and now they are blatantly copying China's homework after having labelled them as "draconian" initially. Video: Once upon a virus... youtu.be/Q5BZ09iNdvo
    1
  26505.  @MeiinUK  The Permanent Court of Arbitration is NOT an official UN agency (as stated in your source) it merely shares the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice (a well-known UN agency). Since the ruling was made by a non-official UN agency, then China reserves the right not to adhere to it's ruling. The PCA only works if both parties are willing to settle the dispute through 3rd part arbitration but on 19 February 2013, China declared that it would not participate in the arbitration, so since not all parties are willing, why did the arbitration continue?
    1
  26506.  @MeiinUK  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA. The test is given every three years to 15-year-olds around the world and measures their knowledge in reading, science and mathematics. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    1
  26507.  @TheDennisgrass  There are ethnic minorities in the Communist Party of China. The CPC has Uighur, Tibetan, Manchu, Mongol, etc communist members, what makes you think the CPC is organized from the controlling dictorial power of Han Chinese? That's why the name Chinese Communist Party is wrong, because it implies that it suits Han Chinese. The correct name should be the Communist Party of China, since it fights for China's interests.
    1
  26508.  @TheDennisgrass  So why doesn't American Dollar have the Native American language written on their currency?
    1
  26509.  @MeiinUK  Language is always evolving, and that includes the Chinese language. You understand a term 100% at this point in time, fast forward a few generations later, the meaning of words change over time, who can said to understand a word 100%? 官语 means "the language of the imperial court" and the officials in the imperial court were called Mandarins and that's why the dialect today is known as Mandarin. The English term comes from the Portuguese mandarim The English term comes from the Portuguese mandarim (spelled in Old Portuguese as mandarin). The Portuguese word was thought by many to be related to mandador ("one who commands") and mandar ("to command"), from Latin mandare. Source: Mandarin _(bureaucrat) wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandarin_(bureaucrat)
    1
  26510.  @TheDennisgrass  Here's a video of Tibetan Middle School where classes are taught in Tibetan. Video: Visiting a Tibetan Middle School 探访西藏当地的一所中学youtu.be/pSWaFsLgEpU
    1
  26511.  @TheDennisgrass  Ethnic minorities in China (Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongols, Manchu, etc) aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. The population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually tripled in size, so what genocide are you talking about? Here's the population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010. Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  26512.  @davidg.3406  You claim the U.S government is afraid of the Americans, yet why is it Joe Biden can send $40 billion in military aid to Ukriane, while neglecting domestic problems like the shortage of infant formula in the USA? Aren't Americans more concerned about inflation, gun control, healthcare, rising fuel costs, than about Ukraine? Yet the U.S government isn't listening to the people?
    1
  26513.  @davidg.3406  Obviously, not every ordinary American is in the defense and aerospace sector, and it's the ordinary Americans suffering from domestic problems like inflation, rising food and fuel costs, healthcare costs, that aren't going to benefit from the $40 billion that the U.S sent to Ukraine. It also begs the question, why not just spend the $40 billion on solving America's domestic problems instead of such a roundabout route through Ukraine (answer: corruption and money laundering). "Do you think we'll let the dollar crashing down without bring this entire planet in the blaze of fire?" Why do you wish for all of humanity to go down in flames if the U.S dollar collapses? The United States only represents some 4% of the world's population, why should the rest of the world go down with the U.S.A?
    1
  26514.  @davidg.3406  You said: "Do you think we'll let the dollar crashing down without bring this entire planet in the blaze of fire?"_ Why do you hope for the entire planet to go down in flames if the U.S dollar collapses? The United States only represents a meager 4% of the world's population, why should the rest of the world go down with the U.S?
    1
  26515.  @davidg.3406  Why do you hope for the entire planet to go down in flames if the U.S dollar collapses? The United States only represents a meager 4% of the world's population, why should the rest of the world go down with the U.S?
    1
  26516.  @davidg.3406  You said: "Do you think we'll let the dollar crashing down without bring this entire planet in the blaze of fire?"_ The United States only represents a meager 4% of the world's population, so why do you hope for the entire planet to go down in flames if the U.S dollar collapses?
    1
  26517.  @Sweetpuffmuffin  U.S has 4 trillion going into welfare, yet why is there inflation, rising food and fuel prices, and a shortage of infant formula? Why not allocate that actual $40 billion to struggling Americans instead of pouring it into Ukraine?
    1
  26518.  @Sweetpuffmuffin  There's actually a simple solution to the rising food and fuel problems problems, simply get the NATO countries (including USA) to lift those sanctions on Russian gas, wheat and fertilizer. Also, Americans are concerned over gun control and rising healthcare costs and student debt, yet the U.S government is hardly doing anything to address those issues. And what's so surprising about mentioning infant formula? The fact is that the U.S is facing a shortage of infant formula right now, what has China's imported baby formula even got to do with this?
    1
  26519. China is fighting against poverty. USA is fighting against poor people themselves.
    1
  26520. The Yellow Peril mindset in the West did not disappear, it merely switched targets from the Japanese to the Chinese it seems.
    1
  26521. Looks like the Yellow Peril mindset is still active in the West, merely switching from the Japanese to the Chinese
    1
  26522. The Yellow Terror mindset in the West hasn't disappeared, it changed from Japanese to Chinese.
    1
  26523. The Americans made use of Chinese inventions like the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) of paper, printing, compass and gunpowder, yet they think Chinese incapable of innovation.
    1
  26524.  @sergpie  Yet no books? Even before Chinese invent paper, Chinese were already reading books written on scripts of bamboo. For example, the famous The Art of War 《孙子兵法》 by Sun Zi was written since the Spring and Autumn Period (dating to roughly 500 BC). As for "globe-spanning empire", it just wasn't in Chinese blood to found overseas colonies.
    1
  26525. Sanctions on North Korea only increase the suffering of N. Korean citizens, instead of the government, so why continue to pursue such course of actions?
    1
  26526. Toma Hawk So you want continue punishing the N. Korean citizens instead of the government by imposing sanctions? This whole thing leads back to my original comment that the N.K government is not the one feeling the "burn" of those sanctions. So why continue doing the same thing over and over again? Why not try different approach instead?
    1
  26527. Toma Hawk How about blaming the shooter instead? Why is he shooting in the first place? N. Korea is no threat to USA, and its missiles are currently incapable of hitting the US mainland, so why act like USA is in danger? Everyone knows that N. Korea will be annihilated if it ever does launch an actual attack on USA, even Kim himself knows this.
    1
  26528. Why are you people resorting to abusing racial slurs against Chinese people now?
    1
  26529.  @brexitgreens  But these are small personal events that happened to you, not an actual judgement of a country's government. Are those hackers from the Russian government itself, or just from Russia? And while it's bad that some Russians stole your laptop, does that mean that the Russian government is bad? If instead had it been a Chinese that stole your laptop (or perhaps disguised as Americans and posted anti-Russian propaganda on American forums) then are you no longer going to be pro-China because of what those people did to you personally? It almost appears that these "personal signals impossible to manipulate" are just seemingly your own personal prejudices against Russians that's all.
    1
  26530.  @ziggyzugg  Russia Gate is a hoax. The Hillary Clinton campaign hired a bunch of shady operatives to put together a collection of lies and innuendo about Donald Trump and shop it to the FBI. But the FBI never found the least confirmation of any of it. Neither did special counsel Bob Mueller’s vast team. The bureau interviewed Danchenko just days after Trump’s inauguration and learned how utterly baseless the gossip truly was.
    1
  26531.  @ziggyzugg  Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation did not find sufficient evidence that President Donald Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the United States’ 2016 election and did not take a clear position on whether Trump obstructed justice.
    1
  26532.  @ziggyzugg  "Regarding the money Putin has squirrelled away £600 billion for himself.. Neither of these things are justifiable" That means you're also against Ukrainian President Zelenskyy squirreling away some $1.2 billion in offshore accounts according to the Pandora Papers?
    1
  26533.  @ziggyzugg  Aaron Mate from The Greyzone has already debunked Russiagate as a hoax, cooked up by the Democrats to malign the Trump administration. The Democrats have beef with the Russians, look at the 2014 coup of Ukrainian President Yanukovych occurring during Obama's administration, the Russian liberation of Crimea, and now that the Democrats are in power again, there's this Ukrainian crisis. It's almost as if Russiagate was a prelude, meant to spur more Americans to fear Russians, and which has since culminated in the events happening in Ukraine today.
    1
  26534.  @ziggyzugg  You said: "200,000 Poles which Russia has never acknowledged" Because those Poles were killed in Western Ukraine at the hands of Ukrainian Nazi organizations such as Ukrainian Insurgent Army and the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists. These fascist organizations have largely gone unpunished and have revived in Ukraine and these are precisely the organizations that are carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Donbas region. You said: "how many Chechens? how many Georgians ?" So you don't have the actual figures yourself? Then what is there to discuss? You said: "14,000 killed over the past eight years in Ukraine in total..not just Russian s but Ukrainian s defending their country ." Ukrainians defending their country from...other Ukrainians? They could have signed the Minsk Agreements to stop the fighting in Donbas and reach a ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line and instituting constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas. But the Minsk Agreement was not honored, because the fascist elements in Ukrainian national guard threatened Zelenskyy if he tried to make peace in the region. Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that was set in motion 8 years ago, since the 2014 coup d'etat of Ukrainian President Yanukovych at the hand of the USA, and installing their own U.S puppet governments in Ukraine.
    1
  26535.  @ziggyzugg  "i am seeing not seeing Ukrainians calling for surrender.I am seeing a old people who are scared and have nothing left" The Ukrainians can't surrender because their leader Zelenskyy wants to use Ukrainians as a human meat shield. There's literally no other course of action for Ukraine, except for surrender. NATO and USA has made it clear that for all their talk, they aren't going to put NATO boots on the ground to defend Ukraine, neither are they going to impose a no-fly-zone over Ukraine. Ukraine's admission into NATO is highly unlikely at this moment, because it would mean NATO is obliged to send troops to defend Ukraine if it were a member, and I just can't see that happening. But by refusing to surrender, Zelenskyy is only prolonging the inevitable and costing more Ukrainian lives. By releasing prisoners and arming civilians with rifles, Zelenskyy is sowing chaos and attempting to maximise civilian casualties. By removing the age limits for conscription, Zelenskyy is effectively enlisting child soldiers to fight and die for his refusal to surrender.
    1
  26536.  @ziggyzugg  The ex-wife has been abusing her two children Donetsk and Luhansk for 8 years. According to UN statistics, over 13,000 people died in those two republics over the course of 8 years, why should Russia let Ukraine continue to kill thousands more? Russia is not starting a war, they are ending one that was set in motion since the 2014 coup ousting President Yanukoyvch by the USA and installing their own U.S puppet government in Ukraine.
    1
  26537.  @ziggyzugg  So you're also against the U.S wars such as Iraq War, Afghan War, Syrian War, Libyan War, Yemen War, etc? Anyone can see that USA is a warmonger and represents a threat to global peace and stability. USA has been at war for 225 out of 243 years since 1776.
    1
  26538.  @ziggyzugg  Earlier you just blurt out Putin squirreling away money in offshore accounts, so does that mean you're also against Zelenskyy's $1.2 in offshore accounts? Have you seen the corruption that plagues Ukraine's government?
    1
  26539.  Karen Xitler  Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. Yet Western media just demonised Mao as mass murderer when the intention to murder is clearly absent
    1
  26540.  @ziggyzugg  That's for the Russian government to decide, isn't it? And so does this mean that you are against Ukrainian President Zelenskyy squirreling away $1.2 billion in off-shore accounts, as revealed in the Pandora papers?
    1
  26541.  @brexitgreens  You accused me of hijacking JaYoe Nation's thread, but I only made 1 post to JaYoe Nation, the rest are literally me responding to accusations that's all. You yourself posted numerous comments too but choose to delete them, yet accuse me of spamming? If memory serves, your deleted comments were extremely anti-Russian in nature. Today, Russians are facing discrimination in the West if they refuse to denounce their motherland. Russian athletes are getting banned from the Olympics. Russian sportsmen are forbidden from participating in competitions if they refuse to condemn Putin. Russian musicians, conductors, composers, dancers and other artists are facing discrimination if they refuse to condemn their motherland, is this the sort of Russophobic behaviour that you condone?
    1
  26542.  @MarkYeung1  The root source of the conflict is clearly Kiev. The Ukrainian government has been supporting ultra-nationalist, neo Nazis like the Azov Battalion that's been carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Luhansk. Over the course of 8 years, over 13,000 people have been killed in Donbas region by shelling on both sides, so Moscow needs to get Kiev to agree to demilitarize and de-nazify Ukraine. It's the same reason as why Britain and France attacked Germany. Even though Germany attacked Poland, the fighting was not limited to Poland, the Allies took the fighting to Germany, the same as why Moscow took the fighting to Kiev. Because that's the root of the problem.
    1
  26543. @mark yeung The root source of the conflict is clearly Kiev. The Ukrainian government has been supporting ultra-nationalist, neo Nazis like the Azov Battalion that's been carrying out genocide of ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Luhansk. Over the course of 8 years, over 13,000 people have been killed in Donbas region by shelling on both sides, so Moscow needs to get Kiev to agree to demilitarize and de-nazify Ukraine. It's the same reason as why Britain and France attacked Germany. Even though Germany attacked Poland, the fighting was not limited to Poland, the Allies took the fighting to Germany, the same as why Moscow took the fighting to Kiev. Because that's the root of the problem.
    1
  26544.  @martinlaoshi  Let's take look then at examples rooted in reality. No more KFC-Burger King analogies or Option A, B, C examples. Only things that happen in the real world. China had abstained from the UN vote, but China might as well be treated as having voted in support of Russia, if its all the same to USA. The meetings between Jake Sullivan and Yang Jiechi, and the Biden-Xi meeting help illustrate this point. Anthony Blinken's recent announcements of fresh U.S sanctions on Chinese officials help further cement this point. Like China, India also abstained and Biden remarked that that decision by India is "shaky" and that India is possibly going to face the same treatment by USA towards China. This helps solidify the point that abstaining is basically the same as having voted in support of Russia, the two are being grouped together. And there we have it. My examples make use of what's happening in reality, not made-up analogies like KFC-Burger King or your Option A, B, C example. Yet you've repeatedly accused me of living in a "little fantasy world", when I've been explaining my point all along with real-world examples, not analogies unlike you.
    1
  26545.  @racismissexy4202  Nice to hear from you in Arunachal Pradesh. While I understand Indian media has been negative towards China, I thought India has good relations with Russia and will at least be neutral towards Russia. I also agree that it's good to hear both side rather than focus on one side.
    1
  26546.  @nemaiemoskalia  Russia's involvement in South Ossetia and Abkhazia, was because Georgia attacked first. In early August 2008, Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili sent troops into the rebellious province of South Ossetia, and Russia came to its defense. Chechnya had been infiltrated by Islamist fighters declaring it an independent state and calling for holy war. Had this happen in any country, it would be classified as terrorism and separatist and that's how Russia reacted as any country should when there are radical separatist movements in their territory. Today, Chechen fighters are fighting on the side of Russia. Crimea's referendum had the majority (96%) voting to join the Russian Federation, because of the 2014 coup d'etat ousting Yanukoyvch by the USA through leaked audio recordings by Victoria Nuland, and installing their own U.S puppet government in Kiev, and Crimea wanted no part of this new government. We know USA is behind this, because the candidate Nuland picked turned out to be the one that became the next Ukrainian President. "Moreover throughout those 8 years Ukraine and other countries suggested introducing UN peacekeepers to Donbass, but Russia didn't often sabotaged it, though now claims that nobody cared for this problem. " UN peacekeepers would have make the situation even worst, because it would be an excuse to send NATO troops into Donbas, so how would that helped? The Minsk agreements were meant to stop the fighting, include a ceasefire, facilitate withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, and institute constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas, which was what Russia supported. But the Minsk agreement wasn't honored. "After this, protests became absolutely massive and he cowardly fled, knowing that his crimes would be investigated (and they were), leaving his huge mansion that became a museum of corruption." Ukraine has a history of corruption (that's why NATO countries are relunctant to admit Ukraine into NATO). Even today Zelenskyy has some $1.2 billion tucked away in off-shore accounts. However, that doesn't change the fact the Yanukoyvch was democratically elected President of Ukraine that was ousted in a coup supported by the United States. "The fact that communists smartly tided up all the republics producing different goods (kinda creating their own supply chain) and had impressive reconstruction doesn't really justify it's totalitarianism that killed millions of its own citizens" Thus far, you failed to list how Russia killed millions of Ukrainian citizens while it was part of the Soviet Union. And you're just going to ignore all that Soviet industrialization of Ukraine while it was part of the USSR? Take the automotive industry for example, the automotive industry in Ukraine was established during the Soviet times and until fall of the Soviet Union was an integral part of automotive industry of the Soviet Union. The first Ukraine-based motor vehicles brands were established in the late 1950s. Ukraine was the only Soviet republic other than Russia manufacturing various types of automobiles and automotive parts with a former annual output of more than 200 thousands units. Whereas today, instead of producing its own cars, Ukraine is importing Western cars because they've lost all their industrialization they gained while as part of the Soviet Union. "Economy in no way can justify that Russia lauches over thousand missiles on it's neighbor, kills thousand of civils and declares that most of Ukrainans turn out to be Nazis, because they fight against invaders." You're trying to conflate Ukraine's industrialization under the Soviet Union with the conflict that's happening now. Ukraine does have Nazis in their National Guard like the Azov Battalion. Even NATO took pictures of the Ukrainian Military and posted pics on Twitter, but after some users pointed out the Ukrainian soldiers wearing Nazi symbols on their insignia, they had to take those pics down. There are many YouTube videos detailing the Nazi movement in Ukraine so it's not as though this appeared suddenly overnight. I suggest you watch Oliver Stone's 2016 documentary entitled Ukraine on Fire to learn more about how the seeds of Nazism were planted in Ukraine and allowed to germinate and spread. "Also it's not like Russia has less corruption" What has Russia's corruption got to do with the fact that Ukraine has corruption? It just shows Ukraine was rejected from joining NATO because of Ukraine government corruption.
    1
  26547.  @FancyPantsOnFire  Many others have found that the analogy puts the Russo-Ukraine conflict in perspective.
    1
  26548.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  Indians simply love Chinese products, especially smartphones. Here are the Top 5 Smartphone brands in India: 1. Xiaomi (Chinese) 2. Samsung (South Korean) 3. Vivo/Oppo (Both Chinese) 4. Apple (American) 5. OnePlus (Chinese) ... Source: Top 5 Smartphone Brands in India electronicsb2b.com/headlines/the-top-five-smartphone-brands-in-india/ Video: Xiaomi Success Secret | How it became the Number 1 smartphone brand of India youtu.be/r21pzXPmYOw
    1
  26549.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  China is home to many of the world's largest banks including ICBC, China Construction Bank, AgBank, Bank of China, Bank of Communications, Postal Savings Bank of China, China Merchants Bank, Industrial Bank (China), Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, China CITIC Bank, China Minsheng Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Hua Xia Bank, Bank of Beijing, and so on. Source: List of largest banks wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_banks But where are all the famous Indian banks?
    1
  26550.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  Even in Internet companies, China has produced companies like Alibaba, Tencent, JD, Baidu, BtyeDance Meituan-Dianping, NetEase, and so on. Source: List of largest Internet companies wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies#List But where are all the famous Indian internet companies?
    1
  26551.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    1
  26552.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  China has established a strong hold over the Indian smartphone market. Four of the five highest-selling smartphone brands in India during April-June this year were from the mainland, according to data from Hong Kong-based market research firm Counterpoint Research. South Korea’s Samsung was the only non-Chinese brand in the top five by market share. Source: Four of the top five smartphone brands sold in India are Chinese qz.com/india/1675443/xiaomi-oppo-vivo-realme-indias-favourite-smartphone-brands/ The China-based BBK group, the parent company of OPPO, Vivo, Realme, and OnePlus, became the country’s leading smartphone seller for the first time, capturing a combined 30% share.
    1
  26553.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  China has established a strong hold over the Indian smartphone market. Four of the five highest-selling smartphone brands in India during April-June this year were from the mainland, according to data from Hong Kong-based market research firm Counterpoint Research. South Korea’s Samsung was the only non-Chinese brand in the top five by market share. Four of the top five smartphone brands sold in India are Chinese Source: qz(dot)com/india/1675443/xiaomi-oppo-vivo-realme-indias-favourite-smartphone-brands/ The China-based BBK group, the parent company of OPPO, Vivo, Realme, and OnePlus, became the country’s leading smartphone seller for the first time, capturing a combined 30% share.
    1
  26554.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  Diwali, the festival of lights, has just seen a sharp rise in sales of Chinese goods in India. From the festival-related Chinese products flooding Delhi's wholesale market to the 30 to 40 percent increase in Xiaomi's festival sales, there are signs everywhere indicating that Indians rely heavily on "Made in China." Source: Diwali sales prove Chinese products are a mainstay in the Indian market globaltimes.cn/content/1168282.shtml Indeed, not only have Indian consumers long been dependent on Chinese-manufactured goods, but Indian industrial development is also supported by Chinese products. China supplies roughly 90 percent of India's solar panels, and the country's telecoms industry only saw rapid growth when Chinese smartphones began to be assembled there.
    1
  26555.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  Out of the top five smartphone sellers in India, four — Xiaomi, Vivo, Oppo and Realme — are Chinese. Source: Chinese  smartphone makers ringing in more investments into India livemint.com/technology/tech-news/chinese-smartphone-makers-ringing-in-more-investments-into-india/amp-1567016973892.html Xiaomi unseated Samsung Electronics from top spot in India’s smartphone market last year on the back of successful online promotions to consumers, giving the Chinese company 29 per cent of the total market, according to a recent report by IDC. Source: Chinese smartphone brands strengthen their grip on India, with Xiaomi displacing Samsung from top spot scmp.com/tech/start-ups/article/2185785/chinese-smartphone-brands-strengthen-their-grip-india-xiaomi South Korean brand Samsung, which was No 1 in India in 2017, fell to second spot last year with 22 per cent market share. Xiaomi’s total smartphone shipments in India reached 41.1 million last year, representing 59 per cent year-on-year growth.
    1
  26556.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  Chinese tech company Xiaomi has come to dominate India's massive low-cost smartphone market in a few short years. Source: Xiaomi: The Chinese brand dominating India's smartphone market bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-50135050 Fifteen minutes - that's how long it took for Xiaomi's latest smartphone, Redmi Note 8, to sell out once it went on a "flash sale" online on Monday.
    1
  26557.  @चूतपाकिस्तान  Check out Huawei P30 Pro camera zoom. Not 5x or 10x or 20x but a whopping 50x zoom on the beautiful full Moon in the following video: Video: Moon zoom shot on the Huawei P30 Pro with no accessories youtu.be/YayhC2f76q8
    1
  26558. @Perla Lopez Gomez 2049 hasn't even arrived, yet you're already confirming India and China will start WWIII? You can foresee the future is that it? L
    1
  26559. @Perla Lopez Gomez Mulan actress Liu Yifei, even supported the Hong Kong police during the Hong Kong riots.
    1
  26560. @Perla Lopez Gomez So if India builds Apple iPhone then Apple will become popular? But are Indian workers willing to work for the same low price as Chinese workers?
    1
  26561. @Perla Lopez Gomez If Biden wants to help China and Russia, then what's wrong with helping one another? Didn't majority of Americans voted for Joe Biden in the first place? Majority of Americans choose Biden after all.
    1
  26562. @Perla Lopez Gomez China is hated by mostly the West, not the entire world. It's because America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set and many economists firmly believe that China's economy will surpass the United State's economy sometime in the foreseeable future.
    1
  26563.  @TacticalMayo  So you're saying that he said the NAFTA area is self sufficient in energy, food and most industrial components is an absolute complete lie? That NAFTA is in fact not self-sufficient?
    1
  26564. We should not assume that Kim Jong-Un is like his father, Kim Jong-Il, and maybe the talks will bear fruit this time round.
    1
  26565. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26566. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26567. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26568. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  26569. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China..
    1
  26570. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26571. Taiwan's an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26572. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26573. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26574. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  26575. Gordon been predicting China's economy will fail. Similarly, Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. Here is compiled list of what Western journalists have to say about China's economy 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. But China's economy is still going strong even in 2018, despite what these folks been saying for almost 30 years.
    1
  26576.  @rais1953  Why should China do that?
    1
  26577. China is US, UK and Russia's biggest trading partner, so why would these countries want to destroy relations with their biggest trading partner, in order to help India in a war against China?
    1
  26578. +Chiranmoy Bhattacharya You think that USA and UK will help India simply because democracy help democracy. Soviet Union was communist too, yet it helped democratic India so what makes you think ideology alone determines who helps who? China is still USA, UK and Russia's biggest business partner, so isn't their economy more important than ideology alone?
    1
  26579. President Trump said many times in his public address, that "China's cooperation is essential to dealing with the missile crisis on the Korean peninsula" so why would he want to jeopardize US-China relations for India's sake?
    1
  26580. XERNEXX Corruption is universal phenomenon faced by many governments, and Indian government too is not exempted from corruption. But at least the communist party is doing something about it, such as those anti corruption crackdowns to root out corruption. Although I don't know if Indian government is doing anything about its corruption issues.
    1
  26581.  @sethaldrich6902  Do you have evidence to support your claim that China gives more under the table?
    1
  26582.  @sethaldrich6902  So "truth caller" you said China gives more under the table to WADA than the US, but do you have proof of this?
    1
  26583. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. But its already 2019 and China's economy is still going strong, so haven't Western economist been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    1
  26584. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26585. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26586. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  26587. If you read its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26588. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China if you read its constitution.
    1
  26589. Taiwan island is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26590. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.........
    1
  26591. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, according to its constitution.
    1
  26592.  @fireturkeyfly11  You said: "China does not keep the promise and militarise South China Sea, forcecibly take over most of the islands" China has twelve islands while Vietnam occupies twenty-one islands on which it has built runways, piers, barracks, storage tanks, and gun emplacements. Malaysia and the Philippines, have five and nine sites respectively, occupied by naval detachments. Yet the West close one eye towards Vietnam occupying most of the islands and militarizing them, while blaming China for militarization?
    1
  26593.  @fireturkeyfly11  You said: "for years, countries around lay claim to those island but dare not to become too loud, because of threats from China. This is before any military base was built." Vietnam began construction of its airstrip on _Spratly Island in 1976, making this the first runway in the Spratly island group. In 1978, the Philippines incorporated Thitu Island after airstrip construction had already begun. In 1983, Malaysia built a resort and airstrip atop Swallow Reef. The Nationalist Chinese government occupied Itu Aba in 1946, but did not begin constructing its airstrip until 2006, and construction finished in 2008. China is the most recent Spratly claimant to build an airstrip, which it began on Fiery Cross Reef in late 2014 after it reclaimed the former low-lying feature._ ... Source: Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative: Airpower in the South China Sea (China is actually a latecomer to building bases in the South China Sea, and South East Asian countries have been building bases in SCS long before China.)
    1
  26594.  @fireturkeyfly11  "For years, those countries that lay claim on the island built a small scale military base," So you admit that those countries/regions were militarizing the South China Sea Islands earlier than China? Then why is it that the U.S did not go after those other countries, instead it goes after China? Also, China does not occupy the majority of South China Sea Islands, we only have 12, compared to Vietnam occupying 21 islands, yet you're painting China as the bully here? You said: "At most is to fend off pirates." Likewise, China is fending off pirates in the South China Sea by building bases there, how is this different from other claimants to the SCS? You said: "When the big bully China comes it, it kicks out those small fries, especially Philippine." The Philippines ran aground a ship (BRP Sierra Madre) onto a South China Sea Island claimed by China, in order to stake Manila's claim to those territory. China offered to help repair the ship to send it on its way, but the Philippines refused, because they want to claim the island for themselves. Yet you're painting China as the bully here? You said: "At the end, China states clearly CCP will not militarise the region." China only made the promise to Obama Adminstration if they would stop sending warships to the SCS. But the U.S did not honor their promise, so China is no longer under obligation to honor ours.
    1
  26595.  @fireturkeyfly11  In 1947, China published the claim to the South China Sea Islands and back then, nobody objected to China's claim, not even Vietnam. In 1958, the North Vietnam PM Pham van Dong had formally acknowledged that the Spratly and Paracel Islands were historically Chinese, in a diplomatic note he wrote to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. The diplomatic note was written on September 14 and was publicized on Nhan Dan newspaper(Vietnam) on September 22, 1958. In 1958, the People's Republic of China issued a declaration defining its territorial waters which encompassed the Spratly and Paracel Islands. North Vietnam's prime minister, Pham Van Dong, sent a diplomatic note to Zhou Enlai, stating that "The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision." ... Source: Wikipedia:File:1958 diplomatic note from phamvandong to zhouenlai Yet when it was later discovered that the region contained rich reserves of natural resources, Vietnam suddenly changed their mind and started claiming the South China Seas Islands for itself. Vietnam even began construction of its airstrip on Spratly Island in 1976, making this the first runway in the Spratly island group, as well as building barracks and gun emplacements on those islands.
    1
  26596.  Ben Louis  Western media tries to paint China's mobile payment negatively, as the government keeping track of people's transactions and invading privacy.
    1
  26597.  @chrisbell238  "神州 Shenzhou Patents are not innovation neither is research - NAME ONE!" Chinese invented the world's first passenger drone, a drone capable of carrying human cargo, Ehang 184 was unveiled at the Computer Electronics Show (CES) 2016 by Chinese entrepreneurs
    1
  26598.  @chrisbell238  China had lockdown Wuhan after human-to-human transmission was confirmed. Also, according to the Hubei Airport Group Company, no international passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since its lockdown on January 23, apart from chartered flights.
    1
  26599.  @chrisbell238  Except for chartered flights, no international passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since its lokdown on January 23, according to the Hubei Airport Group Company on Thursday.
    1
  26600. Japan invaded China during WW2 and committed wartime atrocities such as Rape of Nanjing, Unit 731 and "comfort" women, and even South Koreans protest outside Japanese embassy over comfort women issue. During Rape of Nanjing, Japanese solders butchered unarmed Chinese men for sport and many Chinese women were gang raped. Their bodies were left naked and mutilated, with their private parts bayoneted or having sharp sticks of bamboo shoved in. Young children and the elderly weren't spared, and Japanese soldiers cut open young children's bodies to rape them. Pregnant women had their swollen bellies bayoneted after being raped, and the unborn fetus ripped open from their wombs. What did Chinese people do to deserve this? Chinese people only wanted to defend our homes and protect our loved ones, but the Japanese soldiers stole our territories, killed our men and raped our women.
    1
  26601. Had he been paid by the Chinese government, then Cyrus won't be including so many sponsors in his videos.
    1
  26602.  @MarkYeung1  Because Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British, so China doesn't want to propagate this myth. Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies (By Gregory Clark) ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053 The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
    1
  26603.  @fcl3294  PBS documentary blocked in China? Well, PBS blocked Chinese documentary "China's War on Poverty" (video:youtu.be/nuaJGPZCBYU ) from airing on PBS, because it showed China as "too positive"
    1
  26604.  @kirakamu9246  USA did not liberate China from Japanese rule. Japan clearly refused to surrender even after 2 atomic bombings by the USA and USA didn't even invade Japanese mainland. It was actually thanks to the Soviet invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria that was the last campaign fought of WWII and finally caused Japan to surrender. So if anything, it was thanks to the Communist Party of Soviet Union who finally brought an end to WWII and caused Japan to surrender. Not the US atomic bombings.
    1
  26605.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou South China Sea is not entirely China. That's the ruling of the international Court." What "International Court" ruling? The ruling was made by Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which is not a recognised UN agency it only shares the same office space in the Hague as the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Source: United Nations stresses separation from Hague tribunal scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1989486/united-nations-stresses-separation-hague-tribunal The Permanent Court of Arbitration rents space in the same building as the UN’s International Court of Justice, but the two organisations are not related Since the ruling was made by a non-UN agency, then China reserves the right not to adhere to it's ruling.
    1
  26606.  @kirakamu9246  The US bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki mostly killed Japanese civilians, women, children, the elderly, and men unfit for active military duty. The vast majority of Japanese military strength remained unaffected by the atomic bombings, that's why Japan refused to surrender even after the bombings. It was thanks to the Soviet Union invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria that was the last campaign fought of WWII and finally caused Japan to surrender. Source: Soviet Invasion of Manchuria was the last campaign fought of WWII wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Manchuria So wasn't it the Communists that finally caused Japan to surrender?
    1
  26607.  @kirakamu9246  And today, Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region is clearly part of China, so is Tibet Autonomous Region and Inner Mongolia also part of China. Even Mongolia today is a fraction of it's former glory under the Mongolian Empire, it was Kublai Khan (descendent of Genghis Khan) who abandoned his babaric nomadic ways and adopted Han culture, proclaiming himself Emperor of Yuan 元 Dynasty China.
    1
  26608.  @kirakamu9246  The Jurchens homeland of Manchuria is now part of China. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  26609.  @kirakamu9246  The Uighur population in China actually tripled in size from 3 million to 10 million Uighurs in 2010. The latest official figure for Uighurs is 12.8 million in 2018, so clearly the Uighur population is growing. The population of Tibetans in China have also tripled from 2 million in 1953 to 6 million in 2010. Population of Tibetans in China from 1953 to 2010. 1953: 2,775,622 1964: 2,501,174 1982: 3,821,950 1990: 4,593,072 2000: 5,416,021 2010: 6,282,187 …… Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups
    1
  26610.  @kirakamu9246  In China, the Chinese government controls the state-owned companies for China's benefit, whereas in USA, the U.S corporations control the U.S government for war and profit.
    1
  26611.  @kirakamu9246  All land in China belongs to the state, therefore, it belongs to the people of China. In the West, you can sell your property to foreigners (including Chinese buyers) and your land prices fluctuate uncontrollably or come under the control of foreign powers. Because your government allows it. In China, you can't sell land to foreigners, even Chinese can't selling our lands to foreigners permanently, because all land is property of the people of China and don't deserve to fall into foreign hands. So we avoid the problem that Western countries are facing when Chinese buyers purchase your property. Which system is superior in the long term?
    1
  26612.  @kirakamu9246  The Communist Party of China owns all public utilities like electricity, water and gas, so that the cost of utilities will be affordable to the masses. Look at the example where Texas has that power shortage during Winter conditions, because their electric grid is privatised and disconnected from the main grid. When the private companies control your water, gas and electricity, then they can always hike up the price, making customers pay more money for utilities. The People's Liberation Army is loyal to the Communist Party of China, because otherwise, there might be a military coup like in Thailand where the military seizes control of a country from the government. Then the ordinary people suffer because of miltary coups.
    1
  26613.  @kirakamu9246  Besides the Communist Party of China (CPC) 中国共产党（中共）China has 8 other political parties and they are: -China Zhi Gong Party (CZGP) 中国致公党（致公党） -Chinese Peasants' and Workers' Democratic Party (CPWDP) 中国农工民主党（农工党） -China Democratic League (CDL) 中国民主同盟（民盟） -Jiusan Society (JS) 九三学社 -China National Democratic Construction Association (CNDCA) 中国民主建国会（民建） -China Association for Promoting Democracy (CAPD) 中国民主促进会（民进） -Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League (TDSGL) 台湾民主自治同盟（台盟） -Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang (RCCK) 中国国民党革命委员会（民革）
    1
  26614.  @kirakamu9246  China experiences on average some 500 protests daily over wide variety of grievances, including corruption, forced evictions, unpaid wages, human rights abuses, environmental degradation, ethnic protests, petitioning for religious freedom and civil liberties, protests against one-party rule, as well as nationalist protests against foreign countries. The number of annual protests has grown steadily since the early 1990s, from approximately 8,700 "mass group incidents" in 1993 to over 87,000 in 2005. In 2006, the _Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010._ Source: Protest and dissent in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Protest_and_dissent_in_China That's an average of 493 protests every day in 2010.
    1
  26615.  @kirakamu9246  China has 5000 years of history and obviously it's not going to be all sunshine and rainbows throughout China's long history. The Great Wall of China for example, is the world's largest graveyard where many political dissidents were sent to work, died and buried into it's walls. Yet the Great Wall of China is a tourist attraction, because it's an inalienable part of our history.
    1
  26616.  @kirakamu9246  Qin Shihuang Di, the First Emperor of China, was the man who unified several warring states into Qin Dynasty, the first unified Chinese dynasty (so much that the name China is named after Qin) It was Qin Shihuang who unified the written language (Hanzi 汉字) the Chinese characters used by Chinese today, and he standardised commerce, currencies, weights and numerous economic policies. The Qin Emperor's Tomb and Terracotta Army in Xi'an 西安 is one of the greatest archaeological excavations of our time. It's part of Chinese cultural heritage and remains a popular tourist attraction even today. Video: Terracotta Army, Xian, China in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/VhIouznYlvo The Terracotta Army was created during the reign of the first emperor of China's Qin dynasty (221-207 B.C.), to protect the emperor's tomb. 700,000 people probably worked on the site, near the city of Xian, for almost three decades. More than 8000 figures have been excavated so far. The tomb has been designated a UNESCO World Heritage site.
    1
  26617.  @kirakamu9246  Chairman Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wants to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. If not for Chairman Mao Zedong, China today would be a weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves instead of the strong unified country we are today. It was Mao and the communists who unified China and founded the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949, where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years.
    1
  26618.  @kirakamu9246  Have you visited the Great Wall? China has many historical monuments like The Great Wall of China, Forbidden City, Qin Emperor Tomb, Terracotta Army, The Grand Canal (world's oldest and longest artificial river) and many more historical sites. Here's some videos of Chinese historical monuments. Video: The Great Wall of China in 4k - DJI Phantom 4 youtu.be/EotbKqZmBuY?t=20 Video: Forbidden City, Beijing, China in 4K (Ultra HD) youtu.be/R9vcSWb6mug
    1
  26619.  @kirakamu9246  Speaking of skyscrapers, China is home to many of the world's skyscrapers. Countries or Jurisdictions Ranked by Number of 150m+ Completed Buildings 1. China (2,395) 2. United States (825) 3. United Arab Emirates (268) 4. Japan (261) 5. South Korea (233) 6. Australia (122) 7. Canada (112) 8. Thailand (108) 9. Indonesia (105) 10. Malaysia (97) ... Source: Countries or Jurisdictions Ranked by Number of 150m+ Completed Buildings skyscrapercenter.com/countries
    1
  26620.  @kirakamu9246  Han Chinese is a concept developed after Han Dynasty (202 BC - 220 AD). The Chinese characters standardised by Qin Shihuang was later known as Hanzi 汉子 after the concept of Han wss developed in China.
    1
  26621.  @kirakamu9246  Chinese invented the Four Great Inventions (四大发明) which have greatly influenced the world through their respective areas. Paper and Printing made the transcribing and transmission of knowledge easier. The Compass made navigation easier and dangerous journeys safer and more reliable. And Gunpowder has changed the way modern wars are fought.
    1
  26622.  @kirakamu9246  The Mongols were nomadic tribesmen who lived off the land and simply moved to greener pastures once the grass is exhausted. It was Han farmers who worked hard growing rice, crops and so on to feed people. When times were lean for Mongols, these warriors invaded Han villages to kill farmers and plunder their hard grown food for themselves, razing villages and raping women. What sort of honor is that? To plunder hard grown food, because their culture is nomadic so they don't grow their own food?
    1
  26623.  @kirakamu9246  With Chinese invention of paper, came inventions like paper lanterns, paper umbrellas and paper banknote (which made business transactions easier since merchants need not carry around lots of metal coinage and precious stones) Mankind's first aviation was in the form of paper kite, and even hot air balloons were invented in China, and were known as Sky Lanterns (天灯) or Kongming Lanterns (孔明灯) Here is beautiful video of RISE Lantern Festival in Las Vegas, celebrated with Chinese Sky Lanterns. Video: youtu.be/SNtwlBbBdb4?t=10 (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience)
    1
  26624.  @kirakamu9246  Firearms were invented in China around 1250 AD when the man-portable fire lance (a bamboo or metal tube that could shoot ignited gunpowder) was combined with projectiles such as scrap metal, broken porcelain, or darts/arrows. The oldest firearm in the world is Heilongjiang Handcannon. It was made of bronze, has been dated to 1288 because it was discovered at a site in modern-day Acheng District, Heilongjiang, China. The firearm had a 6.9 inch barrel of a 1-inch diameter, a 2.6 inch chamber for the gunpowder and a socket for the firearm's handle. It is 13.4 inches long and 7.8 pounds without the handle, which would have been made of wood. Source: History of the firearm wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_firearm
    1
  26625.  @kirakamu9246  The handgrenade was invented in China. In China, during the Song Dynasty (960–1279 AD), weapons known as Zhen Tian Lei (震天雷, "Sky-shaking Thunder") were created when Chinese soldiers packed gunpowder into ceramic or metal containers. In 1044, a military book Wujing Zongyao ("Compilation of Military Classics") described various gunpowder recipes in which one can find, according to Joseph Needham, the prototype of the modern hand grenade. The mid-14th-century book Huolongjing (火龍經, "Fire Dragon Manual"), written by Jiao Yu (焦玉), recorded an earlier Song-era cast-iron cannon known as the "flying-cloud thunderclap cannon" (飛雲霹靂炮; feiyun pili pao). Sourceb Grenade wikipedia.org/wiki/Grenade#Early_grenades
    1
  26626.  @kirakamu9246  About composite bows, Chinese invented crossbows that allow untrained peasants to face off against skilled bowmen on a more equal footing. The earliest known crossbows were invented in the first millennium BC, not later than the 7th century BC in ancient China. Source: Crossbow wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossbow#History We know this because crossbow triggers have been found buried in Chinese tombs, where the wooden parts has eroded away, leaving the bronze triggers behind.
    1
  26627.  @kirakamu9246  Chinese are arguably among the most diligent and intelligent people in the world. Having the world's largest population, China has (statistically speaking) the most brainpower to come up with plans and ideas, as well as the most manpower to implement said plans and turn ideas into reality. Larger populations have more geniuses, and since China's population is 4x that of USA, there should be at least 4 Chinese geniuses to every 1 American genius. Source: China's Statistical Advantage: Large populations have more geniuses http://iiipublishing.com/blog/2018/06/blog_06_07_2018.html Consider two standard bell curves, say one with 1.4 billion people and one with 326 million. The number of average people in China is very close to 4.3 times the number of average people in the U.S. That is also true for those in the top 2% say, which produces scientists, the best business and government people, and the most competent computer programmers. Even there, China would have a 4.3 to 1 advantage, which would be quite an advantage, everything else being equal.
    1
  26628.  @kirakamu9246  These poor Chinese parents, they live frugal lives, saving up money to send their kids to school to learn English and seek a better life than their parents. The Chinese kids strive for high grades where possible, they try not to party their life away or get involved in drugs, and when they graduate, they take on stereotypical Chinese white collar jobs like lawyer, doctors, dentists, engineers, scientist, mathematicians, computer programmers, bankers, businessmen, you name it, Chinese workers are qualified for it. This is the essence of Confucian virtues (that you keep mocking) that brought success to Chinese who were poor. Imagine all of these happening a billion times and that's how China transformed from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country in the past, into an economic juggernaut today, the world's factory (Made in China) a growing scientific and technological power, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army.
    1
  26629.  @kirakamu9246  The throne of China is an ambitious prize that many have fought for, spilled blood and sacrificed much to obtain. Chinese Emperors trusted no men able to sire heirs that aren't of the Royal Imperial family, in the Imperial harem, so only eunuchs were permitted to stay in the Imperial harem. Such men sacrifice much, but they gain the Emperor's favour and bring wealth back to their impoverished families back in their home province. This is a glimpse of China's political system which has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilizations. Rather than apply your own biased modern interpretation, why not analyse the logic and necessity behind such practices at that time?
    1
  26630.  @kirakamu9246  China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank has commanded healthy respect from international observers, as its performance parameters are equal to many top Western designs (like the Russian T-90 and the US M1 Abrams), and the Type 99 also packs a few unique tricks of its own. Source: China's Deadly Type 99 Tank vs. Russia's T-90 and America's M-1 Abrams nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/chinas-deadly-type-99-tank-vs-russias-t-90-americas-m-1-17836 China's Type 99 Main Battle Tank was even featured in our 70th anniversary National Day parade. Video: China's new generation main battlefield tanks revealed in National Day Parade youtu.be/Ec4Bu2orKTk
    1
  26631.  @kirakamu9246  If you want to talk about country's dependency, look no further than the world's dependence on China for Rare Earth metals. China controls 90% of the world's rare earth production, which are necessary components in phone screens, TV screens, DVDs, LCD, LED lights, rechargeable batteries, hard disks, magnets, fibre optics, lasers, wind turbines, solar panels, oil refineries, aircraft engines, jet engines, etc. Your own phone, computer, TV, makes use of Rare Earth Metals, of which China controls 90% of global production, that's how dependent the world is on China for materials relating to technology.
    1
  26632.  @kirakamu9246  Take smartphones for example, and China has produced many successful smartphone companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Lenovo, ZTE, OnePlus, Tecno, and so on. Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 1st place : Samsung (South Korean) 2nd Place : Apple (American) 3rd Place : Huawei (Chinese) 4th Place : Oppo (Chinese) 5th Place : Vivo (Chinese) 6th Place : Xiaomi (Chinese) 7th Place : LG (South Korean) 8th Place : Lenovo (Chinese) 9th Place : ZTE (Chinese) 10th Place : Alcatel-Lucent (French) ... Source: Top 10 Global Smartphone Brands in 2019 mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-brand-lists/17610-top-10-global-mobile-phone-brands.html But where are the famous companies from Thailand to compare with China?
    1
  26633.  @kirakamu9246  China has inducted the world's first operational anti-ship ballistic missile, a "carrier killer" capable of carrying both conventional and nuclear warheads, known as the DF-21D. Video: China DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile 1080pHD youtu.be/p-cEunmqXM8 It's launched from a mobile land launcher and able to target an aircraft carrier strike group on the sea, using its advanced maneuverability systems to evade anti-missile defenses and is even capable of "terminal guidance", making last minute adjustments in it's trajectories just seconds before impact.
    1
  26634.  @kirakamu9246  If eating these "red pills" have demonstrated a marked improvement of the mental, physical and spiritual well-being of people as important as Emperors, then what's wrong with it? Menstrual discharge may contain nutrients and provide health benefits, but this knowledge has been lost to time or because of different set of virtues. I mean, pregnant mothers have eaten their placentas and reported it raising their energies, immunities, nourishes the exhausted mother, reduce post natal depression, encourage milk production, and so on. Source: Eating the placenta babycenter.com/baby/postpartum-health/eating-the-placenta_40008062 And the placenta is sometimes consumed in the form of capsules, much like the "red pills" you described.
    1
  26635.  @kirakamu9246  Animals do it. Chinese medicine has advocated it for centuries. While eating your placenta, called placentophagy, isn't a new idea, it’s been getting a lot of buzz in recent years. whattoexpect.com/pregnancy/ask-heidi/eating-the-placenta.aspx
    1
  26636.  @kirakamu9246  Rockets were literally invented in ancient China. The first gunpowder-powered rockets evolved in medieval China under the Song dynasty by the 13th century. The oldest known depiction of rocket arrows came from the Huolongjing 《火龙经》 Source: Rocket wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket#History Therefore, is China the father of all rocket based technology, according to your logic?
    1
  26637.  @kirakamu9246  China is home to the world's longest range ICBM, the DF-41 with operational range between 12,000 km to 15,000 km, surpassing the US LGM-30 Minuteman range of 13,000 km. Video: China missile test DF-41 launch from railroad train youtu.be/h2kjMctT8yU?t=13
    1
  26638.  @kirakamu9246  China's Type 99 or ZTZ-99 is 3rd generation battle tank that is ranked among the World's Top 10 Main Battle Tanks, with advanced features including: -a fully stabilised smoothbore gun with autoloader, capable of firing anti-tank sniper missiles, and speculated to be able to penetrate the armour of the US M1 Abrams at close range with tungsten rounds. -Composite armour hull with front portion and turret protected by explosive reactive armour that resist enemy shell penetration. -A multi-layered radar system that detects and denotates incoming enemy missiles before impact. -A laser warning receiver that warns the tank commander that the tank is being painted by hostile lasers. Source: China showcases Type 99 Battle Tank youtu.be/ktniek01Xyw Source: Top 10 Most Powerful Tanks youtu.be/M3n6q_dTjfk?t=385 And its up there with the fastest to boot, equipped with turbo-charged engine providing a maximum road speed of 50 mph (80 kph).
    1
  26639.  @kirakamu9246  China has even sent people into space. In 2003, Yang Liwei became the first person sent into space by the Chinese space program, on board Shenzhou-5 (神舟五号) spacecraft. Video: Yang Liwei: China's first astronaut in space youtu.be/tIviKg4Mduw This makes China the world's 3rd country to independently conduct human spaceflight. China is the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat, even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not conducted independent manned space missions of their own thus far.
    1
  26640.  @kirakamu9246  All those electronics, turbines, jet engines, rocket circuitry, camera screens, they make use of Rare Earth metals, of which China controls 90% of global Rare Earth production. Even your phone camera, screen, LED light etc make use of Rare Earth metals and have a 90% chance of coming from China, so according to your logic, that means China is your father?
    1
  26641.  @kirakamu9246  According to your logic, China is the father of Japan and Korea? Take Han Chinese traditional clothing Hanfu (汉服) for example and it has 5,000 years of history and even the Japanese Kimono and Korean Hanbok clothing have their origins in Chinese Hanfu. Video: Beautiful Traditional Costume: Han Chinese Clothing (Hanfu) youtu.be/T6CucJxiWec?t=5
    1
  26642.  @kirakamu9246  China even has hypersonic missiles like the DF-ZF, which have been tested 7 times already and travels at speeds between 4,000 and 7,000 miles per hour. Source: China Successfully Tests Hypersonic Missile freebeacon.com/national-security/china-successfully-tests-hypersonic-missile/ U.S. intelligence officials have assessed that China plans to use the glider to deliver nuclear weapons through increasingly sophisticated missile defenses. The DF-ZF also could be used as part of a conventional strategic strike weapon capable of hitting targets around the world within an hour.
    1
  26643.  @kirakamu9246  In 2008, China even conducted our very own "spacewalk" where Chinese taikonaut exited Shenzhou-7 (神舟七号) spacecraft into outer space. Video: Chinese astronaut makes nation's first spacewalk youtu.be/9PAkbT4kTpI?t=280 China is the world's 3rd country to successfully conduct extravehicular activity in space, after USA and USSR, as well as being the 1st Asian country to achieve such a feat. Even other Asian countries like Japan, Korea and India have not achieved such a feat.
    1
  26644.  @kirakamu9246  Hukou system is to ensure that everyone in China don't all rush to go live in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, etc and so on. It's a common story in the United States: someone from the countryside move to New York, can't afford apartment, can't find a job, can't afford rent, gets evicted, becomes homeless and propagate the poverty cycle. According to Kishore Mahbubani, the USA is the only developed country where the bottom of 50% of income groups have grown poorer. The Hukou system in China ensures that our top cities are not swamped by rural immigrants and tax the cities resources to overcapacity. It's a harsh but a necessary measure regardless.
    1
  26645.  @kirakamu9246  The spoken dialects of Chinese (Mandarin, Cantonese, Shanghainese, etc) may be different, but the written form of Chinese characters is recognisable between different provinces of China. Chinese characters constitute the oldest continuously used system of writing in the world, having been used since 1200 BCE and today, Mandarin Chinese is the most spoken language in the world by number of speakers. Whereas other ancient scripts like Sumerian Cuneiform (Mesopotamia) Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered dead languages today, since they are no longer evolving with the times and no new words being added into their vocabulary. Source: Chinese characters wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_characters
    1
  26646.  @kirakamu9246  China been invaded by Khitans, Xiongnu, Jurchens, etc then why is the world so afraid of China? If we are as weak as you say, then obviously China poses threat to the world, you can rest easy. Just go back to sleep, why harbor so much pent up resentment for a weak country like you claimed?
    1
  26647.  @fcl3294  "神州 Shenzhou Whataboutism" You're the one who brought up PBS documentary blocked in China, then why can't I bring up Chinese documentary "China's War on Poverty" being blocked by PBS? If our documentary did not meet PBS editorial standards, then I can also claim that the PBS documentary did not meet China's standards, that's why it was blocked in China. It's tit-for-tat. If the PBS documentary is funded by anti-China organisations then China reserves the right to block it, just as PBS did over allegations of funding. …… You said "Is youtube available in the PRC? - NO" Who said YouTube is not available in China? Nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China, which person has been arrested just for doing so?
    1
  26648.  @fcl3294  But I've already shown that the "Tiananmen Square Massacre" is a Myth propagated by the British and it's clearly wrong, even Wikileaks has shown there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989. …… You said: "The pictures and films of June 4th 1989 reminds me of Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968 and the Soviet invasion of Hungry in 1956. It seems that totalitarian dictatorships have no compunction about using the military against the people in order to stay in power." It also reminds me of January 6th Capitol Hill riots in Washington, where angry Trump supporters stormed Capitol Hill and the US National Guard was called in to deal with the situation. Source: Photos Circulate of National Guard Members in Riot Gear Sleeping in Capitol msn.com/en-us/news/us/photos-circulate-of-national-guard-members-in-riot-gear-sleeping-in-capitol/ar-BB1cJ4FZ It shows that USA has no compunctions about calling in the their National Guard to deal with civilians.
    1
  26649.  @kirakamu9246  About China's space exploration, China has even landed on the Moon. In 2013, China landed our very own lunar spacecraft and lunar rover (Chang'e 3 嫦娥-3 and Yutu 玉兔 "Jade Rabbit") on the Moon, making China the world's 3rd nation to make a soft-landing on Earth's celestial neighbor. Source: China Lands On The Moon space.com/23968-china-moon-rover-historic-lunar-landing.html In October 2015, the Jade Rabbit set the record for the longest operational period for a rover on the Moon. The rover's ground penetrating radar found evidence of at least 9 distinct rock layers. Video: China moon landing video: 'Jade Rabbit' rover soft-lands on lunar surface youtu.be/XpAwmVPT758 Through this, China is showing that Chinese people are capable of achieving equally impressive feats as Westerners in space.
    1
  26650.  @kirakamu9246  About Education in China, Chinese students scored the highest in the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment or PISA in all 3 subjects: reading, science and mathematics. Source: Chinese Students Top Latest PISA Education Survey learningenglish.voanews.com/a/chinese-students-top-latest-pisa-education-survey/5191518.html PISA 2018 ranking for Mathematics 1. China (591) 2. Singapore (569) 3. Macau, China (558) 4. Hong Kong, China (551) 5. Taiwan, China (531) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Science 1. China (590) 2. Singapore (551) 3. Macau, China (544) 4. Vietnam (543) 5. Estonia (530) ... PISA 2018 ranking for Reading 1. China (555) 2. Singapore (549) 3. Macau, China (525) 4. Hong Kong, China (524) 5. Estonia (523) ... Source: Programme for International Student Assessment wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment#PISA_2018_ranking_summary
    1
  26651.  @kirakamu9246  If you believe China is a very weak country, then you can rest easy. Close your eyes and go back to sleep, knowing that China is a weak country in your dreams. Why harbor so much pent up anger towards what you perceive as a weak slave country?
    1
  26652.  @fcl3294  When did I deflect the question onto another topic? Clearly, the topic is about Tiananmen Square Massacre itself, you're the one trying to move the goalpost to the outside of Tiananmen Square. And I have already stood by my answer, that Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British and it's been proven by Wikileaks that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, so when did I deflect the topic? I shown evidence supporting my argument that nothing happened inside Tiananmen Square except for a military unit entering the Square and allowing students who remained in the square to leave peacefully. I have not deviated from the topic one bit and I have stuck to the original topic. You are the one clearly trying to change the topic here not me.
    1
  26653.  @fcl3294  So if Chinese documentary "China's War on Poverty" did not meet PBS editorial standards, then can't China not allow PBS documentary to be shown in China if it doesn't meet China's editorial standards? The PBS documentary funding comes from anti-China establishments so can't China reserve the right not to publish it? I'm saying that nobody will come arrest you just for login into YouTube while in China. You can always use VPN to access YouTube while in China, even watch that PBS documentary you described while in China, and nobody will come arrest you just for doing so.
    1
  26654.  @fcl3294  Why are you deliberately trying to change the topic? The original topic was about Tiananmen Square Massacre, and I have already proven that it's a Myth propagated by the British. All verified eyewitness accounts say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Yet you're accusing me of changing the topic when I stuck to the original topic all this time?
    1
  26655.  @fcl3294  Having a VPN helps protect your online privacy much better. VPN can also help you get better deals online if you select different countries. More users nowadays are using VPN for its numerous benefits. How was Zhang Tao "penalised"? Was he sentenced to jail or just given a warning? As long as you use government-approved VPN providers while in China, then the government will leave you alone. But if you use illegal VPN provider while in China then you're breaking the law.
    1
  26656.  @jjbuzz9230  Those Chinese abroad who claimed to personally witnessed Tiananmen Square Massacre have been debunked. According to my Jay Matthews source: a Qinghua University student described machine guns mowing down students in front of the Monument to the People’s Heroes in the middle of the square. The New York Times gave this version prominent display on June 12, just a week after the event, but no evidence was ever found to confirm the account or verify the existence of the alleged witness. (So where is the evidence to substantiate the gunning down of students in the Middle of the Square?) Also… Student leader Wu’er Kaixi said he had seen 200 students cut down by gunfire, but it was later proven that he left the square several hours before the events he described allegedly occurred. (So how could Wu’er Kaixi have seen those 200 students cut down by gunfire, when he left the square several hours before?) So what makes you think just because you personally know one of those refugees yourself, that what he or she said is true? Even Wikileaks has shown there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989.
    1
  26657.  @jjbuzz9230  You really think China can control the thoughts and actions of all 1.4 billion people in China? Haven't you been on Chinese social media like WeChat, Sina Weibo, Renren, Pengyou, QQ Tencent Video, Xiao HongShu, Douban, Toutiao, Kuaishou, and see what Chinese people say about our government? Even offline, have you talked to Chinese people ourselves and sound out our political views, before making such a claim?
    1
  26658.  @jjbuzz9230  So if according to you, TV anchors are forced to brainwashed our people to raise our kids in China, then why are there still so many Chinese international students flooding Western schools and universities? China sends more students overseas than any other country in the world. Source: China is now world's biggest source of international students scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1797429/china-now-worlds-biggest-source-international-students-more
    1
  26659.  @jjbuzz9230  What's wrong with promoting popular TV shows with interesting storylines and popular celebrities? Did you know that Chinese drama Story of Yanxi Palace 《延禧攻略》was the most Googled show of 2018? Source: Yanxi Palace: The most Googled show on Earth bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-46630781 If China's soft power is growing to match other Asian countries like Japanese Anime or Korean K-pop, then what's wrong with China investing and promoting Chinese dramas?
    1
  26660.  @jjbuzz9230   You said: "That means if you post a review on a Chinese shopping site, you can will need to use your real identity." Because posting anonymous reviews can lead to fake reviews. People give 5-star rating for inferior products, or 0-star rating if they are hired by rival companies. Using real identity helps to verify reviews and reduce the spread of fake reviews, which has proliferated in every area of e-commerce, from electronics to clothes to books to children’s toys. Review tracking website Fakespot, which analyzes reviews from popular e-commerce sites, estimates that a third of online reviews on sites like Walmart.com, Amazon.com, and Sephora.com are fake. WSJ reported that the three retailers have disputed Fakespot’s findings, but have also taken steps to improve the reliability of reviews on their platforms. The US Federal Trade Commission recently revealed that beauty brand Sunday Riley faked reviews of its own products on Sephora’s website for more than two years. Just this week, online gaming service Steam deleted nearly 3,000 glitchy, low-quality games from its storefront, many of which lured buyers with fake reviews. …… In my opinion, if you shop online from a particular website, then you are at least obliged to reveal your identity and give your honest review. Why allow people who may not even shop online at all, to give fake review of products that they probably never used?
    1
  26661.  The Hate Factory  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳. Mao and the communists succeeded in reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed under Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. When Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  26662.  The Hate Factory  Chairman Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulted in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he could, he'll wish for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism. Yet why is he classified as a mass murderer, when those people starved to death because of Great Chinese Famine?
    1
  26663.  @jjbuzz9230  Your link doesn't work, it says 404 您要找的内容不存在！Besides, Epoch Times is Falun Gong media, which always paint negative image of the Communist Party of China, and Falun Gong is actually a cult in disguise. I've already given several sources showing that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, including Wikileaks examples.
    1
  26664.  @jjbuzz9230  A Chilean diplomat (Carlos Gallo) provides an eye-witness account of the soldiers entering Tiananmen Square: He watched the military enter the square and did not observe any mass firing of weapons into the crowds, although sporadic gunfire was heard. He said that most of the troops which entered the square were actually armed only with anti-riot gear — truncheons and wooden clubs; they were backed up by armed soldiers.” A following cable stated: “A Chilean diplomat provides an eye-witness account of the soldiers entering Tiananmen Square: Although gunfire could be heard, he said that apart from some beating of students, there was no mass firing into the crowd of students at the monument.” Source:wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/89BEIJING18828_a.html
    1
  26665.  @jjbuzz9230  Which Chinese social media like WeChat, Sina Weibo, Renren, Pengyou, QQ Tencent Video, Xiao HongShu, Douban, Toutiao, Kuaishou, have you been on?
    1
  26666.  @abbotsful  What's your problem with whether I'm born late or not? I've already shown that Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053 (By Gregory Clark) and even Wikileaks has shown there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989.
    1
  26667.  @abbotsful  Did you watch the launch of China's Shenzhou-12 (神周-12) manned spacecraft, carrying taikonauts Nie Haisheng, Liu Boming and Tang Hongbo, to the Chinese Space Station's core module Tianhe (天和)? Video: Live: Special coverage on Shenzhou-12 crewed mission to Chinese Space Station youtu.be/cburnLophMs
    1
  26668.  @abbotsful  Yes, China's space milestones are mounting, with the lunar landing on the far side of the Moon, lunar rock samples collection, Zhurong landing on Mars, and now launching our Shenzhou-12 manned spacecraft to Tianhe core module of the our space station. I'm personally glad that I'm born at the point in time, to witness China's rise from a once dirt-poor, starving country in the past, into an economic juggernaut today, the factory of the world and a growing spacefaring nation. It shows that Chinese are just as capable of making equally amazing accomplishments in space as other people.
    1
  26669.  @jansg405  Go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of _Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan._Here's a map of all the territory Taiwan claims: (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  26670.  @abbotsful  What's the point then? You said you have no problem with me being so born late (you said: "神州 Shenzhou no problem of mine") then can't I point out how glad I am to be born in a time where China's space exploration millstones are mounting?
    1
  26671. @Leo Lam Agreed, whereas many Americans are stuck inside their bubble. Many aren't aware of the developments happening in China and many consider the thought of actually "learning something from China" absurd and utterly ridiculous.
    1
  26672.  @abbotsful  You said: "and it's the history written by the party that you believe." I literally gave sources from Gregory Clark and Jay Matthews, even Wikileaks has shown there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, so is this really written by the Communist Party of China? Since you claimed earlier that you have no problem (you said: "神州 Shenzhou no problem of mine,") then what is your problem?
    1
  26673.  @abbotsful  You said "it's the history written by the party that you believe." but I have already proven using Western sources like Jay Matthews and Gregory Clark that Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth. Do you agree that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989? Even Wikileaks has shown that Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth.
    1
  26674.  @abbotsful  But we are clearly talking about Tiananmen Square Massacre itself, why are you extending it to outside Tiananmen Square? Aren't you deliberately trying to shift the goalpost of this discussion?
    1
  26675.  @nicholaslee5473  About Chinese using English to count in kick boxing during sparring training, since the sparring is held in China, then not all participants understand counting in English. The instructions and countdown should be in a language understandable/comfortable to all participants in such an event. Remember that China has many mutually unintelligible dialects and Mandarin is the common dialect. Secondly, learning about the West is not just limited to language alone, it can be about learning about Western politics, economics, geography, literature, culture, movies, comicbook heros, games, etc.
    1
  26676.  @nicholaslee5473  Mandarin Chinese is the world's most spoken language by number of native speakers. Learning Chinese enables one to communicate with estimated 20% of the world's population. The 10 Most Spoken Languages In The World 1. Chinese — 1.3 Billion Native Speakers 2. Spanish — 471 Million Native Speakers 3. English — 370 Million Native Speakers 4. Hindi — 342 Million Native Speakers 5. Arabic — 315 Million Native Speakers 6. Portuguese — 232 Million Native Speakers 7. Bengali — 229 Million Native Speakers 8. Russian — 154 Million Native Speakers 9. Japanese — 126 Million Native Speakers 10. Lahnda (Western Punjabi) — 118 Million Native Speakers Source: The 10 Most Spoken Languages In The World babbel.com/en/magazine/the-10-most-spoken-languages-in-the-world
    1
  26677.  @abbotsful  "神州 Shenzhou no, the massacre was all about the demonstrations in Tiananmen Square" Yes, but I have cited several Western sources like Jay Matthews, Gregory Clark, and even Wikileaks, showing that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, so the Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth that's all. Do you agree that there was no bloodshed in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989?
    1
  26678.  @nicholaslee5473  Chinese languages are spoken all across the globe. Virtually every major city in the world has their own "Chinatown" where people can gather to appreciate Chinese culture and sample Chinese cuisine. Chinese characters can be seen written on street signs and restaurant menus in Chinatowns all over the globe. Learning Mandarin Chinese enables one to at least communicate with up to a fifth of the world's population. Before 2019, Chinese tourists can be found all over the world, spending money on your economy, so much such that more and more tourists agencies were offering tours in Mandarin to cater to Chinese tourists. Even Western schools and universities were positively flooded with Chinese international students studying the same topics as their peers.
    1
  26679.  @nicholaslee5473  About Chinese cultural icons making it to the West, there's Chinatowns in virtually every major city in the world, like I mentioned earlier. There's Chinese Kung Fu movies, that featured martial artists like Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Donnie Yen, etc that are popular. Chinese food is also famous all over the world, there's statistic that there are around 40,000 Chinese restaurants in the USA. That's already more Chinese Restaurants in US than McDonald's stores worldwide. Source: More Chinese Restaurants in US than McDonald's Stores Worldwide studyinchina.com.my/web/page/more-chinese-restaurants-in-us-than-mcdonalds/
    1
  26680.  @abbotsful  I agree that there were indeed student demonstrations inside Tiananmen Square itself. However, all verified eyewitness accounts say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night, according to Gregory Clark. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Source: Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies ibtimes.co.uk/tiananmen-square-massacre-myth-all-were-remembering-are-british-lies-1451053 (By Gregory Clark)
    1
  26681.  @nicholaslee5473  You yourself brought up consumerism when you mentioned McDonald’s, Hollywood, basketball, football, in China, then can't I bring up the statistic that there are more Chinese restaurants in USA than McDonald’s stores worldwide? Video: More Chinese restaurants in US than McDonald’s stores worldwide youtu.be/6PQzUKxb48M Experts estimate that there are more than 40,000 Chinese restaurants in the US now, a number that outstrips the total number of McDonald’s outlets in the world, estimated at 36,000. Chinese food has been around in the US since the mid-1800s, when a huge influx of Chinese immigrants came to California during the Gold Rush. About Hollywood, China has our own movie studio (in fact, the world's largest outdoor film studio) to film Chinese movies such as martial arts flicks and period historical dramas in China. Video: The Largest Outdoor Film Studio is Actually in China youtu.be/pWjsD-tJ9ss Hengdian World Studios, better known as 'Chinawood,' is the biggest outdoor movie set in the world. From ancient temples to modern streets, it's more than the size of Paramount and Universal, combined.
    1
  26682.  @nicholaslee5473  About incentives to learn the Chinese language, its no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set and many economists firmly believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's economy sometime in the foreseeable future. Because of this, there is an incentive to learn Mandarin Chinese because business opportunities abound in China, especially once China eventually overtakes the USA. For example, when it comes to book publishing, China produced 470,000 new titles while the United States churned out just under 339,000. The United Kingdom rounded off the top three with 173,000 books. Source: Which Countries Produce The Most Books? statista.com/chart/12358/which-countries-produce-the-most-books/ Countries by books published in 2015 1. China (470,000) 2. United States (338,986) 3. United Kingdom (173,000) 4. France (106,760) 5. Germany (89,506) 6. Brazil (88,685) 7. Japan (76,445) …… Given that China publishes more books than any other in the world is an incentive to learn Chinese language.
    1
  26683.  @nicholaslee5473  About incentives to learn Chinese, China actually publishes more research papers than any other in the world, over a wide range of topics such as physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering and technology, and earth and space sciences. Countries by published scientific papers in 2018: 1. China (528,263 articles) 2. United States (422,808 articles) 3. India (135,788 articles) 4. Germany (104,396 articles) 5. Japan (98,793 articles) 6. United Kingdom (97,681 articles) 7. Russia (81,579 8. Italy (71,240 articles) 9. South Korea (66,376 articles) ... Source: List of countries by number of scientific and technical journal articles wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_scientific_and_technical_journal_articles This implies that Chinese as a language is going to grow in importance as more scientific discoveries are being made in China, and new scientific concepts, ideas, terminologies, are being made in Chinese language. This provides an impetus for Western scientists and researchers to learn Chinese in order to gain access to new discoveries being made in China.
    1
  26684.  @nicholaslee5473  As China's domestic film market grows in size, Hollywood is increasingly catering more movies to suit Chinese audiences (it's the largest movie market outside of the USA). What this implies is that more Chinese/Asian actors and actresses possibly get cast into Hollywood movies in order to pique the interest of Chinese audiences. This is my personal opinion, but as a Chinese myself, I wish there were more Chinese/Asian actors on screen in Hollywood movies. There is good representation of African Americans in Hollywood movies, but less so for Asian Americans. In Hollywood, most Asian actors/actresses often get casted into stereotypical "Asian roles" like nerds, martial artists, sidekicks (Kato in Green Hornet), triad gangsters, dragon ladies, tiger moms, china dolls, prostitutes, damsels in distress (for Caucasian male lead to save) and other minor roles. If China's growing movie market is impacting Hollywood to produce films that cater more to Chinese tastes, then I personally support having more Asian actors/actresses on screen, cast into various different roles, even if just to gain more fame and acting experience for themselves.
    1
  26685.  @abbotsful  Yes, there was student demonstrations inside Tiananmen Square itself, and the army was sent into the Square. However, according to Jay Matthews, reporter The Washington Post as far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 and all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully. Source: The Myth of Tiananmen: And the price of a passive press (By Jay Mathews) archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php But earlier, why did you say "it's the history written by the party that you believe." when I have already proven using Western sources like Jay Matthews and Gregory Clark, that Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth?
    1
  26686.  @nicholaslee5473  Because those Chinese research articles have obviously been translated into English in the Institute for Scientific Information in order to be understood by Western scientists. However, everyone knows that during the process of translating from one language to another, some expressions or meanings may be loss through translation. As for the high quantity of publications, China is a relative new-comer to the scientific publications industry. The reason the Chinese government incentivised publications to produce quantity over quality is to build up our initial base. Our scientists started publishing literally from scratch, so publishing huge quantities of papers is needed to gain experience and build up our foundation, of which we can work on to improve on quality publication later. This is the strategy adopted by China to rise in the scientific research fields. …… You said: "This is the classical example of China being China. The global scientific community shares research which is why they use English as a medium." This is where the Western "racist" mindset kicks in. The reason why the Western countries are able to maintain their dominance in the scientific fields, is because they force other non-English speaking countries to adhere to using English in their publications. China is under no obligation to use English for our scientific publications, if Western scientists want access to Chinese papers, then they'll have to learn Chinese in order to fully comprehend the concepts, ideas and terminologies being discussed among Chinese scientists. …… You said: "Publishing it in Mandarin is not an efficient way for technological progress at all for the global scientific community. It's a hoarding behavior and while it may make it easier for scientists in China, it's incompatibility with the world's journals make it even less accurate." I disagree with this accessment. A non-English speaking scientist is more comfortable with his/her own native language, and it may not be efficient for the scientist to communicate concepts and ideas if forced to use only English terminologies. Your statement suggests that non-English speaking countries need to bow down to the power of the West in the scientific fields. And I also disagree that just because Chinese journals may not be compatible with Western journals doesn't imply our publication is inaccurate. China is building up a baseline of scientific publications of our own (like you said earlier) and while it is true that currently it is more quantity than quality, our repository of research publications is only going to improve as time goes by, until hopefully it will become an acceptable and reliable pillar of Chinese scientific publications. …… You said: "Scientific research journals need citations and references from other works, if you are only able to publish in Chinese, you lose a lot of revelant sources which are not in Chinese." This is where the repository of Chinese publications comes into players. Right now the baseline is more quantity than quality like you said, but it's expected to improve with time. I also think Western countries are perhaps a little too obsessed with citations, so much such that the practical applications of their papers are oftentimes overlooked. In the West, researchers often have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products. …… Lastly, while China may be cutting funding to poor publications, China's R&D expenditure ranks 2nd in the world after the USA. Here is a list of countries by R&D spending. Countries by R&D Spending 1. United States ($612.714 billion) 2. China ($514.798 billion) 3. Japan ($172.614 billion) 4. Germany ($131.932 billion) 5. South Korea ($100.055 billion) 6. France ($63.658 billion) 7. India ($58.691 billion) 8. United Kingdom ($51.702 billion) …… Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending#List
    1
  26687.  @nicholaslee5473  Because Hollywood is driven by making profit in the Chinese movie market, that China can exert influence on Hollywood. For example, making them partner up with local Chinese film companies to co-produce films, possibly casting more Chinese/Asian actors and actresses in order to cater to Chinese audience's tastes, and to allow Asian actors/actresses to gain valuable acting experience and to become more visible in the market. In alien movies, fChinese/Asians are humans* too, the Americans see no problem with casting African Americans (i.e Will Smith in Independence Day) in alien flicks, then why not Asian Americans? …… You said: "African Americans are well-represented because they are Americans." Correct, but so are Asian Americans! Why do many Americans seem to forget that Asian Americans are also Americans? This is part of the perpetual foreigner stereotype that plagues Asian American society, because even though many of them are born in America, went to the same schools as other Americans, yet they are treated like outsiders that don't belong. Source: Perpetual foreigner wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_foreigner Hollywood is indeed experiencing a change because of China. The thing is that Hollywood consistently denies Asian actors/actresses roles in which where a character of Asian descent is played by a Caucasian actor/actress instead. For example, in the Hollywood the Ghost in the Shell movie, the protagonist, major Motoko Kusanagi is played by Caucasian actress Scarlett Johnson. Or the Ancient One of Doctor Strange movie was supposed to be of Tibetan descent, but was casted by Caucasian actress Tilda Swinton and this phenomena is known as white-washing. These are missed opportunities for Asian actors/actresses to get some much needed acting experience to improve their portfolios. The problem with stereotypes is that sometimes they can overwhelm. Even martial arts (which I also embraced as a defining feature of Chinese culture) can backfire, because Asian actors are complaining about how many Hollywood directors expect Asian actors to automatically "know Kung Fu" and to perform martial arts without a background in it. There are rare Hollywood movies where a Chinese/Asian actor takes the male lead, but oftentimes the romance is missing. Like Shanghai Noon, the kissing scenes were by Owen Wilson not Jackie Chan, it's this subtle attempt by Hollywood to paint Asians (especially men) as unattractive. Lastly, yes I agree that it takes skill for Asian actors to portray their roles convincingly. However, in an industry where Asian roles are white-washing, then how do people expect Asians to gain the necessary acting skills and acting experience, if denied the opportunity to shine and increase their exposure? This is the lack of Asian representation plaguing Hollywood today. Hopefully, China's movie market will influence Hollywood to cast more Asian actors/actresses to the give them greater opportunities to shine and gain valuable experience.
    1
  26688.  @abbotsful  I have long answered that nobody died that night in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, and I already gave you my sources. I mean, of course people die every day whether in hospitals, car accidents, falling injuries, and other things, how do you expect there to be absolutely no deaths in a country or city in a single night? We are clearly talking about Tiananmen Square Massacre and that it itself is a Myth, and nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. You're the one trying to change the subject because Tiananmen Square Massacre is a lie.
    1
  26689.  @abbotsful  You didn't even answer my question of why did you say "it's the history written by the party that you believe." when I have already proven using Western sources like Jay Matthews and Gregory Clark, that Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth?
    1
  26690.  @nicholaslee5473  I read your source and it says: Most scientific journals in China are not published in English, which has meant that much of current scientific development in China is not readily available to non–Chinese-speaking scientists. A large portion of these journals however, also have an abstract in English. It's not racist to use English language yes. But it is racist to think that China needs to be forced to adopt the use of English language in our scientific publications, just to contribute to global scientific advancements. English may be the lingua fraca of the 19th and 20th century, but that does not guarantee that it will be always be so, for the 21st century and beyond. And I never said that I'm forcing others towards use Chinese, I'm saying that "if Western scientists want access to Chinese papers, then they'll have to learn Chinese in order to fully comprehend the concepts, ideas and terminologies being discussed among Chinese scientists." I disagree that English was just adopted because it was easier to learn. When I first started learning English, I was confused by its grammatical rules (some that don't make sense) and the sheer volume of vocabulary that needed to be learned. Just take the days of the week for example and in English, it's Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday. But in Chinese it's just 星期一，星期二，星期三，星期四，星期五，星期六，星期天。(i.e Weekday 1, Weekday 2, Weekday 3, Weekday 4, ……) so if you know how to count in Chinese, then it's much easier rather memorising new words like Monday, Wednesday, etc. Even learning the months of the year like January, February, March, April, etc is another memorization headache for new English learners. Whereas in Chinese, the months are 一月，二月，三月， etc (i.e 1st Month, 2nd Month, 3rd Month, etc) About "China being China," China is charting our own path forward, then what's wrong with China following a path different from Western countries? It's no secret today that America is in decline, and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set and many economists firmly believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's economy sometime in the foreseeable future. If China can achieve this, then what's wrong with our "displays of power"? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w Scientists work best in their native languages, what if scientists being forced to use a non-familiar language (like English) is what's hampering actual scientific progress? About whether the information is less impactful globally, it depends on how quickly that scientific research can be put to use in actual applications, such as through tangible products or services. China has the advantage of a short idea-to-product transition time, especially if you come to Shenzhen the scientist's ideas get transformed into applications fast. I believe that my statement that "China is under no obligation to use English for our scientific publications." still stands. The main reason why English dominates the sciences is because many other non-English speaking countries are unable to develop their scientific vocabulary and terminologies to explain the scientific concepts in their native languages. That's why the English language continues to dominate the sciences. As a new-comer to modern scientific publishing, China is building our scientific base and developing our own scientific vocabulary to be on par with English scientific vocabulary someday.
    1
  26691.  @abbotsful  Currently, Hollywood casting Asian Americans doesn't cater to Chinese markets, because most of the Asian American actors/actresses are largely unknown to mainland China, and yes more mainland Chinese are familiar with our own actors/actresses than Asian Americans. It's because of the lack of exposure of Asian American actors in Hollywood film industries, that's why Chinese audiences are often unfamiliar with them. Asian Americans are also Americans too, and they have served in US military (3.7% as you said). It is improbable yes, but not impossible, and there have been numerous African Americans actors in Hollywood as well as Latino actors. A movie is a play that serves to entertain, but for actors and actresses, it's their lifeline and being casted in a movie increases their chances of catapulting into fame. I agree that at the current state, Asian Americans actors/actresses aren't as familiar a face as mainland Chinese actors/actresses, because of lack of exposure. You mentioned that putting mainland Chinese actors/actresses in lead roles feels out of context if they are not American, but why does Hollywood neglect to cast Asian Americans actors/actresses, who are there clearly to serve as a balance between American culture and Asian culture? The problem with Hollywood is that the lack of exposure of Asian Americans actors/actresses is devolving into a never ending cycle. Asian Americans who lack acting skills and experience aren't being casted. Yet at the same time, they need to be casted in more diverse roles to improve their acting skills and gain experience, so it becomes a never-ending cycle to keep Asian Americans actors/actress in a low profile. About Shanghai Noon, I thought it was an American movie, not a Chinese movie. The audience is expected to be American not Chinese, so why would Jackie Chan's role as an imperial guard frolicking with the emperor's daughter, outrage the audience? Hollywood is American yes, but America is home to many people of different races, including Asian Americans, yet cultural stereotypes about the "perpetual foreigner" still persist in USA and the opportunities for Asian actors in Hollywood are extremely limited. Only 5% of characters in 2017's top 100 grossing films were of Asian descent, with just 4 of the movies featuring an Asian lead character. And 37 of those Top 100 movies has no Asian actors at all. Video: Hollywood’s Asian Problem youtu.be/0L6IRJExiG0 Asian American actors/actresses need more exposure and to be casted in more roles to gain acting skills and experience. But few directors are willing to cast them in roles because they have little to no acting skills and experience. This is the problem plaguing Asian American actors in Hollywood.
    1
  26692.  @abbotsful  Are you watching Chinese taikonauts on board the Shenzhou-12 crewed mission to Chinese space station? It's live right now. Video: Special coverage on Shenzhou-12 crewed mission to Chinese Space Station youtu.be/BKfACBZR1ts
    1
  26693.  @nicholaslee5473  Who is considered the "average Joe" in the whole world? The entire population of the USA and Canada makes up 5% of the global population and the population of Europe makes up 10% so combined, Western countries make up 15% of the world's population.
    1
  26694.  @nicholaslee5473  According to your source: Most scientific journals in China are published in Chinese; a few have English translations of abstracts for research articles. Some 189 scientific journals are published in English, of which 29 are health-science journals. Most articles published in English-language scientific journals in China are indexed by Science Citation Index and Engineering Index. I never said that it's racist to use a single language to contribute to easier understanding of the world, I said that it is racist to think China needs to be forced to adopt the use of English language in our scientific publications, just to contribute to global scientific advancements. The reasons why many other non-English speaking countries are unable to fully develop their own scientific terminologies and vocabulary is because they use English language to explain scientific terms which deprives their own native language the opportunity to grow and evolve with science. In China, by publishing research articles in Chinese, our scientists are growing their scientific vocabulary in the process and expanding the use of Chinese in science. A simple poll or survey in English will obviously favor English as an easy language to learn, if conducted in English-speaking countries. But you if you approach this from a non-Native English speaker then it becomes difficult to learn. According to Oxford Royale Academy: Why Is English So Hard to Learn? oxford-royale.com/articles/learning-english-hard/ It’s often said that English is one of the hardest languages to learn. Given the fact that many of the words we use in English stem from Latin and Ancient Greek words – in common with many other European languages – what is it about English that has attracted this reputation for being so fearsomely difficult? It’s often said that English is one of the hardest languages to learn. Given the fact that many of the words we use in English stem from Latin and Ancient Greek words – in common with many other European languages – what is it about English that has attracted this reputation for being so fearsomely difficult? There's so much more about English that makes it difficult than just the 7 days of the week or the 12 months of the year. You said: "Chinese language has a unique sound for every word to ever exist." but this is untrue, at least in the case of Mandarin. Chinese has many homophones where the words sound the same, such as 由于/鱿鱼 (because/squid) 丫头/鸭头 (girl/duck head) and so on. Learning the sound of 26 English alphabets doesn't automatically guarantee that you can pronounce anything, but once you learned how to pronounce Chinese tones, they are repeated for different words that sound the same, there no real need to "learn a new sound." And even if you could pronounce an English word, you'll still have to memorise it's meaning to understand what the word means. Like memorising "Wednesday is the third day of the Week" or "September is the ninth month", it's basically the same memorising as Chinese characters, except that you can often derive meaning from Chinese characters. However, with the various combinations of 26 alphabets lead to a huge vocabulary of English words. As far as I know, China is not intentionally hoarding research, our scientists prefer to express themselves in their preferred form of language that's all and Chinese articles are available in Chinese to any scientists that wants to peruse them, so why are you accusing China of intentionally hoarding research? I agree that it's easier to start from something (if you know the language). But by starting from something it means that over time, you'll become overdependent on that source. Say for instance, USA decides to one day cut off China's access to scientific journals, then we will be in trouble had China chosen to be over reliant on US scientific publications.
    1
  26695.  @abbotsful  What party's deception and denial? I already said that Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth and there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989. Yes, a military unit did enter the Square, however all verified eyewitness accounts say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. You're the one deliberately trying to promote the myth of Tiananmen Square Massacre. And how's this the party's deception when my sources are from Westerners like Jay Matthews and Gregory Clark?
    1
  26696.  @nicholaslee5473  Currently, Hollywood casting Asian Americans doesn't cater to Chinese markets, because most of the Asian American actors/actresses are largely unknown to mainland China, and yes more mainland Chinese are familiar with our own actors/actresses than Asian Americans. It's because of the lack of exposure of Asian American actors in Hollywood film industries, that's why Chinese audiences are often unfamiliar with them. Asian Americans are also Americans too, and they have served in US military (3.7% as you said). It is improbable yes, but not impossible, and there have been numerous African Americans actors in Hollywood as well as Latino actors. A movie is a play that serves to entertain, but for actors and actresses, it's their lifeline and being casted in a movie increases their chances of catapulting into fame. I agree that at the current state, Asian Americans actors/actresses aren't as familiar a face as mainland Chinese actors/actresses, because of lack of exposure. You mentioned that putting mainland Chinese actors/actresses in lead roles feels out of context if they are not American, but why does Hollywood neglect to cast Asian Americans actors/actresses, who are there clearly to serve as a balance between American culture and Asian culture? The problem with Hollywood is that the lack of exposure of Asian Americans actors/actresses is devolving into a never ending cycle. Asian Americans who lack acting skills and experience aren't being casted. Yet at the same time, they need to be casted in more diverse roles to improve their acting skills and gain experience, so it becomes a never-ending cycle to keep Asian Americans actors/actress in a low profile. About Shanghai Noon, I thought it was an American movie, not a Chinese movie. The audience is expected to be American not Chinese, so why would Jackie Chan's role as an imperial guard frolicking with the emperor's daughter, outrage the audience? Hollywood is American yes, but America is home to many people of different races, including Asian Americans, yet cultural stereotypes about the "perpetual foreigner" still persist in USA and the opportunities for Asian actors in Hollywood are extremely limited. Only 5% of characters in 2017's top 100 grossing films were of Asian descent, with just 4 of the movies featuring an Asian lead character. And 37 of those Top 100 movies has no Asian actors at all. Video: Hollywood’s Asian Problem youtu.be/0L6IRJExiG0 Asian American actors/actresses need more exposure and to be casted in more roles to gain acting skills and experience. But few directors are willing to cast them in roles because they have little to no acting skills and experience. This is the problem plaguing Asian American actors in Hollywood.
    1
  26697.  @nicholaslee5473  You said: "China's war is with the U.S." China does not want war, but that does not mean that China is afraid of war. Western countries' MSM are constantly painting China in a negative light and "demonising" our country, that's why China has no choice but to take necessary defensive measures. For example, Trump's tariffs and US sanctions on China is the US attempt to contain China's rise. American chips are banned from being used in China and Chinese companies like Huawei are banned in USA, others like Tik Tok (by Bytedance) and WeChat are being targeted, so possibly the same thing could happen when USA tries to lock China out of scientific publications. That's why China needs to take the necessary precautions against such possible actions, and to build up our scientific publications database of our own. Once again, I would like to reiterate that China does not hoard research, our scientific articles are clearly available in Chinese language for perusal by scientists and it is racist to think that China should alter our scientific publications to be in English. China is under no obligation to use English for scientific publications. While English was the lingua fraca of the 19th and 20th century, there is no guarantee that it will remain so for the 21st century and beyond. The English language was able to dominate the world through 19th century British colonialism as well as the 20th century United States emergence as a world superpower, but for the 21st century, it is forecasted to be an "Asian century" with the rise of China. It's true that currently, the English scientific database is strong and reliable with centuries of scientific work and China is a relative new-comer to the scene, however this may not always be the case in the future, as China builds upon our own scientific research database. I believe that although it's initially disadvantageous in the short term, the benefits of China's scientific research will eventually pay off in the long term, and China needs to take necessary defensive measures to guard against the US attempt to contain our rise. China has world's 2nd largest military spending, I agree, but impressive as it is, it still pales in comparison to the number 1 military spending in the world, the USA's. USA spends more money on defense than the next 10 countries' combined. List of countries by military expenditures 1. United States ($778.0 billion) 2. China ($253 billion) 3. India ($72.9 billion) 4. Russian Federation ($61.7 billion) 5. United Kingdom ($59.2 billion) 6. Saudi Arabia ($57.5 billion) 7. Germany ($52.8 billion) 8. France ($52.7 billion) 9. Japan ($49.1 billion) 10. South Korea ($45.7 billion) …… Source: List of countries by military expenditures wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures#Total_military_spending Indeed, China suffered under the Century of Humiliation (百年国耻) when Western powers invaded China and plundered our cultural artefacts (many of which are now on display in Western museums) and that's the driving force behind the "Chinese Dream" (中国梦) of the eventual rejuvenation of Chinese civilization. However, China does not seek to visit the atrocities commited on China onto the rest of the world. China doesn't seek revenge on the West per say, only to restore our country back to it's former glory before the 19th century Opium Wars. Looking at Chinese history, even at the height of China's power (say during the Ming Dynasty) China did not seek to colonise places that weren't previously under Han control. Ming Dynasty naval forces were among the most advanced of it's time and Admiral Zheng He 郑和 led a fleet of ships through seven voyages throughout the Indian Ocean, visiting Africa, India and the Middle East. However it was a peaceful merchant armada to trade with other countries, not conquer them like what the Western colonial powers did centuries later. Video: Crash Course History: Zheng He youtu.be/NjEGncridoQ?t=126 Given China's relatively peaceful nature during the height of Chinese civilization, I am inclined to think that China intends to preserve this peaceful form of coexistence if China becomes number one in the future. The question is not whether China will rise peaceful, it is whether China will be allowed to rise peacefully.
    1
  26698.  @abbotsful  I don't understand what exactly is your problem. You said earlier that "神州 Shenzhou I'm not going to argue with you Shenzhou…" then why are you constantly trying to pick an argument? I have made my stance very clear that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 and that it's a Myth, so if we are in agreement that nothing happened inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, then what seems to be the problem?
    1
  26699.  @nicholaslee5473  Here are 10 Infrastructure projects in Africa funded by China. 1. Coastal Railway, Nigeria 2. Bagamoyo Port, Tanzania. 3. Modderforntein New City Project, South Africa 4. Standard Gauge Railway, Kenya 5. Infrastructure for Mines Barter Deal, DRC 6. Chad-Sudan Railway 7. Mphanda Nkuwa Dam 8. Hydroelectric Station Project, Mozambique 9. Infrastructure Projects, Malawi 10. Port Sudan-Khartoum Railway Video: Top 10 Infrastructure Projects In Africa Funded By China youtu.be/TtduKDpy4oc China has done much to improve African countries in just decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries.
    1
  26700.  @abbotsful  I have already admitted that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 and my sources have already proven such. If you also agree that no one died that night in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 then we are in agreement. I really don't understand what concern it is of yours to constantly return to 1989 in China, most of China has already moved on, yet your mindset is still seemingly stuck in this era? As far as I know, you're not even Chinese citizen yourself.
    1
  26701.  @abbotsful  The truth is that the Chinese government did the right thing, given the circumstances surrounding China at that time. The proof is that most of China has since moved on from 1989 and have not let those demonstrations hinder China's progress and prosperity. So looking back, China clearly made the right call. Many Westerners just can't accept the fact that somehow, a non-liberal democratic country like China is able to move forward and quite possibly even surpass the United States some day in the foreseeable future. Even US allies like Canada, UK, Australia and the EU rather side with USA over China, and China needs to take necessary defensive measures against countries who wish to paint our country as "the enemy."
    1
  26702.  @abbotsful  What about those PLA Chinese soldiers getting burned alive because supposedly "peaceful" protestors threw petrol bombs and ignited military trucks and tanks? What about the PLA soldiers who refused to open fire, but got mobbed by unarmed "protestors" and had their rifles stolen and fired against them? Had the Chinese government not taken firm action at that time, then chaos would have erupted, possibly plunging China into civil strife and wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country. So clearly, China made the difficult but necessary decision at that time to ensure that stability returned to China and many people in China have since moved on from 1989. But many Westerners constantly want to return to 1989 because they don't want to wake up to a reality where China is faring well under the communist party leadership. I mean, what happened has happened, and time has shown that Chinese government made the right call, we are more prosperous today under the CPC, than any previous time in Chinese history. I have read many of your previous comments and come to the conclusion that you don't really care about China, except to criticize China maliciously. I mean, for what other reason do you constantly return to an event that most people in China have since moved on? People like you refuse to move on, because you're unable to accept the fact that Chinese government has since learnt valuable lessons from previous mistakes and take the necessary steps not to repeat them.
    1
  26703.  @abbotsful  You barely register any interest in China's positive achievements, look at your responses here and it's mostly just one-liners about China's achievements. Even your comment about computers was previously mentioned by me. About poverty in China, according to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Statista Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china …… I really don't understand what's your problem with whether I'm born late or not. You clearly stated earlier that you had "no problem" then why do you keep on bringing up whether I was born or not? And again, how did I buy up the "lies that covered it up" when I quoted Western sources like Jay Matthews and Gregory Clark? I never quoted anything regarding the Communist Party with regards to 1989, so why do you keep on claiming that "it's the history written by the party that you believe"? The Chinese government had been negotiating with the student protesters for months who said there was no negotiation? What makes you think a bunch of students (who haven't even graduated, find a job, get married, settle etc) would know how to govern China better than the Chinese government? Here's a video of Tiananmen Square negotiation between Deng Xiaoping with student protesters. (video:youtu.be/qPjwDXohuys ) The students were brash and aggressive, making unreasonable demands of Deng, to which Deng calmly refuted. …… Lastly, you yourself admitted that "it's true that you used to think that 1000s of students had been killed inside the square and that mass media has been lazy, possibly intentionally biased in their reporting". This is ironic, because earlier you repeatedly accused me of being born late and being fooled by the "history written by the party" but here you are, being born early (I assume, since you assumed I was born late) yet you were fooled by biased Western reporting of thousands of students killed inside Tiananmen Square. Can't you see how you've been fooled by Western reporting of Tiananmen Square, yet you accused me of being fooled by the history supposedly written by the communist party?
    1
  26704.  @nicholaslee5473  Even for the average Joe in America, who doesn't want to spend time in China or work here, it still pays to learn about China, because China is rising and going to play a bigger role about future affairs. Yet many Americans aren't interested in learning about other countries outside of America. Chinese Americans are American born and generations past true, but they have a link to China, whereas your average non-Chinese American has absolutely no heritage link to China whatsoever. More mainland Chinese are able to identify with a Chinese American, rather than a non-Chinese American. Yes it takes time to get to know new faces but all it takes is more exposure that's all. On one hand, you claim Hollywood needs China's box office so they cast mainland Chinese actors. On the other hand, you claim Hollywood putting people like these in lead roles is a problem because they are not American and would be very out of context if they were in the lead roles. So the solution is simple, just cast Asian American actors since they are Americans after all. Culture stereotypes is difficult to counter yes, but if you don't start somewhere, then it will never be countered. Hollywood has certainly been inclusive for African American and Latino American actors/actresses, but the same can't be said for Asian Americans. If Asians aren't being cast because of lack of acting skills or experience, then how are they going to gain acting skills and experience if they don't get cast? Video: Only 3 Asian Actors Have Won An Oscar...Ever youtu.be/0YZV8J_0nCw
    1
  26705.  @nicholaslee5473  Here's an African Perspective of China in Africa. Gyude Moore speaks about China's expanding presence in Africa at the University of Chicago. Video: Gyude Moore: “China in Africa: An African Perspective” youtu.be/P5uzxV8ub9k To sum it up, many Africans welcome Chinese investment in Africa, because of many factors such as China not imposing "additional" conditions on business, and how China treat Africans as treasured business partners. From the African perspective, it certainly seems like a win-win scenario.
    1
  26706.  @abbotsful  You have never been nice to me, you constantly accused me of "believing the history written by the party" even though I clearly cited Western sources, then why should I be nice to you? The truth is that you don't really care China, except to criticise China maliciously. I don't understand, why is it that you can bring up China's achievements in computing, then why is it when I do the same, it's being labelled as "China is awesome facts to throw at laowai"? Why can't I bring up positive achievements about China? Besides supercomputers, Chinese scientists also built quantum computing machine that is 24,000 times faster than international counterparts and 10-100 times faster than the first electronic computer, ENIAC. Source: World's First Quantum Computer Made By China fossbytes.com/worlds-first-quantum-computer-made-by-china/ The quantum computer is built by a team of Chinese scientists working at the University of Science and Technology of China, at Hefei in Anhui province. The researchers believe that quantum computing could excel the processing power of supercomputers. Pan Jianwei, a quantum physicist, and an academician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said that quantum computing makes use of quantum superposition principle for ultra-fast parallel calculation and simulation capabilities. …… Most Chinese have since moved on from 1989. But if you agree with me that no one died that night in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, then at least we are in agreement in this area. Do you? And my sources are from the West, like Matthews and Clark, then what makes you claim that it's from the Communist Party of China? The student protesters have been negotiating with the Chinese government for months since April till June 1989, so what other options are there? Again, what makes you think a bunch of university undergraduates somehow know the best way to govern China over the Chinese government? You outwardly admitted that you have been previously fooled by Western media claims of 1000s of deaths inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, it was actually thanks to me bringing up these issues to show that Tiananmen Square Massacre was a Myth. Yet you still make the assumption just because that "I'm born late" and "I wasn't alive at that time" that you somehow knew better than me? You didn't know that Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth until I brought up this discussion after all, what's your point whether I was alive at that time or not? You were fooled by Western media into believing the Tiananmen Square Massacre myth after all, yet you look down on me because I was born late? You really never said anything nice to me, then why should I be nice to you? All this time, you've been looking down on me, then why should I look up to you? I'm the one literally educating you that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, yet you look down on me for being born late. China has lifted 700 million people out of poverty by international standards in just 40 years, whereas the whole rest of the world only lifted 150 million by comparison. Video: Historical achievement: Take 700 million out of poverty youtu.be/CljWffPgmG8 "China has lifted 728 million people out of poverty by international standards. The whole rest of the world has only lifted 152 million." - John Ross, Well-known columnist in UK, Former Deputy mayor of London.
    1
  26707.  Anonymous Panacea  About cemeteries in Xinjiang, the old Uighur burial grounds were crumbling and deteriorating, so the government exhumed those graves and transfer them to newly-constructed cemeteries elsewhere. But the Western media deliberately frame it as destruction of graves, but if you follow the story, it's not true that the graves are gone. For example, a cemetery in Xayar, NW China's Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, has recently become a bone of international contention. CNN reported that graveyards in the region were being demolished by authorities, highlighting stories such as that of Aziz Isa Elkun, a Uygur poet now residing in London, who had said he couldn't find his father's grave on Google Maps. So a crew from CGTN decided to find out if there was any truth to the CNN report. Video: By following CNN , we find how they make fake news about Xinjiang youtu.be/pXBIeKpUq_c
    1
  26708.  Anonymous Panacea  "神州 Shenzhou We got witness accounts" Yes and some witness stories were fabricated. Like Aziz Isa Elkun, a Uygur poet now residing in London, who had said he couldn't find his father's grave on Google Maps, but his story has long been debunked Video: By following CNN , we find how they make fake news about Xinjiang youtu.be/pXBIeKpUq_c
    1
  26709.  @abbotsful  In all our discussions, you have never been nice to me, you constantly make quips about me being "a group of communist party propagandists" sharing one 神州 Shenzhou account on YouTube. Lately, you even made the comment on another thread that I have a "file of China's achievements to throw at Laowai" then why should I be nice to you? Your actions dictate that you are clearly are no friend of mine and neither do you consider my views worth discussing at all, then why should I try to be nice to you? I believe in drawing information from as many sources as possible. You have admitted that you were previously duped by Western media into thinking there was a Massacre inside Tiananmen Square, even though reports have shown there there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square. I mean, I literally opened your eyes to this knowledge and you actually owe me, yet you constantly look down on me for being born late, as if being born earlier somehow put you at at advantage. For what reason should I be nice to you then? You mentioned previously that you "kind of wish you'd never gotten into this, that you'd never commented on a video before HK 2019." but didn't commenting helped you improve your understanding and expand your knowledge? You would have continued blindly believing Western anti-China propaganda had you not commented after HK 2019 and been exposed to different viewpoints.
    1
  26710.  @abbotsful  Let's make it clear, you can't force people to be nice to you. I see no reason why I should be nice to people, who've looked down on my views, implying as if my 神州 Shenzhou account is used by multiple communist party propagandists or that I have a whole "file of China's achievements to throw at Laowai". Or look down at others for "being born late". I mean, what are these if not personal attacks against me for my views? I really don't feel obliged to treat someone nice, who hasn't been treating me nice. Don't you know Confucius' golden rule? "Do not unto others, what you don't want done onto yourself."
    1
  26711.  @神奇方舱  你以为我说中国好是为了狗粮吗？狗粮对我有什么用？给你吃啊？
    1
  26712.  @神奇方舱  看来狗粮最适合你。
    1
  26713. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  26714. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  26715.  @neilhallam8028  China's so-called "ghost cities" are gradually being filled up, as millions of people migrate from the rural countryside to the urban centers. For example, on YouTube there's a video (by Yes Theory) visiting China's "failed $1 billion copy of Paris" but if you watch till the end, there are people living in the city just fine.
    1
  26716.  @neilhallam8028  Every year in China over 50 million people migrate from the rural countryside to the towns and cities every year, and over time those empty cities will get filled up. For example, Kangbashi in Ordos, Inner Mongolia, was once filled with newly built but vacant apartment buildings. But according to the 2020 census, Ordo's Kangbashi District was home to 366,779 inhabitants. All that's needed is time.
    1
  26717. ​ @neilhallam8028  China's surveyed urban unemployment rate stood at 5% in November 2023, which is unchanged from the previous two months. Like I've mentioned many times before, those cities are being filled up. Apart from Ordo's Kangbashi, another city, Zhengdong New Area (郑东新区) had been considered by foreign media to be a ghost city throughout its early years, but its rapid growth in population and commercial occupants throughout the 2010s has led to outlets to no longer consider it as such. As of 2015, the new area's population totals 1,150,000, according to its government.
    1
  26718.  @Andy-P  You said: "All that investment in property which is now crashing." China's housing prices grew by 7.4% year-on-year in Nov 2023, following an increase of 7.5% YoY in the previous month, according to CEIC Data. Even Reuters has acknowledged the climb in China's new home prices after the government took certain measures.
    1
  26719.  @s._3560  What about those asymptomatic cases (meaning you don't display any obvious symptoms despite contracting the virus) so you might think you're fine and go out and infect others unknowingly?
    1
  26720.  CCP lied and the World died  The US aircraft carrier spent months at sea, so how did they contract Covid-19 then? And the brave captain was dismissed for notifying US government of virus infection. Video: U.S. Navy fires captain who sought help for virus-stricken ship youtu.be/Im18TI4uuWQ
    1
  26721.  CCP lied and the World died  Why was US captain dismissed for informing the US government of the virus infection on board? Video: Sailors cheer Navy captain removed for coronavirus warning youtu.be/0OT3cprphUk
    1
  26722. At least the Chinese general spoke in Chinese language. But Marcos Jr speak in the language of Philippines former colonial masters.
    1
  26723.  @mathewg5884  It just goes to show that Filipinos regard Anglo-Saxon culture as inherently superior instead of speaking their own native language, like the Chinese general did.
    1
  26724.  @Todd-rk2lb  Because you don't understand Chinese.
    1
  26725.  @Todd-rk2lb  用中文字写。
    1
  26726.  @paradoxine6287  I think that as President of the Philippines, he should be speaking in his own native language, leaving it up to the interpreters to translate his message, instead of speaking the language of his former colonial masters. Chinese leaders use Chinese, Russian leaders use Russian, same for India and many other countries. But the colonial mentality still persists within many Filipinos like you said.
    1
  26727. ​ @paradoxine6287  "Why would you speak Chinese in a room filled with non-Chinese speakers" In my opinion, speakers should speak in a language that's most comfortable to them, in order to properly convey the meaning behind the words, and leave it for the interpreters to properly decipher the message. Otherwise, some nuance is lost when the speaker uses the language of another. As I've stated, China does it, so does Russia, India, etc.
    1
  26728.  @paradoxine6287  "Shenzhou. But at the end of the day, it is not a sign of colonial mentality, mind you." It is. Colonial mentality is the internalized perception of ethnic or cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of colonization. Such people display a preference for Anglo-Saxon culture over any "non-white" culture, including their own.
    1
  26729.  @paradoxine6287  "Marcos spoke in English because he was most comfortable with it. But doesn't mean weak cultural values (colonial mentality)." It shows that the Philippine president does his thinking with a foreign language, rather than his own native language, and it doesn't portray a sense of strong Filipino cultural values. How do Russians feel when their President addresses them in Russian language? How do Indians feel when their PM addresses them in his own native tongue? As for China, I can tell you that Chinese feel proud when our leader speaks in Mandarin (as it should be). Speaking in your own language conveys a sense of pride and strong cultural identity, especially when it's the leader of a country speaking.
    1
  26730.  @MarkYeung1  While the Chinese government certainly isn't perfect (there's no such thing as a perfect government) it is certainly doing everything it can to transform China from a once dirt-poor, war-torn, into the world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made-in-China), having the world's 2nd largest R&D spending, protected by the world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by the world's 2nd largest military spending. As China rises in the world, the perception and standing of Chinese (and other Asians like Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese, etc) will rise as well. However, if China is demonized, then all Asians (including non-Chinese) suffer from a negative perception regardless.
    1
  26731.  @MarkYeung1  Despite China's having the world's largest land army, China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. If anything, it looks like the United States is a threat to global peace and stability here.
    1
  26732.  @MarkYeung1  China is demonised of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West. Since the 19th century, many have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many Westerners to fathom. That's why China is demonized and this negative perception affects the standing of Asians in the West.
    1
  26733.  @MarkYeung1  China is doing exactly that, by showing that even a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China can someday surpass the United States in the foreseeable future. But it's those people who suffer from subservient "colonial mindset" that blindly think that every country should become Western democracy. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  26734.  @cedricdellafaille1361  You said: "the reason why taiwan leads in technology is because they are not constraint with rules and listen like a robot without any questioning," Mainland China leads Taiwan in various technology such as smartphones, drones, mobile payment, 5G, highspeed railway networks, Artificial Intelligence, self-driving cars, robotics and automation, yet you're claiming that Taiwan leads in technology?
    1
  26735.  @shway1  Cyrus Janssen merely stated the incompatible work cultures between Americans and Taiwanese. Some developed Asian nations such as Singapore and South Korea work long hours as well, so it's more a matter of different work cultures between the East and the West. "americans work long hours compared to peer nations" That's true. However, if the comparison is between USA and Taiwan island (as in the case of this video) then Americans do not have as long working hours (on average) as Taiwanese. If you consider the work culture toxic, then TMSC might just decide to relocate elsewhere, to a country with a more compatible work culture.
    1
  26736.  @MarkYeung1  The thing is that earlier you said: "Many Chinese people living out of mainland are optimistic too." but you yourself aren't optimistic, it's as though you inherently want Evergrande not to succeed and to fail since almost all your statements seems to indicate your pessimism.
    1
  26737.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou I am optimist by nature." So far in our conservations, you've haven't appeared to shown any of that optimism you claim to have, you appear to constantly take negative views of events that happen in China. Whenever I bring up positive news about Evergrande, you just dismiss it, then you're certainly not an optimist by nature.
    1
  26738.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou Not only am I an optimist, I did well in the stock market this year by avoiding China." Last year, China actually overtake the USA as the world's largest recipient of foreign investment according to U.N figures. The Chinese economy brought in 163 billion dollars in investment compareds to the 134 billion attracted by the United States. Video: China overtakes US as top country for foreign investment | DW News youtu.be/o-VHewwSz3A So apparently, many foreign investors are investing in China, even if you yourself apparently don't.
    1
  26739.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou I am optimistic that the winter Olympics will do well." Yes, it turns out that even though the Biden Administration said they were going to boycott the 2022 Beijing Olympics diplomatically, USA has flip-flopped on their decision, and has applied for 18 officials to attend the Olympics in Beijing. Video: US applies for 18 officials to attend Beijing Olympics despite boycott announcement youtu.be/Vg3WyImPe7w I feel bad for U.S allies like Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand who followed Joe Biden's call to diplomatically boycott the Beijing Olympics, yet now it has been revealed that USA themselves don't uphold their boycott. It's clear that USA is taking it's allies for a ride, and your countries just blindly follow what the USA claims to do, and the USA just back out in the end.
    1
  26740.  @MarkYeung1  "It's clear that you're optimistic about everything in China and pessimistic about everything outside China." Honestly speaking, The Omicron variant is devastating the rest of the world, while China maintains our Zero Covid policy, prioritizing the protection of people's lives. China's response to Covid19 is to sacrifice businesses to save lives, whereas say the U.S response is to sacrifice lives to save businesses.
    1
  26741.  @geoeconomics3067  No EurAsian challenger? So if someday in the future, if an African superpower or South American superpower emerges to challenge EurAsian, then they are permitted to do so right? Or do Westerners consider the notion of an African/South American superpower absurd and don't even bother to factor it into their plans?
    1
  26742.  @geoeconomics3067  Guess what, China's Belt and Road Initiative runs through EurAsia. USA can't even afford to compete with China on the Belt and Road Initiative front, the best they can do is invest money in anti-China propaganda to discourage countries from participating in BRI.
    1
  26743.  @geoeconomics3067  So what is the USA's answer to the Belt and Road Initiative? The USA lacks a comprehensive plan to deal with China's rise, they have nothing to compare with the BRI project that's going through EurAsian landmass. Didn't you say earlier that whoever controls EurAsian landmass controls the world? China has BRI, but USA has nothing.
    1
  26744.  @lakvenk6554  The CEOs of Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple were asked by lawmakers if they believed China steals technology from US companies. 3 out of 4 answered: "No, I have no instance of China stealing our technology." Only Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook said yes. Video: Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple respond to Congress about whether China steals US technology youtu.be/v6whxZm1ubQ
    1
  26745. United State's logic: "Number 1: Those Ukraine bio-labs simply do not exist! Period!" "Number 2: Those non-existent labs are for peaceful civilian use, certainly not for military purpose!" "Number 3: If those non-existent civilian labs fall in to Russian hands, they will use the data to develop military bio-weapons to use in false flag operations! No doubt about it!"
    1
  26746. Actually, there's a Chinese saying: 世上没有从天而降的英雄，只有挺身而出的凡人。 There are no heroes who fall from the sky, only mortals who come forward. Which means that "We can't depend on God sending a hero from the sky to save people, it's up to ordinary people to step forth and save lives."
    1
  26747. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  26748. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  26749. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  26750. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了，而且西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见。
    1
  26751. China was once democratic when Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew Qing dynasty and established Republic of China. It lasted for 38 years (1912-49) but during this messy period, China was not unified. Tibet broke away from China, and many warlords ruled over individual provinces of China. Sun tried get assistance from the Western powers, but they mocked China for attempting to copy their governing system. China was part of Allies during WW1, but Westerners gave away Chinese Shandong Province (which Germans captured) to Japan, instead returning it to China. Dr Sun died before he could realize a unified China. Next China tried communism, and under Mao Zedong China was finally unified under People's Republic of China, which the previous ROC administration failed to achieve. Mao managed to expel foreign influence from China, but while he was brilliant strategist able to seize control of China over KMT, he was also a poor governor. His policies led China to economic disaster, and he even made self-criticism, and stepped down as state chairman after failure of Great Leap Forward. So Deng Xiaoping stepped forward, and introduce capitalist reforms in 1970s since the communist market just wasn't working out, and thanks to his reforms, China has opened up to the Western markets, and modernized. According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012. Literacy rate of China increased from 65.5 % in 1982 to 96.4 % in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. Things finally looking up as China modernizes itself under CPC leadership and this is the same party that governed China previously in "Red Communism" China. Today, President Xi Jinping is leading China, and the government follows what's been described as socialism with Chinese characteristics. Today China is world's 2nd largest economy in, with strong land army PLA to deter Britain and Japan from invasion like they did in the path, as well as having big presence in global political stage and potential rival to USA. China also has Belt and Road Initiative that plans to expand economic development to Europe and all the states in between Europe and China. As you can see, it was not easy for China to arrive at where we are today. China was democratic once, but it didn't work out well, and while communism unified the country, our economy suffered. So now China is pursuing our own governing system our own way that is suited for China. Most Westerners are still "stuck" in the "Red Communist China" when most Chinese have long since moved on from that phase. As long as the current government can continue to create economic growth, Chinese people see little need to drastically change the system as it is.
    1
  26752. +Peter Bryne What makes you think Mao is not great strategist? He turned the communist party of China, from small group of only 50 members in the beginning of 1921, into the ruling party of People's Republic of China in 1949, going against initially superior numbers of the KMT, the Japanese and other foreign powers. How is this not considered brilliant strategy by anyone's measures? Even Western scholars have acknowledged his strategies such as the Long March. Are you sure you have read a fair amount on this subject? Do you think it was all attributed to luck? Just because self criticism is communist trait, so it automatically means its wrong to do so? At least Chinese leaders have reflected on past mistakes and make the effort to learn from it. But what about in USA, when President Bush invaded Iraq on suspicion of harboring WMD, only to find out that there weren't any WMD? Where is the "self-criticism" for Bush to reflect on that unnecessary invasion? He only did that because Americans were angry over 9/11 bombing, and that they needed something for them to vent their frustrations out against, which is why USA invaded Iraq. The West actually opposed China's entry in to the World Trade Organization. According the following source, China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate it as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because United States, European countries, and Japan requested that China first reform various tariff policies, including tariff reductions, open markets and industrial policies. The United States imposed additional conditions on China, and when China joined the WTO, it agreed to considerably harsher conditions than other developing countries China and the World Trade Organization en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_and_the_World_Trade_Organization Those poverty figures were obtained from the World Bank, not from CPC, so are you implying that the World Bank is wrong in its assessment of China? The literacy rate in China also obtained from UNESCO, so why are you claiming that the data is from CPC? Exactly what do you even know about China's education system? As of 2013, China is the most popular country in Asia for international students and ranks 3rd in overall among countries. China's education ranks third among countries that host the most international students, usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/2013/10/08/explore-the-worlds-top-universities Like I said, it is clear that most Westerners like you are still "stuck" in this "Red Communism" China mindset, whereas many Chinese people and the government have long since moved beyond this period and put it behind us. Also, why do foreigners like you care what happens to people in China? Those things happen to Chinese people, and if Chinese people can forgive the government, then why should foreigner like you make noise? There so many crimes and atrocities committed in the world by people on another ethnic race, such as Rape of Nanjing and Unit 731 by Japanese soldiers, as well as European people genocide of American native people, occupying their lands and importing slaves from Africa, so why single out what Chinese people did to Chinese here? People like you have obviously been poisoned by Western media, and just regurgitate same old biased viewpoints. In China, organ harvesting used to be conducted on deathrow prisoners with their or their relatives permission(and of course, they are taken only after execution) and they are donated to families of the deceased, but this process is also being phased out by the government. The Sanlu milk powder scandal affected everyone in China as well as in rest of the world, but the culprit has been arrested and government has been taking measures to improve safety standards to ensure such things do not happen again. And what's this about fisherman refusing to rescue drowning students all about? That is not related to the government, and China is vast country so you can't label all Chinese people like that. Besides, if they let the student drown, what makes you think that the fisherman is able to find the "bodies" afterwards? You are just spreading malicious lies without much basis behind them. The government that governed China during "Red China" period, is still the same government that lifted 600 million people out of poverty in 30 years. Just for comparison, the entire population of the continent of Africa is about 1.2 billion people. So in effect, the Chinese government lifted a number of people equal to half of Africa's entire population out of poverty in decades, compared to what Western powers have done in Africa for centuries. This phenomena has been quoted as being "unprecedented" in human history, even by Western scholars, and many people believe such an astonishing is unlikely to be repeated again elsewhere by other countries, especially in such short duration.
    1
  26753. +Peter Byrne You think every war strategy has to be about attacking the enemy all the time? The Communist party was initially heavily outnumbered by KMT forces and it is this Long March retreat, that enabled the communists to bide their time and survive while waiting for opportunity to strike back. You clearly haven't read Sun Zi's "The Art of War" to know how to fight numerically superior opponent with smaller numbers. It was thanks to Long March that CCP was able to survive the odds against KMT and eventually won in the end, that's why it is called good strategy, not simply because it is a retreat alone. According to your source, again it demonstrates the tactics used by communist party, from being on the verge of extinction by KMT, to seizing complete control over China. The CCP were numerically inferior to KMT and Japanese forces, so of course they can't engage the enemy directly and resorted to guerilla warfare and sabotage mission instead, and relied on KMT and Japanese to wear each other down. That course of action is still a demonstration of good strategy in any real warfare textbook. You are constantly framing this issue in "moral" point of view, but not in a "strategic" point of view. Otherwise, how could CCP hope to defeat the numerically superior KMT and Japanese forces. You think "morality" alone is enough to justify KMT's reasons for figthing? The source claims that KMT were busy uniting the country, but it still failed, because China was adminstered by KMT from 1912-1949 (38 years) but they still failed to unify a divided China. Tibet was not part of China during this period and many regions ruled by warlords and the Japanese were also invading China. Also, remember that Chinese Civil War was actually started by KMT during Shanghai massacre of 12 April 1927, when 5,000-10,000 communists were purged. So exactly how is KMT considered "unifying" China here? In war, there is no such thing as right or wrong, and in the end, whoever gains control of China is the true victor, and nobody expected the communist party to be able to defeat KMT and claim all of China. That is why I said Mao is good strategist here, because his actions eventually led CCP to triumph over its adversaries. As for self-criticism, I don't understand why you think the the government hasn't admitted their mistake during Great Leap Forward and so on. According to Baidu (Chinese version of Wikipedia) it is explicitly stated that the Chinese government regards Great Leap Forward as unprecedented economic catastrophe, and that the government is also taking actions to correct this problem. There is even estimated death toll of 21.58 million Chinese people. So what is wrong with "self-criticism" here? At least it is still an admission of some sort. Baidu: Great Leap Forward (in Chinese) baike.baidu.com/item/大跃进 Baidu: Great Leap Forward (Translated) translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fbaike.baidu.com%2Fitem%2F%25E5%25A4%25A7%25E8%25B7%2583%25E8%25BF%259B&edit-text=&act=url The communist government has learn harsh lessons from these mistakes and long since moved on without following the path of Marxism/Maoism, but can you say the same thing for USA and its invasion of Iraq? Even when after Bush, and after no WMD were found after invading Iraq, America still continued to engage in wars in the Middle East, such as in Afghanistan and Libya. Who is the government here that hasn't learnt from its mistakes? Because US has two-party system, they can easily blame the opposing party for all of America's faults. But in China's government, both the good things and bad things are attributed to the communist party all the time, and the communist party that maintains China's economic growth today is the same government that ruled China during Maoist period. Even if you keep on dismissing all statistics from World Bank or UNESCO as being from CPC, then what about the article claiming China is 3rd most popular destination for international students? Those statistics are derived from the number of students that choose to study abroad in China, so isn't this a reliable indication of progress of China's education system? Since it is the best in the region according to that article, that means that more international students visit Chinese universities, than they do for Japanese universities or S. Korean universities. So why are you still acting like every statistic out of China is faked? The government of China has made it very clear that China is NOT exporting our form of governance to other countries, so why do you still complain about China meddling in your affairs and trying to promote our ideology? What about USA traveling halfway across the world to spread its ideology in Vietnam, Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan and other parts of Asia and Middle East? Which country is the one actively promoting its ideology even till today, to the point that it is willing to go to war with other countries? China does not believe in spreading our ideology, unlike Soviet Russia, or USA with democracy. You think Falun Gong is good? Why? Are you a member of it then? Otherwise, what business is Falun gong to you when you only heard one side of the story? Just like "live" organ harvesting here, what makes you automatically assume that the organs are even taken "live" at all? It is clearly made up by Falun gong to demonize the government, by its phrasing. Also, you mentioned that China has 50,000-80,000 people just suddenly go missing EVERY year unreported? So in the last 5 years alone, 250,000-400,000 people have all varnished? That's almost quarter to half of million people missing just like that. And Chinese people don't know anything about it? China Uncensored is not the most trustworthy source for reliable news about China and most of it is just funded propaganda meant to criticize China's government and conceal China's progress. Why don't you come to China yourself and see what its like instead of watching online videos only? Here is fun 2 minute video about the nightview of 11 cities in China. Beautiful Night View of China 2016 (11 cities in 2 minutes) youtube.com/watch?v=G7ZRa-w9xyA
    1
  26754. +Peter Byrne My motivation was that China has tried various political systems before, including democracy, but it failed to work out for China. China has also tried communism, and while it worked to unify China, where previous administration failed, it did not help our economy, so the government changed. China today is no longer Marxist, but neither is it fully democratic and our economy been described as more capitalist than some Western countries. Today China follows "socialism" with Chinese characteristics, so why can't China follow our own path different from the West? Must all countries adopt Western democracy to be successful? No, and China is living proof of that. Exactly what do you even know about strategy? In strategy, the ends justify the means, and you have to cunning and sneaky to win. CPC had numerically inferior numbers, and had CPC fought the Japanese directly, they would have failed and be completely wiped out. How is your approach considered strategy at all? Like I said, you frame "morality and righteousness" over real "strategy". You call Long March a "retreat," but still it is a move that enabled CCP to survive to eventually defeat KMT in 1949. That is real strategy, not the "righteous" point of view you are trying to impose here. Are you sure you even read "The Art of War" by Sun Zi (both Sun Zi and Sun Tzu are acceptable) at all? One of the chapters mentions the use of deception in warfare. Quoted and translated, it is "The strong must appear weak and the weak must appear strong" and Mao has demonstrated this ability a few times. Even looking at Mao Zedong's Wikipedia page en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mao_Zedong you can find the word "strategy" mentioned number of times, so why are you keep on denying that Mao Zedong is a strategist here? Those "uprisings" were conducted against the other provincial warlords like the Zhili clique and so on, and not directly against the KMT. Jiang Jieshi initiated an unprovoked purge of Communist parties within the KMT, and that is known to be the starting point of the Chinese Civil war. Virtually every textbook defines KMT's purging of communist as the beginnings of the Chinese Civil war here. It should also be noted that KMT was unpopular among Chinese peasants and heavily corrupted during Chinese Civil War, having hoarded material, armament and military-aid funding. President Truman even made comment saying "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves" after pocketing almost $750 million in US aid. Under Chinese laws, the government reserves the right to censor information, so what's wrong with this? If Cambridge wants to publish books and articles on Chinese lands, then of course they will be subject to Chinese laws here. Also, what has your fisherman not rescuing students got to do with Chinese government or Chinese people? In your source, Chinese people themselves expressed outrage, and the fisherman is not "communist party agent" or anything, so what has it got to do with this issue at all? Does that lone fisherman represent all of China, its people and our government? My Baidu link to Great Leap Forward, shows you that Chinese people are aware of it, and that the party has made a self-criticism of the GLF and made amends to rectify its effects. If China was truly that censored, then why not cover up GLF in the first place and deny its death toll altogether? All your source seems to come from China Uncensored, so what makes you think that it is reliable, when you quote it as your source? Haven't you ever notice that hardly any news media, both Western or Chinese, ever talks about your so-called "live" organ harvesting? Only China Uncensored seems interested in propagating the rumors, so what makes you think that organ harvesting continues even till today? If it was such a bother for foreigner like you, then why don't President Trump approach President Xi Jinping to talk about supposed "live" organ harvesting? Why doesn't Angela Merkel or other European leader approach China to talk about this issue? Because there is still insufficient proof altogether. You mean some figures are able to enough prove that such things are being carried out on daily basis? Why doesn't rest of the world even care about this atrocities at all? Since you been to China, then you know that all those wonders were achieved under the communist party, which is the same party that led China through Red Communist China. Building modern China was not easy process, and it was built upon the sweat and blood, tears and sacrifice of Chinese people to turn a war-torn, poor and starving country, into the economic powerhouse and potential rival to USA. Along the way, there are bound to be mistakes and failures, and only by trial and error, did Chinese government managed to become what it is today. Every country deserves its own shot at success, so why can't Chinese government follow our own path to success by ourselves? Here is another beautify video capturing various viewpoints of China by a foreigner. It has almost everything good and bad about China, from mountains and deserts, ancient monuments to modernization, from coal plants and oil rigs to wind and solar energy, from ghost cities to megacities, from destruction to construction. It can be considered the face of truth about what China really is, all in just 4 minutes. China From Above by Stef Hoffer youtube.com/watch?v=p1e68fqMkME
    1
  26755. +Peter Byrne Neither does your motivation explain exactly why you are here. You think communism is evil and CCP is interfering in your affairs and trying promote it's ideology outside China. Then what about USA spreading democracy across the Pacific Ocean into Asia? Isn't that spreading ideology as well? As for CPC spreading communism, those "communist" apps are only available to Chinese citizens. And the Cambridge article only applies to the government censoring information of China Quarterly within China. So exactly how do these points align with you motivation that CPC is trying promote its ideology outside China? President Trump's election has also spawned numerous political apps in America. According to following source, more than 60 mobile apps on politics have been created due to Trump becoming President of USA. usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2017/02/21/political-apps-all-rage-trump-era/98063488/ So what is wrong with Chinese government promoting "communist" apps in Chinese phones? If you watch your own source carefully, it says those apps are available, but does that mean every Chinese person has to make use of those apps? It says "*If* you wanna brush up on knowledge of Marxist, ... ... If you wanna singalong to communist songs.... If you wanna hear retellings of Long March... If you want to virtually sweep tombs..." so what is wrong with these apps? Nobody is forcing Chinese citizens to make use of them if they don't want to. Why are you suddenly drawing attention Stalin here? What has Stalin's strategies got to do with Mao here? Stalin performed wave attacks because he had numerically superior troops, but the communist party did not had such numbers. You are switching the topic about just to confuse me here by introducing other concepts here. Like I said, in strategy, as long as you achieve your objective, which for CCP is control over China, then isn't that strategy considered successful? After all, CCP is the one in control of mainland China, not KMT. You obviously have not read the real "Art of War", if you think a general can win by not being "underhanded." You are imposing your own Western Ideals of "righteousness" here. According to Sun Zi, All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near. What has Geneva Convention suddenly got to do with war strategy now? I'm sure you at least heard of Western saying: "All's fair in love and war" which means whatever soldiers in wartime are not bound by the rules of fair play. Spies, torture, lying, backstabbing, making deals with enemies, selling out allies, bombing civilians, wounding instead of killing, and so on are "fair game" in the sense that by taking these options off of the table you are only "limiting" yourself: Your opponent has no reason to comply to your moral standards. Even if you really never read "Art of War" this phrase should at least be familiar to you. There were few thousands communists that escaped from KMT, but after the Yan'An rectification movement, the CCP's numbers swelled, from less than 10,000 troops after Long March, to nearly 2.8 million members according to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yan'an_Rectification_Movement#Background What makes you think that tens of thousands of patriotic youth were persecuted? The CCP were short of numbers against KMT, so why persecute those people who have come to join the CCP? How do you expect CCP to achieve a strength of over 2.8 million at the end of the movement, by persecuting tens of thousands of people? Every person recruited by the party during this period was too valuable to waste, therefore it is extremely unlikely that persecutions in such larges numbers ever happened. Regarding fisherman story, if CCP really destroyed Chinese "morality" like you claim, then why are there Chinese people outraged by the fisherman's actions in your source? If the CPC promote capitalism, then why did the teens risk their lives to rescue the children? You are obviously being biased here, and just associating every "bad trait" to the CCP, even when your "link" to them, is shaky. You think every Chinese person's actions are controlled by the government is that it? Once again, it all boils down to lack of evidence to back up your claims of "live" organ harvesting. You claim you have evidence of doctors involved defecting, recordings of hospital staff, then why don't confront China on these issues directly? You claim you have the "evidence" of live organ harvesting, but do not want to reveal it to the world? You claim to have witness a petition, but what has it achieved? Ultimately, whether real or imagined, this is internal affair within China, so what business is it of yours? Even looking at your wording, you said "live" harvesting right? That means while the person is still alive? Whatever is the benefit to harvesting organs "live" at all? Realistically, nobody does that, and what's the point of "terrorizing" people by live organ harvesting, when it is all supposedly hushed up? Have you actually stopped to think carefully about this rumor that you keep on propagating because of "news" you heard? If you claim CCP didn't brought success to China, and imply that "any other government" could have achieved what CCP did, then why not compare China to world's largest democracy, India. India has world's 2nd largest population after China, therefore, the 2nd largest workforce. Indian workers tend to speak English, whereas many Chinese workers still struggle with English, and India is democratic, while China is communist. Republic of India was founded in 1947, two years before People's Republic of China was founded in 1949. Yet in the last 30 years, China has surpassed India in many aspects. So no, I don't think China would have managed such level of success without CCP's help. Its easy to simply claim that "another government could have done it better" in hindsight, but in reality, hindsight is 50/50 Regarding censorship in China, while it true that access to Western websites like Youtube, Facebook, etc, are blocked, you can still use VPN to access Western websites. Many MNCs and foreign trade enterprises in China operate using Western websites, so they are granted special VPN licenses while in China. But of course they are subject to Chinese internet rules while operating in China. It is clear that perhaps you are still "stuck" in Red Communist China, when many Chinese people have long since moved on from that turbulent time. In this next video, instead of aerial view, it is time-lapsed street view of 3 modern Chinese cities. It starts off slow, but after 1 minute it shows these cities modernization while retaining some Chinese cultural heritage sites. Throughout the video you can observe the many foreign brands and companies in China and that most of them operate their own VPN in order to access Western websites. It also has more of the beautiful and colourful Chinese night life, seen this time from the point of view of someone on the street. Amazing China! (Guangzhou, Shanghai, Shenzhen) youtube.com/watch?v=RSgdUVxNrbM All these previous videos are all non-political in nature, and not trying force a message down your throat or anything. Whenever possible, I take these from foreigner point of view of China, and the images depict China as they see it. Its a pity that you will only probably visit China only after CCP is gone, because from many people's views, the CCP is likely here to stay for long while.
    1
  26756. +Peter Byrne You are welcome to disagree about "Art of War" if you want, but it should be known that Art of War originated in 500 BC so its written about 2500 years ago and corresponded to a different time altogether. But it is still being taught at major military academies worldwide, including United States Military Intelligence personnel. UN veto is probably what makes keeps the UNSC "paralyzed" and unable to function effectively. China and Russia may have vetoed against USA, but similarly USA has also vetoed against our countries. But it should at least be noted that out of the 5 UNSC permanent members, China vetos the least number of times at only 11 whereas USA and Russia hold the most at 79 and 106 at this moment in time (2017) United Nations Security Council veto power en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_veto_power#Most_common_users With regards to organ harvesting, there is an international panel of experts that have debunked such rumors according to the following source, claiming that the allegations that 60,000 to 100,000 organ transplants are performed in China each year using organs from so called "prisoners of conscience," are ridiculous Spotlight: Experts slam rumors of organ harvesting in China news.xinhuanet.com/english/2016-08/20/c_135617600.htm Although the above source is from Chinese media, the panel of experts are from international organizations such as -Francis Delmonico, former president of the Transplantation Society and professor of Harvard Medical School at the Massachusetts General Hospital -Michael Millis, professor of Surgery and chief of the Section of Transplantation of the University of Chicago Hospitals -José Nuñez, medical officer in charge of global organ transplantation at the World Health Organization. Nuñez also remarked that 60,000 and 100,000 organ transplants are equal to the transplant activity of the entire world and is practically impossible. For example, in 2015 there is estimated total of 120,000 organ transplants occurring world wide. Estimated number of organ transplantations worldwide in 2015 (total: 126,670) statista.com/statistics/398645/global-estimation-of-organ-transplantations/ For religion in China, China has had many religions coexisting relatively peacefully with each other, with Taoism, Buddhism, Confucianism (not really a religion, more like set of principles) as well as Islam and Christianity. However, there never been any Crusade, Holy wars or Jihad throughout Chinese history. Judaism is forms quite minor part of Chinese history, but because both of us share many similar values, such as respect for family and elders, resulting in harmonious coexistence. Both of us also value specific character traits, like thriftiness, cunning and having a knack for business. For example, Jews are known to be thrifty, calculative businessmen, very much the same way most people describe Chinese businessmen. It is this sharing of similar traits that makes us close. Ultimately though, China is atheist state, and puts the government above any religious organization. Therefore, religion should never be allowed to interfere with effective governance. Christianity and Islam are allowed in China, but there has to be clear distinction between politics and religion. But as long as there isn't interference, then you are free to practice whatever religion you want in China. Falun Gong has been described as a cult, hijacking traditional Chinese practices like Qigong. The government doesn't ban Qigong, because it is truly ancient tradition of China, with 4000 years history, and early morning in China you can find many people practicing real Qigong, not Falun Gong, which only existed since 1990s. That should already set off alarm bells that it is probably a cult. Here are some other people's point of view Scholars refute Falungong's organ rumor culteducation.com/group/1254-falun-gong/29725-scholars-refute-falungong-s-organ-rumor.html -Wimal Hewamanage, a senior lecturer on Pali and Buddhist studies at Sri Lanka's University of Colombo, said, "I've spent many years in China and have seen no evidence to suggest the Chinese government forces Falungong practitioners to donate organs." -"Absolutely, Falungong is one of the most destructive cults, which destroys human minds and physical health," said Alexander L. Dvorkin, a professor from St. Tikhon's Orthodox University in Moscow." Even in Holy city of Jerusalem, Falun Gong posters at the gates are taken down. culteducation.com/group/1254-falun-gong/27349-chinese-cult-illegally-takes-jerusalem-s-main-gate.html About strategy again, you can reject use of underhanded means to achieve victory, but then, you are only depriving yourself of an option, and your adversary has no reason not to use underhanded methods as necessary. Take for example, terrorists, who often use civilians in their causes. I am not justifying the cause of terrorists, but I am saying that their methods are effective, since the world's most powerful military, the USA, is still unable to defeat them and claim victory, even after 15 years of warfare. With Mao, I am comparing his strategy, which enabled the small Chinese communist party to grow to become governing party of world's most populous nation today. That is real strategy, that even neutral and objective Western scholars have acknowledged Mao as strategist, so I am not alone in my thinking here. China has long since progressed beyond Red Communism during Mao's era, and embrace capitalism today. Did you watch the Amazing China! (Guangzhou, Shanghai, Shenzhen) video I posted? Did you notice many foreign companies in China, and many of them have VPN license by government to access Western websites. Guangzhou is very colorful at night, and do the Chinese people look like they are being repressed... ... or celebrating China's modernization? I have another 4 minute video, this time about Beijing. Since you like more of the nature and culture aspect of China, then this video shows many of China's historical sites, and nature, like lakes, peach gardens, parks. It shows more of China's beautiful night life, and modern and futuristic architecture like CCTV Headquarters and Soho residences. It ends off with a virtual tour of Beijing, highlighting cultural sites and monuments in Forbidden City, as well as residential districts and backalleys. As always, for maximum immersion, watch this video in HD A Glance at Beijing https://youtu.be/-UuJxmU6OCQ
    1
  26757. +Peter Byrne If you want to create new and own religion or practice, then it is obvious that older existing religions will see yours as competition. Almost every child goes through elementary schools, because they form the fundamental basics, but not everyone goes to college. Gods and Demons are above human imposed notions of good and evil. For example, exactly what is a "righteous" god, and who says he won't resort to cunning? Even human cunning is no match for the true wits of a god. In short, they aren't bound by what humans consider good or evil. If you reject every Chinese source I quote, then what about the opinions offered by international experts in those sources? Francis Delmonico from Massachusetts General Hospital? Michael Millis from University of Chicago Hospitals? José Nuñez from WHO? Wimal Hewamanage from Sri Lanka's University of Colombo? Aren't these people also speaking up for China about supposed organ harvesting? Even in this next source, there is an international organ trafficking researcher from Australia (your country?) Campbell Fraser, who debunked that China uses cult practitioners’, prisoners’ organs Rumors debunked that China uses cult practitioners’, prisoners’ organs globaltimes.cn/content/1043057.shtml From above source, "A number of Western politicians, academics and lawyers have used Falun Gong for their political objectives against the Chinese government … Saying China had used prisoners' organs, is their way of claiming those executed were Falun Gong practitioners, and this is nonsense," said Fraser. I do agree that religions are really nothing more than tools of the state or whatever forces that spawned them. That is why the Chinese government is atheist and separates religion from politics. Also, who can truly separate what is "real" religion, from what isn't? Cults and terrorism hijack religions such as Islam and pose as "seemingly" real religions in order to recruit more people to their cause. Also, what makes you think Confucianism is destroyed along with the "others" in China? People in China still visit our ancestor's graves to pay respects and so on. This China travel guide websites travelchinaguide.com/intro/religion/ lists the same five religions (Taoism, Buddhism, Confucianism, Islam, Christianity) that are still present in China today, not "destroyed" like you said. I am not religious person, but I can assure you that all those "holy" prophets always have their own agenda. Jesus will tell you he is the only prophet of God (under Chrisitanity) but few years later, another prophet, Muhammad would come to tell you the same thing (under Islam). Ever since then, numerous people later have made similar claims and so on. I am sorry if I am being disrespectful but this is real phenomena that continues long after Jesus, Mohamad, etc. For example the Taiping Rebellion in 1850 was started because a man named Hong Xiuquan, who believed himself to be the younger brother of Jesus Christ. The Taiping Rebellion is often ranked among World's Top 10 wars by highest death toll. List of wars by death toll (of which Taiping Rebellion is usually among Top 10) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_by_death_toll Maybe I wasn't entirely correct in saying China didn't have Crusades or Holy wars, if Taiping Rebellion is to be counted as a type of holy war. With this is mind, it shows how dangerous some religions can be to Chinese society and that steps have to be taken to keep them in check. Who knows if this Falun Gong cult could have created another equally deadly civil war in China, drawing from China's experience with Taiping Rebellion? Falun Gong was created only in 1991 and had already grew to such immense prominence in China, that the communist party fears a possible repeat of the Taiping Rebellion. If you refuse to look at cult websites, then there's nothing more I can do here. You will have to judge for yourself whether Falun Gong is a cult for yourself then. Falun Gong has penetrated Israel I agree, but look at this article when they say they are attempting raise public awareness about the persecution of the practice in China. Why would a supposed "religion" suddenly want to involve itself in politics in China? That already sounds off warning bells to anyone who understands how cults are created. Falun Gong has a "political" aspect behind it, which qualifies it as a cult. If Christians were to go around telling others how Jerusalem is occupied by other religions, then wouldn't it qualify as a cult, due to the political aspect behind it? Falun Dafa in the Holy City of Jerusalem http://falunau.org/2017/10/falun-dafa-holy-city-jerusalem/ If Falun Gong truly wasn't a cult, then they wouldn't promote the fact that it is persecuted in China. They would simply teach their values and move on, instead of making other "sympathize" with them. Lastly, what has "Red Communism" got to do with Falun Gong persecution? How is Communism and Falun Gong even linked at all? For example, do you consider Vietnam a communist country too, since it is single party with communist doctrine still being taught? What about Falun Gong practitioners in Vietnam then? As for Jews in Kaifeng, I don't know what your media portrayed about the government clamping down on Jewish culture, but Western media is usually biased in portraying the Chinese government as anti-religious. They tend to omit important details and in this video below, we can see the response from people who interviewed Jews there. Chinese authorities clamp down on tiny Jewish community www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWDEpUY06xk From above source, the person Barnaby Yeh being interviewed posted a comment saying "You have mischaracterized my story, as have so many from the media. I wasn't forced to leave from a government edict. Instead, I left because someone within the community had made a report to the police regarding my activities. This is linked to the asylum case of one You Qing, currently residing illegally in the United States. Her family made a number of reports to the police which began the so-called "crackdowns" in the first place. It is absolutely frustrating that media outlets continue to omit this important detail. I did not denounce the central government's policy vis-a-vis religion. I merely stated that it was rational for the central government to be skeptical of religious activity, as it has been a vehicle to start uprisings in the past. Let us never forget the lessons of Falun Gong." It should also be noted that these "Jews" no longer seem interested in their ancient history and culture, and seem content in being labelled as Han Chinese. Many immigrants to countries have over the years, learn to adopt cultures of their host country and assimilate into the host culture. I do not know anything about UN Prayer room (Lucius) and its link to China's and Russia's veto. I see a room with a mosaic/mural at one wall, illuminated by cove lights, and a rectangular block of some stone-like material in the middle. I am glad you enjoyed my videos, despite it mostly being timelapse. If you dislike time-lapse and prefer to immerse yourself in the moment, then this breathtaking-view of Shanghai . Shanghai has changed much, and is now like futuristic city, with colorful lights and skyline that can rival other developed cities. Shanghai is world's most populous city, a global financial centre and transport hub, with the world's busiest container port. Be sure to watch in HD for maximum immersion. 'Shanghai' - LAOWA Aerial Footage youtube.com/watch?v=1cC-j4_NtvE
    1
  26758. +Peter Byrne You claim atheist have no understanding of heaven, then what makes you think Buddhist or Christians know any better? Heaven, God and Religion are all human constructs, so what makes you think you know "Heaven" any better than atheists? I asked you what you meant by "righteous" god and why you "think" he will not resort to cunning? Do Gods exist in your mind according to the way you're supposed to perceive them? Yin and Yang is NOT Buddhism, it is Taoism, and it is NOT equal to your Western notions of good and evil. Yin represents coldness, static, night, femininity, negative, and other aspects, whereas Yang represent heat, energy, masculinity, positive, and other aspects. But there is no real Good and Evil like you claim, and both forces need be present for balance. People like you fail to even see that you are being used for political purposes like what the Falun Gong cult is doing to you. If you really believe it as religion, then it should be about improving yourself, not about the political affairs of other countries. Qigong, Taoism, Buddhism and other orthodox religions don't involve politics now do they? Falun Gong is trying to gain your sympathies by concocting fake stories about organ harvesting, when I have already shown that international representatives in China have found no such evidence. Yet Falun Gong cult continues to propagate this rumor to gain sympathy from people like you. Exactly, nobody knew about Falun Gong, only until it spread out of China. But other Chinese religions and practices like Qigong, Taoism, Buddhism, etc, are well-known even outside of China, and they represent true Chinese traditions. So the only way Falun Gong cult can actually gain any distinction is by propagating this organ harvesting rumor. As for Vietnam, remember you are the one claiming Communism is against Falun Gong, when a communist country like Vietnam has Falun Gong, so what exactly is the link you are trying to make here? Every Communist country oppose Falun Gong is that what you trying say? I have heard of Holocaust but tell me if the "Jews" in China are getting political then? There is a family of Kaifeng Jewish descendants that formally converted to Judaism and accepted Israeli citizenship so what makes you think the Chinese government is against Jews all of a sudden? From a Village in China to the Wedding Canopy in Jerusalem israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/89436 I have already disclosed my motivation some time ago, perhaps you failed to read it? China is our own country, with rich culture and 5000 years history and we have tried various political systems before, including democracy, but it failed to work out. Even communism worked well initally, but not later, so the government changed it. Who says a governing system has to remain static all the time? Today's China follows the principles of Socialism with Chinese characteristics, and if it doesn't work, I am confident the Chinese government will change and adapt, as it did switching from communism to capitalism. On the other hand, your motivation makes little sense. You claim communism is evil, so is Vietnam evil because it is communist? What about Laos, who is also communist. You only target China because we have succeeded under communism, where it was expected to fail. 30 years ago, Nobody thought communist China would ever succeed or become global player, and after Soviet dissolution, many people expected PRC to follow suite. But we didn't and China grew become world's 2nd largest economy, with world's 2nd largest military expenditure, and PRC is very much involved in global politics today, than ever before. All of this goes against your own preconceived notions of Good and Evil regarding communism, which is why you constantly want to deride China and pick at its flaws constantly. Chinese government is not perfect, but we have succeed under its leadership, as shown in my various timelapse videos, so why should Chinese people suddenly get rid of the government? As long as the government can deliver peace, tranquility amd economic progress, it will continue to enjoy support from many Chinese people. If you want me to count the number of times I used "cult" then why do you refuse to look at Chinese media or Cult websites? You constantly dismiss my sources, so how else am I going to portray Falun Gong as a cult, if you continually ignore all my evidence? Cults are insidious and can fool people like you and me, if you are unable see past the facade and their true agenda. All this talk of good and evil only satisfy people like you who believe in them. The world is not black and white. Who is good and who is evil, and who gets to decide? You? If you claim God decides, then how would you know His judgement? The communist party has done bad things, but it has also done good things. According World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012, lifting 600 million people out of poverty in only 30 years. If that is not a good deed, then I don't know what is. Look at entire population of Africa, which is roughly 1.2 billion people for example. The Chinese government lifted a number of people equal to half of Africa's entire population out of poverty in decades, compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. This event has been termed "unprecedented" in human history, even by Western scholars, and many people believe that such phenomena unlikely to be repeated elsewhere, especially in such short duration. The Chinese government, while imperfect and making many mistakes in the beginning, has seemingly redeemed itself with this action alone, so why can't give us chance to pursue our own governance different from the West?
    1
  26759.  @zetristan4525  "Cyrus almost never does..." Well, because end of the day, Cyrus is an American citizen, not a Chinese citizen. There's nothing he can do to change China's government (that's up to Chinese ourselves to decide). But as an American citizen, there's plenty he can do to change his own country's government.
    1
  26760.  @billyehh  老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  26761.  @stephenhill8790  In America, the two parties are more interested in fighting each other rather than fighting for all of America's sake. The Republicans and the Democrats attempt to sabotage each other's policies, while blaming the other party for America's woes and claiming credit for America's successes. There is no driving need for reform, because frankly speaking both sides have been bought out by the rich U.S corporations.
    1
  26762.  @BD-lq4id  The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Source: Seventeen Point Agreement wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet.
    1
  26763.  @ID-8491  The Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) in 1951, thus affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Source: Seventeen Point Agreement wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement So there's this legally binding agreement signed by the Tibetans themselves acknowledging Chinese sovereignty over Tibet.
    1
  26764.  @ID-8491  The 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and a sellout to the Americans. The 14th Dalai Lama received funding from CIA to train Tibetan guerrillas in separatist activities against the Central People's Government (Beijing). We know this because declassified CIA files have exposed that a total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) So here we have concrete evidence that the 14th Dalai Lama received funding from the USA to engage in separatist activities against the Central People's Government.
    1
  26765.  @ID-8491  Source:https://wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Costs
    1
  26766. Trade war benefit no one, and President Trump just unilaterally slap tariffs on steel and aluminum, without even going through the proper WTO channels. Other countries affected by these tariffs are not going to be happy about it, and start launching a WTO investigation in retaliation.
    1
  26767. United we Stand President Trump just unilaterally slap tariffs on steel and aluminium in USA, without even going through the proper World Trade Organisation channels for such procedure here. This affects other people countries besides China, such as India, Japan, South Korea, etc, so much that some of these countries are retaliating by lodging complaints to the WTO to do an investigation into US's tariffs.
    1
  26768. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  26769.  @balsarmy  It's not just "technosphere" alone, it's also about infrastructure and poverty alleviation. According to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty. China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to 0.7% in 2015.
    1
  26770.  @YM-ay24S  "Obviously he means 45 degrees from the Horizon left to right i lived in china," How do you even know which part of the horizon is left to right? And which part of China did you lived in?
    1
  26771.  @anthonyjarvis9472  It depends on how much you decide to fork out for the product. What you pay is what you get, but China has both affordable products as well as high-end quality brands. For example, Chinese car brand BYD has already overtaken Tesla as the world's biggest seller of electric vehicles.
    1
  26772.  @anthonyjarvis9472  It depends on how much you decide to fork out for the product. What you pay is what you get, but China has both affordable products as well as high-end quality brands. For example, Chinese car brand BYD has already sold more electric vehicles than Tesla.
    1
  26773.  @cliftonortat513  Each Chinese city has its own specialty. There's this saying: To experience thousands of years of Chinese history, visit Xi'an. To experience hundreds of years of Chinese history, visit Beijing. To experience tens of years of Chinese history, visit Shanghai. To experience the future, visit Shenzhen.
    1
  26774.  @pbworld7858  Like Annalena "360 degrees" Baerbock lol.
    1
  26775. +Gaonnuri China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt, have long since faded to history. Throughout the passage of 5000 years, do you expect Chinese civilization to remain unchanged for thousands of years?
    1
  26776.  @wonderwang1585  So if you believe that all languages will eventually merge into one, which language is it? How do you know if the language you learn will be the last one standing? Isn't better to learn multiple languages to increase your chances?
    1
  26777.  @MarkYeung1  But the fact remains that Ukraine is not a member of Nato, then for what reason do Nato countries have to support it? Article 5 has not been activated in any way.
    1
  26778. NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM Mao Zedong was only human, and made mistakes like one. The government has long acknowledged Mao's disastrous policies and moved on since then. Back then, Mao Zedong even made a self-criticism after Great Leap Forward and stepped down from being state chairman after that.
    1
  26779. Taiwan wasn't even listed as a destination on Nancy Pelosi's trip to Asia and she had to sneak into the island in the middle of the night.
    1
  26780.  @nakim1200  Most likely. If the DPP separatists want to declare independence, then they should get off the Chinese territory of Taiwan and find some other plot of land to claim for themselves. Because Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26781. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26782.  @Carbuncle0168  Chiang kai Shek considered Taiwan as part of China, so if by independent country, you mean to say Taiwan is the country called China, then it still falls under the One China Policy that Taiwan is part of China, whichever way you look at it.
    1
  26783.  @junebug8485  I gave you the figures from Wikipedia: Chinese Civil War showing that after the Japanese surrendered in 1945, the KMT had a strength of 2 million (regular) + 2.3 million (militia) (June 1946) while the communists had a strength of 1.2 million (regular) + 2.6 million (militia) (July 1945). So clearly the KMT outnumbered the communists, whether you count regulars only, or together with the militias, yet despite this numerical superiority, the KMT still lost the mainland to the communists. So you've been saying that the peasants make up the majority of China's population, then why is it the so-called "democratic" KMT isn't able to harness the support of the majority of China's population? Indeed, the KMT pocketed some $750,000,000 dollars worth of U.S aid, so much that even then U.S President Harry S Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves". Then it just goes to show that the KMT were not competent enough to rule the mainland, while the communists right to rule China has been cemented.
    1
  26784.  @junebug8485  Chairman Mao Zedong did not murder those people, they starved to death because of the Great Chinese Famine which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvests and mass starvation. Even Mao himself couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And even if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    1
  26785.  @jinpxi4078  The U.S sending officials to Taiwan island is only to going to inflame tensions further, and eventually the people of Taiwan would realize that it's the U.S that's attempting to change the status quo with their continued visits, so they might reach a point where they no longer welcome the U.S visits because of the tensions raised with each visit.
    1
  26786.  @junebug8485  In 1958, the Yellow River flooded that coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. In July 1958, the peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 m3/s (790,000 cu ft/s) with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kg/m3 (57 lb/cu ft). The flood water level was so high that it rose up to the top of the levee in several places. This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. It was reported as the most severe flood since 1933. ... Source: Wikipedia: 1958 Yellow River Flood So how is it that Mao's policies were responsible for the deaths of millions of people?
    1
  26787.  @jinpxi4078  It was the first time an official with the rank of House of Speakers visited the island. It's apparent that the U.S is not committed to peaceful reunification if they continue to stir up cross-strait tensions. Also when did you actually posed such a question at all in this thread?
    1
  26788.  @MarkYeung1  At the beginning of the Japanese invasion, while it was the Nationalist forces which took the blunt of the invasion, Generalissimo Chiang-kai Shek was not truly interested in repelling the invaders as he was more interested in eliminating the fledgling communist party. It took two of his subordinates (Generals Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng) kidnapping Chiang in what's known as the Xi'an Incident, as well as communist goodwill by Zhou Enlai ad Lin Boqu who arrived in Xi'an to negotiate for Chiang's release, that Chiang finally agreed to fight the Japanese. But even with that in mind, Chiang was still only half-hearted in his efforts against the Japanese and he reserved his best troops to fight the communists during the last phase of the Sino-Japanese War. The U.S General Stillwell was sent to assist China in protecting the China Burma Road. He treated the Nationalist soldiers and the Communist soldiers alike with no political barrier. He trained both armies. This was a major irritation to Chiang Kai Shek, who wanted only his Nationalist soldiers to be trained. However, Stillwell paid him no attention and trained both the Nationalists and the communists. Towards the end, it was the communists who inflicted the most damage onto the Japanese and contributed most to the defeat of the Japanese in China and in so doing was able to seize large quantities of arms and ammunition in its civil war to vanquish the Nationalists despite the Nationalists receiving vast amount of materiel aid from the US.
    1
  26789.  @junebug8485  Chairman Mao is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and he succeeded in the herculean task of reunifying our divided country where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed during the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) period for 37 years. When Dr Sun Zhongshan overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    1
  26790.  @junebug8485  Check out the article: 11 Things You Should Know About Chiang Kai-shek (by Culture Trip) -He served in the Japanese Army, which could possibly be one reason why he was relunctant to meet the Japanese invaders head on. -He purged communists from within the ranks allowed him free reign to give himself what amounted to dictatorial power over much of China. -His own generals kidnapped him because he refused to take the Japanese threat seriously (Xi'an incident) -The Communists saved his leadership by convincing the officers to release Chiang (Xi'an incident) -Churchill and Roosevelt saw him as the legitimate leader of China, even though the Communist General Mao was responsible for much of the damage inflicted upon the Japanese, it was Chiang who got the credit mainly from Britain and the US. -He expected help from the allies against the communists, but his western ‘friends’ abandoned him. -He moved to Taiwan and set up a permanent state of martial law, thus ensuring his power was absolute. -He suppressed local culture, forbade the use of local languages and, during a period known as the ‘White Terror’, his party was responsible for the imprisonment of 140,000 Taiwanese. -He held the Taiwan presidency for 25 years, when in fact the constitution only allowed for two terms in power, but with martial law as his excuse, Chiang could rule indefinitely. ... Source: 11 Things You Should Know About Chiang Kai-shek (by Culture Trip)
    1
  26791.  @junebug8485  Second time? The first time you didn't even educate me, whereas I've directed you to an article explicitly stating that the Communist General Mao inflicted the most damage onto the Japanese. 1. Sparrows did prey on locusts, but Chinese farmers also kept insect-eating livestock like chickens and ducks, and our rice fields had frogs and fishes as well. The sparrows also ate grain in addition to locusts, so there's a possibility that the agricultural yield would be lower if sparrows were allowed to roam free. 2. So if the local officials reported exaggerated crop yields to the higher ups, then it's a problem from the bottom up, not the top down. If they state a goal that they cannot achieve, then they'll have to bear the burden if they fail to meet the goal they aim for. 3. What's the name of this one village with his party boss and his colleagues?
    1
  26792.  @junebug8485  Under Mao Zedong, China nearly doubled in population from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. Under Mao, China's life expectancy at birth nearly doubled from from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980, and is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al. 1984; Coale1984; Jamison 1984; Banister 1987; Ravallion 1997; Banister and Hill 2004). Under Mao, Infant Mortality (under 1 year of age) fell from 195 per thousand births in 1950 to 55 per 1k births in 1980. ... Source: An exploration of China's mortality decline under Mao: A provincial analysis, 1950–80 (National Library of Medicine)
    1
  26793.  @junebug8485  Also during the Chinese Civil War, the communists were clearly outnumbered by the KMT, even after the Japanese surrender in 1945, the KMT had a strength of: -2 million (regular) -2.3 million (militia) (June 1946) While the Communists had a strength of: -1.2 million (regular) -2.6 million (militia) (July 1945). ... Source: Wikipedia: Chinese Civil War So either way you look at it, the KMT outnumbered the communists. And mind you, this was after 1945, so the Japanese have surrendered and there was no more fighting the Japanese. Yet despite this numerical advantage the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Taiwan? Yet why'd you say the communists weren't outnumbered?
    1
  26794.  @MarkYeung1  I refer you to the article: 11 Things You Should Know About Chiang Kai-shek (by Culture Trip) -He served in the Japanese Army, which could possibly be one reason why he was relunctant to meet the Japanese invaders head on. -He purged communists from within the ranks allowed him free reign to give himself what amounted to dictatorial power over much of China. -His own generals kidnapped him because he refused to take the Japanese threat seriously (Xi'an incident) -The Communists saved his leadership by convincing the officers to release Chiang (Xi'an incident) -Churchill and Roosevelt saw him as the legitimate leader of China, even though the Communist General Mao was responsible for much of the damage inflicted upon the Japanese, it was Chiang who got the credit mainly from Britain and the US. -He expected help from the allies against the communists, but his western ‘friends’ abandoned him. -He moved to Taiwan and set up a permanent state of martial law, thus ensuring his power was absolute. -He suppressed local culture, forbade the use of local languages and, during a period known as the ‘White Terror’, his party was responsible for the imprisonment of 140,000 Taiwanese. -He held the Taiwan presidency for 25 years, when in fact the constitution only allowed for two terms in power, but with martial law as his excuse, Chiang could rule indefinitely. ... Source: 11 Things You Should Know About Chiang Kai-shek (by Culture Trip) In this article, it was shown that the Communist General Mao was responsible for much of the damage inflicted upon the Japanese, and it was Chiang kai-shek that was relunctant (i.e half-hearted) in his fight against the Japanese. You said: "When usa and British entered the war in 1941, did they deal with KMT or CCP?" The U.S General Stillwell trained both the KMT and the communists like I said earlier. Even till today, the communists
    1
  26795.  @MarkYeung1  During the Sino-Japanese War, the communist generals fought at the front line and many sustained injuries, while the KMT leaders rarely take the lead, they often escaped and let the ordinary KMT troops do the fighting. For example, there are 12 communists generals with amputated arms: He Bingyan(贺炳炎), Peng Shaohui(彭绍辉), Yu Qiuli(余秋里), Yan Fusheng(晏福生), Zhuo Qi(左齐), Zhu Shengda(朱声达), Su Lu(苏鲁), Chen Bo(陈波), Peng Shousheng(彭寿生), Peng Qingyun(彭清云), Tong Yansheng(童炎生), Liao Zhengguo(廖政国). There's 1 communist general with broken feet, Zhong Chibing(钟赤兵). 7 Communist generals and 1 marshal have one missing eye: Liu Bocheng(刘伯承), Li Zuopeng(李作鹏), Zhou Chunquan(周纯全), Zhao Rong(赵熔), Xu Binzhou(徐斌洲), Shi Zhiben(石志本), He Qingji(贺庆积), Li Wenqing(李文清) In comparison, even though the KMT officers fought the Japanese for 8 years, they all have their limbs intact. There are no KMT generals with missing limbs or missing eyes.
    1
  26796.  @junebug8485  1. But Chinese farmers kept insect-eating livestock like chickens and ducks, and our rice fields have insect-eating frogs and fishes. Sparrows are not the only animals that eat insects. 2. Local officials choose to put themselves under pressure, so they over-exaggerated the crop yields, then the problem is bottom up, not top down. Even Mao Zedong personally went to the fields to inspect it, and the local officials had workers transplant stalks of grain from dying fields to healthy fields to give off the appearance of a "bumper harvest", so Mao thought there was sufficient grain to export. So it was the local officials lying about harvest figures that caused the famine, not Mao's policies. 3. So you can't give me the name of that one village with his party boss and his colleagues? Then it's possible that it's only just 1 village, while the other villages had healthy relations. 4. My original point still stands, that in 1958, the Yellow River flooded that coincided with the onset of the Great Leap Forward. In July 1958, the peak discharge of the Yellow River at Huayuankou was 22,300 m3/s (790,000 cu ft/s) with a maximum sediment concentration of 911 kg/m3 (57 lb/cu ft). The flood water level was so high that it rose up to the top of the levee in several places. This flood affected 741,000 people, submerged over half a million acres of crops (3.04 million mu), and destroyed over 300,000 houses in 1708 villages. It was reported as the most severe flood since 1933. ... Source: Wikipedia: 1958 Yellow River Flood So weather conditions clearly played a role in the Great Chinese Famine.
    1
  26797.  @junebug8485  So you have nothing to show that the KMT were outnumbered? After the Japanese surrendered in 1945, the KMT had a strength of: -2 million (regular) -2.3 million (militia) (June 1946) While the Communists had a strength of: -1.2 million (regular) -2.6 million (militia) (July 1945). ... Source: Wikipedia: Chinese Civil War So whichever way you look at it, the KMT enjoyed numerical superiority over the communists after the 1945 Japanese surrender. And mind you this was after the Japanese have surrendered, so there was no more fighting the Japanese, and yet the KMT still lost the mainland to communists and had to flee to Taiwan island? Also, if the KMT did all the fighting, then why is it the majority of the people in mainland China aren't grateful to the KMT, instead they are grateful to the communists?
    1
  26798.  @junebug8485  During the Sino-Japanese War, the communist generals fought at the front line and many sustained injuries, while the KMT leaders rarely take the lead, they often escaped and let the ordinary KMT troops do the fighting. For example, there are 12 communists generals with missing arms: He Bingyan(贺炳炎), Peng Shaohui(彭绍辉), Yu Qiuli(余秋里), Yan Fusheng(晏福生), Zhuo Qi(左齐), Zhu Shengda(朱声达), Su Lu(苏鲁), Chen Bo(陈波), Peng Shousheng(彭寿生), Peng Qingyun(彭清云), Tong Yansheng(童炎生), Liao Zhengguo(廖政国). There's 1 communist general with broken feet, Zhong Chibing(钟赤兵). 7 Communist generals and 1 marshal have one missing eye: Liu Bocheng(刘伯承), Li Zuopeng(李作鹏), Zhou Chunquan(周纯全), Zhao Rong(赵熔), Xu Binzhou(徐斌洲), Shi Zhiben(石志本), He Qingji(贺庆积), Li Wenqing(李文清) In comparison, even though the KMT officers fought the Japanese for 8 years, they all have their limbs intact. There are no KMT generals with missing limbs or missing eyes.
    1
  26799.  @junebug8485  You said: "Summary: Initially, cooperation was high and the communists were very effective in guerilla warfare, but rarely ever confronted the Japanese." Wrong. Please read your source again. Wikipedia: Second United Front said: "The Communists acted independently and hardly ever engaged the Japanese in conventional battles but proved efficient in guerrilla warfare." Please note that the phrase "Hardly ever engaged the Japanese in Conventional Battles" is not the same as "Hardly ever engaged the Japanese" (like you are claiming). The Communists had smaller numbers than the KMT and the Japanese, so Mao Zedong employed tactics that allow a smaller force to take on a much larger opponent, such as guerilla warfare, and even your source admits that the communists guerrilla warfare was efficient. (Also, it seems that your source admits to the fact that the communists had smaller numbers than the KMT. Yet despite their numerical disadvantage, the communists still won the mainland from the KMT)
    1
  26800.  @junebug8485  You said: "Summary: KMT was weakened by doing most of the fighting against the Japanese (as stated in 1)," Wrong, it's clearly a misreading on your part of the statement: "The Communists acted independently and hardly ever engaged the Japanese in conventional battles but proved efficient in guerrilla warfare." Please note that the "hardly ever engaged the Japanese" applies to conventional battles, but it's not the same as "hardly ever engaging the Japanese. Period."_ Your source also confirms that the communists were efficient in guerilla warfare, which should help to distinguish the fact that the communist hardly ever engaged in conventional battles against the Japanese. You said: "so much in fact they could not hold their ground against communist troops." The KMT still enjoyed a numerical advantage over the communists. After the Japanese surrendered in 1945, the KMT had a strength of: -2 million (regular) -2.3 million (militia) (June 1946) While the Communists had a strength of: -1.2 million (regular) -2.6 million (militia) (July 1945). ... Source: Wikipedia: Chinese Civil War You said: " they were actually well equipped with Japanese weapons and soviet aid." The Republic of China (as a whole) received credits for $250 million for the purchase of Soviet weapons. There followed big arms deliveries, including guns, artillery pieces, more than 900 aircraft and 82 tanks. However, the deliveries halted in August 1941 due to German attack on the Soviet Union. Also, the KMT received U.S military aid, but they pocketed some $750,000,000 in American aid, so much that even then U.S President Harry S Truman made a remark about KMT corruption and wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves". Chiang’s nationalist army hoarded US aid monies, arms and material to such a degree that President Truman wrote that "the Chiangs, the Kungs and the Soongs (were) all thieves" having stolen some $750 million dollars of US funds. ... Source: The USA’s decades long warfare against China (by Robert S. Rodvik)
    1
  26801.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "The fact that Shenzhou doesn't know that even the CCP blame Mao for the failure of the Great Leap Forward speaks for itself." Could you direct me to such a source? According to Excerpts from Resolution on History of Mao's Contributions and Mistakes published on Western Media July 1, 1981. Comrade Mao Zedong was a great Marxist and a great proletarian revolutionary, strategist and theorist. It is true that he made gross mistakes during the Cultural Revolution, but if we judge his activities as a whole, his contributions to the Chinese revolution far outweigh his mistakes. His merits are primary and his errors secondary. He rendered indelible meritorious service in founding and building up our party and the Chinese liberation of the oppressed nations of the world and to the progress of mankind. ... Source: Excerpts from Resolution on History of Mao's Contributions and Mistakes, published on July 1, 1981. ... (But there is no mention of the CPC assigning blame to Mao for the Great Leap Forward. Could you perhaps furnish us with such a source for your claim?)
    1
  26802.  @jinpxi4078  "神州 Shenzhou tell the troll/bots STOP deleting comments and replies." Since when did users have the ability to delete other people's comments and replies? Could it be that YouTube Censorship is removing your comments?
    1
  26803.  @jinpxi4078  I've had the opportunity to learn English and study abroad, but I was appalled at the overwhelming negativity that many Westerners (but not all) have towards China. Whenever I bring up examples of China's positive achievements, some Westerners (not all of course) just laugh at me, called me brainwashed or a communist party shill. A few even took it a step further and even told me to "Go back to China if you like it there!", even though they've never actually set foot in China and seen what life is like here for themselves. Not everyone is like that of course, but most Westerners seem deep set in their perceptions of China.
    1
  26804.  @jinpxi4078  You said: "(To include kinda state sponsored racism towards blacks in P.r. C)" You're claiming that this racism against Africans is state-sponsored? How so? Officials in China’s Guangdong province has launched a raft of anti-discrimination policies targeting businesses and venues. Now, businesses and residential compounds “must implement non-discriminatory service... treat all Chinese and foreigners in Guangdong equally, and firmly oppose any racist or discriminatory speech and behavior. The measures target businesses such as hotels, shopping malls, restaurants and other places where Africans have been routinely turned away, as well as residential compounds. Education, public transport and medical service providers are also included in the new regulations.
    1
  26805.  @jinpxi4078  I've already told you that I've been to the U.S, and it's not all roses and sunshine like it's been made out to be. I mean, China's life expectancy is now higher than that of the United States. The US’s life expectancy continued its decline from 2020 to 2021, dropping sharply to 76.1 years. Where's China's life expectancy has climbed to 77.1 years. (Also, you claimed that there's state sponsored racism towards Africans in PRC, then could you give me an example?)
    1
  26806.  @jinpxi4078  I've already told you, I've been to the West and found that it's not all roses and sunshine. I've also quoted statistics about China's life expectancy having overtaken the U.S, why do you keep insisting that I get out more and visit stuff? Whereas you accused China of "state-sponsored" racism against Africans, whereas in Guangzhou, the local government has campaigns telling people not to discriminate against foreigners of a different skin color, so doesn't this run contrary to your claim?
    1
  26807.  @TheMargaretgallagher  What has Chinese Navy allegedly sinking a Vietnamese fishing vessel without picking up the Vietnamese fishermen even got to do with a hypothetical War between USA and China? Which Vietnamess vessel was sunk and what's the name of the Chinese vessel that allegedly sunk it?
    1
  26808.  @Restricted-028  China actually bought the West valuable time to prepare for the eventual arrival of Covid-19 onto their shores, but most Western countries just squandered the headstart that China bought them. Source: China Bought the West Time. The West Squandered It. nytimes.com/2020/03/13/opinion/china-response-china.html
    1
  26809. If you repeat a lie long enough, it becomes Isreal.
    1
  26810. Many Filipinos tend to have the "Colonial Mentality", worshipping Anglo-Saxon culture while harboring disdain for many "non-white" culture (including their own). Even though the Philippines has since decolonized, the mindsets of many of its people also need decolonization as well.
    1
  26811. Singapore has been under the authoritarian single party rule of PAP for 57 years, much like how China has been under CPC rule for 73 years.
    1
  26812.  @kalekainxx  "神州 Shenzhou would you repost a Chinese or Asian funded report on a western channel?" I could do that, but is there any reason I can't quote what Human Rights Watch says about Singapore?
    1
  26813.  @allistairneil8968  I pointed out that Singapore has been under authoritarian single-party PAP rule for 57 years, much like how China has been governed by CPC for 73 years. Is there a problem with this statement?
    1
  26814.  @allistairneil8968  In 2022, there this one-man Singaporean protestor who held up a "smiley-face" cardbaord sign in front of a police station, and he has been charged with unlawful assembly. Yet you think the Communist Party of China is considerably worst?
    1
  26815.  @zackk4393  But according to Wikipedia: A Madman's Diary, the diary form was inspired by Nikolai Gogol's short story "Diary of a Madman", as was the idea of the madman who sees reality more clearly than those around him. It's a work of fiction, not based on a true story.
    1
  26816.  @zackk4393  Synopsis: The story was inspired from a fiction entitled “Diary of a madman” written by Nikolai Gogol in 1834. As the title suggests, the story outlines a diary written by a madman. The allegory was conveyed by a first-person narrator. source:wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Madman%27s_Diary#Synopsis
    1
  26817.  @zackk4393  Have you actually been to China and see what life is like here for yourself? Here's a short 2-min video of 11 cities in China. Video:youtu.be/WyH7Af4Dt7E
    1
  26818.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Regime change. That must be why Carrie Lam was unable to run a second term." As far as I know, Carrie Lam herself choose not to seek a second term, that doesn't necessarily mean she was unable to run for a second term. Do you have evidence that Carrie Lam was unable to run a second term like you claimed?
    1
  26819.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou I was replying to a comment regarding China's understand of regime change." I read the comment you were replying to, and mansana was saying "China understands very well the western intention of regime change" so what has Hong Kong Chief Executive even got to do with it?
    1
  26820.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou when hong kong was returned to China, freedoms of press and speech (among others) were promised to Hong Kong people." That's why Hong Kong was ranked among the world's most freest according to freedom indices like Index of Freedom in the World (Hong Kong score: 8.81), Economic Freedom of the World (Hong Kong score: 8.91) and so on. So Hong Kong actually enjoyed many freedoms AFTER the 1997 return back to mainland China, of which they didn't have for 150 years as a British colony before.
    1
  26821.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "Given hong kong is part of China, that means western style freedoms (human rights) exist in Chinese lands, whether Beijing likes it or not." This is part of the "colonial mentality" that the people in many former colonies still suffer from as a result of being colonized by the West. For 150 years as a British colony, Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by the people in Hong Kong. Only during the period of Hong Kong's 1997 return to mainland China, did Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favorite leaders, under the One Country, Two System policy proposed by China. And this is in spite of the fact that after Hong Kong's return, it is within the mainland's right to implement whatever system they want on Hong Kong, since Hong Kong is part of China after all. Yet the Beijing government relented and specially allowed a separate governing system for Hong Kong. No Western democracy would allow another part of their country to be governed by a separate system.
    1
  26822.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou why does Western want a regime change in Hong Kong?" The Western powers want to use Hong Kong as a pawn to cause trouble for the mainland and contain China's rise, so they've given support to Hong Kong separatists to stir up trouble. So what has this got to do with whether Hong Kong Chief Executives finish 2 terms or not?
    1
  26823.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou you totally missed my point. Hong Kong people enjoys FREEDOMS before and after the handover that mainland doesn't have." That's the symptom of the "colonial mentality" that continues to plague many in Hong Kong, long after the British left Hong Kong. Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy for 150 years as a British colony, and they achieved their freedom rankings and held more elections AFTER the 1997 handover back to mainland China. It seems that even after British physically decolonized from Hong Kong, many in Hong Kong still need to have a "decolonization of the mind" in order to break free from this way of thinking.
    1
  26824.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou But is it still the same freedoms now after the National security laws?" As far as I know, Hong Kong still have their own government separate from the mainland government. Hong Kong have their own Hong Kong currency, their own Hong Kong passport, their own elections and what not, so how is Hong Kong freedom impacted? Also, Hong Kong was long overdue for a National Security Law, every state needs one. Even the U.S made use of their own National Security Law during the Jan 6th Capitol Hill riots.
    1
  26825.  @MarkYeung1  Just like the U.S National Security Law impacted the freedoms of Americans. Hong Kong's National Security Law is required under Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 (香港基本法第二十三條) to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government (aka Beijing) and also to prohibit foreign political organizations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region. This was stated as part of Hong Kong Basic Law, so the National Security Law actually fulfills the this article.
    1
  26826.  @tigermacan3474  Yes. Look no further than Saudi Arabia and Israel, both of whom have questionable human rights records, and yet the United States openly supports them regardless. It just goes to show that Western can selectively apply human rights when it suits their agenda, but this mark yeung guy seems to have the "colonial mentality" of blindly worshiping Anglo-Saxon culture while seemingly harboring a disdain for anything "non-white."
    1
  26827. Kwon is Korean sirname actually, like from the martial art Tae Kwon Do.
    1
  26828.  @Ezekiel903  Don't worry, according to you Egypt still have 2/3 of their GDP left if they want to help Palestine. Also, Egyptian aid often gets delayed or refused entry by IDF at the checkpoint into Gaza, whereas the effect on the Red Sea is piling up pressure for a ceasefire in Gaza.
    1
  26829.  @100c0c  "Shenzhou. Most companies are rerouting even if they're excluded. Insurance reasons." Get those companies to register their cargo with Russian vessels or Chinese vessels passing through the Red Sea.
    1
  26830.  electric messiah  Firstly, why can't China put the property under Chinese citizen name, instead of foreigner name? This is our country, and we reserve the right to protect our properties by ensure that they are under Chinese citizen name, so what's wrong with out laws? And nobody force laowhy to fork out the money for his apartment, its his choice to buy property in China isn't it?
    1
  26831.  @hepthegreat4005  Chinese property and real estate should be primarily reserved for Chinese citizens to live in. Thus, the Chinese government is taking measures to prevent foreigners from buying up property in China and driving up housing prices in China like you said. But why this laowhy frame it in negative light and make it look like China is the one at fault? I watch many of his videos and all he does is complain endlessly about China that's all.
    1
  26832.  @sreeniv09  You said: "Also China eats up all vulnerable orgs in various countries - Ask Australia" Did you know that of the Top 20 Australian companies, 15 are majority owned by US-based investors? 3 more were at least 25% US-owned. U.S ownership of Australia's biggest companies Commonwealth Bank of Australia (60% US owned) -CSL (57% US owned) -BHP Group (71% US owned) -Wespac Banking (62% US owned) -National Australia Bank (61% US owned) -Australia & NZ Banking (52% US owned) -Woolworths Group (63% US owned) -Wesfarmers (55% US owned) -Telstra Corp (21% US owned) -Macquarie Group (52% US owned) -Transurban Group (33% US owned) -Rio Tinto (62% US owned) -Woodside Petroleum (60% US owned) -Goodman Group (58% US owned) -Scentre Group (59% US owned) -Brambles (45% US owned) -Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield (51% US owned) -Fortescue Metals Group (15% US owned) -ResMed Inc (3% US owned) -Newcrest Mining (55% US owned) ... Source: Worried about agents of foreign influence? Just look at who owns Australia’s biggest companies
    1
  26833. Chinese President Xi Jinping is only entering his 3rd term, whereas German Chancellor Angela Merkel served 4 terms and would have done a 5th if she didn't voluntarily withdrew her candidacy from the last German election.
    1
  26834.  @youtubeshadowbannedme  A 39-year-old Asian woman from New York City suffered severe burns across her body after someone sneaked up behind her as she was throwing out the trash and splashed her with acid. Video: Asian woman attacked with acid outside her home in New York youtu.be/_XizsaCNaHc
    1
  26835.  @ninalee637  Evil? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place.
    1
  26836.  @ninalee637  Granted, the Communist Party of China is not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  26837.  @ninalee637  Look at USA wars in the Middle East during Afghan War, Iraq War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War and so on. USA is bombing those cities and destroying civilian lives and property, leaving civilians homeless, jobless and without family. The Iraq Body Count Project reported some 200,000 Iraqi civilian deaths because of Iraq War. Source: Iraq Body Count iraqbodycount.org
    1
  26838. When the think-tanks are funded by actual tank-makers themselves, conflict is their endgoal.
    1
  26839. War's already won and everybody knows that. The question is how will "peace" be won.
    1
  26840.  @Something-tz2vw  If you look at the Timeline of the South China Sea dispute, Chinese fishermen have been present in the Spratly Islands since 200 BC. Whereas Philippine's claim over the Spratly began while it was a Spanish colony in 17th century when the Spanish colonial government published the first edition of the Velarde map. Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_South_China_Sea_dispute So if anything, Philippine's historical claim over Spratly island began because the Spanish colonizers drew up maps encompassing the Spratly islands as within Philippines territory. Hence, Philippines claim over Spratly was artificially created by colonizers, not organically from within its own history.
    1
  26841.  @Something-tz2vw  So I take it that you're unable to point out which of my facts are BS? Then how can you claim my facts are BS? And with the addend "except to you mainland Chinese." too.
    1
  26842.  @Something-tz2vw  "Philippines would still be closer than Taiwan. Much closer" Taiping Island is literally one of the Spratly Islands how does that make Philippines closer? Sounds like you're the one coming up with BS yourself, all the while accusing others of BS.
    1
  26843.  @Something-tz2vw  You said: "I have a deep fondness of Chinese culture and history." Had you a fondness for Chinese history, then you would have known that Chinese fisherman have used the Spratly islands since 200 BCE. The Philippines' historical claim to Spratly Islands was artificially created when Spain colonized the Philippines and published the first edition of the Velarde map in 1734. Here we have a foreign colonial power just arbitrary drawing Philippines border to include the Spratlys. And the fact that Philippines still use the Spanish map to justify their claims over Spratlys just shows how much the colonial mentality has impacted the Philippines. Had you a fondness for Chinese history, you would have know that Taiwan still maintains the claims to the 11 Dash Line, which is even bigger than the 9 Dash Line by the mainland. You would have known that Zhongye Island (Thitu Island) in the Spratly was originally garrisoned by Chinese troops, before a typhoon in 1971 forced the troops to evacuate to Taiping Island and the Philippines saw this empty space and occupied Zhongye Island for themselves.
    1
  26844.  @Something-tz2vw  You said: "You and I would agree on many things but on this we don't need to." You claimed that my "facts" are BS, except to mainland Chinese, it just goes to show that you harbor disdain for mainland Chinese. When I ask you to point out which of my facts are BS, you change the topic to the weather! Then why pretend that you have a "deep fondness" of Chinese when you don't?
    1
  26845.  @Something-tz2vw  "I hope Chinese claims are based on more than just "our fishermen used them long ago.." What's Philippines' claims then? The Velarde map published by the Spanish colonial government? That's a map arbitrarily drawn by a foreign colonial power, without knowledge of the historical boundaries, and without consulting regional powers. It's not an organic claim coming from within, it's an artificially created claim introduced by the Spanish when Philippines became a Spanish colony. And it's because of the colonial mentality that Philippines still clings to this claim.
    1
  26846.  @Something-tz2vw  Why don't you answer my question first? I'm still waiting for you to point out which of my facts are BS, except to mainland Chinese.
    1
  26847.  @Something-tz2vw  If my facts were correct then why'd you said my facts are BS, except to mainland Chinese? I've provided dates, articles, maps, and various sources to support my argument, what have you done to support Philippines? And you self-proclaim to be fond of Chinese history, yet you don't even know the historical facts I provided, then why should I believe you? You're just pretending to be fond of China when it's apparent that you harbor animosity towards mainland Chinese.
    1
  26848.  @Something-tz2vw  "Also, don't be so quick to say something like "Filipinos are still living with colonial mentality."" You were so quick to dismiss my facts are BS, except to mainland Chinese, now you're calling me out on Filipino's colonial mentality? Simply google the term "Colonial Mentality" and Filipinos pop up in the results as the most prominent example of people with this mindset. You said: "No one lives in the past in the Philippines." Even it's name "The Philippines" is a name given by their Spanish colonial masters, naming the islands after King Philip II of Castile. The whole country is literally steeped in colonial mentality since its inception. You said: "Don't be like the Indians who do this in the comments all the time complaining about colonialism." I'm not Indian, but can't Indians complain about colonialism? Before the British arrived on it shores, India's GDP made up 25% of the world's total GDP. By the time, the British left India, India's share was only 4%. Where has all India's wealth gone? You said: "Luckily most Chinese people are better than that and look toward the future without trying to make their neighbors look bad." As I've said earlier, you can drop the pretense about caring about Chinese people. You literally claimed that my facts are BS, except to mainland Chinese, so why go on pretending that you care for Chinese when it's apparent that you do not?
    1
  26849.  @Something-tz2vw  Earlier you wrote: "China should leave Spratley islands alone, everyone knows they belong to Philippines for the most part." but who are you referring to by everyone? According to The Diplomat article titled: "Who Supports China in the South China Sea and Why" the authors found that 70 countries (highlighted in RED) have expressed their support for China's position in the South China Sea, compared to the 5-7 countries (highlighted in BLUE) that support Philippine's stance.
    1
  26850. Germany and Vietnam were fortunate that their countries eventually reunited and the people consider themselves German or Vietnamese today.
    1
  26851. Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous affair with a much older man has been exposed, and she's expressed a desire for personal privacy in a videocall with IOC. But the WTA would have none of that, and they are demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see, instead of respecting her wish for privacy.
    1
  26852.  @zackk4969  According to your "A Madman's Diary" it says: Lu Xun was an avant-garde Chinese writer who was celebrated for his fictional works that illustrates social and political criticism of early 20th century Chinese society and one amongst his great works of is the “Diary of a Madman”. So the book is a work of fiction that you're quoting.
    1
  26853.  @zackk4969  I searched for "Chloe Zhao & Oscar" and Baidu returned 334,000 revelant results (百度为您找到相关结果约334,000个) so why are you claiming Baidu is a liar?
    1
  26854.  @zackk4969  According to Wikipedia: "A Madman's Diary" 《狂人日記》The diary form was inspired by Nikolai Gogol's short story "Diary of a Madman", as was the idea of the madman who sees reality more clearly than those around him. So this was merely a work of fiction, yet you're claiming it Chinese culture of a thousand years is all about "eating baby"?
    1
  26855.  @zackk4969  Go and searched for "Chloe Zhao & Oscar" and Baidu returned 334,000 relevant results (百度为您找到相关结果约334,000个) so why are you claiming Baidu is a liar? Did you even bother do do your own search?
    1
  26856.  @zackk4393  Synopsis: The story was inspired from a fiction entitled “Diary of a madman” written by Nikolai Gogol in 1834. As the title suggests, the story outlines a diary written by a madman. The allegory was conveyed by a first-person narrator. source:wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Madman%27s_Diary#Synopsis
    1
  26857.  @primeroultimo  That doesn't explain how the United States being the world's most protectionist country and having over 800 protectionist measures from 2008-2013 according the Global Trade Alert. Were all those 800 protectionist measures all because of products not being made right?
    1
  26858.  @primeroultimo  But in the process, the United States became the most protectionist country in the world so whatever happened to the principles of "free market" when there are bans on products as the government exerts control over the market and economy?
    1
  26859.  @primeroultimo  "神州 Shenzhou the US is also the richest (21 trillion) most powerful (military) country in the world" But the richest, most powerful military country in the world just lost a 20 year-war in Afghanistan against a bunch of insurgents, and we are witnessing the consequences of US defeat in Afghanistan. This is unprecedented in human history.... or wait, nevermind, the mighty U.S Army also lost the Vietnam War against a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equiped, starving communist Vietnamese peasants, so this isn't unprecedented. It just goes to show that even if your country have the most powerful military, doesn't necessarily mean that your country will win wars.
    1
  26860.  @primeroultimo  The USA spent 20 years and trillions of dollars in Afghanistan to no avail. 70% of Afghan people live under the poverty line. Maybe if China help develop Afghanistan economically, building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels then Afghanistan would be probably better off than under 20 years of US occupation.
    1
  26861.  @primeroultimo  The Taliban previously grew opium, because the United States invaded their country and occupied Afghanistan for 20 years, so Taliban had no other sources of revenue except for growing narcotics. Once the Afghanistan government is formed and China-Afghanistan relations established, then Taliban willing, economic trade between China and the new Islamic Emirates of Afghanistan, can benefit from mutual win-win cooperation. It is in Afghanistan's neighbours (i.e Russia, Iran, China, India, Pakistan, etc) interests that Afghanistan does not suffer a humanitarian crisis with even more refugees flooding its neighbors, so economic development in Afghanistan will help stabilize their government. The USA and European countries choosing to slap sanctions on Afghanistan will not help the Afghan people build back their country.
    1
  26862.  @jso2073  How is President Xi Jinping behaving like Hitler? Hitler promoted antisemitism and racial supremacy, and Nazi Germany constantly demonised the Jews in their media. If the Communist Party of China was anything like the Nazis under Hitler, we should be seeing demonisation of ethnic minorities in Chinese media under President Xi Jinping. But if you watch Chinese media, they celebrate ethnic minoritie culture, festivals, food and traditional clothing, which is the exact opposite of what Nazis did to the Jews under Hitler.
    1
  26863.  @jso2073  Could you explain how does President Xi promote racial supremacy? If Xi Jinping was truly behaving like Hitler, then there should be promotion of racial supremacy of Han over the ethnic minorities, just as Hitler promoted antisemitism and demonised the Jews during Nazi Germany. Yet if you watch Chinese media, it is promoting ethnic minority's cultures, languages, festivals, cuisine and traditional clothing, which is the exact opposite of the Nazis antisemitism towards Jews.
    1
  26864.  @jso2073  China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w Which country is the real threat to global peace and stability here?
    1
  26865.  @jso2073  It's no secret today that America is in decline, and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set and many economists firmly believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's economy sometime in the foreseeable future. If China can surpass the United States as the premier world superpower someday in the future, then can't Chinese strive to achieve this eventual goal of ours?
    1
  26866.  @jso2073  About redefining "democracy", China is not interested in exporting our ideology unlike the Soviet Union with communism (or the USA with democracy). President Xi Jinping has publicly stated that "China's political system is not for export." China will not export its political system, President Xi Jinping told a forum for foreign political groups on Friday, as the ruling Communist Party seeks to boost its global image and take a more assertive international role. … Source: Reuters: President Xi says China will not export its political system I mean, why do you seem to think that democracy is the best form of government and don't seem to be able to tolerate alternative political systems ?
    1
  26867.  @yuanfangli9272  Chinese workers work hard to make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, toys, sneakers, clothing, etc cheap so that the cost of living in America is lower than it should be. Think about the billions of dollars Americans have saved on living expenses, thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that can then be spent elsewhere, on things like cars, housing, luxury brands, tuition fees, rent, etc. Isn't that why many Americans flock to Walmart for their everyday low prices? Because it saves them money?
    1
  26868.  @MarkYeung1  Google left China because it was unable to capture the majority market in China compared to Baidu (which also introduced several innovative features that Google didn't). . Google fumbled with an initially inferior Chinese search engine launched in 2000, while Baidu grabbed the lead in China–and kept it–with several innovative search features customized for local tastes. Baidu introduced community-oriented services that appealed to Chinese Internet users, including bulletin boards where leads on information could be exchanged–a service that Google China’s former president Kai-Fu Lee dismissed as having nothing to do with search. Baidu also offered instant messaging, a hit with China’s Netizens. Plus, Baidu was first to the market with mobile search and information offered up in multimedia, including video clips. Baidu also set up a national network of advertising resellers in 200 Chinese cities to educate businesses about the power of online advertising–a step that Google did not take. Source: Forbes: Why Google Is Quitting China
    1
  26869.  @MarkYeung1  While Google was initially in the lead in China, Baidu eventually overtook Google to dominate China's market share. Google struggled for a while but was unable to regain their former position, so that's why Google left China in the end. Here's a chart illustrating Google failing to capture majority market share of China from 2009-2020 youtu.be/ZVkbzy2gfnw
    1
  26870.  @MarkYeung1  The Boston Celtics was banned on Tencent after comments from Celtics center Enes Kanter advocating Tibetan independence. The game should be about sports, not politics, and the Chinese government clearly spelled out this in the rules of operating in China. I mean, should China continue allowing foreign companies that seek to mix politics into sports to continue earning Chinese people's money?
    1
  26871.  @MarkYeung1  Even Chinese NBA fans have reacted angrily over the criticism from Enes Kanter on Chinese social media. Video: Fans in China Angry over Critism from Enes Kanter youtu.be/8mLjPL1SbIo
    1
  26872.  @MarkYeung1  It's not a matter of "cooperating with the motherland government," Tibet is clearly recognised as part of China by countries all over the world. Even the United States recognises Tibet as part of China.
    1
  26873.  @MarkYeung1  You said: "foreign companies will be less likely to invest in China." China is literally the world's largest recipient of foreign investment. UN figures show China was the largest recipient of new foreign direct investment in 2020, overtaking the US for the first time. The Chinese economy brought in 163 billion dollars in investment as the coronavirus outbreak spread across the world. That compares to the 134 billion attracted by the United States. Video: China overtakes US as top country for foreign investment | DW News youtu.be/o-VHewwSz3A
    1
  26874.  @MarkYeung1  Does that mean that you also disagree with Boston Celtic center Enes Kanter remarks calling for the independence of Tibet? Here's a video of modern day Lhasa, Tibet, China (filmed by WildFilmsIndia) and you can see how developed Lhasa has become under communist party rule. Tibetans now have roads, railways, highways, bridges, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity, and modern technology like cars, telephone cables, computers, smartphones, WiFi, the Internet, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Video: Modern day Lhasa is not a patch on what you thought Tibet looks like youtu.be/3zIQlZopTPo (By WildFilmsIndia) Even the poorest Tibetan farmer can afford a smartphone, connect to the Internet and shop online in Taobao and have his purchases shipped all the way to Tibet in the Himalayas. Because Tibet is part of China after all.
    1
  26875.  @MarkYeung1  "神州 Shenzhou China has 4 times the population than the United States. Don't forget" What has China having 4 times the population of the United States, even got to do with the fact that China is the world's largest recipient of foreign investment?
    1
  26876.  @MarkYeung1  Some good news from Evergrande, it has paid its $83.5 million bond interest payment before the deadline.
    1
  26877.  @MarkYeung1  Video Evergrande avoids default with last-minute payment youtu.be/TO2gc8tbfjo
    1
  26878. Netanyahu does not want a ceasefire in Gaza, because he won't be able to bear the repercussions of his actions once peace is achieved.
    1
  26879. I've never actually heard of someone with a destroyed sense of smell. What about those garbage collectors who smell raw sewage on a daily basis? Sure they may be temporary immune to the smell after long term exposure, but their sense of smell isn't destroyed.
    1
  26880. @Sheriff Lobo "Chinese may have had a number of economic downturns during that period." It's possible, but if the economic downturns was small enough so as not to impact China's economic growth, then these economic downturns weren't "hard landings". It's possible that this Evergrande fiasco might eventually perhaps turn out to a small hiccup too. Who knows what lies in store?
    1
  26881. @Sheriff Lobo Evergrande holds physical assets (land) that it could sell, unlike Lehman Brothers who only had financial assets. And my point was that Westerners have been predicting China's economic collapse for 30 years which have all been proven wrong, then what makes you seem to think it will happen this time? In fact, Evergrande's crisis is actually more transparent than say the Lehman Brothers financials assets, because the value of land is simply more transparent and stable than financial instruments after all.
    1
  26882. @Sheriff Lobo How am I parroting the same messages as everyone else? No one that I know has even put a list of what Western journalists been predicting about China's economic collapse for 30 years.
    1
  26883.  @MarkYeung1  "Bankruptcy of Evergrande is almost inevitable." Good news, Evergrande has managed to avoid a default by paying a bond coupon before the weekend’s deadline. According to Bloomberg sources, the firm has wired the $83.5 million payment to bondholders. Video:youtu.be/5ZoKq9Aw_S8
    1
  26884. @Sheriff Lobo Good news, Evergrande has managed to avoid a default by paying a bond coupon before the weekend’s deadline. According to Bloomberg sources, the firm has wired the $83.5 million payment to bondholders.
    1
  26885. @Sheriff Lobo More good news, Evergrande has once again averted a destabilising default at the last minute. Several bondholders are said to have received their overdue coupon payments, made at the end of a 30-day grace period that ended on Nov 10. Video: China's Evergrande avoids default after paying overdue interest youtu.be/gLfKKAjiLAs
    1
  26886. @Sheriff Lobo Even more good news, Evergrande has resumed work on more than 10 projects in 6 cities. On its WeChat post, it said that some of the works it had resumed work on, had entered the interior decoration stage, while other buildings had recently finished construction. Video: Evergrande resumes work on more than 10 projects youtu.be/tbHTdvE5wqU
    1
  26887. @Sheriff Lobo The latest news on Evergrande avoiding the second default was just 6 days ago.
    1
  26888. @Sheriff Lobo You keep calling me a shill, but I've been quoting actual news reported on Evergrande, whereas you're just speculating about Evergrande's potential downfall as though it's a sure thing.
    1
  26889. @Sheriff Lobo Property giant China Evergrande says it has restarted work on more than 10 projects across six Chinese cities. The world’s most indebted developer issued social media posts on October 24, 2021, showing photos of buildings and workers at construction sites along with a statement saying it had resumed operations after averting a default on its offshore debt. youtu.be/ztExOvyFxVY
    1
  26890. @Sheriff Lobo Evergrande shares rose 17% after the company managed to avoid default and paid bondholders in time. Even just yesterday, 17th November, a CNN news article wrote that: Shares in the company rose as much as 4.3% in Hong Kong on Wednesday morning, though by the afternoon they had pared gains and were last up 1.1%.
    1
  26891. @Sheriff Lobo October 2017? That's 4 years ago my anti-China friend.
    1
  26892. @Sheriff Lobo Share prices fluctuate all the time, rising and falling. My previous comment was because you mocked me for bringing up news 3 weeks ago, yet here you are asking me for news since 4 years ago, yet you can't see your own irony? I may not personally own Evergrande stock but clearly, there are people buying and selling their shares, that's why Evergrande shares continue to rise and fall. You said: "No long term shareholder wants to lose 90% of their capital. I thought the CCP was all about the long term." The Communist Party of China is primarily for the people's interests, not so much for shareholders interests. President Xi Jinping summed it up best when he said: "Homes are for living in, not speculation."
    1
  26893. @Sheriff Lobo Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth propagated by the British. According to an article by Gregory Clark, all verified eyewitness present inside Tiananmen Square June 1989 say that Nothing Happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing's iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time -- among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. You said: "There is never any acknowledgement from you of problems caused by the government other than those admitted to by the government." Because clearly the Chinese government didn't cause this mess in Evergrande, it was primarily the shareholders, speculators and company policies that led to Evergrande being heavily in debt. Why are you seemingly so quick to blame the Chinese government for problems that weren't of its own creation? I've already stated that Evergrande shares rise and fall according to market forces, then there are obviously people still buying and selling Evergrande shares if not me. But any investor can tell you that investing comes with risks.
    1
  26894. @Sheriff Lobo Search for an article entitled: "Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies" By Gregory Clark for more information about it.
    1
  26895. @Sheriff Lobo "神州 Shenzhou Evergrande's problems were firstly caused by a lack of government regulation which allowed Evergrande to trade while insolvent." So you're claiming that it's due to lack of government regulation? Then you're against the principle of" free market" where there is no government regulation of the corporations isn't it? "They then decided to impose regulations which should have existed since time immemorial." So now you're in support of government regulating the corporations? It's like you're trying to pin all the blame on the Communist Party of China, regardless of the circumstances when it's apparent that the shareholders, the speculators and company policies lead Evergrande to the mess it is in today. And Evergrande's share prices fluctuate up and down because that's how market forces work, by driving it up (or down). Even though I may not buy Evergrande shares, clearly other people are buying their shares. My point about Tiananmen Square Massacre is that it's a Myth propagated by the British. According to Jay Matthews, reporter for The Washington Post as far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989 and all verified eyewitness accounts say that the students who remained in the square when troops arrived were allowed to leave peacefully.
    1
  26896. 老实说翻墙之后，就觉得西方媒体对中国太傲慢与偏见，而且很多美国人已经被美媒洗脑了。
    1
  26897. Source: China is donating 1,000 ventilators to help New York in coronavirus fight cnbc.com/2020/04/04/china-is-donating-1000-ventilators-to-help-new-york-in-coronavirus-fight.html
    1
  26898.  @DZ477  "神州 Shenzhou If you say that's not stealing, then why do you agree that the US is stealing when US paid for the supplies too?" Did I ever said I agree that the US is stealing? Could you please quote me my words saying that I agree that the US is stealing?
    1
  26899.  @DZ477  You accused me of agreeing that the US is stealing, then could you please quote me my words saying that I agree that the US is stealing?
    1
  26900.  @DZ477  Earlier, you accused me of agreeing that the US is stealing, (you said: "then why do you agree that the US is stealing") then could you please quote me my words saying that I agree that the US is stealing?
    1
  26901. USA contributed $400 million to the World Health Organization, China only contributed $40 million, yet Trump says WHO is China centric?
    1
  26902.  @ahmadmahdee9495  Chairman Mao Zedong did not kill those people though, they starved to death because of the Great Chinese Famine, which was caused by bad weather conditions like flood and drought, causing destruction of crops and resulting in poor harvest and mass starvation. Even Mao Zedong couldn't possibly control the weather isn't it? And if he somehow could, he would have wished for fair weather and bountiful harvests, because he wanted to make China strong enough to resist foreign imperialism.
    1
  26903. The irony is that Japan is still the U.S's lap dog.
    1
  26904.  @timetoreflect1394  CCP at war with our own people? Then according to your logic, I can also say USA is at war with its own people. America has the world's largest prison incarceration rate and its prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity, that sometimes the US government releases convicts back on to the streets in order to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons. Source: Wikipedia: List of countries by incarceration rate Having such a huge prison population represents a significant drain on US resources in upkeep and maintenance of its prisons. Worst thing is that many former convicts are unable for find proper employment once released from jail, and many return to a life of crime and wound up back behind bars. At least China is providing free education and training people in job skills to prepare them for the workplace.
    1
  26905.  @CuongNguyen-le5ic  Chinese workers make products like smartphones, computers, electronics, toys, clothing, sneakers, cheap to help many of our neighbors by keeping inflation in countries to a minimum and lowering the cost of living in countries like Japan and Korea. Think of the billions of dollars people in those countries have saved thanks to affordable Chinese goods. Money saved that they can then spent on pursuits like cars, housing, luxury brands, or paying off school fees, tuition fees, doctors fees and so on.
    1
  26906. It's said that people distrust people that they've wrong before. The West wronged China during the 19th century, which is probably the reason why now they fear retribution for their earlier actions, and that's why they ask themselves "Can they trust China?".
    1
  26907. Because some little squirt was unable to hold it all back, CA has to release it prematurely...
    1
  26908.  @patrikpass2962  "Show me one youtuber in China who dont like the ccp." PrimeInChina.
    1
  26909.  @patrikpass2962  SnarkyGuy doesn't really like the CPC too, but he's living in China.
    1
  26910.  @Introvert_Honey  Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. The graph below shows life-expectencies across China, USA and India. Source: Life expectancy at birth, total (years) - China, India, United States data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    1
  26911.  @patrikpass2962  After the Korean War, South Korea was actually dirt-poor under democracy, their GDP per capita was lower than some Sub-Saharan African countries and North Korea was actually the more prosperous country both militarily and economically on the Korean peninsula. But USA started pouring US aid into South Korea and that's why South Korea prospered. The United States’ $35 billion investment in economic foreign assistance has helped the Republic of Korea (ROK), once one of the poorest nations, become the world’s 12th largest economy. Source: Borgen Project: How U.S. Foreign Assistance Has Helped South Korea
    1
  26912.  @patrikpass2962  About Capitalism versus Communism, it's no secret today that Capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods in pursuit of profits, unnecessarily polluting the environment in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the planet. Yet we still have starving people, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking healthcare, because in capitalistic societies, the goods go to those who can afford them. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated according to needs. As the Marxist saying goes: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." The Earth's resources are finite and while capitalism seeks to exhaust them in pursuit of profits, communism is dedicated to distributing resources according to needs.
    1
  26913.  @patrikpass2962  Why don't you get the USA to lift sanctions on North Korea? Doing so will allow China to invest in North Korea, build infrastructure, export food, medicine, machinery, causing massive growth in North Korea. But the USA refuse to lift sanctions on DPRK, that's why they are poor, while simultaneously pouring funds into South Korea and making them rich. So you have admitted that it wasn't communism or capitalism that made South Korea rich and North Korea poor, it was because USA slapped sanctions on one country, while pouring aid into their neighbour.
    1
  26914.  @patrikpass2962  You support the USA sending aid to South Korea, then why can't China send aid to North Korea, you tell me? North Korea is our long time ally, Chinese companies send food, medicines and other humanitarian aid to North Korea, but you're against China supporting DPRK, but you support US supporting South Korea? What biased double standards is this? Since we are comparing political systems, then why not get the USA to lift all sanctions on North Korea, and see whether DPRK can succeed economically? You said communism doesn't work, but USA slapped sanctions on DPRK, then how can you prove that it don't work? If USA lifts those sanctions, Chinese businesses will expand in DPRK, import food, oil, medicines, machinery, build infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, in North Korea, and USA doesn't want NK to develop under their own political system, so that's why they slap sanctions. You can't prove communism isn't better than capitalism, when the USA slap sanctions on one country, while pouring funds into its neighbour.
    1
  26915.  @patrikpass2962  USA care absolutely nothing for North Korean people, USA slap crippling sanctions on DPRK, causing mass starvation in NK. Whereas China is DPRK's biggest trading partner, sending humanitarian aid to NK in the form of food, medicines, oil, machinery, what does the USA care about the plight of North Koreans? What are you even talking about? How is one-party system dangerous? China has one-party system but China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States has two-party state, yet is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. So which country is the real threat to global peace and stability?
    1
  26916. +Red0100 Medieval Europe made use of Chinese inventions like the crossbow, which allowed even untrained peasants to fight against skilled archers. Besides gunpowder, Chinese invented the handcannon, handgrenade, fragmentation bomb, landmines, naval mines, exploding cannonballs, rocket launchers, multi-launch systems, and of course, fireworks. There was even an ancient Chinese flamethrower that was capable of launching a continuous stream of flame, just like the ones used in WW2 and Vietnam War.
    1
  26917. +Red0100 Greek Fire was single usage, whereas China's flamethrower was continuous
    1
  26918. China built the world's fastest supercomputer, Sunway Taihulight 神威·太湖之光 as well as the world's 2nd fastest supercomputer Tianhe-2 天河-2 and in the 2017 Top500 supercomputer survey, China beat USA with 202 out of 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers, compared to USA's 144 out of 500. Source: China's supercomputers race past US to world dominance cnet.com/news/china-surpasses-us-in-supercomputer-usage-on-top-500-list/
    1
  26919. If a leader has shown to be strong and capable of producing results, then what's wrong with leaving him in power for while longer, to maximise the benefits to China? His presidential term is just being extended that's all, not that he will rule to his death.
    1
  26920. Yuda Heraldo If you are referring to the Diaoyu islands, then they were part of China before Japan invaded them and occupied them during the war. After Japanese surrender, they relinquish all their occupied territories so shouldn't Diaoyu islands be returned to China?
    1
  26921.  @pam4840  President Xi Jinping has shown to be a strong and competent leader, then what makes you think Xi is unqualified? Look at Donald Trump and do you think he's qualified to stand at the US Army parade?
    1
  26922.  @jerrylu3740  Polls show only a minority of Americans would favour US soldiers fighting to defend Taiwan. scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/2156237/what-would-us-do-if-beijing-decided-take-taiwan-force
    1
  26923.  Jar-Jar Binks  China currently has 2 operational aircraft carriers as well as 2 more aircraft carriers under construction in our shipyards. The next 2 aircraft carriers are expected to forgo the ramp design and to be true "flat-tops" like other modern aircraft carriers.
    1
  26924.  @lancealot4001  "神州 Shenzhou or to the ones who won the war" The Japanese did not win the war so why are the Diaoyu Islands Japanese territory then? Shouldn't they be returned to China, like when it was before the Japanese occupied the Diaoyu Islands?
    1
  26925.  @wildcat225  You people are just anti-China and biased against China's success that's all.
    1
  26926.  @Dweller415  What's so silly about our leader dressing up in military fatigues and leading our army? It helps improve our People's Liberation Army Navy soldiers morale too.
    1
  26927.  @jerrylu3740  If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China and since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then it remains part of China.
    1
  26928.  @jerrylu3740  Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Source: Map of ROC Administration and Claims wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg Why did Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa? The KMT had massive wealth (they taxed the peasants heavily) superior equipment, better training and superior numbers, yet they still lost the mainland to dirt-poor, poorly-trained, ill-equipped and heavily outnumbered communists?
    1
  26929.  @jerrylu3740  "神州 Shenzhou communist china at this very moment is also purging the tibetans and uygurs in westerners china." Where's your evidence for your claims? According to China's demographics, the population of Tibetans and Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 actually increased over the years. Population of Tibetans in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 2,775,622 1964: 2,501,174 1982: 3,821,950 1990: 4,593,072 2000: 5,416,021 2010: 6,282,187 Population of Uighurs in China from 1953 to 2010 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 Source: Demographics of China wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Ethnic_groups So where's your proof that Communist China is purging Tibetans and Uighurs?
    1
  26930.  @jerrylu3740  Why can't you give me the evidence yourself? Earlier you said "神州 Shenzhou show me." and I replied by quoting evidence to support my arguments, but you're so lazy you just tell me to google it instead?
    1
  26931.  @jerrylu3740  The population of Tibet is as follows: -90% Tibetan -8% Han -0.3% Monpa -0.3% Hui -0.2% others Source: Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibet_Autonomous_Region So what makes you claim Communist China is purging Tibetans and Uighurs? I gave you proof to support my arguments, you gave me nothing to support your argument.
    1
  26932.  @jerrylu3740  The 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent and a traitor to his people. He received funding from the CIA to support and train Tibetan guerrillas against the Central People's Government. Declassified CIA files have revealed CIA collaboration with the 14th Dalai Lama in attempting to overthrow the Central People's Government. A total of 1,735,000 dollars was devoted to the Tibetan program for FY1964 as follows: -Tibetan resistance efforts in Nepal (US$500,000) -Tibet Houses in New York and Geneva (1/2 year) (US$75,000) -Training (US$855,000) -Subsidy to the Dalai Lama (US$180,000) -Miscellaneous costs (US$125,000) Source: CIA Tibetan program wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Tibetan_program#Costs Here we have condemning evidence of the US interfere in China's internal affairs and supporting separatism in Tibet Autonomous Region. So why can't China take efforts to stop foreign interference in our affairs? And the Uighurs in Xinjiang are Chinese citizens by birth and they are receiving a proper Chinese education, learning Mandarin Chinese (national language of China) Chinese history and cultivating patriotism towards their homeland, China. Just like the Hawaiins in Hawaii are American Citizens by birth and they learn English at school, American history and cultivate patriotism towards their homeland, America.
    1
  26933.  @jerrylu3740  I gave you my sources when you asked me to "show you," why can't you do the same for my request for "Where's your evidence?" I answered your request (or rather, your "demand") but you're so lazy you can't even name a single source for your arguments? Instead, you lazily tell me to "google it" as your argument? I presented you with the evidence that 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent, and shown you the declassified CIA files, showing that the Dalai Lama received funds to train Tibetan guerrillas against the Central People's Government, what more do I need to prove? You can't refute my point that the 14th Dalai Lama is a CIA agent, so you just dismiss my claims, despite the proof before you? Why is USA interfering in China's internal affairs in Tibet, you tell me?
    1
  26934.  @jerrylu3740  Have you actually been to Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region and see how prosperous it is? Here's a short 1 min clip of Beautiful Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China. (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience) Video: Drone Aerial Night View of Urumqi, Xinjiang's Capital in China youtu.be/MkhORviAhDI Here's the full 3-min video of Beautiful Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital in China. (Suggestion: Watch in HD Fullscreen for best experience) Video: 新疆乌鲁木齐灯光秀抖音首发，请安静的看完 youtu.be/oPuFMooKLaA
    1
  26935.  @haikaloronsentnel138  It's no secret today that America is in decline and China is rising. But it's a combination of the Red Scare (fear of communism) and the Yellow Peril (fear of Asians overrunning the West) mindset that's fueling anti-China sentiment in the West today. Since the 19th century, many have grown so throughly accustomed to the notion of Western dominance, so much such that the very thought of a non-Western, non-Liberal Democratic country like China eventually surpassing the United States someday in the foreseeable future, is simply too frightening for many Westerners to fathom.
    1
  26936. Gen-hong Liu China's political system has shown to be viable for our country, what better form of leadership is there? Look at mainland China and we are the world's 2nd largest economy in the world and is still growing, whereas Hong Kong's economy is ranked 34th in the world and is currently in a slump today. What happened to Hong Kong's previous prosperity under British colonial rule from 1841-1997?
    1
  26937.  @keithedwards9953  Previously, Hong Kong was once a thriving port city while as British colony, while the mainland was still dirt-poor at that time. Today however, fortunes have reversed and Hong Kong has since fallen behind other rising mainland port cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo-Zhousan, etc, and is facing increasing levels of competition from other upcoming mainland cities like Qingdao, Tianjin, Xiamen, Dalian, etc. Source: List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports Source: List of busiest ports by cargo tonnage wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage And that's despite mainland cities being under communist party rule, while Hong Kong is suffering under its own democratic government. No wonder why the people of Hong Kong feel like they're being left behind as mainland cities start surpassing Hong Kong.
    1
  26938.  @keithedwards9953  Seized Hong Kong? Hong Kong was part taken from China by Britain During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us.
    1
  26939.  @keithedwards9953  Hong Kong was under authoritarian British colonial rule from 1841-1997, during which Hong Kong did not enjoy democracy and virtually no elections were held by people of Hong Kong while it was British colony. Only during the period of Hong Kong handover back to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get to vote in elections for their favourite leaders. So isn't it thanks to mainland China that Hong Kong people finally get democracy under the One Country, Two Systems Policy, when they had none before?
    1
  26940.  @keithedwards9953  Why Britain only "grant" Hong Kong democracy, freedom of speech, freedom of the press only after over 100 years of British rule? Hong Kong actually held more elections AFTER the 1997 handover back to mainland China, than it ever had for 150 years as British colony, so what makes you think Britain wanted to give Hong Kong that? China put forth the One Country, Two Systems Policy, and that's why Hong Kong finally gets democracy and their own separate government from the mainland, when they had none before. And why should CCP give the rest of mainland China that? Look at the chaos in Hong Kong right now and why should China let these riots spread to the mainland? Because Westerners say so?
    1
  26941. +Apophis XO Under Chinese laws, foreigners wanting to work in China must apply work visa (Z) and if their visa expires then they must renew it. Nobody in China will hire you if you are foreigner without a valid working permit. I mean, why should China harbour illegals who contribute nothing to society? Look at the number of illegal immigrants in America living off welfare and just collecting food stamps! China don't want to be like America so we have strict entry requirements. And how exactly do serpentza and laowhy demonstrated that they love China? They hardly make any Chinese friends apart from their wives. Instead, they usually hang around with other expats like prozzie, instead of building their local Chinese connections. Both China and America have things people aren't allowed to say. For example, in USA, can you as non-African walk up to someone of African descent and call him by the N-word? Can you make anti-LGBT statements on national TV without offending someone somewhere? The truth is that every country has things that people can't say in public and China is no different in this regard.
    1
  26942.  @mikestanfield5047  Every culture has people who segregate themselves yes, and if Chinese person live in America, but refuse to make local friends and instead hang out with other Chinese, constantly speaking Mandarin and broken English even after living in USA for so long, then I would claim that Chinese hasn't assimilated into American culture and language. If I were an American, I would probably consider this Chinese as a foreigner in my lands. But as far as I know, more Asians have made efforts to learn English and adopt the culture of their host countries, than Westerners have made to adopt Asian culture and language.
    1
  26943.  @markallen6226  At least I have human feelings and expressed my opinion in this post whereas you are just petty to imply that I am not human.
    1
  26944.  @apophisxo4480  Under Chinese marriage laws, you are NOT granted automatically granted Chinese citizenship just because you married a Chinese national. You should also remember that even though your country recognises your overseas marriage, it typically does not provide an automatic right for your spouse to enter your country: that is normally subject to a separate application and far from certain to be approved. In the same way a foreigner has no automatic right to live in China because he or she has married a Chinese. Source: Marriage Registration in China travelchinaguide.com/embassy/visa/marriage-registration.htm That should be the way immigration laws should be, in my opinion. I mean, look at US immigration laws and virtually anyone who has a family member who is US citizen, is eligible to apply for US citizenship himself/herself. That's why US get flooded by illegal immigrants, because foreigners like Mexicans, Asians and Muslims are marrying Americans for citizenship and then bringing their whole families over to USA. And who says you can't work in China if you are not married? So many foreigners work in China even when they are married to locals, so what exactly are you talking about? And how exactly do serpentza and laowhy contribute to society? Look at serpentza's wife working long hard hours as doctor to support her family, while her hubby goes biking across China and presumably abandoning her for weeks on end. Either that or serpentza hangs around with other expats and drinks alcohol on camera while complaining about China to his subscribers. How is that contributing to China? We don't need such people like serpentza living here in China! How exactly does serpentza and laowhy love China? Just look at their faces and behaviour and you can tell that they don't mean what they say when they say they love China! I mean, they always tend to blame the environment, blame the people, blame the government, etc for all their problems! Not once have they attempted to blame themselves. It's like they have some sort of "white privilege" and they expect China to cater for their needs instead of them assimilating into China. If you claimed you can say the N-word in USA against certain people, then I can also say you can call Chinese people "Winnie the Pooh" if you want. But if you say it to the President Xi's face then its possible that you will be arrested. So why the double standards between USA and China? Every country has some things that are not allowed to be said. For example, in countries like Austria and Germany, depictions of the Nazi flag and swastika are illegal if used outside of historic purposes.
    1
  26945.  @josephaether377  That guy @Matt M. was clearly forcing his opinion on me several times, even when I stated that we are entitled to our own opinions. Why should China continue to host serpentza and laowhy, when they clearly don't regard China as their home? Their Mandarin proficiency is horrible, despite living in China for like what? 10 years? 15 years? You can't hold decent conversation with them in Mandarin on everyday topics that interest Chinese, because their vocabulary is merely that of a 7-year old. So why should China welcome these two foreigners then?
    1
  26946.  @jamesmckenzie1266  serpentza himself doesn't seem to care about South Africa (the country he is from) he hardly talks about his homeland at all. I used to watch serpentza's earlier videos about China and they showed both the positive and negative aspects of China in a balanced manner. However, serpentza changed over the years and serpentza's latest videos about China have been largely negative in nature. He left China for America, yet he still produces negative videos about China. It's like he's bi**hing about his ex, even after break up. I know of many Chinese Americans who work hard to speak better English while in America. Far more Chinese and other Asians speak better English than Westerners speaking good Mandarin. I do agree that Chinese who live in America but speak poor English, aren't really Chinese Americans. Look at serpentza and c-milk's latest videos about China and they've been overwhelmingly negative about China, so what makes you think they love China when they clearly don't?
    1
  26947. Busiest airport in the world? Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong and Guangzhou airport see higher traffic than Singapore airport. List of busiest airports by passenger traffic (2019) 1. Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport (USA) 2. Beijing Capital International Airport (China) 3. Los Angeles International Airport (USA) 4. Tokyo Haneda Airport (Japan) 5. Dubai International Airport (UAE) 6. O'Hare International Airport (USA) 7. London Heathrow Airport (UK) 8. Shanghai Pudong International Airport (China) 9. Hong Kong International Airport (Hong Kong SAR, China) 10. Charles de Gaulle Airport (France) ... 16. Changi Airport (Singapore) ... Source: List of busiest airports by passenger traffic wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_airports_by_passenger_traffic#2019_half-year_statistics
    1
  26948. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26949. China prioritize saving lives at the expense of business. Whereas the West prioritize saving businesses at the expense of lives.
    1
  26950. According to its constitution, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  26951.  @supermantom2456  Fentanyl was created in 1959 by Dr. Paul Janssen as an intravenous surgical analgesic.
    1
  26952.  @benproffitt5957  You said: "Your claim is unsubstantiated as the U.S. doesn’t or isn’t interested in enslaving anyone for being anti-American." Tell that to Julian Assange. Free him and bring him home then.
    1
  26953.  @benproffitt5957  You said: "But U.S. forces around the globe are literally protecting against slavery (total control over our lives) which is what will happen under China and Russia." The U.S sanctions countries that defy it, such as Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, Russia, how is that protecting against slavery when the U.S attempts to silence other countries that oppose it? Yet you're accusing China and Russia of what the U.S is literally doing to other countries?
    1
  26954.  @benproffitt5957  You said: "But U.S. forces around the globe are literally protecting against slavery (total control over our lives) which is what will happen under China and Russia." The U.S literally sanctions countries that defy it, such as Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, Russia, how is that protecting against slavery when the U.S attempts to silence other countries that oppose it? Yet you're accusing China and Russia of what the U.S is literally doing to other countries? You said: "The U.S. isn’t perfect but at least we are free to live in our own way and have freedom to voice our opinions." Then why can't the U.S allow the rest of the world the freedom to live our own way? Instead, the U.S constantly seeks to impose their own ideology onto other countries.
    1
  26955.  @benproffitt5957  You said: "The U.S. isn’t perfect but at least we are free to live in our own way and have freedom to voice our opinions." Then why can't the U.S allow the rest of the world the freedom to live our own way? Instead, the U.S constantly meddles in the internal affairs of other countries.
    1
  26956.  @benproffitt5957  The difference is that U.S's "allies" are incapable of going against their masters (that's why it's unipolar), while China and Russia (together with India, Iran, etc) are multipolar as individuals providing multiple voices
    1
  26957.  @benproffitt5957  If you want to talk about prison populations, then it's actually the United States that has the world's largest prison incarceration rate, and their prisons are so full and packed to overcapacity, that sometimes the U.S government releases convicts back onto the streets to ease the overcrowded situation of its prisons.
    1
  26958.  @benproffitt5957  If you want to talk about prison populations, then do you know which country in the world houses the most number of prisoners? It's the United States of America.
    1
  26959.  @benproffitt5957  According to Wikipedia: List of countries with overseas military bases, China only has a handful of overseas bases, while Russia has a couple of dozen, but the United States has over 400 overseas military bases in Okinawa Japan, South Korea, Philippines, etc, surrounding China and Russia. So doesn't that reveal the unipolar world dominated by a single voice, as compared to the multipolar world dominated by multiple voices, that Russia and China are ushering in?
    1
  26960.  @jack99889988  "神州 Shenzhou No, in the west the media is regulated. They have an agenda to push a certain political view that they think is right, although their own government may or may take that idea." Therefore, the media is not government-regulated, that's what I mean by regulated. Fake news is rampart in the West, such as the conspiracy theory that 5G allegedly causes Covid-19, so much such that some gullible people set fire to 5G towers.
    1
  26961.  @Cursed_Mark  "It's 50 cents a post, not 50 cents for the same post." So I presume that once again, you're unable to refute my points so you just insinuate that I'm from the 50 cents army. How'd you know the supposed payout of the 50 cent army so intimately? Is it because you're a member yourself, possibly for the CIA?
    1
  26962.  @j.j7380  "神州 Shenzhou IOC President has literally taken photos with and is friends with top CCP members so how can we trust that fake nonsense" I don't understand your reasoning line of. Former U.S President Trump has also taken photos with Chinese President Xi Jinping, (so has Obama and even Biden) so does that mean that all those American leaders are unreliable and untrustworthy? What's your logic?
    1
  26963.  @HiredGoonage  You said: "Nice how they limited domestic flights out if Wuhan but allowed international." Except for chartered flights, no international passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since its lockdown on January 23, People's Daily learned exclusively from the Hubei Airport Group Company, so what international flights are you talking about?
    1
  26964.  @Blaze6432  No, because the IOC is respecting Peng Shuai's wishes for personal privacy, that's why they didn't upload the link to their video.
    1
  26965.  @Blaze6432  "It's not about privacy. She dissapeared. If someone doesn't want to be public about, they wouldn't dissappear." Peng Shuai has been publicly seen attending diners and award ceremonies for youth athletes, who said that she disappeared? "They would have made statement, acknowledged that they didn't want to comment, but they won't go missing off the face of the planet." Peng Shuai has wrote an email to WTA saying that the allegations of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent.
    1
  26966.  @Cursed_Mark  "Yes, I think most people would describe millions of people being rounded up and forced into internment camps at gunpoint where without charge, trial or sentencing are held for an indeterminate time and subject to systematic abuse purely for their ethnic and religious background as "discrimination"" Sounds like you're describing Guantanamo Bay Detention Center.
    1
  26967.  @Cursed_Mark  "It's common knowledge, son. If you weren't so servile and ignorant with an apparently state-imposed reluctance to self-reflect, you'd know these things, too." Where's it common knowledge that "It's 50 cents a post, not 50 cents for the same post."? How'd you know the details of how supposed 50-centers are paid so intimately? Could it be that you're one yourself, presumably for the CIA? Also, I assume that once again, you're unable to refute my earlier point, so you start labeling me a 50 center as a means of attacking me personally instead of attacking my points.
    1
  26968.  @Cursed_Mark  "神州 Shenzhou Your whataboutism is noted. Also, at least you don't deny these abuses." Yeah, I won't deny that these abuses are happening in Guantanamo Bay Detention Center. And what "whataboutism" are you talking about, when the comment you are responding to, @Lucky Luke was talking about "because they still torture people in Guantanamo Bay"? "then that's another criticism of this authoritarian regime ruled by a dictator for life." Well, German Chancellor Merkel has been in power for quite a long time, and nobody seems to really mind. Granted, if she didn't voluntarily choose not to run for re-election, many people would probably be fine with her running as Chancellor for life, if that's even possible.
    1
  26969. When China was 3rd world, we faced many 3rd world problems. Now China is 1st world, so naturally we face 1st world problems.
    1
  26970. Tibet was part of China since 800 years ago, when the Mongolians conquered both Tibet and Song Dynasty China, and made them part of Yuan dynasty China. Even the Manchus did the same thing, making Tibet, East Turkestan, Mongolia, and even their own home of Manchuria, all part of China today. If you want to take Genghis Khan and the Manchu leaders to international court, then you are free to do so. Otherwise, Tibet is recognized as autonomous region of China, just like Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria by UN countries, which is why the Map of China is drawn like that.
    1
  26971. Exactly. The Yuan and Qing were foreign dynasties of China that first incorporated territories of Tibet and Xinjiang into China. It was Mongolians that choose to first incorporate Mongolia into Yuan dynasty China, and it was the Manchu leaders that first incorporated Manchuria into Qing dynasty China. So if you want someone to blame for making Tibet and Xinjiang part of China, then why don't you blame Genghis Khan and the Manchu leaders? Simple as that.
    1
  26972. ROC (Taiwan) claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, etc) as part of its territory. ROC also claims territory belonging to Mongolia, Burma, Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan as part of its territory, so isn't it just as authoritarian? Source: Map of ROC (Taiwan) claims en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg
    1
  26973. If the leader is strong and capable of producing results, then I see no reason why the government can't let him remain in power a while longer. China should do whatever works best for the country, and to follow our own path to success, instead of just blindly copying Western government systems.
    1
  26974. Jason Uzumaki Why should the people of the country get to dictate who leads the country? Ordinary people aren't politically savvy enough to vote for important decisions regarding the country. Look at America, where charismatic people like Trump can seduce people to vote for him with false promises of making America great again, and they voted for him, even when he has zero political experience. Worst, there are people who refuse to vote, thus skewing the election results in favour of Trump. If Chinese people want change, then they join the communist party and must rise through the ranks to get elected as President, by garnering votes from other communist members who are aware of China's political situation. This system is not perfect, but it has produced leaders like President Xi Jinping, who has about 30 years of political experience, and Chinese people feel that he is competent enough to lead China. So why can't Chinese government decide what's best for the country? If you leave it to just ordinary people to decide, then they may not make the correct decision.
    1
  26975. Jason Uzumaki Throughout human history, many human societies were ruled by small groups of people. In numerous human societies, the nobility ruled over the peasants, because the nobility were educated and tend to be politically savvy, unlike the peasants. If not the nobility, then it's usually the priests who ruled, because they stored knowledge. In India, the caste system system meant that the Brahmin (priests) made all the important decisions regarding the country's future. What's wrong with this system when humans been following this system for thousands of years? Look at democratic Roman empire and in the end, it succumbed to barbarians, as individual provinces broke away. China has survived thousands of years under emperors, whereas modern Western democracy is only about 200-300 years old, so what reason should China follow Western form of government?
    1
  26976. Jason Uzumaki Who are you to suddenly demand answers out of me now? If Chinese people are unhappy with our rulers then we organise rebellions to take down the government, like the fall of ancient Chinese dynasties in the past. Didn't ancient Chinese people manage to overthrow unpopular rulers? What makes you think that Chinese people are helpless when history has shown otherwise? You are foul person to resort to vulgarities while demanding answers out of people. Who do you think you are here?
    1
  26977. Jason Uzumaki Just because you are "free" American, means you can impose your views onto me and suddenly demand answers out of me? Since when did I ever disrespect you, unlike what you done to me by abusing vulgarities here? What did I even do? I have shown that historically, the nobility ruled the peasants that's all in many human societies, but when did I ever treat you like a peasant and stupid then?
    1
  26978. Jason Uzumaki When did I ever dodge your question at all? I answered the question you demanded out of me didn't I? Yet you still claim I am disrespecting you when you are the one resorting to foul language? When did I impose my ideals onto you now? Did I say America and its people should follow my ideals? How is that considered treating you like a peasant and stupid? What makes you think Chinese people aren't able to fight back like they could before? If the government is really going in the wrong direction and doing things so badly, then the people will eventually rise up like what our ancestors did before. People in those revolutions were usually the peasants and lower-class Chinese and they weren't well-equipped as well back then as well, yet they manage to topple dynasties, so what makes you think Chinese people can't fight back if we choose to? As for right now, the government is doing a good job ensuring economic prosperity for China, so why can't Chinese people follow our own path to success different from Western countries? China survived 5000 years of history without democracy, whereas modern Western democracy is about 200-300 years old, so why is there a need to adopt Western democracy then, if nations can survive without it?
    1
  26979. Jason Uzumaki Does that mean you can abuse vulgarities in your demands? I don't make demands that you answer any of my questions, so what obligation do I have to answer yours? In the end I still answered your question didn't I? Also, where did I ever treated you as "stupid and a peasant", compared to how you treat me? Merely talking about history is considered disrespecting you is that what you are implying? What makes you think that today with technology and power of weapons, Chinese people will fight back with only sticks and stones? Of course if our government is truly bad to the point where ordinary people can't take it anymore, then people will start acquiring modern weapons (from outside sources, stealing them, etc) and forming a resistance to fight back and overthrow the government. History is full of examples of such occurrences, so what makes you think just because the military technology has improved, that people are suddenly unable to rebel? Look at US wars in Middle East, such as Afghanistan and Iraq, and the militants there are at technological disadvantage compared to US troops, but still manage to drag the war for over 15 years. What about even further back, when North Vietnamese troops fought to defend their homeland from American troops, despite the technological disadvantage? In my opinion, technological prowess is not the only factor involved in deciding victory. Your full sentence was "I agree china should follow its own path, but if China's government dictated that decision and not the people of China then I see that as misuse of power and forces the people to accept it even if they didn't agree with it." wasn't it?
    1
  26980.  @ChairmanMeow-fv5ym  If Taiwan is the true China, then why'd the KMT lose the mainland to the CPC? During the Chinese Civil War, the Kuomintang had massive wealth, superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet despite this initial advantage, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, ill-equipped starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan?
    1
  26981. Meanwhile, they don't want Chinese companies entering the US market.
    1
  26982. At the same time, they don't want Chinese companies to enter the US market.
    1
  26983. Well, why don't you start at home by getting rid of all your Made-in-China products then? Check your smartphones, computers, electronics, appliances, etc whether they are Made-in-China or contain parts ftpm China.
    1
  26984. I watched Oliver Stone's 2019 documentary, Revealing Ukraine and he interviewed Medvedchuk and it turns out that Putin is godfather to his children. He's a politician no doubt, but he seems to really care about his country and what Western powers did to plunder Ukraine of its resources.
    1
  26985. +Kaimanfrosty "You need to open up the country to industrialise as fast as possible" Then what about our newborn Chinese companies? They lack experience and know-how, and without protection, they will be destroyed by direct competition from foreign companies, and the foreign companies will flood China's markets and grab all our consumers. How else do you expect local companies to survive then? (Especially when China is new to industrialization)? You personally think its silly to let companies develop faster domestically then they will be competitive in a global market. But some Chinese brands like Huawei, Lenovo, Tencent, Alibaba, Baidu, etc, have become global brands after starting off from a safe environment within China. Here is a list of the largest internet companies in the world by revenue and market capitalization. Source:_List of largest Internet companies_ wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies I agree that China initially opened up and let in the big foreign companies like Nike and Apple, but its because its the first step made by China to industrialize and that was a good place to start. Even though Chinese people were making Apple Iphones, our workers at that time were too poor to even afford the products they were making. Russia's economy is not doing very well, primarily because Washington slaps numerous sanctions on Moscow, limiting their ability to do business with other countries. Its in this regard that's why China is able to capitalize on doing business with Russia, that USA is missing out on.
    1
  26986. +Kaimanfrosty Exactly. Initially, Chinese companies are new to the scene, and will get destroyed by competition from foreign companies, whom then proceed to dominate China's market. And how exactly do you expect Chinese companies to be able to recover and compete, once foreign companies become well-established in China? Those foreign companies would prevent new Chinese companies from even emerging at all, yet you just claim "it will pass then you will be able to compete"? Where's your proof? Also you said "the point is you reached that stage faster than if you were to try and foster those industries early on." then why is it other "free market" countries, like India for example, haven't yet reached that stage? Look at India, the world's largest democracy. As the world's 2nd most populous country, it has a labor force comparable to China. Many Indians speak English, whereas not many Chinese can claim to have good English. India is democratic, China was communist. The Republic of India was founded in 1947, whereas Peoples Republic of China was founded in 1949 (2 years later) Yet China has long overtaken India in many fields today, so where's your evidence that China would "reached that stage faster" than if we were to do things our way? "Another thing is that if consumers are to choose what will help them the most in terms of products, then being "flooded" with goods and services from other countries implies the host country couldn't meet those demands previously, so it is a weakness. What is better is to focus on what you are good at and through exchange make sure both parties do well, as the other party will be bad at things you are good at, again the labour force." Exactly, the global economy is like a wild river that flows where it wants, driven by economic forces and supply and demand. By following a free market economy, you are letting the economy "run its course" and this may cause damage to your local markets, exposing your weakness. But what has been done to address this "weakness" once exposed? Why not take earlier countermeasures to prevent such disasters from happening in the first place? China's approach is like "damming the river" in order to reduce its catastrophic effects on our markets. For example, the US dollar is stronger than the Chinese yuan, so Chinese goods appear cheaper, and Americans buy plenty of them and some of their revenue comes to China. But American goods will appear expensive to Chinese consumers, so not many Chinese buy them, and much of China's revenue remains within our country. That's how in just 30 years, China was able to lift 600 million people out of poverty. Just for comparison, Africa's entire population is about 1.2 billion, so the government lifted a number equal to 1/2 of Africa's entire population out of poverty in decades compared to what Westerners been doing in Africa for centuries. Russia's economy under the Soviet Union was stable and there was negligible unemployment and high job security. Soviet Union's GDP crossed $1 trillion in the 1970s and $2 trillion in the 1980s, but after Mikhail Gorbachev came to power in 1985, he began a process of economic liberalization by dismantling the command economy and moving towards a mixed economy. After its dissolution, the Soviet Union begat a Russian Federation with a growing pile of $66 billion in external debt and with barely a few billion dollars in net gold and foreign exchange reserves. And today, Washington is making it worst for Moscow by slapping economic sanctions to prevent Russia's economic recovery, and making Russia seek out other economic partners like China for example.
    1
  26987. +Kaimanfrosty 1) I never said China has zero foreign companies at all (after all, big US foreign companies like Apple and Nike came to China) all I said was that once these foreign companies become well-established and dominate China's markets, then how do you expect newborn Chinese companies to be able to compete with them? You clearly said "The local companies won't survive initially, the ones in big specialised areas will die and be replaced by foreign companies," so what makes you think the well-entrenched foreign companies would want local Chinese startups to compete with them? That's why although there are foreign companies in China, the government never lets them dominate Chinese markets and form a monopoly, instead it provides incentives and protects many Chinese startups, until they can become strong enough to stand on their own. In some extreme cases, China even "chase" the foreign company out (Google, Facebook, for example) and have a local Chinese company (Baidu, Weibo,) take over their positions in China. 2) I used India, because you yourself failed to show an actual example that China would have "reached that stage faster" Even in your reply here, you failed to name any country, and all you said is "in every other country that did, but mostly in economic theory." But you don't even name any country (claiming in every other country) and you rejected me using India for comparison? What double standards are you applying here? 3) "but the longer you wait to do this the further you start behind everyone else." You can't just rush newborn Chinese companies to be at the exact same level as experienced foreign companies. So why can't China wait as long as possible to open the floodgates? Once you open the flood gates, it becomes very difficult to close the gates again. Although the government "built a dam" to protect local companies from foreign competition, but nobody said the dam will always be up forever, and recently, the government is loosening restrictions on foreign companies in certain areas. Source China agrees to loosen foreign investment ‘negative list' ft.com/content/0fa8e644-6488-11e8-90c2-9563a0613e56 This is because China is confident that our local companies would be able to compete so a little relaxation of the restrictions on foreign investments, helps improve the local competitiveness. But as always, China is the one in full control of our markets and how much and how little foreign investment to add in. 4) Like I said earlier the global market, is a like raging, untamed river, flowing according to economic forces (consumer, demand, competition) and may cause widespread destruction. A dam controls the flow of water (letting only a trickle of water) and prevents flooding, so it represents Chinese government taking control of the Chinese economy and maximizing the benefits to China (aka, a planned economy) 5) What about Westerners running Africa DURING colonialism? Why aren't African countries the well-developed nations they should be under a Western free market? According to World Bank, China’s poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to mere 6.5% in 2012. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate of China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015 growing at an average annual rate of 10.39%. This is an impressive feat, considering that China is the world's most populous country, yet achieving a 6.5% poverty and 96.4% literacy rate. This feat has been termed "unprecedented" in human history (even by many Western scholars) and its believed to be unlikely to ever be repeated by other nations. Deng Xiaoping introduced capitalist reforms, but till today, China's economy is still considered a state-controlled economy. 6) "USSR had growth relative to the income slower than its capitalist counterparts, as did most communist countries." Slow growth was still growth for USSR. Must everything be done speedily and in haste? Look at the state of Russia today, and what happened to all its "slow" growth before? When USSR was unified, it was powerful, and that's why USA was careful in its moves, but now that Soviet Union collapsed, USA is drunk on being the surviving superpower, and takes bolder moves, such as sanctioning Russia, in an effort to make sure Russia stays down.
    1
  26988. +Kaimanfrosty That's what you said yes, but again, you just assumed "Once they are wealthier and better educated then they will be able to compete with the foreign company." How is that so? Why make life unnecessarily hard for our own local Chinese companies? You just make assumptions that things will go your way, when what you proposed has lots of risks involve that may make or break a company. China's assistance stops "foreign" monopoly of Chinese markets, but I never said anything about Chinese companies. I mean, this is our country, so why can't the government give assistance to our local companies to give them an edge over foreign companies? 2) Does Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, US, UK, or France, even have the same population size as China? That's the primary reason I brought up India, because as the world's 2nd most populous country, India's situation closely resembles China's situation. I mean, look at Singapore's and Hong Kong's small populations and why do you think they make a good comparison to China, the world's most populous country? Why you think India is not a better comparison, given the similar size of our populations? 3) "(China) still has the legacy of the state entrenched in the economy too deep." That is exactly the point I am trying to make. I am comparing how China's state-controlled (planned economy) fares against Western corporate-controlled (free market) economy. The Western governments surrender (virtually) all their control over their own economies and leave it to the profit-hungry corporations to control the economy, whereas majority of Chinese corporations are state-controlled. In my opinion, a state-controlled economy is better than a corporate-run economy. Corporations are out to make a profit, that's why America is flooded with Chinese goods, and US companies migrate to low labor countries, because they follow their profits. State-controlled corporations have goals that are aligned to the government's policies, and they also tend to enjoy better funding from the government. For example, in the aviation industry of big passenger jet planes, its currently dominated by a monopoly (duopoly?) by Boeing (USA) and Airbus (EU) and any other country faces enormous barriers to entry of this market, because of the duopoly. But China wants to enter this market, and we have our own answer in the form of the C919 Comac which is intended to compete primarily with the Boeing 737 MAX and Airbus A320neo. COMAC C919 - Chinese narrow-body twinjet airliner youtube.com/watch?v=axZ7YTZgcHg This is possible because the government pours in funding to the C919 that other aviation countries besides Boeing and Airbus lack in order to penetrate this market. 4) "But if it is a market where people can choose what they want without state interference then the people buying will decide who is doing better, and if another company is better for the person buying then why withhold it from them because some local companies are scared of competition?" That's exactly the situation happening in America. Americans are buying Chinese goods because they decide to, and local American companies are complaining that they can't compete with Chinese goods. I mean, I have been highlighting the various reasons why China should avoid the free trade policy, but you keep highlighting the opposite without providing any strong reason to do so. 5) So why aren't African countries taking off with a free market system? The entire population of the African continent is about 1.2 billion, which makes the continent itself comparable to China's 1.4 billion population, but China has industrialized whereas Africa has not. In fact, China is helping build infrastructure in African countries and here is a video about Chinese boss "complaining" to his African (Congolese) colleague on the state of Africa's infrastructure We Wuz Kings A Chinese Man Is Angry At Black Africans For Being Incapable Of Building Anything! youtube.com/watch?v=mtsa0MT2H4I The Chinese entrepreneur been in the Congo for 6 months since the new year, but haven't started work at all, because they are waiting for approval from the Congolese government. The Congo gained independence from colonial rule 50 years ago, and they had rail technology since 1930s (something which China didn't have back then) yet it is China that's helping Africans build railway now. So why is it you think India can match China, where even Africans failed? As for Singapore, Singapore's economy has been described as socialist instead of capitalist. It is estimated that the Singapore Government through Temasek and GIC own companies that account for more than 60%+ of the market capitalization of the Singapore Stock Exchange. Based on the definition and on this fact, Singapore is socialist (state-controlled economy) rather than free market. 6) If you grow too fast then your economy may suddenly collapse, like an expanding bubble, and that's what happened to USSR. China has learned harsh lessons from Soviet collapse, that's why China's growth did not result in China dissolving like USSR. And why is it Britain can invade America, cause genocide of Native Americans and occupy their lands even till today? Why Americans can make Hawaii and Guam part of US territory? Do countries sanction US+UK because of that?
    1
  26989. +Kaimanfrosty The CCP is not perfect, but it has done much to turn China from 3rd world, dirt poor, starving, war-torn county into a 1st world country, an economic power, world's largest land army, and global player of politics. Despite the initial setbacks, under CCP's leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates fell. Source: Life Expectancy at Birth in China, Europe, USA and India china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_L0_Boths.htm Chinese people knew what it's like to eat dirt for living, since we were once as poor as India in the past. But under CCP, China grew to become where we are today. Like I mentioned earlier, China's poverty fell from 88% to 7% and China's literacy rose from 65% to 96%. So as far as I'm concerned the CCP has earned its place and deserves its position as government of China. Like I said earlier, China's economy had just transitioned from Communist to Capitalist in 1970s, so you expect Chinese leaders to know all those factors you described that are present in a capitalist economy? We were new to capitalism and inexperienced, and had government just blindly opened the floodgates, foreign companies would swoop into China and dominate our markets and filled up all the areas, leaving none for local Chinese companies. So why can't China favor our local companies instead of foreign companies? What does providing benefits to foreign companies do for China? 2) I don't understand what you mean by "simply no correlation between economic growth and a single countries economy" A single countries economy has no correlation to economic growth? Then are you considering multiple countries economies growth? As for population density, business tends to travels fast in a compact country with high population density, as the businesses are located closeby and the audiences are concentrated in one area (like high population density HK and Singapore) But in China, the distances involved are vast and much further, and will first need to be bridged by proper infrastructure, if China is to develop our economies. Both HK and Singapore have adopted Mass Rapid Transport systems, but China's vast distances need the equivalent of High-Speed Rail. And it still doesn't dismiss the fact that China's population is much greater than those two combined. So its a whole different set of problems for high population density countries like Singapore and sparsely populated China (but still the most populous country) You said "I gave hong kong over India because they were free market oriented before and moreso than other chinese port cities were and industrialised earlier." so what I did is shown that India also has many port cities. Why don't you compare Indian port cities with Chinese port cities then? China has 34 major ports and more than 2000 minor ports, yet you compare 34 Chinese port cities with 1 HK port city? What's the logic when HK has to develop 1 port, and China has to develop 30 over ports? Since you want to compare HK with Shanghai, then today, Shanghai has overtaken Hong Kong as a port city and financial center in my opinion. Many more ships call at Shanghai's port than in Hong Kong, making Shanghai the world's busiest port. List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports 3) You said miscalculation is catastrophic, then all those US companies are bound to miscalculate one day (and that's why the 2008 financial crisis happened) and the corporations control the US government. Haven't you heard of Americans complaining that their government is overrun by the banks and corporations? Because of this, it becomes difficult to pull the country in any single direction. For example, USA wants to implement more green energy initiatives, but the big US oil companies (like Exxon Mobil) aren't happy with USA adopting green energy, so they take steps and countermeasures to hinder America's switch to green energy. That's why USA is involved in wars in Middle East (to control the oil) and President Trump even withdrew USA from 2017 Paris Climate Accord (so that USA doesn't have to cut CO2 emissions) Its because oil companies want USA to continue remaining reliant on fossil fuels. But in China, the government is planning to ban all coal plants by perhaps 2040 and switch to alternative sources of energy. China can do that, because our economy is state controlled. The government also plans to ban all non-electric cars in China, and besides giving China cleaner air, it will strike a massive blow to foreign fossil fuel car companies that don't have an electric model to operate in China. China Cancels 103 Coal Plants, Mindful of Smog and Wasted Capacity nytimes.com/2017/01/18/world/asia/china-coal-power-plants-pollution.html About China's economic crisis, Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. Here is compiled list of what Western journalists have to say about China's economy 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. But its already 2018, and China's economy is still going strong. At some point you'll stop believing what they claim and when Western economists predictions been proven wrong for almost 30 years consecutively. Yet you still think China on the brink of collapse? China's C919 Comac is going to be a new entry to market, and that's why Chinese companies are purchasing the plane. Every new plane has to start somewhere, so why not at home? If C919 Comac did not have the support of Chinese companies, then the whole project wouldn't be able to take off (pardon the pun) at all, because Boeing and Airbus will work to prevent Comac's entry into their duopoly. Maybe someday in the far future, flying on China's C919 would be as common as flying on Boeing and Airbus jetliners, But as for now, C919 is only just beginning to enter the market. 4) China's Three Gorges Dam is the world's largest hydroelectric station and it was very controversial project, but thanks to the government's "efficiency" it was completed on time and now supplies China with enormous amounts of renewable energy, making China the top hydroelectric power producer Top 9 Hydroelectric Power Countries China ranks 1st with 171 GW of installed hydroelectric capacity bionomicfuel.com/the-top-9-hydroelectric-power-countries/ China is also home to the world's largest photovoltaic power station, the 850 MW Longyangxia Dam Solar Park, in Qinghai, China. making China the world's largest producer of solar power. Top 10 solar-producing countries China ranks 1st with 130.4GW energydigital.com/renewable-energy/top-10-solar-producing-countries As for forcing companies to share IP to operate in your market, here's how I see it: America: Hey China, we want YOU to make our products cheap to give us an edge over our competition. China: No problem. But we'll need access to your sensitive blueprints and designs to make your product. America: Done! I mean, its our country and thus our laws, and foreign companies still choose to come here and set up shop. Therefore, they should abide by Chinese laws while in China that's all. 5) Size is the common denominator that China, India and Africa (all its countries) share when you want to raise people out of poverty in our countries. You said USA, Canada, Australia, and various other places around the world have had the equal or greater growth far earlier, but like you said, its far earlier, occuring over a span of 300 years when the Industrial Revolution started in the 1700s. But China only industrialized 40 years ago, yet achieved lifting 600 million out of poverty in decades, which is why it has been considered "unprecedented" and "unparalleled" by other countries. China has seen national economic growth that is unparalleled and unprecedented worldwide finance-monthly.com/2018/04/your-thoughts-chinas-unprecedented-economic-growth/ So which Singapore company is able to grow to become multi-billion dollar company today? Which Hong Kong company has grown to become recognized internationally? I mean, if those countries let in foreign investment then it only makes it harder for local companies to survive, since the foreigners dominate virtually everything. Only government-controlled Singapore companies have become powerful and that's only within the country itself.
    1
  26990. +Kaimanfrosty 6) Who are you to judge the use of force to keep a country together? Had CCP not sent in the PLA during Tiananmen, there would be massive social unrest which could have led to China "breaking up" like Soviet Union dissolution. You let Tiananmen people protest, then the Tibetans will follow, HK will follow, and Taiwan will want independence. China doesn't own Taiwan yet, but many countries in the world recognize Taiwan as part of China, and CCP intends to keep it that way. I mean, the KMT (Taiwan) tried to eradicate the communists, so why should we let them go, where they can grow to become a thorn in China's side? The group "Westerners" exist, just like you people sometimes use "Easterners" or "Asians" against us, so what's wrong with my usage of that term? You can impose your own judgement on China that "Any government that uses that much live ammunition on protestors isn't keeping it together" then why can't I do the same to your countries as well? Like I said, why do you impose double standards with regards to Chinese and the West? In truth, China don't care about how your government your country, but you busybodies constantly want to impose your own opinion onto how China govern our country. China has 5000 years of history and is among the world's 'continuous' living civilization still alive today, whereas other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since faded to history. China has a wealth of political literature and thousands of years of governing experience, all written in books from long ago by scholars, historians, strategists and philosophers. You think governing the world's most populous country is going to be easy? Look at what happened to the fall of Republic of Rome, when democracy tore the empire apart, as individual provinces wanted to break away. This is the harsh truth that history is telling us, yet you people just continue to pursue democracy, when it has a whole history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed and Republic of Rome too. Even though modern democracy is only about 300 years old, there's no guarantee that such a system won't fail in the future. Where as China's civilization has survived repeated division and reunification for millennia, following our own methods and experience taught by previous emperors of China. So why can't China follow our own methods of governance, even if the use of force is necessary to maintain peace internally? Did you know that the population of China is equivalent to the population of North America, South America, Australia, New Zealand, and all of Western Europe all combined? That just shows how many people China needs to take care off and in my opinion, the CCP has done a reasonably good job of governing a country of 1.4 billion people. It all boils down the choice between a Free Market and a Planned Economy for our countries. Free Market, means you just let the river flow to wherever its wants and it may result in destruction (like flooding your markets with Chinese goods) You can call it a weakness to work upon, but what has countries like America been doing to address this weakness? USA corporations literally control the government, directing USA wherever it wants, and not necessarily for USA's benefit. In China's planned economy, you make 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, to control and direct the river to maximize the benefits to China. You can give shield local companies from foreign competition and offer incentives to them to help local companies developed to become strong enough to venture out one day. Why should China give incentives to foreign companies? If a local Chinese company (like Baidu, Weibo) can take over a foreign company (Google, Facebook) then why can't we promote the local Chinese company? In a state-controlled economy, the government has as much control over the economy and can tweak the economy to best suit China. If not for government's protection, Chinese corporations like Tencent, Alibaba, Baidu, Huawei, Lenovo, etc, wouldn't exist at all, to become the multi million dollar companies they are today. _List of largest Internet companies_.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Internet_companies That's the big difference between state-controlled economy and corporation-controlled economy. If the government don't control the corporations, then the corporations will start controlling the government. Once you surrender control, it becomes much more difficult to retain control.
    1
  26991. +Kaimanfrosty The following video describes China's success in building up our digital market China's Digital Revolution (by VisualPolitik EN) youtube.com/watch?v=hZP9dZAx418 -China has the most E-commerce transactions online (42% of the entire world) greater than France Germany, UK, Japan and the US combined. -China has 700 million Internet users, more than all the Internet users in European Union and United States. -In Financial Technology (Fintech) adoption rates, China ranks 1st with 69% -Mobile Payments in China are worth about $5.5 trillion approximately 50 times the United States' $112 billion market -1 in 3 billion dollar startup companies (known as unicorns ) in the world are Chinese. As you can see, China's digital market is very attractive to foreign companies, and many of them want a slice of this pie. But thanks to the Chinese government's regulations, local Chinese companies enjoy more incentives and support than foreign companies and allows much of the profits to remain within China, instead of going to foreign companies. In my opinion, this is a good way to govern your country, and retain strict control over your markets and economy. Control the competition level to make life difficult for foreign companies to enter, but make it easy for Chinese startups to survive.
    1
  26992. +Kaimanfrosty So you get to pick which points to reply to this time? Who is ignoring who here? I constantly said China has world's largest population and its not easy lifting them out of poverty (as compared to populations of Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, etc) but you continually ignored them. I brought up India (world's 2nd most populous country) to compare with China, but you just ignored it and focus on the less populated states like Hong Kong. I mean, mainland Chinese port cities like Shanghai and Shenzhen have long overtaken port cities like Hong Kong. List of busiest container ports wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_container_ports 2) What do you mean by "economic growth doesn't depend on the single countries population size, or amount of people." ? The larger the population, the slower it is expected to grow, as more people need to be lifted out of poverty. There is also unlikely to be enough available resources to lift people out of poverty and develop the country. For example, China was initially dirt poor, starving country like India, because there aren't enough food for everyone, not enough schools for our kids, not enough hospitals, not enough roads, etc, etc. So why is population size suddenly irrelevant here? Why isn't India rapidly catching up to China, if you claim "growth very high in small countries and still very high in big countries while they industrialise." ? The term "Westerners" is clearly used to denote people from a Western culture and background, much the same way people use "Asians" to denote people of Asian culture and background. You may not use "Asians" but that doesn't stop other people from lumping Chinese, Koreans, Japanese, Indians, Vietnamese, Thai, Filipinos as "Asians" What exactly do you mean by the CCP proclaimed the CCP in 1949? The CCP proclaimed the People's Republic of China in 1949, but it doesn't mean China is not the same as the China of old, with 5000 years of Chinese history. Egypt the country exists today, but I am talking about the Egyptian civilization. Just like how Italy is not the Rome of old. I mean, does France, England, Turkey, Egypt, etc, still consider themselves part of the Roman empire? Whereas the Chinese empire survived relatively intact. Provinces like Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Hong Kong, Northern China, Southern China, are considered part of China today, and China has not fragmented like Rome did. Also, Chinese characters have been continuously in use since 1200 BCE whereas Sumerian Cuneiform, Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered dead languages today. I mean, ask most scholars (both Western and Eastern) and majority will agree that China is among the oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today. Not everyone will agree of course, but most historians consider China to be such the case. I am therefore, not alone in my opinion here. Otherwise, why is Rome not around today? Democracy failed in Greece, Spartan, Athens, and also Rome, so there's no guarantee that such a ideology will survive in the future. I mean, why so many ancient nations adopted a system where power is concentrated in the few, like priests (theocracy), nobles (aristocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy) instead of democracy where power is concentrated in the masses? Because priests, nobles and kings are educated people, capable of making important political decisions regarding the countries future. That's why oligarchies are such popular systems throughout human history and are stable political systems. But people like you have been trained to think "democracy" is the best political system, and that a "free market" is the best market, and refuse to consider other possibilities and continually reject them. Not every country has to follow Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of that.
    1
  26993. +Kaimanfrosty About the whole Free Market vs Planned Economy debate, thanks to Chinese government support and strategy, there are many Chinese brands that are beginning to gather international recognition lately. Examples of famous Chinese companies include Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, Taobao, Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, Lenovo, ZTE, and this list is not exhaustive. But where are all the famous Singapore and Hong Kong brands then? If you think Singapore and Hong Kong government industrialized faster than China, then where are those famous Singapore and Hong Kong brands/companies to show for all its progress and development? In Singapore, the famous Singapore companies are mostly government-owned (SMRT, Singtel, Mediacorp, etc) in the same way as many of China's state-owned companies. So what we can learn from the above, is that China's strategy of a planned economy has been largely successful in helping produce Chinese brands that can compete on a global scale. In their fledgling stages, many of Chinese companies like Alibaba, Xiaomi, Tencent, would have perished if exposed directly to international competition from the global market. Therefore, the government's strategy of favoring Chinese companies over foreign companies in China, helps give Chinese companies an edge over their foreign counterparts, and allowed them to thrive and grow to become the business giants they are today. Which part of the above strategy is hard to understand? Chinese brands today stand as testament to the government's effective strategy of a planned economy.
    1
  26994. + kaimanfrosty China is world's 2nd largest economy today (surpassing Singapore's and Hong Kong's economies) so how exactly is the Chinese government holding back our economy? You think Chinese government should just open the floodgates and let foreign companies dominate Chinese markets? Then how exactly are we going to produce viable Chinese companies of our own? Even till now, you failed to name any famous Singapore or Hong Kong company or brand, to show for their progress and development. Chinese companies today are a direct result of the forward thinking and planning by the Chinese government, and that's why the CCP's planned market economy is successful. Singapore and Hong Kong opened their markets completely and in the end, foreign companies dominated their markets and that's why there aren't any local companies that were able to compete with them successfully. China would never be where we are today if not for the CCP's forward thinking and strategic planning and I have throughly explained my stance. Economic growth should be slow and steady, not rapid uncontrolled growth which could possibly lead to collapse (like with the collapse of the Soviet Union). About China growing old before growing rich, that's a necessary sacrifice for our country to grow and no point having rapid growth but the country suddenly collapse like the USSR. There are just so many factors involved that it's impossible to elaborate on everything within a single post here. But the results of the CCP's strategies are obvious.
    1
  26995. China first invented paper and the paper banknote, and eventually the rest of the world followed with paper currencies of their own. Now China is rolling out digital Renminbi, and eventually, the rest of the world will follow with digital currencies of their own.
    1
  26996. The West targets Russia, and China knows that once they are done with Russia, they will come after China next.
    1
  26997. China knows that once the West is done with Russia, they will set their sights on China next.
    1
  26998. China knows that if Russia falls, then the west will set their sights on China next.
    1
  26999. USA and EU slapped tarriffs on Chinese products, then why should China be a friend of the West?
    1
  27000. There are some Chinese that have the "colonial mentality", which is the internalized perception that western values and culture are superior to other non-white cultures (including their own). This phenomena is most commonly observed in former colonies, as even after the colonizers left, the people's minds remain enslaved and loyal to their former masters.
    1
  27001.  @indexfinisher  Where is your earlier post? This is the first time you've ever replied to me. And you claim it certainly not to make Russia an enemy, yet Russia has placed Singapore on its list of "unfriendly countries" so how is Singapore being pragmatic here? To create an enemy when there were none before? Look at Singapore's neighbours and none of the other ASEAN countries have imposed sanctions on Russia, isn't that the more pragmatic approach? You said: "You can't be telling me Russia is doing better for its people than Singapore." Excuse me, but why can't I be telling you that? According to Russian non-governmental organisation Levada Center, about 85% of the Russian population approve of Putin in 2023, the highest in nearly 8 years. Whereas in Singapore, surveys indicate only 71% approval for the Singapore PM in 2020.
    1
  27002.  @indexfinisher  You said: "You can't be telling me Russia is doing better for its people than Singapore." According to Russian non-governmental organisation Levada Center, about 85% of the Russian population approve of Putin in 2023, the highest in nearly 8 years. Whereas in Singapore, surveys indicate only 71% approval for the Singapore PM in 2020.
    1
  27003.  @indexfinisher  "You can't be telling me Russia is doing better for its people than Singapore." 85% of Russians approve of their president. 71% of Singaporeans approving of their prime minister.
    1
  27004.  @indexfinisher  You said: "That is not an indication of one country doing better than another." Never said it was. But for starters it's an measurable indication that Russia is doing better for its people than Singapore. Wasn't that what you were talking about?
    1
  27005.  @christianmarriott3696  "神州 Shenzhou Taiwan cannot join the UN because of the one-china policy" So you're saying that something is controlling Taiwan's ability to join the UN as an independent country? That means Taiwan isn't independent after all. Even at the Olympics, Taiwan athletes can only compete under the name "Chinese Taipei" this shows that Taiwan is not independent if they can't even choose their name at the Olympics.
    1
  27006. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  27007. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  27008. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  27009. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  27010. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
    1
  27011. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  27012. Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.
    1
  27013.  @jaimemartinez9792   @Jaime Martinez  "神州 Shenzhou At least you acknowledge it." Since I acknowledged that the 1 Person, 1 Vote is clearly not the Chinese way, then why should China abandon our political system and adopt Western brand of democracy? Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  27014.  @jaimemartinez9792  "神州 Shenzhou You don't have to abandon it, but you should at least acknowledge it" Didn't you said I acknowledged it earlier? And since China's current political system has proven to be successful for China, then what's the point of acknowledging 1 Person, 1 Vote in the first place? That's clearly not the Chinese way, as 5000 years of Chinese history has shown, China is at our most successful when we are under the authoritarian rule (we still are today) of Emperors and the Imperial Court.
    1
  27015.  @jaimemartinez9792  Why be short-sighted, and only look at just 100-200 years of history, rather than 1000-2000 years of history? Democracy actually has a long history of failure. Athenian democracy failed, Spartan democracy failed, Greek democracy failed, even the Roman Empire eventually collapsed. Democracy wasn't even popular outside of Greece in the ancient world, and modern liberal democracy only has around 100-200 years of history, that's no guarantee that it will be successful in the future. In fact, throughout thousands of years of history, most ancient nations adopted authoritarian/oligarchic forms of government, where political power is concentrated in the hands of the few elites such as nobles (aristocracy), priests (theocracy) or kings and emperors (monarchy). Such political systems were prevalent because they were stable and because they worked. The elites were oftentimes well-educated and politically savvy enough to make imports decisions regarding the country's future, while the largely ignorant masses were kept far away from politics. …… Lastly, I would like to mention that China suffered 100 years of humiliation at the hands of Westerners, and under so-called "democratic" Republic of China 🇹🇼, China wasn't as successful as the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 today, so why should adopt Western brand of democracy, when historically it didn't work for us?
    1
  27016.  @jaimemartinez9792  Since China has undergone an Industrial Revolution of our own, without ever adopting Western democracy, then why should China adopt it? If you looked at history, many great empires, for example Achaemenid Empire, Akkadian empire, Armenian empire, Aksumite empire, Angevin empire, Armenian empire, Ashanti Empire, Austrian empire, Aztec empire, Babylonian empire, Bamana empire, Belgium empire, Benin empire, Bornu empire, Brazil empire, Bruneian empire, Bulgarian empire, Chinese empire, Danish empire, Egyptian empire, Ethiopian empire, Inca empire, Indian empire Japanese empire, Korean empire, and so many more, were authoritarian in nature and yet they were successful in their own ways. Since China has never been "democratic" for the last 100 years and is still not "democratic" then for what reason should China adopt Western brand of democracy? You just supported the idea that not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  27017.  @jaimemartinez9792  So why are you so adamant against the fact that China didn't copy Western brand of democracy? China is proof that countries can industrialise without adopting Western brand of democracy, doesn't this throw your claim that democracy led to the Industrial Revolution out the window?
    1
  27018.  @asserpopulous69  Do they print American Native language on the American currency, like what's being done in China?
    1
  27019. I thought many Westerners often boast about "freedom of speech" yet they don't want to show the voices from the other side of the conflict.
    1
  27020. +Tea Noire You are confusing work with play, and I never said women should devote ALL their time to tending their home. Can you quote me when did I ever said women should devote ALL their time to tending their home? Because I clearly never said ALL their time. And didn't men used to work long hours in the past, without much modern entertainment like we are enjoying today? Didn't men supported the whole family in past, while women tended to the family and raised multiple kids? Humanity has survived for much of history on such well-defined family roles, so why is there a sudden need to change them? There is no guarantee that such changes be successful in the future.
    1
  27021. The government is only locking down neighborhoods in Beijing that have confirmed cases. If you buy fever medicine, you'll get a notification encouraging you to take the COVID-19 test that's all, not that your building will be locked down. Trevor Noah just combine all those separate news together that's all.
    1
  27022. Do you have evidence that this woman was threatened? If not, then why jump to conclusions without proof?
    1
  27023.  @larry6601  You said: "She was forced. Her post (that was deleted for obvious reasons by the CCP) clearly states it was unwilling. UNWILLING is SEXUAL ASSAULT." I have read Peng Shuai's post (full translation available on Reddit) and while she was emotional over her previous tumultuous, on-and-off relationship with a much older man, where are the allegations of sexual assault in her post? In fact, according to the post she consented to have sex with him, then how can you claim sexual assault without proof? On 17th Nov, Peng Shuai even wrote an email to WTA stating that the allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. She also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent. You said: "You need to learn the difference between "Evidence" and "Proof". Evidence supports a claim, while proof establishes truth." So again does the OP have evidence that this woman was threatened? No evidence = No proof. And without proof, why did the OP jump to the conclusion that she was threatened? "That being said, there is a ton of evidence. Just because the CCP sweeps the proof under the rug doesn't mean the evidence can be hidden. There is enough evidence to treat it as proof." Where's this evidence that she is being threatened? You're saying that the Communist Party of China sweep this evidence (or did you called it proof?) under the rug doesn't mean the proof (or did you call it evidence?) can be hidden? So where is this evidence/proof that supposedly doesn't seem to exist?
    1
  27024.  @larry6601  You said: "So that's how you describe it? "Previous tumultuous, on and off relationship"? Way to divert from the truth." From Peng Shuai's post (full translations available on Reddit), she had previously known Zhang Gaoli 7 years earlier, before he got promote to Politburo standing, and they had sex before, and they had sex another time after meeting up again and according to Peng Shuai, the sex was consensual. Here's what she wrote: "You said in those seven years, you never forgot about me, and you will treat me well etc... I was terrified and anxious. Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you. Throughout my time with you after that, purely based on our interactions, you were a very good person, and you treated me well" "Just like the CCP redefines poverty as making $1.89/day or less," That's one possible definition of poverty according to the World Bank standards, then who said that Communist Party of China redefined poverty?
    1
  27025.  @larry6601  "All of her statements are under duress." Where's your evidence that all of her statements are under duress? "The evidence is in her tone of character AFTER she went missing for weeks." Peng Shuai is trying to keep a low profile after her previous relationship with a much older man has been revealed and she's expressed a desire for personal privacy in a video call with IOC. But the WTA would have none of this and is demanding that she appear in public to bare her private life for all the world to see.
    1
  27026.  @larry6601  "The CCP (no, not CPC, it's CCP, get it right)" The actual name of the party in Chinese is Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where Zhōngguó_(中国) means China and _Gòngchǎndǎng (共产党) means Communist Party so the correct name should be the Communist Party of China (CPC) not the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Because the name has China (the country) in it.
    1
  27027.  @larry6601  "My interpretation of her Weibo post in its entirety is that she was forced." Where does Peng Shuai say in her Weibo post that she was forced? I quoted the part where she agreed to sex, she wrote: "Taking into consideration the affection I had for you seven years ago, I agreed... yes, we had sex. Romantic attraction is such a complicated thing that explain it clearly. From that day on, I renewed my love for you." "I'm sorry, but when you're a married politician, and having sex with a star athlete, it's pretty obvious who's forcing who under who knows what conditions." Again, do you have evidence to support such a claim? Otherwise, it's just your own speculation that's all, could you point out where in Peng Shuai's post did she said she was forced? "Look up 1). IBRD, and 2). CCP China's voting shares, and the countries that vote alongside China in an effort to garner favor. The CCP is in the pockets of those who redefine poverty." 1) IBRD was created in 1944 to help Europe rebuild after World War II, but most of the developing countries in the world aren't exactly in Europe, does that mean IBRD is qualified to define "world poverty"? 2) Most of the countries that vote alongside China are poor developing countries themselves, so shouldn't the poor developed countries have a greater say in how to define poverty, rather poverty as defined by the rich developed countries? And your last statement that CPC is in the pockets of those who redefine poverty, do you have evidence of such an accusation? "Next, look up the statistic of income gaps between the Chinese people. Compare the top 0.2% of income earners with the bottom 40% of income earners. The top 0.2% easily brings up the averages for the entire country, thus giving the appearance of "lifting people out of poverty", but in reality, they're just deluding the real statistics of the bottom 40%." China's lifting of people out of poverty doesn't factor in the top 0.2%. Poverty in China refers mainly to the rural poor, so it doesn't take the top 0.2% and the bottom 40%, rendering your calculation invalid. However, when you compared to the United States, the bottom 50% of lower income American's lives haven't improved at all in the last 40 years.
    1
  27028.  @larry6601  "My evidence was provided in my previous message. It's obvious. The staged dinners, the recorded events, all awhile with her having a different demeanor about her." Where is the evidence that those dinners are staged? Previously you said: "The video taping of her eating dinner with CCP agents is also evidence." but how do you prove those were CPC agents? And you said: "The fact that everyone reacting to the camera like it were a staged event is also EVIDENCE" how is everyone reacting to the camera evidence that it was staged? Did you see her latest video where she's talking with former NBA star Yao Ming? "It is the CCP. You can call it CPC if you want, but it doesn't make it true." It is true, because that's the actual name of the party in Chinese, it's the Zhōngguó Gòngchǎndǎng (中国共产党) where Zhōngguó_(中国) means China and Gòngchǎndǎng (共产党) means Communist Party. "1. Only 7% of the Chinese population are in the CCP." But the party represents China. The CPC does all the planning for China's future, the goals and targets to achieve, the 5-year plans, 10-year plans, 20-year plans, 30-year plans, and so on. The CPC deals with all aspects of China from politics, economics, military, social issues, ethnic minority issues, cultural issues, education, R&D, etc and is the head of China, it's political representative, and the face of China to the world. That's why the it's called the Communist Party of China "2. It is a one party system, not representative of the people, by the people." How is it not representative of the people by the people? The CPC is comprised of Chinese people from all walks of lives. The top student (or top 5%) of every school in China is recruited to join the Communist Party, whether rich or poor, so the party is comprised of the best minds that China has to offer. And it is precisely because it's a one-party system, the CPC has to represent all of China. All the good things are credited to the CPC as well as blame for the bad things, and so the CPC learns from mistakes not to repeat them. Whereas in a two-party system (like USA for example) the two parties (Republicans and Democrats) constantly fight among themselves instead of fighting for America's future. Each sides tries to claim credit for America's success, meanwhile pushing the blame of America's failures onto the other party. That's how a two-party system is not representative of the people, by the people. I mean, the opposite is true; In a two-party system (i.e USA) if say the Americans elected the Republicans into power, then the Republican party represents only one aspect of the American population. Likewise, if the Americans elected the Democrats into power, then the Democratic party represents another aspect of the American population, not the whole country. That's possibly one reason why the USA is so divided today, because they have a two-party system, instead of a one-party system. I use America as an example, but you can use other multi-party systems and they seem to come to a similar sort of conclusion as this.
    1
  27029.  @larry6601  "Communism and authoritarianism don't work, and communism is only being kept alive in 5 countries (dying in 2, supported by the CCP in the other 2), all supported by Western capitalism and investment into China." It's no secret today that capitalism is killing the planet. Capitalism is the overproduction of goods for the sake of profits, unnecessarily polluting the Earth in the process, with the eventual goal being the complete depletion of the Earth's resources. Because our modern industries are just too efficient, we can literally produce enough food, goods, houses, schools, hospitals, etc for everyone on the Earth. Yet despite this, we still have starving people in the world, homeless people, illiteracy, people lacking access to healthcare, etc. Because under the capitalist system, the goods go to those who can afford it. Communism is the belief that every resource should be allocated to the people according to needs. The Earth's resources are finite, and capitalism only seeks to exhaust the Earth's resources in pursuit of profit, whereas communism is committed to the idea of distributing resources according to needs. Sure, it's not a perfect system but it seems preferable to capitalism, which is overproduction for the sake of profits. What's the point of hoarding profit? When we all eventually die, can capitalists take their profits into the afterlife? No. "1. If the CCP actually consisted of a notable size of the people of China" So what exactly is this "notable size" of the people of China? The Communist Party of China has a membership of 95 million members, that's about the population size of Germany for comparison. I mean, lets look at India, the world's largest democracy, and the leading Bharatiya Janata Party has a membership of 180 million (world's largest political party). That's impressive membership, but it only constitutes around 13% of India's entire population and isn't that much difference percentage-wise from the CPC's 7% of the people of China. "2. If the CCP didn't bully its neighbors in the South China Sea" What do you mean by bully? In 2013, the Philippines coastguard (patrol boat Maritime Control Surveillance 3001) shoot to death a 65-year old Chinese fisherman, Hong Shicheng (洪石成) but which Philippine fisherman been shot to death by Chinese coastguard? None! Indonesian government has been exploding fishing boats from Vietnam (142), the Philippines (76), Malaysia (49), as well as one from China, but Chinese government did not explode any other country's fishing boats. "3. If the CCP didn't encourage IP theft and forced technology transfer" Back when foreign companies started coming to China, they agreed to transfer technology as part of the terms of setting up shop here in China. China did not point a gun at these foreign companies and force them to transfer technology, if they don't like China's terms, then they are welcome to pack their bags and take their business elsewhere. But these foreign companies agreed to transfer technology to China, (because that's how capitalism works) then why blame China when they choose to do so?
    1
  27030.  @larry6601  "6. If the CCP stopped staking claim over a sovereign nation we know as Taiwan" If you go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution (nor has there been any formal declaration of independence from Taiwan) then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Many countries across the world recognize Taiwan as part of China, including the USA, UK, France, Germany, Canada, Australia, etc, and Taiwan doesn't have any embassies in any major countries. Recently, even the Solomon Islands and Nicaragua switched recognition of Taipei to Beijing. "8. If the CCP didn't support North Korea" North Korea 🇰🇵 is one of the allies of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳, they helped the communists fight against the nationalists KMT during the Chinese Civil War. To repay this, China helped North Korea push the U.S forces back, when the USA crossed the 38th Parallel and invaded the DPRK. China has also provided extensive economic assistance to Pyongyang to support the reconstruction and economic development of North Korea after the 1953 signing of the Korean War Armistice. Then why should China stop supporting North Korea? China is North Korea's biggest trade partner, we send food, medicine, humanitarian assistance, and Chinese companies to do business in North Korea, as well as Chinese tourists to visit the country and spend money on their economy, why should China cease all this support to North Korea? "9. If the CCP stops fishing the world's oceans to death with a larger distance fishing fleet larger than the world's combined" China has to feed the world's largest population (at an estimated 1.4 billion people), so our fishing vessels have to travel further to forage for food to feed our enormous population. Furthermore, it's actually better if Chinese fishing vessels travel far and wide, because can you imagine such a huge concentration of fishing vessels fishing only within Chinese waters? That would quickly deplete the fish stocks within Chinese waters if our vessels were restricted to only fishing within our waters.
    1
  27031. @sunflower Did you actually attend the Beijing Olympics yourself? What makes you think it's horrible?
    1
  27032. @sunflower What's fundamentally wrong with the Olympic torch bearer being of Uighur descent? What genocide? The population of Uighurs in China has actually grown from 3 million in 1953 to 11 million in 2020. That's because Uighurs aren't subject to the One Child Policy (unlike Han) so they can have as many kids as they want. Population of Uighurs in China according to ethnic group in censuses 1953 to 2020 1953: 3,640,125 1964: 3,996,311 1982: 5,917,030 1990: 7,207,024 2000: 8,399,393 2010: 10,069,346 2020: 11,774,538 …… Source: Wikipedia: Demographics of China Yet the Western allegations of Uighur genocide still persist? When the population of Uighurs in China actually tripled in size over the years?
    1
  27033. @sunflower Previously, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us. As for Taiwan, go and read Taiwan's own constitution and it says that Taiwan is part of China. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  27034. @sunflower How is Hong Kong an independent country? Does Hong Kong have their own army or were they historically protected by the British Army and now by the People's Liberation Army? And if you claim Taiwan is an independent country, why is it that Taiwan cannot join the United Nations like an independent country can? Is there something that's preventing Taiwan from joining the UN?
    1
  27035. @sunflower "神州 Shenzhou woah i just saw back of my head cuz i was rolling my eyes back so HARD" I guess this means that your head is empty, since your eyes can see right through to the back of your head.
    1
  27036. @sunflower "神州 Shenzhou i consider them as free country. We all should support them as one country they want their independence." So I guess you support Catalonia independence from Spain then? Or California independence movement? And the independence of Donetsk and Luhansk too? You asked "Dont hongkongers want independence?" No, they don't. Only a few separatists in Hong Kong want so, but wanting independence is not the same as being granted independence. And you still didn't answer me how is Hong Kong an independent country. You asked: " Its all about “one china” Isnt it true that taiwan cant even use their own flag in olympic because of that?" Yes, because Taiwan is part of China, not an independent country. They can't even use their own flag in the Olympics, and Taiwan cannot join the UN like an independent country can.
    1
  27037. @sunflower "神州 Shenzhou ?? The population grows so thats not genocide?" Which genocide in the world, has the population of ethnic group still growing?
    1
  27038. @North Korea Is Best Korea You said: "神州 Shenzhou Russia was a constituent republic of the Soviet Union," And so was Ukraine a constituent republic of the Soviet Union, so why don't you blame Ukraine and the other USSR republics?
    1
  27039. @North Korea Is Best Korea No, I pointed out that it was the Soviet Union that was involved in Afghanistan, not Russia as it is today. It's you who claimed that Russia was a constituent republic of the Soviet Union, then you should be implicating Ukraine and all the other Soviet Republics in your statement.
    1
  27040. @North Korea Is Best Korea Speaking of Afghanistan, it's the U.S that invaded Afghanistan and occupied it for nearly 20 years, before withdrawing in a shambolic manner and leaving behind billions of dollars worth of U.S military equipment for the Taliban. The democratically elected Afghan President Ghani fled the country with carloads of U.S cash, and the 300,000-strong Afghan Army surrendered to the Taliban in weeks with barely any resistance. If anything, this indicates that the U.S democratic experiment in Afghanistan has failed.
    1
  27041. @North Korea Is Best Korea No, I've already pointed out that it was the Soviet Union that gotten involved in Afghanistan, not the Russia today. You're the one claiming Russia is a constituent republic of the Soviet Union, well so was Ukraine and the other USSR republics.
    1
  27042. @North Korea Is Best Korea "神州 Shenzhou Why are you so confused?" Are you perhaps talking about yourself? I've made my stance clear many times, but it seems that you refuse to acknowledge Ukraine was a constituent republic of the Soviet Union.
    1